Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
DBM COMPANY
FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. BREDESIEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR, HENRY ID. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 To: Dave Emilita From: Re: President Frank Kujawski, Jr. Scoping Meeting for DBM Co. Date: July 8, 1988 Please be advised that the Trustees staked the site to delineate the wetland line and find that there are no wetlands inside of the project premises on the site. FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. ICRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH TELEPHO~rE (516) 765-t892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 June 21, 1988 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, 3r. Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed Major Subdivision - DBM Company 1000-55-6-15.1 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Please be advised that on June 16, 1988 the Board of Town Trustees conducted a field inspection of the above referenced properuy. The Wetland Line was delineated on the parcel during this inspection. The stakes were placed landward of the tree line. For your information, the Conservation Advisory Council was present during this staking. Very truly yours, Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. President Board of Town Trustees FAK: ip cc: D.E.C., Stony Brook, Paul Corrella William D. Moore, Esq. Richard Israel C.A.C. file FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER. III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 June 13, 1988 Mr. Paul Corella New York State D.E.C. Bldg. 40, S.U.N.y Stony Brook, New York 11794 Re: D.B.M. Company - 1000 055-06-15.1 Dear Mr. Corello: Please find enclosed a request by William D. Moore, Attorney on behalf of the D.B.M. Company for a delineation of wetlands on the subject property. Also enclosed is a map and a letter of authorization from the property owner. Will you kindly notify this office after the property has been staked by your department. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter, in the past. as FAK:ip Attachments / cc: Planning Board J William D. Moore, Esq. Richard Israel Very truly yours, Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. President Board of Town Trustees on behalf of DBM Company Board of Trustees - 6/25/88 - Page 13. 6. The file to be amended to reflect "Richard Siriano and Theresa Siriano" in addition to reissuance of the permits. Vote of Board: Ayes: All Resolution adopted. 5. Lawrence Marks requesting to amend permit No. 2074 to replace his float dock with a dock that is 12 sq. ft. larger, Jockey Creek, Southold. Moved by Trustee Kujawski seconded by Trustee Bredemeyer it was RESOLVED to approve the request to amend the permit No. 2074 to replace a float dock with a dock 12 sq. ft. larger in Jockey Creek, Southold. Vote of Board: Ayes: All - Resolution adopted. DETERMINATIONS: In reference to D.B.M. and the Gazza matter: President Kujawski spoke to Mr. John Holzapfel, President, Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council in reference to the Conservation Advisory Council staking out the Wetlands. Mr. Holzapfel advised Mr. Kujawski that he f~lt that this job was no~ a job for the C.A.C. that they felt this job was the Trustees job. Mr. Kujawski advised that it was his feeling that the Trustees should not be staking areas of jurisdiction, and then ac~ing on those applications in that jurisdiction. It is sort of a conflict of interest. You know if you stake it one way, the project doesn't fall in our jurisdiction, if you stake it the other way .... Mr. Holzapfel said he understood. President Kujawski said that, perhaps this could be taken back to the C.A.C., that it was the job of the C.A.C. to advise all Town Agencies. He said that he could remember back in the 70's that mos~ of the C.A.C.'s time was taken up with the Planning Board. Trustee Bredemeyer advised that the we have tried to get together with the C.A.C. on a few inspections. Councilwoman Oliva advised that if there were any parcels that could be recommended to the Open Space Program that the Committee is looking for recommendations for such parcels. Approval of the Wetland Applications: 1. RUSSELL PLANITZER BY J.M.O. CONSULTING - Application No. 600 Moved by Trustee Kujawski seconded by Trustee Krupski it was RESOLVED to recess the Public Hearing in the matter of Russell Planitzer as amended, application submitted by J-M.O. Consulting, WHEREAs the D.E.C. has not commenued on the amended application the hearing will be recessed until next month. Vote of Board: Ayes: All - Resolution adopted. Frank A. ~ujawski, Jr., President HENRY P.S~TH JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III John Bednoski, Jr. ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR~ Vice-President TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 To: J~hn Holzapfel, Chairman Conservation Advisory Council From: Frank A. Kujawski, Jr., President Re: Planning Board referrals Date: April 29, 1988 Please find attache~ maps for two subdivisions as referred from the Planning Board for DBM Company and Joseph Gazza. May we have you~ comments and recommendations regarding these matters? Frank A. Kujawski, Jr., Pres. HENRY P. SMITH JOHN M. BREDEMEYER. III John Bednoski,' Jr. ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTI{OLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold. New York 11971 TO: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner FROM: Town Trustees DATE: April 28, 1988 As per your request, please be advised of the Trustees findings regarding the following applications: FRANKLINVILLE HOMES 1000-125-2-2.2 - Trustees found no evidence of wetlands - no jurisdiction. STYPE BROTHERS AGENCY - Trustees determined they have no jurisdiction. THORTON SMITH - 1000-121-1-1-,p/019 - The Trustees found a pond on the site. There is to be no gradin, on the top of the slope to the pond. - DBM COMPANY - 1000-55-6-15.1 - Trustees are to contact the C.A.C. after it is staked for inspection. COVE BEACH ESTATES 1000-22-3-18.3 - New access appears to be far enough away from the wetlands. JOSEPH GAZZA - 1000-22-3- (19-22) 35-5-1.2 - Trustees will refer this matt~ the C.A.C. for recommendations. JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 SouthOld, New York 11971 FAX (516) 765-1823 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 State Environmental Quality Review Et NDING$ STATEMENT Project Number: coz-2~9 Date: April 25, 1989 Pursuant to Article 8 (Environmental Quality .Review Act - SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617, the Southold Town Board, as lead agency, hereby makes the folio'wing findings: Name of Applicant: D.B.M.' Co. 443 Main Street Greenport, New York 1,1944 (516) 477-2223 Name of Action: Change of Zone application and major ;subdivision for DBM Co. pursuant to Southold Town Alffordable Housing District Lead Agency: $outhold Town Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 [ 516) .765-'1800 SEQRA Status: Unlisted Action Description of Action Proposed .change of zone from "A~RI' Ag ricLllt ural- R esidential to t'AHD" Affordable Housing District and subdivision of land :pursuant to "AHD" Zoning Ordinance Location: BoisSeau Avenue and Tuthill Road, Southold, Suffolk County, New' York Agency Jurisdiction: Lead Agency has; jurisdiction pursuant to Southold Town Code to grant application for change of zone classification Date of Final ElS Fitded: April 13, 1989 Page 2 - D.B.M. Co. Facts and Conclusions in the ElS Relied Upon to Support the Decision: During the review of the proposed change of zone several concerns were raised by the lead agency, its environmental consultant and members of the public. Three areas of primary concern can be identified from the comments made during the review process: I. The capacity of the existing road network to handle the traffic generated from the proposed project and existing traffic conditions was questioned. In~ particular, the adequacy of the traffic study conducted during the winter to assess the summer time traffic conditions was challenged. However, the engineering consultants who performed the traffic study properly factored into.their e~Xtensive study, conversion factors avai~lable to them from the ~Suffolk (3ounty Department of :Public ~Works ~Traffic Engineering Division to determine treffic impacts l~hroughout the year. The Draft Els, and the Final ElS properly and adequately conclude that the existing road network is more t-hah adequate to meet the existing summer time traffic demands as well as those demands created by the proposed action. 2. Protection of the ground water was raisad as an area of concern. Specific mediation measures have been offered to protect the ground water supply. These measures include covenants and restrictions to be imposed upon lots within the proposed subdivision restricting the applicastion of inorganic fertilizers to the property to reduce nit~o~n loading into the ground water, This measure should also protect surface waters. Run off will be collected and returned to the ground water supply by way of catch basins and a drainage area, the design of which must be reviewed and approved by the Southold Town Planning Board during the ~subdivision plat approval process. 3. Protection of surface water. An intermittently wet area is located on a small part of the southeastern portion of the subject property. The project sponsor has offered covenants and restrictions or a scenic easement on those lots abutting this "vernal area intermittent" to prohibit structures and any disturbance of the natural vegetation inthe 75 foot buffer strip to protect this 'area. Storm water run off will be recharged to the ground water by catch basins end the drainage area set aside on the subject property. Run off will not be discharged into surface waters. CERTIFICATION OF FINDIN~3$. TO APPROVF Having considered the Draft and Final ElS, and having considered the proceding written facts and conclusions relied upon go meet the requirements of 6NYCRR 617.9, this StatEment of Findings certifies that: The requirements of 6NYCRR Part 617 have been met; 2. Consistent with the social, economic and other essential considerations from among the reasonable alternatives thereto, the action approved is one which minimizes or avoids adverse environmental effects to the. maximum extent practicable; including the effects disclosed in the environmental 'impact statement; and Page 3 - D.B.M. Co. 3. Consistent with social, economic and other essential considerations, to the maximum extent practicable, adverse environmental effects revealed in the environ- mental impact statement process wlil be minimized or avoided by incorporating as Conditions to the decision those mitigative measures which are identified as practicable. Southold Town Clerk ¥itle of Responsible Official Southold Town Southold Town Board Name of Agency Judith T. Terry Name of Responsible Official April 25, 1989 Date Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 Address of Agency A copy of this Findings Statement Sent to: Commissioner, Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning D.B.M. Co. Southold Town Board Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Planning Board Town Clerk's Bulletin Board Southold Town Trustees~--~ Village of GreenpoFt NYS Legislative Commission on Water Resource Needs of Long Island New York State DepartS{ of Environmen'[al Conservatic~~' Building 40--SUNY. Stony Brook, New York 11794 Thomas C. Jorl~ing Commissioner In response to your request_~: u'~4%'~:~ t recently visited the property located tax mad numper ~oo,-o~-m~-//s-./. I marKeo tne oounoary(ies) of one wetland(s) Dy attaching orange plastic flagging cape ~o tne vegetation. Any clearing, filling, excavation, or construction within 100 feet-of-~he wetland~s.)- will ,require a permit from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Should you apply for sucn a permit, your site nlan mus~ show the flagged wetland boundary(ies) as located by a licensed surveyor. In addition, it must snow the distances between the wetland(s) and any proposed struc%ures, driveways, seppic systems or areas of clearing, filling or excavation. If you have any ouestions, I can be reached az (5t6) 751-7900, exz. 374. 617.21 Appendix E State Environmental Quality Review POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of intent to Prepare a Draft ElS Determination of Significance · SEQR Project Number Date June 9, 1988 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The Southold Town Board , as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant effect on the enwronment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement wil be prepared. NameofAction: Change of Zone Application for D.B.M. Company SEQR Status: Type Unlisted Descri ption of Action: Proposed change of zon~ from "A R", - - Agricultural Residential to "AHD" Affordable Housing District. and subdivision of land pursuant to 'rAHD" zoning district. Location; dnclude street ~ ddress and the name of the municipality/county. A location map of aDDrODriat6 scale ~s aisc recommended.) Located at Boisseau Avenue and Tuthill Road, Southold. See attached location map. SEQR Positive Declaration Page 2 Reasons SuppoHing This Determination: See Parts II and III attached For Further Information: Contact Person: Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Address: Town Hall 53095 Main Road, Southold, Telephone Number: 516/765-1801 A Copy of this Notice Sent to: NY 11971 Commissioner, Department of Environmental Conservation. 50 Wolf qoacl, Albany, New York 1223341001 Appropriate Regional Office of the Department of EnvironmentaIConservation- Stony Brook, N.Y. Office of the Chief 5xecutive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be principally located. Applicant (if any) O~ther involved agencies (if any) 3~ ~ bouthold Town Board Southold Town Building Depantment Southold Town Planning Board Suffolk County Department of Planning Town Clerk's Bulletin Board South. old.~Town Trustees Suffolk County Department of Health Services Village of Greenport · 14~16-2 (2/B7]--7c .; ' ' 617.21 SEQR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full [AF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- Iy. there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have littte or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically exnert in environmental analysn In addition, many who have knowledge in one pamcular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting - the question of-~ignific~ nco The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to a [low introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data. it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identifi.d a~ n_,:,tenticH¥-Ia~&e, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact ~s actuatl~ important DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part I [~ Part 2 F3Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this [AF [Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonabk determined bv the lead agency that: F~ A The prolect will not result in any large and important impact, s] and. therefore, is one which will not have a s~gnihcant ~mpact on the environment, therefore a negative detlaratio; will be'prepared. [3 Although the project cou d hav~-'a significant effect on the environment, there wil not be a significant effect for this unlisted Action because the mitiganon measures described in PART 3 have been requ;red. therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* g~ C The prolect may result in one or more large and important impacts that ma~ have a significant impact on tm. environment, therefore a positive declaration ~'ill be prepared. ' A Condmoned Negat.,'e Declaratton is onl', vahd tot Unlisted Actions Change of Zone for D.B.M. Company Town Board of Town of Southold Franci s__~:_. _M_u r p_h y . ........... Supervisor Smnatur(' ot .°rep~je~ Of d tlerent from. re_,,pnnstbJe Part 2- Responsibility of Lead Agency~ General Information (Read Carefuily) · In completing the form the rewewe~ should,~ be gm~:~f.~y:-~que~st~on:sHa~ve' my responses and determinations been reasonable~' The reviewer i~ not expected~ tO be an expert environmental a~;n~l~,st. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine s~gnificance. Identifying an ~mpact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. · The ~Examples provided are to ass st the rev ewer by show ng types of mpacts and wherever poss b e the thresho d of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The exam pies are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for. an,,, specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate fora Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site. in each locality, wilt vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been-offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question, · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefuUy) a= Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b, Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box [column I or 2} to indicate the potential size of the impact, I~ impact threshold equals or exceeds any examp e prov ded. check column 2. If im pact will occur but threshold is lo~we~' t~han example, check rcoIumn 1 d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change{s) in the project to a small t~ moderate impact, also check the Yes box in colum~ 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1 Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the 3roject site~ [~NO I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater. (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of~aved parking area for 1.000 or more veh~ des. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ~ feet of existing 8round surface. · Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one p~ase or stage · Excavation for mmmg purposes that would remove more than 1.000 tons of natural material (i.e.. rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a samtar¥ landfiJ · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts ~ 2. Will there be an effect t:....,y ut~,que or unusual land forms found on the site? [i.e.. cliffs, dunes, §eologicaJ formations, etc.)~lNO I'-1¥ES · Specific land forms: 6 1 2 3i Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] ~lYes []NoI [] [] i-]Yes J'-I No [] [] I--lYes [-JNo [] [] I'qYes J~No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] [:]Yes []No [] [] [:]Yes [] ,,~ , [] [=]Yes [=]No [] ~"' I ' [] I-]Yes []No.. [] [] []Yes []No IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15.24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) [2[NO DYES Examples that would apply to cotumn 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? r~NO r-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water 9r more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? f-NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Actiou will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) acuon. · Proposed Action requires water su ;)ply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per m~nute ;)umpmg capacity · Construction or ooeration causini~ any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed ~ction will adverse~ affect ground_water. · Liquid effluent will be convev,-d off the site ta'{acilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity Sep~tage Sludge · Proposed Action v, ould use water n excess of 20.000 f_al]ons Der day · Proposed .~.ct~on will like[,,' c=us,, siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water tc u e exte.',~ that there will be an ob¥~ous visual contrast to n~[urai conditions · Proposed'Action will reou;re the storage of petroleum or chemica[ products greater than 1.10C ga [ions · Proposed Action will allow residemial ~ses in areas without water and.'o~ sewer serwces · Proposed Action [ocate~ con,inertial and/or industrial uses ~hich mav · Other ~moacts'__ 6 Wit1 propose(: action alter drainage t/ow or patterns, or ~urface ~'at~r runoff,~ F~NO ~.YLS Ex~'~ples that would apply tc column ~ · Pre b~.~c-d Action would change f:ood ~a;er flows I 2 t 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large- I Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] i--lYes [--INo [] [] (--iyes i-'iNo [] [] []Yes [].No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] i-lYes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] [-'~Yes [-]No [] [] -]Yes [~No [] [] [~]Yes [-]No [] ~ [~Yes []No [] [] ~Yes []No - [] [] [~Yes []No D ~ DYes DNo ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No · Proposed Action may'cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns· · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. e Other impacts: Drai/~aqe plans to be by the Planntn~ Board. IMPACT ON AIR ..... 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? DNO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce1.000 or more vehicle trips in any given houn · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of refuse per hour. · E~;nJssion rate of total contaminants.will exceed 5 lbs per hour or a heat SOurce producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed :action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within ex[sting industrial areas. · Other impacts: Construction impact mitiqatio~ measures are to b~ ~pprn~S hSr P]~n~ ~. IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8 Will Proposed Action affect an% threatened or endangered species? [-]NO Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more soec,es listed on the New York or Federal list. using the site. over or near site or found on the site. · RemovZ' of any portion of a critical or significant ~,ildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year. other than for ~,griculturaI.Durposes · Other impacts' unsubs~antiate~ answer on '~:Par: I. 9 ~,%'ili Proposed Action substantialk affect non-threatened or non-endangered species~ ~]NO ~]YE5 [xarnp]es that would ,~pply to column 2 · Propose(3 Action would substantially interfere with any resident or m,grazorv fish sheHhsh or wddhie soec~es · Proposed Achon requires the removal of more than 10 acres o! maIure fxvresl [over 'i00 ~ears ol age) o~ o~her Iocalk ~mportan/ vegetation IMPACt' ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES ~'~O ~'~'[ S I 2 3' Small to Potentiel Can Impact Be ;Moderate Large Mitiga{ed By '[mpact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes •NO [] [] [:]Yes r"'t NO IX'I [] I-lYes •No [] [] t--lYes •No [] [] []Yes •No [] [] ' r-lyes []No [] [] I-lYes E]No [] [] ~]Ves I--INo [] [] r-lYes •No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] r-lYes ~No [] [] [:~Yes [:]No · Construction actiwty would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or. if located in an ^gricultuta[ District. more than 2.5 acres of agncl, ltural land. · The proposed acuon would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.§ subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches. strip croppins); or create a nee(: for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 Will proposed act,on affect aesthetic resources? E~NO aYES (if necessary, use the Visual FAF Addendum in Section 617.21. Appendix B) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses. or pro~ect components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to cu trent surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural · Proposed land uses. or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic oualities of that resource. · Proiect components that will result in the elimination or significant screemng of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other ~moacts IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12 Will Proposed ^chon ~mpact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? rqNO ]~3YES Examples that would apoiv to column 2 · Proposed Act.i~=~ occurring wholly or partially within Qr substantially contu~uous to any faciht~ or sire listed on the State or National Register of historic peaces · An~ ~mpact to an archaeological site or fosst] bed located within the prolect s~te · Proposed ^croon wdl occur m an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site nventorv · Other ~moacts Requires competen~ authority review. IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION Examples that ~ou!d apply To column 2 ~HO ~YES · Other ~mpacts I 2' 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] I [] [-]Yes [:]No [] [] []Yes J'-I No .... [] [] []Yes [-JNo [] [] [~Yes J'-I N o [] [] [~]Yes [-JNo [] [] [--]Yes []No [] [] r--lYes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] QYes r-INo [] [] QYes [-INo ~ [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes [:]No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? E3NO ~YES Examples that would a ~ply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in maior traffic problems. · Other impacts: Tncreased tra~:fi~. ~r~ ~-urn±ng movements on Bo~ A~r~ve' ;~ACT ON 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ~NO ~YES Examples that would app}y to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any formof energy in the municipality. · Proposed~Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ~ran~i~si~n or supply system to serve more than 50 sing{e or two family residence~ or to Serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16 Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or .vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? i'qNO ~YFS Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1.500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · ProDosed Action will produce operaung no~se exceeding the local ambient noise levels for no~se outside of structures · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts: Construction impact mititqation measures to be approved by P]ann~'g ~n~rA IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? [/NO [3Y£S E~amples that would aD•iv to columr 2 · Proposec Achon may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances 0 e. od. pest~cides chemmals rad~ahon, etc )in the event of accident or uoset conditions, or there may be a throne iow level discharge or emission · Proposed /~ct~on ma~ result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (le toxic poisonous h~ghh,' reactwe rad~oactwe, irritating. mfectious, etc) · StoraEe faclhhes for one million or more Eallons or ]iquified natural gas or other tlammable hquids · Proposed action may result m the excavation or other d~sturbance with,n 2,000 feet of a s~te used for the d~sDosaJ of solid or hazardous · Other Impacts: ,'1 2 3' Sma I to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] ' C-lYes []No ]~1 [] []Yes ~NO ~ [] DYes •No [~[ ' [] DYes l~No [] [] []Yes E3~o '[] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ D DYes •No D ~ ~Yes ~No IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? I-NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the prolect is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The mumcipal budget for capital expena~tures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a chan§e in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire. etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. · P~oposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts' I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large M tigated By Impact Impact 'Project Change [] [] E]Yes []No [] [] []Yes r-lNo [] . [] I-lYes i--INo [] [] J-lyes rlNo [] [] []Yes ' r-INo [] [] []Yes r-lNo [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes i'-INo [] [] I-lYes []No 19 Is there, or is there likely to be. public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? (]NO ~iYES as of 5/31/88 If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Resp"~nsibilit¥ of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instruchons D,scuss th~ following for each ~mnact identified nColL]mn 2 of Part 2: 1 Briefly describe the ~moact 2 Describe (if applicable] how the ~mpact could be mil gated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by proiect changeCs) 2. Based on the information available decide d it is reasonable to conc Jde that this impact is important. To answer the auestion of importance, consider · The probabihtY of the ~mDact occurring · ]-he alu'at,on of the ~mpac[ · Its ,rreversibditv including oermanenti', lOSt resources of ~alue · %~hethet the ~mpac! can or wn~ be controlled · The regional conseqLmnce al the mi)act · Its potential dwergence from Iocat needs and goals · Whether known ODlect~ons to the orolect re]ate to thJs Jmpact {Continue on attachments] 11 Part III D.B.M. Change of Zone ~mpact on Water The proposal may have an impact on groundwater since it requires a source of water that does not have approval to serve the proposed action. .Unless the Village of Greenport grants approval for water hook-up, the proposed action will allow residential uses in an area without water and sewer services. If the Village will require a well on site, its zone of concentration will be~ impacted by half acre tots. However, should public water serve the prop?sed development, no significant impact on groundwater is anticipated. Approval by Suffolk Coun~ty Department of Health Services and by the Village of Greenport of connection to the GreenPo~t W~ter ~uppty System should precede approval of the subdivision by the So~thold Planning Board. The drainage plan must atso~ be approvsd by the Planning Board and Superintendent of Highways. Impact on Aqricultural Land Resources The proposed action will affect agricultural and land resources since it will irreversibly covert more than 10 acres of agricultural land. ~mpact on Transportation There will be a moderate impact to transportation since there will be increased traffic with 55 dwelling units. Imp~t on Enerq¥ The proposed action will require the extension of an energy supply system to serve more than 50 single family residences. Impact on Air During construction, adverse air quality impacts are possible. The use of standard dust control and vehicular emissions control measures will eliminate air quality impacts. ~3st control measures shall be approved by~he Planning Bo~. Noise Impacts During construction, adverse noise impacts are possible. Scheduling construction during normal working hours and buffering existing dwellings~with landscaping and earth berms will mitigate against any significant adverse impacts. Impact on Growth and Character of Community or Neiqhborhood The proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. The proposal will also create a demand for additional community services as well as set an important precedent for future projects. The proposed action would have a small impact on the community's goals, however, it does fit in with the criteria of the adopted affordable housing district. Archaeoloqical Impacts Assessment by a competent authority is required. Rare, Threatened or Endanqered Species Impacts Assessment by a competent authority is required. WILLIAM D. MOORE PATRJC[A ~C. MOORE MOORE & MOORE ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 3 CLAUSE COMMONS MAIN ROAD P.O. BOX 23 MATTITUCK, NEW YORK 11952 {S15) 298-5674 April 24, 1988 Southold Town Trustees Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: DBM Co./ Boisseau Ave. Dear Town Trustees: An application for a major subdivision of property owned by DBM Co. located on Boisseau Avenue has been submitted to the Planning Board. At the request of the Planning Board we hereby request that the Town Trustees and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation conduct a field inspection to determine the boundary of the wetland area located on the subject property. It is our understanding that you will arrange the scheduling of the inspection with the DEC at a time convenient for you. Please keep us notified of the date and time. If you have any questions, or if there is any information which I can provide to you, please do not hesitate To contact me. Very truly yours, WDM:er DocId:042488.4 P Sou~hold, N~Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 94/21/88 Environmental Analysis unit DEC, Building 40, Room 219 SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11794 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision of DBM Company SCTM ~1000-55-6-15.1 Gentlemen: Enclosed please find a completed Long Environmental Assessment Form and a copy of the map of the DBM Company loeated at Boisseau Avenue in Southold. This project is unlisted and an initial determination of nonsignificance has been made. We wish to coordinate this action to confirm our initial determination. May we have your views on this matter. Written comments on this project will be received at this office until May 20, 1988. We shall interpret lack of response to mean there ts no objection by your agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, and our agency will assume the status of Lead agency. Eric: cc: Depar=ment of Health Services Board of Trustees Very truly yours, TT ORLOWSKI,JR. CHAIRMAN TOI~N OF SOUTHOLD SAP EN¥IRO;IMENTA[ ASSESSMENT ~'PART Project information ,OTICE: nTh~s docu~.~ ~ designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significan effect P t.e et,vi c~,~nt. Please cO~}ete the entire Data Sheet Answers to these questions Wi]] bl consid as part.of the a~p)i~ation for approval.and may be subject to fuFther verification and public review. Provid any additional tn¢orma~iON you beheve will be needed to como]et~ PARTS ~ and 3. '- inve)¥ecnewCstudte~,c~j~j~;~"o~i~s~i~ ~)11 be deoendent ~n information currently available and will not so indicate a6d suecifyeach instance qatmon. If informatmon requirin~ such addi'~on~] ~rk iS unavaihble. f(A,~E OF PPOJECT: " : ' ''. '- )~AME ANO DRESS OF OWNER (If Dif?erent) Subdivision 'for- DBM CO-.. .. [Namej ADDmESS AND N~E OF APPLICANT: (Stree~ ~ DBM 2<CO. C/O William D. Moore, Esq. Suite 3 Clause Commons (P.O.) iS:ate) [Zip; BUS, NESS PHONE: '{P~t ituck~ N~tace;ll952 (Zip) .DESCRIPTION OF PqOJECT: (Briefly describe type Of uroject or action) (PLEASE COMPLETE EACH QUESTIOH - Indicate M.A. if not applicable) SITE DESCRIPTION (Phys{ca) setting of overall project, both develoned and unoeve]oeed areas) 1. Genera] character of the ]and: P, enera{ly unifor~ slooe X Z, Pnesent land use: Uroan , Industr(a{ .. . Con~nercial .. , Agriculture , Other 3. Total acreage of uroject area: 37+ acres. Aeoroximate acreage: Presently After Comn]etion Meadow or Brushland ~ acres acres generally uneven and rollinq ur irregu]ar · , Suburban ., Rural ~ , Forest tlater Surface Area Unvegetated (rock. e~rth or fill) Reads. buildin~ s and ether paveo Surfaces Other (indicate tyne) test hole data Presently After C6mplet _ acres ___ac acres ac acres ..._=__ac ...................... ('n ~eet) 6, greatera~pr~xinate percenta?e% of proposed Project site wi :h slopes: 0-10: --.2c--,o,' 19-1~ ~:, IS,* or 7. Is I)ro~ect contiguous to, or contain a buildinn or site listed on th'e National Register of HiStoric Places? Yes _X__.NO 8. What is the depth to the water table? 2~O~eePt~0×* g. Do hunting Or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Yes ~ No . lO. Does project site contain any species of lant r ' · endanoered . .y~. ~ ., . P o animal life that is identifi ~ . iD, according.to- Id?ntify each Species ed as threatened or 11. Are there any unique or ~nusual land forms on the ' formations._ Yes .j Ho. (Describe project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes~'other geological 12.area)S the. _Pr°~eCtyesSite:~ presentlYNo, used by the coranuni ty or neighborhood as an Open space, o~ recreation 13....Does Yesthe present_x NoStte offer or"include scenic views or vistas known to be important to the corn~untty~ 14. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of stream and name of river to which it is tributary 15. Lakes. Ponds, )~etland areas within or contiguous to project area: ; b. Size (in acres) ~AY ~q~O/~jyr,/( 16. What is the dominant land use and zoning classification ~i:hin a 1/4 mile radi~s of ~he project iq. single family__s_residential, R-2) and the scale of dove ooment (e.g. 2 story). ~Agrlcull~ur~±~lqesldent. single family residences on lots less than one acre PROJECT DESCRIPTION I. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor ~'~ Jr acres. b. Project acreage developed: ~ acres initially; ~7 acres ultimately. c. PrOject acreage to remai~ undeveloped (~) U ~JL~ d. Length of project, in miles: (if appropriate) e. If project is an expansion of existing, indicate Percent of -'xpansion proposed: but)ding square foot- age. i developed acreage . f. Ilurr~er Of off-str~et parking spaces existinp : proposed --~ g. Haximum vehicular trios generated per hour~! O (upon ccmpletion of Project) h. tf residential: Number and type of housing units: ,"ne Family Two Family Hu)tiole Family Initial (~ O~ t. If: Orientation · ~ei gnbornooO-C) ty-Regiona 1 Industrial J. -2- Z. How ~uc~ natural material (iJe. rock. earth, etc.) will be removed fro~ the site - tons for construction of proposed roads cubic yards. 3. How many ~cres Of veqetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) ~ill be removed fro~ ~ite -.- acres. 4 Will any mature forest]Jover lO0 years old) or other locally-important reparation be removed by t~ls project) Yes . NO ' $. Are thPKe any plans for re-vegetation to replace ~hat removed during ~onstruction? Yes ~ rio 6. If single phase Project~ Anticipated period of construction ~';-'~months, (including demolition). 7 If ~ulti-ohased orojecc~ ~, Total number of phases anticipated No. b. Anticipated date of con~encement phase I month year (including demolition) c. APp~o×imate completion date final phase month . ~ear. d. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subseouent phases? Yes No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Yes No 9. N~nber of jobs generated during construction/~/,~'after project is.comelete )0. Nu~er of jobs eliminated by this project .0 II. Will project rec. Jire relocation of any projects or facilities? Yes × No. If yes, exo)ain~ 12. 13. 17. 18, 19. single family residential a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved) X Yes No.' b. If yes, indicate ty~pe of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) residential sewaqe c. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will be dischargednone Will surface area of existing lakes, ponds, streams, bays or other surface waterways be increased or decreased by proposal? . Yes ]6 NO. Is project or any cortion of eroject located in the I00 year flood olain) Yes X ,No a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? ~ Yes b. If yes, will an existing solid waste disposal facility be used? Yes X NO C. If yes, give name: : location indiv, system d. :lill any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system 'or into a sanitary landfill? Yes Will prnject use herbicides or pesticides? Yes X No );ill project routinely produce odors (~ro than one hour per day}) Yes X NO Will project produce omerating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? Yes X No Will project result in an increase in energy use? X Yes __No. If yes, indicate type(s) usage 20. 21. 22. If water sugoly ~s From wells Indicate Dumping capacity - gals/minute. typical for single family res, Total ant~cinated water usage per day __oals/day. Zoning: a~ Uhat lS Oomlnant ~on~ng c)assificat~on of site?A__Agricultural/Residential same .3- Yes ~ No City, Town, Village Board City, Town, V~llage Plenning Board City, Town, Zoning Board City, County Health Department Other locaI agencies Other regional agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies C. INFOR~JTIONAL DETAILS ApProval Required (Yes, NO) (Type) s~ater a-greemez~t Submittal Approval (Date) . (Bate) Attach any additional information as may be needed to'c]arif~ your project If there are or may be an), a~verse imoact$ associated with the proposa), please discuss such imoacts and the ~easures which can bo taken to mitigate or avoid~hem. TITLE: Applj. cane REPRESENTING: s e 1 f DATE: -4. EAF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSHEN~ - PART II ~roject Impacts and Their Magnitudn ~ '- ?- -~ ,,,~c Be eva~uated in PART 3 tO determin - · - · .... l ..... State and for most situatio~ .jL:.~u.)e in Col~m~ 2. ~he examples are genera]l¥ apolica~le t~ro ~ c may be mo~e aooropria~j ~. ~'.~J-z~r any spec,ftc project or site other examples and/or lhw~ ~ INSTRUCTIONS (Read Carefully) i. z. FSMALL TO I POTENTIAL 'CAN iHFA'CT MODERATE LARGE REDUCED B IMPACT !~PACT PROJECT CH. ) IMPACT ON LAND NO YES PROJECT'ILL THERE SITE? BE AN EFFECT AS A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL CHAN~E TO E. xamol~s that Woulo A~oly to Column 2 ~ Any cgnstru~:Iio~ on S)oPe~ of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise oer 100 foot of lengc!!), or where ~ne qeneral slooes i~ the project area excee~ 10%. ' Construction o~ Land where the ae~tn to the water tab)e is ]ess than 3 feet. -5- etc.) ..... ?ACT o~ WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY WATER BODYO£SIGNATEo AS ........ PROTECTED? [Under Artic es 15, 24, 25 o~ on~ental Conservatfon Law, E.C.L.) the Envtr~ Examples that Vould Aoply to Column 2 Oredgino more than lOQ cubic yards )f material from cnanne) of a protected stream. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. Other f~Pacts: 4. gILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY NON-PROTECTED EXISTING OR Other fmnacts: 5. ~ILL PROJECT AFFECT SURFACE OR GROUND~JATER nHALtT¥? Ex,moles tmat !-!ou)d Apply ~o Column B © O0 ;~ALL TI? PAT£~ITiAL CAN I~IPACT ~ ES $ 6. :{[LL PROJECT ALTER OD~INA~[ FL3-, P~TTE~NS OK SIIRF~CE !~TER ~0 [~.=o~e t~: Uoul~ ~1~ :oColu~ ~ "(~)(,~) ~P~CT O~ ;. PILL PRO3ECT AFF£~T AIR ODAL~TY? .................~llB ...................................... (DC) of ne~ materials, colors and/or forms tn contrast tott~ Project will result in the e]imination or ma or · I~PACT Ol~ HISTORIC RESOURCES IL ~ILL PROJECT Il!PACT ANY SITE OR STRUCTURE O~ NISTORIC. PRE-U:S~O~IC OR PALEO!~TO~IF.J~L I~!PgPTANCE? ............ to any Cacilitv or site listed on the National Rems~er of OR FUTURE OPEl: SPACES DR RECRE.qTIONAL OPPORTU~IITIES? ...... Examoles that ~lould AOD)¥ to Column'2 O( )3. ~'ILL T"ERE EE~q EFPEC~ TO EXISTIFIG ~RANSPDRTATIDI( S¥STE"S? .............................................. I ODE~ATE °OTE'(TI~L ' LARGE REDUCED YES · ' 14. IHP~CT ON ENERGY UILL PROJECT AFFECT THE COMMUNITIES SOURCES OF FUEL ENERG¥$U~PLy? NO _ Project causing qreater than 5% increase in any form of energy used in municipality. Project requiring the creation or extension of ' ly residences, than 50 si~qle __ Other impacts: IM.~PACT ON Horse 15. WILL T~ERE BE O~JE~TInNABLE ODORs NOISE, GLARE, VIBRATIO. NO or ELECTRICAL DISTURBANCE AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT? N E._xammles that lIould Aooly to Column 2 .... O( -- B?asting within 1,50~ feet of a hospital, Schoo) or other sensitive facility. ~ Odors will occur routinely {more than one hour oer day}. ~ Project wi)) nrodu£e ooerating noise exceedin~ the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. ~ Project will re~ove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. ' ~ Other impacts: in the event of accident or uoset conditions, or there will he a chronic )o~-~ level discharge or emission. Project that ~ill result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" {i.e. toxic, Po~sonous, highly react ye, radioactive, irritating, IS~ALL TO POTENTI.AL L'ODEPJTE LARGE - REeUCED 8)' IMPACT I~ PACT PROJECT C~NG YES' -9- LL ODERATE 17. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE CHAPACTER co..~u~I~y .................. ~ YES | £xe~ole that Would A. oty to Colum. 2 " ' O0 18. IS THERE PUBLIC COMTROVERSY CONCERSING THE PROJECT? E×~mDtes that Would Apply to Column 2 ~ Either govern~e_nt or citizens of adjaceq~ co,,-~uritie$ ~ Objections to the nroject fmom within tDe con~Jnit¥. YES t IF ANY ACTION IR PART Z IS IDE)ITIFIED AS A I POTE~TIAL LARGE I~PACT OR F YOU CANNOT DETEr. MIllE ..~HE MAG ITUDE OF IMPAET~ PROCEED TO ~ DETERHINATION ?OTE;JTt,~L LARGE CAN iMPACF 2E REDUCED BY PROJECT CHA);GE PORTIONS OF EAF COMPLETED FOR THIS PROJECT: PART I PART II . , PART 3 U~on review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1, 2 PREPARE A NEGATIVE DECLARATION Sig~t-~-re-~F Ros;onslote Official ,n Leao m EAF E~VIRONMENTAL ASSESS)(EIiT - PART III E~VALUATIO;~ OF THE IHPOqTA'ICE OF IMPACTS - Part 3 is prepared if one or more impact or effect is considered 'to be potentiallylaroe. - The amOunt of writiho necessary to answer Part 3 ma bp determi ~ - C°mpleting the instructions below ha e r .~ .... . ~L ' n_d ~y ans~rlng the Question: In brief reasonableness of my decisions) v · F,.ucu in ~nlS KeCord sofflclent Information to indicate th~ l~ )~STRUCTIO?~$ ~om~lete th~ following for each impact or effect identified in Column 2 of Part ~: )~ Brief)~ describe the imQaot. ~. Oescrlbe {i~ applicable) how the impact might be mitigated Joct change, or reduced to a )ess than large impact by e pro- 3. Based on the information available~ decide if it is reasonable 3o concludJ'that thcs impact to the minict~altty {city, town or village} in ~hich the projec, is located, is imeortant To answer the question of importance, consider: The ~robability of the impact or effect occurring The duration of the impact or effect _It_~s irreversibility, including permanently lost resources or values ~hether the impact or ~ffect can be controlled -The regional consequence of the impact or effect Its potential divergence from )ocal neees and goals ghether Known objections to the project apply to this impact or effect. IONS I G?)IFICA)ICE OF An action is considered to be significant if: /Qne (or more)im. pact is determined to-both lame Labove, is important. . and its {their} conseouence, based on the review PAPT III STATEHE)(TS (Continue on Attachments, as needed) Southold, N.Y. 11971 (5t6) 765-1988 March 31, 1988 William D. Moore, Esq~ suite 3-Clause Commons Main Road Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Proposed major subdivislon of DBM Company SCTM ~ 1000-55-6-15.1 Dear Mr. Moore: The following information will assist you in resolving the right-of-way situation with the Wheeler's~ The final maps should include the Wheeler's property and should show 40' of road frontage on the proposed road. After the road is constructed and your client is ready to be released from his performance bond, the Wheeler's property deed should be revised as follows: 1. to include the 40' of road frontage 2. to eliminate the right-of-way access over your client's property. These changes should be effective the day the Town Board releases the bond and accepts dedication of Tuthill Road (south). On another note, please stake wetlands line in field for the benefit of the Trustees Board. Also, submit two maps showing wetlands line. Note whether line is a Trustees line or a DEC line. The drainage plan should be revised to eliminate the recharge basin. The use of swaled roads and leaching basins is a preferred method of handling the stormwater runoff. Sincerely, Valerie Sco~ Town Planner cc: Planning Board James, A. Schondebare Robert H. Berntsson Tr~ees Board .JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 5~3'095 Main Road P.O. Box I179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 June 27, 1988 Planner David Emilita will conduct a Scopin~ Session for preparation of a DEIS on DI3M Co. petition for a change of zone at 1_11:00 A.M., Wednesday, J_July 13, 1988 at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York. Town Board ~embers Planner David Emilita Planning Board Town A1torney ~¢4) Newspapers BAZ Radi(~ Station r ste s .fl g.. .ept. ~S3¢~MEa~i°-~t°nybrook & Albany Sou thold Town Cler~ g n/f Roberl Tophn S87°2 '40"E, 200.00' n/f John ~ Henry Srmclk (D 82000 $,F. ® 80000 S.E LGT 53 Y E NNECOTT Subdivu Suffi LCT 52 ion "Map of ,Ik Counl¥ FdE LOT 81000 S.E 22,5 ® 97000 S.E DRIVE Yennecott No 5187 LOT 5O Parkt LOT 49 LOT 48 LOT 47 83000 S.E t55' ® 96000 S.E 2LO 22,0 95000 S.~' 88000 S.E 98000 S.E 200.02 92000 S.E 85000 S.E G '~ ' 114000 S.E 245 120000"~F 85ooo s.~ --- --, k, t 8600(~ S.E NOTES' 4 SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP DtST !OO(} SECT 035 BLOCK~ LOT 15,1 5,TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN HER[ON IS FROM "TOPOGRAPHIC MAP- FIVE EASTERN TOWNS"PREPARED FOR THE SUFF CO DEP'[ OF PUBLIC WORKS. 20 5 RECHARGE BASIN 76000 S.E LOCATION MAP SCALE ' I" : 600' SITE DATA : I.TOTAL AREA =37762 ACRES 2.ZONING uSE DISTRICT: "A" RESIDENTIAL - AGRICULTURAL 3 . TOTAL NO. OF LOTS=I6 4. LENGTH OF ROAD = 1900 L.E STANDARD SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN PREPARED FOR DBM COMPANY AT SOUTHOLD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK SCALE I": yOI~NG E~ YOUNG 400 OSTRANDER AVE, RIVERHEAD,N,Y. ALDEN W, YOUNG, N,Y,S PE /~LS LIC NO 12845 50007