HomeMy WebLinkAboutGroundwater Quality Assessment Report 7/1992�oS�FFOI�COG�rT
PART 360 AND PHASE II
GROUNDWATER DUALITY ASSESSMENT REPORT
JULY 1992 SAMPLING EVENT
Southold Landfill, Town of Southold
Suffolk County, New York
. DO
Dvirka and Bartilucci
Consulting Engineers
DECEMBER 1992
SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
PART 360 GROUNDWATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT REPORT
JULY 1992 SAMPLING EVENT
PREPARED FOR
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
NEW YORK
m
DVIRKA AND BARTILUCCI CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SYOSSET, NEW YORK
DECEMBER 1992
10950/3
1027
SO OLD LANDFILL
PART 360 GROUNDWATER QU ASSESSMENT REPORT
JULY 1992 SAMPLING EVENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
`I�
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION
2.1 Monitoring Well Sampling
2.2 Pump Decontamination Procedure
2.3 Private Well Sampling
2.4 Field Forms
2.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control
3.0 FINDINGS
3.1 Groundwater Flow Patterns
3. 1.1 Shallow Water Table
3.1.2 Deep Groundwater
3.2 Groundwater Sampling Results
3.2.1 Organic Sampling Results
3.2.2 Inorganic Sampling Results
3.2.3 Leachate Parameter Sampling Results
4.0 CONCLUSIONS
5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
A
APPENDIX A Field Forms
APPENDIX E Data Validation Report
S30950/2
1027 1
2-1
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
ks
3-1
3-1
3-1
3-5
3-5
3-13
3-22
LIST OF FIGURES
Title Page
1-1
Monitoring Well Sampling Locations
1-2
1-2
Private Water Supply Well Sampling Locations
1-3
3-1
Water Table Contour Map - July 22, 1992
3-2
3-2
Potentiometric Surface Contour Map - July 22, 1992
3-3
3-3
Organic Compounds Exceeding Class GA Groundwater
3-16
3-4
Standards/Guidelines
3-14
3-4
Inorganic Constituents Exceeding Class GA Groundwater
5-2
Standards/Guidelines
3-21
LIST OF TABLES
Number
D&
Page
2-1
Groundwater Elevations - July 22, 1992
2-2
3-1
Vertical Hydraulic Gradients at Each Well Cluster
3-4
3-2
Groundwater Sampling Results - Organic Compounds
3-6
3-3
Groundwater Sampling Results - Inorganic Constituents
3-16
3-4
Groundwater Sampling Results - Leachate Parameters
3-23
5-1
Baseline and Routine Parameters to be Analyzed
5-2
S30950/2
1027 li
1.0 INTRODUCTION
A Part 360 and Phase 11 Hydrogeologic Investigation was conducted at the Southold
Landfill, Town of Southold, Long Island, New York in 1991 to obtain detailed hydrogeologic
information pertaining to the landfill site and to determine if the landfill is a source of groundwater
contamination. The results of this investigation are contained in a report, entitled "Part 360 and
Phase H Hydrogeologic Investigation Report, Southold Landfill, Town of Southold, Suffolk
County, New York," dated October 1991.
As a recommendation of this report, a long-term monitoring program was proposed as a
result of the data developed from the hydrogeologic investigation, and which satisfies the
requirements of the New York State Part 360 regulations for the operation and closure of the
existing landfill, and the permitting of a new landfill adjacent to the existing landfall. This report
presents the results of the initial phase of the long-term monitoring program which was conducted
in July 1992, and a comparison to the initial 1991 sample results.
During the period July 22 through July 29, 1992, groundwater samples were collected from
14 groundwater monitoring wells installed during the Part 360/Phase H Hydrogeologic
Investigation and two monitoring wells installed by the Suffolk County Department of Health
Services (SCDHS) at the landfill site. The locations of these 16 wells are shown in Figure 1-1.
In addition to the groundwater monitoring wells at the landfill, water samples were collected
from three private water supply wells which are located downgradient from the landfill
(Figure 1-2). The groundwater and water supply samples were analyzed for the Part 360 Baseline
Parameters.
2839(3/2
1027 1-1
1
F1 C n
i - 0' -GOV ROAD
-
1,
MW -4 , \
11 �� -"� • 500.1
MW -5' �.
0
EXIST ING \IAJNING AREA \
�I �jMW-2 \ \\
S -6883t -l/
x
\ V
MW -3
68916/
i
'Al
MW -6
-no
I oZ
6\
I \ I +
\I� �T ( LAND)fIILL Afl€A / EOVERHEAD
LECTRIC
J\ l / �• LINES
MW-7WASTE OIL
_
/ 1STORAGE
', �, �;["-J \I � •1 ;\,-'- � COLLECTION
CENTER
WEIGHING
STATION
STORAGE
GARAGE
LEGEND
MW -T : v -' EXISTING BUILDING ,\
O i ON LANDFILL SITE
EXISTING FENCE LINE
SCDH8 GROUNDWATER
/+ S-69761 •
- •, MONITORING WELL
C M W -1•• PART 380/PHASE B GROUNDWATER
ROp MONITORING WELL CLUSTER
N/ SCALE IN FEET
�R 0 100 t00 300
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
mMONITORINNG WELL LOCATIONS
,J �tw FIGURE 1-1
Section 1
I I GW -51 ® I
OREGON ROAD
DIRECTORY: C:\1027
FILE NAME: PGWATER
DATE: R.A. 8/14/92
SCALE: 1=1
0 400
SCALE IN FEET
LEGEND
DESIGNATION
DESCRIPTION
------ - -AL
------_ -PRIVATE WAVER SUPPLY - -
GW -5
SAMPLING LOCATIONS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Dvirka SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
and PRIVATE WATER SUPPLY
O Bartilucci SAMPLING LOCATIONS FIGURE -z
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Secti®n 2
2.0 FIELD HWESTIGATION
2.1 Monitoring Well Sampling
The depth to groundwater and total well depth was measured in 15 of the 16 monitoring
wells comprising the long-term groundwater monitoring well network on July 22, 1992. The
sixteenth well, S-68831, was not safely accessible until a deep drainage ditch adjacent to the well
was temporarily filled by facility personnel. Well S-68831 was measured on July 28, 1992. The
measurements obtained from the wells were used to determine the groundwater level elevation and
calculate the volume of water to be purged from each well prior to sampling. Groundwater
elevations are presented in Table 2-1.
Four well volumes were purged from the monitoring wells in clusters MW -1 through
MW -7. A minimum of four field measurements for temperature, pH, specific conductance and
turbidity were obtained from the water purged from the wells. Stabilization was satisfied if three
consecutive measurements indicated that the water was representative of groundwater in the
aquifer. The measurements of the field parameters stabilized after removal of three well volumes
from wells S-68831 and S-68916.
The shallow wells in clusters MW -1 through MW -7 were purged using disposable,
dedicated polyethylene bailers and polypropylene rope. The seven deep wells in the clusters, as
well as S-68831 and S-68916, were purged using a Grundfos Rediflo 2 submersible pump. As
described below, the pump was decontaminated before use on the site and between monitoring
wells to prevent introduction of contaminants from prior use and cross contamination between
monitoring wells. Samples collected from the monitoring wells were analyzed for the Part 360
Baseline Parameters.
Field measurements of turbidity from samples from the shallow wells in clusters MW -1
through MW -7 were greater than 50 NTUs immediately after purging. Samples for metals
analysis from these wells were collected within 24 hours after purging to allow water in the well to
clear. The collection of a sample for metals analysis was also delayed for MW -4D when the
turbidity meter malfunctioned and the turbidity was visually estimated to exceed 50 NTU.
2840(3/2
1027 2-1
Table 2-1
GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS
JULY 22,1992
(measured in feet)
Depth to
Groundwater
Elevation
Groundwater
Well
(From Top of
Top of Well
Elevation
Monitoring Well
I. *
Well Casin¢)
ing MSL)
MSL)
MW -1S
52
39.65
44.38
4.73
MW-lD
152
39.48
44.39
4.91
MW -2S
27
13.63
18.15
4.52
MW -2D
85
12.72
17.23
4.51
MW -3S
55
43.91
48.50
4.59
MW -3D
125
44.06
48.63
4.57
MW -4S
73
59.54
63.60
4.06
MW -4D
150
59.63
63.76
4.13
MW -5S
77
64.15
68.44
4.29
MW -5D
136
63.64
67.89
4.25
MW -6S
56
47.89
52.50
4.61
MW -6D
145
48.01
52.59
4.58
MW -7S
50
43.40
48.07
4.67
MW -7D
125
42.35
47.03
4.68
S68916
102
48.70
53.23
4.53
S68831**
204
48.60
53.27
4.67
*Below ground surface
**Water level measured on July 28,
1992.
MSL - Mean Sea Level
i
28400/1
1027
2-2
2.2 Pump Decontamination Procedure
Decontamination of the Grundfos Rediflo 2 pump consisted of an external wash with
Alconox and a brush followed by a rinse with clean water. Decontamination of the interior of the
pump consisted of pumping approximately 30 gallons of potable water through the pump. Water
for decontamination was obtained from a public water supply source at an outside hose connection
at the rear of the Town of Southold Recreation Center located in Peconic.
2.3 Private Water Supply Sampling
Samples from private water supply wells were collected from outside hose connections at
locations GW -5, GW -6 and GW -8 (Figure 1-2). The property at location GW -7 is the subject of a
bank foreclosure and was not accessible for sampling. Samples obtained from the water supply
wells were analyzed for Part 360 Baseline Parameters.
2.4 Field Forms
Daily Field Activity Reports, Sample Information Records, Water Supply Sample
Information Records, Daily Equipment Calibration Logs and Chain of Custody forms were
prepared during the sampling program and are contained in.Appendix A.
2.5 Data Validation Results
All sample data was validated to ensure that all analyses were performed in accordance with
the 1991 NYSDEC ASP. All results were 100 percent contractually compliant. The results for
volatile organics and select metals were qualified due to Quality Control (QC) criteria falling
outside control limits; however, all data is deemed usable. Data validation summaries and data
user advisory tables can be found in Appendix B along with completed data validation forms.
284M/2
1027 2-3
Section 3
3.0 FINDINGS
3.1 Groundwater Flow Patterns
Groundwater contour maps were prepared from the groundwater elevations contained in
Table 2-1, and are presented in Figures 3-1 and 3-2.
3.1.1 Shallow Water Table
The water table elevations measured in the shallow wells ranged from 0.73 feet to 0.88 feet
lower than water table elevations measured on July 22, 1991. The water table contour map
prepared from these measurements (Figure 3-1), indicates a generally northwesterly flow of
groundwater through the site confirming the findings of the Part 360/Phase H Hydrogeologic
Investigation conducted in 1991. The groundwater gradient ranges from 5.4 x 10-5 feet of head
loss per foot of horizontal distance in the southern end of the site to 4.0 x 10-4 feet of head loss per
foot of horizontal distance in the northern end of the site. The hydraulic gradients are comparable
to those found in 1991.
3.1.2 Deep Groundwater
Water level elevations measured in the deep wells ranged from 0.56 feet to 0.9 feet lower
than water level elevations measured on July 22, 1991. Well S-68831 was not included in the
groundwater level measurements obtained in 1991. The piezornetric contour map prepared from
the July 1992 measurements (Figure 3-2) indicates a general northwesterly flow direction and
confirms the findings of the 1991 investigation. The flow gradient ranges from 1.25 x 10-4 feet of
head loss per foot of horizontal distance in the south end of the site to 3.3 x 10-4 feet of head loss
per foot of horizontal distance in the north end of the site. The average hydraulic gradient for deep
groundwater flow is 2.3 x 10-4 feet of head loss per foot of horizontal distance and confirms the
findings determined in 1991.
The vertical hydraulic gradient for each well cluster location is presented in Table 3-1. The
vertical gradient was deterrnined by calculating the difference in hydraulic head between the
shallow and deep wells and dividing this figure by the distance between the water table and the
midpoint of each deep monitoring screening interval. A slight downward gradient of 2.5x10-4 to
5.7x10-4ft/ft exists at clusters MW -3, MW -5 and MW -6. An upward gradient of 2.5x10 3 ft/ft
2841(3/3
1027 3-1
1 ^4.70
STORAGE
GARAGE
I, 4•��
I
I I 4 20
�I
II�
4.30
II /
4.40 /
I
4.50
I � � ❑ �I II
w— s
(4.73
ROAD
NORTH
o� II
I�
1
I \
4.40
i
I
4.50
I
I
I
4.60
I
�ROAO AB)
�cou�,n
LEGEND
DESIGNATION
DESCRIPTION
MW -4S
MONITORING WELL LOCATION
5.0
GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOUR
—
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION
DIRECTORY: C:\1027 0 400 800
FILE NAME: WTCMAP
DATE: R.A. 8/14/92
SCALE: 1=1
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
anirka SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
O aartilucci WATER TABLE C O NT O^U R M A P
CONSULTING ENGINEERS JULY 229 1992 FIGURE 3-1
I \\
I \\
I I
—4.20tI 1
5
4.30
4.30 I
FORMER MIMNG
I II 4.40 AREA
I ED
14.40
i
I I
4.50
�
—_------_— - �— r4.51�
Fkz� i
•4.53�--sa)
4.5
8�D 58�D
Z4—
�� 1 ACTIVE DFILL 14.57)
Z4 -- 4.60 AREA
COMPOST /
4.70
� � 1 MW -7D I
1 OVERHEAD
ELETRIC
LINES
— 4.80 4� DISPOSAL AREA - ` ---�
i ETJ
STORAGE T O
GARAGE J C ❑
4.9 I h41 W —1 U
0 (4 91
el
l�®
I � —COLLECTION — WASTE OIL
CENTER STORAGE
WEIGHING
cl
I ¢60
STATION
� ROAD
ROAD
4.90
'— 4 Ddl
DIRECTORY: C:\1027 Q 400 800
FILE NAME: 1027psur
DATE: R.A. 10/26/90
SCALE: 1=1
DESIGNER: L.V.G.
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Dvirka SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
and P®TENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAP
O Bartilucci JULY 2 2, 1992
--- LEGEND --- --- -- -
--
DESCfllf'T101 I
M01JITORING WELL LOCATION
GR_OUI lDW_A_TER _EI EVAT1011 C0P1 i0l)R
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION
uESIGhI a1I011
h1'A
FIGURE 3-2
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Table 3-1
SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
VERTICAL HYDRAULIC GRADIEbM
-.r
AT EACH WELL CLUSTER
Well
Cluster Number
MW -1
MW -2
MW -3
MW -4
MW -5
MW -6
MW -7
Difference
Between Shallow
and Deep Well
Water Level
Elevations (ft)
0.18
0.01
0.02
0.07
0.04
0.03
0.01
Vertical
Hydraulic
Gradient (M)
1.7x10-3
No Gradient2
2.5x10
7.9x10
5.7x10
3.2x10
No Gradient
Direction of Vertical
Hydraulic Gradient
Upward
Downward
Upward
Downward
Downward
1. Vertical gradient computed by dividing the difference in elevation by the distance between
the water table and the midpoint of the deep well screen.
2. The vertical gradient at these locations could not be accurately determine since the difference
in groundwater elevations were below the limit of accuracy of 0.01 ft. when measured using
hand held water level recording equipment.
28410/5
1027
3-4
and 7.9x10 4 ft/ft was present at clusters MW -1 and MW -4, respectively. The vertical gradient at
well clusters MW -2 and MW -7 could not be calculated since the difference in groundwater
elevations was 0.01 ft which is below the limit of accuracy for hand held water level recording
equipment.
The 1992 vertical gradients are lower than those measured during the 1991 round of
sampling indicating horizontal flow conditions with little or no recharge. Strong downward
4 vertical gradients of 1.4 x 10-2 ft/ft and 1.3 x 10-2 ft/ft were found to exist at well clusters MW -2
v'
and MW -7, respectively, in 1991. Slight downward gradients were found throughout the site in
the remaining wells in 1991, except for well clusters MW -3 and MW -6, where a slight upward
_1
gradient was present. This indicates that, in general, the aquifer was in a state of recharge during
i 1991. Although rainfall was greater just prior to the 1992 sampling event, the total rainfall for the
year up to July 1992 (January through July) was less than that for the same period in 1991. This
may account for the lower water level elevations in 1992 as well as the lack of recharge during this
period.
3.2 Groundwater Sampling Results
3.2.1 Organic Sampling Results
The volatile organic compounds (VOCs) detected in groundwater samples during this round
of monitoring are presented in Table 3-2. The analytical results for samples collected in
July 1991, are also included for comparison purposes. For those wells not sampled in July 1991,
(GW -5, GW -6, GW -8, S-68916 and S-68831), the most recent available analytical results are
' included for comparison.
Methylene chloride, 1,2-dichloroethane, 1,2-dichloropropane, chlorobenzene, 1,2 -dichloro-
benzene and 1,4 -dichlorobenzene were found to be present in the on-site wells during both rounds
of sampling. Of these, methylene chloride was found to exceed NYSDEC groundwater standards
of 5 ug/1 during this round of sampling. However, methylene chloride, which was found in all of
the wells sampled, excluding S-68831, is a common laboratory contaminant that was found in the
method blank, field blank and trip blank, therefore, its presence in the groundwater samples is
unlikely.
1,2-Dichloroethane, which was detected previously in wells MW -6D and S-68916 at levels
exceeding the NYSDEC standard of 5 ug/l, was found to be no longer present in any well sampled
as part of the investigation. 1,2-Dichloropropane and chlorobenzene detected above NYSDEC
standards in the July 1991 sampling round in wells MW -6D and S-68916, respectively, were either
2841 G15
1027 3-5
r
TABLE 3-2
SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC
Uuwurlmmb: Nt7TE8:
U: Analyzed for but not detected r ST: Standard
B: Compound found in blank as well as sample GV: Guidance value
----: Not established
ST": Applies to each isomer individually
:Exceeds standards/guidelines
MW1S
MW1S
I IMW10
MW10
I MW2S
MW2S
MW2D
MW2D
NYSCLASS
GA STANDARDS/1
7/25/91
17/22/92
7/25/91
17/22/92
1 7/24/91
17/23/92
17/24/91
17/28/92
1 GUIDELINES
Volatile ompounos
u
ug/
ug
1 ug I
u)
u
u
1 ug/
u i
Chlorometnane
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Bromomethane
U
U
U
U
Vinyl Chloride
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
2 ST
Chloroethane
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Methylene Chloride
L
14 B
U
11 8
U
9 8
U
2 B
5 ST
1,1-Dichloroethene
L
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
1,1-Dichloroethane
L
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
1,2-Dichloroethene (trans)
L
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 Si
Chloroform
L
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
7 ST
1,2-Dichloroethane
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Carbon Tetrachloride
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Bromodichloromethane
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
50 GV
1,2-Dichloropropane
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
L
U
L
L
U
L
U
U
5 ST
Trichloroethene
L
U
L
L
L
L
L
L
5 ST
Dibromochloromethane
L
U
L
L
L
L
L
L
50.GV
1,1,2 -Trichloroethane
L
U
L
L
L
L
L
L
5 ST
Benzene
L
U
L
L
L
L
L
0.7 ST
Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
L
U
L
L
L
U
L
L
5 ST
Tetrachloroethene
L
U
L
L
U
U
L
U
5 ST
1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane
L
U
L
L
U
U
L
U
5 ST
Toluene
L
U
L
L
U
U
L
U
5 ST
Chlorobenzene
L
U
L
L
U
3.5
L
1
5 ST
Ethylbenzene
L
U
L
L
U
U
L
U
5 ST
Xylene (total)
L
U
L
L
U
U
U
U
5 ST'
2-Chloroethylvinylether
L
U
L
L
U
U
U
U
----
Trichlorofluoromethane
L
U
L
L
U
U
U
U
5 ST
1,2 -Dichlorobenzene
L
U
L
L
U
U
U
U
4.7 ST
1,3 -Dichlorobenzene
U
U
U
U
5 ST
1,4 -Dichlorobenzene
U
4.7 ST
Bromoform
U11
I
I
I
So GV
Uuwurlmmb: Nt7TE8:
U: Analyzed for but not detected r ST: Standard
B: Compound found in blank as well as sample GV: Guidance value
----: Not established
ST": Applies to each isomer individually
:Exceeds standards/guidelines
I Chloromethane
Bromomethans
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene Chloride
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene (trans)
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Bromodichloromethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Dibromoch lorom ethane
1,1,2 -Trichloroethane
Benzene
Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,2.2 -Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Xylene (total)
2-Chloroethylvinylether
Trichlorofluoromethane
1,2 -Dichlorobenzene
1,3 -Dichlorobenzene
1,4 -Dichlorobenzene
Bromoform
TABLE 3-2 (CON -170)
SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC
MW3S MW3S I ' MW313 I MW3D
7/25/91 7/23/92 I 7/25191 1 7/28/92
ugil) I (11nilli u7701
U
U
U
u
U
U
U
5 ST
U
U
U
U
LI
u
U
U
U
7.5 B
U
5 ST
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
7 ST
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
50 GV
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
u
U
So GV
U
L
U
U
U
L
U
U
U
L
U
5 ST
U
L
U
U
U
•:.
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
U
L
U
U
U
L
U
U
U
L
U
4.7 ST
U
L
U
U
LI
L
U
U
U
L
U
GV: Guidance value
U
L
U
U
L
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
QUALIFIERS:
U: Analyzed for but not detected
B: Compound found in blank as well as sample
2.3
2.7
MW4S ! MW4S SGA STANDARD
7/26/91 7/27/92 i GUIDELINES
u
u
u
U
U
5 ST
U
U
5 ST
U
U
2 ST
U
U
5 ST
U
4.7 8
5 ST
U
U
5 ST
U
U
5 ST
U
U
5 ST
U
U
7 ST
U
U
5 ST
U
U
5 ST
U
U
5 ST
U
U
50 GV
U
U
5 ST
U
U
5 ST
U
U
5 ST
U
U
So GV
U
U
5 ST
U
U
0.7 ST
U
U
5 ST
U
U
5 ST
U
U
5 ST
U
U
5 ST
U
U
5 ST
U
U
5 ST
U
U
5 ST*
U
U
----
U
U
5 ST
U
U
4.7 ST
U
U
5 ST
U
U
4.7 ST
U
U
50 GV
NOTES:
ST: Standard
GV: Guidance value
----: Not established
ST*: Applies to each isomer individually
:. ?; ..::Exceeds standardsiguidelines
i
TABLE 3-2 (CONTD)
SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC
U: Analyzed for but not detected ST. Standard
B: Compound found in blank as well as sample GV: Guidance value
---: Not established
ST Applies to each isomer individually
:Exceeds standards/guidelines
1
I
NYSDEC CLASS
MW413
MW4D
MWSS
MWSS
MW5D
MWSD
MW6S
MW68
IGA STANDARDS/1
,7/26/91
17/27/92
7/25/91
17/27/92
7/25/91
1 7/27/92
7/24/91
17/23/92
1 GUIDELINES
1 Volatile ompoundsug/1
1 ug/l
E
727-7
i (ug/1)
77U57-1
ug/l)
1 ug/I)
i (UgJT
Chloromethane
L
LU
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Bromomethane
L
U
U
U
U
L
U
U
5 ST
Vinyl Chloride
L
L
U
U''.
f?U
U
2 ST
Chloroethane
U
5 ST
Methylene Chloride
L
4.1 B
4.5 B
U
4 E
U
8.6 B
5 ST
1,1-Dichloroethene
L
U
U
U
u
U
U
U
5 ST
1,1-Dichloroethane
L
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
1,2-Dichloroethene (trans)
L
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Chloroform
L
2.2
U
U
U
U
U
U
7 ST
1,2-Dichloroethane
L
1
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
L
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Carbon Tetrachloride
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Bromodichloromethane
L
U
U
U
U
2
U
U
50 GV
1,2-Dichloropropane
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
L
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Trichloroethene
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
U
5 ST
Dibromochloromethane
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
U
50 GV
1,1,2 -Trichloroethane
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
U
5 ST
Benzene
L
L
L
L<;
'`±°L
U
0.7 ST
Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
U
5 ST
Tetrachloroethene
L
L
L
L
U
L
L
U
5 ST
1,1;2,2 -Tetrachloroethane
L
L
L
L
U
L
L
U
5 ST
Toluene
L
L
L
L
U
L
L
U
5 ST
Chlorobenzene
L
L
L
L
U
1.3
L
2.2
5 ST
Ethylbenzene
L
L
L
L
U
L
L
U
5 ST
Xylene (total)
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
U
5 ST,
2-Chloroethylvinylether
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
U
----
Trichlorofluoromethane
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
U
5 ST
1,2 -Dichlorobenzene
L
L
L
L
L
L
1
1.5
4.7 ST
1,3 -Dichlorobenzene
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
U
5 ST
1,4 -Dichlorobenzene
1
2.5
4.7 ST
Bromoform
U
So GV
®UALJFIERS:
NnTER-
U: Analyzed for but not detected ST. Standard
B: Compound found in blank as well as sample GV: Guidance value
---: Not established
ST Applies to each isomer individually
:Exceeds standards/guidelines
1
TABLE 3-2 (CONT'D)
SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC
UUAU1-1t:rty: NOTES:
U: Analyzed for but not detected ST. Standard
B: Compound found in blank as well as sample GV: Guidance value
----: Not established
ST** Applles to each isomer individually
standards/guidelines
MW6D
MW6D
I MW7S
MW7S
MW7D
MW7D
NYSDEC CLASS -1
GA STANDARDS/
7/25/91
7/24/92
1 7/25/91
7/22192
1 7/26/91
7/22/92
j GUIDELINES
Volatile ompounds
j (Ug/0
u
u
(Ug/0
i u
u
u
Chloromethane
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Bromomethane
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Vinyl Chloride
U
U
U
U
U
U
2 ST
Chloroethane
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Methylene Chloride
U
12 B
U
17 B
U
15 B
5 ST
1,1-Dichloroethene
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
1, 1 -Dichloroethane
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 S
1,2-Dichloroethene (trans)
U28'
UU
U
U
5 ST
Chloroform
U
U
U
U
U
L1
7 ST
1,2-Dichloroethane
1U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
U
U
U
U
U
L
5 ST
Carbon Tetrachloride
U
U
U
L
U
L
5 ST
Bromodichloromethane
U
U
U
L
U
L
50 GV
1,2-DichloropropaneL
U
L
U
L
5 ST
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
U
L
U
L
U
L
5 ST
Trichloroethene
U
I.
U
L
U
U
5 ST
Dibromochloromethane
U
L
U
L
U
U
50 GV
1,1,2 -Trichloroethane
U
L
U
L
U
U
5 ST
Benzene
U
L
U
L
U
U
0.7 ST
Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
U
L
U
L
U
L
5 ST
Tetrachloroethene
U
L
U
L
U
L
5 ST
1,1,2,2-Tetracnloroethane
U
L
U
L
U
L
5 ST
Toluene
U
L
U
L
U
L
5 ST
Chlorobenzene
U
L
U
L
U
L
5 ST
Ethyibenzene
U
L
U
L
U
U
5 ST
Xylene (total)
U
L
U
L
U
U
5 ST*
2-Chlorcethylvinyiether
U
L
U
L
U
U
----
Trichlorofluoromethane
U
L
U
L
U
U
5 ST
1,2 -Dichlorobenzene
1
2.6
1
L
U
U
4.7 ST
1,3 -Dichlorobenzene
U
L
U
U
U
5 ST
1,4 -Dichlorobenzene
U
L
1
U
U
4.7 ST
Bromoform
U
UT
I U
U
50 GV
UUAU1-1t:rty: NOTES:
U: Analyzed for but not detected ST. Standard
B: Compound found in blank as well as sample GV: Guidance value
----: Not established
ST** Applles to each isomer individually
standards/guidelines
TABLE 3-2 (CONT -D)
SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANICS
UUAUFIEFiS: NOTES:
U: Analyzed for but not detected ST. Standard
B: Compound found in blank as well as sample GV: Guidance value
----: Not established
ST': Applies to each isomer individually
:Exceeds standards/guidelines
GW -8
PW -001
(GW -8)
GW -6
PW -002
(GW -6)
GW -5
PW -003
(GW - 5)
NYSDEC CLASS I
GA STANDARDS/1
12/4/90
1 7/24/92
112/4/90
1 7/24/92
1 1214/90
1 7/24/92
GUIDELINES
Volatile ompounas
WI(Ug/0
(ug/1)
(Ug/0
i u
u
(u
Chloromethane
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Bromomethane
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Vinyl Chloride
U
U
U
U
U
U
2 ST
Chloroethane
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Methylene Chloride
U
10 8
U
10 B
U
12 B
5 ST
1, 1 -Dichloroethene
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
1,1-Dichloroethane
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
1,2-01chloroethene (trans)
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Chloroform
U
U
U
U
U
U
7 ST
1,2-Dichloroethane
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Carbon Tetrachloride
U
U
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Bromodichloromethane
U
U
U
U
U
U
50 GV
1,2-Dichloropropane
U
L
U
L
U
U
5 ST
cis- 1,3- Dichloropropene
U
L
U
L
U
U
5 ST
Trichloroethene
U
L
U
L
U
U
5 ST
Dibromochloromethane
U
L
U
L
U
U
50 GV
1,1,2 -Trichloroethane
U
L
U
L
U
U
5 ST
Benzene
U
L
U
L
U
U
0.7 ST
Trans-l,3-Dlchloropropene
U
L
U
L
U
U
5 ST
Tetrachloroethene
U
L
U
L
U
U
5 ST
1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane
U
L
U
L
U
U
5 ST
Toluene
U
L
U
L
U
U
5 ST
Chlorobenzene
U
L
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Ethylbenzene
U
L
U
U
U
U
.5. ST
Xylene (total)
U
L
U
U
U
U
5 ST'
2-Chloroethylvinylether
U
L
U
U
U
U
----
Trichlorofluoromethane
U
L
U
U
U
U
5 ST
1,2 -Dichlorobenzene
U
U
U
U
4.7 ST
1,3 -Dichlorobenzene
U
U
U
U
5 ST
1,4 -Dichlorobenzene
U
U
U
U
4.7 ST
Bromoform
U1
ul
I U1
Ul
5o GV
UUAUFIEFiS: NOTES:
U: Analyzed for but not detected ST. Standard
B: Compound found in blank as well as sample GV: Guidance value
----: Not established
ST': Applies to each isomer individually
:Exceeds standards/guidelines
TABLE 3-2 (CONT -0)
SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANICS
NYSOEC CLASSGA
S-68916
S-68916
S-68831
S-68831
STANDARDS/
12/4/90
7129/92
7/25/89
7/29/92
GUIDELINES
Volatile ompoun s
I u
ug/
ug/
u
u
Chloromethane
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Bromomethane
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Vinyl Chloride
U
U
U
U
2 ST
Chloroethane
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Methylene Chloride
U
0.3 J
U
U
5 ST
1,1-01chloroethene
U
U
U
U
5 ST
1,1-Dichloroethane
U
U
U
U
5 ST
1,2-Dichloroethene (trans)
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Chloroform
U
U
U
U
7 ST
1,2-Dichloroethane
U
U
U
U
5 ST
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Carbon Tetrachloride
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Bromodichloromethane
U
3.5
U
U
50 GV
1,2-01chloropropane
U
U
U
5 ST
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Trichloroethene
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Dibromochloromethane
U
U
U
U
50 GV
1,1,2 -Trichloroethane
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Benzene
U
U
U
U
0.7 ST
Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Tetrachloroethene
U
U
U
U
5 ST
1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Toluene
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Chlorobenzene
:24>:
2
U
U
5 ST
Ethylbenzene
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Xylene (total)
U
U
U
U
5 ST'
2-Chloroethylvinylether
U
U
U
U
----
Trichlorofluoromethane
U
U
U
U
5 ST
1,2 -Dichlorobenzene
U
U
U
U
4.7 ST
1,3 -Dichlorobenzene
U
U
U
U
5 ST
1,4 -Dichlorobenzene
U
U
U
U
4.7 ST
Bromoform
U
U
U1
U 1
50 GV
QUALIFIERS: NOTES:
U: Analyzed for but not detected ST: Standard
B: Compound found in blank as well as sample GV: Guidance value
----: Not established
ST': Applies to each isomer individually
:Exceeds standards/guidelines
_ l
TABLE 3-2 (CONT -D)
SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING RESULTS
VOLATILE ORGANICS
NYSDEC CLASS
TS 7/25
TRIP BLANK
FB01
FIELD BLANK
GA STANDARDS/
7/25/91
7/28/92
7/15/91
7/24/92
GUIDELINES
Volatile mpounds(Ug/0
u l
u
(ug/1)
-
Chlorometnane
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Bromomethane
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Vinyl Chloride
U
U
U
U
2 ST
Chloroethane
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Methylene Chloride
U
6.8 B
U
8.7 8
5 ST
1,1-Dichloroethens
U
U
U
U
5 ST
1,1-Dichloroethans
U
U
U
U
5 ST
1,2-Oichloroethene (trans)
U
U
U
U
5 ST
'
Chloroform
U
U
U
U
7 ST
1,2-Dichloroethane
U
U
U
U
5 ST
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Carbon Tetrachloride
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Bromodichloromethane
U
U
U
U
50 GV
1,2-Dichloropropane
U
U
U
U
5 ST
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Trichloroethene
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Dibromochloromethane
U
U
U
U
50 GV
1,1,2 -Trichloroethane
U
U
U
U
5 ST
Benzene
U
L
U
U
0.7 ST
Trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene
U
L
U
U
5 ST
Tetrachloroethene
U
L
U
U
5 ST
1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane
U
L
U
U
5 ST
Toluene
U
L
U
U
5 ST
Chlorobenzene
U
L
U
U
5 ST
Ethylbenzene
U
L
U
U
5 ST
Xylene (total)
U
L
U
U
5 ST'
2-Chloroethylvinylether
U
L
U
U
----
Trichlorofluoromethane
U
L
U
U
5 ST
1,2 -Dichlorobenzene
1
U
U
4.7 ST
1,3 -Dichlorobenzene
U
U
U
5 ST
1,4 -Dichlorobenzene
1
U
U
4.7 ST
Bromotorm
ul
ul
50 GV
QUAUFlERS: NOTES:
U: Analyzed for but not detected ST, Standard
B: Compound found in blank as well as s GV: Guidance value
', ----: Not established
' ST': Applies to each Isomer individually
:::Exceeds Standards/guidelines
not detected during this round or were present at levels well below the NYSDEC standards.
Figure 3-3 shows the organic compounds found to exceed the NYSDEC groundwater standards.
Additional volatile organic compounds detected on-site that were not present during the
previous round include benzene, bromodichloromethane, chloroform, vinyl chloride and
1,2-dichloroethene. Of these, only vinyl chloride, benzene and 1,2-dichloroethene were found to
slightly contravene the NYSDEC Class GA groundwater standards of 2 ug/1, 5 ug/1 and 0.7 ug/1,
respectively.
No VOCs (exclusive of methylene chloride) were detected in the three private wells
sampled.
Benzene, which was not detected during the previous round in any on-site well was present
in MW -2S (1.2 ug/1), MW -3S (1.1 ug/1) and MW -5D (1.5 ug/1) at levels slightly exceeding the
NYSDEC standard of 0.7 ug/l. The reason for the detection of benzene at these wells is unclear
and will be confirmed during future rounds of groundwater sampling. 1,2-Dichloroethene was
detected in well MW -6D at a level of 28 ug/l. This compound was not detected during any
previous groundwater sampling round. Since 1,2-dichloroethene was not present in any previous
sampling events, including the soil samples collected from within the lagoon area upgradient of
MW -6D, the presence of this compound cannot be confirmed at this time.
The presence of vinyl chloride in monitoring well MW -5D at a concentration of 17 ug/l is
considered anomalous since it was undetected during previous sampling rounds and is not present
in any wells located upgradient of MW -5D. If this compound was indicative of a plume
emanating from the landfill,, it should be present in well clusters MW -2 and MW -3. A possible
source of VOCs in MW -5D could be the commercial properties located upgradient of this well and
immediately adjacent to the landfill along Cox Lane. These properties include a commercial
landscaping company, a cement company and a company which handles refrigeration units.
r Therefore, the presence of vinyl chloride at MW -5D will need to be confirmed in subsequent
sampling events.
r� 3.2.2 Inorganic Samples Results
The inorganic constituents detected in groundwater samples are listed in Table 3-3. Iron,
manganese, magnesium and sodium were the metals found to exceed New York State
28410/5
1027 3-13
COMPOUND CO
—1.2 DCE
BENZENE
■ -- — -- ---
e
2
ON
EP
D
1 Y
ON
EP
D
D
D
ION
.EP
ID
ID
ID
DIRECTORY:
C: \1027
FILE NAME:
ORGST-01
DATE:
R.A. 10/28/92
SCALE:
1=1
DESIGNER:
LV.G.
0 400
SCALE IN FEET
NOTE
ALL RESULTS IN ug/I
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
Dvi ka ORGANIC COMPOUNDS EXCEEDING CLASS GA
andidlO Bartilucci GROUNDWATER STANDARDS IN GROUNDWATER—
CONSULTING ENGINEERS JULY 1992 FIGURE 3-3
LEGEND
DESIGNATION
DESCRIPTION
•
MW -6
MONITORING WELL AND SAMPLING LOCATIONS
•
GW -5
PRIVATE SUPPLr WELL SAtdPLIHG LOCATIONS
1,2 DCE
1.2 DICHLOROETHENE TRANS
VC
VINYL CHLORIDE
BENZENE
BENZENE
ND
NOT DETECTED
*
PRESENT ABOVE STANDARDS
J
ESTIMATED VALUE BELOW DETECTION LIMIT
NOTE
ALL RESULTS IN ug/I
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
Dvi ka ORGANIC COMPOUNDS EXCEEDING CLASS GA
andidlO Bartilucci GROUNDWATER STANDARDS IN GROUNDWATER—
CONSULTING ENGINEERS JULY 1992 FIGURE 3-3
standards/guidelines for Class GA groundwater in a number of samples collected during the 1991
and 1992 rounds of sampling. Cyanide was found during the 1992 sampling program at a
concentration of 110 ug/l at monitoring well MW -21) which contravenes the NYSDEC standard of
100 ug/l. However, this detection of cyanide may be due to matrix interference and will need to
be confirmed. Figure 3-4 illustrates those constituents exceeding NYSDEC groundwater standards
and includes leachate parameters discussed in Section 3.2.3 of this report.
The results obtained during this investigation indicate that the distribution and concentration
of metals within the groundwater has, in general, remained consistent with the results obtained
during the previous (1991) round of sampling with a few exceptions, which show either increasing
or decreasing concentrations of certain inorganic parameters at discrete locations when compared
to the 1991 sampling results. Water quality at downgradient well cluster MW -2 is essentially the
same; however, the concentration of iron has decreased in well MW -21) (244 ug/1) to below the
NYSDEC standard (300 ug/1). The concentration of iron at MW -4S, however, has increased from
79 ug/1 to 636 ug/l. The concentration of sodium in well MW -5S (8,720 ug/1) fell below the
NYSDEC standard of 20,000 ug/1. There has also been significant decreases of iron and
manganese concentrations at monitoring well -5D, although magnesium and sodium levels
have increased. The data also indicates a significant increase in the level of iron in well MW -6D
from 758 ug/l to 18,400 ug/1. Iron has decreased sharply in wells MW -7S and MW -7D to levels
indicative of background conditions. It is interesting to note that the 1991 round of sampling
showed the highest levels of iron at the MW -7 well cluster. Manganese, which exceeded the
NYSDEC standard of 300 ug/l in well -7S and MW -71) during the first round of sampling was
found in concentrations of 136 ug/l and 34.1 ug/1, respectively. The most significant anomaly is
the presence of cyanide exceeding the NYSDEC standard of 100 ug/1 in monitoring well MW -2D
(110 ug/1). As mentioned previously, MW -21) has shown a marked decrease in the levels of iron
while other parameters remained unchanged. Therefore, the presence of cyanide in well MW -21)
may be an isolated occurrence that will be confirmed in future rounds of groundwater sampling.
Sampling results for the private wells are also included in Table 3-3 and are compared to
results obtained on December 4, 1990, which were obtained by the United States Environmental
Protection Agency. The metals found to contravene standards during this sampling phase were
284ia/5
1027 3-15
TABLE 3-3
SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING
INORGANICS
NYSDEC CLASS
MW1S
MW1S
MW1D MW1D
1
MW2S
MW2S
MW21) MW21) GA STANDARDS/
1
7/25/91
7/22/92
7/25/91 7/22/92
7/24/91
7/23/92
7/24/91 7/28/92 GUIDELINES
Constituent (ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1) (ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1)
Aluminum 501
1190
612 822
1490
173
146 B 92.7 ----
Antimony U
U
U U
U
U
U U 3 GV
Arsenic U
U
U U
U
U
U U 25 ST
Barium 68 B
51.98
30 B 30.1 B
198 B
180 B
264 219 1000 ST
Beryllium U
U
U U
U
U
U U 3 GV
Cadmium U
U
U U
U
U
U U 10 ST
Calcium 11500
6810
22800 15900
7620
153000
106000 112000 ----
Chromium U
11.7
U U
U
8.58
U U 50 ST
Cobalt U
U
U U
U
13.68
32 B 19.1 B ----
Copper U
10.8 B
12 B 11.8 B
21 B
13.68
U U 200 ST
Iron :-.4 .:
<28 1;
8s
s85ti
; ::3� t >
`i?80: 244 300 ST
Lead U
3.2
13 8.1
4
U
U 3.3 25 ST
Magnesium 7740
5260
9220 6910
22000
23300
:7.1400. 35000 GV
Manganese 62(D>
32T
243 224
4flQf);. _
a93A>
::9990> `: ij: 300 ST
Mercury U
U
U 0.25
U
0.33
U 0.34 2 ST
Nickel U
33.4 B
U U
U
18B
79 82.2 ----
Potassium 23800
1960
2090 B U
93500
80000
130000 118000 ----
Selenium U
U
U U
U
U
U U 10 ST
Silver U
U
U U
U
U
U U 50 ST
Sodium >:#1:61:
:
1630 14600
: TOQQ; :
743�R0Q2pQ89QpQ:
20000 ST
Thallium U
U
U U
U
U
U U 4 GV
Vanadium U
U
U U
U
U
U U ----
Zinc 16 B
33.8
36 35.3
17 B
14.813
17 B 99.7 300 ST
Cyanide U
U
U U
U
U
U 1>1I}: 100 ST
QUALIFIERS: NOTES:
U: Analyzed for but not detected. ST: Standard
B: Value less than contract required GV: Guidance value
limits but greater than instrument ----: Not established
detection limits. : Exceeds standard/guidelines
N/A: Not analyzed.
am
TABLE 3-3 (CONT -D)
SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING RESULTS
INORGANICS
NYSDEC CLASS
MW3S
MW3S
MW3D
1
MW31)
MW4S
MW4S
MW41)
MW4D
GA STANDARDS/
7/25/91
7/23/92
7/25/91
7/28/92
7/26/91
7/28/92
7/26/91
7/28/92
GUIDELINES
Constituent
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
W/O
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
Aluminum
410
348
196 B
269
U
253
300
170
----
Antimony
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
3 GV
Arsenic
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
25 ST
Barium
282
210
133 B
125 B
U
22.4 B
155 B
133 B
1000 ST
Beryllium
U
U
U
U
U
1.2
U
U
3 GV
Cadmium
U
U
U
U
U
5
U
U
10 ST
Calcium
118000
121000
125000
140000
9080
12700
133000
136000
----
Chromium
U
8.58
U
U
U
6.9 B
U
U
50 ST
Cobalt
U
11.98
77
84.5
U
U
U
U
----
Copper
U
11.813
U
U
U
U
U
U
200 ST
Iron:2t:1:Q
539iD :::
TQW
79 B
Sa:Q
311
300 ST
Lead
U
U
U
5
U
U
5
U
25 ST
Magnesium
32800
27100
WOW:
:04oft
1950 B
2910 B
60.3W.:
-WOW
35000 GV
Manganese
70 f :
2060Q
235Qf) : °:
'.1l t :
40
40.2
:54+' 3' .:
1 t1.
300 ST
Mercury
U
0.4
U
0.75
U
0.56
U
0.88
2 ST
Nickel
U
23.9B
36 B
32.2 B
U
U
U
31.6 B
----
Potassium
72500
47700
84000
86600
3330 B
3050 B
53800
44300
----
Selenium
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
10 ST
Silver
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
50 ST
Sodium
2400 B
4720 8ZI(;tQt)p:.
iQQQ
20000 ST
Thallium
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
4 GV
Vanadium
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
----
Zinc
U
14.48
19 B
58.7
U
12.2 B
U
46.9
300 ST
Cyanide
U
30
U
40
U
U
U
30
100 ST
QUALIFIERS: _
NOTES:
U: Analyzed for but not detected.
ST: Standard
B: Value less than contract required
GV: Guidance value
limits but greater than
instrument
----: Not established
detection limits.
: Exceeds standard/guidelines
N/A: Not analyzed.
TABLE 3-3 (CONT -D)
SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING RESULTS
INORGANICS
NYSDEC CLASS
MW5S
MW5S
MW51)
1
MW51)
MW6S
MW6S
MW6D
MW61)
GA STANDARDS/
7/25/91
7/28/92
7/25/91
7/27/92
7/24/91
7/24/92
7/24/91
7/24/92
GUIDELINES
Constituent
(ug/I)
(ug/1)
(ug/1) I
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
Aluminum
460
537
319
198
754
255
U
56.9
----
Antimony
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
3 GV
Arsenic
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
25 ST
Barium
U
14.7 B
58 B
160 B
40 B
123 B
134 B
101 B
1000 ST
Beryllium
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
3 GV
Cadmium
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
10 ST
Calcium
U
1490 B
51100
83600
42300
61200
80400
78000
----
Chromium
U
U
U
U
U
14.2
U
7.6B
50 ST
Cbbalt
U
U
U
U
U
14 B
U
13.68
----
Copper
U
U
U
22.2 B
U
10B
U
U
200 ST
Iron
15:
1.8400'
300 ST
Lead
5
3.8
8
5.4
16
U
U
U
25 ST
Magnesium
2160 B
2200 B
28700
74pp:
11100
15400
393AQ8(l4ii:
35000 GV
Manganese
110
122
63.2
1 ;
.: :3f7Q.
I'94QQ.
"400
300 ST
Mercury
U
U
U
0.30
U
0.69
U
U
2 ST
Nickel
U
18.5 B
U
24 B
U
35 B
51
32.913
----
Potassium
U
U
377
3060 B
42500
37000
44800
38100
----
Selenium
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
10 ST
Silver
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
50 ST
Sodium
$1
8720
13.1000:
65 .00:
J0.5 :
11!#OQQ
09144:.
`. 20000 ST
Thallium
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
4 GV
Vanadium
U
U
U
U
U
9.2 B
U
U
----
Zinc
U
12.1 B
49
78.9
20
21.2
14 B
23.6
300 ST
Cyanide
U
U
U
10
U
U
U
10
100 ST
QUALIFIERS:
NOTES:
U: Analyzed for but not detected.
ST: Standard
B. Value less than contract required
GV: Guidance value
limits but greater than
instrument
----: Not established
detection limits.
: Exceeds standard/guidelines
N/A: Not analyzed.
TABLE 3-3 (CONT -D)
SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
GROUNDWATER
SAMPLING RESULTS
INORGANICS
PW001
PWO02
PWO03
NYSDEC CLASS
MW7S
MW7S
MW7D
MW71)
GW -8
(GW -8)
GW -6
(GW -6)
GW -5
(GW -5)
GA STANDARDS/
7/25/91
7/23/92
7/26/91
7/22/92
12/4/90
7/24/92
12/4/90
7/24/92
12/4/90
7/24/92
GUIDELINES
Constituent
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
Aluminum
664
238
8860
258
N/A
63
N/A
32.6
N/A
32.6
----
Antimony
U
U
U
U
N/A
U
N/A
U
N/A
U
3 GV
Arsenic
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
25 ST
Barium
72 B
51.9 B
110B
38.3 B
U
20.5 B
U
43.7 B
U
51.9 B
1000 ST
Beryllium
U
U
U
U
N/A
U
N/A
U
N/A
U
3 GV
Cadmium
U
U
U
6.3
U
U
U
U
U
5
10 ST
Calcium
15600
14300
10900
9320
U
5270
36500
58900
56600
37000
----
Chromium
U
U
21
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
50 ST
Cobalt
U
U
U
U
N/A
U
N/A
U
N/A
U
----
Copper
U
U
22 B
U
U
107
284
-268156
83.2
200 ST
Iron
2��8Q6P:
49
<i��lOp:: .::
55:•
U
828)::
280
U:.
250
U
300 ST
Lead
U
U
16
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
25 ST
Magnesium
3490 B
3090 B
6270
4680 B
U
5320
9140
15100
12400
11300
35000 GV
Manganese
-45 -
136
'0:
34.1
U
203
U
7 B
U
7.2 B
300 ST
Mercury
U
U
U
0.34
6
0.39
0.7
0.36
0.8
0.24
2 ST
Nickel
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
17 B
U
U
----
Potassium
5310
2800
3920 B
U
U
4080 B
U
7460
U
4320
----
Selenium
U
U
U
U
N/A
U
N/A
U
N/A
U
10 ST
Silver
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
50 ST
Sodium
16600
14200
$$fjOQOQI:
..
..::.....
8670
9870
8730
11900
,%:1a
8860
20000 ST
Thallium
U
U
U
U
N/A
U
N/A
U
:.
N/A
U
4 GV
Vanadium
U
U
31 B
U
N/A
10.1 B
N/A
6.2 B
N/A
U
----
Zinc
U
19.2
67
33.4
221
35.3
38
50.2
-405.
32.1
300 ST
Cyanide
U
U
U
U
N/A
U
N/A
U
N/A
U
100 ST
QUALIFIERS:
NOTES:
U: Analyzed for but not detected.
ST: Standard
B: Value less than contract
required
GV: Guidance value
limits but greater than
instrument
----: Not established
detection limits.
: Exceeds standard/guidelines
N/A: Not analyzed.
TABLE 3-3 (CONT -D)
SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING RESULTS
INORGANICS
NYSDEC CLASS
S68916
S68916
S68931
S68931
FB0724
GA STANDARDS/
12/4/90
7/29/92
12/4/90
7/29/92
7/24/92
GUIDELINES
Constituent
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
Aluminum
N/A
153
N/A
99.4
32.6
----
Antimony
N/A
U
N/A
U
U
3 GV
Arsenic
U
U
N/A
U
U
25 ST
Barium
U
106 B
NIA
21.4 B
31.4 B
1000 ST
Beryllium
N/A
U
N/A
U
U
3 GV
Cadmium
U
U
N/A
6
U
10 ST
Calcium
6830
58400
15000
17800
26400
----
Chromium
20
U
N/A
U
U
50 ST
Cobalt
N/A
15 B
N/A
U
U
----
Copper
31
18.6 B
N/A
U
U
200 ST
Iron
30
Als:
U
300 ST
Lead
:f4>
U
N/A
6.7
U
25 ST
Magnesium
�t4
4Q701?
2100
2050 B
8400
35000 GV
Manganese
O....
60
83.5
8.78
300 ST
Mercury
U
N/A
U
U
2 ST
Nickel
U
U
NIA
U
U
----
Potassium
167000
118000
2500
U
U
----
Selenium
N/A
U
N/A
U
U
10 ST
Silver
U
U
N/A
U
U
50 ST
Sodium
€$QQ.R.: ::
.:.:.::....:
-.1
::....:
3c�340
:..:..:.:
10800
20000 ST
Thallium
.
N/A
U
N/A
U
U
4 GV
Vanadium
N/A
U
N/A
U
U
----
Zinc
20
28.8
N/A
96.1
91.1
300 ST
Cyanide
N/A
40
N/A
U
U
100 ST
QUALIFIERS:
NOTES:
U: Analyzed for but not detected.
ST: Standard
B: Value less than contract
required
GV: Guidance value
limits but greater than instrument
----: Not established
detection limits.
: Exceeds standard/guidelines
N/A: Not analyzed.
CUKUN
U ut)I
U.UJO
0:02
IID
CHROMIUI.1
0.03
NO
PHENOL
DIRECTORY: C: \1027 0 400
FILE NAME: INORGSTI
DATE: R.A. 10/30/92
SCALE: 1=1 SCALE IN FEET
DESIGNER: S.P.B.
dbDvirka
and INORGANIC
BartNluccEERB GROUNDWATER
IT OTE
ALL RESULTS IN mg/I
4TION
DEEP
.616 +
131 •
Q-010--
1.02213
ND
ND _
Z65 +
ND
ND
).02 •
ATION
DEEP
1.6 »
15.4
148 »
0.040
-ND-
24.0 ND_24.0
-1-48--
297 +
0.696
ND
;ATION
DEEP
1.535 +
4.688
0.034
70.5 +
ND
NO
ND
-.9-8
80
0.04
0.01
NO
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
CONSTITUENTS EXCEEDING CLASS GA
STANDARDS/GUIDELINES IN GROUNDWATER
FIGURE 3-4
LEGEND
DESIGNATION
DESCRIPTION
0
MW -6
MONITORING WELL AND SAMPLING LOCATIONS
GW -:i
PRIVATE SUPPLY WELL SAMPLING LOCATIONS
Fe
IRON _
M
MAGNESIUM
_
Mn
MANGANESE
No
SODIUM
Cn
CYANIDE
Cu
COPPER
AMMOHIA
AMMONIA NITROGEN
NITRATE
NITRATE
CHLORIDE
CHLORIDE
_
BORON
BORON
CHROMIUM
HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM
PHENOL
PHENOL
ND
NOT DETECTED
B I
LESS THEN CRDL BUT GREATER THEN IDL.
*I
PRESENT ABOVE STANDARDS GUIDELINES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
CONSTITUENTS EXCEEDING CLASS GA
STANDARDS/GUIDELINES IN GROUNDWATER
FIGURE 3-4
iron and copper. Iron was found in private well PW001 (GW -8) at a concentration of 8,210 ug/l.
Previous results did not indicate the presence of this metal. Copper was found in private well
PW002 (GW -6) at a concentration of 268 ug/1 and was detected previously at a similar
concentration of 284 ug/l. Sodium and zinc were detected above NYSDEC standards in well
PW003 (GW -5) during previous rounds of sampling but were well below the standard during this
round. These elevated metal levels may be attributable to piping in the residences and are not
related to contaminants detected at the landfill.
MORTMM . ..`.II .q.'
Leachate parameters found to contravene NYSDEC Class GA groundwater standards as part
of this investigation include ammonia, chloride and phenol. These constituents were also found
during the July 1991 sampling round. In addition, hexavalent chromium and boron were found in
isolated samples during this part of the investigation. The sample results are presented in
Table 3-4. Leachate parameters exceeding NYSDEC groundwater standards were included in
Figure 3-4.
Phenol, found to contravene NYSDEC standards in all wells sampled in July 1991 was
undetected in wells MW -1S, MW -ID, MW -5S, MW -6D, MW -7S, MW -7D and 5-68831. Phenol
was found in the remaining wells at concentrations which do not exceed the New York State
Department of Health (NYSDOH) drinking water standard of 0.050 mg/l. This indicates a
possible trend toward decreasing concentrations of phenol throughout the site.
Ammonia was found to exceed NYSDEC Class GA groundwater standards of 2 mg/1 at
monitoring wells MW -2S, MW -2D, MW -3S, MW -3D, MW -4D, MW -6S and MW -6D. The
results are consistent with previous findings. Ammonia was undetected in downgradient wells
MW -4S, MW -5S and MW -5D, indicating an attenuation of the plume as it moves off-site.
Chloride, although not toxic, is a good leachate indicator since its presence corresponds closely
with areas of elevated metal concentrations, as well as elevated ammonia concentrations. Chloride
concentrations are generally unchanged since the last sampling round, although the concentration
increased from 115 mg/I to 265 mg/1 in downgradient well MW -5D. Although this may indicate a
strengthening of the plume downgradient of the landfill in the area of this well, decreasing
concentrations of iron and manganese make this unclear.
28410/9
1027 3-22
TABLE 3-4
SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING
LEACHATE PARAMETERS
NYSDEC CLASS
MW1S
MW1S
MW11)
MW1D
MW2S
I MW2S
MW213
MW2D
MW3S
MW3S
MW3D
MW3D
MW4S
MW4S
GA STANDARDS/
7/25/91
7/22/92
7/25/91 7/22/9
7/24/9117/23/92
7/24/91
7/28/92
7/25/91
7/23/92
7/25/91 7/28/92
7/26/91
7/28/92
GUIDELINES
Color, Pt/Co.
10
<10
10
20
50
150
75
40
75
40
50
20
10
<10
----
Turbidity, N.T.U.
255
3760
26
60
244
400
17.5
8
1820
1050
75
15
700
620
----
Results in mg/I:
Alkalinity
13
9
46
40
689
932
192
790
682
666
707
624
6
16
----
Ammonia Nitrogen
0.17
U
0.09
U
$7'..
t3$ Q;
96 .:$
3 ..•::
2 i.9[t<.
U
<0.05
2 ST
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
5
U
U
U
3
8
U
40
6
6
U
21
U
U
----
Chloride
26
34
24
19
133
216
33
$;
28�
239
21'4.
25
10
250 ST
Chemical Oxygen Demand
7
83
U
16
189
188
143
129
170
193
92
74
104
51
----
Hardness
26
232
100
148
390
408
620
720
530
452
640
684
32
64
----
Hexavalent Chromium
N/A
0.03
N/A
0.02
N/A
U
N/A
U
NIA
U
N/A
U
N/A
U
0.05 ST
Nitrate
0.15
1.05
1.69
2.04
0.34
0.10
U
12.7
0.89
0.67
U
1.48
0.64
2.14
10 ST
Phenol
f),A: ;
U
O.Q/4
U
020:<
::QQ9::
Q,020:::QQ::
O:AA
U
0.001 ST
Sulfate
20
22
56
41
77
85
71
63
56
28
78
88
25
23
250 ST
Total Dissolved Solids
N/A
186
N/A
216
N/A
1400
N/A
1514
N/A
1135
N/A
1205
N/A
99
----
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
0.40
1.18
2.69
1.99
100
74.3
90
60.2
46.1
29.7
30.4
27.4
1.18
2.14
----
Total Organic Carbon
9.1
3.19
7.4
2.1
2.25
55.6
253
40.4
233
36.5
192
19
4
2.4
----
Boron
U
0.067
U
0.058
U
0.797
0.938
DQ2!¢:
0.614
0.692
0.626
0.696
U
0.143
1 ST
QUALIFIERS:
NOTES:
U: Analyzed but not detected
ST: Standard
N/A: Not
analyzed
GV. Guidance value
----: Not established.
: Value exceeds allowable standard/guidance
value.
TABLE 3-4 (CONT -D)
SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING
LEACHATE PARAMETERS
NYSDEC CLASS
MW413
MW4D
I MW5S
MW5S
MW51)
MW513
MW6S
MW6S
MW613
MW61)
MW7S-
MW7S
MW713
MW713
GA STANDARDS/
7/26/91
7/28/92
7/25/91
7/28/92
7/25/91
7/27/92
7/24/91
7/24/92
7/24/91
7/24/92
7/25/91
7/23/92
7/26/91
7/22/92
GUIDELINES
Color, Pt/Co.
125
20
15
20
15
40
35
40
50
10
15
40
250
<10
----
Turbidity, N.T.U.
24
32
495
210
13.5
16
113
180
3.8
280
154
620
516
10
----
Results in mg/I:
Alkalinity
546
522
8
12
230
426
267
320
401
434
46
33
60
38
----
Ammonia Nitrogen
4
' :#<t:
U
U
U
U
0.15
0.25
0.10
U
2 ST
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
U
7
U
U
353
U
U
3
5
8
U
7
U
U
----
Chloride
2$Q:
;? $:.
14
11
115
2%
42
49
150
160
13
18
74
80
250 ST
Chemical Oxygen Demand
93
74
24
16
492
65
41
79
41
60
U
60
32
20
----
Hardness
650
618
16
28
290
586
160
228
396
480
78
228
50
80
----
Hexavalent Chromium
N/A
U
N/A
U
N/A
U
N/A
U
N/A
0.02
N/A
0.06
N/A
0.01
0.05 ST
Nitrate
0.91
0.71
U
0.04
0.21
U
0.13
U
0.05
U
1.39
0.75
14:
9.80
10 ST
Phenol
Q A3Q::'...
A Q2Q '
U
Q:Q3Q :
:.
Q;Q2:.
40 Q ::
;Q Q1;
0;
U
Q.f12U..
U
OA>tA>`
U
0.001 ST
Sulfate
153
179
11
12
70
78
128
121
157
156
26
51
49
29
250 ST
Total Dissolved Solids
N/A
1260
NIA
82
N/A
1076
N/A
635
N/A
981
N/A
173
N/A
358
----
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
37.8
35.3
0.23
0.07
1.18
0.59
13.15
10.1
21.6
19.7
1.56
1.00
12.7
9.52
----
Total Organic Carbon
135
1.3
2.2
26.8
149
1.3
92.6
20.4
78.6
9.9
48.6
3.19
12.9
1.73
----
Boron
0.617
U
U
0.534
0.221
U
0.159
0.252
0.393
0.326
U
0.099
U
0.04
1 ST
QUALIFIERS:
NOTES:
U: Analyzed but not
detected
ST: Standard
N/A: Not
Analyzed.
GV: Guidance value
----: Not established.
: Value exceeds allowable standard/guidance value.
TABLE 3-4 (CONT°D)
SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING
LEACHATE PARAMETERS
QUALIFIERS:
U: Analyzed but not detected
N/A: Not analyzed.
NOTES:
ST: Standard
GV: Guidance value
----: Not established.
Value exceeds allowable standard/guidance va
PW001
(GW -8)
PWO02
(GW -6)
PWO03
(GW -5)
S-68916
S-68831
FIELD BLK
NYSDEC CLASS
GA STANDARDS/
GUIDELINES
7/24/92 7/24/92 7/24/92 7/29/92 7/29/92 7/24/92
Color, Pt/Co.
20
<10
<10
80
20
<10
----
Turbidity, N.T.U.
153
0.27
0.30
53
9.2
0.50
----
Results in mg/I:
Alkalinity -
36
10
14
718
122
31
----
Ammonia Nitrogen
0.59
U
0.06;
0.67
U
2 ST
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
6
U
U
107
8
U
----
Chloride
14
48
31
212
13
14
250 ST
Chemical Oxygen Demand
16
24
16
177
33
U
----
Hardness
220
264
140
402
64
84
----
Hexavalent Chromium
U
U
U
U
€U9:
U
0.05 ST
Nitrate
1.32
`iQ;
8.49
1.12
U
5.31
10 ST
Phenol
U
U
U
b.,U
U
0.001 ST
Sulfate
16
92
75
77
7
47
250 ST
Total Dissolved Solids
108
477
337
1007
158
U
----
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
2.15
8.30
7.73
93.9
0.82
5.47
----
Total Organic Carbon
U
U
U
25
5.4
U
----
Boron
0.087 1
1 0.104
0.163
0.590
0.077
0.007
1 ST
QUALIFIERS:
U: Analyzed but not detected
N/A: Not analyzed.
NOTES:
ST: Standard
GV: Guidance value
----: Not established.
Value exceeds allowable standard/guidance va
Hexavalent chromium was found in well MW -7S at a level of 0.06 mg/l and in well S-68831
at a concentration of 0.09 mg/l, which slightly exceeds the NYSDEC standard of 0.05 mg/l.
Hexavalent chromium was not analyzed in previous rounds of sampling. Whether these are
isolated occurrences will be determined in subsequent groundwater sampling events. Boron
slightly exceeded the NYSDEC standard of 1 mg/1 in monitoring well MW -2D, where it was
found at a concentration of 1.024 mg/l. This is consistent with the previous sampling event where
it was found at a concentration of 0.938 mg/l. Boron was undetected in downgradient wells
MW -4D and MW -5D, but was detected in well MW -5S at a concentration of 0.534 mg/l. Nitrate
was found to slightly exceed the NYSDEC standard of 10 mg/1 in private well PWO02 (GW -6),
where it was detected at a concentration of 10.5 mg/l. Since nitrate was not found to be present at
elevated levels in any wells located upgradient of this location, the presence of nitrate in the
sample cannot be attributed to the landfill.
28410/5
1027 3-26
Section 4
4.0 CONCLUSIONS
In general, the analytical results obtained for the initial phase of the long-term monitoring
program conducted in July 1992, are consistent with those collected one year earlier in July 1991
and presented in the Part 360 and Phase H Hydrogeologic Report dated October 1991. The
presence of vinyl chloride, benzene and 1,2 dichloroethene at levels slightly exceeding the
NYSDEC Class GA groundwater standards will be addressed further as part of -the long-term
monitoring program. Further rounds of groundwater sampling are necessary to identify any
possible long-term trends which cannot be established based on two sets of analytical data. VOCs
were not detected in any downgradient private water supply wells sampled as part of this
investigation.
Aside from the anomalous presence of cyanide in well MW -21), the general distribution and
concentration of metals throughout the site has not changed significantly when compared to the
July 1991 sampling event. Cyanide in well MW -21), if present, will be confirmed in future rounds
of groundwater sampling. Metals detected above the NYSDEC Class GA groundwater standards
in private wells sampled as part of the 1992 investigation include iron, copper and sodium.
Copper was not found in elevated concentrations in the landfill monitoring wells. Therefore, the
elevated levels of metals in the private water supply well samples are not attributable to the
landfill. The source of copper in the private water supply samples could be from copper piping.
The leachate parameter sample results obtained as part of this investigation, were generally
similar to those obtained during the July 1991 sampling round. However, concentrations of phenol
have shown a marked decrease in concentrations throughout the site.
Hexavalent chromium, which was not analyzed for in the previous round, was detected at
levels slightly exceeding the NYSDEC standard of 0.05 mg/l in wells MW -7S (0.06 mg/1) and
S-68831 (0.09 mg/1). Whether these are isolated occurrences will be determined in subsequent
sampling events. The only routine parameter to exceed NYSDEC standards in the private wells
was nitrate, which was found in well GW -6 at a concentration of 10.5 mg/1. On-site nitrate levels
were significantly below NYSDEC standards, indicating no impact from the landfill. The likely
source of this nitrate contamination could be fertilizers or on-site sewage disposal.
310960/3
1027 4®1
In summary, the groundwater quality at the Southold Landfill has not been significantly
impacted by the landfill and has not changed significantly, and there has been no apparent impact
on private water supply wells downgradient from the landfill.
M60/3
1027 4-2
Secti®n 5
The results of the 1992 Groundwater Quality Assessment Report generally confirm the
findings of the Part 360/Phase H Hydrogeologic Report, as well as previous investigations. The
findings indicate that a weak plume is emanating from the landfill but is limited in that the plume
has not caused any observable impacts to nearby downgradient water quality in off-site private
water supply wells. The 16 on-site monitoring wells, in addition to the downgradient private water
wells, provide an adequate and comprehensive monitoring network. Therefore, continued,
long-term sampling of the monitoring network is recommended to fulfill the Part 360 landfill
operation, closure and expansion requirements.
The Part 360 requirements call for all environmental monitoring points not previously
sampled to be analyzed for two rounds of sampling. The first round of sampling as part of the
Part 360/Phase III Hydrogeologic Investigation was performed for baseline parameters. The
sampling program, which is the subject of this report, comprises the first round of sampling as part
of the long-term monitoring plan, and was also performed for baseline parameters. The existing
data base for these two rounds of baseline sampling is considered sufficient so that the next round
of sampling will be performed for select routine parameters as described in Section 6.0 of the
Part 360/Phase II Hydrogeologic Report. Since the 1992 round of sampling showed elevated
levels of contaminants not previously detected, it is recommended that the list of selected routine
parameters be modified to include those compounds not previously detected at levels exceeding
NYSDEC groundwater standards. Further modifications may be made for this list based on future
groundwater sampling results.
It is recommended that the sampling frequency of the long-term monitoring parameters be.
semiannually, with one sampling event being for baseline parameters and one for modified routine
parameters on an alternating basis. All subsequent rounds of sampling are primarily designed to
confirm the results of previous rounds of sampling, as well as to establish trends related to
groundwater quality. Sampling parameters for both the July 1992 round of sampling and the
recommended modified routine parameter list for subsequent rounds of sampling are included in
Table 5-1.
31310/2
1027 5-1
Table 5-1
SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
GROUNDWATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT
PROGRAM
BASELINE AND ROUTINE PARAMETERS
TO BE ANALYZED
AS PART OF OPERATION AND CLOSURE MONITORING PLAN
Baseline
Modified Routine
Parameters to be Analy (1) (My 1992)*
ganm= 1993)(2)
I. Field Parameters
Static Water Levels
X
X
Specific Conductance
X
X
Temperature
X
X
Floaters or Sinkers(3)
X
pH
X
X
Eh
X
X
Field Observations(4)
X
X
2. Leachate Indicators
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN)
X
Ammonia
X
X
Nitrate
X
X
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
X
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)
X
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
X
Sulfate
X
Alkalinity
X
Phenols
X
O
Chloride
X
X
Total Hardness (as CaCO3)
X
Turbidity
X
X
Color
X
Boron
X
O
I Metals
Potassium
X
Sodium
X
X
Iron
X
X
Manganese
X
X
Magnesium
X
X
Lead
X
' - - Cadmium
X
Aluminum
X
Calcium
X
31310/2
1027 5-2
Table 5-1
(1) All samples must be whole and unfiltered, except as otherwise specified by NYSDEC.
(2) Modified list subject to change based on future sampling results.
(3) Any floaters or sinkers found must be analyzed separately for baseline parameters.
(4) Any unusual conditions (colors, odors, surface sheens, etc.) noticed during well
development, purging or sampling must be reported.
(5) Volatile organics are to be analyzed using EPA Methods 601/602.
X Targeted parameter as per the October 1991 Hydrogeologic Investigation Report.
O Additional targeted parameter based on data obtained from the July 1992 round of
groundwater sampling.
*Not all parameters in Part 373-2, Appendix 33 are analyzed under TCL+30.
31310/2
1027 5-3
SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
GROUNDWATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM
BASELINE AND
ROUTINE PARAMEMERS TO BE ANALYZED
AS PART OF OPERATION AND CLOSURE MONITORING PLAN
Baseline Modified Routine
Parameters to be AnalyzW(l)
iJ y 1992)* (J=,= 1993)(2)
Toxic Metals
Antimony
X
Arsenic
X
Beryllium
X
Barium
X
Cadmium
X
Chromium (total)
X
Chromium - Hexavalent
O
Copper
X O
Lead
X
Mercury
X
Nickel
X
Selenium
X
Silver
X
Thallium
X
Zinc
X
Cyanide
X O
4. Volatile Organics(5)
X X
(1) All samples must be whole and unfiltered, except as otherwise specified by NYSDEC.
(2) Modified list subject to change based on future sampling results.
(3) Any floaters or sinkers found must be analyzed separately for baseline parameters.
(4) Any unusual conditions (colors, odors, surface sheens, etc.) noticed during well
development, purging or sampling must be reported.
(5) Volatile organics are to be analyzed using EPA Methods 601/602.
X Targeted parameter as per the October 1991 Hydrogeologic Investigation Report.
O Additional targeted parameter based on data obtained from the July 1992 round of
groundwater sampling.
*Not all parameters in Part 373-2, Appendix 33 are analyzed under TCL+30.
31310/2
1027 5-3
V xipueddd
3095011
1027
J
J 3099®/1
1027
®VIRKA
AND
ND
BARMUCC,
DAJILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT
ReporT Number: Project Number: i L Date:
Field Log Book Page Number:
Project: S ��r- OQD L,,�
Address: ei4 06 uS /V
e Weather: (AM) `� J W I Rainfall: (AM) Inches
(PM): s J "✓u / (PM) Inches
Temperature: (AM) -,r OF Wind Speed: (AM) 0S MPH Wind Direction: ( AM) LfA�L—
(PM) OF (PM) MPH TM)
Site Condition: G-467
Arrival
Departure
Personnel On Site: N=
L=
L4
/�
rLa2M� ,� Ili V
3
zi
®� C,"A/ L)
[ 041-7
�e
�Ri4v� Sv oss,� �a
I'
Subcontractor Work Cornrnencernent: (AM) —
(PM)
Subcontractor Work ComVietion: (AM)
(PM)
dbOV1RKA
AND
BARnLUCCI DATE. V S S
DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT
General work performed today by D&B: L.4Cs fz Dv.OM,*,4/
i.� �� LO ,.r.. � / z � � %/4 %'r20r� S , 7d S14%y� ))Ee4 4.1
�)z ✓' C
L
Lis /-Ax h R C/0 B rc %� cKti•7 �� �F1�✓1/L�%/� i2d _ l�hN a L / a c �/
kh-
List specific inspection(s) performed and results (include problems and corrective actions):
List type and location of tests performed and results (include equipment used and monitoring results):
Verbal comments received from subcontractor (include construction and testing problems, and
recommendataio ting action):
IDMI DJ ;G`` 7
0'V1RKA
AND ND
®ART LUCC, DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT
'
Report Number: Project Number: � ®'?7
Date: luL.
Field Log Book Page Number:
Project: s
J�
:address: � J G N-0 � U k X
Weather: (AM) +' � `y �- Lo Rainfall:
(AM) Inches
(PM): S ��Nu
(PM) Inches
Temperature: (AM) L�° F Wind Speed: (AM) IZAA MPH
'
Wind Diiecdon: (AM)
(PM) F (PND MPH
(PM)
i
Site Condition:
`
Arrival Departure
Personnel On Site:
via
Subcontractor Work Commencement: (
(PM)
Subcontractor Work Completion: (AM)
(PM)
K�
dEa
DVIRKA
AND
BARiILUCCi
DATE:
General work performed today by D&B: �J,4%,fe 4Rv4 LS W A t_.L 1-A'
UU KLCz i`1219 uA-c,> t,✓ ly'ti L4— C L �s:.r� e / Ti�.4 �� ,� ] � ,) l✓t c L S G �' 9r
List speck inspection(s) performed and results (include problems and corrective actions):
�i�y,v7 hlATe3 A S�/I c.< � ��� �: �L•ic? � ��•-� �% w / S
W hi.2lC ,y0i LLgeTa,�j —.Q,r; �J �c l / /'-',D /7(4/ /3&WvSd
0 I
VIA,
t�
7-23 -gam
r�
List type and location of tests performed and results (include equipment used and monitoring results):
Verbal comments received from subcontractor (include construction and testing problems, and
recommendati ting action):
DB-DFAR
dbDVIRKA
AND
BARTILUCCI
DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT
Report Number: Project Number: I0 Date:
Field Log Book Page Number:
Project:u
Address: - CJ; c4-yav:r A)
Weather: (AM)fyMLA`- ;— - S�a��/x Rainfall: (AM) S X425 Inches
(PM): 2 (PM) ¢ v Inches
Temperature: (AM) °F Wind Speed: (AM) _ NIPH Wind Direction: (AM)
(PM) �-� OF (PM) MPH (PM)
Site Condition: �'� L --w(? ✓11'7
Arrival Departure
Personnel On Site: Name Time Time
T" A4 9r C40
' Subcontractor Work Commencement:
^� Subcontractor Work Completion:
DB-DFAR
(AK �—
(PM)
(AM) `�` (PM) -�
dbcDVIRKA
AND
BARMUCCi
DATE. 7 - --� 3 - � ;
DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT
General work performed today by D&B:�i'-�o��.,�� wV47'u
y-< /'70 �IA 1 a ` d.1 .a( L4..),t LiC
//TSAR
i..
List specific inspection(s) performed and results (include problems and corrective actions):
c�CoI
)N1 W 47_ a� 7Ae�9 e �C �%1I�L LyCf%4,� �i�V� / -7
N1 s�; �s U,,� �.� �'-� � � S �"I �✓— � S �-a,,� �`i c� is
tAfh 2 V n C V'.1 s
2A n A, L% a �.4� u,v7 w.¢T,r� �►e��r /�2 �"lliiaC.S ,�,v� 6yk wed
List type and location of tests performed and results (include equipment used and monitoring results):
Verbal comments received from subcontractor (include construction and testing problems, and
recommendationsfresulting action):
DB-DFAR
bDVIRKA
BARTILUCCI AND
I
DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT
Report Number: `� Project Number: CO2 :2 Date: 6/1- -�
Field Log Book Page Number: r
Project: �O V i 4vL—o
Address: �� i GI -GOC, 4 /V L�
Weather: (AM) Sv-J�� Rainfall: (AM) Inches
(PM): g.J • (PM) Inches
0
Temperature: (AM) of Wind Speed: (AM) � MPH Wind Direction: (AM)
(M) F (PM) MPH (PM)
Site Condition: C�2
Arrival Departure
Personnel On Site: /Name Time Time
Lis_ �.��y''i
Ami
Subcontractor Work Commencement: (AM) _ (PM) '
Subcontractor Work Completion: (AM) (PM)
DB-DFAR
dbc®V1RKA
AND
BARMLUCCI DATE:
N,, . I 1 r
General work performed today by D&B: � ,�v,,�� W.4%9/1 5
Sd2�S l v d
�StS �'o C.C.Oci�.7 �/-�� T. �/r 1V Fog
�� Co.vi1�� fit v,✓,�F�S ���, F�r,•� �ve.,�
List specific inspection(s) performed and results (include problems and corrective actions):
LL« L s Tv `_
sV-����
a4MJ I wai®Q - iAme -; byAAr ?oti 44rA 50,4,0cl•s �C'41
f} F1 A Q /� SNC w9S CV L-L.FL1.oii FAI17 7.0 J G�.�DF�S �, /-7o
' C �j
List type and location of tests performed and results (include equipment used and monitoring results):
Verbal comments received from subcontractor (include construction and testing problems, and
recommendations/resulting action):
•
DVIRKA
dbAND
BARTILUCCI
DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT
Report Number: Project Number: /Via : Date: U L.
Field Log Book Page Number:
Project: SO
Address:
Weather: (AM) - N&A (14 S' Rainfall: (AM) Inches
'
(PM): AvaI\.(PM) Inches
Temperature: (AM) 0 °F Wind Speed: (AM) MPH Wind Direction: (AM)
PM
() 'F (PM) V10V MPH (PM)
Site Condition:
Arrival Departure
Personnel On Site: Name filiation Time Time
Subcontractor Worm Commencement: (AM)
Subcontractor Work Completion:
DB-DFAR
(PM)
(AK (PM)
bBARTO VIRKA
ILUCCI
AND
DATE:
/ / e
DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT
General work p/erfor,m�ed today by D&B: CoArj'j'V']k�,�y�
List specific inspections) performed and results (include problems and corrective actions):
'4/ L/L /-"L.) 5--s ilZ. )f9l" C /D
Co
List type and location of tests performed and results (include equipment used and monitoring results):
Verbal comments received frmn subcontractor (include construction and testing problems, and
recommendation*ivsulting action):
Reviewed by:
0
bD VIRKA
BARTILUCCI AND DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT
Report Number: Project Number: '� Date:
Field Log Book Page Number:
Project:
V i-) I--, L
Address: ktl
Weather: (AM) �i Rainfall: (AM) Inches
(PM): (PM)
Inches
Temperature: (AM) �2 °F
(PM) ��-- °F
Site Condition:
Wind Speed: (AM) MPH Wind Direction: (AM)
(PNO (PM) �.
Personnel On Site: NameAffiliation
Arrival Departure
U= Time
,1�n
—C%
�oE><AA /�
30 3 '� D
Subcontractor Wodc Commencement: (AM) TM)
Subcontractor Work Completion: (AM) TM) -------
DB-DFAR
Ajl�, ®V1RKA
qLa
AND
BARi1LUCCi DATE:
DALLY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT
General work performed today by D&B: 6AC
.rr v
C.0 L
li'i ] / /L��ir7 � /moi /i � .. `9 is r �� 1 � � / •
List specific inspection(s) performed and results (include problems and corrective actions):
List tyPe and location of tests performed • • i• • • • •
S
boDVIRKA
AND
BARMUCCI
I
DAILY FIELD ACTIVITY REPORT
Report Number: Project Number: Z0 2 :1 Date:
Field Log Book Page Number: 3
Project: 5,0,J �Q h IQs c (—
Address:
Address: - c ±QG,ji
Weather: (AM) Rainfall: (AM) inches
(PM): ✓A,1^/; (PM) inches
Temperature: (AM) OF wind Speed: (AM) — MPH Wind Direction: (AM) �—
TM) °F (PMO MPH (PM)
Site Condition: 22&>
Arrival Departure
Personnel On Site: lime Time
-- Subcontractor Work Commencement: (AM) TM)
Subcontractor Work Completion: (AM) (PM)
jll� OVIRKA
ULCI)AND
BARTILUCCI
DATE: L,
1 1 1 0.
,41
General work performed today by D&B:L ' 4,o
3 i� S
List speck inspection(s) performed and results (include problems and corrective actions):
List type . locationand results (include equipment used and monitoring results):
309513/1
1027
. zA",
'O'AL ANAL r'•CAi SEav�CES apa • SAFE cyw,ar tiME'vr
`i,/�1A/ n test envy ron ment .,.
v a�
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Page / of�_
SHIP TO Nytest Environmental Inc REPORT TO Client NameIle k;'T t` Ep.�
60 Seaview Blvd Address_ DC7 r1 'L1 E-
Port Washington, NY 11050
15161 625-5500 Phone
Attn "/1 I t,� ) ,�� Attn. �'�� T–I; //1-)—A-%�`7-4-:
---FProject N.o-
Pr ect Name
Date Shipped
Carrier /;/,C- -
Sampler iSignature)
Analytical Protocol
Air Bill No
Cooler No
Sample
I.D
Date/Time
Sampled
Sample
Description
No. Of
Con-
tainers
ANALYSIS REQUESTED
✓-/,A
n
-rK I p 3L 41J
-
-
!aC C
Rish�y,by (Signature)
u
qu'- ��
Oat@ / Time
4
11,431
Ree U. By (Signature)
Oats ! Time
PrinirN___ame
/
c -T- /A 5,40,r- AA
Pant Name
Relinquished by (Signature)
Oats / Time
Redd. by (Signaturc)
Date / Time
Print Name
Print Name
Relinquished by ISignature)
Oat@ / Time
Received for Laboratory by ISignature)
Oats / Time
Pant Name
Print Name
Special Instructions/Comments D-6 0)n I c'/1 !c L,,j 47/CO. C7'( f�C,��1�Z a7�/4
Client Retains Yellow Copy Only
4A0 F '0 'A, ANAI "ICAI SEQVICES AOQ A $AGE ENVA(,NME"��
A ej ntest env nmentaI r.0
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
�-
Page—of-
SHIP
age ofSHIP TO Nytest Environmental Inc REPORT TO Client Name `
60 Seav ew Blvd Address `
Port Washington, NY 11050
15161625.5500 Phone — '•
Attn t Attn.
Project No Project Name
Sampler (SLanaturaa_-Analytical Protocol
Date Shipped
Air•Bill No
Carrier
Cooler No
Sample
D.
Date/Time
Sampled
Sample
Description
No. Of
Con-
tainers
ANALYSIS REQUESTED
o
IS 62r t.
IT
Releaga.sned by (S.gMR
.yam • � � �_: 7 ! '�
Oat• / Time
Rec d. By (Signature)
Date / Time
Pant Name ®
Pant Name
Relinquished by IS.gnature)
oat* / Time
Rec d. by(S. gnawre)
Date/ rur»
Pant Name
Pant Nana
Relinquished by Mgnatural
Date ! Time
Received for Laboratory by (Signature)
Date / Time
Print Name
Print Name
Special I nstructions/Comments
I
Client Retains Yellow Copy Only
• envir.0 rA1 ANAL Ir1CAL SEQVICES =CA A SAFE E4 v,ACNMENr
n test
zJ =ii y al r'C
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
_ Page of
SHIP TO Nytest Environmental Inc. REPORT TO ClientName
60 Seav ew Blvd Address - — -
Port Washington, NY 11050 1
(516) 625-5500
Attn _f — t
Phone
Attn.
Project No
Project Name _
Date Shipped
Carrier
$ampler (Signature)
Analytical Protocol
Air Bill No
Cooler No
Sample
1.0
Date/Time
Sampled
Sample
Description
No. Of
tamers
ANALYSIS REQUESTED
Y!
�/
A
7
17
Z L7
Z
R�m metl be ISignaturel ��'
'7' �+
Date Time
u�
Ree d. 8v (Signature)
Date ! Time
PLInj warnif �
=-z ' , I
Print Name
ReGnquiehao by IS.gnaturef -
Date Time
Rec d. bV (Signature)
Date ! Time
Print Name
Print Name
Refincimisned by ISignatural
Date ! Time
Received for Laboratory by (Signature)
Date ! Time
Print Name
Print Name
Special I nstructions/Comments
r
•
Client Retains Yellow Copy Only
IIIW
• 'OTAL ANAL enCAL SERVICES ;,JR A SA:E ENV,R(GN1IENr
n test environment
y al
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
SHIP TO Nytest Environmentar Mc REPORT TO
60 Seaview Blvd
Port Washington, NY 11050
(516) 6?5 5500
Attn -r,
Page I of
Client Name
Address-
�� t f
Phone tr `vt '.y ;,
Project No. _
Project Name
rt L
Date Shipped
e.
Carrier
Samplef (Signature)
Analytical Protocol
Air Bill No
Cooler No
Sample
I D
�t — �'�— ,.
Date/Time
Sampled
~;. f 13SI
Sample
Description
�
No Of
Con-
tainers
�
ANALYSIS REQUESTED
.I��SE� I�• � �-r f< <, n�� r-�;c
��r .".�- - �.
e
135
;�-
...r
�. �� . �-:r. � -1-�� �� ►1�1� . ;�:
X03
r
-
��
7A
log{
Relinquisned by 1Signaturel -
eta r rime
r
Fix d. 9y (Signature)
Dan I Time
Print Name
Pant Name
Relinquished by ISignature)
Date / rime
Rec d. by (Signature)
Date ! rime
Print Name
Print Name
Relinquished by (Signature)
Date r Time
Received for Laboratory by (Signature)
Dan / Time
Print Name
Print Name
Special Instructions/Comments p
7CY - tn'r�=—
v
J717an-ao4iiA,14l:Z
Client Retains Yellow Copy Only
•� 'Orel a,vat rrrCAC SERVICES;00 a SAFE
environment cy�ra(,ro,wEnr
Am n test
y al
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Page of
SHIP TO Nytest Envtronmen al Inc. REPORT TO Client Name.-
60
ame• 60 Seavfew Blvd Addres i '' =
Port Washington, NY 11050
1516) 625.5500 Phon%•o
e y "a,�� r
Attn.
RC 9 6 /.CJ 7 7) F i j
Pro ect No.
�-
P olect Name
D�?]tu� � �A A)b F/ 11
Date hipped
Carrier
Sart}pl�S�gnaturel
i ✓fit' C�Lc�
Analytical Protocol
Air Bill No
Cooler No.
Sample
I D
Date/Time
Sampled
Sample
Description
Co -
tamers
ANALYSIS REQUESTED
SA L),J :P,4,q y'y7 :F QRS
M
1
RaLwau's v tSignature)
�Tfs^'
ite%%% / TTTim`e
§ ),�+y}�
Rec U. By (Signature)
Date / T me
I' /
Print Name
R*linquisned by tS.gnature)
Date / Time
Ree d by tSignature)
nate / Time
Print Name
Print Name
Relinqursned by (Signature)
Oate / Time
Received for Laboratory by IS.gnature)
s
Oat* I Time
Print Name
Pant Name
Special Instructions/Comments
Client Retains Yellow Copy Only
rr rA1 AN ,rICAL SERVICES %OR A SAFE ENVIAC-NMENr
A"jn fest environ
�w
y mentalnc
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
SHIP TO Nytest Environmental Inc REPORT TO
60 Seaview Blvd
Port Washington, NY 11050
(516) 625-5500
i
Attn i2-- ' ;• r 14J
Page I/ of�
Client Namer.�� K� •1= f`�,C+(1-r–? / (fin 1
Address CO F ("x—
Phone
Attn.
Project.No_ —
`1 7
Project Name
SGtJZ
Date Shipped
Carrier
Sampler (Signature) Analytical Protocol
7)
Air Bill No
Cooler No
Sample
I D.
Date/Time
Sampled
Sample
Description
No. Of
Con-
tainers
ANALYSIS REQUESTED
Rehne d b� 4gnature)
--
Pr( t /
Date ! Time
0 Qtd-0�
/Time
Rec d. BY (Signature)
m
Date / Tie
Print Name
Relmtiuisned by I ignaturel
ate /
Rec'd. by (Signaturel
Date / Time
Print Name
Print Name
R@linpuisned by (Signature)
Oat@ ! Time
Rece fpl �r A" (Signature)
oG�
Date ! Time
^�
Print Name
P
Print Name
Sco -rr wiiS X
Special I nstructions/Comments
Client Retains Yellow Copy Only
30950/1
1027
hoDVIRKA
AND SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD I3A121IL1fCCI
SITE �0yi 1A0 L-;) 4--qze/ /-"/ L - L-
/ SAMPLE CREW&) f1�/Z+ /f 0f',VF,,1J��
SAMPLE LOCATION/WELLNO. 6
FIELD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER S (� // DATE
TIME /-0 4z0 WEATHER TEMPERATURE J,S y�
SAMPLE TYPE:
GROUNDWATER
SURFACE WATTIUSIMEAM
SOIL
SEDIIdENT
WELL INFORMATION (fall out for groundwater samples):
AIR
OTHER (Describe, i.e., septage,
leachate)
DEPTH TO WATER 4 �- 2 MEASUREMENT METHOD ��4,fllwL
DOYM
OF WELL / 0 3 • L MEASUREMENT METHOD k—IJ /A !/if
VOLUME REMOVED /00 6 LLLyti S REMOVAL METHOD
FIELD TEST RESULTS:
COLOR a �"P pHy. �— 5 ODOR
TEMPERATURE (PK/k. r ' � SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (umhosidn) 0
OTHER (OVA, Methane meter. etc.) /0 / � 11^0
CONSTITUENTS SAWL D. aA'r,4- Z -1,11A
r��
WELL. CASING VOLUMES
GAIIPT 1.1/4" a 0.077 2" = 0.16 3" = 0.37 4" 0.63
1-vr a 0.10 2.1/2" s 0.24 3-1/2" a 030 6" a 1.46
SIR
D VTR KA
0 AND SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD
BARTMUCCI /
S PIE S'o—,�EL G, a ,✓1,C c� L SAMPLE CREW O /'
SAMPLE LOCATION/WELLNO. G 3 /
FIELD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER DATE
TngE WEATHER S TEMPERATURE 7s v
SAMPLE TYPE: /
GROUNDWATER ✓/ SEDIMENT
SURFACE WA
Bei
WELL INFORMATION (fill out for groundwater samples):
AIR
OTHER (Describe, i.e.. septage,
leachate)
DEPTH TO WATER 7 ZS , � MEASUREMENT ME HOD W AT A- � ✓X L—�� i Cq )�j C
DEPTH OF WELL 0 ® MEASUREMENT METHOD W -A 4e Ih v,
VOLUME REMOVED 3 1 J 9t a LLo,6& REMOVAL METHOD V &, a.$
1a
COLOR a, PH � / � ODOR
T MWrERATURE con /7. ;� Q, spE imc CONDUCTANCE (umhw/an) a ' L
OTHER (OVA, Methane meter, etc.) 2 , ;L' I A'r —[ y
:,-sAl ! ols
WILL CASWG VOLUMES
GALfFT 1-V4" ■ 0.077 2" s 0.14 3" s 0J7 4" s 0.65
1-112" s 0.19 2-1/2" a 0.24 3•V2" s SM f" s 1.46
WEI
bBARTDVIRKA
lLUCCI
AND SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD l
S ITE 'r i� Z /� nJ ��–L SAADLE CREW
SAMPLE LOCATION/WELLNO.
FIELD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER %1 W —C� DATE I C!
-rte¢ �' WEATHER �rJ ,(/,v l TEMPERATURE
SAMPLE TYPE:
GROUNDWATER
SURFACE WATER/STREAM
SOIL
SEDII4ENT
WELL INFORMATION (fill out for groundwater samples):
AIR
OTHER (Describe, i.e., septage,
leachate)
DEPTH TO WATER 39 G S MEASUREMENT METHOD U% -m LL UA
DEPTH OF WELL �3 . vZ MEASUREMENTMETHOD L✓/�•C,%'tet
VOLUME REMOVED L(.0vS REMOVAL METHOD
FIII..D TEST RESULTS:
COLOR Sad al tiJ pH 47 :2 �2 ODOR
TEMPERATURE,fffrS. SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (tunhos/an)
OTHER (OVA, Methane meter, etc.) 7 � ag ka (J
CONSITIVENTS SAMPLED: 3 � S L/
WM,L CASING VOLUMES
GAL/FT 1-1/4" : 0.079 2" = 0.16 3" = 0.37 4" = 0.63
1-1/2" : 0.10 2-1/2" = 0.24 3.1/2" a 030 f" s 1.46
bD VIRKA
BARTILUCCI AND SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD
SITE > D Uf1 SAMPLE CREW �F✓ G
SAMPLE LOCATION/WEL.LNO. r
FIELD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER (5 LLi DATE
TDAE I WEATHER �✓titin TEMPERATURE - v
SAMPLE TYPE:
GROUNDWATER
SURFACE WA
SOIL
U"//
WELL INFORMATION (fill out for groundwater samples):
AIR
OTHER R (Describe, i.e.. septage,
leachate)
DEPTH TO WATER L b MEASUREMENT METHOD kJh l49.
DEPTH OF WELL / MEASUREMENT METHOD hL—& 4,4ue L
VOLUME REMOVED G gLLp-✓S REMOVAL METHOD, `-' l dA1;;VV-S 40/LF D
FIELD TEST RESULTS:
i
• s' i J pH ODOR
TEMPERATURE (°F) /� - ® C- SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (amboakm) 21 R -7
OTHER (OVA. Methane meter, etc.)
REMARKS:
WNL CASING VOL LM S
GALJPT 1-1/4" = 0.077 2" a 0.16 3" = 031 4" = 0.45
1-1/2" : 0.16 2-1/2" a 0.24 3.1/2" a 0.50 4" a 1.44
SIR
DVIRKA
AND SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD
O BARTILUCCI
S TTE
SAMPLE CREWC-14f&2�15O/A�r�,41L
SAMPLE LOCATION/WELLNO.
FIELD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER /l'J L(J (�t� DATE
TII,fE WEATHER l�Al A/ TEMPERATURE S v
SAMPLE TYPE:
GROUNDWATER
L//
SEDIMENT
SURFACE WATTAISTREAM AIR
SOIL
WELL INFORMATION (fill out for groundwater samples):
OTHER (Describe, i.e.. septage,
leachate)
DEPTH TO WATER 3 . MEASUREMENT METHOD 4D 1, h v4 L
ncv>tT nz 'CLrCT T �.41 , MRAQTTRRMRW ML'TNOD A4-7'40?` 1511,4 (
VOLUME REMOVED D . D Ca Llo,A REMOVAL METHOD / J�t *iC
FIELD TEST RESULTS:
COLOR 1 Jew A) pH !� • �9
Ov
Te"ERArmpi�'t, a 2 SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (umhos/an)
OTHER (OVA, Methane meter, etc.) Af U
coNmTnmNTs sAmPLED:
REMARKS: 7 9,
SIR
L
ODOR
WELL CASING VOLiJNM
GAIJff 1-1/4" a 0.077 2" = 0.10 3" = OJ7 4" a 0.63
1-U2" = 0.10 2-U2" = 0.24 3.1/2" a OJO f" a 1.40
dbDVIRKA
BARTILUCCI AND SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD
Ql
SITE J,9 Ute L d7 l�1 tJl, LL SAMPLE CREW�Vl�
SAMPLE LOCATION/WELLNO.
FIELD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER M(A) DATE
TIME //3D WEATHER S TEMPERATURE 0
SAMPLE TYPE:
GROUNDWATER
SURFACE WA
SOIL
SEDIMENT
WELL, INFORMATION (fill out for groundwater samples):
AIR
OTHER (Describe, i.e., septage,
leachate)
DEPTH TO WATER MEASUREMENT METHOD QLLL�,f
DEPTH OF WELL l MEASUREMENT METHOD W/YAhyl L 1,c/J/CT'v�
VOLUME REMOVED SD G¢LLD,✓S REMOVAL METHOD Igd4/,-)/C0-5 6D, FLO
FIELD TEST RESULTS:
COLOR CLFIORpH v /02 ODOR
e
TEMPERATURE (°F) )� • C SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (,umhos/on)
OTHER (OVA, Methane meter. etc.) ®• J AI—Jy
coNsTnVENTS SAMPLEM
REMARKS -
WELL CASING VOLUMM
GAL/FP 1-1/4" a 0.077 2" = 0.16 3" = 0.37 4" a 0.6S
Mira LIS 2.1/2" = 0.24 3-1/2" a O.SO f" a 1.46
SIR
DVTRKA
o AND SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD
dBARTILUCCI
SITE ��7y� L l� I/1� �--L SAMPLE CREW
SAMPLE LOCATION/WELLNO. /('�/ i.% 7 5
FIELD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER ;Aj Cj DATE
TII%4E WEATHER / \/tel AJ TEMPERATURE
SAMPLE TYPE:
GROUNDWATER
SURFACE WATER/STREAM
- -- SEDIMENT
AIR
SOIL OTHER (Describe, i.e., septage,
leachate)
WELL INFORMATION (fill out for groundwater samples):
DF -FM TO WATER 7 3 I MEASUREMENT METHOD J � L d 116 /-O<
��/.� 1,✓ ,
DEPTH OF WELL -� %. � S MEASUREMENT METHOD �� VL i �Z�
VOLUME REMOVED % GA LLD,y S REMOVAL METHOD
FIEI-D TEST RESULTS:
COLOR 6k pH t7 G
TEMPERATURE mC- SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (umhos/c3n)
OTHER (OVA, Methane meter. etc.) > ;,on A / y
CONsmmm 1' :lt
REMARKS:
SIR
49 �
WELL CASING VOLtJlY1F9
GALTr 1-1/4" a COW 2" = 0.14 3" = 031 4"
1-1/2" a 0.10 2.1/2" = C24 3.1/2" a 0.30 i"
D VIR KA
O AND SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD
dBARTILUCCI
SITE -Jo U % h�4 LL� �AV-7-) � L-�. SAMPLE CREW
SAMPLE LOCATION/WELLNO. LA.2 -% `J
FIELD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER `) -(-cl DATE
TII's WEATHER TEMPERATURE v
SAMPLE TYPE:
GROUNDWATER SEDMONI'
SURFACE WA
SOI.
WELL INFORMATION (fill out for groundwater samples):
AIR
OTHER (Describe, i.e., septage,
leachate)
DEPTH TO WATER , ®� MEASUREMENT METHOD AVALiW2/ <
DEPTH OF WELL a 3 °� MEASUREMENT METHOD �V4;#4 414 L
VOLUME REMOVED SS l�� �L DSS REMOVAL METHOD Q"Ao C:�
FIELD TEST RESULTS:
COLORS pH 2-7 ODOR
TEMPERATURF,(n�o4. 6 C_ SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (umhoa/at) I �D
OTHER (OVA, Methane meter, etc.) Z2 6 &,/ V
CONSTrr"UEPM SAbOIJMt A&4c&�
REMARKS:
WE.L CASING VOLUMES
GAL/FT 1-1/4" a 0.677 2" = 0.16 3" = 037 4" ' 0.63
1-9/2" a 6.16 2.1/2" a 0.24 3-1/2" a 6.36 6"m 1.46
SIR
JLDVIRKA
uo
AND SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD
BARnLUCCI
SITE fig L!� NSAMPLE CREW /Qv
SAMPLE LOCATION/WELLNO. �7
FIELD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER M il DATE -7�i�e
TIME/ 3 S / WEATHERJ J,vv - TEMPERATURE S -
SAMPLE TYPE:
GROUNDWATER
SURFACE WATERJSTREAM
SOIL
SEDIMENT
AIR
OTHER (Describe, i.e., septage,
leachate)
WELL INFORMATION (fill out for groundwater samples):
DEPTH TO WATER �� • MEASUREMENT METHOD VAJ*V 4Af vi L-�"f�/�l�•e
DEPTH OF WELL 3 MEASUREMENT METHOD 144%.4 l
VOLUME REMOVED REMOVAL METHOD A ( 4 YZ
FIELD TEST RESULTS:
COLOR A) pH
6 • 3 L ODOR
TF.beERATURE I C sPEcIFic CONDUCTANCE (t mbwcm) ZA /
OTTER (OVA, Methane meter, ea.) 7 (;-Z'
iil
WELT. CASING VOLUMES
GALFT 1-1/4" : 0.W 2" = 0.14 3" = 031 4" = 0.65
1-11r =0.10 2-1/2" = 0.24 3.112" = O30 f" = 1.46
SIR
JLDVIRKA
uo
AND SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD
CBARTELUCCI
sITE So rlJ9 L� / %�/✓�) �'� SAMPLE CREW
SAMPLE LOCATION/WELLNO.
FfE D SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER /-)A) "t) DATE
TIME WEATHER S L TEMPERATURE
SAMPLE TYPE:
GROUNDWATER
V/
SURFACE WATER/STREAM AIR
SOIL OTHER (Describe, i.e., septage,
leachate)
WELL INFORMATION (fill out for groundwater samples):
DEPTH TO WATER 5-1 3 MEASUREMENT METHOD `UA7-.4� ��dh L Z-,✓.��c,�.o2
DEPTH OF WELL - MEASURIM ENT METHOD 1[" B � fi ✓[ C L,/��i c�i�.P
VOLUME REMOVED GALLVNS REMOVAL METHOD QUM�0
F)EL.D TEST RESULTS:
COLOR L o VP
; H G C' ODOR
TEMPERATUREoy - / L SPECIFIC CONDUCrmm (umbwcm) / 2 3
OTHER (OVA, Methane meter, ete.) J vA6 D,:
MgT.j.t Aldi
CONS7TnMNTS SAMnM).- /39,;,
WML CAMM VOI.UbM
GAUrr 1-1/4" ■ CO" 2" = 0.16 3" 4" a 0.65
1-U2" a O.10 2-U2" s" Mir s o -m f" t L"
JLD VTRKA
Cuo AND SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD
BARTILUCCI
SITE V L�,t/17F �- L SAMPLE CREW(17CVW4J
SAMPLE LOCATIONIWELLNO. -e�—s
FIELD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER �� �� - DATE %
TIME / 0 3 o WEATHER n MAC J, - �- TEMPERATURE 7y b�
SAMPLE TYPE:
GROUNDWATER
SURFACE WA
SOIL
WELL INFORMATION (fill out for gmuudwater samples):
AIR
OTHER (Describe. i.e., septage,
leachate)
DEPTH TO WATER G �� MEA.SURMAENT METHOD l,l%�B/ h Ll/i L 1.✓.��Cs%,,C
DEPTH OF WELL / 2• T 9 MEASUREMENT ME'IIiOD LJ . �2l/i(- -4clojgoa
VOLUMEREMOVED2 6ash REMOVAL METiiOD )Dxg1 4%2
FIELD TEST RESULTS:
COLOR 3A"2 j PH � • A � ODOR
TnWERATURE,M</I • S C -SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (umbos/dm)
OTHER (OVA. Methane meter, etc.) % D o
CONSTTTUENTS SAIFLF.D:
L/ �oO �-7
REMARKS: I
SIR
N
W=.L CAMNG VOLUb=
GALA T 1-1/4"w&9" 2" a 0.16 3" a 0.37 4" a 0.65
1-1/2" a 4.14 2-1/2" a 4.24 3-1/2" a O.34 f" a 1.44
JLnviRKA
UO
AND SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD
CBARTILUCCI
SrIE O U, lam L;") 4,4 AJD,71 L SAMPLE CREW 96 ir,Qo�/ 1 /a0l�A
SAMPLE LOCATIONIWELLNO.
FIELD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER / �lJ �� moi/ DATE
TIME 162 7 WEATHER )ZV G% TEMPERATURE 7l9
SAMPLE TYPE:
GROUNDWATER
SURFACE WATERISTREAM AIR
SOI.
WELL INFORMATION (fill out for groundwater samples):
OTHER (Describe. i.e.. septage,
leachate)
DEP' H TO WATER (1 3 MEASUREMENT METHOD W �Til� 6 of L 1✓���C.t%O�
DEPTH OF WELL 1 3 7• �r MEASUREMENT METHOD ��,4 R ZyZi L
VOLUME REMOVED r5 -D C * U404A REMOVAL METHOD 6 ,QW as / 1)"Fzy
FIELD TEST RESULTS:
COLOR C � flf¢ z pH J �� ODOR
TIIIu,ERATURE,qr0! • 7 oC sPEciRc CONDUCTANCE (umbwan)
OTHER (OVA. Methane meter, enc.) ��j'. z G /V -/ Y
CONSITTUF1 SA11 : 1
WELL CASPIG VOLU M
GAUFT 1-V4" .O.OTI 3" 3 0.11 3" = OX 4" : 0.63
1-UZ" ■0.10 Z•VZ" : O.Z4 3 -VZ" = LSD f" s L46
Slit
JLDVTRKA
uo
AND SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD
CBARTMUCCI
Sr E S O v—,wo G�) SAMPLE CREW
SAMPLE LOCATION/WELLNO. ! ��
FOLD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER 6 W DATE
a
TIME WEATHER AI A-) TEMPERATURE 70
SAMPLE TYPE:
GROUNDWATER V/ SEDIMENT
SURFACE WA AIR
SOI. OTHER (Describe, Le.. septage,
leachate)
WELL INFORMATION (611 out for groundwater samples):
DEPTH TO WATER Z - 1 MEASUREMENT METHOD �/¢�'.( �1�•� C J: ;))4a%Da
DEPTH OF WELL S l - � MEASUREMENT METHOD 1iV//�1.4.0�Atk l
VOLUME REMOVED (9A f-CDa/S REMOVAL METHOD L-' r
FIELD TEST RESULTS:
COLOR pH 6.16 ODOR
TENG ERATUREXIK�C_SPECMC CONDUCTANCE (umbos/aa) 27(f -
OTHER
7(OTHER (OVA. Metbane meter. etc.) (57r• Aji U
CONSTTTUEN'TS SAMIgJMt
REMARKS:
SIR
WSM CASDIG VOLAMM
GALTr 1-u4;" : 0.tnf 2" a 0.16 3" 4" a 0.63
1.1/r a &10 2.1/r a 0.?4ti 3-ur ■ ojo 6" ■ 1.46
DVTRKA
OAND SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD
BARIMUCCI /
SITE 5v, 9 L�� SAMPLE CREW
�-+�i`Nr��
SAMPLE LOCATIONIWELLNO.
FIELD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER /II�J !� lJ"G'�! M S . %'I S6� DATE 7/, SL
TIME I,� oZ O WEATHER r TEMPERATURE � J r
SAlHT7U TYPE:
GROUNDWATER
SURFACE WA
SOIL
WELL INFORMATION (fill out for groundwater samples):
AIR
OTHER (Describe, i.e.. septage,
leacfiate)
DEPTH TO WATER lS L I MEASUREMENT METHOD
DEPTH OF WELL T MEASUREMENT METHOD
VOLUME REMOVED �iQ CLgP�y S REMOVAL METHOD Qi/.V,7)12 g i<htii /ci•0 %��'+�
FIELD TEST RESULTS:
COLOR 0—L-" pH
6 • 61 ODOR
TEMPERATURE / 3 . VC SPECTFIC CONDUCTANCE (tmtbwcm)
OTTER (OVA, Methane meter, etc.) 3. q AIpl-V
CONMTnJENTS SAMnZD-. -
i - �/
WE
WILL CASING VOI,L MMS
GAIJIN 1-114" : O.M Z" a 0.16 3" _ OX 4" a 0.63
I -I/2" a 0.10 Z.Vr a 0.24 3.VZ" s 0.30 f" • L46
SIR
D V TRKA
oAND SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD
BARTILUCCI /
STIE S o u -l' C D h /�-�y>/C LL SAMPLE CREW C^ A /
SAMPLE LOCATIONIWELLNO. / �% ? S
FOLD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER /'I f'lJ 7S — (; k; DATE
TIME / G 3 3 WEATHER
SAMPLE TYPE:
GROUNDWATER SED04EN T
SURFACE WA
SOIL
TEMPERATURE
AIR
OTHER (Describe, i.e.. septage,
leachate)
WELL INFORMATION (fill out for groundwater sampla):
DEFM TO WATER MEASUREMENT METHOD h� ✓� L rN� �iD�
DEPTH OF WELL 3 C� MEASURIIdEN T METHOD 41w
VOLUME REMOVED G REMOVAL METHOD
FIELD TEST RESULTS:
COLOR AV 4U AJ phi ODOR
TEMPERATURE (OF) ° C_SPECCTFIC CONDUCTANCE (umbos/am) / D
OTHER (OVA. Metbaae meta, em) A/ (J
CONST7UENTS SAMPUED.
wet, CAMM VOEAMM
GALT 1-V4" a &V" 2" a 0.16 3" = OX 4" : 0.65
1-Vr a 0.14 2-V2" a" 3-Vr a sm f" a 1.46
SIR
JLDVIRKA
o AND SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD
t3ARTILUCCI
Srm 150 Ui�-o Lr� /iiV1�,�, LL SAMPLE CREW
SAMPLE LOCATION/WELLNO.
FIELD SAMPLE I.D. NUMBER Mw ;l (�' G(J DATE /g
TIME WEATHER TEMPERATURE 'S
SAMPLE TYPE: /
GROUNDWATER SEDIMENT
SURFACE WA AIR
SOIL
OTTER (Deambe. Le.. septage,
leachate)
WELL INFORMATION (fill out for groundwater samplesr
DEPTH TO WATER �Q 3S MEASUREMENT METHOD +'Vi¢� %L� ��'� L
DEPTH OF WELL b . ��� l MEASURIIViEN'T METHODpl!Lo J/r
VOLUME REMOVED S- �/� LL®,S REMOVAL METHOD I� �o g Y�fit�•FCO o� �j
F'IEL.D TEST RESULTS:
COLOR �- it/S� 2 pH �J�- ODOR
TEMPERATUREJ71-_._SPECIIRC CONDUCTANCE (nmbakm) 6
OTHER (OVA. Methane mom eke-) P. 1-7 I i L)
REMARKS:
WELL CASING VOLLI&M
GALIFT 1-114" a #J" 2" a 0.!i 3* _ l i7 4" = 0.63
1 -UP a quo 2-1/2" =" 3-U3" a OM f" : L46
SIR
DVIRKA
O AND
dBARTILUCCI
WATER SUPPLY SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD
Name: l r'/v �� )� r/< h C% S K
Address: r�S' �-V ax L�X Cy cf�Gv� ti�
Telephone:
Date and Time Sampled: f �-..� }� -5` ? / li D 9 /7';p IX
Sample Location: /O -A j!,
Sample Number:
Well Information:
Depth and Type of Well:
Date Constructed:
Type of Construction and Diameter.
Driller:
Estimated Usage (gpm):
Water Use(s):
Type of Treatment Device and Location:
Date and Location Last Sampled:
Homeowner's Perception of Water Quality:
Continents: (Use of bottled water. etc.)
wss
Sketch of Lot. Building, and Well and Septic System Location
Fie gTi L�eo,� tT
CAk LBwz
Sketch of Water Treatment System and Sampling Locations
Photograph of Water Treatment System
i�
wss
1
a1VIRKA
o AND
dBARTILUCCI
`IWATER SUPPLY SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD
Name: `� D/4,o Z -),4,-)S K, 1
Address: ��fL�®v �9�c> C✓� eGv/r k
Telephone:
Date and Time sampled: ' —� y- ±2 / 0 -� Z /2k S
Sample Number: 9' L1/'
Well information: f L/d -4-4 LD�E /I/.0/ Ll,/2 a®2
Depth • Type of
Date Constructed:
Type of Construction and Diameter.
Estimated Usage ():
Water Use(s):
Type of Treatment Device and Location: _ / AJ
Date and Location Last $ led:
Homeowner's Perception of Water Quality:
. ,• . i _•'
Sketch of Lot. Building, and Well and Septic System Location
® Rf&0,0 IZOAn
Sketch of Water Treatment System and Sampimg Locations
Photograph of Water Trewment Systema
UK
=P1Cr- or'
DVIRKA
0 AND
dBARTMUCCI
WATER SUPPLY SAMPLE INFORMATION RECORD
Name:
Address:
Telephone: / p `7
Date and Time Sampled: :z - "qq --% / e y12R c7 -
�,� /�
Sample Location: (�V � Sr , l .S/L �,(1 � /�,� i ti1ti� S r i L, Ss r Gif T 0F ex.
Sample Number: — 3
Well Information: U-/ Aa2 AA-e7—
Depth
A-e —
Depth and Type of Well:
Date Constructed:
Type of Construction and Diameter.
Driller:
Estimated Usage (gpm):
Water Use(s):
Type of Treatment Device and Location:
Date and Location Last Sampled:
Homeowner's Perception of Water Quality:
Comments: (Use of MKfsd water. etc.)
wss
Sketch of Lot. Building, and Well and Septic System Location
C E LLA,�
oo �
oRFGo,J J�v ,4b
Sketch of Water Treatment System and Sampling Locations
Photograph of Water Treasment System
wss
349343/@
1027
D VIRKA
O , ND
BARTIMCCI DA [LY EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION LOG
Project Name: �Ou4 01d l� Date: a
Project Number. Calibrated By:
DECL
D VTR KA
La
AND
BARTILUCCI DAILY EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION LOG
Project Name: ntIZr a LQ �4 g Date: 7 �,ol
Project Number. i() .� --? Calibrated B :
bBARTD VIR KA
ILUCCI
AND DAILY EQUIP MENT'CALIBRATION LOG
ProjectName: '5nNJJ7,4(-� 4,0 �F, LL Date: 7��/9�
Project Number: / D -� = Calibrated By:
Instrument Name Calibration
and Model Number Method Time Readings and Observations
.57
r .L
z,
dLc,D VTR KA
kND
' BARMUCCI DAILY EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION LOG
Project Name: �o �c�� L.yi�� Date:
Project Number. / 0 Calibrated By:
DEQ.
D VTRKA
dbc
AND
BARTILUCCI DAILY EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION LOG
Project Name: �� - 4� ��r, L Date: % — ,� 2 -
Project
-Project Number. 107.E Calibrated By: ! �' , C
DECL
boD VTR KA
AND
BARTILUCCI DAILY EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION LOG
Project Name: Is"D Ui �,� L /�ry �!-"� Date: 7
Project Number. 4 19J :Z Calibrated By: G
DECL
D VTRKA
dLc) AND
BARTII.UCCI DAILY EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION LOG
Project Name: 501,— Date: 7 -;Z-�
Project Number. n 7 Calibrated Bv: L - S
uL;:k-"lq
Appendix B
APPENDIX B
DATA VALIDATION REPORT
30933/1
1027
i
DATA USABILITY REPORT
A total of 21 samples, 19 groundwater samples, 1 field blank and 1 trip blank, were
collected during the Phase II sampling event at the Town of Southold Landfill. The samples .were
analyzed for Baseline Parameters as required by the Part 360 permit.
The data was validated according to the 1989 NYSDEC ASP. All data was deemed 100%
contractually compliant with the exception of the hexavalent chromium data for samples
MWISGW, MWIDGW, MW7SGW and MW7DGW. Samples were analyzed 1 day out of
holding time, data is deemed usable for environmental assessment. Both volatile organic
compounds and select metals have been qualified as estimated due to QC criteria falling outside
ASP control limits. A summary of the validation findings can be found in Table 1, and Table 2
contains data user advisories which should be applied to the results.
31086
1027
Table 1
DATA VALIDATION SUMMARY
(CONTRACTUAL COMPLIANCE WITH 1989 NYSDEC ASP)
Sample
Leachate
Total Organic
Numbe
matrix
VOA**
TCL Metals
Parameters
Cartx)n
MWIDGW
Water
Acceptable*
Acceptable*
Acceptable*
Acceptable
MWISGW
Water
Acceptable*
Acceptable*
Acceptable*
Acceptable
MW2DGW
Water
Acceptable*
Acceptable*
Acceptable
Acceptable
MW2SGW
Water
Acceptable*
Acceptable*
Acceptable
Acceptable
MW3DGW
Water
Acceptable*
Acceptable*
Acceptable
Acceptable
MW3SGW
Water
Acceptable*
Acceptable*
Acceptable
Acceptable
MW4DGW
Water
Acceptable*
Acceptable*
Acceptable
Acceptable
MW4SGW
Water
Acceptable*
Acceptable*
Acceptable
Acceptable
MWSDGW
Water
Acceptable*
Acceptable*
Acceptable
Acceptable
MWSSGW
Water
Acceptable*
Acceptable*
Acceptable
Acceptable
MW6DGW
Water
Acceptable*
Acceptable*
Acceptable
Acceptable
MW6SGW
Water
Acceptable*
Acceptable*
Acceptable
Acceptable
MW6DGW MS/MSD
Water
Acceptable*
Acceptable*
Acceptable
Acceptable
MWIDGW
Water
Acceptable*
Acceptable*
Acceptable*
Acceptable
MW7SGW
Water
Acceptable*
Acceptable*
Acceptable*
Acceptable
PW001
Water
Acceptable*
Acceptable*
--
--
PW002
Water
Acceptable*
Acceptable*
--
--
PW003
Water
Acceptable*
Acceptable*
--
--
FB02724
Distilled Water
Acceptable*
Acceptable*
Acceptable
Acceptable
Trip Blank
Distilled Water
Acceptable*
--
--
--
S68831
Water
Acceptable
Acceptable*
--
--
S68916
Water
Acceptable
Acceptable*
--
--
*See Table 2
**Analyzed by Method 601/602
--Not Required
53099G/1
1027/1
Table 2
DATA USER ADVISORIES FOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
ale Number M Data Fraction
Data User Advisory
Continents
MWIDGW Water VOA(601/602)
Methylene
Qualified as
Compound concentration
Chloride
Nondetected
less than 10X blank
concentration.
1,1 Dichloroethene
Qualified as
Calibration criteria
Estimated
not met.
2 Chloroethyl Vinyl
Qualified as estimated
Calibration criteria
Ether
not met.
MetalS
Iron, Lead
Qualified as estimated.
Matrix spike recoveries
Manganese
Biased high
exceeded 125%.
Aluminum, Chromium,
Qualified as estimated
Several differences
Cobalt, Nickel and
were not met
Zinc
within the contract
specified +10%.
Leachate
Hexavalent
Qualified as estimated
Analyzed I day out
Chromium
of hold.
S3099G/1
1027/2
Table 2 (continued)
DATA USER ADVISORIES FOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
ale Ntumber mr auix Data Fraction
Data User Advisory
Comments
MWISGW Water VOA(601/602)
Methylene
Qualified as
Compound concentration
Chloride
Nondetected
less than l0X blank
concentration.
1,1 Dichloroethene
Qualified as
Calibration criteria
Estimated
not met
2 Chloroethyl Vinyl
Qualified as estimated
Calibration criteria
Ether
not met
Metals
Iron, Lead
Qualified as estimated.
Matrix spike recoveries
Manganese
Biased high
exceeded 125%.
Aluminum, Chromium,
Qualified as estimated
Several differences
Cobalt, Nickel and
were not within the
Zinc
contract. Specified
+10%.
Leachate
Hexavalent
Qualified as estimated
Analyzed 1 day out
Chromium
of hold.
53099G/1
1027/3
ale Number
MW2SGW Water
S3099G/1
1027/4
Table 2 (continued)
DATA USER ADVISORIES FOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
Data Fraction
VOA(601/602)
Methylene
Chloride
1,1 Dichloroethene
Data User Advisory
Qualified as
Nondetected
Qualified as
Estimated
2 Chloroethyl Vinyl Qualified as estimated
Ether
Metal
Iron, Lead Qualified as estimated.
Manganese Biased high
Aluminum, Chromium, Qualified as estimated
Cobalt, Nickel and
Zinc
Comments
Compound concentration
less than IOX blank
concentration.
Calibration criteria
not met
Calibration criteria
not met
Matrix spike recoveries
exceeded 125%.
Several differences
were not within the
contract. Specified
+10%.
MW2DGW WAate
l
53099G/1
1027/5
Water
Table 2 (continued)
DATA USER ADVISORIES FOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
Data Fraction
Data User Advisory
Cominents
VOA(601/602)
Methylene
Qualified as
Compound concentration
Chloride
Nondetected
le„ than IOX blank
concentration.
1,1 Dichloroethene
Qualified as
Calibration critena
Estimated
not met
2 Chloroethyl Vinyl
Qualified as estimated
Calibration criteria
Ether
not met
Meta
Lead
Qualified as estimated
Control limits for the
relative percent dif-
ferences were not met.
Iron, Silver
Qualified as estimated.
Matrix spike recoveries
Biased high
exceeded 125%.
Aluminum, Barium,
Qualified as estimated
Serial dilution dif-
Beryllium, Cadmium,
ferences were not with -
Chromium, Magnesium,
in contract specified
Potassium, Sodium
limits.
and Zinc
VOA(601 /602 )
Methylene
Qualified as
Compound concentration
Chloride
Nondetected
less than lOX blank
concentration.
1,1 Dichloroethene
Qualified as
Calibration criteria
Estimated
not met.
53099G/1
1027/6
Table
2 (continued)
DATA USER ADVISORIES FOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
ale Num
M Data Fraction
Data User Advisory
Comments
MW3SGW
Water 2 Chloroethyl Vinyl
Qualified as estimated
Calibration criteria
(continued)
Ether
not met.
Metals
Iron, Lead
Qualified as estimated.
Matrix spike recoveries
Manganese
Biased high
exceeded 125%.
Aluminum, Chromium,
Qualified as estimated
Several differences
Cobalt, Nickel and
were not met
Zinc
within the contract
specified +10%.
MW3DGW
Water VOA(601/602)
Methylene
Qualified as
Compound concentration
Chloride
Nondetected
less than IOX blank
concentration.
1,1 Dichloroethene
Qualified as
Calibration criteria
Estimated
not met
2 Chloroethyl Vinyl
Qualified as estimated
Calibration criteria
Ether
not met
Metals
Lead
Qualified as estimated
Control limits for the
relative percent dif-
ferences were not met.
53099G/1
1027/6
Table 2 (continued)
DATA USER ADVISORIES FOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
ale NUM Mrl Vata >;rawon
Data User Advisory
MW3DGW Water Iron, Silver
Qualified as estimated.
(continued)
Biased high
Aluminum, Barium,
Qualified as estimated
Berylium, Cadmium,
Chromium, Magnesium,
Potassium, Sodium
and Zinc
MW4SGW Water VOA(601/6021
Methylene
Qualified as
Chloride
Nondetected
1,1 Dichloroethene
2 Chloroethyl Vinyl
Ether
Metals
Lead
Iron, Silver
Aluminum, Barium,
Berylium, Cadmium,
Chromium, Magnesium,
Potassium, Sodium
and Zinc
S3099G/1
1027/7
Qualified as
Estimated
Qualified as estimated
-Qualified as estimated
Qualified as estimated
B lased high
Qualified as estimated
Comments
Matrix spike recoveries
exceeded 125%.
Serial dilution dif-
ferences were not with-
in contract specified
limits.
Compound concentration
less than 10X blank
concentration.
Calibration criteria
not met
Calibration criteria
not met
Control limits for the
relative percent dif-
ferences were not met.
Matrix spike recoveries
exceeded 125%
Serial dilution dif-
ferences were not with-
in contract specified
limits.
ale Number
MW4DGW Water
MWSSGW
53099G/1
1027/8
Water
t
Table 2 (continued)
DATA USER ADVISORIES FOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
Data Freon
VOA(601/602)
Methylene
Chloride
1,1 Dichloroethene
2 Chloroethyl Vinyl
Ether
Lead
Iron, Silver
Aluminon, Barium,
Berylium, Cadmium,
Chromium, Magnesium,
Potassium, Sodium
and Zinc
VOA(601 /602)
Methylene
Chloride
1,1 Dichloroethene
Qualified as
Nondetected
Qualified as
Estimated
Qualified as estimated
Qualified as estimated
Qualified as estimated.
Biased high
Qualified as estimated
Qualified as
Nondetected
Qualified as
Estimated
Comments
Compound concentration
less than lOX blank
concentration.
Calibration criteria
not met
Calibration criteria
not met
Control limits for the
relative percent dif-
ferences were not met.
Matrix spike recoveries
exceeded 125%.
Serial dilution dif-
ferences were not with-
in contract specified
limits.
Compound concentration
less than IOX blank
concentration.
Calibration criteria
not met
Table 2 (continued)
DATA USER ADVISORIES FOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
ale Nurn M Data Fraction Data User Advisory
MWSSGW Water 2 Chloroethyl Vinyl Qualified as estimated
(continued) Ether
Metals
Lead Qualified as estimated
Iron, Silver
Qualified as estimated.
Biased high
Aluminum, Barium,
Qualified as estimated
Berylium, Cadmium,
Chromium, Magnesium,
Potassium, Sodium
and Zinc
Uachate
Hexavalent Chromium
Qualified as estimated
MWSDGW Water VOA(601/602)
Methylene
Qualified as
Chloride
Nondetected
1,1 Dichloroethene
Qualified as
Estimated
2 Chloroethyl Vinyl
Qualified as estimated
Ether
Metals
Lead
Qualified as estimated
Cotntnents
Calibration criteria
not met
Control limits for the
relative percent dif-
ferences were not met.
Matrix spike recoveries
exceeded 125%.
Serial dilution dif-
ferences were not with-
in contract specified
limits.
Analyzed 1 day out of
hold.
Compound concentration
less than 10X blank
concentration.
Calibration criteria
not met
Calibration criteria
not met
Control limits for the
relative percent dif-
ferences were not niet
Table 2 (continued)
DATA USER ADVISORIES FOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
ale Number M Data Fraction Data User Advisory
MW5DGW Water Iron, Silver Qualified as estimated.
(continued) Biased high
Aluminum, Barium, Qualified as estimated
Berylium, Cadmium,
Chromium, Magnesium,
Potassium, Sodium
and Zinc
Hexavalent Chromium
MW6SGW Water VOA(601/602)
Methylene
Chloride
1,1 Dichloroethene
2 Chloroethyl Vinyl
Ether
Metals
Iron, Lead
Manganese
Aluminum, Chromium,
Cobalt, Nickel and
Zinc
S3099G/1
1027/10
Qualified as estimated
Qualified as
Nondetected
Qualified as
Estimated
Qualified as estimated
Qualified as estimated.
Biased high
Qualified as estimated
Comments
Matrix spike recoveries
exceeded 125%.
Serial dilution dif-
ferences were not with-
in contract specified
limits.
Analyzed 1 day out of
hold.
Compound concentration
less than 10X blank
concentration.
Calibration criteria
not met.
Calibration criteria
not met.
Matrix spike recoveries
exceeded 125%.
Several differences
were not met
within the contract
specified +10%.
ale Number Matri
MW6DGW Water
MW7SGW
S3099G/1
im7ii 1
Table 2 (continued)
DATA USER ADVISORIES FOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
Data Fraction
Data User Advisory
VOA(601 /602)
Methylene
Qualified as
Chloride
Nondetected
1,1 Dichloroethene
Qualified as
Estimated
2 Chloroethyl Vinyl
Qualified as estimated
Ether
Metals
Iron, bead
Qualified as estimated.
Manganese
Biased high
Aluminum, Chromium,
Qualified as estimated
Cobalt, Nickel and
Zinc
Water VOA(601/6021
Methylene
Chloride
1,1 Dichloroethene
Qualified as
Nondetected
Qualified as
Estimated
Conunents
Compound concentration
less than IOX blank
concentration.
Calibration criteria
not met.
Calibration criteria
not met.
Matrix spike recoveries
exceeded 125%u
Several differences
were not met
within the contract
specified +10%.
Compound concentration
less than lOX blank
concentration.
Calibration criteria
i
not met.
Table 2 (continued)
DATA USER ADVISORIES FOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
ale Number rix Data Fraction Data User Advisory
MW7SGW Water 2 Chloroethyl Vinyl Qualified as estimated
(continued) Ether
Metals
Iron, Lead Qualified as estimated.
Manganese Biased high
Aluminum, Chromium, Qualified as estimated
Cobalt, Nickel and
Zinc
MW7DGW Water
53099G/1
1027/12
Leachate
Hexavalent Chromium
VOA(6011602)
Methylene
Chloride
1,1 Dichloroethene
2 Chloroethyl Vinyl
Ether
Metals
Iron, Lead
Manganese
Qualified as estimated
Qualified as
Nondetected
Qualified as
Estimated
Qualified as estimated
Comments
Calibration criteria
not met.
Matrix spike recoveries
exceeded 125%.
Several differences
were not met
within the contract
specified +10%.
Analyzed 1 day out of
holding tune.
Compound concentration
less than 10X blank
concentration.
Calibration criteria
not met.
Calibration criteria
not met.
Qualified as estimated. Matrix spike recoveries
Biased high exceeded 125%.
Table 2 (continued)
DATA USER ADVISORIES FOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
ale Number prix
Data Fraction
Data User Adviaory
Comments
MW7DGW Water
Aluminum, Chromium,
Qualified as estimated
Several differences
(continued)
Cobalt, Nickel and
Zinc
were not met
within the contract
specified +10%.
Leachate
Hexavalent Chromium
Qualified as estimated
Analyzed l day out of
holding time.
PWO01 Water
VOA(601/602)
Methylene
Qualified as
Compound concentration
Chloride
Nondetected
less than IOX blank
concentration.
1,1 Dichloroethene
Qualified as
Calibration criteria
Estimated
not met.
2 Chloroethyl Vinyl
Qualified as estimated
Calibration criteria
Ether
not met.
Metal
Iron, Lead
Qualified as estimated.
Matrix spike recoveries
Manganese
Biased high
exceeded 125%.
Aluminum, Chromium,
Qualified as estimated
Several differences
Cobalt, Nickel and
were not met
Zinc
within the contract
specified +10%.
PW002 Water
VOA(601/602)
Methylene
Qualified as
Compound concentration
Chloride
Nondetected
less than 1OX blank
concentration.
53099G/1
1027/13
Table 2 (continued)
DATA USER ADVISORIES FOR TOWN OF SOU MOLD LANDFILL
Stele NumberMatrix Data Fraction Data User Advisory
PWO02 Water 1,1 Dichloroethene Qualified as
(continued) Estimated
PWO03
53099G/1
1027/14
2 Chloroethyl Vinyl
Qualified as estimated
Ether
Metals
Iron, Lead
Qualified as estimated.
Manganese
Biased high
Aluminum, Chromium,
Qualified as estimated
Cobalt, Nickel and
Zinc
Water VOA(601/602)
Methylene
Qualified as
Chloride
Nondetected
1,1 Dichloroethene
Qualified as
Estimated
2 Chloroethyl Vinyl
Qualified as estimated
Ether
Comments
Calibration criteria
not met.
Calibration criteria
not met.
Matrix spike recoveries
exceeded 125%.
Several differences
were not met
within the contract
specified +10%.
Compound concentration
less than 10X blank
concentration.
Calibration criteria
not met.
Calibration criteria
not met.
Table 2 (continued)
DATA USER ADVISORIES FOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
ale Numbermamix Data Fraction
Data User Advisory
PWO03 Water Metals
(continued) Iron, Lead
Qualified as estimated.
Manganese
Biased high
Aluminum, Chromium,
Qualified as estimated
Cobalt, Nickel and
Zinc
568916 Water VOA(601/602)
Methylene
Qualified as
Chloride
estimated
1,1 Dichloroethene
Qualified as
Estimated
2 Chloroethyl Vinyl
Qualified as estimated
Ether
Meta
Chromium, Iron, Lead
Qualified as estimated.
Iron, Manganese
Qualified as estimated.
B lased high.
53099G/1
1027/15
Continents
Matrix spike recoveries
exceeded 125%.
Several differences
were not met
within the contract
specified +10%.
Calibration criteria
not met.
Calibration criteria
not met.
Calibration criteria
not met.
Control limits for the
RPDs were not met.
Matrix spike recoveries
exceeded 125%.
Table 2 (continued)
DATA USER ADVISORIES FOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LANDFILL
ale Number Data Fraction Data User Adviso
568916 Water Aluminum, Chromium, Qualified as estimated
(continued) Cobalt, Nickel and
Zinc
S68831 Water VOA(601/602)
Methylene Qualified as
Chloride estimated
1,1 Dichloroethene
2 Chloroethyl Vinyl
Ether
Metals
Chromium, Iron, Lead
Qualified as
Estimated
Qualified as estimated
Qualified as estimated.
Iron, Manganese Qualified as estimated
Biased high.
Aluminum, Chromium, Qualified as estimated
Cobalt, Nickel and
Zinc
53099G/1
in,)-piir
Comments
Several differences
were not met
within the contract
specified +10%.
Calibration criteria
not met.
Calibration critena
not met.
Calibration criteria
not met.
Control limits for the
RPDs were not met.
Matrix spike recoveries
exceeded 125%.
Several differences
were not met
within the contract
specified +10%.
Table 2 (continued)
DATA USER ADVISORIES FOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LANDFILL.
Sample Number M Data Fraction
Data User Advisory
Comments
FB0724 Water VOA(601/602)
Methylene
Qualified as nondetected
Compound concentration
Chloride
less than IOX blank
concentration.
1,1 Dichloroethene
Qualified as estimated
Calibration criteria
not met.
2 Chloroethyl Vinyl
Qualified as estimated
Calibration criteria
Ether
not met.
Metals
Iron, Lead
Qualified as estimated.
Matrix spike recoveries
Manganese
Biased high
exceeded 125%.
Aluminum, Chromium,
Qualified as estimated
Several differences
Cobalt, Nickel and
were not met
Zinc
within the contract
specified +10/0.
S3099G/1
1027/17
DATA VALIOATION-ORGANICS
Site Name: (-Li4l) C( kf(VY<Laboratory Name:
Rev ewer:
Date of Review:
i
J
I. Data Deliverable Requirements
A. Legible
Yes
No
B. Paginated
Ye
No
C. Arranged in order
No
D. Consistent dates
a
No
E. Case Narrative
Ye�'
No
F. Chain -of -Custody Record
(Yes
No
G. Sample Data Complete
Yes
No
H. Standard Date Complete
ciej�
No
I. Raw QC Data Complete
Yes
No
Comments:
X16 6, .
DATA VALIDATION -ORGANICS
Si to Name:, C u ".\r ( �'k LLaboratory Name: K �-f 4,S't— (S" i -i I,-; , (, I f III �, ,`rc ( •, ;
Reviewer: c,
J
II. Holding Times
Sample I.D.
Date
Received
"5 S 7-c
i I -k w -cI S -c-
7/2,ea/ c?
7 - C:
W -Q 6 G LC
7 /.2& / g am
FLlW —(oS -GLO
500-7-ce4
kkAI -r1-- 6L.L
7/2-gl<la
3qL 7-0 13-
�,�� -� �a-c--��
712 / �a
-1/30/5�
3 u /C
Fi e I cl Uan i--
34S 7-U7
Tr,n r31a,i
,4 &,T- 01
S - (cS ct 1 7 / ao /9,;L
134S'-:--02
S -- (- SF -71 U)/9
�so1
t-tQ--)5-c-,.c -7���,9z
34aso.3
NW -3S - (S ,c)
FLlW —(oS -GLO
M LO -(o b _G L-0
�4D5c 7
rPw-1
1 34 3L" o,:2)
PLC -i
t
-1/30/5�
3 u /C
Fi e I cl Uan i--
34l zo I MVC - IS - 6 L -7/.13�q a
341a c --A Kx v -D - -7S - G LC
{ I c3 �uu. -- lD-GL-'
G
Date of Review: / �� / 21.
DateDate Holding Time
Extracted Analyzed Exceeded
ti/A
7131(���
-731
7/-3
-7/3c%9,�?
AJ/A
8 � S/ R -�. �v `-
N �A-
'7 30
7/31/gd
7/31 / 9 -),
-7/31 /9
7/31 19
t
-1/30/5�
NSA
-7 /3ol q a
-7130 q :�
713 -/q a
-7/3c/ q� _
7/3ujq
DATA VALIDATION -ORGANICS
Site Name: ���G�c1C' �rc��'+i �� Laboratory Name: I F& 1. , I"": rl,11�'c�`I
Reviewer: << �
x l: Date of Review:_
��� <C�c�
r racti on:
III. Tune Summary
Aioan*stile 7 (+f9mmantt
U111:
�
r i i V
Iv
n m
2.
3.
4.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
DATA VALIDATION -ORGANICS
Site Name: CCuL�(cl �w)dCiI(Laboratory Name: ,-e- C��i�1��1�L�i!,(
Reviewer:
���Ccr��cc C CSC• L Ccr-C 1 ( Date of Review:
; i�
J
Fraction: � C
IV. Initial Calibration Summary (GC*"")
P r-
Date of Calibration:? `�-3
A. Standard Data Files , ,Y\ e
Standard 1 ID: VS f4t)% Conc:
Standard 2 ID: UConc: /y c),O 6
Standard 3 I0: VS o Conc: 90 4242
Standard 4 I0: VS 5 O DOB
Standard S ID: 4 S f- (cc, Q�
B. 1. All ria ?
- - Yes
2. Calculate a SPEC averW-
Conc: C ac,h
Conc • to�o6
No
Comments: `+ G /
O i ) O Ln U�r+ PSD �S r, —,o rQ k-; �'Vl CIL\ 30 c! o
-.-
-340/6
7
li l� j ,Q Te- -rcLchtoro1-+'har)e : 34,?9%
Ll
DATA VALIOATION-ORGANICS
Site Name: Snu-,4� &(Cj Lu)dCO(Laboratory Name: _ 1.Li A-eSE �rr1�' Ir�h IM <ltC�I
Reviewer: btc a Cc (C'
Date of Review: I r�lga
Fraction: Y 0 A
<<,
IV. Initial Calibration Summary (GC1
Date of Calibration: 9a {-� (S c•�i C
A. Standard Data Files
Standard 1 I0: 1/S 10 Conc: 5-o2,06
Standard 2 I0: VS 0 �2 Conc:
Standard 3 I0: VS _Qo nab Conc:�D '0t0 IS 5 7
Standard 4 I0: VS+ SD b Cont: SO no%
Standard S I0: V54- (cc QQ b Conc: /off 1 7 :t
B. 1. All S t Criteria ?
No
2. Cal cu 1 ate—a—SRCZ average RRF
Comments: -'Ock r `IO P.S fhs QU GC.kr- f h ar,
cis , � 3 `� ¢ Oxn
►,lelen�or
3 ® °/o
�F� 43.-310/0
DATA VALIDATION -ORGANICS
Site Name: f' -Arco (ickJ Laboratory Name:
U
Reviewer: �
�t V-
Date of Review:
(Z
Fraction:
Date of Calibration:
C-1 l
IV. Initial
Calibration Summary
(continued)
2. All CCC met Criteria ?
No
Comments:
Calculate a CCC % RSO
C. 1. Was the tune for the initial bration acceptable ?
.i
Yes No
2. Was the calibration condu within 12 hours of the tune ?
Yes No
Comments: 6rcl /&0 a
G/
LL IL �f,La_L1 Ion/n �'1C1ti9-EUFC'SP ilrc�f�0cl_ CsLI�CrL�� `'���SiJ's
�2 SS �incL 30
"Yo QsD's We LQ- 7 300/0
D. Overall assessment of the initial
(list the associated samples)
W ?S
k _ kA LL) I S
5(9 0 31 e�,v1GE "ti3 0
�SVlvLLIC tae . ICBG �eL .PSh rnlL
calibration: � j J v,�k 4-� Sct_,Pl
was_ M
i P C0 cc) 2
DATA VALIDATION -ORGANICS
Site Name: OLILA Cf(/ Laboratory Name: e,n� fro—
Reviewer: �i.UA b(Cc�LLCLCCL Date of Review:_q Z/ 7�9
Fraction: IAC
VI. Continuing Calibration Summary (GC/ Y
Date of Initial Calibration: 1-,2 9
Date of Continuing Calibration: File ID: PC 0
A. 1. All SPCC met criteria ?
Yes No
Calculate a SPCC RRF
Comments:
clob
2. All .EeC met criteria ?
Calculate a Cee% D
Comments:- C1 U e_ °lo
Yes No
+�C&_n aS• k ow e U{
�C,I-t cl W `'v
B. Overall assessmWnt of Continuing Calibration
(list associates samples)
S-[";�gl(v,S(Css>I
�S
U�o r,
DATA VALIDATION -ORGANICS
Site Name: 5e�.L_4\CACI LLU.\c( Laboratory Name: ��; Sf �'L-„ ,����� n�tl
Reviewer: U(I i -a lbc C,ILC Date of Review:
Fraction: V R
VI. Continuing Calibration Summary (GCBs)
Date of Initial Calibration: -7499 19a
Date of Continuing Calibration: S File ID: 14 %2 5E3 0
oo D
2. Al l C-ec met criteria ?
Yes CNo
Calculate a = Y 0
Comments:
HW,
Cri
)0U Y - cud eta CO W f -t— Sljii
1_ /10 a,��rn c S .
B. Overall assessment of Continuing Calibration
(list associates samples)
DATA VALIDATION -ORGANICS
Site Name: ISICL-i �C (� zur)d. .F Laboratory Name: W -\V urc,nrY���
Rev ewer: Via-. - g- �cr— c�-` Date of Review:
Fraction: ��� A
VI. Continuing Calibration Summary (GCI'
Date of Initial Calibration: 7I�� Lq -a- 144 6-!, C, D
Date of Continuing Calibration: 3v�9 File I0:
A. 1. All SPCC met criteria ?
Yes N
Calculate a SPCC RRF
Comments:
2. All U� met criteria ?
Yes CNo
Calculate a GP % 0
Comments:
YYl e'4-�1y 011 lar,
c_ F„r, �...� .. x,vN o f ect hr 4,
5 jp Q,t id cuka td UM �qt.e,. ScmpLes . �;,Al me4-11q ttne O h to ride: d e 4c 'ov) S �or
B. Overall assessment of Continuing Calibration + So-�mp(� -u (l
(list associates samples) decrrexf- riarld�.hev+-. See
-Qs X1,1 u� -3S �1 w —(o S M W -(o /J IOW -i cy 'z 1�24qd -_3_ 1 6 w
e
�1 e (cJ !ten e- , kA W- l s , - -7S . Irl w -I IJ _ MW -70. ir-iOBLCLot
DATA VALIDATION -ORGANICS
Si to Name: `� S� �{��cicl �<<���� � Laboratory Name:1�LCvr v rcnvx.L-�-�tk' /nC_
LNC c
Reviewer:
LLC �� Date of Review: 7
ZL/
Fraction: `LC A—
VI. Continuing Calibration Summary (GC/b
Date of Initial Calibration: �1 / I,;) -
Date of Continuing Calibration: 30 )(1 ;- File ID: hE E s- CCS
.A. 1. All SPCC met criteria ?
Yes
Calculate a SPCC RRF
Comments:
2. All CSE met criteria ?
Yes
Calculate a CCC % 0
`
Comments: to jS:L, Ole) lJ 'S u-q�eC -
n �tiM-- C4 LL,(J-® '4¢ oriL'-f1J
-o } CTL ti`�
Lt3 f Continuing
,fit, rnP B. Over -a a essmen o g
(list associates samples)
ULu-3S w-35 IllW -(oS Gllc
7 5
No
ONO
CJei
lib pion Q—
s`' no -we Lk -e Y- M ek,
- � PVJ -z acv- 3
t 1- 7 0 ra a R /,in
DATA VALIDATION—ORGANICS
Site Name: Lc ���Laboratory Name: �����',, �vl,�trrit
R e v i ewer: I (I I mac, ( <<C• i U -i- (li Date of Review:_
J
Fraction: 1 C
VI. Continuing Calibration Summary (GC,
Date of Initial Calibration:
Date of Continuing Calibration: 7/3f / 9File ID: ?E E�c-c,
A. 1. All SPCC met criteria ?
Yes _No��
Calculate a SPCC RRF
Comments:
2. All Cermet criteria ?
Yes No
Calculate a SZ D
Comments:
° o/ t 's w-e—Le ,
.. C0ry-)P9UL41d5
�� OCore t, 0 0-&J1 C n
B. Overall assessment of Continuing Calibration
(list associates samples)
2 V—
S
PLk) 4'S 1, b lCA)�C)1 �AWA,1W50-,MLU3f� P w3() ,44 U(etrtL
DATA VALIDATION -ORGANICS
Site Name: L u Laboratory Name:�1� lr�C��>1Prl�cl
Reviewer: t Date of Review:
�--
Fraction: VOA
i
VI. Continuing Calibration Summary (GUMS)
.f
Date of Initial Calibration:`%9a
Date of Continuing Calibration: 7i File ID:
A. 1. All SPCC met criteria ?
Yes No
s
Calculate a SPCC RRF
Comments:
0/O D
2. All CC -met criteria ?
Yes No
Calculate a QM- % D
Comments: 7hrejt., %15'
om PQlA4'ld5
B. Overall assessment of Continuing Calibration
(list associates samples)
LA U1 � S . A-1 L,L � (3 Ili ,z) S S k. Uj I /lam! !.l..) L iu LU
V'
S
/C
I
DATA VALIDATION -ORGANICS
Site Name: fhc<cci�C� Laboratory Name:
R e v i ewer:/lP Cl !Cf '.l (ZDate of Review:
Fraction: I'I /;.`i1
IX. Blank Summary
Date/Time of Analysis: �'IlL1�P" �.� �z vT File ID:�� z
C2?ngound Concentration Com n
List{
the
( /
s�amp-les associated
j with At�his m/e�thhold bl/an/k.
DATA VALIDATION -ORGANICS
Site Name: S c4c (c➢ ,LC'PLd A f ( Laboratory Name: �FS� C �_,\; L�_ C .�-1ct l � "\ ('-
Reviewer:
_
Reviewer: �-JI LT�cz l� ,C(,, LCA.- CLL Date of Review:7-
Fraction:
IX. Blank Summary
Date/Time of Analysis: if
Compound Concentration
P44utiu c.h►c�r«Ap- /-, I
File ID: ('/ � L k C'
s �RQLCimm n
Al/ sawp&5
es s /l C-kl 10
Ccnoe►l1VCLK(!Yl
bUt iI �- ) * -JLSL.rp 4'c r
cUs v CL UL" Sly c �� l
b.c) 6 ta�2eo
List the samples associated with this method blank.
rir /C ! 8 lcc,1 K P W - �s M � - 3 S M W � � ' %�
(_o- 3 til W - (C �— 6 L� � 5 : � tU - � 0- G W M s� llit (.l) I S. M tA)16
_ J
r
DATA VALIDATION -ORGANICS
f
Site Name: '(A Laboratory Name: LX
J
Reviewer: L6/t'L Date of Review:
Fraction: A
IX. Blank Summary
Date/Time of Analysis: 7/ 3� 1,13
Concentration
File I0: �g L
I M
Comments
List the samples associated with this method blank.
ri e tc f etc, h 1 C , til Lv — :2 LU) , 3 5 /l-(
P cu.% — Z P6U — 3
DATA VALIOATION-ORGANICS
f I
Site Name: 7 -k-�nC �C� LLaboratory Name: rch(^,V l,C( Ind
-nevi ewer: Date of Review:
Fraction:
IX. Blank Summary
Date/Time of Analysis: -7 �� = 3� File I0: V L- Ic, 4
Co7cound Concentration < M C mm n
C c:�1 �-��•� eco I,•ss �iG
Ic xis fig L(7ti1� �vll-rcLh'cI
AL� CCULIJJ
a=ML cl
List the samples associated with this method blank.
�� l`,
-45 4'0
DATA VALIOATION-ORGANICS
S1 to Name: �c ��c Irl Laboratory Name: L rif-r(�„LC iLI-a' !L,
Revi ewer: � �r- (I Date of Review: /9D
Fraction: fk
X. Surrogate Recovery Summary
Were all surrogate recoveries within the contract limits ?
cyes) No
If No, please note below.
Surrogate Compound
Sample Outside Recovery Limits
Amount Above
Contract Requirement Comments
DATA VALIDATION -ORGANICS
Site Name: ���C� JJ [Ck.Ocl �-� l Laboratory Name: ItC4 , rliUnl
Reviewer: Date of Review:
Fraction: _,,0 It
XI. Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Summary
Sample ID: 1: 445 IAlLerL-) Matrix: U.'CL►`
Did the MS/MSD recovery data meet the contract recommended requirements ?
Yes No
If No. please note below.
DATA VALIDATION - METALS
Site Name: x
�l �, c W,61
(( Laboratory Name:
~evewer: (
Ri�� �,��c�� r$-� Date of Review:
_ �`-��: �� �
r
\;
7-2 4
- I. Holding times
�iIS(QZ�r �VG
,_,` (3L t -Mu:l56L4-; 7/2,31q
g/(c: --8113
- AA LU.756k 7/x-1* 9�
Date
Date
Date
Holding Time
Samole I.D.
Received
Digested
Analyzed
Exceeded?
- 1 5 7cs- NA LC 9L)C.(k
7/--)F, q QL
C-a�
3g3S-o -7/a4/Sa
f5 7o(c NLLjL)6LC
7/--)E)iq -)L-
1S70a
5- 7 C, -a- (Lt LL4OC-tc=
7/20(nI
S7C( kiU.�SC%Aj
-7 12-2;j
s /�
L.1.'4t5 C- LL'1)
7/Z1?,! < -
5 7ci5 ..M V-;456LLS
7(28112.
t\AW5") C-
7118192,
7/ 2-819,
�`; -C-•a S 3 ! -7 3c'
-010 5 (.-li�ClI�t�
-115-c"15 3 (,2 ��' q 1(o S
7-2 4
��ti��3 1Llu 11)C -,Lc 7/23( q;j $IS�c1
�iIS(QZ�r �VG
,_,` (3L t -Mu:l56L4-; 7/2,31q
g/(c: --8113
- AA LU.756k 7/x-1* 9�
3 435 C-4 -tit w6DGaJ
712,4/7
X413 - AA k -L, 7 L) -712310)
?/a4/5'a.
3g3S-o -7/a4/Sa
5-0 q
DATA VALIDATION - METALS
Site Name:-�cl+� lI Laboratory Name: �;•-��F,'��„"
Rev i ewer : L� C cmc- CU, Date of Rev i ew:
Associated Samples: S g `l(c ZZ4•
1 • _
I '
II. Initial Cal"iPat ion
y
1. Were all initial instrument calibrations performed?
Yes J No
Comments:
2. Were the initial calibration verification standards analyzed at the
contract specified frequency?
rr
Yes No
Comments:
3. Were the initial calibration results within the control limits listed
below?
For tin and mercury: 80-120% of the true value
For all other metals: 90-110% of the true value
Yes No
If "No", note analytes
-
k l 0O r
i T r
DATA VALIDATION - METALS
Site Name: JC,0- `'C-, CA ,L 1t) 14L/Laboratory Name: ,, 4-x,4 q,,� �► ,;rii�, �ctl �C
Reviewer: �J c,c j u- L�-Date of Review:
Associated Samples: S/oES 31
a i� III.'�on`'inuing Calibration
1. Were the continuing calibration verification standards analyzed at the
contract specified frequency?
Yes No
,f Comments:
2. Were the continuing calibration results within the control limits listed
below?
For tin and mercury: 80-120% of the true value
ti
For all other metals: 90-110% of the true value
Yes No
f If "No", note analytes
I
DATA VALIDATION - METALS
S;te Name: �c���1,� lc, �n;nr«� (� Laboratory Name: �� �PS�- t't i�c� iILC� f0q
�eviewer:� (i r, (rr , CL t Date of Review: It -,2i
.I
IY. Blank Summary
A. Method Blanks
"
I. Was a method blank prepared and
analyzed at
the contract specified
frequency?
Yes, No
2. Were all the analytes below the
CROL in the
method blank?
Y'
No
Comments:
B. Calibration Blanks
I. -Were all initial and continuing
calibration
blanks analyzed at the
contract specified frequency?
�sYe No
__.
2. Were all a analytes below the
CROL in all
the calibration blanks?
Yes No
Comments:
=' DATA VALIDATION - METALS
Site Name:___ Laboratory Name: ti��sf
�t IC
Reviewer: �I� ��: \,,-�...,,Lrrl, Date of Review: �1'lo7i �C1
V. Duplicate Analysis
1. Was a duplicate prepared and analyzed at the contract specified
II frequency?
eel Yes No
�
1
Comments:
2. Were control limits for the relative percent differences (RPO) met for
each analyte?
Yes No
For sample values >5 times the CROL, the RPO control limit is 20x.
For sample values <5 times the CROL, the RPD control limit is ±CROL.
If sample results were outside of the control limits, all data"**
ata associated
with that duplicate sample should have been flagged with a .
DATA VALIDATION - METALS
JP)6 d �ccnChc tic Laborator Name: I�)�/ K S�" � Y1 r(Ccyil %u c r�G'
Site Name: .:C� y
Reviewer: K ,u/tCQ Date of Review:
1
t
Vi. Matrix Spike Analysis
1. Was a matrix spike prepared and analyzed at the contract specified
frequency?
Yes No
Comments:
2. Were the matrix spike recovereis within the contract specified control
limits (15-125X)?
Yes No
if "No". note analytes ��� Ccll '►�-�-d-�- U( �G`� �1 u�O ��
Data should have been flagged wqth "N' for analytes out of control limits.
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of
four or more, no flag is required.
DATA VALIDATION - METALS
JJ^^
Sit a Name: c,� Laboratory Name: u F� �_ l [, ��:�� )U, 4t -k(
Reviewer: Date of Review:
I
VII. ICP Interference Check Sample Summary
1. Was the ICP serial dilution analyzed at the contract specified
frequency?
Yes No
Comments:
2. Were the serial dilution differences within the contract specified
limits of +:w -10X7
Yes CN.
Comments
� Zt
3. Was the ICP CROL ctreck standard analyzed at the contract specified
frequency for the analytes required?
Yes j No
Comments
Ya it i Q
DATA VALIDATION - METALS
S i to Name:i' '
'Laboratory Name:
reviewerDate of Review:
5 �
VII. ICP Interference Check Sample Summary (continued):
4. Was the ICP interference check sample analyzed at the contract specified
frequency?
Yes No
Comments:
5. Were the ICP interference check sample results within the control limit
of +:w-20% of the mean value?
Y e� No
If "No", note analytes
DATA VALIDATION - METALS
Site Name: ,-Sou-4-10(1 LU41 Laboratory Name: Fi) L /r Ci)ikkJfj
Rev i ewer:- Oate of Review: 9
i
VIII. Laboratory Control Sample Analysis
1. Was a laboratory control sample analyzed at the contract required
frequency?
Yes No
Comments-
2. Were the perecent recoveries within the control limits of 80-120% (except
for Ag and Sb) for each analyte?
• Yes No
._.
Comments
1
DATA VALIDATION - METALS
Site Name: �C'c�I;lcl(J 4C<J'1([ jaboratory Name:
Reviewer: ��C1Lcc� �,,,��a,l Date of Review:
IX. Furnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
1. Were duplicate injections performed for all analytes (except for the
Method of Standard Addition CMSA) which requires single injections
only)?
Ees NO
Comments:
2. Where the concentrations were above the CROL, did the two runs agree
within 20% of the relative standard deviations for ach anal rte?
L'Yes No E g L_ 1,
If "No", note analytes = �y "L�'
and check to see if the ana ytes were run again. it readings are sti
outside the control limits, all data associated with that analysis should
have been flagged with an "M'.
3. Did the preparation blank analysis produce spike recoveries of 85-115x?
Yes No
Comments 1 /
I
�.r
DATA VALIDATION - METALS
Site Nam.�7C(���'��� �� � Laboratory Name:
Reviewer: ( f) f CcZ Date of Review: S
IX. Furnace Atomic Absorption Analysis (continued):
4. Were analysis (post digest) spikes performed on all required samples and
concentr n levels (2x CROL)?
Y No
Comments
5. For those samples whose initial spike recovery was less than 40%, was
sample dilutin and respiking performed?
Yes No
Comments ! re
6. Was the MSA performed at the contract specified frequency and did it
follow the contract specified criteria?
Yes No
Comments
A/0,i
)62 awl /J
i
DATA VALIDATION - .METALS
Si to Name: �c L-t-h� c, ��� .LCtOdP' laboratory Name: � tC�l� 7 �� /i c i?�yf- rt0'
Reviewer: Date of Review:
Associated Samples: 73MLU 0 G(•O A LU l , w2S-,0 >uDCt0
til W (c bG �� �L� C LU S, �-1 �o 10 C- Lo j cLt U) 7 0 G �z' , tit �.' "7 S 6 �.L�1 roc �� C c �C c, C C Z
II. Initial Calibration kl.'C"cam
1. Were all initial instrument calibrations performed?
Yes No
Comments:
2. Were the initial calibration verification standards analyzed at the
contract � cified frequency?
Yes ' No
Comments:
3. Were the initial calibration results within the control limits listed
below?
For tin and mercury: 80-120% of the true value
For all other metals: 90-110% of the true value
E
No
If "No", note analytes
DATA VALIDATION - METALS
Site Name: C �Cl t044�t �1 Laboratory Name: �!�( S� Efj� Ire E LLL' � j
Reviewer: • _ LDate of Review:�-
Associated Samples: F10-134 H W Iii 6 -CU Ddu= iS6W ktLC :)S6(U u.'G 0 GCL' ki ti:p;/ -w
k1UC-7S6c.'L' PU CCI PLCCCZ��ctCCZ
III. Continuing Calibration
1. Were the continuing calibration verification standards analyzed at the
contract specified frequency?
Yes No
Comments:
2. Were the continuing calibration results within the control limits listed
below?
For tin and mercury: 80-120% of the true value
For all other metals: 90-110% of the true value
Y e� No
If "No", note analytes
I
DATA VALIDATION - METALS
S ; :e Name:c 16( �t 11 Laboratory Name: I�-� K S+ c�'�� �4 Ci arLO&6(�
Reviewer: • ( c, � �cd IDate of Review: (C :�
IY. Blank Summary
A. Method Blanks
1. Was a method blank prepared and analyzed at the contract specified
frequency?
Yes No
2. Were all the analytes below the CROL in the method blank?
Yes No
Comments
Ba Calibration Blanks
1. Were all initial and continuing calibration blanks analyzed at the
contracnes
ified frequency?
No
2. Were all the analytes below the CROL in all the calibration blanks?
Yes No
Comments:
DATA VALIDATION - METALS
Site Name: C; ,; i�clCl ���1<<�1 l f Laboratory Name:
Reviewer: Date of Review:
eT
Vi. Matrix Spike Analysis
1. Was a matrix spike prepared and analyzed at the contract specified
frequency?
Y No
y/
Comments:
2. Were the matrix spike recovereis within the contract specified control
limits (75-125x)?
Yes
If "Nonote analytes fro S
! 31. S ct yt C) �(Q 1. (o 0/0 rCS pe- llj 'f • tom `fh e 5e S a m
• f' control limits.
Data should have been flagged with N for analytes out o
99
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of
four or more, no flag is required. %
1 r on , ea Cj aw d 94a ttj eccc.¢ ii ,0 110 u C1 fie. C�c �,e� < ka L6
o�
DATA VALIDATION -METALS
`' , ( ( Laboratory Name: ``-g �f s�
Si.e Name:-�-���i-i-,� � Z��� i1 y I , O�. ly (-L'101e�•Jzd
Rev iewer: (C'c (-LCir-Date of Review:ic -2�
J
V. Duplicate Analysis
1. Was a duplicate prepared and analyzed at the contract specified
frequency?
Yes No
Comments:
2. Were control limits for the relative percent differences (RPO) met for
each analyte?
` Yes No
ts: Cern fyo i' is ca ^(�• ��"
For sample values >5 times the CRDL, the RPO control limit is ±20X.
For sample values <5 times the CRDL, the RPO control limit is ±CRDL.
If sample results were outside of the control limits, all data associated
with that duplicate sample should have been flagged with a
Site Name
Reviewer:
DATA VALIDATION - METALS
Laboratory Name: ku � -t t 3' yC.F6( Zt-C
Date of Review: 162
VII. ICP Interference Check Sample Summary
1. Was the ICP serial dilution analyzed at the contract specified
frequency?
Y s No
Comments:
2. Were the serial dilution differences within the contract specified
limits of +:w -10X?
Yes No
3. Was the ICP CROL check standard analyzed at the contract specified
frequency for the analytes required?
Yes/ No
Comments
DATA VALIDATION - METALS
Site Name: _-X-( t 4) C, LJ LCwA All aboratary Name: � f C O4q I, n,e?
Reviewer:N(iDate of Review: i G
VII. ICP Interference Check Sample Summary (continued):
4. Was the ICP interference check sample analyzed at the contract specified
frequency?
Yes No -
Comments:
5. Were the ICP interference check sample results within the control limit
of +:x-20% of the mean value?
Yes - No
If "No", note analytes
DATA VALIDATION - METALS
Site Name: ��t�r: �C� ��►�C��I ( I Laboratory Name: 41e -d
Reviewer: ti - l.L Date of Review: i
YIN. Laboratory Control Sample Analysis
1. Was a laboratory control sample analyzed at the contract required
frequency?
(,Yes ; No
Comments:
2. Were the perecent recoveries within the control limits of 80-120% (except
for Ag and Sb) for each analyte?
Y s No
Comments
DATA VALIDATION - METALS
Site Name: Sc- L�� CJ )at�� J/ Laboratory Name: UJ �{ FOS -•l I
Reviewer: ( t L Date of Review: (%
IX. Furnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
1. Were duplicate injections performed for all analytes (except for the
Methoa of Standard Addition CMSA] which requires single injections
only)?
Yes No
Comments:
2. Where the concentrations were above the CROL, did the two runs agree
within 20% of the relative standard deviations for each analyte?
Y es_)No
If "No", note analytes
and check to see if the analytes were run again. If readings are stiJT—
outside the control limits, all data associated with that analysis should
have been flagged with an "M".
3. Did the preparation blank analysis produce spike recoveries of 85-115x?
Yes No
Comments
Pr
/_° n
DATA VALIDATION - METALS
Site Name: c 'Laboratory Name: ��j �2��- ��CVCtir-Krxkf
reviewer: Qtl.lk-OA �ir�le�CUCCLIDate of Review:—[0/3
IX. Furnace Atomic Absorption Analysis (continued):
4, Were analysis (post digest) spikes performed on all required samples and
concentration levels (2x CROL)?
Yes,, No
Comments
S. For those samples whose initial spike recovery was less than 40%, was
sample dilutin and respiking performed?
Yes No
6. Was the MSA performed at the contract specified frequency and did it
follow the contract specified criteria?
Yes No
DATA VALIDATION - METALS
Site Name: �c�L,Clc1. LCUICO-, �I Laboratory Name: Pk 1 S� �G,I)��Lc��z�(
Reviewer: l CSC ICLt-CLL Date of Review: ( (.%���� -D"
Associated Samples:
II. Initial Calibration
1. Were all initial instrument calibrations performed?
-' 1
Yes No
Comments:
2. Were the initial calibration verification standards analyzed at the
contract _s eC}ified frequency?
Yes / No
Comments:
3. Were the initial calibration results within the control limits listed
below?
For tin and mercury: 80-120% of the true value
For all other metals: 90-110% of the true value
Yes, No
If "Nou, note analytes
DATA VALIDATION - METALS
1
Site Name: '50t -IJ InG%�� )—tLy\,r Laboratory Name:
��4joc- _fJL ir"rrl N lty
Reviewer: E Date of Review: ((D %,,2Iq L _
Associated Samples: I� �,� �I), �1 ��i�U kiU)4-S.
III. Continuing Calibration
1. Were the continuing calibration verification standards analyzed at the
contract specified frequency?
Ye `' No
Comments:
2. Were the continuing calibration results within the control limits listed
below?
For tin and mercury: 80-120% of the true value
For all other metals: 90-110% of the true value
Yes No
If "No", note analytes
DATA VALIDATION - METALS
S t e Name: L C C �-� Laboratory Name: �u �y11' I�'cn�lu'
t
aev iewer:U(IA,_(-Ck-- �, 1\ �� L Date of Review: C`
IY. 31ank Summary
A. Method Blanks
1. Was a method blank prepared and analyzed at the contract specified
frequency?
Y eT ! No
2. Were all the analytes below the CROL in the method blank?
Yes No
Comments:
S. Calibration Blanks
1. Were all initial and continuing calibration blanks analyzed at the
contract specified frequency?
:Des No '
2. Were all the analytes below the CROL in all the calibration blanks?
`,,Yes No
Comments:
M
DATA VALIDATION - ,METALS
f n
Si:e Name:�-i 1( Laboratory Name: �,`I }�5¢ Cell, 4C�t11V6_
Re. i ewer :Date of Review: n
V. Duplicate Analysis
1. Was a duplicate prepared and analyzed at the contract specified
frequenc 7
Yes No
Comments:
2. Were control limits for the relative percent differences (RPO) met for
each analyte?
Yes No
Comnents:
For sample values >5 times the CROL, the RPD control limit is t20x.
For sample values <5 times the CROL, the RPD control limit is ±CROL.
If sample results were outside of the control limits, all data associated
with that duplicate sample should have been flagged with a .
DATA VALIDATION - METALS
S i to Name: Laboratory Name: -A)U �Sf �n� ��cr�6YLJltltt�
Reviewer: Date of Review: �o"J
Vi. Matrix Spike Analysis
1. Was a matrix spike prepared and analyzed at the contract specified
frequency?
CYe No
Comments:
2. Were the matrix spike recovereis within the contract specified control
limits (75-125X)?
Yes No
If "No", note analytes 1 rO n Ccod Lr
5Pu4ced Lgmly'aH cl� fr 0
Data should have been flagged with 1°N" for analytes out of control limits.
If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of
four or more, no flag is required.
DATA VALIDATION - 'KETALS
Site Name: c, �: Laboratory Name: ,rp �l lli, 1021'!%
Reviewer: Date of Review:
VII. ICP Interference Check Sample Summary
I. Was the ICP serial dilution analyzed at the contract specified
frequency?
es No
Comments:
2. Were the serial dilution differences within the contract specified
limits of +:w-I®X?
Yes CNo
Comments _
f
3. Was the ICP CRDI check standard analyzed at the contract specified
frequency for the analytes required?
Yew No
Comments
DATA VALIDATION - METALS
Site Name:���I` C'(Cj Z-aY%j4 01 Laboratory Name: Sf �rl 6 ctj
Reviewer: Date of Review: 9
VII. ICP Interference Check Sample Summary (continued):
4. Was the ICP interference check sample analyzed at the contract specified
frequency?
Yes No
Comments:
5. Were the ICP interference check sample results within the control limit
of +:w-20% of the mean value?
Yes No
If "No", note analytes
DATA VALIDATION - METALS
Site Name: SCS 'Nnr'.lC( LQV)� Ci 1I Laboratory Name: U f f5� ��� L�� rc�'1`h eriKeo
Reviewer: r t,t, Date of Review: r 2 9�
VIII. Laboratory Control Sample Analysis
1. Was a laboratory control sample analyzed at the contract required
frequency?
�Yes No
Comments:
2. Were the perecent recoveries within the control limits of 80-120% (except
for Ag and Sb) for each analyte?
Yes No
Comments
DATA VALIDATION - METALS
G
Site Name: � A Laboratory Name:
Reviewer: z, Date of Review:
IX. Furnace Atomic Absorption Analysis
1. Were duplicate injections performed for all analytes (except for the
Method of Standard Addition CMSA] which requires single injections
only)?
Yes No
Comments:
2. Where the concentrations were above the CROL, did the two runs agree
within 29%—ef the relative standard deviations for each analyte?
Yes No
If "No", note analytes
and check to see if the analytes were run again. If readings are still
outside the control limits, all data associated with that analysis should
have been flagged with an "M".
3. Did the preparation blank analysis produce spike recoveries of 85-115X?
Yes No
Comments � 1 _ n
#$ (ter11nn I rl k --r i'2 f/t N V uocej f n
Site Name
Reviewer:
DATA VALIDATION - METALS
aboratory Name: 10L
ate of Review:
IX. Furnace Atomic Absorption Analysis (continued):
4. Were analysis (post digest) spikes performed on all required samples and
concentration levels (2x CROL)?
Yes No
Comments\.
5. For those samples whose initial spike recovery was less than 40%, was
sample dilutin and respiking performed?
Yes No
6. Was the MSA performed at the contract specified frequency and did it
follow the contract specified criteria?
Yes No