Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-3841Board Of $outhold Town Trustees SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK RE-ISSUE.D: Aug~s~ PERMIT NO...3.~! .............. DATE....~T. une ZZ,......~ ISSUED TO ....... ]~}....~....~p..o..~.~....~....~4~!~ ............................................. ulhor zatio Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 615 of the Laws of the State of New York, 1893; and Chapter 404 of the Laws of the State of New York 1952; and the Southold Town Ordinance en- tiffed "REGULATING AND THE PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS IN AND .ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and the REMOVAL OF SAND, GRAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;" and in accordance with the Resolution of The Board adopted at a meeting held on 9... ~ , and in consideration of the sum of $ paid by of .................................................................................... N. Y. and subject to the Terms and Conditions listed on the reverse side hereof, of Southold Town Trustees authorizes and permits the following: Reconstruct Historic Lighthouse that was built 1870 & distroyed in 1963. There shall be no sanitary facilities nor any use. This is strictly a historic & signaling structure. all in accordance with the detailed speclflcafion~ as presented in the originating application. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees h~ere- by causes, ifs Corporate. S.e. al to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a malonty of th, sa~d Board as of-this dat.e. TERMS end CONDITIONS The Permittee Merlon ~gi~gin c/o East End Seaport & Marine residing at One Bootleg Alley. Greenport N. Y~ as parr of the coasideratioa for the issuance of the Permit does undersmmt and pzescribe to the fol- lowing: 1. That the said Board bi; Trustees and the Town of South. old are released from any and all damages, or cia;me for damage, Of snir. s aliSillg directly or hl~y as a result of a~ oper- ation performed pursuant to this permit, and the said Pemai~ will, at his o~ bar own defend any and all such suits initiated by ~ parties, and the said Permitt~ assumes full liability with respect thereto, co the complete exclusion of the Board of Trustees of the Town of ,~m, thold 2. That this Permit is valid for a period of 12 mos. which is comid~'d to be the estimated time required to complete the work involved~ but should circumstances wasrant, l:eClUest for an extension may be made to the Board at a later date. 3. That this Permit should be retained indefinitely, or as long as the said Permittee wishe$ to maintain the strum or project involved, to provide evidance to anyone concerned that auth- orization was originally obtained. 4. That .the work involved will be subject to the inspection ami approval of the Board or its agents, and non-compliance with the provisions of the origin~allng appllcetion, may be cause for revocation of this Permit by resolution of the said Board. 5. That there will be no unreasonable interference with navigation as a result of the work herein authorized. 6. That there shall be no interference with the right of the public to pass and repa~ along the beach between high and low water marks. 7. That ff future opexarions of the Town of $outhold require the removal and/or alterafioas in the location of the work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Board of Tmste~, work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to free navigatin~ the said laermlttee will be l~lul upon due notice, to remove or alter this work or project herein stated without expenses, to the Town of Southoid. 8. That the said Board will be notified by the Permittee or the completion of the work anth- otized. 9. That the Permittea will obtain all other p~rmlts and comems;that may be required sup- plemantal to this permit which may be subject to revoke upon failum to obtain same. TRUSTEES SUPERVISOR John M. Bredemeyer~ III. President SCOTT L. HARRIS Albert g. Krupsld. Jr.. Vice President Henry P. Smith Town Hall John B. Tuthill 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson EO. Box 1179 Telephone (516~ 765-1892 Southold_ New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CERTIFIED August 13, 1993 Merlon Wiggin Peconic Associates One Bootleg Alley P.O. Box 672 Greenport, NY 11944 RE: East End Sea Port and Marine Foundation - "Bug Light" Permit ~ 3841 Dear Mr. Wiggin: Enclosed herewith is permit ~3841 reissued to accurately reflect condition's regarding "Bug Light", as per the public hearing held on June 21, 1990. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Ve~ t~ruly y~]~S,~ ~ohn M. Bredemeyer, III ~,~ President, Board of Trustees JMB:jmd cc: Bldg. D~pt. Bay Constable TRUSTEES SCOTT L. HARRIS John M. Bredemeyer, III. Presidem Supervisor Henry P. Smith, Vice President Albert J. Krupski. Jr. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 John L. Bednoski, Jr. Southold, New York 11971 John B. Tuthill BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 June 25, 1990 Merlon Wiggin Peconic Associates One Bootleg Alley P.O. Box 672 Greenport, NY 11944 Re: App. No. 4-2-90-132 Dear Mr. Wiggin: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during its regular meeting held on June 21, 1990 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, MERLON WIGGIN IN BE~IALF OF T~E EAST END SEAPORT AND MARINE HISTORICAL FOUNDATION applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated April 10.. 1990 and~ WHEREAS said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on June 21, 1990 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and ~re familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT MERLON WIGGIN IN BEI{ALF OF EAST END SEAPORT & MARINE HISTORICAL FOUNDATION BE AN~ ~EREBY IS GRAR'£'~D PERMISSION UNDER THE WETLAlqD ORDINANCE TO: Reconstruct the historic lighthouse constructedin 1870 and destroyed in 1963. This permit will expire two years from the date it is signed if work has not commenced by said date. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Two inspections are required and the Trustees are to be notified upon completion of said project. Please return to the Building Department for a determination on the need for any other permits which may be required for this project. Permit will be issued upon payment of the following fees for work to be done below Mea/% High Water Mark: None Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB:jb cc: Bldg. Dept. Conservation Advisory Council file TRUSTEES SCOTT L. HARRIS John M. Bredemeyer, III. President Supervisor Henry P. Smith. Vice President Town Halt. 53095 Main Road Albert J. Krupski, Jr. P.O. Box 1179 John L. Bednoski. Jr. Southold, New York 11971 John B. Tuthill BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Fax (5161 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE OF NO SIGNIFICANT Eh'~'ECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT APPLICATION NO. 4-2-90-132 NAME: East End Seaport & Marine Historical Foundation DATE: May 29, 1990 RESOLVED that pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Trustees, as Lead Agency for the action described below, has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. TYPE OF ACTION: Unlisted Action DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Reconstruct historic lighthouse constructed in 1870 and destroyed in 1963. LOCATION: Rock foundation 650 yards SW of Long Beach Point. Lat N 41 degrees 06' 31" Long W 72 degrees 18' 25", Orient. Tax map No. Section 132 REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: 1. An on site inspection has been conducted by the Board of Trustees. 2. An environmental assessment, submitted by the applicant and reviewed and completed by the Board of Trustees, has indicated that no significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. 3. Because there has been a response from the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council approving with the suggestion of Using a modern type of Sanitary system, possibly Clives Moltrum. cc: Planning Dept. Building Dept. Zoning Dept. C.A.C N.Y.S.D.E.C. Army Corps of Engineers TRUSTEES SCOTT L. HARRIS John M. Bredemeyer, III. President Supervisor Henry P. Smith, Vice President Town Hall. 53095 Main Road Albert J. KmpskL Jr. P.O, Box ! 179 John L. Bednoski. Jr. Southold. New York 11971 John ~B. Tuthill BOARD ~OF TOWN TRUSTEES Fax (516) 765-t823 Telephone (516) 765- 1892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone [516) 765-1800 May 3, 1990 Mr. John Holzapfel, Chairman Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Holzapfel: Transmitted herewith is application No. 4-2-90-132 for a wetland application submitted by Peconic Associates in behalf of East End Seaport and Marine Historical Foundation. Please prepare a written report of findings and recommendations with respect to this application. Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB: jt TRUSTEES SCOT1~ L. HARRIS John Mi Bredemeyer, III. President Supervisor Henry P. Smith. Vice President Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Albert J. Krupski. Jr, P.O. Box 1179 John L. Bednoski. Jr. Southold, New York 11971 John B. Tuthil] BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Fax (516) 765~1823 Telephone (516) 765-1892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516'~ 765-1800 TO: Harvey Arnoff, Town Attorney FROM: John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees RE: Permit fees on Non-profit Organizations DATE: May 3, 1990 Enclosed please find an application for the East End Seaport and Marine Historical Foundation to rebuild the light house at Orient Point. This is a non-profit organization and they request that the permit fees be waived. What is the Town policy on a situation like this? Your response is requested as soon as possible as the Board has started the review process. TRUSTEES L. HARRIS John M. Bredemeyer, tII. President Supervisor Henry P. Smith. Vice President 53095 Main Road Albert J. Fdmps~. Jr. P.O. Box 1179 John L. BednoskS. Jr. Sou~old. New York 11971 John B. Tumin BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Fax (516) 765-1823 TelephOne (516~ 765-1892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST TO: ~c~i ~ DATE: ~O~, 2, ~$ Enclosed is a permit application and a completed part v ~ uh~ Environmental Assessment Form. Southold Town Trustees are interested in your ageny's comments in acting as SEQRA Lead Agency for: T~ MAP: g/~ PE~IT $ ~k~a~ DESCRP~: Se~ ~ PE~IT REQUIRED: (~TO~ WETL~ ( ) OTH~ SEQg CLASSlFICkTION: ( ) Type I ( ) Type II (~UNLISTED [~ CEA Please contact John ~. Bredemeyer, III, ~resident, within 30 days and be advised that the Southold Town Trustees (W~T)/(DO NOT W~T) to ass~e lead agency. SENT TO: DOS ( ) DEC ~) DOH { ) PB { ) ZBA { ) B~ ( ) Please complete, detach and return this form to expedite processing~ Involved Agency: Project Name: Location: SCT , We at (Have objection to So~thold Town ASENCY Trustees assumaing Lead Agency. ~, Comments/Reasons: 990 Signature of AuthOrized Representative Town Hall. 53095 Maim Ro~d P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York ~lI~.qqZl (5t6] 765-1801 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL To: Sou thold Town Trustees From: Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Dated: May 22, 1990 Re: Recommendation of Wetland Applications The following recommendations were made by the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council at its meeting held Thursday, May 17, 1990: On a motion by John Holzapfel, seconded by Margaret Feeney it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval with conditions Wetland Application No. 3-5-90-79-4.5 submitted by Glenn E. Just/J.M.O on behalf of Harbor Lights Canal Association to maintenance dredge and place spoil on adjacent beach. The CAC approves provided the dredging is delayed until September to avoid the normal summer complications of dredging and also that the spoil is contained by haybales, etc. to avoid runoff into the cove side. Harbor Lights Drive, Southold Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion by John Holzapfel, seconded by Bruce Loucka it was RESOVLED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees disapproval of Wet[and Application No. 3-6-90-1-q submitted by J.M.O. Consulting on behalf of William Riley to construct a timber bulkhead and backfill structure with clean sand. The CAC recommends disapproval because no need is shown and a dock is already in place. Cedar Point Drive West, Southold Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion by Margaret Feeney, seconded by John Holzapfel, it was -RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval with concerns of Wetland Application No. 3-2-90-59-1-21.6 submitted by the Land Use Company on behalf of Constantine Georgiopoulos to construct a single family dwelling, sanitary system, fill and driveway. The CAC approves but has grave concerns regar.ding the cesspool system. Lake Drive, Southold Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion by John Holzapfel, seconded by Margaret Feeney it RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees of ~et and App i~a[ion No.~I-2~90-132 submitted I~as~ Ehd se~por~ and Marine H Storical Four lighthouse. The CAC recommends approval b. ut sugg~ 5/17/90 ~ Page 2 sanitary system be used (Clives Moltrum?). Gardiner's Bay Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. The Conservation Advisory Council has no recommendation concerning Wetland Application No. 4-3-90-9-3-10.1 submitted by Docko, Inc. for Peter O. Crisp to construct a fixed wood dock, floating dock, ladder and piles. The Council was unable to make an inspection on Fishers Island. The Council also approved the Waiver Requests of William Droeger and C. Kenneth Morrelly. ' t PR~)JECT I'D' NUMBER ~ t 617.21 SEQ~ Appendix C State Environmental Quality Rev~e~ SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL;ASSESSMENT FOR ~or UNUSED ACTIONS Only PART I--PROJECT iNFORMATION ~o b~ completed 9y Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPE~CANTISPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME ~st ~d S~ & ~ine, ~storical F~d. ~ng ~ch ~ ~g Light Restoration ,3. p~C~ LOCA![ON: Mu~ict~t~ ~u~old County Suffo~ 4. PReCiSE LOCATION (~reet address a~d road {at~s~tions, prominent landmarks etc. or p~ovfde map) R~k fo~tion 650 ~r~ of ~ng ~ch ~int. ~t N 4t. 06 31 ~ng~W 72 t8 25 [S~ attached) 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: [~] New [~ Expansion [~]Modiffcationlalterat[on Replacement ' ' 6. DESCRISEPROJECT BRIEFLY: Repla~t of a historic s~c~e of ~ty, S~te ~d Nati~al int~st. ~t~ repla~t, ~e ~st ~d will ~-tight ~d ~ ~ovide ~k~g of a ~t~al ~z~ ~d ~rove m~it~ ~fety for ~1 ves~ls ~ter~g ~d lea~g Peco~c ~ ~d ~e ~rs of ~e~, ~i~t ~d ~g ~ well as ~r~ches to ~v~head, 7. AMOUNT OF ~ND AFF~TED! Initially ~ acres Ultimately ~ acres 8. WILL PROPOSE~ ACTION COMPLY WITH ~tSTING ZONING OR O~ER ~ISTING ~ND USE RESTR~C~ONS? ~ Yes ~ No If No. describe briefly WHAT ~S PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? [] Residential [] Industrial [] Commercial [] Agriculture ~ Park/Forest/Open space [~ Other Descrrbe: Open water ( Gardiner m s Bay ) , 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAl OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? []Yes [] NO If yes, llst agency(s) and Detroit/approvals NY State D~C NY State Executive Department Uo S. Army Corp of Engineers Town of Southold and Village of Greenport Building Permit: 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [] Yes ~] No If yes, list agency name and =ermit/approval 72. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERM T/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? I CERTIFY THAT THE INPORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE iS TRUE TO THE SE~T OF MY KNOWLEDGE App{icantls[3onsor name: 0ate: I If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the - Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TY~-E ~dRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR. PART 817. t27 if yes, cc. ,late the rewew process and use the Bo WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.67 If No, a negative may De superse~d by another J~volvea agency. C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIA~D WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers m~y be handwritten, it legible) potential for eromon, drainage or ~looding problems? ~piain briefly: Bo C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, h[stori~ or other n~tural or cultural re~urces; or community or ~eighborhood characte~ ~plain b~f~y: ~o ~. Ve¢e~tion or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife speme~ sfgnific~t habitats, or ~reatened or endangered species? ~plsin bNefl~ Bo C4. A community's existing plans or goals as of f[ci~gy adopted, or a chide in use or i~tensity of use of lend ~ o[h~ natural re~urces? Explai~ brief Bo C5. Growt~ subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? ~plain briefly. Bo C6. Long term. short [erin. cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1~57 ~plain briefl% C7. Other impacts (inclUding changes in use of either quantity or type of energy}? ~p[~n bdefly. Bo C. IS THERE~ OR IS THERE Li~,ELY TO BE. CONTROVERSY RELATED TC POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? [] Yes [~ No If Yes, exl~latn briefly PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE Cio be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS.' For each adverse effect identified above determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a setting iLe. urban or rur¢l); (b) probability Of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and If) magnitude, If necessary, add attachments or,reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that ail relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequatmy addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts whic~l MA'/' occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. [] Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any SUpporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: Struetuml-ArehaeologtcaI A~e~sment Form (Addendum to EAF) ~st ~ S~ ~d ~ine ~stori~l Fo~tion Applicant Name: ~. ~ Project ~cation: ~ti%ude ~d ~n~it~e P~t I: Proj~t ~fermation (App~cant} t. Is D,-ojecdt continguo'us to, or c~o~tain a s~ructure or archaeological site l~sted in the State/National l{egister Of ~{sto~ ~c Piaees? yes ~ X no 2. Approximate percentage of prooosed~ .Project site with slopes; {]-10% c~.._, 10-15% %; 15% or greater %. N/A 3. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with the following drainage charac- ......... teristics:- ~wel} drained %: moderately~ well drained %; poorly drained %. (Use the Soil Survey classifications for your county).' Rock Foundation 4. Has /he land within .the proposed project area been previously disturbed/__~_t.e_~e_d_ ---(excavated, mined, landscaped, filled~, utilities-installed)? yes X no If yes~ briefly describe each. 5. Are there any buildings/structures built prior to 1940 and/or listed on the State Register of Historic Places within or ~adjacent to the proposed project area? yes no X If "yes", ?ovide the following information for each building/structure (,use attachments if needed): a.) Type of structm-e Ieg. ~ouse, outbuilding, barn, bridge, dam tunnei), b.) location, c.) appro×~m ate age. Photographs which illustrate the general nature of the p~ject area can a~ist the environmental analyst in hisTner review. SubmittaI~of photos is optional and n~ot a required component of the initial EAF. Part ]I: Evaluation (Environmental Analyst) 1. Archaeological Concerns a.) Is the proposed action within a circle or square identified on the OPRHP maps? yes__ no X b.} Is the area un~e.' revie~v apparently undisturbed? yes no X (Please contact CP~S for assistance in evaluating disturbance.) c.) Will the p~oposed action include a physical disturbance of the area? yes no X d.) is the slope in the area less than 15%?* yes no N/A * Unless on limestone/flint escarpments. '---- If-the-~nswer is yes to-~dI-of-the preceding questions£refer-to-the Cultural Resouree-Sectiom ...... 2. Structural Concerns Will the project alter the physical character or sightline of any building or structure _. built prior to 1940 or listed on the State/National Register of Historic Places? No If "yes=, refer to the Cultural Resource Section and provide photographs for each hi.storie structure affected. Part III: Determination -- Eefered to the Cultural p~esouree Section for review. -- No referral to the Cultural t~esource Section. SHPA lleview complete- Date w Signature of Prepar~ DEC Permit Number DEC 3185 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOW oF SOUrHO[D l, 0 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 APPLICATION IS H~Y ~E TO THE TO~ TRUSTEES, ~ OF SO'HOLD, SUFFO~ COUNt, N~ YO~, FOR ~E ISSU~CE OF A PE~IT PURSUIT TO THE LAWS, ORDIN~CES ~D ~GULATIONS GOVE~ING THE COAST~ ~D I~IOR ~T~DS, ~OOD PLAINS ~D D~INAGE ~AS OF SOU~OLD TO~, ~ ~ iSSU~CE OF PE~ITS PURSUIT ~ C~T~ 32 OF THE CODE OF ~E TO~ OF SOUTHO~. East End APPLICANT'S NAME: Seaport and Marine Historical Foundatio~EL. NO. 516-47720030 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 612, East Marion, New York 11939 AGENT: Peconic Associates TEL NO. 516-477-0030 AGENT ADDRESS: 1 Bootleg Alley, Greenport, New York 11944 PERMIT REQUESTED TO: Reconstruct historic lighthouse constructed in 1870 and destroyed in 1963 - see attached plan. Also SEE ADDt~NDUM LOCATION OF PROPERTY FOR REQUESTED PERMIT: Rock foundation 650 yards SW of Long Beach Point. Lat N 41° 06' 31" Long W 72° 18' 25", (See attached) HAMLET:- Temporarily - Village of Greenport TAX MAP NO: 1000- N/A CREEK, BAY OR HARBOR FRONTING PROPERTY: SIZE OF PROPOSED WORK: LENGTH: 36 ' WIDTH: 36' Page 2. YDS. TO BE EXCAVATED: 0 YDS. TO BE FILLED: 0 MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED: N/A WIDTH OF CANAL, CREEK OR BAY FRONTING PROPERTY: N/A DEPTH AT LOW TIDE: 3' to 12' AVER. RISE IN TIDE: -+ 2.5' DISTANCE TO NEAREST CHANNEL: Less than 100' DISTANCE PROJECT EXTENDS BEYOND SIMILAR PROJECTS IN AREA: N/A AREA ZONING: N/A IS PROJECT FOR PRIVATE OR BUS. USE: INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY: Historic and Federal Navigational Aid DESCRIBE KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON PREMISES: Lighthouse 1870-1963 HAS ANY PRIOR LICENSE OR PERMIT BEEN ISSUED TO ERECT STRUCTURES, DREDGE, OR DEPOSIT FILL ON SAID PREMISES: Yes. Construction of a lighthouse by the U. S. Coverr~ent in 1870. HAS ANY LICENSE OR PERMIT EVER BEEN REVOKED OR SUSPENDED BY A GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY: No DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION OF PROPERTY: See Attached DESCRIBE PROPOSED CONDITION OF PROPERTY AFTER WORK IS COMPLETED. INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITE IF NECESSARY: Restored to original design - see attached plan. ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED WHICH WOULD PROHIBIT THIS PROJECT: No WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER IF NOT THE SAME AS APPLICANT: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) STATE OF NEW YORK ) BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND SAYS THAT HE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS, AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT, IF GRANTED. IN iCATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE ~TRUSTEES, THEIR ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. Signature of Applica~f SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS I~-~5~ DAY OF ~ , 19 ~ CRYSTAL ROOK ~ NOTARY PUBLIC (~u~d in Su~fo~ Cour~y EXAMINED BY APPROVED DISAPPROVED CONDITIONS (If any) SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN COMPUTATION OF FEES Approved 2/27/85 Board of Trustees 3 ~une 21, 1990 ALBERT ERUPSK!: When did this application come in? When did you apply for this? LAR~ Ff~TZEN: I think it was May or June of 88. jOHN, BREDEMEYER: Anyqne else wishing to speak on this application? The intervening for the initial application...did it take that long to get DEC and Army Corp. current approvals? LARRY MATZEN: Yes. Just last month we received the Army. JOHN BRED~EYER: And the spoil site the historic spoil site that you have used on the current? LAPd%Y MATZEN: Only on the east side. The DEC would not allow the west side. JOHN BREDEMEYER: Have you ever had any Tern nesting on your spoil site after you have placed soil? LARRY MATZEN: No. JOHN BREDEMEYER: Just on the off chance that you would have you might wanu to notify the DEC some Spring if you did see them show up, so that they corded the area up to protect the birds. LARRY MATZEN: No, the kids run through it. ALBERT KRUPSKI: Too much activity. WARREN SAMBACH: There is a lot of activity there from the Spring to the Fall. JOHN BREDEMEYER: O.K. Are there any other questions or comments? If there are no further comments we will make a motion to close the hearing. A motion was made byALBERTKRUPSKI and seconded by JOHN TUTHILL to close the public hearing. VOTE OF THE BOARD: ALL AYES. A motion was made by JOHN TUTHILL and seconded by JOHN BEDNOSKI to approve this application to dredge. JOHN BREDEMEYER: The next application is in the matter of East End'Seaport & Marine Historical Foundation to reconstruct historic lighthouse constructed in 1870 and destroyed in 1963. Located at rock foundation 650 yards SW of Long Beach Point. JOHN TUTHILL: What did we have to do with this? It seems strange to me that we are involved. JOHN BREDEMEYER: We are involved because the depth of water around old light house is no longer the eight to' ten feet that it use to ben It is less then five feet to bottom at mean low water and it comes under the wetlands permits in the town. The3 are not going to have ~ny sanitary facilities~ nar any use. It is going to be stric~I~ a historic and signaling str~ctufe.. Is there anyone here to speak on behalf of this application? Anyone here to speak against this application? As a matter of record the Trustees' have already waived the fees on this application. This is considered in the public interest. It will not only be a beak in the mariners, it will be reconstruction of the famous light house that was known as the bug light that was there. It is quite an under taking. It is probably one of~ the fastest, at least seems to be well on the way in being one of the fastest light house renovations in the east done strictly through private funding. It is a real n~ce pro3ect for the area. In any case. JOHN BEDNOSKI: Move to approve. Board of Trustees ~ 4 ~.jne 21, 1990 JOHN TUT}{ILL: Second. JOHN BREDEMEYER: Ail in favor? VOTE. OF T~E BOARD: ALL AYES. JOHN BREDEMEYER: We didn't close the hearing on that. We approved as part of the hearing. That is a first. JOHN BREDEMEYER: The nex~ application is Brent Bookmiller to construct a single family dwelling, well and associated sanitary system. Proper~y located at Deep Hole Road, Mattituck. Is there anyone here who wishes to speak on behalf of this application? This application apparently may be on a lot which is not a legal building lot. I have reviewed this aspect with the Town Attorney and he said we strictly don't determine buildabi!ity. We issue permits for wetlands and itis not really...although in an ideal sense it might be nice that we would look at everything as far as buildability too. We don't. He suggested since we have previously approved the application on a prior permit and it is the same application now, %hat if the Board does approve, that we put a disclaimer on it that the Board does not determine buitdabiii%Y and that this may not be used as a representation for any other Board as to buildability or its applicable compliance with local zoning. ALBERT KRUPSKI: The only thing I want to check is to see if the runoff was contained in dry wells. BRUCE LOUCKA: Do you have our letter on it? JOHN BREDEMEYER: Yes. BRUCE LOUCKA: We approved with stipulations. JOHN BREDEMEYER: O.K. ALBERT KRUPSKI: I think you wanted a 45', we went for a 35' buffer. BRUCE LOUCKA: We came up with that because we said to move the house further, go for a variance and move it closer to the road. That way you can get a little more buffer in the back. Did we say that in our letter? JOHlq BREDEMEYER: It didn't go into the specifics, but you might have said it previously. Oh, yes you do. Site the house closer to the road as much as zoning will allow. BRUCE LOUCKA: Is there a 30' set back? Even if it is an undersized lot? JOHN BREDE~EYER: I don't know how that works. ALBERT ~_RUPSKI: I don't know. Do they have a DEC permit for this? JOHN BREDEMEYER: I don't know. They should have a proposed dwelling with a 37' set back and 55' from M~W on the original map. ALBERT K_~UPSKI: We didn't feel that a really'large buffer was necessary there. We would like to see a large one where there is a possibility of wild life habitat. In this case we are just trying to prevent nutrients and material from entering the creek. We are not really looking at this because it is built up there. We are not really looking... JOHIq BREDEMEYER: We could request that it be located as close as the existing zoning would permit. Then if it could actually go all the way up closer to What existing structures are in the · .~4-1a;2 ~ 187)-7. c ;' '" 617.21 Appendix A SEC State Environmental Quality Review -' FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to hetp applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner. Whethe; a proje( or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easyto answer. Frequen ]Y,-there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determin significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environment~ theanalysiS'questionln additiOn.of significance.many who have knowleege in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affectin The fuji EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determinatio process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fita project or actior Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides obiective data and information about a given project and its site. By i~J~tifyi~g basic projec data. i~t assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 anc~ 3. Pa~t 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur {rom a projector action. It provide: guidance as to whether an im pact is likely to be considered small to moderate ,or whether it is a potentiail,, large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. ._~ Part 3:impactlf any impactis actuallvin Partimportant.2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used ~o evaluate whether or not th( DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type 1 and Unlisted Actions UuonldentifYreviewthe PortiOnSof the of EAF completed for this project: ~] Part 1 ~ Part 2 ' I-IPart 3 informatio~ recorded this EAF 1 and 2 a'nd 3 if appropriate}, and any otb-er supporting informauon, and considering both the mag~tude and importance['Parts of each impact, it is reasonably detonated by the lead agency mat: [~ A. The project will not result m any large and important im gact{s) and. therefore, is one which will not have a significantthe impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although project have a significant effect on the environment, there will ~ot be a significant effect for th~s Uni rsted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have ~een required. therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' [~ C. The prolect may result in one or more large and important imoacts tha: may have a si~i~icant impact o~ the environment, therefore a positive declaratio~ will be prepared. · A Conditioned Negative Declaratio~ is only vaiid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action, SOUTHQLD BOARD_ OF TOWN TRUSTEES Name oi he,'~d Agency -- [Ioh~ M. gredemeyer, III p . Pr.nt~or rypeNameot~.-'~,,+*bleO[ficerin .,,..~ . ,. ~ resident, g_oard of Trustees .Z"~,'~"~[u~e of ResponslbLle Officer ir L~'ad Aoe-,',, ~ . - '-' /' ', '"~ ~gnature ot Pr Parer ( t d~tterent trom responsible Date P~t 2--PROJF. CT IMPACTS AND ,~EIR I~AAGNtTUDE . . Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) o In completing the form the re'ziewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and deterrr nations reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be a~ expert environmental' analyst. · Identifying that an impact will he potentially large (column 2) does not mean.that it is also necessarily signif c AnYasks largethat itimpaCtbe IOOkedmUStatbefurther.eValuated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of. impacts and wherever, possible the thresho magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The exarr eles are generally applicable tfiroughout the State for most situations. But, for any Specific project or site other examples for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3~nd/°r lower thresholds may be approp~ ·haveThe impactSbeen offered°f eaCnas guidancePr°ject' They°n eachdo notSite'constitutein each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative' · an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds tOanswer each quest · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions [Read carefully) - a. Answer each of the 19 questions ip PART 2. AnSWer Yes if there wdl be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be Considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any exam ~le provided, check column 2.1F ~mpact will occur but thresh is lower than example, check colurr n 1, d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially ~arge and proceed' to PART e. If a POtentiaI]y large impact checked in col Jmn 2 can be mitigated by Change(s) in the prolect to a small to moder, impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. T must be explained in Part 3. Small to Potential Can Impact IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated 8v 1. Will the proposed action result ~n a physical change to the project sib ,? impact Impact Project Chan~ Examples that would apply to column 2 ~NO ~]y S , · Any construction on slooes of 15% or greater, I;15 foot rise per 100 [] [] []Yes 10%.fo°t of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed ~Nc ·3C°nstructi°nfeet. on land where the ~epth to the Water table is less than [] [] []Yes [~Nc · Constructlor of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. [] [] []Yes ~No · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within [] 3 feet of ex~sting ground surface. ~ []Ye~. []No ·thanC°nstructi°none ~hasethatorWillstage.C°nhnue for more than 1 year or involve more [] [] [~Yes ~]No · Excavation for mining purposes th~ t would remove more than 1,000 Ions of natural material (i.e., rock or soilJ per year, [] ~]Yes ~No · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction m a designated floodway. [] [] ~Yes ~No · Other nnpacts _ [] [] ~tes []No [] [] E~¥es []No the s~te?' (i.e.,' cbffs,' dunes, geological formations, etc. n~ 2 Will there ;e an effect t~....~y u.,que or unusual land for EL ' Specific )'~O ~YES land forms: ~'-- I 2 ~ 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small [o Potential t Can Impact 3. Will Proposed action affect any water bodv designated as Drotected? Moderate Large Mitigated B (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of.the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) Impact lmpa~t Project Chap N~O IZ]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ' Developable area of site contains a protected water body. [] J-J' E/lYes J-IN · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a [] l--J []Yes J--IN protected stream. · Extension of utilit;F distribution facilities through a protected water body. [] [] []Yes []~ · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. [] · Other impacts: [] [] r-lyes []N 4. Will proposed action affect any non-pt'otected existing or new body of water.~ X~1NO r-lyES Examples that would apply to column 2 · ^ 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water [] [] ~J~es or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. ° Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. [] [] []Yes J-IN, · Other impacts: [] [] []Yes 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwate quality or ouantity? ~NO Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will_require a discharge permit. [] [] ~-~Yes []N, · Proposed Action reouires use of a source of water that does .not [] [] []Yes have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from welts with ~reater than 45 [] J~ []Yes gallons ~er mint. Ee pumping ca DaCitV. ·suppJyC°nstructi°nsystem°r operation cgusing any contamination pt a water [] [] []Yes []N~ · Proposed Action wi adversely affect groundwater. [] F-I []Yes · Liquid effluent will be conve'/ed off the site to facilities which presently [] [] []Yes J~N, do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 ~aJlons per [] [] day. []Yes · Proposed Action will Jikeh., cause siltation or other discharge into an [] [] E~]Yes existing body of water to the extc. nt that there will ~e an obv~ pus v~sual contra;t to natural conditions · Proposed Action will require the StOrage of petroleum or chemical fi- [] J~Yes.. []Nc products greater than 1,100 Eallons. ·and/orPr°p°sedsewerACti°nserv~ces.will allow residential uses in areas w~thout water [] [] []]Yes I'-JNe ? · Proposed Action ~ocates camrr,ercial and,'or ieduslri,~ uses which m]v [] ~ J~Yes J-~Ne · Other__impacts:- [] [] J~'t'es J~No 6 Will proposed action alter drair,~qe fh~w or patterns, or suriace water runolF,~ ~,~'O ~YES J Examples that would apply to colu~nn 2 · Proposed Action would ch3nge flood water flows. L' '[] t--t ~.Yes 7 -- Small to an I ct Moderate ,Large I Mitigated B impact ,mpact l P_roject than · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. [] [] - []Yes []h · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. [] [] []Yes []N · Proposed Action wi{i allow deve{opment in a designated floodway, · Other impacts: [] El []Yes []N [] [] ' []Yes []N I~PACT ON AIR 7, Will proposed action affect air qualitv~ "~O E]YES Examples that would apply to co{umn 2 ·hour.Pr°p°sed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any gwen [] [] []Yes []N( ·refusePr°D°SedperACti°nhour, will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of [] [] []Yes · Emission rate of tota{ contaminants will exceed 5 {bs. per hour or a [] [] []Yes heat Source producing more than !0 million 8TU's per hour. ·toPr°p°sedindustrialaCti°nuse.Wiil allow an increase in the amount of land COmmitted [] [] []Yes []Nc · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial [] [] ~]~es ~]No development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: [] [] []Yes []Nc IM. PACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ~NO I~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reducuon of one or more species listed on tee New York or Federal ~ [] []Yes E]No list, using tee s re, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or Significant wildlife habitat. [] [] []Yes []No · APplication of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other [] than for agricultural purposes. [~ []Yes .[~No · Other impacts: [] [3 []Yes E:]No 9Will Prouosed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangereo species? '~NO [3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 '.Proposed Action would substantially interiCere with any resident or [] migratory fish, shellfish or svildlife species. [] ~Yes [~No · Proposed Action requfres the removal of more than 10 acres [] ~] [~Yes of mature forest [over 100 years or ageJ or other locally important []No vegel;atlOn. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 ~,¥JJJ tPe Proposed Action affect agricultural land resonrces? ~/NO ' E3YES Examples that would apply to COlum~ 2 t · The protaosed action would sever, cross or limit access to a~ricultural l [] ~ ~]Yes ~No lancl {includes cropland, hayhelds, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.} 8 ! 1 Potential [Can Impact Be 'J Small to 2 3 ~ Moderate Large / Mitigated By · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of I [] [] .,t~yes t--INo agricultural land. · The proposed action Would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres [] r-I l~Yes ["INo of agricu tural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural [] [] l-lYes I-']No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches. strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: [] [] []Yes []No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC; RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aestheuc resources? ~,10 I--lYES lit necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in ~'~ction 617.21, Appendix E~amples that would applv to column 2 · Proposed land uses. or project cotm Portents obviously different from [] [:-1 []Yes []No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural · Proposed land uses, or project Components visible to users of ~ [] []Yes []bio aestheuc resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enioyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project com3onents that will result in the elimination or significant [] [] E]Yes []bio screemng of scemc views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: [] [] []Yes []No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action Impact an,,' site or structure%o__f ?storic, pre- historic or paleontological importance.~ ~1~_O F'IYES Examples that would applv to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantiailv [] [] [~Yes E]No contiguous to any facility or s~te listed on the State or Nation ai Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the E~ [] project site. I~' Yes [~]No · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for [] [] E]¥es [-'tNo archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: [] ' [] .[]Yes [] NO iMPACT ON OPEN SPAC2 AND RECREATION 13 Will. Proposed Action affect :he quantify or quality of existing or Ezamples that would apply to COlumn 2 ~'~¢0 []YES · [he permanent foreclosure of a future recrea.t~onaJ opportunity [] [] · A motor reduction of an open space unportant to the COmmun,t¥. [] [] E]Yes ~_~ · Other 'mpacts: "[] [] I-lYes []No 9 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION I ~ 3---- Small to Potential Can Impact 14 Will there, be an effect to existing transDortabon systems? Moderate Large Mitigated E Examples that would apply to column 2 "-CNn []YES Impact Impact Project Char · Alterabon of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. [] [] []Yes []p · Prooosed Action will result in major traffic problems. [] [] []Yes · Other impacts: [] '~' [~Yes IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? EzampJes that would apply to cotumn 2 ,,~O EYES · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of [] El [~Yes any form of energy in the municipality, · Prooosed Action w~ [ require the creauon or extension of an energy [] 0 t--lYes []N transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two famdv residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: [] ~ []Yes NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. 'C/ill there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result o ,he Proposed Acbon? 0 Examples that would apply to column 2 ·facil~tv.BIasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive [] [] []Yes r-[iN · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). [] [] []Yes []N~ · Pronosed Action will produce operating noise exceedin8 the local [] [] []Yes amb~en: noise levels for noise ou[s~oe or structures. ·no~sePr°n°seUscreen.ACti°n win remove natural barriers that would ac~ as a [] [] []Yes · Other impacts: [] [] E]Yes IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? Examples that would apply to column 2 ~NO E]YES · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazarcous [] [] [~Yes- E~Nc substances (i,e, oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of - accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in /he burial of "hazardous w,~stes" r~ any [] [] []Yes []Ne torm /i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reacu.ve, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storaqe facilities ior one rr Ilion or more gallons of liquified natural [] [] gas or omer flammable liquids. ~Yes I~No w~mm 2.000 feet or a sKe u~eo for the disposal ol; solid or hazardous · Othc, r ~mpacts: - ~ - .FI []Yes E]No 10 I 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact OF COMi~IUNITY OR NEt GHBORH 0OD Moderate Larcje Mitigated 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing~community-~ Impact Impact Project Chant Examples that would apply to column 2 '~NO r-WES . · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the [] [] [-]Yes project is Iocate~ is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or 0peratin~ services [] [] ' J--lYes will increase b'~' more than 5% per year as a result of this protect. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted 0tans or goals· [] [] [~]Yes J--]N~ · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. [] [] []Yes []N( · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures [] [] I-lYes or areas of historic importance to the community. ·(e.g.Devel°pmentschools, policeWill createand fire,a demandetc.) for additional Community services [] [-J' [-]Yes r-IN( · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future prolects. [] [] []Yes []N( · Proposed Action will create or eliminate err Dlovment. [] [] [ [~Yes i-IN( · Other irrDacts: [] [] []Yes []Nc 19. rs there, or is there likeiv to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental ~mpacts~ '~NO [~YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATIO J OF THE I JiPORTANC,-- OF 1 1,· ' Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact[s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact[s) may b miligated. Instructions Discuss the followin~ for each impact idenhfied in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 Briefly describe the ica;act. 2. Dbscnbe {if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to mooerat~, ~mpact by prolect change[s 3. Based on the informaEion avadable, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this ~mpact s important. To answer the question of ~mportance. consider: · The probability pt the ~mpact occurring · The durauon of the rmpact · Whether the imnact can or wdl be cantrolle~ HARVEY A. ARNOFF SCOTY L. HARRIS Town Attorney Supe~isor MATTHEW G. KIERNAN Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Assistant Town Attorney P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD .~,~ ~ ~ ~'~ 7 mORm MAY I 5 ;President, Boar~ of Trust~ FROM= Matthew ~. Kiernan ' ~ ~\ (~ Assistant Town Attorney ~ RE: Permit fees on Non-profit Organizations DATE: May 15, 1990 In response to your memo to Mr. Arnoff dated May 3, 1990 concerning the Town's policy of waiving fees for permit applica- tions submitted by non-profit organizations, please be advised that the Town Board has no written policy on this matter. The Board has exercised its discretion, however, to waive fees, on a case by case basis, where the circumstances dictate that a waiver is appropriate and/or will avoid hardship. When presented with such a situation, the Board typically requests a formal request from the applicant setting forth the circumstances which would warrant a waiver. This request may involve a. personal appearance by ~th~ applicant~before the B~ard. Since this application before you concerns a matter within the discretion of the Board of Trustees, it would seem reasonable to the Trustees ;hav~ the pow~ to waive permit situation warrants such treatment. I trust this memo is responsive to your request. Should you require anything further, please do not hesitate to contact me. / -~EAST END SEAPORT and MARINE f ~ HISTORICAL FOUNDATION J East Marion, New York 11939 ,~> , ~ ~' April 5, 1990 ~ of ~ ~st~s T~, ,S~U~DLD' ~ of S~old ~u~old ~ ~ ~in R~d ~u~old, New York 11971 Re: Long Beach Bar "Bug" Lighthouse Dear Board Members: Enclosed please find application for the restoration of Long Beach Bar "Bug" Lighthouse. Your early review would be greatly appreciated. As this is a historic restoration by a non-profit organization with support from the Federal, State and Town levels, a waiver of permit fees is requested. Very truly yours, Director ~W:BB Enclosures .- Review -- V;suat EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide add tonal information relat nfl to Quest on l 1 of Part 2 of the Full FAF. ' . .-~ (To be completed by Lead Agency) Visibility Distance Between - Project and Resource (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0.'/4 ,/4.1/2 V2-3 3-5 · A~ parcel of land which is dedicated to and available [] ~] [] [] [] to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural, or man-made scenic qualities3. · An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public [], []-._ [] [] [] · - obb?vation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · A ~ite or structure listed on the National or State [] [] [] [] [] RegiSters of Historic Places? · State Parks? [] [] [] [] [] · The State Forest Preserve? [] [] [] [] [] · National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges2 E~ [] [] [] [] · National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding [] [] [] [] [] · natural features? · National Park SerVice lands? [] [] [] [] [] · Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic [] [] [] [] [] or Recreational? · Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such [] [] []- [] [] as part of the interstate System, or Amtrak? · A governmentally established or designated interstate [] E3 [] [] [] or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? ·scenic?A site, area. lake, reservoir or highway designated as [] [] [] [] [] · Municipal park, or designated open space? [] [] [] [] [] · County road? [] [] [] [] [-f · State? [] [] [] [] [] · Loca road? [] [] [] 1-]_ [] 2.seasons)IS the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e.. screened by summer foliage, but visible during other []Yes ~No 3. Are any of the resources checked tn question 1 used by the public during the time:-of year during which the project wilt be visible? - [] Yes Im No 1 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. , . Within *I/4 mile * 1 mile Essentially undeveloped [] [] Forested [] [] Agricultural [] [] Suburban residential [] [] Industrial [] [] Commercial [] [] Urban [] [] River, Lake. Pond [] . . [] Cliffs, Overlooks [] [] Designated Open Space [] [] Flat [] [] Hilly [] [] Mountainous [] [] Other [] [] NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually, similar projects within: ' V2 mile []Yes [5~No *I miles ~-'] Yes '2 miles 'E~ Yes IX[No *3 miles I--] Yes ~--~No · Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely, to observe the proposed project is _ 10,000 NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work [] [] [] [] Involved m recreational activities [] [] [] [] Routine travel by residents [] [] [~ .[] At a residence [] [] [] [] At worksite [] [] [] [] Other Boatinq [] [] [] ~] 2 ADDm~/JM Re: East End Seaport and Marine Historical FouD~ation PERMLIT REQUESTS3 TO: Replacement of a historic structure of Ccmmunity, State and National interest. After replac~ent, the Coast Guard will re-light and thereby provide marking of a natural hazard and improve maritime safety for all vessels entering and leaving Peconic Bays and the _h~rbors of Greenport, Orient and Dering as well as approaches to Riverhead, Southold, Southampton and the Shinnecock Canal. ~ 0 N C I S L A N PROPOSED RERTORA~OH OF A~ACE~ P~OPER~ OWN~S: 1/2 1 EAST ~D SgAPO~T a MAm~ I i II ; I /- CONe. FOUNDATION / ' [ ~ /EL 13. O' APPROX. ~ Il Il ~ / ' ~ ' -- PORCH OVERHANGl ~l ~ : l ~'x /'/ l: ITl i it: I: x'/ x'. i /I;I [ iii il ~y x:..%. I I l t .I x" 'o '1 LES ~ EXISTING STO~E AND -- ~ / / RUBBLE MOUND puR~f: PMPOl~ ~STORA~ OF HISTOriCAL RESTORA~O. PLAN LONG ~ACH BAR LIGHT ~ MEAN LOW WATER ~LWI 0 1~ ~F~ CO~TY ~W YO~ ORIENT 8EACH STATE PARK GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET HISTORICAL FOUNDA~ON ~A~ a0~A.~lc~o DA~ MAR 30, 19~I~ET 2 ~ 2 LONG BEAC~aAR (BUG)LIGHT RESTORATIO~PLANS APRIL 1990 PURPOSE= HIST~ICAL RES*ORAnOH PROPOS~ R~TORA~ON OF V~C~ ~ LONG BEACH BAR LIGHT ~ ~{ENT ~EA~ $TA~ PARK G~HIC SCALE IN MILES ~$TORICAL FOUNDA~ON //'~__~EA"~T END SEAPORT~and MARINE ~ H~SToRIGA I. FOUNDATION j ,..o. Box.6,2 . ~ East Marion, New York 11939 LONG BEACH BAR (BUG) LIGHT RESTORATION PLANNING REPORT April i990 A project planning report is being prepared each month to provide an updated status report of the project's p!anning effort. ORGANIZATION ENTITY The East End Seaport and Marine Historical Foundation is a non-profit organization whose purpose is the preservation, restoration, and recognition of the Marine and Seaport History of Eastern Long Island. Its first project will be the restoration of Long Beach qar (Bug) Light at the entrance to Peconic Bays. The tax exempt organization's entity is the Eastern Long Island Marine Foundation. DIRECTORS Sarah M. Sands Merlon E. Wiggin George Rowsom Active and dedicated committees have been set up to plan the overall restoration effort: OVERALL PLANNING INCLUDING FUNDRAISING AND PUBLICITY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION Merlon E. Wiggin Chairman Sarah M. Sands Chairman Stephen Clarke Herbert Mandel Robert I. Brown James & Nancy McCarthy Greg Scholand Linda Holmes Herbert Mande! Scott Harris Jackie Copas ADMINISTRATIVE HISTORICAL (Legal, Financial and Accounting) George Rowsom Chairman Frank "Sparky" Coyle Chairman and Treasurer James Monsell John Kramer George Morton Michae! Hall, Esq. Rodman Pell Benjamin Sokobin, C.P.A. Beverly Bredemeyer [sabelle Wiggin EXISTING LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION After a year long investigatEve effort the State of New York has claimed ownership and has agreed to issue a permit to the East End Seaport and ~istoricaI Marine Foundation to reconstruct the lighthouse. RECONSTRUCTION METHODOLOGY To facilitate the restoration of the lighthouse the structure wi11 be totally rebuilt on the mainland and moved to its originat repaired foundation. This methodology will facilitate its reconstruction by the easy availability of services, personnel, and materials. SITE OF RESTORATION Greenport Yacht & Shipbuilding Steve Clarke has donated the use of a portion of the shipyard for the reconstruction of the lighthouse. The site is easily accessible from lower Main Street and is adjacent to a former marine railway, simplifying the transfer of the completed structure to the transport barge. The site has been cleared and plans are being made to fence the construction area. Four foot high fencing is planned so as to permit con~inual public viewing. ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL PLANNING Doug Peix of Peix and Crawford, Rob Brown of Fairweather- Brown, and Paul Millman of Superstructures, Inc. are nearly complete on the architectural and structural planning of the lighthouse. The present foc'us ~s on t~e methodology of movement from the reconstruction site to the lighthouse base, especially as it effects structu[al detait. Discussions are presently under way wi~h representatives of North Fork Welding, Costello Marine and Davis Brothers. Present considerations include the possibility of using a barge-mounted crane to transfer the lighthouse onto the foundation. PERMITS Permit applications have been completely drafted by Peconic Associates and, as soon as finalized, are ready for forwarding to New York State Coastal Zone Management, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the Building Departments of the Town of Southotd and the Village of Greenport. Permit application drawings were prepared as a donation by John Bondarchuck of Orient. The format and language of the use permit from the State of New York is complete and has been reviewed by Mike Hall and is ready for forwarding. Mike Hall is also proceeding on the legal arrangements for the use and ownership of the property which will follow the interim permit arrangement. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Secretarial and flllng services as well as supplies are being donated by Beverly Bredemeyer and Stirllng Com~uter Service. Office, meeting space, telephone and fax servlces are being supplied free of charge by Peconic Associates. INSURANCES John Kramer of East End Insurance is nearly complete on planning for ~nsurance coverage, which will include bonding of ail of those who handle finances, liability insurance for the leased property, and coverages required by New York State. An inexpensive workmen's comprehensive plan has been worked out to cover all those who will actually work on the reconstruction of the lighthouse. RELIGHTING OF THE LIGHT Thanks to the assistance of Lt. Comm. Garrett, United States Coast Guard, confirmation has been obtained that the light will be relit utilizing Coast Guard supplied equipment. The lighthouse will be placed on charts as an official navigational aide. Details on the maintenance of the light are still being reviewed with the Coast Guard. HISTORY OF THE LIGHTHOUSE Rodman Pell, George Morton, and others are actively working to collect information relating to the history of "Bug" Light. Ads have been olaced in recent papers asking for anyone who has information, pictures, and so forth of the lighthouse to contact them so that they may be included in the book. Bob and Nancy Hungerford have volunteered to provide the graphic design and production of the book. RECEPTION Thanks to the generosity of Mrs. Lucy Thompson (who was our first major donor), a special reception for the supporters and prospective supporters is being held in her home in Orient. Complete architectura! drawings and Rich Fiedler's painting of the lighthouse will be on display. Coast Guard officials wi11 do a briefing on the "Bug" Light relighting. Jim and Nancy McCarthy worked closely with Lucy in the organizing of the reception. LocaI wine is being supplied by Jackie Copas of the Rhumb Line Restaurant. PUBLICITY AND FUND RAISING This phase of the project is naturally the most important of a11. Sarah M. Sands of Marston Associates, Marketing Consultants, is directing this very important phase of the project as a donation assisted by James and Nancy McCarthy. An important aspect of this is the establishment of the Founders Council and Charter Membership. Donations of $2,000.00 or more in cash are required for Charter Membership, simil.ar donations in goods and services for Founders Council Membership. Benefits to these two groups include a signed, limited edition print of the lighthouse by Richard Fiedler, an autographed collectors edition history of Bu g Light, their names on a bronze pIaque, membershlp in East End Seaport and Marine Historical FJundation, and a tour of the comp1.~ted structure. A previously established tax exempt Foundation (Eastern Long Island Marine Foun'dation) has ~a~e the lighthouse reconstruction its sole project, thus prolviding an immediate tax exempt status for the organization, making all donations tax ~eductible. The individuaI respon~Se and the financial support and interest in th~s pro~ect hlas been especially enthusiasti~c and gratifying. The donations in support Of the project have been gen~erous and are insuring that the Iig~thouse restorat'ion wil! be a reality. A principal source of funds will be from membership in the East End Seaport and Marine Historical Foundation. A membership drive ir scheduled for April and May of this year. Rodman Pell has done a painting of the lighhouse and all East End Seaport Members wi11 be automatically entered in a drawing for the painting, a hooked rug by Ga11Horton, and a model of the lighthouse by James McMann. COMMUNITY SUPPORT Support by the Suffolk Times, Southold Rotary, the Stirling Historical Society, and the Eastern Long Island Yachting Association are the be§inning evidence of the public and community support this project has received. The Eastern Long Island Yachting Association has designated two premier sailing regattas to benefit the restoration ~roject (see schedule). POLITICAL SUPPORT This project has received extensive and committed political support by Congressman Hochbrueckner, Assemblyman Joseph Sawicki, the Town of Southold, the Town Shelter Island, and the Village of Greenport. Congressman Hochbrueckner's office has actively participated in obtaining Coast Guard support. Joseph Sawicki has made this project one of his top priority support efforts for our area. Both the Town of Southold and the Town of Shelter Island have passed Resolutions supporting the project. BUDGET The budget for the restoration project to include construction materials, labor, foundation, and relocation has been estimated at $103,000.00. Funds required are planned to be raised as follows: Charter Members and Founders Council $ 70,000.00 Donated Services and Material $ 25,000.00 Fund Raising Events, Raffles, Books, Etc. $ 5,000.00 Membership in East End Seaport and Marine Historical Foundation $ 3,000.00 Total - $103,000.00 SCHEDULE March 31, 1990 ...... Charter Members and Founders CGunci1 SociaI Event for Members and Prospective Members. May 1990 ......... Shelter Island Charter Member/ Founders Council Reception. May 20, 1990 ....... Heritage Day. July 4th, 1990 ...... Start of Construction Ceremony - Greenport Yacht & Shipbuilding. Fundraising Gala. July 21st, 1990 ..... Southold Town 350th Anniversary Regatta New Suffolk to Orient September 8th, 1990 - Historic Seaport Regatta - Sag Harbor to Greenport September 1990 - - Placement of Lighthouse. Date To Be Established - - Lighting Ceremony. (~~'~ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 JUDITH T. TERRY FAX (516) 765-t823 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 ~miSX~Aa O[ V~Ta~. STaX~SXmS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTItOLD THIS/S TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION I~AS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON MARCH 13. 1990: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby goes on record in support of the Long Beach Bar "Bug" Lighthouse Restoration Program. Southold Town Clerk~ March 15, 1990 JOHN F. HUDACS STATE OE ~EW YORK ROBERT B. ADAMS COMMISSiONeR EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT F~RST DEPUTY CO~ M~SS~O~ E~ OFFICE OF GENERAL SERVICES ,lAMES M. GALLAGHER THE GOVERNOR NELSON A. ROCKEFELLER EMPIRE STATE PLAZA AND UTILIZATION OaOUP ALBANY, N.Y. 12242 JOSEPH F. STELLATO January 26, 3.990 u~Lr~3~o. East End Seaport & Marine Historical Association P.O. Box 61~. East Marion, New York 11939 Dear Applicant: This agency has investigated the status of lands underwater adjacent to the Long Beach Bar Lighthouse to determine the interests of the State of New York in this parcel. Since this parcel is outside the grant of lands conveyed to The Orient Point State Park Commission and is no longer under the jurisdiction~ of the United States of America, it is under the sovereign authority of the State of New York. Under Section 3(2) of the New York State Public Lands Law, sovereign title to lands underwater is administered by the Commissioner of General Services. In order to undertake work on State-owned lands you will be required to hold the State of New York harmless against liability for injury caused by the proposed activity. Please complete th~ enclosed form and return it to the following address for review: New York State Office of General Services Division of Land Utilization Mayor Erastus Corning 2nd Tower Governor Nelson A. Rockefeller Empire State Plaza Albany, New York 12242 After review and execution by the Commissioner of General Services, the permit will be issued to your group for the activity specified. If you have additional questions, you may contact me at (518)474-2195. Chief, Bureau of Land Management Enc. COMMANDER JOHNSON AND LT COMMANDER GARRET SPEAKING AT THE COCKTAIL PARTY AT LUCY THOMPSON'S IN ORIENT CONCERN- FUNDING FOR "BUG" LIGHT-MARCH 31, ~990 COMMANDER JOHNSON(U.S. COAST GUARD, EAST MORICHES) First of all we have this presentation to the Foundation. Some of you maybe bet%er at Old English than I am. But, this is essentially a copy of the Ninth Law of the United States Congress, Which was signed on the Fourth of March One Thousand Seven- Hundred and Eighty nine. Ir'was an act of establish- ment of the First Light-houses, ~eacon, Bouy's, etc, in America, to support safe navigation in our harbors. It was signed on the 7th, ~789, By George Washin§ton, and by John Adams the Vice President. So, here's a copy for you for appropriate display at your opportunity. Mr. Wiggin: "Commander Johnson, I can't thank you enough." Commander Johnson: It is a pleasure~o be here and I really-ah obviously love the Co~st Guard, I love historic Coast Guard structures, I am very pleased with this effort to rebuild the light. We have had some very good success with the volunteer efforts we have observed in other ligh~ structures, such as Montauk Light. Montauk Light, Fire Island Light, are now effectively cared for by volunteer organizations. So, we are delighted with that kind of a relation-ship. I look with some saddness when I see the Coast Guard rebuilding the old white board stations with red roofs, and putting up brick buildings. I applaud your efforts to maintain the history of the Coast Guard Now, Bob Garrett, he's our "Aides to Navigation" expert." //While LT Commander Garrett got ready to speak, there was some talk about "Bug Light" or "Bud Light"// Mr Wiggin: We have taken a lot of kidding about that-- "Did you say 'Bud Light'--so we maybe hearing from them about that. LT Commander Bob Garrett: I've had three years experience at Coast Guard Headquarters as a Light House Automation Projects Officer, and in that job we have gotten a lot of criticism for taking people off light-houses. Let me explain that right now. We've done what we've done at Montauk Light, where pulled the Coast Guard family out. We put in a historical society and they interpret the light, and.it is more accessable to the public. 2. Now, many many many steps beyond that is what you all are doing here. In my three years down there and a year up here, and getting close contact with historical societies and Light-House groups nation- wide, this is the first project in the nation that would take an absolute RUIN with nothing there at all and rebuild the light-house. I think that speaks a lot for the local interest here and the efforts that you are doing. Many other places have taken Light-Houses that were either abandoned by the Coast Guard, or'eold off, as this one probably was, and allowed decay, and they have come into a ,pro3ect where the light- house was right there and come together and built it up. They had a rallying cry around that old structure that was out there, but, here you had a pile of_rocks basically, and I am totally impressed with the plans you've got and the efforts that have been made. One thing on the re-lighting. We've talked to the "Aid To Navigation Office in 8oston. There are two ways to relight the light. One is a Federal 3. Aid to Navigation~ the other is a privately owned Aid to Navigation. The Federal Command requires our approval to Federally maintain aid. What we look at is the service to the mariner. Is this light really necessary for safe navigation? 'Is it necessary? The other way to go is the privately maintained Aid to Navigation. Where as a community, you say, 'I want to rebuild the light.' The Coast~:Guard would grant you a permit to operate this site as a privately maintained aid to navigation. We got approval from Boston right now verbally to at least go with private aid. So, I can say with full assurance that this light will be lit. Further more, with Commander Johnson, and our Aid To Navigation team, we will provide the lighting equipment--solar panel, the battery, the lens, the flasher, changer, and all these things~ SO't~at will be something that we can provide at least. Right now we can say YES this will be lit as a Private Aid. We will study it a little bit more. later when we do our "Water Ways Analysis" for this area to see if it is appropriate for the Federal Government-to maintain an aid here. But, I can assure all of you right now that the Long Beach Bar 'Bug Light' will be lit as an Aid to Navigation. 4. U S ARMY CORPS JOINT APPLICATION FOR PERMIT [" ~ARTIC~ 15, TIT~ 15 ~6NYCRR ~ "[WATER SUPPL~ ~ 6NYCRR 602 (LONG IS~ND WELL) ~ARTI~ 15, TITLE 27 6NYCRR 666 ~[LD. fSdENIC AND RECREATIONAL RIVERSI 2. APPLICANT IS A/AN []Owne) ~Onerato~ ~Lessee [~Municipal[ty/Covernmental Agency .Check as many as apply) v~t End S~ ~d ~e His~ri~ Fo~tion ~. O. ~x 612 ~ (516) 477-0030 POST OFFICE ~ STATE ZiP CODE ~ ~ion, N~ York 11939 ~ ~ 11939 ~c .~iates I ~tl~ ~ey ~ (5~6~ 477-0030 ~ omc[ ~ sr~r[ ~ zw co~[ ~ ~ 11944 Cou.~ ~ffolk ~ow. or d~v ~u~old I wna~ ~rt (T~r~) 6. ~ OF S~E~ O~ SODY OF W~T~ ~' S ~y ~d ~i~t ~r ~Yes ~ 5h~ work on me~ ~nd]or drawing, 9. PROPOSED USE: = pHvate 10. PROPOSED STARTING DATE: j ~, ~PPROX,MATE COMPLETION DATE: J U. FEE OF (NYS Permit O.ly) ~ Public ~ Commercial J~y 4~ 1990 Sprig 1991 R~cti~ of ~s~ric ligh~ouse ~ct~ ~ 1870 ~ d~ ~ 1963. (S~ at~ a~) U. S. ~y ~ of ~s ~ S~te ~ ~t ~d of T~ ~t~s, ~ld ~.of ~u~old 8 Vil~ of : THE ARMYPERMIT :~' ' O~App;OVA~NO. Expires 30 June 1986 325) b authoHz~ by ~n 10 of the Ri~r and H~r A~ of 1899. ~on 404 o~ the , ~ion, R~ ~d ~n~ A~. Th~ laws ~uim ~rmies eu~horlzlng avi~b~ ~ ~ Uni~ S~ t~ di~ of dred~ or fill ~te~al into wa~ of the U~t~ ~ form will be u~ ine ora pm~ nor ~n a ~it ~ ~u~. propo~d a~i~ity must be ~ ~ submittal to the ~ uri~ietlon over ~ isnot ~mplet~ ~ ~il will be returnS. .... Pe~c ~st ~. S~ ~d m~e ~storicat [. ~ TC;~ P. O. ~x 612 ~ ~ t z~,~,!: ~t ~ion, New York 11939 *~e ( 5~ 6 477-00~Q Re~ns~i~ of a ligh~ouse at ~ce to P~c ~ys, ~m of ~old, ~. Ligh~ou~ ~ ~ns~ct~ in 1870 ~d b~ ~ 1963. S~c~e ~tl ~ ~uilt at ~ Yacht ~d Shi~uil~ng ~d ~ ~o ~e orig~l site ~ pla~ ~ r~, ~ist~g f~on. (S~ at~ch~ pl~) Replacement of a historic structure of Community, State and National interest. After replacement, the Coast Guard will re-light and thereby provide m~rking of a natur832.haza~d and improve maritime safety for all vessels entering and leaving Pecc~ic Bays and the harbors of ~reenport, Orient ~nd Dering as well as approaches to Riverhead, Southold, Southampton and the Shinnecock Canal. None ENG FORM 4345. Apr 83 eo,r~~ o;.~ oc~' 77 cs OeSOLE;~ ;p.ooa...c O,~E,-CWO.N New York State Park Cc~mission, Orient, NY. WATEREODY A~NO LOCATION ON WATERBODY WHERE ACTIVITY EXISTS OR I~ PROPOSED Gardiner's Bay and Orient Harbor LOCATION ON LAND WHERE ACTIVITY EXISTS OR IS PROPOEED AOOm=SS: , Rock foundation 650 yards SW of Long Beach Point. Lat N 41° 06' 31" Long W 72° 18' 25" (See attached) STRSET, ROA?, ROUTEOR OTHEROE$CRIPTlVE LOCATIOn4 COUNTY STATE ZIP CODE Southold Town Trustees 4-5-90 NY State DEC 4-5-90 NY State Executive Dept. Southold Town - Building Permit Greenport Village - Building Permit 4-5-90 authorized agent if the statement in Block 3 has been filled ,)ut and sig~ed. 12. Deacrib~ the { dis mete~a~. I~. D~scribe m~thod of d~ad&ed m~tarial containment (i,=e., embankment, bulkhead, DREDGING - OPEN WATEK DISPOSAL N/A For maintenance dredgin~s DA Pemits are generally issued for a 10 year period. Indicate the number of times dred$ing is &nticipet,ed ~ver a 10 year period. Submit required testing data (testtnt criteria will be furnished upon request), Discuss alternatives to open water disposal of dredged material'and why they were rejected, MOORIN~ FACILITIES ~/~ Number of water craft uain~ the present marin~ facility,. ~re p~p~t'facllities avallable~ N~b~r and ~y~ of wa~ c~aft ~tch will utilize ~ proposed ~na or docktn~ facility. ~ill p~pout facilities ~ p~ov~ded for~ ~O FILL N/A I~icatm typm of sc~cturem to be b~itt on th~ proposed lilt. ~ of fitt to ~ us*d (i,e., sand, stone, ~bble, earth, etc). ~d of fttt placmnt, 24. Describe any proposed methods for controllin$-turbidity durin, g fillinS opera~ion. NANY FORN-20I :" ' '"' Feb 78 (b~ck) Par/od of tim roquirud ~ c~leCe t~ p~polod ~rk. ao~h ac~ua~ ~rk ~ and ~nCh ooriod), b ~n~s ~o Info--mien c~rlct~ristl~ of naigh~rh~ (i.d.s highs ~di~ or lo~ density; reaidencial~ c~rc/al~ or industrial). Indus~ial (S~p~d) ad o~ ~y (Ligh~ouse site). 3, Types of adjacent marine structures and approximate distance frc~ the project site. None 1 mile during reconstruction in Village of Greenport. 5; Types of construction equipment ,to be ussd during construction and nunber of each type (i.e., bulldozers, trucks, cranes, eec). Standard ccastruction tools such as saws, hammers, drills etc. and crane to set lighthouse on foundation. Submit repreaen~atlYe photographs, color tf possible, of the project area. wetlands vegetation (such aa cordgraas, raadgress and caeca area. Identif~, photographs a8 indicated ,in box 6. Nuns., 8. Indicate the location of any known historical or archaeological site(s) uithin the project limits. This is a historical site. 9; Submit'copy 'of,any completed environmental s,Cudtes or rep. rte on the proposed project. None [ 10. Discuss alternatives to the proposed project which veru ,lnvestiga~ed lflcludlfl& alternative locations, disposal areas; construction techniques etc. and why~ they were rejected. NAHY FORJ4- 201 Feb 78 ..