Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites in NYS Phase I Investigations - Southold Landfill
ENG|NEEP!NC |NVEST|GAT0NS AT iNACT|VE H4ZARO�US VVASTE �|TE� OFIASE | !NVEST|GAT|ON5 SOUTHOLDLANDF\LL TUVVN" OF C�TC�O�UE S]FF0LK [0UN[Y` N��V YORK NY�[}E� 51TE 52O -6Z NEW STATE OBPARTVENT0F�NV|RDN�ENTAL CO�ERVATiON |--I;emry C. Williams, Comrnissioner Division of 5o|'d ond |-ioznrdous VVosfe Non -non H' Noacnchyrk, P.E, Director Prepared by: VVDODYVA"\'D-CLYC,E [ONSULT4tNT�, |Nc' |Z�D Broadway, 115th Floor New York, New York 10001 ' [}ecen`bcr 1985 82C4548-3 4 ENGINEERING INVESTIGATIONS AT INACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE SITES IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK PHASE I INVESTIGATIONS SOUTHOLD LANDFILL TOWN OF CUTCHOGUE SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK NYSDEC SITE NO. 152062 Prepared for: Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12233 Prepared by: WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS, INC. 1250 Broadway, 15th Floor New York, New York 10001 December 1985 82C4548-3 � f TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1.0 NARRATIVE SUMMARY 1-1 2.0 U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DOCUMENTATION 2-1 2.1 Preliminary HRS Work Sheets 2-2 2.2 Documentation Records For HRS 2-10 2.3 EPA Form 2070-12 2-29 2.4 EPA Form 2070-13 2-34 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 3-1 4.0 SITE DATA 4-1 4.1 Site Area Surface Features 4-1 4.2 Site Hydrogeology 4-1 4.2.1 Ground -Water Occurrence 4-1 4.2.2 Ground -Water Quality 4-2 4.2.3 Ground -Water Use 4-2 4.3 Past Sampling and Analysis 4-3 5.0 DATA ADEQUACY 5-1 6.0 WORK PLAN 6-1 6.1 Objectives 6-1 6.2 Field Investigation Plan 6-1 6.2.1 Preliminary Site Investigations 6-1 6.2.2 Geophysical Studies 6-2 6.2.3 Monitoring Wells 6_2 6.2.3.1 Installation 6-2 6.2.3.2 Water Elevations 6-3 6.2.3.3 Aquifer Testing 6-4 6.2.4 Sampling and Analysis Plan i 6-4 6.2.4.1 General Plan 6-4 6.2.4.2 Sampling Parameters 6-4 6.2.4.3 Sampling Locations 6-4 6.3 Health and Safety Plan 6-5 6.4 Report Preparation 6-5 6.5 Cost Estimate 6-6 E201/227B i r LIST OF TABLES TABLE NUMBER TITLE I SOURCES OF INFORMATION 2 PROPOSED CHEMICAL ANALYSES 3 ESTIMATED COSTS FOR PHASE II INVESTIGATION LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE NUMBER TITLE I SITE LOCATION MAP 2 LOCATION PLAN FOR PROPOSED PHASE II INVESTIGATION E281/227B LIST OF TABLES TABLE NUMBER TITLE SOURCES OF INFORMATION 2 PROPOSED CHEMICAL ANALYSES 3 ESTIMATED COSTS FOR PHASE II INVESTIGATION LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE NUMBER TITLE I SITE LOCATION MAP 2 LOCATION PLAN FOR PROPOSED PHASE II INVESTIGATION E281 /227B i i r APPENDICES APPENDIX TITLE A REFERENCES B SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION C UPDATED NEW YORK STATE REGISTRY FORM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Southold Landfill is located in the town of Cutchogue, Suffolk County, New i York (Figure 1). The Southold Landfill is located in a predominately agricultural zone. The facility has been operating continuously at the North Road site since 1951. This facility accepts municipal and domestic wastes, demolition and landscaping debris, and cesspool and septic tank wastes. Of major concern is the ground water. Some ground -water deterioration has already been noted within this area. Additional data is needed to determine the current status of the ground water quality there and in its vicinity. The Phase I effort for the Southold Landfill included: collection and review of existing data; preparation of a preliminary Hazard Ranking Score (HRS) for the site; conducting a site investigation/responsible parties interview; development of a preliminary hydrogeologic model; completion of required documentation; development of a work plan and estimated costs for further investigations at the site, and preparation of a summary report. i The preliminary HRS scores developed for the Southhold Landfill (NYSDEC Site No. 152062) are as follows: SM = 37.99 (Sgw = 65.62 Ssw = 3.72 So = 0) SFE = N/A SDC = 12.50 The data available were somewhat adequate to prepare a final HRS score, although information concerning the quantity of the waste was unknown. Tile existence of - hazardous substances is verified by the presence of hazardous compounds within leachate emanating from the landfill. E281 /227B { r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Southold Landfill is located in the town of Cutchogue, Suffolk County, New i York (Figure 1). The Southold Landfill is located in a predominately agricultural zone. The facility has been operating continuously at the North Road site since 1951. This facility accepts municipal and domestic wastes, demolition and landscaping debris, and cesspool and septic tank wastes. Of major concern is the ground water. Some ground -water deterioration has already been noted within this area. Additional data is needed to determine the current status of the ground water quality there and in its vicinity. The Phase I effort for the Southold Landfill included: collection and review of existing data; preparation of a preliminary Hazard Ranking Score (HRS) for the site; conducting a site investigation/responsible parties interview; development of a preliminary hydrogeologic model; completion of required documentation; development of a work plan and estimated costs for further investigations at the site, and preparation of a summary report. i The preliminary HRS scores developed for the Southhold Landfill (NYSDEC Site No. 152062) are as follows: SM = 37.99 (Sgw = 65.62 Ssw = 3.72 So = 0) SFE = N/A SDC = 12.50 The data available were somewhat adequate to prepare a final HRS score, although information concerning the quantity of the waste was unknown. Tile existence of - hazardous substances is verified by the presence of hazardous compounds within leachate emanating from the landfill. E281 /227B •7 The Phase II Work Plan developed for the Southold Landfill is specifically designed to address questions concerning soil, ground water and air quality so that a final HRS score and conceptual remedial designs and estimated costs can be developed. We have proposed a limited geophysical survey, the installation of four monitoring wells, ground water, leachate, and soil sampling and air monitoring. A detailed description of the work plan and estimated costs is provided in Section 6.0. E281/227B Ii .ti Duck.Pond�" Poi nty�ep • / •�', vim~ .�`�\\a\\ . ° o -��"\ � i ,�OpO `� �a0. moo\ ����' '60 oma, / 4v SOUTHOLD LANDFILLSITE ! _f / o.' , a O\ o • /\� "t , ` // �q'Y \ /]/y Lam.- ~ /^� .' O� \ .. ,.. %� �2p`-. . 57 ,0 9'Ls `� .•��`/ .7 1 0 +CiU�CDOgII@Sta _\/ �,'_y �.• •EUG �I o4 •° \ /� \ /� / / 10 SacreO•Heart Cem o- \ SO` \ •moi �\'., •.Jr •� ,�2'.:'�,-� •Z4 .. 40 loo- / C ,` P� •o.9i� 1. • i Cutchogue •. _ • •, 27 eutch S .40 \ 1-.' p\ \ �,;;.•r ••�'V r %• 1• 1 �A�..�...:' ° BM 32. .-201'" dl COORDINATES MAP SOURCE: 0 Y000 4000 FT LAT. 410 01' 41" USGS MAPS MATTITUCK HILLS AND SOUTHOLD LONG. 720 30' 00" QUADRANGLES NEW YORK—SUFFOLK CO. SCALE 7.5 MINUTE SERIES 1956 ONME Prepareato, A"'owd SOUTHOLD LANDFILL SITE NEWVORKSTATE PHASE I INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CO :ERVATION SITE LOCATION MAP I So Wolf Rota. Albanv. "Iew Volk 1 233 Prepared by .. ' ` ' Renry G wimemt• L;ommm,one' WOODWARD—CLYDE CONSULTANTS, INC. %> D CONSULTING ENGINEERS. GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS O D—pon of Soba and Harardoo• Wale NEW YORK, NEW YORK �o =PROJ NO. 82C4548-3 or Nman H Nowncru k. P.E DR. BY: BT D SCALE: AS SHOWN OF,, VOR,K �S-�'t Duactor CK'D. BY: DM DATE 23 JAN 1985 FIG NO. 1 1.0 NARRATIVE SUMMARY The Southold Landfill has been operating continuously since 1951 at North Road in Cutchogue, New York. The site is located in the northeast part of Long Island, in Suffolk County, and is about 50 feet above mean sea level (USGS, 1956). The entire site covers an area of 41 acres, however, the active landfill area is only 20 acres. The site is situated in a predominantly agricultural zone. The Southold Landfill is owned and operated by the Town of Southold. This facility accepts municipal and domestic wastes, demolition and landscaping debris, and cesspool and septic tank wastes. The Cutchogue Harbor and the Long Island Sound are within 3 miles of the site. No wetlands or critical wildlife habitats are located within this radius. The potential exists for ground -water contamination, the sole source of drinking water in this area, by a suspected leachate plume emanating from the landfill and/or by agricultural practices in the area. Some ground -water deterioration has already been noted within this area (SCDHS, 1982; ERCO, 1981). Over 10,000 people within a 3 -mile radius of the site rely on ground water as a source of drinking water. The Order on Consent dated May 16, 1979, outlined landfill operation violations of part 360 of 6 NYCRR. On August 31, 1981, the landfill was classified as an open dump. E281.1 /227B 2:0 U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DOCUMENTATION This section includes documentation records and work sheets required to develop Hazard Ranking System (HRS) scores. In addition, two EPA forms regarding site inspection and preliminary assessment have been completed and'are included as required. Documents included in this section are: I. Preliminary Hazard Ranking System (HRS) Work Sheets 2. Documentation Records for HRS 3. EPA Form 2070-12 (Preliminary Assessment) 4. EPA Form 2070-13 (Site Inspection Report) Forms were prepared as completely as possible using information available from private, county, state and federal agency sources. Values assigned to HRS rating factors are designated with a circle or a square reflecting complete or incomplete data, respectively. The Suffolk County Department of Health Services files and the Woodward -Clyde Consultants, Inc. Site Survey provided the most complete site specific data. Information provided in the Documentation Records for HRS are referenced and copies of most references are included in Appendix B. Agencies contacted for information on the site are listed in Table I. E281.2/22713 2-1 1 r 2:0 U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DOCUMENTATION This section includes documentation records and work sheets required to develop Hazard Ranking System (HRS) scores. In addition, two EPA forms regarding site inspection and preliminary assessment have been completed and'are included as required. Documents included in this section are: I. Preliminary Hazard Ranking System (HRS) Work Sheets 2. Documentation Records for HRS 3. EPA Form 2070-12 (Preliminary Assessment) 4. EPA Form 2070-13 (Site Inspection Report) Forms were prepared as completely as possible using information available from private, county, state and federal agency sources. Values assigned to HRS rating factors are designated with a circle or a square reflecting complete or incomplete data, respectively. The Suffolk County Department of Health Services files and the Woodward -Clyde Consultants, Inc. Site Survey provided the most complete site specific data. Information provided in the Documentation Records for HRS are referenced and copies of most references are included in Appendix B. Agencies contacted for information on the site are listed in Table I. E281.2/22713 2-1 01. m Duck .Pond' 60 ,. ' •, —' `� Oo/ \ .per \ i �, +Q.�o. • 37 /pSOLlgd\ \ �� o ' o °�'p•� SOUTHOLD LANDFILL �,` 47 ��illLCIIOgUQ Sta /301^.\/,. "�'-y1= G )10 \ 'O • ,•\ .. Cem 40 �� . •0.9�. "`` c` t' � . J .�••. moo, 27 Outchogt�e•�,' o16 ' ---moi ,40 \ X� .�f "\ �� �' - ! S� 8M 32 • o • _ \ _ --20 t1_ •;� chogue °s o/ \' \moo (�••n/. ^\\ r \ 1 �'.<� �, •' I i —� '? ° COORDINATES MAP SOURCE: 0 2000 4000 FT LAT. 410 01' 41" USGS MAPS MATTI TUCK HILLS AND SOUTHOLD SCALE LONG. 720 30' 00" QUADRANGLES NEW YORK—SUFFOLK CO. 7.5 MINUTE SERIES 1956 JtpONME,t,T Ptepa,edf°, AYVro»d SOUTHOLD LANDFILL SITE EN .';' 4 NEW YORK STATE PHASE I INVESTIGATION Q� >:;Ly'y`'?. HOZ DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION S0 Wolf Road. Albany, Ne.. York 12233 SITE LOCATION MAP 11enr P,et»red by: < vG Wdgamt,Commn�oner WOODWARD—CLYDE CONSULTANTS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS. GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS D—s-on of Sold and Harardouk Waste NEW YORK. NEW YORK Norman H. Nokencbuck, P.E DR BY: BTD SCALE: AS SHOWN PROD. NO 82C4548-3 Fw YORK Str D,rector CK'D. Ii Y: DM DATE: 23 JAN 1985 FIG NO.: 1 HRS DOCUMENTA*rION HRS WORKSHEETS RECORDS ~ 2.1 Preliminary Hazard Ranking System (HRS) Work Sheets E28 1.2/227B 2-2 - r - Fac ty ra ne: _Southold Landfill WWI= - C rntrhn(;np EPA PAKOon: I I Person(s)Inawieoftf-ofadllty:' James R. Douglas, Sanitation Supervisor of Landfill N,,, of Revbwer Michael A!�.erLiergsDom: April 5, 1985 Gerwal description of the faclhty: (For exampb: larxnl. surface wnpoundmsnt, pile, container; types of hazardous substances; location of the f cWtY; oonUffw%abOn route of major concorn; types of Information needed for rating; o0oncy action. etc.) The Southold Landfill has been operating continuously since 1951 at North Rd. in Cutchogue, New York. This facility accepts municipal and domestic wastes, demolition and landscaping debris, and cesspool and septic tank wastes. Of major concern is h ground water. Some ground water deterioration has already been noted within this area Additional data is need ed to dfntprminp the current status of the ground water quality there and in its vicinity. 37.99 65.62 3.72 Scores: SM (S9W saw Sa = 0 ) SF N/A SDC s 12. 50 FIGURE 1 HRS COVER SHEET 2-3 FIGURE 2 GROUND WATER ROUTE WORK SHEET a -q Ground Water Route Work Sheet Rating Factor Assigned Value Multi- Score Max. Ref. (Circle.One) plier Score (Section) ❑1 Observed Release 0 45 1 / 45 3.1 If observed release is given a score of 45, proceed to line ©. If observed release is given a score of 0, proceed to line �2 . ❑2 Route Characteristics 3.2 Depth to Aquifer of 0 1 2 3 2 8 Concern Net Precipitation 0 1 2 3 1 Permeability of the 0 1 2 3 1 3 Unsaturated Zone Physical State 0 1 2 3 1 3 Total Route Characteristics Score 15 Containment 0 1 2 3 1 3 3.3 ® Waste Characteristics 3.4 Toxicity/ Persistence 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 1 18 ' Hazardous Waste 0 rj] ' 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 8 Quantity Total Waste Characteristics Score /P 26 © Targets 3.5 Ground Water Use 0 1 2 Q3 3 % 9 Distance to 'Nearest j 0 4 6 8 10 1 r 40 Well/Population1} 12 16 18 �.- �J Served 24 30 32 35 40 Total Targets Score /1 ' ' 49 ® If line ❑1 is 45, multiply1❑ x x �5 If line ❑1 is 0, multiply ❑2 x x Qa x 57,330 0 Divide line © by 57,330 and multiply by 100 S gw - FIGURE 2 GROUND WATER ROUTE WORK SHEET a -q FIGURE 7 SURFACE WATER ROUTE WORK SHEET P, - .S M 0 O d) Surface Water Route Work Sheet Rating Factor Assigned Value (Circle One) Multi- plier Score Max. Score Ref. (Section) ED Observed Release @ 45 1 Q 45 4.1 If observed release is given a value of 45, proceed to line Q. If observed release is given a value of 0, proceed to line ❑2 . 0 Route Characteristics 4.2 Facility Slope and Intervening 1 . 2. 3 1 3 Terrain 1 -yr. 24 -hr. Rainfall 0 1 (? 3 1 3 Distance to Nearest Surface 0 0 2 3 2 2 6 Water Physical State 0 1 2 Q3 1 3 3 Total Route Characteristics Score 7 15 0 Containment 0 1 2© 1 3 3 4.3 ® Waste Characteristics 4.4 Toxicity/ Persistence 0 3 6 9 12 15 Hazardous Waste 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 8 Quantity Total Waste Characteristics Score 26 0 Targets 6 4.5 Surface Water Use 0 1 © 3 3 Q 9 Distance to a Sensitive 1 2 3 2 6 Environment Population Served/Distance, t0� 4 6 8 10 1 40 to Water Intake 1( 16 18 20 J} Downstream 24 30 32 35 40 Total Targets Score 6 55 ® If line 1] is 45, multiply 1❑ x 2 x >` %/ If line © is 0, multiply ❑2 x ❑3 x ® x �5 64,350 0 Divide line © by 64,350 and multiply by 100 SSW FIGURE 7 SURFACE WATER ROUTE WORK SHEET P, - .S M 0 O d) FIGURE 9 AIR ROUTE WORK SHEET 1. t FIGURE 10 WORKSHEET FOR COMPUTING Sm S S2 Groundwater Route Score (Sgw) -z% 30 0O Surface Water Route Score (Sqw) y Air Route Score (Sa) 2 2 2 Sgw +Sgw + Sa ? 1, T r�. Sgw + Ssw + Sa = SM - SQw + S2W + Sa / :2/ , 17 `7 1.73 FIGURE 10 WORKSHEET FOR COMPUTING Sm FIGURE 11 FIRE AND EXPLOSION WORK SHEET Fire and Explosion, ork Sheet Rating Factor Assigned Value Multi- Score Max. Ref. (Circle One) plier Score (Section) 0 Containment 1 3 1 3 7.1 0 Waste Characteristics 7,2 Direct Evidence 0 3 1 3 Ignitability 0 1 2 3 1 3 Reactivity 0 1 2 3 1 3 Incompatibility 0 1 2 3 1 1 Hazardous Waste — 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 3 Quantity Total Waste Characteristics Score 20 © Targets 7,3 Distance to Nearest 0 1 2 3 4 5 1 5 Population Distance to Nearest 0 1 2 3 1 3 Building Distance to Sensitive 0 1 2 3 1 3 Environment Land Use 0 1 2 3 1 3 Population Within 0 1 2 3 4 5 1 5 2-Mile Radius Buildings Within 0 1 2 3 4 5 1 5 2-Mile Radius Total Targets Score 24 ❑4 Multiply 1❑ x O x 1,440 0 Divide line Q4 by 1,440 and multiply by 100 SFE FIGURE 11 FIRE AND EXPLOSION WORK SHEET FIGURE 12 DIRECT CONTACT 'WORK SHEET w Direct Contact Work Sheet Rating Factor Assigned Value Multi- Score Max. Ref. (Circle One) plier Score (Section) Observed. Incident 0) 45 1 O 45 8.1 If line D is 45, proceed to line �4 If line Ot is 0, proceed to line Accessibility 0 (j) 2 3 1 3 8.2 �© 1J Containment 0 n5 1 - /.5 15 8.3 Waste Characteristics U Toxicity 0 1 203 5 /6- 15 8.4 ® Targets 8.5 Population Within a 0 1 2 Q 4 5 4 12-- 20 1 -Mlle Radius Distance to a ® 1 2 3 4 12 Critical Habitat i Total Targets Score 12 32 ® If line D is 45, multiply10 x4❑ x �5 If line 1Q is 0, multiply Q2 x 03 x x © 21,600 ©' Divide line © by 21,600 and multiply by 100 SDC a FIGURE 12 DIRECT CONTACT 'WORK SHEET w HRS DOCUMENTATION RECORDS 9 2.2 Documentation Records for HRS E281.2/227B 2-10 R DOCUMENTATION RECORDS a FOR HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM INSTRUCTIONS: The purpose of these records is to provide a convenient way to prepare an auditable record of the data and documentation used to apply the r Hazard Ranking System to a given facility. As briefly as possible summarize the information you used to assign the score for each factor (e.g., "Waste quantity 4,230 drums plus 800 cubic yards of sludges"). The source of information should be provided for each entry and should be a bibliographic -type reference that will make the document used for a given data point easier to find. Include the location of the document and consider appending a copy of the relevant page(s) for ease in review. FACILITY NAME: Southold Landfill LOCATION: North Road, Cutchoque, New York DATE SCORED: April 5, 1985 PERSON SCORING: Michael Akerbergs PRIMARY SOURCE(S) OF INFORMATION (e.g., EPA region, state, FIT, etc.): Woodward -Clyde Consultants, Inc. (WCCI) Site Interview and Inspection, 12/18/84 Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services (SCDHS) FACTORS NOT SCORED DUE TO INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION: See Section 5.0 - Data Adequacy COMMENTS OR QUALIFICATIONS: E281/227B 2 -II GROUND WATER ROUTE I. OBSERVED RELEASE Contaminants detected (S maximum): PCB 1260 1 ran Manganese Copper Zinc (Energy Resources Company, Inc. (ERCO), 1981). Rationale for attributir:g the contaminants to the iocili'ry: On site well tested in 1981 (ERCO, 1981). 2. ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS Depth to Aquifer of Concern Name/description of aquifer(s) of concern: Upper Glacial aquifer - undifferentiated fill deposits (Jensen, H.M. and Soren, Jr.' 1974). (Figures are located in Appendix B). The Upper Glacial aquifer and the underlying Magothy aquifer are hydraulically connected (See Jensen and Soren figures located in Appendix B). Depth(s) from the ground surface to the highest seasonal level of the saturated zone (water table(s)) of the aquifer of concern: 42-50 ft. (NYSDEC Region I well permits, 1984a). Depth from the ground surface to the lowest point of waste disposal/storage: 20 ft. Depth of landfill (WCCI site inspection, 1984). Net Precipitation Mean annual or seasonal precipitation (list months for seasonal): 46 inches (User's Manual) E281122713 2-12 b Mean annual lake or seasonal evaporation (list months for seasonal): 29 inches (User's Manual) Net precipitation (subtract the above figures): 17 inches Permeability of Unsaturated Zone Soil type in unsaturated zone: Stratified fine to coarse sand and gravel (Jensen & Soren, 1974). Permeability associated with soil type: Greater than 10-3 cm/sec (User's Manual). Physical State Physical state of substances at time of disposal (or at present time for generated gases): Solid (1) Sludge (3) (WCCI site inspection, 1984). 3. CONTAINMENT Method(s) of waste or leachate containment evaluated: Unlined lagoons Unlined landfill (WCCI site inspection, 1984; Users Manual). Method with highest score: Unlined landfill (3) (User's Manual) E281/227B 2-13 r 4. WASTE CHARACTERISTICS and Persistence IToxicity Compound(s) evaluated: PCB 1260 (18) Iron (18) Copper (18) Manganese (18) Zinc (18) Each compound is rated (3) for toxicity and (3) for persistence. (ERCO, 198 1) Compound with highest score: All compounds have the some score (ERCO, 1981). Hazardous Waste Quantity Total quantity of hazardous substances at the facility, excluding those with a containment score of 0 (Give a reasonable estimate even if quantity is above maximum): Unknown. Scored as I based on existence of hazardous substances of unknown quantity. Basis of estimating and/or computing .waste quantity: N/A 5. TARGETS Ground Water Use Use(s) of aquifer(s) of concern within a 3 -mile radius of the facility: Domestic drinking water supply, and agricultural use (WCCI site inspection, 1984); NYS Department of Agriculture and Markets, 1984). Distance to Nearest Well Location of nearest well drawing from aquifer of concern or occupied building not served by a public water supply: Domestic well south of site (NYSDEC Region I Well Permits). 3 wells on site presumably not for potable use (WCCI site inspection, 1984). Ground -water pumpage in area is mainly from the Upper Glacial aquifer (Jensen and Soren, 1974; see Appendix B). E281 /227B 2-14 Distance to above well or building: Domestic well - 1+00 ft. (NYSDEC Region I Well Permits; see Appendix B). On site wells presumably not for potable use. (WCCI site inspection, 1984) Population Served by Ground Water Wells Within a 3 -Mile Radius : Identified water -supply well(s) drawing from aquifer(s) of concern within a 3 - mile radius and populations served by each: Municipal water supply wells are located immediately outside of the 3 -mile radius (NYS Atlas of kN,iter System Sources, 1982). Although the wells are located outside t1he 3-mile°-,•adius, parts of the community s--rved are located within the 3 -mile radius. Drinking water within the 3 -mile radius is supplied by the Captain Kidd Water Company, the Greenport Water District or private supply wells. (NYS Atlas of Water Systern Sources, 1982; NYSDEC Region I Well Permits). Estimated population within a 3 -mile' radius supplied by ground water is 4,952 people (Donnelly Marketing, 1984). Computation of land area irrigated by supply well(s) drawing from aquifer(s) of concern within a 3 -mile radius, and conversion to population 0.5 people per acre): Approximately 979 acres x 1.5 - 1,469 people estimated from USGS (topographic quad sheets: Southold, Mattituck and Mattituck Hills). Total population served by ground water within a 3 -mile radius: Approximately 6,400 people. E281/227B 2-15 SURFACE WATER ROUTE I. OBSERVED RELEASE Contaminants detected in surface water at the facility or downhill from it (5 maximum): None Rationale for attributing the contaminants to the facility: N/A 2. ROUTE Cr�r„hC"]'Lf;]$TICS Facility Slope and Intervening Terrain Average slope of facility in percent: 3% (WCCI site inspection, 1984). Name/description of nearest downslope surface water: Long Island Sound (USGS, Mattituck Hills Quad, 1956). Average slope of terrain between facility and above-cited surface water body in percent: 3% (WCCI site inspection, 1984; USGS, 1956). Is the facility located either totally or partially in surface water? No (WCCI site inspection, 1984; USGS, 1956). Is the facility completely surrounded by areas of higher elevation? No (WCCI site inspection, 1984; USGS, 1956). I -Year 24 -Hour Rainfall in Inches 2.7 inches (User's Manual) E281 /2278 2-16 I Wa Distance to Nearest Downslope Surface Water 6,.000 feet (WCCI site inspection, 1984, USGS Southold (quad, 1956). Physical State of Waste See ground water route. 3. CONTAINMENT Containment Method(s) of waste or leachate containment evaluated: Landfill (WCC site inspection, 1984). Method with highest score: Landfill (3) (User's Manual). 4. WASTE CHARACTERISTICS Toxicity and Persistence Compound(s) evaluated See ground water route. i Compound with highest score: See ground water route. Hazardous Waste Quantity Total quantity of hazardous substances at the facility, excluding those with a containment score of 0 (Give a reasonable estimate even if quantity is above maximum): See ground water route. E281/227B 2-17 F 9 [iasis of estimating and/or computing waste quantity: See ground water route. 5. TARGETS Surface Water Use Use(s) of surface water within 3 miles downstream of the hazardous substance: Fishing, recr_;-otion (WCCI, site inspection, 1984). Is there tidal influence? No (USGS, 1956). Distance to a Sensitive Environment Distance to 5 -acre (minimum) coastal wetland, if 2 miles or less: None (NYSDEC Region 1, 1985). Distance to 5-ocre (minimum) fresh -water wetland, if I mile or less: None (NYSDEC Region 1, 1985). Distance to critical habitat of an endangered species or national wildlife refuge, if I mile or less: None (NYSDEC Division of Fish and Wildlife, 1984b). Population Served by Surface Water Location(s) of water -supply intake(s) within 3 miles (free-flowing bodies) or I mile (static water bodies) ,downstream of the hazardous substance and population served by each intake: N/A (NYS Atlas of Community Water System Sources, 1982). Computation of land area irrigated by above-cited intake(s) and conversion to population 0.5 people per acre): N/A E281/227B WHO Total population served: N/A Name/description of nearest of above water bodies: N/A Distance to above-cited intakes, measured in stream miles: N/A E281/227B 2-19 r AIR ROUTE I. OBSERVED RELEASE Contaminants detected: None Date and location of detection of contaminants: N/A Methods used to detect the contaminants: N/A Rationale for attributing the contaminants to the site: N/A 2. WASTE CHARACTERISTICS Reactivity and Incompatibility Most reactive compound: N/A Most incompatible pair of compounds: N/A Toxicity Most toxic compound: See ground water route. E281/227B 2-20 t Hazardous Waste Quantity Total quantity of hazardous waste: See ground water route. Basis of estimating and/or computing waste quantity: See ground water route. 3. TARGETS Population Within 4 -Mile Radius Circle radius used, give population, and indicate how determined: 0 to 4 mi 0 to I mi 0 to 1/2 mi 0 to 1/4 mi _ 8792 1143 (Donnelley Marketing and USGS Mattituck Hills Quad, 1954). Distance to a Sensitive Environment Distance to 5 -acre (minimum) coastal wetland, if 2 miles or less: None (NYSDEC Region I, 1985). Distance to 5 -acre (minimum) fresh=water wetland, if I mile or less: None (NYSDEC Region I, 1985). Distance to critical habitat of an endangered species, if I mile or less: None (NYSDEC Division of Fish and Wildlife,. 1984b). Land Use Distance to commercial/industrial area, if I mile or less: N/A L. E281/227B 2-21 Distance to national or state park, forest, or wildlife reserve, if 2 miles or less: N/A Distance to residential area, if 2. miles or less: 300 ft (WCCI site inspection, 1984). Distance to agricultural land in production within past 5 years, if I mile or less: 200 ft. (WCCI site inspection, 1984; NYS Department of Agriculture and Markets, 1984). Distance to prime agricultural land in production within past 5 years, if 2 miles or less: - 200 ft. (WCCI site inspection,. 1984; NYS Department of Agriculture and Markets, 1984). Is a historic or'landmark site (National Register of Historical Places and National Natural Landmarks) within the view of the site? The Old House (NHL 10/15/66). Fort C orchaug Site (NHL 1/18/74). (NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic 'Preservation, 1984). E281 /2278 2-22 r Distance to national or state park, forest, or wildlife reserve, if 2 miles or less: N/A Distance to residential area, if 2. miles or less: 300 ft (WCCI site inspection, 1984). Distance to agricultural land in production within past 5 years, if I mile or less: 200 ft. (WCCI site inspection, 1984; NYS Department of Agriculture and Markets, 1984). Distance to prime agricultural land in production within past 5 years, if 2 miles or less: - 200 ft. (WCCI site inspection,. 1984; NYS Department of Agriculture and Markets, 1984). Is a historic or'landmark site (National Register of Historical Places and National Natural Landmarks) within the view of the site? The Old House (NHL 10/15/66). Fort C orchaug Site (NHL 1/18/74). (NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic 'Preservation, 1984). E281 /2278 2-22 i ' I FIRE AND EXPLOSION 1. CONTAINMENT Hazardous substances present: iMethane1980). (1NCC1 site inspection, 1984; NYSDEC site inspection, Aug. Type of containment, if applicable: N/A 2. WASTE CHARACTERISTICS Direct Evidence Type of instrument and measurements: OVA 2-30 pprn (WCCI site inspection, 1984). Ignites Y Compound used: Methane (3) (User's Manual) Reactivity Most reactive compound: N/A Incompatibility Most incompatible pair of compounds: N/A E281/227B 2-23 r Hazardous Waste Quantity Total quantity of hazardous substances at the facility: See ground water route. Basis of estimating and/or computing waste quantity: See ground water route. 3. TARGETS Distance to Nearest Population 300 ft. (WCCI site inspection, 1984). Distance to Nearest Building 300 ft. (WCCI site inspection, 1984). Distance to Sensitive Environment Distance to wetlands: None (NYSDEC Region I, 1985). Distance to critical habitat: None (NYSDEC Division of Fish and Wildlife, 1'984b). .Distance to commerical/industrial area, if I mile or less: N/A Distance to national or state park, forest, or wildlife reserve, if 2 miles or less: None (USGS, 1979). E281/227B 2-24 4 Distance to residential area, if 2 miles or less: 300 ft. (WCCI site inspection, 1984). Distance to agricultural land in production within past 5 years, if I mile or less: See air route. Distance to prime agricultural land in production within past 5 years, if 2 miles or less: See air route. Is a historic or landmark site (National Register or Historic Places and National Natural Landmarks) within -few of the site? See air route. Population Within 2 -Mile Radius 2175 (Donnelley Marketing, 1984). Buildings Within 2- Mile Radius 851 (Donnelley Marketing, 1984). E281 /227B 2-25 DIRECT CONTACT I. OBSERVED INCIDENT Date, location, and pertinent details of incident: N/A 2. ACCESSIBILITY Describe type of barrier(s): Security guard (10 hrs/day) Fence Controlled entry Signs posted (WCCI site inspection, 1984). 3. CONTAINMENT Type of containment, if applicable: Lagoons (1 S) 4. WASTE CHARACTERISTICS Toxicity Compounds evaluated: See ground water route. E281/22713 2-26 Compound with highest score: See ground water route. E281/227B 2_27 r 5. TARGETS lation within one -mile radius 1143 (Donnelley Marketing, 1984). Distance to critical habitat (of endangered species) None (NYSDEC Region I, 1984b). E281/227B 2-28 r r c c EPA 2070 - 12 LVA 'LU/U - IIJ 10 2'3 EPA Form 2070-12 (Preliminary Assessment) 2-29 S,, p POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION ®PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT O1 STATE 02S ENUMB R ®OEP PART 1 -SITE INFORMATION AND ASSESSMENT A/y' " �t a��Q II. SITE NAME AND LOCATION 01 SITE NAME (LpAI, eernrtorl, a dHertpn.. arrN o/ &") sou 1 d �. d 02 STREET. ROUTE NO.. OR SPECIFIC LOCATION IDENTIFIER No,eA �Qd l ; 03 CITY CU,tCAo u.o— 04 STATE N 05 ZIP CODE l/ 93s OB COUNTY /� s� 07CODE 08 ONG IST 09 COORDINATES LA DE LONGITUDE 10 DIRECTIONS TO SITE (Stamp f o r st puck rwa) 25 - ear t -Aa Dgof 4a..,v 01 Ne, /11. /qjjl(t OA / N&;117 /Po4j, .Oi It III. RESPONSIBLE PARTIES 01 OWNER tnww.n) i mow,; souh�1� - i 02 STREET (6van.u. m.rvp, na.WmaAry Rid 03 CITY �t-M ,1 /K/i N O 1 �/ STATE73 05 ZIP CODE 06 TELEPHONE NUMBER 51-x 07 OPERATOR (Nkm—Arltldfrowt f o o—o,) 08 STREET (B-sn . mrrrq. Mwntaq OB CITY 10 STATE I N Y 11 ZIP CODE // 935 ELEPHONE NUMBER P16)71657-- 13 TYPE OF OWNERSHIP (ch cA oml ❑ A. PRIVATE ❑ B. FEDERAL: ❑ C. STATE ❑D.COUNTY XE. MUNICIPAL fAOAncY^„Nl ❑ F. OTHER: ❑ G. UNKNOWN (Spwcfy/ 14 OWNER/OPERATOR NOTIFICATION ON FILE fCA�cAOItMt Apyyl ❑ A. RCRA 3001 DATE RECEIVED: MONTH DAV YEAR I ) ❑ B. UNCONTROLLED WASTE SITE(CERCLA to3 c) DATE RECEIVED: ) ) ❑ C. NONE MONTH DAY YEAR IV. CHARACTERIZATION OF POTENTIAL HAZARD 01 ON SITE INSPECTION O p//T IDBY(cr.krtnaappy) YES DATE /2 )/o t o A. EPA ❑ B. EPA CONTRACTOR ❑ C. STATE � D. OTHER CONTRACTOR ❑ NO MONTH DAY YEAR ❑ E. LOCAI`HEALTH OFFICIAL ' ❑ F. OTHER: ! 1d W dw ow- CONTRACTOR NAME(S): 02 SITE STATUS (Ch-* Doral �03 01A. ACTIVE ❑ B. IN ❑ C. UNKNOWN YEARS OF OPERATION ,,OK X95/ I p,E p+"^'1 ❑ UNKNOWN BE(itMxNG YEAR ENDING YEAR 04 DfSCRfPTION OF SUBSTANCES POSSIBLY PRESENT. KNOWN, OR ALLEGED /n� // �fzCc c� a lie, ro "1j, C-1 f�s� �D� ,4s doh�ewk- a� ,d Ai A"o) � La�o�i � .r /.-oi/�ndi e�( e�, 5e OS DESCRIPTION OF PO ENTIAL HAZARD TO ENVIRONMENT AN /OR POPULATION . 14elk4C'IW& IL �j ' �O�o �f7ti1 Cp ot/11%�.c7� t -Ki f/YYr s�fG u /Jcc�P Gni /G� V! c!n/ V. PRIORITY ASSESS NT 01 PRIORITY FOR INSPECTION (cmc* om. I Aqn a nwdkm r chkdd, corMOMO P&I 2 - W"to tNornrfbn mw PWI 3 • Dwup( n of NAragNa caft to aw Itadaus) ❑ A. HIGH XB. MEDIUM,❑ C. LOW ❑ D. NONE (�ar.dpton pecbm root~ mmpocfan nowm (Yupr f on wa n ftob b"b) (No t VW Actbn woftdcomptoft f:unrn depomPon bon) VI. INFORMATION AVAILABLE FROM 01 CONTACT V/ 1. 11 i a m Rod 02 OF (Apt VlOrprtbonmt) i h col,� f e�.Q, 03 TELEPHONE NUMBER 1X61 moi- X21 04 PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSESSMENT 05 AGEACY 08 07 TELEPHONE NUMBER IIS -1)7-11 08 DATE 107— MONTH DAY YEAR CO/CQI< <. VOI – Q EPA FORM 2070.12(7-81) a -30 POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE 1. IDENTIFICATION PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT, 01 STATE oz srr Int EAl } PART 2 -WASTE INFORMATION I I it WASTE STATES, QUANTITIES, AND CHARACTERISTICS q I pHYSICAL STATES rCn•ce or rrw door) 02 WASTE QUANTITY AT SITE 03 WASTE CHARACTERISTICS fChoce r that eooryl 4 PESTICIDES fmims res Of real• woomme miser 0••Weoe� •n I �},a(�A. TOXIC . SOLUBLE G I. HIGHLY VOLATILE A SOLID C E SLURRY 'L B. CORROSIVE G F. INFECTIOUS C J. EXPLOSIVE f e POWDER. FINES W LIQUID TONS L C. RADIOACTIVE C G. FLAMMABLE C K REACTIVE _ 1 �C. SLUDGE 1= �' GAS BASES 'D. PERSISTENT L H. IGNITABLE G L. INCOMPATIBLE S HEAVY METALS CUBIC YARDS G M NOT APPLICABLE L D OTHER i fsp•chl NO.OF DRUMS 03 CAS NUMBER AGE.DISPOSAL METHOD 05 CONCENTRATION o" DD a lit. WASTE TYPE rCATEGORY SUBSTANCE NAME 01 GROSS AMOUNT 02 UNIT OF MEASURE 03 COMMENTS I sl_U SLUDGE do Gam,^ � WDLo (OLW) SOL OILY WASTE.Crl� SOLVENTS E1PSD PESTICIDES Ulh �/I 0c.c I BOTHER ORGANIC CHEMICALS - - _ OC INORGANIC CHEMICALS ACD ACIDS CAS BASES I MES HEAVY METALS IV. HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES fs«Aoo«a■rormow—rhu-cAsNi+ "m/ O r CATEGORY 02 SUBSTANCE NAME ry n rn r, 03 CAS NUMBER AGE.DISPOSAL METHOD 05 CONCENTRATION o" DD V. FEEDSTOCKS (so* Apo—rot cAsN—ft) CATEGORY 01 FEEDSTOCK NAME 02 CAS NUMBER CATEGORY 01 FEEDSTOCK NAME 02 CAS NUMBER FDS FDS FDS FDS FDS FDS FOS FDS VI. SOURCES OF INFORMATION fCe•aoear¢ ••"c•• •o •w•N••'•"Or•e"•ye''lop") AN EPA FORM 2070.12 (7.81( a-31 I. IDENTIFICATION POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE 01 STATE 1 02 SI r ®� E PAEINARY ASSESSMENT IDENTS PART 3 - DESCRIPTION OF HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCN 71. HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCIDENTS 01 A. GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION IN4 W / 02 ❑ OBSERVED (DATE: ) POTENTIAL G ALLEGED 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: � ( IQ -Wl fes 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION aced wde4- uMmafAt �.� ��► �irc�(,��d c��t�,��ah�� wry �.r �� .�) �// o u i cz, , wte t,-, ///oz 01 ❑ B. SURFACE WATER CONTAMINATION 02 ❑ OBSERVED (DATE: ) ❑ POTENTIAL ❑ ALLEGED 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION N1q O1 Cl C. CONTAMINATION OF AIR 02 E: OBSERVED (DATE: ) L' POTENTIAL 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION G ALLEGED 01 X D. FIRE/EXPLOSIVE CONDITIONS Wi 1 02 ❑ OBSERVED (DATE ) POTENTIAL C ALLEGED 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: lmi& 40 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION NYS DEC-{�Pr�01,InSr1S�li, c h f h I jtS G,,+t �%7 (NY C, F%o�s( n S 7 /o BO 01 ❑ E. DIRECT CONTACT 02 ❑ OBSERVED (DATE: ) ❑ POTENTIAL G ALLEGED 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION NIA 01 F. CONTAMINATION OF SOIL Gt��,.�V 02 C3 OBSERVED (DATE 03 AREA POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION (Ac-) ,6w, / ';- e/ pu-w C ALLEGED 03 (G. DRINKING WATER POTENTIALLY AFFECTED- Y"a 4 02 G OBSERVED (DATE. ) POTENTIAL ❑ ALLEGED 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION DIV ❑ F03WORKERS H. WORKER EXPOSUREIIWURY 02 ❑ OBSERVED (DATE: ) ❑ POTENTIAL ❑ ALLEGED POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION 4A 01 ❑ I. POPULATION EXPOSURE/NiJURY 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: m EPA FORM 2070.12 (7-E1) 02 ❑ OBSERVED (DATE: 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION 1� - 312 ) ❑ POTENTIAL ❑ ALLEGED POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION 01 ST E 02 SITE ®E�� PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT 119 `9 PART 3 - DESCRIPTION OF HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCIDENTS 'I. HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCIDENTS (cw tnod) 0 IV J. DAMAGE TO FLORA 02 RVED (DATE: ) ❑ POTENTIAL ❑ ALLEGED \ L TIRE DESCRIPTION 7a hlZA� Gt'4 /)10 /00 �i� (fj Ybec ,�l /Aved na ) 01 ❑ K. DAMAGE TO FAUNA 02 ❑ OBSERVED (DATE: 1 ❑ POTENTIAL 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION (mewfnrnflf)alfo.cny ❑ ALLEGED N14 01 L. CONTAMINATION OF FOOD CHAIN 02X1 OBSERVED (DATE: ) ❑ POTENTIAL ❑ ALLEGED 041NAARATiVE DESCRIPTION (NYSDEL ,�f2� �e� 01 XM. UNSTABLE CONTAINMENT OF WASTES II(7,3 wl, M r, 02 ❑ OBSERVED (DATE: I XPOTENTIAL (UMl N'ifra.q"..*WMWp dr Sj /� 7� 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION ❑ ALLEGED 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: Mp He .o / lace -&� ove 01 ❑ N. DAMAGE TO OFFSITE PROPERTY 02 Cl OBSERVED (DATE: ) ❑ POTENTIAL 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION ❑ ALLEGED N/A 01 ❑ O. CONTAMINATION OF SEWERS. STORM DRAINS, WWTPs 02 ❑ OBSERVED (DATE: 1 ❑ POTENTIAL b ALLEGED 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION NA 01 JX P. ILLEGAUUNAUTHORIZED DUMPING 02 Q OBSERVED (DATE: ) ❑ POTENTIAL 04 ARRATTV/E DESCRIPTION 1. � � /� /�A / f, /0/� t' tom^ 5 J TJ '/ /6c ALLEGED 4oe ���� Qe G'uoyjfi( &Aot4f_� - o , NYSbEC 6ET7a:ft. 7a %wN of 5-0N7f0l:.p 04TkP 400I79 05DESCRIPTION OFANY OTHER KNOWN. POTENTIAL, OR ALLEGED HAZARDS �% / m 7'>uch- �[.10�Ls.0 � O// /J0A Ae_4 J� :PA� 144V'f%/ Ill. TOTAL POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: lft%�Je 1041 ioCd IV. COMMENTS 5�(%.l�s/�°� div ley e.� "ti tll� Hca ,,.v . h�a� o/cc�s/� i Gi! : (l 7 �"� 0,,ZYn� .47 Oak i�,� oU2.�. LVIAnc.L 7oale�t �n,r� M �3) J �nS Po,/ed wA�B/ !v� bloru�►►� p�pvEs71�I,secf'.r,.yfMS'ti,� . V. SOURCES OF INFORMATION ICff fo.cme Mfr.nc.f .. p.. Nfff Nff. trroM. WYSY• npoMf) wcc2 ,o; e'i4w � 198Lt �i�� /6. S5 ono •ns PA FORM 2070.12 (7-e1) A - 33 2.4 EPA Form 2070-13 (Site Inspection Report) E281.2/227B 2-34 POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE L IDENTIFICATION r: FA SITE INSPECTION REPORT 01 STATE o R PART 1 - SITE LOCATION AND INSPECTION INFORMATION NY Qi/Oa p. SITE NAME AND LOCATION 0 t WTE NAME (LS• amw . w da= VO"at a") 02 STREET, ROUTE NO.. OR SPECIFIC LOCATION DEHTFIER OJ CITY = �h 04 STATE NY I OS ZF CODE 06 // 93 s COUNTY S /� 7 CODE OB CO N, DIST Do COOF004ATES 10 o LAii d � �� 1 • — — 7 z 2{L Q . — TYPE OF O%WERS ICmm* �! ❑ A. PRIVATE B. FEDERAL ❑ C. STATE ❑ D. COUNTY E. MUNICIPAL ❑ F. OTHER ❑ G. LWKNOYVN III. INSPECTION INFORMATION O t DATE of INSPECTION lZ 1/g , 8 / MOUTH DAN YEAP 02 s� STATUS ❑ INACTIVE 03 YEARS OF OPERATION 95/ I PR�SEN - { T -UNKNOWN 6EGINNING YEAR ENDING YEAR 04 AGENCY PERFOFMMN a INSPECTION fGoc* of Mw Wa+rl [j A. FPA ❑ B. EPA CONTRACTOR ❑ C. MUNICIPAL ❑ D. MUW-;r!i CONTRACTOR � (up n.W a,nl — ❑ E. STATE AF. STATE CONTRACTOR U A� ❑ G. OTHER " tswcwrl D5 CHEF INSPECTOR DAV 1'6 H1(is CA1-0 D6 TITLE $ Qo(o � 07 ORGANIZATION c� w6� OB TELEPHONE NO. 7,a,1 ��r-07o0 DO OTHER MPECTORS 10 TTTLE t t OPAGANLZATION 12 TELEPHONE NO. I ' 13 SITE REPRESENTATIVES WTERVIEWED Talvl� R, DOLA, as 14 TITLE fan 1, �-,( hon - y L.f. T 6AOORESSA /O � v iii a Y 16 TELEPHONE NO f5/6 ► J 1, CA o b; w Y,,-- o FNg l`e.IhLfiN �, ,, �1 �I II 17 ACCESS GAINED BY 1Drd �1 OWAFIRAHT 16 TME OF INSPECTION /1 00 p� rvl • 19 WEATHER CONDITIONS , J 5 UI)A J WG-fTY` IV. & FORKATION AVAILABLE FROM 01 CONTACT I I I {I I �p [ 02 OF (w•w,vr••N. r e (< I•6 03 TELEPHONE NO. 15(6 14 sr-yb z7 W PERSON RESP01iSIBLE FOR SITE INSPECTION FORM Do- 1// d O6 Y T10N Corowk.►,f- n 07 TELEPHONE NO a ��-9a6 -a8 �� 06 DATE /z sill MONTH/ OAY /YEAR EPA FORM 2070-1 (7+1) a - 3s POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE L IDENTIFICATIONE NUM t_sTnT� oz SITE INSPECTION REPORT DR SIT Lv N& FmFA PART 2 - WASTE INFORMATION STATES QUANTITIES AND CHARACTERISTICS p. WASTE , 02 WASTE QUANTITY AT SITE 03 WASTE CMAi+ACTERIST1CS rp�h ck r.rr WWII SOI, o PTf18K.AL STATES K rnerwwrJ °r wM ww"w" mkwJd A. TOXIC yo E. 80WBLE D 1. HIGHLY VOLATILE 1 A OOLID SLURRY OTHEKORGANIC CHEMICALS D B. CORROSIVE IO F. IFECT10llS ❑ J. EXPLOSIVE K. REACTIVE �❑,./E�. Q 0 PSR. FINES RC. LIOWO TONS ❑ C. RADIOACTIVE ❑ G. FLAMMABLE ❑ L. ; C. mUDGE D 0. GAS CUBIC YARDS -g 0. PERSISTENT ❑ H. IGNITABLE 0 L. NOT APPUCLLE O D. OT181 (50-ceyl NO. OF DRUMSm UI. wAM TYPE CATEGORY SUBSTANCE NAME 01 GAOSS AMOUNT D2 HINT OF MEASURE 03 COMMENTS I SLU SLUDGE uM . N OLW piLv WASTE SOI, SOLVENTS F so PESTICIDES OCC OTHEKORGANIC CHEMICALS K)C wORGANIC CHEMICALS Arlo ACIDS aAS BASES MES HEAVY METALS k/h IV. HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES 01 CATEGORY 02 SUBSTANCE NAME 03 CAS NUMBER 04 STORAGEMISPOSAL METHOD I 05 CONCENTRATION V. FEEDSTOCKS rs.. Aww--cAs ft -,&-I Ol FEEDSTOCK NAME 02 CAS NUMBER CATEGORY 01 FEEDSTOCK NAME 02 CAS NUMBER CATEGORY FDS FDS FDS FDS FDS FDS FDS FDS VL SOURCES OF INFORMjjAMN Noe. t «. • o.. %wr.��.[.....or.�w+ �•vo��I N YSD�C EPA FOIMA 2070.13 (741) a - 3.6 r �` • II I ,I POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE, IL IDENTIFICATION j � ATE 02 srt� R 1 aSPECTION IU Gor EFA REPORT I SITE I� PART S - DESCRIPTION OFINHAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCIDENTS ��pUS CONpIT1pNS AND piCfDENTS'POTENTIAL 1 02 ❑ OBSERVED 01 A. GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATKNI / 7 �4 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION ❑ ALLEGED ) ' POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: 04 Ao / �i'zm U'~� (5C 04:5 �-a iz/ii /91) 02 ❑ OBSERVED (DATE. _�) 01 ❑ B. SURFACE WATER CONTAMINATION D4 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION ❑ POTENTIAL C ALLEGED 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: / 1, 02^ OBSERVED (DATE _---I n1 I., C. CONTAMINATION OF ALR 02 NARRATIVE D(DATE IAN ^3 POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: ❑ POTENTIAL C. ALLEGED POPULATION Lol / 3 .w D. FREJEXPLOSIVE CONDITIONS 02 C OBSERVED (DATE �� pppULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED. / /l TR (4C4 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION POTENTIAL C ALLEGED / a� ,�►A . Gay c2�17>'ce 81A l; � d�A (-)YSDK P�dd ❑ ALLEGED 02 OBSERVED (DATE: ❑ POTENTIAL )POPULATION Fol❑ E. DIRECT CONTACT 04 NARRATIVE DEQ POTENTIALLY AFFECTED. N NIA 01 F. CONTAMINATION OF SOIL 02 C OBSERVED (DATE ) POTENTWL G ALLEGED Y AFFECTED: W) 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION 03 AAEAPOTELNTIALL µeI..l +/ 02 OBSERVED (DATE: ) POTENTIAL O ALLEGEDDRINKING WATER CONTAMINATIOIN //M i '► w�A+ 004.NARRATIVE 4 ()3 CATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: � 02 ❑ OBSERVED (DATE: ) ❑ POTENTIAL ❑ ALLEGED Ot ❑ H. WORKER ENPO1-LY AFFECT 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION O3 yyp�(ERS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: A 02 ❑OBSERVED (DATE: ) ❑ POTENTIAL ❑ ALLEGED O1 O I. POPULATION E)IPONJURY 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION 03 pppU(1.TION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: N/A EPA FORM 2070-13 (741 I a--3? POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE L IDENTIFICATION SITE INSPECTION REPORT 1 STATE 02 R CFA PART 3 - DESCRIPTION OF HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCIDENTS L K&ZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCIDENTS ica..+.w, 01 r J DAMAGE TO FLORA D2gOBSERVED (DATE: 1 // 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED 04 W~TNE DFSCPoPTION f� d �°h waa rL of d too �#" �,-o I� � NYS DSC �tLd i nS�G�°� I 01 0 K. DAMAGE TO FAUNA 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE: 1 O POTENTIAL ❑ALLEGED 04 NAFilAT1VE DESCRIPTION mca m n.n.r.1 of w.e+u NIA ( 01 j L. CONTAMINATION OF FOOD CHAIN 02,XOBSERVED (DATE' 1 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED DESCRIPTION t (AJ YS DEC Fiefi i . ) 1 1 31 M. UNSTABLE CONTAINMENT OF WASTES llg3 wl � 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE. ) OTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFF f CTED: 04 NARRATIVE DESCRWTION f .�-GuVl'� 01 O N DAMAGE TO OFFSITE PROPERTY a _ 02 D OBSERVED (DATE. 1 0 POTENTIAL C ALLEGE 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION N/A 01 D O. CONTAMINATION OF SEWERS. STORM DRAINS. WWTPS 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE' ) 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED 04 NARiATTVE DESCRIPTION 01 A P. tLLEGALIUNAUTHORIZED DUMPING 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE 1 0 POTENTIAL ALLEGED 04 TTVE DgSCRIPTION Acce�teJ s5 0-4100 �� JJ/7��ev� � �i�w'�( �� /yOfff��k 14irA 4 a4 Weo A4 (NY,ipEC LEj' A, 7D 7P K40 OF SouTllot-� A,1T�0 /1�/O��i� 05 DESCRIPTION OF1ANY OTHER KNOWN. POTENTIAL ORA ALLEGED HAZARDS A ,/ J / Z*AX tl Et TOTAL POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: w/>'hiYl / rKr/ua FV. COWAENTS :.'la# �Q Kvfc-) ll�wfed 'm % Co o� tee._ -Z o c c �-'5 i PA4 � 0.,.CA M : C/ � I/) suy �,1iyO� I/� � P",O /ed �'S, CY) bkwfAj (s) V. SOURCES OF INFORMATION ec.. w.rfic M«.1.c.... o ..se. ■....rvW. wm'r.+..o°"'. EPA FORM2070-13 (7.61( -2 - 3 P- 4 r POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE SITE INSPECTION PART 4 - PERMIT AND DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION . PERMIT INFORMATION 02 PERfATT tilllMaER ' 01 TYPE OF P£RsxT tSSUED 1 2G�.o' d wr cD�rl ❑ A. NPCES ❑ B. INC i ❑ C. AIR ❑ D. nCRA ❑ E. RCRA INTERIM STATUS r O F. SPCC PLAN G. STATE rso«Arl D H. LOCALfso«*n Cl I. OTHER rs.. oo I C J NONE 03 DATE ISSUED I DI Lxjgr AT10N DATE I D5 COMMENTS 1. IDENTIFICATION )1 STATFJ 02 Srjq- )(I SITE DESCRIPTION UHrT tkEASURE 02 AMOUNT 03 a �ATMENT�*of" mOdr, 01 STORAGEfDtSPOSAL IC�rct�tl�.00M u/h / N+ D A. CNCENERATION �(A. SURFACE I.IPOUNDNIEIIT D B. UNDERGROUND INJECTION a D B. PILES D C. C IEMICALIPHYSICAL D C. DRUMS. ABOVE GROUND D D. BIOLOGICAL D D. TANK. ABOVE GROUND D E. WASTE OIL PROCESSING D E. TANK. BELOW GROUND D F. SOLVENT RECOVERY XF. LANDFILL D G. OTHER RECYCLW_rRECOVERY D G. LANDFARM MP D H. OTHER lso.�•r, rA-AW- 05 OTHER xA. BUILDINGS ON SITE 06 AREA OF SITE ❑ H. OPEN DU ❑ 1. OTHER 07 CommENTS (�D1► 104 (, li .ld =� �If Hifi w� AGI c �%'�� i �� 17 ac IV. CONTAINMENT oI CONTAINMENT OF WASTES ram m»1 D D. INMCURE. UNSOUND, DANGEROUS ❑ A_ ADEQUATE, SECURE D B. MODERATE )(C. 6�IADEOUATE, POOR 02 pRt11.tS. pKIHG. LINERS. BARRIERS. ETC. /a.ce d 'e� � X" -d 67-06+st d V. ACCESSIBILITY D YESNoal !% ASTE EASILY 02�COMMENTS 77t ol 444 �: yy AI Cie d VL SOURCES OF INFOR ATIO EPA FORK 2070-13 (7-81) a-39 POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE L IDENTIFICATION ®�®��� SITE INSPECTION REPORT of NATE o2 Sr h ER PART S - WATER, DEMOGRAPHIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA /Y ► �l IL DRINKING WATER SUPPLY 01 TYPE OF DRPOGNG SUPPLY 02 STATUS OS DISTANCE TO SITE SURFACE WELL ENDANGERED AFFECTED MONITORED COMMUl ry A. ❑ B.)i� A. ❑ B. ❑ C.)( A. NON-OOY C. ❑ D. D. ❑ E. ❑ F. ❑ B.) IN. GROUNDWATER 01 GROUNDWATER USE N VICINITY,c&.c* w.) ONLY SOURCE FOR DRINI NO ❑ B. DRNKNG ❑ C. COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL. IRRIGATION ❑ D. NOT USED. UNUSEASLE ,Oln.r+ws,./.wrllAwl a mw orw 8m.c omft m/) COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL. IRRIGATION f� a0i.r w1.r lo�/CM amd w) 0 mi 4, 'MIN SERVED BY GROUNDWATER Q7 DISTANCE TO NEAREST DBS :w/ 7ATER WELL—AJ j6!^ (mi) D4 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER L mak- 2- 50 05 DIRECTION OF GROUNDWATER FLOW N O6 DEPTH TO AQUIFER OF CONCERN 07 POTENTIAL YIELD OF AOUIFER 0e SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER x)tAf7I1c w �.. 1�2. ti14AAM0 (AM (YES o NO .lova) 09 DESCFWTION OF WELLS (k chcwv umme. awm. aw be bw rower- a o1+Prnoaw.wbuku+pa) tam -4 A lL A -r c k te& M. o f -e .. �u.�h C,,,d �K /..�, t" ,o� fi ig e. a. --e 4 i-� k 10 RECHARGE AREA �L 3coo J fes+ 11 DISCHARGE AREA YES COMMENTS rke,,e C _/�`_ b � J ❑ YES COMMENTS ❑ NO ❑ NO IV. SURFACE WATER 01 SURFACE WATERUSE(Clwaow) A. RESERVOf CREA ❑ B. IRRIGATION, ECONOMICALLY ❑ C. COMMERCIAL, PDUSTRIAL ❑ D. NOT CURRENTLY USED DRINKING WA E IMPORTANT RESOURCES 02 AFFECTEDIPOTENTULLIY AFFECTED BODIES OF WATER NAME:// 7 (r AFFECTED DISTANCE TO SITE mon 161�4 �c, c -d / ❑ (mi) ❑ (mi) V. DEMOGRAPHIC AND PROPERTY INFORMATION 01 TOTAL POPULATION WITHIN 02 DISTANCE TO NEAREST POPULATION ONE (1) MILE OF SITE TWO (2) MILES OF SITE MILES OF SITE A. /a3 B. 2 / 75 C. tf 79 2- (ml1 NO OFPERSONS NO OF PERSONS NO OFPERSONS OJ NMABER OF BUILDNGS WnI-m TWO (2) MILES OF SITE 04 D9STANCE TO NEAREST OFF-SITE BUILDING - /D !y d (ml) 06 POPULATION WITHIN VICINITY OF SITE (no'.«w n.rr.e.. a aupoon a n.run aow�rlw ...r .o1rF Dim". e.g., a..c .�v.. �Irr Dap41w I.ew r.y rrA"—'*W Z970.17 (7-01) POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE BLIODENTIFICATION � �SITE INSPECTION REPORT TE 02PART 5 - WATER, DEMOGRAPHIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA VI. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION o 1 PERMEABILITY OF UNSATURATED ZONE iChwo aw) ❑ A. 10-6 — 10-6 cIIVNc ❑ B. 1 O-4 — 10-6 uNmec ❑ C. 10-4 — 10-3 clNwc XD. GREATER THAN 10-3 CM/MC 02 PERmEABCJTY OF BEDROCK iCIrM ar) A. IMPERMEABLE ❑ B. RELATNELY IMPERMEABLE ❑ C. RELATNELY PERMEABLE ❑ D. VERY PERMEABLE R...p— 10-60_r j (10-4- 10-6 C-00c) 110-2- 10-4aw wc/ faMti.M IO-2 a...cl O3 DEPTH TO BEDROCK 04 DEPTH OF CONTAW"TED SOIL ZONE D5 SOIL pH 750 aA'k� LtM �LN o c�M (n) D6 NET PRECIPITATION 07 ONE YEAR 24 HOUR RAINFALL 06 SLOPE 17 2'7 SITE SLOPE DIRECTION OF SITE SLOPE TERRAIN AVERAGE SLOPE (in) (n) _°�3'0x �yV/ Q— 3,0 x i 109 FLOOD POTENTIAL 10 i ❑ SITE IS ON BARRIER ISLAM. COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA. RIVERINE FLOODWAY SITE IS IN YEARFLOODPLAIN I I DISTANCE TO WETLANDS is -m ten) 12 DISTANCE TO ORTTICAL HABITAT i.W.�v..e.p.c+u ESTUARINE OTHER lel A. (IM) B. ON) ENDANGERED SPECIES: 13 LAND USE IN VICWITY DISTANCE TO: RESIDENTIAL AREAS: NATIONAL/STATE PARKS. AGRICULTURAL LANDS COMMERCIAIJINDUSTRIAL FORESTS. OR WILDLIFE RESERVES PRIME AG LAND AG LAND A 3.0 (11r) B. � (�,) C. (•M) D. ( ) 14 DESCRIPTION OF SITE IN RELATION TO SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY VII. SOURCES OF INFORMATION MAN spout r..K ca.. a e X.-L "oft dfo .. MOWN) USGS� i9sG iV - -I/,/ m RI H1 BL w s9 ;L f3PA FOM 2070-13 V y i 1 r a EPA FORM 2o7o-13 (7-011 POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE,SITE I: IDENTIFICATION SITE INSPECTION REPORT 0 ^ STATE 02 SfTE NIM � `! N PART 7.OWNER INFORMATION tL CURRENT OWNERS) PARENT COMPANY f•4cok--bf•1 /� / 2D+BNUMBER NAME 120 OPD+BNUMBER SIC CODE ST7fET ADOfiFSS v. .RFD •, .K., cm = CODE 0 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. ft.. RFD •. •fc.) , , . PS STATE 7 ZIP CODE 12 CRY 13 STATE 14 DP CODE P6 crry �►� NY 11W 2 D+S NUMBER 08 NAME 09 D+B NUMBER p t NAME J STREET ADDRESS O.O tt+o.. AFD I. •ee.l $IC CODE 10 STREET ADDRESS (P.O &a . RFD •, ae ) 11 SIC CODE STATE 07 ZIP CODE 12 CITY 13 STATE '14 ZIP CODE 05 CITY 02 0+8 NUMBER OB NAME ^q D+� NUai-i=R 01 NAME 04 SIC CODE 10 STREET ADDRESS (P. o. Me. RFD •. •tc 1 1, SIC CODE Ol STREET ADDRESS!►•0. Boa. AFD •, •fe.l STATE 07 ZIP CODE 12 CITY 13 STATE 14 ZIP CODE OS 6xiY 02 D+0 NUMBER 06 NAME 09 D+B NUMBER 1 NAME -10 STREET ADDRESS fP.0 Sm. RFD •. etc 1 11 SIC CODE OJ STREET ADDRESS I►.0. (.b., RFD •. •tc.) r6� 07 ZIP CODE 12 CITY 13 STATE 14 ZP CODE DS CITY D6 STAI ;IL PREVIOUS OWNER(S) mw w-cwrsal IV. REALTY OWNER(S) r•.00acam rr—mf.'Man+a 02 D+B NUMBER Ol NAME dor%a 02 D+B NUMBER C�� (.a l� Ot NAME a ,yam ,� o w SIC CODE 0.7 STREET ADDRESS rv. o aq.. RFD •. • c.) Da SIC CODE 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. Sm. RFD •. ac.l oe STATE 07 ZIP CODE 05 C(TY De STATE 07 ZIP CODE OS CITY 02 D+B NUMBER 01 NAME 02 D+B NUMBER 01 NAME SIC CODE 03 STREET ADDRESS (P 0 b•. RFD •. orc.) 04 SIC CODE 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. b•. RFD P. •ac.) T STATE 07 ZIP CODE OS CITY 0(1 STA 07 ZIP CODE 05 CITY 02 D+B NUMBER oi NAME 02 D+B NUMBER 01 NAME 04 SIC CODE 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. bm RFD •. 64c.1 04 SIC CODE oa STREET ADDRESS (P.O. eo.. RFD •, .fs.) STATE 07 ZIP CODE STATE 07 ZIP CODE OS CITY V. S"CES OF INFORMATION •a.. +e ftL a-wr". OF,roil (,vccl of he All"r ( 'Ho /I a EPA FORM 2o7o-13 (7-011 POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE 1. IDENTIFICATION 02 SrrE N R SITE INSPECTION REPORT °1 STA IA f M PART e - OPERATOR INFORMATION t CURRENT OPERATOR OPERATOR'S PARENT COMPANY (rs�+er) 101 liAilf 02 D+6 NUMBER 10 NAME 11 D+B NUMBER '90 /'�nQ-fir 03 04 BIC CODE 12 STREET ADDRESS M.D. ft-. WOO. we.) 13 SIC CODE CoAt'C 10--IR-1 • 05 CITY O6 STATE 07 ZIP COOS 14 CITY 15 STATE 16 ZIP CODE PP GOBI I C w Il/93 s O6 YEARS OF OPERATION 00 NAME OF OWNER NL PREVIOUS OPERATOR(S) (um owmo--ro--,#f gam""""+ -0 .0 PREVIOUS OPERATORS' PARENT COMPANIES rn.ow�.au 01 NAME D+B NUMBER ) 10 NAME 1 1 D + B NUMBER I /Y ,.) , 4 � CF. O -f.'%?-- � 12,0 - 103 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. 0-- Aso s. we) 04W CIODE CODE 12 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. Ow. Rso •. !LL74 a 05 CITY 06 STATE 107 ZIP CODE 14 CITY DE 16 YEARS OF OPERATION 109 NAME OF OWNER DURING THIS PERIOD 99 O1 NAME 02 Dt8 NUMBER 10 NAME 1 t D+B NUMBER 0.7 Sl AEET ADDRESS (P.O. /oa. Rf0 o. wc.l W SIC CODE 12 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. mm. Aso 0. ex.) 13 SIC CODE «TY 06 STATE 07 ZIP CODE 14 CITY 715STATEFISZIP CODE 06 YEARS OF OPERATION 09 NAME OF OWNER DURING THIS PERIOD 02 D+B NUMBER 01 NAME 10 NAME t 1 D+B NUMBER O4 SIC CODE 12 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. /o+. RFD0. we.) 13 SIC CODE 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. fr... I1fD rr. weJ 7 05 CITY 06 STATE 07 ZIP CODE 14 CRY 15 STATE , 6 ZIP CODE O6 YEARS OF OPERATION 1 00 NAME OF OWNER DURING THIS PERIOD IV. SOURCES OF INFORMATION (cr w,we Mwr.c«. ca.. awe r.... ww"o..own) bUcCI loi k ,,W/ie �bn / AW EPA FORM 2070.13 pa 1) .;2 —/7 POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE 1. IDENTIFICATION �E�� SITE INSPECTION REPORT O' *TATE 02 BER PART 0 - GENERATORITRANSPORTER INFORMATION /V IL ON-SITE GENERATOR Ol NAME NIA 02 D+B NUMBER 6, 1)q- � old kc Q' pk 1 - 70up, v� �O6*� olA 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. Amac nFD.. ow.) 04 SIC CODE 05 C(TY 08 STATE 07 ZIP CODE Ill. OFF-SITE GENERATOR(S) 01 NAME o i o L)a 02 D+B NUMBER Ca h tCe 01 NAME 02 D+B NUMBER 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. Aba. RFD.. etc.) 04 SAC CODE 03 STREET ADDRESS (P O iw. RFD i. «c I W SIC CODE D5 CTTY 06 STATE 07 ZIP CODE 05 CCTV 106 STATE C7 :IP CODE 01 NAME 02 D+B NUMBER 01 NAME 02 D+B NUMBER 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. a=. AFD P. me.) 04 SAC CODE 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O ow. RFD #..(c) 04 SAC CODE 05 CITY STATE 07 ZAP CODE 05 CITY 06 STATE 07 ZIP CODE IV. TRANSPORTER(S) 01 NAME 02 D+B NUMBER 120 it fAO' 7a -%'ori a o C- 01 NAME 02 D4-6 NUMBER 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. am. AFD P. ac.) 04 SIC CODE 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.D am. RFOI. etc.) D4 SAC CODE 05 CITY D6 STATE 07 ZIP CODE 05 C(TV 06 STATE 07 ZAP CODE 01 NAME 02 D+B NUMBER Ot NAME 02 D+B NUMBER 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. Aa, AFD o. aft.) 04 SIC CODE 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. Alae. AFD e. Me.) 04 SAC CDDE 06 CITY STATE 07 ZP CODE "C" 06 STATE 07 11P CODE V. SOURCES OF INFORMATION (ca. w.. mm.. o.. q.....�or ra+.ry.ra. Room) Oiccl ,ai �e/ons /f24 er^r%pw zumvla If -s1) �2 - y.s v r POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE L IDENTIFICATION Jl STATO 02 SRE SITE INSPECTION REPORT PART 10 - PAST RESPONSE ACTIVITIES IL I•AST EI£SPOKSE ACTMTIES 01 E-1 A. WATER SUPPLY CLOSED 04 OESCFVMON' 02 DATE /0�3 AGENCY_ /y� /� ,G / D 12t0r ' / 6e � b7% Di ❑ B. TEMPORARY WATER SUPPLY PROVIDED 02 DATE 03 AGENCY _ 04 DE9f.'RFrION 0l ❑ C. PERMANENT WATER SUPPLY PROVIDED 02 DATE 03 AGENCY _ 04 DEQ TION 121 Ot ❑ D. SPILLED MATERIAL REMOVED 02 DATE 03 AGENCY _ 04 DESCRIPTION NTAMNATFDSOREMOVED -- 01 ❑E.COIL - 02 DATE 03ACEI74 04 DESCRIPT) NrN n - 01 ❑ F. WASTE REPACKAGED 02 DATE 03 AGENCY _ 04 DESCRIPTION nn Ot ❑ G. WASTE DISPOSED ELSEWHERE 02 DATE 03 AGENCY _ 04 DESCRIPTION 01 ❑ H. ON SITE BURIAL 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESCMPTION n O1 ❑ I. N SITU CHEMICAL TREATMENT 02 DATE 03 AGENCY _ 04 DESCRIPTION 4%/ a- Ot ❑ J. IN SITU SK)LOGICAL TREATMENT 02 DATE 03 AGENCY _ 04 DESCRIPTION 01 ❑ K. N SITU PHYSICAL TREATMENT 02 DATE i 03 AGENCY _ 04 DESCRIPTION 12 Ot ❑ L. ENCAPSULATION 02 DATE 03 AGENCY _ 04 DESCRIPTION //1/'a--� 01 ❑ M. EMERGENCY WASTE TREATMENT 02 DATE 03 AGENCY . 04 DESCRIPTION 01 ❑ N. CUTOFF WALLS 02 DATE 03 AGENCY . 04 DESCRIPTION 01 ❑ O. EMERGENCY DWJNGISURFACE WATER DIVERSION 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DEBCR1PT10N Ot ❑ P. CUTOFF/ TRENCHES/SUMP 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION Oi ❑ 0. SUBSURFACE CUTOFF WALL 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION n , �•a-, EPA FORM 2070-13 (7-81) r a 0 9 d POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE L 004WI CATION SITE INSPECTION REPORT FFA 01 y 02 R PART 10 - PAST RESPONSE ACTIVITIES 9 PAST RESPONSE ACTTVMES rc .wmwi of D R. BARRIER WALLS CONSTRUCTED 02 DATE 03 AGENCY CA DE9CFVFTION 20 L/�/ a-) D1 D S. 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION 01 ❑ T. BULK TANKAGE REPAIRED 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESCRFTION /•et- 01 D U. G PDLFT CURTAIN CONSTRUCTED 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION /• W of ❑ V. BOTTOM SEALED 02 DATE 03 AGENCY_ 04 DESCFAPT'*l 01 W. GAS CONTROL 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04'DESCRIPTION (,t i j 7' e 114, iD (.)n ���k' W 1/ 01 ❑ X. FM CONTROL 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION 01 ❑ Y. LEACHATE TREATMENT 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESCR1PT10N , 01 D Z. AREA EVACUATED 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION / of ❑ 1. ACCESS TO SITE RESTRICTED 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION 01 D 2. POPULATION RELOCATED 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION , 01 ❑. 3. OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVRIES 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESCRPTION IL SOURCES OF INFORMATION Ice. W..ft ,.,.,Wm ....e.. awe ohm. mwafw wcGl ��� ,,� LT7or1 � /y8'jrC H-03 y FTA F0F*A 207413 (7♦1) a -y7 L�. L IDENTIFICATION POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE 01 A oz -- n I'T• SITE INSPECTION REPORT Toa CRA PART 11- ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION rxa IL EWO.RCEmENT INFORMATION C" FAv FEGLLAMRyMFCF� AcnoN XYES ❑ NO 02 OF FEDERAL. STATE. LOCAL FEG"TORY/EPFOFiCEbENi ACT10N E ^L C o � /AjsT 7"ft 7DWiJ of Au' -0 � •. N YSD>� L 6 � LAnOFi�tr a.�N21� 7D �RS�ST��-i vi91,Aiioluf 7Z) P7' 3(ao M60GAlioAS 1A) G,"J.DF/t C, ofE2Ano,�S �- Y5 b6G i h�� n rJ�ed 7' Vv' (IIJ0171) - OR & on CCn„" 51/6 /979 - . v inQjj, pint o � 6 tiYCgR 'o /xv)-coen A+--� 0/) da�_j (eXjjZjfae ,ol 410 CFR NYS �dNYCRR Paf 703 why tom, L A,ld �e "l uri o%r 0/1 "1 � w� / � A-Cfd - m SOURCES OF INFORMATION (oft .owemwwhc m..a..mwOPfts•..Oft•rr+...som) SCD#S 17.etvwrot &c,, 2/iz17d. _ NYSDEG CESS D�t7�p //io/71_1 ra �F S�Unlinc� • EPA FoRm207D-13(7-®1) Y 2 —� ti t TABLE I SOURCES OF INFORMATION Albany, NY 12237 Justice Bldg.-Rm 245 Michael Moore 12-12-84 Albany, NY 13224 State Campus Louise Inglis Bldg. No. 8, Room 805 Albany, NY 12235 50 Wolf Road Albany, NY 12233 12-13-84 12-14-84 various 12/84; (518) 474-1190 2/85 various, 12/84 (518) 457-2713 various, 12/84 (518) 457-5668 Office/ Agency Location Contact Person Date of Visit Date of Phone Telephone .";_r.red :'ensseloer County tes Conversation Number C,,.,cal NYSDEC Division of Fish & Wildlife Wildlife Resources Center Larry Brown 12-11-84 several, 12/84 (518) 439-7486 ,%coats Significant Habitats Unit Delmar, NY 12054 t.ro Specific rrwmarion NYSDEC Division of Solid and 3 Vatrano Road Albany, NY Hans Dirzuweit 12 -12 -4 - several, 12/84 (518) 457-2051 Hazardous Waste, Bureau Earl Barcomb 12-14-84 of Municipal Waste srnric/ NYS Dept. of Parks, Agency Bldg 01 Lenore Kuwick 12-12-84 various, 12/84 (518) 474-3176 ,.-ifnark Recreation & Historic Empire State Plaza '.fes Preservation Albany, NY 12238 Division for Historic Preservation +q lkymds NYSDEC Division of Fish & Albany, NY Sharon O'Connor 12/84 (518) 457-3431 Wildlife, Habitat Inventory Unit r-shwater & NYSDEC-Region I Bldg ¢40 Mike Fiscina several, 12/84; (5!6,-:;-1389 L.2%toI SUNY I /85 Xnrl etlns in Stony Brook, NY 11794 '.:ssnu & Suffolk unties • reshwater NYSDEC-Region II 2 World Trade Center Joe Pane various, 12/84 (212) 488-2758 ._x1 Coastal Rm 6126 -tlmds in New York, NY 10047 ngs County feshwoter :rxl Coastal NYSDEC-Region IV Rt. 10, Stamford, Maynard Vance various, 12/84 (607) 652-7364 New York 12167 Netlands in Albany and :ensseloer "ounties `A,! Specific formation NYS Dept. of Health Division Health Risk Corning Tower Ron Tramontano 12-12-84 various, 12/84 (518) 473-8427 of Bldg., ESP Steve Bates Albany, NY 12237 Justice Bldg.-Rm 245 Michael Moore 12-12-84 Albany, NY 13224 State Campus Louise Inglis Bldg. No. 8, Room 805 Albany, NY 12235 50 Wolf Road Albany, NY 12233 12-13-84 12-14-84 various 12/84; (518) 474-1190 2/85 various, 12/84 (518) 457-2713 various, 12/84 (518) 457-5668 Control, Bureau of Toxic Substance Assessment `-te Specific NYS Law Department nformation- :'ensseloer County tes Agricultural/ NYS Dept. of Agriculture 'rime Agri- and Markets, Divison -vltural Land of Rural Affairs :n Production .Vater NYSDEC Division of Resources Water Resources Albany, NY 12237 Justice Bldg.-Rm 245 Michael Moore 12-12-84 Albany, NY 13224 State Campus Louise Inglis Bldg. No. 8, Room 805 Albany, NY 12235 50 Wolf Road Albany, NY 12233 12-13-84 12-14-84 various 12/84; (518) 474-1190 2/85 various, 12/84 (518) 457-2713 various, 12/84 (518) 457-5668 TABLE 1 E78/205 SOURCES OF INFORMATION (continued) ata Office/ Contact Date of Date of Phone Telephone athered Agency Location Person Visit Conversation Number cite Specific NYSDEC 50 Wolf Rd. Anita Grikstas 12-14-84 (518) 457-0639 Information Division of Solid & Albany, NY 12233 Hazardous Waste ,ite Specific Rensselaer County County Office Bldg. John Sheehan 12-27-84 several, 12/84; (518) 270-2670 nformation- Health Dept. 1600 7th Ave. 2/85 ,tensselaer Troy, NY 12180 County Sites ;ite Specific Albany County South Ferry and Cliff Forando 12-28-84 several, 12/84 (518) 445-7835 formation- Health Dept. Green Streets Steve Lukowski Albany County Albany, NY 12201 Ben Pierson 1. es lite Enforce- NYSDEC 202 Mamaroneck Ave. Mike Tone several, 12/84; (914) 761-6660 :Hent Division of Environ- White Plains, NY 10601 1/85 mental Enforcement IISEPA USEPA-Region 11 26 Federal Plaza Carol Peterson several, 12/84; (212) 264-4197 "_RRIS" .Site Hazardous Waste New York. NY 10278 Kathy Moyk j/85 (212) 264-8672 t,ljmbers Site Branch Site Specific NYSDEC-Region IV 2176 Guilderland Ave. George Elston various, 12/84; (518) 382-0680 ;nformation- Schenectady, NY 12306 Mike Styk 1/85 lt,any and 0,ensselaer County Sites Site Specific Suffolk Co. Dept. 15 Horse Block Pl. Frank Randall various 11/84; (516) 451-4633 Information- of Health Services Farmingville, NY Jim Pim 12/84 `vtfolk County - Jim Maloney Sites Site Specific Nassau Co. Dept. 240 Old Country Road Joe Schechter 12/13/84 (516) 535-2406 information- of Health Mineola, NY Larry Sang Nassau County 'Sites ',Yater Supply in Suffolk Co. Dept. 225 Rabro Dr. East Paul Ponturo 12/7/84 (516) 348-2886 Suffolk Co. of Health Services Hauppauge, NY 11788 Richard Meyer Site Specific NYSDEC Region II 2 World Trade Center Armand DeAngelis 12/7/84 (212) 488-3862 Information- New York, NY Sal Ervolina 12/26/84 Kings County Sites Site Specific NYCDEP 2358 Municipal Bldg. Tim Slauson 12/27/84 (212) 669-8934 Information- New York, NY 10007 Anthony lanarelli 12/20/84 (212) 669-8939 Kings County Sites Stacy Moriates 12/7/84 (212) 566-8977 Stan Cepenberg 12/10/84 (212) 566-2717 Kim Sparber 12/10/84 (212) 566-1647 Site Specific NYSDEC Building 40 Bob Schneck various (515) 751-7900 Information- Region I SUNY at Stonybrook Bob Becherer 12/84 NYSDEC Region I & 11 Sites Well Points NYSDEC Building 40 Tony Candella 12/12/84 (516) 751-7900 NYSDEC Region I SUNY at Stonybrook Region J & II Well Points Sites IF E78/205 r 11 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The Southold Landfill is located on North Road, Cutchogue, New York. The Southold Landfill is located in the northeast part of Long Island, in Suffolk County, and is about 50 feet above mean sea level (USGS, 1956). The site occupies an area of 41 acres, however, the active landfill area is only 20 acres (Figure 1). The site is situated in a predominantly agricultural area. The topography of the site is generally flat with a borrow pit depression approximately 50 feet deep along its eastern margin. At its west margin, there are two depressions that comprise two septic sludge lagoons. The area slopes downward gently (0-1.0%) from northwest to southeast towards Cutchogue Harbor located approximately 2.3 miles from the site and is part of the Great Peconic Bay. Long Island Sound is located to the north, approximately one mile from the site. The site is fenced in and has a security guard 10 hrs/day, controlled entry and signs posted. A guard shack, collection center and a storage building are located on site. There is a paved road along the southwestern edge of the landfill. E281.3/227B 3-1 _ i 4 4.0 SITE DATA 4.1 SITE AREA SURFACE FEATURES The Southold Landfill site is located in an area that slopes downward gently (0- 1.0%) from northwest to southeast towards Cutchogue Harbor, which is part of the Great Peconic Bay and is located approximately 2.3 miles from the site. Long Island Sound is located toward the north, approximately one (1) mile frcm the site. No critical wildlife habitats are located within 3 miles. However the Old House and the Fort Corchaug Site are historic or landmark sites located within that distance. The predominant land use in the site area is agricultural. Two cemeteries and one school are located within one mile of the site. 4.2 SITE HYDROGEOLOGY 4.2.1 Ground -Water Occurrence The Southold Landfill is located in an area mantled with outwash deposits which overlie stratified sand with some gravel deposits. The borrow pit along the east side of the landfill shows a stratigraphic section of interbedded sand and gravel with dark beds of clayey silt. Ground water in this area occurs in lenses of variable thickness from a few feet up to several hundred feet (Franke and McClymonds, 1972). The thickness of these coarse grained deposits beneath the landfill is about 140 feet. The saturated part of these coarse grained deposits is approximately 85 feet and is known as the Upper Glacial aquifer. It is a water table aquifer and constitutes the only source of drinking water in this region. Below these deposits there is a clay layer approximately - 50 feet thick which is believed to be quite extensive. Below this layer a second saturated coarse grained deposit approximately 50 feet is found (SCDHS Memorandum, ----- 1981). E281.4/227B 4-1 The water level in the vicinity of the site is between 42 and 50 feet below the ground surface. The movement of ground water in the Upper aquifer is in a northwest direction towards the Long Island Sound. Since the surficial materials are in general very permeable, recharge to the ground water occurs by infiltration of rainfall through these materials. 4.2.2 Ground -Water Quality The fresh ground water of Suffolk County is generally good. Less than 100 ppm -f dissolved solids are typical. Ground -water qualit; :n -7tie prox-:-pity of the site is unknown. However, it probably has. deteriorated due to a suspected leachate plume emanating from the Southold Landfill and/or due to the agricultural practices of the area. In 1981, one on site' well was tested for pesticides (endrin, lindane, methoxychlor, toxaphene), herbicides (2, 4-D and silvex), trace metals and other parameters. The results showed that no pesticides or herbicides were present, metals were below maximum levels allowed in drinking water and only chloride (270 mg/I), color (30) and total dissolved solids (1500 mg/1) were in excess of the maximum values allowed. A pH of 6.4 and a conductivity of 2900 (umhos/cm) were measured. The concentration of PCB measured was 0.4 ppb (ERCO, 1981). The water quality of the aquifer below the clay layer has been reported to be -- of satisfactory quality for drinking purposes (SCDHS, 1981). However, underneath this �._ area the deep Magothy and the Lloyd aquifers are said to contain salty water (Franke and McClymonds, 1972). I- 4.2.3 Ground -Water Use There is no public water supply available in the vicinity of the site. However, part of the area within a 3 -mile radius of the site is served by public supply wells managed by the Captain Kidd Water Co. serving Mattituck, and the Greenport Water District serving Greenport Village. Private wells supply water used for drinking and farm irrigation. These wells tap only the Upper Glacial aquifer (Jensen and Soren, 1974). E28 1.4/227B 4-2 Approximately 6,500 people within a 3 -mile radius of the site rely on ground water as a source of drinking water. 4.3 PAST SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS Past sampling and analysis included samples from wells located on site and within the general area of the site. See Section 4.2.2 Ground Water Quality for a description of analytical results. f'a results of the analyses are in, -luded in Appendix B. E28 1.4/227B 4-3 t 5.0 DATA ADEQUACY The data were somewhat adequate for scoring the HRS work sheets. The one exception was the score for Hazardous Waste Quantity. The amount of hazardous substances is not known although its existence is verified by the presence of hazardous compounds within leachate emanating from the landfill. The factor is, therefore, scored The existence of leachate is supported by on -site. -wall- data which is the basis for arriving at a score of 45 for Observed Release. The Observed Release score together with the Targets score result in a relatively high Ground Water Route score. The Surface Water Route score, on the other hand, is relatively low, due in large part to the very low Targets score. Again, the Hazardous Waste Quantity is scored a (1). E281.5/22713 5-1 4 6.0 WORK PLAN 6.1 OBJECTIVES The objective of this proposed work plan is to collect field information required to prepare a final HRS score and develop conceptual remedial designs and cost estimates. Since there is not much information about the hydrogeology and the ground -water quality at the landfill site, .the work plan will address basic questions concerning +tie presence of site contamination and ground -water flow and quality. The presence of a suspected leachate plume emanating from the site and the proximity to agricultural lands in the area suggest that potential health hazards may exist. The following work plan was developed under the assumption that existing wells on the site or in the site vicinity were not useable. In the event that sufficient data indicates that these wells have been installed properly and have been properly secured, the following work plan may be modified to include sampling of selected existing wells and possibly the installation of two or three new wells. The estimated time for drilling would subsequently be reduced. The remainder of the work plan shall remain the some. 6.2 FIELD INVESTIGATION PLAN 6.2.1 Preliminary Site Investigations A preliminary site visit will be made to tentatively select the monitoring -well locations, to evaluate the means of drill rig access in each case, and to identify property owners if access is required off site. In addition, a thorough site reconnaissance will be performed, and a survey of volatile organic emissions will be conducted close to any exposed barrels, using an HNU meter, Model PI 101. It is estimated that 2 person - days will be required for this work. E281.6/22713 6-1 I� t 6.2.2 Geophysical Studies A geophysical survey utilizing the terrain conductivity technique will be performed at the site to aid in characterizing the hydrologic regime. This technique has been utilized successfully in locating subsurfce plumes of many different substances, including I hydrocarbons and metals in landfill leachate. Measurements will be taken at various j locations around the site to determine expected ranges of background or upgradient conductivity. Measurements will be taken across the dump site to identify anomalous conductivity distributions that may indicate buried metallic objects such as drums. The direction of ground -water flow is suspected to be in the northwest direction. Measurements wi-:l be taken at each one of the sides of +;ie filled area to attempt to identify the presence and direction of movement of any existing plumes of contaminated ground water leaving the site and the quality of ground water flowing into the landfill area. Both the Geonics EM -31 and EM -34 conductivity meters will be used to perform the survey. It is estimated that a two person team will require 4 days including travel time, to perform the conductivity survey, with readings taken for exploration depths of 8 and 46 feet at each measurement station. The data will be plotted on maps and contoured. These contour maps will provide the basis for defining the exact location of borings and ground -water monitoring wells. . 6.2.3 Monitoring Wells i 6.2.3.1 Installation. Monitoring wells will provide data pertinent to the chemistry, the stratigraphy and the ground -water regime at the site. It is recommended that 4 monitoring wells be installed at the approximate locations shown in Figure 2. Final well locations will be determined after the conductivity survey is completed. One well (MW -1) will be installed at a presumed upgradient location, on the southeast side of the site. This well will provide background data on the ground water flowing into the area. Wells MW -2 and MW -3 will be installed at d'owngradient !ocations and will provide water quality information on ground water leaving the site. E281.6/227B 6-2 a BORROW PIT AREA C.109 ,\r, ACTIVE LANDFILL AR SEPTIC LAGOONS OLD LANDFILL AREA COVERED WITH VEGETATION STORAGE OBUILDING LEGEND ®PROPOSED MONITORING WELL GUARD SHACK +* GATE FENCE OLLECTION ENTER A4�provwd LOCATION PLAN ONME hepredto, NEI fORKSTATE FOR PROPOSED PHASE 11 INVESTIGATION ,4. 'DEPARTMENT OF Ell RONMENTAL CONSERVATION SOUTHOLD LANDFILL SITE V....... m Y Wolf Road. Albign NewVoti, 12233 PIrosled t),V . . . . . . . . nry G Wheml. Comm,",one, WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS. G EOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS g �l g g 0.1 Dv,&.on of Solid rand Hazardous Vimic NEW YORK. NEW YORK Nor-i,n H. Nos*nchck. P.E. R 8Y BTD SCALE: NONE PROD NO. 82C , 4!5 4 n83 b_ YORK Daecto, LR DATE- 20 MAR 1985 FIG NO, 2 All monitoring wells will be installed so as to sample the upper 10 feet of ground water. The ground -water table in the vicinity of the site varies between 42 and 50 feet below the ground surface. It is estimated that total well depth will average 56 feet for all monitoring wells installed at the site. Borings will be advanced through overburden by 4 -inch I.D. hollow -stem augers or driven casing. Split -spoon samples will be obtained at 5 foot intervals. Blow counts will be recorded during each sampling. Soil samples will be classified in the field by a hydrogeologist using the Unified Soil Classification system. Selected samples will be ;-nt to our geotechnical laboratory for grain -size analysis and Atterberg tests and soil - moisture determinations. Two samples from each newly installed well are expected to be collected for analysis. To maximize information on any volatile organic contaminants, headspace surveys will be conducted on soil samples using a portable HNU meter, Model PI 101. These data will be used to evaluate relative concentrations of organic contaminants in various stratigraphic horizons. Slotted 2 -inch I.D. PVC well screen will be installed over 10 -foot intervals in each overburden well, with a riser casing of flush joint, threaded, 2 -inch I.D. PVC pipe. -� Risers will extend at least 3 feet above the ground surface to prevent contamination by surface -water flooding. A gravel pack will be completed to approximately 2 feet above the top of the screen, where a [-foot bentonite seal will be emplaced. To further assure that water samples will be representative of the screened interval, the remaining annular space will be grouted, and a protective steel casing will be installed. After installation, any wells completed in overburden will be developed by pumping, to remove any fine-grained material. It is estimated that 15 workings days will be required to perform inspection during the drilling, well installation operations, and surveying well elevations, headspace analysis of soil samples, slug -type permeability testing in each well and plotting data. y 6.2.3.2 Water Elevations. Ground -water depths will be measured at the time of well development and again at the time of sampling. Relative well elevations will be E281.6/227B 6-3 urveyed by WCCI personnel or subcontractor. Water -level elevations will be plotted nd used to develop contours of the ground -water table at the site. Based on this lap, the direction(s) of ground -water flow will be derived. Flow and gradient data will constitute fundamental input in quantifying site unditions and will be assessed together with the plume geometries inferred from cophysical survey data. 6.2.3.3 Aquifer Testing. "Slug" -type permeability tests will be conducted in each ewly installed well to evaluate the—permeability of materials spanning the screened iterval. The method is a rapid means by which the in-situ permeability in the nmediate vicinity of a monitoring well can be approximated. The test does not involve ,)roping of potentially contaminated water and results generally suffice for ground -water ow analysis. 6.2.4 Sampling and Analysis Plan 6.2.4.1 General Plan. The site-specific Quality Assurance/Quality Control )A/QC) Plan will be developed by WCCI and approved by the NYSDEC prior to :)mmencement of work. 6.2.4.2 Sampling Parameters. The laboratory analyses will focus on chemical :reening techniques to determine the type and range of concentration and the migration contaminants in ground water. The specific types of contaminants are unknown, but are suspected to include metals, volatile organics, pesticides and herbicides. The full prority pollutant analysis will be performed on one downgradient well sample, on one upgradient well sample, on one soil sample and on one leachate sample. The remaining samples will be analyzed for priority pollutant metals, volatile organics and water quality parameters. Samples will be collected from ground water,. soils and leachate. Sample types and chemical parameters are summarized in Table 2. 6.2.4.3 Sampling Locations. One water sample and one soil sample from each of the four ground -water monitoring wells will be analyzed. Results from each pair E281.6/227B 6-4 Table 2. PROPOSED CHEMICAL ANALYSES AT SOUTHOLD LANDFILL SITE Sample Type Ground Water Soil ! eachate Air ANALYSES X X Remarks One sample Full 4 wells. Priority Volatile Water Pollutant Metals Organics Qualityl Analysis2 X X X X X X x X X Remarks One sample at each of 4 wells. One sample from unsaturated zone at each of 4 wells. One sample only. Upwind and downwind locations using OVA or HNU. I Water Quality Parameters: TOC, Chloride, Color, Odor, Sulfate, TDS, Conductivity, pH. 2 Two ground water samples, one upgradient and one downgradient. One soil sample and one leachate sample. E281.7/22713 anal ses will be compared to evaluate any downard migration of contaminants through of Y -- ;oil. Ground -water analysis will be evaluated in terms of other hydrogeol°'o evaluate the presence, distribution, and migration directions of any ground -water contamination. Surface water samples will not be collected since the closest surface water is approximately 1.1 miles from the site. les will be analyzed using an HN or an Organic Vapor Analyzer (OVA) " Air sam p This survey at upwind and downwind locations. the site. willbein provide information from n,'11t concentrations of volatile organics, if any, that are g is estimated that 4 person -days will be required to collect all required ground water and leachate samples. AND SAFETY PLAN 6.3 HEALTH Health and safety apparel and equipment are expected to be required during the major field activities initial site investigation, geophysical studies, of drilling Cost g the monitoring -well installation and water sampling. For the purpose investigation, Level D protection is assumed in each case. The health and safety YSDEC 9 precautions and procedures actually employed will conform to the generalized Health and Safety Plan, and will be developed by WCCI on a site basis. Should protective levels higher than Level D be requwill be in ired for any activity, costhe NYSDEC accordance with the unit costs indicated in the attachment supplied to April 1985. 6.4 REPORT PREPARATION Report preparation will involve analysis of the data as well as preparation of the text. Included in this task are the compilation and organization of the ata, editing of boring logs, reduction- of hydrologic data, preparation of graphicalrepresentations, analysis and calculations, updating the HRS score for the site and report reproduction. E281.6/22713 6-5 Y in addition, remedial concepts will be developed along with order -of -magnitude remedial :osts. 6.5 COST ESTIMATE Costs for Phase II work were developed based on NYSDEC Audit and Control (,-uidelines, using assumptions described in WCCI's cost propsoal submitted to NYSDEC t)n October 29, 1982, subsequent contract D000452 dated March 31, 1983, and the generic work plan developed by NYSDEC. Costs have been grouped by task, and estimates are presented in Table 2. Lump su -,- cost arrangements will be provided for Tasks I, 2, 3, 6 and 7. For Tasks 4 and 5, Drilling/Well Installation and Sampling and "analysis respectively, lump sum cost arrangements will be provided with the exception of drilling and well installation subcontracted costs, and chemical analytical laboratory subcontracted costs. Analytical costs include trip and field blanks, spike and replicate samples and shuttle costs as required by the NYSDEC QA/QC Laboratory Protocol. The subcontracted cost items will be billed at cost plus five percent. Any activity that involves work or levels of effort beyond the scope of this work plan will be billed in accordance with the unit rates indicated in the attachment provided dated April 1985. E281.6/22713 6-6 TABLE 3 (1) Level D protection assumed. (2) Includes direct project office costs, reproduction and postage. am ESTIMATED COSTS FOR PHASE II INVESTIGATIJI, SOUTHOLD LANDrILL ♦+♦wr•rriwwwwr++w•rrr+rwi•a•}rrwwrrwra•war•irraif+ar•a+ri•ww+•rw++wwrw+wwrwirwair+iwra+iwrww♦rrarwtrwrwwwat►�,t,wrwawaww•s+aaarw+ori+a•+wwi•raawww+awa+wait+aaa ♦ + LABOR + OTHER DIAEGI' CUSTS + • { wain+♦fwri+++iAR+arrwwwAriwir4k++riwiraw•+w++wAr+#irr+wr++ir+lwr++wwira++f+rr+wrf rf of wfrr+++re rr+#rrw ar•w+•N+r++rrwrr•rirf w+•{ { • Direct Overhead Total Consul- Sub -Con- Travel i Health i SDoclal Special Sample Office r • w TASKS Hours Cost Cost Cost tants tractors Sunni%- Safety Ti•sting Equip- Shipment Services • TOTAL a w tence Gear i Ment (2) a • App. (1 ) a i riww►r♦w•+rwrrwwriaw+ri+rwiia++sssrsas+i:wa•w:rw+ifs}aaarwi•wrara+}wira}aw}}a}wwsrwiwwrirrw•{ia}aaw•aaw•}rraaararrwwaraaw*+rri.a+iw•@+wiwr•rr}a•aa}+aar+}warty w w { • 1. Work, Health i + + • Safety and r • • QA/QC Plans • 75 1365 1593 2978 0 0 0 200 r 3178 • ------ ` ----------------------------------------------------------------------.-.---------------------.-----------.---------------------------------------- • 2. Preliminary ° • } s Investtpations r w • and Site Visit `----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24 441 507 946 134 140 275 0 i 1497 • ------ a + 3. Geophysical { } • Studies 96 1753 2016 3769 536 560 2200 0 i 7065 + ` ------------------------------------------------ a --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------• • 4. Drilling/Wwll Drilling/Well . • w Installation 120 2220 2553 4773 10642 1248 840 1592 2280 250 0 + 21625 • `------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ r w • 5. Sampling and i • • Analysis `------------------•-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 70 1288 1481 2769 29960 402 420 1030 650 0 a ------------------ 35231 + ------ 6. Report 6. * • • Preparation `--------------------------------------- 152 2860 3289 6149 1300 0 0 0 1317 • - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------` 9166 • a • 7. Project • + i • @ Management 82 2043 2352 4397 634 0 0 400 a 5431 a • w � rwr••}erw+rawaw{a•rwaa{arwwwrrrwwifrrwawrasarawaaa{rwfawrr•fwawra•iarar+aaaiwaii{e}ww+riwarrraa+ararwara{•arrrrawww•wr{arrw•r+aaia+af{{{i wfawrw•raa•wa•ifr4� • TOTALS 619 11992 13791 25783 1500 40602 2954 1960 1592 5783 9" 2117 r 83194 a raraee•ewrawew+•riawriwrraiw++i++•ra+rrwwwf+w•irrrwawawr+rwwaa•}+raaarai}r+wwiww•ww r+i•iwrwiaariwww+wfaw+ww{wwwrr++4e{r+arair+aa+aa+ia+ia{aa+•+aww+r•+iw{ar • FEE 3867 75 2030 i 5973 a }wr:}+•+wwww•ra•r+arei}r••rw++}wr}}w+wia}ir+i+{aaw+iraiwei•aw+r*fr•••iiw{raaiwoee@+•wrwrraw+ai•a{•rrara}rrfiww{}}faararwa+r••rrawarwr•}iaiww•}}+a+r+}{raiw•+ w TOTAL i • w ESTIMATED COST 29651 1575 42632 2954 1960 1392 5785 900 2117 w 89166 o rw+w4•w•ra•fw{ff Oriia4ia•4{}aaar#ia i+r}oaf rf Orar}r{rra+ira•warfri@i{ii4rir+ri+wiwiiir+iari}rwrar+ir4wirwffwaawiifrfiawffwif}}ff 4iiaa@{+w4awawi}wrwiar+iaw+a4 (1) Level D protection assumed. (2) Includes direct project office costs, reproduction and postage. am In addition, remedial concepts will be developed along with order -of -magnitude remedial costs. �.5 COST ESTIMATE Costs for Phase II work were developed based on NYSDEC Audit and Control (,uidelines, using assumptions described in WCCI's cost propsoal submitted to NYSDEC on October 29, 1982, subsequent contract D000452 dated March 31, 1983, and the generic work plan developed by NYSDEC. Costs have been grouped by task, and estimates are presented in Table 2. Lump surn cost arrangements will be provided for casks I, 2, 3, 6 and 7. For Tasks 4 and 5, Drilling/Well Installation and Sampling and Analysis respectively, lump sum cost arrangements will be provided with the exception of drilling and well installation subcontracted costs, and chemical analytical laboratory subcontracted costs. Analytical costs include trip and field blanks, spike and replicate samples and shuttle costs as required by the NYSDEC QA/QC Laboratory Protocol. The subcontracted cost items will be billed at cost plus five percent. Any activity that involves work or levels of effort beyond the scope of this work plan will be billed in accordance with the unit rates indicated in the attachment provided dated April 1985. E281.6/227B 6-6 TABLE 3 (1) Level D protection assumed. (i) Includes direct project office costs, reproduction and postage. ESTIMATED COSTS FOR PHASE II INVESTIGATI]I- SOUTHOLD LANDrILL tla#•!#f•Rk►•#ill#►Rw►rf ••#7f A•R!#►f•/►RlRAR►wt/iwraRw►►kw►i!!•f►r}lwRfllRRwf►R►R►lRiwf wrra/f4w►•fiARwf/rRAs./#liRAwRR•RRerAir!/ww•Rriee♦}i•Rwe}•ager/wrwreeRf w• • • LABOR • OTHER DIRECT CUSTS • + • w#••##iaa•/aiwRRRwlwa#RR#atwa#Q#/i!•iiratlr##•iRRw##lAwilaRarr4walla#R►w#RwwRwf•Ra#►w/w#w/rrwwwAR#rw/a►w•riF•/ReRr•Rrer►RR4A►ra/• • # Direct Overhead Total Consul- Sub -Con- Travel C Health i Special Soecial Sample Office + a • TASKS Hours Cost Cost Cost tants tractors Subsis- Safety Twat ing Equip- Shipment Services-* TOTAL • • tence Gear i ment (2) • • R Apo. (I ) • • fi#tlf#laiffa•fRf AlRf•R►•!Af#RRlw••R♦RA#RAf a•/if►MRA•/•R#f tfR•f •wf/RRR//RAAAR/A4R••Af iiRA•iwfifwaR►//w#iw/a/ikaR4ewR•i}iiRa#i#a.weiRleli•iiaR►4►eair►ariRR9/►• w @ • • 1. Work, Health L. w ► + Safety and • • OA/OC Plans +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------w 75 1385 1593 2978 0 0 0 200 / 3178 ► • 2. Preliminary • • • Investigations w • • and Site Visit w----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------i 24 441 507 948 134 140 275 0 r 1497 a • • 3. Geophysical 4 R • # • Studies 96 1753 2016 3769 536 560 2200 0 • 7065 • +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•-------------------------------------------------R • 4. Drilling/Nell a • • Inat�llati)on , 120 2220 2553 4773 10642 1248 840 1592 2280 250 0 + 21625 • --------------------------------- -____--_.�ifsY---------------------------- -� ------- 1G- ---- -----------___-__-_--__-__-_-------------- A 5. Sampling and w Analysis #-------------------••--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------i 70 1288 1481 2769 29960 402 420 1030 650 0 • 35231 • • • 6. Report e • • • • Preparation ! 152 2860 3289 6149 1500 0 0 0 1517 • 9166 • • A • 7. Project • + / + w Management 82 2045 2352 4397 634 0 0 400 r 5431.} • e w/alall#AaraRwR►wirwawrri#•raRA►•ierww•rwirA/#Ati••ReiAAw•}!►w/riiwAa#awo►RarRwrr/a•frei//ARRaai•►ill►►/#•A•irRwwR#•aRwrr/•+wiweiwi•wr•RAitee+Ri/ie/e•/•/rewa • TOTALS 619 11992 13791 25783 1500 40602 2954 1960 1592 5785 9" 2117 w 83194 _ @@@@AAARAffrfref rierwAf•r•iRwrwr/e•wr•fwf ReirieRw4f4w•►ff►•ww►iwi@/•RR4i/Off RR►rf Rrr♦eRwrrwAfrieweireRww#wlRiewr//•west Rf RewwwewwewrrRwwwerRwi•fiilrifa/wiw• • FEE 3867 75 2030 • 5973 r ♦•aiffw}/AfQewfwf@i RrR4f ifaRf wf kwrrawiwrweifwr/f♦AQ•#ewfii•rA•Rrf w►•wwRrffaa4RA@@@eetiaRriwirwrrf R•R•r•/eat Rirrwf iRf•f Rrriwww•wwRewwwariwRwrRwRrwwwiReei/if♦ w TOTAL } • • ESTIMATED COST 29651 1575 42632 2954 1960 1592 5785 900 2117 + 89166 a iwr/aeiill•e/eia•aeAw•rw•/•iriwrwr•@art►•AwreAe►iaiwti/wire e•AAwrrwiRlr/ieraiiiRrA+/•♦iRwRriRRRre►aar►RR4►►aitae/w/riawr•Aae♦yewrwwe+wewwe#RwrRweeiiRiwerRw (1) Level D protection assumed. (i) Includes direct project office costs, reproduction and postage. xipueddy REFERENCES Donnelly Marketing, 1984, American Profile Information Retrieval Sytem, based on 1980 Census data, Stamford, CT., (LOCATION: WCCI Files). Analyses Performed on Samples Collected During Energy Resources Company, Inc., 1981, 1981. Summar of the Hydrologic Situation on Long Franke, O.L. and N.E. McClymonds, 1972, Y Island, New York, as a Guide to Water-ManoagemDent'ALOCATIO.,, WC IoF les)! Survey Professional Paper 627-F, Washington, Jensen, H.M. and Soren, Julian, 1974, Hydrogeology of. Suffolk County, Long Island, New York, U.S. Geological Survey, Hydrologic Investigations Atlas HA -501, Washington, D.C. (LOCATION: WCCI Miller, Jeff, 1983, The Suffolk Times: Methane Vents Seen Effective, (LOCATION: WCCI Files). National Fire Protection Association, Inc., (NFPA), 1975, Hazardous Chemical Data, Boston, MA., (LOCATION: WCCI Files). 1984, Agricultural District Maps, Division NYS Department ff?9ri�Lure and OCATION MarkNYSDA&M, Albany Files). of Rural Aa , New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Solid Waste t 1979-1980, Facility Inspection Reports, (LOCATION: WCCI Files). Managemen , Csery New York State Department of Environmental ion I F les)ation, 1984a, Well Permits - Region I, (LOCATION: NYSDEC Reg State De artment of Environmental Conservation, 1984b, Listings and Maps New York P Division of Fish and Wildlife, Significant of Significant Habitats in Suffolk County, Habitats Unit, (LOCATION: NYSDEC/Albany .Files). Wetlands in Nassau New York State Department jnformation transmittedf Environmental rby'Mike 98scina, Superfund Sites F ` and Suffolk Co a' Region I, (LOCATION: WCCI Files). NYS Department of Health, 1982, NYS Atlas of Community Water System Sources. " r 1984, Files of Suffolk County Historical Sites Listed on NYS Parks and Recreation, ivision for Historic Preservation, (LOCATION: State and Federal Registers, D NYSP&R/Albany Files). Sax, N.l., 1979, Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, Van Nostrand Reinhold " Company, New York, (LOCATION: WCCI Files). E281.8/227B I yuf folk County Department of Health Services, 1980, Memorandum to James C. Maloney from Steven Kramer, Re: Landfilling of oil - soaked earth, (LOCATION: WCCI Files). ;uffolk County Department of Health Services, 1981, Memorandum to Aldo Andreoli from Joseph H. Baier, Re: Southold Incinerator Proposal, (LOCATION: WCCI Files). Suffolk County Department of Health Services, 1982, Memorandum to Aldo Andreoli from James C. Maloney, Re: Southold Town Landfill, (LOCATION: WCCI Files). Suffolk County Department of Health Services, 1984 Table sent by Richard Meyer to C. Matta of WCCI, Re: Water Supply Systems General Information 1982, (LOCATION: WCCI Files). USEPA, 1982, Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Site Ranking System, A User's Manual, Washington, D.C., (LOCATION: WCCI Files). USEPA, 1982, Supplemental Instructions for the Hazard Ranking System, Washington, D.C., (LOCATION: WCCI Files). USGS; 1956, Southold and Mattituck Hills, NY., 7.5 Minute Quadrangles, (LOCATION: WCCI Files). ;'loodward-Clyde Consultants, Inc., 1984, Site Inspection Conducted by David Muscalo, Sr. Staff Geologist, on December 18, 1984, (LOCATION: WCCI Files). i' E281.8/22713 2 Appendix 6 Name of Site: -q O &&-r H t -f 0 Ll L-, County: S"rF O L -K Address: N1) r2X H RO ►i- D r u. r944 C C_, tF 1 135 Inspector: D orJ % p 01 u S CA - ►-D Time and Date of Inspection: /:00 d rpt Weather Conditions: Su NN Y k) p 2 rn SITE Di=SCRIPTION oy;,.e o. Site: A Surface Impoundment —ZB Piles C Drums Above Ground D Tank Above Ground E F Tank Below Ground Landfill G Landfarm H Open Dump I Other Area of Site: 4 1 n C R�-'.S General Description: 2. Buildings on Site? 0/no If yes, describe: &u fga-D G i+gLK C V t-.l_CCT ICN C• V�NYMQ 5TC2 MA -C- E- Q l -D G. 7 Page 2 of 13 1. niame(s): J A rr, V--, Q , SON i T-A--tcvAJ 2. Position(s): S 1aPf2 p - v oso oy F 1,- FOR F -MA N 3. Telephone Number: Ls- -2.3 q — 76 &5- 4. dame of Current Owner of Site: -Tow So "-T H ko c ,1J 5. Address of Current Owner of Site: /V 0 CST !A 12D, C, UT14n G ; t V— , lu y )1 9 3LS 6. Time Period Site Was Used for Hazardous Waste Disposal: 19-51 To PP -N ' , 19 1, site Active Inactive at present? Past Sampling Activities: it Ground W Surface Water Soil Remedial Action: Pro 0 In Progress Status of Legal Action: State Under Design Completed Federal None Permits Issued: Federal Local Government SPDES S LA P Fu i -K C,0 "tv T Solid Waste Mined Land Wetlands Other IL V4TERVIEW RECORD (continued) Waste Characteristics: fi Other Information: (site history, operator information, generator/transporter information, past response activities, legal actions, hazardous incidents, other information). 6c� a"t " UL SURFACE WATER 1• Is there identifiable leachate? es no If yes, describe: 2. Is site competely surrounded by higher ground: yes/'uncertain from field observations 3. Appropriate distance to nearest observed downgradient body of Surface water; Co 0 0 o Description: Use: 4• Average slope of site:3% 3-5% Page 4 of 13 5-8% >8% S• On site ponding? Cy�/no If yes, describe: ,,� 6• Average slope of terraine between site and nearest observed down slope surface water body: (:3 5-8% 3-5% 8% 7• In an area of flood plain? yes L -j Page 5 of 13 , :ja SURFACE WATER (continued) Damage to floral fauna from surface water? yes 0 If yes, describe: C*1� . 1. Surface Features (general topography, paving, structures, etc.): CROLg,V WATER On site wells? ye's none observed If yes: number�i" location description Observations concerning ground water Observations concerning stratigraphy k , Damage to flora/fauna from ground water? yes/r6 If yes, describe. Page h of 13 Page 7 of 13 AIR Evidence of air contaminants emitted from site: Rationale for attributing the contaminants to the site: Q V pr 1. 2. 3. 4. 7. 8. r9. Page 8of13 Ian' t �3 e9 y.; Distance to nearest observed off-site building 3 J U Distance to nearest observed residence C 0 0,0 Estimated number of households within a radius of 1/4 mile Distance to nearest observed commercial/industrial land usetir�. Description: Distance to nearest observed agricultural lands Description:iti,�.-� Observed historic landmark sites? �/no C C vC-h+Of-u`e w' $�vr! lC:oti 1f yes, describe, give approximate distance: 3 Mlc� 0,0 Observed park/open space area? yes If yes, describe, give approximate distance: Observed wetlands or low-lying area? yes/(f) If yes, describe, give approximate distance and area in acres: Observed critical habitat or wildlife refuge? yes�o If yes, describe, give approximate distance: IQ General description of use of adjacent lands. �Wt_rd 7 Page 9 of 13 yUL WASTE c3-�ARp+CTERISTICS Physical State of Waste Comments solid, stable solid, unstable AAA powder, fines v1 sludge is slurry liqu id gas ot: er 1 2. Estimated quantity of waste:. I( e) ,0d p�Jzc Ills Si 1II Estimated quantity of waste that appears fully contained! 4. Gdors? �/no If yes, describe: Observations concerning suspected waste materials YID. wASTE COTTAII*+£NT =- 1. 2. 3. zA 5. 6 observed soil/rock material underlying site: c.L."�j -4, -bv-� 'e- i -�t tur,Wartificial/unknown Diversion system? yes Description/condition: Leachate collection system? yes Description/condition: Page 10 of 13 permeability: low/ o ett rate igh Is there diking? yes , If yes, is it sound/unsound? W If diking exists, does it have adequate freeboard? yes/(n If site has containers (i.e., 55 -gallon drums): are they sealed and in sound condition or leaking? �7 S ad �%Zd '• If waste is in piles, a. Are piles ncovered? b. Is waste stabilized unstabili ed. 8• If waste is in a landfill: Is there potential for ponding on surface of landfill? b: Is there potential for erosion?`' c. Is there refuse visible at surface? d. If covered, Is the cover seeded/vegetational cover? P. -O WASTE CCNTARAAENT (continued) Damage to flora/fauna from direct contact? yesno If yes, describe: Security - 24-hour surveillance - no barriers security gu 0�p - complete barrier - incomplete barrier Comments concerning waste containment: - controlled entry =signsposted Page 11 of 13 4i Page 12 of 13 D(. SITE NVESTIGATION FEASIBILITY J. Accessible to vehicles?0 6S If no, why: 2.. Accessible to drill rig? no If no, why: 3. (dearest drilling water source; 4. Accessible to backhoe:/no If no, why 5. Geophysical Surveys: Accessible: (Y/no Overhead interference J71 Surface interference Subsurface Interference 6. Accessibility of adjacent off-site lands: Comments Page 13 of 13 SKETCHES, PHOT"PA145 N A2V�rR 4 t A -C c:::) LL L�RF S1cypiNS I M�XTwpt ACT�O� �[�J WoC� P, ` d t.P t mow rc of - Co V EQC 0 w� rpt oN scnco C F Y NAY l� p 440 7 0 c 6 F Proximity of Active Agricultural land and Prime Farmland LO Can( date !:.active lazardot.is Wa!,te Site;; T1_d) /c/ C(/� // 4, C Site No. Sheet No. #1* #2** Commencs 57 :0 No Yes Prime farmland within 2 but not I mile 3 70 $r Yes Yes Prime farmland within 3/4 mile 5 8 & 17 Yes Yes Active prime farmland in Suffolk County Agri- cultural District #1 adjacent to site 6 40 No No? Mount Sinai area to N/E (Sheet 40 ) and area to east should be investigated - farmland is at the 2 mile range 8 64 & 65 ;jF_ No No 12 54 Yes Yes Nursery stock 700 ft. south; 40 acre vegetable farm is SW ab,,ut 1.5 miles; within mile to the north 16 51 Yes Yes 30 acre vegetable farm to the west; areas to the' east 17 17 Yes Yes All farmland prime; horse farm adjacent to site to the west; also farmland within 3/4 mile to the 18North 47 and Northeast Yes Yes Prime farmland within 1.5 miles; vegetable farm within a mile at North Sea 23 � Yes Yes Active agricultural land within 1/4 mile, active prime farmland within 1/2 mile - site is adjacent 24 to Rensselaer Count l Agricultural District #7 Yes Yes Active primefarmland within� -1/4mile; site is ad- jacent to Rensselaer County Agricultural District *Distance to **Distance agricultural land in production within past #3. 5 years, if 1 mile or less. to 9tSoil prime agricultural land in production within past 5 years, if -2 miles or less. survey information of Suffolk County- USDA -SCS in cooperation with Cornell Agricultural Experiment Station issued 4/75-- obtained during telephone conversations with Stabilization and Conservation Service staff. Suffolk County SWCD, and County USDA, Agricultural it - Not Applicable; soil survey mapping completed -awaiting conversation with the USDA -SCS, District publication --information obtained during telephone Conservationist with the Rensselaer County SWCD. January 1985 4 4.1 a,.: -`re„ 11.2 11.3 RING1 0.30 RINUI 1.00 HILL(y)C, MILE (,p 0 1143 0 1/ 0�)/ / 11.4 RZNGJ 2.00 MXL.F ( S 2177, 147 11.5 RINU; 4.00 MILE(S) 8792 2- 338 5 AREA: 12 SITE -17 NUMBER 12.1 DESCRIPTION RIND: 0.23 MILE(S) POPULATION 0 H(JUSLHULIIS 12.2 RINGI 0.30 MILE(S) 890 0 328 12.3 RING: 1,00 MILE(S) 1769 657 go 12*4 RING: 2s00 MILE(S) 43131596 12,3 RINUI 4.00 MIl..E(S) Z999 3012 AREA: 13 SITE -111 NUMBER DESCRIPTION POPULATIUN HOUSEHOLDS 13.1 RINUI 0.25 MILE(S) 0 13.2 RING: 0,30 MILE(S) 1909 699 13.3 RINUI 1.00 MILE(S) 1909 699 0 s 13.4 RIN01 2.00 MILE(S) 2553 935 13.5 RINUI 4.00 MILES) Y928 iyo;,. 72 `2 - AREA: 14 SITE -21 NUMM DESCRIPTION POPULATION HOUSEHOL I'S 1411 RINUI 0.23 MILE(S) 315 96 r 1402 RINGI 0#50 MILE(S) 7154 2321 14.3 RING: 1.00 MILE(S) 59964 21029 14.4 RING: 2.00 MILE(S) 226125 06387 14,5 RINUI 4o00 MILE(S) 1011543 101039 ,7 Yo AREA: 15 SITE -24 NUMBER DESCRIPTION POPULATION HOUSLHOLDS 15.1 RINGI 0.25 MILE(9) 0 �f-9 15.2 RINGI 0.30 MILE(S) 0 0 15.3 RIN131 loOO MILE(g) 0 0 15.4 15.5 RING: 2.00 MILE(S) 0 0 02 y R I No: 4.00 MIL.E(S> 1218 11.7 16.03.28 >Iogout 2967.18 ARU'Sy .26 CONNECT HRS LOGGED OFF AT 16.06.01 ON 28DEC84 4 rKI 0 r if f rJL4 f � : / ,.? -/V -k5. 4. o I-rl7 Ali, -? bey - in aCi C,2 C. 's 1131,gy I- JE A) Pha se -g-0 /* der 5L t4 -_177_11- ._-i�aglar_ f�i•ll _ �m. - ,�_ _ So�� . F /V h11- /V.01-7 Z6 A/cy<_ ?r7 CO -07 7L /Vf- pe. 02 of 2. r lD Alone, None— Ale ne, Ald e? e, Al 7 Al Av 0:5 G C/. Lo, a) la,*, al s r� York State DupF_rtment of Fnvironmontal Consew-flan i l r7ing 40 ate U»iversity of New York Brook, NY 11794 751-7900 Henry G. William: Commissloner May 9, 1981 MAY 13 1,693 'r. Wi3liam PP11 TII, Suner,t7isor SUFFOLKCOURlY '1'rlwn of Southold JOB NO• (,;,ithol d, NY 11971 RE: LANDFTLL ',ear Supervisor Pell: On Tuesday, May 26, the Solid 1+7ante Unit met with Southold Councilman -r:nk Murphy, Highway Superi^tendent Ray Dean and Harold Dombeck of H2M Cor -ora on. ThF main element of the disc»ssion was that the landfill was in poor con'?ition ,id immediate action was needed to resolve the problems of ponding, gas migration, :11covered refuse, -)norganized dumping and blowing paper. ThF pr -posed septage composting project and the construction of a resident 4101_cping transfer station were reviewed. These projects will necessitate more !anrower and equipment. We requested a methane monitoring system and more down gradient groundwater �:clls. If the Town expands its filling operations to the south or to the new area, a double liner and leachate collection system will be required. The feasibility Of extending the fill vertically prior to capping to avoid the liner issue was Yo,. c'•i scussed, Enclosed iG an outline detailing the elements of our discussion. We feel the Board must make a strong commitment to sound landfilling practices = and plan for the future considering the increasing population of the Town. The co'^mitment should include an adequate and competent work force to control site a -cess a -;d to operate the site well on a daily basis to eliminate crash programs. �r If we may Le of any assistance by speaking to the Board, we will be ;lad to do SO. Z'^� Henry G. William: Commissloner May 9, 1981 MAY 13 1,693 'r. Wi3liam PP11 TII, Suner,t7isor SUFFOLKCOURlY '1'rlwn of Southold JOB NO• (,;,ithol d, NY 11971 RE: LANDFTLL ',ear Supervisor Pell: On Tuesday, May 26, the Solid 1+7ante Unit met with Southold Councilman -r:nk Murphy, Highway Superi^tendent Ray Dean and Harold Dombeck of H2M Cor -ora on. ThF main element of the disc»ssion was that the landfill was in poor con'?ition ,id immediate action was needed to resolve the problems of ponding, gas migration, :11covered refuse, -)norganized dumping and blowing paper. ThF pr -posed septage composting project and the construction of a resident 4101_cping transfer station were reviewed. These projects will necessitate more !anrower and equipment. We requested a methane monitoring system and more down gradient groundwater �:clls. If the Town expands its filling operations to the south or to the new area, a double liner and leachate collection system will be required. The feasibility Of extending the fill vertically prior to capping to avoid the liner issue was Yo,. c'•i scussed, Enclosed iG an outline detailing the elements of our discussion. We feel the Board must make a strong commitment to sound landfilling practices = and plan for the future considering the increasing population of the Town. The co'^mitment should include an adequate and competent work force to control site a -cess a -;d to operate the site well on a daily basis to eliminate crash programs. �r If we may Le of any assistance by speaking to the Board, we will be ;lad to do SO. ] l;:,m '.'rel) 11T, sktper� mor 9, 1983 Two The landfill will be routinely inspected by this office and Suffolk Health. 1f •onditions remain as they are,. we will initiate legal action. Thank you for your cooperation. HH:ebp Eno. cc: H. Berge_' A. Machlin J. Maloney R. Dean Very truly yours, L JA24E-S H. HETL, P.E. Regional Solid waste Engineer 0 MI e TOMq OF SOUTHOLD T,ANDFILL PIAN !;�ediately: Daily cover of refuse Clean up blowing papers Grade area to reduce ponding Remove rubble, scrap metal, shells, excess paper bales from site Complete the methane venting trench on the west and south perimeter '.ssign additional equipment/personnel to the landfill July imple gr^undwater monitoring wells '-�aust 1: Tnstall three landfill gas monitoring probe clusters. Each cl?ster shall have three sampling points at varying depths. Two clusters shall be nn west side of -ite between venting trench and property line. One cluster shall be on south side between venting trench and the property line. The mown shall institute a monthly program of monitoring gas probes for % methane. 'Phe Town shall install. downgradient from the landfill beyond the existing monitoring ,yells a three well groundwater monitoring well cluster or other acceptable ground - .iter anslyTis pro -,ram. Au ,ust 31: T';e Town shall have the septage composting project in operation. The Town shall submit a plan indicating landfilling operations for the subsequent three year period. Any expansion of the landfill to the southeast in the current excavation area or expansion into adjacent properties will require the installation of a double liner and leachate collection system. t='l Se^tember 30: The T-:wn shall commerce final gradin.;, capping and closure as per the Town plan. NYSDEC shall provide technical assistance to the Town in the evaluation of the use of composted septage as part of the final capping material. !pow York Stat© Department of Environmental Conservation :.,i]ding 40 = ,te University of New York :;tuny Brook, New York 11794 Mr. William Pell III, Town of Southold Town Ha !lain Road Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Supervisor Pell: saloner January 31, 198 FEB 3 incl . A Supervisor SUEFOIK C"' Re: LANDFILL In conjunction with an inspection of the landfill (January 24, 1983), we have reviewed the Part 360 Compliance Report prepared for the Town by H2M Corporation (June 1981). We request the following information: 1. METHANE MONITORING Location and depth of existing probes, type of monitoring equipment and monitoring data. 2. GROUNDWATER MONITORING Location and depth of wells installed following the compliance report and monitoring data since June 1981. 3. CAPPING The inspection indicated no progress in shaping the fill to achieve the design grades as shown on.the H214 site plan of March 1981. Final capping as per Part'36O will be required. 4. LINER The unlined portion of the excavation should be brought to a bottom grade and lined as per the regional policy. The inspection indicated large amounts of uncovered refuse, blowing paper and debris around the employees shed. We would be•glad-to meet with you or Superintendent Dean to discuss the status of the operation. _r. Very truly yours, ' , /-•1 rte, �� JAMES H: HEIL Regional Solid Waste Engineer JHH:ebp CC: A. Machlin T. Sanford J. Maloney et:_. r i Robert F. Flacke saloner January 31, 198 FEB 3 incl . A Supervisor SUEFOIK C"' Re: LANDFILL In conjunction with an inspection of the landfill (January 24, 1983), we have reviewed the Part 360 Compliance Report prepared for the Town by H2M Corporation (June 1981). We request the following information: 1. METHANE MONITORING Location and depth of existing probes, type of monitoring equipment and monitoring data. 2. GROUNDWATER MONITORING Location and depth of wells installed following the compliance report and monitoring data since June 1981. 3. CAPPING The inspection indicated no progress in shaping the fill to achieve the design grades as shown on.the H214 site plan of March 1981. Final capping as per Part'36O will be required. 4. LINER The unlined portion of the excavation should be brought to a bottom grade and lined as per the regional policy. The inspection indicated large amounts of uncovered refuse, blowing paper and debris around the employees shed. We would be•glad-to meet with you or Superintendent Dean to discuss the status of the operation. _r. Very truly yours, ' , /-•1 rte, �� JAMES H: HEIL Regional Solid Waste Engineer JHH:ebp CC: A. Machlin T. Sanford J. Maloney et:_. IS e r� NO East.ffjy��anon o 25 5� _. � - /TE :41� ��_- �.^, l/ 7G leo �a -{I� /e- t fACN slA B yr� Ng6tr • 3 O.y_7 -: 12 % LA,HO --a IS ion IilpmQ He19hts � .• • Gu[h01 `S eft Is.. �- �con,c 12- S 1 [ 7r./s/an re •. Bad ,ew S A D 7. - — Cedar r`*~ 20 - •4 -- cL Nassau F S - : _ anus - Orth Mme° q '���.,2 ' s eeves Park _ _ Cutchogue. atiquckJ_ -- _, _ L/ /!e bpq kIT/p �q ° /r WI[O Al I� - �_ o - AUTneW \ - Nassau P Pe nt Ba i - Ef/ipF Point 9 - �J 1SP n YCA' Suffolk ��q/YEBNfAP l c n!c ,• _ - ar bor b A-E 33 s, F _. 6 Q L/ ' 25 JameSppR . /s/and o BQ orae 2B 28 4T _ ogue ! a�.sesr! _ rENCFIbiaT - C� aAnpgAt i -' � 11A Fre Free f 2F ° �� ea/ South tpuFEgE! YCE EAs 28 / r4MPTON tON4' - 56 T Ja conic B w� M1 i Sg it ]S.•' _ ron;- - ,- No Rh Sea,Fast 2: 3 28 - S ,- _ Fland .-.,_` ers - ` Ham a,nsc Ham 3 nd a o� ; mPton rgico - _ � T N 14 13 66 ' Ns Tuck Park Pton - 2426 N _ _ Tond f ' sag k / prVWfl! - p Ao n4c k co 0 rrd , 13 UFFplp .O � .r -� , r 4 w ti+di`g ` T SOuih -�-� A'CO 28 �amd d r S`�St r, /Shin„ - a n ecock meta 'I o28 1pN6 v 'z P'", c:A.,Pomquogue RES ; P sPeonk Quio f� eDA �s(��gUe --,_- -•_�- ------ so T g�ih Fg t�\ Bea 4r, s r L'�✓r�mu.��fz� (Vallis ,� S� s>�� •JSo��«s /9,y Urr7�. SCALE 1:250,000 �— C 5 MILES NORTH SUFFOLK COUNTY q COMMUNITY WATER SYSTEM Vsarupal Community e POPULATION :?•:von Water Corporation. . . . . . . 1150. 25812 . rjrentwood Water District. • 1916 :Iridgehampton Water Company. • • ' 580. notain Kidd Water Company. 50. grab Meadow Beach. . • • i:ulr-oss Corporation (Culross Beach). :0 [)('ring Harbor Vi I Iage. , • • • ' • • 30 11330. .0 uix Hills Water District. . . . . East Farmingdale Water District. . . 7850. I:shers Island Water Works Corporation. • • • - reenlawn Water District. . . . . . eenport Village. i+ampton Bays Water District. . . . t,iwthorne - Maple Civic •association. • • • • • • Herod Point Association. . . . . . 'inrth Shores Water Company. . . . r?cean Beach Village. . . . . . . . 11 -eves Beach Water Company. . . ;�rverhead Water District- 11nanoke Water Corporation. . . . - ;altaire Village. . . . . . . . . ,cott's Beach Water Company. . �h'eIter Island Heights Association ,•Ir rley Water Works. . thn rewood Water Corporation. . . . joundview Association. ;truth Huntington Water District. . 5,rffolk County Water Authority. . sinrhi I I Water Corporation. " wnn Lake Water Corporation. . . . I r, r ra ce-on- the -Sound . . . . . '•+oodbury Triangle Corporation. . . Oltr ee : V615 1 -t/a s of L'�v✓Ylmu.nr� ruatLz� SOURCE ��5� SQu/CSS ll�vZ C'd am7f . Weds Wells Wells Wells Wells Wells Wells Wells Wells .250. . .Barlow, Middle Farms and Treasure Ponds, Wells 40000. . .Wells 6851- . .Wells 9500. . .Wells 50. 80. .5000. 155. 650. .9300. ,201, .35. .342. 498. 3400. .10000. 236. 51260. .900000. 3959. 1485• 400. .800. .Wells ,Wells ,Wells Wells wells Wells Wells Wells Wells Wells Wells Wells Wells Wells Wells Wells Wells wells Wells _. Bon Municipal Community _ 3 Aquebogtre Mobile Home Court. . . . 120 . . We I I s lI- Brookhaven National Labs. . . . . . .3373. . .Wells - 15 Calverton Hills Owners Association. . • • 897 Wells rq_ 36 Cedar Lodge Nursing Home. . . . . - 100 . •Wells 17 central Islip Psychiatric Center. . .4525- . .Wells -" 18 Crest Hall Health Related Facility. . . . . . . . . 120. . . Wei ls r 39 Fast Quogue Mobile Estates. . 160. . .Wells 40 Good Samaritan Hospital. . . . . . . . NA. . .Wells e 41 r,reis Mobile Park. . . . . . . . . . 70. .Wells y� 42 Hampton Gateway Apartments.304. Wells 41 Kings Park Psychiatric Center. 3100. .Wells - 44 Knox School. . . . . NA. . ,Wells 45 lake Hurst Lodge Adult Home. . 5 7. . .Weirs tib Leier's Mobi le Park. . . . . .350. . .Wel,ls 47 Little Flower Children`s Services. . .150. . .Wells _= 48 Montauk Air Force Station. . . . . . . 10. . .Wells 49 '4apeague Trailer Park. . 78. . .Wells S:� 50 Northport VA Hospital .• . . . . 3000. . Wei ls ' 5f Oak Park Trailer Park. . . . . . . . 50. . .Wells 52 Oakland Ridge Mobile Park. . . . . . . 74. . .Wells 51 Park Lake Rest Home. 46. .Wells 54 Peacock Alley. 35. . ,Wells - 55 Peconic River Trailer Park. . .90. ,Wells 55 vPconic View Adult Mobile Home Park. . 70. . .Wells _ 5" Pinecrest Garden Apartments... . . . .392. . .Wells -_ 58 Ramblewood Mobile Homes. . . .210. . .Wells S9 Ridge Rest Home. . . . . . . . 58. . .Wells - 6"Rocky Point Family Housing. . . . . . .55. . .Wells 61 Rollin Mobile Homes. . . . .220. .Wells _° 62 St Joseph Convent - Long Island university. 1177 Hells r 61 Sam A Lewison Start Center. . .40 . . •Wells Sorrth Bay Adult Home. .40. . .Wells 65 Southampton College. ... 1000. . .Wells - 016Speonk Mobile Home Park. . . 50. .Wells S7 Suffolk Developmental Center. .3500. . .Wells _- 68 Three Mile Harbor Trailer Park. . . .40. . .Wells b9 Thurm's Mobile Estates. . 450. . .Wells _- - 70 USCG Station - Moriches, . 23. . .Wells 7j Wes Dubicki Apartments. . . . . . . . .NA. . .Wells 466- oAr_r= 7R W (;I -PA ITMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: }- DATE: SUBJECT: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK 1 - Z PETER F. COHALAN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE ALDO ANDREOLI, P.E. JAMES C. MALONEY, P.E. AUGUST 11, 1982 SOUTHOLD TOWN LANDFILL DAVID HARRIS. M -D.. M.P.H. COMMISSIONER I have drafted a letter which I feel is acceptable with regard to an extension to the Southold landfill. On the enclosed map, I have indicated the approximate boundaries of the planned acquisition., in black. I have also indicated the location of the plot for -which a well permit was denied in red. Sy Robbins stated that a definite direction'of.plume movement from the existing landfill has not been determined. Ground- water._.monitgxn_g.._to._ the _southeast at a Suffolk County recharge basin—Caee---map)_ _has indicated contamination that may (or may n(3t) be due to the landf'' If. plume movement is to the northeast, then the proposed addition would expand the plume impact area (should liners fail) . I feel that liners should be required where plume direction is not known or can change with time. C' JCM/1st Atts. BRO DRIVE EAST IrPPA"E. N.Y. 1 1 7BB •`161 4 35-2917 s i DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS. M.D.. M.P.H. COMMISSIONER May 20, 1982 Town Board 53095 I.1ain Road Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: Re: Lot Located Town of Southold Tax Map 1096, Block yl, Parcel 106 A case was presented to the Board of Review on April 30, 1982 regarding �-ned by Mrs. Pearl Taylor. the above property o 11rs. Taylor was represented at the hearing by her niece, Mrs. Susan '.•:ason of 1050 lain Street, Riverhead, New York. Mrs. Mason indicated that her aunt wishes to relocate on the plot in question to be close to her rela- tives, Mr. and Mrs. James Mason, who live on the neighboring property. The applicant proposes an individual well; however, the property is only 8,300 square feet. Before our Board takes any further action on this par- cel, we want to be sure that the Town is fully aware of the circumstances. A private well, as proposed, to serve this site is hampered by the fact that the Town landfill property is approximately 200 feet from this lot. There is a serious question as to the long-term quality of an individual well serving this property. Even if the water,quality initially meets the standards, future treatment in order to maintain quality standards may be needed. Problems may also develop with further construction in this area due to the proximity of the landfill operation. Therefore, before our Board renders a determination, we would appreciate clarification on the following: 1. Are there any plans or does the Town anticipate any extension of public water mains to the residents within the area adjacent to the landfill, since water quality in this area has been demonstrated to be of questionable qual- ity? 2. Are there any plans or are steps anticipated to acquire additional lands surrounding the landfill in order to insure a greater buffer area in order �• to mitigate surrounding homeowners from being impacted by the daily opera- tion of the landfill? �S R�'BRO DRIVE EAST ■ HAUPPA UG E. N.Y. 1 1 707 ■ (5161435-2917 Toon Board Page 2 may 20, 1982 'In addition, we are forwarding for your review a copy of the survey which was made by the applicant, as well as a transcript of the hearing and a copy of Tag Map u96. An early reply would be appreciated so that we can forward our determina— tion to the applicant. If needed, we would be pleased to discuss this case with you in greater detail, - Very truly yo s, do Andreoli, P.E. Chairman Board of Review AA/j hn Attachments cc: lir. James Mason Robert A. Villa, P.E. GuNI'Y OF S LJ H -:'0L_K s r PETER F. COHALAN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE 1--10-A OF HEALTH SERVICES (larch 4, 1982 Mr. David DeRidder Associate Envi ronr,ental Analyst 'it ;v "11%orl, State Department of Environmental Conservation S. U. N. Y., Building _#40, Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 Dear Mr. DeRidder: DAVID HARRIS. M.D.. M.P.H. COMMISSIONER Re: Southold Town Municipal Solid Waste To Energy Facility Mr. Davids has asked if I would respond to your letter of February 23 regarding the above. Recognizing the experts available within your own department, I find it interesting that you would request this department to comment on the health implication of using treated sewage effluent in the proposed cooling tower. Nevertheless, I appreciate the opportunity to comment; however, before doing so, we would like to take advantage of your kind offer of sending to us the two volume report .from the Environmental Protection Agency entitled, "Effects of Pathogenic and Toxic Materials Transported Via Cooling Device Drift". I do wish you would give further consideration to an alternate, which was suggested in previous correspondence from this department, that is the use of groundwater instead of the sewage effluent.. In this particu- lar. -case there seem to be some obvious advantages to do so, one of which would be the elimination of the costly transmission main from the sewage treatment plant to the proposed site. The second is you would be usin round he e ix stin landfill. This water, since it is from the plume, has -little value inmee ino uture water su1 nee�cs,�ut its quality would be far more attractive as a coo ant than wou e the average effluent from a wastewater treatment plant. �'3La4gR0 [)RIVE EAST IIdlI3SG . N.Y. 11788 I Mir. David DeRidder Page 2 March 4, 1982 ' We look forward to receiving further information. Sincerely yours, Aldo Andreoli, P.E. Deputy Director Division of Environmental Health AA/ j hn cc: Albert Machlin, P.E. H. W. Davids, P.E. Honorable William R. Pell III James Maloney, P.E. �•;' .� r.? p: ;,-C"-ER : c,ENDCN & VJRi,ELL. P.0 ,,!EMO TO: FILE (SOHT 82-01) FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: H. A. DOMBECK JANUARY 28, 1982 MEETING TO DISCUSS CONSENT ORDER WITH THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LOCATION: BUILDING 40, SUNY AT STONY BROOK 10:15 AM PRESENT: H. A. DOMBECK, H2M TO-7j.iE COSTANZA, NYSDEC MORRIS BRUCK,M_AN, NYSDEC WILLIPM PELL, SUPERVISOR TO,vN OF SOUTHOLD LARRY MURDOCK, TOINTN BOARD, TOINTN OF SOUTHOLD JOSEPH T O[qNSEND, TOSNTN BOARD, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FRANK MURPHY, TOI%NN BOARD, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RAY DEAN, HIGHWAY SUPERINTENDENT, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ROBERT TASKER, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ATTORNEY JOHN NICKLES, TOW?' BOARD, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD !=EMS OF DISCUSSION: 1. M. Bruckman reported that Joan Scherb was out sick and could not attend. M. Bruckman reported that Southold landfill has been declared an open dump in accordance with RCRA due to methane problem. Leachate is a State groundwater matter. If the off-site methane migration is alleviated, then the Town of Southold landfill will be removed from the open dump inventory. H. DomdDeck requested that a consent order be negotiated that would provide that NYSDEC remove Southold from the open dump inventory i� Southold installs monitoring probes and installs a passive venting system or acquires additional property. Bruckman agreed that above items would be required for a consent order. M. Bruckman reported that there appears to be a problem with the definition of landfill property versus torn property. He called Albany to clarify this. He reported that if the Town purchases the land, or acquires the land in another manner such that access is limited, there are no structures, and the boundary is monitored, it will meet the require- ments for ownership, and if no further migration occurs, that the landfill can be removed from the open dump inventory. r' i „7:._'•'.cCHEn. M. c! L1:U,Uti 3 N.Jfi-;FLL, P. C. X710 TO FILE (SOHT 82-01) CONTINUED... 5. M. Bruckman reported that passive venting is a trial and error procedure. At the Smithtown Montclair landfill, vents were installed 50' apart. He suggested that initially venting be installed at 100' center and if the problem is not resolved further vents be installed at 50' center. 6. M.*Bruckman reported that he prefers two separate consent orders, one for open dump inventory and a second for leachate. _ 7. T. DeCostar.za reported that listing on the open dump inventory opens the town to a citizen suit unless a consent order regulates the facility. 8. With retard to leachate Bruckman reported that they want a monitoring system installed. Dombeck advised that such a system exists, was installed by Suffolk Colantv DeDar -:gent of !;ealtf'1 Se --vices a-nd was reported in r2M's mart 360 Report. B-uc?:n reDorted that off-site 1eachate is not correctable. Do:,Leck stated that lea.cha.t_e has t the landfill boundaries. Bruckman I- tated that additional we s may be required and he will confer with J. Baier of Suffolk County Department of Health Services to determine same. 9. M. Bruckman stated that he recognized that it is economically impossible to remove leachate''pollution. All new areas at landfills require liners. Bruckman reported that Babylon has sought a variance from the liner policy. Bruckman advised Southold to wait approximately 1 month for the Babylon decision before determining if it will seek a variance. 10. M. Bruckman stated that if'no interference with private wells are found -that... no off-site requirements would be placed on the Town for water supply. Dombeck reported no�e, of off-site private well contamination. 11. L. Murnock questioned whether ash is inert from a resource recovery facility. Bruckman stated that metals remain in the ash and that incineration concentrates the metals. Bruckman reported that a liner would be required for ash disposal. ,•(� i•,' .'�'y.F �.4rriE F. Mcl ENDO -N V ;i:-RFLL- C M,EM;O TO FILE (SORT 82-01) CONTINUED... 12. M. Bruckman stated that if the State upholds its liner policy in Babylon, he expects the continuation of the liner policy. 13. M. Bruckman requested sequential capping of the,.landfill. 14. M. Bruckman reported that he is understaffed, operates on a priority urgency and importance of the project basis. 15. H. Dombecv stated that the Town believed that it was not i n n(,n-CC�,�,_ 11; ante with its previous— cf-,nsent order and that the letter of January 5, 1982 from Joan Scherb was inappropriate as the Town was complying with ,its consent order. Bruckman agreed and said that the letter was in. error and that the February 8th meeting should be considered a compliance mor�ito.t_�]�_con{erence. 16. Discussions ensued concerning the to' of.land or acq',iistion of de�%elo Dment r' ^hts to alleviate me-IL-.-.a-7.,e micra _lon. ^ri?( _ti:.�1 rc�O� �eCha t i_ the !a-nd � 1S secured as a Duffer, access be 1.�.lted, nO structures, and the boundary monitored, then it will considered satisfactory and in compliance. 17. M. Bruckman reported that the intent of RCRA is to alleviate the danger of explosion. Dombeck advised that the adjacent land is utilized solely for agriculture, it is not considered an explosive danger. 18. H. Dombeck requested the contents of the consent order. Bruckman stated that the State would consider removal from the open dump inventory if the Town installs a methane monitoring system, acquires additional property or installs a passive venting system. Bruckman. reported that this should be completed no later than October 1984. T. DeConstanza reported that the next open dump inventory listing is September of 1982.. 19. M. Bruckman requested that Southold send a letter with a copy to Joan Scherb outlining the Town's request for the consent order. In less than 30 days, the State will prepare the consent order and Bruckman suggested that the letter also request a postponement of the February 8th `j meeting until after the Babylon variance. t_ Cal'„ �1 'r'-,= -U� "t-c�1_K PETER F. COHALAN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE '': TIARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES December 28, 1981 The Honorable A_ Marshall Irving Administrative Law Judge :Iew York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40 State University of New York Stony Brock, NY 11794 Dear Judge Irving: DAVID HARRIS. M.D.. M.P.H. COMMISSIONER SUBJECT: SOUTHOLD TO"114 MUNICIPAL SOLID ATASTE TO ENERGY FACILITY Enclosed please find comments from the Department of Health Services regarding the above project based on our review of the environmental impact statement submitted by the applicant. These comments may be received somewhat beyond the deadline, but I believe they impact the design,and some of the appurte- nances,planned for the project. The enclosed material contains two reviews: the first was per- formed by the staff of the Air Pollution Control Section, and the second was done by the Bureau of Water Resources. The air analysis presents some deficiencies within the EIS with regard to air pollution control and energy generation. Of primary concern is the conclusion reached that the evaporation rate from the plant would only necessitate cooling water slightly in ex- cess of 17,000 gallons per day. This is a substantial reduction in the amount considered, utilizing a force main from the Greenport sewage treatment plant. The Bureau of Water Resources has presented hydrog ologi.cal data and an analysis of the aquifer based on information on file with the Department of Health Services. It is concluded that the amount of water required for cooling as stated in the original aPPlication (150,000 cgpd average) can be adequately supplied from the existing -'andfill facility without adversely affecting any adjacent areas. Further, adequate fresh water supply for sanitary purposes is available below a clay layer located on site. 'Jo . • 4""o DRIVE EAST T� °HUGE. N f 1 1788 •.�I t3, 2917 The Honorable A. Marshall Irving Page 2 December 28, 1981 The above analyses and conclusions should impact the financial and technical aspects of the project, and it appears that the project should be further reviewed and possibly revised. Should you have any questions on the enclosed material, please do not hesitate to contact my office. Very truly yours, W. Davids, P.E. Director' Division of Environmental Health. HWD/ j b Enclosures (2) cc David Harris, M.D., M.P.H.•, Commissioner, SCDHS Joseph H. Daier, P.E., SCDHS ydames C. Maloney, P.E., SCDHS Anthony S. Candela, P.E., NYSDEC (w/encls) Hon. William R. Pell III, Supervisor, Town of Southold (w/encls) _ ry 5 ! 7 sv.- COUNTY OF SUFFOLK 's PETER F. COHALAN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES MEMORANDUM TO: Aldo Andreoli, P.E. DATE: December 11, 1981 f= FROM: Joseph H. Baier, P.E. SUBJECT: SOUTHOLD INCINERATOR PROP08AL During the past two years a considerable amount of groundwater and geological data have been accumulated by the department for the Southold Township area. In particular, an investigation of landfill plumes has started and also a study of aldicarb in groundwater around the landfill which are relevant to the proposal. The Bureau of Water Resources has reviewed the proposal --specifi- cally on the potential of installing pumping wells at the incinerator site. - Proposal To construct two wells: a 4 -inch, 20 gpm well and an 8 -inch 175 gpm well for sanitary use and cooling water pickup, respectively, at the Southold landfill. 175 2.52• L�D Hydrogeology Beneath the landfill there appears to be approximately 85 ft.± Of saturated water -table aquifer. This rests on a clay layer, which appears to be quite extensive in areal distribution and is approximately 50 ft. thick. Below the clay, at the landfill site, -•a second fresh water lens exists approximately 50 ft. thick. Eater Quantitv An analysis was made on the effect that this well would have on the water table in the surrounding area, and it was found to be minimal (1.0 ft.+ drawdown at landfill boundaries). The re- quested discharge is approximately one-third of that recommended by the Suffolk County Comprehensive Water Supply Study of 1970 i3 JE_750N LANE. P.O. eOx G '. NTRAL ISLIP. N.Y. 1 1 722 181234.2622 ,ielno to A. Andreoli which limited pumpage point, this well would of the area. 2 December 11, 1981 to 0.75 2SGD . From a water quantity stand - affect the water supply not dramatically Water Quality e plumes exist below landfills, including Southold. if Leach p laced on the landfill wouldite and helpthe the quench water well were placed the pumping an further downgradient and well screen located within the p I:eep the contamination from moving Y begin removing the leachate which would be evaporated as would g quench water.- ,_ it r =sults from the f resh water lens belowghe:c , ay Water quality layer indicate that water of satisfactory drinking quality available in this zone. Conclusions ro osed wells to the area's groundwater re - The impact of the proposed significant. Water -table drawdowns sources does not appear to be sig acent properties. are slight and will not adversely afwill fect any upconing of The presence of the clay theequench water well in the plume salt water, and locatingu the groundwater contamination from will assist in cleaning P on site, the leachate plume: Should the facility move ndwaterc, to design and construction, it is recomounce f quench water,.and that the prima source of q purposes - 20 oses. be used as the p be used for sanitary p P 20 gpm well installed below the clay JHB/jb � James_ Maloney.; =..: M j-.rJORANDUM T0: THE FILE FROM: STEVEN KRAMER DATE: 10/30/81 nig DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT - ENERGY DEVELOPP✓ENT CORPORATION ---------------------------------------------- = I reviewed this impact statement on 10/19 and 10/20. In essence, the statement emphasizes the fact that cnly good c&n come from the ='S installation of their ur.icess �t Southold`s Sour,' facility. The advantage of this proposed installation would rest specifically _ in the fact that the Town of SOu�hold would utilize .i.ncir.eration in lieu of current land disposal practices. The incinerator facility would occupy six acres and will be suppo wed by a sev�=n acre lined =^" landfill. This landfill and all associated cc;sts will be assu`�d ;:.. by the Town of Southold. My specific co:j-:tints on t_li_s r-por are as follows: I. Page 12 A. Cooling Water Option: 1. Utilization of wastewater from the Greenport STP. This option appears satisfactory although a piping system would have to be established to move this wastewater a distance of five to seven miles. The utilization ' of wastewater would have many benefits including the evaporation of same, therefore, eliminating the need for ocean disposal. 2. Utilization of water obtained from the Long Island Sound or Peconic Bay. a. Obvious corrosive problems associated with saline would impact heavily on mechanical parts of the system. b. Establishment of a new on-site well for cooling water .,' purposes. 1Jater quality underlying the existing Southold landfill is at least -as corrosive as water obtained from Long Island Sound or FE_onlc Bay. Our experience with on-site wells is that it reacts heavily on machinery finishes torus.discoloring and corroding external Darts. II. Page 30 7L - A. Reference is made concerning the destruction of dioxin and non -criteria pollutants during high temperature incineration >, ?- to efficiencies of 99.99. I have been unable to find any allegation. reference to support this WATER RESOuRCF,s �', "rThere are no surface water bodies Immediate or surface water located approximately e Project vicinity. tributary `j Long Island Sound estuarine_LI from two Y• The Project site +'_ the north Of the estuarine systems. j Project siteYstem lies appr'oxi.rr,atel The commerical, recreational, This system y 4500 feet region. A 1, aesthetic is Of tremendous site n. Easproximately 7500 feet to' and historic Value Creek, which the southeast +th to the Of the Great Fecon empties into °f the project pound 1C=Y• i?Zis the Cute,°Fue is of inestimable value testuary, iii:e th .'arbor, part o the 'e Long Is]and �roundwat reg, iS to �x.ca�ateder in the study area ` Portions of ranges ; n depth _�•' undisturbed the protect site fr'�m ' S feet ; <-,, Portion. 'in,s to 50 feet �, n the :s the only groundwater acui 0 f "n the Y available water suppl higher ands, which lie below the Gi { y for the area. Lhe Upper G] acial, PO gra, ac_al aquifer T' e r''a`-"rhI ;. studarea, - r in 'he western , are the ri Y area however, e. the T",29 -thy portions of the Cour,ty.mazn source • cr this aquifer i L of the pr- imapyslimitin this reason, t},e limitPo salty to be used capacity of the area ng fact, In dt erminin d `''iter supply is one =� 1 t the carrying _. human use and habitation. e importance of =' =s?and has maint2lnin =: � g good been recognized by the U.S.ound"ater quality ='- agency, which has -- on Long he Principal designated the aquifernsir'onrr;ental Protection T. =he Safe Deal source of drinkin ystem of Lon Finking J'ater Act g "ater under Section 1g24sland as Protects the groundwater from P'L' 93-523)' This de fie) of - dere is contamination signatiorn no public w by any Federal action. water supply available in the project r - egion. -23- COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PETER F. COHALAN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES MEMORANDUM TO: THE FILE FROM: STEVEN KRAMER DATE: °/4_/� 1 RE: RCRA CRITERIA (OPEN DUMP) On 8/27/81 a meeting was held at Southold Town Hall to inform Southold Town officials of the findings concerning their compliance with RCRA (oepn dump) criteria. Of the eight categories within this criteria, Southold violated that criteria pertaining to methane migration. _ I-lethane migration problems occur on the west and north side of this facility and is impacting on agricultural land currently used for potato cultivation. Present at this meeting were the following persons: Tony DeCostanzo, D. Walterding (ENCON), Ray Dean and W. Pell representing the Town. i Mr. Dean, opon receipt of this information, explained that he would contact H2M in the near future so as to provide them with the jot: of solving this migration problem. SK:daf CC: W. RObertS., : P.E. _ J. Maloney, P.E. i'4 "SON LANE -P .O. BOX G � ""A,L ISLIP. N.Y. 1 1 722 161234-2622 RA". •;..,y York State Department of EnvironmentConservation ,1.G. /,0, SUNY 1.;i1Y i,ROOK, NEW PORK 11794 751-7900 August 31, 1981 Mr. William R. Pell III S::oe rvisor 'Gown of Southold ";a in Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: CL4SSIFICATION OF THE SOUTHOLD SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY Robert F. Flacke Commissioner 1-,aar Nr. Pell: In accordance with Public Law 94-580, entitled "Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976," the Department of Environmental Conservation has completed the inventory of the Southold solid waste disposal facility. Under Section 4005 of Public Law 94-580, States are required to conduct an inventory of all solid waste facilities and practices to determine if those facilities are open dumas or sanitary landfills. The USEPA Administrator and the Bureau of Census will publish an inventory of all disposal sites in the United States which are classified as open dumps: The next submission date of open dump facilities to the Bureau of Census, for publication in the Federal Register on January 1, 1982, will be September 30, 1981. The criteria for the classification of the solid waste disposal facilities for which each site is inventoried include: r (1) flood plains, (2) endangered species, (3) surface water, (4) gr ound water, (5) application to land use for the production of food -chain crop"s, --(6) disease, (7) air, and (8) safety. A due process meeting was held with you on August 27, 1981, to discuss the results of- the open dump inventory for the Southold landfill. - 1 - tir, ldil.li.am R. Pell III Town of Southold PAGE II August 31, 1981 2_; -- The landfill was found to be in non-compliance on safety s: (explosive gases beyond the property boundary), 40 CFR Part 273.6. PT The landfill was also found to be in violation of New York Z.. State (6NYCRR Paet 703), Groundwater Standards. Violation of RC RA groundwater standards (40 CFR Part 257.3-4) is still being investigated. Based on the above non-compliance with the Federal criteria (published in the Federal Register, September. 13, 1979, 40 CFR Part 257 the Southold Landfi! as.been classified as an open dump. The results of the inventory were discussed at the August 27, 1981 meeting, and our files are available for inspection by your staff. . Phase contact me to arrange a meeting at which a consent corder to upgrade or close the landfill will be discussed. fi Very truly yours, Morris Bruckman, P.E. Regional Solid Waste Engr. ',IB / e f cc: N. NosencnuCK D. •Middleton J. Scherb A. Machlin r D. olterding Maloney R. C. Dean-Supt.,TN. of Southold 3 �1 C, E N L i! F 0 1A Ol t 0: 8 i 21 71 8 x �Clr 1!1:). Inc o; n y? [3. r 60 3 0 9 0 5 0 7r� 2 S 6. 0 c s 0 u T H 0 L D L A N D F I L L 7. F.- .N.O:R T H: :O:F! N,:'O.R'T;'H' 'R':O'A D: B'E T W'E.E N' :C 0 X A:N:D; 'D E.P'O:Tl IL-ASN E-S S.O.U.T:H 0 L: D.: 1.1 9 7 1 —9 :4-l! i0.1 !4:5 0 7 2: '3.0! 0!5 s, n 'T 0.14 N Oso:F- :U;TIH 0 L D,' :M'A.I.N* iS,T-R;E!EiT'; J-1 S 0.UT.H 0 L-DI N Y 11 9 7 1. I IlJ!.JCI. h1c'. 1B; Ale—lo GI0ok Parkway D.C.Curnbndyo, H;,;;_cI,usoliG02130 Houslon, Texas(617)661.3111 TWX710-320.0721 Terrance, California La Jolla, California August 13, 1981 Mr. Dennis Wolterding New York DEC Bureau of Waste Disposal 50 Wolf Road Albany, NY 12233 Watrlul Cruuk, Callfrjrnljj Paris, France Zurich, Swl;zerland Dear Mr. Wolterding: Enclosed are the analytical -.results for the ground- water samples from the solid wase facilities on Long Island, The results include: o pesticides (endrin, lindane, methoxychlor, toxaphene) o herbicides (2,4-D and Silvex) o specified trace metals o specified "wet chemistry" parameters. The following sampling codes were used: ERCO Organic N.Y. ID Lab ID ERCO Trace Metal ID `'V. Presti 22-069 51-861 Lloyd Love 22-070 51-862 Lloyd Love (duplicate) 22-071 51-863 Well '53329 (Cutchogue) 22-072 `1-864 Well '68916 (Southhold) 22-073 51-865 Well '30 (North Sea) 22-074 Well '48'32 51-866 (North Sea) 22-075 51-867 _Well 1#51172 (Shelter 22-076 51-868 Island) Graber Well 22-077 51-869 In addition to the pesticide compounds you requested to be analyzed, We also screen for PCBs in the same ex- tract. Please note that PCBs were found in the following samples: An Equal Gpporlunlly Employer &VF 4 - H Mr. Dennis t-:olterding Page Two August 13, 1981 22-069 PCB 1254 at 0. 1 ppb 22-073 PCB 1260 at 0.4 ppb 22-074 PCB 1260 at 3.0 ppb If you have any questions about this report, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, A. Dallas Wait Senior,.Organic Chemist ADW/pc July Z91 1081 r, Raymond C. Dean ':�t.ptrrintendent of Yigh,.% o«n of Southold F (.conic Lane F ,'conic, IN. Y. L 195 Dean: n *inspection was conducted at your Cutchoaue landfill on July 2" 19cl. 5t that time, Mr. Steven Kramer of my staff performed a methane mi;rtion scr,.•ey at said facility. I ould like to inform you that methane, in high concentr�xtions, is :1I,rating i;cyc.nd site perimeters. Highest concentrations were noted in the r, -)tato field to the west and north of the facility; l:ov,ever, no iz:ethane was noted to be migrating in a southerly direction towards occupied hamef. r: _- Flv-ee be advised that methane migration beyond Eite perimeters is a violation of jNYCFR Fart 360.S (b) (1) (vi). I v: _,uld also like to call your attention to the fact that refuse is pr otrud- st that you increase the amount of cover in;; throughout the facility and rec7ue currently being applied. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, V. illiam C. Roberts, 'F. E. , Chief Bureau of Environmental Pollution Control �' CR :SJY,:ets x .' L T ' M E M O R _A-N.._D._U M TO: The File FROM: Steven Kramer %ATE: 7/27/81 METHANE 14IGRATION SURVEY - SOUTHOLD LANDFILL RE: ---------------------------------------- At the request of D. Woltenting of the NYSDEC, an updated methane ,:-tigration survey was completed on 7/24/81. This survey confirms ,i�at methane migration in high concentrations exist beyond site perimeters on the west and north sides of this facility. ,,-'ie areas of impact continue to be utilized for agricultural purposes. Vegetation damage was noted approximately 100' from landfill perimeters. This damage is reflected in the browning of potato plant foliage. The occupied area to the south is closest to the old part of the facility and remains. gas free. SJK:daf cc: J. Maloney, P.E.. Analyzed for: - ,- ♦r:., r.�_ .. e:-<.4'4rp,.: __..:,gt....a ... , =asst::, _ -.. `.F"!P �r, ., _ G,%Z Pesticlde and I1erbfc1Je Analysis (IaLr nnalGP ,sts All Results In: 119/1 (piM - Reported by: Checked by: Compound:; I MCL Det' Limit 22-C69 22-070' 22-071 22-072 22-073 22-074 22-075 122-076!22-; endrin i 0:2 0.02 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND lindane 4.0. 0.4 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND � methoxychlor y 100 110.0 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND toxaphene 5.0 I 0.5 -- ND ND ND i ND ND ND ND ND I N 2,4-D 1100 1 10.0 j I ND � -ND ND ND ND ND ND i ND �- 2,4,5 -TP (Silvex) 10 10.0 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ! `' MCL-MaxiTiun Contaminant Level according to Interim Primary Drinking Water Regulations affective June 1977. Comments: alyzed for:_ New York State DEC' ENERGY RESOURCES CO. INC TRACE METAL ANALYSIS - Report Sheet - (Ng/1) l03V,V/ 1 0-L Date Analysis Completed 8/3/81 Checked by AW ERCO tCO ORGANIC [D ID As' Ba Cd Cr Cu Fe Pb Mn Hg Ni* Se Ag L.. C3 861 22-06X 6 670 <0.5 13 2,400 580 <5 180 <0.1 280 <5 <0.5 24 862 22-070 <5 <70 <0.5 <4 120 140 <5 15 <0.1 <5 <5 <0.5 32 .... 863 22-071 <5 <70 <0.5 <4 120 130 <5 19 <0.1 <5 <5 <0.5 32 864 22-072 <580 <0.5 <4 150 OI <5 35 <0.1 <5 <5 <0.5 216 864 C Duplicate 22-072 <5 <70 <0.5 <4 150 420 <5 33y <0.1 <5 <5 <0.5 19� 865 22-073 <5 <70 <0.5 <4 13 160 <5 40 <0.1 21 <5 <0.5 2u If *no customer charge has any questions regarding for Ni analysis, refer to sample in question by its ERCO IDtt. analysis Sample Rcvd. 7/15/81 Reported by_C( Date Analysis Completed 8/3/81 Checked by AW .., ' pit; i,-. :f " {�p;.'tl�ii �'4��1';if"?l�; i!, St `+.,.y Jr. Air�XiYifi�l:.��i ��iSliiir „�•t r ENERGY RESOURCES CO. INC TRACE METAL ANALYSIS _ Report Sheet alyzed for: New York State DEC' ERCO n RCO ORGANIC ID ID As Ba Cd Cr Cu Fe Pb Mn Hg Ni* Se Ag L.. Date Analysis Completed 8/3/81 Checked by�ic% -861 22-06A 6 670 <0.5 13 2,400 580 <5 180 <0.1 280 <5 <0.5 -862 22-070 <5 <70 <0.5 <4 120 140 <5 15 <0.1 <5 <5 <0.5 32 -863 22-071 <5 <70 <0.5 <4 120 130 <5 19 <0.1 <5 <5 <0.5 32. -864 22-072 <5 80 <0.5 <4 150 �2 0' <5 35 <0.1 <5 <5 <0.5 21u -864 22-072 <5 <70 <0.5 <4 150 420 <5 33 <0.1 <5 <5 <0.5 1910 :0 Duplicate -865 22-073 <5 <70 <0.5 <4 13 160 <5 40 <0.1 21 <5 <0.5 24 If customer has any questions regarding analysis, refer to sample in question by its ERCO IDtt. *no charge for Ni analysis Sample Rcvd. 7/15/81 Reported by Date Analysis Completed 8/3/81 Checked by�ic% ENERGY RESOURCES CO. INC TRACE METAL ANALYSIS - Report Sheet - ( yzed for: New Yorlc State DEC ERCO D ORGANIC ID As Ba Cd Cr Cu Fe Pb Mn Hg Ni Se Ag 36 22-074 <5 990 <0.5 <4 7 25,000 <5 8,100 <0.1 8 <5 <0.5 16 37 22-075 <5 <70 <0.5 <4 <5 1,700 <5 19 <0.1 <5 <5 <0.5 <8 )8 22-076 <5 <70 <0.5 <4 <5 110 <5 11 <0.1 <5 <5 <0.5 12 8 22-076 Duplicate <5 <70 <0.5 <4 <5 110 <5 11 <0.1 <5 <5 <0.5 i2 9 22-077 <5 160 1.5 <4 <5 14,800 <5 7,100 <0.1 <5 <5 <0.5 100 Blank <5 <70 <0.5 <4 <5 <20 <5 <10 <0.1 <5 <5 <0.5 <8 If customer has any questions regarding analysis, refer to sample in question.by its ERCO IDS. Sample Rcvd. 7/15/81 Reported by I�Z' Date Analysis Completed 8/3/81 Checked by (,� a Ei7f:ltGY RESOURCES Co. It:C WET CHEMISTRY A;]ALYSIS - Report Sheet - Analyzed for: New York State DEC Parameter ( 22-069 22-070 22-071 22-072 22-073 22-074 22-075 22-076 22-077 (1) Total organic carbon (mg/1) 260 3.0 2.0 16 35 27 26 24 14 (2) Chloride (mg/1) 50 24 18 29 270 52 9.0 19 18 (3) Fluoride (mg/1) 0.22 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.21 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 (4) Color (platinum std. comp.) '. 220. <5 <5 <5 30 <5 5 <5 <5 (5) Odor (threshhold number) 3 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 (6) Sulfate as SO4g (m /1) 16 5.6 2.8 97 170 4.2 5.1 22 11 (7) Total dissolved solids (mg/1) 2600 65 68 260 C15i3O) 260 57 170 120 (8) Conductivity at 25°C (umhos/cm) �i500 -- 110 98 450 2900 620 93 230 310 (9) PH 6.9 5.0 5.0 5.5, -6.4 6.2 6.4 5.5 5.5 Sample Rcvd. 7/15/81 Date Analysis Completed 8/4/81 COUNTY 01="SUFFOLK �� s vt 9:1A cej DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH'SERVICES ?MEMO RAN D UM TO: JAMES C. MALONEY, P.E. DATE:: 11/14/80 rROM: STEVEN KRAMER "E: SOUTHOLD LANDFILL - LANDFILLING OF OIL -SOAKED EARTH To weep you un -to -date on the de—1 on;-ients f-oncerning Southo' ^oven's acceptance of oil soaked earth generated by a spill which occured at Goldsmith & Tuthills Tank Farm located at Flanders, :ew York, T have been informed by Judy Foster who inspected this `acility on 11/10/80 that two truck loads of this material did enter the landfill as condoned by Ray Dean, Superintendent of i;ighways, Town of Southold. There exists a question as to why the Town of Southampton's waste should end up in the Southold Landfill and why this waste was not transported to Brookhaven's Horseblock Road Facility. I will keep you abreast of developments in this situation and gave informed Mr. Robert Olsen of our request to be provided %with his reports and documents relating to the spill and transpor- tation of this material to Southold. SJK:daf 65 JETSON LANE HAUPPAUGE. NEW YORK 11787 (516) 2342622 , COUNTY O "UI~F(DI_K DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES MEMORANDUM -INTRAOFFICE TO: JAMES C. MALONEY, P.E. FROM: STEVEN KRAMER DATE: 11/5/80 RE: LANDFILLING OF ASPHALT MIX AT SOUTHOLD LANDFILL _ ------------------------------------------------------------ I have been informed by Mr. Robert Olsen of this department that the Town of Southold has agreed to accept a large quantityc£ asphalt mix at the landfill. Mr. Olsen described this material as a liquid of varying viscosity from a near solid to liquid. This material <.7ill be generated by the demolition of a tank farm located on Mattituck Inlet, Mattituck, New York. This section will have to respond to the Town of Southold concerning ultimate disposal of this material and our ob- jection to its being buried at the landfill. SJK: d cc: Morris Bruckman, P.E. I 65 JETSON LANE HAUPPAUGE, NEW YORK 11787 - •(516(234.2622 ':,3,r/ York State Department of Environmental Conservation .,!)G.1r40, SUNY ,"PONY BROOK, NEW YORK 11794 ;16) 751-7900 t1r. Raymond C. Dean Superintendent of Highways gown of Southold Peconic Lane Peconic, New York 119SR RE: t; Robert F. Flacke Commissioner August 11, 1980 JJ z R SUFFOLK cn • _ HEALI}j SEh'r1Cc�L'i. TO,''N OF SOUTHOLD LANDFILL - APPLICATION NO.52-S-17 MEETING ON AUGUST 5, 1980 ATTENDEES: Paul Lappano Steve Kramer Ray Dean Ray Jacobs Brij Shrivastava Dear Mr. Dean: Our disussion at the referenced meeting centered "round the possibility of a draft which could be used as conditions for a conditional permit. Attached is such a draft, which members at the meeting seemed agreeable with. The dates for submission are reasonable, which I feel can give ample time for their being met. If this is acceptable, please let me know in writing by September 1, 1980. As we discussed at the meeting, I could then file a negative declaration under SEQR, wait 30 days for a public 10'm-nent period, and unless a hearing is necessary on technical or_o_ nds, a permit could be issued with the conditions to k'hich we agreed. - 1 - Raymond C. Dean down of Southold I)AGE II I,ugust 11, 1980 As regards,the exposed brush pile, this violation should be corrected as soon as possible to avoid a fire hazard. If I may be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Q, Paul Lappano, Asst. Sanitary Enar. PL/ef Enc. - cc: W. Bell - Supervisor B,Z Shrivastava, H2M Kramer, SCDHS Town Board D. rJafrici - Albany J. Baier SCDHS loll i DRAFT SCHEDULE 1. Submit report addressing all pertinent details for lining, capping, methane monitoring and venting, storm drainage, leachate collection and treatment with schedule for implementation by January 30, 1981. 2. Test all private wells as recommended in 12/11/79 letter and revise groundwater monitoring locations. Based on Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services well data and private well data. Submit schedule for implementation by October 30, 1980. 3. Sunmit Quarterly progress report beginning April 1981. 4. Begin Planting Plan as soon as possible. PL/ef 8/11/80 To: From: iDEPARTI•lEN. ,r OF I3i:1ALT:i Si= ItVI'CES INTEROFFICE MEMOP.AN'DUTM James C. Maloney, P. E. Steven J. Kramer Subject: Southold Landfill Hearing. Date: Auguste, 1980 On August 5, 1980 a meeting was held of N-�-'S DEC, Bu It,',.-*-tg 40, State University at Stony Brook to discuss a conditional operating permit for the Town of Southold Landfill, Sound Avenue, Cutchogue, New York. Agreed to at this meeting was the following: That by January 1st, 1981 the Town of Southold Consultant, H2M Corporation, would provide New York State DEC with reports, plans and dates with respect to: 1. Lining 2. Capping 3. Leachate -collection and treatment 4. Storm drainage 5. Groundwater monitoring. That by October 30, 1980 the Town will provide NYS DEC with test information concerning groundwater and well water quality in this area. Included will be a list of contaminants, the establishing of additional monitoring wells to insure that the above requirements will be adhered to, Mr. Lapano suggested that the Town provide NYS DEC with quarterly progress reports Also discussed at this meeting was the problem of blowing papers at this Site. Mr. Dean agreed to convert a leaf sucker to the purpose of removing Papers from fence lines on the perimeter of the landfill. 1 questioned Mr. Dean concerning Shelter Island and his use of Southold Landfill sites in the near future. He indicated that he has not been contacted by Shelter Island Officials concerning this matter. Ste: mew York State Department of Epvironme it -fl Conservation i-40, SUNY C L'ROOK, NEW YORK 11794 �7'G) 751-7900 Robert F. Flacke Commissioner July 15, 1980 :r. Raymond C. Dean I:upt. of Highways Town of Southold Feconic Lane neconic, i ew York 11958 RE: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LANDFILL INSPECTION 7/10/80 Dear Mr. Dean: On the above date I inspected your landfill. An extremely high lift of approximately 30 feet or" uncovered brush remains in the active mining area. This is unmanageable, unsafe and may prove to be a fire hazard. This should be covered and decreased to a lift of 10 feet as soon as possible. Methane gas was also detected off the landfill site on the south side in amounts of 10/ gas and offsite on the west side in amounts of 30/ gas. I have also noticed that your not making any attempt to stockpile the clay seam that you have encountered in the active mining area. It would be wise to take samples of this clay, and'have it tested for permeability and grain size characteristics since it may be useful as, either a lining material, or a capping material. In closing, I would like to state that the brush conditions should be corrected immediately and plans for -the mitigation of methane migration should begin. I expect to see some improvements in a month, when I again re -inspect the site. Failure to correct these violations may -result in legal action. - 1 - I Mr. Raymond C. Dean , Town of Southold PAGE II July 15, 1980 If you have any question, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, 110 Paul rappano, Asst. Sanitary Engr. PL/ef cc: /rij- M. Shrivastava - H2M teve Kramer - SCDHS Dave Mafrici - Albany Wm. Pell - Supv. -Town Board t evv York State Department of Environrnente l Conservation .31,DG.n40, SUNY :,'PONY BROOK, NEW YORK 11794 (5 16) 751-7900 Mr. Brij M. Shrivastava Project Manager Holzmacher, !McLendon and 500 Broad Hollow Road Melvi] —, New York 11746 `� ! i £E' December 11, 1979 Murrell, P.C. RE: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATION r52 -S•-17 Dear Mr. Shrivastava: Peter A. A. Berle, Commissioner As per our December 7, 1979 meeting, I would like to confirm the statements of our meeting as per the groundwater monitoring proposal in the June 1979, proposal. The report states on pg. 4.26: "Existence of large amounts of soil underneath the Southold landfill provides an adequate buffer zone between the refuse fill and the ground- water, which presumably minimizes leachate collection or treatment system at present. Proper daily operation of the sanitary landfill controls leachate pollution." This is not the case in light of the 208 Study, Kimmel & Braids, 1975, Roberts & Sangrey, 1977, Suffolk County Dept. of Health Sayville Study, etc. It is also agreed that the 360 report is deficient as concerns preliminary :monitoring is concerned. Private wells should be tested, (see attached list Of constituents to test for) as well as, irrigation wells in the N.W. direction. Also note page 7.1 of the report, which states a north easterly groundwater flow direction while Fig. 7-1 indicates a north westerly direction. s% Once the testing information is gathered, perhaps a less costly monitoring system can be devised. If for example, the wells tested. indicate leachate contamination, they will give T; a good picture as to extent of the plume. If leachate is not - 1 - Wi I Mr. Brij M. Shrivastava liolzmacher, McLendon and Murrell, P.C. Page II i December 11, 1979 present, perhaps they may be used as monitoring wells. Upon receipt of the analysis, a deep well will be needed (200' - 300') . Needless to say, the Suffolk County Dept. of Health, Joe Baier, and BobVi_lla will Supply any additional information, i.e., previous testing results, that are available,'and you should contact them directly. As far as, offsite monitoring w-ll.s are concerned, and depending or what the private well testing shows, the Suffolk County Dept. of Health nay be able to assist in the construction of wells. Sincerely yours, Paul Lappano, PL/ef Asst. Sanitary Engr. cc: J. Homan Dean J. Maloney R. Villa J. Baier i N (:O:�STjTU- NTS TO BE TESTED FOR IN LANDFILL LEACIIA'lTE 11O1'ITORIi�G ti%'ELLS 1. Alkalinity 2. Aluminum 3. T�.mmon i a ;. Arsenic 5. BOD 6. Boron 7. Calcium 3. Chlorides 9. Chromium 10. Copper 11. Color 12. COD 13. Detergents 14. Florides 15. Hardness 16. Iron 17. Kjeldahl Nitrogen (Total) 18 • Lead 19• Mangenese 20. Mercury 21. Nickel 22. Nitrate 23. Nitrite 24. Phenol 25. PH 26. Potassium 27.' Phosphate 28. Sodium 29. Silv`r 30. Selenium 31. Specific Conductivity 32. Sulfate 33. Silicon 34. TOC 35. Total Solids 36. Zinc 37. Trace Organics: (a) Chloroform (b) Tetrachloroethylene (c) 1,1,1 Trichlorethane (d) Vinyl chloride (e) Carbon Tetrachloride (f) Trichloroethylene York` late cepa rtmont of Environmental Conslerva',on Jinb 40, SLIMY, Stony Brook, N. Y. 11./94 t•:iv) 751-7500 November 13, 1979 Mr. Brij Schrivastowa, P.E. HOLZi1ACHER, McCLEINTDON & MURRELL, P.C. Consulting Engineers 560 Broadhollow Road Melville, New York 11747 Dear Mr. Schrivastowa: J • - r:..i:�f � •j. PobL:rt F. Flacke. C un:missiuner r� 9 Re: Town of Southold Application 52-S-17 As per our review of the June 1979 report, the following information must be submitted: Page 3.9: Areas 2 and 3 should have groundwater depth determined by boring to demonstrate 5' separation for future landfill areas. The ". large amounts of soil underneath the Southold land- fill ." as per 4.9.2, is not the case from borings supplied. Page 3.15: While the Southold -Shelter Island 201 Study is proceeding and will eventually recommend the disposition of scavenger waste, the current lagooning must be carried out as per 6.1.b(3)(a), and (c) or (d), of the guidelines. In addition, more acceptable docking arrangements for dumping of waste should be constructed; i.e., concrete or macadam ramp. Schedules for lagoon operation — c.leaning, filling, etc. —should be submitted. Page 4.30: Methane monitoring to include placement of PVC wells for monitoring points. A recent inspection on 9/26/79 indicated methane readings_of_20% gas alo g west property line. Submit location for PVC pipe location (i.e., structures, crop lands, roads). 'Also, venting structures should be placed as landfill is developed; i.e., PVC pipe, cast -concrete leaching or cess- pool rings. Illustrate location and type of materials to be used. Mr. Brij Schrivastowa, P.E. November 13, 1979 Page 2 Page 9.2E: Reconbnendati�ons to control blowing paper are acceptable. These should be' implemented since inspection reports indicate this is a continuous problem. Planting of wind screen is also acceptable. Details for capping, 'lining, leachate treatment disposal, and storm drainage, as per 9/10/79 correspondence, should be submitted as part of the application. Table 6-2 footnote (a) mentions ". . .environmental protection measures." Does this include liner -:z and leachate treaty„ent? With regard to groundwater monitoring, I look forward to -our 11/20/79 meeting at 10:00 a.m. to discuss particulars, as well as the recommendations in the report. Sincerely yours, Paul Lappano Assistant Sanitary Engineer PL: va cc: Ra}mond C. Dean, Superintendent of Highways Philip Barbato James Maloney Joseph Baier C OUNTY OF SUI= -:01-K DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES TO: Robert Olsen FROM: Steven J. Kramer SUBJECT: Southold Landfill Date: October 26,1979 On October 18, 1979, I inspected the Southold landfill, with the intention of following up your indication that 55 -gallon drums were in fact being stock piled at this facility. The only drums on site, were those located adjacent to the 275 gallon tank the Town utilizes for waste oil containment. The 55 gallon drums are used for overflow Purposes. The location of these drums is immediately to the north of the shanty on premises. Please advise me if we are not talking about the same thing. Thanks for your help. SJK:sp SS JETSON LANE • HAUPPAUGE, NEW YORK 11787 (51 6) 23C-2622 TO: Dennis Moran, Fealth Services Date: October 15, 19;9 FROM: SLeven J. Kramer SURJ}?CT: SOUthold L1ndifill Would you kindly test ":he wells located irmeaiately south of the Srnit'sioJ_d lan:�fii1, located on Scur_d Avenue, Cutchogue, New York for nossibl e o_lt_=.� i-:,��ts of _anlfili ori g1 n ani suPP yv ;pie with 'he ra _,.lts of this r'l13n}: you f -or your coc:nt:raticin in this matter S.7k: S^ I h :i`,:)if' 0t:'!;'ariitl '(1`c Gf-Er, itor, ITICIII Ci)i-iSeIV' 6r1 YOPK 11 794 a VY R� Pnlrr A. A. Iinrir, Cwi;1T1i tr } i1vu,r ja::es iioman Supe r': iSur IG',•%n Of SOuthcld 5:'095 1•; in Road Scutt -,Old, l�ew York 11971 Septe,�zber 10, 1979 R -E : T91%71\1 SOiTTi?OLD !-A-N7) 1LL LIC j 'lOT; '17 ID -17 ---- - Dear Mr. Doman: Attac}-,ed are copies of our Rey i oral Solid vl7as to (S: -,T) , and Part 360 Leachate Attenuation and Liner Polic-' Current 1-iydrogeolog4cal information locates t:ie landfill in Zone IBJ, and condition two of the Solid 1•:aste Policy appl-ies. Thus, the approximately 14 acres remaining Will require t,,,. -,o and tl.e entire lar.ufil.l capped ',,:hen completed as per condition four Of the Solid i•;aste Policy. Plans and specifications for lining, storm drainage, cap,inc and leachate treatment as per P360L must be submitted as part of the application. If I r:-tay be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to coritact me or Paul Lappano. Sin 5 , / yours, 1.orris L�ac};ri:tf1, P. Regicnal Solid Waste Engr. ttd.- cc: D. ,Middleton R. Dean ".alrici B. Shivas nava DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICE=S August 13, 1979 mr. Paul Lappano Asst. Sanitary Engineer e:,7 York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40 State University of New York Stony Brook, NY 11794 Dear Mr. Lappano: SUBJECT: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LANDFILL This is in response to your request for comments on the recently submitted Solid Waste Management Report for the Town of Southold. The monitoring proposed in the report basically complies with existing Part 360 of the State Environmental Code. However, because of the unique Long Island ground water situation and the fact that it is the sole source of drinking water for the County residents, a much more elaborate monitor- ing net -work is necessary to properly define areas of contamination. A monitoring network of this type will be expensive to install and take time to complete. Before making specific recommenda- tions with regard to this landfill, I believe it is in the interest of the residents of the Town of Southold that the fol- lowing information be provided: 1. direction of ground water; 2. theoretical size of leachate plume; 3. location of any private and public supply wells that are downgradient of the landfill. - With the above information several cost-effective alternatives may then be open to the town: a) provide public water; ``1 j�TSOry LANE • HAUPPAUGE. NEW YORK 11787 • IS 16) 234-2622 Til'. T,appano Page 2 T�ugust 13, 1979 b) -utilize private wells for the monitoring system; c) restrict development and use of ground water down - gradient of the landfill; d) determine water quality downgradient of the landfill. by sampling public and private wells. From an aerial of the Southold landfill and its theoretical leachate plume, it appears that only a few farm residents will be impacted by the plume. Sampling of their drinking water should commence as soon as possible to determine if contamina- tion from the suspected 1e4,!�hate plume has occurred. It may develop that no wells are affected, in which case the minimum Part 360 regulations could be considered. -'Conversely, private wells could be affected by leachate,and public supply �,ould have to be provided. Regardless of the case, contamina- tion of the water supply is taking place, and any protection of the water being consumed by the residents should be of the highest priority. Some of the information mentioned above is already available at our office (nos. 1 and 2 above). I suggest that your office, the Town's consultant and my office meet'to discuss the matter. • Very truly yours, B A�� : e�s aier, P.E., Chief resh Water Monitoring Unit JIIB/jb cc Mr. James Maloney Mr. Robert Villa TO: Paul Lappano, .asst. Sanitary Engineer FROM: Jaries C. Maloney, P. E. RE: Solid I.7aste Management Plan and Report "'o:an of Southold July 24, 1979 I have reviewed the above referenced report. The dornx on` addresses d11 of the points necessary for compliance with recuir cnents for a permit to operate a solid waste disposal facility. - T`',ere are a num'Der of points and statements made in the re- port to �;'rich I take eyception, or question. Of these points, five should be addressed: i. A'though a need for methane monitoring program was indicated, :10 such progra:n z; as outlined within the report; at the least, a recorLmendation for methane monitor locations on the periphery of the landfill should have been made. 2. It was stated that it may be necessary to maintain gas venting structures for five years. Plans should be made to monitor methane migration for a period of longer than five years because certain studies have shown that methane can be generated for as 'Long as fifty years. 3. It is a Part 360 requirement that refuse is not to be placed to a depth to which the separation distance -between groundwater and the refuse is less than five feet. Soil borings A, B and C indicate that the greatest distance between placed reuse and ground- water is 3' and that the minimum distance was 1.51. Care should be taken that refuse not be Placed within 5° of the highest recorded groundwater elevation. 4. It is indicated on Page 7.1 that groundwater flows in a nort::E�asterly direction. However, Figure 4r7-1 indi- cates that groundwater flow is inyhe- northwe_s_terly direction and Places groundwater monitoring wells accordingly. Although I am sure this -A,_' --an oversight, correction to the report should be mpde in.-nediately. TO: Pail Lam_ parvo _' 2 The report has not yet been reviewed by 1,11r. Eaier of this department for adequacy as to the'number of �:,onitoring Yells and their location. iris com�,e:,ts will be submitted separately. jC'":ft CCs A. W. Davids, P. E. W. C. Roberts, N. A. Dombeck, P.E., Vico Prrrilent d. f12`4 (iioiz:n: er a^r e d n & Murrell) 500 Broad Hollow Road Melville, NY 11747 _ - _ �_ M'a!?-c"� j'�t`°�,�•"���'•?�•,'"C'L,. �r.- ;_._ - - = -'+._j."`- .� tom+-.�-�' Cif.17 Il'11' Coiiservatlon ns; ljil c :;�1 SLur,v '.i -.,,,,k, N. 1'. l 1.1194 ;.) 15i-7000 Pcler A. A. Berle, Cummis s loner July 20, 1979 - I i Nr. rank A. }.J jc JSinl, jr., t r: f r,an uti-,old Tin• -n Cclnservation Advisory Council SOUtiiold, ?.C:w York 11971 S:::•:• -- Ku;av-ski: Your letter of _-uly -11, 1979 to Mr. R. Pale of this Department lies been forwarded to this office for response. Part 215 of Title 6 of the :yaw YorK State Codes, Rules and Regulations prohibits open burning of rubbish generated by residential activities in any to:cn wi t a total to :=fi popu la t ion, V inc lud i nc incorporated or unincorporated areas, of eater than '110,000r, the. :is the population of the Town of Southold is in excess of this number, the prohibicion is applicable within the cwn.- Subsection 215.3(a) of the sa;ie regulation, allows for the restricted burning of land clearing and/or demolition materials, provided that such burning is gone in accordance ,=it' a ;;ermit issued by Lhis Department, after written appl;cation. Since the Suffolk- County Dciartment of Health Services is an az�=tit for this h`parL(-,tent, ,nyer:e wisnin9 to burn materials of this t\'pe should be directed to Air. James iia lone S, of. that agency for a permit application. Mr. ;•ialoney's office is the sole agency within Suffolk County which has been delegated the authority to issue permits to conduct open burning in the County. This permit issuing authority cannot be delegated to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council, as you have requested. 1f I may be of further assistaf�ce regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me. \%era' truly yours, f Robert l': Schneck, P. E. Senior Sanitary Engineer RW S : a cc: R. Capp R. Ha je J. ?''alone y, SCDrS 65 Jetson Lane, Hauppauge, N.Y. 11757 r I' I I STATE_ OF NEW YORK PEPART1•1ENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION I. In .tile Platten o6.,theee .A-P-tgd. X V�i.oZat�(.o11 06 Pa,tt 360 06 T.itte 6 op .the Codes, Rutes and Regutati oris G6 the State 06 New Ymk, ORDER ON CONSENT IPy ;I TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FILE NO. .1-0369 (Su6'o,1_k Countiy) .Rapp,deat X alleges that it WHEREAS, the 1)o_pa,41-L"ment/has do..^umente.d van.ious v.iozat;_QjjA- ,o6 PaAt 360 o6 6 NYCizR; and �I (WHEREAS, .the Respondent leas Waived .;.ts )tight to a pubtic ;,hea.ting in th.i.5 matteA in the mamieL p Dov dcd by .Caw, amd hav%lig conhented to ,tile tis5uijio and enteL.ing o�y "• �.5 O�dc-.yAees to be bound by ,tile teAms heAe�_n; I, NOW, having eo►is.i d erred this matte, aid be�.ny du.Cy advised, ORDERED the Respondent .6hatt .5t ".ic.tZif comp.' y cc.ith the tenmb and cond.ition•s set jlmth .in the comptiance .sche'ut.e, known as Sehedute A, attached heAeto and made a paAt heAeo6; and it -i.5 ';6uAtheA ORDERED, that with "La ec-t to -the a6c,LLua.id v.iota.t.ion, -thele •.is heLeby .imposed upon Respondent, a pena.Ct; .in ,tile sum o6 One IThousand ($1,000) Dot.Cans, said bine to be 5u.5pended .i6 Respondentcompti'es st&.ietZy with tike teams and cc.nd,,t.i.on5 set 6oLth .in 5a.id i-Schedute A; and .it .is 6uAtheA ORDERED, that wheneveA the Regiona.t Eng.ineeA 6m Env.iAon- !'menta.t Quatity deems it necessary oA de,6iAabte to .i11.5pect the � pnem.ises o6 Re.spondent to ven.i6y pLogAess .in achievilig eGmpCiance i,-(.11 connection herewith, he GA his AepAesentat.ive sha.t.0 be a.t.Cowed "to go upon such pAem.iSes at any ,Lea.6onabZc hours and shat -t- be g..ven ,such a5.5istance by Respondent as .is necC55a.'cy 6oA ,the p%LopeA con - ddct G6 .5uch an inspection; and .it .is 6u,�L.theA ORDERED, that this OAdeA 6haZt be bind' ltg Gni ReSpGltde�it, Zucce•5ss o''�a{id a5,5igns and aU peA.5Cli6 iL , 6(.mb and co,LpoAatiofis aCt{ lig U1lderi UA 6GA it, inc• ud-(.11C{{, but Iiett .Lm ,' i ed i C t1105 e I41110 may ca, -L, -Ly on any oA aZZ o6 the opeAa.t.('Gll.5 HOW bunt' eo)iducted by 'Respolident, cohethen at ,the p,Luent Cocatcon c,•i at alit' atilleA in i;tltis State; and .it is vuAtlie-'c i� li ORCERED, that .in .those in.5taices Ln c.!h i.ch tice Respoaden.t Ides-iAes that any o6 the pAc'vi5.coli5, te.,Lm:s and coiid-itiolis o6 this I I !j i' OAdeA be ehalzg ed, it .5 haU .the g ,ou►td6 610A .the Jzelie� Sclze•7.b, Rcgio►1at A,t,tmitey, Yo Ah, Stony BAooh, New YoAh i� Mahe w-L•i•t.ten apptica.t.ion, 6etti►>g 60hth Sought to .elle Coomii66.ioneA, C/O Joan B. Bttitd.i►1g 40, State Univeh.6ity o6 New 11794; and it iL 6uh.•theA 1; ORDERED, that any change in .th.i6 OAden 6ha.0 not be made oA become e66ec.t.ive, except a6 6pecigica.L.Ly bet �oAth by wA.i,t,ten jl oAdeA 06 .the Comm,i66ionet, such wti-t.ten mdeA being made e-itheA I upon aj,ALi,t.ten apptica,t.ion o% .the Rapondent oA upon the Comm.i6- 6"ioneA 6 own 6 ind.ing6 . Dated: Atbany, New YoAh _ "- 1� 1979 ROBERT F. FLACKS j C0M111i,56"ionen oU Env.i.tonmen"tat Con6eAva.ti-on By DONALD -J. �M DDEETO' ► Reg•i..ona.0 D-iAeetioA ,CONSENT BY RESPONDENT Re-spondent achnewr.Ledge.6 the authoA.i,ty and juA-i6dici.tio►1 o :'the Comrn.i6.5.ioneA o4 Env.i.tonrrenta't Co►16nvati.ion o6 she Safe os New Yor�h .to .i.66ue the 6oAego.ing OAdeA, wa.ivea pub.C.ic hearing on � 'o"theA phoceedino6 .in •th.i6 ma.tteA, aecept6 the•tetm6 and cond.i•t.ion6 e ise•t 6oA.th in the OAdeA and eon6en"t6 .to .the -i66uance •the/zeo6 �I TOWN OF SOUTHOLD By 'STATE OF NEW YORK) I' Z-6. . !COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) h On .ther7 '� � J day os � 1979, b e 6 o A e me peA.SonaZty ,came came .'/f,�'f i;�, /��,.'�'�/� to me known, who be•i.rtq duCa deposed and 6a.id that he he Ae.6.:de6 at ('.:c,�,c;,',.�� Y i�'E•,, fc:� , ;tha.t that .i6 .the ��<�F-W v,.scP he executed the 'mego.ing o6 the To-oi; c-6 Southold and T� Town, with 6uU au.thoA.ity 6o co►16ent .to do. SoA a►,d on behaZ" o6 said = r ITo: Non. A..fa tocchia i Ta(on 0 Soutiho Cd , ti -0 T A R F PUBLIC 53095 kfa.in Road li Sou•thotd, N. Y. 1 1971 JU7iTH T T. Ti�ZY �� :•3: f:� :•, 1'�rk I i � .-�+ro.�.....,.<.--••r=^: � n•-r-......-.;.R>-��-•s.-ev�•.•�..-r r--- c�.e....r-, _ QaYs�3=m�c�.'a:_'�sr+��r`cr SCHEDULE A Comptiartee ScheduCe I, I, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD I ii. ii On on besote May 7, 1979 i it li I 'Sy JuZy 10, 7979, I11 I . oil Septemben .10, 1979 i' ji I' t. I, �I it �.I I'I I� 'I Ii ill I� li i� i I if li Rehpongent hhaU maize ava-i.CaKe I �I 100 yd as a coven stock pne on the Zandl.iWng anea phopeh- I I Respondent 6haU submit an EnKnee y j -i.ng Report to the Depantment, which � II addne4zes the question o.$ .the Palt 1 360 hequihemen.tb and how they ate�: to be handled. A compliance moniton.iAg con6chence t w.itt be he. -c*• at .the o66.ieeh oa the .I L the Town has Depantment o l Env.i_honmenta-C Cons e k- V ati.(_ U f1 -i -.- 0�ti--. ehminc & ll � it e; I met .the tens o and condktiom c6 CompWance Schedule, Schedute A. 14I r (;ew York Stale uapadrrent of Conservation BLDG. . 40, SUVy, S'i`oi y BR003<, ,\;y 11794 ��•irf A. ;�. I;�•rn�, �:�nunission��r March 22, 1978 tier . Ra�vm-ond Dean of 'Highways `:o•, -,n of Southold IML -2-n :;cad 5rD-L,'hold, _Neto York - 1iy71 SOL:iD WAS -TE ;1.ANAGE,-M, E T PER: 1T _ APPLIC-TIO? NO. 52-5-17 D`ar Mr. Dean: A'-ti:ougiz it is understood that t" -,e Town of Southold ;ti -1 51U,iMit a more detailed Solid haste Facility plsn conforr:,ing to the guidelines and until doing so, the a'-,;jlicaticn is into-miolete, I reel it is appropriate to highlight -,chat the final plan shculd contain. A plan for monitoring c;roundv:ater, up and down gradient of the landfill. The monitoring should conform to Section 3.3 Criteria, and include baseline, and routine water sample analysis. A detailed plan for z,ethane monitoring and control. 3). A final siue and land use plan rcrlectir.g the requirer.ents of Sections 3.1.0 and 3.2•.C. :March 22, 1978 To,•:; -i c)f Southold Pi-�GE II 4). In regard to your application to operate, I have a specific question, regarding the imoervicus liner ;mentioned in Item 20. Is this liner natural or ;rare -;jade? In either case describe the n-tateria1 in the liner. Sincerely yours, L Paul Lappano F,sst. Sanitary Lngr. r cc: JPaul Grosser, SCDH Mr. John �owers, H2M a of A,arch 22, 1978 Mr. Rayn;ond Dean Superintendent of Highways Town of Southold Main Poad Southold, -Now Boric 11971 SOLID -n: SOUTHOLD - - � 52-S-17 -_-�=G i=: C:.cCi Gr -•i;;:iey Gr er .. a;-,, i a: �G C::G '�=.'c?I; O; E ATTAC:rED LETTER. .C. _ i:G:..: --. .r•:::.i i\: �? r = v C,: Of Com_✓.- ` "- y ^ is Gc ES=�for :Gu to �..�.L a�n,ic. _G.^.f 1 De= -:Ls . . L�. t .. �iE..e ....t__r �.7C �E?_...�_ aCellt c..EC'�S�• . LC_Gw to G_sw usJ `,O Lf `r�C: :OL;r �. �_ __.__�G i _moi .Je �::: ii :.i l�i-r r. •:1 ..Ci._ _`.. t. h.; i:7i `1 Ac: -..-_ L..LL ._� _.J�v _..;•�l._Ji1� C.�..... �. C:l.� ...+: - viii 1CC. PAUL LAPPANO _ (516) 751-7906 x:23' To: Dave r;irenius O bi l l Slade =te: &/11/77 ;;rjcr_t: Southold Town Landfill unclosed herewith please find copies of all my correspondence with the ,;n of Southold concerning their landfill. e following is a chronlogival reporting of events of therecent months.: }I conddcte_d an inspection on 4/1/77. Piles of potatoes near the scavenger xggons were infested with flys. Also, the area near the north fence where .el l s '.:ere piled was also infested with flys. tI conducted an inspection on 5/20/77. The situation with theflys near 4�e scavenger lagoons had deteriorated, even though the equipment with ich to remedy the situation was sitting at the site --namely, a large tfloader with landfill tires. I advised Mr. Dean on 5/23/77 that the ituation should be corredted as soon as possible. }A reinspection on 5/27/77 showed no imptovement in the fly situation icept that the potaotes, she;ls, and dead fish had been -pushed around j, the bulldozer. The odor at that time was incredible and very widespread. telephone conference with Mr. Dean revealed that his machine was being ierhauled in Harrison, NY and that his backup machine had a "blown" engine. A reinspection of the premises by. Bill Amberman the week of June 6 tvealed no change in the situation. } I conducted an inspection on 6/16/77. The situation remained retty much unchanged, except that the bulldozer had managed to compact ,eof the refuse near the scavenger pit. �A reinspection of the premises on 7/77/7 revealed that the situation id improved slightly. The area just east of the scavemnger pit had ::e cover on it, but the household area east of teh attendant's but is still uncovered. In a telephone conference with Mr. Dean on ghat lUrOWO afternoon, I learned that the machine will be returned to lemon July 15. Mr. Dean also promised to attempt to get some cover ►that uncovered area during the week of 7/11/77. Dece-mber 22, 1976 The Honorable .filbert !d. Martocchia Supervisor, :own of Southold 16 South Street Greenport, IIy 11944 Dear 1-jr. l,artocchia: I am in receipt of your letter of Deceth-er 9, 1976 concerning approval of the cost to install methane monitoring wells (�50 per well) ax�,,Tid r;ie Southold landfill site. i -is per the :;olzMacher findings, we agree thst a rionitoring system is necessary. Such a program should co, -uv nce F-ith t e instsllat ion of a gas well .Monitoring system and the sub- sequent 3,onitcrir19 of tie wel? s on a routine basis. At the present time, the Department of Environmental Control :eels that a networl: of j -.ells spaced approximately 300 ft. on cer;tc:r is a sufficient n: thane aas monitoring system. 1 :ave enclosed a roup slioi; iii t , .- wellso g ��e terltative locations of 15 _iie wells can be installed as soon as the town receives the materials (also enclosed please find a list of materials needed and suggested suppliers). Khen the well installation is complete, a monitoring rust be instituted. TO acc=-Plish this, it is recommended that the town investigate using a methane gas detection meter. Further inforMation on this meter can be obtained by calling ter. John Soderberg (234-2622, Ext. 252) of this de- partment's Air Pollution Control Section. Please advise me as soon as you have the well materials on hand so we may commence with installation® If you require additional information, please.contact me. VEry truly yours,_ Richard Markel, P.E. Asst. Sanitary Engineer P.Vjb Enclosures (2 ) cc ter. Morris Erucrman, P.E. , P''SDEC Mr. Joan Soderberg, P.E., SCDEC MINN K} tyji Y P ktiWr... h+.ldili►..'y" 'r'."'f'.,�.h. .:, '.c. �� se.._:r r. v. .. _ ._ .. ...� list PICT t.t„1,�:j'�,.3„f?i:`il4lFJ .:s.�r+...s. "9'' - _ .i. it . /.•w-T��.. r' £ -'.�.-'`` II- � - 1_���� o m` - •� l • � f / . LI! 36 22 /l/ Duck}'-'.�” ac- j \ n• _ ` J7 vp1, \ 1• Q — / P int.*. -*;.-------.—. c-- ../;' _50 v\ \ _e -/ 'n°c, Of 7so �� _ 5 56 / le • • s �: �" - \ Baa \ ,i ,�r r o \ ' \ ```•'✓\. ° \ /J /�/� � \ moo, 'oT.� -_� -\ \)' F* •�• � Q� �, (°��' .t -'� 90.J .\ O � g rJ '� 'p0 f \ J\•\.' 1' 56 �-' ,f t ' �`� oio a \�/ '1\�._ �•\k° / \ A ;� ((iQ 11 CO. U rt aC.1'1dA 3�a _ 0 f \1 "`�1 �' , V \tio l 1j ' 0•�W. `'o iYe So�W- -'i r, � o\' � C \�\`/ �o•• \� \. ,,f® .rat bf�r'rtf �L�% \'..• 7��`,�/ '(�f, � ��St�, i � o l •� � W T t,\ V i �%,�`` �\ � 1 � t.P ��\ �'� � �iYie PYaKch�'�'J 4�\,,l _ � •�? �, � 1' � '•• � .y� � �' r�Yr .h� ' x �y,� • \ �. ' i' 3'70 •.` Cl� \ '� y;y \� `C ��� , • 'ti WO ,yc f3rrde Nathso 71 D"w9c , a . \ .o (�.y•_ /�f Jli VI �y L�l :'• ° _EUO p 6 J 30 CBM'ao tC�6$ r4,! 'i)l•'� i ��}� - Gj 1, 7 7� °r . /A ��' Sacred, cart O\ �•cs?�Wrf'cP - ��;��t 1� I• t Cem, b `\`\\\\ � ,,o >- � � - � \ (� q�°ate � ' � � ;�`Z:. •24 � \ _,�::= � I I f 19 40 Cutcho gue / , • , ° a. • t r 1 , o' I) ` 00� •o 's•" / !(\ / �4 \ • oo . �V l.• \ .\ 33 4 27 �•' `o .r . t' (\ ) ,' Cutehoiitle.; Po v. Waterville o 4Orl `� `r.•i o �; ,8M 32..- p • 1011. f �4 ••',`�Li / \ �� r". •' ��0,�.> i I. //� . O(kA t 1: . < 1 '� +� L 41 ft! it I'll' `^' d i \ \ \ SU \• :. `r,• Q.1 1�' i"i x.24 f\ ("o - \ `y �1' `:: \\ I ,. • __ _ —_-___ _ ____ 1 � ,wr 14-01 Preparcd in cc)oljcraji()jj will, the SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AU-MOR_I-I and SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF FNVIRnNAAPN Alf, '011 4 4v sof, So;o '36 !re, CA S, &;IC41S 0 wr ITO eac"� 11 I k 60— t,.,a CA )v All? 60 /L S 0 fe IVEW vz�' �ur j 6 of 0)?k - ea 120 sof, lot/ -o 4. -.Plea 120 "It are, yo :.w -.16 "C'Ply �j 1P ------ rip" 44�/, JQ V. it l Yo 4A"�' y s IL . - . I \ , , 11 , 1� "30 LI 0e. sua 70oJglp 71 YTl Mfr'' IS" �P w-_ J, '40 tr- C. Y tl vvi .7-j) 16 -M -N qF b,,V�,.v IV 4ch. A*t r 4 (4c . - �,, 7 . l/ -�,• y / I i ) 4q- 40, .. P,.v •J>,, A-V Po'e. lb", 40, •'14 iAog 1/4 Nl ()9 0,-,.- lift V Iwo, 114, log Yoerp A7 Ru A' E)'Jos .-I 40r09 4or 'Vor jP "Ole 01", qr . 1'94 4 21-1 I? about 40 mgJ to / population that has been increasing rapidly since the end ur World War II. The greatest increases in population and ground -water pumpage have been in the western part of the county. Before about 1960, wells tapping the upper glacial aquifer supplied nearly all the water used in Suffolk County. Since then,pumpage from the Magothy aquifer has increased, and in 1970,the wells tapping the Magothy aquifer supplied about one-third the water used. (See map showing areal distri- bution of major pumpage by aquifer 1970.) CHANGES OF GROUND WATER IN STORAGE An area of about 140 square miles in west -central Suffolk County is underlain .by about 4.5 trillion gallons of fresh water (Soren, 1971a, p. 20). By extrapolation, the total fresh ground water beneath all the county is probably 4 to 5 times this volutne. Withdrawals of ground water have caused the water table in some parts of the county to decline as much as 25 feet from earliest known levels in 1903 (map showing net change in the position of the water table) and have probably caused a small regional but generally undetected landward advance of salty ground water. The decline of the water table reflects a loss of 60 to 80 billion gallons of fresh water from the ground -water reservoir between 1903 and 1971. However, this loss of ground water from storage is less than 1 percent of the total ground water in storage in Suffolk County. SELECTED REFERENCES Cohen, Philip, Franke, O.L., and Foxworthy, B.L., 1968, An atlas of Long Island's water resources: New York Water Resources Comm. I Bull. 62, 117 p. 1970, Water for the future of Long Island, New York: New York State Dept. Environmental Conserv. Water Resources Bull. 62A, 36 p. Cohen, Philip, Franke, O.L., and McClymonds, N.E., 1969, Hydrologic effects of the 1962-66 drought on Long Island, New York: U.S. Geol. Survey Water -Supply Paper 1879-F, 18 p. Cohen, Philip, Vaupel, D.E., and McClymonds, N.E., 1971, Detergents in the streamflow of Suffolk County, Long Island, New York, in Geological Survey Research, 1971: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 750-0, p. C210—C214. Collins, M -.A., Gelhar, L.W., 1970, Ground -water hydrology of the Long Island aquifer system: Mass. Inst. Techno- loan, Hydrodynamics Lab. Rept. no. 122, 185 p. Lloyd EXPLANATION aquifer 0.2 APPROXIMATE AREAL CENTER OF MAJOR GROUND -WATER PUMPING AND SOURCE 6.g 5.0 AQUIFERS — Diameter of circle is propor- tional to pumpage; number is average daily Magothy pumpage, in million gallons per day aquifer Upper glacial aquifer p I rLA Z J FP 200' SEA LEVEL 400' 800' 1200' 1600' f 11 10 O .. poo • - - _ P.e ).• P. � fA *Mbil V,N �V1 O]V tl1 N1 g 4/4 IS QIq Wig`` ti�4os '•4 nips%/ice yg• i 'D/O Oar S o,.v i odd` �o e, •�\ GPo' Nor .pU° q W c U O mO C o m C ti O 08 i E o- ° C� _ = O = L° =� Fi j g °C o 400' T d g ¢ m C v 8 i E E, SEA Q NF d M v v E F®- 400' LEVEL e� ppef`=ial aquifer ` Shore cres O �1 9 Gree port ---'-- SEA 4W, GardinM Monmouth greensand Gardiners Clay \ ( Clay Upper glacial aquifer LEVEL -� Monmouth gfeensand----�— Magothy aquiferT� 400' 800' 800' y _ � — --r-� _ --- Rarity n clay -� Raritan clay _ . __�---�-- J 800' 1200' — —�— LIOya agVP�'. 87 ,�r� Lloyd aquil ...,.: d Bedrock 1200' 1600, Bedrock lsoo' 1600' Z J FP 200' SEA LEVEL 400' 800' 1200' 1600' f 11 10 O .. poo • - - _ P.e ).• P. � fA *Mbil V,N �V1 O]V tl1 N1 g 4/4 IS QIq Wig`` ti�4os '•4 nips%/ice yg• i 'D/O Oar S o,.v i odd` �o e, •�\ GPo' Nor .pU° W c O m C O 08 i E o- ° ai Q ti = L° =� L OE E « v cc F� r �►" u M 200' � v E SEA LEVEL e� ppef`=ial aquifer ` i `� 9 Gree port � 400• Gardiners Clay --- -� Monmouth gfeensand----�— Magothy aquifer —�� 800' y _ --- Rarity n clay 1200' _ — —�— LIOya agVP�'. Bedrock lsoo' Z J FP 200' SEA LEVEL 400' 800' 1200' 1600' f 11 10 O .. poo • - - _ P.e ).• P. � fA *Mbil V,N �V1 O]V tl1 N1 g 4/4 IS QIq Wig`` ti�4os '•4 nips%/ice yg• i 'D/O Oar S o,.v i odd` �o e, •�\ GPo' Nor .pU° Hydrogeologicmate Approxi- unit' thickness Description and water -bearing properties Geologic unit (feet) Shore, beach, salt -marsh Beach sand and gravel and dune sand, tan, brown, and white and black, brown, and gray bay -bottom deposits, and 0-60 deposits deposits of clay and silt. Beach and dune deposits in shore areas contain thin lenses of fresh water artificial fill by salty ground water. Clay and silt in bay bottoms tend to confine water in underlying strata. Till; includes Clay, silt, sand, gravel, and boulders, tan, brown, and brownish -gray. Deposits are commonly unsorted terminal-, ground-, and ablation -moraine Upper 0-150 and unstratified but can also include crudely to well sorted and stratified glacial drift. Deposits lie deposits chiefly above water table and are not an important source of ground water. Hydraulic conductivity glacial is very low to moderate. Clayey till causes local perched ground -water bodies. Lecustrine deposits consist chiefly of clay a A silt, brown, brownish -gray, and gray. These beds occur Lacustrine and at many places in the northern part of the county, chiefly in the Smithtown area where they have marine deposits 0-300 been referred to as the "Smithtown clay." Marine beds of gray -green clay and silt occur at shallow depths in shoreline areas. Hydraulic conductivity is generally very low. Not a source of ground water. aquifer Deposits serve chiefly to confine water 16 underlying strata. Stratified fine to coarse sand and gravel, light- to dark -brown, tan, and yellowish -brown. Hydraulic con- ductivity of outwash is usually high, estimated to be as much as 200 feet per day. Wells screened in outwash deposits yield as much as 2,000 gallons per minute and have specific capacities that are Outwash deposits O-350 usually more than 50 gallons per minutm per foot of drawdown in the well. Deposits generally contain water under water -table conditions. The Mannetto Gravel of Pliocene(?) age (below) is included with these deposits because of lithologic resemblance and physical continuity. Mannetto beds lie above the water table and are not a source of water. UNCONFORMITY Gardiners Clay Gardiners Clay 0-75 Marine deposits of clay and silt with some interbedded sand and gravel; greenish -gray and gray. Depos- its have low hydraulic conductivity and confine water in underlying strata. Unit occurs mainly along southshore area. See "upper glacial Mannetto Gravel aquifer, outwash 0-125 See "outwash deposits," above. deposits," above Monmouth Group Monmouth Interbedded marine deposits of clay, silt, and sand, dark -greenish -gray, greenish -black, greenish, dark- greensands a �0 gray, and black, containing much glauconite and lignite. Unit has low hydraulic conductivity and confines water in underlying Magothy aquifer in southshore area. — UNCONFORMlTY Deposits consist of gray to white fine to coarse sand with interstitial clay, silt, and lignite, interbedded with lenses and thin to thick beds of light- to dark -gray clay, silt, and clayey and silty sand, and lam- Group inae and thin beds of lignite and pyrite. Basal 100 to 200 feet is generally composed of coarse sand Magothyvlatawan Formation Magothy g y 0-1,000 and gravel beds. Commonly with much interstitial clay and silt, interbedded with strata similar to undifferentiated undifferentiated aquifer those in upper rt. Hydraulic conductivity of unit varies wide) but is estimated to average about PPe Pa Y V V 70 feet per day. Wells screened in the Magothy aquifer yield as much as 1,500 gallons per minute, and they have specific capacities that are usually less than 50 gallons per minute per foot of draw- down in the well. Water in the aquifer is poorly to well confined; confinement is greatest near south shore where unit is overlain by Monmouth greensand and Gardiners Clay. V EXPLANATION --500— APPROXIMATE BEDROCK CONTOUR Shows altitude of bedrock surface. Dashed where inferred. Contour inten 100 feet. Datum is mean sea level o- . I lSh j., 4"", ' 'o 7- kit, -V IV 4, vF- ---Irtj vV IOW"(, bry '^he w l0 b d" R, LoNj)ON v� C ",--2 i" Sri " V, -6,00 i'd ko 300.1 I/o, j olq lb 5\ 0 Is _00 1,3 7 F600 4- --,7 00 - I.. l.v I -j-100 3 k4o Al -900 1 4 .?00 V At 4.Jay 10L 6 sir 1 50u_ C 0 -1700-%& 1.20G lo r �w .1,;Z90 41 Note: Location of control point on Plate 1 in Jansen and Son MAP SHOWING CONFIGURATION OF THE BEDROCK q1IRIZAd-lp r ---=F— -- - I� 1J � o ,. ,t", 1 �i •n,,+*' '•� �ta`ht�r•, ,.y ,�..,, I d�/ ` I r i ti, b '"`° by /� 'reap' . ° 1 ~+ •; ,.y' /' , •...,.`r' \, .'tea. •' _ i` � .e,° by b b ra 1 �� e "•.° "•'Oi.° • • � �/• • 11 Av ° r. y • � ! •` .f ;i I n khbi ,T. °" - _ •,, `.___ ���. %�' .'�.'" .' ,•,r.9/ .,,. r . .r � !u ,. n„n. - - � /rq �1t' ^ry'• .±, r.• •; '' '7 .� Fp,F�;K � 7•'J,•+f�''•°'.y'..,(,, �. ! -`t ... ,./ 'ii, r� �/A, •.�, �.'� I ,r •n. �^_U`� ;�, /_'�t/7'� ,,,1 �,,,,, '•e,,;•�t^ t\I'•+� )s '`,eC,r,=,” `•,��' �.'/,• Ilf f, r� y _/�' ° o. e' , "r, .e,. ��� I,/>1 I(" � . n 1� ;. '' • � (' ,li I^ .. ° y','.r:. ��',i '.° `b !,. '/ ry' 4t /re' �� o(,+;L, '~• o"'*ie'x�' l)I• ..,a,,° •1� �'•• !,, y'i N- •,r, •M, 4,,,L• '��/, i � • `� . ,1, � , y. � p..r,o y.,y `b'tr � ' '�•� "�� .' •,J �. �•. ��''�•, ... �y�`�'J'.• � 1 '4,x70 }/ t .K • �' ,G,4;,;''ll�l ti�'" !` • '/' • / � �y / QR '� ti! + +•. I �1+: S� : r •,. 'd',, I , ';', •�` � .. 70 ol -- rv1/C f/.,,,,h.vl/r, y +�nj •44 '.• ' A , �1.' ,,� ��''.;f ,�..r..,^^ .��\� •i .V ti�.:. t, t�', ; .. MAP SHOWING ALTITUDE OF WATER TABLE, SPRING 1971 11 ) d iAdaptrd In hart 1111. Km,—J, 1971, 7� r t w, I km. n� Y SL t %L . .... p/ �vNkj % 4 j; .� l` , -•%� +�° � v�! r r�i .'rjj'. .1•:.\• ..,a '4 f1 •, C•Y qz' Al,Y` v t, r '�;'(t !r=t'{1r—:6'M4 -;`en•-'��• G'' ' •W . btJ •'' 1� • J ... ..... .... .... F10 IrYDROLOGY AND SOME EFFECTS OF URBANIZATION ON LONG ISLAND, NEW TORN underlain by terminal -moraine deposits, the depth to the water table is more than 50 feet, and in small areas the depth to the water table is more than 200 feet. Depths to the water table near the northern coast of the island generally are more than 20 feet, except adjacent to stream channels or in narrow bands near the shoreline. GROUND -WATER RESERVOIR HYDROLOGIC FEATURES OF THE GROUND -WATER RESERVOIR The overall hydrogeologic setting of Long Island was described in considerable detail by Veatch (1906), Fuller (1914), and Suter, De Laguna, and Perlmutter (1949). The geology and related hydrology of several smaller areas of Long Island have been studied in greater detail by others, including De Laguna (1963), Isbister (1966), Lubke (1964), Lusczynski and Swar- zenski (1966), Perlmutter and Geraghty (1963), Pluhowski and Kantrowitz (1964), and Swarzenski (1963). Long Island is underlain by consolidated bedrock, which, in turn, is overlain by a wedge-shaped mass of unconsolidated rock materials (fig. 8).' These mate- rials, which constitute Long Island's ground -water reservoir, consist primarily of it series of Pleistocene glacial deposits and Cretaceous fluvial or deltaic depos- its composed of gravel; sand, silt, clay, and mixtures thereof. The Cretaceous deposits were eroded by 'The actual dip of the upper bedrock surface is alightly less than 1• to the southeast. The much greater inclination of the bedrock surface and the Magothy aquifer shorn In figure 8 Is due to the large vertical - scale exaggeration of this cross section. Z 1>: 01z NORTH 01 LONG ISLAND m t SOUTH LONG ISLAND711 ..:®:: • �s : • 101 a d ATLANTIC SOUND �•.•. •.o.:o U.• ®. m .a::;:: e : ° :;; :•;�:.-•...;.®. ... • pper glacial a' u, p.... « Bay OCEAN :.. O . p ..'. , ..ail •. • • ''::: �: • '. • :.O :.:.7,• !i • �, ,, �• ..• :9.�:..• '�' \�\�� :.o .i. '.l.. i::t�, :�• ..., ice., Upper acia ..�.��. .®•.•e �rdin 9 and undifferentiate .e \: ..� ', \� . ��' \ \ . /a erg Ca deposits b `�'. ����. • .���• \ Oaq er :o. °; �:•'. • Magothy aquile'r;—< b. • a9v�f�r aritan c/ay : o � o Not to scale <►. EXPLANATION Clay Sandy clay, clayey sand,and silt Sand O • .o O � Gravel [L1LGlLLLCl1a Consolidated rock Fmtraa 8—Geologic features of the ground -water reserrolr. b StJDfMARY OF HYDROLOGIO SITU UN AS A GUIDE TO NATER-UAIAGEll L ALTER\ATIVES lilt as and glaciers so that. the Pleistocene deposits Major features of this map are the two areas of in irregular Cretaceous surface, and in places highest ground -water altitude (represented by closed f�istocene deposits fill valleys cut by preglacial 80 -ft and 60 -ft contours) which extend approximately ,,ficial streams. These valleys have been fairly westward in the north -central parts of Nassau and -;pined in Kings and Queens Counties and along Suffolk Counties. Also noteworthy are the steep water- wrthern margin of the island eastward to the level gradients near the north shore of Long Island pe of Suffolk County. In eastern Suffolk County, compared to the gradients near the south shore. data on the contact between the Pleistocene The water table, which is the upper boundary of ' fie, Cretaceous are very sparse` the ground -water reservoir, is a dynamic (moveable) upper surface of the Cretaceous deposits is feature. Present information indicates that recharge to ;es level in a large area in northern Nassau and the water tableoccurs throughout virtually all of °n Suffolk Counties, and in all but a few small Long Island. Therefore, the water table is not, from the Pleistocene deposits cover the Cretaceous the point of view of potential theory, a stream sur- �. u throughout Long Island. Pertinent informa- face. It is instead a surface characterized by a con- :rncerning the principal hydrogeologic units stantly varying potential which is equal to the altitude the ground -water reservoir are briefly sum- of the water table at any point. Because the water in table 2. table on Long Island is largely a recharging potential 4ad water in the uppermost part of the zone boundary of the ground -water reservior, streamlines antion on. Long Island (mainly in the, upper i flow perpendicularly from the wAter;,table into the d aquifer, but locally also in the Aiagothy ground -water reservoir. Locally, as near the shorelines .r) is generally under water -table conditions. where ground water is lost by evapotranspiration, the 4a conditions predominate in most of the other water table is a discharging potential boundary. of the ground -water reservoir of Long Island, The ground -water reservoir is bordered laterally by `the saturated deposits are overlain and confined a second moveable boundary—the fresh -At water inter- tj and clayey layers of low hydraulic condue- face. The position of this interface (or these interfaces) The hydraulic head in the confined aquifers is fairly accurately known only in soutuwestern Nassau I from several feet below the water table to and southeastern Queens Counties as a result of an 20 feet above it. At places along the north and intensive investigation by Lusczynsld and Swarzenski wores and on the barrier beaches, the head in (1966). A north -south crass section through the ground - bpd aquifer is high enough to cause some wells water reservoir in this area (fig. 10) shows three sep- Pmetrate this aquifer to flow. , - arate salt -water wedges --a shallow wedge in the glacial ddition to the Raritan clay, which confines water aquifer and intermediate and deep wedges in the Lloyd aquifer, the other major well-defined Magothy aquifer. Furthermore, a fourth wedge exists ag layer in the ground -water reservoir is the in the Lloyd aquifer somewhere seaward of the barrier its Clay. This unit locally confines water in beaches. xxo and -Afagothy aquifers. Numerous clayey The occurrence of fresh ground water in the Lloyd "ZY layers in the 31agothy aquifer and clay aquifer below salty ground water in the lower part 3 the glacial deposits also are significant con- of the Afagothy aquifer has never been adequately 4Prs, Normally, the degree of confinement in explained. However, this occurrence must be related 19'thY aquifer increases with depth as more in some way to the relatively impermeable Raritan "a clayey layers intervene between the deep clay overlying the Lloyd aquifer. At least four sep- 14 the water table- erste wedges of salty ground water with relative Positions approximately as indicated in figure 10 prob- ably occur for a considerable distance eastward from western Nassau County (on the order of tens of miles) along the south shore of Long Island. Very scanty information indicates that the Lloyd aquifer and the deep Magothy aquifer contain salty ground water beneath the Forks of Long Island. The fresh ground water beneath the Forks occurs in a lens ranging in thickness from a few feet to several hundred feet. _"-3 OF THE FRESH ORouxD-WATER RESERVOIR �04ndaries of the fresh ground -water reservoir ;Rater table, the fresh -salt water interface, and ttock surfaCe. The estimated average position Rater table under natural conditions is shown 9. The position of the contours is based on Of the water table in Kings, Queens, and es in 1803 (prepared by Veatch in 1906), later water -table maps of Suffolk County. U 0 HYDROLOGY AND SOME EFFECTS OF URBANIZATION ON LONG ISLAND, NEW TORR TABLE 2,—Summary of the rock units and their water -bearing properlies, Long island, N. Y. (After McCiymonds and Franke, 1971) system Series Holocene Geologic unit Hydro- geologic Approxi- mate Depth from —Unconformltyt— unit maximum thickness land surface Character of deposits —Unconformltyl— (feet) to top (feet) Artificial salt Holocene Tertiarp(7) Pliocene(?) Mannetto GravelIncluded (Commonly deposits, mash dlluviu stream alluvium, deposit —Unconformity—aquifer.) 0 Sand, gravel, clay, silt, organic mud, and shoreline deposits. Magothy Formation Magothy 1,100 Deaf. loam• and shells. Colon are graY, brown, green, black, and Bellow. Holocene wI ficial -fill depositof gravel, sand, clay, and rubbish. Upper Pleistocene I Upper glacled I a00 deposit aquifer Quaternary Pleistocene —Unconformltyt— Gardlnen Clay Gardlnen 300 Clay —Unconformltyl— Jamecu Gravel Jamern aquifer —Unconformlty— Tertiarp(7) Pliocene(?) Mannetto GravelIncluded (Commonly with upper 300 glacial —Unconformity—aquifer.) Cretaceous Magothy Formation Magothy 1,100 aquifer Rater-besring Properties I Permeable zanily beds beneath barrio beaches yield fresh water at shLBOW depths, brackish to salty rate! a greater depth. Clay and silt tWer r bay's retard salt -water encroacb=,w and confine underlying agtrrfm Stream-Good-plaln and mash de pWaterosit, but Yield small grtanciea*I silty and much fu eenerally e,.. -y er d Permeate t� un erlying upper giacial Maifer. Till (Mostly alonp nortOf clay. sandh shore and to T� Doody permeable; eoz,=off Mvel, and boullcomposed Forms Harbor Perched-we4r Hill and Ronkonkoma terminal ' Impedes downward percoILZM aa, moraines. water to underlying beds. Outwash deposits (Mostly Outwash deposit are moderately to and south of terminal yzn,) between I highly permeable; specific aP�tin but also Interls--i with — , . of tvells tapping them range f:on consist of quartzose sand. ) abt:ut 10 to more tban 20 rpm p,w very coarse, and gravel, pebble to foot of drawdown. Good to ezctiil� boulder sized. infiltration characteristics. 4 60 G1aclolacustrine deposit (mostly in I Gl i4lacustrine and msrine C!ay antral and eastern Lon Lland Posits aremoetlylr�otiyper�sb� and marine clay (locally along ) but locally have thin mody Shore) consist of silt, clay, and some I Permeable layers of sand and privet send and gravel layers; Includes '--V. generally eo�era lOf rond retard t. downwardp foot clay" In southern Nassau Contains fresh water, exc*pt nest. the County and Queens County, Colors are maWy gray, brown, and shorelines. Till and s3er depoVq Yellow; silt and clay locally are I menti retard salt -water eneoacb Containaiss Shells and plant remains, generally in finer grained beds; also contatrts Foraminifera. Contains chlorite, biotite, muscovite, hornblende, olivine, and feldspar as accessfoot clay., commonly minerals;ry y containsglauconite. Clay. Silt, and few layers of sand and I Poorly permeable; constitutes con,'aicg gravel. Colors are grayish green and brown. layer for underlying Ja nern agnifer. Contains marine shells, Foraminifera, I Locally, sand layers yield s=sg and lignite; also glauconite, locally, quantities of water, 54-/00 Altitude of top generally is 50-Fo ft below mean a level. Occurs In Kings and Queens CountiesI southern Nassau County , , aad I Suffolk County; simlar lc In burled valleys near northlay occurs short, Sand, fine to verycoarse carve, and gravel to largrpebble size; few layers of clay and silt. Gravel t composed of Moderately to bight 54 550 Coloryr t mostly dart sedimentary brown.�� contains mostly fresh w�mr, glut Cr.atalns chlorite, bintite, muscovite, brackish water and wa et. with .fit hornblende, and feldspar as acces- L -on content locally in southesexa sort' minerals. Nassau County and southern Q n!!n1 Occurs fn Tiir[gs turd Queers Counties, Ca[n[p, Specific capacttles of his and southern Nassau Coun In the Jameco range Irom about 3) to 3IlMn r de ry; ISO gPm per foot of drawdown. valleys n Its shore. In buried I Gravel, fine to coarse, and lenses of Sand; scattered claq lenses. 4 120 Colors are white, Yellow, and brown. Highly wate tablebExcell inmfi� Occursonly near Nassau -Suffolk tion characteristics. County border near center of island. Sainterbedded nd, fine to medium, clayey in part; Most Icyers are 01 coarse sand and lSandy andenses and rwlid I We leable; some erre highly to �e� 7 Y• Specific ca Perms clay, Gravel Is common In Baal In the \la oth 1'sciri`sotarb 50-200 ft. Sand and gravel are 6 y ge9eral c range f. quartzose. Lignite, pyrite, and Iron 1 to about 30 gent per foot of drsw- oxlde concretions are common; ' dow-n, rarely are as Much as So F,= 4000 Bartt et are rtite, rutile, and mostt putts r is elsew•herenis con D� Colors ere accessory minerals. Water ls generally of excellent qui.y gray, white, red, brown, I but has hl h Iron content Io- -long v and yellow, p along north and south shares_ Comtltutes principal an 1s Iub"e-suPPly wells In western Lor; Island, except Kings County w'.:re It is mostly absent. yfas Genn invy.ed by salty -ground water locally 13 southwestern Nassau County &-rI southern Queens County, sad '3 IMWI areas along north short. v SUMMARY OF IIYDROLOGIO SITUATION AS A GUIDE TO WATFIt-\IANAG FMENT ALTEIINATIVES F13 TABLE 2.—Sunintary of the roCk- units and their foater-bcaring properties, Long Island, N.Y.—Continued Approxi- Depth lrydro- mite from =„a Series Geologic unit geologic maximum land Character of deposits Water-bearin unit thickness surface g properties (feet) (feet] Uper Cretaceous Raritan Clay mem- ben Raritan clay 300 7G-1. 500 Clay, solid end silty; few lenses and layers of sand; little gravel. Lignite and pyrite are common. Colors are gray, red, and while, commonly variegated. Poorly to very poorly permeable; Constitutes confining layer for under. lying Lloyd aquifer. Very few wells produce appreciable water from these deposits. Forma- Forms - tion Sand, fine to coarse, and gravel, Commpnly with clayey matrix; some Poorly to moderatel S y Permeable. of wells In the lenses and layers of solid and silt y Clay; Contains thin lignite layers LI ydgennettll rs S T age from 1 to about Lloyd Sand Member Lloyd aquifer 500 200-1,800 and Iron Concretions locally. Locally, has gradational contact with overlying 26 Qpm per (opt of drawdown, rarely are as much as 60 gpm pas ft. Water is confined under artesian Raritan clay. Sand and most of pressure by overlying Raritan cls y' generally of gravel are quartzose. Colors are yellow, gmy, and white; excellent quality but has high Iron Content locally. Has been invaded by I - ! 4.7 is red locally. salty ground water locally In necks near north shore,' wheie aquifer is mosUy shallow and overlying clay dfacontinuous. Called deep confined —Unconformlty-- aquifer In some earlier reports. Crystalline metamorphic and igneous Poorly permeable to virtually im- rocks; muscovite-blotits schist, permeable; constitutes virtually the Bedrock Bedrock gneiss, and granite. A soft clayey lower boundary of round -water ----------- 0-2.700 zone of weathered bedrock locally Is reservoir. Some hard, fresh water is more than 100 it thick. contained in Joints and fractures, but U Impracticable to develop at most Places; however, a few wells near the western edges of Queers and Sings Counties obtain water from the bedrock. fresh -salt water interface is not a sharp The fresh -salt water interface is a complex stream- �Iry. The horizontal distance over which the line surface, and fresh ground water discharging into F�Rd-solids content of ground water changes the ocean and bays moves parallel to the interface completely fresh to completely salty is gen- and not across it. The hydrodynamics of a stable on the order of 2-3 thousand feet near the interface and, to an even greater degree, an unstable `hore of Long Island. Over this distance, interface that changes position in response to changes �,Molred-solids content of the ground Rater in head within the ground -water reservoir, is compli- �� at first. gradually in the direction of the cated and beyond the scope of this report. (See [ground water and then more rapidly. Lusczynski, 1961; Cooper, 1964; and Kohout, 1964.) 2p 74'00 45' 30' 15' 73'00' 45' 30' 15' 7700' 71.45' NEW i /CONNECTICUT YORK _ ISI'ANO ,i' yoNc JERSEY G -a ATLANTIC SOLD � 1 1 • l ` 5 r0 EXPLANATION 20 Water -table contour Showa estimated altitude of the nater table under natural conditions. Contour internals or E 5, lo, and 10jert. Datum is can sea It IYI 5 0 5 10 15 20 25 MILES I..., I I I I I I P[G 9. Estimated average position of the water -table under natural conditions. z2,k Appendix C 47-15-II(2/8C) HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL SITES REPORT NEW YOFS STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIR0NMENTAL CONSERVATION Code: Site Code: Name of Site: Southold Landfill Region: County: Suffolk Town/City. Cutchogue Street address North Road Status of Site Narrative: The Southold Landfill has been opeating con- tinuously.since 1951 at North Rd. in Cutchogue, NY. This facility accepts municipal and domestic wastes, demolition and landscaping debris, and cesspool and septic tank wastes. The Order on Consent dated May 16, 1979, established violations by the landfill operations of part 360 of 6 NYCRR. On August 31, 1981, the landfill was classi- fied as an open dump because it was found to be: (a) -in non-compliance on safety (e-xplosi:kQ gases beyond the --property boundary), 40 CFR part 273.6, and (b) in violation of NYS (6NYCRR Part 703) ground water standards. On January 5, 1982, the Town of Southold which was not yet in compliance with the Order on Consent was contacted by NYSDEC to set up a compliance monitoring conference. , Type of Site: Open Dump Zy Landfill (� Structure [] Estimated Size 41 Acres Pazarcous Wastes Dispcsed? Treatment Fcnd(s) D Number o' _'onds Lagcon(s) Number of Lagoons Confirmed 7 Suspected 0 *'=vre and Quantity cf Hazardous Wastes: TTPE PCB 1260, Iron, Manganese, Chlorides, Copper and Zinc were detected in a well located on site. * Use additional sheets if more space is needed. QUkNT7_7Y (Pounds, drums, tors, gallons) Unknown ' U 1 47-15-11(�/rc) Name of Current 9waer of Site: Town of Southold Address of Current Owner of Site: Main Road Southold NY 11958 Time Period Site Was Used for Hazardous Waste Disposal: 19 51 To Present 19 85 Is site Active Inactive (Site is inactive ifhazardous wastes dispose was closed prior to August 25, 1979) p d of at this site and site Types of Samples: Air Q Groundwater j$T Surface Water L] Soil Q None Q Remedial Action: Proposed Q Under Design = Nature In Progress Q of Action: .Completed Q Status of Legal Action: Order on Consent Permits Issued: Federal G Sta'e Federal Solid Waste Local Government Q SPJES ,Q Mined Land Q Assessment of -Envi wetlands Q Other r- ronmental Problems: Since PCB 1260, Iron, Manganese, Co per an on site well, and also because some parameterssuch nrasdetected chlorideSn an (270 mg/1) , colo'r (30) and TDS (1500 m maximum values allowed; g/1) were in excess of the the potential exists for this contamination to reach drinking water supplies. TWO domestic wells are locate approximately 400 ft_ south of the site. d Assessment of Health Problems: Potential for contamination of private drinking water wells located in the vicinity of the site. Persons Completing this Form: Luis Rivas Woodward -Clyde Consultants , Inc. April 5, 1985 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Date 6/3/81 RPM: cl New York State Department of Heal:;