Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-4150Board Of $outhold Town Trustees SOUTHOLD NEW YORK PERMIT NO. 4150 DATE: April. 30, 1993 ISSUED TO Pia~r.~ Gaza~f],~.n ........... Pursuant to fhe provisions of Chepfer 61,5 of the Laws of fha Sta'J'e of New York, 1893; and Chapter 404. of the Laws of State of New York 19,52; and the Southold Town Ordinance en- titled "REGULATING AND THE PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and +he REMOVAL OF SAND, GRAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;" and in accordance with the ResoJufio~ of The Board adopted afa meeting held on ~pr~l 19 9~ and in consideration of the sum cf $ 250.00 paid by John Geideman on behalf of Pierre Gazarian of N.Y. and subject to the Terms and Conditions Jis~'ed on the reverse side hereof, of Soufhold Town Trustees au+horlzes and permlfs the following: to cons~ruc~ bulkhead to line up with neighbors bulkhead. all in accordance with the detailed specifications as presented in the originating application. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees here- by causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this dafe. TRUSTEES John M. BredemeYer. III. President Albert J. Krupskk Jr.. Vice President Henry P. Smith John B. Tuthill William G. Albenson Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax ~[516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 May 11, 1993 John Geideman P.O. Box 416 East Marion, NY 11939 Re: Pierre Gazarian SCTM %t000-26-2-47 Dear Mr. Geideman: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during i{s regular meeting held on April 29, 1993 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, John Geideman on behalf of Pierre Gazarian applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated January 4, 1993 and, WHEREAS said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on April 29, 1993 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony 8/id documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees approves the application of John Geideman on behalf of Pierre Gazarian to construct bulkhead to line up with the neighbors bulkhead. permit will expire two years from the date it is signed. Fees must be paid, if applioablea and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Two inspections are required and the Trustees are to be notified upon completion of said project. Permit will be issued upon payment of the be done below Mean High Water Mark: No fees following fees for work to Very truly you_rs, President, Board of Trustee JMB:jd TRUSTEES John M. Bredemever. III. President Albert J. Krupski. Jr.. Vice President Henry P. Smith John B. Tuthill W'flliam G. Albertson Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 $.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT APPLICATION NO. 1000-26-2-47 NAME: Pierre Gazarion DATE: March 30, 1993 Chapt. Chapt. 97 - Wetlands 37 - Coastal Erosion RESOLVED tha.~ pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, State F~vironmental Quality Review and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.i0 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Trustees, as Lead Agency for the actiondescribed below, has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. TYPE OF ACTION: Type I. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Applicant proposes to replace bulkhead damaged by storm. Bulkhead to line up with neighbors bulkhead. Located Willow Terrace Lane, Orient Harbor. Board also to approve, was onlast months Public Hearing. LOCATION:SCTM 91000-26-2-47 REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: 1. An on site inspection has been conducted by the Board of Trustees. 2. An environmental assessment, submitted by the applicant and reviewed and completed by the Board of Trustees, has indicated that no significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. cc: CAC TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III. President Albert J. Krupski. Jr.. Vice President Henry P. Smith John B. Tuthill William G.. Albenson Telephone {516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 APPLICATION NO. NAME: Pierre DATE: January 28, S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE DECLARATION ' NOTICE~OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT Chapt. 97 - Wetlands Chapt. 37 - Coastal Erosion RESOLVED that Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, State Environmenta Review and 6NYCRR Part-617, Section 617.10 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby the Southold Town'Trustees, as Lead Agency for the action below, h~s determined that the proDect will not have a sic ~ican~ effect on the environment. Please take further notice considered a determination made which may also have an app] project. A planting survey shall be TYPE OF ACTION: Type I this declaration should not be or any other department or agency pending for the same or similar submitte~prior to final approval. LOCATION:SCTM 91000-26-2-47 REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: 1. An on site inspection has been Trustees. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: to replace bulkhead damaged by storm. Bulkhead to line up with neighbors bulkhe~. conducte~by the Board of 2. An environmental assessment, submitted by t~ applicant and reviewed and completed by the Board of Trustees, has indicated 'that no significant adverse~effects to the environment are likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. cc: CAC TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, 1Ii, President Albert J. Krupski. Jr.. Vice President Henry P. Smith John B. Tuthill William G. Albertson Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN O1~ SOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 March 10, 1993 John Geideman P.O. Box 416 East Marion, NY 11939 RE: Pierre Gazarian SCTM ~1000-26-2-47 Dear Mr. Geideman The following action was taken by the Southold Town Board of Trustees on Thursday, February 25, 1993: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Trustees rescinds the Negative Declaration of January 28, 1993 and assumes lead agenoy in the above referenced property. if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. truty yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB: j md cc: Mark Carrara, DEC TRUSTEES Iohn M. Bredemeyer, Ecl, President Henry P. Smith, Vice President Albert 3[. Krupski, Jr. John L. Bednoski, Jr. John B, Tuthill Telephone (516) 765-1892 ' Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTt h HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 COASTAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION TOWN WETLANDS PERMIT APPLICATION TRUSTEE LANDS PERMIT APPLICATION  Office Use Only:r__ Stal Erosion Permit Application ~etland Permit Applicati0~n [~"~["~~"~!~! ~rustee Lands Permit Application ~G~andfather ~ / ~ompleted Apps'. Date: /~ ~arzance Requmred, ~Ne~hbors not.fled Date- /Coord.. Revmew~?pt.,mand. SEQRA Determin./dat?:3~{~3 ~lic Hearing/date.~-~q3 Findings: . , Per~it Vote: ~N). ~DD~ [. 'Special Conditions: ~ (also see file) ~piicaniou Application Number; SC1~4 al000- ~6- ~ '--~7 Project Name (If any) Date Prepared: Applicant: Address: Phone (owner, c~sultant,lessee,etc. ) Internist: ,~'~of Proper ty: At, dress Subject Property Location: ( rovlde LILCO Pole location map) Distance no cross Streens if THIS IS NOT A PERMIT noL on Yds. to be excavated: Yds. to be filled: Manner ~in which material will be removed or deposited: Width of canal, creek or bay fronting property: /¢~ ~ Depth at low tide: Aver. ris~ in tide: ~± Distance to nearest channel: Doo - Distance pro~ect extends beyond ~imilar projects i--~a: ' Area zoning: 6, Land area in acres: Is project for private or business use: ~ Intended use df property: f~_~ ' Describe known prior operations conducted on premises: -~-~ Has any prior lioense or permit been issued to erect~structures, dredge, or deposit fill on said premises: ~ Has any license or permit_.ever been revoked or suspended by a Governmental Agency: ~-~ Project Description The project description must also include plans for reclamation of land disturbed during construction o~ the principle and accessory structures and underground structures (i.e., pipeline and septic sysuem; m~ke additional attachments if necessary). Authorization (Where the applicant is I residing at (Print-owner of subject propcruy) no~ the owner~~ (Mailing address-phone) do hereby authorize to apply for Coastal Erosion permit(s) from the Southold Town Trustees Signauure THIS IS NOT A PERMIT County of Suffolk State of New York ) BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND .AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT[~S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER K~IOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND~ AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY ANDALL DAMAGES ~' CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(s) OR REPRESENTATIVE(s), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. //-~ swoRN TO BEFORE ME THIS OF ; Suggested space for location Map THIS IS NOT A PERMIT Civil ,JOHN H. GEIDEMAN Consulting .Engineer (516) 477-2421 P.O. Box 416 £. Marion, L.I, New York 11939 To Whom It May Concern, *John H. Geideman ~o act ~s r~y r~ent in a~p~ing CO cons~,~"tlc~, a on my pmoperty a~ authorize for permits InCluding: N.Y.S Dept. of Environ~a~nta] U. S. Armv Corps of Engineers Town of ~z~L ~/ Jons~P¥o t ~ o~/ y TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, IIL President Albert J. Ka'upskL Jr.. Vice President Henry P. Smith John B. Tuthill William G. Albertson Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OFSOUTHOLD 30 year Maintenance Agreement Erosion Protection Structures Chapter 37 Southold Town Code Southold Trustees as Administrator SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road EO. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 type/or print name ( s ) the owners of record'of property at: ~d ~~ (type or print street address) SCTM 41000- 2~--~-~ in applying for a Coastal Erosion permit for an Erosion Protection Structure do. hereby agree to a 30 y~a~intenance program for a structure commonly known as a ;/~%~.~ of /Zo~ -/~/~73 as shown on the attached feet of length licensed survey of the as-built structure. It is my/our understanding that we are to maintain this structure w~th materials designed to endure 30 years and or equivalent to the original approved structure and that for any maintenance which involves more than 5% in length of this structure we are to give prior written notice to the administrator, waiting for their approval in all but true emergency situation's which would seriously endanger life, property and important coastal natural resource features such as bluffs or wetlands. We further understand that failure to maintain the structure could result in a requirement to post a bond and or have the repairs ordered as a lien against the property upon a finding by the Trustees that said lack of maintenance would risk life, property o~r important natural resources features including protec~e~ ~are or threatened animals and plants. NOTARY PUBLIC Please submit three copies of a licensed land survey made within one year of the original construction. This maintenance agreement shall only be valid upon the final approval of the administrator. Subsequent owners may apply to the Southold Town Trustees to re-authorize this maintenance agreement. · · . R~JECT I,D. NUMSER 617.2~D Appendl~ ~ State Environme~ltal Quality Review .~ SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEt'~IT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only 'ART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (To be comoleted by Aeolicant or Project soonsor) SEQF PROPOSED AC;ION: [~ Expansion [~Modi~icatlonlalteration DESCR[eE PROaECT BRIEFLY: 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? --'.J~rYes [~ No If Ho. describe ~Res,dential ~ ~nduslrial ~ Comme,clal ~ Agriculture ~ P~,ktFores~Osen soace ~ Other ~0. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPRO~A~ OR FUNDING, HOW OR ULTIMATELY PROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERA~ 1=. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISIING PERMit/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? CERTIFy THAT THE INFORMAT ROVIOED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE 8EST OF MY KNOWL:EDGE If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coasts. Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COON,J[NATED REVIEW AS PROVIOED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.87 I! NO, ,s r:egallve declaration may be superseded bv anomer invoWed agency, C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING; (Answers may be handwritten, il lee=ole) D. IS 7HERF-, OR IS THERJ~ LIKELY TO BE. CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTA _ IMPACTS? PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (Le. urban or rural); ~ Check this box il you have identitied one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY ,' occur. Then proceed direcHy to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive ~ Cheek this box if you have determined, based o~ the information and anaiys~s a~ove one any supporting documenla~on, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse env~ronment&[ impacts '14-16-2 I2/87]-- 7c 617.21 . SEQR State Environmental Quality Review ~. FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. ~he question o~ whether an action may be sign f cant is not always easy to answer. Ffequent- I¥~ there are aspectS of ~ 0rojePt that ~re, subiective-or unmeasureable. It is also Understood that those who determine s~gnifi~ance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically exoert in environmental analysis. In addition, manywho have knowledge m one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. , . . -,. ~ ,. ,. ~ ,~_, ~ ~ · The fuji EAF s ntended to provide a h~e~h'od~wher~by appl cants and agencies cnn'be assured that the determ nat on process has beeff,orderiy comprehensive m nature, yet flexible to allowjntrodu ~tion of information to fit a project or action. Fall [AF Components~ The full EAF is comprised of thre.e parts: data and mformatron about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project :, =- - ~r~l:~P[bvides objective data. it a~ists a reviewer in the anal,~sis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. ?art 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible i'mpacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides g~tidance as.to whether an imoact is likely to be considered small to ~oderate or whether it is a p~)tentiallv- large impact. The form also identifies whether an ~moact can be mitig~ated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as notentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether Or not the impact is actually important. .. ~_ ::_': DE~ER-b;tlNA:TION OF SI(5:N-I. FI,GA~'E---~Type t and~Unti-st~:d~'Ac~ions '~ldentif¥ th~ Portions o~A~9~plet~d for th~s~prbje~t:. ~. ~ ~d.:Part ~1 ...... ~*~rt 2~. :-~' ~'~rt 3 Upon review of the information recorded on thi~ EAF fPar~ 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate~, and any other suoDorting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonabl', determined by the lead agency that: ~ A. The project will nor result in any large and, important impact(s) and. therefore. ~s one which will not have a significant imoact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action bec3use the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a C~DITIONED Begat ve dedarat on w be prepared.* ~ ~ C. The project ma', result in one or more large and i~ oortant impacts that may have a significant impact o~ the enwronment therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative D'~cla}ation is ~y valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Ty[~Name of Resp~Je Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Ressonsible Officer in lead Agencg Title of Responsible Officer Sigr~at~Zoi Preparerilf different from responsible officer] Date PART 1--PROJF. CT INFC,..MATION Prepared by Project Sponsor -- NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed mav have a significant effect on the en ~ronment. Hease complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions wdl be cons~dereF as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition1, information you believe wilt be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the fu EAF will be dependent on information currentN available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address. Munlcipalit~ and County] NAME OF APPL[CANTISPONSOR SUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS ~ CITY/PO STATE t ZiP CODE NAME OF OWNER (if different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION ~', ~ ~ ~:~ . Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall prelect, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Presentland use: I-IUrban Fltndustrial I~Forest F1Asricplture F1Commercial [~Residential (suburban) 17Rural (nomfarm~ [=]Other acres. ~, ,~ PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION & acres acres acres acres 2. Total acreage of project area: APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (F~e4k'i*~..~r tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated [Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: [~Well drained /'~ % of site ~]Poori'. drained I~Moderately well drained % of site % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved ho~.v many acres of soil are classified wid' in soil group I through 4 of the NYse.= Land Classification System? acres. ISee 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Ate there bedrock outcroppings on prelect site? 171yes a. What is depth to bedrock? fin feet} of propo~prolect site w~th slopes: F~0t'J0 % % ~10-15% __ % 5.. Approx~m ate;p,e~,,c,~t age [~15% or grea~gr % 6. ts project substantially contiguous to, or cbntg(fi~m~L~i~'~'fi~', '~ii~. 0~: ~]i'~'~fict, ilsted on the St,~te or the National Registers of Historic Places? f~Yes ~j~No (~'. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ~Yes 6. What is the depth of the water table.~ (in feet) 9. Is site ib~at~d over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? E]Yes [~No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area~ I~Yes [~No 11. Does project site contain any spedes of plant o~ animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? E~Yes [~'N c~ According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on2~be project site.~ (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) l-lYes ~No Describe 13. Is the ~rojec" sit.~ presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open ~pace or recreation area? r-lYes ~[]~No f yes, explain ..: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? FqYes ~o 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: ~' - a. Name of Stream and name of River to which E is tributary 16. Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to proiect area: a. Name 17. Is the site served by existing oublic utdities? E]Yes [~'No a) If Yes does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? b) If Yes. will imorovements be necessary to al ow connect on? b. Size lin acres) ~Yes [~No E~Yes I~No 18. Is the site located in an ?gricultural district certified pursuant to AgricuLture and Markets Law. Article 25-AA. Sectio~ 303 and 304? I~Yes ~No 19. ls the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Em ironmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 [~Yes J~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? i~Yes B. Project Description /~o' of- ~o/~,/~'a~ ¢~z~ I Physical dimensions and scale of p(oject (fill in dirt ~nsions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owneH or controlled bv project sponsor b. Project acreage to be developed: acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (If a3propriate) e. If the prolect is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion pronosed f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing g. Maximum vehicular trips generated~p, er hour h. If residenua~: Number and wpe of housing units: One Family Two Family Initialk Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) ot largest proposed structure j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare pro~ect will occupy is? acres. acres ultimately. Condominium height; width; length. ft. Multiple Family ; proposed (u ~on completion of project)? (i.e., rock, earth etc3 will be removeo .~m the site? 2. How much natural mat . tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? [Yes {No a. If ves, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [Yes c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes [~No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? ~ acres. $. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this proiect? r-lyes I~No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction / . month~, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated f (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 /:J~ I° month c. Approximate completion date of final phase month d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? []Yes [~No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? [Yes [~No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ~ ; after project ~s complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will prolect require relocation of any projects or facilities? '[~Yes (i~'No If yes, explain veal (including demolition). 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? E3Yes Ji;~No ~. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involve:d? E3Yes [~No Type 14~ Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain []Yes [~No ( 15, Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 ~ ear flood p, lain? 1~Yes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [Yes .~No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facilit'y be used? [Yes E3No c. If yes, gfve name ; Iocatibn d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain [~No [Yes E3No 17 Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of di.' nosal? b. If yes, what ii the anticipated site life? 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? []Yes E3Yes t~No tons/month. years. ~rNo 19 Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour pet dav}? r~Yes 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local .ambient noise levels? 21 Wi project result in an increase in energy use? {)-lYes J~'No If yes , indicate type(s) ~[fNo [Yes II'No 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? F'lyes If Yes, explain gallons/minute. 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board ~]Y~s DNo Ciw,,Town. Village Planning Board DYes DNo City, Town Zoning Board ~2.Yes City, County Health Department DYes [~No Other Local Agencies , DYes DNo Other Regional Agencies [:]Yes EZNo State Agencies ~'Yes DNo Federal Agencies DYes l~No ~ Submittal lype Date C. Zoning and Planning Information I. Does proposed aCtion involve a planning or zoning decision? DYes If Yes. indicate decision required: []zoning amendment f~zoning variance Dspecial use permit E3subdivision L~site plan [new'revision of master plan Dresource management plan Dother 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? ~ ¢-~--~-- 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if develooed as permi,tted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? ~ o__~.--~.~,,,¢ 5. What is the maximum potential develooment of the site if developed as permr/t/ted// by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? '~es DNo 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ~A mile radius of proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a :/~ mile? l;~'Yes DNo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land. how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? E~Yes [~o 11 Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided serwces (recreation. education, police, fire protection]? []Yes ~'No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to hand le projected demand? DYes DNo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? DYes I~No a. If yes. is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? DYes DNo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associate(] with your proposal, please discuss such ~mpacts and the measures whic[: you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the i.~n~tion ~s true to the best of my knowledge. AP~pHc~-~t/S~pnsor Ns~e ~. ~'"~--~:~~ ~ Date //~.~//c~ If the ac~4~6 is in the Coastal Area and you are a state agency, complete th~/Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 Pa,~%2--PROJECT IMPACTS AND Tr~IR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information tRead Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the ~ aestion: Have my resoonses aha determinatjons been reasonable? The reviewer ~s not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · d~nt lying that an impact will.be p0tenta Y arge (co umn 2) does not mean fha it s also necessarily significant. 'Any large impact must be e'vat0~atec~ ]n PART 3 to determine s gnificance. Identifying an imoact in column 2 simpI¥ ~sks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of imoacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But. for any specific project or site other exan" pies aha)or lower thresholds may De appropriate for a Potential Large Impact ~respons~,~ t~h0,s requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each proiect, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Yherefore, the examules are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of imoacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short tern" and cumlative effects. Instructions [Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any mpact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c; If answering Yes to a que~ti~n.t, he~ c~!~ck :the_appropriate box [column 1 or 2) to indicate the notentia~ size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column. 2. If imDact will occur out ~hreshold is Iov~er than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size'of ~th'e impact then consider the imoact as potentially large and oroceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact.checlsed in-column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the pro ~=ct to a small to moderate im aact. also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not aossible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND,_,/ ..... ,, ~ ,., 1, Will the oro~)osed action result in a physical change to the project site? ZINO ~YES Examples that wo~ld apply to cblumn 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%· · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction m a designated floodway. · Other moacts 2. Will there be an effect t:....~y uri.Q ae or unusu.al land forn~s-foui]d on {!he ~? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geolog,i cai formations, etc.jE:]NO-: [~]~Y-E5 · Specific land forms: 6 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate I Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] [:]Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No L-'J [] E~]Yes [~No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No ~ ~ ' ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes '~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~*es UNo IMPACT ON WATER , ' :,-.:~ ........ *;,~.~,~--- .' 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as orotected? (Under Articles 15, 24. 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law. ECL) FINO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more th~n 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · C0nstrucdon in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other mpacts: L 4. Will prOposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? [qNO E]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Constru :don of a bod~ of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5. Will Prooosed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? []NO I~y[ S Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will reouire a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source ot water that does not have approval tO serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capaclt-¢. · Construction or operabon causing any contammatiorr of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presentlv do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water n excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likel~ cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the exte?,t that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will reauire the storage of petroleum ar chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer serwces. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and or storage facilities. · Other ~mpacts: 6 Will proposed action alter drainage flow or pa[terns, or surface water runoff? I~NO FqYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 ~ 2 3 Sma. il,to Potentiat Can Impact Be ?"ModeCate La[ge .-" Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] ' I []Yes I-]No [] [] [~Yes []No [] [] [] Yes [] No [] [] I~¥es ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No i ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No i ~ ~ ~Yes ~No · Prooosed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing draina§e patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will pror~osed action affect air quality? liNC [YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in ~nv given hour, · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of mc'e than 1 ton of refuse per hour, · Emission rate ct total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 mil ion BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Prooosed action will allow an increase in the densit'/ of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other m~pacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS L Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? [NO E~YE$ Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal fist, using the site, over or near szte or found on me site, . Removal of any portior of -a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ~NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Pronosed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or m~grator¥ fish, shellfish or wildlife species. Proposed Action requires the removM of mere than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age] or other [cea]Iv important IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Will the Proposed Action affect agricu Itural hand resources? [NO [YES Examples that would apply to column 2 The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural %nd [includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 ' 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate "' Large M1Hgated By Impact Impact Project Changp, [] [] []Yes [] ~ ~Yes ~No [] [] ~Yes []No [] [] ~Yes []No I [] Ell []]Yes [']No [] [] []Yes []]No [] [] []]Yes []No [] [] ~JYes ~]No [] El FgYes []No [] [] []]Yes []No [] [] ~Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] ~Ws []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] E]Yes []No [] [] []Yes []]No [] ~ [] EYes []No C-= · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or. if located in an Agricu]tutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The prooosed'actipn would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping]; or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a tarm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff] · Other impacts: . IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? []NO EZ]YES (if necessary, use the Visual FAF Addendum ic Section 617.21, Appendix Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviousl,, different from or in shard contrast to current surrodnding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Pronosed land u~es. or prolect com oonents visible to users of aesthetic resources which wilt eliminate or significandv reduce their enjo~ ment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Prolect components that will result in the elimination or s~gnificant screening of scemc views known to be imaortant to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Wil Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ONO ~]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed Ioca ted within the project s'ite. · ?roDosed'Action wil] occur m an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. * Other impacts: .. IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open soaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would aDDIv tO COlumn 2 [:]NO ~]YES L ~ The permanent foreclosure of future recreational a opportunity. · A maior reduction of an open space rmoortant to the community · Other impacts: 1... 2 3 ~mall:'~o POtential" Can Impact Be Moderate- Large M t gate,d By Impact Impact Project C'nange [] ~] ~]Yes [~]No [] [] [~Yes []No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Ves ~o ~ ~ ~Ye~ ~o ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Ves ~No I ~ ~ ~Ves ~No ~ [ ~ ~w~ ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No IMPACT ON Tr...NSPORTATION 14. Will there be an etfect to existing transportation systems~ ~JNO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteratior~ of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 1.5. Wil proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply~ ~NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · ?roposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. · ProPosed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS Will there be objectionable odors noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action,~ ~JNO ~]YES £xam pies that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1.500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facditv. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · Pronosed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise c 4tside of structures. · Prolapsed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a no~se screen. ' Other ~mpacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 7. WiJJ Proposed Action affect public health and safety? t~NO OYES [xamples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances [i.e. oil. pesticides, chemicals, ~adiation, etc,) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic ]ow level discharge or emission, Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any Jorm (i.e toxic poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural :;as or other flammable liouids. Pro~]osed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance .vithin 2.000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous ,¥aste. ©t h~,r impacts: 10 Small toI~ Potential C~n Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact ~mpact Proiect Chang~ [] [] [:]Yes ~No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] ~]Yes []No ~ ~ ~Ves ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~No iMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHAR ,AO~ER OF COMMUNITY OR; NEIGHI3ORHO~'~ '~ ' 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing communitv? r-TNO [~YES I:xamples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely ~o grow by more than 5%, · The munici:~a] budget for capital expenditures or operating serwces will increase by more than'S% per year as a result of this nrolect, · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted olans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the dens t'y of land use. · Proposed Action witl replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services [e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future prolects · Prooosed Action wi create or eliminate emolovment. · Other impacts: ~1~ 2 ', 3, $ aJJ to Potentia~,~ Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact impact Project Change [] [] ~]Yes ~No [] '1-1 [~Yes ~No [] [] [~Yes ~No [] [] E3Yes ~No [] ~ ~Yes ~N0 ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Ves ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No 19 Is there, or ts mere likely To be. public controvers~ related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ~NO ~YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 _L Part _3--EVALUATION OF THE I?JiPORTANC~ OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if th~ impact~s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact ideDtified i~ Column 2 of Part 2: I Briefly describe the im.~act. 2. Describe (if applicable~ how the impac~ could be mtigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information availagle, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this imnact is important, To answer the ¢ Jesuon of imoortance, consider: · The probability of the ~mpact occurring · The duration of the ~mpact · Its irreversibilit¥, including oermanentlv lost resources of value · Whether the rmoact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the ~mpact · Its potential divergence from local needs aha goals · Whether known objections to ~ne prolec~ relate Eo this [mnact. (Continue on attacnrr~nts} 11 . Appendix B State Env:ronrne~tal Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional nformation relating to Question 1] of Part 2 of the Full EAF. {To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) ] Would the project be visible from: · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural- or man-made scenic qualities? · An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation.'enjoyment and appreciation of natural or mammade scenic qualities? · A site or structure listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places? · State Parks? · The State Forest Preserve? · National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? · National Nature Landmarks and other outstanding natural features? · National Park Service lands? · Rivers designated as National or State Wild. Scenic or Recreational? · Any tra.nsportation corridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? · A governmentally established or designated interstate or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? · A site. area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic? · Municipal park. or designated open space? · County road? · State? · Local road? 0-1/4 I~-V2 I/2-3 3-5 5+ [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 2. Is the visibilky of the project seasonal? ~i.e.. screen'ed by summer foliage, but visible during omar seasons) [~Yes Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time ol~ year during which the project will be visibi e? ~]Yes ~]No DESCRIPTION Ob EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1~ check those which generally describe the surrounmng environment. Within '1/4 mile "~ 1 mile Essentially undeveloped [] [] Forested [] [] Agricultural [] [] Suburban residential [] [] Industrial [] [] Commercial [] [] Urban [] [] River, Lake, Pond [] [] Cliffs, Overlooks [] [] Designated Open Space [] [] Flat [] [] Hilly [] [] Mountainous [] [] Other .. [] ~ NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *V~ mile []Yes E~No '1 miles []Yes ~No *2 miles []Yes []No *3 miles []Yes []No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate EXPOSURE 6. The annual number 6f viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the Proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidaysl Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel t¢ and from work [~ F~ C ~ Involved in recreational activities [] [] ~ [] Routine travel by residents [] [] C ~ At ~ residence ~ C [] [] At worksite [] [] C ~ Other [] [] [] [] WR-11 ~Vloved by Allan Connell. seconded by Stephen Angell. itwas RESOLVED to recommend to the SouthOld Town Board of Trustees DENIAL of the Waiver Request of CINDY BENEDETTO 35-5-26 concerning the revised plans for a previous request. Will not put in a patio and will instead put in a concrete walkway around the addition to obtain easier access to the new concrete basement steps. The CAC recommends denial because there should be no concrete. The Council recommends and would approve any surface (brick. gravel, bluestone, etc.) that would allow water to percolate into the ground. 910 Maple Lane Vote of Council: Ayes: Ail Motion carried. WR-12 Moved by Allan Connell. seconded by Stephen Angell. it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees DENIAL of the Waiver Request of ANN BERRYMAN 18-2-1 to construct a 6' high vinyl fence along western property line a minimum of 55' long. Fence would extend onto the beach to prevent pedestrian traffic and keep deer from cutting through property and eroding beach. Denial was recommended because no need is demonstrated for the proposed action. The installation of a fence could create an erosion problem. 2100 Youngs Road. Orient Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. WR-13 Moved by Bruce Loucka. seconded by Betty Wells. it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVAL of the Waiver Request of ~P[ERR'E GAZARIAN 26-2-[[7 to build a fence with gate at stairs on top of the bulkhead. 860 Willow Terrace Lane. Orient Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. WR-I~ Moved by Bruce Loucka. seconded by Betty Wells. it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees Waiver Request of DAVID AND CLAIRE AIRE 2[[-1-27 to install a '[[' along the southerly property line on top of the retaining wall. Village Lane. Orient Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion car;tied. APPROVAL of the high picket fence Page Albert J. Krupski, President John Holzapfel, Vice President William G. Albertson Martin H. Garrell Peter Wenczel BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 June 1, 1994 Pierre Gazarian 860 Willow Terrace Orient, NY 11957 Lane RE: SCTM ~1000-26-2-47 Dear Mr. Gazarian: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Board of Trustees on Thursda!~, May 26, 1994; RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of. ~rustees ~~~ ~ amendment to permit $4150 to construct ~ ~nce on top of an existing bulkhead. Applicant must have a 10' - 15' non-turf area landward of bulkhead. Located 860 Willow Terrace Lane, Orient. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, President, Board of Trustees AJK:jmd cc: Bldg. Dept. CAC Albert J. Krupski, President John Holzapfel, Vice President William G. Albertson Martin H. Garrell Peter Wenczet Town Hall 53095Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 17, 1994 Bruce Loucka Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council $outhold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Loucka, Transmitted herewith are the following applications for a wetland permit: William Childs Oscar Blevins Donald Bayles Barbara Cieplinski Theresa Casamisina Cindy Benedetto Ann Berr!rrman Susan Tsavaris Linton Duell Pierre Gazarian David & Ann Air SCTM ~145-4-2.1 SCTM %104-5-23 SCTM %57-1-16.1 SCTM %89-3-9 & p/o 8.1 SCTM %57-2-19 SCTM $35-5-26 SCTM $18-2-1 SCTM %30-2-53 SCTM $24-2-12 SCTM $26-2-47 SCTM $24-1-27 Please prepare a written report of findings and recommendations with respect to these applications. ~ tru ours Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK/djh Board of Trustees Southold Town ~r. Albert J. Krupski, President ~ain Road Southold, N.Y. 11871 Jr. 9, 1994 Gentlemen, ~z~xa~/~_~_/~ I would appreciate your granting me ., that I may build a fence on top of the bulkhead on my property at 860 Willow Terrace Lane, Orient. The purpose of the fence is to prevent anyone, but especially children, from falling to the beach below the bulkhead. The fence is to be 42 inches high and it will either be a wood picket fence or a fence of cedar boards and turkey wire. At the top of the stairs to the beach the fence will have a 4 foot-high gate with some portion of 4 foot-high fence on eikher side to conform to Town code covering swimming pool access. Everywhere else the combined height of the bulkhead and of the 42 inches fence will be more than adequate to meet Town requirements. (The fence is included in the plan approved by the Department of Environmental Conservation). I am encloslng a map showing the location of the proposed fence and a check in the amount of 40 dollars. Thank you for your kind attention. Sincerely, P.O. Box 5 Orient, N.Y. 11957 Tel: 323-2722 Project Date The Southold Town Tr~Lls_tee office has de'termined that your application for ~o_q~tal erosl~n/wettand~is ~]piete~ please consider the following infQrmation in th£s re~or any required return submissicn: ote~ Represen~tive ~ CC: -S~iu-i~d cf Appea~ls t~nnmei~ea~icn A. :.~ . . ~ ~ ~'1 This notice makes no claim with respect to other jurisdictions within or outside the Town of Southold with respect to permits, permission required. 4/92 New York State Department. of Thomas C. Jorlln~ Commissioner RE:, LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST The purpose of this reouest is to determine under Article 8 (State Environ- mental Quality Review - SEQR) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your agency's interest in acting as lead agency; 2. Your agency's jurisdiction in the action described below; and 3. Issues of concern which your agency, believes should be evaluated. Enclosed is a copy of the permit application and a completed Part 1 of the Environmental Assessment Form to assist you in responding. Project Location: ~0 ~.)~ou~ -~rr~_~ DEC Project Number: SEqR Classification: DEC Contact Person: DEC Position: DEC has no oojection to your agency or another agency assuming lead agency status for this action, but reserves the right to comment on this action if a positive determination of significance is made. [ ] DEC has no objection to your a~ency~or another agency assuming lead agency status for this action, but we have the following concerns regarding this project {see "comments" beloW).' [ ] DEC wishes to assume lead agency st~S fop this action. [] The proposed action has been identified by DEC as occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to a critical environmental area {CEA) that was designated by It is the position of this Department that your agency, if it has a juris- diction over the action, should assume the lead agency role based on the existence of the CEA and the fact that the anticipated impacts are primarily of local significance. Other. (See comments below) Response: Please respond ~o this request within 30 days of the date of this letter. If no response is.received within 30 days, we will assume that you have no objection to DEC or another agency assuming the rote of lead agency, and have no comments to offer regarding the proposed action at this time. If neither your agency nor any other involved agency, including DEC, has indicated a will- ingness to serve as lead agency within 30 days of this letter: [ ] We will petition the Commissioner of DEC to designate a lead agency for this action. [ ] We will petition the Commissioner of DEC to designate your agency as lead, presuming you have jurisdiction. Please feel free to contact this office for further information or discussion. Sincerely, Enclosures fl) rK C cc: (see distribution list) · TRUSTEES Joh~ M. Bi'edenie3~er III,,Pmsident John B. Tuthill lti~ G. ~berts6n TeI~phon¢ ¢i6) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN' TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR Town Hall 53095 Main Road r.o, BOx n,9_ So~old, N~ York 11971 S~E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE ~DECLAi~ATI ON NOTICE OF NO SIGNIFICANT. EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT APPLICATION NO. 1.000-26-2-47 '' Chapt. NAME: PierreGazarian Chapt. DATE: January 28, 1993 97 - Wetlands 37 - Coastal Erosion Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency whichmay also have an application pending for the same or similar pro~ect. ~ planting survey shall be submitted prior to final approval. TYPE OF ACTION: Type I DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: to replace bulkhead damaged by storm. Bulkhead to line up with neighbors bulkhead. -LOCATION:SCTM ~1000~26-2-47 REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERF~NATION: 1. An on site inspection has been conducted by the Board of Trustees. 2. An environmental assessment~ submitted by the applioant ~md reviewed and completed by the'Board of Trustees, has indicated that no significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur should the project, be implemented as planned. cc: CAC ¥/I Lt.OSw' T'EI~.Ed,~CE- L/kNE~