Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-265 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK WETLANDS PERMIT This Wetlands Permit No.. 2..6,.5. ............ has been granted by the Town Trustees according to information furnished in Application No...~.,~..6. ........... filed by Applicant .G..1,.e..~...,.~..,.,..~..C.~,~t-~0g--q~,- ....................................... on ,..N..o.,v........2.¢., .......... 19...8.,.6.... A map of the proposed work will be kept on file in the Trustee Office under the application number given. Permit granted to do the following work ..,2..°..,.q.°.D..s..t,.z,..~..c...q..A.. s,..i,.~.9..i..e....~&.~..i...Z~.,.A.e.,.s,.i.¢.D~g.~.., .s,q ............................................................. Location of property on which work to be done ....... .~..i.g.~.~..&..~?.....D.~.i..-v...e.z, ..,S..o...q~..IA..o.,Z..~ ............... Creek, Bay or Harbor fronting property ..... .U...~..A.~..q~..D..o..~,..c} ................ ~ .............................................. Size of work: Length ....... .~,0. ................................................................................................................. Width 2~ ' Height Above High Water .... .2.,8..:.,2..[ .............................................................................. Depth Below Low Water ....... ..~./.,,A. .................................................................................. Yards to be Excavated ...........,.~./.A. .................................................................................. Yards to be Filled ................ 5.~.0...~.G~...~A .............................................................. Manner in which material is to be removed or deposited ..... ~p...]~.~.,J;),~p.~Ag~;...J,~..,~..,~z.~g9~, ....... Intended use of property ............... ]g~.,~£,~,~, ................................................................................ Conditions if any ...,(.s..~..e.,,.~..a..~.~...Q.~.,.~..e..;:~.~,.~..). ................................................................................... Expiration Date ~A~.`~;j~'.1~.~.~9.~'~..~WD~;~h~`~Q~;~GD~.~~ ............... Number of inspections' Required ...~.z.?.~..u~..s..t..~.~..~'..t"~.~.~'..~.1;~£~e~c~.~.~D~.~...~D~.~t1~ of ~he work. Inspection ~ees $-~.~.Q ........................................................................................................................... - Liability Policies in the Amount of The validity of this permit is or may be subject to the approval of other governmental or municipal authorities. The Town accepts no responsibility in applying for or obtaining such approval. In the event that such approval is necessary, the holder of this permit shall not commence operations here- under until such approval has been obtained in writing. The failure to obtain such other approval when requ red shall subject this permit to immediate revocation by the Trustees upon rece. pt by the Trustees. of written notice from such other governmental or municipal authorities of its refusal or disapproval. The applicant does by the acceptance of this permit, assume all responsibility for operations under- taken pursuant to this permit, and shall take all precautions for the prevention of injuries to persons and property resulting from such operations. By such acceptance, the applicant also agrees to indemni- fy and save harmless the Town, and its officers, agents and employees from any and all c~aims arising from operations under this permit add any and all acts or omissions of applicant, his agent and employees. The applicant and the owner and occupants of the premises upon which the operations authorizad by this permit are being conducted, do, by the acceptance of this permit, give consent to the Town, and it~ uf~ice~s and employees to ente~ dpon the premises where such operations are being conducted to make such inspections as the Town may deem necessary to insure that such operations are being con- ducted in conformity with this permit. This operation will not substantially: A. Adversely affect the wetlands of the town. B. Cause damage from erosion, turbidity or siltation. C. Cause saltwater intrusion into the fresh water resources of the town. D. Adversely affect fish, shellfish or other beneficial marine organisms, aquatic wildlife and vege- tation or the natural habitat thereof. E. Increase the danger of flood and storm-tide damage. F. Adversely affect navigation on tidal waters or the tidal flow of the tidal waters of the town. G. Change the course of any channel or the natural movement or flow of any waters. H. Weaken or undermine the lateral support of other lands in the vicinity. I. Otherwise adversely affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town. £ ' ,'~ President - Board of $outhold Town Trustees PROVISIONS OF THIS PEr'lIT: 1. That the cesspool is placed on the North West side of the property. Fill is to be kept at a minimum. Roof run off shall be kept out of the wetland area. Care is to be taken so as to preclude the entry of any construction material from entering into the wetland area by placing hay bales along the bank. 5. Immediately following construction, all areas of exposed soil shall be properly protecZed with suitable erosion control devices and/or vegetated. HENRY P. SMITH. President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER Vice-Pres. PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. ELLEN M. LARSEN BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P,O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 April 25, 1986 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Glenn F. Heidtmann, President Glenn F. Heidtmann & Son, Inc. P. O. Box 932 Cutchogue, New York 11935 Dear Mr. Heidtmann: The following action was taken by the Board of Trustees at their regular meeting held on April 24, 1986 regarding your application no. 336. Moved by WHEREAS, a permit Southold WHEREAS, Advisory WHEREAS, Trustee Smith seconded by Trustee Bredemeyer GLenn F. Heidtmann applied to the Southold Town Trustees for under the provls!ons of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of application dated November 26, 1985, and said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Council for their findings and recommendations and a Public Hearinq was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on April 24, 1986 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area; and WHEREAS, the Board considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and it is noted for the record that there has been no public opposition; and WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety, and general welfare of the people of the Town, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Glenn F. Heidtmann be and hereby is granted permission to construct a single family residence, with associated sanitary system and well on property located on Brigantine Drive, Southold, New York with the following provisions: property. I. That the cesspool is placed on the North West side of the 2. Fill is to kept tQ a minimum. 3. Roof run off shall be kept out of the wetland area. -2- 4. Care is to be taken so as to preclude the entry of any construction material from entering into the wetland area by placin~ hay bales along the bank. 5. Immediately following construction, all areas of exposed soil shall be properly protectad with suitable erosion control devices and/or vegetated. This permit is granted under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold. This permit will expire on April 24, 1987 if work has not commenced by same. There are two inspections required and the Trustees are to be notified upon completion of the work. HPS:ip CC: Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith~ President Board of Town Trustees Ilene Pfifferling~ Clerk Commissioner Henry G. Williams, D.E.C., Albany Charles Hamilton, D.E.C., Stony Brook N.Y.S. Dept. of State Southold Town Building Dept. Board of Appeals Town Trustees File BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Sonthold. New York 11971 S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL Date: DECLARATION NOTICE OF DETER~iINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE TELEPHONE (516) 765-1592 March 27, 1986 APPLICATION NO.: 336 NA~E. Glenn Heidt~mann This notice is issued pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, Notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Trustees, as lead agency for the action described below has determined that the project will not have a significant effect to the envirornuent. TYPE OF ACTION: Type II DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: To construct sanitary system on property. a single family residence and LOCATION OF PROJECT: Clipper Drive, known as Lot $ 66 on Map of Harbor on the Suffolk County Tax Map. Southold or more Lights, Section 3; particularly 1000-79-4-63 REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETE~4INATION: 1. An environmental assessment form in the short form has been submitted which indicated that there would be no adverse effect to the environment should the project be implemented as planned. 2. Because there has been no response in the allotted_time from the Southold Town Building Dept. and the N.Y.S.D.E.C.it is assumed that there are no objections nor com/nents from those agencies. Further information can be obtained by contacting Henry P. S~ith, Pres., Board of Trustees, Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, NY 11971, or by calling (516) 765-1892. BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 February 4, 1986 Mr. Stanley A. Pauzer District Manager Soil and Water Conservation Service 127 East Main Street Riverhead, New York 11901 Re: Glenn Heidtmann Wetland Application No. 336 Dear Mr. Pauzer: Transmitted herewith is a wetland application referenced above for the construction of a single family residence in Southold. The Board of Southold Town Trustees would like to have your assistance in this matter. Will you please make an inspection of the subject property and advise us of your findings and recommendations? Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. We await your remittance regarding this matter. Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees Ilene Pfifferling Clerk to Trustees HPS:ip Attachments BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 January 17, 1986 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Glenn F. Heidtmann P. O. Box 932 Cox Lane Cutchogue, New York 11935 Re: Wetland Application No. 336 Dear Mr. Heidtmann: Please be advised that the Trustees have reviewed your application and conducted an inspection of the subject premises on January 16, 1986. The Board would like you to furnish six copies of the site plan including the building envelope, septic system and well on the site. It has been requested to show where the septic system and wells are for the adjacent neighbor and the neighbor across the street. Your prompt attention to this matter will be greatly appreciated, as we would like to expedite your application, at the earliest possible date. If you should have any questions, or need additional information, please do not hesitate calling this office at the telephone number listed above. We await your remittance. Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees Ilene Pfifferl~ Clerk to Board HPS;ip cc: Building Dept. Zoning Board of Appeals Trustees Conservation Advisory Council File BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 725 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 January 14, 1986 Mr. Glenn F. Heidtmann P. O. Box 932 Cox Lane Cutchogue, New York 11935 RE: Wetland Application No. 336 Dear Mr. Heidtmann: Transmitted herewith is a Long Environmental Assessment Form. Please complete same and return to this office at the earliest possible date. Thank you for your continued cooperation in regard to this matter. Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith, ~resident Board of Town Trustees Ilene Pfifferling Clerk to Trustees HPS:ip Attachment cc: Trustees Conservation Advisory Council File BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main P. oad P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 January 3, 1986 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Glenn F. Heidtmann P.O. Box 932 Cox Lane Cutchogue, New York 11935 Re: Wetland Application No. 336 Dear Mr. Heidtmann: Please be advised that the Board of Trustees took the following action regarding the above referenced application, at a regular meeting held on December 26, 1985. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Trustees TABLE the Wetland Application No. 336 to construct a single family residence and to fill with 500 cu. yds. of fill on property located on Brigantine Drive, Harbor Lights, Southotd, pending comments from the Conservation Advisory Council. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate calling this office at the telephone number listed above. Very truly yours, HPS:ip cc: Trustees File BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, $3095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 December 13, 1985 Mr. Glenn F. Heidtmann P.O. Box 932 Cox Lane Cutchogue, New York 11935 Dear Mr. Heidtmann: Please be advised that the Board of Trustees took the following action on November 27, 1985 regarding your wetland application: Moved by Trustee Bednoski seconded by Trustee Bredemeyer it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Trustees declare itself lead agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in the matter of the application of Glenn Heidtmann for a wetland permit on certain property located on Brigantine Drive, Harbor Lights, Southold. Please note that the Board will be making their inspections on December 19, 1985 and request that you have the property staked for same. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate contacting this office at the telephone number listed above. Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees Ilene Pfifferli~lg ' ~ Secretary to Board BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 · Southold, New York t 197t November 25, 1985 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Charles T. Hamilton Alternate Regional Permit Administrator N~Y. S. DoE.C. Building 40, SUNY - Room 219 Stoney Brook, New York 11794 Dear Mr. Hamilton: Transmitted herewith is wetland application no. 336 submitted by Mr. Glenn Heidtmann to construct a single family dwelling, retaining wall and to fill on property located on Brigantine Drive, Lot 66, Harbor Lights, Southold. We would like to coordinate with you in our role as lead agency regarding this application. May we have your comments on same by December 16, 1985. Thank you for your input. Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees Ilene Pfif ferli~g Secretary to Board Attachments cc: Commissioner Williams Southoid Town Building Dept. BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 November 25, 1985 Mr. Martin Garrell, Chairman Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Southold Town Hall Sout~old, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Garrell: Transmitted herewith is application no. 336 for a wetland permit submitted by Mr. Glenn F. Heidtmann. . Please prepare a written report of findings and recommendations with respect to this application. Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees Ilene Pfif ferli~fg Secretary to Board Attachment BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Date: November 25, 1985 To Whom It May Concern: Attached hereto is a Short Environmental Assessment Form submitted by Glenn F. Heidtmann in connection with his application for a wetland permit to construct a two story dwelling, retaining wall and fill on property located on Brigantine Drive, Harbor Lights, Lot no. 66, Southold./ .. ~ ~ Henry P.~Smith, President--s- Board of Town Trustees Posted: November 25, 1985 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL The Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held regular meeting Wednseday, February 19, 1986 at 8:00 P.M. the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York. its a~ Present were: Martin H. Garrell, Chairman Heather Cusack, Member Jeanne Marriner, Member Ralph Condit, Member Betty Wells, Member John Tuthill, Member Linda J. Cooper, Secretary Absent was: John Holzapfel, Member Also present: Ellen Larson, Trustee On a motion by Martin Garrell, seconded by Heather Cusack, .it was RESOLVED to approve the minutes o£ the meeting held January 21, 1986. Vote of Council: Ayes: Ail Motion carried. Discussions: Martin Garrell suggested to the Council to schedule the next meeting at 7:30 P.M. Bob Villa o£ the Suffolk County Department of Health may attend the meeting to speak about septic systems, what's legal and what is not. Martin Garrell thought he would ask the Trustees to attend the meeting to hear Mr. Villa speak. Mr. Garrell also stated that there was a possiblity that Jay Tonski would attend the following meeting to discuss groin proposals. REPORTS: Betty Wells attended the 1986 Association of Towns in New York City and reported on a meeting concerning Land Trusts. The meeting discussed open lands and wetlands. The speaker stated that CACs were one of the most valuable groups in a town. Heather Cusack reported that Councilman Paul Stoutenburgh has suggested the CAC work on a handbill to pass out at the disposal area. The leaflet would discuss fertilizers, wetlands, dredging, etc.; subjects that constitute good behavior in town in regards to land Page use. Also suggested by the Councilman was an informational booklet be drawn up and distributed to the public informing of hazerdous waste and leaking underground fuel oil tanks. them Martin Garrell reported the group session Of East End conservation groups had been scheduled for Saturday, March 8, 1986. The session wii1 be held at the Southold Town Hall and will begin at 9:30 A.M. Invited are the groups from East Hampton, Southampton, Riverhead and Shelter Island. Steve Engleb~ight will be the guest speaker. An open discussion is planned for the groups to air problems and possible solutions facing the conservation groups~ Martin Garrell also reported on the Long Island Sound Study. · The Citizens Advisory Committee is planning a summer cruise on the Sound. It is a publicity function to let the public and politicians know about the LISS. Results of the first half year of data study will be available soon. Applications: Martin Garreli reported he met with Merle Wiggins of Peconic Associates and discussed the Joseph Schoenstein application. (Wetland Application No. 337) It was explained the "creek" adjacent to the property is actually a drainage ditch. The applicant plans to set up a brush barrier between his shop and the drainage ditch and will store equipment in the shed. The Council felt, in light of the information, there was nothing wrong with the proposal as long as the area is kept clean and the applicant follws through with his above stated plans. The Council discussed the Glenn Heidtmann application ( No. The Council will continue to table the application pending final resolution to placement of the cesspools. 336 ) On a motion made by John Tuthill, seconded by Ralph Condit it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval of the Wetland Application No. 339 submitted by the TidewaTer Construction Co. on behalf of Herbert Greenfield to replace 208 feet of - deteriorated bulkhead ~nd dredge approximately 120.yds. and deposit behind bulkhead with no return to waterway. The Council approves with the stipulation that the bulkhead along the inlet side be replaced IN PLACE an~ do not allow the 18" margin. The Council feels if the bulkhead were replaced 18" outside the existing bulkhead the inlet would become congested in the future. Vote of Council: Ayes: Ail Motion carried. Page 3 On a motion made by John TUthill, seconded by Ralph Condit it was RESOLVED to recommend To the Southold Town Trustees approval of Wetland Application No. 340 submitted hy En-Consultants, Inc. on behalf of Jack and Joan Donnelly ~o cons~ruc~ a 40' extension to inland end of existing groin which will connec~ ~o previously applied for retaining wall. Vote of Council: Ayes: Ail Motion carried. On a motion made by John Tuthill, seconded by Ralph Condit it was. RESOLVED to recommend to,he Southotd Town Trustees 'approvaI of Wetland Application No. 341 submitted by North Fork Marine Construction Co. on behalf of Francis W. Deegan to remove existing dock and move to center of property and build a catwalk, ramp and float approximately 84' in length. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion made by John Tuthill, seconded by Ralph Condit it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval of the Wetland Application No'. 342 submitted by J. H. Geideman on behalf of Elizabeth Hamilton to repair and replace existing bulk- head. Vote of Council: Ayes: Ail Motion carried. New Business: Jeanne Marriner stated that the League of Women Voters and Ruth Oliva of the NFEC has requested the CAC investigate Article 11 and 12 of the Master Plan Proposed Zoning and make recommendations regarding same. Heather Cusack will look into the matter. The next meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council is scheduled for Wednesday, March 19, 1986 at 7:30 P.M. at the Southold Town Hall. New applications ~ere discussed, :Due to the large_amount of applications before the Council, they were divided as follows: No. 344 - Heather Cusack No. 345 - Heather Cusack No. 345 - Betty Wells No. 347 - Ralph Condit No. 348 - Group Inspection No. 349 - Jeanne Martinet No. 350 - Jeanne Martinet No. 351 - Group Inspection No. 353 - Group Inspection No. 354 - Ralph Condit No. 355 - Jeanne Marriner No. 356 - Group Inspection No. 357 - Group Inspection No. 359 - Martin Garrell No. 360 - Jeanne Marriner No. 361 Group Inspection No. 362 - Heather Cusack No. 363 - Martin Garrell No. 364 - Martin Garrell Group inspections are scheduled for 3:00 P.M., Wednesday, March 19, 1986. The group will meet at the Southold Town Hall. -2- Copies to the following: Charles Hamilton, D.E.C., Stony Brook Commissioner Henry G. Williams, D.E.C., Albany Southold Town Building Dept. Southold Town Planning Dept. Southold Town Z.B.A. Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Aram Terchunian, Coastal Management Mr. Glenn Heidtmann Town Clerk's Bulletin Board Trustees file TELEPHONE (516) 765-180i Town Hall, 53095 Main Road~ P.O. Box 1179 South01d, New York 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL The regular meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council was held Tuesday, December 19, 1985 at 8:00 P.M. in the Southold.Town Hall, ~ain Road, Southold, New York 11971. Present were: Martin H. Garrell - Chairman John Holzap£el - Member Ralph ~ondit - Member Jeanne Marriner - Member Heather Cusack - Member John Tuthill - Member Linda J. Cooper - Secretary Absent was: Betty Wells - Member Also present: Mr. Newman - Application No. 330 and 335 On a motion made by John Tuthill, seconded by Ralph Condit, it was RESOLVED to approve the minutes of the meeting held November 26, 1985. Vote of Council: Ayes: Ail Motion carried. REPORTS: New York Department of State Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats Several members of the CAC attended the meeting held Tuesday, December 10, 1985 and Monday, December 16, 1985. It was suggested several o£ the local experts in the area be contacted and have them provide information to the group concerning locations of habitats of different wildlife and fish. LONG ISLAND SOUND STUDY representative Martin H. Garrell reported the LISS's request for proposals will be coming out soon for Fiscal 1986. In addition to a data base on toxins and eutrophication of the Sound, the most interesting study £or this area will be of winter flounder. The study will be trying to look at how flounder do in polluted areas as compared to the more pristine areas of the Sound. The study will look at the role of contamination to reproduction. The LISS is also looking at hard clams (surf clams) regarding ~age :,2 growth and contamination. DISCUSSION: ~; The CAC has requested dredging maps from John Guldi to see what has been dredged in the historic past, to aid the Council in their recommendations. The Council also discussed their desire to have a session or two with the new Town Board and Trustees to let them know what the CAC is doing, to discuss problems it runs into, and get the Town Board's and Trustee% interpretations of different difficulties. A possible topic at the session would be to check with the Town Board to see if the town would be willing to finantially back the_CAC in restoring areas that have deteriorated due to drainage problems. Chairman Garre!l stated he will contact Councilman Stoutenburgh in regards to the Councilman's request to have the CAC do an inventory of sewers and drains going into town waters. The Council feels this is an excellent project. It~ a simple · step which would bring dramatic results in easing the loading of local creeks. The runoff could be deflected from the creeks into marshes and use the marshes as a buffer zone. Heather Cusack would like a booklet or brochure put our for the lay person to understand, explaining what wetlands are; the towns rules and regulations concerning wetlands; and the reasoning behind these rules. Also should be included are aspects the home owner should be aware of, ii.e. effects of lawns and fertilizers on the environment. The Council felt it would make a worthwhile project. It was suggested Heather contact the NFEC to see if they have anything like that already. Heather will also check with other towns to see if they have similar booklets which may be used as a guide. Chairman Garrell spoke of organizing a joint meeting between Southold, Riverhead, East Hampton and Southampton conservation groups , possibly Saturday, February 8 or 15, 1986. He is also considering having a guest speaker at the meeting. APPLICATIONS: The Council discussed the Ted Dowd application (Wetland Application No. 319). A letter was written to Mr. Dowd after the last meetlng requesting his presence at a future meeting. Mr. Dowd responded that he was working in Florida and would not be returning to Southold until springtime. All questions concerning his application will be put in writing and mailed to him. Chairman Garrell said he would compose a letter presenting the Council's concerns. At the Council's request Mr. Newman was present to discuss his ~¥etland Applications (No. 330 and No. 335). In answer to the questions, Mr. Newman stated the bulkhead and pilings in Application No. 330 would be flush with the ground level with sloping on the outside. (Drawings show bulkhead with a drop off). New drawings will be submitted to the Trustees. Page 3 Mr. Newman's Wetland Application No. 335 was 'then discussed. Mr. Newman stated twelve pilings would be used for the garage, placement would be along the back wall, front wall, and down the middle. (Garage will also require ZBA approval.) It'was explained by Mr, Newman that the back of the garage was built on an old bulkhead and caused the garage to sink. The garage contains a washer and shower, new plumbing will go into the existing cesspool. RECOMMENDATIONS: On a motion made by Martin Garrell, seconded by Ralph Condit, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board disapproval of the Wetland Application No. 193A submitted by En-Consultants Inc. on behalf of Matt-A-Mar M~rina to construct timber docks consisting of: 4' x 35' catwalk (elevated a minimum of 3.5 ' above grade of marsh) and a 3' X 15' hinged rmmp leading to (18) 5' x 24' floats (432' overall) plus a 5' x 30' float and a 2' x 24' float. The Council fel~s the scale of the project is too large for that area and there was concern for the land owners on the opposite side. Mattituck Creek, Mattituck. Vote of the Council: Ayes: Nays: Martin Garrell Ralph Condit John Holzapfel Heather Cusack Jeanne Marriner John Tuthill Motion carried. On a motion made by Heather Cusack, seconded by Ralph Condit it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees' disapproval of the Wetland Application No. 315 submitted by The Land Use Company on behalf of North Fork Property Development to construct two 3' by 15' ramps leading to two 6' x 20' float docks which will be each supported by two 8" spiles. Then to dredge said canal to 2' at MLW an area 960 s.f. to allow pleasure craft to tie up to said floats. Dredged material will then be trucked to the Southold Town Landfill. The Council disapproves because the canal is too narrow for two floating docks. Also they feel the area cannot be dredged, its too narrow and the sides would fall in. The wetlands would be harmed. In addition, the area is a Black Duck habitat. Mattituck. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion made by Ralph Condit, seconded by John Tuthill. it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval of the Wetland Application No. 325 submitted by Costello Marine Contracting Corp. for J. Lane Curry Do construct 60' low profile groin to extend from existing bulkhead. Pre-fill with 60 c.y. trucked in sand ~'ag e of same granulation. Paradise Point Road, Southold. Vote of Council: Ayes: Motion carried. Ail On a motion made by Martin Garrell, seconded by Ralph Condit, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees d.isapprova.1 of the Wetland Application No. 326 submitted by Mr. Charles W. Bowman to create two 3 acre lots and construct a single family dwelling and sanitary system on each. Approximately 2500 c.y. of fill will be installed at the sites to raise the grade for flood plain and Suffolk County Department of Health Service requirements. Also planned is installation of two fixed docks leading to ramps and float. The Council's disapproval is based on a letter from Suffolk County Department of Health Services to the Planning Board stating ground water conditions are not conductive to the proper functioning of individual sewage systems. Goose Creek, Southold. Vote of Council: Ayes: Ail Motion carried. On a motion made by Jeanne Martinet, seconded by John Tuthill, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees ~pproval of the Wetland Application No, 327 submitted by Glenn E. Just of The Land Use Company on behalf of Ia~ 'Shand to construct a 5' x 15' fixed dock leading to a 3' x 15' ramp which will lead to two 5' x 15' floating docks. One of which will be set at a 45 degree difference to the other. Said float docks will be supported by three 8" spiles. 1460 North Oakwood Road, Laurel~ New York. Vote of Council: Ayes: Ail Motion carried. On a motion made by Ralph Condit, seconded by John Tuthill, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval of the Wetland Application No. 328 submitted by The North Fork Marine Construc- tion, Inc. on behalf of John Lang to build a new CCA timber retaining wall 18" in front of existing wall. Wall will be approximately 135' in length and about 6" higher than existing wall. Indian Neck Lane, Peconic, New York. Vote of Council: Ayes: Ail Motion carried. On a motion made by John Tuthill, seconded by John Holzapfel, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees ~pproval of the Wetland Application No; 329 submitted by North Fork Marine Construction, Inc. on behalf of Claeves Bahrenburg to construct a timber dock off of existing sea wall on south side of property, level with top of sea wall and out to edge of northern sea wall. West Bay Road, Orient, New York. Vote of Council: Motion carried. Ayes: All Page 5 On a motion made by Ralph Condit, seconded by John Tuthill, it was RESOLVED zo recommend zo the Southold Town Truszees approval of the Wetland Application No. 330 submitted by John J. Newman to construct 65' of bulkhead and 5' return bulkhead zo conzrol erosion, using $' pile, 6' on center, 6' sheathing, 8' vertical deadman, and three pilings ~o existing floating dock. Approval is with the following stipulations: 1. Submit a new drawing for the bulkhead as discussed. 2. Use hay bales between bulkhead and water to avoid runoff during construction. 3. ~ackfill on the outside of the bulkhead up to the top of the retaining wall and plant nazural vegetation on slope. Vote of Council: Marion carried. Ayes; Martin garrell, John Heather Cusack, John Abstain: Jeanne Marriner Holzapfel, Tuthill Ralph Condit, On a motion made by Ralph Condit, seconded by John Tuthill, it was RESOLVED zo recommend zo the Southold Town Trustees approval of the Wetland Application No. 331 submitted by En-Consultants, Inc. on behalf of Heagen Bayles To place szone rip-rap armor (1% per 1.f.) in front of 445± 1.f. of existing timber bulkhead. Smith Road, Nassau Point, Cutchogue, New York. Vote of Council: Motion carried. Ayes: All On a motion made by Ralph Condit, seconded by Jeanne Marriner, it was RESOLVED to table the Wetland Application No. 332 Submitted by Costello Marine Contracting Corp. on behalf o£ Helen D. Reiter. The Council felt the project would sufficientaly impact the wetlands and suggests the Southold Town Trustees request an ENvironmental Impact Statement. The CAC wishes to be considered an interested party and tables the application until hearings are held. The following should be addressed: · 1, Danger to the wetlands due to the dredging leading to under- cutting of the wetland in the extreme tidal conditions. 2. Disturbance to the wetlands during dredging and construction. Main Road, Southold, New Vote of Council: Ayes: Ail Motion carried. On a motion made by John Holzapfel, seconded by Ralph Condit, it was RESOLVED to table the Wetland Application No. 333 submitted by Eh- Consultants, Inc. on behalf of Dr. Vincent Claps to construct a dock with a hinged ramp and float secured by two 8" pilings. The Council will send the applicant a letter with suggestion for amending his application. John Holzapfel will compose the letter. End of Willow Point Road near Greenport, New York. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. Page 6~; ~, On a motion made by Martin Garrell, seconded by John Tuthill, it was RESOLVED to t'able Wetland Application No. 335 submitted by John J. Newman to drive pilings to shove up existing garage and add a second floor. The Council will investigate the matters of overloading of the existing cesspool, legality of a second story going against the covenants of his deed, and the possibility of disturbance to surrounding areas by driving 12 pilings into the ground. Sailors Needle Road, $~attituck, New York. Vote of Council: Ayes: Martin Garrell, John Tuthill, Ralph Condit, Heather Cusack, John Holzapfel Abstain: Jeanne Marriner Motion carried. On a motion made by John Tuthill, seconded by Martin Garrell, it was RESOLVED to table the Wetland Application NO. 336 submitted by Mr. Glenn F. Heidtmann to build a single family home. The Council requested a letter be sent to Mr. Heidtmann asking that he attend a future meeting. Brigantine Drive, Harbor Lights, Southold, New York. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. NE~ BUSINESS The next regular meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council was scheduled for Tuesday, January 28, 1986 at 8:00 P.M. at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York. Group Inspections will be made on Thursday, January 23, 1986. The group will meet at S0uthold Town Hall at 3:00 P.M. New applications were as follows: No. 334 - Group.Inspection No. 337 - Group Inspection No. 338 - Group Inspection There being no further business to come before the Council on a motion made by John Holzapfel, seconded by Jeanne Marriner, RESOLVED to adjourn the meeting at 10:20 it :was Vote of Council: Ayes: Ail Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Linda J. Cooper, Secretary Page 2 Wetland Application No. 335 JOh~ N~W~aH - Tab~!e. The Council feels it must table this matter pending ZBA approval of the two story garage. It appears two story buildings go against the deed and covenants. If ZBA does approve, then questions will be asked re: Cesspool capacity increase and loading re: Pilings If ZBA does not approve, then it is not clear if pilings are necessary. It is not clear that the garage is not currently safe - simply repair the cracks in the floor. Rip rap looks ~isound as is. Wetland Application No. 324 Arthur J. Buj~nowski - Table - The Council reinspected the application at the request of the Town Trustees. After another ihspection and being alerted that there were objections by neighbors, the Council decided to table the application pending a meeting of all those neighbors concerned in the surronding properties. They !need to find a solution to best handle the problem of erosion and e lOSs. The Council feels ,the property owners xpert in littoral drift to advise on proper place- / men~ //~etland Application No. 336 Glenn F. Heidtmann - Ta - Council has tabl~--~g ~ from the___~ ~ DEC regarding Freshwater ~tlands.- - --~ TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York ~1971 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL January 22, 1986 To: Henry Smith, Trustee President From: Linda J. Cooper, CAC Secretary At the regular meeting of the CAC the following recommendations were made: Wetland Application No. 319, Ted Dowd - The Council will continue to Table this application until they can speak with Mr. Dowd. Wetland Application No. 333, Dr. Vincent Clap~ - Tabled, the Council wishes further information before making a recommend- ation. Wetland Application No. 334, John Xikis - Disapprove, the Council feels the present wall is serving its purpose, there is no need for bulkheading. Also of concern is the severe impact on the downdrift neighbors of the proposed groin~ In additions creation of additional land to an existing beach is contrary to the existing wetlands ordinance. In conclusion, the applicant should leave AS IS, the stones and screens appear quite secure. The cove is sheltered from the northwest. ~etland Application No. Council sites four .follows: 1) Creek is about 2) 3) 4) 33T, Joseph Schoenstei~n - Disapprove, The reasons for its recommendation. They are as to be designated as a significant habitat. It is critical to vast freshwater wetlands and uplands as far north as Moores Woods. The setback is not observed with care on the present lot. Rubble fronting on creek and banks are already a hazard. The building can be sited perpendicular to current plan. Town ordinances are,already in question due to expansion of facilities and previous variances. Wetland Application No. 338, Albert J. Breneisen - Disapprove. The Council recommends disapproval because the pool,,is within the 75' setback requirement. The Bulkhead represents a severe alteration of the shoreline contour. Without the pool the retaining wall has no function. The Council suggests an alternative by placing the pool on the north side of the house. TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL January 6, 1986 Mr. Glenn F. Reidtmann P.O. Box 932 Cox Lane Cutchogue, New York 11935 Dear Mr. Heidtmann: At the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council's regular meeting held in December, the Council tabled your wetland application, which was transmitted to us by the Southold Town Trustees f6r a recommendation. The Council wishes to meet with you at lhe next regular meeting and discuss your application. Several points need clari£ication. The next regular meeting of the Conservation Advisory Council will be Tuesday, January 21, 1986 at 8:00 P.M. Meetings are held at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York. Please notify the Council's secretary, Linda Cooper, if you are able to attend or not. Thank you:.for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, Martin H. Garrell, Chairman Conservation Advisory Council By Linda j. Cooper, Secretary cD: Southold Town Trustees BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TO;~N OF SOUTItOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPH oINrE (516) 765-i892 IDENTITY OF APPLICANT__~.~_~.~_~___~-~_~__~¥~____~_~ --~.~.~_____PHONE NO_____ TAX MAP NO. ,~__~St'~ PHONE NO.__ ...... _~j, ~,_~_ _ _ ~_~ _~a~A.~ LOCATION OF PROPERTy FOR WHICH P~RMIT _~~~__--~___~. ........ ~~___, ..... HOME ADDRESS OF PERMIT APPLICANT IF DIFFERENT FROM AFORESAID LOCATION DEPTH BELOW LOW WATER YARDS TO BE YARDS TO SE EXCAVATED____ _~_ F l LLED .... ~:::X:~_~_~_~__.~_~: ................ WIDTH OF CANAL. CREEK OR BAY FRONT D~PTH AT ~OW TID~ AVERAGE RISK IN TID~ DISTANCE TO THE N~AREST CHANNEL___~ FT, A~ zoo, ~.~___ DESCRIBE ANY KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON THE PREMISE AGENCY DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION AND PROPOSED CONDITION OF THE PREMISES AFTER THE WORK .IS COMPLETED INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL SURVEY OF THE PROJECT SITE IF NECESSARY V _ ~...~ ~_~-~c _ _ _ _~_ £~_~_~m~,~_ _-~:~_~_ ~_ ~ __ WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, I F NOT THE SAME AS THE APPL I CANT . ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED THAT WOULD PROHIBIT THIS PROJECT? BOARD OF TOWN TRrJ'~EES -' ' ' ., TOWN .OF SOUTHOLD ..... SHORT FNVIRONh/Ir::NTAL As~F_s$1ViENT FORM Project Information (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. Applicant/sponsor J 2. Project Name ~New ~ Expansion ~ Modification~a]teratlon Describe project briefly: Initially gJ~' acres Ultimately %%~ acres [~Yes [] No If No, describe briefly [~Residential [] Industrial [] Commercial [] Agriculture [] Parkland/open space [] Other [] Yes ~No if yes, list agency(s} and permlt/approvals Applicant/sponsor name: PART Ill Determination of Significance [To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS; For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, importan'~ or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); [b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d; irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (fi magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that exelanations conta, in sufficient detail to show that ail relevant ~dverse impacts have been identified - and adequately addressed [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potefltialiy large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL LONG FORM EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. [~Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide here, and on attachments as necessary, the reasons supportng this determination: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) STATE OF NEW YORK )SS: AND SAYS THAT HE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS, AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THAT THE WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF $OUTHOLD, THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND S I GNATURE O'b'~ ~'~PL I CANT DAY OF ~'}L-~-f~y~y~/~.~7 ~ NOTARYUPUBLIC L~DA J. COOPER NOTARY PUBLIC, State of N,~w York No, ~22~C~/$~f~alk C~¢7 APPROVED "WETLANDS" PERMIT (CHAPTER 97) APPROVED "BOAT,DOCKS, WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER 32) DISAPPROVED "WETLANDS PERMIT" (CHAPTER 97) DISAPPROVED "BOATS,DOCKS, WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER 32) CONDITIONS, IF ANY EXAMINING BODY SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN COMPUTATION oF FEES Approved 2/27/85 .q BOARD OF TOW~ TRUSTEES TOWn oF SOUTnOn~ ~u~ol~ N. Y. H971 BOARD OF TO~ TRUSTEES LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF HEARINGS ON WETLAND APPLICATIONS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIV- EN that pUBLIC HEARINGS will be held by the Town Trustees of the Town of Southold, at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, on THURSDAY, APRIL 24, 1986 on the following applications for permits under the provisions, of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold: . 8.'00 P.M.- In the matter of the application of JOHN XIKIS submitted by Eh-Consultants, Inc. to construct 200' lin. ft. of timber retaining wail from cor- ner to corner of adja~c~at~etain- - iixg wail and appi'f~imately 10' in front of failing gabion wallz- Backffil with 275:~ cubic yards of clean sand to be trucked in from commercial upland source. Pro- perry is located on Middle Road, Sonthold. 8:02 P.M.- In the matter of the applicmion of DR. VINCENT CLAPS ~ubmitted by En- Consultants, Inc. to construct a dock consisting of a 3' X 16' hinged mml~ and a 6' X20' float secured by (2) 8" diameter pil- ings. Property is located at their end of Willow Point R.o~d~_~.~. Southold. 8.'04 P.M: In the matter of the application of GLENN'Zeta; HEIDTMANN m construct.-~.~ single family residence on perry located on Brigantine Drive, Southold. 8.'06 P.M.- In the matter offll~ application of BERNARI~'- KIRSCH, M.D. submitted'~b~I J.H. Geldeman to construc~a- bulkhead (110 lin. ft.) and (21~ returns. Property id located'~i~ the foot of 9th Greenport. 8:08 P.M.- In the matter of tile application of TENDLER submitted by J.l~,~. Geldeman to remove extstt.l~?~ bulkhead and to rebuild in location same dimension (102 lin. ft.) on property located 9th Street, Greenpom'~ 8:10 P.M.- In the matter of ffi& application of MARTIN FLORENCE GELLMAN to ea~ tend float and piling 10 feet in- to Mattituck Creek, and to replace location of spiles and float. Property is located on Me- day Avenue. Mattituck. 8:12 P.M.- In the matter of the application of ARNOLD BLAIR to replace within 18" COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK SS; Patricia .Wood, being duly sworn, says that she is the Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in said Long Island Traveler-Watchman once each week for ..................... ./..... weeks successively, commencing on the ........... /..~ ........ Sworn to before me this ............ .... day of ........ : ........ , Notary Public BARBARA FORBES Notary Public, State of New Yo~ No. 4805846 quallfled in Su~£olk Com~.ty Commission Expires~--~- ~/ 19 ~'~ / 155 lin. It. oI eXlSUng storm damaged bulkhead and extend return by 25' inland. Backfill with 500 cu. yds. of clean sand rill. Property is located on Mid~Tvl way Road, Southold. .~ I 8:14 P.M.- In the matter of the application of VILLAGI~; MARINE to construct appm~:~ imately 275' of timber bulkhe~/~ ator above the MHW line aiofig~ the edge of an eroded ban[.ol Backfill structures with appro:~-~ imately 100 cu. yds of clean san,:)' m be trucked in from upla~ source. Property is located ~B~ Bay Avenue, Mattlinck. 8:16 p mr= In me mapper 0x me, i; application of JAMES E KINC~ to construct a 40' X 12' docile. 4 X 20 ramp in Matutu%~ Creek. Property is located East Mill Road, Mattituck. 8:t8 P.M.- In the matter of the application of GOLDSMITH'S BOAT SHOP, INC, submitted by Costello Marine Contlacting Corp to replace, in kind, In place, 415 lin. ft. of bulkhead and to fill behind same-with [250 cu. yds. of fill. Proper~y is~. located on Main Road,-~ ~ 20 P.M: in the m~tte~'of ~e. Contracting Corp. to replac¢in- kind, in place, 180 lln. ft. timber bulkhead on'the North Side of Wunnewe~ Lag0on eh-5 tranca Property is located on Bridge Lane, Nassau Point,- Cutchogue. 8:22 P.M.- In the matter of the ' applicatoin .of Tovey Lesnikowski to ~onstruct 60' X~ 4' catwalk, 25' X 8' 20 X 3 ramp.~roperty ~s located on North~ Drive~ 8'.24 P.M.- In the matter of the application of Budd's Pond Marine submitted by Peconi~: Associates~ Inc. to relSlace and~B install approximately 600 lin. ft.. of bulkhead and approx 180' of:' retaining wall· Property ~located on Main Road,~ Southold. 8:26 P.M.- In the matter of-the application of Arthur D. Sarki- s~an submmitted by Lane Use Compan~ to reconstruct within 18" approximately 620 ft. of storm damaged timber bulkhead and a 50' return. Structure Mil be backfilled with approximately 3,000 cu. yds. of dean sand to be trucked in from an upland soume. Pro- ject is located at the fo~t of Marratooka Road, Mattltuck. 8:28 P.M.- In the matter of the- application of PHILIP. L. FRISCIA submitted by the Land Use Company to remove existing structure and to replace in kind and in place a new timber bulkhead to be 112' plus two 10' returns. Approximately 50 cu. yds. of fill will be remov- ed from the site. Property is located at 3030 Ole Jule Lane, Mnttituck. 8:30 P.M.- In the matter of the application of Consultants. timber dock X grade of marsh) end of walk will lead'S0 a 4' 24' floating "T" formation. Float 'will be held in place by (4) 8" pilings. Property is located on West~- i ' phaiia Road, Mnttituck. 8:32 P.M.- In the matter of ~e application of JAMES .MESKOURIS submitted by the Land Use Company to construct a 4' X 90' fixed dock leading to a 3' X 15' ramp, leading to a 8' X 20' float dock. Property is loefffed on Home Pike Road, M~tlituelt. 8:34 P.M.- In the matter of the application of MATTITUCK I~ET DRYLAND MARINA, ~C. submitted by the Land Use mPanY to constr~ct approx- imately 225' of fiberglass btilkhead and tO construct a lC X'~0' timber dock, approx- in~tdy 325' of 4' timber floats and 14 14' X 40' fl6at fingers supported by 47, 8 spfles. Bii ,l~khead will be backfllled with aP~l~roximately 100 cu'. yds. of cl'e~n sand. Project is located on l~figles Drive, Mattituck. ' '- ~8:36 P.M.- In the matter of the a~Dlicatinn of WILLIAM D. MeCABE to construct a garam (tinder) a bedwom and bmh (above the garage) and a deck to his existing residence. Property is located on Nortlffield Lane, Southold. 8:38 P.M.- In the ma~er of the application of Gus"rAVE C. BICKERT submitte~ by the Land Use Company to reconstruct within 18" approx- imately 105' of timber bulkhead and backfill said structure with appror,. 500 ea. yds of clean sand to be trucked in from an upland source. Property is located on West Road., Cutchogue. '8:40 P.M.- In the matter of the application of WINIFRED GUNNISON to co~truct a 50' X~3~ ramp and walkway and a [0' X 6' dock. Pwperty is loiated on Clearview Road, So'uthold. ~AII persons interested in said matters should appear ar the tifl~e and place above specified and will be given the opportuni- ty~to be heard. Comments may b~'~ submitted in writing also prio/to the date of the public hekring. DATED: April 7, 1986 Henry P. Smith President Board of Town Trustees . 1T4/8/86(4) c~awspaper, puotishaO at GreenporL in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk end State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for weeks successively, commencing on the day of ADrJ i Principal Clerk Sworn to beforeme this U~LIC, State of New York / _ /~ bna approximately 10' in fr~ont failing gabion wall. Backfill ~4th 2752 cubic yards of clean sand to be tr~cked in ~om ~e~ial upl~d C~ps sub~t~ by En-Co~. by (2) 8" ~e~r pilings. P~p. e~ is ]~a~d at ~e end of WffiowPo~t Road, Southold. appllcati0~ of Gle~ ~ F. Heid~ ~ ~ns~ a ~gle f~y resid~ on ~pe~ ~ on B~g~e D~ve, Southold. j ~ . 8:~ P,M.-In ~e ~t~i oftbe application & ~ard ~sc~ M.D. submittal by g. H. ~d~ ~n. ~.) ~d (2) 5' r~. ~o~ submit~d by J. ~b~ld in ~e lo~tion ~me db me~ion (102 lin. ~.) on p~ e~ loea~d on Greenpo~ application of M~ & ~o~ ~ck. constract a 40' x i2' dock, 4' x 20' ramp in Mattit-,mk Creek. Prop- arty is located e~a East Mill Road, l~a~ituck. 8:18 P.1H.-In the matter of the application of Gol~k~mlth's Boat Shop, Inc~ place, in k~ ~ pIa~, 415 lin. P~ 8:20 P.~-~ ~e matter oft~ ~d by ~o M~e Con~ac~g kind, in pt~, 180 t~ber b~d on ~e No~h ~. ~ope~ ~ loca~d on Cu~ho~e. 8~2 P.M.--~ ~e maker o~e 3' ramp. ~o~h loca~d on M~me sub~ by P~o~c ~ai~ng w~ ~ope~ is 8:26 P.~-~ ~e mater of the si~ submi~ ~ ~d U~ s~rm d~ber bu~ead and a 50' r~ ~ct~e ~ll foot of ~ka Roa~ Mattock. 8:~ P.M.-~e mawr of~e submi~ ~e ~d U~ Com- t~e and Approxima~ 50 m y~. of fill ~ope~isl~ at 3~00le J~e ~ Ma~ck. 8:30 P.~-In ~ ~r of the appli~fion ~or suh~ by En-Con- fo~ation. ~ ~ ~ held in place by (4) 8' pilings. Prope~ kouds submi~ ~ the L~d fituck. STATE OF IN EW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE ALBANY, N,Y. 1223~ December 10, 1985 Mr. Glenn Fo Heidtmann, President Glenn F. Heidtmann & Son, Inco P.O. Box 932 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Lot #66 - Map of Harbor Lights Section 3 - Suffolk County Dist. 1000, Sec° 79, Blk. 4, Pclo 63 Dear Mr. Heidtmann: The Department of State is in receipt of your letter, dated Novem- ber 26, 1985, regarding the above referenced property in the Town of Southoldo It appears, based upon the information submitted, that this De- partment would have no project review jurisdiction over the proposed use of your property. If, however, the~U;S. Army Corps of Engineers informs you that a permit is required from that agency, then the Department of State would need to review the application which is filed with the Corps. Should this situation arise, please contact me, and I will provide appropriate forms and other information that you may need. My telephone number is (518) 474-3642. Coastal Resources Specialist WFB:dlb DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ['JEW YORK DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 26 FEDERAL PLAZA NEW YORK, N. Y. 102;'8-0090 Regulatory Branch SUBJECT: Information request letter dated 26 November 1985 Glenn F. Heidtmann P.O. Box 932 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Dear Mr. Heidtmann: Reference is made to subject letter requesting Department of the Army jurisdiction in areas which may be fresh water wetlands. According to 40 CFR Part 230.3 (t) "The term'~etlands" means those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency or duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions." If the subject lot does not meet the above conditions, it is not within Corps of Engineers jurisdiction. In order to determine whether your parcel appears on the New York State Wetland Map, you should contact the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation on the Stony Brook University campus. Sincerely, Alex Lechich Area Manager Eastern Permits Section N~'~ YOPdl STATE DEPAP~!~]T OF ~P;I~Ob~TAL CONSERVAT~O~ ................ :'~"' P, egulatory Affairs Unit Bldg, 40~ ~UA?f--~oom 219 Stony Brook~ -~ 11794 (516) 751-79~0 February 26,1986 Mr. Glenn F. Heidtmann P.O. Box 932 Cox Lane Cutohegue, N.Y. 11935 RE: SCTM # 1000-79-4-63 Dear Mr. Heidtmann A review has been made of your proposal to: single family house. develop the lot in betas of m Location: S/side of Brigantine Dr., east of Bayview Road, "Harbor Lights" subdivision. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation has determined that the above project is: XX ?~re than 100' from Freshwater Wetlands, The Freshwater Wetlands present are tentatively mapped as less than 12.4 acres and have not been desiMnated by the State as having unusual local importance at this time so are not currently regulated hyi~fSDEC. The wetlands present are Tidal and it appears that you need to apply for a Tidal Wetland Permit. The~'efore, no permit under Article 24 (Freshwater Wetlands) of the Environmental Conservation Law is required. Very truly yours, Alternate Permit Administrator CTH:DD~:co's On a motion made ~'\ Ralph Condit, seconded bF~Heather Cusack, it was RESOLVED to recon~nd to the Southold TownT: =tees~ disapproval of Wetland Application No. 334 submitted by En-Consultants, Ina. on behalf of John Xikis to cons~truct 200 ! 1.f. timber retaining wall from corner to corner of adjacent retaining wall and approx- imately 10' in front of failing gabion wall. Backfill with 275~ cubic yards of clean sand to be tr ]eked in from commercial upland source. Proposed wall will be above spring H.W. Construct a 50' stone groin approximately50' west of east property line and pre- fill up-drift side with 40! cubic yards of sand and gravel to be trucked in. The Council feels the present wall is serving its purpose there is no need for bulkheading. Also of concern is the severe impact on the downdrift neighbors of the proposed groin. In addition, creation of additional land to an existing beach is contrary to the existing Wetlands Ordinance. In conclusion, the applicant should leave AS IS, the stones and screens appear quite secure. The cove is sheltered from the northwest by a natural point. Vote of Council: Ayes: Ail Motion Carried. On a motion made by Martin Garrell, seconded by Jeanne Marriner, RESOLVED to table Wetland Application No. 336 submitted by Glenn Heidtmann. The Council wishes to await notice from the DEC regarding Freshwater Wetlands. Vote of Council: Ayes: Ail Motion carried. it was On a motion made by Martin Garrell, seconded by Ralph Condit, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees disapproval of Wetland Application No. 3S? submitted by John Schoenstein to approximately 40 yds of fill for proposed building. The Council disapproves because: 1. The creek is about to be designated as a significant habitat. It is critical to vast freshwater wetlands and uplands as far north as Moores Woods. 2. The setback is not observed with care on the present lot. Rubble fronting on the creek and bank~ are already a hazard. 3,The building can be sited perpendicular to current plan, 4, Town ordinances are already in question due to expansion of facilities and previous variances. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion made by Heather Cusack, seconded by Ralph Condit, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees disapproval of Wetland Application No. 3SS submitted by Costello Marine Con- tracting Corp. on behalf of Albert J. Breneisen to install 110' upper retaining wail 30' above MHW, install 75' lower retaining wall 25' above ~W and install 20' x 40' swimming pool 50' above MRW. The Council recommends disapproval because the pool would be within the 75' setback requirement and represents a severe TOWi~ OF SOUTHOLD ER~VIRONM.E~TAL ASSESS.~ENT - PAt{T ?P~OJECT I I~'F ORZ~_~T ION ~. ~, ~ ~ .... '" ' ~.~0~ " "' ~, ~-~-cy~~- _. ~. .- ., .... . \ - l-."~; .-.-,- .... '_:...-' *~_ ............. ; ' ., ' ..-...'.4.. . ~ . .- -.: (Physical sat-'-!n~ a? overal ! projsc:, bo~h deveToc~ an~ ~develc~ed areas)'..~"......~.~:..... ~...: ....... ~.....~.~ ~':.. ":..~"~:.. .... ... "'"'. , _ ). ~neraI C~arac:,r of t~a land: Generaily unifa~ sIa~e .X . ~eneraily ~even and ~lling o~..tr~gula~ ~. ?~S~n: !and use: U~a~ , [ndus:r~ , C~erc!aI , ~uouroan ~uraI'-~ "' " 3. ~oc~l {triage of ~ject a~a: c~sJ ..... ; ........... '~' ' $. Approximate percenta.ce of proposed project site with slopes: 0-10.9 ~ lO-IS~ ~$ 15~ o? -. ' greater ~ ~. 7, Is project contiguous to, or contain a building ar site H~ted on the ~ational Register o?' H~tori~ Places? Yes ~ No - - 8. What is ~e depth to ~e w~ter table) .~feet ~ ~o~ ~ ~ 9. ~ hunting or fishing oppo~unities presently exist ~n the project area? ~ Yes ' )0. ~es project site cont~in an? species of plant or animal llfe that ts identified as threatene~ or endangered - Yes ~ ~o, accusing to - Identify each species ' Are tgere any unique or unusual land ?o~s on the p~ject site? {(.e. cliffs, dun~, o~gr geologiczl lo.aLiens - Yes ~ No. {Describe Is ~e ~ject site presently used by the ~unity or neighborhood as an open space or'~c~ation a~a - . Yes ~ No. .. .... ..: ..... ~ ~ . ....... ~._.~...- ~.....~...... ~es"~he present site offer or include scenic views or vis~s bown ~ be impo~: to.~e Yes ,~ Mo . -'. ~- . .- · - ~t~s ~i~hin or contiguous to p~ject a~a: ~j~ ~ . ............. . .-:- ...~ ' . ... ~.. - ...... a. N~ of stream and n~e o~ ~ver to which (t is Cribuca~ ,. 1~.Lakes, Pon~s, ~etland areas within or ~nti~uous ~ project a~a: ..~ . .~ : ........ 7 . ,~.. a. Ra~ ~ b. Size {in acres) "16. ~at is the dominant lan~ use ~nd zoning classificztion within a 1/4 ~ile radius of ~e project ~ngle f~ily residential, ~-~) and the scale of development {e.g. ~ story). 1. Phys~l di=ens~ons and s~le of p~ject {fill in dimensions as app~priate) a. Total contiguous acreage o~ed by p~ject sponsor t)~ - '' a~r~s. ' ...... : .~.J<-.c .... j:-'~'..~.~ b. P~ject acreage developed: acres t~itiatly~ acres ultimately. ~ '~'~ ' "~ '' --~. -~ ~,.. ~._. : -~ . C. P~ject acreage ~'r~ain undeveloped ~ ~- .. - ..... d. Length of project, in miles: ~j /~ (if app~Kiate) -. ' .......... e. If project is ~n ~pansicn c? existing, indicate percent of expansion p~posed: building squa~ fed age~ · developed acreage ~ ~. ~axf~J~ vehicular trips generated per hour d ~ _ (upon completion of p~ject) h. If ~sid~ntial: ~Je? and type o~ housing units: 11. 13. '~4. One 'F~ily Two Family Orientation ~efghbornood-City-Regional Initial Ultimzte If: Industrial i'otal height of tailest proposed~ structure Hul tiple Family Condominium Estimated E~pl oyment ~o~ munn natural material (i.e. ro~k, ~r~tc.) will be re~oved from the site - ~kl~t~ns cubic ya - ~Ow many ac~s Of vegetation {trees, shrubs, g~un~ covers) will be removed frem"s~-C-~(L~) ~ill any mature forest (over lO0 years old] or other locally-important vegetation ~e re~oved by this project) . Yes ,~ ~o Are there any plans ~r re-vegetation to replace that re~oved during construction? ,., )(, Yes ' If single phase preject: Anticipated period of construction months. {including d~olition). o% I~ multi-phased p~ject: a. T~tal umber ~f phases anticipated ' No. -- . - ~]]{i ~ I~F' b. Anticipated date of ccmencement phase 1 month year Cincludi~ ..'~°,. -'/~_n~ . demolition) ~- ¢. Approximate completion date final phase r~ntb y~ar. .. -, ~. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subsequent phases? ..- - 8. ~ill blasting occur during construction? Yes _J~_.~o .- '..-. -' ~umber of jobs generated: during construction ~ I after project is complete (~) . 10. Nu~er of jobs eliminated by this project ~ . - ll. ~ill project require relocation of any projects or facilities? .,. Yes X' Ho.. If yes, explain.: 13. 14. 15. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. a. -Is surface or subsuriace liquid waste disGcsal involved? ~ Yes ,Re. . b. Zf yes, indicate type of waste {sewage, industrial, etc.) ~_t~ o. If surface disposal ~e of stream into which effluent will be disobeyed Will surface eree =f existing la,es, ponds, streams, bays or other surface waterways be increased or decreased by prupcsaI? Yes X No. Yes ,~(~ ~o Is ~rejec: or any portion of project located in the lO0 year flood plain? ~, 8oas project involve disposal of solid waste? _ Yes ~ No If yes, will an ~xisting solid waste disposal facility be used? Yes Hill any wastes not ga into a sewage disposal syste~ or into a sanitary landfill? d. t Yes ~iil project use herbicides or pesticides? . Yes ~ ~o Will projectreutinely produc~ odors'C~rethan one hour per day}? Yes ~. NO ~ Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local a~bfance noise levels? Yes __~__mNO ~ill project result in an increase in ener~j' use? ~ Yes No. If yes, ~ndicate type{s) If water supply ts f~m ~ells indicz~e pumping c~paci~y ~. gals/minute. Total anticipated water usage ~er day__~ ~ qals/daT. " ' ' C. Es proposed use C~nsistanC with pre,ant zoning? ~ ., d. I~ ~o, (ndicat~ desired zonin~ , 26. Approvals: b. co Is any Fedora! ~ermi~ required? Yes _~ mo Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing! Lo'.al and Regiona) &pprovals: · ' · ' ' State Agencies ..- Federal Agencies IF. FOP~AT lO~GtL O E"T,~ IL~ -- City, TOM, Village Beard City, Town, Village Planning Soard City, Town, Zoning Board City, County Health Oepartm, enc Other )ooal agencies Other regional agencies Approval Recuired (Date) Attach any additional infor~etian.as m~y b~ needed t~ clarify your project. If there are or may be any odverse impac=s associated with the proposal, please discuss such impact~ and the measures ~hic~ can be taken tu mitiga~.e or avoid t~m. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD E%TVIROATMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART PROJECT IMPA,CT$ AND THEJ2R FLAgNITUL1E General ~nformation (Read Carefully) - In completing the form the reviewer should be guided ~y the question: Have my decisions and' determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expecte= =o b~ a~ expert environmental analyst. - Identifying that an effect will be ootantially la~ {column ~} does not ~ean that it is also necessarily sionificant. Any large effect ~ust be evaluated in PA~i 3 to dateline s~nificance. ~y.identifying an 'effect in colu~n 2 simply asks that it be looked ac further. - - The Exa~nles orovided are to ~ssist the revie~e~ b7 showing types of effects and wherever oossible the th~esho' of magn~tuue t~a~ would t~i~ge~ a ~s~onse in cotton ~. The ex~oles are generally applicable throughout the State ann fo~ ~st situations. )ut, fo~ any soeciflc prujec= or siva o~ne~ ex,plat and/or lowe~ thresholds ~y be =ore appropriate for a Potential Large I~ac~ ratinQ. - ~ach o~je~t, on ea~ sit~, in e~ch 'locality, ~ill vary. ~erefore, the exa~oles have been offered as' ~uidanc ~ey do not constitute an exhaustiv~ list of impact~ and thresholds to answer each question. - The number of examoles per questio~ does not indicate th~ impotence of each question. Answer Ye~s if there will be any effect. ~evbe answers should be considered as Yes answers. If answering Yes to a euestion then check the a=orooriate oox (colum~ 1 or 2) to indicate the ~otential size of the imnact. If imoac~ threshold equals or exceeds any examole provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than examoie, check col~n 1. If reviewer has doubt aoouc the size of the impact ~leu_ consider the imoact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. If a potentially large impact or effect c~n be r ..... d by a change in the oroject to a less tSan large magnitude, place a Yes in column 3. A No response indicates tmat such a reduction is no: possible. i. INSTRUCTIONS (Read Carefully) a. A~swer each of the 18 euestions in PART 2. b. S)~ALC TO POTE~t~IAL CA;; IHPACT BE MOOEPJkTE LARGE REDUCED IMPACT DiPACT PROJE~ I~PA~ ON LA:;O - N0 YES - Examoles that ~ouId Apply to Column 2 ~Any construction on slopes of l~: er greater, (l~ foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where :ne general slopes in the project a~ea exceed 10%. Donst~dctien on kand where the death ~o the water table is less than 3 feet. ~OCOnstrqcticn of oared oarkinq arum for l,SG~ or ~¢re_ vehicles. within 3 feet of existing ground surface. Cons{ruction that will continue for more than 1 'year or involve tons of natural material {i.e. roc~ or soil) per year. Construction of ~y new sanitary landfill. WILL THERE BE Mt EFFECT AS A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL C~q:;GE TO PROJECT SITE? ~--~ Conetruc[ion in a designated floo~ay. '~)Other impac:s: ~0 YES WILL TI~ERE BE AN EFFECT TO A~;Y UNIQUE OR ~?;USUAL L~,NO FOPJ~Sy~C~'~ FOUN~ O~l THE SITE? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, ~eological forma- ~ ~ tiens, etc.) v Specific l~nd forms: Il!PACT O~ WATER NO YES WILL PROJEC~ A~FEC~ A~;Y WATE~ BODY DESi~ATED AS PROTECTED? (Under Articles 15, 2¢. 2~ of the Envir- onmental Conservation Law, Exemmles tmat ~ould Apply to Column ~ ~Oredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected .~ C~nstruction in a designated fres~ater or tidal wetland. L ' ~. WILL PROJECT AFFE~A~iY)IO~I-PROTECTED EXlSTI),~ OR NEW NO YES Ex,moles that Would Apply~ Column 2 ~ A 10% increas~ or decrease in the suvaco area of ~ny bod~ ~Constructlon of a body of wa:er ~at exceeds lO acres ~ Other impacts: NO YES WILL PROJECT AFFECT SU~FXC~ OR G~OU)~D~TE~ QUALi~? Examples :hat ~)ould Apply tm Col~ 2 ~ P~jett will ~quire a discha~e pe~it. ~ P~ject requi~s use of a sourc~ of w~ter that does not have approval to serve p~posed P~ject r~euires w~te~ suooly from wells with than 45 gallons oar minute pumping capacity. ~ Const~ction or ooermti~n oausing any contamination of a public water supply syssem. P~jec~ will adversely ~ffect g~unowacer. ~ L~ouid effluent will be conveyed off the site :0 Projecc~equiring a facility that would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per may. ~P~ject will likely caus~ siltation or other discha~e into an existing body of wa~r ~o the e~t~nt that tmere ~ODEP~ATE T*'IPACT m LARGE m REGUC.FD Other Impacts: , . WILL PROJECT ALTER DP. AINAGE FLOTI. PA~?EP,qS OR SC,qFJCE !,IATER 20 YES RU,(OFF. £x~mole that Would Apply to Colum~ 2 Project would impede flood water rqews. Project is likely to cause substantial erosion. Project is incomoatible with existing drainage patterns. ~k~_ Oth?impacts: );O YEI WILL P~OOECT AFFECTAI, Q,ALiTY? ........ '...: ............... (~ ('~ Examoles that l.lould Apply to Column 2 Project will induce 1.0gO or mo~ vehicle ~ries in any given hour. Project will result in the incineration of mom than 1 ton Project emission rate of all contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. get hour or a he~t source producing more than lO million BTU's per hour. ~.~)Other impacts: L~P~CT O,S' PL?IT$ ~HD ~qT;'AL$ . ,~(0 YES WILL PROJECT AFFECT AIiY THREAded(cD OR F~IDA~GER~ SPECIES? ,Examples thaC WcuId A~oly ~o C~l~ 2 Reduction of one or mo~ snecies listed on the ~ew York or Federal lies. using the stte. over or near site or found on the site. '- Removal of any portion of a critical er significant wild- life habitat. A~lication of Pesticide or he~icide over mire than Other lmpacos: .U.S ,.,, ,ALLf AFFiX. CT :[O~'i-T?,,REATE~i~ ~q )tO YE~ cNu~,,Gc~,E3 SPECIES? ............ Exammle that ',Iould Apply to Column 2 Project would substantially interfere wicn any resident or ~gratqry fis~ or wildlife s~ec~es. ~iIALL TO POTFJXITIAL CA~I IIIPACT .10 DERATE LARGE REDUCED BY IMPACT I)~PACT PRQ~) EOT CHA~IGE [-- Examples that Would Apply to ¢o]um, n Z Am iecomoatible visual affect caused by the introduction surrounding landsEape. ~A project easily visible, not easily screened, that Ts obviously different from others aroun: it. Project will result in the elimination or major ~Other impacts: I~P~TONHt~ORICRESOURC~ WILL PROJECT INPACTANY SIT, O, STRUC~RE OFHISTOR!C. NO YES Examntes that l~oul~ Apply to ~l~n 2 Project occurino wholly or partially within or contiguous to any facility or site listed on the National Ragister of_ historic place~. ~y imoact ~o an archeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. .. Other impacts: I~slPAC~ ON OPEN SPACE & REC~EATTO.N 12. WILL I'HE PROJECT AFFECT it4E OUANTITY OR OUAL!~ OF_=IIoT.~4G )lO YES OR ~TUR~ OPE~ SPACE~ OR REC~TiONAL OPPQE~JNITIES~ ...... ~ ~ Examoles that Would Apply to C~I~ 2 ~ ~e pe~nent foreclosure of a future rec~ationat oppo~unity. ~ A major mduc:io: of an open space i~ortant to the co.unity. ~jO Other impacts: 13. Examoles that ~ould Apply to Column 2 and/or gooda. ~.~.~) Project w(ll resuI~ )n severe traffic problems. IMPACT A~l TEANSPORTATTO~I WILL THE~E BE All EFFECT TO EXISTENG ~RANSPDRTATiON SYSTD"S? ............................................. ~ OtherJm:acts: ~,OOEPATE NO YES ~ NO YES POTE~ITiAL LARGE IMPACT CA;~ St!PACT REDUCED PR~Eul C..A~ 14. Exemoles thet Would Apply to Column 2 ~J([~Project causing greater then ~ increase in any ?or~ o? energy used in mun~cipati Project recurring the oreetion or extension Of an energy %rensmission or sumoly system co serve more then 50 single or :eo family residences. Other impacts: 15. WILL ~4ERE 8Z 08JECTIO?~AgLE OOOR5o NOISE. GLARE, V!E~ATION or ~ECTRICAL OISTU2~A~C~ AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT? .... Exe~eles that Would ~poly to Column 2 )~Blastine within 1.500 feet of a hosoit~l, school cr other sensitive facility. ~Odo~ will occur ~utinely (~re than one hour per day}. Project will produce operating noise exceeding the local amJient noise levels for noise outside of se~Jclures. Project will remove natural barriers that would acs ~s ~ no~se screen. Other impacts: IMPACT OPE HEA~TH & ~AZ~PDS NO YES P OEC PECT ^.o ............ ~xemnle~ that Would Apply to Column 2 ~'Project will ceuse e risk of ex~losien er release ef h~zardnus substances (i.e. oil, ~esticides, chemicals, redietion, etc.} in the ~vent of accident or uosec conditions, or there will be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. ~Projecc that will result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" {i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive. Padioacsive, irritating,' infec=ious, etc., (ncludin~ wass~s t~a~ are solid, semi-solid. liquid or ~ S~or~e facilisies lek one million or more gaIlo~s of liquified natural ~as or ot~er lieuids. '~Qtner imoects: SMALL TO POTE~(TIA[ C~. !MPACT':E" ~DEP. AT~ LA, RGE REDUCED BY IMPACT ' I;IPACT PROJECT CHA;.IGE -g. }Jo WILL PP, OJECT AFFECT THE CHARACTER ~F THE EXISTi~IG ~JO YES JJ Examole that Would Apply to Column 2 The oopuletion of the City, Town or Village in which the project ia located is likely to grow by ,,,~re cnan 5~ o~ resident human population. The municipal budgets for caoital expenditures or opera- ting services will increase by more than 5~ per year as a r~sult of this project. Will involve any ~eFm, enen: facility of a non-agricultural use in an agricultural district or remove prime agricultural lands from cultivation. The project will replace er eliminate existing facilities, Strictures or areas of histeric imporeance to the com~,.qnity. Development ~ill induce an influx of a particular age group with special neees. ~'--~Project will set an impor~Jnt precedent for future projec:a, Project will relocate 15 or more employees in one or more businesses. Other impact~: 18. NO ' YES IS ~ ,cRE PUBLIC CDNT~OVERS¥ CO~CER~iI?4G THE P~QJECT? £x:-motes that Woqld A~ply to Col~q~ 2 Either government or citizens o. adjec_nt co.unities have expresseo opposition or rejected the ~rejec: or nave not been contacted. Objections to the project from within the co.unity. '1 IF A~;Y ACTIO)I IN PART 2 IS IDE,qTIFIED AS A DETE.~HI~IATION POTE~(T!AL LA)tGE I~PACT Oil. IF YOU C~. ,,uT DETEPJ4I~IE THE MAG~I!?dDE OF [~4~ACT, PROCEED TO PART 3. PORTIO[tS OF r. AF CO.qPLEED FOR T'RIS PROJECT: PART I '%C : PART Il ~ PART 3__ Umon review of the information recorded on this FAF (Parts 1, 2 and 3) and considerin~ both the magnitude and inmortance of each impact, it is Keasonably determined that: (~The or. jeer will resul~ in no major imoacts and. therefore. is one which may no: cause slgnificanC oamage to the enrichment. B. Although tme project could have a significant effect on the envlr~nment, there will no: be a signlflcant effect in this casa =ecagse toe mitigation measures ~escrlbeo in PART 3 hsve been iocluoed as parc o~ the orooosee ?o3eco. C. The srojecc will result i~ one o~ more major adverse imoaccs that cannot be reouceo and may cause significant ~amage to Da ~e ~>~ ~ Cy.~._~_ - ~rep~er ~if~ifferen: from {~gpons~ale officer) Signature PRE~ARE A h'EGATIVE OECI. qRATIOI( PP. EPARE A NEC~ATIVE DEC~CRATIO~; © PREPARE POSITIVE gECLARATIO~{ PROCEED © Signature of Responsible Official Agency Print or type name of ~espons~ble offic in le~d Agency TOWN OF $OUTHOLD ESTVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART Iii EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS - Part 3 is prepared if one ormore impact or effec~ is considered to be potentially large. The amount of writing necessary to answer Part 3 may be determined by answering the question: In briefly completing the instructions below nave I mlaced in t~is record sufficient information co indicate :ne reasonableness of my decisions? IXSTP, UCTI0tI$ Complete the following fqr each impact ur effect identified in'r.~lumn 2 of Part 2: Z. Describe (if applicable) how the impact might be mitigated or reduced to a Tess than iarge impact by a pro- 3. 8used on the info~acion available, decide if iv is reasonable to cQnclude that Chis i~act to the minicipality (city, town Qr village) in ~hicn the project is located. ~- ~ probab~l~ of the ~mpac: or effect occurring ~- The dur~tion of ~ i~act or mffec~ ~ I~ ~rr~versib~lity, ~mclu~ng pe~nen~ls los: r~sources or ~- Whet~r the impac~ or effect can be ~ - Its potential divergence fro~ local needs ~Ad ~oals ~ - Whether known objections to the p~ject a~ply Co this impa~t or effect. DETERMINATION OF SI~)tFICA}ICE An action is considered to be significant if: One (or zore) imoac: is determined to both large and its (their) c~nseeuence, based on the PART III STAT~4E?ITS (Continue on Attachmam:s, as needed] Hight (~,16) 765,1128 GLENN F. HEIDTMANN & SON, INC. BUILDER COX LANE, CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 MAIL ADDRESS P,O, BOX 922 C. UT_CH~ OG_UE, N_ Y, November 26, 1985 Local Tidal'Wetlands Permit Administration Department of Environmental Conservation Stony Brook, New York 11794 Re: Lot 466 - Map of Harbor Lights Section 3 - Suffolk County Dist. 1000 - Sect. 79 - Block 4 - Pcl. Southold, New York Dear Sir: 63 We have purchased the above property in the Town of Southold, Location as per attached survey. A seasonml wet area is located on the rear of this lot, 102 feet from the front (street) property line. During wet spring or late fall seasons there is an accumulation of run off water, that drains into this low area. The Town of Southold has instructed us to contact you before they can issue a Building Permit. The intended use is for a single family dwelling. Is this parcel under your jurisdiction or does it appear on New York State wet land map? Please advise and forward all proper applications. Enclosed please find copy of survey. Sincerely,. Glenn F. ~ President GFH/rh Eric. PERMIT REQUIRED No person shall place any piles, stakes, Duoys, piers,- docks, bulkheads or other objects in or on any town waters or public lands under or adjacent to town waters in the Town of Southold, 'nor shall any person remove any sand, gravel or other materials from lands under town waters in the Town of Southold, without first obtaining a permit therefor from the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold. BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES MAIN ROAD SOUTHOED, NEW YORK &1971 765 -'1892 Other government agencies that may have jurisdiction and whose approval may be required for any activity mentioned above are listed belcw for your guidance. Coastal Managa~nt Program 162 Washington Ave'. Albany, New York 12231 Local Tidal Wetlands Permit Administrator Department of Environmental Conservation Stony Brook, New York 11794 751 - 7900 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 313 West Main Street Riverhead, New York 11901 727 - 4257 SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PETER f. COHALAN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE February 18, 1986 STANLEY A. PAUZER DISTRICT MANAGER Mr. Henry P. Smith, President Bogrd of Town Trustees Tox~ of Southold, Town Hall P.O. Box 728 Sout~hold, New York 11971 I am fozwarding, to you a report written by Allen Co~ell, USDA, Soil Conservation Service on the -'GI~ Heid~,~'~ Wetland Application No. 336", as you requested. If you need any ftm-ther information or if you have any questions on this report please contact mm. Very truly yours, Stanley A. Pauzer District Manager enC 127 EAST MAIN STREET RIVERHEAD, NEW¥ORK~1901 {516) 727-2315 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERV1CE 127 East Fain Street, Riverhead, New York 11901 February 18, 1986 Ms, Stanley A, Pauzer, District Mm~ager Suffolk County Soil and Water Conservation .District 127 East Main Street, P~om 105 Riverhead, ~w York 11901 Dear Stan: I I~ve completed my revi~ of the property ~aed by Glen H~idtm~. The owner proposes to construct a single family dwelling adjacent to a wooded swamp. The soil type on tkis lot is identified in the Suffolk. Corot%, Soil Survey as being Carver Plymouth Sand, 15 to 35 percent slcpas (CpE) and Muck ~u). An onsite inspection of this site verified this fact. The Carver Plymouth San. d is sloping steeply toward ~.e mu~k area. It is estimated t~hat the slope approximates one foot horizontal to twenty] feet vertiele (20~i)? ]his soil t}Te consists Of deep exnessivel7 draLned coarse textured soil. Permeability is rapid t~hrou~out t~he profile. The ~hazard of erosion is severe. The Muck soil type, is made up of very poorly drained org~m_ic soils that for- reed in partly decomposed or ~lra~st completely decomposed woody or herbaceous plants. ~ne water table is at or near the surface most of t/~e year. Several inches of water are on the surface in ~.rinter and spring. A detailed descrip- tion of Lhese soil types are included for your review. The major ~act this project may have on tbm adjacent ~ded s~ is related to ~he erosion potent~sl of the site and the septic system location. ~ne site b~s bee~_ stripped of the ~getation and organic matter t~hat had prev- iously protected this site from erosion. The area is currently depositing sed~t into the swamp every tiros it rains. A berm has been constructed along the roadway to prevent additional surfaco rt~off from entez~_ng tine site and contributing to tine erosion problem, It is importsnt that this berm be maintained. I would reeoamend installing str~ bale sed~n~nt barriers along the edge of the wooded m~, A barrier should also be installed hal~ay up the predominant slope to intercept sedime~nt. The barriers should be installed according to t~he attached standard. The sketch plan sh~s the location of the septic system to be 30 feet Lhe edge of the wooded sw~p. The water table at this location ~as 5 feet belc~ the ground surface at the ti~e of the inspection. ~e Snffo~c Healt~h ~=pa~nnsnt re~uires that the on site systenl be a ~ of 100 feet fro~ t~he .high water Tar%~ of surface %~aters. ~. Stanley A, Pauzer~ District M~nager SuffoLk County Soil & Water Conservation District - February 18, 1986 - Glem Heidtm~ property review (2) If the development proposal is ~pproved, I would reco~d installing the septic system at the hig~hest elevation allowable along the south property line. If I may be of furtAer assistance %~ith thais project, please let me Allan S. Connell District Conservationist USDA, Soil Conservation Service sore SURVEY ered by drainage, these soils can be used for crops. Reac- commonly grown crops, but a lack of suitable outlets tion is strongly acid to medium acid in the surface layer makes artificial drainage difficult. Because of wetness, and medium acid to sligh, tly acid in the subsoil. Natural most areas of this soil have been ]eh as woodland. Capa- fertility is medium, which is somewhat higher than that bility unit IVw-2; woodland suitability group 5wl. of other soils in the county. The response of crops to lime and fertilizer is good. The root zone is 20 to 95 Carver Series inches thick. Available moisture capacity is high in the lower part of the r6ot zone. The Carver series conMsts of deep, excessively drained, Representative profile of Canadice silt loam, in a coarse-textured soils. These soils are nearly level to steep wooded area, between Franklin Avenue and the railroad and are throughout the county on rolling moraines and broad outwash, plains. Slopes rango from 0 to 35 percent. Native vegetation is white oak, black oak, scrub oak, and tracks, one-half mile southwest of Greenport: 01---4 to 3 inches, toese oak and beech loaves. 02--3 inches to 0, black (10YR 2/1), ~ar~ly decomposed or- ganic matter: very hoavily matted with roots. Al---0 to 4 inches, dark-brown (10YR 3/3] silt loam; weak, medium, granular structure: friable; many roots; brownish gray (10YR 6/2). Canadice silt loam {¢c}.--This is the only Canadice soil mapped in the county. It is mainly in one large con- tinuous area near Greenport. Slope is 3 percent or less. Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of moderately well drained, gently doping soils that formed in the same kind of material as Canadice soil. Old clay pits are common because this soil prodded an excellent source of clay for making bricks. The hazard of erosion is slight on this soil. The soil must be artificially drained for successful production of pitch pine. In a representative profile a thin layer of leaf litter and partly decayed organic matter is on the surface. Below this is the surface layer of dark-gray sand about' 3 inches thick. The subsurface layer is gray or light-gray loose sand to a depth of 8 inches. The subsoil is loose sand to a depth of about 22 inches. It ,is brown in the upper part and strong brown in the lower part, The sub- stratum, to a depth of 60 inches, is loose sand that con- tains some gravel. It is light yellowish brown to brown- ich yellow to a depth of 31 inches. Below this, it is light yellowish brown. Carver soils have very ]ow available moisture capacity. Natural fertility is very low. The response of crops to applications of lime and fertilizer is fair. Permeability is rapid throughout. The root zone is mainly in the upper- most 80 to 40 inches. Representative profile of Carver sand from an area of Carver and Plymouth sands, 0 to 3 percent slopes, 4.8 miles east of Riverhead on south side of State Route 24 in Southampton: O1--2 inches to 1 inch, loose hardwood leaves. 02--1 inch to 0. black mull; a few white sand grains. Al--0 to 3 inches, dark-gray (10¥R 4/1) medium and coarse sand; massive; loose; common 'roots; very stxongly acid; clear, wavy boundary. A2---3 to 8 inches, gray or light*gray (10YR 6/1) medium and coarse sand; single grain; loose t common roots dark staining from charcoal left by forest tires; very strongly acid; abrupt, wavy boundary. B21--8 to 14 inches, brown (7.SYR 6/4) coarse and medium sand; single grain; loose; common roots; very strongly acid; clear, irregular boundary. B22--14 ko 22 inches, strong-brown (7.SYR 5/6) coarse sand; massive to very weak. medium, subangUlar blocky structure; very friable to loose; common roots; some interflngering of dark-brawn material; 5 percent rounded gravel in lower part; very strongly acid; cloar, WaVy boundary. C1--22 to 31 inches, light yeilowish-brown (10YR 6/4) to brownish-yellow (10~R 6/6) coarse sand; single grain; loose: a few roots; 5 percent rounded gravel: a few yellowish-brown spots; very strongly acid: gradual, wavy boundary. C2--31 to 60 inches, light yellowish-brown (2.5Y 6/4) coarse sand and a few pebbles; single grain, loose; 10 per- cent fine gravel; very strongly acid. The thickness of the solum ranges from 16 to 32 inches. The content of coarse fragments ranges from 0 to 15 Percent in the solum and from 5 to 30 percent in the substratum. action ranges from very strongly acid to s~rengly acid throughout. ~exture of the solum ranges from fine sand to coarse sand, but it generally is medium and coarse sand. Consistence ranges from very friable to loose, The A1 horizon ranges from black (10¥R 2/1) to dark gray (10YR 4/1). It is massive or has weak, granular strec- tuts. The AY, horizon ranges from gray (10¥R 5/1) m light brownish gray (10YR 6/2). SO~'~'OLK COUNTY~ IX~EW YOEK 67 · 'ho B horizons rang~ from brown (?.b'YR 5/4) to brownish (10YR 6/6). These horizons are single grain or mas- stye to weak granular structure. · he C horizon ranges from yellowish brown (10YR 5/4) to yellow (2.5Y 7/6). Carver sells are asseeiatod with Plymouth sells. Carver ~oils are similar to Plymouth coils; but they have a promi- neat A2 horizon, and the upper part of the B horizon is richer in iron and humus. Also associated with Carver soils are Deerfleld soils that have a seasonal high water table within a depth of 18 to 24 inches. Carver and Plymouth sands, 0 to 3 percent slopes {Cp^].--These soils are mainly on outwash plains; how- ever, they are also on some flatter hilltops and interven- ing dr~ws on moraines. A small part of this mapping /mit is slightly undulating. This unit can be made up entirely oi Carver sand, entirely of Plymouth sand, or of a combination of the two soils. The Carver soil in this mapping unit has the profile ~escribed as representative of the Carver series. The Plymouth. soil has a profile Similar to the one described as representative of the Plymouth series, except that its texture is sand throughout the profile, rather tlmn loamy sand. Included with these soils in mapping are small areas 0i Plymouth loamy sand and areas of loamy sands that have:a profile similar to soils of the Carver series. Also included are soils that are like Carver soils that have dark iron and humus coatings on the sand grains in the upper part of .the subsoil. Also included are small areas 0f Haven or Rlverhead soils on moraines that have dense cover oi vegetation and a complex topography. The hazard of erosion is slight on the soils in this unit. These soils are droughty. Natural fertility is low. These soils are not well suited to the crops commonly grown in the county. Because these soils tend to be drcughty, lawns and shrub plantings are difficult to e~tsblish and maintain. Almost all of this unit has been left in woodland or in brusl~ Many areas previously cleared for farming are now idle. ll[o~t areas in the west- em part of the county and near the shores of the eastern part of the county are. used for housing developments. Capability unit VHs-1, woodland suitability group 5al. Carver and Plymouth sands, 3 to 15 percent slopes {CpC}.--Thes~ soils are mainly on rolling moraines; how- ever~ they are also on the sida slopes ~f many drainage chaan.els on the outwash plains. Individual areas of this mapping unit are large on the roiling topography of the Ronkonkoma moraine, and in these areas slopes are com- plex. On'the outwash plain, this unit is in long, narrow strips parallel to drai~ge~ays. This unit can be made up entirely of Carver sand, entirely of Plymouth sand, or of a combination of the two soils. The Carver soil in this mappmg unit has a profile similar to the profile described as representative of that series. The Plymouth soil in this unit has a proffie simi- lar to the profile described as representative of the Plymouth series, except that its texture is sand through- out the profile.~ rather than loamy sand. Generally included with this unit in mapping are areas of Plymouth loamy sand or loamy coarse sand that are very close to sand in texture. Also included are small areas of Carver and Plymouth sands, 0 to 3 per- cent slopes. Small areas of these soils on moraines are as much as 25 percent gravel throughout, especially along the crests of low ridges. Also included are soils similar .to ttds Carver soil that have dark iron and humus coat- ~ngs on the sand grains in the upper par~ o£ the subsoil. In the bottom of many closed depressions, these soils have siltier accumulations from adjoining hillsides; and in some places silty lenses are deep into the substratum. The hazard of erosion is slight to moderate on the soils in this unit. These soils are droughty, and natural fertility is low. In some places, slope xs a limitation to These soils are not well suited to crops commonly grown in the country. These sandy soils severely limit installation and maintenance of lawns and landscaping shrubs. Almost all o£ these soils are in woodland. Many areas in the western part of the county, particularly along the north shore, are used as homesites. Capability unit 'Vlls-1; woodland suitability group 5sl. Carver and Plymouth sands, 15 to 35 percent slopes {CpEl.--These soils are almost exclusively on moraines ex- cept for a few steep areas on side slopes along some oi the more deepl~y cut drainage channels on outwash plains. On morainic landforms these areas are large, and slopes generaily are complex, especially on the Ronkon- korea moraine. On the outwash plains the areas are in long, narrow strips parailel to the drainage channels. Some areas are made up entirely of Carver sand, others entirely of Plymouth sand, and still others of a combina- tion of the t~o soils. The C~arver soil in this. mapping unit has a profile si~.ilar to the profile described as representative of that sones, except that the gravel content is greater, and gravel makes up as much as 15 percent, bp volume, of the soil in some places. The Carver soil in this unit gen- erally is a few inches thinner to the substratum than the soil described as representative. The Plymouth soil in this unit is similar to the soil described as representative of the Plymouth series, except that its texture is sand rather than loamy sand. Also, it has a higher content of gravel, and gravel makes up as much as 15 percent, by volume, of the soil in some places. Included with these soils in mapping are small areas of loamy sand and small areas of Carver and Plymouth sands. 0 to 3 percent slopes, or $ to 15 percent slopes. Also. on moraines, some areas of this unit contain as much as 30 percent gravel and a few cobblestones. Such areas generally are small and are in a mixed pattern with soils that contain less gravel. Also included are areas of Montauk loamy sand, sandy variant, 15 to 35 percent slopes, that have a weakly developed fi-ag/pan or a fragipan that is at a depth of more than about 4 feet. Also included are soils that are similar to Carver soils that have dark iron and humus coatings on the sand grains in the upper part of the subsoil. Also included are small areas of Haven and Riverhaad soils that have slopes of more than 15 percent. The hazard of erosion is moderate to s~vere on the soils in this nnit~ These.. soils are droughty, and natural fertility is low. Moderately steep to steep slopes are a limitation to use. The soils of this unit are poorly soited to crops com- mouly grown in the county. Areas of these soils have not been cleared for farming. A few areas in the western ~FFOLK COUNt"/', NEW YORK' . . 77 gently undulating moraines. Areas are narrow and long knobs, ridges, and hogbacks included with tiffs unit con- on short side slopes along drainage channels. Areas that tain from 15 to 30 percent gravel and cobblestone~ have complex slopes make up the larger acreages. These gravelly areas generally are small, and they are in Included with this soil in mapping are areas of soils a complex pattern with nongravelly soil. Small areas of that have a weak fragipan. These soils are similar to gently sloping and .moderately sloping Mon~auk sandy Plymouth soils, except that they have firm bands in the variant soils are also included. substratum. Also included are areas that have a fragipan The hazard of erosion is moderate to severe on this at a depth o{ more than 40 inches and areas that con, in Montank sandy variant. This soil is not suited to crops as much as 25 percent .grayel and cobblestenes. Very stony commonly grown in the county, because of steepness of or stony areas are indicated on the detailed map by the slope and droughtiness. Tiffs soil is suited to woodland, conventional symbol for stoniness, and most of it is nsed for that purpose. A few less slo.p7 The hazard of erosion is slight on this Monta.~uk sandy ing areas are used as sites for homes. Capability unit variant. This soil is moderately well suited to ~be crops VIis-l; woodland suitability group 4s2. commonly grown in the county. The main concerns of management are droughtiness and low fertility. Most of M,,~lr this soil is wooded, but a few areas are cleared and are ..~.,v.~ used ~ur pasture or homesites. Capability unit IIIs-1; woodland suitability group 4sl. . Montauk loamy sand, sandy variant, 8 to t5. percent slopes {MnC}.--This unit is on moraines along drainage Coh~l.uneis and on large areas of complex, undulating ~o co ling topography where the domir~nt slope is 8 to 15 percent. The profile of this soil is similar to the one described as representative for the series, except that it has more gravel in the upper 2 feet in some areas. Included with this soil in mapping are areas that have a weak fragipan that intergrade to soils of the Plymouth series. Also included are sandy soils without stones that are underlain by till. These small included areas appear to be aeolian in nature and are scattered throughout the suit. Also included on complex slopes are a few areas o~ ~fontauk loamy sand, sandy variant. 8 to 8 percent slopes. The hazard of erosion is moderate to severe in areas that are cleared for cultivation. 'This soil is not well suited to most crops commonly grown m the count~, because slopes are steep, available moisture capacity .as low or very Iow, and fertility is Iow. Growing crops m longer re~tions helps to control runoff and erosion. Al- most all of this soil is in woodland. A few areas are used as sites for summer homes. Capability unit IVs-1; wood- land suitability group 4s1. Montauk loamy sand, sandy variant, 15 to 35 percent slopes {~nE}.--This soil is on the complex topography of the moraine on the eastern end of the south fork. Most areas of this soil are large. Only a few small areas have simple slopes. Deep kettle holes and low steep-sided r~dges and mounds are characteristic in areas of this soil. The profile of this soil is similar te the profile of the soil described as representative of the series, except e_xpression of the fragipen is variable. Also, more areas of ~his soil contain as much as 15 percent coarse frag- ments, and more boulders are on the surface of this soil, especially east of ]~/Iontauk. Included with this soll in mapping are ]~onteuk and Bridgehampton, till substratum soils that have slopes of more than 15 percent. These soils are underlain by till, and they make UP less than 5 percent of the unit. Also i~n?uded are many small areas of Carver, Plymouth, and R~verh.~e~l soil.s~th.~t are too small to map separately. In piaess these soils nave till below a depth of 4 feet. Small Muclr [Mu} is made up of very poorly drained organic soils that formed in partly decomposed or almost corn~ p]ete]y decomposed woody or herbaceous plants. The areas generally are nearly level and occur ~n the bottom of closed depressions or kettle holes and along a few of the larger streams. Most areas are along the psoonie River and near Mantauk in many depressions tha~ are irregular in shape. A few areas, however, are between tidal marshes and areas of better drained upland soils. Muck is made up of 16 to 48 inches of spongy, black or dark-reddish organic material over loose sand and gravel.. The amount of partly decayed plants in the organic layer varies. The water table is at or near the surface meat of the year. Several inches of water are on the surface late in winter and in sp.ring. Included with this land type m mapping are small areas that are muck to a depth of more then 48 inches and a few areas of fresh-water march along the Peconic River that are under water throughout the year. 1Vfuck is suited to cranberries in some places; however, most areas are small, and it is not economieal, ly feasible to develop them. Almost all of this la.n.d type as in wood- land or marsh grass. It is better suited to .t~.~itat for wetland wildlife than to other uses. Capability unit VIIw-1: woodland suitability group not assigned. Plymouth Series The Plymouth series consists of deep, excessively drained, coaese-tex~ured soils that formed in a mantle of loamy sand or sand over thick layers of stratlfied coarse sand and gravel. These nearly level te steep soils are throughout the county on broad, gently sloping to level outwash plains and on undulating to steep moraines. Native vegetation eonsiste of white oak~ black oak, pitch pine, and scrnb oak. In a representative profile the surface layer is very dark grayish-brown loamy sand, about 4 inches thick, in w?oded areas. In cultivated areas the surface layer is mixed with material formerly in the upper part of the subsoil, and there is a brown to dark-brown plow layer o~ loam about 10 inches thick. The subsoil is yellowish- brown and brown~ very. friable and loose loamy sand to a depth of about ~7 inches. The substratum, to a depth of abou~t ~8 inches, is yellowish-brown, loose gravelly coarse Plymouth soils have low to very low available mois- ture capacity. Natural fertility is low. The response of SOIL SURVEY crops to 1/me and ferti]izer is fair. Reaction is strongly acid to very strongly acid throughout the profile of most of these soils, but it is strongl~ acid to medium acid in the lower substratum of soils in the silty substratum phase. The root zone is confined mainly to the nppsr 25 to 35 inches. Internal drainage is good. Permeability is rapid in all of these soils except in those of the silty sub- stratum phase. Permeability is moderate in the silty layer of soils in the silty substratum phase. Represeaxtative profile of Plymouth loamy sand, 0 to 8 percent slopes, in a wooded area, in Hsekseher State Park: AI~0 to 4 inches, very dark grayish~brcwn (10YE 3/2) loamy sand; very weak, medium, granular structure; very friable; many fine roots; 5 percent fine gravel; many clean white sand grains; very strsngly acid; clear, wavy boundary. B21--4 to 10 inches, ycilowish-brown (10YR 5/4) loamy sand; singlo grain to very weak. medium, subangular blocky structure; very friable; eonnnon roots; 5 per- cent fine gravel; material similar ~o that in the A1 horizon makes up 20 percent of the mass; very ~ strongly acid; gradual, wavy boundary. B22~10 to 17 inches, ycilowish-brcwn (10YR 5/6) loamy sand; single grain; loose; common roots; 5 percent fine gravel; very strongly add; gradnul, wavy boundo2y. B2~---17 to 27 inches; brown (7.SYR 5/4) loamy sand; singla ~ain; very frlabla; a few roots; 10 percent gravcl: very strongly acid; clear, wavy boundary. IIC--27 to 58 inches, yellowish-brown (I[0YR 5/6) gravelly coarse sand; single grain; loose; a few very fine roots; 30 percent rounded pebbles I inch and less in diameter; very strongly acid. ~ne sultan in uner~led profiles ranges from 20 to 36 inches in thickness and cerresponds with the depth to underlying cearae sand and gravel. The content of gravel or boulders in the solum ranges from about 2 in 20 percent, by volume. ~Une content of gravel and cobblestones in the substratum ranges from 10 to 40 percent, by volume. Reaction ranges from strongly acid to very s~rongly acid. · he A1 and Ap horizons range from very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) to brown or dark brown (7.5¥R 4/2). In undulating areas a thin, light-celorcd, weak A2 horizon is present below the Al horizon in some profiles. Texture in the A horizon ranges from sand se loamy sand and gravelly loamy sand. It is massive or the structure is weak or very weak granular. Consistence is very friable or loose. The Ap horizon, if present, ranges from 8 to 12 inches in thickness. The B horizon ranges from dark yellowish brown (10¥R 4/4) w srxong brown (7.SYR 5/6J. "2extalra ranges from sand to loamy sand and loamy fine sand. and in some places, it is gravelly. It is single grain or has very weak, subangular, blocky structhre; the latter is in profiles that have higher proportions of fine and very fine sand. Consistence ranges from friable to loose, In l~laces a coarse s/md or losany coarse sand B3 horizon is present and ranges from ~ ~o 7 /riches in thicimess. The 0 horizon ranges from yellowish brown (10¥R 5/6) to light yellowish brown (2.§Y 6/4). Texture is mainly gravelly coarse sand or coarse sand. but in some areas silt loam lay- ers are below a depth o~ 40 inches to a depth of 5 To 8 feet. Pebbles in the C horizon generally r/rage from ¥~ /neh to 3 inches in dtsmetex, but a few cobblestones are prcsen~ in some profiles. Plymouth soils are near Carver, Dcerficld, Haven, River- 1~ cim~cterhg~ a~ Dearficld and War~h~m sollZ. Plymouth soils helr the fragipan and till substratum of l~onteuk, sandy variant soils. Plymouth loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes This soil has ,the profile described as representative of the series. It ~s mainly on outwash plaius south of the Ronkonkoma moraine. It is also on flat hilltops and in drainageways on morainic deposits. The areas generally are nearly level, but they are somewhat undulating in some places. Areas on outwash plains are large and uni- form, and areas on the moraine are small and irregular. Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of Riverhead soils that have a texture that is marginal to to,a,~m~y~ sand. Also included are some loamy sands that ha; e a profile similar in appearanos to the soils of the Carver series. On moraines, scattered areas of l~Iuntauk sandy variant soils that have a weak fragipan and loose underlying till layers are included. These areas inter- grade between Plymouth loamy sands and Montaak loamy sand, sandy variants. In ~he larger areas of this unit. small aersages of Carver and Plymouth sands are included. Scattered throughout the county and on Fish- ers Island are areas that are dominantly fine sand. The hazard of erosion is slight on this Plymouth soil. This soil is fairly well suited to crops commonly grown in the county, t~Ia~.~/ areas were formerly cleared ~or farming~ but most of these areas are idle or ars in brush or trees. Small areas that are in large tracts with River- head or Haven soils are the only areas used for farming. In the western part of the county, most of this soil is used for housing developments a~d as industrial sites. Capability unit IIIs-1; woodland suitability group 4s1. Plymouth loamy sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes This soil is on moraines and outwash plains. Slopes are undulating, or they are single along the sides of inter- mittent drainageways. The undulating areas generally ars large. The areas Mung intermittent drainageways are harrow and long, and they follow the course of the drainage channel. Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of Riverhead soils that are marginal to loamy sand in tex- ture. Also included are loamy sands that have profiles similar to those of soils in the'Carver series. Other inclu- sions on moraines are Montank loamy sand, sandy var- iant soils that have a weak fragipan or areas that ars too small to map separately. These are intergrades between Plymouth loamy sand and Montauk loamy sand, sandy variant soils. Small gravelly areas' less than about 2 acres in size are included. Included are a few small areas, par- ticularly on Fishers Island, that ars dominantly fine sand, The hazard of erosion is slight on this Plymouth soil. This soil tends to be droughty. This soil is fairly well suited to the crops commonly grown in the county. Some areas were formerly used for farming, but most such areas are in brush or are idle. In the western part of the county, this soil is used mainly for housing developments. Capability unit 1Tis-l; woodland suitability group 4s1. Plymouth loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes {?ICI.- This moderately sloping soil is on moraines and o.u. twagh' plahrs, Where it occurs on mo.raines, slopes are rolhng m many places, and the strrface.m broken by closed depres- sious. On outwash plains thru soil is on the shor~ side slopes along intermittent drainageways. Areas on STRAW BALE SED!F~ENT BARILTERS STANDARD Definition temporary harrier of fixed straw 6r other bales with a lif~ expectancy of 6 months or less, installed across or at the bottom of a slope. Purpose To intercept and detain small amounts of sediment from unprotected slopes of l~ited size. To disperse or spread overland flows. To protect new seedings. To filter storm runoff. ~plicat~ons straw bale barrier is used: At storm, drain inlets, across minor swales, as training dikes, along ~roperty lines. '~--~_~ ~ere there is little or no concentration of water in a char~uel or other ~-ainageway above the barrier. Where contributing drainage arez is less than 1/2 acre and the length of slope above tlne barrier is less than 100 feet° The practice may ~lso be used for a lone single-f~ily lot if the slope is less than 15%. The contributing drainage area in this instance shall be less than ! acre ~d the length of slope above ~he barrier shall be less than 200 feet. krea and interval criteria may be doubled on ~ hydrologic group soils, and on sandy subsoils° -p~si~.n~Criteria A design is not required, but location and extent shall be sho%~. Ail bales shall be placed on the contour and shall be either wire bound or nylon string tied. Loosely tied or oddly shaped bales may not be used. Inspect for van- dalism. Alignment shall be exactly on the contour. At each end, t%~ or more bales shall be laid up the slope to contain the runoff. Straw bale barriers that are over 100 feeu long require sutxtivision into a series of sl%ortcr impound- ments. '=NY-Nassau/Suffolk ~/77 Stra%~ Bale Sediment Barriers BALE SEDIMENT BARRIERS Angle first stake toward previously laid Flow Wire or nylon bound bales placed on the contour 2 re-bars, steel pickets, or 2" x 2" stakes 1 1/2' to 2' in ground ANCHORING DETAIL Construction Specifications 1. Bales shall be placed in a row with ends tightly abutting the adjacent bales, Each bale shall be embedded in the soil a minimum of 4;'. 3, Bales shall be securely anchored in place by stakes or re-bars driven through the bales. The first stake in each bale shall be angled toward previously laid bale no force bales together. 4. Inspection shall be frequen[ and repair or replacement shall be made promptly as needed. 5. Bales shall be removed when they have served their usefulness so as not to block or impede storm flow or.drainage. Standard Symbol * Drainage area less than 1/2 acre. U. S. DEPARtmENT OF AGRICULTUREt SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE , t __ Riverhead, ~ ~ SBSB Straw Bale Sediment Barriers Standar-~-~ Dr~wln~ 38.2 -~f-Nassau/Suffolk $/77 BOARD OF TOW~N TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTflOLD ~- v . - - ~ ~o~s ~ Road ~'ho.e 76~-~892 N9 308~ ' BO~D OF TO~- ~USTEES RESOLUTION - NOVEMBER 25, 1985 RESOLVED that the Southold Town Trustees declare itself lead agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in the matter of the application of Glenn F. Heidtmann for a Wetland Permit on certain property located on Brigantine Drive, Harbor Lights, Lot ~ 66, Southold. SUFFOLK ~UNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ~ERV~ WASTE WATERMANAGEMENT SECTION Suffolk County Center Riverhead, New York 11901 NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION - RESIDENTIAL SO~,[~'~. l(~ I H,S, Reference N0,1'~ The surveys for your proposed sewage disposal and water supply systems have been reviewed and the following will be required prior to further processing of the application for ap- proval to construct. PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM WITH ANY RESUBMISSION, I. PRELIMINARY APPROVALS - OTHER AGENCIES  N .Y.S. Dept. of E~v. Conservation To""Wetl'ands Dra nage [] S.C.D.H.S. Vector Control II, SURVEY DATA .AND INFORMATION REQUIRED r~ Test Bomng and'Location 0 Corner Elevations . D Name, Address, Phone # Required 0 Statement Signed by Applicant _ ~ Surrounding Property-Vacant or Improved (within radius of 100'} Indicate any Surface Water Within 300'of Plot Distance to Nearest Public Water Main ri 0 Indicate Source of Domestic Water of Adjacent Dwellings Public Sewer Stub Location 0 0 0 0 Sewer District Approval SEQRA Determination Three Prints of Survey Required with Surveyors Original Stamp/Signature Proposed House Location S.C. Tax Map Identification Required Indicate Square Footage of Lot Grading Plan Showing Elevations of Sewage Disposal System, Foundation and Final Grade Public Water Availability Letter From Water District Test Well Required on Your Lot as per' the Attached B~lletin Application Fee Test Boring Inadequate,See Remarks III, Other/Remarks: FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE REQUIRED For Department Use Onl~ Date Prepared I~( Notified b~ Person SU~XOLK COUNTY, NE'er' YORK NO. 9 z z ~f -7% J~ -f-