Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-3928 ard Of' $outhold Town Trustees SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK NO. 392.8 DATE: [July. 1.2, 1991 the provisions of Chapter 615 of the Laws of 1893 and Chapter 404 of the L~ws of the 9~2 and fhe Soufhold Tow~ Ordinance en- I~ OF OBSTRUCTIONS TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and the SAND, ~RAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM N WATERS;" and in accordance with Ut[on Of The Board adopted afa meeting held on Z~]y ~.~ .... fi~¢onslderafion of the sum of $ [50.00 paid by ~e~. oE .[~k .~.~ ............................ N. Y. and subject to the llsfed on the reverse side hereof, authorizes and permlfs the following: oE ~est Ro~ a~d ~]eets Neck ~o~, the detailed specifications as presented in WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees here- Seal to be affixed, and these presents to maiority of the ~id Board as of this dat,e. TERMS and CONDITIONS The Pcxm~t:ce . Geor~eanna Fo~arty c/o Cutcho~ue/Ne~v Suffol~r P~r]~ F)~st. :~dMg ~: West Road and Fleets Neck Road, Cutcho~ue N.Y., p~ of ~e co~idera~ou for ~e ~ce of ~e Pe~t d~ ~d~d ~d p~ to ~e fol- lowing: 1. ~ &e s~d B~d of T~s ~d ~e Town of ~u~old ~ ~ed fr~ ~y ~d a~ damages, or O~im; for d~ag~, of ~ ~ing ~y or ~y m a r~t of ~y o~r- afion ~rfo~d p~t to ~s ~ ~d ~e ~ P~ at~ ~h~own ~e, defend ~y ~d ~l m~ ~ ~t~ by ~ pa~, ~d &e ~d Pe~ wi& r~pe~ &ereto, to &e ~mplete ~clmion of ~e ~d of T~e~ of &e Town ~ ~old 2. That ~ Pe~r ~ v~d for a ~ of 24 m~. ~ated me r~uired to complete the work ~volv~, but ~ould dr~c~ w~m~ r~u~t for an e~ension may be rode to ~e ~d at a later date. ~. ~aat ~is Petit shoed be ret~ ~dd~ly, or as l~g to ma~tain the ~m~e or pmje~ involve, ro provide e~d~ to ~yone mncern~ &at au~- orkafion w~ ori~ly obt~. 4. ~at &e work ~volved will be ~bj~ to ~e ~sp~on ~d approv~ of ~e ~d or i~ ~enrs, ~d non-compliance with &e pro,iota of &e oH~m~g appHmdo~ my ~ ~e for rev~adon of this Pe~it by r~olu~on of ~e said B~d. 5. ~at there ~1 be no ~sonable interf~ce ~ halation ~ a r~t of &e w~k herein auflaor~ed. 6. That there shall ~ no ~tefference ~& the right of ~e public to pass ~d rep~ ~ong ~e bea~ be~een Mgh and Iow water m~ks. 7. That ~ furore operations of &e T~wn of ~&old r~e &e rmoval ~d/or ~te~om in the lomtion of ~e work her~ au~o~ or fi, ~ &e o~on of ~e Bo~d of Tm~, work sh~ m~ u~e~onable obsm~on to free navigation, the s~d Pem=ee upon due no~ce, to r~ove or ~ter ~is work or proj~r her~ stated wi&o~ ~mes to ~e To~ of Sou&old. 8. ~ar &e s~d Board will ~ nofifi~ ~ the Perigee ox &e crop!etlon of ~e work au&- or~ed. 9. ~at the Permitt~ wi~ obt~n aH ot~et pe~ ~d com~m .&at my plement~ ro &is pe~t wM~ ~y ~ mbj~ to r~oke u~n f~um ro ob~ s~e. TRUSTEES John M. Bredenaeyer, III, President SUPERVISOR Henry P. Smith, Vice President SCOTF L. HARRIS Albert J. Krupski, John L. Bednoski, Jr. Town Hall lohn B. Tuthill 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 15, 1991 John H. Geideman P.O. Box 416 East Marion, NY 11939 Re: Cutchogue/New Suffolk Park Dist. Dear Mr. Geideman: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during its regular meeting held on July 11, 1991 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, JOHN GEIDEMAN IN BEHALF OF THE CUTCHOGUE/NEW SUFFOLK PARK DISTRICT applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated May 31, 1991 and, WHEREAS said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on July 11, 1991 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT JOHN GEIDEMAN ON BEHALF OF CUTCHOGUE/NEW SUFFOLK PARK DISTRICT BE AND HEREBY IS GRANTED PERMISSION UNDER THE WETLAND ORDINANCE TO: Construct 80' of timber bulkhead with a 15' reEurn. located at corner of West Road and Fleets Neck Road, Cutchogue. This permit will expire two years from the date it is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Two inspections are required and the Trustees are to be notified upon completion of said project. Please return to the Building Department for a determination on the need for any other permits which may be required for this project. Permit will be issued upon payment of the following fees for work to be done below Mean High Water Mark: No fees due. Very truly yours, J/ohn M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB:jt cc: Bldg. Dept. Conservation Advisory Council Richard Lark Mrs. G. Fogarty TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, HI, President SUPERVISOR Henry P. Smith, Vice President SCOTT L. HARRIS Albert I. Krupski,.Jr. John L. Bedmoski, Jr. Town Hall lohnB. Tuthill 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Sonthold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT APPLICATION NO. 110-7-13 NAME: Cutchogue/New Suffolk Park District DATE: June 6, 1991 RESOLVED that pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Trustees, as Lead Agency for the action described below, has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. TYPE OF ACTION: Unlisted, Peconic CEA DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: To construct 80' of timber bulkhead with a 15' return. LOCATION: Tax map No. 1000-110-7-13 REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: 1. An on site inspection has been conducted by the Board of Trustees. 2. An environmental assessment, submitted by the applicant and reviewed and completed by the Board of Trustees, has indicated that no significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. cc: Bldg. Dept., CAC, NYSDEC, Applicant TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, IH, President SUPERVISOR Henry P. Smith, Vice President SCOTt L. HARRIS Albert J. Kmpski, Ir. John L. Bednoski, Ir. Town Hall lohn B. Tuthill 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 11, 1991 John H. Geideman P.O. Box 416 East Marion, NY ~1939 RE: Cutchogue/New Suffolk Park Dist. SCTMa1000-110-7-13 Dear Mr. G~ideman: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during its regular meeting held on June 6, 1991: RESOLVED that the Town Trustees accep~ the above referenced application and waive the application fee as this is a non-profit organization. If you have' any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, tli President, Board of Town Trustees JMB:jt cc: Richard Lark File PLANTINGS inc. Cutch~ue ~4-6755 734-5696 OF ..~ ~ . _ ~___~. Southamp~on 283-7350 June 5, 1991 New York State Department of Environmental Conse~ation Region 2 Headq~rters SUI,~, Building 40, Stony Brook~ New York 12790-2356 RE~ Cutchogue-New Suffolk Park District Permit Request Dear Pe~it Administrator~ I have been asked by the Cutchogue-New Suffolk Park District to review the bluff area of their Pequash Avenue ~yfrcnt property. Over the years, the soil on the bluff and beachfront has suffered considerable erosion. The loss has been so great as to cause the stair~y access supports to be completely exposed, resulting in a weakened st~mcture that the towm has had to reinforce with additional timber., The vegetation is s~rsely scattered over what re. ins of the bluff and offers no protection to what precious little soil remains. There are existing bulkheads to the east and west of the property, They have been hilly effective in maintaining the beachfront and bluff. The vegetation on these bulkheaded areas is successfully established, T~e property belonging to Pequash Club, which is i~ediately adjacent and to the west of the Park property, has been recently granted a pe~it to b~khead by your de~rtment. If the Park District is not g~nted a similar permit, the return from the Pequas~ Club bulkhead will further erode the Park property. It is my recommendation that the Park District propertF be properly bulkheaded across the approximately 100' of beachfront. If this distressed area is to be preserved, it must be restored and reclaimed as soon as possible, The benefit to the residents will be great, allowing for a less severe set of steps from top of bluff to bulkhead to beach. The safety of the elderly and accessibility of the handicapped is of comcern to the Park District. Once the bulkhead is in place~ I further reco~end that the bluff to bulkhead area be planted with appropriate plant material, to be maintained by the Park District. Thank you for your consideration in this hatter, You may contact me at either of the Cutchogue n~bers if you have any questions. Sin~merely, ~ ~'e%e~'C, SteWing PCS/gvj President HENRY SMITH: This is just temporary, Frank FRANK: Yes ALBERT KRUPSKI: Still it would have to go through the Town Board, though. F~ank Kujawski: So we still have to get membership of the Town Board's liabilities, I guess. I don't know where we'll be on that application. After tonight, we'll see. 4. John O'Hagen re: Application for dock on Corey Creek. FRANK KUJAWSKI, JR.: It's a... basically, what he is saying is that he is waiting for Word from the Corey Creek Association and trying to get permission to use this area, so there is nothing much we can do with it until~we get that. Mr. Vail would be next,...maybe just le~ me do 6 & 7 first, Mr. Vail, then you can get the floor. 6. En Consultants re: extension of permit ~432, Elizabeth Yaro. FRANK KUJAWSKI: This permit expired or will expire in December...how the Board feels about it, I don't see any reason why .... HENRY SMITH: I think the reason why she is having a problem, I'm not sure on this, are the permits,or financing or what. I don't know but .... FRANK KUJAWSKI: OK HENRY SMITH: I.k~ow there is a valid reason. Historically, we have given permit extensions in the past. FRANK KUJAWSKI: OK, then a motion would be in order, unless someone sees a problem with this ALBERT KRUPSKI: I~ll make a motion to grant her an extension..6 months.. FRANK KUJAWSKI, Henry will second that.. All in favor... HENRY SMITH: Is that for six months? JOHN BREDEMEYER: Actually, we have to give them one-year extensions. HENRY SMITH: That's what I thought. After a discussion on length of extensions among the Board Members: ALBERT KRUPSKI: I make a motion to rescind my motion. I move to a one-year extension .... try to keep it consistent, at least. FRANK KUJAWSKI: Would someone like to second Albert's motion? HENRY SMITH: I'll second that. ALL IN FAVOR JOH~ BREDEMEYER: I move to grant a one-year extension, as per usual. HENRY SMITH: Second the motion. FRANK KUJAWSKI: All in favor.. All ayes. ~~c~ 7. T~ni DeMee On behalf of Fleet's Neck Property Assn. re: bulkhead at end oftPequaSh the area, and comes Up tonight. I think ~. .nes~Whe~ the hearing!'0pens Vail explained his shore front erosion problem, also spoke about an application years ago for a retaining wall. He said he had lived on the creek for forty years and was familiar with what was happening there. Since the application, he has lost as much as six or seven feet... He asked for some procedure to stop the erosion. He wanted to know what done so he doesn't lose more property without going through a procedure that he had been through before. FRANK KUJAWSKI: OK,... Anybody have any comments? HENRY SMITH: I think we made a suggestion at the time...I know well what Mr. Vail is talking about and what he wanted to do, and apparently, suggestions that we made at that time did not work, so I think, possibly on our next field inspection...I think Mr. Vail should re-apply. ALBERT KRUPSKI: Maybe we can re-activate the existing application. FRANK KUJAWSKI: Does anyone know if that application still exists? Would you be interested, Mr. Vail, in rethinking the retaining wall again if we go down and take a look to see if that's appropriate? MR. VAIL: I'd be very much interested in your coming down and suggesting what I can do without going through all that red tape. FRANK KUJAWSKI: How about October 17 .... i~'s a Tuesday, two weeks from this coming Tuesday? MR. VAIL: What time would that be? FRANK KUJAWSKI: We could put you on top of the list, 1:00 o'clock if you'd like. M~. VAIL: That would be all right. F 'R~d~K KUJAWSKI: OK, I think that's the best we can do, take a look again at what you're talking about and maybe put that application back to work again. IV. ASSESSMENTS: FRANK KUJAWSKI: OK, I guess we have a few moments here, before 7:30 when our hearings begin. We have some assessments .... ALBERT KRUPSKI: You want me to do the first one? FRANK KUJAWSKI: If you would like to, go ahead. ALBERT KRUPSKI: I went down to Cusumano's and looked at it and it doesn't seem like there will be any problem. I am not sure where the channel is there and if it's .... environmentally, it's not going to have any impact. The only impact, possibly, could be the channel, maybe we could...Don, do you know where the channel is there? ...Eugenes's Creek Fishers Island ~to renovate an existing garage apartment and construct.a ~.400 sq. ft. addition on the structure on property located on Middle Farms there several times. I think most of Pond, Fishers Island. We have been the Board has seen this. Is there anyone in the audience to comment-in favor or opposition to this application? JOHN HOLZAPFEL: Frank, I don't know if we said it last month or not, but hay bales there would be a very indicative thing to put between theconstruction and the water. There is a slope there that's fairly dramatic. FRANK KUJAWSKI: Right. JOHN HOLZAPFEL: Just as a generalrprecaution. FALBR~K KUJAWSKI~._OK~ .................. ~ ERT KRUPSKI. ~.Was there any mention o~ the septic system?---' FRANK KUJAWSKI: -I believe it was discussed there and it's upland from that site. Is it not on the other side? JQm~BREDEMEYER: I think last meeting we discussed it where they told us it was going to be on the other side. Toward the road... Toward the road, right, near the driveway. OK, I make a motion to close the hearing. Second All in favor I make a motion to approve with the stipulation of hay bales. Second Next is in the matter of the application of John Geideman of the C~tchogue/New Suffolk Park District to construct an 80' a 10' return on property located at the foot of Pequash Board was at this site and as mentioned earlier at this meeting, a letter from the Fleets Neck Property Owners Association which at this time. I'd like it entered into the record of the reference to the proposed bulkhead of the beach, fronting the ~k District Park adjacent to and west of Pequash Avenue. The Neck Property Owners Association does not feel a bulkhead at this required. In its place, it is recommended that additional placed in a few areas on the bank to help retard any possible Let's hope every effort will be made to keep the Park beach in state as much as possible. This was also disapproved by the of need. They suggested stabilizing the bluff which, I think, ~s the Fleet's Neck Association comments. Is there anyone here to favor of this application? .APFEL: Frank, are they still putting the application forward? Yes..well it hasn't been withdrawn. Mr. Geideman met with anyone speak in opposition to this application? You'll have to name. ,.. Fleet's Neck Property Owners Ass'n. In addition to the that was submitted, and you read, we also feel that the cost of which would be turned over to the Park District, and .lyiwould come back as taxes to the residents to the area, has to ~ed. KUJAWSKI: Right, thank you. Just as a point of information, we zscuss~ng, I think down there the idea of road drains, etc. to on beach, today we submitted four and added the erosion the and Pequash, the end' of Pequash as the fifth project to go...let's see, that went to the DEC, did it not, which proposed kind of a unique drainage system, not as elaborate as occurring in other areas, but a drain system using an asphalt burm at the end of the roadway, funneling it into several large l~eching pools under the roadway. So, I added this as a fifth area. SPEAKER: ...This is down property yo~'re s~eaking of~. FRANK KUJAWSKI: Right..yes, yes..OK JOHN HOLZAPFEL: Frank, can I just ask about that? You wrote to DEC? FRANK KUJAWSKI: No, the Town of Southold has made application. The DEC, I think, has suggested this method. I just saw this today. Maybe you'd like to take a look at it. JOHN HOLZAPFEL: I still don't understand. You said you wrote to DEC about these five places. F~ KUJAWSKI: No, we're sending them on to the DEC as part of an application, o~. JOHN HOLzAP~EL: AS part of a Town application..? FRANK KUJAWSKI: As a Town project, yes. This will be coming up later on under waivers, I think, but in the original application, Pequash wasn't includsd, but it is going to be now. Anyone on the Board have any comments? ALBERT K RUPSKI: You know it might be better if we...because of all the conOerns that have been raised on our two inspections, that we table this application and try get the Fleet's Neck Property Owners Association and Cutchogue/New Suffolk Park District together and try to work something out that .... yod know, it's a community project down there..community should be for it. JOHN BREDEMEYER: Looks like a mistake in the making to me. I just...I have my reservations. HENRY SMITH: I think we ought to just FRANK KUJAWSKI: I was...disapproving it~'~ that it was done with, because I thi~k there is a better way to do it. That method has already been used. ALBERT KRUPSKI: I think we should just let it die. HENRY SMITH: We let too many things hanging when we... this kills it...it's ..they want to know... SPEAKER: Let's go for .a compromise because I didn't think the Board would be looking that strongly against it, but that's fine. JOHN BREDEMEYER: That's not going to serve anybody. I think that well taken it for this one. FRANK KUJAWSKI: OK , unless there are any other comments, I make a motion to close the hearing on this. HENRY SMITH: Second. FRANK KUJAWSKI: All in favor. ALLAYES FRANK KUJAWSKI: I'll make a motion to deny this permit. ALBERT ERU~SKI: Without prejudice, for reasons we should still... F - ~R~ K KUJAWSKI. Well, for reasons suggested by various groups, the CAC, the Fleet's~ Neck Property Owners Association, and the Trustees, that the bluff appears to be fairly stabilized now and a few plantings done appropriately should really stabilize it. HENRY SMITHi: Second. FRANK K~JAW~KI: All in favor. ALL ~YESI JOINT APPLICATION FOR PERMIT .- . ~ ~ ~_ ~,--~.. r.~ ...... ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Lt ~ '" ' ~ ' 516-477-2421 % ~ JOHN H. GEl DEMAN Civil-Industrial-Marine P.O. Box 4115 CUTCHOGUE- NEW SUFFOLK PARK DISTRIOT OUTCHDGUE:, LONG ISLAND, N,Y. 11935 May 21, 1991 BOARD OF TRUSTEES TOWN OP SOUTHOLD MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 Re: Cutchogue - New Suffolk Park District Bulkhead Permit Dear Trustees: Mr. John Geideman is authorized to reactivate our application for bulkheading at Cutchogue - NEW Suffolk Park District beach on Pequash Avenue. We understand the fee is waived because this is a resubmission. Very truly yours, Clerk PROPERTY 0~/~ ;SOCIATION , INC. May 15, 1991 ~~~ ~. John 'III, Presider T~ of S°u~%~id South~d ~ Hall Ma~ R~d ~uthOld, ~ 11971 Re: ~a%%er of Cu%ohague-New Suffolk Park Dis%rio% %0 erect bu[kheading on Peconic Bay ak Pequash Avenue Park The Directors and Trustees of the Fleet's Neck Property ~ners Association are opposed to the installation of butkheading by the above applicant. Our opposition was stated in our letter of September 27, t989, and was supported by your board when the application was denied on October 5, 1989. Our convictions have not altered since then. Experience has shown the negative effects of bulkheading. In fact, the amount of usable beachfront has been greatly d~m~nished since a bulkhead was established East of the applicant's location. We support their efforts to stabtize the area through the use of plantings and replenishment of beachfront by the deposit of dredge material removed from nearby Creeks. Additionally, we would like to express our disappointment over your decision to grant a permit to the Pequash Club to erect a bulkhead adjoining the Park District property. We believe alternate means of protecting tP~ area, as stated above, should have been pursued. ~erel~ ~ BD/~ah TRUSTEES SCOTT L. HARRIS John M. Bredemeyer. III. Presidenl Supervisor Henry P. Smith, Vice President Albert J: Krupski. Jr. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road John L Bednoski. Jr. P.O. Box 1179 John B. Tuthill Southold, New York 11971 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Fax (516. 765-1823 Telephone (516 765-t892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST Enclosed is a permit application and a completed part t of the Environmental Assessment Form. Southold Town Trustees are interested in your ageny's comments in acting as SEQRA Lead Agency for: TAX MAP: ~I~--¢- DESCRPTN: ~_ PERMIT REQUIRED: ~ TOWN WETLAND ( ) OTHER SEQRA CLASSIFICATION: ~<~ Type I ( ) Type II ( ) UNLISTED ( ) CEA Please contact John M. Bredemeyer, III, President, wit~30 days and be advised that the Southold Town Trustees W~_~{~ l~O~k~-) to assume lead agency. SENT TO: DOS ( ) DEC (\~ DOH ( ) PB ( ) ZBA ( ) BAD ( ) Please complete, detach and return this form to e.xpedite processing. Project Name: Location: O~ ~ ~ ~-~j~ ~_~ SCTM: //o - 7-/3 We at ~¥$D~1 ~ objection to South~n I Trustees assumzng Lead Agency. l CoRl~ents/Reasons: New York State Department of Environmental Conse RE: LEAD AGENgY gOORD[NATZON REQUEST T~e purpose of ~h~s Peques~ ~s to de~ePm~ne ue~e~.Ae~e]e 8 (~S~a~e Env~Poe.- men~a] Qua]~t~ Rev~e~ - SEQR) of ~he Env~Ponmen~a] gonsePva~on Law and 6 NYCRR Pa~ 617 the 1. Your agency's ~ntePe~t ~n act~n~ as lead agencs; YouP agency's ~u~sd~c~on ~n ~he action described below; and 3. Issues of concern wh~c~ ~ou~ agency believes should be evaluated. Enclosed ~s a cop~ of the peem~ application and a completed Paet 1 of ~he Env~Ponmenta] Assessment FoPm to ass~s~ Sou ~ Pespond~ng. DEC Project Number: DEC Permits: SEqR Classification: ~Type DEC Contact Person: ~[C Pos~on: DEC nas no objection to your agency or another agency assuming lead agency status for this action, but reserves the right to Commen~ on this action if a positive dotermieation of significance is maoe. [ ] DEC has no objection to your ~agegd~pr another agency assuming lead agency status for thi~i~n~ but we h~.v~ the following concerns regarding this project (see "comments"b~t~ow)· [ ] DEC wishes to assume lead agency s~atus for this action. [ ] The proposed action nas peen iaentified by DEC as occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to a critical environmental area (CEA) that was designated by It is the position of this Department that your agency, if it has a ju~is- diction over the action, should assume the lead agency role based on the existence of the CEA and the fact that the anticipateQ ~mpacts are orimarily of local significance. [ ] Other. (See comments below) Comments (O~tional): Response: Please resoond to this request within 30 days of the date of this letter. If no response is received within 30 days, we will assume that you have no objection to DEC or ano%ner agency assuming the role of lead agency, and have no comments to offer regarding the p~oposea action at this time. If neither your agency nor any other involved agency, including DEC, has indicated a will- ingness to serve as lead agency mithin 30 days of this letter: [ ] We will petition the Commissioner of DEC to designate a lead agency for this action. [ ] We will getition the Commissioner of DEC to designate your agency as lead, presuming you have jurisdiction. Please feel free to contact this office for further information or discussion. S~cerely~ Enclosures cc: (see distribution list) 617.21 Appendix A - S~ State Environmen{ai Quality RevievL_..~_ .~L.~_._..~-- FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSIVIE~ Purpose: The full EAF s designed to he{p applicants and agencms determine, in an ordeHy manner, whether a project .~3L action may he significant. The question of whether an action may be significant Is not always easy to anSwer. Frequent- there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureabJe. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically e~xt3ert in environmental theanaiysiS'questionln additiOn,of significance.many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured I~at the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1= Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data. it assist~ a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 an(] 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impaq:ts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any in: pact in Part 2 is id&tiffed as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evatuate whether or not the ~mpact ia actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFiCANCE--Ty. pe 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part 1 [] Part 2 ' []Part 3 Upon review of the informatio~ recorded on this EAF (Parts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting leadinf°rmaagencyti°n' that:and considering both the magitude and ~mportance of earth impact, it is reasonably determined bv the A. The 0reject will not result in any large and important impact(s) and. therefore, is one which will not have a s~gm~cant mpact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared, [] B. Although the proiect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures'described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED n~gative declaration will be prepared.* C. The project may result in one or more large and important irn 3acts that may have a significant impact on the env~ronmeet, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Cot ditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name o~: Lead Agency Print~q,r"~l-Yt~ame of Responsible Officer m Lead Agency Title ~esf>onslble Olficer ' gency Signature or Preparer Jif different ~tom responsible officer) PART 1--PROJECT INFORr~ATIO~,, ·. Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant eff on the enviro_nment. ,Please complete the entire form· Parts A through E. Answers to these euestions will be conside as part of the app)icatlon for approval and may be subiect to further verification and public review. Provide any addJtic information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently availab[e and will not invc new studies, research or investigation, fnformation requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and spec each instance. NAME OF OWNER (If different) / j BUSINESS ELEPHON~ Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overal project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: I-3Urban Dlndustrial I~Commercial Fq'gesidential [suburban) DRural (non-far: E~Forest ~"l~,gricultu re I~Other 2. Total acreage of project area: acres.~¢~ APPROXIMATE ACREAGE ,/ PRESENTLY AFTER C©MPLETIO,N Meadow or grushianc [Non-agricultural] ~? acres acres Forested ? acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, croo[aod, pasture, etc,) acres _ acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as oer Articles 24. 25 of ECL]- acres acres Water Surface Area acres . acres Unvegetated (Rock earth or fill] acres acres Roads, buildings anc other paved suriaces acres acres Other (Indicate [ype) acres acres 2, What is predominant soil type(s] on prolect site? a. Soil drainage: E2~,q/el[ drained 9/0 of site C~Moderately well drained 95 oi: site ~Poorly drained b. If any a gricuJtura] land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within sod grouo 1 through 4 of the N'~ Land CMssdication System? acres [See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? [~Yes r~No a. What is depth to bedrock? Cio feet] 2 5. 'Approximate perc~-~=e ot proposed proiect site with slopes: [~0-10°,6 , - :; ~150,§~or greater % 6. Is project substantiMiv contiguous to, or contain a building, site. or district, listed on the State or the Natiom Registers of ~istoric Places? OYes 7. IS proiect substantially contiguous to ~ s~te listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks} 8. What is the depth of the water table? {ia feet} 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? [-JYes ~No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the proiect area? EYes ~Z'~No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangere( []Yes 1~No According to Identify "each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological fon'nation~ ~Yes ~No Describe 13. Is the project site oresentlv 6sed by the communitv,,or~ neighhorhoaod a,s an open space or recreation area 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the commumw? [~]Yes ~'No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of F~iver to which it is tnoutarv 16. Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to proiect area: a. Name ' b. Size tin acresj 17. Is the site served bv bxistmg public utilities? [~Yes fi]No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~]~tYes ~No bt If Yes. will improvements be necessary to allow connection~ OYes la. Is the s~te located in an agricultural district certified oursuant to Agricu[ture and Markets Law. Article !S-A; 5ecUon 303 and 304? - [Yes 19 Is tne s~te located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~Yes 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? fi]Yes ~i~No B. Project Description 1. Physical d~mensmns and scale of project lfill in dimensions as appropriate] a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project' sponsor /'" acres. b. Project acreaRe to he developed: / acres inif. iaJJv; / acres u[timatebr,. c. Project acreage to rema,n undeveloped ~ acres. d. Length of project, m miles: / (If appropriate} e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed ' ~ % f. Number of off-street parking spaces ex~stm;~ '~- ; proposed . ,~- g. Maximum vehicular trms generated per hour [upon completion'of ptomctl? h. If residential: Number and type of housing umts: One Famdv Two Family MuII pie Famdv Condominium Initially Ultimately i Dimensions m teetlol largest oroposefJ structure ~ height; width:~Jengm- j. Linear reef or frontage along a public, thoroughfare prolect wdl occupy i~? ~ ft. 3 2. How much/'~:ural material [i.e.. rock. earth etc. J will be removed from the s~e? ~/4-'D'~' tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ~Yes [~No [:]NfA a. If yes, for what intend,.,: pumose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stock ~i ed for reclamation? [:]Yes [:]No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for rec] amation? [:]Yes 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers] will be removed from site? . //' acres. 5. Willl~YesanV matgrel~NofOrest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed., by this project?. 6. f single phase project: Anticipated period of construction /0,/~ months, fincluding demolition), 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated _ / (number). b. Anticioated date of commencement phase I ,h~/~ f~_ montI~ year. (including demolition]. c. Approximate completion date of final phase ... month . ~ / year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent nhases? [Yes 8. Will blasting occur duri~ ~ construction? ~]Yes [~'No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ~ ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project reauire relocation of any projects or facilities? []Yes ' ,'~No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disnosa[ involved? []Yes a If yes, indicate type of waste fsewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will ne discharged 13.Is subsurface liquid waste disposal nvolved~ ~Yes ~No Type 14.Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? {l-lYes Exolair~ 15 Is prolect or anv port,or of ~roiect located in a 100 vear flood p ain~ [Yes ,~'No 16. Wi the proiect generate solid waste? [Yes [~No a. If yes, what is the amoun~ per month tons b. If yes. will an existing solid waste facility be used? []Yes c. If yes, give name ; loca~ion d Will anv wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sam~arv landfill? [Yes ~No e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the prolect involve the disposal of sobd.waste? ,{7lYes ~No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of d SDOSaI? . tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anuciuated site life? /ears. 18. Will ~ro ect use herbicides or pesticides.~ [~Yes /~No 19. Will prolect routinelv produce odors (more than one hour per day)? [UYes ~No 20 Will proiect produce operating no~se exceeding the local ambient noise levels? [Yes ~No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? [~Yes ~No If yes indicate type(s) 22. If wa~er supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity -- . gallons/minute. 23. Tota antic~oated water usage ;er day /'- gallons/day. 24 Does ~roiect involve Local. State or Federal funding? ~Yes ~No If Yes. explain 4 · Req~,jd: '~ Submitt: 25.',Approvals ( Type Date c ty. Town. vi.age City, Town. Village Planning Board ~Yes ~No City. Town Zoning Board OYes ~No City, County Health Department ~Yes ~No Other LocaJ Agencies gYes ~No Other Regional Agencies ~Yes ~No G. Zonin~ and ~lannin~ In~ormalion 1. ~oes proposed action involve a plann ng or zoning decision~ ~Ye* ~o _ If Yes, indicate decision required: ~zoning amending'hr Uzoning variance ~special use permit ~subdivision ~ite plan ~.new]reu~sion of master plan ~resource management plan ~other 2. What is the zoning classification(sial the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? · 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permuted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the propos~ action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted total land use plans? ~Yes 7. What are the predominant land us~s) and zoning classifications within a % mile radius of proposed action? 8. ts the proposed action compatible wRh ad]oining~surrounding land uses within a % mile? ~Yes 9, If the proposed action is the subdivision of land. how many lots are proposed? a. What is the mm~mum lot size proOosed? ~0 Will proposed action require any authorization(s} for the formation of se~er or water d~strictst ~Yes ~. Will the proposed action create a demand for agv community provided services (recreation, educatiom poIic fire protection)? ~Yes ~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to hand e projected demand? ~Yes ~No ~2. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ~Yes a, If yes, s the existing road networ~ adeouare to handle the additional traffic? ~Yes ~No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your proiect, f there are or m~v be any advers impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such m~pacts and the measures whicb you ~ropose to mitigate c avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above ~s True to the best of my knowledge. --, /~....~.~ ~~ . ~ _ , ~ . ~'gnaturS~/~~-- ff-~,~, Title ......... I[ the action ~s in the ~al Area and you are a state agency, complete the Coaslal Assessment Form before proceedin: wilh this as~ssment. 5 ~ Part 2--PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR~ Responsibility of Lead Agency . - General Information [Read Carefully) · In completing* the form me reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations De~ reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large [column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant Any large impact must ~e evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simB asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of. impacts and wherever, possible the threshold magnitude that would trigger a response in colu mn 2. The exam pies are generally applicable t~roughoot the State ar for most situations_ But. for any specific project or site other examples and or lower thresholds may be appropna for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site. in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each questio · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term. short term and cumlative effects, Instructions {Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any irr ~)act b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a q Jestion then check the appropriate box {column '~ or 2) to indicate the potential size of th impact· If impact threshold equals or exceeds any exarr pie provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshoI is lower than example, cheek column 1 d. If reviewer has dou 9t about size of the impact then consider the impact as potenbaliv large and proceed to PART e. If a potentially large impac= checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change{s) in the project to a small to moderat Impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. ^ No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible, Thi mus~ ce explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated By 1 Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project s te? Impact Impac~ Project Change ~¢:~0 E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2. r · Any construction on sic 3es of 15% or greater, [15 foot rise per 100 [] [] []Yes r-]No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%· · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than [] [] 3 feet. ' []Yes [~No · Construction of paved 2arking area for 1,000 or more vehicles· [] [] []Yes [~]No · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed-or generally-within [] [] [~Yes 3 f~et of existing ground surface. []No ·thanC°nstructi°none phasethatorWillstage.C°ntinue for more than 1 year or invol~e more [] [] []Yes []No · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1.000 [] [] E~Yes tons of natural material Ii.e. rock or soil} per '/ear. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. [] [] []Yes []No · Construcnon n a designated floodway. [] [] [~]Yes []No · Other ~mpac:s [] [] E~JYes []No 2 Will mere be an effect t¢. _..~y ua.que or unusual [and fca~]s round nn the ste? ·'.e.. cliffs, dunes, geo og,cal tormat ~ns. etc.),~NO ~.,~' · Specific land forms: [] [] [~Yes []No I ~ 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small [o Potential Can Impact B 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate Large Mitigated [Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of ~e £nvJron~r,~entaJ ConserVa..~n Law, ECL) Impact Impact Project Chan~ Examples that would apply to column 2 ~J~qO []YES · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. [] [] []Yes  Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a [] [] ~]Yes [--]No protected stream. Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. [] [] [] Yes [] No · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. [] [] []Yes []No · Other impacts:' [] [- I-lYes 4. WiI~ proposed action affect any non-protected existing~, r new body of water.~ ~/40 l-lYES Examples that would apply to-column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ~ [] []Yes [--]No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a bodv of water that exceeos 10 acres of surface area. [] [] [~¥es []No · Other impacts: [] [] []Yes []No 5. ~¥ill Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ~O ' []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will_require a discharge permm [] [] []Yes []No · Proposed Action requires use of a source or water that does no~: [] [] []Yes []No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action reouires water supply from wells with greater thar 45 [] [] []Yes []No gallons per mmute pumpmg capacity. ·supplyC°nstructi°nsystem_°r operation causing an', contaminauon of a water [] [] []Yes · Proposed Action will adversely, , affect groundwater... [] m~ []Yes []No · Liquid effluent will be conve/ea off the site to fac~ ltles wn ch present y [] ~] [~Yes []No do not exist or have inadequate capacitg.. · Pronosed Action would use water n excess of 20,0,20 gallons per [] [] day. []Yes [-}No · Proposed Action will liker., c:,use siltation or other discharge into an [] [] []Yes existing body of water to tr:e e×te~ [ treat there wi be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will reqmre the storage of pe~roluum or 'chemical [] [] []Yes- E~No products greater than 1,100 gallons - ·and/orPr°n°SedsewerACti°nserv~ces.Will allow residential uses n areas without water [] [] []Yes [~No~., · Prooosed Action locates comrr.ermal and/or moustna uses which may [] -- -- []Yes []No facdmes. · Other impacts: [] [] []Yes []*No 6 Will prooosera acuon a[ter dram,~ge fh;w or wat2r runott? ~O ~YES E~ampies that would apply [o colump ~ · Proposed Act[on would change flood wamr flows. [] --* [-~,Yes 7 1 2 3,- Small to Potential Can Impact Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change · Proposed Action "nay cause substantial erosion [] [] l-lYes I~No · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing draina§e patterns. [] [] []Yes f--INn · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. [] [] []Yes []No · Other impacts: [] [] - J-'lYes []No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed a~tion affect air quality? CNn I-lYES E×amples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action v, [] induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given [] [] []Yes []No hour. · Proposed Action will result i~ the incineration of more than 1 ton of [] [] []Yes I-INn refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a [] [] OYes []No heat: source Igroducing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · ProDosed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed [] [] []Yes r-INn to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial [] [] []Yes I-'iNn development within ex~stmg industrial areas. · Other impacts: [] . ~ []Yes []No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS Wilt Prooosed Action affect any threatened or enda~n.L~ered snecies? ~;?O E]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ° Reduct~o~ of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal [] [] []Yes []No list. using the s~te, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat [] []- []Yes []No · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ' [] [] []Yes .[]No than for agricultural purposes. · Other Impacts: [] [] []Yes []No 9 Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threat,/ed or non-endangered species? .- _ ~.~40 E~YES Examples that would apply to column 2. · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or [] [] E}Yes []No m.gratory fish. shellfish or wildlife spemes. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 70 acres [] [] []Yes []No or mature forest lover 100 years of agej or otl~er locally moortant: vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land es urces~ ExampJes that would apptv to column 2 ~NO · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access/to agricultural [] [] []Yes []No land lincludes cropland, havf eJds. pasture, wnevard, orchard, etc.) 8 · I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact B Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Chang · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of [] [] I--lYes ['-IN( a§ricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres I--] [] Y-]Yes of agricultural ]and or, if located in an Agricultu'tal District; more - - than 2.5 acres of a.grict~ltural ~and. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural [] [] []Yes ]-']No [and manaaement.systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches. strip cropping); or create a need for such measures {e.g. cause a farm field to drain ~oorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: [] E~, F~Yes I-~Nc IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCESj~ 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? '~2~O ~Y£S (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in ~ection 617.21. Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed rand uses. or project comnonents obviousl,, different from [] I-'1 F-]Yes [--]No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns whether man-made or natural_ · Proposed land uses. or project comnonenrs visible to users of [] [] ' ['-]Yes [--[No aesmetlc resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enlo~ ment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the eliminauon or significant [] [] []Yes [--]No screening of scenic views known to be imoorzant to the area. · Other impacts: [] [] J--]Yes IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site o~r structure o[~x,historic, pre- historic or pa eontological importance;~ ' ~O [Z]YES E~amples that would apply to column 2 : · Pronosed Action occurring wholly or partiall~ within ~r substantially [] [] ~]Yes []No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or N~ationa[ Register of historic places. · Any Jm2act to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the [] [] []Yes. []No pro~ect site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for {~ [] I-'lYes []No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other ~mpacts; [] [] _l'-]yes []No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Pronoseo Action affect the ouantitv or quahtv of ex~stmq or ~uture o,oen spaces or recreauonal opportumties? Examples that would apply to column 2 't~O [Z]YES · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational on~ortunitv. , [] [] ~]Yes [~No · A malor reauction of an open space ~mportant to the commun Iv. [] [~ []Yes []No · Other tmpacts: [] [] []Yes []No 9 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact B 14. ~,¥ill there be an effect [o existing transportation sv~s~J~qs? Moderate Large Mitigated By IqYES Impact Impact Project Chan Examples that would apply to column 2 / Alteration of ~resent patterns of movement of peo~e and/or goods. [] [] []Yes []Nc "Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. [] F- []Yes r-[Nc · Other impacts: [] 'E~ ['-]Yes [~]Nc IMPACT ON ENERGY 15 Will proposec[ action affect the community's sou~'c, Es of fuel or energy suppJ ~ Y' ~JNO E]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 /~" · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% incre&fse in the use of [] [] []Yes []Nc any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy [] [] []Yes F-]No transmiss; un or supply system to serve more than 50 sing{e or two family residences or to serve arr aior commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: F- [] []Yes []No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16 ~/ill there be objectionable odors, no,se, or vibra;gio~ (~s~ a result of the Proposed Acbon~ f-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blastin§ within 1.500 feet of a hospital, school o~/ other sensitive [] [] []Yes I-]No facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per daW. [] [] []Yes [],%'o · Prooosed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local [] [] []Yes []No ambient.noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Prooosed Action will remove natural barriers that would ac[ as a [] [] []Yes E~No noise screen. · Other Impacts: [] [] []Yes []No I}/IPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH- 17 Will Proposed Action ,affect public health and safe?'~i'O~N EYES Examples that would ~pply to column 2 - · - - · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous [] [] []Yes- []No ' substances (i.e. oil. pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc./in the event of ' accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow leve discharge or emission. · Proposed Action ma,'result m the burial of "hazardous wastes" nanv [] [] []Yes []No form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, rad~oactwe. ~rr tat ng infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities ior one mdlion or more ;;allons of iiauified na[ural [] [] []Yes []No gas or other Hammable [iou~ds. · Prooosed acuon may result m the excavation or other disturbance [] F- I-lYes i~N0 w~tt- n 2.000 feet of a s~te usea for the disposal of scud or hazardous · Other impacts: -tm] [] []Yes i-]No 10 I 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact B~ OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 18. Will proposed action affect the character of theexisting commun fy? ~J~,© I~YES Impact Impact Project Chang~ Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent popuIation of the city, town or village in which the [] [~ []Yes I'-lNo project is located is likely to grow by more than 5% i · The mumcipaJ budget for capital expenditures or operating services [] [] - [~Yes I-lNo will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. [] [] r-~Yes []No · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. [] [] []Yes []No · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures [] [] []Yes []No or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development svill create a demand for additional community services [] r-i' I-lYes [-]No (e.g, schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set--an impbrtant precedent for future projects. [] [] []'~es []No · Proposed Action wil create or eliminate employment. [] [] []Yes []No · Other impacts: [] [] []Yes [~]No 19. Is there or is there likely to be. pubiic controver~ related to potentia[ adverse environmental mDacts,~ ~NO [~YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE.t~-~IPORTANCE OF Responsibility of Lead Agency mitigated.Part 3 must be prepared if one or more im~pact{s), ts considered to be potentially large, even if the impact[s) may be Instructions Discuss the following for each m'~act identified in Column 2 of Part 2: I Briefly describe the ~mpact. 2. D~scribe Iii applicable) how the impact could b~- mmgated or r-educed [o a small to moderate impact by project change{s). 3 Cased on the Jnformauon available, decide if it is reasonable [o conclude that this impact ~s important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the ~mpac~ occurring · The durauon of the Impact · Its Irreversibilit¥. incJudin8 permannntb, lost resources of value · Whether me ~mpact can or wdl be controllee · The regional conseouence of the mpact · Its potential divergence from local needs and Roan · Whemer known ob.ecuons to the project relate [o this nno,lct. Continue on attachments) 11 , .~ ~ SEQR .. ApPendix B Stat~ Environmental Quality Review Visua] FAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information rela~ ng to Question 1 1 of Part 2 of the Full FAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0'I/4 ¼-t/2 I/z-3 3-5 5 + · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available [] ~ [] [] [] to the public for the use. enjoyment and appreciation of naturaJ or man-made scenic qualities? · An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public [] [] .... [] [] [] observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made.scenic qualities? · A site or structure listed an the National or State [] [] [] [] [] Registers of H storic Places? · State Parks? [] [- [] [] [] · The State Forest Preserve) [] [] [] [] [] · National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? [] [] [] [] [] · National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding [] -] [] [] [] -natural features) · - National Park Sera, ice lands? [] [] [] [] [- · Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic [] [] [] [] [] or Recreational? · Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such [] [] [] [] [] as'part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? · A governmentally established or designated interstate [] [] [] [] [] or inter-county foot trail, or one formauy proposed for establishment or des gnation? ' · A site. area, lake. reservoir or highway designated as ~ [] E [] [] scenic? · Municipal park. or designated open space? ] [] [] [] [] · County road? [] [] [] [] · State? [] [] [] [ [] · Local road? [] [] [] [] [] 2.seasons~Is th e visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other []Yes []No 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the tirn'e of year during which rrm project will be v sible? []Yes ~No DESCRIPTION OF EXiSTiNG VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4.environment.Fr°m each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding Within '1/4 mile * 1 mite Essentially undeveloped [] [] Forested [] [] Agricultural [] [] Suburban residential [] [] Industrial [] [] Commercial [] [] Urban F- [] River, Lake, Pond [] Cliffs, Overlooks [] [] Designated Open.Space [] [] Flat [] [] Hilly [] [] Mountainous [] [] Other [] [] NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: · V2 mile []Yes []No '1 miles []Yes []No '2 miles '[]Yes ~No "3 miles []Yes []Ho · Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriai~. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7, The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity - - Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work I~ [-- [] [] Involved in recree tional activities [] [] [] [] Routine travel by residents [] [] [] At a residence [] [] [] [] At worksite [] [] [] [] Other [] ~ [-- [] ~0RT ENV ~NSTRUCIIONS:- ~ · (a) In order ~o answer %hb ques%io~s in thi$.shori {h~%{he ~rep~r~r ~ill ~se cur~iy ava£1ob Projec~ a~d ~e' ~keiy i~Pac{s o~' ~he ~ddi¢ional's~udies, r~seetch at . ( ) I~ any ques¢~on has been sign$[i.Ca~t and a eomp[eCed Envi~onmeh~al (c} [~ ~ll quest~o~ have bee~ answered No p~ojee~ ts no{ s$cniFic,nt. s ~. Will u~0sual ia~d ~o~ foUh 3. 'Will ~rojec~ olfer or · 4. Will projec{ hove alpo{enfially o? ........... 5. Will p~ojeC{ significon{iy e{{ec% drainage ~loW on a~jacen~ si{es?~,'~..,~,% ...... 6. Will projec¢ af~ec% 6ny ~hrea~ened or endangered'plan~ er an~mai,'species?..'., 7. Wzll pra3ec% resul~ zm a ma3or ~dverse e~z~a~ on az[ qUalz%y ............. r .... · 8, Willprojee{ have amejor effec% on visual character Of ~he eommuni%y: o~ scenic v~ews or visias known %o be impor%.ah% ~o %he community? ~, Will pro~ea% adversely impac¢ any si%e or s~rgc%ure o[ historic, prehis%oric or ~aleon~91eglcal impor~ance?e~ any si%e : esig~a~ed' ~s a c~i~ieal ehvlron~en~al by a local .~gen¢¥? ............ ~.~.,.¥~.~, ~ 10, Will p~oje~{ hav~.a b~je~ief£f¢% on exi. ii, Wilt proje¢~ resul% in ma)or' traffic 'or cou~e a or e{fec% %o on s¥$%ems? ........ ~' ' ~' 12, regUlorlyjgause oBjec%: ~ dis%l ~ a ~esui% o~the p: ? .... ... ~ .. ~% · .~..~ ..... ~ ec¢ havb Or -sa 14. TELEPHOiV~ I5161 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 AVERAG£ RISE IN TIDE ~ /~ MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE R~MOV~D OR DEPOSITED ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED THAT WOULD PROHIBIT THIS PROJECT? ~ BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF. SOUTHOLD SHORT ENVIRON~EHTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Project Information (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 4, IS proposed action: ~New I--] ' Exoansion ~ Modification/alteration ' 7, Amount of land affecteo: Initially acres Ultimately acres 8. Will roposeo action compJy w~th ex~sting zoning or other existing land use restrictions? ~°Yes [] No If No. describe briefly Residential [] Industrial --L] Commercial [] Agriculture ~] Parkland/open space [] Othe, ~L~J Yel [] No tf yes, list agencyfs) and Detroit/approvals COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) STATE OF NEW YORK ) EE NG DHL swoRN DEPOSES AND SAYS THAT HE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS, AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO~X{E BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING '3NDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT, IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS ARPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZETHE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE, TO ENTER ONTOMY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. Signature of Applicant SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF , 19 NOTARY PUBLIC EXAMINED BY APPROVED DISAPPROVED CONDITIONS (If any) SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN COMPUTATION OF FEES Approved 2/27/85 ~ ( Civil Marine JOHN H. GEIDEMAN Consulting Engineer P.O. Box 416 E. Marion, L. I. (516} 477-2421 New York 11939 To ~,rhom It May Concern, Y ~John H. Geideman to a~ ~s my ~en~ in ap~ing for permits . to construct a on my property at .,~/~ ~ % ~g ~ ~/~g~ -' " Ing~ud[ng: N.Y.S Dept. of U. S. Armor Got. ps of MnF]ne~,rs Town of ~/~ ~/~ .... FRANK A. KUJAWS~,JR., ~es~e~ TELEPHONE- ALBERTJ. KRUPS~,JR.,Vice-~es~e~ JOHN M. BREDEMEYER. III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hal 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 October 5, 1989 John H. Geideman PO Box 416 East Marion, N.Y. 11939 Re: App. No. 7-2-89-110-7-13 Cutchogue/New Suffolk Park District Dear Mr. Geideman: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during their regular meeting held on September 28, 1989 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, John H. Geideman on behalf of Cutchogue/New Suffolk Park District applied to the Southeld Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated July 6, 1989 and, WHEREAS said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on September 28, 1989 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personalty viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that no need for this project has been demonstrated, and that bluff and plantings are stable, and, additional plantings will further reinforce bluff, and that the community is not in favor of this project, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that application of John H. Geideman ON BEHALF OF the Cutchogue/New Suffolk Park District BE AND HEREBY IS DENIED based upon above mentioned reasons. Very truly yours, · /, Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. President Board of Town Trustees FAK:jas cc: CAC, Bldg. Dept, file PROPERTY C ;IATION , CUTCI4OGUE, i~l.Y., 119;~5 Mr. Frank KuJswski, President Smuthcld Town Board of Trustsms Main Road Southsld, NY Omar Mr. Kujawski: With reference to the proposed bulkhead st tbs beach fronting the New Suffolk Park Oistrict park adjacent to and west oX Pmqussh Avenue, the Fleets Neck Propertw Owners Association doss not ~s~l that a bulkhasd at this location is required. In its place, it ~s recommended that additiomal plants bs plmoed in a Esw areas on the bank to help retard anw possible erosion. It is hoped that mverw effort will be made to kemp the park bmach in its natural state as mush as possible. Yours vsrw trulw, Prmsidmnt FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President TELEPHONE ALBERT J. KRUPSKI. JR., Vice-President (516~ 765-1892 JOHN M. BREDEMEYER. III JOHN L. BEDNOSK1, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES ~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, $3095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York [ 1971 July 6, 1989 Mr. John Holzapfel, Chairman Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Holzapfel: Transmitted herewith is application No. 7-2-89-110-7-13 for a Wetland Permit submitted by J.H. Geideman on behali of Stanley J. Salter. Please prepare a written report of findings and recommendations with respect to this application.~ Very truly yours, Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. President Board of Town Trustees FAK: jas cc: Bldg. Dep't. ~ /7 TELEPHONE (516) 765-I892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. $3095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York ! 197t APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE TOWN TRUSTEES, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK, FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT TO THE LAWS, ORDINANCES AND R~GULATIONS GOVERNING THE COASTAL FLOOD PLAINS AND DRAINAGE AREAS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN, PERMITS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 32 OF THE CODE OF THE LOCATION OF PROPERTY FOR REQUESTED PERMIT: T~-~P NO: iO00- CREEK, BAY OR ~OR FRONTING PROPERS: SIZE OF PROPOSED WO~: WIDTH: App. Page 2. YDS. TO BE EXCAVATED: ~ YDS. TO BE FILLED: MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED: DEPTH AT LOW TIDE: AVER. RISE IN TIDE: D STANCE TO NE ST C EL: DISTANCE PROJECT EXTENDS BEYOND SIMILAR PROJECTS IN AREA: INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY: DESCRIBE KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTEDO~PREMISES: HAS ANY PRIOR LICENSE OR PERMIT BEEN ISSUED TO ERECT STRUCTURES, DREDGE, HAS ANY LICENSE OR PERMIT EVER BEEN REVOKED OR SUSPENDED BY A GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY: DESCRIBE FULLY THE ~EHABILITATION OF PROPERTY: DESCRIBE PROPOSED CONDITION OF pROPERTY~FTER WORK IS COMPLETED. INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITE IF NECESSARY: ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED WHICH WOULD PROHIBIT ·HIS PROJECT: WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER IF NOT THE SAME~AS APPLICANT: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) STATE OF NEW YORK ) AND SAYS THAT HE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS, AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATIO~ AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMTT, IF GRANTED-- IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREB~ AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE, TO ENTER ONTO~MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH RES;IEW OF THIS APPLICATION. cant SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS %_%~ DAY OF ~J ~/~ , 19 ~ ~otary Pub)~ State ~ ~y~ ~ NOT~Y PUBLIC / ~o. 62~12~, ~~ T~m ~~31. ~ ~ ~ EXAMINED BY APPROVE~ DISAPPROVED CONDITIONS (If any) SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN COMPUTATION OF FEES Approved 2/27/85 · PROJECT LD. NUMBER 617.21 SEQR Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only =ART I--PROJECT INFORMATION Fro be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 3. PROJF~ LOCATION: .~/ ~' / / 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and ro.a~/{ntersections, prominent landmarks, etc., o~provide/~{~) 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: ~New [] Exoansion [] Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: / 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially acres Ultimately acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? ~Yes ~ No If No, describe briefly Describe: 10. DOES ACTION INVOLYE A PERMIT APPROVAL OR FUNDING. ~OW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, ~-~ ,es No If yes, llst agency(s) and permitlapprova~s 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMtT OR APPROVAL? 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE 3EST OF MY KNOWLEDGE If the action is in the Coastal Area, and 'you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER PART II--ENVIRONM. .'AL ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Agency~ . . A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR. PART 617.127 If yes, coordinate the review process and use the FU~L EC, F. -~ [] [] No i S. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED :OR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 0 NYCRR. PART 617.67 If No, a negative declaration may ~e 5uperseaect Dy another invmvea agency. [] Yes [] N o C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: ~.nswers may be handwritten, if legible) C1. Existing air quality, surface or grounUwater Quality or quenUty, qo]se levels, existing traffic oatterns, solid was[e production or disposal potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? ExptaJn briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or o~ner natural or CUltUral resources: or community or neighborhood characte~ Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant h~bitat$ or threatened or endangered soecies? Explain briefly: C5. Growth. subsequent development or related activities likely [o be induced by the proposed ~ction? Explain briefly. C6. Long term, short term, cJmulative, or other effects not identified in Cl-C57 Exolain briefly. C7 Other impacts (incI~dJng changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. D. lS THERE. OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE. CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL iMPACTS? ~] Yes [] No If Yes. exptain briefly PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be corr gleted' by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above· determine whether it is substantial large, important or otherwise mgnlficant, Each effect should De assessed in connection with izs (a) setting (i,e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c] duration: (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If becessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials, Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that ali 'e]evanf adverse ~mpacts have been identified and adequately addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or s)gnificant adverse impacts which [',lAY occur. Then Droceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. [] Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any s~gnificant adverse environmental impacts AND orovide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: 14-1b;~ .2/87)--7d 617~21 SEQ~ Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is desi_g, ned to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a projec or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent y there are aspe£ts of a project that are subjective or unme,asureab]e. It is also understood that those who determim significance may have I ttt¢ or no forma -knowledge of the env ronment or may be techn ca ~ expert in env ronmenta analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of ~he broader con~:erns affectin~ the question of s~gnifieance. The fu EAF js io,tend~d to provic]e a method whereby applicants and agencies ~an be assutec~ that the determinatio~ proces~ h~a~ ~een ~rderiy, comprehensive in nature, vet flexible to allow introduction of informatio~ tb fit a project or action Full EAF Components: The f.ull EAF is comprised of three 9arts: Part I; PrQvides qbjective data-and'information abou~ a given project and its site. By identifying basic projec~ da~{a: it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 an~ 3. Part 2: Focuses on dentifving the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provide-~ gu:~d~ince as to whether an impact is likely to be considered sma l to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact Can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: [f any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not, the impact is actually ~mpor~ant. D£TERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part ~ F- Part 2 ' []Part .3 Upon review of the informat~o~ recorded on this EAF iParts '1 and 2 and 3 if appropriateL ano any other supporting informatio~ and cons~eermg both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonabl', eetermined by the lead agency that [] A The ~rolec~ w/Ii no~ result m any large and impor~an~ impactis) and. therefore ~s one which will not have a stgmficant moact on the enwronmen~, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. ^lthough the proiec~ could have a ~ignificant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required. therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. ]'h~ ~roject ma,. result in one or n-ore large and important in'~acts that mav have a s~gnificant impact on the enwronment therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. ~ A Conditioned Negative Dec arat~on ~s only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agenc,,, Print or Tvt~e Name or Ret'aon$1DIe Otticer In Lead Agency Title of (~.es~onslt)~e ©liice~ Signature el ResDons[u]e Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparertlf different from responsible otficer) PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOT/CE: This documen[ is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed mav have a significant e on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be con_, c as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addit information you believe will be needed ro complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be deoendent on information currently available and will not new studies, research or invest[gat on. If information reoulrin~ such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and sp each instance. ~ity~L CATJO OF A~TION -- ~ / ~ NAME OF~PLJCANT/~O~O~ ~ ~ -- ' ~ .... ~ ' I BUSINESS TEl EFHONE ADDRESS ~~ ~ ~ CiTY/PO Please Complete Each Quest[on--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Ph'lsicaJ setting of overall project, both deve~ooe~ and undeveloped areas 1. Presen~ land use: ~Urban ~lndustriaJ ~Com m ~rciaJ ~Residentia] [suburban) ~Rura[ (non-fa ~Fores[ ~Agricuiture ~Other ~ ~ 2. Total acreage of project area: acres, APPROXIMATE ACREAGE . ~/~. ~ Meadow or Brushland 'NomagricuJtural) ~ PRESENTLY AFTER CO,MPLETION ForesteQ acres ~ acres Agricultural(Includes orchards, cropland pasture etc,) ~ acres Wetland (Freshwater 3r tidal as oer Articles 24, 25 ot ECL) acres Water Surface ~rea - - acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill/ - _ acres ~ acres Roads buildings and other paved surfaces acre~ -- acres Other (Indicate ~vpe)__ - acr~ ~ acres What ~s predominant so~l type[s) on pro ect s~te~ a Soil dra ~ase: ~eJl drained ~ _ % of ~te ~Moderatelv well ~raine~ - % of si~e ~Pooriv drame~ % of s~te b.Landlf anVclassdicauonaSncuJturaJ ~anesystem¢~S revolved, ~h°Wacres.ma~Y, seeaCres~ NYCRR°~ soil are370).dassified witmn sol~ ~rou~ 1 through 4 of the N Are there bedroc~ outcroppings on project s~te~ ~Yes a. What ~s deotn to ~e~rock~ ~in feetJ 2 5. Approximate percentage of proposed proiec[ site with slopes: [0-'10% % E]10d 5% ¢q'15% or greater % 6. Is prolect substantial[v conti~uous to. or contain a build~ng, s~te, or districL listed on the State or me Nation~ Registers of Historic Piaces~ [Z]Yes 7. Is prol ~ct substantially contiguous to a s~te listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? I~Yes 8. What s the deoth of the water table? (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aauifer? E~Yes ~'~No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities Dresentlv exist in the project area? []Yes 11. Does oroject site contain any species of plant or animal ]~fe that is identified as threatened or endangered -~Yes ~'No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual [and forms on the project site? (i_e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations -1Yes ,~o Describe 13; [s the prolect site present]v used bv the comrp~mty 9r neighborhood as an open space or recreation area ~["Yes rqNo f yes, exp[air 14 Does the present site nc]ude scemc views known to be important to the community? [~Yes /~4o 15 Streams within or contiguous to proiect area: a. Name of Stream and name ~f River to which t ~s tributar~ 16. Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous To proiect area: a. Name b. Size (in acres) 17. Is [ne site served bv~xlstin8 oublic utilities? ~['Yes [~No a f Yes. does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~0/es ~No b) ~ Yes. will improvements be r~cessarv ~o allow concectlop? ~Yes '~No 18. Is the site locatec in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law. Article 25-AA Section 303 and 304? []Yes ~'No 19 Is the s~te ~ocateo in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmenta~ Area designated ~ursuant to Article 8 of [ne ECL. an(] 6 NYCRR 6177 UYes 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? {~Yes B. Project Description 1 Phvsica[ dimensions and scale of project (fiji in dimens 3ns as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or control[ed bv prolect sponsor ~ acres b. Project acreage to be developed: ~ acres initia v: acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to rema ~ undeve~ooed ~ acres. d. Length of project, m miles: ~ [[f aoDrooriate~ e If the oro~ect is an expansion ndJcate percent of expansion proposed ¢-~ %: f Number of otf-street oarking ~paces existing ~ ; proposed ~ g Maximum vehicular trills generated per hour ~ (upon completion of oro ect)? h. ~ res~c~ntia[. Number and wr)e of hOUSing units: One Fan- Ywo Faro ~ MultiPle Faro . Condominium Imtiallv U[t~mat~. v i. Dimensions (m feet of argest Drouosed structure height; ~ '7Ot'length. j. Linear feet or frontage along a oublic thoroughfare prolect w= occuav is~ ~ ft. 3 2. How much natural materia~ (i.e.. rock. earth, etc.] will be removed from the site? /' tons/cubic ~yards 3. Will disturbec areas be reclaimed? []Yes ¢'~'~c~ a. If yes. for what intend._~ purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Wi topsoJ be stockpiled for reclamation? [3Yes c. Will upper subsoi be stockpiled for reclarr ation? [3Yes I~No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees. shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site?.. ~'/ acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this prolect? []Yes ~o . _ . 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction ~'~ ~/~ months, (including demolitionL 7. If multi-phased: a. Tota number of phases anticipated (number}. b. AnticiDated dat~ of commencement phase I /~o~p month o~ year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? []Yes [~No-- 8~ Will blasting occur during construction? I~Yes 9. Number of lobs generated: during construction ~; after oroject ~s com olete _ 10. Number of jobs eliminated bv this project . 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? E~]Yes ~No f yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [Yes a. If yes. indicate type of waste {sewage, industrial, etc.) and amoum b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged __ 13 ts subsurface liquid waste disposal invo ved? [Z]Yes [~No Type. 14 W! surface area of an existing water body ncrease or decrease tv proposal? [3Yes ~No 15 s proiect or any portion ol project located m a 100 year flood ~ ain? ~Yes 16 Will the project generate solid waste? []Yes a. If yes. what is the amount per month tons b f yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? E~Yes ~J'No c. l'f yes, give name : location d. Will an,. wastes nol go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? E~Yes e. If Yes, exolain 17 Will the prolect involve the dis.3osal of solid waste? [~Yes [~No a F yes. what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons month. b If yes. what ~s the anticiuatea site life? ,.ears. 18 Will prolect use herbicides or pesticides? E]Yes ~-'No 19 Will oroiect rouune/v produce odors (more than one hour per day)? I~Yes [~o 20. Wi prolect produce operating noise exceeomg the local ambiem noise evets~ 21 Will prolect result in an increase m energ,, use? ~3Yes [~No I~ ves. ma~ca~e type(s) 22 If wa~er su~nlv~s from wells indicate pumping capacity ~ _gallons/minute 23 Total anticipated wa~er asage per dam ~ gallons/day 24. Does project revolve Local. State or Federal fund ng? [3Yes E~]No If Yes, explain 4 25.' ,.Approvals Required: Submitta : Type Date City, town, Village Planning Board []Yes []No City, ~own Zoning Board []:]Yes E:]No City, Count'/ Health Department ~Yes ~ No Other Local Agencies ~Yes ~No Ot~er Regiongl Agencies ~Ye5 ~No FederaI Agencies ~Yes =No ~ ~mT*~' ~. Zoning ~nd Planning IMorm~lion ~. Does propo~ed action invoJve a plann~n8 or zonin8 deci~ion~ lyes ~o _ If Yes, indicate dec~sion required: ]zonins~amendment ~zon~n8 variance ~special use permit ~subd~vis~on ~site plan ]new revision of master ~]an ~resource manag~ent plan ~other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? ' 3 What is the maxrmum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4 What is the proposed zoning of the site? . ~ 5 What is tne maximum potential develooment of the site if developed as ~ermitted bv the proposed zoning? 6 Is the proposed acmon consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local [and use plans? ~Yes 7 What are the predominant land use(s; and zoning c[assif]cationswithin a ~A mile '~dius of proposeo ~ction? 8 Is the proposed action compatible witF ad]oiningsurround~n~ land uses within a ~fi mile? ~Yes 9 If me proposed action is the subdivision of land. how many lots are proposed? a. What s the minimum lot s~ze proposed? 10 Will proposed action reqmre any authorization(s; for the formation of sewer or water districts? ~Yes 1~ Will the proposed action create a demanc for any communiw provided services (recreation. education, poli fire protection)? ~Yes ~No a[f yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle prolectec demand? ~Yes ~No 12 Will the proposed action result in the generauon of traffic significantly above ~resent levels? ~Yes a f yes, is the existing road network ~oeouate to handle theadditionai traffic? ~Yes ~No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may ne nee~e~ ~o clarifvvour prolect, f mere are or ~av be any adve imoacts associatefl w~t~ your proposal, please m~scuss such imPaCtS and the measures which you propose to mitigate avol~ them. E. Verification certitv thag the information ~rovided ~bove ~s ~rue ~o the best of mv knowledge. Appbc~t/Spon$or Nam~ ---T~--~ Date I~theartionisl heCoas ateagencg, comptete the Coastal ~ssessment Form before with this assessment. Part 2--PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR Responsibility of Lead Agency General information {Read Carefully) · In comoJeting the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations b reasonahle.~ The reviewer ~s not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifvin~ that an impact will be potentially large {column 2) does not mean that Jt Js also necessarily s|gnificar An,,, large ~mpact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance, lder diving an impact in column 2 sim asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of. impacts and whereve[ possible the threshold magnitude that would trigger a response m column 2. The examples are generally applicable triroughout the State for most situations. Eot, for an,,, specific project or site other examples and or ~ower thresholds may be appropr~ for a Potential Large Irt aact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3 · The imnacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will varv. Therefore· the examoles are illustrative have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts anc thresholns to ans~ er each quest · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each quesuon. · In identifying impacts, consider long term. short terrr and cumlative effects. Instruct]ohs {Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any imoact. b. Maybe answers should ce considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the apprc.ar ate box /coLumn 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of t' impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided is lower than example, check column 1. check colum~ 2. If impact will occur out threshc d. If reviewer has doubt abou[ size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART e. If a potentially large ~mpact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change{s) in the prolect roa small to moder~ impact, also check the Yes box in coil mn 3. A No response indicates that such a reeuctlon ~s nor possible. T? must be exolained in Part 3. 11 Pote2ntia, 3 Small to Can Impact B IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large MiUgated By 1 Will the proposed action result n a physical change to me pre act site? Impact Impact Project Chang E~NO ~]YE5 Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on sJ opes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 [] [] []Yes []No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10% · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than [] 3 feet. [] ' ]~Yes []No · Construction of paved parking area for t,000 or more vehicles [] [] []Yes []No · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within [] [] []Yes 3 feet of existing ground surface. []No · Construction that will continue for more than I year or involve more [] [] than one phase or stage. [~Yes []No · Excavation for mmmg purposes that would remove more than 'l.000 [] [] ~Yes []No tons or naturar marerial (La.. rock or soJl~ per .'ear. · Construction or exDansron of a samtarv landfilh [] [] []Yes []No ' Construction m a designated flood~av. [] [] ~Yes []No · Other Impacts ~ ~ [~]Yes []No 2 Will there oe an effect t, ...~y ur~,que or unusual land forms found on the site?[ie..chffs, dunes, geologicai formations etc.)~.NO ~YE$ ' · Soeclfic [ann forms: [] [] []Yes []No 6 Civil Marine JOHN H. GEIDEMAN Consulting ~ngineer P.O. Box 416 £. Marion, L. I. (516) 477-2421 New York 11939 To ~_;nom It May Concern, utnorzze *John H. Geidema'n to se~ ~s my agen~ In app~ng fo~ permits Including~N.Y.S Dop~. of Environmental Consepv~tlon ~U. S. Armv gorps of Engineers ~Town of ~ ~ FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President TELEPHONE ALSERT J KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President ¢516) 765-1892 JOHN M. BREDEMEYER. III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold_ New York 11971 AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES September 28, 1989 7:00 PM Next Trustees Board Meeting: October 19, ~989 at 7:00 PM, Worksession at 6:00 PM Field Inspections: October 17, 1989 at 1:00 PM Call to Order. Pledge of Allegiance I. MONTHLY REPORT: Trustees monthly report for August 1989 II. PUBLIC NOTICES: Public Notices are posted on the Town Clerk's Bulletin Board for review. III. COMMUNICATIONS: 1. U.S.Army Corps of Engineers notice of maintenance dredging of Mattituck Creek planned for the winter of 1989. IV. ASSESSMENTS: 1. Land Use Co. on behalf of Vera Cusumano, 435 Briarwood Lane, Cutchogue, N.Y. to construct 4' x 42' catwalk to existing fuxed dock, construct 3' x 15' ramp and 5' x 30' float. 2. Richard and Patricia Snow, 1585 Long Creek Drive, Southold, N.Y., to' construct 3' x 34' catwalk in 2 sections. ./~ tn Consultants on behalf of A1 Koke, Kimberly Lane, Southold, N.Y., ~aintenance dredge 1200' x 60' channel to depth of 6' below MLW in J~ckey Creek spur at end of Pine Neck Road. Approximately 6500 cubic y~s spoil to be removed and placed on beach for nourishment of island to east, also requests 10 year maintenance dredging permit. 4o En Consultants on behalf of James and Susan Trentalenge, West Road, Cutchogue, N.Y., for permit to construct 85' stone rip rap along shoreline of Wickham Creek to Peconic Bay. V. HEARINGS: THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING IN THE ~ATTER OF THE FOLLOWING APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER THE WETLANDS ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. I HAVE AN AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION FROM THE SUFFOLK TIMES AND AN AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION FROM THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER WATCHMAN. PERTINENT CORRESPONDENCE MAY BE READ PRIOR TO ASKING FOR COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC. 7:30 P.M. - In the matter of the application of En Consultants on behalf of Robert Boger to construct retaining wall, two 5' x 20' floats, maintenance dredge area 10' x 40' to 4' depth. Property located on Willow Point Roads Southold, N.Y. 7:31 P.M. - In the matter of the application of John Geideman on behalf of Crescent Beach Condominium Association to install 8 pilings and add a splash board to dock in piling area. Property located at foot of Maple Lane, Greenport, N.Y. 7:32 P.M. In the matter of the application of En Consultants on behalf of Edward Fergus to construct 4' x 20' fixed dock, 4' x 16' ramp, two 6' x 16' floats. Property located on R.O.W. at end of North Bayview Dr., Southold, N.Y. 7:34 P.M. In the matter of the application of Proper T Services on behalf of Richard A. Hall to construct single family dwelling, walkway 4' x 25' from retaining wall over rocks, 4' x 7' stairs for access to beach. Properuy located on Kimberly Lane, Southold, N.Y. 7:35 P.M. In the mattes of the application of James V. Righter on behalf of Mrs. W.G. Rafferty to renovate existing garage apartment and construct 400 sq. ft. addition on property located on Middle Farms Pond, Fishers Island, N.Y. 7:36 P.M. - In the matter of the application of John Geideman on behalf of Cutchogue/New Suffolk Park District to construct 80' bulkhead with 10' returns on property located at foot of Pequash Ave., Cutchogue, N.Y. 7:37 P.M. In the matter of the application of Proper T Services on behalf of Dr. Francisco Sciotto to construct 4' x 16' walkway, 4' x 16' hinged ramp, two 6' x 20' floating docks at property located on R.O.W. off North Bayview Rd., Southold, N.Y. 7:38 P.M. - In the matter of the application of En Consultants on behalf of Nicholas Theoharides to construct 4' x 70' catwalk, 4' x 16' ramp, 6' x 16' float, dredge navigation area and channel to 3' below mean low water. Property located at 800 Maple Ave., Southold, N.Y. 7:39 P.M. - In the matter of the application of Francis Weisent to register retaining wall and stairs constructed on property located at 1925 Naugles Dr.~ Mattituck, N.Y. 7:40 P.M. - In the matter of the application oi Harbor Marine Construction on behalf of Luis Portal to construct 4' x 20' dock, 4' x 10' ramp and 6' x 18' floating dock to form a T Section. Property located on Jockey Creek Dr., Southold, N.Y. VI. AMENDMENTS: I. Proper T Services on behalf of Ira Wechterman to amend permit number 3690 to reflect construction of 4' x 34' walkway, 4' x 12' ramp and 5~ x 20' floating dock. Property located at 630 Oak Street, Cutchogue, N.Y. 2. En Consultants on behalf of Bernard and Carole Kiernan, North Parish Dr., Southold, N.Y., amendment of permit number 483 to reflect construction of 4' x 60' and 4' x 40' fixed seasonal structure, same dimensions as previously approved project. 3. Petersen's Marina, Naugles Road, Mattituck, N.Y. to amend permit No. 126 to reflect addition of railway and travel lift, alteration of dock configuration. VII: WAIVERS: 1. Gerald Jacobson, 1915 Lake Drive, Southold, N.Y., waiver for construction of 3' x 45' walkway, (existing structure), to Great Pond. 2. Walter Gaipa, Lakeview Terrace, East Marion, N.Y., for waiver to install pool behind bulkhead on Marion Lake. 3. Diamond Scarduzio, for waiver to construct single family dwelling behind bulkhead on Budd's Pond Road, Southold, N.Y. 4. Briarcliff Landscape on behalf of Dr. Frank Sciotto to construct retaining wall over 75' from wetlands. Property located on Goose Creek Lane, Southold, N.Y. VIII.LEAD AGENCY: 1. Peconic Associates on behalf of Narrow River Marina to dredge channel. 2. Robert Searle,Clay Point, Fisher's Island, N.Y., for construction of single family dwelling on property located across from Barlow Pond. 3. Buck Harris, Fishers Island, N.Y. for retaining wall and dock. IX. GRANDFATHER PERMIT: 1. Mrs. Gerald Jacobson, 1915 Lake Drive, Southold, to register existing 6' x 9' floating dock. X. MOORINGS: Approval of October mooring renewals. New Mooring Applications: 1. Michael Connolly~ 715 Liberty Lane, Southold, N.Y.to moor a duck blind in Cedar Beach Creek. 2. Richard F. Greenfield, Cabot's Woods, Peconic, N.Y. to moor 31' sail boat in Gull Pond. WORKSESSION: Jamie Mills, William Mills Co., Main Rd., Greenport, N.Y. Peconic Associates on behalf of Narrow River Marina for discussion of spoil site for dredging project.