Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
4882
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman James Dinizio, Jr. Lydia A. Tortora Lora S. Collins George Horning BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road RO. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 765-1809 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF DECEMBER 7, 2000 Appl. No. 4882 - LAV-COR AGRICULTURAL, INC. STREET & LOCALITY: 31320 Main Road, Cutchogue 1000-103-1-19.11and 19.2 DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: December 7, 2000 FINDINGS OF FACT PROPERTY FACTS: Applicant's property comprises 27 acres on the south side of Main Road in Cutchogue with 565 feet of road frontage. It is largely planted in grapes. Existing buildings, all near Main Road, are a farmstand, farmhouse, garages and several barns including one used for wine making and one used as a tasting room. The property is zoned Business for a depth of 300 feet from Main Road, and otherwise R-80. BASIS OF APPEAL: Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval, dated September 20, 2000, denying a permit to construct a new tasting-storage-office building because the building would be 203 feet wide. Code section 100-103C provides that in the Business zone, "no single structure shall have more than sixty linear feet of frontage on one street." AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant requests a variance authorizing the dimensions of a 203-foot-wide building as proposed in the construction plans submitted with the building permit application. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION, DESCRIBED BELOW: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspection, the Board makes the following findings: (1) The proposed building will replace the existing tasting barn and will add storage and shipping areas that applicant states are very badly needed. The proposed fagade has several visually distinct segments, reflecting the different activities within. The architect's stated intent is to create the impression of a cluster of different buildings. Applicant states that having a single building for the different activities will enhance efficiency and reduce lot coverage and the amount of roadway needed on the property. Alternate sitings for the building, to obviate the need for a variance, would require destruction of significant amounts of mature grapevines. (2) The proposed building will be more than 200 feet from the road and will be screened by trees. The addition of the building should upgrade the visual environment of the neighborhood, which is dominated by substantial commercial uses on the south Page 2 - December 7, 2000 Appl. No. 4882- Lav-Cor Agricultural, Inc. Southold Town Board of Appeals side of Main Road. The building, while large, is not monolithic. Its size is consistent with other wineries in Southold Town, and reflects the nature of the winery use. The proposed traffic plan should reduce road congestion by moving the winery entrance, now located directly across from a shopping center entrance, well to the east. For these reasons, grant of the requested vadance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or detriment to nearby properties. (3) There is no evidence that grant of the requested variance will have an adverse effect or impact on physical or environmental conditions. (4) Grant of the requested variance is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable applicant to implement its expansion plan while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION/ACTION: On motion by Member Collins, seconded by Chairman Goehringer, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the requested variance, authorizing construction of the proposed building as described in the application made to this Board, including screening as recommended by the Planning Board, subject to the CONDITION that there no be obstruction to vision at the entrance and exits to the property, and screening shall not exceed a height of 2-1/2 feet above the average street level within an isosceles triangle having three-foot sides along each street to preserve sight lines for traffic. VOTE OF THE BOARD: AYES: Members (Chairman) Goehdnger, Tortora, Collins, and Homing (Member Dinizio was absent.) This Resolution was duly adopted (4-0). ,,~?GERARD P. GOEHRING , ~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2000 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and Chapter 100 (Zoning), Code of the Town of Southold, the following application will be heard at a public headng by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971, on THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2000, at the time noted below (or as soon thereafter as ~ossible): 7:45 p.m. Appl. No. 4882 - LAV-COR AGRICULTURAL INC. (Peconic Bay Winery). Applicant ~s requesting: (a) an Interpretation of Article X, Section 100-103C determining the yard area of the proposed "accessory Wine Tasting building" to be a rear yard instead of a front yard based on the definitions of Section 100-13; and/or (b) a vadance under Article X, Section 100-103C, for a new Wine Tasting barn, in addition to the existing winery production building, which, based on the Building Department's September 20, 2000 Notice of Disapproval, is proposed for an overall length exceeding 60 ft. frontage facing the Main Road (State Route 25), Cutchogue; Parcel 1000-103-1-19.2 and 19.11. The Board of Appeals will at the above time and place hear all persons or their representative desiring to be heard or to submit wdtten statements (before the hearing is concluded). This headng will not start eadier than designated. Files are available for review during regular Town Hall business hours (8-4 p.m.). If you have questions, please do not hesitate to call (631) 765-1809. Dated: October 31, 2000. GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 TO hTO. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE~eptem~~ Ronald Gray A/C Lav-Cor Agricultural, Inc. 2228 Montauk Hwy. Box 1768 Bridgehampton NY 11932 Please take notice that your application dated August 31, 2000 For permit for winery tasting barn at Location of property 31320 Main Road Cutchogue County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 103 Block 1 Lot 19.11&19.2 Subdivision Filed Map # Lot # Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds proposed project in B Zone not permitted purauant to Article X Section 100-103C which states; A project ahall be divided into separate structures so that no single structure shall have more than sixty (60) linear feet of frontage on one (1) street. The setbacks of multiple structures on a parcel may vary_, provided that the average setback of the structures meets the setback required above and all buildinas are at least seventy-five (75) feet from the right-of-way. Proposed structure shown at +/- 203 feet in length along fromage on Main Road. '~-'-~thoriz~ -FORM NO. ] TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN IIALL SOUTHOLD~ N.Y. 1197! TEl.: 765-1802 gxanined ................. , 20 .... Approved ................. , .... Permit No ................. D~sappmved arc SURVEY ........................ CHECK ......................... SEPTIC FORH ................... DEC ........................... TRUSTEES ...................... NOTIFY: CALL ............ · ...... MAIL TO: .................... (Building Inspector) APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PER}tIT INSTRUCTIONS Da ~e.;~ugllst. 3.L. .... a. 'IbiS application must be coupletely filted in by typewriter or in ink and mthnitted to the Building Inspector 3 sets of plms, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according, to schedule. b. Plot plan st~wing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining, pr~ni~es or public streets or areas, and giving, a detailed description of layont of property mst be dra~a tau the diagran ~aiah is part of this application. c. lhe turk covered by this application my not be cemented before issuance of Building Pemit. d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building, Pemit to the applleant. Such permit stroll be kept on C~e },,~,,ises availt~ble for inspection thmughmc the work. e. No building shall be occupied or used in ~hole or in part for any ixwpose ~hatever until a Certificate of Occupancy shall have been granted by the Building Inspector. APPLICATICtt IS l~ Mt~E to the Building, l)eparment for the issuance of a Building Permit parsuanr to the Building Zone Ordlnar~e of the Tc~u of Southold, .%ffolk Coanty, [qe~ York, and other applicable La~, Ordinances'or Regulations, for the construction of building.s, additions or alterations, or for ten, vol or d~olicica, as herein descrl .b~d. 'ibc applicant agrees to .c~ply with all applicable la~, ord, ja~ces,, builaing, ceeb, ~in~ mae, ~a ..... .............. (Signature of applicant, & none, if~h d~rporation) c/o Graystone Builders 2228. ~a.uLauk. I-I iqh~a.~ ,..Box. l. Tfi 8 ......... (Mailing address of applicant)f{.~/)f3~- _ /{/~/_ Bridgehampton, NY 11932~ - State ~hether applicant is oaner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder. ................. .G. ~.~ .ex g J,..qgllg~Ogg~.r ............................................................................ Na~e of c~er of premises , .l~.~y.qq).r,. ~,g t(l g.g J-.t~g.K~..qgXP... ,..?~ ~. ~qK~[X~.,.. ~Bg .......................... ~ (~ ~ ~ ~ax mll~lates~ d~) If applic~t is a co~ntim, si~mre of~t~ri~ officer. .................. (~ a~ title o~rate of[i~r) Builders Licer~se No...SRff.0Jok..Co..$..5368HI Ph~l~rs License No .......................... Electricians License No ...................... Otber Trade's Licar~,e No ................ ..... ~5'~-l- Harbor Lane, Cutchogue, NY [tense Nmber Street Hmnlet County Tax Map No. JGCO Section ...1/23 ......... Block ..0.1 ........... Lot 19,.ll.aj2ck.19.2 (combined subdivision ...................................... Fiied Map NO ................ I~t ............... 7/2000) 2. State existing u.~e aid occupancy of pr~aises anti intended use ~ occupancy of proposed construction: Storage, Vineyard, _ Removed 3. ~nre of ~rk (d~eck ~dd~ applicable): Ne~ I~fildi~ . .X ...... ~i~i~ .......... Akerati~ .......... ~ir ............ ~ .... X ....... ~li~i~ ............ Od~r ~ .................................. ~rip~i~) ~. ~ti,~t~ ~s~ $1,350,000.00 f~ $25.00 (to ~ ~id m filing this a~li~ti~) 5. I[ ~lli~, ~r o~ ~lli~ ~its ............ ~r of ~lling mits ~ e~ flmr ................ If garage, ~r of cars ...................................... Re~ail Bev - 7,152 s~ 5. If I~i~ss, ~rcial or ~ m~, sl~i~ ~ture ~ ~tent o[ ea& ~ o~ ~.~.~.q~..y..~.~.~. Sf , , Storaoe 7 5,196 sf 7. Di~mnsia~ of ~isti~T~{~s,B~y: ~t 24.4 ~ar 24.4 ~pth 50.4 I~ t [~prox 20' . '~ ...................... ~r o~ Stories .¢ ............... l.qgber structure D~ms as no}ed D~i~ o[ ~m st~e ~th alteratlms or ~iti~s: ~t ............... ~ar ....... ~. ~pfl~ .................... ~i~t .................... ~r o[ Stories ............... 8. Dimmi~ of enti[e ~ ~st~tim: F~t ~9!:L~.' ....... ~ .g~.-.~.: .... ~,m .M,.~.' ..... t~i~t 29.0' R~r o~ Stories 2 ~. si~ ,~ot: ~t 2¢1,~.~ ........... ~ .... 7~.~:3~ ........ ~p~, ..1~37.0,.~ ....... I0. ~te of ~d~a~ ..~P.q~ ~.. ~.~9.~ ~ o~ Fomr ~r . ~X. ~ ........................... II. ~ or ~ district in ~id~ pr~i~s 12. ~s ~ mt~ti~ violate any ~i~ 1~, o~i~e or r~ladm: .X~.~..~.Q]..f~O~Rffo dimens. 13. ~ill lot ~ ~ ..Y~ ............... ~ill~ss ~ill ~ ~.~ ~: ~ m X ~avcor agricultural, Inc.0_%~ ,o~g[~Nvresent, Davidoff&~alito 14. ~ o~r of ~, .au~.hoaer. r~ ....... ~res~c~O~[¢_.[.XO.~-~Y~lfll~ ~212)557- / rays~zone ~u~laers ' '72'0~"" NY 11932 (631) 55'52'f~'f~ .... PLOT DIAGRAM l~cate clearly a*d diatlmtly all buildings, ~O~r extstl~g or pm~, ~ ~Ce all ~t-~ d~i~ flu, p~r~ li~s. Gi~ st~t ~ bl~ ~r or/~ripti~ ~ing to ~, ~ ~ strut ~s ~ i~i~te ~r interior or ~r lot. · / duly ~m, deFeRs and .says that he is tim applicant MICHELE PHILLIPS Notar/Publlo, State of New York No: 01PH5083877 Qualified In Suffolk County Commission Exo. Auo. 11. I1~ is the ............ '~ "* '44.~.~. (Co~trra~or. a~tor, agent, corporate officer, etc.) o~ ~d ~r or ~rs. a~ is duly ~tl~riz~ to ~rfom or h~ ~rf~ O~ ~id ~ m~ to m~ a~ file .this a~licatia~; ~t att star--nra c~tai~ in ~is a~licatlm, am tn~ to O~e Imst o[ h[s ~1~ ~ ~lief~ a~ -L.7 ......... /PPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR ,~,~_~.~..~. ~...,~.?.~,...~..~.....~. ,,DATE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR'S DECISION APPEALED: ................... TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: I (We) ....... .'.'~'. ............... ' (Appellant) #(~/~Q .~,'.~'/Z~,'Z-~ /,~ .,~ l..) · k~ ~ ~~~. +./~.~ .................. (Tel o, ....... ............ , ........ 0A E0 HEREBY APPEAL THE DECISION OF THE WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED...~[.~.. FOR: RECEIVED ~ Permit to Build ( ) Permlf for Occupancy ( ) Permitfo Use OCT - ( ) Permit for As-Built . . ~ ~~mg~ c~ff.~.~.~...t..Zone ..~... /. ~ocatlon of Properly ......... ~ ................. .x...;cC/.~'~""Z .... .'~ District 1000 Secflon../.~.Block~X..Lot(s)./.~:/.t~.(~:~....~urrent ~wner ......................... 2. Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (lndicGte A~lcle, SeCtion, Subsection and paragraph of Zoning Ordnance by numbers. Do not quote the I'~w.) Article .~... S~ction 300- ~....$ub-Secflofl ...~ ......... 3. Type of Appeal. Appeal Is made herewith for: (~X') A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) A Variance due to lack of access as required by New YorkTown Law Chap. 62, Cons. Laws Art. 16, Section 280-A. ~ Interpretation of Article ..,'~ ..... Sectlon 100-/.~...~... ..... ( ) Reversal or Other: ................................................................................................ 4. Previous Appeal. A previous appeal (has) (has not) been made with respect fo this property or wlfh respect fo this decision of the Building Inspector (Appeal # ...... Year ....... ). REASONS FOR APPEAL (Additional sheets may be used with applicant's slqnature~: AREA VARIANCE REASONS: (1) An undesirable change will not be produced In the CHARACTER of the nelghborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, if granted, because: (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or Impact on the physical environmental conditions In the neighborhood or dlstrlct because: or (5) Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? ( ) Yes, or ( ) No. This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the community. ( ) Check this box if USE VARIANCE STANDARDS/~q~ompleted and attached. Sworn to before, me ~. ....... 20 ~(-~ (Agent must submit Authorization from Owner) ~ /a~ Cf .,~-- r~ls (Slgnature of Appellant or Authorized Agent) ZSA~t ~ ~ O. 02GR6021013 - ~ ~ N~ Yo~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD OWNER STREET '.~ ! ~ '.Z ~'~ VILLAGE DI~.I SUB. LOT , E AC~ ~- ~' .' FO~ROWN~ N~i~ ~d~-~FD ~n~ -~o ~'.~'~ ~/[-~' · ~lU~ ~ ~O- ~ S W CODE DATEOF CON.RUCTION ~ND I~P. TOTA DATE R~RKS (.~00 ~ff~O g~O0 /'~/,/~ ~-~ .S~'~ -~,~ Z4 ~ ~. U~,.,., ~.O~C-(~'~'~ . ~oo moo lz.~ / ,I./~ ~'/~ ~j~ ~',~,.,,.~.,.,u ,~,~.~,~,~ ~,',,~- - ~ ,, *~ " z~ ~' W~I.nd FRONTAGE ON ROAD ' , I J Total ~ ~ / [ Extension Extension Extension Porch Deck Gamge O.B. Foundation Bath Basement ~ Floors Ext. Walls ~/c ~ Interior Finish Fire Place ~ Heat Pool Attic Patio Rooms 1st Floor Driveway Rooms 2nd Floor TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD OWNER STREET :"~'~-I ~'~-"~ VILLAGE DI~. SOB. LOT R~ S~S. VL :AR~ CO~. CB. MICS, Mkt. Valu~ ~ND IMP. TOTAL gATE R~RKS Extension Extension Porch ~ ,~ ~,"j : Porch Breezeway Garage OaS. Total COLOR ~//~, 7 TRIM Foundation Basement Ext. Walls Fire Place Type Roof Recreation Room Dormer Both Floors Interior Finish He~t Rooms 1st Floor Rooms 2nd Floor Drivew~/ inette LR. DR. )~ ?~ ELIZABETH A~ . NEVILLE · x TOWN CLERK ~ REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 20, 2001 The Southold Town ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE will meet on Tuesday~ February 27~ 2001 at 4:00 P.M. in the Conference Room at Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York. AGENDA Continuation of Peconic Bay Winery, Cutchogue Review of Breezy Sound Resort Motel, Greenport ~Neville Southold Town Clerk Committee Members Town Board Town Attorney Chief of Police Supt. of Highways Departments Newspapers Radio News 12 OCOUNTY OF SUFFOLK DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals SUFFOLK COUNIY EXECUTIVE December 26, 2000 Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A 14-14 to 23 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the following application(s) submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is/are considered to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact(s). A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or a disapproval. Applicant(s) Municipal File Number(s) Baxter (William)/Sprint Spectrun~, L.P. Lav-Cor Agricultural Inc.* Goodale, Richard W.* Caselnova, Ralph & Catherine 4862 4882 4888SE 4889 **Premises should be encumbered by appropriate developmental restrictions, particularly as set forth by the Z.B.A. Very truly yours, Harold J. Withers Deputy Director of Planning S/s Gerald G. Newman Chief Planner GGN:cc G:ICCHORNYIZONING~ZONING\WORKING~LD2000\DEC\SD4§62 DEC LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H. LEE DENNISON BLDG - 4TH FLOOR · P O. BOX 6100 · (516) 853-5190 I O0 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY I 1788-0099 TELECOPIER (5 I 6) 853 4044 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD (1- 631) 765-i809 tei. (1-631) 765-9064 fax Pursuant to Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, The Board of ..Appeals of the T~wn of Southold, New York, hereby refers the following to t~e Suffolk County P~anning C~m~ssion: XX __ Variance from the Zoning Code, Article X , Section lO0-1O3C __ Variance from Determination of Southold Town Building Inspector ~Special Exception, Article , Section Special Permit Appeal No: 4882 Applicant: Lav-Cor Agricultural Inc. Location of Affected Land:21320 Main Rd., Cutchogue County Tax Map Item No.: 1000- 102-1-19.1 and 19.2 Within 500 feet of: _ 'Town or Village Boundary Line Body of Water (Bay, Sound or Estuary) State or County Road, Parkway, Highway, Thruway Boundary of Existing or Proposed County, State or Federally Owned Land 8oundary of Existing or Proposed County, State or Federal Park or other Recreation Area ' _ Existing or Proposed Right-of-Way of any Stream or Drainage Channel Owned b the County or for which the County has established Channel Lines, or . . Within One Mile of a Nuclear Power Plant __ Within One Nile of an Airport Comments: Applicant is requesting permission., to construct a new- test±rig -storage-off±ce'build±rig wh±ch would be 203 ft'. wide Copies of Town file and related documents enclosed for your revi~ Dated: Dec. 21, 2000 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman James Dinizio, Jr. Lydia A. Tortora l-ora S. Collins George Homing BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 765-1809 December 19, 2000 Mr. Robert Lurid Robert Lurid Associates Architects, Ltd. P.O. Box 1134 Wainscott, NY 11975 Re: Variance Application #4882 - Lav-Cor Agricultural, Inc. Dear Mr. Lund: Enclosed please find a copy of the Board's determination rendered at its December 7, 2000 Meeting which granted alternative relief, as noted. A copy of the Board's determination was transmitted yesterday to the Planning Board Office and to the Building Department for their update regarding your application requesting site plan approval and a building permit. Wishing you, your family, and your staff a very Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! Very truly yours, Enclosure Copy of Decision to: Building Department Planning Board Office Linda Kowalski PLAN~'ING ~OARD MEMBERS~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. ~. ,_; RICHARD CAGGIANO Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Town Hail, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax (631) 765-3136 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. tssues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Project Name: Requested Action: Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I 09, Unlisted Contact Person: .'~, ~". (516) 765-1938 Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (ELS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (~/,..) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Si.j[~erely, Chairman CC; Board of Appeals B~ Building Department Southold Town Board Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook ~,y Cu, ~ cf New Yo~ State Depa~ment of Tmnspodation · ho~ybu;~ki, Gre~ Public Utilities Suffolk County Water Authority *Maps are enclosed for your review rev. 4/94 617.21 SEQR Appendix A State Environmental Qualily Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The lull ~AF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine m an orderly manner, whether a prelect or action may be significant The question of whether an action may be significant ~s not always easy to answer Frequent- [y. there are aspects of a project that are subiectwe or unmeasureable It is also understood that those who determine s~gndicance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert m enwronmental analysis In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be awareof the broader concerns affecting the question of s~gnificance The tull [,~,F ~sintended to provide a method whereby apphcantsand agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive ,n nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a prelect or action FuEl EAF Components: The full EAF ,s compr,sed of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information abOut a gwen prolect and ~ts site. By identifyin§ basic prolect data, ~t assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3 Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action It provides guidance as to whether an ~mpact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it ~s a pdtentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be miugated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed tot this project: ~ Part 1 ][~] Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this [AF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 it appropriate), and any other su~pportmg information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A The proiect will not result in any large and important impact(s) and. therefore, is one which will not have a significant ~mpact on the environment, therefore a negalive declaration will be prepared. [] B Although the project could have a signif'icant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures, described iff PART 3 have been required. therefore a CONDITIONED ne§~tive declaratio, will be p~epared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more .large and.important impacts tbat may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive decla~atio~ will :be prepared. · A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only va[id for UnJisted Actions Peconic Bay Winery - New Tastin~ Barn Name of Action Print or Type Name of Responsib[e Oilicer i;, Lead Al:ency Title of Responsible Of[ice[ Si~,nature of Responsible Offic,..'r in Lead A~4~.ncy Signature pi I'reparer(If ddferent from responsible officer) Date 1 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Spons NOTICE: This documenl ~s designed to assist in determining whether the acuon proposed mav have a significant effe on the environment PIease complete the entire form. Parts /\ throu~4h E Answers to these questions will be consider~ a~ part of the applicat'on for approval and may be sublect to lurther veri~icat:on and public rewew Provide any addition information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and ) It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on ,nforma(~on currently ava,lable and will not invoh new studies, research or ~nvest,gation If information requiring such ~ddit,onal work is unavailable so indicate and spec~ each instance NAME OF ACTION Peconic Bay Winery - New Tasting Barn LOCATION OF ACTION (Include SJreel Address. Municipality and CounW) 31320 Main Road, Cutchoque, NY 11935 Robert Land - REA Architects t 63~ 537-1414 - AOORESS c/o Graystone Builders 2282 Montauk Highway, PO Bo× 1768 CITY/PO i STATE iZIPCOO5 Bridgehampton NY 11932 Paul Lowerre - Lavcor Agricultural, Inc. i ~ 212 557-7200 ext ^0O~ESS 2 8 2 c/o Howard Presant, Davidoff & Malito, 605 Third Ave, 34th Floor New York ! NYt 10158 OESCRIPTION OF ACTION Construction. of a new 10,259 sq. ft. Tasting Barn with Offices, and Storage. Removal of the existing 2,459 sq. ft. Tasting Barn with Offices and Storage. Removal of the existing gravel parking lot and construction of a new asphalt parking lot. Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: [~Urban [2]industrial (~Commercial ~.R_:._es..idential (suburban) [~Rural (non-far~ [2]Forest gOAgricultu~e 2. Total acreage of project area: 2'~;031 acres APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow pr 8rushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, crc.) 23. 885 acres 22. 731 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 2,1. 25 of ECl.} acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unve~getated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces 1.018 acres 1.404 acres Oth~ (Indicate type) T, nnd~c'~pp 2.128 acres 2 . 896 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainal~e: ~Well drained 100. % of site (~]Moderately well drained __ % of site I~Pood,,' <{raim.d % -f site b. If any agricultural la,id is involved, bow many acres of stol are ('lassificd within ~oil group I through .1 of the N Land Classification System? acres (See I NYCRR 370) Unknown 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ~Yes ,.~. What is depth to bedrock? ~.~,. (in toot) 2 Registers of Historic Places? OYes X~No 8 What is the depth of the water table~ _ .,16 (in teet) below grade at proposed building OYes ]~]No According to 12 Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i e, cliffs, dunes, other geological ~ormations) ~Yes ~No Describe 13 Is the project >ire presently used by the commumty or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? OYes ~J~SNo If yes, explain 14 Does the present site include scenic v,ews known to be important to the community? OYes ~]No 15 Streams within or contiguous to protect area: N.~. a Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16 Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a Nam~l~J~, b Size {In acres} 17. ts the site served by existing public utilities? [~Yes a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? b) It Yes. will improvements be necessary to allow connection? OYes ~]No 18. Is the site located in an agricultura[ district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets La','.', Article 25-AA. Section ,303 and 304? OYes [ONe tin,hewn 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL. and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~]Yes E~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wast'tm?, OYes ]~]No B. Project Description 1: PhYsical dimensions and scale of proiect (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a..Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project spo6sor '53.3.8'7 acres. b. Project. acreage to be developed: 2'7.031 acres initially; 53.3.8'7 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to fern'S, in undeveloped ~oprox 48acres. d. Length of project, in miles: .138 . (If SDpropriate) e. fi. the project is an expansion, indicate per(;~'nt of e~pansion proposed 1,4% %; f. Number of off-street parking }paces existim: approx 30: proposed 99' 'sgall~ plUS 38 over~lo~ g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 5N .(upon complution of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of hr)using units: One Family Two Family M,Htiple I'amily Condominium Imtially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 30' height: T~' width: ~ length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare prelect will o~cupy' 3 9 b \,Viii ~opsod be stockpiled for reclamat~on~ ~Yes CNa c Wdl upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation/ ~Yes L,mNo eyes ~No ~ If smile phase ~rolect Ant~opated period of construction ~2 months (~ndudin~ demolition) (number) month 7 If multi-phased a Total number of phases anticipated __ b AnUopated date of commencement phase 1 c Approximate completion date of final phase __ d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [lYes ~NO 8 YVill blastin§ occur during construction? OYes )~No 9 Number of jobs generated: during construction 15 10 Number of lobs eliminated by this project 0 11 Will proiect require relocation of any prolects or facilitiesZ ton~/cubic cards '/ear (including demolition) year after prolect ~s comole,~e 3 OYes ){~] N o If yes, explain 12 Is surfacb liquid waste disposal involved? OYes ~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent wdl be discharged 13 Is .subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [~Yes ~]No Type 14. Will sur[ace area of an existing water body mcrease or decrease by proposal? Explain Septic and le~chinq rinc ~Yes ]~No 15. Is project or any portion of proiect located in a 100 year flood plain? [~Yes '~JNo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? E~¢es ONo paper and other recyclables a. If yes, what is the amount per month 2 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ~]Yes ElNa Town Sanitary Landfill c. If yes, give name · [ocatibn d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or.into a sanitary landfill? OYes ~No e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal ol~ solid waste? OYes ~]No a. If yes. What is the anticipated rate of disposal? _ tons/mo,,th. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site lite? 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides?" [~Yes 19. Will project routinely prdduCe odors (more than one hour pl'.r day)? ["~Yes [~No 20. %~ill pr0iect produce operating n'oise exceeding the local ambient noise h;vuls? ~/'e¢ 21. Will project result in an increJ~e in er,orgy u~e? I~Yes I[ yes, indicate type(s) (insignificant increase in power an8 gas) [~[No 22. If water supply is from w,:lls, h~dicatc t~ump,,Ig cap,~city 12 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 680 gallo,,~/day. 24. Does prolect involve Local. Slate or Federal Wading:? ~Yes If Yes, explain g,dlons/m,,,uie. ~No .{ City. To~¥n. village go.~rd City. Town. village Plann,ng Board City. Town Zoning Board City. County Health Department Other Local Agenoe~ Other Regional Agenoes State Agencies Federal Agenoes )~Ycs x~Yes ~No ~Yes X~Yes ~,NO ~)Ye s ~,No )~2Yes ~No ~]Yes ~NO ~l~ Yes [~No C. Zoning and Planning Information Site Plan; Bldq Permit Site Plan Health Permit Architectural Review fall/2000 fall/2000 __fall/2000 fall/2000 Town Trustees, Public Officials 2000 NYSDOT, NYSDEC fall/2000 ~BlLreau ATF fall/2001 I Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? )~lYes If Yes. indicate decision required: [Dzoning amendment [~zoning var,ance (~speciai use perm,t I-]new/revision of master plan [~]resource management plan 2. What is the zoning classihcation(s)of the site? B and R-80 ~No [~subdivision [~ot. her {~site plan 3 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zomng? 9 commercial uses plus vineyard 4 What is the proposed zon,ng of the site? B and R-80 (no change) 5 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? C 6. Is the proposed action cons,stent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? []~Yes 7 What are the predominant, land use(s) and zonipg ¢lassific~tioos within radius of...oropo~qd a~(~ion?, "B" - General Buslness;"LB" - Lzmlted ~uszness; a,,~_~e_ LOW Dellsl~y ~esld. ........ z d~g~nt ~ a 1: .~-_ - .................. 8 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 'A mile? ~Yes ~No 9 If the proposed acuon ,s the subdivision of land. how many lots are proposed? N.A. a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s} for the formation of'~Jewer or water districts? [~Yes [~Nc 11. Wilt the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police. f re protect on)? XaYes ~]No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle proie;cted demand? [~Yes UlNo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significandy above present levels? [~Yes ~No a. If yes. is the existing road network adequate to hamlle the additional traffic? U]Yes U]No D. Informational Details Attach 1~ny additional information as may b{: neede( to clarify your project. If tl~ere are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposa , please dis( uss such .mp.a(:ls and the measures which yet; propose to miugate or avoid ti{em. C E. Verification Applical~ ;Sp(,~w.N me Robert Bund - RLA Architects ~ August 4, 2000 ...... .ate wilh Ibis assessment. ' '~en~ral Information (Read Care,,~ · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the quesNon Have my ~c%ponses and determinations be~ Iden~i~ymg ~ha~ an m~pac~ will be potentially la~e (column 2) do~'s not mean d~a~ ~ ~s also necessa~N~ signHican~ Any large impact mus~ be evaluated in PARr 3 (o de(ermine signd~cance Identdv~ng an :mDac( *n column 2 s~mp[ asks that it be looked at further magmtude t.hat would trigger a response tn column 2 The examples are generall~ aDphcable ~hroughou( the State a~ for mos( situations gut, for an~ specific pro~ect or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriJ'( for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation m Part ~ · In identifying impacts, consider Ion8 ~erm, short term and cumladve effects Inslruclions (Read carefully) a Answer each of the 19 quesNons m PART 2 Answer Yes if there will be any ~moac[ c. If answering Yes to a question {hen check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to indicate the potential size of th impact. If impact threshold equals orexceeds any example provided, check column 2 h ~mpac[willoccur bu{threshoh is lower than example, check column ] d I[ reviewer has doubt about size of the impact [hen consider [he impact as po(enuallv large and proceed ~o PART e I[ a po(en[ially large impact checked in column 2 can be mmga(ed by change(s) in (he prolec[ to a small to moderat, mus{ be explained in Part ~ 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impacl Project Change ~ 0 OYes ONo ~1 ~ ~Yes ~No ~ O ~Yes ONo ~ 0 OYes UNo IMPACT ON LAND WHt the proposed action result in a physical change to the prelect site? CJN© ~YES [,amples that would apply to column 2 · Any Construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the proiect area exceed 10%. ' Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will c~ntinue for more than I year or'involw: more than one phase or stage. * Excavation for mining purposes that woulH rern~)ve more than I.O00 tons Of natural material (ie.. rock or soil) Der year. · Conslruction or expansion of a samtary I,mdfill · Conslruc~i~n in a designated floodway · Other impacts the site? (ie. cliffs, dunes, geological format.o.ls, etc )I~]NO L3Y[S · Specific land forms: --. 6 IMPACT ATER 3 Will proposed action affect any water body des*gnated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 2-I. 25 of the Environmental Conservahon Law. ECL) _ ~aNO OYES Examples that ,vould apply to coluran 2 · Developable area of s,te contains a protected water body · ©redgmg more than 100 cubic yards of matenal [rom channel of a · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body · Construction m a designated freshwater or tidal wet[and 4 Will proposed action affect any nomprotected existing or new body of water? ~NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the'surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area · Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ~'~NO ~YES Exampies that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit · Proposed ACtiOn requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contammaUon of a water supply system · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater · Liquid effluent will be convey= J off the site to facilities which presendy do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · P(oposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge'into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the stora~4e of petroleum or chemical products greater than '1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action wi{I allow residential uses in ;treas without water and/of sewer services facdities. C proposed action ,dter drainage or palterns, or ~urface 6, Will flow water runoff? ;(aND OYES $~amples that v.'ould apply to column 2 * Proposed Action would change flood water flows ~ 7 to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Proiect Change ~ ~ F~Yes [~NO ~ ~ OYes ~tqo [] ~ ~'2 Yes ~ ~ ~Ye~ ~o ~ ~ ~Ye~ ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~o ~ ~ ~Y~ ~o ~ ~ ~Ye~ ~ ~ ~Y.~ ~ ~ ~Ye~ ~ ~ ~Ye~ ~ ~ ~Ye~ ~No ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No ~ ~ ~Ye~ ~ ~ ~Ye~ ~No ~ ~ ~Y~'~ ~No · Proposed Ac~on will allow development m a designated floodway IMPACT ON AIR 7 Will proposed action affect a~r quality? ~,,NO ~YES [zamples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or rnore vehicle tr~ps ,n any gwen hour · Proposed Action will result in the inoneratlon of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour · [m~ss~on rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 tbs per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour · Proposed action wiil allow an increase m the amount of land comm,Hed to industrial use. · Proposed act[on will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within ex~sting industrial areas · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8 ~,Vill Proposed Action affect any threatened or end~:ngered species? C~N~O ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or I:ederai list, using the s~te. over or near site or found on the s,te · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts:__ Will Proposed Action substanti-~lly affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ]~]NO C]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any residunt or migratory fish. shellfish or wildlife species Proposed Action requires the removal of rupee Ih,m 1() acres of mature forest (over 100 yeats of age) or other locally *mHortant IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Proposc'd Action affect agricuhura[ 14nd resources~ I 1NO [~nmples Ihat would al)PlY to column 2 land [includes crophlnd, hayfields, paslure, vim!yard, orchard crc) 8 1 impact 2 Polential Can ImpacI [~e Large Mitigated By ImpaCt Project Change ~JYes ~Yes []No ~'~ Y e s ~No ~JYes ~qo ~Yes LZNo ©y& []~o ~Yes ~No ~No EYes []Yes ~No ~Yes E]Yes ~No E]Yes ~]No E~Yes ~]No [~] Yes [~]No C agricultural land of a§riculturai !and or if located in an Agricultural E)istrict. more than 2 5 acres oi agricultural land land mana§ement systems (e g, subsurface dram lines, outlet ditches. IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ]xC]NO E3YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 61721. Appendix B) Examples [hat would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or m sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enloyment o[ the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Proiect components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure o[ historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ]x~NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located widdn the proiect site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensilive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory · Other impacts: Ex,~mplc's that would apply to (olumn 2 ~CINO I~.,y.ES Moderate Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] 2 3 Polenliai Can Impact 8e Large Mitigated By Impact Project Change I~ [~-3 Yes ~No ~ ~Yes []No ~ '~Yes []No LJ iZJ ¥'es E~No ~ E3Yes ~No ~ ~Yes ~ ~Y~s ~No ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~Ye~ ~No 9 IMPACT 0 NSPORTATION ~0 E,amples thai would apply to column 2 · Proposed ACt,On wilt result ,n malor traffic problems IMPACT ON ENERGY Will oroposed action affect the commumty's sources of fuel or energy Supply? ~(~. ,%' O i~. Y E S £xamples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a §rearer than 5% increase m the use of any iorm of enersY in the municipality · Proposed Action witl require the creauon or extens,on o~ an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 singie or two famdv residences or to serve a major commercial or industria~ use · Other ~mpacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16 Will there be objectionable odors, no,se, or vibrat,on as a result of the Proposed Action? ~,%'O -FE'~'YES Examples that ;voul,d apply to column 2 · BlasUng within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensluve fa~ility · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per dayJ · Proposed Action will produce operatm8 noise exceeding the local ambient no~se levels for no~se outside of structures · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a no~se screen. · Other ~mpacts' IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? :~E]NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc')in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e toxic, poisonous, hit4hly reactive, radioactive, ~rritalinl',, infecti6us, etC.) gas or other flammable liquids 1 ~all lo ~derate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact B Mitigated By Project Chang ~Yes ~Yes b'~] Yes ~Yes ~Yes ~Yes OYes ~Yes OYes .0 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] []ON( ~N~ ~N~ OYes []Yes ~N~ OYes E]Yes 18 IMPACT ON GROW*, CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Will propospd action affect tile character of (l~e ex,sun§ commumty? ~NO EYES Examples thai would apply to cotumn 2 · Tile pem~anent population of Ihe Dry. town or wilaae m which prelect is located is likely to grOW by more than 5% · The mumopaJ budget for capital expenditures or operating serwces will increase by more than 5% per year as a (esuit of this prelect · Proposed acUon will conflict with officially adoo(ed plans or goals · Proposed achon wilt cause a change in the density of land use Proposed Acbon wdl replace or eliminate ex~s(mg [acilitie~ structures or areas of historic importance to the community · Development will create a demand for additional commumty services (e g schools, police and fire. etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future prelects · Proposed ACUOn will create or eliminate employment ° Other impacts: o Moderate Impact 2 3 Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigated By Impac; Project Change ~,' ©Yes ©No ~ ~JVes L~No ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~Yes ~JNo ~ ~Yes ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~Yes ~No 19 Is there, or is there likely to be. public controversy related to potential adverse environmental mpactsZ ~NO ~-YE$ If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 C Part 3~EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must ~e prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered lo be pot~dt;-alJy large, even ii the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1, Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by prolect change(s) 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude tl~at this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probahility of the impact occumng · The duraticm of the impact · Its irreversibility, includim: permanently lost n'~ourct.~ of valut~ · Whether lh(t impact Cart or will he conlrolled 11 C Appendix B te Environmental Qualit', ,]iew Visua! EA? Addendum This form may be used to provide adddional informaiion relating to ©uesuon i I of Part 2_ of the Ful! E.AF (To be cornp!eted by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility I Would the project be visible from ·A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public [or the use. enjoymenl and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or m3n-made scenic qualities? A s~te or structure listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places? · State Parks? · ¥i~e State Forest Preserve? I~.ational Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? P!ational fltatural Landmarks and other outstanding natural features? National Park Service lands? Rivers designated as I"tational or State \Vild. Scenic or Recreational? · Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? · A governmentally established or designated interstate or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or 'designation? · A site. area, lake. reservoir or highway designated as scenic? · Municipal park, or designated open space? · County road-? · State? Local road]) P~oject and Resource (in ~iles) 0 % Y~ V.* ~/2-3 3- 5 5 + [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 2. Is the visibility of the project ncason;,l? tie. :;creencd by summer foliage. I?t vi:;ible du~ing other seasons) El?lo Are any of the reso,:~ces the:eked ,,, qu(::.liOn I used Uy the i>ul)lic during the till~c o1' y,,ar during which Ibc proi,:cl will be visible~ ~Yes ~o EssenUaliy undeveloped Forested Agr~cui!ural Subulban residential Industrial (Jrban River, Lake, Pond Clifis, Overlooks Designated Open Space Flal Hilly Other fIOTE: add attachments as needea Are there visually similar prolecls w,thin: · % rqile ~Yes ~ '1 miles ~Yes ~I'to '2 redes ~JYes ' 3 rniies ~ Yes ~-] r'~ ' Dislance ~rom projecl s~te are prowdad rot assmtance. Subsdtuteo~heJ dislancesas approprialel EXPOSkJRE 6 The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed projeet is ROTE: When user data is unavailable o; unknown, use best estimate £OIdTEXT ?. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREC~UENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work [] [] [] Involved in recreational activities [] [] [] [] Routine travel by residents [] [] [] At a residence [~ [] ~] [] 2 / / / PECONIC BAY WINERY ? CUTCHOGUE, NY EXISTING CONDITIONS EXISTING BUILDINGS: I WINE PRODUCTION BUILDING STORAGE FARM STAND FARM HOUSE TASTING BARN EXISTING VINE TYPE & QUANTITY: A MERLOT ~ ,6 ACRES ~ 100 CASES PER YE. AR ]~ CHARDONNAY ~ 1.5 ACRES {~ 300 CASES PER YEAR C RIESLING ~ 7 ACRES ~ 1200 CASES PER YEAR D CABERNET H CABERNET FRANC P CHARDONNAY PAGE 1 PECONIC BAY WINERY CUTCHOGUE, NY FRONT & REAR YARD LOCATION ! EXISTING WINE PRODUCTION BUILDING [I EXISTING STORAGE ]]] EXISTING FARM STAND EXISTING FARM HOUSE ¥ EXISTING TASTING NEW TASTING BARN PAGE 2 0 15 30 120 PECONIC BAY WINERY CUTCHOGUE, NY FRONT & REAR YARD LOCATION PAGE 3 RLA PECONIC BAY' WINERY CUTCHOGUE, NY EXISTING CONDITIONS EXISTING BUILDINGS: I WINE PRODUCTION BUILDING !ri'STORAGE ]]] FARM STAND IV FARM HOUSE V TASTING BARN EXISTING VINE TYPE & QUANTITY: A MERLOT - .6 ACRES ~ 100 CASES PER YEAR B CHARDONNAY - 1.5 ACRES ~ 300 CASES PER YEAR C RIESLING ~ 7 ACRES {~ 1200 CASES PER YEAR D CABERNET E CABERNET FRANC F CHARDONNAY PAGE 4 PECONIC BAY WINERY CUTCHOGUE, NY AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH EXISTING SITE PAGE 5 RLA PECONIC BAY WINERY CUTCHOGUE, NY PROPOSED BUILDNG LOCATioN EXISTING BUILDINGS: PRODUCTION BUILDING STORAGE FARM HOUSE FARM STAND PROPOSED BUILDING: ¥ TASTING BARN & RETAIL EXISTING VINE TYPE & QUANTITY: MERLOT · .6 ACRES ~ 100 CASES PER Y~5~R .32 ACRES REMOVED = 50 CASES PER YEAR CHARDONNAY ± 1.5 ACRES ~ 300 CASES PER YEAR .27 ACRES REMOVED = 55 CASES PER YEAR RIESLING (OLDEST OF THEIR KINO ON L.I.) (NOT AF~ By PROPOS~mD BUILDING) ]) CABERNET E CABERNET FRANC F CHARDONNAY TOTAL ACRES OF VINES REMOVED: · 59 ACRES = 105 CASES PER YEAR PAGE 6 RLA PECONIC BAY WINERY CUTCHOGUE, NY AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH PROPOSED TASTING BARN PAGE 7 PECONIC BAY WINERY CUTCHOGUE, NY DRIVE SEQUENCE PHOTOGRAPH - 1 VIEW OF PROPOSED TASTING BARN LOO~NG EAST FROM SEAFOOD MARKET PAGE 8 VIEW OF EXISTING TASTING BARN LOOKING EAST FROM SEAFOOD MARKET PECONIC BAY WINERY CUTCHOGUE, NY DRIVE SEQUENCE PHOTOGRAPH - 2 VIEW OF PROPOSED TASTING BARN LOOKING EAST PAGE 9 VIEW OF EXISTING TASTING BARN LOOKING EAST PECONIC BAY WINERY CUTCHOGUE, NY DRIVE SEQUENCE PHOTOGRAPH ~ 3 VIEW OF PROPOSED 'FASTING BARN LOOKING SOUTH FROM KING KULLEN PARKING LOT PAGE 10 VIEW OF EXISTING TASTING BARN LOOKING SOUTH FROM KING KULLEN I~&RK[NG LOT PECONIC BAY WINERY , CUTCHOGUE, NY F ALTERNATIVE No. I EXISTING BUILDINGS: ! PRODUCTION BUILDING [[ STORAGE ID FARM HOUSE IV FARM STAND PROPOSED BUILDING: ¥ TASTING BARN & RETAIL EXISTING VINE TYPE & QUANTITY: A MERLOT :~ .6 ACRE8 Q 100 CASES PER YEAR .12 ACRES REMOVED = 20 CASES PER YEAR CHARDONNAY ~'m~m'=~m~,~v~ ~ 1.S ACRES O 300 CASES PER YEAR 1.03 ACRES REMOVED = 205 CA'E8 PER YF-AR RIESLING ~u~r~o.~) ~ 7 ACRE~ Q 1200 CASES PER YEAR .10 ACRES REMOVED = 1~ CASES PER YEAR DCABERNET CABERNET FRANC FCHARDONNAY TOTAL ACRES OF VINES REMOVED: ACREs = 243 CASES PER YF~d~ PAGE 11 RLA PECONIC BAY WINERY CUTCHOGUE, NY ALTERNATIVE No. 2 EXISTING BUILDINGS: ! PRODUCTION BUILDING STORAGE FARM HOUSE FARM STAND PROPOSED BUILDING: ¥ TASTING BARN & RETAIL EXISTING ViNE TYPE & QUANTITY: A MERLOT + .6 ACRES @ 100 CASES PER YEAR 22 ACRES REMOVED = 37 CASES PER YEAR B CHARDONNAY ~ 1.5 ACREs Q 300 CASES PER YEAR ,25 ACRES REMovED = 50 CASES PER YEAR RIESLiNG } 7 ACRES Q 1200 CASES PER YEAR ,64 ACREs REMOVED = 109 CASES PER YEAR D CABERNET E CABERNET FRANC F CHARDONNAY TOTAL ACRES oF VINES REMOVED: 1~11 ACRES = t 96 CA~ES PER YEAR PAGE 12 RLA I FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20' G3'-3" 23'-2 1/2" ~ 2G'-O" ~ PECONIC BAY WINERY CUTCHOGUE, NY OCCUPANCY DIAGRAM -- RETAIL STRUCTURE STORAGE STRUCTURE OFFICE STRUCTURE PAGE 13 SECOND FLOOR PLAN (;3'-I 0 1/2" SCALE: 1" = 20' ~'~'~"'"*~"~ PECONIC BAY WINERY CUTCHOGUE, NY OCCUPANCY DIAGRAM ELEVATION TOP OF RIDGE MEAI'I HEIGHT , OF ROOF AS PER 100 13 STORAGE RETAIL STORAGE NORTH ELEVATION PAGE 14 RLA ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 TO: OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD $outhold Town Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Elizabeth A. Neville DATED: October 10, 2000 RE: Zoning Appeal No. 4882 Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeals No. 4882 - Lavcor Agricultural Inc - Zoning Board of Appeals application for variance. Also included is clarification of interpretation of the bulk, area and parking requirements and front yard setbacks, lot surveys, building department notice of disapproval, building permit application, property card, site plan, ZBA questionnaire, applicant transactional disclosure form, environmental assessment form, and site plans. Peconic Bay Winery. - New Tasting Barn 31320 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11936 Town of Southold Notice of Disapproval: September 20~ 2000 September 27, 2000 SCTM# 1000 - 103 - 01 - 19.11 and 19.2 (Combined 7/2000) Variance Application Zoning Board of Appeals Southold, NY Interpretation of Article X, § 100-102. Bulk, area and parking requirements and Article X, §100-I03. Front yard setback* and/or Variance to Article X, § 100-102. Bulk, area and parking requirements and Article X, §100-103. Front vardsetbacks Before we proceed with our five (5) reasons for an Area Variance, as requested by the Zoning Board of Appeals, we would like to clarify the interpretation of the Article X § 100-102 - Bulk, area and parking requirements, and Article X § 100-103 - Front yard setback*. Interpretation Article X, §100-102. Bulk, area andparking requirements and Article X, §100-103. Front yard setback* As we understand the issue, the new Tasting Barn is in violation of a zoning ordinance that limits the street frontage width of a new building in a "B" zone to sixty (60) feet. The bulk and area requirements, as written in our Zoning Code for the Town of Southold read: §100-102. Bulk, area and parking requirements. No building or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the "B' District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein in fulls 5 Editor's Note: The Bulk Schedule is included at the end of this chapter, and the Parking and Loading Schedules are in §§ 100-191 and 100-192. Bulk Schedule AA [added 11-28-1995 by L.L. 23-1995; amended 7-22-1997 by L.L. 22-1997] and published on 8-10-97 lists three time frames for "Date of Lot Creation". (1) - Prior to April 9, 1957; (2) - between April 9, 1957 and December I, 1971; and finally (3) - between December 2, 1971 and June 30, 1983. In July 2000, the Owner merged Lots #1000-103-01-19.11 and #1000-103-01-19.2, thereby creating a new lot of 27.032 acres (which has yet to be issued a new tax map number, but which actually exists as a newly created lot.) As the time-frame falls outside of the dates listed in the Bulk Schedule, it is our interpretation that Bulk Schedule AA does not apply to this Project. Rather, §100-103 dictates the siting for the Proposed Tasting Barn, as noted in the Notice of Disapproval, dated September 20, 2000. This section, as written in our Zoning Code for the Town of Southold reads: §100~103. Front Yard Setbacks [Added 8-22-1995 by L.L. No. 18-19951 Structures shall be set back at least one hundred (100) feet from the right-of-way. There shall be an exception to Subsection A if the adjacent parcels are developed, in which case the minimum front yard setback shall be the average of the setbacks of the adjacent parcels. The project shall be divided into separate structures so that no single structure shall have more than sixty (60) linear feet of frontage on one (1) street. The setbacks of multiple structures on a parcel may vary, provided that the average setback of the structures meets the setback required above and all buildings are at least seventy-five (75) feet from the right-of-way. Our original interpretation of the principal structure on the property had always been the existing farmhouse (building # IV, page 1 of the enclosed drawing booklet). However, in a meeting with Building Department Officials, on August 30, 2000, we were informed that the Building Department considered the Winery (building # I shown in Figure 1.) to be the principal structure. Page 2 and page 3 in the accompanying drawing package shows a line drawn parallel to the rear property line (the property line with the 25' right-of-way note near it). The line is tangent to the southern point of the roof covering the crush pad on the south side of the Existing Winery building. Similarly, a line drawn parallel to State Route 25, tangent with the northwest point of the Existing Winery defines the front yard. The Zoning Code for the Town of Southold, Article X §100-13. Definitions [Amended 7-31-73] defines its various yards as: Yard, Front - An unoccupied ground area open to the sky between street line, or between the street line established by the Official Map of the Town or an approved subdivision plat, and a line drawn parallel thereto. Yard, Rear - An unoccupied ground area fully open to the sky between the rear lot line and a line drawn parallel thereto. Yard, Side - An unoccupied ground area fully open to the sky between any property line other than a street or rear lot line and a line drawn parallel thereto between the front and rear yards. The front yard, then is the area between the street property line and the northernmost point of the Existing Production Facility (Winery). The New Tasting Barn is clearly not within the front yard of the property. The sideyard is defined as limited in length by the front and rear yards (the shaded areas on the sides of the Existing Winery on Pages 2 and enlarged on Page 3). It does not extend beyond those yards, nor is it duplicated in those yard areas. The proposed New Tasting Barn is an accessory structure and is in the rear yard of the property. The quoted section in the Notice of Disapproval, {}100-103. Front Yard Setbacks, in our interpretation, refers to principal structures located in a front yard and therefore does not subject the New Tasting Barn to the restrictions of the quoted section. Additionally, our proposed structure is well in excess of 100 feet from the street property line (217.80' to be exact) and 25.02' south of the line defining the mar yard. REASON FOR APPEAL Variance to Article X, §100-103. Front yard setbacks Area Variance Reasons: 1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, if granted, becam'e: The proposed New Tasting Barn will actually enhance the character of the neighborhood for several reasons. The Owner wishes to create a strong North Fork presence for the Winery. This aesthetic will greatly offset the (overpowering) commercial forms and structures directly across Route 25 from the site. The present tasting barn is disengaged, in form, in color, and in siting, from the existing cluster of farmhouse and outbuildings. It stands isolated in it's parking lot, a small gambrel roofed structure directly across Route 25 from King Kullen (see Pages 4 and 5). The overall concept for the Project is to create a new, inter-related group of farm-like buildings, which will project a strong rural North Fork identity, with the addition of the New Tasting Barn and with the re-working of the entrance and interior drives. We hope to accomplish this by using the mature trees and landscaping around the existing farmhouse and the strong forms of the existing outbuildings to create the desired motif and new entry for the Winery. The proposed Tasting Barn will be located much closer to the existing farm buildings and will echo their forms (while sited to give the existing buildings roadside prominence). The new structure is accessed by drives that meander through the outbuildings, vines and landscape (see Pages 6 and 7). The character of the neighborhood will not be adversely affected because the building is set back over 200 feet from the road and is screened by trees immediately in front of it. An additional three layers of trees and screen planting in the parking lot and along Route 25 will further obscure the building from the highway. The proposed relocation of the entry drive, from directly opposite the King Kullen entry to 180 feet east along Route 25, will ease the present intersection conflicts. Visually, the new entry drive will not lead into a huge parking lot directly offthe road. Rather, the parking lot is screened from the road and access occurs through the farmyard. The intention is to create an overall impression of a working farm, located along Cutchogue's main road, which you catch no more than a glimpse of as you drive along a Route 25 (see Pages 8, 9, and 10 for drive sequence). 2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some raethod feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: The proposed New Tasting Barn must serve several functions. First, it must create an identity for the Owner. Secondly, it must serve as a retail facility for the winery's product. And finally, it must add desperately needed storage and shipping space. Breaking these functions into separate buildings would be counter-productive. Storage areas must feed the retail space and shipping areas. Office space adjacent to both storage and retail areas enhances efficiency of the operations. Finally, separate buildings would inevitably require more ground coverage and circulation area. One can place the new Tasting Barn in other locations on the site to mitigate the amount of the variance requested (dimension of frontage). But the re-locations cause other problems that detract from the overall character of the neighborhood. Page 11 shows the new Tasting Barn rotated 90 degrees to present a minimal frontage on the roadside. However, doing so creates a site with the Tasting Barn disengaged from the rest of the farm buildings, thereby defeating the farm motif. The vines in field "B" are prime Chardonnay, which just won the New York State "Best of the State" Award for 2000. Placing the barn in such a location would eliminate 68% of the vineyards best grape product. Although the building better satisfies Article X, §100-103. Front lard setbacks, the overall result is less satisfactory than the proposed solution. Page 12 shows moving the Tasting Barn into the R-80 zone (with 30 feet in the "B" zone, as per Article X, §100-22.D. Again, the building disengages from the farm buildings. Field "C", the field with the Riesling vines, supplies grapes for one of the Winery's most popular wines. The produce from this field is slated to figure prominently in new upcoming production methods and has won numerous national and international awards. Placing the proposed Tasting Barn in this position eliminates lose 10% of the Riesling produce capacity. These 20+ year old vines are among the oldest on Long Island. Transplantation is not practical, as the vines will not survive. The proposed structure, as located on Page 6, has been sited to minimize the loss of the 20+ year old vines. 3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: The overall length of the building, as submitted for the building permit, is 202'-9 ¼". If it is determined that accessory buildings located in rear yards are governed by Article X, § 100-103. Front yard setbacks, the front elevation of the building should be considered as an assemblage of components, separated by mass, materials and setbacks. The front elevation of the building consists of three separate occupancies, all of which are separated by firewalls of 2-hour construction (see Page 13). The building module closest to the road is the Retail section, which measures 63'-3" on the ground level and 63'-10 ½" on the second floor. This exceeds the 60-foot module by less than 4 percent. The dimension shown on the submitted plan is roughly equivalent, but approximately 3 feet less, than the dimension of the existing Principal building (Winery). As shown on the Page 13 floor plans, this section stands in front of the long storage portion of the building. It is visually separated from the Storage portion by its projection toward the street, its distinct fenestration rhythm, its roofline, its monitors, its gable and its height (see Page 14). Additionally, the front of the structure is over 200 feet from the street. Article X, §100-103. Front vardsetbacks does not specify a distance separation between structures. The New York State Building Code Part 771 requires vertical and horizontal fire separations between different occupancies. Construction of such separations must allow for the potential collapse (after a fire) of one side of the structure without affecting the other side. So, the differing occupancies are really different structures. In addition, the aesthetic modulation of the height, material treatment and forms of the stepped-back elements as seen on Page 14 visually reinforce the separation. The primary fagade, the Retail module, in essence "blocks" the Storage portion of the New Tasting Barn thereby removing it as a "frontage" element from its position on the site. 4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: Again, we feel that the project will have a very positive impact on the neighborhood for all of the reasons mentioned under paragraph 1). The driveway entrance will be moved away from the primary King Kullen entrance. The composition of the property will help offset the forms of the commercial property on the other side of Route 25. The two alternates explored on Pages 11 and 12 unfortunately do NOT enhance the physical conditions of the property because of the lack of coherence among the buildings. And, Alternate #2 shown on Page 12 sticks out into the R-80 zone. This solution forms an unfortunate focus point for all of the surrounding residential properties on Harbor Lane and Stillwater Avenue (see Page 12 and existing conditions aerial view on Page 5) Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? (X)Yes, or ( )No. The difficulty has been self-created by an honestly different interpretation of the Zoning Code. At the same time, we strongly feel that this is the best solution for the Owner, for the site, for the neighborhood and for the Town. RECEIVED NOV i Town CAerk Southold Town Planninq Board Notice to Adjacent Property Owners You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of theTown of Southold fo~ a site plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM~1000-120-2-2 & 3.1; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the A~C (Agricultural Conservation) Zoning District(s). That the application is to convert an existing 1,505 sq. ft. barn to a tasting room & the construction of a 17,652 sq. ft. winery in Phase I; and a 10,200 sq. ft. winery extension in Phase I1. The property is located on Sound & Bergen Avenues in Mattituck; That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. Or, if you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765- 1938. That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Monday, November 13, 2000 at 6:05 p.m. in the Meetinq Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times, published in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owner's Name(s): Robert Entenmann/Martha Clara Vineyards Date: 10/24/00 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR Z.B.A. APPLICATION A. Please disclose Ye names of the owner(s) and any other individuals (and entities) having a financia~!~ interest in the subject premises and a description of their interests: (Separate sheet may be attached. ) B. Is the subject pr~m~ ses listed on the real estate market for sale or being shown to prospective buyers? { ~ No. (If Yes, please attach copy of "conditions"' of sale.) C. Are there any~ proposals to change or alter land~.contcurs? 1. Are there any areas which con~n wetland grasses? 2. Are the wetland areas shown on the' map s,~hm~ tted with ~h~ s application? /~- 3. Is the property b,,~kheaded between the wetlands a~ea and the UPland buil~-ng area? ~. 4. If your propea%y cone~n~ wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the Office of the Town Trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? E. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of 'proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? ~J;.~, (If not applicable, state "N.A.") F. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences which ~-~t and are not shown on the surve~ map that you are submitting? ~/~/v~'- If none -~st, please state "none." G. Do ~cu have any construction tak}-g place at eh~.~ time concer-~q your pr-~-~es? /~/~ If yes, please submit a coUy of your buil~ng pe~t and map as auproved by the B~il~ng Department. If none, please state. H. Do ~ or any co-owner ~1~o own other land close to parcel? ~-5 If yes, please explain where or submit copies I. Please list present use or operations conducted at ~c~z~proposed use ~ ~,~,/'r-~, ,,v~,v 7",~-r',,,-~,, ,¢~t,~/~, Aueh~rize~ Si~=ure an~ Date . 3/87, 10/901k The Town of Southold's code of Ethics prohibits conflicts interest on the part of town officers and employees° The ~Urpose of this form is to provide information which can aiert the tovn of possible conflicts of interest and allov it to ta~e ~hatever action is necessary to avoid same. NATURE OF APp~CATION~ (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance ~/ Change o£ zone ~pprovmL'of plat (If -other." name the activitY,) parent, or child is (chec~ all that appLy)t A) the ovner of greater than 5% off ~he shares of the ~) the legal or beneficial ovner of any interest in a ~sTOWn Of Southold P.O Box 1179 outhoid, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 10~05~00 Transaction(s): Application Fees Receipt~: 47833 Subtotal $400.00 Check#: 47833 Total Paid: $400.00 Name: Lavcor, Agricultural Inc 31320 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Clerk ID: LYNDAB Internal iD: 18709 PaineWebber L~¢~z~P~~ JG 47833 1285 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS :369 .T~ c~ f~ c;'('l ~ Mil' 17TH FLOOR AGGT. NUMBER NEW YORK, NY 10019-6096 6144 FOUR HUNDRED D O/ O PAY TO THE ORDER OF I TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fleet National Bank I-la~onY, CT .' 3 r= q t, ? P, 3~,,' I:Ol,~qoohh5,; ?~ ?-~ & 5"' R~ ARCHITECTS SCALE: 1/16"= 1 '-0 PE0.00.06.29 WEST ELEVATION PEOONIC BAY WINERY CUTCHOGUE, NY RLA ARCHITECTS SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0" PEC.00.06.29 PLANNING BOARD MEMBE8 BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Board of Appeals Bennett Orlowski, Chairmar~ Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 NOV, aZOOO !!' Appl. No. 4882 - LAV-COR AGRICULTURAL INC. (Peconic Bay Winery) Appl. No. 4864 - Martin Rosen DATE: November 14, 2000 Appl. No. 4882 - L,.~AV - COR AGRICULTURAL INC. The Planning Board is in favor of the requested width variance. The original intent of limiting the building width to 60' was to prevent multiple use buildings such as strip malls in business zoned areas. The purpose of the limitation was to break up the mass of the multiple use buildings. Single occupancy wineries, by their nature, require all operations to be under one roof. Several wineries, located in residential areas near the applicant, exceed the 60' limit. Appl. No. 4864 - Martin Rosen The Planning Board is not in favor of reversing the Building Department's Revocation of Permit. The Code is clear when it states, "that an accessory use cannot exist without a principle use." FOR BOARD AND STAFF USE Updated New Information ROBERT LUND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, LTD. 4829 EAST LAKE HARRIET PARKWAY, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55409 P. O. BOX 1134, WAINSCOTT, NY 11975 TO: FAX NUMBER: DATE: FROM: PROJECT NUMBER: TRANSMITTAL Ms. Linda Kowalski Board of Appeals Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 (631) 765-1809 11-9-00 Robert Lund Peconic Bay Winery Cutchogue, NY 9916 (612)9274)680 FAX (612) 9274)382 (516) 537-55J~--~ ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND: Ms. Kowalski- Enclosed are copies of the Certified Mail receipts, sent on Wednesday, November 11. Originals receipts sent via FEDEX to you today, for delivery on Friday, November 10. To date we have received 7 Return Receipts. Thank you, Robert Lund Cc: Mr. and Mrs. Paul Lowerre Ms. Angela Fowler Mr. Ronald Gray James & Elizabeth Harmon Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Gregory R. & Elizabeth A. Bums 90 Bridle lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 Frank T. Klos Stillwater Avenue Cutchogue, NY 11935 Mary E. Trentalange Stillwater Avenue and Willow Street Cutchogue, NY 1193~' James & Georgeanna Fogarty 32320 Route 25 P.O. Box 61 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Marion R. King 51155 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 42 _~ C[ Ed ~u 75: mm Cu Do~ m l14r~ Cut~ Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (EndorSement Required) Steven Cielatka & Karen Haas str. 895 Stillwater Avenue -b~:Cutchoeue,~_ o NY 11935 Michael & Elizabeth Lademan 1625 Stillwater Avenue Cutchogue, NY 11935 I~o.. -/o~- /-I~,~ Russell W. & Mary Kathryn Baker Vineyard View Drive Cutchogue, NY 11935 N.Y. Telephone Co. cio NYNEX Property Tax Department 31~t Floor 1095 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 1956 / - 35 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Reynold Blum Main Road P.O. Box 709 Cutchogue, NY 11935 I,~ ~ .- i~ -~ -- I - I~/,10 Nathan L. Scrota 70 East Sunrise Highway Valley Stream, NY 11581 Cutchogue, Ny 11935 BU~s vNathan L. Serota 70 East Sunrise Highway alley Stream, NY 11581 f ROBERT LUND ASSOCIATES 41i~gMA~'rLAK~'TpA~KWA¥~ MIN~IN~LIgv MN P,O. BOXIIM, W~NS~, ~ PAX NUMBF~.: DATE: FROM: PROJECT NUMBER: Ms. Linde Kowalski Board of Appeals Town of Southold Souflaold. NY (631) 765-1823 11-9-00 Robe~ Lurid P~conic Bay Winery 9916 ARCHITECTS. LTD. (612) 92?4ri, au Ynx (6la) 927-031a ($16) ${?-,5S00 FAX ($16) 72.~,4471 ( 4 ~ - TOTAL PAGES ~1~ 'I'RAN~MI~ION ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND: Ma. Kowelaki- Enolosed are aoplea of the Certified Mail receipts. 8ertl on Wednesday, November 9. Originals sent via FEDEX to you today, for delivery on Monday, November 13. To date we have received 7 Return Receipt~. Thank you, Robert Lurid Cc: Mr. end Mm. Paul Lowerm Mt. Angela Fowler Mr. Ronald Orly N.Y. Telephon~ Co, · c/o NYI',I.~X . Property Tax Department 31" FlOOr. 1095 Avenue o!' Ibc Americas NY ~0036 Ku~sell W.'& Mary Kathryn Baker Vineym'd View Drive Culc~oguo, NY 119:t5 golly ,i'ean Kaolin 42~ $tlllwater AvoJluo Cutohosve, NY 11935 ) ~ [.T~ S95 Stillwat~r Avenue ~.. ~G'~tchog~o, NY 1193B ............. James & George,nrta Fogarty 32320 Route 25 P.O. Box 61 C'u tcllo~ue, 1,4'y 11935 -~,~ Edward & Sh~on Mecbnowski 755 Stillw~ar Avanua [',5 Cut~ho~¢, NY 11995 iR, ey~old Blum ! Main Road !P.O. Box 7op i Cut~;hogu¢, IN~ 11935 GregorylL & l~lizabeth A. Bums 90 Bridle lane Michael &Eliznbcth Lademan ' 1625 Stillwater Avenue ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD:NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of (Name of Applicants) CTMParceI#1000-/~ - / - /~.z~.~/¢.l/ -X AFFIDAVIT OF MAILINGS COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) ¢/~ .d-,'¢~-~'-~,.--' , New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the ~- ~ day of ~/? v~7~'~'~'~, 2000, I personally mailed at the United States Post Office in 47u T¢'#z:~: c,~- , New York, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a true copy of the attached Legal Notice in prepaid envelopes addressed to current owners shown on the current assessment roll verified from the official records on file with the ()~ Assessors, e~ ~-) Ceunty-Real Pro~.~.., Office T~,.',~ ~? ,~ur-~z-~ , for every properly which abuts and is across a public or private street, or vehicular right-of- way of record, surround'rig the applicant s property. Sworn to .before me this .2o,oo. ~ ~otary P~lblio) L~ .,(~ignature) GAYLE CORWITH °~CKERING NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New York No. 4775195, Suffolk Coun~;y ~, Term Expires ~..to,~. ~; ")oo .... PLEASE list, on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet of paper, the lot numbers next to the owner names and addresses for which notices were mailed. Thank you. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD:NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of (Name of Applicant) AFFIDAVIT OF SIGN P. OSTING Regarding Posting of Sign upon Applicant's Land Identified as lOOO--I - COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) I, ~o~ca .X ~. ()'9~A)," resJdingat ~ ~f' //~r~ , New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: C--r-- On the (~ day of ~ 0 V' ,2000, I personally placed the Town's official Poster, with the date of headng and nature of my application noted thereon, securely upon my property, located ten (10) feet or closer from the street or right-of-way (driveway entrance) - facing the street or facing each street or right-of-way entrance;* and that ~ hereby confirm that the Poster has remaFr)ed in place fo.~ seven-- prior to the date of the subject hearing date, wh~c~ headng datC./wi~f~ ~/O..to be (SignatL~re) /. Sworn to before me this ~+h day of t4~w_.~b~', 2000. ~C ?v,.~ GAYLE Or3FlWl'r~ OlCKERING · NOTARY PUBL,- .-~ of New York ~J(~taryPublic) J No,47'~b195rm~,''', ,ount¥ *near the entrance or driveway entrance of my property, as the area most visible to passersby. TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOERRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. JOSEPH H. SAWICK( JAMES DINIZIO, JR. ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Appl. NO. 3898 Matter of PECONIC BAY VINEYARDS. Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VII, Section 100-71 B (6), for permission to use existing barn for winery production and storage. Property Location: 32180 Main Road, Cutchogue, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 103, Block 01, Lot 19.2. WHEREAS, a publiq hearing was held and concluded on February 1, 1990 in the~matter of the Application of PECONIC BAY VINEYARDS under Appeal N~. 3898; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is located along the south 'side of Main Road, Town of Cutchoque, and is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 100, Section 103, Blook 01, Lot 19.2. 2. This is an application for a Special Exception from the Zoning Code Article VII, Section 100-71 B (6), for permission to use existing barn for winery production and storage.' Sage 2 - Appl. No. 3898 Matter of PECONIC BAY VINEYARDS Decision rendered February 15, 1990 3. Article VII, Section 100-71 B (6), The following uses are permitted as a special exception by the Board of Appeals as hereinafter provided and subject to site plan approval by the Planning Board, provided that not more than one (1) use shall be allowed for each forty thousand (40,000) square feet of lot area: (6) Wineries. 4. The premises in question contains a kotal acreage excess of 2.783 Acres (121,288 sq. ft.), in the Hamlet of Cutchogue, Town of Southold. in 5. The subject premises is located in a Residential Office (RO) Zone District. 6. In considering this application, the Board finds and determines: (a) that the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in adjacent use districts; (b) that the special exception will not in turn cause a substantial effect on the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience and/or or~er of the Town; [c) that in carefu!.ly considering the record and all the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by granting the special exception, as applied conditionally noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Dinizio, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT a Special Exception in the matter of the application of PECONIC BAY VINEYARDS as applied under Appeal No. 3898, for the use of existing accessory structures, excluding the farm stand, for the production and storage of wine. -Accordingly, wine production will primarily take place in largest structure on premises, which is existing large barn. Vote of the Board Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Dinizio, (Absent Joseph Sawicki and Serge Doyen). resolution was duly adopted. Grigonis, and This df GERARD p. GOEHRINGER, So~thold Town Board of Appeals -6- May 23, 1985 Regular Meeting (Appeal No. 3346 - REYN~OLD BLUM, continued:) as submitted (resolution of 4-1-85); 5. It is the opinion of the board that the effect of Article III, Section 100-30(B)[14] limits this Special Exception approval to the production and retail sales of wine "...produced from grapes primarily grown on the vineyard on which such winery is located..." and does not permit the sale of grapes imported and/or processed, or wine, from other than the vineyard in question. In considering this application, the board determines: (1) the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in adjacent use districts; (2) the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience and order of the town will not be adversely affected by the proposed use and its location; (3) the use is in harmony with and will pro- mote the general purposes and intent of zoning. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Sawicki, it was RESOLVED, that a Special Exception for the production and retail sale of wine in the proposed winery structure with addition to be located at the vineyard known as "Peconic Bay Vineyards," BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED as applied under File No. 3346 in the of'~EYN-~-[-D B~ SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOW- ~tter--of~Appolica~ion IN~ CON. IOnS: 1. No sleeping or living quarters in the winery structure or accessory buildings (except that one separate one-family dwelling may be permitted in compliance with all codes); 2. This special exception approval is limited to the production and retail sale of wine produced from grapes primarily grown on the vineyard on which such winery is located; 3. The effect of this special exception shall be in accordance with Article III, Section 100-30(B)[14]. ~ 4. Any changes from the site and sketch plans submitted and approved hereunder will require additional Special Exception application and approval from this board. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Doyen, Douglass and Sawicki. This resolution was adopted by unanimous vote of all the members. So~thold Town Boa~of Appeals -5- May 23, Regular Meeting PENDING DECISION: Appeal No. 3346: Application of REYNOLD BLUM, Peconic Bay Vineyards, 31320 Main Road, Cutchogue, NY for a Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30(B)[14] for approval of the establishment of a winery at Peconic Vineyards premises known as 31320 Main Road, Cut- chogue, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 103, Block 01, part of lot 19.11; more particularly identified as Parcel 1 of 24.249 acres as approved by the Planning Board 6/2/80. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded in the Matter of the Application of REYNOLD BLUM on May 23, 1985; and WHEREAS, the board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the subject premises as well as its surrounding area; and WHEREAS, the board has considered all testimony and documentation entered into.the record in this matter, as well as items (A) through (1) of Article XII, Section 100-121(C)[2] of the Zoning Code; and WHEREAS, the board made the following findings of fact: 1. The property in question is located in an "A-80" Residential and Agricultural Zoning District havi'ng frontage of 357.23 feet along the Main Road and 198.62 feet along the easterly side of Stillwater Avenue and an area of 24.249 acres, more particularly known as Lot #1 of the 6/2/80 Subdivision approved by the Town Planning Board, and County Tax Map District 1000, Section 102, Block O1, Part of Lot 19.11. 2. The subject 24.249 acres is improved with one barn presently set back from the front property line along the Main 165± feet and from the easterly property line 17± feet; structure Road of 3. This is an application for a Special Exception for a winery for the production and retail sale of wine produced from grapes pri- marily grown on the vineyard on which this winery is proposed to be located, provided by Article III, Section 100-30(B)[14] of the Zoning Code on the existing vineyard and farm on this 24.249-acre parcel to be located within the existing barn structure and proposed addition as shown on the sketch plan submitted with the subject application received 3-22-85; (total approximate dimensions for the winery structure shown: 76' wide at the back side, 60' deep at the east side, 46' wide at the front side, and 34' deep at the west side). 4. It is noted for the record that an application for site plan approval has been filed with the Southold Town Planning Board, and although no official action has been taken, the Planning Board has recommended approval of the Special Exception proposal ZO SOUTHOLD, G BOARD OF APPE~S TOWN OF SOUTHOLD (631) 765-1809 FAX (631} 765-9064 53095 MAIN ROAD NY 11971-0959 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: FROM: ZBA OFFICE STAFF 765-1809 FAX NUMBER:/~/Z~/~ -- ~c;~ '~4 ~)~,~'-~ TOTAL NO. OF PA~[.~ INCLUDING COVER.' [] URGENT [] FOR REVIEW [] PLEASE COMMENT[] PLEASE REPLY[] PLEASE RECYCLE NOTES/COMMENTS: (631) 765-1809 OFFICE OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 53095 Hain Road Southold, NY 11971 fax (631) 765-9064 October 31, 2000 Re: Chapter 58 - Public Notice Requirements Dear Applicants: Please find enclosed a copy of the Legal Notice describing your recent application. The Notice will be published in the next issue of the Suffolk Times. Pursuant to Chapter 58 of the Southold Town Code (copy enclosed), formal notice of your application and hearing must be mailed and shall include a map or sketch showing the new location with the setbacks and use noted. Send this Notice CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, within five (5) days of this letter, including a copy of the plot map of this project, to all owners of land (vacant or improved) surrounding yours, including land across any street or right-of-way that borders your property. Use the current addresses shown on the assessment rolls maintained by the Town Assessors' Office (765-1937) or the County Real Property Office in Riverhead. If you know of another address for a neighbor, you may want to send the notice to that address as well. Please submit your Affidavit of Mailing to us after the receipts have been postmarked by the post office. Later, when the green signature cards are returned to you by the Post Office, please mail or deliver them to us. If any signature card is not returned, please advise the Board at the headng. A town poster is available for posting (by 11/7). When picking up the sign, a $15 check will be requested as a deposit. When posting the sign, please place it no more than 10 feet from your front property line bordering the street or main access to your property. (If you border more than one street or roadway, an extra sign is enclosed for the front yard facing each additional street.) The sign(s) must remain in place for at least seven (7) days, and if possible, should remain posted through the day of the headng. If you need a replacement sign, please contact us. After the signs have been in place for seven (7) days, please submit your Affidavit of Postin.q to us for the permanent file. If you do not meet the deadlines stated in this letter, please contact us promptly. It may be necessary to cancel your headng if the required steps are not followed. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, Enclosures ZBA Staff STATE OF NEWYORK) < SectiSn ~ iJ~g"Depanment's *i · ~tio n 100-13: Location of Property:. ~'>Right-of-_Way off the North Side of fM~i~ Road (Stdte Route 25), Orient: Parcel ~.000-19-3-9.8 and 9.9. ~ ~i ~7..~ p.m. AppL No. 4887- VIC- . This is a '~v~quest for a Variance under Article 100-244B, based on October based on the defmltlom of Sec'ti( 100-13; and/or (b) a variance und Article X, Section 100-103C, for new Wine Tasting Barn, in addifi, to the existing w~ery producti, building, which, based on t! Building Department% Septemb ~0, 2000 Notice of Disapprocal, proposed for an overall leng Disapprowl for an exceeding 60 fi. frontage faring t dweiling.,which will. Main Road (State Route : maximum Cutcbogue; parcel 1000-103-I-1~ ,area. ~Locallbn bf !'and 19.1L 2215 Minnehaha 8:00 p.m. Appl. ,1,1o~ 4862 ,= ~SPRING SPE~ )SS; .. ~ ~ .j.~.: -; . (Owncns: W. Baxter& ~s~) COUN'~( OF gHFFO/~ .~. ~i,lmum r~ment foY a .ppL No~ ~ - - a request for a Vafinn~ ~d · ~ ~% ~ ~ A % ( Pm~ '455: 'B~ Drive a~u~t for ~' A~ B~ and on ~he Bu~nt~ M codn~, ~ duly swor~ says t~m~,-f~~a~::~(~t'u~ by $~ ~ 31; 2~ N~~} clerk of TH~ ~llFFnmg ~u~o }~14~? ~: :~; ~ ~'~;::~ff~&~flicle ,~[I,..~0a~:l~ .~ ~ovm of.~~ puD,shed at Maffituck, in th~::~[E~:~ ~o~E ~.~:"~). r~ms in an :owncr-~epi~ tion tower at a h~i~t CounN of Su~lk sn~ ~f~fa ~f ~ ~n~ vc~ (Ba~e AE~ ::~.Jor I~n~ aed :~ 0f fc~t above ~e averase heist .. . -- . - ......... "~:~).~ b a:~u~t tm ~ ~f t0 Oot ~e *h~. 10 ~a~ b~ld~ ~ ~ f~t of the ~ot~ce of which the annex~ [~~~~t.~,pro~, ~.ity. ~e hc~ ~'pm~ st n( ~n r~ularlv oubl shed in ~~~~~ ~f s~ ~,bd~y~ ~t kom ~o~d. · ~tina - -- - . ' - ~ "' ~'~'~eB~~and ~rdinatc to ~e Pro~y: 4~5 Elljah~ La~ each week ~r [ ~$~'~C~oti~ ?Of~'~p~::use of the-dwellas ~ Matttuck ~unty T~:Map ~ commencmo on fha ~',~a~.'~f~ a~tl~ to~:~oa ef Pco~y: 8755 ~F~h 1~1~-113. ~ne Dmn X ] ~~~:~:$~ ~31 ~ ~h~ule and ~e ~-:~ard~ n h~ ~o~ ~ ~ .... ~ P~ic,~;Pa~ll~9&34.~+~ ~II; ~ion l~lB, b~on ex.ts at 117~ ~d Avem ~orn to o~tR~ this L ~ ~ p.m. :ApPl. No. 48~ - the . Building Depa~ent~ Mauituck, NY; p~r~l No. l~l~ d~ O~ ~ · ~ ~AMEfl AND ~ELEN LECH- ~tem~ .11, 2~ Noti~ -of 3~. ~ne: ~ L~t Industnm.~ ' ' MANfl~. ~ is a r~uest for a D~ppro~l to l~te an eddition to re--ns stnt~ m the D~rov~ CH~I$~T.~E~ Vafian~ under Article ~IV, dwelling and fen~. ~e addition ~ as. follows: "Pursuant to Artb No~pu~,S~ieolNewYo~ Section 1~-244B. based on the pro~d with lot ~verage for all XXVIII, Section l~-~2B, · ~.01~ Building Department's September building area ex~eding tbe maxi- Building Inspector may Fevoke ~gZ~ 7~ 11, 2~ No~g of Di~pproval to mum ~% ~itted by ~e, the buil~ng ~t ~u~ ~ e~or wh ~s~ ~ ~ lg~ I~te ~ addition to dweaing and fen~ ~1 ~ter ~an 6~ f~t ~ it s~uld n0[ ~ ~u~. - · ~' ad,Bun to a~o~ garage ~th a ~t'alo~ the ~e ~d ~:~ ~ ra~ ~e ~UOa ~, ~' t ~ ~r~nt: ~tioa bf ~o~F · v Strut, Orient ~; Pa~l 1~:3- pr~e~g non~mo~g awen~ · ~ ~ ~CE OF PUBLIC ~ ~K~ng ~reet, Orient, NY, ~r~l 3.1. ~ P . HEA~NGS 1~-245. 7:35 p.m. Appl. No. 4879 'Z .ponuant to A~icle ~ SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 16, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and Chapter 100 (Zoning), Code of the Town of Southold, the following applications will be held for public hearings by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall~ 53095 Main Road, Southold Neiv Yoi'k~' 1197L on'' BER 16. 2000 at thd' tlm~s noted below (or as soon thereafter as ble). ~ p.m. Appl. No. 4583 - MAR1 D. SHEA. This is a-request for a Variance under Article XXIV, Section 100-244B, based on the Building Department's September 11, 2000 Notice of Disapproval to locate an addition to dwelling with a front yard setback at less than 35 feet, at 1350 Smith Road, Peconic, PETER HENNESgEY nnd MARY- 100-241~. Subject pr~Per~.does, &NN FONTANA (Buckaneer contain a permitted principal ~ Books). This is a request for a pursuant to ArtleleXIV, Section 1' Variance under Article II!, Section 14lA. An accessory use cannot e: 100-31 Bulk ~cbedule, based on the without a principal use." Building Department's September The Board of Appeals will at 11, 2000 Notice of Disapproval for a above time and place hear all pers~ warehouse, or storage building, or their representatives desiring which building area will bring the be heard or to submit written st~ NY; Parcel 1000-98-3-25.1. total lot coverage over 20% of the lot meats (before the hearing is coacl 7.'00 pm. Appl. No. 4885 - F.B. size. Location of Property: 4460 ed).. ;The .bea. rin~ ,will_ri, ut start aev~ gllFt~.V [11 This is a reouest for a Denot Lane; Cutchogue NY; Parce er man ues~gnateo, eries arC. Section 100-244B ~oased on the ·: ,~..~ pan. AppI. Building Department% September i: :DON AND MADELEINE i, have questions, please do noth 19, 2000 Notice of Disapproval to ~.~t[.Al?~.~R. Thisisarequestfora tate.to call (631) 765-1809. 6:30. p.m. Appl. No. 4884- rear yard setback at less than 50 feet. 100-103C, based on the ',Building - GERARD P. GOEHRINGIcHAiRM RIIII.DING DEPT This is a reauest Location ~of property: Private Road, . .Department's September ~' · ----ret~tioff Fish~r~*i~land, NY: Parcel 1000.7-6- Notice of D sapproval. Applicants sOUTHOLD TO' under Article I, Section 100-13'o! the 10. are proposing an addition to an exist- BOARD OF APp£.a 'Zoning Cede, as to whether or not a " 7:10 p.m. Appl. No. 4889 - ing commercial building with a new Townl standards of Section 100-31C(4)(a). 100:31 Bulk Schedule, based on the Southold, NY; 1000-55-2-23. 1609-1TN2 LAV-COR AGRICULTURAL WINE TASTING BUILDING FRONTAGE/LENGTH INTERPRETATION AND/OR VARIANCE THURS, NOV. 16, 2000 7:45 p.m. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD:NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of (Name of Applicant) AFFIDAVIT OF SIGN P. OSTING Regarding Posting of Sign upon Applicant's Land Identified as 1000- COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) I, X , New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the ~ day of ~ O V' ,2000, I personally placed the Town's Official Poster, with the date of headng and nature of my application noted thereon, securely upon my properly, located ten (10) feet or closer from the street or right-of-way (driveway entrance) - facing the street or facing each street or right-of-way entrance;* and that I hereby confirm that the Poster has rergalTjed in place fo~ seven--da~" prior to the date of the subject heating date, ,w'n~c~ headng dat~4~wi~l~o~)ln~.o be (Signature) / Sworn to before me this ' ~ day of ~v~b-,;', 2000. ~"(l(~~ GAYLE CORWIT~ °'CKERIN(~ · NOTARY PUBLIC · :e of New York tary Public) · near the entrance or driveway entrance of my property, as the area most visible to passersby, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD:NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of (Name of Applicants) CTMParcel#1000- I,~ '~ / - I ¢. z ~-~ lr/. // -X AFFIDAVIT OF MAILINGS COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEVV YORK) 5'/r~ /~/y/z~ , New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the ~- ~/~ day of /~''F~'~'-/¢-, 2000, I personally mailed at the United States Post Office in ~ ~ Td~ ~ ., New York, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RE~RN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a t~e ~py of the a~a~ed L~al Noti~ in prepaid envelopes address~ to cu~ent o~ers sho~ on the ~rrent assessment roll vedfl~ from the o~cial re~rds on file with the ~ Assessors, ~ prope~y ~i~ abuts and is across a public or pdvate street, or vehicular right.f- way of re.rd, su~ounding the applicant's pro.dy. ignature) Sworn to before me this PL~SE list, on ~e ba~ of this A~davit or on a sheet of paper, the lot numbers ne~ to the owner names and addresses for ~ich noti~s were mailed. Thank you. James & Elizabeth Harmon Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Gregory R. & Elizabeth A. Bums 90 Bridle lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 Frank T. Klos Stillwater Avenue Cutchogue, NY 11935 Mary E. Trentalange Stillwater Avenue and Willow Street Cutchogue, NY 1193~' James & Georgeanna Fogarty 32320 Route 25 P.O. Box 61 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Io,o-/o~- I-I~,g' Marion R. King 51155 Main Road Cutchogne, NY 11935 Kelly Jean Kaelin 425 Stillwater Avenue Cutchogue,'NY 11935 Edward & Sharon Machnowski 755 Stillwater Avenue Cutchogue, NY 11935 /~, t o ~'/~ .~ - / ~ i3' Dorothy Jeanette Chamews & Everett B. Glover 1145 Stillwater Avenue Cutchogue, NY 11935 Michael & Elizabeth Lademan 1625 Stillwater Avenue Cutchogue, NY 11935 /~o~' -/a~ - Russell W. & Mary Kathryn Baker Vineyard View Drive Cutchogue, NY 11935 N.Y. Telephone Co. cio NYNEX Property Tax Department 31st Floor 1095 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 Theodore P. Behr 6500 New Suffolk Road P.O. Box 629 New Suffolk, NY 11956 10¢'~ (~ ~' -I~ t/ Steven Cielatka & Karen Haas 895 Stillwater Avenue Cutchogue, NY 11935 Emily Kosclusko Stillwater Avenue Box 281 Cutchogue, NY 11935 /wa: -i,w? ~ t - ( ~ Steven & Deborah Wick P.O. Box 985 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Reynold Blum Main Road P.O. Box 709 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Nathan L. Serota 70 East Sunrise Highway Valley Stream, NY 11581 SCAL~: 1" = 80' WELL DETAIL DRAINAGE CALCU LA]~f~. PROV~OE STORAGE FOR 1OO ~ n[ A ? F~ -~INFAL' SANITARY CALCULATIONS:_ PROPERTY LOCATED IN GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ZONE IV, 600 GPO/AC ALLOWASLE FLOW FOR SITE' 27.03~ :/: AC X 600 GPO/AC = 16,219 GALLONS PER DAY EXISTING FLOWS : OOL CJ~,BP£TE 5UR~S (LF) TiP_ ~ETAININ6 W~.L (LF) I l/¢ NYS~TYPE ~ P WE~glN¢ ¢~5URSE I/2" AS~iIdA-T l~liqP~¢. 5¢¢RSE ~" 5TAt~ILIZED ~ASE TEE .J I]ETAIL HYDRAULIC PROFILE TASTING $ARN SY2TEM LIOLII]} LEVEL~ NTS FINAL LEACH[NO PB_g~L._D ET AIL f S,*,,~=~Y, 48 H~-,¢ IN AJ~VAN2.,E 0= ~INNIN¢ E~,H W~RM. AL~IN¢ A T~/VN UNLE~5 E~Thl~Wl~ N~2FEP ~N ThE P'LAN5 REV. NO. b DATE ITEM KEY PLAN NTS z 0 o>: z ~ D © D 5 Z (D ~,,© © Z W .2 SHT. 1 OF 2 WELL DETAIL x/ NT, S ./ / // :. %.. DRAIH ACE C ALCU L_A~J~ RIRO'v)DE SfORA~E FOR 100 % OF A 2 rNCH RAIHFALL FOR iMPERV)OUS AREAS PRO~IDF 15 ~ S~ORAOE OF A 2 INCH RAiN FOR PERMIABLE SURFACES USE 10 FO0T DIAMETER PRECAST CONCRETE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE~c RATED AT 6842 CFZVF DEPTH 2,O70 CF / 6842 CF/VE - 30 3 VF REQUIRES U$~ (~) 10 FOO~ D;AMETE~ BY H FOOT EFFECTIVE DERrH POOLS, 33 VF TOTAL DEPTH SAflI1 ARY CALCULATIONS: FINAL LEACHING POOLS- USE I0 FOOT OIAMETER PRECAST CONCRETE SANITARY LEACHING POOLS 8727 GPO FLOW / 1,5 G/SF ~ 5~1~ 8F REQUIRED 581 8 SF/ 31,~r SF/VF = 1853 VF 10 FO0~ DIAMETER POOLS REQUIRED USE (2) 10 FOOT DIAMETER DY 10 FOOT BEeP POOLS PRO'rIDING 20 VF EFFECTIVE DEPTH AND AREA RESERVED FOR 50 ~ FuTURE EXPANSION OF LEACHING FACIUTIES ALLC~VDP N~ER ~ ~EG - 6ENE~_ ~NEG ~ - 5~4 $ 1~ DO-hER .A~EA 8,000 lee GALLON SEPTIC TANK DETAIL HYDRAULIC PROFILE TASTING BARN SYSTEM FINAL LLACHI~G POOL DETAIL ,,, \ \ REV, NO, RJ_A REV As PEP-. KEY PLAN N.T.S. SHT. 0 ,', ,,. 160 , 30" MAC, LE TREf 60" MAPLE TREE AELE, .TREE REV. NO. ~o z-< -- EXIST, WASTE WATER 8" APPL ~-SANITARY g NT TR~ 8' RINGS ~-~ PROP . }/ /~ , ......