Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLandfill Site Inspection Report Draft 03/1991 Vol 1 i 02-9008-48-SI REV. NO. 0 FINAL DRAFT SITE INSPECTION REPORT SOUTHOLD LANDFILL 1 CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK VOLUME 1 OF 2 PREPARED UNDER TECHNICAL DIRECTIVE DOCUMENT NO. 02-9008-48 CONTRACT NO. 68-01-7346 FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY MARCH 29, 1991 NUS CORPORATION SUPERFUND DIVISION SUBMITTED BY: 1 G JO .GOLDEN,JR. V REVIEWED/APPROVED BY: PR MANAGER 4,47Z1-4-1- ILtrencte,., PAUL BAUERR• ALD M.NAMAN SITE MANAGER FIT OFFICE MANAGER 1 I 02-9008-48-SI Rev. No. 0 SITE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Southold Landfill is located on North Road in Cutchoque, Suffolk County, New York. The 57-acre property is situated on level ground in a rural area of Long Island (Ref. Nos. 7, p. 165; 41). The site is bounded to the north by farmlands and a small wooded area; to the east by farmland and a wooded area containing several commercial properties; to the south by several private residences and a commercial property; and to the west by farmland. The site consists of an active landfill, two former lagoons located in the northwest corner, a large sand pit in the northeast corner, a weigh station at the entrance, and a large metal building in the southeast corner used to receive and stage recyclable wastes(Ref. No. 17). Figures 1 and 2 provide a Site Location Map and a Site Map, respectively. The landfill, which is owned and operated by the Town of Southold, has been active since 1951 (Ref. No. 7, p. 1). The landfill, formerly an unlined borrow pit, covers approximately 35 acres of a 57-acre site. Waste is deposited in the landfill at a rate of approximately 40,000 tons per year(Ref. Nos. 17, p. 4). The waste has been deposited to a depth of approximately 40 feet below ground surface. Most of the site has been filled back up to natural grade (Ref. Nos. 11, 40). The site is still active and final cover has not yet been applied. The landfill currently has two active working faces, one for construction debris and one for household garbage. The landfill also has segregated areas for tires, metals, composting material, and grass. The tires and scrap metal are removed periodically by contracted recycling companies. Household hazardous wastes are received at the large metal building in the southeast corner of the property identified as the Southold Town Collection Center. The wastes are segregated and periodically manifested off site(Ref. No. 17,41). Wastes suspected of being deposited in the landfill include: oil soaked earth, waste oil, asphalt mix, hospital waste, pesticide containers,and septic sludge contaminated with organic solvents and metals(Ref. Nos. 3; 6; 7, pp. 119, 120; 9). The Town of Southold formerly operated two unlined septic lagoons in then northwest corner of the property. The date the lagoons began operation is unknown. The lagoons received septic tank and cesspool wastes until 1986. In 1987, the lagoons were drained and the liquid was mixed with shredded compost material on site. The sludge was dredged out and apparently deposited in the landfill (Ref. No. 14). Prior to 1979, an estimated 3,000 to 5,000 gallons of waste solvents generated by a nearby airbase were deposited in the lagoons (Ref. No. 2). Analyses of samples collected from the lagoon while they were still active confirmed the presence of organic solvents(Ref. No. 13). Groundwater sampling has been conducted periodically at the site by consulting firms retained by the Town of Southold and the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). Analyses of the samples collected from monitoring wells on site have indicated presence of numerous inorganic and organic contaminants in groundwater downgradient of the site(Ref. Nos. 4; 7, pp. 111, 112, 115-118; 15). I 02-9008-48-SI -7- . . -Re‘c; No --Q Duck Pond �" Pont J�1 ..r 6r / •. • •` \- ' \ ss ap 1 \ f 37 P1 • ,1. '— 1 s \ SOUTHOLD LF °.‹ ti ! f _ , r._--...._,../.....'• -4 b .- ....e+ j .. II, . oPOI•' .'''• t^e i•'...4.. 7-37- o - \� Q• .� Off, p. :.,.. �, J <�, ° 1 . w. J -� •. • tr • �‘ C L-2 . ,- 47 u. Cµta)ogue Sta .'-,.S . 30 , i_ ' �•• _' UOEy�j y �� �� • �1 . v '1 I f 10 r . 5"'•� •• i� Sacred J�eart ' 24 1 �� .o . \•,) yr,- %... , 4) . '-0)0 7 \ • • / " ' • .•f• \ •\ i I .Cil - t3 r� / • . . .•,,,f, . o \ \`� :Vs. :dutch \ • :,/ `,. `\ ctirie_. +wit ( 4 o , • Old +♦ 1...o \f. ', • t•': 7�'t 1 +� BIM 32 .0.111 • • ', - / o� iar \ 44,..t.. J\ ,`,ji • % Cutcbows ,•; ( .• p� \ :'h 'r�' r. ', '‘---1. � .J is " • f i - •• d"� -.'.:!.1?--�) I �~ �\ \ai• N Forft S) ..Y4 ,r te `^� NEW YORK a �' a\\ / • ` l I ?: `^ •• 111 • \+ 25 p '�0 • ( 'P ,:,_.;%•... ,l'•-•• \(l JtI� p� �� • \ •���f • (WAD) MATTITUCK NIU.'. N.Y. 1 SITE LOCATION MAP FIOWA E 1 E ,\ SOUTHOLD LF, CUTCHOGUE, N.Y. N I 'CALL 1 200W CCSPORACTION 11. 02-9008-48-SI Rev. No. 0 c _at 1 X . A X X X X X•a. :o �x Xx FENCE ____...4______\i ••' •" "'TGARBAGEt 147...:Al PER !• :o`.:o: ,• p�,• -°.•.. ff.;. ... :•.•o ' I u �. ST• AGING ':'•o•.,•'• ! :• °•�:•.';•. ;; ::;..•..' �r =/ I AREA z-\\ WOODED X ••o••••••,:e• -• ego ••. ' • .INS 1C ••, ••,:o'' SANDPIT. ''•°'''•., o�:•: " CONSTRUCTION qg __ !HOUSEHOLD• •• ?'•• •':o•••a' ° .. DEBRIS // //' r"• '�' Io:%•:...•;o .•o:• •,•,• � it ,_' _u x • - •�.,•: ; o•••o; ...•'. a.••..- - r#% IWASTEDOUS a • '••o'•i•.o•O .a_(�o !1 q 4N N AREA v N0..•, Z ❑ X l(-- •a;°••••,'o• •'::. J WASTE \';.°• =,1°: 0 1.1 I COLLECTION \•:.o •,•,o•• it CENTER O 1 WOODED •%.o•:• •• •- X I WEIGH k" \IIIIIIIP 1•-•• STATION . .'? s% Rev. No. 0 I SITE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS (CONT'D) I On December 12, 1978, the SCDHS requested that the New York State Department of Environmental 1 Conservation (NYSDEC) take legal action against the Town of Southold due to persistent violations of Part 360 of Title 6, New York Codes, Rules and Regulations. An Order of Consent was issued by the NYSDEC on January 10, 1979. The conditions of the Consent Order are unknown. On August 31, 1981 the landfill was classified as an open dump because it was found to be in noncompliance on safety (explosive gases beyond the property boundary). The landfill was also found to be in violation of New York State groundwater standards (Ref. No. 7, p. 53). A Phase I Investigation Report was submitted to NYSDEC in December 1985. A Phase II investigation is currently in progress which reportedly will include the installation of additional monitoring wells. The Town's permit to operate the landfill has expired. The landfill was required by state law to close on December 18, 1990; however, the town is currently in litigation and has been granted a stay by the court until the litigation is resolved(Ref. Nos. 17,p.4;41). �t The landfill has been inspected several times during its operation by the SCDHS and the NYSDEC. The inspection reports indicate recurrent violations, primarly failure to provide adequate daily cover. Other violations cited include: uncontrolled rodent and insect infestation, unapproved wastes deposited on site, site open without attendant, leachate ponding on site, uncontrolled dumping, working face higher than 10 feet, papers uncontrolled or blowing off site, methane gas leaving the site, refuse not sufficiently compacted, and improper salvaging(Ref. Nos. 1, 2, 5, 6,9, 10). On December 4-5, 1990, NUS Corporation Region 2 FIT personnel performed a site inspection of the Southold Landfill. During the inspection five groundwater and three soil samples were collected off site, and three groundwater and six soil samples were collected on site. Analyses of the samples indicate that a release of contaminants from the site to groundwater has occurred. Chlorobenzene was detected in downgradient monitoring wells on site. Background information indicates that waste solvents containing benzene products were disposed of in unlined lagoons on site. The contaminant was not detected in upgradient wells. Elevated concentrations of inorganics including aluminum, calcium, iron, lead, magnesium, manganese, potassium, and sodium were detected in samples collected from a downgradient monitoring well on site. The contaminant 1,2- dichloropropane was also detected in samples collected from a downgradient monitoring well on site and in a tapwater sample collected from private residence downgradient of the site. Analyses of soil samples indicate the presence of contaminated soils on site. The contaminants include: barium, copper, lead,silver, zinc, and 4-chloraniline(Ref. No. 19). I 1 1 vv JvvV�N-moi Rev. No. 0 I SITE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS (CONT'D) A recommendation LOW PRIORITY FOR FURTHER ACTION under CERCLA/SARA is given for the Southold Landfill Site. This recommendation is based on the potential for contamination of domestic supply wells in the area and the potential for nearby residents be exposed to hazardous substances through air releases(methane)and direct contact with contaminated soils. Approximately 69 people are served by groundwater within a 0.25-mile radius of the site and two well head protection areas are located within 4 miles of the site. Approximately 19 people reside within 200 feet of the site property and nine people work on the property full time. There is little or no potential for surface water contamination since there is no apparent migration route from the site to surface water. I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I Rev No. 0 ISITE ASSESSMENT REPORT: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT PART I: SITE INFORMATION I1. Site Name/Alias Southold Landfill IStreet North Road City Cutchooue State New York Zip 11935 1 2. County Suffolk County Code 103 Cong.Dist. 1 3 EPA ID No. NYD980762603 1 4. Block No. Section 96, Block 1 Lot No. 17.3 I5. Latitude 41°01'40" Longitude 72°30' 00" W USGS Quad. Mattituck Hills, New York 1 6. Owner Town of Southold Tel.No.(516)765-1800 Street Main Road ICity Southold State New York Zip 11971 I7. Operator Town of Southold Tel.No. (516) 765-1800 Street Main Road ICity Southold State New York Zip 11971 8. Type of Ownership I ❑Private 0 Federal 0 State ❑County x❑Municipal ❑Unknown ❑Other I9. Owner/Operator Notification on File 0 RCRA 3001 Date 0 CERCLA 103c Date 1 0 None [z] Unknown I10. Permit Information Permit Permit No. Date Issued Expiration Date Comments IPart 360 Unknown Unknown April 22, 1985 SPDES NY-0103446 Unknown Unknown ISolid Waste 52-5-17 Unknown Unknown Manaqement 1 11. Site Status ❑x Active ❑Inactive 0 Unknown 1 12. Years of Operation 1951 to Present I Rev. No. 0 I 13. Identify the types of waste sources (e.g., landfill, surface impoundment, piles, stained soil, above- or below-ground tanks or containers, land treatment, etc.) on site. Initiate as many waste unit numbers as needed to identify all waste sources on site. (a) Waste Sources Waste Unit No. Waste Source Type Facility Name for Unit 1 Landfill Landfill 2 Surface impoundment Former Septic Sludge Lagoons (b) Other Areas of Concern Identify any miscellaneous spills, dumping, etc. on site; describe the materials and identify their locations on site. None I 14. Information available from Contact Amv Brochu Agency U.S. EPA Tel.No. (201)906-6802 Preparer Paul Bauer Agency NUS Corp. Reoion 2 FIT Date 3/29/91 I I I I I I i 1 I I I Rev No. 0 PART II: WASTE SOURCE INFORMATION I For each of the waste units identified in Part I,complete the following items. Waste Unit 1 - Landfill Source Type X Landfill Contaminated Soil Surface Impoundment Pile Drums Land Treatment Tanks/Containers Other Description: The landfill covers approximately 35 acres of a 57-acre site. The wastes have been deposited in a unlined former borrow pit to a depth of approximately 40 feet below ground surface. Most of the site has been filled back up to natural grade. The site is still active and final cover has not yet been applied. The landfill currently has two active working faces,one for construction debris and the other for household garbage. The landfill also has segregated staging areas for tires, metals, composting material, and grass. The tires and metal are periodically removed by contracted recycling companies. The property is enclosed by a fence. 111 Hazardous Waste Quantity The quantity of waste is unknown. In 1987 the landfill was estimated to cover approximately 35 acres. Waste has been deposited to depth of approximately 40 feet. The landfill currently accepts approximately 40,000 tons of waste per year, approximately one-third of which is household garbage. I Hazardous Substances/Physical State Wastes deposited in the landfill include construction debris, municipal and household waste, tires, junk metal, and cars. Sludge dredged from two former septic lagoons on site may have been deposited in the landfill. The sludge was contaminated with waste solvents which were deposited in the lagoons. Analyses of grab samples collected from the lagoons in December 1984 and March 1985 indicate the presence of tetrachloroethylene, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, phenols, chloroform,and 1,1,1-trichloroethane. - During a site inspection conducted by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) on August 23, 1983, "many" containers of pesticides (Manax, Theodain,Vydate L)were observed in three locations on site. - On November 10, 1980, the landfill accepted at least two truckloads of oil soaked earth generated by a spill at a tankfarm in Flanders, New York. Analyses of groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells on site downgradient of the landfill indicate the presence of I PCBs in groundwater. Drums of waste oil,hospital waste,and asphalt mix varying in viscosity from near solid to liquid may also have been accepted at the landfill. Ref. No. 3; 6; 7,pp. 1 1 1, 112, 1 19� 120, 137; 9; 11, 141 Sy 16 1 7 8 I Rev. No. 0 I PART II: WASTE SOURCE INFORMATION I For each of the waste units identified in Part I,complete the following items. Waste Unit 2 - Former Septic Lagoons Source Type Landfill Contaminated Soil X Surface Impoundment Pile Drums Land Treatment Tanks/Containers Other Description: Two former unlined septic lagoons were operated on site in the northwest corner of the property. The site has operated since 1951; however, it is not known when the lagoons began operation. The lagoons received waste until 1986. Apparently, the lagoons were drained in 1987 and the liquid mixed with shredded compost material on site. The lagoons were dredged and the sludge may have been deposited in the landfill. Hazardous Waste Quantity The lagoons were irregularly shaped and measured roughly 125 to 175 feet wide, 150 to 200 feet long, and 25 feet deep. The actual capacity of the lagoons or total amount of waste deposited into the lagoons is unknown; however, approximately 3,000 to 5,000 gallons of waste solvents and solvent sludges were deposited in the lagoons prior to 1979 at a rate of approximately 300 gallons per year. Hazardous Substances/Physical State The lagoons accepted septic tank and cesspool wastes. The solvent wastes that were deposited in the lagoons were generated by the Mattituck Airbase. Analyses of samples collected from the lagoons in December 1984 and June 1985 indicate the presence of tetrachloroethylene, benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene,xylenes,phenols,chloroform,and 1,1,1-trichloroethane. I 1 I I Ref. Nos. 2; 8; 10; 17, p. 1 1,21 I S Jvvv-vU'J. Rev. No. 0 PART III: SAMPLE RESULTS I EXISTING ANALYTICAL DATA In August and September 1980, the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) collected groundwater samples from the three monitoring wells on site. The upgradient well located on the southern edge of the property is identified as No. 5-69761. This well is 100 feet deep. The downgradient wells located on the northern edge of the property are identified as well Nos. 5-68916 and 5-68831, and are 102 feet and 200 feet deep, respectively. A summary of the analytical results ' are presented by the H2M Corp. in reference No. 4 of this report. The complete data was apparently not available. Also, no information is provided concerning sampling protocol, quality assurance, methods of analysis or the laboratory that performed the analysis. The analytical data presented indicates the presence of arsenic (20.0 mg/L), selenium (40.0 mg/L), and manganese (>15.3 mg/L) in the sample collected from the downgradient well No.S-68916. On December 22, 1980, H2M Corp. collected groundwater samples from the three monitoring wells on site. A summary of the analytical data is presented in the table in Ref. No. 4. The analytical data indicate the presence of phenols (4.00 mg/L) in the sample collected from well No S-68831 and the presence of phenols (2.00 mg/L), manganese (25.2 mg/L), selenium (14.0 mg/L), and 1,1,2 trichlorotrifluoroethane (160 mg/L) in the sample collected from well No S-68916. Additionally, elevated levels of sulfate, ammonia,total dissolved solids, and specific conductivity were noted in the sample from well No. S-68916 as compared to the sample collected from the upgradient well No. 5- 69761.( Ref. No.4) The Energy Resource Co. Inc. submitted to the NYSDEC the analytical results for groundwater samples from solid waste facilities on Long Island in a letter dated August 13, 1981. The samples had been treceived for analysis on July 15, 1981. No information is provided concerning the sample collection. One of the samples was collected from monitoring well No. S-68916 at the Southold Landfill. The sample was analyzed for selected pesticides, herbicides, trace metals, "wet chemistry" parameters, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). PCB 1260 was detected at 0.4 ppb. (Ref. No. 7 pp. 111, 112, 115-118). On July 27, 1981, a methane migration survey was conducted by the SCDHS. The survey confirmed that "high concentrations" of methane existed beyond site boundaries on the west and north sides of the site. Vegetative stress(browning of potato plant foilage)was noted approximately 100 feet from site boundaries( Ref. No. 7 pp 113, 114). I I Rev. No. 0 I The H2M Corp. collected 5 grab samples from the septic waste lagoons on the Southold landfill. The samples were collected on December 21, 1984; March 12,June 13, October 2, and December 30, 1985. The samples were analyzed by H2M Corp. for selected volatile compounds and phenols. Analyses of the samples indicated the presence of the following compounds: sample collected December 21, 1984,tetrachloroethane(2 ug/L), benzene(3 ug/L),toluene (22 ug/L), ethylbenzene (1 ug/L), m-xylene (1 ug/L), p-xylene/o-xylene (1 ug/L), and phenols(23.0 ug/L); sample collected March 12, 1985, phenol (10 ug/L); sample collected June 13, 1985, chloroform (44 ug/L), 1,1,1-trichloroethane (15 ug/L), toluene (4ug/L); sample collected October 2, 1985, phenol (6 ug/L); sample collected December 30, 1985,toluene(26 ug/L),and phenol (30 ug/L)(Ref. No. 13). The SCDHS collected groundwater samples from well Nos. S-68916 and 5-68831 (downgradient wells) on March 30, 1987, and well No 5-69761 (upgradient well) on April 1, 1987. The samples were analyzed by the Suffolk County Health Services Laboratory. Analysis of the sample collected from well No. 5-68916 indicates elevated levels of the following inorganic substances; magnesium (45 mg/L), calcium (150 mg/L), sodium (190 mg/L), potassium (190 mg/L) and manganese (3.4 mg/L) as compared to samples collected from well Nos. 5-68831 and S-69761. Analysis of the three samples for organic contaminants indicates the presense of 1, 2,-dichloroethane(2 ug/L) and 1;2-dichloropropane (3 ug/L) in the sample from well No. S-68916 and benzene (1 ug/L), toluene (3 ug/L), total xylenes (5 ug/L) and 1, 2, 4 trimethylbenzene (3 ug/L) in the sample from well No. 5-69761_ No organic contaminants were detected in the sample from well No.5-68831 (Ref. No. 15). SITE INSPECTION RESULTS 1 NUS Corporation Region 2 FIT performed a sampling site inspection at the Southold landfill located in Cutchoque, New York. A total of 17 environmental samples were collected and included 8 aqueous samples, and 9 soil samples. Table 1 presents a summary of the analytical data. Sample locations are shown in Figures 3 and 4. Samples were analyzed under the Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) for Target Compound List (TCL) contaminants, excluding cyanide. A complete presentation of the analytical results can be found in Reference No. 19. Groundwater samples were collected to determine whether a release of contaminants to groundwater attributable to the facility has occurred. Soil samples were collected to determine whether a potential exists for direct contact with contaminants in the soil that are attributable to the facility. In addition, soil samples results will assess the potential for groundwater contamination. I 1 - SS — NI r — 1 111111 I r i 1 la ea Ea as — a 11/010l SITE NAME: SOUTHOLD LANDFILL TABLE I IPPB: c2-91M8-48 SITE INSPECTION SAMPLE RESULTS SAMPLING DATES: 12/4/90-12/5/90 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL EPA CASE NO.: 15486 LAB: INIECH 8101AB5 CUTCHOQUE, NEW YORK VOLATILES Sample ID No. NYNN-GW1 NYNH-GWS NYNH-GWs NYNH-G117 NYNH-G08 NYNH-I8LX1 NYNH-6W2(MS/MSD) NYNH-G01 NYNH-GW4(DUP) NYNH-SI NYNH-S2IDUP) Traffic Report No. BFC39 8FC54 BFC55 81C98 BFC99 BFFI9 BFC40 BFC41 BFC53 BFF66 BFF61 Matrix WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER SOIL SOIL Units ; ug/L ua/t ug/L ug/L ugh ug/t ugh ug/l ugh ug/kg ug/kg Dilution Factor 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 Percent Moisture ' -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5 5 Chloromethane ; 19 Bromomethane Vinyl Chloride Chloroethane Methylene Chloride B Acetone J J Carbon Disulfide 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,1-Dichloroethane Trans-I,2-Dichloroethene (total) Chloroform 1,2-Dichloroethane J J 2-Butanone 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Carbon Tetrachloride Vinyl Acetate Bromodichloromethane l,2-Dichloropropane 9 15 15 cis-1,1-Dichloropropene Trichloroethene DibrsmochloromeIbane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Benzene trans-I,3-Dichloropropene Bromoform I 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 2-Mexanone Tetrachloroethene 3 Toluene 3 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Chlorobenzene 24 23 • Ethylbenzene I Styrene Xylenes (Total) NOTES: 7 Blank space - compound analyzed for but ri) N < 1 not detected • VD B - compound found in lab blank as well as C) z"D sample, indicates possible/probable O DO blank contamination • 1 P. E - estimated value O 00 J estimated value, compound present below ,ROI but above IDE ;f; P - analysis did not pas, EPA 0n/OC N - Presumptive evidence of the prdecce of the material NA - analysis not ,eouired 1111 11111 NM Ink INS NIS 11111i 11M1 11111 Nil 111111 11111 1111 NM 11111 NIB MIS In Nil 1 .. ell'1 5111 MANE: SOUTHOLD LANDFILL TABLE I (CONT'D) IODI: 02-9008-48 SITE INSPECTION SAMPLE RESULTS SAMPLING DATES: 12/4/90.12/5/90 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL EPA CASE NO.: 15186 LAB: INIECH BIOLABS CUTCHOQUE, NEM YORK VOLAIILES Sample ID No. NYNH-S3 MINN-SI NrHH-S5 NYNH-S6 HYNH-SI NYNH-S81MS/F'SD) NYNO-SO NYNH-XIHI MONO-R1M2 NYNH-81113 NYNN-R1N4 MIHH-IAIR2 Traffic Report No. 11E68 IF169 8Ff10 81111 81112 11113 81111 BFF75 81176 BF111 $1118 81180 Matrix SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL MAZER MAIEA MAZER MATER MATER 1 Units ug/kg ug/kg ug/11 ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/k9 ugh ugll ug/L ugh ugh Dilution Factor t I I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 Percent Moisture 2 15 5 36 2 9 10 - -- -- -- Chloromethane J 1 1 25 15 Oromcmethare Vinyl Chloride Chloroethane Methylene Chloride B 8 8 8 B Acetone J 23 30 46 J 1 Carbon Disulfide 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,1-Dichloroethane Irans-1,2-Oichloroethene (total) ; Chloroform I,2-Dichlorcethane 2-Butanone 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Carbon Tetrachloride Vinyl Acetate 8romodichloromethane 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene � Trichloroethene Dibromochloromethane 1,1,2-Orichloroethane Benzene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Bromoform j 4-Nethyl-2-Pentanone 2-Hexanone letrachloroethene loluene 1 7 3 1,l,2.2-tetrachloroethane Chlcrobenzene . Ethylbenzene Styrene Xylenes (Total) NOTES: Blank space - compound analyzed hr but JJ O not deter ted rD POe r B - compound found in lab blank as well as • ip sample, indicates possible probable O blank contamination Co 0 OD E - estimated value • J - estimated value, compound present -P• O Cb below CA01 but above IDL r A analysis did not pass EPA 0A/OC 'Jr N Presumptive evidence of the resence P G D of the material NR - analysis not rearmed Detection limits elevated if Dilution factor I aniror percent moisture '0% NIB e — — M M all M all N 8 NO M an N — M OM N 04 91,71 SITE NAM: SOUTNOLD LANDFILL TABLE 1 (CONT'D) um: 02-90011-18 SITE INSPECTION SAMPLE RESULTS SANPIiNG DATES: 12/1/90-12/5/90 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL EPA CASE NO.: 15186 LAB: MUCH BIOLABS CUTCHOQUE, NEW YORK SEMI-VOLAIILES Sante ID No. HYMN-GNI NYNH-G115 HtNH-CM6 NYNH-GM7 NYNM-6M8 NYNN-181N1 NYNH-GN2(NS/MSD) N401-GM3 NYNM-GM4(DUP) MYNN-SI MYNN-S200) Traffic Report No. BFC39 BFC54 8FC55 BfC98 BFC99 B1F79 6FC40 BFC11 BFC53 BFF66 BFF67 Matrix MATER MATER MAID MATER MAIER MAIER MATER MAIER MAIER SOIL SOIL Units ugh ugh ug/t ug/l ug/L ug/L ug/t ug/t ugh ug/kg ug/kg Dilution Factor/GPC Cleanup (Y) 1 I I I I N/A I I I 4 4 Percent Moisture -- -- -- -- N/A -- -- 5 5 Phenol MR bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether NR 2-Chlororhenol NA 1,3-Dichlorobenzene RA 1,1-Dichlorobenzene NA 3 3 Benzyl alcohol NA l,2-Dichlorobenzene NA 2-Nelhylphenol RR bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether NR 4-Nethylphenol NA N-Mitroso-di-n-dipropylaaine MA Neaachloroethane NA Nitrobenzene NR Isophorone NA 2-Nitrophenol MR 2,4-Dimethylphenol RA Benzoic acid NR bis(2-Chloroethouy)aethane RR 2,1-Dichlorophenol MR l,2,4-Trichlorobenzene RA Naphthalene MR 4-Chloroaniline MR Mexachlorobutadiene MA 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol NA 2-Methylnaphthalene MA Nexachlorocyclopentadiene NA 2,1,6-Trichlorophenol NR 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol AR 2-Chloronaphthalene MA 2-Mitroaniline NA Dieethylphthalate MA Acenaphthylene MR 2,6.Dinitrotoluene NR 3-Mitroaniline NA Acenaphthene MR TT) TV O 2,4-Dinitrophenol NR < Y 4-Mitrophenol NA Co Dibenzofuran MR z Co 2,1-Dinitrotoluene MR Co io Dielhylphthalate MA A 4-ChlorophenYl-phenyl ether MR co Co r fluorene NP Li) 4-Nitroaniline MIR 4,6-Dinitro-2-sethylphenol NP N-nitrosodipheoylasire NA 4-8roaophenyl-phenyl ether MR Hexzchlorobenzene , NR INS 11111 NIB 1111111 0111 11111 AS 1111111 NM all In MI NMI 111111 In 111111 043,01 SIIE NAME: SOUIHO[D LANDFILL TABLE I (CONT'D) IDDM: 02-9008-I8 SITE INSPECTION SAMPLE RESULTS SAMPLING DATES: 1211/90-12/5/90 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL EPA CASE NO.: 15486 LAB: INTRO 8IOLABS CUTCHOQUE, NEW YORK SEMI-VOLATILES Sample ID No. NIMH-GM! NYNN'GMS NYNH-GMo NYNN-GMT NYNH-G118 NYNH-TBLKI NYNH-012(NS/MSD) NYNN-GA. NYNM-GMIIDUP) NINA-SI MVP-52(DUP) traffic Nepert No. 1FC39 IFC54 8FC55 BFC98 1FC99 BfFl9 BFC4O BFCII BFCSJ 1FF66 8FF6) Matrix ; MAIER WATER MAZER WATER MAZER MAZER WATER NATER NAIEA SOIL SOIL Units ; ug/L ug/L cg/i ug/L ugit ug/l ug/l ug/L u9/1. ug/kg ug/kg Dilution Factor/GPC Cleanup (Y) ; 1 I 1 1 I N/A 1 I I 1 4 Percent Moisture N/A - - 5 5 • Pentachlorophencl ; NR Phenanthrene NR Anthracene OR Di-n-butylphthalate NA Fluoranthene NR Pyrene NR Butylbentylphthalate NA J,3'-Dichlorobentidine NA lento(a)anthracene NO Chrysene NA bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 7 ] ] ] J NA Di-n-octylphthalate ; NA lento(b)fluoranthene NA Bento(k)fluoranthene NR lento(a)pyrene NR Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene NR Dibent(a,4)anthracene NA Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ; NA NOTES: Blank space - compound analyzed for but not detected 8 - compound found in lab blank as well as sample, indicates possible/probable blank contamination E - estimated value J - estimated value, compound present below COOL but above IDL A - analysis did not pass EPA 0A/OC N - Presumptive evidence of the presence of the material MR - analysis not required Detection limits elevated if Dilution c Factor >1 and/or percent moisture >O% rD n < r • u C C O Q -c CD 0 NM ■r r M r r — Nr all M MB i — N — i it all sir ^4'01/91 Slit NAME: $0018010 LANDFILL TABLE 1 (CONT'D) TDDI: 02-9008-18 SITE INSPECTION SAMPLE RESULTS SAMPLING DATES: 12/4/90-12/5/90 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL EPA CASE NO.: 15486 IAB: INTECH BIOLABS CUTCHOQUE. NEW YORK SEMI-VOLATILES Sample ID No. NYNH-S3 1191H-S4 H'NH-S5 NYNH-S6 NYNO-S1 N1NH-S8(M3/MSD) NYNH-Si NYNH 9101 N4NN-AIN2 NYNH-AINS 0100.0104 NYNH IBll2 Traffic Report No 1FF68 efF69 BFCJO 81111 8FF12 8FF13 BFF'4 BFF15 BFF16 BF117 BEM BFF80 Matrix SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL MAIER MA1EA MA1EA MATER MAIER Units ug/kg uglyg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ugil ugll ug/t ugh. ug/I Dilution Factor/SPC Cleanup (Y) 4 1 I 4 4 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 Percent Moisture 2 15 It 2 9 Ir' — — -- -' N/A Phenol NA bis(2-Chloroethyl(ether NA 2-Chlorophenol NA 1,3-Dichlorobenzene NA l,4-Dichlorobentene NA Benzyl alcohol NA l,2-Dichlorobenzene NE 2-Methylphenol NA bis(2-Chloroisopropyl(ether NA 4-Methylphenol NA N-Nitroso-di-n-dipropylaeine NR Nexachloroethane NA Nitrobenzene NA Isophorone NA 2-Hit'ophenol NA 2,4-Dimethylphenol NA Benzoic acid NA bis(2-Chloroethoxy)sethane ; NA 2,4-Dichlorcphenol ; MR I,2,4-Irichlorobenzene NA Naphthalene NA 4-Chloroaniline 10000 3 MR Mexachlorobutadiene NA 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol NA 2-Methylnaphthalene NA Nexachlorocyclopentadiene NA 2,1,6-lrichloropnenol NA 2,4,5-trichlorophenol NA 2-Chloronaphthalene NA 2-Nitroaniline OR Dieethylphthalate NA Acenaphthylene NA 2,6-Dinitrotoluene MA 3-Nitroaniline NA 70 0 Acenaphthene NA CD r-i 2,4-Dinitrophenol NA < 1 VO 4-11itraphenol NA CD O Dibeezofuran MA O Co 2,4-Dinitrotaluene NA • 1 Diethylphthalate 411 O 4. 4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl etherIIA 1 Fluorene NF 4-Nitroaniline NA 4,6-Oinitra-2-eethylphenol NA N-nitrosodiphenylamine HR 4 Broeophenyl-phenyl ether 40 hp 1 1 a - - EN MS i E M - i - - 1 - - /I MI 04,01,;! SITE NAME: 500140LD LANDFILL TABLE 1 (CONT'D) TDDI: 02-9008-48 SITE INSPECTION SANPLE RESULTS SAMPLING DATES: 12/4/90-12/5/90 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL EPA CASE NO.: 15486 LAB: INTICH 610LABS CUTCHOQUE, NEW YORK SEMI-VOLATILES Sample ID No. NYNN-S3 NYNN SI NINH SS N1SH-:t Orin rnuI-E3(MS/16D/ NINN-S' NtdN-RINI MINN-FIn2 Ntlh kit.L NINH-RIN4 0110-I61.0 Traffic Report No. 8FF68 BFF69 B1F70 8FF11 8F1:2 BFF13 BFFI4 BFF75 01116 6F1'? 81118 81480 Matrix ; SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL MA1ER MAIER MATER MATER MATER Units ug/Lg ug/Lg ug/kg ug/kg ugly ug/kg ugiIg ugh ug'L Lg/l ug/1 Lg/L Dilution Factor/GPC Cleanup IN) 4 I 1 4 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 Percent Moisture 15 5 36 2 5 10 -- -- -- N/A Pentachlorophenol NA Phenantbrene 1 NR Anthracene NA Di-n-butylphthalate 3 NR Fluoranthene 1 HR Pyrene 3 3 NA Butylbenzylphthalate 1 NA 3,3'-Dichlnrobenzidine ; NA lenzo(a)anthracene 3 NA Chrysene 3 1 NR bis(2-Ethylheayl)phthalate ] 110 230 53 NA Di-n-octylphthalate NA lenzolb)fluoranthene ] NR lenzo(k)fluorantiene 3 NR Benzo(a)pyrene 3 3 NA indend(1,2,3 cd)pyrene NR Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ; HR Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ; NR NOTES: Slack space - compound analyzed for but not detected B - compound found in lab blank as well as sample, indicates possible/Probable blank contamination E - estimated value ] - estimated value, compound present below CROI but above IOL 1 A - analysis did not pass EPA OA/OC N - Presumptive evidence of the presence of the material NA - analysis not required Detection limits elevated it Dilution factor >1 and/or percent moisture >0t 73C, CD NI < r • tc C C o a CX v — NS — S r — all NS 1 1 - - S GM UM — — — Nr ^-lie//?1 SITE NAME: SOUTHOLD LANDFILL TABLE 1 (COMM) TDDB: 02-9008-111 SITE INSPECTION SAMPLE RESULTS SAMPLING DALES: 12/4/90.12/5/90 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL EPA CASE NO.: 15486 LAB: MUCH BIOLABS CUTCHOQUE, NEW YORK PESIICIDES Sample ID No. NYNH-6M1 NYMN-GWS hiNN-;MY NYNd-G111 NYNN-GME NINH-IBLA1 NYN11-021MS/MSD1 NIMH GMJ NYNN GMIIDUP) NYNN-S1 NYNN S2(DUP) Traffic Report No IFC39 BFC54 BFC55 11FC98 BFC99 BFF19 BFC10 BFC41 BFC53 01F66 BFF67 Matrix MAZER MAIER MAIER MAIER MATER MAIER MAIER MAIER MATER SOIL Slit Units ug/L ug/l u711 ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ugl ug/l ug/kg ug!lg Dilution Factor/GPC Cleanup (0) 1 1 1 1 1 N/A 1 1 1 1 1 Percent Moisture -- -- -- -- -- N/A -- - -- 5 S alpha-BHC MR beta-BNC NR delta-BNC NA gamma-INC (Lindane) NR Heptachlor NR 1 Aldrin ; NR Heptachlor epoxide ; MR Endosulfan I Na Dieldrin MR 4,4'-DDE NP 93 E 120 Endrin NA J Endosulfan II MA 4,4 -DDO AR Endosulfan sulfate NR 57 4,4'-DDT MR 410 E 450 Methoxychlor NR Endrin ketone ; NI alpha-Chlordane ; NA game-Chlordane MR l 7 Toxaphene MR Aroclor•1016 MR Aroclor-1221 MR Aroclor•1232 MR Aroclor-1242 NI Aroclor-124$ NR Aroclor-1254 ; NR Aroclor-1210 MR NOTES: Blank space • compound analyzed for but not detected B - compound found in lab blank as well as sample, indicates possible/probable blank contamination m Q E - estimated value < Y J - estimated value, compound present CD below CROI but above IDL z o A - analysis did not pass EPA DA/OC o Co • N • Presumptive evidence of the lresence r A of the material o Co NA - analysis not required I N Detection limits elevated if Dilution ,A factor ,1 and/or iercent moisture 0% - I r r r r- IN NM - - 1 1 MI 1 it - r - - I 04/01;91 SIIE NAME: SOUTHOLD LANDFILL TABLE 1 (CONT'D) TOOK: 02.9008-48 SITE INSPECTION SAMPLE RESULTS SAMPLING DATES: 12/4/90-12/S/90 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL EPA CASE NO.: 15486 LAB: INIECH 810108S CUTCHOQUE. NEW YORK PESTICIDES Sample ID No. NYNN-S3 NYNH-SI HrNN-S5 NYNH-S6 RYAN-ST NIMH-S8(MS/11SD) NYN4-30 NYNH-R1(11 NINH-RIN2 NIN11-RIN3 NINH-RIN4 NYNN-18162 7 7 Traffic Report No. BFF68 81169 B1110 BFF,I AFF12 BFF13 8FF / BFF..�c BFF76 IFF17 BFFIB BFF80 Matrix SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL MAZER WRIER MAIER NA1EA MATER Units ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ug/kg ugh ugit u9/L ug/t ugrl Dilution Factor/GPC Cleanup (Y) I 1 I 10 I I 1 1 1 1 I I Percent Moisture 2 15 5 36 2 9 10 - -- - - N/A alpha-SOC NR beta-BNC NR delta-BNC NR gasaa-BHC (Lindane) J NA Heptachlor MR 11 Aldrin II NH Heptachlor epoxide MR Endosulfan I NA Dieldrin NA 4,4'-UDI J J 3 26 3 NA Endrin NR Endosulfan 11 ; 7 J NA 4,4'-DOD ' HR Endosullan sulfate J J NR l 4,4'-DOT Il E 16 E 32 NA Methoxychlor MR Endrin ketose ND alpha-Chlordane NR gaaa-Chlordane ; 3 3 J J NR loaaphene PR Aroclor-1016 MR Aroclor-1221 NA Aroclor-1232 NA Aroclor-1242 NR Aroclor-l248 NR Aroclor-1254 ; NA Aroclor-1260 NR NOTES: Blank space - compcund analyzed for but not detected 8 - compound found in lab blank as yell as sample, indicates possible/probable blank contamination C E - estimated value r) N J - estimated value, compound present •< u below CROL but above IDL c A - analysis did not pass EPA OA/OC CD O 0 O N - Presumptive evidence of the presence • r ct the material 1 NA - analysis not required Detection limits elevated if Dilution Farlor 1 and!or I°r:ent moisture >01 i rr ■r r — r NIS — — — NI — sir — SU — — or r lir 04!01/91 SIZE NAME: SOUTHOLD LANDFILL tone: 02-9008-48 TABLE 1 (CONT'D) SAMPLING DAIS: 12/4/90-12/5/90 SITE INSPECTION SAMPLE RESULTS EPA CASE NO.: 15486 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL LAB NAME: ASSOCIATED LABORATORIES CUTCHOQUE, NEW YORK INORGANICS Sample ID No. HYMN-GM1 NYNH-GMS NYMH-6Nc N11e-07 HYMN-GAB NrnN-1BL11 NYNH-G12;11S/MED) AlAN-GAl NYNN-GM4IDI+P) NYNH-SI AYNH-92(DUP) !raflic Report No. MBEF92 MBEF96 MBEF97 M9EF98 MBEF99 N/A MBEF93 MBEF94 MBEF95 M8EGI9 MBE620 Matri: , MAIER MAIER WATER WATER MATER cA WATER • MAIER WATER SOIL SOIL Units ug/L ug/I 09/1 ug/L ugh ugh ug/L ug 1 ugh mg/kg mg/kg Aluminum ; '3!! NO I 301 308 4640 5320 Antimony J J NA 99 3 E 71.4 E Arsenic ; MA 8.3 P.1 Barium ; J J 3 3 J NA 1 3 3 J J Beryllium ; MA J Cadmium ; NA Calcium 8160 E 56600 E 16501 f 28900 E 3 NR 14400 E t.800 E 63300 E J J Chromium NR 12 3 20 21.4 6.9 7.3 I Cobalt MA J J 1 Copper 213 E 156 E 185 E 59.2 E NA 84 E 31.4 31.4 19.1 E 16.1 F Iran ; 335 E 246 E 294 E 1550 E 3 NB 3440 E 10100 E 9;20 E 63)0 7280 Lead ; MA 63.7 E )5.6 E 85.8 14 1 Magnesium J 12400 9140 19200 1 AR 9570 43400 42000 J J Manganese 367 3 3 J NR J 1020 2900 102 E 106 E Mercury 0.1 0.8 0.' 0.6 NA 0.2 0.2 1.3 R A Nickel ; NA Potassium 3 J 3 J 3 NA J 167000 162000 J J Selenium A R R A A MR A R A Silver 3 J NR 3 7.7 Sodium 23100 12000 830 27400 8670 MR 21100 15000 153000 J J Thallium NA Vanadium 3 J NA 3 J 3 13 13.8 I /Inc 23.1 405 E 118 1 214 E 22.1 NA 21; E 11' E 195 E 44.6 E 44 E NOTES: Blank space - compoind analyzed for but not detected E - estimated value J - estimated value, compound present below (AOL but above 101 A - analysis did not pass EPA OA/OC NA - analysis not required zz O rb N I < I • l0 O Z p O CO • I A O 00 (l) 1 - - - - r N - i - - 6 MI - - -R E - - M '4/01/°1 SITE NAME: SOUINOLD LANDFILL TABLE 1 (CONT'D) TORI: 02-9008-48 SITE INSPECTION SAMPLE RESULTS SAMPLING DATES: 12/4190-12/5/90 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL EPA CASE NO.: 15486 CUTCHOQUE, NEM YORK LAB NAME: ASSOCIATED LABORATORIES INORGANICS Sample ID No. ; NYNH-S3 NYNH-S1 NTNN-SS NTNN-is NINH-S1 NYNH-58(MS/MSO) NYNH-59 119A9-RINI NYNH-RIN2 HYMN-RIN3 NYMH-RIN4 NYNH-TBL62 Traffic Report No. M1E621 MBEG22 MBEG23 MBEG24 M8E625 MBEG26 MBEG21 MBEG23 MBEG29 MBEG30 MBEG31 N/A Matrix SOIL SOIL SO11 SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL MATER MATER WATER MAIER N/A Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/Mg win ug/L ug/L ug/1 ug/L Aluminum 2140 4030 4310 12700 3080 1010 5280 J NA Antimony MA Arsenic 3 3.2 3.1 15.6 6.8 1 8.5 NA Barium 3 1 52 2 0 633 E 6I E 7 J J J J kA Beryllium 1.7 J NA Cadmium 8.5 NR Calcium 3 J 1300 E 5100 E 1500 E J 1 1 1 J 1 NA Chromium 3.3 6.3 5 4C.9 6.6 2.6 4.1 NA Cobalt 3 NR Copper 8.4 10.8 E 16.7 E 3020 E 51.1 E 12.8 E 7.8 J J J NA Iron 5010 4940 6120 15200 6640 1590 7800 3 1 1 A NA Lead 49.5 20.6 117 412 24.5 13.2 20.1 0.9 0 J NA Magnesium 3 3 J 1 3 3 3 J 3 3 3 NA Manganese 15.1 1 45.1 0 69.1 E 57.2 E 45.5 E 20.9 E 36.1 E J NA Mercury 8 A R 10.9 R 0.: 0.2 NR Nickel 3 NA Potassium J 3 J J J J 3 3 I NR Selenium 3 3 I 9.1 E 3 R A 9 NR Silver 3 1 24.3 2 2 3.1 NR Sodium J J 1 J J J 1 J J 1 NA Thallium NR Vanadium 3 3 1 3 J 3 11.9 NA lint 15.9 E R 134 E 1060 E 215 E R A 3 36.7 3 R NA NOTES: Blank space - compound analyzed for but not detected E - estimated value J - estimated value, compound present below CADI but above Mt R - analysis did not pass CPA BA/OC NO - analysis not required 2a o rD rV < 1 Z O O 00 • 1 A O CO r in 02-9008-48-SI Rev. No. 0 BLDG. I 4 i' I I� X X � -X X X x I `X x X FENCE x ''•• ".1......•' •• GARBAGE PAPER ..e,' u :'p� :o. •°''ej.e••a••,4°•'•o.;-- •: •':•.- '•'•. tt'. - - �� STAGING ' �, •I �' • o•' o:,`'•':.-...-°'•• �i -�/ I AREA WOODEDI. X •.•.`.o•...o. :'o.•o� .o .•; • ••o• o.• :.o•• dN/ O is '4.a °;-,...-i;••..-o, •.: • • '':.°; .:.o-•o.o:o•!• o's••� CONSTRUCTION 4ni : ' .;°.:• SAND PIT, -.'..�-','•s` DEBRIS q /i r _ _�� HOUSEHOLD o: Q:� �•1"�•o;p:. '.'o.. •.?.� ••• ;••� y_� .A,_ - it HAZARDOUS X o :` ,'—• . :d;�. o: .o;o, :;•:e.:a. .a• • _ i - �/�\ • WASTE = ' ,, l ISTAGING� • ••;o. .;o',:e.•'• I� 'i� //\ col AREA Q LLI x---..4.----- .. •a;o";•:•o:•••. •.' _ J J WASTE p • 'o•.::••o.:o �st COLLECTION Q �.:o•�• '`1 CENTER O .0 WOODED / ' .'-?o'•* 1 .;i ��,_ I WEIGH FENCE STATION )iii ' CORNER "B" sii�I : !I:it 3 v, GUARD Q S9 '� • rr SHACK S-69781 • • SLUDGE `"l:0:1',,-e.;;;•3;%1`.?..,-• Q FENCE X x DITCH °r...r.. .... •d� CORNER i? ] •---., ( P11/.. so.ei, [/ x z 1� �`t? Jac?'% tii s'� .0„/"-"\\ X x—._.___ �.��� S 68831 1 • w Q GW3,GW4A S-68916 41' ,/0:%, ,:' • 4/•;:r i 0 ❑ ❑ � 1 .os n MULCH PILES ♦ 111f I� 0• A • c3"P' 0 ?oa^,1 }a' IC.:C1 , 'c 9 �o',...SY..;': SCRAP METAL 1=- 1 4,.i.5 FIRE PILE CC Cc./..) j• HYDRANT W O 3! S1,S2 ❑ F z o /GW 1 x ..c-,7.4)..,..,••+ �C �r ;t.r.ell.r4.P•'•> .., d EAST POST OF x SG - •�f °� '•o 9. I TUTHILL ROAD GATE FARM _n.c - , , ..1 • S3• uJ1I' '• x SSE ( O 1 S7■'N FORMER WOODED FORMER 4 TRAILER .3.•:.*TIRES • ❑ LAGOON A —••• —�... LAGOON B TANKS w (�] FENCE a x x• -1 a' LEGEND x X X---------X x— j� MONITORING WELL =1 • SURFACE SOIL SAMPLE t7 11 II SUBSURFACE SOIL SAMPLE WOODED _ A GROUNDWATER SAMPLE FARM FIGURE 3 • SAMPLE LOCATION MAP , Nuwasei= SOUTHOLD LANDFILL. CUTCHOQUE. N. v_ NOT TO SCALE i I cC RA'T1❑N 02-9008-48-SI I ` Rev. No. 0 1 PNo 15 0 00 . • tillik ;. • .6, I Duck Pond _ . i /, Point � ` 37^ /.1.40 OG`. 0 ��� n_ ./• �•� � .: 56.!'. 51�l. ••••'' c-, Oc Q1A( � GW8 SOUTHOLD LF .' -Sound GW6 �.� « , '04,0 GW 5• •. ''' �� , • /0;1 F •-.•4•:); •'J /'� •� / �F / \`moi I 9 • e s i" - 47 ` I N. • • Cutchogue Sta • -° BM• Eu1ENE _ _ 10 Sacred Heart co • • y�I> • Cutchougue _ . \ • ..' . _ ` H0 L� 'D Sch '•; ,?3 .off` ,_ �` `'\ Cutchogue„to '.. AO 4. .- , "I-b....7 ft-4O\ NI `7S BM 32, E� r zo . ' • •.. 0 .•\ • •Cutchogue , ;• ? •, �a�:01 1. I , . \. of North Fork OM '4.'-::::--1 20 •I;� p Country Club i NEW YORK � \\\ _ _ a • t I �� o t QUAD) MATTITUCK HILLS. N.Y. IOFF—SITE TAPWATER SAMPLE LOCATION MAP FIGURE 4 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL, CUTCHOGUE, N.Y. ILJS ISCALE 1'-2000 T�V 02-y�O8-48-SI Rev. No. 0 PART IV: HAZARD ASSESSMENT GROUNDWATER ROUTE 1. Describe the likelihood of a release of contaminant(s) to the groundwater as follows: observed release, suspected release, or none. Identify contaminants detected or suspected and provide a rationale for attributing them to the site. For observed release, define the supporting analytical evidence. An observed release of contaminants from the site to groundwater has occurred. On December 4-5, 1990, NUS Corporation Region 2 FIT performed a sampling site inspection during which eight groundwater and nine soil samples were collected. Analyses of the samples identified contaminants attributable to the site in groundwater downgradient of the site. Chlorobenzene was detected in samples NYNH-GW3 (24 ug/L) and NYNH-GW-4(23 ug/L). Both samples were collected from monitoring well No. 5-68916 which is located downgradient of the site. Chlorobenzene was not detected in samples collected from upgradient wells ' (instrument detection level was 5 ug/L). Background information indicates that waste solvents were deposited in unlined lagoons onsite. Previous analytical data confirmed the presence of benzene products and other solvents in grab samples collected from the lagoons in 1984 and 1985. Trace amounts of 1,4-dichlorobenzene and 1,2-dichloroethane were also detected in samples NYNH-GW3 and NYNH-GW4 above instrument detection limits but below contract required detection limits. The contaminant 1,2-dichloropropane was detected in samples NYNH-GW3 (15 ug/L), NYNH- GW4 (15 ug/L), and in groundwater sample NYNH-GW6 (9 ug/L) collected from a private residence downgradient of the site. The contaminant cannot be conclusively attributed to site; however, 1,2-dichloropropane had been previously detected in a sample collected from well No.S-68916 by the SCDHS in 1987. The following inorganic contaminants were detected at elevated concentrations in ' groundwater samples NYNH-GW3 and NYNH-GW4 respectively; aluminum (301 ug/L, 308 ug/L), calcium (65,800 estimated (E) ug/L, 63,300 E ug/L), chromium (20 ug/L, 23.4 ug/L), iron (10,100 E ug/L, 9,720 E ug/L), lead (63.7 E ug/L, 75.6 E ug/L), magnesium (43,400 ug/L, 42,000 ug/L), manganese (3,020 ug/L, 2,900 ug/L), potassium (167,000 ug/L, 162,000 ug/L), and sodium (158,000 ug/L, 153,000 ug/L). Since these elevated concentrations range from approximately 3 times above background to greater than 35 times above background (potassium) the landfill is strongly suspected of adversely impacting on groundwater quality via metals. These results confirm analytical data from several previous sampling events. Notable concentrations of chromium (12.3 ug/L) and iron (3,440 E ug/L) were detected in groundwater sample NYNH-GW2. Sample NYNH-GW2 was collected from a production well located on site upgradient of; but in close proximity to,the landfill. Analyses of soil samples identified contaminated soils on site. Soil sample NYNH-S6 was collected from a layer of sediment in the former lagoons located in the northwest corner of the site. Notable concentrations of the following contaminants were detected in sample NYNH-S6: barium (693 E mg/kg), copper (3020 E mg/kg), chromium (40.9 mg/kg), lead (412 mg/kg), silver (24.3 mg/kg),zinc(1,060 E mg/kg),and 4-chloroaniline(10,000 ug/kg). ' Notable concentrations of lead were detected in soil samples NYNH-S1 (85.8 mg/kg), NYNH-S2 (74.1 mg/kg),and NYNH-S5(117 mg/kg). ' Ref. No. 19 02-9008-48-SI ' Rev. No. 0 2. Describe the aquifer of concern; include information such as depth, thickness, geologic composition, areas of karst terrain, permeability, overlying strata, confining layers, interconnections,discontinuities,depth to water table,groundwater flow direction. ' The sequence of geologic formations beneath the site in desending order are as follows: the Pleistocene glacial deposits,The Magothy formation, the Raritan Formation, and bedrock. The Pleistocene glacial deposits serve as the aquifer of concern. In the vicinity of the site this formation consists of outwash deposits from the Harbor Hill Moraine located along the North Shore. The deposits are composed of fine to very coarse quartoze sand, and pebble to boulder sized gravel, interbedded with layers of glacial lacustrine deposits of silt and clay. The permeability is estimated to range between 10'3 and 10'5 cm/sec. The glacial deposits extend to a depth approximately 200 feet. A clay layer approximately 50 feet in thickness separate the upper and lower portions of the glacial aquifer. The clay layer is encountered at a depth of approximately 120 feet and acts as a local confining unit. The freshwater-saltwater interface occurs within this clay layer in the vicinity of the site. The Magothy formation consists of highly permeable sand and gravel deposits interbedded with lenses of clay and silt. The formation, which tilts towards the southeast, is encountered at a depth of approximately 200 feet and extends to a depth of approximately 600 feet in the vicinity of the site. The Raritan formation is composed of two members,the Raritan Clay and the underlying Lloyd Sand. The Raritan Clay serves as a confining layer separating the Magothy Aquifer from the Lloyd Sand Aquifer. The Lloyd Sand overlies the bedrock. Bedrock is encountered at a depth of approximately 800 feet below ground surface. The depth to water table is approximately 47 feet and the direction of groundwater flow is northwest towards Long Island Sound. Ref. No. 21,22 3. Is a designated well head protection area within 4 miles of the site? ' There are two well head protection areas located within 4 miles of the site. Two wells which contribute to the Greenport public supply system are located approximately 3.5 miles northeast of the site and two public supply wells operated by the Suffolk County Water Authority are located approximately 3.2 miles southwest of the site. Ref. Nos. 23, 33, 34,35 4. What is the depth from the lowest point of waste disposal/storage to the highest seasonal level of the saturated zone of the aquifer of concern? The depth from the lowest point of waste disposal to the highest seasonal level of the saturated zone of the aquifier of concern is 0 feet. There has been an observed release of contaminants from the site to groundwater. Ref. No.7,pp. 35, 137 5. What is the permeability value of the least permeable continuous intervening stratum between the ground surface and the aquifer of concern? The permeability value of the least permeable continuous intervening stratum between the ' ground surface and the aquifier of concern ranges from approximatley 10'3 to 10'5 cm/sec. Ref. No 22, 24 6. What is the net precipitation for the area? The net precipitation for the area ranges from approximately 18 to 23 inches. Ref. No. 22 p. 5-19, 5-24, 5-25, 5-30 I 02-9008-48-SI IRev. No. 0 7. What is the distance to and depth of the nearest well that is currently used for drinking purposes? The nearest well that is currently used for drinking purposes is a domestic well located approximately 150 feet south of the facility. The well is approximately 85 feet deep. ' Ref. No. 17 p.29 ' 8. If a release to groundwater is observed or suspected, determine the number of people that obtain drinking water from wells that are documented or suspected to be located within the contamination boundary of the release. ' Although there is an observed release of contaminants from the site to groundwater,there are no drinking supply wells documented or suspected to be located within the contamination boundary of the release. ' Ref. No. 19 9. Identify the population served by wells located within 4 miles of the site that draw from the aquifer of concern. Distance Population 0-;mi 69 >;-;mi 77 >=- 1 mi 1,086 >1 -2mi 980 >2-3 mi 3,671 >3-4 mi 6,095 Ref. No. 25,30,33,34,35, 39 10. Identify uses of groundwater within 4 miles of the site(i.e. private drinking source, municipal source,commercial,irrigation,unuseable). Groundwater within 4 miles of the site is the sole source for drinking water, commercial and irrigation uses. Ref. No. 22 p.4 SURFACE WATER ROUTE 11. Describe the likelihood of a release of contaminant(s) to surface water as follows: observed release,suspected release,or none. Identify contaminants detected or suspected and provide a rationale for attributing them to the site. For observed release, define the supporting analytical evidence. Since there is no apparent migration route from the site to surface water, there is little or no potential for release of contaminants from the site to surface water. Ref. Nos. 17, 39 I JL7VVV �V Ji ' Rev. No. 0 12. Identify the nearest downslope surface water. If possible, include a description of possible surface drainage patterns from the site. The nearest downslope surface water is the Long Island Sound located 0.9 mile north of the site. There is no apparent migration route from the site to Long Island Sound. The intervening terrain is level farmland transected by a single paved road. Additionally, most of the north end of the site is currently below grade. Ref. No. 17, 39 13. What is the distance to the nearest downslope surface water? Measure the distance along a ' course that runoff can be expected to follow. The nearest downslope surface water is the Long Island Sound located 0.9 mile north of the site; however,there is no apparent migration pathway from the site to surface water. Ref. Nos. 17, 39 14. Determine the floodplain that the site is located within. The site is located in an area of minimal flooding,above the 500-year flood zone. ' Ref. No. 26 15. What is the 2-year 24-hour rainfall? The 2-year 24-hour rainfall is approximately 3.25 inches. Ref. No. 27 16. Identify drinking water intakes in surface waters within 15 miles downstream of the site. For ' each intake identify: the distance from the point of surface water entry, population served, and stream flow at the intake location. No drinking water intakes in surface waters are located within 15 miles downslope of the site, since all surface waters downslope of the site are saline. Ref. No. 39 17. Identify fisheries that exist within 15 miles downstream of the point of surface water entry. For each fishery specify the following information: Fishery Water Body Type Flow(cfs) Long Island Sound Coastal Tidal Waters Not Applicable Ref. No.29 18. Identify sensitive environments that exist within 15 miles of the point of surface water entry. For each sensitive environment specify the following: Environment Water Body Type Flow(cfs) Migratory Pathway and Spawning Area Coastal Tidal Waters Not Applicable (Long Island Sound) Wetlands Coastal Tidal Waters Not Applicable Ref. No. 29,39 02-9008-48-Si Rev. No. 0 19. If a release to surface water is observed or suspected, identify any intakes, fisheries, and sensitive environments from question Nos. 16-18 that are or may be located within the contamination boundary of the release. No release to surface water is observed or suspected. Ref. Nos. 17,39 SOIL EXPOSURE PATHWAY 20. Determine the number of people that occupy residences or attend school or day care on or within 200 feet of the site property. Approximately 19 people reside within 200 feet of the site property. Ref. No. 20 21. Determine the number of people that work on or within 200 feet of the site property. Nine people work on site full time and several more work on site part time. Ref. No. 17, p. 20 1 22. Identify terrestrial sensitive environments on or within 200 feet of the site property. ' There are no sensitive environments on or within 200 feet of the site property. Ref. No. 31,32 ' AIR ROUTE ' 23. Describe the likelihood of release of contaminants to air as follows: observed release, suspected release, or none. Identify contaminants detected or suspected and provide a rationale for attributing them to the site. For observed release define the supporting ' analytical evidence. A release of contaminants to the air is suspected. An inspection conducted by the NYSDEC on September 26, 1979 indicated significant concentrations of methane along the western ' property line. The SCDHS conducted a methane gas survey of the site on July 24, 1981. The survey confirmed that "methane migration in high concentrations exist beyond site perimeters on the west and north sides of the dump."Vegetation damage was reported up to 100 feet from the landfill perimeters. The damage consisted of browning of potato plant foliage. Ref. Nos.7,p. 108, 109, 113, 114, 130 24. Determine populations that reside within 4 miles of the site. Distance Population 0-;mi 69 > --: mi 77 >Z-1 mi 1,086 >1 -2 mi 980 ' >2-3 mi 3,671 >3-4mi 2,615 Ref. No. 25 02-9008-48-SI Rev. No. 0 25. Identify sensitive environments and wetlands acreage within:mile of the site. Sensitive Environment Type Distance ' There are no sensitive enviroments or wetlands within 0.5 mile of the site. Ref. Nos. 31,32 26. If a release to air is observed or suspected,determine the number of people that reside or are Pe P P suspected to reside within the area of air contamination from the release. No people reside within the area of suspected air contamination. Ref. Nos. 7, p.113, 114 27. If a release to air is observed or suspected, identify any sensitive environments, listed in question No. 25, that are or may be located within the area of air contamination from the release. There are no sensitive environments located within the area of suspected air contamination. ' Ref. No. 31,32 I 1 1 ATTACHMENT 1 tt" • 1 UL-yUUt5-4 -�1 Rev No. 0 I 1 iSOUTHOLD LANDFILL CUTCHOQUE,NEW YORK CONTENTS EXHIBIT A: SITE RECONNAISSANCE PHOTOGRAPH LOG EXHIBIT B: SITE INSPECTION PHOTOGRAPH LOG 1 I I 1 t Rev. No. 0 I i EXHIBIT A ' PHOTOGRAPH LOG SOUTHOLD LANDFILL SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK SITE RECONNAISSANCE: NOVEMBER 8, 1990 I I 1 uc.-7uuo-4o Rev. No. 0 ISOUTHOLD LANDFILL SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK INOVEMBER 8, 1990 PHOTOGRAPH INDEX IALL PHOTOGRAPHS WERE TAKEN BY PAUL BAUER Photo Number Description Time 1 1P-1 Photo looking southwest at dumpster by fence near guard 1103 shack. I 1P-2 Photo looking southwest at pile of scrap metal in 1104 southwest corner of property. I 1P-3 Photo looking northwest at shredder and mulch piles on 1121 west side of property. 1P-4 Photo looking southwest at pile of tires in southwest 1128 II corner of property. 1P-5 Photo looking north at two tanks along western edge of 1135 11 property. 1P-6 Panoramic view of western side of site taken from 1146 Inorthern boundary. 1P-1 Panoramic view of western side of site taken from 1146 northern boundary. II1P-8 Panoramic view of western side of site taken from 1146 northern boundary. I1P-9 Panoramic view of western side of site taken from 1146 northern boundary. II1P-10 Photo looking northeast at large sand pit in the 1155 northeast corner of the property. II 1P-11 Photo looking southwest at southern portion of northern 1208 lagoon (former). I 1P-12 Photo looking northwest at northern portion of northen 1208 lagoon (former). 1P-13 Photo looking west at southern lagoon (former) . 1210 II 1P-14 Photo lookingsouthwest at puddle and sludge pile. 1225 9 I 1P-15 Photo looking southwest at working face of construction 1314 debris portion of landfill . I 1P-16 Photo looking south at working face of garbage portion 1354 of landfill . 1P-17 Photo looking north at sign by guardhouse. 1402 I 1P-18 Photo looking west at gas monitoring well on southside 1412 of landfill . I Rev. No. 0 ' SOUTHOLD LANDFILL SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK NOVEMBER 8, 1990 PHOTOGRAPH INDEX (cont'd) 11 Photo Number Description Time 1P-19 Photo looking east at Southold town collection center. 1417 1 1 1 t 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I - n II � SOUTHOLD L 44DFiLL. :OUTHOLD, ;.Ebi YORK II i I 4 II I i are_rtz-‘6* 1P-1 November 8, 1990 1103 Photo looking southwest at dumpster by fence near IIguard shack. I 1 II I _ I - sem: +►-�-=- .r-- 1P-2 November 8, 1990 1104 I 'Moto lookina southwest at sole of scrap metal in -9uthwest :orner of o-opertv. I I J2-9008- ';�- - TTiV �ev. ��o.�0 I I SOUTHCLD L.". DF:LL, COUTHOLC . ..EW YORK 1 1 I i 1 1 _ h' r i ��' �-�. 1= . .-_,4"*.A.Z 'Inipor••• r�74. f ---~'" ' ' ``'". ... _ �"! _ . I :.�... + .......i...........i.... _ i „e,�,=!' M I1P-3 November 8, 1990 1121 Photo looking northwest at shredder and mulch piles on west side of property. 1 I I , "s F I . l ' P-a November R . '_?90 1128 IPhoto lookinc southwest at c; le of tires in southwest II I _ NiusTI _ ON e v. ;o. 1 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL, S3UTHOLD, NEW YORK 1 1 IF 111 1 I 1 ! .r • / -• ';*�Z . �2;_��r _ 'rte'-�a1+s - 4 :._ 1 ' - - . . - II 1 1?-5 November 3, 1990 1135 Photo looking north at two tanks along western egae Jrocer•cy. I II I IH 1 1 I MN M ON N r-. MO MN UN MI ON r IN MI - MI MI MN - M E = NUS ____ _________ 02-9008-48-SI CORPORATION Rev . No . 0 • SOUI ULD LANDFILL , SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK • • • • • • a • . -rte ' �_ ,`•r '. +.t • _. . ice . _ l� )144111‘ (. tit 1..7r+' h 4 arr• r r 1P-67 November 8, 1990 1146 Panoramic view of western side of site taken from northern boundary. an — NM — ION / M IN r — r — - - - - - - - I NUBi12 tlllUti ,,,,1 ,,_ ,.,,CORPORATION Rev . No. 0 SUIT I I ii iI Ii LANDF ILL , SOU I IIOLIO, (ILII YORK •r r" "'to j iii;yap..• 11:,c._ .... .„. ,.,. .. k, 1.1..11: ' ••V • .•' t :. , tiall,fl it Altio• i ,+•'C'-^y '�\1'Rk••`. . tr ,��.• ,�Mi `s•,�(N;.' +nW�. WE • Jt T •IW ""3 fi 4 4. '�' a t • y _ ,y , � ' a . . . , I ....1.... J • 1P-8,9 flovemb,A8, 1990 1146 Panorami, view of western side of site taken from northern boundary. I . HNUB 02-9002-48-S1 t---1--J CCIFFORATCN Rev. No. (i IISOUTHOLD LANDFILL, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11 r I II i . - .,. .-----.. • • ......x-: ; 10"-, :-..-7 , _-. r_ _ 1P-10 November 8, 19c'O 1155 II Photo looking northeast at large sand pit in the northeast corner of the property. II e 1 .i J I/ , . - "101SZiticAfrO„., c., :-,:tr ' • Ot .7 ,....?.,. : • 4- :111 '11"*. .6'.. A I fir- ,4 ,'*%-\3' ,- '•' - - t a`•'r_ • ,� t�, , .-ft '' '-- si • ,,,-; . . .....4 r . . 'V. 1 • , , .• 1 1P--ii i;ovenher ;,, 1(.7.90i20£ Photo lookiro sou :! west i.' souti ern portion of ncrthern lagoon (former) . II I _-_-_- NUB --r-� 02-9008-4^-S � coFIRev. No . 0 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 117 :.....' . , _ ,.$1,. " I r.:*1:- ..1.:11.":7--:vim _ . . , . 1 i r . . . . , +r4 r Y k4b= ,�-fix f _ , ►p - }. '�, ' k- . $. , , : ,,r r �+ tet`. :.. I . , - 4-lerti--.--‹-Vi.'r!tg--1 - :. . , �"� : ,,-;. .A , y�l F �t t!� f� may' -d• �� N L • - + t I a ��f�+— L V 1P-12 November 8, 199 1'0° Photo looking northwest at northern portion of IInorthern lagoon (former) . II 1 r a +i 9 Amt., -' 3..,_L,. . 1 z - .7tipir N.1.;' Art it : : �, y a , I 1P-13 'yovember 8, 1990y 1210 Photo looking west at southern lagoon (former) . I -- ;-;_s: _ ccs=pcswErmi R.v.NuEB o. �0 OUTHOLD LANDFILL, :OUTNOLO, .,cis` YORK 1 1 , I I - { .....,7' . 2c. ......-- .-' ,..7. "_ II 1• 14 November O, 1990 1225 Photo looking southwest at puddle and sludge 1 pile. I 1 _ 1 1 II _ Y : 42 •d - 71. I v - ~, , I• �1� wf '!�'�!� .moi i '♦`plc."tet- .iv► .. '"`. r _ r 1 + _. - _ November 8, 1990 131 , _77:77S �Ci"- -no-, ii ,.... __ Nue I , _____ ccppicRA-roN i :--OLITHC,! D '...,-';: -',F::! , '.::,..1J-TH ;L'..,H ',:=W Yn.PK. i . 11 1 I ! I . , 1 I I .. . .. s• •.. v - .4tit ' . ,--4100 I - •,•Mama 11,1114 an dm- - - - • -01' •-• - - --..•.:,fskii.,..2.• - . • - — ..„r. . • . , -- : "ftig,..-_. • ''' ----.".:*-• .4:- :vim .04.-‘*, - . 4 -. _ al .4, Abli .; '•_. ....; - •••,,zt.„„:;41'7% .P--... • ..4 . 1 -...... -s I -. .. . . ....••- . : -1 -.k....'''' - •:.0....'•!'-'-' 4;. --:-.•. 4. "- ' • -. : . . - •. - . . •t• • . • , - ...•4- :. - •--: , -- - •-: - - , - -. . - — YIL-:-• ` ' - - il • - : . •--t-:',...,-_,• . . Ve.Is;•-;„.,.,,.... .,,c,:...,. - ., • - 103r- • ...-4,4i*"‘"r -:.• ; 4._401:,, r ,"IA _ ..... -„,.. ..01••• - - • -4Ift. - *le - ' - -4.- 11,. 4',• • •• • ..... • et 11.., .. 4.0 __.. I . .... iiiii5•f...6•011.,Cel ,. . • 2 .1P . Mb i I 1P-16 November 8, 1990 1354. Photo looking south at working face of garbage Iportion of 7andfill . II I 1 I II '1.E.V,F. DEP(NIT %I‘TVRIII ,N iHt Pli()PEfi 1iit A II • .... 7 -J . • 1 •7.46.....t 7.-..-...:-_-:-..,.;_. - • .0....- -..... •,.- - . ., II . . -. f• . --. - ----- :f •- •:-.4-';,...,,, • .'' ' , ; ., , _',-. ,.. .- . ri,, :.-1.••, . - - • • V' R. ,''''' r . ••%. . ' — .,• , , • i ,1111110,' , ," 1 .t, , '", • .4.•• ' ..., ..1 ,•• S. o • I 1 i . .,./ . . ..,. .. -..F., . .. It ‘„- _ . ... IfT, • ' 1 ''''• , ' ' ' . • ' — ••••1 . — • _ • , 1 ' • ' ' I . — . - _. — L. november 0. 1990 'Thgto ' .-..oAi rc "ort :7 ',1 cm by aua&house. 1402 11 i . ~ N 0�- -�" a r--r 00g-40-si Rev. No. 0 1 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL, SCUTHOLD, NEW YORK 1 . 1 I .- • 1P-18November 8, 1990 1412 Photo looking west at gas monitoring well on southside of landfill . I - - i.., K.. •. S 2 .s_ I46_041 .T 1 - O - O /11141 1 •Aiim �w - ' i.'"!l�-4dlitilir y+.- moi -111 - -. 1P-19 November 8, 19901417 Photo 'oGklrn coos} P." cn,,, center. I UL-yu(L5-4d-J. Rev. No. 0 1 I I I 1 EXHIBIT B PHOTOGRAPH LOG SOUTHOLD LANDFILL 1 SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK SITE INSPECTION: DECEMBER 4-5, 1990 I 1 I I I U4-7uu0-40-.): Rev. No. 0 ' SOUTHOLD LANDFILL SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK I DECEMBER 4, 1990 PHOTOGRAPH INDEX IIALL PHOTOGRAPHS WERE TAKEN BY PAUL BAUER Photo Number Description Time il2P-1 Photo of Mike Gallagher collecting GW8. 1420 2P-2 Photo of Mike Gallagher collecting GW7. 1455 II2P-3 Photo of Mike Gallagher collecting GW6. 1535 2P-4 Photo of Mike Gallagher collecting GW5. 1605 II2P-5 Photo of Mike Gallagher collecting GW1. 1640 IIDECEMBER 5, 1990 II2P-6 Photo of Claire Baruxis collecting GW3. 1019 2P-7 Photo of Claire Baruxis collecting GW4. 1028 1 2P-8 Photo of Claire Baruxis collecting GW2. 1125 2P-9 Photo of Claire Baruxis collecting S9. 1211 I2P-10 Photo of Claire Baruxis collecting S7. 1320 II2P-11 Photo of Claire Baruxis collecting S8. 1347 2P-12 Photo of Dave Florin collecting S6. 1407 11 2P-13 Photo of Dave Florin collecting S3. 1458 2P-14 Photo of Dave Florin collecting S4. 1527 11 2P-15 Photo of Dave Florin collecting S5. 1556 II2P-16 Photo of Dave Florin collecting Si. 1610 2P-17 Photo of Dave Florin collecting S2. 1615 II II II II I ( NUS 02-9008-a8-S Rev. 1). 0 1 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK I ,'T . If tri p IP I . Oe . s i + �# pit T - -- i 13 ^' l,l, i * 'I� if ll! 111` ! I!I 111 ,4 IIF !/M, „I '4M, al M,1,4 II ,rNI I Gr!n 2P-1 December 4, 1990 1420 Photo of Mike Gallagher collecting Ga. 1 I „2 ! ., . 1: v. y.3 *1 i. r 7111:141f ARP M ,1il -Ntor 1 f. A I - -4 *,.c2-. -`-' 1i44,%..,. 1 i'-' . y .0 . ' _ I i 111111 2P-2 December 4, 1990 1455 II Photo of 'like Gallagher collecting GW7. I 1 i ! _____H-LTi Nue 02-9008-2.8-S: '---L•--I Rev. No. 0 IISOUTHOLD LANDFILL, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK - 1 , .. . lir '. sit. `--L� 11 j. • }T I 1 s. II2P-3 December 4, 1990 1535 Photo of Mike Gallagher collecting GW6. II 1 s 4111. i . .‘y\r,`3`-.. 4.-.._ .- • .;• .,v ate, - i. 1 vim. • S . ...r 2P-4 December 4, 1990 1605 Photo of Mike Gallacher collectina GL15. 1 � NL �� J2-9008-40-SI 1 Rev. No. C 11 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK I - 7::"11117N.I I .a I \. r - ` • 406 pr 114F • la Z44 . 1 2P-5 December 4, 1990 1640 Photo of Mike Gallagher collecting GW1. I 1 I ! • I • -. til. . wincej)tU4 - Too•_ i .. .......... --Toe_...I.L. - via- sawstre 97, 1 2P-6 December 5, 1990 1019 Photo of Clairc Bar!�v- c --11 ,,,.4,,, .; r".)? i ' I _____, 1 1 ____, Nus 02-9008-48-SI Rev. No. 0 ISOUTHOLD LANDFILL, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 1 , ' 4414, 1 aciumew `14 ow, .4..0„, , lc", , i.- i I •Vi . ,, 1 , , --- 1400. , II2P-7 December 5, 1990 1028 Photo of Claire Baruxis collecting 0414. I II ' . . ' ' aa I ill I k i I APe '?/ .1r Y.le&Y., II 1 2P-8 December 5, 1990 1125 IIPhoto of Claire Baruxis collectins GW2. 1 _____ I _____-___ Nius _ _ _ _ __ _.. , _ - . _ iaATlc:N = I ,TL :_ . V `L j / 'i . I % 4 ..•\ r 1 - 4 7,--'``` t) --1'. 1 ,.4Zipi, 1 I .k. ... f I2°-11 December 5, 1990 1347 Photo of Claire Baruxis collecting S8. I I 4 - , ilfel A. , \:i! - I r it ♦. , f • !y w _ _ 1 1 I J -� . . - - 1 . _ : c '-- " 1'290 1-07 II ! -- . LII ?_-900 T�...YV Rev. No. SOUTHOLD LANDFILL, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK I 1 1 I II ' r %. ' ` ate. • t * 1 • Ii \ / * wr r II 2P-13December 5, 1990 1458 Photo of Dave Florin collecting S3. II II • - I N I I -- I I ^0_ ', ^ornn(+er F 1 O9O 1X77 oLo or Lave Florin .:oiicc:;ng a4. _____-__ Lis :-,2-9008-2,8-S:T'<�iV ev. :o SOUTHOLD LANDFILL, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK I 1 I . IF i If. ► - . . ir i ' •0 ' . i .ol I Z ?4 - Y . " �'. . I IM A i III t \., .-"NI 1, .. r , ,, .,.\ ,..._ N .:A I 2P-15 December 5, 1990 1556 Photo of Dave Florin collecting S5. I I d :k' 1 - n' — -� - I �s , I F 1 : _ tr- , . t,idyifi _ '- ,- , ..4 ...,. . _ , I 'fes „.71,04 ,iiie, ,,,.. "? _ _ . December . 1 0O # c10 I I --........_ N us ____ .TION "?2-9000-4F-S: Rev. No. 0 ISOUTHOLD LANDFILL , SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK I I 1 1 I I 1 ' it ' t ,, Ai : • , ,_ I 1 -f - / .., . _ ` � lfr r ` — 0 \ _ _� L a I _ ; s 'fdr de `.10. 2P-17 December 5, 1990 1615 IPhoto of Dave Florin collecting S2. I I f 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 02-9008-48-S1 ' Rev. No. 0 ' REFERENCES 1. Letter from Joseph D' Aprile, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook, New York, to Raymond Dean, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold, Southold, New York. July 18, 1978. 2. Suffolk County Department of Health Services Memorandum from R. Olsen to File, Subject: ' Town of Southold-East End Survey; Mattituck Airbase,Airway Drive,Mattituck, March 8, 1979. 3. Letter from Paul Lappano, Assistant Sanitary Engineer, New York Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook, New York to Raymond Dean, Superintendent of Highways,Town of Southold,Southold, New York. April 10, 1979. 4. Letter from Brij M. Shrivastava, H2M Corporation, Riverhead, New York, to Morris Bruckman, New York Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook, New York. February 13, 1981. S. Letter from James H. Heil, Regional Solid Waste Engineer, New York Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook, New York to William Pell III, Supervisor, Town of Southold,Southold, New York. August 4, 1983. 6. Letter from James H. Heil, Regional Solid Waste Engineer, New York Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook, New York, to William Pell III, Supervisor, Town of Southold,Southold, New York. August 25, 1983. 7. Phase I Investigation, Southold Landfill, prepared by Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Inc., New York, New York, for New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of ' Solid and Hazardous Waste,Albany, New York, December 1985. 8. Letter from Paul M. Roth, Regional Solid Waste Engineer, New York Department of Environmental Conservation,Stony Brook, New York,to Francis S. Murphy, Supervisor, Town of Southold,Southold, New York. March 12, 1986. ' 9. Facility Inspection Report, Southold Landfill, Brian Coyle, Inspector, Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, August 29, 1986. ' 10. Facility Inspection Report, Southold Landfill, Brian Coyle, Inspector, Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, November 17, 1986. ' 11. Site Description of Cutchoque Landfill prepared by Brian Coyle, NYSDEC, Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste,January 29, 1987. 12. Letter from Paul M. Roth, Regional Solid Waste Engineer, NYSDEC, Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste,Stony Brook, New York,to Francis J. Murphy, Supervisor, Town of Southold, Southold, New York. February 10, 1987. 13. Letter from Gary E. Loesch, H2M Group, Melville, New York, to Robert Becherer, Solid Waste Division, NYDEC,Stony Brook, New York. April 14, 1987. 14. Letter from Robert A. Becherer, Regional Hazardous Waste Engineer, Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste Engineer, Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste, NYSDEC, Stony Brook, New York,to Francis J. Murphy,Supervisor,Town of Southold,Southold, New York. April 29, 1987. 02-9008-48-SI Rev. No. 0 ' REFERENCES(CONT'D) 15. Suffolk County Health Services Laboratory, Chemical Examination of Water, Sewage, Industrial ' Waste and Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Division of Medical Legal Investigations and Forensic Sciences, Public Health Laboratory, Laboratory Analysis of samples collected from Southold Landfill on March 30, 1987. 16. Review comments on Part 360 and Phase II Hydrogeologic Investigation Work Plan, Southold Landfill, NYSDEC,August 25, 1990. 17. Field Notebook No. 0678, Southold Landfill, TDD No. 02-9008-48, Site Inspection, NUS Corporation Region 2 FIT, Edison, New Jersey, November 8, 1990. 18. Field Notebook No. 0692, Southold Landfill, TDD No. 02-9008-48, Site Inspection, NUS Corporation Region 2 FIT, Edison, New Jersey, December 5, 1990. 19. Contract Laboratory Program, InTech Biolabs, Inc., Case No. 15486, Associated Laboratories, Inc., Case No. 15486, Laboratory Analysis from NUS Corporation Region 2 FIT Site Inspection conducted December 4-5, 1990. 20. Project Note: from Paul Bauer, NUS Corporation, Region 2 FIT, to Southold Landfill Project File, TDD No. 02-9008-48, Subject: Calculation of population within 200 feet of property, February 5, 1991. ' 21. Report on the Occurrence and Movement of Agricultural Chemicals in Groundwater: North Fork of Suffolk County, Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Bureau of Water Resources, New York,August 1982. 22. Suffolk County Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan, Volume I, Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Division of Environmental Health, New York, Dvirka & Bartilucci, Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.,January 1987. 23. Proposed New York State Wellhead Protection Program, NYSDEC, Division of Water, Albany, New York, May 1990. 24. Davis, S.N., Porosity and Permeability of Natural Materials in Flow-Through Porous Media, R.J.M. DeWest ed.,Academic Press, New York, 1969. 25. General Sciences Corporation, Graphical Exposure Modeling Systems (GEMS). Landover, Maryland, 1986. 26. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Rate Map, Town of Southold, New York,Suffolk County,Community Panel Number 360813 0093 D,April 17, 1985. 27. Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Government Printing Office,Washington, D.C., undated. 1 28. U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey Topographic Maps, Eastern United States 1:250,000 scale, "Hartford, Conn.; NY; NJ; Mass." 1962, revised 1975, "New York, NY; NJ; Conn." 1960, Revised 1979. ' 29. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Services Program, Atlantic Coast Ecological Inventory User's Guide and Information Base,September 1980. I 32-9008-48-Si ' Rev No 0 ' REFERENCES (CONT'D) 30. Project Note: from Paul Bauer, NUS Corporation, Region 2 FIT, to Southold Landfill Project File, TDD No. 02-9008-48,Subject: Calculation of Population on Groundwater,March 25, 1991. 31. U.S. Department of the Interior, Office of Fish and Wildlife Services, National Wetlands Inventory Overlays, "Southold, NY" March 1980, "Mattituck Hills, NY" March 1980. 32. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Fish and Wildlife, Bureau of Wildlife, Significant Habitat Overlays, "Hartford, Conn., NY, NJ, Mass." scale ' 1:250,000, March 1981. 33. Suffolk County Water Authority, Water Distribution System Map 18-0, Westhampton District, Mattituck, Town of Southold Distribution System, November 21, 1988. 34. Telecon Note: Conversation between Raymond Jacobs, Supervisor, Town of Southold, New York,and Paul Bauer, NUS Corporation, Region 2 FIT, March 25, 1991. ' 35. Telecon Note: Conversation between Jerry Hickson, Greenport Utilities, Greenport, New York, and Paul Bauer, NUS Corporation, Region 2 FIT, March 25, 1991. 36. Aerial Photograph: Southold Landfill, Photo No. 3-09, AeroGraphics Corp., Bohemia, New York, February 25, 1988. 37. U.S. EPA Superfund Program, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System(CERCLIS), List 4: Site Alias Location Listing,p.452, March 6, 1991. 38. New York State Board of Elections, New York State Legislative Task Force on Demographic Research and Reapportionment, New York State Congressional Districts, 1984. 39. Four Mile Vicinity Map based on U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey Topographic Maps, 7.5 minute series, "Southold, NY", 1956;"Mattituck Hills, NY", 1956; "Mattituck, NY", 1956; "Southampton, NY" 1956. 40. Project Note: From Paul Bauer, NUS Corporation, Region 2 FIT,to Southold Landfill Project File, TDD No. 02-9008-48,Subject: Calculation of site acreage,March 28, 1991. 41. Telecon Note: Conversation between Jim Buncheck, site supervisor, Southold Landfill, and Paul Bauer, NUS Corporation,Region 2 FIT, March 27, 1991. 42. Telecon Note: Conversation between Claire Clew, Tax Assessor, Town of South, and David Florin, NUS Corporation,Region 2 FIT,September 27, 1990. r 1 I I � wE.EaE��E .o. , Ali .:_ ,.. . New ork 5ate�Department of Environmental Conservation • •-‘1:...," i!� 44d! ' }' S Og}. BRGDX, IWY 11794 - 'S'., • 11 ' • 7." •,. • Peter-A. A. Berle, commissioner.. .: '''4?••.•,--.- c,,r„;:.4(141..... .... ,,,,,,•.„..;.4itt,,.. 7.2.-ii;,,ti..,„:_,.., ,, t .. , . .. , • _ . . , July 18,. 1976. ' ;.• .. ; =+.err.t):4';:-.14% Mr:•Raymond Deans `•''' ''1►„ , *seri ,�. ��, f . t` Suparintiende t of',Highways 4,...:.,...04. -.4''. -t•-.;' , } y7 1 ,.u. `OWl1;0, �$OLl. Q}d �;'•• ' •,4;w ,� . .xc PI `- • : dI ;� Main tto ad$.i. �� ►, • . ;, !� w n :. r •,: Southold,: New' stork ;1197 +-4 •) t. •SttL ,,.w` tear Mr. Dean: . After inspect+o:. c= your sanitary landfill, the following violatio��s were observed: IF; 4;�. 1) . Leachate at toa of southwest slope `.. 2) . Refuse protruding through completed areas. of 3) . Evidence r o�.:,..:is and insects. • .. ' ., i, . This is riot in co.n2li nce with Part360-: • and must be corrected. Vary truly yours, 1: _ ....._... ,_ - may .A± L ` �_....._... • . . , 4z.c.,...4 . • .,.,2,2A4/ -1 , "r Joseph D'Aprile-,P.E.I. .y.... JDA/ef ICC: it. Bruckman P. Grosser ":' • 1• 1 1 1 1 1 � REFERENCE NO. 1 1 1 i 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 • It DEPARTt._.-:T CF _ . -: .: '. .1":-:: • IN :RCF IC E 1 IlTo: FOR THE RECORD • Date : March 8 , 1979 1 • • From: R. Olsen IL . - Subject: Town of Southold - East End Survey Mattituck Airbase, Airway Drive , Mattituck 1J . On 2/21/79*,an Inspection at the above facility was conducted 11 - . during a spcial industrial survey of the Town of Southold. , This facility is a factory representative and rebuilder for 2 different-brands- of airplane engines . The names of these II ' company brands were not provided. This facility is also the J only local facility capable of completing major repairs on airplanes. Among the wastes produced by Mattituck Airbase are trichlor sludges and spent trichlor, drain oil, hydraulic I . oil,mineral spirits, • Cold Sol! sludges and spent_Cold Sol , Zepresto sludges, _Zyglo, and blasting residue, fuer, a odine II and discharges from Hobart Machines, (giant hot washing machines) . . __. • • . . ....--., . • - All the 'eastes , with the exception of waste crankcase oil, solvent rinses and the discharges-_from the Hobart Machines, • are disposed of at the town landfill in Cutchogue. The waste J. crankcase oil is collected by Sheridan Oil Co. The rinses , as well as the effluent from the Hobart Machines , are dis- II charged to a system of .below grade leaching pools. I . , Mr. JayWickam, operator/owner of the facility, told me that he is expanding the capacity and' capabilities of the facility. II 1 These expansions include upgrading the tool shop, construction of . a larger volume degreasing tank (already 11 completed) and I expansion of the Zyglo unit. There also appeared to be a small ' 3 plating line being constructed but this was denied by Mr. Wickam. • When I' inquired about his waste solvent production, Mr. Wickam stated that in the past it averaged more than 300 gal. per year, III • • • all of which went to the Cutchogue landfill. Mr. Wickam also complained about a recent change in practice at the landfill. . He explained that in the past he was able to unload his drums.111 .1 - at the -1-ariUfill--and then-pick-them up -floe-following-.day, =mpty.._F=- - - However, lately, he has not been getting his drums back, which;"' . has necessitated his purchasing empty drums to replace the--ones z. he leaves at the dump. . -- " - --- rLL informed Mr. Wickam that-this practice was illegal and that he I . must cease and - desist• �i;rcnediately. Mr. Wickam agreed. I left.- II 11 To : AOR . .CORD -- 2 - . _ . j , _. 79 IIaP ermit application as well as a scavenrrer list. Pe^is7ior. was also obtained to procure samples fro the leaching field. II It was estimated that between 3 and 5 , 000 gal. of liquid waste has already been deposited at the dump. This waste consists mainly of solvent sludges and spent solvents . R. Olsen I! RO/rt Att. • 1 cc: James Maloney Ii Ii 1.1 ii 1, i . . Ili . . __ _ ili ' . . . ..., . __ _ all ' . . i 1 1 � REFERENCE NO. 3 1 L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation " ''"'�= `r" I. J -- Robert r . r lackeKULKLKXXOWKKI, Commissioner April 10, - r • 11 APR _0 ;.3,1-9 Raymond D=an Town of Southold CC 41-Y Peccr c Lane tiiALIH SG,AYIC:S Peccr c, New io_".: 11953 _ 1 : TC;r'l C' SCUT:CLD T S.liD__ _ APPLICA_ICN #52-S-17 'j Dear IIr. Dean: 2'y July 23, 1970 letter to you made you aware that 55 gallon drums filled with oil should not be accepted at your landfill. A recent inspection by Steve Kramer on March 2, 1979, indicates you are accepting 55 gallon drums filled with liquid from i'attituck Airbase in your leaching lagoons, as well as, industrial waste. 11.1 The landfill is not designed as a secure landburial facility, and your 360 Application states that you will not receive such waste. 1.1Therefcre, it _s . our responsibility to immediately stop e••eth..:se wastes. `rI may be of any assistance to you, pl'eaoe nct hesitate to contact .:e at the above telephone number. y truly Very yours, .I .� Paul Lappano Asst. Sanitary :ngr. 1 PL/ef 1111 cc: Supervisor- A.M. iartocch.ia ri j Shrivas Lava, I-l7'1 . Maloney, SCDH- 1 1 1 � REFERENCE NO. 4 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 9CBERT C �CL�MACHER P E. SAMUEL C.MCLENOON P E NORMAN E .MURRELL.PE H2M Corp. tiAROLO A OCMBECK P E. i , HUGO 0 FREUDENTHAL.PP 3 II HOLZMACHER,McLENDONandMURRELL,P.C. CARL E BECKER PE. JOHN J MOLLOY P E CONSULTING ErINEERS Nh4FALT�SCIENTISTS and PLANNERS DONALD A Sloss P E ,,+ 1.��9 AC mEL.,LLE NY '1 74-,515;694.3040 C ,ARY E LOESCH P E 125 BAYL;S PL,,. VOL,LLE.NY 1174-.5161'52-9060 C BRA M SHRI A P E CHARLES E BANKS.P E II 375 FLJL'CN STPEET FAPMINGOALE.NY 1!'35'5!6)694-3410 C 2ie 6ST`I�ISTREE' PIVEFHEAO NY 11901 15161 727 3460 C February 13, 1981 TELECCPIER dex 4100;5161 752-9067 .ENTAL QUALITY I Mr. Morris Bruckman, P.E. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40, SUNY Stony Brook, New York 11794 IIRe: Town of Southold Part 360 Compliance I Report-Groundwater Monitoring 11 Dear Mr. Bruckman: On behalf of the Town of Southold, we are pleased to submit herewith our preliminary findings in connection with the ground- !' water monitoring at the Southold landfill. Our groundwater monitoring program, performed in coordination II with the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, con- sisted of obtaining samples from the three (3) existing SCDHS permanent wells (as shown in Figure 1) and analyzing the samples for the 59 constituents as required by NYSDEC. We have presented II our findings in Table 1 (6 Sheets) along with a comparison with the available New York State groundwater and primary drinking 1 water standards. Our preliminary analysis indicates presence of I leachate contamination in Well No. S-68916, located down-gradient of the landfill. As per our conversation with SCDHS, our analysis concurs with the SCDHS findings in this regard. As II indicated in Table 1, a few other constituents were also found exceeding the New York State groundwater and primary drinking water standards. IIPlease note that these findings are only preliminary and subject to further investigation and evaluation by SCDHS and H2M. We are,: at this writing, awaiting additional groundwater I II I II HOLZMACHER. McLENDON and MURRELL. P.C. / H2M CORP. I Mr. Morris Bruckman, P.E. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation February 13, 1981 Page Two sampling results from SCDHS. After we receive these data, a more conclusive evaluation along with a comparison with the SCDHS findings will be presented in our final report of March 31, 1981. We hope our submission meets the requirements of Item 2 of the conditional permit. If you have any questions, please call our office. As we discussed over the telephone, we would appreciate your expediting issuance of the landfill permit to the Town of Southold. Very truly yours, IHOLZMACHER, McLENDON & MURRELL, P .C. i�'4�� 1 Brij M. Shrivastava, P.E. BMS/lma enc. cc: Supervisor William Pell, III - w/enc. Superintendent Raymond Dean - w/enc. 1! Joseph Baier, P.E. , SCDHS - w/enc. 1 I I OM i - r MS OM - MI - OM MO - - I r OM i r I. , FIGURE 3-� - ;A\ ----'--- r" , , !r_ �� • _ '1 J -693 , \ ��ir ,r / / / S-689/r60�� i/ /� \\ / millm s si t �/ \�\ ,/ o .-\ _. \ / I i ` A 1 ,:l •?"1 : .7 I .*.'...., .••• .11" 4:. , A ." ), 1),/ef • Ad / A \' •..'LtLi. 1n a . :. J\ \ \ /• I i' SCALE: I"• 200' iss?CI •\•• \ \ /// • II �� '.• �l// r� / S. CONTOUR INTERVALS II r ., \ II L H1'rf r. • .. I `\ V' \ \ 4\ // ..• . .r' :r \ Imo. \ \ /, 1 14 • GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS \ \ // ..a AT SOUTHOLD LANDFILL AA.. lig• '• TOWN OF SOUTHOLD • PART 360 COMPUANCE REPORT hrVl•bI.M• HOLZMACHER,MQLENOON i MURRELL.P.C./H2M CORP. 1.~400,..11••• COIaILT1460/0.E016.PLANNERS ENVIRCHMENTAL SCENTOTS wMwII.o••• I 3.6 E 1 - a■1 1 r a i - - - a r - - r - - NS "UMHOIZMACNER.MCLENOOR a MURRELL►.0 ` I ■ r TABLE 3-2 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD '�'�._ .• - LANDFILL LEACHATE MONITORING SAMPLING RESULTS (ALL RESULTS ARE IN mg/1 UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE) l (Sheet 1 Of 6) . H2M RESULTS SUFFOLK COUNTY D.H.S. RESULTS WELL NUMBER 1-69761 S-68831 S-68916 5-69761 S-68831 S-68916 m r • 0 m • SEPT . SEPT. SEPT. H2M 112M 1 t n n L 1980 1980 10 NEW YORK STATE RESULTS NEW YORK STATE RESULTS DATE AND ` o n 1980 GROUNDWATER EXCEEDS PRIMARY DRINKING EXCEEDS ` DEPTH OF SAMPLEr o H o ?§+ ��'+ +'v]' N 8 n 100 FT. 200 FT. 102 FT. STANDARDS YES/NO WATER STANDARDS (b) YES/NO • Chloride 35.5 16.0 40.0 37.0 12.0 248 250 NO Hes. Chromium <0.02 <O.02 <0.02 0.05 NO 0.05 NO Cyanide (ug/1) <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 200 NO Fluoride <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 1.50 NO 1.50 NO Deters. (MBAS) <0.04 <0.04 0.08 0.50 NO Nitrate (NO3-N) 11.0 0.20 <0.10 9.7 .02 .03 10.0 YES1 10.0 YES1 ;t.p . P.,.....-',..,, - Phenols (ug/1) <1.60 4.00 2.00 1.0 YES 3titi . -f, l Sulfate 38.4 1.28 210 7.0 218 250 NO3 ''-.",--7,'^.--.77:-. ..-:-.--:.- pH 6.3 7.50 7.00 8.5 7.2 6.5 - 8.5 YES ` n . `^, .j Spec. Cond. }+s..f,;;,.• ` • (ushos/cs) 340 220 2,300 240 1950 sal#awl, z� ^•� Ansonia (NH3-PO <0.02 0.02 40.0 .09 .19 46 Total Diss. 4 . ~•' --'."''''' t.. .' ' Solids (TDS) 218 136 1,429 ., ''s'rt� , dna7L ' ',j ri??' •1r :''r Total Organic ai;.J •0:::'-c'" • - Carbon (TOC) 2.9 1.0 8.6 Arsenic ug/1 <2.00 2.00 <2.00 20.08 25.0 NO 50.0 NO 'lrpP3.7 MI 11111 11111 - 111111 - gill MI MI - gill Ill. 1/1 111111 111111 1111111 MS all _ - ,..._______ ,, A, git•Lf"-( •,1 ftik's• '•' 12*i ROLZMACHER McLENOON a MURRELL.PC ,----,e_ _____,...-1 TABLE .-2 '' ( $ ' ' 014.,• - row OF SOUTHOLD • ,'• ,, • , .( LANDFILL LEACHATE MONITORING4- SAMPLING RESULTS 'r, . 4, (ALL RESULTS ARE IN me/1 UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE) s tacmyar,pjumoi;.1,4•AINPAKIEHNOIM419000/0 14 4 su (Sheet 2 Of 6) 525 RESLLTS SUFFOLK COUNTY D.H.S. RESULTS 9 r ., WELL HUMID S-69761 S-68831 S-68916 3-69761 S-68831 S-68916 . et 0 0 0 AUG. AUG. so • 0 • so •7.2 20 20 525 1980 1980 Ni Ton STATE RESULTS NEW TOIL STATE • .'' DATE AND stig .....2. ev ca GROUNDWATER EXCEEDS PRIMARY DRINKING •-•, DEFT! OF SAMPLE --.. :: ' -.:4 STAND/MIS YES/NO WATER STANDARDS.•:N/' .,„, ...., -,••, Barium (0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <.2 1.0 NO 1.0 1 '15" 10' 4/$111#0334.00.0VISM11010F014"$S4,0 Cadmium (ugh 1) <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <2.0 10.0 NO 10.0 Copper <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 .13 1.0 NO 1it ' - ' Iron <0.02 0.02 0.06 <.05 .32 0.3 NO ,, I ' , . 1.#v• . . Lead (us/1) <2.00 3.50 4.00 <10.0 25.0 NO 25.0 /11 •I , . - Mine <0.02 0.07 25.2 .07 213.3 0.3 YES4 .., • . Mercury (us/l) <0.50 <0.50 0.SO NOT AVAILAALE 2.0 NO 2.0 NO 3 Selenium (ughl) <2.00 <2.00 14.0 40.0 20.0 NO 10.0 YES Oriollit".1114"‘" Zinc 0.21 0.03 0.05 .5 5.0 NO '44P:::.:"2.:**'' .- : ': Silver <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <.01 0.05 NO 0.05 NO '' # [ -''.:.-t!.:',! ,..Ark 1•3,f.,,ks'-',1.:Vi:S.;.:!;.?: 1 Chromium <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <.01 0.05 NO . ., , . .• .4 i r--f-''''IA".t"..,-.... .......... '...,.' , I .• t', 11' '::-.`-k: .1.'"";-'r r,. ...•;.....-44:`7,:i.4.:•"`:••;:'' r ,. ,7-gi-..-1`--;:.,',',..I• .. ". .'- 4 f 4 . At#4' ,-- _...,. Ck,..;-• tr...1%1.4.4. . : , S. ':‘ .1L''t•- l'14.1:: 3t.;..".2:ii1:: ::';.44 4 •, .', _1,.,„ ,•,---;s,_;,,,-,•-,,I,-t„,•4 .•• '''',.. 0%1;7'4.;.• ••••.,,.....554., \ * • r ‘,11 • •••'-sr-so ' :4 - .. if. , •- ' ' .7""01?-1,... :.0,1Frit- 'ki _ 4 '.,- < ,4 4,:i44•47g.' . , li•I lit: , •..,, 1.:.--.4'.'•••' .' - '- i I ° ( ; ti• A:-. -, , • . 4 ,,,., ., .1,.. 38 0 1 ' 4 ,. , '.... "; t' 1 4 , -le r. # . ,' ' 1 , Aso, ----'' ` t V4 4# 1 8 1111. r r 115111 NI 111111 ill 11111 NB i 11111•1 vim Ila 1111111 IIIII all gill ,.......;••: ■rL 4t MOIIMACNER.McLENDON(MURRELL P C TABLE 3-2 ' - / TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LANDFILL LEACHATE MONITORING SAMPLING RESULTS (ALL RESULTS ARE IN ng/1 UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE) 1 =s (Sheet 3 Of 6) *! N2M RESULTS SUFFOLK COUNTY D.N.S. RESULTS WELL NUMBER 5-69761 S-68831 S-68916 S-69761 S-68831 S-68916 J o o o 112M H2M N :+ n C.no . NEW YORX STATE RESULTS NEW YORK STATE RESULTS i DATE AND S ;g « GROUNDWATER EXCEEDS PRIMARY D[1NXING EXCEEDS r DEPTH OF SAMPLE -.. -C. .o STANDARDS YES/NO WATER STANDARDS TES/NO r - Pesticide (u[/1) ALL VALUES ARE LESS THAN Lindane .03 .03 .03 ND 4.0 x ..• .. Heptachlor .03 .03 .03 ND Aldrin .03 .03 .03 ND • Hepthachlor- Epoxide .03 .03 .03 - Dieldrin .05 .05 .05 ND Endrin .10 .10 .10 ND .2 NO ' .. _4 ** 0, P' DDT .15 .15 .15 NOT AVAI ABLE P. P' DDT .20 ' .20 .20 •.v -,:L, .. - Methoxychlor 1.0 1.0 1.0 35.0 NO 100,0NO }v« '''',;*` -7,'.",....... Toxaphene 2.5 2:5 2.5 ND 5.0 NO r art-- • Chlordane .50 .so .SO •1 YES6 I. .may fKP - _ _ _ - _ _ ... -. -'t y. -s,...,-i.7 . ,. \ " ,, J ? .. .I r..-. lr -,ems r - N 1 - ON 1 N - r - r N - - - r S E 1-12/414 NOLZMACHER•McLENDON I MURRELL O C TABLE 3-2 • TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LANDFILL LEACHATE MONITORING • Ng 011P'4 - SAMPLING RESULTS (ALL RESULTS ARE IN mg/1 UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE) (Sheet 4 Of 6) H2N RESULTS SUFFOLK COUNTY D.H.S. RESULTS WELL NUMBER 5-69761 5-68831 5-68916 5-69761 5-68831 S-68916 o • o e • AUG. H2H H2N 'es.t r C n Ir.t. 20 NEW YORK STATE RESULTS NEW YORK STATE RESULTS DATE AND g g r N 1980 GROUNDWATER EXCEEDS PRIMARY DRINKING EXCEEDS O DEPTH OF SAMPLE - _ ^- - STANDARDS YES/NO WATER STANDARDS YES/NO ;,- +a• yq :yy :B4-.4grw.k.'3: ug Halogenated ( /1) ALL VALUES ARE LESS THAN YES7 1. 1 1 2 2. ,0 1 1 S w 3. o (1) 1 5 • :I}* ! 1 1 5 5 6. _ ej 1 1 5 NOT A V A I L A BLS' <5.0 100 NO F. 7•'j* U O z w ,1 1 (160) <4.0 }t B. v Z 1 1 --- igY'r ' 9. c la 1 1 1 <2.0 ND s ..� 10. wp o 1 1 --- <1.0 5.0 NO ai N M rN.T�x.,-�1�:-.:- 11. 8 a 1 1 2 <3.0 ♦u , i '� . 3.10 1111111 all 11111 111111 all 1111 11111 Ell 11111 VIM 11111 11111 all all VIII 111111 ism Thr I',. . . .C.1. r • f - - 111244 MOLZMACMEN•MoLEMOON a MURRELL P C h l.. I r ' TABLE 3-2 • TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 4. • LANDFILL LEACNATE MONITORING ; ' 0440000401W,4, y0._p SAMPLING RESULTS h . (ALL RESULTS ARE IN es/1 UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE) + (mist S 0! 6) N2N RESULTS SUFFOLK COUNTY D.N.S. RESULTS • • WELL NUMBER S-69761• , S-68831 5-68916 S-69761 S-68831 5-68916 • AUG. - e e o - at • 20 N2N H2N N t M t N t 1980 NEW TORE STATE RESULTS NEW TORE STATE RESULTS oi DATE AND r.8 74. g 00 GROUNDWATER EXCEEDS PRIMARY DRINKING EXCEEDS DEPTH OF SAMPLE .r 102 FT. STANDARDS YES/NO WATER STANDARDS TES/NO 1 HaloSenated (uR/l) • 12.1 1 1 2• } 13.Ji* Id 1 1 2 I !` : , • 14. 1 1 2 r I 0 15. 1 1 2 10.0 NO • • �y�y�� 16. [m 1 1 2 1 141066110111.°61040.415 17. <20 a 1 1 2 NOT AVAILABLE 18. s m 1 r 1 2 I L oa � 019.1* a 1 1 2 " c N Z N ' 20. @ 1 1 2 , r 1. 1..t.:-... -,—',.' C J _ . �a ee"i 21.1* R i 1 1 2 <2.0 ,chi yr/.;,�'b _, r,az..Y�,t •� 22. 9 1 1 2 ] Oki,V4 K`% 23. 1 \ 1 2 S.0 No r-.•,,,,4.,l.r"C7e� C s<,� i r sr•- •,. � �: -i- � -" 24. 1 1 2 sY. ,.,•• � .1.P "♦Kte rr G•t . SII 3.11 ail 8111 111111 11111111BM ue....-- on 111112 urn ill 111111 IIIIII MN . r I 4 N 'M - ;=�•- ' ■ 244 NOLZMACNER,McLENOON E HUBBELL P C { 1 , TABLE 3-2 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -le, l__....---", LANDFILL LEACHATE MONITORING SAMPLING RESULTS (SHEET 6 OF 6) **NOTES** r4•!n61'> °: ''M1tiAy 9' VOLATILE HALOGENATED NOTES: °1: ?+1* `'`r 1. methylene chloride 2. 1,1-dichloroethylene 1. Both N.Y.S. groundwater and primary drinking water standards 3. 1,1-dichloroethene exceeded in Well No. S-69761. 4. trans-1,2-dichloroethylene 2. N.Y.S.goundvater standards exceeded in Wells S-68831 and 5. cis-I.2-dichloroethylene S-68916. 6. chloroform 3. N.C.S. groundwater standards violated in Well No. S-69761. 7. 1,1,2-trichlorotrifluoroethane 4. N.Y.S. groundwater and secondary drinking water standards exceeds 8. 1,2-dichloroethane in Well No. S-68916. 9. 1,1,1-trichloroethane 5. N.Y.S. primary drinking water standards exceeded in Well No. 1 10. carbon tetrachloride S-68916. 11. bromodichloromethane 6. Groundwater standards possibly exceeded in all velli tested. 12. 1,2-dichloropropsoe Uncertain because standard was below 02M's limit of detection. 13. 2,3-dichtaropropene 7. Well No. S-68916 exceeds N.Y.S. primary drinking water standards 3L= ,'} " 0�.3 14. trans-1,3-dichloropropene as a total category (Volatile Halogenated). The sum of the ; '` s?arb!. 15. trichloroethylene individual constituent concentration cannot exceed 100 ughl. 16. 1,1,2-trichloroethane 8. Sample taken on 8/20/80. Results from prior analysis. 17. chlorodibromomethene ND Not Detectable as per section 703.4 of N.Y.S. Groundwater 18. cis-1,3-dichloropropene Classification Part 703. 19. bronoform * Report value represents total. 20. 1,1.1,2-tetrachloroethane () Values depicted in parenthesis are actual values. Not less than 21. tetrachloroethylene ( ) quantities. 22. 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane GROUNDWATER TABLE ELEVATIONS RECORDED BY - • 23. vinyl chloride N2M ON 12-22-80 24. chlorobensene Approx. FF�T Approx. Ground Groundwater Well No. Depth to GroJadjater Elevation (Ft.) Table gloved,* 5-69161 39 42.5 3.5 S-68831 49 52 4.0 jar �,r.,^!;` ' , 3-68916 49 52 4.0 I 4 ' :'7-60.tl • • 4__,,..,„ 'le '1'-• 1-....:,- -'.7::*X-'-i'':'''l':'-: .i i 3.12 i. � REFERENCE NO. 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .N` 41111 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation ' ii1Jiny 40, SONY, Stony Brook, NY 11794 =16) 751-7900 HenryG.Williams Commissioner August 4, 1983 Mr. William Pell III, Supervisor Town of Southold Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 RE: LANDFILL Dear Supervisor Pell: Two recent inspections of the Town landfill indicate some improvement in _ the site appeaziance. Some grading has been performed, paper bales were removed, and the gas venting trench extended. Many of the problems brought to your attention over the past few months ' remain, including: . Uncovered refuse . Lack of daily cover . Uncontrolled dumping . No groundwater quality data . Analysis of septage indicates high concentration of heavy metals The Town should: . Control dumping to one manageable area Submit water quality data . Place an individual in charge of the site with responsibility and authority . Improve landfill equipment . Decide on an operational plan, formalize and implement it . Consider the sale of land gas rights. ' The Department offers its assistance in any of these areas. Improvements have to be made to the site or legal action will be considered. Very truly yours, JAMES H. HEIL, P.E. Regional Solid Waste Engineer JHH:ebp cc: H. Berger, A. Machlin, J. Maloney, R. Dean i 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 i 1 REFERENCE NO. 6 1 1 1 1 Asik"yew York State Department of Environmental Conservation 40, SUNY, Stony 3rook, NY 11794 -71-7900 Henry G.Williams Commissioner August 25, 1983 Wr. William Pell III, Supervisor Town of Southold Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 ' Re: Landfill Dear Supervisor Pell: An inspection of the landfill was made at 7:10 a.m. on August 25, 1983. The inspection indicated more progress towards covering of the refuse; however, at the time of the inspection: 1. the refuse truck dumping area east slope had not been covered from the ' previous day; 2. dumping is not controlled; 3. ponding of water existed on the north end of the site; 4. no Town employees were evident during the twenty minute inspection; S. there were many pesticide containers (Manex, Theodain, Vydate L) in three locations at the site. Results of groundwater monitoring have not been submitted as required and agreed to by the Town. The fill seems to be moving towards the east. Further expansion in this direction will require the installation of a liner. Very truly yours, 1 14. )1.16,.,c 1-4,670 JAMES H. HEIL, P.E. Regional Solid Waste Engineer ' JHH:ebp cc: H. Berger J. Maloney i i I 1 I I REFERENCE NO. 7 1 I A I I ENGINEERING INVESTIGATIONS AT INACTIVE HAZAiRDOUS :'ASTE SITES IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK PHASE I INVESTIGATIONS SOUTHOLD LANDFILL ' TOWN OF CUTCHOGUE SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK NYSDEC SITE NO. 152062 Prepared for: Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12233 1 Prepared by: ' WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS, INC. 1250 Broadway, 15th Floor . New York, New York 10001 December 1985 82C4548-3 1 ITABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NO. .0 JARRATIVE SUMMARY 1 -1 2.0 J.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DOCUMENTATION 2-I I2.1 Preliminary HRS Work Sheets 2-2 2.2 Documentation Records For HRS 2-10 I 2.3 EPA Form 2070-12 2-29 2.4 EPA Form 2070-13 2-34 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 3-I I �.0 SITE DATA 4-I I 4.1 Site Area Surface Featuresi-I 4.2 Site Hydrogeology '+-1 I 4.2.1 Ground-Water Occurrence 4-I 4.2.2 Ground-Water Quality 4-2 4.2.3 Ground-Water Use 4-2 1 4.3 Past Sampling and Analysis 4-3 5.0 DATA ADEQUACY 5-I I6.0 WORK PLAN 6-I 6.1 Objectives 6-I I6.2 Field Investigation Plan 6-I 6.2.1 Preliminary Site Investigations 6-I I 6.2.2 Geophysical Studies 6-2 6.2.3 Monitoring Wells 6-2 I 6.2.3.1 Installation 6-2 6.2.3.2 Water Elevations 6-3 6.2.3.3 Aquifer Testing 6-4 1 6.2.4 Sampling and Analysis Plan 6-4 6.2.4.1 General Plan 6-4 I 6.2.4.2 Sampling Parameters 6-4 6.2.4.3 Sampling Locations 6-4 I 6.3 Health and Safety Plan 6-5 6.4 Report Preparation 6-5 6.5 Cost Estimate 6-6 I IE281 /227B i I I ILIST OF TABLES 1 TABLE NUMBER TITLE II SOURCES OF INFORMATION I2 PROPOSED CHEMICAL ANALYSES 3 ESTIMATED COSTS FOR PHASE II INVESTIGATION I I LIST OF FIGURES I FIGURE INUMBER TITLE I SITE LOCATION MAP I2 LOCATION PLAN FOR PROPOSED PHASE II INVESTIGATION I I I 1 I I E281/227B ii I ' APPENDICES IAPPENDIX TITLE IA REFERENCES B SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION C UPDATED NEW YORK STATE REGISTRY FORM I I I I I i i i I I I I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I IThe Southold Landfill is located in the town of Cutchogue, Suffolk County, New York (Figure I). The Southold Landfill is located in a predominately agricultural zone. The facility has been operating continuously at the North Road site since 1951. This facility accepts municipal and domestic wastes, demolition and landscaping Idebris, and cesspool and septic tank wastes. Of major concern is the ground water. Some ground-water deterioration has already been noted within this area. Additional IIdata is needed to determine the current status of the ground water quality there and in its vicinity. 1 The Phase I effort for the Southold Landfill included: collection and review of Iexisting data; preparation of a preliminary Hazard Ranking Score (HRS) for the site; conducting a site investigation/responsible parties interview; development of a preliminary hydrogeologic model; completion of required documentation; development Iof a work plan and estimated costs for further investigations at the site, and preparation of a summary report. I The preliminaryHRS scores developed for the Southhold Landfill (NYSDEC Site P 111 No. 152062) are as follows: SM = 37.99 (Sgw = 65.62 Ssw = 3.72 Sa = 0) SFE = N/A SDC = 12.50 I The data available were somewhat adequate to prepare a final HRS score, although Iinformation concerning the quantity of the waste was unknown. The existence of hazardous substances is verified by the presence of hazardous compounds within leachate emanating from the landfill. II E281 /2278 I I I The Phase 11 Work Plan developed for the Southold Landfill is specifically designed gned Ito address questions concerning soil, ground water and air quality so that a final HRS score and conceptual remedial designs and estimated costs can be developed. We have proposed a limited geophysical survey, the installation of four monitoring wells, ground Iwater, leachate, and soil sampling and air monitoring. A detailed description of the work plan and estimated costs is provided in Section 6.0. I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 7281/2278 2 I 02, I 6 _ '\-,,i1). -- • _ , _____ • Duck Ppnd �' .�� • Point -•- - - / %• . � iY�. .. 'tea =3 �- /6J _•� A,Q OC - _ .J7 i�Sounq �} ,,a \ '/ .� O - „."N•, ' • • (->.. \ 56� a - � _-le a..4,- 16 � / /. - '''-4- �f•,„, '•' erO�'Q�. �.•• '•‘4,4 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL SITE 1 , ' s a \ 6'• ".• zs p V 5 . ,Cutchogue Sta 'o, `�:, cuoe� • \ - • 9M: • /A '- \ '- G• • • M Sacred eart Cern ,, 'a•' Z.,),, •-• •, s .• , _:. .- • • • \ r •Ss -••., - Cutchogue 5) -No _\-- '0 .. ,.._.::; • • • ' \d ` `' -- • , • ..>R . COORDINATES MAP SOURCE: o 2000 4000 FT LAT. 41°01'41" USGS MAPS MATTI TUCK HILLS AND SOUTHOLD 1 SCALE LONG. 72°30'00" QUADRANGLES NEW YORK—SUFFOLK CO. 7.5 MINUTE SERIES 1956 MJ,pOP.MFtir, ...a,r•dse ••We SOUTHOLD LANDFILL SITE NEM,TOPA STATE PHASE I INVESTIGATION rk DEPAPITMENT OF ENVIRONMENTA CO .ENv6TION SITE LOCATION MAP 1: SO ecus qua, 4bnv 'rw va• t 133 _ z w •�iS n New, G "°"""" `°""A" WOODWARD—CLYDE•CONSULTANTS. INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS.GEOLOGISTS ANO f NvMONNENTAL SCIENTISTS yE ? I w YORK r•t ti. ot Soke One wSOS *OMaw.•Wa Y.;7-.,--,-./.4:.:`t:' Pao w No•wm,uc•.P 'OA /T BTD SCALE. AS SHOWN PPOJ NO 82C4548-3 o�t O..atso. NEW TOUR NEW T0111[ Clt D Illr DM OTE 23 JAN 1985 slG no 1 i I I 1.0 INARRATIVE SUMMARY IThe Southold Landfill has been operating continuously since 1951 at North Road I in Cutchogue, New York. The site is located in the northeast part of Long Island, in Suffolk County, and is about 50 feet above mean sea level (USGS, 1956). The entire site covers an area of 41 acres, however, the active landfill area is only 20 acres. IIIThe site is situated in a predominantly agricultural zone. IThe Southold Landfill is owned and operated by the Town of Southold. This facility accepts municipal and domestic wastes, demolition and landscaping debris, and Icesspool and septic tank wastes. ` The Cutchogue Harbor and the Long Island Sound are within 3 miles of the site. I No wetlands or critical wildlife habitats are located within this radius. IThe potential exists for ground-water contamination, the sole source of drinking water in this area, by a suspected leachate plume emanating from the landfill and/or Iby agricultural practices in the area. Some ground-water deterioration has already been noted within this area (SCDHS, 1982; ERCO, 1981). Over 10,000 people within a I3-mile radius of the site rely on ground water as a source of drinking water. The Order on Consent dated May 16, 1979, outlined landfill operation violations Iof part 360 of 6 NYCRR. On August 31, 1981, the landfill was classified as an open dump. I 1 a I E281 .1 /227E3 1-I 1 4 I I I 2.0 IU.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DOCUMENTATION IThis section includes documentation records and work sheets required to develop Hazard Ranking System (HRS) scores. In addition, two EPA forms regarding site 1 inspection and preliminary assessment have been completed and are included as required. 1 Documents included in this section are: I I. Preliminary Hazard Ranking System (HRS) Work Sheets 2. Documentation Records for HRS 3. EPA Form 2070-12 (Preliminary Assessment) 4. EPA Form 2070-13 (Site Inspection Report) IForms were prepared as completely as possible using information available from private, county, state and federal agency sources. Values assigned to HRS rating factors Iare designated with a circle or a square reflecting complete or incomplete data, respectively. The Suffolk County Department of Health Services files and the I Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Inc. Site Survey provided the most complete site specific data. Information provided in the Documentation Records for HRS are referenced and copies of most references are included in Appendix B. Agencies contacted for Iinformation on the site are listed in Table I. I I 1 I I E281.2/227B 2-I 15 1 8 is Duck Pond ��'..-4---"---; �+ 1 •6 Point _, •; J-60 iirate;;;...korm....z,... . ' ,,.: -• NS)':1‹:. • 0 N. i -,./45021211 _ C / ' ° p • s �\ a•' SOUTHOLD LANDFILL SITE �\ I of \..mJ �� _ y. •• - _ 'fir 1 3s_ t'—' .'••‘•,...\ - o°^ •O SSS _ - j / -- `-,, a J• • p I' ti •'V\ . . , Cuttbog'LleSti �.`-�_ EI�G� •e \ / ' `, V EM• - . / 4 > /NI• , . r \ 10 Secrets Jieart - o• • Cern ,� \ U' I . l \ \ .. • • 0 6. • •b. ( s- \ ..-- : \!... t . 1\ i+ Cutch0 '•r/ " _ ., '. \, •, y- ' .1 �; EM 32• �., • •—zoo T; • V 1. • ,, —�•` �,1... \�!^� - , _ fin. COORDINATES MAP SOURCE: 2000 4000 FT LAT. 41°01'41•• USGS MAPS MATTITUCK HILLS AND SOUTHOLD SCALE LONG. 72°30.00" QUADRANGLES NEW YORK—SUFFOLK CO. 7.5 MINUTE SERIES 1856 111,10••4••••,,, P•••••••le. ei�' SOUTHOLD LANDFILL SITE ,< MEW.OIIR SLATE ,, � PHASE I INVESTIGATION .....>-,,.; ; ,CZ) DEPARTMENT OF ENVt110NMENTAI CONSERVATION SITE LOCATION MAP <Y:i"3y�.'+,','C ri^•;.. y� SO*t'Ro•e.*16 .,.s vo.a 177]3 h� Memo 6 •Wu.any.Cewvnw.,.,r, Iaer•M Ow o WOOOWARD--CLYDE CONSULTANTS. INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS.GEOLOGISTS ANO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS .. M1 .. d D.00n or Soho snot wrreew*am NEW TORN.NEM TORII � - .. >.:,;:' • "``t�, r+rmaw N Ne�se„a�,P 0R ST BTD SCALE AS SHOWN MOJ NO 82C4548-3 t0' - v011e s °" C ' e• ,, ['D C .PT' DM DATE 23 JAN 1985 no so 1 / I 1 Preliminary Hazard Ranking System (HRS) Work Sheets I I I I 1 i I I 1 1 E281 .2/227B 2-2 I I Facaky nntr: Southold T andfl.) 1 )11P EPA Ragron: I/ Fanort(a)Intl+arpeofthafstyflty: James R. Douglas, Sanitation Supervisor of Landfill Now,oR r. Michael Akerbergs pm. April 5, 1985 Gwwat dawn:loon d the ftworty: (For example: tandRM. surf impoundment. pM, oorltamar: typis d hazardous s stanw: totatton of the faotrlyts: contamination ram of myon oontyposrn; typos Of Information mamma for rating; piano, &mon. s e.) 1 The Southold Landfill has been operating continuously since 1951 at North Rd. in Cutchoque, New York. This facility accepts municipal and domestic wastes, demolition and landscaping debris, 1/ and cesspool and septic tank wastes. Of maior concern is the ground water. Some ground water deterioration has already been noted within this area. AditinnA7 Tiara is nPari ri to riprprmi np ' the current status of the ground water quality there and in its vicinity. I 37. 99 65.62 3. 72 Soorw: Sof (Sr S Si • u ) SFE N/A Six - 12.50 FIGURE 1 HRS COVER SHEET t 2-3 I I I Ground Water Route Work Sheet I Rating Factor Assigned Value Multi- Score Max. Ref. (Circle Onel pilar _ Score (Section) 0 Observed Release 0 0 1 / 45 3.1 IIf observed release is given a score of 45. proceed to line 0. If observed release is given a score of 0. proceed to line 0. I 0 Route Characteristics 3.2 Depth to Aquifer of 0 1 2 3 2 8 Comer-. I Net Precipitanor+ 0 1 2 3 I 3 Permeability of the 0 1 2 3 1 3 Unsaturated Zone Physical State 0 1 2 3 1 3 ITotal Route Charactensttcs Score 15 0 Containment 0 1 2 3 1 3 3.3 1 0 Waste Characteristics 3.4 Toxicity/Persistence 0 3 6 9 12 15 1 1 /2 18 I Hazardous Waste 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 8 Quantity I Total Waste Characteristics Score /7 26 © Targets 3.5 Ground Water Use 0 1 2 0 3 9 Distance to Nearest 1 0 4 6 8 10 1 .. r— 40 I Well/Population 12 16 18 Served 24 30 32 g 40 I Total Targets Score ;i14.4'.. 19 , I ® If line 01 is 45. multiply 01 0 OS x x If line CI is 0. multiply 0 x 0 x 0 x 50 :4'L,;-) 57,330 I 0 Divide line © by 57.330 and multiply by 100 S g w t. to c" (D a J - • FIGURE 2 IGROUND WATER ROUTE WORK SHEET I I 9: :i..:,,I. . 1 I I Surface Water Route Work Sheet IRating Factor Assigned value Multi- Score Max. Ref. (Circle One) plier Score (Section) I0 Observed Release 0 45 1 Q 45 4.1 If observed release is given a value of 45. proceed to line 0. If observed release is given a value of 0. proceed to line 12. I0 Route Characteristics 4.2 Facility Slope and Intervening 1 2 3 1 0 3 I Terrain 1-yr. 24-hr. Rainfall 0 1 © 3 1 2 3 Distance to Nearest Surface 0 Q 2 3 2 .Z 8 Water I Physical State 0 1 2 1 3 Total Route Characteristics Score 7 15 1 0 Containment 0 1 2 © 1 3 3 4.3 Q Waste Characteristics 4.4 I Toxicity/Persistence 0 3 6 9 12 15 ® 1 /8 18 Hazardous Waste 0 2 3 4 5 8 7 8 1 8 Quantity I ' 26 0 Targets 4.5 Surface Water Use 0 1 © 3 3 6 9 I Distance to a Sensitive1 2 3 2 0 8 Environment Population Served/Distance 111 ® 4 8 8 10 1 0 40 to Water Intake 13 16 18 20 Downstream 24 30 32 35 40 Total Targets Score 6 55 0 If line Is 45, multiply Ci x 0 x © 7-,7, If line 0 is 0. multiply 02 x Q3 x 04 x 05 -"- 64.350 0 Divide line 0 by 64,350 and multiply by 100 S sw - -' 71 I FIGURE 7 SURFACE WATER ROUTE WORK SHEET I 3 - s ) 0 1 I I Air Route Work Sheet I Rating Factor Assigned Value Multi- Score Max. Ref. (Circle One) pilar Score (Section) 1 0 Observed Release 45 1 0 45 5.1 IDate and Location: ISampling Protocol: If line 1l is 0. the Sa - 0. Enter on line ❑S . If line 0 is 45, then proceed to line E2 . 0 Waste Characteristics 5.2 Reactivity and 0 1 2 3 1 3 Incompatibility Toxicity 0 1 2 3 3 9 Hazardous Waste 0 1 2 3 . 5 8 7 8 1 8 Quantity ITotal Waste Characteristics Score 20 I 0 Targets 2 5.3 Population Within 1 0 9 12 15 18 1 30 4-Mile Radius 1 24 27 30 Distance to Sensitive 0 1 2 3 2 6 I Environment Land Use 0 1 2 3 1 3 I I Total Targets Score 39 Multiply 0 x pZ x 03 35,100 I0 Divide line a0 by 35.100 and multiply by 100 S a - 0 FIGURE 9 IAIR ROUTE WORK SHEET Si ii 1 .41 . a - I Ii I I S S2 IGroundwater Route Score (Sa,N) _ ti / Surface Water Route Score (Saw) 7 Air Route Score (Sa) S + S2 + S aw W a ? _ J I 2 S: : : a Sew + Sa / 1.73 SM '7, 7 111 FIGURE 10 WORKSHEET FOR COMPUTING SM 1 • I I I I 1 I 1 - � 1 I I I Fire and Explosion Work Sheet IRating Factor Assigned Value(Circle One) I Multi- pi ulti' Score Max. Ref. pl�er Score (Section) 0 Containment 1 3 1 3 7.1 a Waste Characteristics 7.2 I Direct Evidence 0 3 1 3 Ignitabillty 0 1 2 3 1 3 Reactivity 0 1 2 3 1 3 Incompatibility 0 1 2 3 1 3 I rest5ru'us Waste 0 2 3 . 5 6 7 8 1 3 Quantity Total Waste Characteristics Score 20 A. l © Targets 7.3 Distance to Nearest 0 1 2 3 4 5 1 5 Population I Distance to Nearest 0 1 2 3 1 3 Building Distance to Sensitive 0 1 2 3 1 3 Environment l Land use 0 1 2 3 1 3 Population Within 0 1 2 3 4 5 1 5 2-Mile Radius Buildings Within 0 1 2 3 4 5 1 5 I 2-Mile Radius I I Total Targets Score 24 I0 Multiply 0 x 0 x Q 1,440 III0 Divide line 0 by 1,440 and multiply by 100 S FE " FIGURE 11 IFIRE AND EXPLOSION WORK SHEET I I �-g 13 I Direct Contact Work Sheet I Rating Factor Assigned value • Multi- Score Max. Ref. (Circle One) ;Ater Max. (Section) 0 Observed Incident () 45 1 0 45 8.1 IIf line 0 Is 45, proceed to line Q If line 01 Is 0. proceed to line DI I © Accessibility 0 01 2 3 1 / 3 8.2 © Containment 0 n 1 /LT 15 8.3 I 0 Waste Characteristics + Toxicity 0 1 2 T5 15 8.4 ® Targets 8.5 I Population Within a 0 1 2 Q 4 5 4 /2. 20 1-Mile Radius Distance to a (47 1 2 3 4 0 12 Critical Habitat I I I I ITotal Targets Score /2, 32 II ® If line Q is 45. multiply 01 x 0 x If line 10 is 0. multiply 20 x 03 x 0 x © 73) 21,600 I0 Divide line 0 by 21,600 and multiply by 100 SOC .-> FIGURE 12 I DIRECT CONTACT WORK SHEET A -9 I ?.2 Documentation Records for HRS I I I I 1E281.2/227B 2- 10 15 ' DOCUMENTATION RECORDS FOR HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM 1 INSTRUCTIONS: The purpose of these records is to provide a convenient way to prepare an auditable record of the data and documentation used to apply the Hazard Ranking System to a given facility. As briefly as possible summarize the information you used to assign the score for each factor (e.g., "Waste quantity ' = 4,230 drums plus 800 cubic yards of sludges"). The source of information should be provided for each entry and should be a bibliographic-type reference that will make the document used for a given data point easier to find. Include the location of the document and consider appending a copy of the relevant page(s) for ease in review. FACILITY NAME: Southold Landfill LOCATION: North Road, Cutchoque, New York DATE SCORED: April 5, 1985 ' PERSON SCORING: Michael Akerbergs PRIMARY SOURCE(S) OF INFORMATION (e.g., EPA region, state, FIT, etc.): ' Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Inc. ('NCCI) Site Interview and Inspection, 12/18/84 Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services (SCDHS) ' FACTORS NOT SCORED DUE TO INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION: See Section 5.0 - Data Adequacy 1 COMMENTS OR QUALIFICATIONS: E281 /227B 2-II 1 I GROUND WATER ROUTE I. OBSERVED RELEASE Contaminants detected (5 maximum): PCB 1260 Iron Manganese Copper ' Zinc (Energy Resources Company, Inc. (ERCO), 1981). Rationale for attributing the contaminants to the facility: On site well tested in 1981 (ERCO, 1981). * * * ' 2. ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS Depth to Aquifer of Concern Name/description of aquifer(s) of concern: ' Upper Glacial aquifer - undifferentiated fill deposits (Jensen, H.M. and Soren, Jr. 1974). (Figures are located in Appendix B). ' The Upper Glacial aquifer and the underlying Magothy aquifer are hydraulically connected (See Jensen and Soren figures located in Appendix B). Depth(s) from the ground surface to the highest seasonal level of the saturated zone (water table(s)) of the aquifer of concern: 42-50 ft. (NYSDEC Region I well permits, 1984a). Depth from the ground surface to the lowest point of waste disposal/storage: I 20 ft. Depth of landfill (WCCI site inspection, 1984). ' Net Precipitation Mean annual or seasonal precipitation (list months for seasonal): 46 inches (User's Manual) E281/227B 2-12 f -7 1 Mean annual lake or seasonal evaporation (list months for seasonal): 22 inches (User's Manual) Net precipitation (subtract the above figures): 17 inches 1 Permeability of Unsaturated Zone Soil type in unsaturated zone: ' Stratified fine to coarse sand and gravel (Jensen & Soren, 1 °74). Permeability associated with soil type: :rester than 10-3 cm/sec (User's Manual). Physical State Physical state of substances at time of disposal (or at present time for generated 1 gases): Solid (I) Sludge (3) (WCCI site inspection, 1984). 3. CONTAINMENT ' Containment 1 Method(s) of waste or leachate containment evaluated: Unlined lagoons Unlined landfill (WCCI site inspection, 1984; Users Manual). Method with highest score: Unlined landfill (3) (User's Manual) E281 /227B 2-13 I � 4. WASTE CHARACTERISTICS ' Toxicity and Persistence tCompounds) evaluated: PC3 1260 (18) ' Iron (18) Copper (18) Manganese (I 8) Zinc (18) Each compound is rated (3) for toxicity and (3) for persistence. (ERCO, 1 981) LcrIau-Juni with highest score: All compounds have the same score (ERCO, 1 °81). ' Hazardous Waste Quantity Total quantity of hazardous substances at the facility, excluding those with a ' containment score of 0 (Give a reasonable estimate even if quantity is above maximum): ' Unknown. Scored as I based on existence of hazardous substances of unknown quantity. Basis of estimating and/or computing waste quantity: N/A 1 S. TARGETS Ground Water Use Use(s) of aquifer(s) of concern within a 3-mile radius of the facility: Domestic drinking water supply, and agricultural use (WCCI site inspection, 1984); NYS Department of Agriculture and Markets, 1984). Distance to Nearest Well ' Location of nearest well drawing from aquifer of concern or occupied building not served by a public water supply: ' Domestic well south of site (NYSDEC Region I Well Permits). 3 wells on site presumably not for potable use (WCCI site inspection, 1984). Ground-water pumpage in area is mainly from the Upper Glacial aquifer (Jensen and Soren, 1974; see Appendix B). ' E281/227B 2-14 19 I Distance to above well or building: Domestic well - 400 ft. HYSDEC Region I Well Permits; see Appendix 'Th. Dn site wells presumably not for potable use. ' (WCC( site inspection, 1984) Population Served by Ground Water Wells Within a 3-Mile Radius Identified water-supply well(s) drawing from aquifer(s) of concern within a 3- mile radius and populations served by each: .lunicipal water supply wells are located immediately outside of the 3-mile radius (NYS Atlas of Water System Sources, 1982). Although the wells are located .:utside the 3-mile radius, parts of the community serve are ,ocated within the 3-mile radius. Drinking water within the 3-mile radius is supplied by the Captain Kidd Water Company, the Greenport Water District or private supply wells. (NYS Atlas of Water System Sources, 1982; NYSDEC Region I 'Nell Permits). Estimated population within a 3-mile radius supplied by ground water is £ ,952 people (Donnelly Marketing, 1984). Computation of land area irrigated by supply well(s) drawing from aquifer(s) of concern within a 3-mile radius, and conversion to population (1.5 people per acre): Approximately 979 acres x 1.5 = 1 ,469 people estimated from USGS (topographic quad sheets: Southold, Mattituck and Mattituck Hills). Total population served by ground water within a 3-mile radius: Approximately 6,400 people. I • 1 I I I E28112278 2-IS t SURFACE WATER ROUTE I. OBSERVED RELEASE Contaminants detected in surface water at the facility or downhill from it (5 maximum): Hone Rationale for attributing the contaminants to the facility: r 1/A ' 2. ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS Facility Slope and Intervening Terrain ' Average slope of facility in percent: ` 3"o (WCCI site inspection, 1984). Name/description of nearest downslope surface water: Long Island Sound (USGS, Mattituck Hills Quad, 1956). Average slope of terrain between facility and above-cited surface water body in percent: 3? ('NCCI site inspection, 1984; USGS, 1956). Is the facility located either totally or partially in surface water? No (WCCI site inspection, 1984; USGS, 1956). Is the facility completely surrounded by areas of higher elevation? ' PJo (WCCI site inspection, 1984; USGS, 1956). I-Year 24-Hour Rainfall in Inches 2.7 inches (User's Manual) I I F28I /227B 2-16 I I r Distance to Nearest Downslope Surface Water 0.000 feet (WCC1 site inspection, 1984, USGS Southold -)uad, 1956). Physical State of Waste See ground water route. rt • 111 3. CONTAINMENT Containment 111 Method(s) of waste or leachate containment evaluated: Landf ill (WCC site inspection, 1984). Method with highest score: ' Landfill (3) (User's Manual). 4. WASTE CHARACTERISTICS Toxicity and Persistence Compound(s) evaluated See ground water route. Compound po highestscore: See ground water route. Hazardous Waste Quantity Total quantity of hazardous substances at the facility, excluding those with a containment score of 0 (Give a reasonable estimate even if quantity is above maximum): See ground water route. I I E231 /227E3 2-17 I I Basis of estimating and/or computing waste quantity: See ground water route. S. TARGETS Surface Water Use Use(s) of surface water within 3 miles downstream of the hazardous substance: Fishing, recreation (WCCI, site inspection, 1984). Is there tidal influence? to (USGS, I956). Distance to a Sensitive Environment Distance to 5-acre (minimum) coastal wetland, if 2 miles or less: None (NYSDEC Region I, 1985). ' Distance to 5-acre (minimum) fresh-water wetland, if I mile or less: None (NYSDEC Region I, 1985). Distance to critical habitat of an endangered species or national wildlife refuge, if I mile or less: 1 None (NYSDEC Division of Fish and Wildlife, I 984b). Population Served by Surface Water Location(s) of water-supply intake(s) within 3 miles (free-flowing bodies) or I mile (static water bodies) downstream of the hazardous substance and population served by each intake: N/A (NYS Atlas of Community Water System Sources, 1982). rComputation of land area irrigated by above-cited intake(s) and conversion to population (1.5 people per acre): N/A I ' E281 /227B 2-18 I I Total population served: ;/A Name/description of nearest of above water bodies: 1/A Distance to above-cited intakes, measured in stream miles: N/A l I 1 I t 1 I 1 I 1 1 I E281 /227B 2-19 1 I AIR ROUTE I. OBSERVED RELEASE Contaminants detected: IHone Date and location of detection of contaminants: f 1/A Mehods used to detect the contaminants: ' Rationale for attributing the contaminants to the site: f 1/A 2. WASTE CHARACTERISTICS Reactivity and Incompatibility Most reactive compound: J/A Most incompatible pair of compounds: N/A ' Toxicity Most toxic compound: ISee ground water route. I E281 /2278 2-20 I I Hazardous Waste Quantity Total quantity of hazardous waste: See ground water route. Basis of estimating and/or computing waste quantity: See ground water route. * * 3. TARGETS Population Within 4-Mile Radius Circle radius used, give population, and indicate how determined: 0 to 4 mi 0 to I mi 0 to 1/2 mi 0 to 1/4 mi 8792 1143 (Donnelley Marketing and USGS Mattituck Hills Quad, 1954). Distance to a Sensitive Environment Distance to 5-acre (minimum) coastal wetland, if 2 miles or less: None (NYSDEC Region I, 1985). Distance to 5-acre (minimum) fresh-water wetland, if I mile or less: Hone (NYSDEC Region I, 1985). Distance to critical habitat of an endangered species, if I mile or less: None (NYSDEC Division of Fish and Wildlife, 1984b). Land Use Distance to commercial/industrial area, if I mile or less: N/A I I E281 /2278 2-21 I I r Distance to national or state park, forest, or wildlife reserve, if 2 miles or less: 1, A Distance to residential area, if 2 miles or less: 300 ft (WCCI site inspection, 1 °84). IDistance to agricultural land in production within past 5 years, if I mile or less: 200 ft. (WCCI site inspection, 1984; NYS Department of Agriculture and Markets, 1 1984). Distance to prime agricultural land in production within past 5 years, if 2 miles or less: 200 ft. (WCCI site inspection, 1984; NYS Department of Agriculture and Markets, 111 984). Is a historic or landmark site (National Register of Historical Places and National Natural Landmarks) within the view of the site? The Old House (NHL 10/15/66). Fort Corchaug Site (NHL 1 /18/74). (NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation, 1984). I I I I I I I E281 /2278 2-22 i I r r FIRE AND EXPLOSION I. CONTAINMENT Hazardous substances present: v1 ethane ('MCI site inspection, 1984; NYSDEC site inspection, Aug. 1980). Type of containment, if applicable: ' 1/A # * f 2. WASTE CHARACTERISTICS Direct Evidence Type of instrument and measurements: OVA 2-30 ppm (WCCI site inspection, 1984). Ignitability Compound used: Methane (3) (User's Manual) 1 Reactivity Most reactive compound: N/A Incompatibility Most incompatible pair of compounds: N/A 1 E281 /2278 2-23 I I * * * 1 Hazardous Waste Quantity Total quantity of hazardous substances at the facility: See ground water route. 111 Basis of estimating and/or computing waste quantity: See ground water route. * * * I • TARGETS Distance to Nearest Population 300 ft. (.VCCI site inspection, 1984). Distance to Nearest Building 300 ft. (WCCI site inspection, 1984). Distance to Sensitive Environment Distance to wetlands: None (NYSDEC Eegion I, 1985). Distance to critical habitat: None (1 IYSDEC Division of Fish and Wildlife, 1984b). Land Use Distance to commerical/industrial area, if I mile or less: Nl/A Distance to national or state park, forest, or wildlife reserve, if 2 miles or less: None (USGS, 1979). I I E28 /227B 2-24 I I I Distance to residential area, if 2 miles or less: 1 300 ft. ('NCCI site inspection, 1984). Distance to agricultural land in production within past 5 years, if I mile or less: See air route. Distance to prime agricultural land in production within past 5 years, if 2 miles or less: See air route. Is a historic or landmark site (National Register or Historic Places and National Natural Landmarks) within the �;ew ::' the site? See air route. Population Within 2-Mile Radius 2175 (Donnelley Marketing, 1984). Buildings Within 2- Mile Radius 851 (Donnelley Marketing, 1984). I I 1 I I I I E281 /227B 2-25 I 30 I I I DIRECT CONTACT I. OBSERVED INCIDENT Date, location, and pertinent details of incident: J/A * * 2. ACCESSIBILITY De.sc:ibe type of borrier(s): 1 Security guard (10 hrs/day) Fence :ontrolled entry Signs posted ('NCCI site inspection, 1984). * * * 3. CONTAINMENT Type of containment, if applicable: Lagoons (I 5) * * * 4. WASTE CHARACTERISTICS Toxicity Compounds evaluated: See ground water route. I I I E28I /227B 2-26 i I 31 I 1 Compound with highest score: See ground water route. * t • I I I/ I i i 1 11 r I i I E28I /2278 2-27 3 1. I I S. TARGETS IPopulation within one-mile radius 1143 (Donnelley Marketing, 1984). Distance to critical habitat (of endangered species) INone (NYSDEC Region I , 1984b). I I I 1 I I I I I I E281 /227B 2-28 I I 33 I I 2.3 EPA Form 2070-12 (Preliminary Assessment) I 1 I I 11 I I I I I I 1 I I E28I.2/227B 2-29 34 I POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE i.IDENTIFICATION aEPAPRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT Ny ST TE 022SLTE NUMBER PART 1 -SITE INFORMATION AND ASSESSMENT ' "et ai II.SITE NAME AND LOCATION 01 SITE NAME a.ow cow...r.a,e.ew•.w•.,•.., 02 STREET.ROUTE NO.OR SPECIFIC LOCAON/IDENTIFIEREN71FIER �o,c��, I d and�'ill TI /VOA /2 ' OJ CITY ,04 STATE/ OS 21PQCODE 06 COUNTY U07COUNniOe LONG, .�GA0Au.F.. '`l Y 1/ 35 S-t I / ft G/,//G. CODE DIST }OI COORDINATES L A DE LONGITUDE L'of-Y1'" I _2r3_o'Qo_"._ ,0 OAECTgNS TO SITE!ammo waw wr•Aio arc Ai..,leo c M / e- 25 Et -ID L}z pot fie. - Zeit 04 0 /MA,4►-`(nom /Ne� a, /2;541- o' ,( /b A-A Rte , „ii F{ ,v a40ar/40' H ,4 4 44 III.RESPONSIBLE PARTIES 01 OWNER IN are.+1 LL / 02 STREET i4rr.wa•.miry wrrrwri • 03 Cm 4 04 STATE OS ZIP CODE 06 TELEPHONE NUMBER "A /1-19/Id Ny //9s•Y (5/1.)7351-74p 07 OPERATOR(Er meow eve ewrAiAi snow a.w..1 / /� / �. 00 STREET II.Ai...aa.wry 0080000800.0•100800.0•161I /pu.)/ 1to/G1 //,1Aw 493/• P.CConi C IOI CITY 10 STATE 11 VP CODE 12 TELEPHONE NUMBER T.R.C O n i G N'/ /1935 (5/6) 76S-3/03 13 TYPE OF OWNERSHIP et ,G ..., I I O A.PRIVATE 0 B.FEDERAL: 0 C.STATE OD.COUNTVE.MUNICIPAL biome,www, 0 F.OTHER. 0 G.UNKNOWN !Seet,r, 14 OWNER/OPERATOR NOTIFICATION ON FILE Mores raw.es o I O A.RCRA 3001 DATE RECEIVED / / 0 B. CEACLA WASTE SITE 1oac, DATE RECEIVED / / C C.NONE VONTM DAY YEAR VONT» 0•Y YEAR IV.CHARACTERIZATION OF POTENTIAL HAZARD . I 01 ON SITE N.SPECTION BY farm r•r wry, I Jam'YES DATE /Z O f/8, T 0 A.EPA 0 B.EPA CONTRACTOR 0 C.STATE 0 OTHER CONTRACTOR O NO mown* a. YEAR 0 E.LOCAL.HEALTH OFFICIAL 0 F.OTHER: CONTRACTORNAMEIS) wood c...+vd- I L 102 SITE STATUS,CnNtawow 03 YEARS OF OPERATION I ,KA.ACTIVE O B.INACTIVE O C.UNKNOWN X95/ 1 P 0 UNKNOWN INOMPO.G TEM EWING YEAR 04 S/CRIPTION OF SUBSTANCES POSSIBLY PRESENT.KNOWN.eOR ALLEGED ) j f� `' f�L ,lAZ&cisat�. 60frt n� 1rO/7I (�49 Sia GAG/ (+M.IIAY 4JAI/ty ) t ilA0 IJf[Nt'I is , OS DESCRIPTION OF Pp7ENTIAL HAZARD TO ENVIRONMENT ANOAOII POPULATION II A IwJia.t L„-.R.. .e.fril4/.cfiri1/AAp /• 744 thf-s-4--- /ptit ✓%ui� of / ,o; .� V.PRIORITY ASSESS T " 01 PRIORITY FOR INSPECTION rows am•ayw e••1r.• •rrw.owr..r M 1•Maim Maar a i m 0 me M S•Oe rMr.r Ai•rrmmi.C.wmrr w..arr.N, O A.HIGH tie.MEDIUM O C.LOW O D.NONE IM.,r•.re•••r...•to I•a•seew Aiwa ~Da w w~MO SNOW Me 1re.r r•i,.00.41111awilAi aw-N e...aww Arm II VI.INFORMATION AVAILABLE FROM 01 CONTACT 02 0►d /.444w .wrirn 03 TELEPHONE NUMBER W I I R06/1--13 Sl ik 6.144:=1,V7 iiQA-Q 15961 Lfsi-4427 04 PERSON RESPONSMLE FOR ASSESSMENT O6 a07 TELEPHONE woman 06 DATE 111 l la V �t{.o G•�/o • . H SIC. I Z°. 785-0700 Vw u. .ENI DFA FOR/2070-12 17411 I - 30 3 I I POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I.IDENTIFICATION /EPA PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT 0/1 7 STATE 02 SITE1rpir PART 2•WASTE INFORMATION �N//ff ASTE STATES.QUANTITIES,AND CHARACTERISTICS V51CAL STATES CMc...rw orrr 02 WASTE QUANTITYAT SITE 03 WASTE CHARACTERISTICS ICAs.A...0.earl ,0400044 M...N.Ya.A. A SOLID E SLURAY Saar «� XA TOXIC /ICE SOLUBLE C I IMOHLY vOLATILE I POWDER FINES '.Cf UOUID TONS J n.li.tu(...11r) 2 8 CORROSIVE _ F NFECTIOUS Z J EXPLOSNE ` ' SLUDGE _ G GAS 2.C RADK)ACTNE C G FLAMMABLE _ K REACTIVE CUBIC YARDS I LMI12.MNil ?CO PERSISTENT _N IGNITABLE : L INCOMPATIBLE D OTHER {� C M NOTAPPUCABLE SorAni NO OF DRUMS LL.l•l,"•'(RP" I. ASTE TYPE GORY SUBSTANCE NAME 01 GROSS AMOUNT 02 UNIT OF MEASURE 03 COMMENTS SLU) SLUDGE •A.0(0v ,,,t.Alkn,-cvin ACO.A.At� 0-4110-dre,„„.. L �1 '_LW) OILY WASTE ^,pvjj Cj Zl a IT at. 114,1. . n/ I OL SOLVENTS <I PSD) PESTICIDES I - (,(,.1 (W) I/ on f1E 1,4460_, —_ V "CC OTHER ORGANIC CHEMICALS ` , )C INORGANIC CHEMICALS ACO I ACIDS RAS EASES jj { 'pit /j L j- ESl f HEAVY METALS A/I..LA N d/MAI lOI JO*`i pi �P M /1411 a /•a!jl. JL r– AZARDOUSSUBSTANCES,s«Aoa«..., we..„.w,awca..CAS 1MW V ! // Q` CATEGORY 02 SUBSTANCE NAME T 03 CAS NUBER 0A STORAGE,DISPOSAL ME TNOS CONCENTRATION 06 MEASURE OF M CONCENTRATION R /zbo _ & ; 0,5/ppb I ', I '' :14 2/3.e.1---et 4-1 1 4€d , , . . _ w r- ' • ,1 I i ~ , EDSTOCKS,s«A..«...ft,us/r.w.aa ATEGORY 01 FEEDSTOCK NAME02 CAS NUMBER CATEGORY 01 FEEDSTOCK NAME 02 CAS NUMBER FDS FOS 1 FOS FOS • FOS FOS FOS FOS IIOURCES OF INFORMATION Ic..Weft..P.. .. .9 440e Hos WON diwiftwa ellP014 I Lt.)C C 2 ,/ l on, /‘9,4z • I '5,4111-0-1 ai. (.moo,••, . t' V ge.✓41 Ste) /7rw i zA/8/ , N YS DSC Lett,,, 47),x►.^ 1 5ovii b t A 1.4e4 4/l o/71 . E —. RCo , /In _ )1M2070-1217.611 � - 3J 3C i I IPOTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION 1 4A.EPA PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT 01 STATE 02 s+T 13EP PART 3-DESCRIPTION OF HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCIDENTS /V�/� U.HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCIDENTS 01 A GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION// -.i "1141)1 / 02 C OBSERVED(DATE ) POTENTIAL C ALLEGED 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED �Ile r‘4,1114 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION r�ufttIA wde.- go/bl+`ri%r /0 "C. 43044720.4-4- #. /A t. iftAa �u'/n 11:�d G4')tDNAh � �,- Abt .�79 �, � / d{ 11 (5u.gol k (o. D2pt. 04 He.4-11, S0+UI , hit- .,c, //AL 01 C 8 SURFACE WATER CONTAMINATION 02 C OBSERVED(DATE I C POTENTIAL C ALLEGED 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION I! Nli) 01 C C CONTAMINATION OF MR 02=OBSERVF0IDATE _ I C POTENTIAL = ALLEGED 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTEDii 04 NARRATIVE OESIPT1ON ,1J A R 01,, 0 FIRE/EXPLOSIVE CONOITIONS �/ wit" 02 C OBSERVED(DATE ) ,POTENTIAL _ ALLEGED 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFF`ECTED 'M/k 7�W 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION 1111 —/rte+�a� .Ga_M Con ta.� +d6M fee i 4,, h�l i (...)'(s. DEC 4 - )'i.. — hi ji1 /pits cti`-/ -cl"coO d 4 h (IuY. DEC Pic/I /nsce.G�i/) 7//o/do) 1111 01 0 E DIRECT CONTACT02 0 OBSERVED(DATE I POTENTIAL = ALLEGED 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPT10N 01 i F CONTAMINATION OF SOIL iAA" OT O OBSERVED(DATE 1 XparENTIAL = ALLEGED • 03 AREA POTENTIALLY AFFECTED f4M 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION IAQm1 19 ted d /.I►a- � 14/ ten A...,rmi rd, Lao/"/ a Z /7,404 4.,../Z„,-- co 1 „ --01 XG DRINKING WATER CONTAMINATION ll' ui_� /71” 02 G OBSERVED(DATE1111 ) x'POTENTIAr, 0 ALLEGED 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED l m1I�T4-4 �j�0-4 NARR�ATTjIVE�DESCRIPTION / / /� // / 6t/alL r-/knot)/ 7P "[. MiditGIwOr .. . 47 //LL/Z �//4/'1�,I/�44" / I! �'.a. / �. ) - mac. l44 44i1/ 01 0 H WORKER EXPOSUREANJURr02 O OBSERVED(DATE ) 0 POTENTIAL C ALLEGED 03 WORKERS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:1111 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION TION NM�/Pl 11/1 01 0 L POPULATION EXPOSURE_/P JURY 02 O OBSERVED(DATE. ) 0 POTENTIAL ALLEGED 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED 04 NARRATIVE (DATE DESCRIPTION N/A APOPKA 2070.12(741) L I -3,2- 371/ I ILPOTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE L IDENTIFICATION -/EPA PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT 0�►rr 01 >�/ � PART 3-DESCRIPTION OF HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCIDENTS �V /11;2RDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCIDENTS rem...,.., 4.41 DAMAGE TO FLORA 02*eSERVED(DATE. I ❑ POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED ♦ ARRATIVE DESCRIPTION I le_4-0-1/00) alp,h u.+� /tide" /ct2'0,,, / ni'1 Z..r . DEC �i tl/ /noted(�e K. DAMAGE TO FAUNA 02 0 OBSERVED(DATE: 1 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED EGED _WRATIVE DESCWPTION�.arrnn...ny.�...rru N/,1 iiRATTVE L. CONTAMINATION OF FOOD CHAIN 02X!OBSERVED(DATE. 1 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED DESCRIPTION / / 4 Il PO If a,'f� ACM N. tx e.., lee a i'> <.lhit.« I (N YSDEt Add ,�,.,dpe' dibite .I 'M UNSTABLE CONTAMMAENT OF WASTES 03 WI I iM el 02 O OBSERVED(DATE. ) IXPO ENTIAL 0 ALLEGED TION POTEMIILLY AFFECTED: Mil04 NARRATIVE 0E9CRIPTION ` /1 aA4 ,iep/7 A/kI j e 4' .4e a 4./ • IL.c:AMAGE TO OFFSITE PROPERTY 02❑OBSERVED(DATE: I 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED TTVE DESCRIPTION NIA )1 O.CONTAMINATION OF SEWERS.STORM DRAINS. WWTPi 02 0 OBSERVED(DATE: ) 0 POTENTIAL b ALLEGED )4 WRATTVE DESCRIPTION INJ,t , GUNAP. ILLEAL DUMPING 02 G OBSERVED(DATE. ► 0 POTENTIAL )(ALLEGED UT$ORIzED «d f l cif ss #1/.' 6/4""41 ,{� % /i rd ',At i/ ALA 4iA h IOESCRIPTICN la (nYSDEC cET7Ert To num)of Sou?otd 047U v/'./77) OF ANY OTHER KNOWN.POTENTIAL OR ALLEGED HAZAros Ivo -truck /Cadi oil o4.Iie j,. £4/f 1 (S /k 6.DHS , .0 „/N/do) ,TAL POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: /1413 (W /1614 Y ue INS ./1L 4. Oce/ y 41,4 a�R-vi" '"4 u!o/ 14,», h . occas 1 ALLAA :G�ns44c t•,J C.wi onr»e:n dria ait.l Z2)t✓$4tt of Y.+t i,A,4.79e) (3) ...ki wa. r (y) b/.iui1,� f*pv(c) 'lived" ,1 . ' URCES OF INFORMATION moo...am.I..n.e...41..w.»ewer worm.wet I c CCZ i 4ta. ,tn,o�oLc1f I96'4 a /rk G. 119t ff fk.4/17 Strv(q ,i>& invea4•vv il.ki 20741217411 Ia . 33 3(%.7 ' I I 2.4 EPA Form 2070-13 (Site Inspection Report) I I I I I I 1 1 I =281.2/227B 2-34 39 I IIL IDENTIFICATION ' POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE �E SITE INSPECTION REPORT 0)7,7[ I` a,�a�G PART i•SITE LOCATION AND INSPECTION INFORMATION / ,l' L SITE NAME AND LOCATION ol111111-14AME u�.mow.... �w+.,w aft 02 STREET,ROUTE NO OR SPECIFIC LOCATION OENTVIER e)(4,0)it,/d A4 46// ti 1€26-40( I.3 CM a STATE 05 ZIP CODE -011COUNTY o 7(::cu re N. Os Cpm-, G,)0 1 NY //935 ..-(,(7/14M. 000E asT •DOOROPIA ES 10 TYPE OF OPINE ,orm w. 4 /� o u 7f ii 0 A.PRIVATE �0 8 FEDERAL 0 C.STATE O 0.COUNTY E.111$41aPAL 3 �= 1,•— _7Z Z�. 12 Q."._ o F.OTMER o G. M.INSPECTION INFORMATION I DATE OF INSPECTION 02 WTE/STATUS 03 YEARS OF OPERATION r /2 ,/B , g,( ACT VE /9$/ J PAESE�I UNKNOWN row*« OAS YE CI INACTIVE SEG**IING YEAR ENDING YEAR 04 AGENCY PERFORMING INSPECTION,CAM;r wr , o A.EPA O 8.EPACONTN•.MOR 0 C MUNICIPAL 0 0.MUNICIPAL CONTRACTOR 0 E STATE ELF.S'iATECONTRACTOR 4d[P (.P 4z/ OG.OTHER ~~� 1ww -4 rSrGep. OS CHIEF INSPECTOR oe TTTLE 07 ORGANIZATION Oe TELEP.IONE NO 04466 /'f 05CALo 5; • 5. ‘2o` ' C e/y*`�a' a44 y�,'► i8r a7o� IIII1 Ofl1ER INSPECTORS 10 TITLE �/ ,,�ROAIIaATION I 2 TEIEPNONE No ( ► H - 113 �/SITE IEPIIE.SENTATTVES•ITERVEPIED , , 1111.1 "t 6ADOlIESS /VOD,k, ,e TELEPI•�4E No ay, ��.��� �� I5/6►7.3q-4r c�CL1^��-0 R. Dom �5,, �viSar l.f. �i,v ,NY, //9<35 Jr.I, Ed 441 J Jpo biam.e,0 F9 .m.6."4-1 -.' „., _ 1” _c ► I ► I ► • I ► A00Esi oA•ED ST --T•TIME OF•aPECTCN ' I•REAMER ODromons Ar,M slop *PERMISSION I. oo p,Al• 57.4.411 , idar," IV.INFORMATION AVAILABLE FROM ` 03 TELEPpONE NO. W► �I I a R 020E (,....,�.....,,, j" digt (5161451-'i Z7 oe PEI�ION IIESfCIN61wiscm LITE•ePECTIDN FORM � e�p 07 T1c►As1+olE NO OS DATE Z`Tr"�'.a- i 07 r--o7oa DZ 1 �2, Rr Davin Iu cillo CO/VMl t ' a/�-9�6-a87� r0w,t, OA, YEAR A PORN 20704 a(741) I a - 35 LK) I IPOTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE AENTIFICATION CEPA SITE INSPECTION REPORT 0+�sJAT� 02 7.74/74PART 2-WASTE INFORMATION - �Y Y LASTE STATES,DUANTITIES,AND CHARACTERISTICS 1 FMricAL STATES f044.4,wr 4444) 02 WASTE OUANRTV AT WTE 03 WASTE CU CTENSTICS/04.4..•44 rin p/irrr r rye ramal C.SiiIDOE r ' / AA TO= 'ge.= mu O i ...3...,►v vOL ATLE♦SOLD CE SLURRr iii,POWDER APES C�O UUO TON ��I1M6(At O SOORROSNE F INFECTIOUS O.1.ExPLOSNVE OY\S O C.RADIOACTNE O 0,.FLANINASLE 0 K.REACTIVE CUR=YARDS ' 0 FERSOTENT C H.IVRASLE C I. NCOn1PAi11LE -I.Orsi 0 M NOT APPUCA$IF !be►i NO OF man '-JASTE TYPE CATEGORY MASTANCE NAME 01(MOSS AMOUNT 02 um"OF MEASURE 03 COMMENTS LU SLUDGE ,GIA.4M (Aa W 4IoIA ,H/{oV% �j G�,Yt��j hLw OtY WASTE (14,1 /"Atin 55aJJq y 1, 1 444 PDA tt fccGA. Ai i441-4+ SOL SOLVENTS So) _ PESTICIDES Wt,k 0.0401 ...& s--y � ISCC OTHER ORGANIC CHEMICALS i IOC INORGANIC CHEMICALS CO ACIDS IAS BASES MES) HEAVY METALS (�,E,, A4E.A1 1�t y1 f by r&S4 irl Allie eta I<*cha.....c_ V."AZARDOUS SUBSTANCES(sr AA/rm r rwnalp was CAS Al/nirAg I TEOORY 02 SUSSTA$CE NAME 03 CAS►AAAER 04 STORAflE'0111OBAL METHOD OS CONCENTRATION E ip,1 , pcb /246 a9/PA i5124,... I . A I . _... ., __ . _ A . 11____. , , , __ _ , A I , 1.FEEDSTOCKS a..A1w•••r CAS wwy • a11E0011.101 FE'EDSMUMMER NA02 CAS NUII CATEOORII CH MEMO=NAME 02 CAS NUUSER FDS FOS FCB FCS 1 FOS F°5 FCS FOS /L SOURCES OF INFORMATION r. ORMATN CY rr.awr A. rso.Wm rsinge A .011~111ISucci ,,i.-,_ N;fior , /g411-/ /L Cam .pt. #.0/84 53(v7c4) '7e.rf., /z/urn. Al YSDEC ,et.Tkg, 9 . -01414,1d dz./id 4//ohs L2010.13174 1) NA I — 3.6 (.}- 1 I IPOTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE L CERTIFICATION A EPA SITE INSPECTION REPORT °' STATE °Z SITE KOMER -..4 PART 3-DESCRIPTION OF HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCIDENTS N y L MAZAl1000S CONomoN8 AND MdcOEMTS O1;�A.OAOUNDWATER COIITA ATION //(i3 }�l 02 O OBSERVED(DATE 1 xPOTEMLAL 0 ALLEGED 01POPUtAT101/POTENTWIY AFFECTED / �(�7 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION I4 / -6444, pk v to),(4a.1rh m 6,414-11 A, f I (sc DM-S 1 .�.� nil/ /v) � I 01 C B SURFACE WATER CONTAMINATION 02 C OBSERVED(DATE ) 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED I 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION N / I 1 / 01 C lvi .ON P(TENTIALLY AFFECTED L. cONTAMP ATION OF Ail 02 2 OeSERVED(DATE 1 C POTENTIAL C ALLEGED 03 n 04 NARRATIVE OESCarT10N I MA I01 X 0 FIREiEXPLOSIVE cONDmONs /143 to l T-'n/ 02 0 OBSERVED(DATE 1 POTENTIAL C ALLEGED 03'POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED /nvk 74141144 04 NAARATWE DESCRIPTION 111 lme.44._ ,� "IA b:744 ,>~",f, hl. 6t.80,-id 4/1i 4/714/2. (Nr5- c Add % se IS) III - 'iAlA IIP C; '`c-Go ,.e‘i 6ru4il (,°YSDK Pel! lhepecfio //o/iro) I01 0 E DIRECT CONTACT 02 2 OBSERVED(DATE 1 0 POTENTIAL C ALLEGED I 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION 1 Nll ` 01 F CONTAMINATION OF SOIL '' 44__ 02 G OBSERVED(DATE _ ) POTENTIAL C ALLEGED M 03 AREA POTENTIALLY AFFECTED. !► -44I.6 1 04 NAAAATTVE DESCRIPTION Mem/ ,Je,Q it.t.a4. ,»vt;2Ai- 6e_ C•edAini n /?-i/ 4.0444...._ 14-4,- - II 01G.BNKING WATER CONTAMINATION //V3 LI"/P1,3! 02 O OBSERVED(DATE 1 XPOTENTIK C ALLkGED I03 POPULAATION POTECONTAMINATIONY AFFECTED: /' u t 4I w Os NARRATIVE A- m.• c�.Q d - ...ch X_ pl44.- ipiPet 4.441 0 nAlf h f'C.04t :. •l -i�c - -pp/l ze A-1.,, A. 41444-4-4 # At. 23',r I01 0 M.WORKER 02 O OBSERVED(DATE. ) O POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED 03 WORKERS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED 04 NARRATIVE DESCRYPTION I NM 01 O L POPULATIOOPOSUREIK1URY 02 O OBSERVED(DATE ) O POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED 1 03 POPULAT10N POTENTIALLY N AFFECTED Oa NARRATIVE DESCIAIT1ON I NA EPA FOAM E010-13(741 I II POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE L EIENTIFICATION �� SITE INSPECTION REPORT '0t STATE 02 9{&7 E I PARTS•DESCRIPTION OF HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCIDENTS ilI. - \l/f- . OA.HAZARDOUS cowman AND INCIDENTS .C.....e: 0`NAPPTIVE / ADAMAGE 2j�0OBSERVED(DATE 1 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED DESORPTION f DNA- �/ a�l-f oI ,a -Ax... d-� K-411.�A,�,,.t_ wav ,--0-17.54loo C-1-- ,./ t) ,:ted +61 NYS -13 � Dec f-icld ( nSFeGlibile) I D K DAMAGE TO FAUNA 02 O OBSERVED(DATE 1 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION.......N.....rammo I NIA I1 L CONTAMG�IATION OF F000 CHAIN 02)S0BSERVED(DATE 1 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED IL NARRATIVE DE�SC I AbA11RIPTION ed Agile 4Ac 4P I 4 .. -�• . (NYsDEC / ,eII / 4Iea 4s) it .M.UNSTABLE CONTAINMENT OF WASTES //4:34(41/414 102 0 OBSERVED(DATE I OTENTIAL 0 ALLEGEDPOPULATION PO N11ALLY AFF CTED f~ /ti 04 NIAtRRATNE DESCRIPTION 7/f �4 tie/tieffiC /zh4 ,g Ariipo 4.4 C,.,.:... . 4,..i...&...,4 �II 0 N DAMAGE TO Of PROPERTY 02 0 OBSERVED(CaTE 1 O POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION I IV iii "' O 0 CONTAMINATION OF SEWERS.STORM DRAWS WWTPs 02 a OBSERVED(DATE 1 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED TL* RATNE DESCRIPTION NA LLLEGALIUNAUTI4ORRIZED DUMPING 02 O OBSERVED(DATE 1 0 POTENTIAL XALLEGED fed 55 6i.1/0r d1i..14 Jleit y hpii fro) /74./t ka( A rfa.�e_ / M/ A4 (4.40 a4 A l i f-►i A Z• 111i6-71111i4Ailuii,..c. rmy. EC LE TM( TD 13,44Q of S.wn?o.-) .1)frED 41ha/7}) 06 DESCRIPTION OF ANY OTHER KNOWN.POTENTIAL.OR ALLEGED HAZARDS Itit. 7‘-rvc4_, l00-o4 y oil oa.ii-ed (:b:i/h d / /aJ-if ( k, /fL Cp i71?-5 ) \P- '/A' 0171/0) ITOTAL POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: _ 1 w/ / 4 7444.e .COMMENTS Ste•(, 6. Deft. � /Twg# S v c -7ep/Cd '"tare fo%11°14 /(2-.)::: __ . 1 )CCR5 µ4 /4.,,, pi.) M :( ) / 4S4%( .e,v�' i/ LOl� 0/ jw.R... � fe.L , )£ � 6� 4t ;1-11-9, t/1r l?) ;wok 4 h,.At, &) blowing Eye- (r) DLII.'", 152,> 'fin SOURCES OF INFORMATION rt............r.....• N..NI.N....r... worm IW ccs 4. 49tet t 'ei14. (4. fef' Ci #.v,y '.7 63 f; ,h i ,er(f r , II FORK 2OTO,7IT41) 1 I POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE L IDENTIFICATION Ij �E SITE INSPECTION °Ny ozsr,gNyrrlpEA PART 4-PERMIT AND DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION I-) L1 iiM.PERMIT INFORMATION J1 TYPE OF PERMIT ISSUED form r...err Ar02 PERA*T NIER 03 OATS ISSUED 04 EXPIRATION OATS os oOYfNT$ O A. WOES 111 os. IIIc . o C. AIR O D. RCRA C E NCRA NTERMISTATUS 111 O F MCC PLAN )10 STATE,s...„, . n,i on bhZAZ NYS DEL.c, So I i ri ()d4k. C M LOCAL;ys,., �!$()OSA,' Pc'%- t ❑I. OTHIER,M.....r C J NONE M.SITE DESCRIFT:... i 1 STORAGE/DISPOSAL IPSO W s...►r 02 AM/0UWT 03 UNIT OF MEASURE 04 TitEAT1.ENT rQ....s.arm OS OT►1fA �A.SURFACE\iOLI1rDMENT �+�'�Ir�W 1.4-414-14411"1C A NCElERATH:IN A.BUILDINGS ON SITE o B.PILES O B UNDERGROUND MYJECTlON 0 C.DRUMS.ABOVE GROUNDIII C CMEhMCAL1PMr51CAL o D.TANK.ABOVE GROUND C D BIOLOGICAL C E.TANK.BELOW GROUNDO E.WASTE OIL PROCESSING 04 AREA OF SITE XF.LANDFILL L �^ 0 F.SOLVENT RECOVERY IO G.LMIDFARM O G.OT►ERRECYCUNG/RECOVERY �/ 4040•. O M.OPEN DUMP O N.OTHER O I.OTHER 14...,.r am..., L j /� L T COMMENTS 9I/ £i 7 �i wwa/hC1 a...1d 45,,{Gu.// ti( lN�� 4/ ,no4i TTa� 4 4'?Q 441-4.-0•,G,o� u.(-, Z. . 77 &-Q-li a ' db/ '1 co�4if t y e 4("1414r), &pesi Al iGLr-rki . .66u-toLP Pah G.,.,. + 440 if kat iv.CONTAINMENT Od.TAia.ENT OF WASTUs ..... 0 A.ADEQUATE.SECURE 0 B.MODERATE )(C.INADEQUATE.POOR O D.INSECURE.UNSOUND.DANGEROUS I OESCRITION OF GRAM.Omil1G.LIERs.SAIrERs.ETC.111 ` nn i7,eFe. ,ce /mg.,- (A,41.1.,.-(A,41.1.,.- ,C k,.,4!/1 4eplic. 4/q� a e_ r6�O m.-- - Sit> bo in£/l•.fii I g' c-L cr /.5 - 3.o P, editict_t,.0 Ifaced ie 'w rid d I.ACCESSIBILITY 01 WASTE amity AOCESSIeLE. 0 YES At IR) / asoomions fe /Ji- ,IWta : �,eulfilC (2o 4S/t,�/ 4�,•c�, 494i/led G Ais!'e d 1.SOURCES OF Tip �ie•..es�wr.n.r•..us.Nos ••••••ww>.a.a0..r U'LZ- 'i7 ,f„Iipchbn / p,71 . I A FORM 2070.13 IT.811 I - 39 ,.}.4 I 1 LPOTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE L IDENTIFICATION 7 EPA SITE INSPECTION REPORT 043./.1.77R PART 6-WATER.DEMOGRAPHIC.AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA .. IMIMNKMIG WATER SUPPLY )1 TYPE OF oreaCI G SUPPLY 02 STATUS 03 DISTANCE TO SITE IMO MSI I SURF ACE WELL ENDANGERED AFFECTED MONITORED A.0 8.� A 0 0.0 C.)![ A Z S nu) dOM 0OMM MTY C.0 D. 0.0 E.0 F.0 8 13��ALL� mo WATER 4 ATEA USE M VG7ITY Cams sow ONLY SOURCE FOR DRINIUMG C M DRINKING 0 C OCNI ERCRAL.INDUSTRIAL.6RrGAT1ON ❑0 NOT USED.UHG)SEAMLE Kwor Mees 1111111111 GIM.Ras MrI.a.IIIIIN.er 1 COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL.IRRIGATION lea IOW aer~OM aee.er j� NIiNii..., ..J3dAlLi IM1v 3 7 "rr4a ,,/ 03 0TANCE TO NMREST O (NG WATE11 WELL ` (Mil :P TN TO GAOUIC MATER Mi�44.14,, OS OIECT1ON OF GROUNDWATER FLOW 06 D E M OF OONGERN OFAQUIFER TO AOU ER 01 POTENTIAL.YELO 0$SOLE SOURCE AO(. ER `bA,,l1_ 42-S0 r tI►tuA- N W /— 42 rn) UALA"O (poo) AYES C NO SORPTION OF WELLS rwYw aim w arae.r.E..a~mow we armor I . Agre ,-eA-- 4l.lege 4/f-c.. . 4...41 Nti f" /fi .e. (Lee =zofr.,g-a Ac ik.-Fps ct Wil, 4 auee1/4. C►MRGE AREA ` }. 3000 /?� MIA) 4 sl J� 1 I DISCHARGE WA ! YES `COMMENTS / , I � itL1(�lA/M{��bMcr 0 YES COMMENTS I O" 0 NO 111 SURFACE WATER 01 -•MACE WATER USE(OrM.we I A.RE WA �.• -�:a • 0!.LIGATION.ECONOMICALLY 0 C.COMMERCIAL.SCUSTR IAL IMPORTANT RESOURCES 0 0.NOT CURRENTLY USED ORINIUNG wECTEWPOTENTWly AFFECTED MOPES OF WATER WE: AFFECTED DISTANCE TO SRE Lo,,. 16/#..,.A �O4....d /,/ e..T Gc��h 0 �. D I(IAII) A) 0 (R* V.DEMOGRAPHIC AND PROPERTY INFORMATION )TAL POPULATION WITHIN 02 DISTANCE TO NEAREST POPULATION Fo Ar(14 (1)MILE OF SITE TWO(2)RALES OF SITE -W#WtT� OF SITE R)`C A. // 3 s.. 2/75 c. tj 11H► N,orr(RloNs NO SFPENIOS NO ormemo OM OF MILOIgs winos TIRO 12)Mtn OF an1 04 OIRANCE TO NEAREST OFF-SITE MULMI OG �� 0A Imo .CATION WTTP VCORY OF SITE"wee ou.ewe..swr..,�r..,an.nr■.ww.rN►.r r....P..waft 4.ouMNeaamrrem wr tea'/ .1/ 6, I 207013(741) 110(11.1I of- ‘7•10 4..6 I POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I.IDENTIFICATION =,EPA SITE INSPECTION REPORT 01 STATE 02 irr� A PART S-WATER.DEMOGRAPHIC,AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA `I 1V , I1.ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION 01 rE!\IEA/LRY OF UNSATuRATED ZONE VCJrw..s I C A. 10-6- 10-3 anvrc 0 8 10-4- 10-3 arly sc 0 C.10-•- 10-3 an/rc XD GREATER THAN 10-3 anvMc l PERWANlTr OF AEDROCK rote•err X A.MPEAMEABLE 0 8 RELATIVELY IMPERMEABLE 0 C RELATIVELY PERMEABLE ❑0.VERY PERMEABLE Ai.•ww f0-•er.eu ft0-4-10-4e.v..cr ft0_J-rO-•e.YG fOremrM rO-1 at am) J DEPTH TO BEOPiOCK 04 DEPTH OF CONTAMINATED SOL ZONE OS SOL 0H 750 , (1-4 lc LAP" ell Cl..1 �LK.o c•M I NET PRECPITATION 07 ONE YEAR 24 HOUR RANFALL OS SLOPE SITE SLOPE DIRECTION OF SITE SLOPE TERRAIN AVERAGE SLOPE /7 WI 2, ON0-3,0 x I /VW I 0 )F6.000 POTENTIAL 10 — 0 SITE IS ON BARRIER ISLAM/./.COASTAL HON HAZARD AREA.RIVERINE FL000W AY ATE IS N YEAR FLOODPLAIN 1 MST ANCE TO WETLANDS rs mere rwr+r 12 DISTANCE TO CRITICAL HAISTAT w..emgeree r♦.e«r ESTUARINE OTHER ONO A. (nil 8 ON ENDANGERED SPECIES -- ` LAND USE N VCNITr DISTANCE TO RESCENTIAL AREAS.NATIONAL/STATE PARKS, AGRICULTURAL.LANDS COMMS FORESTS.OR WILDLIFE RESERVES PANE AG LAND AG LAND A 3- 0 (nV) B. r`^'"- ' ono C. Ad- UN1 0 A41m11 •DESORPTION Of SITE N RELATION TO SURROIINDeG.TOPOORAPNY �j�, ' i ,:e... /4--/ /0 Cdi det" /l' u 41 Ar-Al/ ' r SOURCES OF INFORMATION row swim r....se..*4..w ra wows..A r..rw1111 W( C l 4 i/ ,I.I,•</e c/101 /9?V as§s //s4 .eF01.12O7O131741I 02 - 17/i 1+6' I I POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE DENTF1CATK)N SER SITE INSPECTION REPORT '.47 02 SITE'4' " fl PART S S.SAMPLE AND FIELD INFORMATION rJ` 1111.$AiIPLEU TAKEN 01 NSR OF 02 SAMPLES WAIT TO 03 EST14ATED DATE MILE E TYPE SAMPLES TM031 IESUITS AVAaAILE IO O PDWATER LWACE WATER I wAWE vp I .aJNOFF a WLL VEGETATION OT1ER FIELD MEASUREMENTS TAKEN < 'tME 02 COHEIRS / ` ,-lrG Him ,/1, Orj VQ ,}n at n i.0 J 4a". (OVA) --ea.Rte. O Vitri2 R fro-ra-, 2 pp Pin lb 3o PP(h., (pro 444/1y "st./?,r...,R.) V.PWOTOORAPIIS AND MAPS 1 TYPE tit MOUND O AERIAL 02 N axiom OF (..l.)Qoid(A.)61-1 d- c AO; C.,144 k_/i-M- --- 4..4 C . / MOM ft 11011011.111111,11111111.1•4411 3 MAPS 04 LOCATION OF MAPS gTEs t.LJcGI - L 0 NO .OTHER FIELD DATA COLLECTED r►..wr O..w..wPrr.i I , VL SOURCES OF INFORMATION IC110 iseeile 1111011010115.O. .w OM i..+..arIS.ANNINI+ . WC-LI 4/le, 4/14`je;//0/1 i9891 ill 'EPA F01rA 2010.13 0.411 ` eC -51,2_ i-' 7 I I A Ent‘ POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I.IDENTIFICATION SITE INSPECTION REPORT 0STATE 02 SRE�\'�! PART 7-OWNER INFORMATION0 V�f� CURRENT OWNERS) PARENT COMPANY r.sosegovar 1 _ 102 ON NIA�ER 'S os NAME 09 0.6 NUMSER ';',U-)1 , �r,� ho�A /i 0 /i2 f'cr/r)a// i i(a,6Ce , sniEET ADDRESS('041144 Aro.R, 04 SIC C00E I 0 STREET ADDRESS(r 0.SemMOI rs, T1 1 SIC C00E IIF), R . _ I arv �c h ht �1 N Y 0//9 sF� 12 Cn„ , STATE ,. BODE NAME 02 O.S NUM•ER OS NAME 09 0.5 NUMBER -STREET ADDRESS.o as..ram. ..•, 04 SIC CODE 10 STREET ADDRESS r.0 A.. Aro...•, 11 SC CODE CRY 106 STATE 07 DP CODE 12 CRY 12 STATE 1.ZIP COOS NAME 02 DS I ER 01 NAME -` NUIM09 0.5 NUMBER __ STREET ADDRESS,P o 1...IVO. ow, 04 SIC CAGE 10 STREET ADDRESS v o 1.. MO• s, 1 1 SIC COOS CRY O6 STATE 07 Zi CO0E 12 CRY 13 STATE 1•ZIP CODE 1 W1A- 02 04,S NUYMER OS NAME 000,s NUMIER SHEET ADDRESS,.o w.Aso..we, 0a SC COOS 10 STREET AOCRESS(P o w.Aro.ac, I I SC COOS CRY OS 06 STAT;07 ZIP COO( 12 CRY 13 STATE 1•ZP CODE r PREVIOUS OWNER S)r us,Nam..w.A.0 IV.REALTY OWNERS)rr rr..r.•.,.nmew mu, AMIE 020•SMusaDER 01 NAME ',,.). ( ©�02,D.SNUMSER O /l�T0r722f/0/? /r�IJQ.I (Cc-!,�C6z- _ Y1p /29 )7)jC_z�i"p2, avQe'CA-be& STREET ADDRESS 0,o ..'so..e, 04 SC CODE 03 STREET ADDRESS,.o M. Aso. sic, " [04 SC CODE OTy OS STATE 07 DP 030E OS CRY ]OS STATE 07 DP COOS ,'•NAME 02D.SIRsISER 01 NAME 02D•SNIAISER STREET ADDRESS P o.r..A.O..s, 04 SC CODE 03 STREET ADDRESS n 0 0.4.Aro.r:, 04 SC COOS I ?TY STATE 07 Z•COOS 05 CRY O6 STATE 07 ZP COCE NAA- 021).S I6uMER 8•01 NAME 02 D•11 R4JMER MEET*001EY(P o sea AYo..s., 04 SC COOS 03 STREET ADDRESS.o 4.4.1.09.44•., —04 SIC CODE 05 STATE 07 s!COOS 06 CRY r STATE 07 Zi CODE .SOURCES OF INFORMATION,o. •w..s.,..e....•..r.s1a..,f...w�.w, (,U CC I ,o/ / , 4.12/0 C -i o t1 / /q Si°L/ KIM 2070.13(741) -4/3 4.S I POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I.IDENTIFICATION EpASITE INSPECTION REPORT ° SWE02 /' PMT•-OPERATOR INFORMATION �' I CURRENT OPERATOR nt..r•w.c.ion warn OPERATOR'S PARENT COMPANY v.rrm., 1 NAME 02 D.S MAMA 10 NAME I t D.6 WARIER , .cm ; Ald—hL,,h 4,1 '2 f fn-)cziro-r2 Q.LI (.,-ea-�Xe- . IP o.Mr.AYo•.•e.1 04 SIC CODE 12 STREET ADDRESS Ir o w.AID• Act 13 SC CODE C /a,.1- LIN a STATE of a ODOE 14 CITY 1 s STATE 16 zp CODEI P2GonIC NY //935 1 oc OPO A11ON a NAME OP OWNER PREVIOUS OPERATOII(S)nil ism sow sot:rwsstr+r•110.11MIINOM NORM PREVIOUS OPERATORS'PARENT COMPANIESual•.s.e., 01 NAME 02 D.B MAMA 10 NAME 11 0.6 NUMBER 7 /'7 ;^^, ) Ol'f'�I �l"h �L�iuLC� �G o �� 1-� vie ea,bCc /9 C I TREET ADDRESS Ir 0 w.Aro•OR I 04 INC CODE t 2 STREET ADDRESS n o w.APO• s i l•SC CODE 0 (TY *ESTATE 07 a CODE 1 4 an 1 S STATE 16 ZP CODE /YEARS OF OPERATION -06 NAME OF OWNER puma T/66 PEhOD • 1111 MME 02 01.6 MASER 10 NAME 11 0.6 NUMBER 0'tTREET ADDRESS tr.o.Ila a0•.•e.I Os SRC GOOF 12 STREET ADDRESS Ir 0 w.Aro•.•e.I 13 SC GODS CITY 04 STATE 07 a CODE 1 CRY 16 STATE 16 ZP CODE Iii1 EARS of OPERATOR 'a NAME OF CRIMEA MOM nes PERIOD 01 NAME 02 D4.11 NUMBERi O NAME i 1 D B NUMBER { .T1EET Aa0Es61r 0 w Aro•.NA) Oi WC CODE 12 STREET ADDRESS Ir.o Ira Aro I.s, 12 SC CODE Im a STATE 07 2!ODOE 14 CITY 116 STATE-116 a CO0E as YEARS or OPEPIATIOPI as NAME or OWNER WWI TDB PERIOD ii .SOURCES OF INFORMATION IOM..r.crtl.rw6. c .. ....r..ammo mama Bei r GUCCI 00iT� �/ "d/k /98T I I . FORM 2070.13(7411 I ' POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE L N)ENTIFICATION ���A SITE INSPECTION REPORT o/t /�JJJI JTA-02 SrT� IL Er+ PART 9.OENERATORRRANSPORTER INFORMATIONI A ON-SITE GENERATOR 01 NAPE 02 0+S NUMBER /44. Ni/A t-11,41 I13 STREET AGGRESS rr 0 ..Aro.at r 04 SIC cfl0E l 4.A.I A-C'Ce-pi: 4tAl-4 /4%1(441 741 a+rYlk LOIN 06 STATE 07 23P CODE r(•f {/I II NI.OFF-SITE GENERATORS) 01 NAME '02 O+S NUMMI 01 NAME 02 0+S NUMBER /20 ii1 fc(rr22tiCi) .La.:CL.b(e - I..3 STREET spoons r.0 .aro.sic, I a SIC CODE 03 STREET ADDRESS r.O as. Aro. «c, 04 SIC CODE iCRV $06 STATE'07:COOS OS CITY 06 STATE 07 LP COO( R01 NAME +02 0+9 NUMBER 01 MAME 02 0+6 NUM6E01 3 11 STREET ADDRESS rr 0 w.Aro. we r 04 SIC CODE 03 STIIEET ADDRESS or,o sm.Aro. we r 04 SIC COOS i are E6 STATS 07 VP COOS 06 CRY 06 STATE 07 ZIP CODE IIN.TRANSPORTERS) I NAME -02 0+ NUMBER _01 NAME 02 0+9 NUMBER A00 /,?,0r/i?Q- ',C)7 LC IJ.24!a_46(e_- 03 STREET ADDRESS rr O r..WO a.oft r 04 INC COOS 03 STREET ADDRESS rP 0 No.Aro*IOC) 04 SIC COOS S CRY OS STATE'07 Z!COOS OB CRY 06 STATE 07 ZIP CODE + /n 1 NAME 02 04 II ISArER 01 NAME 02 O+S NUMBER I03 STREET AOOIESS r►O 6r.•KD..am r 04 MB CODE 03 STREET ADDRESS(Po am.ABO&oft o 04 SIC CODE A $CRY OS STATE 07 CONE I�CTI OS STATE 07 ZIP COOS 1111 SI. SOURCES OF INFORMAT1ON rem rs.ra a.rsiwa M..ism assammo atomic ammo Iti.)cCI. ,pITi ,ti.,,a eC110/, /98 f 11 4 n FORM 2070.13(7 41) .z — is.-- 50 I I POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE IDENTIFICATION 1,�� SITE INSPECTION REPORT °N AA 02 SITE/µ A PART 10•PAST RESPONSE ACTlVmES Ai /�/may' IAST RESPONSE ACTTVTTES 01 0 A WATER SUPPLY CLOSED 02 DATE 03 AcaecY 04 OESGR IMON /2 o / / f7 C/7 va.c.Qd(e //Q) 1 04 0 S. TEMPORARY WATER SUPPLY PROVIDED 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESCi+flON • /2/C. 1 01 0 C PERMANENT WATER SUPPLY PROVIDED 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION /2/ 01 0 0 SPLI.ED MATERIAL REMOVED 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 oesa PT10N /2/ CL- 01 0 E CONTALINA.a. !!MOVED 02 DATE 03 AGERC' /) / (.,?- 01 0 F WASTE REPACKAGED 02 DATE 03 AGENCY i 04 DESORPTION ` /) / Q 01 0 0 WASTE DISPOSED ELSEWHERE 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION 4/ a- ' 01 0$ ON STE BURIAL 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESORPTION /7)/ 101 ❑I.N SITU OEMCAL TREATMENT 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DE3 TION r)/ CL 01 0.1 M SRU BIOLOGICAL TTE:ATL ENT 02 DATE _ 03 AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION /) / a_ ' 01 0 K.N SRU PHYSICAL TREATMENT 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION ✓I/'a_ 01 0 L ENCAPSULATION 02 DATE 03 AGENCY I04 DESCRIPTION 01 0 M BrERGENCY WASTE TREATMENT 02 DATE 03 AGENCY -i 04 DESORPTION a_ /)/ 01 0 N CUTOFF WALLS • 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION f) / 'GL MI 01 0 O.EMERGENCY DIKING/SURFACE WATER DIVERSION 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION /)i'� I 01 0 P.CUTOFF TRENCHES/SUMP 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESORPTION . i/ / a.,,, • -' 01 O 0.BuexURFACE CUTOFF WALL 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESCIRPTION 1IY 30701317411 I POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE L IDENTIFICATION u&EPA SITE INSPECTION REPORT o1 STATE 02 STTE 4,E, PART 10•PAST RESPONSE ACTIVITIES y Nili PAST RESPONSE ACTIVITIES ic.wr, I 01 0 R.BARER WALLS CONSTRUCTED 02 DATE 03 AGENCY Os 0E3T1OH 20 7(77ter7i)( 14-7 /? CC(iC..a(;( r'CL. 'fig Q IDI C S. CAPPINGCOVERING 02 DATE • 03 AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION _ 12/ Q, 01 C T MAX TANKAGE REPAIRED 02 DATE 03 AGENCY I04 CE:9CRIPTIONN r 01 0 U.GROUT CURTAIN CONSTRUCTED 02 DATE 03 AGENCY , O4DE3cTN 01 C Y BOTTOM SEALED 02 DATE 03 AGENCY I 04 0E9CRP13ON I ///?Q- 01 Siw GAScottrnOL 11 / 02 DATE 03 _71:211.P-12---.5-01 AGENCY F 77 OLD 0l0E3CRPi10N (+qe ,.c2.,7/i1 y 'At-/1 G�14 7D 0�i 60,1�s1 / s/Ld ay ii.,e/t di—e,_,. 01 G X. ARE CONTROL O 02 DATE 03 AGENCY Oa OE3CRPT1ONN 1/ / a__ 01 0 Y.LEACNATE TREATMENT 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION i 0 / a - 01 0 Z.AREA EVACUATED 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION (2 / 0t/ 01 0 1 ACCESS TO STE RESTRICTED 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 0E9CFPT1ONN^ i // a 01 0 2. POPULATION RELOCATED 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 OEScRPT1ON , 01 0 3.OTNER PEM DIAL ACTIVITIES 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESCIPTION^ L SOUK=OF INFORMATION mat west 1..u__...•..IMO age owe~ea____ wC C r ,oil , 4.4 C.//o/ , /98 riteS ok 7/ , Ji,,.--e 2.3,/913 oORr,20Y013(74,, 1 . I IPOTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE L OENTIFICATION CEPA SITE INSPECTION REPORT o,yr` -oz srrEm�r?E PART 11-ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION /V // ``�� �� ,ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION , o 'AST REOULATORYIEWORCBAEMT ACTION XYES 0 NO 1 EsanvnoN OF FEDERAL.STATE.LOCAL IEGULATORNiE YEP(T AcnoN Is ok 6. Apf °' Audi; cv-k-z, xyus.,7',i,,i N Y51) -(_. LE6AL. 40r70 A) ,44iiMSr r/fe TDwA.) of 5O 7H kx.) IL.A-nOFILL ow/yeti- 1)t)E 7a , 5,57eAir JiOtMT/otic 7b PA-7-47 3( oi6u(AraA)S /A) 77ex/R 440 ,Df/c( oPeitA 711 J$ I ( ,Z-//Z./74 -- N y5 06C 44%)n 4 ltf-44.+• i 7-de l - I kfh 1,.(A ///10/79 ) . I — OA on Co o" 5//6//979 po-io/0-110as pc..-f` 364o 6 /U YCs R I — 11-e. /a".4,411 w It.o t��.�,,,a..a.tPe A 4.4,, O/b2 -, , o4 00/ eA C4 Q toio r� d /o & .' imoo t)-60(71/14.4144•<- .., of 44 (.e)( µe. -( ?ik- trrif6- iNt-'414"3- ), 90 CFR ,o v '73. I • AIN V%o% likPij. (4/t)YCAR Pa-f-1- 703) C�rD i.A..-id W i-f r ,l sr La — O- '/5/82 - k for„ L v/d wav iso/ ",v;., eoey/Lame._ I SOURCES OF INFORMATION ca.ream Nosoomos..•.MINN SIM MOM.,w..WIMP • 111 SCDiiS /E rc c , 11/,2/7g. ! JYSDEC CErra,z DifrFo //io/775 75.4.4v JF S,)urf/N> 4-'....:4-77:57-3:1 207043(741) Il ;4-. "/? 53 I TABLE I SOURCES OF INFORMATION Office/ Contact Date of Date of Phone Telephone Inerea Agency Location Person '/;sit Conversation Number .1I NYSDEC Wildlife Resources Larry Brown 12-11-84 several, 12/84 (518) 439-7486 L is Division of Fish & Wildlife Center Significant Habitats Unit Delmar, NY 12054 Specific NYSDEC H 3 Alb Rood Hans Dirzvweit 12-12-84- several, 12/84 (518) 457-2051 orlon Division of Solid and Albany, NY Earl Borcorr 12-14-84 Hazardous Waste, Bureau of Municipal Waste "ic/ NYS Dept. of Parks, Agency Bldg 01 Lenore Kuwicic 12-12-84 various, 12/84 (518) 474-3176 mark Recreation & Historic Empire State Plaza Preservation Albany, NY 12238 Division far Historic Preservation lands NYSDEC Albany, NY Sharon O'Connor 12/84 (518) 457-3431 Division of Fish & Wildlife, Habitat Inventory IUnit water d NYSDEC-Region I 91dg 040 Mike Fiscino several, 12/84; (516) 751-1389 as SUNY 1/85 •r1 is in St.ny Br:.ak, NY 11794 , Suffolk ties ••rater NYSDEC-Regan II 2 World Trade Center Joe Pone various, 12/84 (212) 488-2758 1 ( istal Rm 6126 LS sn New York, NY 10047 t ..ounty _ titer NYSDEC-Region IV Rt. 10, Stamford, Maynard Vance various, 12/84 (607) 652-7364 i ( istal New York 12167 tic s in Iand Icier res cific NYS Dept. of Health Corning Tower Ron Tromontano 12-12-84 various, 12/84 (518) 473-8427 I ion Division of Health Risk Bldg., ESP Steve Bates Control, Bureau of Toxic Albany, NY 12237 Substance Amessnxnt cific NYS Law Department Justice Bidg.-Rm 245 Michael Moore 12-12-84 various 12/84; (518) 474-1190 on- Albany, NY 13224 2/85 loer County ict Jral/ NYS Dept.. of Agriculture State Campus Louise Inglis 12-13-84 various, 12/84 (518) 457-2713 gri- and Marken. Divisors Bldg. No. 8, Room 805 Land of Rural Affairs Albany, NY 12235 tion er NYSDEC Division of 50 Wolf Rood 12-14-84 various, 12/84 (518) 457-5668 $ Water Resources Albany, NY 12233 I I I I I 5 L4 ITABLE I SOURCES OF INFORMATION (continues) IOffice/ Contact Date of Dote of Phone Telephone erea A9encv Location Person Visit Conversation 'ember xcrfic ':YSDEC 50 Wolf Rd. Anita Grikstas 12-14-84 (518) 457-0639 I anon :vision of Solid & Albany, NY 12233 H(1zardous Waste • Specific ?ensselaer County County Office Bldg. John Sheehan 12-27-84 several, 12/84; 518) 270-2670 tion- -+ealth Dept. 1600 7th Ave. 2/85 • leer ITroy, NY 12180 Sites oecific Albany County South Ferry and Cliff Forondo 12-284 several. 12/84 (518) 445-7835 )tion- Health Dept. Green Streets Steve Lukowski c County Albany, NY 12201 Ben Pierson 111 • -iforce- NYSDEC 202 Mamaroneck Ave. Mike Tone several, 12/84; (914) 761-6660 Division of Environ- White Plains, NY 10601 1/85 mental Enforcement A USEPA-Region II 26 Federal Plaza Carol Peterson several, 12/84; (212) 264-4197 IC" Site Hazardous Waste New York, NY 10278 Kathy Moyk 1/85 (217) 744-8677. Site Branch ific 'IYSDEC-Region IV 2176 Guilderland Ave. George Elston various. 12/84; (518) 382-0680 anon- Schenectady, NY 12306 Mike Styk 1/85 -Inv ane •s ser 4Sites pecific Suffolk Co. Dept. IS Horse Block P1. Frank Randall various 11/84; (516) 451-4633 ation- of Health Services Farmingville, NY Jim Pim 12/84 'c County Jim Moloney ii ific Nassau Co. Dept. 240 Old Country Road Joe Schechter 12/)3/84 (516) 535-2406 anon- of Health Mineola, NY Larry Sang sc• County 's supply in Suffolk Co. Dept. 225 Rabro Dr. East Paul Ponturo 12/7/84 (516) 348-2886 Co. of Health Services Hauppauge, NY 11788 Richard Meyer Ixific NYSDEC Region II 2 World Trade Center Armand DeAngelis 12/7/84 (212) 488-3862 tion- New York, NY Sol Ervolina 12/26/84 County Sites cific 'JYCDEP 2358 Municipal Bldg. Tim Slauson 12/27/84 (212) 669-8934 I tion- New York, NY 10007 Anthony lanarelli 12/20/84 (212) 669-8939 ounty Sites Stony Moriates 12/7//44 (212) 566-8977 17 Stan Cepenberg Kim Sperber 12/10/84 (212) 566-1647 cific NYSDEC Building 40 Bob Schneck various (515) 751-7900 Iion- Region I SUNY at Stonybrook Bob Becherer 12/84 C I b II Sites nts NYSDEC Building 40 Tony Cadella 12/12/84 (516) 751-7900 Region I SUNY at Stonybrook i & II Well Points I I II I I I I 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The Southold Landfill is located on North Road, Cutchogue, New York. The Southold Landfill is located in the northeast part of Long Island, in Suffolk County, and is about 50 feet above mean sea level (USGS, 1956). The site occupies an area of 41 acres, however, the active landfill area is only 20 acres (Figure I). The site is situated in a predominantly agricultural area. The topography or the site is generally flat with a borrow pit depression approximately 50 feet deep along its eastern margin. At its west margin, there are two depressions that comprise two septic sludge lagoons. The area slopes downward gently (0-1.0%) from northwest to southeast towards Cutchogue Harbor located approximately 2.3 miles from the site and is part of the Great Peconic Bay. Long Island Sound is located to the north, approximately one mile from the site. The site is fenced in and has a security guard 10 hrs/day, controlled entry and signs posted. A guard shack, collection center and a storage building are located on site. There is a paved road along the southwestern edge of the landfill. I I I r E281.3/227B 3-I Cv I I I 4.0 SITE DATA I4. 1 SITE AREA SURFACE FEATURES IThe Southold Landfill site is located in an area that slopes downward gently (0- 1.0%) from northwest to southeast towards Cutchogue Harbor, which is part of the 1 Great Peconic Bay and is located approximately 2.3 miles from the site. Long Island Sound is located toward the north, approximately one (I) mile fryn the site. No critical wildlife habitats are located within 3 miles. However the Old House and the Fort Corchaug Site are historic or landmark sites located within that distance. I The predominant land use in the site area is agricultural. Two cemeteries and ione school are located within one mile of the site. I4.2 SITE HYDROGEOLOGY ' 4.2.1 Ground-Water Occurrence JThe Southold Landfill is located in an area mantled with outwash deposits which overlie stratified sand with some gravel deposits. The borrow pit along the east side Iof the landfill shows a stratigraphic section of interbedded sand and gravel with dark beds of clayey silt. Ground water in this area occurs in lenses of variable thickness Ifrom a few feet up to several hundred feet (Franke and McClymonds, 1972). The thickness of these coarse grained deposits beneath the landfill is about 140 feet. The Isaturated part of these coarse grained deposits is approximately 85 feet and is known as the Upper Glacial aquifer. It is a water table aquifer and constitutes the only source Iof drinking water in this region. Below these deposits there is a clay layer approximately 50 feet thick which is believed to be quite extensive. Below this layer a second saturated coarse grained deposit approximately 50 feet is found (SCDHS Memorandum, 1 1981). I E281.4/227B 4-I I 5-1 I I I The water level in the vicinity o; the site is between 42 and 50 feet below the I ,round surface. The movement of ground water in the Upper aquifer is in a northwest direction towards the Long Island Sound. III Since the surficial materials are in general very permeable, recharge to the iground water occurs by infiltration of rainfall through these materials. 4.2.2 Ground-Water Quality IThe fresh ground water of Suffolk County is generally good. Less than 100 ppm of dissolved solids are typical. Gre-na ---11.,-r quality in the proximity of the site is 111 unknown. However, it probably has deteriorated due to a suspected leachate plume emanating from the Southold Landfill and/or due to the agricultural practices of the Iarea. In 1981, one on site well was tested for pesticides (endrin, lindane, methoxychlor, toxaphene), herbicides (2, 4-D and silvex), trace metals and other parameters. The I results showed that no pesticides or herbicides were present, metals were below maximum levels allowed in drinking water and only chloride (270 mg/I), color (30) and total dissolved solids (1500 mg/I) were in excess of the maximum values allowed. A pH of I6.4 and a conductivity of 2900 (umhos/cm) were measured. The concentration of PCB measured was 0.4 ppb (ERCO, 1981). I The water quality of the aquifer below the clay layer has been reported to be Iof satisfactory quality for drinking purposes (SCDHS, 1981). However, underneath this area the deep Magothy and the Lloyd aquifers are said to contain salty water (Franke 1 and McClymonds, 1972). 4.2.3 Ground-Water Use IThere is no public water supply available in the vicinity of the site. However, part of the area within a 3-mile radius of the site is served by public supply wells Imanaged by the Captain Kidd Water Co. serving Mattituck, and the Greenport Water District serving Greenport Village. Private wells supply water used for drinking and Ifarm irrigation. These wells tap only the Upper Glacial aquifer (Jensen and Soren, 1974). I E28I.4/227B 4-2 I 5q I 1 I =approximately 6..500 people within a 3-mile radius of the site rely on ground .voter as a source of drinking water. I4.3 PAST SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS Past sampling and analysis included samples from wells located on site and within iiithe general area of the site. See Section 4.2.2 Ground Water Quality for a description of analytical results. I The results of the analyses are included in A r,,iix B. I I I I I I I I II I I 281.41227B 4-3 I5-9 I I I I 5.0 DATA ADEQUACY I The data were somewhat adequate for scoring the HRS work sheets. The one exception was the score for Hazardous Waste Quantity. The amount of hazardous substances is not known although its existence is verified by the presence of hazardous compounds within leachate emanating from the landfill. The factor is, therefore, scored a (I). THz existence of leachate is supported by on-site well data which is the basis for arriving at a score of 45 for Observed Release. The Observed Release score together with the Targets score result in a relatively high Ground Water Route score. 11 The Surface Water Route score, on the other hand, is relatively low, due in large part to the very low Targets score. Again, the Hazardous Waste Quantity is I/ scored a (I). i I I I I I I I E281.5/227B 5-I I6 0 I I I 6.0 WORK PLAN 6.1 OBJECTIVES The objective of this proposed work plan is to collect field information required to prepare a final HRS score and develop conceptual remedial designs and cost estimates. Since there is not much information about the hydrogeology and the ground-water quality at the landfill site. t^;, work plan will address basic .questions concerning the presence of site contamination and ground-water flow and quality. The presence of a suspected leachate plume emanating from the site and the proximity to agricultural lands in the area suggest that potential health hazards may exist. The following work plan was developed under the assumption that existing wells on the site or in the site vicinity were not useable. In the event that sufficient data indicates that these wells have been installed properly and have been properly secured, the following work plan may be modified to include sampling of selected existing wells and possibly the installation of two or three new wells. The estimated time for drilling would subsequently be reduced. The remainder of the work plan shall remain the same. 6.2 FIELD INVESTIGATION PLAN 6.2.1 Preliminary Site Investigations A preliminary site visit will be made to tentatively select the monitoring-well locations, to evaluate the means of drill rig access in each case, and to identify property owners if access is required off site. In addition, a thorough site reconnaissance will be performed, and a survey of volatile organic emissions will be conducted close to any exposed barrels, using an HNU meter, Model PI 101. It is estimated that 2 person- days will be required for this work. I I E28I.6/227B 6-I I l0` I I 6.2.2 Geophysical Studies A geophysical survey utilizing the terrain conductivity technique will be performed at the site to aid in characterizing the hydrologic regime. This technique has been utilized successfully in locating subsurfce plumes of many different substances, including hydrocarbons and metals in landfill leachate. Measurements will be taken at various locations around the site to determine expected ranges of background or upgradient conductivity. Measurements will be taken across the dump site to identify anomalous conductivity distributions that may indicate buried metallic objects such as drums. The direction of ground-water flow is suspected to be in the northwest direction. Measurements will be taken at each one of the sides of the filled area to attempt to identify the presence and direction of movement of any existing plumes of contaminated ground water leaving the site and the quality of ground water flowing into the landfill area. Both the Geonics EM-3I and EM-34 conductivity meters will be used to perform the survey. It is estimated that a two person team will require 4 days including travel time, to perform the conductivity survey, with readings taken for exploration depths of 8 and 46 feet at each measurement station. The data will be plotted on maps and contoured. These contour maps will provide the basis for defining the exact location of borings and ground-water monitoring wells. 6.2.3 Monitoring Wells 6.2.3.1 Installation. Monitoring wells will provide data pertinent to the chemistry, the stratigraphy and the ground-water regime at the site. It is recommended that 4 monitoring wells be installed at the approximate locations shown in Figure 2. Final well locations will be determined after the conductivity survey is completed. One well (MW-I) will be installed at a presumed upgradient location, on the southeast side of the site. This well will provide background data on the ground water flowing into the area. 111 Wells MW-2 and MW-3 will be installed at downgradient locations and will provide water quality information on ground water leaving the site. E281.6/227B 6-2 11 1 I i IMW-3 MW-4 1- FENCE I BORROW PIT AREA +� (7 i. 77 ��G 104. ACTIVE LANDFILL AREA (172,-..„. ISEPTIC LAGOONS + COLLECTION \ MW-2 CENTER 1 I772 t OLD LANDFILL AREA COVERED ,c I WITH VEGETATION GUARD SMACK 11 * STORAGE 0 { OBUILDING ,- �; \--GATE Ir 777 I \7 s MW-1 P PO 1 OP e4 LEGEND y PROPOSED MONITORING WELL J,^ONMEti T Pm:16ne 10. A..y.o.w` LOCATION PLAN I �t~ .ps .,,a� NEI .ORM STATE . FOR PROPOSED PHASE II INVESTIGATION ► :>'a�. .�o= DEPARTMENT Of EN MONUMENTAL CONSERVATION SOUTHOLD LANDFILL SITE =X». Y _.::'_".o-: '".r- S� Nab ReMO .u0w>, Now.ve.a 17213 D wormy G Wwynw,fonMMII•O v, weOn�O a WOODWARD—CLYDE CONSULTANTS. INC. I : e,r}*t6a V:3k.AasCCONSULTING ENGINEERS.GEOLOGISTS ANO ENVIRONWENTAL SCIENTISTS i D..rew cif Sahel pm wrase...MaimNEM TORII NEW YORK 1t si No. « NOMnsnsa.►.E OR •Y BID SCALE NONE Imo./ NO 82C4648-3 yEII vook SSP. D..Teio, co o oY LR DATE 20 MAR 1985 FIG No 2 1 6 1 1 All monitoring wells will be installed so as to sample the upper 10 feet of ground water, The ground-water table in the vicinity of the site varies between 42 and 50 feet below the ground surface. It is estimated that total well depth Hill average 56 feet for all monitoring wells installed at the site. Borings will be advanced through overburden by 4-inch I.D. hollow-stem augers or driven casing. Split-spoon samples will be obtained at 5 foot intervals. Blow counts will be recorded during each sampling. Soil samples will be classified in the field by a hydrogeologist using the Unified Soil Classification system. Selected samples will be sent to our geotechnical laboratory for grain-s:ze analysis and Atterberg tests and soil- moisture determinations. Two samples from each newly installed well are expected to be collected f or analysis. To maximize information on any volatile organic contaminants, headspace surveys will be conducted on soil samples using a portable HNU meter, Model PI 101. These data will be used to evaluate relative concentrations of organic contaminants in various stratigraphic horizons. I Slotted 2-inch I.O. PVC well screen will be installed over 10-foot intervals in 111 each overburden well, with a riser casing of flush joint, threaded, 2-inch I.D. PVC pipe. Risers will extend at least 3 feet above the ground surface to prevent contamination by surface-water flooding. A gravel pack will be completed to approximately 2 feet above the top of the screen, where a I-foot bentonite seal will be emplaced. To further assure that water samples will be representative of the screened interval, the remaining annular space will be grouted, and a protective steel casing will be installed. After installation, any wells completed in overburden will be developed by pumping, to remove any fine-grained material. It is estimated that IS workings days will be required to perform inspection during the drilling, well installation operations, and surveying well elevations, headspace analysis of soil samples, slug-type permeability testing in each well and plotting data. 6.2.3.2 Water Elevations. Ground-water depths will be measured at the time of well development and again at the time of sampling. Relative well elevations will be I E28I.6/227B 6-3 I L I I I surveyed by WCCI personnel or subcontractor. Water-level elevations will be plotted and used to develop contours of the ground-water table at the site. Based on this map, the direction(s) of ground-water flow will be derived. Flow and gradient data will constitute fundamental input in quantifying site conditions and will be assessed together with the plume geometries inferred from geophysical survey data. 1 6.2.3.3 Aquifer Testing. "Slug"-type permeability tests will be conducted in each newly installed well to evaluate the permeability of materials spanning the sc7eerred interval. The method is a rapid means by which the in-situ permeability in the immediate vicinity of a monitoring well can be approximated. The test does not involve pumping of potentially contaminated water and results generally suffice for ground-water flow analysis. 6.2.4 Sampling and Analysis Plan 6.2.4.1 General Plan. The site-specific Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Plan will be developed by WCCI and approved by the NYSDEC prior to commencement of work. I 6.2.4.2 Sampling Parameters. The laboratory analyses will focus on chemical screening techniques to determine the type and range of concentration and the migration of contaminants in ground water. The specific types of contaminants are unknown, but are suspected to include metals, volatile organics, pesticides and herbicides. The full prority pollutant analysis will be performed on one downgradient well sample, on one upgradient well sample, on one soil sample and on one leachate sample. The remaining samples will be analyzed for priority pollutant metals, volatile organics and water quality parameters. Samples will be collected from ground water, soils and leachate. Sample types and chemical parameters are summarized in Table 2. 6.2.4.3 Sampling Locations. One water sample and one soil sample from each of the four ground-water monitoring wells will be analyzed. Results from each pair I E281.6/227B 6-4 I I Table 2. PROPOSED CHEMICAL ANALYSES AT SOUTHOLD LANDFILL SITE I ANALYSES I Full Priority I Volatile Water Pollutant Sample Type Metals Organics Quality'_ Analysis2 Remarks I Ground Water X X X X One sample at each of 4 wells. Soil X X X One sample from I unsaturated zone at each of 4 wells. IILeachate X One sample only. Air X Upwind and downwind I locations using OVA or HNU. I I I Water Quality Parameters: TOC, Chloride, Color, Odor, Sulfate, TDS, Conductivity, pH. 2 Two ground water samples, one upgradient and one downgradient. One soil Isample and one leachate sample. I I I E28I.7/2278 I I I / & (D I I of analyses will be compared to evaluate any downardmigration of contaminants through soil. Ground-water analysis will be evaluated in terms of other hydrogeologic data to evaluate the presence, distribution, and migration directions of any ground-water contamination. Surface water samples will not be collected since the closest surface water is approximately 1 .1 miles from the site. Air samples will be analyzed using an HNU or an Organic Vapor Analyzer (OVA) at upwind and downwind locations. This ✓ey will provide information concerning concentrations of volatile organics, if any, that are being released from the site. It :s estimated that '+ person-days will be required to collect all required ground water and leachate samples. 6.3 HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN I Health and safety apparel and equipment are expected to be required during the major field activities — initial site investigation, geophysical studies, drilling and monitoring-well installation and water sampling. For the purpose of costing the investigation, Level D protection is assumed in each case. The health and safety precautions and procedures actually employed will conform to the generalized NYSDEC Health and Safety Plan, and will be developed by WCCI on a site-specific basis. Should protective levels higher than Level D be required for any activity, costs will be in accordance with the unit costs indicated in the attachment supplied to the NYSDEC April 1985. 6.4 REPORT PREPARATION Report preparation will involve analysis of the data as well as preparation of the text. Included in this task are the compilation and organization of the data, editing of boring logs, reduction of hydrologic data, preparation of graphical representations, analysis and calculations, updating the HRS score for the site and report reproduction. 1 E281.6/227B 6-5 67 -31 I In addition, remedial concepts will be developed along with order-of- magnitude remedial �OStS. 6.5 COST ESTIMATE • Costs for Phase II work were developed based on NYSDEC Audit and Control Guidelines, using assumptions described in WCCI's cost propsoal submitted to NYSDEC on October 29, 1982, subsequent contract D000452 dated March 31 , 1983, and the generic work plan developed by NYSDEC. Costs have been grouped by task, and estimates are presented in Table 2. Lumo sum cost arrangements will be provided for Tasks i, 2, 3, 6 and 7. For Tasks 4 and 5, Drilling/Well Installation and Sampling and Analysis respectively, lump sum cost arrangements will be provided with the exception of drilling and well installation subcontracted costs, and chemical analytical laboratory subcontracted costs. Analytical costs include trip and field blanks, spike and replicate samples and shuttle costs as required by the NYSDEC QA/QC Laboratory Protocol. The subcontracted cost items will be billed at cost plus five percent. Any activity that involves work or levels of effort beyond the scope of this work plan will be billed in accordance with the unit rates indicated in the attachment provided dated April 1985. I I I I I I E28I.6/227B 6-6 (D q 1 r ill" r - i - 1 - t r i - 1 1 1 1 r r r TABLE 3 ESTIMATED COSTS FOR PnASE 11 INVES11uAT1ON SOUTHOLD LAND,-ILL • • LABOR • OTHER DIRtCT COSTS • • • • • Direct Overnead Total Consul- Sub-Con- Travel Al r+ealtn I Special Soectal Sample Office • • • TASKS hours Coot Cost Cost tants tractors Suosts- Safety Testing Equip- 6nzPwent Services • TOTAL • • tence Gear • wont Ici • • • Apo. I 1 i • • • • •• I. Mork, health / • • • Safety and • • • OA/OC Plans 75 1385 1593 2978 0 d 0 200 • 3178 • 1 • • • • • • 2. Preliminary • • • Investigations • • • and Site Visit 24 441 507 948 134 140 275 0 • 1497 • a _• • • • 3. Geophysical • • • Studies 96 1753 2016 3769 536 560 2200 8 • 7063 • • • • • •• 4. Drilling/11e11 • • • Installation 120 2220 2553 4773 10642 1248 840 1592 2280 250 0 • 21623 • • • • • 5. Sampling and • • • Analysis 70 1288 1481 2769 29960 402 420 1030 650 8 • 33231 • • _ • • • • • 6. Report • • • Preparation 152 2860 3289 6149 1300 0 0 • 1517 • 9166 • • .-.._ • • • 7. Project • • • Management 82 2045 2352 4397 634 0 0 400 • 3431 • • • • • TOTALS 619 11992 13791 25783 1500 40602 2954 1960 1592 5785 900 2117 • 83194 • • FEE 3867 75 2030 • 5973 • • TOTAL a • • ESTIMATED COST 29651 1575 42632 2954 1960 1592 5783 900 2117 • 89166 • 111 Level D protectl 181 Includes direct project office costs, reproduction and postage. WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS WASTE SITE INSPECTION REPORT Name of Site: c LA. t•- ' F County: 5 uPro(_K Address: No tar-k R o r C C- u F _ rv. Y i i`13 5 Inspector: t] D.0 D t`1 u SCALD Time and Date of Inspection: / oc) /)r►t / IWeather Conditions: Sun) N Y sti,A Q rh L SITE DESCRIPTION 1. Type of Site: 2. Buildings on Site? (2:5.aino If yes, describe: &u. R Y2.W S 1+ 4CIS A Surface Impoundment �B Piles GCS Li-E(.T lc N G�NtEe. sSDG. C Drums Above Ground D Tank Above Ground E Tank Below Ground F Landfill G Landfarm H Open Dump I Other I (/14-ea ��� 3. Area of Site: !,f � ry C 2?�� ���A��/ L e/ � o General Description: en p j 'Atit44-11411/16fr ‘#(A-71--- jAtt'Al- "A:474 _ (..,W/v-u6-10- .col 4441-A-42 I a I Page 2 of 13 IL INTERVIEW RECORD 1 1. Name(s): J A :'''t i?S ' Ow get. i , C I3-POelltlikic S4N ra- tcvti `' 2 Position(s): S Pak_u►sv.t o FOR ern/4 N I3. Telephone Number: @- r ,) 73 iUw N C. Sv L4.T t-.— 76F�� O 4. Name of Current Owner of Site: � D 1 5. Address of Current Owner of Site: NOWT 1-{ 1Z11). C-CkTG1() G.1..l E J N YIII 6. Time Period Site Was Used for Hazardous Waste Disposal: , 195 ( To paES'EN� , 19 Is site Activ Inactive at present? Past Sampling Activities: it Ground W: None Surface Water 1 Soil Remedial Action: Pro.o Under Design in Progress Completed I IStatus of Legal Action: State ) Federal IPermits Issued: Federal Local Government SPDES S u F F) (AA) T C Solid Waste'. Mined Land Wetlands Other 111 I I 1 -, Page 3 of 13 IL INTERVIEW RECORD (continued) Waste Characteristics: nwy�-�"� -L"�vY" `-�`���`� L (A- I I I I 1 Other Information: (site history, operator information, generator/transporter information, past response activities, legal actions, hazardous incidents, other Iinformation). (4,13;(j0 I 1 I I I I 1 1 -1a r Page 4 of 13 M. SURFACE WATER 111 1. Is there identifiable leachate? o If yes, describe: r-P CLCef r 2. Is site competely surrounded by higher ground: yea/'uncertain from field observations 3. Appropriate distance to nearest observed downgradient body of Surface water; (0(� 0 0 JDescription: ,r,.tn d_ 2 - Use: &y, a!" 1 4. Average slope of site: 396 5-8% 3-5% >8% i &/no 5. On site ponding? If yes, describe: ,,,,,,4e11 O'T' c t U`T— .,2La-4 'fl"L vn 3 r 6. Average slope oof�f--rrteerraine between site and nearest observed down slope surface water body: 134br 5-8% 3-5% 8% 7. In an area of floodplain? es P r r -13 1 1 Page 5 of 13 IM. SURFACE WATER (continued) I8. Damage to floral fauna from surface water? yes/; If yes, describe: / u I 111 I 9. Surface Features (general topography, 9+ r h avis structures, etc.): /1-7 i J--c , " 4tA44--41 i?'64e7d, It-J.41_14_1J c,f• eLle44/1 0,4777 ,.A614ZEIL/e?4'4-441n <-44 1 1+ 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 Page 6 of 13 I IV. GROUND WATER I1. On site wells? ddr none observed If yes: number 3 r- p location l ` n�� ` description 1 2. Observations concerning ground water 1 i I3. Observations concerning stratigraphy " • 1 I 4. Damage to flora/fauna from ground water? yes/r6 If yes, describe. I i 1 Page 7 of 13 V. AIR 1 1. Evidence of air contaminants emitted from site: 111 C)--Ty-'7'-A. •-r,, ra p vv\ 3 b -c i II I I 1 I 2. Rationale for attributing the contaminants to the site: v 6- 0-44.41,4:4-gr I I I 1 6 I Page 8 of 13 IVI. DEMOGRAPHYLAIVD USE 1 1. Distance to nearest observed off-site building 'IVO 2. Distance to nearest observed residence 3[7 c) F I 3. Estimated number of households within a radius of 1/4 mile 4. Distance to nearest observed commercial/industrial land use ci Description: 5. Distance to nearest observed agricultural lands 200��(.�� Description: ,_„7 ‘.,..t t,v( II 6. Observed historic landmark sites? a/no Golutz4c6 C c9 C-ht"O,..0`e5 ✓'«'4r1 If yes, describe, give approximate distance: 3 go `"L ETY 7. Observed park/open space area? yes) If yes, describe, give approximate distance: 1 I8. Observed wetlands or low-lying area? yea/46110 If yes, describe, give approximate distance and area in acres: I 9. Observed critical habitat or wildlife refuge? yes& If yes, describe, give approximate distance: I 10. General description of use of adjacent lands. ar I 71 i Page 9 of 13 I VII. WASTE CHARACTERISTICS I1. Physical State of Waste Comments solid, stable ' solid, unstable h.,c, _,�( �;w. ,1/41,.-€I f,/ powder, fines ✓ sludge slurry I liquid gas other 2. Estimated quantity of waste:. '-f c.) 4.0 /0d a —614, 111 3. Estimated quantity of waste that appears fully contained: Yw _ 4. Odors? (/no If yes, describe: r -*�J� 61 -/,.- C�d p 5. Observations concerning suspected waste materials I I 1 i Page 10 of 13 I VIII. WASTE CONTAINWENT 1 1. Observed soil/rock material underlying site: c AL4 . ,a-�,�t -�'- 4 4- I X11- (-'4"` 1 aturgl'/artificial/unknown permeability: low o ed re �gF" 2. Diversion system? yes Description/condition: I3. Leachate collection system? yes Description/condition: i I4. Is there diking? yes ; If yes, is it sound/unsound?I 5. If diking exists, does it have adequate freeboard? yes/J 6 If site has containers (i.e., 55-gallon drums): are they sealed and in sound condition or leaking? -3.-79 ajd,,(,nj4 7. If waste is inP ilea a. Are piles ncovered? b. Is waste stabilizend ed. I 8. If waste is in a landfill: ' () Is there potential for ponding on surface of landfill? b. Is there potential for erosion? 44,14"7 TY s c. Is there refuse visible at surface? 1-6.6 d. If covered, is the cover seeded/vegetational cover? •Yv0 I Page 11 of 13 I VIII. WASTE CONTAINMENT (continued) 1 9. Damage to flora/fauna from direct contact? yesno 1 If yes, describe: I I 10. Security - 24-hour surveillance - no barriers - security gua /0 HRS/ - controlled entry � 1om to barrier = signsposted pe - incomplete barrier 1 11. Comments concerning waste containment: ../1-"1" I I I I I gc IPage 12 of 13 IX. SITE D VESTIGATION FEASIBILITY 1. Accessible to vehicles? Co If no, why: 2. Accessible to drill rig? /no If no, why: 1 3. Nearest drilling water source: C.1--t. 4. Accessible to backhoe: (/no If no, why I5. Geophysical Surveys: Accessible: 40 /no Overhead interference Surface interference Subsurface interference 6. Accessibility of adjacent off-site lands: 7. Comments I I IPage 13 of 13 X. SCETC3-ES, PHOTOGRPAHS II-2_ irL.A4,-- 0---rivrzr%6 I N I ITO T P(, A aZ 4 4 ( A-cfC t.S l /6-4-771. I1 CD L J (L s �L ..P.CP43cNS n.xrwaC ACTd� ,\ LANOFla aagRp4J I pc FLEA 17 P i-r— VeCa PfRtF4 -\ &- ii-/t/ 4,QEq I COVELCO war►' 1/KA:r-RT%0N ` l 1 ' l CoL►.ccro0 C EArr VA 1-11 I Dkr la GKAao FLWICk I __ I \ 1j44., (p- ,AA,a4,44 ,d4/44-44"464-. 111 NaY vle-444) N 70 I 3 a NMI NI SIM INS Ell MR In MN NI 111111 111111 MN MI m , c«ve/ Agaiculturaat Land and Prime Farmland to Candidate Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites S'LZe ,S - 5ottr'- /cY L ivjcX// J���� r<� "'V � S0 , Critpria f Site No. Sheet No. 81* 02** Comments 1 57 # No Yes Prime farmland within 2 but not 1 mile 3 70 * Yes Yes Prime farmland within 3/4 mile 5 8 6 17* Yes Yes Active prime farmland in Suffolk County Agri- cultural District 01 adjacent to site 6 40 # No No? Mount Sinai arca to N/E (Sheet 40 ) and area to east should oe investigated - farmland is at the 2 mile range 8 64 6 65 # No No 12 54 at Yes Yes Nursery stock 700 ft. south; 40 acre vegetable farm is SW about 1.5 miles; within mile to the north 16 51 Yes Yes 30 acre vegetable farm to the west; areas to the east 17 17 * Yes Yes All farmland prime; horse farm adjacent to site to the west; also farmland within 3/4 mile to the North and Northeast 18 47 St Yes Yes Prime farmland within 1.5 miles; vegetable farm within a mile at North Sea 23 Yes Yes Active agricultural land within 1/4 mile, active prime farmland within 1/2 mile - site is adjacent to Rensselaer County Agricultural District N7 24 a/ Yes Yes Active prime farmland within 1/4 mile; site is T� ad- jacent to Rensselaer County Agricultural District #3. *Distance to agricultural land in production within past 5 years, if 1 mile or less. **Distance to prime agricultural land in production within past 5 years, if 2 miles or less. *Soil survey of Suffolk County, USDA-SCS in cooperation with Cornell Agricultural Experiment Station issued 4/75-- information obtained during telephone conversations with Suffolk County SWCD, and County USDA, Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service staff. At- Not Applicable; soil survey mapping completed-awaiting publication--information obtained during telephone conversation with the USDA-SCS, District Conservationist with the Rensselaer County SWCD. January 1985 CO rti MIS MIN WA -Ah't 11 Ma-5- - 1/_/ /- ---*-- 1 G� _ Peg JESC.... ION POPULAIION H11UbEHUlUS fIIIII /'L /J -'..- -411111�� �I� 11.1 RIN(It U.23 MILE(S) Ou N • - 0 11 .2 RINGS 0.50 MILES) 0 0 V/ °D/ /yf,/ / 11 .E RIN111 1.00 MILE(S) 1143 447 11.4 RINOS 2.00 M11F(S) 2175 851 11.5 RINGI 4.00 MILES) H792 338' 72- " 3D'05 " AREAS 12 SITE-17 NUMBER DESCRIPtION POPULAIION HOUSENULIIS ,,,/,frf,-/ 12.1 RING! 0.25 MILE(S) 0 0 12.2 RINGS 0.30 MILE(S) 890 328 12.3 RING! 1.00 MILE(S) 1/69 657 04 5-117i" 12.4 RINGS 2.00 MILE(S) 43131596 12.5 RINGS 4.00 MIl E(S) /999 JU172 o�7 '/� / AREA! 13 BITE-1B NUMBER DESCRIPTION POPULATION HOUSEHOLDS 7//, / 'JC, ,_,,,r/ 13.1 RING! 0.23 MILE(9) 0 0 13.2 RING! 0.30 MILE(S) 1909 699 13.3 RINGS 1.00 MILE(8) 1909 699 0 a Co 2- " 13.4 RINGS 2.00 MILES) 2553 915 7Z v2 'S3 13.5 RING! 4.00 MII..E(S) Y928 -1v07 3 AREAS 14 BITE-21 _ NUMBER DESCRIPTION POPULAIION HUUSENULUS � `�in",,.,� 14.1 RINGS 0.25 MILE(S) 315 96 4'%'y fr 14.2 RINOt 0.50 MILE(S) 7134 2321 14.2 RINGS 1.00 NILE(S) 59964 :1079 /iDB j� ,�� 'i 14.4 RINGS 2.00 NILE(!1) 22612 9639' r 14.5 RINGS 4.00 MILES) 1011543 401039 7y°07'402" AREAS 15 BITE-24 NUMBER DESCRIPTION FQFULAIIUI+ HIIUSLHULbS / ,‘ .4-,':"1 15.1 RING! 0.23 MILE(9) 0 0 / 15.2 RINGS 0.30 MILE(S) 0 0 fj-) p`S--.5' 6 i t�.� 13.3 RINGS 1.00 MILE(S) 0 0 L /, 15.4 RING: 2.00 MILE(S) 0 0 o2 y/ V. 15.3 RING: 4.00 MIIF(S) 1218 11.' } �' 16.05.28 >lorout 2967.18 ARU'Sr .26 CONNEC1 HRS LOOOED OFF AT 14.06.01 ON 2GDEC84 B 1 /�',i , �'� ,��d ,J2/ I ' / ' ' L L�'/-' Sc(S plc -?-t ) 1 . ,e. ,--i/.e 7'i n'1 Q,e ( te rz,l ed /l Porn-,a fi o va —e;47 cc •-d/.�q 5, . 7Sc.L,c74 . 41 1,,--4s-- �d F eel e+-5. 4 o r,-,Q� C r ea , s - 1tt -, /G ah ^r-/75 C a./ ha 6.Y-ei fs art_ i r, aC• C a c . I //s/st7 LEk/ i 'ni-424,±__47b,411-5 7 Phase / _ Zapae-7l7s __ _ _ _____ _ _ _ _ ?LE.FEI :five E_; /Vy_ r/_19gr _igni iCQ.rf"" 14b/f-at74' 17epc!_-/' _ ar2,i - -- I I'la f>5 in (aPpl'cah/e ) 2atin 7 , OLvrsl;.0__ Qf Fi5{L_LLYIci _____.t11¢ /,_4_ /2_, Cacr2_f- - Nzt 6, Yu7 tt ni l - v4f=mac --- I!SSP/a1 I7 ,- AIq rn &Porf ! bone -- - I -- d 30-a0 / s (a rd Park -,A 3 Cinder /s/a r1 u/- NO. 6,-,der /sAt . _ ,t// /sla .-741 -- — — -- - a q Ea5f C_ panne/ LS-�nc1 - - -- -- - - - .lu boolorj / a.-,d 02;_ .-rti- - 3 0 Par / s ssc I-- ' _- - ---Sa - :_ an_orvd/e, . m ,/(c ',u,�f ou id I -- - -- - ---- l r'►' e. radius -C h .k_ zt p) --- ----- 37_- 7, sck Th /1- Radar 17'7E_I --- -- - - - - -pine 6_,Irren5 - - - - - -- — /one- -- _ _ — -- Le - .5a - Ha - Por+ -.Z- rs.Dil__ r ha r I -_ 7 ---_ _-_ - ----__th2n_s,_ — --- -- -- - ----- - - -- — -- 6 9 — — -- sa - (-7,-,-"?t .0 n/, ,i-0( . ,-, . . I I sfu72/r7o1 7 - --- paic.b fr,ossy—h ....•-re,, --_,3-0- - j - el- -- - 1 �ao oN - - - I - -a a p/V 0 i -111 -- - - --d u pA/ b 1 1 - -- =2w,y 1 L% f\--/ - — --alio iv -_ -74 o 1 avow - I v - -- - --- -- - - a�olll ---- - Il,' - "PU0N "Th-rj.ntr -- _ req L,�.,7 N - -- _ - -- -- -- -- '� -zof0Z° A 1 T ' 1 � - • .7, ' fs!f.V/ York C to C pErtrnnt of Environmental Conte ion !. iL _ si Ly of .:LW York 17: cok , ::Y : 794 n• ry r., is illiarr CommleEloner ' May 9, 198� i Er �',�� 13� E\,‘•' MAY 13 MI Mr. William pP11 TII, Supervisor SUFFOUCCOUtZY •«n of Southold spa NO. •-n Hall ' held 11971 11 RE: J- DFTLL _ ' ear c pervisor Fell! 1 On Tuesday, May 2E, the Snlid WLste unit met vit.h S^. tl old Co+_nci loran Frank Murphy, Hioh\•'ay Euperi- te'-dent Ray Dean and i'�rold D rLPck of H7M rorpora- ion. ThF rain element of the discussion was that the landfill was in poor condition rid immediate e.ction was needed to resolve the problems of t.-'rding , gas migration, rcr-vered refuse, unorganized dumping and blowing p--,per. The- prnpo=ed septage composting project and the ccnstr•.'ction of a resde't ' -.ping transfer station Fere reviewed. These projects will :necessitate more r)ancower and e,,urF.:ment. we rcguested a methane monitoring system and more down gradient groundwater 1 wells. If the Town expands its filling operations to the south or to the new area, a double liner and leachate collection system will be reg.:ired. The feasibility of extending the fill vertically prior to c,,pping to avoid the liner issue was c'.j scussed. Enclosed is an outline detailing the elements of our discussion. We feel the Board must make a strong commitment to sound landfilling practices and plan for the future considering the increasing population of the Town. The commitment should include an adequate and competent work force to conrrol site 11 a'-cess and to operate the site well on a daily basis to eliminate crash programs. If we mov :,e of any assistance by speaking to the Board, we will be glad to do so. I 1 $-3 -:7 T• Two i The landfill will be routinely i sp-_cted by -t:- as alth. cnhitions remain as they are, we will initiate legal ar-tion. Thank you for your cooperation. Ivery truly _.ours, JWASS H. HE'7L, ?.E. IRe'i.onal Soi c =s- F n� - r 11 _ !-'.: ebp Enr. ::c: H. Eerger A. Machlin J. Maloney R. Dean 1 I I 1 I I I 1 _ '1v ' G F r T ANljr?r.L AN . =ily cover of recuse . ._lean up blowing papers . Grade area to reduce ponding . remove rubble, scrap metal, shells, excess paper bales from site . `or.niete the methane venting trench on the west :nd south perimeter . ?.scion additional ecuipment/perscrne] to the landfi'_1 July '_ . Tile 9:--u1,-*water -,oni torin^ '.ells My 1 . . ;sta'_ l t-,ree lancfi11 gas monitoring probe r,i _;ters . each cl':ster shall have ^2-moo S::'' cling : o.ints at varying aepths. Two c_ lusters shall be f-n west side of lt� betwcr•n .=cnting tre-,ch and ro:.erty line. One cl'-ster shall be on south side t,-,-teen '.crating trench and the property line. . The Town shall institute a monthly program of monitoring g s probes for % methane. . The Town shall install downgradient from the landfill beyond the existing monitoring wells a three well groundwater monitoring well cluster or other acceptable ground- analysis rocram. ay J u_.:st 31. The Tr_wn shall h ve the septage composting project J.n operation. . The Town shall subr,it a plan indicating landfilling oyer;tions for the sulsec'.:ent rGC year :any expansion of the landfill to the southeast in the current 'x a . _tion area cr expansion into adjacent properties will require the installation 11 of a cubic liner and leachate collection system. Se-te!tbe_ 30: . The T- .;n c'.='_l commence final grading, capping and closure as per the Town plan. r4YSnEC shall pro:'idc technical assistance to the Town in the evaluation of the 'use of ccm.c,^steel r. eptage as part of the final capping material. 11 r I I gC1 fl,'New York State Department of Environmental Conservation :.,_ _ HIll]il:,3 40 =tate - .:iv.•. sity of New York S� :n} - :ew York 11794E I Robert F. Flacks D - --C:or7iitaloner 11 January 31, 198 �!' ,if : 11 3 FEB 3 FIP3 :�lr. 'r:illiam Fell III, Supervisor Town of Southold ix 18PFo;r, H�..in:cR NGF$ X:in Road "j' Southold, NY 11971 IRe: LANDFILL =ear S rorvisor Pell: In conjunction with an inspection of the landfill (January 24, 1983) , we have reviewed the Part 360 Compliance Report prepared for the Town by liH2M Corporation (June 1981) . ;e request the following information: Ii. METHANE MONITORING Location and depth of existing probes, type of monitoring equipment and monitoring data. 2. GROUNDWATER MONITORING Location and depth of wells installed IIfollowing the compliance report and monitoring data since June 1981. 3. CAPPING The inspection indicated no progress in 1 shaping the fill to achieve the design grades as shown on the H2M site plan of March 1981. Final capping as per Part 360 will be required. II 4. LINER The unlined portion of the excavation should be brought to a bottom grade and lined as per the regional policy. The inspection indicated large amounts of uncovered refuse, blowing paper and debris around the employees shed. • 1 We would be glad to meet with you or Superintendent Dean to discuss the status of the operation. 11 Very truly yours, 4:-.I.4...."----V---CIX--, 11 JAMES H. HEIL Regional Solid Waste Engineer JHH:ebp I cc: A. Machlin T. Sanford J. Maloney ✓ Icam(/may,D ..•---- ___.,,J c — 0, c!�// --- --- --- --- --S 0-C.i ...._ �p o.... E asrlf a",., 124: ._.. _ -)'").n: i I31.31.rj LOCAA 0,7 .c.., •, „ . re.,rM •t fG� 12si 0 c \ `SMe,r.. .vf5i■ . e.gns1 -/N le ��dr GLS I ,o w � ..,; - :moi Sne --, P.-. l� '}��9.. .. Shon., i... . / `. , /2 � " c ..!/ f le . n � ew 20 �, - L it.�ssau ea, s - rya"eves Oa,, �u'c'`ooue w�► . 18r„uct Li qFr 8 A ( .. r . / ��_ mew Nassau P ,^, '4!F Pp,:4 9 x rnrr.rrp \ ,,,,,er Smolt Pee,nk, srpo Sc-- - � A 33 , 52 _ i- ,aTe / 19 18 soon franc BuN 28 28 . e8• l '357 M' A, a"r, p ua 'e 1 __ v,., �' ! ° �r L'ro/ 4a*� r (i F'esr ` l F 21 }- ���. • Soutn Js... FqiOW Fars a sMn 5 conic roa 28 ? ,u�6 �b S / V tions Se�. — a `,Fiance,. 4 H i o a.ns_°l1' Earn Na 3 ge / - L"pr."N• !n°ron TDrO n\, l ,;(11,u 1 .x = �` T P.M.Pon ,/ a • e 13 r . �� �Li28� warmsSagaco,gcr r re"6'irco N 8 ,� i— • 4" - • .•4j: 0 4.. -a., r..... �1 ® up e M • k• S` T. a skin Sovth�mpt0 ''•-• t t• -."7..""----8 t� �' Ag pa 4a�pa .po^�uo0v(I J r ;S �__ TS• ti k_J,; �'ea' -.._ s wenn '. -/. taw 8s V' IJeartie; AiyS .4t/as of C�vrr7mcc.,/ Gua�li/- ��S* ''n µe-«S Mr a - - _ — St, C�/k (tv an4. / I 'SCALE 1:250.00049 1 5 MILES 1 NORTH 1 teat-('G ' 'vL/ 5 /,37`-/a s- &- S U F F 0 L K COUNTY f`„y7ir,a_"1 ti II �� �_ ID NO COMMUNITY WATER SYSTEM POPULATION SOURCE ..15>',t�.-1 �Cwia.-es /9,3' Municipal Community r r_urcn7`' ' Slr t�lK Zl. II t 9evon water Corporation 1150 . wells Erent pod Water District 25812 . .welIs 3 Br agehamoton water Company 1916 . .wells 4 -ao tain kid water Company 580 . . .wells 5 Crab Meadow Beach 50 wells IIb tiu! ross Corporation ( Culross Beach) . . 104 . . .Wells 7 Dering Harbor village 130 wells 8 Dix Hid s water District 30000 . .Wells 9 East Farmingdale Water District. . . 7850 . . .Wells 11) Fishers Island Water works Corporation 250 Barlow, Middle Farms and Treasure Ponds, wells 11 Greenlawn water District 40000 . wells 12 Greenport village 6851 . .wells 13 Hampton Bays water District 9500 . . .Wells 14 Hawthorne - Maple Civic Association 50 wells 15 Herod Point Association 80 wells 16 North Shores water Company 5000. . .wells 17 Ocean Beach Village 155 Wells 18 Ree"e' Beach water Company 650. .wells in Riverhead water Districtli Dann wells 2V Roanoke water Corporation cu. Wel Is 21 Saltaire village 35. wells 22 Scott' s Beach Water Company. . . . . . 3142. . .'wells 23 5helcer Island Heights Association. . 498. . . wells 24 Shirley Water WorksII 3400. wells 25 Shorewood water Corporation 10000. . .wells 26 Soundvlew Association 236 wells 27 South Huntington water District. . .51260. . .Wells 28 Suffolk County Water Authority. . .900000. . .wells 29 Sinhiii water CorporationII 3959. wells 30 Swan Lake water Corporation 1485. . .Wells 31 Terrace-on-the-Sound 400. . .welts 32 Woodbury Triangle Corporation. . . . .800. . .Wells Non-Municipal Community 33 Aouebogue Mobile Home Court. . . . . . 120. . .Wells 34 Brookhaven National Labs 3373. . .Wells II35 Calverton Hills Owners Association 897 wells 36 Cedar Lodge Nursing Home 100. .Wells 37 Central Islip Psychiatric Center. . 4525. . .Wells 38 Crest Hall Health Related Facility 120. Wells 39 East Cl.ogue Mobile, Estates 160. . .welts 40 Good Samaritan Hospital NA wells 41 Greis Mobile Park 70 welts 42 Hampton Gateway Apartments 304. . .Wells I43 Kings Park Psychiatric Center. . . . 3100. . .Wells 44 Knox School NA Wells 45 lake Hurst Lodge Adult Home. . . . . . 57. .wells 46 Leier' s Mobile Park 350 Welts 47 Little Flower Children' s Services. . . 150. . .Wells 48 Montauk Air Force StationI 10 welts 49 Naoeague Trailer Park 78 Wells 50 Northport VA Hospital 3000. . .Wells 51 Oak Park Trailer Park. . . ; . . . 50. . .Wells 52 Oakland Ridge Mobile Park 74 Wells 53 Park Lake Rest HomeII 46 wells 54 P?aCOCk Alley 35 Wells 55 Pecon c River Trailer Park 90. . .Wells 56 Peconic view Adult Mobile Home Park. . 70. . .wells 57 P,necrest Garden Apartments. . . . . . 392. . .Wells I/ 58 Pamblewood mobile Homes 210 wells 59 Ridge Rest Home 58 Wells 60 Rocky Pont Family Housing 55. . .Wells 61 Rollin Mobile Homes 220 Wells il62 St Joseph Convent - Long Island University 1177. Wells 63 Sam A Levison Start Center 40. . .Wells 64 South Bay Adult Home 40. . .Wells 65 Southampton College 1000. . .Wells I66 Speonk Mobile Home Park 50 Wet s 67 Suffolk Developmental Center 3500. wells 68 Three Mile Harbor Trailer Park 40. . welts 69 Thurm' s Mobile Estates 450. . .wells 70 USCG Station - Moriches 23 wells � ., 71 Wes Oubicki Apartments NA. .Wells G II PAGE 78 IICOUNTY OF OF- F=OLK _‘.,..*_1---.. -!...\ _ I ,- ;�-T 7,-o IPETER F. COHALAN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE / . EPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS. M D.. M.P.H. COMMISSIONER II "MEMORANDUM I ITO: ALDO ANDREOLI . 17- .E. FROM: JAMES C. MALONEY , P . E . IDATE : AUGUST 11 , 1982 SUBJECT: SOUTHOLD TOWN LANDFILL II III have drafted a letter which I feel is acceptable with regard to an extension to the Southold landfill . On the enclosed map, II I have indicated the approximate boundaries of the planned acquisition in black. I have also indicated the location of the plot for which a well permit was denied in red. Sy Robbins stated that a definite direction of plume movement from the existing landfill has not been determined. Ground- !' water_monitoring to .the southeast at a Suffolk County recharge basin_ s.ee_map) has indicated contamination that may (or may not) be due to the landfill. 1 If plume movement is to the northeast, then the proposed addition would expand the plume impact area (should liners fail) . II feel that liners should be required where plume direction is not known or can change with time. II (71-2Wt L- JCM/lst II Atts. I/ C25 RARRO DRIVE EAST -44 .PAUGE.N Y. 1 1 Tee IA35-2D17 9 I ...CLU': 1 'i CI- ': ;_,'i i -C I K % ":-; i j, 1 DEPARTMENT CF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS. M D.. M.P.H. II . . commiss,oNER May 20, 1982 Town Board I 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 • II Geatle:en: Re: Lot Located Town of Southold Tax Map v96, Block 01, Parcel f6 A case was presented to the Board of Review on April 30, 1982 regarding the above property owned by Mrs. Pearl Taylor. IMrs. Taylor was represented at the hearing by her niece, Mrs. Susan Mason of 1050 Main Street, Riverhead, New York. Mrs. Mason indicated that her I aunt wishes to relocate on the plot in question to be close to her rela- tives, Mr. and Mrs. Janes Mason, who live on the neighboring property. II The applicant proposes an individual well; however, the property is only 8,300 square feet. Before our Board takes any further action on this par- cel, we want to be sure that the Town is fully aware of the circumstances. 11 A private well, as proposed, to serve this site is hampered by the fact that the Town landfill property is approximately 200 feet from this lot. There is a serious question as to the long-term quality of an individual well serving this property. Even if the water quality initially meets the I/ standards, future treatment in order to maintain quality standards may be needed. Problems nay also develop with further construction in this area due to the proximity of the landfill operation. Therefore, before our 11 Board renders a determination, we would appreciate clarification on the following: / II 1. Are there any plans or does the Town anticipate any extension of public water rains to the residents within the area adjacent to the landfill, since water quality in this area has been demonstrated to be of questionable qual- ' ity? 2. Are there any plans or are steps anticipated to acquire additional lands surrounding the landfill in order to insure a greater buffer area iu order 11 to mitigate surrounding homeowners from being impacted by the daily opera- • tion of the landfill? ii . . • • 914-.. '•BwO DRwE EAST MAUPPAUGE.N.Y.l 1757 • 15105143z-2917 1 I Town Board 11 Page 2 May 20, 1982 • In addition, we are forwarding for your review a copy of the survey which was made by the applicant, as well as a transcript of the hearing and a 11 copy of Tax Map v96. • An early reply would be appreciated so that we can forward our determina- tion eterm na-tion to the applicant. If needed, we would be pleased to discuss this case with you in greater detail_ Very truly yo s, • , • do Andreoli, P.E. Chairman Board of Review • 1 • I AA/j hn Attachments cc: Mr. James Mason Robert A. Villa, P.E. - 11 • • • I i . • • I �CUNI Y CFUt I Cl_K If Ser �c 11 PETER F. COHALAN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE ' :PARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARP'S. M.D.,M.P.H. COMMISSIONEa 11 March 4, 1982 II Mr. David DeRidder Associate Environmental Analyst I New Yo:k 3i-ot;: Department of Environmental Conservation S. U. N. Y. , Building =40, Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 Dear Mr. CeRidder: IIRe: Southold Town Municipal Solid Waste To Energy Facility II Mr. Davids has asked if I would respond to your letter of February 23 regarding the above. . Recognizing the experts available within your own department, I find it II interesting that you would request this department to comment on the health implication of using treated sewage effluent in the proposed cooling tower. Nevertheless, I appreciate the opportunity to comment; II however, before doing so, we would like to take advantage of your kind offer of sending to us the two volume report from the Environmental Protection Agency entitled, "Effects of Pathogenic and Toxic Materials 11 Transported Via Cooling Device Drift". • I do wish you would give further consideration to an alternate, which was suggested in previous correspondence from this department, that is IIthe use of groundwater instead of the sewage effluent.. In this particu- lar case there seem to be some obvious advantages to do so, one of which would be the elimination of the costly transmission main from the sewage treatment plant to the proposed site. Th_eTsecond is that you would be usin• 'round. . •(I • e existin• landfill . This wat er,. since it is from the plume, has little value in mink u ure water 1 supply needs;but iee ts quality would be far more attractive as a coolant than would be the average effluent from a wastewater treatment plant. • II . RAeRO OR1ve EAST •u` AUG E. •. 1170• I ]0-291 / 17 9 (`([/�_7 1 I .r. Cavid CeRidder • Page 2 March 4, 1982 We look forward to receiving further information. Sincerely yours, Aldo Andreol i , P.E. u Deputy Director Division of P,vironmental Health 1 AA/jhn cc: Albert P"achl i n, P.E. H. W. Davids , P.E. Honorable William R. Pell III James Maloney, P.E. I 1 . I I I I I l -7 II rt i' IIMEMO .O . TILE (SOHT 82-01 ) -'f - . _ FROM: H . A . DOM:BECK II _c► J DATE: JANUARY 28 , 1982 I,: II SUBJECT: MEETING TO DISCUSS CONSENT ORDER WITH THE. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LOCATION: BUILDING 40 , SUNY AT STONY BROOK II10 : 15 AM PRESENT: H . A . DO>9ECK, H2M II TONY DE COSTANZA, '.:'Sr'=r MORRIS ERUCKMAN , NYSDEC WILLIAM ?ELL, SUPERVISOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 11 LARRY '•"U?JOCK, TOWN BOARD , TOWN OF SOUTHOLD JOSEPH TOWNSEND ,TOWN BOARD , TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FRANK MURPHY, TOWN BOARD, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 11 RAY DEAN , HIGHWAY SUPERINTENDENT, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ROBERT TASKER, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ATTORNEY JOHN NICKLES, TOWN BOARD, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD IIITEMS OF .D.?sc'...S_ON: 1 . M. Bruckman reported that Joan Scherb was out sick and II could not attend. 2 . M. Bruckman reported that Southold landfill has been II declared an open dumb in accordance with RCRA due to methane problem. Leachate is a State groundwater matter. If the off-site methane migration is alleviated, then the Town of Southold landfill will be removed from the IIopen dump inventory. 3 . H. Dorrbeck requested that a consent order be negotiated II that would provide that NYSDEC remove Southold from the open dump inventory it Southold installs monitoring probes and installs a passive venting system or acquires II additional property . Bruckman agreed that above items would be required for a consent order . 4 . M. Bruckman reported that there appears to be a problem with II the definition of landfill property versus town property. He called Albany to clarify this . He reported that if the Town purchases the land, or acquires the land in another 11 manner such that access is limited, there are no structures , and the boundary is monitored , it will meet the require- ments for ownership, and if no further migration occurs , IIthat the landfill can be removed from the open dump inventory. I MEMO 70 FILE (SOHT 32-01 ) CONTINUED . . . 11 5 . M. Bruckman reported that passive venting is a trial and error procedure . At the Smithtown Montclair landfill , vents were installed 50 ' apart . He suggested that initially venting be installed at 100 ' center and if the problem is not resolved further vents be installed at 50 ' center. 6 . M. Bruckman reported that he prefers two separate consent orders , one for open dump inventory and a second for leachate . 7 . T. DeCostanza reported that listing on the open dump inventory opens the town to a citizen suit unless a consent order regulates the facility. 8 . With recard to leachate Eruckman reported that they want a monitoring system installed . Dombeck advised 11 that such a system exists , was installed by Suffolk Couhty Department of Health Services and was reported in F-2M' s Part 360 Report . Bruckman reported that off-site larchate is not correctable . Dombeck_stated _that leachate has not yet left the landfill boundaries . Bruckman stated that additional wells may bb—fequired and he will confer with J. Baler of Suffolk County Department of Health Services to determine same . 9 . M. Bruckman stated that he recognized that it is economically impossible to remove leachate pollution. All new areas at landfills require liners . Bruckman reported that Babylon has sought a variance from the liner policy. Bruckman advised Southold to wait approximately 1 month for the Babylon decision before determining if it will seek a variance. ' 10 . M. Bruckman stated that if no interference with private wells are found that no off-site requirements would be placed on the Town for water supply . Dornbeck reported no e ' e ace of off-site private well contari ation. 11 . L. Murdock questioned whether ash is inert from a resource recovery facility . Bruckman stated that metals remain in the ash and that incineration concentrates the metals . Bruckman reported that a liner would be required for ash disposal . I/ 11 qL 1 E 0 FILE (SOHT S2-01 ) C01:7: =.7D . . . 11 12 . M . Bruck-.an stated that if the State upholds its liner policy in Babylon, he expects the continuation of the liner policy. 11 13 . M. Bruckman requested sequential capping of the -landfill . 14 . M. Bruckman reported that he is understaffed , ocerates on a priority urgency and importance of the project basis . 15 . H . Dombeck stated that the `wn believed that it was not in non-compliance with it_ pre'''ic s consent order a no tnat the letter of January 5 , 1982 from Joan Scherb was inappropriate as the Town was complying with its consent order. Bruckman agreed and said that the letter »as in error and that the February 8th meeting should be considered a compliance monitoring con_=erence . 16 . Discussions ensued concerning the purchase of land or acr_istion of development rights to alleviate methane mic=a ion . _ruc.ti'.a.n rep:_ zed that if the land is secured as a buffer , access be limited, no structures , and the boundary monitored, then it will considered satisfactory and in compliance. 17 . M. Bruckman reported that the intent of RCRA is to alleviate the danger of explosion . Don-beck advised that 11 the adjacent land is utilized solely for agricultuure , it is not considered an explosive danger. 18 . H. Dombeck requested the contents of the consent order. Bruckman stated that the State would consider removal from the open dump inventory if the Town installs a methane monitoring system, acquires additional ' property or installs a passive venting system. Bruckman • reported that this should be completed no later than October 1984 . T. DeConstanza reported that the next open dump inventory listing is September of 1982 . 19 . M. Bruckman requested that Southold send a letter with a 11 copy to Joan Scherb outlining the Town ' s request for the consent order. In less than 30 days , the State will prepare the consent order and Bruckman suggested that the letter also request a postponement of the February 8th meeting until after the Babylon variance . I/ 1 - - , , ,: �, 1O _/A-.1,-,A ' .= :,- "} sr PETER F. COHALAN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE • I IEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARR'.S, M.D.. M.P.H. cQM.MIS5,0NER IIDecember 28 , 1981 i 11 • The Honorable A. Marshall Irving r' ' Administrative Law Judge IINew York Stats - ,, :-7.ent ofEc 20 1.9E1Environmental Conservation Building 40 II State University of New York Stony 31:ock, NY 11794 Dear Judge Irving : I SUBJECT : SOUTHOLD TOWN MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE TO ENERGY FACILITY 11 Enclosed please find comments from the Department of Health Services regarding the above project based on our review of the environmental impact statement submitted by the applicant. I These comments may be raceived somewhat beyond the deadline , but I believe they impact the design and some of the appurte- nances, planned for the project. 11 The enclosed material contains two reviews : the first was per- formed by the staff of the Air Pollution Control Section, and the second was done by the Bureau of Water Resources . The air I/ analysis presents some deficiencies within the EIS with regard to air pollution control and energy generation . Of primary concern is the conclusion reached that the evaporation rate from II the plant would only necessitate cooling water slightly in ex- cess of 17 ,000 gallons per day. This is a substantial reduction in the amount considered , utilizing a force main from the IIGreenport sewage treatment plant. The Bureau of Water Resources has presented hydregeological data and an analysis of the aquifer based on information on file with IIthe Department of Health Services . It is concluded that the amount of water required for cooling as stated in the original application (150 , 000 c;pd average) can be adequately supplied II from the existing landfill facility without adversely affecting any adjacent areas . Further , adequate fresh water supply for sanitary purposes is available below a clay layer located on site. FABRO DRIVE EAST -A' PFAUGE.^Y 117ed 5 435-:9I7 (O I 1 : ^.or:b1e A . :r::hall IJ1iag ' Page 2 L,.cener 28 , 1981 11 I The above analyses and conclusions should impact the financial and technical aspects of the project , and it appears that the project should be further reviewed and possibly revised. Should you have any questions on the enclosed material , please do not hesitate to contact my office . Very y trulyYours , 41[ I ,�/, / W. Davids , P. E . Director Division of Environmental Health 11 HWD/j b Enclosures (2) cc David Harris , M.D. , M.P.H. , Commissioner , SCDHS • Joseph H. Daiel , P. E. , SCDHS dames C. Maloney , P .E. , SCDHS Anthony S. Candela, P . E. , NYSDEC (w/encls) Hon . William D. Pell III , Supervisor , 11 Town of Southold (w/enols ) I •I I 1 II . 1 S i J Li�� (COUNTY OF SUFFOLK 1 PETER F. COHALAN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE IDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES IMEMORANDUM II TO : Aldo Andreoli , P .E . DATE : December 11 , 1981 FROM: Joseph H. Baier , P .E . IISUBJECT: SOUTHOLD INCINERATOR PROPOSAL IDuring the past two years a considerable amount of groundwater and geological data have been accumulated by the department for the Southold Township area. In particular, an investigation of 1 landfill plumes has started and also a study of aldicarb in groundwater around the landfill which are relevant to the proposal . The Bureau of Water Resources has reviewed the proposal--specifi- II cally on the potential of installing pumping wells at the incinerator site . • IIProposal • To construct two wells : a 4-inch, 20 gpm well and an 8-inch 175 gpm well for sanitary use and cooling water pickup, respectively, I at the Southold landfill . 17t 5p;,,, a 25. oaO. :C.D. IHydrogeology Beneath the landfill there appears to be approximately 85 ft. ± II of saturated water-table aquifer. This rests on a clay layer, which appears to be quite extensive in areal distribution and is approximately 50 ft. thick. Below the clay, at the landfill site, a second fresh water lens exists approximately 50 ft. thick. II Water Quantity IIAn analysis was made on the effect that this well would have on the water table in the surrounding area , and it was found to be II minimal (1 .0 ft.+ drawdown at landfill boundaries) . The re- quested discharge is approximately one-third of that recommended by the Suffolk County Comprehensive Water Supply Study of 1970 II ET SO'v LANE.•O BOt G I/ /` tA.l S LIP N.V. 1 1722 lll.../// ../234-2E22 • 11 Memo to A. Andreoli 2 December 11 , 1981 which limited pumpac,:e to 0 . 75 MGD . From a water quantity stand- point , this well would not dramatically affect the water supply of the area . Water Quality Leachate plumes exist below landfills , including Southold. If the quench water well were placed on the landfill site and the well screen located within the plume , the pumping would help keep the contamination from moving any further downgradient and would begin removing the leachate which would be evaporated as quench water. Water quality -ee:>>lts from the fresh waLe., below the clay layer indicate that water of satisfactory drinking quality is available in this zone. Conclusions The impact of the proposed wells to the area ' s groundwater re- sources does not appear to be significant. Water-table drawdowns are slight and will not adversely affect adjacent properties. The presence of the clay layer will preclude any upconing of salt water, and locating the quench water well in the plume will assist in cleaning up the groundwater contamination from the leachate plume . Should the facility move forward to design and construction , it is recommended that groundwater, on site, be used as the primary source of quench water, and that the 20 gpm well installed below the clay be used for sanitary purposes . 1/ . • JHB/jb Qcc: =James- Maloney4r::£:$_ 1 • 1 • 1 I 1 r c II ,r._i(.R I;M IITO: THE FILE FROM: STEVEN KRAMER IIDATE : 10/30/81 RE: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT S'i'A.iE 'i - r,':r.kGY b::VELCPMENT 11 CORPORATION III reviewed this impact statement on 10/19 and 10/20. Tn essence, the statement emphasizes the fact that rnly good c .-- c from the installation of their process at ejth,_.ld ' s ... .a ::Utility . 11 fne advantage of this prop--sed i::suallat cn would :,J :2ifically in the fact that the Town of Spin: old wo,ild utilize , -.ci:- ration in lieu of current land disposal act c: - . rho i :tor facility II would occupy six acres and will be _._:.d by a acre lined landfill. This landfill and all ,.: scci� Led c sts :, 11 Le Ussun, d by the Town of Southold. My spccif is c_. . _-nts `u.n this Jort are 11 as follows : I. Page 12 11 A. Cooling Water Option: 1. Utilization of wastewater from the Greenport STP. This II option appears satisfactory although a _piping system would have to be established to move this wastewater a distance of five to seven miles. The utilization II of wastewater would have many benefits including the evaporation of same, therefore, eliminating the need for ocean disposal . 1/ 2. Utilization of water obtained from the Long Island Sound or Peconic Bay. II a. Obvious corrosive problems associated %.:ith saline would impact heavily on mechanical parts of the system-. IIb. Establishment of a new cn-site well for cooling water purposes . Water c u _lity underlyin,t the existing Southold landfill is at least as corrosive as water II obtained from Tong island Sound or . manic Eay. Our experience with on-site wells is that it reacts • heavily on urachi::ery finishes thus discoloring and IIcorroding external parts . II. Page 30 IIA. Reference is made concernng the destruct ren of dioxin a_nd non-criteria pollutants during high temperature irciner ;t+Or ; II to efficiencies of 99 . 99% . t have been unable to find.*WW.: 10 reference to support this allc(:ation. lillir ere are no surface water bodies or ,,. rf a, -:t -r ` ci utary systems within the Immediate protect vi , '_ . . .:c .,rolecsites located approximately one mile frim teio _s t .arise �eo.s .t The Long Island Sound estuarine system 1 : es _. r , oxi m y L.500 fret -o i the north of the project site . This sys` 7 is of ' :'erendous 1 commerical , recreational , aesthetic, and '.,_stone . : lie to the region. Approximately 7500 feet to the southeast of the roo t I site is East Creek , which empties into the ' .t -h- ,- - ' .rber, yrrrt 1 of the Great Feconic -ay . This :,st,,ary , - `', e �h- c : - -.g ...d Sound, is of inestir. able value to :be 1 e - i cr . IGroundwater in the study area rar Ins in :-stir rl :-, _ fet _n ....e i excavated portions of the ro:ect site to 5 :; f--. - t.-,e h' -her undisturbed portion. This rou citer f r e�'-;.per 1 �. - , ac ial , Is the only available water supply for the area . The .� K0`hy II � t sands , which lie below the GlacI, "e - , are " c a.^y source { of potable water in the western portions of the ''curt,. :n the 1 IIfstudy area, however, the f!agothy a ':'u fer is - ;,c ,a'lty to to :sed for this purpose. For this reason , the l ` -` ted ,tater supply is one f of the primary limiting factors in determining the carrying r capacity of the area for human use and habit atic:n . 11 The importance of mai-staining good groundN _ter quality cn Long r Island has been recognioL:d by the D .S. Environ;rental protection 11 Agency , which has designated the aquifer system of Long Island as the principal source of drinking water under Section 1 =:24 (e) of the Safe Drinking Water Act (P. L. 93-523) . This designation protects the groundwater from contamination by any Federal action. There is no public water supply available in the pro ost region . 1 I { P 1 i '. II I/ i II i r II _23 , r Er--- .....tirt=t1t...._ _ __ - I _ COUNIY OF SUFFOLK PETER F. COHALAN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES MEMORANDUM II TO: THE FILE IIFROM: STEVEN KRAMER II -.ATE : 9/4/81 RCRA CRITERIA (OPEN DUMP) I On 8/27/81 a meeting was held at Southold Town Hall to inform II Southold Town officials of the findings concerning their compliance with RCRA (oepn dump) criteria. Of the eight categories within this criteria , Southold violated that criteria pertaining to II methane migration. Methane migration problems occur on the west and north side of this facility and is impacting on agricultural land currently IIused for potato cultivation. Present at this meeting were the following persons : Tony DeCostanzo, II D. Walterding (ENCON) , Ray Dean and W. Pell representing the Town. Mr. Dean, opon receipt of this information, explained that he would II contact H2M in the near future so as to provide them with the job of solving this migration problem. II SK:daf cc : W. Roberts, . P.E.: IIJ. ?Maloney, P.E. I II II 6: ETSON L/ONE P O BOX G 1 IrRAL ISLIP N Y 1 1 722 1234.2622 w York S;�te Copartment of Environment Conservation 'N' .{00.OK, �,;W ORK 11794 1- 7, �) � �GO �.� �� • rcdert F. Flacke Ccmrmssic,r,er I August 31 , 1981 I • < 11r. William R. Pell III Supervisor of Southold ain Road Southold , .:_w 'fork 11971 11 RE: CLASSIFICATION OF THE SOUTHOLD SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY Dear ::r. Pell : In accordance with Public Law 94-580, entitled "Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, " the Department of Environmental Conservation has completed the inventory of the Southold solid waste disposal facility, Under Section 4005 of Public Law 94-580, States are required to conduct an inventory of all solid waste facilities and practices to determine if those facilities are open dumps or sanitary landfills. The L'SEPA Administrator and the Bureau of Census will publish an inventory of all disposal sites in the United States which are classified as open dumps . The next submission date of open dump facilities to the Bureau of Census, for publication in the Federal Register on January 1, 1982, will be September 30, 1981. The criteria for the classification of the solid waste disposal facilities for which each site is inventoried include : ( 1) flood plains, (2) endangered species, (3) surface water, (4) ground water, (5) application to land use for the production of food-chain crops, .(6) disease, (7)' air, and (8) safety. A due process meeting was held with you on August 27, 1981, to discuss the results of the open dump inventory for the Southold landfill. - 1I 02 I r. '.tii1l R. Pell iI wn ,t S„ ahold ..;GE II .vLst 31 , 1. 81 The landfill was found to be in non-compliance on safety (explosive gases beyond the property boundary) , 40 CFR Part 273. 6. The landfill was also found to be in violation of New York Stare (oN:CRR Paet 703) , Groundwater Standards . :'io'.ation of RCRA groundwater standards (40 CFR Part 257. 3-4) is still being investigated. Eased on the above non-compliance with the Federal criteria ( published in te Federal Register, September 13, 1979, 40 CFR Part 257) the`SOUI";Gi'_ :;.fill has been classified co an ot.t_n du:,p. The results r e nnventory were discussed at the August 27, 1931 -eetin , and our files are c :oiiable for inspection by your staff. Please contact me to arrange a meeting at which a consent order to upgrade or close the landfill will be discussed. Very truly yours, � f Morris Bruckm.an, P. E. Regional Solid Waste Engr. ` /ef cc : N. Nosenchuck D. ';iddieton J. Scherb A. Machlin D. o 1 to rd ing 'a 1 one y R. C. Dean-Supt . ,TN. of Southold 11 •I 1 i 161 I r • , 1 08 2 / o 1 X i 2b. ; c r �iy7 h 3. . �— - n - - - - - — - - - - - - - - -----1 !•t -.be -- I 3 6 1 0 3 0 9 0 3 0 -__ __ - - --_ - -_ - - _ _ 1. . - - --- --J E _. 1. '— � I ll 5 2 S 17 • S 0 L• T H 0 L D LANDFILL i!I ` � I NORTH OF NORTH ROAD B E T ',. E C 0 }� AND D E POT LA NES f i IS 0 U T H O L D NY 1 1 9 71 S i- r F 0 L 1; J 41 01 - 4 5 0 7 2 30 05 I 1 9! - - 1 TOWNili ____ _ - __ ___ - - - • OF S O L TH O L D • 0 . _ 1 Pi a I N S T R E E T j SOUTHOLD• O NY 1 1 9 7 1 TT - M i• I f J I w.luf c Parks.ry V✓.rsh��„�: n DCCrcuw.Cul,lOrr C,;n!,nar�n M,-�' L,. p1IL G21J0 H6ut,lun,7•=aS Frarca E51-3t11 T vY. Tc•,rance.Co•'crn a Z„nc'1,S*,:zerienG La Jolla.C.L rna August 13 , 1981 I Mr. Dennis Wolterding New York DEC Bureau of Waste Disposal 50 Wolf Road ' Albany, NY 12233 Dear Mr. Wolterding : Enclosed are the analytical results for the ground- water samples from the solid waste facilities on Long Island. The results include : o pesticides (endrin, lindane, methoxychlor, toxaphene) o herbicides (2 , 4-D and Silvex) ' o specified trace metals o specified "wet chemistry" parameters. The following sampling codes were used : ERCO Organic N .Y. ID Lab ID ERCO Trace Metal ID -- V. Presti 22-069 51-861 Lloyd Love 22-070 51-862 Lloyd Love (duplicate) 22-071 51-863 Well #53329 (Cutchogue) 22-072 51-864 Well #68916 (Southhold) 22-073 51-865 Well #3Q (North Sea) 22-074 51-866 Well #48' 32 (North Sea) 22-075 51-867 Well #51172 (Shelter 22-076 51-868 Island) Graber Well 22-077 51-869 In addition to the pesticide compounds you requested to be analyzed, we also screen for PCBs in the same ex- tract. Please note that PCBs were found in the following samples : 11 An Equal OPPorlunrly Employer M/F 1 IDennis t-:olterdiny Aust 13 , 1981 r.' e Two 11 22-069 PCB 1254 at 0 . 1 -ppb /. 22-073 PCB 1260 at 0. 4 ppb ' 22-074 PCB 1260 at 3 . 0 ppb If you have any questions about this report, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, gx, LJd A. Dallas Wait Senior Organic Chemist ADw/pc I • i 11 •i 1 1 1 l � � 1 I July 29, 19&. 1 r, r a ymond C. �can Supe.riri er,dent of Highways ' Town of Sou:hold F econic Lane Peconic, N. V. 1V5a _Dear ? r. nran: . n inspection was conducted at your Cutchogue landfill on .Tcly 24, t9 1 . At that time, Mr. Steven Kramer of my staff performed a methane migr;tion survey at said facility. I like to inform you that methane, in high concentrations, iF ;TIL .- ting beyond site perimeters. Highest concentrations w ere noted in the potato field to the west and north of the facility; however, no methane uas noted to be migrating in a southerly direction towards occupied h >rnes. ' Please be advised that methane migration beyond site perir.ieters is a violation of } CT, ii Part 3o (b) ( 1 ) (vi). ' I v. .7,ulc, ai£ o like to call your Lttention to the fact that refuse is Fr otrud - ink.; throughout the facility and recuest that you increase the amount of cover currently being applied. Thank you for your attention to this matter. ' Very truly yours, • V. illiam C. Roberts, F. E. , Chief Bureau of Environmental Pollution Control I M " , D TO : The File FROM: Steven Kramer 1 DATE: 7/27/81 :•ETHANE : IGRATION SURVEY - SOUTHOLD LANDFILL At the request of D. t;oltentin of the NYSDEC, an updated methane gp migration survey was completed on 7/24/81. This survey confirms • 1 that methane migration in high concentrations exist beyond site perimeters on the west and north sides of this facility. The a-reas of iipact cr,.tinue to be utilized for agricultural purposes. Vegetation damage was noted approximately 100 ` from landfill perimeters. This damage is reflected in the browning of potato plant foliage. The occupied area to the south is closest to the old part of the facility and remains gas free. 1 ' SJK:daf cc: J. Maloney, P .E. CCG /-1,t..::) i / (0) DL-41t) S 1 1\( 4l L� U • 1 ?G ;, i ■ 3 0 % ' S /1. % 6-7 • C; ZE 6.7 ISL MI MI MI IMP IIIIIN MN NMI PIM MI in MB MN MI MI I a. rITIAr. . ., s s Da Le hna ly, i s Completed : 8/i2/8i All Results In : og/1 ( ppb) - Analyzed for: Reported by: fZ . Checked by: 1 Com ounds MCL � Oct . � � pLimit 22-G69 22-070 . ' 22-071 22-072 22-073 122-074 22-075 122-076' 22-1 endrin 0.2 0.02 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1 ND 1 ,,. . 4 1 I lindane • 4.0 0.4 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND methoxychlor 100 10.0 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND toxaphene 5.0 I 0.5 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1 2,4-D • • 100 I 10.0 ND 'ND ND . ND ND ND ND ND ' 1 ' I ' - IV _ ND ND ND ND ND ND ;,. 2, �i,5 TP (Silvexj 110 10.0 ND ND NCL-Maximum Contaminant Level according to Interim Primary Drinking . Water Regulations effective June 1977. Comments : . 1 Tl IIIIII INN NMI In 1 MI MI M' — NM ami am M INN IBM MI PIM 0111 r (, , , ENERGY RESOURCES CO. INC TRACE METAL ANALYSIS - Report Sheet - _ Q-19/1 ) 11 alyzed for: New York State DEC' dii ERCO RCO ORGANIC /:,"" ID ID As Ba Cd Cr Cu Fe Pb Mn Hg Ni* Se Ag ,, . -861 22-06A 6 670 <0. 5 13 2,400 580 <5 180 <0.1 280 <5 <0 . 5 -862 22-070 <5 <70 <0. 5 <4 120 140 <5 15 <0 .1 <5 <5 <0 . 5 3 : -863 22-071 <5 <70 <0. 5 <4 120 130 <5 19 <0. 1 <5 <5 <0 . 5 864 22-072 t <5 80 <0 .5 <4 150 X420) <5 35 <0 .1 <5 <5 <0 . 5 z , „ 864 22-072 <5 <70 <0. 5 <4 150 420 <5 33 , <0.1 <5 <5 <0 . 5 19,. 0 Duplicate 865 22-073 <5 <70 <0. 5 <4 13 160 <5 40 <0.1 21 <5 <0 . 5 If customer has any questions regarding analysis, refer to sample in question by its ERCO ID . *no charge for Ni analysis Sample Rcvd . 7/15/81 Reported by al- ____ Date Analysis Completed 8/3/81 Checked by VO mum mos um ' v I N UM S NM I I - Mg ORsus mum mom am min ENERGY RESOURCES CO. INC TRACE METAL ANALYSIS - Report Sheet - (pg/1 ) yzed for: Neu York State DEC . ERCO 0 ORGANIC ID As Ba Cd Cr Cu Fe Pb Mn 119 Ni Se Ay "i:,. 66 22-074 <5 990 <0. 5 <4 7 25,000 <5 8,100 <0 .1 8 <5 <0 . 5 l � 57 22-075 <5 <70 <0.5 <4 <5 1 , 700 <5 19 <0.1 <5 <5 <0 . 5 <;, i8 22-076 <5 <70 <0 . 5 <4 <5 110 <5 11 <0.1 <5 <5 <0 . 5 i . i8 22-076 <5 <70 <0 . 5 <4 <5 110 <5 11 <0 . 1 <5 <5 <0 . 5 Duplicate 9 22-077 <5 160 1 . 5 <4 <5 14, 800 <5 7,100 <0 .1 <5 <5 <0 . 5 iL, „ Blank <5 <70 <0. 5 <4 <5 <20 <5 <10 <0. 1 <5 <5 <0 . 5 <; If customer has any questions regarding analysis, refer to sample in question by its ERCO Ill . Sample Rcvd . 7/15/81 Reported by —AG& li' Date Analysis !. l Completed 8/3/81 Checked by /10 ‘1) 1 1118 2110 gill mpg 1111 1111 IlIm i 1111 VIII 1111 1011 1111 0111 0101 MI 1011 1111 1111 IIII ENERGY RESOURCES CO. INC WET CHEPIISTRY ANALYSIS - Report Sheet - Analyzed for: New York State DEC Parameter , 22-069 22-070 22-071 22-072 22-073 22-074 22-075 22-076 22-077 (1) Total organic carbon (mg/1) 260 3.0 2.0 16 35 27 26 24 14 ' (2) Chloride (mg/1) 350 24 18 29 270 52 9. 0 19 10 (3) Fluoride (mg/1) 0.22 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.21 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 (4) Color (platinum std. comp.) _220 <5 <5 <5 30 <5 5 <5 <5 (5) Odor (threshhold number) 3 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 (6) Sulfate as SO4 (mg/1) 16 5.6 2.8 97 17( 4.2 5.1 22 11 (7) Total dissolved solids (mg/1) 2600 65 68 260 151► 260 57 170 120 (8) Conductivity at 25°C (umhos/cm) 6500 110 98 450 2500 620 93 230 31u (9) pH 6.9 5.0 5.0 5.5 ' 6.4 6.2 6.4 5.5 5. 5 Sample Rcvd. 7/15/81 Date Analysis Completed 8/4/81 CA) IICOUNTY OF SUFFOLK - .'t F! 0,1.I � DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES •1EMORADUM I/ TO: JAMES C. MALONEY, P . E . DATE: : 11/14/80 IIFROM: STEVEN KRAAIER RE: SOUTHOLD LANDFILL - LANDFILLING OF OIL-SOAKED EARTH II II To keen You up-tn-date on the develr, inn*_ : concerning Southold Town ' s acceptance of oil scared earth generated by a spill which occured at Goldsmith & Tuthills Tank Farm located at Flanders, ;ew York, r have been informed by Judy Foster who inspected this II facility on 11/10/80 that two truck loads of this material did enter the landfill as condoned by Ray Dean , Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold . IThere exists a question as to why the Town of Southampton' s waste should end up in the Southold Landfill and why this waste was not IItransported to Brookhaven' s Horseblock Road Facility. I will keep you abreast of developments in this situation and have informed Mr. Robert Olsen of our reouest to be provided I with his reports and documents relating to the spill and transpor- tation of this material to Southold . I SJK: daf I/ II I. II 11 11 119 JETSON LANE • HAUPPAUGE. NEW YORK 11 787 • (5,6) 234-2622 ' OIJN1'Y ( t" :: K ,1 I C.1, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES MEMORANDUM -INTRAOFFiCE II IITO : JAMES C. MALONEY, P . E . FROM: STEVEN KRAMER 11 DATE : 11/5/80 RE: LANDFILLING OF A_SPuaT.T ::Ix AT SOUT:OLD LAN FTLL 11 II I have been informed by Mr. Robert Olsen of this department that the Town of Southold has agreed to accept a large quantitycf asphalt mix at the landfill. IIMr. Olsen described this material as a liquid of varying viscosity from a near solid to liquid . This material will he generated by the demolition of a tank farm located IIon Mattituck Inlet, Mattituck, New York. This section will have to respond to the Town of Southold II concerning ultimate disposal of this material and cur ob- jection to its being buried d at the landfill . 11 SJK: d IIcc: Morris Bruckman, P.E. II II I I/ ' J 11 JETSON LANE • MAUPPAUGE. NEW vORK 11787 . (5161 234-2622 I yew York Sate Cipartment of Enviromenta4 CDnservation +--_ 11 - HJOK, t1 'CORK 11794 516) 731-7900 11 Robert F. Flacke Commissioner I August 11, 1980 11 Mr . Raymond C . Dean (L!;4 � Superintendent of Highways A`•; =° p ^kin of Southold 11 : econic Lane econic, New York 11958 RE : TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LANDFILL - APPLICATION N0. 52-S-17 MEETING ON AUGUST 5, 1980 ATTENDEES : Paul Lappano Steve Kramer Ray Dean 11 Ray Jacobs Brij Shrivastava Dear Mr. Dean : Our disussion at the referenced meeting centered around the possibility of a draft which could be used as 11 conditions for a conditional permit. Attached is such a draft, which members at the meeting seemed agreeable with. The dates for submission are reasonable, which I feel can give ample time for their being met. If this is acceptable, please let me know in writing by September 1, 1980.- 11 As we discussed at the meeting, I could then file a negative declaration under SEQR, wait 30 days for a public comment period , and unless a hearing is necessary on technical Grounds , a permit could be issued with the conditions to which we agreed. 1 1 - 1 • .„d C . .. _an :own of Soul:hold : (3E 71 . .uuust 11 , 19%30 I I/ As regards .the exposed brush pile, this violation should be corrected as soon as possible to avoid a fire hazard . 11 If I may be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours , I )V r Paul Lappano, Asst . Sanitary Engr. PL/ef Enc . - cc : W. Bell - Supervisor B - Shrivastava, H2M Kramer, SCDHS Town Board D . Mafrici - Albany J. Baier - SCDHS I 11 I l 11 I 1 I I DRAFT SCii: :- (ME -- 11 1 . Submit report addressing all pertinent details for lining, capping, methane mr)nitoring and venting, storm drainage, leachate collection and treatment with schedule for implementation by January 30, 1981 . 1 2 . Test all private wells as recommended in 12/11/79 letter and revise groundwater monitoring locations . Based on Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services well data and private well data . Submit schedule for implementation by October 30, 1980 . JI3 . submit Quarterly progress report beginning April 1°81 . 4 . Begin Planting Plan as soon as possible . I PL/ef 8/11/80 I • I 1 I 11 I 1 1 t I/ INTEROFFICE :•1_7.. . .-M • II To : James C. Maloney , P. E. Date : Y August 8 , 1980 IIFrom: Steven J. Kramer Subject : Southold Landfill Hearing. II II IOn August 5 , 1980 a meeting - .7.1--_ -1,-,=ld of NYS =EC , Building 40, State University at Stony Brook to discuss a conditional operatincr permit for the Town of Southold Landfill, Sound Avenue, Cutchogue, New York. IIAgreed to at this meeting was the following: 11 That by January 1st , 1981 the Town of Southold Consultant, H2M Corporation, would provide New York State DEC with reports , plans and dates with respect to: $ 1. 'Lining • 2 . Capping II 3. Leachate 'collection and treatment 4. Storm drainage 5 . Groundwater monitoring. IIThat by October 30, 1980 the Town will provide NYS DEC with test information concerning groundwater and well water quality in this area. IIIncluded will be a list of contaminants, the establishing of additional monitoring wells to insure that the above requirements will be adhered to, Mr. Lapano suggested that the Town provide NYS DEC with quarterly progress " reports ; Also discussed at this meeting was the problem of blowing papers at this " site. Mr. Dean agreed to convert a leaf sucker to the purpose of removing papers from fence lines on the perimeter of the landfill. III questioned Mr. Dean concerning Shelter Island and his use of Southold Landfill sites in the near future. He indicated that he has not been ' contacted by Shelter Island Officials concerning this matter. SJK:mew II • ' ._1-i- I ; - 1.: 1 INew Ycrk State Department of Egvironnc 1'31 Conservation r pG . i0, UNY 00K , .,. INI 2 K 11794 - ._ = '_6 ) 7 '31-7900 11 Robert F. Flacke Commissioner I July L5 , 1980 II I :qr. aaymond C . Dean Supt . of Highways Town of Southold .econic Lane I econic, : e_w York 11956 RE : TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LANDFILL I.:S PECT I ON 7/10/80 Dear Mr. Dean: IOn the above date I inspected your landfill . An extremely high lift of approximately 30 feet II of uncovered brush remains in the active mining area . This is unmanageable, unsafe and may prove to be a fire hazard. This should be covered and decreased to a lift of 10 feet as soon as possible. 11 Methane gas was also detected off the landfill site on the south side in amounts of 10% gas and offsite on Ithe west side in amounts of 30% gas . I have also noticed that your not making any attempt II to stockpile the clay seam that you have encountered in the active mining area. It would be wise to take samples of this clay, and have it tested for permeability and grain size characteristics since it may be useful as , either a lining Imaterial, or a capping material. In closing, I would like to state that the brush 11 conditions should be corrected immediately and plans for the mitigation of methane migration should begin . I expect to see some improvements in a month, when I again re-inspect the site. Failure to correct these violations may result in legal action . II - 1 - I r X1,5 r . . r,ond C . _own o: SDuthold A G E T,3lv L3 , 1:80 If you have any Question, please do not hesitate to contact me . Very truly yours, te141171 I/ Paul Lap_ano, Asst. Sanitary Engr . ?J,'ef cc : rij . M . Shrivastava - H2M /Stave Kramer - SCDHS 11 Dave Mafrici - Albany Wm. Pell - Supv . -Town Board I I 11 r • t 11 I I I i few York State Department of Env onincntc l Conservation '_ 7.:Dr] . ;,, O , '.. -L:Ny i ---)‘..'-„. :C_:: �-.00K, :; 10kK _1794 II 1.61 73L-7900 ;:i_` i , Peter A. A. Berle, j i T rCommissioner I �. '- g C_., 7.7 l:3'3 ` December 11, 1979 I • =T. r ,_i II Mr . Brij M . Shrivastava Project ;anaaer Holzmacher, McLendon and Murrell , P .C . 500 Broad Hollow Road I/ Melville, New York li;46 RE : TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATION X52-S -17 II :ear Mr. Shrivastava: II As per our December 7, 1979 meeting, I would like to confirm the statements of our meeting as per the groundwater monitoring proposal in the June 1979, proposal . The report states on pg . 4 . 26 : "Existence of large amounts of soil underneath the Southold landfill provides an adequate buffer zone between the refuse fill and the ground- "' water, which presumably minimizes leachate collection or treatment system at present. Proper daily operation of the sanitary landfill controls leachate pollution . " This is not 11 the case in light of the 208 Study, Kimmel & Braids, 1975, Roberts & Sangrey, 1977 , Suffolk County Dept . of Health Sayville Study, etc. It is also agreed that the 360 report is IIdeficient as concerns preliminary monitoring is concerned. Private wells should be tested, (see attached list of constituents to test for) as well as, irrigation wells in II the N.W. direction . Also note page 7 .1 of the report, which states a north easterly groundwater flow direction while Fig . 7-1 indicates -a north westerly direction . 11 Once the testing information is gathered, perhaps a less costly monitoring system can be devised . If for example, 11 the wells tested indicate leachate contamination , they will give a good picture as to extent of the plume . If leachate is not 1 - 1 - II 11 I �--7 I .r . : ij :Ehriva5tava - .,er :. _ 79 _:cLendon and ..urre : l , .0 . 11 r7 present, perhaps they may be used as monitoring wells . Upon receipt of the analysis , a deep well will be needed (200 ' 300 ' ) . Needless to say, the Suffolk County Dept. of Health, Joe Baler , and BobV'.11.a will :apply any additional information, i . e . , previous testing results , that are available, and you should contact them directly . As far as , c ;sitte :r.oni :crings.ells are concernAri. I/ and depending on what the private X11 est a shows , the Suffolk County Dept . of Health .-.a_v :.e able no assist in the construction of wells . Sincerely yours , 11 Pc4:-ej22r14767e-mC-' Paul Lappano, I Asst . Sanitary Engr. PL/ef cc : J. Homan J. Dean . :•:aloney R . Villa J. Baler I I 11 I 11 i 5 D O.2 IT.L i :..:C` S �� �t:✓ 22 . Nitrate 2 . --7:r m 23 . Nitrite 3 . .mmcnia 24 . Phenol 4 . -.rsenic 25 . PH 11 5 . 3OD 26 . Potassium 6 . 5oron 27 . Phosphate 7 . Calcium 28 . Sodium 3 . chlorides 29 . Silver 9 . C..romi m 30 . Selenium 1 10 . Copper 31 . Specific Conductivity 11 . Color 32 . Sulfate I12 . COD 33 . Silicon II13 . Detergents 34. TOC 14. Florides 35 . Total Solids 1 15 . Hardness 36 . Zinc 16 . __on 37 . Trace Organics : 17 . Kjeldahl Nitrogen (Total) (a) chloroform II18 . Lead (b) Tetrachloroethylene 19 . Mangenese (c) 1, 1, 1, Trichlorethane II20 . Mercury (d) Vinyl chloride 21 . Nickel (e) Carbon Tetrachloride ( f) Trichloroethylene 11 I 1 1261 i `:e v York : (,a'c 1.7cp,artmen! of rnvironmonta' 'Ln ,ct .'•on - -..__._.___ I ut,ert F. Fi;ucke , Cuiluit.»lune( 1 II November 13, :579 / - . t. ( , ,--A..... II �y I Mr. Erij Schr:vastowa , P.E, r'` +� f" ':-?GLZMA(';:FP,, ;dcCLir'\'TJON & ,•SURRELL, P.C. ;079 I 1!', 17,c, Er.5 "neers ` ( =: ` 50 Ercadholiow Road J/; , c^ Melville, New York 11747 :c; Re : Town of Southold Application 52-S-17 II Dear Mr. Schrivastcwa : • II As per our review of the June 1979 report, the following information must be submitted: II Page 3.9 : Areas 2 and 3 should have groundwater depth determined by boring to demonstrate 5 ' separation for future landfill areas. The ". . . large amounts of soil underneath the Southold land- fill . . . " as per4. 9.2, is not the case from borinbs supplied. 11 Page 3. 15 : t;hile the Southold-Shelter Shelter Island 201 Study is proceeding and will eventually recommend the disposition of scavenger waste, II the current lagooning must be carried out as per 6. 1.b(3) (a) , and (c) or (d) , of the guidelines. In addition, more acceptable docking arrangements for dumping of waste should II be constructed; i.e. , concrete or macadam ramp. Schedules for lagoon operation—cleaning, filling, etc. --should be submitted. Page 4 . 30 : Methane monitoring to include placement of PVC wells for IImonitoring points. A recent inspection on 9/26/79 indicated methane readings of_207._gas along west property line. Submit location for PVC pipe location (i.e. , structures, crop lands, I/ roads) . Also, venting structures should be placed as landfill is developed; i.e. , PVC pipe, cast-concrete leaching or cess- pool rings. Illustrate location and type of materials to be II used. I/ / 5o I r11r. i .r. cr; a , P. E. ` er 13, '9 2 IPage 9. 2E: Recommendations to control blowing paper are acceptable. These should be implemented since inspection reports indicate this is a continuous problem. Planting of wind screen is also acceptable. Details for capping, l:'iing, leachate treatment disposal, and storm drainage, as per 9/ 10/79 correspondence, should be submitted as part of the application. Table E-2 footnote (a) mentions ". . .envirrrT,ental protection measures . " es this include liners and leachat, regard to groundwater monitoring, I look forward to .our 11/20/79 eeting at ;0:00 a .m. to discuss particulars, as well as the recommendations in the report. Sincerely yours, ": e/L,41/ <r-- Paul Lappano Assistant Sanitary Engineer PL:va 11 - cc : Raymond C. Dean, Superintendent of Highways Philip Earbato James a to ley Joseph Sa ier 1 • 1 1 - . i I/ (=vU ;‘,: I ' (-1= �1j 1- I- (:1_K C ae w r ` n s I DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES I/ TO : Robert Olsen Date: October 26, 1979 II FROM: Steven J. Kramer SUBJECT : Southold Landfill II II On October 18 , 1979 , I inspected the Southold landfill , with the intention of following up your indication that 55 .gallon drums were in fact being stock piled at this facility. The only drums on site, II were these located adjacent to the 275 gallon tank the Town utilizes- for waste oil containment. The 55 gallon drums are used for overflow purposes . The location of these drums is immediately to the north of the shanty on premises . 11 Please advise me if we are not talking about the same thing. Thanks for your help. 1 SJK: sp II 1 il i . . 1 i 1 1 1 SET SON LANE HAUPPAUGE. NEW YORK 117!7 . (St 6I 23c 2622 J 3�- 1 1 1 I 70: Dennis moran, Health Services Date : October 15, 1979 FROM: Steven J. Kramer ' SUHJ^CT: So,told Landfill L Would you kind= t� the test %:•ells located immediately south of the So it_ini_d 1�n;1fii1 locate_ So or ,s{ b` P - --01t. - 47:.: onInd Avenue, Cutchocue, New York fthe r�e.J .lta cif this: ,nts I/ . t.st:inoL i, 11 ,r;G. r and �appi�, t t} Thank you fc,r your cOO trF,t_nr in ttlis i lHt_r. 1 I 1 i 1 i i i 1 � -...- - X33 k . I - \ r. 1 n :' , ..rt . -_' tiUi 1=r-b. iturlill,_ .i�;+, -•,15cry,-Wim ,i... - .\ IJ r 1.:C. f.� _ ._ _ „_ i *C..-•ti'�i' I _ l *� .J ' -. \a1.� I rolrr A. ^, Follr, I • �ept€- -.l-,er 10, 1('79 I :Th..) . 1.:_- i i o .i ; o i i , :: u, -J1-1; 11971 -_ nr - .:,,_:1)Z :: I :, _tac.:;ed are copies of our :?eyional Solid Waste r'._., mc ?art 360 Leachate Attenuation and Liner IIPolicy , :'_UL) . CJrrent hrdroceolog ical information locates t: e lnd :_1_ 7.o:e I'.%, and condition two of the Solid Waste I 1'G_ `_. :, i _es . ^ 'hs the al7orox,jriately 14 ices rerriaininc zc 'o _iir_'rs and the entire la ndiill capped �;- =•• =: - 1=' . :,:.!r condition four of the Solid Waste la n= c�nd specifications for lining , storm drainacje, ca;.- in::: _ltd leachate treatment as per P360L must be submitted IIas part of the application. If I ;.-gay be of any assistance, please do not 11 hesi-.a:e to contact me or Paul Lappano. Sincerely yours, Morris P ac};rl:!n , P.:l . _ Reyicnal Solid ,taste Engr. cc : 3 . ' ._ �eaton 2ean/: l rlci _.:_ : :s _ava - H2:1 X34 1 �!lJ N 1 \l 0 i -: t_1 1 - (-J I _ 7 IDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES II II August 13 , 1979 11 Mr . Paul Laapano Asst. Sanitary Engineer New York State repartment of 1 Envircnental Conservation Building 40 State University of New York IIStony Brook , NY 11794 D`2ar I.,r. Lappano : 1 SUBJECT: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LANDFILL This is in response to your request for comments on the 1 recently submitted Solid Waste Management Report for the Town of Southold. The monitoring proposed in the report basically complies with existing Part 360 of the State Environmental 1 Code . However, because of the unique Long Island ground water situation and the fact that it is the sole source of drinking water for the County residents , a much more elaborate monitor- 1 ing network is necessary to properly define areas of contamination . A monitoring network of this type will be expensive to install and take time to complete. Before making specific recommenda- II tions with regard to this landfill, I believe it is in the interest of the residents of the Town of Southold that the fol- lowing information be provided: 1. direction of ground water; I2 . theoretical size of leachate plume ; 3 . location of any private and public supply wells that are downgradient of the landfill . IIWith the above information several cost-effective alternatives may then be open to the town: IIa) provide public water; 1 _TSON LANE • HAUPPAUGE, NEW YOPK 11747 • (516) 234.2622 135 0 ce 2 11 7ucust 13 , 1379 • b) -utilize private wells for the monitoring :system; c) restrict development and use of ground water down- gradient of the landfill ; d) determine water quality downgradient of the landfill 11 by sampling public and private wells . From an aerial of the Southold landfill and its theoretical leachate plume , it appears that only a few farm residents will be impacted by the plume . Sampling of their drinking water should commence as soon as possible to determine if contamina- tion from the suspected leachate plume has occurred . It may develop that no wells are affected , in which case the minimum Part 360 regulations could be considered . Conversely, private wells could be affected by leachate, . nd public supply would have to be provided . Regardless of the case , contamina- tion of the water supply is taking place , and any protection of the water being consumed by the residents should be of the highest priority. Some of the information mentioned above is already available at our office (nos . 1 and 2 above) . I suggest that your office , the Town ' s consultant and my office meet to discuss the matter. Very ruly yours , se, i 1-LBaier , P .E . , Chief resh Water Monitoring Unit I JHB/jb cc Mr. James Maloney Mr. Robert Villa • 1 I V' 1 i 1 I 1 I 11 I 71 : T:ul La:�_�.�no, , st. Sanitary :nJineer P my 24, 1979 FRO'S: Janes C. Maloney, P . E. RE: Solid waste ':anace--,ent Plan and Report 11 Town of Southold I I have reviewed the above referenced repor . The document a,?dresses all of the Points necessary for com liance with reo•uirc eats for a permit to operate a solid waste disposal facility. There are a nu. er of points and statements made in the re- port to which I take exception, or question. Of these points, five should he addressed: 1. Although a need for nethane monitoring program was indicated, ao such Pror an was outlined within the report; at the least, a recommendation for methane monitor locations on the periphery of the landfill should have been made. 2. It was stated that it may be necessary to maintain gas venting structures for five years. Plans should be rade to monitor methane migration for a period of longer than five years because certain studies have shown that methane can be generated for as long as fifty years. 3 . It is a Part 360 requirement that refuse is not to i be placed to a depth to which the separation distance between groundwater and the refuse is less than five feet. Soil borings A, B and C indicate that the greatest distance between placed refuse and ground- , water is 3' and that the minimum distance was 1. 5' . Care should be taken that refuse not be placed within 5' of the hichest recorded groundwater elevation. ' 4 . It is indicated on Page 7 . 1 that groundwater flows in a northeasterly direction. However, Figure f7-1 indi- cates that groundwater flow is in_the northwesterly direction and places groundwater monitoring wells accordingly. Although I am sure this•: i:= -an oversight, correction to the report should be m-de i^i-�ediately. /3 ") A • ;� ::: "..."1 •• +� -'..t617.."... 5-...: 4'1Vt1S-" 1 w -• r • ,--4-i. h v�• •�• {,t•- _ •'`_tet -,.'„-•-;-•'•1•L-_ l - f ` • I • 4�11'Ki(.0,,' �t•.W`„/.irt - ` J!S.'Ui6r .1 a•. � .s a I • F Y• •- • I • I rtkilt..1 • II 111 I • I/ I IgaLSLTT AN 'atT?ITa;, I Pec k MOTTO;? p'0., p c.c (TTalln;i I T,. , -a•d X"ac=oc •x •a •d 'S acoe •, •x •3 •d 'sPTAVG •r •d i;,J I • I 4; : :f • I �, moo •.cT3; ? as pa�� ,�c-:s a i Tut-. I s ��- ST: •Loi;eooT L'.ia..;4 pu2 sTTo:. Luc ;o Z�c;..:-'... a4, o.4 su AoFn:,or2 zo; -4'.,-�,_1 :__-,p S.. yT ;o .70727 •.z;: . 7,.., --J'A S uoag 4;2.r. ;c'� s -':; ;.O(- - o _ I I I ✓ -, 1 / r • 'r . ''''T;( �. ,.1 .•;; .!I , i .., ;' . . ,I. :I C,-'I„i?rvalloflI / I, •. P,-.:or A. A, Rory, Cthinnis s inner I .July 20, 1y79 I '.. . . :anK c^i , r. ,1111 L.... . - : �l,�'a . -. _r ati .m ;,uvi .5ory roil �,:LtLold , _w Von; 11971 - - - _ r ..sKI : I .... ,r ,,,tter of my 11, , .' ;? ru !:r. R. a e of this o artilant i.as been ..or,.tar ec to this c'ffice for response . ' 7art 215 of Title o of the : ..,..-.4 r..; State Coles , u :es and n..:guiations ror ibits open burning of rubbish rated by residential acts . ties in any to.-n %.• ; tin total t-, ,•:n population, incl,Hing incorporated or unincorporated areas . cf. Nater th-,,:n 20, 000. .',s 7,t. iation of the Te1;n of Southold is :n excess of this . ..,,,Jer, the ,. . c., :r; c :on is acpi :cab :e within the Town. S';bsection 215 . 3(a) of the sa-oe rec'ilation, allows far the restricted I burning of land clearing and/or ,ie^•cliticn .r;aterials , provided that such rn :nc :sone in arcc•r.'iance with ? : . : _!:,ed .7 t.'l :s feoartr;ent, after : . _ i Lat . on. Since ti e 5'... :a.. ? = tot of Health Services I . s an 'c,r i.art _nt . s ` .r. . ; . . -:as of this e :a re d • rocted to r;r c-. es rev 'f t'laC enc': for a permit appi ' cat ion. ':r. ::aloney' s office :s the sole aeric•: within Suffolk County vinic n has Jcen delegated the authority to issue ;cerroits to ccnduct open I burning in the County. This permit issuing authority cannot bP delegated to the Soatr,oid Town Conservation ndviscry Council, as you have requested. I if I -ay be of further assistance rocard :ns this :natter, please feel free to contact me . I ','era• trulyou } rs , ,, 7/7_/'.6../.1.--1' LY-7 '--4-?.2.( 72 / ,, I / Ro`.,ert U . Scnrieck, P. E. Senior Sanitary Engineer Ic : ..a cc : R. Capp R. :;& ,e I _5 . 'a l.,,ne y, -= (;3 Jetson Lane, 11auppauoe , 1:.i. 11787 I , . ILT- ! r ,K r. ', . T h r I ,SF L V I ,RV lv TH L J JNS L F.LA i . SII l tic. ", ttc•t oLi the AF_£,Lged ✓c.ui :l ;ic ,: j P.i.tt 360 o6 Tt-tte 6 op the Cedes , -u.Ces . and R, cutatic,is o6 the State c6 '�c,w Vut�Z, • ORDER ON CONSENT I by .• • TOWN OF SOUTNOLO FILE VO. 1 - 0369 • • Sujcl_F C.'u;itiy) Rcs .den-t X 1 al1eLes that it 1 'L'NE,:C.,:,S , the Dcpatt� .cnti/has -,'d . a t-ccus vcct'a-tio►is 6 Pat 360 c6 6 'vVCRR; and HEREAS , tiie Res ;?cinccnt ;: as •:'ai : :a , ::.s ,'IL-.ht to a public I ,ca-t.(.ii ( n this ma `e. A - a 9 �ti� in e ._,;;,�. t ��ca� d b, � .ct�, d I:avi,iG consented to the C55Li.Llia and c.•=teti_ny 5 tees to be bound by the .teims viete-Lii; NOW, having co►iside-ted this ,^atte - and bcinc, duty advised, it is ORDERED, the Respondent shaZt s .tn-ictC,i ccmp.iy with the teams and conditions set Sett(' in .the ca;r•pc-ia ice schedute, known Ias Schedu.i e A, attached hereto and ;rade a ; at.t he,cob; and it .is unthen CROERED, thax :'.'.(..th iespect oI. c a „ � sCd •sic, atio►: , trie. e II ( h heteb j -(oTos ed upon Resp; ndent, a 1:`nat.t:' in the sum c6 One : Thousand ( $ 1 , 000 ) Dottan.s . said 6%nc to be , uspendcd 4_ 6 Respondent complies stt.ietty w....th the -tcn.ms and cc•iid.it.iona set 6on.th in said i SeheduPe A; and it id 6u4thet • , ORDERED, that whenever .the Reg-i.ona.E Eng.ineen Son. Env.i.ton- IImentai Qua.�.ity dee►n4 it necessary or des�.nab1c to i,:s ;�ect -the p.tem.ises o6 Respondent .to ver.i6y pnogtesa .i.n ach..evina compliance £n connection henew.ith , he on his neptesentative shaU be ai.towed to ac upon such p,temises at any teasonab.e bout and sliatC. be aiven I Such assistance by Respondent as -i5 ,iccessa'Lil Sen the p,cpen con- duct o6 .such an -inspection; and it cs Su•tthen ORDERED, that this Ondet shaft be b-indtna on Respondent, cls successc'ta and assigns and aft pensc'ns , ,“ tins and conpckat-_cns H acting under on. eot it,, -i.nctud-i.►ic , but net Cimited to those who may ca-tc' ,ti; ,: any on a�.Q oS the cpe,--Lar' cn5 ;: ,?pi boina conducted by II Respondent, i-:hethet at the present £ocat-icn on at any other .in -this State; and it is 6 unth en II ORCERED, that in -those .instances in whish the Respondent " des.i.tes that any 06 the pncvisions , tontms and conditions 06 this I 14 I - :: , ; '.'4, ,_t , ti `c , , tl.l i t• r' 1 r1 :� 1 ;, c - :a it 8 . / 1 .. . t ' 1 k� I 1 / ljjW ORDERED, Ilia t aiiCl Liar' �`� Oce';'ie F �' ct`CVe , except c ge : rt tiriLh C12 1ha�Q :Ct F ^ad J„ e OAC ,_.—L� `-` L. il 1-rlC Cc'1nm.cah•c0ite�e�� S ��PC � ��! � �C t�I s t � t'a.tit D� ,'-'.`C,;~.t ell I "'C ;1 a , sUcli a'.'L-C1.� r.;t C CQC,_ being r';CLd nut: ap1J.Qica.t.Con o5 the Re.spo;tden-t Ok upon .the Cemm.C4 - 5, c.c..;iet ,s cL,in “ndi ga . I ✓.2tEd : 'Albany, NrelU V o•‘1 I.: _5-7 1979 II OSERT F. F LACKS Cominc.haioiie:t c 5 Erty , c.toitmei.iae Cenaetvatcon 7 /I f/ / / Ji;NACD ... ,,;i !„- DLE;J,,,I _--� Regic;ial :'itCcton C` .NSE;.'T EY RESPONDENT Re.spodent ack►towledge.s the au.thc tt.ty and u',. 1 :the C ))�i` i.s siCnepi. o �j C _ State C.(te0o 05 Eitvc .t ';i,; . al Curls t, i�(e fU �'/C�/t I2 to -(..s a LL e the 6 o�(. r. .l'C.,t ti C i i C' 5 1 I i e C 1.a t e p \Itlte-t 1Jfaoceediiioa egc•i.ng C Aden., et'a�.vcs public /Leaning n .th.La matte-t, accapta the to-Lma and cond.C.t�.ona ',3 et 5o tilt in the O'Lden and con6en-Ls to the ih.5uance tlie-teo6 . I TOWN OF SOUTHCLD I By ((e--/:,e/ ----;7 ..1-..(-- //GC �� /7 I 11 'STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) � � • I .� i On .the , came ,,-/c: 1 �,� dayfe5 c .F?!� 1979 , be6ohe ^'c pc-tsei:a £y hC�rO•tn, de JCa ) ..0 me kiloton, ;,:11c, L'c.4. 1.(.1 '�UCU 1 ed and ,said that he kesidea at (, c.--: - It a z It e a tike i+'E'�., j c < Sout 05 t that he executed t!t the T .' c r; .5 ltoLd and e � c',`cegc.cng conaen.t 5c ;. and on .. chal5 o5 'said Town, with 5uiU au.thc-tity ,so .to do. j c ITo : Hon. A . "at.tcccliia _ _ _ C'fl'it C ^ Sc'utlicld '� • ,t L.' . _ , i', - /, 53095 !.fain Road SLY FU51IC Southold, N. Y. 11971P/Dill-4 T. 77 r„Zv Nn':^' is ..,• (; % Coon ( ,�,i.0-.. :3 ( - ;� r.i.,,�h . , : f /4 - Ii 1 v W,V r I n L On c)-'L be6o-te May 7 , 1979 Resl)onden.t .sha.e.e. make avaiCab.Ce 100 ud' as a coven. .s-tock piZe on ,the Za,idsiZZing a-tea p.tope&. rEy Jc. ly 10 , 7979 , Re• 1 c' denti 5ha.ee subm.t.t an Engi_nee•tt i gig Repo t.t .to .the Depah.tmen.t, which ' addke66ea the quea-tion o.6 .the Pan.-t , 360 hequi'temen-t6 and how .they ane .to be handfed. _ .t c `c e 70 , 7979 A CCmp.Z4ancc meni-.c'-'u ng con/ie-tence 44.4:Z be h e.e.c, at ti h e c 6.e e ee o6 the DCpa.ttimen.t o6 EnvirLoumen.ta.e. Con-set ' va.tion .to - erit„i_nC 4. 6 the TCcen :hias met the .te,1,, and eendk.t-ccne c6 .the Comp.e.eance scheduQe, Sehedu!e A . 11 1 •1 1 • 1 1 1 1 I • i.;_vr York 5',,`e C ?r>>rr,,i.-:-;t o C„,;,�nrr,Ln;::i (Thrserv.::ion , '..4 !rl A. .'t. i;l'fR', IL. .uu7:S S iOtict II ,Lrch 22 , 19./8 11 . _I ^.a .7crid Lean I = tin men 2ent cf Highways own Of Southold :... i:- ad I _.:o _..+ , _.Cw Yorl: 1 1 / 1 RE . SCi' 1i: l;/.= h'i ','',N.;:,:. ,. :cT PERS:i'r 1 ! APt'LIC •.TION NC . 52 -S-17 Lear ;:r. Lcan : 11 .._t::oug:7 it is understood that t:.e Tok°r1 of Southold %,-ill s._.:-...mit a :,ore detailed Solid Waste Facility Il .:r, `conforr:,ing to the gui6elirles and until doing so, the . 1,,-llicatic:l is ii:c•or1-`e , reel it is G..J.. c7: lute to highlicht what the final plan should contain . 11 �1 ) . :ian fo r�cnitoring c rou.c\•:atc r , .:A oand do' gradientofthe landfill. I The monitoring should conform to Section 3 . 3 Criteria, and incl,1%3e baseline, and routine water sample Ianalysis . . A detailed plan for -.ethane monitoring and control. 11 ) . A final site and land 'use plan rc, :lecting the requirements of Sections 3 . 1 .0 and I3 . 2 .C. I 1 X44 I • I _ 11 II 4) . :n roaard to your -:poiication to operate, have a specific ouestion, regarding the i-^erv_cs liner manticned in Item 20 . 11 Is this liner nature: _ or man-I:lade? In either case describe ` ,e aterial in the liner. IISincerely yours , l / / Paul Lop^ano ?.sst. . anitary =i--;,:r. II .7.-1/ f ICC : JPaul Grosser, SCDH :.:r. John Towers , H2M II II II I II 11 I t I II /4 : 2 , l':; 3 r= }T.or.d 2-2an s,arintend&nt of Highways 'o,...m of Southold :a in -oad outhold , ^:&,./ '_oris 11971 _.'.C: ..._�.._ -_.._.._-.:..`., �....-. = I1 T -.`EED -LETTER. of 1:7 i __ 1- _ -• _ tr.at __ C of E.7.-11rntLI Act rntaot ( 516) _ _.._ . P.-.UL L1,P?. !cO 77 -793J 2 , I I r. : Tate : ij l l / 7i 2� bjrct : Southold To ,.,n Landfill Enclosed herewith please find copies of all my correspondence with the Town of Southold concerning their landfill . The following is a chronlogival reporting of events of therecent months . : 11 1 ) I conddcted an inspection on 4/ 1 / 77 . Piles of potatoes near the scaveng aggons were infested with flys . Also , the area near the north fence where shells -ere piled was also infested with flys . 2 ) I conducted an inspection on 5/20/ 77 . The situation with theflys near the scavenger lagoons had deteriorated , even though the equipment with ,ihich to remedy the situation was sitting at the site- -namely , a large Jayloader with landfill tires . I advised Mr . Dean on 5/23/ 77 that the situation should be corredted as soon as possible . 2 ) A reinspection on 5/ 27/77 showed no imptovement in the fly situation except that the potaotes , she ; ls , and dead fish had been - pushed around the bulldozer . The odor at that time was incredible and very widespread A telephone conference with Mr . Dean revealed that his machine was being overhauled in Harrison , NY and that his backup machine had a " blown" engine It 4 ) A reinspection of the premises by Bill Amberman the week of June 6 revealed no change in the situation . 5) I conducted an inspection on 6/ 16/77 . The situation remained pretty much unchanged , except that the bulldozer had managed to compact some of the refuse near the scavenger pit . 6 ) A reinspection of the premises on 7/77/7 revealed that the situation had improved slightly . The area just east of the scavemnger pit had =ome cover on it , but the household area east of teh attendant ' s hut 4'as still uncovered . In a telephone conference with Mr . Dean on that if0FoiWO afternoon , I learned that the machine will be returned to *hem on July 15 . Mr . Dean also promised to attempt to get some cover 11 ;) n that uncovered area during the week of 7/11 /77 . I • I t i l �r I I I/ December 22 , 1976 N The Honorable Albert M. Martocchia Supervisor, Town of Southold 16 South Street Greenport, 1Y 11944 Dear Mr. MartoccL is: I am in receipt of your letter of December 9 , 1976 concerning aperoval of the cost to install methane monitoring wells (S50 p=.r well) around Southold lanc.Ifi j '_ cite. ;ss per the i;olzmucier findings, we agree that a _monitoring system is necessary. Such a pro:;ram shoulc: commence with the installation of a gas well monitoring system and the sub- sequent r;:onitoring of t:,e wells on a routine basis. At the present time, the Department of Environmental Control feels that a network of wells spaced approximately 300 ft. on center is a sufficient methane ge:s monitoring system. I have enclosed a map ohowing the tentative locations of 15 1 wells. The wells can be installed as soon as the town receives the materials (also enclosed please find a list of materials needed and suggested suppliers) . 11 When the well installation is complete, a monitoring program must be instituted. To accomplish this , it is recommended 11 that the town investigate using a methane gas detection meter. Further information on this meter can be obtained by calling Mr. John Soderberg (234-2622, Ext. 252) of this de- partment's Air Pollution Control Section. Please advise me as soon as you have the well materials on hand so we may commence with installation. If you require 11 additional information, please contact me. Very truly yours, 11 Richard Markel , P.E. Asst. Sanitary Engineer P /jb Lnclosures (2) cc Mr. Morris Eruckman, P.E. , NYSDEC Mr. John Soderberg, P.E. , SCDEC — 11I I .., I 1 . - - ..- - '1 ., : /,--- , ., I ) . , - -- - C a---- • -- -. • . - _ —-- -•, • - - . . . ..-- _ '--- ----,-------- • - -I '-- _-_-- - - - \' -,• :. •\ , ----. ,.. _- - - , _ ' - -.- , \. _,.. - /,._ , 2 -. , --- • r), ,.., ,, .__ ,. .. . • a.: (, \ ‘. - . ' I Ci 0-, ; ' _ .---",,_,,--________- -- _ .- ----', ', \ ', \ • \ ,, \ I . -r r.,._„. - ( c,„„----c \ :: P° ' -' -\ ,..., - - • !'t , \ , •, ,,,,_ \ i'---N -_..., r I 1 .,' i • .\\..-. ; ' , ' / • \ _____.--, ', -:. \ ' t2z r_ ,,--• \ _ i ,,e . , , - _._,• . ,— - --))/ --1 ",`\\ _..._ , . •, __: _,... ... .., —, ---.....,, \ . _ - ‘ \„\\ ____, ,, \\ -\\. _ . __•• , , " \ - -• - ., ', \_.• ,. , . --- / /,/,/\ / `. ‘ - \ \\ , . ' r•'• ‘,/-"NJ \ ' - • • ‘ . ‘`-.I‘. \ /---'s•. . •----• ---:\ --, - .,/ , \ ' • ''' ,-.__ '"--...‘, ;t . ---,- . —- 7----. _ , . I -.... --..„,. \ ' '"-----.. ... ...................,.......\::._ ,_ • • $ • ,---.. ---- . / 11/ • \' :' „- , .7, • \ i -----.„... ,) ( (--„__ , . ) . ...• •-• \ - \-? __--', i . - ____--- - l 12. - -- ,• . ,-- • 2 ( , .____, / .,/ , •;: ) • , ' v ; , ', ------ - -------- , • .. . , ,,' __.... ,,, ,/,..) •,„ . t , / , sN / ,'., „ .' ---, "- „,, ___, .... ,.- • \ ' j / ___/ _ ,,,,.....-' . I , 1 / . , ',,../-- i ' ' , Y / 'I—. • . -.I , , , . -\--._N- . • 4‘,_ ..../r ,';'-'-'----*/ -7// ' - /- , / - . , /"/ I . I • , , , • k \I , , ....... __- , t , I • \ I ,.__, _ !-.7.1 __" ' 1 --..-\\...." / ' • .. ... 13.,.;\ • . , .• _ • r . / /- ,' - - r- - i • - ,. , --.. -- 1_ :„77.2,-.. - _. \._..;,--- , ,, i \ , \ / - \I , / ., ______s.....,....!\ z...., ,r. i \ . ' ' 4 • '' / ....,"-- \ •.•I - 5 ., ,t • . --'.__ .. _ ---- , / '/ / ---...\ \. '22 -.-..--•."7---= 4,‘'s• i/ ., . • ..., I wari --\\,_,,.....N.:\r\ • A ,-...., I • ‘-- III'• • \ . , \ / •:. r . I `:c , \ \ • \ . ye /". -,-'\., ...,-1-' ' C.-)fr .- n • \..... ,', , .-.. \ Ss, \ \\\ r, . •70 . \ .' ...."." • 1 5. '7' '' ''''..\,'' ' , \ \ U e'l ' r%\\ / ''1 :4 ‘\\ •,e ,_ ' j \. .. \ \ /'/ ,,"' .-""-..- _, -, -••‘, \ \ , -.../ \ , • ...." /..• . -- ...- ..---1 ' , • , . ,... _____77 • .:' --,- I • -.."" ..., .... , ' ‘ . • • .../'.C.; -... ... .,'..^. C••' • ‘ ...,....1 \ ' -•'''''./-n.• • ....' -1-- ,`‘ ETHCL H OE) L /—,1 J _. . I ; I (....•:.;;. c-. '' ''' ( CI -,,, ...'....- ' . , '-, . 17 I L-L 1 SITE: /49' IIIIII 111111 11111 *III Mt MINI 11111111, gill )1111111 SAS al. ANN Alt VII lie pla SS IMO IPINI . ,:. ki Perunic • • );\ r 56 / ,5 < • ie tY u (7., ' � .% Z2/ / / Duck Pond "�V ��� '� I , 40 x "' 7 ,7 P/ipl �" / / , /0 -- ti /' 4/. '/' /13, •••-•"ai /S: 9 .' J� rr I his "�o ��/ t y�'P 1 ;. J J ' , • / . l ,J S6,1. I b� . S? ',• o 1 / • 2 GS•r 'F • c < V' ' 7---- ‘,..",> ",.",. ' : 7/, '.,-" °----s.,.----J \' "::.. r .''''...'kk <'''. . ,.. ,, • / _� rL��l ISO ����A 56 1/ l �, i 7 p -c �� **' , \ 0. \.p , ° , . C Sat 1JLi lO 33, 4).`/- u,�F I r l , \ +„ l '�� • V� ��� )„1, ��� IA •• • NIc' s ��,k�� a1 y� 1> VA 11 z • *East t• 1 °� + \ Fre HeKrne • < o p — , Ailk. i� \ , ` / Xi(f3,-lde ,Nd, 1,1 44)aU ° I ) i '1,1 t). \ J, \\\`. \ O X•57 \,'' / (N ... \✓ H '`-Golf E Cie No /�4 `.� I • ' • .•t �' ilk 1•� i+ �i / �� 7 ! PP Qr /l �C�t X1/7 1 •)1 1 1 4 . 1 / Ir/ t y' Off :vinic c JI gi, •44. \ v \ < ••��� •o s (p UQYI�OJ��C �No U/�.�U,l l�t't�11\oma \C "tatogue Sta <s l 3° �` i'� �� .. .; ' --1— 9 Rb ' 1 o. + A br2.1►?i t ua te,' /r/.. , . Sacred r ''''''',',..,1• I y r' \. • Nerd � (:)-- \ (� I I •�•' v Ni- ; \ •• zs s_`",p t ) z 1 ' •o • I• � SI 1 .•%. , -\ , , i , i :i , ,)c k ' o/ 1e • �� J Cutchogue — ,` r ; , p U T H U' •.ii � I I Sch. i, A�G �. •.r 1 r a F Il• i ,\ yN. 77 i., P '� •.I or Waterville v • _' 1 \ I t Cutchogtte„ . T,-7 \ • .�` Ns ,V s PO •• I • 4.4„ ..) Ul tc \ tic) '\ O� a • t 1 �L 6M 32, •• • 20 n. r� �1 ) j 1. •• \ •`-0 I I • •*q • • r gut • 1 p •�•. -) :••.1---‘1.s. 1 U I �'/i �"• • 1,11 �` • • 1� N. 'Culcdo � �e f' • a '� •2a � \, \\0 1 „ 1 I 1 f ,. ,i y,l, r. • ('1l (c') •0 • 'of. ;�' ~ //u on um out on an ono .on OwAi= almi - ANII Min- so (=on ( -;A. ,Av;4. . ... 1 1 . d ,• N\ 14, Duck Pond Pt • .,.. die - ,,,..„ -...--, . 1.. 1 . 4filip„..V. ,: .. , e. ,J.*• .,, ,,. ___, ife 7 811a. 4. i \,4 • ' • \f'1., leiji ri- , , .# \ !ki.' • I. • , I. ... .-, - . ..„,,, .,,,,, , ,.. ,di ..., / Vv. • I 4 ,,, •;*A* , i' •ca"-1, 7i' • ' . ,f;','..'''4.:',-`..":et 4-,, V'''-' .1I 6164 / , •• „F ,.. .. ., . . --,..41„17L-.....614,4*.., 4 '.' .'.''' ......gr:'• t'144:14."ii,4 ::''. <) `,:''ci'' • irroz. Avr- , f4:- *,,,, .. ' • ! ' % , t '.40- P.N42: '--'.1 ,.'', ' '.44, . - , \\•-s , I . : ......:';:-Cr'• :II:. .. 4; .:-;,''''.! ...!. ,?•i, lei .,: ','•'• _4'i'•;,:.1... ,;';:,..i. - - a, . • sr, .'• , .4. ,f•1 t. / i • .44410, .1 ,,,•,o-• ' Ali.,V' 44,4' ,i,_,_, • r.'' ' - A t11 ''1A'.' ,f. ,,, '• '7. .:4A0' '). 6::,*4. . ' . ,0- - .:ill. - ' . :. '. V •'',.;.4.**-1... ) ; ,'. ,..,,-..,- :-._: x t ..1-1 %,.i.• ' ,I ''•• ' •-•,i - . - Ai' IV ' • „, t ,. _ . - ,_,,r ,. :/-, 01;;.,... ,Y- ,•;:!..• • 'Nit .. , ,,,,,,,,,wi. .4- N. ,Ii-i, i., 1/4.,..1\ . 40iftf,,4'•(!•r,'-'•'''i 1- ' • , ,:''-'4 ' '•- • \• 1/119'.. ,-‘'11.4:•,, ••N ',14::,--4;-''' '..- it. ' t4 , pov..•41,.. la ...,A,., ,..., , ,,. .,..# •• I•L • ... ill" , fi '‘'''.: ' ''''' :) ,4,1'1.••,'' ' 4 '':V , ,,,, 474.7:- . '.. ; 3. i •.'• .. ': % ' Tiollor , .,v_ .., . ,, _ . . 7,410 , •,,,,, -;. , „ : , . • .4-t,:, .le. k:.`t>1.*4`1L.N:,- • 11111.*Z. I466:1' '''* ' - '.,* ,,,' ' :;7' . • , '41 r*,...„.._. 44-‹ , • -cit. ''. ' \ Tekiti.iitat•; • 0 ,., ...,/ \?. , . , - .- •)!‘.. A104 t v.- N' '.' '., '-'.11er ,„ ' ,., '.., ' , c -, " '' • • •,',.` t';, .._4‘ip 4 . afs , 4...'..-- •- . „, ,.4,. .• .c4 . •• firlf,, ,. ‘ ,,,i , II' ... :,. .:;.. , ,,,.,,, , , . , , . it, „or* .,„., 1 •,,,N,Ao- ...,,,,- .!,,ikat no Little ...--,.! . . .11/4 ,-- ,- (i .•: YT• ' f ..',.- ',1\ '''' ' j%1'0'7; : 2 ' "loiA I • VI •.,' : i4" ,, , ,1.- ftc,.' 4\_•::•' °,''\I - - ' " 141,..r Cutchogue 4141i ie. 4, • 4 . tcp 4 10) ... . 4 rior id „ • .'4, . ,- '' -',.•;, . ;, .•,i.; ,, , ;!,zi 4, -; & NO' c IA riil , • il* ''''.,,..17 ,!,•_.',Iii -112•17.1.A‘ °'. 1 ) ' ^ 1 ft. I WI ‘ ''Ils • I '1. 'vkl`-•-•-..,1: 111047 $ t OH *fifilef • tAx,:',P .-f„,', .,. : •,:,,4-:-' , ' , t ,— 1,1 •4 , ,. & 4, ,4,,s..7 4 ba,_ ill!d i r j • I) eV I .11,,, • 0 riii.711;a.p`,'4^-:, ;;:'' F 1 ew ..; . • i/ ' • - '44 .4)4(). • 1 j , . • . we . -drikistiii 41 V, w. 110_,L,4;;-,i-1 u 0 • _44,4, • •• A, . isr„ ..:,,,,,‘,,, 01,11N. 11 •t14...4,07:0 .---.•4..vAiMtl',1,1,' •• .7,,'., '7;00'or•*4 8 ....Mt.,i,--4/L.‘6...di 111 4 , """ 4;trr.."r411"4- , • . ..,„ .. 1•41 r'is wi\ -v•••-•• il 1 , ' • ( 011111.111119 VI ' fl•r .i.it ' v.._`‘‘.1to Sk Nassau ‘-'41, 4,T #4, rb_‘.f II,,-.•,3, 1 ',! poile1140111 '. fce Pt , • -u .ok 40/IP A kat kt .\,.., ,. ViN71-6. • Marratooka ita . zifir,.7...,*,,„,•g k.k 1 e /iii k' !'ITAVII‘ Pt tth , -•.A!..„...4 . c) tlo •' " .. . i‘ wellev 15tr "}' Vil 9 a i A •:. .•6 - (1 .tiro % ! 1 . -• \•iiike 104.> .., 1 At. L 4-t,1,1,,:.i, ,,,,;:,-..:,.. .-_ • ,. pi, Iti k *c`y*i., AY4r 'r '• .4 ittlik b • ,• .3, '„1*,,,`,\-,: 4 le .,34>5. ..... • .-,•,)„,-...t a ! •4..° • LtN \*•°7*A, N - Irirt VA, -i " 1 1 1 • . i.)1"* \NM 444031111 1 . •IICIr ‘C','" ) lik , , i / '<)/")/11 'L) • • .'. I, 1. ,,, , ' •\ 4. .-•,-,- •';'',i .1. '...-. , ..s Prepared in cooperation with lin- ' SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER Atli 1iOk11 SUFFOLK COUNTY UFPAR'IAIFN'Tl(OI• FNVIku1 Mit t\ ), , P Sp°'/ • )6• 1 /1'6 •t ✓ &IMOof . . •�yy+ • p .s1/4'.1 •• .... S,._.--- '( ' ' ''•<,, .t A ''' •I'kik/ 4 ' srt4-Ar -, ...4, ,,. Ill, - , • f; .w.,„„, .... ,x. . ,.,,, t,i, ,I. .14. io: _.„ . 1 1 b o / ,(' I G 4rsy'4•', \ '), , j6 n` 4° �• 4a'Ph/Hed'SbgSrN�'1tiff�� •^ Lr •y rr A a D" c4•!e 4•1/41. �\ 6U S/ro•, , ti, a • . • •• p FI6.4'',• / +•,° DOS/ �CD /• i '4 Si I s 'Yte b• b �• 4,,• 4.,O (�-- - - 0 'NFK'0 ICUr f �i, ' \ , ury • kk` \ ro b •• I ° --ln 4 so �,• •ti, I l,.'i ti Ory +•.• - ,, \ y., $ - 44 •, 'r - Salo,/ 1 C r r Y ^ 16,4 Stita 'C • r,by _.. ,t `�� 4•'n �� °•9 44e +~\_ n• 4•f _..0 / l'+!t/* '- 16 1 ; %1-�1''m . �''e • .-�. ' r'y •s,11VI 4;0!•6 �•* �d, • , n'/;� �•+; i tet. `+• .— - 'o •i • i • "100�.I�•.t♦� F ydb.': .► e"/ I• : 4a• ' °�/r,,,, tC`' `., • ,�r1-. S>, • - 4 . / �. of i- • r.,,,,—.:(4lif 4' '?7' ""•—'41.---p •r• 4+0 , --•••,,,,, y V,:!� - '41,14ti; •I�-�1\ I f -- �E,' .•CO •'• i 0 � •+ly'r•r, . 4• I '4.. '/°e P 'A /. r•1, 6 • + P n ` 1 �, ;� 1(-0, ';r , J jdr d,�/�� •r., � �' +if fr 4•,,r, bh- I )o ; 0 iti,, #.....-z, "_ � Jrfir - f +! • 1 , • nr. �, '• .� f. y \ i �..`.., �,� ► �� bti b1�°•• /a, .,r• ,r/ •.,, /�Q'v qr+, ,4,' iP ''i Y + � ' �.� y i yv/H �.�. S`/ f"fa,. � ti"., �S<.•1Ni ��! 4• .,, b^ )�� , �0 •4j ( If 1It , 4, �d �_��t i l /i 1 °r{ 4 • 4° 7.r bf', •',. / 1 ° 4. J ^ �i 1 �,1.� • . .44;4 4,r. •v 86%, •'• v• . \ 3b �4rd • C - -,, ,°rr"r•,'b.4, 4 �I !1� t 444 ° ..,,..\„*„.....„ ,�� ti veno•.�` J •' rr44•G r/ eb••reji°y to • 1 • ~ O • • I e`4 I • '•�,h y S/ 4 r��.� SJ ' ! i/ I s,. n ete/� •3/4.r 4•a 1+1.,'� el� 4•,d '''...4° i . • I )•+d/ - oU I/ ,„ 4000... i v ;� • �' v!� v _ rti�♦/,t ,fsQ�'/�yA i`�'"'Ofj\Jl ,,'' — .i` �• ‘#‘47 /..y"'ri'• V• +444 ` i\1i y•i, �K • ~ar,,°• • �4 4Mu • ., ,r, ,Citi q niI l �/\ �(•11'-q•� 'V ,,,,,:c4,, fV e.[f �•1' :�,•,,•r/ , .tom'" So'iy •..t)(-•‘,' � I ' 1 , ••P •.r Y:frill; <<, .� S. a / ems.' _ , ,f 44 4.,„,J �T 4i�, "��. ,,;` � • 9 ,h • dry.- ,+,4 •, ��i �1 •/ ,ep+.,° :w4'•, •"Y �•,r_. �/� y/�//�/�� t(�� 2 r 1 '� 1,� • �'r.:► ,• r I �•1 ` x,11 ',• is I y ice tti 4''+4.`� aill allii all 1ia ,aAG,.,nY AVull-[ i<, S1'I�IN(; 1` 71 - \/(--i/.;• ;v '! , r / ' IC) e 'L %) w, !• Su,,,, '•�h •(• .�• •t ���' 1 i � r` V n e• '.. • 1,,• I 404, Son 414 °je 41,t, n ^r • L n .,„„,bi n ti • ,• _ 4,, o • , •r' ..,,ip PA •,,O • bye „r 16, p�,l •'� •� WSJ • •••° A 1/4,,, 44r•. ^•,• ,° '14I) 4 fs .) I '.I;/ ,oi \ ',4°•„, , ! rc,.. , f , pp • I ,'wLfnti ✓ (' L f/ li r �^ . `• '"h ••h %° +,t C:. ,. „ ' �T�`rif. v✓ 4., • I `' �/ tFjES ,'� W o n, ^.,° : T,,..V CS 41 i --„, • .•••e),( `O f"/ ?I 7 ,0. •l r , t 't o.ajCs: O 4' C`r� n,, _ " S.—y--�--- - 15151-AriLiD N C :. LONG ,.t'-,r vJ.• ' 1r• ,{i1 ,l! � V. ��,ift cf•,, � �t4��- _ ,i. .°'-• 4. I ��f�" • moi-1y` �f" ,l'�'�. � • ���/) I 2 , jt ,O• •►'q/ � 4!,,t,,,,.*;,,,- •1erO�k��"•�� I k ' � 'l -� 1. � 41V`S � Y_ D �'n' Y,l 1r'ss F 2 qbr� rf r��� 5 � *1,,-41 • �� ••T �Y4r) �y M I 12 �! • ' �+ ,,� i's ° K ���i ° �bGf 1' r°9 !,^L' 'T • �Iry1' l►r t yr .'� 1�fr' ' r^ � � ° �•��"' � � �\' ,'�1 �, �I,I✓„,], ��,,,!u-- 0 �I�,(- �4 ��l � i `.�.,.`` 's'f'r,'s Z. N C fk 1i If . .F� ''1 I 1 1i. vr,,` `�-' S�, rr r,nV bq,,vW,,,e,• /s/�(\/II III 4. /, �/�In �d� ),Q'.f s, 41 I'ie '•�,� ?, , w(/ 7'-_ )I ` ,I • . . �•(, -� ^••4 ,',• ,, n.,O I I k l ' VV '^ • - 4:;,/ l ,� 7' If. / sIr • l . _l I ''i .(f• r F u•, !,�t-4�, Y�• r r. ',1 /; ( • A f• I y s' , \ ,..,0 tri/,, 'nejP °os n 4\t' / t i ( °per "� . h'` ( ( r°`r / / • +• /fir ''4.s ‘'° 6! • a. ��n)i. .� SOY t �� 1 `4 fir° • '^ �' " 1 — i 1 .f I• I t t, 11� ° v +..° /h_ II ,y l a 1 . O'�r'•e a j;'•L .�yAl ►tr� '� h s 1�, y• •I I .Q t'. I S r / �' `' Q `a ' , , ,ca rp .I-v ,'` . 6.0 a°v�/Lni. q • r x •� N •, '`,i�� `l• O e �rgs ^•' +~° � 1 4 /4 � Li�' •••a •4• '17�,'" .� ,,• •°!yi •'''4. r/,• Y-W` 1• . r II O ,,- Toll ° •�- ./...; ,} v ?C• o• ,1,. �•I/' V )• • /l r - �- `' ', 'Y"'i° ,...4., •, r'hr �l I�_ 7t A 111 ••,•• ;�'4/i,.� ^'� �' ;%' iJ�,• �,' II r^r�°n.�2�`/^•�° IVu71...1'444b il•M a • q f,,,.• ...:7,.4t) I'�P 7 1 �•1 +,.,,'�T-. f:. -At l f( s. `• .. .."41•';'.#4.—..1 t.. �/r y C�O______!...„4,,Z r ,, ,,, ,,,:3‘‘_., ,,..„,... �� 4• O 7. +. 7' . , / /`U '• s1� 4'1 f •�'�7.` C�'i(•Q��yq, ,,C c,�M-� 4,,:,.. •. -w 1 r •• •/ ..��,u. �ll 'y. 1 tl if:• �� "•"� `�!e 1 I, �' i`• c , t , „,,A,..,,,, °. M IAlla" "'^ ) kW„ M. -- SO M a "III ON r' I SS V OM a ) m I7l �b3" S ' sui , population that has been increasing rapidly since the end of World War II. The greatest increases in population and ground-water pumpage have been in the western part °I the county. Before about 1960, wells tapping the upper glacial aquifer supplied nearly all the water used in Suffolk County. Since then,pumpage from the Magothy aquifer has increased, and in 1970,111e wells tapping the Magothy aquifer supplied LloydEXI'I.ANA7ON about one-third the water used. (See map showing areal distri- aquifer, p 2 AI'l'Rt)XIM' I L. ARI AL ( NTIK OFMAJOR bution of major pumpage by aquifer 1970.) GkUUNI'•NATER PUMPING AND SUllk('li CHANGES OF GROUND WATER IN STORAGE ' AQU11 1 5.S Diameter circle is proper ) r�'. t ,conal Iu �.u,npage,number is average daily An area of about 140 square miles in west-central Suffolkpunipage, in million gallons per day ,r County is underlain by about 4.5 trillion gallons of fresh Magothy aquifer Upper glacial water (Soren, 1971a, p. 20). By extrapolation, the total fresh aquifer , ' ground water beneath all the county is probably 4 to 5 times this volume. Withdrawals of ground water have caused the water table in some parts of the county to decline as much as 25 feet I' , from earliest known levels in 1903 (map showing net change '--.r", in the position of the water table) and have probably caused a small regional but generally undetected landward advance of salty ground water. The decline of the water table y reflects a loss of 60 to 80 billion gallons of fresh water from the ground-water reservoir between 1903 and 1971. however, this loss of ground water from storage is less than I percent h of the total ground water in storage in Suffolk County. '\' Q!' 11 I SELECTED REFERENCES Cohen, Philip, Franke, O.L., and Foxworthy, B.L., 1968, An k atlas of Long Island's water resources: New York Water I Resources Comm.' Bull. 62, 117 p. ,;,ti 1970, Water for the future of Long Island, New York: New York State Dept. Environmental Conserv. ' Water Resources Bull. 62A, 36 p. Cohen, Philip, Franke, O.L., and McClymonds, N.E., 1969, . Hydrologic effects of the 1962-66 drought on Long Island, New York: U.S. Geol. Survey Water-Supply Paper ', 1879-F, 18 p. , Cohen, Philip, Vaupel, D.E., and McClymonds, N.E., 1971, Detergents in the streamflow of Suffolk County, Long Island, New York, in Geological Survey Research, 1971 : U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 750-C, p. C210—C214. I Collins, M.A., Gelhar, L.W., 1970, Ground-water hydrology of the Long Island aquifer system: Mass. Inst. Techno- �` logy, hydrodynamics Lab. Rept. no. 122, 185 p. UN Ell 11111 11111 all ON 11111 1111 it NM 11111 All 11111 11111 Ell OS 1111 SE • • .?; (, .1 /'i/y 32113 •.' ----' - ILI.IU', l tib, .)• .'yin ,, V — 4 F 1' w 1 0 Io Z �:/i �••l \ k.,,,,,...,,H..... goo E � S a' Ji 2 Q� ?F r��� \ � ) I l • a ./ 1 t; 1- ,a i U E� • i' �' �:w 1/rel • SEA d W gc E F- 0 400' )�. �~''- � • I' LEVEL �"�_— �� Shore cres11 I G i ] SI __ - --� SEA / ,�. ire , y I o•. 1 Q —_��� �� LEVEL Gv�r.(�•. �•f 400' Gardiners Clay upper glacial • ' U q Ilk d'/ ;�'e ," Monmouth greensand aquifer •_ i,., , / , 1 Magothy aquifer �T- 400 �' I ~�`' ., �a } ``/ , 800' Ration c1 Y __ —� 800. 300 t% V� .' r' \-- o^ �' �, ;; 1200' Lloyd acuiter �� T� % fi.• 1 a iN � �� 1200' 4f d:•V j'e'.li•e- vo;fe. iip* 1,• . 1800'- My,17y tBedrock rr.- t h• ).0) „J/y , 1600' / / 1 /•1•(:,!7n /� ,..lel c'„'\4t ri li y ,) i, , "y .t-,t 0 O OV p E' ? c O ., v .��t rt p s 1 ' it. . "4 wo407.;. ' 2YFcc 4,1 N. 200' i` F-Q ,.1 It E +., SEA .� i 1- Z F' / , LEVEL ___ UPPer glacial aquifer — '� to . Gree .ort 200' __ __ SEA 4; �1'•i. 400 Gardiners Clay J 1 LEVEL 11% 4% Magothy aquifer Monmouth greensand _ __———— �- �� goo 800' i '' _—--- —r Raritan clay //.� 1 1200' t.Io d r4!0� i` .4 / Bedrock `,, 1200' 1600• -+'-.” ' ..., III\ 1600' Ar. -MJs _Aan al r Oar, . . - Wiler 11111 IIIII 11111 "Ill .r JIM 11111H II" lin Approiri Hydrogeologic mate unit' thickness Description and water-bearing properties Geologic um, fleet) Shore,beach, Beach sand and gravel and dune sand,tan,:;,own,and white and black,brown.and gray bay-bottom salt-marsh deposits of clay and silt.Beach and dune deposits in shore areas contain thin lenses of fresh water deposits,and 0-so underlain by salty ground water.Clay and silt in bay bottoms tend to confine water in underlying ' artificial fill strata. Till;includes Clay,silt,sand,gravel,and boulders,tan,brown,and brownish-gray.Deposits are commonly unsorted terminal-,ground-, 0-150 and unstratified but can also include crudely to well sorted and stratified glacial drift. Deposits lie and ablation-moraine Upper • chiefly above water table and are not an important source of ground water. Hydraulic conductivity deposits is very low to moderate.Clayey till causes local perched ground-water bodies. glacial Lacuatrine deposits consist chiefly of clay and silt,brown,brownish-gray,and gray. These beds occur Lacustrine and at many places in the northern part of the county,chiefly in the Smithtown area where they have marine deposits0-300 been referred to as the"Smithtown clay."Marina beds of gray-green clay and silt occur at shallow depths in shoreline areas.Hydraulic conductivity is generally very low.Not$source of ground water. aquifer Deposits serve chiefly to confine water in underlying strata. • Stratified fine to coarse sand and gravel,light-to dark-brown,tan,and yellowish-brown. Hydraulic con- ductivity of Outwash is usually high,estimated to be as much as 200 feet per day.Wells screened in outwesh deposits yield as much as 2,000 gallons per minute and have specific capacities that are Outwash deposits 0-350 usually more then 5O gallons per minute per foot of drawdown in the well.Deposits generally contain water under water-table conditions. The Mennetto Gravel of Pliocene(?)ape(below)is included with these deposits because of lithologic resemblance and physical continuity.Mennetto beds lie above the miter table and are not a source of water. UNCONFORMITY -- -- - -- Marine deposits of clay and silt with some interbedded sand and gravel,greenish-gray and gray Depos Gardiner'Clay Gardiner' Clay 0-75 its have low hydraulic conductivity and confine water in underlying strata. Unit occurs mainly along southshore area. See"upper glacial Mannetto Gravel aquifer,outwash 0-125 See"Outwash deposits,"above. deposits,"above Monmouth Group Monmouth Interbedded marine deposits of clay,silt.and sand,dark-greenish-gray,greenish-black.greenish,dark- gmouthnds 0-200 gray,and black,containing much glauconite and lignite.Unit has low hydraulic conductivity and confines water in underlying Magothy aquifer in southshore area. -UNCONFORMITY Deposits consist of gray to white fine to coarse sand with interstitial clay,silt,and lignite,interbedded with lenses end thin to thick beds of light-to dark-gray clay,silt,and clayey and silty send,and lam- ins.and thin beds of lignite and pyrite.Basal 100 to 200 feet is generally composed of coarse sand ' latawan Group- Magothy and gravel beds.Commonly with much interstitial clay and silt.interbedded with strata similar to Magothy Formation 0-1,000 those in upper pert.Hydraulic conductivity of unit varies widely but is estimated to average about aquifer undifferentiated 70 feet per day.Wells screened in the Magothy aquifer yield as much as 1,51)0 gallons per minute, and they have specific capacities that are usually lest than 50 gallons per minute per foot of drew- , down in the well.Water in the aquifer is poorly to well confined;confinement is greatest near south shore where unit is overlain by Monmouth greensend and Gardiner'Clay. NM OM INS MI al I= IIIII ON ' M IIIIIi NM OM ION MI OM all SIM IIIIiii MAP SNOWING SURFICIAL GEOLOGY ki' '^' » 61, � \ •r., fJ ( r EXPLANAIII)N }41( w --,OQ— APPK(IXIMA"II. 01I)k(kk 4I)NI1/lif, • 'y.,, �„'••• ..k ..- '• ""P- Shows Illludc of bedrock surface ' . �• • •, . .,''• �r r .r, .- Dashed where Inferred.I onlour Inler, 1 L., 1 • / , ./ •'.,, �+^ `J '+ ., w , . •i -.4,, • ( 100(cel.Dtlum a morn ser Icvel ••,'roti `' ti �� , �+'� a (� " ..V .t, ` .••f • 1 N'''•!.'�r°rI, 5w„ ®� P ' f�r' „r� -r 4 ,. \ .5,I \\ ` 642 -542--...;.,", �' \\\ 5y„ y Ian/ \\ ••`•• `ii', -.Ix_ \ \— JM " _ ,`• ,` • ' \-7,- b• ( ' Ili .�.,'1.t� --"%•---- ...4.......... / ' 'tea, ...4 \\ •. •-L 1 a � ,. J .d j,., '41 M_. •\ •• ti �� T ! Q1.,* Is 1 �..�• "I r., h• •/ D?-•- :',0,,,0.,7•' c,�'+•►� 4 a i.;:ist , ,...y..:::it,,,,,.:Re..-:-.;isi:1 1 ----__,...._...._ •-.- ,.... i_l-_-800_...,, D ...,..,„...0 jot - d. '4.4,..4,...-Z-a...: %,,. -rU4 •�` O(yam• ,,��llV��'1� �,r'/•I..,7, Imo._ f :L VL - _Z. •O`r'r ••• 4"may, o+• • , vi 'n,• M j. i 1r,. y j' 'r ) u; i`-aTT" , J+.. I 1�.``'�•./ ----1..._ .v:' • 1'' • ^4.(1)A �, '% rn `,,V I I 1 ` ,��T_ . i t r , • /if4 „a .�• .,,,, '�^••�_ 5. Z-+V. ''''. V r .�-� , LTi Imo/ �, r/1 !v to r, L r p r'a '.r o =��� •.. ` :C..'"t • 'p! l't'd ',%— _ Af 'N•('� 1 �. „��'•.4I?� a v., �'�i;.. j"7�^a- <<, •+M o �1� •�'+.. 1--x.,1 w ;q/ --- t'. I' ,•'•I1 , , §'�7 ' ,.1 1 �/, I ''„,.,•4`,'f•.� •+,1y '.7,a' '�'/i /q,M �• ' • ...,,• .7,,,,--:-:_:_.„,..:,..,_ ..• •.,�._'l Y� 47 V tom • .k...,''20- '►•. -/� , /;'.,.., „�.40g...,a .t ♦`' ."y�0,"_\C •,,• 'R=r �-, C! � •. ----- ••r`n ra. � _ 1 ,' �� , ` /t•, I'�'” 'qI + "•I- M ' s~'-ar.:•� -4 e••yp$•; ,`,4 .&„-1 ,%-..??t., j ,,-"kyr • (_^'__ .., • gi‘ .r:�. ,1`I!l / I. .. ,.^y„ IL .1f[�'I�r r ~• '{•• •, `�'�'/T�` I GNcf t PPP 'it'( • ,/,�" �•.i��r _ • .,I...•I '� I •RFS / is R-. f /r ' a4'• •1,0 ILrf� 1 1. • r .-J I.44-.14.`'-'t•:i ., , v� fir` /4t3 —^'1 • a !�''i'. .'. .;/, • �I ,` i •I^!w a"•�:}1 1•' ► . •tI i:,y� ,. 7`•..�..;._-/ ,, ,,/,,:, �, _____,...„....4.,__...5 ;,U�p�1. '•a•LA.'./t„y, " +�. r '.�'1(rp.3A ¢•;. a',i. qd n /w'T •.: % .1 r >e. . r • , .'), ,•••� • - +-_ _ ^'.... __ --+^-. _ "Y'1r,-Is4•�jsa ` ,,,.'+-'•, 1 / .r'. ....4.1 9�-'. ---7-----=,...---'31/4”-o-.. 4. Ma.�t yHww H.L-�'". -1300 �• �• •a.511 -t....i. —. '•a i t0 • r '��'yc.•'. I....,.�-,rl•�.a�:•.,,.,.. . .. Al I 1'./ \ I WYw••• ,•.Mw••/Mas / Nos. I oaal,on of coma p.,,n t • on Pica I in/amen and Son 1 —3 IAP SHOWING CONFIGURATION OF THE BEDROCK c1IRF•CK f el 1.11 tall M MI I NM V all 1111111 111111 '— 11.1 all MN • (1 'l (f,.. •,�I �� 1. , 1 I) • • • f /11,11j66 ' - . I . , . filli* i\s ,,Ir. ..-- ••••.* — .41010 •• ., 4 ADP /A 'n,,•'•., ' \( 'til • ti4� " •',4,.,;/--I•y,c ;;y'(,• •I / •(J i _T "0 •„r r `�b;'or+r 15 ',iii ti FF ' 1 .+ r ., ~•�' " �• •414•, • � ._• ill INS - ' all 111111 NM IMO 11111111 111111 all INN Ell ail 111111 in 411111 MIS OMR OM 11111 11111 ::,,.t , I,I, "I MAP SHOWING ALTITUDE OF WATER TABLE, SPRING 1971 .-' '-• • • .. . ... ., V .., .. .„.. ..,, ..., • • .: ..b.,; • • '• ' 9. 'i c' ' ' ' . ,. J'il• 'I / .' i i • • . 0 --. . .-i ,, . ,, • , .1,e.)„,„ , ,. • •.1 .4-' •$,.,-- \ i, + , ,. A.,.1„, '1 .1., • •.• () .V C ...i .." • . •••... . ' / s 1 ...., . '••• • ' Li - • . ...., • • . , v.. ,.. ... , . . • , • . () Ij • ,\ ..„ , t' ''."‘. '... , ,.'•if, .. , 4, ' 'N..,' - '4 8 1 4, •„ • „ •, . •, . • .... • '•••• •• ., .........-- ••,. •• . '• • , ..„ .... ....'<- ...., . ••• ....' 4.4 ...„ .,.. '••• . ,, . •,,, ''''' • .., ,,, • S.. ... . '',.. ,..,, .... , •.,4' , , A!tr'..;,...„ . . ••,.. ''... ';,' `Aktv,.'1C: • •‘,..i.,:l,,,'- ''", .^., . . ,,,_"IlF" ....- ,/.--"-,-• '..... e 7-47 s ,i,!"-.I, A-.,tif-•-434.....___.C...„ \ \ .. ... -.0'------- ''',.7 .. - .1 '• ' '111X, -• • '•%,,, "'4 . ..."-- f ri (.4,1, , r••• ,..73',-.,,r,-",:•-:- _ . „ • N.. •- ; - • ., , „IP, . 4' . - ......_--- • , . v, , f. 4...; 4\ ,....:. • ...„ __..a .'-P, . v 't J t •••..:.„ •, • •"....,, ..•. 1,1; , , .,,,,. ,, ,..: i .,•., • .4 r: -, , , —.-r.- 1, --,74--)k.„' ..., ' ,..,- . n-\'• '' t ,L7) ,•••:"...., •'' 'io • k....„,, ...,. : ... ,..„.a (NA. ,t It , ,1 •,1/4'itc.,-;,. .., ..,? . .'-. ' 7J''' ..„,....4,4, , „.,-. '47,,t, ,. ,• 4::,,, . ,. 1 li 1,1.,,,,,,, N) •.,1 •,.., '•i 4./, ., ,,,,," „:Z.z....!. ,,,T' , J.\ ' ' ,,,, ..„ ...• • 1/44,4. 'Avoitib , ..:4h 6I'' •• " ‘ ,..-:4 1141- ., ; • .,° V . (..A,} • 'AV,. ....4,;.4..... ......' '_ ..„......'''.' , . .r . %':s7\...N.. •„NIL' if ‘i ./ :4 ,,,4::.,:. „., „,, )1 i..,,,,,, :',./. .,1,_: 1 1 i. ', ,. ' ....,:, i ' I' . .'. . 4. II&'.\ '.3+- " . -''' ,...4.,,,,:‘ ,,l'• N, . • r, , . - -17,-,••'-^ , ( • ,,, , ....... - , ' r'-..-%/: -.. oi,:, ..JO': ', ....‘ '...4.,, ••••••;‘'.., **4,::::''',,.,,, 1 Sr, ., .., ..• • t I C.(‘.1,' 1 ... *I i . • - .'- "•"0.,, . • ,r I ••.'' ,. .... ' -., /,.,..,‘,1 %...4 -1 t.:,,,, •'''C'1:[ '',.''1,, :'• 4."''Z' ' ''''''Cni'% - . 1,4-:«:'• ': '4' "I' '' yt-- s., 1•1 • i • -\ I, • ..A t, ', ' ,' ---7- vglig . k 1 ,.. . .• , .. . ,,. ..• ,, ,• • .. . ,',,'4,• , f";i0„,4 -..,- ,,,,.•,,,'•1.,:t,.,, , ......- ., Mi- ..• . i . • •••• t, ,,..., -- --' •• i-1,, ','f': - ,, ,. • . •.. - • ‘,4,..,, . ,.. : ' ... 7...... •• •,,>: 4,-. • • •If.st.1i, 1 I. 11.... '‘•;.,,.4,•14,.--rtiskt.,,,,i .. •. i ; 'is ;. , ,7...,„ ')- • . ,. .• . • - i.•,,, ,,-,. ,„- : ----: , ' .,..• • 4. . ,i .: ) r.,4 ...• •-•,,,,1, •''f.:.: ' '.,_•,........-mi: • . ' - •,- • . . .41 3" '.--••••• \ '''.A x:- . , . • " ,... ..\ . „ , • ,. .,.., < 6 • .;.., .., .,,,,,.. .....,..„io „ I/ ,; . .,,." ,,,, ,..,..,,••A- ,--,--,J........,.....* ,.i '.,,c)a ,,4.;.,,..,.,......,.......,11. ....t,,,`rke,tr.„„h,.,„,,,, ‘ ,i, 1..\ . i\, '(... -/-,..).C'flii, '....,:. , '• ------- i(,:;,.,,,t•'":-:77•:. , ,,,,,:‘,. i r.:..,' I,),,.., ...,,...,, ..._..,._,__.,A i___•.__../: 1 .. .. ',. ."•••.."`•,, K 1 ., ,, .• i H'"'IT'• ..!". - , .....i„," -,,,, -Ji _ ,,,, s. N , — -- ..., ..„ -• ...., ..„ . .. ,•,. ..„ ..,. .... . . --, *•-• .. . r r . .. • .., .. • , . • ' . °I ..SJ 1 ;'10 3'YDROLOCY AND 80SIE EFFECTS OF URBANIZATION ON IONG ISLAND. NEW YORK underlain by terminal-moraine deposits, the depth to Isbister (1966), Lubke (1964), Lusczynski and Swar- I the water table is more than 50 feet, and in small zenski (1966), Perlmutter and Geraghty (1963), areas the depth to the water table is more than 200 Pluliowski and Kantrowitz (1964), and Swarzenski feet. Depths to the water table near the northern (1963). I coast of the island generally are more than 20 feet, Long Island is underlain by consolidated bedrock, except adjacent to stream channels or in narrow bands which, in turn, is overlain by a wedge-shaped mass of near the shoreline_ unconsolidated rock materials (fig. 8).' These mate- rials, which constitute Long Island's ground-water GROUND-WATER RESERVOIR reservoir, consist primarily of a series of Pleistocene HYDROLOGIC PEATURES OF THE GROUND-WATER RESERVOIR glacial deposits and Cretaceous fluvial or deltaic depos- it The overall hydrogeologic setting of Long Island its composed of gravel, sand, silt, clay, and mixtures was described in considerable detail by Veatch (1906), thereof. The Cretaceous deposits were eroded by Fuller (1914), used Suter, De Laguna, and Perlmutter (1949). The geology and related hydrology of several AThe actual dip of the upper bedrock surface la alight:, lees than r• •d t e Megotbs •a ifer snow. a Iwo a is nue to the large voerticsurfe ce smaller areas of Long Island have been studied in greater detail:by others, including De Laguna (1963), Bealy aaass.t.nea.t this cross aectiou. I =1} NORTH v LONG ISLAND o v SOUTH I LONG WAND 40 m ATLANTIC SOUND •••••••••.-. .•-•..••'•.•...'-:Upper I �Y OCEAN ••:'.:4..:,• s:..,••. . • g aclal •a'.w :.....• -...•. Upper '/r •*:.,N:. • � �`�_\\' •• •.• • ve• rs C� and undifteeiee at /• .•. •. •.40 '2�.• `�``• �` .' • '~ �.'• .� \�`•' •Ja—re°' •ay . deposits '.• `-• '� ' • .•,.... .•. \ .•:-...4...-• '` . ,er .... • • • :, � !•.^•• Magothy aquife�� '-\ : •�\ . •�\ / \` .....:"•-+.•, • '941./.Or_ • n Pia;• .'... • :.i:::••: • �` o.. :r Not to scale / EXPLANATION I .. .:::7t7:. , . . . . i I pay Sandy clay,clayey sand,and silt Sand GravelConsolidated rock I Fawn8.--Geologic features of the ground-water reservoir. / / ��i� (14,, ci /14c._ �/ ,r ,, /97a-- b 1 (00 I _. . .. .. . ..... SUMMARY OF HYDROLOGIC SITUATION AS A GUIDE TO WATER-MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES F11 and a,acters so that the Pleistocene deposits Major features of this map are the two are of n irregular Cretaceous surface, and in places highest ground-water altitude (represented by closed i) Istocene deposits fill valleys cut by preglacial 80-ft and 60-ft contours) which extend approximately it acial streams. These valleys have been fairly westward in the north-central parts of Nassau and it - `ned in Kings and Queens Counties and along Suffolk Counties. Also noteworthy are the steep water- ' Ihern margin of the island eastward to the level gradients near the north shore of Long Islandii of Suffolk County. In eastern Suffolk County, compared to the gradients near the south shore. er, data on the contact between the Pleistocene The water table, which is the upper boundary of 1 Cretaceous are very sparse.. the ground water reservoir, is a dynamic (moveable) i upper surface of the Cretaceous deposits is feature. Present information indicates that recharge to sea level in a large area in northern Nassau and the water table occurs throughout virtually all of i - Suffolk Counties, and in all but a few small Long Island. Therefore, the water table is not, from i IIto Pleistocene deposits cover the Cretaceous the point of view of potential theory. a stream sur- throughout Long Island. Pertinent informa- face. It is instead a surface characterized by a con- ; c teeming the principal hydrogeologic units stantly varying potential which is equal to the altitude IIhe ground-water reservoir are briefly sum- of the water table at any point. Because the water in table 2. table on Long Island is largely a recharging potential ,c-d water in the uppermost part of the zone boundary of the ground-water reservior, streamlines !i ttion on I'"; To In:i. (mainly in the upper flow perpendicularly from the water table into the aquifer, but locally also in the Magothy ground-water reservoir. Locally, as near the shorelines °rl is generally under water-table conditions. where ground water is lost by evapotranspiration, the I conditions predominate in most of the other water table is a discharging potential boundary. the ground-water reservoir of Long Island, The ground-water reservoir is bordered laterally by e saturated deposits are overlain and confined a second moveable boundary—the fresh -lit water inter- : , : . and clayey layers of low hydraulic conduc- face.The position of this interface (or these interfaces) II he hydraulic head in the confined aquifers is fairly accurately known only in soutiwestern Nassau from several feet below the water table to and southeastern Queens Counties as a result of an I 9 -1 feet above it. At places along the north and intensive investigation by Lusczynski and Swarzenski gyres and on the barrier beaches, the head in (1966).A north-south cross section through the Illground- yd aquifer is high enough to cause some wells water reservoir in this area (fig. 10) shows three eep- ^-netrate this aquifer to flow. - crate salt-water wedges—a shallow wedge in the glacial ition to the Raritan clay, which confines water aquifer and intermediate and deep wedges in the i.loyd aquifer, the other major well-defined Magothy aquifer. Furthermore, a fourth wedge exists inf layer in the ground-water reservoir is the in the Lloyd aquifer somewhere seaward of the barrier s Clay. This unit locally confines water in beaches. ,,co and Magothy aquifers. Numerous clayey The occurrence of fresh ground water in the Lloyd ;t y layers in the Magothy aquifer and clay aquifer below salty ground water in the lower part he glacial deposits also are significant con- of the Magothy aquifer has never been adequately 0,'ers. Normally, the degree of confinement in explained. However, this occurrence must be related gothy aquifer increases with depth as more in some way to the relatively impermeable Raritan clayey layers intervene between the deep clay overlying the Lloyd aquifer. At least four sep- the water table. arate wedges of salty ground water with relative positions approximately as indicated in figure 10 prob- 'DAR .s OF THE FRESH MOUND-WATER RESERVOIR ably occur for a considerable distance eastward from Lundaries of the fresh ground-water reservoir western Nassau County (on the order of tens of ater table, the fresh-salt water interface, and miles) along the south shore of Long Island. 'd--tck surface. The estimated average position Very scanty information indicates that the Lloyd Itier table under natural conditions is shown aquifer and the deep Magothy aquifer contain salty 9. The position of the contours is based on ground water beneath the Forks of Long Island. The ? ^f the water table in Kings, Queens, and fresh ground water beneath the Forks occurs in a wnties in 1903 (prepared by Veatch in 1906), lens ranging in thickness from a few feet to several III tater water-table maps of Suffolk County. hundred feet. I %6t )1A-8 Ctt^d Pe C ,,/,y'' 0'c / 7.-"' I ' ' ' j 1 111 712 HYDROLOGY AND SOME EFFECTS OF URBANIZATION ON LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK TABLE 2.—Summary of the rock units and their water-bearing properties, Long Island, N.Y. 111 (After McClymonds and Franke,19711 I Approd- I Depth I Hydro- I mate I from System series I deolotle unit geologic Imaslmumi land Character of deposits Water-bearing proposes . i , 1 unit thickness surface (feral to top (feet) 1 , Artificial nil.salt Holocene 50 0 Send,gravel,clay,silt.organic mud.i Permeable sandy beds beneath barrage Holocene mann deposlu, deposits pest,loam.and shells. { beeches)acid fresh nests at sl l I stream alluvium. Colors are trey,brown.green.black, depths. brackish to arty wars es and shoreline depsiand yellow. I pester depth.Clay and silt barn ata Holocene artificial-fill deposits of bays retard salt-water eneroacOmeee travel.sand,clay,and rubbish. I and confine underlying agatler. Stnram-floodylatn and mama de- posits may yield small gaanGtea of iwater. but are genersav clayey or silty and much fess permeab,e than underlying upper glacial squab. J � Till(mostly aloog north shore and In: Till is poorly peemeibte: oommonif moraines) composed of clay. sand. : causes perched-water bodies add i ravel,and boulder.Forms Harbor impedes downward pem rlaosr a Hill and Ronkonkoma terraltsal ( water to underlying beds. moraines. Outwaah deposits are moderately or Outwear* deposits (mostly between . highly permeable:specific ospantaas and south of terminal moraines. of wells tapping them range Com but also Interlayered with till) about 10 to more than 110 rpm per • tonsst of quanta* sand, fine to , foot of drawdown.Good le estd)s very coarse,and gravel, pebble to lnftlnr>,tlon down. rt ad i.l boulder sized. Glaclolacustrine and marine clay Upper Pleistocene Upper glutei 000 0-10 Olaelolaeustrin. deposits (mostly in I depasitsa,,mostly poorly permrsbsa deposits aquifer central and eastern Long Island) but Weeny have ail* modvasdy and mann.clay(locally along South i permeable layers of sand and glee# shore)consist of silt,clay,and some I generally retard downward-perano sand and grant layers:Includes—33- I tion of round water. - foot clay" In southern Nassau, Contains fresh water.etcept on,the County and Queens County. ! shorelines.Till and marine decoao Colors are mainly grey, brown, and i locally retard salt-water ehmases. yellow; silt and clay locally ate meet. grayish green. Contains shells and plant remains. generally In finer grained beds:also Quaternarycontai s Foraminifera. Contains chlorite,biotite,muscovite, hornblende.olivine,and feldspar as I memory minerals; "20-foot clay., Pleistocene commonly controls*glauconite. I —Unconformityf Clay, ant,and few layers of and and ! Poorly permeable:constitutes coon Arae gavel. layer for underlying la�eto aCster Colors are grayish green and brown. I Locally, and layers yield Cs. Contains marine shells.Foremin:era. quanuties of water. and lignite:alsogtaucontte,locally. Qardiners Clay Qardtners 300 10.400 Altitude of top generally is SO-iri It Clay below mean sea level. Occurs in Rings and Queens Counties, southern Nassau County, and Suffolk County;similar clay ocean I In buried valleys near north shore. - —Vncootormityy— Sand,fine to very coarse,and gravel to ndsiltdu; few layer of clay and silt.large-pebble size: Gravel t composed of )toderetely to highly permttssie crystalline and sedimentary recto. contains mostly fresh water, hat Jamas()ravel Jansen, 300 16110 Color Is mostly dark brown. brackish water and water crab aquifer Ce,'stains chlorite.bindle.muscovite, iron content locally In soctbeYves borobleede, and feldspar as scow Nassau County and southern Q Cool I tory minerals. County. Spent&&capentfee of sees Oesun to Kings and Queens Countta, in the Jameco range from about m to and southern Masons County: 130 rpm per foot of drawdown. similar deposits occur in bunts valleys near north shore. —U neoaformIty— (Commonly Gravel, anti to soars.. and lenses of Included sand;scattered clay lenses. Highly permeable. but occurs atom) Tertlary(y) Pllacene(!) ]tuortatto Gravel with upper 300 0-I30 Colors are white,yellow,and brown. above water table.Ecoellent laac8:t� glacial Occurs only nese Nassau-Suffolk I 'ton charterutla. Vneonformfty— County border near tenter of island. Bend,ane to medium.clayey In port: ! rMost L^yers are poorly to rtaderstelr I Interbedded with lenses and layers 4 permeable:some are highly permese of coarse sand and sandy and solid 4 b!e locally.Specific capacities of was clay. Gravel las common In Oval In the Magothy generally raise L" 10-200 ft. Sand std gravel are 4 t to about 3o gpne per foot of dm*. gunnies*.Lignite.pyrite.and Von • down,rarely are as mush as 90:.m Cretaceous totb1oxide concretions are common: , per it.Water is uncondaed in ulna,' Formation Magothy ,100 0-000 muscovite, magnetite. rutile, and , most purls, elsewhere is conf.:-.i i aquifer garnet am eccaeory minerals. Water is generally of eseellent ausi;y Caton are ray, white, red, brown, but has high Iron content lots.* and yellow. { along north and south Moores Constitutes principal aquae: )x i publtrsupply wells In western Lora iIsland,eccept Kings County w it is mostly absent.Has been instal by salty-ground water locally u southwestern Nassau Counts 1.-1-1 southern Queens County. and U small areas along north shore. II SUMMARY OF IIYDROLOG ICI SITUATION AS A GUIDE TO WATER-MANAGEMENT ALTERRNATIVES F13 ITABLE 2.—Suutntary of the rock units and their ,cater-hearing properties, Long Island, N.Y.—Continued I Approtl- I Depth Ifydro• ( mate 1 from gene. Ge.Iocte unitgeoiecic maximum I land i Character of deposits Weter•hearinF propertiesunit thickness surface (feet) to top (feet) —inconformity—.—---- — Is Corer Clay.solid and silty;few lenses and Cretaceous layers of sand:little gravel. Lignite Poorly to very poorly permeable•. Clay mem- Raritan clay 300 70-1,600 and pyrite are common. eonririutes confining layer for under. her Colon are gray, red. and white, lying Lloyd aquifer. Very few wells i commonly variegated. produce appreciable water from these deposits. Raritan f Forma- Sand. fine to coarse, and gravel. Poorly to moderately permeable. tion commonly with clayey matris:some Specific capacities of wells In the lemma and layers of solid and silty Lloyd generally range from t to about cloy;contains thin lignite layers and 2S gpm per root of drawdown.rarely Locally. Rp iron concretions locally.Locally.has are as much as 60 m per ft.Water Is Lloyd Sand Lloyd aquifer 600 3304,600 gradational contact with overlying confined under artesian pressure bT Member Raritan clay. Sand and mast of overlying Raritan slay:gay of COWS a1yello r C031,111C031,111014. excellent quality but baa bIgh iron My. and white: content loaliy.Has been invaded by clay L red locally. salty ground wafer locally in necks near norma abate. ...est c'iuiler is mostly shallow and overlyingMAT dissentinta o.Called deep confined—UOeonformlty— aquifer in some earlier repine. Crystalline metamorphic and Igneous Poorly permeable to virtually tm- roeks; musoovite-biotite schist. parmeaWe;consututaa virtually the • gneiss. and granite. A soft elate! lower boundary of rad-ware I1 Bedrock Bedrock 0-2,700 cons of weathered bedrock locally is reser coir. Some bard.fresh water is more than too ft thick. contained in loins and fracturs,but is impracticable to develop at most places:however,a few wells near the western edges of Queens and Kings Counties obtain water from the bedrock. -esh-salt water interface is not a sharp The fresh-salt water interface is a complex stream- The horizontal distance over which the line surface, and fresh ground water discharging into -solids content of ground water changes the ocean and bays moves parallel to the interface o ipletely fresh to completely salty is gen.. and not across it. The hydrodynamics of a stable the order of 2-3 thousand feet near the interface and, to an even greater degree, an unstable �t ore of Long Island. Over this distance, interface that changes position in response to changes is Ived-solids content of the ground water in head within the ground-water reservoir, is compli- at first gradually in the direction of the cated and beyond the scope .of this report. (See gid water and then more rapidly. Lusczynski, 1961; Cooper, 1964; and Kohout, 1964.) S' 7e'OO' 45' 30' 15' 73'00' 45' 30' 1S' 1200' 71%5' I I : 1 v– 1 c.'" 1 ......„1.,.......,......„1.,.......,�......„1.,......., 1 NEW YORK .' ,..:)1 l t CONNECTICUT / / 500° fir.:,_ „v/ F — t (11*.11-"AliPiII 0 s 4 • '1:3 \ — �, f�`{ lre� 60 - - to �� ` Y�.1l•) 6's l J 6' - EXPLANATION if .4_ J , . — i 2' tNster•uble contour !� " Shows estimated allifede of the w•wrer table Ali", g� -,--- P c j• Grp S+� y ceder gottiroi rowdDotei Ca e.e. .seeenn(s - d1 �� c E 3,1.+,awl Jolter patting n wean Orel ,) J� r1 r I G O 5 0 5 10 15 TO 25 MILES ATL (,.,,1 1 1 I t _ 1 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 f I Fracas 9.—Estimated average position of the water-table under natural conditions. Md//4/ /S I (O I Appendix C I HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL SITES REPORT ' NEW YORK STATE DEPART`INT OF EtiVIRON2"�*lTAL CONSERVATION I Cade: Site Code: ( `'7;„0 Name of Site: Southold Landfill Region: 1 CountSuffolk County: Town/City CutchoQue Street Address =north Road Status of Site Narrative: The Southold Landfill has been opeating con- tinuously . since 1951 at North Rd . in Cutchogue , NY . This facility accepts municipal and domestic wastes , demolition and landscaping debris , and cesspool and septic tank wastes . The Order on Consent dated May 16 , 1979 , established violations by the landfill operations of part 360 of 6 NYCRR. On August 31 , 1981 , the landfill was classi- fied as an open dump because it was found to be : (a) in non-compliance on safety (explosive gases heyund the. property boundary.) . LO CFR part 273 . 6 , and (b ) in violation of NYS (6NYCRR Part 703) ground water standards . On January 5 , 1982 , the Town of Southold which was not I yet in compliance with the Order on Consent was contacted by NYSDEC to set up a compliance monitoring conference . Type of Site: Open Dump Treatment Pond(s) Number of Fonds Landfill iCr Lagoon(s) 121 Number of Lagoons Structure Q Estimated Size 41 Acres Iaza: ous tastes Disposed'. Confirmed ,�'r Suspected ',Type and Quantity cf Hazardous Wastes: TT-GE QUANTITY (Pounds, drums, tons, gallons; PCB 1260 , Iron , Manganese , Unknown Chlorides , Copper and Zinc were detected in a well located on site . * Use additional sheets if more space is needed. I 11 II same of Current ewner of Site: .'own of Southolc ` Address of Current Owner of Site: Main Road . Southold , NY 11958 II Time Period Site Was Used for Hazardous Waste Disposal: II , 19 51 To Present , 19 85 Is site Active Q Inactive Q II (Site is inactive if hazardous wastes were disposed of at this site and site was closed prior to August 25, 1979) Types of Samples: Air Q Groundwater E:7 None L IISurface Water Q Soil Q Remedial Action: Proposed Q Under Design Q In Progress Q Completed Q Nature of Action: 1/ Status of Legal a.:t.loa; Order on Consent State Federal Q Permits Issued: Federal L:7 Local Government Q SPDES Q Solid Waste Q Mined Land Q Wetlands L Otte- 11 Assessment of Environmental Problems: Since PCB 1260 , Iron, Manganese , Copper and Zinc were detected in an II on site well , and also because some parameters such as chlorides (270 mg/ 1) , color (30) and TDS ( 1500 mg/1 ) were in excess of the maximum values allowed ; the potential exists for this contamination to reach drinking water supplies . TWo domestic wells are located IIapproximately 400 ft . south of the site . IIAssessment of Health Problems: Potential for contamination of private drinking water wells located IIin the vicinity of the site . II iPersons Completing this Form: Luis Rivas IWoodward-Clyde Consultants , Inc . April 5 , 1985 _ New York State Department of Environmental New York State Department of Heal_:, Conservation Date 111 I I 6/3/81 I RP`!:cl 1 1 � REFERENCE NO. 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation :1 Division of Solid/Hazardous Waste 111111110 Building 40, SUNY Stony Brook, New York 11794 NIMPF (516) 751-2617 Henry G.Williams Commissioner March 12, 1986 Francis J. Murphy, Supervisor Town of Southold Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Cutchogue Landfill/Scavenger Pits 11 Dear Mr. Murphy: Thank you for your letter of February 19, 1986, in which you asked if we have any closure requirements for the scavenger pits. In general, we normally require a scavenger waste pit to be excavated 11 to a reasonable depth to remove any grossly contaminated soil or .remaining sludge and dispose of it on a lined section of the landfill with immediate cover material applied. 11 As the Cutchogue Landfill is not lined, the above requirement would serve no purpose. We will require, however, that the pits be filled with clean fill to grade, clean fill being defined as sand or soil. Please do ' not use municipal solid waste, construction and demolition material, leaves or brush to fill in the pit. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Very truly yours,rrs (;)470...4. rtlr Paul M. Roth, P.E. 11 Regional Solid Waste Engineer PMR:dm cc: A. Anderson J. Conover I I I •a 1 1 1 � REFERENCE NO. 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 i i i 17-11111 !i 1111111 OK i i alli i i i' 1(I t.;1()(V ( YOH E I r./, I� TM la - , � DLPARTMENf OI ENVIRONMENTJsICONSERVAIIs)N ,j_ _ J 1111111/ DIVISION 01 SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE FACT IT NAME LOCAtION /t,`'' FACILITY INSPECTION REPORT11 / 2 /) li LEACIIAIE 1-i-., 4,1 �_ 1. leachate is entering surface water. PERS NS INIERVILWED AND IDLES f / ` ,I _ 2 leachate is known to be contravening groundwater standards. ;f'f r ��7 _/ 1, � [°„ 3. Waste is being placed Into water. r/j, /. i �1 / I r,' BURNING .:iF�lr / //�/ (/ / //C���i`A Irl',ll - • Cn4. Reluse is burning without permit or not under permit conditions -j� l�,: /// j II!, ,,, _ 5. lime Is evidence of unapproved previous burning. •. ( . r 1 COVER 'I• • I. �V+' - -(II °„ 6. Previous days waste is not coveted. S 7 Reluse is prutruding through daily, intermediate or final cover. SITE SKETCII ICOMMI N I S(additional sheets attached) ;;,� 8 Intermediate or(incl cover is not In place or properly applied s:, Dyes ❑No IIS - GRADING ;,I\yj i)ia „'',_ 9. Depressions, ponding, cracked cover, or slopes steeper than 1 on 3 exist. :1.:A;:: --/4-,-- 4.-- � J - 10. Vegetative cover is'missing or Inadequate on completed areas. '•K` / //c c �(J1 1'1, ;~ 11. Soil erosion or other drainage problems exist. 1. �i� / L �--r /?c,„' ,)C I S[PARAIION DISTANCES !J �_, /I _ s(• 12. Waste is closer Than 50 feet to site boundaries. 11 - / //6 / / �; i[ Fi placed less thanSfeet above groundwater or bedrock.• E 1 / //C/ //%(14. Waste is being placed too close to suilace water I, -------/ - I . " •1 nil _ / r 7�I _ fc, ie - -_---- NUISANCE CONDITIONS 1•,' F �/ c(`' //G •'/Y //� G" L//C • I,•1 - a _ 15. Odors are detectable oIl site. / • 1 _ 16. Wowing dust or dirt is a nuisance. •'s �� ( 1 g 17. l'apers are uncontrolled or blowing off site. 1,iU)/ , _ /.; ,�� 18. Noise is a nuisance off site. .ri!.iJ/(J/t (� ///�J/l(�jr/c , ///L ,,,--77,; 1. , - OPERATION CONTROL 1. / r l �_ 19. Ulceration Permit conditions are being violated.(List conditions) r.'.' t',.; , l� 20 Waste is not sufficiently confined or controlled. IJ'• .fit: ,! SS'/�t-" - _ 21. Refuse Is spread In layers thicker than 2 feet. +1 .•1 ../.12 U 1/_ /��(( / I r, - /22. Refuse Is not compacted or compacted Insullidently. 1• �� / I / (� - /23. the working(ace height Is greater than 10 feet. ;a j _ �� / " 1 �./ - VI 24. Equipment on the site is not adequate for proper operation. ' 12 / / /./ 6, 11 ^ SAFETY AND IIEAIiIt r-Llr ///- // �/ / ifS �F/�V l" l'• 4 rt.. �. _ ,^ 25. Salvaging is uncontrolled or Is creating a safety hazard. y.'.• ,. . - 26. Rodents,insects, buds,or other vectors are not controlled �I� _ v' '^ _ _ 27. Unsafe conditions or equipment exist.(list items){ ' • / > �- +I i M 28. Methane gas is known to be leaving the site. r11'"tt!f�//((.) C'_ /3 �(� J 6f _///,/� cS c ,_` , , i'. ACCESS CONTROL •'(P' / _ 1j +. -- -� 29. Access to the site is Improper, unsafe, or Inadequately controlled ''• ''''!• 1.--- ' -7117,--- /- /' , ' ��jw ' r 30. the site Is open without an attendant 1 /- /�C r r 1' l'iU-•' - 31. Information about,the site is not posted.(e.g,hours of operation) . � -�-- / - _ 1 '0 V rri -. o - 32. Access to the operating area is poor or unsale. : .i-i.• 7 , / Iii ///////tjy .C/ / / // o I ' .., o- - 33. Uncontrolled leachate is visible on, or near the site. / 1 ---• rs / - 34. the quality of cover material Is inadequate. •'31.1/// ti� • (k-Cly-}K) Z/ C+• ` L' I• s-- 35. Slope of working lace is steeper than 1 on 3. ,, ( I/67 ( k Ss n A / (1 dFr.'L //� / - t, -• �/‘7.(....)// I,t ) „ 36. Monitoring wells are not operative. f_ ) t t .) '� 37. Unapproved wastes have been deposited since last Inspection. • • t ( i^ _I- / a rr11 IL ,,) �; 38. Operator Is unfamiliar with site boundaries, operation plan or permit. 11 / / / / �C�-. ,`� �:j 39. Land application 01 waste to(rozeni'snow covered ground or during periods of , : •: /1 i."'( ////, ) /7/ L / 1• rain. s r-� J (1 I It,\ H 40. Soil pll Is below 6.5. 1.,1.14 . 11 7Y :(1/ u e. --A ..,gy m. , , .� 1T , 144. 1. 1.1 I t. . a - REGIONAL OFFICE COPY ?�7:'! �� 1 \ ��„� `e ,1 r.1 v ' ); . `� I SPECIUR�5.Md-4 TURF T' l I;4 ' #.:4.1 / / 1/ 1 , s s 1 1 1 1 1 � REFERENCE Na. 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 111111 UM IOUS MI 111111 ION MIN IN 11111 MI SIMI SIN 11111 SIN 11111 11111 111111 111111 MI1 . KtL:1°N ' : I a NEW YORK STALE 47-15'1 19/831 1 r•r 1 _ 1)1I'ARIMENT ()I INVIRONM(NIAI CONSIKVAIION j",,! ' a'�1 1 ' DIVISION HI SOI II) AND IIA/AKI)OU)LVAsit .'Ih IACIIIIYNAMI It)(,\j (ttN - -- • I / 14. �� FACILITY INSPECTION REPORT )1 " • 1� i l -7 j , , 2//(' f/ � /, `-- [�/C" // i��r/.!;:. lEAC11ATE --- _ .i_ ' - \'41t ) ) I'IRSONS IN TIHVII WIT)ANI) 111115 CS 1 Tear kite a enlenng surlat a wad•r. 1 r . t 'a'41 _.-- [T _ /2 Tear hale is known III In•rontl.wenutg K'11undw.der 11.11Ja1 Is `J�` �!, h//L /�,'(, ! //�•-�'//��/� f,,'r' ,, ,�,~ .((rl, .n \/ ) Waste Is being plated into water. `.. 1�Z ,.. It1l1 __ 1 BURNING -�j,1. :1 _ s 4 Refuse is burning without penult 11r not under pennd t unddusm.,I 1 r ! _ .n Thele is echlence ul unapproved lowed •ta•vulus bwnua• 1• . 1 �� 1 1 1 ti ..1 l' 11 i 11 - COVER 'i,,' 7 -- II'aA - ; I/6 Previous days waste n RIii lovwed •1` • SIIE SKI I(I1/(_(MIA%I NIS Iadddlunal shep.Illrlhedl Yes I_1 Nu T'I • - 7. Keluse is protruding thnn•gh daily. 101rn11141 le 11I 1111,11 lover. m.,I., wi, -- 8 Intermct6Jle or final(over Is rt111•n plate or pr/1pelly applied. '' rt. Y' I GRADING L) ".1 a ) • �'/� i • % ♦ 1' .4 I .44' i /% • ) , 1. .'•iit rn 9. Depressions,pond•pg.cracked(over.or slopes sleeper than 1 on13 exist- 10 Vegetrove cover 1s nussing Of inadequate on I11n1pla and JreJS t )\ - a!- IAL n 11 Sod erosion or(KIWI dlamrge pwblenn esnt ;Sir: •GJ /�4 ,/" ...// / ✓i �j /',����1' �� [i/ -), �( y/, it "�I _ 1 SEPARATION DISTANCES ;.j ..1 ..- -- J . u�1 12. Waste is closer Than 50 Teel w she Illtundrnes io • 1> .//I/ t7� i* jC. /�t � ' /Jr t j:•'/;i/ ''� .. 13. Rrlux a being placed less then S Teel above gruundwaa•r 111 ha•droek:; �) Y JJ�a/ �� �r a14 Waste is being I11.0 eel 11111 close III suiIJl a wails 4 + / . 7,7 �.�-r lilt � ' NUISANCE CONDITIONS �f J /_.I'// //,/�!'.i///t/e-7 ii.: < �� q IS. (k1uHJrc delecl.Iblc ill site. !: yi . /.1• r F r 16. Bluwln dust or dol Is r nonan/e ••h, ("1' f / �; r l� v 17. ('iters are unulnlndlyd tit blowing 1111 site a t �l �� /� ✓ /' / __ f, �' q 18. Noise is a nuisance 1111 site. 1.a i • , _,- . 't• i•l 1. 1 . OPERATION CONTROL • ''i"' (tel /�// .) i� '/ J ._ . i 1 19 OIwrruuo Perms[11ndlUum are being undated 11111(nndiulnsl�. pg r• : J / 1'e i 414,�/�/!i%•✓ Csil� :•7�f,''1✓r!�/,t-// Y r. r XII• s 20 Waste Is not sulfic lenlly confined or 1 un1ru11ed d i'I I �� - �r q\-•. 21. Ketose is spu•Jd•n layers Out kyr Than 1 Teel. i� : I l,+</!"e /�.>/k/./ •/1//(/- ((1//(_('+ /•.7 i,)C` f.,/2/- n r•- 22. Refuse Is na colnpMM Led or compacted'sought �.' 1 / _f �- .7 .' / ,r 1 2). The working lace helgM n hItJler Ihrn 111(cel. ��•',t'�. l��c"t/t ` ` ' / /:.. 1. 1 r) 24. Egwpment on the site n nor adequate lir limper operation. 'irk;„,• ✓�,/��/�JL�//�fi/• S ,A/1,--•%( ti' i Fr SAFETY AND 11EA1T11 I, ; � / _ ! ) / r •''• 1\ AV 25. Salvaging n unl lntlnllled III n treating J s.dely harm& '11 ,' • - c. / . {//f (� O///! l ,•'[ <" .; 1 • 26 Rodents.Insects buds or abet vectors arc nil uuuudlod. / - / .► -f _ ao : / / /c/ �./ ,/ •■ 1 •m res 27. l►nsrlr conditions or e m unenl cant.Il IA 11 sl I G /4/17//e'''‘'. (.' /. . / i q 1 ,J• � n. ,�' . may/ . �' • `'t i..--1 N1 28. Methane gas Is known lis lie leaving the site. e ,a•r _� a ACCESS CONTROL �• `'I' .1 /l �i[:r� .'$( "/)) L / �.// / _ (�'t4 � '1).' ^ 29 Acct»to the site n uuprulN•r,un,rlo III•nrdequrlrly conuulled.• `1.1• / ,• r -• :( r• 111 The silt is open without an attendant ••. 11. Inl.onlauon about the sic Is nut posted. le g.. pools of 11per4l on) ).‘11... / i F - r'1 32. Access lis the 1111a•Ntrllg rlea n poor or unsafe. rr j;yao.r; (f4-141::- ''/1' C� / 4 C.f //V�Y /� ! (,-r •// r 1 ‘/ 0•'^ iv )1. Uncontrolled lerchalt is unable on•of near the sic F � /�/1 (//�//7 75 -) ')(7,..-) / / r r ."� y 34. The quality/d UIVe1 IIIJICIIJI n Inadegwle ?� i 11•• . `� 35. Slide ul working lac e n steeper than 1 on I. I. ',, I �l+ /l it ' /f !' �/. JJ .(';',.;),-=7-,, ,'�./ . '.I J-A/� 11+ - 1 .' ' • (/..J /1. / / 4�/i S. /�•. • . / „.•,-;.;:.", -! V, d 36. Munionng wells are nil opelruvc. r r.4,• ! "• �..� / /� i vn `� 37. Unapproved wastes have been deposited since last inspection. v� 1 1^ 7--)e/r /1 r. / n L 38. (°maim is unlamilarr with site boundaries.opeirhun plan or pe,..,... r / �� ��fV ! 39. land applicalion of wade to 1111ren/snuw covered ground to duripgperkotls of '�''� f/ / / X....1 7 ,ikY rain. ,. / 4 e: /� ///L'`�C.% N, / / v it, ry N 40. Sud p11 Is below 6.S. t Is' .i O< ^ 1 r i I I t • .111"'"INSPICTOR'S-• GNAIURE / O w Oto 1 1 1 1 � REFERENCE NO. „ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' Prepared by : Brian Coyle Date : 2anuary 79 , 1957 I Town of Southold Cutchooue Landfill Facility Number 52 -S-17 ' Pertinent Information inactive : Hazardous Waste Site No . 15202 , ( 2A ) Location : North Road , Cutchooue Supervisor : Frank Murphy tate Opened : 1950 ' Permit Expired : April 22 , 1985 Consent Order : insufficient 11 Site Description ' 35 acres unlined 2 scavenger waste pits on North West_ Si de --- Composting in center---" --- -- -- 11 5 acres sand mining on North Easte side Salvacing area Public Drop-off Site STOP Program Groundwater Monitoring System Groundwater Direction NNW ' The Cutchooue landfill is located outside of the deep recharge zone and is nearing capacity. to natural grade . The sand mining pit of 5 acres shall be considered for landfilling before going above grade . The landfill is a ( 2a ) site and is highly suspected by the department ' s records of having had hazardous waste dumped in the septage pits . Also , the site has contravened groundwater standards . The existing operation has an enclosed public crop-off center . The existing septage pits no longer accept waste due to ' the new- Greenport Sewage Treatment plant . The salvage area has grown immensely and is in violation of Part 360. The landfilling operaton isn ro ebeimproved i .�me . roc1_y -,anac _d and needs s t o immediately . II 1 I Town of Southold Cutcnooue Lanafiil Facility Numoer 5.2 -S - 17 Important steps are necessary for the Town of Southold to comply with the Environmental Conservartion Laws , they are : I . Consent Order upgrading operations assuring proper closure and determining the final elevation of the landfill 2 . Phase II Investigation 3 . Permit for composting facility ' Proper closure of the septaae pits 5 . Steps toward a proven Resource Recovery facility . ( Please see atachments for maps and inspection reports . ) I 3C : Jf Attachments 1 1 I II 1 1 1 . 1 I REFERENCE NO. 12 f*- - Jew York State Department-o ervdtiun 41111111L--- Division of Solid & Hazardous Waste gibe Building 40 , SUNY Stony Brook , NY 11794 NIFF Henry G.Williams ( 516 ) 751 -7900 - Commissioner I February 10 , 1987 The Honorable Francis J . Murphy Supervisor , Town of Southold Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold , NY 11971 Dear Supervisor Murphy : ' Please be advised that after further consideration and evidence recently brought to my attention that hazardous wastes may have been dumped in the scavenger waste pits located on the northwest side of Cutchogue landfill , I must rescind my letter of March 12 , 1986 . The Department ' s position is that it would be in the best ' interests of the Town and the environment to leave the pits untouched until a proper study of this situation has been Mi completed . If you should have any further questions , please do not hesitate to contact me . 5 Sincerely , 11 00.4,t C/Cfr Paul M . Roth , P . E . Regional Solid Waste Engineer IL. PMR : BC : jf cc : Ray Jacobs R . Becherer B . Coyle 1 r 1 REFERENCE NO. 13 E 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I GRC,...,D IHolzmacher, McLendon and Murrell, P.C. • H2M/Ragold, Inc. • H2M Labs, Inc. -5 Broad Hollow Road, Melville, N.Y. 11747-5076 =16) -56-8000 • (201) 575-5400 IApril 14, 1987 � p f2 l5 IQdR i Mr. Robert Becherer APR I Solid Waste Division vl F____________11 DIV1SlONOFSOl1D&HAZn,�r^1987 �, 11 New York State Department of NYSOECREGION 1 `/ASTE. Environmental Conservation SUNY Campus, Building 40 I Stony Brook, New York 11794 Re: Southold Scavenger Waste Lagoons Dear Mr. Becherer: Pursuant to the request of Supervisor Murphy, I am enclosing ana- IIlytical data for five grab samples taken from the scavenger waste lagoons at the Cutchogue Landfill . As indicated on the enclosed sheet, the samples were taken on December 21, 1984; March 12, IIJune 13 , October 2 and December 30, 1985 . The Town of Southold is requesting approval to pump the liquid II contents of the lagoons to the top of the working face of the landfill , to be added with chipped wood, leaves and compost. Please advise the Town and our office as to whether this is ac- ceptable to your office. I/ Should you have any questions concerning the enclosed, please contact me at your convenience. 11 Very truly yours, HOLZMACHER, McLENDON & MURRELL, P.C. E4"..---46..e4iV Gary E. Loesch, P.E. II GEL:mad Enclosures 11 cc: Supervisor Francis J. Murphy II Raymond L. Jacobs 1 Melville. N.Y. • Riverhead.N.Y. •Fairfield.N.J. NOUMACHER, McLEN00N and MURRELL. P.C. • CONSULTING ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS and PLANNERS 125 BAYLIS ROAD. SUITE 140, MELVILLE. N.Y. 11747 • S16752.9030 I April 17 , 1985 I Mr. Rodney Douglas, Sanitation Supervisor Department of Public Works Town of Southold Peconic Lane Peconic , New York 11958 Re : Southold Scavenger Waste Lagoon SORT 83-02 Dear Mr. Douglas: Pursuant to our telephone conversation, I am enclosing dupli- cate copies of the analyses performed on the samples obtained from the scavenger waste lagoon. Please contact me if I can be of further assistance . IIN 9 Very truly yours , It HOLZMACHER, MCLENDON' & MURRELL, P.C. p F �M Gary E. Loesch, P. E. II s CL ✓ PT :AD IIVOJ GEL:mad •�:: Enclosures likvcrt �rw:fT •CCT I rP` FILE rC1-71 Merin* Mm.Vern•fe erepeeN.%we Vero•0•-q..1 p4 .,•.van IHOLZMACHER. McLENOON ono MURRELL P.0 • CONSULTING ENGINEERS. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS and PLANNERS_` 575 BROAD HOLLOW ROAD. MELVILLE.N.Y. 11747• 516-694-3040 I/ CLIENT NAME AND ADDRESS Lab No. 467336 Town of-Southold II Catchogue Scavenger Waste Site Harry Goldman Water Analysis Main Road SPDES Permit #NY-0103446 Mattituck, NY 11922 Sampling Pt. Scavanger Waste Lagoon Taken @ 0820 Hrs. 11 Date Sampled 12/21/84 Collected By CL 99 11 VOLATILE HALO TED u9/1 vinyl chloride < 1 dichlorodifluoromethane < 1 II methylene. chloride < 1 trichlorofluoromethane < 1 1 , 1-dichloroethylene < 1 1 , 1-dichloroethane • < 1 II trans-1 ,2-dichloroethylene < 1 cis-1 ,2-dichloroethylene < 1 chloroform < 1 Ii , I ,2-trichlorotrifluoroethane < 1 1 ,2-dichloroethane < 1 1 , 1 , 1-trichloroethane < 1 11 carbon tetrachloride < 1 brarlodichlororr>Athane < 1 1 ,2-dichloropropane < 1 2,3-dichloropropene < 1 II trans-1 ,3-dichloropropene < 1 trichloroethylene < 1 1 , 1 ,2-trichloroethane < 1 11 chlorodibrarrsnethane < 1 cis-I ,3-dichloropropene < 1 bramoform < 1 II * 1 , 1 , 1 ,2-tetrachloroethane < 1 -tetrachloroethylene 2 1 , 1 ,2,2-tetrachloroethane chlorobenzene < 1 1 .VOLATILE NON--HALCGENA►TED benzene 3 toluene 22 ethylbenzene 1 ii m-xylene 1 *sp-xylene - ,-.-- -,111 (o-xylene 1 *Reported value represents total. ******************* II : ******** Date Reported: 1/16/85 S.C. McLendon, P.E. Laboratory Director I • IMom,N,-,Tort•i•m*190•M.Now Von•a.•.•N.•e N .••n ; :J 'll. ql Engineers&Scientist; • I , ' :.�:s•' y fi::'LE DOyind MURRELJ�'dP�. LABORATORY ''' r', ;'� i • 6 64- E VIL`hE N W'YO 1747 1 9 1040 A. , 1. 1 6 • M K >: = rr,- • ..{'e ,,t,I: .1.. �, :: ,q •,I' , .• • . REPORT ; L. , WATtw •• • - ,,,,p ' ,1,� a •SE1Nt11A0E•TREAtMENT•ECOLOGICAL•IMPACT STUDIES • • LABS M,Q• 4,4,T '+ ff,,',4:',..... ' •• .. Tt� WANTS WAT411 LAISORATOAY AND ANALYTICAL SERVICES p +• •• , " t r, ,.. `1 �v;' • * i 1'• • ' TYPE OF •SAMPLE - MISCELLANIEOU8 it.E , CQLL1'ECTED` $1r'=C�.f 194iri� .,, r t ti} :; s 1,• 1. -aDATE COLLECTED - 12/21/84 �:j 1 DWIE RECI IyED + 1'2/?6/84 !". ; 1,. .„.,) ( • E , 1 ry �, "; .i i'.• ,�� •• .1 i '• . ' i. 1 • A� � . ' :.„ •• -•t.:',1,"; - QUTCMOGUE`.SCAVENGER' WA TE 6ITE ��'• ,'• A YlPDEB P RM I T • 0103 6 • r• : :BCAVENOER WASTE LAGOON k �., '' • .� ;+ s NA tir �! %I �Z� TOWN OP 80UTHOLD y' ; L'..! i A• , i • • 1•? • . • •PARAM i. . i E �' • i i i i ; f PHE OLS• .0 0[ sq . l • • i.•I . t • , , ,'r li•' �a , +•r,���i,�•a•,(.•orf •I'1•`�:„r- i t '• .1I :1 - ' /^' •f •w• + .�- Cpl•• , '.� 4.�• � ;t.. 1' • 1 • ! r 1 '• :t • , • • 1 7 1 •••. j ,•• ••• t 1.. •cit 11 4.4''.• • •• r ` I w fl 1' 1 h , • If • • • 1: . . ,r /i�/K. ., i• • f r' • rt•,'.. 'i I • .;, 1 •i ,•1 t •�1�, i 1w ,Viii1 I. �,;�, „d w 1r,d �`.r. �}` • 1 _ • F • • (. • T••• 1 • t , 1 P' feVr i I •1 S• '*�i'L✓ ♦..$'.i.1.f scl uT/r0L` —,..v ....... M •F - • ( • • 1 •(1 (C,!, • 1L,1 F. • • LL, •• t,L+,,`t,'?4 `4ri" 4 �/, TkD SY )�00/4I, R,.X (PERCENT). ANJ .i ,, r• `0 Yy r. ,y� '': tiQONI) , •a, • . ,li:$ .w: ',,� $ DACE• REPQ*T 1I .•�lh�j,►i1 BS,,�1 • ••L'. ...Fa �' '.:$ .'. '. pk:'OUNTS/MLf}' ' •1; : -t ' ° i• ►, •T,k+ ' • 11 , 1 _ 1 . 1.a.;''..f,• T OLIDS(ML/L) - • S. .MCLENDON" .•.•� . ! '.I1 . t •F . - . ,1�;1u► • TORT DIRECTOR I LI 1 Y"4 $ • t'� ', a• .P 5 OWED TO THE.e111ct OF THS sanv,cE IlEN0111ICIANNPAID. • 1 ••• 1► / I � 1•f • N III I ihiMii HOLZMACHER. MCLENDON anti MURRELL P.C. • CONSULTING ENGINEERS, R ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS and PLANNERS 125 BAYLIS ROAD,SUITE 140, MELVILLE. N.Y. 1174? • 516.752.9060 I/ May 3 , 1985 MAy - 61985 Mr. Rodney Douglas , Sanitation Supervisor . . .. .- _._. . . i II Department of Public Works Town of Southold Peconic Lane 1 Peconic, New York 11958 Re: Southold Scavenger Waste Lagoon I SORT 83-02 Dear Mr. Douglas: • I Pursuant to our telephone conversation, I am °enclosing a copy of the volatile halogenated/volatile non-halogenated organic analyses performed on the sample obtained from the scavenger II waste lagoon on March 12 , 1985 . This information, in conjunc- tion with the phenol concentration of 10 ug/l , should be filed with the New York State Department of Environmental Conserva- tion .. I Please contact me if you require any further information. IIVery truly yours, HOLZMACHER, McLENDON & MURRELL, P.C. I ....,,,.!(.5.19 .........se'°- . I/ , Gary E. Loesch, P.E. IIGEL:mad Enclosure cc: ✓Supervisor Francis J. Murphy (w/encl. ) - Superintendent Raymond C. Dean (w/encl. ) I . i . MOLJMACMER. McLENDON acid MURRELL. P.0 • CONSULTING ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTAL SC;ENTISTS ano PLANNERS 57S BROAD$OLLOW ROAD.MELVILLE. N.T. 11747 • S164544040 ICLIENT NAME AND ADDRESS II Harry Goldman Water Analysis Lab. No. 553443 Main Rd. Type Water Misc. Town of Southold lattituck, NY 11922 SaTpling Pt. Scavenger Waste Lagoon SPDES Permit# NY 0103446 - Cutchogue Scavenger Waste I Date Sampled 3/12/85 Site Collected By CL 99 I VOLATILE HALOGENATED ua/1 vinyl chlorine < 3 di chlorodiflucro:rethane < 3 - methylene chloride < 3 II trichlorofluoromethane < 3 1 , 1-iichloroethylenet. < 3 1 , 1-dichloroethane < 3 I trans-1,2-dichloraethylene < 3 cis-1 ,2-iichloroethylerle < 3 chloroform < 3 II 1 , 1 ,2-trichlorot.rifluoroethane < 3 1 ,2-dichloroeth.ane < 3 1, 1 , 1-trichl oroe=}ane < 3 carbon tetrachloride < 3 II bramdichloromethane < 3 1 ,2- ichloropropane < 3 2,3-dic.. loropropene < 3 II trans-1,3-dichloroprorene < 3 trichloroethylene < 3 1 ,1 ,2-trichloroethane < 3 11 chlorcoibrorcr ethane < 3 cis-1 ,3- .ichloropropene i < 3 • brorrof orrn < 3 1,1, 1,2-tetrachloroethane < 3 II tetrachloroethylene < 3 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane < 3 chlorobenzene < 3 II VOLATILE NON-HALOGENATED D benzene < 3 ' toluene < 3 li ethylbenzene < 3 il m-xylene < 3 • o-xylene < 3 p-xylene < 3 * Reported value represents total. e****************** * P/1.40.---1 * I/ Gate Reported: 5/1/85 S.C. !McLendon, P.E. Laboratory Director 11 H.....•,.......•IyimmM.y,Mw••n•4w••...C.Mw Van 111.8t I4OL2MACHER. McLENDON end MURRELL. P.C. • CONSULTING ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS and PLANNERS 125 BAYLIS ROAD, SUITE 140, MELVILLE. N.Y. 11747 • 516-752.9060 I 1 June 28 , 1985 • - 2185 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Rodney Douglas Sanitation Supervisor Department of Public Works Town of Southold Pecgnic Lane Peconic, New York 11958 Re: Southold ScavencQr Waste Lagoon 11 SOHT 83-02 Dear Mr. Douglas: Pursuant-to our telephone conversation, I am enclosing a copy of the volatile halogenated/volatile non-halo..enated organic/ 11 phenol analyses performed on the sample obtained from the scavenger waste lagoon on June 13 , 1985 . This data should be filed with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Please contact me if you require any further information. Very truly yours, HOLZMACHER, McLENDON & MURRELL, P.C. I Gari E. Loesch, P. E. 11 GEL:mad Enclosures cc: ✓Supervisor Francis J. Murphy (w/encl. ) Superintendent Raymond C. Dean (w/encl. ) 1 I u.,•.•4• ••.ren•i..ww.pe.•. Nem•e.. ••.•••w..• M..Yen IL. . jui .. .. ._ . r• _, MOL2MACMER. MCLENOOP •no MURRELL P.0 • CONSULTING ENGINEERS. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS and PLANNERS STS BROAD HOLLOW ROAD. MELVILLE. N.T. 11747•516-694.3040 ICLIENT NAME AND ADDRESS Harry Goldman Water Analysis Lab. No. 557794 11 Main Rd. Water Misc. - Town of Southold Mattituck, NY 11922 -Sampling Pt. Scavenger Waste Lagoon - 0820 Hrs. SPDES Permit tNY-0103446 Date Sampled 6/13/85 Collected By D 99 VOLATILE HALCC DATED ug/1 11 vinyl chloride < 1 dic.*>lorodifluorarethane < 1 methylene chloride < 1 li trichlorofluoromethane < 1 1 , 1-dichloroethylene < 1 1 , 1-dichloroethane < 1 trans-1 ,2-dichloroethylene < 1 II cis-1 ,2-dichloroethylene < 1 chloroform 44 ..- 1 , 1 ,2-trichlorotrifluorcethane < 1 II 1 ,2-dictlioroethane < 1 1 , 1, 1-trichloroethane 15 carbon tetrachloride < 1 11 brarodichlorasethane < 1 1 ,2-dichloropropane < 1 2,3-dichloropropene < 1 trans-1 ,3- ichloropropene < 1 I/ trichloroethylene < 1 1 , 1 ,2-trichloroethane < 1 chlorodibrcrcrethane < 1 11 cis-1 ,3-d.ichloropropene..., < 1 bzaTof orm < 1 1 , 1; 1,2-tetrachloroethane < 1 II tetrachloroethylene < 1 1 ,1 ,2,2-tetrachloroethane < 1 chlorobenzene < 1 VOLATILE TED . enzene < 1 toluene 4 ethylbenzene < 1 11 m-xylene < 1 o-xylene < 1 p-xylene < 1 11 * Reported value represents total. ******************* . IIDate Reported: 6/28/85 S.C.. McLendon, P.E. • Laboratory Director , I II160w•• ... vs,•f•nww.p*•,•.••w.en•iM.••••r.Iwo,•w SI ON a me on as sa mpg as ea as ipm am - Environmental Engineers & Scientists HOIIMACHER. UcLENOON and MURIMEL . P C LABORATORY 375 BROAD HOLLOW ROAD,MELVILLE.NEW YORK 1 I 71l (516) 694-3040 REPORT WATER RESOURCES•WATER SIMPLY a TREATMENT•SEWERAGE a TREATMENT•ECOLOGICAL E IMPACT STUDIES LAP HO• %r MODEL STUDIES a PILOT PLANT STUDIES aWATER/WASTE WATER LABORATORY AND ANAL VVOCAL SEIIVICES n�in irf li ,L CLIENTS NAME ANDAOOt1E$$1 ME or SPIIriL M1':.crl..IANEO(IF ` •COLLCI.TED RI r' • DALE ( OLLILTE.P - •S/ 13/133 DATE RECEIVED 6/14:85 HARRY OOLDMAN WATER ANALYSIS fall CHfhiIIi SCAVENGER WASTE SITE MAIN RD SMS urFM1 I $ NI - 0103444 6CAVENSER UASTF LA000N MATTITUCK, NY 11922 TOUN OF SOUTHOLD r01. 1r. :Trf, ^f.'�^ VPS . _ F. !AM • - r iFq RFsUI • PHENOLS <4.001 • • 1 I • • • REMARKS - OEL ALL RESULTS IN (110/1) EXCEPT AS NOTED DY I ( UO/1 ) OR (PEPCFIIT ) AND T .COLI PACT. 1 FECAL COLT (MPR/10OlL ) DATE REPORTED 6/2fl/' COLOR. ODOR, TURBIDITY 1 PH (UNITS ) I APC 1 FECAL STREP (COUNTS/ML ) t .� ! .10 6PEC .COND. (MOOS) 9ETT . 90LIDS(ML/L ) // �E .LA S.C.AAcCEND�;►.[..LAOORATORV DIRECTOR i 1_11A I $OLZMACHER.. McLENDON and MURRELL P.0 • CONSULTING ENGINEERS. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS ana PLANNERS 575 BROAD HOLLOW ROAD, MELVILLE N.Y. 11747•518-004.3040 1 Harry Goldman Water Analysis Sample Lab No. 562182 Main Rd. Date Collected: 10/2/85 II Mattituck, NY 11922 Date Received: 10/2/85 Type: Misc. - C utchogue Scavenger Waste site Additional Sample Info. • SPDES Permit #NY-0103446 - T. of Southold Collected By: CS, 99 Scavenger waste lagoon 0820 hrs. IANALYTICAL.RESULTS Compound ug/1 vinyl chloride < 1 methylene chloride < 1 11 1 , 1-dichioroethane < 1 chloroform < 1 1 , 1 , 1-trichloroethane < 1 . 1 ,2-dichloropropane < 1 II trichloroethylene < 1 tetrachloroethylene < 1 , chlorobenzene < 1 11 ) benzene < 1 toluene < 1 m-xylene < 1 II o-xylene < 1 p-xylene < 1 o-dichlorobenzene < 1 1/ Results reported meet N.Y.S. Drinking Water Limits. IIDate Reported: 10/16/85 I/ . S , P.E. tory Director 1 •1 II I WtiMr.NO. ll•i•.www�.N.'.Ye.••11••••14•,•<1N..Vora :- • f r .i I 1 I�'f E�tvi� ta�nbl�npiRsen Scientists i1 r.,t'•F.: ' i!'v�'•C.,: �, �r(yh i... f. f.lin Wim' -1 I •1 'I � • e 1 Pi 1 r t t Y r. �'y jfv �, 7, . ' �►� "n ,) "'HOL'L'MAf�HEFtfM LENDON And MURREL[%RF�10;` ;rri� L ' D !1T�c� r g.�:,,u-'_ i k.. .Cf• { '•• I.,' 1 r 1.1 V ,'I. $75; I•19LLQW ROAD,MgLVII.L•E.NEIN YORK 1174#4 161 6944046":':,..4‘,?.. '' e d'I•rt '. '' www"' '! ,/' P..y • •, . `fn� • �• ;!, ."64" ,• • 1i . ►. '� :?1' t'. ��1'.l. el ^ •^,� s' .•{! 1�,�+ � , �. ' WWII" Ef w ATEI1 s1JrP1.M A TREATMENT•SEWERAGE E TREATMENT• ECOLOGICAL L IMPACT STUDIES . • - P ill . + " ,.v.,...44,.:4-.::: ' >`• 1 d r Mt "' •'., i 4111 -'� kA. ,?'I b 21 R 3 1 '!'{I-MdQ� st. Ls•wLOT PLANT STUDIES•WATER/WASTE!NAVIN LAEORATORY AND ANALVTICAL'3SAVICES • • /I"f ',0• , '' 4 y � ' !'1, `. ' h ;'!!"o? • at .'.) -w ; <<. ,:, ' TYPE ��• .#A� � fn,xaaEt:�,AN�nu�' ►, ti,' • ; N,* ► inn BY�Ci al. 9 v cl 'r,l 1 1 ' 1 ' DATE Cpi.i i:' ! 1( / ;1 1,'!'0 r ' w, r ' + 1= in: 13,i#.44.1,1,'' i �', , 4 rift itY',:0111.1111AM ,MATER .ANALltA.V11 t, • :; �'"1$ ;f' , :per 14."r'r;c '� ',' t : I, ;i' '' 1 .hc'' a• �•. . .I ,I , • CUTIHAQI��': it(.,�k i_ I' A111.' 'J � :i„ ' si�+- - S , 061..- •0". „' :'11P111 D �PnFIt PERMIT „4 �14 11# ' .�, <t d l' r . '� ' 1• ' I " SCAltdlintil WAIttF I.AQAON 'I V t' I 31 .•11 •T TT11CK, Ny •,11922 • i . TOWN "OF RDUTHOI.D i...if. • `_t ,� - • r t .� r '� '. i i t.I 1.* . • !-.`e' 1.4Yy .r t E, ; 11. • '•1 • ,ed' 1� .I • 1 II• . ' •' ',� i'• •� ` r ,1 '{ L(` } '�- ,•4..' � �` Y1•. 1 1SI • ��''' ita,>f 1: 'RE IILT - • •. . ••:t 1 •'•l,+ .t•••..1,a,. i1 • ;,,• I: .��s_ ..,;III•::: "� `•'lr,.,`..., 0. k . k( '. • •1 . p 'Ab. •r r - 1 �►, , •Nit. • ,1 1 � �a i' . '� ��• : .1„;yi� � ,. j ,� *Ly1 J••(11� 7 a,1 i2.'S .i ,• f' � r' I "�{_pF►��.•t I 1 • i; •�I , ' x 1 '`�'' �' 1.•• S`11(Ir ..t .>bl• .. n` j'1 .'+�F , ct.rs t •,•i•1' .,I I �• 1 1 : " 1 1 f r ,l~ J , :t 1 'T'"J , r i. •'If ' • .{ ;. Sf'.4 t :( 1.- •14.000 1• ' ' • �• - •••• ifs / •Mg 1 j t .r.- G 1' 1 ! 7 C v ` u ....w' ' 1 /// ).i. •'i 'u'•a.�••` i 1 1 •y{ I,,• e p • l 1 .1 %' • 1' :i •`*1 �1-. i•� 1 n '� • ` ` l 3J ,� r, t 1 • .,,11! jl ,-, to IJ . �• '�f�, ,j • • E,. ••`t 1 1 IT •' 1 1 f r• 1. tr t , •J•I1• L I .t•; .I1 i . . 1 1 . • �•'r ,�t y . f I } • l ' fit,. 7? . •� , • )' ' ;•1•• •' • '. ,•1 `, l..?iitP .4 . r Aljrg •.� Xw �` ,1. I 7 15}: '1 o. v 1 (,. • • • • •• 1 I}�'• •••7.,,,,... ,.-;,:r.,-. r� , •„ • t 1 1 .. ` _ 11�d • 4, " i =•1 ( ' •I , ♦ l s.119 �r`. y'' 14/'�y� v / ,,,,,,,,400‘.%,--,F.7:--,7",,. _ if ' ti. i 1 x , 1 K, • t.. v •1 HI . • I i ' a .'1,.• , i, . }11r�'. F4 '"'' • i O -7 � , 1:' •A1 �- a• .91. ... _ 1 b. .1 . . • 1 � ll': .1 .. , •- k ' fI,it:file,;..•' .4 I• ., . -HI•. . I . 1.. a ( ..• ',r- } IM ''• Cr,'/. . .' r 1 i i,'w lir , r;• '.t w:4q . s$11 „.• : c •. .{..: :1r 4 1...1%:::: , ' . . - 1 t :I~ f'- 1 , tar fi.'4; till ;.', 7 .., •t$• 1 .,,.,,-,... - i .••• • - :.... . i ..• ., ',pi, •• • 4".. .‘...-!!•;,•••.).\,n.:itotte f...'', .i,. ..r.i; -•,. . , . : •.' . •• ,11,c1/4 : 1 �� gel. •, • j. �• 1 1 a �1 ' }, .tt . J i ,y , 'd.•.1;_u{1,�Iy.S.•j.•t i ..Y, t '�• .( 1 1 ,, , ' r y ,• '�r�•I7 • •��• ? 'r•� 1 '� ' IY. v •.. •• N'•• , 4 .•,' y9..`' ..'i I 1 .. , ,r -+i^'1 �i ri' . .� ;' d'',0,1,. J!•( •*� ..• • I • ' t .y I 1 rIY' 7• .1 �tK* Jrl ,I)! . 'I 1r • ,�., VI 1 i 7.4.. lPCS 'I. 1r,.pI1 11 To IIF.I. / T/ l�All'TH111.D �'..; •• .'/'If'�< +IT 4I �. i' M : .; ,d.1 . .fir. • 1'•� f' S awIli:- `�7(•'� • ' r'r} ' �,�'T•• , • II'�1�.1:r: 1 '. t yt �•: a 1��''1 S i l Jl.�.,f AI !" h ., K ; rAHI:S-Mflil.'1.�j 1VT h/�9 N• ATE! ' Y•' I (1)01.) AR f;PJ •.oR T -A1f I'• , a ^ r� ` . , '`' L. : : •Y' , j, `� r,1 ItRT••• Io>t' ,� ,` 4'1SAI•xt• 1P1014/1 AMI'') --:-' tc-..., t, ;.....: , i,T. I. •� . . ; : _i, . ' *. f 0,1:4 /R5 ^c,1 ! A•r' T QTY R RH (III TR) a. 1 ' .1-•'4.1, . '• ..r' Y'•. •_ _ r *1'-' ', 1 �,' •, �'r. ,'11.41/01.'.RT • 4. (CQUNTR/MI.1 = .' A ,_,y� .k1 , 1( Mil , TIINHOR ' AETT .RA1.i1S(MI./I ) s . , N• .4..�►•� .o .' • w, •� ^• �....w � ..•.••.mats •u•.....w'►►.r awe,A�'tiNI.i�u..•• �I•JN rI/..Yn��.w I IM f,4 ]I!' INxM•}'M1tIItlieiT3W1-$d1V44l.Yr..'4 '!1 .14L. i i -• X -7:7, � �� Coy .. . A i .,J . \, \i, �1_ I MOLZMACHER_McLENNN and MURRELL P.C. • CONSULTING ENGINEERS. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS and PLANNERS 125 BAYLIS ROAD, SUITE 140, MELVILLE N.Y. 11747 • 516.752.9060 i - _ .. • 111 January 24 , 1986 1 r1 ;1 �I ItiLLJAN 2319E// ' ' !i VVI/_. -�. ..-' Tc OLS 6F S �.� Supervisor Francis J. Murpr 11 hy Town of Southold 53095 Main Road 11 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Southold Scavenger Waste Lagoons 11 SORT 83-02 • Dear Supervisor Murphy: . 1 I am enclosing a copy of the volatile halogenated/volatile non- halogenated _organic and phenol analyses 'performed on the sample obtained from the scavenger waste lagoon on December 30 , 1985 . 11 This data should be filed with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Please note that the sludge samples are still undergoing analysis , and data should be Iavailable early next week. Please contact me if you require any further information. I/ Very truly yours, I • HOLZMACHER, McLENDON & MURRELL, P.C. II 7 ---' .:=-.--,r--:-;//' IIGary-E. Loesch, P.E. . u s. flit rLS�__ IN ii GEL:mad D ISI EnclosuresRd • FEB X96 I� l .II cc: Supt. Raymond L. Jacobs \\ P Ym I I 1 I I v3 , . r I NOLZMACNER, MCLENOON an MURRELL. P.0 • CONSULTING ENGINEERS. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS ano PLANNERS 575 BROAD HOLLOW ROAD. MELVILLE. N.Y. 11747• 516-494-3040 Harry Goldsran Water Analysis Samole Lab No. 565449 I Main Rd. .. - Date Collected: 12/30/85 - Mattit::ck, NY 11922 Date Received: 12/30/85 Type: Misc. - Town of Southold - Clitchorue Sca II Point: Scavenger Waste Lagoon Waste Site Collected By: CL 99 SPDES Permit =NY0103446 II ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR VOLATILE HALOC=vATM ORGANICS CarDcund ua/1 vinyl cnloride < 1 dichloredifluoranethane < 1 11 methylene chloride < 2 trichS orofluoraTett�ane < 1 1 , 1-dichloroethylene < 1 11 1 , 1-dic`.ioroethar.e < 1 �ar s-1 ,2�ichloroe xylene < 1 cis-1 ,2-d:c^lcrcehy1ene < 1 chlorof or- < 1 II 1 , 1 ,2-trichlorot=_f_::oroetha_^.e < 1 t ,2-dic:loroet'-.a.-1_ < .1 , 1 , 1 , 1-trich--oroet-`.. a < 2 II carbon tetrachlcride < 1 bramodic`:1 c rORie t ane < 1 1 ,2-di_hloroprcne <. 1 II 2,3-dichlorcp_opene < 1 trans-1 , 3-dichlorapro �e < 1 tric:ilcroe_zyleze < 1 1 , 1 ,2-tr ichloroe:hare < 1 II chlorodibrararethane < 1 cis-1 ,3-dichloroprepene' < 1 bra^r f c:::: < 1 II 1 , 1 , 1 ,2-tetrachloroe_'Zane < 1 tetrachloroethylene < 1 1, 1 ,2,2-tetrachloroethane < 1 chlorobenzene < 1 VOLATILE NON-HALOGENATED ORGANICS • benzene < 1 toluene 26 II ethylbenzene < 1 p--.Ell ene < 1 . c-xylene < 1 Im-xyl=ne < 1 :.3te ..-.7, :sd: 1/1 ' '86 1 .rr . . I5 S.C. '::: r-to:: P.E. Lab :ice:c'-__ , 11 ... . ... . . . .... ... . ._ . _. ._ . _ - PAW:hGl_ 1 OF t, Environmental Engineers & Scientists HOLZMACHER. MCLENDON and MURRI.LL. P C LABORATORY 575 OROAO HOLLOW ROAD,MELVILLE.NEW YORK 11 747 (516) 694-3040 REPORT I a NL SOURCES•WATER SUPPLY &TREATMENT •SEwERAGE & TREATMENT • ECOLOGICAL & IMPACT STUDIES i- LAB NO• 56:4450 %A •..ul L STUDIES•PILOT PLANT STUDIES•WATER/WASTE TEA LAaOI ATORY AND ANALYTICAL SERVICES PROJECT 1>tfi 7 • CI ILII T'S N'I.IC AND ADDRESS ' TYPE OF SANPLE - i'IISCELLAUF'OUS COLLECTED BY CL 9:' DATE COLLECTED - 12/30/95 DATE RECEIVED - 12/30/85 HARRY GOLDMIAN WATER ANALYSIS CUTCHOGUE SCAVEN(+ER WASTE SITE 14AUl RD SIDES PERMIT s N. Y . 011)3446 SCAVENGER WASTE LAGOON hATTITUCK, NY 11922 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TLt . __ _RESULT IlIE.1Ol.E 30 .0 1 • REMARKS - COPY TO GEL it. RESULTS IN Men)L) EXCEPT AS NOTED BY I (UO/L ) OR X (PERCENT ) ADD T . COLI BAC T. 2 Ff.CAL COLI (NFPI/100HL) ['ATE REPORTED I / 9/86 COLOR, ODOR, TURBIIIIT'i 2 PH (UNITS ) I 1 1 I I I REFERENCE NO. 14 . I 111 I I I I 1 1 1 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Solid & Hazardous Waste Building 40 , : UNY Stony Brook , NY 11794 111111.17 ( 516 ) 751-7900 Henry G. Williams Commissioner April 29 , 1987 I The Honorable Francis 0 . Murphy Supervisor - Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold , NY 11971 I/ Re : Scavenger Waste Lagoons Dear Supervisor Murphy : With regard to the water in the Southold scavenger lagoons , the most recent data does not show the presence of any 1 ,1 ,1- trichloroethane , the only listed hazardous waste that was alleged to have been disposed of in the landfill in the Suffolk County Health Department ' s March 8 , 1979 memorandum . The water may be mixed with the shredded material adjacent to the lagoons . It is my understanding that the area where the shredded material is located is underlain by clay . In order to remove the potentially contaminated scavenger sludge from close proximity to groundwater , permission is granted to relocate the sludge and temporarily store it in the impermeable clay area . The material 11 should be sampled as quickly as possible to determine the levels of contamination in the sludge . If you need any additional information , please advise . Sincerely , I Robert A . Becherer , P .E . Regional Hazardous Waste Engineer RAB : cp cc : P . Roth G. Brezner G. Loesch , H2M 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � REFERENCE NO. 15 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I jG8.--2 - ��-� – • FIELD 'JO. LAB NO. - �OJ . 8Y A D, , C" ITYPE SAMPLE �-\ ( NAME. NOT INITIALS DATE COL. / �_ 3 L_ /GCS/"7 DATE REC"JD. - TIME REC''JD. 00 TIME COL. v DATE COMPLETED /"'\-),)\ Z' "J SUFFOLK COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES LABORATORY ICHEMICAL EXAMINATION OF WATER, SEWAGE,INDUSTRIAL WASTE NAME OR FIRM Groundwater/[ Resources /I ADDRESS OR LOCATION ` o v3-2 Sd u-f'c a �J �-A-Ndr`c-C POINT OF COLLECTION Observation well `= IREMARKS/INSTRUCTIONS I mma. m 1 TEST RESULT TEST RESULT liter l TEST RESULT lit I FO ICONDUCT umho X NITRATE•N I COPPER pH X NITRITE - CO 9 I X 1IRON r 1 < •TESTRESULT m-9 �Y liter X AMMONIAN ' ss X MANGANESE r 3c) Iph.ALKALINITY 1TKN I 1CHROMIUM IIT. ALKALINITY .X I0•PO4 P t 1 (NICKEL 1 I I ;{ (CHLORIDE q_ 1 JZINC t 1FLUORIDE I 1 X (MAGNESIUM ) SIV,- , I `CYANIDE TOT. SOLIDS X CALCIUM i Sf: SUS. SOLIDS LEAD ol r XJSULFATE •_ I • g.. X 1 0 01SS. SOLIDS CADMIUM IMBAS SILVER C.O.O. X SODIUM 3o' 17. / O.C. `�' Q X Field D.O. u. / X POTASSIUM Gr X Field temp 7e) BARIUM 'i �' " s v X , Field tH X Field Gond rico X FiP1_cl 71 k et r I1 X J n T Y _ Niii Lab :.o . 'O- , - 77-7 :1-- Rec ' d at Lab 134'f% :'_ eid No . 766k7 Public Water ' 11 Date 'E-ic)-//t7 Private Water Time /4°1-) Other Col . 3y No Aefrc Date Completed '�- . ;'i II Examined By SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION OF MEDICAL LEGAL INVESTIGATIONS & FORENSIC SCIENCES IIPUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY TRACE ORGANIC ANALYSIS OF WATER II / Name 76Cr? Owner or District IILocationov7 uCc/ C�li-c�f « Point of Collection / e.1 / Lu -e CC IR e m a r K a : S,c{,,f-( C .+GO o r`7`c.s IICompound ppb Compound ppb_ 11 306 vinyl chloride 4k 250 benzene ct 305 methylene chloride . , { 251 toluene I_ 290 bromochloromethane . . . . 258 chlorobenzene II 323 1 , 1 dichloroethane . . . . Lk 259 ethylbenzene 309 trans dichloroethylene . � t 254 o-xylene `. ...L_ 300 chloroform 41 252 m-xylene 41 II 324 1 , 2 dichloroethane . . . . .. { 253 p-xylene �_ 321 1 , 1 , 1 trichloroethane . < 1 255 total xylenes 304 carbon tetrachloride . . . , I 257 bromobenzene - II294 1 bromo 2 chloroethane , 1 266 o-chlorotoluene - 1 405 1 , 2 dichloropropane . . . ,(2, 267 m-chlorotoluene _ II 310 1 , 1 , 2 _ ichloroethylene L. ! 268 p-chlorotoluene � 1 303 chlorodibromomethane 1 265 total chlorotoluene 293 1 , 2 dibromoethane t 419 1 , 3 , 5 trimethylbenzene • < < I/ 420 2 bromo 1 chloropropane , { 418 1, 2 , 4 trimethylbenzene . c 301 bromoform Lk 415 m,p-dichlorobenzene . . . . z 311 tetrachloroethylene 4 412 o-dichlorobenzene ../.._a--- _IIII 308 cis dichroethylene . . < k 432 p-diethylbenzene1 320 freo.n:;.l1 .4 I 435 1, 2, 4 , 5 tetramethylbenz ' 292 dib ..�gmethane < I 437 1 , 2 , 4 trichlorobenzene . - II307 1 , 1 di _ h`l38roethylene < V 438 1, 2, 3 trichlorobenzene . 302 bromodi • oromethane . . , 1 409 1 , 1 , 1 , 2 tetrachl 'oethane c I 406 2, 3 dichloropropene . . • � � 430 1, 2, 2, 3 tetrachl' propane - II407 cis d '(iLp;.�oropropene . • . .. 295 s-tetrachloroethane . . . . - lu' 408 trans_ dichloropropene . w1 431 1, 1 , 1 , 2 tetrachl'propane 322 1 , 1 , 2 trichloroethane . . ti 433 1 , 2, 3 trichloropropaae . S II IIE4284..F �r-\CUnr, TOR f I ELDNO. %Z / LAB NO. e1 :�?' 9Y N°/; /- TYPE SAMPLE2 _,� i— Ill I l NAME. NOT INITIALS ./ /G� 7 DATE REC'VD. GATE COL. / / TIME REC'VD. I 1 TIME COL. //}2- - DATE COMPLETED �`'�1fP Il././1 iSUFFOLK COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES LABORATORY CHEMICAL EXAMINATION OF WATER, SEWAGE, INDUSTRIAL WASTE 111 TAME OR FIRM Groundwater Resou`rc�efs�, J Q \DDRESS OR LOCATION 6q "26 f �J d dill oC� `-, r r' 6 IPOINT OF COLLECTION Observation well 1 ivvv-kRiri.;iiNsTRUi..TiONS m J TEST RESULT TEST RESULT liter{J ma ( 1 TEST RESULT lite II CONDUCT 1 umho X NITRATE-N 53 I COPPER pH X NITRITE . O,Z(r, X 'IRON 1r`% TEST RESULT m--9 O J Q r liter X AMMONIA-N X MANGANESE r �- Iph.ALKALINITY TKN 'CHROMIUM T. ALKALINITY q X 0 PO P NICKEL 111 X CHLORIDE 3 i 7 ZINC �J 1111 FLUORIDE X MAGNESIUM cd t� CYANIDE TOT. SOLIDS _X CALCIUM )l./2( IISUS. SOLIDS LEAD IX SULFATE (0. 9 OISS.SOLIDS CADMIUM IMBAS SILVER 11. C.O.D. 3:6".'X SODIUM T.O.C. -,''.- • X Field D.O. N1A X POTASSIUM Jr/1 _, • _. X Field temp / 2.0 BARIUM - �� '• or - X Field pH 5"' 7 X . Field Conti ‘ 0 1 3C___ ;1 (31 (1 alka , J L�.73 . + x 3 . 8 8204 I 38.11 II .ab No . TO- . / 3 Recd at Lab /,� /in Field No . 5761 Public water Fate 4-)- /g$7 Private Water Time 1IOther IICol . By ,yp4Cf Date Completed '-1-3-a7 • Examined By JL:-1. I SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION OF MEDICAL LEGAL INVESTIGATIONS & FORENSIC SCIENCES PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY IITRACE ORGANIC ANALYSIS OF WATER IIName S9 ,6 / Owner or District Location -CO ‘111766 ci Z4 4 r! IIPoint of Collection -re3 71,u-e. ( c IIRemarks : ,St .1- .L. i G 17�(.ef IICompound ppb Compound ppb_ 306 vinyl chloride 250 benzene II 305 methylene chloride . . . . cl 251 toluene 3 290 bromochloromethane 258 chlorobenzene _ 323 1 , 1 dichloroethane . . . . _ 259 ethylbenzene _•_L_ 309 trans dichloroethylene . -. 1 254 o-xylene — II 300 chloroform ,`1 252 m-xylene — 324 1 , 2 dichloroethane ,. 1 253 p-xylene — ' 321 1 , 1 , 1 trichloroethane . 4, k 255 total xylenes �_ 304 carbon tetrachloride . . . ck 257 bromobenzene 294 1 bromo 2 chloroethane , k 266 o-chlorotoluene 1__ II405 1 , 2 dichloropropane . . . t \ 267 m-chlorotoluene 0 310 1 , 1 , 2 trichloroethylene c1 268 p-chlorotoluene < I 303 chlorodibromomethane . . 4 \ 265 total chlorotoluene — II293 1 , 2 dibromoethane .. k 419 1 , 3 , 5 trimethylbenzene . � 1 420 2 bromo 1 chloropropane 4 \ 418 1, 2, 4 trimethylbenzene . 3 11 301 .bromoform < < 415 m, p-dichlorobenzene . . . . < ,:1 31L- tetrachloroethylene < i 412 o-dichlorobenzene till__ 308 cis dichloroethylene < < 432 p-diethylbenzene .--c---- II --c-_II 3.20 freon 113 < 435 1, 2, 4, 5 tetramethylbenz '292 dibromomethane 437 1 , 2, 4 trichlorobenzene . 4. 14. II 307 1 , 1 dichloroethylene . . 438 1, 2, 3 trichlorobenzene • a . 3.02. bromodichloromethane . . < 409 1 , 1 , 1 , 2 tetrachl'oethane 41 401'-2,0 dichloropropene . . . < 1 430 1, 2, 2, 3 tetrachl' propane 407 cis . chloropropene . . . 4 295 s-tetrachloroethane . . . . — II 408 trans dichloropropene . c1 431 1, 1, 1, 2 tetrachl'propaae -- 322 1 , 1 , 2 trichloroethane . 4. 1 433 1,2 , 3 trichloropropane . Al , II 11 18-1284..8/1 , _ I bl . ° Y ; _� iELD s.0LAB NO '-- — i ,-- I CCI' BY A/C/e9(- ' ' TYPE SAMPLE (-2").6)(--C-- NAME. NOT INITIALS DATE COL. / 7 3-3a-�%/ DATE REC"VD. - /^fi l TIME REC'VD. CO I TIME COL. I_ �` ` DATE COMPLETED �rt�\( �� •* l\ �� '�. SUFFOLK COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES LABORATORY "camIl -'41 CHEMICAL EXAMINATION OF WATER, SEWAGE, INDUSTRIAL WASTE NAME OR FIRM _ Groundwater Resources 0.) 257 C. ADDRESS OR LOCATION 6890 Sa crat6.1 LA-A.41 L Li POINT OF COLLECTION Observation well I REMARKS/INSTRUCTIONSI _..�. r TEST RESULT TEST RESULT a. liter ! TEST RESULT Imc I (CONDUCT 1 umbo X NITRATE•N I S • COPPER pH X NITRITE . C I g X hRON r l TESTRESULT Inver X AMMONIA-N I . 0 k 1 GT X (MANGANESE �' r 1-1 7 ph.ALKALINITY , TKN CHROMIUM _ I T. ALKALINITY X '0•PO4•P NICKEL I Ix1CHLORIDE .� 4� X i r. ZINC FLUORIDE [ 1 X MAGNESIUM l'ib, ICYANIDE 1 I TOT. SOLIDS r X CALCIUM ' ,5 x la'i— SUS. SOLIDS LEAD X ,SULFATE 1 •3 X I Ca DISS. SOLIDS CADMIUM I MBAS SILVER I 4 C. X SODIUM i fg A 1 IT.O.C. .4° A7 X Field D .O. si 6 _ X POTASSIUM , */ ,t i r,/ lip /''.•. X Field temp 0, 0 BARIUM I i r • . X Field DH be6 . X Field Cond . 268CO rieid i1ka _ IL X n_T__IY c-f6_ •62.1 ' '7 -iO � C . - ,- % - 7 a : -. ,,‘/-". Field No . :Elie Public Water :ate 20- /4IS47 Private water Time /,? Other IICol . By IPACA. Date Completed L--: •v7 Examined By - -• 11 SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION OF MEDICAL LEGAL INVESTIGATIONS & FORENSIC SCIENCES PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY 1 TRACE ORGANIC ANALYSIS OF WATER IIName 68916 Owner or District ILocation St)vrt4oLf L.,q—,_c, r; .( Point of Collection -r-c:mu.. C c • IIRemarkb : 6714-a. /.9atf-Gef ICompound ppb Compound ppb_ 306 vinyl chloride _ H 250 benzene ' II 305 methylene chloride . . . . 4I 251 toluene 290 bromochloromethane . . . . 258 chlorobenzene < . 323 1 , 1 dichloroethane . . . . , k 259 ethylbenzene 4 i 11 309 trans dichloroethylene . , i. 254 o-xylene • i 300 chloroform < I 252 m-xylene i 324 1 , 2 dichloroethane . . . . ,� 253 p-xylene i II 321 1 , 1 , 1 trichloroethane . . 255 total xylenes 304 carbon tetrachloride . . . . i 257 bromobenzene 294 1 bromo 2 chloroethane 266 o-chlorotoluene i 405 1 , 2 dichloropropane . . . ?, 267 m-chlorotoluene 310 1 , 1 , 2 trichloroethylene . 1 268 p-chlorotoluene ' i II 303 chlorodibromomethane . . i 265 total chlorotoluene . . . . 293 1 , 2 dibromoethane 419 1 , 3 , 5 trimethylbenzene . - 1 420 2 bromo 1 chloropropane i 418 1, 2, 4 trimethylbenzene . .. k II301 bromoform ik 415 m,p-dichlorobenzene . . . . i � 311 tetrachloroethylene 412 o-dichlorobenzene 1 r 308 cis dichloroethylene . . _ k 432 p-diethylbenzene < i II320 freon 113 . c 435 1, 2, 4 , 5 tetramethylbenz' 4- t292 dibromomethane , ( 437 1 , 2, 4 trichlorobenzene . I 307 1 ,'1 _dichloroethylene • + 438 1, 2, 3 trichlorobenzene if:302 bromodichloromethane 409 1 , 1 , 1 , 2 tetrachl 'oethane 406 2, 3 dichloropropene . I 430 1, 2, 2, 3 tetrachl' propane 407 cis dichloropropene . . . . i 295 s-tetrachloroethane . . • . - III + 408 trans dichloropropene . . i 431 1, 1, 1 , 2 tetrachl'propane — ' 322 1 , 1 , 2 trichloroethane . • y 433 1 ,2, 3 trichloropropane . 4I , II Ir"iEL� LABORATORY I =:EL_D NO. C d JI LAB NO. 'J � 1 ICO' BY A/0/ !L/ I TYPE SAMPLE 14---)(-- LC- 1 NAME. NOT INITIALS DATE COL. 3- C).-/9 /7� U DATE REC'VD. -- 404/ /"'�) I 404 i TIME RECVD. of lv °° I TIME COL. f DATE COMPLETED \ r, „4.... �' �' g-,- . SUFFOLK COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES LABORATORY ICHEMICAL EXAMINATION OF WATER, SEWAGE, INDUSTRIAL WASTE NAME OR FIRM Groundwater Resources e-95'7-We Ct IADDRESS OR LOCATION 1‘CJO 31 (L-1-46(.4 L .i'.sc' r-L(" POINT OF COLLECTION Observation well ', ,, 4 1 cit., IaPmoRKS/INSTRUCTIONS I TEST RESULT TEST RESULT rilLI liter f TEST RESULT ICONDUCT umho X NITRATE•N # 3(c I COPPER pH X NITRITE , 0 IC I X IRON Lr6 I 1mg TEST RESULT liter X AMMONIA•N L• 0 1 X MANGANESE 2t 0 Iph.ALKALINITY TKN CHROMIUM I IT. ALKALINITY X 0-PO4•P NICKEL Ix CHLORIDE 1 4 , ZINC FLUORIDE X MAGNESIUM ir ?--- ICYANIDE TOT. SOLIDS X CALCIUM ga SUS.SOLIDS LEAD X SULFATE /f 0. DISS.SOLIDS CADMIUM MBAS SILVER C.O.D . X SODIUM /f I _ (�J Q . T.O.C. `� /'i X Field D.O. ?,8 x POTASSIUM .63'5 .>% X Field temp BARIUM r r k X Field pH , 220 Cond.Xti Y ,_ riP1d i1�., q ?S2 II /f ab N . '''S' 77_,:: ;,-._ �ec ' � at Lab Field No . 6'&5_? / Public Water Date 3-Y-/4S7 Private Water 11 Time W141Other Col . By °AfrIC Date Completed 4-Q-`6'1 Examined By IISUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION OF MEDICAL LEGAL. INVESTIGATIONS & FORENSIC SCIENCES PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY IITRACE ORGANIC ANALYSIS OF WATER IIName 69831 Owner or District IILocation SoJ ? 4J(c.( Lvf1.,C.I t( Point of Collection 7e5 TLL'e.cC • Remarks : S'fr..4-(.L 13 e iY L c ICompound ppb Compound ppb_ 306 vinyl chloride tk 250 benzene • _f_i_.___ I 305 methylene chloride . t 251 toluene c � 290 bromochloromethane 258 chlorobenzene _ .1_I323 1 , 1 dichloroethane . . . . . k 259 ethylbenzene L.1.--- I 309 trans dichloroethylene . = t 254 o-xylene f--L-- 300 1300 chloroform ck 252 m-xylene ,. 324 1, 2 dichloroethane . . . . . \ 253 p-xylene11 i ,4. 321 1 , 1 , 1 trichloroethane . .4 255 total xylenes 304 carbon tetrachloride . . . Lt 257 bromobenzene - II294 1 bromo 2 chloroethane t 266 o-chlorotoluene t 405 1 , 2 dichloropropane . . . i1 267 m-chlorotoluene it 310 1 ;1 , 2 trichloroethylene . k 268 p-chlorotoluene L-!--- 11 303 chlorodibromomethane . . _ 265 total chlorotoluene . . . • - 293 1 , 2 dibromoethane 1 419 1 , 3 , 5 trimethylbenzene . , ` 420 2 bromo 1 chloropropane 418 1, 2 , 4 trimethylbenzene • < k II301 bromoform .' l 415 m, p-dichlorobenzene . . • • < � 311 tetrachloroethylene _ 1 412 o-dichlorobenzene II 308 cis dichloroethylene . . _ l 432 p-diethylbenzene . 1 320 freon 113 k 435 1, 2, 4 , 5 tetramethylbenz' t 292 dibromomethane - 1 437 1 , 2, 4 trichlorobenzene . - I `_3� nodichloroethylene c � 438 1, 2, 3 trichlorobenzene . � � 302<'/_ o loromethane 4 1 409 1 , 1 , 1 , 2 tetrachl 'oethane = k 406 -2-0!„ 1 propene . \ 430 1, 2, 2, 3 tetrachl' propane — 407 cis dIc . p propene .0 295 s-tetrachloroethane — II . ... 408 tranA dicli oropropene 4t 431 1, 1 , 1 , 2 tetrachl'propane — 322 1 , 1 , 2 trichloroethane . 433 1 , 2 , 3 trichloropropane . 77 1 � REFERENCE NO. 16 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .. .... .. .. ... I 1 1 WORKPLAN TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Part 360 and Phase II ' Hydrogeologic Investigation Work Plan. Southold Landfill II - Town of Southold Suffolk County, NY 1 1 1 I . 11 1 - 1 11 :ommenss re: 2nvi__.^ental _rcoosea landfill =:ceansion (NYSDEC Division of Solid 'Haste, Region 1 office) The Workplan contains no strategy for assessing the monitorability of a proposed expansion reported to be located downgradient of the existing unlined landfill facility. Simply siting wells in an upgradient and downgradient sense of the proposed expansion area does not ensure development of a viable landfill monitoring plan. ' Landfill expansions adjacent to existing landfills which are already contaminating groundwater may be allowed by the department if the proposed expansion area can be constructed in a way that demonstrates compliance with the regulations. This may be demonstrated using remedial actions at the existing site resulting in a demonstrated improvement in groundwater quality; acceptable levels of leachate in the secondary (detection monitoring) leachate collection and removal system of the expansion; and any additional monitoring requirements that the department needs to ensure the integrity of the expansion area, which may include lysimeter studies beneath the new liner, statistical triggers of groundwater monitoring, . tracers, additional monitoring wells surrounding the entire site, and any other monitoring methods required by the Department. ' An adequate evaluation of anticipated monitoring problems and practical alternatives is not presented in the workplan. A synergistic monitoring plan for the proposed expansion is almost certain to be required ' in consideration of the probable expansion site. Research efforts to support alternate monitoring strategies must be developed and approved prior to final workplan approval. II. Comments re: Phase II Investigation (NYSDEC Bureau of Hazardous Site Control) 1. Since this investigation work should satisfy the requirements of Part 360 Hydrogeologic Investigation as well as Phase II Investigation at Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites; wherever applicable the more stringent of the two requirements should be I followed. 2. In Page 1-1, 1, line 7 of the Work Plan should read Division of Solid• Waste instead of Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste Regulations. _ _ 3. A Phase I investigation report has been prepared for this site by Woodward-Clyde consultants in December, 1985, and should be referenced accordingly in Section 2.2 - Site History and Previous Investigations. II :SDEC correspondence ith the own c: Sout-c=.. _ncicat=_s that I -. the Town accepted 55 gallon drums (filled with iicuid =rcn the .Matt tuck Airbase) , as well as industrial waste, leach=ng lagoons at the landfill site. :his should be given appropriate I consideration in investigative procedures relative to the former lagoon sites. IS. Geophysical study and soil gas survey should be conducted in ^ order to detect the plume or hazardous waste disposal area if present. Further, this information will aid to justify or to revise the proposed monitoring well locations. ' 6. The geophysical and soil gas survey data should be reviewed to determine the need for on site soil borings. 1 7. If a hazardous waste disposal area on site is identified as a result of the geophysical and/or soil gas survey conducted on II site, then soil samples should be acquired and analyzed for the Target Compound List and EP Toxicity. 8. The workplan must include the collection and analysis of II . background soil samples and the designation of -these sample locations in undisturbed areas outside of landfilled segments and V related landfill activities. I • 9. Additional shallow wells are needed to adequately cover the eastern boundary of the existing landfill area. (See also additional well locations specified under landfill closure IIcomments. ) 10. Section 4. 10 Groundwater Sampling - Well purging should remove 4 I -- to 10 wellbore volumes of water, prior to sampling. During purging, pH, specific conductance temperature and turbidity must be monitored and shown to stabilize. These parameters need not II be stabilized during well development, with the exception of turbidity, which must not exceed 50 NTU. II _ _ 11. Analytical methods for purposes of the Phase II investigation, should be modified as follows: 624 (volatiles) changed to 8240 I 625 (semivolatiles) changed to 8270 608 (pesticides/PCB's) changed to 8080 II Workplan methodologies for leachate indicators and metals are acceptable as proposed. (Analytical methods for volatiles and _ semi-volatiles for the post-closure landfill monitoring plan should be addressed per comment 12, Landfill Closure I Investigation comments.) . 12. Data validation should be performed by a lab other than the one II _ performing the analysis, and the workplan should designate that validator. I ..:.r..rents ___: Landfill Closure =t esz' aat_tn Pursuant t, Part (NYSDEC Sureau of Facility anagement) 1 . On page 3-44, the consultant seems to have combined the terms ' contamination and impact. All landfills in New York's climate produce contaminated leachate. As this leachate migrates into any ground or surface water resource it causes some level of ' * contamination. This contamination may not, however have a significant impact. The study may be able to demonstrate a lack of significant impact upon specific resources but it is doubtful that it can be proven the landfill is not generating contaminated leachate or that this leachate is being completely contained in the fill mass. Perhaps a more correct statement to make would be that no evidence of significant groundwater contamination .from the landfill has been detected to date. If a goal of this study is to prove that there has been no contamination migration from the facility, it must be demonstrated why this is so, as discussed previously, or provide many more wells than proposed to investigate every possible place where leachate may have -- --- migrated. The second half of the statement (that the facility does not significantly impact water supply) may also need to be modified. • A more precise way to describe this would be to say that there is ' no evidence to date which shows that any existing water supply wells are currently being impacted. Finally, this statement provides an incorrect purpose for the ' planned investigation. The purpose of a closure investigation is to find the contaminant routes to determine it's source and the environmental impacts it is having or may potentially have in the ' future. All of this is directed towards determining what measures must be taken to close the facility in a manner that will correct the problems and prevent significant environmental II _ impacts. Then, once closure has been completed, closure _ monitoring can be used to demonstrate that the situation is becoming better as a result of the actions taken. 2. The placement of the well screens in the cluster wells cannot be automatically relegated to one screen at the top of the aquifer and one at its base. The proper position of the screens must be ' based upon the most likely location of the contaminant plume. The recommended method for determining this location (vertically) is to drill to the base of the formation, and case the hole for monitoring at the bottom. Then a down hole electro magnetics (EM) probe can be used to measure the electrical conductivity of the formation surrounding the well to compare with stratigraphy. In areas where conductivity rises without a concurrent increase in clay and silt content of the formation, it is likely that contaminated groundwater is the cause. Then the best potential location of shallow screens can be determined. 11 1 The report does contain two sentences, founts on =age -�-- , that suggest that the proposed screen depths are not cast in c^.ncrete. Unfortunately, however, this shorn statement is easily missed. It is very possible that the field supervisor will also miss it. Additionally, the use of organic vapors alone as described has 1 two problems. First, landfill leachates are often low in volatile organics. Second, the method as proposed appears to suggest that drilling will stop when a contaminated zone has been reached. Doing so, however, could miss deeper zones of even greater contamination. ' It is recommended that both the organic vapor method and the geophysical techniques described above be used. Additionally, it is recommended that the number of wells in each cluster be adjusted to monitor all areas of contamination found (more than two wells may be needed in each cluster). In doing so, the length of each screen should not exceed the regulatory limit of 20 feet so that dilution of a concentrated plume will be minimized. If the number of wells becomes excessive, it may be possible to initially analyze each well for field parameters only to determine which are most appropriate for a full suite of water 1 quality analyses. This.decision will, however, have to_be made after drilling and installation of the wells has been completed.. The incorporation of all the additional well locations suggested in this workplan review would result in many wells being required. Based upon what is found during drilling, it may be possible to forgo screening of the water table or the base of 1 the formation in some of the wells. However, water table elevations must be known in enough points to assure a complete understanding of groundwater flow patterns throughout the site. Similarly, drilling to the base of the formation must be 1 sufficient to demonstrate the continuity of the clay layer under the entire site and that the possible area of deep contaminant migration has been monitored. Conversely, if the clay layer 1 cannot be shown to be continuous, it may mean that deeper aquifers will need to be investigated. The current report does not contain stratigraphic information or 1 logs of the existing, on-site wells. Because of this information lack, specific recommendations cannot be made regarding how many additional water table wells or base of formation wells must be added to the current array to provide an understanding of the site geology or water flow patterns. ) I . Accordingly, regional staff will work closely_ with. the applicant as this information is developed, to determine what areas do need to be screened and monitored and what areas can be omitted. In order to facilitate this working relationship it is suggested 1 that prior to drilling, the applicant gather all available information and place it onto a series of preliminary site cross sections. These cross sections must include site specific 1 geologic and hydrogeologic information. The site specific cross sections should be tied into the regional cross sections. (This - I should include an evaluation of which, of t e exist:.^.g wells , if any, will be userul for evaluating water table and potentiometric head information. ) As additional _nIormation is gathered in drilling, these can be updated, and reviewed with regional staff. In this manner, it will be- possible to -have a good handle on what . information is known and what information still needs to be obtained to understand the site. Table 3-2 lists 33 monitoring I wells in the vicinity of the site. The report must tabulate all known water table data for these wells, the date they were measured, and the source of this data. A ground water map must 11 • be constructed from this data. Finally, all relevant information, including boring logs, geophysical results, water table elevations and field monitoring results should be provided with the final site investigation report to allow a complete II review. 3. None of the proposed monitoring wells are in close proximity to II the existing landfill area. It is recommended that an additional cluster be constructed, east of the existing landfill area, and roughly 500 feet southeast of the proposed cluster MW-3. II 4. Based upon the three water elevations provided_on Figure 3-9, the "inferred direction of ground water flow appears to be roughly- 5 - 6 degrees too far to the west. I . 5. The measures by which the scavenger waste lagoons were closed I were not fully described. If it cannot be shown why there is no chance that these lagoons are still the source of contamination (either from wastes remaining in the lagoons or from residual contaminated soil created from the migration of waste products - II down to the water table) additional monitoring wells will be . • needed to monitor this impact. To accomplish this a monitoring well cluster will be needed in the downgradient direction as I close to these lagoons as possible. It is suggested that this cluster be used to replace the existing well cluster that the consultant has proposed to use that are located approximately 500 I __ _ _ feet north of this area. _.__ . _ It also may be appropriate to have an additional cluster upgradient of these lagoons. The first reason is that wells in II this area will be useful in pinning down the location of the groundwater divide between the landfill and the special . groundwater protection zone that lies close to the facility, towards the southwest. This well, if clean, would positively 1/- . _ show the.presence of groundwater that has not been contaminated by the landfill in this divide area. This piece of data would be II a strong argument for the applicant in demonstrating that the landfill is not impacting this groundwater resource. 1 _ 1 • I II Tde second reason for :dis well depends uton the nature o= the wastes placed in them. dense non-aqueous phase l-quds (DNAPL's) have been disposed in these lagoons, they could migrate in the up-gradient direction along the top of the clay laver, which reportedly dips tewards_the south in this area. . This issue should be discussed with those involved with the Phase II investigation. 6. No wells are situated in a location that would monitor the waste oil storage area. Department photodocumentation of spillage from + 55 gallon drums used for temporary storage indicates an II additional monitoring well cluster may be needed in this area. However, the additional well cluster proposed in !#3 above, may provide adequate coverage; depending upon groundwater flow IIdirections that ultimately are identified from this study. Similarly, no wells are located close to the old automobile I storage area. The possibility of contamination in this area should be carefully evaluated by the region. Should contamination be likely here too, an additional well should be II placed in this area. Here, too, however, the proposed monitoring well for the scavenger_waste lagoons may be._ableto pick up contamination emanating from this area. I For both of these areas it may be best to link the decision of whether or not to monitor this area with the applicant's intentions for closure of the area. If they are proposing to leave the area uncapped, so that leaching through the waste will continue unabated, the well must be required to insure that this area is having no discernible impact. If the area is to be included in the proposed cap, it is not as crucial that the II contamination emanating from this area be distinguished from that of the rest of the facility. In the latter case, the alternative monitor wells suggested above may suffice. 11 i. The precise location of the groundwater divide is not firmly proven through the existing wells. Currently the divide is shown II _ _ on Figure 3-2 to be between wells S-71171 and S-71262. Water table data from other wells is not provided in the text so the divide's location cannot be pinned down in the rest of the area. If this divide is significantly further east than where it is I described in this report, it could mean that some contaminant flow from the landfill is moving towards the special groundwater protection area shown on Figure 3-10. I . _ . Once the new wells have been completed, all of the wells in the vicinity of the site should be measured for water table elevation and the presence of the divide to the southwest of the site IIshould be confirmed. In order to make this information useful all of these wells should be measured on the same day, or group of days, and all of the water table elevations should be provided II in the final report for consideration by Department staff. _ II II 3. Once the leachate plume has been Located and its ccmtosit_on determined, efforts should be made to determine what impact, if any, this plume is having or will have on Long island Sound in the II area where it discharges. At that time regional staff will consider the possibility of monitoring the discharge area and remedial measures beyond capping of the facility if a significant impact is detected. 9. Accordingto the text, a methane investigation has not been g completed since 1976. Accordingly, another methane gas survey II • must be conducted at the site during the investigation. Gas monitoring points should be re-sampled in a variety of weather conditions to ensure that methane migration is not occurring I presently and to determine existing gas migration pathways if they exist. This information should also be used to develop a complete methane monitoring program for the site once the landfill has been capped. II10. Section 4.4 states that previous investigations have shown that "the presence of total organic vapors above ambient levels has not been detected." These previous investigations have not been discussed in-the report._ Upon submittal, this data will be reviewed by staff of the Division of Air. 11. On Page 4-3 it is suggested that the shallow wells will be located at a depth of 50 feet below the ground surface. It is ts•' not clear, however, if this will be the top of the screen or its- II center. In any case, water table wells should be screened so that they will intersect the water table during both high water periods and low. In this way they will be able to identify any I floaters and to provide accurate water table elevations. This was addressed later in the report, however, as noted previously. This comment is directed at ensuring that clear direction is I given for water table wells. 12. It is unclear whether the applicant proposes to use redundant analyses for the volatile and semi volatile organic analytes using II methods 624 and 625 as well as methods 601 and 602. In developing Part 360 the purpose for requiring the 601 and 602 methods-was to achieve the lower detection limits than those available using IIother methods. This, is based upon the low levels of these contaminants that generally are found in landfill leachates, often well below method detection limits for 624 & 625. It is suggested that the use of these more sensitive methods be retained. Unless II similar detection levels can be obtained with other methods used. _ The cost is. not great for performing them and they are excellent leachate indicators. Similarly, it is difficult to conclude II whether or not the consultant is proposing to perform the hexavalent chromium analysis. II 13. Any reports or sources used in the compilation of the hydrogeologic investigation for this site must be referenced in the report and listed in the bibliography. II7/25/90 DM:mz I I 1 I I I ' REFERENCE NO. 17 I I r I I i 1 I I l I NUS CORPORATION 1 1 0678 1 1 1 _ _ '.94111111111 i — _____. ___ ________ _____. i —,, _ — -- — - li (c 2'-. 6) ______ __. _.__ _ __:PI j_;E._ :2_-.c___MTj\i)--", r=u ------ I ""PG- _, ai - a.-3 ___?tion_yjN -- _ . __ _ _____ rZIt - - _ ^d__,a_! — =_PSp1Q a - I - - -- -- ----- - -- -- ----- I - - - -- - 111 i f • I /424... 't.'. ;/ ?......... /7r410 ‘691>j,.SASDA "\o—kck4 _ -.4.7111 1 II 1 I3 ::0-77-i 0 L C ,U Y. it/ 5 �D I I - -- A"J r -- ------- ------ ---- ---- - ------- - Pau i _A0 Ez __ s fy �� II, C�.9h ,z..�. ►�A 2u x.. s s c yPo a...7_,,247::. .- _y c24.4, / . I Me_. A eve.__pcA-sc?i,ixe(_ ziq rc1_- 0___. 4N — - - t Vii _ - ti__.4",ca______4?ttex.....__,_RA.a_cc.c6 11 _____c_<;2w_p_.;2____,L.LD- cr `f ;4_5%1. L tiA.)1.4__- - -461 ?4,<G Pcr X69 7 5 __ I �l,;V/ 1•6.4 EG — cji-M I C� oi - 6._77 - iM— ope.____ 9 7(a_ 'i I - /()E rphi - ---------------- - I I _ - - v_L�r L_'cam- rte _ciTY" y-j 4 I /VIP i- /%i v /- gaik,140-t...ti CIC- -.5.,;.1-1- I - — I ?6 . 4" I _ �,,3 t i(% , �. ' ,Ar — / ic • I — 7 / 1 ' ‘ i _______ I i i4-er,s/ 7-i€ c - v,a_l Lc, iI?- ,i -;$ i __ _ G LiAABIAL Q , e '6Cg / UP T i A iL ,iz., p La.V , ha/-7— Nn i‘ __, Cel -7-o s/.4.;2' , ? v1.e. 9 I „„t1 ye P ; el�,../e , id'vs ila r v)' d-f_114. Uel./__ _ I _ 'et: i us rA47-,,QJ, of THS, uxl/S WAS yuo7- iy0, I • Sr 3 I - , ' I 111 I I - - SLL.- ort... 2.:- - `ADD 2 `.- 17/7(LC:, I 1-64.,u).) Ot 0,7--f o la i., C.o n s u !S ; I cD55C,•U K2(.7-f<- I - Tan Cv 9-)Ad e_TT A - 1-1 Ai..,c.I:(i- ;'1'e,2 S 1 Ti... I r, / 162-n Q e u - .04/ A li 1 J- illI i 0 0 1 '' r,, CA i /7 7 _ 71'cieS ill ft-v. :e pic,e_ ,,,‘\ b rs.cassc s --- pi4y ,c'1 i-41.....4&Ds -- ._ — -- - sTccR_S.ic*.C.. ,_ - - -- -- - — — evcN g2a« D _S ; 1 I -- - Af >. A1-ems - IT ___a_kiic.4 4 c k c.44. 1L ,c-497' b --- --- - -_-_--. __-__------•i....- Ai tvia .C.,..._ _. ' % O.. I I :/ia , IIEA c4e--424:21.,4 p 41.4.,,,z1,,__ ___ _ - __ _ - - - __-3 _ I v4--- /iltiiii_____-_5:2714.1 likri - - 17_ I - ---- _SID, s 46,e2vc.,__ba. -f GwQ_-- ti _ fivet - -Nor i • I _o_— - - - F). PI Q ,SjS I ,t.h"J1. -Zt - ---- -L , rJt �Ot/SCOG � s 22 // I _o{r ;i_ c ova�rN i -_ _ -i /e I lac irt 5,zt,________ . ____ . 1 I It." w I l O E 17 -P i . Nero n SE_ - t� a 1 0 _ redtice, 1 o _ /- pc s _ Look .sbu I lit/ l- FS, 5_ _ PtIo r?_ b4u ons w ° - - - --- ----fig-�-�-�E i Hc. !nsT L 5�cvc_N�AciA S-fie`-'e.,1 - — — 4L-so �_�2-5 0 c7�c2.1`_ cw'�h �o�t�OebiL_I ----- 4, k4 - --- - _-_ - - - - —., ,,, .... — , . vir , 1 ✓ s___-,- --, _ ,, ,,_ ! 4,,, _ . 7/9a 1 1 I I 1 I I )4(\ akfejL 0 . ii- ai ,' TPN4S I 1y P4 96 j ,; I 1111A;IefL ---7.- � t A `,t g ys I X--- - 2../..6-7-1,..-- 11/?/, __ 1 --" I I [17. IL , - -.-P 4_ ,"— - iia_ - , (.i_ 4 A % -- I ' N...) - —--- --- -_ - -- -C.9(Z_k-)PJB - � -R .r .,, .1/ 111' _ /I V--- , -- ILA 14-r 'To sCA 4._ 11 ,1 Q . ----- - -- - ---- - — _ a 0Soja g1' I( Er7 7‘1- Imo_ I 'rP N 45 ' lat,IhA 4 � y — ------------- - - - ..n - - vii. ©� p P4 (". ! A1�!fA GG at I --- il7D II _�,,� Pa ///qA0 n .- i 1 Z3jA"'s I <-' — -"', II _o_i ._k.2iL ___ ,- _ .---042F- Ll-5' ' I - I I WeA-Re_ -7-410K., I1-Ne- --..r,-0 a/ye(--- c -711 1 t, -rtia,) re--5 A't-0-. r**-4-1's-e -- Gur N A.ve.- Na tiaAS I 1 -919, A/1-4. A.A07- dlociA-r7-1.44:0 o A-- itioot<se_d_ up r:60 ITN e— i--.64- ?..... "%AA> <IV -c 7 I.'.' 0. i - I ,...--, -rwe..., 5/hi1o,.p... /A,te. ts Y / ,c.,.,(.. I (-D/ ro..s- A.0,-)n - • I 0 A) "VA ,.../t..)Ls 1>e'. er 0.k-), ,,,r...) Ar i TH... likOK 111• C.Alki oar i ..yefl..11.14 n e. ..1 A svy Tii i4V,- , s_ I.4.1 -7/9 m Fik ii/S7 70 ) I ; 3 S t — P5- 5 5 P - Lo -1-04) '<2.1).2 it A 7" AI o i') (1)e--5 7 /7A-) I _ 7714e—T7A01 - - r i i ca A-_._4___P -- 8__ eue4...ar‹.__ c.fia_ ____ eThe..______ I - ---- - ___ _ __ _ _ ...cto. .,,,, _ - _ I I I I - - .00TIP oL 1- � - 1005.7 w. C �c /1/3/1_1 _ _ I - _ fr 'y 1 41_ lJ ZiL1_ CZ_f..,(xri.._ cL- _— - --I • LP J.i-,- ; ii I //. / - ,Plv 5 L -r /— 'Pc 5 ' �1, 7 -F" 'Priv,p' tea. ,, c� - - t IS� T, n� V z V./ 'c ux / 5:ei-At... e F Lf -,-r ire r) .-II I-, 5s ', -I I 0 5 ( 0 #I0 o_ 1-c2 K+ iv E. "7- 111 LA l a"._0 _ _ _ _ _ _ ,_4-4,-fi-er...V. . ___ _,_ ____ _ -- — Ii, ''- 017,; — — -- - _ -_ - _ I TI .____ _ _-7-1::=2-,..--- .,-/_ ',...--;-;e_- --4-- --1-06,---- zr-___.%a4,5' --- I 1 ,l?�t 7 O 1�. i ,=.-- a'-!'0 F— `°-.` 1 I o1- '-o-C.-1 1 . 7' YC w J, INi%' GOC Imo, g4L - 5 u rLnvv.A4-i, 6' ,3 t..,4/2..0 SLA,/s • `__„,, SA. n Iy 2pfy i �� i _ I r 477 * '. i , \ i' - \ L. II Rao *.e..JJ _� ---„ _ _ 1�/ate Con C./24-1Z �" ,•/ I .7 j Pies J�tS dl , ' /C ._G 117 5 p / /' uo 2 k4‘..4 lcau ` , / ixaLsHf'so ( _ ( i I � I - f 1 o� Cans7cu c/i cr•? ,, Pill '4/?° -- ' ovvz. `1 r>dwA-, „Qin_ •✓ i .Ail0A_ 111 o _ IG,s Nce i- .3 V6 L tc C__o p P,-E- il)o -7". zt 1•/ i \\ SL.Ph2A %c/. -- I s---- -- ------- --------- >v�rTa --- - - I \ \ �n7 5 0/) C I —-- A P u /1 es7-,Mg%c S - -- I /::3) Li/1.4.2..te..--N-- _ /71/i t 6._-_ - - Ca.. .9?.04.,a--*__ I .?-41"‘‘ i /.-ic-i..e _ I . 1 • I Sw 11/E: " NvJ a if l�� s c� nuD I I_, 7 ...5+ 4-r riPr-.tom- 4ia5 !- I ) 0- - .( ----- -- - - ------ -- 22/e_ ina_vioLti.lvpda.4.- 7-5 ee_,qeAr2k4. — — - • - - "• - --p' Ado?-_- -ro - J -- - - :1•? ,vim pi i(/ v N C I1 ia-5 _1 P L 5 i. 1740( Q_ 1700 ` . ti,_-\ s c/u- I2 Jp LLZ-- 5 -e-__-- 4_42 air_ - P-,›aL 04) iv z.Trnw . 1 -- -------------- I S ITA f� s-4InJ 5 -G9/16 - -- Fig �oAc)��tQ -- 4. I A Ix-A& ,/z.--. . Jew , 1 , I 111 _I 1 iivi I Afilkirillfililli , ....._ ..--._?,34,....c..,h,-- ______ �1 ( I — i _ ____ i i t I _ 5:11_3:::±t .., L_ 7 Li/F71 0 Ii ?,1:6______ r._,/ -- rC-4-4C'a4.1- ;n ' IC,i-r•ti5,- 1_ 0 (.2___ _i_ 8:- I I - _ frhp_d_ 73 fu kl..a L 4,‹../Lc. 1 pi.,,,..1___(.. ...11.__IF__ _7:_ 173._L__ __ _Ada_ Re.)4Q;r) __ 40.1'- t:16C,k-14-0i,k4i C) 4/V I QV-KJ_144.2.1.4e_iL_Ai ilLYli_lipti.L _ - -- - --- - apri 7:0_ __Lkm_red___5_La4.e.... -2__ ' I — atiord_ -772 anrroet-L_ .042 .14.2f..it ;..0 'L-.' 7esty 4.;el ii r 4,A-r 1241.) 1414•JIA____ ______ IClic., ___01/±1 —___AA21- itte__ po ncaleI 1.,,A-). 11 1-0 14 HA Y . Ta •1_T-Ay n Ad 4 .1.,_ Iitai fa.e,/0112-AJ I ( ._.c- 3 PALA 1 0-cc A.12._ (ro gf-/1 1) 5- $' A FAL,/ 0A-1 :it. c l — A isi 51---- pc ‘ /2 S.-`? CAT-4/ GS f C A il.. II t" CA -Wfr "It, e i Aft . I 7 / Rere4iti•--) 2; ki../e/ . — . I --- 4i)47,..., // //..)a, _ - ) 1(5 ic _____ I I I 1,%a0 1 _ 71, - ,_ 1047t , 'RC1 a _`�z�_-s�K -- -- — /1i d � '�c � A 4-) - aS_ 11,2 s `- I 1 ---- - -- - - - . '. It 1 , y I I - 5 -- -...--7 i 3[4_ 1 "D, _tc3i- --- v./; IJ--r - a' _ � 4 I - - -- rriltulih - I'I -.44.4.„.,... .................> I i _ _________ _ ---ccor-___ __8_,--_ frix_e.-____o- ____c=iir" /.2-Aii rt..... _ 1 i 1 ' - ' wqs ! 3 5- ? ad. cA--44 CIA;!Lz of -E A. 5L z 1. �l T49 V - _ 9CA 1 - 4715 _ C.vo� 1 s, �`- �»-�,4�.�Ti ! _±_)viggi____Ftyt I I - 1±1:. ---:- 4 pp , I , Pl a ---/Z0d-_ 1 - PI 7? � ►7 PNS-6 .1_ r�rti Ar JD /E - AO 1 - - I I "-/97--i 0 I lag.:---_,,,.-.4.) D Ipro /L. , rc_ A,Q D Lk.i4.1 10<4.- Pa 07" I (I VY e. v cCit.i I iv -r r..o4 2_ App < /a. ' 6.-/' Abovc'...- 9 ,i,z..tr../D i.,,2.-QA I (a t a-- 1 --?/ .SN ?Ho to Look; :..vzs`7 A 1 1^d(2, T/y; u,,t,/f a ti sou 1 1 soak a.- - --P -o fwzizyv---r _ _ ,������ \ , 137 N) PC:f . - --(>-------7-"T io ' Il 41'7w Re. A I — i 4r, ________.mumiunnmmmnmm....m..n.......i.m.iimni..........miu...7-- --- --- r1-1-i%i--/- :'I I I I _ I _ __ _ _ I i I - - T I .J) _ , . . I -1 - - - - ,--, I _ CLDI ____ __ _, . , . 3 -*" I 1 I L442.,„_ __ I - _ 1 - -- ----- / 1 / Ci_lfrl _1,e1C_hieCi< - fit, 5_ Le-417 rat.. . le_____ 4-t}oAAo- I I _____ • 11 11 ' 1 _ i...././0:04,t./6/4e..4...„ ____________ ___ __ ___ I i I I I - • I I - ---- ------ ----- ._ - W p 2._L -:.( 4-_1L _ A x4/-r iL_f Az - _ I _ _- ___ I _ __ ____ _i__ -ri_12.41.H . _2_-__' '._ _ _ _ -- —-3 1.1)__ P __ / T-o ,A I - ._— 4'7d/7, 7a r, Gc i elf, -rhe_ wA`rw c.ue7/ - 111 Lt fll_i_.4 s u1. 77.1 cv$tTh A! 'S/11 1I2 nierA/ i-tid_ _ i att-kc4C T/O /h 11le4,I, e4/o11-, -1/) 1,41 W _ GO K Ciare1Gt Ce,.p---nom Ai a_c s; r‘.a_____MW._-- . — - ii- a .: .SCS 6-4- •03 , ir v P,4_, T -re, 1 .4,c, T/1/-"6% ,a g-1 . i._o(-A.1 i ten.5 I — <.veu r &t�. s r�,n _of_ S te- �.--FZ4--- c4, - ..r.c2-e/! - fa,,y0 -tri___- .tial .X41 r4 ere-L) --- . G_ *t_______ - tel I t-1 . _ __will I I I -i.k- ( Q(d.-- ----_ _ 241±-7 //77/111 . I -- -- -'e'-' 732----P42-:--V. -12_-_ IL-2,s, '"( c 0 t k)4.:11:7-_ - 1?- 2n , _ �ti f tar� , 4. 1 - Se_YeE.A _ 41_1'19 S _ 49 vd�. 4 c ' , _. II _ _ 1 +� L. t[��Y A I� Lja P -- - - -- -- - - I - ---. 7),44_ S: 're, /S. - etc ecA-- _b 7_-'z Q4, ALLe_ - --- --- -ki'l -1='-- 4)_zt....,____ I f o,Lr l.S._-AnL - I ----------cr;we -- ._- y.._ _-p_4p _A.i_. -_v_ ' - - -1 -i. u+.1,. .` Q Ate. - 7- !2r'M e___--i,-.q --C.��- ._____ I ---------- Veti O N "^' - . :_+ A. - ?' 'off ��G 1 <ClIveAx4. ,AA1 r -' -r{�/ Q_ A .� . 1 '1.. c,��,v -STeo p v , _ ;O (L ei..t. 'c v4p 0 .t ,`A. A pi i'l' I (1-2... OuC- -7-' 1 AGt, T C!ac cF4,I f a bq Cr__ rF'44,4-1. si iLOY[i./;;) iN Se ylit 41 H44,- ay e e.s - ///-. - -;any , , N. \\ \' �r I I 1 PticzTO CT(as, /-1 LO CI- ' i sC_Rp 7,a A.1 -re in e . JL I I //0 111 _ p_Ll_e_ 1 iti II- 2Io_ i-oof;fr.( I.V2-Thar_37- A. 7 /i;, 1 sk/Aedd,en___AAd. _ incici-1 pi fez, cm/ I i i — — -- --_ I /- Y.3 . _ .S.4_47 ptn ia-ra_Loc2K eek .aziri4c-Qe.1:---- AT' IL ;S I VV c)i paz pe_At 7 - I - Ps 35 Ptio f el 2-ce>e<i'vt 1.129„1-1-1_111___ 11.3_5_ 1 ri..42carc.c2.&). NJ I / —PC„ Cl.: —r6 / — p/ 57 PALiedz_ha I i J --.)-- c3 LOC S renAl __.sLrist.,, I V VV I VXtV _I _V I -7_7 :-.e-- . , I____ _ _ - .1 I I ,c. - — L. 'J . 22 ��0 _$_'_. 1 57.1' P,C . -cRAFt1 =-�/ - . N I �r' ) )e.s Com.F7',_ 12_ -7-1 w1 C. r 0 J s i 0 'PN'' ic.:,nct km7'71 eft'T - -J-iL5 Pc-7- Larze. zhaib p I-r- _i -- --- — --- i:\7._(Lo,i,eit_17 II - Ptc35 I1 P40�0 o.Sir Sou -r-i T- A7- /;-o F axATIe s Tion) c iVorZTh IGAcfoAJ I /-7 PIikj5I . ?hba 4...,30 .,nt A.)o tkri-i_‘,Qc%7_A r . . lao..Y. ------ ---------- i1,b2Th(ca,v_pac u,J -d-E - AJo. 2,:rle do _ L- Pf 3 S/ 3 --=Laki().-! ` `- ---- 6ve-sr A r / J() sl I - - 5o411 £ ' o v ---- 1 _..l -P_ty_fit- Pfl -Lan soo-cfr u.xt r l aZ 2- 1 ` - _ , '., r a....__I _ C4.77-/afez7- /3 / - - _. -Z 1.4)0e.. .KI)LZk�/1 -. sot _.G___ f Ca�iacria4 I - 1_-___PilayS14.___ 1-)1/07e-is 44),kii,, _,cen,,TH_ ,,,_2- 6"nak;clei____Liv__ gC2._az _ 92,be1G. ra -o I ----------- - Ml ----- - ---- ' lea- - /#/46______ -- - -i_i_i_ll i t r/ -1)/-6774-22. ,+�o � D c sc -lv,v 7 - P11 .517 p.Holo 1-co Pc( � a�— s� h oLtSe.- 5 r � /- PSSc PHOT 1-4)0K wc5r Ai I#lv2. 9 A.S - (Y)on' rott.i.nt LCX// o/V SooTh-I S jam. G.Akie,ec,ll -t t?J PNo iQ- Co :r9 eAS r A r /4/ 7 • - -—#i 1 1 / klz I rte- - 'i- `.'/() S-04,1,77-1,2_( w yap.,� 1 - I _ _ • QAL5L I E- r'x) . PEC.---r & - - r-�75bAy 4-, /9!O lU v S_ Perzo iv l I _ .24d_ a'. A(..)_ . (_ _-_-_-__-_6_M _ _ . 10J/Zp-1-- l4;/`-/y0 _ _f ---CASA lllz *a_- -.LI / - , z l?, ,.a I i ILA vim_ _RAD ,N q/q c,_ 1 piezrzde,z,&_s_,_____________ ____ -_- -__ I ___ _ 441/2 /t14t 5 ?‘ t 7.3f6,$I - - ---- C44 I yI y (- _ 25 . 6 . -- - . 1r _ 7-3(_ /_5 - 1 - a', _ ._ .T15 iyfao - _ w' jo -- C.u-e A-r1,teA�: 11L1) T r -- ------ I - -Oo. - / 13)---,__/.7,4)&_ - - — - - -- I r;TAIr<C" I 19 /X,#e) -4j0,042.4""410 1 I PRIME PURVEYORS INC. :F=_• Complete Food Supplies - P.O. BOX 201 • PECONIC. NEW YORK 11958 (516)- 765-2717 -7141( SOLO TO OATS 1445/04 0;S;GG ------ A 89761 I3 $ Cr n /a ova/ T2't/kZ 7-73 L rc ( wA� Cil Iec.7es�. u� `� y2.7 4:4-4.)-e)--1 A-)u s Co , ( ; ;. r/ T") 5o �� CAN7-fL A c. s,-a1.) _ 25 - _ aI -1Yo ' --- --- - r'� Cis i .. ____i_79, _-_.c2_&___Ld.k/u4_, .____________. _ _co(Ai krz.) ISth.<77Yol�- 42LlA1- 1J2 - — — : 4 --7'. -iii&a.-r. o___ .0_4„.4.7AL-Jerz...__,,z-4_,..___ ay-, '- ----p SII Ss/o/1 _To_ c4,//0 r__ 5 ,,i . -C�-- --- - - -- iUc.A2 _ _� 1 - - - -----r o v 7"---IlL � . _________ ��✓Q� /m.-6_-- i10 - .ar f all- --p?r . � ___Li_. s_ .410,J,4.___ _ ate _ LLS..__TR-p t3ci i. _ _Tat.KA_callicr ' weIL NSD +Tea,_i_N sl)v• oN- rG� Lo ----- cke e,Q. tux- a PiJ si G.U.)-F --g'i-''\It' I1 VD R s pfleASe 2 vr4 midi 4—1C_ _(_ .- I y P 1 s prcRVw1 cv, -rq 7..W_C.'.. ACID _______ i-- SACAlg-a44410 4ti MI 1); cLiNce., Fc.p ii . -- - A `• Y, r , • 4env /1'litdf,' Li. 0 • l. G - "" . '.1- ( ____ __:(4 ____:&,/6-zzit—. � �- r ,?o i MIMI IIIIII MI -. -- mill mill mill mill mil mall Nil Nil nil Nil mill will Nil will 1 .• ._-7_____‘-- 7-1\ //,'(___,_ X o9 \ / 4 0. . . ... . .„ . • . . •• .„; , ...„ , ... .t ,..„ .., v .v.,, ., ..,4 -\ U.1 ' • %/ 0— ' -4'; .' -,'\ '-- ....‘ - f'; •V — ,,,,'‘' —..1-.'. . '...'.•:".`. , '4$P•'' . .., ..i 5 ,,,, if.5,•,..i k•mt,4 1 f s:'",w:".::4,,,,,:t.'.;•:.. K / .• „ %,111.1114N • 1 ••'.•4 .• jilt ••s`..'S.t. . . r,, ,' . 11t ‘, L. ''''' '' ' 4,_ . .........• ,,,,t, . , p, .t. #4, : r .I. 1 \ 4•0 , / i • ..-• ,• ...- CS iI ..1:. li y.• .\ 0• • I/ /*\ I ' 's, I / •s f 17), 4 ': s . . , 1 ._, \ ...• .it, , / . N t / .,.).... . „,.._ \/ .... ). , ., • ‘ )•.'; • ,• .4 / — A.-......„.- -_,,,,,,r-,- ,-,,,!iii , -,..,A„. . .. ' •,,, . •-te an 11 C., / \ / .•/ • •-- '•• -.11.-.:::*.• .,,WA _ _..• .•/(% ', ',( 1.:.= ...• 'N..' ir \ / 1 \ ,* .:/49 -,/ a 0'n,.: 1.011' ':;', :. %,w'r, • .:• , • _1,--Iji f • • *• ' ° OQ ' • % eiP • .' '•• e.: 5i1,••,Y ' • 1; '''', ' : r.. 4 .--- , SI - • , - / / • '; . * ) i. , . f . ,.8).0 .,-.--,... /4 • ••• • A N,gip. tO / q(v,,,,: i 4' 1 . '-,:tt• r" -4 2 \ / • .•.:A, ..: 6 •:N71F0 c‘ .." : / 1. .9/ .1 , , • • - ;-- 7 ... S •••• p ; .41\ 00,; /1ki / •k, r. ,. ,,,,..,•4Z) / ..0/ sa > • / 11144 j/ % : ': )1 '','. 'I'l elf 1,. • 1.. i * \ ..., •• V 0\ *.k '. I r' ..i ' p1'. \ ° / -1 • • I 'I ''' /.• ,,,,7• / •. ,• •s 0 .,. • 10 // v .__A..,,... ,\:•. .• . : • - ,..:. ... / 0 \',e,'. i. E 11 \*...\ ,\•.:- ., ' N` IV : 6%& ,. .0, .14, ; ,,. . . . • . .), .,/,. "t \:::' ::-f:-::,r•-.‘ . ' 1,--:----..---'4-....: 1 -?:•?.?.. . ....—/ -t_< . , • 7 --. 1, ,,v, r / ? : (: . If-? ---, --- . J ;/ ,. •. • / , . . • • / I. - \--77---- // .' \\ ,,,,.. • ier i, iofr, . ,04,., .. ).• . , / o ;,‘/7 / ... . _I,., \ cl: . i • , . li • : - - / /-'! 41 -1.' '. c.b \ % .i'l \ • i „. ji'i74/, --•---;:2/ .,: it /..10 •',it/ ,'••' t y / ,- / 4.411/1" /.-• . .5 / t•• • / : 4 ..--.V.:: SOUTHOLD 5 5 Mi U 1\3 --tsp IL ' I 1 k I 1 ' I 1 1 1 ' I . ' 1 \ '''\..I I 1 , 1 1.' ... I L . \ k, I 1 LTi1 /IO Lr Cc - ilii" -``c 26 = ! 'a vet 7 CA o4 o f 7 1 - ( 5 e. pA A4Dre.e- �16,� - --- -- --- -------- ---- ------ _ __ _11.���.5 p��a lies. � �/�N�A 0 - ---- _ — - II -' 2 I — - i(.b Cld.D _ s. Ye...._ 66 c.j L'o --/61., 7 __ _ _ ___ 6 /kJ Avit_N_L- Zbi 1,4 . . k. 170 A c pcte. cn-ve-cA:-._ ,4,:1-1-1. 1-/C I-- (6__a4„p, \. ::,,,* ,,, _i_ .5-r_ 1-i4L_ _. a-7E_ `� Ni -- R te- a4 7 II i/ IL, p,,,� ud -c;MA. d (-1_� 2<-f C• ,``.Q__ ,Ii - tic--TA.A. s_ -- - •••. NPi 8 /()e_/I i A P Pri- . 01 -Ecel -1-)e-Cp_ 1 /' 4 j - - A cc-4Q-D,n 7-0 m(1 , Q, BC-t_. — \ 1 y -- — IUo'���y_K- -Ic.-€. 44-__--SQA If-r_- -- ----- iiii ----•.N well hied)D R k 1 r'- S- a t 3ui a 47/' . __ Le c�►�,`e n _ ��(�1a v A � , Tit �s �.--�4a.1x_5�'�.Yicts.j ��+_C- • 1T51 CD k L,L.t1 e- -- So u Trq o/Q AA w r lLk.--- - r 6TH, ?etz. »; S&__ ._ ' 2...__ p, g.8J. (s.. i.r..3,, ()to-5; I J a-- 11„...„ 7t7( �� _ 1 / A.«./ L. 'l (:(,c S ',-)-e S 5 co N, ,N ;,v A S i HG 0 2, •if,U A 1 f'`0cA!Oen S CIO S ti0 O LAC.- 1 S h'.0AnC i ih°i'''4 lir4 0 v--th Lit C.P\----:i b-N 0 .C. (\--;"(-4-) -(` ' • .7-1 e.- Pg r.t71 Ao 41 i it, hp2:VAre. 2eS,lovice_, we3T d T,,e 3usiireSS _ — _ t5�- Gw w <( b z. c) �cc,'zcz. -raves 'de., (10,.s L Aca-0 S S w< <L �Je �. S17.14..e./. _ _______ _ _ ___ ____ ___ _ ___ __ _ _ _ ._ ____ _ __ _ . ______1 14_0. 2 .0/ ..t......7// A' /(?'d _.._- ....i.2)........._6.L.,...., wri" --____ "_--__-_-_-_-__-. _ I I - 5O L; FWD(:� i- / fid.-�O0 - S5 Z7 i'?-77 .0 - 1 111 "70 k D ‘-oc.A--a 1 0 c G -Z.-7- I£ A. p R.;y A e ,2e...s l iti ..e_, ITo h AJ -h o 3 fG /l E)- S- 02e C,-o a PO c. v Cl-iaVic..-.Air'I93S -- - SS - 15 72.452.,ve.D 0 Li LA-/IN _ l S 0.0 i 's v..), (t be. Co /Lex,1—n, sA•1.lc.- - ` .,_ ours c sI _ s rc . -f___ Ta elleoti Ap SS J - - - ICo ti.-p 3 7 ,I, � — _ ----- 1 %-L_Q IYo A_S____ PGs&& v_ .Q w, 7A 7/C/ (C,=, Die s -as 4PeaY-lam-_h- - __/.0L iz1 c+ A - - — w A re.L- HA% bce^i pun- cga- -�- is .►',;(e42�S--- - 1 k, DL .s . _ - -- 1 - --- _-ate- ; 3 - - 3S A ? lo T f r01).ke- 11 A_ _ 3 Pip1L-1v . /.tiL - --- __., qt7ti, �i% /o7,�� a il. --. 7 o I ir c ) ____ ___ _ _____ ____ _ ____ __ . __ ____ __ mov, ,c__AT, Jil 0 C &Li-)-,-.: —Ole_ ----- ;11' i'2 1 v P R. Re S --eA)c.2 .,U N !Ghi cvry s -7-4,,e_ o n_ ,N J — cyeS ,AAief[, c . LDcA�,o ) ; S A, ‘-‘pl — - GQ Co(/e c.1 54 f-pl.c. 4 - -, f-lv Li s c.. AC (2-0 s s 7,444,- rize.e . "5 .�, -- - F _ i_. C:=2- VA-,765‘1-1--' /aZ b /./t/7,1 lc ....eial..„4....._(,)..,...? i f -- �O- `' '_� is L ^d_- _ ,� 8 1 � - - r _ 41 Q V 0- - f--oc_eN-770,().. a -k-N ":m-605_ a.:. - 5- a.:a t.,T'- c5; c,e_,... IC .44C '34-, it Svcs Fa(2-e, ) 11...,puf6 Cur ct, c,Jct tiC_w iva.<-- Go% j rh,.s�,,,tr Fr24v✓1 ID,A tie— 41G /El;C.4:.C. t' o (✓(JR : _ I Sif 7I, - -7-724:"../ C.P!1QJ1a IA) -E,_L_r,./... v .2 Tae-A 1'164 ' *,, 7?--;nl, IAlp gazAa/L S_ P_ aw._. lJt90..:�clawu n.i/) o u /kid N, £JLQ _N f l_ - P1 5E.i...xQ._ W ; '7-1 d C L... / io c:a.op S.,i ci . . I ,i, _+ tio_ Po Ll P -" _ v</r'l/i- Ah,'n.;L. /1‘,‘ 'D _ — - i _d kf1ii,n_ o- /SIL f-e, CTA/411 rev`... - - - — f 'c -- - - i OLe1H d Tyle. tAx-i_ J L . u) tow _ - —Q4-- �-I- — – — 1 - _ R1 -<_r ,t-k.,11 . I-, 4V(.7711 _ * ------_,. ...f,reir,,i,d_4,7 9,2___ L. . ., ___ i -411 I I G� y/_ I +--- . .._- a A 1 ...---- NJ0-7 --7,7 cA le.., • 1P�5� flt --- - �a`L;,yr' / 2�i i :it. 1 1 i [..14,-)D ''it 41 .1 Gw l i /1 -- - J ` • ,.w�.►.• Lib \I �'C I 7g-1-,/} --•. ('VC/6 3/1 / j., cjgow,,,,,,,.Lia....--4-7 I -111111-11 I I J I -- __ --- C LL i ry:) ,c�- ! , o---- `;'24) S- 4-q 29 I Ma v Loc. a.. v ,.,-) ---- Pi27;VAre.. _Res , _ a,� -fes rFa'L.t- - r80 x ._l 5 5 Fke.., t2 --- - 1 _G T rP ,SSS pn F/?VNAn n/17-e S _/1_45o/) - — --- CaL l eC_ t 1 P SA . 1e,._-qC.r,,,v,'_-_, o ci r 5t L_-- --- 10 —--riAa L '`' O ti' CS A 0-1_. - -------- -- - -- - _--- I / - - - --- 10d Dsen5 ALZo,x_ n BAcK.9 -04)ma_Q,y '4`,L-Z_ , /) ICVO 2::*fit,2 5en_vee cli;- H NCL .11 git,91 P7 41� . cin VIZO c v� Militi� A C,'v Li az.)0. 53 i\ , _______/614-0 1 Plie,reC ,e) WI'le-c-____CTA_ Avie/L.____ Ig,Q_rr App,wx, r s ecr .c.,"? . I ilj ell 1. _Appa_bx.:Inryi -1,4 41 ___c_cf.,r_r/24,vvi - _/�O 'C r l L - -- - - ---- PA , 1‘.......-4,7 _41cam (�fgam . ./ ' 10 I I I - t _ Q 30 It/y/'D 1 "eA l e A ti 3_ �� H,) Z,! ova M rd�C 5 i� P(�11 n : .".' -DA V All. 3 A n-p/,t- 5 Y,u.� - ,'T N ,c{�, 1 _ _ I - I _- - - I -- — I — — -- — ..--- -- ------- _______-&-_ --1g , — — — - - - --- 1 I .5 c,:AT riv,iJ / J€ > dprL - 4W-iv )/c C_)_. A.• / ON S, -1-E LAJ Pic,/ , an c.vCpA.ic.S oA7Ec . SJ X94 p Al(I s PGR-� '/iJ Ne.' : I R / JA J E t Z s il-, ;/d,, /;-f 5 9 b III l, � -k. 4-n /A ss - r / DARE F...on_',u SA''-()1vz 1) WY •,,,,L i ._l /?o I771 - 4 b 'vt. tz2so,unae/ H4 ve_ ALAI) A 2- 4.0-44%.1271,,-,0 T w 4 Lk PGA it.) A ti Q C tijcl C p rt_ c cacewzbs . I 4 a ,,p �o : _ /A '4 I I � 9 75-3 /�;'- sCpe Ga.;' 76 j1,U . 'K" ?7 'i ?HBc.'f 6�7so L'i- - - nilki RAD 73/ 6i 2 SC/36 s ‘g is.3 G. I CA eeA 73/ 05 L'ooeTo C4 624 SO/ L GBJS39 Ic:D/hy.)A s s --13' 681f /74 .c4.//7 eiii)A4G77r. r reiv ( 9 775 - -- - -- a _ i-�a7m. ra- • ILU eATfie , d- 3`f L _ ) cti-.', ,e),74 Acptiom_. .141-30'"o N 4-44.Alalzitti 34 0... (), -C14 I I -- —- - f ' D (1,1. -,_- _,_77 /7 I 41 I I 0-7 5 0 TR;P a A) ' ; . spec. otv s : e. __C7 by '� RJ CN PGAiip ,Jti t, A-, 4 'A '7 -',Le-e. J - Of 14 QCaog � C.46;n 1 ANA/`y'7e % "�n-e,�. i�ATN- F.- -� /U Lit �L�$ 47'.— v i P, r�.�,�.. r • -2--/;- ----t--. 1 ?,25/y6 li 1 A., thA . •,4-)....... at-s,..,...e.,-, /2744 _____- I I -_-_- ✓ — — -- - ��� �i _ � JOU 7 32 , _ - 7d7.3.-/fe) I Uc..N\-) '5 . c_ 071 r • ,__--- gY <c- S C 7-- (� 7'141.-,t (:D lu:c p. D& ' 0750 pgoa RLi1+ Co 1/ 7e. .0 A) aA;!tri ll 01 i0 44.1 _ c_ :4l/�1 _-i<— L- vis ,-�f,-y (- r�✓z-.:(2.-C, �Lt r cvv4,.: - cti_-h,c�/ •Ae.,-:Ac1�s i t�H)+� 4 /,c_ 19Jccf_ PPE ,. r—./c !-/iF.'j�/ /-1/Uct = 0 P F=., % rB I :/,) nl,%v• k.4-L = 17 OE 2 6 rd._ e)'e -c,ve it C-P in a Jas Co 0 G `7`'S i�V S cal R,NsArL 41 iv A41 Cf,- - -- - :,<_-r,_,„.2 4, e......, IOf 5: 4- p..o.e., /„..,a ci„A, ,„ (1, 6,..., 4 1 (Z.....K.a. ° 'well ID I cJ .'-LX 73 53 - ---- 0-6 v-e, ' 60 8-i_S3 f - I () N., A :: L23.42112).__Eik&TAP±lE_J-LetiLapeo-Lat______-_ - - — -_(- .L.11..) li7-5C rC _- W1 � u I -,--• i_ - i n ro la I, /-- /,..-1/so — 46e-g.,.. I gis-/f.G' 044,„,„:-.--C.L._"_1 1 hI111 1 I NMI 1111Nil- - r Mel r r N V N - N N MB 1 i • y' „_....-..-CAPACITIES, IN U. S. GALLONS. OF CYLINDERS OF VARIOUS DIAMETERS sNQ LENGTHS 11 ik Mow. LENGTH OF CYLINDER p;.,.. 'saws hcIu.. I. 1' S' I 6' I 7' 0' 9' 10' II' 12' 13' 14' IS' 16' I 17' I1' 20' 22' 24' 1 0 04 0 201 0 24 0 26 0 32 0 36 0.40 0.44 0.41 0_22 056 060 0.64 0.60 0 72 000 0 401 096 I 2 0 01 0.16 000 096 1 12 1 21 1.44 1.60 1.76 1.92 2.04 2.24 2 40 2.56 2.72 2 SO 320 3 52 3 14 2 3 0.03 0.37 1 M 21.20 256 2.92 3 3.61 4.04 4.40 4 76 5.12 1.41 S 04 6.22 6.60 7 34 0 06 0 00 3 4 0.01 0 65 3.26 3.92 4 56 5.24 ($.000 6.21E 7.10. 7.14 0 814 8 02 I0.1 11.1 11.6 13.4 1. 4_ ail) 4 P _,.. S . 000 1.02 1.10 6.12 7.14 1.16 0 10.2 11.2 12.2 13.3 1•.3 11.3 16.3 17.3 10.4 20 4 22.4 24 4 S 6 7 0 0.12 1.17 7.34 000 10.3 11.0 13.3 40.7 16.1 U.6 19.1 20.6 22 0 23.6 25.0 26.4 tf 4 32 2 35.2 6 0.17 2.00 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 10.0 30.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 20.0 30.0 32.0 34.0 36.0 40 0 44 0 11.0 7 0.22 2.61 13 0 15.6 10 2 20 0 23 4 26.0 20 6 31.2 33.0 36.4 39.0 •1.6 44.2 16.0 12.0 17.2 62 4 0 f 0.20 3.31 16 3 19 O 23.1 26.4 21.0 33.0 36.6 38.6 43.0 16.2 49.6 SL 5 56.2 60 0 16.0 77.4 71 2 9 10 0.34 4.00 20.4 24.4 20.6 32.6 36.5 60.1 11.0 40.0 12.0 16.1 61.0 65.2 69.4 73.6 II 6 19 6 97 6 10 II 0 41 4.94 24 6 29 6 34.6 39.4 44.4 41.2 01.2 69 2 64.2 69.2 74.0 70.0 03.1 88.8 10.4 104. 111. 11 12 0.49 1.16 29.4 31 2 41.0 16.0 12.0 11.0 64.6 70.4 76.2 02.0 07.0 93.6 119.6 106. 118. 129. 1.1. 12 (_A �\ 13 0.17 6.90 3. 6 41 6 48.6 SS 2 62.2 69.3 76.2 63.2 10.2 97.2 104. 110. 117. 124. 130. 152. 166. 13 0 14 0 17 000 40.0 K 0 56.0 N 0 72.0 00.0 40.0 96.0 106. 112. 130. 12$. 136. 144. 160. 176. *92. 14 13 0.77 9.10 46 0 16 2 64.4 73.6 02.0 92.0 101. 110. 120. 129. 130. 1.7. 154. 166. 106. 202. 220. IS O16 0 07 10.6 52.0 62.4 72.0 03.2 93.6 106. 114. 12S. 136. 116. 116. 166. 177. IU. 200. 229. 250. 16 17 0.90 11.1 59.0 70.0 01.6 94.4 106. 110. I30. 162. 113. 163. 177. 101. 201. 212. 236. 260. 213. 17 S 10 1.10 13.2 66.0 79.2 92.6 106. III. 133. 1.5. ISO. 172. 166. 190. 211. 224. 240. 264. 290. 317. 10 19 1.23 14.7 73 6 11.4 103. 110. 133. 1.7. 162. 177. 192. 206. 221. 23S. 250. 266. 291. 324. 354. 19 , 20 1.36 16.3 01.6 90.0 114. 130. 1.7. 163. ISO. 196. 213. 229. 241. 261. 277. 2114. 326. 30. 392. 20 31 1.10 10.0 90.0 100. 126. 1.4. 162. 100. I90. 216. 230. 252. 270. 21$. 306. 324. 360. 396. 432. 21 22 1.66 19.0 99.0 119. 139. I16. 170. 190. 210. 230. 257. 277. 297. 317. 337. 316. 396. 636. 474. 22 23 1.00 21.6 100. 130. 111. 173. 194. 216. 230. 200. 201. 302. 324. 346. 367. 309. 433. 476. S10. 23 24 1.96 23.1 110. 401. 166. 188. 212. 331. 30. 302. 306. 330. 353. 376. 400. 424. 470. 510. 1164. 24 2S 2.12 20.1 120. 113. 178. 204. 230. 250. 301. 306. 333. 310. 301. 600. 436. 460. 510. $62. 612. 24 26 2.30 27.6 130. 116. 193. 221. 260. 276. 304. 331. 369. 311. 414. 442. 470. 496. 162. 600. 662. 26 27 2.40 20.7 140. 170. 300. 230. 267. 297. 326. 366. 316. 416. 436. 476. 506. 636. 594. 652. 712. 27 20 3 67 32.0 160. 192. 224. 254. 21$. 320. 362. 340. 416. 440. 480. 112. 544. 574. 640. 704. 760. 20 29 2.06 34.3 171. 306. 2.0. 276. 309. 363. 377. 412. 116. 410. 116. $41. 101. 616. 606. 764. 024. 29 30 306 36.7 109. 230. 217. 294. 330. 367. 404. 440. 476. 116. $141. 616. 626. 660. 734. 006. 600. 30 32 3.•1 41.0 309. 251. 283. 334. 376. 110. 460. SO2. 140. 106. 630. 660. 710. 912. 636. 120. 1006. 32 \ 34 3.93 47.2 236. 202. 330. 370. 424. 672. 620. 560. 616. 660. 100. 766. 003. 400. 916. 1040. 1132. 34 , >7- 34 4.41 62.8 266. 317. 370. 432. 476. 120. 101. 636. 61$. 748. 992. 044. 010. 913. 1016. 1164. 12114. 36 P k k, k " , \ ' ' ' . I k k \ \ \ \ \- I . ,I � � G , , l (.) 5 1 (. .1.-A, ...,z, A• '- c.C1_,. FN\i C-, —C: " , r,-- 1 � ,�, f�� �z�tu) HIll „ vi.t i .. Tr+ 1 t_ilt2:1 wA1:Z Cts 1l.ciNA..) 5-7 - tl Li 11 14 = 1 6. 7 <* .) -z 3 i. 4 - ,3 7. .1 Si ,►lla.kv s xILT_____41tAit -'” 111 . 111. 7174716 voiame S) r- 11 s )Y iti w 5 ^ ��37 �� cZ Ser- 1. =� x�� �?.�7 x a,5 szG � , . Sur S To puta_ci` 3_14144vti6s cc; c,),7.-: 6,_0_ "z- 9. 3 ;... sir 444 — - - ? ' P3 ?isia .Q-F �atCyi' c.r — 2AIS 47C., d, , ra _ , ' .. 1 404. . 0_?•03- _ .._ _ / c.)1_, ,a_ g_LN ;._4_c_,./(ec-ra:- 12.: NS A-re, 0 A-) .30;,4) » T I : - - -_ - - O t,�_,____--- —rc,�_ }`LAS_I' '1'� . ,T.-t F.,o t eiht --- _____(:),_,:r a? ,L,c.r?-l1— (J Ulti A wr ola ip CV A ' v f)"f-o 770 _p._,y-_‘._. (ifi...ed:41N-,--_-0a)_ _ ____ i \ .32 _ _ _ _____ Ilil - - ---_y --7--z"-, i n i____ (1 /0 _. / .. ---*1-1"--4-.6----1-_0(-#___, &AA-4-1 vi_i���9a ___ _. ____ _ . _ _ _ 1 1 I IIIW- --- cD Wi:-'10 34 . 5___ /;../',/_ - "' - - - 11 b 3 - _ STc 1=1 --�' '-Btu Y1 (.P4a.A-�c� (.5 m ---/ --- I1o_L0- _G.14111,2,4— +. DAvf- .-_ A 1 - --- --- -------- ---------- --- J 47_,.2.___ F — I �'c2_�— - - - -- -- ---- c' r�N _ cd. ,uax. I p- VV A. P_14.6ec- .G2 '-11gG 1-._ ro Oa s - - - 'Q-/jQ----- - �7--- -- - LQ- _-,1_._r_t_ta7 L--E__d. 2.e PACr.1CI -. W 3 A + .2.NY i(Lc'/1 '^Q,4 ( De-Le '-'v+'L i"-C. `?_ 3_ 7 -_J U 3 0 DAV. _A__40 CA, Le. 0 HL(1.... I I ________ 4204.... ., Z:7---e-ji _Z---',.... / '� I I <c1"' 7-70i f_-' moi- iDDY- t, F 3 '',;:',/;?Z2 I / r--..e-n.,11.-.) - p c-C.fl,-/ A --2.!'s I (in) i?4,10 (o A) ..,44 r&t, *A1:5c.,4" ILI l',44.14 j,(1 ) I' c,,2�t.� VAI"v s 1 By P'' 5 I ! /zI.,:i _7—As al ,<... — Na 771.eA i mG?Tr or-, pc-u14-E,Ar 1 .5y i-7.- 4,. I //O .S S(i- Q—T Fc ✓„ , ^ GA-"A A oaisa� '5.-S-P c4oT - L-galc. vaiz.,olc.. s plo r c-kscag• r o //,, h-IL -Muck. s_ Ji O sT0 p ,Ips,,,''—�, "t G ,C,b aiNy 3 Abaud LAc nun, 'fro OA OVA; AIN..., mitt') .' ati 111 3& c yes 5 s ' P i7 ;- 5 A ?Hon ,) a1 Al►iLZ a , c)lt N 1 G' - _I . 7 , . - //t_ Z-mr.A. cCL j 6,t5- .tiQaTii__q£__T4'e. Sou r 1 - - 1ldA 5. fi=t.-,ese,,cc, �: 1k /D ,f)(._1s fi'Ci.... I -- - Co.-.GDAd 7-)e ku.c _-P/11 Si c G ---- -- - 4Z/ de, e..._ pH-T--/)14.._mar_ fir - -- ---—- 1 - --- - +CL_ C_aAi , ----- --- ------------- ------ --- ----- Iu'4- .ges. 7-r�r c A7T._�)2 'N �.- _l✓�r�A--- - _ DLGLL._.PA2LG '(d4lPt-- -€4.14-)174;c1 rv4- A;44C/11 4-44Z -a1ATtri- 1 ---- tom.-u-Co,X,--1Q—Cl/4 Sd ((/• Tg,1 i..----, ---- - - - i I .. �ii ___________ ___ ____ v� , \ _ : _�- �--- 1�is-":(----'4--*----4----A'—*s---: Ar D P/ I Lc-CI-to�L I ckl:,PI e_.: 74}-± irger ____ _____ _ _ ___ _ --r3....-,N tel( et ! i C Z..� C..'i __ _ -- ---- I s. '- ) _ Li,2Pg 1046 N \ \ 3 ---2--- N /Vo I — - ''t :7 �cNCL Tv -- -- --- .-....' \ '''-(.1 CI .1„ 4: 59 0Q� Sc^��.- - -- –► - 1►k� D Qr RoA U cj12‘" C/L*4'4 VY1onI roz� PG - le....: ---4: (-e r-, 54 ' A 3cAZn of 346 ° Fair, -Cu — .d€ ''?P` x a44) 4-44., I ( 1�;(R cc)i m t t►dc.v-e r,e err o�' a s rA a r c,_ ,vo r pass' �3 4c.. D,..c.�\ 1 `, TO (J,�e..Ve ' i e2nA a /v R N�. FSR. -7 P B ia/S�90 , i,/ ,// --___ 45',/V)0 I - - - _- <-- - 36 I -'7 - - ' — - L -_!..: rck....,_ f-- i el/si i 0 f,il 4 7 9 _..; 1 ------11 , Po vet. 'a ‘..21--, o-C) ri/le" r...) _ IA-II•7:p..,-1-1.7/ .5,_.C'eL_ n.4'_ . Layo..{‘; // --77:-. C.:,./4e 0_77-5 7_ _ -ri .... 1 1-7 fill rilfr".-//— .-61_44„.57r, 02,, 2-411 o 4.0 . I -.: ) PS L'y'lr-L- 4-_/Z%e_A_774.—( r: \vs) 0.c.-1Az-..4 -C_ ao 17_7C,L.-0,...., -7-ri 1, f , - r — Lj c_6-(1.4.,e1.a 4T -r 447.... iks,+1...• CatitiC-10_._ 1141/144 14 ,e)!..)..S:..r I Vit. 4 ,.‘ 'D _______ -- 7 IIAILI P Le. Go 1 leCruL ill — __ . ,,,,_)_. Se.--10L.e.— /4 ai-e..., °rZaft T34,i-4.1 I 1 7Z--- --C.. .L P1 tafrt.ro \ I a I i_l__j_l____4 ?I-14n 1 L., r.:-C.... s 7 1 . -__c ) - i's c,A711€4.1z;_ C-- A.s___ A bacl<ivLi AJO 50.41E,__ _ 774-c. .sri. I I.s pi e..4...m.:zivi a 4.0 4.. ..). - ‘21dc..cL42,21_44.,;e_ _ I _.,07_"... 64,ee,...e.,, c..4,//e2 JAI__sAii„fle.,, _ , . 1 I I ., , ^ 1 - 0 ----- . No , I- D 5�r . � --'\---\___)--... , L,./.........,-- - _.---________ ) r---------- ✓YJ� .�� /Jo 2 I -- ;1\ ----- , , i_ Likoo/v(ff',)i2."''") _ _ - - 'i *Ph_ ,: .,,___1P12. �_ J -P;-s -- �`° s i 2 P/0 1co O '7e; losiiirt 70' , .5 — k - -- — / 31_ Sr'ccP sLoP t s o,u 5,c'-e s c Q LAA o,)n 5 N)ncv cn�s — --- L�; z_cc,% Uu 1,7eA 5 � meErr T2v,•-. SA,rol-�. :v ct+�o,1 -rd., — - I '-Wce_y 'ii.oz.e.i-,).1.4.... D, 3 7,4oc4.1 AP..c.. csT.-,a 'e S . /Vv S (..tK!'LL V;S i Q!e_ rim lie • Us 4 �-7L- p, s.. -- ��J./psi/ 7?'Lt.e$ — 1 �' 111 AMO f32us f-/ $B 1��� 4 is" di-f" �Ocn I Jo'n p - 1 4,,iye/L, v -eo), e 3 4144CAA-791e, S(� S41, DWSC Doan- k� MA Tr/t,i.A l --____ .i p1 , c-c P_ 7- , , . h. /Y1 Aiiiiiimilimilmei.I I I 1 ' 504.,c7-101 ,.J F. 0 �'Cr0 f- 4. Q 37 r / �/Si 0 I ✓ o Y U i--0 Com, l0.^. o f S 7 / ,:V -7-,,,e... jGctTNrm� LAc•- 4,-D A) I e I og y} C 1�A 1 !Ise--- A„ID ave- o,J C I s — - - ..._(2= , l/ v;`1:.-,-,,2-M ell- Lv_ - l (.6, - er-o`J -r 1-ac,14._ - ■ I _7 o_v- i 1. _e__.17---C-- ...T-5 4 U v -1 0 0 •rt- � '1 • ii /- 31 —DA ye. A D C-1-A i i,c e k) A I!L TJ I A J3J3412411_ 1— 147 -7-0� /o '`'ile-s /IF) MczBi�St8D4N s l"_ Roy_f. :About. 44c-14'14 o,.Iv°_2-4-d--(314 dl/µ - C;Aii-ip_i-e.,. i S-- Loc.A ei r T 71T.... Co rm_ 411 A1144 $4 l/ 1!--e-CS SAM Fe�a.ve".... ffB 7-i — . T,{ �.A S.cy.a rl{ay�_Lf1 l AJ A 7 q Oi s II.Au� a2u, -/ T — — a IFS•Ago _-Q-f A? b_. Gtr_ ri-v�.-. _rtic_ X.5ni :�u us OL s; ty ••) l' 03, c - off-' A�' ' ,. yc/1p - _ 71CAt. AAe. _ ' prs Yi3���fROA Esc. DA kid C__3_,-;% '� D o c CLAi__Ajt.. r� �► iso SA,4-79Lt' iii, !1 <<q ; P� To Doc.r,.,..44T 1 . — - -- - - - --- �uT„y, ,ra4G -IZ2_G_ DFVC- a' C__'• `•`'C - _--__Pi;: - p 4? ` I ----------- ,1 -- /"Y___5;40 -010 iz.-,.„--.--_-__ . i t 7470_______ I I I IPPE I - - - -' 3$ ! -- --- hl- - 1 Siii;14 ,,...z._ I - - s c?, I �` t� Ca 1; �- i,1 .;,<_. 111 ndom- -- �'ua Wiz.`.. a c T 4,=� 11a,l..i i�tutN� d '?41.S Ja ------1—A_ ,.A p .%o X X. Low :.0 i .,,,ti, _s a.� 3 3 - n 4 -:; C , _A ate, !,, k.1 rs 1 r ,5cir r's A it/f/k1^ $ 0 I -_ — '. 9 S! -9d __- --- -- -- 1iC 3ai 1vS�uDy ,a-: Sz �••�., SA -pie_`LA s c.c.(le2l-8)-rt ,A 3,:,'4 64', l4," -ry epi. Kh4+- A j N c- A , a 12 1 C,VA 5-!.,r4CC., s 40 eAL /ooi.) PP -N 14° , I . 6), A0VO4.47-41 v F p e► 4 A ZejNO A. ,Vt r • - . it.: - .J : • • 4)AYL ,AA,O 0.4,,14....3 4041F-f A,'L • 1 I /-4,0e..,:‘,' , 4 i I I I .: ,z_ . /Y1 by o CA 71‘7 Y: o f 1 _5 to w.1/ ,_ q Sµ/2.CAc.- SAI pa ,awl spD 00 //{C.-fa4 -c."_.oTfrti• r Abet e2_74,/ • S/opt. I?-r. Vit' ilp pn_ox' %`,` a{ TNr ,-4,A y ,gyp "7-41C IS ,<<C.-- C77-,C.- -P,'7- •s Appvax. .15- 3o rt ,Dctp '1/e A - L-Ryer . o `F DA 2K I7 lie_ 1 i 6f-!. -t TAC-C. p.-7 a ""r#c LA 7e-,L.e- L. .5cr2-AP ,1,2 ;ti -7-/V P% Aacc,:., - , I 0 5 avc.. ,4,o 04,A,',2‘-._ 6./U 4-4Ve-i C _ I Pio Dmv CJ//e • .S G I - -- - ivy- QC,' o 4�� 1 - ---o . a v P ) nif/A,�2 41,U, ILA I 7471. L L.)6YG. A,v0 Ci_A ax_ A'S."f 44 ? t 1 Tt!e- ih9 Tens A L )..i r lA y e/ _ A444 RPpeAst-s a RAW- A per-Vic_ 5._Le.4c,21 ,e - A ca LY . -C - n De-pr- t D-G, J`tit'ieS I * ' - Aftim...,,_ fi---e<=-/"_ fc- t-i_ 4-__ • a-, /--7 -- -91:;* '-'614--4-1- - -a7/./ 2fit,I111 I I J Y �_� ^- 1 Ir\ iJDi 70 5CA( _ _ /k- 1 r 1- -_— — r &ev..)c0 Da"N , r3-745o n r1c.,4Se. 0 Vii" �2-y;«�Nt?� -- L, 1 _..-- - s3 1. - - :"/3 �1 �1 _ --- 34'. f • 2P r 1OF --I� J � _ 1 Q.G -- '7-Lr HMI `lG — E9sr PosT' (&i ,'v„ Q S I) W 15D8 i !i .;',/,._11;7.,,, /;1570 Csigorm„,,,,......6,16.0-4,-1 )47M0 ___iiiiii II I IOWlei ' ---‘-'-`1 --- - - - - _ _ -- �1��[ 1 ) --^ — — �,' > 27— 4 1 40 __ ____ ,,,,z ,/ya I - - - MA "5 -)/meq i— '2e---.i--1 ^ I14 5 IL_ .1.2kiz..‹..__.,, n_._, /.1.t._______.,,,_., _4yci I ....-,-„e, -- -14-5-9„2,37.- e 4"- Rt- c'cZ^'e� ,T_ -5 3 J I _----- -- rs-}- O -7-6G jvr S — sA1r ,_A ! `"_-�4''11� /r1- �9 at.eL2.n ct 3. e op' P, ✓, 57 .�/./L€ i-- --1-(2-0,--,71.1c, ' _ � dam /n fc � � -{-(t�.�5 7Nt, F A / Paz i a -6 TNG- 1,-.4.7a Q -- — The. 4.1.'44. r sem. 0 — I - -!/T7;// pia ,a/g4t90 T ,--- — ---- S 6; 3 ,.S 1-14i 4 r B'-o,J�' Ai Ade si _sAAJ Dp J OSI P,/, IN�I f✓irN. �� (,,.(_el ( I . 6A I I i ___ I . C'nnT INJ U )47/10 # ./ . \ prIMIWW, ' Pw(7 i I 1