Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCARDINALE, ALAN (2) TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Henry P. Smith, Vice President Albert J. Kmpski, Jr. John L. Bednoski, Jr. John B. Tuthill Telephone (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 .. Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 January 28, 1991 Mr. John Holzapfe!, Chairman Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Holzapfel: Transmitted herewith is application No. p/o 122-3-14 Lot %1 for a wetland application submitted by John Geideman on behalf of Alan Cardinale. Please note that this property is not subdivided and we will not grant any approvals until such time that it is given the proper Planning Boardapprovals. Please prepare a written report of findings and recommendations with respect to this application. Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB: jt TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, IlI~ President Henry P. Smith, Vice President Albert J. Kmpski, Jr, John L. Bednoski, Jr. John B. Tuthill Telephone (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ScoTr L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE TOWN TRUSTEES, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK, FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT PURSUANT TO THE LAWS, ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING TIlE COASTAL AND INTERIOR WETLANDS, FLOOD PLAINS AND DRAINAGE AREAS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN, AND THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 32 OF TIlE CODE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. APPLICATION NO. APPLICANT' S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: AGENT: ~/;~/~ C'~c°/~c~/-;9~:7/~' /~.~ AGENT ~DRESS: ~. ~ ~/~ PE~IT REQUESTED TO: ~O~J~UC~ LOCATION OF PRopERTY FOR REQUESTED PERMIT: TowN: o Id " TAX MAP NO: 1000- ~/-j ~ /2~g?B- CREEK, BAY OR HARBOR FRONTING PROPERTY: ~/~/~g SIZE 0F PROPOSED WORK: WIDTH: · ~ A~ Page YDS. TO BE EXCAVATED: ~-y~.~ YDS. TO BE FILLED: MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED: WIDTH OF CANAL, CREEK OR BAY FRONTING PROPERTY: DEPTH AT LOW TIKE: AVER. RISE IN TIDE: DISTANCE TO NEAREST CHANNEL: 2-~~ DISTANCE PROJECT EXTENDS BEYOND SIMILAR PROJECTS IN AREA: AREA ZONINg: PROJECT FOR RIVAT SE: DESCRIBE KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON PREMISES: HAS ANY PRIOR LICENSE OR PERMIT BEEN ISSUED TO ERECT STRUCTURES, DREDGE, OR DEPOSIT FILL ON SAID PREMISES: ~ HAS ANY LICENSE OR PERMIT EVER BEEN REVOKED OR SUSPENDED BY A GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY: '~-~D DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION OF PROPERTY: DESCRIBE PROPOSED CONDITION OF PROPERTY AFTER WORK IS COMPLETED. AN ADDITIONAL SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITE IF NECESSARY: INCLUDE ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED WHICH WOULD PROHIBIT THIS PROJECT: ~ WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER IF NOT THE SAME AS APPLICANT: .... '" '~l "PR~JECTI. NUMBER 617.21 Appendfx C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only SEQR PART I~PROJECT INFORMATION (To ~3e completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) I 2. PROJECT NAME Municipality - ~~r :~-,.~.4~1 County 5. iS PROPOSED ACTION: [] Expansion [] Modification/alteration 7. AMOUNT CF LAND AFFECTED; Initially acres Ultimately acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? ~Yes [] No If NO, describe briefly g. WHAT IS PRESENT LA~;D US~ IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? ~Reside~tial [] !ndu~trial [] Commercial [] Agriculture [] Park/Forest/Open space Describe: [] Other 10. DOES ACTION iNVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL. OR FUNDING,.NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? ' [~ Yes ~o If ye~, list agency(s) and perrnit/approva[s " DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTIOt~ HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ~t'~o If yes, list agency r~ame and permit/approval Yes 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION~ [] Yes [] No I CERTIFY THAT?HE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE the action is in the Coastal Area. and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER · ,a,~ ~ ~,--~:NViRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (To be cornpIeted by Agenc~)~ . A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY . ~ THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.127 It ye. ~ordinate the review proces~ and use the RUL~ [~.F '~' - [] Yes [] No ' WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.67 If NO. a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, if legible) Cl. Existing air quality, surface or groundwate£ quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: : C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or tbreateneg or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a cha~ge in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain briefly. C$. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1-057 Explain briefly. C7. Other imbacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. O. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? [] Yes [] NO If Yes, explain briefly PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE 0'O be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude, if necessary, add attschmeats or reference supperting materials. Ensure thst explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts bare been identified and adequately addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. [] Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and snalysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: Civil Marine JOHN H. GEIDEMAN Consulting ~ngineer (516] 477-2421 P.O. Box 416 E. Marion. L.I New York 11939 To ~_:hom Tb May Concern, ~John H. Geideman Co eo~stPuct a on my property at COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) STATE OF NEW YORK ) BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND SAYS THAT HE tS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS, AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MAIqNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BEAPPROVED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT, IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE, TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS EXAMINED BY ~NOTARY 'PUBLIC LfNDA J. COOPER N~sr.' Pubt.~c, S~a~.e of N~ York APPROVED DISAPPROVED CONDITIONS (If any) SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN COMPUTATION OF FEES Approved 2/27/85 Telephone (516) 765-1801 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL To: From i Dated: Re: Southold Town Trustees Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council February 13, 1991 Recommendation of Wetland Applications The following recommendations were made by the Council at its meeting held Thrusday, February 7, 1991: On a motion by Stephen Angell, seconded by Margaret Feeney, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval with limitations on Wetland Application No. 111 - I of Thomas Samuels to maintenance dredge a channel 30_+~ x 1440+' to maximum depth 6' below MLW with spoil to be used as beach nourishment on southwest side of Fisherman's Beach. The CAC approves if the dredging depth is limited to 4'. The Council feels that 6' is too big, 4' is adequate for most pleasure crafts in the area and the Council is concerned that the 6' depth would create potholes and problems to the surrounding water and shellfish. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. Application No. 12-2-90-78-5-16 of James Grathwohl was tabled pending receipt of the landscape plan, buffer zone and placement of a retaining wall as requested by the Board of Trustees. On a motion by Stephen Angell, seconded by Bruce Loucka, it was RESOVLED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval with su~tc, lestions of Wetland Application No. 12-4-90-123-10-1 of Panagiotis Gazouleas to construct a single family dwelling, attached decking and associated sanitary system. Construct a 4' x 30' fixed dock, 3' x 10' ramp and 6' x 20' float. The Council approves the house as submitted with the stipulation that the applicant follow the checklist the CAC submitted to the Trustees 'n a letter dated February 9, 1990 which requires roof gutters and drainpipes, no runoff by grading, straw bales during construction, no plantiog requiring fertilization and heavy watering within 75' of wetlands, etc. The Council approves the dock with the suggestion that the two floats be turned 90° to plan so it would be in line with the last adjacent dock. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion by John Holzapfel, seconded by Cynthia Sturner, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval with stipulations of Wetland Application No. 24-2-11 to remove existing dilapidated docking facility and replace in-kind, in-place, a 4' x 28' fixed timber dock, 3' x 16' aluminum ramp, 6' x 20' float dock and two 2-pile float support dolphins. The Council approves provided the proiect does not interfere with the adjacent Page 2 ~ neighbors navigation and dock. Vote of Council: Ayes: All On a motion by Bruce Loucka, seconded by Cynthia Sturner, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustess disapproval of Wetland Application No. 50-3-6 of James Bitses to construct a small flood control gate; small semi-circular berm penetrated by a four inch pipe with gate valve , six feet in diameter and two feet high. The Council recommends disapproval until an engineers report is submitted to determine the results of 2", 3" etc. of rain (will it flood the road?). Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion by Stephen Ang~ell, seconded by Margaret Feeney, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval of Wetland Application No. 111-1-16 by Frank Curran to replace (within 18" 101 I.f. of existing timber bulkhead, install one 10" mooring pile and dredge a 21' x 25' boat basin to 4' below MLW. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried, On a motion by John Holzapfel, seconded by Bruce Loucka, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval of Wetland Application No. 116-6-24 submitted by Kinogenor Point Company to replace (within 18) 135+ l.f. of existing bulkhead. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried, On a motion by Stephen AngeH, seconded by Cynthia Sturner, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval with suggestions of Wetland Application No. p/o 122-3-14[Iot I) of Alan Cardinale to construct a catwalk, platform, ramp and float to piles. The Council suggests the applicant extend the catwalk and send the ramp from the catwalk to float and eliminate the stairs. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion by Stephen Angetl, seconded by John Holzapfel, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval with suggestions of Wetland Application No. p/o 122-3-18 (Lot 2) of Alan Cardinaie to construct a catwalk, platform, ramp and float to piles. The Council suggests the applicant extend the catwalk and send the ramp from the catwalk to float and eliminate the stairs. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. Application No. p/o 122-3-14 (Lot 3) was tabled pending further information from enwronmental experts concerning the length of catwalks over wetlands. On a motion by Margaret Feeney, seconded by John Holzapfel, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees disapproval of Wetland Application No. 126-9-p/o19, 26.2 and 26.3 of Mark and Lisa Davis toconstruct a single family dwelling with garage and driveway. The Council feels this should not be subdivided, it is not a buildable lot. The Council recommends denial because of environmental concerns and to uphold zoning, Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried.