Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CEDAR BEACH PARK ASSOCIATION
TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, IIL President Henry P. Smith, Vice President Albert J. Krupski, Jr. John L. Bednoski, Jr. John B. Tuthill Telephone (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ScoTr L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 July 25, 1990 TO: FROM: RE: Supervisor, Scott L. Harris and the T~wn John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Cedar Beach Park Association Board At the Town Trustees' regular monthly meeting on June 21, 1990, the Board heard many serious concerns of Mr. Robert Maus, President, and over twenty (20) members oi the Cedar Beach Park Association over the nearly impassible/unnavigable condition of Cedar Beach Creek and its tributaries. In order to fully assess the problem, the Board performed a site inspection on the creek and its tributaries on July 17, 1990. What we found was a creek in serious need of dredging by all objective standards. Not only was navigation nearly impossible, but lack of circulation in the smaller tributaries (which are undoubtedly over-enriched from upland nutrient sources) has led to them becoming choked with undesirable vegetation, such as Ulva. While the Trustees could be supportive of a properly scaled dredging of the area, ~ajor obstacles to such a project would be permitting, environmental assessment, and funding. Although the Trustees regularly handle the former two concerns, we have no means to fund or support such a project financially. Since we are supportive of this kind of project and current outside help seems to be diminishing, should not the Town Board or the Trustees be considering establishing a funding mechanism for needed dredging with costs born by the boaters who use toWn waters? Presently there is an explosion in the number of boats at moorings in state waters which the Town Board could regulate for a fee. Do you think the Trustees should consider creating annual mooring fees for boats at docks and increasing our current fees for boats at moorings in the creeks? If these ideas or any others should be explored, would the Town Board be interested in a work session with the Trustees? If so, please let us know as soon as possible what data you would be interested in for such a meeting. (For instance, we currently have no statistics on numbers of boats at docks in creeks or at moorings in state waters.) - Any long range help we can develop now will undoubtedly be in the best interest of 'all our boaters and the health of the creeks they occupy. John M. Bredemeyer, Iti, President Henry P. Sm~h, Vice Pre,~dent Albert 1. Kru?ski. Jr. John L. Bednoski, Jr. John B. Tuthill Telephone (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN FRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box t 179 Southold, New York t 1971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (5t6) 765-1800 June 4, 1990 Robert Maus, President Cedar Beach Park Association, Inc. 450 C!earview Road Southo!d, NY 11971 RE: Maintenance Dredging Dear Mr. Maus: The Board of Trustees would like to meet with the residents of Cedar Beach Park on Thursday June 21, 1990 at the worksession, which starts at 6:00 p.m. in the meeting hall at Town Hall. Please let us know if this date and time is convenient. Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, Iii President, Board of Trustees 3I~: j mt © FRANK A. KUJA~VSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER. III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 September 20, 1988 TELEPHONE {516) 765-1892 Mrs. Sophia Adler Box 1481 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Application No. 88-0349-L2 Public Notice 13395-88-0349-L2 Dear Mrs. Adler: Please be advised that this office is in receipt of a copy of the correspondence you have forwarded to the Army Corps of Engineers regarding the Cedar Beach Project. This application is incomplete until this office receives copies of all of the necessary permits from other agencies as may be applicable to this project. Upon receipt of the other permits, the Trustees will schedule a public hearing on this project. We will forward to you a copy of the public notice as per your request. Should you need any additional information, or have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office at 765-1932. Thank you for your interest and concern. Very truly yours, Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. President Board of Town Trustees FAK: ip cc: Supervisor Francis J. Murphy FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT I. KRUPSKI, JR.. Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L, BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE ~516) 765-1892 September 12, 1988 Mr. Glenn Just J.M.O. Consulting North Country. Road Box 361 Wading River, New York 11792 Re: Application No. 62I, Cedar Beach Park Association Dear Mr. Just: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees duringtheir regular meeting held on August 25, 1988 regarding the above application: Moved by Trustee Krupski seconded by Trustee Bednoski it was RESOLVED that the Town Trustees RESCIND the Significant Environmental Declaration declared on the application submitted by J.M.O. Consulting on behalf of the Cedar Beach Park Association whereas the dredging has been reduced and the remaining dredginq is~for several property owners. Very truly yours, President Board of Town Trustees FAK:ip cc: Robert A. Greene, D.E.C., Stony Brook Mr. M. Infurna, Army Corps of Engineers Thomas Hart, Coastal Management Conservation Advisory Council, John Holzapfel Planning Board, Bldg. Dept. Michael Corey, NYS Dept. of State Board of TrusTees - Assessment ~ Page 2. For further information regarding this application please contact: Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. President Board of Town Trustees Town Hall, Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Call: (516) 765-1892 or 765-1932 cc: Robert A. Greene, D.E.C., Stony Brook~ Commissioner Thomas C~ Jorling/ M. Infurna, Army Corps of Engineers Thomas Hart, Coastal Management ~Conservation Advisory Council <Bldg. Dept. ~Board of Appeals ~Supervisor Frank Murphy Town Clerk's Bulletin Board J.M.O. Consulting on behMf of the Cedar Beach Park Association~ Michael CoreM, Senior Environmental An~y~, State of New York, Dept. of Stat~ ~ Plaqning Board~ FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR.. President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR.; Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, HI JOHN L. BEDNOSKL JR. HENRYP. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold. New York 11971 ' S.EiQ.R.A. NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE OF NO-SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT Date: August 25, 1988 TELEPHONE (516~ 765-1892 APPLICATION NO.: 62i NAME: J.MoO. Consulting on behalf of the Cedar Beach Park~ Association . This notice is issued pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law; State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCP~R Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that the Southold TownTrustees, as lead agency for the action described below has determined that the project will not have a significant effecton the environment. Please take further noticethat this declaration should not be considered'a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. TYPE OF ACTION: Unlisted DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: To dredge a 520' x 12' area to a depth of 3' at MLW. Approximately 346 cu. yds. of sand is proposed to be ~f~dged--an~trucked ~o' theT0wn Landfill for disposal. LOCATION: 255 Lakeside Drive, Southold, New York 11971. REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: 1. An on-site inspection has been conducted by the Board of Trustees. 2. An environmental assessment form has been submitted by the applicant and reviewed and completed by the Board. 3. The scope of the original dredging project has been reduced by the applicant. 4. The remaining dredging is for several property owners. FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., ~esidem ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR.,Vic~Preside~ JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P.S~TH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 June l, 1988 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Glenn Just J.M.O. Consulting Corp. Route 25 A Box 2521 Wading River, New York 11792 Re: Application No. 621 Dear Mr. Just: Please be advised that the Town Trustees have declared a Significant Environmental Determination on the above referenced application. We would like to advise you that some of our concerns are with the spoil site and slumping in addition to the magnitude of the dredging proposed. We ask that you attend our work session on June 23, 1988 at 3:00 P.M. at the Town Hall, Mai~ Road, Southold. The Trustees would like to discuss this matter further with you. Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact this office at the telephone number listed above. Very truly yours, President Board of Town Trustees FAK:ip cc: D.E.C., Stony Brook Army Corps of Engineers file Planning Board PRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRtJPSKI, JR., Vice-President JOHN 1%1. BREDEMEYER, IIl IOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P, SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN DF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold. New York 11971 S.E.Q.R.A. SIGNIFICANT DECLARATION NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT Date: May 25, 1988 Pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations, and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code, the Southold Town Trustees, as Lead Agency does hereby determine that the action described below is a Type Action and may have a Significant Effect on the Environment. TELEPHONE [516~ 765-1892 Application No.: 621Name: Cedar Beach Park Assoc./J.M.O. Address: 255 Lakeside Drive, Southold, New York 11971 Description of Action: To maintenance dredge an existing channel to 4' at mlw. Resultant spoil (approximately 1025 cu. yds. of clean sand) will be trucked to an upland site. For further information please contact: Frank A. Kujaws~i, Jr., President Board of Town Trustees Southeld Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 (516) 765-1892 or (516) 765-1932 Copies to the following: Commissioner Thomas C. Jorling, D.E.C., Albany Robert A. Greene, D.E.C., Stony Brook Stephen Mars, Army Corps of Engineers Thomas Hart, Coastal Management John Holzapfel, Chairman, C.A.C. Victor Lessard, Administrator, Bldg. Dept. Planning Board Board of Appeals Bulletin Board file FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR.. Vice-President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOLrFHOLD Yown Hall, 53095 Main ]Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 May 19, 1988 TELEPHONE (516~ 765-1892 Mrs. Valerie Scopaz Town Planner Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Cedar Beach Park Association - App. No. 621 Dear Valerie: Transmitted herewith is Wetland Application no. 621 submitted by J.M.O. Consultants on behalf of the 'Cedar Beach Park Association. We would like to coordinate with you in our role as Lead Agency regarding this application. May we have your comments on same by June 8, 19_8B? Very truly yours, Frank A. Kujawski, Jr., Pres. Board of Town Trustees FAK :ip Attachment Frank A. K~awski, Jr., Pres. HENRY P. SM~H, JOHN M. BREDEMEYER. III John Bednoski, Jr. ALBERT KRUPS~,JR., Vice-President BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 1,1971 April 27, 1988 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 Mr. Glenn Just J. M.O. Consulting Route 25 A Box 2521 Wading River, New York 11792 Re: Application No 621 Dear Mr. Just: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during their regular meeting held on April 21, 1988 regarding the above matter, RESOLVED that the Southold Town Trustees TABLE the application submitted by J.M.O. Consulting on behalf of the Cedar Beach Park Association, Inc. pending receipt of a map showing the spoil site and a survey showing adjacent property owners. Should you have any questions, please contact this office at the telephone number listed above. /~ery truly yours, ~ ~ink A. Kuj~wski, Jr. President ~ Board of Town Trustees FAK :ip Frank A. Kujawski, Jr., Pres. HENRY P. SMITH. JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, I11 John Bednoski, Jr. ALBERT KRUPSKL JR., Vice-President TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold. New York 11971 April 27, 1988 Mr. Glenn Just J.M.O. Consulting Route 25 A Box 2521 Wading P. Jver, New York 11792 Re: Application No. 621 Dear Mr. Just: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during their regular meeting held on April 21, 1988 regarding the above matter. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Trustees TABLE the application submitted by J.M.O. Consulting on behalf of the Cedar Beach Park Association, Inc. pending receipt of a map showing the spoil site and a survey showing adjacent property owners. Should you have any questions, please contact this office at the telephone number listed above. V. ery truly yours, ~ ~FCFrank A. Kuj~wski, Jr. President Board of Town Trustees FAK: ip cc: file Frank A. Kujawski, Jr., Pres. HENRY P. SHITH JOHN H. BREDEMEYEt~ III John :Bednoski, Jr. ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 April 27, 1988 Mr. Frank P. Francia, P.E. Board of Directors Cedar Beach Park Association P.O. Box 394 Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr, Francia: Thank you for your letter of April 7, 1988 regarding Cedar Beach Inlet. The Board reviewed your letter during their regular meeting held on April 21, 1988 and wish to advise you that should you wish co maintenance dredge this particular area, in the future, a permit will be required from this Board. For your convenience, I have enclosed an application. Should you have any questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contacl this office at the telephone number listed above, or come into the office. We look forward to hearing from you in the future. Very truly yours, ~FB~ TKo~x n~f?W~s ~ si dent FAK: ip Attachment HENRY P. SMITH JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III, President John Bednosk~, .Jr. ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, $3095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold. New York 11971 March 25, 1988 Mr. Glenn Just J. M. O. Consulting N. Country Road Box 361 Wading River, New York 11792 Re: Application No. 621 Dear Mr. Just: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during their regular meetings held on March 24, 1988 regarding the above RESOLVED that the Southold Town Trustees declare itself lead agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in the matter of the application of 3.M.O. Consulting on behalf of the Cedar Beach Park Association, Inc. for a Wetland Permit on certain property located on Lakeside Drive, Southold. Very truly yours, JMB: ip John M. Bredemeyer, III President Board of Town Trustees HENRY P SM~H JOHN M. BREDEMEYER. III, President John Bednoski, Jr. ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR., Vice President TELEPHONE f516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold. New York 11971 March 16, 1988 Mr. John Holzapfel, Chairman Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Holzapfel: Transmitted herewith is application no. 621 for a Wetland Permit submitted by J.M.O. Consultants on behalf of Cedar Beach Park Associates. Inc. Please prepare a written repor; of findings and recommendations with respect to this application. Very lruly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, Ill President Board of Town Trustees JMB :.ip Attachment HENRY P. SMITH JOHN M. BREDEMEYER. iii. President John Bednoski, 3r. ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President TELEPHONE (516] 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 Date: March 16, 1988 To Whom It May Concern: Attached hereto is a Long Environmental Assessment Form submitted by J.M.O. Consultants on behalf of Cedar Beach Park Association, Inc. in connection with their application for a Wetland Permit to maintenance dredge an existing channel to 4' at mlw. Resultant spoil, approximately 1025 cu. yds. of clean sand shall be trucked to an upland site for disposal. Project is located at Stillwater -John M. Bredemeyer, III, Pres. Town Trustees Posted: March 16, 1988 HENRY P. SM~H, JOHN M. BREDEMEYER. III~.President John Bednoski,~Jr. ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President TELEPHONE (516~ 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 March 16, 1988 Mr. Robert A. Greene Alternate Regional Permit Administrator New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation Bldg. 40, SUNY- Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 Dear Mr. Greene: Transmitted herewith is Wetland Application No. 621 submitted by J.M.O. Consultants on behalf of Cedar Beach Park Association. We would like to coordinate with you in our role as Lead Agency regarding this application. May we have your comments on same by April 5, 1988. Very truly yours, · Bredemeyer, III President Board of Town Trustees JMB :ip Attachments cc: Commissioner Thomas Jorling, D.E.C., Albany Southold Town Building Dept. HENRY PfSMITH, _ JOHN M, BREDEI~EYER.~ III, President John Bednoski. :Jr. ALBERT KRUPSKI. JR., Vice-President BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Sonthold, New York 1 t971 March 16, 1988 765-1892 Mr. Robert A. Greene Alternate Regional Permit Administrator New York State Dept, of Environmental Conservation Bldg. 40, SUNY - Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 Dear Mr. Greene: Transmitted herewith is Wetland Application No. 621 submitted by J.M.O. Consultants on behalf of Cedar Beach Park Association. We would like to coordinate with you in our role as Lead Agency regarding this application. May we have your comments on same by April 5, 1988. Very truly yours, ~ohn M. Bredemeyer, III President Board of Town Trustees JMB: ip Attachments cc: Commissioner Thomas Jorling, D.E.~C., Albany Southold Town Building Dept.~,,~' I'ELEPHONE 516~ 765-I$01 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 SOUTIIOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL To: Southold Town Trustees From: CAC Dated: Api~il 19, 1988 The following recommendations were made by the CAC at their regular meeting held Thursday, April 14, 1988: No. 614 - Oyster Farm Associates by Netecl of America, Ltd. - Table until receipt of additional information. No. G15- No. 616 - ~1o. 617- No. 618- No. 619- ~1o. 620- No. 621 - Recommendations on waiver requests: Kiefer - Recommend approval of waiver request Spetsiotes - Recommend approval of waiver request Pearlman - Recommend denia of waiver request Stalk - Will advise at Trustees' meeting. Bernard and Carole Kiernan - Recommend approval. John C. Vassil - Recommend approval. Janet Swanson - John Holzapfel is to contact Jay Tanski at Sea Grant for advise. Mr. Holzapfel will advise the TRustees of the CAC recommendation at the Trustees' meeting. Wilhelm Franken - Recommend approval. Daniel Stegner - Recommend approval with the stipulation that bulkhead is placed in kind, in place or landward. Roger and Dorothy Lamour - Recommend approval. Cedar Beach Park Associates, Inc. - Recommend approval with the stipulation that the bank slope be maintained and that the Bay Constable check the work during dredging. ~Z ........ i,..,' SOUTHOLD, L, 14 NEW YORK m4 Y -~ ~° To o., lu ire?/ J.m.o. cons n box 3/)1 · north country road wading river, n.y. 11792 {S16) 929.~7S telefax (516) 929,5621 November 18, 1988 Department of the Army New York District, Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch Jacob K. Javits Federal Building New York, N.Y. 10278-0090 Attn: Mr. Michael Infurna Re: Application No. 88-0349-02 Cedar Beach Park AsSociation Dear Mr. Infurna: Enclosed please find the "Letter of Consistency" recently issued by the N.Y.S.D.O.S. with regards to the above noted project. Sincerely, GEJ/te Enc. cc: Southold Town Trustees - App. No. 621 GAll S. SHAFFER SECRETARY Of STATE STATE OF NEW YOrk DEPARTMENT OF STATE AlbaNY. N.Y. 12231-0001 November'7, 1988 Mr. Glen Just J.M.O. Consulting Box 361 North Country Road Wading River, NY 11792 Re: F-88-189 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/New York District - Permit Application #88-0349-L2 (Cedar Beach Park Associates) Dear Mr. Just: The Department of State has completed its evaluation of your Federal Consistency Assessment Form and certification that the above proposed permit activity complies with New York State's approved Coastal Management Program, and will be conducted in a manner consistent with this program. Pursuant to 15 CFR Section 930.63, and based upon the project information submitted, the Department of State concurs with your consistency certification subject to the condition that in order to minimize water quality impacts to Cedar Beach Creek and Little Peconic Bay, dredging shall not take place between the period June I and September I of any calender year. This concurrence is without prejudice to, and does not obviate the need to obtain all other applicable licenses, permits, and approvals required under existing State statutes. A copy of this decision has been sent t~.~the,Corps of Engineers. S.~erel×~, .~ George RtStafford ~ir~tor aivision of CoaStal Resources & Waterfront Revitalization GRS:ak cc: COE/NY District - Mike Infurna NYS DEC/Region I - Robert Greene Town of Southold Trustees - Frank Kujawski, Jr. , x GAJL S. SHAFFER SECRETARY OF STATE STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE /~bANY. N.Y. 12231-0001 .L 1 88 November7, 1988 Mr. Glen Just J.M.O. Consulting Box 361 North Country Road Wading River, NY 11792 Re: F-88-189 U.S. Arnty Corps of Engineers/New York District - Permit Application #88-0349-L2 (Cedar Beach Park Associates) Dear Mr. Just: The Department of State has completed its evaluation of your Federal Consistency Assessment Form and certification that ~ne above proposeo permit activity complies with New York S~ate's approvea Coastal Management Program, and will De conducted in a manner consistent with this program. Pursuant to 15 CFR Section 930.63, and based upon ~ne ~roject information submitted, the Depar~men~ of State concurs with your consistency certification subject to the condition ~nat in order to minimize wa~er quality impacts ~o Cedar Beach Creek ano Little Peconic Bay, dredging shall not take place between the p~riod June I and September 1 of any calender year. This concurrence is without prejudice to, and does not obviate the need obtain all other applicable licenses, permits, and approvals required under existing State statutes. A copy of this decision has GRS:ak CC: 3een sent t~the Corps of Engineers. S~. erely~ .~/ _G~o f~e R/Stafford ~ir~ctor ~ivision of Coastal Resources & Waterfront Revitalization COE/NY District - Mike Infurna NYS DEC/Region I - Robert Greene Town of Southold Trustees - Frank Kujawski, Jr..~- September 12, 1988 Mro Glenn Just JoM.O. Consulting North Country Road Box 361 Wading River, New York 11792 Re: Application No. 621, Cedar Beach Park Association Dear Mr. Just: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during their regular meeting held on August 25, 1988 regarding the above application: Moved by Trustee Krupski seconded by Trustee Bednoski it was RESOLVED that the Town Trustees RESCIND the Significant Environmental Declaration declared on the application submitted by J.M.O. Consulting on behalf of the Cedar Beach Park Association whereas the dredging has been reduced and the remaining dredging is for several property owners. Very truly yours, Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. President Board of Town Trustees FAK:ip cc: Robert A. Greene, D.E.C., Stony Brook Mr. M. Infurna, Army Corps of Engineers Thomas Hart, Coastal Management Conservation Advisory Council, John Holzapfel Planning Board, Bldg. Dept. Michael Corey, NYS Dept. of State j.m.o, consulting box 361 · north country road wading river, n.y. 11792 {S16) 929.~7S te[e~ax {$16) 929o~621 October 1, 1988 Department of the Army New York District, Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch 26 Federal Plaza New York, N.Y. 10278-0090 Attn: Mr. Michael Infurna ~ Public Notice No. 13395-88-0349-L2 Cedar Beach Park Association Dear Mr. Infurna: As per~ your letter of September 21, 1988 (copy enclosed), the following is my responses to those comments your office received with regards to the above noted public notice: 1.) Letter from Sophia Adler to U.S.D.0.A. dated 9/12/88 (copy-enclosed): The project as proposed has been modified to reduce the impact on tidal wetlands. The area to be dredged has been drastically altered (width and depth to be dredged) 1:3 slopes have been proposed and the dredging techniques have been described thoroughly. It should also be pointed out that the objectives of this proposed project were to dredge the channel to an adequate depth for safe navigation, to minimize channel maintenance and to maximize flushing. It is critical in areas such as this to maintain a proper flushing. Areas such as this provide for a mixing of fresh and salt water to create estuarine conditions which produce exceptionally high biological productivity. When an area such as the mouth of Stillwater Lake is open, it also serves to flush any pollutants out Of the Lake area and the channel then-balances~the flushing and mixing benefits so that the highest water quality and biological productivity levels are maintained. This would create a positive effect on these species of fish, shellfish and wildlife which utilize the area. Dredging will not have a "destructive effect" on the ecology of this wetland habitat, nor has it been shown any where by anyone that maintenance dredging has anything to do with the "brown tide". At no time has anyone mentioned that 3 or 4 boat owners have in their minds to moor larger boats. What the applicants want to do is to be able to utilize an existing dredged channel for proper and safe navigation. As far as the "desire to speed back and forth through this little channel", this is an absurd statement which should not even be recognized as a valid comment. 2.) N.F.E.C. to U.S.D.0.A., dated 9/6/88 (copy enclosed): The applicants were the original ones to suggest this and shall utilize the landfill for spoil disposal. 3.) N.F.E.C. to U.S.D.O.A., dated 9/14/88 (copy enclosed): As you know, the Southold Town Trustees have recinded the positive declaration of environmental significance and issued a negative declaration. In keeping with the latest revised plans, there should be no erosion to the existing banks nor should maintenance dredging exacerbate salt and water intrusion. As pointed out under ~1, the plans have been drastically modified to utilize buffer areas, 1:3 slopes and the depths and widths to be dredged have been reduced. 4.) Fred Adler to U.S.D.O.A., dated 8/31/88 (copy enclosed): As stated previously in (!) this should not be the case, it should also be pointed out that although the Adlers do own quite a bit of property in the area adjacent to the channel to be dredged, the figure is nowhere near 90%. Please be advised that I have enclosed site plans which we recently discussed telephone. the revised over the In closing, the should again be brought out that the applicant's are proposing this maintenance dredging pro3ect to assure an adequate depth in the channel for proper and safe navigation, to minimize channel maintenance and to maximize flushing. It should also be kept in mind that the applicant's only want to use the waterway as they've been utilizing it and paying waterfront taxes on it for many years. There are the others, -2- though, who continually preach "do as I say, not as I do." As always, should you or any other member of your staff have any questions or comments with regards to the above noted, kindly contac% %his office at your convenience. Very truly yours, GEJ/te Enc. cc: Joseph B. Hall- N.Y.S.D.E.C. Application No. 10-88-0568 Michael Corey- N.Y.$.D.O.S. Application No. F-88-t89 Southold Town Trustees Applicabion No. 621 POINT DRIVE Suffolk County Hagstrom Map 23 ~ 1" = 3000 · dMD. .S. AL TEIRNIFLORA / ' ~00 -' WA DING DREEC-ED-~,~'~<:~2Y ~HEET RIVER, N.Y. 2850 Cedar Beaeh Rd. Soutl~ld NY I l 0~t~ber 6, 1988 Soul, hold Town Board Southo~ Town T~tees We were encouraged to hear that ~e T,own ~es~inded t~e pe~lt~ fo~ d~cI~ 'a~/or ~a~s across the ~'~o~unlty Be~eh" a~ea on Cedar Bea~ Road. We ~2~eul~ted the attached pet~on to demo~t~a~c t~ many of our local Cedar Beach resldent~ support your position. If you s~d need any of u~ to ~sist ¢ou in an~ mann~ please !ct u~ know. Thank you. '¢ery truly yours, Robert ~, Diane Gazza A PETITION October 2, 1988 To: The Honorable Members of the Southold Town Board and the Southold Town Trustees. Gentlemen. We the undersigned, petition the Town of Southold to consider denying the issuance of any permits for catwalks and/or docks across the property designated as "Community Beach" on Cedar Beach Rd and fronting on Dryads Basin, for the following reasons: 1- We to t 2- 3- We feel the property was intended for all residents of the area Lfishing, etc, without restriction. our belief that structures could be Placed on ~this consent of all residents. ~atwatks and/or docks would cause parking problems and along Cedar Beach Rd. "marina" type of situation in environmentally Name Address Telephone 7/ Page .~Petition against ~walks/dockS on Name ~t Address "Community~each" property. Telephone ,$ECTI~ 5CA LE l¢lO" 0 5 C-C 12' 4REA TO I~E DREDGED _,.S~_~ CA_._L_CU~__T!ON _.520Xl2~1,5 2~ - CY. dM.O. CONSULT ING-'-WA DING SHEE T 2 OF 4 RIVERiN.Y. Applicant proposes to maintenance dredge an existing channel to 9' at MLW. Resultant spoil, approximately ~q~ c.y. of clean sand shall be trucked to an upland site for disposal. pro3ect site is located at "Stillwater Lake Inlet" at Beach, ~ou%hold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, Proposed Cedar New York. Applicant: Purpose: Datum: Locus: 11/10/87 Cedar Beach Park Association, Inc. Maintenance Dredging Mean Low Water Longitude 72~24'/Latitude 41~ ~2' d.M.O. CON~SULT ING-'WA DING .SHEET,.~ OF4 RIVER, N.Y. Operations Division Regulatory Branch DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NEW YORK DISTFIIC~T. CORPS OF ENGINEER8 JACOB K.~J&VIT8 FEDER&L BUILDING . NEW YORK. N.Y. 102T8-0090 SUBJECT: Comments Received in Response to Public Notice No. 13395-88- 0349-L2 by Cedar Beach Park Associates Cedar Beach Park Associates Inc. c/o Glenn E. Just J.M.0. Consulting P. O. Box 361-N. Country Rd. Wading River~ New York~ll?92 .... ~, ! ~ ~_.Dear~Mr. Just: Correspondence expressing concern regarding the ~btic Notice issued .for your proposal llas been received by this office. Copies of these letters are enclosed.' "~ /XXX/~ .These letters contain certain objectives or specific recommendations fromother government~agencies, or other ~.~-~ D~ substantive~adverse comments, which mayresult in denial of the ..... ~- pe!Tmit? Your response to this correspondence is not required. If you wish to respond, please,supply~this office with a resolution or rebuttal to. these objections within 20 days. This will enable us to include.your response in our final permit decision. L~.¢../XXX/ You may voluntarily elect to contact objectors to resolve their objections to your proposal. *~*;~ ,~-. Please contact the andersigned at (212)~64L3912 if you have any questions with regard to this correspondence~-~,~.~- Enclosures Sincerely, l,Infnrna ~¢'~ Project Manager Eastern Permits Section ~ ~ phia Adler ~.. Box 1481 Southold, NY 11971 ~? Atomy Corps of Engineers -- New York District 26 Federal Plaza New York, N.Y. 10278 Sept. 12, 1988 RE: Application # 88-0349-I2 Public Notice # 13395-88-0349-L2 Sirs, In addition to the objections to the proposed Dredging made by my husband Fred Adler, in his letter to you of August 3i, I add the following r~sons for my objection tO dredging the 520 foot long channel that abut~/onr Drooert . This quiet b~ck channel, located at the northwest portion of the group of tidal creeks in Southald that open onto Peconic Bay at Cedar Beach, shelters a wide variety of sea life, including Scallops, Mussels, Clams, Blue-claw crabs smd that sensitive barometer of salt water life, the Fiddler Crab. This waterway also provides food and 'sheltered nesting sites for Mallard'ducks, Merganser ducks~ Egrets, Blue heron and Tree heron, King-fishars and Swans. Dredging will have a destructive effect on the ecology of this wetland habitat, which is already suffering and at risk from the impact of the m~a3~ ~ tide" that has afflicted Peconic Bay for the past few years. The desire of 3 or 4 boat o~mers to moor larger ~ats and to speed beck and forth thru this little channel is a poor reason to inflict ecological damage to th~ natural riches that has flourished here for SO many years. Please reject the Application for Dredging. Sincerely, NFEC e'ORK ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL, Inc. EST. 1972 non.profit organization £or preservation o£ land, sea, air and quality o£ li£e ,PORATE MAILING ADDRESS .O. Box311, So~thold, N.Y. 11971 President: l~x Ronnie ;,~acker Secretary:~~.~J~x M.E. Tomaszcwski MEMBER SERVICE & INFORMATION Route 25 at Love Lane-P.O. Box 799 Mattituck,N.Y. 11952 (516) 298-8880 September 6, 1988 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District Field Office 560 Broad Hollow Road Melville, N.Y. 11747 Dear Sirs: The North Fork Environmental Council supports the reco~uendation of the Southold Town Trustees that the material to be dredged at Stillwater Lake be trucked and placed in the Southold To~rn land- fill in order to preclude any of the fill from returning to the waterway. We appreciate your consideration in this matter. Sincerely yours, Ronnie Wacker President NFEC /ORK EN¥.IRON. ME. NTAL cOuNcIL, 'nc. non-profit organtZat~on for preservation o£ land, sea, air and quality o£ life E~T~. 1972 MEMBER SERVICE & INFORMATION Route 25 at Love Lane - P.O. Box 799 Mattituck, N.Y. 11952 (516) 298-8880 Sept. lk, 1988 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers New York District 26 Federal Plaza New York, N.Y., 10278 Attention: Regulatory Branch Re: Application # 88-0349-L2 Dredging 520 Ft. by 12 ft. wide channel Little Peconic Bay, Southold. at Stillwater Pond, The North Fork Enviror~ental Council, a group which supports environmental planning in Riverhead and Southold, is concerned that dredging this channel 12 feet wide would seriously erode its banks and exacerbate the salt water intrusion already experienced there. We strongly urge that you make no decision on this proposal until the applicant prepares an environmental impact statement which the Southold Town Trustees have determined is necessary. -Sincerely yours, President / / / / / ? US ~Army 'Corps of Engineers New York District 26 Eederal'Plaza New York~ N.Y. 10278 Attn. Regulatory Branch Fred Adler Box 1481 Southold, N.Y., 11971 Aug. 31, 1988 Gentlamen: Re: Public Notice No. 13395-88-0349-L12 I am the homeowener whose property abuts the proposed dredgeing. I take this opportunity to record my strong objection to the applicants proposal to dredge along the canal that abuts my property. The enclosed diagram indicates that approximately 90% of the proposed dredging abuts my property. The spoils intended for removal are a consequence of the erosion of the banks of my property. This accumulated land loss has now resulted in a relatively stabilized situation which is threatened by the proposed dredging. ~a]y further dredging will cause a rapid acceleration of erosion along the banks of my property and a diminishment of the market value of my property. Please reject this proposal. Yours truly, Fred Adler -"~$ Anny Corps of Engineers New York District 26 Federal Plaza New York, N.Y. 10278 Sophia Adler-' Box 1481 Southold, NY 11971 Sept. 12, 1988 RE: Application # 88-03A9-L2 Public Notice # 13395-88-0349-L2 Sirs, In addition to the objections to the proposed Dredging made by my husband Fred Adler, in his letter to you of August 31, I add the following reasons for my objection to dredging the 520 foot long chaone~l _t~h~t~ a~ property. This quiet back channel, located at the northwest portion of the group of tidal creeks in Southold that open onto Peconic Bay at Cedar Beach, shelters a wide variety of sea life, including Scallops, Mussels, Clams, Blue-clew crabs amd that sensitive barometer of salt water life, the Fiddler Crab. This waterway also provides food and sheltered nesting sites for Mallard ducks, Mergamser ducks~ Egrets, Blue heron and Tree heron, King-fishers and Swans. Dredging will have a destructive effect on the ecology of this wetland habitat, which is already suffering and at risk from the impact of the ~ tide" that has afflicted Peconic Bay for the past few years. Tb~ desire of 3 or 4 boat owners to moor larger boats and to speed back and forth thru this little channel is a poor reason to inflict ecological damage to the natural riches that has flourished here for so many y~mrs. Please reject the Application for Dredging. Fred Adler Box 1481 Southold, N.Y., 11971 Aug. 31, 1988 US ArmyCorps of Engineers New York District 26 Federal Plaza New York, N.Y. 10278 Attn. Regulatory Branch Re: Public Notice No. 13395-88-0349-L12 Gentleman: I am the homeowener whose property abuts the proposed dredgeing. I take this opportunity to record my strong objection to the applicants proposal to dredge along the canal that abuts my property. The enclosed diagram indicates that approximately 90% of the proposed dredging abuts my property. The spoils intended for removal are a consequence of the erosion of the banks of my property. This accumulated land loss has now resulted in a relatively stabilized situation which is threatened by the proposed dredging. Any further dredging will cause a rapid acceleration of erosion along the banks of my property and a diminishment of the market value of my property. Please reject this proposal. Yours truly, Fred Adler S 0 0 © ::Fl: } US Army Corps of Engineers New York O,stdct Public Notice n reply ng refer to: Public Notice No, 13395-88-0349-L2 Published:Z8 AUG 88 Expires: 19 SEPT 88 To Whom I[ ~ay Concern= This D±strict has received an application for a Department of the' Army permit pursuant to /_._~ Section 10 of the River and flarbor Act of 1899 (33 U.~.Co 403); ~ Section 404 nf the Clean Wster Act (33 D~S.C. 1344). APPLICANT: Cedar Beach Park ^$sociates, Inc. 255 Lakeside Drive Southold, New York 11971 ACTIVITY: Dredge with 10 year maintenance and upland disposal WATERWAY: Little Peconic Bay LOCATION: Southold, Suffolk County, New York detailed description and plans of the applicant's activity are inclosed assist [n your review. The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the prebable impact Including cumulative impacts of the activity public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the activity must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the activity will be considered £ncluding the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and eccretIon, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food production and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. ALL COM2~ENTS REG~RDING THE PERMIT APPLICATION MUST BE PREPARED iN WRITING AND MAILED TO PEACH THIS OFFICE BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE OF THIS NOTICE, otherwise it will be presumed that there are no objections to the activity. Any person may request, in writing to the district engineer, before this public notice axpires, that a public hearing be held to collect information necessary to consider this application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, the reasons why a public hearing should be held. It should be noted that information submitted by mail is considered just as carefully in the permit decision process and bears the same weight as th at furnished at a public hearing. ND~ FL-129 ~Y 83 CENANOP-RE APPLICAtiON NO. 88-0349-L2 PUB[IC~oT~CE NO 13395-88-0349-L2 DESCRIPTION OF WORK The applicant, Cedar Beach Park Association, Inc., requests Department of the Army authorization to dredge with 10 years maintenance in Stillwater Lake, .Little~ Peconic Bay .at Southold, Town of Southold, Suffolk county, New¥o~k for the state~ purpose.of maintaining adeouate depths for mooring. The work would involve the dredging of a 12 foot wide by 520 fo'ot long channel to a d~pth of 4 feet below mean low water, removing approximately 347 cubfa~ ~a~ds' of material. The applicant anticipates dredging three times, during, the.life of the permit, removing approximately 347 cubic yards per Jvent. All dredged material would be placed in an upland site~, where it would be suitably retained from reentering the waterway. / /09 0~' q 0 GAlL S. SHAfFER SECRETARY OF STATe Mr. Glenn Just J.M.O. Consulting North Country Road Box 361 Wading River, NY 11792 STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE ALbaNY, N.Y. 12231 -O001 August 22, 1988 F-88-189 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/New York District Permit Application - #88-0~9-L2 Cedar Beach Park Association, Inc. Town of Southold Request for Additional Information Dear Mr. Just: Pursuant to 15 CFR 930.58, the following data and information is necessary to enable the Department of State to adequately assess the coastal zone effects of this proposed project. 1) I understand that the Southold Town Trustees have recently issued a positive declaration of environmental significance for this project, end that a DEIS must be prepared. However, I believethis declaration was based on the original, more extensive proposal rather than on the present revised proposal. PIease provide clarificationas to the SEQRA status of the project. Will an ElS indeed be required? If so, please submit copies of the draft and final EIS's. 2) As you stated in your letter of July 15, 1988, the project is located to the west of the Cedar Beach Point significant coastal fish and wildlife habitat boundary. However, the eastern end of the dredging channel is adjacent to the habitat boundary. Because of the closeness of the project to thedesignated habitat, dredging activities may have an adverse impact on.~w~ater qual%ty~ in Cedar Beach Creek. What ~p~ec~-~on~ ~_he~mken d~_~_~g ~he ~tred i~nd dispos~ ~ons that will minimize o~ prevent potential water quality pro D~ms?-. - M~. ~ust Page Please provide the information requested above to the Department of State within thirty days from the date of this letter. Pursuant to t5 CFR 93G. 6~(d), if this.necessary data and information is not provided~.the Departmentof State may object to your consistency certification on the grounds of insufficient information. Any additional information which you believe will facilitate cur consistency review of thisproject would be appreciated. A copy of this letter has ~een sent to the U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers. Please call me at (518) ~7~-36~2 if you have any questions. Michael Corey Senior Environmental Analyst MC:ng cc: COE/NY District .... Michael Infurna N¥S DEC/Region 1 -Robert Greene / Town of Southold Trustees - Frank Kujawski, Jr N. COUNTRY RD. es BOX 361 WADING RIVER, N.Y. 11792 (5!6) 929-3575 July 25, 1988 Board of Town Trustees Town Of SOuthold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Attn: Mr. Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. Re: Wetlands Application No. 621, Cedar Beach Park Association Dear Mr. Kujawski: As per our discussion at the June Trustee's work session, please be advised that we revised the proposed dredging plan as follows: 1.) The applicant's propose to dredge a 520'x 12' area to a depth of 3' at MLW. The existing depth is 1.5' at MLW. With this, approximately 346 c.y. of sand is proposed to be dredged and trucked bo the Southold Town Landfill for disposal. 2.) I have encl3sed 6 copies of the revised site plan and section views which depict the above. As always, should you or any other member of Trustees have any comments or questions with matter, please do not hesitate in contacting the Board of regards to this this office. Thank you for your continued cooperation. Sincerely, Glenn E. Just GEJ/te Enc. ?50'¥0 C£D,4~ ~' PC tNT Dt~IV~ ~ Suffolk County 'strom Map 23 ~le 1'~ = 3000 / ® / SECTION AREA TO IF~ /~ DREDC~D-~Y S_. .A, L TERNI~LORA U.M.O. CON,SUL T ING-- WA DING '~HEET I OF 4 R I VER, N.Y. SE. cTLQN _ VIEW 5CA LE !~10" 0 $ 10 C-C 60/ 12" ~REA TO !~E DREDGED --~C~:~_ . IL_ffALCULATICN 2,~ -- 346.6,z QK dM.O. COMSULT ING'-'WA DiNG 5HEET 2OF4 R I VER~ N.Y. N. COUNTRY RD. · BOX 361 WADING RIVER, N.Y. 11792 (516) 929-3575 June 16, 1988 Southold Town Trustees P.O. Box 728 53095 Main Road Southold~ N.Y. 11971 Attn: Mrs. Ilene Pfifferling Re: Cedar Beach Park Association Application No. 621 Dear Mrs Pfifferling: Please be advised that we are no longer to dispose of the proposed dredge spoil ag the previously mentioned site. Plans are now being made to dispose of the spoil at the Soughold Town Landfill. If you or any other member of the Board of Trustees have any questions or comments with regards to this matter, kindly contact this office at your convenience. . Very truly yours, GEJ/te MOORE & MOORE ATTORNEYS AT L~W Southold Town Trusbees Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 June 9, 1988 Re: Dredging Permit Applications/Cedar Beach,Southold Dear Town Trustees: We represent Mr. Theodore Laoudis who is the project sponsor of the proposed subdivision Known as Angel Shores. Mr. Laoudis has elected not to allow his property co be used for the deposit of spoils from the dredging proposed by the Cedar Beach property owners. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. WDM/er cc: Theodore Laoudis Henderson & Bodwell Southold Town Planning Board Glenn Just DocId:060988.11 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS & PLANNERS June 6, 1988 Mr. Bennett 0rlowski Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Angel Shores Spoils Deposition Dear Ben, As per Val's request, we have reviewed the application before the Board of Trustees to deposit spoiI on a portion of the site of the proposed Angel Shores subdivision. We find that the Planning Board should be an involved agency under SEQR for this action. We also recommend that the Board express its concern to the Trustees that although the project (dredge spoil deposition) is unlisted under SEQR, it would likely have a significant adverse environmental impact, and that a Positive Declaration should be issued by the Board of Trustees. I have relayed this information to Val and Melissa on have prepared a draft reply to the Trustees, attached. contact us if you need further information. 6 June and Please Sincerely, SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES, David J.S. Emilita Principal Planner INC. DJSE/kb Enclosure %23~.3~s~/~Z~e. :gmestown I[ 02835 423-0430 June 6, 1988 Mr. Prank A. Kujawski Board of Trustees David J.S. Emilita RE: Application 9 621 Cedar Beach Park We are writing to inform you that the pending application before the Trustees which includes spoils deposition on land of Theodore Laoudes requires coordination with another project by Mr. Laoudes on this same site. The other protect, "Angel Shores", comprises some 29 building lots and 19.5 a acre open space reserve. It is also the subject of a pending EIS, which has been scoped but which has not included a spoils deposition option. Thus, while the Planning Board is Lead Agency on "Angel Shores", it wishes to be an Involved Agency on Application 621. The case vice versa would also be appropriate in our view. In its role as an Involved Agency, the Planning Board requests that the action before you, although unlisted under SEQR, is likely to have a significant adverse environmental impact, and that a Positive Declaration be prepared by your Board. We trust this information has been conveyed to you in time for your meeting of June 8. We are available for assistance at any time. Bennett Orlowski INSPECTION CHECK OFF SHEET In accordance with Chapter 97, Article II, Section 97-28 ~t~e TrUstees may 'adopt a resolution directing the issuance of a permit to perform operations applied for only if it determines that such operations will not substantially: Adversely affect the wetlands of the Town. Cause damage from erosion, turbidity or siltation. Cause saltwater intrusion into the fresh water resources of the town. Adversely affect-fish, shellfish or other beneficial marin organisams, aquatic wildlife and vegetation or the natural habitat thereof. Increase the danger of flood and storm-tide damage. Adversely affect navigation on tidal waters or the Tidal flow of the tidal waters of the town. Change the course of any channel or the natural movement or flow of any waters. Weaken or undermine the lateral support of other lands in the vicinity. Otherwise adversely affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town. C.A.C. approval: ---~~--- .......... D.E.C. approval: .................... ARMY CORPS: ...................... Z.B.A.: ............................ CEA: .............................. PUBLIC NOTICE: ................... FLOOD PLAIN: ...................... N. COUNTRY RD. · BOX 361 WADING RIVER, N.Y. 11792 (516) 929-3575 Town of Sout~old Town #~ll, 53095 ~cn P.O. Box 728 SouthoZd, ~.]. //97/ dttn: ~. Fran~ d. Kudaw~kL, ~r., Re: d?pZLcatLon ~o. ~27, Ceda~ Beach Par~ d~oc. ~t per gout letter o£ d~rCl 27, /988 (co~u enclo~edJ, encZo~ed £iea~e ~£nd one co?j o~t~e ~ub-dLvc~con oian [or £edar Beach ~o~kCn} ~LtkL~ ~k~ con'{Ln~ of tk~ ~Lte. fir. tatk~'~ ? 6~r~¢ ~ ~ ~t~ cont~Ln~r o~ ~¢~ wkL~k can ko~d ~pprox. dL~po~aZ ~Lt~ ~kL~k L~ d~rL~d ~ foL~o~: ~?prox. ~0-~0 BayvL~w ~oad, $un~t L~n~ IP~conL¢ L~n~) and Cedar 9oLn~ ~. I haw ~nc~o~d ~ cop~ o[ a Su[~o~fi £o.nty Tax bap ~hLck ~n~oadLn~ ~Lt~ and L~ ~urr~n~ o~ by br. Iheodor~ ~o~ who h~ ~ranl~d hL~ ?~r~L~Lon [or ~ ~polZ to ?lea~e ao not ~z~Ltate Ln con~ac~Ln~ m~. ./ CED~ ~ BEACH PA~oX{ ASS0~IATION, '~:~ P.O~ BOX 394 Southold, New York, 11971 April 7, 1988 Mr. Frank Murphy, Supervisor Southold Town Council Main Road SouthOld, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Murphy: Once again the members of the Cedar Beach Park Association wish to extend our thanks to you and the entire council for the maintenance program at Cedar Beach Inlet over the past few years. The modest cost of a drag bucket for a day or two to open the neck has created absolutely no discernible environ- mental disturbance. Instead, it has kept the inlet navi- gable for small pleasure craft, and more importantly has allowed a generous tidal flush re~ulting in an ecologically clean basin. We gratefully view this as the council's expression of concern For the residents of the Park, who after all, re- ceive none of'the standard community services such as road maintenance, snow plowing, street lighting, poli~epatrol, etc. We sincerely hope the program will continue. Sincerely yours, CEDA~ BEACH PARE ASSOCIATION, INC. Frank P. Francia, P.E. BOard of I~i~to~s P.S. I am enclosing a small drawing showing an area of the neck which feeds~Fairhaven Inlet. Some of our members have advised me that some shoaling has occurred there, and they hope the drag bucket could reach it. FPF:r£ c.c. Ruth Oliva George Penny John Bredemeyer Frank KuJawski CED~ BEACH P~RKASSOCIATION, 2. P.O. Box 394 Sou,hold, New York, 11971 April 7, 1988 Mr. Frank Murphy, Supervisor Sou,hold Town Council Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Murphy: Once again the members of the Cedar Beach Park Association wish to extend our thanks to you and the entire council for thc maintenance program at Cedar Beach Inlet over the past few years. The modest cost of a drag bucket for a day or two to open the neck has created absolutely no discernible environ- mental disturbance. Instead, it has kept the inlet navi- gable for Small pleasure craft, and more importantly has allowed a generous tidal flush re~ulting in an ecologically clean basin. We gratefully view this as the council's expression of Concern for the residents of the Park, who after all, re- ceiv~ none of the standard community services such as road maintenance, snow plowing, street lighting, poli~epatrol, etc. We sincerely hope the program will continue. Sincerely yours, PtS. CEDA~ BEACH PARK ASSOCIATION, INC. Frank P. Franc,a, P.E. Board of I am enclosing a~small drawing showing an area of the neck which feeds 'Fairhaven Inlet. Some of our members have advised me that some shoaling has occurred there, and they hope the drag bucket could reach it. FPF:rf c.c. Ruth Oliva George Penny John Bredemeyer Frank KuJawski FRANCISJ. MURPHY SUPERV~OR TELEPHONE (5i$)7~-1800 OFFICE OF THE SUPERVISOR TOWN OF $OUTHOLD TOWN HALL, 53095 MAIN ROAD P.0~ BOX t179 $OUTHOLD. NEW YORK 11971 TO: FROM: QATE: SUBJECT: Elten Larsen, Councilwoman Francis J. Murphy, SuperviSor Marck 15, 1988 CEDAR BEACH HARBOR/FAIP35AVEN INLET DREDGING Please find the attached letter from regarding the above subject. Mr. I would appreciate your checking with the Trustees and John Guldi and finding out if what Mr. Alessi states is true% Please submit your comments back to me, so I may reply b~ck to Mr. ~Alessi. Thank you for your cooperation. Attachment (1) FJM:cms ~r~ Frank ~urphy Town Hall of Sodth01d ~ain Road Southold, Ne York ll9~l Dear ~ir. ~urphy, February 29~1988 At the request of Cedar Beach P~rk Association~, I am . The concern is that each time the mouth ofthe inlet at' ~ -- Cedar Beach ~arbor is newly dredged, t~e force of the curr~nt of the tide sweeps the deposit into the mouth of our immediate inlet which is F~irhaven Inlet. Enclosed is a copy of a sur~ey with a red X marking the problem spom. If ~r. Latham, who we believe does the annual dredging, could possibly scoop a couple of baskets of sand ou~ of the mouth of Fairhaven Inlet he would then again make it navagatable at low tide. Since we rarely ask for additzonal services throughout the year, your permission for this request would be greatly appreciav ed. If there is any further need to contact a~yone regarding this matter, kindly call ~r. Frank Francia at 765-3162 and he will be able to con~act me. Sincerely, Leo Ales~i BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTItOLD 53095 Main Road Phone 765-1892 Southola, ~N. Y. 11971 - _19 -- BOARD OF BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, $3095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southol~., New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE TOWN TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT PURSUANT TO THE LAWS, ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE COASTAL AND INTERIOR WETLANDS, FLOOD PLAINS AND DRAINAGE AREAS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, AND THE ISSUANCS OF PERMITS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3Z OF THE CODES OF THE TOWN OF $OUTHOLD. APPKICATiON NO,__~' ~ ~ DATE OF APPLICATION Fe__.~r__..~ar~~_~ ?65-3856 IDENTITY OF APP~iCANT Cedar Beach Pa__rk ~s__ociatio.n, Inc. PHONE NO_. ADDRESS OF APPLICANT C/O 255 Lakeside Drive, Southold, N.Y. 11971 TAX MAP NO. please see attached AGENT Glenn E. Just of J.M.0. Conskt__t~ng PERMIT RSQUESTSD TO please see attached 929-3575 PHONE NO._ LOCATION OF PROPERTY FOR WHICH pERMIT WANTED L~keside Drive, Southold HOME ADDRESS OF PERMIT APPLICANT IF DIFFERENT ~ROM AFORESAID LOCATION_. SIZE OF PROPOSED WORK LENGTH 525' FRONTING PROPERTY_~.~V L=k~ --_E=a~ B~oh ~iarbo! WIDTH H~iGHT ABOVE HIGH 525'x 10'x-~.5' DEPTH BELOW ~OW WATER To be dredged %o 4' at MLW YARDS TO BE E:I[CAVATED Approximately 1025 c.y. YARDS TO SE F WIDTH OF CANAL, CREEK OR BAy FRONTING PROPERTY 6'0' DEPTH AT I. OS. T AVERAGE RISE IN TIDE 2' DISTANCE TO THE NEAREST CHANNEL 20 DISTANGE PROJECT EXTENDS SEYOND SIMILAR PROJECTS IS THIS FOR PRIVATE OR BUSINESS USE?___ Private AREA ZONING Residential IN THE AREA 0 F'T MANNER IN WHICH clam shell MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY____~_~___ DESCRIBE ANY KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON THE Site has been previously dredged Crane Wlbh PREMISE AND WHETHER ANY PRIOR LICENSE OR PERMITS HAVE SEEN ISSUED TO ERRECT STRUCTURES OR TO DREDGE OR DEPOSIT FILL ON SAID PREMISES AND WHETHER ANY PERMITS OR LICENSES WERE EVER SUSPENDED OR REVOKED BY A GOVERNMENTA AGENGY__~O~e tO my ~le~e.~_ DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION AND PROPOSED CONDITION OF THE PREMISES AFTER THE WORK IS COMPLETED INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL SURVEy OF THE PROJECT SITE IF NECESSARY NO rehabilitation should be necessary WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTy, IF NOT THE SAME AS THE ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED THAT WOULD PROHIBIT THIS PROJECT? no 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner· whether a project e question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frecluent- project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting nificance. full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination s has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. ents: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides oblective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data. it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. I eotif, l~formation. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions , the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part q [] Part 2 •Part 3 of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and. therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the enwronment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, z~C therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* · The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency litle of Responsible Officer Jrija~ or Type Name of I~e~1~ops ble Off'er in Lead Agency 1 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor ~OTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may ha;c a significant effect ~n the environment. Please complete the entire form Parts A through E Answers to these quest ons w be considere-' Is part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verifi~:ati0n and public review. Provide any additiona. information you bel eve wi I be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3 tt is expected that completion of the ful EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve hew studies, research or investigation. If information requiring suc-h additional work is unavailable so indicate and specify ~ h eac instance. NAME OF AC~ON LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address. MuniciDslity and ~unty) Drive, Southold, Suffolk NAME OF APPUCANT~NSOR GlennE. Just of J.M.0. Consultinq ADDRESS'p.O. Box 361-N. Country Rd. BUSINESS TELEPHONE ; 516) -929-3575 CITY/PO I STATE I ZiPCODE River, N.Y. 11792 NAME OF OWNER (If dlffer~ IBUSiNESS TEtEPHONE Glenn E. Just for the Cedar Beach Association, In~.~16 )365-3856 ADDRESS C/o 255 Lakeside Drive CiTY/PO I STATE ZiP CODE Southold, N.Y. 11971 ACTION Applicant proposes bo maintenance dredge an existing channel to 4' at MLW. Resultant spoil (approximately[~ c.y. of clean sand) shall be trucked to an upland disposal site. Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable Site Description setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: r-lUrban []Industrial []Commercial ~Residential [suburban) []Forest []Agriculture ~Other Total acreage of project area: n/a acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland [Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural [includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24. 25 o(ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other [Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? sand a. Soil drainage: f~/Vell drained 1 f)C] % of site []Moderately well drained % of site ~Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the N' Land Classification System? acres. (See I NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? r-tyes a. What is depth to bedrock.; (in feet) E]Rural [non-farm) 5.: Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 1~10-10% 10 0 % O10-15 % % i-115% or greater ~. % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to. or contain a building, site. or district, listed on'the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? C]Yes 7. Is project substantially conttguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? i-lYes t~No O. What is the depth of the water table? n/a (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ~]Yes ~l~lo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? :[~fes I-]No' 11 Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? l-lYes ~No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any umque or unusual land forms on the prolect site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) I-lyes ~l:No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? [DYes r~No If yes, explain utilized for do~.kinq 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? [DYes ~Sh~o unknown 15. Streams within or conhguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16, Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a Name~-.~ 11w~*.~r T,~lc~ - C'~r~r ~r,~ T~-~rbl Size (In acres) n,/a 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? I~Yes a) if Yes. does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? I--lYes ~No b) If Yes, will ~mprovements be necessary to allow connection? ~Yes ~No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law. Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? i-lYes 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL. and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~lYes :~1o 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? C1Yes ~1o N/A B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlle~ by pro~ect sponsor b Proiect acreage to be developed: acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing : proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; I. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? __ ft. 3 acres ultimately. (upon completion of project)? Multiple Family Condominium length, :~. How much natural material (i.e, rock, earth, etc.] will be remov~t from the site? "~ ..... ~_ . ~ ~tons 3. Will distorbed areas be reclaimed? r-Wes DNo ~fqlA a. If yes. for what intend , purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? i-lyes DNo c. Will upper subsoil be stock piled for reclamation? DYes [-INo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0> 1 acres. 5. Will any'mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important, vegetation be removed by this project? r-lyes ~o 6. If single phas& project: Anticipated i~eriod of construction 1 months. (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 1 b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase (number). ASA]? monrn year, (including demolition). month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? i--lYes DNo 8. Will blasting occur during construction? []Yes '~o 9. Number of jobs generated during construction 4~ ; after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? DYes ~No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? -lYes ~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industriaL, etc.) and amount b, Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes ho Type t4. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain DYes /~4o 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ~Yes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? DYes JZ~No a. If yes. what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? DYes DNo c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disoosal system or inte a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain r'lNo DYes I-1No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste.~ a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? i-iYes DYes ~No tons/month. years. 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? [)-lyes No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? DYes 21. Will pro~ect result in an ~ncrease in energy use? C1Yes ~No If yes . indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity n/a gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day zL/~ gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? I-lYes ~o If Yes. explain /~]No City. Town. Village Board [:]Yes '~o City, Town, Village Planning Board []Yes City, Town Zoning Board I--lyes City, County Health Department [:]Yes Other Local Agencies ~es -1No Other Regional Agencies C]Yes State Agencies ~-?es (No Federal Agencies I~es rqNo Submittal Type Date Town Trustees (Southold) 11/87 N.¥.,q.D.F..C. & N.¥.~q.D.O.,q. ll/R7 U.S.D.O.A. 11/87 C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? i-lYes ~No If Yes. indicate decision required: I-lzoning amendment I-izoning variance [-Ispecial use permit Dsubdivision I-Isite plan ;-Inew/rewsion of master plan I-Iresource management plan C'lo~her N/A 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? 3. What i~ the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. What is the max(mum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses ~n adopted local land use plans? ["]Yes 7. What are the predominant land use(s] and zoning classifications within a 1/, mile radius of proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '4 mile? i-lyes CtNo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land. how many lots are proposed? a What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? I-lyes [-tNo 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? i-lYes [-INo a. If yes, ~s existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? i-lYes [:]No 12, Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? FqYes C=]No a. f yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? i-lYes I-INo D. Intormational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your projecL If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. ApplicantJSpons0r/~n~./. ~ /J_ ~/~G19n~% E. ~Just of J.M.0. Consul%inq Date 11/12/87 Signature I! the action is in the Coastal Area,L-'/.and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessmenl Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 Part 2 PROJECT IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information {Read Carefully) · In completing the form the rewewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large {column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But. for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The im pacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question · n identifying mmpacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box {column I or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? [Z]NO E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, {15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. ~ Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within i'/~ 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will continue for more than I year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ~ ay. .j) Construction in a designated floodw Other impacts ~j~ji ~q~,~-" 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? Ii.e, cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)rqNO [~YES · Specific land forms: .tj~6~x~ ~ 6 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] [] 2 3 Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigated By Impact Project Change [] []Yes I-]No [] []Yes [:]No [] J-]Yes []No [] I-lYes ~lNo [~ []Yes I-]No [] []Yes []No [] [] Yes [] No [] []Yes E]No [] []Yes []No [] []Yes []No I 2 3 Small to Potential Can impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By impact impact Project Change [] ~ -~es [-INo [] ,~' []Yes []No r~ [] [] []Yes []No [] ,,~ ~Yes E]No ~ ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~D ~ ~ ~Yes ~No (~ ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~ ~Yes ~No f~ ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~es ~ ~ ~ D ~Yes ~No ~ ~ D ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No iMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? {Under Articles 15.24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) E]NO ~E$ Examples that would apl~ly to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ~ · Construction in a desighated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existi.ng 9r new body of water? ~O E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of an'/body of water~,~ or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ri · Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. E]NO ,~ES · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not tj have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires'water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which pres do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemica!~I products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may requ re new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other impacts: 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or su~rf~ce water runoff? I-1NO Ii, YE S Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns, · proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway, · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR' 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? / EiNO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 / · Proposed .Action will induce 1,000 or mor~ehicle trips in any given hour. i~ner · Proposed Action will result in the ation of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. / · Emissmn rate of total contam~ants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing mor~han 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allo/an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. ~ · · Proposed action .w/Ri' a!lo~, a~ increase in the density of industrial development wi~in exist'm~ industrial areas. · Other impaq: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8, Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ~I'~10 BYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list. using [he site, over or near site or found on the site, · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: 9, Wil Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or ~ / non-endangered species? ONORES Examples that would apply to column 2 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] []Yes E]No [] ~/ ~es E]No O ~Yes gNo ~ ~ gYes gNo ~ ~ ~Yes ~No g ~ gYes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ g ~Yes ~No g ~ ~Yes ~No ~ g ~Yes ~No ~ ~ gYes ~No g g ~Yes gNo 0 g ~Yes ~No ~ 0 OYes · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action reqmres the removal of more than 10 acre~ of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally importar~ vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Prop6se~J Action affect agricultural land re~J4~es.~ OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land [includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.$ acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural larjd management systems (e.8., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures [e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES. ~ 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ,,~O [~YES (if necessary, use the Visual FAF Addendum in"Sec'tion 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result ih the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure ~of ~stor c pre- historic or paleontological importance? ~NO .CIYES Examples that would apply to column 2 ~' \ · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site nventory. · Other ~mpacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities.~ ~ES Examples that would apply to column 2 ~]NO · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ~'. A major reductio~ of an open im?ortant to the community. ~ Other impacts: ~ space 9 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] I--lYes [] [] I-lyes I--INo [] [] ~lYes ' I-]No [] [] (-lYes I-]No [] [] ['-[Yes [~]No [] [] I'qYes [~No [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ' ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~xes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No '~ ~ ' ~Yes ~No 0 ~ ~ ~Y~s ~No ~ ~ :i DYes ~No IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action ~ffect the community's sou~*of fuel or energy supply? ~O ~]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action wil cause a greater than 5% i~crease in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a~res//~lt~ of the Proposed Action? ONO ,,,~ES Examples that w. ould apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1.500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per da'/). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · PropOsed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. ~/ill Proposed Action affect public health and safe~/~ [DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.l in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or em msion. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form [i.e. toxic, pmsonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or, more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liqu. ids. · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous . waste ?. Other .impacts: 10 © Small to Potential Moderate Large Impact Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change E]Yes [~No OYes FiNo OYes' E]No E]Yes E]No E]Yes ~lNo OYes [~]No ~]Yes ~lNo I--lYes I-]No ~lYes l~No E]Yes ONo FIYes F-INo ~Yes ~lNo [~]Yes FJNo OYes [-JNo OYes F1N0 OYes [-JNo IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR'NEIGHBORHOOD \, ~- 18. Wi] proposedactionaffectthecharacteroftheexistingcomj~ · Examples that would apply to column 2 ~ · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating serwces will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic ~mportance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employmenL. · Other impacts: 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change ,~ [] []Yes CINo [] [] []Yes r-INo [] []Yes []No [] DYes []No [] []Yes []No [] [] r-lyes '[]No [] [] []Yes []No' [] [] []Yes []No [] [] DYes •No 19. Is there, or is there likel,, to he. public controversy rela~d/,t'o potential adverse envlronr~ ental im pacts? fqNO /~'ES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Iden dried as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is c~nsidered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Col ~mn 2 of Part 2: I Briefly describe the impact. 2 Describe (if applicablel how the impact could be mitig~ ted or reduced to a sinai to moderate impact by p[oject change(s). 3 Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently Iosi resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. · (Continue on attachments) 11 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK ) )SS: BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND SAYS THAT HE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE.ABOVE DESCRIBED pERMITS, In completing this application t hereby authorize the Trustees. agent'br repres~ntatzve to enter onto ~y,~property to.inspect the premises in conjunction with review~/~is~pp~ica~i~n. SWORN TO BEFORE MI; THIS NOTAt~.Y PUBL CHARLES W; BOWMAN [~DTAR¥ PUBLIC, Sla~e of Hew Ho. 4668958, Suffolk Coum~ Commission Expire~, APPROVED "WETLANDS" PERMIT (CHAPTER 97) APPROVED "BOAT,DOCKS, WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER 32) (CHAPTER 32) COMPUTATION OF FEEB Approved 2/27/85 PECONIC 11958 0 EAST HOG NECK BAY :HOGUE LITTLE HOG NECK NASSAU POINT JESSUP NECK FOR ADJOINING AREA SEE MAP NO. 24. 6'1 POINT Suffolk County Hagstrom Map 23 1" = 3000 ' /~/ e / / ~ dM.O. C - . ON~ULTING. WA DING 'RIVER, N.~ SECTION VIEW 0 .5 10 60x ~,t~.E,~_~TO..BE. DREDGED ,,1~]~:7- SHEET 2 OF4 d.M.O. CONS ULTING"WA DING RIVER~ N.Y. Applicant proposes to 4' at MLW. Resultant sand shall be trucked maintenance dredge an existing channel to spoil, approximately 10~5 c.y. of clean to an upland site for disposal. Proposed project site is Beach, ~outhold, located at "Stiltwater Lake Inlet" at Cedar Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, New York. Applicant: Purpose: Datum: Locus: 11/10/87 Cedar Beach Park Association, Inc. Maintenance Dredging Mean Low Water Longitude 72o24,/Latitude 4~02' d.M.O. CON,SULT ING-'WA DING ~SHEET. RIVER, N.Y. NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY OWNERS PROPOSED PROJECT SITE ADJACENT TO 2. 3. 4. 5. 7. 8. 9. 12.) 14.) 15.) Ernest Poppas, Cedar Point Drive, Southold, N.Y. ,11971 Fred Adler, Lakeside Drive, Southold, N.Y. 11971 Alexander Williams III, 160 Henry Street, Brooklyn, N.Y. GeorGe DeLisle, Lakeside Drive, Southold, N.Y. 11971 Albert Profy, 255 Lakeside Drive, Southold, N.Y. 11971 Albert Murray, 345 Lakeside Drive, Southold, N.Y. 11971 Fred Adler, Lakeside Drive, Southold, N.Y. lf971 John Lee, Lakeside Drive, Southold, N.Y. 11971 James Schill, Lakeside Drive, Southold, N.Y. 11971 James Schill, Lakeside Drive, Southold, N.Y. 11971 Louis Weiss, Seawood Drive, Southold, N.Y. 11971 RoGer Cornell, Lakeside Drive, Southold, N.Y. 11971 Ernest Schneider, 915 Lakeside Drive, Southold, N.Y. 11971 Ernest Schneider, 915 Lakeside Drive, Southold, N.Y. 11971 Fred Adler, Lakeside Drive, Southold, N.Y. 11971 1120 SHEET OF dM.O. CON,SULTING"'WADiNG RIVER, N.Y. ' °o .00C ~' L~ / o~_~