Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4547APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman James Dinizio, Jr. Lydia A. Tortora Lora S. Collins George Horning o � CA x BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ZBA Fax (516) 765-9064 Telephone (516) 765-1809 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 23, 1998 Appl. No. 4547 - RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY CO. PARCEL 1000-46-1-1 and 2.1 STREET & LOCALITY: Buildings #74610 and 74500, Main Road (State Route 25), Greenport, NY DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: March 23, 1998, May 14, 1998 and June 11, 1998 PROPERTY FACTS/ DESCRIPTION: The above -identified property is located on the south side of Main Road, Greenport, and contains a total combined lot area of 5.938 acres. The "re -zoning plan" site layout map RZ-1 dated July 18, 1996 prepared by Donald A. Denis, Architect, has been submitted to show the land area and footprints of the two existing buildings. Also submitted are drawings dated June 11, 1997 for a proposed principal building, with retail area at the northerly front portion, and remaining areas consisting of vestibule, design center, receiving and office areas, inside storage areas, accessory lunchroom and mechanical room. Buffer areas are shown around the perimeter of the property, and an outside uncovered storage area of 15,000 sq. ft. located in the easterly side yard. Also shown on the plan is an outside storage area which is proposed to conform to the current accessory use regulations for this LIO Zone District. No building or canopy area is proposed over this storage area and there was no basis addressed in the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval with respect to this part of the plan. BASIS OF APPEAL: Building Inspector's January 2, 1998 Notice of Disapproval which reads as follows: "...1) the proposed structure being located in an LIO District is permitted to have a maximum of 60 feet of frontage on one street. The proposed building is approximately 115 ft. facing Rt. 25. Pursuant to Article XIII, Section 100-133C; 2) When fences are located in or along side and rear yards, they shall not exceed 6-1/2 feet in height, pursuant to 100-231B...." AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED BY APPLICANT: The applicant is requesting variances regarding: 1) an increased width of principal building from code limitation of 60 feet to 115 feet wide facing Route 25 (a/k/a Main Road) in this Light -Industrial -Office (LIO) District; and (2) Fencing up to 8 -ft. in height along side and rear property lines. Page 2 - June 23, 1998 ZBA Meeting Appl. #4547 - Riverhead Building Supply Parcel: 1000-46-1-1 and 2.1 (combined) REASONS AND BOARD ACTION: Based on all testimony, documentation, personal observation of the board members, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: 1. Applicant proposes to construct a metal drive-thru warehouse with a showroom/building supply store at the front. The total square footage is approximately 50,424 sf. The 115 -foot width is proposed to allow vehicles to enter to east side of the building to pick up drywall, roofing, lumber and similar supplies, and then pay at the exit on the west side. The smaller store in the front would contain a showroom and smaller supplies. 2. The applicant has submitted an extensive landscaping plan for the entire property and has agreed to help mitigate the visual impact of the width of the building by moving it back to a distance of 110 feet from the Main Road in order to provide an additional 10 -foot landscape buffer. 3. The property contains a total of 5.9 acres and has 325 feet of frontage on Main Road. The adjacent properties are commercially zoned and developed property, with the exception of a residential condominium complex to the east. FOR THESE REASONS, the Board determines as follows: In considering this application, the Board finds that a variance for an 8 -foot high fence, and a variance for a building width of 115 feet are the minimum necessary and adequate and at the same time will preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood, and the health, safety and welfare of the community. 1. Grant of an area variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or detriment to nearby properties. The proposed lumber yard supply building is a permitted use in the LIO District. the use is compatible with adjacent commercial uses, and the large size of the property and extensive landscape plan will provide a sufficient buffer from the residential/ condominium complex. The 8 -foot high fence will provide security and protection of the public as well. (2) The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for applicant to pursue, other than an area variance because the 60 -foot code limitation would not permit room for storage of material and for vehicles to have sufficient clearance to maneuver safety in the drive-thru operation proposed. (3) The requested area variance is substantial and represents a 95+ - percent reduction in the code required 60 ft. minimum width. However the specific location, large size of the property and extensive landscaping proposed help mitigate the degree of the variance. (4) The difficulty situation has been self-created and relates to the applicant's desire to establish a drive-thru type of lumber business that requires a large -width structure in order to operate. Page 3 - June 23„ 1998 ZBA Meeting Appl. #4547 - Riverhead Building Supply Parcel: 1000-46-1-1 and 2.1 (combined) (5) The proposed variance will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because the property is a large commercially zoned parcel, and the proposed use is in keeping with many others in the vicinity. The applicant has submitted extensive landscaping plan for the entire property and has agreed to help mitigate the visual impact of the width of the building by moving it back to a distance of 110 feet from the Main Road in order to provide an additional 10 -ft. landscape buffer. RESOLUTION/ACTION: On motion by Member Dinizio, seconded by Member Horning, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the variances requested subject to the following CONDITIONS: 1. In order to help mitigate the visual impact of the width of the building, it shall be moved back from the Main Road a minimum distance of 110 feet in order to provide an additional 10 -foot landscape buffer. 2. The 8 ft. high fencing along the most easterly property line shall be slatted. 3. Accessory open storage of materials and off-street parking areas shall comply with the provisions of Section 100-131 and 100-101 inclusive. VOTE OF THE BOARD: AYES: MEMBERS DINIZIO, TORTORA, HORNING, AND COLLINS. NAY: CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER (felt that the building width at 115 feet is more than he is willing t9_appr3)ve). This Resolution was duly 46-1-1 4-1 RD P. GOEHRINGER, C )ved for Filing 6/27/98 i:ECEIVED AND FILED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK DATE (e /a 9/"' HOUR 3,'3 0 am Town Clerk, Town of Southold BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL_NOTICE Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ZBA Fax (516) 765-9064 Telephone (516) 765-1809 SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY, JUNE 11, 1998 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the Code of the Town of Southold, the following application will be held for public hearing by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS, at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971, on THURSDAY, JUNE 11, 1998 at the time noted below (or as soon thereafter as possible): 5:45 p.m. Appl. No. 4547 - RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY CO. (Re-op� as per Board Resolution adopted May 19, 1998). This is a variance request based upon the Building Inspector's January 2, 1998 Notice of Disapproval which reads as follows: "...1) the proposed structure being located in an LIO District is permitted to have a maximum of 60 feet of frontage on one street. The proposed building is approximately 115 ft. facing Rt. 25. Pursuant to Article XIII, Section 100-133C; 2) When fences are located in or along side and rear yards, they shall not exceed 6-1/2 feet in height, pursuant to 100-231B....11 Location of Property: 74610 and 74500 Main Road, Greenport, NY; 1000-46-1-1 and 2.1, combined as a single lot. The Board of Appeals will at said time and place hear any and all persons or representatives desiring to be heard in the above applications or desiring to submit written statements before the end of each hearing. The hearing will not start earlier than designated. The file is APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS �0��$UFFO(�-COGS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman c James Dinizio, Jr. a Lydia A. Tortora Lora S. Collins uk George Horning BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL_NOTICE Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ZBA Fax (516) 765-9064 Telephone (516) 765-1809 SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY, JUNE 11, 1998 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the Code of the Town of Southold, the following application will be held for public hearing by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS, at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971, on THURSDAY, JUNE 11, 1998 at the time noted below (or as soon thereafter as possible): 5:45 p.m. Appl. No. 4547 - RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY CO. (Re-op� as per Board Resolution adopted May 19, 1998). This is a variance request based upon the Building Inspector's January 2, 1998 Notice of Disapproval which reads as follows: "...1) the proposed structure being located in an LIO District is permitted to have a maximum of 60 feet of frontage on one street. The proposed building is approximately 115 ft. facing Rt. 25. Pursuant to Article XIII, Section 100-133C; 2) When fences are located in or along side and rear yards, they shall not exceed 6-1/2 feet in height, pursuant to 100-231B....11 Location of Property: 74610 and 74500 Main Road, Greenport, NY; 1000-46-1-1 and 2.1, combined as a single lot. The Board of Appeals will at said time and place hear any and all persons or representatives desiring to be heard in the above applications or desiring to submit written statements before the end of each hearing. The hearing will not start earlier than designated. The file is Page 2 - Legal Notice`✓ -� Hearings for June 11, ,1998 Southold Town Board of Appeals available for review during regular . Town Hall business _ hours (8-4 p.m.). if you have questions, please do not hesitate to call 765 -1809 - Dated: May 20, 1998. BY ORDER- OF THE. SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS GERARD P. GOEHR.INGER, Chairman \ TOWN OF SODTHOLD s"v, V° f2�0 syr BUILDING DEPARTMENT ; SOUZiiOLD, N.Y_ .NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL 1 DkT -Fannarp 2 1998 To Patricia -Moore Asa, • AJC., Riverhead, Bldg,, Supply CO - 315 Westphalia Rd._ P.O. Box 483 Mattituck NY. 11952 PLEASE. TAKE NOTICE that your application dated ... Oct..22---------- . 1997_..•. for,permit to ........................... at 74610 Location of Property74500___•,•••__,-_ Main Rd. Greenport '-__.___..._- _..... House No. Street Hamlet County'Tax Map No. 1000 - Section .46 ...... ._ BLOCK ... 01...... LOT :O1_fi 2.1 Subdivision ........_...................... Filed Map No. .........Lot No........ is returped berevith and disapproved on the following grounds 1;)32e.prnpD_ged stj:=tux_e...... being located in an LIO District is permitted to have a maximum of 60 feet of frontage on one street. The ,proposgd,building, is, approximately, 115'_ facing Rt<_ 25. Pursuant. _ to Article %III 300-133 (C). 2) When fences are located in or along side and rear ................................................. ....................... .................... Xhrds they shall not_egteed,6',feet_:in_height.__.Pursuant to Article_ 100-231 B. Action required by the Zoning Board of Appeals. NOTE: The proposed building will occupy two separate lots. ....................................... -....... --------------- BU G NSPEGTOR RV 1/80 FORM NO. 1 TOWN OF SOUT BUILDING DEPAR TOWN HAL SOUTHOLD, N.Y. TEL.: 765-18 Examined .................19... �U Approved ................. 19 ... Permit No........... . Disapproved a/c ..................................... "RO,iFD OF HEALTH ......... `,3 SETS OF PLANS .......... SURVEY ......__. ... .. IT C1IECr .................... p} _. SEPT.IC FOtttl . ..... . ] (� P n n- rt 1— — hoTIipy b.Denis 722-3511 ..CALL .....____. .... ... OCT G 3 1�, :VA I L TO F Box 565 uebogue,,NY `1Y93i ............................ (Building Inspector). ` APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Date ..................1 19... INSTRUCTIONS a. This application must be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector, with 3 sets of pians, accurate plot plan to.scale. Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and giving a detailed description of layout of property must be drawn on the diagram which is part of this appli- cation. c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issued a Building Permit to the applicant. Such permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose whatever until a Certificate of Occupancy shall have been granted by the Building Inspector. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Budding Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable haws, Ordinances or Regulations, for the construction of buildings, additions or alterations, or for removal or demolition, as herein described. the applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws; ordinances, building code, housing code, and regulations, and to sdmit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. (Signature of applicant, or name, if a corporation) PO Box 565,Aquebogue, NY '11931 .............................................. (Mailing address of applicant) State whether applicant is I3iVI§ �Ievs eeX a��Xarchitect, ! Ixztorrt cltal t iail7r i �ii�txiiii ?r Ranald.A..Denzs,.A.I,.,A„_P;C. (Architect) Name of owner of premises ... Riverhe.ad .Building.....Supply... ....................:.................................. (as on the tax roll or latest deed) ' If applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer. . ............................... (Name and title of corporate officer) Builder's License No. . ,Not Selected Plumber's License No. .. . .....................: Electrician's License No. .,t .......1! ....... .. . Other Trade's License No. n .... .%............ . 74500 Main `Road, Route 25, Greenport, NY Location of land on which proposed work will be done. ... ............................... I .......,.. ............... ............. ........ .................... ..................................... . House Number Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section ......46..:....... Block '.... 1 .......... Lot ... 1. . 46 1 2.1.' Subdivision ........................ Filed Mup No. Lot ................ (Name) State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy ..Bua•lding. Supply. ........................:................ . b. Intended use and occupancy Building Supply Sales . _ _ • .. , • , , .. . t X 3. Nature of work (check which ai5plicable): New Building .......... Addition .......... Alteration ......... Repair .......... . ... Removal ............... Demolition :.3 , .. ..... Other Work ............. . (Description) 4. Estimated Cost $1, 500, 000:00 ........... Fee ...................................... ......................... (to be paid on Filing this application) 5. If dwelling, number of dwelling units ............... Number of dwelling units on each floor ................ Ifgarage, number of cars ........ ......................... .......... I ............. 6. *If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use ..................... 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front ............... Rear .............. Depth ............... Height ............... Number of Stories........................................................ Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: FrontRear . Depth ...................... Height .............. Number of Stories .... . 8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front .... J-1.5.'. • Rear ...11? ........Depth 7 i .... Height 32 ... .....Number of Stories ..Oite:.(1 i ........ ..................... . 9. Size of lot: Front ...3251............... Rear ....394 ............... Depth .693!................ 10. Date of Purchase Approx. AM9 ................. Name of F rme O vner Fl e L bex ................ 11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated . , L10 Id t �n*ustria� p'ar 1 Z: Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation: ........ Yes. , , , _ . , , , , , 13. Will lot be regraded .... Yes .. 11 fill be removed frornr��sdd No 14. Frame of Owner of premises Riverhead E�uil........ ; McWT a der Av 727, , , .. . d re lost . P.......:InFRW No.. . Name of Architect Dortaid•Denis, .A.I.A_, P..C•.. Address ?' Pg� 565. Ml� ? ogue _ Phone No: .7-22-351.1 ... • . . Name of Contractor . Not. Selected ............. Address ................... Phone No:.............. . 15. Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? *yesc....... No......... *If yes, Southold Town Trustees Permit may be required. PLOT DIAGRAM Locate clearly and distinctly all buildings, whether existing or proposed, and: indicate all set -back dimensions from property lines. Give street and block number or description according to, deed, and show street names and indicate whether interior or corner lot. 1. See attached Site Plan. * Occupancy consists of: Retail 8,350 s.f. Office 450 s.f. r - Warehouse 41,625 s.f. TATE OF NEW YORK, S.S :OUNTY OF ................. ............................... (Name of individual signing contract) Bove named. e is the being duly sworn, deposes and says that lie is the applicant (Contractor, agent, corporate officer, etc.) said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this )plication; that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that the ork will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. vom to before me this d ...................... 197.7 Mary Public '..... County iNa1u, 011Ud S 8!0/10108 ..... �jrYafl4n/��/gcS` (Signature of applicant) FAMOM FEB4^ 1998 TOM M& TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR �.� [--,� APPEAL NO. '15 DATE.............................. TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N.Y. QCT pntooe�' 1, (We) Riverhead.Bu�ld ng..Slip.p..1.y...of 129.5...Rul.aski.... SSxeat......... .;........... .. ........ Corp. Name of Appellant Street and Number Riverhead NY HEREBY APPEAL TO ........ ....... ............... ... . Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION FOR PERMIT NO.... ............................ DATED 10/23./97 WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO Riverhead_ Bu_ilding.,Su�ply,__c�.o_.Patricia C. Moore Name of Applicant for permit of P.O.Box 483 315 Westphalia Road, Mattituck NY 11952 ...................................................... .. ........................ Street . . . and Number MuniciP all ty State ( ) PERMIT TO USE ( ) PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY (x) Permit to construct 115' wide building and fence 8' high 7n Road, pt 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY ..........4610 .... ..& ....... 74500 ........... Mai ..... . .... .. Green ....... .. or... ..... ...LI0 .... Street /Hamlet % Use District on Zoning Map District 1000 Section 46 BlockolLotpl 8cu2rJntOwner Riverhead Building Supply Map No Lot No. Prior Owner Aliano 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) Article XIII Section 100-133 and 100-931R 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for (please check appropriate box) (X) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Mop A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap. 62. Cons, Laws Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal (has) (has not) been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request for a variance and was made in Appeal No ........... ................... Doted ............... ...r.............. ................... REASON FOR APPEAL ( ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 ( 3 A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested for the reason that Two parcels zoned LIO are combined for a 325' wide parcel on the Main Road, Greenport. The acreage of the entire parcel for the use will be @5.7 acres. The width; of the building is in proportion to the size of the parcel, and will greatly add to the character of the area Forth ZBt (Continue on other side) w.WW" REASON FOR APPEAL Continued I. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties or unneces- sary HARDSHIP because 7. The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shared by all properties alike in She immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district because 3. The Vanonce would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because STATE OF NEW YORK ss :.. COUNTY OF ) Signature Sworn to this ........ day of...... .................. 19�� /G Notary Public AVIRICIA C. MOORS public, Stele of New Yet Suftolk l ouMY- No.48616W Commission Expires June 16. `/ rlWAN`a� S®llTHOL4 1`0 � OWNER STREET �- VILLAGE ' ,` ° i'f DISTRICTS vS16 .LOP in I (ihn1S S � � -- E ':Lt� ACREAGE ��~ i _ - 1n S — W ��r�yx� TYPE OF BUIL' DING` }� �j RES. SSS. VL. 40 FARM COMM. IND, CB. �,MISC. I LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS/ a�JV;/u �o 6/l7/7?'sotp?yY2 aoo i��zAd l✓ FIL!!�`N6'l.aaL$8rt 0 tpJ G'nRF <PG�9 k 4 _ I'' ' _ a a ✓ _ l 1� a s�9 Lid 199�1_ial ° µ 6-0 Ac v w•^ � rd�.,..a ° g+ds. � �l�444,fi.t,.+f 7 +`a ��:+ue FM' °i .� "x � t+ d�f�a!', e r A Zr AGE BUILDING CONDITION NEW – NORMAL BELOW — ABOVE — 79 d /9Ve�-qi.*e - bee—NVI h. Farm Acre Value Per Acre ---Value _ / p- "% 3 ''<21 *r tF. • M R J 04, Tillable 1� ', ' '�^ 0y� <•' �'%� C Tillable 2 Tillable 3 i Woodland Swampland Brushland House Plot Total it i 'TOWN OF SOUTHOLD' PROPERTY RECORD CAND `--OWNER ISTREET 7 �� VILLAGE — DIST. SUB. LOT i U e � 1c. F •� � / 0 h�s< P'�/ _ i� €m v{� tC.�. GI �e ,a,,:.. •�1.,•�./1 FORMER OWNER N E ACR. I - S W TYPE OF BUILDING RE$. SEAS. VL FARM %COMM:. CB. MICS. Mkt. Value ' LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS 9 * vir3 Z. ouel t l a o a oa %G baa )6 66 . 79 r� 9 CF—U—AV . L)1,)Q(=- Vi 17--L" ��. `�Ca yi'L✓ �<�� ���•e ��?1'� ': ." .taia,�se�,..�i<:C_,. ;/a Q,�er �i�ss��' l�.„fdluu.1 Tillable FRONTAGE ON WATER _R &Woodland, .. FRONTAGE ON ROAD 96' 3 Meadowk"►d ,' DEPTH 700 ,p r we Plot BULKHEAD 'y Total COLOR TRIM o\ W 1211 210-10:) �l all u OWNER STREET JVILLAGEDISTRICT SUB., LOT ACREAGE ----. ' FORMER N OWNER S W TYPE OF BUILDING. RES. SEAS. VL. „" FARM COMM.: IND. CB; MISC. LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS, x,.13✓ -!s} -do ,lh -fir .a .'tz7=;Nor-�`*a�`.L:'"�'F`,'�''..i"e>} a „zy faw •^r ' .. —' G>ani �� f',1�c'•e c /uc rye / 4 - 6 `a ( �L7rA AGE BUILDING CONDITION o �(� a NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE Fa�rri Acre Value Per Acre Value _ 1a Tillable:'] -1 ,ifs e � Tillable: 2 —--T(77,—- Tillable, 3'.— WoOdland Swampland----- rr'� " �BrUShland� House Plot ,- � rr Y ��y ' Sa {t < T i- 1 V am ffi.m ±2`4� �Ye q,{f 'a, ttri`b�Siy� ��W""....--. __._ °...a•._..._. K �'`r � �Ku r.Ra 4Ya i`,�" ggas 'o- r ^n 0 M�PRPP ,9'19 MAS'Aloe AQP o✓E � ', .: .. - �� � �. " X26 .� O+, -. . - , - _'^ :`.;�'�''`;;==""�' - :.� •x,18. �� .i. O r .s ;. +w O _ "fir:. . J� :rf } -� ;�r,• �•� �.':, ��' o . i' - - .i: s. "rE r'C • ,,.�'...'il - 'Yf�� ':.%fl.[',c� Wo . 1 ,i." _ �a —:C� ��, �;ry• (1'i,'-' .t„�i�' �f ::ti'A,: �•,T :t'�=7V 41i :Ir � _� ,::V.' '.), `:. � .tib ”<'�` 'r Ci :,.S• , sm/. ;Simi � ' � -'' `•` �~ - ` • .. , It cl \ ':l=r _ .._ •'fie " '`' �'�`',-`'- - •. rn � _ - .. `.f r,�, e;�?.ham.., '��aa _ .. .��' 'r� «,R_• j�. - , gid' _ '� � .. •41 ;-: ..,,y ��:A; • ^t'`� t� Q ' ,_1 vC rf' s 21 , - �'„ E4: t `-/l.,�i•• ..f �:R y�h:_ ' :��' •� rte+? .f•f:\". /�/� j,• !"• r . G.4 .:i•.. lY•L:,.�,,� ;,�.��- �Qy �Q :Gs�((�•,'�yy� r*,. �;�' - .� {'`�= fit ..' .,:. � �:,' y� ' R yl�. ,:1�;•�1 .:X'.'. _ '.� :.i :+a;.. � �t±.•;.Z'rN :,ti. < \ _ - �:1. :�4•,t :.P+ 'J'i::itl�r.' y..✓'l•cbyy .p , , tom„-,1✓•w,' CONCRC}g• ., - :� iR - i; i. r s`+_ l'? , �.i:. `- r, F . - Y u -;,*'•' ,41',v' `� t- • /�,,�� QS. 9.9 .. - _ •*4:,,.::. �' _, - � �.`t .-.est: z;.•:t r�.2 E- � r.,.J � �'-�'--- 3 - .�' F�r43YTNIA -' _ - �, •`` h�''4';; - .. C`: +. N 730 34' OOa W c, N/F NICHOLAS ALIANO VACANT' LAND _ �'GrrYQO B L/Ch�T' daimla'S.S ^ 6 - - - � •:�"2 •mac, ' Ar, r .. Ya '1. ��y1..,,�,t'lf,' _ , , .. <IVV/ l.:i•` •-M�71-+r./.}•1 :. 00. vz IN tL,, Po ... MO.L "4p Y N IN N.V-."-M W__ Qd Z7 CIVV5 - i 05 lPy. 1.0 Aj MNi v- dY sm- M ,Avi W4 Y�q_ + ,r2 .s+i, S 1, - •:C�.If` •�'�-�� :, V.- :P• t C e qw,� �� I. ������'�al.�� �a':i ri+ ' - s,., _; s' ;..;, 'fitK,3 ,'.'� wr... c� }:s p;' -'.1 •-r.. IVA o o oo/, e) DO vdg to A -1, rVjAw Ow Jo4rurAr. , V.f 01 AF • .. 4 1,4 wr T� k, x%a r�-2, A -1, rVjAw Ow Jo4rurAr. , V.f 01 AF • .. 4 1,4 wr T� k, x%a i PATRICIA C. M®®RE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (516) 765-4330 Fax: (516) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Secretary January 15, 2002 Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Riverhead Building Supply Appl, No. 4547 Dear Chairman and Board members: Riverhead Building is' before the Planning Board for approval of the amended site plan. The public hearing was opened on January 14, 2002 and left open pending your communication. Enclosed is a print of the proposed site plan which shows the Planning Board reviewed and recommended improvements. The Building Inspector raised two issues prior to certification of the site plan: First: Appeal No 4547 granted relief for the width of the' building to 115, provided that the building was set back an additional 10 (110 total). In appeal. 'No ,4547 the front building (along Route 25) was connected to the rear building. Due to i fire code'. issuesthe new amended site plan provides for a detached building (building 2). 'Pursuant,, to Section 100-133 (C) "A project shall be divided into separate structures so that, no single structure shall have more than i 60 linear feet of frontage on one street. The setbacks of multiple structures on a parcel may vary, provided that the average setback of the structures meets the setback required above and all buildings are at least 75 feet from the right-of-way." Please note that only Building 1 has frontage on the road. The rear building is in the "rear yard", behind the front building, more than 300' back from Route 25. It was my belief, as well as the former building inspector's, that the variance ran with the land, the relief requested was the same (applicable to Building 1) therefore Riverhead Building Supply could proceed to obtain amended site plan without another variance from 100-133. Issue 2: Parking setback has been questioned by Mike Verity. RBS has complied with 100-132 Bulk, area, and parking regulations of 100-191 and 100-192, incorporated by reference. Mike Verity saw your reference to 100-131 in your decision. We believed you intended to refer us to our obligation to comply with whatever provisions of 100-131 were applicable. We and the Planning Board believed that we had complied with all parking requirements, and 100-131 (9) is not applicable. Moreover, the relocation of parking in order to conform to a 50 setback would result in insufficient parking at the retail building, and placement of parking in areas that the Planning board wishes to keep open for vehicle and truck access. The Planning board needs to determine the most suitable placement of parking. Site plan issues are correctly before the Planning board, 100-131 (9) if applied as Mike Verity suggests will interfere with good site plan review. The Planning Board and staff did not apply this section of the code with either, the present or the previously approved site plan. To my knowledge, 100-131 has not been applied to the parking for a "principle use", in this case a wholesale business, warehouse and building material storage and sale (i.e. lumberyard). Section 100-131 (C) is intended to apply to accessory uses Moreover, Riverhead Building Supply is a preexisting nonconforming building (with existing parking, loading, storage etc.) and a legally permitted use. The amended site plan is more conforming in all respects. The parking, landscaping and location of the buildings is much more conforming than the existing conditions. We have certainly complied with the intent of the zoning code. The Building Inspector has asked that I refer this request to your board prior to his certification and in order to proceed with the site plan approval. I do not believe he wishes to send us to your board for variances, he asks that your board clarify the decision granting the variance, and respond to him accordingly. If your communication is favorable, Mike Verity will be comfortable with this, the Planning board is ready to approve the site plan. Thank you for your assistance, we are very anxious to proceed with construction, we would ask the board to consider this request at your earliest convenience. VIP-ry tr ly yours, -�'atrlcia C. Moore CC: Fred Webber Mike Verity Riverhead Building Supply t 0T)ICT Off' BOARD OFAPPEALS (516) 765-1809 ZBA tel. Southold Town Hall 765-90 74, &V 5309.5 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 June 29, 1.998 By Fax and Reqular Mail Patricia C. ,.Moore, Esq... Moore & Moore 5.1020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971. Re: ' Variance Determination (Riverhead Building Supply Corp.) DearM44-0--Ore: Enclosed please find a copy of the Appeals Board's determination, with conditions, regarding the above project. Before construction activities may be commenced, issuance of. a building permit is required. Please contact the Planning _Board and Building .Department directly at 765-1802 regarding further reviews. A copy of this variance determination has been transmitted to each the Planning Office and the Building Department for their update. Very truly yours, GERARD �'/6OEHRIf KBE Encl. CHAIRMAN cc w/ encl: Building Department Planning Board Original filed with Town Clerk's Office i; . JUL - I APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman James Dinizio, Jr. Lydia A. Tortora Lora S. Collins George Horning o�oSUFFoc�c� 0 W BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ZBA Fax (516) 765-9064 Telephone (516) 765-1809 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 23, 1998 - . . Appl. No. 4547 - RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY CO. PARCEL 1000-46-1-1 and 2.1 STREET & LOCALITY: Buildings #74610 and 74500, Main Road (State Route 25) , Greenport, NY DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: March 23, 1998, May 14, 1998 and June 11, 1998 PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION:- The above -identified property is located on . the south side of Main Road, Greenport, and contains a total combined lot area .of 5.938 acres. The "re -zoning plan" site layout map RZ-1 dated July 18, 1996 prepared by Donald A. Denis, Architect, has been submitted to show the land area and footprints of the two existing ' buildings . Also submitted are drawings dated June 11, 1997 for a proposed principal building, with retail area at the northerly front portion, and remaining areas consisting of vestibule, design center,. - -receiving and office.= =-areas, inside storage areas, accessorylunchroom and mechanical room. Buffer areas are shown around the perimeter of -the property, and an outside uncovered storage area of 15,000 sq. ft. located in the easterly side Yard. Also shown on the plan is an outside storage area which is . proposed- to conform to the current accessory use regulations for this LIO Zone District. No building or canopy area .is proposed over this storage area and there was no basis addressed in the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval with respect to this part of the plan. BASIS OF APPEAL: Building Inspector's January 2, 1998 Notice of Disapproval which reads as follows: "...1) the proposed -structure being located in an LIO District is permitted to have a maximum of 60 feet of frontage on one street. The proposed building is approximately 115 ft. facing Rt. 25. Pursuant to Article XIII, Section 100-133C; 2) When fences are located in or along side and rear yards, they shall not exceed 6-1/2 feet in height, pursuant to 100-231B...." AREA VARIANCE RI TED BY APPLI is requesting, variances regarding: 1) - an increas building from code limitation of 60 feet to 115 feet (a/k/a Main Road) in this Light -Industrial -Office (2) Fencing up to 8 -ft. in height along side and rear [T:- The applicant 3d -width of principal wide facing Route 25 (LIO) District; and property lines. Page 2 - June 23, 1998 ZBA Meeting Appl: #4547 - Riverhead Building Supply Parcel: 1000-46-1-1 and 2.1 (combined) REASONS AND BOARD ACTION: Based on all testimony, documentation, personal observation 'of the board members, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: 1. Applicant -proposes to construct a metal drive-thru warehouse with, a showroom/building • supply store at the front. The total ,.square footage is approximately 50,424 sf.- The 115 -foot width is proposed to allow vehicles to enter_ to east side of the building to pick. up. drywall, roofing, lumber and similar supplies, and then pay at the exit on the west side. The smaller store in the _front would contain a showroom and smaller supplies. 2. The applicant has submitted an extensive landscaping plan for the entire property and has agreed to help mitigate the visual impact of the width of the building by moving it back to a distance of 110 feet from the Main Road in order to provide an additional 10 -foot landscape buffer. X. The property contains a total' of 5.9 acres and. has 325 feet -of-- frontage on - Main Road. The adjacent properties are commercially zoned and developed property, with the exception of a residential condominium complex to the east. FOR' THESE REASONS, the Board determines as follows: - In -considering this application, the Board finds that a variance for an_ 8 -foot high fence, and a variance for a building width of 115 feet are the minimum necessary and adequate -.and . at- the same time will preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood, and the health, safety and welfare of the community. 1. Grant of an area variance will not produce an undesirable change -in the character of the neighborhood or detriment to nearby properties. The proposed lumber yard supply building is a permitted use in the LIO District. the use is compatible with adjacent commercial uses, and the large size of the property and extensive landscape plan will provide a sufficient buffer from the residential/ condominium complex. The 8 -foot high fence will provide security and protection of the public as well. (2) The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some _ method, feasible for applicant to pursue, other than an area variance because -the 60 -foot code limitation would not permit room for storage of material and for vehicles to have sufficient. clearance to maneuver safety in the drive-thru operation proposed. (3) The requested area variance is substantial and represents a 95+ - percent reduction in. the code required 60 ft. minimum width. However the specific location, large ' size of the property. - and . extensive landscaping proposed help mitigate the degree of the variance. (4) The difficulty situation has been self-created .and relates to the applicant's desire to establish a drive-thru type of lumber business that requires a large -width structure in order to operate. Page 3 - June 23, 1998 ZBA Meeting Appl. #4547 - Riverhead Building Supply Parcel: 1000-46-1-1 and 2.1 (combined) (8) The proposed variance will not have an adverse , effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because the property is a large commercially zoned parcel,. and the proposed use is in keeping with many others in the vicinity. The applicant has submitted extensive landscaping plan for the entire property and has agreed to help mitigate the visual impact of the width of the building by moving it back to a distance of 110 feet ' from the Main Road in order -to provide an additional 10 -ft. landscape buffer. RESOLUTION/ACTION: On motion by Member Dinizio, seconded by Member Horning, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the variances requested subject to the following CONDITIONS: - 1. In order to help mitigate the visual impact of the width of the building, it shall be moved back from the Main Road a minimum distance of 110 feet in order to provide an additional 10 -foot landscape buffer. 2. ' The 8 ft. high fencing along the most easterly property line shall be. slatted . �. 3. Accessory open storage of materials and off-street parking areas shall comaly with the ..provisions of Section 100-131 and 100-101 inclusive. VOTE OF THE BOARD: AYES: MEMBERS 'DINIZIO, TOR:TORA, HORNING, AND COLLINS,. NAY: CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER_ (felt that the building width at 115 feet is more than he is willing to ve) . This Resolution was duly ADOPTED 4-1) R ARD P. GOEHRIN ER, C AIRMAN pproved -for Filing 6/27/98 46-1-1 777. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 .) kJ MEMORANDUM 1' BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD J TO: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman, Planning Board FROM: Ed Forrester, Building Department ; DATE: July 14, 1998 RE: Riverhead Building Supply, Site Plan SCTM# 1000-46-1-1 and 2.1 The Building Department has determined that the provisions of Section 100- 131 C(9) do not apply to this project. AUG JUL 15 1998 Southold Town Planning Board COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING July 9, 1998 Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals JUL it, 41998. N! i H( I I STEPHEN M. JONES, A.I.C.P. DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A 14-14 to 23 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the following application(s) submitted to the Suffollc County Planning Commission is/are considered to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county -wide or inter -community impact(s). A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or a disapproval. Applicant(s) Municipal File Number(s) ✓Riverhead Building Supply 4547 Pliaconis, Christopher 4559 Shank, Robert and Ann* 4560 Segrete, Dominick 4568 Frazzitta, Joseph* 4570 Millis, Walter 4571 Chatpar, Prem** 4574 Gaston, Frank 4575 Snyder, Charles 4576 Ratti, Albert and Janice 4580 *Alternative relief appears warranted *With the understanding that the garage will not be used for sleeping quarters. GGN:cc C:\111CC\ZONING\ZONINGkWORKING\LDSIJUL\SH4547.JUL LOCATION H. LEE DENNISON BLDG. - 4TH FLOOR ■ 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY Very truly yours, Stephen M. Jones Director of Planning S/s Gerald G. Newman Chief Planner MAILING ADDRESS P. O. BOX 6 100 IN (5 16) 653-5190 HAUPPAUGE, NY 1 1 788-0099 TELECOPIER (5 1 6) 853-4044 o N7 Z OFFICE OF BOARD OF APPEALS 53095 Maiu' Road, - Southold, NY 11971 (1-516) 765-1809 tel. (1-516) 765-1823 fax . Pursuant to Article of the S3ffolk C =ty dmini strative Code, The Board of P=eals of the Town of Southold, New York, hereby refers the follcwi nsl to -the Suffolk County Planning ('C; =iss: nan: X_ Variance_ from the Zoning Code, Article XIII Secti on 100-133C a n d Section 100-231B Variance from Determination of Southold Town Building Inspector Special Exception, Article . , Section Special Permit Appeal No:.4547 Applicant: Riverhead Building Supply Location of Affected Land: 74610 and 74500 Main Rd., Oreenport, NY .County Tax Map Item No.: 1000- 46-1-1 and 2.1 Within 500 feet of: Town or Village Boundary Line Body of Water (Bay, Sound or Estuary) xw State or County Road, Parkway, Highway, Thruway Boundary of Existing or Proposed County, State or Federally Owned Land Boundary of Existing or Proposed County, State or Federal Park or other Recreation Area Existing or Proposed Right -of -play of any Stream or Drainage Channel Owned by the County or for which the County has established Channel Lines, or Within One Mile of a Nuclear Power Plant Within One Mile of an Airport Comments: Applicant is requesting permission, to construct proposed structure in an LIO District —building width and fence height Copies of Town file and related documents enclosed for your review. Dated: 6151) l9� 6, / W i"V/ J PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. �D�j Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 ChairmanC P.O. Box 1179 WILLIAM J. CREMERS Cz 2 Southold, New York 11971-0959 CA KENNETH L. EDWARDS �y • �� Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. Fax (631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OCT � ,� 20oi TO: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector FROM: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer RE: Riverhead building and Supply Main Road, Riverhead SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 DATE: October 10, 2001 The Board of Appeals granted a building width variance on June 23, 1998, for a site plan approved by the Planning Board on August 10, 1998. This August 10, 1998 approved plan was never built. A new application has replaced the previously approved plan. The new retail building is 115' wide, as was the original building, however it has a different footprint. The original storage build was connected to the retail building and was also 115' wide. The new storage building is 91' wide and is a separate building. Do these changes require a new width variance by the Board of Appeals? Cc: Zoning Board of Appeals ✓ i I � SUFFot� �o co I� ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE c 1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK y P.O. Box 1179 p Southold, New York 11971 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS 7i �� , , Fax•(516) 765-1823 MARRIAGE OFFICER ��,( �� fi" Telephone (516) 765-1800 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 12, 1998 The Southold Town ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE will meet on Wednesday, August 19, 1998 at 4:30 P.M. in the Meeting Hall at Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York. AGENDA 1. Riverhead Building Supply, Greenport 2. Petrocelli Winery, Peconic 3. Farmstand, Cutchogue Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk Committee Members Town Board Town Attorney Chief of Police Supt. of Highways Departments Newspapers Radio News -_1.2 "... . O7'FTCE 0 BOARD OFAPPEALS (516)'765-1809 ZBA tel. Southold Town Hall 765-90 74, far 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 ****.** It C,6 � 3pla ,o By -Fa" x and Regular Mail Patricia C. Moore, Esq. Moore & Moore 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 June 29, 1.998 Re: Variance Determination (Riverhead Building Supply Corp.) Dear M&iore: Enclosed please find a copy of the Appeals Board's determination, with conditions, regarding the above project. Before construction activities may be commenced, issuance of a building permit is required. Please contact the Planning Board and Building Department directly. at 765-1802 regarding further reviews. A copy of this variance determination has been transmitted to each the Planning Office and the Building Department for their update. Encl. cc w/ encl:. Building Department :.� Planning Board Very truly yours, CHAIRMAN Original filed with Town Clerk's Office Vl pA, 5 9 IIS,,Andrew J. Ficurilli 58 Wilmarth Avenue "Greenport, NY 11944 " -- --=3--June 2, 1998 Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Board Members, I am writing this letter in lieu of a personal appearance at the public hearing to be held on June 11 in reference to the Riverhead Building Supply Corporation application for the Greenport project. Concerns have been raised by residents of the Driftwood Cove complex with regard to fire safety. The proposed building will be fully equipped with fire detection and suppression equipment that meets or exceeds the applicable fire codes. The lumberyard in its' current state has no such systems, and poses a much greater hazard should a fire occur. It appears that Riverhead Building Supply Corporation has carefully planned this project, especially in the area of fire safety. As an ex -Chief and current member of the Greenport Fire Department, I am pleased with their efforts. They should be granted the necessary variances in order to proceed. Sincerely, 7_�0/' Andrew J. Ficurilli WAINCO FUNDING, L.L. C. LICENSED MORTGAGE BANKER NYS Banking Department 11939-0603 May ,3.1, 1998 Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Board -of Appeals Southold Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, N. Y. 11971 Re: Riverhead Building Supply Addendum Dear Mr. Goehringer; Tel. (516) 477-0388 Fax (516) ,477-8286 This addendum, is to formerly object and remind Mrs. Moore, wife of Councilman Moore. that her statement concerning outdoor storage is erroneous. The proposed building plan, shows the east side of the outside storage area which will accommodate the toxic material, to be uncovered. This uncovered site increases the incident of accident ratio by at least tenfold. Since this area is not monitored by smoke detectors or the physical presence of a watchman, .it is a disaster waiting to happen, In the matter,of Mrs. Moore's erroneous statement, she should be . reminded...as ...a...,sworn officerof the court, and. a Member. of the local Bar Association the penalty of perjury. ' Apparently, Riverhead Building Supply, has the best interest of the Town of Riverhead and its residents by fighting the Home Depot Shopping Center on Route 58. But, in the case of its Greenport yard, they effectively are saying "THE HELL WITH GREENPORT AND ESPECIALLY THE RESIDENTS OF DRIFTWOOD COVE. very truly y o rs, r� JOHN J. FARRELL JJF/11 a PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (516) 765-43301, i Fax: (516) 765-4643 1 199� II, Margaret Rutkowski i,'; Secretary May 21, 1998 Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Riverhead Building Supply - Appl. No. 4547 Dear Chairman and Board Members: Your clerk was kind to advise me that the Board had adopted a resolution at a Special Board meeting reopening the closed hearing on Riverhead Building Supply. Please be advised that we object to the Board's action. There is no legal authority in Town Law 267-a, the Southold Town Zoning ordinance at section 100-271, or adopted rules of procedure which authorize the Board's action. Moreover, your action is unnecessary. The only issue before your Board is a variance for the building width. We are satisfied that the record before your Board, after two public hearings,, addresses the standards to be considered for a variance and the unique design and use of the proposed building. We are presently before the Southold Planning Board for site plan review and all issues related to site plan are being properly addressed by the Planning Board. It is my understanding that your reason for reopening the hearing was regarding the storage of materials. The site plan submitted to the board accurately depicts "bulk lumber storage". I have reviewed a copy of the transcript from the March 23, 1998 hearing (May 14, 1998 hearing transcript was not available) and found no discussion of material storage, or inconsistent statement. The site plan was before your board and both the board and public had adequate time to ask questions regarding the plan. Material storage is not relevant or material to your decision. In addition, "wholesale business, warehouses and building material storage and sale" are permitted uses in the LIO zoning at section 100-131 A.(3). Riverhead Building Supply is a lumber yard, every item that they stock will be displayed and stacked on racks inside the proposed building, the customers will buy material from the racks; however, this does not eliminate the need for material storage. The material storage is fundamental to a lumber yard use, is a permitted use in the zone, and is unrelated to the variance application. Therefore, this variance should be granted. The grant of the variance is supported by the facts, the record is complete, and we are confident that we could defend in court the Zoning Board's grant of the variance. We ask that you reconsider your resolution to re -open the hearing and grant the variance. Very truly yours, atricia C. Moore PCM/mr cc: Allen M. Smith, Esq. Riverhead Building Supply �® �nc.Qosures s I I � , �G )L+� g :, Page 43 - Hearing Transcripts May 14, 1998 - Board of Appeals lew/�L May 14, 1998 Hearing Southold Town Board of Appeals 7:25 P.M. - Appl. No. 4547 - Application by RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY. Continued hearing from March 23, 1998 for Variances based upon the Building Inspector's January 2, 1998 Notice of Disapproval which reads as follows: 1) the proposed structure being located in an LIO District is permitted to have a maximum of 60 feet of frontage on one street. The proposed building is approximately 115 feet facing Rt. 25,. Article XIII, Section 100-133C; 2) When fences are located in or along side and rear yards they shall not exceed 6-1/2 feet in height,. pursuant to 100-231B..." Location: 74610 and 74500 Main Road, Greenport; 1000-46-1-1 and 2.1, combined as a single lot. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER : I guess we are ready. Mrs. Moore? PATRICIA MOORE, ESQ: Thank you. This evening the Goodale Family is here representing Riverhead Building Supply. Mr. Smith, Allen Smith from Riverhead, co -counsel, and we are here to answer any questions you might have. When I went back to my file I realized that it has been quite some time since we had the last hearing. I know that you have an extensive record on the history of this legislation, and we discussed the unique nature of this project and the design elements of this facility and the use of the facility and if you have any additional questions since that date - CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: What happened with the Planning Board? MRS. MOORE: The Planning Board, I went to the Planning Board. And they wrote to the Zoning Board a response saying that they reviewed the application. I had gone into them and said, our preference obviously is to stay where we are. We put up the green stakes so that you would see where 100 feet falls; and in fact, when you are there, you noticed that the Seven -11 the 100 feet is actually a little bit behind the back end of Seven -11. So as you move the building back, I think it probably is going to detract from that line of sight because now you're going to really see the back end, Seven -11 back end. Nonetheless we went to the Planning Board and said, we just cannot move the parking. We can do anything but move the parking. They said, well, they had no problem with the original plan. They came back and said that they would, if we moved the building back by 10 feet and increased the green space by 10 feet, the parking remains where it is, and the way to solve the concern about the view of the parking, is that there'll be some low lying shrubs, green shrubs that will on the side of the road, on the Main Road and block the view of the parking. Certainly nothing that is going to interfere with parking and accessing, pedestrian r Page 44 - Hearing Ti-aul'scripts :_May 14, 1998 - Board of Appeals assess. But, it'll all be done through the site plan process. But, that's one way of hopefully resolving some questions that the Zoning Board may have had. So you know, it'.s obvious. Our first choice and the law, the code allows us to be where we have proposed to be. In fact, the average setback is about 40 feet and we're back at 100. If we can move this process along because they are certainly they're poised to begin - we're delayed at the site plan of stage because of this variance (request) . If they're willing to compromise, they've told me that they're willing. Certainly not something that they're happy about, but if the Board cannot get a consensus for purposes of approval, we will agree to your alternative relief. So, if you choose to impose alternative relief. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Alright, any questions of the attorney for the applicant? Alright; we will then go on and ask if there is anybody else in favor of this application that would like to speak? Mr. Hulse: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Mr. Hulse., , how are you tonight Sir? MR. HULSE: My name is Fred Hulse. I live at 35 Sunset Lane in Greenport and I just came to speak in favor of this because I think Mr. Goodale is trying to do something for the area, and his original proposal looked very good to me. It's going to make the area much more attractive then it is now without the piles of lumber laying all around. The building looked pretty good, from what I've heard of it and that area is certainly not going to detract from it, a bus garage and telephone building and a light plant and there's . never going to be anything behind him, except railroad tracks and marshland. So, I think it behooves the Board to move this along and let the business man get going.- It provides a lot of. employment in the area and of course any extension also provides taxes to, the Greenport School District plus the Town of Southold. So, I think the. Board would be well to take this under consideration and give the man his due and let him move along. Thank you. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Thank you. Anybody else would like to speak in favor? Anybody like to ' speak against? Good evening Sir, would you state your name for the record please. MR. FARRELL: Good' evening, my name is John Farrell. I'm a resident of, the Cove, I call it, other people call it Driftwood Cove but, I like to call it the Cove. There are 100 residents where I am and I'm 130 feet away from the 'new building. Now I've done a little research in terms of demographics. For the quarter ending the end of March, '325 Building 'Permits have been, issued. So being very generous, -I'll say 2,000 for the year, alright. We'll say 300 a week walk-ins or drive-ins, and 200 tickets a week sent out via trucks. Not very much for 'a facility this large. My only- - point is this to start, that this part of the building is going to be used by someone else in the future. What is going_ to be is the best and highest use would be a manufacturing facility, not a lumber yard or a supply house because I'll tell you why. Penny Lumber is not going to fold o L Page 45 - Hearing Trailscripts .. May ;14, 1998 - Board of Appeals their tent and go silently into the night. Every building lot that's taken up is one less job or complete house that is going to be built. So where does that lead us? It leaves us with a large facility and no one to serve us. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Thank you. Is there anybody else would like to speak against the application? Yes, Sir, state your name for the record. MR. RUTKOWSKI: Anthony Rutkowski. Based on the .development at this hearing, there is no evidence whatsoever of the hardship or other legal requirements rationale to the granting of such a variance, and indeed the record indicates that the applicant's desire of such a variance is based solely on convenience. It is my understanding that convenience is not a legal basis or granting of any variance,. let alone any drastic variance such as been required which doubles the permitted size of the premise. We also continue our objection to the absent support, excuse me, on the absence of any supporting traffic or environmental impact studies substantiating the effects of this requested variance. I wish the Board would reconsider this, a lot of important things going on down there and you know, there's two sides to every story. Thank you. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER : Anybody else like to speak against? (None) Mrs. Moore, anything in rebuttal? I have a question for you. MRS. MOORE: Just to touch on a few points that were raised. First of all, it is a unique design. We did go through an extensive record; and the submission of the area variance criteria were submitted in writing on the original application. In addition, the history of this Code is really what we're addressing, and whether or not it was even intended to address this type of use. But we did go into that extensively, and I don't what to make a very long, turn this into another long meeting. Secondly, the fire issue, this building will be sprinkled. We've explained that or responded to that question previously -and in writing, in writing. So, it is actually going to be much safer than, I don't want to say it's unsafe now but, even safer than it is presently. The fact that the materials will be stored, also takes care of any concerns with regard to the chemicals in the treated Number 2, my feeling about the fire hazard here. I live 130 feet from an ascendary bomb. Not too much smaller than Hiroshima, if it let's go. Alright? Think about what I'm saying, there's 100 residents that will immediately be put out of home and could very well be burned, or seriously injured, children and other matters. We also have CCA or, that special treated lumber. which consists of arsenic, nothing else. Arsenic. On fire it becomes toxic. We don't have gas maskS anymore, that was during the forties. That's all I wish to say, but if this does not be settled now, and they have this, I'm going to leave you with three words: "Fire, fire, fire." Thank you. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Thank you. Is there anybody else would like to speak against the application? Yes, Sir, state your name for the record. MR. RUTKOWSKI: Anthony Rutkowski. Based on the .development at this hearing, there is no evidence whatsoever of the hardship or other legal requirements rationale to the granting of such a variance, and indeed the record indicates that the applicant's desire of such a variance is based solely on convenience. It is my understanding that convenience is not a legal basis or granting of any variance,. let alone any drastic variance such as been required which doubles the permitted size of the premise. We also continue our objection to the absent support, excuse me, on the absence of any supporting traffic or environmental impact studies substantiating the effects of this requested variance. I wish the Board would reconsider this, a lot of important things going on down there and you know, there's two sides to every story. Thank you. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER : Anybody else like to speak against? (None) Mrs. Moore, anything in rebuttal? I have a question for you. MRS. MOORE: Just to touch on a few points that were raised. First of all, it is a unique design. We did go through an extensive record; and the submission of the area variance criteria were submitted in writing on the original application. In addition, the history of this Code is really what we're addressing, and whether or not it was even intended to address this type of use. But we did go into that extensively, and I don't what to make a very long, turn this into another long meeting. Secondly, the fire issue, this building will be sprinkled. We've explained that or responded to that question previously -and in writing, in writing. So, it is actually going to be much safer than, I don't want to say it's unsafe now but, even safer than it is presently. The fact that the materials will be stored, also takes care of any concerns with regard to the chemicals in the treated Page 46 - Hearing Trai-iscripts May .14, 1998 - Board of Appeals lumber. The fact that they will be under cover, they will be sprinkled, and they'll be under more controlled environment should make it even more stable than they are now. And you have a question? CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: As you know, again we're missing a Board Member. We had talked the 115 feet, and we know that the code reads 60, and we know that we're close to almost double the variance size in reference to what the criteria is in the code concerning this, and there was some touching at the last hearing in reference to that 115 feet. My question is 'what is the bare minimum that could be dealt with in reference to width of this building - you don't have to answer this question tonight. Ok? MRS. MOORE: But, let me explain to you because I know you're asking, is there any lesser sum. We had actually considered a larger building. This is a reduced version. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: I am aware of that. MRS. MOORE: And in fact it's 60 feet on a standard acreage which would be typically about 150 feet road frontage. We actually have, I don't have the map right in front of me, but, I think we have 300 feet, 350 feet of road frontage. You have the maps there. I can pull it out. But, we touched on that last time, that the reason the code doesn't make sense is because it creates a 60 foot requirement regardless of the road frontage, and we have actually doubled the road frontage by the acquisition of the extra parcel. So, it is actually consistent with the intent I believe, if we were to take 60 feet of the original parcel and then 60 feet of the other, you'd have 120 feet in length. We just couldn't put those two together. And we're creating a better design of the entire property. So I don't think that that has, I know we talked about it. Do you want to consider something smaller? I don't think so because I know we've talked about it. So. This is the size and if it's necessary for purposes of the proper vehicular access. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Ok. We'll then ask if anybody wants to speak before we actually close this hearing. Does anybody want to make any further comments? Anything - that something may not have been touched upon? Any Board Members have any specific questions? Ms. Collins? MEMBER COLLINS: No. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Mrs. Tortora? MEMBER TOROTRA: No. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Mr. Horning? MEMBER HORNING: No. Page 47 '- Hearing Transcripts .�,-,May.,14, 1998 - Board of Appeals CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Ok. We thank you all for your courtesy and we will take everything into consideration, we wish you a safe home and have a good *evening. Hearing no further comment, I'll make a motion closing the hearing reserving decision until later. MEMBER HORNING: Second. Motion carried. See Minutes for Resolution. End of Hearings. fRliP{'DI`lis',ICiPi FIT_ Pi -C-1 :r.14: f, wl. 4 4 t + 1.1 .1 -1: t j I i + f t:.i 4. 1 1 f. 4, 1 1 1 A i i r,f + 'i 'A f' 1 4- 4:.} .1..4':I f i +.+'i - -i + I T i f 4. j� ,J: t 1119 E TER!'? 1:I IAL HODE" T I HE t"EF -1-1 FICHT 1 DLF, J, 1j, P-, F 0, - 'T i t ,4 r. 55- Page - Hears -i Transcripts' March 23, 19,98 -Board of Appeals CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Mrs. Moore, while your setting up for the next hearing, we're.going to go to take a short break. 9:03 P.M. - Appl. No. 4547 - RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: This is a request,for a var.iance'based upon the Building Inspector's January 2, 1998 Notice. of Disapproval which reads .as follows:."...1) the proposed structure being ,located in an LIO District is permitted to..have a. maximum of 60 feet.of-frontage on one street. The proposed building is approximately 115 ft. facing Rt -25. Pursuant to Article XIII, Section 100-13.3C; (2) When fences are located in or along side and rear yards, they shall not exceed 671/2 feet in height, pursuant to 100-231B..." Location of Property: 74610 and 74500 Main Road,- Greenport, N.Y.;- 1000-46--1-1 and 2.1 combined as a single lot. We have a variety of site plans. Site plan drawing S1 is the one that I like, the best. The most recent date on that is October 21, 1997, indicating the approximate size of this building at 5,000 sq.. ft..plus MEMBER COLLINS:, 50,000 Mr. Chairman. CHAIRMAN, GOE14RINGER: Pardon- me, 50,000, plus, thank you for correcting me. I was only off by 45,000 and indicating the site plan of the parking. area in the front and I,have a copy of the Suffolk County Tax Map_ indicating this and surrounding properties in the area, Good evening Mrs. Moore:, -again. MRS. MOORE: Good evening. What I'd like to do is for the record, describe; again, I know all of you've been there, but for the record, describe what's presently existing on the site. Before I start, I apologize, I have, I want to introduce everyone who's here, certainly from Riverhead Building :Supply, Russell Goodale, Edgar Goodale, Jeff Bauer, who is the- Manager.,. Allen Smith,, Co -counsel, Don Denis, Architect, and I'm, aware that there are many other. individuals here, certainly contractors who, are observing tonight and J believe in many cases- in favor,,of this application. I'll let them speak for themselves if they. wish to. To. begin with, the existing conditions of the site, Riverhead Building., Supply presently. occupies 2.2 acres of the westerly parcel. It's a, the parcels are'shown on a site plan prepared by Don Denis -and it ,would be identified as Lot number 1. The parcel ,has a..road frontage of 20.0 feet and extends 600 feet in depth going to the Long Island Railroad. Riverhead Building Supply contain, consists right now. of retail building. in the front, 2 warehouse -buildings, as well as, outside storage, in, the. rear. The existing buildings are presently setback approximately 27 feet from the main road. The easterly structure. is. 72 feet wide and one foot oft the easterly property line and the, westerly structure is 45 feet wide and setoff 5 feet off the westerly property 'line. Both structures as I. -submitted to you ,in my application, together are combined 117 feet. We are proposing -115 feet. In addition, the structures are only about 30 feet apart which because of the size of the parcel leaving very_ little. room for- screening and parking. With that in mind certainly they're a. wonderful -client. to have because the 56- Page - Hear�lLg Transcripts March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals first thing that they said to me when we met, was, well what kind of variances do :we need sand I described it and they. said well maybe we should look into acquiring the adjacent parcel and sure enough through their own efforts they acquired a 3.7 acre parcel. That parcel went through a change of zone application to LIO, the Town Board,:the SEQUA review and without exception, except one extension of course, rezoned the parcel to LIO. Both -the Town Board during the rezoning and the Planning Board determined that the proposed development which they had before, and has not significantly changed since its inception, will -be a significant improvement to the existing conditions of the site. What brings us here aside from the security fence, is a 60 foot local law which was adopted in 1995. I went and I researched that local law to find out how it was created and I found from the legislative history, someone, certainly I will quote directly from the record, Supervisor Wickham at the time, he stated that he opened the hearing and he stated, he said, I might very briefly preface these comments by saying that, this legislation is pursued to a policy resolution. That the Board adopted over a year ago the pledged to keep open the character of .Route 48, this is the Main Road, they throw in, he throws in as a ( ) ,other major roads• in the town to avoid strip development appearance and to keep the visual distance that are currently available for people driving through. Again he states, also, to keep Route 48 -as an expressed road without a lot of traffic congestion. The Board I know hasn't changed, deviated from that intent with regard to Route -48.. However, this is the'Main Road and entrance to the corridor into Greenport and this area really. particularly since it went through as rezoning process, the Town Board. determined that this was an appropriate use at this site and LIO is the appropriate location for a- lumber yard and this type of development. Certainly, it will be a great shot in the arm. to -the development of this 'area. Sunrise Coach has done a very lovely building across the way. But, aside from -Sunrise Coach, and this building, there hasn't been much development in the last ten some years. Certainly Janie Mills I think is the lash major change in that., Mr. Dinizio, you're more .familiar with this area than I am' But, I think history, this will be a significant investment in the town. I want to submit -for the record, the legislative history the local law and I highlighted the sections --that or the language that, I quoted to you." 183 or 183 in this particular, when it was adopted, it's another section now, deals with structures that are setback at least 100 feet from a right-of-way. 'This property right off the bat was setback at 100 feet from the .main road.. Section B talks about -that there's an exception to Section A, which means that, which says, that if adjacent parcels are developed you look at the average setback of, the two parcels and then you can establish a closer setback. What'I did is, I also went back to a, I took a long at the site plans that were on record, as well as some measurements that we could determine from an old aerial and it appears that well certainly the existing setbacks for Riverhead Building Supply is 27, Sunrise" -:Coach,, which is across the street, excuse me, Sunrise Coach adjacent parcel is at 42 plus or minus, 711 Southland Corp., is at approximately 35 feet." So, when you talk about an average setback of 42 and 35; 100 feet is a significant setback that we voluntarily put this_ building and designed significant landscape offer, certainly 57 -.Page - Hear:_, Transcripts March 23., 1998 -Board of Appeals,- more ppeals, more than 711. I think if you calculate -10 feet of 711 buffer it's a lot,•, and Sunrise Coach has none. It's all- blacktop. So this is again, significant .improvement and the setback is in accordance with the code, if not greater setback than would be required reading the legislation and taking an average of the two., Across the road you have Phil's -Bar which is maybe 20 foot setback. .New York Telephone approximately 44 foot setback and Sunrise Coach the new building is shown at :50 foot, setback. I have for the Board in addition to the legislative history, I took the site plan of 711 and highlighted the setback that is applicable so that you can again refer to that when your deliberating. I submit to the Board that'this legislation is 60 foot wide' rule- doesn't, make. any sense., When you look at- the legislative intent and where they were trying to address strict development,; it just, it -doesn't make any 'sense and it's just inconsistent with to start with`�the 3 acre lot. size and the. .:200 lot width requirement in the Bulk Schedule. It does not address ,a situation where you .have. added square footage. We,'ve.-now increased the parcel by another 3 plus acres, so you have a 5.7 acre parcel and you're still. using this crazy 60 foot rule. It's,, a prior administration so I can beat up on it. This was really a very poor attempt to address the design of strict. development and certainly overreaching- for a single use business such as Riverhead Building Supply. The Zoning'Board requested input from the Planning Board and they certainly the first time around recommended this application as it's been submitted.: We are before the Planning Board for site plan review. It will be -referred to architectural review, but we can't proceed any further until we've got a variance on ,.the .,lot width. That makes sense. Because -this building is over 'the 60 foot rule, again, 'Riverhead Building ,Supply went back to 100 feet. They have a landscape offer of 25 feet. When you compare this project to every other or every project within the 500., feet of this site, they far exceed any requirement that's in the code and that's the preface just to start with. my -arguments. With regard to variance criteria. Obviously I have to give that to you but, and I'll' go through,. that there's' no undesirable change produced in the character of the neighborhood or, detriment to, nearby properties if, the variance is granted. Again, this .parcel is over 5. acres. 'The Planning Board when they, excuse me, no, the.-Town'.Board when it adopted this change of,. -zone had some language or, their environmental consultants stated and they placed on the record that the proposed change of zone is to prevent better use and the design of the existing Riverhead Building Supply site, the company proposed the state of the art operation that will be include a pickup and pay drive through lumber building. The HD designation to prior zoning did not make sense. It's.less than ideal for residential housing as it -is-located behind 711 store and next to the tracks and the LIO. This project didn't make sense as hamlet, Hamlet Density and the Town Board in adopting the change of zone 'determined that (change ,tape). -this structure will be in conformity. with New York State Fire Prevention Building Codes, -.Handicap Accessibility Laws.. I know. that I submitted a letter.to the Board with regard to certain questions that you had and you have 'that in. your .file with regard., to state mandates as well as sprinklers, that's in .your file. Again this, will be .a significant investment in the Town of Southold and as far as impact. on the character of the 58- Page - Hear-L,Lj Transcripts March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals neighborhood, it'll be an improvement to the character of the neighborhood here, LIO. I'm sure you have questions on the operations of the building. Jeff Bauer whose the manager can describe for you how this, do you want to. describe what goes on inside the building? And what I want you :to "get from this presentation, very important, that this operation that the width ''that's being proposed- is necessary for the operations. I think you know from the application process, what's being proposed and, certainly the site plan and the internal diagram, but the width is based on the drive-t,hrough concept. You want to describe what's"going"to go ori? MR. BAUER: I don't know if.you want to follow with the plan. MRS. MOORE: The plan that I have, in front of _me is the site plan that is last dated October 21, 1997. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Right, the one I read. MRS. MOORE: Yes,.S-1. MR. BAUER: OK, first the customer would enter through the entrance and we'd like them to stop in the retail part of the building, purchase their material and then drive to the east side of the building, enter and drive, proceed in the building and pick up whatever they purchased in a dry, not ice condition; and then exit the building on the west side, get checked out and exit. That's basically operations. MRS. MOORE:' So what you're talking'about here is a building with a width of two 'aisle width to allow for two vehicles as well as truck traffic because a lot of the vehicles that are going to be used are Riverhead Building Supply vehicles that are loaded there and.sent out to the job sites for delivery. Is that correct? MR. BAUER: Correct. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Let me just ask a question. When the trucks are loaded are the trucks out of the building, -when it is open for retail picking up and dropping off?Or, are you still loading trucks? If I was to go to Riverhead now, and see the building which is basically a smaller scale of the tremendously, large building you have in Riverhead. That's -not a sarcastic statement but is a pragmatic -by the way. MRS. MOORE: No; no, in fact, for"the record I` want you to know that this building is comparing a golf ball to a basket ball. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: I understand. MRS. MOORE: OK, you understand the dimensional? CHAIRMAN-GOEHRINGER: Is there a restriction on the .amount of cars that go:into this building,' -dr, you know, the'ingress and egress that exists in the in and out? If- you had say 12 cars in the building, • 59- Page - Hear-.., Transcripts March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals you know, picking up deliveries at certain assorted points, would that be the max that would be in the building, or what's happening in Riverhead in that respect? MR. BAUER: Well, they'd be parking on the side of the aisles for people picking up, so there will always be egress through the center aisle for a vehicle exiting. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Alright. This building is 50,900 sq. ft. The one in Riverhead is -what, 200,000? MRS. MOORE: Riverhead is actually 123,000. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Riverhead is 123,000. BOARD SECRETARY KOWALSKI: You were asking about outside lines. Your first question was about outside lines. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: No, what I'm saying is, there is no outside line use. You're stacking cars outside? How many cars are you allowing in the building? .Have you determined that at all? MR. BAUER: No we haven't. It all depends on ( ) business. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: But, the question I had, was, are you loading and off loading Riverhead Building Supply vehicles at:the same time that, apart from forklifts going in? I'm talking about plated registered vehicles, OK, the trucks that you use that we see all over on the Expressway, you know, all over, Southold Town, Riverhead Town. Again, not a sarcastic statement, a statement of pragmatic significance. Are you loading those and off loading those at the time that retail cars are in there working? MR. BAUER: They will be loading outside the building. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: They will be loaded outside the building. So you'll be going in and out with forklifts with the material off loading those, I mean loading and unloading those trucks outside. MRS. MOORE: I'm not sure if that's a completely accurate statement. No offense, but I think that, well obviously depending on the degree of traffic. I think that's basic. But the facility can accommodate loading their own vehicles internally as well as loading customers vehicles, which are mostly the contractor's bringing their trucks. So, you know, we can accommodate them. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: This was just happen to be at .a point that I wanted to ask that question and I don't mean to convolute the question. It's only a question that I had, that I was concerned about. I've been in the Riverhead building, I had not seen loading and of both, you know, individual customers' vehicles, alright, be them trucks or cars or whatever the case might be or wheeldrives, whatever the case might be and I'm not seeing that, so I would hope that you would allow us to go up there and look at that. 60- Page - Hear -.ay Transcripts March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals MRS. MOORE: You're welcome at anytime, sure. In fact, come into the t office and let yourself be known'and you'll get the tour. CHAIRMAN GOEHRI14GER: Alright, good. Go ahead, I'm sorry, I didn't mean to stop you'.' MRS. MOORE: No, that's alright. I think that. -the point that I want to stress is that, the width of the aisle, both ingress and egress, because you are talking about a flow here, the width of the materials, correct, and the center as well as -on the sides. MR. BAUER: Yes. ` MRS. MOORE: That,the vehicles, two vehicles have to -be able to pass through. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Well that's the purpose of the 115 feet, is what you're telling. MRS. MOORE:-Exactly, exactly. So when we're talking about the need for something greater than 60 feet, again, the use of this building and the Town Board identified it through their secret process it is unique. The Planning Board in their recommendation said, this is a unique concept. That it's essentially covering storage. The storage that is now outside in.the yard and the materials that can be affected by the elements are • now going to be neatly stored, drive in the elements and while you always had Class A number 1 materials, now they'll be even better': So,-true,.it's true. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER:.. Lydia has -a question, Pat. MEMBER TORTORA: The flow -of :traffic on both of the west access and egress and the east access is two way, correct? MRS. MOORE: Yes. The state route -entrances? MEMBER COLLINS: From the highway. MRS. MOORE: From the high, from main road, OK. MEMBER TORTORA: And yet, that's what I'm trying to figure out. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: No, it's one way. MR. BAUER: The arrows are pointing one way. (Everyone making various comments.) MEMBER TORTORA: The access to Route 25, in both access areas. On both sides of the building. MRS. MOORE:--Correct. MEMBER TORTORA: It's two way traffic. 61- Page - Hear_'_.y Transcripts < March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals - MRS. MOORE: You read that correctly.' MEMBER TORTORA: Good.. Now, my question -is this. If someone is coming in from the east side,- and, they want to come through the building to go, because there.is only one in and out _ MRS. MOORE: Yes, you have a one. way. Y - MEMBER TORTORA: Method. So, I'm just trying to figure out, how would they get.to into the,building from the east side? MRS. MOORE: The site, plan is as a law, is the flow of traffic, you're not talking about narrow corners here. of the, for site purposes? MEMBER TORTORA: No. MRS. MOORE: You have certainly. wide .enough aisles., that if you have somebody coming from the west, that has to come in through the entrance on the east,, they will go by the, retail center, presumably stop at the retail, pick-up whatever it,is -that they need from the retail department,or go directly into the lumber storage,, coverage storage area, and come in. These.° are site plan issues that' the Planning didn't seem•to have a problem and this is - MEMBER TORTORA: I was just curious because I was looking at the way the traffic was - flowing and trying to figure out. It•'s very clear how you go through the building, but,, there's only one 'entrance to the building. That's from the east side of the building and if you're accessing it from the west side, I was trying to figure out hoW •'you , would do that . MRS. MOORE: Well, I think the site plan pretty much identifies where the traffic will or, might go. I think Allen can address, your need to the traffic flow as experienced in the .vehicular trips that are anticipated. But, this is, not a.heavily,.used-site, certainly they're going to hope that -they'll get increased use, but, - MEMBER TORTORA: The other question I had was, that I noticed it on the site plan it says, that the required number ,of spaces is 91 spaces and you're providing 48 and - MRS. MOORE: Yes. What you're, the way the parking is calculated, they're using the' covered storage; which 1. if you. didn't cover the storage area, this whole area .is storage, there ,would,be no parking calculations for. storage. It's not a, there's no generation of parking for storage. What they have is a calculation of what they anticipate are the needs of the retail. So really the parking is for the most part addressing the ''retail use, with certainly some parking that's needed for the wholesale end of it. The, I don't want to say wholesale, -the lumber storage, the loading area. If the Planning Department deems that it's necessary to have more parking, they have certainly a great deal of land that., they can- land bank and have P. 62- Page - Hear�..y' Transcripts March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals additional parking, but, they're familiar .with the degree of use of their facility and certainly the parking, this parking .is extremely important to Riverhead Building Supply because ,it is the retail parking_. It's where you and I would .go in to buy our nuts and bolts. 'I wouldn't go; through that facility most, likely with my Minivan. It's kind of sexist, but I think I'd send my -husband to do that. I would go into the retail center. and pick out whatever: I needed. I can say that because I'm female.. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Mrs. Moore, Ms. Collins has a question of Mr. Bauer. You have a question of Mr. Bauer? MEMBER COLLINS: I would like to ask a question while Mr. Bauer is standing there and where -on this topic, because I guess, I guess the questions that largely occur .to me are echoed here about sought of physically, how it'll work, how will the traffic move, because that has implications for how it'll appease the neighbor and so forth? When you first started to describe it Mr. Bauer, you said, well now the customers will come in from the highway and I think you said, and they would park and go to the retail operation. and ,then proceed to the warehouse for.pickup. Now, obviously sought -of broadly speaking, two different kinds of customers. There's me, whenI want something, that would probably,have'to come from the warehouse, but, isn't very big-and.it'll.fit in the back of my station wagon. And, then there's the contractor, who doesn't get your .truck to his site who comes with his own truck. Is that broadly speaking the two kinds of customers that there are? MR. BAUER & MRS. MOORE: Right. MEMBER COLLINS: Obviously, if I - .show up, I'm going to park out near retail and go get somebody to hold my hand while.I,figure out what it is I really need. Will all of the professional customers also park and go talk to someone sought of in the front of the operation before they go and -pick up? MRS. MOORE: Before you answer that. Only because you don't operate. How it's operated in - Riverhead might be. more helpful, because obviously in all fairness to Jeff, I'm kind of putting.him on the spot. This will develop in the ( ) system will be ironed out throughout the system, but I think - MEMBER COLLINS: I understand that, I just like.a concept here. MRS. MOORE: No, that alright. I mean concept. but, I think that if you want Riverhead, I. think that that's gotten tear without the. - MR. BAUER:' A month and a half. MRS. MOORE: A month, and a half, OK. little bit. if you feel comfortable 4with a to hear how it's handled in at least :•a month's wear and Who would like to describe a 63- Page - Hear -:may Transcripts March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals MR. EDGAR GOODALE: What do we want to know.? BOARD SECRETARY KOWALSKI: I need to know'his name again, please. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER.: That's Edgar Goodale. Edgar could you just explain in a very mild brief sense, how the person must go to the retail portion of the building to get the yellow slip for the articles they must pick up in the back? You know, I mean, very rarely is anyone ever going to go right .directly into the storage .warehouse without having their pickup slip;. -right? MR. EDGAR GOODALE: Quite the contrary.that's not particularly true. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: That's not particularly true. 'OK,', would you clear that up then for us? Lora listen to this. MRS. MOORE: Two.examples. One is a contractor and one is I'm coming in to buy a - MR. EDGAR GOODALE: Pat Moore comes, in and she'll come in to the front, she'll come into,the front retail area, and she'll come and talk to somebody and we'll give her a, she'll pick out what ever- she r. wants in the store, and then, -by chance, she.may want a,•she was told to pick up one 'piece of molding. So she wants ':to go through to get that. We will give her'a ticket, she will then drive around the building, go through on the east side _of the building, stop where the molding is, get it, go out. The other part is, is when a contractor or "whomever comes in *and is familiar with the operation, knows what he wants; knows that it's -not in the store, he just wants to go pick up that piece .of molding. He can go directly into the.building, get that, get billed out on the way out.and be on his way and never enter the retail store. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: So there's no reason to go, into the retail store then. MR'. EDGAR GOODALE: Exactly. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER:'.- And that's the way it's working in 'Riverhead right now? MR. EDGAR GOODALE: Right and so far it's only a month and a half old for any of ( - ) , between 40 - 50% of the...people do not go into the retail store. MEMBER COLLINS: Right.- Thank.•you. That is precisely the question I was'asking, and the reason why I,was asking"it, is because parking is certainly a relevant question in these things and the footnote on the site .plan states with respect,to the number of parking places that they translated it says, there are fewer than might be required on a scheduled basis, partly -because some of- our customers are never going to park: That, that,'s howl it .translate and I wanted to hear that from you. That some of your customers are never.going to.park. They are going to arrive, drive through and go away? 64- Page - Hears—, Transcripts March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals MR. EDGAR GOODALE: Correct.. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: So the same access that you have in the retail store for the aspect of charging this to a particular customer, or, a cash sale, can exist at what you referred -to as the checkout booth. MR. EDGAR GOODALE: Correct. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER': Alright. So they can either pay cash or have their account credited and so on and so forth. Alright, that's good. MRS. MOORE: So I think I've addressed the element of that the benefits sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method feasible by the applicant to pursue. Again, you now are familiar with the operation of the building and how the drive through, the loading all works in trendily within this building. Again, that's why the width is what it is: Whether or not the area variance is substantial,' is a question that certainly you will consider. But, we have to balance the, use the balancing test that weighs in favor of the grant of this variance. If in particular, I mean this is why I get so frustrated with the 60 foot rule, because to start with, if you ask Planning, where did you come up with 60 feet? And, they will unabashedly admit, well we just kind of pulled it out from the air. You know; it really makes, it's not a related to any particular thought process. They really just use 60 feet and I think on a three acre parcel or a what the Zoning Code requires, marginally makes some sense. I won't even say .it makes sense, but, marginally there's some justification. On a five acre parcel it makes absolutely no sense. If we were to take out the 60 foot rule, there would be the setbacks that would be required and we could have, I mean maybe there's a reason to have the width requirement, because we could have as much as 265 feet in width. That would not, certainly not be the case here. But, if you, if you look at LIO and the users, and the industrial users, that are considered there. If you were in the business of designing luxury yachts, for some reason, and your clientele buys steamship liners, I mean this is the kind of ship that they would design. LIO is where you would -send them. The zoning is the appropriate zoning. And, the building has to make sense, and the width -of the building has to 'make sense in .light of the use. So, the 60 foot rule I think eventually may be reconsidered and I think in a certain way they were trying to draft something that mitigated the 60 foot rule because it talked about, again, if you were dealing with stripped development you would have Paragraph C that talked about, separate structures and that no single structures have to have more than"60 feet, ( ) that if you were setback with multiple structures ..you go back to 75 feet. So, -there was some thought. -.process about, OK, you're goingto stagger, if you had a strip development, which is I think what they were trying to address, not very well here, but, that was •the attempt, you would push back to -75 feet or so. Again, we're back.to 100 feet and 60 width doesn't make sense. The variance will have no adverse affect or impact on the physical and environmental conditions of the neighborhood .or district. That has already been determined through the change of zone process and the SEQUA process. The alleged difficulty was not self created.. If 65- Page - Hear -..,4 Transcripts March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals anything, they made,',tney,-were abundantly cautious by purchasing the adjacent parcel, being. able -to develope. this parcel. with full buffers, with full screening, .adequate parking. I mean really this is, again; if I had all, my, clients -that were like this, V d have a very easy time before this -Board. With regard to the fence height, it -'s obvious that this is a security fence. There is an existing 6 foot high fence around the existing perimeter of Riverhead Building Supply, and now with the .additional acreage, they'd like to continue that around. • It's obvious that you need to have some security in, the fence height wouldn't be adequate. The code would not be adequate. The various request is minimal variance practical given the personal benefits, anticipated by the applicant. ,This is a state of the art complex. The only other complex of this nature -Is the one in -.Riverhead and I think it's been .described to you how it works... I do, have just the front end of the Riverhead Building Supply site because when we asked the architect, I think it was, we asked the architect to give us the same scale so you would- know, you know, applying the same scale to :our plan as a Riverhead Building Supply site. We could get the entire building within- just a part of Riverhead Building Supply in Riverhead. Again, the site,. Riverhead site is so much .larger than this piece and if any questions come up with regard to comparing the two, you have .a significantly smaller site here which is certainly in proportion with the development of this area and they think with the needs of.this area. I believe that the Planning -Department actually identified it accurately that. most of the clientele that's here, hopefully they will increase the uses, but, it's mostly for this area. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: So what you're saying; is the front of the building in Riverhead is going to be similar to the front of the building?' MRS. MOORE: No, no. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: No, what are you saying? MRS. MOORE: I- wasn't very ( ), I apologize. What we did is, because there might have been some questions on what (someone coughing) comparing Riverhead, I think that maybe one of the neighbors came in to review the file and sent a letter concerned about this development and identifying it with the Riverhead development, particularly the brochure that was -sent out through the mail. I know•.I got it. I know it's important'to your record. (Yes, you got it). That shows - the beautiful. rendering of the Riverhead site and the use of the Riverhead site. .It's going to be just as nice,. but in a much smaller scale and what we did was just compare the two. We asked the architect to give'us the same dimensions, the same scale. OK, the one inch equals 20.- The plans that you have in front of you. When you take -one inch equals. 20, of the Riverhead site, you can fit the entire building in just the showroom area of Riverhead.` So what I wanted you. to do, is to have a comparison of the two that you really can't compare the two. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Alright. 66- Page - Hear -..y Transcripts March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals MRS. MOORE: So you overlap it and you can see that there's a, the Southold, the Greenport site, that's Riverhead, this is, Riverhead. Again to give you, you all notice the area, but, to give you a flavor of the existing conditions. There's a pad here. that has the photographs 'of the site, existing conditions, and where 711 is in relation to the property. So, I'll give that to you. Also submit to the Board, the 711 site plan from the Planning Department's records and the legislative history, .which I quoted to you earlier. I'd be happy to answer any. questions and I have Don Denis here, who, trekked all the way out here. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Are you going to allow us to grill anyone from Riverhead? MRS. MOORE: Whoever you'd like. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: No, no, Edgar? The basic question I have, is really, what brought. the concept of putting everything inside? What caused you to get to that? -I mean and I want to ._preface it by saying, that I know that .since 1985 or thereabouts, the lumber yard in Riverhead had some, a.surprising amount,of their lumber inside and that was 84 lumber, OK. In a much less, you know, a much less stated manner, alright. The doors, there were never any doors on the building. You know, actually it was colder in. that building than it was on the outside most of the time. Not .that I ever frequent it much, but, when I did, it was usually a Sunday afternoon and I couldn't get lumber some place else. But, what caused you to come to that point? Anybody? I mean certainly Mr. Goodale, we know that, you know, that a variety of your lumber has to remain inside. There's no doubt about it. But,. .you know, the green lumber, and everything. What is the purpose of putting everything inside? MR. EDGAR: Besides the obvious of keeping the material even better and out of the ice and rain and snow and shovelling off piles ( ). It's been proven that it's a convenient factor and comfort factor for customers who much rather choose and pick what they want out of the piles as they see fit. The whole idea was actually, I'd like to take credit for it, but, I really can't. ( ) designer who grew up in Maine who was designed, he designed one or two of these throughout the country, and he's the one who actually came and actually sold us on the idea of, well we were going to move anyway. We had designed to put it all in separate buildings, the old fashion way and he kind of talked -us into it, he said, there's a better way of doing it and create a better flow for your. customers. So that's where the idea actually came from. He sold us on that. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER:. In the one month that you've been going on, you know, or month and a half,.the-lumber that has uniquely been outside, what have you seen, have there been any effects of the - MR. GOODALE: Absolutely, much less deterioration of the material and the biggest benefit of that would be during the summertime when you start to get the rain and then the sun beating down on it. That's the worst damage there is to material and the wintertime not as much, 67- Page - Heari,,_Kj Transcripts March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals or be it, you don't have. to shovel snow off of it, but there is much less. We're discovering much less damage, much less waste doing it in this particular fashion. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Alright. And, the other thing is, do your insurance carriers .require you to -put the more toxic lumber in one specific spot, -or, anything of that nature? Are they asking you to isolate that for a particular reason? MR. GOODALE: No. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: No, so that CCA is all put in a, in the same general area along -with all the other - ` MR. GOODALE:. Yes, because basically CCA is not toxic substance. That a CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: No, I didn't mean, I -meant when it burns. Well to some degree.,.. Whatever they put in it now. They usually put arsonic in it, and they're not doing it anymore, whatever they're doing. I'm sure plastic is more toxic than that is, if it was to burn. MR. GOODALE: No, they have no restrictions on what materials.should go where., We don't have flammable,' you know, combustible type of materials. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Right. Lydia you have a question? MEMBER TORTORA: Yes.. I see on your -buffer zones, you're proposing a 4 foot.buffer zone in the side and the rear? MR. GOODALE: 4 foot? MEMBER TORTORA: That's what it says on the site: MRS. MOORE: No 30, 30 foot? MEMBER TORTORA: That's to the residential zone. It says perimeters of landscape buffer front yard 25, side and rear 4 feet. MRS. MOORE: Yes, that's the bus yard. Commercial. MEMBER TORTORA: Yes and what would be like on the east side? What would be within that 37 feet to the parking area? You see what I'm saying? All the little cccs are. MRS. MOORE: There are a lot of cedar trees on site. MEMBER. TORTORA: In other words, there's 4 feet of buffering proposed and I'm not sure what's in the area on the western and the eastern to the parking area. MRS. MOORE: I'm sorry, I couldn't hear you. Which side are you talking about? 68- Page - Hearing Transcripts March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals MEMBER TORTORA: On the west and on, the east. On the west side, there's 37 feet, it's either 37 feet to where the parking lot is. MRS. MOORE: Yes, I see, cccs. MEMBER TORTORA: I'm tried to figure out what's in there. Is that concrete? Is it crushed stone? Is it landscaping? What is it? MRS. MOORE: No, no. MR. GOODALE: That's green. MRS. MOORE: That's green.- You start the curb and the blacktopping. That's the asphalt paving. The 37 feet is actually grass and growth. MR. GOODALE: That's, that new lawn area right before,that. It's all new lawn in that area. MRS. MOORE: Yes, right. So, you're actually going -to have 37 feet even on the commercial side. MR. GOODALE: New lawn on the east side also. MEMBER VORTORA: Yes, that's why I was a little confused because it said 4 feet of buffer, see Pat? Under landscaping. MEMBER COLLINS: Oh, you mean in the notes to'the drawing. MRS. MOORE: Oh, in the notes. -Landscape buffer perimeter side and rear 4 feet. Any reason? Mit. GOODALE: I don't know the explanation. MRS. MOORE: Well I mean, we can answer it later. It looks like a - MEMBER TORTORA: It looks like 37 feet. MRS. MOORE: Yes. MEMBER TORTORA: But the note say, 4 feet. MRS. MOORE: I think - MR. GOODALE: It's clear 4 foot. MRS.-MOORE: No, no, I see what it is. Landscape buffer, these are I think the code requirements. ' Front yard 25, perimeter side rear 4 and buffer for residential zone 30. That's what the code requires if I'm remembering it correctly.- What we're actually providing is what's on the site plan. OK? MEMBER TORTORA: Yes. 69- Page - Hear -L,.,4 Transcripts March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: .,We thank you again Mr. Goodale. Alright, we'll start with Mr. Dinizio, questions? MEMBER DINIZIO: Yes, I have a few. Since you -started -in Riverhead, have you seen an_increase in business? You know over a month? MR. GOODALE: Yes. MEMBER DINIZIO: I mean it's better, it's not the same, right. So, I guess Jeff will probably answer this question better. On your busiest day, I mean, I see you have what, 12 parking spaces now, if that. You got three where everybody wants to, go, and then you have on the other side, where you could park. So, say -you had 12 spaces, can you recall anytime when they've ever been full? MR. BAUER: Oh, yeah. MEMBER DINIZIO: And then, where do they park? CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Jeff, can you come up and use the mike? MRS. MOORE: Mr. Smith can'provide some of the details. MR..SMITH: In anticipation of -the' issue. I. had the ticket sales, trip tickets analyzed for the Greenport yard and on an average, it is about 102,trips per day for each business day and that ranges in the winter season, 70 trips in to a high 125. MRS. MOORE: Does that answer your question? MEMBER DINIZIO: Not really, no: I mean I understand you do a lot of business. But, are those people coming into the counter, or, are those people, you Know are you selling from the trucks? You know, what is that - MRS. MOORE: Counter, counter. MR. SMITH: That's counter. MRS. MOORE: Counter, yes, that's counter sales, yes. MEMBER DINIZIO: That's counter., So', lets say you have 100 cars going in and out that same day. That'd be a fair statement? MR. SMITH: Correct. MEMBER DINIZIO: Is that pretty much spread out during the course of the day, or, is it,a busy time of day? MR. SMITH: There's busy times of the day, Jim. There's between 7 and 9 in the morning and then you get .another load in the afternoon about between 1 and 2. 70- Page - Hear. _ Transcripts March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals MEMBER D,INIZIO: So, say about 50% of your business is within' that and the rest of it's people coming and going' -as a, - MR. SMITH: Yes. MEMBER DINIZIO: Well lets say 100 cars during the course of the day. You have 14 spaces. I can't recall anybody ever stacking up there, having to park in Browns, or, you know, just with the minimal amount of parking you have.now. I mean if your saying to us, that,you're not going to have an increase in business, or, even if it's a 50% more, I'm thinking your parking is going to be more, much more than adequate when you, have this new building. I mean is that a fair statement? MRS. MOORE: That's presently proposed. MEMBER DINIZIO: Right. That's a pretty fair statement? MRS. MOORE.: Yes. MEMBER DINIZIO: And that you're going to be, not only .are you encouraging people to come in, but, more times than not, the people that would have to come in now, would ask you for the wood, and then go .back to_ their, truck and. - then go back to the.yard and get it. They're not going to do that any longer. They're going to right into -the building, get what ,they want and leave. So, they're not even going to get any part of that? MRS. MOORE: Right. MEMBER DINIZIO: But; 100 tickets that Mr. Smith had just stated, is that fair, is that a fair statement? CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: For the record, that was Allen Smith that spoke prior to Jeff. MEMBER DINIZIO: So we're looking at a reduction. I think we're looking at a reduction in traffic, parking in this area. I mean, is that fair? MRS. MOORE: I think a better flow of parking than a reduction per se., I mean, what's presently offered on, site is, at times inadequate. You know, I know I've been there and it's been kind of tight. This meets the code. In fact, you know again, they're addressing most of the retail use to be sure that you know, I can go in there with my kids in the Van and stuff and go in there comfortably. People who are there -all the time will know how to avoid going into the retail. So, when they designed these buildings I think it's fair to say, that your experts really kind of advise you and parking as well, is that true? MR. SMITH: ( ) 71- Page - HearL__4 Transcripts March 23, 1998 -Board 'of Appeals MRS. MOORE: So that this concept, 'and Mr. Goodale mentioned the gentleman from Maine, that when they designed -this building, they also think about the specific use. So, the 'parking, we hesitate to reduce the parking in anyway particularly for the retail. We really don't think it's necessary to increase the parking because you really don't want to see a parking. And, in fact, when Planning reviewed it, they really had no recommendation to increase the parking. Bob Kassner had reviewed it, and .seemed to think, that -the parking was adequate. You have to give some credence to the professionals that know, the operation of the business and listen to them.' In fact, in Riverhead, I think that the code requires:- one set of parking and you actually. -increased it. Is that correct? For retail.. MR. SMITH: Correct, that's right. MRS. MOORE:. So, when it came to retail, at least in Riverhead, they said, well we know the code requires X but -we think that we'll need more and provided more. Here, they're saying, well the code says, we need, well because of the storage needs that large number 91 whatever the. number was, and that's clearly too much parking. You'd end up with a sea of parking when in fact it could be a green area. MEMBER DINIZIO: Well, that's what I was trying to reinforce and also you know, the fact that less cars will be parking and asking questions and more cars will you know, be going through this building and, as far..as I can tell, it's not, like it will be drawing new customers. It's not as though people are going to come -that don't already come. MRS. MOORE: Yes_, that's been the experience. MEMBER DINIZIO: Now, your employee parking is going to be in the same area? MRS. MOORE: No, the employee parking is 'actually on the side. ( ) this side. MR.. SMITH: "On the side, yes. ; MRS. MOORE: Right. 'On the easterly side is an area of 11 parking spaces. MEMBER DINIZIO: Are.you going to,increase the amount of employees as it's taking more people to run the business is'more? MR. RUSSELL GOODELL: Yes, hopefully. MEMBER DINIZIO: 50%? I'.m,just looking for a - MR. RUSSELL GOODELL: We have 15 now. MRS: MOORE: I think that what was said, is that they have 15 employees .now. If all goes well, certainly they., will increase the employment.. They will employ additional people. And as I stated 72- Page - Heari-rny, Transcripts March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals before, there is a significant amount of land here, that if they were to need additional parking for employees, there's room for it. Could it be land bank now? Yes, but it's really not necessary at this stage. MEMBER DINIZIO: Could you tell me what was it zoned before that? MRS. MOORE: Hamlet HD. MEMBER COLLINS: Hamlet Density Residential. MRS. MOORE: Hamlet Density. It had actually approved site plan for multi family in a condominium. MEMBER DINIZIO: Then in the back is the railroad tracks? MRS. MOORE: Correct. MEMBER DINIZIO: That's all I have. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Ms. Collins? MEMBER COLLINS: I'm not sure to whom the question goes, maybe the architect. MRS. MOORE. Oh, good, because the architect has importance. MEMBER COLLINS: I just want to explore a little bit further the rational and the basis for the 115 foot (train whistle,) (LIRR lives),. the rational for the 115 foot width and I have not ( ) on inside the Riverhead facility, but, like everyone else on the North Fork, I got the brochure, and obviously this is a schematic drawing. This is clearly not a drawing to scale in the Riverhead facility. But, what it suggests is, that on each of .the lanes going through, there really are three lanes. One is a traffic lane and adjacent to it on each side, are lanes where the customer's truck is going to stop while he does his dealing with the inventory. Talks to the staff and loads up the materials. So, on the site, on the drawing of the Greenport building, what you show is, one arrow going south from the entrance and then another arrow coming north from down by the railroad end of the building. And, I'm assuming that each of those arrows really represents a three lane traffic lane. One for actually moving the .vehicles, and the other two for loading from the shelves and bunkers on each side. And, I guess where all of this is leading me is, of the whole 115 foot width, how much of that width is for moving the customers' vehicles through the building, and giving the customers' vehicles a space where they can stop and load up, and how much of that width is for,the lumber? MR. DENIS: My name is Don Denis, Architect. Let me explain that the width of the building was arrived at by the consultant that Mr. Goodale talked about. I can give you these dimensions but as I understand it, the aisles are wide enough to have vehicles parked left and right and a vehicle to pass in the middle. 73- Page - Hear, Transcripts March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals MEMBER COLLINS: That's what I thought, yes was described, right. MR. DENIS: I think you're right about that. And.then the' storage, there's storage on the outside planks of the building and also down through the center. So, he's arrived at these dimensions and I think he's done it through. experience and the dimensions of the driving aisle down the center is 30 feet from both cases and then the bin storage seems to be about 28 feet on either side. .The storage in the center of approximately ten feet., MEMBER COLLINS: I think we already passed 115. Mrs. Moore and Mr. Denis adding up footage. MEMBER COLLINS:. 30 and 30 is 60 and.2 x 28 is 56 -and, that's 116. MR.,DENIS: Well, you're getting me on a foot? MEMBER COLLINS: Oh, no, I'm sorry. Understand, that this is definitely not a, I'm not trying to pin anything on anybody. I really just am trying to get a grasp of why the building is 115 feet? MR. DENIS: Yeah, that's, that's -how it was arrived at. I mean, I don't have a working knowledge of a lumber yard storage business. But, I do'know, that we did consult with him as a consultant and this is the dimension we arrived at., I believe he actually wanted it wider and he brought .the dimensions in and said, this is the least that they could do and have the building work as they wanted it to work and that's how we arrived at that. But, I do remember it was wider and I 'can't tell you how much wider it was. Since this - is Southold, we made it narrow. I do want to say one other thing while I'm here about the entrances. That has been approved by the State Transportation Department. So, that's been all. approved and so has the sanitary system. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Thank you. George? MEMBER HORNING:- My colleagues has asked the questions that I question myself. But.again, you're telling us that there's a dual of dance here. One for the. customer, one for the business with having this drive through facility where all the materials are stored inside? Is that correct? There's an advantage to the business and to businesses' customers? - MRS. MOORE: 'Oh, sure, yes. ,.You know between.,the preservation of the materials as well as just customer services, that's - MEMBER HORNING: And you could not provide this ,type of a situation with a conventional building, 60 feet wide? Is that correct? -MRS. MOORE:._.Correct, absolutely, that's right. MEMBER HORNING: Thank you. 74- Page - Hearing Transcripts March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Alright. Pat, unless you have more we're going to ask anybody else that wants to speak. Ilm going to tell you that we're going to knock off hearing at approximately 20 minutes: MRS. MOORE: I do want to address one point that was made through correspondence. I got a copy of it. A recommendation by the Planning Department to increase the setback by 10 feet. Bob Kassner is on vacation right now so I don't have an opportunity to discuss it with him. But, as I mentioned at the beginning of this presentation, 100 feet is actually greater than what the code would allow. The retail parking is very important for the retail for this use and I mean if you look at the site plan for 711 which I submitted to you, the parking layout of the front is very similar without the extra vegetation. We are certainly increasing the amount of green space and buffer. But, the layout is very similar. So, if you look at 711 which is a pure retail facility, you can see that this is a standard layout for retail parking. I would ask the Board to consider solely the 60 foot criteria and the fact that we are 100 feet and that we have 711, at 40 something and Sunrise which is also at 42. So, on average you have a 40_ foot setback on both sides: You keep pushing this building back nobody is going to see it. That doesn't make any sense either. But, the building has been located again, 100 feet to recalculate` all the drainage and everything over a 10 foot setback, it really doesn't make sense. And, to eliminate any .parking for the retail, again, would be a significant impact on the retail operation of this building. I would ask again, the Board to consider and concentrate on the 60 foot which I think we've adequately addressed the need for the 115 foot width of the building and the fact that you've got a 5.7 acre parcel and.not deal with the site plan. Let us address site plan issues with the Planning Department rather .than with you. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Alright, at the culmination of this hearing, just see if you have any objection to this. I want to close the oral testimony again and just very simply close it as a matter of fact on April 16. I just want to tour' the'Riverhead Building and if I have any particular questions I'll raise them. MRS. MOORE: You can ask and I'll be able to submit it to them, right? CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Yes, we'll raise it and you could respond in writing and then we'll circulate to anybody, if we have to. Thank you very much from the Goodale family, and so on and so forth, both co -counsels and Jeff. Is there anybody else would like to speak in favor of this project? Could you just state your name for the record, Sir? MR. DZENKOWSKI: My name is Kim Dzenkowski. I'm a licensed contractor. You asked a bunch of questions here. You almost further had me asking me what you're questions are. I deal with it from both ends. I buy stuff for my own house, I buy for the customers. I'm not like Chad Orlowski, I don't build new houses. I just do repairs. Everything they've said here, is 100% accurate. You just need to go, down there on a Saturday morning and try to find a place 75- Page - Hear:. -,4 Transcripts March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals.-. to park, or go.down there in the winter time when it hasn't snowed in three weeks and you use a sledge hammer to get the lumber apart. Summertime, -everything is stocked on top of those stacks, is just twisted and bent. It's not only lost internal for them, it's pick outs for me and it's more for my customers. I have very little delivery, my work is mostly top end stuff, everything is hand picked. This is just a huge asset down there. Traffic will be much better, the facilities will be much better, and the - lumber will be much better. As, far as extra, I mean they'd love to see that 40 parking lot built. They'd love it. It's never going to happen. Therejust isn',.t- enough people -in Southold Town and nobody else is .going to come in here and just to drive all, the way to Greenport to buy it. CHAIRMAN. GOEHRINGER: . Thank you. Anybody else. Would anybody like to speak against the.project? Sir? MR. MAZZONE: How do you do: My name is Jeff Mazzone. .What about the increased traffic in that area? I mean has there been a traffic studied? CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Do you want to reflect on that Pat? . MRS. MOORE:.,A MR. MAZZONE: Excuse me one second. But, usually I go camping at one of the,camps down Moore's Lane. I mean there's a lot of traffic there, hen going to the, ferry, 711 is right there, there's going to be a lot more traffic. More bigger trucks. You're going to have more truck, right? CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: I assume your asking us that question or are you just posing the question?. MR. MAZ'ZONE:.:,I,'m posing the question. I mean, thinking,out loud. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER:.'. Alright. Do you want to respond to it Allen? MR. SMITH: For the record,, my name is Aleen Smith. I'm general counsel .to Riverhead Building Supply, As I stated earlier I've had the tickets, the' trip tickets sampled and I stated earlier to Mr. DinizioIs question that the tickets. show an average of .approximately 10.2 trips. The environmental determinations. have been made earlier in this process and if the gentleman were truly interested- in the issue I would imagine he would of arrived at. that particular time and asked the question. But,, that being .said and having put the actual factual number'. of trips, in the record, I would point out that .the .standard is established by the, it's called Standard 812 for Trip Generations, additional- manual.- I have a letter for you on this and it lis gaged in two particular letters for the 15, employees they have at this particul-ar site and -I have the standard citation here for you. You would see approximately 20.0 trips that is consistent with the actual and if ,you use the floor area of the retail, which is the 76- Page - Hear:...., Transcripts March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals. other standard, you would show 150 trips and those are the two standard that ( ) of record for this -type of work and certainly that has been proposed to you is consistent with -those statements. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Alright. MR. MAZZONE: Now he's talking, excuse me, he's talking about what normally"occurs in Greenport,, at the lumber yard, right? - CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: I -'m assumi•rig that's what he's talking about. I haven't had a chance to review it. What I'want to do is give you the benefit of reviewing it, alright, and commenting on it. So, you're .welcome to do that. This is the only copy we have. We're going to -,copy it for you tomorrow, we'll give it to you and we.,'ll let you respond to it. MR. MAZZONE: I just wanted to see what .they did in Riverhead. I mean, a new place, why would you build a new place if you think you're going to have the same people come in? I mean, wouldn't you upscale for more people? CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Well, that was the purpose of my question, why put everything under cover? Basically the same -situation and I. assume I'm not answering the question for you, but, I assume that they are telling us that they have much less waste and people appear to enjoy this option as Mr. Dzenkowski said. MR. MAZZONE: Thank you. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Anybody else like to speak against? MR. RUTKOWSKI: ANTHONY RUTKOWSKI. One thing I was thinking about. How about liability? Someone goes in there. I go in and go to the retail store and buy a couple. of saws or whatever and I 'go out and get my lumber. Suppose I'm standing there and the forklift happens to swirl with my foot, or you something falls. and'lets say I break my -arm. Is there some kind of release or are there signs in the building stating that you know, the customer is at his own risk? Is that ever going to be mentioned? CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: I haven't had a chance to tour. the Riverhead facility to -see that. But, will have - MR. MAZZONE: I'believe that in the zoning, the 60 foot rule, I think they also mention that was suppose to be related to traffic flow and the amount of traffic going in and -out. of these so-called future strip malls. So maybe 'they had that traffic study was related to that'. And also, one other point was, since they're going to have this facility, which they say.is like a golf ball to a basket ball, I think she meant, that 711 is the golf ball and this is the basket. ball. - 77- Page - Hear,.ig Transcripts March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals MR. SMITH: No, that isn't what we meant. I believe the gentleman raised judicial strip mall and my guess is what he's referring to is Home Depot and what Home Depot might mean.for us on the North Fork and like trying,to compare Home Depot and what Home Depot might mean to all of us to this. particular project. And, there is no comparison. Under the very same standards of traffic generation, if you look at the stamp for that type of a retail center, and you look at the total square feet- per se, a, Home Depot at 100,000 sq. ft., you're looking at more trips in a peak out in and out. of 100,000 sq. ft. Home Depot center, than you are at this facility in a day. That's the comparison. That's why that. is an issue when you talk about Route 58, Riverhead, where Home Depot is proposed.. It is entirely different traffic stamp and with reference to libel, Riverhead Supply is .insured, it is well insured, their insurance underwriters reviewed this facility that's, being proposed and their new facility in, Riverhead and make -recommendations further the­subj-ect to the State Farm Building Codes and their regulated by OSHA. So, there's plenty of insurance.and we try to avoid any accidents because it's costly to the operation. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Has there been any incidents in the new building that -you know? ..(Unidentified gentleman). In the new building? CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Yes. (Unidentified gentleman)- No. MR. SMITH: No incidents in the new building. CHAIRMAN.GOEHRINGER:. Again for the record, that was both- Allen Smith as co -counsel and Edgar Goodale. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Anybody else like to speak against? Alright. MR:-. CORRAZINI: My name -is Rich Corrazini and the only question I have is about the square footage of.the building.. How big is the one in Riverhead? MR.-DENIS: 125,000 sq. ft. MR. CORRAZINI: .125,000 and this building is how big? MR. DENIS: 50,000. MR.-CORRZINI: 50.,000; OK. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER:- Excuse, me one second, Rich. Again for the record, so I don't get yelled .,at, that was Donald Denis, answered both of .those questions. This is from the Hay Harbor situation, OK.` 78- Page - HearilLy Transcripts March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals BOARD SECRETARY KOWALSKI: That was Donald Denis that answered this? I thought Allen Smith answered that. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Was it Allen Smith? No, it was Donald Denis. BOARD SECRETARY KOWALSKI: Oh it was, you fooled me that time. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Excuse me Rich, I apologize. MR. CORRAZINI: My only thing ,is for Greenport. It just seems like that- building is overkill, or is much more than is. needed for the amount of people that's going in and out of there. You know, I don't know, it's not golf ball, basket ball, it's more like baseball, softball. You know, it's like half the size of the building in Riverhead and 'the building in Riverhead is huge. It's a big _building. That's all I have to say. CHAIRMAN GOFHRINGER: Thank you. Yes, Mr. Italia. MR. ITALIA: My name is Zito Italia. I think the- issue is the traffic. I mean there's a tremendous amount, of traffic flowing through Greenport there. The entrances and exits are right on the main road. The bottlenecking through that area is going to be tremendous. You're going to have westbound traffic, people trying to, get out of this plaza or the lumber yard to go westbound, pulling in front of eastbound traffic, fully loaded with plywood, lumber, it. is an issue and we should look at it. Also, prior to handing out anymore permits in this town, to various construction projects and additions, there are some vacant facilities right here on .the main road, in Southold Town. They have tumbleweed blown around from east to west, not being utilized. But, we're going to give out a permit for additional 52 or 53,000 sq. ft.. That's something that should be looked -at too. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: I just want to reflection your traffic issue, OK. What Mr. Smith was alluding to and I'm not speaking for him, was that the Planning Board did look at the entire SEQUA issue, which is the State and environmental issue, OK and you might want .to run, I don't mean physically run but I mean you may want to go down to the Planning Board and look at that LAF, which is long environmental assessment form and if you have any specific questions after you review it, you know, we can readdress those issues or address those issues at the next hearing if you have a concern. Honestly, I mean, you know we'd like you to look at them. MR. ITALIA: No, I appreciate that. But, also, we're putting up buffer building. Here we are we're gearing towards tourism, vineyards, we're trying to make the North Fork of Long Island different than other areas. .I mean somebody brought up an issue of what's going on in Riverhead. 'I don't care about Riverhead. I pay taxes right here in Southold Town. I moved here from Howard Beach, Queens. I stopped in' G1en.Cove for a little bit, New Hyde Park. I moved out here 11 years ago. I've been paying taxes out here for 11 years. I do not want the North Fork of Long Island to become like 79- Page - Hear.g Transcripts March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals Howard- Beach, -Queens,, or Glen Cove. This.:. is no,t what I want out here and it's something that all of us live out here. for the same thing. We have a hard' enough time going to a, going to Greenport just for the Firehouse, the carnivals that they have. I mean the traffic is just unbearable, even during the week. You try to go to for lunch out there. You can't get up and down the main road. I.mean you're saying that there.'s not a traffic issue. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: No, I'm not saying that. I'm saying that that issue was an issue that was briefly before the Planning Board, because they did the SEQUA review on this project. That's what I'm saying. MR. ITALIA: Also, meanwhile -we're- focusing towards, tourism and putting up all of these. beautiful places, vineyards and everybody's putting up. these beautiful halls and we have all these people coming out here to spend money. .We're also going to 115 foot of the main road, we're going to put up a butler building there. Everybodys .going to be looking at .a butler building. I mean what I do for a living is a construction is my main thing but, unfortunately I hate to be a hypocrite. I do not want it in my, back yard. I don' t care what goes on in Riverhead, but not in Southold Town. I am totally against anything going .on out here. The reason,why people.moved out here is, I mean we had people horsing around with horse farms earlier tonight. I. agree with that gentleman. I mean we came out here to live in the country and live out here to enjoy the country. We don't need another 5.0,000 sq. ft. building. I It is an overkill. It's an overkill. I mean if I need a piece of lumber that bad, I mean and I can get my car ,and drive to Riverhead, whether it's Riverhead Building Supply or Pergament, or Penny -Lumber. I mean why do we need that out there? He built a beautiful Taj Mahal in Riverhead and I think it's a beautiful place and it belongs in Riverhead. It does not belong in Southold Town. Thank you for your time. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Thank you. Anybody else. Any questions from the Board? Further Questions? MEMBER TORTORA: I just would like to ,say something in -reference to a, I just wanted to say in reference to .your comments about, the Planning,Board's.concerns about parking. We have a copy of the memo. You're asking you know, whether the code is.. right or not, that it is not up to this Board to make that determination as you know. The variance is a 100% request. The building is 525 feet.long, it's a 115 feet .wide, it is big for our little town. It's not my, you know, this Board's place to pass judgment on whether .you're going ,to be successful or not be successful, whether we like it or not, our refuse is clearly the variance. To that end, to offset the magnitude of- the 115 feet, I personally would like to,see a greater buffering area in the front. I'm not asking.,you to move the building, but, 25 feet of buffering for 150 foot width is. not going to, is not (coughing), that's my. question,, opinion, and a, you call it an exchange, or can call it a swap', whatever you want, but, those are my thoughts. I'm not saying. to, you know, rearrange -you're building, how you do that, is something else, but, I personally would like to 80- Page Hearing Transcripts March'23, 1998 -Board of Appeals see, more buffering up there to offset the magnitude of the width request that you're asking for. That's what I like to put on the record. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Alright, where do we go from there Mrs. Moore then? Do we recess without a date? Do we recess with a date? Do you go back to the Planning Board in reference to the 10 feet that you're talking about and then the additional request from Mrs. Tortora? . I'm posing several options here. What I'm suggesting is, we recess 'without a date, you're going back to the Planning Board anyway to discuss with them the 10 feet that. they're requesting in reference to the placement of the building, or not? You're not giving it the 10 feet? MRS. MOORE: I'd like to discuss it with, well certainly we can discuss it with you. If we're talking about an. additional 10 feet for buffer, what I'm suggesting to you is, that the code,. the intent of the legislation I think I put it on the record. You know your own views as we are with 20 feet, you are increasing the buffer, it's greater -increase'-in buffer, �than any other parcel 'in this area including the new Sunrise Coach.` You're asking for Riverhead Building Supply to provide not only what they're providing which is more than what the code requires, but, much more - MEMBER TORTORA: 25 in the front? I'm talking about the front part. MRS. MOORE: Yes, I'm looking at the front. MEMBER TORTORA: -I'm talking about the front and the others have been there for a long time'. This, is a' brand new structure and the others are not 115 feet wide. MRS. MOORE: No, no, no. You have Sunrise Coach which very recently built that building. MEMBER TORTORA: Yes, but it's not 115 feet wide. MRS. MOORE: No I understand that, but, I mean you're talking about a buffer area that if you compare this site to what is presently existing, I understand that they're preexisting and you have a preexisting condition here as well, which they are doing the best that can be done, which is demolish the whole thing and starting over. That's why' I say that the extra buffer, I'm not sure that there's. there's, I'll talk to the clients whether or not they can provide greater buffer. But, if you're saying. push the building back, we're kind of, we're dealing with the retail parking, and if you create a greater buffer,.you're essentially eliminating some very important parking for the retail use. You are not going to want to walk from the side of the building, you and I; you know, as a retail user because that probably what will end 'up. We're not going to want to park on the side -and walk around to the front of. the building. And I know you've heard this over and over from most retail operations, but parking has to be in the front. 81- Page - Heailrig Transcripts March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals MEMBER TORTORA: That's why 'I'm not telling you how to do it.- I'm just saying that is my personal feelings. You know, if you're interested in economy those personal feelings, then, how you do that is another thing. I'm not going to say to you, cut back your building, wipe out your parking, that's not my thing. I'm saying that I think 115 feet by 520 feet long building could benefit greatly by more front, by buffering the front. I don't think that's an unreasonable at all. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Alright, can we do this. Can you at least discuss it with your clients and we'll recess for that date, you'll go to the Planning Board and discuss the issue of the 10 feet that they're requesting. Are they requesting an additional 10 feet? Is that what I understand? MRS. MOORE: Well, yes, I think that were. That came after the fact. I mean -I went to the Planning Board, -.they gave a recommendation and then it came later. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Alright, can we just get those two issues concreted so that we know where we're going with it. If we're going with it at all. Tell us when you want us to put it back on, we'll finish it and get it done. MRS. MOORE: Why don't you schedule it for the April is full, so, right? CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: May 14th. MRS. MOORE: But Bob Kassner is on vacation. He's the guy I have to talk to unfortunately. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Alright, May I'll make a motion recessing until done by that time. MEMBER DINIZIO: Second. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: All in favor? 14th. Hearing no further comment May 14th and we'll have everything Motion carried. See Minutes for resolution. End of hearing. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD 4-U.- SUFFOLK , .r . ig , PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD =State Environmental Quality Review `-= -- - NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notide' of Determination Non -Significant Ck August 11, 1997 Town Hall, 53095 Main P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 1� Fax (516) 765-313E Telephone (516) 765-1 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed site plan for Riverhead Building Supply SCTM#: 100046-1-2.1 Location: Main Rd., Greenport SEAR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: This proposed site plan is for the construction of a 50,425 square foot lumber yard supply building. Page 2 SEQR Negative Declaration -Riverhead Building Supply August 11, 1997 Reasons Supporting This Determination: This project involves the construction of a 50,425 square foot lumber yard supply building. A variance application is before the Board of Appeals for building width. The building width must be approved by the Board of Appeals before site plan approval. A full environmental impact statement Vas reviewed by the town's consultant in conjunction with the zone change application to the Town Board. A lumber yard supply building is a permitted use in this Light Industrial Park/Planned Office Park (LIO), thus the proposed action is consistent with zoning. An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed,. and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. There has not been any correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. The applicant will have to comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) and all relevant standards of water supply and sewage disposal systems. Design and flow specification, subsurface soil conditions and site plan details will have to be approved by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). This, impact is not considered significant due to the anticipated project compliance with established requirements of the SCSC and the SCDHS and the required relevant permits. - For Further Information: . Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner Address:, Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 cc: John P. Cahill, DEC Albany Suffolk County Dept. of Health Suffolk County Water Authority New York State Dept. of Transportation Judith Terry, Town Clerk Suffolk County Dept. of Public Works Southold Town Building Dept. Applicant • s c� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. {� Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD August 12, 1997 Patricia Moore, Esq. P.O. Box 483 Mattituck, NY 11952 �`OSurl•o(�� ` VV OGy� . c� Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa P.O. Box 1179 Southold, {� New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 P. - I1VG CARD OFFICE - ��T SQ_W FSO IT i OLD �,�,I'I 6 Re: Proposed site plan for Riverhead Building Supply SCTM# 1000-46-1-2.1 Dear Ms. Moore: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, August 11, 1997: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency makes a determination of non -significance, and grants a Negative Declaration. - Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman enc. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman James Dinizio, Jr. Lydia A. Tortora Lora S. Collins George Homing MEMORANDUM BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Planning Board FROM: G. Goehringer, ZBA DATE: March 4, 1998 SUBJECT: Riverhead Building Chairman Supply Project Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ZBA Fax (516) 765-9064 Telephone (516) 765-1809 We have received inquiries with regard to Route 25 in the area of the above project, Moore's Lane, 7-11, and other business/industrial uses, and whether or not information was requested about the frequency of trailer trucks entering, exiting, loading and unloading as well as other vehicles. Attorney Patricia Moore, as agent for the applicant, furnished a copy of the SEQRA determination of non -significance for this project today, and there is no . indication whether the traffic issues were addressed . or requested by the Planning Board as lead agency for consideration. The Board of Appeals hearing regarding the building width and fence height ' will be held on March 23, 1998. We would like to provide the Planning Board with an opportunity to furnish comments to us under the site plan pending for a 115 ft. wide building and 8 -ft. fence height. Also, please furnish reasons supporting your comments (or site plan preference) with respect to these site planning, considerations, and with respect to the paragraph above. Thank you. r' ,1% PATRICIA C. MOORE Attomey at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Southold Town Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Att: Ms. Linda Kowalski Dear Linda: Tel: (516) 765-4330 Fax: (516) 765-4643 1 JUN 21998 1, IBJ June 1, 1998 RE: Riverhead Building Supply Corp. Application Hearing Date: June 11, 1998 Enclosed please find completed Affidavit of Mailing with postmarked receipts from the post office for the above referenced matter. The return receipt cards will be forwarded to you upon our receipt of same. Also enclosed is the completed Affidavit of Posting for this matter. Very truly yours, Patricia C. Moore PCM/mr Encls. I r BOARD OF APPEALS : TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -----------------------------------x In the Matter of the Application of Riverhead Building Supply (Name of Applicants) ------------------------------------x COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) I, Patricia C. Moore AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING AND POSTING residin at Terry Lane, Southold New York, being duly sworn, de ose and say 1) the day by certified, mail return attached Le1 Notice, a persons at th addresses the addresses ed below ment rolls of the own of the United States ost return receipt reques ed _ TO and, that: of , 199 I personally mailed, receipt requested, a true copy of the ddressed to , each of the following named set opposite their respective names, that are those shown on the current assess - Southold; that said Notices were mailed at ffice to each name below certified mail, attach post office receipts here): Mailing Address 2),On the 29th day of May, 1998, I personally postgd the subject property identified as District 1000, Section 46 , Block. 1 , Lot' 1 and 2. 1, by placing the Town's official poster ten (10) feet, or closer, from the property line facing the street or facing the right-of-way, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for . seven full days prior to the subject hearing date, which is June 11, 1998. Sworn to before me this (signature) ,� 9 r* day of M * y 199 8 MARGARET C. RUTKOWSKI Notary Public, State of New York NoA982528 Nofary Public Oualifiad in Suffolk County Cor mOssion Expires Juno 3.19_9q **Please return to the office of the Board of Appeals when completed. (Town Hall hours are 8 - 4 p.m.) Thank you. § 58-1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING § 58-1 Chapter 58 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING §58-1. Providing notice of public hearings. [HISTORY: Adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Southold 12-27-1995 as L.L. No. 25-1995. Amendments noted where applicable.] § 58-1. Providing notice of public hearings. Whenever the Code calls for a public hearing, this section shall apply. Upon determining that an application is complete, the board or commission reviewing the same shall fix a time and place for a public hearing thereon. The board or commission reviewing an application shall provide for the giving of notice: A. By causing a notice giving the time, date, place and nature of the hearing to be published in the official newspaper within the period prescribed by law. B. By requiring the applicant to erect the sign provided by the town, which shall be prominently displayed on the premises facing each public or private street which the property involved in the application abuts, giving notice of the application, the nature of the approval sought thereby and the time and place of the public hearing thereon. The sign shall be set back not more than ten (10) feet from the property line. The sign shall be displayed for a period of not less than seven (7) days immediately preceding the date of the public hearing. The applicant or his/her agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision. C. By requiring the applicant to send notice to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street § 58-1 SOUTHOLD CODE § 58-1 from the property included in the application. Such notice shall be made by certified mail, return receipt requested, posted at least seven (7) days prior to the date of the initial public hearing on the application and addressed to the owners at the addressee listed for them on the local assessment roll. The applicant or agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision. r � I BOARD OF APPEALS:TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ..----------------------------------x In the Matter of the Application M Riverhead Building Supply (Name of Applicants) --------------------t=---------------x COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING AND POSTING I, Margaret Rutkowski , residing at Theresa Drive, Mattituck, New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: 1) On the 29th day of May , .199 8, I personally mailed, by certified mail, return receipt r(- ­ ,rested, a true copy of the attached Legal Notice, addressed t(,,, -each of the following named persons at the addresses set opposit �: their respective names, that the addresses listed below are those sli awn on the current assess- ment rolls of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office to each name below certified mail, return receipt requested attach post office receipts here): Name of Surrounding Property Owner Mailing Address Thomas Jurzenia & wf 675 Silvermere Road, P.O. Box 285, Greenport, NY 11944 Philip & Patricia Marcario 2878 N. Wading River Road, Wading River, NY 11792 Joseph Caputo P.O. Box 256, Shoreham, NY 11786 Robert Brown P.O. Box 2050 Greenport NY 11944 Colgate Design Corp c/o Southland Corp, P.O.-Box 711 Dallas. TX 75221-9867 New York Telephone Co 1095 Ave of the -Americas, 38th F1, New York, NY 10036 Anne Marie Nelson c/o The Bank of New York Trust Company of Florida, N.A. 800 Brickell Avenue, Suite 300, Miami, FL 33131 and, 2) y__ On the day of 199' , I personally posted the subject property identified as District 1000, Section , ;t Block Lot by placing the Town's official poster ten (10) feet, or closer, from the property line facing the street or facing the right-of-way, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven full days prior to the subject hearing date, which is 199' . Sworn to before me this 29thda of Ma 199 g NoTary Public **Please return to the office of (Town Hall hours are 8 - 4 p.m.) PATRICK C. MOORE NOW Puft State of New York Suffolk County - Na 481118118 CenMils m E*kn June 111, 99 the Board of Appeals when completed. Thank you. l._ § 58-1 NOTICE ,OF PUBLIC HEARING § 58-1 Chapter 58 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING §58-1. Providing notice of public hearings. (HIS'T'ORY: Adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Southold 12-27=1995 as L.L. No. 25-1995. Amendments noted where applicable.] § 58-1. Providing notice of public hearings. Whenever the Code calls for a public hearing, this section shall apply. Upon determining that an application is complete, the board or commission reviewing the same shall fix a time and place for a public hearing thereon. The board or commission reviewing an application shall provide for the giving of notice: A. By causing a notice giving the time, date, place and nature . of the hearing to be published in the official newspaper within the period prescribed by law. B. By requiring the applicant to erect the sign provided by the town, which shall be prominently displayed on the premises facing each public or private street which the property involved in the application abuts, giving notice of the application, the nature of the approval sought thereby and -the time and place of the public hearing thereon. The sign shall be set back not more than ten (10) feet from the property line. The sign shall be displayed for 'a period of not less than seven (7) days immediately preceding the date of the public hearing. The applicant or his/her agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision. C. By requiring the applicant to send notice to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street § 58-1 SOUTHOLD CODE 1458-1 from the property included in the application. Such notice shall be made by certified mail, return receipt requested, posted at least seven (7) days prior to the date ijs gp�,:�ui olT ,tlievl finial public hearing on the application and fiv 044d"r-94sedrt:ii-""the owners at the addresses listed- Cor them roll. The applicant or agent shall � ,'fit -n' t"O' '( j;eb°"asp"Ni'trid'avit that -s/he has complied with this provision'. NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, concerning this property. DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: 1�qmes - ':J"Umo //' If you have an interest in this project, you are invited to view the Town files) which are available for inspection prior to the day of the hearing during' normal business days between the hours of 3 a.m. and BOARD OF APPEALS •TOWN OF SOUTHOLD e (516) 765-1809 r iJ N 0PCON]TR9CTroN CORP. :D SITE PLAN -10--0- 1; ARCHITECT. JOB, SCALE.I• [0,_O, DRAWING NO. DONALD A. DENI5 SITE LAYOUT: JOB NO,9t01 DATE. 19 JULY lilt SLS f1AIN ROAD D RI BUILDING BUILDING SUPPLY j^'�`�-'�( �(]2j�� j�j� /� Il ll V LL`' 111/111/ 'L�Lr�l u O \Y/ 1.� RI�IIa !LN D o UOLDONQ SUPPLY REV.. f> .J� ,ILJII AOUE8000E, N.Y. AQUEBO MAIN ROAD IRT.76I GREENPORi. NY GREEMPOO Q4 VAARDD L//r'/1'l`\, f6I0177-36II OP PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. f Ro o -5910 17',Ew /= o /� Project Name: f? Ct,,1=/< 14,6 /f D P u//- P//�OL S C4 Requested Action: c--� 6 /,/ S T IC o eODT SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I (>� Unlisted Contact Person: . [� , /</�4 (516) 765-1938 971 )38 Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planni g Board Position: ( ) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) Comments: S P� �� S %^o a C�i v L f� �7� T�/y� 13 4(f �- fi f9 D 1�(,Ekl 5c,,> /V-�, S- S g �W /le'6 OF Gaj-PrllG- Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman -* cc: Board of Appeals Building Department Southold Town Board Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSE) EG-StGpqL�� NYSDEC - Albany ,%ffell .Geunty-DepaFtfneRt-of- bfiGA4e k -s-- ;K- New York State Department of Transportation Thomas Cybulski, Greenport Public Utilities Raymond VanEtten, Greenport Village Administrator Suffolk County Water Authority *Maps are enclosed for your review rev. 4/94 AYA r 617.21 SE'DR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full E,-�F is designed to help acolicants and agencies determine, in an ordedv manner, whether a projec: or action may be significant. The question of .whether an action may be significant is not always e35v to answer. =requent- ly, there are aspects or a projec: that are subjective or unmeasirreablr•_. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knovdedge of the environment or may be :ethnically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware or the broader concerns afrec,;ng the question of significance. The full E,-kF is intended to provide a method .vherebv applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature. yet flexible to allow introduction or information to fit a protect or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a -given project and its site. f5)' identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts ? and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a L r.-_,jr:- r rr• ar-zion. It crcvides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered smail to moderate or •.whether it Is a potentially - large impact. The form also idendries whether an Impact can be mrtiOated or reduced. Part 3: If anv impact in Part 2 is identified as potentiaily-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impac, is ac,ually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted ,actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: C Part 1 _ Part 2 CPart 3 U,..)on review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 -and 3 and 3 if aoorocriate), and any other su-;porting information, and considering both the magitude and importance or each impact. it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in anv large and imoortant impact(s) and, therefore. is one which will not have a;herefore a negative declaration will be prepared. significant impact on the environment. O 8. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures -described in P,�RT 3 have been reouired, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be preRared.' ❑ C. The oroject may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant imoac, on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will lie prepared. ' A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted actions :r Name of Action l) I . RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY SITE PLAN APPLICATIO ,Name or Lead :\I;cncy PLANNING BOARD Print or Type Mame of Respunsrbie Ulf icer :n '_gad Ai -f; ncv Si:;naturc: of RcSocnscifll: Cfficur :n I.I•.:d Title of Rcspon5ibic Cifriccr Slgn.Ilure pl 1'rep,arur0f _4iff,-ren( from reSAUrSIb e 0 1 er) Q ate � `r;F PART 1 --PROSECT INFORMATIrA Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effe,1 on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considereo\ as part of the application for Approval and may be subject to further verification :spd public review. Provide any additional Information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent orlinformation currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If Information requiring such additional work. Is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. +, NAME OF ACTION SITE PLA A. Site Description LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, MunlclpsIlly and County) Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. , SIS ROUTE 25 GREENPORT NEW YORK (suburban) QRural (non-farm) NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR t BUSINESS TELEPHONE RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY CORP. ( 727-3947 ADDRESS 1 . c/o Allen M. Smith Esq. 737 Roanoke Avenue P.O.Box'1240 acres acres CITYfPO i i • t Riverhead, New York 11901 (and) STATS LP CODE NAmc OF Patricia C. '.t ... •� •, Hit I Moore iBUSINESS TELEPHONE Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres 63% Acres :I )298-5629 ADDRESS 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project sites Haven Loam a. Soil drainage: OWell drained inn % of site '•, UModerately wellidrained -- %'of site t halia Road CITYIPO Land Classification System? 0 acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370).' STATE ZIP CODE Mattituck NY 11952 2 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Site plan_ of Riverhead Building Supply= • oto ' fa612•t2.te the expansion- of _ th(­ Building .,Suuply . • , Please Complete Each Question— Indicate N.A. If not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. , 1. Present land use: DUrban Olndustrial , ._ OCommercial • . OResidential (suburban) QRural (non-farm) O.Forest OAgriculture QOther,,- ;,ae,9R, .,oldfield/woodland 2. Total acreage of project area: 3.3 :acres, APPROXIMATE ACREAGE +. •,II �•: ►t PRESENTLY ' AFT_ FMPI ETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 1007 :acres' , 3.�% acres Forested — acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0 acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) 0 acres acres Water Surface Area 0 acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres 63% Acres Other Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project sites Haven Loam a. Soil drainage: OWell drained inn % of site '•, UModerately wellidrained -- %'of site OPoorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land Is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? 0 acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370).' 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings onroject site? ❑Yes qNO a. What is depth.to•bedrockf - (in feet) 2 `5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 00100A _ t.11fj d/° 010.15°rb 015% or greater % % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a 'building, site, or district, listed on the State or the Na Registers of Historic Places? Oyes LINO ; , ,; .i ; ,;, :• , tional 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Oyes ®No 8. What is the depth of the water table? l4 . (in feet)' 9. Is site located over a primary, principal,- or sole source Aqulfef?6Ye3i'. [' "ONo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Oyes BNo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that Is ridentified as threatened or endangered? Oyes Ix-lNO According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on, the project site? (i.e., ' cliffs, dunes, othef' geological formations) OYes QNo Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community'or neighborhood as' an' opert space'or recreation area? Oyes ONO. If. yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be Important to the .community? . Oyes 12No " no 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it Is tributary 16. Lukes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: no. a. Name by—existing b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served public utilities? . Qyes ONO a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? , ? , b) If 'Yes, will Improvements be necessary to allow connection? C]Yes IiNo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified Section 303 and 304? OYes Oklo Pursuant to Agriculture and' Markets Law, Article 25 -AA, 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? OYes ®No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? „OYes , ONO 1 B. Projrnt Description ' 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill In dimensions as appropriate) , a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor ___,initially; b. Project acreage to be developed: - ---�— acres. existing Riverhead --�_ acres initially; 5.7 c. Project acreage to remain acres ultimately. Build. supe . acres.*per site plan•(3;5r%.) d. Length of project, in miles: n/a . (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing * %; ----__; proposed * per site plan g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour — (D Parr (upon completion ofro ect)? P p j ITE � R� Trip h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Manual estim. Initially y Two. Family Multiple Family , Condominium Ultimately L Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? _32-5_ ft. approx. 3 min. N .. !. 2. Flow much natural material (i.e.,4r rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? tons/cubic yank, 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? OYes ONo : -ADN/A \ a. If yes, for what Intend—` purpose is the site being -reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes ON,o c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? l' OYes } ON 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from -site? _ . -9 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally -important vegetation be removed by this' project? , OYes f3N'o 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 12 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi -phased: ,-•• ' a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). ! ; b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1,____month ..year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month _- :.. year. ':! . d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? OYes ONO, 8. Will blasting occur during construction? OYes 30 EINO ' .. 15726 9. Number . of jobs generated: during construction ; after project Is complete J 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 10' 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? []Yes ®No If yes, explain • - I 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes !- . ®No a. If yes, Indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount. _--_ b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? f?Yes 1'No . Type _Priyate-.Septic System 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? -�'TOYes ' 'ONo Explain n/a + • 15. Is project or any portion of project located In a 100,year flood plain?.!:;,'.-,,OYes, it. ONo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? INYes a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons ! ,'•t';':),,. ++ b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be' used?.:E]Yes ONo c. If yes, give name , +, o t -a,- _-_ I 'location ' d. Will any wastes not go Into a sewage disposal system or Into a sanitary landfill? OYes ONo e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? " JYes I)Nol''ti '' '.�•? i.vlr. II a. If yes, what Is the anticipated rate of disposal] demo. de tons/month: !' b. It yes, what is the anticipated site life? _ years, 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? OYes UNO 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? OYes xQNo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels?, i. OYes. bNo , 21. Will project result in an increase In energy use? Oyes. ,pNo ; ,•,� err,. +• . ..• ,, If yes', indicate type(s) Electricity; heating fuel 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day "d gallons/day, 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? OYes bNo if Yes, explain n ,25. Approvals Required: "= Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board IlYes ONo _Southold Town Board' received City, Town, Village Planning Board ffYes DNo Southold Town planning Board City, Town Zoning Board Dyes DNo City, County Health Department V$Yes DNo SyFF-oLV- Coyniry HFA(Ttj p.Efl- sanitary Other Local Agencies DYes DNo Other Regional Agencies DYes DNo State Agencies I�RYes DNo NYS DOT curb cut Federal Agencies DYes DNo C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve'a planning or zoning decision? DYes DNo If Yes, indicate decision required: Moning amendment Dzoning variance Dspecial use permit Dsubdivision site plan Onew/revision of master plan Dresource management plan bother 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? HD 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 25 multifamily units ( previuus approvals on record) 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? LIO S. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? �*+o Riii1dinv Supply building 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? DYes DNo 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/. mile radius of proposed action? Commercial/ Industrial (and residential) 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoin ing/surrounding land uses within a 1/. mile? 13Yes DNo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or .water districts? DYes ®No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community' provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? DYes 9No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? DYes DNo 12. Will the proposed action result In the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Dyes ®No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? DYes DNo - D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which yod propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Spo ame Riverhead Building Supply Dateto l ti y Signature Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coas I Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY CO.. (Re -opened as- per s-per Board Resolution adopted May 19,1998). This is a variance request based upon -the Building Inspector's January 2, 1998 No- tice of Disapproval which reads as follows: "...1) the proposed structure being located in an LIO District is 'permitted to have a maximum of 60 feet of frontage on one street. The -proposed building is approximately 115 ft. facing Rt. 25. Pursuant to Article XIII, Section 100-133C; 2) - When fences are located in or along side and rear yards, they shall 'not exceed 6'/z feet- in height, pursuant to 100-231 B..." Location of Property: 746.10 and 74500 Main Road, Greenport, NY; 1000-46-1-1 and 2.l,com- bined as a single lot. ' - 6:05 p.m. Appl. No. 4568- DOMINICK SEGRETE. This is a variance request under the Zoning Code, Article XXII, Sec- tion 100-239.4B,• based upon the - Building Inspector's April 9, 1998 Notice of Disapproval, dis- approving a building permit ap- plication for an inground pool and deck addition due to`its pro- posed location within 75 feet from the bulkhead, concrete wall, rip rap or similar structure, at 4000 Wunneweta Road, Nassau Point Club Properties, Cutchogue, NY; 1000-111=14= 22.1. 6:10 p.m. Appl.' No. 4569= FRANK KROPF. This is a variance request under Zoning Code Article III, Section 100-33, based upon- the Building Inspector's April 8, 1998 Notice of Disapproval, disapproving a building permit application for an addition which will create a non -conformity in that the exist- ing garage will not be located in the rear yard at 1820 Marlene Lane, Laurel, NY; 1000-1.-4.4-2- ; 33. - 6:15 p.m. Appl. No. 4570 - JOSEPH FRAZZITTA. This, is a variance request under the - Zoning Code, Article XXIII, Section 100-239.413 for permis- sion to construct deck addition with gazebo"at a setback of less than 75 feet from the bulkhead at 1420 InletWay at Cedar Beach, Southold, NY; 1000-92- 1-6. 6:20 p.m. Appl No. 4572 - NICHOLAS METHVAN. This is a variance request under - the Zoning Code, Article XXIV, Section 100-244B, based upon the Building Inspector's April 16, 1998 and April •19,1998 Notices of Disapproval, disapproving a - building permit application for a deck, and addition which -will exceed the allowable, lot cover- age of 20% for this nonconform- ing lot. Location of -Property: 1630 Theresa Drive, Mattituck-, NY;,10007115-14-3;.also known: -"as Lot-6;'DWp. ;Hole'Creek-E5= tates. ` 6:25 p.m Appl. No. 4574-' PREM CHATPAR. This is,a variance request under the Zon-ing Code Article XXIII, Section 1'00-239.4B based upon the Building Inspector's March 10, 1998 and January -6,1997 disap- proving a building permit appli= cation for a proposed (two-story) addition oto dwelling and pro- posed accessory garage location - whichate proposed within 75. feet of a bulkhead, concrete wall, or similar,�tru scture. Applicant's February x;1998 Affidavit states + the proposed use ofgarage to be r fo"occiipialile:spae6" intended as a-family,room', library/study with- wefA ar facility:- Another j January `6, j0'97 Notice of Dis=' approval regarding,tliis site was ,issued disapproving a proposed guest annex m proposed acces- (,, `y garage, Article III, Section ,,,,J-31B(13).Location ofProp - erty; 680 Midway Road, 1 Southold, NY; 1.000-90-2=9.1; Cedar Beach Park, Lot 111-112- j part of 144 (as a single parcel). - 6:40 p.m. Appl. No. 4575 - FRANK GASTON" . This is a variance request under the Zon- ing Code Article XXIII; Section 100-239AB based upon the i Building Inspector's August 20, 1997 Notice of Disapproval (up- ! dated -5/7/98), disapproving a building permit application for a deck addition to dwelling with a, - setback at less than 75 feet from a bulkhead, concrete wall, 'or similar structure,, at.. 1875 Bayview Avenue, Greenport,., NY; 1000-52-5-5. I 6:45 p.m. Appl. No. 4571 - WALTER MILLIS. This is a variance request under the Zon- ing Code Article IIIA-, Section 100-30A.3, based upon the. Building Inspector's April 14, 1 1998 Notice of Disapproval, dis- approving a building permit ap- plication to remove existing shed and replace with accessory ga- rage, which will exceed allow- able -lot coverage of 20% at 1800 (a/k/a 1875) Village Lane, Ori- ent, NY; 10000-24-2-22. 6:50 p.m. Appl. No: 4576- CHARLES D. SNYDER. This is a variance request under the Zoning Code, Article IIIA, Sec- tion 100-30A.4, based upon the Building Inspector's May 8, 1998 Notice of Disapproval, disap- proving a building permit appli- cation for an accessory garage due to its proposed location in an l area other than the rear yard 'at 704 Wiggins Lane, -Greenport; 1000-35-4-28.24 (formerly CTM Lot 19). = 6:55 p.m; Appl: No. 4577- CARL AND LYNNE FRITSCHER. This is a vari- &=6request under Article based . upon the Building Inspector's May 8, 1998 Notice of Disap- proval, disapproving a building permit. application for a new single-family dwelling with pro- posed front yard setbacks of less than 50 feet. Location of Prop- erty: 135 Pine Tree Court, and along Pine Court Extension (a/ k/a Private Roads), Cuichogue, NY; 1000-98-1-7..15. 7:10 p.m. Appl. No. 4578 STEPHEN AND ANGELA PUTZI. This is a variance re- questunder Article IIIA, Section 100-30A.4, based upon the Building Inspector's April 28, 1998 Notice of Disapproval, dis- approving a building permit ap- plication -to construct addition to -- a existing accessory garage in a front yard location at 2575 (a/ k/a 2500) Lighthouse -Road and Soundview Avenue;' Southold, f NY- 1000-50-3-6.:. 7:15 n.m. Anol.- No. 4579- CIELA-TKA. This is 'a request foraSplocial Exception to estab- lish Accessory Apartment Use in f the principal building of the f owner -applicants as provided under- Article III, Section' 100- •31B-13 (formerly, 100-31B-14) of the Zoning Code. Location Or 1 P,roperty:. 260 Cedar Summit I to be heard in the above l` Road, Southold, NY; 1.000-78-9- ci abuse on the lot desiring to sub re (Bayside Terrace')'. beingtheP p applications ,or desiring mit written statements before the, '' . 7:20 p.m. Appl._ No. 4580- , is required to have to end of each hearing• ALBERT AND JANICE' setback' of 70 feet pursuant the pro-- will not start ear- ' RATTI. This is, a variance -re- Art. XIV; 100-142; 3) Then designated. quest.under Article XXIV,.Sec posed tower is requued to be 10- lier than designated. The file is. tion. 100-242 (.100-244); based cated at least one -hundred 'dwelling available for review during r hours (8-, upon the Building' Inspector's feet from the nearest' dwelling lar Town gall business 1{ unit pursuant to Article xvl 4 p m) If you have questions, May 1.9, 1998 Notice of Disap- Section 100-162C.3... _ lease°do-iiothesitateto ca1h765 proval, disapproving a ;building The Board of Appehls will -at- p ; permit application to reconstruct said time and place hear any and 18 Dated: May 20.1998 dwelling which tha50 % by fire and p pro,- I' all persons or representatives BY ORDER OF THE,more, BOARD'1 i SOUTHOLD T OF APPEALS, i GERARD P GOEHRINGER,! Chairman _ 1X-5128198(172), b UUM ON O PP OF THE NEWS - LEGAL NOTICE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS NOTICE -IS' HEREBY i GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the Code ! of 'the- Town. of Southold, -the t following -applications, will be held for public hearings by the . SOUTHOLD-TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS, -at the Southold Town Hall,` 53095 Main Roads Southold, New York 11971;on i THURSDAY, JUNE 11;1997 as noted below (or as:soon there- ( after as possible): r 5:45 p.m. N'06 No. COUNTY Yacht j Sales, Appt. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK ss: Patricia C. Lollot, being duly sworn, says that she is the Production Coordinator, of the TRAV- ELER WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the no- tice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in said Traveler Watchman once each week for .....................weeks .................................................. successively, commencing on the ...%9 .......... u day o .........�.... ......... ........ .19.47 . .. ... ...................................... ...a Sworn to before me this..........�.... ...-'dYof ................................... ........ ,19... lQ� ............. ....................G� . Notary Public BARBARA A. SCHNEIDER NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New York No. 4806846 Qualified in Suffolk Coun Commission Expires 83/98' posed to be rebuilt witli ;an in- sufficient front yard setback. Location of Property: '420 Lesters Road, Mattituck;: 1000- 114-7-8. 7:30 p.m. Appl. No. 4544- . MARTIN ROS EN (OWNER: O BOOKER &ANO.) Loca- tion of Property: 11780 Sound Avenue, Mattituck, NY; County Parcel #1000--141-3.-44. This is a request for Interpretation and/ or Variances based upon the "Building Inspector's February 181998 Notice of Disapproval, disapproving a building permit application to construct.a tower for telecommunications use, for the following reason: 1) the pro- posed telecommunications tower being located on a nonconform- ing. lot in an LI -District •is not permitted according to Section 100-16513; 2) the proposed tower j (1-516) 765-1809 tel. OFFICE OF BOARD OF APPEALS 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 (1-516) 765-9064 fax. May 20, 1998 Re: ZBA Application Hearing Date: Thursday, June 11, 1998 Dear Q. I For your records, please find enclosed a copy of the Legal Notice describing the time,. date and place of the public hearing regarding your application. (Our department will arrange for publication in the official newspaper: L.I. Traveler, Southold.) Town Code Chapter 58, . requires. that the applicant send "NOTICE GIVING THE TIME, DATE, PLACE AND NATURE OF THE HEARING." Please send a copy of a map showing the proposed project area, together with a cover letter with your name and address to the "OWNERS shown on the local assessment roll for every property which abuts and is across from any public or private street from the applicant's property." These mailings must be by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, within five (5) days of receiving this- letter. This will allow for the green signature cards to be returned to you., and then submitted to us for the official. (If the green signature cards are not received by the hearing date, a delay is possible before receiving action by the Board.) Please be sure to: I. "return the Affidavit of Mailing to' us when the certified mail receipts are postmarked on the day of mailing, attaching a written list signed by the person verifying the same from the Assessors' Assessment Roll, which lists all the lot numbers and owners' names, current addresses from on -the local assessment rolls, and the date the listing was obtained from the Assessors' Office. 2. Place the enclosed Poster in the location described by Ch. 58 of the Code, within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street, for a time period of not less than seven days. The sign must be posted not later than June 3rd. 3. Return a completed Affidavit of Posting by the hearing date. 4. Return the green signature cards at or before the hearing. Page 2 - Instruction Letter Meeting of April 16, 1998 Southold Town Board of Appeals Please call if you have any questions. Thank you. Very truly yours, Gerard P. Goehringer Chairman by Linda Kowalski/� Enclosures (Notice, Two Affidavits, and Sign) AS400/txt1k/1nag.98/app1.1n VIW.d ............................................................................... TRANSMISSION RESULT REPORT .................... ( MAY 22 '98 09:34AM )................., SOL LD TOWN HALL 516 765 1823 .................................................................... ..............................................:.....:.............................. ........... ............. :. (AUTO) ...................... DATE START REMOTE TERMINAL, TIME RE- MODE TOTAL PERSONAL LABEL FILE TIME IDENTIFICATION SULTS PAGES 'NO. 09. 33 MAY 2 RM~ 5167654643 01'42" OK ESCED 004 ..O.. NN......... 6.440............1.1 •6......•.......#6040400..... H6••164000 ..... .11U•R•.... .4.4.46.• ....... )4e1N0H.U•.000H R•.pH.l.H 01H•..H..HIU UI•.....14.6H 00.•1. H.110•U•.•l.H H11N01•.•II N E)ECM >)REDUCTION S)STRNDARD M)MEMORY C)CONFIDENTIAL #)BATCH D)DETAIL $)TRANSFER F)FINE P)POLLING e&44oA4> 1N6 , F C r //, q NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, concerning this property. OWNER(S) OF RECORD: ✓�/%£q� „6ruLd/N6 SicPPI� DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: �uRs . � a 0 //, /998 ter'.• �6p.ow If you have an interest in this project, you are invited to view the Town file(s) which are available for inspection prior to the day of the hearing during' normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. BOARD OF APPEALS •TOWN OF SOUTHOLD e (516) 765-1809 Vp 1b)✓CXs goo -133C • ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER �f�o�S�fFOL��oG o y� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold;'New York 11971 ' Fax(516)765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 OFF CE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC ACCESS TO RECORDS INSTRUCTIONS: Please complete Section I of this form and give to Town Clerk's Office (agency Freedom of Information Officer) . One copy will be returned to you in response to your request, o;r as an interim response. SECTION 1. TO: (Department or Officer, if Known, that has the information you are requesting.)' RECORD YOU WISH TO INSPECT: (Describe the record sought. If possible, supply date, file title, tax map number, and any other pertinent information.) Signature of Applicant: Printed Name: PAf1& 11 1'%i Address: Mailing Address (if different _Telephone Number: [ ] APPROVED [ ] APPROVED WITH DELA n above) : Date: [ ] DENIED* f�9 AY 2 i 1995 r-nzavetn n. _ wevmt: Date Fr'eednm of Information Officer [own Clerk suuinoia / * If delayed or denied see reverse side for explanation. La"INING BOARD MEMBER,~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer RE: Riverhead Building and Supply Main Road, Greenport SCTM# 1000-45-1-1 DATE: April 1, 1998 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 I! ` APR Z JAB The Planning Board has reviewed the above application with the applicant's agent and has reached agreement to move the building ten feet to the south and add ten feet of landscaping to the front yard landscaped area. In addition, the applicant's agent has agreed to place an evergreen landscaped hedge across the entire length of the north parking row to screen the cars from view. The Board feels that with these changes they can proceed with the processing of this application. 7 PLANNING BOARD MEMBER nd OFF04 BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS k KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Jr �� TO: Gerard P. Goehringer FROM: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer -k PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RE: Request for comments: T. Petikas Riverhead Building & Supply M. Rosen Radio Tower Nextel Communications GMAC/ Former Empire Service Station Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 MAY T. Petikas Recommend that Suffolk County Department ofPublic Works be notified as we understand that road work is planned for Route 48. Riverhead Building & Supply . See attached memo dated April 1, 1998. Rosen Radio Tower Board feels that Town Code Article XVI, 100-160, Wireless Communication Facilities applies to this use. Nextel Communications . Board favors this collocation of antenna. AMAC/former Empire Service Station . See attached memo dated March 10, 1998 Attachments PLANNING BOARD BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM- JR. RICHARD G. WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer RE: Riverhead Building and Supply Main Road, Greenport SCTM# 1000-45-1-1 DATE: April 1, 1998 _. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 MAY I.3 The Planning Board has reviewed the above application with the applicant's agent and has reached agreement to move the building ten feet to the south and. add ten feet of landscaping to the front yard landscaped area. In addition, the applicant's agent has agreed to place an evergreen landscaped hedge across the entire length of the north parking row to screen the cars from view. The Board feels that with these changes they can proceed with the processing of this application. PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAY 1 3 TO: Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer RE: Request for .comments Empire Service Station ° Main Road, Laurel SCTM# 1000-122-7-1 DATE: March 10, 1998 This will update our memo to you of December 29, 1997, on -the above request for a variance. The applicant has, of this date, not submitted a site plan application as requested by this Board. for the proposed canopy. Instead, we have received a waiver request which this Board has denied. The attached papers show: 1. A preliminary site plan was submitted to the Planning Board on 12-29-86. 2. A variance was granted for the convenience store on April 23, 1987, with findings that a site plan application was presently before the Planning Board. (The Planning Board had only a preliminary plan, not an application and fee) . 3. The Planning Board coordinated this preliminary site plan with the New York State Department of Transportation, and received recommendations for curbing and eight other safety items. This DOT requirement was sent to the applicant for compliance. 4. The applicant did not continue with the site plan. Wo 1 5. The Building Department received a letter from the DOT on February 28, 1995, requesting that a Certificate of Occupancy not be issued for the Convenience Store until the DOT recommended safety improvements were made. 6. On February 13, 1998, the Planning Board received a waiver request for a proposed canopy. 7. On February 18, 1998, the Planning Board sent a letter to the applicants agent denying the waiver request because the intensity of use at the site had been increased by the convenience store thus requiring site plan review. 6. In its February 18, 1998, letter, this Board .requested that the applicant continue with the site plan application and DOT safety improvements. 7. As previously mentioned, to date the Board has not received the requested site plan. cc: Edward Forester, Director of code Enforcement Laury Dowd, Town Attorney Garrett Strang, R.A. MAy 1: 3'- D Tel. (516) 727-3947 ALLEN M. SMITH Attorney and (Counselor at Law 737 Roanoke Avenue, P.O. ]fox 1240 Riverhead, New York 11901 March 23, 1998 Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Robert G. Kassner, P.E. Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Riverhead Building Supply Corp. - Greenport Ladies and Gentlemen: ]Fax: (516) 727-3950 � Q3/ fill I note Mr. Kassner's memorandum dated March 13, 1998. Please accept the following in support of the same. My client has conducted a review of the business conducted at the Greenport location during 1997. During 1997, Greenport averaged 102± counter tickets per day. The high during the summer was 125± and the low in the winter was 70±. Again, the Greenport location is and will remain a lumberyard whose principal function will be the delivery of lumber products to job sites. The actual counts experienced by Riverhead Building Supply at Greenport are consistent with estimated counts predicated by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. The appropriate standard is that for a Building Materials and Lumber Store (812 of the Trip Generation Manual 6th Edition). These standards are gauged on the number of employees and/or the sales floor area. The Greenport yard has 15 employees. The standard calls out.an average of 200 vehicle trips per day (200 entering and 200 exiting). The gross floor area of the proposed sales area for the Greenport yard is 7,350± square feet. This standard calls out an average of 150 vehicle trips per day (150 entering and 150 exiting). Zoning Board of Appeals Robert G. Kassner, P.E. March 23, 1998 Page Two Should you require any further or different information, please contact me. Very truly yours, QQ2"- Allen M. Smith AMS: ked cc: Mr. Edgar Goodale Mr. Jessie R. Goodale, III ALLEN M. SMITH Attorney and Counselor at Law 737 Roanoke Avenue, P.O. ]Box 1240 Tel. (516) 727-3947 Riverhead, New York 11901 Fax: (16) 727-3950 March 23, 1998 Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Robert G. Kassner, P.E. Site Plan Reviewer. Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Riverhead Building Supply Corp..- Greenport Ladies and Gentlemen: I note Mr. Kassner's memorandum dated March 13, 1998. Please accept the following in support of the same. My client has conducted a review of the business conducted at the Greenport location during 1997. During 1997, Greenport averaged 102± counter tickets per day. The high during the summer was 125± and the low in the winter was 70±. Again, the Greenport location is and will remain a lumberyard whose principal function will be the delivery of lumber products to job sites. The actual counts experienced by Riverhead Building Supply at Greenport are consistent with estimated counts predicated by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. The appropriate standard is that for a Building Materials and Lumber Store (812 of the Trip Generation Manual 6th Edition). These standards are gauged on the number of employees and/or the sales floor area. The Greenport yard has 15 employees. The standard calls out an average of 200 vehicle trips per day (200 entering and 200 exiting). . The gross floor area of the proposed sales area for. the Greenport yard is 7,350± square feet. This standard calls out an average of 150 vehicle trips per day (150 entering and 150 exiting). Zoning Board of Appeals Robert G. Kassner, P.E. March 23, 1998 Page Two Should you require any further or different information, please contact me. Very truly yours, Allen M. Smith AMS: ked cc: Mr. Edgar Goodale Mr. Jessie R. Goodale, III ALLEN M. SMITH H[ Attorney and Counselor at Law 737 Roanoke Avenue, P.O. Box 1240 Tel: (516) 727-3947 Riverhead.. New.York 11901 'Fax: (516) 727-3950 March 23, 1998 Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Robert G. Kassner, P.E. Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Riverhead Building Supply Corp. - Greenport Ladies and Gentlemen: I note Mr. Kassner's memorandum dated March 13,.1998. Please accept the following in support of the same. My client has conducted a review of the business conducted at the Greenport location during -1997. During 1997, Greenport averaged 102± counter tickets per day. The high during -the summer was 125± and the low in the winter was 70±. Again, the Greenport location is and.will remain a lumberyard whose principal function will be the delivery of lumber products to job sites. The actual counts experienced by Riverhead Building Supply at Greenport are consistent with estimated counts predicated by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. The appropriate standard is that for a Building Materials and Lumber Store (812 of the Trip Generation Manual 6th Edition). These standards are gauged on the number of employees and/or the 3ale3 floor area. The Greenport yard has 15 employees. The standard calls out an average of 200 vehicle trips per day (200 entering and 200 exiting). The gross floor area of the proposed sales area for the Greenport yard is 7,350± square feet. This standard calls out an' average of 150 vehicle trips per day (150 entering and 150 exiting). Zoning Board of Appeals Robert G. Kassner, P.E. March 23, 1998 Page Two Should you require any further or different information, please contact me. Very truly yours, t Allen M. Smith AMS: ked cc: Mr. Edgar Goodale Mr. Jessie R. Goodale, III r ALLEN -M. SA 1L H Attorney and Counselor at Law 737 Roanoke Avenue, P.O. Box 1240 Tel: (516) 727-394.7 Riverhead, New York 1,1901 Fax: (516) 727-3950 March 23, 1998 Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Robert G. Kassner, P.E. Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Riverhead Building Supply Corp. - Greenport Ladies and Gentlemen: I note Mr. Kassner's memorandum dated March 13, 1998. Please accept the following in support of the same." My client has conducted a review, of the business conducted at the Greenport location during 1997. During 1997, Greenport averaged 102± counter tickets per day. The high during the summer was 125± and the low in the winter was 70±.. Again, the Greenport location is and.will remain a lumberyard whose principal function will be the delivery of lumber products to job sites. The actual counts experienced by Riverhead Building Supply at Greenport are consistent with estimated counts predicated by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. The appropriate standard is that for a Building Materials and Lumber Store (812 of the Trip Generation Manual 6th Edition). These standards are gauged on the number of employees and/or the sales floor area. The Greenport yard has 15 employees. The standard calls outan average of 200 vehicle trips per day (200 entering and 200 exiting). The gross floor area of the proposed sales area for the Greenport yard is 7,350± square feet. This standard calls out an average of 150 vehicle trips per day (150 entering and 150 exiting). Zoning Board of Appeals Robert G. Kassner, P.E. March 23, 1998 Page Two Should you require any further or different information, please contact me. Very truly yours, Q � Allen M. Smith_.. AMS: ked cc: Mr. Edgar Goodale Mr. Jessie R. Goodale, III PLANNING BOARD MEMBEf, , BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. 1 I/N Chirman WILLIAM J. CREMERS II KENNETH L. EDWARDS t�GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Zoning Board of Appeals {� FROM: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer fJ` RE: Request for comments Riverhead Building and Supply Main Road, Greenport SCTM# 1000-46-1-2.1 DATE: March 17, 1998 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 This will supplement our memo of March 13, 1998, commenting on the above project. The Board has advised the applicant to move the building ten feet to the south and relocate the front row of parking. This will allow for increased u front yard landscaping. The Board feels that the relocation of the parking, increased setback and additional landscaping will ameliorate the width of the building. ,O1 ii SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD 0/u AUGUST 8, 1995 5:05 P.M. IN THE MATTER OF A PROPOSED "LOCAL LAW IN RELATION TO FRONT YARD SETBACKS". Present: Supervisor Thomas H. Wickham Councilman Joseph J. Lizewski Councilwoman Alice J. Hussie Councilwoman Ruth D. Oliva Councilman Joseph L. Townsend, Jr. Justice Louisa P. Evans Town Clerk Judith T. Terry Town Attorney Laury L. Dowd SUPERVISOR WICKHAM: We'll go on to the next hearing. COUNCILWOMAN OLIVA: "Public Notice is Hereby Given that there has been presented to the Town Board of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, on the 27th day of June, 1995, a Local Law entitled, "A Local Law in Relation to Front Setbacks". Notice is further given that the Town Board of the Town of Southold will hold a public hearing on the aforesaid Local Law at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, on the 8th day of August, 1995, at 5:05 P.M., at which time all interested persons will be heard. This proposed "Local Law in Relation to Front Yard Setbacks" reads as follows: BE IT ENACTED, by the Town Board of the Town of Southold as follows: Chapter 100 (Zoning) of the Code of the Town of Southold is hereby amended as follows: 1. Section 100-83 (Frontyard Setbacks) is hereby added as follows: (a) Structures shall be set back at least one hundred (100) feet from the right-of-way. (b) There shall be an exception to (a) if the adjacent parcels are developed, in which case the minimum frontward setback shall be the average of the setbacks of the adiacent parcels. u A proiect shall be divided into separate structures so that no single structure shall have more than sixty (60) linear feet of frontage on one street. The setbacks of multiple structures on a parcel may vary, provided that the average setback of the structures meets the setback required above and all buildinas are at least seventv-five 75) feet from the rig ht-of-wa .. pg 2 P. H. Section 100-103 (Frontyard Setbacks) is hereby added as follows: (a) Structures shall be set back at least one hundred (100) feet from the right-of-way. (b) There shall be an exception to (a) if the adjacent parcels are developed, in which case the minimum frontward setback shall be the average of the setbacks of the adjacent parcels_ LO A proiect shall be divided into separate structures so that no single structure shall have more than sixth (60) linear feet of frontage on one street. The setbacks of multiple structures on a parcel may vary, provided that the average setback of the structures meets (lie setback required above and all buildings are at least seventy-five_ L75) feet from the right -of -waw Section 100-143 (Frontyard Setbacks) is hereby added as follows: (aj Structures shall beset back at least one hundred (100) feet from the right-of-way. (b) There shall be an exception to a) if the adjacent parcels are .developed, in which case the minimum frontward setback shall be the average of the setbacks of the adjacent parcels. M A proiect shall be divided into separate structures so that no single structure shall have more than sixty (60) linear feet of frontage on one street. The setbacks of multiple structures on a parcel may vary, provided that the average setback of the structures meets the setback required above and all buildings are at least seventy-five (75) feet from the right-of-way. Section 100-133 (Frontyard Setbacks) is: hereby added as follows: (a1 Structures shall beset back at least one hundred_ (100) feet from the right-of-way. - (W There shall be an exception to (a) if the adjacent parcels are developed, in which case the minimum frontward setback shall be the average of the setbacks of the adjacent parcels pg 3 P.H. (c) A Proiect shall be divided into separate structures so that no single structure shall have more than sixty (60) linear feet of frontage on one street. The setbacks of multiple structures on a parcel may vary, provided that the average setback of the structures meets the setback required above and all buildings are at least seventy-five (75) feet from the right-of-way. 5, Bulk Schedule for Business, Office and Industrial Districts is hereby amended as shown on attached page. f� Mhdmimi mp-llen,ew s rat basl"ess, onlce, I1;,sl,hd nt allies naatesldenllnl use' IA %lie Isqume feel) 1.01 011111 (reel) IM del -111 fficn rood )pill (rcell sille ynwl Ircrl) ntnl, side yntds (rccl) Item 1.1,111 (reel) I.nndscnl,e men 11estenll Mnslnn1,w pet11dlled 111111e11f1011e Ltd cmemge (peleeld) IIw1111ing belgbl (reel) Nuwd,cl nr sinl les I'M I l;s* Town of Sotdholrl Bulk Schedule for Business, Office will Induslllnl L)Inlrlcls ' Fn, minlnn1,n tegwltemenss rot raidenllnl uses, serer ntsl to Density and Allnlunun L.a1 She Scliednle rot Ilmoesldenllnl DIWICls end Ihen 10 npplopllele )ndlcnled Column III II1e 11111k SCIlethile rat nesideatinl Ura. In the Mnrltie I still Meslne 11 Illsoltls, "Illy lend Chore mean Illph welet d,nll gonllry rot sten eelcalndont tlerct In npptnpdele nine Ordlnence. II. This Local Law shall take effect upon its filing with the Secretary of State. * Underline represents additions. ** Strikethrough represents deletions. Copies of this Local Law are available in the Office of the Town Clerk to any interested persons during business hours. Dated: July. 25, 1995. Judith T. Terry, Southold Town Clerk." We have some correspondence. Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A '14-14 to 23 of the Suffolk County Administration Code, the above referenced application which has been submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is considered to be a matter for local determination as there is no apparent significant county -wide or inter -community _impacts. A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Very truly yours, Stephen M. Jones, Director of" Planning. We, also, have an affidavit that it has been published in The Suffolk Times, and an affidavit from Judith I,I0 Ln Ili 11 LI6h11ndnsltlnl 1.1 Llmhed Ilemlel rlrnunl M.I M•11 RnliTinmed LIEN nnslness nuslness Ih,slume hindne 1 bintb,e It Orrice Palk Indwsltlnl oil (010 2110011 )0,11110 •1(1,00(1 A011011 I lfl,lmll .M 111WI 115 ill 1111 Illi 1311 )1111 IIN1 2511 11111 Ili 130 Ili lilt 150 At ynllnllla' I l a11 v"Ilnblc' Ss 31 IS ynll"bh' 20 111 23 Hl 23 to )n 113 2 5 50 113 w 6t) III )5 25 l3 15 25 73 M 35 7.1 .1.1 IS 711 1.1 71 20 .111 )1) JIl 311 I0 111 35 35 35 33 35 .15 .13 2'1/, 2 7 2 1 7 2 ' Fn, minlnn1,n tegwltemenss rot raidenllnl uses, serer ntsl to Density and Allnlunun L.a1 She Scliednle rot Ilmoesldenllnl DIWICls end Ihen 10 npplopllele )ndlcnled Column III II1e 11111k SCIlethile rat nesideatinl Ura. In the Mnrltie I still Meslne 11 Illsoltls, "Illy lend Chore mean Illph welet d,nll gonllry rot sten eelcalndont tlerct In npptnpdele nine Ordlnence. II. This Local Law shall take effect upon its filing with the Secretary of State. * Underline represents additions. ** Strikethrough represents deletions. Copies of this Local Law are available in the Office of the Town Clerk to any interested persons during business hours. Dated: July. 25, 1995. Judith T. Terry, Southold Town Clerk." We have some correspondence. Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A '14-14 to 23 of the Suffolk County Administration Code, the above referenced application which has been submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is considered to be a matter for local determination as there is no apparent significant county -wide or inter -community _impacts. A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Very truly yours, Stephen M. Jones, Director of" Planning. We, also, have an affidavit that it has been published in The Suffolk Times, and an affidavit from Judith pg 4 P. H. T. Terry, that it has been placed on the Town Clerk's Bulletin Board. We also have one other communication from the Chairman of the Planning Board, which reads as follows: Dear Mrs. Terry, At it's July 10, 1995 meeting, the Planning Board adopted the following report. The Planning Board has reviewed the proposed amendment to the Zoning Code pertaining to front yard setbacks in Limited Business (LB), General Business (B) and Light Industrial Office (LIO) and Light Industrial (LI). The Board supports this proposed local law because it will help soften the visual impact of development alongside the main roads, will prevent the construction of strip -type retail structures, and will help maintain the rural character of our Town. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward, Chairman. There are no further communications. SUPERVISOR WICKHAM: Would anyone like to address the Board on this public hearing? (No response.) I might very briefly preface these comments by saying that this legislation is pursuant to a policy resolution, that the Board adopted over a year .ago, pledging to keep open the character of Route 48, and the other major roads in town to avoid a strip development appearance, and to keep the visual distance that are currently available for people driving through. Also, to keep Route 48 as an express road without a lot of traffic congestion. Anyone like to address the Board on this proposed Local Law? (No response.) If not; I declare the hearing closed. Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk PLANNINiG BOARD MEMBEV,5- �oSUFF01/( BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. �o G Chairman O �1 WILLIAM J. CREMERS cc 2 KENNETH L. EDWARDS �y • �� GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer RE: Request for comments Riverhead Building and Supply Main Road, Greenport SCTM# 1000-46-1-2.1 DATE: March 13, 1998 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 This is in response to your memo of March 4, 1998, requesting comments on the width of the above building, eight foot high fence and traffic v; concerns. The Board does not have concerns with the eight foot fence as it is located 185' south of the property line and Route 25. The Board feels that this type of enclosed lumber warehouse is unique in design and requires this size (width) building. The Long Environmental Assessment Form, LEAF, was originally submitted with the Change of Zone Request sent to the Town Board and reviewed 'i by the Town's Consultant, (report attached) . -r, In discussing the traffic considerations with our consultant, it was felt that the major customer traffic would be local, as there is a similar building in Riverhead. The North Fork customer base would be split between Riverhead and Southold (Greenport) . The Board does not feel that the traffic to the Greenport location would increase materially. V Fi IiEGISTitAR OF VITAL STATISTICS • MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SEQR ; NEGATIVE DECLARATION Towh-Haiif-V 096 Main Southold, New Yolk 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 Notice of Determination of Non -Significance Lead Agency: Town of Southold Town Board Address: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Date: October 15; 1996 D OCT 2 3 1996 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617, of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement need not be prepared. Title of Action: Riverhead Building Supply Corp. Change of Zone SCTM: 1000-046-01-2.1 SEQR Status: Unlisted Action Project Description: The subject application involves a change of zone from Hamlet Density (HD) to Light Industrial/Planned Office Park (LIO). Location: The 3.5 acre subject site is located on the south side of NYS Route 25 (Main Road), approximately 170 feet west of Moore's Lane In the hamlet of Greenport. Reasons Supporting This Determination: This determination is issued in full consideration of the Criteria for Determination of Significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.7, the Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I,11 and the following specific reasons: M Reasons Supporting This Determination: This project involves the construction of a 50,425 square foot lumber yard supply building. A variance application is before the Board of Appeals for building width. The building width must be approved by the Board of Appeals before site plan approval. A full environmental impact statement was reviewed by the town's consultant in conjunction with the zone change application to the Town Board. A lumber yard supply building is a permitted use in this Light Industrial Park/Planned Office Park (LIO), thus the proposed action is consistent with zoning. An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed, and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. There has not been any correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. The applicant will have to comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) and all relevant standards of water supply and sewage disposal systems. Design and flow specification, subsurface soil conditions and site plan details will have to be approved by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). This impact is not considered significant due to the anticipated project compliance with established requirements of the SCSC and the SCDHS and the required relevant permits. For Further Information: Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 cc: John P. Cahill, DEC Albany Suffolk County Dept. of Health Suffolk County Water Authority New York State Dept. of Transportation Judith Terry, Town Clerk Suffolk County Dept. of Public Works Southold Town Building Dept. Applicant .� x --e 'C�+'.� , r-rr-'•� n--o-'r--.�4-A..m- t �, ;�zt:r:r•--°l;� =`'t' .y' .,,� ''r.. , ,.�-\,+� Vii. ,n , �'�; �=r, t, ..ir�': T g r.r., - ?7:�`?:p'"r .};r, ', .S'• :�': i;}5,..,, ','s'.': fir... .„'... }•.���'�' .). ^Y` - .:r=r, .ri � of Southold Planning Board reviewed the subject application and recommended a negative declaration for the change of zone for the following reasons: surrounding properties are mostly commercial, the nature of the use will not require large volumes of water nor generate large volumes of wastewater; and the change of zone to LIO is in keeping; th the commercial 7-11 store to the north and LIO zone to the west. 2. Through inspection and consultation of environmental references it has been determined that the site does not contain sensitive environmental resources. 3. The proposed action will not set significant precedent, as' it represents a unique scenario. 4. The size and location of the subject site makes it less desirable PID residential uses, in consideration of adjacent land uses (including. the Riverhead Building Supply facility to the west, 7-11 convenience store to the north and the LIRR tracks to the south) and in view of the inability to provide adequate on-site buffers. 5. The existing Riverhead Building Supply facility is considered to be pre-existing and non -conforming with respect to building setbacks. Approximately 330 linear feet of existing structures on the existing Riverhead Building Supply property are within 5 feet of the common property line with the subject site. The current Town of Southold Zoning Code requires a minimum side yard setback of 30 feet in the LIO I zoning district, 25 feet of which must be landscaped when adjacent to parcels zoned HD. If residential development on the subject site were to occur it may be adversely impacted by the lack of adequate buffering on the adjacent site to the west. 6. The proposed action would permit the expansion of the existing building materials storage and sales use and would allow for the better design of the facility, with side yard buffers from adjacent residential sites to the east, allowing for a more appropriate transitional zone. 7. In consideration of site characteristics and surrounding land uses, LIO zoning would permit the highest and best use of the subject site. 8. Although the action was not specifically recommended in recent master plan updates, the action appears consistent with Town comprehensive planning in consideration of site specific issues. 9. The proposed action is for a change of zone and further review under the Planning Board site plan review process will be necessary prior to development of the subject site. At that time, various aspects of the project may be addressed including buffered setbacks, site layout, and locations of sanitary and stormwater structures. 10. Proposed project is not of significant magnitude or impact to warrant the preparation of a Draft EIS, and will not cause a significant burden on natural or community resources. For Further Information: Contact Person: Judith Terry, Town Clerk Town of Southold Clerk's Office 53095 Main Road, P.O, Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 e (516) 165-1800 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner -Department of Environmental Conservation Regional Office -New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation Southold Town Planning Board A-' Southold Town Clerk's Bulletin Board Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning NYS Legislative Commission on Water Resource Needs of Long Island Riverhead Building Supply Corp. KENNETH L. EDWARDS _,. GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD - State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non -Significant Telephone (516) 765-1938 August 11, 1997 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality: Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed site plan for Riverhead Building Supply SCTM#: 1000-46-1-2.1 Location: ' Main Rd., Greenport SEAR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (-X) - Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: This, proposed site plan is for the construction of a 50,425 square foot lumber yard supply building. '.. W STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OFFICE BUILDING 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y_ 11788-5518 CRAIG 3IRAl:I15A, P.E. ACTING REGIONAL DIRECTOR August 13, 1997 Nir. Robert G. Kassner Southold Planning Board Town Ilall - 53095 Nlain Road P.O. Box 1 179 Southold, New York 11971 Riverhead Building Sunnly Route 25 Greenport Dcar Mr. Kassncr: JOSEPt1 H. BOARDMAN COMMISSIONER We have reviewed the Environmental Assessment F'orm lin' the referenced proposed reconstruction. We concur that the Southold Planning Board should assume SE -QR lead agency status. The State has no construction projects scheduled in this location in our five year planning program. F'or highway work permit information, please have the developer contact V. Lcna at 952-6020. For other information you may contact G. l3cierling at 952-6128. "Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal. Very truly yours, Nf1CIlAl?1_ AZER Planning & Program Management , Li LJ AUG 1 91991 ye - ' - ._-_. yl sem. 1—... •, • - .d :4 I:ti \ � I' ' - ,`'• �,_. ___..�-_.--. e...- "`, i, a ii .. '� � � MAR "•.� �_-.�� , ; ' , . , .. . March 5, 1998 Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman - Zoning Board Of Appeals.. Town Of Southold Town Hall, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York' 11971 Re: 74610 &745.00 Mairi Road (Route 25) _ _ Greenport;. New York .11944 SCTM# 10.0.0-46-01-01 &'2.11 Owner: The Riverhead Building, Supply.-Corp. ; Subject: ,Application dated October 22, 1997, for Pdmit to Construct A' Building.Supply Facility Dear Mr. Chairman:' This letter, is written in direct. response to a front page'article entitled DRIVE THROUGH PLANNED in the March 4, 1998 issue of,NORTH,FORK'SUFFOLK LIFE: (see,exhibit #1). As u director and on •behalf of the members of THE PHEASANT RUN HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION, I submit for.your review several of our major concerns, relative-to the,captiolied application., First let me state, we have been.monitoring subject -application since it's inception. Please refer to NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL dated January 2, .1998 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,-'BUILDING DEPARTMENT. (see exhibit #2) PHEASANT RUN CONDON 41UMS are located on Moore's Lane in Greenport. This road has become a'heavily,traveled corridor connectirig County Road 4.8 to Route 25;''� . Moore's Lane currently services 'coimnercial vehicles, passenger cars and pedestrian traffic: We feel 'corifident the you and THE DOT share our concern'over the,negative impact that a 50,000 square commercial "DRIVE THROUGH FACILITY"' would create. 'Peconic Properties,. P.O. Box 1143,. Cutchogue, New York 11935 .-:Tel: (516).477-8840 To encourage increased consumer,traffic iii this -region;•Where there are already ekisting businesses.- near by Public School and various tourism�attractions and'events sends-a clear message: of CAUTION.' Additional concerns include those of an" environmental' nature. The magnitude and design of a warehouse (see exhibit 93) of the proposed project within 300 fe_ et of Tidal Wetlands 'is, a °"RED FLAG Public Officials and residents. of the'area MUST remain dedicated t_o the, preservation-of of, . the scenic_ parklike concept. as a GATEWAY TO_ GR ,ENPORT.' ; We are recommending that the. Board Of Appeals and Southold Planning Board'reject _ this application , „ ; Thank you -for'your.time. ` Sincerely;, ' -' ,., ,. -' , ' , - \ , .- , •'- _ ,{" ' , . _ . .Lynda Lee 'Spangel" : _. . ' _ •, .. Pheasant Run Home Owners Association Member Board: Of Directors .cc: Southold Town Planning Board . Pheasant Run"Hoine Owners. •, - - - •, - ,.. - _ _ "; V• ,..- {• � 14 � . ' 1, .. ,,( :'f •{ ,.l � '� , '.r %,•f' �` - - - .�� _ r - 1. Ir -°�, '- . ,-Peconic'Pr6pertik P.O. Box 1.143, ;Cutchogue, N6w;Y6rk,1'1935. - Tel: (516)477-8840 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attomey at Law 315 Westphalia Road w P.O. Box 483 return this Mattituck, New York 11952 1 . H ■ Print your name and address on the reverse of this so we can Tel: (516) 298-5629 j Fax: (516) 298-5664 �A�n 22 �? d 0! March 19, 1998 Southold Town Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Att: Ms. Linda Kowalski RE: Riverhead Building Supply Corp. Application Hearing Date: March 23, 1998 Dear Linda: Enclosed please find two (2) additional return receipt cards for the Affidavit of Mailing for the above referenced matter. Very truly yours, Patricia C. Moore By: Margaret Rutkowski, ,,..r..L ` d SENDER: • o ■ Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. I also wish to receive the w ■Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b. form that return this following services (for an 1 . H ■ Print your name and address on the reverse of this so we can extra fee): j card to you. ■Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not 1. ❑ Addressee's Address �? d ermit. ■ rite'Retum Receipt Requested' on the mailpiece below the article number. d 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery N 5 1 !C ■ e Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date i elivered. .- Consult postmaster for fee. a 3 Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number 0 Z 306 461 219 C I,', E Colgate Design Corp. 4b. Service Type };-� c/o Southland Corp. ❑ Registered. CN Certified °C Att Ad Valorem Tax ❑ Express Mail ❑ • Insured S ¢ P.O-:: Box 711 ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD 0 c Dallas, TX 75221-9867 7. Date of Delivery ZOR 131S98 5. Recei a By: (Print N e) B. Addressee's Address (Only if requested W and fee is paid) ix g 6. Sig to ddre ee o n !, o i f� PS Fohn 3811, December 1994 102595-97-B-0179 Domestic Return Receipt PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 315 W estphaliaRoaci P.O. Box 483 Mattituck, New York 11952 Southold Town Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Att: Ms. Linda Kowalski Dear Linda: Tel: (516) 298-5629 Fax: (516) 298-5664 March 13, 1998 RE: Riverhead Building Supply Corp. Application Hearing Date: March 23, 1998 Enclosed please find an additional return receipt card for the Affidavit of Mailing for the above referenced matter. Very truly yours, ;; SENDER: �ia C. Moore v ■ Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. II 0) ■Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b. I also Wish to receive the H ■ Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this following services (for an d card to you, extra fee): ■A" h h' > ac tis form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not permit. 1. ❑ Addressee's Address ° ai ■Write'Refurn Receipt Requested' on the mailpiece below the article number. ■The etum Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date 2 11 Restricted Delivery deli y c ° ered. 3. A icle Addressed to: Consult postmaster for fee. a 4a. Article Number d riftwood Cove Co. Owners Inc. Z 306 461 218 c cE c/(j, Lewis Edson 4b. Service Type 5 U, P • Q :- Box 1526 ❑ Registered Certified 1] occ Southold, NY 11971 ElExpress Mail ElInsured c I G ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD a z 7. Date of Delivery o` � LU 5. Received By: (Print Name) �OVTHO� 8. Addressee' Add ess (Only ifNque ed and fee is aid) c 6. SXIr �ddresse or n MAR 12 1990 � PS Form 3811, December 1994 102595-97-e-0179 me. ' - P rn 0 -- —4- L. 1 BOARD OF APPEALS:TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -----------------------------------x In the Matter of the Application of Riverhead Building Supply Corp. (Name of Applicants) ------------------------------------ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING AND POSTING I, Margaret Rutkowski, residing at Mattituck, NY New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: 1) On the 10th day of March , 199 8 , I personally mailed, by certified mail, return receipt requested, a true copy of the attached Legal Notice, addressed to. each of the following named persons at' the addresses set opposite their respective names, that the addresses listed below are those shown on the current assess- ment rolls of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at ; the United States Post Office to each name below certified' mail, return receipt requested attach post office receipts here) : Name of Surrounding Property Owner Mailing Address Thomas Jurzenia & wf 675 Silvermere Road, Greenport, NY 11944 New York Telephone Co. 38th Fl., 1095 Avenue of the Americas, NY, NY 10036 Philip & Patricia Marcario 2878 N. Wading River Rd., Wading River, NY 11792 Driftwood Cove Co. Owners Inc. c/o Lewis Edson P.O. Box 1526, Southoold, NY 11971 . Robert Brown P.O. Box 2050, Greenport, NY 11944 Colgate Design Corp. c/o Southland Corp., P.O. Box 711, Dallas, TX 75221-9867 Anne Marie Nelson c/o Bank of NY Trust Co., 701 Brickell Ave., 11th F1:, Miami, FL 33131 and, 2) On the day of I personally posted the subject property identified as District 1000, Section , Block , Lot by placing the Town's official poster ten (10) feet, or closer, from the property line facing the street or facing the right-of-way, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven full days prior to the subject hearing date, which is _ J'�G��er � • Sworn to before me this (signature) 12t of -March, .1998 PATRICIA C. M 00RE otary Public Nof Now York Su olk CountyPubllNo 4961668 Commission Expires June 16, _L2.99 **Please return to the office of the Board of Appeals when ccmpleted. (Town Hall hours are 8 - 4 p.m.) '.hank you. I BOARD OF APPEALS:TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -----------------------------------x In the Matter of the Application of AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING Riverhead Building Supply Corp. (Name of Applicants) ------------------------------------ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) I, Patricia C. Moore , residing at Southold, NY New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: 1) On the day of , 199 I personally mailed, by certified mail, return receipt requested, a true copy of the, attached Legal Notice, addressed to each of the following named persons at' the addresses set opposite their respective names, that the addresses listed below are those shown on the current assess- ment rolls of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office to each name below certified mail, return receipt requested (attach post office receipts here) : Name of Surrounding Property Owner Mailing Address and, 2) On the 10th day of March, _.199.8 I personally posted the subject property identified as District 1000, Section 46 , Block 1 , Lot 1 & 2..001, by placing the Town's official poster ten (10) feet, or closer, from the property line facing the street or facing the right-of-way, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven full days prior to the subject hearing date, which is March. 23,,, .1998 1______2.1 "In, Sworn to before me this v (signature) 12th aay OL . March,. -I-998 MARGARETC. RUTKOYI;;KI C . - Notary Public, State of Nobs Ynrlt 46�Public fVo.4982528 Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Expires June 3,19 11 —Please return to the office of the Hoard of Appeals when ccmD_ leted. J (Town Hall hours are 8 - 4 p.m.) Thank you. � PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 315 Westphalia Road P.O. Box 483 Mattituck, New York 11952 Tel: (516) 298-5629 Fax: (516) 298-5664 March 12, 1998 Southold Town Board of Appeals 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Att: Ms. Linda Kowalski RE: Riverhead Building Supply Corp. Application Hearing Date: March 23, 1998 Dear Linda: Enclosed please find completed Affidavit of Mailing with postmarked receipts from the post office and two of the return receipt cards for the above referenced matter. Also enclosed is the completed Affidavit of Posting for this matter. Vermy yours, atricia C. Moore PCM/mr Encls. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman James Dinizio, Jr. Lydia A. Tortora Lora S. Collins George Horning MEMORANDUM BOIARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTfiOLD TO: Planning Board FROM: G. Goehringer, ZBA Chairman DATE: March 4, 1998 SUBJECT: Riverhead Building Supply Project Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ZBA Fax (516) 765-9064 Telephone (516) 765-1809 We have received inquiries with regard to Route 25 in the area of the above project, Moore's Lane, 7-11, and other business/industrial uses, and whether or not information was requested about the frequency of trailer trucks entering, exiting, loading and unloading as well as other vehicles. Attorney Patricia Moore, as agent for the � applicant, furnished a copy of the SEQRA determination of non -significance for this project today, and there is no indication whether the traffic issues were addressed or requested by the Planning Board as lead agency for consideration. The Board of Appeals hearing regarding the building width and fence height will be held on March, 23, 1998. We would like to provide the Planning Board with an opportunity to furnish comments to us under the site plan pending for a 115 ft:' wide building and 8 -ft. fence height. Also, please furnish reasons supporting your comments (or site plan preference) with respect to these site planning considerations, and with respect to the paragraph above. \X� Thank you. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. j' Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD cin Z 1 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF; SOUTHOLD r �S; ate Environmental Quality Review i'_ �ll NEGATIVE DECLARATION V� Notice1of Determination Non -Significant Au ustl1, 1997 Town Hall, 53095 Main I P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11! Fak (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-19 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as jead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed site plan for Riverhead Building Supply SCTM#: 1000-46-1-2.1 Location: Main Rd., Greenport SEAR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: This proposed site plan is for the construction of a 50,425 square foot lumber yard supply building. s '` 4/ "J e PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD August 12, 1997 Patricia Moore, Esq. P.O. Box 483 Mattituck, NY 11952 ���SUFFO(,1=co � Gy� 0 cn O 1 z � pA-VDD OFFICE TOyVIV F SOUTHOLD z6� U Re: Proposed site plan for Riverhead Building Supply SCTM# 1000-46-1-2.1 Dear Ms. Moore: Town Hall, 53095 Mair P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 1 Fax (516) 765-313 Telephone (516) 765 - The following resolution, was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, August 11, 1997: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency makes a determination of non -significance, and grants a Negative Declaration. - Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman enc. z 1. Page 2 SEQR Negative Declaration -Riverhead Building Supply August 11, 1997 Reasons Supporting This Determination: This project involves the construction of a 50,425 square foot lumber yard supply building. A variance application is before the Board of Appeals for building width. The building width must be approved by the, Board of Appeals before site plan approval. A full environmental impact statement was reviewed by the town's consultant in conjunction with the zone change application to the Town Board. A lumber yard supply building is a permitted use in this.Light Industrial Park/Planned Office Park (LIO), thus the proposed action is consistent with zoning.- An oning.An Environmental Assessment Form has !been submitted and reviewed, and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. There has not been any correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no. comments or objections from that agency. The applicant will have to comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) and all relevant standards of water supply and sewage disposal systems.. Design and flow specification, subsurface soil conditions and site plan details will have to be approved by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). This impact is not considered significant due to the anticipated project compliance with established requirements of the SCSC and the SCDHS and the required relevant permits. - For Further Information: . ' Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 cc: John P. Cahill, DEC Albany Suffolk County Dept. of Health Suffolk County Water Authority New York State Dept. of Transportation Judith Terry, Town Clerk Suffolk County Dept. ofIPublic Works Southold Town Building Dept. Applicant 13u,Lbi tis Wiow- rent � µEiGN-r NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, concerning this property. OWNER(S) OF RECORD: �iVeRt+EAD�UIL/D�►YE� �uPPty DATE -OF PUBLIC HEARING: b MbAl. AleC14 23 Iq PW m q If you have an interest in this project, you are invited to view the Town file(s). which are available for inspection prior to the day of the hearing during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. BOARD OF APPEALS •TOWN OF SOUTHOLD (516) 765-1809 \rm*JAM&_S lllA- IR02r'_ I A h,,- Xk i A NOTICE OF HEARINGS SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY, MAY 14, 1998 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the Code of the Town of Southold, the following applications will be held for public hearings by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS, at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971, on THURSDAY, MAY 14, 1998 at the time noted below (or as soon thereafter as possible) : 6:45 p.m. Appl. No, 4565 - STEVEN ZUHOSKI . Variance under Article XXIV, Section 100-244, based upon the Building Inspector's March 30, 1998. Notice of Disapproval . for a proposed garage addition with an insufficient side yard setback at property known as 1090 Gold Spur Street, Cutchogue; 1000-95-4-18.12. 6:50 p.m. Appl. No. 4566 - FRANK BER.TETTO. Variance under Article XXIV, Section 100-244B, based upon the Building Inspector's April 7, 1998 Notice of Disapproval for an "as* built" garage addition. Pending building permit No. 24632Z was issued 2/3/98. Location of Property: 695 Shore Drive, Greenport; 1000-47-2-18. 6:55 p.m. Appl. No. 4564 - BAYVIEW/SOUTH HARBOR, L.P. Variance under Article III, Section 100-33, based upon the February 10, 1998 Notice of Disapproval issued by the Building Inspector, to locate a proposed accessory garage in an R-80 Zone District in an area other Page 2 - Legal Notic . Hearings for May 14, i998 Southold Town Board of Appeals than the required rear yard. Location of Property: Along the easterly Side of South Harbor Road (also extending; near the end of Grange Road), Southold; 1000-75-4-22.6 (formerly parcel of 22.4) . it 7:00 p.m. Carryover Hearings from March 23, 1998: T. PETIKAS. Proposed two-family use on a.'21,000+- sq. ft. parcel in this R-40 Residential Zone District. Location of Property: Corner of . the Westerly Side of Sound Road and the Northerly Side of North Road (C. R. 48) (a/k/a Northerly End of Main Street) , Greenport; 1000-35-1-8, which requires approval from the Board of Appeals for -the following: a) Special Exception Application No. 4525 as provided by Article III -A, Section 100-30A.2 for a two-family use/ and b) Variance Application'' No. 4526 as provided under Section 100-31A.3 for the reason that the substandard lot size of 21,483 sq. ft. does ' not conform to the requirements for a two-family dwelling use in this R-40 Zone District; and c) fence in excess of four -ft: height limitation within or along front yard areas, based upon the building inspector's Tebruary 10, 1998 Notice of Disapproval, Article XXIII, Section 100-231. l` 7:10 p.m. Appl. . No. 4560 - ROBERT AND. ANN SHANK. (Carryover hearing from April 16, 1998 for continuation) . . 820 Fisherman's ' Beach Road, Cutchogue; 1000-111-1-19.1. 7:25 p.m. Appl. No. 4547 - RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY. This is a request for a variance based upon the Building Inspector's January- 2, 1998 Notice of Disapproval which reads as follows: Page 3 - Legal Noti( Hearings for May 14, 1998 Southold Town Board of. Appeals "...1) the proposed structure being located in an LIO District is permitted to have a maximum of 60 feet of frontage on one street. The proposed building is. approximately 115 feet facing Rt. 25, Article XIII, Section 100-133C; 2) When fences are located in or along side and rear yards, they shall not exceed 6-1/2 feet in height, pursuant to 100-231B...." : Location of Property: 74610 and 74500 Main Road, Greenport, NY; 1000-46-1-1 and 2.1, combined as a single lot., The Board of Appeals will at said time' and . place hear any and all persons or representatives desiring to be heard in the above applications or desiring to submit written statements before the end of each hearing. The hearing will not start" earlier than designated. The file is available for review during regular Town Hall business hours (8-4 p.m.) . If you have questions, please do not hesitate to call 765-1809. Dated: April 20, 1998. BY ORDER :OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, Chairman by Linda Kowalslfl 7:10 p.m. Carryover Hearing from March 23, 1998: RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY CO. OFFICE OF BOARD OF APPEALS 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 (1-516) 765.-1809 tel. (1-516) 765-9064 fax. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++.....++++++++++1111+++++++++++++1111+++- March 6, 1998 Re: ZBA Application Hearing Date: Monday, March 23, 1998 Dear Sir or Madam: For your records, please find enclosed a copy of the Legal Notice which will be published by our office in the upcoming issue of the L.I. Traveler newspaper. Under the requirements of Chapter 58 of Town Law, we are requesting that you send a copy of this Notice ' at this time by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the all surrounding; property owners. Please include a copy of a map or sketch describing the 'setbacks and building(s) with your mailings and your telephone, number. These mailings must be postmarked by 3/11 if possible, and be forwarded to all owners, as listed on the Town Assessment records, of vacant , or improved lands across streets and along all sides abutting the boundaries of the subject lot. Please also post the enclosed Poster in the location described by A Ch. 58 of the Code (that is, within ten (10) feet of the front property line facing the street, for a. period of not less than seven (7) days) . The sign may not be posted later than 3/15. If the sign is torn or removed due to adverse weather conditions, let us know and we will provide another. Please return the Affidavit of Mailing with the white certified mail receipts (postmarked by the post office) for our file prior to the hearing Page 2 - Instruction Le, Meeting of March 23, 1998 Southold Town Board of Appeals date by mail or in person. The return receipt green cards may be returned at the hearing (or before) . If you have questions, please feel free to call. Very truly yours, Linda Kowalski Board Secretary Enclosures AS400/1nag.98/app1.1n n r NOTICE OF HEARINGS as soon thereafter as possible) : 7:40 SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS BUILDING SUPPLY. MONDAY, MARCH 23, 1998 variance based upon the NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the Code of the Town of Southold, the following application will be held for public hearing by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS, at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971, on MONDAY, MARCH 23, 1998 at the time noted below (or as soon thereafter as possible) : 7:40 p.m. Appl. No. 4547 - RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY. This is a request for a variance based upon the Building Inspector's January 2, 1998 Notice of Disapproval which reads as follows: "... 1) the proposed structure being located in an LIO District is permitted to have a maximum of 60 feet of frontage on one street. The proposed building is approximately 115 feet facing Rt. 25, Article XIII, Section 100-133C; 2) When fences are located in or along side and rear yards, they shall not exceed 6-1/2 feet in height, pursuant to 100-231B ....11 Location of Property: 74610 and 74500 Main Road, Greenport, NY; 1000-46-1-1 and 2.1, combined as a single lot. The Board of Appeals will at said time and place hear any and all persons or representatives desiring to be heard in the above application or desiring to submit written statements before the end of each hearing. The hearing will not start earlier than designated. The file y Page 2 - Legal Notice Regular Meeting of March 23, 1998 Southold Town Board of Appeals is available for review during regular Town Hall business hours (8-4 p.m.) . If you have questions, please do not hesitate to call 765-1809. Dated: March 6, 1998. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD, OF APPEALS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, Chairman by Linda Kowalski buildinil g, permit No. Drive;;Greenpori rJ000-47;-2- 11 icoaa.�a►5v,ca�vuuwg=-ucaa;,.ug ead of Gfange Road);Southold; .10000; 75-4.-22.6 (tbrmerly.par- P-. -- ariyoX(r:Hearings fro`m�MarchZ3;�1.998�:;fi2�;�--: =;:T:l?ETIKAS: Proposed; 21two; - familv;use,on,a;,000+ sq;i.t. . erty: ;Corner., of;;the-. Westerly Side,;of� Sound_Road and the Northerly, .,Side; of;:North', Road. , (CwR:8)i(a/Ida Northerly,End - of*Main'. Street�;,�Greenport; - 1.0;00=35,1=8; which require5.ap- proval for;ttie Board. ofAppeals fortho=followijtig :;•��; ���;:;,�._• a): Special Exceptiori,Applica tion No,;;4525. &,provide&by,. ,Articler>I.II=A,�� Section�=i:00-• 3M.'2 fora. twb=family;use/oc cupancy; and=s �-*­Variatice:A�p--plical ori'No. 4526,as provided under -Section 100-31A.3 for the reas6filliat_the substandard- lots isize?•of;=21,483 sq:;ft.,,doesziiot,conf6r.m-to the requirements; for,'a: two;. amrl . 7dWellinguse-in- this{:R-40- Zon� `Distridt'' `.1�.^%':. . �c)ifence::in�.excess offour=-ft.. hei&jimitation within ofalong . . front,yard-aieas;liasediip6ndhe . 10;1998, NoticeM-Disapprovai;, AAickDa1II;'Secti6n 100,-2,3'1.!-,.. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK ss: Patricia C. Lollot, being duly sworn, says that she is the Production Coordinator, of the TRAV- ELER WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the no- tice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in said Traveler Watchman o . .. nce each . . week for ..................................................:................ weeks successively, co mencing on the .. ............... dao............ ...�.......... ........... .191V Y ..��....�...�.....^..... ....:.................................. Sworn to before me this ......... :r� .......:`day of ...................... %, - ............................... 19 ,../Q Notary Public BARBARA A. SCHNEIDER NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New York No. 4806846 Qualified in Sutfoik'Caen Commission Expires .NOTICE OF HEARINGS SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS MONDAY, MARCH 23, 1998 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the Code of the Town of Southold, the following application will be held for public hearing by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS, at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971, on MONDAY, MARCH 23, 1998 at the time noted below (or as soon thereafter as possible) : 7:40 p.m. Appl. No. 4547 - RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY. This is a request for a variance based upon the Building Inspector's January 2, 1998 Notice of Disapproval which reads as follows: "...1) the proposed structure being located in an LIO District is permitted to have a maximum of 60 feet of frontage on one street. The proposed building is approximately 115 feet facing Rt. 25, Article XIII, Section 100-133C; 2) When fences are located in or along side and rear yards, they shall not exceed 6-1/2 feet in height, pursuant to 100-231B...." Location of Property: 74610 and 74500 Main Road, Greenport, NY; 1000-46-1-1 and 2.1, combined as a single lot. The Board of Appeals will at said time and place hear any and all persons or representatives desiring to be heard in the above application or desiring to submit written statements before the end of each hearing. The hearing will not start earlier than designated. The file Page 2 - Legal Notic_ Regular Meeting of March 23, 1998 Southold Town Board of Appeals is available for review during regular Town Hall business hours (8-4 p.m.). If you have questions, please do not hesitate to call 765-1809. Dated: March 6, 1998. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, Chairman by Linda Kowalski SOUTHOLD TOWN. BOARD OF APPEALS %,.­MA-RCH_13-'-1998;1­ HEREBYY iIV•EN; pursuant to Section267 )f•the .Town. Law. andAhe Code sf - the Town of Southold,- the bllowing. applications' will be seld'for public;hearing'by the 'OUTHOLD TOWN. BOARD )F APPEALS;at the -Southold Cown Hall,'53095 Main Road; iouthold, New,York-11971; on. vIONDAY MARCH, 23, 1998 it the. times noted below. (or as *on thereafter as-Ossible)`.' 6:35: p,m _'Appl•:',�No. 4550- ItUTH MILLER.'Tliis. is'aAr l guest fora Vaiiancelasecl upon. :he Building I ispector's;Jani Ory 26, 1998 Notice pf Disapproval :o locate, a proposed dwel - . 1. d` :lit!on with reduction, in total side , yards.- Location of Property:. 54.00 :; Indian :;Neck ':Road,: Peconic;'County Parce11000-867 7-2:2:::;:x: ,:. •.,�:::�:,.:. ,,r . : 6:40- p.m! App1. No.'4549 CAROL •':arid' ANTHONY' LOSOUADRO` :`JR•'' `AND` DONALb-'TUTHILL...•fVari I. arice'basi d;iZpon,ari;applicati`on to erect" a' corral,to.,an.existing:; barn,, and Febivary,43, 1998.; Notice of;;Dis.wh approvat-ich reads "...horses,.shall not, -bet: housed. within forty (40) •feet ofp any lotline:�Artidle I11; Section/ 100-3.1 C(8);: and Notice of Dis- approval dated February 1-8, `Article' III;' Section 100- 1998; 31 A2(fi); that'ttie-,vacaq.propeity -; t located%n`a�eiieral�Bi%srrress (B) - district, re10, quiresacres or,more :; for, keeping 6�fi4ses, Article IIIc Section,100-31A-z(b).••"-(Also, ref.:Sections.100-101•A-�1. and:! 100-i01C.) Applicant's are pro- posing corral,loca6n; Vicluding. existing barn,- for, -Up. to • two horses °as` an' accessory' to their residence'of6rol and Anthony Losq 1'ocated Yat X28 5 5 Boisseau Avenue,` Southold, NY; Parcel„100'0-5,-5=12.L A porti6n'•of'the corral/feiicrtig `,•.,,;,•.; would extend':onto:a portion of v vacaiitl.prop,etty .of,_D?naId/b Tuthill;. ki}own as -3125 �Boissezfin j Avenu_ e�S'outhbld=,'`1000=55-5'=' `6,:45`.poh pP� 'No;, 45'S3 '= �:i CHESTER ORI'OW SKI. Tlisis ` ; a requestJ0f , ,a'ya iance�:based :; upon the Burldipg;�sPeci”-; j, February;20,-1998Notrceof!Dts :-, approval. or. thei;pioposed 41W oftw000w�rudnws-with taining a:-,nonVcoirformrng- use , Article,;XXI;`Sectioii��100- I'S.:UMain':.;Road, •-. Cutchoguer �QO,QjA7, frl 14;'` 6:50: p.m.. Appt: f4o... 4552-. GEORGE LIVANO'S. ,T'his is -a upon . the, Building: Inspector's February• 11,.11499ffi, Notice •o Disapproval,-Artiele'IIlA;` Secy; tion' 100'-30A',A;, fora reduction ' in tlie proposedsideyard setback at a• corner portion -'of proposed ac ce4ory`buildirig.(garage). Lot. Size andZone:.7500j+= sct_ f£;iR- 402one:,District,_ Location; of:,; Property; .555'Sound:Beach Drive; Mattituek; also known as-.. Estate; 1000-49-1-23. 5 P., III pl: No:,4Q68- ELEANOR __EVERNICH. ' This -is. A.carryover; hearing re- garding arequest k6r variances) in this pending division project (proposed ,two lots), _,Article XXIII; Section 100 239'and Ar iicle.IIL'Section:100-32; as to. totat-Iot size.in this,R-90'Zone/ District:; Location of Property: 3200.Cox•Neck Road; Mattituck; 1000=113=8 5 containing 161, 997 sq. . ':00 p•rn, 'App I..No.,, 455'1- KAYLA B. STOTSKY:. This , a. request for a,.Variance,.based upon; the building, inspector's February •9, 1998 Notice of pis - approval; Article XXIII; Section 100=23'1-A: Applicant is propos- ing a fence at a height n. excess of four feet along thefront yard area (right-cifline) at_ 3.35 'Osprey:1est Road, Greenport; 1:000•-35,6;33,; also known as Lot #§,•Section I, Map of Cleaves point. ; , ;,t•- : ; ..:7:05 p.m-. iAPpl,,,No•,4548= JEFFREYWORTHINGTON::; �D This: is'areque.sf for a varianee�\ based'' upon• .'e^'Bu'il'ding inspector's.' January' 20,,'.1998" Notice'of Disapproval'' to. ;c'on-. struct an,accessory buildug'(ga rage) ,on the- "as built" founda tion, which: is- located in' a, side yard area, Article III -A, Section 100-33.' Location of Property:: 1025 'Uh, - 'Creek •Drive, Southold,"' 1000-55=328; •also. known'as•-Lot3`l2 ,Map --of Yenne.cott Park.:` ,pm:'ITHEODORE MARIA PET-IKAS.;., Thi's.:is :a request:for•.a,two, family usezat the;corner:of w/s SOAnd;Road , and? n/s,Main or. North. Road. (C.R: 48); Greenport, -1'000-35,b 1•=8; ;which requires, approval . 14o frordthe-Board-of Appeals for the -'following:- '• '`; ' : "'""'�''` ""Hist `'a-` Special. Eide 'ti `Qnf'A 'Appl" T , p ,P.,., . cation N.o.; 4525,as:pzoyde;liy' ` c,.•,... Article IIT -A,, SectiQri 1 OV-,, Q :2.. fora two -f amily:use/occupancy; ;i -;b) Variance: Application No:• 4'5264s'provided under Section. l ooi34A-:3;foii-tlie.reasondih ft the. substandard lot siie of21;483-sq. :. "! ft. does-Jnbf corifoYrm'to-''ttie re- quireme�t's foc aat"w'o ;family Dis,X and`.:,,;', 1;':c�,f�nce rn,excess,9f,.�our Ji;t: height,linlitatio_rE 'rthin oF• along front yard,ai?a� �?�.ed;ppvn the. building spect9es Febr•gary.d0; _i4gi_ i2o"f Disapproval, eArr: trcleXXIII Sectiori'100=231,70. 7:40',p iiir �-Ap'P1. No 4547_ RIVERH'EAD SUILDTNG SUPPLY:'his..isa`request fpi a variance based.updiithe Build - i &Inspec,tor's{hJai p`ary:2•;,;1X98 Notice:o�f.iDisalipzQyal;;wliich posed structure being>locatecl in an LIO; District,.:isr petmitted to. have a-m'aximum of-'60:-feet'of fr6ntage'6n one -street: The'pro=- pose"d buildirig'is approximately 11`$, feet'facing• Rt.' 25', Article XIII; Se,tion'100'-1330;;',2): When fences; are''located. in: or along side _arid ;Fear yards,. they shall notjpxceedf6%.:fegt,i,n; height, pursuant to ,100-231 B;.;'., COUNTY OF _FFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK ss: Patricia C. Lollot, being duly sworn, says that she is the Production Coordinator, of the TRAV- ELER WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the no- tice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in said Traveler Watchman once each week for / .......... .............................................................. weeks successively, commencing on the .....�h y e .................................................................... Sworn to before me this...... ..... ..............day of M RRc19. H ................... .95 ................. ......................................................... Notary Public BARBARA A SCHNEIDER NOTARY PUBUC, State of New York No. 4806M Qualified in Suffolk -County / Commission Expires Location of Er6perty:,74610 and 74500 MairiRoad; Greeripoit,� NY; 100046-1-1 and'2:1, com- :::.bided as=a siriglelot..rtw° _' The Board of Appals will at - said time arid_place hear any and all persons `or.rep'resenfatives desiring to bep heard in the above :applications•or_desinAg,to sub mit written•statements bnfore the end, of -each.-hearing: The:hears ing will not stat earlier --than des_ ignated: The file is -available for review' during'Town'Hall busi= mess hours'(8, 'plui.) Ifyou have tiestioiis' I'ease do not hesitate to„call_765.A 809• . - . ._;i,Dated: MV Ycti 6; 1998-,'; ; By;ORDER;OF THE . ::,:: ,; :�,:w>,SOUTHOL:D;TOWN• f' i "BOARD;OF APPEALS vv� .. ;;;_ :.•:: GERARD-P./ GOEHRINGER `Chaff -in By: Linda Kowalski 1X=3%12/98(51) I N OFFICE OF BOARD OF APPEALS Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 (1-516) 765-1809 tel. (1-516) 765-9064 fax. February 20, 1998 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. Moore & Moore P.O. Box 483 Matti tuck, NY 11952 Re: Appl. No. 4547 - Riverhead Building Supply Dear Mrs. -+Moore: This will confirm that the above application is pending and under review by the board members. In the interim, please furnish: ,,k (a) the additional sets (6) of the site plan map which have not 9Y -,-been delivered; b) two sets of the building diagram or construction plans; (c) copies of communications. from the Planning Board indicating the latest development regarding site plan elements and whether or not additional .information has been requested under the site plan process. if the above maps are received by Thursday, March 5, 1998, we will be in a position to advertise the application for a March hearing. In the event they ar\e received after March 5, 1998, the hearing would be carried over to",,the next Regular Meeting inspections calendar and hearing calendar. Very truly yours, Gerard P. Goehringer Chairman r 5,J PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 315 Westphalia Road P.O. Box 483 Mattituck, New York 11952 Tel: (516) 298-5629 Fax: -(516)298-5664 Margaret Rutkowski Secretary February 25, 1998 Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals FEB 61998 Mr. Goehringer, Chairman Southold Town Hall �� 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Appeal No. 4547 Riverhead Building Supply Dear Chairman and Board of Appeals: In response to your February 20, 1998„letter, I have enclosed the following communications from the Southold Town Planning Board: 1. July 11, 1997 letter from Greenport Fire Department. Riverhead Building Supply Response to their questions: A. The Building will comply with all National Fire Prevention Association standards and New'York State Fire Codes. (The Building Department has reviewed the construction plans and has verbally approved same for code compliance). B. The building will have sprinklers. 2. August 13, 1997 letter from the State of New York Department of Transportation for information: The DOT has, since the date of this letter, accepted the plans on Nov. 4, 1997 (Case # 97-139). Also enclosed are the following: an additional six set of site plan maps, and two sets of the building diagram or construction plans. Thank you for your anticipated scheduling the hearing for March. If you have any questions, or request any additional documents, please do not hesitate to contact me. - Very truly yours, (:atricia C. Moore cc: Allen.M. Smith, Esq. Riverhead Building Supply Donald Denis, Architect PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD August 29, 1997 Patrica Moore Esq. 315 Westphalia Road Mattituck, NY 411952 PI ANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RE: Riverhead Building and Supply Main Road, Greenport SCTM# 1000-46-1-2.1 i Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 Dear Mrs. Moore, i The Planning Board has received the enclosed letters from the New York State Department of Transportation and the Greenport Fire Chief. They are being sent to you for your information and response. If you have any questions, or need additional information, please contact this office. �Yer Y. c9 i' o tibe t Kassnee Site Plan Reviewer Encls : cc: Greenport Fire Chief CHIEF WARREN JENSEN 1sT ASST. THOMAS R. WATKINS Sr. 2N0 ASST. WAYDE T. MANWARING TREAS. K. LANGONE SECRETARY C. CAPRISE CHAPLAIN C. KUMJIAN July 11, 1997 Organized 1845 �,.. Pb E.Mall - gre�enpport-id@juno.com (516) 477-9801 - STATION 1 (516) 477-1943 - CHIEFS OFFICE (516) 477-4012 - FAX/MESS P.O. BOX 58 THIRD STREET GREENPORT, NY 11944 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Southold Town Planning Board PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Riverhead Building Supply, SCTM# 46.-1-2.1 Dear Mr. Orlowski: I have reviewed the enclosed site plan and recommend that this meet all National Fire Prevention Assocition standards and New York State Fire Codes. In addition, I would like to request that all fire flows meet Insurance Services Office Inc. standards. I am also interested in knowing whether or not this building will be fire - sprinkled. Sincerelv�� Warren J se `- Chief WJ:cc At 14 1997 �; J tn��rld 30ju!" CRAIG :NRACtISA, P.E. ACTING REGIONAL DIRECTOR August ',3, 1 997 Mr. Robert G. Kassncr Southold Planning; Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1 179 ' Southold, New York 11971 STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OFFICE BUILDING 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11766-5516 Riverhead 13uildinla Stag ly Route 25 Greenport JOSEPH H. BOARDMAN COMMISSIONER Dear Mr. Kassner: We have reviewed the Environmental Assessment Form for the referenced proposed reconstruction. We concur that the Southold Planning; Board should assume SE'QR lead agency status. The State has no construction pr()jccis scheduled in this location in our five year planning program. For highway work hermit information, please have the developer contact V. Lena at 952-6020. For other information you may contact G. l3cierling at 952-6128. '17iank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal. very truly yours, MIC IIAEA, A'LI?R Planning & Program Management vq 1 r• AUG 19 1997 �. _......._....s`'t.r`�iaf'iii!'; ;ttir•1�{;.,... ,.... X '00A P AT Rt, I A C, ; N' k\ Ahmonq M [il)'Ve 115 16 Fax: (516) 29fzAe:6'4 ...... ..... ..... .... .... ...... ... ... .... FEB 2, 5 Vabrvary 240 Towna Zoning C,,, ard of Goehringer, clhiirx�ai,� SvUtAold Town Hall 53095 XaJj6n Rdad Soutboldi NY 11571 Rez Hy4y Harbpr C'Mab., U Pdvdlx�,hoadf, wm.� �i 4547 Doan.- Linda-, Hav 5%rb"qK wer FA'x,Iwj, s*-xrvc�,� will, beg! providil* 6 wx"Ittc-'A d . r, Oft, proposed front and so We Vat* wAriit-ten deescription. 040 It 0. you aa Soo X1 d 'M P, J;J. ijA Y, 6 last board. hoaw-IA 'T A,t th rovi-,7,7 oi your MZ '-ta"86-yo yo; i" "h P% yoktr ri-10- 01. of 2 the Q The plano, wAillLI I Will reVietj advise you of sal0e. If you knave any pl$400 do not hesititto- -"0 - 4.", �'yoq clh C, Moore PATRICIA C. MOORE Attomey at Law 315 Westphalia Road P.O. Box 483 Mattituck, New York 11952 Tel: (516) 298-5629 Fax: (516) 298-5664 Margaret Rutkowski Secretary February 3, 1998 Southold Town Zoning Board of.Appeals Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Riverhead Building Supply Corp., Dear Linda: Enclosed please find the following: 1. An application for a variance from the width requirements of pursuant to Town Code Section 100-133, as well as a variance for. the fence height. 2. SEQRA - Short Environmental Form 3. Transactional Disclosure Form 4. original -signed and sealed drawings prepared by Donald Denis, Architect of the site plan (Si), elevations (Al), internal layout (A2) and the map submitted to the Town Board for the Zoning application that provides the location of the existing buildings and property lines (RZ1). Mr. Denis will be away until next week. Therefore, I have submitted one complete set of drawings. Upon Mr. Denis's return I can provide the board with as many sets as you need. Also enclosed -is a Riverhead Building Supply check in the amount of $550.00 for the application fees. If there is anything else the board needs please do not hesitate to contact me. Uery truly yours, ��atricia C. Moore cc: Allen Smith, Esq., Riverhead Building Supply Corp. ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Zoning Board of Appeals i Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 FR9rJI: Office of the Town Clerk DATE: February 9, 1998 - RE: ZONING APPEAL APPL— NO. 4547 - RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY \ Transmitted herewith is ZONING APPEAL APPL. NO. 4547 - RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY together with the Short Environmental Assessment Forms the Applicant Transactional Disclosure Form, the Notice of Disapproval from the Building Department, a letter from Patricia C. Moore to Town Attorney, Laury Dowd, a copy of the Application for Building Permit and a Disclosure form from William D. Moore. Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE, TOWN CLERK RECEIPT 68217 Town of Southold 19 C (i Southold, New York 11971 DATE �(�r 7 Phone: 167651800 550Gb $" NED OF: n n 1i i l—r FOR: ❑ CASH BY: Cd �hECK # o� 9_3 - Reason for Appeal Continued Zoning Board of Appeals re: Riverhead Building Supply Corp. Pursuant to Town Law section 267b-3, the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals is to analyze and asses the personal benefits anticipated by the applicant against the potentially deleterious effects that a grant of the relief requested would have on the health, safety and welfare of the effected neighborhood or community. In performing this balancing'test, the Zoning Board is charged with the responsibility to consider the five factors enumerated in Town Law Section 267b -3(b). The variance should be granted for the following reasons: 1. No undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, if the variance is granted. A. Riverhead Building Supply Corp acquired the 315 acre parcel, and obtained a change of zone from the Southold Town Board to LIO zoning use district. The purposes of the change of zone and acquisition were to develop the existing 2.2 acre Riverhead Building Supply Corp parcel with preexisting nonconforming structures and adjacent 3.5 acre parcel into a full service facility. The Planning Board reviewed the proposal and proposed site plan and recommended the change of zone with the following comments: "1. The proposed change of zone is to permit better use and design of the existing Riverhead Supply. site. The Company proposed a state of the art operation that will include a pick up and pay, drive thru lumber building." 2. "The HD designated property (3.5 acres) is less than ideal for residential housing as it is located behind the 7-11 store and next to the tracks and the LIO zone. Further, its small size and poor location prohibits adequate buffering of a dense residential use from commercial uses to the north and west." B. The Planning Board's review of the proposal considered the character of the neighborhood and impact on nearby properties. The change of zone was considered and granted with the proposed plan as is before the Zoning Board. ' C. The proposed structures will be in conformity with the New York State Fire Prevention and Building Code, and Handicap Accessibility laws. The proposed structures will enhance the character of the commercial area. D. The proposed structure will be a significant investment in the Town - of Southold, and any impact on the character of the neighborhood by the proposed width of the building will be mitigated by the site plan compliance. E. .The front of the building will contain the retail sales and business office which is designed in character with the new development in this district. The back of the building will be warehouse (covered storage of building materials). A single complex will replace the preexisting nonconforming structures located on the parcel. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant can not be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The developing technology for building supply facilities make this investment economically necessary. The existing facility is less economically viable in its present condition, it is anticipated that the proposed modern facility will continue the prosperity of the business on the east end and continue to provide jobs in the community. With regard to the arbitrary 60 foot width requirement in the Southold Town Code, the code disregards the setback requirements in the LIO district, does not distinguish between a two acre parcel and the subject 5.7 acre parcel, and does not address the different uses in the applicable zoning districts. The proposed use is within a single structure; the warehouse portion of the structure will provide for covered storage of building materials and a state-of-the-art building supply center. A vehicle drives through the warehouse, loads the first quality material from the stacks to the contractor's vehicles and then payment is made at the exit. Such a use can not be accomplished in a 60 foot wide structure. With regard to the fence height, an 8 foot security fence is located on this parcel and would be extended to secure the entire parcel as shown on the site plan. The 8 foot high fence is for the protection of the public as well as to secure the material. 3. The area variance is not substantial The application of the balancing test weighs in favor of the grant of the variance. A 325 foot wide parcel in a LIO district requires 30 foot side yards (60' total) therefore the building could be as much as 265 feet in width given the side yard setbacks in the Bulk Schedule. A 60 foot wide building is unreasonable, the property should be developed through the site plan process not with arbitrary widths which have no relation to the use or size of the parcel. The 60 foot width was created to address strip centers- not an individual use. The proposed use, a building supply complex can not be achieved without the proper width of the building. With regard to the fence, 8 feet is a standard security fence. The two existing structures are set back approximately 28 feet from the Main Road. The easterly structure is 72 feet wide and 1 foot off the side property line, the westerly structure is 45 feet wide and set off 5 feet off the side property line. Both structures are a combined width of 117 feet ( the proposed structure is @ 115) In addition the structures are only 30 feet apart and therefore occupy the entire parcel without required screening or parking. The proposed structure will be a significant improvement to the existing conditions of the site. 4. The variance will have no adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The use is permitted in the LIO district, the property will be properly vegetated through an extensive site plan process, the new structures will enhance the property and will replace several structures which are nonconforming and do not provide adequate screening. 5. The alleged difficulty was not self-created. 6. The variance requested is the minimum variance practicable given the personal benefits anticipated by the applicant. The proposed structure is designed by persons in the building supply trade. The applicants have spent countless hours with the design professionals and suppliers to design a state -of -the art complex. The warehouse is customized for the use, the retail and office portion were designed by Don Denis, architect, with the changing and improving business character of the district. With regard to the fence, the security fence is in character with the adjacent commercial uses. We respectfully request that the appeal be granted, together with any further relief that is deemed necessary and reasonable. si State of New York ) County of Suffolk ) ss.: Sworn to this day Notary Public i PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 315 Westphalia Road P.O. Box 483 Mattituck, New York 11952 Tel: (516) 298-5629 Fax: (516) 298-5664 Ms. Laury Dowd Southold Town Attorney Southold Town Hall Main Road. Southold, NY 11971 December 29, 1997 Re: Riverhead Building Supply Inc. Dear Ms. Dowd: In accordance with our telephone conversation on this date, my client, Riverhead Building Supply, and Mr. Goodale are aware that the proposed building is located between two parcels. Mr. Goodale and Riverhead Building Supply will address this issue prior to an application to the Town for a building permit on the structures. Please ask the Building Inspector to issue a notice of disapproval with regard to all zoning variances except the zero sideyard setback between the two parcels. This issue will be moot prior to the issuance of a building permit for the proposed structures. Thank you for your anticipated courtesies. Very truly yours, Patricia C. Moore PCM/mr- cc: Allen Smith, Esq. Riverhead Building Supply�`� 't ~ i The N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act requires submission of this form, and an environmental review will be tt:ade Ly this iloara before any action is taken. SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM INSTRUCTIONS: (a) In order to answer the questions in this short EAF it is assumed that the preparer will use currently available information concerning the project and the likely impacts of the action. It is not expected that. additional studies, research or other investigations will be undertaken. (b) If any question has been answered Yes the project may be sig- nificant and completed Environmental Assessment Form is necessary. (c) If all questions have been answered No it is likely that the project is not significant. (d) Environmental Assessment 1. Will project result in a large physical change to the project site or physically'alter more than 10 acres of land? Yes No 2. Will there be a major change to any unique or unusual land form on the site? Yes No 3. Will project alter or have a large effect on / an existing body of water? _Yes ✓ No 4. Will project have a potentially large impact on groundwater quality? Yes /No 5. Will project significantly effect drainage flow on adjacent sites? Yes /U. 6. Will project affect any threatened or endangered / plant or animal species? Yes J No 7. Will project result in a major adverse effect on air quality? Yes ,/o 8. Will project have a major effect on visual char- acter of the community or scenic views or vistas known to be important to the community? Yes /No 9. Will project adversely impact any site or struct- ure.of historic, pre_historic, or paleontological importance or any site designated as a critical envire.nmental area by a local agency? _Yes _No 10. Will project have a major effect on existing or future recreational opportunities? Yes INO 11. Will project result in major traffic problems or cause a major effect to existing transportation systems? Yes No 12. Will project regularly cause.objectionable odors, noise, glare, vibration,,or electrical disturb- / ante as a result of the project's operation? _Yes V No 13. Will project have any impact on public health or safety? _Yes �//No 14. Will project affect the existing community by / directly causing a growth in permanent popula- ✓ tion of more than 5 percent over_a one-year Yes No period or have a major negative effect on the character of the community or neighborhood? 15. Is there public con roverssyyconcerning the _ project? _Yes /No Preparer-s Signature: /' �,/,, g Representing: /?Gl/e-e1z GZ,1 zzyy • Z:e4 Date: ZBA 4/75 G i 14-16.4 (2187)—Text 12S EQ R PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only hu Annlinnnt nr PrniPCt q nnsnr) 1. APPLICANT /SPONSOR 2. PROJEC NAME �22f v� s(v 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality %GZ e>7� Op� cSOUT 1OL-D County 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map) 7q�/o 7ysoo ma�� ,�1, �rort 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: 99 New ❑ Expansion ❑ Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: S Initially 5' ' acres Ultimately acres S. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? ClYes No, If No, describe briefly �� /,✓l00th %Jiegv/res a VC+ Hance 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? G Residential ! Industrial Commercial ❑ Agriculture ParkfForesUOpen space Other Describe: U1 Lpllo- to. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL OR FUNDING. NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL STATE OR LOCAL)? �L Yes ❑ No If yes, list agency(s) and permittapprovals �j/im/�L % 11. 'COES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTQ14 HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? c791 Yes (�_. N,--� If ye list agency name and permitiapproval Ile ems 12. AS A RESULT IOF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMITIAPPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION?' ❑ Yes No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Date: 02 3 Applicant/sponsor name- Signature:�''�� If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 ' (Conti nue.d on reverse ,side ) The Town o interest o purpose of alert the it to take APPLICANT TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURR FORM Southold's Code of Ethics prole the part of town officers and his form is to provide informa wn of possible conflicts of in liatever action is riecessary to ipits coni[ employees. Lion which hoioa!- n"A avoid same ices of - The . can allow YOUR NAME: �DC��L 6dOD�LE (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in Elie name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company's name.) NATURE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Variance �_ Change of zone Approval of plat Exemption from plat or Other (If "Other," name the official map activity.) Do you personally (or through your company, spout:e, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the 'Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest_ "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the town, officer or employee has evert a partial ownership of (or employment- by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO If you answered "YES," complete the balance of.til,is form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by Elie Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (Elie applicant) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in Elie space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that; apply): A) the owner of greater than 5%.6f- the shares or the corporate stock or the applicant (when the applicant Is a corporation); B) Elie legal or beneficial owner or any interest in a noncorporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of Elie applicant; or D) Elie actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this .0Abda f Fcb 1992 Signature Print- name__ 9r,.r l ao�a DISCLOSURE I, William D. Moore hereby state pursuant to,General Municipal Law Section 809 and Southold Town Code Article 10 the following: 1. An application has been submitted by Patricia C. Moore to the Southold Town .Zoning Board of Appeals on behalf of the Riverhead Building !Supply Corp. , 2. Patricia C. Moore is an attorney duly licensed in the State of New York practicing as a sole practicioner with her own clients. She is not affiliated with my law practice. 3. Patricia C. Moore is my wife. 4. I am a member of the Southold Town Board. 5. I do not directly or indirectly review, discuss or participate to any extent in the matter of the Riverhead Building Supply Corp. before the Southold Town Zoning Board. 6. Patricia C. Moore is compensated for her legal services, at an hourly rate, regardless of the outcome of the case, and her fee is not contingent on the results obtained. Dated: February 3, 1998 Ts r r SNOUI.O RER g,„ "' �� ' B.C. 41.13 EX\'o ,.,. E�ALK 47.8 � tAc- CURB 'GONG' _ ,0- 7 _ -� p, GO P EXISTING 10'0 WATER MAIN. AFFI2 SIGNS 'pAvvn tkls •'j/� NEw RXtSSING NYT � � "EAST 25" 1 SUFFOLK COUNTY _ "TRUCK 25' 09 EDclE OF GONG 51-etj 944-2A WATER AUTHORITY �' EXISTING i i 7 s SIGN t ARRO f �i ' NEtU P I 0 WATER NOTE ALIGN NC. � l SERVICE SPEED LIMIT 30'_ - - - _ _ _ _ C -A- 51DE ALK W1 EXISTING 01 41. 5 EXISTING, ' nCUR t SIDE ALK 17 EpGE OF PAVEMENT Q\� F1C SIGN 1809 INLET u B DRAIN -1 k T.C.B C. +4 SO , ` (MILE MARKER) 'GR T>�� g.�R\pING l� • \1 IG5I3 0104 00 i � (RSR-NOOT) _ \ / ' � 17, gµOUIOER O � ttl � fT77 ) As' N 7c "GURg•GUS \ O' __- 4e. 11h0;12' DEE , - NES "'°� • ',, AREA �%�� TR EARING 4 YT LAN �•c, e �c S T�11/ HALT (5E e 17,q! f` DETAIL) C 17,11 k �O g�F \ �, " G�B1` I - V p0Sg�B Ro z � , - a � aR Lg \ 8J31 M 40 _a _ A �.. ` , 8 C'Qclss 4 LOT 17 li R RONC: NY ' T s AQP j t.G• \ °' 1 \ \ / °° aCCBsg 33 E ID, r ` _ so RAMP DOWN gH�tipE�g rA °a1'3n s c e.r. , , NEW AS e. TRAFFIC SIGNS CURB FACIN P pR8 S G.,e �`, 4B�c $ SIGN M _ _ - -1 `a•G ORIENT PT FERRY TRA ►Mii17, 73 SHELTER 15 FERR Op PA` t ARRO 7 15°Q4' 44.E \;f �t1� `1 e.c. ro ' _ ` (1°1 I �.lp.z.u.,,Ie� \Ige, � ®N' GONG• g\� � p�,v\Na\`\ �1 �,� 41.00 e.,o `\ INS . �� �'• 17 vE0 \ 94 NE\U P• "nZ F,A 8c 4e !^•t.ca• 38 P A PIA = std'3 d w \ RE L T.c- g c •,e ; ® ` I °• O 1 ,,,.o ,p 49.0 A `'1 w\� 1 ' Al �' , t 1797 � PAVED \ _ M ," � a `- PHAL\f \ / ray \P VING 'U5 I I r- . iErkG wP �iSTY C Ol5p�etiF`/ 71J 96 g A 01 REP P .,eW S\NGSN. VC REMSOVED V c ;.9ac tp / Z _ A a~10 i n �' � o � � 1 W ST �E pF ' ' ' • � ..LP rn d •. ° NG ERTEN � � / O. J ! XISTIN noo CIRCq- / (p ATER /) )Z (S�A (3)Z O 3P TORA�,E AT/ON N �"�` E� I8 YP CNGS l q NG ERVIC lu �� ACEs / 8 AR '� CJ n 13 ,\3 O— 1-1 -' ' �q.-°• � I \ 110 % / c )9-' 1 ' 3) 13)J c'_' „ f (2)A Iry f=%CIS _ Q / / �,,e / /®� •'c\.'''—e�,'`,, ` 83 /\� .cd , l3)Z -/ l,\—,,a '•••• S AEl.07-I C. C 0,� OS I GCT BuILDINGs dSUNRIS N� o 00.1 �p 4' V-' 0 COACH NES • • o`o / Q c I NYDR Not 2, � / ,DO��:• '' � 0 g.F• / • EXoL$1 `°�° 122 �711 OvvtAcl .O •O J � \ TES: c � � C O / \ 1 5 ENS Gp,L ,' `.< ; O �, Soo O oma" / l \QO \ 00 SITE DATA: �° I G,.� / �L • _ - \ _ ,7 FEN jG N o SITE AREA: ° 8' NIGH i F'F --'�- 5 c• D� EE I / .21'10 ACRES) p P. c�;�� .-„�cy'�,.`� / � SACK �,�--\� 4 10, O P CF y/ LOT 1 (94,51 S.F. 2 ENCS I L '' OT 2 (162,011 S.F./ 3.121 ACRES) ”` S O L�" X 5' CH�NG / I 9 A RES a I ®.T i4't I ; / ; ;-''�,J-E `` _;''\ O \*5 ?00\-5 OLS SITE TOTAL: S. / 5. 38 C i `, cl.;: •. BANI C 6 o -'� / o CNIMNE� C \ LP, o ZONING: oc A/ Ln ' E TEM i A ; DENSER• - \ LOT I t LOT 2 I 8 �;;°o' ,' REMO`/ED' 01.\oJ� C O ZONING: LIO (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL P RK/ '" / 1 ,, � UJ g.F • , PLANNED OFFICE PA K) �, I S.00 / YARDS:ArlO, FRONT: 100 SIDE (ONE): 30' 1 4,45- " SIDE (BOTH) 40' �(HD REAR: 15' UA\1,+t1C. NO \ EOOoc LOT COVERAGE: DOq O \J \GO'� LOT COVERAGE: 20% (MAX.) / I / / (258,692 S.F. x 20% = 51.128 S.F. MAX. BUILDING FOOTPRINT)1 ` / x.,,15 / , 's O F::F • ; / p,RE• / up Alt O I I / I• j 1 1. O' LU I' UP 8US Y,4 a5 V \ �. rtG l \•i'/ , : G�a6' OTNI$ AREA or PARKING: lO'j\ O RETAIL: 1/200 S.F. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OFFICE: 1/100 S.F. OF OFFICE FLOOR AREA / 0 / WAREHOUSE: 1/1000 S.F. ' / ` OF GROSS FLOOR AREA it N lV P. 20 / / N - LANDSCAPING: v- / ,'-\X J, ° / F. LANDSCAPE AREA: 35% (MINIMUM) . /l lOMR(258,442 S.F. x 35% = 90,525 S.F. LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED) >< CP ONS/TS!R U )p Co PROVIDED: APPROX. 98.300 S.F.; 38.0% ry 0 (kA Or T! 0 N LANDSCAPE BUFFERS: a77A4 Z)17.. FRONT YARD: 25' 47 TR/CT(SIDE/REAR): 4' 4 PERIMETER BUFFER TO RESIDENTIAL ZONE: 30' P / \� i EklS 7-' OP IVG PROPOSED SITE PLAN:/ O lC,4y� 4e / SQUARE FOOTAGE: /,•\ F3/ / / / \ �\ 04.,' / BUILDING I t CHECK OUT RETAIL: 8,650 S.F. • / j r l / it % ` I l OFFICE: 4503.F. CHECK-OUT: 250 S.F. : / / O r / WAREHOUSE: 5,000 S.F. SUB TOTAL: 14,350 S.F. / BUILDING 2 (DRIVE-THRU)' / OG, r / l ` _ r 1 C -. 23,640 S.F. �e / : FA\ / l r -/�G�+'\�b0 l J / BUILDING 3 (STORAGE) 5000 S.F./ ► / , _ 0 / TOTAL: 43,010 S.F, r I LOT COVERAGE: (LOT 1 t 2) 14.1 % / ' 9 / ;/ / / I' / P F , 0 -- / / PARKING BUILDING I t CHECK OUT / , / / �� RETAIL: 8450 S.F./200= 43..3 SPACES / / '/ \`- OFFICE: 100 S.F./100= 1.0 SPACES ' ` / of WAREHOUSE: 5,000 S.F./1000= 5.0 SPACES / . /�\ O - _ •�' \ _ BUILDING 2 t 3: 28,440 S.F./1000= 28.1 SPACES* u�L 1 \ / : � � ry ��N � 70',0„ TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED: 84 SPAC - \ ; �3,6b ' l 45 SPACE'S / O , ! TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: � , , F I`• S. P. *NOTE: OPERATIONAL CONCEPT INCORPORATES, 4%. :/ (D 1 INTERNAL DRIVE-THRU SERVICE WHICH SHOULD REDUCE /\\// / / ' $ OUTDOOR PARKING REQUIREMENTS. \ 0 \ / / r O tY / r \\ : �, • �'°° � ; � O ; REP C, `b .0 8 (.jf',L � 4 O \ \ ,-41 r ','-- \ ' SYMBOLS: /.I / 44, ,OE i /0 O , \ I YE Nr I 1 1 I 4i ,I REM HG AT/Q� S rTO _H16 A l \ 1 ' rGA \ / _ K` / \ /,�� Fq/ ^- •--- `T!QEI�CH oR i' . , \� \ / \', l I / Il /l l / SYM DESCRIPTION TC TOP OF CURB BC BOTTOM OF CURB • BOLLARD TG TOP OF GRATE TL TOP OF LID FF FINISHED FLOOR R RADIUS EX EXISTING 10.2 EX. ELEVATION +10.0 NEW ELEVATION .'-`. EXISTING CONTOUR FORMER CONTOUR REV.: 5 NOV 2001 SCHO 21 NOV 2001 PLANNING NEW CONTOUR / • ( 30 ,0p - - - l ,5 30,,x• / - EY SITUATE- GREENPORT, NY '0 O� 414 - - - - ` T� Vwc CCH a / RFLO SNG C,q� � \ w Nc \ k/S +47so 6 . \ AS/ Ca T I 1 I ? RA T lug C CN AR LOuj 4 ), e , / ENCS I I c+4'25O AGE j cd T l; ® ; \ 4"_' / NFw.G1�,4 t.u�'1•�5 \®,----- - - - _ mR� RAP m \ / VL N` \P \A r ) PE / I O ' 70° 0 -Tb, ,150 ,T Ca'd1' Ili / b,1 / • ' I 8' ,3 OSCE ,3 41' � _ ------------ / 2(,r2.90' 1 / ClC,H *a ,� l - - - ° "W - - - -- - - -___-/ / 1 / O 5 10 20 30 50 _ _ _ ° - — ► I ------------------ _N_�j-12_(CiZ_O-R6�0_______ ____, I f�LAN FIJ .4O' I �_ _____LO_N_C115_LA _ _ ______ 5.84-10',40"W° ° I 131 `.---- --------------------------- _ -- -----— - - ---I `2�'- / / / -- - - -- - - - - -' - '- - - _ _ - - - - - - - -- - -- '- -- LOCALE: DRAWING INFO. DRAWING NO. ___---- __--------- -- _ GREENPORT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCALE: I" = 20'-0" ARC HtTECT: - — — -" JOB: SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY JOB NO: 9604 DATE: 21 AUG 2001 DONALD A. DENISD P.O.BOX 565 p BU5LD�H(3 SCTMtt 000-44-1-2.1 REV.: 5 NOV 2001 SCHO 21 NOV 2001 PLANNING 61 MAIN ROAD RIVERHEAD 18 DEC 2001 NYS DOT AQUEBOGUE, NY BUILDING SUPPLY MAIN ROAD (RTE. 258�: GREENPORT,NY M DOD18 Ho � � LI�J p O � IJ U Lry U LIOF DEC 2001 A.R.B. 52 CURB CUT 35'-0" 3'-O" fe # 30'. DRIVEWAY WIDTH - MAX. SLOPE 1/12 3/4" EXPANSION JOINT P. CO C. SIDE ALK, SCOR 5' O.C. SCORE MARKS 3/4" EXPANSION JOINT 51-O„ 131_01# STRIPING IN OVERRIDE AREA FOR LARGE TRACTOR TRAILERS SIDEWALK. CLASS F. ITEM 10608.0103 hSO IDEW LK WIDT MA CH EXI TING CURB VARIABLE SLOPES) 3'- " (MIN.) INCREASE AS NECESSARY TO ATTAIN 1/12 SLOPE DRIVEWAY PLAN DIMENSION "C" SEE TABLE DWG. NO. T -I 51-0'(f)* SIDEWALK , I DRIVEWAY E *(MATCH EXISTING WIDTH) FULL HEIGHT NORMAL SIDEWALK CURB ��� rELEVATION i 1 �---�( 1/4' PER FT. ____-� R=1" _______ -------------- ------3/4" PER FT.---_-------- ----- -•-•---•- cr MIN. SLOPE= 1/4" PEPER R FT. WIRE FABRIC ITEM 10608.0103 1 1 SCORE MARK DRIVEWAY_I I CURB SECTION 1 I NOTE: THE FIRST FULL 5' FLAG OF SIDEWALK TO EITHER SIDE OF DRIVEWAY SHALL BE 8" THICK. WIRE FABRIC REINFORCED. ITEM 10408.0103 DRIVEWAY SECTION SNOW STORAGE STRIP I 5'-O'(t)* SIDEWALK I OFFSET STRIP (MATCH EXISTING WIDTH) *(MATCH EXISTING WIDTH) 3'-O' DESIRABLE ' GRASS STRIP 1/4' PER FT. (MIN. PITCH) ITEM 408.0101 (4') ITEM 203.1 CONCETE A SIDEWALK SECTION (ITEM 104041.2801) I/2' = 1'-0' I ' �- CURB/FAVING ROAD FRONTAGE (N.Y.S. RT. 25) DRIVEWAYS I. PARKING AREAS N.Y.S. D.O.T. (MEET ALL TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SPECIFICATIONS) 4' (MIN.) (VARIES) 1 1/2' RADIUS 1„ 4" P.CONC. ITEM 18403.1'135, I I/2" TOP CURB SAW CUT GRADE 7 EXISTING PAVING PAVING TO HAVE EpGE OF 1/4" PER FOOT SLOPE TRAVEL LANE ITEM 180403.1335. \ NOTE: THE END OF CURB 1 1/2' BINDER 0 NOT ABUTTING EXISTING ITEM 403.11. CURB SHALL BE RAMPED 5 i/2" BASE - - - DOWN TO ZERO HEIGHT O' AT LOCATIONS ST ITEM 1'1304.1011 A.O.B.E±/ --AL I i FACING TRAFFIC. J� ITEM 1049.2801 CURB INLET BOX t,i v C fl /l T JRB BOX ON -MOUNTABLE) EM 455.05 1-----------------i ----------------- D.O.T. ---------------- D.O.T. NOTES AFTER COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, ALL EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES ALONG RIGHT OF WAY, ADJACENT TO PROPERTY. ARE TO BE CLEANED. ANY TRAFFIC SIGNS MOVED SHALL BE REPLACED IN ORIGINAL LOCATION. ANY TRAFFIC SIGNS DAMAGED SHALL BE REPAIRED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION, OR REPLACED WITH NEW 1 1\2' NYS TYP IA MIX 2 1/2" COMPACTED BITUMINOUS MIX 7 COMPACTED BASE P.CONC. [-CURB 'I II GRADE N.Y.S. D.O.T. TRAFFIC CONTROL AT SHOULDER AND SLOWLY MOVING WORK AREAS 0 --�I ADVANCE WARNING 300 TO 500' 150' TAPER 100' LONGITUDINAL BUFFER END ROAD WORK LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE: A -i$I- POST MOUNTED 115111 METAL HALIDE FIXTURE, EXCELINE SAR SERIES MOUNTED ON 14 FT 4 INCH SQUARE POLE. SHIELD FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES. B +O WALL MOUNTED I5 WATT METAL HALIDE FIXTURE HAOCO SWAN SERIES V'4131- C: 4131.C &) WALL EXCELINE 300 SERIES WALL16 TT METAL HALIDE CUBE D EXCLE ELINE EU SAFDSERI SD LIGHT. 400 SILHOUETTE. 4FTTMETALLPOLEfDE E O SURFACE MOUNTED CANOPY FIXTURE. 150 WATT METAL HALIDE. EXCELINE MP SERIES MINIPRO. ARCHITECT: JOB: DONALD A. DENIS P'.O.13OX 565 RIVERHEAD MAIN ROAD BUILDING SUPPLY AQUEBOGUE, N.Y. MAIN ROAD (RT.25) (516)122-3511 GREENPORT, NY ULD x x 28' C N E TYPIC L ,�,,x x 5H END ROAD WORK WORK AREA 100' L NGITUDINAL BUFFER ER 150' TAPER + 300 TO 500" ADVANCE WARNING O Ra B111DING SUPPLY EMS mk Flor),01 I l�im TEST HOLE 4B-4: INFORMATION FROM: McDONALD GEDSCIENCE SOUTHOLD, NY 14 JAN 1991 EL +48.5' 0 DARK BROWN I' SILTY LOAM (OL) BROWN LOAMY 3' SILT (ML) BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAND (SW) 12.1' WATER WATER IN BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAND (SW) SANITARY CALCULATIONS: GWM ZONE IV, YIELD: LOO GPD PER ACRE COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY IS PROVIDED BY SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY YIELD= 400 GPD/ACRE PERMITTED DENSITY = 5.938 ACRES x 400 GPD/ACRE = 3562.4 GPD DRY STORE FLOW: 0.03 GPD PER S.F. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA WAREHOUSE SPACE: 0.04 GPD PER S.F. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA DENSITY CALCULATIONS: PROPOSED BUILDINGS: BUILDING I (MAIN RETAIL AREA) 14.100 SF CHECKOUT 250 S.F. BUILDING 2 (DRIVE-THRU RETAIL SPACE) 23440 S.F. SUBTOTAL 38.010 S.F. FLOW 38,010 S.F. x 0.03 GPD PER S.F. = 1140 GPD BUILDING 3 (STORAGE) 5000 S.F. FLOW 5,000 S.F. x 0.04 GPD PER S.F. = 200 GPD COMBINED FLOWS 1340 GPD PROPOSED DENSITY: 1340 GPD / 5.938 ACRES = 226 GPD/ACRE SANITARY SYSTEM DESIGN: SEPTIC TANK: SEPTIC TANK W/ (2) DAY FLOW): 1340 GPD x 2 DAYS = 2480 GAL. USE 3000 GAL. SEPTIC TANK LEACHING POOLS: SANITARY FLOW: 1340 GPD LEACHING RATE: 1.5 GAL./S.F./DAY SIDEWALL AREA REQUIRED: 1340 GPD DIVIDED BY 1.5 GAL/S.F./DAY = 893 S.F. SIDEWALL AREA PROVIDED: (4) 10'-0"0 X 5'-0" DEEP POOLS = 942 S.F. USE (6) 10'-O"� x 5'-0" DEEP PDOLS w/ TRAFFIC BEARING DOMES t C.I. COVERS NEIGHBORING WELLS WITHIN ISO FT NO KNOWN PRIVATE OR PUBLIC WELLS WITHIN 150 FT OF SITE PROPERTIES WITHIN 150 FEET OF SITE x SCTM tt STREET ADDRESS NAME x 1000-44-1 T ROUTE 25 x SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 1000-4L-2.IJ 10' x (APPLICANT) deep 1000-44-2.2 ROUTE 25 SEVEN -ELEVEN x 1000-44-4 x SUNRISE COACH LINES SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 1000-44-8 ROUTE 25 VACANT (THOMAS JURZENIA t WIFE) x 1000-44-9 x VACANT (ANNE MARIE NELSON) 3 1000-44-31.1 1000 NINTH ST DRIFTWOOD COVE APARTMENTS x 1000-45-6.1 x SUNRISE COACH LINES SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 1000-45-8.1 ROUTE 25 VERIZON x 1000-45-8.3 x PORTOBELLO RESTAURANT SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 0.11 FT. 3613 C.F. x D x 10' d1a.x T deep 480 C.F. x 11190 S.F. 5665 T RAFFIC 3809 C.F. 3840 C.F. E LANE LDER x 6' dee .411 C.F. 1 2400 S.F. 0.11 TRAFFI 400 C.F. "411 C.F. F LANE 10' d1a.x 1' x 480 C.F. 9 ULD x x 28' C N E TYPIC L ,�,,x x 5H END ROAD WORK WORK AREA 100' L NGITUDINAL BUFFER ER 150' TAPER + 300 TO 500" ADVANCE WARNING O Ra B111DING SUPPLY EMS mk Flor),01 I l�im TEST HOLE 4B-4: INFORMATION FROM: McDONALD GEDSCIENCE SOUTHOLD, NY 14 JAN 1991 EL +48.5' 0 DARK BROWN I' SILTY LOAM (OL) BROWN LOAMY 3' SILT (ML) BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAND (SW) 12.1' WATER WATER IN BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAND (SW) SANITARY CALCULATIONS: GWM ZONE IV, YIELD: LOO GPD PER ACRE COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY IS PROVIDED BY SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY YIELD= 400 GPD/ACRE PERMITTED DENSITY = 5.938 ACRES x 400 GPD/ACRE = 3562.4 GPD DRY STORE FLOW: 0.03 GPD PER S.F. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA WAREHOUSE SPACE: 0.04 GPD PER S.F. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA DENSITY CALCULATIONS: PROPOSED BUILDINGS: BUILDING I (MAIN RETAIL AREA) 14.100 SF CHECKOUT 250 S.F. BUILDING 2 (DRIVE-THRU RETAIL SPACE) 23440 S.F. SUBTOTAL 38.010 S.F. FLOW 38,010 S.F. x 0.03 GPD PER S.F. = 1140 GPD BUILDING 3 (STORAGE) 5000 S.F. FLOW 5,000 S.F. x 0.04 GPD PER S.F. = 200 GPD COMBINED FLOWS 1340 GPD PROPOSED DENSITY: 1340 GPD / 5.938 ACRES = 226 GPD/ACRE SANITARY SYSTEM DESIGN: SEPTIC TANK: SEPTIC TANK W/ (2) DAY FLOW): 1340 GPD x 2 DAYS = 2480 GAL. USE 3000 GAL. SEPTIC TANK LEACHING POOLS: SANITARY FLOW: 1340 GPD LEACHING RATE: 1.5 GAL./S.F./DAY SIDEWALL AREA REQUIRED: 1340 GPD DIVIDED BY 1.5 GAL/S.F./DAY = 893 S.F. SIDEWALL AREA PROVIDED: (4) 10'-0"0 X 5'-0" DEEP POOLS = 942 S.F. USE (6) 10'-O"� x 5'-0" DEEP PDOLS w/ TRAFFIC BEARING DOMES t C.I. COVERS NEIGHBORING WELLS WITHIN ISO FT NO KNOWN PRIVATE OR PUBLIC WELLS WITHIN 150 FT OF SITE PROPERTIES WITHIN 150 FEET OF SITE DESCRIPTION SCTM tt STREET ADDRESS NAME DOMESTIC WATER SOURCE 1000-44-1 T ROUTE 25 RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 1000-4L-2.IJ 10' dla.x (APPLICANT) deep 1000-44-2.2 ROUTE 25 SEVEN -ELEVEN SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 1000-44-4 ROUTE 25 SUNRISE COACH LINES SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 1000-44-8 ROUTE 25 VACANT (THOMAS JURZENIA t WIFE) dia.x 1000-44-9 NINTH ST VACANT (ANNE MARIE NELSON) 3 1000-44-31.1 1000 NINTH ST DRIFTWOOD COVE APARTMENTS SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 1000-45-6.1 14415 ROUTE 25 SUNRISE COACH LINES SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 1000-45-8.1 ROUTE 25 VERIZON SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 1000-45-8.3 14825 ROUTE 25 PORTOBELLO RESTAURANT SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY NO OTHER PROPERTIES WITHIN 150 FEET CAST IRON COVERS ,!2=0' � GRADE I' MIN./2' MAX.P.CONC. COLLAR HEIGHT '- F- COLLAR 8" TRAFFIC INLET- MI w BEARING SLAB 4"0 2400 P PE, ...........:� ........FLO OU LET- MIN. MIN. PITC 1 4 PER I' '/ MIN. 40004-�PIPB . ' r PER I' BAFFLE W/8"x 24" OPENING SEPTIC TANK C.I. COVER 404) CLASS '-O"IMIN) TO TO GRADE 2400 PIPE C.I. COVER i I' - "( MAX) (TYP.) �I/8" PER I' TO GRADE EL +19.2-,,,,20" DIA. ACCE MIN. PITCH EL +48.1' +/- (TYP.) 4"0 CLASS NOTE: BACKFILL WITH 2400 PIPE INVERT CLEAN SAND FREE 1%4" PER I'ZEL +45.9' OF DEBRIS AND MIN. PITCH INVERT INVERT INVERT '--------- ORGANIC MATTER EL +41.0' EL +46.5' EL +44.4' LP -1114 INVERT LP -2,3,5,4 18" DROP T EL +45. i<1 ItH EL +40.8 __________�-REQ'D CLEARANCE _ _____EL +3g,QL ___ --------- -------------- --------- GROUNDWATER ______EL +XQL--_ ------------------- ---- 10' x 5'-4" DEEP LEACHING RINGS SANITARY SYSTEM W/ 8" TRAFFIC BEARING SLAB AREA DESCRIPTION DRAINAGE RINGS VOL. EACH NO, AREA ROOF ADD-IN 2" RAIN VOLUME REQUIRED VOLUME PROVIDED A PARKING LOT 10' dla.x T deep 480 C.F. 5 13410 S.F. 0.11 FT. 2245 C.F. 2400 C.F. B FRONT WEST 10' dia.x 6' deep 411 C.F. 3 4355 S.F. 2830 S.F. 0.11 FT. 1191 C.F. 1233 C.F. C WEST COURT 10' d1a.x T deep 480 C.F. 8 11325 S.F. 4350 S.F. 0.11 FT. 3613 C.F. 3840 C.F. D EAST COURT 10' d1a.x T deep 480 C.F. 8 11190 S.F. 5665 0.11 FT. 3809 C.F. 3840 C.F. E LOADING DOCK AREA 10' dla.x 6' dee .411 C.F. 1 2400 S.F. 0.11 FT. 400 C.F. "411 C.F. F WEST SHED AREA 10' d1a.x 1' deep 480 C.F. 9 10640 S.F. 14400 S.F. 0.11 FT. 4113 C.F. 4320 C.F. G EAST SHED AREA 10' d►a.x T deep 480 C.F. 8 13190 S.F. 12530 S.F. 0.11 FT. 4381 C.F. 4320 C.F. G H EAST SHED AREA, SE SOUTH SHED AREA(HI) Overflow 10' d1a.x to woods 5.5' deeD 315 C.F. 1 1 9590 S.F. 0.11 FT. 1598 C.F. 541 C.F. 1508 C.F. H GRAVEL AREA (0.60 factor) 10' d1a.x 5' deep 342 C.F. 4 16910 S.F. 0.11 FT. 2121 C.F. 1110 C.F. H GRAVEL AREA, SE Overflow to woods 1 1441 C.F. I MAIN BLDG, NE 10' dla.x 5.5' deeD 315 C.F. 1 2830 S.F. 0.11 FT. 354 C.F. 315 C.F. J MAIN BLDG, SE 10' d1a.x 4' deep 214 C.F. 2 9350 S.F. 0.11 FT. 544 C.F. 548 C.F. K SHED 2, SE 10' dla.x 4' deep 214 C.F. 1 1265 S.F. 0.11 FT. 158 C.F. 214 C.F. L ENTRY AREA 10' d1a.x 1' deep 480 C.F. 1 2240 S.F. - S.F. 0.11 FT. 313C.F. 480 C.F. TOTAL 54 101910 S.F. 48220 S.F. 24548 C.F. 25,405 C.F. ALL DRAINAGE RINGS SHALL HAVE A TRAFFIC BEARING TOP SLAB AND A CAST IRON COVER OR GRATE SET AT THE SPECIFIED ELEVATION. DRAINAGE RINGS SHALL BE CONNECTED AS SHOWN WITH 12"0 CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE. DRAINAGE RING (TYP) NOTE: DRAINAGE PIPE C.I. COVER/GRATE FROM DOWNSPOUTS TO TO GRADE OR DRAINAGE RINGS TO BE BURIED CONCRETE 8"0 PVC PIPING(SDR-35). 1'-0" TO COVER (SEE PLAN) DRAINAGE PIPE 2'-0" PRECAST CONNECTING DRAINAGE COLLAR GRADE RINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE 1200 CORR. POLYETHYLENE PIPE. TRAFFIC OD BEARING SLAB 2 IL C) PRECAST DRAINw X RINGS AGE 4� >o I l------------------------ -- CLEARANCE 0 SELECT I GRANULAR FILL- > iv.............................�..... GROUND WATER LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE: REF.ts QTY. COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE NOTES M SUGAR MAPLE ACER SACCHARUM 2 1/2" CAL. BtB P BRADFORD PEAR PYRUS CALLERYANA 2" CAL. BtB B GRAY BIRCH BETULA POPULIFOLIA 8'-10' CLUMPS H EASTERN WHITE PINE PINUS STROBUS C HIGH C EASTERN RED CEDAR JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA 4' HIGH J SHORE JUNIPER JUNIPERUS CONFERTA 15-18" GROUND COVER Y AMERICAN YEW TAXUS CANEDENSIS 15-18" A PINK AZALEA RHODODENDRON SPP 15-18" Z RED AZALEA RHODODENDRON SPP 15-18" S SPURGE PACHYSANDRA TERM. FLATS GROUND COVER LOCALE: DRAWING INFO. GREENPORT SCALE: I" = 20'-0" TOWN OF SOUTHOLD JOB NO: 9604 SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY DATE: 21 AUG 2001 5CTM4 1000-44-1-1 REV.: 1000-44-1-2.1 5 NOV 2001 SCHD 21 NOV 2001 PLANNING 18DEC 2001 D.O.T. 18 DEC 2001 A.R.B. DRAWING NO. S2 F 5 ROOF OVERHANG EAST t WEST ELEVATIONS -BUILDING 2 - A I •• A I 111 -' DOORS NORTH t SOUTH ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 2 1/16° = 1'-0" NORTH I SOUTH ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 3 EAST t WEST ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 3 (NO DOORS ON WEST) VII = 1'-0" 1/16° = 1'-0" 11 A I I I A. I1MA l SOUTH ELEVATION - BUILDING 1 1/8j1 = 11_01, RAMP FIBEI SHIN, 'TAN EAST ELEVATION - BUILDING 1 1/8° = 1,_0ll A GO LIAI T IP_AI %/AI IIMC' CEMENT ILE5 FIBER 5HINGLI 'TAN' WEST ELEVATION - BUILDING I 1/8" = 11-0" PAINTED WHITE I ­_­ - NORTH ELEVATION - BUILDING I 1/8" = 1'-0" D D D � H 8 U D D D D DL LOCALE: TOWN OF T TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY. NY DRAWING INFO. SOB 0: 19604 I' -O" DATE: 5 SEPT 2001 DRAWING NO. ARCHITECT: DONALD A. DENIS DONALD A. JOB: MAIN ROAD AQUEBOGUE, N Y RIV ERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY o O V�%FoD 5CTMu 1000-44-1-1 1000 -4G -I-2.1 REV.: 21 NOV 2001 PLANNING 18 DEC 2001 ARB MAIN ROAD (RTE. 25) (631)122-3511 GREENPORT, NY OF A2 CUSTOMER PARKING ARCHITECT: DONALD A. DENIS P.O.BOX 565 MAIN ROAD AQUEBOGUE, NY (631)'122-3511 LAVATORIES � LUNCH ROON JOB: RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY MAIN ROAD (RTE. 25) GREENPORT, NY FllIVEFiHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY BUILDING I FLOOR PLAN LOCALE: DRAWING INFO. DRAWING NO. GREENPORT SCALE: 1/8" = 1' -0 - TOWN OF SOUTHOLD JOB NO: 96014 SUFFOLK COUNTY. NY DATE: 5 SEPT 2001 SCTM# 1000 -4G -I -I REV.: 1000-44-1-2.1 5 NOV 2001 PLANNING 18 DEC 2001 A.R.B. OF A2 .+48.40 +49.00 • ARCHITECT: DONALD A. DENIS P.O.BOX 565 MAIN ROAD AQUEBOGUE, NY (631)'122-3511 LAVATORIES � LUNCH ROON JOB: RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY MAIN ROAD (RTE. 25) GREENPORT, NY FllIVEFiHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY BUILDING I FLOOR PLAN LOCALE: DRAWING INFO. DRAWING NO. GREENPORT SCALE: 1/8" = 1' -0 - TOWN OF SOUTHOLD JOB NO: 96014 SUFFOLK COUNTY. NY DATE: 5 SEPT 2001 SCTM# 1000 -4G -I -I REV.: 1000-44-1-2.1 5 NOV 2001 PLANNING 18 DEC 2001 A.R.B. OF A2 .+48.40 +49.00 ` � ' � ' . / � � � ' ' . / `^ / ' ' / / / / / / / / / / - - - / / . ~ / / ^ / `^ | ^^ | ~v` / ~` ( r Fl/ 6-, - __ _ _ _ _ __ _ -[� - -- -�-]-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -[�_ _- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _[l- _ - - - - _ - _-_Fl_ __ _ - _ _-__ _ ~~ ~~ ^~ `~ ^~ ^� ^� METAL scmF ' &J,����7~||MU����-T ELEVATION �| �����~T���&J |����� | F7LU���J | L-��L_ `� x�� � |��|� )"IR-CHITECT: Job: LOCALE: DWG. DATA: DRAWING NO. P.O.Box -;Lrj I ED) TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY. NY JOB NO: 9404 BUILDING S',UPFLY GRLENPORT, NY OF A2 'd— E -f m I% ------------- - ------- I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I i 1 I , 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 i 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 � 1 I 1 1 1 1 I i 1 1 i 1 I 1 I i f-----------------= i I I I I 1 I 1 1 I i I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 i 1 i I I 1 i 1 ! ; 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I i 1 I 1 ` 1 1 1 , I I I 1 i ; 1 I 4 I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I n I I tT] I 1 ii� 1 I i ; 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I ;, 1 i I 1 -- -_ D SAIL'" !G "10. rn r, �.,�� .IVB,. LAD C3 F L '� Ccri R.J [MdW[ERHEb%[0 � prn E -f m I% ------------- - ------- I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I i 1 I , 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 i 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 � 1 I 1 1 1 1 I i 1 1 i 1 I 1 I i f-----------------= i I I I I 1 I 1 1 I i I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 i 1 i I I 1 i 1 ! ; 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I i 1 I 1 ` 1 1 1 , I I I 1 i ; 1 I 4 I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I n I I tT] I 1 ii� 1 I i ; 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I ;, 1 i I 1 steel roof panels i --steel steel in rpt.,,l al -2.3 Tetul wall panels �J I e core slay on 5ra„e , i t, '�,.•':� « tt ��..ia i^'3 i Yciw 4m. \'R ------ - - - - -- ---- - ----- ----------- -— --- - --- -- ---- —— -- - __----------- -__-_______..__-__.--------------- ------------------ ------------------------------ ____-___--_--_.___-_..__y 1 l ' I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I ' I 1 1 i 1 I 1 1 i I I_______________________---______-__,� ._--__.___________--_______-_-__._-.-_ - _ __--.-------------- 17 iFCR ELEVA ICNS C�7 RETA'L AREA ' I \ f Ti \"u E I I -- - - - - - - - - -I- - - -- - - - - - - - L - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - t— 1 1 F= EE 1 I - (------ - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -"- ---I-- - - - - - - - ---------- - - - - -- -- 1 I I 1 I -- —I— -----L-A---------------- -- , I F3-- ------ — — CcUTER, I I I 1 I ; 1 , , a- --- --- -_== - --__ -- - -- ---------- - - - - -- t ...... I / I t 1 I 1 I I , ' � I 1 ' OFFICESI I / --- , - R�t, 1 ,,�.C�IVING I C_, I LUNCH I M . ; lll NECH - --� — ! - 1'--0" THICK CONCRETE LtIALL I t I -- FIRE SEPARATION WALL BETWEEN RETAIL AND WAREHOSE Tq BE THREE (3) HOUR AND OPENING PRO I ECTIVES TO BE THREE HOUR AND .'-,HALL BE SELF-CLOSING. ----------- ------------------------------ ------------------ CHECK-OUT BOOTH I ---------- ------ --- -- ---- ----------------------------- I I I I i I I I I i I - -------------------------I-------------------------------- I I I ------------ -------- ---- -- - ----------------------------- I I I . I I ---------------------------------------------------------------- I I f --------------------------- I I I -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- ! I I I I I ---- ---------------- --- WAREHOOSE I -------------------------------,------------------------ I I ---------- --- ------,---------------------- I I -- ---- -----------------------,------------------------ ------ all] ----- Qll] - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I I > r) 00 I I i I I ----------------------------- -------- ---------------------------------------------------- --- - --- ^^ILLWORK STOR, AG` I I ------------ ----------------------------- --------------------------------- ------------------------- I I I Q 111 ---------- ------ ----------�-- ----------------------- > ---------------------1> C F- U cn ----------------------------- M --------------------------- i LOADING DOCK "IETAL ROOF � ^1ETAL �1DINCs 1 I 1 - l_O.AC NG DOC °DELIVERIE: S O\%=RNcAD ^DOORS SOUTH =LE-VATIOM ISI tlt in QJ F_ llJ W UA j G U AC�IITECT: J03: ,`,�,'� �r� . -- -_ D SAIL'" !G "10. rn r, �.,�� .IVB,. LAD C3 F L '� Ccri R.J [MdW[ERHEb%[0 � prn '�, -•^-a* D A, 4, � `� � *. d GREENPORT T® U, C�- Cl1TE'OLD 4IJFFOLK COUNTY. Ii�tY SCALE: I" = W -O" JOB *t0• 9404 DATE: ME IM 11 t�ii AQUE-130GUH-, N.Y. BUILDINGC ieJ SUPPLY r .,.... 0 r e' I. l —. — — ,.CTI t 1000--14-1-1 1 7Z - V . r R-, MA!"� 'Ot�D l':T.2) G"EE°.PO".T, ?dY PE steel roof panels i --steel steel in rpt.,,l al -2.3 Tetul wall panels �J I e core slay on 5ra„e , i t, '�,.•':� « tt ��..ia i^'3 i Yciw 4m. \'R ------ - - - - -- ---- - ----- ----------- -— --- - --- -- ---- —— -- - __----------- -__-_______..__-__.--------------- ------------------ ------------------------------ ____-___--_--_.___-_..__y 1 l ' I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I ' I 1 1 i 1 I 1 1 i I I_______________________---______-__,� ._--__.___________--_______-_-__._-.-_ - _ __--.-------------- 17 iFCR ELEVA ICNS C�7 RETA'L AREA ' I \ f Ti \"u E I I -- - - - - - - - - -I- - - -- - - - - - - - L - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - t— 1 1 F= EE 1 I - (------ - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -"- ---I-- - - - - - - - ---------- - - - - -- -- 1 I I 1 I -- —I— -----L-A---------------- -- , I F3-- ------ — — CcUTER, I I I 1 I ; 1 , , a- --- --- -_== - --__ -- - -- ---------- - - - - -- t ...... I / I t 1 I 1 I I , ' � I 1 ' OFFICESI I / --- , - R�t, 1 ,,�.C�IVING I C_, I LUNCH I M . ; lll NECH - --� — ! - 1'--0" THICK CONCRETE LtIALL I t I -- FIRE SEPARATION WALL BETWEEN RETAIL AND WAREHOSE Tq BE THREE (3) HOUR AND OPENING PRO I ECTIVES TO BE THREE HOUR AND .'-,HALL BE SELF-CLOSING. ----------- ------------------------------ ------------------ CHECK-OUT BOOTH I ---------- ------ --- -- ---- ----------------------------- I I I I i I I I I i I - -------------------------I-------------------------------- I I I ------------ -------- ---- -- - ----------------------------- I I I . I I ---------------------------------------------------------------- I I f --------------------------- I I I -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- ! I I I I I ---- ---------------- --- WAREHOOSE I -------------------------------,------------------------ I I ---------- --- ------,---------------------- I I -- ---- -----------------------,------------------------ ------ all] ----- Qll] - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I I > r) 00 I I i I I ----------------------------- -------- ---------------------------------------------------- --- - --- ^^ILLWORK STOR, AG` I I ------------ ----------------------------- --------------------------------- ------------------------- I I I Q 111 ---------- ------ ----------�-- ----------------------- > ---------------------1> C F- U cn ----------------------------- M --------------------------- i LOADING DOCK "IETAL ROOF � ^1ETAL �1DINCs 1 I 1 - l_O.AC NG DOC °DELIVERIE: S O\%=RNcAD ^DOORS SOUTH =LE-VATIOM ISI tlt in QJ F_ llJ W UA j G U AC�IITECT: J03: ,`,�,'� �r� . LOCALE: DWG. DATA: D SAIL'" !G "10. DONALD A. DILE-NIS P.0.DOX 7, /.:3 MAIN RO�<D r, �.,�� .IVB,. LAD C3 F L '� Ccri R.J [MdW[ERHEb%[0 � '�, -•^-a* D A, 4, � `� � *. d GREENPORT T® U, C�- Cl1TE'OLD 4IJFFOLK COUNTY. Ii�tY SCALE: I" = W -O" JOB *t0• 9404 DATE: ME IM 11 t�ii AQUE-130GUH-, N.Y. BUILDINGC ieJ SUPPLY r .,.... $� ,r"' �o e' I. l —. — — ,.CTI t 1000--14-1-1 1 7Z - V . R-, MA!"� 'Ot�D l':T.2) G"EE°.PO".T, ?dY p > p p Q lT. D n E I Mj � �_ ,a A T �'�' _E U Ll L�1 ! Or= A2 N.O.F. H.X. CONSTRUCTION CORP. (HAMLET DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) NOTES: SITE DATA: SITE AREA: LOT 1 (96.511 S -F./ 2.2110 ACRES) LOT 2 062.011 S.F./ 3.121 ACRES) SITE TOTAL: 258.692 S.F./ 5.938 ACRES ZONING: LOT I: ZONING: LIO (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PARK/ PLANNED OFFICE PARK) YARDS: FRONT: 100' SIDE (ONE): 30' SIDE (BOTH) 60' R -EAR: 7=7' LOT COVERAGE: 20% (MAX.) PROPOSED RE—ZONING: LOT 2: (PROPOSED RE -ZONING TO LIO) YARDS 8 COVERAGE SAME AS ABOVE LOT COVERAGE: LOT COVERAGE: 20% (MAX.) (258,692 S.F. x 20% = 51,128 S.F. MAX. BUILDING FOOTPRINT) �[� RETAIL: 1/200 S.F. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OFFICE: 1/100 S.F. OF OFFICE FLOOR AREA WAREHOUSE OR STORAGE BUILDING: 1/1000 S.F. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA STORAGE YARD: I/5000 S.F. OF STORAGE AREA LANDSCAPING: LANDSCAPE AREA: 35% (MINIMUM) (258,(.92 S.F. x 35% = 90,525 S.F. LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED) LANDSCAPE BUFFERS: FRONT YARD: 25' PERIMETER (SIDE/REAR): 9' BUFFER TO RESIDENTIAL ZONE: 30' 9) RE -ZONING PLAN = 30'-0' ARCHITECT: JOB: SCALE JOB N( DONALD A. DENIS P.O.BOX SG5 SITE LAYOUT: RIVERHEAD n DtttJJJ ROVERNE&D OL�DO ppL� DATE: REY:AI N ROAD BUILDING SUPPLY VVVM AQUI=BOCsUE. N.Y. MAIN ROAD GREENPORT� NY25) -0 (51G)�22-351f OT4,v ZONING g OARD OF APPEq S � �2 GERARD P. GOEHRINTOWN R OF SOUTHOLI) CHAIRMAN JAMES DIN-114,1-10'C�r� TOWN HALL LYDIAORA P.O• BOX 1179 A TO Cc7r Cp j/i�,S 53095 MAIN ROAD LINDA KOWALSKI, BOARD SEC. SOUTHO 6D NY 11971 DhCf1 FAX ) 765-1809 Is = 30'—O' co,.._ - #(s16) 765-1823 ): 9401 I 8 JULY 1994 / ___- �T�r �- -- - __ ----7 __ ____�- , ~/ ' �. ~ `� � ' `' ! i ` ` ' `��' '� �� �` `'~�,'. ' _. � ^ �`, / /�/ '�\~ ^ '^-- =-� ` �11 � `- �Cf / �`°. 11 ,­ ',D��F :)-, rj-'- - E A, R I IN f:ti,z, I __ -_ - . . 1,�_ M ) -_ -,---- % __ .-- I 1p___1 .: i�R i , - "' L \ .f T 77 -ID!F I- - � !:� . , - - - - _ _____ _____:��::� -�_i�) � �� /I 1�3 \ __� ,_ ���� I I .. . -1 7 J.f ____ --,-- .f 7 �j IF _, __ . -/4',; �/ , / '�/,/­�_t- I � --- - * -�_ —�_: -,I- T ,�, ____�, r, ) . , T.& +41'�, , . - 'f 7 71 _ n /­'�� ,� ." 1__"�,4 - - --��-, -q,,r:-S V - �.'X I S T 1,1:,� � . NE - K-AtIP DOLUN , - � �, -�, i, ,,_��,r R,�: E 5 1,-'� N 1�,�j [LAWN 1� " T -C 14 8 _3 _.- ­ � -____ O� p �,\,l � ,r­j� , _.-;.� % G N � M - - /! . ; "�, ­ -f 7 _ 'c' a 0 ju v, �� . -ql- (C , OLE I ; _"7- . " I , . ., 1, " I . . . LOT 1 (9�511 SF,/ 2.1110 ACRES) V rt 01 ,, . - 4� �* --,* � -� -, .. . . . � x "' / * LOT 2 (1.'2,011 S.F./ _3_1_,I ACRES) / \ I- M � k . �_._ . . ,\ I I . . . . , T,C! +49.L ,, u ,,, - � C. , + A 8 \;(-, __ @ V_ , - ,�- UIL- (� t �c�,�,�,,,,_�_e . . .. . I _/ . . - "d , o/N, �?'- I . . . I_ - I/ , , . A k- ,z: " I E, i . IL ___;2 Z. ____��, -.0 " - 547'", I -0 , - , ,�)7 ,,(a)), 0 � — — (3) — — I 11, �,(^5)z�-) _:w� ___- _ T ­_�_ _\5 1 __ � u�u��� S.F. ^�u� = �/.u� ���� n�x� �U|LU|�� �UU|��|N|) . ___- i�� V� � �__-(�YD,_­ _-, . SANITAR r/ PARKING: ' RETAIL: 1/200 5,F. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OFFICE- |/|()O 5.F� {)F OFFICE FLOOR AREA ' /-� � ' ���EH{}U5E �� 5T{)R�GE BUILDING: |/|L�0{7 5f. ^'4y� ' �� ' - {}F GROSS FLOOR AREA /�\� TC ' c�/ '~' - STORAGE YARD. |/SO{)O 5F. OF STU��GE � ��� � ----- ARE�� ' / /�\ `��' ^' ' c --_- ' \�/ r- . T.C. +483 48.8 Z),EF"S�� cj,4 T,� �z^ ��l'�� ---�� �� - �/ �����������' . I� ^ `i �c ^�as 3. -- '''' LANDSCAPING: i�\ / ' ' r [> �" ~S^~' JA, _' - .� �`44_1_�__�C'1'111_ � o 11 - ` k�, 9_�_ r( - _ �) f �_ , - - / 0\, ' - _ - - I - - / /ASF _1-1 7 fi ,� ,,- , S, �_ /,4 �, i ) )_ � lo /_ Lf��[}�C/�PE A�E�, �5� <�|N|�UM) -����___-- �T-(]^ I f / -- - - -----_ ��« ��«/ ' '�. 00. (n58��2 �F ^ �5� ~ �(]�25 5F L4��5CAPE ��E4 RE(JU|�ED> -----'/-- ' / ' ou - -~ - ^ ''� � ' (�\ _ �f,-i�^ t} _-_ ' � .�. �. ��' / /. .. ,_- � .�_ / _-- .. "-` ~' . �/ ' ___� _ �� --_ ./ ��.. L��ND�(�APE BUFFERS. /c) / —�_� ' '^ ` ' ' // ---� ---- ' �'�"ATC. � . � � , FRONT Y�R[}� 2�' '~- ' --' 'T�~1�+e� ` --'-'--^ /� `-`��' -- /' ' ` 448' / 5� ��'���z � '- / « / ~ ' | -' : ' u �� ----��- � -���z�/ --' _ // / � --_+� ' ^�� ��/+�o�o � � � PE�iMETE� (SIDE/REAR), �' � � �c) � ' e��- ' A J � / -- ^� 7� / � � - '/ '�������� ,� / �' � ourr�m /u ���/u�m///�� �wm�� �c/� - I . _ I I . I . .. l L`i, . L; .- - / /1: ___ - _::� ,_ & - - ­ - - - .0 " . ___ - - '___ - - - __ - - - . . I I : ��) \\ _____ % . . .1-1-1 o ___ - i IV , , ------- / r__j - - - I - - . -1 --- I . . PROPOSED SITE PLAN: -:I---____ I . . I � F: / . . . -, , '� �{2U/4�E F{}DT�(�EEL -41 1 " EXISTING `u --- ' .� �' ~ / RETAIL: 835O 5 F " . , / OFFICE: �5(} MOO( AL S.F. / WAREHOUSE: �|�2S S F �Ou :1 161/ TOTAL: 5(].�25 �f� / LOT COVERAGE: (LOT | � 2) |� 5� � / P��B�|�G. '�(�' / ~"" --EILLE'-- L) �� / RETAIL: 8350 Sf./2(7{}= �18 SPACES --- ' � ~_' (�) BAC - ` ' ` ~ �/ � � � DFF|(�E. ��O 5��/|O{)~ � � SPACES / --- - v�� - -- `. �< LEA(�H|N-`^--^' WAREHOUSE: �|��5 S F /|()�JO= �| � 5pACES* ` \�/ � / --.` P{}DL� `^ / STORAGE y���� |5.O�� � F /5O�D~ � �P��E5 ' -~- ' ��p 'IL T T�T H�� ` \ � » ' �L/ � ` � / / ~ HIGH . . - ` ' _- . ,�� . , -' TOTAL �PA(�E5 �EC)U|�ED� 9/ 5p4{�E� {� - / ----_- / I TOTAL �pA(�E5 P�{}V|OED 48 �p/\CE5 � ' / ^' ' ` ' ^�^ u�- . � ^ . � -` . � / ----- ` �P��� ' / '�-�o ' ' - - ' ' � r ,w��e. u��c o ��G COw |��J�pOe�Ts5 _ � � /- - {} ` ' �uJ / xTc���� De � ' `�' " / /vs-T��u 5Env|��m�/C� �nou�D �EDu�e -. '| / OUTDOOR PARKING REOu/RcNswT5. - ----_ «�, ' \ _ `-x7� ' / / ` - �-- --- ` /� � '� -- .. ' ` '� / ` / !�,,4TE _- / ____ 4. � �LP-9 , . � / ' �` / -- � `/ / ` - ' / � / / .-�z. ++�o� - - -- ``� � . / / '� ` ' ' `- - -- - L � T/� +�as' � / ' 6���VE� ` --- -- / - - / r �� � -' / \ - -- -- ' ` /���� +1�O� ~ - -` ' O� \\�� �` -�.' ~ -- -_ / ��~� -- / B ^474' ./ ` � ' � '' - \ - � -- --- -- ' ' ' �a] '� � `` / ` ~ --- --- ' ' ' � ' � '' ` ' . ` . . . _' - , . .. -._�....*.. . . � / ^ / \ x^�� ' -- / -`�\ � / � --` / // / 7--- � �^--� ' f ' � \ � ^'�� '�' ' � / �p�sox/:��p v�0 ` `^�r� / / / / `��_ / ,' '' ---�_ // / ��� / - _,^, �|^ �' «����:/ � \ �'`. '.''�.`' � ~/\j\i����^�w'U\/ / � ' . '14 | ) '' -' - i \ / PuoL/c WATER) ` / `EX15TIN- . (__ , \___ EXISTING TREES t _� p 0 a ,p_ . - I / I - , _"Z. - - - I GRAVEL - --- ,S--- I / �, , .. -------�� — -_ _, I \ - - - - / \ __ - __ --- � 17 --- 0 --- VIP , . __ - , / ___�� \ - - - __ __ - - I - - - / / / / I 11 5 _- . ll �D -11 ­ - - /_ , - -.- I - -, ) / ; 11 I ) / .** / I/ / , / I \ I- -1 /__ _,_ __ __ - , __ , --- --------- __ � / / / / __ __ - - - / / - - - - - , - . - - __ - __ - __ - - I � / �__, / / 1-1 "I i I ! 1, .. /; / / __ I - - / -1/7 - J , I / / I - _11 I / I .. . / I / 1. - __ - - - - - I . / / - - i - - - -, - I I / I I /i 481 __ - I / I I/ .- . ,,--- 11 I i I - - - - __ __ - I // , / / 1 / __ __ __ 11 i - ,/" , / Z, 11 I - __ .;__ i I : / __ __t______ I - / - __ - / ; / I/ I . I ,/ - - - - - / --I ,/ �, - - T __ -171,l / __ _71 (�- I / . , I 1 +4�, . - .- - - - / I / - - __ __ /_ - - - - - - I/ -./I -, 1�_ I I — __ - - __ ____ I- 'I, I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THERE WILL DISCHARGED FROM THE BUILDING AND / ' - / �s -- ' THERE W�LBE NO TOXIC OR ' / ~ 1-1 ' ---^�~-// -HAZARDgUS MATERIAL STORED D AT \ � ' _ - -__. - 7 THE SITE UNLESS SPECIFICPERMITS '---- � JR EXEMPTIONS ARE GRANTED ' / / / / PURSUANT TOTHOSE ARTICLES. / . 7___ / / ' -- / ' ----`_ / FA[1UTT[A4NEF�5��GNATU��E / � / ---_ ' �- --_ / ' / _- - '' ` / . - / ` '' ' _ _ __ _ _ _- _ _/ ' � ' / / .' _- -_ -- . / . / -' --� \ / -- - '' / DATE �� . 11 . - `` /` \ / / - -__ / / / �\ \ -^ ' ~ ��� -- -_- '' / '- . ' -� . ---_- ' - _ ' - / / '' / � � . \ e" _ �----/ - () ~' ' / - - «/ ° / .' / ' \ ` / � ` �� / -_ -- _-' \ � / - _-- '^ - ` ' / // .' -__ -- -_ -- / / - - ' �� � - � � /' ^' -- .` ~ . / ' '� - - \, `^ --`-_ / , / -9 -r � .~~- / ,` ' / � \ ` ~' -- _ ., `- . / ' {7 v � '/ / ��^, ----- - ' ~. ---- -- ~r'�(� '^'�j� / .' / `` / � ` _- -_ ' / '' ` / �.. . / '/ `_��- � -- . --`-`- -_ / ,' / '.'' / `^ / / - ^ _ - / / `` ''/ � / � /' `` ----�-�--- �� -- -- -- - -- / '' / '' -- -- -� -- -- / SYMBOLS: x��A �� /' / ` ~��� / -- / '^ / ---- ~- ~�� � U �K���°���~��^ �n � \ 8 / , � �� -��=-- ' / / `` -- - ' � / / / / ~. / �� / -- -- / -^ �/ ~ �/ �� . 7 / ` ���, �� ^` / `. ----- / � / / / / / , / ~^- . \ Qy\ / .' � / �^ �`` -- __ - / / . � 1 ` -- . ' . ' \ / -- -- / / \ ' --CSRAVEL ~- / ` � � | ' / 'GRAVEL ' ---- - '- ^_ -- -- -- -- -- -- -^� / / ' u�'^c / -_ -` sx|5T/NG r�ss5 , / ' \ ' --- - ve '' `` / / � - \ - VEGETATION �' / ^\ / ' \ , � . _ I "IREMAIN THIS ��e� / / ' -`- / ^�� 7 ` ^~ / ' / �- -. ' ,'-� 8» - -- � -,-~ , / / T ^� � --- ,. ``` / ' ' \ "` / 6� - � - / �--- -' `�, \ / / +� �� / . `` /` ' ` -_-- ~' / \ ' \ ` ' `` --_ ' \ / / / / / -- -_�- ^�� � -' / / \ . \ - l��' ~_ -_-_ _~ ' / / � � -- -- `` / ' / \ ' ' i ---- \ /'' / / \ / '. --_ --- -' / / / / \ � \ / -- � ----- ` '- '' '' '' / \ / / / \ � \ / Da�om�6 -�---���_ � '' ^ '''^/' / \ / / / \ .' \ / ��s� � ' �� -____ _ -- '~ /' ', ' » '' ^' / \ / ' / / � / ` ' - - --- ' ~' ' �� .' '- / / / / \ J� ' / ` �/ / `--_ / � 0u/ / 1/1 .' /� '' J` _. / /K 5YM DESCRIPTION TC TOP OF CURB BC BOTTOM OF CURB TG TOP OF GRATE TL TOP OF LID IFIF FINISHED FLOOR R RADIUS EX EX15TING 10.2 EX. ELEVATION +10.0 NEW ELEVATION \ '\ I / / . / . / � / \4. � '' '~ / / / / / . / \ �� ' / '' / ! / � ' / \ DRAIN ' '' - ', '- / / / / / / _� ' / / \ ` -1 I' / \ ^� / ^ -- -'` / / / ' / ' \ / -�-� / C� "�� ' , _ - - - - -- / / ' \ / - � +�Tf� �4�p / , ~ ~'-- -- \ ' / / J� � \ / \� | / __ / / \ 0 / /c£/ -�' '/ // ' /'-'/' ' __-- \ / /� �� / / 8�~%��^�� ������_ / ' --~_ /� ' �� / `� ~- \ � -� i4�� / / ���U U U��U � SITUATE- ����������T, NT /V � � \ /' �5�- _/�' / \ -- ' / / // '/ / /' � ~ ~ / '��) /�� / / `z � �| � �G���-�'`--- / \ \ / ' --` y~-�~-_ C, \J) / .� \ -----�~ / . - // / /� / / / .�� ^' \ / / / �� ' \ / � I ,C k. I � \ I ; / , 7' R"A p7p c ­., / ,/ ___ - / / z , -1 � / / \ 11 t L . / -___ : , - .. .... .. . ��_ 1� / I I / ` . -'`` -- ' � ` ~ \ �' ~- ~`� / / / \ / �-- ' ' / \ � .- '' `\ / � / \ ' \l 11 \ / � I � \ \ \AREA 8 ' / \ / / \ �. \ . \ -- -_ -- -- _- ' / _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _\_ / / ' \ \ \ _____ . / / \ / / \ �\ \ \ / \ / . \ �/\ ' \ \ . / . / \ -- -- -_ __ _ / . .' / \ ' \ ' \ ______ \ . e��-u / � . / ~- _ _ _ _ \ / . / �r� � / \ . \ _- -_ -- ' � \ / �� ' \ ' ' / / / ' \ ' '�� / ' / / / \ / � \ '' \ � + -~ l ' / / , ,' \ Em5T|m� / r/ ' / ' / / ' / / ` / �' \ \ \ ED6ED�mO0D5-,' r / \ / . / / / / / / \ ' \ �``� �' / -^'- \ ' / ' \ � ^�'~ _________ / / . / / . / / � ' � \ / \ \ / ^' ~' ' +� 8' / \'' ' ' `� -- ` \ / \ \ * `� // /�~' / / '' / ' / / � '� -- \' ' \ \ '/ �'� / '' // / / .' / .'"�)� -`�� / / & ' ` . � | � \ ' � / , /" wr �'' ' _~'~ «�`� / / ' , / Y� ^� / t7 � � \ ` `` ' ' '� �^ / ' ' / / ' m� ' / � \ \ ` \ \ �, / / / » " / " / / \ / '! \ _ \ �' �----« - ' » » / / Ili/ ' 76 -^ \ �. �^ ,- b , , / � / \ /� \ rn «` � _� -- " \{\/� v \/ / / / / / �� `' \ ' `_� ' .~ " �___-_� ° ��~ ' / / \ \ 7D �� ` � / / / . / / co / ^' \ ` \ �` �: / \ Ex�T�� T��s� ^ / / / / / \ / � \ -{ \ .' .� / ^-VEGETATION TO / / // ' / ' \ / / \ .' / �� \ + �� y REMAIN IN THIS *Rs� y � / \ / \ �� . / / \ m / �- / / / EDGE OF WOODS / / '�' / ` / / �e�� ' / ' \ �� \ \ ' � ' / / \' . . - . ''� . '�, ,�'�T �,''{�^�`�7� '� � / / / \ ��������0 ____---- ___��' / ' ' / / � � |� �� �0 so �11/ \ ------------- ---- � ��� U.���� P... J� .................... .- - . _� \ � --_____________ |� ��B����`--_____----�---~~_��'��� P �����8� I : ^__�_-�-�-»l�-°--�c�^�=.nL-_,__`___~___ \ ���________________�������_�_________ ________�__ , �� ���^ , �o_____~--- "�, - / �_�4"\�'4�~0 �^ \ � --------___-___---------- ��-----\�_�_��� ^ / ' �_� / ._________________ ________ _/ � � -_ ______ / _______ �~_�� �--� _________________ _______-�_______ � ' -_____ __ -____ ____ 1.2___ 1f,3___ I____ LI __ __ ___ ___ DONALD A. DENIS P.O.Box GLS ' RIVERHEAD . E R N Fc� [0 BU�L[D�HCc- SUPPLV R � V, vd TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY, NY JOB NO: 9LO-4 DATE:: 11 JUNE 1991 REV 0 MAIN ROAD BUILDING SUPPLY t% SCTMU 1000-41-1-1 1000--iL_-1-2.1 -:23 JUNE 1991 fis:dhs) AQUEBOGUE, N.Y. MAIN ROAD (RT.2r) 15:�[HR[FHMD (0'_—�cff3 V&1_13)[o . 2L AUG. hil(SCHD) 3'-O„ MAX. SLOFE -- 1/12 3/4" EXPANSION JOINT P. CO C. SIDEIIALK, SCORE ICOR 5' O.C. JMARKS 1 VARIABLE SLOPES (Ill IN.) INCREASE AS NECESSARY TO ATTAIN 1/12 SLOPE -0" 30', DRiVLlAY WIDTH --- 3/4" EXPANSION JOINT DRIVEWAY PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0" DIMENSION "C" SEE TABLE DWG N0, T -I SIDEWALK, CLASS F, ITEM 10608.OiO3 -IDEW L.K '�11DT TO MA CH EXISTING CURB SNOW STORAGE STRIP (MATCH EXISTING WIDTH) GRASS STRIP - CONCK--ETE -- C,ARB. TYPE A 'ITEM 11_.0'128011 1/2" = 1'-0" 5'-O"(t)* SIDEWALK I OFFSET STRIP *(MATCH EXISTING WIDTH) 3'-0" DESIRABLE 1/4" PER FT. (MIN PITCH) —_ v ITEM 608 0101(4') ITEM 2031 SIDEWALK SECTION 1.'2" _ , -O" CURB/PAVING TRAFFIC BEARING ASPHALT DRIVEWAYS It PARKING AREAS NYS D.O.T. (MEET ALL TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SPECIFICATIONS) 4' MIN. I VARIES I ITEM 164031'3 1 1/2" TOP P.CONC. 1 CURB SAL C'JT 1 GRADE E\ISTING PAVING W 9� e NOTE. THE END OF CURE ----- �_-- c� NOT ABUTTING EXISTING OF TRAVEL LANL —�' -- ___-- CURB SHALL BE RAMPED DOWN TO 7ERO HEIGHT ITEM 18014031335 1/2" ENDER ca REVEAL INTHE LAST 10 A' LO_,- I IONS G ------ F, FACINTRAFFIC. TEM 41311 5 1/2" EASE ! 1 ITEM 1069.2801 ITEM 11304 ICII A O E E -� CURB INLET BOX NYS D.O.T. T t PE NI^ "FRAM (U,TH NON-MOUNTAE_E C1:RE EOX) I I 1 I i I i, ( `EEL RE' CI ',NE ESR O,R:.TE j ITEM 655 05 ' I I �I I CURB BOX (NJN-MOUNTAELE) ITEM 655.05 DRAINAGE RING (TYP) P CONC I 1\2" NYS TYPE ` CURB IA MIX GRADE 2 1/2" COMPACTED' BITUMINOUS MIX I k i COMPACTED BAS7- NOTE: DRAINAGE PIPE I COVER/ GRATE FROM DOw'NSPOUTS TO TO GRADE OR DRAINAGE RINGS TO BE ( BuRIED CONCRETE 6" PVC PIPING(SDR-35). !'-C" TO COVER (SEE PLAN) DRAINAGE P:PE 2'-0" PRECAST CONNECTING DRAINAGE COLLr R CsRAE,E K!N`.;S iN PAVED AREAS SHALL 6E 12"(� CORR. i POLYETH r LENS PIPE. 1• - TRAFFIC BEARING, ,i SLAB tt� cl- 3-O„ i PRECAST DRAINAGE RINGS I I. i „ F •�- ------------------ CL ARANO �I SEt_ECT s� ' ,... GRANULAR FILL � _I ca 5.+.:W.. GROUND Wt; T EK' ---4------------------------------L-------------- DRAINAGE SCHEDULE: E1iT IYt'0LE `: IN Q' IATION FROM: McDO.ALD GEOSCIENCE SOUTHOLD. NY �— EL +"48.5' 0 �. DARK BR OW14 l' SILTY LOAM (OL) BROWN LOAMY SILT (ML) BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAND (SW) WATER WATER IN BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAND (SW) LIGHTING F XTUPE SCHEDULE: P05T MOU14TED Il5W METAL HALIDE FIXTURE, "SENTRY" MODEL NO. SUB-NLIIS-MH OR APPROVED EQUAL, "COLONIAL -TYPE" , BLACK FINISH, MOUNTED ON L "x L" x 12'-0' HIGH WOOD POST. CH-..•MFER CORNERS, SHIELD FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES 0 GROUND I-OUNTED ISOW FLOOD (DUPLEX r -.S INDICATED) -¢ RECE55EV SOFFIT FIXTURE N., I 1 1' I RJAD � I �HO'.iLDER' I I u'Ui . '�� �L ! ? Krt-~!I� l.'�' ��'L �\ i !IVU J ARE " DESCR'.PTION AREA (S`� T) 2" RAIN 5'-O"(t)* SIDEWALK DRIVEWAY FULL HEIGHT---, NORMAL SIDEWALK *(MATCH EXISTING WIDTH) FT 66 1 CURB71.. y (1) 6 x 8'-6'° DEEP D >~'tinGL RING ELEVATION 2 EAST DRIVE t PARKING 8180 S.F. R0Jt -RETAIL (EAST) 4x18 S F 12,886 S.F. In6 FT. 'f— / (8) 10'4 x 6'-6" DEEP DRAINAGE RINGS 1/4" PER FT. N_--RTH PARKING AREA 851: S.F.166 3/4 PFK' ---=--------- FT -- - --------------- 1438 C F. 4 tt EST DRIVE t FAR,.IN :; 97135 S.F. ROOF -RETAIL (wE-ST) 3928 S F 13,On,, S F. 166 FT. 2168 C.F (8) IC's x 6'-6" DEEP DRAINAGE RINGS 222h C F 5 (EST ENTRANCE D iV 840 S.F Ion FT. 7186 C F DRAIn. (1) 84 x 4'-0" DEEP NA(:,E= RiN':� 169 C.F. L ROCF-WAREHOu`E t --ST, 21,562 S F 166 FT 3519 C F (8) 10'¢ x 1'-0" GEE" DRAINAGE RINGS 3636 C.F O ROOF -WAREHOUSE (E,=ST) :1,562 S.F.166 FT. MIN. SLOPE= 1/4" PER FT. WIRE FABRIC ITEM 10608.0103 DRIVEWAY SCORE I MARK 15-18" CURB SECTION I I 890 C.F. NOTE: THE FIRST FULL 5' FLAG OF SIDEWALK GROUND COVER -0" I TO EITHER SIDE OF DRIVEWAY SHALL BE C THICK, ALL DR>, NAGE RINGS '-,HALL HAVE ,= TR, FFIC BEARING TOP SLAB AND A CAST IRON COVER 0R C, RA, TE SET :'�T THE SPEc_IFIED ELE`,i =,T10, N DR,41NAGE RINGS SHALL BE CONNECTED AS SHOiwN �_. T H 12''+ CO R, RUCli .TED POLYETHYL=NE: PiFE- . --- - f WIRE FABRIC REINFORCED ITEM 10 08 0103 DRIVEWAY SECTION SNOW STORAGE STRIP (MATCH EXISTING WIDTH) GRASS STRIP - CONCK--ETE -- C,ARB. TYPE A 'ITEM 11_.0'128011 1/2" = 1'-0" 5'-O"(t)* SIDEWALK I OFFSET STRIP *(MATCH EXISTING WIDTH) 3'-0" DESIRABLE 1/4" PER FT. (MIN PITCH) —_ v ITEM 608 0101(4') ITEM 2031 SIDEWALK SECTION 1.'2" _ , -O" CURB/PAVING TRAFFIC BEARING ASPHALT DRIVEWAYS It PARKING AREAS NYS D.O.T. (MEET ALL TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SPECIFICATIONS) 4' MIN. I VARIES I ITEM 164031'3 1 1/2" TOP P.CONC. 1 CURB SAL C'JT 1 GRADE E\ISTING PAVING W 9� e NOTE. THE END OF CURE ----- �_-- c� NOT ABUTTING EXISTING OF TRAVEL LANL —�' -- ___-- CURB SHALL BE RAMPED DOWN TO 7ERO HEIGHT ITEM 18014031335 1/2" ENDER ca REVEAL INTHE LAST 10 A' LO_,- I IONS G ------ F, FACINTRAFFIC. TEM 41311 5 1/2" EASE ! 1 ITEM 1069.2801 ITEM 11304 ICII A O E E -� CURB INLET BOX NYS D.O.T. T t PE NI^ "FRAM (U,TH NON-MOUNTAE_E C1:RE EOX) I I 1 I i I i, ( `EEL RE' CI ',NE ESR O,R:.TE j ITEM 655 05 ' I I �I I CURB BOX (NJN-MOUNTAELE) ITEM 655.05 DRAINAGE RING (TYP) P CONC I 1\2" NYS TYPE ` CURB IA MIX GRADE 2 1/2" COMPACTED' BITUMINOUS MIX I k i COMPACTED BAS7- NOTE: DRAINAGE PIPE I COVER/ GRATE FROM DOw'NSPOUTS TO TO GRADE OR DRAINAGE RINGS TO BE ( BuRIED CONCRETE 6" PVC PIPING(SDR-35). !'-C" TO COVER (SEE PLAN) DRAINAGE P:PE 2'-0" PRECAST CONNECTING DRAINAGE COLLr R CsRAE,E K!N`.;S iN PAVED AREAS SHALL 6E 12"(� CORR. i POLYETH r LENS PIPE. 1• - TRAFFIC BEARING, ,i SLAB tt� cl- 3-O„ i PRECAST DRAINAGE RINGS I I. i „ F •�- ------------------ CL ARANO �I SEt_ECT s� ' ,... GRANULAR FILL � _I ca 5.+.:W.. GROUND Wt; T EK' ---4------------------------------L-------------- DRAINAGE SCHEDULE: E1iT IYt'0LE `: IN Q' IATION FROM: McDO.ALD GEOSCIENCE SOUTHOLD. NY �— EL +"48.5' 0 �. DARK BR OW14 l' SILTY LOAM (OL) BROWN LOAMY SILT (ML) BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAND (SW) WATER WATER IN BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAND (SW) LIGHTING F XTUPE SCHEDULE: P05T MOU14TED Il5W METAL HALIDE FIXTURE, "SENTRY" MODEL NO. SUB-NLIIS-MH OR APPROVED EQUAL, "COLONIAL -TYPE" , BLACK FINISH, MOUNTED ON L "x L" x 12'-0' HIGH WOOD POST. CH-..•MFER CORNERS, SHIELD FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES 0 GROUND I-OUNTED ISOW FLOOD (DUPLEX r -.S INDICATED) -¢ RECE55EV SOFFIT FIXTURE N., I 1 1' I RJAD � I �HO'.iLDER' I I u'Ui . '�� �L ! ? Krt-~!I� l.'�' ��'L �\ i !IVU J ARE " DESCR'.PTION AREA (S`� T) 2" RAIN VOLUME I`L^ u �,L:,l _!J FT ) DRAINAGE STRUCTURES VOLUME PR,' VI✓Fr. (CU FT.) I EAST ENTRANCE DRIVE 14 C-3 F FT 66 1 ., �32 C F y (1) 6 x 8'-6'° DEEP D >~'tinGL RING t33 C F 2 EAST DRIVE t PARKING 8180 S.F. R0Jt -RETAIL (EAST) 4x18 S F 12,886 S.F. In6 FT. 2134 C F (8) 10'4 x 6'-6" DEEP DRAINAGE RINGS 222, C F 3 N_--RTH PARKING AREA 851: S.F.166 FT. 1423 C.F. (3) 10'� x T-0" DEEP DRAINAGE RINGS 1438 C F. 4 tt EST DRIVE t FAR,.IN :; 97135 S.F. ROOF -RETAIL (wE-ST) 3928 S F 13,On,, S F. 166 FT. 2168 C.F (8) IC's x 6'-6" DEEP DRAINAGE RINGS 222h C F 5 (EST ENTRANCE D iV 840 S.F Ion FT. 7186 C F DRAIn. (1) 84 x 4'-0" DEEP NA(:,E= RiN':� 169 C.F. L ROCF-WAREHOu`E t --ST, 21,562 S F 166 FT 3519 C F (8) 10'¢ x 1'-0" GEE" DRAINAGE RINGS 3636 C.F O ROOF -WAREHOUSE (E,=ST) :1,562 S.F.166 FT. 3819 C.F. (8) 10'w k T-0" DEEP DRAINAGE FLINGS 383b C.F. 8 SOUTH AREA 15-18" S (2) IC'v x 6'-6" DEEP DRANA ;-: RINGS 890 C.F. PACHYSANDRA TERM. I FLATS GROUND COVER ALL DR>, NAGE RINGS '-,HALL HAVE ,= TR, FFIC BEARING TOP SLAB AND A CAST IRON COVER 0R C, RA, TE SET :'�T THE SPEc_IFIED ELE`,i =,T10, N DR,41NAGE RINGS SHALL BE CONNECTED AS SHOiwN �_. T H 12''+ CO R, RUCli .TED POLYETHYL=NE: PiFE- . joc:s: 4"w'°. ggD SAI�I`Iyr°; Y C ,LCULP'-MONS: Gt!'M SONE IV, YIELD. 600 GPD FER ACRE COMMUN'iTY WATER SUPFLY IS PROVIDED BY GREENPORT WATER AUTHORITY YIELD= 600 GPD/ACRE PERMITTED DENSITY = 5.938 ACRES x 600 GPD/ACRE _ ;,562.6 GPD DRY STORE FLOW: 0.03 GPD PER S F. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA QTY. NON-MEDICAL OFFICE SPACE: 06 GPD PER S.F. GROSS FLOOR AREA BOTANICAL NAME t.�AREHOUSE SPACE: 04 GPD PER S.F. GROSS FLOOR AREA NOTES PROPOSED BUILDING: DRY STORE-- 8350 S.F. 1 NON-MEDICAL OFFICE USE- 450 S.F. ACER SACCHARUM WAREHOUSE USE-- 41,625 S.F. BtB FLOW (PEI` SUFFOLK 8350 S.F. x 0.03 GPD PER S.F. = 250.5 GPD COUNTY DEPT. OF 450 S.F. x 06 GPD PER S.F. = 2-1 GPD HEALTH DEFINITIONS 41,'25 S.F. x .04 GPD PER S.F. = 1665 GFD OF "USE") TOTAL PROPOSED FLOW = 1942.5 GPD I PROPOSED DENSITY: 1942.5 C -PD / 5.938 ACRES = 3271.1 GPD/ACRE BETULA POPULIFOLIA SANITARY SYSTEM: CLUMPS SEPTIC TANK, O SEPTIC TANK L"/ (2) DAY FLOW): 1942.5 GPD x 2 DAYS = 3885 GAL. T5UGA CANADENS15 USE 4000 GAL. SEPTIC TANK- (2) 10'-0" C' x 5'-0" DEEP RINGS LEACHING: FOOLS: 44 SANITARY FLOW: 1942.5 GPD JUNIPERU5 VIRGINIANA LEACHING RATE: 1.5 GAL./S.F./DAY SIDEWALL AREA REQUIRED: 1942.5 GFD DIVIDED BY 1 5 GAL/S.F./DAY = 1295 S.F. SIDEWALL AREA PROVIDED: (10) 10'-O"' X 4' 6" DEEP POOLS = 141:, S.F. _d JUNIPERU5 CONFERTA USE (10) 10`0"d x 4'-6" DEEP POOLS w/ TRAFFIC BEARING DOMESC.I. COVERS I' MIN./2' MAX. 8" TRAFFIC LID COLLAR HEIGhT fl ITi INLET -IX = FLOW LINE MIN. PIT C.+H I,� E PER 1 I yl v vl CAST IRON _COVERS F.CONC COLLAR TRAFFIC BEARING DOME y = OUTLET ',IN _T_ ---=rte y 7 L` �' -FTF`, :w_ -j MIN. PITCH 1/8" PER I' (3; e"GPIF E (20 SEPTIC TANK [� ['' L A _, ' "(,."1:N TO C 1 C0V1_R "4 ^0 PIF'c . "(MA\: -TO GRADE I 8' FSR i' -_ s\-,I.00VER AT GRADE EL + y (TYr-.) MIN PITCH EL +46.5 4"(Z CLASS 2400 PIPs— - T -77--K-r­ -4 P.00NC r - i 4" PER I' !INS ERT �`L +45.2 �EL C E MIN. F!TCH EL +4_�-moi -- , _!� ---- ---- V — < DON SLA6 t i- -- - --- L +c4 8 r _ LP-Id2 I LP -3 c <r� I 18"DROP T�' e. 71.8.9,10 - EL *40 3' c�►-------------------- REO' _CLEARAN= - ---L6---------- ♦ - -`-i - ----------------- i------i-N_�----- R --- ----- 1 +- ---L--------- DRf,INAGE RINGS SANITARY SYSTEM W'' F=c DOME LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE: REF.it QTY. COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME 5iZE NOTES M 1 SUGAR MAPLE ACER SACCHARUM 2 1/2" CAL. BtB P O BRADFORD PEAR PYRUS CALLERYANA 2" CAL. BtB B I GRAY BIRCH BETULA POPULIFOLIA 8'-10' CLUMPS H O CANADIAN HEMLOCK T5UGA CANADENS15 L' HIGH C 44 EASTERN RED CEDAR JUNIPERU5 VIRGINIANA C HIGH J 13 SHORE JUNIPER JUNIPERU5 CONFERTA 15-18" GROUND COVER Y 18 AMERICAN YEW TAXUS CANEDEN515 15-18" A O PINK AZALEA RHODODENDRON SPP I5-18" Z 11 RED AZALEA RHODODENDRON SPP 15-18" S 0 SPURGE PACHYSANDRA TERM. I FLATS GROUND COVER LOCALE: Dk/- i ii4G INFO - n SCALE: I" = 20'_0" ToLiN OF 'GUTHOLD JOB No: IL04 u'FF0LK CGU: NTY, PAY 5uTi I;. 1700 r;p-i--I FAL: V.: 2 ,.i::: I'i ; i (::,.::,.;;a Ivii DRAWING NO. S2 OF 52 1,,. v„ 1�, 3`ti,