Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCAMPBELL, KIM Q TRUSTEES SCOTT L. HARRIS John M. Bredemeyer, III, President ��` Supervisor Henry P. Smith, Vice President Albert J. Krupski, Jr. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road John L. Bedngski, Jr. P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 John B. Tuthill BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 February 1, 1991-- James Volney Righter 58 Winter Street Boston, Massachusetts 02108 RE: Kim K. Campbell Dear Mr. Righter: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Board of Trustees on Thursday, January 17, 1991: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Trustees approve the report of consultant, Bruce Anderson dated January 5, 1991 and waive the ;contours requesting 3' contours. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB:jmt cc: ZBA Bruce Anderson �f y TRUSTEES SCOTT L. HARRIS John M. Bredemeyer, 111, President Supervisor Henry P. Smith, Vice President Albert J. Krupski, Jr. �� �� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road all P.O. Box 1179 John L. Bednoski, Jr. Southold, New York 11971 John B. Tuthill BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTE Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1892 TOWN OF S C 'a Telephone (516) 765-1800 [E +a yr , fig APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE E� , Sf6w SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK, FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A"PERN[I7PURSUANT TO THE LAWS, ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE COASTAL AND INTERIOR WETLANDS, FLOOD PLAINS AND DRAINAGE AREAS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN, AND THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 32 OF THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. APPLICATION NO. DATE Ci + Z -90 APPLICANT'S NAME: J&Vv % .5 EL. NO. (e{'7-t45'l-S740 MAILING ADDRESS: ''> $ WL" r St. l?Pa0im MA ova$ AGENT: TEL NO. AGENT ADDRESS- PERMIT REQUESTED TO: h t j,0-& 4 CM2• Cta,r �w lvr-t.s t LOCATION OF PROPERTY FOR REQUESTED PERMIT: RAlf 0 JR. / f�i`SZta► �, ISIGaeG TOWN: TAX MAP NO: 1000— ooe+ 4 - CREEK, BAY OR HARBOR FRONTING PROPERTY: E4 S ' HP-.r b w R$ke s (S(6,,,j So wra' SIZE OF PROPOSED WORK: LEND its, (te T n WIDTH: Page 2. %(cis, YDS. TO BE EXCAVATED: YDS. TO BE FILLED: MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED: 6xc4v&tl'*°h wol 6efts,... .fw * ►w.. Js i v-+ j '!'6M 104,&L. 4,i t L4, w-& k.a e.G"e. t,. �rats i�,� k ►'r~c��. WIDTH OF CANAL, CREEK OR BAY FRONTING PROPERTY: &sr 4 twtoar. Ftsu" Isis. J DEPTH AT LOW TIDE: rt.A" AVER. RISE IN TIDE: DISTANCE TO NEAREST CHANNEL: DISTANCE PROJECT EXTENDS BEYOND SIMILAR PROJECTS IN AREA: O (ZQ.Si�^{'ti-u1.. AC4v��c.�.c4iu.rer� AREA ZONING: -IS PROJECT FOR PRIVATE OR BUS. USE: praua'Cz INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY: VG•C&4rh vw. lA o u se. DESCRIBE KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON PREMISES: SdA4'm. aq c.�O%AJL HAS ANY PRIOR LICENSE OR PERMIT BEEN ISSUED TO ERECT STRUCTURES, DREDGE, OR DEPOSIT FILL ON SAID PREMISES: ►Q$y HAS ANY LICENSE OR PERMIT EVER BEEN REVOKED OR SUSPENDED BY A GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY: ig O DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION OF PROPERTY: DESCRIBE PROPOSED CONDITION OF PROPERTY AFTER WORK IS COMPLETED. INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITE IF NECESSARY: 1"h¢ crvotvtr, u.ri(t }s! lft-i- exact-1N �,t: grs Sa,.f Ce�.tli kt-at, ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED WHICH WOULD PROHIBIT THIS PROJECT: h a WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER IF NOT THE SAME AS APPLICANT: �1vt1.mrt2ahc+. LtH-y o-u 4Ge win Tewt sC Sen4i'k.4l -Z8A COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) �n��warE- STATE OF # R J 1 VVI (! . ��� 'J t�c�.__ BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND SAYS THAT HE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS, AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION ARID AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT, IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE, TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. Sig ature of A OF p icant 14 19 10 SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY y ' �Ex ses NOTARY PQBLIC fKh22, 1995 irM.. EXAMINED BY APPROVED DISAPPROVED CONDITIONS (If any) SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN COMPUTATION OF FEES Approved 2/27/85 1'R.18-412187)—Text 12 _'� m @+°'y�y$ ., PROJECT LD.NUMBER st7.11 ¢ f 3 '�^ 1,8 av .C)G R Appendix C State Environmental Qualityevlew q� —' SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSO,,ME W611M 999 For UNLISTED ACTIONS ` .. PART [—PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) To — 1 APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME JA►+~�s Vol Ri kIko 3. PROJECT LOCATION: / �r / Municipality nsL l L31" ' S�e�j-t�.o le,{ County SJPz1!k. 4. PRECISE LOCATION(Street address a� t and road int�ersections,prominent landmarks,etc., for provide map) TI _ S-r -Az i 4. Co. 't&x. w`a� # !000. o o 44. 44 ((e 5. IS PROPOSED POSED ACTION: r� pp New ❑Expansion Q Modificationialteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: 1 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially acres Ultimately acres 8. WILL PROPOSED�ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER.__EXI1�TING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? El Yes W No if No,describe briefly T� P rwpoiC✓ g W� t',7 yµ Tlw— +{"{•'pN,r` b+�,R 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? IOResidential ❑ridustrial ❑Commercial ❑Agriculture ❑Park/Forest/Open space ❑Other Describe: 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL,OR FUNDING,NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY(FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? M.'{, S'�'>R.1i. `1�+,ice",'C',,. ►a.t.. ..e 8 1�,p .vyr)jt}i c�'Lh"la I`S�til4 �"'L,`� —r!t> 14 Yes ❑No If yes, list agency(s)and permittapprovals - Tewr, e� Sav'd"tw1.4P bu;le9�..,ef Pmtrur.ii" _ 11. ,QDOES ANY ASPECT OF THE.ACTIO14 HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? IO Yes ❑No If yes,list agency name and permit/approval �,IE.G,. +� SRQ G.-!a W-i' . 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? ❑Yes 54 No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE �b ApplicanUsponsor name: t'�JwA a V'b�41daf, R�ext�.,��_f0l ,. 45—}�t, , , U.C.UDate: \ Signature: 1 If the action is in the Coastal Area, and YOU are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER PART II—EN`JIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Agency) _ A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY Tyr THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.12? If yes, dinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. ❑Yes ❑No e. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.6? If No,a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. ❑Yes ❑No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING:(Answers may be handwritten, if legible) C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential.for erosion,drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: - C2. Aesthetic,agricultural,archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources;or.community or neighborhood character?Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna,fish,shellfish or wildlife species,significant habitats,or threatened,or endangered species?Explain briefly: Cd. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources?Explain briefly. C5. Growth, subsequent development,or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. C6. Long term, short term,cumulative,or other effects not identified in C1-05?Explain briefly. C7. Other impacts(including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. 0. 1$THERE,OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE,CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? ❑Yes ❑No If Yes,explain briefly PART III—DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE jo be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above,determine whether it is substantial,large,important.or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e)geographic scope; and if) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. ❑ Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or Significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF andlor prepare a positive declaration. ❑ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: Name of Lead Agency Print ur type Neme or Kesponable Uthcel m Lead Agency title of tdespoms bhe Crocer Yignature or Nespomible Officer m Leed Agency Signature of Prepater tit different from responsible orh[er) Data -3 - 2 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS ^, Supervisor Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. '$� ;: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Serge Doyen; Jr. P.O. Box 1179 Joseph H. Sawicki Southold, New York 11971 James Dinizio, Jr. BOARD OF APPEALS Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1809 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone 65-1800 a 1{ Si A �s OWN OF SOi,3T DLO ' ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3967: Application of KIM CAMPBELL. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-33 as disapproved, for permission to locate accessory building in an area other than the required rear yard. Location of Property: East End Road, Fishers Island, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 004, Block 004, Lot 016. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on September 26, 1990 all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is located along a private right-of-way off Orientale Avenue at Fishers Island, Town of Southold, and is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 4, Block 4, Lot 16 Page 2 - Appl. No. 3967 Matter of KIM CAMPBELL Decision Rendered October 17, 1990 2. The subject premises contains a total lot area of 4.34+- acres and is improved with a dwelling and structures as shown on the May 18, 1987 survey prepared by Chandler, Palmer & King (and updated March 26, 1990) . 3. By this application, appellant proposes to locate a 26 ft. by 24 ft. accessory garage structure in the yard area facing the private road, which technically is the front yard area. The subject building is proposed for those accessory uses specifically permitted in the zoning code for this R-120 Zone District and at a height not to exceed 16 feet to the ridge (proposed) . (See copies of construction plan sketch prepared by James Volney Righter, Architects dated March 16, 1990 for building data. ) 4. Article III, Section 100-33 (referred from Article III-A, Section 100-30A.4) of the Zoning Code allows accessory buildings to be located in the required rear yard area, but does not provide for accessory buildings to be located in any other yard area. 5. In considering this application, the Board finds and determines: (a) that the circumstances of this application are uniquely related to the land; (b) that there is no other method for appellants to pursue; and placing the structure in any other location on the premises would require other variance relief; (c) that the area chosen for the accessory structure is not unreasonably located, being 445+- feet from the private road and 55 or more feet from the edge of the marsh; (d) that the variance will not in turn cause a substantial effect on the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience and/or order of the Town; (e) that precedents have been established in area waterfront communities for the same or similar placement of accessory buildings in a yard area different than the seaward areas of the dwellings; d e Page 3 - Appl. No. 3967 Matter of KIM CAMPBELL Decision Rendered October 17, 1990 (f) that in carefully considering the record and all the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by granting the variance, as applied and conditionally noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT a Variance in the Matter of the. Application of KIM CAMPBELL as applied under Appeal No. 3967 for the placement of an accessory garage/storage building in the front yard area (as described in the above Findings) , SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. That the accessory building be located as requested (445+- feet from the private road and 55 or more feet from the nearest marsh area) ; 2. That the accessory building not exceed the proposed height at 16 feet from grade; 3. That the subject accessory building not be used for habitable, sleeping or business purposes; 4. That the size of the building not exceed 20 feet by 25 feet at any time; 5. All other provisions of the Code as pertain to accessory uses and accessory buildings for this Zone District (such as storage and garage uses) . Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Doyen, and Dinizio. (Member Sawicki was absent. ) This resolution was duly adopted. x lk GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN � i q S . APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS _ — SCOTT L. HARRIS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman a y;s,,� 2o'"j ry'y{' Supervisor Charles Grigonis, Jr. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Serge Doyen, Jr. P.O. Sox 1179 Joseph H. Sawicki Southold, New York 11971 James Dinizio, Jr. BOARD OF APPEALS Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1809 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 Memo for the File Matter of Appl. No. 3967 - Kim Campbell 9/17/90 Called Mr. Albert of James Righter Architect' s Office to urge that he check with Town Trustees as to their jurisdiction since garage is shown to be 55+- feet from the marsh shown on the map. Mr. Albert indicated Doreen had called him already, and that he checked with Curt Horton, who told him he didn't need Trustees review because it was "salt walter" and not fresh water. Mr. Albert was again urged to check with Trustees since they were the only ones who could waive jurisdiction under the Trustees Code Ch. 97 (Wetlands) , and suggested that he received something in writing before he gets a building permit. Copies to ZBA Members and Campbell file for information and update. 1 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS - 1 4 SC013 L HARRIS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman yam.. . Supervisor Charles Grigonis, Jr. Sa Town Hail,53095 Main Road Serge Doyen, Jr. P_ Joseph H. Sawicki Southold, Box 91 James Dinizio, Jr. BOARD OF APPEALS Fax( New Yorkk 11971 az(5J6)765-1823 . Telephone(516) 765-1809 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone(516) 765-1800 August- 29, 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Our Regular Meeting of September 6, 1990 has been cancelled, we will be rescheduling another meeting date sometime in the middle of September. If you have any questions please call this department at (516) 765-1809. Yours very truly, Gerard P. Goehringer chairman By Doreen Ferwerda f Y.M. � �5.. `.e` .+y� i ,.+�• - k Y � r _ �Nkfr �e Y �9 �.w04. - �. tR ♦ T yy� —*��e Copies of Legal Notice to the following on or about Septem- ber 17, 1990: Mr. and Mrs. Harold Gordon 124 Hickory Avenue Southold, NY 11971 Mr. K.T. Grathwohl, Jr. Willow Pond Lane Southold, NY 11971 Mr. and Mrs. Peter Bloom 135 Pacific Street Brooklyn, NY 11201 Mr. and Mrs. Kenneth Minnick 3305 Aldrich Lane P.O. Box 201 Laurel, NY 11948 Mr. Jacobs Albert James V. Righter Architects, Inc. 58 Winter Street Boston, MA 02108 Environment East, Inc. 3075 Indian Neck Lane Peconic, NY 11958 Michael N. Hills, Esq. 206 Roanoke Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 Mr. James Fitzgerald Proper-T Services P.O. Box 617 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Philip J. Cardinale, Esq. Cardinale & Cardinale P.O. Box W Jamesport, NY 11947 Charles R. Cuddy, Esq. P.O. Box 1547 180 Old Country Road Riverhead, NY 11901 Mrs. Venetia McKeighan 495 Bay View Avenue Southold, NY 11971 w APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS '+ C} 1. SCOTT L_ HARRIS C Supervisor Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Town Hall,53095 Main Road Serge Doyen, Jr. P.O. Box 1179 Joseph H. Sawicki Southold, New York 11971 James Dinizio, Jr. BOARD OF APPEALS Fax(516)765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1809 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone(516) 765-1800 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed herewith as confirmation of the time, date and place of the public hearing concerning your application is a copy of the Legal Notice, as published recently in the Long Island Traveler-Watchman, Inc. and Suffolk Times, Inc. Please have someone appear in your behalf at the time specified in the event there are questions brought up during the same and in order to prevent a delay in the processing of your application. Your public hearing will not start before the times allotted in the attached Legal Notice. Please feel free to call our office prior to the hearing date if you have questions or wish to update your file. Yours very truly, GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN By Linda Kowalski APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS h � s4 r� .. SCOTT L. HARRLS Supervisor Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Gri onis, Jr. _ � . - Town Hall,53095 Main Road Serge Doyen, Jr. Y' P.O. Box 1179 Joseph H. Sawicki Southold, New York 11971 James Dinizio, Jr. BOARD OF APPEALS Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1809 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone(516)765-1800 NOTICE OF HEARINGS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the Code of the Town of Southold, the following hearings wi1-i be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS at a Regular Meeting, at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 on WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 1990, at the following times: .7:30 p.m. Appl. No. 3961 - VENETIA MCKEIGHAN. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-33 , as disapproved, for permission to construct an accessory structure (gazebo) in an area other than the required rear yard. Property location: 4135 Bayview Avenue, Southold, NY; County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 052, Block 05, Lot 23. ,s - Page 2 - Notice of Hearings Southold Town Board of Appeals Regular Meeting of September 26, 1990 7:35 p.m. Appl. No. 3962 - HAROLD GORDON. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XXIV, Section 100-244 B, as zli.sapproved, ±or permission to canstz=t an (deck) addition to existing residence. Proposed construction will have insufficient side yard setback(s) . Property Location: 124 Hickory Avenue, Southold, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 78, Block 7, Lot 50. 7:40 p.m. Appl. No. 3966 - PETER BLOOM. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III A, Section 100-30 A.3 , as disapproved, for permission to construct a deck addition to existing dwelling. Proposed construction will have insufficient side yard setbacks. Property location: 40 Old Shipyard Lane amd 580 L'Hommedieu, Southold; County Tax,Map No. 1000, Section 64, Block 2, Lot 53. 7: 45 p.m. Appl. No. 3964 - KENNETH MINNICK. Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 B(14) , as disapproved, for permission to establish accessory apartment in proposed addition to existing one-family dwelling structure. Property location: 3305 Aldrich Lane, Laurel, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 124, Block 1, lot 3.2. s Page 3 - Notice of Hearings Southold Town Board of Appeals Regular Meeting of September 26, 1990 7:50 p.m. Appl. No. 3967 - KIM CAMPBELL. Variance to the -----` i rzoning ordinance, Article III, Section 100-33, as disapproved, .for *�*m= =issloa to construct accessary garage in an area other / than the required rear yard area. Property Location: East End i Road, Fishers Island, NY; County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 004, fr, Block 004, Lot 016. 7:55 p.m. Appl. No. 3963 - FRANK CURRAN. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 A.4 (100-33) and Article XXIII , Section 100-239.4 B, as disapproved, for permission to construct an accessory building in an area other than the required rear yard area and with a setback of less than 75 ft. from, the bulkhead. Property Location: 780 Haywaters Road, (Peconic Bay Properties Subdivision), Cutchogue, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 111, Block 1, Lot 16. 8:00 p.m. Appl. No. 3960 - THOMAS & ALLISON SARGENT. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III A, Section 100-30 A.3, for approval of insufficient area, width and depth of parcels, each with an existing single-family dwelling, in this pending division or reseparation of merged properties, and for st Page 4 - Notice of Hearings Southold Town Board of Appeals Regular Meeting of September 26, 1990 approval of reduced yard setbacks between existing structures and property lines, as proposed. Proposed construction of new lots will have insufficient width, depth and total lot area for this district. Property Location: Private Road of Fox Avenue, Fishers Island, County Tax Map No. 1000 , Section 06, Block 06, Lot 07. 8:05 p.m. Matters of JAMES, PETER & CHRIS MESKOURIS. Appeals No. 3951 and 3957 - Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Article IIIA, Section 100-30 A.3, Article XXIII, Section 100-239. 4 (100-239d) , and Article III, Section 100-31A, for proposed deck construction which requires approval as to insufficient, sideyards, excessive lot coverage, and reduced setback from the minimum required ,from the ordinary highwater mark of Long Island Sound, and for approval of this substandard _parcel for dwelling use (as exists) (re-separate lots that are merged) . Property Location: 1350 Sound Beach Drive, Mattituck, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 106 , Block 1, Lot 36 and Lot 37. Page 5 - Notice of Bearings Southold Town Board of Appeals Regular Meeting of September 26, 1990 8:20 p.m. Appl. No. 3955 - DOMINICK SBLENDIDO & A. AUBICCHI0_ yari�e to the Zoning Ordinance, Article SII A, Sections 100-30A.2 (100-31A) and 100-30 A.3, Article XXIII, Section 100-230 (A) , for interpretation regarding second kitchen and for permit concerning addition to the existing one-family dwelling for use as a second dwelling unit. Property Location: 185 Inlet Lane, Greenport County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 43, Block 004, Lot 37. 8:55 p.m. Appl. No. 3938 - VILLAGE MARINE. Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XI, Section 100-112, Article XII, Section 1007111C(1) , Article XXIII, Section 239.4, and Article XIX, for permission to construct .eddition to existing principal building with insufficient setbacks from the bulkhead, the easterly (rear) Property line, maintaining the nonconforming northerly (side) setback, and to locate boat storage structure (boat rack) with insufficient setbacks from the northerly (side) , westerly, easterly property lines, and bulkhead. Also requested is relief, as may be deemed necessary concerning parking and/or landscaping under the current revisions of the site plan regulations. Zone District: Marine I (M-I) . Property location: James Creek, east side of Bay Avenue, ,Z Page 6 - Notice of Hearings Southold Town Board of Appeals Regular Meeting of September 26, 1990 Ratt].tuck, VY; County Tale 1a Distri.ct 1DDD, Section 122, Block 3 , Lot 15.1 The Board of Appeals will at , said time and place hear any and all persons or representatives desiring to be heard in each of the above matters. Written comments may also be submitted prior to the conclusion of the subject hearing. Each hearing will not start before time allotted. Additional time for your presentation will be available, if needed. For more information, please call 765-1809. Dated: September 6, 1990a �$Y ORDER.OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS GERARD P_ SOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN By Linda Kowalski ,�- C2 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 JUDITH T.TERRY v FAX(516)765-1823 TOWN CLERK TELEPHONE(516)765-1801 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM: JUDITH T. TERRY, SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK RE: ZONING APPEAL NO. 3967, KIM K. CAMPBELL DATE: AUGUST 7, 1990 Transmitted is application for variance submitted by James V. Righter Architects on behalf of KIM K. CAMPBELL together with letter of transmittal from James V. Righter Architects; notification to adjacent property owners; Zoning Board of Appeals Questionnaire form; Notice of Disapproval from the Building Department; letter authorizing James V. Righter Architects to apply on behalf of Kim K. Campbell; copy of Deed; short environmental assessment form; pictures of garage site; and copy of site plan. Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk 1-dr TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK AUG a `' APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR APPEAL NO. esiti Toit1a DATE 3.R..Ju1.y....l.S9.Q.. TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS,TOWN OFSOUTHOLD, N. Y. James Volney Righter Archit cts, Inc . 58 Winter St . 1, (We) .................................................................o ............................................................................ Name of Appellant Street and Number ....... ........ ...Bo.sto. . n. .MA ................HEREBY APPEAL TO .... ............................................................ .. .... Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR,ON APPLICATION FOR PERMIT NO. ..... DATED ....16 April 1990 ....................................... WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO James Vo,lney Righter Architects ,.. Inc . Name of Applicant for permit of 58 Winter St . Boston MA .................................................................................................................................. . Street and Number Municipality State ( ) PERMIT TO USE { ) PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY ( x) Building Permit 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY East End.... d : ,..Fishers Island , Resident .—ABric . Street /Hamlet / Use District on Zoning Map District 1000 Section 4 Block 4 L.ot. 16.. ...Current Owner Kim K. Campbell .... ...... ................................................ . . .... . lvlo..p No..... Lat Na.o Prior Owner Elliott Wadsworth 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) Article III Section 100-33 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for (please check appropriate box) (x ) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Low Chap. 62 Cons. Laws Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 ( ) 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal (haW as not) been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request for a varionce andwas made in Appeal No. ................................Dated ...................................................................... REASON FOR APPEAL ( ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 (x ) A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested for the reason that The owner would like to build a garage in the front yard . Form ZBI (Continue REASON FOR APPEAL Continued 1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties or unneces- sary HARDSHIP because Placing a garage in the rear yard would put it between the house and the shore, blocking the water view from the house . A garage between the house and the water would also have a more negative environmental impact than if it were on the landward side of the house (front yard) . 2. The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district because The Fishers Tsland Club, immediately across the road to the south , has a storage building in its front yard . The neighbors immediately to the west (Lot no . 1000-004-4-15) have a storage/utility building in their front yard . 3. The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because It is customary for houses on the shore to have garages and other auxiliary structures in front or side yards rather than on the water—side. STATE OF-W-EMYi`61?K ) . .A..( ... ... .. ............... ................... COUNTY OF sLF)ro I I( ) ss ( j Signs u e Sworn to this ..............3.f..s ................ day of.....v..�.Iyr ................................... 19PC- Notar,ygg A. A�Sg+j ?a � BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter or the Petition of Kim K. Campbell NOTICE TO to the Board of Appeals of The Town of Southold ADJACENT TO: FIDCO PROPERTY OWNER c/o Tom Doherty Fishers Island NY 06390 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold to request a Variance (�pYe1Er�IxBYc �a (8p06akRertau# ((XtQ*EXff) [circle choice] 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adjacent to your property and is des- cribed as follows: Suffolk Co. Tax Map no . 1000-004-4-16 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: Residential-Agricultural 4 That by such Petition, the undersigned will request the following relief: To be allowed to build a garage on the road-side of the house (in the front yard) . 5. That the provisions of the Southold Town Zoning Code applicable to the relief sought by the under- signed are Article III Section 100-33 [ ] Section 280-A, New York Town Law for approval of access over right(s)-of-way. 6. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road Southold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. (516) 7�5-1809. 7. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Board of Appeals; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Travel er-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices;that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: 30 July 1990 James Volney Righter Architects , Inc . Petitioner Owners ' Names : Kim K. Campbell Post Office Address 58 Winter St . Boston MA 02108 Tel . No . ( 617) 451-5740 [Copy of sketch or plan showing proposal to be attached for convenience purposes . ] FORM NO.3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD,N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL Date . . APRIL 16 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. To SAMES V. RIGHTER ARCH. INC. 58 WINTER ST. a/c MRS. KIM K. CAMPBELL BOSTON, MA. 02108 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application dated . . . . APRIL 6 19 90 for permit to CONSTRUCT A ONE CAR GARAGE , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , at Location of Property . . . EAST END FISHERS ISLAND No. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .H. . . .amlet. House County Tax Map No. 1000 Section . .004 , . . _ . . . . _ Block 004 . _ . . . . Lot . 016 Subdivision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Filed Map No. Lot No. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ACCESSORY BIIILDINGS CANNOT BE LOCATED IN A FRONT YARD, SHALL BE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LOCATED IN THE REAR YARD ONLY. 100-33 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., + . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i . . . . � Building •+lr�� . . CURTIS W. HORTON RV 1/80 617. 51=CR � '. AppenC G :. . _. Stale Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSGSSME:lT FOR31 For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I—PROJECT INFORMATION (To be eomnleted by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECTNAME James Vol Righter Architects , Iri . Campbell Garage 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Suffolk Mvn,nd,uty Town of Southold county 4. PRECISE LOCATION(street address and road intersections.prominent landmarks,etc.,or provide mapl - Eas-t End Rd . Fishers Island NY 5. 15 PROPOSED ACTION: IiSJ New ❑Eseanslon ❑tdodrticatlon/alleradon 6. OESCRT F PROJECT$RIEFLY: One-car garage 7. AMCU:IT OF LAND AFFECTED: Milially acres ultimately acres S. WILL PROPOSED ACTION CC.MPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER E)CISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS7 ❑Yes ©NO If No,describe briefly The garage -is proposed to be located in the front yard . 9. WYM�-T IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? L.J l Remacntlal [:]Industrial .❑CpmmCrdal ❑Agriculture ❑ParktFerestropen soace ®Dino oescmc: Residential-Agricultural ID. CCES AC.IC:1 IUVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL.OR FUNDING.NOW On ULTIhIArELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY(FEDERAL. STATE OR LCCAL)7 •t _ ©Yes ❑No If yes,list agency(s)and permdlapptovats Town of Southold building permit N. Y. State D.E.C. ruling of no jurisdiction It. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A GURRENTLY VAUD PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ED Yes ❑Ila I!yes,list agency name and permlUapproval N .Y . State D .E.C . ruling of no jurisdiction: Tidal Wetlands Dept . 1S. April 1990 ; Fresh Water Wetlands Dept.27 June SO 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOOEO ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMMAPPnOVAL REOURE 1,1001FICATION? ❑Ye+ QNo I CEnr1FY THAT THE INFORMArION PROVIDED AeovE is TnUE 10 THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ADDncamlmonso, name: James Volney Righter Architects , Inca 30 July h990 Data: Slonalurr: I) the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the CDaslat assessment form before proceeding with this assessment OVER l (Continued on reverse side) The Y.Y.S. £nviromm"ntal Quality Review Act reguzrns submission - Of thin term. and an environmental review will ue saaa Uy chiu .,aard before any action is taken. SIM;` £:NTP.0'!'1FNTAr. A55FSSNc`P^ rnit,1 . (a) in order to answer the questions in this short E;�F it is assumed that the preparer. will use currently available information concerning the project and the likely impacts of the action. Zt is not expected Chat additional studies, research or other invescigations will be undertaken. (b) rf any question has been answered Yes the project may be Sig- nificant and completed Environmenral Assessment Form is necessary. •_ (c) If all questions have been answered No it is likely that the project is not significant. (d) Envircnt. ental Assessment 1. Will project result in a larce physical chance to the project site or physically alter more than 10 acres of land? _Yes 1 ::0 2. Will there be a major chance to any unique or unusual land form on the site? Yes A :10 3. Will project alter or have a large effect on , an existing body at water? Yes �( No 4. Will project have a potentially large" impact an grounawacer quality? _Yes - :!o 5. Will project significantly effect drainage flow on adjacent sites? _Yes _2clo 6. Will oroject affect any threatened cc eadancered plant or animal species? _Yes X:io 7. Will project result in a major adverse effect on air quality? _Yes X:!o a. Will project. have a major effect on visual char- acter of the community or scenic views or vistas known to be imporcant to the community? —Yes }9( No � 9. . Will project adversely inoact any site or struct- ure of historic, pro-historic, or palcontologica C importance or any site designated as a critical environmental area by a local agency? Yes XNo 10. Will project have a major effect on existing or future recreational opportunities? _Yes 2LNo 11. Will project result in major traffic problems or " eauce a major effect to existing transportation syctcros? _Yes 1'e No 12. Will project regularly cause objectionable odors, noise, glare, vibration, at electrical discurb- ance as a result of the praiccc's operation? —Yes Na 13. Will project have any impact on public health or sarecy? _Yes -X:fo 14. Will project affect the exictinq communitY by directly causing a growth to permanent pp oula- tion of more tnan 5 percent over a one-year • .Yes -&:to period or have a major negative affect on Cho characcer of the cor..muntty or nerghbornood? 15. Is there public controversy concerning the pro]^ct? prcparer's Si' gnacurc: RQnrescnting; Kim K am bell , ow er vice; 30 July 1990 Zia yyl5 ��� QUESTIONNAIRE TO 3E COMPLETED AND SUB:IITTED WITH YOUR APPLICATIOiJ FO:&3S TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS Please complete, sign and return to the Office of the Board of Appeals with your completed application forms. If "Yes" is answered to any questions below, please be sure to depict these areas on your survey (or certified sketch) , to scale, and submit other supporting documenta- tion. 1. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? Yes No 2.a)Are there any areas which contain wetland grasses? (Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined by Town Code, Ch. 97 for your reference. ) Yes No b)Are there any areas open to a waterway without bulkhead? Yes o 3. Are there existing structures at or-below ground level, such as patios , foundations , etc? Yes No . 4. Are there any existing or proposed fences , concrete barriers, decks, etc? Yes No 5. If project is proposed for an accessory building or structure, is total height at more than 18 feet above average ground level? State total: 16:1 ft. Yes No 6. If project is proposed for principal building or structure, is total height at more than 35 feet above average ground level? State total:' ft. N.A• Yes NO 7. Are there other premises under your ownership abutting this parcel? If yes, please submit copy of deed. Yes No 8. Are there any building permits pending on this parcel (or abutting land under your ownership, if any) ? Yes No State Permit # and Nature: Wq�}tki r1rt�Yirn aE MBA. +0 t..{Raw r - -o ,. :Eta-64r �....,1._ 9 . Do state whether or not applications are pending concerning these premises before any other department f or agency (State, Town, County, Village, etc. ) : Planning Board Yes o Town Board Yes ON Town Trustees Yes No County Health Department Yes N Village of Greenport Y s o N.Y. S.D.E.C. J1-r-1d.v6.J ha )WTJ.Jd4HM`t M A" rZtC Ye No Other! Yes o 10. Is premises pending a sale or conveyance? If yes, please submit copy of names or purchasers and conditions of sale. (from contract) Yes iIo 11. Is new construction proposed in the area of contours J at 5 feet or less as exists? Yes No 12. If new construction is proposed in an area within 75 feet of wetland grasses, or land area at an eleva- tion of five feet or less above mean sea level, have you made application to the Town Trustees for an inspection for possible waiver or permit under the requirements of Ch. 97 of the Town Code? Yes No 13. Please list present use or operations conducted upon the subject property at this time $iu�(�. (=�,,,,H',,�.4 a�irw Vae ka7t.t4 and proposed $A.H.�... --� Please submit photographs for the record. I certify that the above statements are true and are being submitted for , reliance by the Board of Appeals in considering my application. �ignaturc{ �( Ul�utnorazed Agent) 1/88 �l Mrs . Rolla Campbell 1530A Cypress Dr . Jupiter FL 33469 30 July 1990 Board of Appeals Town of Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold NY 11971 Gentlemen: James Volney Righter Architects , Inc . have my permission to apply on my behalf for a variance to build a garage on my property on Fishers Island , Suffolk Co . Tax Map no. 1000-004- 4-16 . Very truly yours , CU%L 1� Kim K . Campbell ' JAMES V. RiGHTERtARC( _ "ITS ���4 J � musomv o44a� ��., o BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02108 DATE JOB NO. (617) 451.5740 gTTEN TI 3 August 1 0 ON RE: TO Southold Town Board of Appeals Kim K . Campbell Main Road — State Road 25 Garage Fishers Island Southold , L . I . , New York 11971 > WE ARE SENDING .YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via. the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION $150 filing fee ; Application for variance (3 copies) ; Notice to neighbors (2) ; Z .B . A . questionnaire ; Notice of disapproval ; Owner ' s authorization ; Copy of deed to property ; Short Environmental Assessment form; Photographs of staked site ; Plans of proposed garage ; Site plan/survey (4 copies) . THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS Enclosed : Application for zoning variance to build a one—car garage in the front yard for Kim K . Campbell on Fishers Island . COPY TO SIGNED: Jacob Albert raooucrznazmc ulgl. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ma 4a Q'••I 2p 3 _ O O t, m t _ t f v iim V1 i o.. 5 �''OQ wEa� BO R.D.BI 0-1 t o > O <-STAT! OF 460090 ty, COUNTY OF Y'7'/44T4!a �SS: STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF � � SS: , r'-On the I day of ,Jr19 r'j U,before me On the day of 19 ,before me personally came EDWARD R,.. v6ki..'And, MARY S. personally came HOWE, his wife, �.to me known to be the individuals ,fles,eribed:•in and who to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing inWumen, and-ack'ri6v!edged that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that 1� they executed the same.,' \ - executed the same. -_ � 11-f A.tL •�� STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF as: STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF SS: On the day of 19 ,before me On the day of 19 ,before me personally came personally came to me known, who, being by me duly sworn;did depose and the subscribing witness to the foregoing instrument, with sa_v that he resides at No. - whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me duly that he is the sworn,did depose and say that he resides at No. < of that he'knows - the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he to be the individual knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed described in and who executed the foregoing instrument; to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so that he, said subscribing witness, was present and saw affixed by order of the board of directors of said corpora- execute the same;and that he,said witness, tion, and that .he signed:h name thereto by like order. at the.same time subscribed h name as witness thereto. Bargain and OmU Urea WITH COVENANT AGAUsST,.GRANTOk's Aars. SECTION TITLE NO. I�. O�CE7 BLOCK LOT EDWARD R. HOWE�.and MARY S. HOWE,ux TO xaxat•xWfula TOWN of Southold .- , County of Suffolk KIM CAMPBELL - Accorded at Request of CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SrpNNpRN FORM OF XEI9TRflE ROp0.a OF TITLE UNDERWRITERS Return by Mail to Distributed by Herbert S. Grossman, Esq. C8[CAGO TITLS -" 29th Floor INSURANCE COMPANY 30 Broad Street New York, N.Y. 10004Eip N. .O .. It �y Z !4r,Y"SC%�Yi 0 U C Q R�'GEIVE $.....�..�P.-�J..-U(� m Jn uanoo x,�_J.�t. � REAL r-s 1 A0= MAR C980 D I d N it "'d TfL'4N5FfR PAX ; F ,FxJ�18 7 E .1 '.11.rn: . N11 1 11, x v CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING //THIS INSTRUMEla "YSIHSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED BY LAWYERS ONLY THIS INDENTURE, mad, the 141— day of ///' nineteen hundred and BETWEEN EDWARD R. HOWE and MARY S. HOWE', his wif6ltoth resiing at 64 Jerry Daniels Road, Marlborough, Connecticut 06447, �y party of the first part,and KIM CAMPBELL, residing. at 352 Center Island Road, Oyster Bay, New York 11771, 2-J '�ISTRICT: 1000 party of the second part, SECTION: W ITNESSETH,that the party of the first part,in consideration of ten dollars and other valuable consideration 05.00 paid by the party of the.second part,does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part,the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, BLOCK: ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, 01.00 lying and being in the Town of Southold, on Fishers Island, County of Suf£oll LOT: and State of New York, and bounded and described as follows: 004.000 BEGINNING at a monument set on the southerly line or side of a 40 foot private road, which monument is situate South 20.01 feet and West 550.35 feet from the. U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Triangu— lation Station "East End 2" and running thence from said point of beginning South 15 degrees 18 minutes 00 seconds.East .250.35 feet to a point; running thence North 84 degrees 55 minutes 20. seconds .-1 West 227.99feet to a point; running thence North 39 degrees 14 minutes 10 seconds West 63.26 feet to a point and the southeasterly line or side of said 40foot private road; running thence north— . C�D easterly the following three (3) courses and distances along the south®asterly line or side of said private road;. (1) North 35 degrees 56 minutes 00 seconds East 80.94 feet; (2) on the arc of acurve to the right with a radius of. 280.21 feet and whose chord is South 54 degrees 04 minutes 00 seconds East., 170.06 feet to a point and (3) North 70 degrees 42 .minutes 20 seconds East 20.32 feet to the monument set at the point or place of BEGINNING. - Together with any easement appurtenant to the premises above described for ingress to and egress from said premises .over and along such private roads as row or may hereafter exist connecting the said premises with the public highway. Together with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the Grantors in and to said premises. TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever. '<. AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything ) whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever,except as aforesaid. l� AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law,covenants that the party of V - the firs: part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consid- eration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply -� the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the Same for any other purpose. The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties"whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: Edward R. Howe Mary S. we so(j SMMLLCE. (7� STGaIE' Ta1uDA \ \.O�l� ? SPP_LLnr.ew fl.e s ke c C fir$ d vp a vvAlveoLp faa � o Cou'regL vnLve ' Parking Area .lea. .. - p C01.11Yq, vume fe.e ua� e � u.e Ya / [ ALvFF- CENTE RLME I ` EA MENT +�. UNDERGRDUND na / ; n TELEPHONE 5 nt 13, (approx. keatan I 1 ' 1 f i LI I I � Ic 0�1 \ A Lf i EAST aQ WEST t r `6 FtI! -HMS • iSLAf.!?> � # { -fames Volney Righter . * h� AVIAM �-Q'- " k,�. .a . i Fill � I 1 i i I; F t I F1-AN ` 11c�2?H az SQUTH cLEVA-DoO t J II r l T :3•� n m r0 a `� I„ `� � D Z Ln s \ A m Z T 1 on V, Y MI n O O z = �y' D D m < O m m 4'1 `n n fir- m O w Z Z 973 J4,-,i __ .Fe m aLUr c •�' P j `� Z w ® i 1 i S n � i r Bruce Anderson Environmental Consultant December 15 , 1990 John Bredemeyer, President Southold Board of Trustees Town Hall P . 0 . Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 DEC 1 8 i Re. Kim Campbell - Fishers Island � ��� Dear Mr . Bredemeyer - Please be advised that the field inspection for the above referenced project scheduled for December 14 , 1990 was cancelled by the applicant ' s agent, James Volney Righter Inc. Field inspection has been rescheduled for December 27 , 1990. Sincerely, Bruce Anderson CC. Jacob D . Albert , James Volney Righter 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 James V ®lney Righter i � 28 a r c h i t e c t s ,at o 10 E 25 January 1991 Board of Town Trustees Town Hall 53095 Main Rd. Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 Re: Kim K. Campbell garage, Fishers Island Attention: John M. Bredemeyer Dr . and Mrs. Campbell have been discouraged by the mounting expenses of consultants , surveyors, and architects. Without getting a new survey of the whole site, if there is anything more your board can do based on Bruce Anderson's report and your own site visit, we would appreciate it . Please advise. Very truly yours , \ Jacob Albert M 6� - �s f_ a 3o Jacob D. A l b e r € • James V. R ig h t e r • Brooke S. T r i v a s • Cynthia N. Wardell 58 Winter Street • Boston . M[assachusetts • 02108 , telephone • 617 • 451 > 5740 Bruce Anderson Environmental Consultant January 5 , 1990 Mr . John Bredemeyer , President Southold Board of Trustees Town Hall P. 0. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 JAN 9 Dear Mr. Bredemeyer, Attached is the natural resources report and map showing the approximate locations of •the various habitats found on site for the Campbel project at Fishers Island. Sincerely, Bruce Anderson 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 lei �J Bruce Anderson Environmental Consultant Natural Resources Report Project name: Kim K. Campbell Project location: East End Road aAN 4 Fishers Island SCTM#; 1000-004-4-16 Project proposal: The applicant proposes to construct a garage and pool on lands adjacent to tidal wetlands . Description of site: Subject parcel contains 4.34 acres and is situated on the shorefront of Fishers Island Sound. The northern portion of the site fronts the Fishers Island Sound and its shoreline is characterized and regulated as coastal shoals , bars and mud flats the extent of which is marked at the high water line. In ecological terms , this area is more aptly described as rocky intertidal. Rocky intertidal habitats are regarded as among the most diverse of shoreline habitats . The southeastern portion of the site fronts a tidal wetland system which extends southwards to East End Road. In all, the tidal wetlands appears to be roughly 8 acres in size. The low marsh area of this wetlands supports the low marsh cordgrass, Spartina alterniflora. Landward of this area , spikegrass , Disticulis spicata and the salt meadow grass, Spartina patens are found. The high marsh is dominated by marsh elder , Iva frutescens and groundsel bush, Baccharis halimifolia. Flags placed in the field for wetland delineation were placed on groundsel bush. Rip rap is found along the shoreline extending from the east from approximately the location of the existing cottage westward to the adjacent parcel now or formally owned by Balcom. South along the Balcom property subject property extends eastwards to the Fishers Island Development Corporation' s Golf Course. Within this triangular portion of the property, a small depression is found. While water appears to collect within this depression the predominant plants present are considered to be upland species. Plants found within the depression include a. variety of brambles including black raspberry, and blackberry and other plants including switchgrass , chokecherry and multiflora rose. This habitat provides nesting habitat for a variety of small birds as bird nests were observed. Thickets are found surrounding the bluffs facing both wetlands and surface waters . Finally , a dirt road used to access the Balcom property bisects this portion of the property. 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 The remainder of the property is primarily lawn areas which include a putting green east of the existing dwelling. Except for the putting green, lawn areas appear to have been only minimally fertilized if at all . Additionally , only a minimum (,if any) herbicides have been applied to these lawn areas as its composition appears to contain mostly fescues, rye grass, various weeds , clover and lesser amounts of bluegrass . Potential Environmental Impacts: The potential short term environmental impacts caused by the construction of a pool and garage are erosion and destruction of natural vegetation. As previously described natural vegetation is found within the wetland area as flagged, along the perimeter of the bluff , and easterly portion of the property. Clearing impacts can be entirely avoided by placing the pool and garage on the turfed portions of the property. The excavation of primarily the swimming pool has the potential for causing erosion particularly_ during the period when soils are stockpiled._ The use of barriers including haybales and silt fences and the like can prevent the movement of these soils into low lying areas. The long term impacts caused by the existence of a pool and garage are the discharge of pool waters into wetlands, natural areas and surface waters , and increased runoff caused by greater impervious surfaces_ (garage roof) . The direct discharge of pool waters into wetlands and surface waters are of particular concern since many of the chemicals used in swimming pools including chlorine , chlorine stabilizers , and algaecides are toxic to a wide variety of wildlife . The impacts related to pool pumpout can be greatly mitigated by use of a dry well to receive pool pumpout . Runoff causedby greater impervious surfaces can likewise be mitigated by the use of gutters , downspouts and drywelis . It is recognized that stormwater generally infiltrates more slowly on Fishers Island than on Long Island because the predominant soils are typically finer than the course textured sands covering most of Long Island. Recommendations: The application as submitted should be regarded as incomplete because the survey does not indicate the exact location of the wetlands. These wetlands have since been flagged in ;the field. Also, the Trustee regulations governing wetlands permits require the survey to show topography at one foot intervals . While it is my opinion that two foot intervals are sufficient for analyzing potential erosion impacts to wetlands , the Board should. decide whether two foot intervals are sufficient for their 475 Rambler Road, Southold, IVY 11971 (516) 765-4071 consideration. Accordingly the Board should issue a waver of this requirement in writing to the applicant if it finds that two foot contours are sufficient for their regulatory purposes . I recommend that a survey showing the exact location of the wetlands , topography and all existing and proposed structures be submitted with a new wetlands application. In addition, I recommend that a new EAF Part one be submitted with the wetlands application since the previously filled out EAF occurred during a time when only a garage was proposed. Both the garage and swimming pool should be should be placed in the turfed areas of the property . The survey submitted by the applicant for the Board' s consideration showed both the garage and swimming pool to be placed on the turfed area directly south of the existing dwelling and east of the existing driveway. In doing so the setback from the wetlands was approximately 50 feet. I have suggested that the orientation of the swimming pool may be rotated 90 degrees as to achieve a greater setback from the wetland as previously proposed. It is recognized that the placement of the garage must take into account the necessary turning radius of a car from the driveway and thus should not be located directly adjacent to the existing driveway. The erosion potential as related primarily to the excavation for the swimming pool may be controlled by the placement of haybales and silt fence around the perimeter of the project area. Haybales should be firmly staked into place. All excavated soils should be removed from the project site and placed in a suitable upland location. Increased runoff as created by the garage should be controlled through the use of gutters , downspouts and drywells . The pool should be serviced using a drywell. The drywell should be located away from wetlands and indicated on the approved survey. The exact size of the drywell is essentially an engineering question. However , given the predominant soils occurring in this area, it is anticipated that the drywell should be fairly large in size. 475 Rambler Road, Southold, h'Y 11971 (516) 765-4071 i Bruce Anderson Environmental Consultant December 29 , 1990 John Bredemeyer , President c _ ,. Southold Board of Trustees Town Hall � t P. 0. Box 1179JAN - 3 Southold, NY 11971 Re. Kim Campbell 0 U'7l Fishers Island Dear Mr . Bredemeyer, I have reviewed the file on the above referenced project and can find no complete application which includes { a swimming pool. Accordingly, I have advised the 7 t applicant ' s agent that they should resubmit an application ) 'g for a wetlands permit. Said application should contain a survey showing two foot topographical contours , the location of the wetlands as flagged in the field, and all proposed r structures . In addition , all application forms including the EAF should likewise be submitted. It appears that the proposed swimming pool may also need Zoning Board approval. I have suggested that applications for a zoning variance and a wetlands permit may y be submitted simultaneously by the applicant. On December 27 , 1990 , a field inspection was made of the premises . Wetlands were delineated at that time. A natural resources report is in preparation at this time and will shortly be completed for the Board' s review. i Sincerely, Bruce Anderson 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 Bruce Anderson - Environmental Consultant December 31 , 1990 Jacob D . Albert �� (;+ `� ` i James Volney Righter, Architects , Inc. E ` 58 Winter Street Boston Massachusetts 02108 ?r' H _ Res Kim K. Campbell , Fishers Island 7Cs7s fsw :€ f Dear Mr. Albert, V It is estimated that the total cost in connection with the above referenced project is $ 560.00 . These costs include the field inspection which took place on December 272 1990 and the preparation of a natural resources report on the project. Sincerely, Bruce Anderson CC . John Bredemeyer, President Southold Board of Trustees X. 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 Y� .X r r / Y y k - ta l.T' yq SEAR 617.21 Appendix H State Environmental Quality Review Notice of Completion of Draft/Final EIS Project Number Date This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law. A ❑Draft or ❑Final (check one) Environmental Impact Statement has been completed and accepted by the as lead agency, for the proposed action described below. Comments on the Draft EIS are requested and will be accepted by the contact person until Name of Action: I i Description of Action: j I i I I i i i Location: (Include street address and the name of the municipality/county.A location map of appropriate scale is also recommended.) Bruce Anderson Environmental Consultant December 31 , 1990 Jacob D . Albert James Volney Righter, Architects , Inc. 58 Winter Street Boston, Massachusetts 02108 Re: Kim K. Campbell, Fishers Island Dear Mr. Albert, It is estimated that the total cost in connection with the above referenced project is $ 560.00 . These costs include the field inspection which took place on December 27 , 1990" and the preparation of a natural resources report on the project. Sincerely, Bruce Anderson cc. John Bredemeyer, President Southold Board of Trustees 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 Bruce Anderson Environmental Consultant December 15 , 1990 John Bredemeyer , President Southold Board of Trustees Town Hall P. 0. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re. Kim Campbell - Fishers Island Dear Mr. Bredemeyer , Please be advised that the field inspection for the above referenced project scheduled for December 14, 1990 was cancelled by the applicant ' s agent, , James Volney Righter Inc. Field inspection has been rescheduled for December 27 , 1990. c Sincerely, Br�ucee Anderson cc. Jacob D . Albert , James Volney Righter 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Region 1 Headquarters SUNY, Building 40, Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 n Thomas C. Joriing Date: /fi t 199Q Commissioner To: JAME5 V K1cfl re kif_,t 1TEGT� 5a WIN STKOE7' o ro T M A oz i ot, F-TTN M& JArcoL D. Aw5w RT Representing: K11,4 K . CFlMPP�Et�i� UPh H'J 38' (Z`I' l 1167MINDI.EhGH gyp. N. PArW : I%L_ 3��to6 Dear MR . 44Beg f' In response to your request for a freshwater wetlands determination for the property identified below, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation has determined that the parcel is more than 100 feet from regulated freshwater - wetlands. Therefore, no permit is required under the Freshwater Wetlands Act (Article 241of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law) . Location: _ ( 1✓M[� �pA� 12'S �SI� ND Tax Map Number: 1000 -_ q Please be advised that this letter does not relieve you of the responsibility of obtaining any necessary permits or approvals from other agencies. Very truly yours, f ' i Christine J. Costopoulos Deputy Regional Permit.-Administrator CC: ftKiahLt of ENVlKCrtMettfkL Q9DTr�IOH Cr RDL p 41,m A COMLOG © PAPLOG © MAP 1 CARD FILE New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Region 1 Headquarters V SUNY,Building 40, Stony Brook, NY 11794 DATE: a ` y Re. Thomas C-Joriin P Commissioner Dearer �✓ � " A review has been made of your proposal to: tco�C � 141 L l Based on the information you have submitted, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation has determined that the parcel _ project is Greater than 300 ' from inventoried tidal wetlands. - Landward of a substantial man-made structure greater than 100 ' in length which was constructed prior to 9/20/77 . Landward of the 10 ' above mean sea level elevation contour on a gradual, natural slope. - Landward of the topographic crest of a: bluff, cliff or dune which is greater than 10 ' in elevation above mean sea level . Therefore, no permit is required under the Tidal Wetlands Act (Article 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law) . Please be advised, however, that no construction, sedimentation or disturbance of any kind may take place seaward of the 10 ' contour or topographic crest without a permit. it is your responsi-bility to ensure that all necessary precautions are taken to prevent any sedimentation or other alteration, or disturbance to the ground ,surface or vegetation in this area as a result of your project. Such precautions may include providing adequate work area between the 10 ' contour or topographic crest and the project (i .e. a 15' to 20 ' wide construction area) or erection of a temporary fence, barrier, or hay bale berm. Please note that any additional work, or modification to the project as described, may, require authorization by this Department. Please contact this office if such arr contemplated. Please be further advised that this letter does not relieve you of the responsibility of obtaining any necessary permits or approvals from other agencies. Very truly yours,, (. Deputy Regional Permit Administrator James Volney Righter a r C h 1 t e c i s Nov 1 4l1 i n C u AWN OF SOUTP�Ow 12 November 1990 John Bredemeyer III Board of Town Trustees Town Hall 53095 Main Rd. Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 Re: Kim K. Campbell garage, Fishers Island Dear Mr. Bredemeyer : Enclosed you will find a completed Full Environmental Assessment form. I am also submitting copies of the zoning variance approval , granted to allow the garage in the front yard , and letters of no jurisdiction from thh DEC. The DEC letter makes reference to the new garage and also to an addition to an existing guest cottage, which is not being done now. I am sure that the Campbells would be willing to do whatever planting is necessary between the garage and the wetlands if that will allow the garage to be a bit closer to the wetlands than the normal 75 ft . setback. Very truly yours , / 7 Jacob Albert Jacob D. Albert ^ James V. Righter • Brooke S. Trivas o Cynthia N. Wardell 58 Winter Street . Boston > Massachusetts • 02108 • telephone . 617 • 451 . 5740 44.1�--2 (2187)--7c - 617.21 3 SEQ L 6' Appendix A K.' NOV �� State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENviRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR � OF UTi: 1 Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner,whether a projee or action maybe significant.The questionof whether an action may significanris notalways easy toanswer. Frequen ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or'unmeasureabte:-it is also understood that those who determin significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert inenvironmente analysis. In addition,many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns afIectin the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determinatio process has been orderly,comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a projector action Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Fart 1: 'Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic projec data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. it provide, guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whetherit is a potentially large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large; then Part 3 is used4o evaluatewhether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION Or SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify.the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 OPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ -B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there'will not be a significant effect r this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefor CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.`: C. The Project result in one or more large and importantimpactsthat may have a ignfficant impact `on the environme therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. a. A Conditioned Negative De ration is only valid for Unlisted Actions V §11 f Name of Action �✓h/-�`r.,s reel Name of Lead Agency Print or r e Name of R�nstble Officer in Lead Agency Title of Nv+ponsibie Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Pre•parer(If different from responsible officer) r Date 1 PANT 1—PROJECT MFG AATION , o: Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions Will be cons: as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review.Provide any addi information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. _ It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not ir, new studies,research or investigation.if information requiring such additional work is unavailable.so indicate and s) each instance. NAME OF ACTION Kim K. Cd-, Iaall � acSc LOCATION OF ACTION(include Street Address,Municipality and County) F-45t- F= l RJ- f-ok rs ts(A-,A-tf 5� Nw1�Cv SV��OU� � A� � NAMEZAPP,LICA . BUSINESS TELEPHONE SES ONSOR ADDRESS CITYIPO .STATE ZIP CODE (✓oSFc v "Yi ds ®TiOF NAME OF OWNER(if different) a3{i5iNE96TELEPHONE Kim K. 12Ri! 671 ADDRESS 257 `Jukb Rom( CITYIPO € STATc' ZIP CODE. Fe-I V,,i a i f'L-. �334 SQ rDESCRIPTION OF ACTION o-anc I - • i Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑industrial ❑Commercial 15,Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-fr ❑Forest UAgricuiture -❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: `k 3 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Akeadoswr Brushland (Non-agricultural) 1. 34 acres acre Forested ® acres o acre Agricultural (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) O acres ® acre Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) P.30 acres f 3o acre- water Surface Area a acres acre• Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) t o .Z® acres ' �•'� acre Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces tt 0.2.0 acres 0� Z.I acre, other (Indicate type) IAWti 1� 1. 3a acres l acre, 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? 9 rzt. I /54.,..,( a. Soil drainage: JEWell drained 100 % of site CModerately well drained P5 of site OPoorly drained 0S of site b. if any agricultural land is involved,how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 throggh 4 of the N Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NIYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on Droject site? - Oyes IRNo a. What is depth.to bedrock? (in feet) 2 S. 'Approximate percentage of ( iosed project site with slopes: E30.10% \ °o ❑io-15% 015% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to; or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the Nation: Registers of Historic Places? DYes INNo 7. is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Dyes RN 8• What is the depth of the water table?Z 11 (in feet) _ . 9.-Is site located over,a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Dyes MNo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? QYes DNo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered ❑Yes ONo According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other ,geological formations Dyes EKNo Describe- 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area Dyes IBNo . if yes, explain 1:4Qes the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? Eyes DNo Pra,p,4--J (`"Jc-er Site- p.ed,;ees leR.st' Pees t>a ta. 4•.yr u..a-(' o-}, vt���-S Streams within or contiguous to project area: tJ.A- a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name fe 51 (♦ /yw. l t3l�efJ �3Lz „s/ SQahcl b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? 9Yes ❑No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? 19Yes DNo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? DYes ZNo i8- Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA Section 303 and 3047 El Yes ®No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRRb17? Eyes DNo All aF FeSke-+-s lsLo-YJ :" 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Dyes HNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a, Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: u.A• acres initially; iQ A. acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped tJ rA. acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N •A• (If appropriate) e. If the..project is an expansion,'indicate percent of expansion proposed N A. •"5; I. Number of off-street parking spaces existing, 14•fl• ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour N. A: .(upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two family Multiple Family Condominium Initially. ✓' Ul[unatcly r is Dimensions (in reet) of largest proposed structure I& height; IG r width; length. i.. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? IJ-A° 3 � How much natural material (' ' rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from site? tonslcubic yards ( 3 �V ill disturbed areas be reclaimed? Eyes ONo ON/A �— a. If yes,for what intend__ purpose is the site being reclaimed? .Sf#c. wtlf 6� refwa.J #a avdel4„� ¢ S1•�F�, M'1{i s'h• t4•ee e,rl�EE,j. ha eQ.�xoe e b: Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? SlYes DNo �- ���ate, c. Will upper subsoil bestockpiled for reclamation? lKYes I DNo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other_localiy-i,-aportant vegetation be removed by this project? Dyes ®No 6. If single phase project Anticipated period of construction months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated IJ A (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ONO 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes ,KNO : 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 3` ''q ; after project is complete 10 Number of jobs eliminated by this project O -11, Will project require relocation of:any projects or facilities? Dyes 9(No If yes, explain 12. is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes @No" mot. a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 1 —,fl 13. s subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? .Oyes IIN '. Type 01 surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes BNo Explain 15. Is project or.any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Dyes ONo. Se-a e.,•t'lZ�. 16, Will the project generate solid waste? Dyes RNo a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used?' Dyes Cl No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes ❑No e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes JKNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. if yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Oyes CKNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? OYes EKNo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Dyes ®,,No 21. will project result in an increase in energy use? ❑Yes. (KNo if yes , indicate "type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity A. gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 0 gallons/day. 24 Does project.involve Local. State orFederal-funding? , Yes RNo It 'Yes, explain - 4 '25.'Approvals.Required: - Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board Dyes ONO City, Town, Village Planning Board Dyes ONO City, Town Zoning Board Dyes ONO City, County Health Department ❑Yes ONO Other Local Agencies Dyes ❑Noy Other Regional Agencies Dyes ONO State AgenciesDyes ONO Federal Agencies ❑Yes ONO C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? .Yes ONO _ If Yes, indicate decision required: 9ru ` riA to ZS 5c wtt* t r7r"*"y� �t°� ryr c�• ❑zoning amendment 19zoning variance ❑special use.permit ❑subdivision Mite plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? P`t-s(c4e+ t aI ' /k*j✓z`c�tf ^"�I 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4, What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N.A. 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in'adopted local land use plans? IKYes ❑r 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1,14 mile radius of proposed action? tt J lx e�✓i c ttw 4 8- Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/4 mile? (>KYes ❑� 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 'h a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? lo- Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes CNo 1l. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, polic fire protection)? Dyes ONO a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Dyes ❑No - 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes ` 99N� a: If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Dyes ONO D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adver impacts associated with your proposal, please disatss such impacts and the measures which You propose to mitigate avoid them: E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant;Sponsor Name ..J Vot L,� M✓ Anc ft-4-5 U-c Date II'l2- 9 O Signatu �. 'Title eves cu-l- If the ac n s in the Coastal Area,and you are a state agency,complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceedin with this assessment. - - 5 Pact 2—rR{1 "ECT Mi MACTS AND T' 1R NIAGNiT'UDZ Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • in completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations E reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large(column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significa Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 sir- asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshodr magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and)or lower thresholds may be appropn for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary, Therefore, the examples are illustrative ; have been offered as guidance.They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each quest: • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumiative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a: Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of t impact- If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided,check column 2. If impact will occur but threshc is lower than example, check column 1: . d, if reviewerhas doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by changes) in the project to a small to mode,: impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. Ti must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Ee IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Chang. 1 will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site?. ONO VYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. , • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 3 feet: • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ [Dyes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes .that would remove more.than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • .Construction-orexpansion of sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑No • Construction in a designated,floodway. ❑ 0 ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts C6>Sf"r���� GdJaRa�t &'Lea 42 L ❑ ClYes ❑No 2. Will there be aneifect tf. ...ry un,que or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e-, cliffs, dunes, geological formations.etc.WNO ❑YES • Speciiic- land forms-: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6 f 1 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact P Moderate Large Mitigated 6 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Chan (Under Articles 15,24,25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ONO S$,6TES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a. ❑__ " ❑ ❑Yes ON protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON • Other_impacts: sF 111VDtA-6- '('41-7 i /Ad 6Q01 f 4 4b,-/ ,f ❑ ❑Yes ❑N 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? 4KNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of anybody of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N� or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N� • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑N, 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater . equality or quantity? DNO qYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON, • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does .not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N, have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed.Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑. ❑Yes ON gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N, ,supply system. .. . • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc do notexist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 ;gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc day. • Proposed Action will like!v cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc existing body of water to tr:_extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural Conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage.of petroleum or. chemical ❑ ❑- ❑Yes. ❑Nc products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and!or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment andfor storage facilities.• Other impacts: i c J �Z� CYes ❑No 6 Will proposed action alter drain.ige flow or patterns, or surface water runorr? j$NO —_YES Examples that would apply to column 2 + Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ C] ❑Yes ❑,No 7 =PotentialCani,,im Small to Moderate ,_Impact c • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON, • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N: Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑N< • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ - ❑Yes ❑M IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? -41NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ C]Yes ONO hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 Ibs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ Dyes []No to industrial use. Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No development within existing industrial areas.Other impacts: ❑u' ❑ ❑Yes ONO_ IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8 Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ONO YES Examples that would apply to column Z a • Reduction of one ormore species listed on the New York or federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. r• Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ []Yes []No !!! ,than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: Cd's8wc� /7l As� ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No `) Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non endangered speeies? ONOES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ Cl Yes ❑No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres El Yes ❑No, of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vc do 9 IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES to Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? J�NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ 11 Dyes ❑No land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ }❑Yes ❑No agricultural land. • The proposed actiomwould irreversibly convert more than,10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches,' strip cropping), or create need for such measures (e.g, cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposedaction affect aesthetic resources? ONO ZYES (if necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section`617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made of natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource., • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. •.Other impacts: _,la�)G'��' deJidl.�/�a m:�'�zv �wd�l ❑ ❑Yes ❑No. IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ITNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 •`Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Ye5 ❑No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project site.. _ • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. •.Other impacts: ❑ •❑ _Oyes [No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will.Proposed Action affect the quantity or duality of existing or future open spaces or recreational Opportunities?. Examples that would apply to column 2 'ONO DYES •. The permanent foreclosure of future recreational opportunity,. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • A major reduction of an open space important to the.community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑,No • Other impacts: - ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can impact 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Moderate Large Mitigated S -ONO OYES Impact Impact Project Chan Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ :❑- Fives ON • Other impacts-. ` ❑ -0 ❑Yes ON IMPACT ON ENERGY g 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? -ONO OYES €xamples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation orextension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑Yes. ON transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? 210NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Ni facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N� • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local Q ❑ El Yes ❑Ne ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural }farriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N( noise screen • Other impacts-. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ZNO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑Yes- : ❑�c substances(i.e.oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑Nc form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) - - • Storale facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No " gas or other flammable liquids.. _ • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ :❑Yes . ONO within 2,000'feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous. .waste: • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nd 10 1 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact BE OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact impact Project Change ,@NO DYES Examples.that would apply.to column 2 _ • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No project is located:is likely,togrow by more than 5% • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No will increase by more than'5% per year as a result of this project • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • :Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will created demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set.an important'precedent for future.projects. ❑. - ❑ ❑Yes []No • Proposed'Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ 11 ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 19. is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ZNO DYES If .any, action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3-2-VALUATION OF THE INIPOPTANCEE OF IMP;=.,TS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may b mitigated. ".Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project changes 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. ' To answer the question of importance, consider. • The probability of the impact occurring, • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of Value • .Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals - - • Whether known objections to. the,project relate to this Impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 �., tata.u:z 7-eC 617.21 ' \ Sc{�R Appendix 8 State Environmental Quality Review Is Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 1 I of Part 2 of the Full EAF. .(To be completed by Lead,Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0.1/a '/a-1/2 1/2-3 3-5 5+ • A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available Cl ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ❑ ❑---- ❑ ❑ ❑ observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the National or State ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Registers of Historic Places? • State Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • The State Forest Preserve? Cl ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges?' ❑ ❑ ❑ Cl ❑ • National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ -natural features? i • National Park Service lands? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or Recreational? • Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? • A governmentally established or designated interstate ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? • A site, area; lake, reservoir or highway designated as ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ scenic? • Municipal park, or designated open space? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • County road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ State? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Local road? ❑ Cl . Cl ❑, C1 1 j 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e.. screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) Oyes ❑No 3. Are any of the resources checked in question i used by the public during the time'-of year during 'which the project will be visible? - - Eyes CNo DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From-each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within g *'/4 mile *1 mile Ry Essentially undeveloped © Q Forested El 11 Agricultural El 01 Suburban residential � Industrial Commercial Urban River, Lake, Pond El Cuffs, Overlooks T —7 1 Designated Open Space 17 ❑ 1 Flat 7 u ! Hilly ❑ Mountainous 17 Other 0 NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: "/z mile ❑Yes El No *l miles ❑Yes ❑No *2 miles Oyes ❑No *3 miles ❑Yes ❑No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate.) EXPOSURE 6. 'The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work ❑ ❑ Involved in recreational activities ❑ Routine travel by residents C? At a residence 0 E Cl , ❑ At worksite El El, Other 0 i 2 1kOf n l �a 4 James Volney Righter "� � a r c h i t e c t s 11�J� O 'F 241 a i n c TOWN OF SO LJ3 19 October 1990 Board of Town Trustees Town Hall 53095 Main Rd . Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 Re: Kim K. Campbell , Fishers Island Attention: John M. Bredemeyer III We would like to amend our application dated 28 September 1990 for permission to build a garage for Kim K. Campbell on Fishers Island. The Campbells would like to add a swimming pool between the new garage and the existing main house . A site plan is enclosed showing the proposed location of the pool,,,,- When you visit the property to look at .the ""y p p y garage site, could you please also consider the pool . We would like to have the two projects considered separately, so that any possible dif- ficulties with one project won' t hold up the other . Thank you. Very truly yours, Jacob Albert Jacob D. Albert • James V. Righter , Brooke S. Trivas • Cynthia N. Wardell 58 Winter Street Boston • Massachusetts • 02108 • telephone • 617 • 451 • 5740 JAMES V. RIGHTER ARCH[ rTS LZUTEL OF URUSEDUTQ& 58 Winter Street BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02108 GATE t 470 JOB NO. (617) 451-5740 ATTENTION Tb 14;. To c, Ttrt tn,�L►-uSTa e S RE ° LC. Tvi6&n '5 75 c 1 S hxA­�, ", l3 e jc t t 79 sp E � 99 397 "s g3 � � d > WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ❑ Under separate cover via—L TMN OF R tems: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION Lt c a. Sri THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submitcopies for distribution > ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO !Vn -C+Y— k SIGNE � PROM z<uz I-,G.Mu 01471 It enclosures are not as noted, kindly noti us once. 3 # e any ! r Y k le� �` L t 9ah iu�I� h'N :C' u J y ✓ ! t A AyNY J Sl 3u } E �,. i i � � j_ i � .; ? � r � � � , _ � ; � r r � � 1 i � � � � � � � 1 . � , � _ � � :..�. u �--- -� �� �. 9 6 , , I s � � � _ - � _� I -� � . . . .. - _ __ _ .._.. _ # —�-� t � ; � , , ; � � - �. v �.W m . � O _. J � m Q � � :? w � `g , a � z z 3 �4R W .'Q .' �. 1t � * \ ;r.. '� �` F �t /_.. r .\ f J ' ' _ � , i i ! + � C �s � ' _ _ �-� �_ r . i- � � , I � + , I ' ; � ' ' � � a � i � a ' � � � i � � � N � I � �� j i � � � f � � ii � E1 ( f � Z � I i � I � i .,., n.. � � } � i j i } � � � ; t , , c � s � - i � # ' � � � I � ,— } � � h i � � � �.. � I I � �' i E � � � i i ? i �'; , � � c 1 i � i ( � I �_ R 7 �� i L.� �''> i �, ' `,S ' `/ 1 `I, G NIGH U>Alec. MA WE at to -� SOU • s Sleena•l C � If-� �` � \� ____� '�`�—-�� � yam_,_--�_-_,._---•�'"' , ,�. KEY MAP sealer I ' =400 ff. \ >•\\ a \\\ / a•e I fG � .. / BALCOM I � SPewe\per �$•" •aa•E - - ° \�STaue r'axaA +Nls \ \OC\ F N 64.40 o su 'e L CO e PRAC BENCH MARK TOP -OF MONUMENT 4PIW Elev. 9.29 (Bass NOW 1929) �qE �I>I' WR p•u aw _ \ \ � VOL y.• Jam,\ w� Cottage Parking Area Lp 15.9 ' \ 1 fence 0.9 0.e AVA CENTER LIFE I 1 .N� _ __-_ --- _ / / / / / •.• EASEMENT =4pP.-P+4E NOTES- UNDERGROUND 1 �>.• I (yD`T TELEPHONE 1. AREA • 4.34e Acres (appnx. bcalon I II - - / / / � v.• ! p I /Y.e / / / x.• o O a ;1 67 /I/ /,/ / ... 1 ra9� i ' O.• / K C � -w� Cc�w.phel� I / OCT I1990 1 I f. GLC U �- nJ p TOWN OF SOUTHOLD _ 1 I I Marsh SITE PLAN made for v3io u.> ROLLA B. CAN FISHERS ISLAND SCALE, I = 20 feet CHAP MAY 1811987 Ivvrwlcnit+vrE1. ao a so a 20 40 eo 4�VISCD 2<AUr.a� SCALE SH FEET JDDITI01.1S. IOFWLN e59 - M5DW PROPOSE° CAARA4F- ADTKA� BY JPrMES VOL E_'r R14wrA.- ARGIIYGLYS , IWL. 24 MAa. 90 - " • SSE e`\ — ,� OU A� \ RS _ . Of Bosch Club KEY MAP scale,1 400 ft. -�`r- / co osvew 44, \ �) / 6 �,a SPGNL�� jTd.1e TdMJCJ1 Oro" \ N •�;4•�O•E �j 1-, f , BALCOM asrew,e \ olsu \ Plue BENCH MARKate S TOP OF , ■ MONUMENT Elm9.29(BaN N9VD it 29) '� �.�e `��, m•u' \� . < o � ��� �� I \ 10 m9a vx%e vc u o 0 f D b • Imo . ( a Vp Cottage y(n 1 \Parking Area �O\ \ � \ ,... AN knoo P7 0.4 \ o., / _- i�- 11% CENTERLME I 1 - PR.oPasE-O - 1 � / ■., NOTESEASEM- UNDERGROUND 1 �>.� I ¢hRH4 -- >• : / �/ N+• . TELEPHONE I. AREA • 4.34A Acres -.,�4 (OPPre%. lacalan I I v.■ / // // '�, 'g• 1 - I ,,.4 I n.. l I Marsh SITE PLAN MCI for ROLLA B. CAMPBELL FISHERS ISLAND, NEW YORK SCALE: (" a 20 feet CHANDLER Pl4LMg! EKING MAY 18, 1987 orW , 0nn. 20 e s Eo ,o so 4RJVIS>eD ' 34►.tl4E, SCALE IN FEET —� - � A,V`GIT1Wi1 1�'IyAtFH 6�1 NEW PRoPa5E.0 gPAA4¢• ADPE4h By jAME1 vrA NEK R14H1 4R- hQU11TtLT5 , 11JL, Docko, Inc. P.O. Box 421, Mystic, CT 06355(860) 572-8939 Fax: (860) 572-7569, e-mail: docko@snet.net January 18, 2005 Mr. Albert Krupski, President Southold Board of Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Rolla Campbell Property Boat Lift Variance Dear Mr. Krupski: Last summer the Board of Trustees approved the removal of a floating dock and ramp and extension of the fixed pier including an "L" shaped end pier for Rolla and Kim Campbell's property in East Harbor on Fishers Island. Part of their original application was the installation of a boat lift as well. We would like to know if the Board of Trustees would be agreeable to reconsidering the boat lift since it was not approved as part of the dock modification application. We understand that the dock ordinance prohibits the installation of boat lifts. I feel however that there are mitigating circumstances in East Harbor that are beyond the considerations emphasized when the ordinance was adopted. The water in East Harbor is usually wavy and can be rough when there is a west or especially northwesterly, wind. The waves build with significant fetch in Fishers Island Sound and as the water depths become shallow in East Harbor, especially at low tide, the waves build toward the breaking point in the vicinity of the Campbell's dock. This is a tough environment to put a boat in the 20' to 35' range and during such conditions the vessel will stress and wear the tie-off lines significantly and even damage the cleats or guides on the vessel. This was the justification behind the boat lift installed at the Balcom's property next door in the 90's. We feel that this is an urgent consideration for the Campbell's for boating to be realistic and for the safety of the Campbell's and the equipment to be maximized. Conditions in the Sound can change quickly; smooth water at departure does not guarantee smooth water upon returning. It would be greatly appreciated if you would reconsider this; we would be agreeable to making a presentation or visiting with you at the site at your convenience to observe these particular conditions. Again, we feel that the prohibition against boat lifts is a viable consideration in small creeks and protected areas, but this is not one of those areas. If you could let me know the consensus of the Board, we will pursue this further as appropriate. D � C E Q L°/ E tfully submitted, O, INC. JA N 1 y 2005 eit B. Neilson, P.E. SOI!Uod Town Rc3rd of Trustees KBN:jm CC: Dr. & Mrs. Rolla Campbell 01Q File: 03-03-1409 CAMPBELL