Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFlaherty, Eileen & VincentCEDAR DRIVE EA �T 019. SURVEY OF PROPERTY N A T CEDAR BEA CH 57875 p cW .25.00- 0"o TOWN OF SO UTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, MY 1000-92-01-08 04 SCALE.- 1°--40' NOV. 22, 2004 MAY 3, 2011 (TIDAL WETLANDS LOCA 710N) pbyp�5 .. '� 77E LINES �56 �jk ALONG MHWM - _ SET �� �w.'• �,o � ZONE AE 6 \ , S'b z9 a Y �� EN PSD ::EGAZEBOSDO� �F z= �� SRN Pv gSV. NG' 1N i r1E BOCG BALL COURT U1 Nc OS PS01- SZ ONw� ° — NN civ o y P R NM1 8 00 ® EOGf pOf 11L�UO2 209 / ,•'�,i i 0• ' R. O FISH POND ,. 00 v 5ilaP ° P R RAVEL O G o \ •,/i 0 �+r /�o;po�• i.� � /i N z,.r LOT 92 � - wooDy 14 / 38.2 DECK F O �Jll N88,00,00" E 4-90.00, 2 STY. FR. ZONE X �d0 HOUSE RAVEL DR I VEWAY N (rer.u.s.39 za.a N P°°L°AGK l m 27.6' 7' WOOD BULKHEAD_ ZONE uNE _ WOOD DECK MHWAM. LOT 95 LOT 94 ZONE I VE 8 •W '67 p ` LOT 218 W AE L/N1 3 MHW1N. $ ~� 1443y, � N76�426br� e 41;;e - 10 N® _ rlz` _ CIO ry a 186^71, n EDGE OF 77DAL WETLANDS AT M.H.W.M. AS 19EL1NEAMD BY SUFFOLK ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUL ANG INC ON APRIL 26, 2011 { i. MSi SHORELINE AS PER F/L�E D MAP � � -f • o Note. Flood Zones from FIRM 36.103CO169H Sept. 25, 2009 LITTLE PECONI C BAY' f.flr.elevations referenced to NGVD $ �, 1 =WETLAND FLAG 4961 CONICS ANY ALTERATION OR AD0177ON TO THIS SURVEY IS A WOLA77ON 631 765-5020 FAX (631) 765-1797 OF SECnON 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCA77ON LAW. T^. LOT NUMBERS ARE REFERENCED TO 'MAP OF ( ) r_— iii = lAl Tuc nccil`P- nF THF P.O. BOX 909 r Samuels & Steelman Architects on behalf of EILEEN & VINCENT J. FLAHERTY requests a Wetland Permit to demolish existing residence and construction of new two-story structure with addition of a subsurface drainage system for rain water runoff for the proposed residence and existing driveway. Located: 470 Inlet Way, Southold. SCTM# 92-1-8 Type of area to be impacted: _Saltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland Sound Bay Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland Pari'of Town Code proposed work falls under: _Chapt.275 Chapt.111 other Type of Application: � Wetland _Coastal Erosion _Amendment Administrative_Emergency Pre -Submission Violation Info needed: / Modifications: Conditions: Prese t Were: J. King B. Ghosio g D. Berg en, J. Bredemeyer ichael Domino D. Dzenkowski other, Form filled out in the field by Mailed/Faxed to: Date: � .Tames F King, President ��� P O Box 1179 Bob Ghosio, Jr., Vice -President Southold, NY 11971 Dave Bergen Telephone (631 765-1892 John Bredemeyer ,y. Fax (631) 765-6641 Michael J Domino Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection/Work Session Report -Date/Time: Samuels & Steelman Architects on behalf of EILEEN & VINCENT J. FLAHERTY requests a Wetland Permit to demolish existing residence and construction of new two-story structure with addition of a subsurface drainage system for rain water runoff for the proposed residence and existing driveway. Located: 470 Inlet Way, Southold. SCTM# 92-1-8 Type of area to be impacted: _Saltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland Sound Bay Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland Pari'of Town Code proposed work falls under: _Chapt.275 Chapt.111 other Type of Application: � Wetland _Coastal Erosion _Amendment Administrative_Emergency Pre -Submission Violation Info needed: / Modifications: Conditions: Prese t Were: J. King B. Ghosio g D. Berg en, J. Bredemeyer ichael Domino D. Dzenkowski other, Form filled out in the field by Mailed/Faxed to: Date: Flaherty Residence, 470 Inlet Way 11/3/109 10:00 am, #5 View East Flaherty Residence, 470 Inlet Way 11/3/10, 10:00 am, #6 View East No Flaherty Residence, 470 Inlet Way 11/3/10, 10:00 am, #3 View West Flaherty Residence, 470 Inlet Way 11/3/109 10:00 am, #4 View Northwest Flaherty Residence, 470 Inlet Way 11/3/10, 10:00 am, #1 View Northwest Flaherty Residence, 470 Inlet Way 11/3/109 10:00 am, #2 View North Flaherty Residence, 470 Inlet Way 11/3/10, 10:00 am, #3 View West a Flaherty Residence, 470 Inlet Way 11/3/10, 10:00 am, #4 View Northwest � T f .Y Flaherty Residence, 470 Inlet Way 11 /3/10, 10:00 am, #5 View East Flaherty Residence, 470 Inlet Way 11 /3/10, 10:00 am, #6 View East BOARD- OF 9OUT14OLD TOWN TMAT-EtS 9dVTH&1j', NEW ! VbRk PERM4T NQr�7640 JMTSEPTEMBER -2, -2011 ,& D;TO�.�,EILEEN.,&,Vl-�-Ni�C,-,E-N,T-,J.�FLA,H-E-R,.T-Y,, PROPERTY AD]DIZESSj,?'47-04'NLET �WAYSGVTROLID, SCTM.# 92-1®8 AUTHORIZATION 4app .q yatn% to. the,'p.rqvisioqs.ofiq �75.-of th,e,.TOiyaqc e: of the,Towm,of SopthQld and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adqp- qdOer t i_ - 21..201/1, and in consideration of application fee in the sum of $250.00 paid by Eileen Vincent J. Flaherty and subject to the Teras s and; Conditions as stated in the, Resolution, the S uthold.Tp!��"of Truste s, authorizes and, PF -910Wiqg: Wetland Permit to ch6ito"the'-exilsit-kii gdwei g with oiinii fr!: U- 6i4!' a. n� 'ia dd rehov 'q # p itlpn of a -C F#q& Qf Pjjky7qo!!��% I.,P 99� _,g p T -IP ..": 11�!-F':�--. VJ-- subsurface drainage system f6r rain water run-off for thedwelling. -OMIt p _, ­p-xis#qg- driveway; with a fine of staked hay bales. with silt fencing to be installed prior to constyuOtion,. and -as., de-pict�dioii--th6-.site.,--plah!prepar,.ediby.-Samudlg A.,StedImAn Architects, last dated June 149 20119 and 2011- fNMtrN9WWHEREOF, the said4ohrd.6f Ti6st&ft' hirebYcauses :iwcftdfAtb=-S(iiI td'be affixed, and thesdpre'96htsto�bd:tubs6r-ibedby(�majfDnty-of;the,4gaidB.6&.das.oftWg-date.4;- ,., - _ - - - s - -- - OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY 11971 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM no 4i n Fjf 3 2013 To: Jim King, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees _,!�.�::i�_.-.�.-oma From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: November 13, 2013 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review for EILEEN & VINCENT J. FLAHERTY SCTM#1000-92-1-8 Samuels & Steelman Architects on behalf of EILEEN & VINCENT J. FLAHERTY requests a Wetland Permit to demolish existing residence and construction of new two-story structure with addition of a subsurface drainage system for rain water runoff for the proposed residence and existing driveway. Located: 470 Inlet Way, Southold. SCTM# 92-1-8 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed actions are CONSISTENT with the LWRP. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney %�g�yrru�,�•�� Peter Young, Chairman c Lauren Standish, Secretary ,_ C�y�O��� Conservation Advisory Council Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Rd. P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax(631)765-6641 At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., November 6, 2013 the following recommendation was made: Moved by Doug Hardy, seconded by Jack McGreevy, it was RESOLVED to SUPPORT the application of EILEEN; AND VINCENT J. FLAHERTY to demolish the existing residence and construct new structure with addition of a subsurface drainage system for rain water run-off for the residence and existing driveway. Located: 470 Inlet Way, Southold. SCTM#92-1-8 Inspected by:. Peter Young, Doug Hardy, Jack McGreevy The CAC Supports the application with the Condition the roof drains from all structures are directed into drywells and the new structure should be FEMA compliant. The CAC questions the legality of the floating dock. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried 4 BOARD MEMBERS Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Eric Dantes Gerard P. Goehringer George Horning Ken Schneider October 18, 2013 http://southoldtown.northfork.net TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road ® P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex /First Floor, Capital One Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 Tel. (631) 765-1809 ® Fax (631) 765-9064 Tom Samuels Samuels & Steelman, Architects 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: De minimus request Flaherty ZBA#6583 Dear Mr. Samuels, OCT 2 2 2013 I have reviewed your letter dated October 15, 2013 and the copy of the building permit, elevation certificate and foundation plan dated 7/29/13 that you submitted with your request for a de minimus determination in the above referenced ZBA determination. I presented your request to the members of the Board of Appeals at our Special Meeting on October 17, 2013. Since you do not propose any bulkhead setback changes to the variances granted in decision #6583, the Board has determined that your requested modification is de minimus in nature. This is because the location of the dwelling is in an AE8 flood zone and you are proposing only a 1 foot 8 inch change in the height to conform with FEMA regulations, thereby making the dwelling more conforming to current environmental standards while creating only a minor visual change from the originally proposed additions and alterations. The proposed new construction, after the demolition of the existing dwelling, may only involve a replacement in place and in kind as shown on the survey approved with the original decision dated 8/6/12 and the building plans in the file dated 6/25/12 labeled plans and elevations sheet 2. Also, no change in the existing footprint is permitted without another review. This .de minimus determination is conditioned upon obtaining from the Board of Town Trustees an amended approval for new footings for the proposed new foundation. I will instruct the office to send a copy of this letter and a stamped approved copy of the building plan with your request to the Building Department so that you can apply for a building permit. If you have any questions, please call the office. Since a. Leslie Kanes Weisman Chairperson/Dept. Head October 15, 2013 Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall Annex Southold, NY 11971 Re: Request for de minimus .finding ZBA file #6583 amended Flaherty Residence Attn: Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson JIM RECEIVED OCT 1 1 2013 BOARD OF APPEALS The above referenced variance was approved on 9/20/12 and amended 5/16/13 (enclosed). Thereafter, a building permit was granted on 8/23/13 (enclosed) and construction begun. See enclosed FOUNDATION PLAN, showing areas to remain and to be replaced with new masonry. In accordance with that permit, a portion of the existing house was demolished, at which point a more complete inspection of the existing foundation was possible (there is a very shallow crawl space). It was discovered that those existing footings intended to remain are shallower than current practice and code permit. In addition, some charring of existing framing was uncovered, presumably from a fire of several years ago. It is the interest of my client that the remainder of the existing foundation be removed, together with the pre-existing framing above it, and a new foundation and complete new frame be constructed. The existing attached accessory building would remain as is, linked to the principal structure by covered breezeway. This proposal was made to Chief Building Inspector, Mike Verity. He suggested that, since the project has a variance, it would be necessary to approach you and request a de minimus determination. For clarity, the variance granted involved the enlargement of a pre-existing, non -conforming (for setback to bulkhead) structure. Mike Verity also stated that, since the entire principal structure would be replaced, it would have to meet the requirements of FEMA and be lifted approximately 1'-8", resulting in a first floor elevation of 8'-0" above datum. As the building permit now stands the first floor is below the minimum flood elevation, per the Elevation Certificate (enclosed). If a de minimus determination is granted by the ZBA, and the building permit amended, the new construction would exactly match the size and layout of the existing. The structure would not get any larger, nor encroach any more upon setbacks. ARCHITECTS 25235 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 (631) 734-6405 FAX (631) 734-6407 Time is of the essence. Construction is underway, and it is imperative to pour the new foundation as soon as possible and enclose the structure before inclement weather sets in. If a de minimus determination is not granted, the owners intend to continue with the project as permitted; there is no time for a new hearing at the ZBA. We believe the permission to construct a new code compliant foundation together with a completely new frame, with the floor level above the minimum flood elevation, would be an improvement of the project and a benefit to all, and would not change the character of the neighborhood, nor have a negative impact in any way. Please consider this request and respond at your earliest convenience, Thank you so much for your assistance, k RECEIVED Ic Tom Samuels OCT 1 1 2013 —RAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENr AGENCY O.M.B. No. 3067-0077 NATIONAL • O:• , tit• . :«. PROGRAM Expires1J. ELEVATION CERTIFICATE EILEEN FLAHERTY BUILDING STREET ADDRESS (indu ft Apt, Unff, Sine. amlfor Bldg. No) OR P.O. ROUtE AND BOX NO. Company NAIC Numtser INLET WAY CITE' - STATE ZIP CODE SOUfHOLD NY 11971 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (Lot and Bb& Nrurd)ers, Tax Parcel Number, Legal DaKWhon, etc.) 1000-92-01-08 BLIMING USE (ag Resided, Nawes der" Adcftn Aooessm , etc. Use a Caffmwb area, if ne�ry.) LAL LATrrUDElLONGrrUDE (OPTIONAL) HORIZONTAL DATUM: SOURCE GPS (rype):_ ( #ir-W-##.#fF or 11#� [I NAD 1927 [1Quad NAD 1983 ❑ USGS Map ® Other. SECTIION B- FLOOD IWAUNCE RATE MAP (FIRM) INFORMATION I SOUn,10 O,TOWNOF360813 I - NY 134MAPANDPAN@. B5.SUFFD( B7.RRMPAIE 139. BASE RDW ELWATtON(S) NUMBER B6. FIRM 0M EFFECTNE41EVMDATE BB. FOD LOZONE(S) 9weA0, u d offt tlr ft 36 69 G 998 � uay. Umt, tcuroawnzuuu;omarkmEwaMtgrt)caaaDasemooacqmenterHllO. ❑ FIS Profile ® FIRM ❑ Corumunity Determined ❑ Odw p e); B11.In theebvabaadatum used fornteBFEinW.NNGVD19M ❑NAVD1988 ❑08w(Desaibe): B1ECEI�/E® 2 is ttte loud b a Coastal Barrier Resor m CBRSS error Protected Area OPA . ❑ Yes ®No ' 4 SC-CTION C - BIALDING ELWATION B+IFORMATKIN (StiRVEY ) C1.8&%Vdevatsaebasedon:0Carrsauc mDrawatgs' ®BungWdwCxaucW ®FamedCmMidm U U 7 TIT 2 113 'A new Elevation Cew� be tegdred when corrsimrctian afthe bt�drng � C2 Bing Diagram Nwnber8 (Select the bidldeng diagram mosl�larb the brdlctrigtbrwidctn ii'ds oertifirdte � bating aarrpletari -seepages 6 arai amwatelyrepresebftb ,pr�vibaseftor .) � OF APPEALS C3. BeQbz—Zones Al -A30, AE, AH, A (with BFE), VE, V1 --V30, V (witir BFE), AR, ARIA, ARAE, ARIAI-M, ARIAii, AR(AO Complete- Items C3.-ai bekw aoo rift to the Uft diagran speaW in Item C2 Siate the datum used. N to ftm is diffena thum the datum used forthe BFE in Section B, amvertttre datum b that rased brthe BFE. Showtield meastae Tett and dation conversion c dadatian. Lbethe space provided orthe Cammtems area of SeotimD orSectim G, as approp ft lodwument6ne datum conversion. Datum NGVD Ca wasiortFCommnnts Elevation rnkrnoe mark used . Does the eleaft r+efem mark used appearon the FIRM? ❑ Yes O No o a)Topcfbofloniba(mductrngbasoneaorencbM) 3.4ft(m) o b) Top ofrexth4wfbor 6.1t(m)w o c)BA nc)fknNedhainMgnx mertder(Vmnesardy) _ tt(m) 2 o d) Attadted9�(topastab) NO) 6 o e)LamesteWafiOnafmzNntrrarylore*pmnent w 41 a semiickng the burg (Describe b a Camkrnerris area) 6.3ft(m) a m ® Q LIGNest a*imt @Wwo grade (LAG) i. 9.140) z' 0 9)(9aide1HAG 6.9ft(m)I cc o h) No of pemrarWcpg*gs (ifood vents)m tiro 1 ft abomacfjmM g ade 5 o ij Tdai area of a8 Pemnarrent opmbW (tiood vends) fn C3h sq. h (sq. an) SgL' M D -SL RVEYOR, OR CERTIP(CATION This auffficahon is to besigned and sealed by a land surveyor, engineer, or architect auft sized by law to certify elevation infomtadon. I cedifyMai the information in Seasons A< Q and Con this ceffbafe represents mybad elfods to interpret the data avabble. 1 understand that any Use statement may be punishable byline orsmpdso nwgunder 18 U.S. Code, Seaton 1001 CEKnRERS NAME J" T. MErMM LICENSE NUMBER 49618 ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE P.O. BOX 909 n SOWHOLD NY 11971 0317//05 (631)7ff5,502D FEMA Fonn 81-31, 3UL 00 SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR CONTINUATION REPLACES ALL PREVIOUS EDITIONS BOARD MEMBERS Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Eric Dantes Gerard P. Goehringer George Horning Ken Schneider May 16, 2013 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road -P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex iFirst Floor, Capital One Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown.nortbfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 'NOWT DE SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 O Fax (631) 765-9064 RE: Flaherty ZBA#6583 —Amended Decision Dear Ms. Moore: OCT 2 2 2013 The Zoning Board is in receipt of the transcript for the hearing on Flaherty before the Department of State; Code Division,'Board of Review. The Zoning Board of Appeals voted at their Special Meeting on May 16, 2013, to amend their original decision #5583 based on the relief granted by the Department of State Board of Review in the hearing transcript of April 11, 2013 where that Board granted relief from the code required two feet of freeboard and conditioned the existing attached garage by requiring the installation of flood venting. Since the existing garage will no longer be detached from the principal dwelling, as originally applied for, the amended decision.reflects approval for the elimination of the two original conditions imposed requiring the removal of existing habitable space in the garage and the removal of the existing tub/shower from the existing bathroom, as required by code for accessory structures. Attached is a copy of the amended decision for your records, the original of which was filed with the Town Clerk regarding the above variance application. If you have any questions, please call1he office. Si�erely, Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Zoning Board of Appeals Encl. Cc: Building Department Samuels & Steelman, Architects RX Date/Time Mlkcl& 08:15 6317659064 P.001 05/22/2013 07:59 6317659064 ZONINGBDOFAPPEALS PAGE 01/04 BOARD MEMBERS Leslie Danes Weisman, Chairperson Fric Dances Gerard P. Goehringer George Homing ICen Schneider Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road m .RO.13ox 1179 Southold, NY 1 1 971-0959 -Of—Lp.caJio)1: Town Annex /First Floor, Capital One Bank 54375 Ruin Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 http://sotitboldtown.northfork.net D ZONING BOARD OF APPF—ALS 'OWN OF S0UTHOLD Tel. (631) 7651809 a Fax (631) 765.9064 FOCT 2 2 2013 FINDINGS, )i D)CLl(DERATIONS AIND IDETERMINA MIUTI NG OF MAY 16, 2013 ZRA FILE. 6583 AMENDED NAM -13 OF APPLICANT: Vincent and :Eileen Flaheaty SCTM: 1000-92-1-8 PROPERTY LOCATION: 470 Inlet Way (adj. to Fairhaven Inlet, The Inlet and Little Peconic Bay), Southold, NY SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls raider the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 1414 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated July 17, 2012 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county -wide or inter-eoriilnunity in'tpact. i eWRP Dj TI RNITNATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency 1•cvicw of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated July 24, 2012. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Forni submitted to this department, as woll as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. PROPERTY I--ACTS/DESCRIPTION• The Applicants' property is an irregularly shaped 1.15 acre waterfront parcel in the R-40 Zone The northerly lot line measures +/- 4 1. 0 feet adjacent to the ROW named Inlet Way, and to the waters of Fairhaven Inlet. The easterly lot line measures .1./- 173.58 feet, and is partly bulk headed adjacent. to Fairhaven Inlet. The southerly lot line measures +/- 441.17 feet, and has a wooden bulkhead along its entire length adjacent to .Little Peconic Bay. Tile westerly lot line measures 38.56 Leet adjacent to a short extension of Inlet Way. The property is improved with a single family dwelling, a semi -attached accessory garage, decks, and a swimming pool with deck, as shown., with proposed alterations and additions, on the site .pian survey drawn by Samuels & Steelman, Architects, dated .lune 25, 2012, last revision dated Aug. 6, 2012. BASIS_OF APPLi_CATiON: Request for Variances f•om Article XXII Code Section 280-116 and /Article Ili Code Section 280-1.5 based on an application for building permit and the Building Inspector's April 30, 2012 Notice of Disapproval concerning permit to construction additions and alterations to a Single family dwelling, at: 1) proposed construction at less than the code required bulkhead'serback of 75 feet, 2) upon construction accessory garage will he Incated in other than the code roqu ired rear yard. RELIEF R5' U.E5TED• The Applicants request a variance to renovate the existing dwelling located ata 16.1 feet setback frorn the bulkhead, whereas 75 feet is required by Town Code, and request another variance to locate an accessory garage in a side yard, by removing a breeze way that currently attaches the structure to the principal �'-moi 1 � t!r' .�' �C'-•r �,• RX Date/Time 0512212 08:15 6317659064 P.002 05/22/2013 07:59 6317659064 ZONINGBDOFAPPEALS' PAGE 02/04 Parc 2 of 4 - Mnyl (,, 2013 Arncjidal Zt3A Fiia(,,583 - Flaherty CM: 1600.92.1-9 struoture, when Town Code requires accessory structures to be located in a rear yard area, or in the case of waterfront property'a. -front yard location, provided it meets the principal setback required in the zone district. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The Applicant .has obtained a Town Board of Trustees permit for the proposed .construction. The Trustees established a 15 fool: nen turf buffer adjacent to shoreline areas on the property. The /applicant's existing single family dwelling was built prior to the Town's adoption of its Zoning Code, and has a valid pre-existing CO. The garage currently has a valid CO as part of the principal dwelling, which becomes a nullity once the garage is detached from the principal dwelling_ More specifically, once the garage is detached from the principle dwelling it becomes a non -conforming accessory stricture, as opposed to being part of the principal dwelling. The garage also contains habitable space on the second floor, which was permitted as part of the principal dwelling when the garage was.a.t.tached to the principal dwelling, but is not permitted in an accessory garage once it becomes detached. The applicant's do not wish to apply for an accessory apartment in a.n.accessory building due to the -fact this is not their primary residence. The Applicants have submitted a written agreement with the Cedar Beach Park Association that "grants the Flaherty's an easement to maintain that portion of the garage that is shown on the aforesaid survcy as encroaching upon Inlet 'Way." As a part of the proposed renovations, the Applicants will remove a 3rd fioor.tower currently existing on the principal structure. AMENDED INFORMATION: The Applicant applied to New York State: Department of State, Code Division for relief from the Stato required freeboard of two :feet to be added to a building where the design flood elevation or other elevation requirements tire specified. On April 11, 2013, the applicant presented their case and received variance relief Ps. requested providing that the applicant install :flood venting to the garage. FINDINGS OF FACT/-RJASQNS FOR BOARD'ACTTON: The Zoning Board of Appeals hold a public heating.on this application on August 2, 2012, at which time written and oral evidence'were presented_ Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal' inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence, the Zoning Board rinds the :following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. 'd'®w>a'Layu X267-b13).(b)(li). Grant of the varianecs will not produce ar, undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detrim6nt to nearby properties. The existing principal building setbacks will remain, with 116 significant alteration of these setbacks created by the proposed construction. The attached garage was conforming when it was built, -but actually became non -conforming under current Code due'to changes in the Code relating to how it is physically attached to the principal structure. Whether ail -ached or detached, a garage is a customary accessory structure in a residelttial Zone. The detached garage will remain at its exact location without any changes to the setbacks. 2. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b) . The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by sonic method, feasible Cot, the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The principal structure has a pre-existing non -conforming; set back from the bulkhead', therefore the proposed constnlction requires variance relief The proposed detached garage will be located in its existing side yard area, not in a Code required area, and therefore requires a variance to be detached from the principal structure. 3 Town Law.X267-b(3)(b)(3)- The variance granted' herein for the 16 feet bulkhead setback for tite existing principal structure is mathematically substantial, representing +78% variance relief from the 75 feet required by Code. However, this dwelling ,has a pre-existing nonconforming status, and furthermore. can not feasibly be moved, or derl'tolished and rebuilt in a Code conforming'location. The variance granted for tho garage in a side yard, location is 100% variance relief from the Code required rear yard or front yard location for waterfront properly. However,,the detached garage will notbe moved or enlarged, and will have basically the same footprint as it did when'attached to the principal structure. 4. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(4). No .evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an'adverse impact on the physieat or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The RX Date/Time 05ia=� 08:15 05/22/2013 07:59 6317659064 Pap oP4 — May 11, 20]3 Arnondcd 7_BA FROG583 - Vlahc.q C'N; IDoo-92-1..8 6317659064 ZONINGBDOFAPPEALS P.003 PAGE 03/04 applicant most comply with Chapter 236' of the Town's Storm Water Mail s.getncnt: Cade and has shown the necessary drywells on the updated survey, 5^ Town Law 267-b 3 b 5 . The difficulty for the Applicant in regard to the proposed renovatioais to the principal structure laas not been self created, but is due to the pre-existing building setbacks established when it was originally constructed prior'to Zoning Code. The difficulty for the Applicant in regard to the proposed detaching of the garage has beet! self-created bedause the Applicant could conceivably choose to continue to keep the garage attached to the single family dwelling. 6• Town Law §L67 -b. Grant of the requested `relief is the minimum action necessary and -adequate enable the applicant to enjoy tine benefit ofAlteratlons and additions to the principal sl.rucWre, and the benefit of .having an accessory garage rather than (Ian attached garage, white preserving and protecting the character of the neighbor) cod and the health, safety and welfare of the community RESO.i_U11ON OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and, applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-$; motion was offered by Member Horning, seconded'by Member Dinizio, and duly carried, to . GRA file variances as applied for, and shown on the sutvey drawn by Samuels & Steelman, Architects, dated .June 25, 2012, last revision dated Aug. 6, 2012 subiect to the.fotlowing conditions; CONDITIONS 1 There will .be no'kitchen bpdroorns or )iva.ble space in the accessory garage 2 Bathroom fixtures ill the garAgee will conform to those permitted by ,town Code for an accessory structure A1VlIChME D UESO][.U"IrION OI THE E4)XIdD: hila considering all of the above factors anti applying the balancing test under New York `Y'owvan Law 267-H, motion was offered by Member Weisman, Chairperson seconded by Member Goehrin.ger, and duly carried, to RE' MOVE THE ORIGINA.1L COND)t"tIONS A�PD GRANT, the variances as applied fo :, and shIo waa on the survey drawn by Samuels aha Steelman, Architects," dated .lune 25, 2012, last revYiaiou dated AA@g. 6, 2012 subiect to the fsolloaving condition: 1. There will be 110 kitchen permitted in the accessory gRAI age That the above conditions be written into the I3uilding %Ia,sreClor's Certificate of Occupancy,. -when issued. Aray deviation fr^orn the survey, .rite plata andlor architectural drenvinis, cited in this decision will re,strlt r""fir delcrys gmdlor a possible denial by the Bixilding Department of a building permit; and may require'a new rapplicaw6n, and public hearing before the Zoning Board of 4. Any,devi6tfon, front the variance(s) granted herein as shown on rhe architectural drervvings, site plait and/or survey' cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions,, are not authorized unddr this application vvhera involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone arty current or fitntre Uce, setback or other fearure of the subject properly' that may violate the ?aping Code, other Than such yeses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board. resei-ves the right to substitute a similar design that is do miintmis in stature for an alterdtion that does not increase the degree of nonrotxrormitj�, RX Date/Time 05122, 3 05/22/2013 07:59 6317659064 Poeo 4 of 4 - jWZy 16, 2013 Anwj74ed T.13A 147106583 - TjoI?erty CI'A4- 1000-92-1-8 03:15 6317659064 ZONINGBDOFAPPEALS P.004 PAGE 04/04 Mote oJ' [ha board: Ayes: Members Acting Chai772.ennn Coehringer, Dinisio, 116mixq, Absent wee. Chairperson N1o0manr and Momh,(?r 5chnoder, This Resolution wos dally adapted (3-0). AMENDEED mote of Ilse Board: Ayes: Members Wdsn:mt (Cbnlrperson), Goollringer, Scitrletdoo. IlorR/nfyy. j%mber Anttte.6 (RJ)St(tined. This Resolution N as duly adopted (4-0), Leslie I euros Weisman, Chairperson Approved for Eili��g`j�/a/ /2013 BOARD MEMBERS Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson James Dinizio, Jr. Gerard P. Goehringer George Horning Ken Schneider so ®� cou http://southoldtown.jiorthforl,.net Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road o P.O. Box 1179 Southold; NY 11971-0959 Off ce Location: Town Annex /First Floor, Capital One Bank 54375 .Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) ED - ,.,IVY 11971FF ZONING BOARD Off'+ APPEALS 0 I! TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OCT 2 2 2013 Tel, (631) 765-1809 o Fax (631) 765-9064 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 20, 2012 ZBA FILE: 6583 NAME OF APPLICANT: Vincent and Eileen Flaherty SCTM: 1000-92-1-8 PROPERTY LOCATION: 470 Inlet Way (adj. to Fairhaven Inlet, The Inlet and Little Peconic Bay), Southold, NY SRQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under zonsideration in this application and determines that this review,falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated July 17, 201.2 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county -wide or inter -community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated July 24, 2012. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The Applicants' property is an irregularly shaped 1.15 acre waterfront parcel in the RAO Zone. The northerly lot line measures +/- 410 feet adjacent to the ROW named Inlet Way, and to the waters of Fairhaven Inlet. The easterly lot line measures +/- 173.58 feet, and is partly bulk headed adjacent to Fairhaven Inlet. The southerly lot line measures +/- 441.17 feet, and has a wooden bulkhead along its entire length adjacent to Little Peconic Bay. The westerly lot line measures 38.56 feet adjacent to a short extension of Inlet Way. The property is improved with a single family dwelling, a semi -attached accessory garage, decks, and a swimming pool with deck, as shown, with proposed alterations and additions, on the site plan survey drawn by Samuels & Steelman, Architects, dated June 25, 2012, last revision dated Aug. 6, 2012. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article XXII Code Section 280-116 and Article III Code Section 280-15 based on an application for building permit and the Building Inspector's April 30, 2012 Notice of Disapproval concerning permit to construction additions and alterations to a single family dwelling, at: 1) proposed construction at less than the code required bulkhead setback of 75 feet, 2) upon construction accessory garage will be located in other than the code required rear yard. RELIEF REQUESTED: The Applicants request a variance to renovate the existing dwelling located at a 16.1 feet setback from the bulkhead, whereas 75 feet is required by Town Code, and request another variance to locate an accessory garage in a side yard, by removing a breezeway that currently attaches the structure to the principal Page 2 of 3 -- September 20, 2012 ZBA File#6583 - Flaherty CTIvi. 1000-92-1-8 structure, when Town Code requires accessory structures to be located in a rear yard area, or in the case of waterfront property a front yard location, provided it meets the principal setback required in the zone district. ADDITIONAL INFORMA'T'ION: The Applicant has obtained a Town Board of Trustees permit for the proposed construction. The Trustees established a 15 foot non turf buffer adjacent to shoreline areas on the property. The Applicant's existing single family dwelling was built prior to the Town's adoption of its Zoning Code, and has a valid pre-existing CO. The garage currently has a valid CO as part of the principal dwelling, which becomes a nullity once the garage is detached from the principal dwelling. More specifically, once the garage is detached from the principle dwelling it becomes a non -conforming accessory structure, as opposed to being part of the principal dwelling. The garage also contains habitable space on the second floor, which was permitted as part of the principal dwelling when the garage was attached to the principal dwelling, but is not permitted in an accessory garage once it becomes detached. The applicant's do not wish to apply for an accessory apartment in an accessory building due to the fact this is not their primary residence. The Applicants have submitted a written agreement with the Cedar Beach Park Association that "grants the Flaherty's an easement to maintain that portion of the garage that is shown on the aforesaid survey as encroaching upon Inlet Way." As a part of the proposed renovations, the Applicants will remove a 3" floor tower currently existing on the principal structure. FINDINGS OF FACT/ REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: 7"he Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on August 2, 2612, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the fol [owing findings: 1. _Town Law k267-b(3)(b)(1)Grant of the variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The existing principal building setbacks will remain, with no significant alteration of these setbacks created by the proposed construction. The attached garage was conforming when it was built, but actually became non -conforming under current Code due to changes in the Code relating to how it is physically attached to the principal structure. Whether attached or detached, a garage is a customary accessory structure in a residential Zone. The detached garage will remain at its exact location without any changes to the setbacks. 2. Town Law &267-b 3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The principal structure has a pre-existing non -conforming set back from the bulkhead, therefore the proposed construction requires variance relief The proposed detached garage will be located in its existing side yard area, not in a Code required area, and therefore requires a variance to be detached from the principal structure. 3. Town Law $267-b(3)(b)(3) The variance granted herein for the 16 feet bulkhead setback for the existing principal structure is mathematically substantial, representing +78% variance relief from the 75 feet required by Code. However, this dwelling has a pre-existing nonconforming status, and furthermore, can not feasibly be moved, or demolished and rebuilt in a Code conforming location. The variance granted for the garage in a side yard location is 100% variance relief from the Code required rear yard or front yard location for waterfront property. However, the detached garage will not be moved or enlarged, and will have basically the same footprint as it did when attached to the principal structure. 4. Town Law X267-b(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code and has shown the necessary drywells oil the updated survey. 5. Town Law 5267-b(3)(b)(5) The difficulty for the Applicant in regard to the proposed renovations to the principal structure has not been self-created, but is due to the pre-existing building setbacks established when it was 0 Page 3 of 3 - September 20, 2012 ZBA Fileti6583 - Flaherty CTM. 1000-92-1-8 originally constructed prior to Zoning Code. The difficulty for the Applicant in regard to the proposed detaching of the garage has been self-created because the Applicant could conceivably choose to continue to keep the garage attached to the single family dwelling. 6. Town Lary U67 -b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of alterations and additions to the principal structure, and the benefit of having an accessory garage rather than an attached garage, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-13, motion was offered by Member Horning, seconded by Member Dinizio, and duly carried, to GRANT, the variances as applied for, and shown on the survey drawn by Samuels & Steelman, Architects, dated June 25, 2012, last revision dated Aug. 6, 2012. CONDITIONS: 1. There will be no kitchen, bedrooms or livable space in the accessory garage. 2. Bathroom fixtures in the garage will conform to those permitted by Town Code for an accessory structure. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificateof Occupancy; when issued Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new applicatiotr and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Auy deviation from the variances) granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, ,site plan andtor survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconforTnities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature af' the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other f atitres as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de rninimis in nature for an.alteration that does not increase the degree ofnonconforrnity. Dote of the Board: Aves- Members Acting Chairperson Goehringer, Dinizio, Horning. Absent was Chairperson Weisman and tt9ernber Schneider This Resolution was duly adopted (3-0) w6-erard P. Goehringer, Acti Chai Approved for filing / / /201 ti ., Office Use Only Coastal Erosion Permit Application Wetland Permit Application Administrative Permit _Amendment/Transfer/Extension Received Application: Received Fee:$ Completed Application O d91 /3 _Incomplete _SEQRA Classification: Type I Type II Unlisted _Coordination:(date sent) LWRP Consistency A sessment Form I �[ CAC Referral Sent / I (Date of Inspection: _Receipt of CAC Report: _Lead Agency Determination: _Technical Review: YPublic Hearing Held: 11 _Resolution: Name of Applicant. OCT 2 2 2013 5uV{Va 1C -'y 1 W o s� e3 gP9 11 -cc- -Vn 10_;1.1t ue 1.S/ '+rCA1,769 duri j P&A (01 ®C_'eo-r®nn &P IVI3113 . Eileen and Vincent J. Flaherty Address 10 West St., New York, NY 10004 ]Phone Number:( ) Suffolk County 'Tax Map Number: 1000 - 9 2 - 01- 0 8 Property Location: 470 Inlet Way, Southold, NY 11971 (provide LILCO Pole #, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: Tom Samuels- Samuels and Steelman Architects (If applicable) Address: 25235 Main Rd. Cutchogue, NY 11935 Phone: 734-6405 ` Board of Trustees Application GENERAL DATA Land Area (in square feet): 50,094 Area Zoning: R-40 Previous use of property: Residential Intended use of property: Residential Covenants and Restrictions: Yes x No If "Yes", please provide copy. Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals x Yes No If "Yes", please provide copy of decision. Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency mate No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? X No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary): Demolition of existing residence and construction of new structure with addition of a subsurface drainage system for rain water runoff for the residence and existing driveway i Board of Trustees Application WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: Demolition of an existing residence and construction of new residence with an. addition of a subsurface drainage system for rain- water runoff for the residence and existing driveway Area of wetlands on lot: square feet Percent coverage of lot: % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: 2 8 f - 1 11 feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: 461 feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? No X Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated?, How much material will be filled? 0 65 cubic yards _cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: 5 feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Backhoe/bulldozer I Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): None 6I Z2® Appendix B Short Environmental ANsessment Form Instructions for ComyletiiIIn2 I Part I - Project Infformation. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part I - Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: The Flaherty Residence Project Location (describe, and attach a location map): 470 Inlet Way, Southold, NY 11971 Brief Description of Proposed Action: Demolition of an existing residence and construction of new residence in existing footprint with limited additions, with an addition of a subsurface drainage system for rainwater runoff for the residence and existing driveway. Name of Applicant or Sponsor= Tom Samuels Telephone: 631.-734-6405 Samuels and Steelman Archiects E -Mail: Address: 25235 Main Rd. City/Po: Cutchgoue State: Zip Code: NY 11935 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, NO YES administrative rule, or regulation? If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that F may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval: NYS DEC, ZBA, all approved 3.a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 1.15 acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? n _ in acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on, adjoining and near the proposed action. [j Urban ❑ Rural (non -agriculture) E] -Industrial E]Commercial MltesidentW (suburban) ©Forest DAgriculture ❑Aquatic ®other (specify): ❑ Parkland Page I of 4 5. Is the proposed action, a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? NO YES N/A ❑ © ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? NO YES ® F] 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes, identify: NO YES ❑ ❑ 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? b. Are public transportation service(s) available at or near the site of the proposed action? c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? NO YES ❑ ® ❑ 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: NO YES 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? If No, describe method for providing potable water: NO YES ❑ E I l . Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: NO YES ❑ 12. a. Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic Places? b. Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? NO YES E ❑ ® ❑ 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency? b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: NO YES ® ❑ Fx] ❑ 14. Identify the typical, habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: ®Shoreline ®Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional [Wetland El Urban [Z Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? NO YES E Q 16. Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES x 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources? If Yes, Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? RX NO ®YES b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)? If Yes, briefly describe: E] NO DYES New drywells as shown on Site Plan NO YES' Ela. Page 2 of 4 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of water or other liquids (e.g. retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)? If Yes, explain purpose and size: NO YES ❑ F1 to Barge impact impact may 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste management facility? If Yes, describe: NO YES occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 20. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: NO YES 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? F1 El 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? I AFJFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: Date: Signature: Part 2 - Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion off Part 2. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part I and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept "Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" Page 3 of 4 No, or Moderate small to Barge impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? F1 El 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit, biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a. public / private water supplies? b. public / private wastewater treatment utilities? S. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic, archaeological, ❑ architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources (e.g., wetlands, waterbodies, groundwater, air quality, flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 ](Dart 3 - Determination of significance. The Lead .Agency is responsible for the completion of tart 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and cumulative impacts. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Town of Southold - Board of Trustees Name of Lead Agency Date J M r� F, OC 9 A) President Print or 1�6pe Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer of Responsible 6fficerKead Agency Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) PRINT Page 4 of 4 No, or ]Moderate small to large x I, ](Dart 3 - Determination of significance. The Lead .Agency is responsible for the completion of tart 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and cumulative impacts. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Town of Southold - Board of Trustees Name of Lead Agency Date J M r� F, OC 9 A) President Print or 1�6pe Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer of Responsible 6fficerKead Agency Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) PRINT Page 4 of 4 No, or ]Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion, flooding or drainage Z problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? ](Dart 3 - Determination of significance. The Lead .Agency is responsible for the completion of tart 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and cumulative impacts. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Town of Southold - Board of Trustees Name of Lead Agency Date J M r� F, OC 9 A) President Print or 1�6pe Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer of Responsible 6fficerKead Agency Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) PRINT Page 4 of 4 PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE - ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: Address: o o eo c l low �U E Ali VN( ��� Postage $ $1,32 X j Certified Fee $3.10 n O C3(Endorsement Return Receipt Fee Post Required) $2, ;rt@ ® Restricted Delivery Fee �� 1J0) (Endorsement Required) $4, W 1�� X ' In Total Postage & Fees $ $bo r-3 r -i Sent To � r r'-. -------------------- street, Apt. No.; ��/-� D or PO Box No. 1 t1ar6j \ ! icw �-------------- STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK 3800 [See Reverse fo _Instructions residing at ��� (),S-jg& l Av�-- ��^-e-��' , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the day of 0 20_g_, deponent mailed a- true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at , that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by CERTIFIED MAIL/RETURN RECEIPT. Sworn t e re me this — IA Day of 20 L'�-�Uc — Notary Public c®J4STANcE, L*0Wvjr ,�-N®TARY PdB'LIC•STA?E OF NXW yORo No. 0111611®900 4�udl&lfed rh Surf®Ik County ¢ y; onnehl al�r�. E Ue, J$ 4-.01: 2018 James F. King, President Bob Ghosio, Jr. , Vice -President ~►- Dave Bergen . John Bredemeyerp� Michael J Domino BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN ,OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ------------------------------------------ In the Matter of the Application of EILEEN & VINCENT J. FLAHERTY COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) Town Hall, 53095 Main Rd. P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING TO BE COMPLETED AFTER POSTING REMAINS IN PLACE FOR EIGHT DAYS residing at /dba ;e being duly sworn, depose and say: That on the �;- day of J� � m , 201I perso ally osted the property known as by placing the Board of Trustees official poster where it cane'easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for eight days prior to the date of the public hearing. Date of hearing noted thereon to be held Wednesday, November 13, 2013. Dated: �i /,.2-/ 1-3 (sign(ure) Sworn to before me this P_day ofA61 2013 PATRICIA RiCHAROS �_ / Notary Public, State of New York I No. 01816042467 otary Public Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Ekpires May 30,9002-2-61 � NOTICE OF, HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES , t the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, NewYork,•Jthisproperty. ;.rd of Trustees Applicati— AUT1HIORMAT]ION (where the applicanfis not the owner) Eileen and Vincent J. 1, Flaherty residing at 10 West St., New York, NY 10004 (print owner of property) (mailing address) do hereby authorize Tom S amue 1 s �tigent) Tom Samuels. of Samuels and Steelman Architects to apply for permit(s) from the Southold Board of Town Trustees on my behalf. / (Owner's signature) 5 —.;.ard of Trustees Appliceti,aa County of Suffolk State of New York Eileen and Vincent J. Flaherty BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. S' nater - SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF�o,20 Notary Public f PATRICIA R1CHW'!1*3,.*3, fttnry Public, State of momma yore No. ®I 866®42467 OWSr`s€red in Suffolk County APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DESCLOSUR E FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: Samuels, Thomas C. (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of -someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Variance Change of Zone Approval of plat Exemption from plat or official map Other (If "Other", name the activity.) Building Trustee X Coastal Erosion Mooring Planning Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO X If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicant/agent/representative) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply): A) the owner of greater than 5% of -the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non -corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this 10 day of 2,K Signature eZa Print Name Th6mas C. Samuels Form TS 1 d FORM a 06/10 No., ®I RIS042467 Quaflf ed on Suffolk County Commission Expives May 3®, TIC)) Ll . tyO� rn a Erosion, SedinAentati®n & Storm -Water ilAn-®ff ASSESSMENT FORM PROPERTY LOCA' ION: s:C.T.II. #: THE FOILL OVENG ACTIONS MAY REQUIRE THE SUBMISSION OF A 1000 92 01 08 STORM-WATERi,GRAOING, DRAINAGE AND EE ZSION CONTROL Pi.AN 010 "dol es bTs$fo4Section CERTIFIED BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. IN THE STATE OF NEW, YORK SCOPE OF WORK - PROPOSED CONSTRUC`n®N # / WORK ASSESSMENT Yes No a. What is the Total Area of the Project Parcels? Will this Project Retain All Storm -Water Run -Off (include Total Area of all Parcels located within 5 0 , 0 9 4 s f Generated by a Two (2") Inch Rainfall on Site? the Scope of Work for Proposed Construction) (s.F. f Aces) (This item will include all run-off created by site X b. What is the total Area of Land Clearing clearing and/or Construction activities as well as all ---- and/or Ground Disturbance for the proposed 1,290 s f . Site Improvements and the permanent creation of construction activity? impervious surfaces.) (S,F./toes) 2 Does the,Site Plan and/or Survey Show AM Proposed PROVIDE BRIEF PROJECT DFSCRIIP'I'dON (ProvideAddidmrarPagesasNeeileiq Drainage Structures indicating Size B, Location? This Item shall include all Proposed Grade Changes and X' — Demolition of existing residence Slopes Controlling Surface Water Flow. Does the Site Plan and/or Survey describe the erosion and reconstruction and sediment control practices that will be, used to X Control site. erosion and storm water discharges. This — — of residence,with an addition. of a iternmust bemaintained throughout the Entire Construction Period. subsurface drainage system for Will this Project Require any Land Filling, Grading or Excavation where there is a. change to the Natural X rain water runoff for the .residence Existing Grade Involving morethan 200Cubic Yards — of Material within any Parcel? and existing driveway Will thisApplication Require Land Disturbing Activities Encompassing an Area in Excess of Five Thousand X (5,000 S.F.) Square Feet of Ground Surface? 6 Is there a Natural Water Course Running through the Site? Is this Project within the Trustees jurisdiction El or within One Hundred (100') feet of a Wetland or — General DECSWPPPRectuirements: Submission of a SWPPP is required for all Construction activities involving soil Beach? disturbances.of one (1) or more acres; including disturbances of less'.than one acre that 7 Will there be Site preparation on Existing Grade Slopes are part of a larger common plan that will ultimately disturb one or more acres of land; which Exceed Fifteen (IS) feet of Vertical Rise to 0 1 X including Construction activities involving poll disturbances of less than one (1) acre where One Hurid[ed,(100') of Horizontal Distance? — — the DEC has determined that a SPDES permit Is required for storm water discharges (SWPPP's Shall meet the Minimum Requirements of the SPOES General Permit 8 Will Driveways, Parking Areas or other Impervious for Storm Water Discharges from Construction activity - Permit Pio. GP -0.10-001.)_ Surfaces be Sloped to Direct Storm -Water Run -Off X 1. The SWPPP shall be prepared prior to the submittal of the NOL: The Not shall be into and/or in the direction of a Town right of -way? — — submitted to the Department prior to the commencement of construction activity. 2. The SWPPP shall describe the erosion and sediment control practices and where 9 Will this Project Require the Placement of Material, required, post -construction storm water management practices that will be used and/or Removal of Vegetation and/or the COnstmellon of any 0X constructed to reduce the pollutants in stonnwater discharges and to assure Item Within the Town Right -of -Way or Road Shoulder — compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit In addition, the SWPPP shall identify potential sources of pollution which may reasonably be expected to affect the Area? iTLis item will NOT Include the Installation of Driveway Aprons.) quality of storm water discharges. NOTE: If Arty Answar to Questions One through Nine is Answered with a Check Mark 3. AN SWPPPs that require the post -construction storm water management practice component shall be prepared by a qualified Design Professional Licensed in New York in a Box and,the construction site disturbance is between 5,000 S.F. & 1 Acre in area, a Storm Water, Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan is Required by the Town of that is knowledgeable in the principles and practices of Stoma .WaterManagement Southold and Must be Submitted for Review Prior to Issuance of Any Building Parmit (NOTE: A Check Mark (99) and/or Answer for each question is Required for a Complete Application) STAr"E OF NEWYORK, Suffolk COUNTY OF ........................................... SS S afilue 15...... being duly sworn, deposes and says that he/she is the applicant for Permit;, That I, .,,Thomas C 'Samuels...... ........................................................... (Name of individual signing Document) And that he/she is theArchitect.....................:............. .............................................................................................................................:. .. (Owner, Contractor, Agent, Corporate Officer, eta) Owner and/or representative✓_ of the Owner or Owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and isle this application; that all statements contained in this application are true to the bestofhis'knowledge and belief; and that the work -will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed herewith. Sworn to'before, me this; ay ............... ......... of.. ......................,20..3 Notiuy PubIi ..... ��rii.3%.1�Cs ....................:.0.......................................... .... ®tS 1�8�bl@C StS E (Signature ofAppfrcanl) FORM a 06/10 No., ®I RIS042467 Quaflf ed on Suffolk County Commission Expives May 3®, TIC)) Ll . Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards ,and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 92 - 01 - 08 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board 0 Planning Dept. ' 0 Building Dept. E Board of Trustees 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital E construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) 0 (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification:rX Nature and extent of action: Demolition of existing residence and construction of new residence with an addition of a subsurface drainaqe system for rain water runoff for the residence and existing drivewa Location of action: 470 Inlet Way, Southold, NY 11971 Site acreage: 1. 15 AC Present land use: Single Family Residence Present zoning classification: R-40 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Eileen and Vincent J. Flaherty (b) Mailing address: 10 West St., New York, NY 10004 (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( ) (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes X❑ No ❑ If yes, which state or federal agency? NYS DEC DEVELOPED CONST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, mares beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LVVRP Section III — Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. 0 Yes No Not Applicable Reconstructing a residence in same footprint preserves open space around the existing residence and makes efficient use of the property. Also development of the property is far less than the 200 lot coverage allowed Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes 0 No 0 Not Applicable There are no historic or archeological structures on property. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section tllg — Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ® Yes 7 No 0 Not Applicable The proposed structure is in keeping with the style of all neighboring structures Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST PO LICK ES Policy 4. Mininnize floss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section M — Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ® Yes 0 No [�] Not AppRicabie All rainwater runoff is and will be retained on site with the use of underground dryiaells. During construction hay bales will be placed between the construction and the shore, to keep runoff spoils on the site. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LVVIIP Section M — Policies Pages 16 through 21 ffor evaluation criteria ® Yes 0 No 1E Not Applicable All rainwater runoff is and will be retained within the upland, by use of underground drywells. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. F Yes 0 No ® Not Applicable No development will take place in the "protected" or "natural i'ndiginous environment". Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWR.P Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Not ApplicabRe The development will not add pollutants into the air. All construction vehicles meet the.Federal standards for air pollution discharge. The mechanical systems of the residence meet the federal standards for'air pollution discharge Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LVVRP Section III — Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. © Yes 1:1No ❑ Not Applicable The construction and use of the residence will- make use of the town's disposal and recycling center. All waste water "sanitary" is discharged into an approved SCDHS sanitary system PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LVVRP Section III — Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. © YesD leo ❑ loot Applicable No public land involved.'Littoral access unimpeded. Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water -dependent uses and promote siting of new water -dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 47 through 56 ffor evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No R Not Applicable There are no public or commercial activities or uses on site. Historically this property and neighboring properties are residential in use and will remain rtaidL-ntial_ Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of laving marine resources in Long Island Sound, .the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP- Section III — Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ® Yes 1:1 No 1:1Not'Applicahle This project will protect and preserve the living marine resources by maintaining all rainwater discharge and sanitary flow from the residence on site by approved SCDHS sanitary system and drywells for rainwater runoff. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lanais in the Town of Southold. See LVVRP Section III — Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable There are no agricultural lands on site. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See iLWItP Section III — Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. © Yes ❑ Ido ❑ Not Applicable The construction will be using equipment approved by the Federal government for energy usage. The residence will meet Federal standards for conserving energy "energy Star Program" and will use "NY State Energy Conservation and Construction Code" for construction of the residence PREPARED BY Tom Samuels Created on 5125105 11:20 AM TITLE ARCHITECT DATE JUNE 20, 2011 October 22, 2013 Southold Town Board of Trustees Town Hall Annex Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: RE -CONSTRUCTION OF THE FLAHERTY RESIDENCE 470 Inlet Way, Southold, NY 11971 SCTM# 1000-92-01-06 Dear Sir/Madam: OCT 2 2 2013 ,JUif(I�U,ii ;L7iii • �•• We, are requesting a WETLANDS PERMIT 'for the above reference project, for the reconstruction of the principal structure of an existing residence, and associated improvements. All drainage will be directed to subsurface systems. This project previously received a Trustees permit, #7640, since expired, for a renovations and additions project. It received all other permits, and is in construction. Since that time, it has been determined that a full demolition of the existing principal structure would better comply with current NYS Residential Code (depth of footings) and the requirements of FEMA (base,flood elevation). The new construction will'take place,entirely within the existing footprint, except as previously' approved by the Trustees, and will be largely "in kind". For your review we are submitting the following documents: 1. Application 2. Short Environmental Assessment Form 3. Application Affidavit 4. LWRP Consistency Assessment Form 5. (4) SITE PLAN, FLOOR PLANS and ELEVATIONS 6. Stamped current Survey 7. Letter of authorization from Owner 8. Check for $250.00 9. ZBA findings 10. Six (6) photographs of,existing site conditions 11. Transactional Disclosure Form 12. Storm water run-off assessment form Please place us on the agenda for the November 13, 2013 hearing, and call us with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Thomas C. Samuels, Architect enc. ARCHITECTS 25235 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 (631) 734-6405 FAX (631) 734-6407 X S m tl m E E "SIL o o O M m / U m N o October 22, 2013 Southold Town Board of Trustees Town Hall Annex Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: RE -CONSTRUCTION OF THE FLAHERTY RESIDENCE 470 Inlet Way, Southold, NY 11971 SCTM# 1000-92-01-06 Dear Sir/Madam: OCT 2 2 2013 ,JUif(I�U,ii ;L7iii • �•• We, are requesting a WETLANDS PERMIT 'for the above reference project, for the reconstruction of the principal structure of an existing residence, and associated improvements. All drainage will be directed to subsurface systems. This project previously received a Trustees permit, #7640, since expired, for a renovations and additions project. It received all other permits, and is in construction. Since that time, it has been determined that a full demolition of the existing principal structure would better comply with current NYS Residential Code (depth of footings) and the requirements of FEMA (base,flood elevation). The new construction will'take place,entirely within the existing footprint, except as previously' approved by the Trustees, and will be largely "in kind". For your review we are submitting the following documents: 1. Application 2. Short Environmental Assessment Form 3. Application Affidavit 4. LWRP Consistency Assessment Form 5. (4) SITE PLAN, FLOOR PLANS and ELEVATIONS 6. Stamped current Survey 7. Letter of authorization from Owner 8. Check for $250.00 9. ZBA findings 10. Six (6) photographs of,existing site conditions 11. Transactional Disclosure Form 12. Storm water run-off assessment form Please place us on the agenda for the November 13, 2013 hearing, and call us with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Thomas C. Samuels, Architect enc. ARCHITECTS 25235 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 (631) 734-6405 FAX (631) 734-6407 EXISTING G0\/ERA0E SITE AREA LANDWARD OF TIDAL WETLANDS: 4cf, 602 SF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE: 1,840 SF, 5.7 Y LOT COVERAGE EXI5TIN6 OUTDOOR ENTRY TERRACES: 157 5F, 0.36 % LOT COVERAGE EXISTING GAZEBO STRUCTURE: 80 5F, 0.16 % LOT COVERA6E EXISTING GARAGE STRUCTURE: 835 5F, 1.7 % LOT COVERAGE EXI5TIN6 POOL STRUCTURE: 647 5F, 1.3 % LOT COVERAGE EXISTING WALKWAYS ON GRADE: 807 SF, I.6 % LOT COVERAGE EXISTING DEGK5 ABOVE GRADE: 2,362 SF, 4.8 % LOT GOVERA6E TOTAL : 6,158 S1=, 15.6 % LOT COVERAGE FROFOSED GO\/ERA&& 51 TE AREA LANDWARD OF TIDAL WETLANDS: 41 f, 602 51= PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL 5TRUGTURE: 1,954 5F, 3.9 % LOT GOVERA6E PROPOSED OUTDOOR ENTRY TERRAGE5: III SF, 0.22 % LOT COVERAGE EXISTING GAZEBO STRUCTURE: 80 5F, 0.16 % LOT COVERAGE EXISTING GARAGE STRUCTURE: 835 SF, 1.7 % LOT COVERAGE EXISTING POOL STRUCTURE: 647 5F, 1.3 % LOT COVERAGE EXI5TIN6 WALKWAYS ON GRADE: 807 5F, 1.6 % LOT COVERAGE EXISTING DECKS ABOVE GRADE: 2362 SF, 4.7 % LOT COVERAGE FROPOSED TOTAL : 6 ,7�6 SF, 15.7 % LOT COVERAGE D CED PO RIS FAINT ST vj *,- 1 \OGF .off J IC,tiF All T -EST Huo"LE BY MARK McDONALD GEOSCIENCE NO SCALE SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 TEST HOLE DATA ( 5/20/031 WATER IN BROWN56 FT. 6 CLAYEY SAND SC WATER IN BROWN 62 FT.1 FINE TO MEDIUM SAND SP COMMENTS: WATER ENCOUNTERED 4' BELOW SURFACE, EDGE OF TIDAL WETLANDS AS DELINEATED BY SUFFOLK ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC. ON APRIL 26, 2011 SET �N vEl V EXISTING GRAVEL PARKING AREA F-EDOE OF TIDAL WETLANDS AS DELINEATED BY SUFFOLK ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, EXISTING INC. ON APRIL 26, 2011 UTILITY POLE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS FOR AREA OF NEW ROOF DW -A DRY WELL AREA x RAINFALL x RUNOFF FACTOR (DW) 2987 5F x (2/12 FT. x .0 = 496 CU. FT. US 6:2R7D R x 2' HIGH PO L (6) 6' RAIN RING = 507 CU. FT. PREQUIRED 5> 496 C.U. FT. DRAINAGE CATIONS FOR AREA OF NEW DRIVEWAY DW -B LL RAINFALL x RUNG F (D 6 42 5F x (2 2 T x 0.7 = 77FT USE: 00 8' DIAMETER x 2' HIGH PO (9) 8' X 2' STORM DRAIN RING = 76 PROVIDED REQUIR 760 GU. FT. > 740 CU LI TILE DRIVEWAY RAIN WATER RUNOFF PECONI C SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" N HIGH WATER MA T/f �.A,� RK 14j - ..j:1 ?EXISTING WOOD p j DECK RAISED TO X NEW FLOOR LEVE N- 4 PROPOSED HAY BALES 4 SILT FENCE DURING CONSTRUCTION MEAN EX 1 ST I N6 PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE TO BE DEMOL 1 SLED AND RECONSTRUCTED EDGE OF TIDAL WETLANDS AS DELINEATED BY SUFFOLK ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTIN6, INC. ON APRIL 261 2011 X y 75 FT 5ETBAGK LINE � to rn Cd N Uj 00 M Z S= 5 o0 16 �0. NN. U -TIE LINES ALONG MEAN HIGH WA TER MARK EXISTING CHILDRENS PYLA Y 3TR SITE DATA SCTM # 1000-92-01-08 PROPERTY: 470 Inlet Way ADDRESS Southold, NY 11971 OWNER: Eileen and Vincent J. Flaherty 10 West St., New York, NY 10004 SITE: 50,094 sf =1.15 acres ZONING: RESIDENTIAL 40 (R-40) SURVEYOR: PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C. P.O. BOX 909 1230 TRAVELER STREET SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 (631) 765-5020 FAX (631) 765-1797 LICENSE # 49618 DATED 11/22/2004 MAY 3, 2011 (TIDAL WETLANDS LOCATION) LOCAT101 I m M A IF �"` EXISTING BOCCI BALL COURT FL00A`E 6 ---� FLOOD ZONE X LINE OF ' FLOOD ZONE EXISTING TERRACE J G EXE aUv, P W ADDITION TO EXISTIN6 DECK TO CONNECT W/EXISTIN6 TERRACE � ARK r N N„ c� O -NEW DRYWELL5 FOR BOO Q ROOF RAINWATER ,d RUNOFF N �G EXI5TIN6 ROOF BETWEEN PRINCIPAL 4 ACCESSORY X y� STRUCTURES o�O NEW DRY WELL FOR POOL BACKWASH `-PROPOSED HAY BALES 4 SILT FENCE DURING CONSTRUCTION LINE OF 0 FLOOD ZONE P� 0 110,15 55"W 511.1 Z M 186,)1, P!�IJ 1 3 ? i3 SJSt1iG�J �Cr1ii _ Board of Trustees iumlla U :j REVISIONS 5/5o/12 PORCH ROOF 4//5/12 SITE DATA PROPOSED COVERED ENTRY Q8/15/15 1PRAINA6E 1%2/13 NEW LINE OF FLOOD ZONE TEST HOL CONSTRUCTION z 1%/13 EX. SANITARY PROP05ED HAY .'..... Z EXISTING BALES 4 SILT FENCE UTILITY POLE DURING CONSTRUCTION /° I J -15m -rpI _ . :fi M R4 O _ INNNNNNNN 0 U) ,Ili, �• Ili/ }I - a W ,11 i/ 00 .00 >. N6 — ,�h, ' - OVER HEAD ZQN O \ •9 WIR ES p0 O ,:pyo a ...... .....:.: ' 0'00 E 0 90.00 ADDITION Ti W J N88 EXISTING FOOTPRIN Z R - B -E - ac X Z - co M Ic" r F( ,�+ B Bx x INE OF Q � LPORCH LO Uj • N = A O ,� o � h o I ZONF X FLOOD ZONE ISTI NG' GN AV PLOOD ZONE B A x ROOF .N X`: o YE 8 �� : DRIVFWA,Y:`: - , _ NEW DRYWELL5 FO WOOD BULKHEAD 0 LI TILE DRIVEWAY RAIN WATER RUNOFF PECONI C SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" N HIGH WATER MA T/f �.A,� RK 14j - ..j:1 ?EXISTING WOOD p j DECK RAISED TO X NEW FLOOR LEVE N- 4 PROPOSED HAY BALES 4 SILT FENCE DURING CONSTRUCTION MEAN EX 1 ST I N6 PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE TO BE DEMOL 1 SLED AND RECONSTRUCTED EDGE OF TIDAL WETLANDS AS DELINEATED BY SUFFOLK ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTIN6, INC. ON APRIL 261 2011 X y 75 FT 5ETBAGK LINE � to rn Cd N Uj 00 M Z S= 5 o0 16 �0. NN. U -TIE LINES ALONG MEAN HIGH WA TER MARK EXISTING CHILDRENS PYLA Y 3TR SITE DATA SCTM # 1000-92-01-08 PROPERTY: 470 Inlet Way ADDRESS Southold, NY 11971 OWNER: Eileen and Vincent J. Flaherty 10 West St., New York, NY 10004 SITE: 50,094 sf =1.15 acres ZONING: RESIDENTIAL 40 (R-40) SURVEYOR: PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C. P.O. BOX 909 1230 TRAVELER STREET SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 (631) 765-5020 FAX (631) 765-1797 LICENSE # 49618 DATED 11/22/2004 MAY 3, 2011 (TIDAL WETLANDS LOCATION) LOCAT101 I m M A IF �"` EXISTING BOCCI BALL COURT FL00A`E 6 ---� FLOOD ZONE X LINE OF ' FLOOD ZONE EXISTING TERRACE J G EXE aUv, P W ADDITION TO EXISTIN6 DECK TO CONNECT W/EXISTIN6 TERRACE � ARK r N N„ c� O -NEW DRYWELL5 FOR BOO Q ROOF RAINWATER ,d RUNOFF N �G EXI5TIN6 ROOF BETWEEN PRINCIPAL 4 ACCESSORY X y� STRUCTURES o�O NEW DRY WELL FOR POOL BACKWASH `-PROPOSED HAY BALES 4 SILT FENCE DURING CONSTRUCTION LINE OF 0 FLOOD ZONE P� 0 110,15 55"W 511.1 Z M 186,)1, P!�IJ 1 3 ? i3 SJSt1iG�J �Cr1ii _ Board of Trustees iumlla U :j REVISIONS 5/5o/12 PORCH ROOF 4//5/12 SITE DATA 6/*/I2 PER Z13A Q8/15/15 1PRAINA6E 1%2/13 NEW CONSTRUCTION z 1%/13 EX. SANITARY Z J O Z H O _ INNNNNNNN 0 U) 0 a W Z a iN- 00 0 Z O F- a O Z W a W J Z 0 d' Z - co M Ic" r F( LLJ z taZLL �w•ULnLUo aC404 LO Uj • N = A O a I- • to cn CO NEW), PO�ry2,G'A.f PROJECT NO:" 1010 DRAWN BY: UT CHECKED BY: TS DATE: 7/29/13 SCALE: 1 IN= 20'-0" SHEET TITLE: SITE PLAN SHEET NO.: EX I ST I NCS GOBI ERA&E SITE AREA LANDWARD OF TIDAL WETLANDS: 4(f, 602 SF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE: 1,840 5F, 3.7 % LOT COVERAGE EXISTING OUTDOOR ENTRY TERRACES: 187 SF, 0.38 % LOT COVERAGE EXISTING GAZEBO STRUCTURE: 60 SF, 0.16 % LOT COVERAGE EXISTING GARAGE STRUCTURE: 835 SF, 1.7 % LOT COVERAGE EXISTING POOL STRUCTURE: 647 SF, 1.3 % LOT COVERAGE EXISTING WALKWAYS ON GRADE: 807 5F, I.6 % LOT COVERAGE EXISTING DECKS ABOVE GRADE: 2,362 SF, 4.8 % LOT COVERAGE TOTAL : 6,158 SF, 15.6 % L❑T COVERAGE PROPOSED CO Y ERA69E SITE AREA LANDVgARD of TIDAL WETLANDS: 4ci, 602 SF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE: 1,954 5F, 5A % LOT COVERAGE PROPOSED OUTDOOR ENTRY TERRACES: III SF, 0.22 % LOT COVERAGE EXISTING GAZEBO STRUCTURE: 80 SF, 0.I6 % LOT COVERAGE EXISTING GARAGE STRUCTURE: 835 5F, 1.7 % LOT COVERAGE EXISTING POOL STRUCTURE: 647 SF, 1.3 % LOT COVERAGE EXISTING WALKWAYS ON GRADE: 807 5F, 1.6 % LOT COVERAGE EXI5TIN6 DEGK5 ABOVE GRADE: 2362 5F, 4.7 % LOT COVERAGE PROPOSED TOTAL : 6,/116 SF, 15.7 % LOT COVERAGE CEDAR DRIVE POINT EAST BY MARK McDONALD GEOSCIENCE NO SCALE SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 TEST HOLE DATA ( 5/20/081 WATER IN BROWN 6 FT. CLAYEY SAND SC WATER IN BROWN 62 FT. FINE TO MEDIUM SAND SP COMMENTS: WATER ENCOUNTERED 4' BELOW SURFACE EDGE OF TIDAL WETLANDS AS DELINEATED BY SUFFOLK ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC. ON APRIL 261 2011 �N I�N EXISTING GRAVEL PARKING AREA FAIR DGE OF TIDAL WETLANDS AS ea DELINEATED BY SUFFOLK ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, EXISTING INC. ON APRIL 26, 2011 UTILITY POLE �j PROPOSED COVERED ENTRY OL �F�py LINE OF FLOOD ZONE TEST HOL � ► O F 61.1�\ F PROPOSED HAY �p0 s -�o �� \ �—EXISTING BALES SILT FENCE / I1TI1 IN Pnl F t'�IIQIf.I/� �.ntJc,Tt7ll�_rIn1J I DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS FOR AREA OF NEW ROOF DW -A DRY WELL AREA x RAINFALL x RUNOFF FACTOR (DW) 2x87 SF x (2/12 FT. x .O 4' GU. FT. U 6 ' DIAM TER x 2' HIGH PO L Q (6) 8'X 2' STORM DRAIN RING = 507 CU. FT. A PROVIDED REQUIRED 506 GU. FT. > 498 GU. FT. DRAINAGE CAL LATIONS FOR AREA OF NEW DRIVEWAY DW -B (DYV - 6342 SF x (2/12 1=Ta x -0:7 -= 740 CU. FT. USE: (9) 8' DIAMETER x 2' HIGH POOL () ' (9) 8'X 2' STORM DRAIN RING = 760 CU. FT. PROVIDED REQUIRED 760 GU. FT. > 740 GU. FT. S78-15,00,, 00 0 „E LINE OF - PORCH oFLOOD ZONE A ROOF N I o ZONE fiF. x ° : 2 1;> OVE DRIVFWAY :. I NEW DRYWELLS FO WOOD BULKHEAD o DRIVEWAY RAIN w WATER RUNOFF _ ° nry, LOCATION OF. EXISTING SANITARY MAN W SYSTEM 1V76.1218"W E HIGH A TER MARK 144.31- Ll 4431,Ll T TL E PECONI C BA Y N SCALE: V = 20'-0" ?EXISTING WOOD p � j DECK RAISED TO X NEW FLOOR LEVE Nle 4 PROPOSED HAY BALES 4 SILT FENCE DURING CONSTRUCTION EX 1 ST I N6 PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE TO BE DEMOL 1 SHED AND RECONSTRUCTED EDGE OF TIDAL WETLANDS AS DELINEATED BY SUFFOLK ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC. ON APRIL 261 2011 to rn C6 N W M z X r 75 FT SETBACK LINE � EXISTING TERRACE Z �X\So0 G P �XSRPGE SITE SCTM # 1000-92-01-08 PROPERTY: 470 Inlet Way ADDRESS Southold, NY 11971 OWNER: Eileen and Vincent J. Flaherty 10 West St., New York, NY 10004 SITE: 50,094 sf = 1.15 acres ZONING: RESIDENTIAL 40 (1140) SURVEYOR: PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C. P.O. BOX 909 1230 TRAVELER STREET SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 (631) 765-5020 FAX (631) 765-1797 LICENSE # 49618 DATED 11/22/2004 MAY 3, 2011 (TIDAL WETLANDS LOCATION) LOCATIOIN' MAR le'S c a � Main Rd N "o NN. u� u -TIE LINES ALONG MEAN HIGH WA TER MARK EXISTING CHILDRENS TRUAY CTUR ZEII S;)061. EXISTING BOCCI BALL COURT -� LOOD NE AE 6 —� N P -p4V ZONE X N� F LINE OF FLOOD ZONE LADDITION TO EXISTING DECK TO CONNECT Zh rv/EXI5TIN6 TERRACE MARK 11-416 zikl 186 71.0 M M ° "J Cedar O NEW DRYWELLS FOR �O 0� ROOF RAINWATER RUNOFF d �G EXISTING ROOF BETWEEN PRINCIPAL 4 ACCESSORY y� STRUCTURES o7 - NEIN DRY WELL FOR POOL BACKWASH ------PROPOSED HAY BALES 4 SILT o FENCE DURING CONSTRUCTION cp LINE OF N� o FLOOD ZONE 0v , �/ ° 110'5 55"W 5141 GCT 2 2 N *i jjj,i�ii Cedar Beach County Park REVISIONS Sino/12 PORCH ROOF 4/5/12 SITE DATA %/I2 PER ZBA QS/15/13 DRAINAGE 1%2/13 NEW CONSTRUCTION Z od J z 1– M O co co0 Q W Z Q C O z >= O > O LU >Q z W Uj J Z 0 Ca Z. vi cl-, LiN a0OW LV --I ' w z �aZ M LU - v ui W • N = M V Q I-- • v o N CO - �E OF NFw 0� SPS C. S, , YO.Q O 018350A G PROJECT NO: 1010 DRAWN BY: UT CHECKED BY: TS DATE: 7/29/13 SCALE: 1 " = 20'-0" SHEET TITLE: SITE PLAN SHEET NO.: WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" =1' -0" SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 118" = V-0" EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8"= V -0" NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 118" =1' -0" SECOND FLOOR PLAN FLOOD ZONE "AE6" FLOOD ZONE "X" SCALE: 118" - r -0" i i --------------------------------J FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 118" - V-0" EXISTIr+s WOOD DEGKINB REGULATORY APPROVALS Z n 0 L2L 1� fn D ,0,^ V/ TW cf)i F - 00L 1� V♦ Z 0 a n 0 Z LKLua v LLI a 0 W v od Z �Q• M Jam• c�� WJ•��3i� �u z a z a W• a x N N• PROJECT NO: 1010 DRAWN BY: TS CHECKED BY: DATE: 10/22/13 SCALE: 1/8" = 1 ' - 011 SHEET TITLE: PLANS AND ELEVATIONS SHEET NO: 4'-8y2" 52i4/2" 10'-1 oy2" ILI '-lOy21 21'-O" OCi - __—====TJ-,-------�---------------------- IiC+itii Board Tr jl n II III 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I/ IH —I— I— I— f- -I- dUP I II III i l l l l l I/ I I I I I I I I L — — — — _---- -I L1 J _I _I J J _I_I_ L L 1 I FOUNDATION FROP05ED TO --— --- — BE REPLACED S Ok NN II G v HATCHED (FREV1 UJL I NEW MASONRY PIERS TO SUPPORT L - SL - - - NEW PORCH ROOF. ASSESS INTENDED TO REMAIN) CONDITION OF EXISTING DECK I FRAMING AND REPLACE AS REQ'D. _ _ II 20 I I— m cv L_J L_J II I I o I I I Vi EXISTING GONG. FOUNDATION, I I EXISTING FILLED AREA EXISTING GONG. UNDER STONE PAVING FOOT I NC -7S 4 SLAB TO REMAIN � i I � I FOUNDATION WALLS TO REMAIN Li F c I I 0 0 I APPROX. LOCATION PROVIDE NE1410LOSED N n I- EXISTING GONG. PIERS VIA CELL SPRAJ Y oAM m TO REMAIN I - - - �NSI,fLATJQN -11��11 VOID SPACE - - - - - - - - - - - - sk BETWEEN EXIS INC FRAMING L— — — — — — — — — — — — EXISTING 2x8016" F.J. EXISTING 2 016" F.J. EXISTING 2x8®16" F.J. r- ry o — EXISTI G n cpAKLi SPACE RAKED SAND I u - B _ 7 m FLOW THRU FLOOD VENT" (SEE SPECS) /— L (3)2x10 -I- (5)2x ` �3}�x�9 _-------- ---- ---- I L IJI (------------------� II x 8"x16" GMU PIER ON I I- + m 24"x24"x8" REINF. GONG. I i I FOOTING ®56" BELOW GRADE �. I -• Ifl L J L J L J I VI TFouNmai"AION rLAIM CRANL SERGE i S = I SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" iOf - 2x1O ® I6" O.C.NEW FLOOR JOISTS m I CLOSED G SPRAY FOAM N INSULATION rR SPECS. I I r A HATCHING INDICATES AREA TO BE DEMOLISHED AND RE -BUILT (5)NyY LVL G t� _ (5)" LVL GONTIN._ W/NEWFOUNDATION AND FRAMINGABOVE I T- -- --- I _-�---------- ---- -_--- n LI L J LL:.J I ESTABLISH TOP OF FOUNDATION HEIGHT TO SET TOP OF NEW L _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ FLOOR FRAMING EQUAL TO TOP OF EXISTING FLOOR FRAMING. NEW JOISTS ARE DEEPER (2)<10) THAN EXI5TING (2)<8)n ''t"• "' �— — — — — — — -- I °' I I-------------� I I II m I I -AI F I .; I I I I I I 1) FILLED AREA W/CONC. SLAB I ";' ( I I L J L d STONE PAVING ABOVE •II I I` I II x xI I I I ' J.I I •' n I L-----------JI1 ►' L -------------I 't> L------- I I---- ------ _ -- I------------------� I () �f. .•iaf•i �f: i .✓•. "J 1. •i':�_-77-77-77-7777. 't- . . -.i. •• i: ..5,•...• •1 fy' 8" THK. GONG. FOUNDATION WALL FOUNDATION PERMITTED TO ON 16"x8" DEEP GONG. FOOTING REINF. 11/(5) #4 BARS BE REFLAOED- 10'-5y2" 811 Lk I imp NG RERMIOT REVISIONS 1012V15 NEW FOUNDATION Z O J O F" O co w 3:0F— O F— O >= F— Q o = v z w � Q W m a 0 W V OF NFjV g� 'ps C. Sq?1G'Q� 0183 PROJECT NO: 1006 DRAWN BY: TS CHECKED BY: DATE: 7/29/13 SCALE: 1/411 = 1' - 0" SHEET TITLE: FOUNDATION PLAN SHEET NO: