Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-3810Board. Of $outhold Town Trustees SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK PERMIT NO. 3810 DATE: ... Mar ch... 23.....1990 ISSUED TO ........ ~Ekomas .Coffin... .................................................................... Pursuant to the provi.sions of Chapter 615 of +he Laws of ~' +he S+afe of New yor~, 1.8.93 ~.cJ Chap+er 404 of ~e Laws of ' he State of New York 1~52i and the Southold Town Ordinance en- titled "REGULATING AND THE PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and the REMOVAL OF SAND GRAVEL O,R,. OTH.ER MATERIALS .F. ROM LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS; and in accordance with the Resolution of The Board adopted at a meeting held on _Mazch...Z2.. t9...90.., and in consideration of the sum of $ ................. paid by of ............................................................................ N. Y. and subject fo the Terms and Conditions listed on the reverse side hereof. of Sou+hold Town Trustees authorizes and permits the following: Install 4'X40' floating dock along an existing timber bulkhea( Maintenance dredge a lO'X60' area of dredged canal to 4' at MLW. Approximately 90 c.y. of spoil to be trucked to an upland disposal site. all'in accordance with the detailed specifications as presented in the originating application. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The sald Board of Trustees ~re- by causes, ifs Corporate. S.e. al to be affixed, and these presents be subscr,bed by a malonty of Board as of thls dat.e. TERMS and C, ONDITIONS The Permi~tee Thom~ C. nffin residing at 305 Gull Pond Lane. Graanpowr N. Y, as parc of the consideration for the is~,,-ce of the Permit do~ understand and px~xibe to the fol- lowing: 1. Th~ the said Board of Tmsteas and the Town of Southold are released from any and aH damages, or daims fo~ damages, of ~ arising directly or indirectly as a result of any oper- ation performed pursuant m this permit, and the said Permit-tee will, at his o~ her own expeme, defend any and all such suits initiated by third partier, and the said Permittee assumes full liability with respec~ thereto, to the complete exclusion of the Board of Trustees of the Tow~ of Southold 2. That this Permit i~ valid for a period of 24 mo~. which is comidered co be the estimated time required to complete the work involved, but should dro~m~unce~ warrant, request for an extension may be made to the Board at a later date 5. That this Permit should be retained indefinitely, or as long as the said Permittee wi~hes to maintain the structure or project involved, to provide evidence to anyone concerned that auth- orizarion was originally obtained. 4. That the work involved will be subjec~ to the inspection and approval of the Board or ks agents, and non-compliance with the provisions of the originating application, may be cause for revocation of this Permit by re~olution of the said Board. 5. That there will be no unreasonable interference with navigation as a result of the work herein authorized. 6, That there shall be no interference with the right of the public to pass and repass along the beach between high and low water marks. 7. That if future operations of the Town of Southold require the removal and/or aitaration~ in the location of the work herelu authorized, or if, in the opinlan of the Board of Tea~ees, the work shall cause unreasonable obstrucuon to free navigation, the said Permittee will be required, upon due notice, to remove or alter this work or project herein stated without expenses to the Town of Southold. 8. That the said Board will be notified by the Permittee or the completion of the work anth- nrlzed. 9. That the Permittee will obtain all other permks and consents tt~t may I~ required plemental to this permit which may be subject to revoke upon failure to obr*;- same. TRUSTEES ' '~'~ Jolm M. Bredemeyer, 11I, President Albert j. KrupsM, Jr.. Vice President Henry P. Smith John B. Tuthill W'fllhm G. Albertson Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOIJ~fHOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 October 23~ 1992 James E. Fitzgerald, Jr. Proper-T Permit Services P.O. Box 617 Cutchogee NY 11935 Re: Thomas Coffin SC~91000-35-4-28.25 Dear Mr. Fitzgerald: The following action wastaken by. the' Board of Trustees at their regular meeting of October 22~ 1992: Resolved that the Southold Town Board of Trustees grant an amendment to waiver granted at the 3/26/92 Trustees meeting, to make the deck 15~ X 67' with a hot tub~ as shown on the enclosed *'project plan" dated as revised 7/2/92. If you have any questions please contact our office° Very truly yours, · John M. Br~demeyer, II! President~ Board of Trustees JMB:djh cc. Building Dept. Proper-T Permit Services POST OFFICE BOX 617. CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 734-5800 October 14, 1992 President Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Request for Waiver Amendment Thomas Coffin, SCTM $1000-35-4-28.25 Dear Sir: The ZBA has approved a variance in this case which permits a larger "envelope" for the deck than was applied for in the waiver issued by the Trustees, and includes provision for a hot tub within the deck area. A copy of the ZBA determination is enclosed. Please amend the waiver granted at the 3/26/92 Trustee meeting to provide for a deck of up to 15' x 67' with a hot tub, as shown on the enclosed "Project Plan" dated Rev 7/2/92. If you need anything else, please call. Enclosures: Project Plan, Rev ZBA letter re 7/2/92 $4110, 8/3/92 a subsidiary of THE PECONIC EASTERN CORPORATION ?ROSECT PLAN APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen~ Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 August 3, 1992 Mr. James E. Fitzgerald, Proper-T Permit Services P.O. Box 617 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Jr. Re: Appl. No. 4110 - Thomas E. Coffin (Deck Variance) Dear Mr. Fitzgerald: Please find attached a copy of the Board's determination rendered in the above matter. Copies of this determination have also been furnished this date to the Building Department for their permanent records and to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. Very truly yours, Linda Kowalski Enclosure Copies of Decision to: Southold Town Building Department Suffolk County Department of Planning Mr. Thomas E. Coffin ~PPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen. Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ACTION OF THE BOARD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 Appl. No. 4110. Upon application of THOMAS E. COFFIN. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4B for permission to construct addition within 75 feet of the existing bulkhead. This parcel contains a total lot area of 19,985 sq. ft. and is located in the R-40 Zone District. Location of Property: 305 Gull Pond Lane, Greenport, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-35-4-5 (now 28.25); also known as Lot 10, Map of Fordham Acres, Section One. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on June 4, 1992, and at said hearing, all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; WHEREAS, Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, the surrounding areas; and and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. By this application, appellant seeks a variance under Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4B for a 15' deep by 67' wide open deck with hot tub as shown on the August 18, 1976 survey map prepared by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C., amended May 11, 1992, to be located at the rear (easterly) section of the existing single-family dwelling. Inclusive of all step areas, the setback of the addition is proposed to be 43 feet from the inside of the existing bulkhead. 2. The subject premises in question is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 35, Block 4, Lot 28.25 and is identified on the Map of Fordh~m Acres, Section One, as Lot No. 10. This property has a frontage of 100 feet along the easterly side of Gull Pond Lane and has a nonconforming lot area shown on the survey map to be 19,955 sq. ft. 3. The setback distances of the dwelling as exist areshown to be 58 feet from the existing bulkhead at ordinary high water Page 2 - App~J No. 4110 Matter of THOMAS E. COFFIN Decision Rendered July 29, 1992 mark, 14-1/2 feet to the northerly side property line, 15 feet to the southerly property line, and 100 feet to the front property line along Gull Pond Lane (all at their closest points). The square footage of the house as exists per assessment records is approximately 1460 sq. ft. of living floor area, plus 650 sq. ft. of garage area. 4. Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4B of the Zoning Code requires all buildings and structures located on lots upon which a bulkhead, concrete wall, rip-rap or similar structure exists and which is adjacent to tidal water bodies other than the Long Island Sound to be set back not less than seve~ty-five (75) feet from the bulkhead. 5. The amount of relief requested by this application is a variance of 15 feet for all new construction in this project, or 20% from the established setback. 6. In viewing the area it is noted that at least one neighbor has construction (accessory building) built very close to the bulkhead. It is also noted that a deck is not made of a substantial construction and will not be adverse To the immediate land area or cause pollution to the waterway. 7. In considering this application, the Board finds: (a) the relief as requested is not substantial in relation to the setbacks which have existed previously to this zoning requirement; (b) the relief as requested is not the minimum necessary to afford relief; (c) the relief as alternatively granted will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; (d) the practical difficulties are uniquely related to the property and are not personal; (e) the relief, as alternatively granted, will not an turn be adverse to the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of the town, or be adverse to neighboring properties; (f) in view of all the abovet the interests of justice will be served by granting the relief as alternatively and conditionally noted below. Accordinglyt on motion by Mr. Dinizio, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, to GR3~NT relief for an open deck addition at the rear of the existing dwelling with a setback at 43 feet to the Page 3 - App'. No. 4110 Matter of THOMAS E. COFFIN Decision Rendered July 29, 1992 outside edge oi the bulkhead, SUBJECT TO T~E FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. No permanent cover or enclosure of the deck; 2. Lighting, if any, must be shielded to the property so as to prevent disburbing glare to other properties. 2. That the deck, inclusive of step areas, shall not be closer than 43 feet to the outside of the bulkhead; 3. In interpreting Section 100-239.4B of the current zoning code, any structural enlargement or expansion within this reduced setback from the bulkhead, or other nonconforming yard areas, will require further application to and approval by this Board {unless legislative approval is enacted to exempt same). Vote of the Board: Ayes: Grigonis, and Dinizio. (Nay: was duly adopted. {Margin 4 Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Member Villa). This resolution to lk TRUSTEES 3'ohn M. Bredemeyer, III, President Henry P. SIrdth. Vice President Albert J. Kml~id, Ir. John L. Bednosk~, Jr. John B. Tutl~ll Telephone (516}~765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 :' BOAI~ OF TOIYN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTt L. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road P O Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 March 27, t992 James Fitzgerald~ Jr. Proper-T Services P.O. Box 617 Cutchogue~ NY 11935 RE: ~nomas Coffin SCTM ~1000-35-4-28.25 · d- Dear Mr. F~tzgeral . The following action was taken by the Southold Town Board of I · Trustees at their regdlar meeting of March 26~ _992. RF~SOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Trustees grants a wa~er to construct & 14' X 20' deck attached to house~ as on application~ shown if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact %his office. ~o~ ~ruiy yours, President~ President Board of Trustees JMB:djh cc: Bldg. Dept. Proper-T Permit Services POST OFFICE BOX 617, CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 (516) 734 - 5800 CORRECTED COPY March 16, 1992 President Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Request for Waiver on Behalf of Thomas Coffgn SCTM No. 1000-35-4-28.25 Dear Sir: Attached are the documents which have been prepared in support of the request for a waiver to construct a deck on the prop- erty of Thomas Coffin in Greenport. If there are any questions, or if additional needed, please call me. Enclosures: Appli Vicin Tax M Proje information is Jill: This should replace the original cover letter, which refers to the Higgins property in Mattit~ck in the body of the letter, Word processors aren't as smart as we like tol think they are! Proper-T Permit Services POST OFFICE BOX 617, CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 734 - 5800 March t6, t99~ President Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold~ New York 11971 Re: Request for Waiver on Behalf of Thomas Coffin SCTM No. 1000-35-4-28.25 Dear Sir: Attached are the documents which have been of the request for a waiver to construct a property of L~rcncc ~i~ins in ~attituck. If there are any questions, needed, please call me. Enclosures: Application Fee Vicinity Map Tax Map Project Plan ($35) or if additional prepared in support. deck on the information is a subsidiary of THE PECONIC EASTERN CORPORATION TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III. President Henry P. Smith. Vice President Albert J. Kmpski. Jr. John L. Bednoski. Jr. John B. Tuthi[I Telephone (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTF L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516'1 765-1800 September 28, 1990 Glenn E. Just J.M.O. Consulting P.O. Box 447 Quogue, NY 11959 RE: Waiver / Thomas Coffin Dear Mr. Just: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during its regular meeting held on September 27, 1990: RESOLVED that the Town Trustees approve your request for a waiver in behalf of Thomas Coffin to amend Permit #3810 to construct a 6' x 60' (as amended after vote and as shown on map) float instead of a bulkhead4' x 40' and float;a 3'a x4'12'x 5' ramp. cantilevered platform off the existing The ~rustees request: 4' non-vegetated buffer. Please return to the Building Department for a determination on the need for an~ other permits which may be required for this project. Very truly yours, on . rL J eyer, III President, Board of Town Trustees JMB: jb cc: Bldg. Dept. CAC File j.m.o, consulTing p.o. box 447 quogue, n.y. 11959 (516) 653.0607 'TOWN OF SOUTHOLD~ September 5, 1990 Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 ~Iain Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Y~r. JohnS, Bredemeyer, III Re: P~t':'~o; 3810. Th~ma~ C~ffin Dear Mr. Bredemeyer: On behalf of F~. Thomas Coffin we are requesting a modification to the above noted permit. At this time Mr. coffin ~s seeking approval te constrnct a 6~ x40' float instead of a 4' x 40' float as well as a 4' x 5' ca~tii~ver~d platform off .the existing bulkhead and a 3' x t2''ramp~? the Board's review I have enclosed copies of the revised site plan. Should any member of the Board of Trustees have any questions concerning this request or should any more fees be owed the Board, please do not hesitate in contacting this office. Sincerely, Glenn E. Just GEJ:dt Enc. TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III, Presidem Henu P. Smi~, Vice Presidem Albert J. Krupski. Jr. John L. Bednoski. Jr. John B. Tuthill Telephone (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOIT L. HARRIS Sul~visor Town Halt, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax {516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 March 26, 1990 Glen Just J.M.O. Consultanting P.O. Box 447 Quogue, NY 11959 Re: App. No. 2-2-90-35-4-5 Dear Mr. Just: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during its regular meeting held on Marck 22, 1990 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Glen Just on behalf of Thomas Coffin applied to the Southold Town TrusEees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated January 22, 1990 and, WHEREAS said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on March 22, 1990 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT GLEN JUST ON BEHALF OF THOMAS COFFIN BE AND HEREBY IS GRANTED PERMISSION UNDER THE WETLAND ORDINANCE TO: Install 4 X 40' floating dock along an existing timber bulkhead, and to maintenance dredge a 10' X 60' area of dredged canal to 4' at MLW. Approximately 90 c.y. of spoil to be trucked to an upland disposal site. This permit will expire two years from the date it is signed if work has not comz~enced by said date. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of'this notification. Two inspections are required and the Trustees are to be notified upon completion of said project. Please return to the Building Department for a determination on the need for any other permits which may be required for this project. Permit will be issued upon payment of the following fees for work to be done below Mean High Water Mark: Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB:jmt cc: Bldg. Dept. Conservation Advisory Council file NOTICE OF HEARINGS ON WETLAND APPLICATIONS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE HELD BY THE TOWN TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, AT THE SOUTHOLD TOWN HALL~ MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK ON THURSDAY, March 22, 1990, ON THE FOLLOWING APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE WETLAND ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN. 7:15 P.M. In the matter of the application of John H. Geideman in behalf of Leander Glover to construct a 25' x 4' dock, a 3' x 10' ramp, and (2) 6'x20' floats on Bay Avenue s/o Sterling Road on Mudd Creek, Cutchogue, NY. 7:16 P.M. - In the matter of theapplication' ' os" J. M. O. uonsu~lng" ~' in behalf of Thomas E. coffi~ to install a 4' x'40' floating dock along an existing timber bulkhead~ and to maintenance dredge a 10' x 60' area of a dredged canal to 4' at MLW. Approximately 90 c.y. of spoil to be trucked to an upland disposal site. Project is located at 305 Gull Pond Lane, Greenport, NY an6 fronting Fordham Canal. 7:17 P.M. - In the matter of the application of Proper-T Services in behalf of Constantinos Markotsis to replace 90 1.f. of bulkhead with new bulkhead 18" to seaward of old bulkhead; extend bulkhead 20'+; relocate walkway, ramp, and floating dock at new bulkhead; and dredge area around floating dock to approximately 3' at low water. Location of property is Williamsburg Rd (Private) off Main Bayview, Southold, NY, fronting Canal off Corey Creek. 7:18 P.M. - In the matter of the application of J. M. O. Consulting in behalf of Southold Shores Boat Basin to enlarge an existing docking facility by the installation of (2) 5' x 20' floats and (5) 3' x i8' floats; based on amended map dated November 7, 1988. Project location Ks in Sage Cove on Blue Marlin Drive, Southold, NY. 7:19 P.M. Land Use Company in behalf of Frank Vermaelen, Jr. to construct a single family dwelling and sanitary system on a 40,00 s.f. lot. Dwelling to be located 125' landward of tidal wetland, sanitary system to be set back 212' from said line. Approximately -200 c.y. of fill to be placed within building area and stabilized with vegetation cover. Approximately 100 yards of fill necessary to construct pervious driveway. An 8" culvert pipe will be placed beneath driveway to ensure continued functioning of adjacent wetland area. Additionally, a 50' undisturbed vegetative buffer will be maintained along the entire wetland edge. Property located w/s of Bay Avenue, Mattituck, NY ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN SAID MATTERS SHOULD APPEAR AT THE TIME AND PLACE ABOVE SPECIFIED AND WILL BE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD. COMMENTS MAY BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING PRIOR TO THE HEARING. Dated: March 6, 1990 John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Board of Town Trustees By: Jane Blados, Clerk PLEASE PUBLISH ONCE, THURSDAY, March 8, 1990 AND FORWARD ONE AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III, PRESIDF/qT, BOARD OF TRUSTEES, Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, 11971. Copies to: L.I. Traveler-Watchman, Suffolk Times, Town Clerk's Bulletin Board. TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer. III. President Henry P. Smith. Vice President Albert J. Kxupski. Jr. John L. Bednoski. Jn John B. Tuthill Telephone (516) 765~1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD sco'rr L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hail, 53095 ~Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT · APPLICATION NO. 2-2-90-35-4-5 NAME: Thoams E. Coffin DATE: February 22, 1990 RESOLVED that pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southotd, notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Trustees, as Lead Agency for the action described below, has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. TYPE OF ACTION: Unlisted in CEA DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Install a 4' x 40' floating dock along an existing timber bulkhead and to maintenance dredge a 10' x 60' area of a dredged canal to 4' a MLW. Approximately 90 c.y. of spoil to be trucked to an upland disposal site. LOCATION: 305 Gull Pond Lane, Greenport, NY in the Fordham Canal Tax map No. 1000-35-4-5 REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: 1. An on site inspection has been conducted by the Board of Trustees. 2. An environmental assessment, submitted by the applicant and reviewed and completed by the Board of Trustees, has indicated that no significant adverse effects to the environmenu are likely to occur should the projec~ be implemented as planned. 3. Because there has been a response from the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council indicating that this project would not have a significant effect on the environment. CC: CAC ZBA PB Btdg Dept N.Y.S.D.E.C. Army Corps of Engineers US Army Coq~ of Engineers New York District ,~acob K. Javits Federal Building New York, N Y. 1{)278- 0090 Public 'Notice In replying refer to: Public Notice No. 13963-90-0070-L2 Published: 20.FEB 90 Expires: 23 NAP, 90 To Whom It May Concern: The New York District, Corps of Engineers has received an application for a Department of the Army permit pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C~ 403). APPLICkNT: Mr. 2130 Paddock Road Seaford, New York 11783 ACTIVITY: Install a timber float and dredge with upland disposal WATERWAY: Greenport Harbor, Gardiners Bay LOCATION: Greenport, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York A detailed description and plans of the applicant's activity are enclosed to assist in your review. The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact, including cumulative impacts, of the activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the activity must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the activity will be considered including the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food production and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, state, and local agencies~ ~nd officials; Indian Tribes; and other interested parties in order GO consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers'.to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. THIS ~oTICE, Otherwise, it will be presu2ned that there are no 0bje~tiOns to ~he activity~ ~y person may request, in writing~ before this public notice expires, that a public hearing be held to collect information necessary to conside~thiS application. Requests for public he&rings shall state~ With particularity, ~he reasons why a public ~earin~ should be held. ~t should be noted that infer~ati0n submitted by mail is considered just as carefully ih the permit decision process ~nd bears the s~e weight as that fur~ished at a public hearing. Pursuant to Sectio~ 7 of the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S~C. 1531) and based upon a review of the latest published version of the threatened and endangered species listing, a preliminary ~etermination is that the activity under consideration will not affect those species listed or their critical habitat. Based upon a review of the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places, there are no known sites eligible for, or included in~ the Register within the permit area° Presently mqknowr~ archaeoiogicat, scientific, prehistorical or historical data may be lost by work accomplished under the required permit. Reviews Of activities pursuant to Section 404 Of the Clean Water Act will i~ctude application of the guidelines promulgated by the Adaiinistrator, U.S. Envirorm~entat Protection Agency, under authority of Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act and the applicant will obtain a water qnatit~ certificate or waiver from the app~oprlat state agency in acc~ordance with Section 401 of the Clean Water Act prior to a permit decision. Pursu~iqt to Section 307(c) of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 as ~une~d~d [16 UoS.C. 1456(c)], for activities under consideration that are located within the coastal zone of a state which has ~ federally apProved coastal zone management program~ the applicant has certified in the permit application that the activity complies w~uh~ and wil~ be conducted in a manner that ~s consistent with~ the approved state coastal zon~ management program. B~ this public notice, we are requesting the state's concurrence with~ objection to~ or waiver of the applicant,s certification~ No permit decision ~1± be made unLil one of these actions occur. For activities within the coastal zone of New York State~ the applicant's certification and accompanyin~ information is available from the New York State Department of State, Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfront Revitalizatien, Coastal Zone Management Program, 162 Washington Avenue, Albany~ New York 12231 Telephone (518) 474-3~42. Comments regarding the applicant's certification should be so addressed. tn addition to any required water quality certificate and coastal zone management program concurrence, the applicant has obtained or requeste~ the foi10wi~g goverP~ental autho~izati0n for the activity under consideration: N.Y. State Dept. Town of Southeld It is requested of Environmental Conservation Tidal Wetlands Permit Permit that you communicate the foregoing information concerning the activity to any persons known by you to be interested and who did not receive a copy of this notice. If you h~ve ~yq~'stions concerning, this application, y0~may cOntact this off~ce at,(2i~!) ,264-39t2 and~ask,for Mr.~ Michael Inf~rna. FOR THE DISTRICT ENGINEER: Enclosures APPLICATION NO. 9(I-~QTM-L2 PUBLIC NOTICE NO.. 13963-90-88~0-[2' DESCRIP~!O5~ OF WORK The a~p%ic~nt, Mr. Thomas coffin, has requested Department of the Army au~ho~izatl0n te install a timl~er float and dredge with upland disposal in Greenport Harbor, Gardiners Bay at Greenport, Town of Southold, Suffolk county, New York for the stated purpQse of providing additional recreational mooring. The wark would involve the installation of a 4 foot wide by ~0 foot lo~§ timber float along an existing b~lkllead~ An area measuring approximatel~ i0 feet by 60 feet water~ard of the proposed float and existing moor~n~ assembly would be dredged to 4 feet below mean low water, removing approximately 90 cubic yards of material. Ali dredged material would he deposited at an upt~d location where it would be suitably retained from reentering the waterway. Applic~t proposes to mmq~11 a 4 x40 float dock alcmg ~m e~Asting t.imbe": · ~m~d to ~mintemsmm dredg~ a lO'x60' area of a dr~dg~d amml toa depth of-4' at ~w. Remilt~mt s~oil(ag~romgO c,y. of sand) sba11 be tnmked to an upland site for disposal. At F~z~m Carol, Tom~ of Soathold, Cotmty of Suffolk, New York. . Dmbam: M~n low ~ter iocus: ~2"21'/ 4f0~' $CAL£ 0 Suffolk Cot~ty S~le 1'=3000' DREDGED CANAL '~-----FLOOD EBB~ W l D TH ~ 50' ~ ~ ~ ~ '~PFC)e. 4'X4CJ FLOAT AKE;4 TO GULL POND LANE Adjacent Owners 1. George Starkey 2.Loretta McBurney ~/~,/~! ~,lr, l~ SHEET /OF'/_ CONSULTING,-, WADING R IV'ER N.Y. Page RESOLVED to.recommend to the Southola Town Trustees DISAPPROVAL AS $~BMITTED Wetland Application No. 1-15-90-144-3-40.2 submitted by the Land I~se Company on behalf of Frank Vermaelen~ Jr to construct a single family dwell~in§ and sanitary system on a 40,000 s.f. lot located on the west side of Bay Avenue. Dweltin§~ to be located t25' landward of the tidal wetland boundary while sanitary system will be set back 212' from said line. House construction will require approx. 200 c.y. of fill to be placed within building area and stabilized with vegetation cover. It will be necessary for access ~o cross a narrow area of formerly connected tidal wetlands, approx. 110 s~f. of wetland area will be impacted by the placement of 100 c.y. of fill necessary to construct a pervious driveway. The CAC suggests the applicant goes to the ZBA for the driveway on the so~th side of lot. By doing so, the driveway can function without destroying the ~etlands. Bay Avenue, Mattituck Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. Application No. 1-13-90-110 7-28 submitted by En-Consultants on behalf of Gus Wade has been withdrawn according to Southold Town Trustee President, Jay Bredemeyer. RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees APPROVAL WITH STIPULATIONS Wetland Application No. 1-12-90-76-3-24 submitted by Wayne Monson to construct a single, private, dock, ramp and platform adjacent to existing bulkhead and dredge 80 c.y. The CAC approves with the stipulation that the construction does not impede f~ture dock, floats, etc for any neighbors directly across the creek nor impede navigation in the creek. 600 Smith Drive, Southold Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. Application No. 1-14-90-117-5-46 of Larry Tuthill was tabled to await further information. RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees APPROVAL WITH STIPULATION of Wetland Application No 1-17-90-139-2-33 submitted by J. H. Geideman for Leander Glover to construct a 25' x 4' dock, a 3' x 10' ramp and ~ow 6' x 20' floats. The CAC approves provided the catwalk is elevated the standard ~' above grade of marsh. Bay Avenue, Cutchogue Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees APPROVAL of Wetland Application No. 2-2-90-35-4-5 submitted b~ J.M.O. Consulting for ~ to install a 4' x 40' flaot dock along an existing ti mber bulkhead and to maintenance dredge a 10' x 60' area of a dredged canal to 4' at MLW 305 Gull Pond Lane, Greenport Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees APPROVAL of Wetland Application No. 2-1-90-140-1-7 submitted by Proper-T Services on behalf of Rita Martin to construct a walkway 30' x 4' with steps; hinged ramp 12' x 4'; floating dock~ 12' x 5~ and install two piles ot secure floating dock. Maiden Lane, Mattituck Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. Telephone (516) 765-1501 To: From: Dated: Re: Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council February 20, 1990 Recommendation of Applications Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York lt971 ' SOUTHOLD TOWN ~ ~.1 CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL I i! ~ FEB ~ 0 ,~g The following recommendations were made by the CAC at its last meeting of February 16, 1990: RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees APPROVAL of Wetland Application No. 478 submitted by Coatello Marine on behalf of JOHN VASSIL to amend Wetland Permit no. 478 to extend existing 6' x 24' float dock 10' for a total of 6' x 34'. Salt Lake Lane, Mattituck Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees APPROVAL AND DIS APPROVAL of Wetland Application No. 1-4-90-81-1-16.1 submitted by En-Consultants on behalf of Edward Deutsch. The Council approves the construction of a ~' x 16' hinged ramp secured to drest of bank by two 4" posts; and a 6' x 20' float secured by two 8" diameter pilings. The CAC disapproves the construction of 215 I.f. of timber retaining wall at or above the line of MHW. The Council feels this is actually bulkheading and suggest the applicant plant native vegetation to stabilize the beach and bluff. Regarding the construction of the single family dwelling with garage, deck, drive- way, well and sanitary system the CAC feels the applicant move the house back so there will be no disturbance within 75', i.e. trucks clearing the area for work. All work should be at least 75' away. Briar Lane, Southoid _Vote of Council: Ayes: Ali Motion carried. RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees APPROVAL of Wetland Application No. 1-6-90-103-3-7 submitted by En-Consultants on behalf of Dr. David Winkler to construct a tiber dock consisting of a 4' x 130' fixed elevated (4' above grade of marsh) walk; 4' x 12' rampl 6' x 20' float secured by town 8" diameter pilings. Beebe Drive, Cutchogue Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees DISAPPROVAL of Wetland Application No. 1-3-90-90-4-12 submitted by En-Consultants on behalf of Erika Swimmer to construct a one family dwelling, sanitary system with retaining wall, well and bulestone driveway, all as shown on submitted site plan. Approximately John M. Bredemeyer, III, Presidenl Henry P. Smith. Vice President Albert J. Kmpski, Jr. John L. Bednoski. Jr. John B. Tuthill Telephone (516) 765-1892 FEB 9 1990 SCOTt L. HARRIS Supervisor ~i~llffi~ ~ Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Fax (516) 765-1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST TO: C/~/~ C~U~7~-O/~O/_Z,/~ ID~ DATE': ~x~- ~ - ~'~ Enclosed is a permit application and a-completed part I of the Environmental AssessmeNt Form. Southold Town Trustees are interested in your ageny's comments in acting as SEQRALead Agency for: NA E: LOCATION:-~15- ~LL ~ ~,.~ PE~IT ~QUIRED: ~) TO~ WETL~ (~) SEQRA CLASSIFICATION: ( ) T~e I ~) ~LISTED PERMIT OTHER//~C29~C 77~ /~/~7'-Z_,~,~/~O$ Type II CEA ~ooW / c Please contact John M. Bredemeyer, III, President, within 30 days and be advised that the Southold Town Trustees (W~_~T)/(~A~k -~) ~o assume lead agency. · SENT TO: DOS ( ) DEC (~) DOH ( ) PB ( ) ZBA ( ) BLD ( ) Please complete, detach and return this form to expedite processing. Involved Agency: ~~. 4 ~o~ ~~ Project Name:7' _ ~ ~3~ Location: ~ o~_ ~ SCTM: \~e~co We at k.3~%~'~3~_~'. (Have/No) objection to Southold Town AGENCY "' . Trustees assuming Lead Agency. Comments/Reasons: Signature o~ Authorized Representative ARIOH TIRLtNG oRIENT HARBOR Cteves P~ soUT'HOLD NPORT ' o~ Lz'~'/ ? Z~ay Be~ch P~ S N ] New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12233 I~F.~ION ~ ]~UILDn~G 40 STAT1/ L~RS1TY ~ N~ ~O~ ~R~ N~ORK llTffa January 30, John Bredemeyer Southold Town Hall 53095 Mian Road Southolg, New York Dear~Mr BredemA%er, RE: Ii97l LEAD AGENCY COORDINATIONREQUEST The purpose of this request is to determine' under A~ticle 8 (State Envjronn men:a~ Quality Review - SEQR) of the EngiPonment~l C6nser~A{ion LaW and 6 N¥CRR' ~art 617 the following: Your agency's interest ~n acting as lead agency; 2 Your agency's jurisdiction ih the action described below; and 3, Zssues of concern which your agency believes should be evaluated. Enclosed is a copy of the permit application and a completed Part 1 of the Environmental Assessment Form to assist you in responding. Projecn Name: Thomas Coffin dredge 10' X 60' area of canal to & feet deep at mman low water, construcn l' X 40' float. Pro~ect Location: Gull Pond Lane, Greenport DEC Project Number: 1-4738-00077/00001-0 DEC Permits: tidal wetlands, water Q~ality , protection of waters SEqR Classification: x~x~Type I [ ] Unlisted DEC Contact Person: Susan Acke'r~an~ Sr. Environmental An~lvsc DEC Position: (516)751-7900 in Suffolk Co. Peconic Bay critical Environmental A~e~ ]EC has no 3ectlon t% your-agenc~y--or,~n~ther agency assuming lead agency status for this action:~ b~t'r~rv~s t~e ~igh~c to comment on this acti,~ if a ~os~tive det~fib~bf Si~gn~fican~ :is made. ~ [] [] [] -2- DEC has no objection ~o your agency or another agenc~v~ssu..m~qg ~e~d .a~y. · status for this action, but we have the following concerns regarding this project (see "comments" below). DEC wishes t~sNume~j~ad agency status for this action. ? The proposed action nas been identified by DEC as occurring wholly or oartially within or substantially contiguous to a critical environmental area (CEA) that was designated by It is the position of this Deoartment that your agency, if i~ has a juris- diction over the action, should assume the lead agency role based on ~ne existence of the CEA and the fact that the anticioated impacts are primarily of local significance. [ ] Other. (See commen~s below) Comments (Optional): Please review attatched information. Response: [] Please resoond to this request within 30 days of the date of this letter. If no response is received within 30 days, we will assume that you have no objection to DEC. or another agency assuming the role of lead agency, and have no commen~s ~o offer regarding the proposed action at this time. tf qeither your agency nor any other involved agency, including DEC, has indicated a will- ingness to serve as lead agency within 30 days of this letter: W'~--wiJ.]_.~etition the Commissioner~ lead agedcy [ ] W~'ssio~er o ~.'- m ~ ate ~our agency as l~, ve jurisdiction. ~lease feel free to contact this office for further information or discussion. S~ncerely,~ Susan Ackerman Sr. Environmental Analyst Enclosures cc: (see distribution list) I~EOION I BUtLDIHG ~ · "~' JOINT APPLICATION FOR P~j~'~'if "<' DEC APPLICATION NUMBk~ ' {3[S:~,~i~' ~ORPS OF ~NGINEERS APPLICATION NO. LIST PREVIOUS PERMIT APPLICATION NUMBERS AND DATES [if any) 2. APPLICANT IS A AN L~O~wnel J~J Lessee NAME OF APPLICANT {Use Full Name] MAILING ADDRESS TELEPHONE [Where can be reached during day) STATE ZIP CODE NAME OF ~Owner I~gent/Contact Person (Check one~, MAILING ADDRESS POST OFFIC[ 5. PROJECTIFACILITY~ATION [Mark location on map, see Number la on reverse side] 7. HAS WORK BEGUN ON PROJECT? J~] Yes '~No 9. PROPOSED USE: J~ Private [] Public [] Commercial TELEPHONE [Where can be reached during dayJ STATE J ZIP CODE 8. Will PROJECT UTILIZE STATE LAND? []'(es ~No 10. PROPOSED STARTING DATE: ' 1' ;[T;~;~ COMPLETION DAT E: 12, FEE OF [NYS Permit Only] 15. CERTIFICATION: I hereby affirm that under penality of perjuw that information provided on this form and all attachments submitted herewith is true to the best of my knowleege and belief Calse statements made herein are ounishable as a Class A misdemeanor pursuant to Section 210.45 of the Penal Law. Further. the app leant accepts full responsibility for all damage direct or indirect bf whatever nature, and by whomever suffered, arising out of the proiect 3reject. In addition Federal Law 18 U.S.C Section 1001 orovides for a fine of not more than $10.000 or imprisonment for not more than five years, or both. j.m.o, consulting. box 361 * ~l~th ~OOnt~y i~Oad wading river, n.y. 11792 (~16) 929,~77S ~e[efax (~ 16) 929~ ~09 -~,~)~:)licant. preoose~ Lo ~.ns~:tall a 4'x40' floa'b dock alen~ an exis'~:in~ '~imber bulkhead and to ma.~ntenance dredge a ~.0'x60' area of a dredged canal bo-4 at ML.W. The resultant spoil, apl]rex:(.matel¥ ~0 c,,v. o'~' sand shai1 be trucked te an upland dispesa I site. ! 14-1E~-4 2/S7)--Tex! ~ P~k~EOT LD.' (C Quality Review SEQR OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? LAND USE IN ¥~¢rNrrY OF PROJECT? [] Industria! [] Commercial [] Agrfculture E~Park/ForestlOpen space []Other ~PPROVAJ~ OR FUNDING. NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? ~TION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE '~O THE BEET OF MY KNOWLEDGE state agency, complete the proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 J. CLAUSE, ~ TRUSTEES John M. Brederneyer, [] President Henry P. Smith. Vice President Albert J. Krapski. Jr. John L. Bednoski. Jr. John B. Tuthill Telephone (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town I-Iai, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southo~d, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST TO: C//-~/~ C0~/-C7-0/~0ff/~/~' DATE: ~- ~ - ~O Enclosed is a permit application and a completed part I of the Environmental Assessment Form. Southold Town Trustees are interested in your ageny's comments in acting as SEQRA Lead Agency for: NAME: C O/~: ~/'tV'~. ~/~o~J ~ LOCATION.-~93- ~L~ /3~ ~W,.~ c~~°er /%/ f T~ ~:/ooo.-~-- ~ PE~IT % ~m/~ DESC~:~:J ~::~c~Jm ~ ~P PE~IT REQUIRED: ~) TO~ WETL~D (:) OTHER~J~G ~ ~:~//~I SEQ~ CLASSIFICATION: ( ) T~e I ( ) T~e II (:) ~LIS~D ~) CEA ~:c0W~c~w~Z~m~ Please contact John M. Bredemeyer, III, President, within 30 days and be advised that the Southold Town Trustees (W~T)/(~ ~) to ass~e lead agency. SENT TO: DOS ( ) DEC (~) DOH ( ) PB ( ) ZBA ( ) BLD ( ) Please complete, detach and return this processing. Involved Agency: Project Name: Location: ~SCTM: We at (Have/No) AGENCY Trustees assuming Lead Agency. form to .expedite objection to Southold Town Comments/Reasons: Signature of Authorized Representative TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Henry P. Smith, Vice President Albert J. Kmpski. Jr. John L. ]~ednoski, Jr. John B, Tuthil] Telephone (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516~ 765-1800 February 5, 1990 Mr. John Holzapfel, Chairman Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Holzapfel: Transmitted herewith is application No. 2-2-90-35-4-5-for a wetland application submitted by J. M. O. Consulting on behalf of Thomas E. Coffin. Please prepare a written report of findings and recommendations with respect to this application. Very truly yours, ~ohn M. Bredemeyer,'II~I~Y President ~ Board of Town Trustees JMBjjmt TELEPHONE (516~ 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEE~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLO Town tta 1, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, N~w York 11971 APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE TOWN TRUSTEES, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK, FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT PURSUANT TO THE LAWS, ORDINANCES biND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE COASTAL AND INTERIOR WETLANDS, FLOOD PLAINS AND DRAINAGE AREAS OF SOUTNOLD TOWN, AND THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 32 OF THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. APPLICATION NO~-~O-~ -7Z9_ .:.~,a~4--- ./Td-~' APPLICANT'S NAME: Thomas E. Coffin MAILING ADDRESS: 2130 Paddock Road, Seaford, N.Y. AGENT: Glenn E. Just/ J.M.0. Consulting AGENT ADDRESS: P.O. Box 447, Quogue, N.Y. 11959 DATE 1/P/OD TEL. NO. 785-6322 11783 TEL NO. 653-0607 PERMIT REQUESTED TO: App/icant proposes to install a 4'x 40' tqc~t dock along m~ existing timh=r tlfl~ho~ ~d tO m~int~m~nr~ ~ a 10'x 60' area of a dredged c~r~l to -4' at l¢~Jg. The re~llt~,~t spoil~ ~?,~n~tely oD c.y. of sari shsll be trucked to am ,?l~r~ disg~ ~l site. LOCATION OF PROPERTY FOR REQUESTED PERMIT: 305 Gull Pond I arm, Greenport HAMLET: - Greenpor t TAX MAp NO: 10 0 0 - Unknown . CREEK, BAY OR HARBOR FRONTING PROPERTY: Fordham Canal SIZE OF PROPOSED WORK: LENGTH: See Above WIDTH: See Above ~ ~ ~ ~ · App. Page2. YDS. TO BE EXCAVATED: '~ 90 c.y. YDS. TO BE FILLED: ~ MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED: Land based crane WIDTH OF CANAL, CREEK OR BAY FRONTING PROPERTY: ~50' DEPTH AT LOW TIDE: 2' AVER. RISE IN TIDE: DISTANCE TO NEAREST CHANNEL: ~20' DISTANCE PROJECT EXTENDS BEYOND SIMILAR PROJECTS IN AREA: AREA ZONING: residential IS PROJECT FOR PRIVATE OR BUS. USE: INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY: Private recreational DESCRIBE KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON PREMISES: Previous]y dredEed, bulkheaded and dock installed HAS ANY PRIOR LICENSE OR PERMIT BEEN ISSUED TO ERECT STRUCTURES, OR DEPOSIT FILL ON SAID PREMISES: unknown private DREDGE, HAS ANY LICENSE OR PERMIT EVER BEEN REVOKED OR SUSPENDED BY A GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY: unknown DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION OF PROPERTY: H~Hg~ m~r{~l tn b~ placed landward of house and bulkhead reRraded and seeded DESCRIBE PROPOSED CONDITION OF PROPERTY AFTER WORK IS COMPLETED. INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITE IF NECESSARY: see above ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED WHICH WOULD PROHIBIT THIS PROJECT: none WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER IF NOT THE SAME AS APPLICANT: ~nel os~d 617.21 Appendix A SEC~ _.- State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly marme~. ~hethe~ a projet or action may be sign f cant The question of whether an action may be significant is nbt always easyto answer Frequen ly0 there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable It is a so understood that those who determin significande may have tte or no forma knowledge of the environment or may be technica ly .e~pert in env ronment~ analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the br the question of significance, oader concerns affectin The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determinatio process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to al [ow introduction of information to fita project or actior Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1~- Provides obiective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic projec data. it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a proiect or action, it provide, guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered sma I to moderate or whether it is a potentially large impact. The form a~so identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any irt F~act in Part 2 is identified as potent]ally-large, then Part 3 is used~o evaluatewhether or not the impact is actually important. L DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify Ihe Portions of EAF completed for this project: ~I~ Part 1 ~ Part 2 ' ~-~]Part 3 Upon review of the informatio~ recorded on this EAF {Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate}, and any other supporting informauon, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact{s) and. therefore, is one which ~vitl not have a significant impact on the enwronment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. I-) 13. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, ther~ will ~lot be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. ' A Conditioned Negative Declaration ~s only valid for Unlisted Actions Print er~.~pe Name oi' Respons~bJe Ot[icer in Lead Agency ~gnature oi Responsible Officer m Lead Agency Name of Action Name or Lead Agency Title of '~es[~onstble Otiicer Signature of Preparer (It different trom responsible officer) Date PART 1--PROJECT INFORr~1AT1ON Prepared by Project Sponsor . NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action Droposed may have a significant on the environment. Please cum D[ete the entire form. Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be cons as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addl informa Lion you believe will 0e needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that Completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not ir new studies, research or investigat on If information each instance. - requiring such additional, work is unavailable, so indicate and sr NAME OF ACTION LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municioality and County} NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR ADDRESS NAME OF OWNEF (ff differentt ADDRESS TELEI~H ON E ~ZIP CODE BUSINESS TELEPHONE Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N,A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall protect, both develop, ed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: [Urban I-ilndustrJa[ l-ICom mercial ~,'Residentia] (suburban] []Forest l-lAgriculture f~Other 2. Total acreage of project area: · acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brusbland (Non-agricultural1 PRESENTLY Forested acres Agricultural (Includes orcharcs, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24. 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area acres Unvegetated (Rock. earth or f d0 acres Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces acres Other (Indicate type) acres 3 What is predominant soil type(s} on project site? a. Soft drainage: [-~Wel[ drained _ % of site ~Modera[e]¥ wetl drained ~ % of site []Poorly drained % of stte b.Landlf anVclassdicationagncultural landsystem?iS involved, hOWacresmany[seeaCresl NYCRR°f soil are370).classd~ed w,thru soil group ~i thr-~ugb 4 of the N 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project sitet [~Yes ~No a. What ~s depth.to bedrock.~ [in feet} [Rural (non-f? AFTER COMPLETIOF .. 2 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may ha:,= a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered' as part of the application for approVal and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona. information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently avai ab e and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unava ab e, so ind cate and spec fy each instance. - NAME OF ACTIOH See Attached LOOATION OF ACTION (Inc ude Stree Address Mum ctp~ ty ~ncl Cou~t. y) 305 Gull Pond Lane ~ Greenport, Suffolk NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR ~ Glenn E. Jnst/ J.M.0. Consulting P.O. Bo× 447 BUSINESS TELEPHONE (516) 653-0607 CITY, PO STATE ZiP CODE Quogue I N.Y. 11959 NAME OF OWNER (If different) I BUSINESS TELEPHONE I Thomas E. Coffin ~- (516i 785-6322 2~30 Paddock Road o1~o Y. 11783 Seaford D~PIION OF ACTION S;~e Attached Please Complete Each Question- Indicate ~N.A. ii not applicable AL Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: r-lUrban []Industrial (3Commercial []Residential (suburban) i-'lForest r-]Agriculture [:]Other 2. Total acreage of project area: ~ 1/2 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non*agricultural) (All N/A~' acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock. earth or fill) acres acres Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: C3WelI drained 100 % of site i-IModerately well drained % of site (3Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, bow many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the N' Land Classificatioe System? ~/A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are.there bedrock outcroppings on project site? [:]Yes a. What is depth to bedrock? '~600 (in feet) [3Rural (non-farm) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: D0-10% ].00 % r-i10-15% % ['q15% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places.~ F1yes ~No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks.~ E~Yes ~No 8. What is the depth of the water table? N/A (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? I~Yes E3No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? l~Yes 11. Does project site contain.any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? DYes [~No According to Identify each species 12. Are there an,/ unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) I-lYes ~No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the commumty or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? DYes ~No if yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the commumty? -~Yes 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: ~T/A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributar~ 16. Lakes. a. Name ~T/A 17. Is the site served by existing'public utilities? ~Yes ~No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? b) If Yes. will ~mprovements be necessary to allow connection? ponds, wet[and areas within or contiguous to ;)roject area: Size (In acres) ~Yes .'~No I~Yes DNo 18 Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA. Section 303 and 304? DYes ~No 19. Is the site located in or substantially cor~tiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL. and 6 NYCRR 6177 DYes ~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ~Yes UNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor b. Project acreage to be developed: ~T/A acres_initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped N/z~ acres. d. Length of project, in miles: ~T/A [if appropriate) e. If the proiect ~s an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ~/A ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour ~/A [upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Initially AL]L Ultimately i. Dimensions [in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; j Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare prolect will occupy is? acres ;ltimately. Condominium length. ~/A ft. ~T/A 2. How much natural material [i.e., rock, earth, etc.] will be removed from the site? 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? E'lYes I-INo i-IN/A a. If yes, for what intend . purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I-lYes ~No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes ~No tons/cubic yards 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? ~) acres, 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important, vegetation be removed by thi~ project? DYes ~No 6. If single phase proiect: Anticipated period of construction 1 week months. Iincluding demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 1 b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of fina phase [number). 3 month 90 year, (including demolition}. 3 month 90 year. d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? I-lYes 8. Will blasting occur during construction? []Yes ~No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ~ 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ~ 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ~No ; after project is complete I-lYes I~No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposa involved? I~Yes ~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste [sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b, Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? []]Yes ~No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain D-lyes S~No 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ~Yes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ~ D-lYes ~qNo a.. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? DYes -1No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes nol go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes. explain DNo F1Yes DNo 17. Wil the pro}ect involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? []]]Yes DYes ~.No tons/month. years. ~No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ~Yes '~No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? T-lYes g~No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ,~Yes ~No If yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity ~JlA gallons/minute. 23. Tota anticipated water usage per day I~T/~r gallons/day. 24. Do. es project involve Local, State or Federal funding? I--IYes rXINo If Yes, explain 25. Apl~vals Required: City, Town, ;Village :Board ~Yes f-lNo City, Town, Village Planning Board I-lYes ~No City, Town Zoning Board DYes 1F1No City, County Health Department D--lyes Other Local Agencies [~Yes I~No Other Regional Agencies ~Yes I-'[No State Agenoes ~Yes E3No Federal Agencies I~Yes C. Zoning and Planning information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or If Yes. indicate decision required: I~zoning amendment Type Trustees N.Y.'S.D.E.C. N.Y.S.D.O.S. U.S.D.O.A. zoning decision? D-lYes I~No Clspecial use permit Dzoning variance Dsubdivision i-lsite plan Phew/revision of master plan F3resource management ~lan Pother What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? residential What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Submittal Date 1/90 12/89 12/89 12/89 What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the proposed action congistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~Yes 7. What are the predominant land use{s) and zoning classifications within a % mile radius of proposed action? residential DNo 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining]surrOunding land uses within a ~ mile? ~Yes E]No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivisib~ of land. how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? N/A 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [:]Yes ~No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation. education, police. fire protection)? -lYes ~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? I~Yes I-INo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? D--lYes ~No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? E3Yes DNo D. informational Details Attacl~ any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them, E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge, Applicant/Sp0nsor.j~L~Im~ Gl,enn E. Just for Thomas E. Coffin Date 1/22/90_ ~. )- Il/ [ /~ ,/~t --., Pres., J.M.0. Consulting ~gnature ~ / /~/~/,-~., ~ ~/Z1 ~/¥ / lille __ :~ -- If the action is i~'the~:~C~:stal Are- .~a/d~ ou~are a state a enc com late the Coasta--~Asse~ · ' ~ ¥ g y, p e ~ Form before proceeding with this assessment. $ 5J.,Ap?rova|s. R~uired: Type City, Town Village Board [-]Yes E3~o City, Town. Village Planning Board [Yes [-lNo City, Town Zoning Board i-Wes r-INo City, County Health Department r-lYes I'qNo Other Local Agencies []Yes r-INo Other Regional Agencies []Yes ~No State Agencies I-lYes [~No Federal Agencies [-IYes []No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? 2 3. ~Yes I-INo '" If Yes. indicate decision required: i-lzoning amendment F-Izoning variance []special u/permit []subdivision E]site plan [-lnew,revision of master plan I~resource management~lan E3other What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? What is the maxim Jm potential development of the site if/veloped as permitted by the present zoning? Submittal Date / 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? f $. WI' at is the maximum potential development of the si~ if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed act on consistent with the recomm/.fded uses in adopted local land use plans? [Yes 7 What are the predominant land use(s] and zonin~cJassifications within a ~,~ mile radius of proposed action? 8 Is the proeosed action compatible with adj 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of a. What is the minimum lot size 10. Will proposed action require any authori; 11. Will the orooosed action create a fire protection)? ~Yes E3No g [and uses within a 1/~ mile? how many lots are proposed? I-lyes F'IF the formation of sewer or water d stricts? [Yes [~, for any community provided services {recreation, education, polic a. If yes, is existing capacity suf~cient to handle projected demand.~ fi3yes I~No 12. Will the proposed action result i~/[~e generation of traffic significantly above present Jevels~ a. If yes, is the existing ro/~ network adequate to handle the additional traffic? lyes [Yes I-1N - t--INa D. Informational Details / Attach any additional inforr~tion as may be needed to clarify your project. If ther~ are or m'ay be any adver- impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such unpacts and the measures wh. ich vou propose to mitigate avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above rs [rue [o the [~est of my know edge. APPlicant/Sponsor Name Date Signature __ Title I[/he action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, corn ~lete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceedin with this assessment. 5 Part 2--PROJF_CT IMPACTS AND 'i'HE~R -;" Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided bv the question: Have my responses and determinations fc reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2] does not mean that it is also neceSsardy significa Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 sirr asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of, impacts and wherever, possible the threshoh magnitude that would trigger a response in cotumn 2. The examples are generally a ophcable t~rou§hout the State for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other exarr pies and/or lower thresholds may be appropn for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The imoacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each quest~ · The ~ Jm 9er of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects .... Insg'uctJons (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact· b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2] to indicate the potential size of ~ impact. If impact threshold e(~uals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but tnreshc is lower than example, check column 1 d. If rewewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as motentialiv large and proceed to PART e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2. can be mitigated by change{s) in the protect to a small to moder,- Impact. also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible· T} must be explained in Part 3. I 2 3 Small to Potential ' Can Impact Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Chan~ [] El [~Ves I-qNc [] [] ~JYes [~]Nc L-J ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Ye~... ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Y~ ~No IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result m a physical change to the orotect sJtel. -~NO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater. (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10% · Constructmn on land where the depth to the wa~er table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 f~et of existing ground surfa :e. · Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construcuon Dr expansion of a sanitary landfill · Construction m a designated ¢loodwav. · Other ~mmacts 2 WiN there be an effectt~ ...w u~;,que or unusual land forms ~Ound on the site? [ie., cliffs dunes, geological formations, etc.j,~,NO ~Y£S · Specd~c lan~ forms: 6 IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15. 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL} [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ;)rotected stream. · Extension of utilit,, distribution facilibes through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 4, Will proposed action affect any non-protected exJstiq~or new body of watert ~'NO E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeos 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5 Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ~O ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will_requ,re a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does .not have aF 0royal to serve proposed (project) action. · ProDosecJ Action requires water SUDOIV from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumomg capaow. · Construction or c.3eraton causing any contaminauon oi: a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent wdl be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,0~0 gallons per day. · Prooosed Action will likek, cau~,e siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to Er:e extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to r atural conuitions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 ~allons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses m areas without water anchor sewer services. · Proposed Action locates £omrr.ercial and!or industrial uses wh, cn may faohti~s. · O~her irrpacts: water runotf1 "~NO ,~YE$ L EXamples [nat would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 Small to Moderate Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 3 Can Impact Mitigated B Projec[ Chart ~]Yes FIN F~Yes i--IN []Yes E]Yes ON ['"~ Yes FiN r~Yes []Yes r-]Yes [-]Yes- . [~Nc E]Yes E~No E]Yes E]No [~Yes E:]No E~.Yes E]No U · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incom patible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7 Will proposed action affect air quality~ ~]~NO E~YES Examples that woutd apply to column 2 ·hour.Pr°p°sed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any gwen · Proposed Action will result [n the incineration of more than I ton of refuse per hour. · Emissf~n rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to qdustria] use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other rmpacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS a Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered ~- ;ecles~ *~NO E]YES Examptes that would apply to column 2 · Red JctJon of one or more species listed on the New Yorl~ or Federa~ Hst, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year other tha~ for agricultural purposeA. 9 Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endansered specles~ ~O ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ' Proposed Action would substantially interfere w~th anv resident or m~gratory fish, shellfish or wildfire s~ec~es. ' P~oposed Action reoulres ~he removal of more than ]0 acres o~ mature forest {over 100 '/ears of age) or other }ocally unpor[am IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Proposed Action arfecr agricultural land resources~ ~o Examples that would apply to column 2 the proposed action would sever, cross c r limit access to lane (includes crop and. hayfields, pasture, vineyard orchard, etc.} Small'to } Potential Moderate I Larq~ Impact I I~-~;~.t Can Impact E M it,.',gat ed Project Chani r-lYes []Yes E]Yes E]Yes I"-~yes i'-'iN° I-lYes r-]No [~Yes I-}No FqYes ['qNo [~Yes E]No F'tYes E]No []No ~¥es [~No ~Yes .[~No []Yes [~No [] [] E]Yes [~]No [] [] ~Yes []No [:~Yes I"-~No · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricu[tura! land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or erevent insta]lation of agricultural land management systems-(e.g., subsurface drain nes, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: . IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? e~ctO OYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in ion 617.21 Appendix Examples that would apply to column 2 · Pr•pose• land uses. or prelect comnonents obviously different from or m sharD contrast [o current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses. or prelect components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significandv reduce their enloyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Proiect components that will resuh in the elimination or significant screemng of scenic views known [o be important [o the area. · Other ~mpacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Actior impact any site or structure of historic, pre* historic or oateontological importance? ~;~NO [-]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Pr•Dosed Action Occurring whoi v or partially within or substantially conuguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic nlaces. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within tile prelect site. · ~ Proposed Action will occur n an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sKes on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other Impacts: Small to Moderate Impact O 2 3 Potential )act Be Large Mitigated By Impact Project Change [] ~[]Yes []No [] OYes [~]No [] r-]Yes [-]No [] OYes []No [] F- [:]Yes ["']No O [] OYes []No O [] [:]Yes []No [] O OYes ~No O OYes I--IN• [] O OYes []No [] .1~ _EVes E3No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 will Pr•pose• Action affect the quantity or quahtv of existing or Examples that would apply to colurfn 2 ~'NO [~YES · The permanent foreclosure et a future recreatronaJ opportunity · Other ~mpacts: [] OYes ~No [] OYes ONe j O OYes []NoJ 9 14 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 1S~malll~ - to Will there be an effect to existin§ transportatton systems,' I Moderate Examples that would apply to column 2 '~NO [~YE$ I Impact · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems, · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15 Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? [~]'N O F'IYES E×amples that would apply to cotumn 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of er, ergy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will reouire the creation-or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two fam~ w residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use, · Other ~mpacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the PrODOSeO Action? [~NO C1YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · F;lasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensldve facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · ProDosec Action will 3roduce operating no~se exceeding [ne local amment no~se levels for noise outside of structures. · Propose(] Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts:. [] [] [] F- IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ~NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of exolosion or release of hazareous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.] in the event of accident or upset condmons, or there may be -:t chronic Iow level discharge or emission, · Proposed Action may result in the bun aJ of "hazaruous wastes" in any form [i.e. toxic, poisonous, hi§hly reactive, radioactwe, irritating, infec[ious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one mdlion or more gallons of [iquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result m the excavation or other disturbance wcrnm 2,000 feet or a s~te u~ed fo~ the d~¢posal of solid or hazardous · Other cmpacts: 10 [] [] [] Potential Large Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 3 Can.Impact Mitigated Project Chart []Yes []Yes t-lYes []Yes r"~N []Yes ON. []Yes E]N I~Yes r-lN~ [~]Yes []N~ []Yes []Nc []Yes E]N~ []Yes []N~ []Yes.. E~]Nc []Yes []Ne []Yes []No :[]Yes E]NO []Yes E]No IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARAC~TER, ;. OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBo'RH'ob~'~ 18 Will proposed action affect the character of the e×~sting commumw~ £xampies that would apptv to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or vitlage in which the project is located is likely to 8row by more than 5%. · The mum tidal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a resu t of this protect. · Proposed action will conflict with officiafly adopted plans or §oals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing fadtities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.§. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. · Proposed Action wil create or e~iminate employment. · Other impacts: I 2 3 Small to PotentJa! Can Impact E Moderate Large Mitigated B~ Impact Impact Project Ch an (. [] [] ' E]Yes [] [] ' f'"lYes f-IN, [] [] l--JYes [] [] E]Yes E3N~ [] [] E3Yes E3N~ [] r-]' [~Yes E]Nc [] [] E]'~es E] [] E~Yes r-lNc [] [] ~¥es E]Nc 19. Is there, or is there ]ikelv to be. oublic controversy related to potential adverse enwronmental ~mpacts? "~NO FqyES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION oF THE IMPORTANCE OF IM,' u..'....TS' ' Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more iml~actCs) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may b mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact 'identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 BrieflydescriSetheimpac~. ~'~z'./~V~e.~3- £0~c£ a~ 8e~/~'~ 2. D~scribefif applicable} how the mpact could be mitigated or reduced tod small to moderate impact ~to~ h~- ..... c,ange~ ~. Based on the information avadable, decide if ~t is reasonable [o conclude that this impact ~s i~rl~nt, ' ' ' To answer the ~uestion of impor[ance, consider: · The urobability o~ [he ~mpact occurnng · The duration of the ~mpact ~ · Its rreversibili[v, iedudin~ permam,nl v lost resources u~' value · Whether me u~pac[ can or wdl ~e con(rolled ~¢~//e~ ~ · The regional consequence of the m')act ' Its ootential divergence from local needs and ~:oaJs ~ · Whether known oolt:ct~ons to the prolect re] ate to this ~mpac[~ (Continue on a [tach~ en[s) 11 Applicant proposes to install a 4'x40' float dock almg an existing timbe-~ ~ ard to maintermnce dredge ~ 10 x60' area of a dr~ canal to a depth of-4' at ~W~ ?esGltant spoil(aDprox.90 c.y. of sand) shah be trucked to an uplard site for disposal. At Fordam Canal, Greenport, Tow~ of So~thold, Cotmty of Suffolk, New York. lNG Applic~t: ~xmss E. Coffin B~pose: Private recrea~icrml docking LOCUS: ~2"21'/ 41~0~' SCALE Suffolk Cctmty iI=30CO DREDGED CANAL - 4' '~----~LOODEBB==. -tW-MLW~. PROP. 4'X40' FLOAT ~. DREDGED GULL FOND LANE &E._CFKAI SCAL~ ~,.P'zop. 4'x40' float SHEET I OF 7i CONSULTING,-., WADING RIVER, N.Y. J.M.O. Consulting P.O. Box 447 Quogue, N.Y. 11959 516-653-0607 A To whom it may concern: Please be advised that I have authorized Glenn E. Just, President of J.M.O. Consulting to act as the agent on my behalf to apply for and to secure the necessary permits through your agency. Dated: THOMAS E. COFFIN 44 S 0 U N D STIRLING PIPES COVE ...'/ YachfClub 196 ,"~, . ~hn se~age dinpo~cl and ~Tater ...... ~ { ' Chfof of General Engineering I Services ... N,66 Ol 20 E, 202,~ EL EV.- 2.8 //