Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
4862
443>e7t:^e/sP,e.,t37- Sostrisiczr <.s�. ick `S E%,Z e4''s /4, AV 7-> 7 4111 !/c3 I �. sews 2t Ifitiieze-se-ss-Coe/e rnt/adt71oytotNc� _ vb toe,. -sSCe7 87;e tc2u.4t s - 4/63 d 147 rf�3/e. P APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS i,f° gpFFU(r- /1•�pNO COG Southold Town Hall Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman J y�: 53095 Main Road James Dinizio, Jr. y Z P.O. Box 1179 Lydia A. Tortora ; *br/ Southold, New York 11971 Lora S. Collins : 4 e t ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 George Horning _41 *t 14,1� Telephone (631) 765-1809 „,,,, BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF DECEMBER 7, 2000 Appl. No. 4862 —SPRINT SPECTRIUM, L.P. 1000-108-4-11.3 STREET & LOCATION: 415 Elijah's Lane, Mattituck DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: November 16, 2000 FINDINGS OF FACT PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's property is located on the west side of Elijah's Lane, Mattituck. The property contains approximately 95,000 sq. ft. with 197.50 ft. frontage along the west side of Elijah's Lane, Mattituck. The property is improved with a one-story warehouse building and rear yard structures as shown on the Map dated August 13, 199, prepared by Carman-Dunne, P.C. The property is zoned Light-Business (LB). BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Inspector's May 31, 2000 Notice of Disapproval for the reason that applicant's proposed wireless telecommunication tower exceeds the height limited under Section 100- 1626.3 within 300 feet, at a total height of 110 feet (overall). RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant is requesting a height 10 ft. greater than its existing tower and which has an overall height 20 feet greater than other structures within 300 feet. The existing telecommunications tower is 100 ft. tall. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: Based on the testimony and record before the Board and personal inspection, the Board makes the following findings: (1) The proposed monopole tower will replace the existing tower and will add co-location facilities, which is encouraged by the Southold Town Code. Co-location of telecommunication antennas are needed and will enhance efficiency with expanded coverage. Alternate sites for the tower, to obviate the need for a variance, is not available on this property without a variance. (2) No evidence has been submitted to show that the additional 10 ft. will produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or detriment to nearby properties. (3) There is no evidence that grant of the requested variance will have an adverse effect or impact on physical or environmental conditions. (4) Grant of the requested variance is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable applicant to co-locate with others for communications purposes, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. (5) The use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of properties in adjacent Zone Districts. The property contains a 100 ft. tall wireless telecommunications tower, and the new tower is a Page"?-December 7, 2000 ApplNo. 4162: 1000-108-4-11.3 (Sprint) Southold Town Board of Appeals replacement, with an additional 10 feet in height. (6) The variance requested is not substantial. RESOLUTION/ACTION: On motion by Member Tortora, seconded by Member Collins, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the application, as applied for, subject to the following CONDITIONS: 1. That a fully operational light be placed at the top, and continuously used and maintained (for aircraft visibility purposes (to and from the Mattituck Air Base); 2. That only one monopole structure or tower may exist on the property. VOTE OF THE BOARD: AYES: MEMBERS GOEHRj ER, TOI�QQRA, LLINS, and HORNING. This Resolution was duly adopted (4-0). j;/ 9 ' GERARD P. GOEHRINGER / CHAIRMAN 12/20/00 :7D BY tdj:3 Ike ,: R �. c atm ./.� ;_iri.d C, ,1 ,„„ ra c, .i v 1 rn w: .,..,.. �,.a WY'r'�"`°k_3,e`er j _. . . ,,,a, a�` .as . ritritia-“Wriftil 1`4•I'4-44W''4 '" '' ' -baa. ,t - - -— `^r1 ri-: i " ,,,ff . , ?.,."s`: �"zi# � d 1"-.F' `�-" x..` ma y" ss` y` '� 4..r Cela -Lnnn 4 1 e5 ;y � fes^*" Vie„ •m f@ y a �xA R. STATEOFNEWYORK) rtur aptrh x )Ss: /,C7-GZ-9 "' • �g w, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) .Sol e .�©. ! a J'es n ttri FA ,lA a- r to • , c'•t. 't - t m m va a - e �IC�.� (1fa1 `1UJ��(:h said •o t (t a �® ��a : { t dc1 county,being duly sworn, ci al `� I.I �,,., - clerk of THE SUFFOLK T �e aper, •:a �, „ 3 msa, .•• , published at Mattituck hold, l ' gswi a' n a „ >�, b ,; County of Suffolk and Ste it the "" Notice of which the an has 6 a;�,, .i a ` ' been regular ublishet�0 t.� i • i a s a nr9 spa 9 Y p once ., as ,y „ s�& „ • each week for i- i u ivety, • :"` sas J s ;a 1 s.� • a00 a, ,•® commencing on day: va, • PB J eat s of _ ` ," ¢ %� 5 < e; n r ! -'at, a t .,42',lu {��1Y -4 , ; t " Principal Clerk C a s i 3 S C Y -H b A l in-'� , y Sworn to before me this a ' alt't & .. day of C4-. 2000 i '< " i .� CHRISTINAT.WEBER _ p +; ; i, a .i�f� "fir+ '+-. ,a� • sl Notary Pubic,slaia Ol Ne,Yor1( NCI. `^ n(�,�, -2-!l, t. a s e < v ."•. `� No.O1WE6934554 l.�t l J U ' a S" a a _ u. Qualified in Sullch Cc Qn0,�0-� "q"'� ° .`_ mss_ u, (A- r� cn• Exp:rss occer 1-h— tr', ,,�+ ^as li „7Y:.. ..„01.?-1 -f3+1 " < III,:Section 100-33A, based on the pursuant to.Article XXIV,Section y .t ",,� d'` c., a -� u>„ .� 'y '' Building Department's may 31,2000 - 100-241G.Subject properly does not ::.vr.;;. g "�, 3 ,y, `2, z Tic.�-�, �K"'�q�,t' .� ,� Notice of Disapproval for removal of contain a permitted principal use ;� �i t I. , •ra� _. , t i¢ ra a ;the.existing tower and to construct „ 1141A. ursuant to Article XIV,Section I00- . . cv "„ ®' a - r •new wireless communication tower 141A An accresory use cannot east f ^€ 1 t a € a ,:t e a S "t ii -, --<'� at a height exceeding 20 feet above without a principal use f' { k �'�. „ ,�7`3`'�C�;aa she average.height of buildings with- 9110 p.m. App4 Na 4880 j„j," r.� ,6 e §L ,a a --. rt«d ma e: ' .- t itt 300 feet of the factTity The height HEAD START CIBLD DE•VEF,. t Il B as r is proposed at 110.+-w,feet from OPMENT SERVICES, lNF4i (for 1 �t a i a « 'a - - , e 4 ground. Location of Property: 4.15 tuerly Church of the Opetx=Doot). �? i "" o�, 7 'r��', �'as.� �.,' '`�+ „ ,'r„e� `y T Elijah'sLane;Mattuuck NY:County This is, a request for a:Specral s=t ,.. ,� -. � ..' i7 v" g i r �ti Tast Map No.:1000108-4 113:Zone Exception for_Nursery School active a ,;h,' ; t - �. 1 tl o '. '. District•Limited Business.' tics.A nursery school is listed.asan ` ti' • - t -815 p.m.: Appl No."4826 '- .authorized use Ina e Zoning Code=- , x' ', ', `ram `, "`` g1 WILLIAM PENNY/fIDY CAR• under Article Section A'1004 > `r o.- " nartc* ''.60: cs -' ,(Continued hearing-postponement 31B(4).The.property is zoned:,R-80 ?' f di '"t ' � tae • ""' s"�` ,svt a 'requested by agent 8/18!00).Corner Residential.and is known as1850 .-4Tl, �, ,j`r -� t of:C.R. 48 and Youngs Avenue, Main Bayview Road,Southold,NY af�'f `•`�.- ,47.0,t,"- ' '�.. Southold, NY; 11100-55-5-2.2.-Zone: ,County Parcel No.1000-75.9-28 t„ , h _, gar,, B,General Business The Board of Appeals will at the; ar it ul llcl c,t ba x.. ,' 8:20 p.m.App4 No.4864-MAR above[ire and place hearallpersons •. • site " _�,,�,,, TIN ROSEN. This ts1-any Appeal or their representatives dgstrmg to - r €s `t.,s is " 100 i *�' -requesting�a-RevetsaloftheBuilding be heard or'to submit writtenstate7 a'' ' '" -& .t , •r :De artmcnt s Revocation of.Permit menta before the hearin is conclud rung • It. a c �*` :.,p� o . � .r P ( g 44 ding De ` ,. ,9 1 .- 1t No,265at 1 dated August 14,2000 ed).The hearing will not start easlier tai ':,nv,® :".4,1,-.4.," r'y-".�+„ regarding sham radio tower which :than designated. Files are available ., t t e ` , •sts at 11780 Sound Avenue, for review during regular:Town Halls .;s� `•Mattituck,NY;Parcel No.1000-141- busin• ess hours(8,410. S 4 p m.) If you have .,,..„...i,'- ei A a' �•Lt ,yt'3-44 Zona.LI Light Industrial.The questions, please do not'hesitate to i'';' '' "t s',,gT'S*1 - `°` a'` a.' reasons stated in the Disapproval are call(611)765-1809 , ` 'j ry a �. ss"follows: "Pursuant,"to'^Article Dated:September 25,2000 „ '� � .0: +' ..aria at d+.;• > atma r w ' �'�•� J.-. ,s 'n'°" ' r„ 4. 4,2100permit issued in error when GERARD P .w?; on eu di as• ,',, ,, r,;. =,9 c m, ,. "it ubject d not have been issued in GOEHRINGER,CHAIRMAN .,-,--k e €: gugo •cam << o� ` I�s= , . ., '°.accordance with the application law 1556-1TS28 ite• 4, „ [ - -Xiaa ku i Subject property, in LI Zone;had a ,. hp+ 's e,a `]'tiwa' ai' + pro extstmg nonconforming dwelling , , ..,� i .44- 'T' as 7— ..,.al use. This use was lost :Z• c n.z ; d'3 ' -ryB , �"nyD W-- il� 4 tm, a* •' 9 1.: , aiin- o O• a1vm4;:t Rp. - — - ;:i ,} 'SA A 8 ' ^•..' m %' baa II •rwn' 7 a • '� ,...48-4,4.A.1._;'4" i €M isal a W - ii q • -, a ' , ' % ,_-_ ii -.>: 10 d :4,',..411`F411"-;: >e•' A. ,n,pe, a a ,'tw .r1,-;',.: 41:114. 4.31‘4=4I44444444 . , '• 011 ,•y;N -y1 ., , '. bJ J .-..b y ., gxno-�i.. "`r uestin {8 w t -non ' ' �'"5.- . ,e a � 'Jet r� . ` .:.,,,-,-.7r' .a �, 'i t e Bete i t r' .. oval 4 i4'- a)siding any pori, -,;.,.,44:414. 9 'tit' *b 1 ep,4:tit thee 'ppadd 8 cee' tondefinitont'ofg ot°jarea..-A ' E K;i` bee r`$sear`..y d idsteaJ of a front ya s _ i ter ottt Section 100-13.'Location of Properryt based on the definitions of Sectio (13ea _. fin= a ent d Way off the North Side;of ,3W-13; and/or 1:0 a7,iiiiasee Lind 1f yaz � '.�. Rightof- .2100 4.41 -L ne-,Matnm : Main (State Route 25) Onent: Article:X, Section 100-103C, for ":,72 ...,,/400.9g115,51:551‘11.'•' � Parcel 1000-19-3-9.8 and 9.9.,--0,55a-tr.--15. new Wine Tasting Barn,in additk ' Ppl. No 487 _ :'-7:15-i.m AppI,No.4887 V[C- toj the exising winery-producti+ W1Li,TAM:ZQUMAS(Owneek cm TOR*AND ELBA BRCK.This"is�a building, which ;based on,- Contnued'fiom t ,-er- request for a Variance imder'Atficle Building Department3;Septemb } 19 r`3000.hearingxalendarr).This'y`s"� 50GY Section 100-24413, based on '4[1'2000 Nonce' of Disapproval, i. t",equestfor a Variance:-under •ea C the Bisilding Departmentts October-i.'proposed for'tan:a ovorall Meng ectto 4100-244' based"=`on t� 5--2000 Notice of Disapproval for au. n: xceeding-60 ft.frontage.facutg 2� I g Departure is;i o - audition ,to dwelling r,R'hich, ill •Main+ Road (Stater., {cute 2: i �N`oico;of i. oval exceed 20% lot coverage maximum Cutchogue parcel 100003 1 1: 1 car newldwe ' .,:.y„-k-.„,I" " building area ,Location Pof "land1911 t, ,-t`) Y £-. 1 STATE OF NEW YORK) Fa back�a e I i +e o 2215 =Mimtehaha r -O0-p 'door iz'+I& " 62 + m,; dC , i a utevatd,Southol,d;Pgrg1,3000SL-- in - ; - ).SLS: "" �e ! . " -1,-„44,,i:---aw ^ t (MT" a.. Baxter D d CO OF S FFOL ft mmimumrequ amen for;p ," i 4t m Appi 4Jo ;8 fa equest"r`ior'a Ya and I1 i of 21,580 sq.YL in size.Location bf, j(ti RD W GOO'DkL-- mis-is `Article III i.i.„,-Jr.,,, \ 71'C.....Illll llll C Property, rel 5, 'Beebe Driver afequest.'oran Accessory=Bed'and Tton ihe,S , z...11 .1;.1.14- COltnty,he- my sworn,says w a'. , `- " Use by„S iL 31 °`2000 No -,0 - ' clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES 1° x r ide Iu, aron e�of a e' �. 1 z.o -- 88 113(14 Jar the rentor of u vii construct-n"8w ,int published at Mattituck, in the GLENN A'ND T'YONNE MCNAB-r 5 rooms in an owner sc� .tion.tower ata height exceeding 'on et V res'( ew`Abelsso " kl )ling,#or lodging'andsenmg i,,feetabove the baverage height County of Suffolk and State of! a o at t-mer r. .1::-: r_, To<t4onot :-.., lk., - . L 'i - dmP?. . .1?...:`."1-F414,1"heYe< I Notice of which the annexed i', ri i . - + ataoom+es i ,art st ° t. ' ro et1�t been regularly published in °t 1 I 1 - -i gof% G ooms s l atlyfeet from a rid-f. cahon- each week for bas 4 ' P Cental and suboi&nae to th'e" Property ''435 Ehlahs, (Lar 1 i I - ort .* z�pa'l' use :of'.the 'dwe ng. 3v'atituck County;.TaxlMap 3e commencing on theppret� ot" iff coati od, ocaion':of Property '8755-Fifth woo.108-4-11`3 Zones, istri of OQj 20 — locate a new dwelling with(do sort'' Stre'eet =New Suffolk; New-York; Lumted`Business - ' 1 d'aicei10O,011710-l33and'l4 ii,-- - ' '- 9 ` -M r zs;,`.*•,,....i,„-; r e d' lottof 40;101t-sgt ft:sem�' :T�,I t "0' ,t,'r e IIA ") d', 0 p.m.Appl Nol1 i -"requestatga dr _49 ,�� ,f,. :w 3t7AXWELL This is a-reque r i 7 $ oca` ' , s`iyi.i "- E,f,t"'tYanatidesunder,rnc�leSlll,Sc ,,,,. I :re_ w ".> 0 `;-pe&ity.a 65 o" •- "" . 10031 OW Schedule and-Article **-.regarding a`pati ra .0 r• Sworn to bef re me this rid Peconic NY Parcel4000:::98-14.4:5"r,'^ XXIII, Section 100 231B based on exists .at -11;'780;Sound ,Aden' p 1 36:50 'p.m. -Apel.-No -4890•_- the .:. Building Department's Mattituck NY parcel No 1000-14 day of I�, U • 2 JAMES AND- HELEN LECH• September-.i.1. 2000 Notice, of : 3-44:Zone:LI Light Industrial.T MNANSKI. This is a request .for-a Disapproval to locate an.addition to.---E-reasons stated in the Disapproval a CHRISTINAT. BER Variance - under Article XXIV, dwelling and fence. The addition is 'as.follows: "Pursuant 'ti*"Arti, Notary Public,State of New York Section 100-24413, based on the proposed with lot coverage for all XXVIII, Section 100-282B, T No.0118E6034554 Building Department's September building area exceeding the maxi Building inspector may revoke Qualified in Suffolk Color .2A" 11, 2000:Notice of Disapproval to mum 20% permitted;by code the building permit issued in-error wh Conmi0bn Eq>ves Dem - locate an addition to dwelling and fence will greater than b.5 feetin it should not 1tave'been sued ;. adt'tion is accessorygarage with a dteight aongtheside and �s.,. Accorda� he• ` tla }., ,, on of Pro ,_,� a_-Zb°� � .(,:skim!, _c i ayotipercege#Location ng a ,, ,, Y:Par �r ""re-exist,�ro� , sn'. velli 20+,eperceaYa=locffiion-of:proper-V. Orient,N�Par a�..� p Fig acoa�'otim!ng'd -NOTICE OF PUBLIC Kingt'Street,'Orientt.NY;Parcel 3.1:- -- -- - as-principal use. ''wast'.I HEARINGS 1000-.26-2-45. 7:35 p m Appl. No. `4879•;._ pursuant to Article* ed Sect' ` SOOTHOJ D TOWN 4.- • 6:55 p.m.Appl.No.4883 MARlRI PETER HENNESSEY,and MARY- 100-241.50-- perope .,dges I BOARD OP APPALS d .f. D. SHEA This is a-request for-a `ANN' FONTANA (Buckaneer contain a pemutted,pnncipal.i • ''i 13RS AY,+ - Variance under Article XXIV, Books). This is a request fdr,a pursuant to A'r'ticle XIV Searon l+ NOVEMBEg lb'-`Zgq .. Section 100-244B, based on the Variance under Article III,Section 141A.An accessory use cannot C: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN;' .: Building...Department's September 100-31 Bulk Schedule,based on the without a principal use." pursuant to Section 267 of the Town 11, 2000 Notice of Disapproval to Building Department's September The.Board of Appeals will-at' Law and Chapter 100 (Zoning), locate an addition to dwelling with a 11,2000 Notice of Disapproval for a above time and place hear all pers, Code Of the Town of Southold,the front yard setback at less than 35 'warehouse, or storage building, or their representatives desiring following applications will be:held feet at 1350 Smith Road, Peconic. which building area will bring the be heard or to submit written sir for public hearings by the NY;Parcel 1000-98-3-25.1. ._ . total lot coverage over 20%of the lot meats(before the hearing is concl. SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD-OF 7'00=pm^ APDL No 4885 EE sue Location of Property 4460 ed).The hearings will riot start,ea APPEALS at the Town Hall,530195 HARVEY flit This�e ist,for a -Depot Lane.Cut,hogue,NY Parcel —tthan deli ated.-,Files arm °'S Iviain RRoad Southold blew Cork; 'Variance'1 under iel 715.ale 1000 95"=.5-8 r „<-�; - ruble for revieeww'dunu s4u • ' 11971;"on"THURSDAY i�OVEM-`y &Section 400-244Bitbas"e�, it`i'ii he ' 710 p.m:App)JNo 4876 d-OR hail bu'meesss iroouurstm)Jc. f=:` BER 1 :12000 at-thettimes'liote'd 'Building)34iiitmentsi:.Septe#06i- ADoisr,- AND T7ADELEIlNNE 3 have questions pleasexlo nol-hv -below(or as soon thereafteraspossi= 19 2000?Noticer4,0sapprpvaJ;*+:SCHLAIEFER This isarequestfota tata"tdcall(631).765-1'809 ., ti: ble). : locate an addition to dwelling with a Variance under Article X "Section Dated:October 31 2000 - V " 5. 6.30=pm. f Sear yard setback at:.less than 50�eet -100-103C based-on,the.Building GERARD P.GOEHRII$GI Apps No4884- „ $UILDINGDEPT.ifhisisra S nest Locattomf,Pro 4 vote RI,x epartments September 14 t z. = f CI-fAIRM. q . 11000.-7�$ dhce 'of Disa ro'4 A licants SO OLD TO for a Aroai Wade'ion100 13 f th uh�,`au i u re. PP ¢ PLP y -- _,'°' '` -B anderAitic[eI SecfPon30Dj�39fthe 't0 s,-�;+ `l`a . *-* it;,t`` proposing an a&diuonxo antis-a-- 8•0 -`O�'.4PPEP Zoning Code,as.to whether or not 7:10 ,P n. Appi. No. 4889 nig commercial building with a new -Town-I hot-tub or Jacuzzi structure shall be RALPH and :CATHERINE- frontage facing C.R.48 at 103'feet. .. .53095 Main R • considered"swimming pool,"there.... CASELNOVA.This is request for a Project I nrltion:1670 House,47025 - EO..Box 1 by applying the same^fence enclosure Variance under Article III, Section C.R. 48 (a/k/a Middle Road), Southold,NY 11971-f standards-of Section 100-31C(4)(a). 100=31:Bulk Schedule,based on the Southold,NY;1000-552-23. .1609-1TN2 6:30 p.m. Appl. 'No- 4891._.- Building Department's September 7:45 p.m.AppL No.4882-ILA LY- JAMES MILLER.This is a request 11,2000,Noticeof Disapproval in this .-COR,-. AGRICULTURAL INC. ., for a Variance under Article XXIII, minor subdivision projects The. lot.- (Peconic.Bay Winery): Applicant is 5 FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE; May 31, 2000 TO Sprint Spectrum L.P. A/C Baxter(Attn D.Mueller) 1 International Blvd Mahwah NJ 07495 Please take notice that your application dated May 4, 2000 For permit to construct wireless communication tower and accessory structures at Location of property 415 Elijahs La Mattituck County Tax Map No. 1000- Section 108 Block 4 Lot 11.3 Subdivision Filed Map# Lot# Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds proposed project to remove existing 100 foot tower and construct a 110 foot tower not permitted pursuant to Article XVI Section 100- 162B.3 which states- Wireless communication facilities on telecommunications towers are a permitted use, but shall not project higher than 20 feet above the average height of buildings(excluding signs, fences and walls) within 300 feet of the facility, or, if there are no buildings within 300 feet, these facilities shall not project higher than 20 feet above the average tree canopy height in that radius measured from ground level. If there are no buildings within 300 feet of the proposed facility site, all telecommunication towers shall be surrounded by dense tree growth to screen views of the facility in all directions. These trees may be existing on the subject property or planted on site. The base of the tower shall be located at least 100 feet from the nearest dwelling unit and 300 feet from any landmark property or district listed by federal, state or town agencies. • Height of proposed construction exceeds 20 feet in height above existing structures within 300 feet of the facility Note: Planning Board Approval Required Authoriz-. gnature a u il u 1 • i —11111 r^"�, B�'`.0 OF HEALTH t RAY - 4 2000U FORM "NO. b 3dS OF PLANS I TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SURVEY • BUILDING DEPARTMENT ' CHECK t ELM. • TOWN HALL SEPTIC FORM Tows SOUTHOLD SOUT1IOLD, 'II.Y. 11971 TEL: 765-1802 • NOTIFY: /� Laa-2y RE CALL Los tf e• Endued , 19.... MAIL TO Approved , 19.... Permit No. Disapproved a/c • (Building Inspector) APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Date March 9 xg.2000 INSTRUCTIONS a. This application must be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and suhnitted to the Building Inspector cit 3 sets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan sharing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship.to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and giving a detailed description of layout of property Host be drawn on the diagram which is part of this application. c. The work covered by this application may not be cainenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such permit shall be kept oo the prrenises available for. inspectiai thra out the work: ' ' e. Na building shall be occupied or used in whole or:in part'for any purpose whatever until a Certificate of Occupancy shall have been granted by the Building Inspector:;: APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Tocn of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or Regulations, for the construction of buildings, additions or,alterations, or for removal or demolition, as herein described. The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, building code, • code, regulations, and to adnit authorized inspectors on prenises and in bui_�l.dciin=n,,a�►� ssary i ' s. (Signature of-app1 t, or �e, i corporation) kirk(KvEc fJt- • ane,iintgrnAtional, Blvd;,,A4Ativ h,.PA..97495 . (Mailing address of applicant) • State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder Lessee Nate of owner of premises William J. Baxter, Jr. and Jane. P. Goeller (as on the tax roll or latest deed) If applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer. N/A (Nate and title of corporate officer) Builders License lb. Philters License No. • Electricians..License Na. Other Trade's License lb. I. location of land on which proposed work will be done 415 Elijah's Lane Mattituck/Cutchogue House Nuiber Street Hanlet Canty Tax Map No. 1000 Section 108 Block 4 Lot 11.3 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot :(Name) 2. State existing use and Occupancy of pranises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing mmp and occupaz�c}r Public Utility (Telecommunications) and accessory buildings b. Intended „cs, and occ Public Utility (Telecommunications) and related equipment cabinets. 1.ILULC UL hVL(. LUKUL MI31,]I appmm auJLe): mew nuiiuing nonsiion .. ni[eja ion ;• Repair ..... a1liti Other 4ylork keplace existing '1du monopole with new iib'.monopoles?irate"'a t exis°?ing"antennas of Ix nine 17_r_4141rk.dh"al te1'est telecommunication antennas; and: install •related equipment cabinets. at base of pole. 4. Estimated Cost ..s1a ,QQa:Q4..(.aPP.r4X•) fee (to be paid on filing this application) 5. If dwelling, number of dwelling units N/A limber of dwelling units on each floor If garage, tinier of cars ...N/A Public utilit,yy. See 6. If business, eamercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of useQlteSti.Q0..He41... p{] 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if:any: Pront h.it4Pole and Rear ..11 Depth 42' 10' 1 and 7'3" x 11'3"x 10'high, one-story equippment Fkigtht Number of Stories shelte� Dimensions of sate structure with alterations or additions; Front .Q/� Rear Depth Height .................... tinker of Stories 8. Dimensions of entire new rnnctruction:' lh4 i2,k1.7Qlr.P]QOPP.QI�. liar Is lit�i lbeiht. Number of Stories g• size of lot: Front ,.i97:5Q .......... Rear ..W4)-.:47' Depth 475.60' 10). Date of Pu- rchase. ..05fQ1j61........ Name of Fewer Owner Procon, Inc. 1i. Zone or use district in which premises are situated Limite(1, Bu>i;rlegs ,District Sec. 160= 16213, 100-163 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation: BIA1k.Sche.dule..for .BusineDi acrid! 13. Will lot be rebtaded Will excess fill be removed fran premises: YES MX 14. Nares of owner of premises William . Baxter,Jr• Address 2.2;5.6. Paimer Ave.?.NQwRochell'Ei No, .... Gane P Geller Birch Lane,'!reenwich';'dt"' Name of Architect P,aPs1Y..Eng1llAeC]Iig4CDJ15tr1tct:TQfMddress 100 Hil1.epi. Jerdey Phone N0201:93.4..28 Nate of contractor To be determined Address Phone No. 131. Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? * YES N3 .X....... *IF YES, SQi71IW ua;TS31M= PERMIT HAY'BE REQJIRED. PLOT DIAGRAM Locate clearly anddistinctly all buildings, w3hether.existing or proposed,'and indicate all set-back dimensions ran property lines. Give street and block number or description according to deed, and show street nares and indicate Nether interior or corner lot. See Plans i /NEW JERSEY oviE O(:)Eit t , SS ARM 0P ..BERGEN Don Mueller being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the applicant gate of irxlividlial signing rontrart) rove Director, Site Development N.E. for Sprint Spectrum L.P. , applicant, 2 is the (Contractor, agent, corporate officer, etc.) %x#i>Itd akii4VXX51 Yd4aates', and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this pplication; that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief, and hat the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. coo to fore me this ' ,� f� Sp Sprin S• Notary Public ,'ERH 1tVE vSKIN(i • ' -° Nota1yPWblM,BltttsoINowJersey (810ptluto`ot Apptitent) N mi40G Qan/N✓EcG L. MY emissiosslon Expires Dececember30,2004 09)400n/4f firi G£v6wv+ SNE Ttrv44 OF SOUTHOLD,. HEW YORK em, sta 1C /s7/eo APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR AI I%EAL NO. 418C:),C,0, DATE TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF 5OUTHOLD, N. Y. (We) •Sprint S�ectrim] . P. of 1 International p,],yc1, Name of Appellant Street and Number Mahwah New Jersey ., .HEREBY APPEAL TO Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION FOR PERMIT NO, .N/P.. :., ..., . . . DATED Max 47 2000 WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO Sprint Spectrum L.P. Name of Applicant for permit of 1 Internati• onal Blvd.? Mahwah, New Jersey07495 Street and Number Municipality State ( ) PERMIT TO USE ( ) PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY ( X) Permit to construct wireless communication tower and accessory structures i LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY 415 Eli,jahs Lane, Mattituck LimAesi.,&1451tae.ss .District Street /(lam\e$ / Use District on Zoning Map District 1000 Section108 Block 4 Lot 11.3. Owner William J. Baxter, Jr. and Map No. Lot No, IflJane P. Goeller APcaxx wxfl Prior wi ,- r . r 2. PROVISION (5) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number, Do not quota the Ordinance.) Article XVI Section 100-1626.3 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for (please check appropriate box) ( X) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chop: 62 Cars. Lows Art 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4 PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous`appeaIX(X )O (has not) been made with respect to thls decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property, Such appeal was 4 ) request for a special permit I ) request for a variance and was made in Appeal No. N/A Dated REASON FOR APPEAL ( ) . A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 (X ) A -Variance to the Zoning Ordinance ( ) is requested for the reason that the height of proposed construction exceeds 20 feet in height above existing structures within 300 feet of the facility. Faun oat (Continue on ether side) • REASONS FOR AREA VARIANCE ONLY (to be completed.4k applicant) ; Do not use these standards for "use variance", Or "special exception." (Also attach sheets if necessary, with 'bignatgrde .)' 1. An undesirable change will NOT be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, if granted BECAUSE: An approved monopole already exists on site. The proposal calls for the replacement of the existing monopole with ,a new structurally sound monopole 10 feet greater in height. If the applicant were unable to replace; the existing monopole as requested, a second monopole in the same vicinity would have to be erected. 2 . The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by pomp method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than anarea variance BECAUSE: In order to eliminate the applicant'sservice gap in• the Mattituck-Cutchogue area, the applicant must establish an antenna facility at a height above ground level determined by its radiofrequency engineers. There are no other existing structures within' the search area of sufficient height.. ' 3. The amount of relief requested is not substantial BECAUSE the applicant seeks to replace the existing monopole, with. ,a monopole only • 10 feet greater in height.. • 4. The variance will NOT _have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighbarhood. or district BECAUSE the antennas in !question will • operate within limits set by the •FCC. The monopole will have no greater visual impact on the surrounding area because of it design. S. Has the alleged difficulty been self-created?;,, • ( ) Yes. ( X ) No. i 6 . This is the minimum that is necessary and adequate, 'and at the same time preserve and protect the Character. of •the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of. the community. 7. The applicant is a public utility for zoning purpoJ s. The instant applica- tion is necessary in order for the applicant to pro0 1 reliab - �rvice to' its licensed coverage area and. is obtrusive /// o•,.achi/ hat goal. STATE OF NEW -YORK) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) (Applicant) i Agent must attach written consent from owner. Don Mueller, Director, Site Development, :N.€1 Sworn to before me this Vie, d r) of + , AlVp00 t '4k Lk Notary Public cATmssINEHOSKVNe J Notary Public state of New Jersey txtlk/form.varltemp' eembee3o,2004 , • • • Reason for Appeal Continued. Zoning Board of Appeals re : Gordon and Madeleine Schlaefer Pursuant to Town Law section 267b-3 the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals is to analyze and assess the personal benefits anticipated by the applicant against the potentially deleterious effects that a grant of the relief requested would have on the health,- safety and welfare of the effected neighborhood or community. In perfoliuing this balancing test, the Zoning Board is charged with the responsibility to consider the five factors enumerated in Town Law Section 267b-3 (b) . The variance should be granted for the following reasons : 1 . No undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, if the variance is granted. See Elevations : The addition is beautiful, with a covered front porch with Rocking Chairs and planter boxes. The porch and large windows will make a classic building. Reduction of the size of the building will take away from the classic colonial features of the windows and porch because room will be needed for the display. The proposed area for the addition is where, off and on, the sales tent has been placed and the trucks deliver and unload the merchandise. This will be eliminated by the addition and redesign of the loading platform in the rear of the building. A ramp to the full basement will keep the property looking neat and undisturbed. The surrounding development of Route 48 in the commercial strip by the 1670 House consists of the following from West to East : All Over 60 ' ' Generator Sales : 120' Willow Hill Motor Vehicle Repair 75 ' VanDuzer- Propane sales/retail sales of Propane products 120 ' Southold Square Strip Shopping Center- McCarthy' s 220' Village Shopping Center- ice cream cove 150 ' Windsong building front building is 36 ' with 27 ' added fence and canopy to along the width of the property to add space; rear building is 48 ' property is only 109 ' in width Wheeler' s Garage (next door) - repair garage entire property covered with cars and building complete visual clutter west bldg 56 ' and east bldg 24 ' with at most 15 ' between the buildings Hairdresser is 24 ' on a 56 ' wide parcel The design of the addition will be a beautiful colonial building the look of a very luxurious house, the addition is recessed and the covered porch will reduce any visual mass of the building. The footprint is actually 10 ' covered porch entry alcove . Also the change in roof lines (reverse gable design) breaks the lineal appearance of the building The intent of the 60 foot rule was in place to restrict strip mall development, it is not intended to penalize existing businesses (with single uses) from expanding. This business is extremely desirable and less intense than the surrounding businesses . This addition with the fine Architectural design of Garrett Strang will be an asset to Route 48 in this area. (See proposed elevation) 2. The benefit sought by the applicant can not be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The original house was from the 1600 ' s, interior renovations/alterations to the existing building are cost prohibitive under the NYSFP&B Code. A modest addition was completed in 1986 on the west side and is visible only from the rear. The proposed addition is needed for furniture display. The placement of the addition is important because the rear yard is to be used for truck delivery and storage of their. . own delivery truck and delivery of the furniture. Now they have off site storage requiring frequent deliveries, the addition will provide on premises storage reducing the deliveries . If the board reduces the size of the addition the need for off site stabrage continues . 3 . The area variance is not substantial . The application of the balancing test weighs in favor of the grant of the variance . The addition must be designed in keeping with the design of the building and to function for display of the furniture. Furniture takes a large display area and the existing facility is inadequate. The Planning Board is considering reducing the parking so as to provide more landscaping. The landscaping will also reduce the look of the addition. 4 . The variance will have no adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district . 5 . The alleged difficulty was not self-created. The conditions of the property, topography and narrow lot, create the difficulty. 6 . The variance requested is the minimum variance rTh practicable given the personal benefits anticipated by the applicant. We respectfully request that the appeal be granted; together with any further relief that is deemed necessary and reasonable. 01 . . ///ei) signature State of New York ) ) ss County of Suffolk ) / Sworn to this %(E, day/Vbw4 2-00 Notary Public 1r 3 TOWN O 50Ui'H LD PROPE 'TY RECORD CARD '°,. , /Doo 0 �2- - ` OWNER STREET 5 VILLAGE --MIST) UB: LOT A/ 7 FORMER OWNER v` oft T- �S ' S W TYPE OF BUILDI11 '/-� , -1 ~j' t.... '`.....e :.' ' • '1 i r `l �i��y'i_,r __.--._._�— NG RES. r� SEAS. VL. FARTvt` COMM. CB.• MICS.-‘ Mkt. Value 11,n°I �'/ LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS, co z. . q/ / ' /3NM t� r 320 .; 2 , _, ✓ GY/C �/ cIOQ • 1cac <u)./ _ ' — rs 41- A / /!.0 t? ♦ ♦ e sM sgivAIPAS J / / -. '2 A-o ( z7 3 nc -t. f .fin �/f .r' © �°fit"cc? .,C, FIl ( . l� ,xF :`� CAt�Gz et ( C� 1?; LO 4 1 CJ'!,,-, r / ' ' ' ' I. V i JJ c5 u- .�U ^� . � �J-' �"J --4,:iroF.- t i E' r t` F r � ,'' nad <QT — U ,s7O (�l U - e a o1-AGE — ABOVENORMAL, W " FARM J Acre VoAto lae Per V¢lue Tllioble > FRONTAGE ON W ER /a r< ' /i (� 7 FRONTAGE ON RAD Wotadltn21 < I:. r. t i > - ✓� ;/ J. Wo a plot y • BULKHEAD 1 - COLOR. [L TRIMI , .. . 1 ■.MI _ ■ tom I Mt L 1 f-' I 1 Y III III , tai, ,, _r___ _ 111:1 • ■■■■1111■■■■ ■■■■ j . -I 20Q. f �■■111■ ! '■■ ' i 1 I. B14 11111.111. 111111 ' <tension „co. u✓ I: ������ `,1 ctension / 1 i �..._ , ,-) Y r.. ,7.r /a&C I I ' dension Foundation Bath I - I Dinette rch Basement Floors I I K. arch - Ext. Walls Interior Finish I Lit eezeway I I Fire Place Heat I IDR. aroge Type Roof - Rooms 1st Floor I 1.1D BR. Dtio Recreation Room Rooms 2nd Floor I I FIN. B 1 -B %irI !/�.�uf;t4 6. jDormer Driveway otal '1 Dom, 6 it 4,2ti • PAPAY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC. 100 HILLTOP ROAD, RAMSEY,NJ 07446 201-934-2828 FAx: 201-934-1181 November 13, 2000 Mr. Lawrence Re, Esq. '��D'� 11/ `\ Munley, Meade, Nielsen&Re 32 Woodbury Road Ci54 Huntington, NY 11743 RE: Mattituck Site 33-688 Dist. 1000, Sec. 108,Block 4,Lot 11.3 Elijah's Lane& Rt. 25, Southold,NY Monopole Design and Reliability WO 1239 Dear Mr. Re: In response to your inquiry regarding the design and reliability of a monopole structure, Papay Engineering& Construction, Inc. offers the following: 1. The monopole structure is designed to meet the requirements of the ANSI TIA/EIA-222F (June 1996) titled Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures. It also meets or exceeds the requirement of The BOCA National Building Code and the Manual of Steel Construction ASD Ninth Edition by the American Institute of Steel Construction. Furthermore, the foundation and anchor bolts meet the requirements of the American Concrete Institute's Building Code Requirement for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-95). The pole itself is also designed to meet the provisions of the American Society of Civil Engineers (A.S.C.E.) Design of Steel Transmission Pole Structures which was originally published in 1973 and most recently updated in 1990. 2. Based on the location of the structure, the maximum TIA/EIA 222-F basic design wind speed will be used for the monopole design. For the New York/New Jersey area, the wind speed ranges from 70 to 85 mph. The design wind for Suffolk County is 85 mph. The basic wind exceeds the 50 year maximum anticipated wind velocity at 33 ft. above ground level. Additional factors are applied to increase the wind loading, e.g. a 1.69 gust response factor is imposed in order to account for sudden changes in wind speed, a height coefficient to account for increasing wind speed with height, and an exposure coefficient. An additional load case with ice is also checked, which uses 75% of the wind pressure with 1/2 inches of simultaneous radial ice. Based on these conservative coefficients, the structure could in fact survive even greater wind loads than the basic design wind speed without any failures. The monopole design is also in compliance with all state codes and guidelines. 3. The monopole structure design is controlled by wind induced loads, however, earthquake induced loads are also evaluated with all building code requirements being satisfied. Vertical loads (i.e., gravity loads) are minimal on these types of structures, approximately 20% of the maximum capacity. 4. The design and loading assumptions which are used for the analysis of these structures are very conservative in nature when compared to other building codes, as a result, structural failure is highly improbable. 5. Failure of a steel monopole structure is defined as being that point at which the induced stresses exceed the yield strength of the material. At this point, deflections will be induced in the structure which will no longer be recoverable once the load has been removed. Hence, a permanent deflection in the monopole would exist. 6. The induced loads must be sustained for a long enough period in order that the structure has time to respond to the load without its removal. Monopoles are flexible, forgiving structures which are not generally susceptible to damage by impact loads such as wind gust or earthquake shocks. 7. As the structure leans over from the induced loads, it presents a markedly reduced exposure area for the development of wind induced forces. This would result in the lowering of the applied forces and, therefore, the reduction of stresses and a halting of the structural deflection. 8. Hypothetically, let's assume that a pole becomes overloaded. The typical consequence of this overloading is "local buckling" where a relatively small portion of the shaft distorts and "kinks" the steel. Upon the removal of the applied load, the structure will not return to a plumb position. This does not cause a free falling pole. Even though the buckle exists, the cross section of the pole is capable of carrying the entire vertical load. As a result, wind induced loads could not conceivably bring this type of structure to the ground due to the excellent ductile properties, design criteria, and failure mode. 9. In an incident in Kansas City, a monopole withstood the impact pact of a run away bulldozer which rammed the monopole at the base. The monopole stood firm with only a dent in the shaft. After field repairs, this monopole is still in service and performing to its design capacity. 10. Extensive research has been conducted to determine if any monopole tower(steel tapered tubular)has ever failed. All research, which includes database searches as well as interviews with tower designers and city engineers, has concluded that there has not been a single incident in which a monopole has fallen due to natural causes. Fabrication of the monopole is performed by the manufacturer in accordance with the provisions of the AISC Manual of Steel Construction and ASCE's Design of Steel Transmission Pole Structures. All welding and inspection is in accordance with the American Welding Society's Specification D1.1 - latest revision. Testing and inspection reports are available upon request at the time of fabrication. In conclusion, due to the aforementioned items, monopole structures do not experience or have ever experienced "free fall" type failure due to wind or seismic induced loads. I hope that these comments address the issues which you might encounter relative to the anticipated performance of monopole structures and quality of steel and fabrication. If you should have any questions or require additional information, please call. Sincerely of NEW rc<<f 2- c ry Jar-IsJoit/� `��F,, % 066,6 CC\= PROFESSIe‘ Peter E. Papay, P.E., P.P. NY P.E. 64690 OMAR G. DELGADO Mailing Address: E-mail: Permanent Address: P.O. Box M-62 odelgado01 @msn.com 24 Central Ave.,Apt. 4C Hoboken,NJ 07030 odelga01@sprintspectrum.com Ridgefield Park,NJ 07660 (201) 373-1571 EDUCATION: STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,Hoboken,New Jersey 05/'99 Master of Engineering degree in Electrical Engineering. Concentration:Telecommunications Engineering. GPA: 3.75 STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,Hoboken,New Jersey 05/'96 Bachelor of Engineering degree.GPA: 3.278 Major:Electrical Engineering EXPERIENCE: SPRINT PCS,Mahwah,NJ 06/'99—Present RF Engineer:Designed and implemented a CDMA based PCS wireless system in Long Island,NY. Designed physical configurations for antennas and Base Station requirements.Performed propagation analyses using Planet software.Collected baseline data for cell site design and optimization.Optimized sites by performing antenna changes,downtilts,as well as cell parameters such as neighbour lists,neighbour priority changes,t-add and t-drop thresholds,search window thresholds,3-and-4 way soft-handoffs,etc.Analyzed traffic statistics and trends to define problem areas,monitor network performance,forecast future traffic demands,and design second carrier, third carrier,and handown regions.Performed isolation studies for site co-location with other wireless operators as well as National Environmental Protection Agency emisions studies to comply with exposure guidelines required by law.Performed and reviewed antenna system sweeps. Performed cell site candidate evaluations.Created coverage maps for town board meetings and various filing forms to comply with local zoning ordinances.Testified in front of town boards as RF expert. OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS INC.,Wayne,NJ 05/'97—05/'99 RF Engineer: Designed and implemented a PCS 1900 GSM wireless system in Long Island,NY. Designed physical configurations for antennas and BTS requirements.Performed propagation analyses using Xcalibur software by TeleworX and measurement integrations to adjust the tool.Collected drive test data for cell site design and optimization.Implemented antenna downtilts and various cell parameters such as handover margins,access thresholds,neighbour lists,etc.,to optimize site performance.Reviewed and analyzed traffic statistics to find site problems and monitor network performance.Reviewed intermodulation studies for frequency planning and assignments.Performed isolation studies for site co-location with other carriers.Determined link budgets and power levels for path balance.Reviewed antenna system sweeps.Performed cell site candidate evaluations.Produced various types of maps for different groups using MapInfo software Summer 1995 VTEL,C.A.,Caracas,Venezuela ENGINEERING AssIsTANT:Assisted in the design of trunking radio systems for the Police Department of the state of Aragua,Venezuela.Performed propagation studies in the design of a trunking radio system for E.D.C.,Caracas,Venezuela. SKILLS: Experience with MS-DOS,Win 3.1,Win95/98,MS Works,MS Office 95/97,MS Access, AutoCAD,MS Project,TAP,Lotus 123,MicroCap,Planet,MapInfo,Xcalibur,PlotworX,Paradox, Netexpert,Metrica,AutoPace,RSAT,Collect 2000,TEMS,Autoplex ECP/OMP. Apple Macintosh systems,NeXT workstations, SUN Workstations Programming:M68HC11 Assembly,Turbo Pascal,Turbo Basic,C++ Familiar with spectrum analyzers.Bilingual:English, Spanish HOBBIES: Audio,Video,Sports,Music,Photography Venezuelan Citizen •References furnished upon request r EMS-FM1111111MGENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 3, (> POE „P) 1. 1204=R0.2 FA^W?5 a-25551NO 1A5910A' 0 --"" a� IT OCE A N1 11 Too RDJRYE WMEAwf DEERE.POTAEE WED.CAS AAO SADDEN ETR 5110/055 Afi TOT EINE"0Qi 1001 ED.la SAC n51[S¢4R*15. J./ \ V / 2. DE 91 AYy.5&020*ar FO.a NOVO'.n,111 0000=..F M 5290 WED ANTENNA SCHEDULE(ALL CARRIERS) e--I.!/ Jl� / wN�W NCR AE K wRnEa AZA a ASaFLM. a J W 3 (� extract'PAD(5 au RN E A1:FJ.1NEc.cc.ER WAVE 51 .G1Z EIEWTON AND GOMM OF ANTENNAS CO,NNEL.Y&UJSTON J:7 -.4.\!. / �j AZ NOT PRYNu fi-LW'?rfi 0.tT.PEEKED. CARRIER ANTENNA YODEL AND STATUS REFEREma SECTORS PER SECTOR A20Nf16 COMM 535 ELIJAH S UNE J/ 'R' Ei3 i \E9 / 9/S.. 1 mi PW N'Oswiss,9.-$a o.N i M[Ra.DWAE Pr.C_ 941011 084899012tH(PROPOSED) 110'(TOPS) 3 3 340,110,230 CPS UN AT 110' VAZ�T;;CK,NY 17952 J:-/ \ / .S o 001:0-07000 v:cT;TN9R/0K D�a-a:010451 E.EH CURRENTLY THREE ANTENNAS EMT PER /--C.,/ '\ / p� 4 Eolo(.Sas AS NE 0(10575 AIN WIRELESS SEANCES ALP 11011-N(D STIC) 98'(CENTERLINE) 3 4 5°,159,240 i f, SECTOR FOUR AE PROPOSED PER SECTOR ` J% '\ / -1 s AmwA EIMER N6 NE CREED Num $Mt-08-09011-OD(PROPOSED) 90' COSTING IMPS ON E70TENG POLE TO 8E 1'''l v ( ) (TOPS) 3 4 3°,150,270 REPL/f2O sax Rya maws SHORN PERE \O\ J/ \ F " (\ 6 Prorol lS 211 0.aa0OCCr0 0 11 D FRO 5450CER CC um O 014.RETS W' •\!1' /'.. 4' i \ NOONES 614 Ig01 S WEW1[fRa D0 1C ca 4 INE%DETECTOR a PAPA,'ICO POUTER RODE RANSLY.NI 077440 ENGINEERING&CONSTRUCTION. INC. VEfi291 TIMELESS At.P9D11E(PROPOSED) 80'(TOPS) 3 4 102.222,342 CPS tINET Al SHELTER ROOF 1- : �ti' ./,..t, Nw.NE61.a[A'AAR lee smar[WENT.Avg SEE a ra r;RaE(.Eo-ivTai MOUNTED 1GNf TO POLI USW TRI-BRACKET rJ/ SHINER 201-9}0-ma OMMONT EMS RA90-17-02011(COSTING) 65'(TOPS) 3 1 30,ISO,270 ASSEMBLIES AND Ta-SECTOR ASSEMBLES rJ% I. SPunr un r,R¢a.Lr MESS DC LaRoan BP AmEnaFn m cf.j.' Oy ES/ my mans a lar OR EAEYENTS NE 51Xm \ '�J% ,z-1. TENT \ C. P1AS NC Cl 10 IC 5012*71131 PIANS ND WEEN 10 B A pa:oxwl6 (47. / yf.RN 011114 MT 07.01Y00.SS DixgWnaz L DC ME APE M..EAStrEs 5ua�.RY \ J% ' -.\ 10 EEO ALL NO02111 6 As 50001/0 OR ref CONTRA',500116102 /� N. � . • i 9 AND TO TIC lamee N a A B.O.[LIQ 15 81550 910 ran Dor PROJECT SBE • ��� L '\ Jj �. 0� \ Jl 610 1"P 255.MN ALL[moms CO RAECT10 ra cookDo MEW.JECTSE L '\ �' '\ Jl APO 11225 510(a Nl HOMED HON TIC IP MIME ORD R5511l/ N-J lrue -\ T2./ �. \ 1511MCCOSI �Cda1605 TWNIEERE WE BE 0CE1TRETOR 9..50 EE P�FOR 0) 095...) O'�% O tg 561002000 611605 RLE NL CONTRACT ME NEWS.5509[09106 NE \ V 0 DOENSEFS A�a9a:a A BO r THE CONTRACTOR 01WiAVRB T.ALL,../i/ 211. •.\ Jl / .SEK NAP RE ACOwRyED AS OiPK[m w DC GOMEZ CM ECIS. Sprint Spectrum L.P. 1340 /: ti0 `SSE 10.m[xsaxs SHwx on 10 Pr6x SWAM 04055 mNEars NDIm SPACv6 Crossroads Corporate Center \ / DEI.Ea 1100NENI a 0.01010 WARE.5KRROO,n a 101[6.10 RIO 1 International Blvd. Ste. 800 • 5[561 AL 02[0506 90010 1(605 BE 0017 6215706 5[5210)6 111 COMER •/• \ .11 / 0001(215 ERa11E moo/N Boa Ni261,tIE CO011RP1,N 901E RE Mahwah, New Jersey 07495 j ''�B> 'es *[54111052[FOR OB,AM16*520(0[1052050700 law 116 0Ns00ATCN WWA5 Phone: (201) 512-4700 / 105 IO PROEM..ON INE.ORA 110' 4b'�/ �>'-0.%� ':•\{7 Fox: (201) 512-471} 7 / �'L' • • / 11 13 CaRo[.a PALL COON AL 0115 510 001 AND AIn1052IM1Es W 1. \ / IT 1)6 551005 EN[11N 2.SEK a NB LEN x01 aLALY 155020 a ENDED 230' 4' / •\ er 701E MVO mcw61z SPRINT ORIENTATION 5(202 7 '°6‘ o _� EXIST UIILm / 12.x2010111(005 a S RE rxl1 TRUES EN OCCOMANE 100 o OR iihNEACOSER INCE lnr01 COAs %• 6 `�` POLE `•- / 4l N REEL/TM INC NQc0ax1E. \**•*''...... HUNTER /' R' �./ l0 Ti ISO CaKKTa MAL(016T 7)0 mrbTW[10)vAVAG[R a AD PRWKa N 0E6 WU AS"ExiSlta- NC NOT 10210 TO DE Al DE FED. r---41,„,1PPfOK) N COS coon 06807-1809 / sto�Rf, \� 'I� '� 109889 940 /•/ /- \.\. 1N.Al.SEK vE1aNED Aro Nov[1Rw51¢1A[Lm 51al1 R w ERK1=CRONE `\ 10 UTEOE5 `i / 1/er7ZOlttwireiess \ ti CON NI A41RRADR EWES REMATCH AVD 011p*15*1 W SS.au 110)602 % �.1,\S1�\AOJsf, /' �^'/ / Renis REMANACOR TCH 00 CDT 5250 Mao Ai'li�c raaR a r \ % 1101 OF �pfl % / ENCTICK 61s 0 5DEARENNEI A. 1101 Ce NODE DE ESE 205191)90/0 et aW1 H NEOLAI NY 1ROAOD \ / CLEARING s5. 'S •/` / •/ EXIST.MPA CODES THE WEE ELECTRO COC[AND Nott COO.SPCOfE66602 (516) 294-1090 \ /' Sy '°6' L�-p9 ti 0 a// / •/pS NDERCROUND 15 NA co 5111 O RI600210 M Sim Ammo(ETH NL CIT.STATE Nm CKS 102' \ .m, 0 .,5' .9.‘‘' �~ /./ /.�' SPLICE 801 o.SEW won al01.QON102 / m •/ s (PROJECT NUMBER S`' •� ry' 16 Al 1(25 KOPPE MEOW 5TAIL H INSPECTED AP APPROVE PAYIR 10 2x7 %> o�P� e's tih ) ,// ' ..••••"-/ ti cwauNE61 a suN no 1239 1 i>OU52xC THE mAa[a 116 10Nt.THE PROPERTY o1NERT5).015 CYRO1[C5, VER20N ORIENTATION / /_/ \s �~ a> •j/ / 3// *;'%. 15 SEEDS.CENTS.RXWa AND MORS S.T.9e MERE ro coup,AP DRAWN BY /' AP /a/ A S\ '71. a /• / 4.4./..,,,r EOM An NOR/PRENES mN@.l a SEAL 50904E AND e J a ,1•� �. /;/ /ti g/ � I J.D.P • j 0 / C DC 06 CEO.SPEE10noo,PERE052Nx)[AVD 061NWRIN a WED 101ENEM CHECKED DIF / d' / ♦ S } •/ 7R' (fir/ 9e 7s .n1m,INE EaPw[61 mw u6 u[t65vw90Lm a 01005.116 mx1W[,m // S /" �� ` .. /`/a • • i! 302 ti•` /• w WAIS 05AArp0 00 COORDINATE D oTKa PTRfONM MTH bCr ERR Kw or nos P.E.P. NEIGHLEY / // ol. > % / �'1 9p mya AN P0aORNED 61 MICE NO DATE ISSUE • 27 CASE AVENUE / \' Q l 7 h' / 19.Snl Nl 6110 2*55O iWPoNa TIRE Wim A4[RBI.ES Wn u1 16TE0 AND r$ PATCHOGUE,NY 11772 • \\�a �• ' . /�/ /; ma AwRatO W¢aws.Au EnERIw rcxnwias sWu E4.wlalama. D 07/1x/02 A14tovAt /•/, ,•. \`.'> A \ S•/�/ b /, M OnNS A0[MI[Pm(0 Tfl LOI[ND 010001 a[ESS>I NvrOR YtafG100 WT \,WA> % / Jo ryO0 S \�c, 7 EI5. f'`.�/ „��j 01 0000610 EOURE 03 P01 Off 11(Rom SONS w m1mTIa5 9n+Nmsulaa N. `p /' a ``. `- rT' .` •j' }0 % 2).THE mnRAsrm 9lul DEE Nl 0011201 PRws6Ns 70 PROW NL DE. COIPOIITD / `7dA, \ %' NEN a 50 POET 511[5009%WIII NKK ON THE waive a 1100102 1111' //' P e� �\�^ - '\.�a�•/ /' �S��y IBD521 Au'llrz1015 'RE AREAS AND Wu u BE aro 10 DOR C2iOW.DC m01Or THE 01 • h0. �I` J % �J�.1)P UPON CwROEx a THE.SEA ./• / •. O JI % �' 22*00 PRO52a AREA RUN AM 107100 NRR THROUGHOUT 710 MAIM a IM /, �\ oo �ii� 0 / i' 70 Ewa 10E 051SE 111075 PPR a 0r HE pain 1f11WF 502555 w NOT tum GlASS • '1. O' / . 4' CUM COPECK NRR TROY PAA.SPOTS.WE.a 9.50,5 a AY7 Wi1Q % 'A b0 •;.../. 4` �7� RENO AND PAM Al OM.SaSAC($NAT WK BEEN OWLET a 0116R.a[ \ 10. •O ./ j % �� IQE/ [B[E100 BF THE 10K SWI THAT THEY BIER PRN ADREN1 SuRECI5 10.1152 01212001 Pall P13aN Al MIKE ANO PAlam6 A0 REARM 10 \ /.../ O\ 4•> ,/ s1O�"o b 0 EXISTNG 151005 ♦ O\� r Root AXES ra THE ETALWCN a MOMS PARR a 13 1EAC Al 4 ibr `\ •/ 5E --.3.,_,-- • 91004 15150020 @� I t x015 W 01011 r a CO 0*00 SUR55LL5 5111)000RE-al1ID a Su'-M O� /" E Al Ms swl BE LOGRO Ano raanm sNa 152 nQ sTRunwN M1EaRn APPROVALS %' - . ® / BUILDING TO REMAIN% 00 a 11¢SPREE 5 NM CE PRwSEO \ /: \ �/ /• %' '1PI'. �I' z•.W 4 A&EWE!OBIAD CA MRS u mMAa1R1ICTIONVMS¢ PROJECT MANAGER: DATE._ \ ,- -® o,* i/• 1�y ' FOR SUCH DEMANWS EXISTING 1 STORY ~ SPRINT REP: DATE. ` / 4' i. % HIM CO[IMCIN LEL SIAEIM1 AND EEO ME PORN 119x6 THE 61 \ / `• ` AGGREGATE TELECOM %' 250000.0 50115 AND ODOM THE CONTRACTOR 914E BE SOLES 1 / PA'a BUILDING TO REMAIN o as.or O[MD IN52 Men SEER CONSTRIETCN ENE REECE o \. '� i• e 0E10D[5.500600 AND 1.211005 N0 FOR Cm0EN5e5 NI MEM VERIZON REP. DATE: �y. / j' -, a ra m52r SEDER CONTRACT. MINNnon/0014x1 GM O ER \p %• i• zRmIC aTRII511Eb COMA.CERWTT[RS. 21 ODER Al NAMENANE Am 057116201 NANa15 010 SPNQ PARIS TO 101 SE ME Ai 1>.Al MARINO 010.DTNNAN9�41Pov0[D EON THE COERCESHAT R4 MATTITUCK f{�'.`/• RAMME.0714 .j 'VP SEWER,TENTPUT00.OR ENORou E0 P OFFDQDEB7�(01 ENT 1 W5002REE `1•%.5,- / 6'‘ ' M1 ECM[00151E OOR REOTOCO WN.TIE n11.• NGWRW10E PERM 552)1 DI MENET BC COCRE515.NW 50 TO THE Wi $110 OWN i 5. W Ems�� A A,1aE ,as tea. NY33X,C588/958283 wTKI WEE THE COURSE a THE.SEK INE 5w1WCIN Sala 4080015 / 1�} % al[NSW ME N OTHER 810.001E YI3KVIE5 Swl¢[WIN N fii4tt ALD ‹.- %' BULK REQUIREMENTS NH SAO GWRNTOR15)ETCH iWi WE YaRRAN1E5 ARE RWTANED. 9a AwI¢s / 2R 10GR.0m NNK-M NI I>IX9GROMVO MUMS $1RUCINQ0IHA 01151 ELIJAH'S LANE & RT 25 ZOARG 95155(1:LB-NOTED BUSKS 150 Or A NOTWORM 56.0.E PRN 10 air01)W16N.MDC NAND OE 1 SOUTHOLD, NY 4..;:„N %. • / \\1. PERMITTEDOR MIS OF NSW TEES AND/OD 51521[111[5. g�\.. •moo / M1,A `off MI UI 809 i.Sta.108.OR 101) � D cosmic PROPOSED zR Las SE a PUSa swu NOT s ISM FOR mrmRWla 521E rt 525 KEN 10- OEM AS 50 �"m U 5040 DIST. 1000 SEC. 108 \, i• '� NAL LOT AREA(S0.Fl.) 80,000 80.507 NO CH.VCE MCC t[m: \ j. '\ %• WILLIAM J.BAXTER,JR. MIL LOT WIDTH(FEET) 175 1975 NO CHANGE •\ j 1030 EAST PUINAM AVENUE Iml LOT DEPTH(FEET) 250 4742 NO 044 GE ROPO BLOCK 4, LOT 11.3 •,CODON \ j• GREENWICH,CT Ofi8300 315 RACHELS Raw •.\ %.7 Nml FROM YARD(FEET) 100 762 NO wax pA 5 R• 25_E-14P R AIATTRUOC M'15952 %pT, / /' MIL SIX wen,0[/890(FEE1) 20/45 4.6/58.4 NO MINCE (�VCK'GR� \ %' lax RUR TAD(FEET) 75 231 50 014111£ 1,A0 / \ ../ " a SITE PLAN wms<IPE AREA(15) 35 >54 -2.16 /. sNEErTTT�E / \••\ %! ® SCALL I'=20 LOT CORERA;E(0) 20 12b +.6 % %. // j• GRAPHIC SCALE MAL MARC rEI9rt( 35 Mao 110 y • % SITE PLAN AND NOTES . 'r%s /j _ • 0 PETER E. PAPAY - 1e 'ID;\ •j• : ���� LEGEND / `o \ /�i' IDI ) LIGHT ONES DENOTE EXISTING CONDITIONS SHEET NUMBER '\ :/*:0 I[BMSA. 20 B. .,./.s% S HEW uEs DENOTE PROPOSED CONDITIO16 UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR Wl11ARD N GON2AlEZ NEW 80XSUF2 8 NY 11956 -E-POWER URIC ADDITION TO THIS DOCUMENT IS �+ -T-TELEPHONE WIarc (1 \ A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 J •\ - - -EX9TING OVERHEAD UIILRIES OF THE NEW YORK STATE \ -31-EXISTING CONTOUR EDUCATION LAW. Ni.PAOFE590HAL MINCER N0.064690 • N • ( �) NOTE;FM OBSIfdICiIOM MARIQIG DEIERAWAI2N G Q PENDING CONTACT SPRINT FOR FM OBSTRUCTION GTE WMJ G AND mum IIONTORWG REOUEYFNIS, CLSTNC TREE TO BE ROWEDXf7 , ' 340' 0 - ---- _G GPS _ WOAD(CiY1N1(1 YODEL 8501 (TIP FOR 3) FM STROBE ANDNir UNIT m� I1 AS WD BY YICRORECT j y WARKER LIGHTS t�i4� 17 230•VEIEZON AL, •SPIRIT PANEL ANTENYI I MUM DANIEL 10 EOUPIENT SHELTER .--' ©PROVO(ARM(TREATMENT 110_+ (TMP FOD 9.6 SIM) PPE WAD.AEPER / NrrMO t'-0''BEY010*Wm asdPoLtio f1T"'m0i 11P - I I•11 �`CABFS 11 WPict IDD INDEEL O YQIOFIE 8509 AS a I� T RELOCATE(9)AT&T ANIMAS.INSTALL ■ SNAP-64 6i / lVI: ' J'' `S ' UmER(RWNm NATES SPRINT ORIENTATION 96=f r,„ 4{÷,--19"OR120NI)A"'oo pot SN°f�'M' I HANGE� ) 3.IS70.rl.EVE 517911 PPC FLET40, T�' %' 45% ..-•' s% S\ (yyOM) _ TRAPEZE 0,'-o-0/C Io-o?o c)e :DWI FO2TIRE '/!� YCI1• / \S (V True 90'± ,--!-!--I-! AExIEI PANEL ANIUOA � MCROF ECI PIPE LEG NSE • S\ I (aPWax.) ' (TMP FOR 12,8 SHOWN) •��-. AIPPOW CLAW YODEL PAPA;ao NGiN ecROA&C:cN57RuceOn. INc. fiNOPrOVER© \...\7.....„..-'636C1'-',1:.----. /• \SeD'± SEE x0II/18u2 201-904-2020EOUPIENT / 6 MAPLE 347 1-I-'-1 BIIWNDI'TYPE 1070111 1 SNAP-Ii / s 4 3 VUEZON PANEL ANLE,00 CORP ADAPTER YODEL 81717 /�/ \11 ELECTRIC& - (TIP FOR 1Z,8 SHOWN) TO CROWD FING /NI St0`Y GRADE G •y\�1P . X� TELEPHONE AREA 65•* I RELOCATED OMNIPOINIF / / / / ' .'(•�' </\\,(:,•\,/, \ i /• s\ 107 DANTENNA(TSP FOR 3) \\\\.\\.\\ • /•/• Cm S ` 10'BLACK • / \S 127 11Y°NOP'EOLE.SEE NOTES �\ )•• -- --Sn t vv` VERpON ORIENTATION •� ). •// • �,J C• �- ©` ,1•\':•• ` WALNUT. ,E,Wl% i ' �, SPRINT EOUPYEN(I EXISTING NEXTEL EQUIPMENT \\ (. ;I A,/ —_ , 0 `+ l• t .�UNDERGROUND ON CUNDETE • SHELTER(BEYOND) \\ = (:) .• CONCRETE �: NO l• ��� PERS"/CANOPY \ (•y. /j Sprint Spectrum L.P. E%ISHNC OMNIPOINi `♦ �tS, ;o- {, CDyz- EXISTING AT&T EOUIPNEM_ OCABLE \ P, J '/ Crossroads Corporate Center EQUIPMENT ON ,•,` .•,',,'. •t•••L (Ay' •\\ SHELTER(BEYOND) ) ;,, \ •( 'I- j 1 Inlernationol Bwtl. Ste. BOO Phone: 201 512-4700 CONCRETE PAD • �� . ® '(.) /` Mohwoh, New Jersey 07495 \• ;• , ,' EXISTING (>12'x 30'VER120N T-O-LOQ/CWW LWK FFNCE \\•. T-)'. Fox: (201 )512-4713 SERIN(COUPYENT� V /• (EXIST.UNDERGROUNDNONDUIT 4 \� WAREHOUSE COUPYENT SHELTERCPS �(TO MATCH LOSING) \\ [• f: j/ ) ON CONCRETE �• EXISTING OMNIPOINT \ ',•(') • PIERS \\• — SWI( EQUIPMENT ON CONCRETE U�I•• < 7-0'nu OWN-UNc© \� .C;,,..`..�5�...........:..:..: :1"1•E PAD \ T \.----- TOITHIG) FENCE(TO MATCH • I� FMM B ORING R FOR •Nfr s. �• p7,„;�,p�,�1 \\ .. :...:: .. .... •::;•.. MORE...,. �i1.-Po . i` \ �•� • PT'"NG ELECTRIC SOME(YkDUITS TO •:••.:::`::• 1'-0'0 • �' � 4„a-' � TPA BnY a PALE 0 ELEVATION CABLE BRIDGE DETAIL VfE/7ZOlfwireless CABLE BROGE© • p1LL�SNfY- EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELCO ® SCALE:1'=I0' SOLE:NONE 60 HERRICKS ROAD EDP.) .I▪`s_- E,f$ �[,CS v,`�• \\ \ CONDUIT TO UTILITY POLE M(51E6) 294-7OLA, NY 10901 =_'` l'T \ • \ ,\ I. E1.PRO 1. SEE POUE RE BELOW FOR ENTIGPATE°SEOUENLE OF 1.PROVIDE SNAP-IN ADAPTERS MD PIPE LEG \ ]* * MONOPOLE REPLACEMENT EVENTS. SUPPORT CLAMPS AS REQUIRED TO ROUTE PROJECT NUMBER 110'RCP 100 � \ , CABLES TO SPRINT EQUIPMENT. YONOPELF �\ % APPROXMAIE IOCATON 2. SEE REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE MANUFACTURER'S DRAWINGS FOR 123`3 \��� �FREPLACEMENT MONOPOLE FOUNDATION DRAWINGS MD DETAILS DRAWN BY •\ ✓ �R UNDERGROUND SPLICE 1 2 I DIME 0 5'0/C `�, • BOX BY BELL ATUNTE J.D.P •EXISTING 100 MONOPOLE \ ` ('� /'--- • �� POW6 PRESSURE DER DENSE GRADED AC(REGATE. CHECKED BY TO BE REuOVED • O L/ �(/' MATCH CaSTWm ,� (� OF NEIN SURFACE TREATMENT P.E.P. PRO&OE NEW CABLE ENTRY PORT O O / _EXISTING 6'HIGH CHAIN LINK MONOPOLE REPLACEMENT SEQUENCE OF EVENTS No DATE ISSUE YON BON ODEL BI150E5 OF WALL MCROFIECI �18 \ O ------.•/' FENCE W/1 OF BARBED WIRE ”%��/��/�wi �T+-Y!=____4 ____ ______•� 6' 0 07/12/00 APPROVAL NE1 C-R /' 1. MEET WITH EACH CARRIER ON SITE TO DISCUSS CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. ���..�.-! ���----2. --���j�. •\• ♦E1•..uf-NA �• 2 INSTALL NEW MONOPOLE FOUNDATION,REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE,ANTENNA MOUNTS,GROUNDING FP IMI810NC FIFER FABRIC.YRM1 500x \ E ® E%ISTNG WHO( ACCESSORIES AND FM LIGHTING. SMILAX OR APPROVED EQUAL /' PINE(TMP.) 3. INSTALL AND GROUND NEW ANTENNAS FOR ALL CARRIERS ON REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE. -----•/ EXISTING RED NEW ANTENNAS SHALL BE IDENTICAL TO THE EXISTING ANTENNAS(EXCEPT NEXTEL).MATCH EXISTING *SURFACE TREATMENT DETAIL •\® /• CEDAR(TMP) AZIMUTHS AND DOWNIILT ANGLES.NEXTEL ANTENNAS SHALL BE REPLACED AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. SCALE:NONE • . • 4. INSTALL NEW AND EXTENDED CABLE SUPPORT BRIDGES. NOTES: 5. INSTALL AND GROUND NEW CABLES FOR ALL CARRIERS AND ANTENNAS. 1. PROVIDE SURFACE TREATMENT WITHIN ENTIRE FENCED COMPOUND PLAN NEW CABLES SHALL BE IDENTICAL TO THE EXISTING CABLES FOR MAKE AND SIZE. COMPOUND AND 1'-0'BEYOND,ON ALL SIDES 4, SOME:1"=10 6 SWEEP TEST NEW CABLES. 7. COORDINATE CABLE CHANGEOVER WITH EACH CARRIER. GLAIR MEDICS WR 8195 GRAPHIC SCALE EXISTING CEILING AL Y"PEE A"' APPROVALS 8 DISMANTLE AND REMOVE EXISTING CABLES AND ANTENNAS FROM EXISTING MONOPOLE. \ APPLY'PERWQN'8184 SEAMING TAPE IIT S A o PIJBEFOREw4GLEDI 0 9 DISMANTLE AND REMOVE EXISTING MONOPOLE. 2\1 E P PROJECT uANAGER: DATE: (IN FET) � SPPoM REP:. DATE. 1 Lan= w n b I _ VERIZON REP DATE: (l i �.; PRC OE WAVEQKIE BOOT& FLIER ODIC.WRAF!500X I COORDEMTE 7ERYNATON 0.0.96(ITP.) OR APPROVED EOIIN, sit, n POINTOF ANIMA '.1' PROM(SEALING CWS AlUNUSED MIT NNE: L(�) CABLES WD"AT&T&' — (,W-) MATTITUCK suRrACE © MATCH COSTING SURFACE REAM TREATMENT N OTHER AREAS . 11 L/e111911`(TYP BOTH SEPORT S) SR YE n A mrcTED T( -TTP5 8'OQ ACCESS i2'-0"®GTE TRACER T PROVO(FRNIED OPENING N WALL NY33XC688/958283 958283 FOR DORY PORT OR CORE-ORl1 GFRN . -- fart I�.WW-EU&-.W 41i S7 25 CENTER DROP 809& 2 7/6roD.CAIS&CORNER POSTS •.• ••; .��•-i:%/- . e SURFACE TRFAIYENT [RISING WAIL SIR Am1E5S 1,•. ,s OD. IRIARooM soon MERMEt1YlE POSTS 1.90roD. T :.-1 i :: ",.•'BAR.SEE AC.E-3 ELIJAH'S LANE & RT ( /s ) DTP.) .,A:V't •,••� ypo,B,o vPE �I li i.lf l 1. :! i:�1 1E= "P'° BRACE -•- •• •>,‘"•\;,,,,,, _ __ _ SOUTHOLD, NY �= ••E���1_•••` 9I I LI11=III= 1-111 \\%�\\� SELECT Maul? / 3 STRANDS GAOL 4 PORT - ._ TOP EDGE BARBED /- ' BARBE0 RR( �I I� I=1I I=1 I-1 —111E-1 /� f41 — ROM&107: ►i!:�:III :♦ii♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i;:4 Pc♦i'i�i♦i♦i♦iii♦i♦i♦i♦ii I'i♦i♦i♦i♦i \ 7.2._-.„ OP/WAGE PER IPTt IMP ♦♦♦♦♦♦,IIIIIL0,.....•e i0to,44 I 111 ►♦•♦�♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦,Ay Illli��i♦.�.1 2WELmC CABLC I iII II►.... .,♦♦...♦♦..,i ..... f-lll—III=III=1�1-1/. ( DIST. 1000, SEC. 108 ♦♦♦♦,I 1 ox. ♦♦..♦4 .3 ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦ \ 11E11-1111E-111E111YIN COVER nr-11 a fNY."EN ►•.•.•., ,•.•♦•♦•••,,p.•.♦.♦.t' ♦•♦•c•♦•♦•♦•.•♦•♦•♦•.•I I I�p•.•.•.:, y �„� BLOCK 4, LOT 11.3 WRE 114RLo it •�!II I / �lrararilll :ui ' 1. ♦,IZE POST 0 8-0'MAC ♦ AND TENAON&R y, VAM FABRIC TO 101X1 CROIIIO ♦' SELECT GRA1MM BETIIEEN POSTS ♦ilitl!411 MINDY TM GAR \ FM♦' (W.) //, /\ \//.\/.1/2'CAOWM ♦y, BOTTOM EDGE OTICRI Dy/�wSy� to .. �� W SEAVCE W/CABLES SEM(W/PULL-ROPE Me IRE y' ugoBOTfOI"IADN 4RE ,_•....... ....:. caouo CONTEMN SIDE FRONT WAVEGUIDE ENTRY DETAIL n UNDERGROUND UTILITY TRENCH DETAIL9 NEXTEL ANTENNA ELEVATION SCALE:l/2=1'-° 80T0Y'�E PER • o rA°N.STEEL` COMPOUND PLAN, COELEVATION AND DETAILS CON4.FOOTING 8'QA-7W Al GTE ONLY SUE:NUE (12 REWIRED) SCALL 1/I"=1'-0' 1'-0 Tia.O COTTER>E POSTS PETER E. PAPAY --f-- 4 00 0 CONCRETE _ gas MANUFACTURER:ANDREW CORPORATION 1 .-0 ®FENCE & GATE DETAIL 1. PROVIDE 1/4"POLYPROPYLENE PULL ROPE FOR ENTIRE 4. RESTORE ALL SURFACES TO OIDGINAL CONDITION. TELEPHONE RUN. MODEL.SMR-O8-09017-OD 90,it dBd PANEL SCALA: 5. CONDUIT SHALL BE SCHEDULE 80,UI-RESISTANT SHEET NUMBER 2. COORDINATE UTILITY RUN WITH EXISTING UNDERGROUND WHERE EXPOSED TO ATMOSPHERE. HECHT:44.9• 1.ALL FENCING&RELATED ASSEMBLIES UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES.UTILIZE AN INDEPENDENT WIDTH:10.5" ..------4------- SHALL BE GALVANIZED ZINC FINISH UTILITY LOCATING SERVICE DEPTH:5.0' UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR HEGHT:18.0 LBS. (8428 WIRE-ASTM A121,FABRIC-ASTM ADDITION TO THIS DOCUMENT IS A392-84,FRAME WORK-ASTM F669-B1, 3. REMOVE&HAUL OFF-SITE ALL EXCESS SITE SOIL A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 C_ 2 ADHERING TO TABLE II,I-C.) OF THE NEW YORK STATE J EDUCATION LAW. NI.PROFESSORE(MCATEER NO.064890 z/34- PLANNING BOARD MEMBk.nS 1111 OFFO[,t - BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR.- llllON.,� Ce"-, Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Chairman t1�ti y� P.O. Box 1179 �ki\y WILLIAM J.CREMERS p .1-4` H Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L. EDWARDS It ty, t Telephone (631) 765-1938 \ GEORGE RITCHIE LAT R. `; :�G *10 Fax (631) 765-3136 pR r�D(( �t E � I'F'.'` �`y�ol �V 11 Its, `�_�'L', ___�....-" III': - ,11,111 B . N fkil 2 'a ''' O ' PLANNING BOARD OFFICE 1 �� � TOWN OF SOUTHOLD } Z7eC • / 9 , 2000 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Sp/i...)% SppC%/zn- /Requested Action: vi - /oe - • .., ° i�luV• '5 �4 . ., ., _/, - • ' ; a'' 1 Ar,;Jo.W4,a74(., afid-ae 1,%, SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I Unlisted Contact Person: - . 0/ S S/1C R (631) 7 5-1938 A • • Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (X This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. rely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Board of Appeals Building Department Southold Town Board • o oun ' ; - .; - - - NYSDEC - Stony Brook 'Suffol • • - - •- I. • - . . _ rs • or a - - •- - en o _ •• _ • .,:• ; . _ . _ - ', reen.. = • • ' • ' - i _•i. - , : -. e • -ge A 'minis ra • Suffolk County Water Authority *Maps are enclosed for your review rev. 4/94 . -_,PART 1—PROJECT INFORMAN Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a signifi ant effec on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be onsidere• -as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review Provide an: additiona information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will -ot involvi new studies, research or investigation If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate .;nd specif& each instance. NAME OF ACTION LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address, Municipality and County) 415 Elijahs Lane, Mattituck/Cutchogue NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR I BUSINESS TELEPHONE Sprint Spectrum L.P. (201 ) 684-4000 ADDRESS 1 International Blvd. CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE Mahwah _ I NJ 107495 NAME OF OWNER(II different) I BUSINESS TELEPHONE William J. Baxter, Jr. _ and Jane P. Goeller ( 1 ADDRESS 2266 Palmer Avenue Rirch lane CITYIPO STATE ZIP SDE. New Rochelle, New York Greenwich. Connecticut . I NY/CT DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Replace existing 100' monopole with new 110' monopole; replace all existing antennas; aff nine (9) additional wireless telecommunication antennas; and install related equipment cabinets 'at base of pole. Please•Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial IX-lCommercial 044.esidential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farrr OForest DAgriculture ❑Other • 2. Total acreage of project area: 1 .84 acres.(total parcel ) 0.06 acres project ai APPROXIMATE ACREAGE • PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) ' 1 .61 acres 1 .60 acres Forested acres _ acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres ' acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECI_) acres _ acres Water Surface Area acres _ acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres — acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0. 23 acres 0. 24 _ acres Other (Indicate type) acres __ acres 3. What is predominant soil types) on project site? topsoil, course to fine scuds _ a. Soil drainage: Well drained 97% of cite ®Moderately well drained _ 3 % of site °Poorly clraint'rI % of site b If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through .1 of the NY . Land Classification System? N/A acres (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on protect site? °Yes k7No a. What is depth to bedrock? > 42 ' (in feet) 2 ttr 5. Approximate percentage of per >drtroject site with slopes. Mo10° 1 °�o ❑It15o 015% 0 0 'ager otl 6. Is project substantially contiguous to. or contain a building. site, or district, listed on the State or the t` 3tional Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes CliNo 7.-Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes fiallo 8. What is the depth of the water table? 23 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? 15.4Yes ONo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? OYes ftNo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ❑Yes INo According to Identify each species - 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) OYes ®No Describe -- 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreatio area? OYes l No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑Yes 1No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A - a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16 Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name N/A b Size (In acres) _ 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ®Yes ONo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ®Yes ONo ti b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ®Yes ONo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes ®No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ❑Yes INNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastlrs?_ OYes No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 0. 14 acres.(total eq. compour b. Project acreage to be developed: 0.06 acres initially; 0.06 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped ) .99 acres.(based on total parcel size) d. Length of project, in miles N/A (If appropriate) c. if the project is an expansion, indicate peer ent of expansion proposed 43 %, f Number of off-street parking spaces existing 1 , proposed 0 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated j1563i 1/month (upon completion of project)? h If residential. Number and type of housing units. N/A One Family Two Family ,Multiple family Condominium L Initially Ultimately i Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 110 height. 7 width 7 (enr;th(monopole j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 0 ft.( in rear yard) 3 7,4 2. Howamuch natural material r rack, earth, etc ) will he removed fro ite? 65 Nes/cubic yards •3. Will disturbed areas be reel - ❑Yes ONo IXN/A zl. If yes, for what intend.. purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ONo - c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes ONo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0-01 acr. s. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this prom.t? ❑Yes ONo 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 3 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated N/A (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including dem( ition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? OYes ONo 8. Will blasting occur during construction? °Yes ®No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 5± , after protect is complete 0 10 Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ( Yes ONo If yes, explain Existing 100' monopole to be replaced by 110' monopole 12 ' away. Existing antennas to be relocated/replaced to new mono ole. 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes l No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? GYes klNo ^- Explain Remain the same 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ❑Yes &No 16 Will the protect generate solid waste? OYes KINo a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? OYes ONo c. If yes, give name ; locatibn d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? OYes ONo e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? OYes ®No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? _ tons/month b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? °Yes No 19. Will protect routinely produce odors (more than one hour tier day)' OYes ffiNo 20 Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Oyes 6c)No 21. Will project result in an increase in en.'rgy u.u? 0Yes ON() If yes , indicate type(s) Electrical power (approx. 60 KW) 22. If water supply Is from wells, indicate humping capacity N/A gallons/minute 23. Total anticipated water usage per dtiy N/A gallons/day 24. Docs proicct involve Local, Stale or I ederal funding,? OYes Om" If Yes, explain 4 •A 25. Appr•svals Required: Su. mittal 'e ,ate • City, Tasvn, Village Board °Yes ONo City. Town. Village Planning Board ®Yes ONo Site plan -City, Town Zoning Board ®Yes ONo Varianr,e application City, County Health Department °Yes ONo Other Local Agencies °Yes ONo Other Regional Agencies °Yes ONo State Agencies ❑Yes ONo Federal Agencies °Yes ONo C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ®Yes ONo . If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment gizoning variance °special use permit ❑subdivision ®site plan Onewlrevision of master plan °resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? Limited business 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zonin_ ' N/A; site is presently used for telecommunications & commercial 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A 5 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zone- g? N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? glYe' 7 What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a Y, mile radius of proposed act Dn? Limited business, residential and agricultural 8 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a V, mile? ®Yes ONc 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of" .e ,er or water districts? °Yes (XON( 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, educaticn, police fire protection)? °Yes No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ❑Yes ONo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes filNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ON' D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may 1w needed to clarify your proiect. If there are or may be a v advers( impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts arid the measures which you propose to !..itigate o avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information l►rovic rove is t re to the hest of my knowledge. _ Applica ' cros�• �•!n rMf ii D t 0 it le t'f1E of4E�Pr+`P'1� N� Date //f 71;0 CSignature .11 //' Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you arc a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 rA ".4-.1G-22(2,t1F)-2c 617.21 SEUR Appendix A • State Environmental Quality Review • FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine. in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who c:etermine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in envir'mmental analysis In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns sheeting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the dete nination process has'been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project ar action. - Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying bas:,. project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a pc:entially- large impact. The form also identities whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: 0 Part 1 0 Part 2 OPart 3 'Upon review of the information.recorded on this EAF (Parts.1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both-the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined the lead agency that: - O A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which ‘‘ II not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. O B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measurexdescribed in PART 3 have been reeuired, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. • A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Sprint Spectrum L.P. Nene of Lead Agency Don Mueller ` , Director, Site Development, N.E. ype • • e of Respon '� /lice � Agency Title of Responsible Of 'cer ---r7rvaL2Arwa___At. ` /-- � Signature espo sable •(firer in Lr.id Ag„ncy Sign.iture of t reparcr(If different from responsible or ricer Date 1 .,. MICHAEL J.LYNCH Certified N.Y.S. General Real Estate Appraiser#46-1012 QUALIFICATIONS Real estate appraiser since 1981. President of Lynch Appraisal Ltd.,located at 294 New York Avenue,Huntington,New York 11743. Appraised various types of real property on Long Island,New York City and Westchester County including multi-family dwellings, apartment buildings, commercial property,factories, warehouses,R&D buildings,office buildings, large residential estates,residential and commercial subdivisions,boat yards, and special-use properties. Prepared appraisals for use in estates, estate planning,feasibility studies,condemnation proceedings,tax certiorari, and matrimonial matters. Specialized in testimony such as area or use variances for properties. Applications have included proposed wireless antenna sites,fast food establishments, convalescent homes, service stations,multi-family residences, new construction,etc. Recognized as Expert Witness: Nassau County Supreme Court. Town of Huntington Zoning Board of Appeals. Town of Huntington Town Board. Town of Smithtown Board of Zoning Appeals. Town of Smithtown Town Board. Town of Babylon Zoning Board of Appeals. Town of Brookhaven Board of Zoning Appeals. Town of Islip Town Board. Town of Islip Planning Board. Town of Southampton Planning Board. Town of Oyster Bay Zoning Board of Appeals. Town of Oyster Bay Town Board. Town of Hempstead Board of Zoning Appeals. Town of Hempstead Town Board. Town of Shelter Island Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Bayville Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of East Hills Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Garden City Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Great Neck Estates Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Lawrence Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Matinecock Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Mill Neck Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Muttontown Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Old Brookville Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Roslyn Board of Trustees. LYNCH APPRAISAL LTD. Recognized as Expert Witness (cont.): Village of Upper Brookville Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Valley Stream Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Westbury Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Williston Park Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Huntington Bay Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Lindenhurst Zoning Board of Appeals. Village of Northport Board of Zoning Appeals. Village of Quogue Zoning Board of Appeals. EDUCATION Hofstra University,Hempstead,New York: BBA-Management(1983); MBA- Banking &Finance (1991). TECHNICAL TRAINING Appraisal Institute Real Estate Appraisal Principles-Exam#1A-1. Basic Valuation Procedures -Exam#1A-2. Capitalization Theory and Techniques,Part A, -Exam#1B-A. Capitalization Theory and Tech. Part B, - successfully challenged Exam#1B-B. Case Studies in Real Estate Valuation-successfully challenged Exam#2-1. Standards of Professional Practice, Part A(USPAP) -Exam#I410 Standards of Professional Practice, Part B -Exam#11420 LYNCH APPRAISAL LTD. ?,27 '24 2000 3:28 PM FRSPRCE SAFETY 8789248041 9. 12015X844`297 P.02 Slit, 4/111 1 3ACFederal Aviation Administration AERONAUTICAL STUDY EASTERN REGION, AEA-520 No: DO-AEA-2668-0E 1 ,AVI TION PLAZA PRIOR STUDY J,ttM11 CA, N.Y. 11434-4609 _ No: Op-AEA-2666-0g ISSUED DAT13': 07/31/00 ,o, Pallf a AIRSPACE SAFETY ANALYSIS COR131, ill l SPRINT SPECTRUM 1903 PHOENIX BLVD. SUITE 250 ATLANTA, GA 30349 I f •** DETERMINATION Off' NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION ** The Pederal1 .Aviation Administration has completed an aeronautical study under the pkwvisiona of 49 U.S.C. , Section 44718 and. if applicable, Title 14 of the Code of Federal, Regulations, partfna Description: ANTENNA TOWER 1870-1885, 1950-1965 MHZ .2 Kw Location: MATTITUCX NY Latitude: 40-59-57.90 NAD 83 Longitude: 072-30-39.20 Heights: lie feet above 148 feet above mean seaound level Alevevel lAMSL ) This aeronautical study revealed that the structure does not exceed provideditthesfa owingaconditioon d s)ct oe ndihazard tion(s) , is fare)imetavlgatiors Based on trLs evaluation, marking and lighting are not necessary for aviation safety. However, if marking and/er lighting are accomplished on a voluntary basis, ,we recommend it be installed and maintained .in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1K. This deter:riination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates, heights, fre9uency(ies) and power. Arty changes in coordinates, heights, trequency(ie&) or use of greater power will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including increase in heights, power, or the addition of other transmitters, requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derricks, etc. , which may be used during actual construction of the structure. However, this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as :indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the FAA. This deter urination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient Use of navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of �c£mpli'compliance responsibilities relating to rhea y law, ordinance, or regulation o any ody. A copy of his determination will be forwarded to the Federal Communications .t 0L/SO '; SLS"ON 6c=91, 00, LO/LL 470 04747291.02 02113W AI0A M3N . 'C7 2�4 2000 3125 PM FR PACE SAFETY 678924804141109, 1201E844287 P.03 Commission if the structure is subject to their licensing authority. ;f we can be of further assietarsce, please contact our office at 718,5%3-4546 . On any future correspondence concerning this matter, Pleas.* refer to Aeronautical Study N*Ilbey Oil-AEA-2668-0E. (46444-CraloPs".414.•.: Robert P. Ar Xaaer (ONE) specialist, AIRSPACE BRANCH • "" a n7w- " 0 L/90 SLS'ON Lei:9 L 00. L0/L L 4i001i'i99 L0Z 0J13W TOA M3N `, �.'.� , Please Type or Print on This Form , i Form Approved ante No.2120-0001 Failure To Provide All Requested Information May Delay Processing of Your Notice FOR FAA USE ONLY Aeronaudel study Number u•s•oewrnmenrorrrermoorwnon Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration Federal Av18Uon Adminknmdan 1.Sponsor(person,company,etc. proposing this action): g•Latitude: 40 d SA ' 57 - 90 ^° Attn. of:Valerie Moore Site #NY33XC688 _ - o 1o.Longitude: Name: Sprint Spectrum, LP. 072 30 r 9. 20 address:Crossroads Corporate Center _ 11.Datum: NAD 83 0 NAD 27 0 Other tinternational Boulevard, Suite 800 NJ 07495 12.Nearest:City: M�l'�ck State: NY city:Mahwah T State: zip; Telephone:(201) 6844292 Fax:(201) 684-4297 13-Nearest Public-use(not private-use)or Military Airport or'Wellport; .11atfituck 2.Sponsor's Representative(if other than#111 Atte.of: Carl F. Stokoe 14.Distance from#13.to Structure: 0. N .R4 M Name: Airspace Safety Analysis Corporation 15.Direction from 013.to Structure: 34 V° True.Beating _ Address: 1903 Phoenix Boulevard., Suite 259 16.Site Elevation(AMSL): 3t1 City- Atlanta state: GA 4:30349 - 17.Total Structure Height(AGL): 118 ft. Telephon4770) 994-1557 Fax:(7701) 994-1637 18.Overall Height(016. + #17.)(AMSC): -Ida ft, 19.Previous FAA Aeronatical Study Number(if applicable): 3.Notice of: ® New Construction 0 Alteration 0 Existing •OE 4.Duration: El Permanent 0 Temporary (_months,_-days) 20.Description of Location:(Attach a USGS 7.5 minute 5.Work Schedule: Beginning After FAA Appn yr l End wheat 1n Mnnths Quadrangle Map with the precise site marked and any cettfied survey.) - The proposed site is located 400' Northwest from the 6.Type: f ) Antenna Tower 0 Crane ❑ Building 0 Power Line intersection of State Route 25 and Elijah: Lane (chart 0 Landfill 0 Water Tank 0 Other attached).The site is located 0.85 NM on a True Bearing of 7.mei-king/Painting and/or Lighting Preferred: 25.60° from the ARP of Matt tuck Airbase. ❑Red Lights and Paint 0 Dual-Red and Medium Intensity White ' ❑white-Medium Intensity 0 Dual-Red and High Intensity White 0 White-High Intensity ®Other OMISSIQp)_ _ _ 8.FCC Antenna Structure Registration Number(If applicable): 21.Complete Description of Proposal: Frequency/Power(kW) This proposed personal communications installation will operate in the 1870.0- 1885.0, 1950.0 1965.0 MHz band with 200.0 Watts ERP. • -4 • Notice is required by 14 Code of Federal Regulations,part 77 pursuant to 49 U.S.C.,Section 44718.Persons who knowingly and willingly violate the notice requirements of part 77 are subject to civil penalty of 41,000 per day until the notice Is received,pursuant to 49 U.S.C.,Section 46301 la). I hereby certify that all of the above statements made by me am true,complete,and correct to the best of my knowledge.In addition,I agree t0 mark and/or light the structure in accordance with established marking&lighting standards necessary. -.bate Typed or Printed Name end Title of Person Filing Notice Signature 07/12/2000 Valerie Moore, RF Engineer nran.- AA A. Afing 01,/01, cLS'ON viii=9L 00. L0/LL 1700471729LO2 0113W )I}JOA M3N OMAR G. DELGADO Mailing Address: E-mail: Permanent Address: P.O. Box M-62 odelgado01@msn.com 24 Central Ave.,Apt.4C Hoboken,NJ 07030 odelga01 @sprintspectrum.com Ridgefield Park,NJ 07660 (201)373-1571 EDUCATION: STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,Hoboken,New Jersey 05/'99 Master of Engineering degree m Electrical Engineering. Concentration: Telecommunications Engineering. GPA:3.75 STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,Hoboken,New Jersey 05/'96 Bachelor of Engineering degree.GPA: 3.278 Major:Electrical Engineering EXPERIENCE: SPRINT PCS,Mahwah,NJ 06/'99—Present RF Engineer:Designed and implemented a CDMA based PCS wireless system in Long Island,NY. Designed physical configurations for antennas and Base Station requirements.Performed propagation analyses usmg Planet software.Collected baseline data for cell site design and optimization.Optimized sites by performing antenna changes,downtilts,as well as cell parameters such as neighbour lists,neighbour priority changes,t-add and t-drop thresholds,search window thresholds,3-and-4 way soft-handoffs,etc.Analyzed traffic statistics and trends to define problem areas,monitor network performance,forecast future traffic demands,and design second carrier, third carrier,and handown regions.Performed isolation studies for site co-location with other wireless operators as well as National Environmental Protection Agency envisions studies to comply with exposure guidelines required by law.Performed and reviewed antenna system sweeps. Performed cell site candidate evaluations.Created coverage maps for town board meetings and various filing forms to comply with local zoning ordinances.Testified in front of town boards as RF expert. OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS INC.,Wayne,NJ 05/'97—05/'99 RF Engineer: Designed and implemented a PCS 1900 GSM wireless system in Long Island,NY. Designed physical configurations for antennas and BTS requirements.Performed propagation analyses using Xcalibur software by TeleworX and measurement integrations to adjust the tool.Collected drive test data for cell site design and optimization.Implemented antenna downtilts and various cell parameters such as handover margins,access thresholds,neighbour lists,etc.,to optimize site performance.Reviewed and analyzed traffic statistics to find site problems and monitor network performance.Reviewed intermodulation studies for frequency planning and assignments.Performed isolation studies for site co-location with other carriers.Determined link budgets and power levels for path balance.Reviewed antenna system sweeps.Performed cell site candidate evaluations.Produced various types of maps for different groups using Mapinfo software Summer 1995 VTEL,C.A.,Caracas,Venezuela ENGINEERING ASSISTANT:Assisted m the design of trunking radio systems for the Police Department of the state of Aragua,Venezuela.Performed propagation studies in the design of a trunking radio system for E.D.C.,Caracas,Venezuela. SKILLS: Experience with MS-DOS,Win 3.1,Win95/98,MS Works,MS Office 95/97,MS Access, AutoCAD,MS Project,TAP,Lotus 123,MicroCap,Planet,Mapinfo,Xcalibur,PlotworX,Paradox, Netexpert,Metrica,AutoPace,RSAT,Collect 2000,TEMS,Autoplex ECP/OMP. Apple Macintosh systems,NeXT workstations, SUN Workstations Programming:M68HC11 Assembly,Turbo Pascal,Turbo Basic,C++ Familiar with spectrum analyzers.Bilingual: English, Spanish HOBBIES: Audio,Video,Sports,Music,Photography Venezuelan Citizen •References furnished upon request � = COUNTY OF SUFFOLK tPr7 ROBERT J GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE STEPHEN M. JONES, A IC P DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ?1 D("cc Np�i December 26, 2000 j - JAN3 200i/k 1!� 4 , � , J '13 • Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A 14-14 to,23 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the following application(s)submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is/are considered to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact(s). A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or a disapproval. Applicant(s) Municipal File Number(s) Baxter(William)/Sprint Spectrum, L.P. 4862 Lav-Cor Agricultural Inc.* 4882 Goodale, Richard W.* 4888SE Caselnova, Ralph& Catherine 4889 **Premises should be encumbered by appropriate developmental restrictions, particularly as set forth by the Z.B.A. Very truly yours, Harold J. Withers Deputy Director of Planning S/s Gerald G. Newman Chief Planner GGN:cc G:\CCHORNY\ZON ING\ZONING\WORKING\LD2000\DEC\SD4862.DEC LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H LEE DENNISON BLDG -4Th FLOOR ■ P 0 BOX 61 00 ■ (5 16) 853-5 190 �l100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY I 1788-0099 TELECOPIER(5 I 6) 853-4044 I SUFF04- O - • y BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD (1- 631) 765-1809 tel. (1-631) 765-9064 fax Pursuant to Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, The Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold, New York, hereby refers the following to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: XX Variance from the Zoning Code, Article III , Section 100-1628 .3 Variance from Determination of Southold Town Building Inspector Special Exception, Article , Section Special Permit Appeal N o : 4862 Applicant: William Baxter/Sprint Spectrum, L.P. Location of Affected Land : 415 Elijah's Lane, Mattituck County Tax Map Item No. : 1000- 108-4-11.3 Within 500 feet of: • Town or Village Boundary Line Body of Water (Bay, Sound or Estuary) XX State or County Road, Parkway, Highway, Thruway Boundary of Existing or Proposed County, State or Federally Owned Land Boundary of Existing or Proposed County, State or Federal Park or other Recreation Area Existing or Proposed Right-of-Way of any Stream or Drainage Channel Owned b: the County or for which the County has established Channel Lines, or Within One Mile of a Nuclear Power Plant Within One Mile of an Airport Comments : Applicant is requesting permission.. to construct proposed wireless telecommunication tower which exceeds the height limited under Section 100-1628.3 within 300 feet Copies of Town file and related documents enclosed for your review. Dated : Dec. 21, 2000 December 20, 2000 Lawrence C. Re, Esq. Munley Meade Nielson & Re 32 Woodbury Road Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Appl. No. 4862 — Sprint Spectrum, L.P. Dear Mr. Re: Please find enclosed a copy of the Zoning Board of Appeals determination rendered at our December 7, 2000 Meeting. We have furnished a copy of this determination to the Planning Board Office and to the Building Department for their file and update. You may wish to contact the Planning Board Office directly at 765- 1938, and later the Building Department at 765-1802 to finalize the remaining steps in the building application process. Wishing you and your staff the best during the Holiday Season. Very truly yours, Linda Kowalski Enclosure Copy of Decision to: Building Department Planning Board E1crNC UTILITY GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 34' PO.('MIP) . 1. 101-1,.a.'A'AD"5 W-Wills ANO 06.72.Ammam-:1 O.CE A AM;N 100 MANE 01x1[01Y01004_ E.1x1ooim.i ax'ER.MWrS 007 SvI 10!0 _ l 5;1KES PA NOT 0100.0-0 NOR 0ROPED.M SOLO 10S10 S 04\10.00. ANTENNA SCHEDULE(ALL CARRIERS) f-c `/ \\...o J / '. If AHA 5 axERAEY AT A 10^ORWY.T y NaGF w VOW W� J / z / RUPW GEEto w_u NOT w n 00VD s Rwawne aunt)MITM S .(S AC aso P•llE.s.0 Ao-S A.1Er,D ira:7,T.ACTe DaA'A1a s9xrais ELEWTNDI ANp OIIANTOT a ANTENNAS rJ%• -.4„ C' A.F Nol Taos:.K-cuaxc 5 m�...,.. CARRIER MEW YODEL MO STATUS 535 ELIC' .ASTON 5. : .s.AAA. / �/v �� REFERENCE SECTORS PER SECTOR S 535 EL'JAI''S LANE rJ / '•may / 9 > Sal PLAN Neosam,mom PRZ kRM 5 TNTAT FT •,MAIMSrmI[Tis MAITTUCK,NY 11952 r-', -� y 'mGRA=:Xl 505100 m Y A w.:zA x005 m SR,:ALD.N-• SPRINT D8980119012EY(PROPOSED) 110'(TOPS) 3 3 340.110,230 GPS NC AT 110' 1 \ / S PRE=•PED B1 M.N.-NW P.O.LrxaRaal M WED Alan u.1599 CURRENTLY THREE ANIMUS EXIST PER Jr ' \ / /_ E A71'T.OHA SONS 001 Ne 01510 AT&T TIRELESS SERVCES ALP 11011-N(0551PC) 98'(CENTERED() 3 4 5O ISO.240 SECTOR FOUR ARE PROPOSED PER SECTOR rJ/•' 2 \ / •0,• �'Y s. .moo1 v,•No s5 Aa:NOT rmros n. EXISTNG NIPS ON EXISTING POLE TO BE .1 J 0- NEYIEI SIN-08-09011-00(PROPOSED) 90'(TOPS) 3 4 JO.150.270 REDUCED WITH PANEL ANTENNAS SHORN It RF •0‘ Jr/ 1 \ yiy F o CTO.TRO-0.0 Num..Yo1s-67EmR CONTROLLED 15;.nGED urxP. PIP rmuREs Nat PROPOSED m OORAIE nom pIS510 MRN BY 051 011ECIoN m PNPAY ENoNECRNRc&COMSTRUCTnn, Inc. 68100 N YREIESS AYP901IE(PROPOSED) 80'(TOPS) 3 4 102.222.342 CPS 1151 AT SHELTER HOOF '0 .2./ ' \- YOfYENT.ME TEAR 1L'_SPRM MIMEO Anti ONE M 100_Mum.ERJPYEM / '� J 100 HLLTOP NMC,RA55LY.NJ 07446 OIDDPOPO EMS RR90-17-OmP(F3DSINC) 65 (Tops) 3 I 30,150.270 MOUNTED itGHi TO PORE IISNG IR-BRACKET (J�: �s so s,R zpl-,,,-:,1, ASSEIIOL(S AND 1B-$ECiOR ASSEYBLEs 4,rJj• , S ' h00ass 0010 a MT 00 t.ACCESS DH CO5P0.1S EMEMS OMI D.I�EnExr.w yc�J�� mSR� au.aost...ANS AARE _ To BE A,% '0 � -- -- - A 001'000 00111 TRESSES 015ETO BE ERx5ED.PNOTED.PI 0050 500:1 MIIR[0065050 ALL IC -_ \ c--.' r/ ' O`�'0N •.\ to Err uL eollAluloN"s*5 rOarzo ON rlIEoil•E CON Docl�s ACCESS. . .._ Ns": J% 9. PRIOR to ME 51511 M Or A Be,RHE 0001000OR SAM,Ana 110E PR01En 91[ yy�� ,, .l• i A'S ,-N. • NO FA FLARZE 005111 YRx NJ.COCOONS 00001100 IXE GENERAL 0361i000W ��p■ ■n t •\ �' '•\ J1 MI NASAl1IrW m ALL'00POS00 051[00(5 AND 0O3NEN1 AAD REM./ 1 1 01501005 m EO9ut 01x1 SNORx 110E[p 10(100 SHILL OA./0005055 N -\ `'rp.% o° \ rAm1l1FA�r 11E05IMMTA 0 m m'NECO50 CT 0050 509% 3' \ ., woRmN �4 B��"ED"��[ R` "D N Sprint Spectrum L.P. / 0 \ J?s\\ ,..)„.(,......) a / 10.050(00(SKIM000(0 AVE Io rs.om,AMA=000100 IgeEss 01 01 F' Nmm 10 001 Crossroadsnte ot00 Corporate Center / ...2.\"7 \ / Cr501CS[0000[51 5 5.001RD 0000 01 00 TE010(10 R 6 5000CRITICALr t0 r510 1 Mahwah, tlOn0l Blvd. Ste. 800 / •\ ./,,,, 00005 5l pY5100 1300010 100 BE MY 001.400 REMR01 0 ME[0110001 MOhwah, New Jersey 07495 / WaM5101 000 0c COMMONS OMAN 100001 35 rot00001 51115 05 Phone: (201) 512-4700 mw /5".: •\9) eO001O 0E FOR 05lT0 wants GURIMAW(POD 1HC COVSiRIC150 YAWDER 110• 4.6' f� •:.�j / Pma m PRI(�5L Rnx CTE mom Fool (201) 512-4713 (r.'-'5 ,PR'c�0 \•. / 11.114 015 0 501 0 1 5X000 OmAS NL 003010106 000 010101001016 IH ,S] / ,' \ / BMOC 0706 STARTING 1005 M 000 RN Wl 000010 0[0X(0 00 WAVED 230 � % SPRINT ORIENTATION m IE CONTRACT DOCWEMz NO-‘9 / O q! ' EXIST UTILITY '\ //// ,).0510(0 ALL EOIII520 0 01101.5 w AC[ORIWCE MN YAVLP/lNRt1IS % 6 OPOLE •./ Ix5'1RIATOxS.WlESS SEEOrIUllr Olx[RR6E ROWED�RREH LOm1 COOLS \w`.........' /% � ..0 - `/170 m RELtAA/ON5 101{0 PRECEDENCE. \ 1>IM CONNACIOR Slue x01 0 CTO 00051 10100 YuuER m Nl 0050/005 W N True \ HUNTER i• y �� 4'S 7� nra 501[0 A5 TINS151'.Teri AH 5m 1000 10 m 0 111 0010 (ODP.) 55 SUNDANCE DRIVE ZOR f}!•P' opp'�'1 INOERE7i0UHD /./ / \. \ COS COD,CT 06807-1809 s�o�` �'` YTEREs ,/,.., ,� / "mxRp" C ; m'",�mSHALL 6 w„ veripn wireless \ Nc1C, SF- �./ 'M1'/ • CM1aAn0a LpNI TEM Au 401Xt5 AND courts MM uL u s,000)00 ES. ! 317 \\ % O.KNS��AP,O`) /�/ / •/ lb 100000*50 t WORS o[¢ III LAMAR ORDERS:omc[ANY 10(0100 5101000 01)0AuTTORM 1ON 1 B[ AD M NEOIn,60 I NYS 1R 901 % IDDT .t1P' • 0615.00 n KLOW WII MTX NL NRXME 14RRC00(AVp STAm aR1SEICT10'1AL \ /• CEFARING P 0- CP-09 � , ^ ,/.�`/ / j/ EXIST LIPA COOTS,MF WIOMAL ULRRC Loo[ASD 10Rm[OxPNT'SPEa10oO55 (Sl6) 294-1090 \ /' ,TU, OP 09 M1' 0 / CESS UNDERGROUND 15 ALL ROM STALL H PERFORMED 0 STRICT AROMA/CT 0110 0(l Cm,FATE ASD 107 ', .B• �,. �� �^' .7"....;-.........42'...:1'.r ./ /�' SPLICE 800 0505050010 ROUREYEMS . • / S�' 00 A/�/ a `• TB 101 0[05 ROL0006C 06050/05 scall BE INSPECTED AM UPRO1CO PROs 10 PROJECT NUMBER /• I 0� / S / 'M1. // CONCEALMENT m SLM 0005 I ���P . ./\ ,, ./. :r, 1239 227 •/• JC' S� M1 / t.,/ 2 12.DODO 1100[OURS[m INE RORER.l0([PROP IL 01511151,ANSEOIO 0010 T • M1" ./ / '9B su1vU[Rs,nEMS.70x0515 ASO 106005 SHALL rW10Al[m amus MX DRAWN BY VERIZON ORIENTATION / ��N�Yq"S \S '' ti /.'' i• '/ °4• <01 MSE HIE 100016 AND PREMSES.TNT CONTRA..SHALL SCRUMS An - /• VY /.r/'A S\ 4 ' '^'� 9. /:/ %,y S/ lb U. CDoapw,[DIE.DIM AmDRma,. l J.D.P % H"=�1 03 �/ / •? i C.1' Ln CTE a9M,01101(01 5.PERroawwx Nro 1x510101115 0:0500(00050 1 CHECKED BY %• IT. JA/ �� S ' 7M1 ?/ �J MMITN THE EOJWERT RW ARE 110 005005SBlm OF OTTERS TIE CONTRACTOR SSS /. V . \ /: ............. o/ �'o P.E.P. SNN1 BE 01560610.0 FOR COORpuu100 101 RORK RN ME ROM m OTHERS 9l AS R WY RUR 10 RENO FOIIPYFM AND OVER PpMOxS m 100 WORN NEIGHLET // I// c ..�\\ '� o^' e o j`/ %• / ;L Po TIDO ARE PERFORLED BY OTHERS NO DATE ISSUE 27 CASE AVENUE / 1 \O� � .. 7 E' A/` . PRE LISTEDPAMATERIALS.All EXTERIOR PENETRATORS SHALL0APPROVAL• 504:;°.'..-''''''''...9...--:>-- • m.00005 00E MIAOW 10 50O'R ENV Mai m 11505 00x05 0100(00 ss 010 BE 0005RED m 900 A0 05ENSAMS W 030rWS 5ual 000FIMT015 5.1 • / `p 00 4 A \ •flNS •/`/ AO BE 0nOm0 AS RARr m 1HC Rp6 .100, / ry \J' pT' N /`/`/ 10 / ' ]I.100 Cprt1K1M 9.1 0 CE PM NECESSARY P000500 i0 PROTECT ALL EASING '5 .COMMA)Agilk `' ` `/ y 00[05 or IRE 110ACT 500E 1015 WAGE Yom By IRE Hu1l0G m WORMS. / 1P�'0 /i/ RAN `- 0� /�` SO J \•\ ,\0�/`%,/ /......./. j• N14S,4 UPM'COMMON EEM SHMINIM%Ms mo NoRmal ALL EH RT RESTORED TO NAmoy ma THE%MORON,THE % OR' 22 NEEP PROJECT01106 ARA[UW IAA HAZARD TRF[000 0(5J1 TM 00115 a 1TH i 3l 0 ROIL.0015E m 2l DEBRIS RUBBISH,EPAPYE50 EE00IFD AVD X01 1(000ED t', O 0 10 00 000 M THE PROPERTY Of THE OMER LEAK PREMISES 0 A F1R51 CUSS •/ ` .LO' Ai 'Cl 0 /• 01[01[MprtW,011 ERN0010 PNM 59015,GIST,OR SWAGES m AM 0511RE. % 7 b0 '% 0 RCPNR 010 PURE 0(L DEUX SmDAms MAI WH BEEN 0.01500 OR OIHERR4 \ %• 00 0 *! ; ,7 5 .3'. . i ,�y QCT• ErRCTED BY 100 ATOM 5011 1101 1.Y BLEND RIM AOUCEM SURFACES •\ i. /: - :Os, - i7 %• S`CF 25 IRE(31150 00 SMALL PBAORI0 Au CUEING 009 PA1010111 A5 REDUR[5 to \ / 0115 ,tom$/' EXISTING 1 STORY SMP' MSS masw tuscea ACCESS FOR DI [1ON•mas 55010 Mrs X100 OR 9IRRS M-Cm 0 7� BLOCK TELECOM i• ALL CNS SHALL BE LOa110D Axe DIRTIED SW1 DMT THE 51601001 RMP, \ % .\10,, : BUDDING TO REMAIN/' 41 m DE 500.1 a Pat 00010005[0. APPROVALS \ / \ ,v j- / •- 24 DD N01 DAME 4500 YW000001RER6 16100 MI5 11.10 CONTRACT DOCU.x15. \ •i 0 05 - _% PROJECT MANAGER DATE: uxtEA moues.Cerro PRIOR APPR00(FROM CONSTADCTON MACER �: rmL suns DEMONS. /: M1 �• EXISTING 1 STORY M1 ...I' 25 00151pm101 SARIS Crum�iiA cM 1R mxiwnW SAIL&50101 \ /• ,� i• SPRINT REP: DATE: ,0 \ ' AGGREGATE TELECOM j 005Pd61MC MD HAVE COMM 1MR COV5TRAION YEA•a.MTO05 0t /• M1o;5 BUILDING TO REAM i' AP T[CH50o05.500005005 AND PRCE00 415 AND FOR CDOR00070G A11 PORTOV5 VERIZON REP- DATE. \ �1�. / ... m THE%OW TINDER COM10ul.051055 aMF0CT 06151015 TEM OT ER 1T %' %. SPECHC nTR'CTNA6=CERN%LERu1 ROW& Ze MRS Pal 00011E 'r AW 551NIST01 RmAmS u0 PARE PHOS To 1H0 Mk CONS RU Ox WWa1. ISATTITUCK 0\� / 2).All 010Ru15 NO RO3lWXLAP P0W0[D LARDER 1005 C011(001 LLL m ' 0e GWRA0105 TO BE FREE 1000 D[0E0T5 roe A PERIOD m WE YEAR 0100 ', A 'M1' M105 50B51W120 CMARLTON.OR LONGER 0 OFFERED BY MOTOR WVLOICIORRS L e\/ 7 ti '0 0R REOARO(15E0HERE MIN TE CONDUCT=WOOS.00 06n(P045 1051 9R MARIE �% �'0 ROOK DODO DMZ PERIOD ERAS�I.1��"�SEXPEM1 NY33XC688/958283 . % 0. ..• 0(L ELS10O ROCS CR ODER BULOSG 0000 11ES SHALL REYNs 0 E11Cn AND 46. i BULK REQUIREMENTS MKT 0u10G IRE COME m ME 0601 INF 105/0100 SHALL 0060101[ (• MM SAID GUARAN100101 5TCH 1101 11A61 101505105 ARE 0UMNNm SIE KICKS: \ %•' zaa4c MKT:LB-/ANTED BUSKS 2e.LOCATE ANO WREN-ON 0(1 IOmRLRW6 NARES AND STRMnuRES MAOmi DI ELIJAH'S LANE & RT 25 USE m A Max 1OG100 500000 0510 i0 AW(0000101 MORA.10x0 00 0 <I\• / ••\y PERMITTED OR ALS m[LSTM Mae PRO/OR 9RICrvRET. g,.\ 'o /. h `O. TOT 11.3 8001 l Sa HOE OST.TEDD RiomED COSTING PROPOSED 509 RHs SET m RAM MOLL NOT a LASED FOR 66100001 uxla L HAt BEEN SDUTHOL , NY ♦ �' % 0075' DERUM AS SWl 0 INC 5SLE BLO M. \.\ /= M1 IAN 001 AREA(S0.Fi.) BD,000 80.507 153 CHANGE 9DIX D EDI: \ ...7. WILLIAM J BAXTER,JR. FOL LOT PDT. DO OOE SHALL COWL'S MnI MR TERM STATE GOOF rtX6E1Rl1LN eoeslPlXTmrA DIST. 1000, SEC. 108 1030 EAST PUTNAM AVENUE �,.101 DEPTH(FEET) 250 4142 NO Dw�E ROPo BLOCK 4, LOT 11.3 FEET) 175 1975 NO CHANGE H .... ' GREENWICH,CT 06830 Q 0DDON 3155 RAL'HELS ROAD N. \ %/ IOC mow YARD(FEEL) 100 76.2 NO CHANGE M 5 R 2<) o�)OM1 MATTRUCK,NY 11952 %p N. / /' 1t s0E Vim,DE/980 KY) 20/45 4.6/59.4 ND DANCE \.` CK� '.•. U .5 i/• TIN.REAR YARD(FEET) 75 231 NO CHANE MP \• % \ ® SCALE:I=20a SITE PLAN LANDSCME AREA(8) 35 >54 -2.16 SHEET TITLE '• ' ' LOT CONDUCE(0) 20 12A s.6 / j i i \ 7. 7 WI RAMC HEIGHT(FEET) 35 100 110 / •y %•' GRAPHIC SCALE SITE PLAN AND NOTES j 'r;B i' 03R Ae la 40 M PETER E. PAPAY i �0 ;\ 7' Dm m m LEGEND .0 ''\ ..5 E!M FEET) --LIGHTLINES DENOTE EXISTING CONDITIONSSNEET NUMBER ~ • /Seto 1 Inch a 20 D. 7--- HILLIARD&GONZALEZ --TEMA L/(5 DENOTE PROPOSED worm „-L�-� P.O.BOX 248 -E_POWER TARING UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR �� NEW SUFFOLK.NY 11956 _T_IELEP10L4 80110 ADDITION TO THIS DOCUMENT IS - \ A VIO(ATION OF SECTION 7209 \ - - -EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES OF THE NEW YORK STATE \ -31-EXISTING CONTOUR EDUCATION LAW. NY.PROFEmONAL ENGINEER N0.064690 fV Ir © 0 .._ (ofproc) I P(ND11 CONTFAA°�NGI SKINucTON T FCR FM F DEcesinu 6 GATEIcrNAR(16 AID rALURE YOWTOHTG REg1EYENIS. ELSI ,SPFNIT 0'S NG 1REE TO BE ROCCOROCCOC�'7 4111111111.1111.11111111111111 AS NM CIINMEL MOOG.B501 (IYP FOR 3) `\ FM STROBE MD we a Ilo' =1 AS LF'0 BF IKROFIECT //��� MARKER LIGHTS [.I.1.i] MAWCUDE CHANNEL TO • 12'X30'VE(ITE / (IRP PANEL ANTENNA Pc, EOUPIENT SHELTER i ' ©FRONDE FAIN SURF CE REATIf10 IIP Ti0_± _ (IYP FDi 9.6$FDeN) PCE FEAR JUPER��AID I-0 BET010 230II11 COMYIL CMLES PPE HEAD WM 8509 AS RELOCATE(9)AT&T ANIMUS.INSTALL �\ / SPRINT ORIENTATION I II IE1F maw PER SECTOR IMANTAN eEANGERS-(7N1'PI • WO EN IECT SPRfIf PPC GIBUrtT Ti; /• /•'T/\\ 0.(saium) UNDERGROIIID OLI ES 9 - ^r''-�-1t'ir 4'MORROMAL SEPARATpN _ TRAPEZE o i-0•o/c (3 1/1•on)0 X _ 10.-Ir o/C AID IKURNG MARE �� 'UNd` J`/ \e' E� 90 E470Et PNET.MEW �mi IOC-Ir 0/F PPE LEG mmEnmE• QCAASS- /' S\ (oDP�) IIB III ow FOR 11.8 5801N) I �, SIPPORr GIMP MOM PAPAY ENwHEER•4&CONSTRUCTION. INC. ;' \S SEE NOTE 11 8142 too tg1IOP Row.RANSEY.NJ 07446 ED IE1CREPT R ER© /• 'r •1`, 6•MAPLE 44 3f7 ,-;-;-1-,-,-; &/aDY TYPE LB(IDFIECT SNAP-N Mt-9N-3628 S• • /'N' S\1 <>tTEIZOR PANEL maim UAP ADAPTER MODEL 81717 + /� ELCIRIC& (TIP FOR 12.8 SMOIN) BOLD TO GROUND Lli EXISTING `- RING • s X+ ,E,,,,,„„,AREA 65't RELOCATED OMNI�OIM �L GRADE / ''\ 107 Q ANTENNA(lYP FOR 3) \�\\�\\& / --1. '' \\�\\� r • c„,.•/�. • f�. S ` IV BLACK / \S 227 VERVON ORIENTATION 404006 LE TEs >*REPLACEMENT - B 1 • /i ���/ L • ©` vi,\ ik, WALNUT /4 • :` • •r ) -�; 40001+9 iJpl'lllt ` yE, ONRCO EO E SWELTER(BEYOND)L EQUIPMENT (• ;I 1 \• `;I� ` `0�, S ANL uteacRout4o oC C SHELTER \\• - (:) . j CONCRETE `. • N(.tC,00 / XV AR ( 1 - l Sprint Spectrum L.P. LASTING OMNIPoIM , "• W' <\;)CABLE �\EQUIPMENT ON ';:., . C' CO EXISTING AT&T EQUIPMENT > 1, ) CrossroadsnteCorporate Center CONCRETE PAD �. * , \\ SHELTER(BEYOND) (TYP.) ,^ �\ . 'L. • /� 1 Iniernotfanol Jersey Ste. 800 • (• /` Mohwoh, New Jersey 07695 +. ® ', EXISTING 1 R'z 30'VERMIN • i Phone: (201) 512-4700 V /� WAREHOUSE CLXIPYENT SIEtTER 3 7'-0.1601 01804 LAME FENCE \ ) )• /+ Fox: (201) 512-4713 s ea Eol/roti EXIST.LAIN CO UNDERGROUND 4 �(TO LATCH EASING) \\ C )• j `t CARIES w CONDUIT GPS \ ( i ON PiE16CONCRETE ® .n1� EXISTING OMNIPOINT �\ - 'C•) • / `•�' (tn#" \\.• EQUIPMENT ON CONCRETE • C J• /� PAD T-0•HIGH cmai-LAat© �� \ FENCE(f0 DUTCH ...,...:zS:.3.::2::::•'?ts:}s:'t:+i::•::::>.•:<xs¢;r;ai,:3:: \ \ \ \ ItlIprPROVIDE P011'ER FOR •\ 1 \ �i\\\i. i` EASING) '\ `406....14 � FAA LKanNc ° ,\Q CPG \\ ELECTRIC SERVICE CONDUITS TO 1 0•/ wireless l_I`R�C LFA SPLICE BOX o UTILITY POLE ELEVATION CABLE BRIDGE DETAIL Ve l CABLE ROI _ `•�s PCSS \ \ \ EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELCO ® SCALE:1•=10' 9SCALE:NOME 50 M NEOLA,I NYS 11501R0/•_ C,F$SC�C, qr�, \\ \ CONDUIT TO UTILITY POLE l'? (516) 294-1090 � flgPRO •\ I. SEE SEQUENCE BELOW FOR ANTICIPATED SEQUENCE OF 1.PROMOS SNAP-IN ADAPTERS AND PIPE LEG \ ‘,/•‘ MONOPOLE REPLACEMENT EVENTS. SUPPORT CLAMPS AS REQUIRED TO ROUTE PROJECT NUMBER 110'REPLACEMENT \\ 0 CABLES TO SPRINT EQUIPMENT. 1239 MONOPOLE �]�1• A TE l� 2- SEE REPLw'.EMENi MGNGPOOU TINMANUFACTURER'S DRAWINGS FOR lV�.3.:.SOF REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE FOUNDATION DRAWINGS AND DETAILS. DRAWN BY `\ ONDERCROIINO SPIKE 1 X 1 SAE 0 5.0/C + BOX BY BELL ATIANTK EXISTING 100'MONOPOLE 2 X 6 PRESSURE TREATED J.D.P. •\ �' LUMBER AT flit PERNETER CENSE GRADED AGGREGATE_ CHECKED BY TO BE REMOVED4AT04�,� OF NEW SURFACE MEADOR x P.E.P. R:oaOE NEW CABLE ENTRY PORI 7 / EXISTING 6'HIGH CHAIN LINK � MONOPOLE REPLACEMENT SEQUENCE OF EVENTS I - No DATE ISSUE , ON BOTH 9DES OF WALL.AICROF ECT FENCE W/I OF BARBED WIRE .�%O��I�/1&.1,•,30.4-�.:4.�i„v Fes' __-6' MODEL 01118 \ 0 NCX�cS' /1 /•�' 1. NEET WITH EACH CARRIER ON SITE TO DISCUSS CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. \ �`j � \\, ,NN.,�\ 0 07/11/00 APPROVAL \ ♦fl�.md-LA0 �F` 2 INSTALL NEW MONOPOLE FOUNDATION,REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE.ANTENNA MOUNTS.GROUNDING r` FNM BIIELLWD FILTER FABRIC.WW1 5002 C °. •EXISTING WHITE ACCESSORIES AND FAA UGHTING. SUBGRADE OR APPROVED EQUAL \ ® ....,•• •.- PINE(TYP.) 3 INSTALL AND GROUND NEW ANTENNAS FOR ALL CARRIERS ON REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE. • �• EXISTING RED NEW ANTENNAS SHALL BE IDENTICAL TO THE EXISTING ANTENNAS(EXCEPT NEXTEL).MATCH EXISTING 4*SURFACE TREATMENT DETAIL \® /• CEDAR MP.) AZIMUTHS AND DOWNTILT ANGLES NEXTEL ANTENNAS SHALL BE REPLACED AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. ,E 1VOxE ;/• 4 INSTALL NEW AND EXTENDED CABLE SUPPORT BRIDGES. NOTES 5. INSTALL ANO GROUND NEMA CABLES FOR ALl CARRIER]AND ANTENNAS 1. PROVIDE SURFACE TREATMENT WITHIN ENTIRE FENCED *COMPOUND PLAN NEW CABLES SHALL BE IDENTICAL TO THE EXISTING CABLES FOR MAKE MD SIZE. COMPOUND AND 1'-0'BEYOND,ON ALL SIDES. SCALE:1•=10' 6. SWEEP TEST NEW CABLES. 7. COORDINATE CABLE CHANGEOVER WITH EACH CARRIER. CLARK OPENINGS EN 8195 GRAPHIC SCALE ALXA M SIC SEALANTAPPROVALS 8. DISMANTLE AND REMOVE EXISTING CABLES AND ANTENNAS FROM EXISTING MONOPOLE. EXISTING CEILING SPRY'PENNON(8184 SEAM TAPE N 0 0 '0 00 '0 "MI 09J " NN:BEFORE WIAVM" PROJECT MANAGER' DATE: MB m 01011W Miliim ENTRY PORI INSTALLATION 1111 IIE MI IIMWRIIIIIMWRIRM 41111111.111M 9 DISMANTLE AND REMOVE EXISTING MONOPOLE. SPRINT REP: DATE. (IN FET) T 1 men a 10 n • VERQON REP: DATE: PROVOS MEOW"BOOT& COORDINATE TERNINATION '• ClL9e)6(T111 FLIER FABRIC NINA 500% POINT OF 6N Nm: OR APPROVED E00N can WITH AT&T '■' PROVE SEALING((TYR))` AT UNUSED MATTITUCK SURFACE © 1 MATCH MING SUREACE MATTE TREATMENT N OTHER AREAS ■l'' IaOtOFLEGT!Walla ENTRY PORT euBED 1 5/8'OA ACCESS 12'-0'®GATE PROHDE SMOG MODEL/8I119(ITP BOTH SIDES) 9/1 (33XCo88/558283 GREE FDA1 O. _ TRACER RAPE PROVOS FRAM OPENING N IML CENTER DROP Roo& 2 7/50.0 CARE&MINER POSTS I Imo.►I-t 0I R VII III 601 t 06-.0 } FOR ENTRY U. OR CORE-d31 1 4•► 1 5 010 NU9ROOY SOCKET NTEINFDLOE POSTS 198bD. ••• •• •• •11;' .•r } _ '1 I RIR/ /� •E• 0 .� .,.. .4 4• f 4 1 SURFACE TREATYEM EASTNc SEE OIG E-7 EL JAN'S LANE & RT 25 MDULE(40 PPE: ) �`P') IE•.•1 •r.•/ ..•11'•.rIF.•rl r 1�: ' Lie fg�_I_ Enter:roti& 1VPICAL BRAM _ \\\\ SOUTHOLD, NY / 3 s1RM0s GNV.4 POINT E�•®� '•;• TOP EDGE BARBED _ // 111= =11= 1=1 I I /\•\i\ 0 SELECT GRANULAR BARBED TRE E► .,�, -,.-.-...........- ...r _ • 1-111=111-11_11E;I - !•�:i�• filit:iiiii•iiiiiftlii, i�: `c�iei�i�i�i�iei�i�i'��' 1��i�ieiei� 2eELwc uaL -i -I / e0°L"t01 TOP INCEPERHERTYP �0.V.. tlii, .0��.0.•.0.0.•.V.i.O.�.V Flt:.i:0?• \ _► ... ,.., •...........� �.�.. �"PK"L) // -III-III=I�-III=1 ( DIST. 1000, SEC. 108 2•d"-11 CL Fxv.1TOVEN ►.�.�.�. •�•••4i�i•.••�•�.�.�.�� �.•.�\........♦ ♦...' \ MIL COYER•..• ••••••.4s�••• ••:0.0000000•• ,I',•00.0: / ILMI-111J1I-111 VIRE F ;•400 �'O. '00.00'•O:i'� O:i:i:i:�'i'O.'00•.i �i'O'.'• TENSION BMus a 14 o/c \/ //. BLOCK 4, LOT 1 1.3 POST O 8'-0'YALE ►..•�..•. •0.•.•••••••••••.•••••••�,__. ...•.••�•�!.4•�•+•.�• •��.� AID TENSION BM y4 \ FABRIC TO 1W01 GRBUD ►4••••••• �••••••••••••.••••�•�•�.• - •�•�.���•�•�.�.�.�•�•�•�- HYPE GAR \ � MEET GRANUMBETWEEN POSTS ►0jI cu %\ rEt1/2'CRow (IIP) \ ( BOTTOM EDGE MUDDED OEiIIL 3•a SCHEDULE 40 INC ELECTRIC / 4•A 50(090E 40 RC TELEPHONE - 1 -;R�!L;;! ... SERVES t/CABLES SEANCE O/RRL-ROPE AND NUE SHEET TITLE .0-..,TN.- A,9a� 16KN LYRE . - GROUNDttXN SIDE FRONT •WAVECUIDE ENTRY DETAIL / Bones 14NQ PER 3 BL STEEL SCALE 1/2•=1'-0• HER -IRP n a DIAGONAL UNDERGROUND UTILITY TRENCH DETAIL NEXTEL ANTENNA ELEVATION COMPOUND PLAN, N GATE ONLY ®(12 MOWED) scut:1/1•='-°• ELEVATION AND DETAILS WALE LA0( T(01-0A'v RIOTING 0'lO h A POSTS '2F-- 4003 CONCRETE MANUFACTURER ANDREW CORPORATION PETER E. PAPAY --0- ®FENCE & GATE DETAIL '11..PROVIDE 1/4'POLYPROPYLENE PULL ROPE FOR ENTIRE 4. RESTORE ALL SURFACES TO ORIGINAL CONDITION. SCALE:NMNE TELEPHONE RUN. MODEL SMR-08-09011-OD 90,11 08tl PANEL 5. CONDUIT SHALL BE SCHEDULE 80.1N-RESISTANT SHEET NUMBER 1IHSS 2. COORDINATE UTILITY RUN WITH EXISTING UNDERGROUND YMERE EXPOSED TO ATMOSPHERE. HEIGHT'44-9• 1.ALL FENCING&RELATED ASSEMBLIES UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES-UTILIZE M INDEPENDENT WIDTH:10.5' S - ���_ SHALL BE GALVANIZED ZINC FINISH UTILITY LOCATING SERVICE- DEPTH:5.0• UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR (RMB WIRE-ASTM A121,FABRIC-ASTM WEIGHT 18.0 LBS ADDITION TO THIS DOCUMENT IS A392-84,FRAME WORK-ASTM F669-81, 3 REMOVE&HAUL OFF-SITE ALL EXCESS SITE SOIL A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 ADHERING TO TABLE II, I-c.) OF THE NEW YORK STATE S- EDUCATION LAW. N.Y.PROFEM481 ENFi4EER N0.064690 10/05/2000 11:19 5164254104 MUNLEYMEAD PAGE 02 6Ao_et.\& r © oci 5 Km October 4,2000 VIA TELECOPIER Ms.Linda Kowalski Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 RE: Application of Sprint Spectrum L.P. Application No. 4862 Premises: 415 Elijah's Lane,Mattituck,NY Dear Ms. Kowalski: This will confirm our telephone conversation with Lucy today. We are attorneys for Sprint Spectrum L.P. On Monday we were notified that the Zoning Board of Appeals was scheduling the captioned application for public hearing for October 19, 2000. Several of our witnesses are unavailable on that date. Consequently, we have requested that the public hearing be heard on the next available date. We were advised by Lucy that the next available date is November 16, 2000, and that the hearing will be scheduled to be heard on that date. Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain Very truly yours, MUNLEY, MEADE,NIELSEN&R$ By: .2a g.ceG? Re Lawrence C. Re LCR:db 10/05/2000 11:19 516425410d MUNLEYMEAD PAGE 02 6AQ1 M 11 OCT 5 2000 October 4, 2000 VIA TELECOPIER Ms. Linda Kowalski Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 RE: Application of Sprint Spectrum L.P. Application No.4862 Premises: 415 Eliiah's Lane,Mattituck,NY Dear Ms. Kowalski: This will confirm our telephone conversation with Lucy today. We are attorneys for Sprint Spectrum L.P. On Monday we were notified that the Zoning Board of Appeals was scheduling the captioned application for public hearing for October 19, 2000. Several of our witnesses are unavailable on that date. Consequently, we have requested that the public hearing be heard on the next available date. We were advised by Lucy that the next available date is November 16, 2000, and that the hearing will be scheduled to be heard on that date. Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain Very truly yours, MUNLEY, MEADE,NIELSEN&RE By: .Law-e.ce G? Re Lawrence C.Re LCR:db 10/05/2000 11:19 516425411 MUNLEYMEAD PAGE 01 b• � MUNLEY,MEADE,NIELSEN&RE ATTORNEYS AT LAW 32 Woodbury Road Huntington,New York 11743 (631)425-4100 Teiecopier (631)425-4104 TELECOPY TO THE FOLLOWING NUMBER: 631-765-1823 NAME: Ms. Linda Kowalski FIRM: Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold RE: Application of Sprint Spectrum L.P. Application No.4862 Premises: 415 Elijah's Lane,Mattituck,NY FROM: NAME: LAWRENCE C.RE DATE: October 5, 2000 MESSAGE: Transmitted is our corrected correspondence regarding the adjournment of the public hearing for the captioned application. TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES: 2 (Including Cover Page) PLEASE NOTE The information contained in this facsimile message is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual named above and others who have been specifically authorized to receive such information. If the recipient is not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,or if any problems occur with transmission,please notify us immediately by telephone at(516)425-4100. Thank you. MUNLEY, MEADE, NIELSEN & RE ATTORNEYS AT LAW REPLY TO:❑ REPLY TO:pi 160 MIDDLE NECK ROAD 32 WOODBURY ROAD GREAT NECK,NEW YORK 11021 HUNTINGTON,NEW YORK 11743 (516) 487-6500 (631) 425-4100 TELECOPIER TELECOPIER (516) 487-6539 E2000 ` C (631) 425-4104 j\cSeptember 5, 2000 VIA UPS Chairman Gerald Goeghinger Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 RE: Sprint Spectrum L.P. Application for Variance Premises: 415 Elijahs Lane, Mattituck,New York Dear Chairman Goeghinger: With respect to the previously filed application captioned above, we enclose herewith seven (7) Construction Drawings. Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain Very truly yours, MUNLEY, MEADE, NIELSEN&RE By: 2aavience C /?e Lawrence C. Re LCR:jm Enclosures I� %OFFO1,.c x ,10 O' ELIZABETH A.NEVILLE �' • Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK H • P.O. Box 1179 v, Southold, New York 11971 REGISTRAR,OF VITAL STATISTICS �, MARRIAGE OFFICER �ifi 1��1Fax (631) 765-6145 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER = �Ql �$ ��� Fax (631) 765-1800 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER ���� �... .410� OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Elizabeth A. Neville DATED: September 7, 2000 RE: Zoning Appeal No. 4862 Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeals No. 4862—William J Baxter, Jr. -Zoning Board of Appeals application for variance. Also included is a cover letter from Munley, Meade,Nielsen &Re, a Building Department Notice of Disapproval, an applicant transactional disclosure form, a SEQR Full Environmental Assessment Form, a ZBA Questionnaire, a copy of the deed, a letter from Atlantic Western Consulting, Inc., an Affidavit of Good Faith Colocation Effort from Atlantic Western Consulting, Inc., Tower site map, PCS Site Agreement, a Site Lease Acknowledgment, an Analysis from Lucent Technologies, an Evaluation for Sprint PCS, two maps of the Mattituck site, a letter of Authorization from William J Baxter, Jr., a topographic survey of property, and six sets of plans MUNLEY, MEADE, NIELSEN & RE ATTORNEYS AT LAW REPLY TO:❑ REPLY TO: 160 MIDDLE NECK ROAD 32 WOODBURY ROAD GREAT NECK,NEW YORK 11021 HUNTINGTON,NEW YORK 11743 (516) 487-6500 (631) 425-4100 TELECOPIER TELECOPIER (516) 487-6539 (631) 425-4104 August 31,2000 BY HAND Chairman Gerald Goeghinger Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 RE: Sprint Spectrum L.P. Application for Variance Premises: 415 Ehjahs Lane,Mattituck,New York Dear Chairman Goeghinger: With respect to the captioned application,we enclose seven(7)copies of the following: 1. Appeal from Decision of Building Inspector to the Zoning Board of Appeals; 2. Letter of Authorization for Zoning and Testing Purposes; 3. Applicant Transactional Disclosure Form; 4. Full Environmental Assessment Form; 5. ZBA Questionnaire; .'b 6.- Certificate of Occupancy of record issued by the Building Inspector; 7. Current deed; 8. Survey; 9. Site Location Alternative Analysis; 10. Affidavit of Good Faith Colocation Effort; 11. Map referencing all existing Sprint Wireless Communication Facilities, which provide service to areas within the Town of Southold; 12. Lease Agreement; 13. Engineering analysis of the radio emissions; 14. ASAC Report; 15. Propagation map for the proposed wireless telecommunication facility; and 16. Map indicating the "search ring." Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain Very truly yours, MUNLEY,MEADE,NIELSEN&RE By: Zar.+r-ieH,.ce 6. Re Lawrence C.Re LCR:jm Enclosures / . \;i4j I • ted REASONS FOR AREA VARIANCE ONLY" to use be comcee or I a..liCant Do not use these standards for with 'eC natures. ) exception.'' (Also attach sheets if neceaISa7Y. . 1. An •undesirable change will NOT be .produced. in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, if granted BECAUSE: An approved monopole already withta newon ss.tructurally sound monopoleite. The roosal calls s the replacement of the existing monopole , 10 feet greater in height. If the applicant were unable to replace, the existing monopole as requested, a second monopole in the salve vicinity. would have to be erected. iicant CANNOT be achieved ..! t ) e 2. The benefit sought by theapplicant to pursue,. other than an. a»ea_ method, feasible far the applicant 1 i cant's• service ,gap in, the variance BECAUSE: In order to licanteliminamust te heste. ablish an antenna facility at a Mattituck-Cutchogue� area, the app height above ground level determined by its search daofregeafencysuengineers. .gThere are no other existing structures w7thitbe The amount of relief requested is not substantial oBECA monopole 3. . . the applicant seeks to replace the existing monopole. ' 10 feet greater in height.. 4 . The variance will NOT .have an adverse fect or neighb4rhaod�or district t on the physical or environmental condi the �FCC. BECAUSE the antennas in `'greate�nvWsualoimpact onerate thin the.. surroun�ing�area because The monopole will have nog of it design. ., 4 - ' 5. Has the alleged difficulty been self--created?,, . ( ) Yes. ( X ) No. 6 . This is the minimum rto�ooCsthecwha•racterand faGhe�nei.ghbarhoadthe und same time preserve and >? the health, • safety and welfare of. the community. , lica- 7. The applicant is a public utility for zoning opurpo1reliab The i star to p is tion is necessary in order for the applicant tovpre .q,.liab hat goal . licensed coverage area and, is STATIC OF NEW -YORK) / iv . COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) B' ''�/ L d/,,,. .. Applicant) ' Agent must attach written consent from owner. Don Mueller, Director, Site Development, N.E.; d o f ,__If . • , moo 00 \. . Sworn to before me this I J ( �lilt e Notate� Put' c • CATHeiliNE HOSKINa Notary PublNo 5400 ew JerseY p,1y Commission Expires ******************* �ocember30,2004 txtlk/form.var/ten►p ',._ ----r------------ - -- - - -._.. — -- -- L. FROM : FAX NO. : 9732339607 Tun. 27 2000 11:27PM P2 LETTER OP AUTHORIZATION for ZONING and TESTING PURPOSES Municipality_ Town of Southold Nrilliarn J. $astter, T�,, Patricia Baxte_obert A. GtJ1er.Jr. and jare P. Goeller, the Owners of 415 Elijah's Lone, Mattituck, NY 11952 (the "Property"), does hereby appoint SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. ("Sprint")and its employees,agents and contractors, as Owner's agent for the purpose of filing and completing any application necessary for constructing or installing on the Property, such antennas, support structures and related equipment as Sprint may require for its commercial mobile radio system. Owner further agrees that Sprint and its employees, agents and contractors, shall have such access to the Property as Sprint may require for evaluating environmental, radio coverage,and other conditions at,on or below the Property. Sprint shall be responsible for all costs,fees and expenses incurred in securing any approval, or in connection with any testing. Assessor's Parcel Number: District 1000 Section 109 Block 4 Lot 11.3 Property Owner: Authorized Agent: Witt.cr SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. By: / 1 j Name: C-V C I-G( ' .TA-kE4 Title: Authorized Signatory Signed and Sworn to before me this 5 I day of,\ewe,„ 2000 JUNELEME Nay Pak,State of Yak No.` . No.443505 Qualifodin Sullolk N -Public / -47~won`1-kh Qs3(,abp.a QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FIr ING_• WI; YOUR Z.B.A. APPLICATION A. Please disclose the names of the owner(s) and any other individuals +and entities ) having a financial interest in the subject premises aid a description of their interests : (Separate sheet may be attached. ) Jane P. Goeller r..r9-36.1-r 9 . gvc<«c_ B. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market fEr sale or being shown to prospective buyers? { ) Yes { x ) No. (If Yes, please attach copy of "conditions" of sale. ) C. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? { ) Yes (x ) No D. 1. Axe there any areas which contain wetland grasses? No 2 . Are the wetland areas shown on the map submitted with this application? Mot 3 . Is the property bulkheaded between the wetlands area end the upland building area? N/A 4. If your property contains wetlands or pond areas , have • you contacted the Office of the Town Trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? N/..—.A-...... E. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area at proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level.' (If not applicable, state "N.A. " ) F. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences which exist and are not shown on the survey map that you are submitting? Na If none exist, please state "none." G. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? None If yes, please submit a comer . ' of your building permit and map as approved by the Building Department. If none, please state. H. Do youor any co-owner also own other land close to this parcel? r C$ If yes, please explain where or submit copier • of deeds. A i r9c6er .sa <<i ots-- y- r�k ""2 I. I. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel. Public utility (telecommunications)and accessory build-/and proposedeens Public utilitsso gjPsdj,a,�i•ngs • A c Authorized Hi. awl Date . 3/87, 101901k APPLICANT TRANSACTIONAL. I).LSCI,OSURR PORN The Town of Southold 's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: Sprint Spectrum L.P. , by Don Mueller, Director, Site Development, N.E. (Last name, first name, middle initial , unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company . If so, indicate the other person ' s or company ' s name . ) NATURE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply . ) Tax grievance Variance X Change of zone Approval of plat Exemption from plat or official map Other ( If "Other, " name the activity. ) Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest_ "nusiness interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO X If you answered "YES, " complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. • Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself ( the applicant ) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided . The town officer or employee or his or her spouse , sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply ) : A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation ) ; 13) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest In a noncorporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation) ; C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or 1)) the actual applicant . DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submit, ;ed ti . d /4/ -/ 4 2000 ,Signature AlMr /��`'/ C Print name Don Mueller Director, Site Development, N.E Sprint Spectrum L.P. . .1441)-242/87)—7c 617.21 SEQR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who cetermine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in envimnmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the deter nination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project nr action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts. Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying base project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a pc entially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: 0 Part 1 0 Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined i>y the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which NS II not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. - ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a sign,iicant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures,described in PART 3 have been rec_Tired, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.` ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will he prepared. • A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Sprint Spectrum L.P. Name of Lead Agency Don Mueller / A, / Director, Site Development, N.E. Pr'• Yp ' • e of R// Tble( .� n Lead Agency Title of Responsible`l f fie de 7// , ttl� Ems.. 1-1- Signature of Respon Tble Of firer in Lead Age icy Sign.Tture of I'reparer(II different from responsible of ricer) Date 1 _ 11T 1—PROJECT INFORMATI _ _ • Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE. This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a signifi. ant effec on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be onsidere, -as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review Provide an additiona information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3 It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will iot involve new studies, research or investigation If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate rind specify each instance NAME OF ACTION LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address, Municipality and County) 415 Elijahs Lane, Mattituck/Cutchoque NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE Sprint Spectrum L.P. (201 ) 684-4000 ADDRESS 1 International Blvd. CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE Mahwah NJ 07495 NAME OF OWNER(If different) • BUSINESS TELEPHONE William J. Baxter, Jr. and Jane P. Goeller ADDRESS 2266 Palmer Avenue Birch lane CITY/PO STATE ZIP COOE New Rochelle. New York Greenwich, Connecticut . NY/CT DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Replace existing 100' monopole with new 110' monopole; replace all existing antennas; affix nine (9) additional wireless telecommunication antennas; and install related equipment cabinets at base of pole. Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: OUrban Dlndustrial ®Commercial C•.Fesidential (suburban) ORural (non-farm DForest DAgriculture DOther 2. Total acreage of project area: 1 . 84 acres.(total parcel ) 0.06 acres project area APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) • 1 .61 acres 1 .60 acres Forested acres _ acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres ' .__ acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECI_) acres _ acres Water Surface Area acres _ acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres .__ acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0. 23 acres 0. 24 _ acres Other (Indicate type) acres _ acres 3 What is predominant soil type(s) on protect site? topsoil, course to fine sands a Soil drainage. 21Well drained 97% of site MModerately well drained 3 % of site OPoorly drained % of site b If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through .j of the NY Land Classification System? N/A acres (See 1 NY('RR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? OYes iCINo a. What is depth to bedrock? > 42 (in feet) 2 5 Approximate percentage of proposed tett site with slopes KJU-10% 11 _% O10-15% 015% or greater 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the i,,ational Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes M INo 7.-Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes No 8. What is the depth of the water table? 23 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? l2Yes ❑No 10 Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑Yes f2No 11 Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ❑Yes INo According to Identify each species - 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the protect site? (i a-, cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) ❑Yes ®No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreatic-, area? ❑Yes 1 No If yes, explain 14 Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑Yes f No 15. Streams within or contiguous to protect area N/A -- a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16 Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name N/A b Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? IJYes ONo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ®Yes ONo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? f aYes ❑No 18 Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes ®No 19- Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ❑Yes No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wast?_ ❑Yes NNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 0. 14 acres (total eq. compound ) b Project acreage to be developed: 0.06 acres initially; 0.06 acres ultimately c. Protect acreage to remain undeveloped ) .99 acres (based on total parcel size) d Length of project, in miles N/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate per(ent of expansion proposed 43 %, f Number of off-street parking spaces existing 1 , proposed 0 g Maximum vehicular trips generated r 3c 1/month (upon completion of protect)? h If residential Number and type of housing units N/A One Family Two FamiI\. Multiple I .unily Condominium Initially Ultimately r Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 110 - height, 7 width 7 length(monopole) j linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare protect will occupy is? 0 ft ( in rear yard) 3 2. 'How much natural material (i e , r earth, etc ) will be removed from the ? 655/cubic yards - 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ❑Yes ❑No (iXt\i/A a. If yes, for what intend..._ purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? EYes ❑No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ❑No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0-Q1 acres S. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this protE•ct? ❑Yes No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 3 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased. a. Total number of phases anticipated N/A (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demi iition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑Yes ❑No 8 Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes l3No 9. Number of jobs generated. during construction 5± , after protect is complete 0 10 Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11 Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ( Yes ❑No If yes, explain Existing 100 ' monopole to be replaced by 110 ' monopole 12 ' away. Existing antennas to be relocated/replaced to new monopole. 12. Is surface liquidwaste disposal involved? ❑Yes No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes ®No Type 14 Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? GYes &]NO Explain Remain the same 15 Is project or any portion of protect located in a 100 year flood plain? ❑Yes EJNo 16 Will the project generate solid waste? ❑Yes NNo a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑Yes ❑No c. If yes, give name , locatibn d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑Yes ❑No e. If Yes, explain 17 Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑Yes 11 No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years 18 Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes ®No 19 Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour jier day)/ ❑Yes INNo 20 Will protect produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? EYes WNo 21 Will protect result in an increase in energy use? PI Yes ❑No If yes , indicate type(s) Electrical power (approx. 60 KW) 22 If water supply is from wells, Illilicato pumping capac.ity N/A g,illuns/n-iinute 23 Total anticipated water usage per clay N/A gallons/day 24 Does protect involve Local, State or I ederal funding/ ❑Yes NNo If Yes, explain 4 • 25; Approvals required: Submittal Ty Date City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes ❑No City, Town, Village Planning Board ®Yes ONo Site plan -. -City, Town Zoning Board ®Yes ONo Variance application City, County Health Department ❑Yes ONo - Other Local Agencies ❑Yes ONo Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ONo State Agencies ❑Yes ONo Federal Agencies ❑Yes ONo C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ®Yes ONo . If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment Clzoning variance ❑special use permit ❑subdivision ®site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? Limited business 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zonin ' N/A; site is presently used for telecommunications & commercial 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A S. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zone' g? N/A -- C 6 Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? El Ye' ONo 7 What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a i/ mile radius of proposed act on? Limited business, residential and agricultural - 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 1/4 mile? ®Yes ONo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of"9ewer or water districts? ❑Yes ®Nc 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? ❑Yes ®No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ❑Yes ONo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes RlNo a If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ❑N,) D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may hi' needed to clarify your protect. If there arc or may be ar y adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts arid the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them E. Verification I certify that the information providerl )ove o the hest of my knowledge q/c3-1) Applicant/Spo s r"E 44/D-1 Pe-c;," 7 irk o(vvg-c.opervio-r,nt 6 Date C. Signature / / / Title If the action is in the Coastal A ea, ar d you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. '�. 5 r,. Part 2—PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE • Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should he guided by the question Have my responses and determinations beer reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. •_ Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold or magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2 The examples are generally applicable throughout the State anc for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3 • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary Therefore, the examples are illustr:;tive anc have been offered as guidance They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2 Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential s. -e or the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. It impact will occur but hreshold is lower than example, check column 1 d If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3 e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3 A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3 • 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By IMPACT ON LAND Impact Impact Project Change 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ONO AYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ 01 es ❑No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking arca for 1,000 or more vehicles ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No tons of natural material (i e , rock or soil) per year • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts Addition of 25 'x70 ' to existing Qx ❑ ❑Yes ❑No e•ui .ment area; re.lace 100 ' pole with 110 ' 2 Will there be an cIfect t: - . y ur,,tlue or unusual land (mins found on the site? (i e , cliffs, dunes. geological formation,, etc )1 INO DYES • Specific land forms ❑ ❑ (EYcs ❑No 6 - ,,s1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON WATER Moderate Large Mitigated By 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change _ (Under Articles 15, 24. 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) -. ENO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 4 Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? SENO DYES - Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the-surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? SENO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ( • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not 0 ❑ ❑Yes ❑No have approval to serve proposed (project) action w • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing. any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveyel off the site to facilities which presently �, ❑ ❑ —:Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ ❑Yen ❑No and/or sewer services • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses wlui.h may ❑ ❑ ❑Ye` ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treaiment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts _ ❑ ❑ ❑Ye, 0N C6 Will proposed action .alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? nNO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flowsd ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No '� 7 w - . 2 Srr to Potential Can Im_)act Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • -Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns ❑ 0 ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway ❑ 0 ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts- ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7 Will proposed action affect air quality? ®NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given 0 ❑ ❑Yes ❑No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ 0 ❑Yes ❑No refuse per hour • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs per hour or a ❑ 0 ❑Yes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ 0Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8 Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or enddngered "' species? ENO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes INo list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: El El ❑Yes ❑No 9 Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ®NO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ 01'es ❑No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species • Proposed Action requires the removal of more tli in 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural Lind resources? FIND EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ 0 ❑Yes ❑No land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc ) -� 8 • .JS . . . 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes EINo agricultural land • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes C3 No land management systems (e g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO ®YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617 21, Appendix B ) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from CJ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes. ❑No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts Replacement of existing 100 ' high ® ❑ ❑Yes ❑No monopole with 110 ' high monopole IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- ,t. historic or paleontological importance? NO OYES - - Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially 0 ❑ ❑Yes ❑No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the 0 0 ❑Yes ❑No project site - • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for El ❑ ❑Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that %%mold apply to (.olunui 2 (MNO DYES • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity El 111 ❑Yes ❑No • A mator reduction of an open space important to the community ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 0 N • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No -` 9 2 3 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be ' 14 Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Moderate Large Miticated By ®NO OYES Impact Impact Projec' Change Examples that would apply to column 2 •• Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts ❑ C ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15 Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? &NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use • Other impacts: ❑ C ❑Yes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16 Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? - gNO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON() ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No noise screen • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑Ye ❑No substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc ) iii the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "haiardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ [Dye . ❑No form (i e toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc ) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ ❑Ye. ❑No gas or other flammable liquids • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturhance ❑ ❑ ❑Yc, ONO within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or haiardous waste • Other impacts. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 10 2 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be ' OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 18 Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact Project Change IidNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5% • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 0 N (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) ▪ • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 0 N • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 19 Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? NO `YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2. • 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project hange(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider. • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional concequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to they project relate to this imt),r< t c_ (Continue on attachments) 11 1414-1I (2'87)-9c 617.21 S E Q R • Appendix B S ir:te Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0-'/a '/a-V2 '/z-3 3-5 5+ • A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? No • An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? No • A site or structure listed on the National or State ❑ ❑ S ❑ ❑ Registers of Historic Places? No • State Parks? No ❑ ❑ ❑' ❑ ❑ • The State Forest Preserve? No ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? No ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ natural features? No • National Park Service lands? No ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic ❑ ❑ u ❑ ❑ or Recreational? No • Any transportation corridor of high exposure. such ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? No • A governmentally established or designated interstate ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? No • A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ scenic? No - • Municipal park, or designated open space? No ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • County road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • State? State Route 25 ® in ❑ ❑ ❑ • Local road? Eli j ah' s Lane ® ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Is the visibility of the project scason.il? (i.e., •.creencd by summer foliage, but visible dui ing otlwr seasons) ❑Yes ®No 3. Are any of the resoi,m- es dht•cked in que..tion I used by the public during the time of y( .1r during which the proµ.ct will be visible? Yes 0 N I -.., 1 •w O E..'_:t't:2711_10 1_:4n '-,11-.4.25411J4 I'1u tiLc.:I'll ,- j . n .� , 'l I—_ DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 1 4. From .'ach item checked in question 1. check those which generally desci'be the surrounding environment Within "/. mite ' I mile Essentially undeveloped n Pg Forested n n Agricultural ® n Suburban residential VI n Industrial n rl Commercial n n (urban n n Rivet. Lake, Pond Li n Cliffs, Overlooks in nt n t i t_leston nated Open Space Flat n n Hilly n n Mountainous 0 nr0 Ll Other NOTE. add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within- "/z mile Li Yes ©No 1 miles ❑Yes ElNo '2 miles ❑Yes No '3 miles Dyes EONo ' Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is 400,000 NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work n n n Involved in recreational activities n n n CA Routine travel by residents 50 n n n At a residence () n n n At worksite © n CI r0 n Other n n 0 2 7.• • ••••-•-•-•-•v-•.",.' -,"•-•—••••••••,"77."•"•..--7,,' .,e. '.,, -, -.:,..,„.,.:-...:.,„,•,_:,,,,,,_:,:,,,,:vd„.44,4„ .i.....-,,.....',........,,.-4.,,.•v*•••••,4-,,.,1:, •vticoldi• i_Li...,..t.—:-X.17.:-7ff.....'2.f.,...'__,.- , ...--1•i---- ' . :',..`,':... - ,..t, • •.,.:. ,i10, ..,_ . .• v.,, ; - .t..4.,-,,w.r.,:,,,•,,:.,...•.kif•Amsrt,i.:;,,;•:..r.t,i.vi,,,•• , ,,t,„ ,i.,...,, , , , lt,,,•,;''',-'111"..ie;-,•.--,.., 7*. --.x„."..,q..i,v14,4,,,,;•••••10;,t.e.,.: ..--T.- .,...'•;:i.• •- • , .. , ::, .,. .-••••,•,,,,.X.,,r,•••-•-,%-..,.,...z4i'...4'.T.f•''..., '..'Al 'IS4f,4'.:.V,•,4i'l. ". ,i'ir.-q;,.:', :. 's-, ,- ':,•,Z;"' • '''' 111' l''' I"I'r .''4 fl 0 .;•0:26 :::i'irpJ11niii;eq)t176t.'Olit.:761ilffc;14:,(ci.ir,6is:1,Iilylii1)620 gi,,k ill ,, ,..r,,,,• S,,. \) II ..•, ''!'n' ' .,f.:,,, „1,'',.,'„;,,,,•,•,.:744,,'11'.n, t,LIVri-,•',' 7i,`::,•,:,:;,C*Jilitl,t,"." ••'..•'7,, " 1 ._L________t,.•,•,i.T, .• aoi,istii.t„youit,Ai4ilin otto•iii:0104.- ito•-114*.ktifita„ipi Jii..„;!1.,..,,,f '• ,M:.,1 ?y,1111,6, .Ui.„..11,!,!LAW!!.,11.113L.7. . . ., ' r r.f•‘: , .,f• ' .1,, ''''•••- : •,•,''••••'-::: .••••f,`,=,•;:,-..-:•*-:,---s..,,ft,,,•-,-,•;i,-14:••• !...:-..14 ,,,. r;'?";.,...11,4';1''',. :11./.:,, ',.''-i•',,,I..,:*:::';::'::,- •••••' -,,.,;',..-•, ' •::,., „. •, ':',".•:', ,;-••-•'..,•-,--.';:lW,...,,•••.::,-.3.•••,,,--,:.• ,-• -•>.q ',i•,•1•' ''' -i.n`Y-ii-'• ; ,,..-'- •.A., A -•:.• ,•,,. ,, , .;;•::-•-ki'F- -i', •-''''..?,..t-feie,;',10.. .i-'-'?,:,:',,-:,%.,.•.‘",-1 .,-,,-.,,,.,. - -.-!• .,-.4.•,.r. • •.:• , , . ' ,I •I " ' .•-' ..-) ,.-.,..-•,,‘.1,•.211.1;,,. -:,-;ii,..,0,..,-. "fijar,.44-61-,,,..l''-fecitlinitered'atia,:ctipthihtta6216:5'. :'; ' 1' THLS INCENIttftS..!hod&die:.,- ,',' *(3.tt.,k1 --k-ir•X;;;ItilWt- '''. .:, ..A,.., ..,..4,,, titlittir• .,:ji. 'Prf„:tiabilt.' f"141Titi.a.ri.ue-•:;.- *•-• 4t.., .t• w*. .. *kti"re-,?,',,:7i,,c;101.",:•:;",•`,itr,';','„';',-, -..'•,', ',•!--;•• •.` ' , ,.,f,'''.:31."-Lb.r6gtililf,,0,atilt_dr,orbili,.,..021, .9,,..- • ''.. -I ' '-, '••'' •••• f .' .f.,,t'i-,.,- ',:c•fi.i'-•-•: '•;•;,•i!'•;',,f,te:k4;••1,1-rb.,,T,4,•Fa':,,,,-0,':-.,•, -,... -y., f.,...,,:•,,,, •,;t..;,•,•,,•••,,,, „, ,;., , , , •, .;;••• ‘, •,. • , ••.... ,•• „,,,,, •,1,-•,,-../,.(•••,,ii-il:,•• -,•••3,-..;•4,4,-,i,t+4.,t,-,.;,-0:•6,0 e.,-.,,,,--nys: ,1,:.,;:.,,.,91,;:,,,i.,. '..:,,,:..r,...6',...-•' - i.f' New,Xork 1058...`„;,:!,,•:-:',.‘,3;i,'„, l'(:.•:4-...-:!:::i•Y.,(0?-,If: ,,•?6,?,.4,,4,,p.,,i,•"i.:F.4C.V..„,•,,49.:,1:';,,',.'.i:01''''-4.:-• ,.--,,',", ,J.' - ' , ' - , , ,.• z. , , , . ' - ', '-'„ ;,. ';:.:':,- ;7,';:‘,:,1;.,,,,-*•:.,,-:,:.,-,',:;'•',:,,,',.',2',,,k.,14',.1.1t,-F,,r7pVii 0.,:,;,f..,',Vi..hff ,.it,',4,;,..',..'-. '. .„ •••.•-.•.,'.... , ,,,,' ,. -, ...•,,,..,-, '..,-..kh.i•,..•,,t,,At:.,,,p..;.'t.v.-.c,,-..., •e.,,,':.i f‘h 1 '''-'-'•;!-'1`''.•• ' "' ,'.,; '. .'' 1, :' ' '' ., ' :,••„ '''' ,",'-c,,,-,;',1:':•;:, :'•'. ',.,-:.„i'';',';••!,,:l.,..-.:: ,",?.'jt..''''Ar«,-.-,,,,t'; 114 ., ,fi•::4„,,,,,,..:;',,,i,,,,,;!,••f-,,iti.;, ,`.,'• •• ,„•,,•i'...;:.• -,' , ,- „ ', , ,: , :, ' -,„•,,, :,,„y,f,,-;,:%,,'.1';','E ';',, .-e,-;:l'•;',.'..TV,g?.--4';''''.-_,:-..!:,,,,,'• ' ',''''';'•••-, ',!. ''; .. .1,,,,,:. ,, :, . ...,- . .. ',:,,' :', _...;,..,:if:',' -,„•-•, :',,,i....:,-;;';',i'AFf9i, ...,4,,L4,1*4,'',1_,V•:,.... .,-iv,...,'„{,k,T,,':',• !...;•4.1i, .,. ..'. ,; ;.,,,,',.',1., ,'•.' ,,..' ., . ' ' •, • '..:',-,,,.:,.'•,,::,' ,-,•,_,'.'..•,.';'!;;;4'lk,‘•••i*P‘i,';1,4'•,".• 10.`..,%:....P,01-‘ 1;;‘.., ;5,'-''.s.,,.. , )'it: '''t'',;• '''' •• .,- 'j':,.. '', ,,'.',,'-,i':•,:',,,,N't.,•,4,11,4,,,r,4014 r - ' .;.;.,., ..--; .. . 4. ' ' - ' " .1 • 444ti Oki',If: iii •f. : :: : u ; '''lits'it re party of the first part.dit.„ i . •$d„:•-:4.1y_at• ..• .;,_ -_ __ , . .aostitht,ena i At ii0 am ,i aro.,,.nk • i. 'int,"Or•Co, __.'12):11:41 'rules i,3E Pi din13'lit'--' -.--111' .C)a.k•:.",vii liefi.x.--- . tittig-,,,..antv,..1,10 num or t 4 j.,:';.,!.," — •-"' Gre-enwicho 4onne0VidItt4:., :;:.,,:.AVI.i.tfAk.ige4s•w.:..._,,3,.,., .j., ,„;..,.., ,•,,,,,,,,,•; L::::;;,.• :....,,,.....in,,,, • , , ....-.. , .. „ ..,. ,r.,. ,..•-•,:•;,:.:i 2'[...- .,,,,,,,i;*.•,,. .t,?,..ift.sk.•,,, ..4,,,::),,..,,,:?,,Itq_i...,-... ilP:1;',i..,-.-,?;.;,,:,:',.;,,,..,i,'?,:-.,"n' ..[••''',, '..-,,,', -, I - I- ,,, .._.,•,„ ..!.,i...,?,..-'-: ; ,-;•IF.-", ,,,:4;4/..44,9.41/07titv,4,.,-,w,-,,,,,.,,:1,4',,,, ,..1&,.';-.,1',"-t-,-.'dt^,. '.,•••••-''---';',:•'.1.• ,IY -0 , - .:rr,,..• ,,-' • ., , -, ,. ,',-. ;....,....,;.,i ,•,. ,..,...,•..-. .0,, 1,vor..te•or,•,•,s4y-...,,•,e.4,....raw....,-,'1,,',,,,,',P1.,.....C.-i "'':...,)".'..SZ*.!,.", .,i. ,1.- . ';'. ' .1.' *...: 1 , * " *' ' '' "''':**,*"•,''74.*"';4''-t MI. ".t,-,• -4,-,.".', ',,- f,•';''‘.2•17'.,'-',,•••,,"-",,-,:;:-.'.^,,,t••••••..,. ._k•;.'1,1.,,•.....,;:., '' ..:.". * . '....'**'i ',. .1''::'-'4*,';:'..--' :...`f.'',:•'V.,-,*:*,!);1:4'*)`P'*4?-„,41,o, 7....,..pql•A,,,i.4,,44,;%:-. ..--;',,,.,4.---..-,,,... :!,-!-,-..'::!..:;•,. •-'...-,...i.,.., , . ,- -, ":•---- ,.. ..,,,-.:.,,,'...---,,.- 14:,,,,;,,-:,:e,:-,..,,,.,,,.--.J;-.,'q-1,-..„4: -•,,,,-,,,..9Y,.....',:;.,44;1-j....,-..-,•.. ' ,,P.,-.-,...-,,,,..,-, •:-...,7!-• -F• *•-i ••*C '., I ' party•of the second part i . -:- .,,,Q.,..;, .., ,,k.-1,,,-.1%;,,,;.•,• , .f,,..,,,, ,k_.,,, 4ii, ,:,.,,i...,.,,i..,.....,,.... ,,...,t. I ' • -' , ,g *• ' 1 Vartit5Stili'that'the patiy:dfittie fit, 70*. . ,,,„, .,,, 4-JT'.:311 .:1./-.trl..1.•',•- - •-•:. '*,,i',.,.•,.' *,' !' .,-, 'e:rt' ",'4,:',,..Z-,-..2', , •-••v.-.v.ill-?,00,0,,vtyz"..,,11.-1,,tqf.7k4::'.2i,•,,1??,4%,'-:''' .,., ',...t•.,,:t"''',^ ''' 1-.,.A , :: ,1 " ,i,..1. ,'• ;:, I..1 -' :" ;.''•'''''.. 'F**'.'"* ''r;iiiiii '** i. ,44•*i'' :'* .'iI+1?tlft47..*: ..'”•14,;.••:,-.• , ,..9.-1 !-,'• '...• ),::1' - ' '' •* • • ''''.3...iik.,6.•:44,..1,:ag... :-.* ::'"!:'':illI• 1 N.t:;•'' ': ''law fal ItionCY of tilt United Siate;;;I:t1 i,,,',!0vitiiii,!Pii.6„.„' t. ,,,,,,b.,11,14.,*4.611,...;,,,.0..i.,,,,413.,_1.611:1... .P11:.;,,".' •,'..,'•;.-.',„. , ' . I "d'Adil•ft .- .'otimatitaidi,rolei-the;te t$ti,'•,•,, ••-Jii, r•,,,, -, party of t14.SecOn-d:Part,"doe'slitePi.g,4,114'...• •••44......,:e..,'"?..! ,iv, i,•••• .,..,,,,',., ,--!R. .1y ,•, , - by the r- ,,•• : • -.••.• •,-,,,:•• •••••,',.:),',VAI,?',' 1:{•,•?;41: ,,,..1..,,,,,,,,13..4.,, .4,:,,,,,ti..1,,-Pi!,•..,:• •,-,,•;,-.,..,:.;'..' .. ,,,.. ...,- . •.,, -: _ ','' ,1. .. ' , ,••'': L 4. "4"''.44 ‘,.'''',.'.;4''',4 Z:''k;•_kt. '-''',,',:,L.'1-, ,e.4.,Z•'..- 44,,-: , '1,''',.."."..%cr",-,•-;':'' 1-•..f , . • A r *successors and assigns of theprqok-,tti,e.sic,949,., itp, ,7.11.,4r4; ,;, . 2„.• ,4-,,:c:,,,...,,.:,i•..,...,J,..„=-•,,,,„4. • ,,, ; -,,*`•'-',..:',..j.,';,..,,.•:„T;i1rfti,4i ii.g.'s! I'm..:,..:,'; .,''.4.1iti'46.‘•-fr's,1:. sil'iiittitA4,tittti;„;:iti diiek .••;,',, ;',?,:!;.,. ALL that certain.Plot,.pieceit,.,,parce,td, .a ,i,a,...,,,,• ,...,e.4.,• 3,,. ,...,„?..,:•_.•, y,:- ''' ,,,,I,V.,7:,'W'::';-,,..,..•,1,:',.-),.' ,•,•:,,.. :,....•',•'•** ,' ', . , , - ',.; •.','*1"' c,--9,-''•'• 4( 10i 4'• P,..44,10.4Ait '-iti,.ttisiiiiity_tir'.7...'Jl,,,,,.• •,'', i . tying and beingtin'At'.tlitirbittOliVok N.,„. ....,;,.....7,,,,...,,• ,,,•,,,,,t,„..;:...,-,,,,,,,...,,, ....„,.. _.....,,..„„:„..„,„ ,:„.. ,,,,,,,,„::„.•:..,,, - - , ,- - ,,,„••••,. - -----1.," ,:--ititit iict.. .,,..&6, ii.t,zogaid i„,. . • Suffolk tinti••State:'ot;Not4,-i., c.:Ika..,„.._,....- ,,,t,- ...,.„...,,,,,s.,.,_,,,,,,,:<.,t,.,,.,,;,„,:„..,,.,::::„.., .. , _,. .,,,,,a.:„,,:1,,,,61,4 • limit .4,6 „qui,.•s,-?,.... , ).-!•:...', . .. . BEGINNI:NG at v'e:'•:-enno,0..e, 7,..,7 ,w.-,,,-.• •• • ,..;••••,..„••.„..„,:,,"•:".-7.:2,.•:,-:,. ,„,•, , . ., '.. ' 'C''' '; -'''' ';%:-'31fjl'I't7fi'Ali"r'•:Z.,,,Vt,.••••iitift•I" eittaritti4ifig,,tatititott:.;' fAlie.ivitibi 004'.t- . -„#•,..,.,,,....,•.,. ,,..•-„,-,,,,,,...,,,v,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,e, ,,i',•-,.., ,r...,„,. ...•,, ' L Northerly'line- a . . • . -,,,.....,51.0,..... „„,., -,,, ...,.,.-, 4 „,,-4•,,,,,,,.. ,., _.,..„ . . Vi-;'i'RK,v,f ,, , •_,., , i.l.._g..-,::A,-.'„V, fe .--a--.t '•,'V...eaar".'.,I'• -:"..•:,"•,,'.„..,,t,i.. ,.-.- i.5..,,R•0.,.4w-6,_,:,'.,t.0i,•••„l'...t ',4,ie•.,t•ii7,1',....V,.-.`%.,'..-v,.,,P„..'.•.,.''.,:,o i• , 9 , tP1•4v4, ;kL4..:1o.4.,;.,o.0i4...46,--•.1,•V.1,,,-n-,.,:l.D4aI-;-a-'.4:'zi....,c--.,..•;, the same eee00thq; - ilb / ?„ ..1 e „ , ,„ ,IRr1n ”'.:"„.,i....•.•-.,'...-•.,,-,,,,.,.-,.„,:,P,,,,„,,•,,,...i','„ mpmsamii=-------- ,,,, •,... .' ' . .,, ',-. '•• ..i, '7:,•:..••itivim .,••,• #..F.. •-11 ,116.1/1- at.Obb-h -'',''rr'` ' — Road; running' -then-e. al-O.n,„,...i.,,„,•, , ,,.,, „ ,,,, ,,f•t,fr:, , , i..„.., fi.iarat' 4.4.',.,okiti\ elit.toot;i1-„,tio‘,. • - ,,, - ... , Road,.North SP; 5e..,,,...36. , ..0-,i,,,„,-",,d,, •:.,,,,,,t4;,4.).4,,,,,',!,;.r .•,1-4).,•ii.:,,,,-.....,.• ......,,„:•,,J4.,v1 .., ” -,-,1, ••••,:;.4- i,,.,-:i4,4•••'••••••••., 4” , ,,:. :.•.-: •..- , .•. . • , "-;- -'' ii4At,I., •4;';!iltA ifz• tii"00,30,61,..h, -•, - - . in: the g,.ronnti tattd71?01:ng... .;,..' ,F‘.,..., ,- ...:• ,,,,....-..?,•„i••:!:•..1 ,,,:...,••,•:.:.1,,. -.: ,,, ,,,,.,,::,,!.,,,- ,,, , • ,,•-, . , hott .,,difft;:-.•.,,...14i .• • " . .. .. ; Oldrtnicei 'Ttithill,ttfid,le,1154,;,IN . ;,•,.,,.,,,,,• .;:f.T.4.( tr1 i,.ivi..9;•,.1 -;:.:,'",.•.....t.,!.. ;;C:r:•,,•.,••- ::,.... , . ,- , ,. •• ti,••,,•ii.,-,.;ff ;;•6. a,, i•;..i .,,:;:4,,i:s11;14,6‘it,,ti -A?.ii,'0';'..p,'1,,,:47..,,,I. ;'. '.,ii!...,tx, ,t,iii,.. i.,1.,...;,.,:,:...i,l...,..,.',. -...,.....,i,:_•• along fla-4'.-911--*':-.,,,r!. ,• ',...,.,•4.&:Itii...e4,..,.. 4.`,:!-,01,• v ,',-.i"..,,V .,,i2.,-..,..17... ,,-,.'.:.,,,,,ii- •„.';:.„,, .. ..i.„ ''• : —,,• ha' t'-'noit'vdt1:64e4rthet.,". ,:z•'li •- --' °A1W!---, -•-•-••=,-,' -•-fi4,,,..,.• ,:'t -•• •, - .1, • • ' . "Nori;h goo:-_ •;„_ .-..• _ _ :.: ,•,..,:.•h,,,,.,•'_,r",••1,,.4 ..-ak,...,,,,,kril.;t"itAtt',,,,,,,74.4.r.:n.L.:_d.,.ts,:•;,43,•::,•13,j'v•..,:,)-,43,•,!6:',.:.;', ' „ ; •- -•, ,,•• • ,,,,,:‘ c,'.;•.•,f:',,;1fik'ts)•• - ....ixiiittiii••-:• ',,tbittiriT'..61.'3- •''' '' - . ' '. iltitnili "--thenceftEiestit.” 4^•,0,, • .'. ground;• g., . • • -•,4!•••••• 7-,":1, 1,.,••••4I':0",:;'•.4•41.•''A-ergegier' ••'•.:., ' '''''•'.' ''' ' ' ' ' i'..' ' . --.:.,,':-• .•:;•,•::::-•,•;',„,,.43&„,••••' iffi,•.-4.4-'1, ;11,0 ••••,..tidt; ..6.16.2iti . --- it /talpl,- naa. ' '''''. ` ''' t' ..i.' — — '' -- '''''' ''.c. '+' •' Clarence . -• • -.,... :;.,„',-_,;., tzve,:,•51. -•*.„'::,..1111;1;.:•=),If‘,....,.,J4s,; ,.... .,..,....-...,..•,. . • . - -• :.,.,•,,,,. ...„...,,,:,,,....:...i.:•.0,..,...,,,,,,,,. ,... 13,- oit r,forterle,',. ' • , to a concrete inOl*ent.,:a,ett-i.iirtn,. ..v...6', -..7,"V:"Iti.,,.-.•,,v,"--,-,q1.1,4,,;•?..k-fi•-•-,•1•,,,,...I.,,,,.' ..,•.; ,,:.,,.,-, i•,',.:'•• • . , •_ • ' .''' .1:: ' : ; -•;','--::;'''' -':••"•;); :Aiv •Ii`•••,'•,-.--.;“,...titb ..* tong--,:the't.4.-. , :• , j ' , • ''' of .Willidia.Le''otiektog.s,,z , ,,,,..3„.4;,..,-,.',..„,;„,..,.,0,,qhlu-,,,c,114A.V..:,',..--.,•'•.,v'i•'' ; ":••:-.'•',''... ."ir.:. ...•; -. 1tiiiikta...r,,, ittintiktfiai Ottitiltitifid . !. Westerly line Ofi,.„14/1. 0:•41.bl,.L'.;-cii.'46,,,,,, 4,„f:„.,T.:-;•I; 1„1,•'•,,4 ` ,:p,•,•••,iki..,,-::',..'•-,''-;•.'s,•.",-,',''.' '•'-',. ' Ol'' 114i-‘.61- i •ificiiiitStth gab'itlihe ;•,. •, • 1 000 Easb,18 4 -•sfri de ...:. , p.• , ,,,„,,,,.,„„.,„...,.., „ . ,..._,..1,,, , . South 19° 07 ,-, „ ,,,.• .,,..„..,,,,1•,,T.:.•;•f•:"..;,.. c-r., ..e,•!;•:•:. '4,tcb,,,-.;11,'„i;i't,"?..„.,:••••. •-,....,!•,.,, •,..,. , , ' : • . • . •••.',......,-,:,,,,r,•,.... ,...,- .,,,,,, ,,,,,,,.•/,--,,,4,,,•,,-,1, ---,...- - ..: ; ..:.,-, , • • • • ..,:•-',•-• ,,•..,kty„4,-..,--,,4,,,...,.•,,,.•,,,,, is1,o,,,„r4::;•- 1. •: :-.,..,,Pe.,;"•••••••,?i•••••••••s,••,-; . :••-•• -4'1' ,-• : • • ,.•;•.i•-•-•,-i.,•-•,,:.,„?.;-,,,•:'„a0„,97,1-z.:.4 ,. :'.:?•7;;-441,•`;,•,t•••'t,••••t., ,. ,L.'• „ .. . , , .;•:, z..,',;i.`1".•;;;-1.-',.--• ,''.f,q7 ;'...,',' ''k- ':'' '' ' ' ' , • - ".• •',.;,.:-.:-,4a!Al•.c',%.:.44-1.;',,:L,. 14,;,-;.,.!,.,..';:,,, 41.,.,%.2.-,‘,..,;:. .'--.. ':,...-- . .'...,. ,. ,.: - . , ' i , '-• I' •' i,!‘-...'..:;%'.k> ','!,,,,11>. ,1-',,,•..4,'..,,I...-,-,..,••z.t-im•,,,..,,,i.v.41„,1,-.-.. , . i. -•.,- •• -•••..,,., .•-.4,•,,,,-,•••••••%,•14..,•,- • 1•11,:' .•"i'...ji‘l,',.,'i''iftiVi,4*. .,,,.,',i',.,i•?, '••,,,v's' •T-• •",' '••i....,• ,•".`..i..,,t,r<t!,•4.1,. .:•-!. . .: ..;..,,,,.,.,,...-.',,,... ,•• ,., •,,.,,,,, ..,,,,,,. 30„.t,,,,..,..,.5,, .'-,:,.,C. ...`3,..,,..:-•,,I;','4' •414.i,,.,*:'''...*'*4.,'','';.''.,•• 1'1,,M 4•.,-.',..,:::',;*.'•j''..?•,..*:;•;!,." 4. •." I '' • , - ,. . ,;..''' , ...',i''''', •.• ;1 . ,1,fp-. ..:,.!:-!.•••144•,fil•T..i.• . ••....L.- -'• --- • ..: ' •.. .,-- ' •i:,- ., •..,1;•••,--77--Tro, , •. :',,•'.".i.1% . • • .:•,-•-•.,, ,, ..:.. orr„-,,•-_,tr%.„.1.i..1.•,,,mop ,,, ,,, ,,,. .,,, ,,,•,.,. :2 • ,_ , "•' •••••-•-•,•,•••':,--•‘,11,-;',.3. 'v it,t'et.'''t',','-•-uktr'IL-.41,(,,,V: •• . •-,,.., .7 • • , , ' " '', •-•*...: .,'''F,,..;,.."•'''•/‘,i ,.2°.:', 1,i,; !',.. ' "! 44/:,i 'il' ‘,.17..*. 2: . ,,, .. , ... ,.•i,....'''.'..?.', ;;d' ',,>{.. 1..2:Lq 4 , .4, • l ' ' ,. , ' . „. ,,,,,•,.-.4.....,.',V. .i', .!.1;, y i,', .Yis.'<;;,' ' • f"'.. ..1..,. ; -''''A, .• '4,iis' '11'.., 4-• , , -: . •.•,.---- ..,...,v.'‘ala• 0°4 .4.% ,r... ••,trt.,..,,,,,,.*:,,..,1-,-,•*,.• •,•,- -, •-,,• ., : ,, .. • , ,,,., • ..- ,• ,-,,..., ,,,-,,.,.,!:,„,,,,,,,lior..1„. k ti,..:4',.. ..T.::,,i.i,,,y...,;‘,Ajr -,)i','•Y)..,;',",': :v•Ii.', i.- -- --,•-.., •-••••••77- •• ,•.' :,• -'''' •'''•I. :i':•77,717 77771 ..=,-... ., ,.. "•. • ...., •••=,;.:''''' '4:14: }.. 14..,.. ..c.`;..1.• '.''-• , „IN•,;iv7,..,-.,-73,-...•:,, - , . ., ,. •irii.7„;‘,.,,,.. ''.,,-,,,,;;-...,.%.4.:',„.,•,,,-.04-41* •.,,,.-4?-,,,,,•,*'-1,13.•!,•„,... ,.,..51.:'.1-4 l•-•:-,1; ,•itP...1):;,V4.t.4ts.47'...., • '," . : --,-•.-771',7.777.7-7.777,71,,,:f.!&"2:.'t-tilliqr:A'tl'.;;.-"?-'4'.4•4 •::",q-vite.••tit-..,.p',127t,rq''41 r. .;, .! ',•,,:.,:,..;?1,4,;',iltt,...,;,...;-,:`;:..1 . ,,.,,,, ., ......r,,,,4,,,,,,..?, „i.0.....1,,,,,,..,.,-, .:&!6'.•.-:‘'''''.'..1rhat-.....c.•-.:‘'.1, .•:•,'•1:1,..;..,. .'-,...1;'.•• ';',..1).i '', "-',i .".'....'1.C.r.1,7.`'..r•,i..-:•';';'.4.!!'''i ,f- ',.'iii,M..li? ;::"?:'..if,ii 4-IY.''1•1C-.."PlY '''''.1'''' • S :f' .1 iF:i.':”' 'if' ‘,....'• -..: ''•'.''.'''-,..:t.'''.:.0 i..r:':.''t!.i;1,131-'*,.t , .:'14.,$',.4.11!lf.'i,',S•iki?".''.i4.e 1 ij41{11,54.," ';',f'. ; .1.' 'i..'1.-'''''ff' .el'illt itm..,.1.',,,,,-1-41,..-!,'.1/4.*rt.'-'1,:.r"-•-'''''' • • '•r'''-' l'...,-,!'r.... . •.7... ., ,.,, ;s-I. ii..;,,,,,,,tiArtipt-1.7:4;:'i',';',:..,',,'p. v.1,,,-..,•„'.,. ., .,,,'i ., .. -..-ry-E-f-i,..t.- -,..4- "..v..1.0..k..,,.4...:,.,,;-„,„ .,., „,.,.. . ,..., „...,.,. ----.•' i- ••,i:',4-..'114 Pli'-'4'-'1't• '.." "''''''ar' -T'-"',1,-''.;' ""- 'Vt.-1:;;:t-.:--tvt;• ",t-tf t.,;-;",t• ••.z,"1••;fi:j ,i. --.,"----7,---"-;;;Kt.itiip i''..-&''..'",,:ttri ii-0 4.•f.k-fq -1f2:i.101 r.,,i".;ei.""LL--VI 1,1,04;r---,r.,;,'64-t'"".'••:':.i.t.:'re:tc.fi...,-,1: '. ',..:: • .r...', ...',,f..- `"'"'''''''''''''''."'""- ..'014::,4.1,1(\'`.1,flytit• .f , ''tst;,,vg."C -t.1,.1!,' , r.,.'t,!).,...'i,,,,'r..,...1,.?,.. .,,,..... ,!,,,-.+.1,:;.;.*'''',,•- .,,':'..... ',. .., '-''''4/ 17,'''''''-''''''91 .44-r''''111.1'.Vi'''•'4a;1.1;`, %':f, , 7.4ii'... ', t-'...,- :401 t*e .'.'' .74X..'.41../ir;ql,.., ,'i'14‘,0.:/'.‘it'•"k:.'"..,‘4 T... ..,,. .1. ',...;.';-, r' - •-•,' ' , ti*,•' ,..k,_•_ •;'1,*,•,4-,q 01,,S4:-.41 ',PiA..'.3',IP:,?,;z:,,j.r,',:01•17-10.,ip ,•'..g4.--$:, .a,..rwei,!,•:,•14••:•,•fr,f. g.::,t.A.k.t44.10.3,i,•?X•fs4,,-..•••,•-•;4,...et...,?!,•• !:.,••• ••,,,-, :•••,--, ,,,t,.• .,. 0,...-.:4,t,4471., 1.g _,-eo••:;-!,..••,11• -..1.,.,..1.-„,,,,i•I.,,c;t4;t1 ,,,L..t.it f•.. •... •,..:,_3;:itti4414.tv••••,•-•,.,„..re,'ri.r;,,a':.' .t14,1,..s. ;:tp,,,!1!,1',.':!!.f... .-4' '';.,,,!"....,;,:i,,.:.••, ,.4. . .4•ii.4,„ii.,.„:,:::.".1%,.... , ..,,,,..p..‘r.,......r41.,..,.. ,.,1 ,-,'-li.,daq..;"...-•,,,..r,,,,.., • , ,,,,,,,.04.1 It),.,..*.4.- -.,',..1,-,i ...i-,' , ...-r•,..,,,,, ,-....q•. ' , •• . ,. - , • • ,,, ' :'''''i"-"•i'z''."kt..}:'"'""--"'" 541n •‘"•i•i';'4'.01',1!"kvit•fl•Z •••,4;',"1.1.1.-.1' t\4!' ••1,-11.56t "'•'dir.'N$11;',..11;tql •t,4;'',I....P.;••kt,t!...,;,,-..-„I.:,-. ;:i;:.;4,0,,:, •; ,.-„•,.. it i•;.421";[a.' :•;‘•:'''',. .•) ;-.•I''.•••",,!,'-':•,' l:,•:0•1,131320111itE: tft;-1,•?•L4..,•V`•k,V.,,-,x,e-r .7411w.,•1U•T'N,Illy 4.,,,,-.:•'••;.,.,:t•4•;'• ,,,*•-.i.k-•,1443.E.;;,1g7i,Ti.•;'41f.,•:.,••••; ,,,:•,Ai.:•'-',.i".: , ;:,••• ,-:, ,., ,,, -.!.•,4,- t':.:•,s..:••• ,-. VJ,•: '..,:',;;, •:-.',r,c,i LIBEF, .. -..,....-F,--,-,-,....,' ,T.,184-2.-`11,i,,Irl'ift)--1V.4-,,,, ,itliii /.,,tr4,•,1 e fil,•;.(•;.4,,t,,,voitptitr,,y,;,-;,:t•i•''? :;••',...-,-••••••.;:;;1•••,,-•.r.r.;- -,.- .•.. , -i 4 ..“ez,;,-,,,,...ewi.•:, ,•;,ii,•,,•: ,,,,-7-„„•4.`--yt;4;`•.; -,i'Vr4;,t4•Y•ti,-,''''19M;Vi' kkon--?-ck" • 7 ir,-.1"t.1,,•4-"r'''' L'r•I'''V..r":'' g64.. ...':4 i'l'''•"‘,:T4"..-'V•-'''i "-.1.'.;''''' ''''' :fi.;!,'',M1:1..%%;';.''I'i•''''.;,-,..r'41P.''',..1'''':`',.l'At'‘'''?:`,1.''''VYr+f,t'Y'0.4‘3.,,,,'"-VtViifFic.'"ft,114...'. --14 ..-A‘4.•••••:. 51,,,*••411 -,',4-741•1,0•,•'..04,,..t::•.:.4.,•;,,;: .q:b,,.•,-;;:':,,.' •••••••,:-• '..,75;c,-•'.9.,'•,", , .1.:?4.'.''!...!::;.?..•f;,,.4;..V.%%:d.',1;;:`,.in?-l4*,,'.1!:'!:?,fi,"./4.;9;i4.11:14'A'-V1.%;./,;Tiii,r,_.1.3,.,4-"P.,:lrast:litiVI;I rf 417,.l'e, 'J.:1'74'ii',0'1.Wilit;,if.eij.:F,P,•:".'dA.,;fi, ,...-,, 't''`,'V, t; t..,.',0. :.1,4:1!,',,ttiARP.1,1:11;1 ',; (it'aN';'a'.'•iaik:,ii.;1,i1V,'4;7'.".91:*.:I.).11/,'".'' -1419.:(,.;6...,A,et ..,:k.,,,;-:,,,i,v,-,-;•.7,04,V,,,..,55.',"-,i'.•;,;:,•.•,..p.',y;.,,,...il-,, ',,-•:...,H,••• -;iir.,.-•.-.,' •,,,,,•....!5,:t, ..: ,•.-- ,,,,..-,!,-,..,•,.?,- .•-t..,.C..V.,!.....r,,,....,14:T...„0,,,,itip....:.. f,r:ivi,,..i.,,11;;;;,;_l t ,.or ..._ -. tioK ,.V.W.4.1;f.-"..t,'.1."..'::.''.'.-',IDA . 11.1-$11','",T 'I-'....'.'•':1•i•!4-!rt•' .:-..r"•:: 'e..7!, 74,•'i_ . t.:.•:,,:-.,,i,.-cil,,,t.r.',•••.k.i.;•,J,;;;;•%,•.:‘•11.--!:••••••••,--it'Woink,11134,;u14---1,•-, v •'••••''Te,ges, •:--•',- *•••i-V-7= i..0',?,:,,i-i'..,4"' fiFq't,'''','-'-".''''i' '''';'''''''''.'"'' '''''''' _ !.'gii...:"..'.:i,t.IT/1*.:'-jiiiiiiintivliet..t.•......',r...,..,,,,.::,,,,i, g,g,,N.Ipi-1 4i.,...,!:•-;. ". ;'''i ''..,!:;,. 't,!: 1:,..'i,:,y,-,4.„.•14-,;,,P,.,-,„.„i?,,,?•iykr.,-,:_,., i:,.., -!?,:,-,,,..R.,,,,, „. •', ,., ., .,,,....,..,,,,.....:55„--. •••••••,;v:•••••,•:5:••-,',:i.-••••",401;e:;',,,,.v:,r2„-.t.?-k•••:•;,:.•,..,;•••ii:`tifirlity,.,I IN( 1,,,,• is t,ft...f4,.. ,,..., . 1.4,,,,,,,•,..,e,,..,,,I,,, , ,,..,,,,,,..!.,,,,..,,,,A,..,,,..,,,....,..,, .k.,_44,,,,,, ..: ;7'.),... ."•,'•:%%:-• "%il•oC,:ij.; , „!..=,...',, i.i.„.0/kut4)1Elg .:1,,,,,,4,tiv•v4wofWelvik.*i•t'..',k ,..!„,z..::,10:.. . emitikty,!..., ,.,,. ,,,,.,--,•,•, —.,..,...,•••, „,•:,•.:...,,..„..,. ,;,„,."...-.;-•::::,.w.:....„.„-.,•-„Itoita--..,„.w.e.,-,.,r.r.,.....,„N.„.•,„„. ,,„0;i.w.:,,,\,:t 4...4. ,yisitt,.,-• .....,,,e.4. 0..,;(„-,:y...-.,....,,,„:„_. ..,, .„.„:4.4.-., .,....,..„...„..,...4.,•,..,,. •,,,„,/,... ,.,.„..-•; •:„.„. . ,.,.,,..,•,:„..... ,e, , A q' ',pt." ..e.,, •--•••-; . ,tki,%,••• ,.,,,,,Ii:;,,,,,, ,,?,•!...,,,,ytit.-,•....!.•'t: •••••",i,,,,,, .•.:: ••••••••,,....•-••• •••••,k, -;,;., •-,';,.,S•/..S.:•'•'''q.'';':•••;!, ''s=:?e•P'1•1 .,:i."•'•',F. ,,,Y,,, tnen'Itifigiji.),/, ‘3.44V:47,1..4,i.31,11.4te4,.1.'1',a''&•iiiiti!,.. 1-,,tles'';''' i'.3'../',10).,• ' ''i,i;.';; .':`..„r.,I.;,,,,i•C:4:2');i3.1•Ii i—Ettl'AND;;;41,-4,„, - - ,,, 4frit$9,W,kitm!."-.,Wit.,%,.iF;,,,,,iiAtei,,. .zito?.;1;.v,•,:.c„„ . If 4 ''t'r.;'''''..tp, .e...;'''':'').-.% .. •. 141',',:4i;ti' .1,•'-41::t,Lrot: Aiiii-iiciyatifilel0;t9..?,1.. .• 't.,..siii,Itge/:.0.•14.17,':,.`,:rA0.7 4'1:1..',:. ''.4jekiiii‘eilliViliV41,41.?'',4115.1t11::.e.','ir.4.VIt''''''..::::',1',..iNteal...1* :4., ;44,••,.. :T... .t!''A'r„ 'c'.itit '5!•,,/,,::% .,-.t.c.''4.1•P`tybeift.ii.04!'.41PXY,i,fi7'',''''''S t 4:.i;''` i,i',XP'tq't:igY ,ZI:nI.r.','.:.i''..'.4, .i‘t_y''i;.A.1..'''' .4:', ,r.)','''''':X.,-..1.'"';';;0`,...,1"44.4iiAt4iult•Sti,:029 ..!;•..t.i,..,.i. ,41414t4r.k...alf.INIY••.'.1. , ,..,''..4:q.k.. 71.q.;,hi'.i'• '"'il'.."14?;', ',..i..1,..:P.::.•'''';'', .1'T.t.4•:...4';---. '•.,;i,ff, . ,,, ,,,,,;,_ . ""A'i'''•"•''';•",•',,,V4:y4t; •-FA4+: 1,..,.•'::-.1;•,;•,••,;-•;itziqe41.•'f.,i-:,/7;sstit-i-latli;0•Ae..;.4. , ..;:, /I• Atl',11 I.: z ;'•=o,'‘,t,'.t.,;r'',1;r.i'l'•ititlf,,,i1.-- -ir',,e;',ii, '..•";' pl,t'•••:: •••.:, '',',:i‘o,''..'••• i"41',)•'4',J?•,:y.,.- ti•.,,.1, .•-;,. .),,'„,yi.,•,:,,./:',C,L,•-•"---,:,r4.17,:i•tfe•c•102;•••gii'fisi‘U.44/11kVii-'4,4-4'114.1eTV• •4';'•;.i:•';':.6,..f.4;:s-0,1 •irO•i*"411,1:';':4,0',i 0.,,V,4:',',:s.-,-,.. ••••••','-'-'r,'•'-', ' ., ., ..4 ";-!.‘""/".; -','V,:-6''!2t•li 1, .t.tit',.:'-. i ,t;?"0,•"... 4,17. ,k;>tt•L•t-'34-,witr;t5i,,,t,W..44`,44-itkilpiie,-1 1-- ,t''-'t' tttt:;";'9tit-,''',,S:44' ".1t.t ',.?1,ticA'''''.;•'",t1,;".''t.t:.'" f.'t-::-rtit."-,'''"'"",;"';'',';'',:'' ,,- „.,-, l'il.7k'$A,' '-4,'"A` ;?,, it.liAilisilatililikIrttlAr!6.'1141'10:. ta/k -'.''''' '.. 1:41 .‘,., tPiti:":11-'4.1:i:e1,:,•-•••titefftlii;i1.tfi -T4-i:•'':','-ft-'.:, ;.:-,i,j.',t.',:- ti ..,-• t... ...-. ,, --Y.- •It••. ., rrIr.";:.'t'ii'''‘'''',.Lis*.tfit'l i.i.'.1.';''-'4.,.i.t.i'i.,•'';',•';'z.t3,','et.i..14,,,,Vic'ict:,i'4..t.'.-rit,t':'."4',t,.Itki:t.i,ktelic1„;',,,,t."-1)-J4,1,-1?-i_417,, 1.1,k,•,-"Eie.."' ' Ia..' '-t:I.".'ttli:1`4't .."1.11, 44,4'.t,......%''.'-''' '.Lati'-'14:`!"',•."k%-'t " ,"‘1:;:.•;..?" . ', --k7,-;'1,tiv.,,tt4;;Tili,',4;44'1.-4..,,I,,:A,"?...t,,,,tiy4,-It4i,17tivq,1,;411!,.„tr,,t,7f„ivii•d ".•,,:Ittts,,t;%kii,trA1,- •_,i,,'". ".'i,".,.,(1,,p,,,-1::-,4,,,'I..7,,,:',115,!,-.. • if,. ,tv...,.:;:,,,-,-..., :•=2.-:.-f.... .-. -i:.•,i.c,, i • .,:.• :04,• i,,.,'' -•-•.,.‘ ,..... ,...,, ,,ipow,,. lu.1 ...4.111. :-•g-•;',Ift];Ll'All,•.1, .,,;:i.1-4, •-••:::_,..ii.:-.7•134;:i..--..•-••• :•;t ..-,1-,::• • ,' . :-.4,',f!,'N'‘i'i,•',.'''1-',1'.•1'';'14.•:4•,'-',,TCE,%, , , i'c'-,•It9it:rt).•& 4',,l'e.'Ae%;14,19t,••tet!-,i'.'' ,„••1r,„,•Pre)•••.:-TIP. •;4',-0;ii•t-fi i..IM ;4,•ii'•'‘,m2i,••;?= -',c,•-•':!.,:,....:',.:. , .'Y r, ',i,-,..”."..3. • , ...,•;, ,-,;.,,-„, „,:, ..,, f•;,•'i."..s.:'jiri 'f.,'''i•St:iVi'1*..t:''''•ii`;'..14i;P;I:!/./,.°-0:';'--•Zi4- t,',f;'±-.14,i,0444 601:t•'la 400.•".AIM,',.::‘'4`A`i4:411'•.(4,-..;'i. .f .-1-:,,i.h,.?,,-4.'...., ,4; 00*_Opc*ri'- P k.:4,,:t 7, ',-, ..''.1-If•10.1.,M.V..i'.•,,ti•..141cals'iiigg;:/ii.:.1 P.-I.4', : '1,,,',3..?..,••:1',i '.'., ' ., .1.' ,'...,4;c1,::;.,,,,, 44',5.4.r.k AV kt,.: ,,,,1,,TIO1-,,,.. ,' 11,"7,,,:f:4'..'i =-.Y.•LAI#•!'''64',4 •:.-...°'.11'....q.Nw 0. 1.,...-.4-1?:,A74,:q,-,17..:,y. ..„ 4. e.,-..;. .,z.,-.1v,,i,v1.4,',40irl.,§14`1,2•fi-1 ,iy,-• •'..,.'',0gt.3..k4;-:if 4;,:,,2.44•1'.-.5,e,t••rri;,, il,..1,'.4.y•plokiliFf4;'•et,,,,:i ,I.,;•,01,,p-ili.,•;,;:',,,,,..,.,..,,,,I,..!;-i -.),;!..:.;.•,,,,'-,. .•f. ,:t.q,.:',:lt,l''':•;•'•;',' - ..'1'•'•;;Ir:-- -;-x'cli4;;:iiii,'•,,,p,f; i•Ikir.p,',Ntii:P•t,43,14.:13-.-6!).?;Pz, ,,..-qA.' ).,h74,•lik•Ai!,1,',-4-t.'.,5.'.%•;NI,s';',,•. ,:.....••.!•ipt, ',..1-6vAg-qi:,. ::v..„.",.:te, .„,m,..;.0,„,..,.;,,,..i..,,,...:::::,.„, i.,.,,,....,,:e...,„,..ip,,..,,,,.,. ..;,....mk.v......,,,..:y. . , ...:::.:1 "v4„4,;,,,,, ,a4,,r,i i,„..,i,,,.,4.,,,..-,,..:,.,,,,,,,..,,„,;i4,0;:,,c,4,p,..(..,1:611.i.,1,.73triati:,,Itic.,t..,........:,..•,.6,.,.,,,i), „.i.,71.143:i ,.,.0.,,,. ceili'fi.'..";qt-t''.,10,iV,:t,k',', ,,114-....;)'4;'•••Titaiik•-,f,, .r.:,,:,c:, ..4.. -.--,,...:i27,.iii.;,..:;?•-„t.- .--,..,-.:4•.,..4*-4,.?-..!f•,,g4r.:,,,.:,i;,A,:.,_ 7. .1j;c%'f.v4fAi:r 7 7.11'Z'ker,..-413g:VP,AYS.4/..VeljAi.ir ./-'!tp,-.."'4(*til-t!.1',1,,,..'1 g,,,,tt.,:1' .".,""V;;••...4,141,tif-P...,!•Iii;1-?:,...0,41,4VS TIY:.itek-fii;ti,!4.'...;,:,;‘,;;":::-;itTF,..;.;1.•,i,i'li-:',.V.,:';'?,'. -11";•'.',47-.:11,..41.,./t"• 1,%..ilt:1,-;.,. ..k:i.:','.';--''.1••••"-;•, Viiii,VZ te,,,,.,11P1,'4117",figri•iiit.#44Y,4',44`1,1441,141,:gfiktritt): t .. ;;-:-fiti '';' -.:-,!-T:m4iX..rigq$51.4.41,114„,-;."„i.110%Fti.g't.1;11•*,,,g;::: 2rA'..-,0"-' 7-ri-*-1Tr-t.';:1?"11'...T.---t.:*.e.''-.11:-•- !'i--f,..-:21". I --10.;$!;-14",",:•:'i .1141'ii,./l'a4','i014;ti:• tVigt-.'3,L__,._1.-'ir4.':4'al,'" 4044 11':-Trerlfi,A-''P'.1 --':''S.-1 4.1114 ? 7,RHS:14;i1F•i:..k!i;;;:?4.):1 ';',--c5.;-,'"::: :•(.1.': ;-':7*".$7-.'-''''.:'-'1:L'.l'".:i'-'''' ':- .: '-' ' •'''Orl'‘:-,':4'.1-tElY . :,-;$44.1!"'"W441;60,51,,'Ittetriitl-'11-Wq ,!..11-04r--INAIVI PIS.a.t.'10-1",:gtiitP7MA, ':";---..". w'''til it..i'-,•,;,:ti' ..,"rlig,,41.:,,.1(-- ' - • ..4‘I'lkik''''...4A, 74.:i,";T.';'7P•'...'It;•,.:104::"4; tcy.:44+i i)rovw,P,4*.1,42ptcguov,,,,A7,0q;...,‘i,.. ..',1ww,-..,;44.t.,,..,,wi.'..plxk.,,,,,.;ii,,.. .,-i1;,:,,.:.:,::,.,'....,f-...i_. -,,.,,k,z,,,..p:,%,;,,ii,,,..,,,,,,*,,.,,,;,.i 4i,„„,to.ti...,011,,,,,f6;,a,,,,klvidkty02,46,4,444.11.4.:)vi,:•v,. .v.iii-,,:..fiyy,,,o,a-5.0,:1,:i.f,i...,:s,.. .:,......ti'.:::-..•,':.i.. :,:114',..,.,':-.,,i:';'-..t4 a' -=',P1'-',.•.--,,:i'.''Ai,L'OPft.'):-.4.'1..."1. 7).+47? 4.1440.,•44ktr.4Y;1'.1-4,1, 1:::','!,..'?...n.:'''','"g:.---,72:::-.:.;:', ....qi,'.i.i.::::14iiViiisiiii,::,,''''t.4.;.:.:`,Y fii.'4g!'",'A. N 4 -- -,..,..',-'-`:'.7..', .....?:...,`„;:.:-: '..,-,.L44ci.:..-t...14.,p."qq',..cii,i;ey,i,',..$,11.-W.,:oVi..,Y,.'.*Aii14:14,:y?,j.,,,-1.x,)4•10.14,-3'.;§;7•,,ig,,;p.,:t.,..L 4:..,1.0i*,....4. 1,••Egt,i3.„ :..A.r.,. -::,..,:i...',.ik,v-0,4. :. ..i-,-7.,144-$.1: ,..i..itt,tif:iriA.>.1.:,i,rt*i''''.4$1...1VtcitC?:.2'4.,AiiiCtitig0.11.Ti'AbAl,kr...i*.1"'„ '1'...y,irti,'.'I '-'; iff'I'P'?',,• 4,14 f,j'',:l'.'..;';'?.'1.1..11;.4g%'I, ,,1,I,,•., ,,?,,,,k‘t,'4'..;:•,c,ft.-'i 'f.. .Fi.:.. '1.7.-04- ..7.-,,,7 0,..,, ,kal.J,NATIV;:tigil/14.0.;',F4;0t..':?A'hIP,t ti,'1,!,';g 14,24',1.0;";..st,4 ,,:ti:',1;"1'..4';!..I7-.441;.!.;'..',41,N1.1V,; ) -- -'A.1,17 AP...,.-ml.,.? -. ,f•-iiimio,v,f-,:‘,,,,.:4,44,.,g,ta,..,::;:;,:,...-.*...i.,,..tyl,„%:,40"-.1wii..ftfAtciitorlxilll'fil,k,a-'....4‘.•- -rtmi!!.:-!?:e.4por i,g,r,,,t,,,a i,... .. .:.,_ :..„4... 10.4 , ,.,.,sitt v ?,...,„(,„„,„,:ti.,.., ,. ,4.,t‘41.,',.q.,7,,d,• '?:."0.1!",,i'4,k1"-ii.'t d.e...:07.4;;;421,':lig.t,-,. ..T.•7;*,r.ri,'.11,P.t.:'''71 ' ' ''''g- '`,!'";."4V.'''&1"r''.7`• et '4''''''''''''''''''''.:i ;''''''" 4."'," 'm...i ''.''. ' . itf 1.444,4-... 4 pr`...?,!P(74.44,;4:1140;',:smii,....404•4,7fig..44,4,gwle,.....,.•''it', 4,.;:t '..‘,.,. .4)..:,--.1,',-.1„ot.,-T ..:.„''.:'f.4{e_ _.".A.. ,1-. . •',f..it,1..:.''''f .:, 1 ,-•,: •• 13;7,..,741;0,,,it) .I,..%44110', 7-'.14,'.',F•t4,4,..71' 441.. ,.1,:,-,t!',1,;:',- ..!-,''..ik"it..,4ii.. ,'i'.1.f;;;;.7"se":.;4,4it.k.' . , ::1''.'`.'"7 '46,$,..•‘,...':1'lit' l'i,:g.,r4. •le',14' .. 1,4.1, L'.la'.4,-,w,,,,,,,:vp' •:,..`, :;"1" lit 1,1,1-:„. i,p1A••••ls:.•.,k•IA:74•,••••1.1i.,,e,vi./.•v.:.1.1.,.;:;...•1:i••.,s,; -1 •.,N;•.•-•i.lt.r:;, ,•:';'•, •l•er,•.! .: -i0j,';-:.;,.*4.,,,-ti--,1 i q:-'::-Yt.04441,b4a,, 2-• -is.f.e";t;'. .ilii 4•...7.;-0151: '- ilic:', 14,-0. ,:•:,:.4-.14•4;:t.-••,:•Ifiii•, !Ifie•;.• ,..!"..„,,•1;;A:„ii,,,v -,.,,.•-••:4,7 4,tql.;!-•it.',4:.-i;',f,:',Ci tet 1-7,1:•7;:,,,..-V;',•A,,,i`e•P:4:1,;4„. !-;,•y,,,/.4-3,,..,:7;i•,,,,:z4,HIPS(4i;:4,4Ttitir";,),'N:1,AkS,„).,,,t.lilt.i•••gerv,„ ,,?„:el,i4V.Iitiv.fe,i,,:,,r1,1..,,iy...er...•x!l'i,i,...4.1;,,.,,i',::,'2•1,!,.'''',:i. t?ip:,,,."..1...ii.41'',,:i.,:lt-rj.-;,,,,,k,":4-,:).,?,.;,,f;. ,?y,',' :,,,F.,rA,:.•;-,,:-..;4'-:`ifi''•-•••c!,,,l 7Vz--,..,,,I, ;11.,z,,:fti,..,,ISe,Ot.1 1;,-,.:-.7.4,kit.:_,-4.,.:;,!•:4w.;'41:10--,,tt•x,._:1.,,Attm,•0:-sep,-,;lg.,el.N 4' '151 .. '4.f.gil..lix* -.-iii'lll,flt3 44,‘,":`e?it,..,-.ri.fc,-..:?.::::,..,4;-,.17.,,,,—ic-',..,,-.-,..q,.,'..,-..1!1'...iLl"....,f ric'.i_,itti.:;.f.,,%.„:1;i-,,:f..iNk:(,.::%.;4:0741:tiiiiikkg.ltqlrl..-PW•,0 k.,t'''tit'.4' 11'-,-:::*.figi. :4 i?j,;F;4'7,.'.'.,..rti,'.6.:i4:: '*.., .41-1Y.4'.4 0-•, .--''',';',.4;-4:;',1k '4,gtii''''';1-4?:,'JiT424.•PA/V41','!i,ii4f.4.'W'VO*,'Ai-11,•;;I:'•':-A:ki.',i4;:it ',-;. ',t.',14-"Yr.,!...iq'-,,..i.,!pk,?4,411,;...-ti .ti,k, X,:,:,,,,-4.%ii,-;.,4.p.,,,,,-.:.,•••••ei,:1,,,,,,44%•,i,, 7144'i,..,-.. ftl..,t.:',- .L4! ,,,,,,(..,,,4„,;,„1",„s4:",,,e,;:tk„.-0,-:-..P i tt,0,.).:41t4?.0.".:...YelE• r,,,.vti,.,,;si.,-1...,,,i...1,,,v.A, 4,44 ,e , --. -,....,1•.,...:1•A;, :s.1 1.It, ..,,,.....,.,,,...‘4, ?,•,13,1Ki..f:.q.;,i,iiii. 41,t:',"IlilVf•lvf ,,ifie.,o,ie.J. .. ...:,4.,7141.;,„,•,,K,4-.,-.,..,i v.v.i,gi.140,,,?:1,=.1'"f,O.,..!„'A...;'!...1 IV 4.,•,0 Az- .'- 'i'.-,,,.j.i.': 4.,'. "‘I''A'ISqt:', ilf,V•V,i';1.1.41%4ii Va 'TVitbiZ: -.44t)likfrill N:- 14%41'1 1*-,'41:4'S4‘,.`:)::,11%,;..7-'‘:. -444.'?1 :.:SNi.t.):/;?::;.±ti,i.,1 5,',ft'4,1f,: '.';,rikv..!:•;;i1.1: r:IVIfkaltirict;',;.';„, 4iii4.'%, 44'14-24e,?S',,;17.'4' ', •'y,. ,:'..4*. ' 1,N•ita4.fAilkii,1...4.t 1`4.1Prg4;,...*1 •'..14•1:•tiVi4i =';N40.71,\II-Alf.41;V- t:ItiAt...0,• ,0,44:5„:,44`--.•L';':, ': 4.Y.;;Ir rli:'.4 ' IV',i:::'6741.1t4Ifii.',1 ' l'•All!A i,_.;IA?,'.•'':,-t.'''',':':Y•hi,''0;',,.=-',. -,5-:„"';,:.. fl-',.seLlif:Al I:tz0A-..-titRti;ae,•:„4,1A_I„.0:741•*;.•,,...: .,,,4,•,,,,,$i:,,.)„v„---...•, „ ,•••:;';410;i•,i,RJ:7-;it'lt-'S'I- .?.,;-:::.,':'•.:'...:: ,:,i'.4 ;,..., '..'0,...i; T!'tz,}0...qtlkArM lgiATA,11,,,'.,,...,1,,,,i;,..;-;;• tte,,•,--•iiif,If,0:,:lc'ift,!-:,e;,, q,A:v..4.412!..-Oiti'g:',4'...,IN,Vilti'.1:s4g3W,4.)'.',11;,,7i$' ,....'FP,'';'''''''''h-4 ,1,..1,,':.\•;rt.:*' :'7to'.,giskii.'41.g. -.., :.;,..,..i, -,::5'4.3.,,,..i,•;,'i'.;,,'.,*,: tl,?.e'i'gr'':,,'.',,f.•, •.,!.:;),gi.1.•4?;,!..'ji-•-•'•',V,Iirk:c.i.,';',,,,iii.tf;:•:,?fil.sit•i'Eit.,.7„:,ii •.441;,•- ,-, A.1,, ;1 f.,;.:, `,.•i'J•-tit,,V.:5P NV‘•.';', .. .•'...`..i. ..'i,...k.,:.:!;- !;*!!,t, '..:4:.,..•,',,,,..'r•-,..•••.• '...-',.Y.,?-!•;•; :i,6vi-.4:1?[:,•:•.•.',r0.13.0...,,•••;tkii,ve,v.),.0.1 -gt,1 ‘x/r,',).1-0- •-44., 1',N4•,*1.4••,1.Y.fS;tipist.'.!.i.•;'.:,:it.".,:-,',1:.; ,i.:1,-.4-:',1••:+v,,;: ;',..--,''','.•.,..:•7i, I ii••=4:•.V-4 :.'-'•,q,11.1'N'ilf,5`k-'1'' 'Atli.;',* ':.4-cilli,5 ,4,i,:s.5. 71.ft40+13iSi,! '4.1g•-vi.'''''',': lt,i,f':-.Wi';•1'..LigrlY • 0.-!-',1, . ',.-'..-,i.,,' :::-.ill'".!".'gf..'” .,.•..ic'...'(.•", ' ';,:-;:,5,1.-';!....iir'.4.,tbi!,.:.;:;,,•.1-.5..cr!ek.A..,:,.0), ,Ii./i. .:Al;t2,. AS%t ,, ,,. vv$,J,!,y...:..,4,04,1)..V.',.;,1r,q4,55 ,t, •,,,4 i•,,t0:,''IT,-. , - ... ,:','d, ';''':.:,'' ' '''••'-‘•(.1. ....;'-1111,4:iiti".;01,4".iftl.;'°.e.Y,•••*,-,:f.. .',-;;,,-1.iV:f..,,,•.i,,i-4.Vg.„1,•ft:,4Vi..*Y;f44.11114V-4''i'-•.$.,%'..lkil•-,.--'6.-Ylif'i''''141/4.._,,.t.A.,,,,'•'...,inP,:...'- ', ..;.:i°';,.''..,..;:g:j'.: - '-;.‘'':.i t t J•t,.,,..,,) ,,,,,,,,,k .j..4,.,t„,.. •.':,:-. ,1,...,,,,;.....,,iai,,,,,•,,..,.....„._,.;.tf.,... ,A,..,..-.0,,,,,•,,,, ,;„ ,..,-.4:'t tp, v ',..,.,:r,.."''.41/,',.f.:viA).,,' .1,-,•;.:4,,,,''..:,,,,r-7:.'''''t,'''''4.11,...)t' '.. .e•.:‘,:i ,V1'.! ?,i,i.,"',..'ffr:,,,i:7.,;.1":1:?::,,:i.giiik,V;(1'40,144';'''.:7•14rtP'.-94''*.'1,..;Wt',.;4V^.Z%,0.& c'.''''.:i*4.'SyRt. '.ii, r.i'eltiiii:::fc-'7V;T.'11.4 .' 1: ..1 7,1':•..%;:''t,'','.,...,..T.:114..,- ,i'.,,..p.i...,:;.,,,..i',..r.:);:!...".i):...,7: 7 ,i'it'.i...`;‘,z,i:?,0.'Ait ',:l''?.P4'g! ,‘,. ;11,;;'',:-44 t,i1.;!,.?t,,r•••••4,,ItV•:',-Nitlf..,..;',,tf.i4t.--71',!::".',.--.:.:". •••••••''-.,'.'••,;; 'i.,..::',).',4 .,,.. ,:•;•,,,,,I,t•;•,..-,',,,•,:„-.,.:1 i..?.„,,,...1.,•,%s;•:41•.:;',A0'..30:al..,%::::t,E',:tn;1•5t74.fiT•4)•ti,,F'fi4,•_,t,e 1.40-?-ixtt 1..,qii..iiv::1.03,i crfi,N34.N.'.t.f.,,.4,.i..,,L,tfri,•A;.,.,Ili. 4:1,0,...--••-•e.'•-.•:.? r•-,d2',-;i?7,..;`,..',?&A', ( ,.;--,i•,•,4..k,i1',;it.,,,I.'t.i2,.. '57.t!,t,, e.‘tilr,,,1 z:,,,•170-241iii,.t.,,,..„.tr-v,.,)...p,i,i,,..' ,,,:#N-4=2,-...,,Tg..,....:•::•,..3 11.,,,i1,j,k1,-:;,,,. '• ,:.i...,,,,,...,i -4.;1'..%?'...1',iikr• .:".1',-.4.1 :1•P'.4..t.T.,, ,c42tY.•!;'•77.t:!..,.. ii!i'•,'Aiii:ViL;•.44.1,/.;:irok' •:.-f.it ,:',.4.',;...,.i-,(,,-,/, „.1.13,-,...,,,,-1.11, ev.„.!!!tk,,,,;.•,-,,,...,, :,1 y.,,,,,,,„:,. -,J,,...li 4 4 '.16$V=:;1.'.4:7'.!,itt",;"...4''/-!-74-,!tit7);;';.'1.•;•1-`,5•44":141"-.AT.:r1;*itYtti,!VV-.4"ci..?-§gt-.).1Jk.-.,..1f*-..7•14g-;:.', .""0.,,., " '..1"."-lt,,,.'t '''.1):''6;I •I'ellit.fl-t.'1-•t'f':Y4'-Y..1:C'T'i se T-.--'';'-' ' i""l'I.::".-! ."-it•-•••,-'s's't-" .•;'^.•'ILt.,;'..'/-':;:'"f4.141tit'tett),-;•-.,k,"•;-: -%"Zie,'"''...A t.3,':Z.'0',i,74"r;r,-"V'•4T,,-;;;' , t-.) -4e.t.k.....i,e' .4 ...,, ,•`,i qIL -..4i*: ,T,.."!..,..7.'..:.,,F:',?,V.:1;.. .kl,'.'...'4..e.::'.*:;,,,e;:...: 1„t'S..,..',.,:i.,4f.,-,,J.Iff;r1;,-.,,,I,Ii,,,':'..!.3q.).....it.A4,,,,O.1..-,4,,.;,.;,q • hi',A. -3..6 .;.. 94.,,14,,.4,•0.,, Pie,4 is,,,,y.,441.5.,,..2.•i .,..., '.',.,.3.,,,, '' ,V .,',..1`. 'tld ..j. ..i,....,'..,......2 k%7'.1 1,•••••-•-,,4,41!•_•,;',:;•:4,1,1:,,,,!•-,:oc•-•„•,-,---,A;•••••••",,!;•);,1,i,-•••i•1),J-•, )•.=Fm,',1•1 ;•'••- ,-,• . !.1.p.-,..r.7;.4,1 AV",:';'4',..,''at ii7-1,40'. ..."...,:t0t.. .,d,,,..''.. ,t.1‘..i.01.4.t.f. '''''.t''''!,'-. -r''''''‘''..b:''''',.,.:''''1:t•-in31 t'‘V.""tit'it?4• ",•?-4,4,'.-4,‘.","-,-" i',';t"'-i"-t't..417:qt4i•-• -ii.',4gli,1 l tik,:'"41-et, ., ••••',....,.rtt:tAtt''II-A• 1:;b1,..,t5p'1.iff',P,:-•.7,..7t;fe•i-,'; ;.-.;;.,..t.1..- ..,tc,•'-',. , 'i '. '..L! -1,.."'i.;-;''...,7.7;,1,',..'!:,•14';',,,, c,f.X:-%,Y;!:4'',';'..;i?1;:r..:i...!..".4.'•;,i4lit,.4b'''P;:•r,:t!,;-"',i?;it«ts‘',4i,f;qi7,,,,,,,..C.:t.lf,14i.‘"I',.A„,,K1.4.1- k;i.::..7i•"`f'74 ':.,,)'.':11,:i;..1',4:-)h4111,=•LiiiiT." it4..tl'i4i#1,7-4t11•;:'':'•;.'..."711,' 1/,'-•#5;;:f.•".'.:',.:1)14,1 iai:.‘;',..?;;;:i4',',•itA.;•,4',';itg,';#i...Zti,;•!•;!k'',i'','t'iV4.'"',,t4j.',:Mt...';'1'.';4:1.1,,, ;;:Y .?;:i.?j*:.?*4,,,,'!''..th 4,40P 4,•,,1.. ',,t'li 11;;,..Y:fp'P;IN7-1,74;,-,t ,t 't A.:1:41'4?..",;::-I,A; 41i-,1,31,•',:'•' !:.f.'';;'.1"-, .i-•.';‘•Pl.ci.•','''''....'N4 1',.:2',.. '•"..,_,Ilii.',.1,:tt:i.i;1"e•:F.Z....'104•kYriP.,..,ti-1„kge";1-1*Iliiril:-.qk 11,P,L•cl, '•-,',,. 'fl. g 011.,4,g*ri''4/iY,ligt.V:•-41.:--"•,t.4 ''.'4 1 '.‘?,.'"••'.• ,'''.!:'',.-' t •ft.','.i'''''./,'-'•';',":4,..-. st'Al--E.`.....14t''',';',4,14:14‘44:•;:i',..f',i'4,••4.:;.k. ,!01,21'::;•,i'92',141,••10....,1,,,‘•/,4 •'Lli•••,, filtdA ia,1•!,,....,'.•,,,i'!iJ,•.: t„,;.i..,:, ,••••t!..ti:30,-...,..11:,...t.:1,4.'e•ii:i..•;:''.i...'„'i.,,.....•,ii• "...I:.-:.,,,.,,1:::,...,Z•.,. ,:::.i.,::,,;:....,:::::::: :•'•.•,;-',:tr.;:•'''.)•!%:,fit.I 1 1:,'70S.:Z ;•`..•,:•.1,0;''i‘•,:i..1,4,'Aci.f,,j,3'1,1;gil'c:'..,;i_r',',/,•/•itil.ti:Cle ,41,1PON+iLii,i,4'.: .„..'.*,'.,4.•:".p. '.3.V1ki;,•,;!?,.1f.i.,I, ;47j• 11.15,a''',,Vik%S.G.I.riir.'•,::',i)'•4'51....7 '''', ,,*,';,' 4:,:il..'4.!,•-'..,;,4••,i10'I t•-,t'i,,,,t`..:I.1%.1:1•4'...',.;.:;i"'i,,t'.15ki!.";1,,li-yt•':#ii44. -ri,i,25ilyit.I4V;,1q1!:.,1414,..';11.!..it:,i,!X;.;4,ii‘;',.,;Y;(1 l'.1-.Pf'$'(1 i.`1,,,',VF.'t-.'11,•#*+••.f:,lic•ifl .' ;' •:-.:•••74.14,'')•,'-•:::.‘.'''','!'•:•I 4 '1.1i'''-';'''''''''''''.1"111 P'''"a ?.°''It'P:14.‘iii •;.ii..0# . -f;54:4'.'44',0.1.. t;A'it Alri,?..:14,iisMi..!..li.jf''..:.'7?,,c1,.‘A ./,t1:14 :'...''''''' '''.(' '''.:711.1*14'lletT4.41.i•ii,, ',..t:'''''''ji.:' ,41.1'''. ' 14','')F11A,,,.Li,i'.',.i'.ipt1.41 `''.',..Vkloi. etiA'Ul,"4- ,, 4.,.A.kli--,kix..i,r1,!.ww.q.,:.;1W! .•...;1.,6,,,' 4..g:.,,- .4-1/..k'''''''' -; ;:',.':41:ii,,,4•;".'4, - '-.',''P'ff.ii::,,,:,,,,F 1 I 4."li.,0,.'..,r"...,;+-3),•0'4,,,:vvetl,01,e'.. ' ,...41'IS •,..7,,,.165E-.1,,,S:44.4.,.,..!.,t:..,1.;.;!,,,,.:„.,•,..t,li e.,...?.;j10,..,...•.- 7,..,q,..,,pr.,.:....;I:k.54., ,;•.-.,.....^:4'n.^3.7.:.:,0.0.,,A,,,..04.•,...,.."'t.t.;' • •...`..1. 4..,..0.-pi.1.15„.3.,71...',F,!,:.!,;.-:',....1:,..1...,,..,.k..,.. .. r. .,,-,.....,-. ....,4., ig'•''• 'ci;-•.:,;A',;;; - ''.1,•,'•`:,;•••••1')P,:j, .:',::' •i4,41•••-.,i'•;•,!;•-i':•iittt;ti4,,,.4v4,:yasill 1Lr.•-•-- - ,--,.-••..,,,,•,,_.,,,. ,t,. . • A ig,5,4,.1.,,,.9...,.g. -, _ -14...7., ,',', V,N....;%.i- 4, 5 I...el...1,:,•'•s," - ' , ''..,,r i,.1-41,ik:.4.".".:j1"t.k'.;1$.•1'..i:'."td t3kh 1 r's ''.':'-?'',.1.,1i;':'i:14.:.. .:-'.,., •,..I,-A '•' --ii .,):YiSgtY.. • iA tiantic Western Consulting, Inc. Sprint Proposed Site - 415 Elijah's Lane, Mattituck ui..:'.:.:[: ':.: i:i..:ti.-r'.r'_....?::ii::ii::.i?:::.i...•.t..?,. ..::iF - I am a Property Consultant for Atlantic Western Consulting, Inc., and, in that capacity, negotiated a ground lease and colocation lease agreement for Sprint Spectrum L.P. for a site located at 415 Elijah's Lane, Mattituck, NY. The following factors were considered in the site selection of this location: Pursuant to the Southold Zoning Ordinance Section 100-163D2, the following alternate site was evaluated by Sprint Spectrum L.P. as a potential site for a wireless facility in the Town of Southold: Cutchogue Auto Precision, 21855 Route 48, Cutchogue, NY Existing monopole. Site was rejected due to its location. Location was too far north of intended coverage area. There are no other viable structures of sufficient height in the Mattituck area for a potential wireless facility. All other options would entail building a new structure in communities where the existing structures are substantially lower. The primary site, 415 Elijah's Lane, Mattituck, is an existing 100-foot monopole. Sprint Spectrum L.P. proposes to rebuild the structure to 110 feet. The 110-foot structure is necessary in order to support Sprint Spectrum L.P.'s antennas and provide adequate coverage for the intended coverage area. The new structure will also be constructed to meet the structural needs of the current and proposed inventory required for this wireless facility. ATLANTIC WESTERN CONSULTING, INC. • By: LO1L'ni Diane Enright d 400 West Cummings Park,Suite 4050 Woburn,Massachusetts 01801 ( t1anticWe stern Consulting,Inc. Sprint Proposed Site 415 Elijah's Land, Mattituck Affidavit of Good Faith Colocation Effort State of New York) ) SS.: County of Suffolk) Diane Enright, being duly sworn, deposes and says: I am a Property Consultant for Atlantic Western Consulting, Inc., and, in that capacity, have exercised a good faith effort to secure a wireless lease agreement for Sprint Spectrum L.P. in The Town of Southold to locate or colocate on an existing tower or other available and appropriate structure. As a result, a completed ground lease and colocation lease agreement was secured for a site located at 415 Elijah's Lane, Mattituck, NY. Pursuant to the Southold Zoning Ordinance Section 100-163D3, the site selected is a current wireless facility for other carriers. The structure proposed will also accommodate collocation of additional antennas for future users. The site was chosen as the optimal site in Mattituck because the addition of Sprint Spectrum L.P.'s antennas and equipment at the facility would blend aesthetically with the existing wireless equipment on site. Hence, the proposed structure will minimize the environmental impact in the area by eliminating the need for an additional structure in Mattituck. There are no other viable structures of sufficient height in the Mattituck area suited to serve as a wireless facility. All other options would entail building a new structure in communities where the existing structures are substantially lower. The primary site, 415 Elijah's Lane, Mattituck, is an existing 100-foot monopole. Sprint Spectrum L.P. proposes to rebuild the structure to 110 feet. The 110-foot structure is necessary in order to support Sprint Spectrum's antennas and provide adequate coverage for the intended coverage area. The new structure will also be constructed to meet the structural needs of the current and proposed inventory required for this wireless facility. i4/ZrAti Ad-44 Diane Enright Property Consultant Atlantic Western Consulting, Inc. Sworn to before me this ?3 day of 2000 ArAll •TXRYP :LIC Notary LAWRENCE Public, t of No. 52-4799664 400 West Cummings Park,Suite 4050 Qualified in'Suffolk County Commission Expires May 31,71r�6 f Woburn,Massachusetts 01801 Sprint PCS Wireless Communication Facilities which provide service to areas within the Town of Southold --..........— 41111"IPr -.0111111111MIIIIIIIIIIIIII 4111 .MEW i / ir�/a V —MINIMUM 11.. .A1111111111I ANNINI ----MMINIMINNIab. s11111111,1-411111111/ "11111111M111111111111,INI111111111/ s, "4111111•1111111111I 411111111MI 4 % - , Y07 �� VIIIIL ,..\,,_ ,,,------\ Y33XC6:,: "1111 CT6 �. YOTXC AmorIrlf, . Southold Sites At 4asswimr- / o.�� M ,/1,.. aWiar/MW �/ MINIM 1/1100/1 Air (5) Tf/ / *Proposed (1) Southold Town Line 't\ r, 'i .. oseT r""/t l` rbill" , ' �, Potential future search areas . 1111..,A0 within the next 12 months Potential future search areas 1 , of , --Nig% PCS SITE AGREEMENT April 88 Site Name AT,&T Lindsey Auto Parts Site I.D. NY33XC688 A 1. Premises and Use. Owner leases to Sprint Spectrum L.P.,a Delaware limited additional equipment to the Site. Likewise, Owner will not permit or suffer the partnership('SSLP'),the site described below: installation of any future equipment which (a) results in technical interference [Check appropriate box(es)) problems with SSLP's then existing equipment or(b)encroaches onto the Site. ® Land consisting of 375 square feet upon which SSLP will construct its ® 10. Utilities. Owner represents that utilities adequate for SSLP's use of the Site equipment base station. SSLP shall be permitted to replace the existing 100' are available. SSLP will pay for all utilities used by it at the Site. Owner will antenna structure with a new 110'antenna structure as shown on Exhibits C and cooperate with SSLP in SSLP's efforts to obtain utilities from any location provided D of this Agreement attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof. by Owner or the servicing utility, including signing any easement or other ❑Building interior space consisting of approximately square feet; instrument reasonably required by the utility company. ❑Building exterior space for attachment of antennas; 11. Termination. SSLP mayterminate this Agreement at anytime bynotice to p ❑Building exterior space for placement of base station equipment; 9 ❑Tower antenna space between the foot and foot level on the Tower; Owner without further liability it SSLP does not obtain all permits or other approvals(collectively,'approval')required from any governmental authority or any ®Space required for cable runs to connect PCS equipment and antennas, in the location(s) ("Site") shown on Exhibit C&D,together with a non-exclusive easements required from any third party to operate the PCS system,or if any such easement for reasonable access thereto and to the appropriate,in the discretion of approval is canceled, expires or is withdrawn or terminated, or if Owner fails to have proper ownership of the Site or authority to enter into this Agreement, or if SSLP,source of electric and telephone facilities. The Site will be used by SSLP for the purpose of installing, removing, replacing, modifying, maintaining and SSLP,for any other reason,in its sole discretion,determines that it will be unable operating, at its expense, a personal communications service system facility to use the Site. Upon termination, all prepaid rent will be retained by Owner unless such termination is due to Owner's failure of proper ownership or authority, (`PCS"), including, without limitation, antenna equipment, cable wiring, back-up power sources(including generators and fuel storage tanks),related fixtures and, or such termination is a result of Owner s default. if applicable to the Site,an antenna structure. SSLP will use the Site in a manner 12. Default. If either party is in default under this Agreement for a period of(a) which will not unreasonably disturb the occupancy of Owner's other tenants. 15 days following receipt of notice from the non-defaulting party with respect to a SSLP will,at its expense, replace the existing 100'AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. default which may be cured solely by the payment of money, or (b) 30 days Monopole with a 110'Monopole in accordance with an agreement between SSLP following receipt of notice from the non-defaulting party with respect to a default and AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. SSLP will have access to the Site 24 hours which may not be cured solely by the payment of money,then, in either event,the per day,7 days per week. non-defaulting party may pursue any remedies available to it against the defaulting 2. Term. The term of this Agreement(the'Initial Term')is 5 years,commencing party under applicable law,including,but not limited to,the right to terminate this on the date ("Commencement Date") both SSLP and Owner have executed this Agreement. If the non-monetary default may not reasonably be cured within a 30- Agreement. This Agreement will be automatically renewed for three additional day period, this Agreement may not be terminated if the defaulting party terms(each a "Renewal Term') of 5 years each, unless SSLP provides Owner commences action to cure the default within such 30 day period and proceeds notice of intention not to renew not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the with due diligence to fully cure the default. Initial Term or any Renewal Term. 13. Indemnity. Owner and SSLP each indemnifies the other against and holds 3. Rent. Until the date which is 60 days after the issuance of a building permit, the other harmless from any and all costs(including reasonable attorneys' fees) rent will be a one-time aggregate payment of$100.00,the receipt of which Owner and claims of liability or loss which arise out of the ownership, use and/or acknowledges. Thereafter, rent will be paid in equal monthly installments of occupancy of the Site by the indemnifying party This indemnity does not apply to $1,000.00(until increased as set forth herein), partial months to be prorated, in any claims arising from the sole negligence or intentional misconduct of the advance. Rent for each Renewal Term will be the annual rent in effect for the final indemnified party The indemnity obligations under this Paragraph will survive year of the Initial Term or prior Renewal Term,as the case may be, increased by termination of this Agreement. fifteen percent(15%). 14. Hazardous Substances. Owner represents that it has no knowledge of any 4. Title and Quiet Possession. Owner represents and agrees(a)that it is the substance, chemical or waste (collectively, 'substance') on the Site that is Owner of the Site;(b)that it has the right to enter into this Agreement;(c)that the identified as hazardous,toxic or dangerous in any applicable federal,state or local person signing this Agreement has the authority to sign; (d)that SSLP is entitled law or regulation.SSLP will not introduce or use any such substance on the Site in to access to the Site at all times and to the quiet possession of the Site throughout violation of any applicable law. the Initial Term and each Renewal Term so long as SSLP is not in default beyond 15. Subordination and Non-Disturbance. This Agreement is subordinate to the expiration of any cure period;and(e)that Owner shall not have unsupervised any mortgage or deed of trust now of record against the Site. However, promptly access to the Site or to the PCS equipment. after the Agreement is fully executed, Owner will use diligent efforts to obtain a 6. Assignment/Subletting.Tenant shall have the right to assign its rights under non-disturbance agreement reasonably acceptable to SSLP from the holder of any this Agreement without notice to or consent of Owner such mortgage or deed of trust. 6. Notices. All notices must be in writing and are effective only when deposited 16. Taxes. SSLP will be responsible for payment of all personal property taxes in the U S.mail,certified and postage prepaid,or when sent via overnight delivery. assessed directly upon and arising solely from its use of the communications Notices to SSLP are to be sent to:Sprint Spectrum,L.P.,4900 Main, Kansas City, facility on the Site. SSLP will pay to Owner any increase in real property taxes attributable solely to any improvements to the Site made by SSLP within 60 days Missouri 64112, Attn: Business Law Group; with copies to: Sprint PCS, 1 after receipt of satisfactory documentation indicating calculation of SSLP's share International Blvd., Mahwah, NJ 07495 Attn: Lease Management and Sprint Spectrum L.P., 4900 Main, Kansas City, MO 64112, Attn: Contracts of such real estate taxes and payment of the real estate taxes by Owner Owner Administration. Notices to Owner must be sent to the address shown underneath will pay when due all other real estate taxes and assessments attributable to the Owner's signature. property of Owner of which the Site is a part. 7. Improvements. SSLP may, at its expense,make such improvements on the 17. Insurance. SSLP will procure and maintain commercial general liability Site as it deems necessary from time to time for the operation of the PCS system. insurance, with limits of not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per Owner agrees to cooperate with SSLP with respect to obtaining any required occurrence for bodily injury and property damage liability, with a certificate of insurance to be furnished to Owner within 30 days of written request. Such policy zoning approvals for the Site and such improvements. Upon termination or expiration of this Agreement, SSLP may remove its equipment and improvements will provide that cancellation will not occur without at least 15 days prior written and will restore the Site to substantially the condition existing on the notice to Owner Each party hereby waives its right of recovery against the other Commencement Date,except for ordinary wear and tear and casualty loss. for any loss or damage covered by any insurance policies maintained by the 8. Compliance with Laws. Owner represents that Owner's property(includingwaning party Each party will cause each insurance policy obtained by it to P provide that the insurance company waives all rights of recovery against the other the Site),and all improvements located thereon,are in substantial compliance with party in connection with any damage covered by such policy. building, life/safety, disability and other laws,codes and regulations of applicable governmental authorities. SSLP will substantially comply with all applicable laws 18. Maintenance. SSLP will be responsible for repairing and maintaining the relating to its possession and use of the Site. PCS system and any other improvements installed by SSLP at the Site in a proper 9. Interference. SSLP will resolve technical interference problems with other operating and reasonably safe condition; provided, however if any such repair or maintenance is required due to the acts of Owner,its agents or employees,Owner equipment located at the Site on the Commencement Date or any equipment that shall reimburse SSLP for the reasonable costs incurred by SSLP to restore the becomes attached to the Site at any future date when SSLP desires to add damaged areas to the condition which existed immediately prior thereto. Owner • Y (4/ 1" will maintain and repair all other portions of the property rich the Site is a part OWNER: in a proper operating and reasonablysafe condition. By William J Baxter Jr 19. Miscellaneodb. (a) This Agreement applies to and binds the heirs, Its: successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the parties to this S.Slfax No: 11-6088856 Agreement; (b)this Agreement is governed by the laws of the state in which the Site is located;(c) If requested by SSLP,Owner agrees promptly to execute and Address:P 0 Box 802,Cutchogue,New York 11935 deliver to SSLP a recordable Memorandum of this Agreement in the form of Exhibit B; (d) this Agreement (including the Exhibits) constitutes the entire X See Exhibit Al for Continuation of Owner Signatures agreement between the parties and supersedes all prior written and verbal agreements, representations, promises or understandings between the parties. `\ Date: ,2 e,5 Ccs Any amendments to this Agreement must be in writing and executed by both parties; (e) if any provision of this Agreement is invalid or unenforceable with Spri p respect to any party, the remainder of this Agreement or the application of such n ectrum i provision to persons other than those as to whom it is held invalid or a Del�wrare ed pa / unenforceable, will not be affected and each provision of this Agreement will be By- -iK ('•�./`-� valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law; and (f)the prevailing Its: " party in any action or proceeding in court or mutually agreed upon arbitration Date: i/7(6-0 proceeding to enforce the terms of this Agreement is entitled to receive its reasonable attorneys'fees and other reasonable enforcement costs and expenses from the non-prevailing party 20. Non-Binding Until Fully Executed. This Agreement is for discussion purposes only and does not constitute a formal offer by either party This Agreement is not and shall not be binding on either party until and unless it is fully executed by both parties. The following Exhibits are attached to and made a part of this Agreement: Exhibits A,B,B1,C&D Attach Exhibit A-Site Description,Exhibit B-Memorandum of PCS Site Agreement; Exhibit B1 -Continuation of Owners; Exhibit C-Lease Area Plan and Exhibit D-Elevation Plan • • EXHIBIT A April99 Site Name AT&T Lindsey Auto Parts PCS Site Agreement Site I. D. NY33XC688 A Site Description Site situated in the Town of Southold County of Suffolk State of New York commonly described as follows: Legal Description: District 1000 Section 108 00 Block 04 00 Lot 11.003 Sketch of Site attached: Owner Initials SSLP Initials Note:Owner and SSLP m SSLP's option,replace this Exhibit with an exhibit setting forth the legal description of the property on which the Site is located and/or an as-built drawing depicting the Site. EXHIBIT B April 99 Site Name AT&T Lindsey Auto Parts PCS Site Agreement Site I. D. NY33XC688 A Memorandum of PCS Site Agreement This memorandum evidences that a lease was made and entered into by written PCS Site Agreement dated// Pict 2000, between William Baxter Jr., Patricia Baxter, Robert A. Goeller, Jr., and Jane P. Goeller('Owners")and Sprint Spectrum L.P., a Delaware limited partnership("SSLP"). Such Agreement provides in part that Owner leases to SSLP a certain site ("Site") located at 415 Elijah's Lane, Mattituck, Town of r Southold County of Suffolk State of New York within the property of Owner which is described in Exhibit A attached hereto, with grant of ease nt for unrptricted rights of access thereto and to electric and telephone facilities for a term of five (5) years commencing on !- 5 , 20c/4/Which term is subject to three(3)additional five(5)year extension periods by SSLP. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Memorandum as of the day and year first above written. 1 "OWNER" "SSLP" William J Baxter Jr Sprint Spe rum . / By t/C(A) J 47- I B ✓y: . i Name: William J. Baxter Jr. Name: Don Mueller Title: Owner Title: Director Site Development, East Region ® See Exhibit B1 for Continuation of Owner Signatures Address: 1 International Blvd., Mahwah, NJ 07495 Address: PO Box 802. Cutchooue. NY 11935 tit Owner Initials _ / SSLP Initials , P Attach Exhibit A-Site Description • i. • EXHIBIT B1 April 99 Site Name AT&T Lindsey Auto Parts PCS Site Agreement Site I.D. NY33XC688A Continuation of Owner Signatures "OWNER"• By Patricia Baxter Its: "OWNER 1, /L I/_ / if By:Robert A.Goeller,Jr Its: "OWNER" By:Jane P. oeller Its: LEGEND 4 Sprint N true LIGHT LINES DENOTE EXISTING CONDITIONS Sprint Spectrum LP (approx.) HEAVY LINES DENOTE PROPOSED CONDITIONS S:i'o"s - -E— POWER WIRING 340' —T— TELEPHONE WIRING —G— GROUND WIRING PROPOSED NOTES. 110 GATE .•1 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED ARE A CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE m �„ ® PROPOSED 12' X 30' BAM LEASE AGREEMENT ONLY ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION ,m _ `"` 230' MAY VARY TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES. SPRINT ORIENTATION EQUIPMENT SHELTER '5.. 2 SPRINT EQUIPMENT LINE-UP IS BASED ON AN ENHANCED PRIMARY SPRINT PPC CABINET 10'C' RADIO CABINET_AND LIGHTING FIXTUREEXHIBIT PROPOSED SPRINT EQUIP 3. PROPOSED ANTENNAS ARE NOT SHOWN. SEE SHEET LE-2. ON CONCRETE PIERS WITHIN \17,,..-� EXISTING WAREHOUSE ilmommiliAPPROVALS C 15' X 25' LEASE AREA !/ PROPOSED OMNIPOINT ^ % I •- '"c-i*G' EQUIPMENT ON CONCRETE �I ..0:i.. . �p�F,, PAD ��. •,Q��t\DO�R� I PR0.E[i x0:1219 *\ '•, . --•`N\S '\� I DRAWN BE:IDP I • \�•� FF'\C 101 \II‘e I aIECKCD BY:P.EP 11 J`- * y O: SUBwTTACS EXISTING ASPHALT a" I `r. "" ��lk PARKING 02/6/ODPER LWNENi PROPOSED CHAIN ; LINK FENCE (TO * EXISTING CHAIN MATCH EXISTING) PROPOSED CABLE * S LINK FENCE BRIDGE (TYP.) PROPOSED 110' MONOPOLE EXISTING I DO' MONOPOLE *\ / TO BE REMOVED / EXISTING AT&T * ♦. / EQUIPMENT SHELTER ♦ ® */ SCALE *�* _.../ AS SHOWN EXISTING NEXTEL EQUIPMENT SHELTER 1 LEASE AREA PLAN SEIE#33-688A LINDSEY AUTO ELIJAH LE-1 SCALE. 1"=20 SOU HO D ENY ROUTEE 25 GRAPHIC SCALE SHEET TIRE 20 0 10 20 NO 80 APPROVED BY:; LEASE AREA PLAN //II T� / Exhib.�C ( IN FEET ) SPRINT: ///J DATE: I/a SH ET NUNRFR I 1 inch = 20 [L I �r l , � �/ LE-1 LANDLORD: rL /' DATE. ,S ��:/ a I SPRINT ANTENNA SCHEDULE 1 1 LEGEND J Sprint SECTOR MECHANICAL i AZIMUTH HEIGHT DOWNTILT FEED ANTENNA LIGHT.LINES DENOTE EXISTING CONDITIONS Sprint Spectrum LP. ALPHA 1 340' 110' A.G.L. TO TOP 0' BOTTOM DB980H90T2E-M •• =•=•rt BETA 2 110' 110'A.G.L. TO TOP 0' BOTTOM 08980H90T2E—M HEAVY LINES DENOTE PROPOSED CONDITIONS =''T., '� ' GAMMA 3 230' 110' A.G.L. TO TOP 0' BOTTOM D8980H90T2E—M .i z,o�o NOTES. :..aon : GPS - - 30' A.G.L. FURNISHED BY LUCENT I EXHIBITS SUBMITTED ARE A CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE NOTES: LEASE AGREEMENT ONLY ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION 1 ANTENNAS LISTED MAY VARY, DEPENDING ON SYSTEM PERFORMANCE. MAY VARY TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES. PROPOSED SPRINT GPS -••• ANTENNA CO 110' 110'± APPROVALS I �'I�,II PROP SPRINT PANEL ANTENNA (TYP FOR 9, 6 SHOWN) EXHIBIT 98'± � ��AT&T ANTENNA (TYP FOR 9, 6 SHOWN) 90'± NMI u nnun u ' H-1-I PROP NEXTEL PANEL ANTENNA 80'± (TYP FOR 12, 8 SHOWN) I PRO ECi N0:1279 O 0 I H PROP BAM PANEL ANTENNA I °Rt JPO (TYP FOR 9, 6 SHOWN) I O CNED RE REP 611RLIrrus 65'± EXIST./PROPOSED OMNIPOINT a9E ,. A Prox ANTENNA (TYP FOR 3) o2/�laaREwEw X xo 02/16/ 00PER=LENT 1 PROPOSED 110' REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE PROPOSED 12' X 30' BAM EQUIPMENT SHELTER EXISTING NEXTEL EQUIPMENT PROPOSED SPRINT SHELTER (BEYOND) EQUIPMENT ON CONCRETE I PIERS PROPOSED CABLE EXISTING BRIDGE (TYP.) WAREHOUSE EXISTING AT&T EQUIPMENT SHELTER (BEYOND) PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCE (TO MATCH EXISTING) SS E EXIST./PROPOSED OMNIPOINT AS HOwN ® — m I' 1 EQUIPMENT ON CONCRETE ::•a; .�:�g.;: ::'.5"^ .a•' e::•:;::; as Pa,y PAD ...' >:: .. . . ::::::::::::::::::f..•AAA •'+a' SITE b 33-688A ...........o❖ %•..oma::• ❖.o•'•:•'•'•'•:•' LINDSEY AUTO ELIJAH LANE Jr ROUTE 25 SOUTHOLD, NY A7, ELEVATION SCALE. SHEEN ISE 1 =20' APPROVED ELEVATION Ehlblt,./) I SPRINJ: // DATE.1TH lit.id SNEET NUUBER LANDLORD...-: t,GUI'' LE—2 LANDLDATE. • SSLP NOTARY BLOCK: STATE OF COUNTY OF i ! t ' day of apri I , 20 00 , by The foregoing instrument as acknowledged before me this c J 1yiiJO(k for . VZU(.t(OK , ) irSJe - A) of the partnership,who executedforegoing instrument on behalf of such corporation. Sprint Spectrum L.P., a Delaware limited (AFFIX NOTARIAL SEAL) FFICIAL NO Y SIGNATOR NOTARY PU C—STATE OF LAURA JEAN THOMAN Notary Public of New Jersey My Commission Expires February 4,2002 My commission expires: (PRINTED,TYPED OR STAMPED NAME OF NOTARY) STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 ' by • (AFFIX NOTARIAL SEAL) (OFFICIAL NOTARY SIGNATURE) NOTARY PUBLIC—STATE OF My commission expires: (PRINTED,TYPED OR STAMPED NAME OF NOTARY) OWNER NOTARY BL K: William .Baxter ,l STATE OF (iiiCOUNTY OF r'1A- J dayof 'Mxi-- , 200V, The foregoing instrument was acknowl dged before me this ❑ by (t3S-11 1.1411 -1' tail , 0 by , as of , a corporation, on behalf of the corporation, by , partner(or agent)on behalf of , a partnership. 4:274-b.VA._./ A&2 (AFFIX NOTARIAL SEAL) (OFFICIAL NOTARY SIGNATURR44 RY p� �ifF1(;IAINOYARYSEJU NOTARY PUBLIC--STATE OF f iteb`-- o1P e!i KATHLEEN F KORTE x tom) * COMMISSION NUMBER KATHLEEN F. KORTE .l= a CC90079B Y.A � MY COMMISSION EXPIRES OF F\---go JAN.24,2004 PRINTED,TYPED OR STAMPED NAME OF N TARP) My commission e 'ce: ( . 9 g/ I'gS�VC)F'J � �COMMISSION NUMBER: / ��- STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 ❑ by 0 b , as of , a corporation, on behalf of the corporation, by , partner(or agent)on behalf of , a partnership (AFFIX NOTARIAL SEAL) (OFFICIAL NOTARY SIGNATURE) NOTARY PUBLIC—STATE OF My commission expires: (PRINTED,TYPED OR STAMPED NAME OF NOTARY) COMMISSION NUMBER: OWNER NPTARY BLOCK: Patricia Baxte / _ STATE OF C1 COUNTY OF / i/� The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of "37-#4-Ci- The ` , 20 60, ❑ by ?kIRi C I A aci V Ee , 0 by , as of , a corporation, on behalf of the corporation, by , partner(or agent)on behalf of �,y, a partnership. . 1 . z •4C t(OFFillaia.,,( TARY SIGNATURE) (AFFIX NOTARIALSEAL) nn � .-.-o_ -•lf-01J, Y 3 A1. NOTARY PUBLIC—STATE OF �X p��aY pi, KACHLEe'N F KORI COMMISOION NUMBER KATHLEEN F. KORTE t ..;liu•i, ¢ CC9oo79e 7.,A r." � MY COMMISSION EXPIRES My commission e • _Op F � JAN.24 2004 (PRINTED,TYPED OR STAMPED NAME OF NOTARY) COMMISSION NUMBER: (9(1,f001 n STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , ❑ by ❑ by , as of , a corporation, on behalf of the corporation, by , partner(or agent)on behalf of , a partnership (AFFIX NOTARIAL SEAL) (OFFICIAL NOTARY SIGNATURE) NOTARY PUBLIC—STATE OF My commission expires: (PRINTED,TYPED OR STAMPED NAME OF NOTARY) COMMISSION NUMBER: tt _ OWNER NOTARY BLOCK: Robed A.Goeller / STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 Oby , Oby , as of , a corporation, on behalf of the corporation, by , partner(or agent)on behalf of , a partnership (AFFIX NOTARIAL SEAL) (OFFICIAL NOTARY SIGNATURE) NOTARY PUBLIC—STATE OF St jf, ri_44t4:,1( My commission expires: (PRINTED,TYPED OR STAMPED NAME OF NOTARY) COMMISSION NUMBER: STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 O by O by , as of , a corporation, on behalf of the corporation, by , partner(or agent)on behalf of , a partnership. (AFFIX NOTARIAL SEAL) (OFFICIAL NOTARY SIGNATURE) NOTARY PUBLIC—STATE OF My commission expires: (PRINTED,TYPED OR STAMPED NAME OF NOTARY) COMMISSION NUMBER: 'I CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT ,'- , 5 . c cS; vet>c Y' K. =4cf &-ous ‹,- &-k,. < " " . cc> .cc.. Ic (� 9i 0State of California .I SS. yl g County of L ` vua .1 '$) • On /��✓►4 -/.S ZdiD evn ' �.'x.' gE O1 /cf'�/ �°6l`4' 1 r , before me, 1 Date Name and Title of Officer(e.g.,'Jane Doe,Notary Public') 1 V LO /4 A9ruL 'persoally appeared 1-4- Name(s)of Signer(s) 9 g Impersonally known to me 0 LIproved to me on the basis of satisfactory )) 0 evidence s to be the persong whose names) is/ r ::l .,• CHRISTIAN SEATON16 subscribed to the within instrument and 1 PI ;� `; Commission#1236819 acknowledged to me that he/staeeey executed 9, < ; ,.~ = z _. '�. Notary Public-California � the same in his/kF�rktFif®fr authorized Z =;T.j11 Santa Barbara County capacity(4s), and that by his/tiet<lt#e. i My Colnm.Expires Oct 7,2D03 signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or ' the entity upon behalf of which the person(' ' �� acted, executed the instrument. 8 WITNESS my . rid a d o ' ',.I eal. ?' � l Place Notary Seal Above Signature of Notary Public 'Si OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law,it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document ?� „4 and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. ?� 6 ,614 Description of Attached Document g Title or Type of Document: l 1. Document Date. Number of Pages: 0 Signer(s) Other Than Named Above. R P Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer I p Signer's Name: RIGHT THUM IGTHur PRINT OF R ❑ Individual '‘',Top of thumb here ❑ Corporate Officer—Title(s)- it ❑ Partner—❑Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Fact i S p ❑ Trustee q ? ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other- fiSigner Is Representing: P ip ©1997 National Notary Association•9350 De Solo Ave..P.O.Box 2402•Chatsworth.CA 91313-2402 Prod.No.5907 Reorder Call Toll-Free 1-800-876-6827 OWNER NOTARY BLOCK: Jane P.Goellei • STATE IOF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , ❑by , ❑ by , as of , a corporation, on behalf of the corporation, by , partner(or agent)on behalf of , a partnership. • (AFFIX NOTARIAL SEAL) (OFFICIAL NOTARY SIGNATURE) NOTARY PUBLIC—STATE OF My commission expires: (PRINTED,TYPED OR STAMPED NAME OF NOTARY) COMMISSION NUMBER: STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 0 b , ❑ by , as of , a corporation, on behalf of the corporation, by , partner(or agent)on behalf of , a partnership (AFFIX NOTARIAL SEAL) (OFFICIAL NOTARY SIGNATURE) NOTARY PUBLIC—STATE OF My commission expires: (PRINTED,TYPED OR STAMPED NAME OF NOTARY) COMMISSION NUMBER: ' p CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT �.,c,>-c�>,,c,. .cr,c. C.c-c G 4,,,c>-cC >.c,w`ce c.r,,rc-<ac,,n.c.te-.,C ..cc ccec,c,,',c(f.e�-c.> -cc>, c� >,cr�y 1� 1 ,� State of California p County of £t t/(Y�cL ss. I fi On H�y`k 15, 24�v , before me, (� S�C✓)L• S��rtPvn, c' j P' L Name and Title of Officer(e.g.,"Jane Doe,Notary Public") Date fi ja E) P i �r , g personally appeared Ig Name(s)of Signer(s) yl 5 , i-personally known to me 01 fifi0 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory .1 g evidence 1 I fi to be the person whose name( .) is/ate fi subscribed to the within instrument and fi .. , CHRISTIAN SEATON acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed fi ;,M . Commission#1236819 < ; - �; = the same in 1;►is/herLtt4air authorized Ifi z _ ,�, Notary Public-California � Z �` '"' ca acit lets and that bylits/her/titets fi ��.�� Santa Barbara County P Y(• )� fi MyComm.Expires Oct 7,2003 signature(t) on the instrument the person's), or fi the entity upon behalf of which the persons) acted, executed the instrument. r fi g fiWITNESS my hand and offs ' seal. fi gPlace Notary Seal Above Signature of Nola ublic Ih fi OPTIONAL gThough the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document 2„c and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. 'Ip Description of Attached Document ig Title or Type of Document: Document Date. Number of Pages: ip 16 Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: p Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name. RIG O THUMBPRINT I El Individual TopR q of thumb here ❑ Corporate Officer—Title(s) p ❑ Partner—0 Limited 0 General ?� p ❑ Attorney in Fact p 0 Trustee u Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: fi Signer Is Representing: ®1997 National Notary Association•9350 De Soto Ave..P.O Box 2402•Chatsworth,CA 91313.2402 Prod.No.5907 Reorder Call Toll-Free 1-800-876-6827 EXHIBIT A SITE LEASE ACKNOWLEDGMENT This Site Lease Acknowledgment is made to the Master Lease Agreement between AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., d/b/a Cellular Telephone Company, a New York General Partnership and Sprint Spectrum L.P. dated , 2000. Capitalized terms used in this SLA have the same meaning as such terms in the Master Lease Agreement unless otherwise indicated. 1. Site Name and Number: Site Number 228-Mattituck 2. Site Address: 415 Elijah's Lane,Mattituck,New York 11952 3. Site Legal Description: See Legal Description attached to this acknowledgment as Exhibit 1 4. Site Latitude and Longitude: Latitude 40-59.955 and Longitude 72-30.628 5. Commencement Date: Upon Building Permit. 6. Fees: $500.00 per month plus term increases of fifteen (15%)percent 7. Term: Expiring December 31, 2005 8. Renewal Options: Three successive five (5) year periods 9. The Site is owned by Lessor X The Site is leased by Lessor. A copy of the lease is attached to this SLA. 10 Lessor contact for emergencies: Northeast Operations Control Center 1-800-832-6662 11. Lessee contact for emergencies: Mgr. Site Development—Mauro Carda77.i 1-888-587-7904 12. Description of Communications Facility: See Sprint Spectrum Lease Exhibit attached to this acknowledgment as Exhibit 2. Special provisions: A. All construction and installation work at this site must be coordinated through, managed by and supervised by Papay Engineering& Construction Inc. at the sole cost and expense of Sprint Spectrum LP. B. Lessee agrees to pay all of the cost of constructing the new structure and removing the existing structure("Tower") on the Site with ownership of the Tower resting solely with Lessor. Lessee shall not be entitled to any collocation revenue or joint development fees received by Lessor from another carrier during the initial term, or any renewal terms, of this Site Lease. Reasonable cost and expenses of installing the new Tower and removing the existing Tower will include, but will not be limited to: 1) Design and development, including, but not limited to, engineering 2) Construction and installation; and 3) Cost of obtaining all required permits, variances, and other required governmental approvals, if any. Sslal68 • 4) The cost of moving the carriers (AT&T Wireless Services and Nextel Communications) currently occupying space on the existing Tower to the new Tower. This move will be coordinated with the carriers(AT&T Wireless Services and Nextel Communications) currently occupying space on the existing tower to insure that the move is made during times of least traffic. 5) Removing the foundation of the existing Tower to a level below grade established by the Lessor and grading the area of the existing Tower to match the surroundings. C. Taxes: Lessee will pay, within thirty(30) days of reasonable proof of same from Lessor, its pro rata share of any increase in real property taxes directly attributable to the construction and use of the Tower on the Site. In the event that the number of parties located on the Tower decreases, the remaining parties agree to apportion any tax increase evenly between the remaining parties. D. Any of Lessee's equipment associated with its Communications Facility, and not appropriately installed on the Tower, will be stored in with Lessee's equipment on on land adjacent to Site, under a separate agreement between Lessee and Owner. E. Tower Work: Any and all installations, routine repair, or emergency work by Lessee on Lessee's equipment on the Tower must be performed by a tower contractor("Contractor") approved in writing by Lessor. Such Contractor must have a valid certificate of insurance on file with Lessor. Licensee will notify Lessor prior to any work being performed on the Tower. F. The Lessee is responsible for insuring that during the construction of the new Tower, that during the moving of the carriers (AT&T Wireless Services and Nextel Communications) currently occupying space on the existing Tower to the new tower and during the removal of the old tower the carriers (AT&T Wireless Services and Nextel Communications) currently occupying space on the existing Tower service is not impaired and remain in full operation. In the event the carriers (AT&T Wireless Services and Nextel Communications) currently occupying space on the existing Tower service is interrupted the Lessee shall pay the Lessee the sum of$2,000 per day of service interruption. G. Lessor agrees that it will require all future third party collacation tenants, except for AT& T Wireless Services, Inc.and Nextel Communications, its successors and/or assigns, subsidiaries, etc., to reimburse Lessee for the costs of construction as defined herein. LESSEE . LESSOR: SPRINT ECTRUM L.P. AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES, INC. By: Tdam "Don 1- Names:Thomas C. brosino it-K: Director Site P velopment East Region Title:Director Network Realization Date: ci(71 Date: .' /=p /7,/ 2 4 • Exhibit 1 Site situated in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, commonly described as follows: Legal Description: 415 Elijah's Lane, Mattituck,NY 11952 District 1000 Section 108 Block 4 Lot 11.3 Lessor Initials 4, Lessee Initials 7- n Ss1a168 Exht'D6& z LEGEND �-Sn�11t N true �e r (approx.) LIGHT LINES DENOTE EXISTING CONDITIONS Sprri tSpectrum LP. HEAVY LINES DENOTE PROPOSED CONDITIONS ;; 340' —E— POWER WIRING —T— TELEPHONE WIRING —C— GROUND WIRING PROPOSED NOTES. •P 110. GATE ,.1 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED ARE A CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTATION CF THE 230' PROPOSED 12' X 30' BAM LEASE AGREEMENT ONLY ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION SPRINT ORIENTATION EQUIPMENT SHELTER MAY VARY TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES. SPRINT PPC CABINET 0' 2. SPRINT EQUIPMENT LINE-UP IS BASED ON AN ENHANCED PRIMARY ALS AND LIGHTING FIXTURE 1 RADIO CABINET PROPOSED SPRINT EQUIP 3. PROPOSED ANTENNAS ARE NOT SHOWN. SEE SHEET LE-2. v....A._ — ON CONCRETE PIERS WITHIN 0 \ XT\GALT TING WAREHOUSE? LEAS. 1 15' X 25' LEASE AREA \i" !/ PROPOSED OMNIPOINT •,, `�aG� =«1, 1� EQUIPMENT ON CONCRETE �\si* UR I :es=P..w RSV + �PARKiNv 02/16/00 PEO C .U PROPOSED CHAIN 02/16/00 PER COwENI • 1 LINK FENCE (TO + opew• MATCH EXISTING) EXISTING CHAIN PROPOSED CABLE + 0 �.,----LINK FENCE BRIDGE (TYP.) PROPOSED 110' + MONOPOLE EXISTING 100' MONOPOLE ,, ® / TO BE REMOVED \ ,../.. EXISTING AT&T EOUIPMENT SHELTER + • ® /111111 ,,/ BSN' +�•/ AS SHi EXISTING NEXTEL EQUIPMENT SHELTER 1 LEASE AREA PLAN SITE i 33-688A LINDSEY AUTO SCALE. 1�=20' ELIJAH UNE&ROUTE 25 LE-1 SOUTHOLD,NY GRAPHIC SCALE 2D 0 10 20 ♦0 60 SHEET 0TS nmenneimmi APPROVED BYLEASE AKA PUN Exhi mut 2 1 ( IN FEET ) SPRINT: ,. ' DATE.413100 SHEET MAWI i. inch = 20 ft. �, ,f� LE-1 LANDLORD: DATES` el0 Sprint • Spectrum LP TEMPORARY DELEGATION OF APPROVAL AUTHORITY To: Controller - Sprint Spectrum I .. Don Mueller Pirectokof Site Development NY. NJ, Philly Authorizing Name (Print/Type) Title • In accordance with Sprint Spectrum Financial Policy 9.1, do hereby delegate my fiscal approval authority to: $ite Development Manager Greg Primeau 375-68-6047 Title Employee Name (Print/Type) Social Security Number For the following department(s): Department Numbers) 13)42 1 10,)00:1 10009)09 zO 100 20 102 This delegation is effective for the period: 8:00 am through 5:00 pm Monday April 3, 2000 1, i (Not to exceed 30 days) and is necessary due to * * *© * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • * * * * * " ett.cf Z /5/4)0 Signature oferson receiving to ..y.ry delegati. 'bate 4111111M . - 41/ d . /4. 0' di � 33 CC) Signature of person whose authority is being delegated Da e A copy of this completed form should accompany all individual financial commitments or expenditure documentation approved under the above temporary delegation. . Bell Labs Lucent Technologies Innovations for Lucent Technologies An Analysis of the Radiofrequency Environment in the Vicinity of a Proposed Personal Communications Services Installation Site NY33XC688: Elijah's Lane and Route 25, Southold, New York Prepa •: by , Gerald Minneci, : EE, MSEE RF En:meer Wireless & Optical Technologies Safety Department Bell Laboratories • Murray Hill,New Jersey 07974-0636 Prepared for Michael Hughes Sprint Spectrum L.P. Crossroads Corporate Center 1 International Boulevard Mahwah,NJ 07495 August 23, 2000 PCS Site NY33XC688: Southold,NY-2 Table of Contents Summary 3 1.Introduction 4 2.Technical Data 4 3.Environmental Levels of RF Energy 4 4.Comparison of Environmental Levels with RF Standards 5 5.Discussion of Safety Criteria 5 6.For Further Information 7 7. Conclusion 8 8.References 9 PCS Site NY33XC688: Southold,NY-3 An Analysis of the Radiofrequency Environment in the Vicinity of a Proposed Personal Communications Services Installation Site NY33XC688: Elijah's Lane and Route 25,Southold,New York Summary This report is an analysis of the radiofrequency (RF) environment surrounding the Sprint PCS antennas proposed for installation in Southold,NY. The analysis includes contributions from the existing AT&T Cellular radio, Verizon Cellular radio, VoiceStream Wirless personal communications services (PCS) and Nextel Ehanced Specialized Mobile Radio (ESMR) antennas. Engineering data provided by Sprint together with well-established analytical techniques were used for calculating the RF fields associated with Cellular radio, PCS, and ESMR antennas. Worst-case assumptions were used to ensure safe-side estimates, i.e., the actual values will be significantly lower than the corresponding analytical values. The maximum level of RF energy associated with each transmitting antenna was compared with the appropriate frequency-dependent exposure limit, and these individual comparisons were combined to ensure that the cumulative RF environment is in compliance with safety guidelines. The results of this analysis indicate that the maximum level of RF energy to which the public may be exposed is below all applicable health and safety limits. Specifically, in all normally accessible areas surrounding the installation, the maximum level of RF energy associated with simultaneous and continuous operation of all proposed and existing transmitters will be less than 2.0% of the safety criteria adopted by the Federal Communications Commission as mandated by the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 is the applicable Federal law with respect to consideration of environmental effects of RF emissions in the siting of personal wireless facilities. The maximum level of RF energy will also be less than 2.0% of the exposure limits of ANSI, IEEE,NCRP,the limits used by the State of New York Department of Health and the limits used by all states that regulate RF exposure. ?CS Site NY33XC688: Southold,NY-4 1. Introduction This report was prepared in response to a request from Sprint PCS for an analysis of the radiofrequency (RF) environment associated with the proposed PCS antenna installation and an opinion regarding the concern for public health associated with long-term exposure in this environment. The analysis includes the contribution from the existing AT&T Cellular radio, Verizon Cellular radio, VoiceStream Wireless PCS, and Nextel ESMR radio facilities co-located at this site. The Telecommunications Act of 1996[1] is the applicable Federal law with respect to consideration of environmental effects of RF emissions in the siting of wireless facilities. With respect to personal communication services, e.g., cellular radio, PCS, and ESMR, Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 states the following: "No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commission's regulations concerning such emissions." Therefore, the purpose of this report is to ensure that the RF environment associated with this facility complies with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) guidelines as required by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which is also the same as the safety criteria used by the State of New York Department of Health(NYS DOH). • 2. Technical Data The proposed PCS antennas are to be co-located with existing Cellular radio, PCS, and ESMR antennas mounted on a monopole located at Elijah's Lane and Route 25 in Southold, NY. The ESMR and Cellular radio antennas transmit at frequencies between 851 and 866 million hertz (MHz). (These frequencies were formerly allocated for UHF television channels 77 through 79). The PCS antennas transmit at frequencies between 1930 and 1990 MHz The actual RF power propagated from Cellular radio, PCS and ESMR antennas is usually less than 10 watts per transmitter (channel) and the actual total RF power is usually less than 200 watts per sector (assuming the maximum number of transmitters are installed and operate simultaneously and continuously, which is rarely, if ever, the case). These are extremely low power systems when compared with other familiar radio systems, such as AM, FM, and television broadcast, which operate upwards of 50,000 watts. The attached figure, which depicts the electromagnetic spectrum, lists familiar uses of RF energy. Table 1 lists engineering specifications for the proposed and existing systems. 3. Environmental Levels of RF Energy The antennas used for Cellular radio, PCS, and ESMR systems propagate most of the RF energy in a relatively narrow beam (in the vertical plane) directed toward the horizon. The small amount of energy that is directed along radials below the main beam directly under the antennas is not remarkably different from the environment, in the main beam, at points more distant. PCS Site NY33XC688: Southold,NY-5 The methodology used to calculate the exposure levels follows that outlined by the FCC in OET • Bulletin No. 651. For the case at hand, the maximal potential exposure levels associated with simultaneous and continuous operation of Sprint PCS transmitters can be readily calculated at any point in a plane at any height above grade. Based on the information shown in Table 1, the maximum power density associated with these antennas, at any point in a horizontal plane 6 ft above grade will be less than 1.187 millionths of a watt per centimeter squared (1.187 1.1.W/cm2) and will be less than 1.460 µW/cm2 at any point in a corresponding plane 16 ft above grade. The latter would be representative of the maximum power density immediately outside the upper floor of nearby private homes(assuming level terrain). The maximum power densities associated with the existing antennas are listed in Table 2. The levels are also shown in Table 2 expressed as a percentage of the FCC's maximum permissible exposure (MPE) values found in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (specifically, in the FCC Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation [2]). The above values are the theoretical maxima that could occur and are not typical values. For example, the calculations include the effect of 100% field reinforcement from in-phase reflections. The assumption was also made that each transmitter operates continuously at maximum power. Experience has shown that the analytical technique used is extremely conservative. That is, actual power density levels have always been found to be smaller than the corresponding calculated levels even when extrapolated to maximum use conditions (all transmitters operating simultaneously) [3]. Also, levels inside nearby homes and buildings will be lower than those immediately outside because of the high attenuation of common building materials at these frequencies and, hence, will not be significantly different from typical ambient levels. 4. Comparison of Environmental Levels with RF Safety Criteria Table 2 shows the calculated maximal RF power density levels in the vicinity of the proposed and existing installations; Table 3 shows federal, state and consensus exposure limits for human exposure to RF energy at the frequencies of interest. Because the MPEs vary with frequency, the calculated RF levels must first be weighted with frequency (the percentages are shown in Table 2) and then combined before comparing with the safety guidelines. With respect to FCC limits for public exposure, comparisons of the combined weighted analytical results indicate that the maximal level associated with the proposed and existing antennas is at least 50 times below the MPE, i.e.,2.0%of the MPE. 5. Discussion of Safety Criteria Publicity given to speculation about possible associations between health effects and exposure to magnetic fields from electric-power distribution lines, electric shavers and from the use of hand- held cellular telephones has heightened concern among some members of the public about the possibility that health effects may be associated with any exposure to electromagnetic energy. Many people feel uneasy about new or unfamiliar technology and often want absolute proof that something is safe. Such absolute guarantees are not possible since it is virtually impossible to prove that something does not exist. However, sound judgments can be made as to the safety of a physical agent based on the weight of the pertinent scientific evidence. This is exactly how safety guidelines are developed. The overwhelming weight of scientific evidence unequivocally indicates that biological effects associated with exposure to RF energy are threshold effects, i.e., unless the exposure level is I OET Bulletin 65,Edition 97-0I,August 1997 Federal Communications Commission,Office of Engineering and Technology,Washington,DC PCS Site NY33XC688: Southold,NY-6 sufficiently high the effect will not occur regardless of exposure duration. (Unlike ionizing radiation, e.g., X-rays and nuclear radiation, repeated exposures to low level RF radiation, or nonionizing radiation, are not cumulative.) Thus, it is relatively straightforward to derive safety limits. By adding safety factors to the threshold level at which the most sensitive effect occurs, conservative exposure guidelines have been developed to ensure safety. At present, there are more than 10,000 reports in the scientific literature which address the subject of RF bioeffects. These reports, most of which describe the results of epidemiology studies, animal and cell-culture studies, have been critically reviewed by leading researchers in the field and all new studies are continuously being reviewed by various groups and organizations whose interest is developing health standards. These include the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, the standards committees sponsored by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, the International Radiation Protection Association under the sponsorship of the World Health Organization, and the National Radiological Protection Board of the UK. All of these groups have recently either reaffirmed existing health standards, developed and adopted new health standards, or proposed health standards for exposure to RF energy. For example, in 1986, the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) published recommended limits for occupational and public exposure[4]. These recommendations were based on the results of an extensive critical review of the scientific literature by a committee of the leading researchers in the field of bioelectromagnetics. The literature selected included many controversial studies reporting effects at low levels. The results of all studies were weighed, analyzed and a consensus obtained establishing a conservative threshold upon which safety guidelines should be based. This threshold corresponds to the level at which the most sensitive, reproducible effects that could be related to human health were reported in the scientific literature. Safety factors were incorporated to ensure that the resulting guidelines would be at least ten to fifty times lower than the established threshold, even under worst-case exposure conditions. The NCRP recommendations for both continuous occupational and public exposure to RF energy at the frequencies of interest are shown in Table 3. (Table 3 also includes a summary of the corresponding safety criteria recommended by various organizations throughout the world.) In July of 1986,the Environmental Protection Agency published a notice in the Federal Register, calling for public comment on recommended guidance for exposure of the public[5]. Three different limits, ranging from approximately 500 to 5000 p.W/cm2 at PCS frequencies and from approximately 275 to 2,750 µW/cm2 at ESMR and cellular radio frequencies, were proposed. In 1987 the EPA abandoned its efforts and failed to adopt official federal exposure guidelines. However, 1993 and 1996 the EPA, in its comments on the FCC's Notice of Proposed Rule Making to adopt safety guidelines[6], recommended adoption of the 1986 NCRP limits[4]. In September 1991, the RF safety standard developed by Subcommittee 4 of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Standards Coordinating Committee SCC-28 was approved by the IEEE Standards Board[7]. (Until 1988 IEEE SCC-28 was known as the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) C95 Committee—established in 1959). In November 1992, the ANSI Board of Standards Review approved the IEEE standard for use as an American National Standard. The limits of this standard are essentially identical to the 1982 ANSI RFPGs[8] for occupational exposure and are one-fifth of these values for exposure of the general public (uncontrolled environments). Like those of the NCRP, these limits resulted from an extensive critical review of the scientific literature by a large committee of preeminently 1 , I PCS Site NY33XC688: Southold,NY-7 qualified scientists, most of whom were from academia and from research laboratories of federal public health agencies. The panels of scientists from the World Health Organization's International Commission on Non- Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP)[9] and the National Radiological Protection Board in the United Kingdom[10] independently developed and in 1993 published guidelines similar to those of ANSI/IEEE. In 1997, after another critical review of the latest scientific evidence, ICNIRP reaffirmed the limits published in 1993[11]. Also, what was formerly the USSR, which traditionally had the lowest exposure guides, twice has revised upward its limits for public exposure. Thus, there is a converging consensus of the world's scientific community as to what constitutes safe levels of exposure. Finally, in implementing the National Environmental Policy Act regarding potentially hazardous RF radiation from radio services regulated by the FCC, the Commission's Rules require that licensees filing applications after January 1, 19972 ensure that their facilities will comply with the 1996 FCC MPE limits outlined in 47 CFR §1.1310[3]3 (which are the same as the 1986 NCRP limits at the frequencies of interest). (Under the terms of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, no local government may regulate the placement of wireless facilities based on RF emissions to the extent that these emissions comply with the FCC regulations [1].) With respect to the proposed PCS, existing Cellular radio, PCS, and ESMR antennas, be assured that the actual exposure levels in the vicinity of the Southold, NY installation will be below any health standard used anywhere in the world and literally thousands of times below any level reported to be associated with any verifiable functional change in humans or laboratory animals. This holds true even when all transmitters operate simultaneously and continuously at their highest power. Power density levels of this magnitude are not even a subject of speculation with regard to an association with adverse health effects. 6. For Further Information Anyone interested can obtain additional information about the environmental impact of Cellular radio, PCS, and ESMR communications from: Dr. Robert Cleveland, Jr. Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering and Technology Room 7002 2000 M Street NW Washington,DC 20554 (202)418-2422 and 2.The FCC extended the transition period to October 15,1997 Second Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,ET Docket 93-62,FCC 97-303,adopted August 25,1997 Prior to this date,the FCC required PCS licensees to comply with the 1992 ANSI/IEEE C95 1 limits and all other licensees(since 1987)to comply with the 1982 ANSI C95 1 limits. 3.Although all FCC licensees will be required to comply with 47 CFR§I 1310 limits,the FCC will continue to exclude certain land mobile services from proving compliance with these limits 47 CFR §1 1307 In the past, although licensees had to comply with the 1982 ANSI C95 1 limits,the FCC categorically excluded land mobile services, including paging, cellular, SMR and two-way radio, from hazard analyses because "individually or cumulatively they do not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment"[121. The FCC pointed out that there was no evidence of excessive exposure to RF radiation during routine normal operation of these radio services. PCS Site NY33XC688: Southold,NY-8 William J. Condon, CHP Chief,Bureau of Environmental Radiation Protection State of New York, Department of Health 2 University Place Albany,NY 12203 (518)458-6495 7. Conclusion This report is an analysis of the RF environment surrounding Sprint's PCS antennas proposed for installation in Southold, NY. The analysis, which includes the contributions from the existing Cellular radio, PCS, and ESMR facilities, utilizes engineering data provided by Sprint PCS together with well-established analytical techniques for calculating the RF fields associated with Cellular radio,PCS, and ESMR antennas. Worst-case assumptions were used to ensure safe-side estimates, i.e., the actual values will be significantly lower than the corresponding analytical values. The maximum level of RF energy associated with each transmitting antenna was compared with the appropriate frequency-dependent exposure limit, and these individual comparisons were combined to ensure that the cumulative RF environment is in compliance with safety guidelines. The results of this analysis indicate that the maximum level of RF energy to which the public may be exposed is below all applicable health and safety limits. Specifically, in all normally accessible areas surrounding the installation, the maximum level of RF energy associated with simultaneous and continuous operation of all proposed and existing transmitters will be less than 2.0% of the safety criteria adopted by the FCC as mandated by the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 is the applicable Federal law with respect to consideration of environmental effects of RF emissions in the siting of personal wireless facilities. The maximum level of RF energy will also be less than 2.0% of the exposure limits of ANSI, IEEE,NCRP,the limits used by the State of New York Department of Health and the limits used by all states that regulate RF exposure. Enclosure: Figure. Electromagnetic Spectrum PCS Site NY33XC688: Southold,NY-9 8. References [1] Telecommunications Act of 1996,Pub. L.No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996). [2] Federal Communication Commission 47 CFR Parts 1, 2, 15, 24 and 97. "Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation"(August 6, 1996) [3] Petersen, R.C., and Testagrossa, P.A., "Radiofrequency Fields Associated with Cellular- Radio Cell-Site Antennas,"Bioelectromagnetics,Vol. 13,No. 6. (1992) [4] Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, NCRP Report No. 86, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda,MD. (1986) [5] Federal Register,Vol. 51,No. 146, Wednesday,July 30, 1986. [6] Notice of Proposed Rule Making In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, August 13, 1993. ET Docket No. 93-62. (1993) [7] ANSI/IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz, ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers,Piscataway,NJ. (1992) [8] American National Standard Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 300 kHz to 100 GHz, ANSI C95.1-1982, American National Standards Institute,New York,NY. (1982) [9] Electromagnetic Fields (300 Hz to 300 GHz), Environmental Health Criteria 137, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. (1993) [10] Board Statement on Restrictions on Human Exposure to Static and Time Varying Electromagnetic Fields and Radiation, Documents of the NRPB, Vol. 4, No. 5, National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton,Didcot, Oxon,United Kingdom. (1993) [11] "Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Time-Varying Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields (up to 300 GHz) - ICNIRP Guidelines," Health Physics, Vol. 74, No. 4, pp 494-522. (1998) [12] Action by the Commission February 12, 1987, by Second Report and Order(FCC 87-63), and Third Notice of Proposed Rulemaking(FCC 87-64). General Docket No. 79-144. PCS Site NY33XC688: Southold,NY- 10 Table 1 Engineering Specifications for the Proposed PCS antennas with Existing Cellular Radio,PCS,and ESMR antennas-Southold,NY Service ESMR Cellular PCS PCS Cellular Site Specifications Nextel § AT&T§ VoiceStream§ Sprint§ Verizon§ maximum ERP per channel t 63 watts — 101 watts 545 watts 505 watts _ 126 watts actual radiated power per channel 5 watts 8 watts 20 watts 16 watts 10 watts actual total radiated power per sector 40 watts 160 watts 40 watts 48 watts 200 watts number of transmitcTx,antennas 4 per sector 4 per sector 2_per sector 3 per sector 4 per sector _number of receive(R4 antennas 4 per sector 4_per sector 2 per sector 2 per sector ^ 4 per sector number of Tx/Rx antennas(duplexed) _ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A maximum number of transmitters 8 per sector 20 per sector 2 per sector 3 per sector 20 per sector number of sectors configured 3 3 3 3 3 antenna centerline height above grade 88 ft 98 ft 62 ft 107.5 ft 78 ft antenna manufacturer Andrew Swedcom EMS Wireless Decibel Products Swedcom model number SMR-08-09011-OD ALP-11011-N RR90-17-00DP DB980H90T2E-M ALP-E-9011 gain_ _ __ 13.15 dBi 13.15 dBi 16.5 dBi 17.15 dBi 13.15 dBi type directional directional directional directional directional downtilt 0° 0° 0° 2°(electrical) 0° §Maximum rated ERP antenna power specifications as used by each service provider(actual ERP antenna power specifications for this site were not used). t Effective Radiated Power -ERP is a measure of how well an antenna concentrates RF energy; it is not the actual power radiated from the antenna. To illustrate the difference,compare the brightness of an ordinary 100 watt light bulb with that from a 100 watt spot-light. Even though both are 100 watts,the spot-light appears brighter because it concentrates the light in one direction. In this direction,the spot-light effectively appears to be emitting more than 100 watts. In other directions,there is almost no light emitted by the spot-light and it effectively appears to be much less than 100 watts. r)CS Site NY33XC688: Southold,NY- 11 Table 2 Calculated Maximal Levels and the Levels as a Percentage of 1996 FCC MPEs*for the Proposed PCS antennas with Existing Cellular Radio,PCS,and ESMR antennas-Southold,NY Power Density(IlyV/cm)...._..._ %of MPEs* ... –1----- -- Provider–Service 6 ft AMGLt I 16 ft AMGLI. 6 ft AMGLt 1 16 ft Sprint–PCSAMGL1- ** <1 187 < 1.460 0.119% 0.146% • Nextel-ESMR ESMR <0.594 <0.770 0.108% 9.140% — VoiceStream–PCS <0.978 1 < 1.449 0.098% 0.145% ... . _ ...._____ _ AT&T-Cellular <1.556 < 1.959 0.283% 0.356% . .._. Verizon-Cellular <3.273 <4.423 0.595% 0.805% Total 1.203% . 1.592% * MPE. The FCC limits for maximum permissible exposure(same as 1986 NCRP limits at the frequencies of interest) t AMGL.above mean grade level **Proposed .'CS Site NY33XC688: Southold,NY- 12 Table 3 Summary of International,Federal,State and Consensus Safety Criteria for Exposure to Radiofrequency Energy at Frequencies Used for Cellular,PCS,and ESMR Radio Systems Exposure Power Density( W/cm2) Organization/Government Agency Population ESMR& PCS Cellular International Safety Criteria/Recommendations International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection(1997) Occu_pational 2062 4875 Health Physics,Vol.74,No.4,pp 494-522. (1998) Public 412 975 National Radiological Protection Board(NRPB, 1993) Occupational 5000 10,000 (United Kingdom) Public 2790 10,000 Federal Requirements Federal Communications Commission(47 CFR§1.1310) _ Occupational 2750 5000 Public 550 1000 Consensus Standards and Recommendations American National Standards Institute(ANSI C95.1 - 1982) Occupational 2750 5000 Public 2750 5000 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Occupational _ 2750 6500 (ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992)4 Public 550 1300 National Council on Radiation Protection&Measurements Occupational 2750 5000 (NCRP Report 86, 1986) Public 550 1000 State Codes New Jersey(NJAC 7:28-42) Public 2750 5000 Massachusetts(Department of Health 105 CMR 122) Public 550 1000 New York States Public 550 1000 NOTES: 1 Reaffirmed in 1997 and published,with modification in 1998 2. The NRPB guidelines have slightly different frequency ranges for their investigation levels. The values shown are the lowest values for the corresponding frequency range. 3 Incorporating IEEE Standard C95 1-1991 and IEEE Standard C95.la-1998 4 State of New York Department of Health follows NCRP Report 86. ELECTROMA GNE TI C SPECTRUM Non-Ionizing Radiation Ionizing Radiation ''i°:�"u L�`�'�u$?f 3r'}S1'.F.7c5f.1,��.ff.�`�fi'�?g� ;{r,irf' ���.r ��l.,�r� :�,�'�$�,' n�:..�4i Si '.i ;v:.ty� iitt."0904,40".r..N,a:+i:..t-.s:{;,•f}t,{t;. -«'�._ ,1�,�.r.},f .,G{..i, �+ ;�"%+!>- i',��at;�r.+,.,c, :x.,.94 ;•i::��:fi";l,'���y',.fr,J''.� �'l'{ •a }. .t.. _ -ri'i"� ;.Y. n:•�.3 i •,a �., �' ;5. yyy,� y.k'. � �i� R ''�� G��.yL)r G.�`,ti}a$,+q:112�.M.,}�ir. ,,.�.4V rA, n .� . �{ C� p- �'��? {N�7�',F U1G:.� �j� '.�\�:�%�,�':"Sf=.1i.,;�}.:;\F�!vF}YI,�'� .�.',�,r �. `�,l'+, '�{';k j� +�„�1Gh �"'Fi. aa•�, r � ' A� d 1,r,5i,� 't•.� .F' p1•'�'�>.^f, x�.�,•,���.a�Ti�t;. y.�.,r4 r,;.�U;dS'?,�'Y.fi'^.,S � :^�� � •� Y7"J.� iX9 ,"fc1ti. 'G• ,,]yF3 "tit•. v:�:' `d' ,�: `. .l��q��. ;'�;5'` �y'S n'61. ,_ C,.., 7 v ,'P' :: I ''a,}, ar ,4 s.� .ru ,x v hf, r rid t,. kg '4,;, t`:� . ••• ' .: ;•• ;%' ',, ,.*.�.�.�, f.q:,�„f4$}-�:t,,, rrt�f .t 'k';� �9�.vf. ,�1•,. X�.N.I'., > ,, .�� };:' }^/,�i <, r ,i�g' ..y� y� i '.!f ',,i. 0,5,,. t !� ,�t .r '' y.s, tN.. .iy�i,;. �. .r � ,,.."7„ �`y �`� tT9+� v .i �r l ,r.� � 1..Sf. �xit ;.t�..l ,i,t�?. ;,W_ ft'�� . , ;'.�.`b�: F„.i,.El..F jua i, •x ":StY•, „ Y1�, ;;a.r 'r �"tT' . of�X'" tom,. :'�.r...��.i:6w:�„„:dt3ilbi+�„•�?n:_ AM Radio: 535- 1605 kHz • Light CB Radio: 27 MHz •,:,Fx:. ,;;;; Cordless Phones: 49 MHz '•, 43i TV Ch 2-6: 54 - 88 MHz c?a K..; - FM Radio: 88 - 108 MHz .''.i-,,7,,, Marine Radio: 160 MHz .'V `t';. TV Ch 7-13: 174 -216 MHz TV UHF Ch 14-69: 470 - 800 MHz Cellular Radio, Specialized Mobile Radio, Paging: 806- 946 MHz Antitheft devices: 10-20 kHz and/or 915 MHz Microwave oven: 915 and 2450 MHz Personal Communication Services: 1800 - 2200 MHz Intrusion alarms / door openers: 10.5 GHz Power Microwave radio: 1 - 40 GHz Frequency Satellite Communications: 100 MHz- 275 GHz I 103 106 109 1012 1015 1018 60 Hz 1 kHz 1 MHz 1 GHz Frequency (Hz) _ i► Lucent Technologies - Proprietary Use pursuant to Company instructions t 4 rt,grt Q4.:sQf ass WO. 1 ,4..Wr Jai AIRSPACE SAFETY `. ANALYSIS CORPORATION ". -Because You Want it Right On The FirstApprooch.' EVALUATION FOR SPRINT PCS ASAC Study Number: STV 22566 99 Date: March 12, 1999 Site ID/Name: Long Island, New York "NY33XC688/ Auto" Lindsey Site Location: Latitude: 40° 59' 56.70" Longitude: 072° 30' 36.10" NAD 83 Site Elevation: 30' AMSL Tower Height: 130' AGL Overall Height: 160' AMSL This study is conducted in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 77 and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Rules Part 17. Two Crown Center 1745 Phoenix Boulevard Suite 120 Atlanta, Georgia 30349 STV 22566 99 770/994-1557 • FAX 770/994-1637 Page 1 asacinc@asacinc.com IMPACT: For regulatory compliance purposes, the nearest landing surface, the approach end of Runway 19 at Mattituck Airbase Airport is located 4,274' (0.70 NM) on a True Bearing of 217.87° from the study site. The airport reference point (ARP) at this public use, VFR only Airport is located 5,204' (0.86 NM) on a True Bearing of 209.30° from the study site. The study site is located below airspace protected for VFR traffic pattern at Mattituck Airbase Airport. The FAA may object to any structure greater than 117' AMSL. The proposed 130' AGL (160' AMSL) structure would exceed FAR 77.13 (a)(2)(ii)by 43' and fail the FCC slope test by 78'.* This exceed, by itself, would require FAA Notice of Proposed Construction. The proposed 130' AGL (160' AMSL) structure located at the study site would not adversely affect VFR or IFR terminal flight operations or procedures established at area airports. The proposed 130' AGL (160' AMSL) structure located at the study site would not adversely affect VFR or IFR en route flight operations or procedures in the area. OPTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The FAA may object to the proposed structure due to new traffic pattern criteria. The new criteria is not applied consistently throughout the FAA. Therefore, ASAC recommends filing notice at 160' AMSL. o FAA Notice is required. Maximum no notice height is 82' AMSL. o Marking and lighting should not be required. o Extended study is not required. Should you have questions regarding this study, its findings, options, or recommendations, please contact ASAC. 6-14/en i\k", .,,,,Atvarl A41,6 k+ mo) pm/6c_ , GcAmelik ) t5o ' N-6-L) re - keAik e S c STV 22566 99 Page 2 Mattituck Site 4, 7 m, %,,,* c Bch og 'S' �O� OLD - 'S1 . - e o1 O �z RS) - O, NG 4� , • J T • O Ot /4Votp ' 't -L T .off Ik''‘ orth • k Country Clue -per g taJtYitA ct P if.. r- 0 O - Q- 7c, o 7 co O •‘,4- -0'it .( ° ° ' 1 r; oz Marra2boka Pon i NEW . _ ' •s o w = 0° M Z O g K -c xQ 73 m z a z < 74 gli O of NEW • D .. osPO\ 9' f1m v moJv3� W ,vo `� ` FR E. ille yOo z N' SUFIOeLg ZC S ' q �4 i impmttituck Airba - {� 0 .• ��— G s ^r tyo..,06bbop ��4, VIIIII.1 IZ •oka Point SFo •`�� m 1997 �: �m�e. Stiee: � :�' , `_ �;A . � T PRQFFSSION 1 . •-, . of N Ew S PR ''a. • r Amble' ' * • <----.'**.' - . . -, ... ,-ct- • PCS _ „._ •--;MATT !TUC K . --8-17,Ei. "In '•••.'::__ .1g. .,. .. . . '---• • . — A' " . r "iii 414-4,104-mm ... . •... ,-... • N-..,;;Am.4.,•••••. IR ow- . _ . . . — t . . tio/P-4:a • , . . :. , -.._•_•••,,,,,,--_,..._—_---„„4.V.;-. --- ... , .. . . . .• ,... . . .,. . ,... ....: , . e 4.., . • - .. N... 14.1. • - — rkt4aT Al . • ....- <'s 4'°- 0 6 ASP° „sill' . . . ..e o ''''' -,.. - •:.. -.. . .. H 0 'S".,.. ''._ 4.-‘, .1.. • _, .... _ .. c,4.,.. 4..,-. .. • D - - .4 1.7'. • -'4,. .4 Q44,,.' P "FESSIO 4"-- 4.1.. it,Lr •-•.; .45 k. . — --1-1?-4• " 1 :• . . ......._ ., , •., . .s. A ,,,- , ...s •. • ..„,.•-i,. . .4._ . '77 7;r,____ . 1 •. ,r .4. !.. .10R.. ....,, • , __,- . ....-.- .. . . .1',L . . -'' , . ,..... : 4. „ . . • l':-:---,..717-,.. •+ ,,... . ; '-' ';': ''/..'":;A, 4'1 .'7,', /....1-•tt- .;, :, .- ' •••... ..4...:.........4, ''''1 iR...s • . tk.."•, ,, . ilil!P• ” - 4 , ' r 4114e i " '344,011 , • ' .......4i _4,1 A , • -,, r . . •. • . 4,'4L-'s'-' ks•-'s 7-r-'•_ , -. ..• .,-. . • 4 - - Ik• h .. .. ' tr Nelik ee.or .. .- • •. J••••• \ . 4•••• . - r. -.c,....4.. J ' •• ' _,.. ...;... of • • *.' \-•-••••:•-•-tN ....•••• , . 4. . .. .... . • ...•. 4. • , ... r•-• •- .- .'it'• \ \ • . .4 .r.y.. '... .,".• — . 1r •.,.., .. .. • - - r• a. • * p I al. , ... --. 1 se•-.. . .3-*•• .'t AA' . . • .. V. ... ,. '... __,... 4%. ‘,.. -....: ---'.A. < .....,,,....,0 • 1"- - ,,•%• x - •-• : - . 4,. ` . ...,,,‘ \ •'71.- . .'1.,%;4 •-T# , - R R , \\ •. \ , • ,,,tkr r. ' 4.- • r . , , '''. .v...., # 1.• -, x 111.:1/ri:_6;..,jm At.. • • . % . . - dk "-,it• , • . ir ,.‘ .., " E - H ''. .'A D '' '.. 4 v-..-- \ t. v. . ,•.-., --: te. . C . • , • l : _•_ • . V ' ...... . \ ......., \ • , C°PYnght(C) 1997 • .' ,MaPtech,inc. - r, s our 11 ,.....:,, ...,.' Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 09/06/00 Receipt#: 2341 Transaction(s): Subtotal 1 Application Fees $400.00 Check#: 2341 Total Paid: $400.00 Name: Baxter Jr, William J 415 Elijahs Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 Clerk ID: LYNDAB Internal ID: 17535 ZONING BOARD OF'APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD : NEW YORK X In the Matter of the Application of AFFIDAVIT SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. OF SIGN POSTING Regarding Posting of Sign upon the Premises: 415 Elijah's Lane Mattituck,NY 11952 1000-108-4-11.3 X COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) I, JAIME OREN, residing at 1040 Commack Road, Dix Hills,New York,being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the 6th day of November, 2000, I personally placed the Town's official Poster, with date of hearing and nature of my application noted thereon, securely upon the premises captioned above, located ten (10) feet or closer from the street or right-of-way(driveway entrance) - facing the street or facing each street or right-of way entrance; and that I hereby confirm that the Poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the subject hearing date, which hearing date was shown to be November 16, 2000. i (:ffAAjri. ---DIAIME OREN Sworn to before me this 13th day of November, 2000. ttk NOTARY P :LIC DOROTHY A. BEARD Notary Public State of New Yak No. 0181:3:031.0.12.y Qualified M Commission Exp7 MUNLEY, MEADE, NIELSEN & RE ATTORNEYS AT LAW REPLY TO:❑ REPLY TO: 160 MIDDLE NECK ROAD 32 WOODBURY ROAD GREAT NECK,NEW YORK 11021 HUNTINGTON,NEW YORK 11743 (516) 487-6500 (631)425-4100 TELECOPIER TELECOPIER (516) 487-6539 (631) 425-4104 November 13, 2000 VIA UPS Chairman Gerald Goeghinger Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 RE: Sprint Spectrum L.P. Application for Variance Premises: 415 Elijah's Lane, Mattituck,New York Dear Chairman Goeghinger: With respect to the captioned application,we enclose the Affidavit of Posting. Thanking you for your courtesies,we remain Very truly yours, MUNLEY, MEADE,NIELSEN&RE By: 2auuence C Re Lawrence C. Re LCR:jm Enclosure T FOR BOARD AND STAFF USE Ygd,.2 L 7 Updated New Information ' 70 21 9-�oA , • - - ,� - 41.7 • --a r r i NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2000 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and Chapter 100 (Zoning), Code of the Town of Southold, the following application will be heard at a public hearing by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971, on THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2000, at the time noted below (or as soon thereafter as possible): 8:00 p.m Appl. No. 4862 — SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P. (Owners: W. Baxter& ors.) — Request for a Variance under Article III, Section 100-33A, based on the Building Department's May 31, 2000 Notice of Disapproval for removal of the existing tower and to construct new wireless communication tower at a height exceeding 20 feet above the average height of buildings within 300 feet of the facility. The height is proposed at 110+- feet from ground. Location of Property: 415 Elijah's Lane, Mattituck; County Tax Map No. 1000-108-4-11.3. Zone District: Limited Business. The Board of Appeals will at the above time and place hear all persons or their representative desiring to be heard or to submit written statements (before the hearing is concluded). This hearing will not start earlier than designated. Files are available for review during regular Town Hall business hours (8-4 p.m.). If you have questions, please do not hesitate to call (631) 765-1809. Dated: October 31, 2000. GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 MUNLEY, MEADE, NIELSEN & RE ATTORNEYS AT LAW REPLY TO:❑ REPLY TO: 160 MIDDLE NECK ROAD OWE\l\;(J(ry` 32 WOODBURY ROAD GREAT NECK,NEW YORK 11021 ((�"J' HUNTINGTON,NEW YORK 11743 (516)487-6500 2 (631) 425-4100 TELECOPIER - /I f�/�!00 TELECOPIER NOV�� LV `f (516) 487-6539 I' (631) 425-4104 November 1,2000 VIA UPS Chairman Gerald Goeghinger Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 RE: Sprint Spectrum L.P. Application for Variance Premises: 415 Elijah's Lane,Mattituck,New York Dear Chairman Goeghinger: With respect to the captioned application,we enclose the following: 1. Affidavit of Mailings with attached list of property owners; 2. Nine (9)U.S. Postal Certified Mail Receipts, dated November 1, 2000; 3. Legal Notice; and 4. Compound Plan. Thanking you for your courtesies,we remain Very truly yours, MUNLEY,MEADE,NIELSEN&RE By: Zaugieiwe C. /fie Lawrence C.Re LCR:jm Enclosures R R ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD : NEW YORK X In the Matter of the Application of AFFIDAVIT SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. OF CTM Parcel #1000-108-4-11.3 MAILINGS X COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) I, JANINE MARCHESE, residing at 43 Calvert Avenue, Commack, New York,being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the 1st day of November, 2000, I personally mailed at the United States Post Office in Huntington,New York,by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a true copy of the attached Legal Notice in prepaid envelopes addressed to current owners shown of the current assessment roll verified from the official records on file with the (X) Assessors, or( ) County Real Property Office , for every property which abuts and is across a public or private street, or vehicular right-of-way of record, surrounding the applicant's property. SEE LIST OF NAMES, ADDRESSES AND LOT NUMBERS ANNEXED HERETO fix';nvnl JANINE MARCHESE Sworn to before me this 1st day of November, 000. _ AaAlta4—L NOTARY PUBLIC EVAMARIE WILSON MOM .tate,New York CONIIIM Nassau County Expires August 1 S, aD0 02 SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. Premises: 415 Elijah's Lane, Mattituck County Tax Map No. 1000-108-4-11.3 Name & Address Tax Map No. Thomas C. & Catherine M. Wilton 1000-108-3-5.6 260 Elijah's Lane Mattituck,NY 11952 Barbara Hofer& Charles Gaetjens 1000-108-3-5.7 P.O. Box 481 Mattituck,NY 11952 Terence E. Matthews 1000-108-3-5.8 RR 1 Box 105C Mattituck,NY 11952 Sonia C. Hunter 1000-108-4-7.3 55 Sundance Drive Cos Cod, CT 06807-1809 Raymond& Sally Neighley 1000-108-4-7.43 27 Case Avenue Patchogue,NY 11772 Janet Oddon 1000-108-4-7.44 315 Rachels Road Mattituck,NY 11952 Joan Patricia Hilliard &Ubaldo Gonzalez 1000-108-4-8 PO Box 248 New Suffolk,NY 11956 William J. Baxter Jr. et al. 1000-108-4-11.2 1030 East Putnam Avenue Greenwich, CT 06830 Dorothy Connelly&Karen Maston 1000-108-4-12 do Roasalie Maston 535 Elijah's Lane Mattituck,NY 11952 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2000 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 287 of the Town Law and Chapter 100 (Zoning), Code of the Town of Southold, the following application will be heard at a public hearing by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971, on THURSDAY. NOVEMBER 18, 2000. at the time noted below(or as soon thereafter as possible): 8:00 p.m. Appl. No. 4862 —SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P. (Owners: W. Baxter&ors.)—Request for a Variance under Article III, Section 100-33A, based on the Building Department's May 31, 2000 Notice of Disapproval for removal of the existing tower and to construct new wireless communication _ tower at a height exceeding 20 feet above the average height of buildings within 300 feet of the facility. The height is proposed at 1101-- feet from ground. Location of Property: 415 Elijah's Lane, Mattituck: County Tax Map No. 1000-108-4-11.3. Zone District: Limited Business. The Board of Appeals will at the above time and place hear all persons or their representative desiring to be heard or to submit written statements (before the hearing is concluded). This hearing will , not start earlier than designated. Files are available for review during regular Town Hall business hours (8-4 p.m.). If you have questions, please do not hesitate to call (631) 785-1809. Dated: October 31, 2000. GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 ��+�} JOB WO #1239 - MATTITUCK- 33-688 Sp1111L SHEET No. SK-1 OF 1 Sprint SpectrumP L. . \/ wir(ess CALCULATED BY J D P DATE 10/03/00 100 HILLTOP ROAD Crossroad:Corpwrote Center 180 WASHINGTON VALLEY ROAD RAMSEY, NJ 07446 1 Mahwah, New JlyJe sey5te.074950 BEDMINSTER, NJ 07921 CHECKED BY P E.P DATE 10/03/00 (201) 934-2828 FAX (201) 934-1181 Phone.(201)512-4713 (908) 306-4046 AS SHOWN SCALE SITE ADDRESS: ELIJAH'S LANE & ROUTE 25, SOUTHOLD, NY LOT: 11.3, BLOCK: 4, SECTION: 108, DISTRICT: 1000 N true (00000 GATE EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED 340 (TYP FOR 3) 17X30'VERIZON PROVIDE SURFACE TREATMENT EQUIPMENT SHELTER WITHIN COMPOUND EXTENSION 110 AND 1'-0"BEYOND 230 0 �y I SPRINT ORIENTATION SPRINT PPC CABINET 160 ..57-1 �yOSV' /it'I` N MID UHTING FIXTURE ONOfRO + 1roe \''' CANOPY OVER + "I s 6.MAPLE 3+7 EQUIPMENT .1141 / EIS ,\rl 6(t s ELECTRIC& i'...- 41, + TELEPHONE AREA 107 227 + C �`+�` WALNBLACK • " \if VERI N I NTATION ``�� � , ` �*. S,pO � UNDERGROUND LNR.OIES EXISTING T OMNIPOINT li \ t9. Cy�Op0Y0J EQUIPMENT ON �• 000 CONCRETE PAD . 4 /0 \� A + y SPRINTIs EQUIPMENT EXIST.UNDERGROUND P ON CONCRETE 0 CABLES IN CONDUIT \ PERS 7'-O HIGH CHAIN-MC \\\FENCE \ EXISTING)0 WATCH \ /♦ ^� PROVIDE POWER FOR r \ FM LIGHTING ps,„;�,p�1�. � ]` S pP0"' \ ELECTRIC SERVICE CONDUITS TO ♦ • RE1ES J N" LIPA SPLICE BOX 0 UTILITY POLE (1r BLE BRIDGE \\\w/5 �, F+�St0C" `A�� ¢\ EXISTING\\\__ 010h1LhT5DxPOLEROUND TELCO l7 f REPLACEMENTM \ MONOPOLE \ APPROXIMATE LOCATION I- \ F UNDERGROUND SPLICE \ \ BOX BY BELL ATLANTIC EXISTING 100E MONOPOLE O�O \ TO BE REMOVED40 c -f PROVIDE NEW CABLE ENTRY PORT +/ EXISTING 6'HIGH CHAIN LINK ON BOTH SIDES OF WALL.MICROFLECT ..------------- MODEL FENCE W/1'OF BARBED WIRE MODEL 81118 O Ox\S`\�`NE�``S-P + \♦E�� \ + EXISTING WHITE ® PINE(EYP.) X f \ EXISTING RED ,A CEDAR(IYP.) COMPOU \D PLAN SCALE: 1"=20' GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 40 80 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. SPRINT SPECTRUM , L .P . HEIGHT VARIANCE REBUILD TELECOM . TOWER 1000- 108 -4 - 11 . 3 ELIJAHS LA . THURS , NOV. 16 , 2000 8 : 00 PM • 11110 OFFICE OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 (631) 765-1809 fax (631) 765-9064 October 31, 2000 1 '16i Re: Chapter 58— Public Notice Requirements — � � '� / ` 3,1a). Dear Applicants: Please find enclosed a copy of the Legal Notice describing your recent application. The Notice will be published in the next issue of the Suffolk Times. Pursuant to Chapter 58 of the Southold Town Code (copy enclosed), formal notice of your application and hearing must be mailed and shall include a map or sketch showing the new location with the setbacks and use noted. Send this Notice CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, within five (5) days of this letter, including a copy of the plot map of this project, to all owners of land (vacant or improved) surrounding yours, including land across any street or right-of-way that borders your property. Use the current addresses shown on the assessment rolls maintained by the Town Assessors' Office (765-1937) or the County Real Property Office in Riverhead. If you know of another address for a neighbor, you may want to send the notice to that address as well. Please submit your Affidavit of Mailing to us after the receipts have been postmarked by the post office. Later, when the green signature cards are returned to you by the Post Office, please mail or deliver them to us. If any signature card is not returned, please advise the Board at the hearing. A town poster is available for posting (by 1117). When picking up the sign, a $15 check will be requested as a deposit. When posting the sign, please place it no more than 10 feet from your front property line bordering the street or main access to your property. (If you border more than one street or roadway, an extra sign is enclosed for the front yard facing each additional street.) The sign(s) must remain in place for at least seven (7) days, and if possible, should remain posted through the day of the hearing. If you need a replacement sign, please contact us. After the signs have been in place for seven (7) days, please submit your Affidavit of Posting to us for the permanent file. If you do not meet the deadlines stated in this letter, please contact us promptly. It may be necessary to cancel your hearing if the required steps are not followed. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, Enclosures ZBA Staff �fiRf§§t@14 iR€RIffIaTI@b POOP NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY, OCTOBER 19, 2000 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and Chapter 100 (Zoning), Code of the Town of Southold, the following application will be held at a public hearing by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971, on THURSDAY, OCTOBER 19, 2000, at the time noted below (or as soon thereafter as possible): 8:00 p.m. Appl. No 4862 — SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P. (Owners: W. Baxter& ors.) — This is a request for a Variance under Article III, Section 100-33A, based on the Building Department's May 31, 2000 Notice of Disapproval for removal of the existing tower and to construct new wireless communication tower at a height exceeding 20 feet above the average height of buildings within 300 feet of the facility. The height is proposed at 110+- feet from ground. Location of Property: 415 Elijah's Lane, Mattituck; County Tax Map No. 1000-108-4-11.3. Zone District: Limited Business. The Board of Appeals will at the above time and place hear all persons or their representative desiring to be heard or to submit written statements (before the hearing is concluded). This hearing will not start earlier than designated. Files are available for review during regular Town Hall business hours (8-4 p.m.). If you have questions, please do not hesitate to call (631) 765-1809. Dated: September 26, 2000. GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 SPRINT SPECTRUM, L .P . HEIGHT VARIANCE REBUILD TOWER 1000- 108 -4- 11 . 3 THURS , OCT . 19 , 2000 8 : 00 PM Page 2 - Minutes Regular Meeting of May 14, 1998 Southold Town Board of Appeals B) NEXTEL/BAXTER - proposed co-location of antennas at Elijah's Lane, Mattituck. Although a former ZBA Resolution adopted 4/30 advertised this application for June 11th hearing, reviews continued regarding applicant's request for a Special Exception based upon a Condition of the former Special Exception issued under 'Cellular One-Metro One.' After a brief discussion, the Board agreed to rescind its former April 30, 1998 Resolution. The Board Secretary was instructed to return the application to applicant, and that applicant should be in a position to make application to the Building Department for any other jurisdictional steps that may be necessary. Based on the Telecommunications Law adopted in November 1997, the Board of Appeals took the position that the new Law supersedes the former Special Exception Condition (which condition stated a requirement for re-application for additional co-locaters). Based on the information furnished and the fact that the proposed newantennas were confirmed to be below the 100-ft. height of the existing, motion was offered by Member Tortora, seconded by Chairman Goehringer, and duly carried, CONFIRMING that an application under the prior special exception is not required and RESCINDING the Board's April 30, 1998 Resolution which had calendared this application for a public hearing. Vote of the Board: Ayes: All (5-0). C) Frank Gaston - proposed deck addition/bulkhead setback va i ce at Bayview Avenue, Southold. jd. June 11 hearing is requeste. , if pos "ble. This agenda item was noted as a new application carryove• b the Chai • an for new review by Members. D) arles Synder - accessory garage location at 7t, Wiggins Lane, Greenport. lt. June 11th hearing is requested, if p.:sible. This agenda item was no -d as a new application carryover by Chairman for new review by Member E) Carl and Lyn - Fritscher - corners "as built" foundation require variances. BP #24539; was issued 10/28 •7. June 11th hearing is requested, if possible. This a• _ da item w: - noted as a new application carryover by the Chairman for new -view b, Members. * * AGENDA ITEM II. PUBLIC H INGS: nless otherwise noted below, each hearing included testimo by the applica't or his agents, statements pro and con, and questio.- from the ZBA, a • then the hearing was concluded/closed. Pleas see Transcript of Hear' • : Statements prepared separately. 6:40 - 6:41 p.m. • ppl. No. 4559 - CHRISTOPHER PLIACO S. the Board reopened the r -aring. Mr. and Mrs. Pliaconis asked the ; •ard if they would wait f. their attorney to arrive, and confirmed the attor - was on his way. • bigail Wickham, Esq. was present representing Mr. a •• Mrs. Hellman d did not object to the 20-minute recess. Motion was ma. - by Chair i,.n Goehringer, seconded by Member Dinizio, and duly carried, to R • SS the hearing for 20 minutes, pending arrival from their Attorney. "earing reconvened at 7:09 p.m. • -17- APPROVAL OF MINUTES, continued: January 11, 1991 Regular Meeting February 1, 1991 Special Meeting. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Grigonis, Dinizio and Villa. This resolution was duly adopted. BOARD REVIEW: MATTER OF THE APPLICATION of CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. d/b/a METRO ONE (Special Exception application was submitted on February 22, 1991 for review and processing) . The Board Members indicated that the use of the proposed telecommunications systems in the LB zone as proposed by the application does not appear to be the intent of the special exception use provided for the AC and LB zones. The application does not indicate whether the applicant is a public utility for this area, whether the applicant is conducting this telecommunications system as a business or other non-profit. The Board also was brought up-to-date on recent in-office communications concerning the need possibly for an interpretation or variance on the height of the principal use structure. The Board authorized and approved the following response (dated March 4, 1991) to the attorney for the applicant, as follows: Dear Mr. Moore: This letter will acknowledge review of your recent Special Exception application left with our office on February 22, 1991. It is our understanding that you do not wish to file the Special Exception application if there is a need for a variance concerning the height of the principal antenna building, which is at approximately 104 feet above average ground level, and that you are in the process of requesting a determination or Notice of Disapproval from the Building Inspector, which has not been furnished with the Special Exception documents. Pursuant to Article XXVI, Section 100-262 of the zoning code, we are returning your Special Exception application forms requesting telecommunications building (antenna) and change of principal use to permit telecommunications for the following reasons: a) Telecommunications is not a use permitted in the Limited Business or Agricultural-Conservation Zone Districts �Ib 2 -18- BOARD REVIEW: MATTER OF THE APPLICATION of CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. d/b/a METRO ONE, continued: (see Light-Industrial-Park/Planned Office Park LIO Zone District regulations) ; b) a written determination by way of a Notice of Disapproval from the Building Inspector concerning conformance or nonconformance with the zoning code has not been furnished as required in the filing of applications to the Board of Appeals, for either a Special Exception or Variance (please see instructions sheet with ZBA form packet and Article XXVI, j Section 100-262A) ; c) a Notice of Disclosure for the applicant-corporations must be provided; d) a Consent from the property owner authorizing the applicant-corporation(s) to file the subject application must be provided. It was noted that the applicant may re-submit the appropriate \- applications as he deems appropriate, and which is under proper jurisdiction of this Board. * * * �• BOARD REVIEW: Application for Interpretation and Variance Re: LIFFSIDE/TIDEMARK. The Board Members indicated th- have review-• this new application, and deems the applicat' as delivere• incomplete. Motion was made by Mr. Din' io, seconded by Mr. Goeh . 'nger, to authorize and send the fo . owing response to the applic. .t's attorney in this regard: "Dear Mr. Haefeli: This letter will 0 firm th- the Board of Appeals has reviewed your recent appl' at' .n and has deemed this application, as delivered, .complete for the following reasons: 1) Article XXVI, Se ion 100-72 - of the Zoning Code dictates authority to the •ard of Appeals `0r . . .A. .peals: to hear and deci. - appeals from and review any order requirement, decision or deter '. ation made by the Buildi. . Inspector; B. Variances: Where there are practi = 1 difficulties 0; unnecessary hardship in the way of carrying ou. the strict August - 8, 1992 -17- Southold Town )ard of Appeals c � rr1 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS 1'�� ��� ' '"Y.: t "`G SCOTT L.HARRIS Gerard P.Goehringer,Chairman• •tax Supervisor �. :-%• E •�,. Town Hall,53095 Main Road Serge Doyen,Jr. ' c9 .�'; �;..;� . •� ' P.O.Box 1179 James Dinizio,Jr. �14D`+ , ���'�� Southold,New York 11971 Robert A.Villa ..•a M .�' o Fax(516)765-1823 Telephone(516)765-1809 Telephone(516)765-1800 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ACTION OF THE BOARD Appl. No. 4022SE. CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY d/b/a METRO ONE. Request for Special Exception approval under Article VIII, Section 100-81B(1) , and Article III, Section 100-31B( 6) for an unmanned telecommunications building in an existing concrete block building and construction of a monopole radio- tower with antenna for transmitting and receiving radio signals to _provide cellular telephone services. Location of Property: 415 Westerly side of •Elijah's Lane, Mattituck, NY; also shown on Planning Board Map of May 15, 1990, Map 8937; Parcel #1000-108-4-11.1 (part of 11) . , WHEREAS, action was taken, after proper notice and public ' hearing, by the Board of Appeals on July 25, 1991 denying the applicant's request for a Special Exception under the "public right-of-way" provision of the residential zone district, and • due to impropriety of the selection of the zone district as it relates to residential uses; • WHEREAS, an Article 78 proceeding was commenced seeking to . reverse and annul the Board's denial of the Special Exception; and on May 28, 1992, a true copy of the court judgment decided by Justice Robert W. Doyle reversing the Board's decision was delivered; and WHEREAS, the time for the Town to appeal this Court decision, as requested, has passed; and WHEREAS, the public utility installations are essential for providing services to the public interest devoting its property and its right-of-way to such public use and service and stands ready to serve all the public; WHEREAS, the public utility company has guaranteed the Town and the unrestricted public of its telecommunications services to the public, • NOW, THEREFORE, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was RESOLVED, that a Special Exception for telecommunication use for utility services directly for public use, as applied under Appl. No. 4022, and re-confirmed at the Board's July 29, 1992 meeting, be and hereby is GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: f4et Page 18- Appl. No. ( `22 Cellular Telephone (Metro One) - August 18, 1992 1. The height of the proposed accessory monopole radio tower shall not exceed 100 feet, as requested; 2. The fall-down radius of the tower shall be as submitted, with the following setback distances: a) 95 feet from the proposed tower to the northerly property line; b) 70 feet+- from the proposed tower to the southerly property line; c) 69 feet from the rear wall of the accessory one-story block building. 3. Any future expansion for the storage of the telecommunications equipment to areas outside of the existing one-story block building located in the rear yard will require further application for Special Exception consideration; and 4. In the event this transmission tower becomes obsolete or its use is discontinued for the telecommunications purposes �Y requested in this application, the tower shall be removed within three months of its obsolescence, and it shall be the k ° responsibility of the owner, subsequent owners, successors, assigns, and/or the applicant herein to comply with this condition, at their own expense; and 5. No other structures, buildings, or uses shall occupy or be located on the premises unless further application is made to this Board under this Special Exception, as well as the Planning Board under the site plan regulations, in order to re-consider . all zoning standards, including safety, health, and welfare standards and concerns; and 6. Lighting shall be placed near the top of the tower for aircraft safety purposes; and 7. Appropriate screening and site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board for this Limited Business (LB) Zone District; . 8. Written covenants and restrictions shall be submitted in recordable form; and after acceptance by the Town, the original shall be recorded by the applicant in the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk and a copy of same furnished with the Office of the Board of Appeals. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen and • c • . Page 19 Appl. No. 4022 - Cellular Telephone (Metro One) Decision Rendered August 18, 1992 Villa. (Member Dinizio abstained. ) This resolution was duly adopted with a quorum vote of the Board. * * lk * GERARD P. GOEHEINGER, C IRMAN • • • • • • • • • • -` r August 18, 1992 -20- Southold Town yard of Appeals Vroiter APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS et°' `<��� SCOTT L. HARRIS Gerard P.Goehringer,Chairman � - ± y x Supervisor v. °"Y+= l `;' ? Town Hall,53095 Main Road Serge Doyen,Jr. • O = ;.;; ' ti� �� James Dinizio,Jr. ;6,4„ : P.O.Box 1179 Robert A.Villa =- 1 ._' s,t) ; Southold,New York 11971 • Fax (516)765-1823 Telephone(516)765-1809 Telephone(516)745-1800 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ACTION OF THE BOARD Appi. No. 4023 . CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. d/b/a METRO ONE. This is an Appeal of the March 14, 1991 Notice of Disapproval issued by the Building Inspector for an Interpretation under Article XXIII, Section 100-230 concerning a proposed 104 ft. height of a monopole structure for radio transmission, and in the alternative, appellant requests a variance from the height restriction. Location of Property: (#415) Westerly side of Elijah's Lane and the Northerly Side of the Main Road (NYS Route 25) , Mattituck, NY; also shown on Planning Board subdivision-approved map of May 15, 1990; property now or formerly of William J. Baxter and Others; County Tax Map Parcel ID No. 1000-108-4-part of 11. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on July 29, 1992, at which time all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; WHEREAS, Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. This is an application for an Interpretation as authorized by Section 100-271(d) {1} of the zoning code appealing • the March 14, 1991 Notice of Disapproval issued by the Building Inspector which states as follows: ". . .PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application dated March 14, 1991 for permit to construct radio tower and structure . . . is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: Article VII, Section 100-81B site plan approval required by Planning Board & Special Exception required by Zoning Board of Appeals, ) r l Page 21 - Appl. No. 4023 Decision Rendered August 18, 1992 Matter of CELLULAR TELEPHONE (METRO ONE) Section 100-230 on height exceptions may require interpretation by Zoning Board of Appeals. . . . I' 2. Proposed in this project is the placement of an accessory telecommunications (radio transmission) tower in the rear yard area at premises known as 415 Elijah's Lane, Mattituck, identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 108, Block 4, Lot #11.3 consisting of 1.85 acres. 3. The subject premises is owned by William Baxter, Jr. and others, and the applicant is the tenant, Cellular Telephone Company, a New York General Partnership (d/b/a Metro One) . 4. The use of the proposed accessory tower and the rear concrete building for public telecommunications purposes has also been conditionally approved by Special Exception Appl. No. 4022, and the following information is noted for the record: (a) Cellular One is a public utility under the Laws of the State of New York and holds a franchise from the Federal Communications Commission to serve the public within the Town of Southold; (b) Cellular One's FCC Franchise requires that Cellular One provide cellular telephone service within the geographic boundaries of the Town of Southold, providing a quality service consistent with the requirements of the Public • Service Commission; (c) Cellular Telephone Co. will conduct mobile communications by radio consisting of mobile units either mounted in vehicles or hand-carried sending to and receiving signals from fixed base sites. Different frequencies are set between cells, and good overlap between cells will permit a better grade of service. Movement to outside of the range of the cell, would cause weaker coverage, and when a cell is missing, coverage is not uniform and service can drop. (See the sworn affidavit of Scott Fox, Director of Engineering for the applicant/company dated July 29, 1992 in which the steps in determining the necessary height of the antenna for a cell site are provided in detail) ; 5. The structure which is the subject of this application is a 100 ft. high pole-type structure (96 ft. pole plus attached four-ft. high, 12-ft. wide antenna at the top) as shown on the construction diagram prepared by Juengert/Grutzmacher Architects, submitted July 27, 1992. This structure is free—standing (separate and detached from . any other buildings ) . • Page 22 - Appl. No. 4023 Decision Rendered August 18, 1992 Matter of CELLULAR TELEPHONE (METRO ONE) 6. Section 100-33 of the Zoning Code specifically provides a height limitation at 18 feet for accessory structures. This restriction is applicable to the Limited Business and Agricultural-Conservation Zone Districts. 7. Height restrictions have always been less than 35 feet for principal structures, and 18 feet or less for accessory structures since the inception of zoning in April 1957. 8. During January 1989, a subsection was added for certain height exceptions under Section 100-230D, for: (1) Spires, belfries, cupolas and domes not for human occupancy; and monuments, transmission towers, chimneys, derricks, conveyors, flagpoles, radio towers, television towers and television aerials, provided that any television or radio aerial shall not be located nearer than a distance equal to its height above the roof or other permanent structure to which it is attached to any overhead electric transmission line carrying more than two hundred twenty (220) volts. (2) Bulkheads, observation towers, monitors, fire towers, hose towers, cooling towers, water towers, grain elevators or other structures where a manufacturing process requires greater height, provided that any such structures that are located on any roof and that exceed in height the limits in the particular district shall not in the aggregate occupy more than twenty percent (20%) . 9. It is, and has been the opinion of this Board, since the inception of zoning in 1957, that a structure which is free-standing and is not attached to the top of a building such as those excepted in Section 100-230D are clearly governed by the 18 ft. height provision of Section 100-33. See the Limited Business Zone District, Article VIII, Section 100-81(C1) , which reads as follows: C. (Amended 5-9-89 by L.L. No. 6-1989) . Accessory Uses. The following uses are permitted as accessory uses and, except for the residential accessory uses and signs, which are governed by Article XX, are subject to site plan review: Page 23 - Appl. No. 4023 Decision Rendered August 18, 1992 Matter of CELLULAR TELEPHONE (METRO ONE) (1) Any accessory use as set forth in and regulated by Section 100-31C(1) through (8) . . . , and subject to the conditions set forth in Section 100-33 thereof. . . " ; Section 100-11 does provide that where a provision or requirement which is more restrictive or which establishes the higher standard shall govern. 10. It is also the opinion of this Board that this structure .does not fall under Section 100-230D which applies to television or radio towers or aerials attached to a permanent structure (such as CB, ham radio, TV antennas, and the like) accessory to the principal building and principal use of the property. •It is this Board's position that the subject pole tower is not a roof-type antenna and is deemed a separate, .accessory structure. Accessory structures are governed by Section 100-33 in the Limited Business Zone District; and WHEREAS, public utilities have always been recognized by I the Town to provide essential, unrestricted telecommunications services to and for the public, over, on and through its rights-of-way and its land; NOW, THEREFORE, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was RESOLVED, that it is the Interpretation of this Board that the height restriction under Section 100-81C(1) and Section 100-33 of the zoning code is applicable for all types of accessory structures, including those intended for telecommunications and other permitted accessory uses; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a variance for a total height as requested of 100 feet for an accessory monopole telecommunications tower to provide utility services directly to • and for public use, as applied under Appl. No. 4023 , be and hereby is GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The height of the proposed accessory monopole tower shall not exceed 100 feet, as requested, and shall not exceed the structural dimensions shown on the plan prepared by .Juengert/Grutzmacher Architects dated 1-26-91, Job Number 9037-174 (unless necessary and approved for safety purposes) ; 2. The fall-down radius of the tower shall be "as submitted" with the following setback distances: Page 24- Appl. No. 4uz3 Decision Rendered August 18, 1992 Matter of CELLULAR TELEPHONE (METRO ONE.) • a) 95 to 103 feet to the northerly property line; b) 69 to 62 feet from the proposed tower to the southerly property line and radius clearance of approximately 40 feet past the southerly property line over onto adjoining property to the south, also owned by William J. Baxter; c) 62+- feet to 69 feet from the rear wall of the accessory one-story block building. 3. Any future expansion for the storage of the telecommunications equipment to areas outside of the existing one-story block building located in the rear yard will require further application for Special Exception consideration; and the tower and equipment building must be continuously maintained in good condition at all times; 4. In the event this transmission tower becomes obsolete .or its use is discontinued for the telecommunications purposes requested in this application, the tower shall be removed within three months of its obsolescence, and it shall be the responsibility of the owner, subsequent owners, successors, assigns, and/or the applicant herein tocomply with this condition, at their own expense; and 5. No other structures, buildings, or uses shall occupy or be located on the premises unless further application is made to this Board under this Special Exception, as well as to the Planning Board under the site plan regulations, in order to re-consider this Special Exception and all other zoning standards, including safety, health, and welfare standards and concerns; and 6. Lighting shall be placed near the top of the tower for aircraft safety purposes; and - 7. No excessive (disturbing) noise levels; 8. Monitoring shall be as per FCC mandates; 9. Appropriate screening and site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board for this Limited Business (LB) Zone District; 10. Written covenants and restrictions shall be submitted ,in recordable form; and after acceptance by the Town, the original shall be recorded by the applicant in the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk and a copy of same furnished with the Office of the Board of Appeals. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen and Page 25 - Appl. No. 4023 Decision Rendered August 18, 1992 Matter of CELLULAR TELEPHONE (METRO ONE) • Villa. (Member Dinizio abstained. ) This resolution was duly adopted with a quorum vote of the Board. lk GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAI • 11 1 1 1 CORPORATION 271 North Avenue, Suite 711 PO Box 1620, New Rochelle. NY 10802-1620 Phone 914-576-6530 • Fax: 914-576-0576 sC COR PORATION® ENGINEERING REPORT SUMMARY OCTOBER 10, 2000 THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED AND SIGNED BY LOUIS G. CORNACCHIA, BEE, PRESIDENT EVALUATION OF RADIO EMISSIONS FROM THE PROPOSED SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE ANTENNA INSTALLATION (SITE-NY33XC688) FOR A INTEGRATED WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK, TO BE MOUNTED TO A REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE, TO BE LOCATED ON BLOCK 4, LOT 11.3, SECTION 108, ELIJAH'S LANE & RT 25, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK. 271 North Avenue, Suite 711 A PO Box 1620, New Rochelle NY 1 0802-1 620 Phone 914-576-6530 SCINE'I'15 O Fax 914-576-0576 N C OR POR A T ION Mr. Ed Yorke, Sr. RF Engineer Sprint Telecommunications Venture Crossroads Corporate Center 1 International Boulevard Mahwah, New Jersey 07495 Subject: Evaluation of Radio Emissions from a proposed Sprint Spectrum L.P. Personal Communications Service (PCS) Antenna Installation (Site #NY33XC688) for a Integrated Wireless Communications Network, to be mounted to a proposed replacement Monopole, to be located on Block 4, Lot 11.3, Elijah's Lane & Rt. 25, Southold, New York. Attn.: Ed Yorke As per the applicant's request, Sprint Spectrum, enclosed please find: An analysis of findings and conclusions prepared by SCINETICS Corporation, Staff Engineers on the following: 1. Power Density of the combined field at the point where it is at it's maximum strength and concurrently at the closest point to the source, Sprint Spectrum L.P. Personal Communications Service (PCS) Antenna Installation and at radial distances of 6, 70, 250, 500, 1000 and 2000 feet from the PCS Transmitting Antenna, where people can be. 2. Calculated levels compared to allowable EMF continuous Exposure levels as per ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992/NCRP, Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Continuous Exposure Standards, OSHA and the NYDOT B SUMMARY This report is the result of an extensive study of Electromagnetic Field Intensities (EMF - Power Densities) emitted by the Proposed Sprint Spectrum L.P. PCS Antenna Installation (Site #NY33XC688) for a Integrated Wireless Communications Network, to be mounted to a proposed replacement Monopole, to be located on Block 4, Lot 11.3, Elijah's Lane & Rt. 25, Southold, New York. The study incorporated the most conservative considerations to determine practical combined worst case Power Densities contributed by the proposed Sprint PCS, Nextel, and Verizon antennas, as well as existing AT&T and Omnipoint relocated antennas, the Southold community could encounter. CONCLUSIONS The Power Densities emitted by the proposed PCS Radio Antenna Facility are many orders of magnitude below the Health Standards adopted or proposed in the United States and any Health Standard used anywhere in the world. The issue of EMF compliance is pre-empted from the municipality regulatory powers beyond the applicants stating that it has examined the emissions in accordance with "OET Bulletin No. 65 - Edition 97- 01, August 1997" and that the applicant is in compliance with the newly adopted FCC MPE/NCRP of 1000 microwatts/cm. sq. residential or "uncontrolled environment" Standard. Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 states that; " No State or local government or instrumentality thereof, may regulate the placement, construction and modification of personal wireless services facilities on the basis of environmental effects of radio frequencies emissions to the extent that such Facilities complies as to the Commissions (FCC) Regulations concerning such emissions". The results of this theoretical worst case safety analysis clearly indicate that the EMF levels attributed to the emissions caused by the proposed PCS Facility, will be far below EMF continuous Exposure levels as per ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991* (49 CFR 1.1310), Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Continuous Exposure Standards, OSHA, 1986 NCRP and the NYDOH. The emissions broadcast from the Sprint Spectrum transmitters are in the non-ionizing 1950-1965 MHz C frequency band, a band previously assigned to Fixed/Mobile communications. Presently the FCC has assigned these same frequencies in the 1950-1965 MHz band to the PCS Industry, capable of transmitting at power levels of 200 Watts ERP. This Frequency band has in fact been a part of the EMF environment for over forty years. The EMF levels attributed to the emissions caused by the PCS Broadcast Systems are well below applicable EMF Standards which in the Scientific consensus based on overwhelming evidence, are well below threshold effects. The derived Standards have added safety limits to the threshold levels. When EMF levels encountered are at or below the Standard, no health effects occur, therefore no cumulative effect is possible regardless of exposure duration. This analysis and the results of this analysis assumes an antenna power output of two hundred (200) Watts ERP per channel. The theoretical maxima of combined RF emissions, resulting from the proposed Sprint Spectrum L.P. PCS Installation, to which the public (non-occupational) is exposed to in and around normally accessible areas surrounding the PCS antenna installation and the Southold community, is far below the strictest continuous exposure limit legislated and proposed in the United States. Specifically, the theoretical maximum levels of RF energy (see Table II) resulting from the simultaneous and continuous operation of all combined Sprint Spectrum L.P. PCS Radio Facility transmitting antennas are less than one (1) microwatt/cm. sq.. The EMF levels are thousands of times below the Maximum Permitted Exposure limits (MPE) proposed by 1982 ANSI, 1992 ANSI/IEEE, NCRP and the MPE criteria of all states that regulate Radio Frequency Installations and meets the safety criteria specified by the FCC in accordance with the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The theoretical highest combined** emissions from all proposed herein named carriers the Southold community could be exposed to at an elevation of 16 feet above ground. at any point in the Southold community - Combined EMF = 1.522%. a total far below the permitted 100.0% allowed by a factor of 65. ( See Table IIA-1) D (Note: Future co-locating carriers must complete an FCC Compliance analysis, including the proposed carrier Emissions as determined herein, [if this application is approved], showing cumulative EMF emissions impact.) These EMF levels and all other levels presented in Table II, IIA, IIB, IIC, and IID are theoretical maximas that could occur only under worst case events, assuming conditions such as in phase reflections occurring steady state, all transmitters operating simultaneously and continuously and excluding resistance or attenuating characteristics of construction material used in homes, schools and other similar structures. In reality, actual field measurements continually provide readings of power density levels far lower than the more conservative analytical levels indicated. The Telecommunications act of 1996, is the applicable Federal Law with respect to consideration of environmental effects of RF emissions in the siting of PCS Radio facilities. It is the conclusion of this report, that the proposed Sprint Spectrum L.P. PCS application meets the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) present criteria and the FCC criteria as it is effected by the Telecommunications act of 1996, with respect to environmental considerations of RF emissions. Furthermore, Mobile PCS Radio Frequency Bands do not interfere with television reception, telephones or radio reception due to the wide separation of the Broadcast Bands as licensed and regulated by the FCC. (See Table I) ANALYSIS This critical analysis* incorporated PCS Radio antenna emission characteristics and included the following assumptions which exceed realistic conditions of operations, but will yield worst case EMF - Power Densities ordinarily not realized and never exceeded. 1. All antennas are located at the lowest elevation indicated in the construction drawing to absorb errors in actual locations and to bring the antenna cluster closer to facilities and citizens than would normally be the case. 2. All antennas will be transmitting continuously, 24 hours a day. 3. All channels will be communicating simultaneously. 4. Power levels emitting from the antennas are increased by a factor of 4.0 to take into account possible in - phase reflections 1 E at any point in the Southold community, which is rarely the case, and if so, are never continuous. 5. At all distances greater than 2000 feet, the Power Densities decrease by a factor of four (4) with every doubling of distance. The PCS Installation in question is an assembly of low power antennas that emits radio energy at levels 100 to 1000 times below those of Commercial Broadcast Antennas. Given the distances between the antennas studied in this report and the Southold community field points in question, as well as the overall Southold community, the densities of the radio energy are extremely low. * Reference Basis for calculations: 1 - "Evaluating Compliance With FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields. OET Bulletin No. 65 -Edition 97-01 " 2 - Copies of data, sketches and specifications submitted by Sprint Spectrum L.P. are the basis for our studies, calculations and analysis EMF STANDARDS REVIEW - The U.S. Congress adopted "The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969" (NEPA) which required all government agencies to take into account the potential environmental impact of their actions. The agencies had to consider whether their actions significantly affect the "the quality of the human environment". To implement this mandate, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted rules covering the NEPA in licensing and approving facilities and operations under its jurisdiction. Rules adopted were codified in the code of Federal Regulations, Part 1, Subpart I, of the FCC Rules and Regulations. Facilities or operations specified must provide information assessing the environmental effect of their proposal. In the case of RF radiation, the environmental effect would be the relative health risk to people living or working near or at the facility in question. The FCC was required by NEPA to make a determination as to whether the facilities or operations it approves may significantly affect the human environment with regard to the emission of RF radiation. As there was no federal standard for exposure to RF radiation, the FCC chose to rely upon a recognized non-government standard. The FCC selected the "American National Standard Safety i F Level With Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, "300 KiloHertz (kHz) to 100 GigaHertz (GHz)" prepared by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) in 1982. The protection guides recommended by ANSI were the guidelines the FCC has identified for using in evaluating environmental significance with respect to Human Exposure to RF Radiation. The FCC adopted rules which required preparation of environmental assessment if the particular facility or operation would cause exposure of workers or the general public to levels of radio frequency radiation in excess of the ANSI protection guides. The rule is contained in 47 CFR 1.1307(d). That rule applied to facilities or operations licensed or authorized under the following parts of the Commission's Rules, 5,21 Subpart K), 25, 73, 74 (Subparts A, G, I, and L), and 80. The facilities and operations licensed or authorized under all other parts, subparts or sections of the Commissions Rules were categorically excluded from consideration. In 1986 the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Sub-Committee SC-53, published recommended limits for occupational and public exposure (NCRP - "Biological effects and exposure criteria for radio frequency electromagnetic fields." NCRP Report No. 86, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, Maryland). Sub-Committee SC-53 independently retained Radiation Frequency Protection Guidelines (RFPGs) similar to those of the 1982 ANSI Standard but with one notable exception: two tiers appear, one for occupational exposure and one for exposure of the general public. The results of the studies, carefully analyzed, proposed exposure levels of approximately 5000 microwatts per centimeter square (at 1950) MegaHertz (MHz) frequencies) for continuous occupational exposure and approximately 1000 microwatts per centimeter square for continuous exposure of the public sector is used in the comparative analysis herewith. In 1990, Sub-Committee IV (SC-IV of C95), formed by the IEEE using rigid selection criteria for their studies and critical reviews, recommended two tiers (NCRP) but with differences in rational. ANSI soon accepted the recommendations of IEEE Sub-Committee IV and the recommendations were proposed, adopted and termed ANSI - IEEE C95.1 - 1992. 3 TABLE IIB EMF LEVELS IN MICROWATTS/CM.SQ. ELIJAH'S LANE & RT 25-SITE #NY33XC688 SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK Existing Lower than the 1996 Lower than the 1996 AT&T Telecommunications Telecommunications Field Points Combined Act/ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991 Act/ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991 Antenna Resident'1/Cont.Exposure(550) Occupation/Cont.Exposure(2750) Emissions by a factor of by a factor of Point 1 0.388 1400 7000 R=10'-Base of Monopole Elev. - 6' Point 2 0.914 600 3000 R=70'-Nearest residential property line-Elev. - 16' Point 3 0.164 3300 16000 R=250'- Other homes Elev. - 16' Point 4 1.760 300 1500 R=500'- Southold community Elev. -16' Point 5 0.892 600 3000 R=1000'-Southold community Elev. -16' Point 6 0.282 1900 9500 R=2000'-Southold community Elev. - 16' Note: N/A=factor over 100000 G The Telecommunications Act of 1996, Public Law 104-104- February 8, 1996 recommended adoption of portions the ANSI - IEEE C95.1 - 19 1/NCRP Standards, and in August of 1996, the FCC did adopt the ANSI - IEEE C95.1 - 1991 two tier Standards, to be implemented on applications beginning September 1, 1997. The Power Densities emitted by the proposed PCS Radio Communications Antenna Installation base station are many orders of magnitude below the Health Standards adopted or proposed in the United States and any Health Standard used anywhere in the world. The attached photograph indicating acceptable EMF emissions from various household appliances provides a further perspective for better understanding the EMF levels encountered in this summary. For additional information addressing the environmental impact of EMF Emissions please refer to the section in the report titled "References" which provides current names of agencies, contact personnel and phone numbers. Frequency Bands - According to most authorities, microwave (MW) frequencies cover the approximate band from 900 MegaHertz (MHz) to 300 GigaHertz (GHz). One MegaHertz (MHz) is a million cycles and One GigaHertz (GHz) is a billion cycles per second. Table I lists several other communication and interrogation frequencies used in the United States. Clearly, a large fraction of commercial and private telecommunication involves MW Frequencies. TABLE I (Some Frequency Definitions) Type of System Frequency Interval FM Radio 88 MHz to 108 MHz VHF TV 174 MHz to 216 MHz UHF TV 470 MHz to 806 MHz Mobile Radio Telephone/PCS 806 MHz to 2.0 GHz Typical Radar Systems 200 MHz to 3.0 GHz H The Principal Features Of The Proposed Installation And The Assumptions Considered In The Analysis Are As Follows: a) The proposed Sprint Spectrum L.P. (PCS) radio antennas will be mounted to a proposed replacement Monopole as indicated by the Sprint Spectrum LLC drawings. The elevation from the centerline of the proposed Sprint antennas to the base of the Monopole will be approximately 107.5 feet. The closest a person can approach the transmitting antenna is 101.5 feet. This assumes a 6 foot tall person, with the distances being measured from the top of that person's head at the base of the Monopole, to the centerline on the antenna panel in question. b) The antenna array will consist of three (3) Sectors, three (3) Directional type antenna (DB980H90T2E-M) in each sector, for transmission and receive. The physical arrangement of these antennas is illustrated in drawings given by Sprint Spectrum L.P.. (Assumed 2 degree downtilt for this analysis.) c) The maximum number of channels that will be assigned to the antenna array, in any direction, will not exceed three (3). The power from the transmitting antennas for each of the three channels in each sector, will not exceed 200 Watts, ERP. The radio transmissions could be at frequencies between 1950 and 1965 MegaHertz. Maximum power from the transmitting Sprint Spectrum L.P. (PCS) Antenna, in any direction could be 600 Watts, ERP, assuming all Channels are transmitting simultaneously. d) It was assumed that the elevation of the Southold community within a radius of 2000 feet from the PCS Antenna perimeter is equal to the elevation at the base of the Monopole, with exceptions as noted in Table II. e) All field points are at Radial distances indicated from the base of the Monopole where the vertical line of PCS Transmitting antenna intersects. I f) The proposed and existing Carriers co-located on the proposed replacement Monopole including transmitting data, are as follows: Sprint (proposed) Maximum ERP/Channel 505 watts ERP Number of Channels/sector 3 Number of Sectors 3 Number of Transmit/Receive Antennas/Sector 3 Antenna centerline height above grade 107.5 feet Antenna Model- DB980H90T2E-M Directional-Gain= 11 dBd Frequency of transmission- 1950 MHz Maximum continuous residential Exposure- 1000 microwatts/cm.sq. VERIZON (proposed) Maximum ERP/Channel 126 watts ERP Number of Channels/sector 2 0 Number of Sectors 3 Number of Transmit/Receive Antennas/Sector 4 Antenna centerline height above grade 78 feet Antenna Model- ALP9011E Directional-Gain= 13.15 dBi Frequency of transmission- 850 MHz Maximum continuous residential Exposure- 550 microwatts/cm.sq. AT&T (existing) Maximum ERP/Channel 101 watts ERP Number of Channels/sector 2 0 Number of Sectors 3 Number of Transmit/Receive Antennas/Sector 4 Antenna centerline height above grade 98 feet Antenna Model- ALP11011-N Directional-Gain= 13.15 dBi Frequency of transmission- 850 MHz Maximum continuous residential Exposure- 550 microwatts/cm.sq. NEXTEL (proposed) Maximum ERP/Channel 63 watts ERP Number of Channels/sector 8 Number of Sectors 3 Number of Transmit/Receive Antennas/Sector 4 Antenna centerline height above grade 88 feet Antenna Model-SMR-08-09011-OD Directional-Gain= 11 dBd Frequency of transmission- 850 MHz Maximum continuous residential Exposure- 550 microwatts/cm.sq. J OMNIPOINT (existing) Maximum ERP/Channel 545 watts ERP Number of Channels/sector 2 Number of Sectors 3 Number of Transmit/Receive Antennas/Sector 2 Antenna centerline height above grade 63 feet Antenna Model- EMS RR90-17-00DP Directional-Gain= 14,4 dBd Frequency of transmission- 1930 MHz Maximum continuous residential Exposure- 1000 microwatts/cm.sq. K TABLE IIA-1 EMF LEVELS IN MICROWATTS/CM.SQ./PERCENTAGE OF STANDARDS PROPOSED SPRINT MONOPOLE INSTALLATION ELIJAH'S LANE &RT. 25, SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK Field Point-Any point of community Antenna System Elevation Power Standard Calculated Percent of Feet WERP FCC/NCRP EMF Density Standard Residential SPRINT SPECTRUM LLC. (9) - 1950 MHz (Proposed) 107 505 1000 0.642 0.064 VERIZON (12) - 1950 MHz (Proposed) 78 126 550 6.456 1.173 AT&T (12) - 850 MHz (Existing) 98 101 550 0.914 0.166 NEXTEL.(12) - 850 MHz (Proposed) 88 63 550 0.178 0.032 OMNIPOINT (6) - 860 MHz (Existing) 63 5 4 5 1000 0.871 0.087 Total Percentage Of All Antenna Sources 1.522 % NOTE: 1 . N/A is less than 0.001. 2. Unless Indicated - Total Percentage of All Antenna Sources = less than 0.01%. 3. WERP - power output per channel ** EMF emissions contributed by transmitting antennas in differing frequency bands are regulated by MPE Standards for the specific bands in which the emissions are analyzed. When adding the emissions resulting from transmissions in differing frequency bands, the resulting percentages of the emissions compared to the governing MPE standards are added. Per the FCC, percentages of EMF Density levels of applicable Standards, as specified by the FCC OET Bulletin No. 65 Edition 97.01, are addressed as follows: "Therefore, in mixed or broad band fields, where a number of different frequencies are involved, the contributing of all RF sources must be considered. When different limits are recommended for different frequencies, the fraction of (or percentages) the limit incurred within each frequency interval should be determined, and the sum of all such fractions (or percentages) should not exceed 1.0 (or 100 percent)" See section 4,1 in Appendix A). 1 TABLE II EMF LEVELS IN MICROWATTS/CM.SQ. ELIJAH'S LANE & RT 25-SITE #NY33XC688 SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK Proposed Lower than the 1996 Lower than the 1996 SPRINT Telecommunications Telecommunications Field Points Combined Act/ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991 Act/ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991 Antenna Resident'I/Cont.Exposure Occupation/Cont.Exposure(5000) Emissions (1000)by a factor of by a factor of Point 1 0.330 3000 15000 R=10'-Base of Monopole Elev. - 6' Point 2 0.642 1500 7500 R=70'-Nearest residential property line-Elev. - 16' _ Point 3 0.192 5000 25000 R=250'- Other homes Elev. - 16' Point 4 0.520 1900 9000 R=500'- Southold community Elev. -16' Point 5 0.424 2300 11000 R=1000'-Southold community Elev. -16' Point 6 0.212 4700 23000 R=2000'-Southold community Elev. - 16' Note: N/A =factor over 100000 2 TABLE IIA EMF LEVELS IN MICROWATTS/CM.SQ. ELIJAH'S LANE & RT 25-SITE #NY33XC688 SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK Proposed Lower than the 1996 Lower than the 1996 VERIZON Telecommunications Telecommunications Field Points Combined Act/ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991 Act/ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991 Antenna Resident'l/Cont.Exposure(550) Occupation/Cont.Exposure(2750) Emissions by a factor of by a factor of Point 1 2.713 200 1000 R=10'-Base of Monopole Elev. - 6' Point 2 6.456 85 400 R=70'-Nearest residential property line-Elev. - 16' Point 3 0.192 2800 14000 R=250'- Other homes Elev. - 16' Point 4 0.520 1000 5000 R=500'- Southold community Elev. -16' Point 5 0.424 1200 6000 R=1000'-Southold community Elev. -16' Point 6 0.212 2500 12 000 R=2000'-Southold community Elev. - 16' Note: N/A=factor over 100000 4 TABLE TIC EMF LEVELS IN MICROWATTS/CM,SQ, ELIJAH'S LANE & RT 25-SITE #NY33XC688 SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK Proposed Lower than the 1996 Lower than the 1996 NEXTEL Telecommunications Telecommunications Field Points Combined Act/ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991 Act/ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991 Antenna Residenti/Cont.Exposure(550) Occupation/Cont.Exposure(2750) Emissions by a factor of by a factor of Point 1 0.148 3700 18000 R=10'-Base of Monopole Elev. - 6' Point 2 0.178 3000 15000 R=70'-Nearest residential property line-Elev. - 16' Point 3 0.420 1300 6500 R=250'- Other homes Elev. - 16' Point 4 0.697 780 3900 R=500'- Southold community Elev. -16' Point 5 0.280 1900 9500 R=1000'-Southold community Elev. -16' Point 6 0.070 7800 39000 R=2000'-Southold community Elev. - 16' Note: N/A=factor over 100000 5 TABLE IID EMF LEVELS IN MICROWATTS/CM.SQ. ELIJAH'S LANE & RT 25-SITE #NY33XC688 SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK Existing Lower than the 1996 Lower than the 1996 Omnipoint Telecommunications Telecommunications Field Points Combined Act/ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991 Act/ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1991 Antenna Resident7/Cont.Exposure Occupation/Cont.Exposure(5000) Emissions (1000)by a factor of by a factor of Point 1 0.551 1800 9000 R=10'-Base of Monopole Elev. - 6' Point 2 0.871 1100 5500 R=70'-Nearest residential , property line-Elev. - 16' Point 3 0.950 1000 5000 R=250'- Other homes Elev. - 16' Point 4 0.806 1200 6000 R=500'- Southold community Elev. -16' Point 5 0.600 1600 8000 R=1000'-Southold community Elev. -16' Point 6 0.152 6500 32000 -- R=2000'-Southold community Elev. - 16' Note: N/A=factor over 100000 L References for EMR recommended ceilings, data and comments to radiation sources, radiation hazards and available reports on studies of household appliances emitting electromagnetic radiation: Summary of International. Federal. State and Consensus Safety Criteria For Exposure to Radio Frequency Energy at Frequencies Used for PCS Communications Organization/Government Agency Exposure Power Population Density (µW/cm sq.) International -World Occupational 4,875 Health Organization-(EHC 137, 1993) Public 975 International -National Radiological Occupational 10,000 Protection Board (NRPB, 1993) Public 10,000 International -European Prestandard Occupational 4,875 (CENELEC ENV.50166-2, 1995 Public 975 Federal -Federal Communications Occupational 5,000 Commission(follows NCRP-1986) Public 1,000 Consenus Standards American National Standards Institute Occupational 5,000 (ANSI C95.1-1982) Public 5,000 ANSI & Institute of Electrical & Occupational 6,500 Electronic Engineers Public 1,300 (ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992 National Council on Radiation Occupational 5,000 Protection & Measurements Public 1,000 (NCRP Report 86,1986) State Codes New Jersey (NJAC 7:28-42) Public 5,000 Massachusetts Public 1,000 (Dept. of Health, 105 CMR 122) New York State Public 1,000 (Dept. of Health follows NCRP-86) PERSONAL RESUME NAME: Louis G. Cornacchia STATUS: Married, Four Children EDUCATION: Manhattan College, BEE Iona College, Computer Language Courses* Manhattanville college, Business Law Courses PRESENT: SCINETICS Corporation - President Engineering Consultants. After Market Wireless phone Patent Applied for- US Patent Office Charger tech Services, Inc.-President Engineering Services Clearance-Secret OTHER ACTIVITIES: School Board President - New Rochelle, New York. Finance Campaign Manager - Mayoral Campaign, New Rochelle, New York. SDA District Chairman - Boy Scouts of America, New Rochelle, New York. Chairman- Board of Directors Reliance Bank, White Plains , New York Member of Advisory Board of Patriot National Bank Stamford, Connecticut. Licensed Real Estate Broker State of New York Mr. Cornacchia has been employed in the Electronics Industry as Electronic Engineer after receiving his BEE from Manhattan College, School of Engineering. Prior to forming Collins Consultants Int'l in 1969 and subsequently Charger Tech Services Inc. in 1974, Mr. Cornacchia was employed by Hazeltine Electronics Corp. as Engineer, Designing Signal Processor and Radar Display Module for The SAGE System, Primary Early Warning System or DEW LINE, the TPS-1- GROUND BASED SEARCH RADAR SYSTEM and AWACS (A6E) Power Systems. Subsequently, Lou was employed by Loral Systems Design Team developing the AN/ALQ58 Reconnaissance System and developed (two man team) the precursor YIG TUNER - [ALR-20] Crystal Scanner covering the full 200 megahertz - 12 gigahz Frequency Range Surveillance System for interception of Enemy Navigational Fire Control and Homing Devices for purposes of Identification and Signal Jamming. Seven years after receiving his degree Mr. Cornacchia was hired as Chief Engineer by Victory Electronic to Develop the Image Intensifier or Night Vision Scopes (Using Star Light) for the Fort Dix Army Command. At Norden Systems, Mr. Cornacchia developed unique, more aggressive programs incorporating Built-In Test Equipment (BITE) to detect on- coming circuit failures of the F111D-E Avionics to increase reliability and was responsible for Air Force change of Automatic Test Equipment Specifications to accommodate this innovation. In 1969 Collins Consultants Int'l, LTD was formed to continue servicing Norden Systems in developing Automatic Test Programs for AIRBORNE Computers and Navigational Radar Modules. In 1974 Charger Tech Services, a New York Corporation was formed by Cornacchia (President), with Mr. Robert Harris to service additional companies in both the Nuclear and Industrial communities on an Engineering level. In 1987 SCINETICS was formed by Mr. Cornacchia (President), and application for a service mark was filed with the United States Patent Office, and granted. As of July 1990, SCINETICS Corporation assumed responsibilities for Mobile Cellular and PCS FCC EMF Compliance analysis, Intermodulation studies, RF/EMF Site studies and Site propagation analysis. . A partial listing of companies SCINETICS and Charger has been contracted with, employing 30 to 50 state of the art Engineers, Technicians and Programmers, are as follows: Westinghouse Corp. Martin Marietta IBM Allied Signal - Bendix United Technologies Corp. Loral Electronics Systems ITT New York Telephone Co. Fairchild Camera Division Airborne Instruments Labs Grumann Corp. Miles Inc. Perkin Elmer Corporation Shore Media Inc. Syracuse Scientific Corp. Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems Mobile Radio Cellular EMF Studies and PCS FCC EMF Compliance analysis, Intermodulation studies, RF/EMF Site studies and Site propagation analysis. including Expert Testimonies, were provided by SCINETICS for the Following Communities. Case law decisions* favoring Applicant, where SCINETICS Corp. was mentioned as providing critical written technical support data and Expert testimony in applicant's application process. (Partial Listing): Hillsborough, New Jersey Valley Cottage, New York Fair Lawn, New Jersey* New York City, New York Hastings, New York Bedminister, New Jersey Martinsville, New Jersey Little Silver, New Jersey* Hazlet, New Jersey* .Readington, New Jersey* Garwood, New Jersey* Huntington, New York Hempstead, New York * Favorable Supreme Court, Superior and Appellate Court Decisions Benefiting Wireless Carriers T OSHA STANDARD - 10,000 microwatts /c- 9, • 000 UpUPTD 0 0/t To qF pit, 07 4/9, c" 7 8,000 7II/ Pt 0oo0�co`-'437- lf s �n• vi crow qeq �) 7 q s/cnNCF,q CO? 7 000 ois7rC Uqe a Op To so 1/c, •6,000 /cro 411/6. �a77s/ QA, co), @ s co) 4,000 ANSI I New Jersey / Conn. Standard 3,000 2,600 microwatts / cm2 7 Mass Indefinite Code of Exposure 2,000 500 microwatts / cm2 1,000 MOe�4-F/tigc�OSF� 3o�/croiy cogO(F -Or) OttSs /Cop AN).6)1/4<ex, O 100 q 0 — - ---- -- co.? � NF 1.0 microwatts /cm2 POWER (EMR)SOURCES SCIN ® I ONE CORPORARAMATEADPLAZA P 702 CORPORATION NEW ROCHELLE,NY 10801 1 _J 1 __I __J I _J _J J J ___J .J J J ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM Non-Ionizing Radiation Ionizing Radiation 'Howe,(: s�..c, s. r,r �`-...� Y.°�Y�.,1zQ_•;ti�%'a:;?;4"vjz��'?.i!•CY'����.ayy�,,��:T• '.�',� ,3�Y, rr:.., :,n,.-45;:,,,9 -.c4•7. .w. r ,� � j;ft5�l , , :p '� .g d.,s .i s,y ._?o. t ' '-�,•sn"TSs,'T'£v; . }1iF 1 "r t rf�r�Ayrr+l t o- 2 45;:,, ::o k Y v a;,r w�!l'.^ ? r p 4, .. r L F-i•. ..:1).,,;.;4.v..•-1.'i•3f c ,�lf.� rel y 'r:• f .7 i ,�yJ / r' 9 lY�� ,,i,,,,,..:,.„,1., r.Y l iri ? x3 :s y3 t!r' a� 1. :?4 k4� 'U'y ` } (¢ 7 yak i ���;}�, +7;+C. .rayrt����,�r.j� i l�; E:irY=l�;ri�s�.�s" .L! .x'�}:i ,§.� �L•y`u.';•1,,:vt� SC) ,'AavJ ) i 1,M t..iii r F:,,,1 ,ii.:,..,- i" •�ci ,47:.;,_x,1 �?r. �T,e, •f Wt'G�L. .Ll-.ia1���.�rr cti� 3 ..(?3!✓f .1•fv'1i.,..-/F�:!i'%�Y+.� i(4.1n;:,,,;:‘,. AM Radio: 535 - 1605 kHz Light CB Radio: 27 MHz Cordless Phones: 49 MHz e , t TV Ch 2-6: 54 - 88 MHzf..; FM Radio: 88 - 108 MHz - r K Marine Radio: 160 MHz 'V, TVCh7-13: 174 - 216 MHz TV UHF Ch 14-69: 470 - 800 MHz Cellular Radio, Specialized Mobile Radio, Paging: 806- 946 MHz Antitheft devices: 10-20 kHz and/or 915 MHz Microwave oven: 915 and 2450 MHz Personal Communication Services: 1800 - 2200 MHz Intrusion alarms / door openers: 10.5 GHz Power Microwave radio: 1 - 40 GHz Frequency Satellite Communications: 100 MHz - 275 GHz I 103—I—F--1 06 109 –1012 1015 1018 60 Hz 1 kHz 1 MHz 1 GHz Frequency (Hz) eswillo. SPRINT PCS PROPOSED MATTITUCK SITE _rat FAILVSA , et- VW;Al lit to r - .- 1 i - trillirilil • .• 11, r Ilv T • Pecon� - �l aNIF s N*kiliii\44 ♦ � t, '� • 4 , ' , 71 , ., , �� " i�irte` \ii.i '0;1'6 -4 'IA lip— iiwa:) lc,.6 '. l'Ailatts .,1 A.4,4„.: o OP4 ko.e:(% IIIPs : 1 . *k t '`'j.'` l.t; Mattituck ra1 I. - Thipl „Iv ia • d Ili' Jamesport 4.; :7ive-. ` �k ..... #„;_ A ;,, Neighboring �coverage4)4: IpArr , \o g Proposed site coverage.........._ _...,... iiihk, . ,i SPRINT PCS PROPOSED MATTITUCK SITE IT:: �� e. 0 t i%lidalli Peeon • OW ' , 4. i aR9 - /. 'V., sa 4*, .1.4.,'1/47 , ii ill, s ; ► ' -- ' l, ,,,,,,11!).„.:** N 4,-0' ....;,,,,,,;A:K...„‘... b • 1, $,-.A it t, `i� . -7 ,,,,*9 J_al � �0 �,� tie ��' • , i 'AMP. 31 AM. Mattituck I� � J•mgespo Ad :::::W".4141:0":1191 •iil Z'Jul �� .i`ci.... .\ . -_• , .. A ^��o Neighboring E coverage ,,� Proposed site coverage on'' SPRINT PCS PROPOSED MATTITUCK SITE O�I r �'„% , et P .n • TI t! & eco �� �! ir ' - I�• XX _d liy114111 II ., a9 ri as � - '411 ,Fff40 „ yys / rR 'j4.0r`1•4e1,\".i"gtit "t li'4i0At,.%' 111111111 �/�� �� 6 .' �.rrte�: MS _.... 4,11-c-ti::)1Spi '`1'x'1 �'"i�� Mattituck 1 *41 tem- 41* ,tv ‘iii'. oei•Vll,\ J•mesport itil I I‘ I \N, Neighboring EffiD coverage ��� 44 P. 1 o Proposed site covera e tiil 0�1 —amu J SPRINT PCS PROPOSED MATTITUCK SITE I 0 or I I I lia.Peo.0. 1 . '1 t "111...111111014 drill 1 ‘M‘raMillir..1 --.. et 1 FillW'al 4. I py AO 4, 4 Pei! ik.1... , wji, ..10,.. , , • .e.- 7 ... . demifrocl •$ -N% A. et •.-.-- fi vlik,,14• 41, , ,(4\cos) A -.'. ,.. "*. - _ 1 s` ..ie., • _ , _..., ,., , , .. , \ .._. ...„. „......,• if ... itt\ a Iwpmepo Arrt * r an2 :,1".. •-'0, * A p - 0 Neighboring EtIn coverage A•rat _valley, we.74 Proposed site coverage ligr"" ' OF fA, LieveIBINNINNWAWFM.A` _ .i.... 11MIINI i 1.• —......._ SPRINT PCS PROPOSED MATTITUCK SITE kvllilisfogi rlVisfog 0 Q - v. -: .,:econ_it i • as v li .1, id ' 1Pik as •7ti thlt alag -.I til IF, ill,a, . * "" -‘4,14ifir . lar" 441/, '..‘ t ft\;4114* • '(:, `' _„,'"* .At- 1- `11-. .1;1 qi(7- - -aiili IVI ,-- . r <, • kii .► • ,=`All"fir-� �, r 1Jamesport � 1 . �,.� Neighboring coverage ,1�l��� latili‘ �c /174 Proposed site coverage �i SPRINT PCS PROPOSED MATTITUCK SITE iii&ii .1 .., - ifra:hia i et & IW 4 j • I aim '•- C 4.1..t r= `� �l A :. Pee-oonto ` �� t as ;." (P OP 1• . .ti *IVr i . : b ikatio, , 1, - ft It — _ K4I' D c7g, .4*i_ . ' Ellilirr /;“V A*` ,,,‘ 1 ' .. l'.-'1 / iiiii 014111 al ' \I,\ J-mesport � ' � '� " : 4 itti#7---f7e- Ct • 1, Ilk A ��� Neighbor g OM ov-r.ge ,Al 741 41 rOr Proposed site coverage �,� SPRINT PCS PROPOSED MATTITUCK SITE . pirlAreviofied Virrii 4 glib to. ir ..;.- 41'N 1- s, .',. 1= PeeonBd ‘ #11111L. lb - V..1) .1,1 ) .. =t \ ,04114) 101 \11)1 ' fi,* *e..A,,, .ft r 44 110 Ilk- ..,_ _o, ,44;., • 1,\ a 4 i• : , J-:mesport "al). • �, e I n A L. 1 7Neighboring El cover.ge � ,� Proposed site coverage �"' SPRINT PCS PROPOSED MATTITUCK SITE . •P" wrarpe4ei _.....- rarigitip, .., i i • 1 . I,.141#1. -, 0 t AirzWilli , , 't,!-. I .• " I IF ft, VI .4fk ..A. * S. % . i 41. ' it 4Ob , 111 1 xcily4`'''' r 1 1 _4 i 7,p•' 161 167 tit rr St;tf.-- -- !,4,41 laikaND211 Ai , 4.-':( --*... ot aao •,,. ..- • , .c 0 ... • Nrajm * li. Ai , Jamesport iv itt 9 y - , . \ 1 I t Neighboring E{133 coverage 4 Itt 44 Proposed site coverage lifi LIILIIIIIIMMIILIIM mi _ dimia, SPRINT PCS PROPOSED MATTITUCK SITE w. 4,... , ....._. t • apn rit;:c...j t... sr „. .. „.. ,,:„ 1._44.: INF 0 t i Ilf 1IN f= Pecon : W - /t 44, • tiv4,:, ... MG .(1,1 , aimisl, L, . . f' . „4".... 1 'N .t. . . i .,.„41t k . � -rir . .„,..._, _\_ -,.., \ ...,..., \1.4;-4N- \1010- 4,* - :., #4-. , v I _cor- )'' I , ' ...Akl • - . r--,...-,, , , I, r � . \ J•mesport �,, .... 4 i', ;,,,,, 114111N al 10, s 11111 (1 ityrar ��,, Neighboring ip coverage j4 rit Proposed site coverage SPRINT PCS PROPOSED MATTITUCK SITE 47 NEW7ifolii .1 .-- _ 4, 1"11ftel e(011 I Itilli 1. . C.1 I *Thy- immil . • v Peconh t*k _, it aiire1/4 ' ,d ' • '46-.:. , Eaig ttai , it ii; 1/ `'0:.ekie."0! •,, . ''.::' V, .t. sii,licilt$ t 'Cr d PP lb --,-- -- --:' \i'& 11 1 AP" fr' 1 1 A ,I. ' ( , feilsv S4 ''- V e7 A.10% # - NEMEIDS III -oot4e \ • '4 ,)fi Aft---- 114 4 )c \ ,tirs, )1i • A - (/ - .11111. J-Illmesport . • . 0;4, „' 9 / !V It A i I Neighboring din coverage ..jfa •.-,, e 1 4 1• 11=11 FAILTy Illik MirAtierit ITAITei Proposed site coverage EF rx, limmalkytwatt...A\ Ailk--- 1.11 -,Aillaillil.... SPRINT PCS PROPOSED MATTITUCK SITE 4r IMIKweW -- 4ielieV14-1,11 i I aim . V.... 1- v-:. • t if ill* u . tlie., 110!). .14.:. tillki'': .i Peconh ri ‘ • ..., le iv ` f/--, .,...1. ., , 2,,, „-. .'r . ` 1 "C 8 •k7C: III w 4 ;:1414' \10 . -i- iit - I' e7 A 14A iiipr- ,,, . 4 ,.. ,:$,,, 4101 '' ."*4 r 4 let le, Af LEIIMDA1 44 i-.,_ . ... . , .• . -‘. Mca , ..- • ,A....,_-. ,.,,,_ 41:111141 • ik,_, 11: 1 lit ..%° %I- esport b' 1111 "ffill1"34 1, gia9 411It /4- A . 3 ."..- , \ ., 9 lir' ' fir sit, %,„ I I ilk Neighboring alb •over- !e141 .4 .4•41 A wow Imre. , d L IP P.i Proposed site coverage ‘10" ' lir all _-24.A Minh, SPRINT PCS PROPOSED MATTITUCK SITE IMM ,,eiyi _ - , et WV 4 liti to w ,... • it - ilTild • ,,a1„._ Peconth i'A. fillrff, giv 4. Ng b A, •:' 441kk s** A, 4 4410 41 \ ALI% . N-4 444:4 . •,ir 1;\441:1`f44 ill . * • . / • * + a , •47V , 40 ;144.c* 11111 1,\ J•me 6(14119. , t, u1010 Mattituck sport . -ALA (Site --,4#4,01400j% 1,c-tk d Lis Li I h i •..4- flitN,1 ,.. Iv • \43.f• 111114k ,ii Neighbori g aft)cover-ge Wara Di gart 1) 11. ' VW IILLIMMINIMINILA lik\A,.• Proposed site coverage _ i 1 SPRINT PCS PROPOSED MATTITUCK SITE mimPlifoMNV, 7 gi • ' 'kfa.r , et WA)* I t,f,. , jr Peeon ri . . 7ixPM1s aliW104‘s *44iitk; 1•• 4,414t t \ii;;;Ii ,', ** X4_ �rR i`%*NVer44,. 7111 le< 117 t 4.40SV A viii* sf.- .. ... / $ ...6 , 1.13411t1 -•P .-Z 0411k w sos46 Ili 1, .9). 77 l '� I% 61 Aattituck t � W j c • . . ,4 it S ' Jamesport (4, 9 �! • \,:. li• 1 Pii„ `,,�}� Neighbori� g overage �441 ili‘ reirg4•� Proposed site coverageAnoil udionowdk TJ SPRINT PCS PROPOSED MATTITUCK SITE ...-- AM*. t. opir 7 a . ,1 I fit I r,p. Dr e. • ?LAO, <4? 1 Iii -,44.t Peconh v d `0 �'lll t9 ri a Iv as 4..Ak"1" A *** ;40‘ A . ,141 TV , il `441 •MA114t$ 3y $ Mattituck Ai -4IA atvk ts iite !fisraip-T.,_47.0 ,Oits d "1•11100') I !esPo rt.re-Aqiiiik 04 k c •.0 YSV Ilk ili `�� Neighbori g ffincoverage eft hiLtill° IPPPIWPwfir, 1 mill Proposed site coverage it*I� air* _n .. J� SPRINT PCS PROPOSED MATTITUCK SITE , 47- WV*/ t• , • c IVO Pecon86 t`� • �1 Ma ri 'Itvi.....-4 as 401.: 4 1. 4 '•* tt; -' 4 4fr* .4 . ... 44 ,Lirtot •.. ..,_,* 4.21,44, JP ft 2(1‘" '4"'7*,,,raWAI, __ ffr s - '47 .0o , tie , • a 13 -',,;, ,1114>.AL is g 14 A 4 1,1 ,rl•�`'� e��$ Mattituckvii Ai �� °VII _ ,.../Alts0:f.10:41. --i'm 144#1 Fp irw ... J-mesport . .1( ''\ I'4.. Av Ilk I ..,,, Neighboring alb coverage i t ki hitiplarAIMP;114 Wog Proposed site coverage ‘011 SPRINT PCS PROPOSED MATTITUCK SITE _i , /�iii ��r��` ..... , <it W.71 hi #14 I t.• w 11111 • I . -11.Ilet - /Pecon \ • � • aag ri .. 4. . `�� cp % . Al s7\ a 441:4111, it 4,46 drkiiikii:**14 ..:0;404,1i, iLA•044 417.4„.44, 0 0.. .mow ., : 1...7 ,yirfell: ii .4 ..:4/ A 1 I S% 'tie ,� , 0 ot 'c�4# $ Mattituck IU 5:::::0":"it , ,,,... 1, \.6641V1‘ Allw J•mesport il �: it1/4,d • 1- 4 .i` ..... ..,4 A ,,,, Neighboring coverage ��41 kilihith‘ilfair - ` 'tet Proposed site coverage 1............,,„,,,... p �'+. 1,,/d yrt.,4, 4 L) Z VISUAL IMPACT, PLANNING AND ZONING ANALYSIS PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. 415 ELIJAH'S LANE CD HAMLET OF MATTITUCK 124 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD C SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK Z ZPrepared for: 0 L) Sprint Spectrum L.P. N Crossroads Corporate Center H 1 International Boulevard- Suite 800 Mahwah, New Jersey 07495 Attention: Mr.Jeffrey Kitt W t1 417 t-1 Prepared by: Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group,Inc. 1 368 Veterans Memorial Highway Z Commack,New York 11725 (631) 499-2222 November 2000 Table of Contents Page Introduction 1 Existing Visual Resources 2 Land Use, Zoning and Environmental Analysis 10 Visual Impact Analysis 13 Findings and Conclusions 22 Figure 1 - Site Location Map 5 Figure 2 - Site Plan 6 Figure 3 - Compound Plan, Elevations and Detail 7 Figure 4 - Sprint Search Area 8 Figure 5 - Photograph Location Map 16 Appendix A - Photographs of Site and Surrounding Area Appendix B - Creative Visuals, Inc. Letter Report, View Point Photographs and Photographic Simulations Appendix C - Curriculum Vitae of Theresa Elkowitz, Principal of Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc. INTRODUCTION A visual impact, planning and zoning analysis was performed for the proposed public utility communications facility of Sprint Spectrum,L.P. The subject site is a commercial property located at 415 Elijah's Lane,Mattituck,Town of Southold,Suffolk County.The applicant,Sprint Spectrum, L.P.,is proposing to replace an existing 100±foot high monopole with a 110±foot high monopole, place its antennas at 110± feet, and to install equipment on concrete piers. The existing 100+ foot monopole currently accommodates the communications antennas of three carriers. In addition to Sprint, and although not part of this application, Verizon Wireless is proposing to co-locate its antennas on the 110±foot replacement monopole at a height of 80± feet and to locate its equipment in a proposed expanded lease area.Overall,five communications carriers would ultimately co-locate on the replacement monopole and have their associated equipment in the expanded communications compound. A site and area inspection as well as a review of aerial photography were undertaken to examine land use on the site and in the surrounding community. In addition,Town of Southold zoning maps were consulted to determine the zoning of the site and surrounding area. In order to conduct the visual analysis, the following methodology was employed: • Visual inspection of the proposed public utility communications facility location and evaluation of physical characteristics of the existing and proposed facilities; • Visual inspection of proximate areas to determine existing characteristics of and obstructions in the horizon; and • Photographic simulation analysis of the proposed public utility communications facility from several identified vantage points, conducted by Creative Visuals, Inc. Specific methodology used in the preparation of visual simulations performed by Creative Visuals, Inc. is included in Appendix B. 1 EXISTING VISUAL RESOURCES Proposed Public Utility Communications Facility The project site is situated at 415 Elijah's Lane, Town of Southold, Suffolk County(see Figure 1 - Site Location Map). The property is designated on the Suffolk County Tax Map as District 1000 - Section 108 - Block 4 - Lot 11.3. The subject property currently contains a public utility communications facility on the premises of a warehouse occupied by North Fork Galleries,Ltd. The overall property,including the warehouse facility, the communications compound and a dirt driveway/parking area, is approximately 1.8± acres in size. The existing communications compound area is situated on the western portion of the property to the rear of a warehouse facility and contains rock/gravel, weedy vegetation and asphalt as well as the existing monopole and associated equipment (see Figure 2 - Site Plan). The existing communications compound contains equipment of Nextel Communications, Inc., AT&T Wireless and Omnipoint Communications, Inc. The communications antennas associated with the three existing carriers are proposed to be relocated onto the proposed 110± foot high replacement monopole. 2 The existing communications compound is proposed to be expanded to approximately 5,700±square feet in size to accommodate the two proposed additional carriers (i.e., Sprint Spectrum, L.P. and Verizon Wireless).The replacement monopole will be approximately 10 feet higher than that which currently exists and will be constructed to the northwest of the existing pole. Upon construction of the new monopole, the existing pole will be dismantled and removed from the site. The proposed expansion of the equipment area will take place along the northernmost portion of the existing compound. The existing seven foot high chain-link fencing along the northern perimeter will be removed and new matching fencing will be placed around the expanded compound. The proposed Sprint antennas will be located at a height of 110± feet above grade level(agl) at the top of the replacement pole.The Sprint equipment cabinets will be placed on concrete piers adjacent to the northernmost portion of the existing compound within the proposed expanded lease area. Verizon Wireless is proposing to locate the top of its antennas at a height of 80± feet agl. The Verizon equipment shelter will be approximately 12 feet by 30 feet in size and will also be situated adjacent to the northernmost portion of the existing compound in the proposed expanded lease area (see Figure 3 - Compound Plan, Elevation and Details). As previously stated,the three existing communications carriers will relocate their antennas onto the proposed 110± foot high replacement monopole. AT&T Wireless is proposing to relocate its triangular array of antennas at a height of 100±feet agl.Nextel Communications,Inc. will relocate its triangular array at a height of 90± feet agl. Omnipoint Communications, Inc. is proposing to relocate its antennas at a height of 65± feet agl. The equipment associated with the three existing carriers will remain in their current locations. 3 The proposed public utility communications facility site is located within an area in which Sprint Spectrum L.P. is experiencing a service deficiency gap (see Figure 4 - Sprint Search Area). The search area is that area in which the communications facility must be located to address the service deficiency. As indicated in Figure 4, State Route(S.R.)25 traverses the search area in an east-west direction.The northern boundary of the search area extends approximately one-half mile to the north of S.R.25.The southernmost search area boundary extends generally from New Suffolk Road along the westernmost perimeter and continues in a northeasterly direction. The easternmost search area boundary begins near Moores Lane/Linden Avenue (on the south) and continues in a northerly direction across S.R. 25 (to the east of Alvahs Lane).The westernmost search area boundary begins at a point to the west of Meadow Lane and continues in a northerly direction over S.R. 25 and continues northwesterly along Farmer Road. The search area contains commercial properties and farmland (along S.R. 25), with residential properties to the north and south. 4 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP MATTITUCK AND MATTITUCK HILLS QUADRANGLES •t() \ \ ,:•*,•.t., -,.._ „r , >.:4, , t t, \' • -'' � y ya- ` 1111 2 �r : t .. ..,, ( S y \.. \\ ,i , 1 (--`-\.',-c\-4'w(*)- . d; •/�` .i ..,,� II �t' ; ,\-. , C ' \ �, t� \ rr ' .• - \4.0 .• ,_ N� ' ice• L� u , , ,c , < r'4 ''t�_ • •tet , -', '� ‘•„,......--.. Jf3` ' - ', c, •-- ', • ,'fr' , • -----;), '- -•,1. , I ‘„ \,..). .. ..._,.. • .s, / ,,,—' 1 • • f - v�Q ' •' > 1 ff \ / \ .c'e ''', *•,,,, 4,•*,...iNtl,. al\ t. , . 2,.._ . ,„., , , ,, , . , 7.,.. i\i,,,,,i,. ..,.., c----r. '''-'-1-„ ....- ---1, ' ',,v } ,---...-:-...,•• 1 --) , ):„4:,,,, , 1 \‘" / - ''"'-------- \ XC,>' -''\,,,,,, 'Y' ‘..,, • 4 ‘<-:------- 7 '', \ ) i ' \. .':,''''4,Y.. - i... ....,. /. ci ,,, , • \-"‘•** * • ***•Z•ki. * • •,''''• ..\ / '.*•'`'' : '-*\ .‘ ./ 2ag ..." *1 . \ '71:\NH'17"•„.-r„„&.--. . t �/` \.�` �' t\ ,,M' " ,\ .31\ e ^r� $q�.. ill,?r--___•-___7:\: .,` at ,...-. a. i • /r.^-� •r) 't It \ `'� �-- , '' -1 ,; ,13:~\ ` ` +„-1 '' '•1' • j, \ •ir` r C ''y J , �, qui ,' —.. ,,,,' L.-\'•s 1.1.1' ''',. .-::=4* ,,, ‘f.T\,,`,'N.. --,, a \ 0.- ,.'..41444 t J.'', 1., **** *Ili �i • 1� ` SITE \ Li ' .w ^y I l ��r •�. \� , \ ' tom- . • • •�' "'-✓ ,••�,",,-�- s. vs. ....., i. . i .,4 0 s 2 s.. . l'i3t ,....., , o'ss 4 , triallailla:vt: *.ij ) 't **,/, ‘ VS • l�` it. •; X41 1' \) Ott : it' '. ft itl • ..- if-LI-4' � �1 b.-A' •o t j• ,fit1 ri,s‘,liz ti,„„,-1 •.; _ ; "P'.:;:: , _ •1) % --M pp:fizi-,,,, .9-1.11--:-. • ,........, .. N ' —,10 s'• '11"7,4 2.4 . t. .tji&rn`•,i''-;4 C "-,::---;. tr.--- s-illi.. .'''r- ,,...; . S11 ;,...,..,i :4-,J 4 .;4;..,r.;•.„.„,„,,,,,,, , rit,,,..,,,,..1.- "'"'''''A 4,„,•-''''l . 7)1 ,v,....." /.1? \---''. '(V*1,C' ..;.;;''Iii":417:1•4i:: ''. =,...•, ,,,.f• i•-; I''':':' 1, '-,..,) ' _.-----------/--7 -----\ 74 1123 t•�� X y 0 : 11 tt it `! .5 .t 5 ,.'41 ,,..'''4* ( �{ lti • s ;rE y'Y. ..; ire • �, , I/ 6 ♦ r i. ti '',\ •t,', ,',....4-'-'44 ,,, i/ . +I y, M ,Z.V...::.•,;. .,0,,...... 5 5 •5 5.. ..:. • • ,• 1 t v, , ,_.,.,,,:...0... ••••7._,• ,.zt. • *...,..... •. !.....** ,* . .,";;:r*?*,,,,,*%.•**•4*.t.f*S,d0Vf."..•'''2**:41 3-1 opo�uads opyright V 1999 DeLorme armouth, 104096 ource Data: S .111.1.1500 Scale:1:12,800 Detai:14-0 Datum:WGS84 Site Location Map 5 FIGURE 1 a Etlslwc ulWry GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES .'t \\ (DP I I Mpv®IIa1R6w+.m AO 1610 r.GO PC 6a•raw ot•fl nMa a*6 M10I NM 1 MIL316 GA M Mon SOU J I ` � 96661 r Q aaWeR MR Iw1MND.r son w[6 06411,06 • ANTENNA CARRIERS) ( rJJ/ \ J / \ 2 MSR/LI6�NR•Y1Oa O x61=16Y90SI 65611 r�/ /` _ I \ OM PE I4.M 06 Y IIPOI V W 6 Mr OR I MO f / \J• J �` dU/R YalO6 X11 Q!11i�60064.U aVIaQ MOUS ORMTEU 418114445 EONNELLT&VISION rJ,/ i \yip. / \ �v .111 Q/.116,606 R�raM 611011/1646 DARER WEAN f1D0E1 MO=US- FJEYA REFERDa SEL PER � COME= 25 Eltwl5 ME C.' / / \`b2. / yy. 1 1R Eno MIN=9A 11111111 a OM 1.W•WM MRD SEM 0®8B✓9017EY(PRONGED) 117(SOPS) 3 3 314 I lq 130 GPS 1187 R 117 INDOUG( WY 11957 / / 9660516 MO 4 P(CO,r w.- .lar 6 961 U. Mr Pt1.1 '\ / s TOMO E to TY 1L .4=SI .MID W+M U.Ifs A71T I11R11EST$fiACES RP 110I1-N(E]mtI1C) 606•(!7]11114611) 3 4 54 ISq 110 GUMMY TIM MEMO east rJ/'/ \• / \ • .06066 saw..e Q~MD SEDGE.1118 ARE PRopOSED POT gum rJ%' e%,, \ / X9,1, s .0645 RAMO IM a MOOD IEE(m. SW-Co-0601t�0 90' 3 4 31 154170 L96STl1G 111,ON 005160 PEE TO `� J / ( ) (1�) REPUDED ETR OM MAMAS WIN 140E r�i \yam 2S.e, I ,.a*1.I .1.0101113loo-Erzv oarmum MOOD u4.. mum mans AIP9011E(WOE'OSED) 80'(TOPS) 3 / 1�.712 312 �5 4407 Al SEDER IOC ri�/ /� >�• Q ` 'V`\ tow=.4.E Ma me am amen.w et a.at wean tame, Aw�r ENGNEEAwC. Caa7TaleflOM, INC 'law roc IMOD R(1946 Ila 6a r0 45 m M=CT=Cr • MINTED 1Ki7 TO POLE 115010 TRI-406307 /,':/ / ...... Gala Im e.umv �.ru msw 080'11116 EMS w90-5--0060(DETINc) Qs(Tops) 1 3 1 30,Iso.206 AsmsLs w0I -(U:mt a80)H S - _c-/ Woo T.0 X1,1/ ,s- I la mos V ria Ga fA9leY3 PERM �eM.4.0 J/ 141^- , 1 NOR=D E MO NSE 1066,TE WOOD W E•DONNK P 0.'N5 MT 41125 1161664 161D M EN SNLL.1616E 60646E W r// �Ep^ wars Iar.en.6MMOweII MIR 40 0646 or WM=WONT \ J O •\ '5 0101 W M90Ua06 IS raaID a x 060[1°Oa•MS. /y _�% - - E ..aAM51451 10• COMMrini49nE 1616 Maes9e �..Sp L ,� \ M 15 061 IM6M1 Mp a ONM N101 x 6001 absosCPC.SI I • ,-././. / it ' \ .7 DO 000106 6 W MOM MOTS MO IOW.DI WO ROOM/ town.6 maw COS OM M 0ea0Ma SI.W4 POMO ����.. a M oma 941 0)06=1 =MOO 351 E 494611E IC -� O (�f 4106 \ yam/ / C;',0" \ \ IMwrOa WSW 40 W COMM MOORS.OW COCO=II( ( ) /,j g5' \ �, f,> aWOOL SIMONs a E/ OF [Oat III 606 0*MCI=flea W Sprint Spectrum LP. \ 314 / x4 \ ' 7. SIM 10 MOO MUSS ODO.SI ' 1p En,°�D, OCIO 6 MORD 1 r E MUM 0 a 091111 D IID IC i tem(/ona0i 8 Blvd.. Ste 800 / >~ \ , 1OMl Ml MOM 911.0 5Oe E•a 606146 ROEN x COMO Mahwah, New Jersey 07495 / / t 6O =466:CDa46 or Ga MIM.M 01051,6 9.•I E / \ \B�� Osamu Mon10MC6Mi m x 066660645lle 95 066rrco.r.m Phone: (201)2115122-/100 17 ,6-,,,(//, CF's\ \.i„ II Y4....4 IaSaOa 9WM fem.W An au M4n806 w \� / `C �\ 22 \ \ , nhaMM4I�9a4TIMM M DaWIR a•6 n4.Q 611617 60640 a CONED 737 ET._5116_ NO c / / \ 'O� 1.441106 \ /' 12...15.06.I1211=00.„7.1=2=5 01l=0C 9001 CS WWII a1L1Y6LY11�W+6YIW j sTo a 461161°16 1611 1461116_ \ ? IS M OS.a59a 9060 4.!r M(06106106 MMnnIU01 MA 1160107 a INN WM CCM 1!1 '\ HN "/ 006060 IS' *1w1O1•R QDI.ODEMx/O6 Tv( J 55 1ESUN6OMOE GOA // \ R{ +Rcr�,� /OETddi0100 /�/ \E0S EOD.ET 06607-1609 S�OPEj1 1TI1TIF5 / / N wl a 164010 r6In110.115 I61WlD 9W E M Sian•®O.d �,Q /, • ' �, nN W rMIIUw[M6Q®•I6S•MO amMMOS IJn.n511OSOOd ess S�yJ�' �'/ > 1 COMM 1066 ori 50 a 11IMrr MT TRI-Ct renew Woo G. 60 tt€RRICKS ROAD 311 % \ 1.i` // / •�/ \ M R1.6YI.eE r(114656 6 x 06!06.BLOOM 95566 9wt E MINEDLA NY 1 7501 milia .61610 w.6»11066 Mw W IrMl z 5.041 r4.5756.rEascmS 3 / MT y e /'/ / .../ COST.EPA M 406 uwr 061106E 3+EarAmz (516) 294-1090 / �?py /'/ /%,,W/y��/' IS W sr 9061 E POONA=W TOM MOM=5 0 OE SME AN pno 107 / fib. O �� >1 >~ /./ 1.p, SR1II 905 Sr[ir RIIYOOIS • % S /'/ ,y` RW OM I0 OENM=Nu E MEOD WO AMOCO PM 10 % /+ /\S /,/ > i// COMM;s 906 TIM I jacr1239 227 .•./ I Ji Q� ' • /^S\ \ %• gC/ .' Ir.6s M Ga Or x MN M MVO.0•001.I6 6MOM bn,EwN or JJJ // 'try / ..../.....--- --• ..,.• y 4 6 =NM MPR MATO MO COM MI COMM N COM me 1�f%ZON DRIEMATION •/ ,t' `�'` \e' \ > ,• .{ - i, / � :..•b COMM I®�ia¢=MOO 9161 96061.,0 /" s •%/ s >ti /`/ .P, �s J.D.P. •/ u . J/� �� S�• 15.5... /-/-7. ./ ,� %/ �' 4?�/ �''e4`aj�J�' S PC Io�M'm a 061.E TIFF ORS NOM= 1a awhile m 11(4 6P E, EY / S /- �� i� /" • l AS e e6 RUE 10 Mao 1160606 MI 0110 MOM 4 x Mn \ /, Si 306111 IMMO.I FOR 61111406 Ol v mg x m 11 61111.9 P.E.P. % .?(� ♦ • , /�/ \\ i• 1 >> 0601 w[MOMS n(0406 DATE /a�, EWE 40100l11Y / I /1.�,� •� \ •t� a ♦ o> /'/ \-/ %, 1 \ R 440 a PINPIO 6 DIODE r4 4410 X6113 rr as 1611D MO IN 0 D7/1]�w AEPNQA 77 GSE AVENUE i ! ♦y • '%> > >ro" /�/ /c % �� 4064.6.1106 rlpu u am wEDw46 SM.E.0 osamr PAfOOGUF,Nr 1117? % \� , �� S\0,, `/ \''.7/ \ m RMIS ME.0660 O 906 Op Mir a!xi raw=SOME MT i �� 434' /' / 4..6 J `l 11 WINO 10 3n JB MOMS a 0611061 301 0664104 9r1 \J / / 06106 .t�;,4 > j`%�/ eM/ % 11514®16 wREMYa • a / 1110 j 42 Q� ry / / ����((�� / \ 7i Mxu6 o M� 5511 r o1 ni1 5Q wade M 06515�v 511*11 .0' /' =POUND� > \ JO ,\�� ;\ ��%• '� /--, tC/' /" • [�WOu11. •W MCOMM=ENO IE 16W11 10 POI% PIM NW/ ti� \\lO \J '‘\\ \. / %' TO-1yF' / Ira MUM o x.aa /• .- sD \\�L,_ 'T"-1- 5.' /i vu /• r Mo......Mo MN I(5 rman x MOO v•c / 31-I� olD / / Mr 0.0.x MOO=460 Ia.Q MEA/MORS.1•1BI CUSS M=MottO TM 101 ° O UM.COPOZ Of ILL DEM MN %, \ 0/ oti / „.„,../......"-c /' 661661.••Mr 066.1 a Ofa 1c mm 5LW 0151515 MOOS=MI n MOM % E^ \ `. / ` 7 /• .,''C/ / / MOO 4 M KO 901 WI 111 EMO M•1 AIIOME 9rM2S • i ono \ ' • / h / % S\�_y 71•x 66!4006 3MLL 06!606!ILL aac Mo r•IMrc M.0640 b Q Q♦ �,y,w /dmlru I STIyh' ,( / MEC Pa=PO x Ysra!•o 6 Mals rars 6 M Ma a % -P' lam/, .Loot 11111004 % \ 195I- as w 9*0 II u cCES1010 09160 OIL E me-yam a 35.6rt El M/S MA LOOM Mo MOND 901 an M MOM mon 6utrmc 10 KLAN j ,a 7 11 M 9NM awl COM M= APPROVALS • / j- •\•`i w/ / / „1.0 9106 ru®111.1 M.a1�i.n1oi rm1 TO 06045? mn 405 %• ro 316!0666 PROJECT MANAGER: DAIS: / / �o / a M Om.=9rl WM..MO IRO Se Id.evc M 114 / / `�dR7MG I 57067 SPRINT REP DATE '�' '• AGGREGATE TLI11COY /f 491 rrrIM COM O6P NO ODOM mei 1N�M91111a MOS 1 / ,° 631.0140 To 7101,.....7 .P 96.44 MOOS 40(60®066.6 101 DaaMYc W m11196 Vc72fZON RFP' DATE N 6 x 1640 0.0(65.40.2,Co45 MONO=MIT a1.4..P / i'. IMO MOCIO5=COM COM.0•176. .} / / / a� Mr�a ro r1Yco wws.0 SIM Ors 10 M ME we / • 21.W WOKS/000449/MOW 6061 IN 06,41 Sita! '.IArn I UCK 6060540 O E MX new CMOS ro•MO 60515A 6111 O , 1714 /'' ti .to a sa4E>xMEW COMMMONoarmCNI m men 911 YAM e`.,,_''O • " 916.560fx Ll�nr.a01Sou995001 3(ClOG NY33XC688/958283 IL 4A(Yaw 6611016.114r5Q 351 PM w 0570 M( `� .s. ,/ / % MA 644 x MITI 6 M M.M=MOO M4=OMR / BULK REQUIREMENTS , </ / .,/" :a ltran OD mg-Pe a DEMON MOO 9 MOMS x EL JAH S LANE & RT 25 mac DISn6GE: -17111110 aatss 115IG ,�MC=MCI MrM.b.006 5o a M SOUTHOLD, NY NM=CMS /\ ` ~ p i'/ i/ ,O``t1 LW 101 BLOC 4.587.EOE�.1® m 11119114( Rrm04D �� f A O.91 0 MIS awl Q!uQ r e 016RIXTE.Mea IM mu iT. .L?�' ti 61910 4S 301 5 Se 6044 Ela •\ , /% ° (�10.1 400110 7 6+406 -� n u Q<951 cam MM.a 405 Ga mew x®11.14,cOEM%14 2001 DITUC.ST 1000, SEC. 108 \ '/ 1t 1OT 0004 c� 175 117.5 No 111406 BLOCK 4, LOT 11.3 \ / /, 1030 EAST R�EYM/AVENUE 7P� / w 1W DEPTH(NEED 220 4742 10 0444a GOON \\ / •/ % cRE1116Ia.CT 06606 $ E Roe 1790(Ett>1 tm 762 1D CFYIICE MP1t R 25 •0091 RO 3,5 RACNEIS 14010 ,\ / 5 FREE W 70103:1.n 11957 •p.,\ 4011 SE WO/111/67010 71/45 4.6/514 10 64111X7. gr(111,(7` - '\ j 00.5044 YARD(111117) 75 231 NO 4161(11 1.6 a SITE PLAN \ •/= E/VR'Ci'E AREA DO 35 >54 -218 _ 69011111E AIME, \ � i/ ® a•4LE rte' tOT COt91GE(1) 20 12.6 +.6 \ / i / /• GRAPHIC SCALE '"`�'G 111°67(m ,m 110 SITE PLAN AND NOTES yir y // // PETER E PAPAY ,"' / LEGS > ..\ S. °� \ / /-y.i (a sly) -to 20 ft. IM ES COME Eia7wG W NDRaNs MEET wff�F 1 - UNAUEHORIZED ALTERATION OR _ ` . %"S� ---)EAT UF5 COME PROPOSED•. .•• . .. Y� P.O..000 2�rDw7,eE2 \ -E-POOR MAC ADOEIION TO 1)65 DOCUMENT IS , NEW SUFFOLK M 11958 --7-WIDE WOO A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 \\ - 11057I1G 01OR PO mums . OF TIE NEW TOW STATE S 1 EDUCATION LAW. --31-DEW CONTOUR - WY.NOEE997ME 000019M.064400 6 ' r b, © Q 34VI (fWfa><) PBC.CONTACT M FDETERMINANT R FM 0 6 ,,,,�(�� GATE JJ �7 WRFu13 AND FNLLNE LIOKTDFNG IEAUIEFENIS L•::�sport OPS NC IRE(TR FDR '10 BE MOO / ' / 'Y• NIFIR FM STROBE NID MIN o 111Y - 4.1111.111.1.1111111111 8:501 `( / ` GARNER LXALTS ��11:'�'�' IMAM OWNEL M tr X SY MERZON // 9'iMB PRO'MINIMA �. EDIFMDR 9CLTEA ©FROME SURFACE TREATMENTMI ONPOID ��lto 110_L �(1YP.FORA 8 910170 , PFE LENT JUMPER IIR 00 .447 AID 1'-0•�1DtD 2JV i1•I4 CABLES W yy� FD BY MICRO ECT M iWID SE(9)AT&T MOWS WW1 1/ �L I N•: 1)NEVI MIDNA PER SECTOR.MORAN RAKERS(TM) rM SID.W.PDE + ,/• 'IIP/ `e' TCOIGi0U81 LIIcRES -.�- _I_i_III__1 �'WOW/SEPARATION 3 1 0.0. NCI 1804181E F TRW PPC cow! AL® /�o. � Y �/./ S\6 ( N bbe( <) 90: �Nexra wNFl Nao+u TRAPEZE•.' =:>n. 10'4'0/c • O.' /, \ �� '(TIP.FOR 12.8 91340) :'>r•s=:1� q p von MCRODECT PIPE PAPAY ENCT/EEE G&CoNsise1CL10N• INC DEE NOTE f1 ht 142 EQiWE!0T / ` , • /' /'r t./Z.6'OLOPli s4.S I 342 i __,-I-._. 3 YERQW PANEL NDBNA CBUM TYPE M 4ANP 8CRADOPFR CT 91DEL 61717 loo Hcut fr•�.NJ 07048 /, �/0 +2 ,‘i �(TYP.FDR 12 8 SIC") 801.TO OAIIIp ,/. 4`/ t y /� EIECTIOC it TE1EPlIOCIE AREA 651 RELOCATED WOW 191E GRADE S\ �/ 107 ! ! AMDNA(EYP FDR 3) \: ���\\\`• .'(') ' ;;:\CCICREEK( ''.< '`\�M `yam.+\ /' « ` I.1-BUR. /1� S YER¢DN(lRl[MATION IIIY REIfIKEI/00 , '(• )227 •. • �AJ Dl 111• �� AS`�O v ` WKNUi \\ _ +Q57 i, SAM EMMEN.4 CN MCKIE `SEELIEF BEYOND(40OUPNENi \ `•; -' j \ . %UNDERGROUNDSprint SpectrumL.P. ,v��t" \ y, 02.`4 / / Ez51n(,Alkl EOLAPUCM / Z j •'• Crossroads Corporate Center EOIAPMEM ON ) . \ co / ✓� SNELIIR(BEYOND) / BRDGE(TIP.) f } t International Blvd. Ste. 800 COIKREIE PAG , . I ® \ /i // / •\' •) Monran. Ner Jersey 07495 \' A. % •, / / //i / EK61NG 1 it X 30'HRQON oI Fhonc: (201) 512-4700 ` \ V + \ / l WAREHO05E MINER!SHELTER / 3 7 47171 fJ037NC1900 FENCE ; ` Fo.. (201) 512-4713 SPfLNT ROPIEST \\` FX61 IRaXP(F.Io \ \\...\ � / ' GPO <> 014 CONCRETE 4 TCABIES IN(%kDU� '',r- ON ' / E%511NG WNIE'Owl . PERS DU NT L•• i" - E PAPE ON CONCRETE 7-0.1881OWN-LNC© • : >.::;: <•:'; Com, .\ 3i3<::..^,.. �: ,:, \ \.. DOSING) (1D LATCH \`•\�` �'� FAA WI POWER FDR \ _ \ '\ - E76ENC ` `� FM WITTING \ ,�`\Hp��,j 4 \\) \\A� ::^r:.:.:>Rl;;•::>.:..�:: "� I-0 A 1�`. �•�� «PSR` \ \��. ou'n«E ELEVATION z CABLE BRIDGE DETAIL 11 �IE'�eSS 4(516) . NY 11501 CELE ER=© 0.•,,,S2- .r.:,4=.6% `6 cA+ \ \ \i \\\\,\ EYEING UNDERGROUND TELCO WILE 1.20' s- y1•,I[�y°(O[ 60 IHERRICNS ROAD (TTP.) +„_ \``\ 0.....s..; y• \\ ,•\ \¢-'\-• ,, y CDNDIAT i0 UTILITY FOIE (516) 294-1090 l'..1-''',,,,,,,\, T - •\ '� /� 9001 !moi --. \ I SEE SEOUE0CE BELOW FOR NBXVP4T(D 500UENC0 OF L.PROL4DE SNAP-IN ADAPTERS AND PIPE LEG / \y/ •\ •\ MONOPOLE REPLACEMENT EVENTS SUPPORT CLAMPS AS REWIRED TO ROUTE PROJECT NIUaYSER 110'RFPUCOLEMJ ------ i / 500 REPtALOUNO ENT LFOPOLE YANUFACTURFR'S DRAWINGS FOR CABLES TO SPRINT ECNIIPMENt IIOHIOPOLE \ . 1239 .---- POLE *P O0w.E LOCATION REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE FOUNDATION 06414NGS AND Di1NLS DRAY/HEY �: 800 ATLANUNDERGROUND rc ICE 0 1 SEMI o 5'o/c • ` \ ' • 2 X 6 PRESSURE TRUED J.D.P. FX6NNG'CO LIOHJV'C)Li (-1,\/. ' OF BER AT FULL FERNETER MO GRADED SURFACE 11.619EM SDW BIASING AGGREGATE NY ID BL RLMOV(D \0 ,4P. P.EP 7 0 _ 1 MONOPOLE REPLACEMENT SEQUENCE OF EVERT'$ I NO DAT[ ISSUE PROVIDE NEW CANE EVERY PORI (--. `� 0(04 0 i. N14M CHAIN LINA iy !/� Art._wr �::1:�iti::Il.'..r.. . ON BOTH SUES CF MNL 49RODECT \ FEN_[w, I Ci BARBED TAPE '�/j i.��y/��/j'�f:+:;�Sw!.i:',.t.:ti•t:l'�:5: 0 07/12/00 APPRMAL UOOEL 81118 ��,'� . , ' c ' 4 • I DEET 81114 EACH CARRIER ON SITE TO DISCUSS CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. A. ..2. �j ��� \ ��AF.a,L,N\yu \ V , _ 2 INSTALL NEW MONOPOLE 11 DAILDN•REPLACES/ENT MONOPOLE.ANEMIA MOUNTS.GROUNDING \ '`� � - \`ExISONG WHRE ACCESSORIES AND FAA LIGHTING Flbl IIfFE1DYEC fILRR FABIBC.HIRNI 500% .\\--'-'\.-'''---.69-- • \, RALE(tti., 3 INSTALL AND GROUND NEW ANTENNAS FOR All CARRIERS ON REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE. StAIRVfDEOR �EQUAL CXISING RID NEW ANTENNAS SHALL BE DERMAL TO THE DUSTING ANTENNAS(EXCEPT M0101) MATCH EXISTING ©SURFACE TREATMENT DETAIL \•sT •- CEDAR MT: AZNIMH5 AND 000141111 Nan KIM ANTENNAS SHALL BE REPLACED AS 5HOWN ON THE DRAWINGS,• �f of \/ / INSTALL NEW NIC(01000E9 CABLE SUPPORT BRIDGES EICE01 5 INSTALL AND CAROLING NEW 14E4E5 FOR AU.CARERS AND ANTENNAS I PROWIE SURIALT TREATMENT WHIN MIK FENCEL' 9 COMPOUND PLAN NEW CABLES SHALL BE OolIICAL TO 114E EYORNG CABLES FOR LEAN[402 51n C01TPOJ*AHD I-Ii BE1C00.Oh ALL 5P„ES SCALE 1. 10' 6 SWEEP 1[51 NEW CABLES 7 COORONATE CABLE CHANGEOVER WITH EACH CARRIER I:AAX OPENINGS ICTE14 8195 GRAPHIC SCALE COSTING cEnw- Al1AEASIC SEAM APPROVALS B DISVANTLE AND REMOVE F15TWG CABLES AVD ANTENNAS FROM EX61NX OLE MONOPl APPLY'MAW 8181 00K/iN0 TAPE .o + r 1601(FETING BEFORE 00VEa1DE PROJECT MANAGER: DATE. 9 UIIA SNTLF AND R090V((FISTING u(mOPC6E [7(180 PORT 1167ALUIION (p nrr) • SPRINT REP: DATE. I 181E 10K --I VERIZON REP: DATE: PFE7AF E MEWL(MOT d �NTOTKNATTON IrtNW ��; =IONS J DTP.) FILTER FARM WWI 50DX PONT OR APPROVED(DAL CAB "'N AT&TT �' PF7:SWC5 019.)PREMIX SEAUNG CAPS AT'NIS sir WA: © MATCH DOSING SURFACE ' 9I8KE /-IRFAl4ENF 60 ODER/PEAS *. IICROFIECT 9AVETa))0 WIRY PORT "E 11 Xfpf PRC ' TING 1101111�1118'(IYP.1°104 5) GTE 8/958283 BEADED 1 S OD.ACCESS I_'-0'6 GAIT TRACER T PROVIDE FRAMED GONG N WALL GAIT Ft •TYP I /Bb•0.602E a CORER POSTS I '" .f1uk1If'•7IC�{S:!1•N I f:•!I*:n ! MING WALL 9TE MESS CENTER DROP ROD a 2 7 :"�L, `�1(__ �. "ENTRY PORT OR CORE-0RIL 1 1 4•.(1 5 O.D.) 11298D0M SCOU NTWEDNIE POSTS 1.0.0..(IIP.) e l'C/ . ' lx'4p''(' .l''17�'11J1'�1. 9ItfACE 7RFA71ENF I r.. I BM.SEE OM E-3 5 4o E `�<.c:,.;_ 4t_� • �;.• �_ �� ELIJAH'S LANE & RT 25 4+E: s�:.�~ _� • SOUTHOLD, NY o�-/ 'YP 8* ��� IO���L ,„ - <;\''s'' I I CI I I I- -1'"\\ > I sun GRMRRAR 3 SERVOS QALY.4 PONT / TOP EDC[BARBED `��= ;� WEND ERE y�•t - y•iW�f r� •r�4,i ��•�• iS�•I•.�. r + �� �II�II I IC�`� I 1%DIXaUDE: f•7: ;••• tl i ..0••. • 40 2 W��[pI1G CABLE I:-_ i` •v•.• .•O 4• oo.•... ..- -• (ttP Ol) •' E.1T 1-111,11-I TOP Lmlz PER MFIt TYP 4 . AM1111..,��; � ... 1111 . . ,3 --� - DIST. 1000, SEC. 108 r„2,1 Fa G, WAN •i I:::*.••,:• *41:''• I i••O ••'•:i ••�' •d,I :;:*0 I I�I I�I I L=1 I ISI I= MN.COVER WYE FABRIC �' tl••�'•••t • :�. • •�' 44•4' BLOCK 4, LOT 11.3 it .•4 '••••. AV*11.Vi 1 ••i • ••4 TENSION BUGS o 14.0/C !/ II - 11 I11 _ �/' 4 �•Wi�•W.W.4.. �i•i. _U::::::$1,:::::::::41.1 • NO 108800 EiYt v \ POSE 0 8'-0•LIQ. �;O -i ♦...♦ ♦♦ ��i'�i IhOO4J 4i4'°i�iy00�•iii • 1:4:i4+.4:0:401 ♦._ I,r.. .•.•. M •:6• •, e i FB 100004 P GROUND %�y••••i i •••4,4 0.••••�i�••••• e•••••!0•••••••:••••4• ,. • !i•,44 Q P Sv J `�5DiECT GRANULAR t�•OpyM( KOOL I•�.•• ❖•O••.•,e•••O•!I I.i�.4• •i•0 Oi�i•`iI •i0�0: ...� .i.m talt,:kt:,,,i:K i •a•R►`•st,i •:.4 ••.e•.� BOTTOM EDGE KNUCKLED ./�/p��j A. .l_ F=9• r SFE 9I6ACE 7RE171EM DETAi .� �.-' - _ _ tit�i 3'P Sl7EDULE 10 PVC ELECIRC / 4•E mew 40 PVC TEIuNow - SERYIf:E W/CABLES SERNCE W/PUL-ROPE AM)WYE BFEET RILE °AT9aeort7°oM�R TORE • SIDE FRONT z WAVEGUIDE ENTRY DETAIL O *X 0_E,' PER 3 DIA 5� 9 UNDERGROUND UTILITY TRENCH DETAIL NEXTEL ANTENNA ELEVATION s- ' '/2• ° COMPOUND PLAN, •-L- CDC TWIG 8'DIAPSI EE&a P�,s - N GATE ONLY SCALE NONE ('2 WOWED) SCALE:1/2%.1.-0. ELEVATION AND DETAILS RIUTACT000R ANDREW CORPLIRAICN PETER E PAPAY M ( 112i 4,FENCE & GATE DETAIL I PR'`NIDO Lie POLIPROPILENE PAIL NOPE FOE ENTIF'E 4 RESTORE ALL SURFACES 10 0R1Q4AL cOND10oN TELEPHONE RUN. SCALE WE FOUL.STA-03-090,1-0D 9G II dBC PANEL 5 CONDUIT SHALL BE SCHEDULE 80,tA•-TOIsTANT SHEET NUYSER COORDINATE null RUN 01104 EX611NG uN°FRGRWNU WHERE EXPOSED 10 AIAOSPHERE LEIGH/.419_' I *01 2 FENCING 8 RELATED ASSEMBLIES UIINURESAVnullD STRUCTURES.UTILIZE AU INOEPCNDEn1 91D1N 105 SHALL BE(ALVANZCD 2wC.FINISH train LOUNNG SERVICE DEMI.50' UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR Nr."---'----L� �_ (BARS MORE-ASIu A121.FABRIC-A51u HOCM:TBD LBS A00710N 10 THIS DOCUMENT IS A392-84.FRAME WOR.-0510(869-8I I REMOVE a HAUL OFF-SITE ALL EXCESS SITE 101 A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 C ADHERING TO TABLE I.1-C.) OF THE NEW YORK STATE J EDUCATION LAW. N.Y.PROFLQIRW.D4CM13 4 W.064890 FIGURE 3 oo Visual Environment of the Site and Surrounding Area A visual inspection of the subject property indicates that the existing lease area that is proposed to be expanded is located adjacent to the western portion (to the rear) of a warehouse facility and contains a monopole,antennas and equipment ofthree public utility communications providers.The overall property contains the warehouse, the communications compound, a dirt driveway/parking area and fencing. The remainder of the property contains trees, lawn and some landscaping. The project site is situated on a commercial property that is accessible from a dirt driveway entrance on the west side of Elijah's Lane. The southernmost portion of Elijah's Lane begins at S.R. 25 and continues in a northwesterly direction to Oregon Road(County Road 84).To the north of the subject site is a small wooded area and residential properties on Elijah's Lane followed by Rachel's Road, which contains a residential subdivision.Immediately to the south of the project site is a commercial facility that contains Lindsay's All Pro Auto Parts,followed by S.R.25 and farmland associated with a winery. The east side of Elijah's Lane contains residential properties followed by a commercial property that contains a Christmas tree farm and a nursery.To the west of the subject site is wooded area followed by residential properties and farmland. The community surrounding the subject property contains commercial and farm uses along S.R.25 with residential uses and farmland located within the interior roadways to the north and south of same. In order to depict the nature of the surrounding community, photographs are included in Appendix A. A detailed description of the land use surrounding the subject site is contained in the section entitled Land Use, Zoning and Environmental Analysis, below. The visual environment in the surrounding community has been impacted. It currently contains overhead utility poles and associated wiring that run along all of the surrounding roadways as well as the existing 100+ foot monopole. The Christmas tree farm located on the east side of Elijah's Lane (to the rear of the residences) also contains a radio antenna tower. 9 LAND USE, ZONING AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Zoning and Land Use of the Site and Surrounding Area According to the Town Southold zoning map (dated November 12, 1996), the subject property is situated within the Limited Business (LB) district. According to the Town of Southold Zoning Ordinance,this district permits one-family detached dwellings,agricultural uses and Town buildings and structures (as defined in Section 100-31A of the Agricultural Conservation District). Also permitted are retail businesses that are complementary to the rural and historic character of the surrounding area. This includes antique shops, art and craft shops, galleries, custom workshops, machine shops, wholesale or retail garden facilities and nurseries, libraries, museums, offices, restaurants, funeral homes, personal service shops, repair shops and wineries. The subject site is developed with a warehouse facility with associated parking areas and an existing public utility communications facility. The land uses in the area appear to conform with the designated zoning districts. The zoning and land uses of the surrounding area are as follows: North: The area located to the north of the subject site is situated within the Residential Low Density AA(R-40) zoning district and contains a residential subdivision (Rachel's Road and Tabor Road) as well as residences that are situated on Elijah's Lane. To the north of the residential subdivision is the Long Island Railroad track. South: To the immediate south of the subject site is a commercial property within the Limited Business(LB)district(as is the subject site).That property is situated at the corner of S.R.25 and Elijah's Lane and is occupied by Lindsay's All Pro Auto Parts. The area to the south of S.R. 25 contains farmland occupied by Osprey Dominion Vineyards (zoned Agricultural-Conservation District - A-C). The area to the southwest of S.R. 25 contains a residential subdivision that is zoned under the Residential Low Density AA(R-40)district. Moving further south,residential uses resume along the south side of New Suffolk Avenue. 10 East: The east side of Elijah's Lane contains residential properties that are zoned Residential Low Density AA (R-40). Beyond the residential properties, land uses consist of a Christmas tree farm and nursery that are situated within the Agricultural Conservation (A-C) zoning district. The properties situated along the north side of S.R. 25 are zoned Residential Low Density A (R-80) district. West: To the west of the subject site is a small portion of the residential subdivision (previously discussed under "north") as well as properties that are situated on the north side of S.R. 25, which are mainly residential in nature. The above residential areas are designated Residential Low Density AA(R-40).Farmland is located to the west of the residential area under the Agricultural Conservation(A-C)zoning district. 11 Environmental Considerations Since the expanded communications facility will remain unmanned, there will be minimal impact on the environmental conditions in the area. The facility will not generate either sewage or solid waste and will not need to be supplied with potable water. The traffic generated by the proposed project is also minimal, consisting of one to two trips per month (per carrier) to monitor the equipment. The equipment installed on the site will use a minimal amount of electricity. There will be no adverse impact on soils or topography, nor will the proposed project affect drainage. Since there will be no sewage generation or water use, there will be no impact to surface water nor to groundwater quantity or quality. As the proposed location of the communications facility is on a developed commercial property and only minimal clearing will be necessary, there will be no significant adverse impact to the ecology of the area. The subject property is not situated within the Central Pine Barrens and is not located within a Special Groundwater Protection Area. 12 VISUAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Photographic Simulation Methodology To determine the visual impact of the proposed 110± foot replacement monopole, installation of Sprint and Verizon antennas and relocation of the antennas of three carriers that currently exist on the 100± foot monopole, Creative Visuals Inc., prepared photorealistic renderings of the proposed public utility communications facility. On November 2, 2000, Creative Visuals, Inc. conducted an on-site visit to obtain familiarity with the site and surrounding area. Thirteen (13) off-site "View Points" proximate to the site were selected for analysis as areas of potential visual impact. Photosimulations were prepared from View Points where the proposed replacement pole would be visible. These photographic simulations were then used to determine visual impact of the proposed replacement monopole. Analog photographs were taken from each of the View Points by Creative Visuals, Inc. on November 2,2000 between 10:20 a.m. and 1:30 p.m. Weather conditions were sunny with variable winds.These photographs presented a reference point for calculation of the proposed 110±foot high replacement monopole via two 18"x 17"red flags attached to a crane,as seen from each View Point (where visible).The existing structure as well as drawings furnished by Sprint Spectrum,L.P.served as a reference point for the placement and simulation of the proposed 110± foot high replacement monopole with antennas. The site and then each View Point were located on a digitized NYSDOT contour map. AutoCAD was used to create a model of the actual proposed sector antenna attachments using dimensions and drawings furnished by Sprint. Other software was then used to photorealistically render the facility as seen from each View Point, maintaining the perspective of the analog photos. The communications facility(antennas and equipment shelter)was imported into the computer with the actual dimensions as a vectorized three-dimensional model. The antennas and equipment shelter were assigned photorealistic materials; photographs of a similar sector antenna attachment and equipment were used to facilitate this process. 13 Finally, the photorealistically rendered antennas and equipment were inserted and merged into the digitized site photographs. The complete methodology for the photographic simulations is included in Appendix B. A Photograph Location Map is included as Figure 5. The following View Points are presented for analysis: Description of View Point Approximate Distance to Project Site View Point 1 - From in front of 260 Elijah's Lane 324 feet (simulation prepared). View Point 2 - From the intersection of S.R. 25 and 420 feet Eastward Court. (Crane and flags not visible, therefore no simulation prepared). View Point 3 - From the end of Eastward Court (cul-de-sac) in 947 feet front of 635 Eastward Court. (Crane and flags barely visible, therefore no simulation prepared). View Point 4 - From the intersection of S.R. 25 and 1,508 feet Cardinal Drive (entrance to Mattituck Estates). (Crane and flags not visible, therefore no simulation prepared). View Point 5 - From the end of Azalea Road(cul-de-sac) in front 1,091 feet of 50 Azalea Road. (Crane and flags not visible, therefore no simulation prepared). View Point 6 - From the intersection of Theresa Drive and 2,333 feet New Suffolk Avenue. (simulation prepared). View Point 7 - From near 6350 New Suffolk Avenue. 2,333 feet (Crane and flags not visible, therefore no simulation prepared). View Point 8 - From near 305 Hall's Creek Drive. 3,429 feet (Crane and flags not visible, therefore no simulation prepared). 14 View Point 9 - From near 2463 Elijah's Lane. (Crane and 2,120 feet flags not visible, therefore no simulation prepared). View Point 10 - From near 1945 Elijah's Lane (simulation prepared). 1,608 feet View Point 11 - From near 1250 Elijah's Lane (simulation prepared). 921 feet View Point 12 - From the intersection of New Suffolk Avenue and 3,324 feet Hall's Creek Drive. (simulation prepared). View Point 13 - From S.R. 25 near Locust Avenue (Evergreen Lane). 1,309 feet (Crane and flags barely visible, therefore no simulation prepared). 15 REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE Elijah's Lane & Route 25 Southold, NY Prepared For: Sprint Spectrum LP . _. //: , : - = , : ,N., \.•,..-.—....‘„,,,,,,./J \ \.42AC)°,: : \.::::i. / \ ‘,',A \< P I I , - _ - k \ \ \ sem. • • O ks 25 0 : !p ` f.0 - \\ • . .• Q - _ .>. \ . a 1 rte. \\ i • ♦ .; 'tib�' "`. r= *w • \• F is p \\ • •' • 1 �-�� ,rid. t ! `I r t t 32 'f ��, t A t `y ....�(] y ;'r.'yr:.^ i '..v 'fti. 1 _ n re; ., I r.. 4 11 �f - , po A , )1, -... , / (1) ',,, , , I iN..) ji �'•�. te4'� ' � ' -" .�' _ 4 . ` t• ( r-,..,rl'r® I,arr, �19s • � f ;. F ., , , � _.w__ _ X \� ,gin: 'f 3 ��' ` , � (I ' f l� -.� „r �V11- .t i /' I. -.�~' -' : ` Tt -. : Oe' x . fit. ry 1 f/ . � � Ldp . i 4 _ , F • -II �'• — �,.,� is NFt a, ?"4. ' \\,...) " 1i (1,----N_____4_• . • SITE ` `-' •'---41 LOCATION imw111.1171 1\::..):r.. • 0 0' 1000' 2000' .... , hi, , 4e .A Iiciill �, „liD„ \....o m r SCALE: 1" = 1000' �1.i�t 6�lei ` l it . w..--,g VIEW POINT s S ':, 13"---0—\ '132 t...1,.•,-7,--', LOCATION I-64-2 Figure 5 16 Visual Impact Analysis The results of the visual simulation analysis are summarized below with simulations included in Appendix B. View Point 1: The existing conditions depicted in View Point 1, taken from in front of 260 Elijah's Lane (324 feet from the project site), show the existing 100±foot monopole with three sets of cellular communications antennas amongst the overhead utility poles and lines that run along Elijah's Lane and the subject property.Trees and the existing warehouse building block the majority of views associated with the equipment on the ground surface. The photographic simulation from View Point 1 shows the proposed 110±foot replacement monopole(including the two additional proposed carriers) amongst the overhead utility lines and trees. Views associated with the higher replacement pole will not be significantly different, although the new antennas will be visible. View Point 2: As seen from View Point 2 (420 feet from the project site), the existing 100± foot monopole and associated equipment are not visible from the intersection of S.R. 25 and Eastward Court. Also, as the crane and flags depicting the 110±foot high monopole were not visible,the replacement monopole would not be visible from this View Point. As such, no photographic simulation was performed. 17 View Point 3: View Point 3 (947 feet from the project site)shows that the existing 100± foot monopole is barely visible among the top of the trees as seen from in front of 635 Eastward Court (at the end of the cul-de-sac). The difference in height from the existing to the replacement monopole is barely perceptible. During the winter months, views of the facility may be slightly more prominent as large deciduous trees are present in the current photograph. Note that overhead utility lines are prominently visible in this area. No photographic simulation was prepared, as the crane with flags was barely visible from this area. However, an arrow indicates the location of the top of the replacement pole. View Point 4: As seen from View Point 4(1,508 feet from the project site) the existing 100± foot monopole is not visible from the intersection of S.R. 25 and Cardinal Drive (at the entrance to Mattituck Estates). Large trees are present in the photograph. Overhead utility lines along the roadways are prominently visible in the horizon from this location.The crane and flags depicting the height of the proposed 110± foot replacement monopole were not visible. Thus,no photographic simulation was performed since the proposed 110±foot replacement monopole would not be visible from this location. View Point 5: As seen from Viewpoint 5 (1,091 feet from the project site), the existing 100±foot monopole is not visible from in front of 50 Azalea Road(at the end of the cul-de-sac). Large trees and overhead utility lines are present in the photograph. No photographic simulation was prepared for View Point 5,since the crane and flags associated with the proposed 110±foot monopole were not visible from this location. 18 View Point 6: View Point 6, taken from the intersection of Theresa Drive and New Suffolk Avenue(2,333 feet from the project site),shows that the existing 100± foot monopole is visible from this location. The simulated view from View Point 6 shows that the proposed 110± foot replacement monopole(including the two additional proposed carriers)would also be visible from this location.However,as indicated by the simulation,views associated with the proposed facility will not be significantly different than those currently associated with the existing facility. View Point 7: View Point 7, taken from near 6350 New Suffolk Avenue (2,333 feet from the project site and slightly west of View Point 6), shows that the existing 100±foot monopole is not visible from this location. Also,the crane and flags depicting the proposed 110±foot replacement monopole were not visible. Therefore, no photographic simulation was prepared. View Point 8: As seen from Viewpoint 8 (3,429 feet from the project site and slightly south of View Point 12) the existing 100± foot monopole is not visible from near 305 Hall's Creek Drive. Deciduous trees are present in the photograph. The crane and flags depicting the proposed 110± foot replacement monopole were not visible. Therefore, no photographic simulation was prepared as the replacement monopole would not be visible from this location. 19 View Point 9: As seen from View Point 9(2,120 feet from the project site) the existing 100± foot monopole is not visible from near 2463 Elijah's Lane. Overhead utility poles are prominently visible along Elijah's Lane in this area.No photographic simulation was prepared since the crane and flags associated with the proposed 110±foot replacement pole were not visible from this location. View Point 10: View Point 10, taken from near 1945 Elijah's Lane (1,608 feet from the project site), shows that the existing 100± foot is visible from this location. Overhead utility poles that run along the east side of Elijah's Lane are also prominent on the horizon from this location.The simulated view from View Point 10 shows that the proposed 110±foot replacement monopole(including the two additional proposed carriers)would also be visible from this location, amongst the overhead utility poles on Elijah's Lane. However, as illustrated in the simulation, the difference in height among the poles is barely imperceptible. View Point 11: View Point 11, taken from near 1250 Elijah's Lane (921 feet from the project site), shows that the upper portion of the existing 100± foot monopole is visible from this location. Overhead utility poles that run along the east side of Elijah's Lane are also prominent on the horizon from this location. The simulated view from View Point 11 shows that the proposed 110±foot replacement monopole would also be visible from this location, amongst the overhead utility poles and wires on Elijah's Lane. 20 View Point 12: View Point 12 (3,324 feet from the project site) shows that the existing 100± foot monopole is barely visible from the intersection of New Suffolk Avenue and Hall's Creek Drive.Note that views of the overhead utility lines situated along the roadways in this area are more prominent on the horizon than views associated with the project site. However, as indicated by the simulation, views associated with the proposed expansion will not be substantially different than those associated with the existing facility. View Point 13: From View Point 13 (1,309 feet from the project site) the existing 100± foot monopole is barely visible among the top of the trees as seen from near the intersection of S.R. 25 and Locust Avenue (Evergreen Lane). During the winter months, views of the facility may be slightly more prominent,as large deciduous trees are present in the current photograph. Note that overhead utility lines are prominently visible on the horizon in this area. No photographic simulation was prepared, as the crane with flags depicting the proposed 110± foot replacement pole was barely visible from this location. However, an arrow indicates the top of the replacement monopole. 21 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Based upon an inspection of the existing communications facility site and surrounding areas, analysis of the surrounding land use, zoning and environmental conditions, evaluation of characteristics of the proposed communications facility and an analysis of the photographic simulations, the following findings can be made: • From a planning perspective, the proposed site is an optimal location for the proposed 110± foot replacement monopole and associated equipment since it is situated within an existing communications compound that currently contains a 100± foot monopole and is located to the rear of a warehouse. • The replacement monopole will be approximately 10 feet higher than the existing monopole.The photographic simulations demonstrate that visibility of the proposed replacement monopole and new antenna arrays would be generally similar to views associated with the existing facility. The proposed equipment would not be visible from most surrounding areas as it will be located to the rear of the warehouse building behind and be obscured from view by the existing equipment. In addition, the existing communications compound is surrounded by vegetation along three sides of the facility. The existing facility is intermittently visible along S.R. 25 (in the vicinity of the subject site) due to presence of vegetation. The residential properties located along Elijah's Lane are intermittently obscured from views of the facility by vegetation as well. While the existing facility is visible from the residential subdivision to the north, the incremental height increase of the replacement pole (which is proposed to be approximately 10 feet taller) would be barely perceptible from the locations discussed above. 22 The existing facility is not visible from the majority of the residential areas located to the southeast and southwest of the project site. This will not change with the 10 foot increase in height associated with the replacement pole. However, specific properties will continue to experience intermittent views of the facility depending upon the exact location and season. • The Telecommunications Act of 1996, the federal law that governs wireless communications facilities, encourages co-location,which is the location of multiple antennas on the same site.Replacing the existing monopole(100±feet)with one just ten feet higher(110± feet) allows co-location among five communications carriers, which helps to minimize the potential for development of different monopoles in the same area and serves to minimize potential cumulative visual impacts. • There will be a minimal impact on the environmental conditions of the site and the surrounding area as the proposed replacement monopole and associated equipment will be situated within an existing communications compound. The facility will remain unmanned and will not generate sanitary sewage or water usage. Given the extent and nature of the service deficiency expenenced by Sprint Spectrum, L.P., this location is optimal from a planning perspective as it is situated within an existing communications compound.The visibility of the expanded communications compound from surrounding areas will be confined to those areas that presently contain views of the existing facility, and the change in height associated with the replacement pole will be barely perceptible, although the additional antennas would be visible from some locations. In conclusion, the proposed project will have minimal visual impacts on the surrounding community. 23 I it APPENDIX A tl FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Proposed Public Utility Communications Facility Elijah's Lane, Mattituck K14 • •P • 701 Photograph No. 1: View of warehouse and existing Public Utility Communications Facility taken from Elijah's Lane facing west. 4. .fit 1114 4 M / 4-- 'ft.4404 e aA I •1R A Photograph No. 2: Closer view of existing communications compound taken from south side of warehouse facing west. FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Proposed Public Utility Communications Facility t Elijah's Lane, Mattituck 1. ti."- �` + !• i •t: • .- cU• w 'a r..4 . f ` ♦ • .ed .. J { ,. �. �, , 4 � .. Tiiya •: c. • •: .+.. ' 4 p .4 .� ' 1'.r ,,. . •y `t Y S y "spa.. •- ige f(-•}•• 14 Photograph No. 3: Northwest view taken inside existing communications compound showing area proposed to be expanded (along fence). • 2i Aft4,4111WW, Photograph No.4:View facing west of Lindsay's All Pro Auto Parts taken from Elijah's Lane. This facility is situated to the south of the subject site. FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Proposed Public Utility Communications Facility Elijah's Lane, Mattituck yti Photograph No.5:View facing southeast on Elijah's Lane taken from roadway in front of subject site (showing intersection of S.R. 25 and Elijah's Lane in background). 1 74t---*:>;..-"iz'f.:1;, ,‘,A II 1., :rte 14-r.. 'k4114101 yam,. > •,, . I rft A tts t t UU Photograph No. 6: View facing east from corner of S.R. 25 and Elijah's Lane showing vineyards along south side of S.R. 25. FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Proposed Public Utility Communications Facility Elijah's Lane, Mattituck Z , _ J— !.0 ' ,r. � i- s fo. � .. e or' . . 1:• . I kk r I{ c I . P. ! ,p. - .... ') ✓tea+..- .: u`..r.: . Photograph No. 7: View toward subject site facing northwest from corner of S.R. 25 and Locust Avenue. „,.....4:.,uiprnll_._ F: , i. .A. T . ..„, , . ,, . , :.:yam ... Photograph No. 8: View facing north from corner of Evergreen Lane and S.R. 25 showing Christmas Tree Farm. FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWPITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Proposed Public Utility Communications Facility Elijah's Lane, Mattituck -... , I IlhqIMIIIIhllPMIIIIIgkt t ,, .,....�. ._ flit Photograph No. 9: View toward subject site facing north taken from corner of New Suffolk Avenue and Donna Drive (showing existing facility). lirmiligi ...._ . . , . ; j ,. .. , ,,..4 . . ... _„, ..,...,. 111_ . . _ .'--_ __,____ . -tom•� .-I - .. *A t t Mtn ttt t I tI tt Photograph No. 10: View toward subject site looking southeast from corner of Tabor Road and Gabriella Court (showing existing facility). FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. APPENDLY B ir FREUDENIIIAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC_ VISUAL ANALYSIS REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE Elijah's Lane & Route 25 Southold, NY Prepared For Sprint Spectrum LP Prepared By Creative Visuals, Inc. & Virtually Real, Inc. November 2000 Creative Visuals, Inc. Cold Brook Road Post Office Box 435 Bearsville,NY 12409 Phone(914)679-9055 Fax(914) 679-1175 November 11, 2000 Mr. Jeff Kitt Sprint Spectrum L.P. One International Boulevard, Suite 800 Mahwah,NJ 07495 RE: Sprint Proposed Public Utility Communications Facility Dear Mr. Kitt: Creative Visuals,Inc.,in conjunction with Virtually Real Inc.,has prepared an accurate visual study containing photo-realistic renderings of the proposed Public Utility Communications Facility("Facility"), consisting of an 110'tall replacement monopole with antennas,proposed by Sprint Spectrum L.P. at Elijah's Lane and Route 25, Southhold,New York. The proposed 110'tall monopole would replace the existing 100'tall monopole that currently has AT&T Wireless panel antennas,Nextel Communications whip antennas, and Omnipoint panel antennas. The replacement monopole would have antennas mounted by five carriers:the aforementioned three carriers on the existing pole in addition to Sprint Spectrum L.P and Verizon Wireless as depicted on the plans prepared by Papay Engineering&Construction Inc.,the applicant's consultants. Creative Visuals,Inc. in conjunction with Virtually Real,Inc.,has prepared an accurate visual impact study of the completed site,utilizing the process described below. A two-man team made an on-site visit to obtain familiarity with the terrain and its surrounding residential neighborhoods. The proposed site is located adjacent to the existing 100' monopole. Thirteen off-site points ("View Points") were selected within close proximity of the site from which five were chosen for photo representation of the completed facility: Description of View Point Approximate Distance to Site View Point 1 —from in front of 260 Elijah's Lane; 324' View Point 2—from the intersection of Route 25 and Eastward Court, 420' crane not visible; View Point 3 —from the end of the Eastward Court cul-de-sac, in front of 947' 635 Eastward Court, red arrow indicates the location of the top of the crane; View Point 4—from the intersection of Route 25 and Cardinal Drive, 1,508' crane not visible; View Point 5—from the Azalea Road cul-de-sac, in front of 50 Azalea Road, 1,091' crane not visible; View Point 6—from the intersection of Theresa Drive and New Suffolk Avenue; 2,333' View Point 7—from near 6350 New Suffolk Avenue,crane not visible; 2333' View Point 8—from near 305 Hall's Creek Drive, crane not visible; 3,429' View Point 9—from near 2463 Elijah's Lane, crane not visible; 2,120' View Point 10—from near 1945 Elijah's Lane; 1,608' View Point 11 —from near 1250 Elijah's Lane; 921' View Point 12—from the intersection of New Suffolk Avenue and Hall's Creek Drive; 3,324' View Point 13 —from Route 25,near Locust Avenue, red arrow indicates the 1,309' location of the top of the crane. Larry Heimel took analog photographs of the site from each of the View Points under study, shooting Kodak Royal Gold 200 ASA print film with a Nikon F-5 and N-70 camera,each with a fixed 50mm lens. Two cameras were used to provide an"insurance"shot. The photos were taken on November 2, 2000 between 10:20 A.M and 1:30 P.M.; conditions were sunny skies with variable winds. These photos presented a reference point for calculation of the structure's placement, via two 18"x17" red flags attached to a crane. The flags were set at 110' AGL(Above Ground Level)above the location of the proposed replacement monopole site. The negatives were scanned at 2700 dpi(dots per inch)and then digitized as 26MB high-resolution files. The site and each View Point were then located on a digitized DOT contour map. AutoCAD was used to create a model of the actual proposed structure. A separate, 3-D software, 3D Studio Max,was then used to photorealistically render the facility as seen from each of the photo simulation View Points,maintaining the perspective of a 50mm lens. This was achieved by exporting the "model"of the monopole(along with the location of the View Points, crane reference points and monopole)into 3D Studio Max from AutoCAD as a DXF file. The 3D software utilized this imported file to reference the facility,two red flags attached to the crane and View Point locations,thus maintaining their relative X,Y and Z distances. The facility was also imported with its actual dimensions as a vectorized 3D model. Each View Point including the site was elevated to its proper AMSL. 3D Studio Max cameras were set at each View Point's X,Y and Z location and photographed the model monopole with a 50mm lens(correlating to our analog 50mm photos). The X,Y and Z coordinates allowed the 3D camera to render the structure to its correct scale, rotation and angle from each View Point. The monopole was assigned"photorealistic"materials in the software's materials editor; a photograph of the existing similar and other facilities were used to facilitate this process. 3-D Max software simulated sunlight on the monopole,taking into account the site latitude,date and time of day of the View Point photographs. Finally,the existing monopole and crane were digitally removed from the photograph and the photorealistically-rendered monopole was inserted and merged with the photograph of the existing monopole into the digitized site photos we had taken and converted from 26MB files into digitized photographs. Conclusion Based upon our over eleven years'experience in visual analysis, as well as analyzing over 200 public utility structure sites throughout the region,we are confident that the enclosed visual study accurately reflects the appearance of the Facility,consisting of a 110'foot tall monopole located at the captioned site. Sincerel , La eimel,President View Point 1 From in front of 260 Elijah's Lane Existing view . - . • • ------ ... ,..--, _ - . . , _ - , , i .... .------ V V , ..: . .....- ___..-• te - -,4 :1-"V.'1'6 . . .. . •. -. . •'. n 10' -P,- ,N, i. ,.,,,• • , - ,t , , i ki- .-•,:-' \ •-• ,. J. • *um ,qt. .k,-.- • ..„ , , it . .-- ,• . • f ,- -' limmitis"11 •, / . . . „ . , -rV V Photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. & Virtually Real, Inc. View Point 1 From in front of 260 Eli'ah's Lane 4-...-...-.. _ ' Computer simulated photo by Creative Visuals, Inc_ & Virtually Real, Inc. 7Fi'3714'0,4'1:A .,.:l',7,,, Pr'' „','.•, ,,r:,.,-..:.-J,_,aLw...ir.lt,,,,,,.,,,I,I,N' •„:,. V-,...•i.7.e.‘,..w.." P :.-.3.-ii,n•.--,-2 From theintersection of a, Pn.d.4.-...-E. a,‘..1.si,.t.7.w.1•••.,,1.•...ta...r •,r.d,,'.Court11"'e:-, Crane not visible ., , - . ...Z. . f - _ -,. . . . t.....a',"„' 1....gr.,. '., ". ..,,.'...4•..','C. ,.,.;, :r:`„ ,'. i- ". . .,., 7 • 1' . . -,• •it. •. .Ati. - ***•••- -" * fl•- ;*114: .4" .1., ; .„.241, -1'1‘447, , '11 t.,, ...i..'*,, :4,41 (.•--i * 44;4,1 t:-**; 4,,, IT ''- kiliet.. ..* , 4.4..). ,'..`,„41:,ico'', , „!4 „.,, . . f... ',„', , ,1, ;IN ..f.4 .., .,t, ,,-, .;„ „..„, i1414 • 4 . -4.41,.%, -.4.'44 ii‘ i„. .4 `a- ' -`• 1.' . ',4k.".. ' . ' - ' r• • ' * '' %.1. tk 44*7., ,: '... .-.,,,,i'il • 4 ,, • -,. ---. ,,„ „. ,,. r4; •,,,t, * .. ..,- ,. - N 4, -4 %. 4v,1)-ier • /.: .,. 4t.„. ,,-, -: 4--$ - '•-- -•• : - -,- -)61,-vi,;,_:6,"4 ",--. - ,411its' -• = - '-?--c'' ',.."'t N*,_ ;011 ' i' " 4.,..` ''' ..."'" , ,' '4,,....•..,4111t.'•:,.. -;., Aviti,••...:..;•4,.. 4,5 , ,, "*••• 1; .. ,, yer 44.1 we „,,,,,,.• „or „, -;*m.,. •„T...., .*„, ,..y.. -• .: '3'.* ,f,-.•.%,,,,. ".„6,,....„•.,,. -...... • .•,,, a . ,.....i..„ - 1. V', 47,,%." *„.' -; '`, dt.',. -;,„ .1 • :...., , k'sr ' s, "T., , . ", . .:, ‘" f :.....*. •• ;#•-..,; Nit***- ' .‘-1.:11' .7.".;- ' • 4-, '''. ''''.": .4' • 1" : ` V-.< ' :as ., - .' , ''''' ''' • '`.* e • ' it, '''''.-- .' , '''''. ' ,. ..: -..• ,.-... b to.- ,..,,IP:'.1 ....t, i4., . . . ..;,''' - s.„-,t, .'..-:` k ;g: 4 1/4 '' ''I- '4 ... '4'.: '''' : .:- 1: :tts- .4:4 • . . '. •IAN* • ' 41. ' • 4- k. f' 1 'v.,-',';' IC „ ', • • 1 •-*•'t-•,* "(44.;,„ V., 444t% 4,411,, .... V4.% . ,, " ,..•',•.‘ ,..' . '+" , : - 4,* .zzlir*' , • -* ,1„,j, N . ,_ 24, . ° ,,,T. '-‘a641fi..11'.-.. :1 ' ;:,:• (‘-*. •:".'1,, sai.' * • e. ...44. t• . . 4 ..b.or '-. -Ito\ - - --- .-A..-"t' *!-:‘ .`:=14 ' N ' r,'7 -;-:-,1,..'4,•,..kop:-•,*-Aigi..• -'' :44*--. - ::•'...s ' •'P'l 1114* '..^.:Z:'*^ I': j ' '- 'Y-\,:'s' Ar_t=i1-•••' ''''y,' ; '`. A .,. .. .:,. . _ :..*: ‘,. 4*," ,.... .4.• ,„ .1 .... ,, ,....p . 04.„... 4-,,, ,, -, - . • ,,, ,..... . ,•7...'-,,f‘.. , .1 41* , , , ' • ,(14.74„t ••,, ,•-,,,t,,,„ • „*. , ,,, ,. . . ..,..- .c,.`„,,f .14, ' ,,,,,."•,_ ..,.., .... ...I' -...i-tie i I sA, -•• .,fft`..N.' .117 ' , .y , 11,...,s.r., . . • - „AG ....*-1 * '•F• * ) ' le,44.4 ,A ,• I .,1* 1 • jA.. ...4$14,e•r*Se•Nrir IN.**•(*„ .z. 7.•••c.. ....4.. •• •‘'.-••• ‘, . -/ _' 1 ...k.7740 , ,• ".: .1".'..""i-, ,t c k ..),., • ••• 4.11., '• I" -4 ••,- -•41t : ,.P...4;- I 4111•!• * *'" •' l• ,„., ,,,..,•*44. •4_1.;...,.; _ , .* 4 . . .....,. , ... .... .,ik qiht. -.ft.i7 444.-0...<1' -..c. • 1,4-v• ,..Q.'. '1/4, . . ,,,., .„,f,+:4 ,. t..:, •s-, 4tink, ." ,„ , t t,:., - • • . .; , . 111;•.' ' ''`ii,,- • ..-' .4,,,,' e*fiti4:` ',n •,15* tikole...1: " ' r1 -,,.. --$**1,1,!.. ' '-'4:,W"r• •• 14; 4*, • ;. ,4, ...s"t, ."... . •Yi•..„•' ,,,4.42- •••:, . -- . 7',a,-•-c -,,,IlY 1'4.4•,,,I, '.....A. 1,,' ' . *, ••..c,i ,, .., 4 Q't -. .1: ' .s --*:" .., , .,-; ,L • *, * ,Ig!froi.., , ..„. , •• '1`-• :,:. ., VC,: • ;\,, _ ,4**„,L -', • ...471„,„. 47.,_,;:-..,i,,-1-. .,-,:-.,,, ..:-... - l• - 4'S N 'P- 1 al. ,,,, ii-;411144*1/4 "''. -Af IN '. " '''' ' * ' ''t, .:77 4, • .... , ,. .40r.. it t .! ' '.,*.4-ZC*-j';,,-. 4, ':** '• • • . • NI., . , • -„,,. -4,,e14.^.., ' --,'„,' - * '-i"..."A s - ,...4., , ,‘.,... . -Ai, .. - .4.e.„ . ..,, . . •..,„ . 14,4," . , ......1. , . -ip. ... 4, ,L. ... ...Iv,- '"*iv .u. . • , . ''''r , .".",,lk .=-•.=.g•'..,,k,l'` ,,irk,' A ,4% ' ' --" - '., • . ' - •- •"' ,....',7's:,,,;,.....,‘, "'",, , .' r- ,i,..- ._,_* .:* .,---:t'..-- -.Q.,..N.-.'.9Vry.,''' Nt. .**.4 .' ( 'II ' 40* 70,, As•••'..,.. t , • 015 ' • 1, tVit- -, AN**, 41,...-;"•• •-• "'..- '..-' 4: ,•4 l• . jt.4", la. `• • .. - 77PW .1/44 V, -' *** •••*'''. 4 •;44* '... -7.r A 0„, i,- " .. • elliV, t' .- 'a •• * •4 - -.. ''•4.1 .. , i.. .•.,.,-; 4 •P,,, ,1„ '.f.-',.r .Y4,1*- i,', 3 •• l' ...i* , 1 • - •• '-=' ' • P:•.04.. 41Ra , . - iV4.11111 1 v '", ,,•f, , 44 • :- i ;41 ,2'-V It -. - ,,,14 .. '!. ". . 41% ' -. ' T i 3 _ •' ''' ".••- I ...• .ro. , ,--- , 1 1 - . - Vgt • -4'ti- 14!". ',..., • :•.. ,...... . . iiilL ...0., ..,,.....,, _ 41" - lit t--...4,-. =,. .1?--..:,.;-:.• , iV. 77,1h_ ".:• : ;'-' .- ,,- - sAif . . , . n.. 4 • 1`.' ` a .• i tilt I ' 1 t .,'Lk• t syl. ,,, , i .,,4, .i.-4.4,,,,,,, , . ,-.. ' a ' , • ' - PA - - ,...i- r .,t , ,,, , . . .. I.,.. .-., . iti .,N4.4t . ....•RE*.• ,""' , . , :•••* A. str*:- L ••* .";:,„, ;,,,.., -- .1 ••••• ,„,* ' _- S' .., ,, ''''''*.j- -'.. - -----_-------------------- - _ - ''' ' .....-- ' ,,• - _ _ -,•••firgiti*-- - - --- --,• -------------------- _- _- -)4101111111111011111 11110 .7. ',-'-••••-•°. '--"''',, - '' '. 4461-61411.11011MEMINSINIOAS, Photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. & Virtually Real, Inc. View Point 3 From the end of the Eastward Court cul-de-sac, in front of 635 Eastward Court Red arrow indicates the location of the top of the crane i f • I V. .tf 4..}-._ 1 t g .r t 4-.FF7 c s. r 0 + yy,am�-' . to ��- - - t � •., moi.. 'aZ fi .� 4.1.%:-$.1.' }R,yg rsFa� 7""� T"xK.. `' - 1 ;'9-�\4' '' i,,. . ::. .>-.�► _ �'r�..si. t rYT 7_ r 1 « i �Q`' > 1"i` ! ,Ja�jy+ s.r w f F� • • �. bt T ! d � + t 1 -4-..:"-....v40-:•. q _ ',..,:t _ %,:r k . a1S' 4in - r s, r .rx �tr �'.. yam' 'J,`V -4.a ,' .�r• •' 'rte' • y'h UMW • 47.. , II.* L. . V'-- to oi I . .......... • .1`-;,c._. - - - , L Photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. & Virtually Real, Inc. View Point 4 From the intersection of Route 25 and Cardinal Drive Crane not visible • ..1 41r4i4),Ii 1 t 'l 1 ,„ 4 ”.4. ,;, : -•v-1;- F r _ -7 / ...4 ..,1 . ... / , ,.. PIL'i ...r k ,t ' , ,... , t " '• - .. • 1 ''' .. itke,ef .. ,.. • , ... ..,,e, ,, ..... ..,, grzi , , .,..: ,'t T •..tt 74 tit- %.4. tf:firty:: ' 4 . ' e'"t .41$1'144'•'t -tt':.-''' et ' t-r-..N.,.,,,- slit . . 4..rit. *--.s.'' ..744,4,4, . .. - .. , 41 .,. .-1- ,... . , '' i r,,, ' -\; :-,' -• , ..... ,,•-- 4 if.iI• .. _ • , . 3 , A , - s.., lf.t , . . 04, • ' J_ '‘ '' " 1 ",1'.' , - '' ' '!".•- ',"' '. :L.' 4 ,,*4-.-* ,,. 'ijO_,- , '- '' : -' . ' .\'' '' A . 'T - ' ' 'wic, i "'• \-',,, , ' i '- 40 c ' ' , ;/ ,,, , . ,- _ 4' i' .. . . , • it ,,, ' . i," f ' ' -t ' •" ' . . •!,' ';t111.„,., '-' -*,.'• ' 't t. , • .,..•- ,•"• -t. • , • ' ., __„. ' e:,-,,-.4. • - . „ , 1 t .....4-. .. 1‘ - jW„ 4- A ' -A*. '' •..' .7.'--'''' 1' -.""4-*".* 4 . 4. ..,.- ""'.1 , -t . - 'l_ •' .... ..7; tI•..1 : .' ;I: ,..;41,6 ,.. ...• * //4 1-.441. ‘i."''.. A -- i d — OW i 1• ,. .0......., .. --.'... --- _ ............:1 .0.-,'''''',.....,. ..,. 7.o... --- .......-. ....., A, .i - .-.•••••... .,41Mslipt6.4........g.f.. _ -- am••• ..r.. R•••- - ....-..* "-"............. - -.A..... I -- -----* , •,.-• ,, ye •.......‘" , ..., ,4r - ' ,xr „Ate -..."--"411111111.11041011' AlA Photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. & Virtually Real, Inc. View Point 5 From the Azalea Road cul-de-sac, in front of 50 Azalea Road ,y{. _ Crane not visible 'Sy y \ 'C\ 1 Y } ,' a`L .�i Y 't`. \.!.01. * { 7., ..4' \ ,4" .. 14- 6 ;i ,i `�s], �„ r,i 1,'�.•`� ! ',,,I. ...1�.}• IA 41,'.a. 'F `ri*" et t\R:� •,4 .--:;A- . - L,1j....+. t� • ?"` • \kl , w, �. 7 , si,CC" A. 1,4 ., A\\,1,1,.:' i • -- t TTT -L Y" ; :7 v t .'`I i1,4,4+ el... •\ Y• 4-.114 ryi,;Q1 _ '►R. ,� 4.11"......-4',. a a Y�T k , \ `, R` • n ,`. "/'� 1 . „1-*„.,~ `�1, }' J/ t�>."T- ,,,,7-.. • `*i. 1111-, = • 1�,�' 'fir ^t` `.• .,, ,... ..,/,,, .I ,... ,1kR `i� \ 1,7 �_ .:, .„ < 1, rrc,'. l'i3' 1 1 ; ,,-s-fry a r -a 1 firt,,; .mak R•�" _ ' . , Q �F•, 1 j';`.;' ? •"' „..`11',1, ...4 ,�.. # L t q * �.-c,, t ^zt'3 • ^ t V 3 • d8> '�h 1111- 4, ♦ ;.. �.0 i t/,'•6 � ;i��1S Y ;, �v 4,10.... ;, •i 5 4 1. ' ~ ,.rA A,;1` .1•'S, ...•..,,,ii.',..ti w'n1P R+� k"`• • ,411:::• :y'; "e? ! rr - '' ••. J? -...,:-.7...741,4-' 1 ,�M;.1 , `` t,f. a , .'.,g-,,...4,4,•t �t' 4 ,j t '-`' '�. ' tt, ,'Y v " 4` .>,�S-t' .. e;; vt .•,1r."*. # i . _ JZ '[45x3 r ` ./ aC•�% , ;.s-? .y,_' a t� �I • '1 �$• 3,kr '^ ny`•»`4 :'T 1-�j 6�4 .IL \ s \ - ••-hill-'..,4.•m•+ r ' [ w -.. i '' Photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. & Virtually Real, Inc. View Point 6 From the intersection of Theresa Drive and New Suffolk Avenue Existin. view • r LL . . , `••, ".S" . '-'010•••••, .+5 �"�+•'�'�`i�r''G"' ,;�. •r' r f - (r � tli7 • t-41090011/01101114r* 4" 111.. . ea, ,sic„•. .\ g n •. "1 ° +f'•r } �-..."+ _ v.. firm a` 'Sk eA'.. � y - ""' Y' .'' _Y '^ k,►y, y;` fir" "r... _± x tw r 6 • • ♦1" . Tom± 4.4 Photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. & Virtually Real, Inc. View Point 6 From the intersection of Theresa Drive and New Suffolk Avenue - . ---. - • ............000.00.0.---- . _ . - - ... ,., ,ost, ..;**"., '' : , ',Iit-1,.;-• , -, 41•• nt• • — •. 'rk • ......' '. .. . , . . ., . iftlikatasillte.. 6 -- i-3-' - — 1.,`/. , , .. _„ .„, .,,,,..,....,.....:- ...-4..p.;:„..,,,,..,.,•--.??.... ;,,-...,,...)--• "."--tif - • * - i)11:t' \ \...'''''''s k'-11-1.... ..- ' ----T. 4/7'11'." ::1-l- ;*:54.1 ' ' . • 1°11116P14111Vailliel .1 ' 11, ,,,. lit ..., .,, ,..,.,..,.......,,,,,:i.4 ......,7.,-;,46:•,:sz...„..,q,,..s.„4„.6,...._, ,4. ::_.........c......s oc.......t.,...je.14 / 1r ;44\t'c..%4 ' N'''''*4 . . :44k.1';‘.`'''' "6.4 •. .: t. N 4/114 . 4lit,,%,,• , t , . ,7 tit t 41, toOg'..4-'" •"" 1: ..;, -"---, ""•:;;;"--.-4-1.- ': 4 ••. 1 . k„ • 44•1. . '` 4 '4_..4 -.. ,„,: ..-..._ .4 4, - • ,'N' . . • ..%Or' . .et,glit -.1...4 *4% lb,.Ili•44 ‘.1a / '.1 .7. Z; ,"4 4.'' ''•.' + - /ii 7 "IL '42‘ r,406. i Y ' 4 -....--1* ' •-- 4"". .... •'.41 • • • .` '', •• . • • • • . ` . , . . . . "..• 4• iir ikh'„,, . . _ - .. . , , • .,„, • - . • ...Q40.... Computer simulated photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. & Virtually Real, Inc. View Point 7 From near 6350 New Suffolk Avenue . I • . - i 1 r _ .ls. ,t . 3 rr '+ l ' 444 ' _ '' yy$� iayrl�re4 * tel, f ,x' r 4./n '••.Y a r 3 :.y .a" a ♦r s`a' •fit i. r W . iii,•�, 1 y ... ' T sr .-� a, .S yr Aa. V,. .ill ' ,r y • .f... . V. !f '�.. .rrl;`; "I , . a- '! ♦ 7' s = :.! f , . 4 ' , - - r '• . , - •t<r:`� 4.1,4:3111-J `1 ix ` . �••� ,!• .~ .,f • '" yce. Photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. & Virtually Real, Inc. View Point 8 From near 305 Hall's Creek Drive Cr. - ot v. •• - _ . .. . • 1 , • . , • , , ,.4-.1-c4,• .., ..•-_,..A...,„_r- .,,;•,....,.-- ..- - -.- -= . • , , 1 --, ,•••,...1 f'1- • -..-.44'.• ..;;- •'.:".-.41-',6, '' i•,•••'1,4•,C', .• *.4'''.-' • '‘'.-T •' ''''' •• ''. • c •,•. - -- . ' '„. ‘•.. - )cV ', ' - . ' ••-r-' -}'•..•'•:••• - -•.• '• . . . ' ' ' f .-' :.,.: 4 fr:::,,?:.-.-.- • -s:-,-..,s s..•s .— - -. . •• . - - 1 ''' - ' • . . , . . ,.. . 1 • ... i . • • . 1 / , . *. • •.,!. . r w.:1 4 • , ,' ,..k. ., ,.:. ,,„ .. ". . 4 , e . . le• Zi( ' Ag ,":" .. ' '1' ..., .., ''i- • a • ..' ' t '.- ' • • . .. 1 . . 1 ik.. .,,,s, .•,V ,...,,,,.... , , • • • S ' ' '. . • V • -------- ,. s. • 11' . ' -- •• •'V - , ' -'11 - N ' ' • •41 , , ,.411.,''. r• .• , .. • -- i 7". .• , . , ...i. . .. ,... •••, \ -. r A r. 1* .. ,- j. ,• ' . , . . ... . . i I. ,,.. / , i , .... ... ,e.-- ,... . 4,, • .. . . - . . . I. • '',1 •;•, ' • ' - . • -.,,,,i• ' . , , •,, t•-. ..:. .;• - I I" • • . • , - - , • .-it/ ii . . .,• . . . • :: . • A .. ,. . ., • • • . „,,, • \.: .'•f, ' i,.-.„,........."---.; — , i It. _, . ,,,- 4.--11--I, . • :. '.' — . • — . '3 •.' ....• ••••1411it'•-•'.; .: • ,,..<..- --..• : ‘• ''''. . ., . - .,, • . • , . .. • I. . ' • . . - •\--«••••,.: ,.t.,-.ex .. ... ,.. ... ,., - -.r • . „ . • , l . . „.,.. ' ' • . . . • . _ , . ,. .. . .,, .... , . . . ..- . , . . . . . . . , . ., .. •„••,' . . . . • , ,- , ,.,, ,v, - ' .. ”•,,---:\' , • - ' 1• ..4 ,s• 4'.134 • . - .,- . A ..." Ob. ' . ' \ t. ' • . . , . . I . .i.S'.4'.' .4•4.--• - , •'‘ • . 4.- ..-• .• - • • . . • .. . •, ,• , , • . ' .4' '‘4,-...„1 4r, - , . ,./.1_ • ' . • ,. • .. 114‘. ' ..s.,..401/#4,- - .••••+• •• .i-••. .0 l',."; '' • _ ,--. int, .4'..t •' ,,,,• , . 4,10.40itt 4- • ' 44 . ' '•• - It " • , . ` - -. • • ki! '`' 7.0.4,.•"'• 4*••. -So ... r•-• --- _, , -A •A:. s *As., ---_. • -.- •...,,* - . .., . ,...r1 - ., Photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. & Virtually Real, Inc. View Point 9 From near 2463 Elijah's Lane Crane not visible SS' # 74.1k. . , . ti a 44J''' a i . Ilid a — IIK imik. • • 'f L.G.. Photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. & Virtually Real, Inc. View Point 10 From near 1945 Elijah's Lane Existing view ~l ._ itt, . 1164. - �i �. r Photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. & Virtually Real, Inc. View Point 10 From near 1945 Elijah's Lane - ; Rt - .,rw ;4. • Computer simulated photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. & Virtually Real, Inc. View Point 11 From near 1250 Elijah's Lane Existing view ti ' i % r . i t re to y a • � . of — / a. w,to — ;I ` a.� r 1, Y• i A. Photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. & Virtually Real, Inc. View Point 11 From near 1250 Elijah's Lane Arit- `we r it 1F • r I 164. Olt 4 Computer simulated photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. & Virtually Real, Inc. View Point 12 From the intersection of New Suffolk Avenue and Hall's Creek Drive Existin• view _ • - ,' i --:..'ir ,• y). �� fit!r.w, "� . �' }. • r .. - "t p„l'•""':.'.14.•Y .r d vipl It..7:.. . 44:„. . ' ' ti r Y �+1. miP�` +� �1 ?� .7 r , �7 - - _� '4. {' . wr y ► t' ` '�fi •-''1�-4+' is + ' l �_ 1 fi w �.-.. ` ,,,,, * ; y - ear • it Mk 1 a r, y., -v.a .M ,•. y_ ) . .� .J `. Nsu 'ems A. Iv ?i'a : M 11" firif If 011i tili*V.. aart s - • f- F .- w a it ��} Ph r y !y L a or 1 ' " � - • .p k. .. -tib I'.r Ill• ,• ` i. 4414 A s, liti 4 1, T' , y. ) � k ' _'.• J;} 5 4r 'fe.fi�11�• .,,r+ + '` 'f i f s s• • g .A_ s qf 0.3' ^ `� ilt* • is • ` 1. 1fi * .�� '.r' } . f,Y G1�1�. 44 Photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. & Virtually Real, Inc. View Point 12 From the intersection of New7t� Suffolk Avenue and Hall's Creek Drive _ r. :a e 'J ..�T ,rk 7rW'• ..T �f .!( - ., •, J.�,F.r? R c •• Ali ' ' • �•* _.^r i ` '+iyR f�••F 7rtr.Y�ain ; �,V [ .i■, 94V i4'h, `,; .4-,;:_-,.�• !r. ..r.# 4‘1 4. • •�w= -w,f. Ah 4."4 t;^ �-, A`, k ds•�.'. �� c .,�..i s7'j�'�•l' .� •k�'P` • .., ,,.,,,.„,„, . `;7 ,. , .,. , , ,.,: .�• ' ... ,. . ... _ , r", *. 1114` . • ,, . . 4 .*.r.' ....,.., I';'•'' "+7 a.? w }c�1+M •' �� _mo i s• �■•�A 1. 4 .. #r �.41 * .%, +$.. 1e�~_ • _i ` _ I �L'�s� d� �y e.+�.,: • •� '.. w f N ;i -A_„ fit_ ».. .A ' 3 4 . r` r i N. y*if- � / • ,j• tt Jti' R ,..,: . ext' , I .. 4.,..,_ .. .. .... .,*,,.. , 1.wI iYd' s ar Ci t i 611 . f + F 1•�. f' 1 - '--, - , I 1. _ i rt 5. ,`x"s rater, '`y .s • t 41 . to •* .fa a • t 4 • .,.r 4,4 (� A ^1' _ 'r r.,�i !' r. Computer simulated photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. &Virtually Real, Inc. View Point 13 From Route 25, near Locust Avenue Red arrow indicates the location of the top of the crane ` 1� '� .I_ i ` • yy.1 +4r. I �( .; L. 4. `,e' .�' a - :yf a 4' j 'K i 1 1 oak 9 )ar c- s # 'v . . . _. jam. ,f,-,4,,,b... \ '#il''t Trsy ' w 4 � 5+11,4 • . . - - i Photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. & Virtually Real, Inc. APPENDIX C L-, r FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 3 R1-7.4UD IN?HAIL & IAKOWITZ CONSULTING GiOUP, INC. Theresa Elkowitz, President 368 Veterans Memorial Highway Hugo D. Freudenthal (Retired-1994) Commack, New York 11725 Tel: (631) 499-2222 CURRICULUM VITAE Fax: (631) 499-5928 OF THERESA ELKOWITZ OVERVIEW Theresa Elkowitz is the president of Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc. (F&E), an environmental and planning consulting firm. She is well-versed in the State Environmental Review Quality (SEQR) process. Not only has she worked with public and private clients on the administration of the SEQR,but she also serves as Chairperson of the Suffolk County Council on Environmental Quality(CEQ). The CEQ is responsible for recommending SEQR determinations, holding public hearings and administration of the environmental review process for actions proposed by the County of Suffolk. Prior to forming F&E, Mrs. Elkowitz spent several years managing environmental projects for a consulting engineering firm. She has been involved in many diverse projects including the preparation of Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements (EISs), Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs, wetland evaluations, water use and conservation plans, municipal and private planning studies, grant applications,as well as solid waste management plans and Part 360 permit applications. Before entering the field of environmental and planning consulting, Mrs. Elkowitz was employed by the Town of Brookhaven Department of Housing, Community Development and Intergovernmental Affairs. She was responsible for preparing environmental assessments for community development projects in accordance with SEQR Act and the National Environmental Protection Act(NEPA). Representative projects/documents which Mrs. Elkowitz has supervised, prepared and/or had a significant preparatory role include,but are not limited to: DEIS and related SEQR/CEQR Documentation for Kensico Water Pollution Control Program for New York City Department of Environmental Protection; - DEIS and related SEQR/CEQR Documentation for Fresh Kills Landfill for New York City Department of Sanitation; - DEIS for Rezoning of 147+acre Nassau County Property for Nassau County; DEIS and FEIS for Rezoning of 170+acre Roosevelt Raceway for property owner; 2 DEIS and FEIS for development of 22+acre commercial center in Stony Brook for private applicant; - LWRP and environmental and planning tasks for Incorporated Village of Manorhaven; - DEIS and FEIS for 200+ unit Planned Retirement Community in Amityville for private applicant; DGEIS for creation of Incentive Zoning District for the Town of Goshen; DEIS and FEIS for 23+ acre subdivision in the Village of Kings Point for private applicant,USACOE and NYSDEC wetland applications and presentations at public hearings; - DEIS and FEIS for a commercial building in Woodmere,securing of NYSDEC and USACOE wetland permits,presentations at public hearings; Preparation of an EAF and environmental report for a proposed solid waste management recycling facility in Brookhaven; - EAF and Environmental Report for proposed 40 unit residential development for the deaf in Coram; - DEIS and FEIS for residential and commercial development in Riverhead, securing a NYSDEC Freshwater Wetland Permit; - DEIS and FEIS for waterfront condominium complex in Freeport,expert testimony on wetlands and representation of client before Freeport Planning Board,preparation of NYSDEC and USACOE Wetland Applications; DEIS and FEIS for corporate park in Holbrook, data collection and preparation of economic analysis report for proposed corporate park; - DEIS and FEIS for 80 unit residential condominium complex in Coram,preparation of wetland application; - FEIS for an affordable housing development in Riverhead, preparation of an Affordable Housing Corporation Grant Application; DEIS for Lakeville Energy Project Cogeneration Plant in New Hyde Park; 3 DEIS and detailed water use and conservation study for Marriott Hotel expansion, Uniondale, expert testimony associated with SEQR process; - DEIS and FEIS for residential subdivision in Beekman/East Fishkill, expert testimony associated with SEQR process; - DEIS and FEIS for an office condominium complex in Wantagh, expert testimony associated with SEQR process,preparation of NYSDEC freshwater wetland permit application; - DEIS and FEIS for a shopping center in Patchogue,expert testimony associated with SEQR process. EXPERIENCE Principal and Corporate President. Responsible for operations of a multi-disciplined environmental and planning consulting firm. Technical tasks include the preparation of environmental impact statements; environmental assessment forms; site assessments; waterfront revitalization programs;wetland evaluations;planning studies;and various permit applications and related analyses for public and private clients. Environmental presentations and expert testimony before various municipal boards and community groups. Administrative tasks include all business operations, personnel management, budgeting, billing, marketing etc. Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc., 368 Veterans Memorial Highway, Commack,New York. August, 1988 -Present. Environmental Project Manager/Planner. Responsible for the preparation of environmental impact statements, environment assessments and planning studies for private clients and municipalities. Environmental presentations and testimony to Town Boards and Planning Boards. Preparation of various New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,Nassau County Department of Health and Suffolk County Department of Health Services permit applications. Coordination of State Environmental Quality Review procedures. Site evaluations and environmental assessments for real estate developers. Administrative functions including proposal and contract preparation, budget _, analysis, and billing. Supervision of professional and support staff. Baldwin&Cornelius, P.C., 210 Express Street, Plainview,New York. December, 1986 -August, 1988. 4 Neighborhood Aide/Assistant to the Housing Rehabilitation Administrator. Completion of environmental reviews for all Community Development projects in accordance with SEQR and NEPA. Preparation of grant proposals. Assisted in the first affordable housing program for the Town of Brookhaven-the Neighborhood Homes Program. Credit feasibility analyses for SONYMA mortgage applicants. Interviewing for residential rehabilitation, materials grant and townwide handicap ramp programs,evaluation of applications and subsequent loan recommendations. Monitoring and coordinating of the Materials Grant and Townwide Handicap Ramp programs,monitoring of loan repayments and analysis of project income. Solicitation of consultants and engineers for public works projects. Coordination of public works projects and contract compliance with federal regulations. Preparation of budgets and recommendations for policy changes. Town of Brookhaven Department of Housing, Community Development and Intergovernmental Affairs, 3233 Route 112,Medford,New York. November, 1983 -November, 1986. Instructor. Preparation of and teaching biweekly recitations in algebra and introductory microeconomics, private tutorials, assigning and grading homework and examinations. Association for Public Policy and Management Summer Institute for Minority Students,W. Averell Harriman College for Policy Analysis and Public Management, State University of New York at Stony Brook,New York. Summer, 1983, 1984 and 1985. EDUCATION M.S., Policy Analysis and Public Management; W. Averell Harriman College for Policy Analysis and Public Management. May, 1985. B.A., Liberal Arts; State University of New York at Stony Brook. May, 1985. SPECIAL PROJECTS Consultant. Responsible for the formulation, implementation and administration of the Residential Rehabilitation Program for the Incorporated Village of Lake Grove. Tasks include interviewing clients, evaluating applications, program coordination, project monitoring and payments. Fall, 1985 -1987. Graduate Workshop. Statistical analysis of usage of the Mastic-Moriches-Shirley Community Library. Recommendations to the Library's Board of Trustees regarding how to increase community patronage and involvement. Spring, 1984. 5 MEMBERSHIPS Chairperson, Suffolk County Council on Environmental Quality. Environment Committee of the Long Island Association Board of Directors, Long Island Builders Institute HONORS,AWARDS AND DESIGNATIONS Certified Environmental Specialist and Certified Environmental Inspector, Environmental Assessment Association, 1994. Magna Cum Laude Graduate, State University of New York at Stony Brook. May, 1985. Winner, Presidential Management Intern Program. Spring, 1985. J�/ il \ \ CO • JJJ 12 r%-' le ^r cc) / \ I ‘031 1 • \\ J(''JjrJ� ~J� \NYE- `\��S' -.1 RN AD �� \\�90 \ GSE - • Coati J FL •\ • A A i,i' 0 SDS' • a. �:`, 0 \\ Ar1,4 - sc �G� Fs • i F� ^�ti \ \\ P v��E GPS c,O �c ,, , p / N \\ V` t-� // \\\ \ / 1S'\ . Oj r6 N GPR�� N.eb SO ; / / \\ (PS -52' J� ��1.., o /' •, a� 8'di a L UO CD E� p� �J �c� KWti GpRG9 4-2. nen J3`L / o�� ry \ MONOPOLE ON T ' a S DcBa. py 8' D A. CONC. \\\ . ,. P,, . . , '` 0 4.3‘. `\O r April FOUNDATION ^�N 7v P� jDN. \ hJ Y� �TeN- eYI �.../ ^4 Co / 4)G • / ��. i a" ,01 I �ZF �• r' Oil' O° .- c S- GtiE $1 � . As tiJ� � a, � � �� \ •y • cc , / �� LAG h g\oG� \ ,Cr \\ '; •1S` / GSA �\�� \ 0G S�oR�O\NG s0 "1" atY,i ,0a' `t — efr N rJ. (Co v'. S cx v 3' `Loth A. 2 U / 'oma / z, 2 s S 8 .55 MAIN � \ SR25 _ . EE pQ RD . LEGEND N • 0 UNKOWN UTILITY MANHOLE \ (a UNKOWN VALVE `D ) UTILITY POLE 32.48 EXIST. SPOT ELEVATION �\P -Thr — sr HEDGE LINE OF BRIARS Date Revisions TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF EOFNE PROPERTY IN UNAUTHOPIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO AEALIAV BEARING A LICENSED LAND CTION ORS - qtiMATTITUCK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N.Y. SEAL IS A VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 134, SECTION7209, SUBDIVISION 2, OF THE NEW YORK STATE - -tit' O CO EDUCATION LAW" °,„`. e1,r, SUFFOLK COUNTY LAND & TAX MAP "Copies frim the or,g nal of this su ev map ,t'y;J DIST 1000, SEC. 108, BLK. 4, LOT 11.3 O not marked with an original of the land 0 "THE OFFSETS (OR DIMENSIONS) SHOWN surveyor's inked seal or his embossed sec! C. 0 HEREON FRO�.1 THE STRUCTURES TO THE p�'' - �� N� fir)- �O� _O LINES SPECIFIC shall not be consld=red a valid true co a PURPOSE+AND USER AND THEREFORE APE th,s scat on indicated hereon signify that 8 this survey was prepared in accordance with �S` J NOT INTENDED TO GUIDE THE ERECTION the existing Code of Practice for Land Sarver - - -- F�IANDSVR w CARMAN-DUNNE P . C . OF FENCES, RETAINING WALLS, Ri'JLS, adopted by the New York State , and of CONSULTING EN GI1�E1✓�RS & SURVEYORS o PATIOS, PLANTING AREA, ADDITION TO Professonal Land Surveyors Said - ---- --- ------- 0 certifications shall run only tc the person 2 Lakeview ' BUILDINGS OR ANY OTHER CONSTRUCTIONAvenue, ,Lvri on-1c, New York: for whom the survey is prepared, and on his � ”- -� behalf to the title company, governmental Date: (516) 599-5563 - Z1/22e.___,...._, FAX (516) 5° 01 agency and lending inst tution. �--5. O EASEMENTS IN EYISTENCE OR OF RECORD, Cert.fications are not transferable to IF ANY, NOT SHOWN additional institutions or subsequent owners " AUG. 13, 1999 JOHNTQSCA"'J / / ,� l _o Scale: Plate No. : Project No.: v 1 "=30' 181 991 4800 Sheet 1 o — V , 1 ti t: .a �ffY�k 9 � IS 0 4 , .40.iP"-. of=1 PAPAY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC. 100 HILLTOP ROAD, Rf1MSEY, NJ 07446 201-934-2828 , NOFE - co) wit . . 1s __.4 ,6.....s • sprrorlia Spec:R [r (lim L . FA.) . • n t t .......................,,,,„„,„„::::„ ,,1,4%44 ai4.:'::::::::§#:: --77, 0 Sprint Spectrum L.P. — SPRINT IMPLEIv NTATI N: AMY NOLLER Crossroads Corporate Center 1 International Blvd., Ste. 800 Mahwah, New Jersey 07495 (201 ) 684-4009 Phone: (201 ) 512-4700 Fax: (201) 512-4713 VERIZON: JOH\ GOMEZ A 1 750-1454 .\ Ko. _ \ 11 E 0 (917) ., .1 NA AT&T WIRELESS COLOCATIO1: ALEX DEFRANC1S \,.---------" % 201 576-2255 . MiSrli wireless POWER: <EYSPAN - 30B DELANEY (FILE: 65339040) (631 ) 548-7043 60 HERRICKS ROAD MINEOLA, NY 11501 1 0 TELCO: CO\RAD HOE\IG ..- \ 0 _ .� t ..�. (51 fi) 294-1090. (631 ) 687-8522 PROJECT NUMBER 1239 1 7— all DRAWN BY SWITC I. (5 6) 82 2800 SITE: WILLIAM BAXTER J.D.P. CHEC D BY (561 ) 225— 4492 P.E.P. A/E: PETER PAPAY NO DATE ISSUE 0 07/12/00 APPRov�. (201) 934-282.8 a688/958283 SITE NUM3ER. \Y33XC688/958283 CJ ,CT CC \TACTS % SITE ADDRESS: ELIJAH'S _A\E & ROUTE 25 -- % SOUTHOLD, NY OWNER: WILLIAM J. 3AXTER, JR. 1030 E. PUTNAM AVENUE % GREENWICH, CT 06830 :•%' U i,...- -. :_%% <'' �\ •'s�\o' .- ° - 3Z- 'L CO—APPLICANTS: SPRINT SPECTRUVI L.P. -- ,•� _ :, r -...„ o;: it a 9 V'. Q / CROSSROADSCORPORATE` ' ' •a;;t ti o vo _ 0 E C EN TER •-- Qei:�/`' 7 •, Nif,52:-'-'7>4<1----r'' o.�o ,. � •• _ - _ IT, - % SHEET REVISION J,...;„i �i� ° ",,,, ,- \;,igh`'g -, _a u \, ii,. % 1 I\TERNATIONAL BLVD•, STE. 800 DESCRIPTION" ► / NUMBER DATEv /9 , � '',-%.' li, •�s�h�'�:���_;"�� ':. _�-=� I,. , ��:;-- � APPROVALS ? -�ti\��o_ - `a-t % �AHWAH, NJ 07495 f TITLE SHEET „ - h �� o 24- / / T- 1 07/12/00 ,. �N: rratooka ' �s'' — 2a. 8 PROJECT MANAGER: DATE: - ,. Pond k - ' 1q , 4° ••j', , 3 • 2 rb _ �a -1 \YS VISA LIMITED PARTNESHIP • _• � �' %; % s •� - ` % S- 1 SITE PLAN AND NOTES 00 SPRINT REP: DATE: toil% .- � ' -;�. I - r'_ D3A: VERIZON WIRELESS // 07/12/ o . �41 ®:--� �:_, ; - :A; �a ti 1 �t ��— VERIZON REP: DATE: y! :No- -_ : ,�3 ..n ./ ; o,��, ' FKA: 3ELL ATLANTIC IV �� - �4 . „ ;11,-_,; �_�: . S- 1 A <EY MAP 07/12/00 _ :�/.�:•` •`�.6; °:: ' •tat- / 3 - I ,,;,2—, ,_!J �. 5' 60 HERRICKS ROAD •j6 r 1,• .;'--1` - to � : : ; ` MINEOLA, \Y 11501 S-2 COMPOUND P� , ELEVATION AND DETAILS 07 12 00 NIA_ ` ,Airport - - • ; Marratoc N / / TTTUVK l r.......`� � t. ! \ t • !� c. . Point �- ,� c ),; ; % LEGAL DESC;IPTION: ,�1 rti 30,- a A,• :.''''..";-•/;:-;-"--- '.,,j= `,Q.o :C c6�-ia- ", ,2 % S-3 SITE NUMBER: �:, 'ate: =(� - - :' r :-Via,.,:- `., BEING ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND AND PREMISES // DETAILS 07 12 00 c'',-2- r �:: - �_- _=� _ �„l:, .- z;::,,.s. % j1 / NY33xC688 95 // ,may;:., . ; n� � t, -� / / 8283 _s.-;--. �.� . �.`� �;. �,..,. / LOCATED I� THE STATE OF NEW YORK I\ THE COUNTY OF SUFFOL< AND / _� t^ �3r k \--,.:-,-- iGty � 4 '�,- S T 5� DE AI LS •I'. 7 0 1 . •.� .� 2 00 SITE a• �;, ADDRESS: / cI+ / � '� A W N T 11 . I N K / WN F TH NO AS LO 3 LOC 4 T � i T 0 SOU OLD 3 SECTIO 1 0 08 / �fA tr°t / ,.ya- .tA}vw ./ O ,.1% Fri' -yttl^".^ / '�` 'fit 9�i..i^p� +.1-1 4 •� f.�ua`3 -� � -n- -a. � :� . r. LIJAH S N ,: ..... ��. ==�� � : }'. ���� DISTRICT 1000. / -,;-‘,.-,45c--:::— - •4 \\\. .,'.,_,a .-''A..,+•f•"•f:Y4 Yx 4't `.'T •n_: '�•:t ..+ i i.• .� %;x%:'>t- "i` e,.^s ,'•6 / SOUTHOLD, NY .�• _g• :'i! •:'k 4>'iru :"e. e*;�Y` i:'-`- �-'`y, - -,.. ,:c,...::::--..- : rt:-_: :. f 4 =� _ -� •- - - T \A LATITUDE: 40° 59' 57.9 LONGITUDE: 72° 30' 39• / '�= .� ::, � .�- ��: ,..� a�� , ���:�-.�.�...:�':�� :-'.;•c ;_:.. // COORDI\A ES ( D 83): 2 // '__J L / ; . 3 tea.; , h:..; / / BLOCK � � ituc&-Flack -'k"� _+* �'",: , - 1tst w. te ` / / / / DIST. o 00 / 08 AM // 30 SL VAT N/ ELE 0 / BL00/ K4LOE $l .3 �a f1 :T tic / Y� rt£ Ci�m 'i` LIMITED3USINESS p' / 3U ES �� LB S ���,� g R R T ZONING:EN 0 G" .;� CU Z �4 t m ate 'a u .ur-. / VIC ITY MAS SCALE: 1 "=2000' % OJ ECT S �, V vA Y - % S ET I \ D'--X / "SHEET TITLE TITLE SHEET PETER E. PAPAY PAS of NEW YOR,I Q ,,, t :4 UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION ORt it ADDITION TO THIS DOCUMENT IS --,4*-"-- ,4k A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209e. % 06�60�0 C,�'�. OF THE NEW YORK STATE ysFoPROFESSIONP�i" EDUCATION LAW. N.Y. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NO, 064690 EXISTING UTILITY GENERALCONSTRUCTION NOTES ^-) POLE (TYP.) r 1. HE PROPOSED FACILITY IS UN-MANNED AND VISITED APPROXIMATELY ONCE A MONTH r A FOR ROUTINE MAINTENANCE. THEREFORE, POTABLE WATER, GAS AND SANITARY SEWER ,. SERVICES ARE NOT REQUIRED NCR PROPOSED. NO SOLID WASTE IS GENERATED. I_ .._. J •/ \ / 2. THE SITE AREA IS GENERALLY FLAT IN TOPOGRAPHY. THE INCREASE IN STORM WATER ANTENNA SCHEDULE (ALL CARRIERS) f'(, ,/,' \ �`���, 1 RUNOFF DUE TO THE INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS AREA IS INSIGNIFICANT. EXISTING r-) / ,`fle• /• �/ DRAINAGE PATTERNS WILL NOT BE ALTERED. THEREFORE, NEW DRAINAGE STRUCTURES CARRIER ANTENNA MODEL AND STATUS ELEVATION CONNELLY & MASTON 2: \19Sv ARE N07 PROPOSED. RE-GRADING IS NOT PROPOSED 1• «/UTHS 535 ELIJAH'S LANE �\e• / �is,, 3. SITE PLAN INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS TAKEN FROM A DRAWING ENTITLED /� MATTITUCK, NY 11952 !� / "TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF PROPERTY IN MATTITUCK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N.Y." 4 SPRINT DB980H90T2EM (PROPOSED) 110' (TOPS) 3 3 340, 110, 230 GPS UNIT AT 110' ,�' \ / PREPARED BY CARMAN-DUNNE P.C., LYNBROOK, NY, DATED AUGUST 13, 1999. CURRENTLY THREE ANTENNAS EXIST PER r-i/'� L� AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES ALP 11011-N (EXISTING) 98' (CENTERLINE) 3 4 50, 150, 240 J \ / 4. ADDITIONAL SIGNS ARE NOT PROPOSED. SECTOR. FOUR ARE PROPOSED PER SECTOR. �- / ,j, \ I. �y �'9 5. ADDITIONAL PLANTINGS ARE NOT PROPOSED. NEXTEL SMR-08-09011-0D (PROPOSED) 90' (TOPS) 3 4 30, 150, 270 EXISTING WHIPS ON EXISTING POLE TO BE �ti j' '��' \, -147 �a� F` REPLACED WITH PANEL ANTENNAS SHOWN HERE �0 �Q 6. TWO, TWO-LAMP. PHOTOCELL 8c MOTION-DETECTOR CONTROLLED, TIME-LIMITED LIGHT `Q� 1/ \� FIXTURES ARE PROPOSED TO OPERATE FROM DUSK TO DAWN, BY THE DETECTION OF PAPAY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC. VERIZON WIRELESS ALP9011 E (PROPOSED) 80' (TOPS) 3 4 102, 222, 342 GPS UNIT AT SHELTER ROOF _I MOVEMENT, ONE NEAR THE SPRINT EQUIPMENT, AND ONE ON THE VERIZON EQUIPMENT ✓'(" / `��' SHELTER 100 HILLTOP ROAD, RAMSEY, NJ 07446 MOUNTED TIGHT TO POLE USING TRI-BRACKET J s� 201-934-2828 OMNIPOINT EMS RR90-it-OODP (EXISTING) 65' (TOPS) 3 1 30, 150, 270 ASSEMBLIES AND TRI-SECTOR ASSEMBLIES . .'/ 7. SPRINT AND VERIZON WILL ACCESS THE COMPOUND BY AGREEMENT. NO ��0�JF� �4j �\¢�rj. ...-- \ i ' NEW RIGHTS OF WAY OR EASEMENTS ARE PROPOSED. -J/ tij� / B. PLANS ARE NOT TO BE SCALED. THEE PLANS ARE INTENDED TO BE A DIAGRAMMATIC NORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING ALL J/ O��RN,P� /• MATERIALS,OUTLINE NEQUIPMENT, APPURTENANCES, LABOR LY UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THE WAND TEMPORARY MEASURES NECESSARY \\\ -2,/.�/' \ �• ,\ TO EFFECT ALL INSTALLATIONS AS INDICATED ON THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. • 2 ,� / 9. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF A BID, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE PROJECT SITE \ J ' / pM \`. �� AND FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH ALL CONDITIONS AFFECTING THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION ......Z. 1....7.•S ��. a \ u'� AND INSTALLATION OF ALL PROPOSED MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND REMOVAL/ . ..iL..ii' 1.------I J \ •/ 1,4)' GP-©0 4) DEMOLITION OF EXISTING ITEMS SHOWN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE PROVISIONS ----77 - {Ng W �� \ FOR THE COST OF SUCH CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR C9 (approx.) \ bc'1h/ FAMILIARIZING HIMSELF WITH ALL CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, FIELD CONDITIONS AND \ Dc \ 4� DIMENSIONS. SUBMISSION OF A BID BY THE CONTRACTOR GUARANTEES THAT ALL �► • ,/ �y�' `�\ �� / WORK MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED AS DEPICTED ON THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. Sprint Spectrum L.P. �' t. �°> `Sc' 10. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FINISH SURFACES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SPACING Crossroads Corporate Center / „Tay \,, / BETWEEN EQUIPMENT IS REQUIRED CLEARANCE. THEREFORE, IT IS CRITICAL TO FIELD 1 International Blvd., Ste. 800 • VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS. SHOULD THERE BE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE CONTRACT \ Mahwah New Jersey07495 / 2 / DOCUMENTS, EXISTING CONDITIONS OR DESIGN INTENT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE /' ,\�j •Q6 /• RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING WRITTEN CLARIFICATION FROM THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER Phone: (201) 512-4700 4.6-,,,,j,. �� `�` PRIOR TO PROCEEDING 'INH THE WORK. Fax: (2O 1) 512-4713 110" GPS g0 `. / 11. HE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL CLARIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZATIONS IN ,\� 'S1'' \` / , WRITING BEFORE STARTING WORK ON ANY ITEM NOT CLEARLY DEFINED OR IDENTIFIED 230' O� ,/• \` BY THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. SPRINT ORIENTATION •\P�' ;/ Q co` EXIST.POUTILITY \` // 12. INSTALL ALL INSTRUCTIONS,EQUIPMENT SPE®IFICALLY OTHERWISE ATERIALS IN OINDICATEDWITH OR WHERE LOCAL CODES / 6' Nlb OR REGULATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE. / ' \0' ..'I \ �� 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OF ALL PRODUCTS OR HUNTER • true \ 55 SUNDANCE DRIVE / 0 �p\� Gp� S� �/� / ``\ ITEMS NOTED AS "EXISTING` WHICH ARE NOT FOUND TO BE IN THE FIELD. \\14..........:°.................' p UNDERGROUND �, , (approx.) \ COS COD, CT 06807-1809 p �� UTILITIES �� ^ / 14. ALL WORK PERFORMED AND MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE �/0 wireless ---\ 1 ( �/ t WITH All APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS AND ORCINNCES HAVING JURISDICTION. \ -0C1\)4' G S� tij�'• / .' CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE All NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, 342' N.111. /% \c'� �Q� ,/ RULES, REGULATIONS ANO LAWFUL ORDERS Of ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY BEARING ON 60 HERRICKS ROAD �'I� �� ��1 I HE PERFORMANCE AND EXECUTION OF THE WORK. ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS SHALL BE M I N EO LA, NY 1 1501 LIMIT OF �A �s / / CODES, THE NATIONALANCE WITH ALL APPUCABLE MUNICIPALELECTRIC CODE, AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS.D STATE JURISDICTIONAL (516) 294-1090 \ j CLEARING Fes. �^ �� /' EXIST. LIPA N S C,P�p ��,' �^ Ems'` . ,/' ea NDERGROUND 15. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL CITY, STATE AND 102• '\ / `��- 0, '-5 4.) ���` •-' b��' SPLICE BOX O.S.H.A SAFETY REQUIREMENTS. ' $��5� 6/�/ �c1 %/ / 16. ALL ITEMS CONCEALMENT REQUIRING ISUCH ITEMS. SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO PROJECT NUMBER t. / '/ ��©�� � `!ice jt ''' / 17. DURING THE COURSE OF THE WORK, THE PFctOPERTY OWNERS HIS EMPLOYEES, 1239 222' / 7 \ ) w. ,/ ( ��, ( ). DRAWN BY VERIZON ORIENTATION Gj Q��$ /* ^7 tij`1' .�` S� -7t/ ,/' �9 `��J USETHE FACILIITYTANDEPRE SES.DTHEiCO TRACTOR SHAH SCHEDULE ANDS ��\P */ ,� \ bq a�}, gyp, .V:.7' ,d/e' ry ©/ G��s COORDINATE THE WORK ACCORDINGLY. D P / * $� ny �/ \C'p9�y 18. THE DESIGN, SPECIFICATION, PERFORMANCE AND INSTALLATION OF RADIO EQUIPMENT CHECKED BY + \ E / ") iv FFA S WITHIN THE EQUIPMENT ROOM ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF OTHERS. THE CONTRACTOR P E P • ��c� / + ` �c� ��, /% p/ ,\ SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING HIS WORK WITH THE WORK OF OTHERS • \P / ry �'' AS IT MAY RELATE TO RADIO EQUIPMENT AND OTHER PORTIONS OF THE WORK / �� , cy , t` N �� �/ i/ /� / A'l�' - WHICH ARE PERFORMED BY OTHERS. NO DATE ISSUE • NEIGHLEY / *� r�� y ' �o• r �� \�� �/s ' / ,r t. / 19. SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH FIRE RATED ASSEMBLIES WITH U.L. LISTED AND FIRE 27 CASE AVENUE / A;\1 �Q �c� ,/ • CODE APPROVED MATERIALS. ALL EXTERIOR PENETRATIONS SHALL BE WEATHERPROOF. 0 07/12/00 APPROVAL PATCHOGUE, NY 11772 , r + `�.. e 4 \ G cj\0��� �,/ 20. DETAILS ARE INTENDED 10 SHOW END RESULT OF DESIGN. MINOR MODIFICATIONS MAY / '� � / BE REQUIRED TO SUIT JOB DIMENSIONS OR CONDITIONS. SUCH MODIFICATIONS SHALL �� /.' + %y +/ "p BOO \ �'` $Q.�\, \ y'�' �I\S ���/ ��/' BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE WORK. 1 F'' ��� �/s co /' 21. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ALL NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT ALL EXISTING ��� / COMPOUND Aillih. / t. . "6' r�� r\ �/s/ �� / ' EQUIPMENT, TOOLS AND NORMAL CONSTFe�1CTlOECT SITE FROM DAMAGE N ACTIIVITYBY HFOR THE DURATION OFE HANDLING OF I THES ' ' ;/ PLAN coA) `� �� r`'�.r \�` / </ /'� ��\O�� WORK. ALL EFFECTED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION ,1� ELY , ~/�......./- / / $����AP UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK. / p ,/ l's 22. KEEP PROJECT AREA CLEAN AND HAZARD FREE THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE �� 3 T_ �� / WORK. DISPOSE OF ALL DEBRIS, RUBBISH, EQUIPMENT REMOVED AND NOT SPECIFIED TO REMAIN ON THE PROPERTY OF THE OWNER. LEAVE PREMISES IN A FIRST CLASS %' V. O� / "DN �� /' CLEAN CONDITION, FREE FROM PAINT SPOTS, DUST, OR SMUDGES OF ANY NATURE. ^j + �0 ^�,/ REPAIR AND PAINT ALL EXISTING SURFACES THAT HAVE BEEN DAMAGED OR OTHERWISE \ �,/ ��' �^D +V ")'N' ^ / y�\0�' EFFECTED BY THE WORK SUCH THAT THEY BLEND WITH ADJACENT SURFACES. / \ a �� /�� SPOT G 23. HE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ALL CUTTING AND PATCHING AS REQUIRED TO (� �` EXISTING 1 STORY \ \\Q\� PROVIDE ACCESS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF VARIOUS PARTS OF THE WORK. ALL �� BLOCK TELECOM �Q HOLES IN MASONRY OR CONCRETE SURFACES SHALL BE CORE-DRILLED OR SAW-CUT. \• / �� BUILDING TO REMAIN,'' �O ALL CUTS SHALL BE LOCATED AND EXECUTED SUCH THAT THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY + OF THE SURFACE IS NOT COMPROMISED. \ / • ,/~ '. 24. DO NOT DEVIATE FROM MANUFACTURERS LISTED WITHIN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, APPROVALS \ / + +/ a %''• UNLEFOR SUCHNDEVIATBLE. OBTAIN PRIOR APPROVAL FROM CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PROJECT MANAGER: DATE: \\ ,%�' 4� i. EXISTING 1 STORY �� /'' 25. HE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE WORK USING THE BEST SPRINT REP: EV b. AGGREGATE TELECOM ,""1" CONSTRUCTION SKILLS AND ATTENTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY DATE: `>k� \ �o,� BUILDING TO REMAIN �o° RESPONSIBLE AND HAVE CONTROL OVER CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS • / ,�. TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES AND PROCEDURES AND FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS VERIZON REP: DATE: �� �' /'' ") OF THE WORK UNDER CONTRACT, UNLESS CONTRACT DOCUMENTS GIVE OTHER / SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS CONCERNING CERTAIN MATTERS. �P ,•'7. 26. DELVER ALL MAINTENANCE AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS AND SPARE PARTS TO THE SITE NAME CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. \ 27. ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP PROVIDED UNDER THIS CONTRACT SHALL BE MATTITUCK *�,.'/ <c3'. GUARANTEED TO BE FREE FROM DEFECTS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTER •IS p';/ �4) `ti�1' p � ORSU�REQUI DTANTIAL COMPLETION, OR E SEWHERE WITHIN N HER CONTRACTIF EDOCUM NTS ANY DEF C FANCIES D BY EQUIPMENT THAT SItE NUMBER �/ ' � • / SATIS ACTION OF HBECOME EVIDENT SE(CONSTRUCTION MANAGERNG THE GUARANTEE IOA TD HELCO TRACTORL BE 'S EXPEENSETED TO E NY33 0688/958283 ' �� '' BULK REQUIREMENTS ALL EXISTING ROOF OR OTHER BUILDING WARRANTIES SHALL REMAIN �! EFFECT AND / 1P ' INTACT DURING THE COIRSE OF THE WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE %/ WITH SAID GUARANTOR(S) SUCH THAT THOSE WARRANTIES ARE MAINTAINED. SITE ADDRESS: ' ZONING DISTRICT: LB - LIMITED BUSINESS 28. LOCATE AND MARK-OUT ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES THROUGH THE ELIJAH S LANE & RT 25 USE OF A UTILITY LOCATING SERVICE PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION WORK. HAND DIG IN SOUTHOLD NY ./� \\� PERMITTED OR AREAS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND/OR STRUCTURES. ' o LOT 11.3, BLOCK 4,SECT 108, DISC 1000 EXISTING PROPOSED 29. THIS SET OF PLANS SHALL NOT BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT HAS BEEN 7,A ; c / ,\ \O REQUIRED �s9 "1, / ti� ��� MIN. LOT AREA (SQ, FT,) 80,000 80,507 NO CHANGE DEPICTED AS SUCH IN THE ISSUE BLOCK. BLOCK & LOT: \. // 30. ALL�WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH NEW YORK STATE ENERGY CONSERVATION CONSTRUCTCON DIST. 1000, SEC. 108 \` WILLIAM J. BAXTER, JR. ADN. LOT WIDTH (Fila) 175 197.5 NO CHANGE BLOCK 4 LOT `\,� ,� 1030 EAST PUTNAM AVENUE MIN, LOT DEPTH (FEET) 250 474.2 NO CHANGE D 11 .3 \, i.-' GREENWICH, CT 06830PLN RP R ODDON `\,, ,/ MIN. FRONT YARD (FEET) 100 76.2 NO CHANGE N` 25 Q� 315 RACHELS ROAD �, /''' MIN. SIDE YARD, ONE/BOTH (FEET) 20/45 4.6/59.4 NO CHANGE ,c,\(----,...,���N MATTITUCK, NY 11952 0,N, , / P1-C,l ` \,, , / ADN. REAR YARD (FEET) 75 231 NO CHANGE �, ► SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE AREA (%) 35 >54 —2.16 SHEET TITLE /,/ ``\ /,V SCALE; 1"-20' LOT COVERAGE y ( ) 20 12.6 +.6 / \ '� MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT (FEET) 35 100 110 , ,•-,-- / GRAPHIC SCALE — SITE PLAN AND NOTES PETER E. PAPAY / tit9 ?,,�st6, 7„ /- ,, 20 a 10 20 40 80 g� /' ism Int /// ,�S�fY\ /'” -OEM M � LEGEND OF NEW r® \7Q� `�\ -4</ ' ) LIGHT LINES DENOTE EXISTING CONDITIONS ~ P� /�,�g�a 1 inch =a 20 !t, .2 AA,y� SHEET NUM3ER /,SHEAVY LINES DENOTE PROPOSED CONDITIONS ,•.� ; HILLIARD & GONZALEZ UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR P.O. BOX 2483 —E— POWER WIRING Y` `' ;c ` NEW BOXFO4K, NY 11956 ADDITION TO THIS DOCUMENT IS ` —T— TELEPHONE WIRING A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 - `-F 4, 06Gc9° `,, N \ - • — - EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES OF THE NEW YORK STATE r ,. S ____ i sro 1 ''`,. —,31-- EXISTING CONTOUR EDUCATION LAW. FROFEs�so N.Y. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NO. 064690 h's•I true NOTE: FM OBSTRUCTION MARKING DETERMINATION IS A {approx.} PENDING, CONTACT SPRINT FOR FM OBSTRUCTION GALE411) MARKING AND FAILURE MONITORING REQUIREMENTS, EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED '� -- 340' �� SPRINS {TMP, FOR 3} S_ UNIT ® 110' -- r - -- - WAVEGUIDE CHANNEL MODEL B501 FAA STROBE AND I • • • • AS MF'D BY MICROFLECT MARKER LIGHTS 10000 a p I WAVEGUIDE CHANNEL TO 12' X 30' VERIZON a PROVIDE SURFACE TREATMENT SPRINT PANEL ANTENNA I i itia EQUIPMENT SHELTER _4110 t (TZ'P, FOR 9, 6 SHOWN} Al ' PIPE HEAD JUMPER Nip. ANTHIN'cno BEYOND vr DEXTEN51oN 110' 1�11'I1111 COAXIAL CABLES o 230 PIPE HEAD MODEL 6509 AS RELOCATE (9) AT&T ANTENNAS. INSTALL Wi I t�1GERS (TMP.)-- AND I o D BY MICROFLECT SPRINT ORIENTATI01� 1::, t 3M10140: STD° WT. PIPE � 4 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES 98'f I�I-11:11-1-1-11:1-41 I_) _I_ _/'(�} NEW ANTE7JNA PER SECTOR. MAINTAIN ) .�o illie* 4 HORIZONTAIL SEPARATION AND LIGHTINSPRINT PPCG ABINETE Aillik 419 �� ��®�v�� /`` % \ Npr(SIMILAR) ��true 90'± ! TRAPEZE ® 4'-0*a% o I O' O/C.) lirS���0 �` \ (approx,) �-�-�--I-'-�-� ' NEXTEL PANEL ANTENNA } QQOQ (31/2* 0. E S_ (TMP, RSUPPORT CLAMP MODEL PAPAY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC. CANOPY OVER / SEE NOTE #1 80 BURNDY TYPE B142 100 HILLTOPORO 934-2 28, NJ o744s EQUIPMENT * / 6 MAPLE ��� 342' �'�'�'-,�'�'') 3 VERIZON PANEL ANTENNA CLAMP I I MICROFLECT SNAP-IN ADAPTER MODEL B1717 �`/ 1Z S-4 (TMP. FOR 12, 8 SHOWN) BOND TO GROUND in SLOpe EXISTING �/ *07, ELECTRIC & • ,S � TELEPHONE AREA102, 65 RELOCATED OMNIPOINTRING e :. + , GRADE x ^ / \ Q ANTENNA (TMP. FOR 3) \//\\K\/\\/ I� ��\\�\�`x , w 11 1 K �'/ iiiik,� � 222' 110' REPLACEMENT �� ;� �: I.... � �// Com► 0 BIACMONOPOLE. SEE NOTES \ I : I. '� .....z\...... " AS �' WALNUT p`� x `" � VERIZON ORIENTATION >/ •.. . ..l. . I. ^// --"177 frint ' =� '/ p SPRINT EQUIPMENT 456 EXISTING NEXTEL EQUIPMENT \ ' Q. •-...\-\,/y_4000° PS! �. 1101 1 ON CONCRETE H \/ ,° � �' \IS x �F' �p'� `" 4 UNDERGROUND _3 S ELTER (BEYOND) �\ I ..(. / CONCRETEG��� NG S�� UT�JTIESPIERS W/ CANOPY \ a_° I °• ! . .%�EXISTING OMNIPOINT \ j ��5�\ Qp� °� Nir EXISTING AT&T E UIPMENT CABLE 49 :a Sprint SpGCtrum L.P.+ `�� �' ��� /� Q BRI " �\ ( \� Crossroads Corporate EQUIPMENT ON F�` \ SHELTER (BEYOND) Com'.} >/�,. // PDGE � � ate Center CONCRETE PAD f \ ' "' \ a :°.a �' • ° \� 1 International Blvd., Ste. 800 \ ' i \/ :I•• ' ' ./ Mahwah, New Jersey 07495 rf \ EXISTING UIMNTR 7-0 HIGH CHAIN IJNK FENCE /SPRINT EQUIPMENT AB ESINCNDUIT UNDERGROUNDIlliih' �\ GPS (TO MATCH EXISTING) / ' 456 Ia: I a \� ON CONCRETE f �* EXISTING OMNIPOINT \� `I I ; �/� PIERS ir Oahe �� l ,. , i EQUIPMENT ON CONCRETE >j ° �1 �// `. / -- - ice PAD � b ; \ \ i i Pi:��i ii:i:i:ii:iii:�i0'�:iii:�Ki."%%:.�����i+%���� ii yi�i�:�%�i 4':i�i� • -/ • °.. • \\/ 7-0 HIGH CHAIN-UN� ................,.... ........a. ...4.. .. ►... .. %-�f��� �/\� FENCE (TO MATCH T \�. 1) �1 f PROVIDE POWER FOR \ �r\\r\\r\\r\\r� EXISTING T P� \ ‘011111 FAA LIGHTING PSQR*�N� ., 1 -0 _ ESS r\rQP \� :!1E!ELELITY POLE ELEVATION CABLE BRIDGE , • �.� - T CABLE BRIDGEt \ \ _ P � r , � EXITELCO SCALE: 1's=20' 60 HERRICKS R (m'•) S_� S���y\�ES POLE MAY 11501 QTES:1. SEE SEQUENCE BELOW FOR ANTICIPATED SEQUENCE OF 1.PROVIDE SNAP-IN ADAPTERS AND PIPE LEG r \ �] UIOUTILI1( g MONOPOLE REPLACEMENT EVENTS, SUPPORT CLAMPS AS REQUIRED TO ROUTE PROJECT NUMICER ' � �'� CABLES TO SPRINT EQUIPMENT. 110 REPLACEMENT \�\ r s_- 2. SEE REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE MANUFACTURER'S DRAWINGS FOR MONOPOLE 4 APPROXIMATE LOCATION 1239 REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE FOUNDATION DRAWINGS AND DETAILS. DRAWN BY \ .� F UNDERGROUND SPLICE 1 X 1 STAKE 5' 0 C .\� .. BOX BY BELL ATLANTIC / J.D.P. X 6 PRESSURE TREATED DENSE GRADED AGGREGATE, CHECKED BY EXISTING 100' MONOPOLE \ . \ � TO BE REMOVED LUMBER AT FULL PERIMETER MATCH EXiST1NG %� 0 w OF NEW SURFACE TREATMENT P.E.P. PROVIDE NEW CABLE ENTRY! PORT \.,, 0 ° . /i. EXISTING 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK . V OP®LE REPLACEMENT SEQUENCE Q EVENTS y NO DATE ON BOTH SIDES OF WALL IMICROFLECT Nr,-© x FENCE W/ 1 OF BARBED WIRE '% Liy...a. ••' �' -� - ISSUE MODEL 81118 \ 0 sl. , x'� 1. MEET WITH EACH CARRIER ON SITE TO DISCUSS CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. ` � ������ ��` N. N. . � w 0 07/12/00 APPROVAL \ ��\�,\����� SNE � + x 2. INSTALL NEW MONOPOLE FOUNDATION, REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE, ANTENNA MOUNTS,, GROUNDING FIRM UNYIELDING FILTER FABRIC. MIRAFl 500X t E\\Q x EXISTING WHITE ACCESSORIES AND FAA LIGHTING. \ ® x/ PINE (TMP.) SUBGRADE OR APPROVED EQUAL /*,, -* 3. INSTALL AND GROUND NEW ANTENNAS ''OR ALL CARRIERS ON REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE. * EXISTING RED NEW ANTENNAS SHALL BE IDENTICAL TO THE EXISTING ANTENNAS (EXCEPT NEXTEL). MATCH EXISTING ,© SURFACE TREATMENT DETAIL \\Gx /,, CEDAR (TYP.) AZIMUTHS AND DOWNTILT ANGLES. NEXTEL ANTENNAS SHALL BE REPLACED AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. ' SCALE: NONE \----'* 4. INSTALL NEW AND EXTENDED CABLE SUPPORT BRIDGES. Nry NOTES: 5. INSTALL AND GROUND NEW CABLES FOR ALL CARRIERS AND ANTENNAS. 1, PROVIDE SURFACE TREATMENT WITHIN ENTIRE FENCED NEW CABLES SHALL BE IDENTICAL TO THE EXISTING CABLES FOR MAKE AND SIZE. COMPOUND AND 1'-0" BEYOND, ON ALL SIDES. 9 COMPOUND PLAN 6. SWEEP TEST NEW CABLES. SCALE; 1"=10' 7. COORDINATE CABLE CHANGEOVER WITH EACH CARRIER. CAULK OPENINGS WITH B195 ALUMILASTIC SEALANT GRAPHIC SCALE EXISTING CEILING APPROVALS 8. DISMANTLE AND REMOVE EXISTING CABLES AND ANTENNAS FROM EXISTING MONOPOLE. APPLY "PERMAGUM B184 SEALING TAPE 10 o s 10 20 40 'N WALL OPENING BEFORE WAVEGUIDE N . 9. DISMANTLE AND REMOVE EXISTING MONOPOLE. ENTRY PORT INSTALLATION PROJECT MANAGER: DATE: ( DJ FEET ) SPRINT REP: DATE: 1 inch = 10 VERIZON REP: DATE: _ I. I PROVIDE WAVEGUIDE BOOT & FILTER FABRIC. MIRAFl 500X COORDINATE TERMINATION , 1 ]-- CUSHIONS (TYP.) ~- OR APPROVED EQUAL POINT OF ANTENNA --' PROVIDE SEALING CABLES WITH AT&T [ 1 NAME: OPENINGS (TYp,) CAPS AT UNUSED SITE MATT SURFACE MATCH EXISTING SURFACE I TU C K • TREATMENTTREATMENT IN OTHER AREAS ;1111 MICROFLECT WAVEGUIDE ENTRY PORT A PROVIDE WARNING MODEL #61118 (TYP, BOTH SIDES) Slit NUMBER: WELDED 1 5�8" O.D. ACCESS 12'-0" GATE TRACER TAPE PROVIDE FRAMED OPENING IN WALL NY3 3 X C 6 8 8/9 5 82 8 3 GATE FRAME - TMP. " -- .-. �—i w i1 1�-r 0,1- •�'''11110,-""111114'11110. FOR ENTRY PORT OR CORE-DRILL CENTER DROP ROD & 2 7 8 OA, GATE & CORNER POSTS > o o-(314.o o �� EXISTING WALL SITE ADDRESS: Qoo �,. . 0.. o 00 1 1/4°0 1 5 8" O.n. MUSHROOM SOCKET INTERMEDIATE POSTS 1.90"O.D. Qo 0►po Oop� 0 Qo �,•Qo 0►�o�0.Oo SURFACE TREATMENT +, { ) m�.}� . ,o��goi,►.goQ� o���o,• Qo , Qo . cy =,, ROUND BAR. SEE DWG. E-3 ELIJAH'S LANE & RT 25 SCHEDULE 40 IPE, _ = a •_ _! •_ t1. _ ��c�C )��ir►C��� C ) i TYPICAL BRAKE ` II 1=1 I=1 I I= I=1 I I i\ i\ SELECT GRANULAR x u x u x x ,� ,��/ — ,�� SOUTHOLD NY 3 STRANDS GALV, 4 POW TOP EDGE BARBED \ _ — , BARBED WIRE +:1�•' `,+++++♦++,+,.' -��+++.+.++++++j*' ♦++� 2 WELDING CABLE �, y/ I=) I I—LI I i I I ____111_=1 ,/� FILL i♦++♦ ♦��++++.++♦�i�� ♦��.♦ ♦++�++++,.++ ♦+��,��,. \ BLOCK & LOT: TOP„HINGE PER MFR. TMP. fr 1 r t�,r • � . 1► �: .. :�:�+�:� ICAL.) I=1 I=I I=1 I=1 (=1 ,�� MIN, COVER DIST. 1000 SEC 10 8 2 x2 -11 GA. cALv WOVEN ►.++++++�. +�+++�+,�+++++++,!�+,�++ — +++.;.++++++i+ ++++.+4 y 1 E911=111:_-=_111—=.111 \ WIRE FABRIC •;'�'+••+• •+•+•+•,•,•+•,•, •,•+• •+•+•+•+•;,•+•++�•.+.+.+. .+.+,►+.1 TENSION BANDS 0 14' 0/c / �,% TMP. BLOCK 4, LOT 11 .3 +I tct_r .‹ __________ POST ® 8'-0" MAX. +++++ �++++1+�+++• _\ ` ++++�.++�.������.++++�+++ +�.+.++1� AND TENSION BAR % FABRIC TO TOUCH GROUND ,�'r�+�+��;. �+++ .��+. 4 / .- i SELECT GRANULAR `� BETWEEN POSTS ►.+++, ♦.�.+♦♦+� ♦ +.i.♦++��.♦ ♦++♦ BURNDYPTYPEGAR j\ \ FILL ♦+.+� ♦+�++++♦*i�►♦ ♦+��+..+.+�+♦ ♦+.+� LAM (Tr.) /� ►+++++++�: , ����+ ��+++�.�++++.+.++�.�+ ' ++++.++1 ( ../\// /.\//\//\/ \//\/\ 1/2" CROWN ► � 48.E++++.++�, .. �\ +��++��+++++�+ +++�C�i' 1'-0" p+.+++++ +++ �.�+ BOTTOM EDGE KNUCKLED • SEE SURFACE TREATMENT DETAIL �+♦++.++�_ ♦++�ti+++♦ �+� � i /! „ ►� � _ ��.+�++�,� 3 0 SCHEDULE 40 PVC ELECTRIC 4 0 SCHEDULE 40 PVC TELEPHONE — F---I SERVICE W/ PULL-ROPE AND WIRE i-_. ',*,1, 9 ga. TENSION WIRE r.�! , ,.. Atio--1. .►rei,kstil.Aerviz fres,_, 14,: at,44 totkAesiit.��.r.4.+s'eA�:.ka: ire SERVICE W/ CABLES SIDE FRaf�JT i AT BOTTOM GROUND CONNECTION WAVED U I D E ENTRY DETAIL TITLE -- g BOTTOM HINGE PER 3/g' �A, STEEL 4 UNDERGROUND UTILITY TRENCH DETAIL 6 NEXTEL ANTENNA ELEVATION SCALE:4COMPOUND PLAN �' MFR, - TMP. OD DIAGONAL y _ CONCH FOOLING 8 DIA. - TMP. - AT GATE ONLY - S-2 S-2 {12 REQUIRED} SCALE: 1/2”=1'-0* 1 �► SCALE NONE ``' �- 4000 gilt c®oNCRERTNEER & GATE POSTS ELEVATION AND D ETA I LS T S' MANUFACTURER: ANDREW CORPORATION PETER E. PAPAY 1 -0 FENCE & GATE DETAIL 1. PROVIDE 1/4" POLYPROPYLENE PULL ROPE FOR ENTIRE 4. RESTORE ALL SURFACES TO ORIGINAL CONDITION. . of NEW r TEEPHONE RUN. MODEL: SMR-O8-09011-OD 90', 11 dBd PANEL �P�� °A,� SCALE; NONE 5. CONDUIT SHALL BE SCHEDULE 80, UV-RESISTANT 5 Q�c�O •E 1D",0,9�. SHEET NUMBER 2. COORDINATE UTILITY RUN WITH EXISTING UNDERGROUND WHERE EXPOSED TO ATMOSPHERE. HEIGHT: 44.9" 1. ALL FENCING & RELATED ASSEMBLIES UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES. UTILIZE AN INDEPENDENT WIDTH: 10.5" f .. SHALL BE GALVANIZED ZINC FINISH UTILITY LOCATING SERVICE. DEPTH: 5.0" UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION ORS '' __ »� '�"'' (BARB WIRE-ASTM A121, FABRIC-ASTM WEIGHT: 18.0 LBS. �•, ADDITION TO THIS DOCUMENT IS �- = ~�' A392-84, FRAME WORK-ASTM F669_81, 3. REMOVE & HAUL OFF-SITE ALL EXCESS SITE SOIL. A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 �'c' ^'o, 646°)o 44` ADHERING TO TABLE II, 1-C.) OF THE NEW YORK STATE ��-4.0, SS10... S _ 2 EDUCATION LAW. N.Y. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NO. 064690 & PIER SPRINT ANTENNA SCHEDULE SPRINT EQUIPMENT DD � ENS!O S g W8,/L' & PIER * 6 EQUAL SPACES = 18'-9 1/2" AT E-CELL � W8'it. MECHANICAL 'Ty ANT. QTY. ANT. QTY. MASTS QTY. CABLES QTY: CABLES CABINET WIDTH DEPTH HEIGHT WEIGHT . 7'-9" ' PPC PIER SECTOR AZIMUTH HEIGHT DOWNTILT FEED THIS INSTALL FUTURE THIS INSTALL THIS INSTALL, FUTURE (INCHES) (INCHES) (INCHES) (POUNDS) ALPHA 1 340' 110' ABOVE GRADE 0' BOTTOM DB98OH90T2E-M 2 1 3 2 1 - BETA 2 110' 110' ABOVE GRADE 0' BOTTOM DB980H90T2E-M 2 1 3 2 1 POWER PROTECTION CABINET (PPC) 48 20/11 60 250 - PPC PIER GAMMA 3 230' 110' ABOVE GRADE 0' BOTTOM DB980H90T2E-M 2 1 3 2 1 _ _ ,) Alak _ T Q; y _ GPS - - 110' ABOVE GRADE - - FURNISHED BY LUCENT POWER CABINET (`TYPICAL) 31 30 66 1600 �►�� F I ( 419 PPC CABINET HANDHOLES FOR BOLTS NOTES: ra..{7,..„ (------ L _ _ _ ^ NirARE PROHIBITED4/1:ff--:) N. 1. ANTENNAS LISTED MAY VARY, DEPENDING ON SYSTEM PERFORMANCE. BATTERY CABINET 31 30 60 2880 d Airk Ks_,E1 ` 1 I W8,A) & PIER 2. ANTENNA HEIGHTS SHOWN ARE TO TOPS OF ANTENNAS. PRIMARY RADIO CABINET 30 30 60 850 A `�� L - _ _ _ � W8 X 18 ,� 3/4" X 1/8" ® 1 3/16" 0/C ANTENNA CABLE COVER ASS'Y (ACCA) 35 29 14 40 _ - (2) W8 X3/8` W/ GALV, STEEL GRATING W/ "'• `1 121 (El ul - (2) 3/4"1 A325 STANDARD SADDLE CUP GROWTH CABINET (TYPICAL) 22 30 60 750 PAPAY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC. r r r o - FASTENERS TS3 x 2 100 HILLTOP ROAD. RAMSEY, NJ 07448 r r r r r x x x x x — I 2 W8 201-934-2828 co cc., c°� °c� c° c°� \ 3/16> ,i- --... /� c� ...�.....�,, ....�..,.,�,.� * FOOTING DESIGN BASED "' TYP, 1 '4 �' �► fes' I i ON 100 MPH WIND AND UBC �' I 1 I CLASS 4 SOIL OR BETTER _ + X3/4" W/ (4) 3/4"1 X 16" LPWR TELCO I • f` -1 I I L r - -" -` -1 (UBC TABLE 18-1-A) --116-1''Spr I I W8 X 24 +1" I i �� ;�, THREADED RODS W/ LEVELING PPC COI I I I co NUTS, GA=9 EACH WAY, 4 * EI I I ,� Ln 5000 PSI + PROJECTION PLAN WALL MOUNTED CABINET 01 NON-SHRINK ,�UGHTING FIXTURE --777 i B I I ( I GROUT ..�:r:ammurr.+ WNORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES UPPORT 2 CLEAR _ 4'-O" PART NO, N2101-W01Nir -I - I W8 X 24 +1" I I / d . •' ,:• 4 \ 3" 1'-9" 1'-9" 3" Sprint Spectrum L.P.N ; r� _� _ _ _/I GRADE _/ _ p p " 44 qd d �' z I 6" 1/4" CAP/ ' Crossroads Corporate Center ❑ W.P.wPW8 X 24 +1 g W8,g) & PIER - a 3"13" TS3 x 2 x 1/4 S WELD 1 International Blvd., Ste. 800 (� _ _ _ \, d © 4 " i ■, ° �. r t r —ri MPhoae: (201) 512-4h, New Jersey 0700 5 5 3 8" PCS EQUIPMENT SUPPORT FRAME ` ° ° " 4 Fax: (201) 512-4713 / EQUIPMENT GRADE LAYOUT ON PIERS a 1, #3 0 10 0/C " ABOVE (TYP.) PROVIDE REMOVABLE SECTION OF 4 d �` 1 21 HOLE FOR 3/81 1 4" DIAMOND PLATE AT ALL FUTURE d<` d 6 . h I i ERS ZELT W/ 1 1 j2"1 o x OVERSIZE WASHERS 9/16"1 X 1 1/4"L EQUIPMENT LOCATIONS (TYP,) +n PPC ( 1••••4.1. (TYP. FOR 7 PLACES) 422 MOUNTING HOLES 456 DETAIL (10) 6 VERT S-3 IN TOP FLANGES 5--3 SCALE: NONE CN a d g (NOT SHOWN) h a 4 . e d d TS3 x 2 x 1/4 \o /1.°°°# ag REV.!� W8 '" o "� F - - t.......,,-._ 3/16(/ P NOIEH PLAN IS ROTATED FROM THE COMPOUND PLAN. a ° i 1'-O" 1'-0" I L4 x 3 x 1/4 I 1 2"1 ' k•- " wireless dI 71111/44111111111 �- a d,' i _ i ERECTION 2. 19' X 7' OPEN GRATING CANOPY ABOVE. II •a ° d C° -- --'—I AID SEAT '--- H� 60 HERRICKS ROAD (� d u • �� _! "'t _ a MINEOLA, NY 11501 d a (516) 294-1090 • d 7 5/16" 3 3/4" 3 3/4" _ ° 1'-6"1 4000 PSI In 3/16 v a . . 0 4000 PSI cO * +�► CONCRETE FOOTING I PROJECT NUMBER 2'-3 9/16" 9 3/8" 2'-3 9/16" 9 3/8" 2'-3 9/16" 9 7/8" 1'-11 1/4" 1'-7 1/4" /i'_7 1/4" /1'_7 1/4" 4' a d �- CONCRETE ...„1 ' I 1 3/4" - - - _ L3X3X1/4 W/ d a '3 ", 1239 W8 2) 3/4'1 A325 o SECTION DRAWN B (NS & FS) - `' ` --------4-. 4- -----4- 4--- ----4- -+------ - 4-----� -4-----4- -4 41,- , a PPC MINI MOUNTING FRAME J.D.P. I I IB SECTION . CHECKED w 00 466EC 6DEC 66EC PCS GROWTH GROWTH GROWTH b P.E.P.r' SCALE' NONE a 4 419 D ETA)LPOWER BATTERY POWER COMA CABINET I CABINET CABINET N d ° 1 CABINET BACKUP CABINET E-CELL #1I #2 #3 ; NO DATE ATE ISSUEN IN S-3 SCALE: NONE y,p ---_—�+ �_— — — — - 4 — - - 8 2,_ "� 3CLEAR REV,/ 0 07/12/00 APPROVAL VAL ACOA liL_ ACOARCCA ACCA 200 F3 16/ WS(.,- �--e—�_ +-�- -� lwr _/ A PIER SECTION o cr r 1 T i liplorSCALE: NONE \ 2 1/2" 1'-9» 2 1/2" co I� 2'-2" 7'-0„ PCS MOUNTING HOLE LOCATIONS (E-CEL W; L.3 X 3 X 1/4 W/ 6'-8 3/4" SEVEN CABINET LAYOUT (2) 3/4'1 (325 DUAL EQUAL (NS & FS) MP.) _ IIS. j DETAIL SECTION 0 N a�+1"1011/ #4,4 •44;1�1r�1=i��,1=11.1 --- 422 1 11041.1.1.4.1.1..+1'11.11,11.1,11,0.1,1.1.1.1.04.1,1/ ;j'i°i'�!i'�!i'i!iii'1!i!i'i!1'�4i'i'i'i'i!1!i'i!i!1'i'i!i'i'lIWOr �. SCALE NONE SCALE NONE ,14.4+14+•.+...1.1+1.144444.1.1+1.1+1.1+..+* I APPROVALS 144•141.14'11+1•414+1.141'44+1'1'1.11.0.“1.1.41.$11.,� �+. 1.4+1,14.011 .14 .4. .. �1 �I SIDE FRONT Rte' 4,11.1'4.1,11'1,0111.01.0.1,1.11.1,1,1+1.1.44041.1.1'1,1.4,1.y o NOTE: = • , •eoeeie�omAt asiteeet • errerrr�r�Orlr�rrrrrrrrrrr♦rrrrrrrrrr�CiCi�w^ �i�6�G �i is Ii��i'�i�i�i�i�1�1�i�i�i�i�i'�i�i�iyiTi�i�r - PROJECT MANAGER: DATE: 1414'1111/'11M44'1.1.11'1.1'11/.1/1111144'1'11/ , SPRINT ANTENNA ELEVATION N 1. THE ELEVATION AND LOCATION OF THE GPS UNIT SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FINAL RF IYO=11.1°1.1.1.111.111./.1.11111.1.11.1/.1.11111/°11t SPRINT REP: DATE' REPORT. GPs UNIT 1114114111/141+/11;1/1/1/1/1+411/41//,X11/�1//4.1.41114/.1/1�1//1/41.1�; (9 REQUIRED) SCALE: 1 j2"=1'—D" (SUPPLED BY LUCENT) 1.01.1,1+11'1'1.141,1.04.1414.1.1+0.014.0.11.01.0.1,1` - VERIZON REP r 2. THE GPS UNIT MOUNT IS DESIGNED TO FASTEN TOA STANDARD 1-1/4" DIAMETER, SCHEDULE 40, '44.4./.4...44+.41+1.4.4.1.4.4.4.144-44.4.4.4.44414.0.< " w DATE: 11...1.1.1�1,0.1.0,1.1.0.1,1,1111,1.0.111,4,04,1�1.H.0,10,1t `�' MANUFACTURER: DECIBEL PRODUCTS GALVANIZED STEEL OR STAINLESS STEEL PIPE. THE PIPE MUST NOT BE THREADED AT THE UN !' ilii;�►;i,i;i>i,i,i,i,iti;a:i,r,a.,i r.r.r,.,r,u.r..,ri. ,i,i,�.,�;i; �, MOUNT END. THE PIPE SHALL BE CUT TO THE REQUIRED LENGTH (MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES) USING A I HAND OR ROTARY PIPE CUTTER TO ASSURE A SMOOTH AND PERPENDICULAR CUT. A HACK SAW SAFETY1A GAGE, A INGGW/ 3* SID 24 WIDE a, „ MODEL: DB9$OH90T2E-M, 15 dBd PCS PANEL SHALL NOT BE USED, THE CUT PIPE END SHALL BE DEBURRED AND SMOOTH IN ORDER TO SEAL _iii_ GRIPS GRATING EL 3" SIDE RAILS. jp• GUSSET HEIGHT: 60.0" S MATTITUCK GRIP STRUT MODEL 103012. PROVIDE AGAINST THE NEOPRENE GASKET ATTACHED TO THE UNIT MOUNT. Z MONOPOLE 7 LONG, UNSPUCED LENGTHS OVER NZ WIDTH: 6.0 3. THE MOUNTING PLATE SHALL BE FABRICATED AS SHOWN AND ATTACHED TO THE APPROPRIATE DOUBLE CHANNEL ENTIRE PAD. (1) SECTION 12' WIDE ® $" X 5" X 1/2" DEPTH: 2.75" „ T••+••.envoy• ••.••• o •.Iyer yes*ti , v, BASE PLATE WEIGHT: 8.5 LBS. SITE NUMBER: SUPPORT STRUCTURE USING U-BOLTS. THE SUPPORT PIPE SHALL THEN BE ATTACHED TO THE0"x''1`1`1`•`'`•''``1`1'1`11'11'1'1"1'='='_'=`i11'1"1'1'1`1'1'1'1'"° z NY33XC688 958283 MOUNTING BRACKET USING THE OVERSIZE U-BOLTS PROVIDED TO ALLOW ADJUSTMENT. IT IS WI (4) 5/8 BOLTS i1/1'11'1'111'1'/'1'/'1'i'1'1'11'1'1'1/1111,1/111/1�11 0 / 4.0.4.4.4.4./.1+4+1+1+1,44.4+4.14.4.1.4+4.4.1+4+4,403 1/2”0.D. SCHED. / CRITICAL THAT THE GPS UNIT IS MOUNTED SUCH THAI IT IS WITHIN 2 DEGREES OF VERTICAL I CADWELD CONNECTION '1'/1�/.1'11/.1'1'/.1/./1'1.1'//./.1'1'1'1.1.1.1'1.11.1.1.1.64'x' W 40 PIPEII/ �'" ,` I,n1/./1/1/;144.411111111,111;1111111;11/1/;1;111;/;1;0.44 I ^ AND THE BASE OF THE UNIT IS WITHIN 2 DEGREES OF LEVEL, , , Snt ADDRESS: ,_ ' (TYPICAL AT PIPES AND _11,0+4.111'1.11.1.111=11.1111111.111111=1 CLAD 5/8'1 BOLT EXTERIOR LIGHTING FIXTURE BILL OF MATERIALS I 1/4" GALV. PLATE) .„.r,;+;!;1,/,/;!;1;11/;/;141;1;1;/,/;1;/;1/1;//1;x;111;/,1__ ��I ( ) C..• ELIJAH S LANE �C RT 25 _ >r TYP. FOR 4 W/ 60 MINUTE TIMER �` '� SOUTHOLD NY I In , I: TILT HOLES FOR ADJUSTMENT PLAN TYPE FOR 4) 1 1/2' X 1/2" BELL REDUCER QUANTITY L� ( BLOCK & LOT: ITEMS DESCRIPTION (each) o \ o (" ' f' ' 5/16"1 GALVANIZED CARRIAGE BOLT 13, 1/2'0 STD• WT. PIPE DIST. 1000, SEC. 108 O 1-1/4"0 sch. 40 x 18" LG. MIN SS OR GALV. PIPE 1 • 0 ' '� t9,_0" AND #12262 DIAMOND ANCHOR MP.) AT TOP BLOCK THREADED BLOCK 4, LOT 11 .3 CHANNEL - C6 x 8,2 x 60" LG. GALV.(A-36) 1 0 i '� 3'-6" A'6" X 3" X 1/4" W/ • SAFETY GRATING (2) "11/16'1 HOLES FOR O ZD CHANNEL - C6 x 8.2 x 48" LG. GALV.(A-36) 1 © 6 X 6 X 5/16 r �,-- 581 BOLTS I E• 1 ISI II 5/8"0 BOLT W/ DOUBLE HEX NUTS AND 4 '� #2 AWG BCW i I . 1 11/2'S U—BOLT TS3 X 2 X 1/4 AT WASHERS, GALV. .14"1111!!! STD. U-BOLT FOR 2"� PIPE W/ DOUBLE HEX NUTS 2 / Urn GROUNDING KIT 'C' PPC SUPPORT POST ® AND WASHER, GALV. (SEE NOTE 3) GPS CIGBE P-.. 1/2"0 COAX CABLE `D 4 REL3 X3UIXRm 4" BRACE EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHEET TITLE GROUND BAR \ . �, • MINIMUM BENDING RADIUS PER ( Q ) MA MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD '.0 1-10000/r SCALE 3/4"=1'=0" 60" (TRIM TO LENGTH) #2 AWG BCW #6 AWG GROUNDING KIT 1 3 1/2" O,D, SCHED. 1/2" FIT MONOPOLE 2 1/8" -I I- 7 8" CABLE (PROVIDED WITH KIT) 40 POST (TYP.) . DETAILS 1 I I I / NOTE: OVERSIZE U-BOLT PROVIDED S- TO MIGB PETER PAY _ _ #2 SOUR TINNED, .0-a� New yo -�_—_-_________—_—_•..__-_-__.e._ TO ALLOW t 2' TILT/ADJUSTMENT TO kP c' -- I N ACHENE TOLERANCE "'" COPPER TO LOWER �� A�R E. pqA 'f e- ; +1 MIGB Q ; 9c - " : , r r 1 1/2" -\.....11/1613 HOLE FOR 5/8"1 BOLT WITH C6 7/16*"X 7/8" SLOTTED HOLE GPS UNIT MOUNTING B RACKET ._ a � �,,.,,_.� DOUBLE NUTS AND WASHERS (TYP.) 11/41 PIPE � - UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR r..� l.r.► ELEVATION ADDITION TO THIS DOCUMENT IS Z-z id1�iAirixr MOUNTING BRACKET 806 DETAIL c--------:->--------' A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 �FysF° " S 4% 06Q6 ��*�� S--3 SCALE: NONE CANOPY DETAILS OF THE NEW YORK STATE PROFESS�oN. _ 3 /,� SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0" EDUCATION LAW. REV. ' N.Y. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NO. 064690 A VERIZON ANTENNA SCHEDULE STEEL NOTES MECHANICAL fZ' 10'-10''& BEAM . A & BEAM , SECTOR I AZIMUTH HEIGHT DOWNTILT FEED ANTENNA 1. INCORRECTLY FABRICATED, DAMAGED OR OTHERWISE MISFITTING OR NON-CONFORMING - ALPHA 1 107 80 ABOVE GRADE 0' BOTTOM ALP9011 MATERIALS OR CONDITIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO REMEDIAL W - ), BETA 2 222' 80' ABOVE GRADE 0' BOTTOM ALP9011 OR CORRECTIVE ACTION. �, I I GAMMA 3 342' 80' ABOVE GRADE 8' BOTTOM ALP9011 -1 `� GPS - - AT SHELTER ROOF - - FURNISIED BY LUCENT 2. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF STRUCTURAL AND MISCELLANEOUS STEEL SHALL CONFORM �' �I I TO THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION "SPECIFICATION FOR THE DESIGN, g 0 A -, AM FABRICATION AND ERECTION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL FOR BUILDINGS", LATEST EDITION. 1. ANTENNAS LISTED MAY VARY, DEPENDING ON SYSTEM PERFORMANCE. _ BROOM FINISH 2. ANTENNA HEIGHTS SHOWN ARE TO TOPS OF ANTENNAS. 3. STRUCTURAL AND MISCELLANEOUS STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A36, ..:= = Z GRADE BEAM 10'-10" GRADE BEAM "STRUCTURAL STEEL", LATEST EDITION, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. = 1 POUR DOOR PAD AFTER 3'-9" - STEEL SHELTER 4. ALL PIPES SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A501 OR A53 GRADE B (Fy=35 ksi MIN.). A500 CONCRETE. I; f INSTALLATION AND FASTENING 1 SHELTER RAIL GRADE B MAY BE USED IF A501 OR A53 SEE IS NOT AVAILABLE. PAD / I 1 4" FT. SLOPE IPAPAY � OF SHELTER � / ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC. -' MIRAFl 500X_ (2) #4 CONT. 5. ALL TUBES SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A500 GRADE B (Fy=46 ksi). 100 HILLTOP ROM. RAMSEY, NJ 07446 CD ^- .11 . . , ><-=Z-x 7. FILTER FABRIC. TOP 84 BOTTOM ® ' 201-934-2828 ° o . . 4 -1. OR APPROVED EQUAL ) 3/1 fi 6. ALL THREADED RODS SHALL BE A36, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. OUTLINE OF `i .- w x. k (TYPICAL) ,e,..„.../-SHELTER ABOVE r �Q �� . .a .: : •; , 1 f ' _ _ /�//,//N, . x i , x., x. - . . •!: ?`-1,, r)\ -'U� AUC% �-�UU -'UU( )uc)_ �-'UCJ( UU OL" U 7. SHOP CONNECTIONS SHALL BE WELDED OR BOLTED. FIELD CONNECTIONS SHALL BE BOLTED i \ . . -off\ Z` '�� ` C�' �.0.Q•�"\ �\ /\` c' � . : ..Zr jj / r _ ` )c L.i 1,CY� `c .• .°, .. ,// // j/ /j /\/, „/j /j\//\//\jj\//\/\/\/\/\/\\ ' , �j\,/ \, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. ALL BOLTED CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITH HIGH 12" X 12" X 3/4" 2 . /� / / f d : /.� !� /� /�j/, /.� /.� /.� /.ti /� /.� /� !�/,<�//.�j/.�j/,�j/.�/ j/.�j/.`j/.�� \j\j�`j /\��j\ �� / j� \\� • o ' j\ STRENGTH BOLTS. BEARING PLATE /i� ��/�./�./��/i✓i./f�/i\� ` / . • • (TYPICAL FOR 6) _4 \ � ; `/� \% j\ 8. STRUCTURAL CONNECTION BOLTS SHALL BE HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS AND SHALL CONFORM FILTER FABRIC. MIRAFI 500X_ \\; . `. ' j/ 3 TYP. \\! , . \� b, TO ASTM A325 "HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS FOR STRUCTURAL JOINTS, INCLUDING SUITABLE ...v...� ` OR APPROVED EQUAL i��. .a `i/% 4" BED OF CRUSHED STONE \ \// ``' NUTS AND PLAIN HARDENED WASHERS", LATEST EDITION. BOLTS SHALL BE 5/8" DIAMETER, - onY WWF 6x6-W2.9xW2.9- / , ' • . jj -UNDERLAIN BY COMPACTED IN / • .,jj UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NUTS SHALL BE HEAVY HEX. A LOCKING DEVICE SHALL BE -1� \' 4 `•• \ \ SITU SOIL \\\' \ INSTALLED ON ALL STEEL TO STEEL CONNECTIONS. �- � �-- \ \\� • �� Sprint Spectrum L.P. \��\\A A. ::\,< \/�\A\ \\vyv�' 9. WELDSAA DRFORSHALL ME HODS USED IN CORRECTIVE WELDING. ALLPROCEDURES, WELD RAPPEARANCE, AND WELDING OF Crossroads Corporate Center 1'-6" #4 STIRRUPS AT 1'-6" PROCESSES SHALL BE QUALIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWS "STANDARD QUALIFICATION 1 International Blvd., Ste. 800 12" 0/C (TYPICAL) PROCEDURES". ALL WELDS SHALL BE WITH (70 ELECTRODES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. Mahwah, New Jersey 07495 Phone: (201) 512-4700 A FOUNDATION SECTION 10. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL STEEL, BOLTS AND U-BOLTS SHALL BE HOT-DIP Fax: (201) 512-4713 GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION CONFORMING ASTM A153. �' S-4 SCALE 1/2"-1'-O" 11. TRIMMED ENDS OF STEEL AND DISTURBED SURFACES SHALL RECEIVE A COAT OF Z.R.C. COLD GALVANIZING COMPOUND AS MANUFACTURED BY Z.R.C. CHEMICAL PRODUCTS CO., 3VERIZON ANTENNA ELEVATION QUINCY, NNASS. 3/4"� HOOKED \\. --------- 12. ALL SPECIALTY ANCHORS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS. J-BOLTS S-4 (12 REQUIRED) SCALE: 3/4"=1°-0" Mr C) • a 13. ALL MASTS SHALL BE CONTINUOUS (WITHOUT SPLICE) AND SHALL BE INSTALLED PLUMB c . .� WlrereSS IMANUFACTURER: SWEDCOM CORPORATION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. . 0 --- 60 HERRICKS ROAD MODEL: ALP-E 9011-DIN ENHANCED LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNA CONCRETE �OTES MINEOLA, NY 11501 it 1 T. ,,,,,,,, /�� HEIGHT: 43" 3" 6" 3 f (51 6) 294-1090 Th 1__.___ _ 1'-0" WIDTH: 6.5" l 1. CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN DEPTH: 8" 3/4" BEARING WEIGHT (INCLUDING BRACKETS): 20 LBS. CONCRETE 318-95)INSTITUTE COMMENTARYILDINGDE REQUIREMENTS FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE PROJECT NUMBER '2'-4" 1239 2. CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE SHALL BE NORMAL WEIGHT CONCRETE AND SHALL HAVE MINIMUM DRAWN BY 1/4 TYP. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 4000 PSI AT 28 DAYS. SLUMP SHALL BE 4 INCHES (±1 INCH). 1 FOUNDATION PLAN .c, J.D.P. AIR ENTRAINMENT SHALL BE 8%. S-4 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" 3. CONCRETE REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE GRADE 60 DEFORMED BARS AND SHALL CONFORM CHECKED DY TO ASTM SPECIFICATION A 615 WITH A MINIMUM YIELD STRENGTH Fy=60 ksi. WELDED WIRE P.E.P. FABRIC REINFORCEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A82 AND SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM NOTES: --13" I-- Fy=70 ksi. 1. SEE DWG. S-2 FOR SHELTER LOCATION AND O DATEISSUE ORIENTATION. 0 07/12/00 4. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER FOR REINFORCING BARS SHALL BEAPPROVAL 2 BEARING PLATE DETAIL AS FOLLOWS: S-4 SCALE 1"=1'-O" A) 3" FOR FOUNDATION BOTTOM BARS AND VERTICAL BARS. NOTES: 5. MINIMUM LAP SPLICES SHALL BE 40 BAR DIAMETERS. 1. PROVIDE (6) BEARING PLATES. 6. CONCRETE INSPECTIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED PER SPRINT AND VERIZON STANDARDS. STANDARD PANELS WITH AGGREGATE FINISH ALL AROUND FOUNDATION NOTES CABLE PORT 1. FOUNDATIONS SHALL BEAR ON UNDISTURBED NATURAL SOIL OR COMPACTED STRUCTURAL 4" MUFFLER EPDM MCA HAVING A MINIMUM ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY OF 1500 POUNDS PER SQUARE 3 7 1 2 - A.C. UNITFOOT. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY ALL NECESSARY MEASURES TO SAFEGUARD THE STRUCTURAL 4100.1 • INTEGRITY OF ADJACENT STRUCTURES DURING EXCAVATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF APPROVALS A.C. UNIT too. A.C. UNIT 2.-0"..1_ 3 -2' FOUNDATIONS. SIDEWALL STABILITY OF EXCAVATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED DURING X00" j EXCAVATION. ANY UNUSUAL FIELD CONDITIONS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO INTEGRAL EXHAUST LOUVER z DISCONNECT SWITCH 3'-3" X 3'-3" -"-`-` THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER. PROJECT MANAGER: DATE: Lo `p FUEL FILL & VENT-- .", 3. BOTTOM OF EXCAVATION SHALL BE CLEANED OF LOOSE MATERIAL AND WATER PRIOR TO SPRINT REP: DATE: PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE.. DEWATERING SHALL BE PERFORMED WITHOUT LOOSENING N-' OF THE SUBGRADE. VERIZON REP: DATE: z 8" X 12" 0 - `; ; 4. FOOTINGS AND SLABS SHALL BE PLACED ON FIRM, DRY AND NON-FROZEN SUB-GRADE. s c _ 10 <1 N `° �FF i 1.. \\._ �' S. SEE REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE MANUFACTURER'S DRAWINGS FOR REPLACEMENT MONOPOLE srrE E, /�'! FOUNDATION DRAWINGS AND DETAILS. IVIATTITUCK r , GFl RECEPTACLE SHELTER ANCHORING NOTES SITE NUMBER: NY33XC688/958283 1. THE EQUIPMENT SHELTER AND FOUNDATION INDICATED ARE BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED SIFE ADDRESS: B LEFT ELEVATION c REAR ELEVATION � BY KULLMAN INDUSTRIES, INC., AVENEL, N.J. 908) 636-1500. ELIJAH'S LANE & RT 25 S-4 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-O" S-4 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" 2. INSTALL SHELTER IN FULL ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S CURRENT PUBLISHED INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. SOUTH O LD, NY EPDM FASCIA LIGHTING FIXTURE 3. REFER TO DRAWING S-2 FOR SHELTER LOCATION. BLOCK & LOT: 4. INSTALL BEARING PLATES FURNISHED WITH SHELTER. WELD SHELTER TO BEARING PLATES. DIST. 1 000, SEC. 108 ELECTRODES SHALL BE E70XX OR E60XX. BLOCK 4 4'-O" 2'-O" 1 A.C. UNIT SECURITY VIEW HOLE (TYP.) 1 LOT 11 .3 _ I_ I EXHAUST LOUVER • Z-47-3" X 4'-3" SHEET 1'11TLE 0 7- 0 0 II .4U U 0 I - DETAILS ....' PETER E. PAPAY 1 -L . of NEW ,.. 04, Q E UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR -"grill D RIGHT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION ADDITION TO THIS DOCUMENT IS o ��. S-4 SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" S-4 SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 `'cF ^'�• O6Q69 re 4- OF THE NEW YORK STATE �' O PROFEss�oN°`�� S - 4 EDUCATION LAW. N.Y. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NO. 064690 DISTRICT 10D0 SECTION 108 BLOC( 3 LOT NO. BMA= 5,2 CRAIG & LORRAINE JOHNSON 20505 MAIN RD., MATTITUCK. NY 11952 5.3 EDWARD SANDBERG 20105 MAIN RD., MATTITUCK, NY 11952 5,6 THOMAS C. & CATHERINE M. WILTON 260 ELIJAHS LA., MATTITUCK, NY 111952 5.7 BARBARA HOFER & CHARLES GAETJENS P.O. BOX 481, MATTITUCK, NY 11952 A5 1.0 . 5. 5,8 R RRE CE BOX E. MATTHEWS Ettiwek"."7667:14;:= ATTITUCK NY 11952 5.9 WILLIAM BURNS P.O. BOX 987, MATTITUCK, NY 11952 5.10 FRANK TODRICK P.O. BOX 406, MATTITUCK, NY 11952 ,�0 5.44 JOSEPH & CATHLEEN SHIPMAN PAPAY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION. INC. A.0 985 ELIJAHS LN., MATTITUCK, NY 11952: 100 HILLTOP ROAD, RAMSEY, NJ 07448 201-934-2828 5.45 JOSEPH & CATHLEEN SHIPMAN 985 ELIJAHS IN., MATTUUCK, NY 11952' DISTRICT 1000 SECTION 108 BLOCK 4 %/ 2.1 VICTOR GRABOWSKI 18875 MAIN RD., MATTITUCK, NY 11952 2.3 STATE OF NEW YORK `3 0a 0 %// AGENCY BLDG. ONE EMPIRE STATE PLAZA .rin OCA( 1,pp / ALBANY, NY 12238 0;4%06 j 3 CHARLES & MILDRED GARDNER svV8- 18955 MAIN RD., MATTITUCK, NY 11952 ,/ 4 9� 6 LOUISE CARDEWNA oC 19155 MAIN RD., MATTITUCK, NY 11952 Sprint Spectrum L.P. 59 7.3 SCNIA C. HUNTER I 55 SUNDANCE DR., COS COD, CT 06807-1809 1C International s oBlor�ates Center AA l 7.4 CARL SKREZEC, JR. & LARA BAYNE Mahwah, New Jersey 07495 845 ELIJAHS IN., MATTITUCK, NY 11952' ;pg 0 0� 6• Phone: (201) 512-4700 001 �p0 V �tEUB 7.5 JOSEPH P. SHIPMAN & WE Fax: (201) 512-4713 Alpo etc A ya (approx.) 985 ELIJAHS IN., MATTITUCK, NY 11952 5$`10'‘‘' ,L 2 y0S 7.23 STEVEN & TRA,Y LEPRE �1�j ti0T A 520 GABRIELLA CT., MAITITUCK, NY 11952 v,oiNO % 7,24 THOMAS RILEY �� pyo j 670 GABRIELLA CT., MATTITUCK, NY 11952 / 7.40 DALLAS & DIAD DODGE, SR. C� 9\G� j 665 GABRIELLA CT., P.O. BOX 636, MATTITUCK, NY 11952 �� 7.41 DEREK McLEAN \\°°°°°°°°:........°°°°°°..- 4 G�P P.O. BOX 500, MATTITUCK, NY 11952 O'.Dwir"ereCss 29 < 0' 5� j 7.43 RAYMOND & SALLY NEICHLEY 0� 1. ���P ov°� �/c../ vdi 27 CASE AVENUE, PATCHOGUE, NY 11772 60 HERRICKS ROAD SAO 'a" 7,44 JANET ODDON MINEOLA, NY 11501 ,� 'lin %// 315 RACHELS RD., MATTITUCK, NY 11952 (51 6) 294-1090 p b � q, �\� 7.45 SHAWN & CHRISTINA LOPER 10 4 CAROL PL., BROOKHAVEN, NY 11719 f7,46 GERARD W. & CATHERINE L. POOLE PROJECT NUMBER 0 116 SWEEZY AVE., RNERHEAD, NY 11901 1239 A 56 < > / 8 JOAN PATRICIA HILLIARD & UBALDO GONZALEZ A% 0� 1.3 9 OC % P.O. BOX 248, NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 DRAWN BY voi.-\q. 11.2 WILLIAM J. BAXTER JR. et. al. D P if k $ 1030 EAST PUTNAM AVE„ GREENWICH, CT 06830 4 CHIC D BY 0 1111 j 11.3 WILLIAM J. BAXTER JR. et. al. & ORS. ypC 14��� y0 y�G �Op 3p�' % 1030 EAST PUTNAM AVE., GREENWICH, CT 06830 �,��o.,� P.E.P. 4 ��,��j�' 12 OC>ROTHY CONNELLY & KAREN MASTON C/0 ROSALIE MASTON NO DATEISSUE LOR S5 Illipp-Sr LOT 5 2 � 535 ELIJAHS IN., MATTITUCK, NY 11952 <> 5.s C5TRK T 1000 SEC110N 115 BLOCK 0 07/12/00 APPROVAL AR LOT 7 46 1,04 '1,45 401 LOT 7 ANNA MCKAY 27 PIRATE ST.. RIVERHEAD, NY 11901 • DISTRICT 1000 SECTION 115 BLOCK 7 oT 4 1 P.0 R 9, Y 1230, MATTITUCK NY 11952 \--ID L �� Y 3 RAYMOND & CHRISTINE ZANESKI oT 2 3 6 ti� j 260 EASTWARD CT., MATTITUCK, NY 11952 L 6.:5 LOT 0 10 MARCUS BURDEN LOT 10 CD 265 EASTWARD CT., MATTITUCK, NY 11952 LOT 5 2 C\ • ROAD 11 CAROLYN MYRON P.O. BOX 819, MATTITUCK, NY 11952 OT 3 II L 12 19450 NCE &MAIN RD., MIATTITUCKCE K,, NY 11952 111‘1::: (S.R. 25) ZONE AC 14 JACQUELINE MITCHELL K. P.O. BOX 840, MATTITUCK, NY 11952 MAIN LOT fz LOT +3,2 LOT ++ / VINEYARD j ODERTY C WT- I \ 5PROJECT fuIANAGER:APPROVALS DATE: LOT ! A SPRINT REP: DATE: LOT 14 v115 VERIZON REP: DATE: (�`�} BLOCK 7 LOT 7 ' t SECTI 1000 iJ I ZONE R-40 DI5TR1C• ZONE R-40 SITE NAME; Ili MATTITUCK SITE NUMBER: LoT 10 NY33XC688A/958283 1111111111111"- -rig SITE ADDRESS: LOT 3 - ELIJAH S LANE & RT 25 SEBL BLOCK 615 SOUTHOLD, NY DISTRICT 1000 BLOCK & LOT: DIST. 1000, SEC. 108 BLOCK 4, LOT 11 .3 NOTES: 1. LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF STRUCTURES ON LOTS OUTSIDE OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION ARE APPROXIMATE. ALKEY MAP NV SCALE: ,=1d0' SHEET TITLE GRAPHIC SCALE 100 0 50 100 200 .400 KEY MAP wi, si ammo PETER E. PAPAY ( QJ FEET P. -OF NEW kOR� 1 inch = 1.00ft� g� Q���R E. A,qA�/- '4"i'_ _... 1 7 4 - ,* r few ; l- * UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR V s rF ibatc=w., , ADDITION TO THIS DOCUMENT ISvia rux • IIIIIG' ir A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 G%� tia 06N690 �0 OF THE NEW YORK STATE y,Peo ,EssS _____ 1 A 1oNP`�� EDUCATION LAW. N.Y. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NO. 064690