Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-4486Board Of $outhold Town Trustees SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK PERMIT NO. /"//"ff~ ISSUED TO .......I~IG~OT,2~5. ALI~O DATE: ...6.179 Authorization Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 615 of the Laws of the State of New York, 1893: and Chapter 404 of the Laws of the State of New York t952: and the Southeld Town Ordinance en- titled "REGULATING AND THE PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and the REMOVAL OF SAND, GRAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;" and in accordance with the Resolution of The Board adopted at a meeting held on 19 95 , and in consideration of the sum of $.100.00 paid by NICHOLAS ALIANO of Gu:~chag~ ............ N.Y. and subject to the Terms and Conditions llsfed on the reverse side hereof, of Southold Town Trustees authorizes and permits the following: To remove and replace in same configuration 45 1.f. of exist. damaged foundation and place 10 c.y. of backfill, remove and replace in same configuration on east wung of motel 30 1.f. and 80 1.f. on west wingand fill with 10 c.)[. ?.n east and west wing~ as all in accordance with the detailed specificat, ons as presented in ~ub-Se originating application, mitred on plans. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees here- by causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date. RICPL~D G. WAleD Chairman GEORGE RITCI-IIE LATIqAM. JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKL JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town }{all, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax [516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 29, 1996 Louis A. Ckiarella Regional Manager, Bureau of Marine Habitat Protection New York State Department of Enviermental Conservation Building 40 - SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 RE: Storm Damage Permit (#1-4738-007tC/00001-0) Beachcomber Mete1, Cutehogue, Ny SCTM~ 1000-83-2-1, 2 & 17 Dear Mr. Chiarella, The PlalLuing Board has received your letter of June 23, 1995, in response to this Board's June 21, 1995, letter to Glenn Spetta Associates regarding the construction of a seawall au the above referenced property. In your letter you indicate that the sea wall is in full compliance with all regulations. The enclosed transcript of the Southold Town Board hearing of April 11, 1978, on Mr. Aliano's request for a zone change, (copy enclosed) clearly indicates that there was no sea wail as of the hearing date. Therefore, there is no preexisting grandfathered sea wall. This Board has pictures taken To show storm damage to the seaward side of the motel taken on January 8, 1993, that clearly shows the sidewalk on the beach, but no sea wall in existence on this date, yet yon indicate in your letter that the "repair" was completed in May of 1993! The Board would appreciate receiving a copy of the original DEC permit for the sea wal!. Incidently, a recent inspection by this Board on the "repaired" sea wall has shown it to have been damaged by a recent storm to the exxent of it being undermined on the east side and cracked on the west side. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Phone {516) 444-0295 Fax fi' (516) 444-0297 Michael D. Zagata Commissioner Mr. Richard Ward Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold. NY 11971 June 23. 1995 Dear Mr. Ward: Tt:ds responds to your June 13, 1995 letter to Glenn Spetta Associates which was copied to Charles Hamilton. regarding the construct/on of a seawall at the Beachcomber Motel. A field inspection conducted on June 21. 1995 and a search of Department records shows that a storm damage permit (#1-4738~00710/00001-0) was issued for the reconstruction of the damaged seawall/foundations on December 21. 1992. The wall was completed in May of t993. Examination of the permit, existing sire conditions and photos after ~e storm, shows that the reconstructed seawall and foundations are in full compliance. If you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate ro call me at the above number Sincerely, Louis A. Chiaretla Regional Manager, Bureau of Marine Habitat Protection Charles Hamilton Pond Enterprises, 11 Ashley Ln.. Shoreham_ NY 11786 jiJl~, 2 7 l~ /? f that I know i~. ALIJ~O: i have already told the Planning Board what my innention wasa I originally wan~ed co expand ~=nat i had. But since i made application am in danger of losing what i have, so zz won!d wind up a !-! bu5 i an~ not going ~o guarantee r. hat ail ~f a sudden ~ha= the sand ia going ~o come back again. otan no expand as needed, tt is strictly a seasonal motel ~-ype of operauion. _ am on!y open in the summer, i don'~ ge~ that winter business ~hat breaks uo the road. I am tau going to deal with that problem, chat is uo on Oregon Road, no wheres near me. ~R. BRL~N: Basically, what_ was interested in was uhzs expansion or whether it was primar!y for uhe replacing of ~u__d~n=~ ~. == ..... MR. ~_LiAN0: it is both, either, or. Time will tall as far as the exoansion. I don'~ exoec5 ~o e~and righ~ away~ tkk~ it can be done. ~viR. BRIJ~Y: Did you consider bulkheading? M_R. ALiAN0: Yes. i~ would cost me $30.000. and ~hera is no guarantee uhau the bulkhaading u%i! stay, I don'u have chat strong a footing is's a 22 year old building. So, if ! out $30,000. inmo aan'u ge~ nnsu~anca on buikheading, called mhe flood control people abouu in they will tau insure buikheading. Rambo & uhe ~ne from Graenpcr5 gave me orices of abou~ $30,000. would rather ~ake than $30,000, and ou= the building back and let this building fa!2 do~. It is amoun ready ~o go now. ~vL%_. BRIAN: Is that what you have in mind~' just letting the building fall dc~ ! mean, you won'c carc anything away? Mlt. ALtAN0: Well, I don't have any choice in the mac,er, i own enough proper~y in ~he surrounding area, I am cercainly nc~ going ~o have in dumped there, SUPERVISOR M~RTOCCHr_A: Is ~here anyone else who would like speak on the subject, in opposi=zon ~o this application? BILL WiL?IEL~: I would Like no make a sta~emen: in opposition. Since _ get the ~mpression that the primary effor~ here is ~o expand the facility, i have this oersona! ooinion ~hat i don'= 5kink iz would be 5o the ~dvannage-of the co~rm~uminy =o have suck a large ennerprise d~ nnere_ SUPERVISOR M~KTOCCHL~: Is ~here anyone eisa who wishes no soeak zn opposition ~o ~his application? (There was no response.) New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Phone (5161 444-0295 Fax # (516} 444-0207 Michael D. Zagata Commissioner June 23. 1995 Mr. Richard Ward Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board P,O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Ward: LT0~~0LD[ This responds to your June 13. 1995 letter to Glenn Spetta Associates which was copied to Charles Hamilton. regarding the construction of a seawall at the Beachcomber Motel. A field inspection conducted on June 21, 1995 and a search of Department records shows that a storm damage permit (#1-4738-00710/00001-0) was issued for the reconstruction of the damaged seawall/foundations on December 21. 1992. The wall was completed in May of 1993. Examination of the permit, existing site conditions and photos after the storm, shows that the reconstructed seawall and foundations are in full compliance. If you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to call me at the above number Sincerely, Louis A. Chiarella Regional Manager, Bureau of Marine Habitat Protection CC: Charles Hamilton Pond Enterprises, 11 Ashley Ln.. Shoreham, NY 11786 JIJN 2 ? ~995 Projection Of Water Water Water Tra~s~o~ Long IsJ~n~ Wells j A~icle ~5, TRle 27: i::~ Wl~d, Scenic and Recreational ~ivers ,;~ ~NYCRR 608: L--'-'~ Article 17', Tit/es 7, 8: ~'~_ Ar~tcJe 19: ~ A~ic~e 23, Title 27: ~ A~cte 27, T~tte 7; 6NYC~R 3~0: · ~ Article 27, Title 9; 8NYC~R 373: Hazardous Waste Management ~ Article 34: Coastal Erosion Management ~ A~lc~e 38: Roodp~ain Management ~ A~c~es 1, 3, I7, 19, 27, 37; ~ Other: 8y acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees that the permit is contingedt u~on strict compNa~ce with the ECL, ail ap~ qc~ble regui~t one, ~he Oe~erz[ CondiUons specfffed (See Reveres Side) add any ~ec~J ~n~i~on~ included a~ pa~ of this ~ermit ~I~M~T ~O~tsrg~tOa j ~OO~S Regulatory Z~ ~rs - Re,iota One, ~ld~. 40 S~ I Robert A. Greem~ ~ S~omy Brook. ~.Y. ] ]790-~356 -',St. ate Depart .ment of Environmen~'~j Cd'nservation Building*~40--SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 (516) 751-1389 FAX {516) 7'51-3839 Thomas C, Jotllng Commissioner April Dear Permittee: A permanent identification number has been assigned to the permit which authorizes you to repair damage resulting from the December, 1992, Nor'easter. The new number is shown on the Notice of Receipt of Application. Please refer to this number in any future correspondence regarding your permit. If you have any questions or require assistance regarding your permit, please contact the person ~nose name appears on the Notice of Receipt of Application. Thank you. Very truly yours~ Robert A. Greene Regional Permit Administrator Region One SUPPLEMENTARY SPECIAL CONDITIONS The following conditions apply to all permits: A. If any of the permit conditions are unclear,the permittee shall con- tact the Division of Regulatory Affairs at the address and telephone noted below. A copy of this permit with supplementary conditions and approved plans shall be available at the projeot site whenever authOrized work is in progress. The permit sign enclosed with the permit or a copy of letter of approval shall be protected from the weather and posted.in a con- spicuous location at the work site until completion of authorized work. De At least 48 hours prior to commencement of the project, the permittee shall complete and return the top portion of the enclosed receipt form certifying that he is fully aware of and understands all provisions and conditions of this permit. Within one week of completion of the permitted work, the bottom portion of that form shall also'be com- pleted arid returned. For projects involving activities to be accomplished over a period of more than One year, the permittee shall notify the Regional Permit Administrator in writing at least 48 hours prior to the commencement of resumption of work each year. If project design modifications take place after permit issuance, the permittee shall submit the appropriate plan changes for approval by the Regional Permit Administrator prior to undertaking any such modi- fications. The permittee is advised that substantial modification may require submission of a new application for permit. i G. All necessary precautions shall be t~ken to preclude contam~ngtlon of ~ any wetlands or waterway by suspended solids, sediment, fuels, ~ solvents, lubricants, epoxy coatings, paints, concrete, leachate or ~ any other environmentally deleterious materials associated with the ~ project work. Any failure to comply precisely with ail of the terms and conditions of this permit, unless authorized in writing, shall be treated as a violation of the Environmental Conservation Law. The permittee is advised to obtain any permits or approvals that may be required from the U.S. Department of Army Corps of Engineers, NY District, 26 Federal Plaza, New York, NY 10278, (Attention: Regulatory Functions Branch), prior to commencement of work authorized herein. The granting of this permit does not relieve the permittee of the respoosibility of obtaining a grant, easement, or other necessary approval from the Division of Land Utilization, Office of General Servlces~' Tower Building, Empire State Pla~a, Albany, NY 12242, which may be required for any encroachment upon State-owned lands underwater. Regional Permit Administrator NYS Dept of Environmental Con~ervation Bldg. 40, SUNY-Room 219 Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 (516) 751-~89 TIiUSTEES John M. Bredemeycr, III, Presiflem Albe~ J. Krupski~ Jr., Vice President Henry P. Smith John B, Tuthiil ' WitIiam G, Alber~son Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOAIU) OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SO UT.I-tOLD StJi'ERVISOI~. SCOTT L, HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREA AND TOWN WETLAND EMERGENCY AUTHORIZATION(S) Applica%ion No. SCTM .~1000- Name: Date: Dece~er 21, 1992 RESOLVED uhat pursuant to the Town Code in relation to Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas, Chapter 37, Section 20, 21 and Town Code Chapter 97, Wetlands, the Southold Town Trustees, as Administrator, have determined that the activities proposed by your emergency activity request are necessary to protect proper~y and important coastal natural resources. DESCRIPTION OF Aw~I~N. , , ,. Reasons supportin~ this determznat~on: 1. An on site inspection has been conducted by the board of Trustees or their authorized representative. 2. The Trustees have considered the emergency request and find that if the ~ork is not completed as authorized and measurable loss of property and important coastal natural resources is likely to occur. This authorization is not a permit. You must complete =he Coastal Erosion and wetland permit process where applicable for all authorizations given under this section. This authorization should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency. FORMNO, I TOWN OF SOUTH~LD TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD. N.Y. 11971 TEL,; 765-1802 ~isapproved a/c ..................................... (Building Inspector) APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Date ,., FO2tl ............ CALL HA~L TO: INSTRUCTIONS a. Tltis application must be completely filled in by' typewr/ter erin ink and submitted to the B~ilding Inspector, with sets of'plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildL'~gs on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streek or areas, and giving a detailed descrip¢on of layout of property must be drawn on the diagram .wilier is part of this appli. cation. ' · c. The work covered by tbJs application may not be commenced before issuance of Bui/ding Permit. d. Upon approval of this app!icat.;on, the Building Inspector will issued a Building Permit to the applicant. Stzch permit shall be kept on the premises avau,ble for knspection throu.ahout ti~e work. e, No building shall be occupied or mod in whole or in part for any purpose whatever until a Certificate of Occupancy shall have been granted by the Building Inspector. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of S0utbold, Suffolk· County, New. York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or Regulations, for the construction of bulidings, additions or alterations, or for removal or demolition, as herehq described. The applicant agrees to comply with a,'l applicable laws, ordinances, building code, housing code, and regulations, and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in build/rig for necessary inspections.. , , /~ i ' I/I,. 0.. 0..,., \ ...... ; ......... V.k.k,~/. ,---/ ............... --' (Signature of applicant, or name, if a corporation) ./'Z..-' · /0. 7 .-/ ..... ~--'-' .' (Ma/Ling address of applicant) t State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder. ~ame of owner of premises ad .!,~ .C, ,W- .% (as on the tax roil or latest deed) f appJicant is a ~orporation, signature o~duly authorized officer. (Name and title of corporate officer) Builder's License No Plumber's License No ......................... Electric, inn's License No ....................... Other Trade's License No ...................... Location of land on which proposed work will be'done ........... ' ................................... i)c, ct-o/ ........................ ................................... ................... Itouse Number Street ':::mty TaxMapNo, I000 Section ,t. Block ' /. Lot ..... ~ .>division .................. Filed Map No ............... Lot ............... (Name) State existing use and occupancy of premises and iritendcd use and occupancy of proposed construction: d cy /k~.~. a. Existing t~se an occupsn ................................................ ~ ............... b, Intended use and occupancy ...................... ; ............................................. Nature f~ h~ b) ~ . ........ Repair . oth.,r Work ............. Estimated Cost ........................ Fee ............................ (to be paid on fiFng this apphc,tion) If dwelling, number of dwelling Units ............... Number of dwelling un/ts on each floor ............... , If garage, number of cars ......................................................... ~ .......... If business, commercial or mi,,xed occupancy specify nature and extent of each type of use . ../~. ~/, Dimcns'ons of ex'sting structures Zany Front Rear Depth Height ............... Number of Stories ....................................................... Dimensions of s,4me structure with ~lterations or additions: Front ................. Rear ...... Depth Height ' . '.. Number of Stories Dimensions of entire new construction: Front ' Rear Depth Height ............... Number of Stories ................. · ......' ............... ~,.~ ,. .... : ' .>oC .. . . S~ze of lot: Front~r-2, [ ........... ',. Rear ,_ . ., Date of Purchase '/?'F~ 'Q ................. Name of Former Owner . ~ ¢.. O.o,.-.o.; .~ .......'rt,: ~-~ ,~5 .... : Zone or use district in width premises are situated /¢qo~4'.D/ . Does proposed construction vie!ate an3' zoning law, ordnance or regulation: .4,,! .O. ........................ ,r~-~ Will lot be regraded .... /~.~.'. .............., ....... Will excess fill be removed £ro:LB,oz~,iies: Yes [ Nc> Nam e of Owner of premises ,//!c.~. ~. ~. ?.4',,./~ ~.t.~. ~.O. Address . t (;/9 ~f~l~[gf ~. ,~.,J~g~.~e No. 7 f, ff~/."/. Nm e of Contra for ....t[j 5~.~.../3t ............. Add~,ss ..... [ . .~... f .'~,.. ~/. Phone No. , ' Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal Wetland? ,/*Yes,d~.. .... N° ......... · '. *If yes, Southold Town Trustees Permit may be re~e~'-" .,. PLOT DIAGRAM Locate clearly and distinctly all buildings, whethe'r existing or proposed, and, indicate all ~et-back dir,.ensions from property IJnes. Give street and block number or description according to deed, and show Street names and indicate whether in terior or collier Jo t, · .~.,~_-----~- OF NEW.,YOR[,?.~L_. o t. ~ , ....... (Na~ of individual signing contract) he ............ ~ . .~ ~ ¢' ' ~nh~ctor, agent, corporate officer, etc.) owner or owners, and is duly m~thorh~d ~o perform or have performed the said work and to m~e and file this ~ion; that ali statements contained in {ms apphca~ on are true to Ihe best vfh~s knowledge and belief; and that the 5~ be performed in the rammer set forth in tbs application Eled therewith. to before me this Oua~/fi~ i~ Suffolk Coun~ ~ ~ FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hal! Southold, N.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No Z-22342 Date MAY 19, 1993 THIS CERTIFIES that the building REPAIR Location of Property 3800 DUCK POND ROAD CUTCHOGUE, House No. Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 83 Block 2 Lot Subdivision Filed Map No~ Lot No. confor~ substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated APRIL 5, 1993 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 21307-Z dated APRIL 6, 1993 was issued, and conforms to all of the r~quir~ments of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is REPAIR WOrK ON MOTEL.EAST~ RESTAURANT & MOTEL WEST CAUSED BY WINTER STORMS. The certificate is issued to of the aforesaid building. POND ENTERPRISES, INC. (owners) SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL N/A UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. N/A PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED N/A Rev. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, No Yo BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) Permission is hereby granted to: .- , ........................ ~....~ ................. ~.~ ...... c...., ...................................................... ....... ............................. ~3 '~. ,, ~. . ................................................ .C. ...... co,,~ ~,~ ~ ~. ~ooo s~,o~ ..~....J ........... ~=~ ........ ~f~ ....... ~ ~ ....................... pu~uont ~o opp~cot~on dot~ ~/-~ .... ~ ~ 19.~ ond opprov~ by the Building Inspector. Fee $...Z ...~, · ,~,/. · .~,'~.,. Building Inspector Rev, 6/30180 (516) 734-6370 (516) 744-1448 "Member · Long ]alend ?ourlsm & Convention CommllllOW' Resort Motel & Restaurant DEPOT LANE ON L.I, SOUND R.R, #1, BOX 161 H CUTCHOGUE N.Y 11935 , , c¢ ,.~ -" / - ' ' acatlon Paradise on Long Island Sound DONALD G, FELLER ', ARCHITECT $00 Ole Jule Lane · Mat~tuck, NY 11952 · (~1~) 295-5250 April 1, 1993 Mr. Nick Aliano Sr. l~ Asnly Lane Sboreham, New York Re: STORM DAMAGE REPAIR OF ALIANO'S BEACHCOMBER MOTEL Duck Pond Lane, Cutchogue, New York Architectural ~ ~vi beg ces: Plans and prints $300. I. ON~ i~L~,'vo $outvo NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVA~flON POND ENTERPRISESINC 11 ASHLEY LN SHOREHAM NY 11786 NOTICE OF RECEIPT OF APPLICA'fiON The Division of Regulatory Affairs has received the application referenced below, The material submitted is being reviewed by staff, and you will be advised in writing regarding the Department's findings. In all future communications, please refer to the Application ID number. Application ID: 1-4738-00710/00001.0 Date Received: 12/21/92 Applicant: POND ENTERPRISES INC Facility: POND ENTERPRISES Description: STORM DAMAGE - 45 LINEAR FT-10 CU ¥DS-30 FT-80 FT DEC Contact: KAREN A MUNZE .i~qSPECTOR~ : ~ ~,~.'~'Victor Les~a. rn~ ecto~ :ipal Bulk{lng ! ~P · ' Ctfrtis Horton Thomas Fisher Bui~ing lmpecr~ Gary Fish Building lnspect~ Vincent R. %'ieczorek Ordi~e Inwect~ Robert Fisher Assis~nt Fire Inspectm Telephone (516) 765-1802 NOTICE OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 90 OF THE CODE OF THE TO~ OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS, Supervisor Southold Town Hall P.O. Box 1179, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 DATE: March 24, 1993 TO: Pond Enterprises, Inc. Nicholas Aliano Ashley Lane Shoreham, N.Y. 11786 The last Assessment Roll of the Town of Southold shows that you are the owner of the following described premises. ALL that certain plot~ piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being in the Town of Southold, Hamlet of Cutchogue, County of Suffolk and State of New York being bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the easterly side of Duck Pond, distant 178.70 feet northerly from a monument set at an angle on the easterly side of Duck Pond Road, where the same turns from a. northerly and southerly direction to a northeasterly and southwesterly direction~ which monument is about 3400 feet easterly from the Oregon Road; and from said point of beginning; RUNNING THENCE North 20 degrees 54 minutes 10 seconds West, a distance of 280 feet to the highwater mark of Long Island Sound; THENCE along the highwater mark of Long Island Sound a distance of 300 feet on a tie line with a bearing of North 56 degrees 15 minutes 50 seconds East, to the point where the highwater mark of Long Island Sound is intersected by the Westerly side of land, now or formerly of McBride; THENCE along said mentioned land, South 33 degrees 44 minutes 10 seconds East, a distance of 273.01 feet to a point; THENCE along land, now or formerly of McBride, South 56 degrees 15 minutes 50 seconds West, a distance of 362.19 feet to the easterly side of Duck Pond Road at the point or place of BEGINNING. The above described premises are the same premises described in a deed recorded in the Suffolk County clerk's Office in Liber 6864 Page 276. Also referred to as: Suffolk County Tax Map Designation: District 1000, 'Section 83 Block 2 Lot 1. B. The Motel and Restaurant located on your property structurally unsafe and dangerous and as such constitutes a hazard to safety by reason of In particular: 4 x 4 Posts and Footings supporting 2nd story decks are eroded away. Also a portion of the foundation under the restaurant has been washed away by wave action. Both locations are on the north side of each building. C. You are hereby ordered to: Restore and Repair decks and foundations on the water side (north side) so as to make them safe and structurally sound. D. The above work shall commence within ten (10) days from the date of service of this notice and shall be completed within thirty (30) days thereafter. E. In the event you fail to comply with the above, a hearing will be held before the Southold Town Board concerning same at 9:30 o'clock A.M. on May 4, 1994 at Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971. F. In the event that the Southold Town Board after the haaring herein shall determine that the building or structure is unsafe or dangerous to the public, the Town Board may order the building or structure to be repaired and secured or taken down and removed. G. In the event that the building or structure shall be deter- mined by the Town to be unsafe or dangerous and in the event of the neglect or refusal fo the owner to repair or remove the same within the time provided, the Town may remove such building or structures by whatever means it deems appropriate and assess all costs and expenses incurred by the Town in connection with the proceedings to remove or secure, including the cost of actually removing said building or structure, against the land on which said buildings or structures are located. Building Inspector Form No. 6 TOW~ OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN HALL 765-1802 /~PPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY This application must be fllled in by typewriter OR ink and submitted to the building inspector with the following: for new building or new use: 1. Final survey of property with accurate location of all buildings, property lines,' · 'streets, and unusual natural or topographic features. 2. Final Approval from Health Dept. of water supply and sewerage-disposal(S-9 form). 3. Approval of.electrical installation from Board of Fire Underwriters. 4. Sworn statement from plumber certifying that the solder used in system contains less than 2/10 of 1% lead. 5. Commercial building, industrial buiiding, multiple residences and similar buildings and installations, a certificate of Code Compliance from architect or engineer responsible for the building. '6. Submit Planning Board Approval of completed site plan requirements. ~or existing buildings (prior to April 9, 1957) non-conforming uses, or buildings and '!,pre-existing" land uses: ~. Accurate survey of property showing ell property lines, streets, building and unusual natural or topographic features. 2. 'A properly completed application and a consent to ,inspect signed by the applicant. If a Certificate of Occupancy is denied, the Building Inspector shall sta£e the reasons therefor in writing to the applicant; Fees t, Certificate of Occupancy - New dw~lting $25.00, Additions to dwelling $25.00, Alterations to dwelling $25.00, Swimming pool $25.00, Accessory building $25.00, Additions to accessory building $25°00. Businesses $50.00. 2. Certificate of Occupancy on Pre-existing Building - $100.00 3. Copy of Certificate of Occupancy - $5.00 over 5 years - $10.00 4. Updated Certificate of Occupancy - $50.00 5. Temporary Certificate of Occupancy - Residential $15.00, Commercial $15.00 ' Date Construction ........... Old Or Pre-existing BuildSng..~.. ........... tion Pro e 't ........ ,O0 d ' House No. ~ Street Hamlet r or Owners of roperty ................... [% .............................................. ~y Tax Map No 1000~ Section .... .......... Block .............. Lot.. ~visiom ............................ ...... F~ ed Hap ............ ...................... Appxican~ ..... ~' . ~ Underwriters Aoproval h Dept. Approval .............................................. lng Board Approval .......... ' .............. st for: Temporary Certificate ........... Final erticare APPLI~&NT ' __ ..... i ................. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Bennett OdowskL Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L, Edwards Town Halt. 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax [516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 13, 1995 Glenn Spetta Associates Environmental Consultants 1050 Smithtown Ave. Bohemia NY 11716 Re: Beachcomber Motel Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-83-2-1, 2 & p/o 17 Dear Mr. Spetta: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, June 12, 1995: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board deems the Draft Environmental Impact Statement of March 1995 to be incomplete, therefore unacceptable for the purpose of g coordinated rewew pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act The DEIS was deemed incomplete for the following reasons: Specific information re(; uired in the Scoping Session is either missing, or incon- sistent. The enclosed report from our consultant itemizes the information that must be supplied. In addition, it has been brought to the Board's attention that the applicant has not complied with the Southold Town Trustees' emergency repair authorization which was issued on December 21, 1992: in that a full permit application has not been submitted [o the Trustees. Further, there ~s no record in the Town's files of the issuance of a permit for the Page 2 Proposed site Dian for Beachcomber Motel June 13, 1995 concrete retaining ~vall that has been placed on the beach north of the motel. Our understanding is that both Town Trustee and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation permits were required for this work. It will be necessary for thes~ potential violations permit deficiencies to be discussed within the DEIS document before we can deem it complete. The site plan that is part of the DEIS must be revised to show the new retaining walls and the revised ground elevations between the restaurant and motel buildings and shoreline. Finally, the DEIS must address the concerns set forth in the staff report of June 12, 1995. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Richard G. Ward Chairman cc: eric. Henry Raynor, Agent for the Applicant Board of Trustees rxlYSDEC, Permit Section, Charles Hamilton Charles Voorhis, Voorhis and Associates PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Bennett Odowski. Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall. 53095 Main :{oad P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (5161 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: DATE: PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Richard G. Ward, Chairman Members of the Planning Board Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Beachcomber Motel, Proposed Expansion of SCTM ~ 1000-83-1.2 S p/o 17 Cutchogue, NY June 12, 1995 h~ reading the DEIS, six concerns came to mind, which the text did not address or answer: The propsed drainage for the site involves the placement of a bubble-type overflow facility just behind the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line. The DEIS does not discuss the potential environmental impacts of placing this facility at this site. Nor does the document address the wisdom of placing an overflow basin within the A7 flood zone. Three of the four proposed buildings will be located within the A7 zone. However. the DEIS document and the site plan do not indicate if the ground will be built up to the recjuired elevation |11') or whether the buildings will be elevated above ground. The proposed layout will require regrading and stabilization of the east slope and bluff, which is vegetated with xeric species. The DEIS does not provide much detail about how this will be accomplished or mitigated· Further. Alternative C would require less regrading and stabilization in this sensitive area; a fact that is given short shrift in the text. thus making it difficult to assess the relative environmental sensitivities of the two proposed ~ayouts. The site diagram that accompanied the archeologlcal review text was difficult to compare with the site plan because of its lack of scale, Placement of the test sites on the site plan itself would facilitate assessment of the Stage 1 survey, Also. Stage lB, resulted in the finding of flakes and tools near the basketball court, and along the route of the extension of the road and parking area. The items found might indicate habitation of the site by native Americans. However, the text did not explain why Stage lB testing was not conducted here, even though this area is proposed to be regraded for the road and parking spaces The document does not consider the selective retraction of the existing building and portions of buildings lying seaward of the Coastal Erosion Hazard llne. In 1978, the applicant had requested a change of zone of additional property in this location in order to provide for such a retreat (ms quoted in Town Board minutes). Perhaps the retreat could be incorporated into the expansion plans? The proposed and the alternate site layouts discussed in the report are not compatible with the drainage and slope conditions on the site. The DEIS could explore alternative design layouts that work with the constraints of the site in a more acceptable environmental manner; one that requires less regrading and disturbance of the slopes. These comments are made in addition to the observations made by our environmental consultant, Charles Voorhis, in his report of May 26, 1995. I endorse Mr. Voorhis' comments, and recommend their acceptance. cc: Robert Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer CHARLES VCt6>-!~t~ ,~SOCIATES, INC. E N VI R O N M E NT~,,~.N~[~/,/~' ~!,~'~G CONSuLTANts Mr. Richard G. Ward, Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Beachcomber Motel Review of Draft BIS Dear Mr. Ward:: April26,1995 We have completed our review of the above referenced Draft EIS. This review is completed Lq order to determine that the basic content of the Draft, E!S is consistent -~5th ~l~e ~.e~ping out!k~e and meeting held with regard to the proposed project. In addition, review ha~.been conducted to determine the adequacy of the document for inter-agency and public review in accordance with DraR EIS procedures contained in SEQRA Part 617. First, I would like to point out that the site design of the project has been slgnificanfly amended to address previous concerns. The Board issued a Positive Declaration based on this and a number of issues including disturbance of steep slopes, water supply, conformance with Article 6 of the Sanitary Code, intended use of other lands and how the project fits inthe context ofother lands, traffic and other less significant issues. Since that time, the proposed number of units has been reduced from 86 units in 8 buildings to 46 units in 4 buildings. Units have been moved from the areas with the steepest slopes, and mitigation of slope impacts are proposed. Therefore'at this time, I believe it is important to have the Draft EIS submission complete, in order to maintain the option that if there are no substantive comments on the Draft ElS, and the Board is satisfied with the site design plan, there could be an opportunity to issue a Negative Declaration based on the Draft ElS at the close of the comment period. This would forego the Final EI8 process and could save considerable time for the applicant. With this in mind, I offer the following cotmnents. Once these comments are incorporated rotc the document, I believe the EIS will be complete and adequate for decision making, provided ti~ere are no additional substantive comments fi-om the Flanning Board, involved agencies or the public, that would require response in a Final EIS. Comments provided are referenced to the appropriate page number of the Draft EIS. In addition, all review comments made in reference to the SEQR Seeping Checklist, specifically refers to that checklist as "Amended February 22, 1993 Including Seeping Meeting Issues." As a general comment, since there was never any verbal mention in the DEIS of permanent or transitory structures on the existing farm, and since Figure I-2 depicts a square-like structure directly on the area of property designated as farmland, it would be helpful ifa few details were provided that discuss this structure. The specific issue is whether this structure (or other structures not noted) will place additional demands on the proposed action's overall sanitary design flow as related to compliance with Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary If it is indeed the intention of the applicant to continue 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD. SUITE 2 MILLER PLACE. NY 11764 - (516) 331-1455 ',' FAX 331-8046 Beachcomber Estates H Review of Draft ElS renting a desiganted portion of the land for fanning use, determination of design flow compliance must bo provided, sinea these structures eau affect project compliance. The applicant should state whether or not fanning will continue on the subject property. The combination of fainting and sanitary flow for the existing and proposed motel units will cause a signitleant elevation of nitrogen in recharge, particularly during the summer season. In addition, detem~aafion should be made as to the applicability of Health Department criteria relating to combined farm and motel use regarding At~tiele 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. 3. Page 1-5 of the DEIS, C., Erosion Control. line 2, there is a misspelled word - "protion." Page 1-6 of the DEIS, the statement "...will not cause saltwater intrusion to the water supply nor impact groundwater quality in this area," provides no substantive detail in reaching this conclusion. As a, matter of fact, and as it is stated later on in the DEIS, saltwater intrusion is stated to already exist in a nearby well. The document does not provide any refillable identification .of a fresh/saltwater i~tefface location. The document should make refei-enc~ to this nmtter while also mf6rrkng the reader to page 3-13 of the DEIS for more information. The Description of the Proposed Project section should provide details necessary to address the i~SDEC review letter of December 7, 1992 (included in Appendix D-53} or indicate mitigation incorporated into the project that may address NYSDEC comments. Page 1-7 of the DEIS, what is presently cited as "(Figure 7- )" should be recorded as (Figure 7-1). Additionally on this page, 3., what is cited as "(Figure 7- )" should be recorded as [Figure 7-2). Page 2-1 of the DEIS, refers to 30.8 acres of farmland; however, other portions of the document refer to 32 acres of farmland. This discrepancy should be corrected. Page 2-6, Table 2-2 - Sit~ Data in the DEIS, does not address all the requests cited in the "Design & Layout" section of the Amended Scoping Checklist. The document, under 3., Parking, a., Pavem_e~ Area, it is difficult to determine if the paved area, as listed by the preparer under Proposed Land Uses {on page 2-6), refers specifically to site coverage. If this paved area of 0.4 acres (0.8% of the site) does indeed refer to the nurnber of parking stalls (103) listed above it, please note it as such. Page 2-8 of the DEIS, should note that the balance of the 48.2 acre site must not be used for additional development in order to comply with Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sahib)' Code, unless public water is supplied or a sewage treatment plant is constructed. 10. The Approvals section, page 2-12 of the DEIS does not conform with the request as noted in the Amended Seoping Checklist. Please indicate the status of required permits. In addition, this application was pending with the NYSDEC in 1993. Site activities appear to still be in NYSDEC jurisdiction, yet NYSDEC is not listed as a.permtting agency. I1. Page 3-9 of the DEIS does not describe (as is required by the Scoping Checklist on page 3, Section W, A., 3.) slopes pamcularly on east mdc of rote. 12. On page 3-13 of the DEIS (bottom of page), mention is made of a drinking water well that beeame salty and where, 'qdae salhvater interface is not at a great depth." This well should be identified and any further information regarding the saltwater intrusion of this well cited. Beachcomber Estates H Review of Draft ElS 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Page 3-17 of the DEIS (bottom of page), the document mentions that, "proper contingencies must be taken to treat aldiearb if the need arises." However, there is no mention as to what these proper contingencies are. Please elaborate on this matter. Page 3-21 of the DEIS, first line, "It should be planned that treatment may be necessary for the removal of dichloropropane, as well." What exactly are the applicants actual plans for this ocourrence? A basle plan of aotion should be stated. Page 3-34 o£the DEIS, second paxagraph, the document states that, "early colonizing plants found in this portion of the property were: conunon lamb's-quarters, conunon purslane..." These plant types, as the document states, axe found fxom a list in Appendix C-2, yet the plants are not listed in this Appendix. Page 3-37 of the DEIS. second paragraph, last sentence, states, "It is anticipated that other species not identified during sampling sessions such as opossum, red fox, mice, and chipmunks also may utilize the site and are additionally listed in Appendix C-4." When consulting Appendix C-4, it notes (by means of an asterisk - *) that red fox was "Identified on Site." This information is not consistent and should be corrected accordingly. Page 5 of the Amended Seeping Cheeldist, Section IV, C., 3, b., asks the applicant to discuss the benefits of the existing wetiand, such as flood and erosion control, and recreation. Page 3-47 of the DEIS, 3., c., Fire Protection. refers to a letter provided by the Cutchogue Fire District (Matthew J. Maxtin, Secretary) which appears in Appendix D-57 and states, '~ae Cutehogue Fire Department feels that it eaunot provide adequate fire protection for this site. The water supply in that area ~s inadequate to handle that many units and without a site plan we cannot detenulne the actual water requirements and access. If you can provide us with a site plan we will be happy to continue the study." Please provide a copy of the site plan to the Cutchogue Fire Department and update the DEIS as needed to incorporate further information from the Fire Deparmaent. Section IV.A.2 (page 4-3) should include discussion regarding Water quantity issues as well as water qual~ty. Additional information should be provided on the well system, and expected salt-water intrusion or upeoning. Well installation should be compared with standards supplied in Table 3-2 on page 3-17 to determine conformanea with design recommendations. The impact of faxming on site recharge should be discussed under scenarios if fanulng continues or ceases. Page 4-4 of the DEIS, discusses potential adverse impacts to groundwater quality due to nitrogen loading. The source of nitrogen in recharge estimates in mg/1 and nitrogen loading in pouads/day should be provided. The reference to 5.6 mg/1 nitrogen in recharge should indicate that tiffs value is based on recharge over the entire site, and does not include consideration of farm nitrogen. Nitrogen load referenced on page 4-6 does not agree with our computations. Based on a farm application rate of 160 pounds/acre (page 4-41 and sanitmy nitrogen of 30 mg/l, the nitrogen load from the farm and existing motel should be in the range of 8.9 pounds/day. The proposed project without active farming would be in the range of 3.7 pounds/day, and with active farming it would be 10.7 pounds/day. Appropriate conclusions should be made based on revised estimates. Please indicate the siggtificance of elevated nitrogen in relation to water supply and discharge to surface water. Page 3 Beachcomber Estates Review of Draft ElS 21. Page 4-6 of the DEIS, indicates that an impact oft. he project is discontinuance of fanuing; however, the description of the project does not clearly indicate if this is part of the proposed prOject. Instead, page 2-1 seems to indicate that faming will enntinue if allowed. 22. Page 4-7 of the DEIS, makes reference to an Appendix of plants and shrubs used to attract birds and other wildlife; however, the appendix is not incindcd, 23. Page 4-8 of the DEIS, makes reference to a matrix of habitat requirements for avifauna, yet no such appendix appeurs in the document. 24. Page 4-10 of the D EIS, c., Fire Protection. please elaborate (other than just citing a correspondence in the appendix} on the "concerns" of the Cutchogue Fire Department. 25. Please provide a more detailed statement regarding the mitigating measures employed to reduce nitrogen loading on the site, on page 5-3 of the DEIS. Be sure to include scenarios with and without farming, l'his section should also indicate that as mitigation, the applicant will not conduct additional development on the 48.2 acre site until public water is available or a sewage treatment plant is constructed. Mitigation concerning salt-water intrasion/upenning should be discussed, particularly where discretion in the operation of the system is required (i.e. alternate well pmnping, etc.). 26. Page 5-4 should includemitigafion proposed to offset impacts regarding fire protection. 27. The Adverse Environmental Effects ]laat Cannot Be Avoided section of the DEIS (page 6-1), does not specifically mention the loss of 0.2 acres of relatively mature trees for the purposes of well extension. ]lxis fact should be cited accordingly. 28. Table 7-1 on page 74 should be amended to address nitrogen loading as per the appropriate comments provided above. In addition, based on current values included on page 4-6 of the DEIS, the reference at the bottom of the page should be 2,90 instead of 2.85 pounds/day. Thank you for the opportunity to provide these comments on the Drat't EIS for Beachcomber Estates. As noted in tho opening of this letter, it is recommended that comments be incorporated into the text of the Draft EIS for resubmission to the Planning Board. The review of the revised document would be expedited if the preparer could submit a reviewers copy, noting the specific areas where the document has been anaended to address these comments. Once these comments are addressed to the satisfaction of the Board, the document can be ckculated for coordinated review. As noted, if there are no substantive comments on the Draft ElS, and the Board is satisfied with the site plan, there is a possibility to issue a Negative Declaration based on the accepted Draft EIS. Please feel free to call if you have may questions. Ve~ tru~ly~ygur, s~~ ~ ~., Charles J. Voorhis, CEP, AiCP cc: Robert Kassner Page 4 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Serge Do3en, Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Telephone (516) 765-1809 Jr. Mr. Henry E. Raynor, 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 28, SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Re: Aliano, Krupski & Pond 1992 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 IOWN OF $OUTHOLD Enterprises, Inc. Dear Mr. Raynor: In response to your letter requesting a date of a hearin~ in the above motel projects, please be aware that we are unable to estimate or confirm a hearing date until the following has been accomplished (see ZBA letters of February 28, 1992 and June 30~, 1992): a) Declaration of Significance or Non-Significance by the Southold Town Planning Board under the SEQRA process {we believe that the SEQRA coordination will be sent to us and other agencies, within the next week, and as a Type I Action would then be filed with the Department of Environraental Conservation according to state publication procedures}; b) you will be forwarding a copy of the most recent status update concerning the Town Trustees application, County Health Department, and N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation at the time of filing your Z.B.A. application; c) a copy of the receipt showing the date of filing with the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, of the SEQRA designation should be filed as soon as it becomes available -- this will confirm that the SEQRA procedures have been initiated and the public comment period has started; d) it is expected that the ZBA, the public, etc. would then be notified under the notice requirements (30-da¥ comment period)~ The ZBA would at that time be in a position to coordinate comments and concerns. e) Once SEQRA has been _finalized and a Declaration of Non-Significance or Significance issued, separate applications with th~ Z.B.A. should be filed for each parcel. As mentioned Page 2 - August 28, 1~. To: Mr. Henry E. Raynor, Jr. Re: Aliano, Krupski & Pond Enterprises, Inc. to,you, the parcels apear to be in single-and-separate ownership, and the owners do not intend to be merge them into joint ownership. Several application forms with instructions were previously forwarded; three Special Exception application forms must be signed by the property owner(s) for the appropriate parcel[s) under consideration: three parcels, known as CTM Lot 1 by Pond Enterprises, Inc.; CTM Lot 2 by Patricia Krupski; CTM Lot i7 by Nicholas Aliano - confirmed with copies of current deeds. f) once the above have been accomplished, it is expected that public hearings on the Z.B~A. applications will be advertised~ Please keep us advised regarding the status of this project. Very truly yours, CC: GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN By Linda Kowalski Planning Board Southold Town Trustees Suffolk County Department of Health Services N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation (Environmental Analysts) HENRY P. SMITH, Pzesident JOHN M. BREDEMEYER. Vice-P£es. PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD /kLBERT KRUPSKI, JR. ELLEN M. LARSEN BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 June 12, 1986 TELEPHONE (5161 765-1892 Mr. Nicholas Aliano c/o Aliano's Beachcomer Resort Motel & Restaurant 3800 Duck Pond Road Cutchogue, New York 11935 Dear Mr. Aliano: Pursuant to your request for a determination on the need of a Wetland Permit for work on your property, please be advised that the Bay Constable has conducted an on site inspection and has determined that this is a maintenance project, and no permit is required for the removal of the seaweed on the beach. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. We look forward no serving you in the future. HPS:ip Attachment (1) cc: Trustees file Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees Ilene Pfifferling Clerk to Board A FIELD R'E~.ORT -- POLICE DEPT.. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. N.Y. Ce~t~ Co~ap[aint N~. ~ Ha~ of O~. Sector Inci~t Or Crime Grid No. ~}me~t ~"~" ~ EO~ our QC ~r~d By Arrest PDT$ 2 ~ Continuatio~ Rel~ort Attached? [~ Yes RePorting~ Officer~o~ ~c ~/) i Shield.,~., ~ ,. [No. Supervisor Form PDTS 1 TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer. III. President Albert J. Krupski. Jr.. Vice President Henry P. Smith John B. Tuthill Will/am G. Albertson Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (51'6) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road EO. Box I179 Southold. New York 11971 ~Coa Office Use Only: DATE REC.: stal Erosion Permit Application ~etland Permit Application nl ~ ~ ~ ---Waiver from Chapter 97(Application/per~L%0: ---Trustee Lands Permit Appli ~ation j~. (Y/N) (Y/N) issued-date: Grandfather Permit~pl~gation ~/~]~ Completed Apps. Date. --Inspection date: -'CAC comments-Date: ' Variance Required: (Y/N) Neighbors notified-Date: SEQRAType Coord.: Date sent SEQRADetermin./date: Public He~ring/date: Findings: Approved Special Conditions: (see file) Permit(s) TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Appli~=Liu~ 2~: Application Number; SCTM~ 1000- q % ~k~-, Date: Applicant: ~ 6~,~ E~ ~al'fW4 ~/~6- Interest: (owner, consultant,lessee,etc.) D~~ ~ner of Property: ~c~o[q[ ¢ Subject Property Location: C c~'~U(Z~,c~x ~ ~ Phone (Provide LILCO Pole location map) Distance to cross Streets if not on THIS IS NOT A PEP~MIT Page 1 Yds. ~o be excavated: ~0_ ,Yds. to be filled: Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Width of c~al, creek or bay front~g prope=ty: Depth at Distance low tide: Aver. rise to nearest channel: I~ in tide: Distance project extends beyond similar projects in area: Area zoning: ~0~ Land area in acres: ~ ~ Is project for private or business use: Intended use of property: ~ Describe known prior operations conducted on premises: Has any prior license or permit been issued to erect structures, dredge, or deposit fill on said premises: ~0 Has any license or permit ever been revoked or suspended by a Governmental Agency: ~6 Project Description The project description must also include plans for reclamation of land disturbed during construction of the princlpie and accessory structures and underground structures (i.e., p~peline and septic system; make additional attachments i~ necessary). THIS IS NOT A PERMIT Page Authorization lWhere the applicant is not the owner) ~ I ~(~ ~{~ ~ residing at 3~ · ~&~ ' (Print-owner of subject property) (Mailing address-phone) do hereby authorize ~%l Coastal Erosion permit(s) to apply for from the Southold Town Trustees Signature THIS IS NOT A PERMIT Page · ' · ' / PROJECT I,D, NUMBER I · ~ 6'~21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I~PROJECT INFORMATION (To be corr aleted by Applicant or Project sconsor) 3. PROJECT LOCATION: 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: [] New [] ExDe~sion [~Modification/alteration l 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: SEQF 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED; lf~.~ Initially I~- acres UIHmate v acres 8. WILL FRCPOSED A TiON COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? [] Yes ~Nol If No, describe briefly WHAT IS PRESENT LAi'~D USE tN VICINITY OF PROJECT? [] Park/Forest/Oaen soace [] Other 10. DOES ACTION iNVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING. NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL. STATE OR LOCAL)? [] NO 1! ye~, lis~ age~.~y. (s) ~.ncl permluapprovals D S ANy ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A VAL D PERMIT OR APPROVAL9 ~yeE: I~,N0 , f yes, list ,g ency nameC~Un~R~Ee?mT~Yao~rOVal ' 12.AS A RESULT OFDFP~P. OPOSEC ACTION WILLEXISTtNGPERMITIAPPROVALREQUIREMOD~FICATION? 'No CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE If the action is in the Coastal Area. and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form bofore proceeding with th is assessment OVER 1 D. IS THERE. DR Is THERE LIKELY TO iaE. CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIA~ ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? [] Yes [] No If Yes. explain briefly PART III--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be con' ~Jeted by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effec! identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large. ~mportan! orothenvise significant. Each eHect should be assessed in connechon with its (a) setting (i.e. uroan or r,Jral); (b) prol~abjldy et occ~Jn.ing; {c) duration; (d) irrevers~bility; (e} geographic scope; and (t) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference suPPorting mater/als. Ensure that explanshons contain sulhctent detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have Dean identified and adequately auoressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more eotentially large or significant adverse impacts which .~Aoccur. Then proceed directly to me FULL EAF and/Dr prepare a positive declaration. J~ Check this POX if you have determined, based on the information and analysis aDOre and any supporting docurpentat~on, that the proposed action WILL NOT resUll in any sigm i/cant adverse environmental impacts AND prowde on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination; County of Suffolk ) State of New York ) BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRES THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER E~OWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTBOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS ~/qD FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AN~ CLAIMS ARISING UNDER 0~% BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TR~ISTEES, THEIR AGENT(s) OR REPRESENTATIVE(s), TO E~T~:R ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~/~ SI GNATURE SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS ~ DAY OF ~ NOTARY PUBLIC Suggested space for location Map THIS IS NOT A PERMIT TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III. President Albert J. KrupskL Jr.. Vice President Henry P. Smith John B. Tuthill William G. Albertson Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 I (we) BOARD OF TOV~N TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 30 year Maintenance Agreement Erosion Protection Structures Chapter 37 Southold Town Code Southold Trustees as AdminiStrator SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 type or print name(s) ~ ~ the ow~ne~ of ~ecord.~ property at: ~ ~00 ~>~c~ (type or print street address) SCTM ~1000- in applying for a Coastal Erosion permit for an Erosion Protection Structure do hereby agree to a 30 year maintenance program for a structure commonly known as a of as shown on the attached feet of length licensed survey of the as-built structure. It is my/our understanding that we are to maintain this structure with materials designed to endure 30 years and or equivalent to the original approved structure and that for any maintenance which involves more than 5% in length of this structure we are to give prior written notice to the administrator, waiting for their approval in all but true emergency situation's which would seriously endanger life, proper~y and important coastal natural resource features such as bluffs or wetlands. We further understand that failure to maintain the structure could result in a requirement to post a bond and or have the repairs ordered as a lien against the ~roper~y upon a finding by the Trustees that said lack of ainte~ance would risk life, property or important natural resources features including protected, rare or threatened animals and plants. Notarized Signature of owner of record SWORN TO BEFO~ ME THIS NOTARY PUBLIC Please submit three copies of a licensed land survey made within one year of the orzginal construction. This m~intenance agreement shall only be valid upon the final approval of the administrator. Subsequent owners may apply to the Southold Town Trustees to re-auEhorize this maintenance agreement. I£ you have any questions, or require additional infoz~mation, please contact this office. S re4v? / k~c~rd ~. Ward Chairman ac: Charles Hamilton, Departmental of Environmental Conservation Charles Voorhis, Charles Voorhis and Associates Stephen Ressler, Department of State ~!~]iam, Sharp,. Department of State ~t~t~l~ Town-T~uStees ~ ~t{omas Fisher, Senior BuJ/ding Inspector Glen D. Spe~ta, Glen Spetta Associates / / / / / / / / / .~ ..t / / /~ / / / : /:/, I / ,...:. / / / / ! Receipt Received For 4598 TOWN of $OUTHOL£ OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECT( Town Hall Southold, New York 1197~ ,~ I II