Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBURNHAM, DAVID Consultant DAVID BURNHAM Project Name DAVID BURITHAM SCTM #1000- 10-3-4_1 Date 2115/93 The Southold Town Trustee office has determined that your application for a coastal erosion/wetland permit is non-jurisdictional/incomplete, please consider the following information in this regard for any required return submission: Unfortunatelythis office has not had a chance to follow up in writing to you on �rour 12ermit requests for 1992 1 ) Vnnr an�nlirration for a Wetland Permit GrandfathPr Permit for the dnrk is incomplete in, that it does not show the dimension of,width on the drawing you submitted. Once you submit us a more detailed drawing which may atxtomatical=ice be included in vour Coastal Erosion appli- cation packet as a survey, we will be in a position to consider your rPcllest. 21 The repairs & construction of a revetment require an applicatio€ ,for a Coastal Erosion Permit (Chapter 37) . You should submit same shortly ac wP are rnrrently waiving fees for storm damaggunder this program. F.nrlosed please find an application form for use'in- this Town Code Chapter 37 Permit Your application must include a licensed survey of the strrlrture(s) and an executed 30 3Zear-maintenance agreement which shall serve to reduce such paper work in the future. 3) Failure to actively seek these permits in 1993 Could result in an in- vPst_ig@tinn as to whether violations of either Chaster 97 (Wetlands) or 37 (coastal erosion) of the Town code exist on yourproperty for work done withoutgpermit. � L rustee Representative cc: �1=zT-1`SP.3i'dCJ—"t�OTI'CF—=— This notice makes no claim with respect to other jurisdictions within or outside the Town of Southold with respect to permits, permission required. 4/92 Southold Town Trustees Field Inspection Report Project Applicant/Number Dd d 61a r'I Xavvn /0-3 q Site contains the following important natural features_(Beach, Bluff, Dune, Secondary Dune, Escarpment; Kettle holes, Erratics or Significant Habitats, Rare, Threatened, Endangered or species of special concern. �d-aii�it9 T"�Y9 C3T� ( ai Extent proposed activities are at variance from established standards of Coastal Erosion Projection; is supplemental engineering or advis g c inion indicated? Refer to CAC? Can impacts be moderated by simple project change? Should FEMA Regs. be checked Prior to' Permitting? application complete, assement form provided/complete ublic services landward of Structure. IPW Non-movable structures/additions prohibited. 1J.,q Permanent foundations not attached to movable structures p-,q No movable structure within 25' of landward limit of Bluff. IIA No movable structure placed so excessive ground loading placed within 50 ' of point of inflection. elocation agreement required/acceptable. "" Surface water not directed to/over bluff face. The Activity is: `'Reasonable and necessary, considering reasonable alternatives to the proposed activity and the extent to which the proposed activity requires a shoreline location. Not likely to cause a measurable increase in erosion at ,.the proposed site and at other locations. Prevents or minimizes effects on natural protective features and their functions and protective values existing erosion protection structures and natural resources. ,. ens REMARKS: L.0c —1 f�'° 'r/ ��f 2. y,✓ r� T a Trustee signature) Date inspected: ��` �� 4 „o' �Aof TRUSTEES �3f. SCOTT L. HARRIS John M. Bredemeyer, III, President "� Y ,� : Supervisor Henry P. Smith, Vice President _ Albert J. Krupski, Jr. - ' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road John L. Bednoski, Jr. P.O. Box 1179 John B. Tuthill Southold, New York 11971 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD P Telephone (516) 765-1800 5 L U L5 �� GRANDFATHER APPLICATION € r II 992 1. Name of Applicant: 2. Mailing address: `BC>X 3� r15ii�2s SiA � YOLi�' 06 C Tel. No:(Jvah�s- -�6-5�Z' 3 . Address of Property: �C�yS J�,�c �c3fk GISgj>SkT `� 4. Tax Map Number: 1000- Approx.yr.of construct: 1�, 6 5 . Prior owner if known:-!�/A 6 . Diagram of existing structures, including all dimensions, must be included with this application: 7 . Indicate on attached map: Location, ie; reference point, telephone pole number, adjacent property owners, etc. Signature of applicant: �c i` `�i7i't— --mate: p, * Please note, there is a one time fee of $50.00 for filing this application. Albert J. Krupski,President Town Hall Jahn Holzapfel,Vice President 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson y x P.O. Box 1179 Martin H. Garrell O Southold, New York 11971 Peter Wenczel yzlJ�l �.a0� Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only Coastal Erosion Permit Application Wetland Permit Application Grandfather Permit Application Trustee Lands Permit Application Waiver Received Application: Clerical Review: Completed Application Incomplete SEQRA Classification: e I Type II Unlisted Coordination: (date sent) CAC Referral Sent: Date of Inspection: j Receipt of CAC Report: (date) Lead Agency Determination: Technical Review: (date) Public Hearing: (date) j Decision: Approved (Y/N) (date) Application Fee:$ Name of Applica nt �j(7 { � VKr.� VYrip�-ItS Address /sQ i'tYL(. Grr' (*�, ��JY '� 1c4IFPOLSt-�I"yf� QZ7�`I Phone Number: (Sa8 ) -758' - ,320(o Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - Et? Olo gLOCV 3 - Lrrrt ) 2j$1 Property Location:?LtjNSu1,A KID �G.SF(EM I.SLbun 7 rnmgor 0 1 &),) 6ox-v (provide LILCO Pole #, dist7465e)aAAS e to cross streets, and location) Agent- �� �(tl�� �A"j (If applicable) �/ Address: � ka w:y' ST. �jZZ ��N �o� (�� QA aZ�$� Phone: 5n8 9R3-(Q5�7 Board of Trustees Application c GENERAL DATA Land Area (in square feet) : 4piaoo t Area Zoning: t O�7T7 A l Previous use of property: t )NppV6Lye" Intended use of property: 'SWCyLe ''eta( ��ii✓SGE J(E Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary) : CQJ3FY-VrTi&A) ezr- A, 9CC,� gVbMyvt -,QT fio sTA8tLtzC- r?i?octo,J ANo A. lZoof s; �tNG,L,F-�MIV� �.EStY�u-1JCE . 2 Board of Trustees Application a County of Suffolk State of New York � IkYL( S YMV Il 000 -N (S BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS 'CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S) , IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S) , TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. Signature SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS c2 2 _DAY OF Notary Public 3 Board of Trustees Application P AUTHORIZATION (where �t/he, applicant is not the rlowner) T I. ` ALII� Z t.YJYLI JN M Vi1 e1 V(7l? d C residing at po, &k M) kM1 fst, 1 / (print owner of prop ty) (mailing address) P !I'a- CZ_7 �1 do hereby authorize ? f C_ (Agent) V&J Voo(LOIS to apply for permit( s) from the Southold Board of Town Trustees an my behalf. (Owner' s signature) 4 a Board of Trustees Application COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity: e) pAgVexrr Fd27ge-e p_yeoSMA) t),- ZYZ C 01- Are wetlands present within 75 feet of the proposed activity? V No Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? No Yes If Yes, how much material will be excavated? (cubic yards) How much material will be filled? $bn S6r PoAl'i (ccalubic/ yards) Manner in which material will be removed or depositedlj 3� BALL, 406r . Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed. (Use attachments if necessary) 97trwict— BE Am Pn/✓l,G Iylw&2y7;oC. lmbgJir gorat,77yA Ti2om �YtS P�a�f�GT_ 14.16-4(2167)—Text 12 PROJECT LD. NUMBER 617.21 SEQ Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I—PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor) 1. APrNT/SPONSOR , > ( 2. PROJECT NAME I 3. PROJECT LOCATION: IV/ V Municipality 1. County ")f%j d. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc„ or provide map) 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: New ❑Expansion Cl Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: j11 P�oSt _ in,c ( voc� f ecN� r�t�rtor � 0f= A �trs�tE rr}}f�!1L t itCUSC S l7EOir�MEt�c� vETtn T i 7-0 C0"/—j t L_ 0q'0S10rJr 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially . S T acres Ultimately — acres 3. YJILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? Yes u No It No,describe briefly 9. WHAT 1 ESENT LAND USE iN VICINITY OF PROJECT? E ^ Residential Droitistrial r Commercial U Agriculture ❑Park/Forest/Open space L!Other Describe: 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY(FEDERAL, STATE O OAU? Yes ❑No if yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals - r✓JJ //P 6� 11. DOES ANY ASPEC,OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ❑Yes ENo if yes.list agency name and permit/approval - 12. AS A RESULT OF P' POSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REOUIRE MOOIFCATION? ❑Yes N8 I CERTIFY THAT T iNFOORRMATION PROVIDED ABOVE, IS TIRUUEE/TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicantisponsor name. `� - �"" VS Date: Signature: If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 - 617.21 SEC: Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a projec or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert inenvironmenta. analysis. in addition, many who have knowledge.in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affectin-, the question of significance:- The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determinatior process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: , Part 1: Provides'objective data and information about a given project and its site. 3y identifying basic projec: data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. ?art '_: --ocuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides . guidance as to whether an impact is like'y to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact: The form.also identifies whether an impact can ' e mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. - DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of. EAF completed for this project: - 0 Part 1 ❑ Part '_ ❑Part 3 j Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting j information, and considering both the magitude-.and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: C A. The project will not result in any large and important impac (s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title or Responsible Officer (� Signature of Responsible Officerin Lead Agency Signature ofPreparer(If different from responsibleofficer) Date 7 PART 1—PROJcOT INRORMA710N Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant er on the environment. Please complete the entife form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be'cvnsid as part of the application for approval and maybe subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additl information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not inv new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and spe each instance. NAME OF ACTION ' 6W,6 AV,'J COA177ZC LOCATION CF ACTION(tnclutle�APPLICAN Stree cplL Cy L JU ue-B USINESS TELEPHONETVCO 773-6r.r&12 AO RESS CITYIP _ - STATE I ZIP CODE Mfg- I ®L9 a NAM F OWNER"(if di ter nt) '/ BUSINESS T=EPHONE e17Ls I ( ) ? ' 3 2O� AC O ESS C:TY1P9 STATE i zip CODE VZ73 CESC'n IPTION OF ACTION /Yr PAVJ6rr /•iLc v!!e� 77/F ' DVA2.S7'4Uo7_1CAJ of A SAJ11CS A-1M/C,Y )vX*y&T/ II A PRLIMETV7L. I-DG� W<jCL4 7-0 T E7LOS[� Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if.not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Comme.-cial [►}'Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-fa ❑Forest ClAgricuiture 00ther 2. Total acreage of project area: ,L_� acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24. 25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicate type) - acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? " a. Soil drainage: Nell drained ce % of site ❑Moderately well drained of site ❑Poorly drained a/ of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the N' Land Classification System? acres" (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes LFNo a. v:hat is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 .. •g.•Approximate percentage of proposed Project site with dopes: 13-- ".� C 10-13,.� . Ct1�5% or greater °o 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or con m.a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the Nations Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes C:M v � '. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Oyes QN 8, What Ss the depth of the water table? (in feet) � / 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Oyes avo .. 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑Yes. VNo 11. Does project site contain any species or plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered Oyes CNKo According to Identify each species 12. Are there any uniqu/ee or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations LCYes L o Describe 13. Is the projac sit_ presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area-. []Yes Cwlo If yes, explain- 14. Does the present—sijtj include scenic views known to be important to the community? OYes LNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to Project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? G??es CNo Ca) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? NYe's ❑No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? GYes W0 18. Is the site located it an agricultural strict certified pursuant to Agriculture and ,markets Law, Article 25:AA, Section 303 and 304? Dyes t 0 19. Is the site located in or substantially c3�ntiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Yes CNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Dyes Lf No B. Project Description.. , 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) T° p[A✓ S a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled b 55 2 ��Y A7A�Eo g g Y project sponsor acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: acres initially; acres ultimately. C. Project acreage to remain undeveloped acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed %;. f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately is Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure Z' height; S_width: �'y length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ( 8 ft. 3 low much natural ma.teria+. (i.e.,,rock, earti, etc.) wiN be remoov�vec'. from the rte� trJDNr/ tcnsicubi;: Yarc 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ❑Yes CNo C24,, a. If yes, for what intendut: ourpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? gles CNo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? 2�es . CNe _ 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? CYes 2N0 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 mkf f month la _ year. (including demolition c. Approximate completion date of final phase eP77 month _ year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? CYes 2�No 8. Will blas.ing occur during construction? " CYes 13KO - 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project _/ 11. Will project require_relocation of any projects or facilities?� ❑Yes f<C If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid.waste disposal involved? ❑YesL+1Vo _ a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged/ 13. .Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? , []YestlsNo Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes C,, o. Explain 15, Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? es C N o 16. Will the project generate solid waste? Dyes Colo a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑Yes CNo c. If yes,.give name location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes ONO e. If Yes,. explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? CYes 2N0 a. if yes, what is the anticipatecr-rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes ell' oo 19.. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? CYes L-?db 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient r'oise levels? CYes 3iiQo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ❑Yes No If yes , indicate type(s). 22. If water supply is from weirs, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. 24. Does project invc!v.3 Local, State or Federal funding? CYes No if Yes, explain 4 Apprnv.tls Rcquin•d: Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board Oyes ' fq's - City, Town, Village Planning Board ❑Yes ONo -City, Town Zoning Board Oyes 2<'o City, County Health Department ❑Yes CdN�o Other Local Agencies Oyes ON Other Regional Agencies ❑yes C1/No State Agencies Oyes E_ o -Federal Agencies Oyes QNo C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning-or zoning decision? Yes ONO If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance. . ❑special use permit ❑subdivision`'_ ❑site plan ❑newirevision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning class ification(s)of the site? ,egjIOE�,-✓77A - 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 1 s —. r �!ocE .4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? A') 5, What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? _ SAMY_ hhayc— _ C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ❑ems 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a Y mile radius of proposed action? YC-JLV s7J 77 A-(— -8. is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a "A mile? es ON r- 9. If (lie proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of"sewer or water districts? ❑Yes 11 . Will the proposed action create a'�demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, polio fire protection)? Oyes a o a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? es ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly abo t ve present levels? 01'es 97< a. If yes; is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ONO D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please din uss such impacts and the nioasures which you propose to mitigate o avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the inforr , lion prov dad tbos,• , trill• to the best of my t'nowledge. Applic:anL'S umor N [7ln Qv Date 9� Signature - Title If the .,cline is in the Coastal Area, aad you .ire a .Tale agency, cnutplelc the Coastal Assessment rorm bciore proceeding with this assessment. 5 Part 2—PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist th reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, th s requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illu Trative and have been offered as guidance.They do not cc titute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer ach question. • The number of examples per question does n t indicate the importance of each question, • In identifying impacts, consider long term, shor term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Ans rYes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answe . c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appro iate box (column 1 or 2) to indi to the potential size of the impact, If impact threshold equals or exceeds any examp provided,check column 2. 1 impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then.consi r the impact as pot tially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mi 'gated by chang ) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No respons indicates t t such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By IMPACT ON LAND Impact Impact Project Change 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the oject e? O YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (1 act rise per 100 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No foot of length), or where the general slopes in t project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to e water table is less than ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 3 feet. \\ • Construction of paved parking area f r 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ \ ❑ El Yes [I No • Construction on land where bedroc is exposed or generally within ❑ \\. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ \ ElYes ❑No than one phase or stage_ \ • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ © ❑Yes ❑No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ' ❑No 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.). NO ❑YES • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No 6 y : 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15,24, 25 of the Environmental Consery n Law, ECL) at' NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a d ❑ ❑Yes ❑No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing,6r new body of water? IJNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater 'r/ quality or quantity? VINO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ 0Yes ❑No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or pattern , or surface water runoff? NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No 7 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be ' Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change a • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? VNO DYES r Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ' ❑ ❑ []Yes ONO hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ []Yes []No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ Cl ❑Yes ONO heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ENO to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial g ❑ ❑ []Yes ONO development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endang�ed species? ETNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. . • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes []No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threaten or non-endangered species? iNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 _ • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ []Yes [--]No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important _ vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCE 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land reso ces? ❑ O OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc. 8 e 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ Dyes El No agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) •- Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? NO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of Kistoric, pre- historic or paleontological importance? O DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ Eyes ' ❑No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATIO 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality o existing or future open spaces or recreational.opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 NO DYES • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 9 1 2 3 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation syste s? Moderate Large Mitigated By NO DYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sourc s of fuel or energy supply? NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ { El Yes ❑No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family {{I residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibrat)ON as a result of the Proposed Action? O DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety ©NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No substances(i.e.oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of"hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ El Yes ONO within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No 10 o _I =1 T Z mj37J0 ay rt O o o 3 m m m o v m m D "' 0- O N X _ . ! X < W c rr-CD ' r t y$ s � v O (-Do Z N G) p 1 O T m O 91 < Dco m < Z ;a. m m 7. —I Z Z _ (Jl D v 2 S O m m Z z Tl m O m w V z CD LIN M Jq i O � m C M ��'„ r G � r ° 4 N /�I S� e 0 T i n E d lent of �JT LEGEND ugh a grant al Oceanic /VoS,?ta e Management COASTAL EROSION HAZARD ARE/ Landward Limit of Naturc- - Landward Limit of Structc \ 33 WT AW \q 17 k2 b` s > 1, A a a r ' ��nz r,� �¥?•�hj � ��..tom .";. J`2 �h r3^4 SA v6•'a S sw ✓;.b � mo, �`� ��`� S� prSXd S d s�a� m�"" Z b F"<: "�r�`'m�taa�:\:iiv •a ,4,w C -aa �xmS\ '�c. ,', bzw� 5 � °.'�w aM,"v. .S. ,',:n� �i`x >w ey ...� 'G iAaJ> )• 0 a - ? x b A h `Yi. £ `yS C£✓ a � -M �i & v aM Z°�i 1,10 •YAV ly ice^ 'arc : S Yam+ �a � @ Y 'Y' Yi. �ft�`QA i 2 t • • � MCR @ '4 d.dt @ t b k�a'y i 3 � � 'a � .iaz` z A YS sX^i,N atti•i`.l A `'Y.,St x xi Vim• z s.£xw s ea tis �*�'' F4^m ram+ % mt'��•' .a.: "y_ �.`� g`,'�`'�i a� a•s�cY�az�.a` ���� a e��� y�a �n �� '.'F• .�Nc ' a F e`gym ����•-, .✓e.-�, ���.^�� � �� �'y a ��w 2 s"_ ` �?�.a,��" °"r�" .�,v.rx� � w s'� v,�x Y�aa' ��e n yea. �• -'$ca �� =s m^ r I jes March M2 1 ohn �V MAR 1 6 i1j)002 �Lij L& Min pano, Sju ?"Gicip 119711 WN OF SOUTHOLD Fpm * 1:0-745—Swei ;EM0 j -- 0,oyj ; to wit no,pe n ; y <U-j" the Just ' POS;rd ln " I "g thl? Psym a too WAIT in 4,10 bout on Fosse" Wand fp6w Ke "on InSW4 In On, pia-bor - 7ax AW TYV boost is W 4011 Stc-a VaSuMd in at Nvrnic-n4 PCs 'Vj the a WJI th-MIA the ;wters W, kunt 04 zroizion too Wn" that surrounew thl "I" oz We Wood th ' s 4 Pei 4pta 00 : 09 ogre Via lownH aid! Sisip 0!l ; and Zw th ttic Solut: 0- to W : 6, ; pme boulde-1 .wry ,, f j ,pgg Q - 4 f0 up V a inscond -to W Own Mr hwldbr,�. _ - . - With 0� amekmp) 1001orm Sivy ? 1 0 anainst the exietirg S! Qpn , AQU,: *e 304 00 thwi View VQW 40, bormee 0 All resks Pro ; www1i pi; :00m Van w! SSwh*r2 co Ke bVIVA WS& I Olt moved or os& ir WS no mchm tl / an too bell c0millim"t 'he mijpa! syr-purOPQ 7hill 001 ,010 WINUP ZhT pon0*00 -ad waph-r 7%,pv you in aduincO TOP you- 7471 4F,- T nn ,nd a rd T".Y I<T.I' f XXX5--'.:Y•kti\M(XM«`{X3IXkt; CONSU 'R �.-� W Indnidu,l or Corponi;o� R LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT—THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED BY LAWYERS ONLY. ie:.79312,�16'432 THIS INDENTURE, made the 25th day of December , nineteen hundred and eighty two .. ..... .. .. .. BETWEEN ANNE ROBINSON BURNHAM OWEN, RUFUS BRADFORD BURNHAM III, SARAH BURNHAM MALINOWSKI, DAVID CAMPBELL BURNHAM and FEB 3 1383 RACHEL BEVAN BURNHAM, 15 Prospect Street, Hudson, Ohio, 44236, �35 COUrLly party of the first part, and SCRIBNER L. FAUVER, TRUSTEE under Trust Agreement dated 1-2-83 between Anne Robinson Burnham Owen, Rufus Bradford Burnham III, Sarah Burnham Malinowski, David Campbell Burnham and Rachel Bevan Burnham, as Donors, and Scribner L. Fauver, as Trustee, t { 15 Prospect Street, Hudson, Ohio, 44236, party of the second part, WITNESSEI`H, that the party of the first part, in consideration of----Ten and no/100----------------- im -------------------------------`--------------------------------------dollars, m x u lawful money of the United States, paid remise, release and quit-claim 10 by the party of the second part, does hereby unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being in theolSTRICT SECTION 13LOCK LOT f CJ L7 OI _) PARCEL NO. 1 (� �12 ,a I i f J 1 <] ._� G l� A certain tract or parcel of land situate, lying C) (DC-),J s Island, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, Stare of ---.,ded a\\x,:� and described as follows: Beginning at a point, marked with an iron, on the Westerly line of the 1' A twenty foot right of way shown on the Plan hereinafter mentioned, leading Northerly from the highway leading to the Peninsula, sometimes called Peninsula Road, said beginning point being on the dividing line between the herein conveyed KrIAP tract and Lot ll 32, as shown on said Plan; thence running Southerly, along the :NATION Westerly line of said twenty foot right of way, one hundred thirty feet to a point marked by another iron, said point being the Northeasterly corner of Lot 4i 1,000 35 as shown on said Plan; thence Westerly, along the Northerly line of said Lot # )IC o d„ 35, as shown on said Plan, on a line forming an interior angle of seventy-seven degrees sixteen minutes, one hundred sixty-four feet, more or less, to the shore ,3 o 0 of Great Harbor; thence following the meanders of said shore, in a general Northwesterly, Northerly and Northeasterly direction one hundred thirty-five GO. CO feet, more or less, to a point, being the Southwesterly corner of Lot # 32 as shown on said Plan; thence Easterly, along the Southerly line of said Lot # 32, as shown on said Plan, on a line at right angles to said Westerly line of said twenty foot right of way, one hundred eleven feet, more or less, to the Westerly line of said twenty foot right of way, at the point of .beginning; containing thirty-eight hundredths of an acre, more or less. Being Lots 33 and 34 as shown on a certain map entitled "Plan of Peninsula at Fishers Island owned by Charles W. Hedge & Frances G. Thorp, by Chandler & Palmer, Engrs. Norwich, Conn, dated 1913" , and filed in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Suffolk on March 11, 1913, File No. 223. Together with allthe right, title and interest, if any, of the party of •\ the first part in and to the shores and land tinder the waters of Great Harbor in , \) front of and adjoining said premises. � — a Clerk of .1•xn•Innl F.l' It'Rr L.nub.....'1 �1 �U%t ­%4xX xt;!^'Lk1x.NZNCXll,%Ji}C.V'.1Exp"7oPC.W104-I ndrc idud of cotpouitm CONSU i'O'UR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT—THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED RY LAWYERS ONLY. t ,e_-9312��c�432 i14M INDENTURE, made the 25th day of December , nineteen hundred and eighty two BETVVE.EN ANNE ROBINSON BURNHAM OWEN, RUFUS BRADFORD BURNHAM III, SARAH BURNHAM MALINOWSKI, DAVID CAMPBELL BURNHAM and FEB 9 1383 RACHEL BEVAN BURNHAM, 15 Prospect Street, Hudson, Ohio, 44236, fit'" F, I;A IN',SUr.. K 183t_ 1 COUhih_� } party of the first part,.and SCRIBNER L. FAUVER, TRUSTEE. under .Trust Agreement i dated 1-2-83 between Anne Robinson Burnham Owen, Rufus } Bradford Burnham III, Sarah Burnham Malinowski, David , Campbell Burnham and Rachel Bevan Burnham, as Donors, ' and Scribner L. Fauver, as Trustee, 15 Prospect Street, Hudson, Ohio, 44236, party of the second part, WTT'NESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of-----Ten and no/100----------------- im =------------------------------------------------------------------------dollars, ru k lawful money of the United States, paid remise, release and quit claim by the party of the second part, does hereby )irRtttxlnxsloi2unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being in theDISTRICT SECTION BLOCK LOT PARCEL NO. 1 C� n Q 1 �_I,fj, t_ LO fI [9 tom. . . ._ _ A certain tract or parcel of land situate, lying 0C� � (Do G s Island, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, Stare ui n. .t, , ,,. -ded and described as follows: Beginning at a point, marked with an iron, on the Westerly line of the x to ljj twenty foot right of way shown on the Plan hereinafter mentioned, leading Northerly from the highway leading to the Peninsula, sometimes called Peninsula Road, said beginning point being on the dividing line between the herein conveyed KMAP tract and Lot 032, as shown on said Plan; thence running Southerly, along the VATION Westerly line of said twenty foot right of. way, one hundred thirty feet to a 1,000 point marked by another iron, said point being the Northeasterly corner of Lot /t 35 as shown on said Plan; thence Westerly, along the Northerly line of said Lot # 35, as shown on said Plan, on a line forming an interior angle of seventy-seven degrees sixteen minutes, one hundred sixty-four feet, more or less, to the shore �30 of Great Harbor; thence following the meanders of said shore, in a general Northwesterly, Northerly and Northeasterly direction one hundred thirty-five Go3Go feet, more or less, to a point, being the Southwesterly corner of Lot 11 32 as �0 AX�6 shown on said Plan; thence Easterly, along the Southerly line of said Lot ll 32, as shown on said Plan, on a line at right angles to said Westerly line of said .twenty foot right of way, one hundred eleven feet, more or less, to the Westerly line of said twenty foot right of way, at the point of .beginning; containing thirty-eight hundredths of an acre, more or less. Being Lots 33 and 34 as shown on a certain map entitled "Plan of Peninsula at Fishers Island owned by Charles W. hedge & Frances G. Thorp, by Chandler & Palmer, Engrs. Norwich, Conn. dated 1913" , and filed in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Suffolk on March 11, 1913, File No. 223. Together with all the right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to the shores and land under the waters of Great Harbor in \j front of and adjoining said premises. o ry tt n ARTHMR I, ..,. `3 i' C I_1 erk b( Cl cry1r; (•,('( '1g 4 z `.a s-- ao 9 rdor- T � A V L •• 3 � � e s 7 N 0 a ��" At•�Roxl � \ �--�� tMr:�,;Nq HIG P.fEIZ /- pxlsnN�l 1 F{Az?J2D LI.I� 1 '2E510ENGE \ I �q�EQ �,�I-Eg2E 1...1NE PI a. 3 i72XW s RES�12vE W/SToN13S • � - 4iO�H022-TT H SITE PI_A.N �/20- I O �IMENSIOh1S f��TAkE1� ROM ��F��-^P05�.0 �p516h1 col...Mom'--PptPP:�L�D $Y �ACGV-F�1.� �/Isd�l�✓�Y�H 15 yyYSvI�YI, r 4'`I r t r q , � l ' Ail, .•// rl1 r41r i xl e �� AI I ' �1 �t 1 ,q tvl� ,�� ' pgFb '. J1 ^ f e ✓ .' ' I ary J7{d�� ��� r .ra II r Iry Y i d l s 5 L✓♦ :- � y � i t�b1; F _� , , MNAIt / L I ON MAP 2aE" ;; o eao ti 0 - - } \ / veu5 'APH1, SCALE IN ET �P la �NE:HMAIz;IC_� 1 � CH e1 �` TAP f� �P'I K E � lo,: � � I ' • Irr ✓NN . - APPFLRIMATE J I - ' OP''1 KITH 'ISSIF-✓ ��� `1 l�` } / f Delvelpq \ POD" 1 �' II II � �I R i� i�ENG MAF MT Uo c- PLAN OF PENINSULA AT P15HER5 15LAND F- o ,u Sir=Four D`�-r'rc�c 5�-no� al o OWNED BY GHARLES W. HEDGE E PRANGE5 G. THORP l000 VO.d BvrGK- 3L.crS I, z d-:I rD Scale 50 Peet to the Inch By Chandler A Palmer Engrs. Norwich, Gonn. Ig15. Revised OGt.1451, July Ig55, Sept.lab i, Lot Areas Added Jan. 2d, Icl-f(. 1'RQFOBED EROSION rrr4 'MOL MIAIP FILL WITH Lc m A, Sea� 4 T'11YFi f'Tti Pon 16 1 HUH ICI s�a� FILL WITH IZ 12 i —14 Pftr P .m I 1 eCGK. C/11PSI D2eP Woe-1MVM AA V T to _- FILL WITH LaaM ;A ■ ID 5URNHAM, E 1 - AL• 2 FILL(yJITH S�-P1`i AIJO SEED l SLnP6 FILL l.2-E.�-IilrTH C.K.�A11P�` � ;..� r " 1 9 FILTER F<BR�G IM�"Y ITOI PE 2L4 roNAenuLOEe- CW Geus(7 a B 2-¢ Tou f✓`OIILOEC.S CI-10 C�cu*� zo Io o go AT THE 1°ENNIN5ULA W0 1 / �'' / EKISTIv.+� G¢1.GE W G E,<ISTI.ib Ge�.oF lU \ EKIsrwG Ge.�.oE GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET F451iER5 ISLAND, NMV`I YORIG REVISIONS CHAh1i1LER. PALMER �. KYIVG _ z -1 DATE DESCRIPTION - �o �IsrwcZ!n FEET 4o UG lr4mArchitects,mEngineers and SwH eyors tee O 2/a Apt. 'Yu A:riar(.'u5 Foe k.ln2 ToC 1101MMD11AY taiVICIL GTOL310203MY!'17�11'y% 00}NF)�01 10 Z DISTANCE IH FEET I.Y7tlE ,F�Y✓-r�eJU DISTMIGE IN FEET � �JECI' ION ' P- � SEGTIQLI G —C ; SEC-7IOU p'=10' Fbrz „=10 No= I P'=lo Hoez I"-4' vae-T. ,.-4 vEer. DATEI MAY 11993 r-4 v6CT. SCALEI' =aW '• SHEET 1' OF 1 '' 'f'