The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBRIM, JOHN TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Alberi J. KmpskL Jr., Vice President Henry P, Smith John B. Tathitl %~rlllimm 6. Albegson l'elephone (516) 765-t892 Fax (516) 7654823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SO[mi'HOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTT L HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road RO. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 June 19, 1992 Glenn Just P.O. Box 447 Quog~le, ~ 11959 Re: John Brim SCI~ !000-4-~-3 Dear Mr. Just: The following action was taken by the Board of Trustees at their reopl!ar meeting of May 28, 1992: RESOLVED-,~tt~t the Southold To~n Board of Trustees grant a waiver to iocatedaecessory tennis court with steps~ retaining wa!l, removal of existing garage as per revised maps dated April 7~ 1992. ~' 'Ifyou have any questions please give us a call, r~truiy yours, John ~. Brede~meyer~ III President~ Board of Trustees JBIB/jmt ~ - c. Bldg. Dept. ZBA TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, IL!, President Henry P. Smith, Vice President Alberl J. Krapsld, John L. Bednoski, Jr. John B. Tu~2~ill Telephone (5165'765-1892 Fax (516) 765-i823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Sou~olc~ New York 11971 March 31, 1992 J,M.O. Consulting P.O. Box 447 Quogue~ New York 11959 RE: Brim, Fishers Island SCT~! ~1000-4-3-3 Dear Mro Just: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Board of Trustees on Thursday, February 27~ 1992: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Trustees grants a waiver to construct a tennis court, regrade (no fill to be trucked in) and install dry wells as per plan dated January 31, 1992 SUBJECT to inspection° Please note that representatives of the Trustees inspected the above referenced property on March 18th and find plans in accordance with waiver approval~ A refund check in the amount of $115.00 is enclosed, as a full application was not need. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly ~6ursr John M. Bredemeyer~ IIi President, Board of Trustees JS~: jmt cc: ZBA FISHERS ISLAND CONSERVANCY, INC. BOX 553 FISHERS ISLAND. ~ YORK 06390 June 11, 1992 TOWN OF Mr. George Hammarth NY State DEC - Regulatory Affairs SUNY, Buildng 40 Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 Re: Permit Application No. 1-4738-00501-00002 Dear Mr. Hammarth: Z write this letter on behalf of the Executive Committee of the Fishers Island Conservancy regarding the permit application of Mr. John Brim(who recently purchased the former Whitney estate on Fishers Island) to build a tennis court on his newly acquired prem- ises. We have nothing Whatsoever against the building of tennis courts, but in this particular case we have some serious environ- mental grounds for concern. For the last 6 years, the Fishers Island Conservancy has with considerable success tried to persuade Island property owners to maintain at least a 75' to 100' distance between newly conceived structures and the borders of any fresh water wetland. Not only do these quoted distances conform to Southold Town and NY State DEC regulations, but they make sense from an environmental point of view, particularly on Fishers Island, where the entire Island has been classifed by Suffolk County as a "Critical EnviroD_mental Area". You can imagine our concern, then, when we heard that Mr. Brim's proposed tennis!court will lie within 30 feet of a DEC- marked wetland on one side. Our prime concern here is of course environmental, and were we to have knowledge of the plans for such a project so close to a wetland without uttering an expression of our deepest concern, we would be going against everything we have striven for, over the better part of a decade. Again - we have no objections whatsoever to Mr. Brim's building a tennis cour~ on his newly acquired property. We would urge him, however, since his property is well over 3 acres in size, to try to buitd his tennis court on an area not so Close to the wetlands, where such environmental hazards asclear-cutting, earth- moving and grading, newilandscaping, etc. make the nearness of his project to the wetland doubly unsound environmentally. Un~il these environmentally-based conditions are corrected, then, this Conservancy cannot favor the granting of a DEC permit to Mr. Brim's tennis court project. When construction is planned this close to a wetland, yet where ample space appears to be available elsewhere on ~e Same property, then surely some other site not sO envir0nm~nt~l~Y sens~tiveShould be bothchOsen and acted UPon. Sincerely, Thatcher, Ji~. Pres ident Fishers Island Conservancy, Inc. cc: Southold Board of Trustees - 2 - APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Telephone (516} 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Jur~e 10 · SCOTF L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-i800 Stephen L. Ham, Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton, NY III, Esq. 11968 Re: Appl. No. 4111 - John and Elena Brim (Amended Variance) Dear Mr. Ham: Please find attached a copy of the Board's findings and determination rendered at our June 4, 1992 Special Meeting concerning the above application requesting an amendment to the board's resolution adopted under Appl. No. 4097. Please be sure to return to the Building Inspector and any other agencies which may have jurisdiction on this project as amended. Copies of this determination have been forwarded to the Building Department and the Town Trustees for their update and permanent records, as well as to the Suffolk County Department of Planning pursuant to the Administrative Code of Suffolk County (which governs projects within 500 feet of the sounds, creeks, estuaries, county lands, etc.). Very truly yours, Linda Kowalski Enclosures Copies of Decision to: Southold Town Building Department Suffolk County Department of Planning Southotd Town Trustees APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Ir. James Di~zio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS SCO'I/I'L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765~ Telephone (516~ ~;6521800 Appl. No. 4111: Matter of JOHN G. AND MARIE ELENA BRIM. Amended variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-33 for permission to locate accessory tennis court with steps and retaining wall in the side yard and partly in the front yard, and having an insufficient.setback from the front property line and the freshwater wetlands, (which will include the removal of an existing garage presently in the side yard)- Location of Property: Northerly side of Private Road off East End Avenue, Fishers Island, Town of Southold; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-4-3-3; also referred to as FIDCO Block 18, Lots lA and lB as combined, having a total land area of 3.56+- acres in this R-120 Zone District. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on June 4, 1992, and all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded;i and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and 1W~EREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar With the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION: The premises in question is located in the R-120 Zone District at the East End of Fishers Island, fronting along the north side of Private Road and frontage- along Fishers Island Sound, and identified on the Suffolk County Tax Map as District 1000, Section 4, Block 3, Lot 3. 2. SITE DESCRIPTION: The subject premises is improved with a 4700+- sq. ft. dwelling, accessory swimming pool, extensive garden and driveway areas, and accessory garage structures, all as shown on the site plan map prepared by Richard H. Strouse, L.E. for Chandler, Palmer & King, L.S. on Page 2 - Appl. No. 4111 Decision Rendered June 4, 1992 Matter of JOHN AND ELENA BRIM January 31, 1992. The subject premises consists of a total lot area of 3.56+- acres (combined as one lot: FIDCO n~mbers lA and lB). The contours of the property vary significantly as depicted on the site plan may revised February 21, 1992 (also prepared by Chandler, Palmer & King, L.S.). 3. AMENDMENT REQUESTED: This application is requesting an- amended location for a proposed tennis court {which was originally submitted for a 60' by 120' tennis court with a minimum distance: (a) from the easterly side lot line at 15 feet, (b) from the southerly front property line at not less than six (6') feet, and (c) from the wetlands as flagged by the D.E.C. at 43 (or 44') feet}. The location as amended is shown on the "May 12, 1992 Layout Plan" prepared by Chandler, Palmer & King with the following proposed setbacks: (a) from the most northeasterly setback to the property line at 10.2 feet and 11+- ft. to the arc along the easterly side property line; (b) the setback from the southerly front property line will not be changed -- being not less than six (6') feet; the feet. (c) the setback from the southeasterly most corner of tennis court enclosure scales out to be at not less than 20 court grade. 4. HEIGHT: No change is proposed for fence height of ten (10') feet from tennis the tennis court base at 5. BASIS OF REQUEST: The testimony received under the previous application appears emphasized the need for preserving two large cherry trees at the expense of extensive regrading and excavating that would have been necessary to locate the court in that particular location. The newly proposed location would require a substantial reduction in the amount of land excavation (now at 140 yards). {See testimony to support the amended application from Oliver Cope (Architect)}. 6. In checking with the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation, it was confirmed that a plan to reduce the amount of- land excavation is encouraged eventhough the setback to the wetlands for a surface tennis court is closer. (More disturbance would be created to the land areas by excavation than by a surface tennis court at grade with fencing.) 7. In considering this appeal, it has been found that: Page 3 ~ppl. No. 411~-~ ...... · Decision Rendered June 4, 1992 Matter of JOHN AND EL~.~.A to the circumstances; the relief is the minimal necessary underlthe (c) the relief as granted will not alter the · areas~surrounding ?the future due to~the~land wetland area~ (~d) the relief re~ested will not, in turn, be adverse to the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience, or order of the or+be adve since is~more ~han ~eet distant; (e) the relief requested does not involve an increase of dwelling unit density and therefore will not cause an effect on available governmental facilities; (f) the property is unique in that there is limited "rear" yard area as defined in our zoning code due to the characterof this waterfront community and the layout of the land and principal building; (g) before any activities are commenced, all other agency approvals muse be issued in writing and made a part of the town permit records including an amended application to the Town Trustees and the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation, with which reviews are being or have been finalized; (h)the project will comply with the front yard limitation in the previous determination (under Appl. No. 4097 rendered May 7, 1992) and is to be at least 100 feet from the top ~.of the sound bluff as required by Section 100-239.4 of the Zoning Code. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Doyen, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT permission in the Matter of the Application of JOH/~ G. AND MARIA ELENA A. BRIM to locate a 60 ft. by 120 ft. tennis court with 10 ft. high fence around its perimeter as shown on the layout plan as amended May 12, 1992, prepared by Chandler, Palmer & King, L.S. and SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Page 4 - Appl. No. 4111 Decision Rendered June 4, 1992 Matter of JOHN AND ELENA BRIM 2. That screening to the edge of the easterly driveway area be planted and maintained along the easterly section of the proposed tennis court fence for a minimum height of six feet. Such screening shall be ivy or similar vines, or evergreens 6 to 8 ft. apart. (Alternative screening may be substituted by the ZBA Chairman, when requested in writing). 3. That screening along the southerly yard area (front yard and southeasterly corner) adjacent to the tennis court be planted and maintained for a minimum height of five to six feet. Such screening shall be staggered evergreens (or similar plantings as may be approved by the ZBA Chairman, when requested in writing). 4. That the setbacks from the easterly property line shall not be less than 10.2 feet (as shown on the initial site plan) and not less than 29 feet to the nearest wetland edge {flagged by the DEC}. Vote oi the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Grigonis, Dinizio, and Villa. This resolution was duly adopted. lk GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Telephone 516] 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF $OUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Superwsor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Soutbold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 ~ay iz,' 1992 Stephen L. Ham iii, Esq. Matthews & Ham 45 Hampton Road Southampton, NY 11968 Re: Appl. No. 4097 - John G. and Maria Elena A. Brim Dear Mr. Ham: Please find attached a copy of the Board's findings and determination rendered at our meeting of Thursday, April 2, 1992 approving the first, initial plan prepared by Chander, Palmer & King revised February 21, 1992 concerning the above application. Please be sure to return to the Town Building Department and any and all other agencies which may have jurisdiction before commencing building activities. Copies of this determination have also been furnished this date to the Building Department and the Town Trustees for their update and permanent recordkeeping. Very truly yours, Linda Kowalski Enclosure Copies of Decision to: Southold Town Building De/partment Southold Town Trustees1,/ Suffolk County Deparument of Planning APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis. Jr. Serge Doyen. Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Telephone (5161 765-t809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS ,O SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 Appl. NO. 4097: Matter of JOHN G. AND MARIE ELENA BRIM. Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-33 for permission to locate accessory tennis cour~ with steps and retaining wall !n the side yard a~d partly in the front yard, and having an insufficient setback from the front proper~y line and the freshwater wetlands, (which will include the removal of an existing garage presently in the side yard). Location of Property: Northerly side of Private Road off East End Avenue, Fishers Island, Town of Southotd; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-4-3-3; also referred to as FIDCO Block 18, Lots lA and lB as combined, having a total land area of 3.56+- acres in this R-120 Zone District. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on April all those who desired to be heard were heard and recorded; and 2, 1992, and their testimony WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the followlng findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is located in the R-120 Zone District a2 the East End of Fishers 'Island, fronting along the north side of Private Road and frontage along Fishers Island Sound. 2. The subject premises is mmproved with a 4700+- sq. ft. dwelling, accessory swimming pool, extensive garden and driveway areas, and accessory garage structures, all as shown on the site plan map prepared by Richard H. Strouse, L.E. for Chandler, Palmer & King, L.S. on January 31, 1992. The subject premises- consists of a tonal lot area of 3.56+- acres (combined FIDCO lot numbers lA and lB). P~ge 2 - Appl. No. 40~7 Decision Rendered May 7, 1992 Matter of JOH~N AND ELENA BRiM 3. Submitted initially with the application for consideration is the proposed location of a 60' by 120' tennis court with a minimum distance: (a) from the easterly side lot line at 15 feet, (b) from the southerly front property line at not less than six (6') feet, and (c) from the wetlands as flagged by the D.E.C. at 43 (or 44') feet. The tennis court fence is proposed at a height of ten feet from tennis court base at grade. 4. Subsequently, at the public hearing, the attorney for the applicant submitted an amended map (dated April 7, 1992) for consideration as the preferred atternative),re-positioning the tennis court closer to the east, with a minimum setback at the northeast corner of the tennis court at 2-1/2 feet instead of 15 feet (and at 20 feet instead of 35+- feet at the southeasterly corner of the tennis court). {See additional documentation submitted to support the ~nended application, including the affidavit of Oliver Cope (Architect) concerning existing 24~ cherry trees and oak trees at the location of the proposed tennis court and ground elevations of the site.} 5. it is the position of this Board that the second alternative to position to tennis court at 2-1/2 feet from the property line at its closest point (at the northeast corner of the tennis courT) and 22 feet from the nearest wetlands as flagged by the D.E.C. is substantial in relation to the requirements and is not the minim~ necessary to afford relief under the circumstances. 6. Accordingly, it is the position of the Board that the initial site plan map revised February 21, 1992 positioning the tennis court at a distance 15 feet from the easterly property line and at 43 (44') from the nearest wetlands as flagged by the D.E.C. is not unreasonable in that: (a) the circumstances are uniquely related to the land and are not personal in nature to the landowner; (b) the relief is the minimal necessary under the circumstances; (c.) the relief as granted will not alter the essential character o~ the neighborhood since it is not uncommon to locate accessory uses of this nature in areas other than the waterfront yard areas (which under our current zoning ordinance is defined as the rear yard area}; (d) the relief requested will not, in turn, be adverse to the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience, or Page 3 - Appl. No. 4097 Decision Rendered May 7, 1992 Matter of JOHN AND ELENA BRIM order of the town, or Db adverse to neighboring properties since the nearest neighborinq residence is more than 500 feet distant; (e) the relief requested does not involve an increase of dwelling unit density and therefore will not cause an effect on available governmental facilities; (f) the property is unique in that there is limited "rear" yard area as defined in our zoning code due ~o the character of this waterfront co~unity and the layout of the land and principal building. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Doyen, seconded by Mr. Dinizio, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT permission in the Matter of the Application of JOHN~nd ~3LqiA?~,~-NAA. BRIM to locate a 60 ft. by 120 ft. tennis court with 10 ft. high fence around its perimeter as shown on the site plan amended February 21, 1992 prepared by Chandler, Palmer & King, L.S. and SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: t. That there be no lighting which would be adverse to neighboring properties or traffic; 2. That screening ~o the edge of the easterly driveway area be planted and maintained along the easterly section o~ the proposed tennis court fence for a minimum height of six feet. Such screening shall be mvy or similar vines, or evergreens 6 to 8 ft. apart. (Alternative screening may be substituted by the ZBA Chairman, when requested in writing). 3. That the setbacks from the easterly property line shall not be less than 15 feet (as shown on the initial site plan) and not less than 40 to 43 feet to the nearest wetland edge {which is shown to be flagged by the DEC}. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Dinizio, and Villa. (Member Grigonis was absent.) This resolution was duly adopted. lk GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, ~. CHAIRMAN / / ~0 MAiN gOAD_ (FAST END) j.m.o, consulting p.o. box 447 quogue, n.y. 11959 (516) 653-0607 SO UTH_Oj ~ Board o'f To~',~n Trustees To~n Of Sc~uthold 'To~,,~n ~iall. 5Z-'.095 Ma3. n Road P,O. Box ~].79 Southoid, N.Y. i±97i S.C.T=M. ~o.£ ........ 4 -,. ±992 ~c,oj.]y enclosed)= our or:Lo inai ~ubmission for 'th~~,~=~.r~.-~u,,.~ ...... ~'-~n o9 a ~"~,.,.~ ~ than '~he area.~-'f freshwater ,.~'-'~'~".~,~"~,~= a~]d 'cncg'' 'fmw ~x:fsting garaga~, l't ~as not orig.ina!!y apoarent that ~fihe cherry tre~s "- J.M.O. Consulting P.O. Box 447 104 Industrial Path QUOGUE, NEW YORK 11959 (516) 653-0607 Fax (516) 653-0603 ARESENDIN6YO~ B Attached ~ ~nder ~epmate oo~e~via LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL [] Prints rq Plans E3 Forms [] [] Copy of letter D Change order [] COPIES DATE NO. DESCEIPTIO~ THESE ARE TRANMITTED as checked below: [] For approval [] [] For your use [] o As requested o [] For review and comment [3 o Sign and return [3 Approved as subm~ted Approved as noted Returned for corrections [] Resubmit Submil Return PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US __copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints COPY TO SIGNED: TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III. President Henry P. Smith. Vice President Albert J, Krupski. Jr. lohn L. Bednoski. Jr. John B, Tuthill Telephone (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TOWN OF SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P,O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 516) 765-1800 APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE TOWN SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK, FORT HE ISSUANCE OF ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE COASTAL AND INTERIOR WETLANDS, FLOOD PLAINS AND DRAINAGE AREAS OF SOUTHOLD TOWN, AND THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 32 OF THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. APPLICATION NO. APPLICANT'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: LOCATION OF PROPER~ FOR REQUESTED PE~IT: I LENGi~ l~SLO~ WIDTH: ~0~ .... ~pp. Page 2~ YDS. TO BE EXCAVATED: ~ YDS. TO BE FILLED: MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED: WIDTH OF CANAL, CREEK OR BAY FRONTING PROPERTY: DEPTH AT LOW TIDE: k~ I.~ AVER. RISE IN TIDE: DISTANCE TO NEAREST CHANNEL: DISTANCE PROJECT EXTENDS BEYOND SIMILAR PROJECTS IN AREA: AREA ZONINg: ~--%~ IS PROJECT FO~ PRIVATE OR BUS. USE: DESCRIBE KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON PREMISES: ~O~k~ HAS ANY PRIOR LICENSE OR PERMIT BEEN ISSUED TO ERECT STRUCTURES, DREDGE, OR DEPOSIT FILL ON SAID PREMISES: HAS ANY LICENSE OR PERMIT EVER BEEN REVOKED OR SUSPENDED BY A GOVERNMENTAL DESCRIBE PROPOSED CONDITION OF PROPER~ AFTER WORK IS COMPLETED. INCLUDE SURVEY OF PROPER~ SITE IF NECESS~Y: ~ ~P./~ ADDITIONAL ~E THERE ~ COVEN~TS OR ~STRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED WHICH WOULD PROHIBIT THIS PROJECT: ~ ~ITTEN CONSENT OF O~ER IF NOT THE S~E AS APPLIC~T: New York State Department of Environmental ConServation Region I Headquarters SUNY, Building 40, Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 (516) 751-1596 To: Date: Thomas C. Jorling Commissioner RE: FRESHWATER WETLAND BOUNDARY CONFIRMATION TAX r~P ~ /~0~ - ~ ~ ~ In response to your request, a field inspection was ~ade of the above referenced property. The freshwater wetland boundary, as flagged by your f~rm, has been confirmed for the purposes of this application. The'Freshwater Wetlands Act, Article 24 of the ~nvironmental Conservation Law, regulates most develooment activities within 100 feet of this boundary. Should you apply for a 3ermit, your site plan must deoict the flagged wetland boundary as located by a licensed surveyor. I strongly recommend that you promptly hire a surveyor to plot these flags. The boundary should be noted on the survey or site plan as follows: FRESHWATER WETLAND BOUNDARY AS FLAGGED BY (YOUR ~AM[) AND APPROVED FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS APPLICATION BY N.Y.S.D.EoC. ON I / If you have any questions, please contact the Bureau of Environmental Protection at (516) 751-1596. Si/~t~e]c~]ly, ,~ / /~ /' _,? Steven Jay Sa~d R6gional Ma~g~ 3ureau of En~ronmental Protection SJS:ki CC: L~COMLOG M PAPLOG ~_NAP ~CARD FILE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) STATE OF NEW YORK ) BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND SAYS THAT HE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS, AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THATWORKWILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FRO~ ANYAND ALL DAMAGES ANDCLAIMS ARISING uNDER OR BY ViRTuE OF SAID PERMIT, IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBy AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT 0R!RE~RE~NTATIVE, TO ENTER'ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INsPEcT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS A~PLICATION. Signa~%f A~t ~3 SWOPd~TO BEFORE ME THIS ~-- DAY OF N%TARY PUBLIC EXAMINED BY APPROVED DISAPPROVED CONDITIONS (If any) SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN COMPUTATION OF FEES Approved 2/27/85 '~ onsul ing J.m.o. c t p.o. box 447 quogue, n.y. 11959 (51&) 653-0607 TO whom it may concern: Please be advised that I have authorized Glenn E. Just, President of J.M.O. Consulting to act as the agent on my behalf to apply for and to secure the necessary permits through your agency. Dated: ~14~16-2 (2/87i-- 7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full lEAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an order[v manner, whether a project or action ma~ be s~gnificant. The ouestion of whether an action mav be significant is not always easy to answer. FreQuent- ly, there are a~ 3ects of a prolect that are subiective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance ma~, have little or 9o formal knowledge of the enwronment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the q ~estion of significance The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full £AF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given prolect and its site. By identifying basic project data it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action, t provides guidance as to whether an ~mpact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actuallv important, DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE~Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part I [] Part 2 [:]Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each imoact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: El~ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s] and. therefore, ~s one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration wilt I~ I~,e~red. [] B, Although the proiect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result ih one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration ~s only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Resoonsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency 'Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the act)oD proposed may have a significant effect on the environment Please complete the entire form. Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Existing single family dwellin~ LOCATION OF ACTION {Include Street Address, Municipality and County) Private road, Fishers Island, Suffolk NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSO~ Glenn E. Just/J.M.O. Consulting ADDRESS P.O. Box 447 CITY/PO . . Quogue NAME OF OWNER (If different) John G. Brim ADD~ East End Avenue ISUSINESS TELEPHONE t 516 653~0607 STATE I ZIP CODE NY I 11959-04t7 SUSINESS TELEPHONE 21~ 988-4914 I STATE I ZIP CODE CITY/~ lq. ]fork NY 10028 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION It PLEASE SEE ATTACttED~t Plea~se Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A, if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. ~Residential (suburban) ~Commercial E]Other 1. Present land use: E]Orban ~lndustrial ~Forest [qAgriculture 2 Total acreage of project area: ~ ~.~ ~ acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) J ~ acres ~ ~--~--~'~ acres Fores. ted ~ acres ~ acres Agricultural (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) C'~ I~T~ acres (~ C)?:) acres Wetland Fre[f..~w..~t__e? or tidal as per ArticlesG 25 of ECL) C"), I '~ acres f'P, I ~ acres Water Surface Area ~ ~ (~'~-/ acres t'--), ~X-t~ acres Unvegetated (Rock earth or fill) ~ acres .--t~:~ acres Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces . C} ~,~-c/ acres ~, T~'(-/ acres Other (Indicate typel [ O..~ (~ /, '~'~ ~ acres /, 7~-~ acres 'I~'Ru ral (non-farm) 3 What is predominant soil type(s) on proiect site? f~jl'~r'~(;t! ,t~;~ ..o..~ I.J~ I~,~ ( '~ ~(~) a Soil drainage ~Well drained % of site ~oderately well drained ~ %of site ~oorly drained ~ % of site b If any agricultural land is involve¢, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NYS Land C ass f cat on System? ~/~ acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ~Yes ~No a. What is depth to bedrock? ~ ~ ~/ (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project sitewith slopes: ~C~-10% ~) ' % ~0-15% ~ % C~Z5% or greater ~ % 6. Is project substantiaiFy contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? OYes 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site liste.d on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? OYes ~'No 8. What is the depth of the water table? ~- ~'~'~! (in feet) 9. Is site ocated over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? 'EYes ONo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell -fishing opportunities presently exist in the proiect area? '~,~es E3No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or ~njj~nal life that is identified as threatened of endangered? OYes ~-b~o According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations OYes ~o Describe 13. Is the project site I~resently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? OYes [~Xlo 'IT yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community.~ DYes ONo C,I['~ 15. Streams within or contiguous to pro~ect area: a Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland.~ ~____ ..areas within or contiggous to project area: 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities~ ~es ~No a) If Yes. does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection~ ~s DNo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection~ ~es ~No 18. Is th~ site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law. Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304~ ~Yes 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~s DNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes~ ~Yes ~No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a ~[otal contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor .~,~2~., acres b Project acreage to be develooed: ~), -~'d/ acres initially; O~ ~t_// acres ultimately. c. Proiect acreage to remain undeveloped ~)-~ ~:~acres. d. Length of project, in miles: ~,) I-)~ (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed ~ ~1~' %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ~ ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour ~ ~ {upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet)of largest proposed structure I~ ~-% height; fi~ j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare prolect will occupy ~s..,~r~ ft. Condominium 3 2. How much natural material [i.e.. rock. earth, etc.} will be removed from the site? tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? E~Yes ONo ]~/A a. f yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will toosoil be stockpiled for reclamation? EYes ENo c Wil upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? U]Yes ENo ~ 4 How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will he removed from site? acres. 5. Will any mature forest [over 100 years old) or other Iocall¥-importa. nt vegetation be removed bV this project? [Z]Yes J~o · 6 If single phase project: Antic) pared period of construction ¢g~:?,~ months, (including demolition), 7 if multi-phased: 1~ ~lg a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase I month year, (including demolition), c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year, d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? EYes ENo 8 Will blasting occur during construction? r~Yes 9 Number of jobs generated: durin~ construction /C'~ ; after prolect is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? I-lYes ~o If '/es, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes ~-~o a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will he discharged 13 Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [3Yes ;J~Uo Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? EYes Explain ;15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? I-lYes Ko 16. Will the project generate solid waste? E]Yes ~ a If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes. will an existing solid waste facility be used? EYes -1No c. If Yes, give name ; location d. Will an,/wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? I-lYes e. If Yes, explain E3No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? EYes a. If yes. what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years Will project use herbicides or pesticides? [3Yes ~o tons/month, 18. 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? E3Yes ~L~o 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? E3Yes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? E]Yes If yes . indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity /~//~, gallons/minute, 23. Total anticipated water usage per day ,/V//~ gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local State or Federal funding? E]Yes ~1o If Yes. explain 4 25. Approvals Required: Submittal Type Date City. Town, Village, Board OYes '~o City. Town. Village Planning Board OYes ~No City. Town Zoning Boar(! [~-Yes UNo City, Countx tle,dth Department,~ OYes ~No Other Local Agencies Other Regional Agencies []Yes ~No State Agencies 1~,?-~..~_'_'_'_'~,,.~.C.. ]~r'-Yes UNo Federal Agencies E3Yes C. Zoning and Planning Information I Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? [~Y-es. (No If Yes. indicate decision required: [zoning amendment ,.~zooing variance E~special use ~ermit []subdivision ~lsite plan Onewtrevision of master plan E/resource management plan Oother 2. What is the zoning cJassification(s)of the site? 3. What is the maximum potential d~velopment of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zomng of the site? ~'[ 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ,j~es 7 What are the predominant land use(s} and zoning classifications within a ~A mile radius of proposed action? 8 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a % mile? j~es 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land. how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action reouire any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? I~Yes ~lNo UNo 11 Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? E]Yes .'~o a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? OYes E3No 12 Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? []Yes j~o a. If yes. is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? [Yes INn D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project If there are or may he any adverse ~mpacts associated with yom proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them - ' E. Verification I certify that the ~formi~ti. op provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Spons~jhe ~ ~l~('~ ~,__~ ~--"~-CA,..S'~ ' -. ,~ Date ~""~IJL//C~R:~ , If the action is in ~e Coaslal Ar~nd you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form belore proceedin~ with this assessment. 5 Part 2-~PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General In[ormafion [Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided bY the euestion: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to he an expert environmental analyst · Identifying that an imoact wfl be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily sig~ificanL Any large impact must be evaluated in P~,RT 3 to determine s~gnificance. Identifying an ~mpact in ,:olumn 2 simply asks that it'be looked at further. · The Examples nrovided are. to assist the reviewer by showing t¥~es of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally a ~)plicable throughout the State and for most situations. But. for any specific pro] act or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The imu'acts of each proiect, on each site. in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples net ouestion does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider tong term. short term and cumlative effects Instruclions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2 Answer Yes if there will be any impact. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold eoua[s or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. f a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that sucl~ a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND I Will'the proposed action result in a physical change to the oroject site? E3NO E]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on sloops of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 [] foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than [] 3 feet. · Construction of 0aved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. [] · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within [] 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will continue for more than I year or involve more [] than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1.000 [] tons of natural material (i.e.. rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill [] · Construction in a designated floodway. [] · Other impacts [] I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By impact Impact Project Change [] []Yes I~No [] [] Yes [] No [] []Yes ~]No [] I-lYes []No [] I~Yes E~No [] []Yes []No r- []Yes []NO ~ E]Yes E3No- [] ~lYes []No 2 Will there be an effect to anv unique or unusual land forms found on the site~ [i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)E3NO ~YES · Specific land i~orms: [] []Yes ~No 6 IMPACT ON WATER 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15.24. 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) E]NO [OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredgin8 more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream · Extension of u~ility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland · Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact 3 [] [] 3 [] 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] [] [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change I~]Yes 3No ~Yes •No []Yes ON• ~]Yes •No [~Yes •No 4 Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? E]NO []]YES Examples that would apply,to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: []]Yes F1No [~Yes []No E3yes F~No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? nNO []]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project] action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with §rearer than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causin8 any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20.000 gallons per dav. · Prop•sea Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent [hat there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the stora~e of petroleum or chemical products ~reater than 1.100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses m areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial ~lnd;or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existin8 waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other impacts: 3 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 3 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] I~Yes •No []]]Yes []No []]Yes [-}No []]Yes []No []]Yes ON• []Yes ON• El]Yes •No [~]Yes []No []Yes ONo ~Yes r-]No []3Yes E]No []Yes ON• 6. Wil proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 3 E]Yes ON• 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Proiect Change · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action wil allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: [] [] J~]Yes ~lNo [] [] ~lYes [~No [] [] E]Yes [~No [] [] J~Yes E~]No IMPACT ON AIR 7 Will proposed action affect air quality? []NO E]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action wil induce 1.000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of refuse per hour · Emission rate ot total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 1'0 million BTU's per hour, · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: [] I-- J~Yes J~No [] [] EJYes E]No [] [] i-lYes ~No [] [] ~Yes [~No [] [] E]Yes I-INo [] [] [~]Yes i--INo IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8 Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endan§ered spe(~ies? ~]NO E]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list. usinE the site. over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year. other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: [] [] ~]Yes J~No [] [] J~]Yes EJNo: [] [] I-lYes J~No [] [] ~-]Yes J~No 9 Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ENO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migrator~, fish. shellfish or wildlife spec ~es · Proposed Action requires the removal of more that¥ 10 acres of mature forest [over 100 ,/ears o~ a~e) or other locally important vegetation IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Prooosed Action affect agricultural land resources? [NO E]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The proposed action would sever, cross or ILmit access to agricultural land [includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) [] [] J~Yes J~No [] [] J~Yes J~No [~] [] E~Yes E]No 8 · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural and or, if located in a~ Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems {e.g.~ subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches. strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e,g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: Small to Moderate Impact O O O 2 Potential Large Impact O O 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change OYes ~lNo OYes E~]No OYes [~No []Yes ~lNo IMPACT ON.. AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ON• OYES (if necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21. Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Pr•Dosed land uses. or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or s~gnificantlv reduce their enjo~ ment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or s~gnificant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area · Other impacts: [] [] O [] [] [] [] [] []Yes ON• OYes •No []Yes •No OYes •No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12 Wil Pr•Dosed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ENO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Pr•Dosed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur m an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory, · Other impacts: O [] O O O [] [] [] OYes ON• OYes ON• []Yes •No OYes •No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Pr•nosed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ON• OYES · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. · ^ major reduction of an open space important to the community. · Other impacts: [] [] [] O [] [] OYes []No OYes •No [~Yes [~No IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential 14 Will there be an effect to existin~ transportation systems? Moderate Large E~NO E~YES Impact Impact Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods, [] [] · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. [] [] · Other ~mpacts: [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change ~Yes []No []Yes []~o IMPACT ON ENERGY 15 Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? {~NO ~]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of [] any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy [] transmission or supply svsterrl to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use: · Other impacts: [] [] •Yes E]No 3 OYes []No [] []Yes []No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? E3NO I~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive [] facility, * Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). [] · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local [] ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures, · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a [] noise screen. · Other impacts: [] [] []Yes []No [] []Yes ~No [] C]Yes []No [] []Yes []No [] ~Yes []No iMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? []NO [YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous [] substances (i.e. oil, pesticides chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Prooosed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any [] form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, 'irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural [] gas or other trammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance [] within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. · Other impacts: [] 10 [] [] Yes [] No [] []Yes •No [] []Yes •No [] 3Yes []NO [] E]Yes []No I 2 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large 18 Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact [:]NO [3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the [] [] E~]Yes []No project is located is likely to grow by more than · The municipal budget for'capital expenditures or operating services [] [] []Yes []No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. [] [] []Yes r-]Nb · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. [] [] ~JYes ~No · Prooosed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures [] [] []Yes r-lNo or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services [] [] J-lYes --JNo (e.g. schools, police and fire. etc.) · Proposed Action will set at~ important precedent for future projects. [] [] []Yes []No · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. [] [] []Yes []No · Other impacts: [] [] []Yes [~]N6 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change 19. Is there, or s there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental im pacts? ~INO [~YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Parr 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact[s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefl~ describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change{s). 3 Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact o~currmg · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibilit¥, including permanently lost resoOrces of value · Whether the impact can o~ will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 FWW ID~ ~Wetlands listed below COMMENT = 55 Fisher's Island Conservancy LOCATION: Several Freshwater Wet]and Sites on Fisher's Island FIELD VISIT: Several BY: Steven J. Sanford, Mike Fishman & S.P. Lorence FINDINGS: ~he following wetlands should be added to the maps as wetlands of unusual local importance to wildlife. They meet the necessary crlteria as set forth in Sanford (1989) by: !) havin~ greater than 2 cover types 2) having opeD waLer 3) being contiguous to tidal wetlands Fisher's Is. Name of FWW Reasons for Conserv. Map~ Wetland I.D. addition 0030 Vine Swamp NL-13 0090 Lamborn's Pond NL-14 1,2 0110 old Man's Pond NL-9 1.2 0180 Hay Harbor Pond NL-12 1,2 0190 Ridgeway Pond & Swamp NL-3 0300 Lost Pond NL-4 1,2 0620 Water Works Pond West MY-2 1,2 0641 Hsris' Marsh MY-24 1.2~3 0650~ Rafferty Marsh MY-Q(portion removed-tidal) 0670 Murphy's Pond MY-9 0680 Nettie's Swamp " 1,2 0690 Tremain Swamp MY-26 !~2 0730 Cashell Marstl MY-25 1~2.3 0850 Laughlin's Swamp MY-3 1~2 0860 Noyes Ponds MY-27 1,2 0870 Oil Swamp '~ 1~2 0910 Sorrenson Swamp MY-28 0993 Cook Swamp MY-32 1000 Nature Conservancy Pond MY-30 1,2 1060 P~ng Pond MY-17 1~2 1070 Hungry Marsh " 1090 Reed Swamp MY-31 1,2 1110 Foul Swamp MY-18 2,3 1220 Water Pond MY-Z9 1,2 1280 Goose Pond MY-6 1,2,3 FWW ID: *Wetlands Listed Below COMMENT ~55 - Fisher's Is. Conservancy LOCATION: Fisher's Island Wetland nominations FIELD VISIT: Several BY: S.J. Sanford, M.S. Fishman S.P. Lorence EINDINGS: The following ms a list of wetlands nominated for protection by the Fisher's Is. Conservancy that are already on the freshwater wetland maps. Therefore, further action need be taken. no Fisher's Island FWW Conservancy = ID# 0050 NL-10 0060 " 0070 " 0130 NL-8 0140 " 0150 " 0160 NL-6 0170 0200 NL-3 0220 " 0230 NL-2 0240 " 0250 " 0260 NL-11 0270 " 0280 " 0290 NL-4 0300 0310 " 0330 NL-5 0340 " 0350 " 0360 " 0370 NL-7 0380 0420 " 0430 NL-1 0440 " -continued- Page 2. continued 0460 0470 0480 0490 0500 0510 0520 0521 0530 0540 0550 0560 0580 0590 0600 0610 0630 0640 0700 0710 0740 0780 0790 0800 0810 0820 0830 0850 0880 0890' 0920 0940 0970 0980 0996 1030 1040 1050 1080 1120 1130 1140 1150 1160 1190 1240 1250 1260 1270 1290 1300 MY-1 MY- 2 M¥-16 MY-10 MY-11 MY-21 MY-2 MY-3 MY-7 MY-12 MY-23 MY-3 MY-13 MY-8 MY-18 MY- 8 MY-19 MY-5 MY-6 I I'0 O~ J ./ L L~NI~: RE~SIONS DATE DESCRIPTION I DATE. APRIL 7, 1992 I SCALE: 1" = 20' SHEET 1 OF 1