HomeMy WebLinkAboutCURRAN, FRANK & SANDRAFRANK A. KUJAWSKI. JR., Presidenf
ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President
.JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III
JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR.
HENRY P. SMITH
TELEPHONE
(516~ 765-1892
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
November 25, 1988
Mr. Robert A. Greene
Alternate Regional Permit Administrator
New York State D.E.C.
Bldg. 40, SUN¥, Room 219
Stony Brook, New York 11794
Re: Frank and Sandra Curran File No. 11-88-111-01-16
Dear Mr. Greene:
Please be advised that this office has received a partial
application in the above referenced matter. Pursuant to the Code
of the Town of Southold, the Board of Town Trustees will not ac=
upon an application until it is deemed complete by the submission
of documentary proof that all other necessary permits and
approvals have been received. The Trustees are concerned about
the adjacent wetland. We would recommend hay bales during
construction and a possible buffer constructed to limit future
activity on wetland.
Please keep this office informed of your progress in
this matter. We wish to be involved in your environmental review
under the S.E.Q.R.A. Legislation.
Feel free to contact this office at (516) 765-1932 should
you have any questions in regard to this matter.
Very truly yours,
Frank h. Kujawski, Jr., Pres.
Board of Town Trustees
FAK: jas
cc: Frank and Sandra Curran
C.A.C.
Board of Appeals
Building Dep ' t.
Army Corps of Engineers
FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President
ALBERT J. KRUPSKI. JR., Vice-President
JOHN M. BREDEMEYER. IH
JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR.
HENRY P. SMITH
BOARD
OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF $OUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
November 9, 1988
TELEPHONE
(516) 765-1692
Mr. John Holzapfel, Chairman
Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council
Southold Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Dear Mr. Holzapfel:
Transmitted herewith is application No.685
Permit sLtbmitted by Environmental East, Inc. for
Sandra Curran.
for a Wetland
Frank and
Please prepare a written report of findings and
recommendations with respect to this application.
Very truly yours,
Frank A. Kujawsk~, Jr.
President
Board of Town Trustees
FAK: hk
Attachment
cc: Bldg. Dep't.
FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President
ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President
JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III
JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR.
HENRY P. SMITH
TELEPHO1V~
(516) 765-1892
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold. New York ! 1971
November 9, 1988
To Whom It May Concern:
Attached hereto is a Short Environmental Assessment Form
submitted by Env£ronmental East, Inc. for Frank and Sandra
Curran in connection with their application for a wetland pezmit
to construct a 15' x 27' pool with a 3' - 5' wide deck around it.
Property located on 780 Haywaters Road, Cutchogue.
Frank A. Kujawsli, Jr.
President
Board of Town Trustees
FAK:hk
posted: November 9, 1988
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Halt, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Sonthold. New York 11971
TE~JEPHONE
{516) 765-1892
APPLICATION IS HERESY MADE TO THE TOWN TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTy, NEW YORK FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT
TO ~ OF THE CODES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTNOLO,
IOENTITY O~ APPL~CANT__F_~a__n~'&gan{,~ Cu~a.._n ........... PMO~E
ADDRESS OF APPLICANT 780 ~_a~sfl~ers Roa~.~tc__ho~.gj NY ll~.
TAX MAP NO. 1000 'lll 01 016
A~ENT
PERMIT REmUESTEO TO__ b__uild ~op~_~_~de_ck
PHONE NO._~,
LOCATION OF PROPERTY
HOME
FOR WHICH PERMIT WANTED__780 ~,~[~t_~_rs~Ro___~_.~_~ .....
ADDRESS OF PERMIT APPLICANT IF
DIFFERENT FROM AFORESAID LOCATION
CREEK, SAy OR HARBOR FRONTINB PROPERTY_~_~_~___aters ~¥_~e .................
SIZE OF PROPOSED WORK__~I__~, 27'~/__Wlt~_.~_~' deck
LENGTH
HEIGHT ABOVE HIGH WATER
YARDS
YARDS
WIDTH Or CASUAL, CREEK OR SAY FRONTING
AVERAGE EISE IN
DISTANCE TO THE NEAREST CHANNEL___~/A___FT.
BELOW LOW WATER ~
To EXCAV^TED__ ..............
TO BE FILLED ...... ~.~ .....
DISTANCE PROJECT EXTENDS BEYOND SIMILAR PROJ~CT~ IN THE AR~A_
IS THIS FOR PRIVATE OR BUSINESS USE?_.~~_ ...............
AREA ZONINg___
MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL
INTENDED USE OF' PROSZRTv_R~side_n_~_~i.~! ..........
DESCRIBE ANY ~tNOWN PRIO~ Op~RATiONS CONBUCTED ON THE P~=~[S~ .......
DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION AND PROPOSED CONDITION OF THE
THE
ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED THAT WOULD
PROHIBIT THIS PROJECT? NO
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hail, $3095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
TELEPHONE
f$16) 765-1892
APPLICATION NO. &~5 DATE OF APPLICATION 0~
.... .....
IDENTITY OF APPLICANT ~k'~ Sand~a Curran PHONE NO
ADDRESS OF APPLICANT 780 ~V~_~ers Ro~d, Cutoh~A9~_~ 1t~5
TAX MAP NO.1000 111 01 016
AGENT Environment ~as~. IRc
516 734-7474
PHONE NO.
PERMIT REQUESTED TO bU~__~__,.,~:~.~.~ deck
LOCATION OF PROPERTY FOR WHICH PERMIT WANTED_~I~ers
HOME ADDRESS OF PERMIT APPLICANT IF DIFFERENT FROM AFORESAID LOCATION
CREEK, BAY OR HARBOR FRONTING PROPERTY HaS, waters Cove
size OF PROPOSED wor~ 15' X 27' R~_~3D_~i~i deck
WIDTH
YARDS TO eE ~ILLED ~
AVaRA~S RISE ~N In~ ~2t
DISTANCE TO THE NEAREST CHANNEL___~_~____FT.
is THiS FOR PRIVATE OR SUSINESS USE?
AREA ZONING ~esfden~lat
IN THE AREA 0
FT.
MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED
INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY R_~_~_~_~___
DESCRIBE ANY KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON THE PREMISE
AND WHETHE~ ANY PRIOR LICENSE OR PERM1T~ ~[~VE BEE~ ISSUED TO ER~ECT
STRUCTURES OR TO DREDGE OR DEPOSIT FIL~ ON SAID ~REMISE$ AND ~NETHE~
DESCRIBE FULL~ THE REHABILITATION AND P~OPOSED CONDITION DF THE
PREMISES AFTER THE WORK IS COMPLETED INCLUDE J~N ADDITIONAL SURVEY
THE PROJECT SITE IF NECESSARY
OF
ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED THAT WOULD
PROHIBIT THIS PROJECT? ~
APPEALS BOARD
MEMBERS'
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER. CHAIRMAN
CHARLES GRiGONIS. JR.
SERGE DOYEN. JR,
JOSEPH H. SAWICKI
JAMES D[NiZIC. JR.
Southold Town Board of Appeals
MAIN ROAD- CJTATE ROAD I~5 .¢BOUTHOLD. L.I.. N.Y. llg?l
TELEPHONE 516 765-1809
ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS
Application of FRANK AND SANDRA CURRAN for a Variance to
the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31, for
construction of a pool with deck and fence enclosure with an
insufficient frontyard setback and excessive lot coverage (over
20 percent), at premises known as 780 Haywaters Road, Cutchogue,
NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-111-01-016.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on
October 6, 1988 in the Matter of the Application of FRANK AND
SANDRA CURRAN under Application No. 3769; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to he heard
were heard and their testimony recorded; and
WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony
and documentation submitted concerning this application; and
WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact:
1. The premises in question is known and referred to as
780 Haywaters Road, in the Hamlet of Cutchogue, Town of
Southold, is identified as part of Lot %45, part of ~27, and Lot
%26, on the Maps of "Peconic Bay Properties" at Fisherman's
Beach, and is more particularly shown on the Suffolk County Tax
Maps as District 1000, Section 111, Block 1, Lot 16.
2. The entire premises has frontage along the north side
of Haywaters Road of 120+- feet in length and varied depths of
128 and 100 feet. The subject premises is presently improved
with a single-family dwelling structure as more particularly
shown on the August 3, 1988 sketch submitted for consideration.
Ap~n~!x C
State :Environmental Q~ality Review
SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
PART or project~ sponsor)
ab
SEQR
New [] Exoanslon
BRIEFLY;
Coas~ruc= a
[] Modification/alteration
X 27' pool Wit~ a 3'-5~ wide ~eck aroun~ it
AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED:
acres Ultimately ~39 acres
WILL PROPOSED ACTION G~PLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND U~ RESTRICTION~? ~
[]Y~, ~o ~o,~ee~ri~ttv requesting variance fo~ ~o~i~g &aw
WHAT iS PRESENT LAND USE Lid VICINITY OF PROJECT'/
~ ResiclenuaJ E/Industrial [] Comme~cial
[] Park/Fo~es;/Open sase§ [] Oiner
4VOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR,FUNDING. NOW OR UL13MATELY FROM ANy QTH.ER ~V~ERNMIEA~TAL AGENCY {~
STATE OR LOC;Al.J?
[-]Yes [~No tf ¥e$, iisi agenpy($) and permit/approvals
11. DOES ANy/~,~F-,GT QF THE ACTION ~VE A CL~RRENTLY VALID PERMIT QR APPROVAL?
[] Yes ~No If yea, list agency name an~ permiuappfo~ai
A RESULT OF PIqOPOSF:~ AL,~rlON WILL F. Xt~T~NG PE~ITIAPPROVAL R~RE MODIFI~TtON?
Yes ~ No
I CERTIFY THAT T~ INF~TION-PROVIDEO AaOV~ IS ~E TO THE BEST OF MY ~QWL~Gg
Pre ~ i de-nS
If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the
Coastal Assessment Form belore proceeding with this assessment
OVER
1
.(Continued on reverse side)
Page 2 - Appeal NO. / ~9
~Matter of FRANK AND~NDRA CURPJ~N
Decision Rendered October 26, 1988
3. The setbacks of the existing dwelling are shown on the
sketched submitted hereunder to be: (a) 12 feet at the
northwesterly corner of the dwelling to the westerly side
property line (along the bulkhead); (b) seven feet, more or
less, from the nearest northerly {rear} property line; (c) 19
feet, more or less, from the easterly side property line at its
closest point; (d) 51+- feet from the front property line
along Haywaters Road.
4. Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule, Column
"A-40" of the Zoning Code requires a minimum frontyard setback
at 35 feet and maximum total lot coverage at 20 percent.
5. Section 100-33 permits the "...average setback of the
existing dwellings within 300 feet of the proposed...on the same
side of the street, same block and same use district .... "
6. The location of the proposed pool and fence enclosure
is within the frontyard area. The setback is requested at 12
feet for the fence from the westerly side property line and at
30 feet from the front property line.
7. The total lot coverage of the existing dwelling is
shown to be 19,080 sq. ft. (inclusive of land underwater), or
15,470 of the upland area. The square footage of the house is
given at 3066 sq. ft., and the coverage for the pool and deck is
given at 833 sq. ft. The percentage of the existing dwelling
coverage is 19%, and the total percentage if this variance is
granted is shown to be within a half percent of 25% (25 -
25-1/2%).
8. It is the position of this Board that in considering
this application, the nonconformities of the lot and limited
buildable area do lend to the nature of the practical
difficulties. The relief requested is the minimal necessary and
the Board agrees the request is not unreasonable under the
circumstances.
Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by
Mr. Grigonis, it was
RESOLVED, to GRANT the relief requested in the Matter of
the Application for FRANK AND SANDRA CURRAN under Appeal
No. 3768 as applied under Appeal No. 3768, SUBJECT TO THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
Page 3 - Appeal No. k,. b9
~Matter of FRANK AND ~DRA CURRAN
Decision Rendered October 26, 1988
1. The total lot coverage shall not exceed the amount
requested (at 25+-%);
2. Screening with three-ft, high evergreens every six feet
be placed and continuously maintained on the outside of the
fence enclosure;
3. The new construction remain open and unroofed (as
applied):
4. There be no lighting which may be adverse;
5. The pool construction not be elevated more than three
feet above grade level (with the exception of minimal step
areas).
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis and
Dinizio. (Members Doyen and Sawicki were absent.) This
resolution was duly adopted.
lk
GERARD P.' GOEPLRINGER ~/'
CHAIRMAN
~'ge 3
Wetland Applicaiton No. 680 of Lew E~s~n t~ construct a one family
dwellin, sanitary system, deck, bluestone driveway, and well,
as shown on submitted site plan was tabled by the Council.
On a motion by Margaret Feeney, seconded by John Tuthill, it was
RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval
of Wetland Application NO. 681 of Philip Salice to add two 6'
x 10' extensions to easterly ends of existing floating docks.
Extensions are needed as esisting water depths are insufficient
to keep boat afloat at all tidal stages.
Bayview Avenue, Mattituck.
Vote of Council: Ayes: All
Motion carried.
On a motion by Heather Tetrault, seconded by John Tuthill, it
RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval
with a stipulation Wetland Application No. 682 of John Stack
~o construct a 20' x 50' in ground swimming pool and 60' x
120' tennis court w~ich will be in ejjxcess of 100' from a
Small, man made ppond to west of subject parcel. The CAC
approves with the stipulation that no land clearing be done
within 75' of the wetlands.
Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue.
Vote of Council: Ayes: All
Motion carried.
.On a motion by Betty Well, seconded by Maragaret Feeney, it was
RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees denial
of the waiver and approval with stipulations of Wetland ApPli-
cation NO. 683 of Dr. Frank Sciotto to construct a pool, decks
was
and gazebo as shown on submitted plans. (Waiver requested-
as all work to be landward of bulkheads.) The CAC recommends
denial of the waiver to allow the public an opportunity to
voice any opposition. The CAC recommends approval of the
application with the stipulation that applicant installs drywells
to contain backwashing and that applicant truck in water to
fill the pool as not to endanger the watertable.
3350 West Creek Avenue, Cutchogue.
Vote of Council: Ayes: All
Motion carried.
On a motion by John Tuthill, seconded by John Holzapfel, it was
RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold T~kw~_~u/s~t~es approval
of Wetland Application NO. 684 of J- ~~construct
one 4' x 30' timber catwalk (elevated 4' over existing marsh),
3' x 16' aluminum ramp, 6' x 20' float and install two 2" x 20'
galvanized pipes as mooring poles.
Private ROW off Main Road, East Marion.
Vote of Council: Ayes: All
Motion carried.
On a.motion by Heather Tetrault, seconded by Bruce Loucka, it was
RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees disapproval
of Wetland Application No. 685 of Frank and Sandra Curr~D
to build a pool and d~ck. The CAC recommends disapproval
because the project is too close to th~ wetlands and ground-
water. Backwash would go into the creek and it is located
within the floodplain.
The N.Y.$. Environmental Quality Review ACt requires submission
of this form, and an enviro-nmentai review will be a~de by ~hls board
before any action im taken.
~NORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
INSTRUCTIONS:
(a) In--order :o answer the questions in this short F~AF At is
that the preparer will use currently available information concerning' the
pro]eot a~d the likely impacts of thm a~t~on. It is not expected that
additional studies, research or other inves=igations will bm underlain.
(b) If any question has been answered Yes the project may be sag-
nifioan= and completed Environmental Assessment Form xs necessary.
(c} If all questions have been answered No it is likely that the
~roje¢= ia ne: significant.
(d) ~nvironmental Assessment
1. Will proaeot resalt i~ a l~rge physical ~hang=
to ~he proaec= site or ~hyeic&lly'alt=r more
than 10 acrms of land? Yes ~ NO
2. Will there be a major change =o any unique or
unusual land form on bh~ site? Yes X N~
3. Will proaecn alter Or have a la~ge effeo~ on
an existing body o~ wa=~r~ Yes X No
4. Will pro3ec~ have a 9ca, tinily. ~%rg~.impaet on
groundwater qmality? - Yes.XNo
5. Will project significantly effect d~ainage flow
on adjaoen= sites? Yes No
6. Will project affect any threatened or endangered
plant or animal species? Yes X NO
7. Will project result in s ma]or adverse effect on
air quality? __..Yes ~ NO
8. Will pro]eot have a major effect on visual char-
acter of the community or scenic views or
known to be i~portant to the community? Yes ,,~
9. Will project adversely impact any site or struct-
Ure of historic, pre-historic, or paleontological
lmpor=anoe or any site designated as a crlcical
environmental area by a local agency? .._.Yes
10, Will project have a maaor effect on existing or
future recreational opportunities? .. Yes ,~ No
11. Will proaect result in major traffic problems or
12. Will project regularly cause objectionable odor~,
noise, glare, vibration, Or electrical disturb-
ance as a result of the project's operation? Yes ~ No
13. Will project have any impact on p~blic health
or safety? , Yes X NO
14. Will projec= affecs the existing co,unity by
directly causing a growth in permanenu
=ion of more than 5 percent over a one-year Yes X No
period or have a maaor negative effect on the ....
charac~-~ Of the oommun/%y or
15. Is there public controversy concerning the
project? Yes ~ No
~reparer's Signature:
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK )
STATE OF NEW YORK )SS:
in completing this application I hereby authorize the Trustees~
agent 6r representatlve to enter~T~y property to inspect the
premises in conjunction~ with r~i~~cation.~~~CANT
SWORN TO EIEFOJRE MS
CLAIRE L. GLEW
Nota~ Public,. State of NewYerk
No. 4879505 ~-~
Commission Expires December 8, 19.2~
COMPUTATION OF FEES
Ap~ roved 2/27/85
~m ~ank Curran
~wl~n$ ~mt, Inc. to ac~ aa ~ aSent ~n aR~l$~
~0~ R~a ~o oo~s~uot a _Pool- dec~, & fe'qce
Ua my ~no~v~y~,~ = 780 Ha~aters Road.~tcho~ue
~d 10~~
U~ A~my Corps of ~n~lr4eer~
· ow~ of Sou~hoid
617.21 ~
Appendix C
State Environmental Quality Review
SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only
PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor)
~ 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PRoJEcI~ NAME
[Eaviromue~t E~st~ Inc. Frank & Sa~dra Currab
I 3. PROJECT LOCATION: ~
, MunJclpaJity Cutcho~ue Co.nty Suffolk
I 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Stz~e~ address ~tn0 road irdersectJons, ~rominent landmark~
780 HaYWaters Road, Fisherman's B each
Nassau Polar, CutchoEue
SEQR
5. I$ PROPOSED ACTION:
[] New [] Exoans,on
6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY:
Cons=ruc~ a 15'
[] Modif [cationlat[eratlon
X 27' ~ool with a 3'-5'
wide deck around it
AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED:
I.itia~ly ,39 acras ultim~te,y
WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND U$~ RESTRICTIONS?
~No IJNo, dsscribebr[eRy requestin~ vaz, iar~ce rot zo~zir~
9. WHAT lB PRESENT LAND USE iN VICINITY OF PROJECT?
~ Residential [] Industrial [] Conlmercial
Describe:
[] Park/Forest/Open space [] Other
10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER G(~VERNMENTA4 AGENCY (FF~DERAL,
STATE OR LOCAL)?
[] Yes [~No If yes, list agency(s) and permiUapprovals
DOES ANY ~CT OF THE ACTION hAVE A CURRENTLY VAL!D PERMIT OR APPROVAL?
[] Yes 'L.~'No If yes, list agency name and permit/approval
12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMITIAPPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION?
[] Yes ~] NO
I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORbIATION PROVIDED ADOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
If the action is in the Coastal Area. and you are a state agency, comp ere the
Coastal Assessment Form belore proceeding with this assessment
OVER
1
(Continued on
reverse side)
The N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act requires submission
of this form, and an ~nviro'nmental review will b~ made by this board
before any action is taken.
SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
INSTRUCTIONS:
(a) In order no answer the questions in this short EAF it zs assumed
that the preparer will use currently available information concerning
project and the likely impacts of the action. It is not expected tha~
addin~onal studies, research or other investigations will be undertaken.
(b) If any question has been answered Yes the project may be sig-
nificant and completed Environmental Assessment Form zs necessary.
(c) If all questions have been answered No it is likely that the
project ia not significant.
(d) Environmental Assessment
1. Will project result i~ a large physical change
to the project site or p~y'sically'alter more
than 10 acres of land? Yes X NO
2. Will there be a major change to any un!que or
u~asual land form on the si~e? Yes X No
3. Will project alter or have a la~ge effect on
an existing body of water? Yes ~ NO
4. Will project have a potentially, large, impact on
groundwater quality? Yes X No
5. Will project significantly effect drainage flow
on adjacen~ sites? Yes ~ No
6. Will project affect any threatened or endangered
plant or animal species? Yes ~ No
7. Will project result in a ma]or adverse effect on
air quality? Yes ~ No
8. Will project have a major effect on visual char-
acter of the community or scenic views or vistas
known to be importan~ to the community? ~¥es X No
9. Will project adversely impact any site or struct-
ure of historic, pre-historic, or paleontologiuaI
importance or any sit~ designated as a critical
env~rcemental area by a local agency? ____Yes ~ No
10. Will project have a major effect on existing or
future recreational opportunities? ___Yes X NO
11. Will project result in major traffic problems or
cause a major effect to existing transportation
systems? .., Yes _~ No
12. Will project regularly cause objectionable odors,
noise, glare, vibration, or electrical disturb-
ance as a result of the prosect.s operation? ~Yes ~ NO
13. Will project have any impact on public health
14. Will project affect the existing community by
directly causing a growth in permanent popula-
tion o~ more than 5 percent over a one-year Yes X No
period or have a major negative effect on the -
charact~of the community or nelghborhood?
15. Is there public controversy concerning the .
project? Yes ~ No
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK )
STATE OF NEW YORK )SS:
In completing this application I hereby authorize the Trusteesj
agent or representative to enter ~y~~~nproper~y to inspect the
Commfssion ExpiTes Oecember ~, 19.2.~
EXAMINED
APPROVED "WETLANDS" PERMIT (CHAPTER 97)
APPROVED "BOAT,DOCKS, WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER
CONDITIONS, IF ANY
EXAMINING BODY
SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN
COMPUTATION OF FEES
Approved 2/27/85