Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CAMPBELL, KIM
TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Henry P. Smith. Vice President Albert J. Kmpski. Jr. John L. Bednoski. Jr. John B. Tuthill Telephone (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF T~)WN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 1, 199t-~ ~ SCOTt L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 SouthoM. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 James Volney Righter 58 Winter Street Boston, Massachusetts 02108 RE: Kim K. Campbell Dear Mr. Righter: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Board of Trustees on Thursday, January 17, 1991: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Trustees approve the report of consultant, Bruce Anderson dated January 5, 1991 and waive the~contours requesting ~' con~ours. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB: jmt cc: ZBA Bruce Anderson TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Henry P. Smith, Vice President Albert J. Krupski, Jr. John L. Bednoski, Jr. John B. Tuthill SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 BOARD OF TOW~~ Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1892 TOWN OF S(~~ ~%~? ~ [~ Telephone (516) 765-1800 , C I 1990 APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE TOWN~T~uk~'~ - ~%~C~~UTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YO~, FOR EE ISSU~CE OF ~~~T TO EE ~WS, ORDINECES ~D REGU~TIONS GOVE~ING ~ COASTAL ~ INT~IOR ~T~DS, FLOOD PLAINS ~D D~INAGE ~E~ OF SOUTHO~ TO~, ~D EE ISSU~CE OF PE~ITS PURSUIT TO C~PTE 32 OF THE CODE OF EE TO~ OF SO.HOLD. APPLICANT'S NAME: ~$ ~OI~G~G~4%V~-~ LL~:. TEL. NO.(~%~.&~'l-gT~ MAILING ~DRESS: 5~ ~ ~. ~oS~ ~ ~ZlO~ AGE~: ~e ~ ~ TEL NO. AGENT ADDRESS: PERMIT REQUESTED TO: ~ ~ ~uz- ~ ~6~.~-~.~ LOCATION OF PROPERTY FOR REQUESTED PERMIT: TowN: TAX MAP NO: 1000- OO~ · ~' I~ CREEK, BAY OR HARBOR FRONTING PROPERTY: SIZE OF PROPOSED WORK: YDS. TO BE EXCAVATED: YDS. TO BE FILLED: MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED: WIDTH OF CANAL, CREEK OR BAY FRONTING PROPERTY:~$~. DEPTH AT LOW TI~E: M.~, AVER. RISE IN TIDE: DISTANCE TO NEAREST CHANNEL: ~ ~ DISTANCE PROJECT EXTENDS BEYOND SIMILAR PROJECTS IN AREA: AREA ZONING: -~ -IS PROJECT FOR PRIVATE OR BUS. INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY: ~{'a'*'~ DESCRIBE KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON PREMISES: HAS ANY PRIOR LICENSE OR PERMIT BEEN ISSUED TO ERECT STRUCTURES, DREDGE, OR DEPOSIT FILL ON SAID PREMISES: A~ '4-~ ~ ~ ~%~ 9 .~%~,:~9~ HAS ANY LICENSE OR PERMIT EVER BEEN REVOKED OR SUSPENDED BY A GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY: DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION OF PROPERTY: DESCRIBE PROPOSED CONDITION OF PROPERTY AFTER WORK IS COMPLETED. INCLUDE ~ll AN ADDITIONAL SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITE IF NECESSARY: ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED WHICH WOULD PROHIBIT THIS PROJECT: WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER IF NOT THE SANE AS APPLICANT: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) STARE OF BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND SAYS THAT HE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS, AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BEAPPROVED BY THE TO~ BOA-RD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ~ND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT, IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE, TO ENTERONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. swoRM TO BEFO= ME THIS TARY PUBLIC DAY OF ~~ , 19 ~0 EXAMINED BY APPROVED DISAPPROVED CONDITIONS (If any) SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN COMPUTATION OF FEES Approved 2/27/85 I PROJECT D NUMBER ~/"-~ 61721 ~ ~ ~. ~,~'~ ? ...... SEQR - Appendix C ': :.: - State Environmental Quality ~e~;i~w c~cq'.~ [ ~ ' '~ SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASS E~F6RM ~.} PART I--PRO~ECT INFORMATION ~o be complete~ by APplicant or Project sponsor) ~~;'~ 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street Address and road inte~sectiezls, prominent landmarks, etc.. or provide map) 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: --~ New [] Exgansfon [] Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: ?. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially acres Ultimately acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? ~. WHAT IS ~SESENT LA~,D U~E IN WC~N~TY OF PROJECT ~Residential [] ]ndu~trial [] Commercial [] Agriculture [] Park/Forest/Open space [] Other . Describe: 10. DOES ACTION iNVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, ~ Yes [] No If yes, list agency(s) end permit/approvals - 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACT[ON HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ~Yes ~ No If yea, I~$1 agency name and permit/approval ~iE .C. ' ~ ~ ~ 12. AS A RESULT OF PRESSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? ~ CS~T[F~ T,~T THS ~N~O~AT~ON PROW~ A~OV~ ~S T~U~ TO TH~ ~ST OF UY ~NOWL~ Applicant/sponsor name: If the action is in the Coostal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER PART II--ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYr~ ~THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 6iT. t2? If yes, .~inate the review process and use the EULL [] Yes [] No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.87 If No, a negative declaration may be superseded by another involyed agency. C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be har~dwrinen, it legible) Cl. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste produ?Jon or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or ?ommunity or neighborhood character Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, sheiiffsh or wi d[ife spec es, significant habitats, or ~;hreatened or endangered SbeCies? Explain briefly: D. IS THERE. OR IS THERE LIKELY TO SE. CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENT[AL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL ~MPACTS? [] Yes [] NO If Yes. exolam 9rle[~y PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANC.~ (To be completed by Agdncy)' INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above· determine whether it is substantial, large/important or otherwise significant. Each effect ShOUld De assessed in connecuoo with its (a} setting (i.e. urban or rural); (bi probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibilJty; (e) geographic scope; and (fi magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or refererlce support[ag materials. Ensure that explanauons con[am sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAr and/or prepare a positive declaration. [] Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND ~rovide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Ooehringer, Chairman Charles Gfigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. Joseph H. Sawick'l James Dinizio. Jr. Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hail. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516] 765-1823 TOWN OF Appeal No. 3967: Application of KIM CAMPBELL. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-33 as disapproved, for permission to locate accessory building in an area other than the required rear yard. Location of Property: East End Road, Fishers Island, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 004, Block 004, Lot 016. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on September 26, 1990 all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: i. The premises in question is located along a private right-of-way off Orientale Avenue at Fishers Island, Town of Southold, and is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1GOO, Section 4~ Block 4, Lot 16. Page 2 - Appi. No. 3967 Matter of KIM CAMPBELL Decision Rendered October 17, 1990 2. The subject premises contains a total lot area of 4.34+- acres and is improved with a dwelling and structures as shown on the May 18, 1987 survey prepared by Chandler, Palmer & King (and updated March 26, 1990). 3. By this application, appellant proposes to locate a 26 ft. by 24 ft. accessory garage structure in the yard area facing the private road, which technically is the front yard area. The subject building is proposed for those accessory uses specifically permitted in the zoning code for this R-120 Zone District and at a height not to exceed 16 feet to the ridge (proposed). (See copies of construction plan sketch prepared by James Volney Righter, Architects dated March 16, 1990 for building data.; 4. Article III, Section 100-33 (referred from Article III-A, Section 100-30A.4) of the Zoning Code allows accessory buildings to be located in the required rear yard area, but does not provide for accessory buildings to be located in any other yard area. 5. In considering this application, the Board finds and determines: (a) that the circumstances of this application are uniquely related to the land; (b) that there is no other method for appellants to pursue; and placing the structure in any other location on the premises would require other variance relief; (c) that the area chosen for the accessory structure is not unreasonably located, being 445+- feet from the private road and 55 or more feet from the edge of the marsh; (d) that the variance will not in turn cause a substantial effect on the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience and/or order of the Town; (e) that precedents have been established in area waterfront communities for the same or similar placement of accessory buildings in a yard area different than the seaward areas of the dwellings; Page 3 - Appl. No. 3967 Matter of KIM CAMPBELL Decision Rendered October 17, 1990 (f) that in carefully considering the record and all the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by granting the variance, as applied and conditionally noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT a Variance in the Matter of the - Application of KIM CAMPBELL as applied under Appeal No. 3967 for the placement of an accessory garage/storage building in the front yard area (as described in the above Findings), SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. That the accessory building be located as requested (445+- feet from the private road and 55 or more feet from the nearest marsh area); 2. That the accessory building not exceed the proposed height at 16 feet from grade; 3. That the subject accessory building not be used for habitable, sleeping or business purposes; 4. That the size of the building not exceed 20 feet by 25 feet at any time; 5. Ail other provisions of the Code as pertain to accessory uses and accessory buildings for this Zone District (such as storage and garage uses). Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Doyen, and Dinizio. (Member Sawicki was absent.) This resolution was duly adopted. lk GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. Joseph H. Sawicki James Dinizio, Jr. Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L~ HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (5 ~6) 765-1800 Memo for the File Matter of Appl. No. 3967 - Kim Campbell 9/17/90 Called Mr. Albert of James Righter Architect's Office to urge that he check with Town Trustees as to their jurisdiction since garage is shown to be 55+- feet from the marsh shown on the map. Mr. Albert indicated Doreen had called him already, and that he checked with Curt Horton, who told him he didn't need Trustees review because it was "salt walter" and not fresh water. Mr. Albert was again urged to check with Trustees since they were the only ones who could waive jurisdiction under the Trustees Code Ch. 97 (Wetlands), and suggested that he received something in writing before he gets a building permit. Copies to ZBA Members and Campbell file for information and update. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P~ Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. Joseph H. Sawicki James Dinizio, Jr. Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCO'IrT L HARRIS $~pervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southokl, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 . Teleph~ae (516) 765-1800 .- 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Our Regular Meeting of September 6, 1990 has been cancelled, we will be rescheduling another meeting date sometime in the middle of September. If you have any questions please call this department at (516) 765-1809. Yours very truly, Gerard P. Goehringer Chairman By Doreen Ferwerda ~/OLNEY RIGHTER ARCHITECTS $8 WINTER STREET BOSTON, IVIA. 02108 Copies of Legal Notice to the following on or about Septem- ber 17, 1990: Mr. and Mrs. Harold Gordon 124 Hickory Avenue Southold, NY 11971 Mr. K.T. Grathwohl, Jr. Willow Pond Lane Southold, ~ /_1971 Mr. and Mrs. Peter Bloom 135 Pacific Street Brooklyn, NY 11201 Mr. and Mrs. Kenneth Minnick 3305 Aldrich Lane P.O. Box 201 Laurel, NY 11948 Mr. Jacobs Albert James V. Righter Architects, 58 Winter Street Boston, MA 02108 Inc. Environment East, Inc. 3075 Indian Neck Lane Peconic, NY 11958 Michael N. Hills, Esq. 206 Roanoke Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 Mr. James Fitzgerald Proper-T Services P.O. Box 617 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Philip J. Cardinale, Esq. Cardinale & Cardinale P.O. Box W Jamesport, NY 11947 Charles R. Cuddy, Esq. P.O. Box 1547 180 Old Country Road Riverhead, NY 11901 Mrs. Venetia McKeighan 495 Bay View Avenue Southold, NY 11971 APPEALS BOARD IVlEM~BERS Gerard P. Go,bringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Serge Doyen, ir. Joseph H. Sawicki James Dinizio, Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTt L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed herewith as confirmation of the time, date and place of the public hearing concerning your application is a copy of the Legal Notice, as published recently in the Long Island Traveler-Watchman, Inc. and Suffolk Times, Inc. Please have someone appear in your behalf at the time specified in the event there are questions brought up during the same and in order to prevent a delay in the processing of your application. Your public hearing will not start before the times allotted in the attached Legal Notice. Please f~el ~_ree to ~ our office prior tot he b~_aring date if you have questions or wish to update your file. GERAP/) P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN By Linda Kowalski APPEAI.~ BOARD ~B~R~ Gerard P- Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. Joseph H. Sawicki James Dinizio, Jr. Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Sape~sor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road PiO. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 NOTICE OF HEARINGS NOTICE IS HEREBY GI%~-/~, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the Code of the Town of Southold, the following hearings wiT1 be held b~the SOuT~ubD%~DWNBOA~DUF APPEALS at a Regular Meeting, at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 on WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 1990, at the following times: .7:30 p.m. Appl. No. 3961 - VENETIA MCKEIGHAN. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-33, as disapproved, for permission to c~nstruct an accessory structure (gazebo) in an area other than the required rear yard. Property location: 495 Bayview Avenue, ~outhol~, l~f; County Tax Hap No. 1000, Section 052, Block 05, Lot 23. Page 2 - Notice of Hearings Southold Town Board of Appeals Regular Meeting of September 26, 1990 7:35 p.m. Appl. No. 3962 - HAROLD GORDON. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XXIV, Section 100-244 B, as existing residence. Proposed construction will have insufficient side yard setback(s). Property Location: 124 Hickory Avenue, Southold, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 78, Block 7, Lot 50. 7:40 p.m. Appl. No. 3966 - PETER BLOOM. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III A, Section 100-30 A.3, as disapproved, for permission to construct a deck addition to existing dwelling. Proposed construction will have insufffcient side yard sg.tbacks. amd 580 L'Hc~nedieu, 64, Block 2, Lot 53. Property location: 40 Old Shipyard Lane Southold; Cq.untyTax. Map No. 1000, Section 7:45 p.m. Appl. No. 3964 KENNETH MINNICK. Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 B(14), as disapproved, for permission to establish accessory apartment in proposed addition to existing one-family dwelling structure. Property location: 3305 Aldrich Lane, Laurel, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 124, Block 1, lot 3.2. Page 3 - Notice of Hearings Southold Town Board of Appeals Regular Meeting of September 26, 1990 _' 7:50 p.m. Appl. No. 3967 - KIM CAMPBELL. Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-33, as disapproved, for p~_rmissioa to ~_onstru~t ac~'~sor~ garage in an area other Variance to the~ \ than the required rear yard area. Property Location: East End Road, Fishers Island, Block 004, Lot 016. NY; County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 004, 7:55 p.m. Ap~l. No. 3963 - FRANK C~. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 A.4 (100-33) and Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4 B, as disapproved, for permission to construct an accessory building in an area other than the required rear yard area and with a setback of less than 75 ft. from. t~ bulkhead. Property Location: 780 Ha~waters Road, (Peconic Bay Properties Su~,.division), Cutchogue, Count~ Tax Map No. 1000, Section 111, Block 1, Lot 16. 8:00 p.m. Appl. No. 3960 - THOMAS & ALLISON SARGENT. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III A, Section 100-30 A.3, for approval of insufficient area, width and depth of parcels, each with an existing single-family dwelling, in this pending division or reseparation of merged properties, and for Page 4 - Notice of Mearings Southold Town Board of Appeals Regular Meeting of September 26, 1990 approval of reduced yard setbacks between existing structures and~ropert~ ]~n~. as ~ropus~d. Proposed uons~ructionof ~w lots will have insufficient widtk, depth and total lot area for this district. Property Location: Private Road of Fox Avenue, Fishers Island, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 06, Block 06, Lot 07. 8:05 p.m. Matters of J~S, PET~ & C~IS ~SKO~IS. Appeals No. 3951 and 3957 - Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Article IIIA, Section 100-30 A.3, Article ~III, Section i00-239.4 (100-239d), and Article III, Section 100-31A, for proposed deck construction which re~ires approval as to insufficient ~ideyards, excessive lot coverage, and reduced se~ack fr~ ~e ~ re,red,from ~e or~na~ghwater mark of Long Island Sound, and for approval of this s~standard 'merged). Property Location: 1350 Sound Beach Drive, Mattituck, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 106, Block 1, Lot 36 and Lot 37. Page 5 - Notice of gearings Southold Town Board of Appeals Regular Meeting of September 26, 1990 8:20 p.m. Appl. No. 3955 - DOMINICK SBLENDIDO & A. AHR/O~TO. W~~hej~on~mg Ord~nmmce, ArticlsILI A, Sections 100-30A.2 (100=31A) and 100-30 A.3, Article Xi~III, Section 100-230 (A), for interpretation regarding second kitchen and for permit concerning addition to the existing one-family dwelling for use as a second dwelling unit. Property Location: 185 Inlet Lane, Greenport, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 43, Block 004, Lot 37. 8:55 p.m. Appl. No. 3938 - VILLAGE MARINE. Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XI, Section 100-112, Article XII, Section 10071~!C(1), Article XXIII, Section 239.4, and Article XIX, for permission to construct ,~ddition to existing principal building with insufficient setbacks from the bulkhead, the northerly (side) setback, and to locate boat storage structure (boat rack) with insufficient setbacks from the northerly (side), westerly, easterly property lines, and bulkhead. Also requested is relief, as may be deemed necessary concerning parking and/or landscaping under the current revisions of the site plan regulations. Zone District: Marine I (M-I). Property location: James Creek, east side of Bay Avenue, Page 6 - Notice of Hearings Southold Town Board of Appeals Regular Meeting of September 26, 1990 3, Lot 15.1 The Board of Appeals will at said time and place hear any and all persons or representatives desiring to be heard in each of the above matters. Written comments may also be submitted prior to the conclusion of the subject hearing. Each hearing will not start before time allotted. Additional time for your presentation will be available, if needed. For more information, please call 765-1809. Dated: Septennber 6, 1990. ~Y ORDER.OFTTIESOUTHOLD TOWN BOAI{D OF APPEALS SERARDP. ~OR~r~INGER CHAIRMAN By Linda Kowalski JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF V1TAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 FAX (516) 765-1823 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 TO: SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD Of APPEALS FROM: JUDITH T. TERRY. SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK RE: ZONING APPEAL NO. 3967. KlM K. CAMPBELL DATE: AUGUST 7. 1990 Transmitted is application for variance submitted by James V. Righter Architects on behalf of KlM K. CAMPBELL together with letter of transmittal from James V. Righter Architects; notification to adjacent property owners; Zoning Board of Appeals Questionnaire form; Notice of Disapproval from the Building Department; letter authorizing James V. Righter Architects to apply on behalf of Klm K. Campbell; copy of Deed; short environmental assessment form; pictures of garage site; and copy of site plan. Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk · I'~~, l~/~qx-'~ TOWN OF $ouTHOLD, NEW YORK APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR NO. DATE 3.fl .. J,u ~Ly... ,L 9 9.fl., TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. James Volney Righter Architects, Inc. 58 Winter St. 1, (We) ................. : ................................................ or ............................................................................ Name of Appellant Street and Number Boston ' ...~..k....~ ................ HEREBY APPEAL TO Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR, ON APPLICATION FOR PERMIT NO ...... .(.~.9.~.e...) .................. DATED .....];..6.....A.~£..i..J:...~.9...9_O. ................... WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO ( ( (x) Name of Applicant for permit of 58 Winter St. Boston MA Street and Number Municipality State ) PERMIT TO USE ) PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY Building Permit 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY .E.a...s.t End. ~d.., F.ishers .,I.,s..,1. a.n.d.....R.e..s..i..,d.,e..Rl.:.z.A..gric. Street /Hamlet / Use District on Zoning Mop .D.j..s..t..r.j.c.t.~.1..~..~..~.~~.s..?.c..t.~!?.n.~~~.4.~.~..B.~..°..c.~.k~~.4..~L.?...t~~.t~.6.~~~~current O~ner Klm K. Campbell Mop No. Lot No. Prior Owner. E_lliort Wadsworth 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) Article III Section 100-33 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for (please check appropriate box) (x A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chop. 62 Cons. Laws Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal fl~a~)~as n_~)been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request for a variance and was made in Appeal No ................................ Dated ...................................................................... ( ) (x) ( ) is requested for the reason that The owner would like to REASON FOR APPEAL A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance build a garage in the front yard. (Continue Continued REASON FOR APPEAL 1 STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties or unneces- sary HARDSHIP because Placing a garage in the rear yard would put it between the house and the shore, blocking the water view from the house. A garage between the house and the water would also have a more negative environmental impact than if it were on the landward side of the house (front yard). 2. The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shared by oil properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district because The Fishers Island Club, immediately across the road no the south, has a storage building in its front yard. The neighbors immediately to the west (Lot no. 1000-004-4-15) have a storage/utility building in their front yard. 3 The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance aha WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because It is cusuomary for houses on the shore to have garages and other auxiliary structures in front or side yards rather than on the water-side. STATE OF ~ ) ) ss COUNTY OF~cf/~'~j /( ) Sworn to this .............. .~/..<~....~..: ................ day or -'~. /. ................................... 19~ BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter or the Petition of : Klm K. Campbell : to the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold : TO: FIDCO c/o Tom Doherty Fishers Island NY 06390 · NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold to request a~ri~nce-~(f~~(~ (~e~Rerm~ ~D~czx) [circle choice] 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adjacent to your property and is des- cribed as follows: Suffolk Co. Tax Map no. 1000-004-4-16 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: Residential-Agricultural 4 TbatbisuchPe6don, theundersigned willrequestthefotlowingrelief: To be ailowed to build a garage on the road-side (in the front yard). of the house 5. That the provisions of the Southotd Town Zoning Code applicable to the relief sought by the under- signed are Article III Section 100-33 [ ] Section 280-A, New York Town Law for approval of access over right(s)-of-way. 6. That within five day's from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold lown Clerk's Office at Main Road Southold, New York and you ma), then and there examine the same during regular office hours. (516) 7~'5-1809. 7 That before the relief sought may be granted, a public heanng must be held on the matter by the Board of Appeals; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: 30 July 1990 James Volney Righter Architects, Inc. Petitioner Owners'Names: Klm K. Campbell PostOffice Address 58 Winter St. Boston MA 02108 Tel. No. (617) 451-5740 [Copy of sketch or plan showing proposal to be attached for convenience purposes,] TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL To JA~mS V. RIGRTER ARCH. INC. 58 WII~ER ST. a/~ ~4RS. 'KIM K. BOSTON, ~. 02108 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application dated ~RIL 6 19 .~. for pe~it to .. CQ~STR~qI A .~ .~ .~ ............................... ar Location of Property House No. Street Ham/er County Tax Map No. i000 Section . .qq~ ......... Block .qq5 .......... rot ...q [~ ........ Subdivision ................. Filed Map No ................. Lot No .................. is returned he.with and disapproved on the fo~owing grounds ..... ACCESSORY BDILDINGS C~OT BE LOCA~D IN A FRO~ Y~, S~L BE LO~D IN 'r~ ~ Y~ O~Y. 100-33 . .~ :4q~.,. ::_~ .... c Date APRIL 16 19 90 Building Inspector CURTIS ~. HORTON RV 1/80 I .- (2].~.~ $,a,e Environmental Ouali,y Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL A$SESS~IENT FO~ Far UNLISTED ACTIONS only PA~T I--PROJEC~ INFORMATION ~ames Vo~ne7 Righter A~chltects, ~n'~. Campbell. _ Garage_. .uu.,cmam~Town of 'Southold 'co..,v Suffolk Eas-t End Fishers Island NY One-car garage Thi garage ~is proposed to be located in the front yard. Residential-Agricultural JO. Town of Southold building permit N.Y.State D.E.C. ruling of no jerisdiction N.¥.State D.E.C. ruling of no jurisdiction: Tidal Wetlands Dept. 18 April 1990; Fresh Water Wetlands Dept.27 June Architects, Inc. 30 July I'990 OVER 1 (Continued on reyerse sid~! James Volney Righter (Gl If all q~astiona have been answered No it i~ likely tha~ the Will projec= result in a larce 9by.ica! chance Will there be a major chance t~ any unique Will projec= al~u= or have a larqe effec= On Will pro~cr have a major effcct on visual char- il. Will pro]ec~ r~sult ia major ~raffic problems or 12. ~£li DrOlCC~ rcqulnrlV cause objectionable odor:. 13. Will pro,oct bare any impact on public QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND SUB,fITTED ~ITH YOUR ~PPL~CAP_O~,I FO[{14S TO THE BOARD OF At'PEALS Please complete, sign and return to the Office of the Board of Appeals with your completed application 'forms. If "Yes" is answered to any questions below, please be sure to depict these areas on your survey (or certified sketch), to scale, and submit other supporting documenta- tion. 1. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? YesG 2.a)Are there any areas which con=~in wetland grasses? (Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined by Town Code, Ch. 97 for your reference.) Yes ~ b)Are there any areas open to a waterway without bulkhead? Yes 3. Are there existing structures at' or"below gro~d level, such as patios, foundations, otc? Yes N~ 4. Are there any existing or proposed fences, cDncrete barriers, decks, otc? If project is proposed for an accessory building or structure, is total height at more than 18 feet above average ground level? State total: ' {~ ft. If project is proposed for principal building or structure, is total height at more than 35 feet above average ground level? State total: ......... ft. Yes Q Yes G ~.~. Yes NO 7. Are there other premises under your ownership abutting this parcel? If yes, please submit copy of deed. 8. Are there any building permits pending on this parcel (or abutting land under your ownership, if any)? State Permit ~ and Nature: ~4~ 9. Do state whether or not applications are pending concerning these premises before any other department or agency (State, Town, County, Village, etc.): Planning Board Town Board Town Trustees County Health Department Village of Greenport N.Y.S.D.E.C. Other 10. Is premises pending a sale or conveyance? If yes, please submit copy of names or pucchasers and conditions of sale. (from contract) 11. Is new construction proposed in the area of contours at 5 feet or less as exists? 12. If new construction is proposed in an area within 75 feet of wetland grasses, or land area at an eleva- tion of five feet or less above mean sea level, have you made application to the Town Trustees for an inspection for possible waiver or permit under the requirements of Ch. 97 of the Town Code? G Yes ~ Yes Yes Yes Yes Q Yes G Yes G 13. Please list present use or operations conducted upon the subject property at this time and proposed ~-~-~ Please submit photographs kef the record. I certify that the above statements are true and are being submitted for. reliance by the Board of Appeals in considering my application. Signa~ur~(~ (Authorized Agent) 1/88 Mrs. Rolla Campbell 1530A Cypress Dr. Jupiter FL 33469 30 July 1990 Board oi Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold NY 11971 Gentlemen: James Volney Righter Architects, Inc. have my permission to apply on my behalf for a variance to build a garage on my property on Fishers Island, Suffolk Co. Tax Map no. 1000-004- 4-16. Very truly yours, Kim K. Campbell ~ · J~,MES V. RIGHTER ARC~ ~ 58 Winter Street ~'~ BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02108 ~-' (617) 451-5740 TO Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Road - State Road 25 Southold, L.I., New York 11971 3 Ausust !990 Klm K, Campbell Garage Fishers Island WE ARE SENDING YOU [] Attached [] Under separate cover via .the following items: [] Shop drawings [] Prints [] Plans [] Samples [] SPecifications [] Copy of letter [] Change order [] COP~ES eATE NO. DESCRIPTION $150 filing fee; Application for variance (3 copies); Notice to neighbors (2); Z.B.A. questionnaire; Notice of disapproval; Owner's authorization; Copy of deed to property; Short Environmental Assessment form; Photographs of staked site; Plans of proposed garage; Site plan/survey (4 copies). THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: [] For approval [] For your use [] As requested [] For review and comment [] Approved as submitted [] Approved as noted [] Returned for corrections [] [] Resubmit [] Submit [] Return__ copies for approval copies for distributidn corrected prints [] FOR BIDS DUE 19 [] PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US Enclosed: Application for zoning variance to build a one-car REMARKS garage in the front yard for Klm K. Campbell on Fishers Island. COPY TO SIGNED: Jacob Albert HOWE, hi,'wife, ~e~ e3,ecuted the foregoing ingt?~3e~h a~ld-acki~o~!edged that {'~. t~ey executed the same. ~ ; ~ - ~ - On the day of 19 , before me to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the same. On the day of 19 , before me to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and that he is the of the corporation described knows the seal of said corporation; that the sea] affixed affixed by order of the board of directors'of said corpora- lion. and that he s gned: h name thereto by like order. On the day of 19 , before me the subscribing witness to the foregoing instrument, with whom I am personally acquainted, who. being by me duly sworn, did depose aha say that be resides at No. that he'knows to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument; that he. said subscribing witness, was present and saw execute the same: and that he, said witness, Bargain ale Deeil No. le3©qo 'd- ' 'L EDWARD R. HOWE and MARY S. HOWE,ux KIM CAMPBELL Distributed by CHICAGO TI~ SEGTION BLOCK LOT ig't;t It ]llJ~l~ TOWN of Southold County of Suffolk Herbert S. Grossman, Esq. 29th Floor 30 Broad Street New York, N.Y. 10004 z~ No. ~STRICT: 1000 SECTION: '05o00 BLOCK: 01.00 LOT: 004.000 -~ C~$U£T YOUg, LAWYER I~E]~OtE SIGHING THIS tt~ISTRU~'~ tHSTRUME,T sHoULD :E UStD By LAWYERS O.Ly EEqAVEEN EDWARD R. TIOWE and MARy S. HOW~, his wif~t~oth re~idiSg at 64 Jerry Daniels Road, Marlborough, Connecticut 06447, party of the first part, and KIM CAMPBELL, residing at 352 Center Island Road, Oyster Bay, New York 11771, party of thc second part, WITNESSETH, that the party of thc first part, in consideration of ten dollars and other valuable consideration paid by the party of the second part. does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land. with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate. lying and being m the Town of Southold, on Fishers Island, County of Suffol~ and State of New York, and bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a monument set on the southerly line or side of a 40 foot private road, which monument is situate South 20.01 feet and West 550.35 feet from the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangu- lation Station "East End 2" and running thence from said point of beginning South 15 degrees 18 minutes 00 seconds East 250.35 feet to s point; running thence North 84 degrees 55 minutes 20 seconds West 227.99 feet to a point; running thence North 39 degrees 14 minutes 10 seconds West 63.26 fe~t to a point and the southeasterly line or side of said 40 foot private road; running thence north- easterly the following three (3) courses and distances along the south~sterly line or side of said private road; (1) North 35 degrees 56 minutes 00 seconds East 80.94 feet; (2) on the arc of a curve to the right with a radius of 280.21 feet and whose chord is South 54 degrees 04 minutes 00 seconds East, 1~0.06 feet to a point and (3) North 70 degrees 42 minutes 20 seconds East 20.32 feet to the monument set at the point or place of BEGINNING. Together with any easement appurtenant to the premises above described for ingress to and egress from said premises over and along such private roads as~w or may hereafter exist connecting the said premises with the public highway. Together with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the Grantors zn and to said premzses. TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premmes to the tenter lines thereof; TOGETItER with the appurtenances and ail the estate and rights of me party of the firsI part m and to said prenuses: TO HAVE AND TO HOLD thc premises hereto granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the parry of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part covenants mat the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law covenants that the parry of thc firs: part will receive tnt consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consid- eration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any par of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" w'henever the sense of this indent.ute ~o requ res. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part bas duly executed fids deed the day and year first above written. Edward R. Howe Mary S. ~%owe F F¼ FLA~4 Bruce Anderson Environmental Consultant December 15, 1990 John Bredemeyer, President Southold Board of Trustees Town Hall --- P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re. Kim Campbell - Fishers Island Dear Mr. Bredemeyer~-- Please be advised that the field inspection for the above referenced project schgjuled for December 14, 1990 was cancelled by the applicant's agent~ James Volnsy Righter Inc. Field inspection has'been rescheduled for December 27, 1990. Sincerely~ Bruce Anderson cc. Jacob D. Albert, James Volney Righter 475 Rambler Road, 8outhold~ NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 James Volney Righter a r c h i t e c t s { n c 25 January 1991 Board of Town Trustees Town Hall 53095 Main Rd. Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 Re: Kim K. Campbell garage, Fishers Island Attention: John M. Bredemeyer Dr. and Mrs. Campbell have been discouraged by the mounting expenses of consultants, surveyors, and architects. Without getting a new survey of the whole site, if there is anything more your board can do based on Bruce Anderson's report and your own site visit, we would apprecmate it. Please advise. Very truly yours, Jacob Albert J a c o b D. A 1 b e r t · James V. Ri g h t e r · B r o o k e S. T r i v a s - Cynthia N. W a r d e I I 58 Winter Street · Boston .Massachusetts · 02108 o telephone · 617. 451.5740 Bruce Anderson Environmental Consultant January 5, 1990 Mr. John Bredemeyer, President Southold Board of Trustees Town Hall Po O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Bredemeyer, Attached is the natural resources report and map showing the approximate locations of .the various habitats gound on site for the Campbel project at Fishers Island. 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 Bruce Anderson Environmental Consultant Natural Resources Report Project name: Kim K. Campbell Project location: East End Road Fishers Island SCTM~; 1000-004-4-16 Project proposal: The applicant proposes garage and pool on'lands adjacent to construct to tidal wetlands. Description of site: Subject parcel contains 4.34 acres and is situated on the shorefront of Fishers Island Sound. the northern portion of the site fronts the Fishers Island Sound and its shoreline is characterized and regulated as coastal shoals, bars and mud flats the extent of which is marked at the high wa~er line. In ecological terms, this area is more aptly described as rocky intertidal. Rocky intertidal habitats are regarded as among the most diverse of shoreline habitats. The southeastern portion of the site fronts a tidal wetland system which extends southwards to East End Road. In all, the tidal wetlands appears to be roughly 8 acres in size. The low marsh area of this wetlands supports the low marsh cordgrass, Spartina alterniflora. Landward of this area, spikegrass, Disticulis spicata and the salt meadow grass, Spartina patens are found. The high marsh is dominated by marsh elder, Iva frutescens and groundsel bush, Baccharis halimifolia. Flags placed in the field for wetland delineation were placed on groundsel bush. Rip rap is found along the shoreline extending from the east from approximately the location of the existing cottage westward to the adjacent parcel now or formally owned by Balcom. South along the Balcom property subject property extends eastwards to the Fishers Island Development Corporation's Golf Course. Within this triangular portion of the property, a small depression is found. While water appears to collect within this depression the predominant plants present are considered ~o be upland species. Plants found within thm depression include a variety of brambles including black raspberry, and blackberry and other plants including switchgrass, chokecherry and multiflora rose. This habitat provides nesting habitat for a variety of small birds as bird nests were observed. Thickets are found surrounding the bluffs facing both wetlands and surface waters. Finally~ a dirt road used to access the Balcom property bisects this portion of the property. 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 The remainder of the property is primarily lawn areas which include a putting green east of the existing dwelling. Except for the putting green, lawn areas appear to have been only minimally fertilized if at all. Additionally, only a minimum (.if any) herbicides have been applied to these lawn areas as its composition appears to contain mostly fescues, rye grass, various weeds, clover and lesser amounts of bluegrass. Potential Environmental Impacts: The potential short term environmental impacts caused by the construction of a pool and garage are erosion and destruction of natural vegetation. As previously described natural vegetation is found within the wetland area as flagged, along the perimeter of the bluff, and easterly portion of the property. Clearing impacts can be entirely avoided by placing the pool and garage on the turfed portions of the property. The excavation of primarily the swimming pool has the potential for causing erosion particularly during the period when soils are stockpiled. The use of barriers including haybales and silt fences and the like can prevent the movement of these soils into low lying areas. The long term impacts caused by the existence of a pool and garage are the discharge of pool waters into wetlands, natural areas and surface waters, and increased runoff caused by greater impervious surfaces (garage roof). The direct discharge of pool waters into wetlands and surface waters are of particular concern since many of the chemicals used in swimming pools including chlorine, chlorine stabilizers, and algaecides are toxic to a wide variety of wildlife. The impacts related to pool pumpout can be greatly mitigated by use of a dry well to receive pool purapoun. Runoff caused by greater impervious surfaces can likewise be mitigated by the use of gutters, downspouts and drywells. It ~s recognized that stormwater generally infiltrates more slowly on Fishers Island than on Long Island because the predominant soils are typically finer than the course textured sands covering most of Long Island. Recommendations: The application as submitted should be regarded as incomplete because the survey does not indicate the exact location of the wetlands. These wetlands have since been flagged in the field. Also, the Trustee regulations governing wetlands permits require the survey to show topography at one foot intervals. While it is my opinion that two foot intervals are sufficient for analyzing potential erosion impacts to wetlands, the Board should decide whether two foot intervals are sufficient for their 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 consideration. Accordingly the Board should issue a waver of this requirement in writing to the applicant if it finds that two foot contours are sufficient for their regulatory purposes. I recommend that a survey showing the exact location of the wetlands, topography and all existing and proposed structures be submitted with a new wetlands application. In addition, I recommend that a new EAF Part one be submitted with the wetlands application since the previously filled out EAF occurred during a time when only a garage was proposed. Both the garage and swimming pool should be should be placed in the turfed areas of the property. The survey submitted by the applicant for the Board's consideration showed both the garage and swimming pool to be placed on the turfed area directly south of the existing dwelling and east of the existing driveway. In doing so the setback from the wetlands was approximately 50 feet. I have suggested that the orientation of the swimming pool may be rotated 90 degrees as to achieve a greater setback from the wetland as previously proposed. It is recognized that the placement of the garage must take into account the necessary turning radius of a car from the driveway and thus should not be located directly adjacent to the existing driveway. The erosion potential as related primarily to the excavation for the swimming pool may be controlled by the placement of haybales and silt fence around the perimeter of the project area. Haybales should be firmly staked into place. All excavated soils should be removed from the project site and placed in a suitable upland location. Increased runoff as created by the garage should be controlled through the use of gutters, downspouts and drywells. The pool should be serviced using a drywell. The drywell should be located away from wetlands and indicated on the approved survey. The exact size of the drywell is essentially an engineering question. However, given the predominant soils occurring in this area, it is anticipated that the drywell should be fairly large in size. 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 Bruce Anderson Environmental Consultant December 29, 1990 John Bredemeyer, President Southold Board of Trustees Town Hall P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re. Kim Campbell Fishers Island Dear Mr. Bredemeyer, I have reviewed the file on the above referenced project and can find no complete application which includes 7 a swimming pool. Accordingly, I have advised the applicant's agent that they should resUbmit an application for a wetlands permit. Said application should contain a survey showing two foot topographical contours, the iocation of the wetlands as flagged in the field, and all proposed structures. In addition, all application forms including the EAF should likewise be submitted. It appears that the proposed swimming pool may also ~/ need Zoning Board approval, t have suggested that applications for a zoning variance and a wetlands permit may be submitted simultaneously by the applicant. On December 27, 1990, a field inspection was made of the premises. Wetlands were delineated at that time. A natural resources report is in preparation at this time and will shortly be completed for the Board's review. 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 Bruce Anderson Environmental Consultant December 31, 1990 Jacob D. Albert James Volney Righter, 58 Winter Street Boston, Massachusetts Re: Kim K. Campbell, Dear Mr. Albert, Architects, Inc. 02108 Fishers Island It is estimated that the total cost in connection with the above referenced project is $ 560.00. These costs include the field inspection which took place on December 27, 1990 and the preparation of a natural resources report on the project. Sincerely, Bruce Anderson cc. John Bredemeyer, President Southold Board of Trustees 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 617.21 Appendix H State Environmental Quality Re~iew Notice of Completion of Draft/Final ElS SEQR Project Number Date This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law. A []Draft or []Final (check one) Envircqmental Impact Statement has been completed and accepted by the , as lead agency, for the proposed action described below. Comments on the Draft ElS are recues~eo and will be accepted by the contact person until Name of Action: Description of Action: Location: (Include street address and the name of the municipality/county. A location map of appropriate scale is also recommended.) Bruce Anderson Environmental Consultant December 31, 1990 Jacob D. Albert James Volney Righter, 58 Winter Street Boston, Massachusetts Architects, 02108 Re: Kim K. Campbell, Fishers Island Dear Mr. Albert, It is estimated that the total cost in connection with the above referenced project is $ 560.00. These costs include the field inspection which took place on December 27, 1990 and the preparation of a natural resources report on the project. Sincerely, Bruce Anderson cc. John Bredemeyer, President Southold Board of Trustees 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 Bruce Anderson Environmental Consultant December 15, 1990 John Bredemeyer, President Southold Board of Trustees Town Hall P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re. Kim Campbell - Fishers Island Dear Mr. Bredemeyer~ Please be advised that the field inspection for the above referenced project scheduled for December 14, 1990 was cancelled by the applicant's agent, James Volney Righter Inc. Field inspection has been rescheduled for December 27, 1990. Sincerely, Bruce Anderson cc. Jacob D. Albert, James Volney Righter 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 766-4071 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Region 1 Headquarters SUNY, Building 40, Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 Thomas C. Joriing Commissioner To: ; Representing: Dear . : In response to your request for a ~reshwater wetlands determination for the property identified below, the New York State Department of Envlronmental Conservation has determined that the parcel is more than 100 feet from regulated freshwater wetlands. Therefore, no permit is required under the Freshwater Wetlands Act (Article 24Jof the New York State Environmental Conservation Law). Location: Tax Map Number: Please be advised that this letter does not relieve you of the responsibility of obtaining any necessary permits or approvals from other agencies. Very truly yours, Christine J. Costopoulos Deputy Regional Permit Ad~:inistrator F-~ COMLOG ~PAPLOG ~MAP ~ CJi-RD FILE New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Region 1 Headquarters SUNY, Building 40, Stony Brook, NY 11794 Thomas C. Jorling Commissioner A review has been made of ygur p. roposal to: ~-~~- ~- Based on the information you have submitted, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation has determined that the parcel ~ project is: Greater than 300' from inventoried tidal wetlands. Landward of a substantial man-made structure greater than 100' in len§th which was constructed prior to 9/20/77. Landward of the 10' above mean sea level elevation contour on a gradual, natural slope. Landward of the tcpographic crest of a bluff, cliff or dune which is greater than 10' in elevation above mean sea level. Therefore, no permit is required under the Tidal Wetlands Act (Article 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law). Please be advised, however, that no construction, sedimentation or disturbance of any kind may take place seaward of the ]0' connour or topographic crest without a permit. It is your responsibility no ensure that all necessary precautions are taken no prevent any sedimentation or other alteration or disturbance to the ground surface or vegetation in this area as a result of your project. Such precautions may include providing adequate work area between the 10' contour or topographic crest and the project (i.e. a 15' to 20' wide construction area) or erection of a temporary fence, barrier, or hay bale berm. Please note that any additional work, or modification to the projecn as described, may require authorization by this Department. Please contact this office if SUCh ar~ contemplated. Please be further responsibility of agencies. advised cnan this letter does non relieve you of the obtaining any necessary permits or approvals from o~her Very truly yours,, Deputy Regional Permit Administrator James Volney Righter a r c h i r e c t s 12 November 1990 John Bredemeyer III Board of Town Trustees Town Hall 53095 Main Rd. Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 Re: Kim K. Campbell garage, Fishers Island Dear Mr. Bredemeyer: Enclosed you will find a completed Full Environmental Assessment form. I am also submitting copies of the zoning variance approval, granted to allow the garage in the front yard, and letters of no jurisdiction from th~ DEC. The DEC letter makes reference to the new garage and also to an addition to an existing guest cottage, which is not being done now. I am sure that the Campbells would be willing to do whatever planting is necessary between the garage and the wetlands if that will allow ths garage to be a bit closer to the wetlands than the mormal 75 ft. setback. Very truly yours, Jacob Albert Jacob D. Albert o James V. R i g h t e r · B r o o k e S. T ri v ~ s · Cynthia N. W a r d e 11 58 Winter Street - Boston .Massachusetts - 02108. telephone -617. 451. 5740 -1'4.16:~2 (2/87)--Zc 617.2~ Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review .NOV , FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FURl TOWN OF~OUTH©LD ~ Purpose: The full EAF is ~esigned to help apptican~ ~nd agencies determine, m an orderl mann~. ~hether a pro,er o~ action ma~ be ~ignificant. Ihe question of whether an action mag be ~ignificant i~ not alwag~ ea~ manswer. Frequen I~, there are aspects of a ~rOleCt that are subjective or unmeammabl~' It i~ als* under~tood that ~e ~ho detormm ~ignfficanee ma~ have litdo or no formal knowledge of the enuironment or mag be technicatl~ ~x~ in en~ronment[ analwi~. In addition, mang who have knowledge m one pa~icular area may not be aware of the broad~conceres affoctin · e question o~ significance. lh~ ~ull [AF i~ intended to ~rovide a method wherebg a~plican~ and agendes can be a~ured t~t~e dete~inatio proces~ ha* been orderl% comprehen~Ne in nature, get flexible to allow introduction of info~ation to fit a pro~ect or actior Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part I: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic projec data. it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 an~[ 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provide, guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whetherit is a potentiall,, large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part :2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used~/o evaluatewhether or not thc impacs is actually important. · DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: I'-I Part 1 ~ Part 2 ' I-'iFart 3 Upon review of the informauon recorded on this EAF ['Parts 1 and 2 ~nd 3 if appropriate}, and any other supporting information and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: E] A. The project will not result in any large and ~mportant impact(s} and. therefore, is onewhich will not have a sigmficam' impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. Fl B. Although the project could have ~ significant effect on the environment, there:will ~ot be a significant ~r this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' 3re large and imoortant impacts that may have a C. The pre on the envin Conditioned Negative :herefore a positive declaration will be prepared. ~s only valid for Unlisted Actions / . Name or Action Name oi Lead Agency I'rint or [,,,ff)e Name of Re~Lgnslble Officer in Lead Agency Signature o[ Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Date Title ot Responsible Otiicer Signature o! Preparer (Ii diiferent trom responsible officer} PART 1--PROJI:-OT INFG .~ATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This 'document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant on the ehvtronment. Please complete the entire form. Parts A through E. Answers to these questions wii! be cons as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addi information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not new studies, research or investigation. If information requmng such additional work is unavailable,to indicate and si each instance. . . NAME OF ACTION LOCATION OF ACTION [include Street AdOress. Municipffii~ and County) NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR t BUSINESS TELEPHONE CITYtPO I STATE t ZIPOODE NAME OF OWNER (if different} I ~F~NC~TELEPRONE ADDRESS C[TYIPO F=L-- DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Please Complete Each Question--indicate N.A. iJ not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1, Present land fis~: EJUrban I-ilndustria] I-ICornmercia] J~ResidentiaJ (suburban) i-lForest I~Agricu]ture ~Other IDRural [non-f~ 2. Total acreage of project area: ~" % acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE · /,4e,adc~ Brushland (Non-asncultura[) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETIOF I. '~'~ acres . I,go acre acres acres acres I, Z~ , acret Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL] Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock. earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type). [ ~.~0 ~ 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on prolect site? ~ ra,,~-,I a. Soil drainage: j~dVell drained icc % of site ~Moderately well drained , ,% of site ~Poorlv drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 /hrdugh 4 of the Land Classfficauon Svstem~ acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370}. 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on prolect site~ ~Yes ~No a. What ~s depth to bedrockt _ fin feet} 2 ~. 'Approximate percentage or ~ ,used project site with slopes: ~0-10% o,,, r-110-15% ' ' [~15% or greater % 6. Is proiect subsiantialJy contiguous to. or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the' State or the Nation; Registers of Historic Places? F']Yes ~No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? t~Yes 8. What is the depth of the water table? ~ 1"/ . (in feet) 9 Is site ocated over a primary, principal or sole source aquifer? ~Yes ~[No ,_.:~, 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [3Yes ~No 11. Does prelect site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangerec i-]Yes llano According to Identify each species 12. Are there an~; unique or unusual land forms on the project site? [i.e., c~iffs, dunes, other geological formation- ~Yes [~.No Describe 13. Is the proiecr site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area t-~Yes F~No If yes, explain 14.~ the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ./es~ RYes ~tNo I~:~po.t,~,~ ~j~ ~,'~ ~ [~ p.~ ~T~ ~ v~ ~13~reams within or contiguous to proiect area: ., M,~. a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponas, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name ~_~,5~ ~-t,.~4~, ~-~ ~ [$~ -~ouhc[ b. Size (In acres] 17. Is the s~te served by ~xisting public utilities? ~Yes ~No a} Jf Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~Yes E3No b) If Yes. will imurovements be necessary to allow connection? E2Yes ~No 18. Is the site located m an agricultural distnct certified oursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law. Article 25-AA Section 303 and 304? ~Yes 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Enwronmental Area designated pursuant to Article of the ECL. and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~[Yes [~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ~Yes ~No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriatel a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor ~ ' '~ b. Pro~ect acreaee to be develooed: M./x,. acres initially; tO .A, c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped ~) ~A, acres· d. length of project, in miles: [~J '~. Jif appropriate) e. If the prelect ~s an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed ~ ,~' %; f. Number of off-street parkin~ spaces exlsdng ~,~. ; proposed .. g. ~X~axJmum vehicular trms generated net hour M* ~. lumen completion of prolectlt h. If residenHai: Number and Wpe of bodsing umts: One Faintly Two Family Mulb 0lc Family Initially v Ulhma mir ~ i. Dim~,nsmns I'in feet) oi largest prooosed structure [~ height; lC~ width: ~ length. I. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare prelect wdl occuov i~? U'~' ft. · acres ultimately. 3 ~ow much natural material (' - rock, earth, etc.] will be removed from -' site? tons/cubic ~varos C.~ '~ill disturbed areas be reclaimed? ~Yes i-lNo I-'IN/A a If yes for what intends,: purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Wilt topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? l~]Yes c.' Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [~Yes E]No 4. How many acres of vegetation [trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? O acres. 5. will any mature forest [over 100 years old] or other tocalt~'-important vegetation be removed by this project? l-lYes []No ' 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 'Z., months, [including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a, Total number of phases anticipated k},~, [number). b, Anticipated date of commencement phase I . month year, [including demolition) c, Approximate completion date of final phase month '/ear: d, Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? l-lYes F'INo" 8. Will blasting occur during construction? l~Yes ~.No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 3~ z~ ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [~]Yes ~[No If yes, expiain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? E]Yes [.No' a If yes, indicate type of waste [sewage, industrial, etc.'l and amount ,,--~_ b. Name of water body into which effluent wdI be d~schargea , , 13.~s subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~Yes ~No.../'Type ~,..~ 14 ~.~ill surface area of an existing water or body increase decrease by proposal? ExoJain [No I5. 16. 17. Is prolect or any portion of project located m a 100 year flood plain? Will the project generate solid waste? ~Yes J~bNo a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility'be used? ~Yes rqNo c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go rnto a sewage disposal system or into a samtarv landfill? e. If Yes, explain ~Yes ~No ~ ~.'t+r-~.} EYes F~No Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes. what is the anticipated site life? Will proiect use herbicides or pesucides? [~Yes []lYes ~No tons/month. [.No 18. 19. Wil project routinely produce odors [more than one hour per day)? E~Yes g2]No 20. Will project produce operating nmse exceeding the local ambient noise levels? E]Yes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? I-lYes [~No If yes , indicate type(s] 22. If water supply is from wells, indicat~ pumping capacity h0. ,A. gallons/minute. 23. To~al anticipated water usag~ per day O gallons/day. 24. Does prolect involve Local. State or Federal funding? E]Yes [~No If Yes, explain ~,No 25.' ~p?rovals. R equir ed: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board f-lYes [21No City, Town, Village Planning Board []Yes i-INo City. Town Zoning Board -IYes City, County Health Department []Yes rqNo Other Local Agencies V'lYes f-lNo Other Regional Agencies []Yes State Agencies ~-lYes Federal Agencies r~Yes C. Zoning and Planning Information 1, Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ~LYes f-iNo If Yes, indicate decision required: ,/, el~,,~_t~ t~ -~"'i~ ~ ~,,t~'~4 []zoning amendment ~zoning variance I-Ispecial use permit I-Isubdivision EJsite plan V'lnew.rrevision of master plan ~]resource management plan [other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? [~3 ~1 - 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? mo - 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6, Is the proposed ,action consistent with the recommended uses in'adopted local land use plans? ~,Yes 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zomng classifications within a % mile radius of proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? .. a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization{s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? I~Yes 11. Wi] the ;roposed action crea~e a demand for any community provided services {recreation, education, polio fire protection)? [~Yes ~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ti-lYes l-aNo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? i-lYes a; If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? l-I~es fqNo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your prolect. If ther~ are or m~ay be any adver~ impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impact5 and the measures wi!ich You propose to miugate ~ avo,d them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name ~ ~,t'~.~-4~ ~olk.~, ~ L~ ~.~t-~, ~. Date ~I ~ ~' ~ O with this assessment. ' 5 Pa~: 2--P~,OJ~CT t6TP~ACTS AND T;~-':~,R ~IAGNiTUDE - . . - Responsibility o~ Le~d Age,~cv General Information (Read Carefully) · in completing the form the reviewer should be guided by ~he question: Have my responses and determinations reasonable]' The reviewer i5 not expected to be an ~pert environmental analyst. · identifying that an impact wiii be potentiai]y large (column 2} does not mean that it is also necessarily signff~c~ Any targe impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 s~ asks that i( be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the revi~er by showing types o( impacts and whereve[ possible the threshok magnitude tha~ would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the for most situations. Bu~ for any specific project or site other examples and]or ]ower thresholds may be appropn for a Potential Large Impact respoese, thus requiring evaluation in P~r[ 3. · The impac~ of each project, on each site. in each locality, wil[ vary, Therefore, the examoles are illustrative have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive tist of impac[s and ~hresho]ds to answer each quest: · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question,. ' In identifying impact, consider long term, short term and cumiative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes i~ there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as ~es answers. c. If answering Yes [o a auestion then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of lmpacL If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. ]f impact will occur but threshc is lower than example, check column 1. d, If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART e. if a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moder[ ~mpact. also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. T] must be explained in Part IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the ,~reoosed action result in a physica change to the project s te~ E]NO "~¥E$ £xamoles that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on sio0es of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of iength], or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet, · Construction of paved parking area for 7,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 /Jet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will con dnue for more than 1 year or Involve more than one phase or s[age, · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 Ions et natural material (i.e., rock or soil] per year. · Construction or expan5 ton of a sanitary landfill · Construction in a designated, floodway. 2 Vv'ill there be an effect t~..,.w ua,que or unusual [and forms found on the sitef {i e., c frs. dunes, gee oglca formntions, e[c.~'NO ~YES · Speofic ~and forms: 6 I 2 3 Small to , Potential Can Impact Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Chang, [] [] [Z]¥es i'"q ~o [] E] E]¥es ~No L-'] ~] E]Ves [~No [] [] F-tYeL E]No [] [] E]¥es [] [] 13Yes E]No [] [] Eg'res [] ~ ~Ves ~ El ~¥es E]No E] 'Z] E]¥es re'No IMPACT ON WATER Will proposec[ action affect any water body designated as protected? {Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law. ECL) E~amples that would apply to column 2 Developable a~ea of site contains a protected water body, Dre~gin8 more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of p[otected stream. Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. Constructio~ in a desipnate~ freshwater ut tidal wetland. Wilt proposed action affect an~ non-protected existin8 o~ new body of water~ ~O ~YES E~amples that would apply to column 2 A 10% increase or decrease in the su[face a~ea of any body of water Construction of a body of wate~ that exceed~ 10 acres of surface a~ea. Other impacts: $. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? I-~NO Examples that wouJd apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will_require a discharpe permit. · Prouosed Action requires use of a source of water that does .not have approval to serve proposed {project) acuon. · Proooseu Action rec]u~res water suppiy from wells with 8rearer than gaJJons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operat;on cousin8 any con[ammauon or a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. ·Pfoposed Action would use water m excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likeb., cause siltation or other discharge into an e×isting body of water ~o tn~ extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 12100 · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and]or sewer services. · Proposed Action Iocate5 commercial and!or industrial uses wbich may facdme~. · Other impacts: /-~/'~ z~/~'~'. Will proposed acuon alter draiu,~e [luw or pa[terns, c~r >ur[ace water runorf,f ~NO ~--YES Examples that would a;plv to column 2 Proposed Action would ch3nge ilood wa~er Hows. -~ I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact [ Moderate Large Mitigated B Impact Impact Project Chsn - [] [] []Yes I--IN [] [] F-1 Yes []N [] [] f'-~Yes I--IN ~ [] ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~N, ~ i ~' ~Yes ~N~ ~ ~ ~'e~ ~N~ · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will aflow development in a designated floodway. · Other ~mpacts: IIVlPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? -~NO i~YES Examples that would aopiy to column 2 · Propese~ Action will induce 1.000 or more vehicle trips in any §ivan hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proooseo action will allow an Increase in the density of industrial deveiooment within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: h~PACT ON PLANTS AND ANI~IALS Will Prooosed Action affect any threatened or endangered soecies? l-tHO Examnles tha~ would apply to column ~educdon et one or more specie~ listed on the New Yor~ or Federal list, usm~ ~he site. over or near si[e or found off the 5ire. Removal o~ an~ portion o~ a critical or s~gnJficant wildlife habitat. Application of pesticide or herbicide more than ~ice a ,,'ear, other than ~or agricultural purpose~. Other impacts: ~ ~~ /~ W Proposed Action substantiaJJy affect non-threatened nomendange~ed species~ ~NO Examples tha~ would app[y ~o column 2 Prooosed ~ction would substantially interfere with any resident m,~ratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. Proposed Action teauires the removal of more than 10 acres (~t mature ~orest (over 100 years et age) or other locally impor~an[ IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources~ ~NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 The Dro[)osed action would sever, cross or limit access to a~HcuJtural land [includes cropMnd, havIJeld~. 3astute. vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 Small to Potential Moderate Large Impact Impact Can impact E Mitigated Project Chan¢ ~Yes ~N< [][Yes L~.~N, FiVes' ~N~ []]Yes ~N~ F~Yes ~-_JNo [] Yes [] No E~Yes E~INo ~Yes [--JNo ~Yes ~L~No [~Yes I~No []]Yes [~No E~No []Yes [~No ~Yes [~Yes ~Yes ~No F'~Ves [~]No · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land, · The proposed action~would irreversibly ~onvert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land managemen~ systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches. strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g, cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other ~mpacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES E3NO 11 Will proposec~ action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Ezamples that would apply to column 2 · Pronosed [and uses, or project components obviously different from or m sharp contrast to current surrounding land use pat[ems, whether man-made or natural, · Prooosed land aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enloYment ot the aesthetic qualities of that resource. uses, or project components visible to users ~f · Project comoonents that will re'suit in the eliminauon or significant screemng of scenic views known to b,e important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12 Will Proposed Action ~mpact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ~J'NO F1YES Examples that would appw to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within tile project s~te. ~ Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPAC~ AND REC,qEATION 13 Will Proposea Action affect the quantity or quality ot existinR ot future ouen spaces or recreational opportumtles? Examples that would apply to column 2 ~NO ~YES The permanent foreclosure o~ a future recreational o~portumtv A major reduction of an open space lmpor[a~ [O l~e cOmmunl~v. Other ~mpacts: 9 I 2 3 Small to Potential , Can Impact Bo Moderato Largo Mitigatod By Impact Impact Project Change 1'-I ID 'i~Yes raNo [] [] ["~Yes []No [] []. I-lYes []No [] [] F'IYes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] E]Yes []No ~ E] DYes E]No I [] [] []Yes E]No [] [] IZ]Y~s. , []No [] [] I-lYes []No I [] '[] JZ1Yes [~ [] DYes ID [] DYes []No [] [] []Yes IZ]Np. IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. Will there 9e an effect to existing transportation systems? ~NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. "Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ' Other ~mpacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy' supply? ~]NO F'qYE5 £xampJes that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase In the use of any form of energy in the mumcioality. · Proposed Action wilI require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family resieences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Prooosed Action? ~NO I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hosoitah school or other sensiuve facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more man one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for nmse outside of structures, ° Proposed Action wiJ remove natural barriers that would act as a arose screen. · Other ihapacts' IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect Dt, oIic health and safety? ;~ffNO I~YE5 Examples thai would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of exolosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or dmre may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in anv form [i.e. tox;c, poisonous, highly reactive, rad~oachve, irritating, infectious, etc. J · Storage facilities for one mdlion or more gallons of Jiquified natural gas or other tlammabJe Iici J~ds. · Proposed act[on may result m the excavation or other disturbance w,thm 2.000 feet or a site used for the d~¢nosal of sohd or hazardous · Other tmpacts: ,., 10 Small to Moderate impact Potential Large Impact [] [] [] Can tmpact Mitigated B Project Chan E]Yes ~N ~,~ [-~Yes ~IN J'-JYes l-iN ~]Yes ~N ~Yes ~N f-lYes ~]N~ l-lYes f-~Yes _.~Nc ~-], Yes F-~l N( [~Yes I-lYes- - ~Nc [~Yes ~Nc [~Yes :-[~ Yes [~Yes E~No IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing commum[v~ ~NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%': ' ~ ' · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services wilt increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this pro/ecl: · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e,g. schools, police and fire, etc,) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts: I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Chang~ E~ [] E~Yes I'~No [] [] ' ~[Yes ('~No [] I [] E]¥es E]No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No G ~' ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No 19 Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy feinted to potential adverse environmental impacts.~ ~NO l-tyEs If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE I~IPORTANCE OF I~iPA,.;'TS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may b mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each ~mpact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: I Briefly describe the imoact, 2. D~scribe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate imDact by prolect changers _3. Based On the information available, decide if it ~s reasonable to conclude that this impact ~s important. To answer the ouestion of importance, consider: · The probability of the ~mpact occumng · The duration of the ~mnac[ · Its irreversibil/ty, including permanentl,, lost resources of v,due · Whether the impact can or wil he controlled · The regional consec uence of the impact · Its potential divergence from Ioca needs and ~:oals (Continue on attachments) 11 61721 Appendix B S =te Environraental Quality Review V sua] EAF Addendum SEQR This form ma!/be used to provide additional information rela~ing to Question 1 l'~f Part 2 of the Full EAF, (To be completed by Lead..~gency) Distance Between Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · A site or structure listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places.9 · State Parks? · The State Forest Preserve.; · National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? · National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding · natural [eatures? · National Park Ser~'ice lands? · Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic or Recreational? · Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System. or Amtrak? · A governmentalty established or designated interstate or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? · A site. area. lake. reservoir or highway designated as · Municipal park, or designated open space? · County road? · State? · Local road? Project and Resource (in b~iles) 0-~,~ ¼-V2 V2-3 3-5 _5+ 2. Is tim visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) []Yes ~JNo Are any of the resources checked in question I used by the public during the time?p[ year during which the project will be visible) ,~' Yes ENo DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From-each item checked in question l, check those which generally describe the environment. surrounding Within · I/,~ mile ~' 1 mile Essentially undeveloped [] [] Forested [] [] Agricultural [] [] Suburban residential [] [] Industrial ~ [] Commercial [] [] Clrban [] [] River, Lake. Pond [] [] Cliffs. Overlooks [] [] Designated Open Space [] [] Fiat [] ~ Hilly [] [] Mountainous [] [] Other [] [] NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: 'V2 mile []Yes '1 miles []Yes []No *2 miles 'l--lYes [~]No '3 miles []-']Yes []No ' Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed projec~ is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. " CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is Activity Tr~vel to and from work Involved in recreational activities Routine travel by residents At a residence At worksite Other FREQUENCY Holidays/ Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally [] [] James Volney Righter a r c h i t e c t i n c 19 October 1990 Board of Town Trustees Town Hall 53095 Main Rd. Box 1179 Southold Ny 11971 Re: Kim K. Campbell, Fishers Island Attention: John M. Bredemayer III We would like to amend our application dated 28 September 1990 for permission to build a garage for Kim K. Campbell on Fishers Island. The Campbells would like to add a swimming pool between the new garage and the existing main house. A sit~ plan is enclosed showing the proposed location of the pool~ When you visit the property to look at ~he ggr~e site, could you please also consider the pool. We would like to have the two prooects considered separately, so that any possible dif- ficulties with one project won't hold up the other. Thank you. Very truly yours, Jacob Albert I a c o b D. A l b e r t · J a m e s V, R i g h t e r * B r o o k e S. T r i v a s · C y n t h i a N. W a r d e I 1 58 Winter Street · Boston , Massachusetts · 02108 · telephone . 617- 451. 5740 JAMES V. RIGHTER ARCH[ ~TS 58 Winter Street BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02108 WE ARE SENDING YOU ~ Attached [] Shop drawings [] Under separate cover via ~tems: [] Prints [] Plans [] Samples [] Specifications [] Copy of letter [] Change order [] COPIES DATE NO. { DESCRIPTION , I I THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: [] For approval [] For your use [] As requested [] For review and comment [] FOR BIDS DUE [] Approved as submitted [] Resubmit [] Approved as noted [] Submit [] Returned for corrections [] Return [] copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints 19 [] PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO ~'"~t/~ ~ SIGN / / BALCOM BENCHMARK .. ~¢. ~ , ,~ ,, ,... ~ ~ Y/~ T o.% : . ~*~ :"~ .... &,( ,, "'~t~+ ~~ / ~ ~ ' fL'_ ~ , ' ...."' ... ....: -:'? ~ ~ ,.., ToWN OF sOUTHOLD Marsh ,:~' ~,~a~c~- _~q. ' SITE PLANm ode ~r ~o~ -., ROLLA B. CAN ~E, I - ~0 fe~t OHM ,., SITE ROL~AB CAMPBELL ~SH,[RS rIS~NOI NEw YORK ~ f", ~o f~., CHA~~~ Docko, Inc. 2-: ~ ']~'ZL~:~ ~'1 '! 355 RO. Box 421, Mystic, CT 06 (860) 572-8939 Fax: (860) 572-7569, e-mail: docko@snet.net January 18, 2005 Mr. Albert Krupski, President Southold Board of Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Krupski: Re: Rolla Campbell Property Boat Lift Variance Last summer the Board of Trustees approved the removal of a floating dock and ramp and extension of the fixed pier including an "L' shaped end pier for Rolla and Klm Campbell's property in East Harbor on Fishers Island. Part of their original application was the installation of a boat lift as well. We would like to know if the Board of Trustees would be agreeable to reconsidering the boat lift since it was not approved as part of the dock modification application. We understand that the dock ordinance prohibits the installation of boat lifts. I feel however that there are mitigating circumstances in East Harbor that are beyond the considerations emphasized when the ordinance was adopted. The water in East Harbor is usually wavy and can be rough when there is a west or especially northwesterly, wind. The waves build with significant fetch in Fishers Island Sound and as the water depths become shallow in East Harbor, especially at low tide, the waves build toward the breaking point in the vicinity of the Campbell's dock. This is a tough environment to put a boat in the 20' to 35' range and during such conditions the vessel will stress and wear the tie-offlines significantly and even damage the cleats or guides on the vessel. This was the justification behind the boat lift installed at the Balcom's property next door in the 90's. We feel that this is an urgent consideration for the Campbell's for boating to be realistic and for the safety of the Campbell's and the equipment to be maximized. Conditions in the Sound can change quickly; smooth water at departure does not guarantee smooth water upon returning. It would be greatly appreciated if you would reconsider this; we would be agreeable to making a presentation or visiting with you at the site at your convenience to observe these particular conditions. Again, we feel that the prohibition against boat lifts is a viable consideration in small creeks and protected areas, but this is not one of those areas. If you could let me know the consensus of the Board, we will pursue this further as appropriate. SO, INC.. -, B. Neilson, P.E. KBN:jm ~ CC: Dr. & Mrs. Rolla Campbell File: 03-03-1409 CAMPBELL