Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
One-Mile Radius Visibility Study - 01/2015
PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY Mattituck Fire District PO Box 6.66 Mottituck, New York 11952 '� :. IF <' i: ;�� 100 -Motor Parkway, Suite 135: Hauppauge, NY i 1788. January 2015 % 51 1. R °gi vhb Table of Contents Introduction................................................................................................................................................1 Methodology.............................................................................................................................................. 7 1 -Mile Radius Visibility Results.................................................................................................................. 9 PhotographicSimulation Analysis...........................................................................................................11 Findingsand Conclusions........................................................................................................................18 List of Figures Figure1—Site Location Map.....................................................................................................................3 Figure2 — Site Plan...................................................................................................................................4 Figure3 — Elevations.................................................................................................................................5 Figure 4 - Compound Plan (Partial Roof Plan).........................................................................................6 Figure5 — One -Mile Radius Map...............................................................................................................8 Figure 6 — Photograph Location Map......................................................................................................12 List of Appendices Appendix A — One -Mile Radius Visibility and Photograph Location Map and One -Mile Radius Visibility Photographs Appendix B — Visual Analysis (Photographic Simulations) by Creative Visuals, Inc. n �W�ill/• SII '�rhb Introduction A one -mile radius visibility study was performed for the proposed communications facility upgrade on the Mattituck Fire District property, located at 1000 Pike Street in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York (see Figure 1). The subject property is designated on the Suffolk County Tax Map as District 1000 — Section 140.00 — Block 03.00 — Lot 011.001. The proposed action involves the upgrade of the Mattituck Fire District's existing communications facility. Specifically, the Fire District intends to remove an existing 84.5 -foot -tall wooden pole with whip antennas thereon and replace it with a 120 -foot - tall blue/gray stealth unipole and associated equipment (Figure 2). The proposed unipole would support multiple Fire District whip antennas at various heights, the uppermost of which would reach a top height of 132 -feet -6± -inches above grade level (agl) (Figure 3). In addition, a mesa span cabinet and a transformer would be installed at ground level, proximate to the base of the proposed unipole. The proposed stealth unipole would also facilitate future collocation, as it would be able to conceal the antennas of multiple wireless service providers within. Associated rooftop equipment of future wireless communications providers would be situated on two proposed steel platforms measuring 336 and 184 square feet, behind screening enclosures designed to match the building fagade (Figure 4). The proposed screening enclosures for future wireless communications rooftop equipment would extend to a height of 31 -feet -2± -inches agl, which is approximately nine feet higher than the existing building parapet (Figure 3). Additionally, a natural gas powered generator (associated with future collocation) could be located upon the building rooftop proximate to the proposed equipment platforms. At the request of the applicant, VHB Engineering, Surveying and Landscape Architecture, P.C. (VHB) performed a one -mile radius visibility study on April 3, 2014, between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m., to evaluate where, within a one - mile radius of the site location, the proposed communications facility would be visible. To facilitate this evaluation, a crane was positioned proximate to the location of the proposed communications facility (seven± feet to the southeast of the location of the proposed unipole) with the boom extended to a height of 120± feet agl, with red flags affixed thereto to facilitate visibility. �1 1 Introduction vhb Land uses in the immediate area surrounding the proposed facility (within the one - mile radius) are mixed, with municipal, commercial, residential, industrial, transportation, educational, agricultural, religious institution, recreational, and open space uses. Topography in the surrounding area (within the one -mile radius) is relatively flat, without significant changes in elevation. Elevations in the surrounding area range from approximately zero feet to 50 feet above mean sea level (amsl). The proposed facility location is at approximately ten± feet amsl. Elevations generally are highest in the northern and western portions of the one -mile radius, in the vicinity of Mattituck Creek. The most significant elevation changes occur northwest of the proposed facility location, on the east side of Mattituck Creek, with elevations increasing from zero± feet amsl to 50± feet amsl over a distance of approximately 0.20 mile. 0 2 Introduction ZONING REQUIREMENTS ZONE REGULATIONS FOR THE 70%W OF S01117HMID ONE: HB HAMLET BUSINESS BLOCK: 03 LOT:11.1 DIMENSIONAL REGULATIONS REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED MINIMUM LOT AREA: 459 ACRES 59,187 SQFT NO CHANGE BOONTON, NJ 07005 1.36 ACRES MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 60 FEET ±298' NO CHANGE MINIMUM LOT DEPTH: 100 FEET ±210' NO CHANGE MINIMUM FRONT YARD: 15 FEET 20 FEET 96'-3" MINIMUM SIDE YARD: 10 FEET - EAST 175'-5" OHIO 9510925 FL AR0014044 PA RA403281 WEST 122'-0" INIMUM REAR YARD: 25 FEET ±90 FEET 1 114'-6" MAXIMUM HEIGHT: 35 FEET 44 FEET 120 FEET TOP OF POLE NDSCAPE AREA: 25 7275 NO CHANGE UILDING HEIGHT 35 FEET 44 FEET NO CHANGE UMBER OF STORIES 2 STORIES 2 STORIES NO CHANGE ISTANCE BETWEEN ROPOSED FACILITY ND NEAREST FSIDFNQF 124.75' (STANCE BETWEEN ]STANCE ROPOSED FACILITY 80'-5"± ND NEAREST PROP. LINE STANCE ETWEE 121'-10"± BLDG. ONE ROPOSED FACILITY AND 1'-6"± BLDG. TWO LL OTHER STRUCTURES 33'-O"± BLDG. THREE N PROPERTY 119'-4"± FLAGPOLE DISTANCE BETWEEN 96'-3"± ROPOSED FACILITY AND 175'-5"± GADS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY DRIVEWAYS I\ FLAGPOLE G� �s EXIS \ , FD G� ® 0 E 1 s° (TYP.)\ FD BLDG ® EXISTING REEt (TYP•) FALL ZONE DELINEATION \ (200) PROJECT 1 SITE PLAN NORTH SCALE: 1"= 50'-0" .5' 50' 100' A3 EXISTING FIRE STATION PROP6SED FUTURE C • RIER EQUIPMENT AREAS 1'= 50'-0" // ,/1'\ V-INGRESS/EGRESS Musciano, ISA Architect TION�•��p'3 E '(� Y� 611 MAIN STREET ® 2ND FLOOR BOONTON, NJ 07005 TELEPHONE (973) 538-3815 FAX 973-538-4095 IA RA,- PP 6 MI 4 x ,01 7 MN148411 �F MO A2009005517 804 NV 5015 T 7547 NC 9671 DC ARC6052 OHIO 9510925 FL AR0014044 PA RA403281 GA RA 012998 RI 2030 IL RA 001.020501 SC 8651 KS 5073 TEXAS 15417 LA 5690 UT 8470051-0301 MD 11039 VT 2529 MA 1 0131 VA 0401008254 NJ PLANNER 4351 CONSULTANTS mm INGRESS/EGRESS,,MUSCLM \ °° EXISTING ��(2) 4" COND (1 Lam% DRYWELL 'A AND 1 8 09.01.14 FOR HUNG � (TYp,) ® PRIMARY) 7 04.15.14 FOR RUNG °oma• j 1 6 03.21.14 FOR REVIEW 5 03.17.14 FOR REVIEW (IISTtN \� ,' 4 02.19.14 FOR REVIEW r7NlcanoN uNfPOLE A ING.� 3 11.20.13 FOR REVIEW CE EXISTING` �LT 1NIP%E- 2�0`O" �o/ 2 11.05.13 FOR REVIEW y 1 08.26.13 FOR REVIEW '75' \ ® ND_ DATE' SUBMISSIONS BI' PA TJ 'AL APPROVALS: '0 �E j/. E � \ v S 26°42'20 E 39.70' 11 / \ ® \ CLIENT /PROJECT: / Efli�e�®q�eas. 7141 MATTITUICK FIRE DEPARTMENT 110, l< — - 1000 PIKE STREET MATTTUCK, NY 11952 DATE: PROJECT N0. \ 08.26.13 7141 / \ THIS DESIGN IS COPYRIGHTED AND DRAWING NO. THE UN ED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNAUT STATES OF AMERICA. DANYOC UNAUIH HOU USE OF THE CONSENT OF WRHOUf WRnn/MUS I PROMSSI . HERBSf/MUSCUJJO IS / Figure 2 e pg. 4 2013 0 MATTITUCK FIRE DISTRICT SINCLAIR-SC329-HF2SNF(D00-GO6) CA 126' -7 - FREQUENCY OF TRANSMISSION -(MHz) 455 LFORMATION CONTAINED ON PROPOSED 36" DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN DIAMETER AT TOP I FROM 1) A SKETCH FOR OF POLE IIUCK FIRE DISTRICT' BY *RNACCHIA OF 'SCINETX', I) DRAWINGS ENTITLED 'OSED ADDITION & ATIONS TO THE MATTITUCK LO,L,_ PROPOSED 120' NOH UNPOLEEINSTALLATIONOF ALL COLOR OF POLE TO BE COMMUNICARDNEQUIPMENT BLUE/GRAY AS PER TOYN OF UBJECT 10 STRUCTURAL SOUTHOLD CODE SECTION FICATION 280-721(7) MATTITUCK FIRE DISTRICT RFS -201-7N (ONE ANTENNA) CA 64.7' FREQUENCY OF TRANSMISSION -(MHz) 450-460 MHz - .) CA 126'-7° FREQUENCY OF TRANSMISSION -(MHz) 483 VERRON WIRELESS INSTALLATION AMPHENOL CWWX063X25XOD tONE ANT.T CA 115' FREQUENCY OF TRANSMISSION -(MHz) 777-797 AMPHENOL CWWX063X25X00 (ONE ANT) CA 115' FREQUENCY OF TRANSMISSION-(MH4 1970-1990 AMPHENOL CWWX063X25XOD (ONE ANT.) CA 115' FREQUENCY OF TRANSMISSION -(MHz) MIG -2130 \FTI " WIRELESS B/ KS R OC- /� fFUTURE ANTENNA MODEL CA 105' & 95' / FREQUENCY OF TRANSMISSION -(MHz) 734-740/740-746 FU ONE WIRELESS A "LOCK- CELLULAR FUTURE ANTENNA MODEL C/L 105 & 95' FREQUENCY OF TRANSMSSION-(MHz) 869.04-879.99/890.01-691.48 FUTURE WIRELESS A-4IE-1 BLOCKS- PCS FUTURE ANTENNA MODEL CA 105 & 95' FREQUENCY OF TRANSMISSION- (MHz) 1930-1945/1985-1970 FREQUENCY OF 68.6' FREQUENCY OF TRANSMISSION -(MHz) 155MHz I Ip ill AMATIITUCK FIRE DISTRICT COMMANDER -1142-20N (ONE ANTENNA) C/L 48.8' T T 1 LAIRD TECH. Y(B) 4608 (TWD ANTENNAS) CA 30' ��gg ���� gg,gg,,77,,,,__�Tqq��FRREQUENCY OF TRANSMISSION-(MHz)46.34-46.46 ; i FREQUENCY OF TRANSMISSION -(MHz) 483,486 MHz OFOF ROOF�RID(,E I \ T � FUTURE CARRIER EQUIPMENT ON 1 1 I I PROPOSEDSMEI. PLATFORM W/ SCIMEN DOS TING FIRE 1 /� 1_-___ III 1 ENCLOSURE (PROPOSED FUTURE CARRIER STATION Jam} I EQUIPMENT PLATFORM BEYOND) (NC) diln� M.- T, ,—.soon.■■■■.■�i■onui■■■ ■ ■.■.-.■-.■ . n I so.on.■...—■.on '1111 9nni, �.■.■..■.ii..■n.�■..■..■. ■■■■■■.. 1 ELEVATION A SCALE: 1/16"= 1'-0" 0 8' 16' 32' 64' 1/16"=1'-0" FREQUENCY OF TRi NSMISSION -(MHz) 483 VER ZON WIRELESS INSTALLATION AMPHENOL CWWXOBMMXODONE ANT. C 115 FREQUENCY OF TRANSMg90N-(MHz) 777-797 AMPHENOL CWWX06M=00 (ONE ANT.) CA 115 FREQUENCY OF TRANSMISSION -(MHz) 1970-1890 AMPNENOL CW WXOSMMXOO (ONE ANT.) CA 115' FREQUENCY OF TRANSMISSION -(MHz) 2110-2130 FUTURE WIRam R/C BLOCX9-LTE FUTURE ANTENNA MODEL C/L FREQUENCY OF TRANSMISSION -(MHz) 734-740/74o-746 \ FIlII1RE WH2FILCC A BLOCK- fill-I1LAR FUTURE ANTENNA MODEL C/L 105' & 95' FREQUENCY OF TRANSMISSION -(MHz) 868.01-879.88/880.01-691.48 FUTURE MME ECC A -3/A -4/E-1 "LOCKS- PCS FUTURE ANTENNA MODEL CA 105' & 95' FREQUENCY OF TRANSMISSION- (MHz) 193G-IM/1965-1970 MATTITUCK FIRE DISTRICT COMMANDER-1142-2CN ONE ANTENNA C 66.a' --- FREQUENCY OF TRANSMISSION -(MHz) 48.34-48.48 LAIRD TECH. Y(B) 4508 (TWD ANTENNAS) C/L 30' FREQUENCY OF TRANSMISSION -(MHz) 483,488 MHz FUTURE CARRIER EQUIPMENT ON PROPOSED STEEL PLATFORM W/ SCfiEEN ENCLOSURE (PROPOSED FUTURE CARRIER EQUIPMENT PLATFORM BEYOND) (NIC) 2 ELEVATION B SCALE: 1/16"= 1'-0" M 0 8' 16' 32' 64' MATTITUCK FIRE DISTRICT SINCLAIR-SC329-HF2SNF(D00-GOB) CA 126'-7" FREQUENCY OF TRANSMISSION -(MHz) 465 PROPOSED 36` DIAMETER AT TOP OF POLE PROPOSED 12V HIGH UNPOLE COLOR OF POLE TO BE BLUE GRAY AS PER TOWN OF OLD CODE SECTION 280-72A(7) -MATTITUCK FIRE DISTRICT l RFS -201-7N (ONE ANTENNA) CASC7' FREQUENCY OF TRANSMISSION-6ft) 450-460 MHz MATRTUCK FIRE DISTRICT RFS-SA7010-2 ONE ANTENNA EX—a-29' FREQUENCY OF TRANSMISSION -(MHz) 15SMHz fd4 MATTITUCK RRF DISTRICT COMMANDER -1142-20N (ONE ANTENNA) CA. 46.8' FREQUENCY OF TRANSVJSSION-(MHz)4&34-48.46 Boom■■■ !"'�-'PARCMW DIAMETER �J T OF POLE ■■■ ■n, ii■ n■; Figure 3 - pg. 5 uscian®, RA 09.01.14 IFOR FILING Architect ® 611 MAIN STREET O 2ND FLOOR 03.17.14 FOR REVIEW BOONTON, NJ 07005 02.19.14 FOR REVIEW HONE (973) 538-3815 11.20.13 FOR REVIEW FAX• 973-538-4095 Y A, PP ani 0 MI 1301045424 MN 48411 SUBMISSIONS MO A2009005517 401804 NV 5015 CT 7547 NC 9671 DC ARC6052 OHIO 9510925 FL AR0014044 PA RA403281 GA RA 012998 RI 2030 IL RA 001.020501 SC 8651 KS 5073 TEAS 15417 LA 5690 UT 8470051-0301 MD 11039 VT 2529 MA 10131 VA 0401008254 NJ PLANNER 4351 CONSULTANTS 8 09.01.14 IFOR FILING 7 04.15.14 FOR FILING 6 03.21.14 FOR REVIEW 5 03.17.14 FOR REVIEW 4 02.19.14 FOR REVIEW 3 11.20.13 FOR REVIEW 2 111.05.13 IFOR REVIEW 1 108.26.13 IFOR REVIEW U.I� �- SUBMISSIONS FIRE APPROVALS: CLIENT / PROJECT. EYite�®uveas, I� 7141 MATTITUCK FIRE DEPARTMENT 1000 PIKE STREET MATTITUCK, NY 11952 DATE. 08.26.13 PROJECT NO, 7141 THIS DESIGN IS COPYRIGHTED AND DRAWING NO, PROTECTED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF A1. MWA. ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THE CONSENT FKERWITHOUT /UUSWRnTECI COISQRf OF I¢'RE1.ST/YUSCVND 19A-03 PROI1 wm. 2013 FA EXISTING FIRE STATION O O / EXISTING-/ �JG" �0 DRIVEWAY FO 0P FOS P� 0 O� FUTURE CARRIER EQUIPMENT CABINETS ON PROPOSED FUTURE 12X28 STEEL \ PLATFORM W/ `SCREEN ENCLOSURE (NIC) ZZ/ EXISTING HVAC, TYP. O CARRIER NATURAL GAS GENERATOR EXISTING VENT HOOD, TYP. O PROPOSED CARRIER EQUIPMENT CABINETS ON PROPOSED FUTURE \ 184 S.F. STEEL PLATFORM W/ SCREEN ENCLOSURE (NIC) o PROJECT COMPOUND PLAN NORTH 1 SCALE: 1/16"= 1'=0" r EXISTING FIRE STATION ASSEMBLY - BY PP DTTHERS PROeOSED 120' MI 1301045424 TELECOMMUNICATION MN 48411 UNIPOLE TO \\ REPLACE,,EXISTING \ WOOD UNI LE NC 9671 ZMETERS PROPOSED MESA AND Go SPAN CABINET 0 DISCONNECTS ON UNISTRUT FRAME PROPOSED LIPA 0 TRANFORMER 0 n 0 8' 16' 32' 64' 1/1 6`_— l'— 0" Figure 4 - pg. 6 Musciano, RA Architect chi 611 MAIN STREET �. 2ND FLOOR BOONTON. NJ 07005 ` HONE (973) 538-3815 ��fUSC N RA, PP .5/ �� j MI 1301045424 ��+ MN 48411 TM DESIGN IS COFYRIGHTED MID MO A2009005517 4 NV 5015 CT 7547 NC 9671 DC ARC6052 OHIO 9510925 FL AR0014044 PA RA403281 GA RA 012998 RI 2030 IL RA 001.020501 SC 8651 KS 5073 TEXAS 15417 LA 5690 UT 8470051-0301 MD 11039 VT 2529 MA 10131 VA 0401008254 NJ PLANNER 4351 CONSULTANTS 8 09.01.14 IFOR FILING 7 04.15.14 FOR FILING 6 03.21.14 FOR REVIEW 5 03.17.14 FOR REVIEW 4 02.19.14 FOR REVIEW 3 11.21.13 FOR REVIEW 2 11.05.13 FOR REVIEW 1 08.26.13 FOR REVIEW NO.: DAME: SUBMISSIONS APPROVALS: CLIENT / PROJECT. ElitAowers, Ts 7141 MATTITUCK FIRE DEPARTMENT 1000 PIKE STREET MATTITUCK, NY 11952 DATE PROJECT NO. 08.26.13 7141 TM DESIGN IS COFYRIGHTED MID DRAWING NO. PROTECTED UNDER THE LAWS OF TME UNITED STATES OF AWRICA ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THE DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF HERBST/MUSCWJO IS 2 PROHIBITED. 2013 Ah vhb i Methodology Four representatives of VHB, along with staff from Creative Visuals, Inc., made an on-site visit to obtain familiarity with the site and the surrounding area. A crane was positioned proximate to the location of the proposed communications facility (approximately seven feet from the proposed location), and the top of the crane was set at 120± feet agl (to represent the height of the proposed stealth unipole). The top of the crane provided a reference point, via red flags attached thereto, for the photographs that were taken as part of this one -mile radius visibility study. Digital photographs were taken by two representatives of VHB. Photographs were taken from an approximate height of five feet above street level. This height represents an average between a driver -eye -level and a pedestrian -eye -level. These photographs were taken on April 3, 2014, between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. The conditions were clear to partly cloudy, with deciduous leaves off of the trees. A one -mile radius was plotted onto a DeLorme Street Map (see Figure 5). Every public roadway within a one -mile radius was driven by car., Observations were made along all streets within this radius, and, if the crane could be seen at an intersection, a photograph was taken. Additional photographs were taken at non - intersection locations where appropriate. The data collected during the visual study was overlain onto a base aerial photograph of the one -mile radius area in order to illustrate those areas from which the proposed facility would be visible or partially visible (see annexed One -Mile Radius Visibility and Photograph Location Map in Appendix A). The results of these observations revealed that the proposed facility would be visible and partially visible within the immediate surrounding area (0.3± mile), with limited visibility due to local topography and the presence of intervening mature vegetation and existing structures within the one -mile radius. V Only publicly -accessible roadways were traversed. Private roadways were not accessed. 7 Methodology Figure 5 — One -Mile Radius Map SITE NAME: Proposed Communications Facility Upgrade LOCATION: 1000 Pike Street CITY, STATE, ZIP: Mattituck, New York 11952 SCALE: Not to Scale SOURCE: DeLorme Street Atlas USA, 2010 e mwa-vh One -Mile Radius Visibility Results Twenty-seven (27) color digital photographs are included herein. These photographs were primarily taken from roadway intersections where the crane was, at least, partially visible. Some photographs from non -intersection locations are also included in this report. As the crane may be difficult to view in some of the photographs, arrows have been added to indicate its location. The following is a list of the photograph locations from which the crane could be seen, numbered to correspond with the One -Mile Radius Visibility and Photograph Location Map in Appendix A: 1. From the intersection of Wickham Avenue and Middle Road: 2. From the intersection of Freeman Road and Wickham Avenue (partial); 3. From the intersection of Farmer Road and Wickham Avenue (partial); 4. From the intersection of Bayer Road and Wickham Avenue (partial); 5. From the intersection of Wickham Avenue and Grand Avenue (partial); 6. From Wickham Avenue, near the edge of the one -mile radius (partial); 7. From the intersection of Mary's Road and Middle Road; 8. From the intersection of Brower Road and Grand Avenue (partial); 9. From the intersection of Maiden Lane and Middle Road (partial); 10. From the intersection of Love Lane and the Long Island Rail Road (existing pole to be removed is visible); 11. From the intersection of Love Lane and Middle Road (partial); 12. From the intersection of Westphalia Avenue and the Long Island Rail Road; 13. From the intersection of Pike Street and Wickham Avenue (existing pole to be removed is visible); 14. From the intersection of Mary's Road and Pike Street (partial); 15. From the intersection of Hill Street and Wickham Avenue (existing pole to be removed is visible); 16. From the northwest corner of Village Lane (partial); 17. From near the middle of Mill Lane (partial); 18. From near the intersection of Airway Drive and New Suffolk Avenue (partial); 19. From New Suffolk Avenue, south of Marratooka Pond (partial); 20. From the intersection of Reeve Avenue and Main Road (partial); 9 One -Mile Radius Visibility Results .Ask 000 ®a°i vhb • 21. From the intersection of Love Lane and Pike Street (existing pole to be removed is visible); 22. From the intersection of Westphalia Avenue and Pike Street (partial); 23. From the intersection of Pacific Street and Sound Avenue (partial); 24. From near the middle of Rochelle Place (partial); 25. From the intersection of Main Road and New Suffolk Avenue (partial); 26. From the intersection of Main Road and Sound Avenue (partial); 27. From the intersection of Main Road and'Wickham Avenue (partial). Photograph locations for the above -listed photographs are identified on the One -Mile Radius Visibility and Photograph Location Map included in Appendix A. Areas shaded red on the One -Mile Radius Visibility and Photograph Location Map indicate areas of visibility. Those areas with intermittent visibility or visibility amongst deciduous vegetation and other visual obstructions (i.e. existing structures) are indicated as partially visible on the One -Mile Radius Visibility and Photograph Location Map in blue. Private roads, which were not travelled, are indicated by green shading. The visibility of the proposed stealth unipole would be limited to within approximately 0.3 -mile of the subject site, with very limited visibility beyond that distance within the one -mile radius. The greatest visibility of the proposed facility would be along portions of Pike Street, Wickham Avenue, Main Road, Middle Road, Love Lane, Westphalia Avenue, and Hill Street (Photographs 1, 10, 12-13,15 and 21). Visibility of the proposed facility would diminish rapidly due to intervening vegetation, existing structures and surrounding topography, as distance from the subject site increases in all directions. It should be noted that the existing pole (to be removed) on the subject property can be seen in Photographs 10, 13,15 and 21. In addition, there would be partial visibility of the proposed stealth unipole from locations in all directions (Photographs 2-9, 11, 14, 16-20, and 22-27). However, the visibility of the proposed facility would be largely obscured by seasonal vegetation. All additional areas within the one -mile radius had no visibility due to intervening vegetation, existing structures and topography. As indicated above, and as depicted on the One -Mile Radius Visibility and Photograph Location Map in Appendix A, there would be limited overall visibility of the proposed facility within the one -mile radius. Additionally, this study was done during the "leaf -off" season and, thus, depicts a worst-case visibility scenario. It is anticipated that during the growing season, the proposed facility would be obscured from view from many of the locations that were identified as having partial visibility. Finally, the applicant has designed its proposed facility such that it would conceal the proposed antennas within a stealth unipole, helping to mitigate potential visual impacts associated with the proposed action. 10 One -Mile Radius Visibility Results 000 Vhb Photographic Simulation Analysis Photographic Simulation Methodology Creative Visuals, Inc. prepared photographic simulations of the proposed communications facility. On April 3, 2014, Creative Visuals, Inc. conducted an on- site visit to obtain familiarity with the site and surrounding area. Field work was done between 7:50 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. The weather and visibility conditions were clear skies with deciduous leaves off of -the trees. Photographs taken presented reference points for calculation of the placement of the proposed facility, using red flags attached to a crane (set at a height of 120± feet agl), as seen from each view point, where visible. Fourteen (14) view points proximate to the proposed facility location were selected for analysis as areas of potential visual impact of the completed project. Photographic simulations of the proposed facility were prepared from fourteen representative locations from which the proposed facility would be visible. A Photographic Simulation Location Map depicting the View Points is included as Figure 6. A complete letter of methodology is included with the photographic simulations in Appendix B. 11 Photographic Simulation Analysis vhb Photographic Simulation Analysis The results of the photographic simulation analysis are summarized below with existing conditions photographs and photographic simulations included in Appendix B. View Point A — from near the benches in the park at Mattituck Inlet, 1,348± feet west of the proposed facility location. The View Point A existing conditions photograph depicts the area near the Mattituck Inlet, including paved parking, residential structures, grasses, deciduous trees, utility poles and overhead utility lines. The photographic simulation indicates that the top portion of the proposed stealth unipole would be visible from this location and that the proposed whip antennas would not be readily discernable. Moreover, future antennas would be concealed within. Based on the stealth design of the proposed facility, the presence of intervening structures and the established visual horizon containing utility poles and overhead utility lines, and as the proposed stealth unipole would not appear to extend higher than the utility poles in the foreground, the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts from this view point. View Point B — from near the intersection of Route 48 and Route 25, 5,107± feet west-southwest of the proposed facility location. The View Point B existing conditions photograph depicts the Route 48/Middle Road corridor, with utility poles and overhead utility lines and surrounding trees. The photographic simulation indicates that a small portion of the top of the proposed stealth unipole would be visible above the treeline from this location. However, it would barely be discernible. As such, the proposed facility would not result in a significant adverse visual impact from this view point. View Point C — from the Mattituck train station, near the stairs and sitting area, 823± feet west-southwest of the proposed facility location. The View Point C existing conditions photograph depicts a parking lot and commercial buildings near the Mattituck train station, as well as utility poles, overhead utility lines, surrounding trees, and a lamp post in the foreground. The photographic simulation indicates that the top half of the proposed stealth unipole would be visible from this location and that the proposed whip antennas would be barely discernable. Further, any future antennas to collocate would be concealed within. Based on the stealth design of the proposed facility and the presence of overhead utility lines and intervening structures, the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts from this view point. View Point D — from the sidewalk adjacent to Westphalia Avenue and near the driveway to 13075 Sound Avenue, 1,018± feet southwest of the proposed facility location. The View Point D existing conditions photograph depicts a commercial 13 Photographic Simulation Analysis %1O vhb area near Westphalia Avenue, including a lawn, parking lot, and commercial structures, with overhead utility lines, light posts, and deciduous and evergreen vegetation. The photographic simulation indicates that the proposed stealth unipole would be visible from this location and that the proposed whip antennas would be barely discernable. Moreover, future wireless communications antennas would be concealed within same. Based on the presence of light posts, overhead utility wires, and intervening deciduous vegetation, and as the proposed facility will not appear to be taller than the light posts in view, the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts from this view point from this location, especially during the "leaf -on" months. View Point E — from the sidewalk adjacent to the intersection of Main Road and Love Lane and near the Octagon Building, 564± feet south-southwest of the proposed facility location. The View Point E existing conditions photograph depicts commercial structures and landscaping on Main Road. The photographic simulation indicates that the top half of the proposed stealth unipole and whip antennas would be visible from this location. However, future wireless communications antennas would be concealed within same. Based on the stealth design of the proposed facility and the presence of intervening commercial structures, installation of the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts from this view point. View Point F — from adjacent to Main Road, near the intersection with Love Lane, 784± feet south-southwest of the proposed facility location. The View Point F existing conditions photograph depicts Main Road, with commercial structures, signage, utility poles, overhead utility lines and deciduous trees. The photographic simulation indicates that the top half of the proposed stealth unipole would be visible from this location and that the proposed whip antennas would be minimally visible. Further, any future wireless communications antennas would be concealed within same. Based on the stealth design of the proposed facility and given the existing visual clutter from this vantage point, installation of the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts from this view point, especially during the "leaf -on" months. View Point G — from near 190 Rochelle Place, 4,586± feet south-southeast of the proposed facility location. The View Point G existing conditions photograph depicts residential structures at Rochelle Place and surrounding trees. The photographic simulation indicates that the top of the proposed stealth unipole would be faintly visible above deciduous trees from this location and that future wireless communications antennas would be concealed within same. Based on the stealth design of the proposed facility and the presence of intervening deciduous vegetation, installation of the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts from this view point, especially during the "leaf -on" months. 14 Photographic Simulation Analysis # 0,0` vhb View Point H — from near 405 Reeve Avenue, 1,507± feet east-southeast of the proposed facility location. The View Point H existing conditions photograph depicts the parking area of a church on Reeve Avenue and surrounding structures and trees. The photographic simulation indicates that the proposed stealth unipole would be visible from this location, however, the whip antennas would be obscured from view. Moreover, the proposed future wireless communications antennas would be concealed within same. However, during the "leaf off" season, the proposed facility would be partially obscured by intervening vegetation (i.e., it would not be prominent on the visual horizon) and during the "leaf on" season it is anticipated that it would be completely obscured by intervening vegetation. Based on the stealth design of the proposed facility and the presence of intervening deciduous vegetation, installation of the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts from this view point, especially during the "leaf - on" months. View Point I — from the sidewalk adjacent to Main Road and the Mattituck-Laurel Public Library, 773± feet east of the proposed facility location. The View Point I existing conditions photograph depicts commercial structures, utility poles, overhead utility lines, and surrounding trees along Main Road near the Montauk -Laurel Public Library. The photographic simulation indicates that the top half of the proposed stealth unipole would be visible from this location, but the whip antennas would be minimally visible. Further, future wireless communications antennas would be concealed within same. Based on the stealth design of the proposed facility and the presence of intervening deciduous and evergreen vegetation, installation of the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts from this view point, especially during the "leaf -on' months. View Point J — from Mill Lane, 3,282± feet northeast of the proposed facility location. The View Point J existing conditions photograph depicts a field surrounded by trees with residential structures beyond on Mill Lane. The photographic simulation indicates that the top of the proposed stealth unipole would be visible from this location, whip antennas would not be discernable, and future wireless communications antennas would be concealed within same. Based on the stealth design of the proposed facility and the presence of intervening deciduous and evergreen vegetation, installation of the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts from this view point, especially during the "leaf - on" months. View Point K — from neat the driveway to 1500 Wickham Avenue, 1,211± feet north-northwest of the proposed facility location. The View Point K existing conditions photograph depicts Wickham Road, north of the Middle Road intersection, with residential and commercial structures, deciduous and evergreen trees, utility poles, overhead utility lines and traffic signals. The photographic simulation indicates that the proposed stealth unipole would be visible from this 15 Photographic Simulation Analysis mw�--'vhb location, the proposed whip antennas would barely be visible, and future wireless communications antennas would be concealed within. Given that utility poles are already an established part of this visual horizon and that the proposed facility will not appear to be taller than the utility pole in the foreground, as well as the stealth design of the facility, there would not be a significant adverse visual impact from this location. Moreover, during the growing season it is anticipated that visibility of the proposed facility would be largely obscured, if not completely, by intervening vegetation. View Point L — from near 1130 Wickham Avenue, 803± feet north-northwest of the proposed facility location. The View Point L existing conditions photograph depicts Wickham Road between Middle Road and the rail road tracks, with commercial structures, utility poles, overhead utility lines, and trees among the structures. The photographic simulation indicates that the proposed stealth unipole and whip antennas would be visible from this location, while future wireless communications antennas would be concealed within same. Based on the stealth design of the proposed facility and the presence of utility poles and railroad infrastructure visible along the horizon, installation of the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts to from this view point. View Point M — from neat the intersection of Pike Street and Mary's Road, 948± feet northeast of the proposed facility location. The View Point M existing conditions photograph depicts Pike Street with utility poles, overhead utility lines, residential structures, and trees along the road. The photographic simulation indicates that the top of the proposed stealth unipole would be visible among the trees from this location, however, the proposed whip antennas would not be discernable. Additionally, future wireless communications antennas would be concealed within same. Based on the stealth design of the proposed facility and the presence of overhead utility lines and intervening deciduous and evergreen vegetation, installation of the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts from this view point, especially during the "leaf -on" months. View Point N — from near 280 Wickham Avenue, 239± feet northeast of the proposed facility location. The View Point N existing conditions photograph depicts the rear of the fire station and an existing wooden communications pole at the subject site, as well as surrounding structures, light posts, and a utility pole. The photographic simulation indicates that the existing wooden communications facility would be removed and that the proposed stealth unipole and rooftop equipment concealment structure (for future equipment associated with collocation) would be visible from this location. It should be noted that these photographic simulations were prepared prior to design modifications by the applicant, specifically, the proposed installation of whip antennas on lower portions of the pole. When installed, whip antennas would be visible from this vantage point. However, a view containing whip antennas would be consistent with the existing communications 16 Photographic Simulation Analysis facility on-site, and there would not be a significant impact associated with'whip antenna visibility. Based on the stealth design of the proposed facility (i.e., future antennas concealed within the unipole and future rooftop equipment concealed behind paneling designed to match the building fagade) and the presence of an existing facility to be removed, installation of the proposed facility would not result in significant adverse visual impacts at, and in the vicinity of, the subject site. As the visual analysis indicates, the proposed communications facility would be visible from several vantage points throughout the surrounding area. However, the proposed facility would be partially obscured by intervening vegetation from many vantage points throughout the'surrounding area, and as the photographic simulations were prepared in early spring (leaf -off) conditions, it is anticipated that during the growing season, the presence of leaves on the trees would provide additional screening, if not completely obscuring the facility from view. Should future collocation occur, the proposed facility has been designed such that the wireless communications antennas would be concealed within the stealth unipole, and associated rooftop equipment would be concealed behind a structure that is visually consistent with the existing fire station, helping to mitigate potential visual impacts. As such, the proposed communications facility upgrade would not have a significant overall adverse visual impact on neighborhood aesthetics, and is sited and designed so as to be the least visually and physically obtrusive as possible. 17 Photographic Simulation Analysis vhb Findings and Conclusions The one -mile radius visibility study, in conjunction with the photographic simulation analysis, indicates that the proposed stealth unipole would have limited visibility throughout the surrounding area, particularly when the trees are in bloom. Further, as the proposed 120± -foot agl stealth unipole would conceal future wireless communications antennas within, and as the proposed roof -top equipment associated with collocation would be concealed behind a structure that is visually consistent with the existing fire station facade, potential adverse visual impacts would not be significant. Thus, the proposed facility has been sited and designed to be the least visually and physically obtrusive as possible and has mitigated potential adverse visual impacts to the extent practicable. PA29217.02 Elite Towers Mattituck\ProjRecords\FinalDocs\DRAFT Elite Towers Mattituck One -Mile Visual Study—Revised 12-2014.doa 18 Findings and Conclusions L.] GFr�,�luee�rhtg, SFFI't e')tfrF call Landscal.)oArebitesctum, EC,: C e n xYN 1 i!1 � i it `-' I.J f. _ �� „�. $a ' .��a . _- T r•` ` a ' 'T+^ 4 �Y R' b :.'� p� '{: #•+ i _ w CO a- y m n � Miller ` NOW W h �I -p <F'�. `} �it� .' �_ •'gin �' v,. <� + mr © . S 1T E It -0 o r!A*r is m N '. ® r' • eta [N C� 9 • e C, LEGEND a • fi E �r v PartiallyCD Y Visible f' P �G014 oogre GooRte ear}'th 4 lat 40Ima Imagery Date: 9#19j2013 .9914330 Ion -72.5332460 elev 18 ft eye at 1040 ft 0 Proposed Wireless Communications Facility at 1000 Pike Street Hamlet of Mattituck, Town of Southold One -Mile Radius Visibility Study Photographs — April 3, 2014 Photograph No. 1: View from the intersection of Wickham Avenue and Middle Road. Photograph No. 2: View from the intersection of Freeman Road and Wickham Avenue. Proposed Wireless Communications Facility at 1000 Pike Street Hamlet of Mattituck, Town of Southold One -Mile Radius Visibility Study Photographs — April 3, 2014 Photograph No. 3: View from the intersection of Farmer Road and Wickham Avenue. Photograph No. 4: View from the intersection of Bayer Road and Wickham Avenue. ."'•' ,:'r �7r..�.s r. rt --y lsiTi: �, "'� �''►►a`91% ,�<'r RVII YJ'�- �.. is Yom': q�` -�� .,ir{�, �► ��` �-, *� lirAs ! a �s WXi,A6j9r 1 71 .'�% ►fi�`'i+ � �''.::}i�, � g. -: i ,,4.�7► {�n s� f- � i DRi �.:. AIM• r, sr w:r R Proposed Wireless Communications Facility at 1000 Pike Street Hamlet of Mattituck, Town of Southold One -Mile Radius Visibility Study Photographs — April 3, 2014 R q Photograph No. 7: View from the intersection of Mary's Road and Middle Road. .✓ � F+rt f.. 2%�. ��N I 1u ��1 yyue'- .T.`" «�Y ��� fj iS Photograph No. 8: View from the intersection of Brower Road and Grand Avenue. Proposed Wireless Communications Facility at 1000 Pike Street Hamlet of Mattituck, Town of Southold One -Mile Radius Visibility Study Photographs — April 3, 2014 f. f 1 'f � ♦ ,rte i�Tr _.4 Photograph No. 9: View from the intersection of Maiden Lane and Middle Road. Photograph No. 10: View from the intersection of Love Lane and the Long Island Rail Road. Note the presence of the existing pole to be removed. Proposed Wireless Communications Facility at 1000 Pike Street Hamlet of Mattituck, Town of Southold One -Mile Radius Visibility Study Photographs — April 3, 2014 Photograph No. 11: View from the intersection of Love Lane and Middle Road. Photograph No. 12: View from the intersection of Westphalia Avenue and the Long Island Rail Road. Proposed Wireless Communications Facility at 1000 Pike Street Hamlet of Mattituck, Town of Southold One -Mile Radius Visibility Study Photographs — April 3, 2014 Photograph No. 13: View from the intersection of Pike Street and Wickham Avenue. Note the presence of the existing pole to be removed. Photograph No. 14: View from the intersection of Mary's Road and Pike Street. Proposed Wireless Communications Facility at 1000 Pike Street Hamlet of Mattituck, Town of Southold One -Mile Radius Visibility Study Photographs — April 3, 2014 Photograph No. 15: View from the intersection of Hill Street and Wickham Avenue. Note the presence of the existing pole to be removed. AA 'Aft Photograph No. 16: View from the northwest corner of Village Lane. Proposed Wireless Communications Facility at 1000 Pike Street Hamlet of Mattituck, Town of Southold Photograph No. 17: View from near the middle of Mill Lane. Photograph No. 18: View from near the intersection of Airway Drive and New Suffolk Avenue. Proposed Wireless Communications Facility at 1000 Pike Street Hamlet of Mattituck, Town of Southold One -Mile Radius Visibility Study Photographs — April 3, 2014 Photograph No. 19: View from New Suffolk Avenue, south of Marratooka Pond. Photograph No. 20: View from the intersection of Reeve Avenue and Main Road. Proposed Wireless Communications Facility at 1000 Pike Street Hamlet of Mattituck, Town of Southold One -Mile Radius Visibility Study Photographs — April 3, 2014 Photograph No. 21: View from the intersection of Love Lane and Pike Street. Note the presence of the existing pole to be removed. Photograph No. 22: View from the intersection of Westphalia Avenue and Pike Street. 3 _rasa Proposed Wireless Communications Facility at 1000 Pike Street Hamlet of Mattituck, Town of Southold One -Mile Radius Visibility Study Photographs — April 3, 2014 5' m - Photograph No. 25: View from the intersection of Main Road and New Suffolk Avenue. Photograph No. 26: View from the intersection of Main Road and Sound Avenue. Proposed Wireless Communications Facility at 1000 Pike Street Hamlet of Mattituck, Town of Southold One -Mile Radius Visibility Study Photographs — April 3, 2014 £b``` Photograph No. 27: View from the intersection of Main Road and Wickham Avenue. Prepared for Elite Towers, �_P pic€ b Creative • 2014 Creative Visuals, Inc. Post Office Box 435 Bearsville, New York 12409 Phone (914) 388®1952 email: cvisualskaol.com May 14, 2014 Elite Towers, LP 87 Industry Court Suite J Deer Park, New York 11729 RE: Proposed Public Utility Wireless Communication Facility To Whom It May Concern: The following is a description of the methodology used in preparing the visual analysis study and photo realistic renderings of a post -construction Elite Towers, LP public utility wireless communication facility ("Facility") to be located at 1000 Pike Street, Mattituck, NY. The analysis depicts the proposed 120' AGL (Above Ground Level) unipole and associated rooftop equipment that will replace the existing wood unipole. Creative Visuals, Inc. has prepared a visual study of the completed Facility utilizing the process described below. The study was performed during leaf -off conditions, thus providing a "worst-case" scenario. An on-site visit was made to obtain familiarity with the terrain and its surrounding neighborhoods. Fourteen view points were selected for analysis as areas of potential visual impact and for photo representation of the completed Facility: Description of View Point Approximate Distance to Site View point A — from near the benches in the park at Mattituck Inlet; 1,348' View point B — from near the intersection of Route 48 and Route 25; 5,107' View point C — from the Mattituck train station, near the stairs and sitting area; 823' View point D — from the sidewalk adjacent to Westphalia Avenue and near the driveway to 1,018' 13075 Sound Avenue; View point E — from the sidewalk adjacent to the intersection of Main Road and Love Lane and 564' near the Octagon Building; View point F — from adjacent to Main Road, near the intersection with Love Lane; 784' View point G — from near 190 Rochelle Place; 4,586' View point H — from near 405 Reeve Avenue; 1,507' View point I — from the sidewalk adjacent to Main Road and the Mattituck-Laurel Public Library; 773' View point J — from Mill Lane; 3,282' View point K — from near the driveway to 1500 Wickham Avenue; View point L — from near 1130 Wickham Avenue; 1,211' 803' View point M — from near the intersection of Pike Street and Mary's Road; 948' View point N — from near 280 Wickham Avenue. 239' Larry Heimel took photographs of the site from each of the view points under study using a Canon EOS 5D digital camera with a 50mm lens. The fieldwork was done April 3, 2014 between 7:50 A.M. and 12:00 P.M. Conditions were clear skies. These photos presented a reference point for calculation of the placement of the Facility, as seen from each view point where visible, using red flags attached to a crane. The red flags were attached to the crane and set close to the proposed pole location at 120' AGL. For the simulation of the rooftop equipment, the existing building was used as a reference. The photos were taken as digital high-resolution files. A 3D program was used to create a model of the actual proposed Facility using measurements taken in the field and dimensions furnished by the Applicant. 3D software photorealistically rendered the proposed Facility as seen from each of the photo simulation view points, maintaining the perspective of the mm lens used during photography. This resulted by exporting the location of the Facility and view points into the 3D program from AutoCAD. The 3D software utilized this imported file to reference the Facility and view point locations, thus maintaining their relative X, Y and Z (the difference in elevation, bearing and distance to) distances. The Facility was generated with its actual dimensions as a vectorized 3D model. Each view point including the site was elevated to its relative AMSL (Above Mean Sea Level). The 3D program cameras were set at each view point's X, Y and Z location and photographed the model with the mm lens correlating to the view point photos. The X, Y and Z coordinates allowed the 3D camera to render the Facility to its correct scale, rotation and angle from each view point. The Facility was assigned "photorealistic" materials. in the 3D software. 3D software simulated sunlight on the 3D model, taking into account the site latitude, date and time of day of the view point photographs. Adobe Photoshop software was used in the process of overlaying the 3D model onto the corresponding visible references used during photography. The crane reference was digitally removed from the view point photographs. The existing wood unipole was digitally removed from the view point photographs where visible. Finally, the photorealistically-rendered 3D model was integrated into the site photos. Conclusion Based upon our over nineteen years' experience.in visual analysis, as well as analyzing over 1,000 public utility structure sites throughout the region, we are confident that the enclosed visual study reasonably reflects the appearance of the Facility, at the captioned site. Sinter L e' el, Pr s ern C ve Visuals, Inc. � � �'^',• t i 1rrrAi 'r ` • ' iit • ' ` 'r - 1 •G' : �'` bac ^f`� � ..c� C r. 1. A � 'l .4�t � ?✓ -,J- -Stoll, y01, F` "pH•asnetyt an�uor6 K a . \ 'Y •ry _.,.r , �' ' } . �. �` - is . l,%U11- 1 Upo6 . „ a, r, A . w' y, is / .?^ ,µ,my:. ,, .!'� ti •��, •�4J' Q T p, ` y. � � ��i J i���Y� •sti` ji{j: .,4� \��� - �','R � ,,-" t• r - i 7,m + � ' c, _ � i ", ; r I g� Q r : -moo � pot-' , , �+ • q� , w N.•_ � o r° --'1`."i _ '+t •mow Q _ � 0 a � d' \.'.' g8ud r_ � Oar , yoRr • �� ! .-/' R+ a • .Japd•6 a �', ♦ V'\Q.' .- >=•. ,o ,y: " m .' � ,fn ./,r-T�4..-. ''r %Ia A -gol, .4jBrt� s . 'c. S• �R"` i �o -at ,.«P�%� ''.+. •� V�, �'wpi r•4 ,� - . # 1 '•'yy 2 -. , v . 4�a, xr. � .oi�� 4!,. � '�`� � ,.•• l an :. foo � '� � sem, o tm ' � 1 � w 7y % �_ •o ,�M a d% ,yas L: 4ji� p j � � 1` � '' • � a . '� - �,a� l0 , �a\-ydcea/ e �,� ate., Ks ' , . 3' 6r1r 'k' �+Gn r"ss �/ - � a� •°w. 4A�p 4 /� a ��03 ?11� j., � d "'+�. 3r v a41 v90 , eNN IN s . :. `') �� � � bb ,�• � . oto`, / oA0 s Jr . �,'Gaa . , P � " '`. ,� '� � dei �" �\°p� ! • yY k:w, �' '�?' �;yh - / 2 , a 15 n A� a n n p 6!k � 1r 0 , Y t Y F✓ •, r �+i..�P`.-:..f.'; .».k � mY•= - : n""` '.�� � .y'M' r, �+*�� 4'" ,{." # Ae„ r'� ` . , :, Y + •rr S '�* :'y r�„a;'�'kjri s °�k m r^i � ,�' ; ., y hr r �*,w `"*a. ,�, y �.K � Va�'ry �} % . ,.1wd 7 'Y' ,� ' � i •F �b 1 'Q#' `K. ti � 4 �'� � �_ 16 ro- ,� ^.A.. � 9 ti t �, n d` � •`q '� 17r � •, k r,� A lyi, tta -,;, ': a,h �'. y=� � 4' , - �5�� , .. v w �ss r .'. Wit• .iR' A,�,� �terra '� -, �T" � a� iii.; I✓' ,,.mac W g 4IA "�. _ .. ,� ' v r y�1 • j ! r� i :a f � yl,. � � 7✓lw,'✓ r y � ' ►? , fi=r ` \ C#?l t '� � t +ivy y `b ' f` �f►�t4 � gav C a ,t INC .t. a Existing view View point B - from near the intersection of Route 48 and Route 25 Photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. Computer simulated photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. ` '. > � � E� do �� � B 4 `i ,.yt'"'^ • � ``vk'. "�L � } �.�" : � +1rz�. A � ht ** � � �v"v d �11• "8' ';tw �: s "'�Ta rtr- �, `. ;F ,. � ", s ,=���`�qu �?i'.." ,� ,; „�.q Computer simulated photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. • i Y t .fl ; � +�f i�•� `fie' existing view View point D - from the sidewalk adjacent to Westphalia Avenue and near the driveway to 13075 Sound Avenue AV YF yg Photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. View point D - from the sidewalk adjacent to Westphalia Avenue and near the driveway to 13075 Sound Avenue Computer simulated photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. dds f Jie tir: Existing view View point F - from adjacent Main Road,near intersectionLane a . y, j• :f o • fid°*��,� ww A 101 ���tr P '� '� "°'lam •`py[ �, "s''� � � rt,,, _ 1 _ _ 9 i l� Photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. View point F - from adjacent to Main Road, near the intersection with Love Lane � p t Tc.s_ ;i{V yy + D r. «J Q w � w ---------------- �t LIBERTY w DRIVEWAY >v ffi Computer simulated photo by Creative Visuals, Inc, Existing view View point G - from near 190 Rochelle Place Photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. View point G - from near 190 Rochelle Place ;;--7 Computer simulated photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. Existing view View point H - from near 405 Reeve Avenue J , A&,�' .M ^ iR g� NV Photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. View point H - from near 405 Reeve Avenue Existing view View point 1 - from the sidewalk adjacent to Main Road and the Mattituck-Laurel Public Library c , �+• { S, � � � � � ''tea. �`: C,1,*i _ ,.-.�--...._ --- .moi =•' .�` �. 4 y= r a r L ' a t r m i f 7�i i Photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. View point I - from the sidewalk adjacent to Main Road and the Mattituck-Laurel Public Library .y • � ti r F vF- _ A A . �--•ems.— '-' ' - -- 8 f q K r r� , w � ry t ` IiRUNr , Computer simulated photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. Existing view View point J - from Mill Lane '�� i. ' w•r-• " Y � � � � r 5 ' l � �r i •" N4� 94RiC Wt t�"} '" `h. xr •,Rr'4 ,�,x ��d- R + t �1 '2 4 ,� .'r•�c''.�q �v ., wl`'*.. .w. "!�e' (d� *ah 6 w, w.. 'i:'°" a �t� � 't a. ..i w L . •%' "A4 Y .. ,� - s �, r.� �• y ` Nf�i �„ 4 rt � �t p,ry i �:;" y k, 4* N, ��� � .�� 4�K+'kar4F :'4 �'�'� : i . M .' R3 �4' .,.��`' .. .. i4�•t . 7i �'�' r.� ... .. '' 1 , � M�'.'•.M'il ..e Photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. 77� ............. lip -E -i.1- -.- s h � ��� � � �'f d}gyp ��. •7x ... ». ....77 k .,� t "' fid"' �' �.,?f✓� i t. Offin I Fill It ' *% y A r •" �� tti \�1 �1� YV '; l� c ,, r� �r JIM®R,+N a . 1 r +Ar? ti tl pe fdL w, * i+o 'al,� /j•� r tray A .�_..._....'. �� to �� M , + �c! r h. �.. 1 �`yr-,.+.-..,,� •ya�` v� a �/y� . �� ^al,.sTi�^ !x' a+*�io- ~Lt 'n� I 04 tC � '•u � Ag y� N' 71110111 eyJ`v I v s x. . C'F r _ .r � j UNi • _ y * t'. Ty 'L'o. T -S •i r - ,irE 3 ^-.f\ �'�i'; n�"'�rt' 3:.•.p.', ` � -. •re ,�. 'tr..1:,. Existing view View point N - from near 280 Wickham Avenue Photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. View point N - from near 280 Wickham Avenue -.Iv - i i. i Computer simulated photo by Creative Visuals, Inc. L.: MA