Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-4153 /ice £.�te�. . r Board Of Southold Town Trustees kr� SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK I PERMIT NO. 41.5.3 DATE: .....4129193 } f f ISSUED TO ...:..TfFQMAS..W .. BU:CKNER ....... .......loo .. r Pursuant to the ,provisions of Chapter 615 of the Laws of ` 4'` ' the State of New York,;1893; and Chapter 404 of the Laws of the ' State of New York 1952; and the Southold Town Ordinance en- �r titled "REGULATING AND THE PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS w' IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and the € i REMOVAL OF SAND, GRAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM j LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;" and in accordance with the r Resolution of The Board adopted at a meeting held on 4/29 t' 19 93:, and in consideration of the sum of $.150.9.0 paid by 1 *" J.M .O. Cnxisultin � * for Thomas W. ..Buckn..er... _........:...... ` ' of Fishers Island N. Y. and subject to the __ Terms and Conditions listed on the reverse side hereof, of Southold Town Trustees authorizes and permits the following: u a, To construct 2 one-family additions and deck onto re-exists ,.; Y P single family dwelling ling and relocate existing septic tank. z' all in accordance with the detailed specifications as presented in I� s ... the originating application. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees here,- . \\\ by causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date. i z 'M1 A01 � Trustees ; ....Gi:,�.:rv�,..�.�W:..W..x,!.+.L`:s•'`.i,..dvs x._�+ r s: �:� �v...� <s._.:n'.-s+.r'�.sw;�' ' .v r i TRUSTEES ©gUFFa ,� SUPERVISOR John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Off' �'pG SCOTT L.HARRIS Albert J. Krupski,Jr,Vice Presidedll- _ Henry R mith y "� Town Hall John B. Tuthill 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson y �� EO. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765=1892 �Ol #ta0 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516)765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES w TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COASTAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PERMIT May 13, 1993 Permit Number: 4153 Name of Applicant/Agent: J.M.O. Consulting Name of Permittee: Thomas W. Buckner Address of Permittee: P.O. Box 250, Old Lyme Ct. 06371-0250 Property Located: Private Rd. , Fishers Island NY DESCRIPTION OF' ACTIVITY: To construct 2 one-story additions and deck onto- pre-existing single family dwelling and relocate existing septic tank. Date of permit issuance: April 29, 1993 This permit is valid for a period of two years from the date of issuance. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: NA Bluff restoration through a re-vegetation agreement is attached hereto ,and is a necessary special condition of this permit. NA A relocation agreement is attached hereto and is a necessary special condition of this permit. XXX—A maintenance agreement is attached hereto and is a cessary special condition of this permit. John M Bredemeyer, III President, Board Of Trustees TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III, President SUPERVISOR Albert J. Krupski,Jr., Vice President •:. a SCOTT L.HARRIS Henry P. Smith John B.'Tuthillyz'w Town Hall a William G. Albertson �� �®� 53095 Main Road . � P.O. Box .1179 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Southold, New York 11971 Fax(516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COASTAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION TOWN WETLANDS PERMIT APPLICATION TRUSTEE LANDS PERMIT APPLICATION urtice Use only: hACoastal Erosion Permit Application - Wetland Permit Application t Waiver from Chapter 97m );. Trustee Lands Permit Application ri Grandfather FBI ,f Completed Agps. ""1 �� ( Q 1R� CAC comments-Date: Sent / ec. #hhll ilrWariance Required, R ( ' 17 Neighbors notified Date: WN 01 P ;? SEQRA Type tlL4l3 fi✓ 454 k oord. Review-ogt� an sP. comp./date: cwt( cvfs31/SPGt Date Rec. by Office ��EEQRA Determin./date: s � 1/Public Hearing/date: (t' Findings: ] Permit Vote: (YIN): IVA s (dt Special Conditions: ` (also see file) Application Fee: S 15@ n r Application Number; SCTM #1000- o_ Project Name (If any) CSS. 5�n Date Prepared: ( ®� Applicant: k, ! )Q nQS JAI, UC nP(- Address: �$ s � � d.4 'moi ikQLR— f !f (l -7- Phone ( /6 ' +fl Interest: (owner, consultant,lessee,etc. ) /:n jj Owner of Property: j( i0 €€€ Address tCA0 - Phon ,)6203 ) Subject Propertty� Location: ��ielre�P rOrw� p Tcl�vr (Provide LILC4 Pole #, Distance to cross Streets if not on �i " location map) sI x _ Page l Yds. to be excavated: r— Yds. to be filled:_ E�1 Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Width of canal, creek or bay fronting property: € tib Depth at low tide: n c` Aver. rise in tide: ac" Distance to nearest channel: nlo� Distanc project extends beyond similar projects in area: Area -tonin : _ T zoning: —JZ—Q0 Land r area ' rn Is project for acres: .c .private or business use: Intended use of property: S r� Describe known prior operation ` u: cte premis s: EC�ty. S V 1 nas any prior license or permit been issued to erect structures, dredge, or deposit fill on said premises: UJ--) Has any license or permit ever been revoked or suspended by a_ Governmental Agency: Project Description The project description must also include plans for reclamation of land disturbed during construction of the principle and accessory structures and underground structures (i.e. , pipeline and septic system; make additional attachments if necessary) . Authorization (Where the applicant is not the owner) I residing at (Print-owner of subject property) (Marling address-phone) do hereby authorize to apply for Coastal Erosion permrt(s) from the Southold Town Trustees Signature THIS IS NOT A PERMIT Page 2 J.M.O. CONSUtTINC, p.o. box 447 QU(3c.JYlg, N+,y. 1195' - (516) 65 -060 # c� U To - OF of Project Decription Applicant proposes to construct two one story additions , andci. deck onto a pre-existing single family dwelling and to relocate an existingseptic tank. The western addition shall be located 77 ' landward of the Tidal Wetlands Line as located by J.M.O . Consulting (G. Just ) on 1/7/93 and 77 ' landward of the "Limit of Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Per Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Map 46-F. I . of 49 . The relocated septic tank shall be located 114 ' landward of the Tidal Wetlands Line as located by J.M.O. Consulting (G. Just) on 1/7/93 and in excess of 95 ' of the "Limit of Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Per Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Map 46F. I. of 49 . The eastern addition shall be located greater than 100 ' landward of the Tidal Wetlands Line as located by J.M.O. Consulting (G. Just ) on 1/7/93 , greater than 80 ' landward of the "Limit of Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Per Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Map 46-F. I. of 49 and 27 ' landward of an area of Freshwater Wetlands as located by the N.Y. S . D.E. C . (M. Fishman) on 1 /7/93 . ' There shall be no disturbance to existing vegetation other than the existing lawn on which the additions are proposed to be located. If necessary the the applicants shall utilize staked hay bales during construction to reduce chances of runoff during periods of heavy rain. J.M.O. Consulting P.O. sox 447 104 Industrial Path LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL QUO.GV , NEW YORK 11959 (5.16),65.9-0607 DATE l G'✓ TAX MAP/ODD— Fax (516) 653-0603 ATTENTION TO { tl lur, \l� S ft()IMr���_ RE: YY-)ar`e-) `koaCL WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via APR It & o ems: I O Prints o Plans ❑ Forms ❑ S n®F So OLD ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION r THESE ARE TRANMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution �As requested ❑ Returned for corrections o Return corrected prints 13 For review and comment E3 ❑ Sign and return ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS . _T ,O®✓— f Drnn L COPY TO SIGNED: o5 / ... ........ .... . . .. Consultant _7M © GaMS�/f/"� Project .Name, iom�s W, /,3✓W� P [TOWN SCTA4 #1000",.40 _'s `93 / APR 1 5 1993 DatetSFlBilvRr The Southold Town Trustee office has determined that your application for ;a / *e'tlanermi is r^ ^� �-&1 incomp e please conshe following information in this regar or any required return submission: i o I f lee r1l 4 G;1770 -y_ /JJcM rI�G�IC� 7�4P- IDA " CJ 2. GRd.� tl-0 TU /.�e� '.il+e, (l��ir��f/'. /� .S'4ic/ dP l�✓.'r�. q r 77141 _ 17M 7�0 c /�W,4 i��i�iFi� o-�-, /�,�1�Ly �u�-� ��e�f��I-'d a., a�l D-h� ilk,f•�u ��Ye�l 44,46-pli-;,� T stee Representa�ivve CC: ✓Building Dept. `IZoninq Board of Appeals 4 Conservation Advisory Council This notice makes no claim with respect to other jurisdictions within or outside the Town of Southold with respect to permits, permission required. 4/92 TRUSTEES UFFO John M. Bredemeyer, III, President SUPERVISOR Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President SCOTT L.HARRIS ti Henry P. Smith o John B. Tuthill "' x Town Hall p ?r William G. Albertson 53095 Main Road y�o P.O. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD J-M.O. Consulting Glen Just P.O. Box 447 Quogue, NY 11959-0447 Re: Thomas W. ,Buckner SCTM #1000-10-5-2. 2 Dear Glen, The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during its regular meeting held on Thursday, April 29, 1993 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, J.M.O. Consulting on behalf of Thomas W. Buckner applied to the Southold, Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated April 16, 1993 and, WHEREAS said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and, _ WHEREAS, a publichearingwas held by the Town Trustees with respect to, said application on Thursday, April 29, 1993 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, :and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the jealth, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees approves the application of Thomas W. Buckner to construct 2 one-story additions and deck onto pre-existing siigle family dwelling and relocate existing septic tank. Located Private Road, Fishers Island. Permit will expire two years from the date it is signed. Fees must be ,paid, if a lcable and permit is �p P sued within six months of the date of this nbtiification. Two inspections are required and the Trustees are to `be notified upon completion of said project. Permit will be issued upona ent o P Ym f the following fees for work t b o be : done below M"''' can High Water g Mark: /1 Fees: $150.00 application fee. Very truly yours, ' � John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustee JMB:jd at { I o UTO a TRUSTEESPERMIT Y Issued T ► G . 9i,-D tlw der. A3 THIS NOTICE MUST BE DISPLAYER DURING_CONSTRUCTION TOWN TRUSTEES OFFICE.TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 TEL.: 765-1892 TRUSTEES %0F04e G SUPERVISOR John M. Bredemoer, III, President h� y� SCOTT L.HARRIS Albert I Krupski,Jr., Vice President o Henry P.Smith �? Town Hall John B. Tuthill • 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson 'j1Q1 �a�� P.O. Box 1179 Telephone (516)765-1892 Southold,New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD S.E,Q.R.A. NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT' APPLICATION NO. 1000-10-5-2.2 Chapt. 97 - wetlands NAME: Thomas W. Buckner Chapt. 37 - Coastal Erosion DATE; March 30 '1993 RESOLVED that pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Trustees, as. Lead- Agency for the action described below, has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on .the environment. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may alsa'' have an application pending for the same or similar project. A planting survey shall be submitted prior to final approval. TYPE OF ACTION: Unlisted CEA DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Applicant proposes to construct 2 one-family additions and deck onto pre-existing single family dwelling and relocate existing septic tank Located Private Road, Fishers Island. LOCATION:SCTM #1000-10-5-2.2 REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: 1. An onsite inspection has been conducted by the Board of Trustees. 2 . An environmental assessment, submitted by the applicant and reviewed and completed by the Board of Trustees, has indicated that no significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. cc: CAC TRUSTEESo��gtlFFU�,�CVG ` SUPERVISOR John M. Bredemeyer, III, President ti� y< SCOTT L.HARRIS Albert J. Krupsk, Jr., Vice President o Henry P Smith t+- Town Hall 53095 Main Road John B. Tuthill William G. Albertson y�01 ���� P.O. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Southold,New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST TO: Uh f1 lA17:�c� �� , Gc_ DATE: -I3 Enclosed is a permit_application and a completed part I of' the Environmental Assessment Form. Southold Town Trustees are interested in your ageny's comments in acting as SEQRA Lead Agency for: NAME:i�-.or,�t5 �cJC-14n2-� LOCATION vct yt_ V 1 �CSh�cS �5(G dtCl TAX MAP; /o-g-a.� _- PERMIT # DESCRPTN• PERMIT REQUIRED: (14 TOWN WETLAND ( ) OTHER SEQRA CLASSIFICATION: ) Type I ( ) Type II UNLISTED CEA Please contact John M. Bredemeyer, III, President, 0 days and be advised that the Southold Town Trustee assume lead agency. SENT TO: DOS ( ) DEC (� DOH ( ) PB ( ) ZBA ( ) BLD ( ) Please complete, detach and return this form to expedite processing. Involved Agency: Project Name: Location: SCTM: We at (Have/No) objection to Southold Town AGENCY Trustees assuming Lead Agency. Comments/Reasons: Signature of Authorized Representative APPEALS B OARD MEMBERS SCOTT L.HARRIS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Supervisor Serge Doyen,Jr. g :• Town Hall, 53095 Main Road James Dinizio,Jr °� P.O.Box 1179 Robert A.Villa ; Southold New York 11971 Richard CJ.Wilton Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone(516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS Telephone (516) 765-1800 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 23, 1993 Stephen L. Ham III,; Esq. Matthews & Ham 45HamptonRoad; Southampton, NY 11968 Re: Appl. No. 4152 - , Thomas Buckner 3 Site ID 1000-10-5-2.2 a - Lot,`##1 on the Map of Water Andrews 6-16-82 Dear Mr. Ham: This will confirm receipt of the above application based upon the February 5, 1993 Notice of Disapproval for proposed addition with insufficient setbacks from freshwater wetlands. _Inasmuch as the Notice of Disapproval has beencorrected by the � Building, Inspector to show that a sideyard setback determination ; will also need to be rendered, you have indicated that amendedM forms (including new neighbor notices and additional filing fee of $200..00) would be filed shortly. } g Also, as confirmed with you last week, the following should be filed not later than Monday, March 1, 1993 to complete the file foradvertisingand review purposes: a) proof of filing an application with the Southold Town rustees and copies of the Trustees ' preliminary-comments or Suggestions; b) proof of filing an application with the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation and copies of their preliminary comments or other update; c) construction diagram of the additions showing step areas, foundation, building overhangs, height variables, etc. ; d) photographs of the area between the freshwater wetlands and the existing dwelling, as well as photographs of all other structures or buildings {shedl within 75 feet of the freshwater wetlands; Consultant ® S✓1fi / Project Nerve -r4 oAg-s /V' 13, e, SCTM #1000- % --5 - -? Date The Southold Town Trustee office has determined that your application for a5 / rermi is - incomp e r�a please consider the following information tin ss regard—{—r or any required return submission: -� 41� �.�rs-aa �r✓rr. d3 ® 2- / f /N91LGlT/ruG «12uG?"/dar t /r/-Q :--Oh g; 4 /f t?A,7. it rrsf 12 ,err-�%�o-���-„�. s5r„r��ar�-c �, ��''�,�o .. �,,,( �a�m,��fo�, d�rz/e�- � .�vJ�,� �✓r�e�f T stee Represents CC: ABuilding Dept. `lZcning Board of Appeals Conservation Advisory Council This notice makes no claim with respect to other jurisdictions within or outside the Town of Southold with respect to permits, permission required. 4/92 k Southold Town Trustees Field Inspection Report Project Applicant/Number Site contains the following important natural features (Beach, Bluff, Duna, Secondary Dune, Escarpment, Kettle holes; Erratics or Significant Habitats, Rare, Threatened, Endangered or species of special concern: Extent proposed activities are at variance from established ' standards of Coastal Erosion Projection:; is supplemental engineering or advisory opinion indicated? Refer to CAC? Can impacts be moderated by simple _project phange. Sho d FEMA Rees. be checked Prior to Permittingo pli.cat, on complete, assement form provided/complete 4- e- _< Public services landward of Structure. Non-movable structures/additions prohibited. Permanent foundations not attached to movable structures No movable structure within 251 of landward limit of Bluff. No movable structure placed so excessive ground loading placed within 501 of point of inflection. Relocation agreement required/acceptable. Surface water not directed to/over bluff face. The Activity is: Reasonable and necessary, considering reasonable alternatives to the proposed activity and the extent to which the proposed activity requires a shoreline location. Not likely to cause a measurable increase in erosion at 4-- the proposed site and at other locations. Prevents or minimizes effects on natural protective features and their functions and protective values existing erosion protection structures and natural resources. REMARKS: �4 /uR"' ✓� �ti a^vyk Trustee signature Date inspected: Part 2—®PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEMAGNITt1DE - Responsibility of Lead Agency 1 2 3 l General Information (Read Carefully) Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON WATER • In completing the formthe reviewer should be guided by.the question. Have my responses and determinations been Moderate Large Mitigated By reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15,24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. -WNO DYES Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in Column 2 simply Examples that would apply to column 2 asks that it be looked at further: • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and protected stream. for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ F-1 Yes []No for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ El Yes []No • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and ,,. g Y p q Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No !i have been offered as guidance. The do not constitute an exhaustive list impacts thresholds to answer each question. � • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question: - • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? VNO ❑YES Instructions (Read carefully) Examples that would apply to column 2 a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be an impact.Y P u • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No II b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. j c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ El Yes []No impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2: If impact will occur but thres hold • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes []No is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A'No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This quality or quantity? ANO ❑YES must be explained in Part 3. Examples that would apply to column 2 fi • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ El Yes []No 1 2 3 • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No Small to Potential Can Impact Be have approval to serve proposed (project) action. Moderate Large Mitigated By IMPACT ON LANDImpact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 El 11 El Yes ❑No 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project gallons per minute pumping capacity. i )ONO ❑YES • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ Examples that would apply to column 2 supply system. 11 El Yes ❑No • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ El Yes []No foot of length), or where theg eneral slopes in the project area exceed 10%. Liquid effluentwl be conveyed off the site to facilities i es which presently Yes ❑No i do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than F-1 El El Yes ❑No e Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No 3 feet. day. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No a Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an El 11 ❑Yes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within El El ❑Yes ❑No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual 3 feet of existing ground surface. contrast to natural conditions. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will require the storage of,petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes EJ No than one phase or stage. products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ 11 Yes []No } • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No tons of natural material,(i.e.,rock or soil) per year. and/or sewer services. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No facilities. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ F-1 Yes 11 No 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)ZNO ❑YES_ 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or pat erns, or surface'' • Specific land forms ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No water runoff? XNO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • 6 Proposed Action_would change flood water flows. El El ❑Yes ❑No 7 \ ` / 25. Approvals Required: submittal 1 2 $ - Type Date Small to Potential Can Impact Be LreShW^r f e i1J�-4 LQAA' �S Moderate Large Mitigated By City, Town, Villa, e Bo,.rd TrittSlnaa:. *Yes ❑No Impact Impact Project Change City, Town, Village Planning Board Dyes LS�No --___—_-- — city, Town Loring Board $Xes ❑No • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. El El ❑Yes ❑No WL • e_• Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. El 11 ❑Yes ❑No City, County Health Department 0Yes M'Jo • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No Other Local Agencies Dyes •KNo • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No y Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes Colo State Agencies -Yes ❑No iqm, , 'C' IMPACT ON AIR Federal Agencies [-]Yes I54.plo 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ANO OYES C. Zoning and Planning Information / �f� w ✓s� Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given El El ❑Yes ❑No 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ❑Yes ❑No hour. If Yes, indicate decision required: • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit ❑subdivision ❑site plan refuse per hour. ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other — • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 2, What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? —_ heat sourceroducin more than 10 million BTU's per hour. tion will aglow an increase in the amount of land committed El El []Yes ❑No 3 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? • Proposed ac to industrial use. - - • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? development within existing industrial areas. 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Dyes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 7. What are the predominant land use(s)and zoning classifications within a '/a mile radius of proposed action? 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ',ZNO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/4 mile? ❑Yes ❑No • Reduction of one or more species listed on the .New York or Federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No _ 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? []Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other EJ El ❑Yes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, • Other impacts: El El ❑Yes ❑No fire protection)? ❑Yes ❑No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Dyes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes ❑No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or _ non-endangered species? ❑NO OYES a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ❑No Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No D. Informational Details migratory fish; shellfish or wildlife species. Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important avoid them. vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES E. Verification I certify that the information provi ed above is true to the best of my knowledge. 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? � _ [� _ Date -� VNO ❑YES Applicant/Sponsor a \ � Examples that would apply to column 2 Signature C Title eft ' �,�•�t�r1CU ��r`4��Z • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑- ❑ El Yes ❑No If the action is in t oastal Area, d ou ar a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) with this assessment. 5 8 f t 2. How much natural material„ rock, earth, etc.}will be removed from-,l site? _ j2r� tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? " Yes ❑No LJ N/A 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? Ar'�o, P.+acre ly ,i lowly- _ 4M—_y69 f P ar-eeis .a >. olV 1pe re i���e�C Moderate Large Mitigated By 1 b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes talo Impact Impact Project Change c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ANO (,•.( .ynsvl • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of E-10 El Yes []No4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? Lo3W acres. agricultural land. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ® The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No ❑Yes ffiNo of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more 6. If single phase project; Anticipated period of construction QL- months, (including demolition). than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. J • 7. If multi-phased: The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural El El El Yes ❑N 0 f� �� land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain tines, outlet ditches, a. Total number ofhases anticipated number. strip p p ( ) p cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g.9 . cause a farm b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition), field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. • Other impacts: ❑ EJ Yes ❑No d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ❑No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes RNO 9: Number of jobs generated: during construction (c7 after project is complete IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ANO DYES 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project . (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes id.No If yes, explain Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes SNo or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount man-made or natural b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged • Proposed land uses, or project componentsvisible to users of ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes �No Type i P enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. . . . 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes wo • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Explain screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Wes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes []No i ^, 16. Will the project generate solid waste? Dyes %No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑Yes 0N IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- c. If yes, give Name location historic or paleontological importance? '-ONO DYES d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes ❑No Examples that would apply to column 2 e. If Yes, explain • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No contiguous to any facility or site Fisted on the State or National Register 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑Yes Jo of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located withidthe El EJ ❑Yes []Noa. tf yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. project site. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? ; years: • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes wo- archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Dyes A O • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes e NO 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? (fifes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION If yes , indicate types) He_ _---Le � � �y2�61er�. 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or ., � future open spaces or recreational opportunities?22. If water supply.is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute: Examples that would apply to column 2 )RN0 DYES 23 Total anticipated water usage per day AJ( gallons/dayC?_'�"5% • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No 24, Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Dyes ®NO • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No If Yes, explain • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 4 9 ; 1 2 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: *10% 1 no\ % ❑10-15% IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be Ell 5% or greater % 14, Will there be an effect to existing transportation stems? Moderate Large Mitigated By 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the'National NO DYES Impact Impact Project Change Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes 'moo Examples that would apply to column 2 7. is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes +VNo ° Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 8, What is the depth of the water table?(-� (V (in feet) ® Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No g, Is site located over a primary; principal, or sole source aquifer? %Xes []No ® Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? 54es ❑No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? IMPACT ON ENERGY ❑Yes �lo According to , 15. Well proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or , Identify each species energy supply? RNO DYES 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Examples that would apply to column 2 ® Proposed.Action will cause greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑Yes )60 Describe any form of energy in the municipality. © Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy - ❑ . ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space orrecreation area? transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family ❑Yes �4No If yes, explain residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. 14 Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ® Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No ❑Yes ❑No (-JI n VY r;) vV _ pp 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: cA- �r�� t i rStxv� Ot���,c Vc�S Y�let ? 1711 l� NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary hf /la 16. Will there be objectionable odors; noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? X10 ❑YES 16. Lakes, ponds, Claud areas avh�i� or Contiguous}o project area: t Examples that would apply to column 2 a. Name s1 xQ( c9 L` b. Size (In acres) N l o Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Wes ❑No facility. a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ❑Yes []No 1�111q a Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? []Yes EJ No Nlrii —. 4 Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Section 303 and 304? []Yes 5440 ` o Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ El Yes []No noise screen. � 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 El Dyes ❑No of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? 5 lYes ❑No a Other impacts: El 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes 9No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17, Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? B. Project Description! NO []YES 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) Examples that would apply to column 2 A ® Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 1��� acres. substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation,etc.)in the event of b. Project acreage to be developed: C?�Off' I acres initially; 0s (DPV acres ultimately. accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped1•= `J3 acres. discharge or emission. q d. Length of project, in miles: _N L-A-(If appropriate) o Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any El El ❑Yes ❑N° e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed %; form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing proposed (-Y- infectious, etc.) g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? ® Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No _ gas or other flammable liquids. h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ El ❑Yes ❑NO within 2;000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous Initially r9n� ?71 waste. Ultimately m Other impacts: El El ❑Yes ❑No i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure _tea height; 7—width; ra0-:7 j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is. ft. 10 3 ( � PART 1—PROJEC`f INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can impact Be NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD g g p p Y g Moderate Large Mitigated By on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through'E. Answers to these questions will be considered 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existin community? Impact Impact Project Change as part of the application.for approval and may be subject to further verification and Public review. Provide any additional O []YES information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. Examples that would apply to column 2 It is expected that completion of the full;EAF will be dependent,on information currently available and will not involve • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No l NAME OF ACTION h will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ El Yes ONO LOCATION OF ACTION(include Street Address, Muniolpalityand County)' - ry • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. El El ❑Yes ❑No iJA fot� l-ih2C5 � (tv t • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No NAME OF APPLICANT/SIPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE or areas of historic Importance to the community. C' rhoeY,aS \rJ r S l (05 3_0(00:;1 ADDRESS — • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No U� (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) CITYIPO- STATE ZIP CODE • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes END �t a 119yci— f • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ []Yes END NAME OF ER(If different) i � C BUSINESS TELEPHONE • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO € _ ' rho S W C Leer b(,9v3, 4/3 6/- 6C)E 3 — €kkI ADDRESS _ I 14. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE potential adverse environmental impacts? 19NO DYES DESORIPTION OF ACTION tt t If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 k I' Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable e k X Site Description Pert 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Physical setting of. overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas, Responsibility of. Lead Agency Y1. Present land use: Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial �ResidenGal (suburban) ,ural (non-farm) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be 2. Total acreage of project area: acres. mitigated. Instructions APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres 1 . Briefly describe the impact. Forested �r tL(y acres �. ��7 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) t� acres acres ? Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24; 25 of ECL) Ri,C2T)64 acres acres y 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. Water Surface Area _ acres acres To answer the question of importance, consider: ��� • The probability of the impact occurring Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) �SfRV ��C f� �. � �. acres acres s • The duration of the impact Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces r0s0�Cro acres � .OaL/ acres • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value Other (Indicate type) n.44CN acres 0L_('0 acres • Whether the impact can or will be controlled eao�c�'n. S'C., 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? y S-e • The regional consequence of the impact a. Soil drainage: %Yell drained l 00 % of site []Moderately well drained % of si e • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals ❑Poorly drained % of site • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS (Continue on attachments) Land Classification System? N acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on�pro� j�eect site? ❑Yes '�lo a. What is depth to bedrock? �p00 (in feet) �r �I 2 11 —J 14-16-2 (2147)--7c 617.21 SEQR3 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting - the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination n> process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. t Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basicproject data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions' Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of.the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions VV 161111__16h Name of Action Name of Lead AgencyPrint or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature esponsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) .Date 1 F.v %w,x r e_.. . .�r r.. c r�.''-k�M"E yr' ry „ ..z L, .fpP 4,':�` �.-.yea s..< 41'�l• -` -Zp. >-a.' � �� - '"'n f �- +X +x , �.,.. •a W .. .:;. ...:.. . :.5, .»"r es"e d -,n, .. •. ..E.&.:�-fx.f' ...., >.» h 'S"v^iF "mak':R!'�„i, f $ ;.r Y A.T .rn:;C .._s..._ i....?x4+."'Y-x Ss , ,. � i., _. .; «.:,s.. �- . ..�. ..... t�_ ,y,,� _%..,�:,,t%^.ry n ;-h•�.'.v, .a.n .._"�'"`g .•--rx =�. `5 _. ,:.fi? N &i .._. of :a -.,-t ..exr-�*`�` +...,, r :.. fir, _ t SER a -._ WICOPESSETI.� I' I S H D R _ S I S L A ,_ N D . N D East Pt. �9 7 fl 7atd NORTH DUMPLING WINTHROP (LIGHTHOUSE) 011 \s I tJm/td, °t �¢ne 5 u FINE IS. d H 5 Pon Q .3 4 /14 W E Brooks Pt. EAST HARBOR o + ° 0 SOUT}t (�J {q� FLAT HAMMOCK ❑. ° C, EI 90 Ft o ' DUMPLING(/ t1 _ -. . ' _ o ° ungrpt. 77 515 _ 9 VV` _ Clay Pt. a ❑_.. _�/°L�' - ❑ o O ❑ r l •.v.- -.-:_ AC3 2 16 0 ° A ! q WRECK I. CHOCOMOUNT ° I[0 ❑ o �_ b.Beach :- t gi 140 Ft+ a ° ° FISHERSISLAND Hill North _ °. �°v¢EI.70 Ft - v __ °. . ° Barte •COUNTRY CLUB - I fieId Cone° QOOCO CO, r O Treaxure ° �an ° Perch Pond v. °fara°'Fer I Pand� FCA T o Q N D o Beach (PLAINS ° C F 00 Hawks Nest ° p I _ Bartom`p Point Pond h Q v ° 00a .('VEST OR tp0.t�µ0. Ixland Pond each ❑°° FISHERS O ° O NlldBeach �p•�7 ° ISLAND e m S7 StOng 0 `VLAY914B¢OB YACHT di' IV O r, o ✓ I O �at �3 Beach \ c o e CLU¢ p. Bpi:�. Yard o \ M1 o Yond O _ HARHABOR o OO vo O°� pp 00 tl FL, Ft. O �eaer 0 0 o n0tt M1 poi coUe PI7S0 p o S SCALE or macs Providence r►9 7 �'GOILIIIAILIBc [t¢ to is zo zs MASS. GLARD ouo 0000000 a ❑ 86.5 3 b _._..,�....,\ : Hartford i n 00011. ' "Et .z o CONNECTICUT � RHODE 0 THAYIkE U. S.N. ISLAND FISHERS ISLAND Sotvth Beach i% (�_ �'(.. o Norwich n �2 �i a ❑ L7 �) j, SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. U ELIZABETH � NeW dBO . / AIRPORT Wilderness Pt. 42" kAott o c'/'� London b °"Herr LEGEND SaI hroot:o All-weather roads Watch Hill FISHERS 1, Race PL - / VIP Dirt roads eland SOn n P Lam 10 ch 71 n�, n{19LocR i, (� SCALE Greenport Lam L _ YARDS e t � AFIOINER -6 -Soo- .raoo - :. _ Sout oY LONG ISLAND oun .. o ATLANTtC OCEAN _. 'AC, N.Y. - I _ x - _ w 1 t I 1 A Q�' I SITE M \\\• , r ;n y \\ ••✓1 •' � 2 �' MMI ' :� M• \\\ \I • �V\'-' r 'A•'4 1� 8 � \ O" O; 0 4 •y P� LOC,, A7I0N MAF 'W ST6°31 3, aoo 2ao a aoD AI SD qA 2 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET s 4- 4- IL - �Fp ti y WLF 5 AL p WLF 4 LIMIT OF COASTAL EROSION / 6 HAZARD AREA PER COASTAL \.li WLF 3 EROSION HAZARD AREA MAP SW -,__` 46-F1. OF 49 REFERENCE MAP: !, III tip30 PLAN OF PROPERTY TO BE CONVEYED BY SUZANNA' \m `'�yso 30,E VON DER 5GHULENBER6 TO THOMAS H. BUGKNER ��// wLF z / —� I F15HERS ISLAND, NEW YORK, SCALE: I" = 40'pHAND- 'SD uMlrs of TIDAL wsnamos� 1 LER, PALMER t KING, NORWICH, CONN., JULY 19, 1991. ' 90. FLAGGED DY i MO CONSULTINE / I 'UST 1/7/93Ilk 24' 546°0. /�/ 201' OAK MOAPL� :NOTES '1 / I LIMIT OF FRESH WA TE ' 0'• "�11 I WETLANDS FLAGGED BY P _ WLF I '/ / \ M. FISHMAN N. SO EG. I COORDINATE DISTANCES ARE MEASURED FROM \ 1/7/93 I U.S. COAST AND 6EODETIG SURVEY TRIANGULATION 206°3' / \ DEC 9 STATION "NIN". 6/ / ' \� 1 DEG6 2. BASE FOR LEVEL5, N.6.V.D. 1929. \0 !p .,,;, .1' :a��,i„�„ 3. LOT IS PORTION OF FORMER BLOCK 39 LOT'S. DE $�e..I,::L ,A"1• ',v: C �O 6 a 6c'I' OIL FILL PP \ IRON 9 c '�” O SHED SII In, 1 III,rF PIPE n� ''Il�ili i ylli :F�IITI'�it nl5'il li.� IRON PIPE PROPOSED S\NG N� so PROPOSED D6C 1 IIII ,i,�11, 1l�il,ll�ly I,,IIIII,'Ili 24°OAK 6X\°' NPT\� I I°�''. IIII I S�I' IIi1 'i STORY >' I I I' I:' p. 61'6 il' til IIII 1,! IIII ,II _N_165 33 '"ns p DDITION FFE5.0 i I' I� 1 II ',I 11l,t ,ill ,4i: �D I W304533 Gl 6cK \ I SII i l l „l E 1, l l (nO O PR POSE Y O 2 AD ITN SEP •\ \ Ill I' IIII I' 1 ,1 l,l y, lil l'. V PROPOSED A RELOCATED PROPOSED EA\Cn\ SEPTIC TANK 6 \ DECK �lo!y,liil ji R 725.—n' L 163 75' 12°-55'55' A 39:: " GRAVEL DRIVE DELI DRYWELL6 3660si 4,, LIS 0 1993 D 93 je„f \ Q � 7°/ OF SOUTHOLD h(u TO OOP PREPARED ORAS 00 N 05_'2053 IRON PIPE 2 R 725A� E 51pdEOFNEfV1pTP� THOMAS A. BUCKNER GJ"pOH li, i � : 30 30 15 0 BENCHMARK ELEVATION 1258 CI,'�i,-S_a1L� GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET PORTION BLOCK 311 LOT 41 TOP OF IRON PIPE FISHERS ISLAND, NEW YORK �Fu tis 7;I' 7 '� , AEf .IIIAti�'� ' f ' REVISIONS CFANDI-ER, PALMER 6, KING Ar DATE DESCRIPTION Aichitwb. Engln•en and San yon �� 110 ROAOVAY I Wa, 0 0aa•a lK1-Ml-X#] Flat W�K-Jb1 DATE1 JANUARY 13, 1993 '1 SCALES 1” = 30' ! SHEET 1 OF