HomeMy WebLinkAbout4547APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
James Dinizio, Jr.
Lydia A. Tortora
Lora S. Collins
George Horning
o �
CA x
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
ZBA Fax (516) 765-9064
Telephone (516) 765-1809
FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION
REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 23, 1998
Appl. No. 4547 - RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY CO.
PARCEL 1000-46-1-1 and 2.1
STREET & LOCALITY: Buildings #74610 and 74500, Main Road (State
Route 25), Greenport, NY
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: March 23, 1998, May 14, 1998 and
June 11, 1998
PROPERTY FACTS/ DESCRIPTION:
The above -identified property is located on the south side of Main Road,
Greenport, and contains a total combined lot area of 5.938 acres. The
"re -zoning plan" site layout map RZ-1 dated July 18, 1996 prepared by
Donald A. Denis, Architect, has been submitted to show the land area
and footprints of the two existing buildings. Also submitted are
drawings dated June 11, 1997 for a proposed principal building, with
retail area at the northerly front portion, and remaining areas
consisting of vestibule, design center, receiving and office areas,
inside storage areas, accessory lunchroom and mechanical room. Buffer
areas are shown around the perimeter of the property, and an outside
uncovered storage area of 15,000 sq. ft. located in the easterly side
yard.
Also shown on the plan is an outside storage area which is proposed to
conform to the current accessory use regulations for this LIO Zone
District. No building or canopy area is proposed over this storage area
and there was no basis addressed in the Building Inspector's Notice of
Disapproval with respect to this part of the plan.
BASIS OF APPEAL: Building Inspector's January 2, 1998 Notice of
Disapproval which reads as follows: "...1) the proposed structure being
located in an LIO District is permitted to have a maximum of 60 feet of
frontage on one street. The proposed building is approximately 115 ft.
facing Rt. 25. Pursuant to Article XIII, Section 100-133C; 2) When
fences are located in or along side and rear yards, they shall not exceed
6-1/2 feet in height, pursuant to 100-231B...."
AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED BY APPLICANT: The applicant
is requesting variances regarding: 1) an increased width of principal
building from code limitation of 60 feet to 115 feet wide facing Route 25
(a/k/a Main Road) in this Light -Industrial -Office (LIO) District; and
(2) Fencing up to 8 -ft. in height along side and rear property lines.
Page 2 - June 23, 1998 ZBA Meeting
Appl. #4547 - Riverhead Building Supply
Parcel: 1000-46-1-1 and 2.1 (combined)
REASONS AND BOARD ACTION:
Based on all testimony, documentation, personal observation of the board
members, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and
relevant:
1. Applicant proposes to construct a metal drive-thru warehouse with a
showroom/building supply store at the front. The total square footage
is approximately 50,424 sf. The 115 -foot width is proposed to allow
vehicles to enter to east side of the building to pick up drywall,
roofing, lumber and similar supplies, and then pay at the exit on the
west side. The smaller store in the front would contain a showroom and
smaller supplies.
2. The applicant has submitted an extensive landscaping plan for the
entire property and has agreed to help mitigate the visual impact of the
width of the building by moving it back to a distance of 110 feet from
the Main Road in order to provide an additional 10 -foot landscape buffer.
3. The property contains a total of 5.9 acres and has 325 feet of
frontage on Main Road. The adjacent properties are commercially zoned
and developed property, with the exception of a residential condominium
complex to the east.
FOR THESE REASONS, the Board determines as follows:
In considering this application, the Board finds that a variance for an
8 -foot high fence, and a variance for a building width of 115 feet are
the minimum necessary and adequate and at the same time will preserve
and protect the character of the neighborhood, and the health, safety
and welfare of the community.
1. Grant of an area variance will not produce an undesirable change in
the character of the neighborhood or detriment to nearby properties.
The proposed lumber yard supply building is a permitted use in the LIO
District. the use is compatible with adjacent commercial uses, and the
large size of the property and extensive landscape plan will provide a
sufficient buffer from the residential/ condominium complex. The 8 -foot
high fence will provide security and protection of the public as well.
(2) The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some
method, feasible for applicant to pursue, other than an area variance
because the 60 -foot code limitation would not permit room for storage of
material and for vehicles to have sufficient clearance to maneuver safety
in the drive-thru operation proposed.
(3) The requested area variance is substantial and represents a 95+ -
percent reduction in the code required 60 ft. minimum width. However
the specific location, large size of the property and extensive
landscaping proposed help mitigate the degree of the variance.
(4) The difficulty situation has been self-created and relates to the
applicant's desire to establish a drive-thru type of lumber business that
requires a large -width structure in order to operate.
Page 3 - June 23„ 1998 ZBA Meeting
Appl. #4547 - Riverhead Building Supply
Parcel: 1000-46-1-1 and 2.1 (combined)
(5) The proposed variance will not have an adverse effect or impact on
the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district
because the property is a large commercially zoned parcel, and the
proposed use is in keeping with many others in the vicinity. The
applicant has submitted extensive landscaping plan for the entire
property and has agreed to help mitigate the visual impact of the width
of the building by moving it back to a distance of 110 feet from the Main
Road in order to provide an additional 10 -ft. landscape buffer.
RESOLUTION/ACTION: On motion by Member Dinizio, seconded by
Member Horning, it was
RESOLVED, to GRANT the variances requested subject to the following
CONDITIONS:
1. In order to help mitigate the visual impact of the width of the
building, it shall be moved back from the Main Road a minimum distance
of 110 feet in order to provide an additional 10 -foot landscape buffer.
2. The 8 ft. high fencing along the most easterly property line shall be
slatted.
3. Accessory open storage of materials and off-street parking areas
shall comply with the provisions of Section 100-131 and 100-101
inclusive.
VOTE OF THE BOARD:
AYES: MEMBERS DINIZIO, TORTORA, HORNING, AND COLLINS.
NAY: CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER (felt that the building width at
115 feet is more than he is willing t9_appr3)ve).
This Resolution was duly
46-1-1
4-1
RD P. GOEHRINGER, C
)ved for Filing 6/27/98
i:ECEIVED AND FILED BY
THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK
DATE (e /a 9/"' HOUR 3,'3 0 am
Town Clerk, Town of Southold
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
LEGAL_NOTICE
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
ZBA Fax (516) 765-9064
Telephone (516) 765-1809
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS
THURSDAY, JUNE 11, 1998
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town
Law and the Code of the Town of Southold, the following application will
be held for public hearing by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF
APPEALS, at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New
York 11971, on THURSDAY, JUNE 11, 1998 at the time noted below (or
as soon thereafter as possible):
5:45 p.m. Appl. No. 4547 - RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY CO.
(Re-op� as per Board Resolution adopted May 19, 1998). This is a
variance request based upon the Building Inspector's January 2, 1998
Notice of Disapproval which reads as follows: "...1) the proposed
structure being located in an LIO District is permitted to have a
maximum of 60 feet of frontage on one street. The proposed building is
approximately 115 ft. facing Rt. 25. Pursuant to Article XIII, Section
100-133C; 2) When fences are located in or along side and rear yards,
they shall not exceed 6-1/2 feet in height, pursuant to 100-231B....11
Location of Property: 74610 and 74500 Main Road, Greenport, NY;
1000-46-1-1 and 2.1, combined as a single lot.
The Board of Appeals will at said time and place hear any and all
persons or representatives desiring to be heard in the above applications
or desiring to submit written statements before the end of each hearing.
The hearing will not start earlier than designated. The file is
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
�0��$UFFO(�-COGS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
c
James Dinizio, Jr.
a
Lydia A. Tortora
Lora S. Collins
uk
George Horning
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
LEGAL_NOTICE
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
ZBA Fax (516) 765-9064
Telephone (516) 765-1809
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS
THURSDAY, JUNE 11, 1998
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town
Law and the Code of the Town of Southold, the following application will
be held for public hearing by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF
APPEALS, at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New
York 11971, on THURSDAY, JUNE 11, 1998 at the time noted below (or
as soon thereafter as possible):
5:45 p.m. Appl. No. 4547 - RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY CO.
(Re-op� as per Board Resolution adopted May 19, 1998). This is a
variance request based upon the Building Inspector's January 2, 1998
Notice of Disapproval which reads as follows: "...1) the proposed
structure being located in an LIO District is permitted to have a
maximum of 60 feet of frontage on one street. The proposed building is
approximately 115 ft. facing Rt. 25. Pursuant to Article XIII, Section
100-133C; 2) When fences are located in or along side and rear yards,
they shall not exceed 6-1/2 feet in height, pursuant to 100-231B....11
Location of Property: 74610 and 74500 Main Road, Greenport, NY;
1000-46-1-1 and 2.1, combined as a single lot.
The Board of Appeals will at said time and place hear any and all
persons or representatives desiring to be heard in the above applications
or desiring to submit written statements before the end of each hearing.
The hearing will not start earlier than designated. The file is
Page 2 - Legal Notice`✓ -�
Hearings for June 11, ,1998
Southold Town Board of Appeals
available for review during regular . Town Hall business _ hours (8-4
p.m.). if you have questions, please do not hesitate to call 765 -1809 -
Dated: May 20, 1998. BY ORDER- OF THE. SOUTHOLD
TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS
GERARD P. GOEHR.INGER, Chairman
\ TOWN OF SODTHOLD s"v,
V° f2�0 syr BUILDING DEPARTMENT ;
SOUZiiOLD, N.Y_
.NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL
1 DkT -Fannarp 2 1998
To Patricia -Moore Asa, • AJC., Riverhead, Bldg,, Supply CO -
315 Westphalia Rd._ P.O. Box 483
Mattituck NY. 11952
PLEASE. TAKE NOTICE that your application dated ... Oct..22---------- . 1997_..•.
for,permit to ........................... at
74610
Location of Property74500___•,•••__,-_ Main Rd. Greenport
'-__.___..._- _.....
House No. Street Hamlet
County'Tax Map No. 1000 - Section .46 ...... ._ BLOCK ... 01...... LOT :O1_fi 2.1
Subdivision ........_...................... Filed Map No. .........Lot No........
is returped berevith and disapproved on the following grounds 1;)32e.prnpD_ged stj:=tux_e......
being located in an LIO District is permitted to have a maximum of 60 feet of frontage
on one street. The ,proposgd,building, is, approximately, 115'_ facing Rt<_ 25. Pursuant. _
to Article %III 300-133 (C). 2) When fences are located in or along side and rear
................................................. ....................... ....................
Xhrds they shall not_egteed,6',feet_:in_height.__.Pursuant to Article_ 100-231 B.
Action required by the Zoning Board of Appeals.
NOTE: The proposed building will occupy two separate lots.
....................................... -.......
---------------
BU G NSPEGTOR
RV 1/80
FORM NO. 1
TOWN OF SOUT
BUILDING DEPAR
TOWN HAL
SOUTHOLD, N.Y.
TEL.: 765-18
Examined .................19... �U
Approved ................. 19 ... Permit No........... .
Disapproved a/c .....................................
"RO,iFD OF HEALTH .........
`,3 SETS OF PLANS ..........
SURVEY ......__. ... ..
IT C1IECr ....................
p} _. SEPT.IC FOtttl . ..... .
] (� P n n- rt 1—
— hoTIipy b.Denis 722-3511
..CALL .....____. .... ...
OCT G 3 1�, :VA I L TO
F Box 565
uebogue,,NY `1Y93i
............................
(Building Inspector). `
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
Date ..................1 19...
INSTRUCTIONS
a. This application must be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector, with 3
sets of pians, accurate plot plan to.scale. Fee according to schedule.
b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets
or areas, and giving a detailed description of layout of property must be drawn on the diagram which is part of this appli-
cation.
c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit.
d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issued a Building Permit to the applicant. Such permit
shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work.
e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose whatever until a Certificate of Occupancy
shall have been granted by the Building Inspector.
APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Budding Permit pursuant to the
Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable haws, Ordinances or
Regulations, for the construction of buildings, additions or alterations, or for removal or demolition, as herein described.
the applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws; ordinances, building code, housing code, and regulations, and to
sdmit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections.
(Signature of applicant, or name, if a corporation)
PO Box 565,Aquebogue, NY '11931
..............................................
(Mailing address of applicant)
State whether applicant is I3iVI§ �Ievs eeX a��Xarchitect, ! Ixztorrt cltal t iail7r i �ii�txiiii ?r
Ranald.A..Denzs,.A.I,.,A„_P;C. (Architect)
Name of owner of premises ... Riverhe.ad .Building.....Supply...
....................:..................................
(as on the tax roll or latest deed) '
If applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer. .
...............................
(Name and title of corporate officer)
Builder's License No. . ,Not Selected
Plumber's License No. .. . .....................:
Electrician's License No. .,t .......1! ....... .. .
Other Trade's License No. n .... .%............ .
74500 Main `Road, Route 25, Greenport, NY
Location of land on which proposed work will be done. ... ............................... I .......,..
............... ............. ........ .................... .....................................
.
House Number Street Hamlet
County Tax Map No. 1000 Section ......46..:....... Block '.... 1 .......... Lot ... 1. .
46 1 2.1.'
Subdivision ........................ Filed Mup No. Lot ................
(Name)
State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction:
a. Existing use and occupancy ..Bua•lding. Supply. ........................:................ .
b. Intended use and occupancy Building Supply Sales . _ _ • .. , • , , .. .
t
X
3. Nature of work (check which ai5plicable): New Building .......... Addition .......... Alteration .........
Repair .......... . ... Removal ............... Demolition :.3 , .. ..... Other Work ............. .
(Description)
4. Estimated Cost $1, 500, 000:00 ........... Fee ......................................
.........................
(to be paid on Filing this application)
5. If dwelling, number of dwelling units ............... Number of dwelling units on each floor ................
Ifgarage, number of cars ........ ......................... .......... I .............
6. *If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use .....................
7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front ............... Rear .............. Depth ...............
Height ............... Number of Stories........................................................
Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: FrontRear .
Depth ...................... Height .............. Number of Stories .... .
8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front .... J-1.5.'. • Rear ...11? ........Depth 7 i
....
Height 32 ... .....Number of Stories ..Oite:.(1 i ........ ..................... .
9. Size of lot: Front ...3251............... Rear ....394 ............... Depth .693!................
10. Date of Purchase Approx. AM9 ................. Name of F rme O vner Fl e L bex ................
11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated . , L10 Id t �n*ustria� p'ar
1 Z: Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation: ........ Yes. , , , _ . , , , , ,
13. Will lot be regraded .... Yes .. 11 fill be removed frornr��sdd No
14. Frame of Owner of premises Riverhead E�uil........ ; McWT a der Av 727, , , .. .
d re lost . P.......:InFRW No.. .
Name of Architect Dortaid•Denis, .A.I.A_, P..C•.. Address ?' Pg� 565. Ml� ? ogue _ Phone No: .7-22-351.1 ... • . .
Name of Contractor . Not. Selected ............. Address ................... Phone No:.............. .
15. Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? *yesc....... No.........
*If yes, Southold Town Trustees Permit may be required.
PLOT DIAGRAM
Locate clearly and distinctly all buildings, whether existing or proposed, and: indicate all set -back dimensions from
property lines. Give street and block number or description according to, deed, and show street names and indicate whether
interior or corner lot.
1. See attached Site Plan.
* Occupancy consists of: Retail 8,350 s.f.
Office 450 s.f. r -
Warehouse 41,625 s.f.
TATE OF NEW YORK, S.S
:OUNTY OF .................
...............................
(Name of individual signing contract)
Bove named.
e is the
being duly sworn, deposes and says that lie is the applicant
(Contractor, agent, corporate officer, etc.)
said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this
)plication; that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that the
ork will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith.
vom to before me this
d ...................... 197.7
Mary Public '..... County
iNa1u, 011Ud S 8!0/10108 .....
�jrYafl4n/��/gcS` (Signature of applicant)
FAMOM
FEB4^ 1998
TOM M&
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK
APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR
�.� [--,�
APPEAL NO. '15
DATE..............................
TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N.Y. QCT pntooe�'
1, (We) Riverhead.Bu�ld ng..Slip.p..1.y...of 129.5...Rul.aski.... SSxeat......... .;...........
.. ........
Corp. Name of Appellant Street and Number
Riverhead NY HEREBY APPEAL TO
........ ....... ............... ... .
Municipality State
THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT NO.... ............................ DATED 10/23./97
WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO
Riverhead_ Bu_ilding.,Su�ply,__c�.o_.Patricia C. Moore
Name of Applicant for permit
of P.O.Box 483 315 Westphalia Road, Mattituck NY 11952
...................................................... .. ........................
Street . . . and Number MuniciP all ty State
( ) PERMIT TO USE
( ) PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY
(x) Permit to construct 115' wide building and fence 8' high
7n Road, pt
1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY ..........4610 .... ..& ....... 74500 ........... Mai ..... . .... .. Green ....... .. or... ..... ...LI0
....
Street /Hamlet % Use District on Zoning Map
District 1000 Section 46 BlockolLotpl 8cu2rJntOwner Riverhead Building Supply
Map No Lot No. Prior Owner Aliano
2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub-
section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.)
Article XIII Section 100-133 and 100-931R
3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for (please check appropriate box)
(X) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Mop
A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap. 62. Cons, Laws
Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3
4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal (has) (has not) been made with respect to this decision
of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property.
Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit
( ) request for a variance
and was made in Appeal No ........... ................... Doted ............... ...r.............. ...................
REASON FOR APPEAL
( ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3
( 3 A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance
is requested for the reason that Two parcels zoned LIO are combined for a 325'
wide parcel on the Main Road, Greenport. The acreage of the entire parcel
for the use will be @5.7 acres. The width; of the building is in proportion
to the size of the parcel, and will greatly add to the character of the area
Forth ZBt (Continue on other side)
w.WW"
REASON FOR APPEAL Continued
I. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties or unneces-
sary HARDSHIP because
7. The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shared by all properties alike in She immediate
vicinity of this property and in this use district because
3. The Vanonce would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE
CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because
STATE OF NEW YORK
ss :..
COUNTY OF ) Signature
Sworn to this ........ day of...... .................. 19��
/G
Notary Public
AVIRICIA C. MOORS
public, Stele of New Yet
Suftolk l ouMY- No.48616W
Commission Expires June 16. `/
rlWAN`a� S®llTHOL4 1`0
�
OWNER STREET �- VILLAGE ' ,` ° i'f DISTRICTS vS16 .LOP
in
I (ihn1S S � � -- E ':Lt� ACREAGE
��~ i _ - 1n
S — W ��r�yx� TYPE OF BUIL' DING`
}� �j
RES. SSS. VL. 40 FARM COMM. IND, CB. �,MISC. I
LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS/ a�JV;/u �o
6/l7/7?'sotp?yY2 aoo i��zAd l✓ FIL!!�`N6'l.aaL$8rt 0 tpJ G'nRF <PG�9 k
4 _ I'' ' _ a a ✓ _ l 1� a s�9 Lid 199�1_ial °
µ
6-0 Ac v
w•^ � rd�.,..a ° g+ds. � �l�444,fi.t,.+f 7 +`a ��:+ue FM' °i .� "x � t+ d�f�a!', e r A Zr
AGE BUILDING CONDITION
NEW – NORMAL BELOW — ABOVE — 79 d /9Ve�-qi.*e - bee—NVI
h.
Farm Acre Value Per Acre ---Value _ / p- "% 3 ''<21 *r tF. • M R J 04,
Tillable 1� ', ' '�^ 0y� <•' �'%� C
Tillable 2
Tillable 3
i
Woodland
Swampland
Brushland
House Plot
Total it
i
'TOWN OF SOUTHOLD' PROPERTY RECORD CAND
`--OWNER
ISTREET 7 ��
VILLAGE —
DIST. SUB. LOT
i U e � 1c. F •� � / 0
h�s< P'�/ _
i� €m v{� tC.�. GI �e ,a,,:..
•�1.,•�./1
FORMER OWNER
N
E
ACR.
I -
S W TYPE OF BUILDING
RE$. SEAS. VL FARM %COMM:. CB. MICS. Mkt. Value
' LAND
IMP.
TOTAL
DATE
REMARKS 9 * vir3 Z. ouel
t
l a o
a oa
%G baa
)6 66 .
79
r�
9 CF—U—AV . L)1,)Q(=- Vi 17--L"
��. `�Ca yi'L✓ �<�� ���•e
��?1'� ': ." .taia,�se�,..�i<:C_,. ;/a Q,�er �i�ss��' l�.„fdluu.1
Tillable
FRONTAGE ON WATER
_R
&Woodland,
..
FRONTAGE ON ROAD
96' 3
Meadowk"►d
,'
DEPTH
700 ,p
r we Plot
BULKHEAD
'y Total
COLOR
TRIM
o\
W 1211 210-10:)
�l
all
u
OWNER STREET JVILLAGEDISTRICT SUB., LOT
ACREAGE ----.
' FORMER N
OWNER
S W TYPE OF BUILDING.
RES. SEAS. VL. „" FARM COMM.: IND. CB; MISC.
LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS,
x,.13✓ -!s}
-do ,lh -fir .a .'tz7=;Nor-�`*a�`.L:'"�'F`,'�''..i"e>} a „zy faw •^r ' .. —'
G>ani �� f',1�c'•e c /uc rye /
4 -
6 `a
( �L7rA
AGE BUILDING CONDITION o �(� a
NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE
Fa�rri Acre Value Per Acre Value
_ 1a
Tillable:'] -1 ,ifs e �
Tillable: 2 —--T(77,—-
Tillable, 3'.—
WoOdland
Swampland-----
rr'� "
�BrUShland�
House Plot ,- � rr Y ��y ' Sa {t < T
i- 1 V am
ffi.m ±2`4� �Ye q,{f 'a, ttri`b�Siy�
��W""....--.
__._ °...a•._..._. K �'`r � �Ku r.Ra 4Ya i`,�" ggas 'o- r ^n
0 M�PRPP ,9'19
MAS'Aloe
AQP
o✓E � ', .: .. - �� � �. " X26
.� O+, -. . - , - _'^ :`.;�'�''`;;==""�' - :.� •x,18. �� .i.
O r .s
;. +w O
_ "fir:. . J� :rf } -� ;�r,• �•� �.':, ��'
o .
i' - - .i: s. "rE r'C • ,,.�'...'il - 'Yf�� ':.%fl.[',c�
Wo
. 1 ,i." _ �a —:C� ��, �;ry• (1'i,'-' .t„�i�' �f ::ti'A,: �•,T :t'�=7V
41i :Ir
� _� ,::V.' '.), `:. � .tib ”<'�` 'r Ci :,.S• ,
sm/.
;Simi � ' � -'' `•` �~ - ` • .. ,
It
cl
\ ':l=r _ .._ •'fie " '`' �'�`',-`'- -
•. rn � _ - .. `.f r,�, e;�?.ham.., '��aa _ .. .��' 'r� «,R_• j�. - ,
gid' _ '� � .. •41 ;-: ..,,y ��:A; • ^t'`� t� Q '
,_1 vC
rf' s
21
, - �'„ E4: t `-/l.,�i•• ..f �:R y�h:_ ' :��' •� rte+? .f•f:\".
/�/� j,• !"• r
. G.4 .:i•.. lY•L:,.�,,� ;,�.��- �Qy �Q :Gs�((�•,'�yy� r*,. �;�' - .� {'`�= fit ..' .,:. � �:,'
y� ' R yl�. ,:1�;•�1 .:X'.'. _ '.� :.i :+a;.. � �t±.•;.Z'rN :,ti.
<
\ _ - �:1. :�4•,t :.P+ 'J'i::itl�r.' y..✓'l•cbyy .p
, , tom„-,1✓•w,'
CONCRC}g• ., - :� iR - i; i. r s`+_ l'? , �.i:. `- r, F
. - Y
u -;,*'•' ,41',v'
`� t- • /�,,�� QS.
9.9
.. - _ •*4:,,.::. �' _, - � �.`t .-.est: z;.•:t
r�.2 E- � r.,.J � �'-�'--- 3 - .�' F�r43YTNIA -' _ - �, •`` h�''4';; - ..
C`: +.
N 730 34' OOa W c,
N/F NICHOLAS ALIANO
VACANT' LAND _
�'GrrYQO B L/Ch�T' daimla'S.S ^
6
- - - � •:�"2 •mac, '
Ar,
r .. Ya '1. ��y1..,,�,t'lf,' _ , , .. <IVV/ l.:i•` •-M�71-+r./.}•1 :. 00. vz
IN
tL,,
Po
... MO.L
"4p
Y
N IN N.V-."-M
W__ Qd
Z7
CIVV5 - i
05 lPy.
1.0
Aj
MNi v- dY
sm-
M ,Avi
W4
Y�q_ + ,r2 .s+i, S 1, - •:C�.If` •�'�-�� :, V.- :P• t
C
e qw,� ��
I. ������'�al.�� �a':i ri+ ' - s,., _; s' ;..;, 'fitK,3 ,'.'� wr... c� }:s p;' -'.1 •-r..
IVA
o o
oo/,
e) DO vdg to
A -1,
rVjAw Ow Jo4rurAr. , V.f
01
AF
•
.. 4
1,4
wr
T�
k,
x%a
r�-2,
A -1,
rVjAw Ow Jo4rurAr. , V.f
01
AF
•
.. 4
1,4
wr
T�
k,
x%a
i
PATRICIA C. M®®RE
Attorney at Law
51020 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Tel: (516) 765-4330
Fax: (516) 765-4643
Margaret Rutkowski
Secretary
January 15, 2002
Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Riverhead Building Supply
Appl, No. 4547
Dear Chairman and Board members:
Riverhead Building is' before the Planning Board for
approval of the amended site plan. The public hearing
was opened on January 14, 2002 and left open pending
your communication. Enclosed is a print of the proposed
site plan which shows the Planning Board reviewed and
recommended improvements.
The Building Inspector raised two issues prior to
certification of the site plan:
First: Appeal No 4547 granted relief for the width of
the' building to 115, provided that the building
was set back an additional 10 (110 total). In
appeal. 'No ,4547 the front building (along Route
25) was connected to the rear building. Due to
i fire code'. issuesthe new amended site plan
provides for a detached building (building 2).
'Pursuant,, to Section 100-133 (C) "A project
shall be divided into separate structures so
that, no single structure shall have more than
i 60 linear feet of frontage on one street. The
setbacks of multiple structures on a parcel may
vary, provided that the average setback of the
structures meets the setback required above and
all buildings are at least 75 feet from the
right-of-way."
Please note that only Building 1 has frontage on the
road. The rear building is in the "rear yard", behind
the front building, more than 300' back from Route 25.
It was my belief, as well as the former building
inspector's, that the variance ran with the land, the
relief requested was the same (applicable to Building 1)
therefore Riverhead Building Supply could proceed to
obtain amended site plan without another variance from
100-133.
Issue 2: Parking setback has been questioned by Mike
Verity. RBS has complied with 100-132 Bulk, area, and
parking regulations of 100-191 and 100-192, incorporated
by reference. Mike Verity saw your reference to 100-131
in your decision. We believed you intended to refer us
to our obligation to comply with whatever provisions of
100-131 were applicable. We and the Planning Board
believed that we had complied with all parking
requirements, and 100-131 (9) is not applicable.
Moreover, the relocation of parking in order to conform
to a 50 setback would result in insufficient parking at
the retail building, and placement of parking in areas
that the Planning board wishes to keep open for vehicle
and truck access. The Planning board needs to determine
the most suitable placement of parking. Site plan issues
are correctly before the Planning board, 100-131 (9) if
applied as Mike Verity suggests will interfere with good
site plan review.
The Planning Board and staff did not apply this
section of the code with either, the present or the
previously approved site plan. To my knowledge, 100-131
has not been applied to the parking for a "principle
use", in this case a wholesale business, warehouse and
building material storage and sale (i.e. lumberyard).
Section 100-131 (C) is intended to apply to accessory
uses
Moreover, Riverhead Building Supply is a preexisting
nonconforming building (with existing parking, loading,
storage etc.) and a legally permitted use. The amended
site plan is more conforming in all respects. The
parking, landscaping and location of the buildings is
much more conforming than the existing conditions. We
have certainly complied with the intent of the zoning
code.
The Building Inspector has asked that I refer this
request to your board prior to his certification and in
order to proceed with the site plan approval. I do not
believe he wishes to send us to your board for
variances, he asks that your board clarify the decision
granting the variance, and respond to him accordingly.
If your communication is favorable, Mike Verity will be
comfortable with this, the Planning board is ready to
approve the site plan.
Thank you for your assistance, we are very anxious
to proceed with construction, we would ask the board to
consider this request at your earliest convenience.
VIP-ry tr ly yours,
-�'atrlcia C. Moore
CC: Fred Webber
Mike Verity
Riverhead Building Supply
t
0T)ICT Off'
BOARD OFAPPEALS
(516) 765-1809 ZBA tel. Southold Town Hall
765-90 74, &V 5309.5 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
June 29, 1.998
By Fax and Reqular Mail
Patricia C. ,.Moore, Esq...
Moore & Moore
5.1020 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971.
Re: ' Variance Determination (Riverhead Building Supply Corp.)
DearM44-0--Ore:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Appeals Board's determination,
with conditions, regarding the above project.
Before construction activities may be commenced, issuance of. a
building permit is required. Please contact the Planning _Board and
Building .Department directly at 765-1802 regarding further reviews. A
copy of this variance determination has been transmitted to each the
Planning Office and the Building Department for their update.
Very truly yours,
GERARD �'/6OEHRIf KBE
Encl. CHAIRMAN
cc w/ encl:
Building Department
Planning Board
Original filed with Town Clerk's Office
i; . JUL - I
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
James Dinizio, Jr.
Lydia A. Tortora
Lora S. Collins
George Horning
o�oSUFFoc�c�
0
W
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
ZBA Fax (516) 765-9064
Telephone (516) 765-1809
FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION
REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 23, 1998 - . .
Appl. No. 4547 - RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY CO.
PARCEL 1000-46-1-1 and 2.1
STREET & LOCALITY: Buildings #74610 and 74500, Main Road (State
Route 25) , Greenport, NY
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: March 23, 1998, May 14, 1998 and
June 11, 1998
PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION:-
The above -identified property is located on . the south side of Main Road,
Greenport, and contains a total combined lot area .of 5.938 acres. The
"re -zoning plan" site layout map RZ-1 dated July 18, 1996 prepared by
Donald A. Denis, Architect, has been submitted to show the land area
and footprints of the two existing ' buildings . Also submitted are
drawings dated June 11, 1997 for a proposed principal building, with
retail area at the northerly front portion, and remaining areas
consisting of vestibule, design center,. - -receiving and office.= =-areas,
inside storage areas, accessorylunchroom and mechanical room. Buffer
areas are shown around the perimeter of -the property, and an outside
uncovered storage area of 15,000 sq. ft. located in the easterly side
Yard.
Also shown on the plan is an outside storage area which is . proposed- to
conform to the current accessory use regulations for this LIO Zone
District. No building or canopy area .is proposed over this storage area
and there was no basis addressed in the Building Inspector's Notice of
Disapproval with respect to this part of the plan.
BASIS OF APPEAL: Building Inspector's January 2, 1998 Notice of
Disapproval which reads as follows: "...1) the proposed -structure being
located in an LIO District is permitted to have a maximum of 60 feet of
frontage on one street. The proposed building is approximately 115 ft.
facing Rt. 25. Pursuant to Article XIII, Section 100-133C; 2) When
fences are located in or along side and rear yards, they shall not exceed
6-1/2 feet in height, pursuant to 100-231B...."
AREA VARIANCE RI
TED BY APPLI
is requesting, variances regarding: 1) - an increas
building from code limitation of 60 feet to 115 feet
(a/k/a Main Road) in this Light -Industrial -Office
(2) Fencing up to 8 -ft. in height along side and rear
[T:- The applicant
3d -width of principal
wide facing Route 25
(LIO) District; and
property lines.
Page 2 - June 23, 1998 ZBA Meeting
Appl: #4547 - Riverhead Building Supply
Parcel: 1000-46-1-1 and 2.1 (combined)
REASONS AND BOARD ACTION:
Based on all testimony, documentation, personal observation 'of the board
members, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and
relevant:
1. Applicant -proposes to construct a metal drive-thru warehouse with, a
showroom/building • supply store at the front. The total ,.square footage
is approximately 50,424 sf.- The 115 -foot width is proposed to allow
vehicles to enter_ to east side of the building to pick. up. drywall,
roofing, lumber and similar supplies, and then pay at the exit on the
west side. The smaller store in the _front would contain a showroom and
smaller supplies.
2. The applicant has submitted an extensive landscaping plan for the
entire property and has agreed to help mitigate the visual impact of the
width of the building by moving it back to a distance of 110 feet from
the Main Road in order to provide an additional 10 -foot landscape buffer.
X. The property contains a total' of 5.9 acres and. has 325 feet -of--
frontage on - Main Road. The adjacent properties are commercially zoned
and developed property, with the exception of a residential condominium
complex to the east.
FOR' THESE REASONS, the Board determines as follows: -
In -considering this application, the Board finds that a variance for an_
8 -foot high fence, and a variance for a building width of 115 feet are
the minimum necessary and adequate -.and . at- the same time will preserve
and protect the character of the neighborhood, and the health, safety
and welfare of the community.
1. Grant of an area variance will not produce an undesirable change -in
the character of the neighborhood or detriment to nearby properties.
The proposed lumber yard supply building is a permitted use in the LIO
District. the use is compatible with adjacent commercial uses, and the
large size of the property and extensive landscape plan will provide a
sufficient buffer from the residential/ condominium complex. The 8 -foot
high fence will provide security and protection of the public as well.
(2) The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some _
method, feasible for applicant to pursue, other than an area variance
because -the 60 -foot code limitation would not permit room for storage of
material and for vehicles to have sufficient. clearance to maneuver safety
in the drive-thru operation proposed.
(3) The requested area variance is substantial and represents a 95+ -
percent reduction in. the code required 60 ft. minimum width. However
the specific location, large ' size of the property. - and . extensive
landscaping proposed help mitigate the degree of the variance.
(4) The difficulty situation has been self-created .and relates to the
applicant's desire to establish a drive-thru type of lumber business that
requires a large -width structure in order to operate.
Page 3 - June 23, 1998 ZBA Meeting
Appl. #4547 - Riverhead Building Supply
Parcel: 1000-46-1-1 and 2.1 (combined)
(8) The proposed variance will not have an adverse , effect or impact on
the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district
because the property is a large commercially zoned parcel,. and the
proposed use is in keeping with many others in the vicinity. The
applicant has submitted extensive landscaping plan for the entire
property and has agreed to help mitigate the visual impact of the width
of the building by moving it back to a distance of 110 feet ' from the Main
Road in order -to provide an additional 10 -ft. landscape buffer.
RESOLUTION/ACTION: On motion by Member Dinizio, seconded by
Member Horning, it was
RESOLVED, to GRANT the variances requested subject to the following
CONDITIONS: -
1. In order to help mitigate the visual impact of the width of the
building, it shall be moved back from the Main Road a minimum distance
of 110 feet in order to provide an additional 10 -foot landscape buffer.
2. ' The 8 ft. high fencing along the most easterly property line shall be.
slatted . �.
3. Accessory open storage of materials and off-street parking areas
shall comaly with the ..provisions of Section 100-131 and 100-101
inclusive.
VOTE OF THE BOARD:
AYES: MEMBERS 'DINIZIO, TOR:TORA, HORNING, AND COLLINS,.
NAY: CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER_ (felt that the building width at
115 feet is more than he is willing to ve) .
This Resolution was duly ADOPTED 4-1)
R ARD P. GOEHRIN ER, C AIRMAN
pproved -for Filing 6/27/98
46-1-1
777.
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
.) kJ
MEMORANDUM
1'
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
J
TO: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman, Planning Board
FROM: Ed Forrester, Building Department ;
DATE: July 14, 1998
RE: Riverhead Building Supply, Site Plan
SCTM# 1000-46-1-1 and 2.1
The Building Department has determined that the provisions of Section 100-
131 C(9) do not apply to this project.
AUG
JUL 15 1998
Southold Town
Planning Board
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
ROBERT J. GAFFNEY
SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
July 9, 1998
Town of Southold
Zoning Board of Appeals
JUL it, 41998. N! i H( I
I
STEPHEN M. JONES, A.I.C.P.
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A 14-14 to 23 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code,
the following application(s) submitted to the Suffollc County Planning Commission is/are considered
to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county -wide or
inter -community impact(s). A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an
approval or a disapproval.
Applicant(s)
Municipal File Number(s)
✓Riverhead Building Supply
4547
Pliaconis, Christopher
4559
Shank, Robert and Ann*
4560
Segrete, Dominick
4568
Frazzitta, Joseph*
4570
Millis, Walter
4571
Chatpar, Prem**
4574
Gaston, Frank
4575
Snyder, Charles
4576
Ratti, Albert and Janice
4580
*Alternative relief appears warranted
*With the understanding that the garage will not be used for sleeping quarters.
GGN:cc
C:\111CC\ZONING\ZONINGkWORKING\LDSIJUL\SH4547.JUL
LOCATION
H. LEE DENNISON BLDG. - 4TH FLOOR ■
100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY
Very truly yours,
Stephen M. Jones
Director of Planning
S/s Gerald G. Newman
Chief Planner
MAILING ADDRESS
P. O. BOX 6 100 IN (5 16) 653-5190
HAUPPAUGE, NY 1 1 788-0099 TELECOPIER (5 1 6) 853-4044
o
N7 Z
OFFICE OF
BOARD OF APPEALS
53095 Maiu' Road,
- Southold, NY 11971
(1-516) 765-1809 tel. (1-516) 765-1823 fax .
Pursuant to Article of the S3ffolk C =ty dmini strative Code, The
Board of P=eals of the Town of Southold, New York, hereby refers the follcwi nsl
to -the Suffolk County Planning ('C; =iss: nan:
X_ Variance_ from the Zoning Code, Article XIII Secti on 100-133C a n d
Section 100-231B
Variance from Determination of Southold Town Building Inspector
Special Exception, Article . , Section
Special Permit
Appeal No:.4547 Applicant: Riverhead Building Supply
Location of Affected Land: 74610 and 74500 Main Rd., Oreenport, NY
.County Tax Map Item No.: 1000- 46-1-1 and 2.1
Within 500 feet of:
Town or Village Boundary Line
Body of Water (Bay, Sound or Estuary)
xw State or County Road, Parkway, Highway, Thruway
Boundary of Existing or Proposed County, State or Federally Owned Land
Boundary of Existing or Proposed County, State or Federal Park or other
Recreation Area
Existing or Proposed Right -of -play of any Stream or Drainage Channel Owned by
the County or for which the County has established Channel Lines, or
Within One Mile of a Nuclear Power Plant
Within One Mile of an Airport
Comments: Applicant is requesting permission, to construct proposed
structure in an LIO District —building width and fence height
Copies of Town file and related documents enclosed for your review.
Dated: 6151) l9�
6, / W i"V/
J
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. �D�j Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
ChairmanC P.O. Box 1179
WILLIAM J. CREMERS Cz 2 Southold, New York 11971-0959
CA
KENNETH L. EDWARDS �y • �� Telephone (631) 765-1938
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. Fax (631) 765-3136
RICHARD CAGGIANO
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
OCT � ,� 20oi
TO: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector
FROM: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer
RE: Riverhead building and Supply
Main Road, Riverhead
SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1
DATE: October 10, 2001
The Board of Appeals granted a building width variance on June 23, 1998, for a site plan
approved by the Planning Board on August 10, 1998.
This August 10, 1998 approved plan was never built. A new application has replaced the
previously approved plan. The new retail building is 115' wide, as was the original
building, however it has a different footprint. The original storage build was connected to
the retail building and was also 115' wide. The new storage building is 91' wide and is a
separate building.
Do these changes require a new width variance by the Board of Appeals?
Cc: Zoning Board of Appeals ✓
i I � SUFFot�
�o co
I� ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE c 1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
TOWN CLERK y P.O. Box 1179
p Southold, New York 11971
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS 7i �� , , Fax•(516) 765-1823
MARRIAGE OFFICER ��,( �� fi" Telephone (516) 765-1800
RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
August 12, 1998
The Southold Town ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE will meet on
Wednesday, August 19, 1998 at 4:30 P.M. in the Meeting Hall at Southold
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York.
AGENDA
1. Riverhead Building Supply, Greenport
2. Petrocelli Winery, Peconic
3. Farmstand, Cutchogue
Elizabeth A. Neville
Southold Town Clerk
Committee Members
Town Board
Town Attorney
Chief of Police
Supt. of Highways
Departments
Newspapers
Radio
News -_1.2 "... .
O7'FTCE 0
BOARD OFAPPEALS
(516)'765-1809 ZBA tel. Southold Town Hall
765-90 74, far 53095 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
****.** It
C,6
� 3pla ,o
By -Fa" x and Regular Mail
Patricia C. Moore, Esq.
Moore & Moore
51020 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
June 29, 1.998
Re: Variance Determination (Riverhead Building Supply Corp.)
Dear M&iore:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Appeals Board's determination,
with conditions, regarding the above project.
Before construction activities may be commenced, issuance of a
building permit is required. Please contact the Planning Board and
Building Department directly. at 765-1802 regarding further reviews. A
copy of this variance determination has been transmitted to each the
Planning Office and the Building Department for their update.
Encl.
cc w/ encl:.
Building Department
:.� Planning Board
Very truly yours,
CHAIRMAN
Original filed with Town Clerk's Office
Vl
pA,
5
9
IIS,,Andrew J. Ficurilli
58 Wilmarth Avenue
"Greenport, NY 11944
" -- --=3--June 2, 1998
Town of Southold
Zoning Board of Appeals
P.O. Box 1179
53095 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Dear Board Members,
I am writing this letter in lieu of a personal appearance at the
public hearing to be held on June 11 in reference to the Riverhead
Building Supply Corporation application for the Greenport project.
Concerns have been raised by residents of the Driftwood Cove complex
with regard to fire safety. The proposed building will be fully equipped
with fire detection and suppression equipment that meets or exceeds
the applicable fire codes. The lumberyard in its' current state has
no such systems, and poses a much greater hazard should a fire occur.
It appears that Riverhead Building Supply Corporation has carefully
planned this project, especially in the area of fire safety. As
an ex -Chief and current member of the Greenport Fire Department, I am
pleased with their efforts. They should be granted the necessary
variances in order to proceed.
Sincerely,
7_�0/'
Andrew J. Ficurilli
WAINCO FUNDING, L.L. C.
LICENSED MORTGAGE BANKER
NYS Banking Department
11939-0603
May ,3.1, 1998
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Board -of Appeals
Southold Town Hall
P.O. Box 1179
53095 Main Road
Southold, N. Y. 11971
Re: Riverhead Building Supply
Addendum
Dear Mr. Goehringer;
Tel. (516) 477-0388
Fax (516) ,477-8286
This addendum, is to formerly object and remind Mrs. Moore, wife
of Councilman Moore. that her statement concerning outdoor storage is
erroneous. The proposed building plan, shows the east side of the
outside storage area which will accommodate the toxic material,
to be uncovered. This uncovered site increases the incident of
accident ratio by at least tenfold. Since this area is not monitored
by smoke detectors or the physical presence of a watchman, .it is a
disaster waiting to happen,
In the matter,of Mrs. Moore's erroneous statement, she should be
. reminded...as ...a...,sworn officerof the court, and. a Member. of the local
Bar Association the penalty of perjury.
' Apparently, Riverhead Building Supply, has the best interest of
the Town of Riverhead and its residents by fighting the Home Depot
Shopping Center on Route 58. But, in the case of its Greenport yard,
they effectively are saying "THE HELL WITH GREENPORT AND ESPECIALLY
THE RESIDENTS OF DRIFTWOOD COVE.
very truly y o rs,
r�
JOHN J. FARRELL
JJF/11
a
PATRICIA C. MOORE
Attorney at Law
51020 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Tel: (516) 765-43301, i
Fax: (516) 765-4643 1 199� II,
Margaret Rutkowski
i,'; Secretary
May 21, 1998
Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Riverhead Building Supply - Appl. No. 4547
Dear Chairman and Board Members:
Your clerk was kind to advise me that the Board had adopted a
resolution at a Special Board meeting reopening the closed hearing
on Riverhead Building Supply. Please be advised that we object to
the Board's action. There is no legal authority in Town Law 267-a,
the Southold Town Zoning ordinance at section 100-271, or adopted
rules of procedure which authorize the Board's action. Moreover,
your action is unnecessary.
The only issue before your Board is a variance for the
building width. We are satisfied that the record before your
Board, after two public hearings,, addresses the standards to be
considered for a variance and the unique design and use of the
proposed building. We are presently before the Southold Planning
Board for site plan review and all issues related to site plan are
being properly addressed by the Planning Board.
It is my understanding that your reason for reopening the
hearing was regarding the storage of materials. The site plan
submitted to the board accurately depicts "bulk lumber storage".
I have reviewed a copy of the transcript from the March 23, 1998
hearing (May 14, 1998 hearing transcript was not available) and
found no discussion of material storage, or inconsistent statement.
The site plan was before your board and both the board and public
had adequate time to ask questions regarding the plan. Material
storage is not relevant or material to your decision.
In addition, "wholesale business, warehouses and building
material storage and sale" are permitted uses in the LIO zoning at
section 100-131 A.(3).
Riverhead Building Supply is a lumber yard, every item that
they stock will be displayed and stacked on racks inside the
proposed building, the customers will buy material from the racks;
however, this does not eliminate the need for material storage.
The material storage is fundamental to a lumber yard use, is a
permitted use in the zone, and is unrelated to the variance
application.
Therefore, this variance should be granted. The grant of the
variance is supported by the facts, the record is complete, and we
are confident that we could defend in court the Zoning Board's
grant of the variance.
We ask that you reconsider your resolution to re -open the
hearing and grant the variance.
Very truly yours,
atricia C. Moore
PCM/mr
cc: Allen M. Smith, Esq.
Riverhead Building Supply
�® �nc.Qosures
s
I
I �
, �G )L+�
g :,
Page 43 - Hearing Transcripts
May 14, 1998 - Board of Appeals
lew/�L
May 14, 1998 Hearing
Southold Town Board of Appeals
7:25 P.M. - Appl. No. 4547 - Application by RIVERHEAD BUILDING
SUPPLY. Continued hearing from March 23, 1998 for Variances
based upon the Building Inspector's January 2, 1998 Notice
of
Disapproval which reads as follows:
1) the proposed structure being located in an LIO District is
permitted to have a maximum of 60 feet of frontage on one
street. The proposed building is approximately 115 feet facing
Rt. 25,. Article XIII, Section 100-133C;
2) When fences are located in or along side and rear yards they
shall not exceed 6-1/2 feet in height,. pursuant
to
100-231B..."
Location: 74610 and 74500 Main Road, Greenport; 1000-46-1-1
and
2.1, combined as a single lot.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER : I guess we are ready. Mrs. Moore?
PATRICIA MOORE, ESQ: Thank you. This evening the Goodale
Family is here representing Riverhead Building Supply. Mr. Smith,
Allen Smith from Riverhead, co -counsel, and we are here to answer
any questions you might have. When I went back to my file I
realized that it has been quite some time since we had the last
hearing. I know that you have an extensive record on the history
of this legislation, and we discussed the unique nature of this
project and the design elements of this facility and the use of the
facility and if you have any additional questions since that date -
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: What happened with the Planning Board?
MRS. MOORE: The Planning Board, I went to the Planning Board.
And they wrote to the Zoning Board a response saying that they
reviewed the application. I had gone into them and said, our
preference obviously is to stay where we are. We put up the green
stakes so that you would see where 100 feet falls; and in fact, when
you are there, you noticed that the Seven -11 the 100 feet is actually
a little bit behind the back end of Seven -11. So as you move the
building back, I think it probably is going to detract from that line
of sight because now you're going to really see the back end,
Seven -11 back end. Nonetheless we went to the Planning Board and
said, we just cannot move the parking. We can do anything but
move the parking. They said, well, they had no problem with the
original plan. They came back and said that they would, if we
moved the building back by 10 feet and increased the green space
by 10 feet, the parking remains where it is, and the way to solve
the concern about the view of the parking, is that there'll be some
low lying shrubs, green shrubs that will on the side of the road, on
the Main Road and block the view of the parking. Certainly nothing
that is going to interfere with parking and accessing, pedestrian
r
Page 44 - Hearing Ti-aul'scripts
:_May 14, 1998 - Board of Appeals
assess. But, it'll all be done through the site plan process. But,
that's one way of hopefully resolving some questions that the Zoning
Board may have had. So you know, it'.s obvious. Our first choice
and the law, the code allows us to be where we have proposed to
be. In fact, the average setback is about 40 feet and we're back at
100. If we can move this process along because they are certainly
they're poised to begin - we're delayed at the site plan of stage
because of this variance (request) . If they're willing to
compromise, they've told me that they're willing. Certainly not
something that they're happy about, but if the Board cannot get a
consensus for purposes of approval, we will agree to your
alternative relief. So, if you choose to impose alternative relief.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Alright, any questions of the attorney
for the applicant? Alright; we will then go on and ask if there is
anybody else in favor of this application that would like to speak?
Mr. Hulse: Mr. Chairman?
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Mr. Hulse., , how are you tonight Sir?
MR. HULSE: My name is Fred Hulse. I live at 35 Sunset Lane in
Greenport and I just came to speak in favor of this because I think
Mr. Goodale is trying to do something for the area, and his original
proposal looked very good to me. It's going to make the area much
more attractive then it is now without the piles of lumber laying all
around. The building looked pretty good, from what I've heard of it
and that area is certainly not going to detract from it, a bus garage
and telephone building and a light plant and there's . never going to
be anything behind him, except railroad tracks and marshland. So,
I think it behooves the Board to move this along and let the
business man get going.- It provides a lot of. employment in the area
and of course any extension also provides taxes to, the Greenport
School District plus the Town of Southold. So, I think the. Board
would be well to take this under consideration and give the man his
due and let him move along. Thank you.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Thank you. Anybody else would like to
speak in favor? Anybody like to ' speak against? Good evening Sir,
would you state your name for the record please.
MR. FARRELL: Good' evening, my name is John Farrell. I'm a
resident of, the Cove, I call it, other people call it Driftwood Cove
but, I like to call it the Cove. There are 100 residents where I am
and I'm 130 feet away from the 'new building. Now I've done a little
research in terms of demographics. For the quarter ending the end
of March, '325 Building 'Permits have been, issued. So being very
generous, -I'll say 2,000 for the year, alright. We'll say 300 a week
walk-ins or drive-ins, and 200 tickets a week sent out via trucks.
Not very much for 'a facility this large. My only- - point is this to
start, that this part of the building is going to be used by someone
else in the future. What is going_ to be is the best and highest use
would be a manufacturing facility, not a lumber yard or a supply
house because I'll tell you why. Penny Lumber is not going to fold
o L
Page 45 - Hearing Trailscripts
.. May ;14, 1998 - Board of Appeals
their tent and go silently into the night. Every building lot that's
taken up is one less job or complete house that is going to be
built. So where does that lead us? It leaves us with a large
facility and no one to serve us.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Thank you. Is there anybody else would
like to speak against the application? Yes, Sir, state your name for
the record.
MR. RUTKOWSKI: Anthony Rutkowski. Based on the .development
at this hearing, there is no evidence whatsoever of the hardship
or other legal requirements rationale to the granting of such a
variance, and indeed the record indicates that the applicant's desire
of such a variance is based solely on convenience. It is my
understanding that convenience is not a legal basis or granting of
any variance,. let alone any drastic variance such as been required
which doubles the permitted size of the premise. We also continue
our objection to the absent support, excuse me, on the absence of
any supporting traffic or environmental impact studies substantiating
the effects of this requested variance. I wish the Board would
reconsider this, a lot of important things going on down there and
you know, there's two sides to every story. Thank you.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER : Anybody else like to speak against?
(None) Mrs. Moore, anything in rebuttal? I have a question for
you.
MRS. MOORE: Just to touch on a few points that were raised.
First of all, it is a unique design. We did go through an extensive
record; and the submission of the area variance criteria were
submitted in writing on the original application. In addition, the
history of this Code is really what we're addressing, and whether or
not it was even intended to address this type of use. But we did
go into that extensively, and I don't what to make a very long, turn
this into another long meeting.
Secondly, the fire issue, this building will be sprinkled.
We've explained that or responded to that question previously -and in
writing, in writing. So, it is actually going to be much safer than,
I don't want to say it's unsafe now but, even safer than it is
presently. The fact that the materials will be stored, also takes
care of any concerns with regard to the chemicals in the treated
Number 2,
my feeling about the fire hazard here.
I live 130
feet
from an ascendary
bomb. Not too much smaller than
Hiroshima,
if it
let's go.
Alright? Think about what I'm saying,
there's 100
residents that will immediately be put out of home and
could very
well
be burned,
or seriously injured, children and other matters. We
also
have CCA
or, that special treated lumber. which
consists of
arsenic, nothing
else. Arsenic. On fire it becomes toxic.
We don't
have
gas maskS
anymore, that was during the forties.
That's all I
wish
to say, but if this does not be settled now, and
they have
this,
I'm going
to leave you with three words: "Fire,
fire, fire."
Thank you.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Thank you. Is there anybody else would
like to speak against the application? Yes, Sir, state your name for
the record.
MR. RUTKOWSKI: Anthony Rutkowski. Based on the .development
at this hearing, there is no evidence whatsoever of the hardship
or other legal requirements rationale to the granting of such a
variance, and indeed the record indicates that the applicant's desire
of such a variance is based solely on convenience. It is my
understanding that convenience is not a legal basis or granting of
any variance,. let alone any drastic variance such as been required
which doubles the permitted size of the premise. We also continue
our objection to the absent support, excuse me, on the absence of
any supporting traffic or environmental impact studies substantiating
the effects of this requested variance. I wish the Board would
reconsider this, a lot of important things going on down there and
you know, there's two sides to every story. Thank you.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER : Anybody else like to speak against?
(None) Mrs. Moore, anything in rebuttal? I have a question for
you.
MRS. MOORE: Just to touch on a few points that were raised.
First of all, it is a unique design. We did go through an extensive
record; and the submission of the area variance criteria were
submitted in writing on the original application. In addition, the
history of this Code is really what we're addressing, and whether or
not it was even intended to address this type of use. But we did
go into that extensively, and I don't what to make a very long, turn
this into another long meeting.
Secondly, the fire issue, this building will be sprinkled.
We've explained that or responded to that question previously -and in
writing, in writing. So, it is actually going to be much safer than,
I don't want to say it's unsafe now but, even safer than it is
presently. The fact that the materials will be stored, also takes
care of any concerns with regard to the chemicals in the treated
Page 46 - Hearing Trai-iscripts
May .14, 1998 - Board of Appeals
lumber. The fact that they will be under cover, they will be
sprinkled, and they'll be under more controlled environment should
make it even more stable than they are now. And you have a
question?
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: As you know, again we're missing a
Board Member. We had talked the 115 feet, and we know that the
code reads 60, and we know that we're close to almost double the
variance size in reference to what the criteria is in the code
concerning this, and there was some touching at the last hearing in
reference to that 115 feet. My question is 'what is the bare
minimum that could be dealt with in reference to width of this
building - you don't have to answer this question tonight. Ok?
MRS. MOORE: But, let me explain to you because I know you're
asking, is there any lesser sum. We had actually considered a
larger building. This is a reduced version.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: I am aware of that.
MRS. MOORE: And in fact it's 60 feet on a standard acreage which
would be typically about 150 feet road frontage. We actually have, I
don't have the map right in front of me, but, I think we have 300
feet, 350 feet of road frontage. You have the maps there. I can
pull it out. But, we touched on that last time, that the reason the
code doesn't make sense is because it creates a 60 foot requirement
regardless of the road frontage, and we have actually doubled the
road frontage by the acquisition of the extra parcel. So, it is
actually consistent with the intent I believe, if we were to take 60
feet of the original parcel and then 60 feet of the other, you'd have
120 feet in length. We just couldn't put those two together. And
we're creating a better design of the entire property. So I don't
think that that has, I know we talked about it. Do you want to
consider something smaller? I don't think so because I know we've
talked about it. So. This is the size and if it's necessary for
purposes of the proper vehicular access.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Ok. We'll then ask if anybody wants to
speak before we actually close this hearing. Does anybody want to
make any further comments? Anything - that something may not
have been touched upon? Any Board Members have any specific
questions? Ms. Collins?
MEMBER COLLINS: No.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Mrs. Tortora?
MEMBER TOROTRA: No.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Mr. Horning?
MEMBER HORNING: No.
Page 47 '- Hearing Transcripts
.�,-,May.,14, 1998 - Board of Appeals
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Ok. We thank you all for your courtesy
and we will take everything into consideration, we wish you a safe
home and have a good *evening. Hearing no further comment, I'll
make a motion closing the hearing reserving decision until later.
MEMBER HORNING: Second. Motion carried. See Minutes for
Resolution.
End of Hearings.
fRliP{'DI`lis',ICiPi FIT_ Pi -C-1
:r.14: f, wl. 4 4 t + 1.1 .1 -1:
t j I i
+
f t:.i 4. 1 1 f. 4, 1 1 1 A i i r,f + 'i 'A f' 1 4- 4:.} .1..4':I f i +.+'i - -i
+ I T i f 4.
j�
,J:
t 1119
E TER!'? 1:I IAL HODE" T I HE
t"EF -1-1 FICHT
1
DLF,
J,
1j, P-, F
0, -
'T
i
t
,4
r. 55- Page - Hears -i Transcripts'
March 23, 19,98 -Board of Appeals
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Mrs. Moore, while your setting up for the next
hearing, we're.going to go to take a short break.
9:03 P.M. - Appl. No. 4547 - RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: This is a request,for a var.iance'based upon the
Building Inspector's January 2, 1998 Notice. of Disapproval which
reads .as follows:."...1) the proposed structure being ,located in an
LIO District is permitted to..have a. maximum of 60 feet.of-frontage on
one street. The proposed building is approximately 115 ft. facing
Rt -25. Pursuant to Article XIII, Section 100-13.3C; (2) When fences
are located in or along side and rear yards, they shall not exceed
671/2 feet in height, pursuant to 100-231B..." Location of Property:
74610 and 74500 Main Road,- Greenport, N.Y.;- 1000-46--1-1 and 2.1
combined as a single lot. We have a variety of site plans. Site plan
drawing S1 is the one that I like, the best. The most recent date on
that is October 21, 1997, indicating the approximate size of this
building at 5,000 sq.. ft..plus
MEMBER COLLINS:, 50,000 Mr. Chairman.
CHAIRMAN, GOE14RINGER: Pardon- me, 50,000, plus, thank you for
correcting me. I was only off by 45,000 and indicating the site plan
of the parking. area in the front and I,have a copy of the Suffolk
County Tax Map_ indicating this and surrounding properties in the
area, Good evening Mrs. Moore:, -again.
MRS. MOORE: Good evening. What I'd like to do is for the record,
describe; again, I know all of you've been there, but for the record,
describe what's presently existing on the site. Before I start, I
apologize, I have, I want to introduce everyone who's here, certainly
from Riverhead Building :Supply, Russell Goodale, Edgar Goodale, Jeff
Bauer, who is the- Manager.,. Allen Smith,, Co -counsel, Don Denis,
Architect, and I'm, aware that there are many other. individuals here,
certainly contractors who, are observing tonight and J believe in many
cases- in favor,,of this application. I'll let them speak for
themselves if they. wish to. To. begin with, the existing conditions
of the site, Riverhead Building., Supply presently. occupies 2.2 acres
of the westerly parcel. It's a, the parcels are'shown on a site plan
prepared by Don Denis -and it ,would be identified as Lot number 1.
The parcel ,has a..road frontage of 20.0 feet and extends 600 feet in
depth going to the Long Island Railroad. Riverhead Building Supply
contain, consists right now. of retail building. in the front, 2
warehouse -buildings, as well as, outside storage, in, the. rear. The
existing buildings are presently setback approximately 27 feet from
the main road. The easterly structure. is. 72 feet wide and one foot
oft the easterly property line and the, westerly structure is 45 feet
wide and setoff 5 feet off the westerly property 'line. Both
structures as I. -submitted to you ,in my application, together are
combined 117 feet. We are proposing -115 feet. In addition, the
structures are only about 30 feet apart which because of the size of
the parcel leaving very_ little. room for- screening and parking. With
that in mind certainly they're a. wonderful -client. to have because the
56- Page - Hear�lLg Transcripts
March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals
first thing that they said to me when we met, was, well what kind of
variances do :we need sand I described it and they. said well maybe we
should look into acquiring the adjacent parcel and sure enough
through their own efforts they acquired a 3.7 acre parcel. That
parcel went through a change of zone application to LIO, the Town
Board,:the SEQUA review and without exception, except one extension
of course, rezoned the parcel to LIO. Both -the Town Board during the
rezoning and the Planning Board determined that the proposed
development which they had before, and has not significantly changed
since its inception, will -be a significant improvement to the
existing conditions of the site. What brings us here aside from the
security fence, is a 60 foot local law which was adopted in 1995. I
went and I researched that local law to find out how it was created
and I found from the legislative history, someone, certainly I will
quote directly from the record, Supervisor Wickham at the time, he
stated that he opened the hearing and he stated, he said, I might
very briefly preface these comments by saying that, this legislation
is pursued to a policy resolution. That the Board adopted over a
year ago the pledged to keep open the character of .Route 48, this is
the Main Road, they throw in, he throws in as a ( ) ,other major
roads• in the town to avoid strip development appearance and to keep
the visual distance that are currently available for people driving
through. Again he states, also, to keep Route 48 -as an expressed
road without a lot of traffic congestion. The Board I know hasn't
changed, deviated from that intent with regard to Route -48.. However,
this is the'Main Road and entrance to the corridor into Greenport and
this area really. particularly since it went through as rezoning
process, the Town Board. determined that this was an appropriate use
at this site and LIO is the appropriate location for a- lumber yard
and this type of development. Certainly, it will be a great shot in
the arm. to -the development of this 'area. Sunrise Coach has done a
very lovely building across the way. But, aside from -Sunrise Coach,
and this building, there hasn't been much development in the last ten
some years. Certainly Janie Mills I think is the lash major change
in that., Mr. Dinizio, you're more .familiar with this area than I
am' But, I think history, this will be a significant investment in
the town. I want to submit -for the record, the legislative history
the local law and I highlighted the sections --that or the language
that, I quoted to you." 183 or 183 in this particular, when it was
adopted, it's another section now, deals with structures that are
setback at least 100 feet from a right-of-way. 'This property right
off the bat was setback at 100 feet from the .main road.. Section B
talks about -that there's an exception to Section A, which means that,
which says, that if adjacent parcels are developed you look at the
average setback of, the two parcels and then you can establish a
closer setback. What'I did is, I also went back to a, I took a long
at the site plans that were on record, as well as some measurements
that we could determine from an old aerial and it appears that well
certainly the existing setbacks for Riverhead Building Supply is 27,
Sunrise" -:Coach,, which is across the street, excuse me, Sunrise Coach
adjacent parcel is at 42 plus or minus, 711 Southland Corp., is at
approximately 35 feet." So, when you talk about an average setback of
42 and 35; 100 feet is a significant setback that we voluntarily put
this_ building and designed significant landscape offer, certainly
57 -.Page - Hear:_, Transcripts
March 23., 1998 -Board of Appeals,-
more
ppeals,
more than 711. I think if you calculate -10 feet of 711 buffer it's a
lot,•, and Sunrise Coach has none. It's all- blacktop. So this is
again, significant .improvement and the setback is in accordance with
the code, if not greater setback than would be required reading the
legislation and taking an average of the two., Across the road you
have Phil's -Bar which is maybe 20 foot setback. .New York Telephone
approximately 44 foot setback and Sunrise Coach the new building is
shown at :50 foot, setback. I have for the Board in addition to the
legislative history, I took the site plan of 711 and highlighted the
setback that is applicable so that you can again refer to that when
your deliberating. I submit to the Board that'this legislation is 60
foot wide' rule- doesn't, make. any sense., When you look at- the
legislative intent and where they were trying to address strict
development,; it just, it -doesn't make any 'sense and it's just
inconsistent with to start with`�the 3 acre lot. size and the. .:200 lot
width requirement in the Bulk Schedule. It does not address ,a
situation where you .have. added square footage. We,'ve.-now increased
the parcel by another 3 plus acres, so you have a 5.7 acre parcel and
you're still. using this crazy 60 foot rule. It's,, a prior
administration so I can beat up on it. This was really a very poor
attempt to address the design of strict. development and certainly
overreaching- for a single use business such as Riverhead Building
Supply. The Zoning'Board requested input from the Planning Board and
they certainly the first time around recommended this application as
it's been submitted.: We are before the Planning Board for site plan
review. It will be -referred to architectural review, but we can't
proceed any further until we've got a variance on ,.the .,lot width.
That makes sense. Because -this building is over 'the 60 foot rule,
again, 'Riverhead Building ,Supply went back to 100 feet. They have a
landscape offer of 25 feet. When you compare this project to every
other or every project within the 500., feet of this site, they far
exceed any requirement that's in the code and that's the preface just
to start with. my -arguments. With regard to variance criteria.
Obviously I have to give that to you but, and I'll' go through,. that
there's' no undesirable change produced in the character of the
neighborhood or, detriment to, nearby properties if, the variance is
granted. Again, this .parcel is over 5. acres. 'The Planning Board
when they, excuse me, no, the.-Town'.Board when it adopted this change
of,. -zone had some language or, their environmental consultants stated
and they placed on the record that the proposed change of zone is to
prevent better use and the design of the existing Riverhead Building
Supply site, the company proposed the state of the art operation that
will be include a pickup and pay drive through lumber building. The
HD designation to prior zoning did not make sense. It's.less than
ideal for residential housing as it -is-located behind 711 store and
next to the tracks and the LIO. This project didn't make sense as
hamlet, Hamlet Density and the Town Board in adopting the change of
zone 'determined that (change ,tape). -this structure will be in
conformity. with New York State Fire Prevention Building Codes,
-.Handicap Accessibility Laws.. I know. that I submitted a letter.to the
Board with regard to certain questions that you had and you have 'that
in. your .file with regard., to state mandates as well as sprinklers,
that's in .your file. Again this, will be .a significant investment in
the Town of Southold and as far as impact. on the character of the
58- Page - Hear-L,Lj Transcripts
March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals
neighborhood, it'll be an improvement to the character of the
neighborhood here, LIO. I'm sure you have questions on the
operations of the building. Jeff Bauer whose the manager can
describe for you how this, do you want to. describe what goes on
inside the building? And what I want you :to "get from this
presentation, very important, that this operation that the width
''that's being proposed- is necessary for the operations. I think you
know from the application process, what's being proposed and, certainly
the site plan and the internal diagram, but the width is based on the
drive-t,hrough concept. You want to describe what's"going"to go ori?
MR. BAUER: I don't know if.you want to follow with the plan.
MRS. MOORE: The plan that I have, in front of _me is the site plan
that is last dated October 21, 1997.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Right, the one I read.
MRS. MOORE: Yes,.S-1.
MR. BAUER: OK, first the customer would enter through the entrance
and we'd like them to stop in the retail part of the building,
purchase their material and then drive to the east side of the
building, enter and drive, proceed in the building and pick up
whatever they purchased in a dry, not ice condition; and then exit
the building on the west side, get checked out and exit. That's
basically operations.
MRS. MOORE:' So what you're talking'about here is a building with a
width of two 'aisle width to allow for two vehicles as well as truck
traffic because a lot of the vehicles that are going to be used are
Riverhead Building Supply vehicles that are loaded there and.sent out
to the job sites for delivery. Is that correct?
MR. BAUER: Correct.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Let me just ask a question. When the trucks
are loaded are the trucks out of the building, -when it is open for
retail picking up and dropping off?Or, are you still loading
trucks? If I was to go to Riverhead now, and see the building which
is basically a smaller scale of the tremendously, large building you
have in Riverhead. That's -not a sarcastic statement but is a
pragmatic -by the way.
MRS. MOORE: No; no, in fact, for"the record I` want you to know that
this building is comparing a golf ball to a basket ball.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: I understand.
MRS. MOORE: OK, you understand the dimensional?
CHAIRMAN-GOEHRINGER: Is there a restriction on the .amount of cars
that go:into this building,' -dr, you know, the'ingress and egress that
exists in the in and out? If- you had say 12 cars in the building,
• 59- Page - Hear-.., Transcripts
March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals
you know, picking up deliveries at certain assorted points, would
that be the max that would be in the building, or what's happening in
Riverhead in that respect?
MR. BAUER: Well, they'd be parking on the side of the aisles for
people picking up, so there will always be egress through the center
aisle for a vehicle exiting.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Alright. This building is 50,900 sq. ft. The
one in Riverhead is -what, 200,000?
MRS. MOORE: Riverhead is actually 123,000.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Riverhead is 123,000.
BOARD SECRETARY KOWALSKI: You were asking about outside lines. Your
first question was about outside lines.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: No, what I'm saying is, there is no outside
line use. You're stacking cars outside? How many cars are you
allowing in the building? .Have you determined that at all?
MR. BAUER: No we haven't. It all depends on ( ) business.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: But, the question I had, was, are you loading
and off loading Riverhead Building Supply vehicles at:the same time
that, apart from forklifts going in? I'm talking about plated
registered vehicles, OK, the trucks that you use that we see all over
on the Expressway, you know, all over, Southold Town, Riverhead
Town. Again, not a sarcastic statement, a statement of pragmatic
significance. Are you loading those and off loading those at the
time that retail cars are in there working?
MR. BAUER: They will be loading outside the building.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: They will be loaded outside the building. So
you'll be going in and out with forklifts with the material off
loading those, I mean loading and unloading those trucks outside.
MRS. MOORE: I'm not sure if that's a completely accurate statement.
No offense, but I think that, well obviously depending on the degree
of traffic. I think that's basic. But the facility can accommodate
loading their own vehicles internally as well as loading customers
vehicles, which are mostly the contractor's bringing their trucks.
So, you know, we can accommodate them.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: This was just happen to be at .a point that I
wanted to ask that question and I don't mean to convolute the
question. It's only a question that I had, that I was concerned
about. I've been in the Riverhead building, I had not seen loading
and of both, you know, individual customers' vehicles, alright, be
them trucks or cars or whatever the case might be or wheeldrives,
whatever the case might be and I'm not seeing that, so I would hope
that you would allow us to go up there and look at that.
60- Page - Hear -.ay Transcripts
March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals
MRS. MOORE: You're welcome at anytime, sure. In fact, come into the
t office and let yourself be known'and you'll get the tour.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRI14GER: Alright, good. Go ahead, I'm sorry, I didn't
mean to stop you'.'
MRS. MOORE: No, that's alright. I think that. -the point that I want
to stress is that, the width of the aisle, both ingress and egress,
because you are talking about a flow here, the width of the
materials, correct, and the center as well as -on the sides.
MR. BAUER: Yes. `
MRS. MOORE: That,the vehicles, two vehicles have to -be able to pass
through.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Well that's the purpose of the 115 feet, is
what you're telling.
MRS. MOORE:-Exactly, exactly. So when we're talking about the need
for something greater than 60 feet, again, the use of this building
and the Town Board identified it through their secret process it is
unique. The Planning Board in their recommendation said, this is a
unique concept. That it's essentially covering storage. The storage
that is now outside in.the yard and the materials that can be
affected by the elements are • now going to be neatly stored, drive in
the elements and while you always had Class A number 1 materials, now
they'll be even better': So,-true,.it's true.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER:.. Lydia has -a question, Pat.
MEMBER TORTORA: The flow -of :traffic on both of the west access and
egress and the east access is two way, correct?
MRS. MOORE: Yes. The state route -entrances?
MEMBER COLLINS: From the highway.
MRS. MOORE: From the high, from main road, OK.
MEMBER TORTORA: And yet, that's what I'm trying to figure out.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: No, it's one way.
MR. BAUER: The arrows are pointing one way.
(Everyone making various comments.)
MEMBER TORTORA: The access to Route 25, in both access areas. On
both sides of the building.
MRS. MOORE:--Correct.
MEMBER TORTORA: It's two way traffic.
61- Page - Hear_'_.y Transcripts <
March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals -
MRS. MOORE: You read that correctly.'
MEMBER TORTORA: Good.. Now, my question -is this. If someone is
coming in from the east side,- and, they want to come through the
building to go, because there.is only one in and out _
MRS. MOORE: Yes, you have a one. way.
Y -
MEMBER TORTORA: Method. So, I'm just trying to figure out, how
would they get.to into the,building from the east side?
MRS. MOORE: The site, plan is as a law, is the flow of traffic,
you're not talking about narrow corners here. of the, for site
purposes?
MEMBER TORTORA: No.
MRS. MOORE: You have certainly. wide .enough aisles., that if you have
somebody coming from the west, that has to come in through the
entrance on the east,, they will go by the, retail center, presumably
stop at the retail, pick-up whatever it,is -that they need from the
retail department,or go directly into the lumber storage,, coverage
storage area, and come in. These.° are site plan issues that' the
Planning didn't seem•to have a problem and this is -
MEMBER TORTORA: I was just curious because I was looking at the way
the traffic was - flowing and trying to figure out. It•'s very clear
how you go through the building, but,, there's only one 'entrance to
the building. That's from the east side of the building and if
you're accessing it from the west side, I was trying to figure out
hoW •'you , would do that .
MRS. MOORE: Well, I think the site plan pretty much identifies where
the traffic will or, might go. I think Allen can address, your need
to the traffic flow as experienced in the .vehicular trips that are
anticipated. But, this is, not a.heavily,.used-site, certainly they're
going to hope that -they'll get increased use, but, -
MEMBER TORTORA: The other question I had was, that I noticed it on
the site plan it says, that the required number ,of spaces is 91
spaces and you're providing 48 and -
MRS. MOORE: Yes. What you're, the way the parking is calculated,
they're using the' covered storage; which 1. if you. didn't cover the
storage area, this whole area .is storage, there ,would,be no parking
calculations for. storage. It's not a, there's no generation of
parking for storage. What they have is a calculation of what they
anticipate are the needs of the retail. So really the parking is for
the most part addressing the ''retail use, with certainly some parking
that's needed for the wholesale end of it. The, I don't want to say
wholesale, -the lumber storage, the loading area. If the Planning
Department deems that it's necessary to have more parking, they have
certainly a great deal of land that., they can- land bank and have
P.
62- Page - Hear�..y' Transcripts
March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals
additional parking, but, they're familiar .with the degree of use of
their facility and certainly the parking, this parking .is extremely
important to Riverhead Building Supply because ,it is the retail
parking_. It's where you and I would .go in to buy our nuts and
bolts. 'I wouldn't go; through that facility most, likely with my
Minivan. It's kind of sexist, but I think I'd send my -husband to do
that. I would go into the retail center. and pick out whatever: I
needed. I can say that because I'm female..
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Mrs. Moore, Ms. Collins has a question of Mr.
Bauer. You have a question of Mr. Bauer?
MEMBER COLLINS: I would like to ask a question while Mr. Bauer is
standing there and where -on this topic, because I guess, I guess the
questions that largely occur .to me are echoed here about sought of
physically, how it'll work, how will the traffic move, because that
has implications for how it'll appease the neighbor and so forth?
When you first started to describe it Mr. Bauer, you said, well now
the customers will come in from the highway and I think you said, and
they would park and go to the retail operation. and ,then proceed to
the warehouse for.pickup. Now, obviously sought -of broadly speaking,
two different kinds of customers. There's me, whenI want something,
that would probably,have'to come from the warehouse, but, isn't very
big-and.it'll.fit in the back of my station wagon. And, then there's
the contractor, who doesn't get your .truck to his site who comes with
his own truck. Is that broadly speaking the two kinds of customers
that there are?
MR. BAUER & MRS. MOORE: Right.
MEMBER COLLINS: Obviously, if I - .show up, I'm going to park out near
retail and go get somebody to hold my hand while.I,figure out what it
is I really need. Will all of the professional customers also park
and go talk to someone sought of in the front of the operation before
they go and -pick up?
MRS. MOORE: Before you answer that. Only because you don't
operate. How it's operated in - Riverhead might be. more helpful,
because obviously in all fairness to Jeff, I'm kind of putting.him on
the spot. This will develop in the ( ) system will be ironed
out throughout the system, but I think -
MEMBER COLLINS: I understand that, I just like.a concept here.
MRS. MOORE: No, that alright. I mean
concept. but, I think that if you want
Riverhead, I. think that that's gotten
tear without the. -
MR. BAUER:' A month and a half.
MRS. MOORE: A month, and a half, OK.
little bit.
if you feel comfortable 4with a
to hear how it's handled in
at least :•a month's wear and
Who would like to describe a
63- Page - Hear -:may Transcripts
March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals
MR. EDGAR GOODALE: What do we want to know.?
BOARD SECRETARY KOWALSKI: I need to know'his name again, please.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER.: That's Edgar Goodale. Edgar could you just
explain in a very mild brief sense, how the person must go to the
retail portion of the building to get the yellow slip for the
articles they must pick up in the back? You know, I mean, very
rarely is anyone ever going to go right .directly into the storage
.warehouse without having their pickup slip;. -right?
MR. EDGAR GOODALE: Quite the contrary.that's not particularly true.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: That's not particularly true. 'OK,', would you
clear that up then for us? Lora listen to this.
MRS. MOORE: Two.examples. One is a contractor and one is I'm coming
in to buy a -
MR. EDGAR GOODALE: Pat Moore comes, in and she'll come in to the
front, she'll come into,the front retail area, and she'll come and
talk to somebody and we'll give her a, she'll pick out what ever- she
r. wants in the store, and then, -by chance, she.may want a,•she was told
to pick up one 'piece of molding. So she wants ':to go through to get
that. We will give her'a ticket, she will then drive around the
building, go through on the east side _of the building, stop where the
molding is, get it, go out. The other part is, is when a contractor
or "whomever comes in *and is familiar with the operation, knows what
he wants; knows that it's -not in the store, he just wants to go pick
up that piece .of molding. He can go directly into the.building, get
that, get billed out on the way out.and be on his way and never enter
the retail store.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: So there's no reason to go, into the retail
store then.
MR'. EDGAR GOODALE: Exactly.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER:'.- And that's the way it's working in 'Riverhead
right now?
MR. EDGAR GOODALE: Right and so far it's only a month and a half old
for any of ( - ) , between 40 - 50% of the...people do not go into the
retail store.
MEMBER COLLINS: Right.- Thank.•you. That is precisely the question I
was'asking, and the reason why I,was asking"it, is because parking is
certainly a relevant question in these things and the footnote on the
site .plan states with respect,to the number of parking places that
they translated it says, there are fewer than might be required on a
scheduled basis, partly -because some of- our customers are never going
to park: That, that,'s howl it .translate and I wanted to hear that
from you. That some of your customers are never.going to.park. They
are going to arrive, drive through and go away?
64- Page - Hears—, Transcripts
March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals
MR. EDGAR GOODALE: Correct..
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: So the same access that you have in the retail
store for the aspect of charging this to a particular customer, or, a
cash sale, can exist at what you referred -to as the checkout booth.
MR. EDGAR GOODALE: Correct.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER': Alright. So they can either pay cash or have
their account credited and so on and so forth. Alright, that's good.
MRS. MOORE: So I think I've addressed the element of that the
benefits sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method
feasible by the applicant to pursue. Again, you now are familiar
with the operation of the building and how the drive through, the
loading all works in trendily within this building. Again, that's
why the width is what it is: Whether or not the area variance is
substantial,' is a question that certainly you will consider. But, we
have to balance the, use the balancing test that weighs in favor of
the grant of this variance. If in particular, I mean this is why I
get so frustrated with the 60 foot rule, because to start with, if
you ask Planning, where did you come up with 60 feet? And, they will
unabashedly admit, well we just kind of pulled it out from the air.
You know; it really makes, it's not a related to any particular
thought process. They really just use 60 feet and I think on a three
acre parcel or a what the Zoning Code requires, marginally makes some
sense. I won't even say .it makes sense, but, marginally there's some
justification. On a five acre parcel it makes absolutely no sense.
If we were to take out the 60 foot rule, there would be the setbacks
that would be required and we could have, I mean maybe there's a
reason to have the width requirement, because we could have as much
as 265 feet in width. That would not, certainly not be the case
here. But, if you, if you look at LIO and the users, and the
industrial users, that are considered there. If you were in the
business of designing luxury yachts, for some reason, and your
clientele buys steamship liners, I mean this is the kind of ship that
they would design. LIO is where you would -send them. The zoning is
the appropriate zoning. And, the building has to make sense, and the
width -of the building has to 'make sense in .light of the use. So, the
60 foot rule I think eventually may be reconsidered and I think in a
certain way they were trying to draft something that mitigated the 60
foot rule because it talked about, again, if you were dealing with
stripped development you would have Paragraph C that talked about,
separate structures and that no single structures have to have more
than"60 feet, ( ) that if you were setback with multiple structures
..you go back to 75 feet. So, -there was some thought. -.process about,
OK, you're goingto stagger, if you had a strip development, which is
I think what they were trying to address, not very well here, but,
that was •the attempt, you would push back to -75 feet or so. Again,
we're back.to 100 feet and 60 width doesn't make sense. The variance
will have no adverse affect or impact on the physical and
environmental conditions of the neighborhood .or district. That has
already been determined through the change of zone process and the
SEQUA process. The alleged difficulty was not self created.. If
65- Page - Hear -..,4 Transcripts
March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals
anything, they made,',tney,-were abundantly cautious by purchasing the
adjacent parcel, being. able -to develope. this parcel. with full
buffers, with full screening, .adequate parking. I mean really this
is, again; if I had all, my, clients -that were like this, V d have a
very easy time before this -Board. With regard to the fence height,
it -'s obvious that this is a security fence. There is an existing 6
foot high fence around the existing perimeter of Riverhead Building
Supply, and now with the .additional acreage, they'd like to continue
that around. • It's obvious that you need to have some security in,
the fence height wouldn't be adequate. The code would not be
adequate. The various request is minimal variance practical given
the personal benefits, anticipated by the applicant. ,This is a state
of the art complex. The only other complex of this nature -Is the one
in -.Riverhead and I think it's been .described to you how it works... I
do, have just the front end of the Riverhead Building Supply site
because when we asked the architect, I think it was, we asked the
architect to give us the same scale so you would- know, you know,
applying the same scale to :our plan as a Riverhead Building Supply
site. We could get the entire building within- just a part of
Riverhead Building Supply in Riverhead. Again, the site,. Riverhead
site is so much .larger than this piece and if any questions come up
with regard to comparing the two, you have .a significantly smaller
site here which is certainly in proportion with the development of
this area and they think with the needs of.this area. I believe that
the Planning -Department actually identified it accurately that. most
of the clientele that's here, hopefully they will increase the uses,
but, it's mostly for this area.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: So what you're saying; is the front of the
building in Riverhead is going to be similar to the front of the
building?'
MRS. MOORE: No, no.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: No, what are you saying?
MRS. MOORE: I- wasn't very ( ), I apologize. What we did is,
because there might have been some questions on what (someone
coughing) comparing Riverhead, I think that maybe one of the
neighbors came in to review the file and sent a letter concerned
about this development and identifying it with the Riverhead
development, particularly the brochure that was -sent out through the
mail. I know•.I got it. I know it's important'to your record. (Yes,
you got it). That shows - the beautiful. rendering of the Riverhead
site and the use of the Riverhead site. .It's going to be just as
nice,. but in a much smaller scale and what we did was just compare
the two. We asked the architect to give'us the same dimensions, the
same scale. OK, the one inch equals 20.- The plans that you have in
front of you. When you take -one inch equals. 20, of the Riverhead
site, you can fit the entire building in just the showroom area of
Riverhead.` So what I wanted you. to do, is to have a comparison of
the two that you really can't compare the two.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Alright.
66- Page - Hear -..y Transcripts
March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals
MRS. MOORE: So you overlap it and you can see that there's a, the
Southold, the Greenport site, that's Riverhead, this is, Riverhead.
Again to give you, you all notice the area, but, to give you a flavor
of the existing conditions. There's a pad here. that has the
photographs 'of the site, existing conditions, and where 711 is in
relation to the property. So, I'll give that to you. Also submit to
the Board, the 711 site plan from the Planning Department's records
and the legislative history, .which I quoted to you earlier. I'd be
happy to answer any. questions and I have Don Denis here, who, trekked
all the way out here.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Are you going to allow us to grill anyone from
Riverhead?
MRS. MOORE: Whoever you'd like.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: No, no, Edgar? The basic question I have, is
really, what brought. the concept of putting everything inside? What
caused you to get to that? -I mean and I want to ._preface it by
saying, that I know that .since 1985 or thereabouts, the lumber yard
in Riverhead had some, a.surprising amount,of their lumber inside and
that was 84 lumber, OK. In a much less, you know, a much less stated
manner, alright. The doors, there were never any doors on the
building. You know, actually it was colder in. that building than it
was on the outside most of the time. Not .that I ever frequent it
much, but, when I did, it was usually a Sunday afternoon and I
couldn't get lumber some place else. But, what caused you to come to
that point? Anybody? I mean certainly Mr. Goodale, we know that,
you know, that a variety of your lumber has to remain inside.
There's no doubt about it. But,. .you know, the green lumber, and
everything. What is the purpose of putting everything inside?
MR. EDGAR: Besides the obvious of keeping the material even better
and out of the ice and rain and snow and shovelling off piles ( ).
It's been proven that it's a convenient factor and comfort factor for
customers who much rather choose and pick what they want out of the
piles as they see fit. The whole idea was actually, I'd like to take
credit for it, but, I really can't. ( ) designer who grew up in
Maine who was designed, he designed one or two of these throughout
the country, and he's the one who actually came and actually sold us
on the idea of, well we were going to move anyway. We had designed
to put it all in separate buildings, the old fashion way and he kind
of talked -us into it, he said, there's a better way of doing it and
create a better flow for your. customers. So that's where the idea
actually came from. He sold us on that.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER:. In the one month that you've been going on, you
know, or month and a half,.the-lumber that has uniquely been outside,
what have you seen, have there been any effects of the -
MR. GOODALE: Absolutely, much less deterioration of the material and
the biggest benefit of that would be during the summertime when you
start to get the rain and then the sun beating down on it. That's
the worst damage there is to material and the wintertime not as much,
67- Page - Heari,,_Kj Transcripts
March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals
or be it, you don't have. to shovel snow off of it, but there is much
less. We're discovering much less damage, much less waste doing it
in this particular fashion.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Alright. And, the other thing is, do your
insurance carriers .require you to -put the more toxic lumber in one
specific spot, -or, anything of that nature? Are they asking you to
isolate that for a particular reason?
MR. GOODALE: No.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: No, so that CCA is all put in a, in the same
general area along -with all the other - `
MR. GOODALE:. Yes, because basically CCA is not toxic substance.
That a
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: No, I didn't mean, I -meant when it burns. Well
to some degree.,.. Whatever they put in it now. They usually put
arsonic in it, and they're not doing it anymore, whatever they're
doing. I'm sure plastic is more toxic than that is, if it was to burn.
MR. GOODALE: No, they have no restrictions on what materials.should
go where., We don't have flammable,' you know, combustible type of
materials.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Right. Lydia you have a question?
MEMBER TORTORA: Yes.. I see on your -buffer zones, you're proposing a
4 foot.buffer zone in the side and the rear?
MR. GOODALE: 4 foot?
MEMBER TORTORA: That's what it says on the site:
MRS. MOORE: No 30, 30 foot?
MEMBER TORTORA: That's to the residential zone. It says perimeters
of landscape buffer front yard 25, side and rear 4 feet.
MRS. MOORE: Yes, that's the bus yard. Commercial.
MEMBER TORTORA: Yes and what would be like on the east side? What
would be within that 37 feet to the parking area? You see what I'm
saying? All the little cccs are.
MRS. MOORE: There are a lot of cedar trees on site.
MEMBER. TORTORA: In other words, there's 4 feet of buffering proposed
and I'm not sure what's in the area on the western and the eastern to
the parking area.
MRS. MOORE: I'm sorry, I couldn't hear you. Which side are you
talking about?
68- Page - Hearing Transcripts
March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals
MEMBER TORTORA: On the west and on, the east. On the west side,
there's 37 feet, it's either 37 feet to where the parking lot is.
MRS. MOORE: Yes, I see, cccs.
MEMBER TORTORA: I'm tried to figure out what's in there. Is that
concrete? Is it crushed stone? Is it landscaping? What is it?
MRS. MOORE: No, no.
MR. GOODALE: That's green.
MRS. MOORE: That's green.- You start the curb and the blacktopping.
That's the asphalt paving. The 37 feet is actually grass and growth.
MR. GOODALE: That's, that new lawn area right before,that. It's all
new lawn in that area.
MRS. MOORE: Yes, right. So, you're actually going -to have 37 feet
even on the commercial side.
MR. GOODALE: New lawn on the east side also.
MEMBER VORTORA: Yes, that's why I was a little confused because it
said 4 feet of buffer, see Pat? Under landscaping.
MEMBER COLLINS: Oh, you mean in the notes to'the drawing.
MRS. MOORE: Oh, in the notes. -Landscape buffer perimeter side and
rear 4 feet. Any reason?
Mit. GOODALE: I don't know the explanation.
MRS. MOORE: Well I mean, we can answer it later. It looks like a -
MEMBER TORTORA: It looks like 37 feet.
MRS. MOORE: Yes.
MEMBER TORTORA: But the note say, 4 feet.
MRS. MOORE: I think -
MR. GOODALE: It's clear 4 foot.
MRS.-MOORE: No, no, I see what it is. Landscape buffer, these are I
think the code requirements. ' Front yard 25, perimeter side rear 4
and buffer for residential zone 30. That's what the code requires if
I'm remembering it correctly.- What we're actually providing is
what's on the site plan. OK?
MEMBER TORTORA: Yes.
69- Page - Hear -L,.,4 Transcripts
March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: .,We thank you again Mr. Goodale. Alright, we'll
start with Mr. Dinizio, questions?
MEMBER DINIZIO: Yes, I have a few. Since you -started -in Riverhead,
have you seen an_increase in business? You know over a month?
MR. GOODALE: Yes.
MEMBER DINIZIO: I mean it's better, it's not the same, right. So, I
guess Jeff will probably answer this question better. On your
busiest day, I mean, I see you have what, 12 parking spaces now, if
that. You got three where everybody wants to, go, and then you have
on the other side, where you could park. So, say -you had 12 spaces,
can you recall anytime when they've ever been full?
MR. BAUER: Oh, yeah.
MEMBER DINIZIO: And then, where do they park?
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Jeff, can you come up and use the mike?
MRS. MOORE: Mr. Smith can'provide some of the details.
MR..SMITH: In anticipation of -the' issue. I. had the ticket sales,
trip tickets analyzed for the Greenport yard and on an average, it is
about 102,trips per day for each business day and that ranges in the
winter season, 70 trips in to a high 125.
MRS. MOORE: Does that answer your question?
MEMBER DINIZIO: Not really, no: I mean I understand you do a lot of
business. But, are those people coming into the counter, or, are
those people, you Know are you selling from the trucks? You know,
what is that -
MRS. MOORE: Counter, counter.
MR. SMITH: That's counter.
MRS. MOORE: Counter, yes, that's counter sales, yes.
MEMBER DINIZIO: That's counter., So', lets say you have 100 cars
going in and out that same day. That'd be a fair statement?
MR. SMITH: Correct.
MEMBER DINIZIO: Is that pretty much spread out during the course of
the day, or, is it,a busy time of day?
MR. SMITH: There's busy times of the day, Jim. There's between 7
and 9 in the morning and then you get .another load in the afternoon
about between 1 and 2.
70- Page - Hear. _ Transcripts
March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals
MEMBER D,INIZIO: So, say about 50% of your business is within' that
and the rest of it's people coming and going' -as a, -
MR. SMITH: Yes.
MEMBER DINIZIO: Well lets say 100 cars during the course of the day.
You have 14 spaces. I can't recall anybody ever stacking up there,
having to park in Browns, or, you know, just with the minimal amount
of parking you have.now. I mean if your saying to us, that,you're not
going to have an increase in business, or, even if it's a 50% more,
I'm thinking your parking is going to be more, much more than
adequate when you, have this new building. I mean is that a fair
statement?
MRS. MOORE: That's presently proposed.
MEMBER DINIZIO: Right. That's a pretty fair statement?
MRS. MOORE.: Yes.
MEMBER DINIZIO: And that you're going to be, not only .are you
encouraging people to come in, but, more times than not, the people
that would have to come in now, would ask you for the wood, and then
go .back to_ their, truck and. - then go back to the.yard and get it.
They're not going to do that any longer. They're going to right into
-the building, get what ,they want and leave. So, they're not even
going to get any part of that?
MRS. MOORE: Right.
MEMBER DINIZIO: But; 100 tickets that Mr. Smith had just stated, is
that fair, is that a fair statement?
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: For the record, that was Allen Smith that spoke
prior to Jeff.
MEMBER DINIZIO: So we're looking at a reduction. I think we're
looking at a reduction in traffic, parking in this area. I mean, is
that fair?
MRS. MOORE: I think a better flow of parking than a reduction per
se., I mean, what's presently offered on, site is, at times
inadequate. You know, I know I've been there and it's been kind of
tight. This meets the code. In fact, you know again, they're
addressing most of the retail use to be sure that you know, I can go
in there with my kids in the Van and stuff and go in there
comfortably. People who are there -all the time will know how to
avoid going into the retail. So, when they designed these buildings
I think it's fair to say, that your experts really kind of advise you
and parking as well, is that true?
MR. SMITH: ( )
71- Page - HearL__4 Transcripts
March 23, 1998 -Board 'of Appeals
MRS. MOORE: So that this concept, 'and Mr. Goodale mentioned the
gentleman from Maine, that when they designed -this building, they
also think about the specific use. So, the 'parking, we hesitate to
reduce the parking in anyway particularly for the retail. We really
don't think it's necessary to increase the parking because you really
don't want to see a parking. And, in fact, when Planning reviewed
it, they really had no recommendation to increase the parking. Bob
Kassner had reviewed it, and .seemed to think, that -the parking was
adequate. You have to give some credence to the professionals that
know, the operation of the business and listen to them.' In fact, in
Riverhead, I think that the code requires:- one set of parking and you
actually. -increased it. Is that correct? For retail..
MR. SMITH: Correct, that's right.
MRS. MOORE:. So, when it came to retail, at least in Riverhead, they
said, well we know the code requires X but -we think that we'll need
more and provided more. Here, they're saying, well the code says, we
need, well because of the storage needs that large number 91 whatever
the. number was, and that's clearly too much parking. You'd end up
with a sea of parking when in fact it could be a green area.
MEMBER DINIZIO: Well, that's what I was trying to reinforce and also
you know, the fact that less cars will be parking and asking
questions and more cars will you know, be going through this building
and, as far..as I can tell, it's not, like it will be drawing new
customers. It's not as though people are going to come -that don't
already come.
MRS. MOORE: Yes_, that's been the experience.
MEMBER DINIZIO: Now, your employee parking is going to be in the
same area?
MRS. MOORE: No, the employee parking is 'actually on the side. ( )
this side.
MR.. SMITH: "On the side, yes. ;
MRS. MOORE: Right. 'On the easterly side is an area of 11 parking
spaces.
MEMBER DINIZIO: Are.you going to,increase the amount of employees as
it's taking more people to run the business is'more?
MR. RUSSELL GOODELL: Yes, hopefully.
MEMBER DINIZIO: 50%? I'.m,just looking for a -
MR. RUSSELL GOODELL: We have 15 now.
MRS: MOORE: I think that what was said, is that they have 15
employees .now. If all goes well, certainly they., will increase the
employment.. They will employ additional people. And as I stated
72- Page - Heari-rny, Transcripts
March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals
before, there is a significant amount of land here, that if they were
to need additional parking for employees, there's room for it. Could
it be land bank now? Yes, but it's really not necessary at this
stage.
MEMBER DINIZIO: Could you tell me what was it zoned before that?
MRS. MOORE: Hamlet HD.
MEMBER COLLINS: Hamlet Density Residential.
MRS. MOORE: Hamlet Density. It had actually approved site plan for
multi family in a condominium.
MEMBER DINIZIO: Then in the back is the railroad tracks?
MRS. MOORE: Correct.
MEMBER DINIZIO: That's all I have.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Ms. Collins?
MEMBER COLLINS: I'm not sure to whom the question goes, maybe the
architect.
MRS. MOORE. Oh, good, because the architect has importance.
MEMBER COLLINS: I just want to explore a little bit further the
rational and the basis for the 115 foot (train whistle,) (LIRR
lives),. the rational for the 115 foot width and I have not ( ) on
inside the Riverhead facility, but, like everyone else on the North
Fork, I got the brochure, and obviously this is a schematic drawing.
This is clearly not a drawing to scale in the Riverhead facility.
But, what it suggests is, that on each of .the lanes going through,
there really are three lanes. One is a traffic lane and adjacent to
it on each side, are lanes where the customer's truck is going to
stop while he does his dealing with the inventory. Talks to the
staff and loads up the materials. So, on the site, on the drawing of
the Greenport building, what you show is, one arrow going south from
the entrance and then another arrow coming north from down by the
railroad end of the building. And, I'm assuming that each of those
arrows really represents a three lane traffic lane. One for actually
moving the .vehicles, and the other two for loading from the shelves
and bunkers on each side. And, I guess where all of this is leading
me is, of the whole 115 foot width, how much of that width is for
moving the customers' vehicles through the building, and giving the
customers' vehicles a space where they can stop and load up, and how
much of that width is for,the lumber?
MR. DENIS: My name is Don Denis, Architect. Let me explain that the
width of the building was arrived at by the consultant that Mr.
Goodale talked about. I can give you these dimensions but as I
understand it, the aisles are wide enough to have vehicles parked
left and right and a vehicle to pass in the middle.
73- Page - Hear, Transcripts
March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals
MEMBER COLLINS: That's what I thought, yes was described, right.
MR. DENIS: I think you're right about that. And.then the' storage,
there's storage on the outside planks of the building and also down
through the center. So, he's arrived at these dimensions and I think
he's done it through. experience and the dimensions of the driving
aisle down the center is 30 feet from both cases and then the bin
storage seems to be about 28 feet on either side. .The storage in the
center of approximately ten feet.,
MEMBER COLLINS: I think we already passed 115.
Mrs. Moore and Mr. Denis adding up footage.
MEMBER COLLINS:. 30 and 30 is 60 and.2 x 28 is 56 -and, that's 116.
MR.,DENIS: Well, you're getting me on a foot?
MEMBER COLLINS: Oh, no, I'm sorry. Understand, that this is
definitely not a, I'm not trying to pin anything on anybody. I
really just am trying to get a grasp of why the building is 115 feet?
MR. DENIS: Yeah, that's, that's -how it was arrived at. I mean, I
don't have a working knowledge of a lumber yard storage business.
But, I do'know, that we did consult with him as a consultant and this
is the dimension we arrived at., I believe he actually wanted it
wider and he brought .the dimensions in and said, this is the least
that they could do and have the building work as they wanted it to
work and that's how we arrived at that. But, I do remember it was
wider and I 'can't tell you how much wider it was. Since this - is
Southold, we made it narrow. I do want to say one other thing while
I'm here about the entrances. That has been approved by the State
Transportation Department. So, that's been all. approved and so has
the sanitary system.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Thank you. George?
MEMBER HORNING:- My colleagues has asked the questions that I
question myself. But.again, you're telling us that there's a dual of
dance here. One for the. customer, one for the business with having
this drive through facility where all the materials are stored
inside? Is that correct? There's an advantage to the business and
to businesses' customers? -
MRS. MOORE: 'Oh, sure, yes. ,.You know between.,the preservation of the
materials as well as just customer services, that's -
MEMBER HORNING: And you could not provide this ,type of a situation
with a conventional building, 60 feet wide? Is that correct?
-MRS. MOORE:._.Correct, absolutely, that's right.
MEMBER HORNING: Thank you.
74- Page - Hearing Transcripts
March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Alright. Pat, unless you have more we're going
to ask anybody else that wants to speak. Ilm going to tell you that
we're going to knock off hearing at approximately 20 minutes:
MRS. MOORE: I do want to address one point that was made through
correspondence. I got a copy of it. A recommendation by the
Planning Department to increase the setback by 10 feet. Bob Kassner
is on vacation right now so I don't have an opportunity to discuss it
with him. But, as I mentioned at the beginning of this presentation,
100 feet is actually greater than what the code would allow. The
retail parking is very important for the retail for this use and I
mean if you look at the site plan for 711 which I submitted to you,
the parking layout of the front is very similar without the extra
vegetation. We are certainly increasing the amount of green space
and buffer. But, the layout is very similar. So, if you look at 711
which is a pure retail facility, you can see that this is a standard
layout for retail parking. I would ask the Board to consider solely
the 60 foot criteria and the fact that we are 100 feet and that we
have 711, at 40 something and Sunrise which is also at 42. So, on
average you have a 40_ foot setback on both sides: You keep pushing
this building back nobody is going to see it. That doesn't make any
sense either. But, the building has been located again, 100 feet to
recalculate` all the drainage and everything over a 10 foot setback,
it really doesn't make sense. And, to eliminate any .parking for the
retail, again, would be a significant impact on the retail operation
of this building. I would ask again, the Board to consider and
concentrate on the 60 foot which I think we've adequately addressed
the need for the 115 foot width of the building and the fact that
you've got a 5.7 acre parcel and.not deal with the site plan. Let us
address site plan issues with the Planning Department rather .than
with you.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Alright, at the culmination of this hearing,
just see if you have any objection to this. I want to close the oral
testimony again and just very simply close it as a matter of fact on
April 16. I just want to tour' the'Riverhead Building and if I have
any particular questions I'll raise them.
MRS. MOORE: You can ask and I'll be able to submit it to them, right?
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Yes, we'll raise it and you could respond in
writing and then we'll circulate to anybody, if we have to. Thank
you very much from the Goodale family, and so on and so forth, both
co -counsels and Jeff. Is there anybody else would like to speak in
favor of this project? Could you just state your name for the
record, Sir?
MR. DZENKOWSKI: My name is Kim Dzenkowski. I'm a licensed
contractor. You asked a bunch of questions here. You almost further
had me asking me what you're questions are. I deal with it from both
ends. I buy stuff for my own house, I buy for the customers. I'm
not like Chad Orlowski, I don't build new houses. I just do
repairs. Everything they've said here, is 100% accurate. You just
need to go, down there on a Saturday morning and try to find a place
75- Page - Hear:. -,4 Transcripts
March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals.-.
to park, or go.down there in the winter time when it hasn't snowed in
three weeks and you use a sledge hammer to get the lumber apart.
Summertime, -everything is stocked on top of those stacks, is just
twisted and bent. It's not only lost internal for them, it's pick
outs for me and it's more for my customers. I have very little
delivery, my work is mostly top end stuff, everything is hand
picked. This is just a huge asset down there. Traffic will be much
better, the facilities will be much better, and the - lumber will be
much better. As, far as extra, I mean they'd love to see that 40
parking lot built. They'd love it. It's never going to happen.
Therejust isn',.t- enough people -in Southold Town and nobody else is
.going to come in here and just to drive all, the way to Greenport to
buy it.
CHAIRMAN. GOEHRINGER: . Thank you. Anybody else. Would anybody like
to speak against the.project? Sir?
MR. MAZZONE: How do you do: My name is Jeff Mazzone. .What about
the increased traffic in that area? I mean has there been a traffic
studied?
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Do you want to reflect on that Pat? .
MRS. MOORE:.,A
MR. MAZZONE: Excuse me one second. But, usually I go camping at one
of the,camps down Moore's Lane. I mean there's a lot of traffic
there, hen going to the, ferry, 711 is right there, there's going to
be a lot more traffic. More bigger trucks. You're going to have
more truck, right?
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: I assume your asking us that question or are
you just posing the question?.
MR. MAZ'ZONE:.:,I,'m posing the question. I mean, thinking,out loud.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER:.'. Alright. Do you want to respond to it Allen?
MR. SMITH: For the record,, my name is Aleen Smith. I'm general
counsel .to Riverhead Building Supply, As I stated earlier I've had
the tickets, the' trip tickets sampled and I stated earlier to Mr.
DinizioIs question that the tickets. show an average of .approximately
10.2 trips. The environmental determinations. have been made earlier
in this process and if the gentleman were truly interested- in the
issue I would imagine he would of arrived at. that particular time and
asked the question. But,, that being .said and having put the actual
factual number'. of trips, in the record, I would point out that .the
.standard is established by the, it's called Standard 812 for Trip
Generations, additional- manual.- I have a letter for you on this and
it lis gaged in two particular letters for the 15, employees they have
at this particul-ar site and -I have the standard citation here for
you. You would see approximately 20.0 trips that is consistent with
the actual and if ,you use the floor area of the retail, which is the
76- Page - Hear:...., Transcripts
March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals.
other standard, you would show 150 trips and those are the two
standard that ( ) of record for this -type of work and certainly that
has been proposed to you is consistent with -those statements.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Alright.
MR. MAZZONE: Now he's talking, excuse me, he's talking about what
normally"occurs in Greenport,, at the lumber yard, right? -
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: I -'m assumi•rig that's what he's talking about. I
haven't had a chance to review it. What I'want to do is give you the
benefit of reviewing it, alright, and commenting on it. So, you're
.welcome to do that. This is the only copy we have. We're going to
-,copy it for you tomorrow, we'll give it to you and we.,'ll let you
respond to it.
MR. MAZZONE: I just wanted to see what .they did in Riverhead. I
mean, a new place, why would you build a new place if you think
you're going to have the same people come in? I mean, wouldn't you
upscale for more people?
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Well, that was the purpose of my question, why
put everything under cover? Basically the same -situation and I.
assume I'm not answering the question for you, but, I assume that
they are telling us that they have much less waste and people appear
to enjoy this option as Mr. Dzenkowski said.
MR. MAZZONE: Thank you.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Anybody else like to speak against?
MR. RUTKOWSKI: ANTHONY RUTKOWSKI. One thing I was thinking about.
How about liability? Someone goes in there. I go in and go to the
retail store and buy a couple. of saws or whatever and I 'go out and
get my lumber. Suppose I'm standing there and the forklift happens
to swirl with my foot, or you something falls. and'lets say I break my
-arm. Is there some kind of release or are there signs in the building
stating that you know, the customer is at his own risk? Is that ever
going to be mentioned?
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: I haven't had a chance to tour. the Riverhead
facility to -see that. But, will have -
MR. MAZZONE: I'believe that in the zoning, the 60 foot rule, I think
they also mention that was suppose to be related to traffic flow and
the amount of traffic going in and -out. of these so-called future
strip malls. So maybe 'they had that traffic study was related to
that'. And also, one other point was, since they're going to have
this facility, which they say.is like a golf ball to a basket ball, I
think she meant, that 711 is the golf ball and this is the basket.
ball.
- 77- Page - Hear,.ig Transcripts
March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals
MR. SMITH: No, that isn't what we meant. I believe the gentleman
raised judicial strip mall and my guess is what he's referring to is
Home Depot and what Home Depot might mean.for us on the North Fork
and like trying,to compare Home Depot and what Home Depot might mean
to all of us to this. particular project. And, there is no
comparison. Under the very same standards of traffic generation, if
you look at the stamp for that type of a retail center, and you look
at the total square feet- per se, a, Home Depot at 100,000 sq. ft.,
you're looking at more trips in a peak out in and out. of 100,000 sq.
ft. Home Depot center, than you are at this facility in a day. That's
the comparison. That's why that. is an issue when you talk about
Route 58, Riverhead, where Home Depot is proposed.. It is entirely
different traffic stamp and with reference to libel, Riverhead Supply
is .insured, it is well insured, their insurance underwriters reviewed
this facility that's, being proposed and their new facility in,
Riverhead and make -recommendations further thesubj-ect to the State
Farm Building Codes and their regulated by OSHA. So, there's plenty
of insurance.and we try to avoid any accidents because it's costly to
the operation.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Has there been any incidents in the new
building that -you know?
..(Unidentified gentleman). In the new building?
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Yes.
(Unidentified gentleman)- No.
MR. SMITH: No incidents in the new building.
CHAIRMAN.GOEHRINGER:. Again for the record, that was both- Allen Smith
as co -counsel and Edgar Goodale.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Anybody else like to speak against? Alright.
MR:-. CORRAZINI: My name -is Rich Corrazini and the only question I
have is about the square footage of.the building.. How big is the one
in Riverhead?
MR.-DENIS: 125,000 sq. ft.
MR. CORRAZINI: .125,000 and this building is how big?
MR. DENIS: 50,000.
MR.-CORRZINI: 50.,000; OK.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER:- Excuse, me one second, Rich. Again for the
record, so I don't get yelled .,at, that was Donald Denis, answered
both of .those questions. This is from the Hay Harbor situation, OK.`
78- Page - HearilLy Transcripts
March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals
BOARD SECRETARY KOWALSKI: That was Donald Denis that answered this?
I thought Allen Smith answered that.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Was it Allen Smith? No, it was Donald Denis.
BOARD SECRETARY KOWALSKI: Oh it was, you fooled me that time.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Excuse me Rich, I apologize.
MR. CORRAZINI: My only thing ,is for Greenport. It just seems like
that- building is overkill, or is much more than is. needed for the
amount of people that's going in and out of there. You know, I don't
know, it's not golf ball, basket ball, it's more like baseball,
softball. You know, it's like half the size of the building in
Riverhead and 'the building in Riverhead is huge. It's a big
_building. That's all I have to say.
CHAIRMAN GOFHRINGER: Thank you. Yes, Mr. Italia.
MR. ITALIA: My name is Zito Italia. I think the- issue is the
traffic. I mean there's a tremendous amount, of traffic flowing
through Greenport there. The entrances and exits are right on the
main road. The bottlenecking through that area is going to be
tremendous. You're going to have westbound traffic, people trying to,
get out of this plaza or the lumber yard to go westbound, pulling in
front of eastbound traffic, fully loaded with plywood, lumber, it. is
an issue and we should look at it. Also, prior to handing out
anymore permits in this town, to various construction projects and
additions, there are some vacant facilities right here on .the main
road, in Southold Town. They have tumbleweed blown around from east
to west, not being utilized. But, we're going to give out a permit
for additional 52 or 53,000 sq. ft.. That's something that should be
looked -at too.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: I just want to reflection your traffic issue,
OK. What Mr. Smith was alluding to and I'm not speaking for him, was
that the Planning Board did look at the entire SEQUA issue, which is
the State and environmental issue, OK and you might want .to run, I
don't mean physically run but I mean you may want to go down to the
Planning Board and look at that LAF, which is long environmental
assessment form and if you have any specific questions after you
review it, you know, we can readdress those issues or address those
issues at the next hearing if you have a concern. Honestly, I mean,
you know we'd like you to look at them.
MR. ITALIA: No, I appreciate that. But, also, we're putting up
buffer building. Here we are we're gearing towards tourism,
vineyards, we're trying to make the North Fork of Long Island
different than other areas. .I mean somebody brought up an issue of
what's going on in Riverhead. 'I don't care about Riverhead. I pay
taxes right here in Southold Town. I moved here from Howard Beach,
Queens. I stopped in' G1en.Cove for a little bit, New Hyde Park. I
moved out here 11 years ago. I've been paying taxes out here for 11
years. I do not want the North Fork of Long Island to become like
79- Page - Hear.g Transcripts
March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals
Howard- Beach, -Queens,, or Glen Cove. This.:. is no,t what I want out here
and it's something that all of us live out here. for the same thing.
We have a hard' enough time going to a, going to Greenport just for
the Firehouse, the carnivals that they have. I mean the traffic is
just unbearable, even during the week. You try to go to for lunch
out there. You can't get up and down the main road. I.mean you're
saying that there.'s not a traffic issue.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: No, I'm not saying that. I'm saying that that
issue was an issue that was briefly before the Planning Board,
because they did the SEQUA review on this project. That's what I'm
saying.
MR. ITALIA: Also, meanwhile -we're- focusing towards, tourism and
putting up all of these. beautiful places, vineyards and everybody's
putting up. these beautiful halls and we have all these people coming
out here to spend money. .We're also going to 115 foot of the main
road, we're going to put up a butler building there. Everybodys
.going to be looking at .a butler building. I mean what I do for a
living is a construction is my main thing but, unfortunately I hate
to be a hypocrite. I do not want it in my, back yard. I don' t care
what goes on in Riverhead, but not in Southold Town. I am totally
against anything going .on out here. The reason,why people.moved out
here is, I mean we had people horsing around with horse farms earlier
tonight. I. agree with that gentleman. I mean we came out here to
live in the country and live out here to enjoy the country. We don't
need another 5.0,000 sq. ft. building. I It is an overkill. It's an
overkill. I mean if I need a piece of lumber that bad, I mean and I
can get my car ,and drive to Riverhead, whether it's Riverhead
Building Supply or Pergament, or Penny -Lumber. I mean why do we need
that out there? He built a beautiful Taj Mahal in Riverhead and I
think it's a beautiful place and it belongs in Riverhead. It does
not belong in Southold Town. Thank you for your time.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Thank you. Anybody else. Any questions from
the Board? Further Questions?
MEMBER TORTORA: I just would like to ,say something in -reference to
a, I just wanted to say in reference to .your comments about, the
Planning,Board's.concerns about parking. We have a copy of the memo.
You're asking you know, whether the code is.. right or not, that it is
not up to this Board to make that determination as you know. The
variance is a 100% request. The building is 525 feet.long, it's a
115 feet .wide, it is big for our little town. It's not my, you know,
this Board's place to pass judgment on whether .you're going ,to be
successful or not be successful, whether we like it or not, our
refuse is clearly the variance. To that end, to offset the magnitude
of- the 115 feet, I personally would like to,see a greater buffering
area in the front. I'm not asking.,you to move the building, but, 25
feet of buffering for 150 foot width is. not going to, is not
(coughing), that's my. question,, opinion, and a, you call it an
exchange, or can call it a swap', whatever you want, but, those are my
thoughts. I'm not saying. to, you know, rearrange -you're building,
how you do that, is something else, but, I personally would like to
80- Page Hearing Transcripts
March'23, 1998 -Board of Appeals
see, more buffering up there to offset the magnitude of the width
request that you're asking for. That's what I like to put on the
record.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Alright, where do we go from there Mrs. Moore
then? Do we recess without a date? Do we recess with a date? Do
you go back to the Planning Board in reference to the 10 feet that
you're talking about and then the additional request from Mrs.
Tortora? . I'm posing several options here. What I'm suggesting is,
we recess 'without a date, you're going back to the Planning Board
anyway to discuss with them the 10 feet that. they're requesting in
reference to the placement of the building, or not? You're not
giving it the 10 feet?
MRS. MOORE: I'd like to discuss it with, well certainly we can
discuss it with you. If we're talking about an. additional 10 feet
for buffer, what I'm suggesting to you is, that the code,. the intent
of the legislation I think I put it on the record. You know your own
views as we are with 20 feet, you are increasing the buffer, it's
greater -increase'-in buffer, �than any other parcel 'in this area
including the new Sunrise Coach.` You're asking for Riverhead
Building Supply to provide not only what they're providing which is
more than what the code requires, but, much more -
MEMBER TORTORA: 25 in the front? I'm talking about the front part.
MRS. MOORE: Yes, I'm looking at the front.
MEMBER TORTORA: -I'm talking about the front and the others have been
there for a long time'. This, is a' brand new structure and the others
are not 115 feet wide.
MRS. MOORE: No, no, no. You have Sunrise Coach which very recently
built that building.
MEMBER TORTORA: Yes, but it's not 115 feet wide.
MRS. MOORE: No I understand that, but, I mean you're talking about a
buffer area that if you compare this site to what is presently
existing, I understand that they're preexisting and you have a
preexisting condition here as well, which they are doing the best
that can be done, which is demolish the whole thing and starting
over. That's why' I say that the extra buffer, I'm not sure that
there's. there's, I'll talk to the clients whether or not they can
provide greater buffer. But, if you're saying. push the building
back, we're kind of, we're dealing with the retail parking, and if
you create a greater buffer,.you're essentially eliminating some very
important parking for the retail use. You are not going to want to
walk from the side of the building, you and I; you know, as a retail
user because that probably what will end 'up. We're not going to want
to park on the side -and walk around to the front of. the building.
And I know you've heard this over and over from most retail
operations, but parking has to be in the front.
81- Page - Heailrig Transcripts
March 23, 1998 -Board of Appeals
MEMBER TORTORA: That's why 'I'm not telling you how to do it.- I'm
just saying that is my personal feelings. You know, if you're
interested in economy those personal feelings, then, how you do that
is another thing. I'm not going to say to you, cut back your
building, wipe out your parking, that's not my thing. I'm saying
that I think 115 feet by 520 feet long building could benefit greatly
by more front, by buffering the front. I don't think that's an
unreasonable at all.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Alright, can we do this. Can you at least
discuss it with your clients and we'll recess for that date, you'll
go to the Planning Board and discuss the issue of the 10 feet that
they're requesting. Are they requesting an additional 10 feet? Is
that what I understand?
MRS. MOORE: Well, yes, I think that were. That came after the
fact. I mean -I went to the Planning Board, -.they gave a
recommendation and then it came later.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Alright, can we just get those two issues
concreted so that we know where we're going with it. If we're going
with it at all. Tell us when you want us to put it back on, we'll
finish it and get it done.
MRS. MOORE: Why don't you schedule it for the April is full, so,
right?
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: May 14th.
MRS. MOORE: But Bob Kassner is on vacation. He's the guy I have to
talk to unfortunately.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Alright, May
I'll make a motion recessing until
done by that time.
MEMBER DINIZIO: Second.
CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: All in favor?
14th. Hearing no further comment
May 14th and we'll have everything
Motion carried. See Minutes for resolution.
End of hearing.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR
Chairman
WILLIAM J. CREMERS
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR.
RICHARD G. WARD
4-U.- SUFFOLK
,
.r
.
ig
,
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
=State Environmental Quality Review
`-= -- - NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Notide' of Determination Non -Significant
Ck
August 11, 1997
Town Hall, 53095 Main
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 1�
Fax (516) 765-313E
Telephone (516) 765-1
This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations
pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the
Environmental Law.
The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the
proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the
environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared.
Name of Action: Proposed site plan for Riverhead Building Supply
SCTM#: 100046-1-2.1
Location: Main Rd., Greenport
SEAR Status: Type I ( )
Unlisted (X)
Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( )
No (X)
Description of Action:
This proposed site plan is for the construction of a 50,425 square foot lumber
yard supply building.
Page 2
SEQR Negative Declaration -Riverhead Building Supply
August 11, 1997
Reasons Supporting This Determination:
This project involves the construction of a 50,425 square foot lumber yard supply
building. A variance application is before the Board of Appeals for building
width. The building width must be approved by the Board of Appeals before site
plan approval. A full environmental impact statement Vas reviewed by the
town's consultant in conjunction with the zone change application to the Town
Board. A lumber yard supply building is a permitted use in this Light Industrial
Park/Planned Office Park (LIO), thus the proposed action is consistent with
zoning.
An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed,.
and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the
environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented
as planned.
There has not been any correspondence received from the New York State
Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time.
Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections
from that agency.
The applicant will have to comply with the requirements of the Suffolk
County Sanitary Code (SCSC) and all relevant standards of water supply
and sewage disposal systems. Design and flow specification, subsurface
soil conditions and site plan details will have to be approved by the Suffolk
County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). This, impact is not
considered significant due to the anticipated project compliance with
established requirements of the SCSC and the SCDHS and the required
relevant permits.
- For Further Information: .
Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner
Address:, Planning Board
Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938
cc: John P. Cahill, DEC Albany
Suffolk County Dept. of Health
Suffolk County Water Authority
New York State Dept. of Transportation
Judith Terry, Town Clerk
Suffolk County Dept. of Public Works
Southold Town Building Dept.
Applicant
•
s
c�
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR.
{�
Chairman
WILLIAM J. CREMERS
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR.
RICHARD G. WARD
August 12, 1997
Patricia Moore, Esq.
P.O. Box 483
Mattituck, NY 11952
�`OSurl•o(�� `
VV
OGy�
.
c�
Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa
P.O. Box 1179
Southold,
{�
New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-3136
Telephone (516) 765-1938
P. - I1VG CARD OFFICE
- ��T SQ_W FSO IT i OLD
�,�,I'I
6
Re: Proposed site plan for Riverhead Building Supply
SCTM# 1000-46-1-2.1
Dear Ms. Moore:
The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a
meeting held on Monday, August 11, 1997:
BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the
State Environmental Quality Review Act, establishes itself as lead agency, and
as lead agency makes a determination of non -significance, and grants a
Negative Declaration.
- Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records.
Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above.
Sincerely,
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
enc.
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
James Dinizio, Jr.
Lydia A. Tortora
Lora S. Collins
George Homing
MEMORANDUM
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
TO: Planning Board
FROM: G. Goehringer, ZBA
DATE: March 4, 1998
SUBJECT: Riverhead Building
Chairman
Supply Project
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
ZBA Fax (516) 765-9064
Telephone (516) 765-1809
We have received inquiries with regard to Route 25 in the area of
the above project, Moore's Lane, 7-11, and other business/industrial
uses, and whether or not information was requested about the
frequency of trailer trucks entering, exiting, loading and unloading
as well as other vehicles. Attorney Patricia Moore, as agent for
the applicant, furnished a copy of the SEQRA determination of
non -significance for this project today, and there is no . indication
whether the traffic issues were addressed . or requested by the
Planning Board as lead agency for consideration.
The Board of Appeals hearing regarding the building width and
fence height ' will be held on March 23, 1998. We would like to
provide the Planning Board with an opportunity to furnish comments
to us under the site plan pending for a 115 ft. wide building and
8 -ft. fence height. Also, please furnish reasons supporting your
comments (or site plan preference) with respect to these site
planning, considerations, and with respect to the paragraph above.
Thank you.
r' ,1%
PATRICIA C. MOORE
Attomey at Law
51020 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Southold Town
Board of Appeals
53095 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Att: Ms. Linda Kowalski
Dear Linda:
Tel: (516) 765-4330
Fax: (516) 765-4643
1 JUN 21998
1, IBJ
June 1, 1998
RE: Riverhead Building Supply Corp. Application
Hearing Date: June 11, 1998
Enclosed please find completed Affidavit of Mailing with
postmarked receipts from the post office for the above referenced
matter. The return receipt cards will be forwarded to you upon
our receipt of same.
Also enclosed is the completed Affidavit of Posting for this
matter.
Very truly yours,
Patricia C. Moore
PCM/mr
Encls.
I r
BOARD OF APPEALS : TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
-----------------------------------x
In the Matter of the Application
of
Riverhead Building Supply
(Name of Applicants)
------------------------------------x
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)
STATE OF NEW YORK)
I, Patricia C. Moore
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING AND POSTING
residin at Terry Lane, Southold
New York, being duly sworn, de ose and say
1) the day
by certified, mail return
attached Le1 Notice, a
persons at th addresses
the addresses ed below
ment rolls of the own of
the United States ost
return receipt reques ed _
TO
and,
that:
of , 199 I personally mailed,
receipt requested, a true copy of the
ddressed to , each of the following named
set opposite their respective names, that
are those shown on the current assess -
Southold; that said Notices were mailed at
ffice to each name below certified mail,
attach post office receipts here):
Mailing Address
2),On the 29th day of May, 1998, I personally postgd the
subject property identified as District 1000, Section 46 ,
Block. 1 , Lot' 1 and 2. 1, by placing the Town's official poster
ten (10) feet, or closer, from the property line facing the street or
facing the right-of-way, and that I have checked to be sure the
poster has remained in place for . seven full days prior to the subject
hearing date, which is June 11, 1998.
Sworn to before me this (signature)
,� 9 r* day of M * y 199 8
MARGARET C. RUTKOWSKI
Notary Public, State of New York
NoA982528
Nofary Public Oualifiad in Suffolk County
Cor mOssion Expires Juno 3.19_9q
**Please return to the office of the Board of Appeals when completed.
(Town Hall hours are 8 - 4 p.m.) Thank you.
§ 58-1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING § 58-1
Chapter 58
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
§58-1. Providing notice of public hearings.
[HISTORY: Adopted by the Town Board of the Town of
Southold 12-27-1995 as L.L. No. 25-1995. Amendments
noted where applicable.]
§ 58-1. Providing notice of public hearings.
Whenever the Code calls for a public hearing, this section
shall apply. Upon determining that an application is complete,
the board or commission reviewing the same shall fix a time
and place for a public hearing thereon. The board or commission
reviewing an application shall provide for the giving of notice:
A. By causing a notice giving the time, date, place and
nature of the hearing to be published in the official
newspaper within the period prescribed by law.
B. By requiring the applicant to erect the sign provided by
the town, which shall be prominently displayed on the
premises facing each public or private street which the
property involved in the application abuts, giving notice
of the application, the nature of the approval sought
thereby and the time and place of the public hearing
thereon. The sign shall be set back not more than ten
(10) feet from the property line. The sign shall be
displayed for a period of not less than seven (7) days
immediately preceding the date of the public hearing.
The applicant or his/her agent shall file an affidavit that
s/he has complied with this provision.
C. By requiring the applicant to send notice to the owners
of record of every property which abuts and every
property which is across from any public or private street
§ 58-1 SOUTHOLD CODE § 58-1
from the property included in the application. Such
notice shall be made by certified mail, return receipt
requested, posted at least seven (7) days prior to the date
of the initial public hearing on the application and
addressed to the owners at the addressee listed for them
on the local assessment roll. The applicant or agent shall
file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this
provision.
r
� I
BOARD OF APPEALS:TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
..----------------------------------x
In the Matter of the Application
M
Riverhead Building Supply
(Name of Applicants)
--------------------t=---------------x
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)
STATE OF NEW YORK)
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING AND POSTING
I, Margaret Rutkowski , residing at Theresa Drive, Mattituck,
New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that:
1) On the 29th day of May , .199 8, I personally mailed,
by certified mail, return receipt r(- ,rested, a true copy of the
attached Legal Notice, addressed t(,,, -each of the following named
persons at the addresses set opposit �: their respective names, that
the addresses listed below are those sli awn on the current assess-
ment rolls of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at
the United States Post Office to each name below certified mail,
return receipt requested attach post office receipts here):
Name of Surrounding Property Owner Mailing Address
Thomas Jurzenia & wf 675 Silvermere Road, P.O. Box 285, Greenport, NY 11944
Philip & Patricia Marcario 2878 N. Wading River Road, Wading River, NY 11792
Joseph Caputo P.O. Box 256, Shoreham, NY 11786
Robert Brown P.O. Box 2050 Greenport NY 11944
Colgate Design Corp c/o Southland Corp, P.O.-Box 711 Dallas. TX 75221-9867
New York Telephone Co 1095 Ave of the -Americas, 38th F1, New York, NY 10036
Anne Marie Nelson c/o The Bank of New York Trust Company of Florida, N.A.
800 Brickell Avenue, Suite 300, Miami, FL 33131
and,
2)
y__ On the day
of 199'
, I personally posted the
subject
property identified as
District 1000,
Section
,
;t Block
Lot
by placing
the Town's
official poster
ten (10) feet, or closer, from the property
line facing
the street or
facing
the right-of-way, and that I have
checked to
be sure the
poster has remained in place
for seven full
days prior
to the subject
hearing
date, which is
199' .
Sworn to before me this
29thda of Ma 199 g
NoTary Public
**Please return to the office of
(Town Hall hours are 8 - 4 p.m.)
PATRICK C. MOORE
NOW Puft State of New York
Suffolk County - Na 481118118
CenMils m E*kn June 111, 99
the Board of Appeals when completed.
Thank you.
l._
§ 58-1 NOTICE ,OF PUBLIC HEARING § 58-1
Chapter 58
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
§58-1. Providing notice of public hearings.
(HIS'T'ORY: Adopted by the Town Board of the Town of
Southold 12-27=1995 as L.L. No. 25-1995. Amendments
noted where applicable.]
§ 58-1. Providing notice of public hearings.
Whenever the Code calls for a public hearing, this section
shall apply. Upon determining that an application is complete,
the board or commission reviewing the same shall fix a time
and place for a public hearing thereon. The board or commission
reviewing an application shall provide for the giving of notice:
A. By causing a notice giving the time, date, place and
nature . of the hearing to be published in the official
newspaper within the period prescribed by law.
B. By requiring the applicant to erect the sign provided by
the town, which shall be prominently displayed on the
premises facing each public or private street which the
property involved in the application abuts, giving notice
of the application, the nature of the approval sought
thereby and -the time and place of the public hearing
thereon. The sign shall be set back not more than ten
(10) feet from the property line. The sign shall be
displayed for 'a period of not less than seven (7) days
immediately preceding the date of the public hearing.
The applicant or his/her agent shall file an affidavit that
s/he has complied with this provision.
C. By requiring the applicant to send notice to the owners
of record of every property which abuts and every
property which is across from any public or private street
§ 58-1 SOUTHOLD CODE 1458-1
from the property included in the application. Such
notice shall be made by certified mail, return receipt
requested, posted at least seven (7) days prior to the date
ijs gp�,:�ui olT ,tlievl finial public hearing on the application and
fiv 044d"r-94sedrt:ii-""the owners at the addresses listed- Cor them
roll. The applicant or agent shall
� ,'fit -n' t"O' '( j;eb°"asp"Ni'trid'avit that -s/he has complied with this
provision'.
NOTICE OF HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road,
Southold, New York, concerning this property.
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
1�qmes - ':J"Umo //'
If you have an interest in this project, you are invited to view the Town files)
which are available for inspection prior to the day of the hearing during' normal
business days between the hours of 3 a.m. and
BOARD OF APPEALS •TOWN OF SOUTHOLD e (516) 765-1809
r
iJ
N 0PCON]TR9CTroN
CORP.
:D SITE PLAN
-10--0-
1;
ARCHITECT.
JOB,
SCALE.I• [0,_O,
DRAWING NO.
DONALD A. DENI5
SITE LAYOUT:
JOB NO,9t01
DATE. 19 JULY lilt
SLS
f1AIN ROAD
D
RI BUILDING
BUILDING SUPPLY
j^'�`�-'�( �(]2j�� j�j� /�
Il ll V LL`' 111/111/ 'L�Lr�l
u O \Y/ 1.� RI�IIa !LN D o UOLDONQ SUPPLY
REV..
f> .J�
,ILJII
AOUE8000E, N.Y.
AQUEBO
MAIN ROAD IRT.76I
GREENPORi. NY
GREEMPOO Q4 VAARDD
L//r'/1'l`\,
f6I0177-36II
OP
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR.
Chairman
WILLIAM J. CREMERS
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR.
RICHARD G. WARD
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request
Dear Reviewer:
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental
Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR
Part 617 the following:
1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below;
2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and
3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated.
Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental
Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response.
f Ro o -5910 17',Ew /= o /�
Project Name: f? Ct,,1=/< 14,6 /f D P u//- P//�OL S C4
Requested Action: c--� 6 /,/ S T IC o
eODT
SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I
(>� Unlisted
Contact Person: . [� , /</�4
(516) 765-1938
971
)38
Page 2
Lead Agency Coordination Request
The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS)
on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in
writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency.
Planni g Board Position:
( ) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action.
( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency
status for this action.
( ) Other (see comments below)
Comments: S P� �� S %^o a C�i v L f� �7� T�/y�
13 4(f �- fi f9 D 1�(,Ekl 5c,,> /V-�, S- S g �W /le'6
OF Gaj-PrllG-
Please feel free to contact this office for further information.
Sincerely,
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
-* cc: Board of Appeals
Building Department
Southold Town Board
Suffolk County Department of Health Services
NYSE) EG-StGpqL��
NYSDEC - Albany
,%ffell .Geunty-DepaFtfneRt-of- bfiGA4e k -s--
;K- New York State Department of Transportation
Thomas Cybulski, Greenport Public Utilities
Raymond VanEtten, Greenport Village Administrator
Suffolk County Water Authority
*Maps are enclosed for your review rev. 4/94
AYA r
617.21 SE'DR
Appendix A
State Environmental Quality Review
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
Purpose: The full E,-�F is designed to help acolicants and agencies determine, in an ordedv manner, whether a projec:
or action may be significant. The question of .whether an action may be significant is not always e35v to answer. =requent-
ly, there are aspects or a projec: that are subjective or unmeasirreablr•_. It is also understood that those who determine
significance may have little or no formal knovdedge of the environment or may be :ethnically expert in environmental
analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware or the broader concerns afrec,;ng
the question of significance.
The full E,-kF is intended to provide a method .vherebv applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination
process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature. yet flexible to allow introduction or information to fit a protect or action.
Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts:
Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a -given project and its site. f5)' identifying basic project
data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts ? and 3.
Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a L r.-_,jr:- r rr• ar-zion. It crcvides
guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered smail to moderate or •.whether it Is a potentially -
large impact. The form also idendries whether an Impact can be mrtiOated or reduced.
Part 3: If anv impact in Part 2 is identified as potentiaily-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the
impac, is ac,ually important.
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted ,actions
Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: C Part 1 _ Part 2 CPart 3
U,..)on review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 -and 3 and 3 if aoorocriate), and any other su-;porting
information, and considering both the magitude and importance or each impact. it is reasonably determined by the
lead agency that:
A. The project will not result in anv large and imoortant impact(s) and, therefore. is one which will not
have a;herefore a negative declaration will be prepared.
significant impact on the environment.
O 8. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant
effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures -described in P,�RT 3 have been reouired,
therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be preRared.'
❑ C. The oroject may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant imoac,
on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will lie prepared.
' A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted actions
:r
Name of Action l) I
.
RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY SITE PLAN APPLICATIO
,Name or Lead :\I;cncy
PLANNING BOARD
Print or Type Mame of Respunsrbie Ulf icer :n '_gad Ai -f; ncv
Si:;naturc: of RcSocnscifll: Cfficur :n I.I•.:d
Title of Rcspon5ibic Cifriccr
Slgn.Ilure pl 1'rep,arur0f _4iff,-ren( from reSAUrSIb e 0 1 er)
Q ate
�
`r;F
PART 1 --PROSECT INFORMATIrA
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effe,1
on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considereo\
as part of the application for Approval and may be subject to further verification :spd public review. Provide any additional
Information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent orlinformation currently available and will not involve
new studies, research or investigation. If Information requiring such additional work. Is unavailable, so indicate and specify
each instance. +,
NAME OF ACTION
SITE PLA
A. Site Description
LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, MunlclpsIlly and County)
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. ,
SIS ROUTE 25
GREENPORT NEW YORK
(suburban) QRural (non-farm)
NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR
t
BUSINESS TELEPHONE
RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY CORP.
( 727-3947
ADDRESS
1
.
c/o Allen M.
Smith Esq. 737 Roanoke Avenue P.O.Box'1240
acres acres
CITYfPO i i • t
Riverhead, New York 11901 (and)
STATS
LP CODE
NAmc OF
Patricia C.
'.t ... •� •, Hit I
Moore
iBUSINESS TELEPHONE
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces
acres 63% Acres
:I )298-5629
ADDRESS
3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project sites Haven Loam
a. Soil drainage: OWell drained inn % of site '•, UModerately wellidrained -- %'of site
t halia Road
CITYIPO
Land Classification System? 0 acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370).'
STATE
ZIP CODE
Mattituck
NY 11952
2
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
Site plan_
of Riverhead Building Supply= • oto ' fa612•t2.te
the
expansion-
of _ th( Building .,Suuply . • ,
Please Complete Each Question— Indicate N.A. If not applicable
A. Site Description
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. ,
1. Present land use: DUrban Olndustrial , ._ OCommercial • . OResidential
(suburban) QRural (non-farm)
O.Forest OAgriculture QOther,,- ;,ae,9R,
.,oldfield/woodland
2. Total acreage of project area: 3.3 :acres,
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE +. •,II �•: ►t
PRESENTLY ' AFT_ FMPI ETION
Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 1007
:acres' , 3.�% acres
Forested —
acres acres
Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0
acres acres
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) 0
acres acres
Water Surface Area 0
acres acres
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill)
acres acres
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces
acres 63% Acres
Other
Other (Indicate type)
acres acres
3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project sites Haven Loam
a. Soil drainage: OWell drained inn % of site '•, UModerately wellidrained -- %'of site
OPoorly drained % of site
b. If any agricultural land Is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS
Land Classification System? 0 acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370).'
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings onroject site? ❑Yes qNO
a. What is depth.to•bedrockf -
(in feet)
2
`5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 00100A _ t.11fj d/° 010.15°rb
015% or greater %
% 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a 'building, site, or district, listed on the State or the Na
Registers of Historic Places? Oyes LINO ; , ,; .i ; ,;, :• , tional
7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Oyes ®No
8. What is the depth of the water table? l4 . (in feet)'
9. Is site located over a primary, principal,- or sole source Aqulfef?6Ye3i'. [' "ONo
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Oyes BNo
11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that Is ridentified as threatened or endangered?
Oyes Ix-lNO According to
Identify each species
12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on, the project site? (i.e., ' cliffs, dunes, othef' geological formations)
OYes QNo Describe
13. Is the project site presently used by the community'or neighborhood as' an' opert space'or recreation area?
Oyes ONO. If. yes, explain
14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be Important to the .community? .
Oyes 12No "
no
15. Streams within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it Is tributary
16. Lukes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: no.
a. Name
by—existing b. Size (In acres)
17. Is the site served
public utilities? . Qyes ONO
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? , ? ,
b) If 'Yes, will Improvements be necessary to allow connection? C]Yes IiNo
18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified
Section 303 and 304? OYes Oklo Pursuant to Agriculture and' Markets Law, Article 25 -AA,
19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8
of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? OYes ®No
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? „OYes , ONO 1
B. Projrnt Description '
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill In dimensions as appropriate) ,
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor ___,initially;
b. Project acreage to be developed: - ---�— acres. existing Riverhead
--�_ acres initially; 5.7
c. Project acreage to remain acres ultimately. Build. supe .
acres.*per site plan•(3;5r%.)
d. Length of project, in miles: n/a
. (If appropriate)
e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed
f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing * %;
----__; proposed * per site plan
g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour — (D Parr (upon completion ofro ect)? P
p j ITE � R� Trip
h. If residential: Number and type of housing units:
One Family Manual estim.
Initially y Two. Family Multiple Family , Condominium
Ultimately
L Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure
height; width; length.
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? _32-5_ ft. approx.
3
min. N .. !.
2. Flow much natural material (i.e.,4r rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? tons/cubic yank,
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? OYes ONo : -ADN/A \
a. If yes, for what Intend—` purpose is the site being -reclaimed?
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes ON,o
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? l' OYes } ON
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from -site? _ . -9 acres.
5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally -important vegetation be removed by this' project?
, OYes f3N'o
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 12 months, (including demolition).
7. If multi -phased: ,-•• '
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). ! ;
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1,____month ..year, (including demolition).
c. Approximate completion date of final phase month _- :.. year. ':! .
d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? OYes ONO,
8. Will blasting occur during construction? OYes 30 EINO ' .. 15726
9. Number . of jobs generated: during construction ; after project Is complete J
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 10'
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? []Yes ®No If yes, explain
• - I
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes !- . ®No
a. If yes, Indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount. _--_
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? f?Yes 1'No . Type _Priyate-.Septic System
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? -�'TOYes ' 'ONo
Explain n/a + •
15. Is project or any portion of project located In a 100,year flood plain?.!:;,'.-,,OYes, it. ONo
16. Will the project generate solid waste? INYes
a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons ! ,'•t';':),,. ++
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be' used?.:E]Yes ONo
c. If yes, give name , +, o t -a,- _-_ I 'location '
d. Will any wastes not go Into a sewage disposal system or Into a sanitary landfill? OYes ONo
e. If Yes, explain
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? " JYes I)Nol''ti '' '.�•? i.vlr. II
a. If yes, what Is the anticipated rate of disposal] demo. de tons/month: !'
b. It yes, what is the anticipated site life? _ years,
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? OYes UNO
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? OYes xQNo
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels?, i. OYes. bNo ,
21. Will project result in an increase In energy use? Oyes. ,pNo ; ,•,� err,. +• . ..• ,,
If yes', indicate type(s) Electricity; heating fuel
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute.
23. Total anticipated water usage per day "d gallons/day,
24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? OYes bNo
if Yes, explain
n
,25. Approvals Required: "=
Submittal
Type Date
City, Town, Village Board IlYes ONo _Southold Town Board' received
City, Town, Village Planning Board ffYes DNo Southold Town planning Board
City, Town Zoning Board Dyes DNo
City, County Health Department V$Yes DNo SyFF-oLV- Coyniry HFA(Ttj p.Efl- sanitary
Other Local Agencies DYes DNo
Other Regional Agencies DYes DNo
State Agencies I�RYes DNo NYS DOT curb cut
Federal Agencies DYes DNo
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1. Does proposed action involve'a planning or zoning decision? DYes DNo
If Yes, indicate decision required:
Moning amendment Dzoning variance Dspecial use permit Dsubdivision site plan
Onew/revision of master plan Dresource management plan bother
2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? HD
3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
25 multifamily units ( previuus approvals on record)
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? LIO
S. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
�*+o Riii1dinv Supply building
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? DYes DNo
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/. mile radius of proposed action?
Commercial/ Industrial
(and residential)
8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoin ing/surrounding land uses within a 1/. mile? 13Yes DNo
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed?
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed?
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or .water districts? DYes ®No
11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community' provided services (recreation, education, police,
fire protection)? DYes 9No
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? DYes DNo
12. Will the proposed action result In the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Dyes ®No
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? DYes DNo -
D. Informational Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse
impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which yod propose to mitigate or
avoid them.
E. Verification
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant/Spo ame Riverhead Building Supply Dateto l ti y
Signature Title
If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coas I Assessment Form before proceeding
with this assessment.
5
RIVERHEAD BUILDING
SUPPLY CO.. (Re -opened as-
per
s-per Board Resolution adopted
May 19,1998). This is a variance
request based upon -the Building
Inspector's January 2, 1998 No-
tice of Disapproval which reads
as follows: "...1) the proposed
structure being located in an LIO
District is 'permitted to have a
maximum of 60 feet of frontage
on one street. The -proposed
building is approximately 115 ft.
facing Rt. 25. Pursuant to Article
XIII, Section 100-133C; 2) -
When fences are located in or
along side and rear yards, they
shall 'not exceed 6'/z feet- in
height, pursuant to 100-231 B..."
Location of Property: 746.10 and
74500 Main Road, Greenport,
NY; 1000-46-1-1 and 2.l,com-
bined as a single lot. ' -
6:05 p.m. Appl. No. 4568-
DOMINICK SEGRETE. This
is a variance request under the
Zoning Code, Article XXII, Sec-
tion 100-239.4B,• based upon the -
Building Inspector's April 9,
1998 Notice of Disapproval, dis-
approving a building permit ap-
plication for an inground pool
and deck addition due to`its pro-
posed location within 75 feet
from the bulkhead, concrete
wall, rip rap or similar structure,
at 4000 Wunneweta Road,
Nassau Point Club Properties,
Cutchogue, NY; 1000-111=14=
22.1.
6:10 p.m. Appl.' No. 4569=
FRANK KROPF. This is a
variance request under Zoning
Code Article III, Section 100-33,
based upon- the Building
Inspector's April 8, 1998 Notice
of Disapproval, disapproving a
building permit application for
an addition which will create a
non -conformity in that the exist-
ing garage will not be located in
the rear yard at 1820 Marlene
Lane, Laurel, NY; 1000-1.-4.4-2- ;
33. -
6:15 p.m. Appl. No. 4570 -
JOSEPH FRAZZITTA. This,
is a variance request under the -
Zoning Code, Article XXIII,
Section 100-239.413 for permis-
sion to construct deck addition
with gazebo"at a setback of less
than 75 feet from the bulkhead
at 1420 InletWay at Cedar
Beach, Southold, NY; 1000-92-
1-6.
6:20 p.m. Appl No. 4572 -
NICHOLAS METHVAN.
This is a variance request under -
the Zoning Code, Article XXIV,
Section 100-244B, based upon
the Building Inspector's April 16,
1998 and April •19,1998 Notices
of Disapproval, disapproving a -
building permit application for a
deck, and addition which -will
exceed the allowable, lot cover-
age of 20% for this nonconform-
ing lot. Location of -Property:
1630 Theresa Drive, Mattituck-,
NY;,10007115-14-3;.also known:
-"as Lot-6;'DWp. ;Hole'Creek-E5=
tates. `
6:25 p.m Appl. No. 4574-'
PREM CHATPAR. This is,a
variance request under the
Zon-ing Code Article XXIII, Section
1'00-239.4B based upon the
Building Inspector's March 10,
1998 and January -6,1997 disap-
proving a building permit appli=
cation for a proposed (two-story)
addition oto dwelling and pro-
posed accessory garage location -
whichate proposed within 75.
feet of a bulkhead, concrete wall,
or similar,�tru
scture. Applicant's
February x;1998 Affidavit states
+ the proposed use ofgarage to be
r
fo"occiipialile:spae6" intended
as a-family,room', library/study
with- wefA ar facility:- Another
j
January `6, j0'97 Notice of Dis='
approval regarding,tliis site was
,issued disapproving a proposed
guest annex m proposed acces-
(,, `y garage, Article III, Section
,,,,J-31B(13).Location ofProp
-
erty; 680 Midway Road, 1
Southold, NY; 1.000-90-2=9.1;
Cedar Beach Park, Lot 111-112- j
part of 144 (as a single parcel).
- 6:40 p.m. Appl. No. 4575 -
FRANK GASTON" . This is a
variance request under the Zon-
ing Code Article XXIII; Section
100-239AB based upon the i
Building Inspector's August 20,
1997 Notice of Disapproval (up- !
dated -5/7/98), disapproving a
building permit application for a
deck addition to dwelling with a, -
setback at less than 75 feet from
a bulkhead, concrete wall, 'or
similar structure,, at.. 1875
Bayview Avenue, Greenport,.,
NY; 1000-52-5-5. I
6:45 p.m. Appl. No. 4571 -
WALTER MILLIS. This is a
variance request under the Zon-
ing Code Article IIIA-, Section
100-30A.3, based upon the.
Building Inspector's April 14, 1
1998 Notice of Disapproval, dis-
approving a building permit ap-
plication to remove existing shed
and replace with accessory ga-
rage, which will exceed allow-
able -lot coverage of 20% at 1800
(a/k/a 1875) Village Lane, Ori-
ent, NY; 10000-24-2-22.
6:50 p.m. Appl. No: 4576-
CHARLES D. SNYDER. This
is a variance request under the
Zoning Code, Article IIIA, Sec-
tion 100-30A.4, based upon the
Building Inspector's May 8, 1998
Notice of Disapproval, disap-
proving a building permit appli-
cation for an accessory garage
due to its proposed location in an l
area other than the rear yard 'at
704 Wiggins Lane, -Greenport;
1000-35-4-28.24 (formerly
CTM Lot 19). =
6:55 p.m; Appl: No. 4577-
CARL AND LYNNE
FRITSCHER. This is a vari-
&=6request under Article based .
upon the Building Inspector's
May 8, 1998 Notice of Disap-
proval, disapproving a building
permit. application for a new
single-family dwelling with pro-
posed front yard setbacks of less
than 50 feet. Location of Prop-
erty: 135 Pine Tree Court, and
along Pine Court Extension (a/
k/a Private Roads), Cuichogue,
NY; 1000-98-1-7..15.
7:10 p.m. Appl. No. 4578
STEPHEN AND ANGELA
PUTZI. This is a variance re-
questunder Article IIIA, Section
100-30A.4, based upon the
Building Inspector's April 28,
1998 Notice of Disapproval, dis-
approving a building permit ap-
plication -to construct addition to --
a existing accessory garage in
a front yard location at 2575 (a/
k/a 2500) Lighthouse -Road and
Soundview Avenue;' Southold, f
NY- 1000-50-3-6.:.
7:15 n.m. Anol.- No. 4579-
CIELA-TKA. This is 'a request
foraSplocial Exception to estab-
lish Accessory Apartment Use in f
the principal building of the f
owner -applicants as provided
under- Article III, Section' 100-
•31B-13 (formerly, 100-31B-14)
of the Zoning Code. Location Or 1
P,roperty:. 260 Cedar Summit I to be heard in the above l`
Road, Southold, NY; 1.000-78-9- ci abuse on the lot desiring to sub
re (Bayside Terrace')'. beingtheP p applications ,or desiring
mit written statements before the, ''
. 7:20 p.m. Appl._ No. 4580- , is required to have to end of each hearing•
ALBERT AND JANICE' setback' of 70 feet pursuant the pro-- will not start ear- '
RATTI. This is, a variance -re- Art. XIV; 100-142; 3) Then designated.
quest.under Article XXIV,.Sec posed tower is requued to be 10-
lier than designated. The file is.
tion. 100-242 (.100-244); based cated at least one -hundred 'dwelling
available for review during r hours (8-,
upon the Building' Inspector's feet from the nearest' dwelling lar Town gall business 1{
unit pursuant to Article xvl 4 p m) If you have questions,
May 1.9, 1998 Notice of Disap- Section 100-162C.3... _ lease°do-iiothesitateto ca1h765
proval, disapproving a ;building The Board of Appehls will -at- p ;
permit application to reconstruct said time and place hear any and 18 Dated: May 20.1998
dwelling which tha50 % by fire and p pro,- I' all persons or representatives BY ORDER OF THE,more,
BOARD'1
i SOUTHOLD T OF APPEALS,
i GERARD P GOEHRINGER,!
Chairman
_ 1X-5128198(172),
b UUM
ON O
PP OF THE NEWS
-
LEGAL NOTICE
SOUTHOLD TOWN
BOARD OF APPEALS
NOTICE -IS' HEREBY i
GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267
of the Town Law and the Code !
of 'the- Town. of Southold, -the t
following -applications, will be
held for public hearings by the
. SOUTHOLD-TOWN BOARD
OF APPEALS, -at the Southold
Town Hall,` 53095 Main Roads
Southold, New York 11971;on i
THURSDAY, JUNE 11;1997
as noted below (or as:soon there-
( after as possible):
r 5:45 p.m. N'06 No.
COUNTY
Yacht
j Sales, Appt.
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
STATE OF NEW YORK ss:
Patricia C. Lollot, being duly sworn, says that
she is the Production Coordinator, of the TRAV-
ELER WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed
at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the no-
tice of which the annexed is a printed copy,
has been published in said Traveler Watchman
once each week for
.....................weeks
..................................................
successively, commencing on the ...%9 ..........
u
day o
.........�.... ......... ........ .19.47
.
.. ...
......................................
...a
Sworn to before me this..........�.... ...-'dYof
................................... ........ ,19... lQ�
............. ....................G� .
Notary Public
BARBARA A. SCHNEIDER
NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New York
No. 4806846
Qualified in Suffolk Coun
Commission Expires 83/98'
posed to be rebuilt witli ;an in-
sufficient front yard setback.
Location of Property: '420
Lesters Road, Mattituck;: 1000-
114-7-8.
7:30 p.m. Appl. No. 4544- .
MARTIN ROS EN (OWNER:
O BOOKER &ANO.) Loca-
tion of Property: 11780 Sound
Avenue, Mattituck, NY; County
Parcel #1000--141-3.-44. This is
a request for Interpretation and/
or Variances based upon the
"Building Inspector's February
181998 Notice of Disapproval,
disapproving a building permit
application to construct.a tower
for telecommunications use, for
the following reason: 1) the pro-
posed telecommunications tower
being located on a nonconform-
ing. lot in an LI -District •is not
permitted according to Section
100-16513; 2) the proposed tower j
(1-516) 765-1809 tel.
OFFICE OF
BOARD OF APPEALS
53095 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
(1-516) 765-9064 fax.
May 20, 1998
Re: ZBA Application
Hearing Date: Thursday, June 11, 1998
Dear
Q. I
For your records, please find enclosed a copy of the Legal Notice
describing the time,. date and place of the public hearing regarding your
application. (Our department will arrange for publication in the official
newspaper: L.I. Traveler, Southold.)
Town Code Chapter 58, . requires. that the applicant send "NOTICE
GIVING THE TIME, DATE, PLACE AND NATURE OF THE HEARING." Please
send a copy of a map showing the proposed project area, together with a
cover letter with your name and address to the "OWNERS shown on the
local assessment roll for every property which abuts and is across from any
public or private street from the applicant's property." These mailings
must be by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, within five
(5) days of receiving this- letter. This will allow for the green signature
cards to be returned to you., and then submitted to us for the official.
(If the green signature cards are not received by the hearing date, a delay
is possible before receiving action by the Board.)
Please be sure to:
I. "return the Affidavit of Mailing to' us when the certified mail
receipts are postmarked on the day of mailing, attaching a written list
signed by the person verifying the same from the Assessors' Assessment
Roll, which lists all the lot numbers and owners' names, current addresses
from on -the local assessment rolls, and the date the listing was obtained
from the Assessors' Office.
2. Place the enclosed Poster in the location described by Ch. 58 of
the Code, within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street, for a
time period of not less than seven days. The sign must be posted not later
than June 3rd.
3. Return a completed Affidavit of Posting by the hearing date.
4. Return the green signature cards at or before the hearing.
Page 2 - Instruction Letter
Meeting of April 16, 1998
Southold Town Board of Appeals
Please call if you have any questions. Thank you.
Very truly yours,
Gerard P. Goehringer
Chairman
by Linda Kowalski/�
Enclosures (Notice, Two Affidavits, and Sign)
AS400/txt1k/1nag.98/app1.1n
VIW.d
............................................................................... TRANSMISSION RESULT REPORT .................... ( MAY 22 '98 09:34AM ).................,
SOL LD TOWN HALL 516 765 1823
.................................................................... ..............................................:.....:.............................. ........... ............. :. (AUTO) ......................
DATE START REMOTE TERMINAL, TIME RE- MODE TOTAL PERSONAL LABEL FILE
TIME IDENTIFICATION SULTS PAGES 'NO.
09. 33
MAY 2 RM~ 5167654643 01'42" OK ESCED
004
..O.. NN......... 6.440............1.1 •6......•.......#6040400..... H6••164000 ..... .11U•R•.... .4.4.46.• .......
)4e1N0H.U•.000H R•.pH.l.H 01H•..H..HIU UI•.....14.6H 00.•1. H.110•U•.•l.H H11N01•.•II N
E)ECM >)REDUCTION S)STRNDARD M)MEMORY C)CONFIDENTIAL #)BATCH
D)DETAIL $)TRANSFER
F)FINE P)POLLING
e&44oA4>
1N6 , F C r //,
q
NOTICE OF HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road,
Southold, New York, concerning this property.
OWNER(S) OF RECORD:
✓�/%£q� „6ruLd/N6 SicPPI�
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
�uRs . � a 0 //, /998
ter'.• �6p.ow
If you have an interest in this project, you are invited to view the Town file(s)
which are available for inspection prior to the day of the hearing during' normal
business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
BOARD OF APPEALS •TOWN OF SOUTHOLD e (516) 765-1809
Vp 1b)✓CXs goo -133C
•
ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
MARRIAGE OFFICER
RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER
�f�o�S�fFOL��oG
o y�
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold;'New York 11971
' Fax(516)765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
OFF CE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC ACCESS TO RECORDS
INSTRUCTIONS: Please complete Section I of this form and give to Town Clerk's
Office (agency Freedom of Information Officer) . One copy will be returned to you
in response to your request, o;r as an interim response.
SECTION 1.
TO:
(Department or Officer, if Known, that has the information you are requesting.)'
RECORD YOU WISH TO INSPECT: (Describe the record sought. If possible, supply
date, file title, tax map number, and any other pertinent information.)
Signature of Applicant:
Printed Name: PAf1& 11 1'%i
Address:
Mailing Address (if different
_Telephone Number:
[ ] APPROVED
[ ] APPROVED WITH DELA
n above) :
Date:
[ ] DENIED*
f�9 AY 2 i 1995
r-nzavetn n. _ wevmt: Date
Fr'eednm of Information Officer [own Clerk suuinoia /
* If delayed or denied see reverse side for explanation.
La"INING BOARD MEMBER,~
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR.
Chairman
WILLIAM J. CREMERS
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR.
RICHARD G. WARD
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
TO: Zoning Board of Appeals
FROM: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer
RE: Riverhead Building and Supply
Main Road, Greenport
SCTM# 1000-45-1-1
DATE: April 1, 1998
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-3136
Telephone (516) 765-1938
I! ` APR Z JAB
The Planning Board has reviewed the above application with the
applicant's agent and has reached agreement to move the building ten feet
to the south and add ten feet of landscaping to the front yard landscaped
area.
In addition, the applicant's agent has agreed to place an evergreen
landscaped hedge across the entire length of the north parking row to
screen the cars from view.
The Board feels that with these changes they can proceed with the
processing of this application.
7 PLANNING BOARD MEMBER
nd OFF04
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR.
Chairman
WILLIAM J. CREMERS
k KENNETH L. EDWARDS
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR.
RICHARD G. WARD
Jr ��
TO: Gerard P. Goehringer
FROM: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer -k
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
RE: Request for comments:
T. Petikas
Riverhead Building & Supply
M. Rosen Radio Tower
Nextel Communications
GMAC/ Former Empire Service Station
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-3136
Telephone (516) 765-1938
MAY
T. Petikas
Recommend that Suffolk County Department ofPublic Works be
notified as we understand that road work is planned for Route
48.
Riverhead Building & Supply
. See attached memo dated April 1, 1998.
Rosen Radio Tower
Board feels that Town Code Article XVI, 100-160, Wireless
Communication Facilities applies to this use.
Nextel Communications
. Board favors this collocation of antenna.
AMAC/former Empire Service Station
. See attached memo dated March 10, 1998
Attachments
PLANNING BOARD
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR.
Chairman
WILLIAM J. CREMERS
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM- JR.
RICHARD G. WARD
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
TO: Zoning Board of Appeals
FROM: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer
RE: Riverhead Building and Supply
Main Road, Greenport
SCTM# 1000-45-1-1
DATE: April 1, 1998
_. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-3136
Telephone (516) 765-1938
MAY I.3
The Planning Board has reviewed the above application with the
applicant's agent and has reached agreement to move the building ten feet
to the south and. add ten feet of landscaping to the front yard landscaped
area.
In addition, the applicant's agent has agreed to place an evergreen
landscaped hedge across the entire length of the north parking row to
screen the cars from view.
The Board feels that with these changes they can proceed with the
processing of this application.
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
MAY 1 3
TO: Zoning Board of Appeals
FROM: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer
RE: Request for .comments
Empire Service Station
° Main Road, Laurel
SCTM# 1000-122-7-1
DATE: March 10, 1998
This will update our memo to you of December 29, 1997, on -the above
request for a variance.
The applicant has, of this date, not submitted a site plan application as
requested by this Board. for the proposed canopy. Instead, we have
received a waiver request which this Board has denied.
The attached papers show:
1. A preliminary site plan was submitted to the Planning Board on
12-29-86.
2. A variance was granted for the convenience store on April 23,
1987, with findings that a site plan application was presently
before the Planning Board. (The Planning Board had only a
preliminary plan, not an application and fee) .
3. The Planning Board coordinated this preliminary site plan with
the New York State Department of Transportation, and received
recommendations for curbing and eight other safety items. This
DOT requirement was sent to the applicant for compliance.
4. The applicant did not continue with the site plan.
Wo
1
5. The Building Department received a letter from the DOT on
February 28, 1995, requesting that a Certificate of
Occupancy not be issued for the Convenience Store until the
DOT recommended safety improvements were made.
6. On February 13, 1998, the Planning Board received a waiver
request for a proposed canopy.
7. On February 18, 1998, the Planning Board sent a letter to the
applicants agent denying the waiver request because the intensity
of use at the site had been increased by the convenience store
thus requiring site plan review.
6. In its February 18, 1998, letter, this Board .requested that the
applicant continue with the site plan application and DOT
safety improvements.
7. As previously mentioned, to date the Board has not received the
requested site plan.
cc: Edward Forester, Director of code Enforcement
Laury Dowd, Town Attorney
Garrett Strang, R.A. MAy 1: 3'-
D
Tel. (516) 727-3947
ALLEN M. SMITH
Attorney and (Counselor at Law
737 Roanoke Avenue, P.O. ]fox 1240
Riverhead, New York 11901
March 23, 1998
Zoning Board of Appeals
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Robert G. Kassner, P.E.
Site Plan Reviewer
Town of Southold
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Riverhead Building Supply Corp. - Greenport
Ladies and Gentlemen:
]Fax: (516) 727-3950
� Q3/
fill
I note Mr. Kassner's memorandum dated March 13, 1998.
Please accept the following in support of the same.
My client has conducted a review of the business conducted
at the Greenport location during 1997. During 1997, Greenport
averaged 102± counter tickets per day. The high during the summer was
125± and the low in the winter was 70±.
Again, the Greenport location is and will remain a
lumberyard whose principal function will be the delivery of lumber
products to job sites.
The actual counts experienced by Riverhead Building Supply
at Greenport are consistent with estimated counts predicated by the
Institute of Transportation Engineers. The appropriate standard is
that for a Building Materials and Lumber Store (812 of the Trip
Generation Manual 6th Edition). These standards are gauged on the
number of employees and/or the sales floor area.
The Greenport yard has 15 employees. The standard calls
out.an average of 200 vehicle trips per day (200 entering and 200
exiting).
The gross floor area of the proposed sales area for the
Greenport yard is 7,350± square feet. This standard calls out an
average of 150 vehicle trips per day (150 entering and 150 exiting).
Zoning Board of Appeals
Robert G. Kassner, P.E.
March 23, 1998
Page Two
Should you require any further or different information,
please contact me.
Very truly yours,
QQ2"-
Allen M. Smith
AMS: ked
cc: Mr. Edgar Goodale
Mr. Jessie R. Goodale, III
ALLEN M. SMITH
Attorney and Counselor at Law
737 Roanoke Avenue, P.O. ]Box 1240
Tel. (516) 727-3947 Riverhead, New York 11901 Fax: (16) 727-3950
March 23, 1998
Zoning Board of Appeals
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Robert G. Kassner, P.E.
Site Plan Reviewer.
Town of Southold
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Riverhead Building Supply Corp..- Greenport
Ladies and Gentlemen:
I note Mr. Kassner's memorandum dated March 13, 1998.
Please accept the following in support of the same.
My client has conducted a review of the business conducted
at the Greenport location during 1997. During 1997, Greenport
averaged 102± counter tickets per day. The high during the summer was
125± and the low in the winter was 70±.
Again, the Greenport location is and will remain a
lumberyard whose principal function will be the delivery of lumber
products to job sites.
The actual counts experienced by Riverhead Building Supply
at Greenport are consistent with estimated counts predicated by the
Institute of Transportation Engineers. The appropriate standard is
that for a Building Materials and Lumber Store (812 of the Trip
Generation Manual 6th Edition). These standards are gauged on the
number of employees and/or the sales floor area.
The Greenport yard has 15 employees. The standard calls
out an average of 200 vehicle trips per day (200 entering and 200
exiting).
. The gross floor area of the proposed sales area for. the
Greenport yard is 7,350± square feet. This standard calls out an
average of 150 vehicle trips per day (150 entering and 150 exiting).
Zoning Board of Appeals
Robert G. Kassner, P.E.
March 23, 1998
Page Two
Should you require any further or different information,
please contact me.
Very truly yours,
Allen M. Smith
AMS: ked
cc: Mr. Edgar Goodale
Mr. Jessie R. Goodale, III
ALLEN M. SMITH
H[
Attorney and Counselor at Law
737 Roanoke Avenue, P.O. Box 1240
Tel: (516) 727-3947 Riverhead.. New.York 11901 'Fax: (516) 727-3950
March 23, 1998
Zoning Board of Appeals
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Robert G. Kassner, P.E.
Site Plan Reviewer
Town of Southold
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Riverhead Building Supply Corp. - Greenport
Ladies and Gentlemen:
I note Mr. Kassner's memorandum dated March 13,.1998.
Please accept the following in support of the same.
My client has conducted a review of the business conducted
at the Greenport location during -1997. During 1997, Greenport
averaged 102± counter tickets per day. The high during -the summer was
125± and the low in the winter was 70±.
Again, the Greenport location is and.will remain a
lumberyard whose principal function will be the delivery of lumber
products to job sites.
The actual counts experienced by Riverhead Building Supply
at Greenport are consistent with estimated counts predicated by the
Institute of Transportation Engineers. The appropriate standard is
that for a Building Materials and Lumber Store (812 of the Trip
Generation Manual 6th Edition). These standards are gauged on the
number of employees and/or the 3ale3 floor area.
The Greenport yard has 15 employees. The standard calls
out an average of 200 vehicle trips per day (200 entering and 200
exiting).
The gross floor area of the proposed sales area for the
Greenport yard is 7,350± square feet. This standard calls out an'
average of 150 vehicle trips per day (150 entering and 150 exiting).
Zoning Board of Appeals
Robert G. Kassner, P.E.
March 23, 1998
Page Two
Should you require any further or different information,
please contact me.
Very truly yours,
t
Allen M. Smith
AMS: ked
cc: Mr. Edgar Goodale
Mr. Jessie R. Goodale, III
r
ALLEN -M. SA 1L H
Attorney and Counselor at Law
737 Roanoke Avenue, P.O. Box 1240
Tel: (516) 727-394.7 Riverhead, New York 1,1901 Fax: (516) 727-3950
March 23, 1998
Zoning Board of Appeals
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Robert G. Kassner, P.E.
Site Plan Reviewer
Town of Southold
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Riverhead Building Supply Corp. - Greenport
Ladies and Gentlemen:
I note Mr. Kassner's memorandum dated March 13, 1998.
Please accept the following in support of the same."
My client has conducted a review, of the business conducted
at the Greenport location during 1997. During 1997, Greenport
averaged 102± counter tickets per day. The high during the summer was
125± and the low in the winter was 70±..
Again, the Greenport location is and.will remain a
lumberyard whose principal function will be the delivery of lumber
products to job sites.
The actual counts experienced by Riverhead Building Supply
at Greenport are consistent with estimated counts predicated by the
Institute of Transportation Engineers. The appropriate standard is
that for a Building Materials and Lumber Store (812 of the Trip
Generation Manual 6th Edition). These standards are gauged on the
number of employees and/or the sales floor area.
The Greenport yard has 15 employees. The standard calls
outan average of 200 vehicle trips per day (200 entering and 200
exiting).
The gross floor area of the proposed sales area for the
Greenport yard is 7,350± square feet. This standard calls out an
average of 150 vehicle trips per day (150 entering and 150 exiting).
Zoning Board of Appeals
Robert G. Kassner, P.E.
March 23, 1998
Page Two
Should you require any further or different information,
please contact me.
Very truly yours,
Q �
Allen M. Smith_..
AMS: ked
cc: Mr. Edgar Goodale
Mr. Jessie R. Goodale, III
PLANNING BOARD MEMBEf, ,
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR.
1
I/N Chirman
WILLIAM J. CREMERS
II KENNETH L. EDWARDS
t�GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR.
RICHARD G. WARD
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
TO: Zoning Board of Appeals {�
FROM: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer fJ`
RE: Request for comments
Riverhead Building and Supply
Main Road, Greenport
SCTM# 1000-46-1-2.1
DATE: March 17, 1998
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-3136
Telephone (516) 765-1938
This will supplement our memo of March 13, 1998, commenting on the
above project.
The Board has advised the applicant to move the building ten feet to the
south and relocate the front row of parking. This will allow for increased
u
front yard landscaping.
The Board feels that the relocation of the parking, increased setback and
additional landscaping will ameliorate the width of the building.
,O1
ii
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD 0/u
AUGUST 8, 1995
5:05 P.M.
IN THE MATTER OF A PROPOSED "LOCAL LAW IN RELATION TO FRONT
YARD SETBACKS".
Present: Supervisor Thomas H. Wickham
Councilman Joseph
J.
Lizewski
Councilwoman Alice
J.
Hussie
Councilwoman Ruth
D.
Oliva
Councilman Joseph
L.
Townsend, Jr.
Justice Louisa P. Evans
Town Clerk Judith
T.
Terry
Town Attorney Laury
L. Dowd
SUPERVISOR WICKHAM: We'll go on to the next hearing.
COUNCILWOMAN OLIVA: "Public Notice is Hereby Given that there has been
presented to the Town Board of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New
York, on the 27th day of June, 1995, a Local Law entitled, "A Local Law
in Relation to Front Setbacks". Notice is further given that the Town Board
of the Town of Southold will hold a public hearing on the aforesaid Local
Law at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, on
the 8th day of August, 1995, at 5:05 P.M., at which time all interested
persons will be heard. This proposed "Local Law in Relation to Front Yard
Setbacks" reads as follows:
BE IT ENACTED, by the Town Board of the Town of Southold as follows:
Chapter 100 (Zoning) of the Code of the Town of Southold is hereby amended
as follows:
1. Section 100-83 (Frontyard Setbacks) is hereby added as follows:
(a) Structures shall be set back at least one hundred (100) feet from the
right-of-way.
(b) There shall be an exception to (a) if the adjacent parcels are
developed, in which case the minimum frontward setback shall be
the average of the setbacks of the adiacent parcels.
u A proiect shall be divided into separate structures so that no single
structure shall have more than sixty (60) linear feet of frontage on
one street. The setbacks of multiple structures on a parcel may
vary, provided that the average setback of the structures meets the
setback required above and all buildinas are at least seventv-five
75) feet from the rig ht-of-wa ..
pg 2 P. H.
Section 100-103 (Frontyard Setbacks) is hereby added as follows:
(a) Structures shall be set back at least one hundred (100) feet from the
right-of-way.
(b) There shall be an exception to (a) if the adjacent parcels are
developed, in which case the minimum frontward setback shall be
the average of the setbacks of the adjacent parcels_
LO A proiect shall be divided into separate structures so that no single
structure shall have more than sixth (60) linear feet of frontage on
one street. The setbacks of multiple structures on a parcel may
vary, provided that the average setback of the structures meets (lie
setback required above and all buildings are at least seventy-five_
L75) feet from the right -of -waw
Section 100-143 (Frontyard Setbacks) is hereby added as follows:
(aj Structures shall beset back at least one hundred (100) feet from the
right-of-way.
(b) There shall be an exception to a) if the adjacent parcels are
.developed, in which case the minimum frontward setback shall be
the average of the setbacks of the adjacent parcels.
M A proiect shall be divided into separate structures so that no single
structure shall have more than sixty (60) linear feet of frontage on
one street. The setbacks of multiple structures on a parcel may
vary, provided that the average setback of the structures meets the
setback required above and all buildings are at least seventy-five
(75) feet from the right-of-way.
Section 100-133 (Frontyard Setbacks) is: hereby added as follows:
(a1 Structures shall beset back at least one hundred_ (100) feet from the
right-of-way. -
(W There shall be an exception to (a) if the adjacent parcels are
developed, in which case the minimum frontward setback shall be
the average of the setbacks of the adjacent parcels
pg 3 P.H.
(c) A Proiect shall be divided into separate structures so that no single
structure shall have more than sixty (60) linear feet of frontage on
one street. The setbacks of multiple structures on a parcel may
vary, provided that the average setback of the structures meets the
setback required above and all buildings are at least seventy-five
(75) feet from the right-of-way.
5, Bulk Schedule for Business, Office and Industrial Districts is hereby
amended as shown on attached page.
f�
Mhdmimi mp-llen,ew s rat basl"ess, onlce,
I1;,sl,hd nt allies naatesldenllnl use'
IA %lie Isqume feel)
1.01 011111 (reel)
IM del -111 fficn
rood )pill (rcell
sille ynwl Ircrl)
ntnl, side yntds (rccl)
Item 1.1,111 (reel)
I.nndscnl,e men 11estenll
Mnslnn1,w pet11dlled 111111e11f1011e
Ltd cmemge (peleeld)
IIw1111ing belgbl (reel)
Nuwd,cl nr sinl les
I'M I l;s*
Town of Sotdholrl
Bulk Schedule for Business, Office will Induslllnl L)Inlrlcls
' Fn, minlnn1,n tegwltemenss rot raidenllnl uses, serer ntsl to Density and Allnlunun L.a1 She Scliednle rot Ilmoesldenllnl DIWICls end Ihen 10 npplopllele )ndlcnled Column
III II1e 11111k SCIlethile rat nesideatinl Ura. In the Mnrltie I still Meslne 11 Illsoltls, "Illy lend Chore mean Illph welet d,nll gonllry rot sten eelcalndont
tlerct In npptnpdele nine Ordlnence.
II. This Local Law shall take effect upon its filing with the Secretary of
State.
* Underline represents additions.
** Strikethrough represents deletions.
Copies of this Local Law are available in the Office of the Town Clerk to any
interested persons during business hours. Dated: July. 25, 1995. Judith T.
Terry, Southold Town Clerk." We have some correspondence. Pursuant to
the requirements of Sections A '14-14 to 23 of the Suffolk County
Administration Code, the above referenced application which has been
submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is considered to be a
matter for local determination as there is no apparent significant
county -wide or inter -community _impacts. A decision of local determination
should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Very truly
yours, Stephen M. Jones, Director of" Planning. We, also, have an affidavit
that it has been published in The Suffolk Times, and an affidavit from Judith
I,I0
Ln
Ili
11
LI6h11ndnsltlnl
1.1
Llmhed
Ilemlel
rlrnunl
M.I
M•11
RnliTinmed
LIEN
nnslness
nuslness
Ih,slume
hindne 1
bintb,e It
Orrice Palk
Indwsltlnl
oil (010
2110011
)0,11110
•1(1,00(1
A011011
I lfl,lmll
.M 111WI
115
ill
1111
Illi
1311
)1111
IIN1
2511
11111
Ili
130
Ili
lilt
150
At ynllnllla'
I l
a11 v"Ilnblc'
Ss
31
IS
ynll"bh'
20
111
23
Hl
23
to
)n
113
2 5
50
113
w
6t)
III
)5
25
l3
15
25
73
M
35
7.1
.1.1
IS
711
1.1
71
20
.111
)1)
JIl
311
I0
111
35
35
35
33
35
.15
.13
2'1/,
2
7
2
1
7
2
' Fn, minlnn1,n tegwltemenss rot raidenllnl uses, serer ntsl to Density and Allnlunun L.a1 She Scliednle rot Ilmoesldenllnl DIWICls end Ihen 10 npplopllele )ndlcnled Column
III II1e 11111k SCIlethile rat nesideatinl Ura. In the Mnrltie I still Meslne 11 Illsoltls, "Illy lend Chore mean Illph welet d,nll gonllry rot sten eelcalndont
tlerct In npptnpdele nine Ordlnence.
II. This Local Law shall take effect upon its filing with the Secretary of
State.
* Underline represents additions.
** Strikethrough represents deletions.
Copies of this Local Law are available in the Office of the Town Clerk to any
interested persons during business hours. Dated: July. 25, 1995. Judith T.
Terry, Southold Town Clerk." We have some correspondence. Pursuant to
the requirements of Sections A '14-14 to 23 of the Suffolk County
Administration Code, the above referenced application which has been
submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is considered to be a
matter for local determination as there is no apparent significant
county -wide or inter -community _impacts. A decision of local determination
should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Very truly
yours, Stephen M. Jones, Director of" Planning. We, also, have an affidavit
that it has been published in The Suffolk Times, and an affidavit from Judith
pg 4 P. H.
T. Terry, that it has been placed on the Town Clerk's Bulletin Board. We
also have one other communication from the Chairman of the Planning Board,
which reads as follows: Dear Mrs. Terry, At it's July 10, 1995 meeting, the
Planning Board adopted the following report. The Planning Board has
reviewed the proposed amendment to the Zoning Code pertaining to front yard
setbacks in Limited Business (LB), General Business (B) and Light Industrial
Office (LIO) and Light Industrial (LI). The Board supports this proposed
local law because it will help soften the visual impact of development
alongside the main roads, will prevent the construction of strip -type retail
structures, and will help maintain the rural character of our Town.
Sincerely, Richard G. Ward, Chairman. There are no further communications.
SUPERVISOR WICKHAM: Would anyone like to address the Board on this
public hearing? (No response.) I might very briefly preface these comments
by saying that this legislation is pursuant to a policy resolution, that the
Board adopted over a year .ago, pledging to keep open the character of Route
48, and the other major roads in town to avoid a strip development
appearance, and to keep the visual distance that are currently available for
people driving through. Also, to keep Route 48 as an express road without a
lot of traffic congestion. Anyone like to address the Board on this proposed
Local Law? (No response.) If not; I declare the hearing closed.
Judith T. Terry
Southold Town Clerk
PLANNINiG BOARD MEMBEV,5- �oSUFF01/(
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. �o G
Chairman O �1
WILLIAM J. CREMERS cc 2
KENNETH L. EDWARDS �y • ��
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR.
RICHARD G. WARD
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
TO: Zoning Board of Appeals
FROM: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer
RE: Request for comments
Riverhead Building and Supply
Main Road, Greenport
SCTM# 1000-46-1-2.1
DATE: March 13, 1998
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-3136
Telephone (516) 765-1938
This is in response to your memo of March 4, 1998, requesting comments
on the width of the above building, eight foot high fence and traffic
v;
concerns.
The Board does not have concerns with the eight foot fence as it is
located 185' south of the property line and Route 25.
The Board feels that this type of enclosed lumber warehouse is unique in
design and requires this size (width) building.
The Long Environmental Assessment Form, LEAF, was originally submitted
with the Change of Zone Request sent to the Town Board and reviewed
'i by the Town's Consultant, (report attached) .
-r, In discussing the traffic considerations with our consultant, it was felt
that the major customer traffic would be local, as there is a similar
building in Riverhead. The North Fork customer base would be split
between Riverhead and Southold (Greenport) . The Board does not
feel that the traffic to the Greenport location would increase
materially.
V Fi
IiEGISTitAR OF VITAL STATISTICS •
MARRIAGE OFFICER
RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SEQR ;
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Towh-Haiif-V 096 Main
Southold, New Yolk 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
Notice of Determination of Non -Significance
Lead Agency: Town of Southold
Town Board
Address: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Date: October 15; 1996
D
OCT 2 3 1996
This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617, of the implementing regulations pertaining
to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental Conservation Law.
The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not
have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact
Statement need not be prepared.
Title of Action: Riverhead Building Supply Corp.
Change of Zone
SCTM: 1000-046-01-2.1
SEQR Status: Unlisted Action
Project Description: The subject application involves a change of zone
from Hamlet Density (HD) to Light Industrial/Planned
Office Park (LIO).
Location: The 3.5 acre subject site is located on the south side of
NYS Route 25 (Main Road), approximately 170 feet west
of Moore's Lane In the hamlet of Greenport.
Reasons Supporting This Determination:
This determination is issued in full consideration of the Criteria for Determination of
Significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.7, the Long Environmental Assessment Form
Parts I,11 and the following specific reasons:
M
Reasons Supporting This Determination:
This project involves the construction of a 50,425 square foot lumber yard supply
building. A variance application is before the Board of Appeals for building
width. The building width must be approved by the Board of Appeals before site
plan approval. A full environmental impact statement was reviewed by the
town's consultant in conjunction with the zone change application to the Town
Board. A lumber yard supply building is a permitted use in this Light Industrial
Park/Planned Office Park (LIO), thus the proposed action is consistent with
zoning.
An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed,
and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the
environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented
as planned.
There has not been any correspondence received from the New York State
Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time.
Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections
from that agency.
The applicant will have to comply with the requirements of the Suffolk
County Sanitary Code (SCSC) and all relevant standards of water supply
and sewage disposal systems. Design and flow specification, subsurface
soil conditions and site plan details will have to be approved by the Suffolk
County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). This impact is not
considered significant due to the anticipated project compliance with
established requirements of the SCSC and the SCDHS and the required
relevant permits.
For Further Information:
Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner
Address: Planning Board
Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938
cc: John P. Cahill, DEC Albany
Suffolk County Dept. of Health
Suffolk County Water Authority
New York State Dept. of Transportation
Judith Terry, Town Clerk
Suffolk County Dept. of Public Works
Southold Town Building Dept.
Applicant
.� x --e 'C�+'.� , r-rr-'•� n--o-'r--.�4-A..m- t
�, ;�zt:r:r•--°l;� =`'t' .y' .,,� ''r.. , ,.�-\,+� Vii. ,n , �'�; �=r, t, ..ir�': T
g r.r., - ?7:�`?:p'"r .};r, ', .S'• :�': i;}5,..,, ','s'.': fir... .„'... }•.���'�' .). ^Y` - .:r=r, .ri �
of Southold Planning Board reviewed the subject application and recommended a negative
declaration for the change of zone for the following reasons: surrounding properties are mostly
commercial, the nature of the use will not require large volumes of water nor generate large volumes of
wastewater; and the change of zone to LIO is in keeping; th the commercial 7-11 store to the north and
LIO zone to the west.
2. Through inspection and consultation of environmental references it has been determined that the site
does not contain sensitive environmental resources.
3. The proposed action will not set significant precedent, as' it represents a unique scenario.
4. The size and location of the subject site makes it less desirable PID residential uses, in consideration of
adjacent land uses (including. the Riverhead Building Supply facility to the west, 7-11 convenience store
to the north and the LIRR tracks to the south) and in view of the inability to provide adequate on-site
buffers.
5. The existing Riverhead Building Supply facility is considered to be pre-existing and non -conforming with
respect to building setbacks. Approximately 330 linear feet of existing structures on the existing
Riverhead Building Supply property are within 5 feet of the common property line with the subject site.
The current Town of Southold Zoning Code requires a minimum side yard setback of 30 feet in the LIO
I zoning district, 25 feet of which must be landscaped when adjacent to parcels zoned HD. If residential
development on the subject site were to occur it may be adversely impacted by the lack of adequate
buffering on the adjacent site to the west.
6. The proposed action would permit the expansion of the existing building materials storage and sales use
and would allow for the better design of the facility, with side yard buffers from adjacent residential sites
to the east, allowing for a more appropriate transitional zone.
7. In consideration of site characteristics and surrounding land uses, LIO zoning would permit the highest
and best use of the subject site.
8. Although the action was not specifically recommended in recent master plan updates, the action appears
consistent with Town comprehensive planning in consideration of site specific issues.
9. The proposed action is for a change of zone and further review under the Planning Board site plan
review process will be necessary prior to development of the subject site. At that time, various aspects of
the project may be addressed including buffered setbacks, site layout, and locations of sanitary and
stormwater structures.
10. Proposed project is not of significant magnitude or impact to warrant the preparation of a Draft EIS, and
will not cause a significant burden on natural or community resources.
For Further Information:
Contact Person: Judith Terry, Town Clerk
Town of Southold Clerk's Office
53095 Main Road, P.O, Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
e (516) 165-1800
Copies of this Notice Sent to:
Commissioner -Department of Environmental Conservation
Regional Office -New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation
Southold Town Planning Board A-'
Southold Town Clerk's Bulletin Board
Suffolk County Department of Health Services
Suffolk County Department of Planning
NYS Legislative Commission on Water Resource Needs of Long Island
Riverhead Building Supply Corp.
KENNETH L. EDWARDS _,.
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR.
RICHARD G. WARD
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -
State Environmental Quality Review
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Notice of Determination Non -Significant
Telephone (516) 765-1938
August 11, 1997
This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations
pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality: Review Act) of the
Environmental Law.
The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the
proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the
environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared.
Name of Action: Proposed site plan for Riverhead Building Supply
SCTM#: 1000-46-1-2.1
Location: ' Main Rd., Greenport
SEAR Status: Type I ( )
Unlisted (-X)
- Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( )
No (X)
Description of Action:
This, proposed site plan is for the construction of a 50,425 square foot lumber
yard supply building.
'.. W
STATE OF NEW YORK
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE OFFICE BUILDING
250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY
HAUPPAUGE, N.Y_ 11788-5518
CRAIG 3IRAl:I15A, P.E.
ACTING REGIONAL DIRECTOR
August 13, 1997
Nir. Robert G. Kassner
Southold Planning Board
Town Ilall -
53095 Nlain Road
P.O. Box 1 179
Southold, New York 11971
Riverhead Building Sunnly
Route 25
Greenport
Dcar Mr. Kassncr:
JOSEPt1 H. BOARDMAN
COMMISSIONER
We have reviewed the Environmental Assessment F'orm lin' the referenced proposed reconstruction.
We concur that the Southold Planning Board should assume SE -QR lead agency status.
The State has no construction projects scheduled in this location in our five year planning program.
F'or highway work permit information, please have the developer contact V. Lcna at 952-6020. For other
information you may contact G. l3cierling at 952-6128.
"Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal.
Very truly yours,
Nf1CIlAl?1_ AZER
Planning & Program Management
,
Li LJ AUG 1 91991
ye -
' - ._-_. yl sem. 1—... •, • - .d :4 I:ti \ � I'
' - ,`'• �,_. ___..�-_.--. e...- "`, i, a ii
.. '� � � MAR "•.� �_-.�� , ; ' , . , .. .
March 5, 1998
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman -
Zoning Board Of Appeals.. Town Of Southold
Town Hall, P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York' 11971
Re: 74610 &745.00 Mairi Road (Route 25) _ _
Greenport;. New York .11944
SCTM# 10.0.0-46-01-01 &'2.11
Owner: The Riverhead Building, Supply.-Corp. ;
Subject: ,Application dated October 22, 1997,
for Pdmit to Construct A' Building.Supply Facility
Dear Mr. Chairman:'
This letter, is written in direct. response to a front page'article entitled DRIVE THROUGH
PLANNED in the March 4, 1998 issue of,NORTH,FORK'SUFFOLK LIFE: (see,exhibit
#1).
As u director and on •behalf of the members of THE PHEASANT RUN HOME
OWNERS ASSOCIATION, I submit for.your review several of our major concerns,
relative-to the,captiolied application.,
First let me state, we have been.monitoring subject -application since it's inception.
Please refer to NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL dated January 2, .1998 TOWN OF
SOUTHOLD,-'BUILDING DEPARTMENT. (see exhibit #2)
PHEASANT RUN CONDON 41UMS are located on Moore's Lane in Greenport. This
road has become a'heavily,traveled corridor connectirig County Road 4.8 to Route 25;''� .
Moore's Lane currently services 'coimnercial vehicles, passenger cars and pedestrian
traffic: We feel 'corifident the you and THE DOT share our concern'over the,negative
impact that a 50,000 square commercial "DRIVE THROUGH FACILITY"' would create.
'Peconic Properties,. P.O. Box 1143,. Cutchogue, New York 11935
.-:Tel: (516).477-8840
To encourage increased consumer,traffic iii this -region;•Where there are already ekisting
businesses.- near by Public School and various tourism�attractions and'events sends-a
clear message: of CAUTION.'
Additional concerns include those of an" environmental' nature. The magnitude and
design of a warehouse (see exhibit 93) of the proposed project within 300 fe_ et of Tidal
Wetlands 'is, a °"RED FLAG
Public Officials and residents. of the'area MUST remain dedicated t_o the, preservation-of of, .
the scenic_ parklike concept. as a GATEWAY TO_ GR ,ENPORT.' ;
We are recommending that the. Board Of Appeals and Southold Planning Board'reject _
this application , „ ;
Thank you -for'your.time.
` Sincerely;, ' -' ,., ,. -' , ' , - \ , .- , •'- _ ,{" ' , . _ .
.Lynda Lee 'Spangel" : _. . ' _ •, ..
Pheasant Run Home Owners Association
Member Board: Of Directors
.cc: Southold Town Planning Board .
Pheasant Run"Hoine Owners.
•, - - - •, - ,.. - _ _ "; V• ,..- {• � 14 � . ' 1, ..
,,(
:'f •{
,.l � '� , '.r
%,•f' �`
-
- - .�� _ r
- 1.
Ir -°�,
'-
. ,-Peconic'Pr6pertik P.O. Box 1.143, ;Cutchogue, N6w;Y6rk,1'1935. -
Tel: (516)477-8840
PATRICIA C. MOORE
Attomey at Law
315 Westphalia Road
w
P.O. Box 483
return this
Mattituck, New York 11952
1 . H
■ Print your name and address on the reverse of this so we
can
Tel: (516) 298-5629
j
Fax: (516) 298-5664
�A�n 22
�?
d
0!
March 19, 1998
Southold Town
Board of Appeals
53095 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Att: Ms. Linda Kowalski
RE: Riverhead Building Supply Corp. Application
Hearing Date: March 23, 1998
Dear Linda:
Enclosed please find two (2) additional return receipt cards
for the Affidavit of Mailing for the above referenced matter.
Very truly yours,
Patricia C. Moore
By: Margaret Rutkowski,
,,..r..L
` d SENDER:
• o ■ Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services.
I also wish to receive the
w
■Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b.
form that
return this
following services (for an
1 . H
■ Print your name and address on the reverse of this so we
can
extra fee):
j
card to you.
■Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not
1. ❑ Addressee's Address
�?
d
ermit.
■ rite'Retum Receipt Requested' on the mailpiece below the article number.
d
2. ❑ Restricted Delivery N
5
1 !C
■ e Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date
i elivered.
.-
Consult postmaster for fee.
a
3 Article Addressed to:
4a. Article Number 0
Z 306 461 219 C
I,', E
Colgate Design Corp.
4b. Service Type
};-�
c/o Southland Corp.
❑ Registered. CN Certified °C
Att Ad Valorem Tax
❑ Express Mail ❑ • Insured S
¢
P.O-:: Box 711
❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD 0
c
Dallas, TX 75221-9867
7. Date of Delivery
ZOR
131S98
5. Recei a By: (Print N e)
B. Addressee's Address (Only if requested
W
and fee is paid)
ix
g
6. Sig to ddre ee o n
!, o
i f�
PS Fohn 3811, December 1994 102595-97-B-0179 Domestic Return Receipt
PATRICIA C. MOORE
Attorney at Law
315 W estphaliaRoaci
P.O. Box 483
Mattituck, New York 11952
Southold Town
Board of Appeals
53095 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Att: Ms. Linda Kowalski
Dear Linda:
Tel: (516) 298-5629
Fax: (516) 298-5664
March 13, 1998
RE: Riverhead Building Supply Corp. Application
Hearing Date: March 23, 1998
Enclosed please find an additional return receipt card for the
Affidavit of Mailing for the above referenced matter.
Very truly yours,
;; SENDER: �ia C. Moore
v ■ Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. II
0) ■Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b. I also Wish to receive the
H ■ Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this following services (for an
d card to you, extra fee):
■A" h h'
>
ac tis form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not
permit. 1. ❑ Addressee's Address
°
ai
■Write'Refurn Receipt Requested' on the mailpiece below the article number.
■The etum Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date 2 11 Restricted Delivery
deli
y
c
°
ered.
3. A icle Addressed to:
Consult postmaster for fee.
a
4a. Article Number
d
riftwood Cove Co. Owners
Inc. Z 306 461 218
c
cE
c/(j, Lewis Edson
4b. Service Type
5
U,
P • Q :- Box 1526
❑ Registered Certified
1]
occ
Southold, NY 11971
ElExpress Mail ElInsured
c I
G
❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD
a
z
7. Date of Delivery
o`
�
LU
5. Received By: (Print Name)
�OVTHO�
8. Addressee' Add ess (Only ifNque
ed
and fee is aid)
c
6. SXIr �ddresse or n
MAR 12 1990
�
PS Form 3811, December 1994
102595-97-e-0179 me. ' - P rn 0 -- —4-
L. 1
BOARD OF APPEALS:TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
-----------------------------------x
In the Matter of the Application
of
Riverhead Building Supply Corp.
(Name of Applicants)
------------------------------------
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)
STATE OF NEW YORK)
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING AND POSTING
I, Margaret Rutkowski, residing at Mattituck, NY
New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that:
1) On the 10th day of March , 199 8 , I personally mailed,
by certified mail, return receipt requested, a true copy of the
attached Legal Notice, addressed to. each of the following named
persons at' the addresses set opposite their respective names, that
the addresses listed below are those shown on the current assess-
ment rolls of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at ;
the United States Post Office to each name below certified' mail,
return receipt requested attach post office receipts here) :
Name of Surrounding Property Owner Mailing Address
Thomas Jurzenia & wf 675 Silvermere Road, Greenport, NY 11944
New York Telephone Co. 38th Fl., 1095 Avenue of the Americas, NY, NY 10036
Philip & Patricia Marcario 2878 N. Wading River Rd., Wading River, NY 11792
Driftwood Cove Co. Owners Inc. c/o Lewis Edson P.O. Box 1526, Southoold, NY 11971 .
Robert Brown P.O. Box 2050, Greenport, NY 11944
Colgate Design Corp. c/o Southland Corp., P.O. Box 711, Dallas, TX 75221-9867
Anne Marie Nelson c/o Bank of NY Trust Co., 701 Brickell Ave., 11th F1:, Miami, FL
33131
and,
2) On the day of I personally posted the
subject property identified as District 1000, Section ,
Block , Lot by placing the Town's official poster
ten (10) feet, or closer, from the property line facing the street or
facing the right-of-way, and that I have checked to be sure the
poster has remained in place for seven full days prior to the subject
hearing date, which is _
J'�G��er � •
Sworn to before me this (signature)
12t of -March, .1998
PATRICIA C. M 00RE
otary Public Nof Now York
Su olk CountyPubllNo 4961668
Commission Expires June 16, _L2.99
**Please return to the office of the Board of Appeals when ccmpleted.
(Town Hall hours are 8 - 4 p.m.) '.hank you.
I
BOARD OF APPEALS:TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
-----------------------------------x
In the Matter of the Application
of AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
Riverhead Building Supply Corp.
(Name of Applicants)
------------------------------------
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)
STATE OF NEW YORK)
I, Patricia C. Moore , residing at Southold, NY
New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that:
1) On the day of , 199 I personally mailed,
by certified mail, return receipt requested, a true copy of the,
attached Legal Notice, addressed to each of the following named
persons at' the addresses set opposite their respective names, that
the addresses listed below are those shown on the current assess-
ment rolls of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at
the United States Post Office to each name below certified mail,
return receipt requested (attach post office receipts here) :
Name of Surrounding Property Owner Mailing Address
and,
2) On the 10th day of March, _.199.8 I personally posted the
subject property identified as District 1000, Section 46 ,
Block 1 , Lot 1 & 2..001, by placing the Town's official poster
ten (10) feet, or closer, from the property line facing the street or
facing the right-of-way, and that I have checked to be sure the
poster has remained in place for seven full days prior to the subject
hearing date, which is March. 23,,, .1998 1______2.1 "In,
Sworn to before me this v (signature)
12th aay OL . March,. -I-998
MARGARETC. RUTKOYI;;KI
C . - Notary Public, State of Nobs Ynrlt
46�Public fVo.4982528
Qualified in Suffolk County
Commission Expires June 3,19 11
—Please return to the office of the Hoard of Appeals when ccmD_ leted. J
(Town Hall hours are 8 - 4 p.m.) Thank you. �
PATRICIA C. MOORE
Attorney at Law
315 Westphalia Road
P.O. Box 483
Mattituck, New York 11952
Tel: (516) 298-5629
Fax: (516) 298-5664
March 12, 1998
Southold Town
Board of Appeals
53095 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Att: Ms. Linda Kowalski
RE: Riverhead Building Supply Corp. Application
Hearing Date: March 23, 1998
Dear Linda:
Enclosed please find completed Affidavit of Mailing with
postmarked receipts from the post office and two of the return
receipt cards for the above referenced matter.
Also enclosed is the completed Affidavit of Posting for this
matter.
Vermy yours,
atricia C. Moore
PCM/mr
Encls.
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
James Dinizio, Jr.
Lydia A. Tortora
Lora S. Collins
George Horning
MEMORANDUM
BOIARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTfiOLD
TO: Planning Board
FROM: G. Goehringer, ZBA Chairman
DATE: March 4, 1998
SUBJECT: Riverhead Building Supply Project
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
ZBA Fax (516) 765-9064
Telephone (516) 765-1809
We have received inquiries with regard to Route 25 in the area of
the above project, Moore's Lane, 7-11, and other business/industrial
uses, and whether or not information was requested about the
frequency of trailer trucks entering, exiting, loading and unloading
as well as other vehicles. Attorney Patricia Moore, as agent for
the � applicant, furnished a copy of the SEQRA determination of
non -significance for this project today, and there is no indication
whether the traffic issues were addressed or requested by the
Planning Board as lead agency for consideration.
The Board of Appeals hearing regarding the building width and
fence height will be held on March, 23, 1998. We would like to
provide the Planning Board with an opportunity to furnish comments
to us under the site plan pending for a 115 ft:' wide building and
8 -ft. fence height. Also, please furnish reasons supporting your
comments (or site plan preference) with respect to these site
planning considerations, and with respect to the paragraph above.
\X� Thank you.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR.
j' Chairman
WILLIAM J. CREMERS
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR.
RICHARD G. WARD
cin Z
1
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF; SOUTHOLD
r �S; ate Environmental Quality Review
i'_ �ll NEGATIVE DECLARATION
V� Notice1of Determination Non -Significant
Au ustl1, 1997
Town Hall, 53095 Main I
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11!
Fak (516) 765-3136
Telephone (516) 765-19
This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations
pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the
Environmental Law.
The Southold Town Planning Board, as jead agency, has determined that the
proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the
environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared.
Name of Action: Proposed site plan for Riverhead Building Supply
SCTM#: 1000-46-1-2.1
Location: Main Rd., Greenport
SEAR Status: Type I ( )
Unlisted (X)
Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( )
No (X)
Description of Action:
This proposed site plan is for the construction of a 50,425 square foot lumber
yard supply building.
s
'` 4/
"J e PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR.
Chairman
WILLIAM J. CREMERS
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR.
RICHARD G. WARD
August 12, 1997
Patricia Moore, Esq.
P.O. Box 483
Mattituck, NY 11952
���SUFFO(,1=co
� Gy�
0
cn
O
1
z
�
pA-VDD OFFICE
TOyVIV F SOUTHOLD
z6� U
Re: Proposed site plan for Riverhead Building Supply
SCTM# 1000-46-1-2.1
Dear Ms. Moore:
Town Hall, 53095 Mair
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 1
Fax (516) 765-313
Telephone (516) 765 -
The following resolution, was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a
meeting held on Monday, August 11, 1997:
BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the
State Environmental Quality Review Act, establishes itself as lead agency, and
as lead agency makes a determination of non -significance, and grants a
Negative Declaration.
- Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records.
Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above.
Sincerely,
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
enc.
z 1.
Page 2
SEQR Negative Declaration -Riverhead Building Supply
August 11, 1997
Reasons Supporting This Determination:
This project involves the construction of a 50,425 square foot lumber yard supply
building. A variance application is before the Board of Appeals for building
width. The building width must be approved by the, Board of Appeals before site
plan approval. A full environmental impact statement was reviewed by the
town's consultant in conjunction with the zone change application to the Town
Board. A lumber yard supply building is a permitted use in this.Light Industrial
Park/Planned Office Park (LIO), thus the proposed action is consistent with
zoning.-
An
oning.An Environmental Assessment Form has !been submitted and reviewed,
and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the
environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented
as planned.
There has not been any correspondence received from the New York State
Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time.
Therefore, it is assumed that there are no. comments or objections
from that agency.
The applicant will have to comply with the requirements of the Suffolk
County Sanitary Code (SCSC) and all relevant standards of water supply
and sewage disposal systems.. Design and flow specification, subsurface
soil conditions and site plan details will have to be approved by the Suffolk
County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). This impact is not
considered significant due to the anticipated project compliance with
established requirements of the SCSC and the SCDHS and the required
relevant permits.
- For Further Information: . '
Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner
Address: Planning Board
Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938
cc: John P. Cahill, DEC Albany
Suffolk County Dept. of Health
Suffolk County Water Authority
New York State Dept. of Transportation
Judith Terry, Town Clerk
Suffolk County Dept. ofIPublic Works
Southold Town Building Dept.
Applicant
13u,Lbi tis Wiow- rent
� µEiGN-r
NOTICE OF HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road,
Southold, New York, concerning this property.
OWNER(S) OF RECORD:
�iVeRt+EAD�UIL/D�►YE� �uPPty
DATE -OF PUBLIC HEARING:
b MbAl. AleC14 23 Iq
PW m q
If you have an interest in this project, you are invited to view the Town file(s).
which are available for inspection prior to the day of the hearing during normal
business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
BOARD OF APPEALS •TOWN OF SOUTHOLD (516) 765-1809
\rm*JAM&_S lllA- IR02r'_ I A h,,- Xk i A
NOTICE OF HEARINGS
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS
THURSDAY, MAY 14, 1998
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town
Law and the Code of the Town of Southold, the following applications
will be held for public hearings by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF
APPEALS, at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New
York 11971, on THURSDAY, MAY 14, 1998 at the time noted below (or as
soon thereafter as possible) :
6:45 p.m. Appl. No, 4565 - STEVEN ZUHOSKI . Variance under
Article XXIV, Section 100-244, based upon the Building Inspector's
March 30, 1998. Notice of Disapproval . for a proposed garage addition with
an insufficient side yard setback at property known as 1090 Gold Spur
Street, Cutchogue; 1000-95-4-18.12.
6:50 p.m. Appl. No. 4566 - FRANK BER.TETTO. Variance under
Article XXIV, Section 100-244B, based upon the Building Inspector's
April 7, 1998 Notice of Disapproval for an "as* built" garage addition.
Pending building permit No. 24632Z was issued 2/3/98. Location of
Property: 695 Shore Drive, Greenport; 1000-47-2-18.
6:55 p.m. Appl. No. 4564 - BAYVIEW/SOUTH HARBOR, L.P.
Variance under Article III, Section 100-33, based upon the February 10,
1998 Notice of Disapproval issued by the Building Inspector, to locate a
proposed accessory garage in an R-80 Zone District in an area other
Page 2 - Legal Notic .
Hearings for May 14, i998
Southold Town Board of Appeals
than the required rear yard. Location of Property: Along the easterly
Side of South Harbor Road (also extending; near the end of Grange
Road), Southold; 1000-75-4-22.6 (formerly parcel of 22.4) .
it
7:00 p.m. Carryover Hearings from March 23, 1998:
T. PETIKAS. Proposed two-family use on a.'21,000+- sq. ft. parcel in
this R-40 Residential Zone District. Location of Property: Corner of .
the Westerly Side of Sound Road and the Northerly Side of North Road
(C. R. 48) (a/k/a Northerly End of Main Street) , Greenport;
1000-35-1-8, which requires approval from the Board of Appeals for -the
following:
a) Special Exception Application No. 4525 as provided by Article
III -A, Section 100-30A.2 for a two-family use/ and
b) Variance Application'' No. 4526 as provided under Section
100-31A.3 for the reason that the substandard lot size of 21,483 sq. ft.
does ' not conform to the requirements for a two-family dwelling use in
this R-40 Zone District; and
c) fence in
excess of
four -ft: height limitation within
or along
front yard areas,
based upon
the building inspector's Tebruary
10, 1998
Notice of Disapproval, Article XXIII, Section 100-231.
l`
7:10 p.m. Appl. . No. 4560 - ROBERT AND. ANN SHANK.
(Carryover hearing from April 16, 1998 for continuation) . .
820 Fisherman's ' Beach Road, Cutchogue; 1000-111-1-19.1.
7:25 p.m. Appl. No. 4547 - RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY.
This is
a
request for a variance based upon the
Building Inspector's
January-
2,
1998 Notice of Disapproval which reads as
follows:
Page 3 - Legal Noti(
Hearings for May 14, 1998
Southold Town Board of. Appeals
"...1) the proposed structure being located in an LIO District is
permitted to have a maximum of 60 feet of frontage on one street. The
proposed building is. approximately 115 feet facing Rt. 25, Article XIII,
Section 100-133C; 2) When fences are located in or along side and rear
yards, they shall not exceed 6-1/2 feet in height, pursuant to
100-231B...." : Location of Property: 74610 and 74500 Main Road,
Greenport, NY; 1000-46-1-1 and 2.1, combined as a single lot.,
The Board of Appeals will at said time' and . place hear any and all
persons or representatives desiring to be heard in the above applications
or desiring to submit written statements before the end of each
hearing. The hearing
will not
start" earlier than
designated. The
file
is available for review
during
regular Town Hall
business hours
(8-4
p.m.) . If you have questions, please do not hesitate to call 765-1809.
Dated: April 20, 1998. BY ORDER :OF THE SOUTHOLD
TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, Chairman
by Linda Kowalslfl
7:10 p.m. Carryover Hearing from March 23, 1998: RIVERHEAD
BUILDING SUPPLY CO.
OFFICE OF
BOARD OF APPEALS
53095 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
(1-516) 765.-1809 tel. (1-516) 765-9064 fax.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++.....++++++++++1111+++++++++++++1111+++-
March 6, 1998
Re: ZBA Application
Hearing Date: Monday, March 23, 1998
Dear Sir or Madam:
For your records, please find enclosed a copy of the Legal Notice
which will be published by our office in the upcoming issue of the L.I.
Traveler newspaper.
Under the requirements of Chapter 58 of Town Law, we are
requesting that you send a copy of this Notice ' at this time by certified
mail, return receipt requested, to the all surrounding; property owners.
Please include a copy of a map or sketch describing the 'setbacks and
building(s) with your mailings and your telephone, number. These mailings
must be postmarked by 3/11 if possible, and be forwarded to all owners, as
listed on the Town Assessment records, of vacant , or improved lands across
streets and along all sides abutting the boundaries of the subject lot.
Please also post the enclosed Poster in the location described by
A Ch. 58 of the Code (that is, within ten (10) feet of the front property line
facing the street, for a. period of not less than seven (7) days) . The sign
may not be posted later than 3/15. If the sign is torn or removed due to
adverse weather conditions, let us know and we will provide another.
Please return the Affidavit of Mailing with the white certified mail
receipts (postmarked by the post office) for our file prior to the hearing
Page 2 - Instruction Le,
Meeting of March 23, 1998
Southold Town Board of Appeals
date by mail or in person. The return receipt green cards may be
returned at the hearing (or before) .
If you have questions, please feel free to call.
Very truly yours,
Linda Kowalski
Board Secretary
Enclosures
AS400/1nag.98/app1.1n
n
r
NOTICE OF HEARINGS
as soon thereafter as possible) :
7:40
SOUTHOLD
TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS
BUILDING SUPPLY.
MONDAY,
MARCH 23, 1998
variance based upon the
NOTICE
IS HEREBY GIVEN,
pursuant to Section 267 of the Town
Law and the
Code of the Town of
Southold, the following application
will
be held for
public hearing by
the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD
OF
APPEALS, at
the Southold Town
Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold,
New
York 11971,
on MONDAY, MARCH
23, 1998 at the time noted below
(or
as soon thereafter as possible) :
7:40
p.m. Appl.
No. 4547 - RIVERHEAD
BUILDING SUPPLY.
This is a
request for a
variance based upon the
Building Inspector's
January 2,
1998 Notice of
Disapproval which reads as
follows:
"... 1) the proposed structure being located in an LIO District is
permitted to have a maximum of 60 feet of frontage on one street. The
proposed building is approximately 115 feet facing Rt. 25, Article XIII,
Section 100-133C; 2) When fences are located in or along side and rear
yards, they shall not exceed 6-1/2 feet in height, pursuant to
100-231B ....11 Location of Property: 74610 and 74500 Main Road,
Greenport, NY; 1000-46-1-1 and 2.1, combined as a single lot.
The Board of Appeals will at said time and place hear any and all
persons or representatives desiring to be heard in the above application
or desiring to submit written statements before the end of each
hearing. The hearing will not start earlier than designated. The file
y
Page 2 - Legal Notice
Regular Meeting of March 23, 1998
Southold Town Board of Appeals
is available for review during regular Town Hall business hours (8-4
p.m.) . If you have questions, please do not hesitate to call 765-1809.
Dated: March 6, 1998. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD
TOWN BOARD, OF APPEALS
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, Chairman
by Linda Kowalski
buildinil
g, permit No.
Drive;;Greenpori rJ000-47;-2-
11
icoaa.�a►5v,ca�vuuwg=-ucaa;,.ug
ead of Gfange Road);Southold;
.10000; 75-4.-22.6 (tbrmerly.par-
P-. -- ariyoX(r:Hearings
fro`m�MarchZ3;�1.998�:;fi2�;�--:
=;:T:l?ETIKAS: Proposed;
21two; -
familv;use,on,a;,000+ sq;i.t. .
erty: ;Corner., of;;the-. Westerly
Side,;of� Sound_Road and the
Northerly, .,Side; of;:North', Road. ,
(CwR:8)i(a/Ida Northerly,End -
of*Main'. Street�;,�Greenport; -
1.0;00=35,1=8; which require5.ap-
proval for;ttie Board. ofAppeals
fortho=followijtig :;•��; ���;:;,�._•
a): Special Exceptiori,Applica
tion No,;;4525. &,provide&by,.
,Articler>I.II=A,�� Section�=i:00-•
3M.'2 fora. twb=family;use/oc
cupancy; and=s
�-*Variatice:A�p--plical ori'No.
4526,as provided under -Section
100-31A.3 for the reas6filliat_the
substandard- lots isize?•of;=21,483
sq:;ft.,,doesziiot,conf6r.m-to the
requirements; for,'a: two;. amrl .
7dWellinguse-in- this{:R-40- Zon�
`Distridt'' `.1�.^%':.
. �c)ifence::in�.excess offour=-ft..
hei&jimitation within ofalong . .
front,yard-aieas;liasediip6ndhe .
10;1998, NoticeM-Disapprovai;,
AAickDa1II;'Secti6n 100,-2,3'1.!-,..
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
STATE OF NEW YORK ss:
Patricia C. Lollot, being duly sworn, says that
she is the Production Coordinator, of the TRAV-
ELER WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed
at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the no-
tice of which the annexed is a printed copy,
has been published in said Traveler Watchman
o . ..
nce each . . week for
..................................................:................ weeks
successively, co mencing on the .. ...............
dao............ ...�.......... ........... .191V
Y
..��....�...�.....^..... ....:..................................
Sworn to before me this ......... :r� .......:`day of
...................... %, - ............................... 19
,../Q
Notary Public
BARBARA A. SCHNEIDER
NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New York
No. 4806846
Qualified in Sutfoik'Caen
Commission Expires
.NOTICE OF HEARINGS
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS
MONDAY, MARCH 23, 1998
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town
Law and the Code of the Town of Southold, the following application will
be held for public hearing by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF
APPEALS, at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New
York 11971, on MONDAY, MARCH 23, 1998 at the time noted below (or
as soon thereafter as possible) :
7:40 p.m. Appl. No. 4547 - RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY.
This is a request for a variance based upon the Building Inspector's
January 2, 1998 Notice of Disapproval which reads as follows:
"...1) the proposed structure being located in an LIO District is
permitted to have a maximum of 60 feet of frontage on one street. The
proposed building is approximately 115 feet facing Rt. 25, Article XIII,
Section 100-133C; 2) When fences are located in or along side and rear
yards, they shall not exceed 6-1/2 feet in height, pursuant to
100-231B...." Location of Property: 74610 and 74500 Main Road,
Greenport, NY; 1000-46-1-1 and 2.1, combined as a single lot.
The Board of Appeals will at said time and place hear any and all
persons or representatives desiring to be heard in the above application
or desiring to submit written statements before the end of each
hearing. The hearing will not start earlier than designated. The file
Page 2 - Legal Notic_
Regular Meeting of March 23, 1998
Southold Town Board of Appeals
is available for review during regular Town Hall business hours (8-4
p.m.). If you have questions, please do not hesitate to call 765-1809.
Dated: March 6, 1998. BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD
TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, Chairman
by Linda Kowalski
SOUTHOLD TOWN.
BOARD OF APPEALS
%,.MA-RCH_13-'-1998;1
HEREBYY
iIV•EN; pursuant to Section267
)f•the .Town. Law. andAhe Code
sf - the Town of Southold,- the
bllowing. applications' will be
seld'for public;hearing'by the
'OUTHOLD TOWN. BOARD
)F APPEALS;at the -Southold
Cown Hall,'53095 Main Road;
iouthold, New,York-11971; on.
vIONDAY MARCH, 23, 1998
it the. times noted below. (or as
*on thereafter as-Ossible)`.'
6:35: p,m _'Appl•:',�No. 4550-
ItUTH MILLER.'Tliis. is'aAr l
guest fora Vaiiancelasecl upon.
:he Building I ispector's;Jani Ory
26, 1998 Notice pf Disapproval
:o locate, a proposed dwel - . 1. d`
:lit!on with reduction, in total side ,
yards.- Location of Property:.
54.00 :; Indian :;Neck ':Road,:
Peconic;'County Parce11000-867
7-2:2:::;:x: ,:. •.,�:::�:,.:. ,,r . :
6:40- p.m! App1. No.'4549
CAROL •':arid' ANTHONY'
LOSOUADRO` :`JR•'' `AND`
DONALb-'TUTHILL...•fVari
I.
arice'basi d;iZpon,ari;applicati`on
to erect" a' corral,to.,an.existing:;
barn,, and Febivary,43, 1998.;
Notice of;;Dis.wh
approvat-ich
reads "...horses,.shall not, -bet:
housed. within forty (40) •feet ofp
any lotline:�Artidle I11; Section/
100-3.1 C(8);: and Notice of Dis-
approval dated February 1-8,
`Article' III;' Section 100-
1998;
31 A2(fi); that'ttie-,vacaq.propeity -;
t
located%n`a�eiieral�Bi%srrress (B) -
district, re10,
quiresacres or,more :;
for, keeping 6�fi4ses, Article IIIc
Section,100-31A-z(b).••"-(Also,
ref.:Sections.100-101•A-�1. and:!
100-i01C.) Applicant's are pro-
posing corral,loca6n; Vicluding.
existing barn,- for, -Up. to • two
horses °as` an' accessory' to their
residence'of6rol and Anthony
Losq 1'ocated Yat X28 5 5
Boisseau Avenue,` Southold,
NY; Parcel„100'0-5,-5=12.L A
porti6n'•of'the corral/feiicrtig
`,•.,,;,•.;
would extend':onto:a portion of v
vacaiitl.prop,etty .of,_D?naId/b
Tuthill;. ki}own as -3125 �Boissezfin j
Avenu_ e�S'outhbld=,'`1000=55-5'='
`6,:45`.poh pP� 'No;, 45'S3 '= �:i
CHESTER ORI'OW SKI. Tlisis ` ;
a requestJ0f , ,a'ya iance�:based :;
upon the Burldipg;�sPeci”-; j,
February;20,-1998Notrceof!Dts :-,
approval. or. thei;pioposed
41W oftw000w�rudnws-with
taining a:-,nonVcoirformrng- use
,
Article,;XXI;`Sectioii��100-
I'S.:UMain':.;Road, •-.
Cutchoguer �QO,QjA7, frl 14;'`
6:50: p.m.. Appt: f4o... 4552-.
GEORGE LIVANO'S. ,T'his is -a
upon . the, Building: Inspector's
February• 11,.11499ffi, Notice •o
Disapproval,-Artiele'IIlA;` Secy;
tion' 100'-30A',A;, fora reduction '
in tlie proposedsideyard setback
at a• corner portion -'of proposed
ac ce4ory`buildirig.(garage). Lot.
Size andZone:.7500j+= sct_ f£;iR-
402one:,District,_ Location; of:,;
Property; .555'Sound:Beach
Drive; Mattituek; also known as-..
Estate; 1000-49-1-23.
5
P., III pl: No:,4Q68-
ELEANOR __EVERNICH. '
This -is. A.carryover; hearing re-
garding arequest k6r variances)
in this pending division project
(proposed ,two lots), _,Article
XXIII; Section 100 239'and Ar
iicle.IIL'Section:100-32; as to.
totat-Iot size.in this,R-90'Zone/
District:; Location of Property:
3200.Cox•Neck Road; Mattituck;
1000=113=8 5 containing 161,
997 sq.
. ':00 p•rn, 'App I..No.,, 455'1-
KAYLA B. STOTSKY:. This ,
a. request for a,.Variance,.based
upon; the building, inspector's
February •9, 1998 Notice of pis -
approval; Article XXIII; Section
100=23'1-A: Applicant is propos-
ing a fence at a height n. excess
of four feet along thefront yard
area (right-cifline)
at_ 3.35 'Osprey:1est Road,
Greenport;
1:000•-35,6;33,; also
known as Lot #§,•Section I, Map
of Cleaves point. ; , ;,t•- : ;
..:7:05 p.m-. iAPpl,,,No•,4548=
JEFFREYWORTHINGTON::; �D
This: is'areque.sf for a varianee�\
based'' upon• .'e^'Bu'il'ding
inspector's.' January' 20,,'.1998"
Notice'of Disapproval'' to. ;c'on-.
struct an,accessory buildug'(ga
rage) ,on the- "as built" founda
tion, which: is- located in' a, side
yard area, Article III -A, Section
100-33.' Location of Property::
1025 'Uh, - 'Creek •Drive,
Southold,"' 1000-55=328; •also.
known'as•-Lot3`l2 ,Map --of
Yenne.cott Park.:`
,pm:'ITHEODORE
MARIA PET-IKAS.;., Thi's.:is :a
request:for•.a,two, family usezat
the;corner:of w/s SOAnd;Road ,
and? n/s,Main or. North. Road.
(C.R: 48); Greenport, -1'000-35,b
1•=8; ;which requires, approval . 14o
frordthe-Board-of Appeals for
the -'following:- '• '`; ' : "'""'�''` ""Hist
`'a-` Special. Eide 'ti `Qnf'A 'Appl"
T , p ,P.,., .
cation N.o.; 4525,as:pzoyde;liy' `
c,.•,...
Article IIT -A,, SectiQri 1 OV-,, Q :2..
fora two -f amily:use/occupancy;
;i -;b) Variance: Application No:•
4'5264s'provided under Section.
l ooi34A-:3;foii-tlie.reasondih ft the.
substandard lot siie of21;483-sq.
:. "!
ft. does-Jnbf corifoYrm'to-''ttie re-
quireme�t's foc aat"w'o ;family
Dis,X and`.:,,;',
1;':c�,f�nce rn,excess,9f,.�our Ji;t:
height,linlitatio_rE 'rthin oF• along
front yard,ai?a� �?�.ed;ppvn the.
building spect9es Febr•gary.d0;
_i4gi_ i2o"f Disapproval, eArr:
trcleXXIII Sectiori'100=231,70.
7:40',p iiir �-Ap'P1. No 4547_
RIVERH'EAD SUILDTNG
SUPPLY:'his..isa`request fpi a
variance based.updiithe Build -
i &Inspec,tor's{hJai p`ary:2•;,;1X98
Notice:o�f.iDisalipzQyal;;wliich
posed structure being>locatecl in
an LIO; District,.:isr petmitted to.
have a-m'aximum of-'60:-feet'of
fr6ntage'6n one -street: The'pro=-
pose"d buildirig'is approximately
11`$, feet'facing• Rt.' 25', Article
XIII; Se,tion'100'-1330;;',2):
When fences; are''located. in: or
along side _arid ;Fear yards,. they
shall notjpxceedf6%.:fegt,i,n;
height, pursuant to ,100-231 B;.;'.,
COUNTY OF _FFOLK
STATE OF NEW YORK ss:
Patricia C. Lollot, being duly sworn, says that
she is the Production Coordinator, of the TRAV-
ELER WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed
at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the no-
tice of which the annexed is a printed copy,
has been published in said Traveler Watchman
once each week for /
.......... .............................................................. weeks
successively, commencing on the .....�h
y e
....................................................................
Sworn to before me this...... ..... ..............day of
M RRc19.
H ................... .95
.................
.........................................................
Notary Public
BARBARA A SCHNEIDER
NOTARY PUBUC, State of New York
No. 4806M
Qualified in Suffolk -County /
Commission Expires
Location of Er6perty:,74610 and
74500 MairiRoad; Greeripoit,�
NY; 100046-1-1 and'2:1, com-
:::.bided as=a siriglelot..rtw° _'
The Board of Appals will at -
said time arid_place hear any and
all persons `or.rep'resenfatives
desiring to bep heard in the above
:applications•or_desinAg,to sub
mit written•statements bnfore the
end, of -each.-hearing: The:hears
ing will not stat earlier --than des_
ignated: The file is -available for
review' during'Town'Hall busi=
mess hours'(8, 'plui.) Ifyou have
tiestioiis' I'ease do not hesitate
to„call_765.A 809• . - .
._;i,Dated: MV Ycti 6; 1998-,'; ;
By;ORDER;OF THE .
::,:: ,; :�,:w>,SOUTHOL:D;TOWN•
f' i "BOARD;OF APPEALS vv�
.. ;;;_ :.•:: GERARD-P./
GOEHRINGER `Chaff -in
By: Linda Kowalski
1X=3%12/98(51)
I
N
OFFICE OF
BOARD OF APPEALS
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
(1-516) 765-1809 tel. (1-516) 765-9064 fax.
February 20, 1998
Patricia C. Moore, Esq.
Moore & Moore
P.O. Box 483
Matti tuck, NY 11952
Re: Appl. No. 4547 - Riverhead Building Supply
Dear Mrs. -+Moore:
This will confirm that the above application is pending and under
review by the board members. In the interim, please furnish:
,,k (a) the additional sets (6) of the site plan map which have not
9Y -,-been delivered;
b) two sets of the building diagram or construction plans;
(c) copies of communications. from the Planning Board indicating
the latest development regarding site plan elements and
whether or not additional .information has been requested
under the site plan process.
if the above maps are received by Thursday, March 5, 1998, we
will be in a position to advertise the application for a March
hearing. In the event they ar\e received after March 5, 1998, the
hearing would be carried over to",,the next Regular Meeting inspections
calendar and hearing calendar.
Very truly yours,
Gerard P. Goehringer
Chairman
r
5,J
PATRICIA C. MOORE
Attorney at Law
315 Westphalia Road
P.O. Box 483
Mattituck, New York 11952
Tel: (516) 298-5629
Fax: -(516)298-5664
Margaret Rutkowski
Secretary
February 25, 1998
Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals FEB 61998
Mr. Goehringer, Chairman
Southold Town Hall ��
53095 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Appeal No. 4547 Riverhead Building Supply
Dear Chairman and Board of Appeals:
In response to your February 20, 1998„letter, I have enclosed
the following communications from the Southold Town Planning Board:
1. July 11, 1997 letter from Greenport Fire Department.
Riverhead Building Supply Response to their questions:
A. The Building will comply with all National Fire
Prevention Association standards and New'York State Fire Codes.
(The Building Department has reviewed the construction plans and
has verbally approved same for code compliance).
B. The building will have sprinklers.
2. August 13, 1997 letter from the State of New York Department
of Transportation for information: The DOT has, since the date of
this letter, accepted the plans on Nov. 4, 1997 (Case # 97-139).
Also enclosed are the following: an additional six set of site
plan maps, and two sets of the building diagram or construction
plans.
Thank you for your anticipated scheduling the hearing for
March. If you have any questions, or request any additional
documents, please do not hesitate to contact me. -
Very truly yours,
(:atricia C. Moore
cc: Allen.M. Smith, Esq.
Riverhead Building Supply
Donald Denis, Architect
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR.
Chairman
WILLIAM J. CREMERS
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR.
RICHARD G. WARD
August 29, 1997
Patrica Moore Esq.
315 Westphalia Road
Mattituck, NY 411952
PI ANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
RE: Riverhead Building and Supply
Main Road, Greenport
SCTM# 1000-46-1-2.1
i
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-3136
Telephone (516) 765-1938
Dear Mrs. Moore,
i The Planning Board has received the enclosed letters from the New York
State Department of Transportation and the Greenport Fire Chief.
They are being sent to you for your information and response.
If you have any questions, or need additional information, please contact
this office.
�Yer Y.
c9
i'
o
tibe t Kassnee
Site Plan Reviewer
Encls :
cc: Greenport Fire Chief
CHIEF WARREN JENSEN
1sT ASST. THOMAS R. WATKINS Sr.
2N0 ASST. WAYDE T. MANWARING
TREAS. K. LANGONE
SECRETARY C. CAPRISE
CHAPLAIN C. KUMJIAN
July 11, 1997
Organized 1845
�,.. Pb
E.Mall - gre�enpport-id@juno.com
(516) 477-9801 - STATION 1
(516) 477-1943 - CHIEFS OFFICE
(516) 477-4012 - FAX/MESS
P.O. BOX 58
THIRD STREET
GREENPORT, NY 11944
Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Southold Town Planning Board
PO Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Riverhead Building Supply, SCTM# 46.-1-2.1
Dear Mr. Orlowski:
I have reviewed the enclosed site plan and recommend that this meet all
National Fire Prevention Assocition standards and New York State Fire Codes.
In addition, I would like to request that all fire flows meet Insurance Services
Office Inc. standards.
I am also interested in knowing whether or not this building will be fire -
sprinkled.
Sincerelv��
Warren J se `-
Chief
WJ:cc
At 14 1997 �; J
tn��rld
30ju!"
CRAIG :NRACtISA, P.E.
ACTING REGIONAL DIRECTOR
August ',3, 1 997
Mr. Robert G. Kassncr
Southold Planning; Board
Town Hall
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1 179 '
Southold, New York 11971
STATE OF NEW YORK
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE OFFICE BUILDING
250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY
HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11766-5516
Riverhead 13uildinla Stag ly
Route 25
Greenport
JOSEPH H. BOARDMAN
COMMISSIONER
Dear Mr. Kassner:
We have reviewed the Environmental Assessment Form for the referenced proposed reconstruction.
We concur that the Southold Planning; Board should assume SE'QR lead agency status.
The State has no construction pr()jccis scheduled in this location in our five year planning program.
For highway work hermit information, please have the developer contact V. Lena at 952-6020. For other
information you may contact G. l3cierling at 952-6128.
'17iank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal.
very truly yours,
MIC IIAEA, A'LI?R
Planning & Program Management
vq
1
r•
AUG 19 1997
�. _......._....s`'t.r`�iaf'iii!'; ;ttir•1�{;.,... ,....
X '00A
P AT Rt, I A C, ;
N'
k\ Ahmonq M [il)'Ve
115
16
Fax: (516) 29fzAe:6'4
...... ..... ..... .... .... ...... ... ... ....
FEB 2, 5
Vabrvary 240
Towna Zoning C,,, ard of
Goehringer, clhiirx�ai,�
SvUtAold Town Hall
53095 XaJj6n Rdad
Soutboldi NY 11571
Rez Hy4y Harbpr C'Mab.,
U
Pdvdlx�,hoadf, wm.� �i 4547
Doan.- Linda-,
Hav 5%rb"qK wer FA'x,Iwj, s*-xrvc�,�
will, beg! providil* 6 wx"Ittc-'A d . r,
Oft,
proposed front and so We Vat*
wAriit-ten deescription. 040 It 0. you aa Soo X1
d 'M P,
J;J. ijA Y,
6 last board. hoaw-IA 'T
A,t th
rovi-,7,7 oi your MZ '-ta"86-yo yo; i" "h P%
yoktr ri-10- 01. of
2
the Q
The plano, wAillLI
I Will reVietj
advise you of sal0e.
If you knave any
pl$400 do not hesititto- -"0 - 4.",
�'yoq
clh C, Moore
PATRICIA C. MOORE
Attomey at Law
315 Westphalia Road
P.O. Box 483
Mattituck, New York 11952
Tel: (516) 298-5629
Fax: (516) 298-5664
Margaret Rutkowski
Secretary
February 3, 1998
Southold Town Zoning Board of.Appeals
Southold Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Riverhead Building Supply Corp.,
Dear Linda:
Enclosed please find the following:
1. An application for a variance from the width requirements of
pursuant to Town Code Section 100-133, as well as a variance for.
the fence height.
2. SEQRA - Short Environmental Form
3. Transactional Disclosure Form
4. original -signed and sealed drawings prepared by Donald Denis,
Architect of the site plan (Si), elevations (Al), internal layout
(A2) and the map submitted to the Town Board for the Zoning
application that provides the location of the existing buildings
and property lines (RZ1).
Mr. Denis will be away until next week. Therefore, I have
submitted one complete set of drawings. Upon Mr. Denis's return I
can provide the board with as many sets as you need.
Also enclosed -is a Riverhead Building Supply check in the
amount of $550.00 for the application fees. If there is anything
else the board needs please do not hesitate to contact me.
Uery truly yours,
��atricia C. Moore
cc: Allen Smith, Esq.,
Riverhead Building Supply Corp.
ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
MARRIAGE OFFICER
RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
TO: Zoning Board of Appeals
i
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
FR9rJI: Office of the Town Clerk
DATE: February 9, 1998 -
RE: ZONING APPEAL APPL— NO. 4547 - RIVERHEAD BUILDING
SUPPLY \
Transmitted herewith is ZONING APPEAL APPL. NO. 4547 - RIVERHEAD
BUILDING SUPPLY together with the Short Environmental Assessment
Forms the Applicant Transactional Disclosure Form, the Notice of
Disapproval from the Building Department, a letter from Patricia C.
Moore to Town Attorney, Laury Dowd, a copy of the Application for
Building Permit and a Disclosure form from William D. Moore.
Elizabeth A. Neville
Southold Town Clerk
ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE, TOWN CLERK
RECEIPT 68217
Town of Southold 19 C (i
Southold, New York 11971 DATE �(�r 7
Phone: 167651800
550Gb
$"
NED OF: n n 1i i l—r
FOR:
❑ CASH BY:
Cd �hECK # o� 9_3 -
Reason for Appeal Continued
Zoning Board of Appeals
re: Riverhead Building Supply Corp.
Pursuant to Town Law section 267b-3, the Southold Town Zoning
Board of Appeals is to analyze and asses the personal benefits
anticipated by the applicant against the potentially deleterious
effects that a grant of the relief requested would have on the
health, safety and welfare of the effected neighborhood or
community. In performing this balancing'test, the Zoning Board is
charged with the responsibility to consider the five factors
enumerated in Town Law Section 267b -3(b). The variance should be
granted for the following reasons:
1. No undesirable change will be produced in the character of the
neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, if the variance
is granted.
A. Riverhead Building Supply Corp acquired the 315 acre
parcel, and obtained a change of zone from the Southold Town Board
to LIO zoning use district. The purposes of the change of zone and
acquisition were to develop the existing 2.2 acre Riverhead
Building Supply Corp parcel with preexisting nonconforming
structures and adjacent 3.5 acre parcel into a full service
facility. The Planning Board reviewed the proposal and proposed
site plan and recommended the change of zone with the following
comments: "1. The proposed change of zone is to permit better use
and design of the existing Riverhead Supply. site. The Company
proposed a state of the art operation that will include a pick up
and pay, drive thru lumber building."
2. "The HD designated property (3.5 acres) is less than
ideal for residential housing as it is located behind the 7-11
store and next to the tracks and the LIO zone. Further, its small
size and poor location prohibits adequate buffering of a dense
residential use from commercial uses to the north and west."
B. The Planning Board's review of the proposal considered
the character of the neighborhood and impact on nearby properties.
The change of zone was considered and granted with the proposed
plan as is before the Zoning Board. '
C. The proposed structures will be in conformity with the
New York State Fire Prevention and Building Code, and Handicap
Accessibility laws. The proposed structures will enhance the
character of the commercial area.
D. The proposed structure will be a significant investment
in the Town - of Southold, and any impact on the character of the
neighborhood by the proposed width of the building will be
mitigated by the site plan compliance.
E. .The front of the building will contain the retail sales
and business office which is designed in character with the new
development in this district. The back of the building will be
warehouse (covered storage of building materials). A single
complex will replace the preexisting nonconforming structures
located on the parcel.
2. The benefit sought by the applicant can not be achieved by
some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an
area variance. The developing technology for building supply
facilities make this investment economically necessary. The
existing facility is less economically viable in its present
condition, it is anticipated that the proposed modern facility will
continue the prosperity of the business on the east end and
continue to provide jobs in the community.
With regard to the arbitrary 60 foot width requirement in the
Southold Town Code, the code disregards the setback requirements in
the LIO district, does not distinguish between a two acre parcel
and the subject 5.7 acre parcel, and does not address the different
uses in the applicable zoning districts.
The proposed use is within a single structure; the warehouse
portion of the structure will provide for covered storage of
building materials and a state-of-the-art building supply center.
A vehicle drives through the warehouse, loads the first quality
material from the stacks to the contractor's vehicles and then
payment is made at the exit. Such a use can not be accomplished in
a 60 foot wide structure.
With regard to the fence height, an 8 foot security fence is
located on this parcel and would be extended to secure the entire
parcel as shown on the site plan. The 8 foot high fence is for the
protection of the public as well as to secure the material.
3. The area variance is not substantial The application of the
balancing test weighs in favor of the grant of the variance. A 325
foot wide parcel in a LIO district requires 30 foot side yards (60'
total) therefore the building could be as much as 265 feet in
width given the side yard setbacks in the Bulk Schedule. A 60 foot
wide building is unreasonable, the property should be developed
through the site plan process not with arbitrary widths which have
no relation to the use or size of the parcel. The 60 foot width
was created to address strip centers- not an individual use. The
proposed use, a building supply complex can not be achieved without
the proper width of the building. With regard to the fence, 8 feet
is a standard security fence.
The two existing structures are set back approximately 28 feet
from the Main Road. The easterly structure is 72 feet wide and 1
foot off the side property line, the westerly structure is 45 feet
wide and set off 5 feet off the side property line. Both
structures are a combined width of 117 feet
( the proposed structure is @ 115) In addition the structures are
only 30 feet apart and therefore occupy the entire parcel without
required screening or parking. The proposed structure will be a
significant improvement to the existing conditions of the site.
4. The variance will have no adverse effect or impact on the
physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or
district.
The use is permitted in the LIO district, the property will be
properly vegetated through an extensive site plan process, the new
structures will enhance the property and will replace several
structures which are nonconforming and do not provide adequate
screening.
5. The alleged difficulty was not self-created.
6. The variance requested is the minimum variance practicable
given the personal benefits anticipated by the applicant. The
proposed structure is designed by persons in the building supply
trade. The applicants have spent countless hours with the design
professionals and suppliers to design a state -of -the art complex.
The warehouse is customized for the use, the retail and office
portion were designed by Don Denis, architect, with the changing
and improving business character of the district. With regard to
the fence, the security fence is in character with the adjacent
commercial uses.
We respectfully request that the appeal be granted, together with
any further relief that is deemed necessary and reasonable.
si
State of New York )
County of Suffolk ) ss.:
Sworn to this day
Notary Public
i
PATRICIA C. MOORE
Attorney at Law
315 Westphalia Road
P.O. Box 483
Mattituck, New York 11952
Tel: (516) 298-5629
Fax: (516) 298-5664
Ms. Laury Dowd
Southold Town Attorney
Southold Town Hall
Main Road.
Southold, NY 11971
December 29, 1997
Re: Riverhead Building Supply Inc.
Dear Ms. Dowd:
In accordance with our telephone conversation on this date,
my client, Riverhead Building Supply, and Mr. Goodale are aware
that the proposed building is located between two parcels.
Mr. Goodale and Riverhead Building Supply will address this
issue prior to an application to the Town for a building permit on
the structures.
Please ask the Building Inspector to issue a notice of
disapproval with regard to all zoning variances except the zero
sideyard setback between the two parcels. This issue will be moot
prior to the issuance of a building permit for the proposed
structures.
Thank you for your anticipated courtesies.
Very truly yours,
Patricia C. Moore
PCM/mr-
cc: Allen Smith, Esq.
Riverhead Building Supply�`�
't ~
i
The N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act requires submission
of this form, and an environmental review will be tt:ade Ly this iloara
before any action is taken.
SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
INSTRUCTIONS:
(a) In order to answer the questions in this short EAF it is assumed
that the preparer will use currently available information concerning the
project and the likely impacts of the action. It is not expected that.
additional studies, research or other investigations will be undertaken.
(b) If any question has been answered Yes the project may be sig-
nificant and completed Environmental Assessment Form is necessary.
(c) If all questions have been answered No it is likely that the
project is not significant.
(d) Environmental Assessment
1. Will project result in a large physical change
to the project site or physically'alter more
than 10 acres of land? Yes No
2. Will there be a major change to any unique or
unusual land form on the site? Yes No
3. Will project alter or have a large effect on /
an existing body of water? _Yes ✓ No
4. Will project have a potentially large impact on
groundwater quality? Yes /No
5. Will project significantly effect drainage flow
on adjacent sites? Yes /U.
6. Will project affect any threatened or endangered /
plant or animal species? Yes J No
7. Will project result in a major adverse effect on
air quality? Yes ,/o
8. Will project have a major effect on visual char-
acter of the community or scenic views or vistas
known to be important to the community? Yes /No
9. Will project adversely impact any site or struct-
ure.of historic, pre_historic, or paleontological
importance or any site designated as a critical
envire.nmental area by a local agency? _Yes _No
10. Will project have a major effect on existing or
future recreational opportunities? Yes INO
11. Will project result in major traffic problems or
cause a major effect to existing transportation
systems? Yes No
12. Will project regularly cause.objectionable odors,
noise, glare, vibration,,or electrical disturb- /
ante as a result of the project's operation? _Yes V No
13. Will project have any impact on public health
or safety? _Yes �//No
14. Will project affect the existing community by /
directly causing a growth in permanent popula- ✓
tion of more than 5 percent over_a one-year Yes No
period or have a major negative effect on the
character of the community or neighborhood?
15. Is there public con roverssyyconcerning the _
project? _Yes /No
Preparer-s Signature: /' �,/,, g
Representing: /?Gl/e-e1z GZ,1 zzyy • Z:e4 Date:
ZBA 4/75 G
i
14-16.4 (2187)—Text 12S EQ R
PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.21
Appendix C
State Environmental Quality Review
SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only
hu Annlinnnt nr PrniPCt q nnsnr)
1. APPLICANT /SPONSOR 2. PROJEC NAME
�22f v� s(v
3. PROJECT LOCATION:
Municipality %GZ e>7� Op� cSOUT 1OL-D County
4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map)
7q�/o 7ysoo ma�� ,�1, �rort
5. IS PROPOSED ACTION:
99 New ❑ Expansion ❑ Modification/alteration
6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY:
7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: S
Initially 5' ' acres Ultimately acres
S. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS?
ClYes No, If No, describe briefly �� /,✓l00th
%Jiegv/res a VC+ Hance
9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT?
G Residential ! Industrial Commercial ❑ Agriculture ParkfForesUOpen space Other
Describe:
U1 Lpllo-
to. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL OR FUNDING. NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL
STATE OR LOCAL)? �L
Yes ❑ No If yes, list agency(s) and permittapprovals �j/im/�L %
11. 'COES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTQ14 HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL?
c791 Yes (�_. N,--� If ye list agency name and permitiapproval
Ile
ems
12. AS A RESULT IOF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMITIAPPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION?'
❑ Yes No
I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
Date: 02 3
Applicant/sponsor name-
Signature:�''��
If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the
Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment
OVER
1 ' (Conti nue.d on reverse ,side )
The Town o
interest o
purpose of
alert the
it to take
APPLICANT
TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURR FORM
Southold's Code of Ethics prole
the part of town officers and
his form is to provide informa
wn of possible conflicts of in
liatever action is riecessary to
ipits coni[
employees.
Lion which
hoioa!- n"A
avoid same
ices of -
The .
can
allow
YOUR NAME: �DC��L 6dOD�LE
(Last name, first name, middle initial, unless
you are applying in Elie name of someone else or
other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate
the other person's or company's name.)
NATURE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.)
Tax grievance
Variance �_
Change of zone
Approval of plat
Exemption from plat or
Other
(If "Other," name the
official map
activity.)
Do you personally (or through your company, spout:e, sibling,
parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or
employee of the 'Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes
by blood, marriage, or business interest_ "Business
interest" means a business, including a partnership, in
which the town, officer or employee has evert a partial
ownership of (or employment- by) a corporation in which
the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the
shares.
YES NO
If you answered "YES," complete the balance of.til,is form and
date and sign where indicated.
Name of person employed by Elie Town of Southold
Title or position of that person
Describe the relationship between yourself (Elie applicant)
and the town officer or employee. Either check the
appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in Elie space
provided.
The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling,
parent, or child is (check all that; apply):
A) the owner of greater than 5%.6f- the shares or the
corporate stock or the applicant (when the applicant
Is a corporation);
B) Elie legal or beneficial owner or any interest in a
noncorporate entity (when the applicant is not a
corporation);
C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of Elie
applicant; or
D) Elie actual applicant.
DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP
Submitted this .0Abda f Fcb 1992
Signature
Print- name__ 9r,.r l ao�a
DISCLOSURE
I, William D. Moore hereby state pursuant to,General Municipal Law Section 809 and
Southold Town Code Article 10 the following:
1. An application has been submitted by Patricia C. Moore to the Southold Town
.Zoning Board of Appeals on behalf of the Riverhead Building !Supply Corp. ,
2. Patricia C. Moore is an attorney duly licensed in the State of New York practicing
as a sole practicioner with her own clients. She is not affiliated with my law practice.
3. Patricia C. Moore is my wife.
4. I am a member of the Southold Town Board.
5. I do not directly or indirectly review, discuss or participate to any extent in the
matter of the Riverhead Building Supply Corp. before the Southold Town Zoning Board.
6. Patricia C. Moore is compensated for her legal services, at an hourly rate,
regardless of the outcome of the case, and her fee is not contingent on the results obtained.
Dated: February 3, 1998
Ts
r
r
SNOUI.O RER g,„ "' �� ' B.C. 41.13 EX\'o ,.,.
E�ALK
47.8 � tAc- CURB 'GONG'
_ ,0- 7 _ -� p, GO P
EXISTING 10'0 WATER MAIN. AFFI2 SIGNS 'pAvvn tkls •'j/� NEw RXtSSING NYT
� � "EAST 25" 1
SUFFOLK COUNTY _ "TRUCK 25' 09 EDclE OF GONG 51-etj 944-2A
WATER AUTHORITY �' EXISTING i i 7 s SIGN t ARRO
f �i ' NEtU P
I 0 WATER NOTE ALIGN NC.
� l SERVICE SPEED LIMIT 30'_ - - - _ _ _ _ C -A- 51DE ALK W1 EXISTING
01 41. 5
EXISTING, ' nCUR t SIDE ALK
17 EpGE OF PAVEMENT Q\� F1C SIGN 1809 INLET u B
DRAIN -1 k T.C.B C. +4
SO , ` (MILE MARKER) 'GR T>��
g.�R\pING l� • \1 IG5I3 0104 00 i � (RSR-NOOT) _ \ / ' �
17, gµOUIOER O � ttl � fT77 ) As'
N
7c "GURg•GUS \ O' __- 4e. 11h0;12' DEE , - NES "'°� • ',, AREA �%��
TR EARING 4 YT LAN �•c, e �c S T�11/
HALT (5E e
17,q! f` DETAIL) C
17,11 k �O g�F \ �, " G�B1` I - V p0Sg�B
Ro z � , - a � aR Lg
\ 8J31 M 40 _a _ A �.. ` , 8 C'Qclss 4 LOT
17 li R RONC: NY
' T
s AQP j t.G• \ °' 1 \ \ / °° aCCBsg
33 E ID, r ` _ so
RAMP DOWN gH�tipE�g rA °a1'3n s c e.r. , , NEW AS e.
TRAFFIC SIGNS CURB FACIN P pR8 S G.,e �`, 4B�c $ SIGN M _ _ - -1 `a•G ORIENT PT FERRY TRA ►Mii17, 73 SHELTER 15 FERR Op PA` t ARRO 7 15°Q4' 44.E \;f �t1� `1 e.c. ro ' _ ` (1°1 I �.lp.z.u.,,Ie� \Ige,
� ®N' GONG• g\� � p�,v\Na\`\ �1 �,� 41.00 e.,o `\ INS
. �� �'•
17 vE0 \ 94 NE\U P• "nZ F,A 8c 4e !^•t.ca•
38 P A PIA = std'3 d w \ RE L T.c- g c •,e ; ® ` I °•
O 1 ,,,.o
,p 49.0 A `'1 w\� 1 ' Al �' , t
1797 � PAVED \ _ M ," � a `- PHAL\f \
/ ray \P VING 'U5 I I r- .
iErkG wP �iSTY C
Ol5p�etiF`/ 71J
96
g A 01 REP P
.,eW S\NGSN.
VC
REMSOVED V c
;.9ac tp / Z _
A a~10
i
n
�' � o
� � 1 W ST �E pF ' ' ' • � ..LP rn d •. ° NG ERTEN � � / O.
J
! XISTIN noo
CIRCq- / (p ATER /) )Z (S�A (3)Z O
3P TORA�,E AT/ON N �"�` E� I8 YP CNGS l q NG ERVIC lu
��
ACEs / 8 AR '� CJ n 13 ,\3 O—
1-1
-' ' �q.-°• � I \ 110 % / c
)9-'
1 ' 3) 13)J c'_' „ f
(2)A
Iry
f=%CIS
_ Q / / �,,e / /®� •'c\.'''—e�,'`,, ` 83 /\� .cd
,
l3)Z -/ l,\—,,a '••••
S AEl.07-I C. C
0,� OS
I
GCT BuILDINGs dSUNRIS N�
o
00.1
�p
4'
V-' 0
COACH NES
• • o`o /
Q
c I NYDR Not 2, � / ,DO��:• '' � 0 g.F• / • EXoL$1 `°�° 122
�711
OvvtAcl
.O
•O J � \
TES: c � � C O / \ 1 5 ENS Gp,L ,' `.< ; O �,
Soo
O oma" / l \QO \ 00
SITE DATA: �° I
G,.� / �L • _ - \ _ ,7 FEN jG N o
SITE AREA: ° 8' NIGH i F'F --'�- 5 c• D� EE
I / .21'10 ACRES) p P. c�;�� .-„�cy'�,.`� / � SACK �,�--\� 4 10, O P CF y/
LOT 1 (94,51 S.F. 2 ENCS I L ''
OT 2 (162,011 S.F./ 3.121 ACRES) ”` S O L�" X 5' CH�NG /
I
9 A RES a I ®.T i4't I ; / ; ;-''�,J-E `` _;''\ O \*5
?00\-5 OLS
SITE TOTAL: S. / 5. 38 C
i `, cl.;: •. BANI C 6 o -'� / o CNIMNE� C \ LP, o
ZONING: oc A/ Ln
' E TEM i A ; DENSER• - \
LOT I t LOT 2 I 8 �;;°o' ,' REMO`/ED' 01.\oJ� C O
ZONING: LIO
(LIGHT INDUSTRIAL P RK/ '" /
1 ,, � UJ g.F • ,
PLANNED OFFICE PA K) �, I S.00 /
YARDS:ArlO,
FRONT: 100
SIDE (ONE): 30'
1 4,45-
"
SIDE (BOTH) 40' �(HD
REAR: 15' UA\1,+t1C. NO \
EOOoc
LOT COVERAGE: DOq O \J
\GO'�
LOT COVERAGE: 20% (MAX.)
/
I
/
/
(258,692 S.F. x 20% = 51.128 S.F. MAX. BUILDING FOOTPRINT)1 ` /
x.,,15 / , 's O F::F • ; /
p,RE• /
up Alt
O I I / I• j 1 1. O' LU
I'
UP
8US Y,4
a5
V \ �. rtG l \•i'/ , : G�a6' OTNI$ AREA
or
PARKING: lO'j\ O
RETAIL: 1/200 S.F. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA
OFFICE: 1/100 S.F. OF OFFICE FLOOR AREA /
0 /
WAREHOUSE: 1/1000 S.F. ' / `
OF GROSS FLOOR AREA it
N lV P. 20 / / N -
LANDSCAPING: v- / ,'-\X J, ° / F.
LANDSCAPE AREA: 35% (MINIMUM)
.
/l lOMR(258,442 S.F. x 35% = 90,525 S.F. LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED) >< CP ONS/TS!R
U )p Co
PROVIDED: APPROX. 98.300 S.F.; 38.0% ry 0 (kA
Or
T!
0
N
LANDSCAPE BUFFERS: a77A4 Z)17..
FRONT YARD: 25' 47 TR/CT(SIDE/REAR): 4' 4
PERIMETER
BUFFER TO RESIDENTIAL ZONE: 30'
P /
\� i EklS
7-' OP
IVG
PROPOSED SITE PLAN:/
O lC,4y� 4e /
SQUARE FOOTAGE: /,•\ F3/ / / / \ �\ 04.,' /
BUILDING I t CHECK OUT
RETAIL: 8,650 S.F.
• / j r l / it % ` I l
OFFICE: 4503.F.
CHECK-OUT: 250 S.F. : / / O r
/
WAREHOUSE: 5,000 S.F.
SUB TOTAL: 14,350 S.F. /
BUILDING 2 (DRIVE-THRU)' /
OG, r / l
` _ r 1 C -.
23,640 S.F. �e / : FA\ / l r -/�G�+'\�b0 l
J /
BUILDING 3 (STORAGE)
5000 S.F./ ► / , _ 0 /
TOTAL: 43,010 S.F, r I
LOT COVERAGE: (LOT 1 t 2) 14.1 % / ' 9 / ;/ /
/ I' /
P F , 0 -- / /
PARKING
BUILDING I t CHECK OUT / , / /
��
RETAIL: 8450 S.F./200= 43..3 SPACES / / '/ \`-
OFFICE: 100 S.F./100= 1.0 SPACES ' ` / of
WAREHOUSE: 5,000 S.F./1000= 5.0 SPACES / . /�\ O - _ •�' \ _
BUILDING 2 t 3: 28,440 S.F./1000= 28.1 SPACES* u�L 1
\ / : � � ry ��N � 70',0„
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED: 84 SPAC - \ ; �3,6b ' l
45 SPACE'S / O , !
TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: � , , F I`• S. P.
*NOTE: OPERATIONAL CONCEPT INCORPORATES, 4%. :/ (D 1
INTERNAL DRIVE-THRU SERVICE WHICH SHOULD REDUCE /\\// / / '
$
OUTDOOR PARKING REQUIREMENTS. \ 0
\ / / r O tY
/ r
\\ : �, • �'°° � ; � O ; REP C, `b .0 8 (.jf',L �
4 O \
\ ,-41
r ','-- \ ' SYMBOLS:
/.I
/ 44,
,OE i
/0 O ,
\ I
YE Nr I 1 1 I
4i ,I REM HG
AT/Q� S rTO
_H16 A
l \ 1
' rGA
\ / _
K` /
\ /,�� Fq/ ^- •--- `T!QEI�CH oR i' . , \� \ / \', l I / Il /l l
/
SYM
DESCRIPTION
TC
TOP OF CURB
BC
BOTTOM OF CURB
•
BOLLARD
TG
TOP OF GRATE
TL
TOP OF LID
FF
FINISHED FLOOR
R
RADIUS
EX
EXISTING
10.2
EX. ELEVATION
+10.0
NEW ELEVATION
.'-`.
EXISTING CONTOUR
FORMER CONTOUR
REV.:
5 NOV 2001 SCHO
21 NOV 2001 PLANNING
NEW CONTOUR
/ •
( 30 ,0p - - - l ,5
30,,x•
/ - EY SITUATE- GREENPORT, NY
'0
O�
414 - - - - ` T� Vwc CCH
a / RFLO
SNG
C,q� � \ w
Nc
\ k/S
+47so 6 .
\ AS/ Ca T I 1 I
? RA T lug C CN
AR LOuj 4 ), e , / ENCS I I
c+4'25O AGE
j cd
T
l; ® ; \ 4"_' / NFw.G1�,4 t.u�'1•�5 \®,----- - - - _ mR� RAP
m \ / VL N` \P \A r ) PE
/ I
O '
70°
0 -Tb, ,150 ,T Ca'd1' Ili / b,1 / • ' I
8' ,3 OSCE ,3 41' � _ ------------ / 2(,r2.90'
1 /
ClC,H *a ,� l - - - ° "W - - - -- - - -___-/ / 1 / O 5 10 20 30 50
_ _ _ ° - — ► I ------------------ _N_�j-12_(CiZ_O-R6�0_______ ____, I
f�LAN FIJ
.4O' I �_ _____LO_N_C115_LA _ _ ______
5.84-10',40"W° ° I 131 `.---- --------------------------- _ -- -----— - - ---I `2�'-
/ / / -- -
- -- - - - - -' - '- -
- _ _ - -
- - - - - -- - -- '- --
LOCALE:
DRAWING INFO.
DRAWING NO.
___----
__--------- -- _
GREENPORT
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SCALE: I" = 20'-0"
ARC HtTECT: - — — -"
JOB:
SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY
JOB NO: 9604
DATE: 21 AUG 2001
DONALD A. DENISD
P.O.BOX 565
p BU5LD�H(3
SCTMtt
000-44-1-2.1
REV.:
5 NOV 2001 SCHO
21 NOV 2001 PLANNING
61
MAIN ROAD
RIVERHEAD
18 DEC 2001 NYS DOT
AQUEBOGUE, NY
BUILDING SUPPLY
MAIN ROAD (RTE. 258�:
GREENPORT,NY
M DOD18
Ho
� � LI�J p O � IJ
U Lry U LIOF
DEC 2001 A.R.B.
52
CURB CUT 35'-0"
3'-O"
fe # 30'. DRIVEWAY WIDTH -
MAX. SLOPE
1/12
3/4" EXPANSION
JOINT
P. CO C. SIDE ALK,
SCOR 5' O.C.
SCORE
MARKS
3/4" EXPANSION
JOINT
51-O„ 131_01#
STRIPING IN OVERRIDE
AREA FOR LARGE TRACTOR
TRAILERS
SIDEWALK. CLASS F.
ITEM 10608.0103
hSO
IDEW LK WIDT
MA CH EXI TING
CURB
VARIABLE SLOPES)
3'- " (MIN.)
INCREASE AS
NECESSARY TO
ATTAIN 1/12 SLOPE
DRIVEWAY PLAN
DIMENSION "C" SEE TABLE DWG. NO. T -I
51-0'(f)* SIDEWALK , I DRIVEWAY
E *(MATCH EXISTING WIDTH)
FULL HEIGHT NORMAL SIDEWALK
CURB ��� rELEVATION i 1
�---�( 1/4' PER FT. ____-�
R=1" _______ --------------
------3/4" PER FT.---_-------- ----- -•-•---•-
cr
MIN. SLOPE= 1/4" PEPER
R FT. WIRE FABRIC
ITEM 10608.0103
1 1 SCORE MARK
DRIVEWAY_I I
CURB SECTION 1 I NOTE: THE FIRST FULL 5' FLAG OF SIDEWALK
TO EITHER SIDE OF DRIVEWAY SHALL BE 8" THICK.
WIRE FABRIC REINFORCED. ITEM 10408.0103
DRIVEWAY SECTION
SNOW STORAGE STRIP I 5'-O'(t)* SIDEWALK I OFFSET STRIP
(MATCH EXISTING WIDTH) *(MATCH EXISTING WIDTH) 3'-O' DESIRABLE
' GRASS STRIP 1/4' PER FT. (MIN. PITCH)
ITEM 408.0101 (4')
ITEM 203.1
CONCETE A SIDEWALK SECTION
(ITEM 104041.2801)
I/2' = 1'-0'
I '
�-
CURB/FAVING
ROAD FRONTAGE (N.Y.S. RT. 25) DRIVEWAYS I. PARKING AREAS
N.Y.S. D.O.T. (MEET ALL TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SPECIFICATIONS)
4' (MIN.)
(VARIES)
1 1/2' RADIUS 1„ 4" P.CONC.
ITEM 18403.1'135, I I/2" TOP CURB
SAW CUT GRADE 7
EXISTING PAVING PAVING TO HAVE
EpGE OF 1/4" PER FOOT SLOPE
TRAVEL LANE
ITEM 180403.1335. \ NOTE: THE END OF CURB
1 1/2' BINDER 0 NOT ABUTTING EXISTING
ITEM 403.11. CURB SHALL BE RAMPED
5 i/2" BASE - - - DOWN TO ZERO HEIGHT
O' AT LOCATIONS ST
ITEM 1'1304.1011 A.O.B.E±/ --AL I i
FACING TRAFFIC.
J�
ITEM 1049.2801
CURB INLET BOX
t,i v C fl /l T
JRB BOX
ON -MOUNTABLE)
EM 455.05
1-----------------i
-----------------
D.O.T.
----------------
D.O.T. NOTES
AFTER COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, ALL EXISTING
DRAINAGE STRUCTURES ALONG RIGHT OF WAY, ADJACENT
TO PROPERTY. ARE TO BE CLEANED.
ANY TRAFFIC SIGNS MOVED SHALL BE REPLACED IN
ORIGINAL LOCATION.
ANY TRAFFIC SIGNS DAMAGED SHALL BE REPAIRED
TO ORIGINAL CONDITION, OR REPLACED WITH NEW
1 1\2' NYS TYP
IA MIX
2 1/2" COMPACTED
BITUMINOUS MIX 7
COMPACTED
BASE
P.CONC.
[-CURB
'I II GRADE
N.Y.S. D.O.T. TRAFFIC CONTROL AT SHOULDER
AND SLOWLY MOVING WORK AREAS
0 --�I
ADVANCE WARNING
300 TO 500'
150' TAPER
100' LONGITUDINAL BUFFER
END
ROAD WORK
LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE:
A -i$I- POST MOUNTED 115111 METAL HALIDE FIXTURE,
EXCELINE SAR SERIES MOUNTED ON 14 FT
4 INCH SQUARE POLE. SHIELD FROM ADJACENT
PROPERTIES.
B +O WALL MOUNTED I5 WATT METAL HALIDE FIXTURE
HAOCO SWAN SERIES V'4131-
C:
4131.C &) WALL
EXCELINE 300 SERIES WALL16 TT METAL HALIDE
CUBE
D EXCLE ELINE EU SAFDSERI SD LIGHT. 400 SILHOUETTE. 4FTTMETALLPOLEfDE
E O SURFACE MOUNTED CANOPY FIXTURE.
150 WATT METAL HALIDE.
EXCELINE MP SERIES MINIPRO.
ARCHITECT: JOB:
DONALD A. DENIS
P'.O.13OX 565 RIVERHEAD
MAIN ROAD BUILDING SUPPLY
AQUEBOGUE, N.Y. MAIN ROAD (RT.25)
(516)122-3511 GREENPORT, NY
ULD
x
x 28' C N E
TYPIC L ,�,,x
x
5H
END
ROAD WORK
WORK AREA
100' L NGITUDINAL BUFFER
ER
150' TAPER
+
300 TO 500"
ADVANCE WARNING
O
Ra B111DING SUPPLY
EMS mk Flor),01 I l�im
TEST HOLE 4B-4:
INFORMATION FROM:
McDONALD GEDSCIENCE
SOUTHOLD, NY
14 JAN 1991
EL +48.5'
0 DARK BROWN
I' SILTY LOAM (OL)
BROWN LOAMY
3' SILT (ML)
BROWN FINE TO
COARSE SAND (SW)
12.1' WATER
WATER IN BROWN
FINE TO COARSE
SAND (SW)
SANITARY CALCULATIONS:
GWM ZONE IV, YIELD: LOO GPD PER ACRE
COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY IS PROVIDED BY SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
YIELD= 400 GPD/ACRE
PERMITTED DENSITY = 5.938 ACRES x 400 GPD/ACRE = 3562.4 GPD
DRY STORE FLOW: 0.03 GPD PER S.F. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA
WAREHOUSE SPACE: 0.04 GPD PER S.F. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA
DENSITY CALCULATIONS:
PROPOSED BUILDINGS: BUILDING I (MAIN RETAIL AREA) 14.100 SF
CHECKOUT 250 S.F.
BUILDING 2 (DRIVE-THRU RETAIL SPACE) 23440 S.F.
SUBTOTAL 38.010 S.F.
FLOW 38,010 S.F. x 0.03 GPD PER S.F. = 1140 GPD
BUILDING 3 (STORAGE) 5000 S.F.
FLOW 5,000 S.F. x 0.04 GPD PER S.F. = 200 GPD
COMBINED FLOWS 1340 GPD
PROPOSED DENSITY: 1340 GPD / 5.938 ACRES = 226 GPD/ACRE
SANITARY SYSTEM DESIGN:
SEPTIC TANK:
SEPTIC TANK W/ (2) DAY FLOW): 1340 GPD x 2 DAYS = 2480 GAL.
USE 3000 GAL. SEPTIC TANK
LEACHING POOLS:
SANITARY FLOW: 1340 GPD
LEACHING RATE: 1.5 GAL./S.F./DAY
SIDEWALL AREA REQUIRED: 1340 GPD DIVIDED BY 1.5 GAL/S.F./DAY = 893 S.F.
SIDEWALL AREA PROVIDED: (4) 10'-0"0 X 5'-0" DEEP POOLS = 942 S.F.
USE (6) 10'-O"� x 5'-0" DEEP PDOLS w/ TRAFFIC BEARING DOMES t C.I. COVERS
NEIGHBORING WELLS WITHIN ISO FT
NO KNOWN PRIVATE OR PUBLIC WELLS WITHIN 150 FT OF SITE
PROPERTIES WITHIN 150 FEET OF SITE
x
SCTM tt
STREET ADDRESS
NAME
x
1000-44-1
T
ROUTE 25
x
SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
1000-4L-2.IJ
10'
x
(APPLICANT)
deep
1000-44-2.2
ROUTE 25
SEVEN -ELEVEN
x
1000-44-4
x
SUNRISE COACH LINES
SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
1000-44-8
ROUTE 25
VACANT (THOMAS JURZENIA t WIFE)
x
1000-44-9
x
VACANT (ANNE MARIE NELSON)
3
1000-44-31.1
1000 NINTH ST
DRIFTWOOD COVE APARTMENTS
x
1000-45-6.1
x
SUNRISE COACH LINES
SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
1000-45-8.1
ROUTE 25
VERIZON
x
1000-45-8.3
x
PORTOBELLO RESTAURANT
SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
0.11
FT.
3613 C.F.
x
D
x
10'
d1a.x
T
deep
480 C.F.
x
11190 S.F.
5665
T
RAFFIC
3809 C.F.
3840 C.F.
E
LANE
LDER
x
6'
dee
.411 C.F.
1
2400 S.F.
0.11
TRAFFI
400 C.F.
"411 C.F.
F
LANE
10'
d1a.x
1'
x
480 C.F.
9
ULD
x
x 28' C N E
TYPIC L ,�,,x
x
5H
END
ROAD WORK
WORK AREA
100' L NGITUDINAL BUFFER
ER
150' TAPER
+
300 TO 500"
ADVANCE WARNING
O
Ra B111DING SUPPLY
EMS mk Flor),01 I l�im
TEST HOLE 4B-4:
INFORMATION FROM:
McDONALD GEDSCIENCE
SOUTHOLD, NY
14 JAN 1991
EL +48.5'
0 DARK BROWN
I' SILTY LOAM (OL)
BROWN LOAMY
3' SILT (ML)
BROWN FINE TO
COARSE SAND (SW)
12.1' WATER
WATER IN BROWN
FINE TO COARSE
SAND (SW)
SANITARY CALCULATIONS:
GWM ZONE IV, YIELD: LOO GPD PER ACRE
COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY IS PROVIDED BY SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
YIELD= 400 GPD/ACRE
PERMITTED DENSITY = 5.938 ACRES x 400 GPD/ACRE = 3562.4 GPD
DRY STORE FLOW: 0.03 GPD PER S.F. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA
WAREHOUSE SPACE: 0.04 GPD PER S.F. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA
DENSITY CALCULATIONS:
PROPOSED BUILDINGS: BUILDING I (MAIN RETAIL AREA) 14.100 SF
CHECKOUT 250 S.F.
BUILDING 2 (DRIVE-THRU RETAIL SPACE) 23440 S.F.
SUBTOTAL 38.010 S.F.
FLOW 38,010 S.F. x 0.03 GPD PER S.F. = 1140 GPD
BUILDING 3 (STORAGE) 5000 S.F.
FLOW 5,000 S.F. x 0.04 GPD PER S.F. = 200 GPD
COMBINED FLOWS 1340 GPD
PROPOSED DENSITY: 1340 GPD / 5.938 ACRES = 226 GPD/ACRE
SANITARY SYSTEM DESIGN:
SEPTIC TANK:
SEPTIC TANK W/ (2) DAY FLOW): 1340 GPD x 2 DAYS = 2480 GAL.
USE 3000 GAL. SEPTIC TANK
LEACHING POOLS:
SANITARY FLOW: 1340 GPD
LEACHING RATE: 1.5 GAL./S.F./DAY
SIDEWALL AREA REQUIRED: 1340 GPD DIVIDED BY 1.5 GAL/S.F./DAY = 893 S.F.
SIDEWALL AREA PROVIDED: (4) 10'-0"0 X 5'-0" DEEP POOLS = 942 S.F.
USE (6) 10'-O"� x 5'-0" DEEP PDOLS w/ TRAFFIC BEARING DOMES t C.I. COVERS
NEIGHBORING WELLS WITHIN ISO FT
NO KNOWN PRIVATE OR PUBLIC WELLS WITHIN 150 FT OF SITE
PROPERTIES WITHIN 150 FEET OF SITE
DESCRIPTION
SCTM tt
STREET ADDRESS
NAME
DOMESTIC WATER SOURCE
1000-44-1
T
ROUTE 25
RIVERHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY
SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
1000-4L-2.IJ
10'
dla.x
(APPLICANT)
deep
1000-44-2.2
ROUTE 25
SEVEN -ELEVEN
SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
1000-44-4
ROUTE 25
SUNRISE COACH LINES
SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
1000-44-8
ROUTE 25
VACANT (THOMAS JURZENIA t WIFE)
dia.x
1000-44-9
NINTH ST
VACANT (ANNE MARIE NELSON)
3
1000-44-31.1
1000 NINTH ST
DRIFTWOOD COVE APARTMENTS
SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
1000-45-6.1
14415 ROUTE 25
SUNRISE COACH LINES
SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
1000-45-8.1
ROUTE 25
VERIZON
SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
1000-45-8.3
14825 ROUTE 25
PORTOBELLO RESTAURANT
SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
NO OTHER PROPERTIES WITHIN 150 FEET
CAST IRON
COVERS
,!2=0' � GRADE
I' MIN./2' MAX.P.CONC.
COLLAR HEIGHT '- F- COLLAR
8" TRAFFIC
INLET- MI w BEARING SLAB
4"0 2400 P PE, ...........:� ........FLO OU LET- MIN.
MIN. PITC 1 4
PER I' '/ MIN. 40004-�PIPB .
' r PER I'
BAFFLE W/8"x 24"
OPENING
SEPTIC TANK
C.I. COVER 404) CLASS
'-O"IMIN) TO TO GRADE 2400 PIPE C.I. COVER
i
I' - "( MAX) (TYP.) �I/8" PER I' TO GRADE
EL +19.2-,,,,20" DIA. ACCE MIN. PITCH EL +48.1' +/- (TYP.)
4"0 CLASS NOTE: BACKFILL WITH
2400 PIPE INVERT CLEAN SAND FREE
1%4" PER I'ZEL +45.9' OF DEBRIS AND
MIN. PITCH INVERT INVERT INVERT '--------- ORGANIC MATTER
EL +41.0' EL +46.5' EL +44.4' LP -1114 INVERT LP -2,3,5,4
18" DROP T EL +45.
i<1
ItH
EL +40.8
__________�-REQ'D CLEARANCE _ _____EL +3g,QL ___
--------- -------------- ---------
GROUNDWATER ______EL +XQL--_
------------------- ----
10' x 5'-4" DEEP
LEACHING RINGS
SANITARY SYSTEM W/ 8" TRAFFIC BEARING SLAB
AREA
DESCRIPTION
DRAINAGE
RINGS
VOL.
EACH
NO,
AREA
ROOF
ADD-IN
2" RAIN
VOLUME
REQUIRED
VOLUME
PROVIDED
A
PARKING LOT
10'
dla.x
T
deep
480 C.F.
5
13410 S.F.
0.11
FT.
2245 C.F.
2400 C.F.
B
FRONT WEST
10'
dia.x
6'
deep
411 C.F.
3
4355 S.F.
2830 S.F.
0.11
FT.
1191 C.F.
1233 C.F.
C
WEST COURT
10'
d1a.x
T
deep
480 C.F.
8
11325 S.F.
4350 S.F.
0.11
FT.
3613 C.F.
3840 C.F.
D
EAST COURT
10'
d1a.x
T
deep
480 C.F.
8
11190 S.F.
5665
0.11
FT.
3809 C.F.
3840 C.F.
E
LOADING DOCK AREA
10'
dla.x
6'
dee
.411 C.F.
1
2400 S.F.
0.11
FT.
400 C.F.
"411 C.F.
F
WEST SHED AREA
10'
d1a.x
1'
deep
480 C.F.
9
10640 S.F.
14400 S.F.
0.11
FT.
4113 C.F.
4320 C.F.
G
EAST SHED AREA
10'
d►a.x
T
deep
480 C.F.
8
13190 S.F.
12530 S.F.
0.11
FT.
4381 C.F.
4320 C.F.
G
H
EAST SHED AREA, SE
SOUTH SHED AREA(HI)
Overflow
10' d1a.x
to woods
5.5' deeD
315 C.F.
1
1
9590 S.F.
0.11
FT.
1598 C.F.
541 C.F.
1508 C.F.
H
GRAVEL AREA (0.60 factor)
10'
d1a.x
5'
deep
342 C.F.
4
16910 S.F.
0.11
FT.
2121 C.F.
1110 C.F.
H
GRAVEL AREA, SE
Overflow
to
woods
1
1441 C.F.
I
MAIN BLDG, NE
10'
dla.x
5.5' deeD
315 C.F.
1
2830 S.F.
0.11
FT.
354 C.F.
315 C.F.
J
MAIN BLDG, SE
10'
d1a.x
4'
deep
214 C.F.
2
9350 S.F.
0.11
FT.
544 C.F.
548 C.F.
K
SHED 2, SE
10'
dla.x
4'
deep
214 C.F.
1
1265 S.F.
0.11
FT.
158 C.F.
214 C.F.
L
ENTRY AREA
10'
d1a.x
1'
deep
480 C.F.
1
2240 S.F.
- S.F.
0.11
FT.
313C.F.
480 C.F.
TOTAL
54
101910 S.F.
48220 S.F.
24548 C.F.
25,405 C.F.
ALL
DRAINAGE
RINGS SHALL HAVE
A TRAFFIC BEARING TOP SLAB AND A CAST IRON COVER
OR
GRATE SET
AT THE SPECIFIED
ELEVATION. DRAINAGE RINGS SHALL BE CONNECTED
AS
SHOWN WITH
12"0 CORRUGATED
POLYETHYLENE PIPE.
DRAINAGE RING (TYP)
NOTE: DRAINAGE PIPE
C.I. COVER/GRATE FROM DOWNSPOUTS TO
TO GRADE OR DRAINAGE RINGS TO BE
BURIED CONCRETE 8"0 PVC PIPING(SDR-35).
1'-0" TO COVER (SEE PLAN) DRAINAGE PIPE
2'-0" PRECAST CONNECTING DRAINAGE
COLLAR GRADE RINGS IN PAVED AREAS
SHALL BE 1200 CORR.
POLYETHYLENE PIPE.
TRAFFIC
OD BEARING
SLAB
2
IL
C) PRECAST
DRAINw X
RINGS
AGE
4�
>o
I
l------------------------ --
CLEARANCE
0 SELECT
I GRANULAR FILL- >
iv.............................�..... GROUND WATER
LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE:
REF.ts
QTY.
COMMON NAME
BOTANICAL NAME
SIZE
NOTES
M
SUGAR MAPLE
ACER SACCHARUM
2 1/2" CAL.
BtB
P
BRADFORD PEAR
PYRUS CALLERYANA
2" CAL.
BtB
B
GRAY BIRCH
BETULA POPULIFOLIA
8'-10'
CLUMPS
H
EASTERN WHITE PINE
PINUS STROBUS
C HIGH
C
EASTERN RED CEDAR
JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA
4' HIGH
J
SHORE JUNIPER
JUNIPERUS CONFERTA
15-18"
GROUND COVER
Y
AMERICAN YEW
TAXUS CANEDENSIS
15-18"
A
PINK AZALEA
RHODODENDRON SPP
15-18"
Z
RED AZALEA
RHODODENDRON SPP
15-18"
S
SPURGE
PACHYSANDRA TERM.
FLATS
GROUND COVER
LOCALE: DRAWING INFO.
GREENPORT SCALE: I" = 20'-0"
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD JOB NO: 9604
SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY DATE: 21 AUG 2001
5CTM4 1000-44-1-1 REV.:
1000-44-1-2.1 5 NOV 2001 SCHD
21 NOV 2001 PLANNING
18DEC 2001 D.O.T.
18 DEC 2001 A.R.B.
DRAWING NO.
S2
F
5
ROOF OVERHANG
EAST t WEST ELEVATIONS -BUILDING 2
- A I •• A I 111 -'
DOORS
NORTH t SOUTH ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 2
1/16° = 1'-0"
NORTH I SOUTH ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 3 EAST t WEST ELEVATIONS - BUILDING 3 (NO DOORS ON WEST)
VII = 1'-0" 1/16° = 1'-0"
11 A I I I A. I1MA l
SOUTH ELEVATION - BUILDING 1
1/8j1 = 11_01,
RAMP
FIBEI
SHIN,
'TAN
EAST ELEVATION - BUILDING 1
1/8° = 1,_0ll
A GO LIAI T IP_AI %/AI IIMC'
CEMENT
ILE5
FIBER
5HINGLI
'TAN'
WEST ELEVATION - BUILDING I
1/8" = 11-0"
PAINTED WHITE I _ -
NORTH ELEVATION - BUILDING I
1/8" = 1'-0"
D D D � H 8 U D D
D D DL
LOCALE:
TOWN OF T
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SUFFOLK COUNTY. NY
DRAWING INFO.
SOB 0: 19604 I' -O"
DATE: 5 SEPT 2001
DRAWING NO.
ARCHITECT:
DONALD A. DENIS
DONALD A.
JOB:
MAIN ROAD
AQUEBOGUE, N Y
RIV ERHEAD
BUILDING SUPPLY
o O V�%FoD
5CTMu 1000-44-1-1
1000 -4G -I-2.1
REV.:
21 NOV 2001 PLANNING
18 DEC 2001 ARB
MAIN ROAD (RTE. 25)
(631)122-3511
GREENPORT, NY
OF A2
CUSTOMER PARKING
ARCHITECT:
DONALD A. DENIS
P.O.BOX 565
MAIN ROAD
AQUEBOGUE, NY
(631)'122-3511
LAVATORIES � LUNCH ROON
JOB:
RIVERHEAD
BUILDING SUPPLY
MAIN ROAD (RTE. 25)
GREENPORT, NY
FllIVEFiHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY
BUILDING I FLOOR PLAN
LOCALE: DRAWING INFO. DRAWING NO.
GREENPORT SCALE: 1/8" = 1' -0 -
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD JOB NO: 96014
SUFFOLK COUNTY. NY DATE: 5 SEPT 2001
SCTM# 1000 -4G -I -I REV.:
1000-44-1-2.1 5 NOV 2001 PLANNING
18 DEC 2001 A.R.B.
OF A2
.+48.40
+49.00
•
ARCHITECT:
DONALD A. DENIS
P.O.BOX 565
MAIN ROAD
AQUEBOGUE, NY
(631)'122-3511
LAVATORIES � LUNCH ROON
JOB:
RIVERHEAD
BUILDING SUPPLY
MAIN ROAD (RTE. 25)
GREENPORT, NY
FllIVEFiHEAD BUILDING SUPPLY
BUILDING I FLOOR PLAN
LOCALE: DRAWING INFO. DRAWING NO.
GREENPORT SCALE: 1/8" = 1' -0 -
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD JOB NO: 96014
SUFFOLK COUNTY. NY DATE: 5 SEPT 2001
SCTM# 1000 -4G -I -I REV.:
1000-44-1-2.1 5 NOV 2001 PLANNING
18 DEC 2001 A.R.B.
OF A2
.+48.40
+49.00
`
�
'
�
' .
/
�
�
�
'
'
. /
`^
/
'
'
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
- - - /
/
. ~ /
/
^ /
`^ |
^^ |
~v` /
~` (
r Fl/
6-,
- __ _ _ _ _ __ _ -[� - -- -�-]-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -[�_ _- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _[l- _ - - - - _ - _-_Fl_ __ _ - _ _-__ _
~~ ~~ ^~ `~ ^~ ^� ^�
METAL
scmF
'
&J,����7~||MU����-T ELEVATION
�| �����~T���&J
|����� | F7LU���J | L-��L_ `� x�� � |��|�
)"IR-CHITECT:
Job:
LOCALE:
DWG. DATA:
DRAWING NO.
P.O.Box -;Lrj
I ED)
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SUFFOLK COUNTY. NY
JOB NO: 9404
BUILDING S',UPFLY
GRLENPORT, NY
OF A2
'd—
E
-f
m
I%
------------- - -------
I 1
I 1 I
1 1 1
I
I 1
I 1 1
1 1
I I
I i 1
I , 1
I I 1
I
1
1 1 1
I I 1
i 1
I I
I 1
1 1
I 1 �
1 I
1 1
1 1
I
i 1 1
i 1 I
1 I i
f-----------------=
i I I
I I 1
I 1 1
I i
I 1
1 1 1
I 1
I 1
1 1 I
1 i 1
i I
I
1 i
1 !
; 1 1
I I
I I I
I I
1 I
I i 1
I 1 `
1 1
1 , I
I I
1
i ; 1
I 4
I 1 I
I 1 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I
n
I I tT]
I 1
ii� 1 I
i ; 1
I I
I 1 1
I 1 1
I I ;,
1 i I 1
--
-_
D SAIL'" !G "10.
rn
r, �.,��
.IVB,. LAD
C3 F L '�
Ccri R.J
[MdW[ERHEb%[0 �
prn
E
-f
m
I%
------------- - -------
I 1
I 1 I
1 1 1
I
I 1
I 1 1
1 1
I I
I i 1
I , 1
I I 1
I
1
1 1 1
I I 1
i 1
I I
I 1
1 1
I 1 �
1 I
1 1
1 1
I
i 1 1
i 1 I
1 I i
f-----------------=
i I I
I I 1
I 1 1
I i
I 1
1 1 1
I 1
I 1
1 1 I
1 i 1
i I
I
1 i
1 !
; 1 1
I I
I I I
I I
1 I
I i 1
I 1 `
1 1
1 , I
I I
1
i ; 1
I 4
I 1 I
I 1 1
I I 1
I I 1
I I
n
I I tT]
I 1
ii� 1 I
i ; 1
I I
I 1 1
I 1 1
I I ;,
1 i I 1
steel roof panels i
--steel steel in rpt.,,l al -2.3
Tetul wall panels
�J
I
e core slay on 5ra„e ,
i t, '�,.•':� « tt ��..ia i^'3 i Yciw 4m. \'R
------ - - - - -- ---- - ----- ----------- -— --- - --- -- ---- ——
-- -
__----------- -__-_______..__-__.---------------
------------------
------------------------------
____-___--_--_.___-_..__y
1
l '
I 1
I
1 1
1 I I
I
I '
I 1
1 i 1
I 1
1 i I
I_______________________---______-__,�
._--__.___________--_______-_-__._-.-_ - _
__--.--------------
17
iFCR ELEVA ICNS C�7 RETA'L AREA '
I \ f
Ti \"u E
I I
-- - - - - - - - - -I- - - -- - - - - - - - L - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -
t— 1
1
F= EE 1
I
-
(------ - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -"- ---I-- - - - - - - - ---------- - - - - --
--
1
I
I
1
I --
—I— -----L-A---------------- -- ,
I
F3-- ------ — —
CcUTER,
I
I I
1 I ;
1 ,
,
a- --- --- -_== - --__ -- -
-- ---------- - - - - --
t ...... I
/ I
t 1
I 1
I
I ,
' � I
1 '
OFFICESI I / --- , -
R�t,
1
,,�.C�IVING
I C_, I LUNCH I M . ; lll NECH
- --� — ! - 1'--0" THICK CONCRETE
LtIALL I
t
I --
FIRE SEPARATION WALL BETWEEN RETAIL
AND WAREHOSE Tq BE THREE (3) HOUR
AND OPENING PRO I ECTIVES TO BE
THREE HOUR AND .'-,HALL BE SELF-CLOSING.
-----------
------------------------------ ------------------
CHECK-OUT
BOOTH
I
---------- ------ --- -- ---- -----------------------------
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
i
I
- -------------------------I--------------------------------
I
I
I
------------ -------- ---- -- - -----------------------------
I
I
I
. I
I
----------------------------------------------------------------
I
I
f
---------------------------
I
I
I
-- - - - - - - - - - - - --
!
I
I
I
I
I
---- ----------------
---
WAREHOOSE
I
-------------------------------,------------------------
I
I
---------- --- ------,----------------------
I
I
-- ---- -----------------------,------------------------ ------
all]
-----
Qll]
- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
I
I > r)
00
I
I
i
I
I
----------------------------- --------
---------------------------------------------------- --- - ---
^^ILLWORK
STOR, AG`
I
I
------------ -----------------------------
---------------------------------
-------------------------
I
I
I
Q 111
---------- ------
----------�--
-----------------------
>
---------------------1>
C F-
U cn
-----------------------------
M
---------------------------
i
LOADING DOCK
"IETAL
ROOF
� ^1ETAL
�1DINCs
1
I
1 -
l_O.AC NG DOC
°DELIVERIE: S
O\%=RNcAD
^DOORS
SOUTH =LE-VATIOM
ISI
tlt
in
QJ
F_
llJ
W
UA
j
G
U
AC�IITECT: J03:
,`,�,'� �r� .
--
-_
D SAIL'" !G "10.
rn
r, �.,��
.IVB,. LAD
C3 F L '�
Ccri R.J
[MdW[ERHEb%[0 �
prn
'�, -•^-a*
D A, 4, � `�
� *.
d
GREENPORT
T® U, C�- Cl1TE'OLD
4IJFFOLK COUNTY. Ii�tY
SCALE: I" = W -O"
JOB *t0• 9404
DATE: ME IM
11 t�ii
AQUE-130GUH-, N.Y.
BUILDINGC ieJ
SUPPLY
r .,....
0 r
e' I. l —. — —
,.CTI t 1000--14-1-1
1
7Z -
V .
r
R-,
MA!"� 'Ot�D l':T.2)
G"EE°.PO".T, ?dY
PE
steel roof panels i
--steel steel in rpt.,,l al -2.3
Tetul wall panels
�J
I
e core slay on 5ra„e ,
i t, '�,.•':� « tt ��..ia i^'3 i Yciw 4m. \'R
------ - - - - -- ---- - ----- ----------- -— --- - --- -- ---- ——
-- -
__----------- -__-_______..__-__.---------------
------------------
------------------------------
____-___--_--_.___-_..__y
1
l '
I 1
I
1 1
1 I I
I
I '
I 1
1 i 1
I 1
1 i I
I_______________________---______-__,�
._--__.___________--_______-_-__._-.-_ - _
__--.--------------
17
iFCR ELEVA ICNS C�7 RETA'L AREA '
I \ f
Ti \"u E
I I
-- - - - - - - - - -I- - - -- - - - - - - - L - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -
t— 1
1
F= EE 1
I
-
(------ - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -"- ---I-- - - - - - - - ---------- - - - - --
--
1
I
I
1
I --
—I— -----L-A---------------- -- ,
I
F3-- ------ — —
CcUTER,
I
I I
1 I ;
1 ,
,
a- --- --- -_== - --__ -- -
-- ---------- - - - - --
t ...... I
/ I
t 1
I 1
I
I ,
' � I
1 '
OFFICESI I / --- , -
R�t,
1
,,�.C�IVING
I C_, I LUNCH I M . ; lll NECH
- --� — ! - 1'--0" THICK CONCRETE
LtIALL I
t
I --
FIRE SEPARATION WALL BETWEEN RETAIL
AND WAREHOSE Tq BE THREE (3) HOUR
AND OPENING PRO I ECTIVES TO BE
THREE HOUR AND .'-,HALL BE SELF-CLOSING.
-----------
------------------------------ ------------------
CHECK-OUT
BOOTH
I
---------- ------ --- -- ---- -----------------------------
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
i
I
- -------------------------I--------------------------------
I
I
I
------------ -------- ---- -- - -----------------------------
I
I
I
. I
I
----------------------------------------------------------------
I
I
f
---------------------------
I
I
I
-- - - - - - - - - - - - --
!
I
I
I
I
I
---- ----------------
---
WAREHOOSE
I
-------------------------------,------------------------
I
I
---------- --- ------,----------------------
I
I
-- ---- -----------------------,------------------------ ------
all]
-----
Qll]
- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
I
I > r)
00
I
I
i
I
I
----------------------------- --------
---------------------------------------------------- --- - ---
^^ILLWORK
STOR, AG`
I
I
------------ -----------------------------
---------------------------------
-------------------------
I
I
I
Q 111
---------- ------
----------�--
-----------------------
>
---------------------1>
C F-
U cn
-----------------------------
M
---------------------------
i
LOADING DOCK
"IETAL
ROOF
� ^1ETAL
�1DINCs
1
I
1 -
l_O.AC NG DOC
°DELIVERIE: S
O\%=RNcAD
^DOORS
SOUTH =LE-VATIOM
ISI
tlt
in
QJ
F_
llJ
W
UA
j
G
U
AC�IITECT: J03:
,`,�,'� �r� .
LOCALE:
DWG. DATA:
D SAIL'" !G "10.
DONALD A. DILE-NIS
P.0.DOX 7, /.:3
MAIN RO�<D
r, �.,��
.IVB,. LAD
C3 F L '�
Ccri R.J
[MdW[ERHEb%[0 �
'�, -•^-a*
D A, 4, � `�
� *.
d
GREENPORT
T® U, C�- Cl1TE'OLD
4IJFFOLK COUNTY. Ii�tY
SCALE: I" = W -O"
JOB *t0• 9404
DATE: ME IM
11 t�ii
AQUE-130GUH-, N.Y.
BUILDINGC ieJ
SUPPLY
r .,....
$� ,r"'
�o
e' I. l —. — —
,.CTI t 1000--14-1-1
1
7Z -
V .
R-,
MA!"� 'Ot�D l':T.2)
G"EE°.PO".T, ?dY
p >
p p Q lT. D
n E I Mj �
�_
,a A
T �'�'
_E U Ll L�1
!
Or= A2
N.O.F.
H.X. CONSTRUCTION
CORP.
(HAMLET DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT)
NOTES:
SITE DATA:
SITE AREA:
LOT 1 (96.511 S -F./ 2.2110 ACRES)
LOT 2 062.011 S.F./ 3.121 ACRES)
SITE TOTAL: 258.692 S.F./ 5.938 ACRES
ZONING:
LOT I:
ZONING: LIO
(LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PARK/
PLANNED OFFICE PARK)
YARDS:
FRONT: 100'
SIDE (ONE): 30'
SIDE (BOTH) 60'
R -EAR: 7=7'
LOT COVERAGE: 20% (MAX.)
PROPOSED RE—ZONING:
LOT 2: (PROPOSED RE -ZONING TO LIO)
YARDS 8 COVERAGE SAME AS ABOVE
LOT COVERAGE:
LOT COVERAGE: 20% (MAX.)
(258,692 S.F. x 20% = 51,128 S.F. MAX. BUILDING FOOTPRINT)
�[�
RETAIL: 1/200 S.F. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA
OFFICE: 1/100 S.F. OF OFFICE FLOOR AREA
WAREHOUSE OR STORAGE BUILDING: 1/1000 S.F.
OF GROSS FLOOR AREA
STORAGE YARD: I/5000 S.F. OF STORAGE
AREA
LANDSCAPING:
LANDSCAPE AREA: 35% (MINIMUM)
(258,(.92 S.F. x 35% = 90,525 S.F. LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED)
LANDSCAPE BUFFERS:
FRONT YARD: 25'
PERIMETER (SIDE/REAR): 9'
BUFFER TO RESIDENTIAL ZONE: 30'
9)
RE -ZONING PLAN
= 30'-0'
ARCHITECT:
JOB:
SCALE
JOB N(
DONALD A. DENIS
P.O.BOX SG5
SITE LAYOUT:
RIVERHEAD
n
DtttJJJ
ROVERNE&D OL�DO ppL�
DATE:
REY:AI
N ROAD
BUILDING SUPPLY
VVVM
AQUI=BOCsUE. N.Y.
MAIN ROAD GREENPORT� NY25)
-0
(51G)�22-351f
OT4,v ZONING g
OARD OF APPEq S � �2
GERARD P. GOEHRINTOWN
R OF SOUTHOLI)
CHAIRMAN
JAMES
DIN-114,1-10'C�r� TOWN HALL
LYDIAORA P.O• BOX 1179
A TO Cc7r
Cp j/i�,S 53095 MAIN ROAD
LINDA KOWALSKI, BOARD SEC. SOUTHO 6D NY 11971
DhCf1 FAX ) 765-1809
Is = 30'—O' co,.._ - #(s16) 765-1823
): 9401 I
8 JULY 1994
/ ___-
�T�r �-
--
-
__ ----7
__ ____�- ,
~/ '
�. ~ `� � ' `' !
i ` ` ' `��' '� �� �`
`'~�,'. ' _. � ^
�`, / /�/ '�\~ ^ '^--
=-� ` �11
� `-
�Cf
/ �`°.
11
, ',D��F :)-, rj-'- - E A, R I IN f:ti,z, I __ -_ - . . 1,�_ M )
-_ -,---- % __ .-- I 1p___1 .: i�R i , - "' L \ .f T 77 -ID!F I- - � !:� .
, - - - - _ _____ _____:��::� -�_i�) � �� /I 1�3 \ __� ,_ ���� I I .. .
-1 7 J.f ____ --,-- .f 7 �j IF _, __ . -/4',; �/ , / '�/,/�_t- I � --- - * -�_ —�_: -,I- T ,�, ____�, r, ) . , T.& +41'�, , . -
'f 7 71 _ n /'�� ,� ." 1__"�,4 - - --��-, -q,,r:-S V - �.'X I S T 1,1:,� � . NE -
K-AtIP DOLUN , - � �, -�, i, ,,_��,r R,�: E 5 1,-'� N 1�,�j [LAWN 1� " T -C 14 8 _3 _.-
� -____ O� p �,\,l � ,rj� , _.-;.� % G N � M - - /! . ;
"�, -f 7 _ 'c' a 0 ju v, �� . -ql- (C , OLE I ; _"7- . " I , . ., 1, " I . . .
LOT 1 (9�511 SF,/ 2.1110 ACRES) V rt 01 ,, . - 4� �* --,* � -� -, .. . . . � x "' / *
LOT 2 (1.'2,011 S.F./ _3_1_,I ACRES) / \ I- M � k . �_._ . . ,\ I I . . . .
, T,C! +49.L ,, u ,,, - � C. , + A 8 \;(-, __ @
V_ , - ,�- UIL- (� t �c�,�,�,,,,_�_e . . .. . I _/ . . -
"d , o/N, �?'- I . . . I_ - I/ , , . A k- ,z: " I E, i . IL
___;2 Z. ____��, -.0 " - 547'", I -0 , - , ,�)7 ,,(a)), 0 � — — (3)
— — I 11, �,(^5)z�-) _:w� ___- _ T _�_ _\5 1 __ �
u�u��� S.F. ^�u� = �/.u� ���� n�x� �U|LU|�� �UU|��|N|) .
___- i�� V� � �__-(�YD,_ _-, . SANITAR r/
PARKING:
'
RETAIL: 1/200 5,F. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA
OFFICE- |/|()O 5.F� {)F OFFICE FLOOR AREA ' /-� � '
���EH{}U5E �� 5T{)R�GE BUILDING: |/|L�0{7 5f. ^'4y� ' �� ' -
{}F GROSS FLOOR AREA /�\� TC '
c�/ '~' -
STORAGE YARD. |/SO{)O 5F. OF STU��GE � ��� � -----
ARE�� ' / /�\ `��' ^' ' c --_-
' \�/ r- . T.C. +483 48.8 Z),EF"S�� cj,4 T,�
�z^ ��l'�� ---�� �� - �/
�����������' . I� ^ `i �c ^�as 3. -- ''''
LANDSCAPING: i�\ / ' ' r [> �" ~S^~'
JA, _'
- .� �`44_1_�__�C'1'111_ �
o
11
- ` k�, 9_�_
r( -
_ �) f �_ , - - /
0\, ' -
_ - - I - - /
/ASF _1-1 7 fi ,� ,,- , S, �_ /,4 �,
i ) )_ �
lo
/_
Lf��[}�C/�PE A�E�, �5� <�|N|�UM) -����___-- �T-(]^ I f / -- - - -----_ ��« ��«/ ' '�. 00.
(n58��2 �F ^ �5� ~ �(]�25 5F L4��5CAPE ��E4 RE(JU|�ED> -----'/-- ' / ' ou - -~ - ^ ''�
� ' (�\ _ �f,-i�^ t} _-_ ' � .�. �.
��' / /. .. ,_- � .�_ / _-- ..
"-` ~' . �/ ' ___� _ �� --_ ./ ��..
L��ND�(�APE BUFFERS. /c) / —�_� ' '^ ` ' ' // ---� ---- ' �'�"ATC. � . � � ,
FRONT Y�R[}� 2�' '~- ' --' 'T�~1�+e� ` --'-'--^ /� `-`��' -- /' ' ` 448' / 5� ��'���z
� '- / « / ~ ' | -' : ' u �� ----��- � -���z�/ --' _ // / � --_+� ' ^�� ��/+�o�o � � �
PE�iMETE� (SIDE/REAR), �' � � �c) � ' e��- ' A J � / -- ^� 7� / � � - '/ '�������� ,� / �' �
ourr�m /u ���/u�m///�� �wm�� �c/� -
I . _ I I . I . .. l L`i, . L; .- - / /1: ___ - _::� ,_ & - - - - - .0 " . ___ - - '___ - - - __ - - - .
. I I : ��) \\ _____ % . . .1-1-1 o ___ - i IV , , ------- / r__j - - - I - - . -1 --- I . .
PROPOSED SITE PLAN: -:I---____ I . . I � F: / . . . -, ,
'�
�{2U/4�E F{}DT�(�EEL -41 1 " EXISTING `u --- ' .� �'
~ /
RETAIL: 835O 5 F "
. , /
OFFICE: �5(} MOO( AL
S.F. /
WAREHOUSE: �|�2S S F
�Ou :1 161/
TOTAL: 5(].�25 �f� /
LOT COVERAGE: (LOT | � 2) |� 5�
� /
P��B�|�G. '�(�' /
~"" --EILLE'-- L) �� /
RETAIL: 8350 Sf./2(7{}= �18 SPACES --- ' �
~_' (�) BAC - ` ' ` ~ �/ � � �
DFF|(�E. ��O 5��/|O{)~ � � SPACES / --- - v�� - -- `. �< LEA(�H|N-`^--^'
WAREHOUSE: �|��5 S F /|()�JO= �| � 5pACES* ` \�/ � / --.` P{}DL� `^ /
STORAGE y���� |5.O�� � F /5O�D~ � �P��E5 ' -~- ' ��p 'IL T T�T H�� ` \
� » ' �L/ � ` � /
/ ~ HIGH . . - ` ' _- . ,�� . , -'
TOTAL �PA(�E5 �EC)U|�ED� 9/ 5p4{�E� {� - / ----_- / I
TOTAL �pA(�E5 P�{}V|OED 48 �p/\CE5 � ' / ^' ' ` ' ^�^ u�- .
� ^ . � -` . � / ----- ` �P��� ' /
'�-�o ' ' - - ' ' � r
,w��e. u��c o ��G COw |��J�pOe�Ts5 _ � � /- - {} ` ' �uJ /
xTc���� De � ' `�' "
/ /vs-T��u 5Env|��m�/C� �nou�D �EDu�e -. '| /
OUTDOOR PARKING REOu/RcNswT5. - ----_ «�, '
\ _ `-x7� ' /
/ ` - �-- --- `
/� � '� -- .. ' ` '� /
` / !�,,4TE _- / ____ 4. � �LP-9 , .
� / ' �` / -- � `/ / ` - ' /
� / / .-�z. ++�o� - - -- ``� � . / / '� ` '
' `- - -- - L � T/� +�as' � /
' 6���VE� ` --- -- / - - / r �� � -'
/ \ - -- -- ' ` /���� +1�O�
~ - -` ' O� \\�� �` -�.' ~ -- -_ / ��~� -- / B ^474' ./ ` � ' �
'' - \ - � -- --- -- ' ' ' �a] '�
� `` / ` ~ --- --- ' ' ' � ' � '' `
' . ` . . . _' - , . .. -._�....*.. . . � / ^ /
\ x^�� ' -- / -`�\ � / � --` / // / 7--- � �^--� ' f ' � \ � ^'�� '�' ' �
/ �p�sox/:��p v�0 ` `^�r� / / / / `��_ / ,' '' ---�_ // / ��� / - _,^,
�|^ �' «����:/ � \ �'`. '.''�.`' � ~/\j\i����^�w'U\/ / �
'
.
'14
| ) '' -' - i
\ / PuoL/c WATER)
` /
`EX15TIN- . (__ , \___ EXISTING TREES t
_�
p 0 a ,p_ . - I / I - , _"Z. - - - I GRAVEL - --- ,S--- I /
�, , .. -------�� — -_ _, I \ - - - - / \ __ - __ --- � 17 --- 0 ---
VIP , . __ - , / ___�� \ - - - __ __ - - I - - - / / / / I 11 5
_- . ll �D -11 - - /_ , - -.- I - -, ) / ; 11 I
) / .** / I/ / , / I \ I- -1 /__ _,_ __ __ - , __ , --- --------- __ � / / / / __ __ - - - / / - - - - - , - . - - __ - __ - __ - - I � / �__, / / 1-1 "I i I
! 1, .. /; / / __ I - - / -1/7 - J , I / / I - _11 I /
I .. . / I / 1. - __ - - - - - I . / / - - i - - - -, - I I / I I /i 481 __ - I /
I I/ .- . ,,--- 11 I i I - - - - __ __ - I // , / / 1 / __ __ __ 11 i - ,/" , / Z, 11 I - __ .;__ i
I : / __ __t______ I - / - __ - / ; / I/ I . I ,/ - - - - - / --I ,/ �, - - T
__ -171,l / __ _71 (�- I
/ . , I 1 +4�, . - .- - - - / I / - - __ __ /_ - - - - - - I/ -./I -, 1�_
I I — __ - - __ ____ I- 'I, I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THERE WILL
DISCHARGED FROM THE BUILDING AND
/ ' - / �s -- ' THERE W�LBE NO TOXIC OR ' / ~
1-1 ' ---^�~-// -HAZARDgUS MATERIAL STORED
D
AT
\ � ' _ - -__. - 7 THE SITE UNLESS SPECIFICPERMITS
'---- � JR EXEMPTIONS ARE GRANTED
' / / / / PURSUANT TOTHOSE ARTICLES.
/ . 7___ / / '
--
/ ' ----`_ / FA[1UTT[A4NEF�5��GNATU��E
/ � / ---_ ' �- --_ / ' /
_- - ''
` / . - / ` '' ' _ _ __ _ _ _- _ _/
' � ' / / .' _- -_ --
. / . / -' --�
\ / -- - '' / DATE
�� . 11 . -
`` /` \ / / - -__ / / / �\
\ -^ '
~ ��� -- -_- '' / '- .
' -� . ---_- ' - _ ' - / / '' / �
� . \ e" _ �----/ - () ~' '
/ - - «/ ° / .' / ' \
` / � ` �� / -_ -- _-' \
� / - _-- '^ - ` ' / // .' -__ -- -_ -- / /
- - ' �� � - � � /' ^' -- .`
~ . / ' '� - - \, `^ --`-_ / , / -9 -r � .~~- / ,` ' /
� \ ` ~' -- _ ., `- . / ' {7 v � '/
/ ��^, ----- - ' ~. ---- -- ~r'�(� '^'�j� / .' / `` /
� ` _- -_ ' / '' ` /
�.. . / '/ `_��- � -- . --`-`- -_ / ,' / '.'' / `^ /
/ - ^ _ - / / ``
''/ � / � /' `` ----�-�--- �� -- -- -- - -- / '' / '' -- -- -� -- -- / SYMBOLS: x��A ��
/' / ` ~��� / -- / '^ / ---- ~- ~�� � U �K���°���~��^
�n � \ 8 / , � �� -��=-- ' / / `` -- - ' � / / / / ~. / �� / -- -- / -^ �/ ~
�/ �� . 7 / ` ���, �� ^` / `. ----- / � / / / / / , / ~^- . \ Qy\
/ .' � / �^ �`` -- __ - / /
. � 1 ` -- . '
. ' \ / -- -- / /
\ ' --CSRAVEL ~- / `
� � | ' / 'GRAVEL ' ---- - '- ^_ -- -- -- -- -- -- -^� /
/ ' u�'^c / -_ -` sx|5T/NG r�ss5 , / '
\ ' --- - ve '' `` /
/ � - \ - VEGETATION �' / ^\
/ ' \ , � . _ I "IREMAIN THIS ��e� / /
' -`- / ^�� 7 ` ^~ / '
/ �- -. ' ,'-� 8» - -- � -,-~ , / /
T ^� � --- ,. ``` /
' ' \ "` / 6� - � - / �--- -' `�, \ / /
+� �� / . `` /` ' ` -_-- ~' /
\ ' \ ` ' `` --_ ' \ / / /
/ / -- -_�- ^�� � -' / /
\ . \ - l��' ~_ -_-_ _~ ' /
/ � � -- -- `` / ' /
\ ' ' i ---- \ /'' / /
\ / '. --_ --- -' / / / /
\ � \ / -- � ----- ` '- '' '' '' / \ / / /
\ � \ / Da�om�6 -�---���_ � '' ^ '''^/' / \ / / /
\ .' \ / ��s� � ' �� -____ _ -- '~ /' ', ' » '' ^' / \ / ' / /
� / ` ' - - --- ' ~' ' �� .' '- / / / /
\ J� ' / ` �/ / `--_ / � 0u/ / 1/1 .' /� '' J` _. / /K
5YM
DESCRIPTION
TC
TOP OF CURB
BC
BOTTOM OF CURB
TG
TOP OF GRATE
TL
TOP OF LID
IFIF
FINISHED FLOOR
R
RADIUS
EX
EX15TING
10.2
EX. ELEVATION
+10.0
NEW ELEVATION
\ '\ I / / . / . /
� / \4. � '' '~ / / / / /
. / \ �� ' / '' / ! /
� ' / \ DRAIN ' '' - ', '- / / / / /
/ _� ' / /
\ ` -1 I' / \ ^� / ^ -- -'` / / / ' /
' \ / -�-� / C� "�� ' , _ - - - - -- / /
' \ / - � +�Tf� �4�p / , ~ ~'-- -- \ ' / /
J� � \ / \� | / __ / / \ 0 / /c£/ -�' '/ // ' /'-'/' ' __-- \ / /� �� / / 8�~%��^�� ������_
/ ' --~_ /� ' �� / `� ~- \ � -� i4�� / / ���U U U��U � SITUATE- ����������T, NT
/V � � \ /' �5�- _/�' / \ -- ' / / // '/ / /' � ~ ~ / '��) /�� / /
`z � �| � �G���-�'`--- / \ \ / ' --` y~-�~-_ C, \J) / .� \ -----�~ / . - // / /� / / / .�� ^' \ / / / �� '
\ / �
I ,C
k.
I � \ I ; / , 7' R"A p7p c ., / ,/ ___ - / / z , -1 � / /
\ 11 t L . / -___ : , - .. .... .. . ��_ 1� / I I /
` . -'`` -- '
� ` ~ \
�' ~- ~`� / /
/ \ / �-- '
' / \ � .- '' `\ /
� / \ ' \l 11 \ /
� I �
\ \ \AREA 8
' / \ / /
\ �. \ . \ -- -_ -- -- _- '
/ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _\_ / / '
\ \ \ _____ . /
/ \ / /
\ �\ \ \
/ \ / .
\ �/\ ' \ \ . /
. / \ -- -- -_ __ _ / . .' /
\ ' \ ' \ ______ \ . e��-u /
� . / ~- _ _ _ _ \ / . / �r� � /
\ . \ _- -_ -- ' � \ / �� ' \ ' ' / /
/ ' \ ' '�� / ' / / /
\ / � \ '' \ � + -~ l ' / /
, ,' \ Em5T|m� / r/ ' / ' / / ' / /
` / �' \ \ \ ED6ED�mO0D5-,' r / \ / . / / / /
/ / \ ' \ �``� �' / -^'- \ ' /
' \ � ^�'~ _________ / / . / / . / /
� ' � \ / \ \ / ^' ~' ' +� 8' /
\'' ' ' `� -- ` \ / \ \ * `� // /�~' / / '' / ' / /
� '� -- \' ' \ \ '/ �'� / '' // / / .' / .'"�)� -`�� / /
& ' ` . � | � \ ' � / , /" wr �'' ' _~'~ «�`� / / ' , / Y� ^� /
t7 � � \ ` `` ' ' '� �^ / ' ' / / ' m� ' / �
\ \ ` \ \ �, / / / » " / " / /
\ / '! \ _ \ �' �----« - ' » » / /
Ili/ ' 76 -^ \ �. �^ ,- b , , / � /
\ /� \ rn «` � _� -- " \{\/� v \/ / / /
/ / �� `' \ ' `_� ' .~ " �___-_� ° ��~ ' / /
\ \ 7D �� ` � / / / . / /
co / ^' \ ` \ �` �: / \ Ex�T�� T��s� ^ / / / / /
\ / � \ -{ \ .' .� / ^-VEGETATION TO / / // ' / ' \ / /
\ .' / �� \ + �� y REMAIN IN THIS *Rs� y � / \ /
\ �� . / / \ m / �- / / / EDGE OF WOODS / / '�' / ` / /
�e�� ' / ' \ �� \ \ ' � ' / / \' . . - . ''� . '�, ,�'�T �,''{�^�`�7� '� � / / /
\
��������0 ____---- ___��' / ' ' / / � � |� �� �0 so
�11/ \ ------------- ---- � ��� U.����
P... J� .................... .- - . _� \ � --_____________ |� ��B����`--_____----�---~~_��'��� P
�����8�
I :
^__�_-�-�-»l�-°--�c�^�=.nL-_,__`___~___ \ ���________________�������_�_________ ________�__ , �� ���^ ,
�o_____~--- "�, - / �_�4"\�'4�~0 �^ \ � --------___-___---------- ��-----\�_�_��� ^ /
' �_� / ._________________ ________ _/
� � -_ ______ /
_______ �~_�� �--� _________________ _______-�_______ � '
-_____ __ -____ ____
1.2___
1f,3___
I____
LI
__
__ ___ ___
DONALD A. DENIS
P.O.Box GLS
'
RIVERHEAD
.
E R N Fc� [0 BU�L[D�HCc- SUPPLV
R � V, vd
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
COUNTY, NY
JOB NO: 9LO-4
DATE:: 11 JUNE 1991
REV
0
MAIN ROAD
BUILDING SUPPLY
t%
SCTMU 1000-41-1-1
1000--iL_-1-2.1
-:23 JUNE 1991 fis:dhs)
AQUEBOGUE, N.Y.
MAIN ROAD (RT.2r)
15:�[HR[FHMD (0'_—�cff3 V&1_13)[o
.
2L AUG. hil(SCHD)
3'-O„
MAX. SLOFE --
1/12
3/4" EXPANSION
JOINT
P. CO C. SIDEIIALK, SCORE
ICOR 5' O.C. JMARKS
1
VARIABLE SLOPES
(Ill IN.)
INCREASE AS
NECESSARY TO
ATTAIN 1/12 SLOPE
-0"
30', DRiVLlAY WIDTH ---
3/4" EXPANSION
JOINT
DRIVEWAY PLAN
1/8" = 1'-0"
DIMENSION "C" SEE TABLE DWG N0, T -I
SIDEWALK, CLASS F,
ITEM 10608.OiO3
-IDEW L.K '�11DT
TO MA CH EXISTING
CURB
SNOW STORAGE STRIP
(MATCH EXISTING WIDTH)
GRASS STRIP -
CONCK--ETE --
C,ARB. TYPE A
'ITEM 11_.0'128011
1/2" = 1'-0"
5'-O"(t)* SIDEWALK I OFFSET STRIP
*(MATCH EXISTING WIDTH) 3'-0" DESIRABLE
1/4" PER FT. (MIN PITCH) —_
v ITEM 608 0101(4')
ITEM 2031
SIDEWALK SECTION
1.'2" _ , -O"
CURB/PAVING
TRAFFIC BEARING ASPHALT DRIVEWAYS It PARKING AREAS
NYS D.O.T. (MEET ALL TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SPECIFICATIONS)
4' MIN.
I VARIES
I
ITEM 164031'3 1 1/2" TOP
P.CONC.
1 CURB
SAL C'JT 1 GRADE
E\ISTING PAVING W
9� e NOTE. THE END OF CURE
----- �_-- c� NOT ABUTTING EXISTING
OF TRAVEL LANL —�'
-- ___-- CURB SHALL BE RAMPED
DOWN TO 7ERO HEIGHT
ITEM 18014031335 1/2" ENDER ca REVEAL INTHE LAST
10 A' LO_,- I IONS
G
------ F, FACINTRAFFIC.
TEM 41311 5 1/2" EASE
! 1 ITEM 1069.2801
ITEM 11304 ICII A O E E -�
CURB INLET BOX
NYS D.O.T.
T t PE NI^ "FRAM
(U,TH NON-MOUNTAE_E C1:RE EOX)
I
I
1
I
i
I
i,
( `EEL RE' CI ',NE ESR O,R:.TE j
ITEM 655 05
' I I
�I
I
CURB BOX
(NJN-MOUNTAELE)
ITEM 655.05
DRAINAGE RING (TYP)
P CONC
I 1\2" NYS TYPE ` CURB
IA MIX GRADE
2 1/2" COMPACTED'
BITUMINOUS MIX I k
i
COMPACTED
BAS7-
NOTE: DRAINAGE PIPE
I COVER/ GRATE FROM DOw'NSPOUTS TO
TO GRADE OR DRAINAGE RINGS TO BE
( BuRIED CONCRETE 6" PVC PIPING(SDR-35).
!'-C" TO COVER (SEE PLAN) DRAINAGE P:PE
2'-0" PRECAST CONNECTING DRAINAGE
COLLr R CsRAE,E K!N`.;S iN PAVED AREAS
SHALL 6E 12"(� CORR.
i POLYETH r LENS PIPE.
1• - TRAFFIC
BEARING,
,i
SLAB
tt� cl- 3-O„
i
PRECAST
DRAINAGE
RINGS
I
I.
i
„ F
•�- ------------------
CL ARANO
�I SEt_ECT s�
' ,... GRANULAR FILL � _I
ca 5.+.:W.. GROUND Wt; T EK'
---4------------------------------L--------------
DRAINAGE SCHEDULE:
E1iT IYt'0LE `:
IN Q' IATION FROM:
McDO.ALD GEOSCIENCE
SOUTHOLD. NY
�— EL +"48.5'
0 �.
DARK BR OW14
l' SILTY LOAM (OL)
BROWN LOAMY
SILT (ML)
BROWN FINE TO
COARSE SAND (SW)
WATER
WATER IN BROWN
FINE TO COARSE
SAND (SW)
LIGHTING F XTUPE SCHEDULE:
P05T MOU14TED Il5W METAL HALIDE FIXTURE,
"SENTRY" MODEL NO. SUB-NLIIS-MH OR APPROVED
EQUAL, "COLONIAL -TYPE" , BLACK FINISH,
MOUNTED ON L "x L" x 12'-0' HIGH WOOD
POST. CH-..•MFER CORNERS, SHIELD FROM
ADJACENT PROPERTIES
0 GROUND I-OUNTED ISOW FLOOD
(DUPLEX r -.S INDICATED)
-¢ RECE55EV SOFFIT FIXTURE
N.,
I
1
1' I
RJAD � I
�HO'.iLDER'
I
I
u'Ui .
'�� �L ! ? Krt-~!I� l.'�' ��'L �\ i !IVU J
ARE "
DESCR'.PTION
AREA
(S`� T)
2" RAIN
5'-O"(t)* SIDEWALK
DRIVEWAY
FULL
HEIGHT---,
NORMAL SIDEWALK
*(MATCH EXISTING WIDTH)
FT
66 1
CURB71..
y
(1) 6 x 8'-6'° DEEP D >~'tinGL RING
ELEVATION
2
EAST DRIVE t PARKING 8180 S.F.
R0Jt -RETAIL (EAST) 4x18 S F
12,886 S.F.
In6 FT.
'f—
/
(8) 10'4 x 6'-6" DEEP DRAINAGE RINGS
1/4" PER FT.
N_--RTH PARKING AREA
851: S.F.166
3/4 PFK'
---=---------
FT
-- - ---------------
1438 C F.
4
tt EST DRIVE t FAR,.IN :; 97135 S.F.
ROOF -RETAIL (wE-ST) 3928 S F
13,On,, S F.
166 FT.
2168 C.F
(8) IC's x 6'-6" DEEP DRAINAGE RINGS
222h C F
5
(EST ENTRANCE D iV
840 S.F
Ion FT.
7186 C F
DRAIn.
(1) 84 x 4'-0" DEEP NA(:,E= RiN':�
169 C.F.
L
ROCF-WAREHOu`E t --ST,
21,562 S F
166 FT
3519 C F
(8) 10'¢ x 1'-0" GEE" DRAINAGE RINGS
3636 C.F
O
ROOF -WAREHOUSE (E,=ST)
:1,562 S.F.166
FT.
MIN. SLOPE=
1/4" PER FT. WIRE FABRIC ITEM 10608.0103
DRIVEWAY
SCORE
I
MARK
15-18"
CURB SECTION
I I
890 C.F.
NOTE: THE
FIRST FULL 5' FLAG OF SIDEWALK
GROUND COVER
-0"
I
TO EITHER
SIDE OF DRIVEWAY SHALL BE C THICK,
ALL DR>, NAGE RINGS '-,HALL HAVE ,= TR, FFIC BEARING TOP SLAB AND A CAST IRON COVER
0R C, RA, TE SET :'�T THE SPEc_IFIED ELE`,i =,T10, N DR,41NAGE RINGS SHALL BE CONNECTED
AS SHOiwN �_. T H 12''+ CO R, RUCli .TED POLYETHYL=NE: PiFE- .
--- -
f
WIRE FABRIC
REINFORCED ITEM 10 08 0103
DRIVEWAY SECTION
SNOW STORAGE STRIP
(MATCH EXISTING WIDTH)
GRASS STRIP -
CONCK--ETE --
C,ARB. TYPE A
'ITEM 11_.0'128011
1/2" = 1'-0"
5'-O"(t)* SIDEWALK I OFFSET STRIP
*(MATCH EXISTING WIDTH) 3'-0" DESIRABLE
1/4" PER FT. (MIN PITCH) —_
v ITEM 608 0101(4')
ITEM 2031
SIDEWALK SECTION
1.'2" _ , -O"
CURB/PAVING
TRAFFIC BEARING ASPHALT DRIVEWAYS It PARKING AREAS
NYS D.O.T. (MEET ALL TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SPECIFICATIONS)
4' MIN.
I VARIES
I
ITEM 164031'3 1 1/2" TOP
P.CONC.
1 CURB
SAL C'JT 1 GRADE
E\ISTING PAVING W
9� e NOTE. THE END OF CURE
----- �_-- c� NOT ABUTTING EXISTING
OF TRAVEL LANL —�'
-- ___-- CURB SHALL BE RAMPED
DOWN TO 7ERO HEIGHT
ITEM 18014031335 1/2" ENDER ca REVEAL INTHE LAST
10 A' LO_,- I IONS
G
------ F, FACINTRAFFIC.
TEM 41311 5 1/2" EASE
! 1 ITEM 1069.2801
ITEM 11304 ICII A O E E -�
CURB INLET BOX
NYS D.O.T.
T t PE NI^ "FRAM
(U,TH NON-MOUNTAE_E C1:RE EOX)
I
I
1
I
i
I
i,
( `EEL RE' CI ',NE ESR O,R:.TE j
ITEM 655 05
' I I
�I
I
CURB BOX
(NJN-MOUNTAELE)
ITEM 655.05
DRAINAGE RING (TYP)
P CONC
I 1\2" NYS TYPE ` CURB
IA MIX GRADE
2 1/2" COMPACTED'
BITUMINOUS MIX I k
i
COMPACTED
BAS7-
NOTE: DRAINAGE PIPE
I COVER/ GRATE FROM DOw'NSPOUTS TO
TO GRADE OR DRAINAGE RINGS TO BE
( BuRIED CONCRETE 6" PVC PIPING(SDR-35).
!'-C" TO COVER (SEE PLAN) DRAINAGE P:PE
2'-0" PRECAST CONNECTING DRAINAGE
COLLr R CsRAE,E K!N`.;S iN PAVED AREAS
SHALL 6E 12"(� CORR.
i POLYETH r LENS PIPE.
1• - TRAFFIC
BEARING,
,i
SLAB
tt� cl- 3-O„
i
PRECAST
DRAINAGE
RINGS
I
I.
i
„ F
•�- ------------------
CL ARANO
�I SEt_ECT s�
' ,... GRANULAR FILL � _I
ca 5.+.:W.. GROUND Wt; T EK'
---4------------------------------L--------------
DRAINAGE SCHEDULE:
E1iT IYt'0LE `:
IN Q' IATION FROM:
McDO.ALD GEOSCIENCE
SOUTHOLD. NY
�— EL +"48.5'
0 �.
DARK BR OW14
l' SILTY LOAM (OL)
BROWN LOAMY
SILT (ML)
BROWN FINE TO
COARSE SAND (SW)
WATER
WATER IN BROWN
FINE TO COARSE
SAND (SW)
LIGHTING F XTUPE SCHEDULE:
P05T MOU14TED Il5W METAL HALIDE FIXTURE,
"SENTRY" MODEL NO. SUB-NLIIS-MH OR APPROVED
EQUAL, "COLONIAL -TYPE" , BLACK FINISH,
MOUNTED ON L "x L" x 12'-0' HIGH WOOD
POST. CH-..•MFER CORNERS, SHIELD FROM
ADJACENT PROPERTIES
0 GROUND I-OUNTED ISOW FLOOD
(DUPLEX r -.S INDICATED)
-¢ RECE55EV SOFFIT FIXTURE
N.,
I
1
1' I
RJAD � I
�HO'.iLDER'
I
I
u'Ui .
'�� �L ! ? Krt-~!I� l.'�' ��'L �\ i !IVU J
ARE "
DESCR'.PTION
AREA
(S`� T)
2" RAIN
VOLUME
I`L^ u �,L:,l
_!J FT )
DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
VOLUME
PR,' VI✓Fr.
(CU FT.)
I
EAST ENTRANCE DRIVE
14 C-3 F
FT
66 1
.,
�32 C F
y
(1) 6 x 8'-6'° DEEP D >~'tinGL RING
t33 C F
2
EAST DRIVE t PARKING 8180 S.F.
R0Jt -RETAIL (EAST) 4x18 S F
12,886 S.F.
In6 FT.
2134 C F
(8) 10'4 x 6'-6" DEEP DRAINAGE RINGS
222, C F
3
N_--RTH PARKING AREA
851: S.F.166
FT.
1423 C.F.
(3) 10'� x T-0" DEEP DRAINAGE RINGS
1438 C F.
4
tt EST DRIVE t FAR,.IN :; 97135 S.F.
ROOF -RETAIL (wE-ST) 3928 S F
13,On,, S F.
166 FT.
2168 C.F
(8) IC's x 6'-6" DEEP DRAINAGE RINGS
222h C F
5
(EST ENTRANCE D iV
840 S.F
Ion FT.
7186 C F
DRAIn.
(1) 84 x 4'-0" DEEP NA(:,E= RiN':�
169 C.F.
L
ROCF-WAREHOu`E t --ST,
21,562 S F
166 FT
3519 C F
(8) 10'¢ x 1'-0" GEE" DRAINAGE RINGS
3636 C.F
O
ROOF -WAREHOUSE (E,=ST)
:1,562 S.F.166
FT.
3819 C.F.
(8) 10'w k T-0" DEEP DRAINAGE FLINGS
383b C.F.
8
SOUTH AREA
15-18"
S
(2) IC'v x 6'-6" DEEP DRANA ;-: RINGS
890 C.F.
PACHYSANDRA TERM.
I FLATS
GROUND COVER
ALL DR>, NAGE RINGS '-,HALL HAVE ,= TR, FFIC BEARING TOP SLAB AND A CAST IRON COVER
0R C, RA, TE SET :'�T THE SPEc_IFIED ELE`,i =,T10, N DR,41NAGE RINGS SHALL BE CONNECTED
AS SHOiwN �_. T H 12''+ CO R, RUCli .TED POLYETHYL=NE: PiFE- .
joc:s:
4"w'°. ggD
SAI�I`Iyr°; Y C ,LCULP'-MONS:
Gt!'M SONE IV, YIELD. 600 GPD FER ACRE
COMMUN'iTY WATER SUPFLY IS PROVIDED BY GREENPORT WATER AUTHORITY
YIELD= 600 GPD/ACRE
PERMITTED DENSITY = 5.938 ACRES x 600 GPD/ACRE _ ;,562.6 GPD
DRY STORE FLOW: 0.03 GPD PER S F. OF GROSS FLOOR AREA
QTY.
NON-MEDICAL OFFICE SPACE: 06 GPD PER S.F. GROSS FLOOR AREA
BOTANICAL NAME
t.�AREHOUSE SPACE: 04 GPD PER S.F. GROSS FLOOR AREA
NOTES
PROPOSED BUILDING: DRY STORE-- 8350 S.F.
1
NON-MEDICAL OFFICE USE- 450 S.F.
ACER SACCHARUM
WAREHOUSE USE-- 41,625 S.F.
BtB
FLOW (PEI` SUFFOLK 8350 S.F. x 0.03 GPD PER S.F. =
250.5 GPD
COUNTY DEPT. OF 450 S.F. x 06 GPD PER S.F. =
2-1 GPD
HEALTH DEFINITIONS 41,'25 S.F. x .04 GPD PER S.F. =
1665 GFD
OF "USE") TOTAL PROPOSED FLOW = 1942.5 GPD
I
PROPOSED DENSITY: 1942.5 C -PD / 5.938 ACRES = 3271.1 GPD/ACRE
BETULA POPULIFOLIA
SANITARY SYSTEM:
CLUMPS
SEPTIC TANK,
O
SEPTIC TANK L"/ (2) DAY FLOW): 1942.5 GPD x 2 DAYS = 3885 GAL.
T5UGA CANADENS15
USE 4000 GAL. SEPTIC TANK- (2) 10'-0" C' x 5'-0" DEEP RINGS
LEACHING: FOOLS:
44
SANITARY FLOW: 1942.5 GPD
JUNIPERU5 VIRGINIANA
LEACHING RATE: 1.5 GAL./S.F./DAY
SIDEWALL AREA REQUIRED: 1942.5 GFD DIVIDED BY 1 5 GAL/S.F./DAY =
1295 S.F.
SIDEWALL AREA PROVIDED: (10) 10'-O"' X 4' 6" DEEP POOLS = 141:, S.F.
_d
JUNIPERU5 CONFERTA
USE (10) 10`0"d x 4'-6" DEEP POOLS w/ TRAFFIC BEARING DOMESC.I.
COVERS
I' MIN./2' MAX. 8" TRAFFIC LID
COLLAR HEIGhT
fl ITi
INLET -IX = FLOW LINE
MIN. PIT C.+H I,� E
PER 1 I yl
v vl
CAST IRON
_COVERS
F.CONC
COLLAR
TRAFFIC
BEARING DOME
y = OUTLET ',IN
_T_ ---=rte y 7 L` �' -FTF`,
:w_ -j MIN. PITCH 1/8"
PER I'
(3; e"GPIF E
(20
SEPTIC TANK
[� [''
L A _, '
"(,."1:N TO C 1 C0V1_R "4 ^0 PIF'c .
"(MA\: -TO GRADE I 8' FSR i' -_ s\-,I.00VER AT GRADE
EL + y (TYr-.) MIN PITCH EL +46.5
4"(Z CLASS
2400 PIPs— - T -77--K-r
-4
P.00NC
r -
i
4" PER I' !INS ERT �`L +45.2 �EL C E
MIN. F!TCH EL +4_�-moi -- , _!� ---- ---- V — < DON
SLA6
t
i- -- - ---
L +c4 8
r _ LP-Id2 I LP -3 c
<r� I 18"DROP T�' e. 71.8.9,10
- EL *40 3'
c�►-------------------- REO' _CLEARAN= - ---L6----------
♦ -
-`-i
- ----------------- i------i-N_�----- R --- ----- 1 +- ---L---------
DRf,INAGE RINGS
SANITARY SYSTEM W'' F=c DOME
LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE:
REF.it
QTY.
COMMON NAME
BOTANICAL NAME
5iZE
NOTES
M
1
SUGAR MAPLE
ACER SACCHARUM
2 1/2" CAL.
BtB
P
O
BRADFORD PEAR
PYRUS CALLERYANA
2" CAL.
BtB
B
I
GRAY BIRCH
BETULA POPULIFOLIA
8'-10'
CLUMPS
H
O
CANADIAN HEMLOCK
T5UGA CANADENS15
L' HIGH
C
44
EASTERN RED CEDAR
JUNIPERU5 VIRGINIANA
C HIGH
J
13
SHORE JUNIPER
JUNIPERU5 CONFERTA
15-18"
GROUND COVER
Y
18
AMERICAN YEW
TAXUS CANEDEN515
15-18"
A
O
PINK AZALEA
RHODODENDRON SPP
I5-18"
Z
11
RED AZALEA
RHODODENDRON SPP
15-18"
S
0
SPURGE
PACHYSANDRA TERM.
I FLATS
GROUND COVER
LOCALE: Dk/- i ii4G INFO
-
n SCALE: I" = 20'_0"
ToLiN OF 'GUTHOLD JOB No: IL04
u'FF0LK CGU: NTY, PAY
5uTi I;. 1700 r;p-i--I FAL: V.: 2 ,.i::: I'i ; i (::,.::,.;;a
Ivii
DRAWING NO.
S2
OF 52
1,,. v„ 1�, 3`ti,