HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993 410 410
.1► t
,
RECEIVED
/o:37,4./n
AUG 1 p 1993
GRIEVANCE DAY
TOwn Cleric SouumiA
May 19, 1993
The morning session of the Board of Assessment Review
began at 9: 00 a.m. Present were:
John Sullivan, Chairman
Thomas Burdy, Co-Chairman
William F. English Jr.
Francis A. Thorp
1) 1000-117-5-46. 3
Gerard H. & Carolyn Schultheis
43 Harding Road
Old Greenwich, CT. 06870
Mr. Burdy: Do you solemnly swear that the information you give
herein will be given accurately and truthfully to the best of your
ability?
Mr. Schultheis: I do.
Mr. Sullivan: Do you have anything to say to the Board?
Mr. Schultheis: I received the notice of the assessment change and
I 'm basically looking into it. It was determined by me that my land
value had been changed because my land is bulkheaded. The land has
been bulkheaded for at least 60 or 70 years. I have photographs
dating back to the 1930 ' s showing the bulkheading around the lot,
so the land has always been bulkheaded. Also, it was determined
that there was 35 feet of the lot which was on the creek on the bay
and that was assessed at $85,000. The first issue is, if you look at
the lot it' s self, the eastern most portion is a very narrow piece
that sticks out into the bay with the creek on one side and a little
bit of bay frontage, not really useful for anything. Now, what I did
was I looked at the assessed values of the land of the contiguous
lots, one of them being on the creek, and the other two lots being on
the bay. In looking at, basically the calculations on the Assessors
worksheet, it showed me that the assessed values came about by taking
the frontage on the bay and the frontage on the creek, multiplying
that by a cost per foot, and that determined the land value. So,
basically the bay front area was assessed at $21. 00 a foot. The two
contiguous lots on the bay are assessed at an average of $3 .81 a
foot, so that is way out of line. The creek front was assessed at
$8. 00 a foot. Looking at the contiguous piece of land, this is
assessed a little over $6.00 a foot. It is useful land in that it is
t • 2 •
a commercial marina, and it has room to dock boats on it. It' s got
to be valuable land by the fact that you can dock boats on it. The
creek front area I have is on a very narrow creek and there is no
room to dock boats on. So, basically I maintain that the value of
the land has been re-assessed and is not correct and that it should
be based on the actual value of the comparable lot on either side of
it. Then what I did was, I took the numbers that I came up with,
which I think is a fair assessment, and as a validity check, I took
the comparable piece of land across the creek from mine, and I
multiplied out how much was on the bay, how much was on the creek,
and it came out to less then 10% of the assessed value of the land.
Mr. Sullivan: Of what land?
Mr. Schultheis: The piece across the creek from us.
Mr. Sullivan: I can understand that because I came out with less
than 10% of the value of that land.
Mr. Schultheis: The piece across the creek was assessed at $900.
Based on the numbers that I think are fair to assess my lot at, if I
run that calculation, it would say that it should be assessed at
about $987. So basically, my argument is that in bringing my lot
into conformance with the contiguous lot as well as the lot across
the creek, the assessment needs to change. If anyone is interested
in the photographs of the bulkhead of the 30' s, I 've got them. It' s
a copy of an aerial photo taken before the 1938 Hurricane.
Mr. Sullivan: So what you did, is you replaced the bulkhead?
Mr. Schultheis: Yes.
Mr. Sullivan: When did you do that?
Mr. Schultheis: In 1987 and 1988, and subsequent to that there was
a Building Permit for work and there was an assessment done on the
house of $400 in the 1988 time frame.
Mr. Burdy: Can you hold on please?
Mr. Sullivan: Do you have another copy of this?
Mr. Schultheis: You can make a copy.
Mr. Sullivan: Make a copy please. Sit down before you do that. Any
comment from the Assessors?
Mr. Scott: Yes Mr. Chairman, the assessment at $6,200 represents
using the 3 . 24 E.Q. Rate for a value of $191,358. Mr. Schultheis
purchased the property in 1987 for $275,000 and he approximately put
$11,000 into the house according to the Building Permit. We are not
assessing according to the price of the sale. We did go there
according to Building Permits in 1989, which we adjusted on the house
then, based on the Building Permits, replace and renovate a lot of
3
f ,
old wood. That' s when we saw that the bulkheading on the third
side of the property was evident. That' s when we noticed it. Also,
there is a dockage on that side which we are not assessing. It' s a
semi-pennisula type, he' s got three sides. What we did was we
assessed on the basis of $21.00 a front foot for the bay portion of
it, which does have a salability which was not taken into
consideration before. We did put a value of $8. 00 a front foot for
the bulkheaded section along the canal and we do offer into
evidence that the parcel he was talking about, which is directly
across the way known as 1000-117-5-14.2, is at $20.00 a front foot as
an unbuildable piece of property. In addition, the two particular
contiguous parcels that he is talking about, that are assessed at
$600.00 each, in our opinion, are not buildable. They are very
narrow, based on a piece of property which as far as we know, can not
be built upon. There was a minimal assessment put on them. If they
were able to build on them, there would be a re-evaluation on that
basis and we would be able to change that. In addition, there is
another piece of property which is across the canal which is of a
similar nature, where it has both bay frontage and canal frontage,
and that is assessed at $21. 00 a front foot for the bay and $16.00 a
foot for the canal so we thought where it was a re-evaluation, it was
in keeping with the value of the property and not excessive by means
of comparison of other people in the area. The one I was talking
about is 1000-117-5-14. 2, and if you would like to have any of these,
I ' ll give them to you.
Mr. Sullivan: Did I understand you correctly to say that there was
additional bulkhead added?
Mr. Scott: It' s on three sides sir. What we did was we cut the bay
35 feet like a pan-handle. It gives them access out to the bay which
does have a value. Then there was 190 some odd feet along the canal,
then there was bulkheading again that came back in about 48 feet.
Mr. Schultheis: About 35. On the bay, it' s not a bulkhead, it' s a
groin.
Mr. Scott: No, I 'm talking about the inside on the lagoon portion.
Mr. Schultheis: 35 feet which has always been there.
Mr. Scott: Which we didn' t assess at all, because of the fact that
we didn' t want to make it excessive. We only did two sides, the
smallest portion of it, and where the major portion of the value
comes through, which is the canal.
Mr. Sullivan: What they re-assessed is only replacement?
Mr. Scott: We didn' t re-assess that portion at all sir. It brought
evidence to the fact that it was more than a two sided value. He had
$1,100 total on the land and it wasn't $1,100. It brings a value of
about $33,900 to the land and we don' t think that is in keeping with
that particular area with that amount of waterfront. This is a copy
r • 4
•
of the two that I offered in comparison directly across the way with
the rates on there for the waterfront.
Mr. Sullivan: Mr. Schultheis, do you have anything further?
Mr. Schultheis: Well the fact that there might be other parcels
that are assessed, interradially enters into the equation. I think
the important information here is what the assessment is of, and the
contiguous parcels basically surrounding the lot that I have. I
could also reference the fact that if I look at block number 7 lot
#31 has 100 feet which is bulkheaded on the bay and that' s assessed
at $500. That's $5. 00 a foot.
Mr. Sullivan: Is that in the comparison?
Mr. Schultheis: Yes. It' s just a different piece of information.
Mr. Sullivan: Any further questions?
Board: No further questions.
Mr. Sullivan: Thank you Mr. Schultheis, you will be hearing from
us as soon as possible.
2) 1001-4-7-16
Pat & Paul Kulsziski
433 Main Street
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Burdy: Do you solemnly swear that the information you give
herein will be given accurately and truthfully to the best of your
ability?
Mr. Kulsziski: I do. Our income tax statement for 1992 basically
showed that our business has almost doubled in one year. It is still
very difficult to make a profit and that is just the business. It
has five rooms which are rentable and we have a very short season.
We are very busy during the summer months, June, July, and August,
but the rest of the year there is no business in Greenport as we are
asking you to base your assessment on the income producing value of
that property rather then the square footage.
Mr. Sullivan: What is it you are looking for? You don't have
anything filled out on this form.
Mr. Kulsziski: Which one are you looking for?
Mr. Sullivan: I 'm looking at page 3 .
Mr. Kulsziski: I thought if I filled out item six it would cover
it.
5 ••
> > e
Mr. Sullivan: So what are you looking for? This is what we have to
Know.
Mr. Kulsziski: I guess it is going to come under paragraph B which
is a separate assessment, I 'm trying to see something in compliance
here.
Mr. Russell: On the front page of number six there is a mistake so
that the total assessment is $9,700 and if you take a look at the
property record card, you will see that the assessment was reduced
last year by the Grievance Board to $8,900 and it has not been
changed by the Board of Assessors this year. So the $9,700 is
incorrect, $8,900 is what it was changed to last year and it has
remained the same way.
Mr. Kulsziski: I don' t have a copy of that information. The tax
bills that I 've received from my mortgage company show the
information that I have recorded on the first page here.
Mr. Sullivan: Tell us what you want here Mr. Kulsziski?
Mrs. Kulsziski: What we want to do is be able to have a profit in
the business.
Mr. Sullivan: I understand that, but what do you want, you have to
tell us on this Board. I guess it would come under C, Improper
Calculations of Transitions of Assessments. Sir, what we are asking
you to do is to tell us, we can not tell you what you are going to
get. You have to come to us and say this assessment is defective
because, and we are looking to get our assessment of. . .
Mr. Kulsziski: O.K. I told you the cause, but I didn' t tell you
what I 'm looking for. Can we recess for a minute and come back in a
little bit?
Mr. Sullivan: Take this, and in the meantime we' ll hear somebody
else. O.K. Thank you.
Mr. Kulsziski returning: I apologize, apparently there has been
some confusion here, but last time I appeared at a Grievance, I was
not asked to propose an assessed value. I thought that was something
that the Board did. I just grieved the fact that I feel the taxes
are too high based on the income for the property. I didn' t fill
this in here, but I will fill this in, in front of you if that is
O.K. The figure here according to Bob, and that's shown on the
record, is $8,900.
Mr. Sullivan: We just wanted you to tell us what you wanted. Any
questions from the Board?
Board: No your Honor.
Mr. Scott: The only thing I would like to state is that they
originally purchased the house for $225,000 and they added an
• 6 •
addition for $150,000. The other thing is that, while the Statement
of Income is a Statement of Income, it does not offer any proof of
value. We request that the $8, 900 be upheld.
Mr. Kulsziski: I would just like to count the fact that the value
of the property to produce income, and at this phase of it' s business
life, it is not producing much income. As we all know, business is
very seasonal in this town. We've been open 12 months a year, 52
weeks last year. That' s the amount of income we've been able to
derive from the property.
Mrs. Kulsziski: Also we had our home assessed. We tried to
refinance, but because we live there and our business is there, we
could not get refinancing at a low interest rate because it was
considered to be commercial. When we had our home re-assessed, it
was re-assessed for $250,000. That' s what it was assessed for and we
had valued our home, what we paid for it plus the addition, but
nobody else does. Our home is not worth that.
Mr. Scott: I just want to say that in addition to the income that it
brought in, it is a primary residence for the Kulsziski' s and it
could be brought into effect. They're bringing a basis of income
alone, but it is a living residence for them as well.
Mr. Sullivan: Thank you. Any more questions?
Board: No questions.
3 ) 1000-104-4-32
John P.A. & Christine D. Marcin
34 Harvard Street
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Mr. Burdy: So you solemnly swear that the information you give
herein will be given accurately and truthfully to the best of your
ability?
Mrs. Marcin: Yes, my feelings are, I think the letter is self
explanatory. I 'm here to rectify an inspection. The other thing I
wanted to mention. . .
Mr. Sullivan: Everybody hasn't seen that letter.
Mrs. Marcin: What do you want me to do?
Mr. Sullivan: Just give us a brief of what it says.
Mrs. Marcin: We own a residence at 7065 Bay Avenue in Cutchogue.
We still don' t have a Certificate of Occupancy. We did our
remodeling in 1988. Our contractor has refused to do any work and we
are in the process of litigation which is on going. We have
undertaken the construction work ourselves as much as we can. It' s a
burden to rectify all this, and we are not sure, quite frankly, what
111
will have to be done in order to qualify for a Certificate of
Occupancy. We have never been able to find that out so we are
working on our own as best we can to try and get the house up to
standards to get that Certificate. Because we do not have a
Certificate of Occupancy, we do not have a marketable house at this
time. For that reason, we feel our assessment does not reflect that
property. I am here to ask that our assessment be reduced.
Mr. Sullivan: Does the Board of Assessors have anything to say?
Mr. Russell: Yes, first we would like to point out that the
Certificate of Occupancy is irrelevant to the marketability of a
home. Many of the houses in the town of Southold don't have C.O. ' s
because they were built prior to the requirements of C.O. ' s, but
there is still real property value that is there. Secondly, we would
like you to look at the real property value that is submitted and we
have the dates of the Opinion of Value of 1989. The engineer' s
report is 1988. We have a letter from Mr. Lessard dated 1988. That
is a significant amount of time ago and there has certainly been a
lot of change made, knowing that I go by there all the time, that
there is a value there. If the $6,200 isn' t reasonable and it is
contradictory, we would be happy to sit down with the owner and
discuss what is left to be done on the house. From exterior view,
the house is completed and has assessment marketability on the real
estate market and the value commences with the assessment that is on
it. We really have to look at the date of everything, fitness of the
same information that is being submitted every year. It' s five years
later, it' s time, to look at what is done now. I would also like to
point out that they do have full use of that home as does anybody out
here that has a house out here although they do not have a C.O. , they
have full use of it. It is certainly a real property value.
Mrs. Marcin: What is your name sir?
Mr. Russell: Scott Russell, Board of Assessors.
Mrs. Marcin: The conditions that I stated in all these documents
are what is present today. In Dec. of 1988 Mr. Lessard, who was then
the Chief Building Inspector, told me I would not get a Certificate
of Occupancy. One has never been issued. Anytime we have asked what
must we do in order to qualify, because I have a suit against the
town of Southold, I am told I am not allowed to approach the Building
Department to find out, so we are working through the attorney, who
is representing the town, and we still can't get a nailed-down list
of what has to be done. We on our own are doing the best we can to
try and do what we think will qualify for a C.O. That is the first
time I 've heard that someone is going to actually tell me what is
left to do to get a Certificate of Occupancy. Now, while I
appreciate the fact that you like my house when you drive by it and
we try to maintain the outside as best we can, not being there all
the time, I cannot sell my house tomorrow. If I am in dire financial
straits two months from now, who is going to buy my house without a
Certificate of Occupancy? My other point, and it is a very valid
point, to come before the Board of Assessment Review with the fact
8411
that I do not have a C. of O. I believe that the New York Board of
Equalization and Assessment does use that as a basis. I think that I
have a valid statement to make when I say that I have an unmarketable
house without a C. of O. and that should be reflected in my
assessment. I do not have the use of my house to do with what I will
as any other citizen without that C. of O. My house will never pass
title to someone else without that C. of O. I 'm working to get that
C. of O. , until that time, I come before you to ask you for relief.
Mr. Russell: I would like to add that the Certificate of Occupancy
and the E.Q. Differential makes no determination to the assignability
of a house because of a C.O. , or having no C.O. A couple of weeks
ago, most of you gentlemen were in attendance at the training seminar
which specifically stated by the representative from Equalization
Assessment that the C.O. is irrelevant to the real property value of
the house. Furthermore, it does not mean that the house is not
sellable. Also, I don' t just drive by, we did a thorough
investigation of the house from the exterior. Most of the pictures
that are submitted here are not in their present state of condition.
Most of these repairs have been done. There has been a significant
amount of work that has been done. Again, if it doesn't deserve
assessment at full value, I would be happy to consider a happy medium
if the owner was to sit down and say this is what we've got done,
this is what we've got to do, but it clearly has a lot of work that
has been done over the past five years, and it' s a real property
value that has to be reflected in the assessment.
Mrs. Marcin: I was not at the same session so you have me at a
disadvantage, but I did speak with someone who was at the same
session and my information from that person was diametrically imposed
from what I am hearing here. As I say, I was not present, so it was
here-say. But I was told that was basically the basis for the
assessment. Yes, we have done work to the outside of the house, such
as raising recently the chimney height which was in violation. All
these things that were in violation, let me tell you, someone had
said we were O.K. for a C.O. , although that was not issued to me. We
found out that we certainly had violations and we are working to fix
them. We have done things to fix the height of the steps and there
is still work to be done inside and no one has inspected that.
Mr.Russell: If I may address the Board one more time, the question
of the C.O. can always be reconciled by the simply viewing of the
case. The state provides a recording of that session and then in
that particular you will see that the representative said that it is
irrelevant. The second issue is, that we really have to look at the
value that is established. What is the value today? She is
submitting an appraisal, or not even, but a letter of opinion that is
dated 1989 from a licensed real estate broker who has passed away a
couple of years ago. That is the burden of proof she has to over
come.
Mrs. Marcin: I can understand that I think property values were up
then they came down, which is why I didn't ask the real estate
brokers to look at it again. When it went like this, I think I might
• 9 •
be on an average now. That' s why I think that the price and property
value holds true. If you require me to get another appraisal, then
I ' ll have to do it, and I 'm willing to do that, but we' ll still come
down to the appraisal of what the land is worth.
Mr. Sullivan: Mrs. Marcin, do you have a list of all these
violations from the Building Department?
Mrs. Marcin: No.
Mr. Sullivan: Have you tried to get them?
Mrs. Marcin: Yes.
Mr. Sullivan: You cannot obtain them?
Mrs. Marcin: No.
Mr. Sullivan: Mr. English Jr. , any questions?
Mr. English Jr. : No, no further questions.
Mr. Russell: One other thing I would like to mention is that I do
believe this is an on going litigation, a case between these people
and the Building Department. I would ascertain that the Board of
Assessors is a separate body. We have a function to do, and that is
to assess the property at its current value. The improvement to the
property, whether it is new or not, has a value. We can assess a
home under construction clearly when it doesn't have a C.O.
Mr. Sullivan: Any further questions?
Board: No.
4) 1000-52-1-8
Mr. & Mrs. Varujan Arslanyan
1055 River Road
Edgewater, N.J. 07020
Mr. Burdy: Do you solemnly swear that the information you give
herein will be given accurately and truthfully to the best of your
ability?
Mr. Arslanyan: I do. Your Honor, I purchased this house in 1982
and eight years live in the house and the ninth year, because it was
a small house, only one toilet, and I decided to demolish and build
my dream house as I designed the house. I submitted to the town the
blueprints and they gave me the permits and I did a personal
appraisal and end of the year that I started the house to demolish,
that is 1989. I demolished and put the foundation, the town came in
and stopped me by saying this house can' t be built here, it has to be
moved back 60 feet. And then, of course we went for our variance,
• 10110
they realize they made a mistake. They misinterpreted the building
lot, instead of from the high-tide water mark being 100 feet, they
were thinking should be from the tip of the bluff which is about 40
to 45 feet away. They gave me a permit to continue to build the
house, and I 'm still building the house. But they denied me my
swimming pool and my deck. Since then, two attorneys and a person
who is following my papers is still fighting with the city. We have
no jurisdiction actions from the Department of Environmental Control
and this time in Dec. we had a storm and my land which is 19 feet
above the sea which has been taken quite a bit away and I charged a
bulkhead to the bill. The bulkhead has been granted but the deck and
swimming pool is still in town for whatever the proper board or
departments are still dragging their feet and I don't have service.
Therefore, my house is not finished. My argument here, respectfully,
is if you could see the mistakes discussed, and give me a copy of my
past taxes and what is fair, but is unobservable for me financially
speaking, I am 64 years old, I have intentions to retire here. This
is unobservable, unpayable fee for me. It is 400 some odd per cent
more then what I paid for last year, until now, $4,200 that I 'm
paying until now, I don't have an appeal. I am not denying my
obligation, however town and agencies are cause of this delay. I 'm a
good standing citizen and I 've been paying my lot for a good many
years and I had a house. Now I have no house. I spend my money.
Times are very bad, financially speaking and income for life speaking
and I am unable to continue with this kind of burden as I said my age
and diminishing income and prevailing very hard conditions in the
market place.
Mr. Scott: Yes, Mr. Chairman, first of all, on page one where it
says the total assessed value of the property, it is incorrect. He
says it' s $18,100 and we have $14,000 as you can see by the property
records sir. And while Mr. Arslanyan has no C.O. , as Mr. Russell
said in the last case, we have to take into effect what the present
state of completion is. We did take a look at that, and if you look
in the last page of the property records chart, you will see that 25%
was taken off of the back of that page. On the very bottom you' ll
see for completion, 25% so we are taking into effect that the house
is not complete and we have removed 25% of the total improvements
from the assessment. In addition, Mr. Arslanyan, has not offered
any proof to the contrary of the value the Assessors have put on the
property. There was a sale up on Soundview Avenue Extension on
2-13-92, which was 50-2-6 for a smaller ranch with only 110 feet of
waterfront and that went for $530,000. He has 150 feet of waterfront
on the Sound.
Mr. Arslanyan: I don't have 150 feet on the Sound, only 100 feet.
Mr. Scott: I 'm sorry, he is correct. According to our calculations,
there' s approximately 4,616 square feet of livable area when it is
completed. It is a considerable size house, we're assessing the
house presently as the value of about $432,000 as interpreted by the
State Board of Equalization and Assessments. I am sorry that Mr.
Arslanyan doesn't have the ability to pay, but we can' t assess on
that basis. That' s all I have.
010
11
Mr. Sullivan: Do you have any questions?
Mr. Arslanyan: Your Honor, my spending says now the city is
different because I am not enjoying my money and spending. I am the
spender, and I am not getting anything in return. They are getting
their return as the more then double off the previous years when that
house was not there. I am the one who is suffering because of the
town and the department' s fault. Not to offend them because they
earn their fee, I am the one, my is not being returned, not
the town and not the Tax Department. I am paying my taxes as they
are telling me. But now 400% they raise them. I would like to
submit this, Mr. Scott told me when the $18,000 came from this other
Friday, to fulfill this $3,400 for the land and $14,700. This is his
handwriting, and this is why I took it at $18,100.
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman, what Mr. Arslanyan asked when he came
into the office was what the assessment would be on the house when
completed. That' s an estimate of what the taxes will be when the
house is finished and the 25% is off. So we are assessing him now on
the basis of the 75% completion to the improvement and the land which
is not seen at all. If you' ll take a look, what you have in your
hand is an estimate for the future. It' s an estimate, it' s not for
this particular tax here, it' s what he asked me to make him when I
was sitting there with him. The other thing is that if you look at
the property record card, you' ll see that when it was $7,900 in 1982
and he demolished the house and he put a foundation on it in 1991,
we gave him a $500 parcel, the land has stayed consistent since 1982
at $3 ,200. In 1992, they had done considerable work on it. We
increased the amount of the parcel for the improvement and this year
there was a considerable amount of work done on it so we had to go
and look at it, so we raised it to $10,835. There' s a natural
progression to the manner of the assessment. The yellow paper is
pertinent to Mr. Arslanyan for the future, but it is not pertinent
to Mr. Arslanyan to the matter of the assessment at hand, which is
the $14,000.
Mr. Sullivan: O.K. This is for the completion?
Mr. Russell: That' s after it is finished.
Mr. Sullivan: Is this a single family house?
Mr. Arslanyan: It' s only four bedrooms. Your Honor, if I may say
this house is not from my opinion, house is not in use. House is not
permitted to use for my use, seeing as I have suffered enough burden,
and I love this area, and they are not giving me the privilege to
come and enjoy my house. I had a house. With their permission, I
demolished my house. I wanted to build a new house. I was willing
to pay the new taxes, of course I was thinking it would be more
taxes. But your Honor, this is not a normal thing. I never dreamed
this could be, and he' s telling me my not being able to pay is my
problem. It is easy for him to say that 75% of the house is done,
75% of what, unusable house. I don' t have permits. I can't live in
it legally. It' s an illegal house. They don't have a point on me to
12411
say I did something wrong there. I did everything with their
permits, they changed their minds. I 'm suffering two years enough
your Honor.
Mr. Sullivan: Who changed their minds?
Mr. Arslanyan: The city, I have blueprints and everything to build
the house and they approved. After I started to build, I demolished
my existing house, and I put my foundation and they said stop. They
made a mistake. Instead of house should be from high-water mark,
they said from the bluff should be considered. I'm suffering very
considerably your Honor, I wish you would show me courtesy of
understanding my situation that I am in. I 'm going to an attorney to
protect my rights, and then I found out they did issue me, 29 of last
month, court issued me the permit for my bulkhead. But they said my
permit which was issued two years ago, given to me, was old. Now we
have to go back, start like I 'm looking for my tale, turning same
place and still I have no papers to get into the house and do as I
planned to do, conduct my life.
Mr. Sullivan: Thank you, any questions?
Board: No question from the Board.
5) 1000-117-4-26
William J. Sullivan
945 Fanning Rd. Box 317
New Suffolk, N.Y. 11956
Mr. W. Sullivan: Mr. Chairman?
Mr. Burdy: Do you solemnly swear that the information you give
herein will be given accurately and truthfully to the best of your
ability?
Mr. W. Sullivan: I do. Chairman, gentlemen of the Board, I had
submitted a complaint on unequal taxes. I also submitted a diagram
here which I have copies of.
Mr. Sullivan: What diagram is that sir?
Mr. W. Sullivan: Of the adjacent property. I submitted that diagram
of my property to the adjacent property, but I want to point out my
neighbors, I 'm really friendly with them, so I don' t want to affect
their taxes in any shape or form. I 'm only interested in my own. As
you can see from the diagram here, the adjacent houses to me, looking
to the one on the right, 117-4-25 assessed at $2,500. Most of the
land around here is equal on the homes. All the property I 'm
speaking about has homes on it. The one to the right of me has a
total assessment of $2,500, the one on the left to me is assessed at
$3 ,500, going down the line $5,300, and the corner house is $3 ,900
and opposite to him is $5,300. Now directly behind me, going to the
northwest, this house is assessed at $1,700. The land is assessed at
411 13
$200 and it looks like it' s half vacant. There is a shed and things
like that. The house to the right of me has a trailer home on it.
My complaint is, I think, I have unequal taxes. Now that' s up to you
people to decide.
Mr. Sullivan: Comments from anybody? Does the Board of Assessors
have any comments?
Mr. Scott: Yes sir, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Sullivan has a house that
represents 1,581 square feet. I agree with Mr. Sullivan that the
lands appears to be fairly equally assessed on all of them. Mr.
Sullivan' s, of all the houses in the area, his is the largest one.
His assessment is $6,300. Mr. Martin' s across the street, is 1,485
square feet and his assessment is $6,800 and that represents because
the swimming pool is the addition on that one. The one of Howard' s
next door, is 616 square feet which is a considerable difference from
a 1,581 square feet. The other assessments, such as Mr. Kostakis, is
only 936 square feet and his assessment is $3 ,500. So you have about
650 square feet of living space that isn't represented on Mr.
Sullivan' s. Mr. Bogavic next to Mr. Kostakis, is 1,134 square feet
and it' s $5,300, so I think you see a pattern that there is not
unequal assessment because it is according to the square footage and
I submit that it is not unfairly assessed. There is no reflection, I
like the Sullivans as much as anybody else in the neighborhood.
Board: What was the size of the Howard?
Mr. Scott: The Howard house is 616 square feet.
Mr. Sullivan: Mr. W. Sullivan, would you please address the Board.
Mr. W. Sullivan: There' s a trailer home on there too. There is also
a shed in the back. I would think a $2,500 assessment, logically, it
doesn't seem correct to me.
Mr. Sullivan: How many square feet is the house?
Mr. W. Sullivan: Which one?
Mr. Sullivan: Howard' s.
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman, according to the property record card, it' s
616 square feet, I would submit that the last Building Permit issued
to the Howard residence was 1971. If there has been additional work
on the property, such as make it into a two story house, which we
have no knowledge of that, it was done without a C.O. , or if there' s
a trailer on there that they put on there without our knowledge, and
they are using it as such, then maybe the Department of Board of
Assessors should take a look at it and reflect that change.
Mr. W. Sullivan: That' s just exactly what I didn't want to get
into. I don't want to get into a contest where I have to point out
something, and it would go to them and get back to me and I would be
• 14 ".
on some kind of a bad list. I don't want to get involved in any of
that. If it meant getting involved in that, I would just withdraw.
Mr. Scott: Mr. W. Sullivan, if there is a reference to the Howard
assessment being unequal based on having a knowledge of what the
improvements have been, then that can't be used as a comparable.
Mr. Sullivan: Do you have anything else Mr. W. Sullivan?
Mr. W. Sullivan: No, that' s about all.
Mr. Sullivan: Does the Board have anymore questions? Thank you very
much, you' ll be hearing from us as soon as possible.
Mr. W. Sullivan: Thank you gentlemen.
6) 1000-101-1-16. 2
Frances Slezak & Alf Sommerstad
7405 Alvahs Lane
Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935
Mr. Sullivan: Do we have a copy of the application here?
Mr. Burdy: Is there just one name?
Mr. Sullivan: No, there are two names.
Mr. Burdy: Do you solemnly swear that the information you give
herein will be given accurately and truthfully to the best of your
ability?
Mr. Slezak: I do. My complaint is that we feel the house is over
valued. We purchased it three and a half years ago for $170,000 and
refinanced six months ago at which time we had a bank appraisal of
$175,000. It' s assessed at $219,000, a discrepancy of about
$44,000. I realize that the bank sometimes tend to be conservative
in their appraisals, but based on these figures, I feel that it is
over valued.
Mr. Sullivan: Any comments from the Board?
Mr. Russell: Yes, we just wanted to point out one thing, not just to
this case, but to the larger picture, the bank appraisals do as you
said tend to be conservative, but there is a range of value that we
have to consider. Quite honestly, if you ask me $219,000, is it too
high, probably. Is $175,000 too low, it' s conservative. We would
like to ask you to consider a happy medium between those two and
recognize that these are called quick sale appraisals and they are
the low end of value for those homes. One other thing I want to
point out, just so the gentleman understands, is that the $219,000
while it is too high, I do like to think it' s because of the
erroneous ratio provided by the state as opposed to ours that doesn't
practice it.
111 15 •
Mr. Sullivan: What are you recommending, that $175,000 is too low?
Mr. Russell: I think it is conservative. I think $219,000 is too
inflationary and $175,000 is too conservative. I 'm not really
recommending a settlement, I 'm just asking that you consider the
nature of the bank appraisal if you consider an adjustment for this
settlement.
Mr. Sullivan: Any questions?
Board: Just one question Mr. Slezak, do you own the adjoining
property?
Mr. Slezak: I realize the banks tend to be conservative, but still
in today' s market, in this economy, I think $219,000 is much too high.
Mr. Sullivan: O.K. fine, you will be hearing from us.
Mr. Slezak: Thank you very much for your time.
7) 1000-95-4-18. 32
William T. Lademann
P.O. Box 1030
Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935
Mr. Burdy: Do you solemnly swear that the information you give
herein will be given accurately and truthfully to the best of your
ability?
Mr. Lademann: I do.
Mr. Sullivan: What do you have to say to the Board?
Mr. Scott: Can I save some time?
Mr. Sullivan: If you want.
Mr. Scott: The Assessors agree with the reduction request of Mr.
Lademann of $6,200.
Mr. Sullivan: Do you agree with that Mr. Lademann?
Mr. Lademann: Fine.
Mr. Russell: He did his homework, he gave us so much information
it' s obvious.
Mr. Sullivan: There is no worry to that one.
Board: No questions, reduced to $6,200.
8) 1000-110-8-32. 9
• 16 .
Thomas Wickham
P.O. Box 928
Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935
Mr. Wickham: Can I make a brief statement?
Mr. Sullivan: We would rather have the application first so we know
what you are talking about, that' s the only reason. I know you' re
going to be definitive and precise, but while you're talking, if we
see something and it' s as it should be, then we have to call it to
your attention. It will only be a minute.
Mr. Burdy: Do you solemnly swear that the information you give
herein will be given accurately and truthfully to the best of your
ability?
Mr. Wickham: I do. I would just like to make an opening statement
that this in fact is every respect support land, and this is what the
argument is about. It qualifies under the law as support land. It
is important that your Board recognize that I built up the barrier
beach from an elevation of five feet to an elevation in excess of
eight feet, and this is the first line of defense against storm tides
and my 4,000 feet of dikes on that side of the farm. In this Dec.
12, storm, had it not been for that beach and that berm that I put
up, the tide would have come over my dikes in tremendous volume and
would have put two feet of salt water over New Suffolk highway and
would have made New Suffolk completely inaccessible for emergency
vehicles. I might add that in the winter storm of 1936, there was a
foot of salt water over New Suffolk land and this tide was at least a
foot higher in Cutchogue. It might not have been in some other
places, but this is the first time that water has gone over the top
of that dike since the dikes were built in 1944. Had it not been for
that berm on the beach, it certainly would have breached my dikes in
several places and completely flooded the farm and New Suffolk land,
and when I say the farm, it would have meant something like 120 acres
inundated with salt water.
Mr. Bressler: What we've got here this morning gentlemen, is an
application for an agricultural exemption for a portion of John
Wickham' s farm. That' s what' s before you. The reason it is before
you is because for the first time in approximately sixteen years, the
Assessors have denied this agricultural exemption for this portion of
John Wickham's farm. It has been an agricultural strip dedicated
to agricultural use and as I say for almost 15 years this has not
been an issue. This is the first year this has come up. Nothing has
changed about this application except for this year something has
changed. What caused the Assessors to do this is something that
really isn't important. I want to point out to you that we have
never been here before, it has been never been a problem. The county
has been happy, the state has been happy, everybody has been happy
for having this stuff in agricultural use. This year the Assessor
says no, this property doesn't qualify and he says the parcel fails
to meet state guide lines and be classified as qualified support
land. Why is that after fifteen years? The simply fact of the
• 17 •
matter is it didn't change. It does qualify as support land. The
dikes protect the agricultural property, they permit the growth of
agricultural products and in fact there is some agricultural products
grown on this parcel. The conversation that my partner had, with the
Assessors office about his motivation of this particular denial this
year, it seems as though there is a focus on this tax parcel, we will
call 32. 9 as we were advised yesterday by the Assessors. It was
formerly 32. 5 and before that it was 32. Now, why do I bring us
through the history? The history of this parcel is important because
if you look at the application on the very last page, you will see a
map of the 1976 tax map here, and you will see that parcel 32,
consisting of 73 . 1 acres. This is property that was acquired by John
Wickham and others by the deed that we have attached to the
application. This is what they got. This is the property that has
been used in agricultural production. This is John Wickham' s
farm. It remains John Wickham' s farm. Over time various things
have happened, nothing that he did. John Wickham' s farm still
remains in the name of John Wickham and other names on the
application and it remains one parcel. It always was one parcel, it
remains one parcel, 32.9 or what use to be 32.5 is an artificial
distinction created by the Assessors and it has nothing to do with
the title of this property. The farm is the farm is the farm.
Now we suspect what may have happened was, that the Assessors, prior
to this group took it upon themselves, when there was a deed of the
development rights of a portion of this property to the county to
start whacking the parcel up into little pieces for tax purposes. It
has nothing to do with the ownership of the farm, one parcel, you can
look at the deed. On that one parcel, agricultural production is
carried out, we all know that. The fruit farm is there and this is a
portion of that parcel and it constituents support land. There is no
basis what so ever, for carving out this one little parcel and saying
you're not entitled to an exemption because there is no production on
it and all it consists of are berms and dikes and other things,
ignoring the fact that there is beach plum production down there. It
seems to me that for the first time the Assessors have attempted to
boot strap their way into knocking out an agricultural exemption on a
portion of this man's property. That' s what' s going on here. They
artificially carved out a piece and said this doesn' t qualify and
that' s not right. You have the deed, you have the old tax map, you
know what goes on this parcel, and we think it is entitled to the
exemption.
Mr. Sullivan: Thank you.
Mr. Wickham: For clarification, may I add one point, this
agricultural production we speak of, for about seven years we first
owned and then leased Ackerly Pond Farm, right here on Ackerly Pond
Lane. It had about a quarter acre of cultivate beach plum. About
five years ago, we were selling pitted beach plums. We have a
mechanical pitter that pits them in quantity. My daughter-in-law and
myself, took a pail full of pits down there, about 1,000, and planted
them on our own property, the barrier beach, where no beach plums had
grown before. Some of them grew, and I might add that beach plums
are very difficult to get started. I have tried several times to
• 18 •
transplant them, but some of these sprouted and grew and in last
Sept. my daughter and grand-daughter harvested some of the crops for
the first time. So there is, small admitted, agricultural
production. The other thing which is rather laughable really, is we
are just going through a situation with Suffolk County Farmland
Preservation Program, in which they will only buy agricultural land
but they are buying our dikes right on the present contract, signed
by both parties, the closing will probably take place in six weeks.
So the dikes themselves, are agricultural property by the Country' s
definitions. This parcel contains about 2,000 feet of agricultural
dikes protecting my main farm, not counting the barrier beach.
Mr. Sullivan: So the Assessors have any comments?
Mr. Russell: Yes, I just want to mention one statue you brought out
against the law. In defining support land, support land means land
constituting a portion of a parcel as identified on an assessment
roll which also contains land qualified to receive an agricultural
assessment. There is no farm land production going on, on that
property. The attorney says that this is all one parcel, the farm
over there, this is the support land, the farm stand, all of this is
one parcel. He said the Assessors arbitrarily divided this parcel,
we decided to create all these separate parcels out of it. I would
like to clarify that by saying that it was Mr. Wickham who chose to
divide these parcels. Last year this parcel was 32.5 acres. It was
Mr. Wickham who decided to convert one acre along the beach there and
put a house on it. This year it was Mr. Wickham who filed a new map
with the town and the county that created another five acres to join
that one acre parcel, leaving the 25 acres left as vacant land.
Single and separate vacant land. It was Mr. Wickham who applied for
a building permit as a single and separate piece of land on his 25
acre property. This is the parcel he submitted as a map for the
Building Department as a single and separate piece of land. It was
Mr. Wickham who carved out the 25 acres. This is no longer part of
the farm. It was Mr. Wickham who developed the building, submitted
the plans for a house on the land. The Assessors looked at all this
information very carefully. We talked with Mr. Wickham on several
occasions on how we were going to reconcile this. This no longer
meets the statute of requirements for real property tax law. The
exemption definition is there. We called other Assessors, we called
Rich DeGiovanna, who is the legal counsel of Equalization Assessment,
who told us legally this does not qualify for support land status.
Admittedly, this is a gray area that the law has never been
addressed. Should this be considered support land, should it not, I
don't know? The law currently doesn' t allow it to be support land,
it doesn' t apply. What we did was we thought we had worked out a
compromise with Mr. Wickham, by saying this no longer qualifies for
exemption, but we will leave the farmland value on this property. By
Mr. Wickham' s own estimate, he sat in Bob' s office and told us this
land was worth about a million dollars. He was only applying for the
building permit to enhance its value, so if they were to sell the
development rights, they would get more from any of these groups that
are in charge of buying the development rights in the front. That
might be fine, and more power to him for getting his fair share of
19
the dollars that it is worth, but he can' t have it both ways. He
can't establish it as a single, separate, buildable parcel, and then
say, but I want my farmland exemption too because this is part of all
the other farming that's going on around here. Single and separate,
the law does allow for it. Also, one thing I would like you to
consider is that right now this is before the Legal Counsel in
Albany, The Agricultural and Market Commissioner, and The Evaluation
Services Director, who' s name is Mark Twentymen. I 've talked to Mark
Twentymen, I 've talked to Rich Degiovanna, they are settling this
issue now, they are going to issue an opinion on this. They said
technically it does not qualify, however, they will issue an opinion,
addressing this whole issue, and what should be done in the future to
reconcile these disagreements. I would ask the Grievance Board of
Assessment Review to please reserve any decision on this until that
decision is forthcoming from the state. It's information that I
cannot put forth.
Mr. Sullivan: The information is fine, but the request, no.
Mr. Russell: O.K. It is supporting evidence that I need.
Mr. Sullivan: I understand that, the information is fine. We will
take that into consideration.
Mr. Bressler: Least the Board be left with an erroneous impression,
of Mr. Russell's presentation, there is no single, separate lot
here. To our proof, we have shown you documents which relate to an
application. There is no sub-division that has been applied for or
has been issued. And presumable, in connection with an application
for a Building Permit, a subdivision application would have to be
made. These facts have been gently brushed aside. The simple fact
of the matter is that an application for a Building Permit does not
create a single and separate lot. We all know that. Mr. Russell
knows that. The simple fact that he sketched out a piece of his
overall parcel, and said, I would like a Building Permit there,
doesn' t make it single and separate. What it makes it, is the proper
subject for a subdivision in front of the Planning Board. It seems
to me that the cart has been put before the horse and the Assessors
say, we have a single and separate parcel. We do not. There is no
evidence before you that is single and separate, in fact what is
before you is the deed. It is not single and separate. It never
was, and it isn't now. Should Mr. Wickham decide to go forward to
ask for a Building Permit on a separate piece, he will have to
subdivide it. We know what, the Assessors know that too. I think it
is somewhat disingenuous to sit here and tell this Board that it is
something that he did that created a separate tax lot. He mentioned
several acres that was deeded off to someone else, I told you about
that. That' s over here, that' s not the subject of this application.
What he doesn't tell you, is that there is no subdivision. There
never was a subdivision, he didn' t create lot 32.5 or 32.9 as it is
now known, he didn' t do anything to create that tax lot. Here you
have it, they jumped the gun, they drew the line, they were
premature, and now the Assessors are saying, well he applied for a
permit. Yes, he applied for a permit, but he will not get it without
• 20 •
a subdivision. The deeds are in front of you, there is no evidence
of the contemplation. But in deed, the questions I dare say, the
Assessors would submit that there has been no subdivision. There is
no subdivision. There is a proposed application, somebody jumped the
gun here. It may very well be that they may be asking for opinions
and they may be doing this and they may be doing that, but it' s one
parcel. There is no way anybody here, neither us nor the Assessors
nor this Board, can escape that conclusion. That is the fact and
that is the basis of the application.
Mr. Sullivan: The section that you said is up here, that is
separate, where is that up here?
Mr. Bressler: What I got here is a map, and this is a map survey for
the County of Suffolk, Department of Land Management. This is the
subject parcel that we are arguing about here today. That is what
Mr. Russell referred to as creative subdivision.
Mr. Sullivan: I just wanted to see where it was.
Mr. Bressler: This all remains the same.
Mr. Sullivan: 66 acres are now a separate tax lot?
Mr. Bressler: There seems to be a lot of this going on here. You've
got separate tax lots all over the place, yet it' s all in common
ownership. That seems to me to be a bootstrap.
Mr. Sullivan: But it was taken out of the deed that you submitted to
us.
Mr. Wickham: Let me point out that when you are selling the
development rights to the County of Suffolk, they put a line on there
and delineate and make a special tax parcel, they did it, we didn' t.
The other point is, there was a comment about another parcel, I 'm 85
years old, and being mindful of the uncertainty to this life, I
conveyed out my one sixth interest in a portion of this 62 acres, to
my daughter. To our surprise, the County said, we have to put a line
on the map, and they did.
Mr. Sullivan: They made another parcel out of it?
Mr. Bressler: That was something that was done, in this case,
nothing was done.
Mr. Sullivan: The parcel that you are talking about, that went into
the land preservation?
Mr. Bressler: First one, those 32 acres.
Mr. Sullivan: Yes, O.K.
Mr. Wickham: The laughable thing about this, is that for two years
we have been negotiating with the Town of Southold to sell them, the
110 21411
Open Space Committee, the development rights to this barrier beach.
There is 800 feet of beautiful Peconic Bay beach and I think the Town
of Southold ought to own it. The Open Space Committee was quite
receptive and said we' ll have to have it appraised. There appraisal
came in for slightly less then $100,000 and one of my acquaintances
told me that the property was worth $1,000,000 because there are two
building lots out there. So, I came to Town Hall and I spoke to the
people down here and they say, why don't you get a building permit on
that property because that will establish value, and so we started.
I talked to the Assessor, I talked to the Trustees, I talked to the
Planning Board, and I talked to the Building Department. They all
knew that I was negotiating to sell the development rights to the
town and I 'm told it' s no news to anybody that I 'm disenchanted with
the New York D.E.C. because they took some waterfront property on
Mattituck Inlet and paid us sixteen cents on the dollar of what our
appraisal was. I have no confidence in them, I have tried working
with the County of Suffolk, and they say after offering them the
development rights on this end property, we have no money. The Town
of Southold is interested, so I come back to the Town and they say,
why don't you get a Building Permit to establish value. The minute
the Assessors saw this figure, we get a change of assessment and
gentlemen, I don't think it is fair.
Mr. Sullivan: O.K. So that' s the ticket.
Mr. Bressler: Well, that' s certainly one explanation.
Mr. Sullivan: In selling the development rights to the County of
Suffolk, the one deed had to be made into two deeds?
Mr. Bressler: No, the deed and the land remain the same. We did not
divide the property.
Mr. Russell: I just want to show you, he did the maps in 1976. This
is last year' s map of the property, the new one is in fact created
through a deed. They don' t sell the whole bundle of rights to the
county, but they do sell the rights that include building it. By
virtue of that, it' s a single and separate parcel. This map also,
doesn't show yet, because he just filed a new map that shows that he
split off the piece of property that extends up from the corner there
that engulfs the beach front cottage. He says it' s all one parcel,
but on his application he says no it' s not, it' s a 25.1 acre parcel,
single andseparate vacant land. If this was all one parcel, he
would have said it was a 63 acre parcel, with a house already on it,
but he doesn't say that to the Building Dept. He' s going to them and
telling them one thing, he' s coming to us and telling us something
else, so how do we make sense of this? He also filed a deed that
created the new parcel last year, this was his request to keep the
seven acres along this side, out of the exemption program. We kept
it out by his request. The remaining property, the 25. 1 acres, we
didn' t honestly think it met the statue of requirements to get an
exemption. We left assessed values on most of it at $25 an acre.
The total assessment on this part parcel isn't the $3,400 they have
on the application, but $1,800, $250 for farmland support for ---- to
• 22411
the beach front property, and $25 for the marshland. We tried to
reach a reasonable compromise. All these deeds that have been doing
back and forth, they can argue all day whether it is one parcel or
not, but I think by presenting a map to one office of this town of
our government, they' re recognizing it as single and separate.
They're calling it single and separate, but not when it comes to the
Assessors, because that interferes with their agricultural
exemption. If the law changes to allow us to include it, we will be
happy to, but the law simply doesn't allow it.
Mr. Sullivan: Thank you Mr. Russell.
Mr. Russell: One more thing I want to point out, the Farmland
Exemption Manual defines separate parcels, not by subdivision laws,
but by parcels that are identified as separate and given their own
tax map, that's how the Exemption Law defines it. Also, I would like
to mention that it was Mr. Wickham who put the cart before the horse
by applying for the Building Permit before he applied for a legal
subdivision, but we are not going to get into that issue, it' s not
our concern, we have nothing to do with the subdivision, or the
Zoning, or the Planning, or the Building Department. We have to take
this parcel and assess it at its value on a taxable status base. At
this time it did not qualify, we did everything we could. It didn' t
qualify, it' s only the 25 acre parcel.
Mr. Sullivan: Thank you. Does anyone have any questions?
Board: No.
Mr. Sullivan: I have no further questions on this. Thank you.
9) 1000-115-11-17
Camilla Corso
750 Lupton Point Road
Mattituck, N.Y. 11952
Mr. Bressler: The only thing I have to say about Corso is, on the
front page, the total does not reflect the total, you have to add the
land, all we indicated was the total. The total assessment is $9,800
not $8,100. Is that right Bob, $9,800 and the deduction was brought
down to $8,400.
Mr. Sullivan: You have the total of $8,191, what does that represent?
Mr. Bressler: That is a portion of the total, I think we broke that
out of the tax bill. It should be land, building, and total of
$9,800.
Mr. Sullivan: $8,191 represents the building?
Mr. Bressler: Is that roughly what it reflects Bob?
Mr. Scott: The building should be $9,200.
23 411
Mr. Bressler: We are saying based on R.A.R. , 3 . 37, $8,400 is the
appropriate assessment.
Mr. Sullivan: On the Residential Assessment Ratio of 3 . 37?
Mr. Scott: The only thing I have to say on that is there is no
indication as to the proof, I would claim the owner has a value of
$250,000 and we ask that you consider there was no proof, and that
the Assessors seem to be correct.
Mr. Sullivan: I didn' t get the last word.
Mr. Scott: There is no proof to the contrary that the value is the
value that they are saying it is.
Mr. Sullivan: O.K. Any other questions?
The afternoon session resumed at 1: 00 p.m. present were:
John Sullivan, Chairman
Thomas Burdy, Co-Chairman
William F. English Jr.
Francis A. Thorp
Robert H. Whelan
10) 1000-35-2-12
Floyd F. King
Island's End Golf & Country Club, Inc.
P.O. Box 2066
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Burdy: Do you solemnly swear that the information you give
herein will be given accurately and truthfully to the best of your
ability?
Mr. Markel: I do.
Mr. Campbell: I do.
Mr. Markel: After you hear my statement, you' ll understand. All of
these parcels are composites of Island' s End Golf & Country Club
Inc. The claim that we are making, the things that we are showing on
that plan is a like enterprise in a much similar situation of
composite of many properties, that is North Fork Country Club. I
have gotten through the Freedom of Information Act, the cards of the
North Fork Country Club, so I will submit them to you so you don' t
have to pay the $1. 00 to get them like I did.
Mr. Sullivan: I will declare my interest in this as a member and a
stockholder of Island' s End Golf Club, and excuse myself and sign the
statement at a later time.
Mr. Burdy: Lets continue.
111 24410
Mr. Markel: As you will note in the forms of the North Fork
Country Club, I have outlined the buildings and improvements that
have been made at North Fork, and just to give you an idea, one item
of the main building, was built at a cost of $900,000. I 'm sure
after you people get to the point where you can look at all this
stuff, you' ll know where I 'm coming from. The other point I 'd like
to make is that their rates are much greater then our golf place.
These are several lots and that's why we're doing it as a composite.
Naturally their tax bill is higher then our tax bill, but the
composite of the properties and the improvements against the ratio of
the composites, I think you will find in our favor. That' s the
statement I have. Now, one other statement we'd like to make, and
John's going to make, and I know this doesn't have an actual bearing
on the decision, but we'd like you people, especially the new Board
members to understand where we come from in this town, and Mr.
Campbell, who is our president now, will make that statement. Thank
you very much.
Mr. Campbell: I don't know if everybody is aware, but the Island' s
End Golf & Country Club is open to every resident in Southold town
who can pay the fee. It' s the only game in town for the residences.
We keep it as a recreational area, there is no housing on it or
dwellings, therefore we send no students to the school or anything
else. We do employ between 40 and 50 Southold town residents and
that is the reason for our grievance, we are not exclusive, anybody
can come out and play at Island' s End, I don' t think any other 18
hole golf course can say that in town, I can't go any place to play
unless I 'm the right type of quest. I think that is all I have to
say. We allow and encourage the Kiwanis Club, GOP, the Democratic
Party, any group that brings money for the benefit of their actions
in Southold town to rent our golf course and come out and play, and
we close it down for their benefit. We make benefit of course, but
many hours of benefit go to Southold town.
Mr. Burdy: Any questions? Is that all that you have to say?
Mr. Campbell: That's all we have to say.
Mr. Burdy: Do the Assessors have anything to say?
Mr. Scott: Yes, sir we do. First of all, the first influence by Mr.
Marcel, was that the North Fork Country Club built their main
building at a cost of $900,000 which just so happens if you take the
improvement portion to the North Fork Country Club, the new addition
was $39,151, if you use the E.R.E. , it presently is assessed at a
market value of 1.5 million dollars parcel that we are taking into
effect that particular type of thing. The other thing is that
granted the property is open, but so are restaurants, movie theatres
that employ people, and they don't come in asking for a rebate on
that bases because of the fact that they employ people and they felt
that it was open to the public at large. Again, they're saying it is
open for people and they provide a community service and I don' t deny
that, I think it' s a terrific group and I think they do a nice job,
such as the GOP, and the Democrat' s, and everything else, they have
25
golf outtings, but so does Porkie' s have functions at their place
and Soundview for the Historical Society and things like that and
they rent through the price of a meal as they rent through the price
of their greens fees and everything else. Again, they don't ask for
a reduction on that basis. In addition, the assessment on
1000-35-2-11, which is one of the parcels they're grieving on,
they're basing the assessment on the land as $10,000. The first
$1,000 is for where the club house is and that' s the improved portion
of it which is considerably more then we did even for a residential
piece of property which is $16,000. In addition to that, the
remainder portion of the property, which is 30 acres, is at $300 an
acre which is unfarmed farmland agricultural assessment. This is how
we are doing it. It' s the lowest assessment we could do for that
particular type property you can get anywhere. My other thing is
that they have no stipulation of proof of what they feel the value is
at by the reduction of the value of the assessment of which they are
speaking. That' s all I have to say unless somebody else would like
to say something.
Mr. Markel: In defense of what we said, we do not believe what
John said to you people. Our grounds for getting a reduction, in
fact, we just want to make you aware of the activities that we have
there and I personally am not going to argue with Mr. Scott on his
demerits or lack of merits, I ' ll leave that up to you people with the
facts being on the cards. If you can possibly make head or tail of
some of the figures I 've seen on these cards, why you're pretty good,
and that's all I have to say. Thank you very much for hearing me.
Mr. Russell: I just wanted to clarify for everyone' s benefit this is
neither an argument for or against the reduction, that the larger
picture to consider here is the assessed values of North Fork and
Island' s End. I think currently Island' s End has a total assessment
picture, of all the parcels, with about $56,200. North Fork has a
total assessment picture of in excess of $80,000. Currently that
would represent Island' s End being assessed at about 70% of the value
of North Fork, whether that is appropriate or not, I don't know,
that' s up to you, but I think that would clarify for everyone the
issue when you try to compare a lot of property cards, for two
separate entities. Unfortunately, as I say separate entities, but
there are three, four, or five cards that go with each of them, so
you want to look at the overall picture and then decide what the
appropriate value is at.
Mr. Markel: Thank you very much for your time.
Mr. Burdy: Do you have any questions?
Mr. Markel: I have no further questions?
Mr. Burdy: As you know Sam, you' ll be notified.
Paul Henry: As we discussed previously, one of my problems is that
for some reason people wait till the last two weeks. Out of the
26410
1, 200 or so Grievances that we are filing this year in Nassau and
Suffolk County, I would say 80% of the cases came to me in the last
two weeks, impossible to work up the cases before Grievance Day.
What I propose we do, as we did last year, would be that we in a
couple of weeks get together in a session and try to go over some of
these cases and save all of us the ordeal of going through the
appeals process. I have a lot of cases that I think we could
probably resolve together, and I would ask that I be granted a
special session to do such, at our leisure.
Mr. Sullivan: Just one second, I want to confer with the rest of the
Board members. They have reached a decision, that all Grievances
must be submitted by today.
Mr. Henry: Agreed, and so they have.
Mr. Sullivan: All Grievances have been submitted?
Mr. Henry: Yes sir, I 'm not proposing that I submit additional
papers here, I 'm proposing that we review the papers another day
together and perhaps it might save all of us a lot of trouble if the
Board agrees that I spend some time with the Assessors and go over
these papers because I think that it would make it a lot easier for
everybody if that were permissible.
Mr. Sullivan: All the cases you want to present are on file?
Mr. Henry: Yes, sir I will say under oath I 'm not planning to submit
any additional cases after today.
Mr. Sullivan: How many are there?
Mr. Henry: Sir, I have no count.
Mr. Sullivan: Are they all of those?
Mr. Henry: These are all the cases. It' s possible I might submit a
couple of more before the end of the day.
Mr. Sullivan: How many do you have?
Mr. Henry: I honestly don't have a count.
Mr. Sullivan: How many are there?
Mr. Henry: I don' t know, I don't count them, it' s bad luck.
Mr. Sullivan: Give us a count, would you please?
Mr. Russell: About 150.
Mr. Sullivan: Is there any back up to go with this?
27411
Mr. Henry: These are just my receipts, the Grievances have been
filed. There are some appraisals. My field staff is going to be out
in the field over the next seven days taking pictures and comps.
and working them up and I realize that Grievance Day is today, but
obviously we're poised to go through the appeals process if we have
to but we would like to avoid that for everybody's sake if that is
possible. We'd just like a chance to present this at a session, soon
to be, certainly I would propose the first week of June.
Mr. Sullivan: I think what we are going to have to deal with here
is, if there are complete Grievances files, that' s with all the
backup and all the other paper work that we need by today.
Mr. Henry: I have met the requirements in the office of filing the
Grievances. I have the completed forms. I don' t copy the whole form
for my records.
Mr. Sullivan: No, no, I understand that.
Mr. Henry: I am proposing that I submit to you additional
information that I have filed today with the cases. That is true and
if you don' t accept that, that' s fine, that's your prerogative.
Mr. Sullivan: No, we would like all information submitted by today,
because of our time frame.
Mr. Henry: O.K. , that' s your prerogative.
Mr. Sullivan: We have a deadline also. Do you know if all of the
Grievances are complete, there is 150 of them?
Mr. Scott: I can ask Claire if they are in.
Mr. Henry: Your Decision Day is the last day of June?
Mr. Sullivan: It' s as soon as we can get these hearings over with.
Mr. Henry: O.K. , I 'm just asking. I thought your process went to
the end of June.
Mr. Sullivan: The process can go to the end of June, and we must be
complete by July 1. With 150 of these, we're going to have to do it
next week.
Mr. Henry: Why don' t I put together what I can, and we' ll do what we
can do, if that would be permissible.
Mr. Sullivan: It' s got to be sometime next week.
Board: What happens to the balance of them if we don't get to them
next week, Henry?
Mr. Henry: Then they will have to be appealed.
• 28 •
•
Mr. Sullivan: Mr. Henry, you have submitted all of the supporting
documents for each one of these sheets here, is that correct?
Mr. Henry: No, I 'm specifically requesting to submit additional
information that I don't have today, which is certainly in the
boundaries of the Grievance Board requesting information or receiving
it, and it does not mean they have to open up the process for
additional Grievances. It would just be an information session.
Mr. Sullivan: That may be that you don' t have all the information,
but the typical four page application.
Mr. Henry: Have all been completed and filed.
Mr. Sullivan: Have all been completed, signed, and filed?
Mr. Henry: Correct. We don't have time to work up these papers when
the people come to us over the short notice.
Mr. Sullivan: Mr. Henry, that is not our problem. Our problem is
getting these in by Grievance Day.
Mr. Henry: Sir, all my grievances are filed, I'm trying to suggest
that we might be able to through a lot of these papers and resolve
them equitably on whatever we can agree. I'm not suggesting anything
else, you don' t even have to give me an answer today.
Mr. Sullivan: We will review Mr. Henry's grievances next Tuesday,
May 21,1993 at 9:00a.m. in the conference room.
11) 1001-5-3-16.1
FUR & GAMES, INC.
P.O. Box 119, 132 Main St.
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: FUR & GAMES, currently assessed at $11,700, asking to
be reduced to $4,980. This is an improved piece of property, the
land value is $2,300 and the improvements are $9,400, making it
$11,700 for the total assessed valuation. The applicant is asking it
to be reduced down to $4,980, approximately 60%. Comments from the
Assessors?
Mr. Scott: The only comment being that there is absolutely no proof
submitted.
Mr. Sullivan: Any questions?
12) 1000-43-4-37
Mr. & Mrs. Dominick Sblendido
6 Clark Street
Huntington, New York 11743
411 29411
Mr. Sullivan: This property is assessed at $9,400.
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman, last year there was a reduction by the
Grievance Board because there was not a C.O. issued. This year there
was a C.O. issued. It was a completed house and the Assessors came
in, and on that basis, removed all the for completion and everything
else and put this down as a finished assessment. That's the reason
why there is an increase over last year, that is why there was a
review, because there was no C.O. , I think that is why the Board of
Assessment Review, reduced the assessment last year.
Mr. Sullivan: The Grievance Board reduced it from $5,700 to $4,100,
is that right?
Mr. Scott: Yes sir, based on the fact that they couldn't use it
because there was problems with the Planning Board. . .
Mr. Sullivan: Then $4,100 was the full assessment?
Mr. Scott: No, it' s only as an incomplete house. Now that they have
received a C.O. , it's a finished house, the assessment goes up to
where it should have been when it is completed. We have been
assessing on the basis of completion, as you can see through the
assessment on the other side. They have gone from $5,600 to $4,100,
then it was at $5,700 for an added deck that year. When it was
reduced to $4,100 again by the appealing to the Board of Assessment
Review, because they couldn' t use it, they didn't, they did receive a
C.O. this year, so that wipes out any ability of that approach.
Mr. Sullivan: I hear what you are saying, but my point is this, what
was the $4,100 that you assessed?
Mr. Scott: You assessed sir, that was the assessment that you put on
it because of the Board of Assessment Review.
Mr. Sullivan: O.K. , then this is apart from the $4,600. I see it up
here. Any Questions?
13) 1000-34-4-19. 1
Antoinette & Wm. Pollert
P.O. Box 578
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Mr. Sullivan: This one doesn' t have a property card.
Mr. Russell: The girls haven't been able to locate it, we will
furnish it as soon as they can find it.
Mr. Sullivan: What is is assessed at now?
Mr. Russell: Total assessment is $6,100.
• 30 •
•, 1
Mr. Sullivan: Is this the southwestern corner of Mandamuses Ave. and
the Main Road?
Mr. Russell: I 'm going to make you a copy of that map right now.
Mr. Sullivan: The Board has Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, and Monday
to review all of Mr. Henry' s cases.
Mr. Scott: If he produces new evidence, we as the Assessors, have by
law, three days to review all information.
Mr. Whelan: Is there ever a cut off date?
Mr. Sullivan: It could be considered today.
Mr. Scott: I was just going to ask Mr. Henry if he would deny any of
the ones that do not have proof, as far as we are concerned, what
would then happen is he would appeal. On that basis there would be a
prehearing conference which is exactly what we are going to be doing
with him either three days from now or Tuesday, and at that time he
would have the evidence available for the Assessors to make a
qualified judgement, or before the appeals process.
Mr. Thorp: He could also do nothing for two weeks and still make an
appeal.
Mr. Henry: Basically, what Bob said is very accurate and from my
perspective, these are cases that I have that eventually I need to
work up and present to the Assessors. The question is when I will do
that.
14) 1000-123-10-1
Patricia Gazouleas
960 Willis Creek Drive
Mattituck, N.Y. 11952
Mr. Sullivan: Application was submitted but applicant did not appear.
Currently assessed at $19, 500 and would like it reduced to?
15) 1000-145-4-14. 1
Bertram W. & Margery M. Walker
P.O. Box 1169
Mattituck, N.Y. 11952
Mr. Sullivan: Application was submitted but applicant did not
appear. Assessed at $9,600 and would like it reduced to $8,500.
16) 1000-33-4-83
Jerry Colaitis
77 Woodedge Road
Plandome, N.Y. 11030
• 31 •
Mr. Sullivan: He' s got an appraisal from Andy Stype.
Mr. Scott: The property on his estimate and current market value is
$100,000. The appraisal that came in yesterday came in at $135,000
which goes contrary to what the owner is saying. We don' t
necessarily agree with the appraisal which we just received yesterday
because they are comparing things on Sixth Street in Greenport and
also Broad Street in Greenport. We' re got an estimated value of
$179,000. The appraisal date was as of yesterday and it should have
been as of the first of January because that' s the evaluation date.
His opinion of pro-market value is contrary to his appraisal which is
not the proper appraisal base, so there are several things which we
disagree with and we ask that you go with what the Assessors had
before.
Mr. Sullivan: $100,000, and you say what?
Mr. Scott: Right on his appraisal that he received from Andy
Stype, and the date of the appraised value right above it is
$135,000 as of yesterday. Even his cost approach, $143,000 which is
much more in keeping with the value of the property. This is a one
family residential and the E.R. is not the proper rate we feel should
be used, it should be the Residential Assessment Ratio which 3 .24
Mr. Sullivan: I though you said the book gave then the benefit of
the doubt?
Mr. Scott: No, sir.
Mr. Sullivan: Yes, yes, yes.
Mr. Scott: According to the latest training that we had, they
specifically tell you that the one, two, and three family houses are
best suited to be rated by the R.A.R. or a rate deemed by the
Assessors to be the most appropriate, which we substantiated with a
letter to you, from the Dept. of Equalization and Assessment today,
3 . 24. All other property such as commercial or vacant land or
something along that line should be used by the Equalization Rates.
Mr. Sullivan: I don' t know, I guess I ' ll have to look it up in the
book, I though it said you gave then the benefit of the doubt, which
is more advantageous to the griever. That' s what I 'm saying is in
the book.
Mr. Scott: What is says in the book, we feel sir, is they can ask to
use anyone that may be advantageous to them, but it' s up to the Board
of Assessment Review to use the ones that are most advantageous to
the town, not to the griever. The most appropriate rate to use for a
one, two, and three family house is a Residential Assessment Ratio,
not an Equalization Rate.
Mr. Sullivan: I hear what you' re saying, I just have to look it up
in the book again and our Training Manual for the Board of Assessment
•
• 32 •
Review. Somebody that publishes the book in training, ought to get
together. What do you do with vacant land?
Mr. Scott: Vacant land, the Equalization Rate, which is the most
appropriate rate for that one sir.
Mr. Sullivan: Next one Tom.
17) 1000-143-5-11
Joseph & Eleanore Friedman
590 Riley Avenue
Mattituck, N.Y. 11952
Mr. Sullivan: Eleanore & Joseph Friedman.
Mr. Russell: Mr. Friedman had come in and talked to me about his
assessment. We had re-assessed his property because he had
constructed a second floor addition. By his own estimates, he had
built a new house down there. We put a value on it that we thought
was adequate. It's a waterfront piece of property and our indicated
value is $185,000. He paid $170,000 for it last year before he built
the new house. By his Building Permit, the estimated cost was
$50,000. We had looked at the neighborhood, because he felt he was
unequally assessed, the one big problem with that is that his
neighbors have older homes. Older, smaller homes, a lot of them
don' t have heat. On a basis of unequal assessment, I think he would
have to establish the value of his neighbors homes, and that they
were being assessed at a lower percentage of that value then he is,
not that their assessments are different. Assessments can be
different for a variety of reasons, poor construction, older
houses,smaller houses, land that' s not as viable.
Mr. Sullivan: How much did he pay on that?
Mr. Russell: He paid $170,000 last year, and then built a house, he
estimates costs him $50,000. My personal opinion is that it was at
least $100,000 to build.
Mr. Sullivan: Any questions?
18 ) 1000-106-5-4
Vasilios Lambiris
c/o Vanessa A. Ploumis Esq.
64 East 34th Street
New York, N.Y. 10016
Mr. Sullivan: Number 18, Lambiris
Mr. Russell: We had reviewed the property at the owners request, to
check the accuracy of our assessment. We thought that we made due
diligence in working with them and we feel he fails to meet his
burden of proof for the value he is stating.
33
•
Mr. Sullivan: Any questions.
19) 1000-106-10-28. 5
Mahir & Greta Zara
P.O. Box 910
Mattituck, N.Y. 11952
Mr. Sullivan: They've had the house on the market for $290,000.
Mr. Scott: Using the same ratio that they used, it would be $7,970.
Mr. Russell: If I can just interject, I don't see them asking that
anywhere on this application. They have their value established, but
they don' t mention an assessed value that they are requesting. They
say they submitted a letter of appraisal, but Mr. DeReeder is not a
licensed appraiser by the state of New York. It' s a letter of
opinion, there is no appraisal that has been preformed. I would also
like to point out that Mr. DeReeder' s letter of opinion of $246,000
is contradicted by other supporting documentation that was on the
letterhead of Mr. Wiggins, Jonathan Wiggins Reality, who in fact
made an offer to the owner for $270,000, which was rejected by
owner. Therefore, we can assume the market value, is at least an
excess of $250,000 that would contradict the $246,000. Again, this
is not anappraisal, it' s a letter of opinion from an unqualified
source.
20) 1000-88-4-24
Joseph & Susan Macchia
340 Bay Haven Lane
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Mr. Burdy: Will you raise your right hand please? Do you solemnly
swear that the information you give herein will be given accurately
and truthfully to the best of your ability?
Mr. & Mrs. Macchia: I do.
Mrs. Macchia: I came here because of the assessed value of $6 ,600
and I guess because of the deck we had built and when they did the
appraisal, they found the air-conditioning. I don't understand why
it went up, because of the air-conditioning, it was built with that
from the very beginning and I also believe that, I don't have my
appraisal, I 'd like to know if I can submit that after the fact also,
that I believe the appraisal before we bought the house was $160,000
or $165,000 I think, and this is quite high I think.
Mr. Sullivan: Where do you have your appraisal?
Mrs. Macchia: I don' t have it with me, I have to call the bank and
see if I can get it. I would like to submit that after the fact. I
think it should be a lot lower, maybe $5,900. My mortgage is lower,
we did buy it for $173 ,000.
i 34 •
Mr. Sullivan: Does anyone have any comments on this?
Mr. Russell: One of the Assessors went to review the property based
on the Building Permit that was issued August 5, 1992 for the
construction of a deck addition. We went, we measured the deck, we
assessed the deck accordingly, 25 cents a square foot, also we saw
that there was a central air-conditioning unit on the the premises
that' s assessable property. We had to assess for it. I know they
had come and talked to me after that, and said well the assessable
air-conditioning unit had been on the property since 1978. That
might be true, unfortunately it was just discovered now. That' s
assessable property, we honestly don' t relish going out and finding
all this property, but once we see it, of course we were there for a
deck, we have no choice but to assess it, like we do with all the
other central air-conditioning units in town.
Mr. Sullivan: So this increase is based on the air-conditioner and
the deck? The house is fully air-conditioned?
Mrs. Macchia: It always has been since the day it was built.
Mr. Sullivan: Thank you very much, you' ll be hearing from us as soon
as possible.
21) 1000-33-1-10
Mr. & Mrs. Richard Kopek
2800 Sound Drive
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Burdy: Do you solemnly swear that the information you give
herein will be given accurately and truthfully to the best of your
ability?
Mrs. Kopek: Yes, I do.
Mr. Burdy: Thank you.
Mrs. Kopek: Well, obviously I 'm here because I think I 'm rather
highly assessed and I would like it to be placed at a more equal
feeling with my neighbors. I don't know what else to say, I just
think it' s really excessively high.
Mr. Sullivan: Do I read this right, it' s .92 acres?
Mr. Scott: Yes sir, Mr. Chairman, the $14,000 divided by the
Residential Assessment Ratio, shows an indicated value of
approximately $441,000. This is for 150 feet of Sound waterfront.
It' s also with a building that has approximately 3,448 square feet.
The comps. that Mrs. Kopek is using at this point, are two
non-waterfront parcels of property within Eastern Shores Estates
section which is in, it' s like comparing apples and oranges, it's not
waterfront and waterfront. Sound waterfront is Sound waterfront.
Sound waterfront retains it' s value as opposed to the inner lots. We
. 35
feel that the assessment is within the scope of what it should be, as
evidence by sales again, such as the one on Soundview Ave.
Extension, which is a smaller building with 8/10 of an acre, with
only 100 feet of waterfront, and that sold for $530,000 as of 2/92.
So we feel the assessment of $14,300, without a more extensive
delineation of value, should stand.
Mrs. Kopek: There are several houses on the Sound that are for
sale and have been for sale for quite sometime, and obviously there
are no potential buyers for them because these people are not not
able to sell their homes.
Mr. Sullivan: What are they asking for these homes?
Mrs. Kopek: I really don' t know. I haven' t contacted them. One
just two houses down from me on the south side, has been on the
market for approximately five years.
Mr. Sullivan: Five years, and that' s down the street from you?
Mrs. Kopek: Yes, to the east of me.
Mr. Scott: As a former Real Estate Broker, there were several people
that had property on the market for several years that really did not
want to sell it because they priced it out of the market. The only
indication of fair market value is a fair market sale, ready,
willing, and able, arms length. I 'm afraid that the only thing we
can accept are sales, we can not ask for something that is on the
market and has not sold.
Mr. Sullivan: That' s why I asked the question.
Mrs. Kopek: I realize I 'm paying a premium for where we' re living,
but we've worked very hard to purchase this and maintain it. We are
working equally as hard. With so many places off the tax rolls, with
condos getting abatements, my taxes go higher and so do other people
because we are subsidizing many of these other parcels, and that in a
way is unfair also. At one of the recent Board meetings I attended,
someone made a comment which was, have you agreed to our school
district? And it was said that no one should be paying more then
$5,000 in school taxes and I do believe my taxes are considerable
higher then $5,000 for the school tax. I have a copy of my last bill.
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman, a comment like that and the Board meeting
has no validity here because that' s a blanket statement and shouldn' t
be taken as scripture for one. Number two, for the property owner to
make an estimate of current value of $331,018.52 is a very exact
appraisal of what the value of the property is, and as a former
appraiser and real estate broker, it' s very tough to come that
close. I submit that the amount of proof that she has submitted to
this grievance application is not sufficient to warrant a decision at
this particular time.
• 36•
•
Mr. Thorp: Mrs. Kopek, I just have one question. The assessed
valuation of this property has been the same since 1985, eight years
ago according to the assessment card, is there any reason why you are
coming in now and you haven't come in in the past?
Mrs. Kopek: In 1985 I wasn' t paying close to $9,000.
Board: I realize that in 1985, but what about 1991, or 1992.
Mrs. Kopek: We were able to scrape and live with it, and now it
has become excessive.
22) 1000-103-14-2
Paul & Jane Kendarich
3600 Pequash Avenue
Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935
Mr. Burdy: Mr. Kendarich, do you solemnly swear that the
information you give herein will be given accurately and truthfully
to the best of your ability:
Mr. Kendarich: I do.
Mr. Sullivan: Mr. Kendarich, do you have any comments?
Mr. Kendarich: Yes, we've been at this for three years now. Last
year we hired that guy, what' s his name, to do this for us and he got
it down some, but in comparing the property where we live, I can't
talk, I just had dental work done. Comparing the properties where we
live, we bought the house for $180,000 at the top of the market.
Since then, the prices have dropped around us, in the whole town
really, and I figure a fair price is $185,000-$180,000, something
like that. They had us at $260,000 and now they' re down to
$205,000. I think $185,000 is a fair price, the taxes have just
sky-rocketed on us and it' s just a little ranch. They had us as a
full basement for years, and we didn' t know that. We have a half
basement, so they reduced part of it on that. I don't know what else
to say, we've seen houses twice the size of ours and the same taxes
as we are.
Mr. Sullivan: Do you have any comparable in your area?
Mr. Kendarich: The house right next door to us sold for $140,000
last year, it' s a little smaller but it' s the same ranch. We had an
above ground pool, we took that out. The only thing we have done is
to make a half bath into a full bath, that' s it.
Mr. Sullivan: Southold is a large area.
Mr. Kendarich: Yes, it was on the south side, towards the bay.
Mr. Sullivan: Just like Fleet' s Neck is towards the bay.
• 37 •
Mr. Kendarich: Yes, Fleet' s Neck is nearer.
Mr. Sullivan: Aren' t you on Fleet' s Neck?
Mr. Kendarich: No, Pequash Ave. All we want is fairness, that' s
all.
Mr. Sullivan: We realize that. Is Goose Neck road the same?
Mrs. Duffy: Yes, I think it is.
Mr. Sullivan: So you are located on Fleet' s Neck?
Mr. Kendarich: Yes, four or five blocks up from the water and it' s
only a small piece of property, 100 by 150, no garage, nothing fancy.
Mr. Sullivan: Do the Assessors have any comments on this?
Mr. Russell: Yes, we would just like to point out, as Mr.
Kendarich said, he had filed through Tax Reduction Services last
year, went to Small Claims and got a reduction for the 1993 year that
brought the assessment from $8,000 down to $6,740. We haven' t
touched the assessment, we have let the decision stand. Also, I
would want to point out that the issue with the no basement over a
portion of the house, when Mr. Kendarich brought it to our
attention, we not only removed it, but we gave him an additional
amount of money off for the amount of money we calculated that he had
been over paying since he took ownership in 1988. To this day, we
are still subtracting that amount of money from the overall value to
hopefully make up to Mr. Kendarich what mistakes or correction or
any errors that we might have been unfair. We'd ask you also to look
at the opinion of value, which is exactly what it is, that I have
just given you copies of. It' s opinion of value, it' s not a genuine
appraisal.
Mr. Sullivan: Is there any value to an above ground swimming pool in
an assessment?
Mr. Russell: No, we're not adding anything. Above ground pools are
assessable property but we are not assessing any on this property.
It was never on the card. We just feel at this point that $6,740 is
pretty reflective, and a competitive assessment for that overall
neighborhood down there. We would like to extend to Mr. Kendarich
the knowledge that we certainly are happy with that reduction form
Small Claims, we have no interest in re-assessing it in the future.
Mr. Kendarich: Mr. Scott' s been very helpful, but the true market
value is $185,000.
Mr. Burdy: How do you arrive at that price?
Mr. Kendarich: From different real estates we've gone around to
comparable properties in the town and priced them.
411 38 •
Mr. Scott: As a point of information, the Small Claims Court just
reduced his assessed valuation to $6,740 as of last month.
Mr. Russell: It' s a retro-active situation, to the 1992-1993 year
which he will be getting a refund for that.
Board: That took place a year ago.
Mr. Scott: So Mr. Kendarich' s taxes, for all intent purposes, were
reduced a year ago.
Board: Do you have a number on how much additional he is under
assessed because of this pay back you explained?
Mr. Russell: We had removed, basements don't add that much to the
assessed value of the property if you look at it. We removed $203 of
assessed value, for 812 square foot, which is only 25 cents a square
foot. We made a mistake and we had to correct it and we will carry
it on until we feel, or Mr. Kendarich feels, we have corrected it.
Mr. Sullivan: Any further questions from anyone? Thank you Mr.
Kendarich, you will be hearing from us as soon as possible.
23) 1000-106-8-50.7
Daniel V. Brisotti
1110 Sunset Drive
Mattituck, N.Y. 11952
Mr. Burdy: Would you raise your right hand please? Do you
solemnly swear that the information you give herein will be given
accurately and truthfully to the best of your ability?
Mr. Brisotti: I do.
Mr. Burdy: Thank you.
Mr. Brisotti: You have my letter there, but the main point, I have
a fairly large house in an area where all the other houses are very
small. It' s approximately seven acres of non-subdividable property,
it' s in the deed. In the past, while my assessed value is currently
$17,000, it was reduced from $18,1000 down to $17,000 and as you can
see based on the R.A.R. of 3 . 37, I don't know whether that is the
current one as of now, it shows a market value somewhere in excess of
a half a million dollars, which is for a house basically adjacent to
Captain Kid Estates, Mattituck, non-water front property, seems
rather excessive. I 've attempted to get an appraisal, which I have
been unable to get in the last two weeks. What I 've done is my own
checking of the various title transfers and what I 've come up with is
basically that there is, in the last year, there was nothing that I
could find over $300,000 that sold away from the water. If you
exclude North Fork Country Club area, I couldn't find anything over a
quarter of a million dollars. That's basically the bases for my
being here tonight, to bring it down. There' s another point, I met
39411
with Mr. Scott six months ago here, I don't remember the exact date.
I did not realize at that point, the meeting with him, he went over
the file with me and he agreed to look into a possible reduction, I
was not aware at that time that would in any way impact something
like this, nor did I even realize that the assessed valuation had any
relationship to the market value. That' s something I 've really only
become aware of in the last month, and that' s why I 'm here.
Mr. Sullivan: Mr. Brisotti, your application doesn' t request a new
assessment, which is an incomplete application as far as I 'm
concerned. You show an assessed evaluation of $17,000 but you're not
asking the Board to reduce it to X. That' s your decision, not our
decision.
Mr. Brisotti: I was basing it strictly on market value which would
bring it down to approximately $8,350, is what I would be
requesting. I have to admit, I was filling that out sitting on the
couch outside there.
Mr. Scott: We did want you to take into consideration that this
house is located on 7. 57 acres of property. There are not too many
lots of that size on the North Fork. It is a house that is 3,692
square feet with 540 feet of finished basement as well. It' s a
considerable house. We feel that the $250,000 that is the owners
estimate of current is an opinion of value, and it' s not something
more complete then that.
Mr. Brisotti: The only point, I believe it' s 7.03 something
acres. The other point though is that it' s deeded in there that it' s
not subdividable. There' s really not much difference between a two
acre parcel and a seven acre parcel as far as value is concerned.
Given by the fact that there are three other parcels adjacent to it,
all three they cannot sell. In one case an individual has, after
trying to sell it for about four years, is going to put up a house.
Mr. Sullivan: Which property is that Mr. Brisotti?
Mr. Brisotti: The property adjacent to me is owned by Ceola.
Mr. Sullivan: That' s a land locked piece of property.
Mr. Brisotti: They have a deeded right of way across my property.
Of the four parcels, two of them are land locked and two of them are
not.
Mr. Sullivan: The piece that' s adjacent to you is adjacent to that
piece has frontage on Dogwood Lane.
Mr. Brisotti: O.K. , then there must be a right of way across that
to get to the fourth parcel.
Mr. Thorp: The piece that' s adjacent to the one across from Dogwood,
is a nine acre site that runs 400 feet on Moose' s Road.
40411
Mr. Sullivan: Mr. Brisotti, thank you very much, we' ll let you
know as soon as possible.
24) 1000-2-6-52.1
David S. Corwin
639 Main Street
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Burdy: Mr. Corwin, do you solemnly swear that the
information you give herein will be given accurately and truthfully
to the best of your ability?
Mr. Corwin: I do. I 've made some copies of my application, I ' ll
hand out if you would like to see them.
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman, in the interest of brevity, the Assessors
are willing to accept $130,000 in both cases. In the case of
1001-2-6-52.1 and 1001-2-6-41.1 on the bases of the appraisals shown,
but we deny the use of the E.R. and say the R.A.R. of 3.24 should be
the one that should be applied, and the assessment would then be
$4, 212. That' s our stipulation. In one case it goes from $5,000 to
$4,212.
Mr. Thorp: Is that lot 52. 1?
Mr. Sullivan: Lot 52. 1 we are saying $130,000, we are agreeing to
the value but it should be based on the R.R.R. which is 3 . 24, the
adjusted one. In that case it would be $130,000 times .0324 which
would be $4,212, so that takes that assessment from $6,000 to $4,212,
a reduction of $1,788.
Mr. Sullivan: What was the other one?
Mr. Scott: The other one was tax map 1001-2-6-41. 1. Essentially the
same comparable was used and approximately the same amount of square
footage in each subject case, we still stipulate the use of the
R.A.R. for one, two, and three family homes, $4,212 would be the
resulting assessment.
Mr. Sullivan: Do we have anymore from Mr. Corwin?
Mr. Corwin: Yes, one more. I just want to say that the E.R. from
my immediate understanding of the process here, is a more accurate
figure. It' s a figure that the state does a lot more work on from my
understanding and my reading through the brochure I got from the
Assessors. The R.A.R. is not required, so I would assume if I come
in and say well I want the R.A.R. because it' s lower, you guys would
say well no, we' ll use the E.R. rate. So I 'm saying the R.A.R. is
higher, I want to use the E.R. rate.
Mr. Sullivan: Let me ask you this, where did you read this?
410 41 •
Mr. Corwin: I don't have that sheet with me, but it's a hand out
that came from the Assessors office and one of the lines says, the
Board of Assessment Review does not require the use of the R.A.R. I
could send you a copy of that tomorrow.
Mr. Sullivan: Assessors?
Mr. Russell: The difference between the E.R. and R.A.R. is that of
course E.R. includes all properties in the town, R.A.R. is specific
to residential property.
25) 1001-2-6-41.1
David S. Corwin
639 Main Street
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Discussed with #24.
26) 1000-44-1-16
David S. Corwin
639 Main Street
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Corwin: Lot 16, which is on County Road 48, again I have
copies if anyone would like to follow along on the map. This piece
of property is a waterfront piece of property on the Sound. If you
are riding on County Road 48, it' s one of the few places you can see
the Sound from the road. It' s not really a developed piece of
property, it has a little storage shack on the piece of property. I
looked around to try to find some comparable parcels to this, and I
could not find any in terms of recent sales. Because this is a
unique piece of property, it has an old building on it that' s going
to go any day in a storm one of these days. Now, what the Assessors
have done, they have a formula for that piece of property and they've
applied that to every piece of property in that little cove or area
if you will, which I guess they figure is $13 .74 a foot, and I would
have no problem with that assessment at all, if I could build a house
there tomorrow, but I think you all know I can' t do that, because I
would have to go to at least five different Boards and get a variance
before I could build on this piece of property. So what I did, was
try to come up with some kind of value for the property. I figured
purchase price of a Sound front lot, to subdivided lot, pay the
Building Inspector $250 fee, you can build on it tomorrow. Then if
there is an adjustment in there because it is a very small lot,
$50,000. I put an adjustment on there because it is right on County
Road 48 so if you build a house there, you would open your front door
and step out into the traffic. So I took the purchase price of a
buildable lot at $200,000 with the adjustment for lot size at
$50,000, and the adjustment for County Road 48 at approximately
$48,000 to $50,000 and the lot 16 is worth $100,000 if I could build
on it tomorrow, but again I can' t build on it tomorrow and you all
know that. I put some costs together, and you may not agree with my
411 42411
costs but seem to agree with my preface that I can' t build on the lot
tomorrow, so it' s not worth as much money as the lot on either side
that have houses. So what I did is I put a price on a variance that
I would have to get to meet regulatory agencies. First I would have
to go to Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services, for a variance to
construct cesspools, within proper lot area and proper waterfront
step back. I figure that' s worth $5,000. Then I would have to go to
New York State Dept. Environmental Conservation, and I would have
to get a variance for wetlands, and I would have to get a coastal
erosion hazard area variance, I figure another $5,000 for that. Then
I would have to go to Southold Town Trustees Wetlands for another
variance. I figure another $5,000. Then I would have to go here to
the Zoning Board of Appeals for a variance for and I
figure another $5,000. Then I figure someplace along the way, I 'm
going to have to niche an article 78 proceeding because somebody is
going to say, we' re not going to give you a variance, so I 'm going to
have to get an attorney, to to Supreme Court, I figure that' s worth
$20,000. I have to bring in fill, that's $5,000. I 'd have to build
a piled foundation, that's $20,000. That would get me to the point
where I could build a structure on there, if I bought a lot for
$200,000. So I figure the cost to develop the property is $85,000,
so estimating the value of the lot is $15,000. Now I spoke to the
Assessor about this lot, six months to a year ago, and his argument
is, well look there is vacant land across the street, they' re gonna
come along and they're gonia buy it from you, and it' s gonna be
worth more then that. Well that' s assuming that I want to sell the
property. It' s been in my family for many years. It belongs to
myself and my cousins. It' s been used as a bathing beach and this
point and time it' s getting very little use because it' s been
subjected to severe erosion. I don' t know if you can see from the
photographs how high the tide comes up on that piece of property, but
another hurricane, it' ll be up to the county road. I don' t think
this assessment, which is based on the idea that it' s a billable lot,
is a fair assessment. I think the assessment should be reduced to
the idea that it is not developable until I go through this $85,000
worth of work. I wish I could have some comparables to come in here
and say this is what it is worth, I did not get an appraisal. I
don't know how an appraiser would approach that, I think it would be
$350 for an appraiser to come up with a figure. That' s my case for
this piece of property.
Mr. Scott: Sir, the assessment on the property is 87 feet at $13 .74.
I just grabbed basically 23 different parcels that are adjacent on
both sides and they go from $14 a front foot to $34, $34, $35, $35,
$35, $35, $34, $28, $27, $27, $25, $22, $22, $22, $22, $25, $26, a
front foot. As I think what we are saying when we say $13 .74, that
we are taking into account the potential of his not being able to
build readily. It is true that possibly adjacent across the street
owners would like to purchase the piece of property, for bathing
purposes, as I mentioned to Dave in the past, there is a couple of
large lots of 55 and 74.9 acres across the street, that if they had
access to the water, would make those lots, if they were subdividing,
much more accessible and much more saleable, and more valuable. The
amount that we're putting on at $13,00 is the value of $52,208 which
4 43 5
is a realistic figure and one that is not subject to a great deal of
interpretation. That's what Mr. Corwin put here in his adjustments
which are speculations on his portion. I think that we have
reflected a fair appraisal by putting it at $13 .74 as compared to $22
which is the lowest of all his neighbors. I think we're reflective
of the type of use it' s being put to and I submit that I think that
it should not be changed. I think that we are reasonable, we have
changed two out of three of them in the past, if there is a reason
for change, we are acceptable to that.
Mr. Sullivan: Mr. Corwin, do you have any questions?
Mr. Corwin: No, my questions have already been answered.
Mr. Burdy: How long have you owned the property?
Mr. Corwin: It' s been a long time. Just a couple more comments if
I may. Mr. Scott says it' s speculation on my part these numbers that
I put together in the supporting documents, it' s speculation on his
part that the property across the street would want to buy that spot
to have beach front access, so I don' t accept that argument. What I
did to come up with the $13.75, was I measured on the map the pieces
of property that were adjacent to mine, and I used their assessed
valuation for land, and my figures came out to the same thing that my
property was. I 'm questioning where Mr. Scott is getting his numbers
from. It' s possible I made a mistake in that but, I did to through
the numbers assessing adjacent property.
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman, I 'd be happy to show Mr. Corwin the
numbers that are on all of the cards that have not been changed for
several years and I 'd be willing to show him anytime at his pleasure.
Mr. Sullivan: Anything else Mr. Corwin?
Mr. Corwin: No, thank you very much.
27) 1000-115-14-12
Mathew G. & Laurie Daly
P.O. Box 762
Mattituck, N.Y. 11952
Mr. Burdy: Please raise your right hand. Do you solemnly swear
that the information you give herein will be given accurately and
truthfully to the best of your ability?
Mr. Daly: I do.
Mr. Russell: Gentlemen, may I address the Board? Mr. Daly just
purchased the house, I personally think he got a great deal, but it
is an arms length sale, there is no argument from the Assessors that
that' s the represented value of the property.
Mr. Sullivan: You what?
• 44
It' s an arms length sale and we agree with the assessed value, there
is no way of getting around that.
Mr. Sullivan: From $7,800 to $4,600, is that right Mr. Russell?
Mr. Russell: Yes, we are saying we can not put up an argument in
this case, whatever he submitted to you is fine.
Mr. Sullivan: O.K.
Mr. Daly: We had purchased the home in December 1992 at $142,500
and I believe the assessed value is at $231,450.
Mr. Sullivan: Any questions?
28) 1000-44-2-17
Onnik & Araksi Arslanyan
58525 County Road 48
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Burdy: Do you solemnly swear that the information you give
herein will be given accurately and truthfully to the best of your
ability?
Mr. Arslanyan: I do.
Mr. Burdy: Thank you.
Mr. Arslanyan: I applied for a tax reduction when I became 65, and
they accepted and I paid reduction these taxes. When I received that
paper and I came to this gentleman, I said why are you denying, and
he said this is not your primary house. I have two houses, in Queens
25 years ago my mother-in-law and father-in-law were boarded to us,
to stay with us till they die. My father-in-law passed away, my
mother-in-law still with me. My mother bought this house, Greenport
house 16 years ago for us and we enjoying this house until then.
When I was younger, I was doing O.K. , I can take care of all of the
expenses, but now I became 65, 66 I have a social security of six
thousand some which I give you more information, and after I 'm trying
to make money for a living, so I could make another $5,000 or
$6,000. So when I get this, and I 'm surprised why they denied my
continuation of the tax deduction which I need that badly because I 'm
not making money and I have so many units, and my wife is ill from
the heart. I send her to my daughter, she lives with my
son-in-law,----stay with her because of the heart problem which I
give them the doctor' s name and I write it, and I said why I don't
get this reduction because myself I like to live Greenport till I
die. That' s my willing and I believe I have that right to do. I
choose this house, in my house, Greenport house, to live there. Nine
to ten months I live there and two months I go to my daughter' s again
in Fort Lauderdale, to join my wife but I make my wife come because
weather is better except winter, so I 'm requesting you to recognize,
• 45 •
to give me my rights and I continue to live in Greenport until I
cannot.
Mr. Burdy: Would you like to say something about that Mr. Russell?
Mr. Russell: Yes, Mr. Arsanylan owns a house in Forest Hills. He
submitted his application for exemption this year, every piece of
information, every bank statement, every C.D. statement, his Social
Security statement, has listed as his address Forest Hills. He had a
license registered to Forest Hills, he had everything registered to
Forest Hills. With the Assessors on the other hand, at the same
time, tries to see it in Mr. Arslanyan' s way, every opportunity we
had to talk to him, required us to dial a 718 number because Mr.
Arsanylan is never here, he is in Forest Hills. He comes out
weekends. It's a weekend residence and I respect that and I hope he
enjoys it, but a weekend residence doesn't qualify for senior
citizens exemption, they have to be a primary resident of this town.
I told Mr. Arslanyan how he could go about establishing his primary
residence status here, with the re-registration of the drivers
license, Board of Elections, things like that. He brought in two so
far that he has changed, but he made those changes within the last
couple of weeks. He has to be a primary residence of this community
for two years running to qualify for the senior exemption. Again, I
don't enjoy cancelling seniors exemptions, we have no choice, we
honestly don't.
Mr. Arsanylan: May I say something sir? This gentleman, with all
respect, he asked me, I don' t know the law what to do, and I asked
him to please tell me what to do. About two months ago, I come here
to find out, I did not know of this notice, he did not send to me,
and I asked this gentleman and he said nothing is registered to this
address and your Board of Election does not register, I said sir I
did not know, so I did right away, and I give to them all the copies,
and I said this is it sir, please help me, and after that still I get
the letter of denial, and I got of course upset about this and I
don't know what to do. Yesterday, I asked him again please help me,
if anything I need to prove to give it to him, before that, before
previous exemption I asked, he said give me some other papers which I
don' t remember now, and they accept it. But this time I need that
desperately or else I will have to sell the house. No one told me,
or I would have brought the papers two years ago.
Mr. Russell: The end of February, when this application came before
us, we wanted to enroll the seniors that were applying by March 1,
which is the deadline for application, I had called Mr. Arslanyan
in Forest Hills because I had a lot of questions about his
application. Again everything was registered to Forest Hills, not
just the tax bill, S.S. #, all these pieces of information. I had
asked him, he had told me that he only lived there once in a while,
that the only house he owns is in Greenport. I had asked him then if
you could then please supply me as quickly as possible a copy of the
deed for the Forest Hills house because he said it wasn't his, it was
his mother-in-laws, and a copy of the tax bill to insure that he
doesn't own it and get the seniors exemption in Forest Hills. We
' . 46 •
•
didn't hear from him in two months up until the other day, he never
supplied me with the information that I had requested, but I did tell
him also at the time how to go about establishing this as a primary
residence. It's going to take some time. It' s taking him time now
to decide, I mean all of his banking and everything is in Forest
Hills. There is nothing to indicate to us that he lives out here
full time, and even by his own admission, he lives in Forest Hills
all week and comes out weekends. We had given him a list of things
to supply to us, he didn't provide it to us, he originally told me he
did not own the house. It wasn' t until the other day he told me, no
he does own the house in Forest Hills, but unfortunately again we
never got a copy of the deed.
Mr. Arslanyan: Sir, may I say something? I never talk with you
regarding that first request you made. I never talk with you and you
didn't tell me that.
Mr. Russell: Yes, I did.
Mr. Arslanyan: No, sir I never had a telephone conversation with
you in my house. I never do this. I called you many times, you
didn' t call me. Never have you sent me a letter in my Greenport
house, and received a Congratulation, so you can send me a letter in
Greenport, and I can get it. I don't have to be like a prisoner and
stay in my home every morning and every night to wait for you to come
and give me papers, why don't you mail it to me? If you would have
mailed it to me, I would have answered it right away.
Mr. Russell: No sir, he was in Forest Hills.
Mr. Arslanyan: No sir.
Mr. Russell: I had a phone call with him back in March, I had
requested the information from him, and I didn' t hear from him.
Again, I even talked to him about the possibility of taking all the
information he has and let' s get him an exemption on the Forest Hills
house. He' s the owner of record, he' s entitled to it in Forest
Hills. I tried to offer to do that, but again, it was just the other
day that I had heard from him after a couple of months and it was
impossible to do anything at this point.
Mr. Sullivan: Sir, do you have an exemption on the Forest Hills
house now?
Mr. Arslanyan: No, I don't have it sir.
Mr. Sullivan: I 'm just asking you a question. You don't have an
exemption on the house?
Mr. Arslanyan: No, sir you got the telephone number in my letter,
here is the telephone number, you can ask, my old doctor' s number I
give.
•
410 47 •
Mr. Sullivan: Your doctor wouldn' t know if you got a senior citizens
exemption.
Mr. Russell: In February, we asked for a copy of the deed to that
house and also a copy of the tax bill. It' s our right as Assessors
to ask to establish the residency requirements in the statue. I
asked him in the end of February, he never supplied it to me,
yesterday he brought in a tax map number and a number to call in New
York to confirm that this is in fact a property that has no
exemptions on it. The 17 of May is long past the time that it should
have required him to supply the information.
Mr. Arslanyan: Sir, if you be kind enough, I been here two
months. You can ask the doctor, who takes care of me. This
gentleman here told me, yesterday this year you' re going to be denied
but try for next year. I said please help me sir, I need this
deduction because I am short of money, and he said to me this year
has been denied, I don' t think you have a chance, five persons at the
----Board decide that, that's what he said to me. He shouldn' t tell
me that, that means he' s giving my decision, he' s finalizing my case,
in my opinion, I 'm sorry to tell you that but that' s the case came
up. And I decided why this gentleman is doing this to me.
Mr. Burdy: Did you tell him because of the residency?
Mr. Russell: We sent him a notice out March 1, and we also asked him
on a phone call, I am sending the denial out, that by law I have to
do, I would ask you to please send me a copy of the deed and the tax
bill, to see if we could reconcile and rectify this whole issue. I
did tell him yesterday that by our way of looking at it, he doesn't
meet the primary residents requirements, but if he continues to do
the things and demonstrate to me the things that he is doing, then
the primary residency requirement is meet. I think he just, a couple
of weeks ago, changed the address on his license and the voter
registration.
Mr. Arslanyan: Because he asked me, you have to change your
license, and I did it. He said change the Board of Election, and I
did. Why didn' t he tell me in the beginning, two years ago. Nobody
asked me, and they granted me last year a tax deduction.
Mr. Russell: One last point, my position that you can' t become a
resident over night. If you come to me on Wednesday and said, give
me the things I need, give me a list and I ' ll to do it today and give
it to you tomorrow, I meet my residency requirements, but the law
doesn' t read that way. It says you have to be a resident of the town
for at least two years. He' s making a diligent effort, I will be the
first to admit that.
Mr. Arslanyan: When I become senior citizen, I am short of money.
If had money I wouldn't come here, I swear to God, I don' t need it.
But what upsets me, this is my right, and when I became a U.S.
citizen, Judge told me, don't let anybody step on your rights. This
gentleman is stepping on my rights, and I am trying to fight back.
• 48 411
•
That' s my right, and I 'm asking you, why they didn' t tell me, first
they grant me, they give me the deduction, whenever they ask, I give
it to them, but this year this gentleman came up, I don't know, maybe
he doesn't like me, but you have been denied. I said why, and he
said to me maybe you loose but next year you can try again. I don't
want to try again, I want to have my rights.
Mr. Burdy: What Mr. Russell is trying to point out, is I
understand your position, that maybe you thought he should have told
you about this a year or two years ago, but we will take all of that
into consideration. There is something I would like to point out, I
don't think he has his application filled out all the way.
Mr. Russell: I ' ll be happy to sit down with him and assist him in
that manner, I did know that he had trouble understanding some of the
writing, most people do.
Mr. Burdy: Would you help him then?
Mr. Russell: Absolutely.
Mr. Burdy: Mr. Arslanyan, do you have any more questions?
Mr. Arslanyan: No more questions.
Mr. Sullivan: Thank you very much for coming, we' ll let you know as
soon possible.
29) 1000-63-5-23
Mr. & Mrs. O.D. Lingo
650 Greenfields Lane
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Mr. Burdy: Raise your right hand, do you solemnly swear that the
information you give herein will be given accurately and truthfully
to the best of your ability?
Mr. & Mrs. Lingo: Yes, sir.
Mr. Burdy: Thank you.
Mr. Sullivan: Have you any comments to make before the Board?
Mr. Lingo: I 'd just like to say I think that the taxes for the
property are really too high, the reason why I don't thing that as
assessed for $200,000 and if I want to sell it I couldn' t get
$100,000 to $125,00 the most, so why is my taxes assessed so high?
Mr. Sullivan: Any comments from the Board?
Mrs. Duffy: Yes, I 'd like to point out that their assessment
hasn't changed since 1983 . The house has been assessed at a uniform
method of assessment, a cost of construction that we do for everyone
110 49 •
in the town of Southold, and I don' t see any sort of appraisal or any
kind of proof that' s been put before the Board.
Mr. Sullivan: I just have a couple of questions for Mr. & Mrs.
Lingo. Unfortunately your application doesn't give us anything to
work on as far as to substantiate the reason why you want your
assessed valuation reduced down to $4,100. 47 other then somebody
tells you or you feel that your house is only worth $130,000. Have
you got any idea what the houses in your neighborhood, next door are
assessed for?
Mrs. Lingo: Yes, I know of one that was put on the market for
$179,000 which is larger then ours and I couldn't believe it. I know
also down in ---Park, but this is the only thing I can back it up
with.
Mr. Sullivan: Do we have any comparable in that neighborhood?
Mrs. Duffy: This is the sales survey for the last year, and I
don't see any ratings in Mr. Lingo' s neighborhood.
Mrs. Lingo: There is a house like ours in Oregon Estates just like
ours and there is a sign but I didn't get the number off of it, but
it' s the same house.
Mr. Sullivan: Any further questions? Mr. & Mrs. Lingo I want to
thank you very much for coming here, and you will hear from us just
as soon as we can possibly make it.
End of May 18, 1993 Grievances
May 21,1993
The Board of Assessment Review meet on May 21, 1993 at 9:00 a.m.
Present were:
Thomas Burdy, Co-Chairman
William F. English Jr.
Francis A. Thorp
Robert H. Whelan
Joined by John Sullivan, Chairman at 9: 30 a.m.
Mr. Burdy: The Board of Assessment Review is now in session.
30) 1000-35-2-4
Rousos Abadiokatis
1516 East 15th Street
Brooklyn, N.Y. 11230
410 50 •
Mr. Burdy: Rousos Abadiokatis in Greenport and his mailing
address is in Brooklyn. He is asking for a disability.
Mr. Scott: The reason why he is asking for a reduction due to a
disability which is not a valid reason and he didn't specify the
amount he wanted the reduction to, and he submitted no proof. My
recommendation would be to deny. If there is an exemption provided
for, we'd be happy to give it to him, but since disability is
something that, other then veteran' s exemptions, which he is not a
veteran, then we can't provide him with an exemption or a reduction
based on something that there is no legislation for.
Mr. Thorp: If it has any bearing, this property is located on the
Main Road, opposite Gull Pond Lane and backs up in front of the
Island' s End Gulf Course.
Mr. Scott: In addition to which it has five acres of property, and
it has 5,288 square feet of living space of which we had given him
60% of depreciation on top of that. So it' s got a substantially
piece of property, substantially house, with a substantially
reduction already.
Mr. Whelan: So basically his claim is non-ability to pay.
Mr. Scott: That' s not a valid reason.
Mr. Whelan: Any other questions on this one?
Board: No.
31) 1000-122-6-31
Mr. Parviz Farahzad
22 Jericho Turnpike
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Burdy: Farahzad, Main Road, Laurel.
Mr. Thorp: This applicant is presently assessed at $31,150 and he is
requesting it be reduced to $15,000. The grounds for his complaint
is an unequal assessment.
Mr. Whelan: Any proof provided?
Mr. Thorp: I don't see any proof here other then a letter from his
attorney. Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed please find an original and
copy of a tax certiorari filing. Would you kindly stamp our copy as
received and return to this office in the enclosed envelope. I don' t
see the supporting documentation here. Did we receive it?
Board: No there is none.
Mr. Whelan: This picture looks like that whole complex, family
practices, and the restaurant.
51111
Mr. Thorp: The applicant is a real estate developer.
Mr. Burdy: Mr. Parviz Farahzad, Main Road, Laurel.
Mr. Thorp: This applicant is presently assessed at $31,150 and he is
requesting that it be reduced to $15,000. Grounds for his complaint
is an unequal assessment.
Mr. Whelan: Any proof provided?
Mr. Thorp: I don't see any proof here other than a letter from his
attorney saying, "Enclosed please find an original and a copy of the
tax certiorari filing. Would you kindly stamp our copy as received
and return it to this office in the enclosed envelope. " I don't see
the supporting documentation here.
Mr. Russell: Just to clarify, this is the fourth year in a row Mr.
Farahzad has filed and has yet to provide any estimates of value or
supporting documentation.
Mr. Scott: Possibly 90% of the cases or more do not provide proof at
this particular point.
Mr. Burdy: I can see that, that' s why I 'm not trying to rush this,
but I 'm trying to get through it.
Mr. Whelan: Basically, we can' t rule on them without any proof.
Now in a situation like this where we have a actual correspondence
stating a piece of documentation that doesn't exist, does that go on
stand by fly, or do we rule on it the way it sits?
Mr. Scott: Rule on it the way it sits because that' s what they sent
you. What they are saying is that they are going to Certiorari
before, it has no bearing on your interpretation, because they
haven't presented evidence at this point.
Mr. Whelan: That's Small Claims right?
Mr. Scott: This is the Grievance portion right now. This is a
commercial piece of property, so what they have to do, is they have
to go to the next highest section, and it wouldn't be Small Claims,
it would be Certiorari. One, two, and three family houses that are
not owned by corporations go to Small Claims.
32) 1000-111-10-16
Mr. Arnold Blair
4560 Vanston Road
Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935
Mr. Burdy: Are we ready? Arnold Blair, Cutchogue. He purchased the
property for $925,000 in 1987, no pool, no terrace, kitchen remodeled
in 1993, real assessment is not, can't read what that word is, with
cost of work done to which assessment is based. The full value of
r ' • 52
the property is $925,000 and the assessed value appearing on the roll
is $14,500. The property owner's estimate of current value is
$900,000.
Mr. Scott: Can we have a quick interjection here?
Mr. Burdy: Sure, say whatever you want.
Mrs. Duffy: His assessment reflects his market value of $447,000. I
talked with Mr. Blair at length about this and he doesn't think he is
going to pursue it. I said, Arnold you paid a million bucks for this
house, I got you at $447,000, what are you grieving? He said, I
know, I know, I just feel bad. They came and they jacked it up
$1,200. I said Arnold, sorry I don't think you have something here
but do whatever. He told me he was going to withdraw, but I don' t
really know how you do that.
Mr. Scott: You send a letter.
Mr. Burdy: So what is your recommendation?
Mr. Scott: The recommendation is that you don' t consider it because
his estimation of value is $900,000 and if you take the adjusted
R.A.R. 3 . 24, it adds up to be $290,160, it' s at $14,500. His own
estimate is almost twice as much as what the present assessment is.
If it is unequal, it' s unequal in his favor by a large degree. I
think it is fairly evident.
Mr. Thorp: Does his property include the other side of the road?
Mr. Scott: This is the only one on that side.
Mrs. Duffy: This parcel is on the water.
Mr. Scott: He' s only grieving the one section.
33) 1000-113-7-19. 17
Ms. Arline Boeckman
Fred N. Perry, Esquire
175 Deer Park Rd.
Dix Hills, N.Y. 11746
Mr. Burdy: Ms. Arline Boeckman, Mattituck, property owners
current assessment of true market value is $80,000, request that it
should be reduced to $1,000 grounds unequal assessment. It' s a one
or two family home. What does that mean?
Mr. Russell: Whether you choose to have two families or not it' s
solely at the discretion of the owner.
Mr. Burdy: $110,000 is the assessed value appearing on the
assessment roll.
53 411
Mr. Russell: It' s $11,000.
34) 1000-45-2-10. 3
North Fork Bank as mortgagee
c/o Certiman, Balin, Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Avenue
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Mr. Sullivan: The North Fork Bank.
Mr. Thorp: Question for the Assessors, are they doing this for the
benefit of the mortgagor?
Mr. Scott: No, they took it back.
Mr. Burdy: What do you have to say about this?
Mr. Russell: No proof.
Mr. Scott: No proof, and they' re planning to go to Certiorari. This
is the San Simeon Retirement Community up there that they abandoned.
Mr. Thorp: That senior citizens development on Chapel Lane in
Greenport.
35) 1000-141-1-37. 2
George E. & Frances Toth
111 Haverford Road
Hicksville, N.Y. 11801
Mr. Burdy: George E. & Frances Toth, Southold. I believe my
current assessment should be reduced to $418,50, this is based on the
following calculations: Current market value of property, State
Equalization Rate, then he gives the numbers $165,000, calculations
based on the instructions in the New York State Tax Payers Guide.
They live in a one family dwelling, three bedroom ranch, two car
garage built in 1976.
Mr. Whelan: Comments Bob?
Mr. Burdy: The certification of the appraiser, is this an official
certification?
Mr. Russell: Yes.
Mr. Scott: Andy is a licensed N.Y. State appraiser.
Mr. Russell: These are very conservative appraisals specifically one
for either refinancing, which is conservative, or for tax reduction
challenges. We'd also like to stress that the E.R. , we don' t believe
is appropriate for residential property, and we would ask you to give
way to 3. 24 R.A.R.
111 54 i
Mr. Whelan: Does the Assessors Department have a viewpoint on this
new quick sale appraisal?
Mr. Russell: Yes, absolutely conservative. We have appraisers that
do the bulk of quick sale appraisals, who would be happy to address
you at anytime, and tell you that they are directed to calculate a
conservative. . .
Mr. Whelan: How conservative are you talking, do you feel we are
talking 20%, 40%?
Mr. Russell: It depends on the property because you are going to
have a range of value for any property. The quick sale appraisal is
going to give you that low range of value. I would say about 10%
Mr. Scott: I would say 10%. If you see something as a refinance,
and if you added about 10% for a legitimate refinance appraisal,
that' s about the ball park whether it's a $900,000 place or $130,000.
Mr. Whelan: And as far as a time frame on a standard appraisal,
let' s say a legitimate appraisal, are we looking at a sale within a
years time?
Mr. Scott: A year' s time in my opinion, is valid.
Mr. Whelan: Anything will sell in a month if it is priced right.
Mr. Scott: Anything more then a year is stretching it.
Mr. Whelan: So we are looking at an annual, and we feel that the
10% on it.
Mr. Russell: The state defines the value for one given period by a
whole, so we think that is fine.
36) 1000-74-1-35. 57
CPF Enterprises
Box 495
Amagansett, N.Y. 11930
Mr. Burdy: In order to move along as quickly as we can, when I
read off the general knowledge, if you have something to say, please
intercede.
Mr. Scott: Can I ask you to look, because there is another one filed
also, CPF Enterprises is filed twice, by two different
representatives.
Mr. Burdy: This is the one after it, right Mario J. Fusaro.
Mr. Scott: Yes, so you might as well consider them both at one
time. In both cases, they have presented this as one building lot
and they have gotten a letter of opinion in one case, and they've got
411 55 i
no proof in the other. The letter of opinion has absolutely no
value. The Assessors will take a look at this property next year,
for sure if we find out that the one lot situation is as it is.
Mr. Sullivan: This is a 47 acre track, just about opposite the
Mobile Station on the North Road in Peconic.
Mr. Thorp: The assessment, $14,600 works out to $310 an acre and
they're requesting that it be reduced to $6,300 total which is $134
an acre.
Mr. Scott: The $300 an acre which we have it for represents about
$12,000 an acre on the open market which is not unreasonable at this
particular point. $14,000 to $20,000 an acre is normal for large
tracks of land.
Mr. Sullivan: Do we have an assessment card on that? Was this
formerly owned by Adams?
Mr. Scott: It's on the previous card so I couldn't tell you. This
was the Blue Horizon which was abandoned. A curb cut was put in and
then dropped. It' s adjacent to Henry' s Lane.
37) 1000-74-1-35.57
CPA Enterprises
c/o Mario J. Fusaro
309A Little Plains Road
Huntington, N.Y. 11743
Discussed together with #36.
38) 1000-122-4-15,16
Richard S. & Lorraine M. Burden
2800 Old Jule Lane
Mattituck, N.Y. 11952
Mr. Sullivan: It' s on James Creek.
Mr. Burdy: Both properties are priced substantially below the 1986
price. The failure of people to dredge the property behind the house
has led to totally innavigable water on waterfront property. This
has brought the resale of these homes down tremendously. Part of
this condition was created by the major storms to hit the area. A
regular one family dwelling, four bedrooms, split-level, attached
garage, separate parcel with garage. Excellently maintained. He's
complaining of unequal assessment. What do you have to say about
this one, Mr. Russell? He doesn't have any figures.
Mr. Russell: It's an incomplete application and he provides no proof.
Mr. Whelan: I suggest that that be the first thing we look for is
some kind of proof because it seems the majority of them have no
411 56 411
proof. Does waterfront property have to be navigable in the term of
waterfront?
Mr. Scott: No, because there are different rates that apply. It
depends on the position of the waterfront, whether it' s direct bay or
direct Sound, or whether it's on a canal, or whether it has a view,
or whether it' s navigable, or whether it is bulkheaded. There are
degrees of frontage that we do, so it can go from as low as $10 a
front foot to as much as $40 a front foot depending on the type of
waterfront.
Mr. Whelan: I may request that information if you have it.
39) 1000-111-9-6. 3
Ms. Mildred S. Bennett
1714 Claw Court
Venice, Fl. 34293
It' s currently assessed for $15,900. They are requesting that it be
reduced to $11,795. It' s based on the latest ratio established at
3 .37.
Mr. Scott: They give you a ratio, but you don' t have to use that
ratio. You can use the one that is most appropriate.
Mr. Russell: There is no proof here and if you look at the front of
the property card, you' ll see that due diligence was made by the
Assessors to reconcile any differences with the value with the
owner. We've reduced it substantially, subsequent to three reviews,
and he still doesn't provide any proof. Besides, the lot next door
just sold for $460,000 and it' s a vacant piece of land.
40 1000-111-9-6. 2
Mr. James D. Bennett
34 Hilton Ave.
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Mr. Sullivan: No proof?
Mr. Scott: No proof and we have gone and looked at it two or three
times in the last year and we've made substantial changes at Judge
Bennett's request.
Mr. Sullivan: Did I understand Scott to say that the adjoining lot
was sold for how much?
Mr. Scott: Yes, $460,000 for an adjoining vacant lot.
Mr. Sullivan: Mr. James D. Bennett, vacant lot with pool and
changing cabana, land is assessed at $3,200, a total of $4,600. I
guess that is a vacant lot, improvements $4,600. Do the Assessors
have any comments?
411 57•
i
Mr. Russell: Yes, it has no proof whatsoever.
Mr. Scott: The equalization rate that they were using, is not
appropriate, it should be 2.49 instead of 2.38, if it was to be used.
Mr. Burdy: What do they have on there?
Mr. Scott: 2. 38, last years rate.
41) 1000-78-9-68
Catholic Charities Mental
c/o Bennett Pape Rice & Schure
255 Merrick Road, P.O. Box 710
Rockville Center, N.Y. 11571
Mr. Sullivan: Catholic Charities assessed value appearing on the
assessment roll, property is holy exempt, March 1993 it was put on
the active roll for 1993-1994. Any comments from the Assessors?
Mrs. Duffy: Yes, apparently I think they were willed this piece of
property. There is a little ranch house and it' s in a residential
neighborhood in Southold. So there are houses all around it, and
this is a corner piece that is completely wooded. The statue says
that they have to use if for religious purposes in order to get the
exemption. They can't just own it.
Mr. Sullivan: What are they using if for?
Mr. Russell: Nothing.
Mr. Sullivan: Nobody is in the house?
Mrs. Duffy: This isn' t the house, this is the parcel of property.
We're giving them the exemption on the house and I think they are
renting the house out. I don't think they're using the house for
religious purposes either, but I can't prove it. The lot is heavily
wooded, there are no paths, you can' t walk on it, you can't be
communing with nature or anything.
Mr. Sullivan: Where is this at?
Mr. Scott: It' s right off of Main Bay View on the corner.
Mrs. Duffy: It's just a lot and I don' t think we can give them an
exemption on it.
Mr. Scott: This is an estate that was willed to Catholic Charities.
Just because it is willed to a not for profit organization, to get an
exemption you have to use it for those same purposes, and this is a
vacant lot that they are holding on to and probably going to sell in
the future. That's a different story. The house that they are
using, we can' t tell that they're using it for other purposes then
what they' re suppose to be using it for, we have to continue to use
• 58
the exemption, but a vacant piece of property, does not qualify for
an exemption.
Mr. English, Jr. : So this is the same situation across from the
church in Mattituck, which was recently put on the tax roll?
Mr. Scott: The church it' s self was sold to someone who was for
profit.
Mr. English,Jr. : I 'm talking about the Episcopal Church in
Mattituck, who owns some lots that are not being used.
Mr. Russell: Only on the house, the church is holy exempt. There' s
a vacant house on Mary's Road that is not being used for anything and
was left to the church and we had no choice but to re-enroll it.
Mr. Sullivan: Then it has been placed on the taxable status?
Mr. Russell: Absolutely.
Mrs. Duffy: This is where the lot is on the map, it' s a vacant lot
staring into the woods. It did say on the application it is a mental
health facility.
42) 1000-111-9-6. 1
Ms. Judith B. Moore
610 W. Wisteria Ave.
Arcadia, Ca. 91006
Mr. Sullivan: Name and address, phone number of representive of
owner, James B. Bennett, Rockville Center. The land is assessed at
$3,900.
Mr. Thorp: In order to speed this up, the applicant is Judith
Bennett Moore. This is an adjoining piece of property to the others
of James Bennett and also Mildred Bennett.
Mr. Sullivan: Do the Assessors have any comments?
Mr. Russell: Just that there is no proof and it isn' t a vacant lot,
there are structures on it.
Mr. Sullivan: There are structures on it?
Mr. Russell: 24 by 24 garage and tool shed. This is part of the
original subdivision, it used to be all one lot with the big house
that we heard before. They have subsequently subdivided it and
removed the ownership into different names.
43) 1000-121-5-3
Mr. Stephen J. Perricone
7470 Sound Ave. , Box 41
• 59 •
Mattituck, N.Y. 11952
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $8,000 and would like it reduced to $5,000.
Mr. Scott: There is a listing from Jim Gray that says it' s worth
$55,000. We dispute that. We called up the people from Jim Gray
yesterday. There is no proof that they have at all. Just to give
you an idea in 1988, which is when he first put the property on and
he just put it on for $55,000, he was asking $318,000. We submit
that there is no formal proof that should be considered in this
particular instance.
Mr. Thorp: That' s the fence company on the end of the divided
highway in Mattituck.
44) 1000-123-2-11
Mr. Gene Doroski
720 Bungalow Lane
Mattituck, N.Y. 11952
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $5,900. I don't know what he wants it
reduced to. He says it' s unequal assessment and there is no amount
in here, there is nothing else checked.
Mr. Whelan: Any proof provided?
Mr. Sullivan: There is nothing filled here, no.
Mr. Thorp: Actually, this has frontage on two streets, Bungalow Lane
and also Center Street.
Mr. Sullivan: Comments from the Board?
Mr. Scott: He' s got no estimate of value and he' s got no suggestion
of what he wants it reduced to.
45) 1000-109-5-14. 17
Carmin & Dorothy Aiello
c/o Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. Sullivan: Carmin & Dorthy Aiello.
Mr. Thorp: I would just like to say at this time that these are
friends of mine, so I have no comment.
Mr. Sullivan: He' s saying that the total assessed value is $13 ,400
and requested that it be reduced to the full value of $33,500. Where
is this in Mattituck?
Mr. Thorp: It' s on Fairview Farms.
. 60
Mr. Sullivan: Assessors have any comments?
Mr. English Jr. : Assessed at $13 ,400 and he wants it at $33 ,500.
Mr. Russell: No proof, it' s self-evident and also Robert Capasso
who is the representative in this case, all the applications were
signed by the same person for authorization, we'd ask that you really
compare the signatures and we ask that these get dismissed because of
false filing.
Mr. Sullivan: Who submitted this?
Mr. Russell: Robert Capasso, West Islip Tax Reduction Inc. and
they are all evidently signed by the same person.
Mr. Scott: Each individual owner is suppose to sign, and if you will
notice, we gave you three or four from Mr. Capasso and they are all
signed by the same hand.
Mr. Sullivan: Are they all in the same location?
Mr. Scott: All on Fairway Farms
Mr. Sullivan: How many of those do we have?
Mr. Scott: About nine or ten of them.
Mr. Sullivan: Any questions from the Board?
46) 1000-9-11-2.6
c/o Peter Brinckerhoff
Ashcol Inc.
25 Lake Drive
Riverside, Ct. 06878
Mr. Sullivan: Fisher' s Island, assessed at $10,900 and wants it
reduced to $8,330, we' ll go over this during decisions but any
comments from the Assessors?
Mr. Scott: Yes sir, three things. First he is using the wrong rate,
second of all he states that the value is $350,000 and when you
divide that by the R.A.R. , the $10,900 that we have it assessed for
shows that we are assessing it for a value of $336,419 which is less
then what he states it is worth right now, and three he has no proof.
Mr. Sullivan: Any questions?
Board: No questions.
47) 1000-115-6-3
Frederick & Dolores Boeje
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
61 411
•
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $5,300 and the property owner' s estimate
of current value is $64,112.
Mr. Thorp: It' s located on the Main Road in Mattituck, just east of
Carnial Drive, a half an acre of land.
Mr. Sullivan: Any comments by the Assessors?
Mr. Russell: No proof.
Mr. Sullivan: Any questions by the Board?
48) 1000-109-5-14. 6
Thomas & Anne M. Boucher
P.O. Box 1260
Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935
Mr. Sullivan: He is assessed at $11,100 and says the fair market
value $285,000, purchase price was $275,000. He lists lot numbers
here, lot 1426, 1514, 14.8 with the assessed valuation. It is also
claimed that the properties in Fairway Farms development are, as a
whole, assessed excessively, especially in view of the fact that the
homes do not front public roadways.
Mr. Thorp: Is this by the same. . .
Mr. Sullivan: No. "Kindly grant the applicants time to gather
comparable assessment values outside of the Fairway Farms development
area. Thank you. " Any comments by the Assessors?
Mr. Russell: The closing title isn't true. It is also two years old
and they have subsequently put an addition on to the property which
they don' t have included in the value. Also I 'm sure you are aware
that private or public roads are irrelevant to the property value.
Mr. Scott: In addition to that portion that Scott just said, the
estimate of $12,000 for the addition which was 540 square feet. I
asked Mrs. Boucher and she said that her husband and his friends
did the renovation themselves. You can' t consider the $12,000 to be
a cost because there is labor intensity that has to be added into it
to make it a market value.
Mr. Russell: A similar addition would run you $65 to $75 a square
foot.
Mr. Burdy: She said it cost $12,000?
Mr. Scott: On the Building Permit, $12,000, that' s what it cost
them. That' s material only and we as Assessors have to take a look
• 62 •
at what it would be regardless of who built it. We have to make it a
fair market value for everybody, not just the cost.
Mr. Burdy: I just want to get that clear.
Mr. Sullivan: Any other questions from the Board?
Mr. English, Jr. : What was he looking for if he is assessed at
$11,100 now?
Mr. Sullivan: It' s assessed at $329,000 and he wants it reduced to
$285,000 or $295,000. Any other questions?
49) 1000-8-1-6.5
Mr. Peter Brinckerhoff
25 Lake Drive
Riverside, Ct. 06878
Mr. Sullivan: Peter Brinckerhoff, Fishers Island, is assessed at
$28,400 and he says the market value of his house is $1,160,250. He
says the assessment should be reduced from $28,400 to $21,975.
Mr. Thorp: Six point seven acres.
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman, in the interest of brevity, Mr.
Brinckerhoff when to the Small Claims and he also was given a
reduction last years which carried through to this tax assessment
period now. In addition, he' s stating that the $28,400 that is on
the assessment roll, he' s stating that the value of his property is
$1,160,250. If you take the $28,400 and divide it by the .0324 which
is the Equalization Ratio, you' ll see that we're coming up with a
market value of $876,543 which is approximately $200,000 less then
what he is saying is the value of the property is. He' s under
assessed.
Mr. Sullivan: You are saying he is assessed less then. . . Anything
else?
Mr. Sullivan: Any questions?
Board: No questions.
50) 1000-122-3-1.4
Mr. Alan A. Cardinale
c/o Certilman, Balin, Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Avenue
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Mr. Sullivan: Who scratched this out, $19,400 up to $23 ,900?
Mr. Scott: That' s done by the people from the Certiorari Courts, the
people that are filing for them. The attorneys come in and check the
• 63 i
rolls and if they see that there has been a change, they cross it out
and make a change for them.
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed value of $23 ,900 and he wants it reduced to
$5,975. Is this commercial?
Mr. Scott: A portion of it is commercial. The front several acres
are commercial. Then they have a separate residential portion that' s
on the creek back there that has 330 feet of waterfront, which they
built a house that has 3,561 square feet on it. So they got a
combination of, there is a total of 15.9 acres of which the vast
majority of that is commercial on the Main Road. Then they have a
large portion of it that is waterfront with a . . . .
Mr. Sullivan: How many acres is that again?
Mr. Scott: 15.9 acres and they have submitted no proof at all to
substantiate their claim to value.
Mr. Sullivan: Any other questions?
51) 1000-126-2-15. 1
Mr. Edward D. Carney
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mr. Thorp: The designation on this Carney application #51 is not Bay
front property, according to the section, block and lot numbers that
we' re. . .
Mr. Scott: 15.1 is on Horton' s Creek, waterfront.
Mr. Thorp: Well, it' s not actually waterfront property because
you've got a lot in front of it. It's owned by the Nature
Conservatory 4. 2.
Mr. Russell: No proof, that' s concerning with the assist I assume
and we would like to wave our right to comment on those, only on the
ones where there are questions involved.
Mr. Sullivan: The only thing we are going to ask you to comment on,
is if there is no proof, then there is no proof. We have to go
through it anyway.
52) 1000-128-6-13 . 3
Mr. Victor E. Catalano
P.O. Box 516
Laurel, N.Y. 11948
Mr. Sullivan: Victor E. Catalano, located on Peconic Bay Blvd,
currently assessed at $10,000. He believed he should be assessed at
$200,000. Comments from the Assessors?
• 64 .
Mr. Russell: No proof.
53 ) 1000-109-5-14. 32
Gladys & Ors Cole
c/o Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. Scott: Gladys Cole is one of the ones that were unlawful.
Mr. Sullivan: They were what?
Mr. Scott: Unlawfully done with the authorization signature.
Mr. Sullivan: Any other comments?
54) 1000-109-5-14. 20
Mr. William Concagh
c/o Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. Sullivan: William Concagh.
Mr. Scott: Another example of the unlawful application by Mr.
Capasso.
Mr. Sullivan: Did Capasso get all of these people on Fairway Farm?
Mr. Scott: All of them, except for the one. . .
55) 1000-115-6-4
Stephen J. Suzanne A. Conlin
18700 Main Rd. , P.O. Box 1078
Mattituck, N.Y. 11952
Mr. Sullivan: Stephen and Suzanne Conlin, assessed value at
$228,000 and he wants it reduced to $169,000. Comments from the
Assessors?
Mr. Russell: It' s a refinance appraisal, very conservative from my
point of view, a refinance conservative in its nature.
56) 1000-40-3-3 . 5
Scott Corwin
c/o Siegel Fenchel & Peddy, P.C.
777 Zeckendorf Blvd.
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
65
410
57) 1000-64-2-15
Mr. Peter T. Demetriou
c/o Wimpfheimer & Sherman, Esqs.
1100 Franklin Avenue - Suite PH400
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Mr. Sullivan: Peter T. Demetrious, assessed at $7,100 and wants it
reduced to $1,595. Any comments from the Board?
Mrs. Duffy: I don' t think they provided any proof for a reduction.
58) 1000-37-4-1
Ms. Judith DiBlasi
c/o Wimpfheimer & Sherman, Esqs.
110Q Franklin Avenu Suite PH400
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Mr. Sullivan: Judith DiBlasi, assessed at $8,425 and asking
$1,695. Reduced from $9,400 to $8,425 by the Grievance Board in
1992. Any comments?
Mr. Scott: There is no proof submitted.
59) 1000-109-5-14. 16
Ms. Catherine Drake
c/o Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. Sullivan: Catherine Drake, Fairway Drive, assessed at $10, 500
and wants it reduced to $2,625. Any comments?
Mr. Russell: No proof and unlawful signature, this is another
Capasso case.
60) 1000-9-10-9. 2
F.I . Parade Grounds Apts. Ltd.
c/o Certilman, Balin, Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Avenue
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Mr. Sullivan: Fisher Island Parade Grounds, assessed at $27,200 and
want it reduced to $6,800. Comments?
Mr. Scott: There is no proof submitted.
61) 1000-109-5-14. 13
Ms. Elizabeth Ann Fett
c/o Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
• 66 •
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. Sullivan: Elizabeth Ann Fett, assessed at $12,500 and looking
for a reduction of $3,125. Anything from the Board?
Board: Another Capasso.
62) 1000-123-5-31
Mr. Peter S. Gray, Sr.
c/o Koeppel Martone Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Peter S. Gray Sr. , has an assessed value of $5,300 and
would like it reduced to $1,325. Comments by the Assessors?
Mr. Russell: No proof.
63 ) 1000-96-3-8
Edward J. Jr. & Sarah Hansen
1355 Cox Lane
Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935
Mr. Sullivan: Edward and Sarah Hansen, assessed at $6,200 and wants
it reduced to $4,990. Any comments from the Assessors?
Mr. Russell: It' s a refinancing appraisal, conservative.
64) 1000-109-5-14. 12
John B. Hayes
c/o Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. Sullivan: John Bo Hayes, assessed at $12,200 wants it reduced
to $3 ,050. Any comments?
Mr. Russell: Another Capasso.
65) 1000-109-5-14. 30
Mr. Walter Hennessey
c/o Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. Sullivan: Walter Hennessy, assessed at $21,500, wants it
reduced to $5,375. Any comments?
Mr. Russell: Capasso.
• 67 ,
Mr. English Jr. : Do you think Mr. Capasso will come back and
challenge us on any of these?
Mr. Scott: It' s kind of unusual for nine people in the same
community to have the same style of writing.
66) 1000-117-3-6
Mr. Frederick Koehler Jr.
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Frederick W. Koehler, assessed at $26,400 and
requesting it be reduced to $7,920. Waterfront property on Cutchogue
Harbor.
67) 1000-113-6-14. 4
Joel & Chizuko Kroin
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C.
1505 Kellum Place
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $5,900 and they would like it reduced to
$1,850.
68) 1000-70-13-5
Phillip & Annabelle Loeser
c/o Santemma & Deutsch
120 Mineola Blvd. , Suite 510
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,900 and would like it reduced
to $1,475.
69) 1000-36-2-26.1
Mr. Herbert Mandel
c/o Siegel Fenchel & Peddy, P.C.
777 Zeckendorf Blvd.
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $12,000 and would like it reduced to the
market value of $120,000 or $3,000. Comments by the Assessors?
Mr. Scott: Yes sir, two things. There is no proof, presently it' s
on the calendar additionally in the Certiorari Court, and I 'm
confident the Board of Assessors would be willing to accept for the
1993-1994 tax roll whatever the Court's decision is in Certiorari.
Mr. Sullivan: It' s in Court? Any other questions?
. 68
70) 1000-59-3-32.3
Mr. David J. Markel
Box 436
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $7,900 and would like it
assessed at $6,225. Comments from the Assessors?
Mrs. Duffy: I don't think he is offering any substantiating
evidence.
Mr. Sullivan: No proof.
71) 1000-79-8-1
Mr. Thomas B. Middlemiss
c/o Santemma & Deutsch
120 Mineola Blvd. , Suite 510
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $7,100 and would like it reduced
to $1,175. Comments?
Mrs. Duffy: Yes, they don' t have any proof.
72) 1000-31-18-10
Daniel C. & Maureen M. Mooney
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C.
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,700 and would like it reduced
to $4,000. Comments?
Mr. Scott: There' s no proof again, and she' s gone to Small Claims
the last two years in a row and lost each time.
Mr. Thorp: This is down on Robert Lane in East Marion.
73) 1000-122-3-4
Ms. Maureen Mooney
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C.
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $3,200 and would like it reduced to
$1,000. Is this improved property?
Mr. Russell: Yes, both of them are improved.
74) 1000-109-5-14. 26
69411
Mr. Theodore Mysliborski
c/o Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $7,400 and would like it reduced to
$1,850. A one family dwelling. Any comments?
Mr. Russell: Capasso.
Mr. Whelan: With the Capasso we are assuming no proof and an
unlawful signature, right?
75) 1000-88-4-17
Vito & Ann Navarra
c/o Certilman, Balin, Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Avenue
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Mr. Sullivan: Vito & Ann Navarra, assessed at $7,500 and wants
it reduced to $1,875. Comments?
Mrs. Duffy: Yes, he has no proof.
Mr. Sullivan: Is that it?
Mrs. Duffy: That' s it.
76) 1000-44-2-3
Mr. Anthony Pirrera
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Anthony Pirrera, assessed at $18,200 and wants it
reduced to $5,460. Comments?
Mr. Scott: Yes sir, two comments. First of all he did not submit
any proof. The second thing is the $18,200 divided by the R.A.R.
shows that we' re assessing it for less then $565.000. I called the
local real estate broker's office, and he has got it currently listed
for one point four million dollars, which is about two and a half
times what we've got it assessed for. I think he is under-assessed
and he has substantiallyno proof at all.
77) 1000-109-5-14.34
Mr. Harold Pownall
c/o Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
. 411 70
Mr. Sullivan: Harold Pownall, he is assessed at $9,700. Any
comments?
Mr. Russell: Another Capasso and no proof.
78) 1000-109-3-2.40
John & Barbara Prestia
P.O. Box 66
Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935
Mr. Sullivan: John & Barbara Prestia, assessed at $7,900 and wants
it reduced to $6,443 . Any comments?
Mr. Russell: Yes they supply information but it is not an appraisal,
it's a letter of opinion from a company based in Babylon. We would
argue that is insufficient prove.
Mr. Thorp: Is this Country Club Drive?
Mr. Russell: No, Moore' s Lane.
Mr. Scott: Yes, it is lot %32 Country Club Estates. They have
received a reduction from a 1991 Grievance Board.
Mr. Sullivan: Anything else?
79) 1000-118-2-3
Pudge Corp.
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C.
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Pudge Corporation, assessed at $25,500 and he wants
it reduced to $6,300.
Mr. Thorp: Located on Nassau Point.
Mr. Sullivan: Assessor?
Assessors: No proof.
80) 1000-100-3-11. 10
Carol & Neal Raffe
Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. Sullivan: Neal & Carol Raffe, currently assessed at $9,700 and
want a reduction $2,500. Any comments?
Assessors: Capasso.
• 71 411
.
81) 1000-33-3-2, 3
Ms Florence Rushmore
Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. Sullivan: Florence Rushmore, assessed at $10,500 and wants it
reduced to $2,625. Comments?
Assessors: Capasso.
82) 1000-109-5-14. 28
Frances Sanner
Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. Sullivan: Frances Sanner, assessed at $8,300 and wants it
reduced to $2,075. Comments?
Assessors: Capasso.
83 ) 1000-111-14-22.1
Dominick L & Pauline Segrete
c/o Koeppel Martone Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Dominick L. & Pauling Segrete, assessed at $9,400
and want it reduced to $2,350. Comments?
Mrs. Duffy: Yes, they don't really offer any proof, it' s just that
they have a statement here that says the assessment was unlawful
based an assessment practice of selective or spot re-assessment that
has been declared illegal. That was not the case, it wasn' t a
selective re-assessment. We re-assessed it because of the Building
Permit.
Mr. Burdy: But there is some proof?
Mrs. Duffy: No, they are just saying that we went there
unlawfully, but we went there because of the Building Permit.
84) 1000-113-2-16
Ms Barbara Senia
c/o Santemma & Deutsch
120 Mineola Blvd, Suite 510
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
72 410
Mr. Sullivan: Barbara Senia, assessed at $8,718 and wants it
reduced to $1,179. Just a quick comment here, the Grievance Board of
1992 reduced it $5,400 down to $4,718.
Mr. Whelan: The current is $4,718?
Mr. Sullivan: Comments?
Mr. Russell: No proof.
85) 1000-105-2-1
Mr. Thomas T Shannon
c/o Siegel Fenchel & Peddy, P.G.
777 Zeckendorf Blvd.
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Mr. Sullivan: Thomas T. Stannon, assessed at $18,125 and wants it
reduced to $4,531. Comments?
Mr. Russell: There is no proof.
86) 1000-35-5-24
Mr. Angelo Silveri
c/o Siegel Fenchel & Peddy, P.C.
777 Zeckendorf Blvd.
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Mr. Sullivan: Angelo Silveri, currently assessed at $12,550 and
wants it reduced to $3,137. Comments?
Assessors: No proof.
87) 1000-111-12-7. 2
Ms Henrietta Silverman
c/o Santemma & Deutsch
120 Mineola Blvd, Suite 510
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Henrietta Silverman, currently assessed at $21,300
and wants a reduction to $5,325. Comments?
Mr. Russell: Yes, there is no authorization from the owner. This is
filed without their signature, and there is no proof.
Mr. Sullivan: What?
Mr. Russell: There is no authorization from the owner. This is
filed by a law firm without a signature.
Mr. Burdy: Why would they do that?
i 73 i
Mr. Russell: A zealous attorney, or I don' t know.
Mr. Burdy: Did you speak to the owner?
Mr. Scott: We don' t have to Tom.
Mr. Burdy: Why not?
Mr. Scott: They are suppose to provide authorization if they have
somebody else as their agent.
Mr. Whelan: So you are recommending dismissal?
Mr. Russell: For all we know they could have gotten the name out of
the phone book.
88) 1000-63-7-13
Mr. Anton F. Skwara Jr.
245 Grigonis Path
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Mr. Sullivan: Anton F. Skwara Jr. , currently assessed at $8,900
and would like it reduced to $8,000.
Mrs. Duffy: The owner supplies no proof of value and just for
argument sake, he' s filled in the application with wrong Equalization
Rate.
Mr. Sullivan: Anything else?
89) 1000-109-5-14. 15
Mr. Robert Snowden
c/o Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. Sullivan: Robert Snowden, assessed at $9,200 and wants it
reduced to $2,300. Any comments?
Assessors: Capasso.
90) 1000-35-5-13
Mr. Howard C. Stabile
c/o Siegel Fenchel & Peddy, P.C.
777 Zeckendorf Blvd.
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Mr. Sullivan: Howard C. Stabile, currently assessed at $8,700 wants
it reduced to $2,175. Any comments?
Mr. Scott: No proof.
74 a
91) 1001-6-2-23 . 1
Sterlington Commons Associates
c/o Moroze, Sherman, Gordon &
Gordon, P.C. c/o Siegel et. al
777 Zeckendorf Blvd.
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Mr. Sullivan: Sterlington Commons, currently assessed at $63,400
and wants it reduced to $15,850. Comments.
Mr. Scott: This is a commercial piece of property, the appraisal
that they supply is only a portion of one, it' s not a full appraisal.
Mr. Thorp: When you say it's not a full appraisal Bob, are you
saying that it does not cover the entire parcel, or is it just an
incomplete appraisal?
Mr. Scott: I 'm just saying that it is an incomplete appraisal.
Mr. Thorp: Then there is no proof?
Mr. Scott: Well, there is proof but it' s insufficient proof, and I
would say that if you want us to take a look at it then I would ask
that we have three days to look it over. I 'm just saying that it is
a complicated appraisal and we are looking at it for the first time.
Mr. Sullivan: This is the first time you've had it?
Mr. Scott: Basically, it' s a portion of an appraisal, it is
commercial, it should be looked at with view to the Equalization Rate.
Mr. Sullivan: Do you need until tomorrow?
Mr. Scott: It' s an opinion of value, so it is insufficient proof in
our opinion. It' s not a full appraisal.
Mr. Sullivan: O.K. we've got partial appraisal, commercial, any
other comments.
Mr. Scott: No.
92) 1000-97-3-11. 3
Mr. Ronald E. & Maria Strain
P.O. Box 1504
Riverhead, N.Y. 11901
Mr. Sullivan: Strain, currently assessed at $9,900 and wants it
reduced to $7, 128. Any comments?
Mr. Russell: I would just add that the asking price of $230,000 is
as close to the opinion of value of $220,000 since it hasn' t sold
yet, so I 'm not establishing $220,000 as it' s indicative market value
and that you use the R.A.R. to calculate.
• 75
if 0
93 ) 1000-102-7-8
John P. & Arlene S. Sullivan
1760 Crown Land Lane
Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935
Mr. Sullivan: John & Arlene Sullivan, assessed value of $11,800 and
wants it reduced to $10,844. I will declare my interest and leave
the Board at this time.
Mr. Russell: No proof.
94) 1000-109-5-14.27
Ms Dorothy Syracuse
c/o Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. Sullivan: Dorothy Syracuse, is currently assessed at $8,300 and
would like it reduced to $2,075.
Mr. Thorp: Fairway Farms, Capasso.
95) 1000-109-5-14. 21
Curtis & Amelia Weber
Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. Sullivan: Curtis Weber, assessed at $10,500 and he' s asked for
$2,625.
Mr. Whelan: This is a Capasso too?
96) 1000-103-5-2. 2
George, Kostas, & Ted Zachariadis
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Zachariadis, Ted, George, & Kostas assessed at
$9,200 and they want a reduction to $2,760. Any comments?
Mr. Russell: No proof and please notice your magnanimous reduction
of 1981 from $9,300 to $9,200.
97) 1000-110-1-12
Cutchogue Harbor Marina, Inc.
c/o Michael Bender
45 Gazza Blvd.
Farmingdale, N.Y. 11735
• 76 •
Mr. Sullivan: Cutchogue Harbor, assessed at $20,500 and he wants it
decreased to $14, 317. 50.
Mr. Whelan: Is there any proof stipulated there?
Mr. Sullivan: Yes, he said there is some that we are going to have
to take a look at.
98) 1000-133-1-9
Mr. John Dinos
821 Boulevard East
Weehawken, N.J. 07087
Mr. Sullivan: John Dinos, 263 acres of osysterponds, he wants
it reduced from $3,100 to 0.
99) 1000-114-12-3 . 1
Handy Pantry Stores Inc.
Flower & Medalie, Esgs.
24 E. Main St. , Suite 201
Bayshore, N.Y. 11706
Mr. Sullivan: Handy Pantry stores, assessed for $35,800 and want it
reduced to $11,933 .
May 25,1993
The Board of Assessment Review began reviewing Mr. Paul Henry' s
cases at 9: 30. Present were:
Thomas R. Burdy
William F. English, Jr.
Robert H. Whelan
Francis A. Thorp
John Sullivan
Mr. Henry: I guess my first one would be Ronald Burk. Actually, I
take it back, we didn' t submit an appraisal for Burk, I'm sorry,
Carolyn Buhler.
100) Mr. & Mrs. Carll Buhler
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: We have Carll Buhler.
Mr. Henry: Right, I think Carll is abbreviated for Carolyn.
• 77 •
Mr. Henry: I assume you have a copy of the appraisal there?
Appraised for $190,000. implied value $260,000.
Mr. Sullivan: They are requesting a reduction to $4,150.
Mr. Henry: What we really request is that the assessment be adjusted
to the appraised value of $190,000 using the current R.A.R. of 3. 19.
Mr. Sullivan: Using the what?
Mr. Henry: The appraised value of $190,000 and the current R.A.R. of
3 . 19.
Mr. Scott: 3. 24 is the Adjusted Residential Ratio and we request that
it be consisted with the proof that we submitted from the E.A.
Mr. Henry: Just for the record, I would consider 3.19, 3 .24 close
enough for government work today, so I wouldn' t object to that ratio.
Mr. Sullivan: You say $4,150 equals out to $190,000 based on the
3 . 24.
Mr. Henry: No, I didn' t say that. As all my petitions in the past
and currently, the requested assessed value is just half of the
current assessed value. It's not what we are really requesting, we
just pro-format on the forms. I think we went through this last
year, we can go through it again, or just ignore it. Either way,
what we would ask is the assess of the adjusted using the ratio of
3 . 24 to the $190,000 appraised value.
Mr. Whelan: What does the applied value say?
Mr. Henry: The applied value is what is referred to as the Equalized
Value, it' s a derivation of the ratio and the assessment. In other
words, if you have an assessment and you have a ratio, you can
through the formula derive an equalized value or implied value. In
other words, according to . . .
Mr. Whelan: Well, this is a residential piece of property right?
So you mentioned both of them, which one are you going to use? Which
one are you planning on using?
Mr. Henry: For the sake of this meeting, I am suggesting and
requesting the R.A.R. of 3 . 24, which I 'm willing to use. Valuation
as applied in the appraisal, we feel is accurate would respectfully
request that it be considered and applied to the R.A.R.
Mr. Scott: One thing, Celic Realtors are not licensed N.Y. State
appraiser and the manor in which they give the comps. are such as
a, they throw it out so that you can' t tell whether they are apples
or oranges, or whatever, and so that we would respectfully submit
that we don' t agree with the $190,000 that he offered. We do agree
it does lend some credibility as to what the present assessment
would be, but its some place in the range of between what is stated
• 78 •
here of $195,000 and $256,000, which is the indicated value. We
would agree that there should be some consideration for what it is
reported to be, an appraisal, but not full consideration for that.
He is not a licensed real estate broker. He' s a licensed real estate
broker, but he is not a licensed N.Y. State appraiser.
Mr. English Jr. : He lists himself as a member of some . . .
Mr. Scott: New York State, as of January 1 says that to have
credibility in court, it has to be a licensed N.Y. State appraiser.
Mr. Sullivan: What is the current appraisal?
Mr. Scott: The current appraisal is $190,000 and we' re indicating
with the $8,300 that it' s $256,000, so there is some place in between
there should be a some sort of an area. The method which Mr.
Celiclistedcomps. without comparing them against the subject is
not an accurate way of doing it.
Mr. Sullivan: Go back again, what is the assessed value right now?
Mr. Scott: The assessed value right now is $8,300 and that
represents a value of $256,000 using the 3 . 24. The $190,000 which is
indicated by the appraisal, is $6,156. We' re saying that you have to
regard this at what it is. It' s not a complete appraisal, we' re
saying it does show an indication that the assessment is too high,
but it should be some place in between.
Mr. Sullivan: What are you recommending? Anything?
Mr. Scott: Well, basically I 'd say half way in between.
Mr. Sullivan: O.K. Any other questions from you Mr. Henry?
Mr. Henry: No.
Mr. Sullivan: Next Paul?
Mr. Henry: Joseph Carpenito.
101) 1000-38-5-5
Joseph R. & Joan Carpenito
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Their assessed value is $6,500 and they are requesting
a reduction of $3 ,250.
Mr. Scott: In the interest of brevity, if I could get the agreement
of Mr. Henry, we will not dispute the owners estimate of value which
is $152,822, but we would stipulate that it would be the 3 . 24.
• 79 ,
Mr. Henry: Agreed.
Mr. Sullivan: Let me have that again.
Mr. Scott: The owners estimate of value is $152, 822, and if we use
R.A.R. of 3 .24, it would be $4,951.
Mr. Whelan: Paul, I have a question for you. You stated what you
wanted was half of the assessment, and yet you settle for something
that is no where near it.
Mr. Henry: Let me answer that question. This came up last year and
I will answer it briefly, but it' s a good question and worthy of a
little time. First of all, one of the things that I do when I fill
out the forms, is I have a lot of experience with certain situations,
and I try to protect all possibilites for my clients, having all
their options. One of the things that happens is that since you are
only allowed on the appeal to request a maximum of 25% reduction, if
for some reason the assessment has been lowered or is incorrect, you
can put yourself in the corner, so we always just pro-form them. A
lot of the attorney' s do this as well, request the assessment to be
cut in half.
Mr. Whelan: Then that' s not your target?
Mr. Henry: That' s really just protecting our clients for the actions
that might be in front of them. Always when it comes down to
determining assessments, valuation is suppose to be looked at, and
really what we are asking for is the assessment to be adjusted to the
valuation that we present. Usually that' s what' s considered and
that' s essentially our perspective of getting an assessment through
value. Obviously we could write anything in here we want in terms of
the value, you might note that the property owners estimate of
current full market in each petition is always at least 25% below
what the assessment would imply. Again, just to be consistent with
keeping all those options open.
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman, I just to say there are some
representatives that will come in and give you 10% of value,
Capassois one of them, he does it on a 10% bases, 90% reductions
automatically. Then there are others, like Segull who will do 75%
pro-form them. Paul does it for 50%. So what you see here a lot of
times will mean absolutely nothing.
Mr. Henry: And I 'm the first to agree, I 'd also like to add it
really just keeps our options open. Whatever we settle on and
whatever reductions that I have in my possession, prior to filing
appeals, I 'm not going to file appeals. Last year, I did and I think
I explained myself. I hope that is behinds us, that issue.
Mr. Sullivan: Last year' s is last year' s, as far as I 'm concerned.
Mr. Henry: Thank you.
• 80
Mr. Sullivan: Next.
102) 1000-88-1-12
Louis Carvell
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Presently assessed at $15,400 and looking for a
reduction down to $7,700, and the value is $362,069.
Mr. Henry: Now, I 'd like to just add to the picture that we
submitted an appraisal for $400,000. I 'd like to point out that the
subject property was purchased Dec. 21, 1992 for $400,000. I have a
copy of the closing statement as well if anybody wants to inspect
that as well.
Mr. Whelan: What was the sale price?
Mr. Henry: $400,000.
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman, in the interest of brevity, since the
appraisal and the sale of 12/92 was $400,000 if we can get Mr. Henry
to agree to the $400,000 figure instead of the $360 something which
was specified, we would accept it on the basis of 3 .24 which would
reduce the assessment to $12,960.
Mr. Sullivan: Do you want to agree on the $400,000?
Mr. Henry: Yes sir, I would be pleased to accept that offer.
Mr. Sullivan: Any further question?
103 ) 1000-114-9-14. 2
Robert A. & Deborah Celic
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Henry: I believe an appraisal was included in the grievance.
Mr. Sullivan: Robert Celic, presently assessed at $12,200 and
looking for a reduction of to $6,100.
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman, in the interest of brevity, there is an
appraisal for $310,000 from Stype. $310,000 if we take the point
off of 3 . 24, we would come up to a figure of $10,044. We would
accept that if Mr. Henry would accept that.
Mr. Henry: Happy to accept it. Thank you.
81
104) 1000-100-4-9
Donald & Patricia Deerkoski
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman, in the interest of brevity.
Mr. Sullivan: Let me get this down first please. Currently at
$9,600 and wants a reduction down to $4,800. The reduction on that
is based on 2.48 rather then 3.24, that's on the form.
Mr. Scott: That' s not exactly accurate because what he did was to
take 50% of the assessment period. He didn't use the 2.48.
Mr. Henry: That' s correct, what we do is we still put the E.R. on
the form.
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman, in the interest of brevity, there was an
appraisal of $235,000. It was done by Patricia A. Castoidi who
stipulates right here that this appraisal is made for mortgage
purposes only, and if you remember what we talked about early, this
particular appraiser has told us there is a range of value and the
range of value is not always the same for somebody that' s having an
appraisal for themselves as for a bank, and we talked about agreeing
here about a 10% value change for a mortgage purpose only mortgage.
So if we are taking the $235,000 times 1.1 which is 10%, that would
be $258 ,500 times .0324 which is the Residential Assessment Ratio,
the Assessors would agree to $8,375 as an assessment as compared to
the $9,600 that' s on there presently.
Mr. Henry: Can I just ask, I just want to understand what you are
saying. So you're suggesting the appraisal be adjusted 10% upwards
to account for the fact mortgage purposes, and certainly there is a
variance. This is not an exact science and I concur. Just for fun,
before I say I 'm prepared to accept that, if the Grievance Board
agrees, I think it is fair, however, I would say that in a lot of
cases I find that mortgages, due to the fact of the competitiveness
of the mortgage market today, a lot of these mortgages, mortgages
appraisals are prepared specifically by mortgage companies that ask
the guys to lean up. So I would agree with you in terms of a
variance, but I wouldn' t necessarily agree with you that there is a
chiseled upwards adjustment. I 'm prepared to accept the offer anyway.
Mr. Scott: O.K. Mr. Chairman, in regards to that particular
statement, when he said I agree with him that you can't do anything
chiseled in stone, what we are talking about a lot of times is the
banks are very conservative in nature when they're refinancing, and
what they are saying now is that they want to make sure that whatever
is the amount of money they give out in a bank, it is something that
they can get back quickly, with what they call a quick sale. A sale
that if they had to take the property back within 60 days. This
particular appraiser has told us that she does not want her
appraisals used for this particular purpose, grievance.
82 411
Mr. Whelan: Who was that?
Mr. Scott: Pat Castoldi, she is the best appraiser that there is
that I 've seen so far.
Mr. Sullivan: She's not local and why is she telling you that she
doesn't want her appraisals used?
Mr. Scott: Because she comes in everyday to get the comps.
Mr. Sullivan: Did she tell him?
Mr. Scott: She told us that she didn't want it used for appraisal
only for grievance purposes because she wanted it understood that
this for mortgages only. It' s for the bank, she did the appraisal
for the bank.
Mr. Sullivan: Who paid her to do the appraisal?
Mr. Scott: The bank commissioned her to do the appraisal and it was
paid for by the people applying for a mortgage. There' s a difference.
Mr. Henry: I agree with Bob to a certain extent, but I would be
interested to know what you would do with this appraisal in the
context of a Grievance Board.
Mr. Scott: What I 'm saying is that she is saying there is a range of
values when you do it, and when you go for a mortgage and she' s asked
by the bank to do an evaluation, they're looking at a specific range
of value as compared to what a market value would be for a person
when they are selling it. All she is saying is that she doesn' t want
it specifically used without making sure that it is known that ahead
of time and it is done for a specific purpose which is not a standard
market value appraisal that she is doing for a regular person.
Mr. Whelan: Does she have an estimate of a multiplier to bring it
to current market?
Mr. Scott: The reason why I 'm giving you the 10% is it was her
idea. She' ll come in and talk to you about it.
Mr. Sullivan: I understand it but I want to hear it from her or
somebody else. We are talking about somebody that is applying for
this, and they are using an appraisal from a bank, and the one that
did the appraisal now says she doesn' t want it used for this.
Mr. Scott: She does not want it to be used for this particular
purposes.
Mr. Thorp: For all intensive purposes, we don' t have an appraisal on
this piece of property.
Mr. Scott: We have an appraisal which is a conservative, value
appraisal. We are just saying by adding the 10%, which Mr. Henry
83111
agrees to, we're getting a value of $8,375 which is a considerable
reduction from the assessment that' s on there right now, $9,600.
Mr. Sullivan: I agree with that Bob. What I 'm seeing here is that
we are getting this second and third hand. You are saying that she
said, that it should not be, for that purpose.
Mr. Scott: Regardless of what she said, I 'm telling you. I 'm saying
that if you take a look at it from the purpose of what it says right
here, "This appraisal is made for mortgage purposes only. "
It' s not a market value on the house. Regardless of who said what or
whatever, you can see that this is a lower range of value.
Mr. Sullivan: I agree with you, Bob. The thing I don't see is
bringing somebody else into this. Do you want to strike that portion
of it.
Mr. Scott: Strike that portion. What we are saying now for
Mr.Deerkoski is that we would recommend $8,375.
Mr. Henry: I would readily accept that offer and consider it fair.
I would just like to comment that I agree in concept with everything
that Bob is saying. I would like to comment on the clause in the
appraisal because it is a very common one. I see that clause in many
appraisals that I deal with and I 've talked to many appraisers about
it. They are not specifically throwing that clause in normally to
prevent the appraisal from being used for this purpose. What they
are specifically doing is protecting themselves from having to go to
court. That is the reason why that clause appears in the appraisal.
What Bob says is true, but I just want to differentiate that clause
that is written in the appraisal.
Mr. Sullivan: Give me that appraisal again.
Mr. Scott: $8,375.
Mr. Whelan: Bob would agree to $8,375 and Paul concurs. We have
to set a precedence there with this. If that appraiser is
specifically stating this appraisal should not be used for anything
but a mortgage, can we consider that application without proof?
Mr. Scott: No, just as a lower range of value. If you adjust it
slightly, it' s O.K.
Mr. Whelan: I don't have a problem with that, it will expedite
things. Where it' s the first one, and we're going to get a lot of
them.
Mr. Scott: Can I make a suggestion, Mr. Chairman? There is going to
be a lot of refinance mortgages both now and as long as the rates are
down. This is some indication of value which is greater then we're
going to get in some cases when we have people coming in. I would
say that since it is an indication of value, and if we take a
percentage, which would make it into the middle range of values, it
84 411
would be something that we should accept and we should consider when
we are going at a range of values. And if it gives the Assessor and
the Board of Assessment Review an opportunity to say the assessment
we've got on there, which in this past case is $9,600, and that
represented $296,000 and we realize that' s not what the market is
today and that $246,000 or $256,000 is more in line with what the
assessment should of the market value of what the house is, then I
think you should go ahead and use it. It' s fairer to everybody.
Mr. Sullivan: Comments by the Board? 105
105) 1000-145-2-7
Joseph & Eileen Farrell
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Before we get into this one, Bob and Paul can I have a
minute with the Board?
Mr. Scott: While we're talking about Freedom of Information Act, as
long as you are a member of the Board, if you request the cards that
are used for comps. or something like that, we would bring them to
you such as copies of these here. Anybody else that's in the public
that asks for cards, we would give them the card if they are the
owner of the property, the taxpayer, or they are the duly represented
agents for that particular piece of property. Everybody else has to
file a Freedom of Information Act, and then we charge them.
Mr. English Jr. : In other words, if I wanted to get a copy of your
card, I could get it.
Mr. Scott: If you' re doing it on the bases of the Board of
Assessment Review. . . .
Mr. English Jr. : No, as an individual.
Mr. Scott: As an individual, then you would have to file a Freedom
of Information Act and we would charge you. Once they are public
record, and they are submitted, they are available for anybody to
look at. If they want copies of them, then we have charge them.
Mr. Sullivan: Paul, what we want to stipulate, as we did last year,
I know you' re talking between these two in the interest of brevity,
and we will agree to this, if you will agree to this etc. however, it
is still under review by the Board, the same as we agreed to last
year.
Mr. Henry: Totally understood. Although it sounds like we are
settling these cases, we are really just leaving them in your hands
and both agreeing to recommend the same thing.
85 •
Mr. Sullivan: I wanted to bring it up for the new members that we
didn' t have last year.
Mr. Whelan: We' re assuming a tentative agreement on the table.
Mr. Henry: I would even stipulate that all these numbers that I
concur on will defiantly result in no appeals file. The only thing
last year was the timing and I would ask that we get the results a
week or two before the appeal date so I can adjust my files.
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman, the reason why last year was so late was
because of the fact that there was a lot more activity in this
particular Board of Assessment Review. The typing took so long, that
by the time it was filed, there wasn' t any time left.
Mr. Henry: I understand that, I 'm not pointing fingers in times of
the frame, I 'm just explaining my actions as a result of it.
Mr. Sullivan: It's my understanding the notices were sent out on
time.
Mr. Henry: They' re on time terms of your time frame, the problem is
that I 'm competing for index numbers with the rest of the world and
I 'm sure Bob will substantiate this, but there are still people going
to court for those 1992 cases from last year. Fortunately, all mine
are finished because I filed them first.
Mr. Sullivan: Mr. Joseph Farrell has an assessed value of $14,700
and they are asking for $7,350 reduction. Value of the property is
$345,611.
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman, in the interest. The appraisal by Mr.
Stype states that the value to be $390,000. The Assessors will
agree to that as a value, $12,636. Mr. Chairman we would agree to it
if Mr. Henry would agree to it.
Mr. Henry: Happy to leave that recommendation with the Board.
106) 1000-74-1-37. 2
Robert & Marilyn
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $7,600 and wants it reduced to
$3,800.
Mr. Henry: This one is almost perfect as far as the request and the
appraised value indication. Bob, are you familiar with this piece of
property?
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman, in the interest again of brevity, there is
an appraisal for $140,000 and there is also a recent sale of 8/91 for
86 .
•
$140,000. The assessors stipulate $4,536 as an assessment to be
reduced to.
Mr. Sullivan: O.K. I got the appraisal of $140,000. Mr. Henry?
Mr. Henry: Yes sir, that would be fine.
Mr. Sullivan: Next.
107) 1000-30-2-7
Herbert & Joan Johnson
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $6,800 and looking for $3 ,400
reduction.
Mr. Henry: An appraisal was submitted for $162,000 and that was
equalized to $5,250 from the appraised $162,000
Mr. Whelan: Who did the appraisal?
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman, the Assessors, the only stipulation that we
make is that we want you to point out that this is made for mortgage
purposes only and that we would recommend that the assessment be
changed not to $5,250 but to $5,774. The reason why it is so late is
because the copy we have is so poor we couldn't tell what the numbers
are.
Mr. Sullivan: $5,774 based on what?
Mr. Scott: Based on the adjustment factor for the lower end of value.
Mr. Henry: So you are adjusting 10%, I don't have a problem with
that.
108) 1000-41-1-26
Claude & Susan Kumjian
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $4,300.
Mr. Henry: His home was purchased 4/21/92 for $100,000 and we have
an appraisal for $107,000.
Mr. Scott: In the interest of brevity sir, the thing that takes
precedence more then anything else is the actual sale. We consider
that to be the value and it is a most recent sale, it is April of
- S 87 .
1992 . $100,000 is the purchase price, the Assessors would agree to
$3,240.
Mr. Sullivan: Reduced from $4, 300 to $3,240.
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman, also in the interest of future statements,
there are some cases that we feel that we will not concur in the
future on recorded sale prices because we either have knowledge or we
speculate that there has been an unrecorded portion of the property
under the table, and we will not always go by what the sale price is.
Mr. Sullivan: You will state that at that time?
Mr. Scott: At that time, and it will be speculation on our part only
because it can't be verified unless we have, one the party is
agreeing to tell us that it is, and they are not going to do that.
It would be violating the law.
Mr. English Jr. : How can they get away with something like that?
Mr. Scott: As a former real estate broker, I 've had three people in
the last two days tell of sales that they've got coming up where they
got $50,000, and $110,000 under the table and if we've got the
property assessed at $525,000, they are going to purchase it for
$525,000 but they are going to have $160,000 cash under the table.
Then they are going to come in and grieve on the bases of the $360
some thousand dollars. They already told me this as of two nights
ago.
Mr. Sullivan: Why would they say something?
Mr. Scott: This is a broker who is telling me this. He's telling me
that there are clients who are planning to do this in the future
after they purchase for $365,000.
Mr. Henry: I can tell you first hand it is a very common situation.
Mr. Scott: I 'm just telling you that some sales prices we will
stipulate to, then there are others in the future we won't.
Mr. Henry: I will say in my experience, generally the Assessors have
done a fair and accurate indicator. Certainly some sales prices are
not reflective of the market value. And I have found where I have
Assessors swearing up and down that every sale I present is not an
arms length sale. In Southold it' s the other extreme, they are very
fair and honest, I generally go on their word because they sometimes
have more information then I do. This is very well respected. I
concur with the recommendation of the Board.
109) 1000-15-2-4
Yvonne Lodes
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
88410
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $7,400. Mr. Henry, any comments.
Mr. Henry: Yes sir, I 'm just looking through the file, I don' t think
there is a recent sale on this.
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman, in the interest of brevity there was a
recent divorce and there was an $80,000 cash settlement with a
mortgage of $90,000 taken over by Yvonne. We submit that the value
of $170,000 is more accurate, and $6,508 is what the Assessors would
recommend.
Mr. Henry: Absolutely.
110) 1000-121-4-26
Joan & Lowell Ryan
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P. O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: He has an assessment of $11,700, and they have it
appraised here at $300,000.
Mr. Henry: If anybody cares, I have the original appraisal with
pictures.
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman, in the interest of brevity, there is a
recent sale, 11/91. It was $320,000, taking the R.A.R. , it would be
$10,368. The Assessors will agree to that.
Mr. Sullivan: Questions?
Mr. English Jr. : How much wasthe sale again Bob?
Mr. Scott: $320,000 on 11/91.
Mr. Henry: I would just point out that the appraisal is prepared in
1993 . I would be happy to concur that recommendation to the Board.
Mr. Sullivan: Next Paul.
111) 1000-70-10-13
Thomas A & Christine E. Schade
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Henry: I would like to point out that the subject was purchased
for $140,000 9/91. I have an appraisal for $145,000 prepared in
1993 . We would stipulate that the appraisal is probably a fairer
representation of the current market value.
Mr. Scott: $4,698 Paul?
•
89
Mr. Henry: Yes.
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman we would agree with that stipulation.
Mr. Sullivan: What is that?
Mr. Scott: $4,700 taking a $145,000.
Mr. Sullivan: Agreed?
Mr. Henry: Yes sir. Thank you.
112) 1000-62-3-34
Roy A. & Joanne Schelin
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Henry: I just have the appraisal for $185,000. The comps.
using the appraisal, I have some pictures and surveys if you care to
view them.
Mr. Scott: There is a problem with the appraisal we don' t agree with
it. You don't hear me say that too often.
Mr. Sullivan: What' s wrong with the appraisal?
Mr. Henry: How far off is it?
Mr. Burdy: Is it a licensed appraisal?
Mr. Scott: Yes it is.
Mr. Sullivan: Who is the appraiser?
Mr. Scott: Ira Mizrach.
Mr. Burdy: Bank?
Mr. Scott: No, this is specifically for this purpose, a market value
approach.
Mr. Henry: I 'm not sure if that' s true Bob. It was appraised way
before I was in contract with him.
Mr. Scott: This is for Peconic Bay Funding, which is why I couldn't
quite accept it. The figures that we received did not make a whole
lot of sense. If we went on the same basis as we have in the past
for people that have been going on a refinance type program approach
to it, if we accepted the $185,000 as a refinance appraisal and
multiplied 10% and then multiplying it by the R.A.R. , it would come
out to be $6,593. The Assessors at that point would not be adverse
to a change.
y • 90111
Mr. Henry: I have no problem with that.
Mr. Sullivan: $6,600.
Mr. Scott: The thing is the $185,000, and we didn't know it was for
a refinance, we thought was too low.
Mr. Henry: One of the things you learn at least through my
perspective is that there is never bad times. That's why the sales
are so good.
113) 1000-111-4-8
Peter F. & Patricia Schleipman
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed for $12,300 and appraised for $320,000.
Mr. Scott: This is an Andy Stype appraisal for market value. I
don' t see anything saying this is for refinancing purposes.
Mr. English Jr. : What does a bank appraisal usually cost?
Mr. Scott: Most of the refinance appraisals that the bank charges,
they're usually in the range of $250. It depends on the form of the
appraisal that you are asking for, it could be anywhere from $250 to
$450. If you are asking for a letter of opinion, it could be $100 to
$150 but it doesn't mean anything.
Mr. Henry: Letters of opinion seem to not hold any water anywhere.
Mr. Sullivan: Paul, are you finished?
Mr. Scott: In the interest of brevity, $320,000 we can except the
value, by the 3 .24 it comes out to be $10,368.
Mr. Henry: That would be very acceptable.
114) 1000-108-3-13. 10
Brian & Barbara Sheehan
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Henry: Did you get a copy of the appraisal?
Mr. Scott: We have a letter of opinion only from Stype.
Mr. Henry: I thought it had two letters of opinion and the house
listed for $233 ,000 on the market right now. I have a letter of
opinion from Andy Stype and a letter of opinion from Bookmiller
• 91
Real Estate, and of course these have to be weighted not as an
appraisal but certainly we would ask them to be considered. In
addition the property is on the market for $233 ,000, it' s currently
listed.
Mr. Sullivan: What is Stype' s opinion?
Mr. Henry: Bookmiller' s opinion is $219,000 and Stype's is
$220,000
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman, you really can't accept a letter of
opinion. I can however accept an asking price if you have a copy of
the listing Paul and that shows that is has been on the market for a
period of time, but I can not accept any reduction from that asking
price. So in other words what I am saying is that $233,000 becomes
the basis because it is possible that somebody can come up and pay
full price of the asking price of $233,000. They are not going to
pay more then what they are asking. Any determinate of value below
that, would have to be if they did sell it for considerably less then
next year those people that purchased could come back to this
particular again or to the Assessors at that point and say can you
make a change based on the actual sale. The Assessors Office would
go along with a change on the basis of $233,000 times .0324 which
would make it $7,550.
Mr. Henry: I have no problems with that. That would be reasonable
and acceptable.
Mr. Whelan: We have no documentation as listed?
Mr. Scott: The only thing is if he has the proof.
Mr. Henry: I could provide that by tomorrow.
Mr. Sullivan: Bob, run that by me again.
Mr. Scott: Basically, we can't accept an opinion of value. If they
can establish that the house has been listed and they have listing
forms which show that it' s been on the market for $233,000, that' s
stating what they feel is the ultimate market. We would accept it as
a change.
Mr. Henry: Would the Board permit me to supply to them by tomorrow a
copy of the listing?
Board: Yes.
Mr. Scott: He did bring in additional information in this particular
case, so that would be supporting evidence to the evidence he already
submitted to us. If it is more then $233,000, I would do it on the
basis of whatever the asking price is times . 0234.
Mr. Sullivan: Next Paul.
• 92410
115) 1000-74-2-34
John & Margaret Skabry
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $7,000, an appraisal of
$165,000. Anything else Paul?
Mr. Henry: No.
Mr. Sullivan: The appraisal date is 2/01/93 for mortgage purposes.
Paul, anything to add?
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman, the Assessors accept the $165,000 as a
basic range of value on the lower end but then we submit that it
should be increased by 10% because of the fact that it is a mortgage
appraisal and so we' re saying that it should be in the range of
$5,880.
Mr. Henry: What are you saying Bob?
Mr. Scott: I 'm saying it's $165,000 and if we add the 10% it would
be $5,881.
Mr. Henry: I can live with that, but I still don' t buy the flat 10%,
but I can live with that.
Mr. Scott: When you see the reduction down from $7,000.
Mr. Sullivan: Next.
116) 1000-78-2-42
Joseph J.Jr. & Doris Verwayen
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Presently assessed at $10,400, and an appraisal at
$291,000.
Mr. Henry: I have a copy of the appraisal if you want to look at it,
I thought is was included.
Mr. Sullivan: There' s the appraisers opinion, but I didn' t get any
thing else.
Mr. Henry: Maybe you didn' t get the whole thing.
Mr. Scott: We only have one sheet Paul.
93110
Mr. Henry: This appraisal was prepared by the way, I guess the
original owner had died, Mrs. Doris died in 1991. So the appraisal
was prepared to settle the estate.
Mr. Sullivan: Make copies of the appraisal.
Mr. Scott: The contention of the Board of Assessors that $10,400
which is presently on the assessment roll represents the value of
$321,000. The appraisal from 1991 shows that here' s an estimated
value of $291,000. This is an estate appraisal which is usually on
the conservative side for tax purposes and we submit that there
should be no change.
Mr. Sullivan: Do you down that much on an estate?
Mr. Scott: It' s on the realm of where it should be and it' s two
years old as far as this appraisal is concerned. He has a list of
comps. but he hasn't done a direct sales comparison approach to
it. I can't say that he was a licensed appraiser because at that
point you didn't need to be in 1991. We feel that the 10% change is
not sufficient by a 1991 appraisal to warrant a change at this point.
Mr. English Jr. : Just a quick question, are you a licensed appraiser?
Mr. Scott: I use to be a licensed real estate broker. I am a
licensed real estate broker who is not functioning. I will not do it
while I 'm in office.
Mr. Sullivan: Paul, they are not agreeing with you, do you have
anything you would like to add?
Mr. Henry: Not to that case sir.
117) 1000-112-1-16. 5
Joseph A. Wanat
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Appraised at $12,600.
Mr. Henry: This appraisal is for $120,000. There must be something
wrong here.
Mr. Scott: To the Board, it' s 2. 8 acres, a house that has 1920 some
odd square feet in it, there is no proof submitted to the Board.
Mr. Henry: I have an appraisal here, I 'm just trying to, I respect
what you are saying, just help me out for a second. Is this the
right piece of property? •
• 94 •
Mr. Scott: Paul, can I just make a suggestion? There was one that
was split out, I don't know if you got the property card. Mr.
Sullivan: Reduced from $4,300 to $3,240.
Mr. Henry: I concur with the recommendation of the Board.
Mr. Scott: He may be saying this, that this 2. 81 acre piece and the
1900 square foot house is worth $120,000, but I don't think so.
Mr. Henry: Yes, this is the same property. May I present this
appraisal? I think this property was subdivided recently, what
happened was I guess he broke this homestead into two and a quarter.
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman, in the interest of brevity Mr. Tucchia is
not a licensed appraiser. This is an opinion of value only and we
request that you not consider it. He's a licensed real estate broker
but not a licensed appraiser for N.Y. State.
Mr. Henry: Hold on for one minute because there might be more then
one appraisal.
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman, on the application it shows that the
assessment roll says that it has $12,600. The assessment on this
particular property is $9,200, is has been since Jan. 5, 1993 .
Mr. Henry: Well that explains the gap there. So I guess $12,600 is
probably the original assessment.
Mr. Sullivan: Change that on the application.
Mr. Whelan: So what are you requesting here Paul, on this
application now?
Mr. Henry: $9,200 is the current assessment and my request was
$6,300 I 'm sure. This is a good example of why I preform them. I
would ask that the assessment be reduced to the minimum value of
$6,300 and we would have to live with that because we could appeal
that even if we wanted to.
Mr. Sullivan: $9,200 and you' re looking for $6,300? Any comments by
the Assessors?
Mr. Scott: Even with the so called appraisal, I would live with
$194,000 which is the $6,300 so I would accept that.
Mr. Henry: I would too, technically I 'm limited to my request of
$6, 300, so I would live with that this year.
Mr. Sullivan: You're saying $6,300 at 3.24 equals $194,444.
Mr. Henry: Can I get that appraisal back?
Mr. Whelan: So the only justification we have on this one is an
opinion of value by Tucchio at $120,000.
95 •
Mr. Scott: Basically it' s a mistake on Mr. Henry' s part that we will
go along with his opinion of value because that is well in excess of
any letter of opinion of anything else which we don't think proves a
point, but we don't think $194,000 is the value either.
Mr. Whelan: What is your opinion of value?
Mr. Scott: I 'm not saying what my opinion of value is. All I am
saying is we will accept the amount that he is asking which
represents the value of $194,000. Next year he will probably come
back with another one, and then we will have to come up with an
opinion of value based on what his complaint is at that point.
Mr. Whelan: Then you are agreeing that the $9,200 assessment at
this point is not right?
Mr. Scott: We will stipulate that the $9,200 is better.
118) 1000-126-8-15
Constance Zahra
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Constance Zahra assessed at $6,400. Paul, anything?
Mr. Henry: I do have two work ups one by Stype. I 'd like to point
out that Andy Stypes work ups are really appraisals, although it' s
referred to as a letter of opinion it is an appraisal like work up.
Then I do have another work up by Bookmiller also concurring with
that $16,000-$170,000. I also have pictures of the subject property.
Mr. Sullivan: Assessors?
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman, Mr. Stype_ is a N.Y. State licensed
appraiser, but what we have in evidence only is one page that says
its a letter and we do not feel that is a qualified method.
Mr. Sullivan: O.K. , letter of opinion.
Mr. Scott: I don' t care how many pages it is, it' s a letter of
opinion. The difference between the $6,400 which represents the
value of $197,530 and Mr. Stype' s opinion of value which is
$170,000 is relatively close with no substantial effort to prove
otherwise. We would request based on the proof submitted to have no
change by this particular Board.
Mr. Henry: May I point out that the appraisal was prepared in 1990.
Mr. Scott: The letter of opinion that I received in evidence was for
$170,000 from Stype.
Mr. Henry: What' s the date on that Bob?
, • 96411
Mr. Scott: April 1990.
Mr. Henry: Now here is the update to that. I have the full
appraisal if you want to look at it.
119) 1000-106-10-28. 5
Frank Zaleski
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Scott: On this particular case, I think that the appraisal was
on the conservative side for a house that we consider to be in the
range of almost 2,600 square feet. Even taking the appraisers
figures of 2463, because he uses interior measurements and we use
exterior measurements, comparable #k2 shows that a house that' s 2,100
square feet shows a value of $269,529 and that has approximately 360
some odd square feet less then the subject. We feel that $250,000 is
conservative and we would offer that $275,000 value would probably be
more in keeping. We'd say $8,900, and that would be our
recommendation to the Board.
Mr. Sullivan: O.K. , give me that figure that you are saying.
Mr. Scott: We feel that the appraisal, we want it to be in the range
of $275,000. We feel it is more in keeping with the type of house it
is. We feel that the appraisal is on a conservative side, its not
for refinance purposes in this particular case, We' re saying that if
you take the $275,000 times .0324 it brings it into the range of
$8,900. That' s our recommendation to the Board.
Mr. Henry: I concur with your recommendation to the Board.
Mr. Sullivan: Any questions?
120) 1000-78-4-32.5
Mr. & Mrs. Bret Kehl
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Whelan: How many more do you have Paul?
Mr. Henry: This is the last one of the group that we are reviewing
with appraisals. I just wanted to, with your permission, leave some
other sheets with you for some of the other cases, and you can decide
what you want to do with them. This is the last appraisal we are
going to go through.
Mr. Henry: Assessed at $10,100.
e • 97 .
Mr. Sullivan: Wait a minute, are you saying it' s assessed at $10,100
because the card is saying $9,000?
Mr. Henry: Actually, it was increased.
Mr. Sullivan: Property record card shows $9,000 as of 4/5/93 .
Mrs. Duffy: We made a correction.
Mr. Scott: We made a correction of errors previous to your coming
in. We've already submitted it to them for $9,000 and Mr. Kehl
agreed to that.
Mr. Henry: You spoke to him?
Mr. Scott: Yes.
Mr. Henry: O.K. , I don' t have a problem with that, let me just see
where we stand.
Mr. Scott: We had raised it based on the assumption he had finished
the upstairs. He came in and proofed to us that he hadn't. He was
willing to have us go there and take a look and show us that it was
unfinished. We had raised it to $10,100 from last years, he proved
to us he hadn' t finished the upstairs so we gave him a correction of
errors which we submitted to the Board and he agreed to that change.
Mr. Henry: When did you speak to him?
Mr. Scott: On 4/5/93, I 'm sorry that was May 5, .
Mr. Sullivan: This was done 4/5/93?
Mr. Scott: That' s a mistake it should be 5/5/93 because we wouldn't
make any correction of errors, we could do it ourselves before that,
it has to be May 5, . He may be applying for a reduction again.
Mr. Henry: I would ask that we consider the $247,000. In my files I
just have the notice of increase of assessed value.
Mr. Scott: It shows a value of $277,777 and on the appraisal it
shows that there is only 1,152 square feet in the house. The 1,368
square feet we've got on the cards we got 1,152 square feet of
finished first, plus 216 square feet of finished first floor, plus
1,152 feet of second floor, plus he has 768 feet of an apartment over
the garage. I think that the appraisal is totally in error and that
the difference between $247,000 and $277,000 which is what we are
appraising it at, I think there should be absolutely no change from
the $9,000. I think the Board of Assessors and the Board of
Assessment Review would be totally right to keep it at the $9,000.
Mr. Whelan: Is that a licensed appraisal?
• 98 •
Mr. Scott: That' s done by Patricia Castadi, but she' s got down
here, unfinished 1,152 square feet and she is not really taking that
into consideration. That' s a major building plus he has an apartment
over the garage which she is not considering. Maybe he didn' t show
it to her.
Mr. Whelan: And what was her appraisal at?
Mr. Scott: $247,000 and we have it at $277,777 and I think that is
just about right on the money. The Kehl' s were living in the
apartment while they were finishing the main section of the house
which is a, as you can see 1,152 square feet plus 216 square feet.
So there is 2, 525 potential square feet in the main area and then
they have 768 square feet additional to that. 3,288 square feet and
it' s a massive house. This is on Main Bay View, it' s a big blue
contemporary that they are doing. As you can see Paul, by the
assessment card, we have been working with Mr. Kehl consistently as
he completes it, we would put a completion on there, and we think we
have been more then fair with Mr. Kehl. We have been taking his
word as to the finished portion of it consistently.
Mr. Henry: Let me talk to him about this.
Mr. Whelan: Is that it Paul?
Mr. Henry: That's it for those cases. Now, if the Board permits, I
like to just leave them with some pages and pictures and work-ups of
some of my commercial grievances, or should I say specifically cases
that are not eligible for the Small Claims review. Particularly a
couple of cases in here, Jimmy Sage' property by the marina there.
The family is getting the property back on foreclosure on Thursday
and they have been taxes and are probably going to loose the property
because of taxes so I would ask that that be considered.
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman, before he goes on. We can't make an
assumption that they are going to get the property back, other thing
is that if he is going to present anything like this, the Assessors
would ask that we be able to reply to each and every instance and I
don't think that leaving material with the Board of Review at this
point is proper because it wasn't stipulated before hand. The
ability to pay or not to pay taxes is not something that the Board of
Assessment Review or the Board of Assessors should take into
consideration.
Mr. Henry: I didn' t mean to imply that the issue is their ability to
pay, what I was getting at was they would be very lucky to be able to
sell the property for a couple of years taxes. Because the taxes are
so high nobody is going to buy it. It's up to the Board to decide,
may I leave it with them?
Mr. Scott: Mr. Chairman, can we go outside and let the Board discuss
this themselves?
99 •
Mr. Sullivan: Yes, Paul based on our conversation of last Tuesday,
the Board has decided not to add these to the record at this time.
Mr. Henry: Then I ' ll just close by saying that the Board has another
month of deliberations and if they do decide to perhaps just accept
the very simple hand outs that I asked to present today, please let
me know. In other words, if you change your mind, you got my number.
Mr. Sullivan: O.K. yes, we can do that at any time. Thank you sir.
Mr. Henry: I appreciate your time and the only thing I can think of
is I 'm going to have to change my promotional material next year to
strike out rubber stamping nonsense because it certainly isn' t true
in this town. Thank you.
Mr. Sullivan: Paul, you said that last year.
Mr. Henry: To tell you the truth, last year I wasn't really paying
attention, but this year I 'm going to.
Mr. Scott: Basically I think that anyone that he thought he could
prove at this particular point, he did. Basically, any one that he
didn' t submit then I 'm afraid you' re going to say that there is
insufficient proof and just deny them.
Mr. Whelan: Basically, we will have to go through that formality.
Mr. Scott: To be quite honest, there are a couple of more that I
would have brought up, because I went through them all. He didn't.
Those are the ones he thought he had sufficient proof for. I would
go on the bases that the others he didn' t have sufficient proof to
argue at this point and it's up to you. You can do whatever you want
to. He' s expecting to go to Small Claims with the rest of them,
otherwise he would have been proving them right now.
Mr. Sullivan: And we would have been here for the rest of the week.
Mr. Scott: I hope because of what you just did, denying him the
ability to bring more in, that next year if he' s going to do it,
he' ll have more finished ahead of time so we can get rid of a lot
more next year right here. If there is a lot.
Mr. Thorp: Correct, but his argument last week was that most of his
applications come in two weeks prior.
Board: That' s not our problem.
Mr. Thorp: I know, but I think we are going to be in the same
position.
Mr. Whelan: So at this point you don't think it is necessary to
review the remainder of them?
Mr. Scott: I think he qualified them.
1 , 1 . ` 111 100
Mr. Sullivan: It' s not that he qualified them, he just doesn' t have
the proof here. Decision Day we can look at these, and if there is
no proof, then there is no proof. Thank you Assessors.
Mr. Scott: The only thing we request is that you let us know when
you are going to be here so that if you do want us to come in for any
particular reason, we' ll make sure that at least one of us is
available.
Mr. Sullivan: You mean you're not in the office at all times?
Mrs. Duffy: We go out to look at everything.
Mr. Thorp: These are all Paul Henry with no supporting information.
Mr. Sullivan: Do we have the decision forms?
Mr. Thorp: We' ll make out one of these for each one that we go
through.
Mr. Sullivan: This is Decision Day, oh we're still. . .
Mr. Thorp: Well, I think what we are trying to do John, is combine
review and decision at the same time. There is no sense reviewing
this and saying well there' s no proof.
Mr. Sullivan: O.K.
121) 1000-31-3-11. 15
Michael & Pamela Acebo
Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: They are currently assessed at $6,500 and want a
reduction to $3 , 250, insufficient.
122) 1000-113-14-8
William & Arleen Amato
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $7,200 and looking for a reduction to
$3 ,600, insufficient.
123 ) 1000-51-3-14
Nick & Anna Andriotis
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
. i 101 •
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $9,200 and looking for a
reduction to $4,600. In 1988 it was reduced by the Grievance Board
to $7,000, in 1990 it was increased to $9,000.
Mr. Thorp: John have they submitted anything?
Mr. Sullivan: No, insufficient.
124) 1000-37-7-9.1
Thomas J. Aprea Jr. (as trustee)
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Presently assessed at $26,500, insufficient.
Mr. English Jr. : Currently assessed at what?
125) 1000-125-1-2. 12
George Aydinian
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $7,245 and wants a reduction to
half, $3,623, insufficient.
126) 1000-70-12-32
John & Linda Bertani
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $14,300 and looking for $7,150,
insufficient.
127) 1000-31-3-1
Mr. & Mrs. Peter Brountzas
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Stars Road, East Marion, currently assessed at $7,500,
insufficient.
128) 1000-103-8-1
Edward & Helen Brush
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
• 102 •
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Presently assessed at $9,500 and looking for a
reduction to $4,750, insufficient.
129) 1000-54-9-6
Mr. & Mrs. Ronald Burk
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Presently assessed at $7, 500 and looking for $3,700,
insufficient.
130) 1000-36-2-23 .4
Richard & Mary Butler
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $14,300 and wants a reduction to
$7,150, insufficient.
131) 1000-115-15-22
Jack J. & Elisa Cecchini
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $5,600 and looking for a reduction to
$2,800, insufficient.
132) 1000-115-16-16
Nicholas F. Hilda
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $6,500 and looking for a
reduction to $3 ,250, insufficient.
133 ) 1000-53-4-45. 1
Charles & Caroline
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $10,500 and looking for a
reduction to $5,250, insufficient.
103 •
134) 1000-37-1-5
George W. & Evelyn Clark
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $7,800 and looking for a reduction to
$3,900.
135) 1000-70-13-20. 4
Joseph M. Cornacchia
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $34,300 and looking for a reduction
$17,150.
136) 1000-70-13-20. 5
Joseph M. & Vivian Cornacchia
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $12,500 and looking for a reduction to
$6,250.
137) 1000-56-5-26
Mr. & Mrs. C. Clifford Cornell
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $102,00 and wants a reduction to $5,100.
138) 1000-115-5-18
Robert & Barbara Constanzo
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $11,800 and looking for a
reduction to $5,900.
139) 1000-75-2-18
Leopold & CelciaD'Mello
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
104411
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,700 and looking for a
reduction to $2,850.
140) 1000-33-3-11
Paul H. & Mary S. Dalecki
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $9,500 and looking to be reduced to $4,750.
141) 1000-7-2-1
Robert W. & Linda Daniel Jr.
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $14,600 and wants it reduced to
$7,300.
142) 1001-2-1-19. 1
George Dobler
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $5,600 and looking for a reduction to
$2,800.
143 ) 1000-30-2-57
Deonisios Drakatos
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $9,200 and looking for a reduction to
$4,600.
144) 1000-31-4-7
Athanasios & Stella Drenis
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $7,400 and looking for a
reduction to $3,700.
105 i
145) 1000-84-1-6. 3
Richard E. & Virginia A. Dries
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,700 and looking for a
reduction to $2,850.
146) 1000-55-6-15.49
Steven Dunne
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $6,900 and wants a reduction to
$3,450.
Mr. Thorp: This is off of Boisy Avenue, part of High Point Meadows
that Mendal built.
Mr. Sullivan: This might be another one, it was constructed in Oct.
of 1992 .
147) 1000-22-1-8
Donald & Peggylee Dzenkowski
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $7,800 and looking for a reduction to
$3 ,900.
148) 1000-9-9-16
John C. Evans
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $27,300 and looking for a
reduction to $13,650.
149) 1001-2-2-16
James Anthony Farley
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $3,700 and looking for a
reduction to $1,850.
106411
150) 1000-33-1-18
Mr. Mrs. Antonios Feggoudakis
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed for $8,000 and looking for a
reduction to $4,000.
151) 1001-4-1-13
Frank Field
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $6,800 and looking for a
reduction to $3 ,400.
152) 1000-41-2-13. 2
Frank Field
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $6,700 and asking it to be
reduced to $3 ,350.
153 ) 1000-48-3-20.1
Frank Field
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $11,300 and looking for a reduction to
$5,650.
154) 1000-33-4-21
George Figetakas
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $8,000 and looking to be reduced
to $4,000.
155) 1000-75-6-9. 5
Joseph & AngelaFristachi
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
107
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $9,100 and looking for a
reduction to $4,550.
May 28, 1993
156) 1000-70-5-2
Gerard Gaughran
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Main Road, Southold, currently assessed at $7,900 and
looking to be reduced to $3 ,950.
157) 1000-33-3-14
Manuel & Irene Gavras
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Green Hill Lane, Greenport, currently assessed at
$7,800 and looking for a reduction to $3,900. Insufficient.
158) 1000-26-1-21
Pierre Gazarian
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Miller' s Lane, Orient, assessed at $7,900 and looking
for a reduction to $3,950. Sold in 1991 for $75,000. Any other
questions? Put this one aside.
159) 1000-87-3-50
Royal & Virginia Gifford
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,800 and looking to be reduced
to $2,900. No other information on the card. Insufficient.
160) 1000-70-13-14
William J & Mary Ann Going
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
411 108
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,700 and looking for a
reduction to $2,850. This was recently increased from $5,600 to
$5,700 because there was the construction of an attached deck of
$4,800 on it. It was sold to Going in 1991 for $132,000.
161) 1000-41-1-28
Christoper& DanielleGolden
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Washington Ave. , Greenport, assessed at $4,300 and
looking for a reduction to $2,150. It was sold to Golden in 1990 for
$23,000.
162) 1000-21-4-1
William & Artemis Gontzes
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $9,800 and looking to be reduced to
$4,900. No activity since 1988.
Board: Insufficient.
163) 1000-33-2-6
Terry Bubb Gonzalez.
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed $7,600 and looking to be reduced to $3 ,800.
No activity since 1976.
Board: Insufficient.
164) 1000-54-7-18. 8
Mr. & Mrs. Christopher A. Grattan
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Horton Lane, Southold, currently assessed at $8,200
and looking to be reduced to $4,100.
Board: Insufficient.
• 109 S
165) 1000-79-6-14
Charles W. Donna J. Gray
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Southold, assessed at $5,200 and looking to be reduced
to $2,600. Sold in 1991 for 130,000.
Mr. Whelan: I 've got $43,074 based on that sale.
Mr. Sullivan: Put it aside.
166) 1000-109-5-27. 1
Wolfgang O. & Charlotte Grube
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $9,600 and looking for a reduction to
$4,800. Last sale was 1986 at $242. 500.
Board: Insuffficient.
167) 1000-36-2-21
Maria Grzesik
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $6,900 and looking to be reduced
to $3,450. Let' s put this one aside. It has the wrong card.
Mr. Thorp: This brings up a good point. Who put the wrong card on
there? It must have been Paul, unless the Assessors are doing Paul' s
work.
Mr. Sullivan: If he didn't have one on, they would put one on.
Mr. Thorp: Well, if that is the case, his application is
insufficient. Lets call one of the Assessors in and settle this.
Mr. Sullivan: We' ll just hold it until we get one of them in.
Mr. Whelan: If we come to a couple of more like that, we' ll get a
judgement call from them.
Mr. Sullivan: They will attach the property card.
Mr. Thorp: Well, did Paul Henry come in with 177 applications and
let the Assessors do his work?
• 110 •
Mr. Sullivan: If you come in and hand it to them, they' ll put on a
card.
Mr. Whelan: This is a legitamate point here, if the Assessor' s
office is attaching the cards and these complaints are coming in
blank and with no documentation on there.
Mr. Burdy: I think we should find out about this now.
Mr. Whelan: If we went by just these submissions we wouldn' t have
a property card, we wouldn' t have anything.
Mr. English Jr. : These submissions are insufficient.
Mr. Whelan: We are utilizing something that the Assessor' s office
gave us to pull them without merit.
168) 1000-106-12-13 .1
George K. & Edna Hammond
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Canoe Path, Mattituck, currently assessed at $11,200
and looking for a reduction to $5,600. The only activity was May of
1991, it was increased from $8,600 to $11,200, construct addition to
dwelling for $68,000.
Board: Insufficient.
169) 1000-41-1-25
Gregory Hallock
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed for $5,300 and wants it reduced to $2,650.
Board: Insufficient.
170) 1000-55-6-15. 28
Melvin & Janice Hansen
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Southold, currently assessed at $6,500 and looking to
be reduced to $3,150. Lot sold in 1990 for $30,000.
Mr. Thorp: I have no comment on this because I know Mel Hansen.
He was a former tenant of mine.
• 111
•
Mr. Whelan: They were made affordable.
Mr. English Jr. : If it was $100,000, it would still be $3,240.
Mr. Whelan: High Point Meadows was an afforable housing
development, right? There are all kinds of stipulations, you and me
couldn't go in there and buy a house. They are priced below current
market value as a rule.
Mr. Sullivan: I want to put this on hold because I want to go into
this affordable housing later on.
171) 1000-103-12-2
Barbara Haponic/Orlowski
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed for $5,900 and looking for $2,950. It was
reduced in 1992 from $6,000 to $5,900.
Board: Insufficient.
172) 1001-6-6-16
Alfred Harbich
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Forth Street, Greenport, currently assessed at $6,600
and looking to be reduced to $3,300. Last entry is 1982.
Board: Insufficient.
173 ) 1000-31-2-3
Michael & Ano Hartofilis
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: East Marion, currently assessed at $7,900 and looking
to be reduced to $3 ,950. I don't see anything here.
Board: Insufficient.
174) 1000-9-9-28. 1
Nancy Hickey
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
• 112
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $11, 300 and looking for a
reduction to $5,650. This was reduced from $12,100 to $11,300 in
1993.
Mr. Whelan: What day in 1993?
Mr. Sullivan: February 1993.
175) 1000-56-1-2.19
Edward J. & Susan A. Hilyard
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $7,800 and looking to be reduced to
$3,900. This was increased in October of 1991 from $3,800 to $7, 800,
Bayview land to vineyars for $44,000, 1991 constructed one family
dwelling for $95,000.
176) 1000-100-3-10. 8
James & Claudia Hirsch
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Mattituck, currently assessed at $8,500 and would like
it reduced to $4,250.
Board: Insufficient.
177) 1000-102-8-17
Edward & Patricia Hudson
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $8,800 and looking to be reduced
to $4,400.
Board: Insufficient.
178) 1000-26-2-24
Robert & Ann Hulsman
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $17,000 and would like it
reduced to $8,500.
113 .
Board: Insufficient.
179) 1000-115-6-8
Vito C. & Laurie C. Italia
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $6,800 and would like it reduced
to $3 ,400.
Board: Insufficient.
180) 1000-66-3-8
Edward P. & Marion Jablonski
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $9,800 and would like it reduced
to $4,900.
Board: Insufficient.
181) 1000-128-5-6
Robert Johnson & Margaret Feeney
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $8,000 and would like it reduced
to $4,000. No other information.
Board: Insufficient.
182) 1000-71-2-10
William & Anne Jones
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $13 ,400 and would like it
reduced to $6,700. No other info.
Board: Insufficient.
183 ) 1000-79-4-26
Mr. & Mrs. Thomas Jordan
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
115
4110
188) 1000-30-2-62
Steve & Vicki Kasomenakis
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed $12, 200 and would like it reduced
to $6,100. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
189) 1000-97-4-7 .2
Daryl & Susan Ketcham
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan Assessed at $8,900 and requesting a reduction to
$4,550. No other info.
Board: Insufficient.
190) 1000-111-8-13
Matthew & Irene Klaritch
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Skunk Lane, Cutchogue, assessed at $10,000 and would
like it reduced to $5,000. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
191) 1000-103-14-13
Harold J. & Patricia F. Kober
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $7,500 and would like it reduced to
$3 ,750. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
192) 1000-125-1-2. 19
Thomas G. & Theresa Kober
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
t 118
Board: Insufficient.
202) 1000-63-7-25
Louis & Carol Levy
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $11,200 and would like it
reduced to $5,600. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
203) 1000-12-2-10
Mary F. Leyland
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $12,900 and looking for a
reduction to $6,450. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
204) 1000-33-3-9
Salvatore & Loretta LoPrinzi
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $6,800 and looking for a
reduction to $3 ,400.
Board: Insufficient.
205) 1000-102-8-1
Gary M. & Linda M. Long
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $7,800 and would like a
reduction to $3,900. No additional information.
Board: Insufficient.
206) 1000-108-3-8. 8
Michael Loring
c/o Tax Reduction Services
119
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $12,638 and would like a
reduction to $6,319. That was done by the Grievance Board of 1992 .
No further evidence.
Board: Insufficient.
207) 1000-113-5-8
Wallace & Ginny Macomber
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $8,800 and looking for a
reduction to $4,400. No further information.
Board: Insufficient.
208) 1000-20-3-9. 3
Daniel & Linda Mannix
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,900 and would like a
reduction to $2,950. No further information.
Board: Insufficient.
209) 1000-38-2-25
Mr. & Mrs. John Manoglu
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $6,600 and looking for a reduction to
$3,300. No further information.
Board: Insufficient.
210) 1000-78-9-71. 3
Alfred & RoseMarkiewicz
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $8,200 and would like it reduced
to $4,100. No further evidence.
• 120 •
Board: Insufficient.
211) 1000-125-1-2. 24
Mitch Markowski
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $8,425 and looking for a reduction to
$5,150. No other information.
Board: Insufficient.
212) 1000-124-1-3 . 1
Mr. & Mrs. Thomas H. S. May
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Presently assessed at $7,000 and looking for a
reduction to $3,500.
Board: Insufficient.
213 ) 1000-31-7-16
Bobby Mills
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $8,100 and looking for a
reduction to $4,050.
Board: Insufficient.
214) 1000-124-1-3 . 2
Kenneth Minnick
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $8,100 and looking for a
reduction to $4,050 . No further information.
Board: Insufficient.
215) 1000-70-8-49
Frances J. Mulhall
c/o Tax Reduction Services
. 121 •
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $7,400 and looking for a
reduction to $3,700.
Board: Insufficient.
216) 1000-33-2-30
Harry Mulhall
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $7,600 and looking for a
reduction to $3,800. No further information.
Board: Insufficient.
217) 1000-33-4-25
Istepan & Sarah Muradyan
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $6,300 and would like it reduced
to $3 ,150. No further information.
Board: Insufficient.
218) 1000-114-4-1. 1
Elizabeth & Francis Murphy
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $15,900 and looking for a
reduction to $7,950. No further information.
Board: Insufficient.
219) 1000-85-2-5
Henry Oman
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $7,800 and looking for a
reduction to $3,900. No further information.
• 122 •
Board: Insufficient.
220) 1000-33-4-12
Mike & Marika Pappas
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Presently assessed at $7,700 and looking for a
reduction to $3 ,850. No further information.
Board: Insufficient.
221) 1000-106-7-36
Johon G & Katina Pappas
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $7,200 and looking for a
reduction to $3 ,600. No further information.
Board: Insufficient
222) 1000-122-2-6
Dorothy Paulos
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Presently assessed at $4,000 and looking for a
reduction to $2,000. No further information.
Board: Insufficient.
223) 1000-52-3-17
Luigi & Maria Perinuzzi
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Presently assessed at $8,600 and looking for a
reduction to $4,300. No further information.
Board: Insufficient.
224) 1000-104-4-7
Julia & John R. Pesek
c/o Tax Reduction Services
• 123 •
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,500 and would like it reduced
to $2,750. No further information.
Board: Insufficient.
225) 1000-95-4-18.1
Joseph & Bernadette Petersen
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $7,400 and would like it reduced
to $3 ,700. No further information.
Board: Insufficient.
226) 1000-125-4-1
Helen Picinich
c/o Tax Reduction Services
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $8,000 and would like a
reduction to $4,000. No further information.
Board: Insufficient.
227) 1000-22-4-6
Mr. & Mrs. Antonios Politis
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Presently assessed at $6,100 and would like a
reduction to $3,050. No further information.
Board: Insufficient.
228) 1000-78-1-16
Mr. & Mrs. John A. Polywoda
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $8,500 and requesting it be reduced to
$4,250. No further information.
Board: Insufficient.
•
124 •
229) 1000-109-3-2.11
Rita & Pierce Power
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Presently assessed at $11,700 and looking for a
reduction to $5,850. No further information.
Board: Insufficient.
230) 1000-121-1-4.3
Joseph & Lee Pufahl
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Presently assessed at $11,000 and looking for a
reduction to $5,500. No further information.
Board: Insufficient.
231) 1000-36-2-11
Mr. & Mrs. Henry L. Quintin
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $7,900 and looking for a
reduction to $3 ,950. No further information.
Board: Insufficient.
232) 1000-17-2-3 .1
Mr. & Mrs. Edwin K. Reeves
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $11,300 and looking for a
reduction to $5,650. No further information.
Board: Insufficient.
233 ) 1000-54-3-19
Vincent & Veronica C. Regan
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
• 125 •
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $6,700 and wants it reduced to $3,350. No
further information.
Board: Insufficient.
234) 1000-33-2-18
Mr. & Mrs. Achilles Renzulli
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $9,000 and wants it reduced to $4,500. No
further information.
Board: Insufficient.
235) 1000-33-3-33
Craig A. & Barbara Richter
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Presently assessed at $7 ,300 and would like it reduced
to $3 ,650. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
236) 1000-33-2-2 & 3
Gus & Konstantino Sakarellos
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $8,700 and looking for a reduction to
$4,350. Two lots, lot 2 is assessed at $8,700 and lot 3 is assessed
at $1 , 000. He' s only disputing lot 2 on West Wood Lane. No further
info.
Board: Insufficient.
237) 1000-109-2-18
Irene Sawastynowicz
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $6,100 and looking for a reduction to
$3 ,050. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
126 •
238) 1000-117-6-16. 3
Edward R. & Sharon Schmidt
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $11,500 and looking for a reduction to
$5,750. Just for info, Small Claims gave them that down from $14,700
in 1993. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
239) 1000-40-1-9
Helene J. Schmidt
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $14,200 and asking for a reduction to
$7,100. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
240) 1000-35-8-3 .3
Fred & Jenny Schoenstein
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $7, 500 and would like it reduced to
$3 ,750. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
241) 1000-35-8-3 . 4
Otto & June Schoenstein
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $6,900 and looking for a
reduction to $3 ,450. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
242) 1000-22-2-44
Mr. & Mrs. Stephen Schott
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
110 127 •
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $6,100 and would like to be reduced to
$3,050. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
243 ) 1000-144-1-24
Richard & Marie Schulken
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Presently assessed at $2,800 and wants a reduction to
$1,400. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
244) 1000-9-10-12
Mr. & Mrs. J. Scott
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $9,700 and would like it reduced to
$4,850. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
245) 1000-125-1-2.23
Sally & Louis Scotto
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $6,300 and would like it reduced
to $3,150. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
246) 1000-13-2-9
Nathan B. Seidman
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Presently assessed at $12,400 and would like it
reduced to $6,200. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
•
• 128 •
247 ) 1001-2-6-39
Bernard & Ann Shustrin
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Greenport, presently assessed at $5,400 and would like
it reduced to $2,700. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
248) 1000-115-6-30
Joseph B. & Mary Sieczka
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Presently assessed at $12,000 and would like it
reduced to 6,000. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
249) 1000-70-12-1
Renzo Simeone
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $4,700 and looking for a
reduction to $2,350. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
250) 1000-107-2-4
Gregory Simonelli
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $9,000 and would like it reduced
to $4, 500. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
251) 1000-35-3-4. 2
Stanley Skrezec
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
• • 129 •
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $5,600 and would like it reduced to
$2,800. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
252) 1000-103-1-20. 8
Judith & Hendrickson Sposato
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $8,600 and would like it reduced
to $4, 300. Sposato is the last name. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
253) 1000-41-1-7
Robert Staples
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $4,500 and would like it reduced
to $2,250. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
254) 1000-51-1-11
David & Cynthia Steinbuch
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $13,500 and would like it
reduced to $6,750. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
255) 1000-33-4-5
Mr. & Mrs. Christ Stratakis
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $13, 500 and would like it reduced to
$6,750. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
130 411
256) V 0 I D / No Application
257) 1000-141-1-29
Walter & Bernice Sujeski
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $8,200 and would like it reduced
to $4,100. No further info.
Board: Insufficient
258) 1000-141-2-15
Stanley Swanson
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $5,625 and would like it reduced to $3,750.
259) 1001-2-6-16
Jorge & Maura & Alicia Szendiuch
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $4,100 and requesting a
reduction to $2,050. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
260) 1000-141-1-37. 2
Mark & Lynn Tesser
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,500 and would like it reduced
to $2,750. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
261) 1000-52-3-28
Nicholas Tzoumas
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
131 410
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $9,700 and would like it reduced to
$4,850. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
262) 1000-38-5-4
Eleanor B. Ulich
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Presently assessed at $7,300 and would like it reduced
to $3,650. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
263) 1000-22-1-9
Joseph N. & Rhoda Vandernorth III
c/o Tax Reduction Services
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $6,900 and would like it reduced
to $3, 500. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
264) 1000-107-2-14
Constantine & Magdalen Vloutely
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $7,300 and looking for a
reduction to $3 ,650. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
265) 1000-33-4-13
John Voiklis
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $7,500 and would like it reduced
to $3 ,750. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
266) 1000-22-5-10
132 410
John & Marcella Volandes
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assessed at $9, 500 and would like it reduced to $4,750.
267) 1000-109-3-2. 41
Linda Warren
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Presently assessed at $8,000 and would like it reduced
to $4,000. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
268) 1000-18-6-24. 1
May Watson
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Assesssed at $15,200 and would like it reduced to
$7,600. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
269) 1000-141-4-16
Edward & Bertha Wilcenski
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Presently assessed at $6,900 and would like it reduced
to $3 ,450. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
270) 1000-44-1-13
John Xikis
c/o Tax Reduction Services
F.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Presently assessed at $11,800 and would like it
reduced to $5,900. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
133
271) 1000-44-3-1
John Xikis
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $8,600 and would like it reduced
to $4,300. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
272) 1000-31-16-8
Richard W. Zatarian
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $2, 200 and would like it reduced
to $1,100. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
273) 1000-78-2-26
Atilio & Marsha Zupicich
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $8,200 and looking to be
reduced to $4,100. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
274) 1000-38-2-5
125-127 Main St. Corp
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $6,000 and would like it reduced
to $3 ,000. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
275) 1001-5-3-18
George Aydinian
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
134 .
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $10,800 and would like it
reduced to $4,500. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
276) 1000-45-6-4
Bostwick Day Co.
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed $33 ,100 and would like it reduced
to $12,450.
Board: Insufficient.
277) 1000-84-3-1.1
Bob Hamilton
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $23,600 and would like it
reduced to $7,500. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
278) 1001-2-2-41
Donald Katz
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $14,300 and would like it
reduced to $5,000. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
279) 1001-4-10-31
Frederick Preston & Ors.
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $28,700 and would like it
reduced to $7,500. No further info.
Board: Insufficient.
135
280) 1000-53-5-12. 5
James Sage
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $73, 265 and would like it
reduced to $25,000.
281) 1000-87-1-1-2
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Huber J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, New York 10118
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $2,730 and would like it reduced
to $3,000.
282) 1000-87-1-1-9
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, New York 10118
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $600 and would like it reduced
to $500.
283) 1000-87.1-1-10
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, New York 10118
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $600 and would like it reduced
to $500.
284) 1000-87-1-1-10
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $600 and would like it reduced
to $500.
285) 1000-87-1-1-12
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
• 136 •
New York, N.Y. 10118
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $600 and would like it reduced
to $500.
286) 1000-87-1-1-13
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $2,000 and would like it reduced
to $1,660.
287) 1000-87-1-1-14
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $2,000 and would like it reduced
to $1,660.
288) 1000-87-1-1-15
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $2,000 and would like it reduced
to $1,660.
289) 1000-87-1-1-16
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $2,000 and would like it reduced
to $1,660.
290) 1000-87-1-1-17
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $2,000 and would like it reduced
to $1,660.
• 137 •
291) 1000-87-1-1-18
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $2,000 and would like it reduced
to $1,660.
292) 1000-87-1-1-19
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $2,000 and would like it reduced
to $1,660.
293 ) 1000-87-1-1-20
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $2,000 and would like it reduced
to $1,660.
294) 1000-87-1-1-25
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $2,730 and would like it reduced
to $3,290.
295) 1000-87-1-1-26
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $2,730 and would like it reduced
to $3,290.
296) 1000-87-1-1-27
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
• 138 •
New York, N.Y. 10118
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $2,730 and would like it reduced
to $3 ,290.
297) 1000-87-1-1-28
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $2,730 and would like it reduced
to $3 ,290.
298) 1000-87-1-1-29
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $2,730 and would like it
reduced to $3,290.
299) 1000-87-1-1-30
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $2,730 and would like it reduced
to $3 ,290.
300) 1000-87-1-1-31
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $2,730 and would like it reduced
to $3 ,290.
301) 1000-87-1-1-32
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $2,730 and would like it reduced
to $3,290.
• 139 •
302) 1000-63.2-1-1 Through 47
Founders Village Condominium II
c/o Certilman, Balin, Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Avenue
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Mr. Sullivan: The following units are grieving on a basis of
inequality.
Unit No. Current Assessment Claimed Valuation
1 $4, 500 $1,125
2 4,200 1,050
3 4,200 1,050
4 4,200 1,050
5 4,500 1,125
6 4,500 1,125
7 4, 200 1,050
8 4,200 1,050
9 4,200 1,050
10 4, 500 1,125
11 4,200 1,050
12 4,200 1,050
13 4,200 1,050
14 4,200 1,050
15 4,500 1,125
16 4, 500 1,125
17 4,200 3,150
18 4, 200 3, 150
19 4,200 3 ,150
20 4,500 1,125
21 4, 500 1,125
22 4,500 1,125
23 4,200 1, 050
24 4,200 1,050
25 4,200 1,050
26 4,500 1,125
27 4,500 1,125
28 4,500 1,125
29 4,500 1,125
30 4,200 1,050
31 4,200 1, 050
32 4,200 1,050
33 4,500 1,125
34 4,200 1,050
35 4,200 1,050
36 4,200 1,050
37 4,500 1,125
38 4,500 1,125
39 4,200 1,050
40 4, 200 1,050
41 4,200 1,050
42 4,500 1,125
43 4,500 1, 125
44 4,200 1,050
• 140 •
45 4,200 1 ,050
46 4,200 1,050
47 4,500 1, 125
303 ) 1000-63 . 1-1-1 Through 45
Founders Village Condominium I
c/o Certilman, Balin, Alder & Hyman
90 Merrick Avenue
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Mr. Sullivan: Claimed valuation is one fourth of assessed value.
Unit No. Current Assessment Claimed Valuation
1 $4,500 $1,125
2 4,200 1,050
3 4,200 1,050
4 4,200 1,050
5 4,500 1,125
6 4, 500 1,125
7 4,200 1,050
8 4, 200 1 ,050
9 4,200 1,050
10 4,500 1,125
11 4 ,500 1,125
12 4,200 1,050
13 4,200 1,050
14 4,200 1,050
15 4,500 1,125
16 4, 500 1,125
17 4,200 1,050
18 4,200 1,050
19 4,200 1,050
20 4,500 1,125
21 4,500 1,125
22 4, 200 1,050
23 4,200 1,050
24 4,200 1,050
25 4,500 1,125
26 4,500 1,125
27 4,200 1,050
28 4,200 1,050
29 4,200 1,050
30 4,500 1,125
31 4,500 1,125
32 4,200 1,050
33 4,200 1,050
34 4,200 1,050
35 4,500 1,125
36 4,500 1,125
37 4,200 1,050
38 4,200 1,050
411 141 .
39 4,200 1,050
40 4 ,500 1,125
41 4,500 1,125
42 4, 200 1,050
43 4,200 1,050
44 4,200 1,050
45 4, 500 1, 125
304) 1000-63. 1-1-47
Founders Village Homeowners Assoc. Inc.
c/o Certilman, Balin, Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Avenue
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $3,000 and would like it reduced
to $750.
305) 1001-7.-1-16. 2
Pipes Cove Condominium Board of Managers
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $9,000 and would like it reduced
to $2,700.
306) 1001-7. -1-16. 3
Pipes Cove Condominium Board of Managers
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $9,000 and would like it reduced
to $2,700.
307) 1001-7. -1-16.4
Pipes Cove Condominium Board of Managers
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $10,100 and would like it
reduced to $3 ,030.
308) 1001-7 .-1-16. 5
Pipes Cove Condominium Board of Managers
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
• 142411
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $10,100 and would like it
reduced to $3,030.
309) 1000-49.-1-25. 2
Pipes Cove Condominium Board of Managers
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $8,600 and would like it reduced
to $2, 580.
310) 1000-49.-1-25. 3
Pipes Cove Condominium Board of Managers
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $8,600 and would like it reduced
to $2,580.
311) 1000-49.-1-25. 4
Pipes Cove Condominium Board of Managers
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $8,600 and would like it reduced
to $2,580.
312) 1000-49.-1-25. 5
Pipes Cove Condominium Board of Managers
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $8,600 and would like it reduced
to $2,580.
313) 1000-49. -1-25. 6
Pipes Cove Condominium Board of Managers
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $8,600 and would like it reduced
to $2,580.
143410
314) 1000-44.1-1-1
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,600 and would like it
assessed at $1,680.
315) 1000-44. 1-1-2
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,600 and would like it reduced
to $1,680 .
316) 1000-44.1-1-3
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,600 and would like it reduced
to $1,600.
317) 1000-44.1-1-4
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,900 and would like it reduced
to $1,770.
318) 1000-44. 1-1-5
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
2000 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,600 and would like it reduced
to $1,600.
319) 1000-44.1. -1-6
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
144
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,600 and would like it reduced
to $1,600.
320) 1000-44.1-1-7
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,600 and would like it reduced
to $1,600.
321) 1000-44.11-1-8
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,900 and would like it reduced
to $1,770.
322) 1000-44.1-1-9
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,900 and would like it reduced
to $1,770.
323) 1000-44. 1-1-10
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,600 and would like it reduced
to $1,600.
324) 1000-44. 1-1-11
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
MIneola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,600 and would like it reduced
to $1,600.
145110
325) 1000-44.1-1-12
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,600 and would like it reduced
to $1,600.
326) 1000-44. 1-1-13
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,900 and would like it reduced
to $1,770.
327) 1000-44. 1-1-14
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,600 and would like it reduced
to $1,600.
328) 1000-44. 1-1-15
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,600 and would like it reduced
to $1,600.
329) 1000-44. 1-1-16
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,600 and would like it reduced
to $1,600.
330) 1000-51. 1-1-10
Board of Managers of Eastwind Shores Condominium Assoc.
c/o Reilly Like Tenety & Ambrosino
200 West Main Street
• 146 •
P.O. Box 818
Babylon N.Y. 11702
Mr. Sullivan: Ten units currently assessed at $6,300 each and they
would like them reduced to $1,494.
331) 1000-97-5-11
New York Telephone Company
c/o Murphy, Lynch Limone & Gionis, P.C.
P.O. Box 69, 1045 Oyster Bay Rd.
East Norwich, N.Y. 11732
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $28,600 and would like it
reduced to $1,800.
332) 1000-51-3-3. 19
Chardonnay Woods Homeowners Association, Inc.
c/o Murphy Lynch Limine & Gionis, P.C.
P.O. Box 69, 1045 Oyster Bay Rd.
East Norwich, N.Y. 11732
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $400 and would like it reduced
to $120.
333 ) 1000-45-4-8. 1
New York Telephone Company
c/o Murphy Lynch Limone & Gionis, P.C.
P.O. Box 69, 1045 Oyster Bay Rd.
East Norwich, N.Y. 11732
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $23 ,250 and would like it
reduced to $2,000.
334) 1000-666' s
New York Telephone Company
c/o Murphy Lynch Limone & Gionis, P.C.
P.O. Box 69, 1045 Oyster Bay Rd.
East Norwich, N.Y. 11732
Mr. Sullivan: Fourteen lots currently assessed and looking for a
reduction to as follows:
Requested
Lot Current Assess. Reduction
1) 1000-666. -2-4 $1, 551 $300
2) 1000-666.-2-6 1, 269 246
3 ) 1000-666. -5-9 1,180 230
4) 1000-666. -5-7 1,139 220
• 147411
5) 1000-666. -5-11 4,287 840
6) 1000-666.-9-16 4,593 900
7) 1000-666.-9-17 300 60
8) 1000-666.-9-11 1,793 350
9) 1000-666.-9-12 1,372 270
10) 1000-666. -9-9 963 190
11) 1000-666. -10-4 2,226 440
12) 1000-666. -11-4 555 100
13 ) 1000-666. -11-2 861 170
14) 1000-666. -15-3 861 170
335) 1000-97-5-12
NLS Company
c/o Siegel Fenchel & Peddy, P.C.
777 Zeckendorf Blvd.
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $71,300 and would like it
reduced to $17,825.
336) 1000-106-6-13. 3
Mattituck Holding Company
c/o Meyer Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C.
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $99,200 and would like it
reduced to $25,000.
337) 1000-84-2-4. 1
Marlake Associates
c/o Certilman, Balin, Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Avenue
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $33,900 and would like it
reduced to $8,475 .
338) 1000-73-3-1.1
Marlake Associates
c/o Certilman, Balin, Adler & Hymann P.C.
90 Merrick Avenue
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $24,100 and would like it
reduced to $6,025.
339) 1001-4-7-12
Mandel Family Corp.
148 •
•
c/o Siegel Fenchel & Peddy, P.C.
777 Zeckendorf Dlvd.
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $13,400 and would like it
reduced to $3,350.
340) 1000-101-1-5. 2
L & R Vineyards Associates
c/o Koeppel, Martone, Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $29,900 and would like it
reduced to $7,475.
341) 1000-101-14.1
L & R Vineyards Associates
c/o Koeppel, Martone, Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $3,500 and would like it reduced
to $875.
342) 1001-5-4-31. 1
Emanuel Kontakosta
c/o Podell Rothman Schechter & Banfield
160 Broadway
New York, N.Y. 10038
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $6,300 and would like it reduced
to $1,600.
343 ) 1001-5-4-7.4
Emanuel Kontakosta
c/o Podell Rothman Schecther & Banfield
160 Broadway
New York, N.Y. 10038
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,300 and would like it reduced
to $1,000.
344) 1001-5-4-7. 2
Emanel Kontakosta
c/o Podell Rothman Schechter & Banfield
160 Broadway
New York, N.Y. 10038
. 149 •
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $29,100 and would like it
reduced to $7,000.
345A)1001-4-9-28. 2
Gusmar Realty Corp.
c/o Podell Rothman Schechter & Banfield
160 Broadway
New York, N.Y. 10038
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $50,500 and would like it
reduced to $13 ,000.
345B)1001-4-9-28.2
Gusmar Realty Corp.
c/o Koeppel Martone Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $50,500 and would like it
reduced to $12,625.
346) 1000-114-12-2
James L. Gray & Peter S. Gray
c/o Koeppel Martone Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $18,000 and would like it
reduced to $4,500.
347) 1000-142-1-26
Genovese Drug Stores Inc.
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris P.C.
200 old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $189,200 and would like a
reduction to $56,760.
348) 1000-61-3-7
Fleet Bank
c/o David G. Koch Esq.
170 Old Country Road
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $38,500 and would like it
reduced to $9,625.
• 150 •
349) 1001-5-1-17. 1
Tullio Bertoli & Anthony Demasco
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein P.C.
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $16,065 and would like it
reduced to $5,000.
350) 1001-3-5-28. 1
Tullio Bertoli & Anthony Demasco
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein P.C.
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
351) 1000-60-2-3 .1
Cutcho Corp
c/o Certilman, Balin, Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Ave
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $3,000 and would like it reduced
to $750.
352) 1000-102-5-24
Colgate Design Corp.
c/o Lite & Lite, P.C.
239 Higbie Lane
West Islip, N.Y. 11795
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $8,400 and would like it reduced
to $2,100.
353 ) 1001-5-4-25
William F. Claudio, Inc.
c/o Koeppel Martone Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $3,800 and would like it reduced
to $950.
354) 1001-5-4-38. 1
William F. Claudio Inc.
c/o Koeppel Martone Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
• 151 •
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $53 ,000 and would like it
reduced to $13,250.
355) 1000-142-1-26
Alan A. Cardinale
c/o Certilman, Balin, Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Ave.
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $189,200 and would like it
reduced to $45,200.
356) 1000-102-3-1
Nicholas Aliano
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $8,200 and would like it reduced
to $2,460.
357) 1001-4-10-5
The Bank of New York
c/o Farrel Fritz Caemmerer
Cleary Barnosky & Armentano, P.C.
EAB Plaza, West Tower, 14th Floor
Uniondale, N.Y. 11556-0120
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $19,900 and would like it
reduced to $5,500.
358) 1000-97-5-12
King Kullen Grocery Co. , Inc. #3
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
359) 1000-34-2-1
Jordon's Partners & Ano
c/o Koeppel Martone Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $8,700 and would like it reduced
to $2,175.
360) 1000-122-3-10
Hodor-Staller & Kasper Bldg #170
152
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $6,300 and would like it reduced
to $1,890.
361) 1000-51-3-3 . 11
Harmat Cap Corp
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,400 and would like it reduced
to $420.
362) 121-7-1/15
1000-120-3-8. 3/8.41
Farmveu Associates
c/o Werner L. Adel Jr.
12 Fox Meadow Lane
Huntington, N.Y. 11743
Mr. Sullivan: Total of 54 vacant lots, current assessment at
$1,650,000 and would like it reduced to $40,796. Tax map numbers
listed on application do not show individual request of reduction.
363) 1000-51-3-3. 20
Chardonnay Woods Homeowners Association Inc.
c/o Murphy Lynch Limone & Gionis P.C.
P.O. Box 69
1045 Oyster Bay Rd.
EAst Norwich, N.Y. 11732
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $7 ,000 and would like it reduced
to $1,800.
364) 1001-5-4-7. 3
Arc Enterprises
c/o Podell Rothman Schechter & Banfield
160 Broadway
New York, N.Y. 10038
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $4,700 and would like it reduced
to $1,000.
365) 1000-74-4-4
Nicholas Aliano
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
• 153
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $4,300 and would like it reduced
to $1,290.
366) 1000-59-9-30. 5
Nicholas Aliano
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,100 and would like it reduced
to $330.
367) 1000-46-1-2.1
Nicholas Aliano
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $3,800 and would like it reduced
to $1,140.
368) 1000-87-6-12. 1
Airam Enterprises Inc.
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $37,200 and would like it
reduced to $11,160.
369) 1001-6-2-23 .1
Sterlington Commons Assoc.
c/o Moroze Sherman Gordon & Gordon P.C.
c/o Siegel et. al
777 Zeckendorf Blvd
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $63,400 and would like it
reduced to $15,850.
370) 1001-4-10-10.1
North Fork Bank
c/o Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Ave.
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
154 411
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $38,800 and would like it
reduced to $9,700.
371) 1000-60-2-10.4
North Fork Bank
c/o Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Ave
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $150,200 and would like it
reduced to $37,550.
372) 1000-61-2-12.2
North Fork Bank
c/o Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Ave
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $187 ,600 and would like it
reduced to $46,900 .
373 ) 1000-102-6-13 . 1
North Fork, Bank
c/o Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Ave.
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Mr. Sullivan: Presently assessed at $23 ,200 and would like it
reduced to $5,800.
374) 1000-122-6-20
North Fork Bank
c/o Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Ave.
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $180, 200 and would like it
reduced to $45,050.
375) 1000-122-6-22
North Fork Bank
c/o Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Ave
EAst Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $26,100 and would like it
reduced to $6,525.
155 i
376) 1000-141-3-30
North Fork Bank
c/o Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Ave.
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $500 and would like it reduced
to $125.
377) 1000-141-4-2
North Fork Bank
c/o Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Ave.
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $2,000 and would like it reduced
to $500.
378) 1000-141-4-3
North Fork Bank
c/o Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Ave.
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $3,700 and would like it reduced
to $925.
379) 1000-141-4-6. 1
North Fork Bank
c/o Certilman Ba.lin Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Ave
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $73,600 and would like it
reduced to $18,400.
380) 1000-15-3-17
Anthony Perrera
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $2,900 and would like it reduced
to $870.
381) 1000-15-8-14.4
Anthony Pirrera
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
• 156
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,600 and would like it reduced
to $480.
382) 1000-19-1-12. 3
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,500 and would like it reduced
to $450.
383) 1000-35-4-25
Anthony Pirrera
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $2,400 and would like it reduced
to $720.
384) 1000-40-1-20. 1
Anthony Pirrera
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $6,500 and would like a
reduction to $1,950.
385) 1000-40-1-20. 2
Anthony Pirrera
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $6,500 and would like it reduced
to $1,950.
386) 1000-55-2-20
Anthony Pirrera
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $27,100 and would like it
reduced to $8,130.
• 157 •
387) 1000-55-2-21
Anthony Pirrera
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $2,700 and would like it reduced
to $810.
388) 1000-113-12-15
Anthony Pirrera
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr Sullivan: Currently assessed at $11,200 and would like it reduced
to $3,360.
389) 1000-83-1-12
Pond Enterprises Inc.
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $800 and would like it reduced
to $240.
390) 1000-83-1-13
Pond Enterprises Inc.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $600 and would like it reduced
to $180 .
391) 1000-83-1-14
Pond Enterprises Inc.
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $500 and would like it reduced
to $150.
392) 1000-83-1-15
Pond Enterprises Inc.
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
• 158 •
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $600 and would like it reduced
to $180.
393) 1000-83-2-1
Pond Enterprises
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $52,100 and would like it
reduced to $15,630.
394) 1000-83-2-2
Pond Enterprises Inc.
c/o Cronin, Cronin Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $15,100 and would like it
reduced to $4,530.
395) 1000-55-5-2.4
Pudge Corp.
c/o Meyer Suozzi English & Klein P.C.
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $7,400 and would like it reduced
to $2,000.
396) 1000-60-2-4
Pudge Corp.
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $6,300 and would like it
reduced to $1,575.
397) 1000-61-1-13 .1
Pudge Corp.
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $82,200 and would like it
reduced to $20,000.
• 159 •
398) 1000-61-4-22
Pudge Corp.
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $26,900 and would like it
reduced to $7,500.
399) 1000-63-1-1.6
Pudge Corp.
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $5,500 and would like it reduced
to $1,375.
400) 1000-63-1-10
Pudge Corp.
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $71,000 and would like it
reduced to $13,000.
401) 1000-70-2-11
Pudge Corp.
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $11,500 and would like it
reduced to $2,875.
402) 1000-84-1-26. 3
Pudge Corp.
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $58,800 and would like it
reduced to $14,700.
403 ) 1000-118-2-1
Pudge Corp.
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
411 160 •
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $3 ,200 and would like it reduced
to $800.
404) 1000-118-2-2
Pudge Corp.
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,500 and would like it reduced
to $350.
405) 1000-118-2-4
Pudge Corp.
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein
1505 Kellum Place
Mlneola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,600 and would like it reduced
to $400.
406) 1000-73-2-3.6
R.L.M. Realty of N.Y. Inc.
c/o Siegel Fenchel & Peddy P.C.
777 Zeckendorf Blvd
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $3,900 and would like it reduced
to $975.
407) 1000-51-3-3 . 21
Neil Rego
c/o Murphy Lynch Limone & Gionis P.C.
P.O. Box 69
1045 Oyster Bay Road
East Norwich, N.Y. 11732
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $300 and would like it reduced
to $100 .
408) 1000-60-1-6
Romanelli Realty
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $7,600 and would like it reduced
to $2,280.
• 161 .
409) 1000-55-5-7
Roosevelt Savings Bank
c/o Koeppel Marton Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $42,700 and would like it
reduced to $10,675.
410) 1001-4-9-23 . 4
Snargate Development Co. of Gpt. Ltd.
c/o Koeppel Martone Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $26,100 and would like it
reduced to $6,525.
411) 1000-46-1-2. 2
The Southland Corp.
c/o Wimpfheimer & Sherman Esqs.
1100 Franklin Ave, Suite PH400
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $10,600 and would like it
reduced to $5,000.
412) 1000-62-3-37
The Southold Corp.
c/o Wimpfheimer & Sherman Esqs
1100 Franklin Ave. , Suite PH400
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $10,100 and would like it
reduced to $50,000.
413 ) 1000-102-5-24
The Southland Corp.
c/o Wimpfheimer & Sherman Esqs.
1100 Franklin Ave. , Suite PH400
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $8,400 and would like it reduced
to $1, 245.
414) 1001-3-4-31
Tidal Properties Inc.
c/o Koeppel Martone Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
411 162 .
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $3 ,000 and would like it reduced
to $775.
415) 1001-3-4-47
Tidal Properties Inc.
c/o Koeppel Martone Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,000 and would like it reduced
to $250.
416) 1001-3-516. 2
Tidal Properties Inc.
c/o Koeppel Martone Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $26,500 and would like it
reduced to $6,625.
417) 1000-97-5-4.7
WMS Realty Inc.
c/o Siegel Genchel & Peddy, P.C.
777 Zeckendorf Blvd
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $13 ,202 and would like it
reduced to $3 ,300.
418) 1000-21-6-1
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 OLd Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,400 and would like it reduced
to $420.
419) 1000-21-6-2
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, New York 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,500 and would like it reduced
to $450.
• 163 •
420) 1000-21-6-3
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,200 and would like it reduced
to $360.
421) 1000-21-6-4
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,200 and would like it reduced
$360.
422) 1000-21-6-5
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 OldCountry Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,200 and would like it reduced
to $360.
423 ) 1000-21-6-6
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,200 and would like it reduced
to $360.
424) 1000-21-6-7
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1, 500 and would like it reduced
to $450.
425) 1000-21-6-8
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
. 164 •
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,400 and would like it reduced
to $420.
426) 1000-30-3-1
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,500 and would like it reduced
to $450.
427) 1000-30-3-2
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,500 and would like it reduced
to $450.
428) 1000-30-3-4
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,400 and would like it reduced
to $420.
429) 1000-30-3-5
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,200 and would like it reduced
to $360.
430) 1000-30-3-6
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,200 and would like it reduced
to $360.
165
Y '
431)1000-30-3-7
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,500 and would like it reduced
to $450.
432) 1000-30-3-8
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr.Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,500 and would like it reduced
to $450.
433 ) 1000-30-3-9
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,500 and would like it reduced
to $450.
434) 1000-30-3-10
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, F.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,400 and would like it reduced
to $420.
435) 1000-30-3-11
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,200 and would like it reduced
to $360.
436) 1000-30-3-12
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
v4 r •
. 166 •
� r i
4
Is •
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,200 and would like it reduced
to $360.
437) 1000-30-3-13
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $9,500 and would like it reduced
to $2,850.
438) 1000-31-1-5.4
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,500 and would like it reduced
to $450.
439) 1000-31-1-5.5
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,500 and would like it reduced
to $450.
440) 1000-31-1-5.6
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,400 and would like it reduced
to $420.
441) 1000-31-1-5.7
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,200 and would like it reduced
to $360.
167 41/
w
442) 1000-31-1-5. 8
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $1,200 and would like it reduced
to $360.
443 ) 1001-4-9-7
235 Mill Street Inc.
c/o Koeppel Marton Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $27,000 and would like it
reduced to $6,750.
444) 1000-102-5-26
808 Realty Corp.
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Sullivan: Currently assessed at $6,000 and would like it reduced
to $1,800.
May 28, 1993 End of Grievance Cases Reviewed.
•
RECEIVED
/p.'37�1•/3'l.
AUG 101993
Twin cm* whom
DECISION DAY
May 25, 1993
The Board of assesment Review Decision Meeting was called to
order at 9: 15 a.m. present were:
John Sullivan, Chairman
Thomas Burdy, Co-Chairman
William F. English Jr.
Francis A. Thorp
Robert H. Whelan
1) Denied 1000-117-5-46. 3
Gerard H. & Carolyn Schultheis
43 Harding Road
Old Greenwich, CT. 06870
Board: Vote unanimous.
2) Denied 1001-4-7-16
Pat & Paul Kulsziski
433 Main Street
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
3) Denied 1000-104-4-32
John P.A. & Christine D. Marcin
34 Harvard Street
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Board: Vote unanimous.
4) Denied 1000-52-1-8
Mr. & Mrs. Varujan Arslanyan
1055 River Road
Edgewater, N.J. 07020
Board: Vote unanimous.
• 2
410
5) Denied 1000-117-4-26
William J. Sullivan
945 Fanning Rd. Box 317
New Suffolk, N.Y. 11956
Board: Vote unanimous.
6) Reduced from $7,100 to $6,200
1000-101-1-16. 2
Frances Slezak & Alf Sommerstad
7405 Alvahs Lane
Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935
Board: Vote unanimous.
7) Reduced from $7,800 to $6,200
1000-95-4-18.32
William T. Lademann
P.O. Box 1030
Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935
Board: Vote unanimous.
8) Denied 1000-110-8-32.9
Thomas Wickham
P.O. Box 928
Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935
Board: Vote 3 for denial, one abstention.
9) Denied 1000-115-11-17
Camilla Corso
750 Lupton Point Road
Mattituck, N.Y. 11952
Board: Vote unanimous.
10) Denied 1000-35-2-12
Floyd F. King
Island' s End Golf & Country Club, Inc.
F.O. Box 2066
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote 3 for denial, one abstention.
11) Denied 1001-5-3-16. 1
FUR & GAMES, INC.
P.O. Box 119, 132 Main St.
• 3 •
z f
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
12) Denied 1000-43-4-37
Mr. & Mrs. Dominick Sblendido
6 Clark Street
Huntington, N.Y. 11743
Board: Vote unanimous
13) Reduced from $6,100 to $5,300
1000-34-4-19. 1
Antoinette & Wm. Pollert
P.O. Box 578
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Board: Vote unanimous.
14) Denied 1000-123-10-1
Patricia Gazouleas
960 Willis Creek Drive
Mattituck, N.Y. 11952
Board: Vote unanimous.
15) Denied 1000-145-4-14.1
Bertram W. & Margery M. Walker
P.O. Box 1169
Mattituck, N.Y. 11952
Board: Vote unanimous.
16) Reduced from $5,800 to $5,100
1000-33-4-83
Jerry Colaitis
77 Woodedge Road
Plandome, N.Y. 11030
Board: Vote unanimous.
17) Denied 1000-143-5-11
Joseph & Eleanore Friedman
590 Riley Avenue
Mattituck, N.Y. 11952
Board: Vote unanimous.
• 4410
18) Denied 1000-106-5-4
Vasilios Lambiris
c/o Vanessa A. Ploumis Esq.
64 East 34th Street
New York, N.Y. 10016
Board: Vote unanimous.
19) Reduced from $13 ,700 to $9,700
1000-106-10-28. 5
Mahir & Greta Zara
P.O. Box 910
Mattituck, N.Y. 11952
Board: Vote unanimous.
20) Reduced from $6,600 to $5,900
1000-88-4-24
Joseph & Susan Macchia
340 Bay Haven Lane
Southold, N.Y.
Board: Vote unanimous.
21) Denied 1000-33-1-10
Mr. & Mrs. Richard Kopek
2800 Sound Drive
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
22) Reduced from $6,740 to $6,300
1000-103-14-2
Paul & Jane Kendarich
3600 Pequash Avenue
Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935
Board: Vote unanimous.
23 ) Denied 1000-106-8-50.7
Daniel V. Brisotti
1110 Sunset Drive
Mattituck, N.Y. 11952
Board: Vote unanimous.
24) Reduced from $6,000 to $4,200
1000-2-6-52. 1
• 5 •
David S. Corwin
639 Main Street
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
25) Reduced from $5,000 to $4,200
1000-2-6-41. 1
David S. Corwin
639 Main Street
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
26) Denied 1000-44-1-16
David S. Corwin
639 Main Street
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
27) Reduced from $7,800 to $4,600
1000-115-14-12
Mathew G. & Laurie Daly
P.O. Box 762
Mattituck, N.Y. 11952
Board: Vote unanimous.
28) Denied 1000-44-2-17
Onnik & Araksi Arslanyan
58525 County Road 48
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
29) Denied 1000-63-5-23
Mr. & Mrs. O.D. Lingo
650 Greenfields Lane
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Board: Vote unanimous.
30) Denied 1000-35-2-4
Mr. & Mrs. Rousos Abadiokatis
1516 East 15 Street
Brooklyn, N.Y. 11230
. 6 •
Board: Vote unanimous.
31) Denied 1000-122-6-31
Mr. Parviz Farahzad
22 Jericho Turnpike
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
32) Denied 1000-111-10-16
Mr. Arnold Blair
4560 Vanston Road
Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935
Board: Vote unanimous.
33 ) Denied 1000-113-7-19. 17
Ms. Arline Boeckman
Fred N. Perry, Equire
175 Deer Park Rd.
Dix Hills, N.Y. 11746
Board: Vote unanimous.
34) Denied 1000-45-2-10. 3
North Fork Bank as mortagagee
c/o Certiman, Balin, Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Avenue
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Board: Vote unanimous.
35) Reduced from $7,200 to $5,900
1000-141-1-37. 2
George E. & Grances Toth
111 Haverford Road
Hicksville, N.Y. 11801
Board: Vote unanimous.
36) Reduced from $14,600 to $10, 800
1000-74-1-35. 57
CPF Enterprises
Box 495
Amagansett, N.Y. 11930
Board: Vote unanimous.
7 .
37) Same applicant as 4 36
1000-74-1-35. 57
CPF Enterprises
c/o Mario J. Fusaro
309A Little Plains Road
Huntington, N.Y. 11743
38) Denied 1000-122-4-15, 16
Richard S. & Lorraine M. Burden
2800 Ole Jule Lane
Mattituck, N.Y. 11952
Board: Vote unanimous.
39) Denied 1000-9-6. 3
Ms. Mildred S. Bennett
1714 Claw Court
Venice, Fl. 34293
Board: Vote unanimous.
40) Denied 1000-111-9-6.2
Mr. James D. Bennett
34 Hilton Ave.
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Board: Vote unanimous.
41) Denied 1000-78-9-68
Catholic Charities Mental
c/o Bennett Pape Rice & Schure
255 Merrick Road, P.O. Box 710
Rockville Center, N.Y. 11571
Board: Vote unanimous.
42) Denied 1000-111-9-6. 1
Ms. Judith B. Moore
610 W. Wisteria Ave.
Arcadia, Ca. 91006
Board: Vote unanimous.
43 ) Denied 1000-121-5-3
Mr. Stephen J. Perricone
7470 Sound Ave. Box 41
Mattituck, N.Y. 11952
. 8 •
Board: Vote unanimous.
44) Denied 1000-123-2-11
Mr. Gene Doroski
720 Bungalow Lane
Mattituck, N.Y. 11952
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. English: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
45) Denied 1000-109-5-14. 17
Carmin & Dorothy Aiello
c/o Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. English Jr. : Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
46) Denied 1000-9-11-2. 6
Ashcol Inc.
25 Lake Drive
Riverside, Ct. 06878
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. English Jr. : Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
47 ) Denied 1000-115-6-3
Frederick & Dolores Boeje
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. English Jr. : Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
48) Denied 1000-109-5-14. 6
Thomas & Anne M. Boucher
P.O. Box 1260
Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. Burdy: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
410 9110
49) Denied 1000-8-1-6. 5
Mr. Peter Brinckerhoff
25 Lake Drive
Riverside, Ct. 06878
Mr. Burdy: Motion to deny.
Mr. Thorp: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
50) Denied 1000-122-3-1 . 4
Mr. Alan A. Cardinale
c/o Certilman, Balin, Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Avenue
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. Burdy: Second.
Board: Unanimous.
51) Denied 1000-126-2-15.1
Mr. Edward D. Carney
c/o Cronin, Cronin, & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. English Jr. : Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
52. Denied 1000-128-6-13 . 3
Mr. Victor E. Catalano
P.O. Box 516
Laurel, N.Y. 11948
Mr. Burdy: Motion to deny.
Mr. English Jr. : Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
53 ) Denied 1000-109-5-14. 32
Gladys & Ors Cole
c/o Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. English Jr. : Motion to deny.
Mr. Burdy: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
54) Denied 1000-109-5-14. 20
• 10 •
r •
Mr. William Concagh
c/o Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. Burdy: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
55 ) Reduced from $7,400 to $6,000
1000-115-6-4
Stephen J. & Suzanne A. Conlin
18700 Main Rd. , P.O. Box 1078
Mattituck, N.Y. 11952
Mr. English Jr. : Motion to reduce.
Mr. Thorp: Second.
Board: Unanimous.
56) Denied 1000-40-3-3 . 5
Scott Corwin
c/o Siegel Fenchel & Peddy, P.C.
777 Zeckendorf Blvd.
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Mr. English Jr. : Motion to deny.
Mr. Thorp: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
57) Denied 1000-64-2-15
Mr. Peter T. Demetriou
c/o Wimpfheimer & Sherman, Esqs.
1100 Franklin Avenue - Suite PH400
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. Burdy: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
58) Denied 1000-37-4-1
Ms. Judith DiBlasi
c/o Wimpfheimer & Sherman, Esqs.
1100 Franklin Avenue - Suite PH400
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. English Jr. : Second.
Board: Vote Unanimous.
. 11 S
59) Denied 1000-109-5-14.16
Ms. Catherine Drake
c/o Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. English Jr. : Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
60) Denied 1000-9-10-9. 2
F. I . Parade Grounds Apts. Ltd.
c/o Certilman, Balin, Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Avenue
East Meadow, N.Y.
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. English Jr. : Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
61) Denied 1000-109-5-14.13
Ms. Elizabeth Ann Fett
c/o Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. English Jr. : Second.
Board: Unanimous.
62) Reduced from $5,300 to $5,000.
1000-123-5-31
Mr. Peter S. Gray, Sr.
c/o Koeppel Martone Leistman & Herman
155 First Street, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Burdy: Motion to reduce.
Mr. Thorp: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
63 ) Reduced from $6,200 to $5,500
1000-96-3-8
Edward J. Jr. & Sarah Hansen
1355 Cox Lane
Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935
Mr. Thorp: Motion to reduce.
Mr. English Jr. : Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
• 12
a ,
64) Denied 1000-109-5-14 . 12
Mr. John B. Hayes
c/o Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. Burdy: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
65) Denied 1000-109-5-14. 30
Mr. Walter Hennessey
c/o Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. Burdy: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
66) Denied 1000-117-3-6
Mr. Frederick Koeler Jr.
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. English Jr. : Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
67) Denied 1000-113-6-14. 4
Joel & Chizuko Kroin
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C.
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. English Jr. : Motion to deny.
Mr. Thorp: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
68) Denied 1000-70-13-5
Phillip & Annabelle Loeser
c/o Santemma & Deutsch
120 Mineola Blvd, Suite 510
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. English Jr. : Motion to deny.
Mr. Thorp: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
411 1341/
69) Denied 1000-36-2-26. 1
Mr. Herbert Mandel
c/o Siegel Fenchel & Peddy, P.C.
777 Zeckendorf Blvd.
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Mr. Burdy: Motion to deny.
Mr. English: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
70) Denied 1000-59-3-32. 3
Mr. David J. Markel
Box 436
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Mr. English Jr. : Motion to deny.
Mr. Thorp: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
71) Denied 1000-79-8-1
Mr. Thomas B. Middlemiss
c/o Santemma & Deutsch
120 Mineola Blvd. , Suite 510
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. Burdy: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
72) Denied 1000-31-18-10
Daniel C. & Maureen M. Mooney
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C.
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. English Jr. : Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
73 ) Denied 1000-122-3-4
Ms. Maureen Mooney
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C.
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. Burdy: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
III 14IIP
,
74) Denied 1000-1095-14 . 26
Mr. Theodore Mysliborski
c/o Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. Burdy: Motion to deny.
Mr. English Jr. : Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
75) Denied 1000-44-2-3
Vito & Ann Navarra
c/o Certilman, Balin, Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Avenue
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Mr. Burdy: Motion to deny.
Mr. English Jr. : Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
76 ) Denied 1000-44-2-3
Mr. Anthony Pirrera
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. Burdy: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
77 ) Denied 1000-109-5-14. 34
Mr. Harold Pownall
c/o Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. Burdy: Motion to deny.
Mr. English: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
78) Denied 1000-109-3-2. 40
John & Barbra Prestia
P.O. Box 66
Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. English Jr. : Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
411 15 410
79) Denied 1000-118-2-3
Pudge Corp.
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C.
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. English Jr. : Second
Board: Vote unanimous
80) Denied 1000-100-3-11. 10
Carol & Neal Raffe
c/o Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. Burdy: Motion to deny.
Mr. English Jr. : Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
81) Denied 1000-33-3-2,3
Ms. Florence Rushmore
c/o Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. English Jr. : Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
82) Denied 1000-109-5-14. 28
Frances Sanner
c/o Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. English Jr. : Motion to deny.
Mr. Burdy: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
83 ) Denied 1000-111-14-22. 1
Dominick L. & Pauline Segrete
c/o Koeppel Martone Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. English Jr. : Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
411 16 i
� 4
84) Denied 1000-113-2-16
Ms. Barbara Senia
c/o Santemma & Deutsch
120 Mineola Blvd. , Suite 510
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Burdy: Motion to deny.
Mr. Thorp: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
85) Denied 1000-105-2-1
Mr. Thomas T. Shannon
c/o Siegel Fenchel & Peddy, P.C.
777 Zeckendorf Blvd.
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. Burdy: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
86) Denied 1000-35-5-24
Mr. Angelo Silveri
c/o Siegel Fenchel & Peddy, P.C.
777 Zeckendorf Blvd.
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Mr. English Jr. : Motion to deny.
Mr. Thorp: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
87 ) Denied 1000-111-12-7. 2
Ms. Henrietta Silverman
c/o Santemma & Deutsch
120 Mineola Blvd. , Suite 510
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. Burdy: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
88) Denied 1000-63-7-13
Mr. Anton F. Skwara Jr.
245 Grigonis Path
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Mr. Burdy: Motion to deny.
Mr. Thorp: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
17411
89) Denied 1000-109-5-14.15
Mr. Robert Snowden
c/o Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Aveue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. Burdy: Second.
Board: Vote 3 for denial, one abstention.
90 ) Denied 1000-35-5-13
Mr. Howard C. Stabile
c/o Siegel Fenchel & Peddy, P.C.
777 Zeckendorf Blvd.
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. English Jr. : Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
91) Denied 1001-6-2-23 . 1
Sterlington Commons Associates
c/o Moroze, Sherman, Gordon &
Gordon, P.C. c/o Siegel et. al
777 Zeckendorf Blvd.
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Mr. Burdy: Motion to deny.
Mr. English Jr. : Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
92) Reduced from $9,900 to $7,500
1000-97-3-11. 3
Mr. Ronald E. & Maria Strain
P.O. Box 1504
Riverhead, N.Y. 11901
Mr. Thorp: Motion to reduce.
Mr. Burdy: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
93) Reduced from $11,800 to $10,000
1000-102-7-8
John P. & Arlene S. Sullivan
1760 Crown Land Lane
Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935
Mr. Sullivan: Declared interest and excused
himself.
Mr. Thorp: Motion to reduce.
• 18 •
Mr. Burdy: Second
Board: Vote 3 to reduce, one abstention.
94) Denied 1000-109-5-14. 27
Ms. Dorothy Syracuse
c/o Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
Mr. Burdy: Seond.
Board: Vote unanimous.
95) Denied 1000-109-5-14. 21
Curtis & Amelia Weber
c/o Robert A. Capasso
33 Monell Avenue
Islip, N.Y. 11751
Mr. English Jr. : Motion to deny.
Mr. Burdy: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
96) Denied 1000-103-5-2. 2
George, Kostas, & Ted Zachariadis
c/o Cronin, Cronin, & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Mr. Burdy: Motion to deny.
Mr. English Jr. : Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
97) Denied 1000-110-1-12
Cutchogue Harbor Marina, Inc.
c/o Michael Bender
45 Gazza Blvd.
Farmingdale, N.Y. 11735
Mr. Burdy: Motion to deny.
Mr. Thorp: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
98) Denied 1000-133-1-9
Mr. John Dinos
821 Boulevard East
Weehawken, N.J. 07087
Mr. Thorp: Motion to deny.
• 19 •
%
Mr. Burdy: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
99) Denied 1000-114-12-3. 1
Handy Pantry Stores Inc.
Flower & Medalie, Esgs.
24 E. Main St. , Suite 201
Mr. Burdy: Motion to deny.
Mr. Thorp: Second.
Board: Vote unanimous.
100) Reduced from $8,300 to $6,156
1000-110-3-16
Mr. & Mrs. Carll E. Butler
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
101) Reduced from $6,500 to $4,951
1000-38-5-5
Joseph R. & Joan Carpentio
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
102) Reduced from $15,400 to $12,960
1000-88-1-12
Louis Carvell
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
103) Reduced from $12,200 to $10,044
1000-114-9-14. 2
Robert A. & Deborah Celic
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
411 20 •
104) Reduced from $9,600 to $8,375
1000-100-4-9
Donald & Patricia Deerkoski
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
105) Reduced from $14,700 to $12,636
1000-145-2-7
Joseph & Eileen Farrell
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote Unanimous.
106) Reduced from $7,600 to $4,536
1000-74-1-37. 2
Robert & Marilyn
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
107) Reduced from $6,800 to $5,774
1000-30-2-7
Herbert & Joan Johnson
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
108) Reduced from $4,300 to $3,240
1000-41-1-26
Claude & Susan Kumjian
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
109) Reduced from $7,400 to $5,508
1000-15-2-4
Yvonne Lodes
c/o Tax Reduction Services
21
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
110) Reduced from $11,700 to $10,368
1000-121-4-26
Joan & Lowell Ryan
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
111) Reduced from $5,400 to $4,098
1000-70-10-13
Thomas A. & Christine E. Schade
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
112) Reduced from $8,200 to $6,593
1000-62-3-34
Roy A. & Joanne Schelin
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
113) Reduced from $12,300 to $10,368
1000-111-4-8
Peter F. & Patricia Schleipman
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
114) Reduced from $9,200 to $6,300
1000-108-3-13 .10
Brian & Barbara Sheehan
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
. 22 •
I
115) Reduced from $7,000 to $5,880
1000-74-2-34
John & Margaret Skabry
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
116) Denied 1000-78-2-42
Joseph J. Jr. & Doris Verwayen
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
117) Reduced from $9, 200 to $6,300
1000-112-1-16. 5
Joseph A. Wanat
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
118) Denied 1000-126-8-15
Constance Zahra
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
119) Reduced from $11,000 to $8,900
1000-106-10-28.5
Frank Zaleski
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
120) Reduced from $10,100 to $9,000
1000-78-4-32. 5
Mr. & Mrs. Bret Kehl
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
• 23 •
Board: Vote unanimous.
121) Denied 1000-31-3-11. 15
Michael & Pamela Acebo
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
122) Denied 1000-113-14-8
William & Arleen Amato
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
123 Denied 1000-51-3-14
Nick & Anna Andriotis
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
124) Denied 1000-37-7-9. 1
Thomas J. Aprea Jr. ( as trustee)
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
125) Denied 1000-125-1-2. 12
George Aydinian
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
126) Denied 1000-70-12-32
John & Linda Bertani
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
24 •
ti
Board: Vote unanimous.
127) Denied 1000-31-3-1
Mr. & Mrs. Peter Brounitzas
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
128) Denied Edward & Helen Brush
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
129) Denied 1000-54-9-6
Mr. & Mrs. Ronald Burk
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
130) Denied 1000-36-2-23 .4
Richard & Mary Butler
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
131) Denied 1000-115-15-22
Jack J. & Elisa Cecchini
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
132) Denied 1000-115-16-16
Nicholas F. Hilda
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
i 25 i
133 ) Denied 1000-53-4-45.1
Charles & Caroline Ciochetto
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
134) Denied 1000-37-1-5
George W. & Evelyn Clark
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
135) Denied 1000-70-13-20. 4
Joseph M. Cornacchia
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
136) Denied 1000-70-13-20. 5
Joseph M. & Vivian Cornacchia
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
137) Denied 1000-56-5-26
Mr. & Mrs. C. Clifford Cornell
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
138) Denied 1000-115-5-18
Robert & Barbara Constanzo
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
26 111
•
139) Reduced from $5,700 to $3,900
1000-75-2-18
Leopold & Celcia D'Mello
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
140) Denied 1000-33-3-11
Paul H. & Mary S. Dalecki
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
141) Denied 1000-7-2-1
Robert W. & Linda Daniel Jr.
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
142) Denied 1001-2-1-19. 1
George Dobler
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
143 ) Denied 1000-30-2-57
Deonisios Drakatos
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
144) Denied 1000-31-4-7
Athanasios & Stella Drenis
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
411 27
145) Denied 1000-84-1-6. 3
Richard E. & Virginia A. Dries
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
146) Reduced from $6,900 to $5,000
1000-55-6-15.49
Steven Dunne
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
147) Denied 1000-22-1-8
Donald & Peggylee Dzenkowski
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
148) Denied 1000-9-9-16
John C. Evans
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
149) Reduced from $3,700 to $2,600
1001-2-2-16
James Anthony Farley
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
150) Denied 1000-33-1-18
Mr. & Mrs. Antonios Feggoudakis
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
411 28 •
151) Denied 1001-4-1-13
Frank Field
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
152) Denied 1000-41-2-13.2
Frank Field
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
153) Denied 1000-48-3-20. 1
Frank Field
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
154) Denied 1000-33-4-21
George Figetakas
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
155) Denied 1000-75-6-9. 5
Joseph & Angela Fristachi
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
156) Denied 1000-70-5-2
Gerard Gaughran
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
29411
157) Denied 1000-33-3-14
Manuel & Irene Gavras
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
158) Denied 1000-26-1-21
Pierre Gazarian
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
159) Denied 1000-87-3-50
Royal & Virginia Gifford
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
160) Denied 1000-70-13-14
William J. & Mary Ann Going
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
161) Denied 1000-41-1-28
Christoper & Danielle Golden
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
162) Denied 1000-21-4-1
William & Artemis Gontzes
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
. 30111
163 ) Denied 1000-33-2-6
Terry Bobb Gonzalez
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
164) Denied 1000-54-7-18.8
Mr. & Mrs. Christoper A. Grattan
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
165) Denied 1000-79-6-14
Charles W. & Donna J. Gray
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
166) Denied 1000-109-5-27. 1
Wolfgang O. & Charlotte Grube
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
167) Denied 1000-36-2-21
Maria Grzesik
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
168) Denied 1000-106-12-13 .1
George K. & Edna Hammond
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
31 •
169) Denied 1000-41-1-25
Gregory Hallock
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
170) Reduced from $6, 300 to $5,000
1000-55-6-15 . 28
Melvin & Janice Hansen
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
171) Denied 1000-103-12-2
Barbara Haponic/Orlowski
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
172) Denied 1001-6-6-16
Alfred Harbich
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
173 ) Denied 1000-31-2-3
Michael & Ano Hartofilis
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
174) Denied 1000-9-9-28. 1
Nancy Hickey
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
• 32
175) Denied 1000-56-1-2. 19
Edward J. & Susan A. Hilyard
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
176 ) Denied 1000-100-3-10. 8
James & Claudia Hirsch
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
177) Denied 1000-102-8-17
Edward & Patricia Hudson
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
178) Denied 1000-26-2-24
Robert & Ann Hulsman
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
179) Denied 1000-115-6-8
Vito C. & Laurie C. Italia
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
180) Denied 1000-66-3-8
Edward P. & Marion Jablonski
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
• 33 •
181) Denied 1000-128-5-6
Robert Johnson & Margaret Feeney
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
182) Denied 1000-71-2-10
William & Anne Jones
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
183 ) Denied 1000-79-4-26
Mr. & Mrs. Thomas Jordan
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
184) Denied 1000-83-2-7. 3
Mr. Mrs. Peter Kalamaras
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
185) Denied 1000-79-7-22
Mr. & Mrs. Antonios Kapsis
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
186) Denied 1000-37-4-12. 1
William P. & Sylvia Kapuler
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
• 34 •
187) Denied 1000-33-4-39
Mr. & Mrs. Constantions Karavas
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
188) Denied 1000-30-2-62
Steve & Vicki Kasomenakis
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
189) Denied 1000-97-4-7. 2
Daryl & Susan Ketcham
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
190) Denied 1000-111-8-13
Matthew & Irene Klaritch
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
191) Denied 1000-103-14-13
Harold J. & Patricia F. Kober
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
192) Denied 1000-125-1-2. 19
Thomas G. & Theresa Kober
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
193) Denied 1000-26-3-2
• 35 S
Babis Krasanakis
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
194) Denied 1000-70-2-27.1
Robert T. Kroepel
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
195) Denied 1000-79-7-24
Sheila & Stuart Kube
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
196) Denied 1000-55-6-15. 24
John P. Kujawski
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
197) Denied 1000-109-2-12. 8
Gregory C. & Sophia L'Hommedieu
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
198) Denied 1000-32-1-6. 1
George R. Latham Jr.
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
199) Denied 1000-7-5-4. 1
110 36 •
Marc E. Leland as trustee
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
200) Denied 1000-102-8-2
Marc H. & Beverly Levey
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
201) Denied 1000-13-2-7.9
Ellen Ruth Levy
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
202) Denied 1000-63-7-25
Louis & Carol Levy
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
203) Denied 1000-12-2-10
Mary F. Leyland
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
204) Denied 1000-33-3-9
Salvatore & Loretta LoPrinzi
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
205) Denied 1000-102-8-1
37411
Gary M. & Linda M. Long
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
206) Denied 1000-108-3-8. 8
Michael Loring
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
207) Denied 1000-113-5-8
Wallace & Ginny Macomber
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
208) Denied 1000-20-3-9. 3
Daniel & Linda Mannix
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
209) Denied 1000-38-2-25
Mr. & Mrs. John Manoglu
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
210) Denied 1000-78-9-71. 3
Alfred & Rose Markiewicz
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
211) Denied 1000-125-1-2. 24
• 38
1
Mitch Markowski
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
212) Denied 1000-124-1-3 .1
Mr. & Mrs. Thomas H. S. May
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
213) Denied 1000-31-7-16
Bobby Mills
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
214) Denied 1000-124-1-3 .2
Kenneth Minnick
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
215) Denied 1000-70-8-49
Frances J. Mulhall
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
216) Denied 1000-33-2-30
Harry Mulhall
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
217) Denied 1000-33-4-25
. 39 .
Istepan & Sarah Muradyan
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
218) Denied 1000-114-4-1.1
Elizabeth & Francis Murphy
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
219) Denied 1000-85-2-5
Henry Oman
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
220) Denied 1000-33-4-12
Mike & Marika Pappas
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
221) Denied 1000-106-7-36
John G. & Katina Pappas
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
222) Denied 1000-122-2-6
Dorothy Paulos
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
223 ) Denied 1000-52-3-17
410 40 •
t
Luigi & Maria Perinuzzi
c/o Tax Rduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
224) Denied 1000-104-4-7
Julia & John R. Pesek
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
225) Denied 1000-95-4-18. 1
Joseph & Bernadette Petersen
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
226) Denied 1000-125-4-1
Helen Picinich
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
227) Denied 1000-22-4-6
Mr. & Mrs. Antonios Politis
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
228) Denied 1000-78-1-16
Mr. & Mrs. John A. Polywoda
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
229) Denied 1000-109-3-2 .11
411 41
Rita & Pierce Power
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
230) Denied 1000-121-1-4. 3
Joseph & Lee Pufahl
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
231) Denied 1000-36-2-11
Mr. & Mrs. Henry L. Quintin
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
232) Denied 1000-17-2-3 . 1
Mr. & Mrs. Edwin K. Reeves
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
233 ) Denied 1000-54-3-19
Vincent & Veronica C. Regan
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
234) Denied 1000-33-2-18
Mr. & Mrs. Achilles Renzulli
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
235 ) Denied 1000-33-2-18
42 411
Craig A. & Barbara Richter
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
236) Denied 1000-33-2-2 & 3
Gus & Konstantino Sakarellos
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
237) Denied 1000-109-2-18
Irene Sawastynowicz
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
238) Denied 1000-117-6-16.3
Edward R. & Sharon Schmidt
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
239) Denied 1000-40-1-9
Helene J. Schmidt
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
240) Denied 1000-35-8-3 . 3
Fred & Jenny Schoenstein
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
241) Denied 1000-35-8-3 . 4
411 4311,
Otto & June Schoenstein
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
242) Denied 1000-22-2-44
Mr. & Mrs. Stephen Schott
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
243) Denied 1000-144-1-24
Richard & Marie Schulken
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Board: Vote unanimous.
244) Denied 1000-9-10-12
Mr. & Mrs. J. Scott
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
245) Denied 1000-125-1-2. 23
Sally & Louis Scotto
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
246) Denied 1000-13-2-9
Nathan B. Seidman
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
247 ) Denied 1001-2-6-39
Bernard & Ann Shustrin
111 44 411
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
248) Denied 1000-115-6-30
Joseph B. & Mary Sieczka
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
249) Denied 1000-70-12-1
Renzo Simeone
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
250) Denied 1000-107-2-4
Gregory Simonelli
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
251) Denied 1000-35-3-4.2
Stanley Skrezec
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
252) Denied 1000-103-1-20. 8
Judith Sposato Hendrickson
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
253) Denied 1000-41-1-7
Robert Staples
45 i
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
254) Denied 1000-51-1-11
David & Cynthia Steinbuch
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
255) Denied 1000-33-4-5
Mr. & Mrs. Christ Stratakis
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
256) VOID
257 ) Denied 1000-141-1-29
Walter & Bernice Sujeski
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
258) Denied 1000-141-2-15
Stanley Swanson
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
259) Denied 1001-2-6-16
Jorge & Maura & Alicia Szendiuch
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
46411
260) Denied 1000-141-1-37.2
Mark & Lynn Tesser
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
261) Denied 1000-52-3-28
Nicholas Tzoumas
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
262) Denied 1000-38-5-4
Eleanor B. Ulich
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
263 ) Denied 1000-22-1-9
Joseph N. & Rhoda Vandernorth III
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
264) Denied 1000-107-2-14
Constantine & Magdalen Vloutely
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
265) Denied 1000-33-4-13
John Voiklis
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
• 47 •
,
266) Denied 1000-22-5-10
John & Marcella Volandes
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
267 ) Denied 1000-109-3-2.41
Linda Warren
c/o Tax Reduction Services
F.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
268) Denied 1000-18-6-24. 1
May Watson
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
269) Denied 1000-141-4-16
Edward & Bertha Wilcenski
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
270) Denied 1000-44-1-13
John Xikis
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
271) Denied 1000-44-3-1
John Xikis
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
• 48 •
272) Denied 1000-31-16-8
Richard W. Zatarian
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
273 ) Denied 1000-78-2-26
Atilio & Marsha Zupicich
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
274) Denied 1000-38-2-5
125-127 Main St. Corp
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
275) Denied 1001-5-3-18
George Aydinian
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
276) Denied 1000-45-6-4
Bostwick Day Co.
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
277) Denied 1000-84-3-1.1
Bob Hamilton
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
• 49 •
278) Denied 1001-2-2-41
Donald Katz
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
279) Denied 1001-4-10-31
Frederick Preston & Ors.
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
280) Denied 1000-53-5-12.5
James Sage
c/o Tax Reduction Services
P.O. Box 2111
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
Board: Vote unanimous.
281) Denied 1000-87-1-1-2
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Board: Vote unanimous.
282) Denied 1000-87-1-1-9
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Board: Vote unanimous.
283) Denied 1000-87. 1-1-10
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Board: Vote unanimous.
• 50 •
284) Denied 1000-87-1-1-10
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Board: Vote unanimous.
285) Denied 1000-87-1-1-12
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Board: Vote unanimous
286) Denied 1000-87-1-1-13
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Board: Vote unanimous
287) Denied 1000-87-1-1-14
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Board: Vote unanimous.
288) Denied 1000-87-1-1-15
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Board: Vote unanimous.
289) Denied 1000-87-1-1-16
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Board: Vote unanimous.
• 51 •
290) Denied 1000-87-1-1-17
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Board: Vote unanimous.
291) Denied 1000-87-1-1-18
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Board: Vote unanimous.
292) Denied 1000-87-1-1-19
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Board: Vote unanimous.
293 ) Denied 1000-87-1-1-20
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Board: Vote unanimous.
294) Denied 1000-87-1-1-25
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Board: Vote unanimous.
295) Denied 1000-87-1-1-26
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Board: Vote unanimous.
• 52 •
296) Denied 1000-87-1-1-27
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Board: Vote unanimous.
297) Denied 1000-87-1-1-28
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Board: Vote unanimous.
298) Denied 1000-87-1-1-29
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Board: Vote unanimous.
299) Denied 1000-87-1-1-30
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Board: Vote unanimous.
300) Denied 1000-87-1-1-31
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Board: Vote unanimous.
301) Denied 1000-87-1-1-32
European American Bank
c/o Peter H. & Hubert J. Brandt
350 Fifth Avenue - Suite 3610
New York, N.Y. 10118
Board: Vote unanimous.
• 53 •
302) Denied 1000-63 . 2-1-1 Through 47
Founders Village Condominium II
c/o Certilman, Balin, Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Avenue
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Board: Vote unanimous.
303 ) Denied 1000-63 . 1-1-1 Through 45
Founders Village Condominium I
c/o Certilman, Balin, Alder & Hyman
90 Merrick Avenue
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Board: Vote unanimous.
304) Denied 1000-63 . 1-1-47
Founders Village Homeowners Assoc. Inc.
c/o Certilman, Balin, Alder & Hyman
90 Merrick Avenue.
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Board: Vote unanimous.
305) Denied 1001-7. -16. 2
Pipes Cove Condominium Board of Managers
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
306) Denied 1001-7.1-16. 3
Pipes Cove Condominium Board of Managers
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
307) Denied 1001-7 . -1-16 .4
Pipes Cove Condominium Board of Managers
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
• 54111
308) Denied 1001-7. -1-16. 5
Pipes Cove Condominium Board of Managers
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
309) Denied 1000-49. -1-25. 2
Pipes Cove Condominium Board of Managers
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
310) Denied 1000-49. -1-25.3
Pipes Cove Condominium Board of Managers
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
311) Denied 1000-49.-1-25.4
Pipes Cove Condominium Board of Managers
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
312) Denied 1000-49. -1-25. 5
Pipes Cove Condominium Board of Managers
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
313 ) Denied 1000-49. -1-25.6
Pipes Cove Condominium Board of Managers
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
• 55
,
314) Denied 1000-44. 1-1-i
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
315) Denied 1000-44. 1-1-2
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
316) Denied 1000-44.1-1-3
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
317) Denied 1000-44. 1-1-4
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
318) Denied 1000-44. 1-1-5
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
319) Denied 1000-44.1. -1-6
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
• 56
r ►
320) Denied 1000-44. 1-1-7
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
321 ) Denied 1000-44. 11-1-8
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
322) Denied 1000-44. 1-1-9
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
323 ) Denied 1000-44.1-1-10
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
324) Denied 1000-44. 1-1-11
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
325) Denied 1000-44. 1-1-12
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
57•
•
326) Denied 1000-44.1-1-13
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
327 ) Denied 1000-44. 1-1-14
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
328) Denied 1000-44. 1-1-15
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
329) Denied 1000-44.1-1-16
Sea Breeze Village Condominium
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
330) Denied 1000-51.1-1-10
Board of Managers of Eastwind Shores Condominium
Association
c/o Reilly Like Tenety & Ambrosino
200 West Main Street, P.O. Box 818
Babylon, N.Y. 11702
Board: Vote unanimous.
331) Denied 1000-97-5-11
New York Telephone Company
c/o Murphy, Lynch Limone & Gionis, P.C.
P.O. Box 69, 1045 Oyster Bay Rd.
East Norwich, N.Y. 11732
Board: Vote unanimous.
• 58 •
IT
332) Denied 1000-51-3-3 . 19
Chardonnay Woods Homeowners Association, Inc.
c/o Murphy Lynch
P.O. Box 69, 1045 Oyster Bay Rd.
East Norwich, N.Y. 11732
Board: Vote unanimous.
333 ) Denied 1000-45-4-8 . 1
New York Telephone Company
c/o Murphy Lynch Limone & Gionis
P.O. Box 69, 1045 Oyster Bay Rd.
East Norwich, N.Y. 11732
Board: Vote unanimous.
334) Denied 1000-666 ' s
New York Telephone Company
c/o Murphy Lynch Limone & Gionis
P.O. Box 69, 1045 Oyster Bay Rd.
East Norwich, N.Y. 11732
Board: Vote unanimous.
335) Denied 1000-97-5-12
NLS Company
c/o Siegel Fenchel & Peddy, P.C.
777 Zeckendorf Blvd.
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Board: Vote unanimous.
335A) Denied 1000-127-3-5
Maureen Mooney
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C.
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
336) Denied 1000-106-6-13 . 3
Mattituck Holding Company
c/o Meyer Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C.
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
337) Denied 1000-84-2-4. 1
Marlake Associates
411 59
411
r I
c/o Certilman, Balin, Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Avenue
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Board: Vote unanimous.
338) Denied 1000-73-3-1.1
Marlake Associates
c/o Certilman, Balin, Adler & Hymann P.C.
90 Merrick Avenue
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Board: Vote unanimous.
339) Denied 1001-4-7-12
Mandel Family Corp.
c/o Siegel Fenchel & Peddy, P.C.
777 Zeckendorf Blvd.
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Board: Vote unanimous.
340) Denied 1000-101-1-5.2
L & R Vineyards Associates
c/o Koeppel, Martone, Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
341) Denied 1000-101-14.1
L & R Vineyards Associates
c/o Koeppel, Martone, Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
342) Denied 1001-5-4-31.1
Emanuel Kontakosta
c/o Podell Rothman Schechter & Banfield
160 Broadway
New York, N.Y. 10038
Board: Vote unanimous.
343) Denied 1001-5-4-7. 4
Emanuel Kontakosta
410 60
r
c/o Podell Rothman Schecther & Banfield
160 Broadway
New York, N.Y. 10038
Board: Vote unanimous.
344) Denied 1001-5-4-7 .2
Emanel Kontakosta
c/o Podell Rothman Schechter & Banfield
160 Broadway
New York, N.Y. 10038
Board: Vote unanimous.
345A) Denied 1001-4-9-28.2
Gusmar Realty Corp.
c/o Podell Rothman Schechter & Banfield
160 Broadway
New York, N.Y. 10038
Board: Vote unanimous.
346B) Denied 1001-4-928. 2
Gusmar Realty Corp.
c/o Koeppel Martone Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
346) Denied 1000-114-12-2
James L. Gray & Peter S. Gray
c/o Koeppel Martone Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
347) Denied 1000-142-1-26
Genovese Drug Stores Inc.
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
348) Denied 1000-61-3-7
Fleet Bank
61
} t c/o David G. Koch Esq.
170 Old Country Road
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
349) Denied 1001-5-1-17.1
Tullio Bertoli & Anthony Demasco
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein P.C.
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
350) Denied 1001-3-5-28. 1
Tullio Bertoli & Anthony Demasco
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein P.C.
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
351) Denied 1000-60-2-3 .1
Cutcho Corp.
c/o Certilman, Balin, Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Ave.
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Board: Vote unanimous.
352) Denied 1000-102-5-24
Colgate Design Corp.
c/o Lite & Lite, P.C.
239 Higbie Lane
West Islip, N.Y. 11795
Board: Vote unanimous.
353) Denied 1001-5-4-25
William F. Claudio, Inc.
c/o Koeppel Martone Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
354) Denied 1001-5-4-38.1
William F. Claudio Inc.
410 62410
}
c/o Koeppel Martone Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
355) Denied 1000-142-1-26
Alan A. Cardinale
c/o Certilman, Balin, Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Ave.
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Board: Vote unanimous.
356) Denied 1000-102-3-1
Nicholas Aliano
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
357) Denied 1001-4-10-5
The Bank of New York
c/o Farrel Fritz Caemmerer
Cleary Barnosky & Armentano, P.C.
EAB Plaza, West Tower, 14th Floor
Uniondale, N.Y. 11556-0120
Board: Vote unanimous.
358) Denied 1000-97-5-12
King Kullen Grocery Co. , Inc. #3
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
359) Denied 1000-34-2-1
Jordon' s Partners & Ano.
c/o Koeppel Martone Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
360) Denied 1000-122-3-10
• 63
411
,
Hodor-Staller & Kasper Bldg #170
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suit 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
361) Denied 1000-51-3-3.11
Harmat Cap Corp.
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
362) Denied 1000-120-3-8.3/8.41
Farmveu Associates
c/o Werner L. Adel Jr.
12 Fox Meadow Lane
Huntington, N.Y. 11743
Board: Vote unanimous.
362A) Denied 1000-121-7-1-15
Farmveu Associates
c/o Werner L. Adel Jr.
12 Fox Meadow Lane
Huntington, N.Y. 11743
Board: Vote unanimous.
363) Denied 1000-51-3-3.20
Chardonnay Woods Homeowners Association Inc.
c/o Murphy Lynch Limone & Gionis P.C.
P.O. Box 69
1045 Oyster Bay Rd.
East Norwich, N.Y. 11732
Board: Vote unanimous.
364) Denied 1001-5-4-7.3
Arc Enterprises
c/o Podell Rothman Schechter & Banfield
160 Broadway
New York, N.Y. 10038
Board: Vote unanimous.
• 64
365) Denied 1000-74-4-4
Nicholas Aliano
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
366) Denied 1000-59-9-30.5
Nicholas Aliano
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
367) Denied 1000-46-1-2.1
Nicholas Aliano
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
368) Denied 1000-87-6-12. 1
Airam Enterprises Inc.
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
369) Denied 1001-6-2-23 .1
Sterlington Commons Assoc.
c/o Moroze Sherman Gordon & Gordon P.C.
c/o Siegel et. al
777 Zeckendorf Blvd.
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Board: Vote unanimous.
370) Denied 1001-4-10-10.1
North Fork Bank
c/o Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Ave.
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Board: Vote unanimous.
65411
371) Denied 1000-60-2-10.4
North Fork Bank
c/o Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Ave.
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Board: Vote unanimous.
372) Denied 1000-61-2-12.2
North Fork Bank
c/o Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Ave.
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Board: Vote unanimous.
373) Denied 1000-102-6-13 .1
North Fork Bank
c/o Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Ave.
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Board: Vote unanimous.
374) Denied 1000-122-6-20
North Fork Bank
c/o Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Ave.
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Board: Vote unanimous.
375) Denied 1000-122-6-22
North Fork Bank
c/o Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Ave.
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Board: Vote unanimous.
376) Denied 1000-141-3-30
North Fork Bank
c/o Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Ave.
East Meadow, N.y. 11554
Board: Vote unanimous.
411 66
411
377) Denied 1000-141-4-2
North Fork Bank
c/o Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Ave.
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Board: Vote unanimous.
378) Denied 1000-141-4-3
North Fork Bank
c/o Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Ave.
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Board: Vote unanimous.
379) Denied 1000-141-4-6.1
North Fork Bank
c/o Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman
90 Merrick Ave.
East Meadow, N.Y. 11554
Board: Vote unanimous.
380) Denied 1000-15-3-17
Anthony Pirrera
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
381) Denied 1000-15-8-14.4
Anthony Pirrera
c/a Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
382) Denied 1000-19-1-12. 3
Anthony Pirrera
c/a Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
• 67 •
383 ) Denied 1000-35-4-25
Anthony Pirrera
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
384) Denied 1000-40-1-20. 1
Anthony Pirrera
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
385) Denied 1000-40-1-20.2
Anthony Pirrera
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
386) Denied 1000-55-2-20
Anthony Pirrera
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
387) Denied 1000-55-2-21
Anthony Pirrera
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
388) Denied 1000-113-12-15
Anthony Pirrera
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
• 68111
389) Denied 1000-83-1-12
Pond Enterprises Inc.
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
390) Denied 1000-83-1-13
Pond Enterprises Inc.
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
391) Denied 1000-83-1-14
Pond Enterprises Inc.
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
392) Denied 1000-83-1-15
Pond Enterprises Inc.
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
393 ) Denied 1000-83-2-1
Pond Enterprises Inc.
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
394) Denied 1000-83-2-2
Pond Enterprises Inc.
c/o Cronin, Cronin Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
s 69
395) Denied 1000-55-5-2. 4
Pudge Corp.
c/o Meyer Suozzi English & Klein P.C.
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
396) Denied 1000-60-2-4
Pudge Corp.
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein P.C.
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
397) Denied 1000-61-1-13 . 1
Pudge Corp.
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein P.C.
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
398 ) Denied 1000-61-4-22
Pudge Corp.
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein P.C.
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
399) Denied 1000-63-1-1. 6
Pudge Corp.
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein P.C.
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
400) Denied 1000-63-1-10
Pudge Corp.
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein P.C.
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
• 70 •
401 ) Denied 1000-70-2-11
Pudge Corp.
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
402) Denied 1000-84-1-26. 3
Pudge Corp.
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein P.C.
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
403 ) Denied 1000-118-2-1
Pudge Corp.
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein P.C.
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
404) Denied 1000-118-2-2
Pudge Corp.
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein P.C.
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
405) Denied 1000-118-2-4
Pudge Corp.
c/o Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein P.C.
1505 Kellum Place
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
406) Denied 1000-73-2-3 . 6
R.L.M. Realty of N.Y. Inc.
c/o Siegel Fenchel & Peddy P.C.
777 Zeckendorf Blvd.
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Board: Vote unanimous.
s 71 •
407) Denied 1000-51-3-3 . 21
Neil Rego
c/o Murphy Lynch Limone & Gionis P.C.
P.O. Box 69, 1045 Oyster Bay Road
East Norwich, N.Y. 11732
Board: Vote unanimous.
408) Denied 1000-60-1-6
Romanelli Realty
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
409) Denied 1000-55-5-7
Roosevelt Saving Bank
c/o Koeppel Marton Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
410) Denied 1001-4-9-23 . 4
Snargate Development Co. Of Gpt. Ltd
c/o Koeppel Martone Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
411) Denied 1000-46-1-2. 2
The Southland Corp.
c/o Wimpfheimer & Sherman Esqs.
1100 Frankling Ave, Suite PH400
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Board: Vote unanimous.
412) Denied 1000-62-3-37
The Southland Corp.
c/o Wimpfheimer & Sherman Esqs.
1100 Franklin Ave. , Suite PH400
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Board: Vote unanimous.
• 72411
.
413 ) Denied 1000-102-5-24
The Southland Corp.
c/o Wimpfheimer & Sherman Esgs.
1100 Franklin Ave. , Suite PH400
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Board: Vote unanimous.
414) Denied 1001-3-4-31
Tidal Properties Inc.
c/o Koeppel Martone Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
415) Denied 1001-3-4-47
Tidal Properties Inc.
c/o Koeppel Martone Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
416) Denied 1001-3-5-16. 2
Tidal Properties Inc.
c/o Koeppel Martone Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
417) Denied 1000-97-5-4.7
WMS Realty Inc.
c/o Siegel Fenchel & Peddy, P.C.
777 Zeckendorf Blvd
Garden City, N.Y. 11530
Board: Vote unanimous.
418) Denied 1000-21-6-1
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
73 1
419) Denied 1000-21-6-2
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
420) Denied 1000-21-6-3
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
421) Denied 1000-21-6-4
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
422) Denied 1000-21-6-5
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
423 ) Denied 1000-21-6-6
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
424) Denied 1000-21-6-7
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
425) Denied 1000-21-6-8
70 Marion Associates
41 74111
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
426) Denied 1000-30-3-1
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
427) Denied 1000-30-3-2
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
428) Denied 1000-30-3-4
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
429) Denied 1000-30-3-5
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
430) Denied 1000-30-3-6
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
431) Denied 1000-30-3-7
70 Marion Associates
411 75 S
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
432) Denied 1000-30-3-8
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
433 ) Denied 1000-30-3-9
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
434) Denied 1000-30-3-10
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
435) Denied 1000-30-3-11
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
436) Denied 1000-30-3-12
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
437) Denied 1000-30-3-13
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
411 76 i
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
438) Denied 1000-31-1-5. 4
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
439) Denied 1000-31-1-5. 5
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
440) Denied 1000-31-1-5. 6
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
441 ) Denied 1000-31-1-5.7
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
442) Denied 1000-31-1-5. 8
70 Marion Associates
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
443 ) Denied 1001-4-9-7
235 Mill Street Inc.
c/o Koeppel Martone Leistman & Herman
155 First Street
r III 77III
M F
r +
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
444) Denied 1000-102-5-26
808 Realty Corp.
c/o Cronin, Cronin & Harris, P.C.
200 Old Country Road, Suite 485
Mineola, N.Y. 11501
Board: Vote unanimous.
End of the 1993 Grievance Decisions.