Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPBA-07/06/2015PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PUBLIC MEETING AGENDA JULY 612015 6:00 P.M. SETTING OF THE NEXT PLANNING BOARD MEETING MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 www.southoldtowxniy. gov Board to set Monday, August 3, 2015 at 6:00 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, as the time and place for the next regular Planning Board Meeting. SUBDIVISIONS Conditional Sketch Plat Determinations: Mazzoni 500 Soundview Drive LLC - This proposal is for a Standard Subdivision of a 22.94 acre parcel into 6 lots where Lot 1 = 2.27 acres, Lot 2 = 1.67 acres, Lot 3 = 2.13 acres, Lot 4 = 0.59 acres, Lot 5 = 16.28 acres inclusive of a 1.21 acres right-of-way, 8.58 acres of Open Space and 6 acres of a Conservation Easement held by the Peconic Land Trust (PLT) located in the R-80 Zoning District. The property is located at 500 Soundview Drive, approximately 782' to the north of NYS Route 25 and 256' to the east of Soundview Drive, in Orient. SCTM#1000-13-2-8.2 Martz, Theodore C., Jr. - This proposal is for a Standard Subdivision of a 1.62 acre parcel into two lots where proposed Lot 1 equals 0.71 acres and proposed Lot 2 equals 0.92 acres, located in the R-40 Zoning District. The Zoning Board of Appeals granted an Area Variance to allow for Lot 1 to be less than 40,000 sq. ft. The property is located at 555 Broadwaters Road, on Broadwaters Road approximately 80 feet west of Wunneweta Road, Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-104-12-6.1 Sketch Plat Extensions: Noone, Margaret - This proposal is for a 2 -lot Standard Subdivision of a 21,000 sq. ft. parcel where Lot 1 = 10,501 sq. ft. and Lot 2 = 10,500 sq. ft. in the R-40 & B Zoning Districts. The property is located at 210 Sigsbee Road, on the west side of Sigsbee Road, 164' south of Main Road, Mattituck. SCTM#1000-143-1-4.1 Southold Town Planning Board Pae 2 July 6, 2015 Baxter, William J., Jr. - This proposal is a Standard Subdivision of a 2.38 acre parcel into 4 lots where Lot 1 = 0.62 acres, Lot 2 = 0.63 acres, Lot 3 = 0.62 acres and Lot 4 = 0.52 acres, in the Hamlet Business Zoning District. The property is located at 260 Griffing Street, on the northeast side of Griffing Street, approximately 402 feet west of the Main Road in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-102-5-9.4 Conditional Final Plat Extensions: Aries Estates - This proposal is for a Standard Subdivision of an 11.4 -acre parcel into two lots, where Lot 1 equals 5.7 acres, including 3.3 acres of open space, and Lot 2 equals 5.7 acres, including 3.2 acres of open space, in the R-80 Zoning District. The property is located at 3995 Private Road #1, approximately 334.1' to the east of Stars Road, in East Marion. SCTM#1000-22-3-2 Final Plat Extensions: Sacred Heart Church & Valerioti - This Lot Line Change will transfer 0.48 acres from SCTM#1000-96-5-10 to SCTM#1 000-96-5-12. 1. Lot 12.1 will increase from 35.03 acres to 35.51 acres and Lot 10 will decrease from 1.74 acres to 1.26 acres located in the A- C Zoning District. The properties are located at 3400 & 4200 Depot Lane, on the southwest side of Depot Lane approximately 1,468 feet to the south of Route 48, Cutchogue. SUBDIVISIONS - STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT (SEQRA) Lead Agency: The Orchards - This proposal is for a Clustered Standard Subdivision to subdivide a 13.3 acre parcel into five lots where Lot 1 = 9.33 acres including a 1.35 acre building envelope and 7.98 acres of preserved Open Space, Lot 2 = 0.99 acres, Lot 3 = 1.14 acres, Lot 4 = 0.92 and Lot 5 = 0.92 acres in the R-80 Zoning District. The property is located at 2595 Orchard Street, on the northeast side of Orchard Street, approximately 17' northwest of Platt Road, in Orient. SCTM#1000-27-1-3 Koehler Family Limited Partnership - This proposal is a Clustered Standard Subdivision of a 14.94 acre parcel into eight lots where Lot 1 equals 0.83 acres inclusive of 0.04 acres of unbuildable lands; Lot 2 equals 0.85 acres inclusive of 0.05 acres of unbuildable lands; Lot 3 equals 1.13 acres inclusive of 0.26 acres of unbuildable lands; Lot 4 equals 0.70 acres; Lot 5 equals 0.66 acres; Lot 6 equals 0.70 acres; Lot 7 equals 0.73 acres; and Lot 8 equals 8.72 acres of Open Space and 0.05 acres of unbuildable lands, located in the R-80 Zoning District. This property includes a proposed road totaling 0.54 acres. The property is located at 4180 New Suffolk Avenue, on the corner of Marratooka Road and New Suffolk Avenue, in Mattituck. SCTM#1000- 115-10-1 Southold Town Planning Board Pae 13 jpN 6, 2015 Type Classifications: The Orchards - SCTM#1000-27-1-3. Determinations - Positive Declarations The Orchards - SCTM#1000-27-1-3. Tuthill Conservation Subdivision - This proposal is for an 80/60 Conservation Subdivision of four parcels SCTM#s 1000-17-4-16, 1000-17-6-14.2, 1000-18-3-30.3 and 1000-18-6-17.3 (total area=112 acres) into 17 residential lots, with 94 acres to be preserved. This project proposes the transfer of yield pursuant to §240-42 G of the Southold Town Code. SCTM#1000-17-4-16 (North Dyer) equals 21 acres proposed to be subdivided into 6 lots where the lots range in size from 0.7 - 0.9 acres. This property includes a 0.7 acres private right-of-way and 15.6 acres of preserved subdivision open space inclusive of 5.7 acres of unbuildable lands. North Dyer is located on the n/s/o NYS Route 25, approximately 366 feet west of Oysterponds Lane, in Orient. SCTM#1000-17-6-14.2 (South Dyer) equals 35.3 acres proposed to be subdivided into 5 lots and includes a reserve area for agricultural related use where the lots range in size from 0.5 - 0.9 acres; property includes a 0.5 acre right-of-way and 28.5 acres of open space inclusive of 14.6 acres of unbuildable lands. South Dyer is located on the s/s/o NYS Route 25, approximately 460 feet west of Oysterponds Lane, in Orient. SCTM#1000-18-3-30.3 (North Brown) equals 28.7 acres proposed to be subdivided into 5 lots where the lots range in size from 0.7 - 0.8 acres. This property includes a 1.3 acre private right-of-way and 23.7 acres of open space inclusive of 2 acres of unbuildable lands. North Brown is located on the n/s/o of NYS Route 25, approximately 2,223 east of Platt Road, in Orient. SCTM#1000-18-6-17.3 (South Brown) equals 26.9 acres proposed to be subdivided where Lot 1 equals 0.92 acres. This property includes 25.5 acres of open space inclusive of 0.62 acre of unbuildable lands. South Brown is located on the s/s/o NYS Route 25, approximately 1,960 feet east of Platt Road, in Orient. SITE PLANS Determinations: Creative Courses Catering, LLC - This proposed Site Plan is for the renovation and conversion of an existing 60'x 40'(2,400 sq. ft.) masonry building, formerly a machine shop, to a 16 seat take-out restaurant with six (6) parking stalls on .33 acres in the LB Zoning District. The property is located at 41150 CR 48, ±850' s/w/o CR 48 & Tuckers Lane, Southold. SCTM#1000-59-10-4 Southold Town Planninq Board Pae 14 July 6, 2015 Approval Extensions: Purita Winery - This Site Plan is for the alteration and expansion of existing buildings into a new winery totaling 6,304 sq. ft. which includes 267 sq. ft. of office, 347 sq. ft. of retail, 3,249 sq. ft. of tasting room, 671 sq. ft. of storage area, 1,770 sq. ft. of production area and stone terrace with 25 parking spaces on a 3.7431 -acre parcel in the A -C Zoning District. The property is located on the n/s/o Old North Road, approximately 286 ft. w/o County Road 48, known as 19110 Old North Road, in Southold. SCTM#1000-51- 3-4.11 Set Hearings: A & S Southold Oil Corp, Gas Station C,ano - This amended Site Plan is for the construction of a 1,568 sq. ft. canopy pursuant to ZBA File #6757 to cover the existing fuel pumps on 0.3 acres in the General Business (B) Zoning District. The property is located at 49670 NYS Route 25, on the corner of NYS Rt. 25 & Main Bayview Road, Southold. SCTM#1000-70-7-4 Southold Gas Station & Convenience Store - This amended Site Plan is for the proposed conversion of an existing 3,476 sq. ft. building (formerly for vehicle detailing, RV sales and servicing) to a convenience store and vehicle fuel sales, with: 6 fuel pumps (12 fueling stations), two canopies, one at 50'x 24'(1,200 sq. ft.) and the other at 50' x 50' (2,500 sq. ft.) and 29 parking spaces on 1.46 acres in the General Business (B) Zoning District. The property is located at 45450 CR 48, on the s/w corner of CR 48 and Youngs Avenue, Southold. SCTM#1000-55-5-2.2 SITE PLANS - STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT Classifications: A & S Southold Oil Corp. Gas Station Canopy - SCTM#1000-70-7-4. Southold Gas Station & Convenience Store - SCTM#1000-55-5-2.2. Determinations — Negative Declarations: Mattituck Fire District Telecommunications Facility - This proposed wireless communications Site Plan is to replace an existing ±84' communications tower with a 120' antenna support structure/tower with associated equipment and a generator to be mounted on the roof of the existing firehouse. There are ±14,370 sq. ft. of existing buildings including the main fire house and associated accessory structures, all on 1.38 acres in the Hamlet Business Zoning District. The property is located at 1000 Pike Street, on the s/w corner of Pike Street & Wickham Avenue, Mattituck. SCTM#1000- 140-3-11.1 Southold Town Planning Board Pae 15 July 6, 2015 Berry & Berry, LLC - This proposed Site Plan Application is to convert an existing 1,096 sq. ft. dwelling to a business office and construct a 64' x 40' (2,560 sq. ft.) four bay storage garage pursuant to ZBA File #6818 on 20,419 sq. ft. (0.47 acres) in the General Business (B) Zoning District. The property is located at 41535 NYS Route 25, ±495' s/w/o Peconic Lane & NYS Route 25, Peconic. SCTM#1000-75-5-13 PUBLIC HEARINGS 6:01 p.m. - Grace & Grit - This Site Plan Application is for the proposed conversion of an existing 1,021 sq. ft. retail store to a six (6) seat restaurant and three (3) parking spaces on 0.13 acres in the Hamlet Business Zoning District. The property is located at 55750 Route 25, ±64' n/e/o Hobart Road & NYS Rt. 25, Southold. SCTM#1000-62-3-8 6:02 p.m. - Harold R. Reeve & Sons, Inc. - This proposal is for a Standard Subdivision of a 5.1 acre split -zoned parcel into 4 lots where Lot 1 equals 1 acre inclusive of 0.06 acres of unbuildable land, Lot 2 equals 1 acre inclusive of 0.05 acres of unbuildable land, Lot 3 equals 1 acre inclusive of 0.04 acres of unbuildable land located in the R-40 Zoning District and Lot 4 equals 1.8 acres located in both the R-40 and B Zoning Districts. A 0.3 acre proposed private road, Creek View Lane, is located on the northeast side of the subdivision off of Wickham Avenue. This proposal includes a Change of Zone Application where the zoning on Lot 4 is proposed to change from the R-40 and B Zoning Districts to the LB Zoning District. The property is located at 1605 Wickham Avenue, on the n/s/o County Road 48, approximately 190' w/o Wickham Avenue, in Mattituck. SCTM#1000-140-1-6 6:03 p.m. -Braun Seafood Retail Store, - This Site Plan is for the proposed conversion of an existing 1,128 sq. ft. residential dwelling to retail use on 0.4 acres in the General Business (B) Zoning District. The property is located at 31000 Route 25, ±430' n/e/o Stillwater Avenue & Main Road, Cutchogue. SCTM#1 000-103-1 -1 6:04 p.m. - Krupski Farm Storage Building - This Agricultural Site Plan is for the construction of a 62'x 30' (1,860 sq. ft.) agricultural storage building to replace an existing greenhouse on 19.5 acres in the A -C Zoning District. The property is located at 38030 Route 25, ±745' n/e/o Skunk Lane & NYS Rt. 25, Peconic. SCTM#1000-85-3-8 APPROVAL OF PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Board to approve the minutes of: June 1, 2015. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR July 7, 2015 Karen A. Hoeg, Esq. P.O. Box 9398 Riverhead, NY 11901 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P:O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www. southoldtownny. gov Re: Conditional Sketch Plan Approval - Mazzoni, 500 Soundview Drive, LLC Located at 500 Soundview Drive, approximately 782' to the north of NYS Route 25 and 256' to the east of Soundview Drive, Orient SCTM#1000-13-2-8.2 Zoning District: R-80 Dear Ms. Hoeg: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the.following resolution at a meeting held on Monday, July 6, 2015: WHEREAS, this proposal is for a Standard Subdivision of a 22.94 acre parcel. into 5 lots where Lot 1 = 2.27 acres, Lot 2 = 1.67 acres, Lot 3 = 2.13 acres, Lot 4 = 0.59 acres, Lot 5 = 16.28 acres inclusive of a 1.21 acres right-of-way, 8.58 acres of Open Space and 6 acres of a Conservation Easement held by the Peconic Land Trust (PLT) located in the R-80 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, on March 12, 2014, the agent submitted a Sketch Plan Application with other required materials for submission pursuant to Article V Sketch Plat Review; and WHEREAS, on April 25, 2014, the Planning Board reviewed the application at their Work Session and found the application incomplete with items to be submitted; and WHEREAS, on July 1, 2014, the agent submitted items requested at the April 25th Work Session; and WHEREAS, on July 21, 2014, at their Work Session the Planning Board reviewed the submitted items, found the application complete, however, the Planning Board required clarification in regards to specific items required for application completeness; and WHEREAS, on August 21, 2014, at their Work Session the Planning Board reviewed the completed application and requested that changes be made to the lot design;. and Mazzoni . Pae 12 July 7, 2015 WHEREAS, on October 29, 2014, the agent submitted a letter from the New York State Office of Parks Recreation and Historic Preservation that found that no archaeological investigation is required; and WHEREAS, on November 5, 2014, the agent submitted revised maps for Planning Board review; and WHEREAS, on November 17, 2014, at their Work Session the Planning Board reviewed the revised map design and agreed, as per the recommendation of the applicant's surveyor, that the agent may set up a meeting with Planning Staff to discuss adequate setbacks and future potential uses of the development area on proposed Lot 5; and WHEREAS, on May 5, 2015, the agents submitted revised plans for Planning Board review; and WHEREAS, on June 1, 2015, at their Work Session the Planning Board reviewed the revised maps and requested nonconforming lot setbacks pursuant to §280-124 of the Southold Town Code be used for the proposed lots; and WHEREAS, on June 10, 2015, the agent submitted revised maps that show the requested nonconforming setbacks; and WHEREAS, on June 15, 2015, at their Work Session the Planning Board reviewed the revised maps and agreed that the application meets all the requirements for Sketch Approval pursuant to Article V Sketch Plat Review; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby grants Conditional Sketch Plan Approval upon the map entitled "Henry Mazzoni Subdivision Standard Cluster", dated October 27, 2013 and last revised June 9, 2015, prepared by Howard Young, Licensed Land Surveyor, with the following conditions: 1. The Sketch Plan Approval is a conceptual lot design that has received a minimum amount of review and has not yet been through the public hearing process. As such, the lot design and any other aspect of the Sketch Plan may be required to be changed during the Preliminary Plat Stage after the benefit of a public hearing and a more in-depth review by involved agencies and the Planning Board. 2. Submission of all Preliminary Plat requirements pursuant to §240-16 Submission and §240-17 Technical Requirement of the Southold Town Code. 3. The Preliminary Plat must show common access to the Long Island. Sound as a 4 ft. wide Pedestrian Access Easement.. 4. The Preliminary Plat must note the correct zoning district - Residential -80 (R-80) instead of Hamlet Density Residential (HD). Mazzoni Pae 13 July 7, 2015 5. Prove that the property has potable water. 6. Lot setbacks will be determined during the Preliminary Plat review. Note that specifics regarding map changes, content of the Covenants and Restrictions, other legal documents and submission requirements needed for subdivision approval will be provided to the applicant by the Planning Board upon completion of the environmental review and receipt of comments from other involved agencies. The applicant is advised that design changes may be required prior to Final Plat Approval. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. Very truly yours,, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR July 7, 2015 Mr. Theodore C. Martz, Jr. 145 Ryerson Avenue Manorville, NY 11949 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov Re: Conditional Sketch Plan Approval - Proposed Standard Subdivision for Martz Located at 555 and 315 Broadwaters Road, on Broadwaters Road approximately 80 feet west of Wunneweta Road, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-104-12-6.1 Zoning Districts: R-40 Dear Mr. Martz: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolutions at a meeting held on Monday, July 6, 2015: WHEREAS, this proposal is for a Standard Subdivision of a 1.62 acre parcel into two lots where proposed Lot 1 equals 0.71 acres and proposed Lot 2 equals 0.92 acres, located in the R-40 Zoning District. The Zoning Board of Appeals granted an Area Variance to allow for Lot 1 to be less than 40,000 sq. ft.; and WHEREAS, on April 22, 2015, the applicant submitted a Sketch Plan Application with other required materials for submission pursuant to Article V Sketch Plat Review; and WHEREAS, on May 18, 2015, the Planning Board reviewed the application at their Work Session and found the application complete with items to be submitted; and WHEREAS, on May 19, 2015, the applicant submitted all revisions to the Sketch Plan Application Form and the Full Environmental Assessment Form, as requested by the Planning Board at their May 18th Work Session; and WHEREAS, on June 15, 2015, -the Planning Board, at their Work Session, reviewed the application and agreed to waive the requirements for the Existing Resource Site Analysis Plan (ERSAP) and Primary & Secondary Conservation Area Plan as Planning Staff conducted a site inspection and determined that the submitted Sketch Plan includes all items that would be required in the ERSAP; and. Martz Standard Subdivision Pae 2 July 7, 2015 WHEREAS, on June 15, 2015, the Planning Board, at their Work Session, agreed that the application meets all the requirements for Sketch Plan Approval pursuant to Article V Sketch Plat Review; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby waives the requirements for the Existing Resource Site Analysis Plan and the Primary & Secondary Conservation Area Plan; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby grants Conditional Sketch Plan Approval upon the map entitled "Sketch Plan", dated April 30, 2007, prepared by Kenneth M. Woychuk, Land Surveyor, with the following conditions: a. Submission of all Preliminary Plat requirements pursuant to §240-16 Submission and §240-17 Technical Requirement of the Southold Town Code. b. Submission of the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation referral response. c. Submission of a Request Natural Heritage Data Form to the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). All comments from the DEC must be submitted to the Planning Board for review and approval. d. Show on the Preliminary Plat a 20 foot wide natural and undisturbed buffer 170 feet in length along the east and west property lines, beginning at the southern property line and a 30 foot natural undisturbed buffer along the entire southern property line which will remain in perpetuity. e. The Sketch Plan Approval is a conceptual lot design that has received a minimum amount of review and has not yet been through the public hearing process. As such, the lot design and any other aspect of the Sketch Plan may be required to be changed during the Preliminary Plat Stage after the benefit of a public hearing and a more in-depth review by involved agencies and the Planning Board. Note that specifics regarding map changes, content of the Covenants and Restrictions, other legal documents and submission requirements needed for subdivision approval will be provided to the applicant by the Planning Board upon completion of the environmental review and receipt of comments from other involved agencies. The applicant is advised that design changes may be required prior to Final Plat Approval. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR July 7, 2015 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 *pE SOUT�,o� PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtow-nny.gov Re: Sketch Plan Approval Extension - Proposed Standard Subdivision for Noone Located on the west side of Sigsbee Road, 164' south of Main Road, Mattituck SCTM#1000-143-1-4.1 Zoning Districts: B & R-40 Dear Ms. Moore: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolution at a meeting held on Monday, July 6, 2015: WHEREAS, this proposal is for a 2 -lot Standard Subdivision of a 21,000 sq. ft. parcel where Lot 1 = 10,501 sq. ft. and Lot 2 = 10,500 sq. ft. in the R-40 & B Zoning Districts; and WHEREAS, on April 11, 2011, the Southold Town Planning Board granted Sketch Plan Approval upon the map entitled "Minor Subdivision Map Prepared for Margaret A. & Thomas E. Noone, Mattituck", dated March 27, 2009 and last revised December 1, 2010, prepared by Nathan Taft Corwin, III, Land Surveyor; and WHEREAS, on October 11, 2011, Sketch Plan Approval expired; and WHEREAS, on May 21, 2012, the agent requested an Extension of Sketch Plan Approval; and WHEREAS, on June 4, 2012, the Southold Town Planning Board granted an Extension of Sketch Plan Approval through December 4, 2012 upon the map entitled "Minor Subdivision Map Prepared for Margaret A. & Thomas E. Noone, Mattituck", dated March 27, 2009 and last revised December 1, 2010, prepared by Nathan Taft Corwin, III, Land Surveyor; and WHEREAS, on December 4, 2012, Sketch Plan Approval expired; and Noone, Margaret Page Two July 7, 2015 WHEREAS, on December 5, 2012, the agent requested an extension due to delays encountered with their engineer; and WHEREAS, on December 17, 2012, the Southold Town Planning Board granted an Extension of Sketch Plan Approval through June 4, 2013 upon the map entitled "Minor Subdivision Map Prepared for Margaret A. & Thomas E. Noone, Mattituck", dated March 27, 2009 and last revised December 1, 2010, prepared by Nathan Taft Corwin, III, Land Surveyor; and WHEREAS, on June 4, 2013, the Extension of Sketch Plan Approval expired; and WHEREAS, on June 11, 2015, the agent submitted a request for an extension as detailed in a letter submitted by the agent on June 11, 2015; and WHEREAS, on July 6, 2015, at their Work Session, the Planning Board reviewed the request for an extension; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby grants an Extension of Sketch Plan Approval from June 4, 2013 to January 1, 2016 upon the map entitled "Minor Subdivision Map Prepared for Margaret A. & Thomas E. Noone, Mattituck", dated March 27, 2009 and last revised December 1, 2010, prepared by Nathan Taft Corwin, III, Land Surveyor. Extension of Sketch Plan Approval is valid for six months from the date of approval. Within six months of the date of this approval, a complete Preliminary Plat Application must be submitted to this office unless an extension of time is requested and granted by the Planning Board. Note that specifics regarding map changes, content of the Covenants and Restrictions, other legal documents and submission requirements needed for subdivision approval will be provided to the applicant by the Planning Board upon completion of the environmental review and receipt of comments from other involved agencies. The applicant is advised that design changes may be required prior to Preliminary and/or Final Plat Approval. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR July 7, 2015 Abigail Wickham, Esq. P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck, NY 11952 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 www.southoldtowirmy.gov Re: Sketch Plan Approval Extension - Standard Subdivision of William J. Baxter, Jr. Located at 240 Griffing St., on the northeast side of Grilling St., approximately 402 feet west of the Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-102-5-9.2 Zoning District: HB Dear Ms: Wickham: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolution at a meeting held on Monday, July 6, 2015: WHEREAS, this proposed Standard Subdivision is to subdivide a 2.38 acre parcel into 4 lots where Lot 1 equals 0.62 acres, Lot 2 equals 0.63 acres, Lot 3 equals 0.62 acres and Lot 4 equals 0.52 acres. The parcel is located in the Hamlet Business Zoning District; and WHEREAS, on July 1, 2013, the Southold Town Planning Board granted an Extension of Sketch Plan Approval through December 4, 2013 upon the map prepared by Nathan Taft Corwin, III, Land Surveyor, entitled "Yield Map prepared for William J. Baxter, Jr. situated at Cutchogue", dated September 15, 1998 and last revised May 17, 2011; and WHEREAS, on December 7, 2014, the Extension of Sketch Plan Approval expired; and WHEREAS, on December 15, 2014, the Southold Town Planning Board granted an Extension of Sketch Plan Approval through June 7, 2015 upon the map prepared by Nathan Taft Corwin, III, Land Surveyor, entitled "Yield Map prepared for William J. Baxter, Jr. situated at Cutchogue", dated September 15, 1998 and last revised May 17, 2011; and WHEREAS, on June 3, 2015, the agent requested a six (6) month extension so that Health Department Approval can be satisfied; and WHEREAS, on June 7, 2015, the Extension of Sketch Plan Approval expired; therefore, be it Baxter 21 Page __ ...... .. .............. ._.............._......_ ......._...... .. _._ _ . _ .._. _ ... 2 91-5 RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby grants an Extension of Sketch Plan Approval for six (6) months from June 7, 2015 to December 26, 2015 upon the map prepared by Nathan Taft Corwin, III, Land Surveyor, entitled "Yield Map prepared for William J. Baxter, Jr. situated at Cutchogue", dated September 15; 1998 and last revised May 17, 2011. Extension of Sketch Plan Approval is valid for six months. Within six months of the date of this approval, a complete Preliminary Plat Application must be submitted to this office unless an extension of time is requested and granted by the Planning Board. Note that specifics regarding map changes, content of the Covenants and Restrictions, other legal documents and submission requirements needed for subdivision approval will be provided to the applicant by the Planning Board upon completion of the environmental review and receipt of comments from other involved agencies. The applicant is advised that design changes may be required prior to Final Plat Approval. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski " Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR July 7, 2015 Charles Cuddy, Esq. P.O. Box 1547 Riverhead, NY 11901 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov Re: Extension of Conditional Final Approval: Proposed Standard Subdivision Aries Estates/Shawn Tully Located at the westerly terminus of a private right-of-way which extends north from Kayleigh's Court in East Marion SCTM#1000-22=3-2 Zoning District: R-80 Dear Mr. Cuddy: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolutions at a meeting held on Monday, July 6, 2015: WHEREAS, this proposal is for a Standard Subdivision of an 11.4 -acre parcel into two lots where Lot 1 equals 5.7 acres, including 3.3 acres of open space and Lot 2 equals 5.7 acres, including 3.2 acres of open space, in the R-80 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, on March 10, 2014, the Southold Town Planning Board granted Conditional Final Approval upon.the map entitled "Final Plat for the Subdivision Map Shawn Tully", prepared by Howard Young, L.S., dated June 25, 2010 and last revised October 1, 2013, subject to conditions to be completed prior to Final Plat Approval; and WHEREAS, on September 10, 2014, Conditional Final Plat Approval expired; and WHEREAS,.the applicant requested a 90 day extension to fulfill the conditions of Conditional Final Approval; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board granted a 90 day Extension of Conditional Final Approval through December 10, 2014; and WHEREAS, in a letter dated December 1, 2014, the agent requested an extension to provide the applicant more time to obtain the Performance Bond; and Aries Estates — Page 12 — July 7, 2015 WHEREAS, on December 10, 2014, the Extension of Conditional Final Approval expired; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board found that the reason for the extension was acceptable; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board granted a 90 day Extension of Conditional Final Plat Approval though March 10, 2015; and WHEREAS, on March 10, 2015, Conditional Final Plat Approval expired and was the last Extension of Conditional Final Approval allowed by Town Code §240-25 C; and WHEREAS, pursuant to §240-56 Waivers of Certain Provisions, the Planning Board may waive or modify provisions of the subdivision regulations, if in its judgment they are not requisite in the interest of the public health, safety and general welfare; and WHEREAS, on April 6, 2015, the Planning Board, at their Work Session, reviewed a request from the applicant to extend their Conditional Final Plat Approval beyond the limit in the Town Code to give the applicant more time to review and further understand the limitations of the building envelope/clearing area on the proposed lots. The limit of extensions in Town Code §240-25 C is 360 days, which limit was exceeded on March 10, 2015. After review, the Planning Board found that the limit of 360 days of extensions beyond the original Conditional Final Plat Approval is not requisite in the interest of the public health, safety and general welfare in this case because a short extension beyond that would have no effect on the public. No Code changes, other regulation changes or changes in the conditions or features of the land are. expected to occur within the additional 90 days requested; and WHEREAS, on April 6, 2015, Southold Town Planning Board granted a 90 day Extension of Conditional Final Approval through June 8, 2015 upon the map entitled "Final Plat for the Subdivision Map Shawn Tully", prepared by Howard Young, L.S., dated June 25, 2010 and last revised October 1, 2013, subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, on June 1, 2015, the agent submitted a request for a 60 day extension due to revising the final map; and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2015, the extension of Conditional Final Approval expired; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board reviewed the request from the agent for a 60 day extension and instead agreed to grant an extension of 90 days to allow enough time to complete the conditions of Conditional Final Approval; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board. hereby modifies Town Code §240-25 C as stated above, to allow an additional 90 day Extension of Conditional Final Plat Approval; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby grants a 90 day Extension of Conditional Final Approval from June 8, 2015 to September 6, 2015 upon the map entitled "Final Plat for the Subdivision Map Shawn Tully", prepared by Howard Young, L.S., dated June 25, 2010 and last revised October 1, 2013,, subject to conditions. Aries Estates — Page 13 — July 7, 2015 If the conditions of Conditional Final approval are not met within the 90 day extension of time, the application for Final Plat must be re -submitted along with the corresponding fee. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR July 7, 2015 SOU��o� COUNT`1,� PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Ms. Elaine Villano, Business Manager Sacred Heart Parish P.O. Box 926 Cutchogue, New York 11935 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtowuny.gov Re: Extension of Final Plat Approval for the Approved Lot Line Modification for Sacred Heart Church & Valerioti Located at 3400 & 4200 Deport Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#s1000-96-5-10 & 12.1 Zoning District: A -C Dear Ms. Villano: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolution at a meeting held on Monday, July, 6 2015: WHEREAS, this Lot Line Change will transfer 0.48 acres from SCTM#1000-96-5-10 to SCTM#1 000-96-5-12. 1. Lot 12.1 will increase from 35.03 acres to 35.51 acres and Lot 10 will decrease from 1.74 acres to 1.26 acres located in the A -C Zoning District; and WHEREAS, on December 16, 2013, the Southold Town Planning Board granted Final Approval on the map entitled "Lot Line Modification Situate: Cutchogue", prepared by John C. Ehlers, Land Surveyor, dated November 25, 2013; and WHEREAS, a copy of the recorded deeds must be submitted to the Southold Town Planning Department within 62 days of the date of Final Approval, or such approval shall expire and be null and void; and WHEREAS, on February 19, 2014, Final Approval expired; and WHEREAS, on May 1, 2014, the agent submitted a request for a 180 day Extension of Final Plat Approval due to delays related to the final closing of the property; and Sacred Heart & Valerioti Page Two July 7, 2015 WHEREAS, on May 5, 2014, the Southold Town Planning Board granted an Extension of Final Approval through August 19, 2014 on the maps entitled Lot Line Modification Situate: Cutchogue", prepared by John C. Ehlers, Land Surveyor, dated November 25, 2013; and WHEREAS, on August 19, 2014, the Extension of Final Approval expired; and WHEREAS, on February 9, 2015, the deed was recorded in the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk; and WHEREAS, on June 16, 2015, an Extension of Final Approval was requested; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grants an Extension of Final Approval from August 19, 2014 to August 1, 2015 on the maps entitled "Lot Line Modification Situate: Cutchogue", prepared by John C. Ehlers, Land Surveyor, dated November 25, 2013. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman cc: William Goggins, Esq. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR July 7, 2015 Mr. Steven A. Martocello 24 Miller- Woods Drive Miller Place, NY 11764 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY _ Telephone: 631765-1938 www. southoldtownny. gov Re: Lead Agency/SEQR Classification/SEQR Determination: Positive Declaration - Proposed Standard Subdivision The Orchards Located at 2595 Orchard Street, on the northeast side of Orchard Street, approximately 17' northwest of Platt Road, Orient SCTM#1000-27-1-3 Zoning District: R-80 Dear.Mr. Martocello: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolutions at a meeting held on Monday, July 6, 2015: WHEREAS, this proposal is for a Clustered Standard Subdivision to subdivide a 13.3 acre parcel into five lots where Lot 1 = 9.33 acres including a 1.35 acre building envelope and 7.98 acres of preserved Open Space, Lot 2 = 0.99 acres, Lot 3 = 1.14 acres, Lot 4 = 0.92 and Lot 5 = 0.92 acres in the R-80 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) 6 NYCRR, Part 617, has determined that the proposed action is an Unlisted Action; and WHEREAS, pursuant 6 NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.7 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), the Planning Board coordinated with all involved and interested agencies on February 13, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board, as Lead Agency, performed a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617, Section 61,7.7 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA); be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Planning Board hereby declares Lead Agency status for the SEQRA review of this Unlisted Action; and be it further Tlie 0rchards 2 Pac e July 7. 20 _ ........ ..... ........................_.... ....._ _._..__..........._.._L............... �................ ..........._.... . .......... _ ........ . RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board has determined that this proposed action is an Unlisted Action under SEQRA as described above; and be it further RESOLVED that Type I procedures will be used for the review of this Unlisted Action due to the Lead Agency determination that there are potential adverse impacts regarding a sensitive resource within its jurisdiction and the Type I procedures would be more helpful; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to SEQRA, hereby makes a determination of significance for the proposed action and issues a Positive Declaration. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. Very truly yours, rZ Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman cc: John Ehlers, Surveyor PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR Project Number: SCTM# 1000-21-7-3 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft EIS Determination of Significance MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtownny. gov Date: July 6, 2015 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The Town of Southold Planning Board as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant impact on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. Type I procedures were used for the review of this Unlisted action due to the Lead Agency determination that there are potential adverse impacts regarding a sensitive resource within its jurisdiction and the Type I procedures would be more helpful. Name of Action: The Orchards Standard Subdivision SEQR Status: Type 1 Unlisted X Scoping: No X Yes — If yes, indicate how scoping will be conducted: SEAR Positive Declaration Pae 12 July 6, 2015 Description of Action: This proposal is for a Clustered Standard Subdivision to subdivide a 13.3 acre parcel into five lots where Lot 1 = 9.33 acres including a 1.35 acre building envelope and 7.98 acres of preserved Open Space, Lot 2 = 0.99 acres, Lot 3 = 1.14 acres, Lot 4 = 0.92 and Lot 5 = 0.92 acres in the R- 80 Zoning District. Location: The property is located on the northeast side of Orchard Street, approximately 17' northwest of Platt Road, in Orient, New York. Reasons Supporting This Determination: This proposed action may cause a potential moderate to large adverse impact on surface waters, groundwater, agricultural resources, aesthetic resources (scenic view sheds important to the community) and archeological resources. A comprehensive review must be conducted to determine the potential impacts and mitigation of impacts (if necessary) identified for the proposed action. The Town of Southold Planning Board is requiring a review of the action to determine the magnitude, importance and probability of occurrence of potential impacts. Relevant areas of concern include: 1. Impacts on Surface Water a. The proposed action may affect the water quality of any water bodies within or downstream of the site of the proposed action. Recent studies have linked on-site sanitary systems with contributing itrogen to surface waters and cumulative impacts could be moderate to large. In the Peconic Estuary, after atmospheric deposition, groundwater is estimated as the second largest external source of Nitrogen, totaling 21 percent of the total Nitrogen load, or 7,450 lbs/day. Groundwater and other nonpoint sources are the primary contributors to water quality degradation of the Peconic Estuary contributing to algal blooms and hypoxia SCDHS). The Peconic Estuary has experienced detrimental changes from increased nutrient loads to ground and ultimately surface waters. Low Dissolved Oxygen (DO) conditions (hypoxia) develop due to excessive levels of Nitrogen (N) and Phosphorous (P). Hypoxia is a result from planktonic algae blooms that feed on the nutrients. The algae die and settle to the bottom of the water body then decay, using up Dissolved Oxygen in the process. The Oxygen levels frequently fall below the levels necessary to sustain life and often results in fish and shellfish die offs. The impacts of the new sanitary systems proposed on down gradient surface water must be assessed. 2. Impact on Groundwater a. The potential moderate to large impacts to existing groundwater quality and/or quantity. SEAR Positive Declaration Pae 13 July 6, 2015 The action is proposed in an area without access to public water and community (public) sewer. Potential adverse impacts to groundwater quality and quantity could be severe and boundless and must be assessed. The probability of the impact occurring is moderate and would affect the area population. b. The proposed action will require new water supply wells, or create additional demand on supplies from existing water supply wells. The parcel is not served by public water. New private wells served by groundwater will be required to provide potable water to future residences. The action must be assessed to water availabilily of a potable water source and the impacts of future development on groundwater supply_ c. Water supply demand from the proposed action may exceed safe and sustainable withdrawal capacity rate of the local supply or aquifer. Water supply demand of potable groundwater for the potential lots must be assessed. d. The proposed action may allow or result in residential uses in areas without water and sewer services. The parcels are located within an area with no availability to public water or sewers. Suffolk County Department of Health Services approvals will be required. Assessment of potential impacts to groundwater from new sanitary system (pharmaceuticals and personal care products), pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers must be included. Impacts to adjacent properties must also be discussed. e. The proposed action will require wastewater discharged to groundwater. The amount of wastewateralg lons per day (gpd) dischargedgroundwater and compliance with Suffolk County Department of Health Services regulations must be discussed. f. The proposed action may result in the construction of water supply wells in locations where groundwater is, or is suspected to be, contaminated. Areas of Orient have exhibited groundwater contamination. A narrative of existing conditions and threats can be found in the Suffolk County Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan (2015). A discussion of current groundwater qualitL contamination and impacts on the proposed action and adjacent properties must be included_ g. The proposed action may involve the commercial application of pesticides within 100 feet of potable drinking water or irrigation sources. The proposed lots are located adjacent to agricultural lands which are included and part of the subdivision. An assessment of the impacts of pesticides within 100 feet of potable drinking water (wells) or irrigation sources for lawn and crops must be included. SEQR Positive Declaration Pae 14 July 6, 2015 3. Impact on Agricultural Resources a. The proposed action may impact soil classified within Soil Group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System. The NY Department of Agriculture and Markets has created a Land Classification System based on soils that are used in the Agricultural Assessment Program pursuant to Article 25 -AA of the Agriculture and Markets Law. Soil Groups can be identified at the NYS Agriculture and Markets Soil Group Numbers page. hqp:Hagiieulture.ny.gov/AP/agservices/soils/2014/suffl4.pdf Impacts to highly productive soils include conversion of areas to non-farm (residential) use. Further, the conversion of farmland to residential use is INCONSISTENT with the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Policies. 12.1. Protect agricultural lands from conversion to other land uses. Town records indicate that the property is listed in an Agricultural District and that the parcel contains prime agricultural soils. The proposed action does not fully meet this policy. A total of 5.8+ acres of prime agricultural soil is posed to be converted to other (residential) land uses. 12.3. Minimize adverse impacts on agriculture from unavoidable conversion of agricultural land. The LWRP states that "Where farmland is converted to residential or other non- agricultural land use, the adverse impacts of that change on the remaining agricultural land should be minimized. To the maximum extent possible, clustering and other techniques should be utilized to retain sufficient land suitable for agricultural opportunities within the new development area. Arrangements for keeping viable fields in production through lease arrangements or easements should be encouraged. Site design should minimize potential conflicts between new residential or commercial uses and the agricultural use." As indicated above, the purpose of the 60% of open space in this instance is to support future agricultural uses and preserve scenic qualities of the parcel to meet Town goals. Consequently, the clusteringof f the proposed lots to minimize adverse impacts on agriculture should be discussed. b. The proposed action may sever, cross or otherwise limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.). The residential development of the land will require utilities and roadways that will transverse active agricultural lands. The clustering of lots lessens the impediments that residential development could produce for agricultural lands. The assessment of potential impacts agricultural lands access must be discussed and any mitigation identified and/or proposed. SEAR Positive Declaration Pae 15 July 6, 2015 The proposed action may result in the excavation or compaction of the soil profile of active agricultural land. The development of five (5) single family residential lots and associated roadways will result in compaction of soil profile of fallow agricultural lands. The assessment must include a discussion on the potential loss of agricultural lands/soils and the mitigation proposed. d. The proposed action may result, directly or indirectly, in increased development potential or pressure on farmland. The potential impact of moderate to large impacts to prime agricultural soils must be assessed. The proposed project is not consistent with the adopted municipal Farmland Protection Plan. The'consistency of the action with the Southold Town Farm and Farmland Protection Strategy (y 2000) and Community Preservation Project Plan (2008) must be assessed 4. Impacts on Archeological Resources a. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous to, an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Archaeological Site Inventory. The action is located within an archeologically sensitive area. The New York Department of Parks Recreation and Historic Preservation is requiring a Phase I Cultural Assessment for all areas to be developed. The assessment must include the results of the study. 5. Impacts on Aesthetic Resources a. The action may impact scenic view sheds identified (file record) as important to the community. Proposed action will be visible from public roadways Orchard Street and Platt Road. The scenic view from the roadway has been identified as important by the community in correspondence and public testimony (subject file). The potential impact from the siting and scale of the homes could be moderate to large based on lot size. The action has been recommended as INCONSISTENT with the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program policies: Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Snu.thnld A. Minimize introduction ofstructural design components (including utility lines, lighting, sL�ge and fencing) which would be discordant with existing natural scenic components and character. SEQR Positive Declaration Pae 16 July 6, 2015 The development of the proposed lots would interrupt the scenic qualities of the parcel; Lots 4 and 5 at their current location may interrupt the scenic character of the parcel significantly. Further the building envelope setbacks on Lots 2-4 appear to be incorrect. K. Protect visual quality associated with agricultural land open space and natural resources. 2. Group or orient structures during site desiP,,nto preserve open space and provide visual organization. The application does not meet or further the above LWRP policy. Due to the scenic quality and agriculture potential of the property, the impacts of the proposed design must be assessed. The clustering of structures will further Chapter 240-43 Article XI. Cluster Development. The prime farmland (agricultural soils) and scenic views into the property from adjacent properties and existing public roads (Orchard Street) are secondary conservation areas The impacts to the scenic view shed from Orchard Street must be discussed. 6. Consistency with Community Character a. The proposed action may create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire). The action is expected to create a demand for police and fire services. The demand for such services must be discussed. 7. The assessment of a no action alternative. For Further Information: Contact Person: Mark Terry, Principal Planner Alyxandra Sabatino, Planner Address: P.O. Box 1179, 5309 State Road 25, Southold, New York 11971 Telephone Number: 631-765-1938 A copy of this notice must be sent to: Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Orient Fire District Southold Police Department New York State Department of State NYSDEC - Stony Brook Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Southold Highway Department Southold Architectural Review Committee Environmental Notice Bulletin File Any person requesting a copy Agency Use Only [If applicable] Full Environmental Assessment Form Project : The Orchards Standard Subdivision Part 2 - Identification of Potential Project Impacts Date: 7/7/15 Part 2 is to be completed by the lead agency. Part 2 is designed to help the lead agency inventory all potential resources that could be affected by a proposed project or action. We recognize that the lead agency's reviewer(s) will not necessarily be environmental professionals. So, the questions are designed to walk a reviewer through the assessment process by providing a series of questions that can be answered using the information found in Part 1. To further assist the lead agency in completing Part 2, the form identifies the most "relevant questions in Part 1 that will provide the information needed to answer the Part 2 question. When Part 2 is completed, the lead agency will have identified the relevant environmental areas that may be impacted by the proposed activity. If the lead agency is a state agency and the action is in any Coastal Area, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Tips for completing Part 2: • Review all of the information provided in Part 1. • Review any application, maps, supporting materials and the Full EAF Workbook. • Answer each of the 18 questions in Part 2. • If you answer "Yes" to a numbered question, please complete all the questions that follow in that section. • If you answer "No" to a numbered question, move on to the next numbered question. • Check appropriate column to indicate the anticipated size of the impact. • Proposed projects that would exceed a numeric threshold contained in a question should result in the reviewing agency checking the box "Moderate to large impact may occur." • The reviewer is not expected to be an expert in environmental analysis. • If you are not sure or undecided about the size of an impact, it may help to review the sub -questions for the general question and consult the workbook. • . When answering a question consider all components of the proposed activity, that is, the "whole action". • Consider the possibility for long-term and cumulative impacts as well as direct impacts. • Answer the question in a reasonable manner considering the scale and context of the project. 1. Impact on Land Proposed action may involve construction on, or physical alteration of, [:]NO ®YES the land surface of the proposed site. (See Part 1. D.1) I "Yes ", answer questions a - j, I "No ", move on to Section 2. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may involve construction on land where depth to water table is E2d ® ❑ less than 3 feet. b. The proposed action may involve construction on slopes of 15% or greater. Elf ® ❑ c. The proposed action may involve construction on land where bedrock is exposed, or E2a ® ❑ generally within 5 feet of existing ground surface. d. The proposed action may involve the excavation and removal of more than 1,000 tons 132a ® ❑ of natural material. e. The proposed action may involve construction that continues for more than one year Dle ® ❑ or in multiple phases. f. The proposed action may result in increased erosion, whether from physical disturbance or vegetation removal (including from treatment) by herbicides). D2e, D2q ® ❑ g. The proposed action is, or may be, located within a Coastal Erosion hazard area. B 1 i ® ❑ h. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Page 1 of 10 2. Impact on Geological Features The proposed action may result in the modification or destruction of, or inhibit access to, any unique or unusual land forms on the site (e.g., cliffs, dunes, ®NO OYES minerals, fossils, caves). (See Part 1. E.2.g) I "Yes ", answer questions a - c. I "No ", move on to Section 3. Relevant Relevant No, or Moderate Part I Part I small to large Question(s) Question(s) impact impact may may occur may occur occur a. Identify the specific land form(s).attached: E2g ° ❑ 132b b. The proposed action may affect or is adjacent to a geological feature listed as a E3c ❑ ❑ registered National Natural Landmark. c. The proposed action may involve dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material D2a Specific feature: ❑ from a wetland or water body. c. Other impacts: 3. Impacts on Surface Water The proposed action may affect one or more wetlands or other surface water ❑ NO OYES bodies (e.g., streams, rivers, ponds or lakes). (See Part 1. D.2, E.21) I "Yes ", answer questions a - L I "No ", move on to Section 4. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may create a new water body. 132b, D1h ® ❑ b. The proposed action may result in an increase or decrease of over 10% or more than a 132b ® ❑ 10 acre increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water. c. The proposed action may involve dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material D2a ® ❑ from a wetland or water body. d. The proposed action may involve construction within or adjoining a freshwater or E2h ® ❑ tidal wetland, or in the bed or banks of any other water body. e. The proposed action may create turbidity in a waterbody, either from upland erosion, D2a, D2h ® ❑ runoff or by disturbing bottom sediments. f. The proposed action may include construction of one or more intake(s) for withdrawal D2c ® ❑ of water from surface water. g. The proposed action may include construction of one or more outfall(s) for discharge D2d ® ❑ of wastewater to surface water(s). h. The proposed action may cause soil erosion, or otherwise create a source of D2e ® ❑ stormwater discharge that may lead to siltation or other degradation of receiving water bodies. i. The proposed action may affect the water quality of any water bodies within or E2h ❑ downstream of the site of the proposed action. j. The proposed action may involve the application of pesticides or herbicides in or D2q, E2h ® ❑ around any water body. k. The proposed action may require the construction of new, or expansion of existing, D1 a, D2d ® ❑ wastewater treatment facilities. Page 2 of 10 1. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 4. Impact on groundwater The proposed action may result in new or additional use of ground water, or [:]NO ©YES may have the potential to introduce contaminants to ground water or an aquifer. (See Part 1. D.2.a, D.2.c, D.2.d, D.2.p, D.2.q, D.2.t) If "Yes ", answer questions a - h. If "No ", move on to Section 5. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may require new water supply wells, or create additional demand 132c ❑ ❑ on supplies from existing water supply wells. E2i ® ❑ c. The proposed action may result in development within a 500 year floodplain. E2k ® ❑ b. Water supply demand from the proposed action may exceed safe and sustainable D2c ❑ withdrawal capacity rate of the local supply or aquifer. Cite Source: D2b, E2i, ® ❑ c. The proposed action may allow or result in residential uses in areas without water and Dla, D2c ❑ sewer services. E1 e ® ❑ d. The proposed action may include or require wastewater discharged to groundwater. 132d, E21 ❑ IZI e. The proposed action may result in the construction of water supply wells in locations D2c, Elf, ❑ where groundwater is, or is suspected to be, contaminated. Elg, Elh f. The proposed action may require the bulk storage of petroleum or chemical products 132p, E21 ® ❑ over ground water or an aquifer. g. The proposed action may involve the commercial application of pesticides within 100 feet of potable drinking water or irrigation sources. E2h, D2q, E21, D2c ❑ h. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 5. Impact on Flooding The proposed action may result in development on lands subject to flooding. ❑ NO V]YES (See Part 1. E.2) I "Yes ", answer questions a - g. I "No ", move on to Section 6. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may result in development in a designated floodway. E2i ® ❑ b. The proposed action may result in development within a 100 year floodplain. E2i ® ❑ c. The proposed action may result in development within a 500 year floodplain. E2k ® ❑ d. The proposed action may result in, or require, modification of existing drainage 132b, D2e ❑ patterns. e. The proposed action may change flood water flows that contribute to flooding. D2b, E2i, ® ❑ E2', E2k f. If there is a dam located on the site of the proposed action, is the dam in need of repair, E1 e ® ❑ or upgrade? Page 3 of 10 g. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 6. Impacts on Air The proposed action may include a state regulated air emission source. ©NO []YES (See Part 1. D.21., D,2,h, D.2.g) If "Yes ", answer questions a -f If "No ", move on to Section 7. No, or Relevant No, or Moderate small Part I small to large impact Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur may occur occur a. If the proposed action requires federal or state air emission permits, the action may ❑ threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York Stateor the Federal also emit one or more greenhouse gases at or above the following levels: government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. L More than 1000 .tons/year of carbon dioxide (CO2) D2g ❑ ❑ ii. More than 3.5 tons/year of nitrous oxide (N20) D2g ❑ ❑ iii. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon equivalent of perfluorocarbons (PFCs) D2g ❑ ❑ ❑ iv. More than .045 tons/year of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) D2g ❑ 11 0 v. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide equivalent of . D2g hydrochloroflourocarbons (EFCs) emissions c. The proposed action may cause reduction in population, or loss of individuals, of any E2p vi. 43 tons/year or more of methane D2h ❑ ❑ b. The proposed action may generate 10 tons/year or more of any one designated D2g ❑ ❑ hazardous air pollutant, or 25 tons/year or more of any combination of such hazardous air pollutants. d. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2p c. The proposed action may require a state air registration, or may produce an emissions D2f, D2g ❑ ❑ rate of total contaminants that may exceed 5 lbs. per hour, or may include a heat the Federal government. source capable of producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. d. The proposed action may reach 50% of any of the thresholds in "a" through "c", D2g ❑ ❑ above. e. The proposed action may result in the combustion or thermal treatment of more than 1 D2s ❑ ❑ ton of refuse per hour. f. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 7. Impact on Plants and Animals The proposed action may result in a loss of flora or fauna. (See Part 1. E.2. m. -q.) ❑NO g]YES I "Yes ", answer questions a J. I "No ", move on to Section 8. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may cause reduction in population or loss of individuals of any E2o ® ❑ threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York Stateor the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. b. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2o ❑ any rare, threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the federal government. c. The proposed action may cause reduction in population, or loss of individuals, of any E2p ® ❑ species of special concern or conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. d. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2p ® ❑ any species of special concern and conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government. Page 4 of 10 e. The proposed action may diminish the capacity of a registered National Natural Landmark to support the biological community it was established to protect. E3c ® ❑ f. The proposed action may result in the removal of, or ground disturbance in, any portion of a designated significant natural community. Source: E2n ® ❑ Part I g. The proposed action may substantially interfere with nesting/breeding, foraging, or over -wintering habitat for the predominant species that occupy or use the project site. E2m ® ❑ h. The proposed action requires the conversion of more than 10 acres of forest, grassland or any other regionally or locally important habitat. Habitat type & information source: Elb ❑ ❑ i. Proposed action (commercial, industrial or recreational projects, only) involves use of herbicides or pesticides. D2q ® ❑ j. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 8. Impact on Agricultural Resources The proposed action may impact agricultural resources. (See Part 1. E.3.a. and b.) [:]NO W]YES I "Yes ", answer questions a - h. I "No ", move on to Section 9. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may impact soil classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the Etc, E3b ❑ NYS Land Classification System. b. The proposed action may sever, cross or otherwise limit access to agricultural land Ela, Elb ❑ (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc). c. The proposed action may result in the excavation or compaction of the soil profile of E3b ❑ active agricultural land. d. The proposed action may irreversibly convert agricultural land to non-agricultural Elb, E3a ❑ uses, either more than 2.5 acres if located in an Agricultural District, or more than 10 acres if not within an Agricultural District. e. The proposed action may disrupt or prevent installation of an agricultural land El a, Elb ® ❑ management system. f. The proposed action may result, directly or indirectly, in increased development C2c, C3, ❑ IZI potential or pressure on farmland. D2c, D2d g. The proposed project is not consistent with the adopted municipal Farmland C2c ❑ Protection Plan. h. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Page 5 of 10 9. Impact on Aesthetic Resources The land use of the proposed action -are obviously different from, or are in []NO W]YES sharp contrast to, current land use patterns between the proposed project and a scenic or aesthetic resource. (Part 1. E. La, E. Lb, E.3.h.) I "Yes ' , answer questions a - g I "No ", go to Section 10. Relevant Relevant No, or Moderate Part I Part I small to large Question(s) Question(s) impact impact may may occur may occur occur a. Proposed action may be visible from any officially designated federal, state, or local E3h ❑ to, any buildings, archaeological site or district which is listed on or has been scenic or aesthetic resource. nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on the State or b. The proposed action may result in the obstruction, elimination or significant E3h, C2b ❑ National Register of Historic Places. screening of one or more officially designated scenic views. b. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous c. The proposed action may be visible from publicly accessible vantage points: E3h to, an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic i. Seasonally (e.g., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) ❑ Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory. ii. Year round ❑ c. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous d. The situation or activity in which viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed E3h ❑ to, an archaeological site not included on the NY SHPO inventory. action is: E29' Source: L Routine travel by residents, including travel to and from work ❑ ii. Recreational or tourism based activities Elc e. The proposed action may cause a diminishment of the public enjoyment and E3h ❑ appreciation of the designated aesthetic resource. f. There are similar projects visible within the following distance of the proposed Dla, Ela, ® ❑ project: Dlf, Dlg 0-1/2 mile '/2 -3 mile 3-5 mile 5+ mile g. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 10. Impact on Historic and Archeological Resources The proposed action may occur in or adjacent to a historic or archaeological [—]NO ❑✓ YES resource. (Part 1. E.3.e, f. and g.) If "Yes ", answer questions a - e. If "No ", go to Section 11. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous E3e to, any buildings, archaeological site or district which is listed on or has been nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on the State or National Register of Historic Places. b. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous E3f ❑ to, an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory. c. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous E3g ® ❑ to, an archaeological site not included on the NY SHPO inventory. Source: Page 6 of 10 d. Other impacts: The proposed action may result in a loss of recreational opportunities or a ❑ ❑ (See Part 1. C.2.c, E.l.c., E.2.q.) e. If any of the above (a -d) are answered "Yes", continue with the following questions Moderate Relevant No, or to help support conclusions in Part 3: to large Part I small i. The proposed action may result in the destruction or alteration of all or part E3e, E3g, ❑ ❑ of the site or property. E3f a. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the. resource or may occur ii. The proposed action may result in the alteration of the property's setting or E3e, E3f, ❑ m integrity. E3g, Ela, E2h, E3d ❑ Elb Elm, E2o, iii. The proposed action may result in the introduction of visual elements which E3e, E3f, ❑ 0 are out of character with the site or property, or may alter its setting. E3g, E3h, C2a, EIc, m ❑ C2, C3 C2c, E2 11. Impact on Open Space and Recreation [:]NO ❑✓ YES The proposed action may result in a loss of recreational opportunities or a reduction of an open space resource as designated in any adopted municipal open space plan. (See Part 1. C.2.c, E.l.c., E.2.q.) I "Yes ", answer questions a - e. I "No ", go to Section 12. Moderate Relevant No, or Moderate to large Part I small to large impact may Question(s) impact impact may occur a. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the. resource or may occur occur a. The proposed action may result in an impairment of natural functions, or "ecosystem D2e, Elb m ❑ services", provided by an undeveloped area, including but not limited to stormwater E2h, E3d ❑ storage, nutrient cycling, wildlife habitat. Elm, E2o, E2n, E2 ❑ b. The proposed action may result in the loss of a current or future recreational resource. C2a, EIc, m ❑ C2c, E2 c. The proposed action may eliminate open space or recreational resource in an area C2a, C2c m ❑ with few such resources. Elc, E2q d. The proposed action may result in loss of an area now used informally by the C2c, Elc m ❑ community as an open space resource. e. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 12. Impact on Critical Environmental Areas The proposed action may be located within or adjacent to a critical ✓❑ NO YES environmental area (CEA). (See Part 1. E.3.d) I "Yes ", answer questions a - c. 1 "No ", go to Section 13. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the. resource or EM ❑ Cl characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. b. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quality of the resource or E3d ❑ ❑ characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. c. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Page 7 of 10 13. Impact on Transportation The proposed action may result in a change to existing transportation systems. [:]NO ZYES (See Part 1. D.2.j) I "Yes ", answer questions a - g I "No ", go to Section 14. I "Yes ", answer questions a - e. I "No ", go to Section 15. Relevant No, or Moderate Moderate Part I small to large to large Question(s) impact impact may impact may may occur occur a. Projected traffic increase may exceed capacity of existing road network. D2j ® ❑ b. The proposed action may result in the construction of paved parking area for 500 or D2j ® ❑ more vehicles. or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two-family residences or to serve a. Dlq, D2k ® c. The proposed action will degrade existing transit access. D2j ® ❑ d. The proposed action will degrade existing pedestrian or bicycle accommodations. D2j ® ❑ e. The proposed action may alter the present pattern of movement of people or goods. D2j ® ❑ f. Other impacts: feet of building area when completed. ❑ ❑ 14. Impact on Energy The proposed action may cause an increase in the use of any form of energy. —]NO ©YES (See Part 1. D.21) I "Yes ", answer questions a - e. I "No ", go to Section 15. Relevant No, or - Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action will require a new, or an upgrade to an existing, substation. D2k ® ❑ b. The proposed action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission Dlf, ® ❑ or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two-family residences or to serve a. Dlq, D2k ® ❑ commercial or industrial use. c. The proposed action may utilize more than 2,500 Mwhrs per year of electricity. D2k ® ❑ d. The proposed action may involve heating and/or cooling of more than 100,000 square Dlg ® ❑ feet of building area when completed. e. Other Impacts: ❑ ❑ 15. Impact on Noise, Odor, and Light The proposed action may result in an increase in noise, odors, or outdoor lighting. [:]NO AYES (See Part 1. D.2.m., n., and o.) I "Yes ", answer questions a -f I "No ", go to Section 16. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may produce sound above noise levels established by local D2m ® ❑ regulation. b. The proposed action may result in blasting within 1,500 feet of any residence, D2m, Eld ® ❑ hospital, school, licensed daycare center, or nursing home. c. The proposed action may result in routine odors for more than one hour per day. D2o ® ❑ Page 8 of 10 d. The proposed action may result in light shining onto adjoining properties. D2n ® ❑ e. The proposed action may result in lighting creating sky -glow brighter than existing area conditions. D2n, El a ® ❑ f. Other impacts: small ❑ ❑ Question(s) 16. Impact on Human Health The proposed action may have an impact on human health from exposure ❑ NO [Z]YES . to new or existing sources of contaminants. (See Part 1.D.2.q., E.1. d. f. g. and h.) I "Yes ", answer questions a - m. I `No ", go to Section 17. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may cccur occur a. The proposed action is located within 1500 feet of a school, hospital, licensed day Eld ® ❑ care center, group home, nursing home or retirement community. b. The site of the proposed action is currently undergoing remediation. Elg, Elh ® ❑ c. There is a completed emergency spill remediation, or a completed environmental site Elg, Elh ® ❑ remediation on, or adjacent to, the site of the proposed action. d. The site of the action is subject to an institutional control limiting the use of the Elg, Elh ® ❑ property (e.g., easement or deed restriction). e. The proposed action may affect institutional control measures that were put in place Elg, Elh ® ❑ to ensure that the site, remains protective of the environment and human health. f. The proposed action has adequate control measures in place to ensure that future D2t ® ❑ generation, treatment and/or disposal of hazardous wastes will be protective of the environment and human health. g. The proposed action involves construction or modification of a solid waste D2q, Elf ® ❑ management facility. h. The proposed action may result in the unearthing of solid or hazardous waste. D2q, Elf ® ❑ i. The proposed action may result in an increase in the rate of disposal, or processing, of D2r, D2s ® ❑ solid waste. j. The proposed action may result in excavation or other disturbance within 2000 feet of Elf, Elg ® ❑ a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Elh k. The proposed action may result in the migration of explosive gases from a landfill Elf, Elg ® ❑ site to adjacent off site structures. I. The proposed action may result in the release of contaminated leachate from the 132s, Elf, ® ❑ project site. D2r in. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Page 9 of 10 17. Consistency with Community Plans The proposed action is not consistent with adopted land use plans. [:]NO RYES (See Part 1. C.1, C.2. and C.3.) If "Yes ", answer questions a - h. If "No ", go to Section 18. I "Yes ", answer questions a - g. I "No ", proceed to Part 3. Relevant No, or Moderate Moderate Part I small to large to large Question(s) impact impact may impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action's land use components may be different from, or in sharp C2, C3, Dla ® ❑ contrast to, current surrounding land use pattern(s). Ela, Elb b. The proposed action will cause the permanent population of the city, town or village C2 ® ❑ in which the project is located to grow by more than 5%. schools, police and fire) c. The proposed action is inconsistent with local land use plans or zoning regulations. C2, C2, C3 ® ❑ d. The proposed action is inconsistent with any County plans, or other regional land use C2, C2 ® ❑ plans. d. The proposed action may interfere with the use or enjoyment of officially recognized C2, E3 ® e. The proposed action may cause a change in the density of development that is not C3, Dlc, ® ❑ supported by existing infrastructure or is distant from existing infrastructure. Dld, Dlf, C2,0 ® ❑ Dld, Elb f. The proposed action is located in an area characterized by low density development C4, 132c, D2d ® ❑ that will require new or expanded public infrastructure. D2j Ela, Elb g. The proposed action may induce secondary development impacts (e.g., residential or C2a ® ❑ commercial development not included in the proposed action) g. Other impacts: ❑ 1 h. Other: ❑ ❑ 18. Consistency with Community Character The proposed project is inconsistent with the existing community character. [:]NO QYES (See Part 1. C.2, C.3, D.2, E.3) I "Yes ", answer questions a - g. I "No ", proceed to Part 3. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures, or areas De, E3f, E3g ® ❑ of historic importance to the community. b. The proposed action may create a demand for additional community services (e.g. C4 ❑ IZI schools, police and fire) c. The proposed action may displace affordable or low-income housing in an area where C2, C3, Dlf ® ❑ there is a shortage of such housing. D lg, E 1 a d. The proposed action may interfere with the use or enjoyment of officially recognized C2, E3 ® ❑ or designated public resources. e. The proposed action is inconsistent with the predominant architectural scale and C2,0 ® ❑ character. . f. Proposed action is inconsistent with the character of the existing natural landscape. C2, C3 ® ❑ Ela, Elb E2 , E2h g. Other impacts: ❑ 1 ❑ PRINT FALL F®RM Page 10 of 10 Use Project : The Orchards Standard Subdivision Date : 07/07/2015 Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 - Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance of Project Impacts and Determination of Significance Part 3 provides the reasons in support of the determination of significance. The lead agency must complete Part 3 for every question in Part 2 where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not, or may, result in a significant adverse environmental impact. Based on the analysis in Part 3, the lead agency must decide whether to require an environmental impact statement to further assess the proposed action or whether available information is sufficient for the lead agency to conclude that the proposed action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact. By completing the certification on the next page, the lead agency can complete its determination of significance. Reasons Supporting This Determination: To complete this section: • Identify the impact based on the Part 2 responses and describe its magnitude. Magnitude considers factors such as severity, size or extent of an impact. • Assess the importance of the impact. Importance relates to the geographic scope, duration, probability of the impact occurring, number of people affected by the impact and any additional environmental consequences if the impact were to occur. • The assessment should take into consideration any design element or project changes. • Repeat this process for each Part 2 question where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not, or may, result in a significant adverse environmental impact. • Provide the reason(s) why the impact may, or will not, result in a significant adverse environmental impact • For Conditional Negative Declarations identify the specific condition(s) imposed that will modify the proposed action so that no significant adverse environmental impacts will result. • Attach additional sheets, as needed. The Town of Southold Planning Board as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant impact on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. . Type I procedures are required for the review of this Unlisted action due to the lead agency determination that there are potential adverse impacts regarding a sensitive resource(s) within its jurisdiction and the Type I procedures would be more helpful. See attached document. Determination of Significance - Type 1 and Unlisted Actions SEQR Status: El Type 1 ❑✓ Unlisted Identify portions of EAF completed for this Project: 0 Part I © Part 2 © Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF, as noted, plus this additional support information and considering both the magnitude and importance of each identified potential impact, it is the conclusion of the Town of Southold Planning Board as lead agency that: ❑ A. This project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment, and, therefore, an environmental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued. ❑ B. Although this project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, that impact will be avoided or substantially mitigated because of the following conditions which will be required by the lead agency: There will, therefore, be no significant adverse impacts from the project as conditioned, and, therefore, this conditioned negative declaration is issued. A conditioned negative declaration may be used only for UNLISTED actions (see 6 NYCRR 617A). © C. This Project may result in one or more significant adverse impacts on the environment, and an environmental impact statement must be prepared to further assess the impact(s) and possible mitigation and to explore alternatives to avoid or reduce those impacts. Accordingly, this positive declaration is issued. Name of Action: The Orchards Standard Subdivision Name of Lead Agency: Town of Southold Planning Board Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Donald Wilcenski Title of Responsible Officer: Chair .. Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Date: Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) Date: For Further Information: Contact Person: Mark Terry Address: P.O. Box 1179, 5309 State Road 25, Southold, New York 11971 Telephone Number: 631-765-1938 E-mail: Mark.Terry@town.southold.ny.us For Type 1 Actions and Conditioned Negative Declarations, a copy of this Notice is sent to: Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be principally located (e.g., Town / City / Village of) Other involved agencies (if any) Applicant (if any) Environmental Notice Bulletin: littler//www.dec.ny.eov/enb/enb.htini PRINT FULL FORM I Page 2 of 2 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR July 7, 2015 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Thomas McCarthy McCarthy Management, Inc. 46520 County Road 48 Southold, NY 11971 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov Re: Lead Agency - Proposed Standard Subdivision for the Koehler Family Limited Partnership Located at 4180 New Suffolk Avenue, on the corner of Marratooka Road and New Suffolk Avenue, in Mattituck SCTM#1000-115-10-1 Zoning District: R-80 Dear Mr. McCarthy: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolution at a meeting held on Monday, July 6, 2015: WHEREAS, this proposal is a Standard Subdivision of a 14.94 acre parcel into eight lots where Lot 1 equals 0.83 acres inclusive of 0.04 acres of unbuildable lands; Lot 2 equals 0.85 acres inclusive of 0.05 acres of unbuildable lands; Lot 3 equals 1.13 acres inclusive of 0.26 acres of unbuildable lands; Lot 4 equals 0.70 acres; Lot 5 equals 0.66 acres; Lot 6 equals 0.70 acres; Lot 7 equals 0.73 acres; and Lot 8 equals 8.72 acres of Open Space and 0.05 acres of unbuildable lands, located in the R-80 Zoning District. This property includes a proposed road totaling 0.54 acres; and WHEREAS, on February 9, 2015, the Planning Board determined that this proposed action is an Unlisted Action under SEQRA as described above; and WHEREAS, pursuant 6 NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.7 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), the Planning Board coordinated with all involved and interested agencies on January 30, 2015; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Planning Board hereby declares Lead Agency status for the SEQRA review of this'Unlisted Action. Koehler Standard Subdivision [2] July 7, 2015 If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR July 7, 2015 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov Mr. Reginald Tuthill Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Company P.O. Box 86 Orient, NY 11957 Re: SEQR Determination: Positive Declaration - Proposed Conservation Subdivision Open Development Area for the Tuthill Oysterponds Holding Company North Dyer & North Brown are located on the n/s/o NYS Route 25, approximately 366' w/o Oysterponds Lane & approximately 2,223' e/o Platt Road respectively. South Dyer and South Brown are located on the s/s/o NYS Route 25, approximately 460' w/o Oysterponds Lane & approximately 1,960' e/o Platt Road, respectively. All properties are located in Orient. SCTM#1000-17-4-16, 17-6-14.2, 18-3-30.3 and 18-6-17.3 Zoning District: R-80 & R-200 Dear Mr. Tuthill: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolution at a meeting held on Monday, July 6, 2015: WHEREAS, this proposal is for an 80/60 Conservation Subdivision of four parcels SCTM#s 1000-17-4-16, 1000-17-6-14.2, 1000-18-3-30.3 and 1000-18-6-17.3 (total area = 112 acres) into 17 residential lots, with 94 acres to be preserved. This project proposes the transfer of yield pursuant to §240-42 G of the Southold Town Code, and is further described as follows: SCTM#1000-17-4-16 (North Dyer) equals 21 acres proposed to be subdivided into 6 lots where the lots range in size from 0.7 - 0.9 acres. This property includes a 0.7 acres private right-of-way and 15.6 acres of preserved subdivision open space inclusive of 5.7 acres of unbuildable lands. SCTM#1000-17-6-14.2 (South Dyer) equals 35.3 acres proposed to be subdivided into 5 lots and includes a reserve area for agricultural related use where the lots range in size from 0.5 - 0.9 acres; property includes a 0.5 acre right-of-way and 28.5 acres of open space inclusive of 14.6 acres of unbuildable lands. Tu t h i 11 ....�._P a _g_ ......._............... . U.. �. Y......7..._....._2 0-1-5.... SCTM#1000-18-3-30.3 (North Brown) equals 28.7 acres proposed to be subdivided into 5 lots where the lots range in size from 0.7 - 0.8 acres. This property includes a 1.3 acre private right-of-way and 23.7 acres of open space inclusive of 2 acres of unbuildable lands. SCTM#1000-18-6-17.3 (South Brown) equals 26.9 acres proposed to be subdivided where Lot 1 equals 0.92 acres. This property includes 25.5 acres of open space inclusive of 0.62 acre of unbuildable lands; and WHEREAS, The Planning Board recognizes that the applicant has proposed a 80/60 Conservation Subdivision that supports and meets many of the Town's goals; and WHEREAS, due to the environmental, scenic and cultural sensitivity of the hamlet of Orient, the Planning Board has determined that the proposed action may result in a moderate to large impact; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board, as Lead Agency, is requiring the review of the whole action of 17 lots on 4 parcels; and WHEREAS, pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617.4 (b) (8) "Any Unlisted Action that includes a non-agricultural use occurring wholly or partially within an Agricultural District (certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25 -AA, Sections 303 and 304) and exceeds 25 percent of any threshold established in this section" is a Type I Action under SEQRA; and WHEREAS, pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617.4 (b) (5), one of the thresholds established for a Type I Action is the following: "Construction of new residential units that meet or exceed the following thresholds: 50 units not to be connected (at the commencement of habitation) to existing community or public water and sewerage systems including sewage treatment works" and 25 percent of this threshold equals 12.5 residential units; and WHEREAS,'this proposed subdivision includes the potential future construction of 17 new residential units in an area without access to public water and sewerage systems; and WHEREAS, pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617.4 (b) (9), another Type 1 Action is "any Unlisted Action (unless the action is designed for the preservation of the facility or site) occurring wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous to, any historic building, structure, facility, site or district or prehistoric site that is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, or that has been proposed by the New York State Board on Historic Preservation for a recommendation to the State Historic Preservation Officer for nomination for inclusion in the National Register, or that is listed on the State Register of Historic Places (The National Register of Historic Places is established by 36 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Parts 60 and '63, 1994 [see 617.17]"; and T u t i i i! i 31 P a g._a._._ ............ u.. �...Y.._..._7...... 2 1 5 WHEREAS, this proposed subdivision is located substantially contiguous to the Orient National Historic District located to the east of the South Dyer property; and WHEREAS, based upon the above requirements, the Planning Board performed a coordinated review of this Type I Action pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.7 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA); and WHEREAS, on January 12, 2015, the Southold Town Planning Board declared Lead Agency status for the SEQRA review of this action; and WHEREAS, on January 12, 2015, the Southold Town Planning Board classified the action as a Type I Action; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board, as Lead Agency, performed a coordinated review of this Type I Action pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.7 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA); be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Planning Board, pursuant to SEQRA, hereby makes a determination of significance for the proposed action and issues a Positive Declaration for this action. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman Encl. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR Project Numbers: SCTM#1000-17-4-16 SCTM#1000-17-6-14.2 SCTM#1000-18-3-30.3 SCTM#1000-18-6-17.3 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft EIS Determination of Significance MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 www.southoldtownny. gov Date: July 6, 2015 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The Town of Southold Planning Board as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant impact on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. Name of Action: Tuthill Conservation Subdivision SEQR Status: Type 1 —X — Unlisted Scoping: No X Yes _ If yes, indicate how scoping will be conducted: SEQRA Positive Declaration Pae 12 July 6, 2015 Description of Action: This proposal is for an 80/60 Conservation Subdivision of four parcels SCTM#s 1000-17-4-16, 1000-17-6-14.2, 1000-18-3-30.3 and 1000-18-6-17.3 (total area = 112 acres) into 17 residential lots, with 94 acres to be preserved. This project proposes the transfer of yield pursuant to §240-42 G of the Southold Town Code. SCTM#1000-17-4-16 (North Dyer) equals 21 acres proposed to be subdivided into 6 lots where the lots range in size from 0.7 - 0.9 acres. This property includes a 0.7 acres private right-of-way and 15.6 acres of preserved subdivision open space inclusive of 5.7 acres of unbuildable lands. SCTM#1000-17-6-14.2 (South Dyer) equals 35.3 acres proposed to be subdivided into 5 lots and includes a reserve area for agricultural related use where the lots range in size from 0.5 - 0.9 acres; property includes a 0.5 acre right-of-way and 28.5 acres of open space inclusive of 14.6 acres of unbuildable lands. SCTM#1000-18-3-30.3 (North Brown) equals 28.7 acres proposed to be subdivided into 5 lots where the lots range in size from 0.7 - 0.8 acres. This property includes a 1.3 acre private right- of-way and 23.7 acres of open space inclusive of 2 acres of unbuildable lands. SCTM#1000-18-6-17.3 (South Brown) equals 26.9 acres proposed to be subdivided where Lot 1 equals 0.92 acres. This property includes 25.5 acres of open space inclusive of 0.62 acre of unbuildable lands. Location: North Dyer is located on the n/s/o NYS Route 25, approximately 366 feet west of Oysterponds Lane, in Orient. South Dyer is located on the s/s/o NYS Route 25, approximately 460 feet west of Oysterponds Lane, in Orient. North Brown is located on the n/s/o of NYS Route 25, approximately 2,223 east of Platt Road, in Orient. South Brown is located on the s/s/o NYS Route 25, approximately 1,960 feet east of Platt Road, in Orient. Reasons Supporting This Determination: This action is proposed as an 80/60 Conservation Subdivision Open Development Area, a development option that was developed in the Town to meet Town goals. However, the action is located in the hamlet of Orient which is not served by public water or public sewers and the action could result in moderate impacts to the sole source aquifer affecting the local population. Further, moderate impacts could also result to surface waters, agricultural resources, aesthetic resources (scenic view sheds important to the community), archeological resources and community character. The Town of Southold Planning Board is requiring a review of the action to determine the magnitude, importance and probability of occurrence of potential impacts. SEQRA Positive Declaration Pae 13 July 6, 2015 Relevant areas of concern include: 1. Impacts on Surface Water a. The proposed action may affect the water quality of any water bodies within or downstream of the site of the proposed action. Recent studies have linked on-site sanitary systems with contributing Nitrogen to surface waters and cumulative impacts could be moderate to large. In the Peconic Estuary, after atmospheric deposition groundwater is estimated as the second largest external source of Nitrogen totaling 21 percent of the total Nitrogen load, or 7,4501bs./day. Groundwater and other nonpoint sources are the primary contributors to water quality degradation of the Peconic Estuary contributingto o algal blooms and hypoxia (SCDHS). Both the Long Island Sound and Peconic Estuary have experienced detrimental changes from increased nutrient loads to ground and surface waters. In the Long Island Sound, and more recently in the Peconic Estuary, low Dissolved Oxygen (DO) conditions (hypoxia) develop due to excessive levels of Nitrogen and Phosphorous (P). Hypoxia is a result from planktonic algae blooms that feed on the nutrients. The algae die and settle to the bottom of the water body then decay, using up Dissolved Oxygen in the process The Oxygen levels frequently fall below the levels necessary to sustain life and often result in fish and shellfish die offs. The impacts of the new sanitary systems proposed on the South Dyer and South Brown properties must be assessed. In addition the potential magnitude of impact to Long Island Sound and Munn Pond should be discussed for the North Dyer and North Brown properties. 2. Impact on Groundwater a. The potential moderate to large impacts to existing groundwater quality and/or quantity. The proposed action is proposed in an area without access to public water and community (public) sewer. b. The proposed action will require new water supply wells, or create additional demand on supplies from existing water supply wells. The parcels and greater Orient are not served by public water. New private wells served by groundwater will be required to provide potable water to future residences. The action must be assessed to water availability of potable water source and the impacts on existing and future development on groundwater supply. Discussions must include the impact to adjacent parcels (including zone of influences). The threat of salt water intrusion'should also be discussed. c. Water supply demand from the proposed action may exceed safe and sustainable withdrawal capacity rate of the local supply or aquifer. SEQRA Positive Declaration Pae 14 July 6, 2015 The action must be assessed to determine impact on water supply demand of potable groundwater sources for each parcel location. The sustainability of the aquifer and impacts to adjacent parcels and area should also be discussed. d. The proposed action may allow or result in residential uses in areas without water and sewer services. The parcels are located within an area with no public water or sewers. Suffolk County Department of Health Services approvals will be required. Assessment of potential impacts (pharmaceuticals and personal care products) to groundwater from new sanitary systems, fertilizers and herbicides must be included. e. The proposed action will require wastewater discharged to groundwater. The amount of wastewateralbep r day (gpd) that will be discharged to groundwater compliance with Suffolk County Department of Health Services regulations must be provided. f. The proposed action may result in the construction of water supply wells in locations where groundwater is, or is suspected to be, contaminated. Areas of Orient have exhibited groundwater contamination. Recent concerns have been outlined in the Suffolk County Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan (2015). A discussion on current groundwater quality, contamination and potential impacts that may result from the proposed action is required. Potential impacts to adjacent property owners must also be included. g. The proposed action may involve the commercial application of pesticides within 100 feet of potable drinking water or irrigation sources. The proposed lots are located adjacent to active agricultural lands which are included and part of the subdivision. An assessment of the impacts of pesticides within 100 feet of potable drinking water or irrigation sources for lawn and crops must be included. 3. Impact to Flooding a. The proposed action may result in, or require, modification of existing drainage patterns. The nronosed action will change existing drainage patterns, disturb more than one acre and create stormwater run-off (non -point sheet flow) during construction or post construction. Sea level rise and the impact on low lying areas of each parcel (located in the manned flood zoned areas) is a concern. An assessment of the impacts and mitigation roposed must be discussed. 4. Impact on Plants and Animals a. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by any rare, threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the Federal Government. SEQRA Positive Declaration Pae 15 July 6, 2015 The use of the properties by protected species is unknown. If the action is developed vegetation will be removed on North Dyer and North Brown properties. Partial mitigation will be achieved through the requirement of clearing limits on each vegetated parcel The New York State Natural Heritage Program (NY Natural Heritage at NaturalHeritage@dee.ny.gov or (518) 402-8944) must be contacted to determine the presence or absence of protected species and potential impacts (if any) to such species or habitat. 5. Impact on Agricultural Resources The potential moderate to large impacts of a substantial change in the use, or intensity of use, of land including prime agricultural soils, Agricultural District and open space or in its capacity to support existing uses. South Dyer, North Brown and South Brown properties are listed within the Agricultural District. a. The proposed action may impact soil classified within Soil Group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System. The NY Department of Agriculture and Markets has created a Land Classification System based on soils that are used in the Agricultural Assessment Program pursuant to Article 25 -AA of the Agriculture and Markets Law. Soil Groups can be identified at the NYS Ag. and Markets Soil Group Numbers page found at: http://agriculture.py.gov/AP/agservices/soils/2014/suffl4.pdf These soils are prime farmland soils and soils of statewide importance. Impacts to these soils include agriculture areas converted to non-farm (in this case, residential) use. b. The proposed action may sever, cross or otherwise limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc). The residential development of the land will require utilities and roadways that will transverse active agricultural lands. The clustering of lots mitigates the impediments that residential development could result to agricultural lands. The assessment of potential impacts to access agricultural lands must be discussed and any mitigation that has been achieved in the proposed Conservation Subdivision identified and/or proposed. The proposed action may result in the excavation or compaction of the soil profile of active agricultural land. The development of seventeen (17) single family residential lots and associated roadways will result in compaction of the soil profile of active agricultural lands. The assessment must include a discussion on the potential loss of agricultural lands/soils and the mitigation which was achieved by the proposed Conservation Subdivision. d. The proposed action may irreversibly convert agricultural land to non-agricultural uses, either more than 2.5 acres if located in an Agricultural District, or more than 10 acres if not within an Agricultural District. SEQRA Positive Declaration Pae 16 July 6, 2015 617.4(b)(8) requires that the unlisted action be calibrated to 25% of any threshold on the Type I list. The subdivision proposes 17 units and 25% of 50 is 12.5; although not all units would occur in an Agricultural District, the action would partially occur within an Agricultural District and therefore, the action cannot be assessed separately. Note that a total of 11 units are proposed on South Dyer, North and South Brown just under the 12.5 units. South Dyer North Brown and South Brown are listed in an Agricultural District. The proposed action will irreversibly convert 7.28+ acres of agricultural to non-agricultural (residential) use within the district. An assessment on the severity of impacts to the Agricultural District must be discussed. The mitigation resulting from the Conservation Subdivision and amount of land area preserved should be considered. e. The proposed action may disrupt or prevent installation of an Agricultural Land Management System. South Dyer, North Brown and South Brown parcels are all actively farmed. The assessment must include a discussion on the impacts and/or mitigation (if any) which resulted from the proposed Conservation Subdivision. f. The proposed action may result, directly or indirectly, in increased development potential or pressure on farmland. The potential impact of moderate to large impacts to directly increase development must be assessed. g. The proposed project is not consistent with the adopted municipal Farmland Protection Plan. The action will remove acreage from the Town's total available agricultural lands. The consistency with the Southold Town Farm and Farmland Protection Strategy (2000) -and Community Preservation Project Plan (2008) must be discussed. 6. Impacts on Archeological Resources a. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous to, any buildings, archaeological site or district which is listed on or has been nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on the State or National Register of Historic Places. The South Dyer property is adjacent to the Orient National Historic District. Potential moderate to large adverse impacts to the National Historic District must be assessed. b. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous to, an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Archaeological Site Inventory. SEQRA Positive Declaration Pae 17 July 6, 2015 The action is located within an Archeo -sensitive Area. The New York Department of Parks Recreation and Historic Preservation is requiring a Phase I Cultural Assessment for all areas to be developed. The assessment must include the results of the study. The following must also be addressed: i. The proposed action may result in the destruction or alteration of all or part of the site or property_ ii. The proposed action may result in the alteration of the property's setting or integrity. iii. The proposed action may result in the introduction of visual elements which are out of character with the site or property, or may alter its setting. 7. Impacts on Aesthetic Resources. a. Proposed action may be visible from any officially designated federal, state, or local scenic or aesthetic resource. b. The action may impact scenic view sheds identified (in public testimony) as important to the community. Proposed action will be visible from State Route 25, A New York State Desi ng ated . Byway and Orient Harbor. The property known as South Dyer is south of the State Route 25 a New York State Scenic Byway. The scenic view from the roadway has been identified as important by the community and the property owners. In 19XX, the property owners placed a term scenic easement on the property which recognized the scenic importance. The action proposes to construct five (5) single family residential homes on the parcel. The potential impact from the siting and scale of the homes could be moderate to large based on lot size. c. The proposed action may result in the obstruction, elimination or significant screening of one or more officially designated scenic views. Chanter 280 of the Southold Town Code allows lot coverage up to 20% of the buildable land area. The proposed action will be visible from State Route 25, a New York State Designated Byway and Orient Harbor, public waters. The property known as South Dyer is south of the State Route 25 a New York State Scenic Bvwav and north of Orient Harbor. Three other properties also adjoin State Route 25, but the lots and subsequent development is expected to result in low impacts to designated scenic views. d. The proposed action may be visible from publicly accessible vantage points: i. Seasonally (e.g., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) Yes, the projects will be visible on South Dyer seasonally. SEQRA Positive Declaration Pae 18 July 6, 2015 ii. Year Round Yes, the projects will be visible on South Dyer.year round. e. The situation or activity in which viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is: i. Routine travel by residents, including travel to and from work The assessment must include the impacts to travelers of State Route 25 and Orient Harbor. ii. Recreational or tourism based activities The assessment must include the impacts to tourism and recreational participants using State Route 25 and Orient Harbor. f. The proposed action may cause a diminishment of the public enjoyment and appreciation of the designated aesthetic resource. The assessment must discuss the potential moderate to large adverse impacts to aesthetic resources of State Route 25 and Orient Harbor that may result from the action, specifically. 8. Impacts on Critical Environmental Areas a. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quality of the resource or characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. Portions of the South Dyer parcel are located within a NYSDEC Critical Environmental Area (Peconic Bays and Environ). An assessment of the impacts to the area must be discussed. 9. Consistency with Community Plans a. The proposed action's land use components may be different from, or in sharp contrast to, current surrounding land use pattern(s). Current land use of Orient is residential and aariculture. The nrovosed action br000ses seventeen (17) new residential lots on four (4), separate parcels. Lots have been clustered to meet the requirements of the Town of Southold Conservation Subdivision 80/60 Proeram where 80% of buildable lands is reauired to be preserved and the total vield of a arcel is reduced by 60% The action is being proposed as a 80/60 Conservation Subdivision and, therefore, the expected impacts to land use patterns is low. The action sports the existing land use pattern(s) of mixed agricultural and residential uses. 10. Consistency with Community Character SEQRA Positive Declaration Pae 19 July 6, 2015 a. The proposed action may create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire). The action is expected to create a demand for police and fire services. The demand for such services must be discussed. b. The proposed action is inconsistent with the predominant architectural scale and character. The South Dyer property is south of the State Route 25 a New York State Scenic Byway. The -scenic view from the roadway has been identified as important by the community and the property owners. In 2001, the property owners placed a term Scenic Easement on the property which recognized the scenic importance. The action proposes to construct five (5) single family residential homes on the parcel. The potential im >l act from the siting and scale of the homes could be moderate to large based on lot size and Town Code percent cover for building lots. The North Dyer and North Brown development areas clustered to lessen impacts to State Route 25 should also be discussed. 11. The Assessment of a No Action Alternative For Further Information: Contact Person: Mark Terry, Principal Planner Alyxandra Sabatino, Planner Address: P.O. Box 1179, 5309 State Road 25, Southold, New York 11971 Telephone Number: 631-765-1938 A copy of this notice must be sent to: Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Southold Police Department Architectural Review Committee Orient Fire District Environmental Notice Bulletin File Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Department Suffolk County Department of Public Works NYS DEC — Stony Brook NYS DEC - Commissioner NYS Department of Transportation NYS Department of State US Army Corps. of Engineers Any person requesting a copy Agency Use Only [If applicable] Full Environmental Assessment Form Project: JTUthiflConservaton Subdivision Part 2 - Identification of Potential Project Impacts Date: 6119115 Part 2 is to be completed by the lead agency. Part 2 is designed to help the lead agency inventory all potential resources that could be affected by a proposed project or action. We recognize that the lead agency's reviewer(s) will not necessarily be environmental professionals. So, the questions are designed to walk a reviewer through the assessment process by providing a series of questions that can be answered using the information found in Part 1. To further assist the- lead agency in completing Part 2, the form identifies the most relevant questions in Part 1 that will provide the information needed to answer the Part 2 question. When Part 2 is completed, the lead agency will have identified the relevant environmental areas that may be impacted by the proposed activity. If the lead agency is a state agency and the action is in any Coastal Area, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Tips for completing Part 2: • Review all of the information provided in Part 1. • Review any application, maps, supporting materials and the Full EAF Workbook. • Answer each of the 18 questions in Part 2. • If you answer "Yes" to a numbered question, please complete all the questions that follow in that section. • If you answer "No" to a numbered question, move on to the next numbered question. • Check appropriate column to indicate the anticipated size of the impact. • Proposed projects that would exceed a numeric threshold contained in a question should result in the reviewing agency checking the box "Moderate to large impact may occur." • The reviewer is not expected to be an expert in environmental analysis. • If you are not sure or undecided about the size of an impact, it may help to review the sub -questions for the general question and consult the workbook. • When answering a question consider all components of the proposed activity, that is, the "whole action". • Consider the possibility for long-term and cumulative impacts as well as direct impacts. • Answer the question in a reasonable manner considering the scale and context of the project. 1. Impact on Land Proposed action may involve construction on, or physical alteration of, ❑NO ®YES the land surface of the proposed site. (See Part 1. D.1) I "Yes ", answer questions a J. I "No ", move on to Section 2. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may involve construction on land where depth to water table is less than 3 feet. E2d ❑ ❑ b. The proposed action may involve construction on slopes of 15% or greater. E2f ® ❑ c. The proposed action may involve construction on land where bedrock is exposed, or Eta ® ❑ generally within 5 feet of existing ground surface. d. The proposed action may involve the excavation and removal of more than 1,000 tons D2a ® ❑ of natural material. e. The proposed action may involve construction that continues for more than one year Dle ® ❑ or in multiple phases. f. The proposed action may result in increased erosion, whether from physical D2e, D2q ® ❑ disturbance or vegetation removal (including from treatment by herbicides). g. The proposed action is, or may be, located within a Coastal Erosion hazard area. B 1 i ® ❑ h. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Page 1 of 10 2. Impact on Geological Features The proposed action may result in the modification or destruction of, or inhibit access to, any unique or unusual land forms on the site (e.g., cliffs, dunes, F1 NO ®YES minerals, fossils, caves). (See Part 1. E.2.g) I "Yes ", answer questions a - c. I "No ", move on to Section 3. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. Identify the specific land form(s) attached: E2g ® ❑ Coastal Bluff Along Long Island Sound D2b ® ❑ 10 acre increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water. b. The proposed action may affect or is adjacent to a geological feature listed as a E3c ® ❑ registered National Natural Landmark. ® ❑ from a wetland or water body. Specific feature: d. The proposed action may involve construction within or adjoining a freshwater or c. Other impacts: ® ❑ ❑ 3. Impacts on Surface Water The proposed action may affect one or more wetlands or other surface water ❑ NO OYES bodies (e.g., streams, rivers, ponds or lakes). (See Part 1. D.2, E.21) I "Yes ", answer questions a -1. I "No ", move on to Section 4. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may create a new water body. 132b, D1h ® ❑ b. The proposed action may result in an increase or decrease of over 10% or more than a D2b ® ❑ 10 acre increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water. c. The proposed action may involve dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material 132a ® ❑ from a wetland or water body. d. The proposed action may involve construction within or adjoining a freshwater or E2h ® ❑ tidal wetland, or in the bed or banks of any other water body. e. The proposed action may create turbidity in a waterbody, either from upland erosion, 132a, 132h ® ❑ runoff or by disturbing bottom sediments. f. The proposed action may include construction of one or more intake(s) for withdrawal D2c ® ❑ of water from surface water. g. The proposed action may include construction of one or more outfall(s) for discharge D2d ® ❑ of wastewater to surface water(s). h. The proposed action may cause soil erosion, or otherwise create a source of D2e ® ❑ stormwater discharge that may lead to siltation or other degradation of receiving water bodies. i. The proposed action may affect the water quality of any water bodies within or E2h ❑ IZI downstream of the site of the proposed action. j. The proposed action may involve the application of pesticides or herbicides in or D2q, E2h ® ❑ around any water body. k. The proposed action may require the construction of new, or expansion of existing, D 1 a, D2d ® ❑ wastewater treatment facilities. Page 2 of 10 1. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 4. Impact on groundwater The proposed action may result in new or additional use of ground water, or [:]NO © YES may have the potential to introduce contaminants to ground water or an aquifer. (See Part 1. D.2.a, D.2.c, D.2.d, D.2.p, D.2.q, D.2.t) If "Yes ", answer questions a - h. If "No ", move on to Section 5. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may require new water supply wells, or create additional demand D2c ❑ ❑ on supplies from existing water supply wells. E2j ® ❑ c. The proposed action may result in development within a 500 year floodplain. E2k ® ❑ b. Water supply demand from the proposed action may exceed safe and sustainable D2c ❑ withdrawal capacity rate of the local supply or aquifer. Cite Source: D2b, E2i, ® ❑ c. The proposed action may allow or result in residential uses in areas without water and Dla, D2c ❑ sewer services. E1 e ® ❑ d. The proposed action may include or require wastewater discharged to groundwater. D2d, E21 ❑ e. The proposed action may result in the construction of water supply wells in locations 132c, Elf, ❑ where groundwater is, or is suspected to be, contaminated. Elg, Elh f. The proposed action may require the bulk storage of petroleum or chemical products 132p, E21 ® ❑ over ground water or an aquifer. g. The proposed action may involve the commercial application of pesticides within 100 feet of potable drinking water or irrigation sources. E2h, D2q, E21, D2c ❑ h. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 5. Impact on Flooding The proposed action may result in development on lands subject to flooding. ❑ NO ® YES (See Part 1.. E.2) I "Yes ", answer questions a - g, I "No ", move on to Section 6. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur 'a. The proposed action may result in development in a designated floodway. Eli ® ❑ b. The proposed action may result in development within a 100 year floodplain. E2j ® ❑ c. The proposed action may result in development within a 500 year floodplain. E2k ® ❑ d. The proposed action may result in, or require, modification of existing drainage 132b, D2e ❑ patterns. e. The proposed action may change flood water flows that contribute to flooding. D2b, E2i, ® ❑ E2', E2k f. If there is a dam located on the site of the proposed action, is the dam in need of repair, E1 e ® ❑ or upgrade? Page 3 of 10 g. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 6. Impacts on Air The proposed action may include a state regulated air emission source. ©NO []YES (See Part 1. D.2.f., D,2,h, D.2.g) If "Yes ", answer questions a -f If "No ", move on to Section 7. Relevant Relevant No, or Moderate Part I Part I small to large Question(s) Question(s) impact impact may may occur may occur occur a. If the proposed action requires federal or state air emission permits, the action may ® ❑ threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the Federal also emit one or more greenhouse gases at or above the following levels: government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. L More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide (CO2) D2g ❑ ❑ ii. More than 3.5 tons/year of nitrous oxide (N20) iii. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon equivalent of perfluorocarbons (PFCs) iv. More than .045 tons/year of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) v. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide equivalent of hydrochloroflourocarbons (BFCs) emissions vi. 43 tons/year or more of methane D2g D2g D2g U2g D2h ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ b. The proposed action may generate 10 tons/year or more of any one designated D2g ❑ ❑ hazardous air pollutant, or 25 tons/year or more of any combination of such hazardous government. air pollutants. c. The proposed action may require a state air registration, or may produce an emissions rate of total contaminants that may exceed 5 lbs. per hour, or may include a heat D2f, D2g ❑ ❑ source capable of producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. ® ❑ species of special concern or conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. d. The proposed action may reach 50% of any of the thresholds in "a" through "c", D2g ❑ ❑ above. ® ❑ any.species of special concern and conservation need, as listed by New York State or e. The proposed action may result in the combustion or thermal treatment of more than 1 D2s ❑ ❑ ton of refuse per hour. f. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 7. Impact on Plants and Animals The proposed action may result in a loss of flora or fauna. (See Part 1. E.2. m. -q.) NO YES I "Yes ", answer questions a J. I "No ", move on to Section 8. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may cause reduction in population or loss of individuals of any Ego ® ❑ threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. b. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2o ❑ any rare, threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the federal government. c. The proposed action may cause reduction in population, or loss of individuals, of any E2p ® ❑ species of special concern or conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. d. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2p ® ❑ any.species of special concern and conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government. Page 4 of 10 e. The proposed action may diminish the capacity of a registered National Natural Landmark to support the biological community it was established to protect. E3c ® ❑ f. The proposed action may result in the removal of, or ground disturbance in, any portion of a designated significant natural community. Source: E2n ® ❑ Part I g. The proposed action may substantially interfere with nesting/breeding, foraging, or over -wintering habitat for the predominant species that occupy or use the project site. E2m ® ❑ h. The proposed action requires the conversion of more than 10 acres of forest, grassland or any other regionally or locally important habitat. Habitat type & information source: Elb ❑ ❑ L Proposed action (commercial, industrial or recreational projects, only) involves use of herbicides or pesticides. D2q ® ❑ j. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 8. Impact on Agricultural Resources The proposed action may impact agricultural resources. (See Part 1. E.3.a. and b.) [—]NO YES I "Yes ", answer questions a - h. I "No ", move on to Section 9. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may impact soil classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the E2c, E3b ❑ NYS Land Classification System. b. The proposed action may sever, cross or otherwise limit access to agricultural land Ela, Elb ❑ (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc). c. The proposed action may result in the excavation or compaction of the soil profile of E3b ❑ active agricultural land. d. The proposed action may irreversibly convert agricultural land to non-agricultural Elb, E3a ❑ uses, either more than 2.5 acres if located in an Agricultural District, or more than 10 acres if not within an Agricultural District. e. The proposed action may disrupt or prevent installation of an agricultural land El a, Elb ® ❑ management system. f. The proposed action may result, directly or indirectly, in increased development C2c, C3, ❑ potential or pressure on farmland. 132c, D2d g. The proposed project is not consistent with the adopted municipal Farmland C2c ❑ Protection Plan. h. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Page 5 of 10 9. Impact on Aesthetic Resources The land use of the proposed action are obviously different from, or are in []NO VIYES sharp contrast to, current land use patterns between the proposed project and a scenic or aesthetic resource. (Part 1. E. La, E. Lb, E.3.h.) I "Yes ", answer questions a - g. I "No ", go to Section 10. No, or Relevant No, or Moderate small Part I small to large impact Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur may occur occur a. Proposed action may be visible from any officially designated federal, state, or local E3h ❑ scenic or aesthetic resource. nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on the State or b. The proposed action may result in the obstruction, elimination or significant E3h, C2b ❑ screening of one or more officially designated scenic views. b. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous E3f c. The proposed action may be visible from publicly accessible vantage points: E3h to, an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic i. Seasonally (e.g., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) ❑ ii. Year round ❑ E39 d. The situation or activity in which viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed E3h to, an archaeological site not included on the NY SHPO inventory. action is: E2q, Source: L Routine travel by residents, including travel to and from work ElElc ii. Recreational or tourism based activities ❑ IZI e. The proposed action may cause a diminishment of the public enjoyment and E3h ❑ appreciation of the designated aesthetic resource. f. There are similar projects visible within the following distance of the proposed Dla, Ela, ® ❑ project: Dlf, Dlg 0-1/2 mile %z -3 mile 3-5 mile 5+ mile g. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 10. Impact on Historic and Archeological Resources The proposed action may occur in or adjacent to a historic or archaeological [:]NO 0✓ YES resource. (Part 1. E.3.e, f. and g.) If "Yes ", answer questions a - e. If "No ", go to Section 11. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous De ❑ 21 to, any buildings, archaeological site or district which is listed on or has been nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on the State or National Register of Historic Places. b. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous E3f ❑ to, an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory. c.,The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous E39 ® ❑ to, an archaeological site not included on the NY SHPO inventory. Source: Page 6 of 10 d. Other impacts: The proposed action may result in a loss of recreational opportunities or a [:]NO [ZYES ❑ ❑ (See Part 1. C.2.c, E.l.c., E.2.q.) e. If any of the above (a -d) are answered "Yes", continue with the following questions Moderate Relevant No, or to help support conclusions in Part 3: to large Part I small i. The proposed action may result in the destruction or alteration of all or part Me, E3g, ❑ ❑ of the site or property. E3f a. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource or may occur ii. The proposed action may result in the alteration of the property's setting or Me, E3f, ❑ m integrity. E3g, Ela, E2h, E3d ❑ Elb E2m, Ego, iii. The proposed action may result in the introduction of visual elements which are out of character with the site or property, or may alter its setting. De, E3f, E3g, E3h, ❑ ❑ C2, C3 C2a, Elc, ® 11. Impact on Open Space and Recreation The proposed action may result in a loss of recreational opportunities or a [:]NO [ZYES reduction of an open space resource as designated in any adopted municipal open space plan. (See Part 1. C.2.c, E.l.c., E.2.q.) I "Yes ", answer questions a - e. I "No ", go to Section 12. Moderate Relevant No, or Moderate to large Part I small to large impact may Question(s) impact impact may occur a. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource or may occur occur a. The proposed action may result in an impairment of natural functions, or "ecosystem D2e, Elb m ❑ services", provided by an undeveloped area, including but not limited to stormwater E2h, E3d ❑ storage, nutrient cycling, wildlife habitat. E2m, Ego, E2n, E2 ❑ b. The proposed action may result in the loss of a current or future recreational resource. C2a, Elc, ® ❑ C2c, E2 c. The proposed action may eliminate open space or recreational resource in an area C2a, C2c m ❑ with few such resources. Elc, E2q d. The proposed action may result in loss of an area now used informally by the C2c, Elc m ❑ community as an open space resource. e. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 12. Impact on Critical Environmental Areas The proposed action may be located within or adjacent to a critical ❑ NO ❑✓ YES environmental area (CEA). (See Part 1. E.3.d) I "Yes ", answer questions a - c. I "No ", go to Section 13. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource or E3d m ❑ characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. b. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quality of the resource or E3d ❑ m characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. c. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Page 7 of 10 13. Impact on Transportation The proposed action may result in a change to existing transportation systems. []NO YES (See Part 1. D.2.j) I "Yes ", answer questions a - g. 1 "No ", go to Section 14. I "Yes ", answer questions a - e. I "No ", go to Section 15. Relevant No, or Moderate Moderate Part I small to large to large Question(s) impact impact may impact may may occur occur a. Projected traffic increase may exceed capacity of existing road network. D2j ® ❑ b. The proposed action may result in the construction of paved parking area for 500 or D2j ® ❑ more vehicles. or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two-family residences or to serve a D1q, D2k ® c. The proposed action will degrade existing transit access. D2j ® ❑ d. The proposed action will degrade existing pedestrian or bicycle accommodations. D2j ® ❑ e. The proposed action may alter the present pattern of movement of people or goods. D2j ® ❑ f. Other impacts: feet of building area when completed. ❑ ❑ 14. Impact on Energy The proposed action may cause an increase in the use of any form of energy. ONO ©YES (See Part 1. D.21) I "Yes ", answer questions a - e. I "No ", go to Section 15. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action will require a new, or an upgrade to an existing, substation. D2k ® ❑ b. The proposed action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission D1f, ® ❑ or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two-family residences or to serve a D1q, D2k ® ❑ commercial or industrial use. c. The proposed action may utilize more than 2,500 MWhrs per year of electricity. D2k ® ❑ d. The proposed action may involve heating and/or cooling of more than 100,000 square Dlg ® ❑ feet of building area when completed. e. Other Impacts: ❑ ❑ 15. Impact on Noise, Odor, and Light The proposed action may result in an increase in noise, odors, or outdoor lighting. [:]NO ©YES (See Part 1. D.2.m., n., and o.) I "Yes ", answer questions a -f I "No ", go to Section 16. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may produce sound above noise levels established by local D2m ® ❑ regulation. b. The proposed action may result in blasting within 1,500 feet of any residence, D2m, Eld ® ❑ hospital, school, licensed day care center, or nursing home. c. The proposed action may result in routine odors for more than one hour per day. D2o 1 ® ❑ Page 8 of 10 d. The proposed action may result in light shining onto adjoining properties. D2n ® ❑ e. The proposed action may result in lighting creating sky -glow brighter than existing area conditions. D2n, Ela ® ❑ f. Other impacts: small ❑ ❑ Question(s) 16. Impact on Human Health The proposed action may have an impact on human health from exposure ❑ NO ©YES to new or existing sources of contaminants. (See Part 1.D.2.q., E.1. d. f. g. and h.) I "Yes", answer questions a. - m. If "No ", go to Section 17. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may cccur occur a. The proposed action is located within 1500 feet of a school, hospital, licensed day Eld ® ❑ care center, group home, nursing home or retirement community. b. The site of the proposed action is currently undergoing remediation. Elg, Elh ® ❑ c. There is a completed emergency spill remediation, or a completed environmental site Elg, Elh ® ❑ remediation on, or adjacent to, the site of the proposed action. d. The site of the action is subject to an institutional control limiting the use of the Elg, Elh ® ❑ property (e.g., easement or deed restriction). e. The proposed action may affect institutional control measures that were put in place Elg, Elh ® ❑ to ensure that the site remains protective of the environment and human health. f. The proposed action has adequate control measures in place to ensure that future D2t ® ❑ generation, treatment and/or disposal of hazardous wastes will be protective of the environment and human health. g. The proposed action involves construction or modification of a solid waste D2q, Elf ® ❑ management facility. h. The proposed action may result in the unearthing of solid or hazardous waste. D2q, Elf ® ❑ L The proposed action may result in an increase in the rate of disposal, or processing, of D2r, D2s ® ❑ solid waste. j. The proposed action may result in excavation or other disturbance within 2000 feet of Elf, Elg ® ❑ a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Elh k. The proposed action may result in the migration of explosive gases from a landfill Elf, Elg ® ❑ site to adjacent off site structures. 1. The proposed action may result in the release of contaminated leachate from the D2s, Elf, ® ❑ project site. D2r in. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Page 9 of 10 17. Consistency with Community Plans The proposed action is not consistent with adopted land use plans. [JNO W]YES (See Part 1. C.1, C.2. and C.3.) If "Yes ", answer questions a - h. If "No ", go to Section 18. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action's land use components may be different from, or in sharp C2, C3, Dla ❑ ❑ contrast to, current surrounding land use pattern(s). Ela, Elb b. The proposed action will cause the permanent population of the city, town or village C2 ® ❑ in which the project is located to grow by more than 5%. c. The proposed action is inconsistent with local land use plans or zoning regulations. C2, C2, C3 ® ❑ d. The proposed action is inconsistent with any County plans, or other regional land use C2, C2 ® ❑ plans. Dlg, El a e. The proposed action may cause a change in the density of development that is not C3, Dlc, ® ❑ supported by existing infrastructure or is distant from existing infrastructure. Dld, Dlf, e. The proposed action is inconsistent with the predominant architectural scale and Dld, Elb ❑ IZI f. The proposed action is located in an area characterized by low density development C4, D2c, D2d ® ❑ that will require new or expanded public infrastructure. D2j ® ❑ g. The proposed action may induce secondary development impacts (e.g., residential or C2a ® ❑ commercial development not included in the proposed action) E2g, E2h h. Other: ❑ ❑ 18. Consistency with Community Character The proposed project is inconsistent with the existing community character. ONO AYES (See Part 1. C.2, C.3, D.2, E.3) I "Yes ", answer questions a - g. I "No ", proceed to Part 3. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures, or areas De, E3f, E3g ® ❑ of historic importance to the community. b. The proposed action may create a demand for additional community services (e.g. C4 ❑ schools, police and fire) c. The proposed action may displace affordable or low-income housing in an area where C2, C3, Dlf ® ❑ there is a shortage of such housing. Dlg, El a d. The proposed action may interfere with the use or enjoyment of officially recognized C2, E3 ® ❑ or designated public resources. e. The proposed action is inconsistent with the predominant architectural scale and C2, C3 ❑ IZI character. f. Proposed action is inconsistent with the character of the existing natural landscape. C2, C3 ® ❑ Ela, Elb E2g, E2h g. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ PRINT FULL FORM Page 10 of 10 Use Project: ITuthill Conservation Subdivision Date: —in710 as Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 - Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance of Project Impacts and Determination of Significance Part 3 provides the reasons in support of the determination of significance. The lead agency must complete Part 3 for every question in Part 2 where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not, or may, result in a significant adverse environmental impact. Based on the analysis in Part 3, the lead agency must decide whether to require an environmental impact statement to further assess the proposed action or whether available information is sufficient for the lead agency to conclude that the proposed action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact. By completing the certification on the next page, the lead agency can complete its determination of significance. Reasons Supporting This Determination: To complete this section: • Identify the impact based on the Part 2 responses and describe its magnitude. Magnitude considers factors such as severity, size or extent of an impact. • Assess the importance of the impact. Importance relates to the geographic scope, duration, probability of the impact occurring, number of people affected by the impact and any additional environmental consequences if the impact were to occur. • The assessment should take into consideration any design element or project changes. • Repeat this process for each Part 2 question where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not, or may, result in a significant adverse environmental impact. • Provide the reason(s) why the impact may, or will not, result in a significant adverse environmental impact • For Conditional Negative Declarations identify the specific condition(s) imposed that will modify the proposed action so that no significant adverse environmental impacts will result. • Attach additional sheets, as needed. See attached document. Determination of Significance - Type 1 and Unlisted Actions SEQR Status: ❑✓ Type 1 ❑ Unlisted Identify portions of EAF completed for this Project: 0 Part 1 ❑✓ Part 2 ❑y/ Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF, as noted, plus this additional support information and considering both the magnitude and importance of each identified potential impact, it is the conclusion of the Town of Southold Planning Board as lead agency that: ❑ A. This project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment, and, therefore, an environmental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued. ❑ B. Although this project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, that impact will be avoided or substantially mitigated because of the following conditions which will be required by the lead agency: There will, therefore, be no significant adverse impacts from the project as conditioned, and, therefore, this conditioned negative declaration is issued. A conditioned negative declaration may be used only for UNLISTED actions (see 6 NYCRR 617.d). ✓❑ C. This Project may result in one or more significant adverse impacts on the environment, and an environmental impact statement must be prepared to further assess the impact(s) and possible mitigation and to explore alternatives to avoid or reduce those impacts. Accordingly, this positive declaration is issued. Name of Action: Tuthill Conservation Subdivision Name of Lead Agency: Town of Southold Planning Board Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Donald Wilcenski Title of Responsible Officer: Chair Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: .. ; f r Date: 7/—.0/ .0/f� v Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) Date: ,7 0 For Further Information: tov Contact Person: Mark Terry Address: P.O. Box 1179, 5309 State Road 25, Southold, New York 11971 Telephone Number: 631-765-1938 E-mail: Mark.Terry@town.southold.ny.us For Type 1 Actions and Conditioned Negative Declarations, a copy of this Notice is sent to: Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be principally located (e.g., Town / City / Village of) Other involved agencies (if any) Applicant (if any) Environmental Notice Bulletin: http://www.dec.nv.p-ovlenbfeiib.litinl PRINT FULL FORM I Page 2 of 2 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR July 7, 2015 Mr. Ray Nemschick 160 Main Street Sayville, NY 11782 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov Re: . Approval - Proposed Site Plan for Creative Courses Catering, LLC 41150 County Road 48, ±850' s/w/o CR 48 & Tuckers La., Southold SCTM#1000-59-10-4 Zoning District: LB Dear Mr. Nemschick: The following resolutions were adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, July 6, 2015: WHEREAS, this proposed Site Plan is for the renovation and conversion of an existing 60'x 40'(2,400 sq. ft.) masonry building, formerly a machine shop, to a 16 seat take-out restaurant with six (6) parking stalls on .33 acres in the LB Zoning District; and WHEREAS, on November 19, 2014, Ray Nemschick, agent to the applicant, submitted an application for Site Plan review; and WHEREAS, on December 1, 2014, the Planning Board formally accepted the application as complete for review; and WHEREAS, on December 2, 2014, the Planning Board, pursuant to Southold Town Code §280-131 C., distributed the application to the required agencies for their comments; and WHEREAS, the proposed action is exempt from Suffolk County Planning Commission review because the proposed addition is less than 1,000 square feet with no change to use or occupancy; and WHEREAS, on December 10, 2014, the Southold Town Fire Inspector reviewed and determined that there was adequate fire protection and emergency access for the site; and �r Creative Courses LLC Page 2 July 7, 2015 WHEREAS, on December 12, 2014, the Southold Fire District determined there was adequate fire protection for the site; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 2014, the Southold Town Engineer reviewed the above -referenced application and has determined that the proposed drainage meets the minimum requirements of Chapter 236 for Storm Water Management; and WHEREAS, on January 12, 2015, a public hearing was held and closed; and WHEREAS, on January 22, 2015, the Town of Southold LWRP Coordinator reviewed the above -referenced project and has determined the proposed project to be consistent with Southold Town LWRP policies; and WHEREAS, on January 26, 2015, the applicant was required to obtain a Highway Work Permit from the Suffolk County Department of Public Works (SCDPW) to provide a safe turning lane for westbound traffic into the proposed site; and WHEREAS, on February 9, 2015, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) 6 NYCRR, Part 617.5 (c), determined that the proposed action is a Type II Action as it falls within the following description for 6 NYCRR, Part 617.5(c)(7): construction or expansion of a primary or accessory/appurtenant, non-residential structure or facility involving less than 4,000 square feet of gross floor area and not involving a change in zoning or a Use Variance and consistent with local land use controls, but not radio communication or microwave transmission facilities. The action is for interior renovations and to construct an 8' x 12' concrete pad for a walk-in cooler in the location of an existing concrete pad and not subject to review under SEQRA; and WHEREAS, on February 25, 2015, the Planning Board granted permission for the applicant to commence interior work to the building necessary to opening the proposed kitchen in order to support an existing catering business prior to Site Plan approval. The catering business operates off site and no public is permitted on site until Site Plan approval has been received and the turning lane has been provided pursuant to the SCDPW; and WHEREAS, on May 11, 2015, the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) granted Approval Reference #C10-14-006 for "Wet Store (16 seat maximum; single serve only)" at 402 gallons per day; and WHEREAS, on June 11, 2015, the Suffolk County Department of Public Works (SCDPW) approved a plan to re -stripe County Road 48 to provide a turning lane for westbound traffic into the proposed site; and WHEREAS, on June 15, 2015, the Southold Town Planning Board determined that all applicable requirements of the Site Plan Regulations, Article XXIV,. §280 — Site Plan Approval of the Town of Southold, have been met; and y Creative Courses LLC Page 3 July 7, 2015 WHEREAS, on July 6, 2015, the Southold Town Chief Building Inspector reviewed and certified the proposed Site Plan as a permitted use in the LB Zoning District; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board has determined that this proposed action is consistent with the policies of the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grants Approval with one (1) condition to the Site Plan entitled "Creative Courses", prepared by Raymond W. Nemschick on August 8, 2014, last revised September 17, 2014, and authorizes the Chairman to endorse the Site Plan including the following two (2) plans: 1. SP -1 Plot Plan and Calculations 2. SP -2 Details Condition: Obtain and execute a 239-F from the Suffolk County Department of Public Works (SCDPW) to change the striping of County Road 48 to create a turning lane prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Please also note the following requirements in the Southold Town Code relating to Site Plans: Any outdoor lighting shall be shielded so the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light and glare within property boundaries. 2. All storm water run-off from grading, driveways and gravel areas must be contained on site. 3. Proposed storm water run-off containment systems must be inspected by the Town Engineer at the time of installation. Please call the Southold Town Engineer prior to beginning this work. 4. Approved Site Plans are valid for eighteen months from the date of approval, within which time all proposed work must be completed, unless the Planning Board grants an extension. 5. Any changes from the Approved Site Plan shall require Planning Board approval. 6. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Planning Board must inspect the site to ensure it is in conformity with the Approved Site Plan, and issue a final site inspection approval letter. Should the site be found not in conformance with the Approved Site Plan, no Certificate of Occupancy may be issued unless the Planning Board approves the changes to the plan. Creative Courses LLC Page 4 July 7, 2015 A copy of the Approved Site Plan is enclosed for your records. One copy will also be sent to the Building Department and the Town Engineer/Highway Department. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman Encl. cc: Building Dept. w/map Town Engineer w/map By signing this letter, the applicant acknowledges that there are Town Code requirements and conditions, including those listed above, that must be satisfied prior to the issuance of a Ceftificate of Occupancy. Signature: Date: 16, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR- July 7, 2015 Nancy Steelman, R.A. 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 OF SOUr�,o� � O �yCOUNT`I PLANNING BOARD OFFICE . TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov Re: Extension of Final Approval - Approved Site Plan for Purita Winery Located at 19110 Soundview Avenue, Southold SCTM#1000-51-3-4.11 Zoning District: A -C Dear Mr. Purita: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on July 6, 2015: WHEREAS, this Site Plan is for the alteration and expansion of existing buildings into a new winery totaling 6,304 sq. ft. which includes 267 sq. ft. of office, 347 sq. ft. of retail, 3,249 sq. ft. of tasting room, 671 sq. ft. of storage area, 1,770 sq. ft. of production area and stone terrace with 25 parking spaces on a 3.7431 -acre parcel in the A=C Zone located on the n/s/o Old North Road, approximately 286 ft. w/o County Road 48, known as 19110 Old North Road, in Southold. SCTM#1000-51-3-4.11; and WHEREAS, on March 10, 2008, the Planning Board granted Approval to the Site Plan entitled "Renovations and Additions to the Purita Winery", prepared by Nancy L. Steelman, R.A., originally dated October 8, 2007 and last revised March 7, 2008; and WHEREAS, on March 10, 2011, the Site Plan Approval expired; and WHEREAS, on April 21, 2015, the Planning Board sent the applicant a notice that Site Plan Approval had expired and requesting a response in writing or the application would be considered withdrawn; and WHEREAS, on May 22, 2015, Nancy Steelman, agent, submitted a letter requesting an Extension of Site Plan Approval; and Purita Winery 2 July 7, 2015 WHEREAS, at a Work Session held on July 6, 2015, the Planning Board reviewed the application and determined the expired Site Plan is in compliance with current rules and regulations; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grants an Extension of Site Plan Approval from March 10, 2011 to January 14, 2017 on the Site Plan entitled "Renovations and Additions to the Purita Winery", prepared by Nancy L. Steelman, R.A., originally dated October 8, 2007 and last revised March 7, 2008 with the following two (2) conditions: Conditions: 1. Provide a Photometric Plan pursuant to §172 of the Town Code that includes foot candle values for all proposed exterior light fixtures; 2. Revise the parking calculations on the Site Plan by rounding up to the nearest whole number to determine the amount of required spaces and provide the number of employees in lieu of the light industrial parking calculation. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, d Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR July 7, 2015 Charles Cuddy, Esq. P.O. Box 1547 Riverhead, NY 11901 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179. Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938' www.southoldtownny.gov Re: Set Hearing/SEQRA Classification — Site Plan for A+S Southold Oil Gas Station Canopy 49670 NYS Rt. 25, corner of NYS Rt. 25 & Main Bayview Road, Southold SCTM#1000-70-7-4 Dear Mr. Cuddy: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolutions at a meeting held on Monday, July 6, 2015: WHEREAS, this Amended Site Plan is for the construction of a 1,568 sq. ft. canopy pursuant to ZBA File #6757 to cover the existing fuel pumps on 0.3 .acres in the General Business (B) Zoning District, Southold; and WHEREAS, .the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) 6 NYCRR, Part 617, has determined that the proposed action is an Unlisted Action as it does not meet any of the thresholds of a Type I Action, nor does it meet any of the criteria on the Type II list of actions; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board has determined that this proposed action is an Unlisted Action under SEQRA as described above; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board sets Monday, August 3, 2015 at 6:01 p.m. for a Public Hearing regarding the Site Plan entitled "Proposed Canopy Addition to Existing Gasoline Sales Station", prepared by Garrett A. Strang, Registered Architect, dated November 12, 2013 and last revised June 1, 2015. Please refer to the enclosed copy of Chapter 55, Notice of Public Hearing, in regard to the Town's notification procedure. The notification form is enclosed for your use. The sign and the post will need to be picked up at the Planning Board Office, Southold Town Annex. A & S Oil Pae 12 July 7; 2015 Please return the enclosed Affidavit of Posting along with the certified mailing receipts AND the signed green return receipt cards before 12:00 noon on Friday, July 31st. The sign and the post need to be returned to the Planning Board Office after the public hearing is closed. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman Encls. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR July 7, 2015 Mr. Charles Cuddy P.O. Box 1547 Riverhead, NY 11901 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov Re: Set Hearing — Site Plan for Southold Gas Station & Convenience Store 45450 County Road 48-, s/w corner of CR 48 and Youngs Avenue, Southold SCTM#1000-55.-5-2.2 Zoning District: B Dear Mr. Cuddy: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolutions at a meeting held on Monday, July 6, 2015: WHEREAS, this Amended Site Plan is for the proposed conversion of an existing 3,476 sq. ft. building (formerly for vehicle detailing, RV sales and servicing) to a convenience store and vehicle fuel sales, with: 6 fuel pumps (12 fueling stations), two canopies, one at 50'x 24' (1,200 sq. ft.) and the other at 50' x 50' (2,500 sq. ft.) and 29 parking spaces on 1.46 acres in the General Business (B) Zoning District, Southold; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) 6 NYCRR, Part 617, has determined that the proposed action is an Unlisted Action as it does not meet any of the thresholds of a Type I Action, nor does it meet any of the criteria on the Type II list of actions; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board has determined that this proposed action is an Unlisted Action under SEQRA as described above; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board sets Monday, August 3, 2015 at 6:02 p.m. for a Public Hearing regarding the Site Plan entitled "Proposed Alterations to Building for Southold Property", prepared by Garrett A. Strang, Registered Architect, dated May 9, 2015 and last revised June 25, 2015. Southold Gas Station Pae 12 July 7, 2015 Please refer to the enclosed copy of Chapter 55, Notice of Public Hearing, in regard to the Town's notification procedure. The notification form is enclosed for your use. The sign and the post will need to be picked up at the Planning Board Office, Southold Town Annex. Please return the enclosed Affidavit of Posting along with the certified mailing receipts AND the signed green return receipt cards before 12:00 noon on Friday, July 31st. The sign and the post need to be returned to the Planning Board Office after the public hearing is closed. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman Encls. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR July 7, 2015 John -Coughlin, Esq. 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtowimy.gov Re: SEQRA Determination — Proposed Site Plan & Special Exception for Mattituck Fire District Telecommunications Facility 1000 Pike Street, on the s/w corner of Pike Street & Wickham Avenue, Mattituck SCTM#1000-140-3-11.1 'Zoning District: Hamlet Business Dear Mr. Coughlin: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolution at a meeting held on Monday, July 6, 2015: WHEREAS, this proposed wireless communications Site Plan is to replace an existing ±84' communications tower with a 120' antenna support structure/tower with associated equipment and a generator to be mounted on the roof of the existing firehouse. There are ±14,370 sq. ft. of existing buildings including the main fire house and associated accessory structures, all on 1.38 acres in the Hamlet Business Zoning District, Mattituck; and. WHEREAS, the applicant submitted a revised application for Site Plan review on January 21, 2015; and WHEREAS, on May 18, 2015, the Planning Board accepted the application for review; and WHEREAS, on June 1, 2015, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) 6 NYCRR, Part 617, determined that the proposed action is an Unlisted Action as it does not meet any of the thresholds of a Type I Action, nor does it meet any of the criteria on the Type II list of actions; and WHEREAS, on June 1, 2015, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act §617.6, established itself as Lead Agency for this Unlisted Action; and Mattituck Fire District Pae 12 July 7, 2015 WHEREAS, on June 11, 2015, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to §617.6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiated the SEAR lead agency coordination process for this Unlisted Action; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, as Lead Agency pursuant to SEQRA, hereby makes a determination of non -significance for the proposed action and grants a Negative Declaration. A copy of the Negative Declaration is enclosed for your records. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman Encls. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non -Significance MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www. southoldtownny. gov - -__ ....- - - - - - --- --___ -------...-------July-6; 201.5-- -_-- ----- ------------ --- ---- ------ This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Mattituck Fire District Telecommunications Facility SCTM#: 1000-140-3-11.1 Location: S/w corner of Pike Street & Wickham Avenue, Mattituck S.EQR Status: Type I () Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes () No (X) Description of Action: This proposed wireless communications Site Plan is to replace an existing ±84' communications tower with a 120' antenna support structure/tower with associated equipment and a generator to be mounted on the roof of the existing firehouse. There are ±14,370 sq. ft. of existing buildings including the main fire house and associated accessory structures, all on 1.38 acres in the Hamlet Business Zoning District, Mattituck. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to. the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. /•tom /'`.,_ ; •�GJ• ` `. 1i r't�/�''x \":\[� '.'f r„r � ♦ 't+ , \ J- -� .r` + ' ' �;a - . ` �. ti yy , It • { ; Y� '' % nom" - � ^i + r1• ,y 6• /,/• Aw ,rte � N • s � �w, .�.�i �• ._ � F\ �i kG % '1`y ��,` � r \ ,r�.J � Y��/�f❑1`'Vt x r *� 5x020�1Google All, ;.� y.``,,., moi',on"e�artl: x Tour Guide 1994 �Y 1 y'� , , 1 pN Imagery Date: 61 9/?019 40"59'3,4r23''tJ 7213 27 elev 21 ft, eve aft S27 ft C SEQRA Negative - Page 13 — July 6, 2015 Figure 2. Current Flagpole Location (circle) The property is zoned Hamlet Business (HB). Zoning Districts located within the vicinity of the parcel include HB to the west, north and south and Residential (R-40) to the east. The dominant surrounding land uses within the vicinity of the site include mixed residential and commercial. The site is currently improved with buildings and a large parking lot with a firehouse, therefore, the proposed action will not result in the significant removal or destruction of large quantities of vegetation. The impact to soils resulting from the construction of the new equipment cabinets would be negligible. The design includes the replacement of an existing 84' communications tower and placement of associated equipment on the roof of the existing structure. Based on the existing use and improved facilities, the proposed action will not cause a substantial intensification of use over the current use. No agricultural soils, open space or recreational resources occur on site, therefore, the proposed action will not cause significant impacts to agricultural, open space or recreational resources. No substantial adverse change in existing air quality, ground or surface water quality or quantity, traffic or noise level will occur as a result of the proposed action. SEQRA Negative - Page 14 — July 6, 2015 The proposed monopole is visible from County Route 48 (CR 48), located to the north of the parcel and New York State Route 25 (SR 25), located to the south of the parcel. Both roadways are New York State Scenic Byways. A One Mile Radius Visibility Study prepared by VHB Consulting Services, dated January 2015, indicates that the proposed action will not result in significant aesthetic impacts over existing conditions due to the mitigation proposed. Therefore, the Planning Board in consideration of the findings of the Visual Analysis, has determined that the action would not result in significant impacts to view sheds from CR 48 or SR 25 or those identified as important to the community. The proposed action is located within an Archeo-sensitive Area (Mapinfo 2015). Due to the improvements on the parcel and the minimal new ground disturbance proposed, the action would not result in adverse impacts to cultural/historic resources nor impair the character or quality of important historical or architectural resources. The site is currently improved (including an existing 84' communications tower to be replaced), and the proposed action will not result in significant adverse impacts to existing community or neighborhood character or result in a material conflict with the community current plans or goals as officially approved. Based upon such, no significant, adverse impacts to the environment are expected to occur should the project be implemented as planned. This determination is based, in part, on the One Mile Radius Visibility Study (January 2015) prepared by VHB; the Real Estate Consulting Report, dated March 9, 2015, prepared by Lynch Appraisal LTD; the RF Exposure Analysis for Proposed Upgrade New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC; AT&T Antenna Facility prepared by Betchel Communications, Inc. For Further Information: Contact Person: Mark Terry, Principal Planner Southold Town Planning Board, 6311765-1938 cc: Town Board Building Dept. Agency Use Only [If applicable] Full Environmental Assessment Form Project: MattituckMattituck Fire District Telecomm Part 2 - Identification of Potential Project Impacts Date : sizans Part 2 is to be completed by the lead agency. Part 2 is designed to help the lead agency inventory all potential resources that could be affected by a proposed project or action. We recognize that the lead agency's reviewer(s) will not necessarily be environmental professionals. So, the questions are designed to walk a reviewer through the assessment process by providing a series of questions that can be answered using the information found in Part 1. To further assist the lead agency in completing Part 2, the form identifies the most relevant questions in Part 1 that will provide the information needed to answer the Part 2 question. When Part 2 is completed, the lead agency will have identified the relevant environmental areas that may be impacted by the proposed activity. If the lead agency is a state agency and the action is in any Coastal Area, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Tips for completing Part 2: • Review all of the information provided in Part 1. • Review any application, maps, supporting materials and the Full EAF Workbook. • Answer each of the 18 questions in Part 2. • If you answer "Yes" to a numbered question, please complete all the questions that follow in that section. • If you answer "No" to a numbered question, move on to the next numbered question. • Check appropriate column to indicate the anticipated size of the impact. • Proposed projects that would exceed a numeric threshold contained in a question should result in the reviewing agency checking the box "Moderate to large impact may occur." • The reviewer is not expected to be an expert in environmental analysis. • If you are not sure or undecided about the size of an impact, it may help to review the sub -questions for the general question and consult the workbook. • When answering a question consider all components of the proposed activity, that is, the "whole action". • Consider the possibility for long-term and cumulative impacts as well as direct impacts. • Answer the ouestion in a reasonable manner considering the scale and context of the project. 1. Impact on Land Proposed action may involve construction on, or physical alteration of, ®NO ❑ YES the land surface of the proposed site. (See Part 1. D.1) I "Yes ", answer questions a - j, I "No ", move on to Section 2. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may involve construction on -land where depth to water table is less than 3 feet. E2d ❑ ❑ b. The proposed action may involve construction on slopes of 15% or greater. Elf ❑ ❑ c. The proposed action may involve construction on land where bedrock is exposed, or E2a ❑ ❑ generally within 5 feet of existing ground surface. d. The proposed action may involve the excavation and removal of more than 1,000 tons D2a ❑ ❑ of natural material. e. The proposed action may involve construction that continues for more than one year Dle ❑ ❑ or in multiple phases. f. The proposed action may result in increased erosion, whether from physical D2e, D2q ❑ ❑ disturbance or vegetation removal (including from treatment by herbicides). g. The proposed action is, or may be, located within a Coastal Erosion hazard area. B 1 i ❑ ❑ h. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Page 1 of 10 2. Impact on Geological Features The proposed action may result in the modification or destruction of, or inhibit access to, any unique or unusual land forms on the site (e.g., cliffs, dunes, ®NO ❑YES minerals, fossils, caves). (See Part 1. E.2.g) I "Yes ", answer questions a - c. I "No ", move on to Section 3. Relevant Relevant No, or Moderate Part I Part I small to large Question(s) Question(s) impact impact may may occur may occur occur a. Identify the specific land form(s) attached: E2g ❑ ❑ D2b b. The proposed action may affect or is adjacent to a geological feature listed as a E3c ❑ ❑ registered National Natural Landmark. c. The proposed action may involve dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material D2a Specific feature: ❑ from a wetland or water body. c. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 3. Impacts on Surface Water The proposed action may affect one or more wetlands or other surface water ®NO ❑YES bodies (e.g., streams, rivers, ponds or lakes). (See Part 1. D.2, E.21) I "Yes ", answer questions a - 1. I "No ", move on to Section 4. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may create a new water body. D2b, Dlh ❑ ❑ b. The proposed action may result in an increase or decrease of over 10% or more than a D2b ❑ ❑ 10 acre increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water. c. The proposed action may involve dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material D2a ❑ ❑ from a wetland or water body. d. The proposed action may involve construction within or adjoining a freshwater or E2h ❑ ❑ tidal wetland, or in the bed or banks of any other water body. e. The proposed action may create turbidity in a waterbody, either from upland erosion, 132a, D2h ❑ ❑ runoff or by. disturbing bottom sediments. f. The proposed action may include construction of one or more intake(s) for withdrawal D2c ❑ ❑ of water from surface water. g. The proposed action may include construction of one or more outfall(s) for discharge of wastewater to surface water(s). D2d ❑ ❑ h. The proposed action may cause soil erosion, or otherwise create a source of D2e ❑ ❑ stormwater discharge that may lead to siltation or other degradation of receiving water bodies. i. The proposed action may affect the water quality of any water bodies within or E2h • ❑ ❑ downstream of the site of the proposed action. j. The proposed action may involve the application of pesticides or herbicides in or D2q, E2h ❑ ❑ around any water body. k. The proposed action may require the construction of new, or expansion of existing, Dl a, D2d ❑ ❑ wastewater treatment facilities. Page 2 of 10 1. Other impacts: ° ° 4. Impact on groundwater The proposed action may result in new or additional use of ground water, or ©NO ❑YES may have the potential to introduce contaminants to ground water or an aquifer. (See Part 1. D.2.a, D.2.c, D.2.d, D.2.p, D.2.q, D.2.t) If "Yes ", answer questions a - h. If "No ", move on to Section S. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may require new water supply wells, or create additional demand D2c ❑ ❑ on supplies from existing water supply wells. E2J ❑ ❑ c. The proposed action may result in development within a 500 year floodplain. E2k ❑ ❑ b. Water supply demand from the proposed action may exceed safe and sustainable D2c Cl ❑ withdrawal capacity rate of the local supply or aquifer. Cite Source: D2b, E2i, ❑ ❑ c. The proposed action may allow or result in residential uses in areas without water and Dla, D2c ❑ ❑ sewer services. E1 e ❑ ❑ d. The proposed action may include or require wastewater discharged to groundwater. D2d, E21 ° ° e. The proposed action may result in the construction of water supply wells in locations D2c, Elf, ❑ ❑ where groundwater is, or is suspected to be, contaminated. Elg, Elh f. The proposed action may require the bulk storage of petroleum or chemical products D2p, E21 ❑ ❑ over ground water or an aquifer. g. The proposed action may involve the commercial application of pesticides within 100 feet of potable drinking water or irrigation sources. E2h, D2q, E21, D2c ❑ ❑ h. Other impacts: ° ° 5. Impact on Flooding The proposed action may result in development on lands subject to flooding. ®NO ❑ YES (See Part 1. E.2) I "Yes ", answer questions a - g. I "No ", move on to Section 6. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may result in development in a designated floodway. E2i ❑ ❑ b. The proposed action may result in development within a 100 year floodplain. E2J ❑ ❑ c. The proposed action may result in development within a 500 year floodplain. E2k ❑ ❑ d. The proposed action may result in, or require, modification of existing drainage D2b, D2e ❑ ❑ patterns. e. The proposed action may change flood water flows that contribute to flooding. D2b, E2i, ❑ ❑ E2', E f. If there is a dam located on the site of the proposed action, is the dam in need of repair, E1 e ❑ ❑ or upgrade? Page 3 of 10 g. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 6. Impacts on Air The proposed action may include a state regulated air emission source. ©NO []YES (See Part 1. D.2.f., D,2,h, D.2.g) If "Yes ", answer questions a -f If "No ", move on to Section 7. No, or Relevant No, or Moderate small Part I small to large impact Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur may occur occur a. If the proposed action requires federal or state air emission permits, the action may ❑ threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the Federal also emit one or more greenhouse gases at or above the following levels: government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. i. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide (CO2) D2g ❑ ❑ ii. More than 3.5 tons/year of nitrous oxide (N20) D2g ❑ ° iii. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon equivalent of perfluorocarbons (PFCs) D2g ° ❑ iv. More than .045 tons/year of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) D2g ❑ ❑ v. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide equivalent of D2g c. The proposed action may cause reduction in population, or loss of individuals, of any E2p hydrochloroflourocarbons (EFCs) emissions ❑ species of special concern or conservation need, as listed by New York State or the vi. 43 tons/year or more of methane D2h ° ° b. The proposed action may generate 10 tons/year or more of any one designated D2g ° ° hazardous air pollutant, or 25 tons/year or more of any combination of such hazardous d. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2p air pollutants. ° any species of special concern and conservation need, as listed by New York State or c. The proposed action may require a state air registration, or may produce an emissions 132f, D2g ❑ ❑ rate of total contaminants that may exceed 5 lbs. per hour, or may include a heat source capable of producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. d. The proposed action may reach 50% of any of the thresholds in "a" through "c", D2g ° ° above. e. The proposed action may result in the combustion or thermal treatment of more than 1 D2s ❑ ❑ ton of refuse per hour. f. Other impacts: 7. Impact on Plants and Animals The proposed action may result in a loss of flora or fauna. (See Part 1. E.2. m. -q.) W]NO [j YES I "Yes ", answer questions a - j. I "No ", move on to Section 8. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may cause reduction in population or loss of individuals of any E2o ❑ ❑ threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. b. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by any rare, threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the federal E2o ❑ ❑ government. c. The proposed action may cause reduction in population, or loss of individuals, of any E2p ❑ ❑ species of special concern or conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. d. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2p ° ° any species of special concern and conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government. Page 4 of 10 e. The proposed action may diminish the capacity of a registered National Natural Landmark to support the biological community it was established to protect. E3c ❑ ❑ f. The proposed action may result in the removal of, or ground disturbance in, any portion of a designated significant natural community. Source: E2n ❑ ❑ small g. The proposed action may substantially interfere with nesting/breeding, foraging, or over -wintering habitat for the predominant species that occupy or use the project site. E2m ❑ ❑ h. The proposed action requires the conversion of more than 10 acres of forest, grassland or any other regionally or locally important habitat. Habitat type & information source: Elb ❑ ❑ i. Proposed action (commercial, industrial or recreational projects, only) involves use of herbicides or pesticides. D2q ❑ ❑ j. Other impacts: NYS Land Classification System. ° ° 8. Impact on Agricultural Resources The proposed action may impact agricultural resources. (See Part 1. E.3.a. and b.) ONO ❑YES I "Yes ", answer questions a - h. I "No ", move on to Section 9. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may impact soil classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the E2c, E3b ❑ ❑ NYS Land Classification System. b. The proposed action may sever, cross or otherwise limit access to agricultural land Ela, Elb ❑ ❑ (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc). c. The proposed action may result in the excavation or compaction of the soil profile of E3b ❑ ❑ active agricultural land. d. The proposed action may irreversibly convert agricultural land to non-agricultural Elb, E3a ❑ ❑ uses, either more than 2.5 acres if located in an Agricultural District, or more than 10 acres if not within an Agricultural District. e. The proposed action may disrupt or prevent installation of an agricultural land El a, Elb ❑ ❑ management system. f. The proposed action may result, directly or indirectly, in increased development potential or pressure on farmland. C2c, C3, D2c, D2d ❑ ❑ g. The proposed project is not consistent with the adopted municipal Farmland C2c ❑ ❑ Protection Plan. h. Other impacts: ° ° Page 5 of 10 9. Impact on Aesthetic Resources The land use of the proposed action are obviously different from, or are in []NO YES sharp contrast to, current land use patterns between the proposed project and a scenic or aesthetic resource. (Part 1. E. La, E. Lb, E.3.h.) I "Yes ", answer questions a - g, I "No", go to Section 10. No, or Relevant No, or Moderate small Part I small to large impact Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur may occur occur a. Proposed action may be visible from any officially designated federal, state, or local E3h ® ❑ scenic or aesthetic resource. nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on the State or b. The proposed action may result in the obstruction, elimination or significant E3h, C2b ® ❑ screening of one or more officially designated scenic views. b. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous E3f c. The proposed action may be visible from publicly accessible vantage points: E3h to, an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic i. Seasonally (e.g., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) ® ❑ ii. Year round ® ❑ d. The situation or activity in which viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed E3h c. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous E3g action is: E2q, to, an archaeological site not included on the NY SHPO inventory. L Routine travel by residents, including travel to and from work ® ❑ ii. Recreational or tourism based activities Elc ® ❑ e. The proposed action may cause a diminishment of the public enjoyment and E3h ® ❑ appreciation of the designated aesthetic resource. f. There are similar projects visible within the following distance of the proposed D la, Ela, ® ❑ project: Dlf, Dlg 0-1/2 mile '/2 -3 mile 3-5 mile 5+ mile g. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 10. Impact on Historic and Archeological Resources The proposed action may occur in or adjacent to a historic or archaeological WINO YES resource. (Part 1. E.3.e, f. and g.) If "Yes", answer questions a - e. If "No", go to Section 11. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous E3e ❑ ❑ to, any buildings, archaeological site or district which is listed on or has been nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on the State or National Register of Historic Places. b. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous E3f ❑ ❑ to, an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory. c. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous E3g ❑ ❑ to, an archaeological site not included on the NY SHPO inventory. Source: Page 6 of 10 d. Other impacts: The proposed action may result in a loss of recreational opportunities or a ❑ ❑ (See Part 1. C.2.c, E.l.c., E.2.q.) e. If any of the above (a -d) are answered "Yes", continue with the following questions Moderate Relevant No, or to help support conclusions in Part 3: to large Part I small i. The proposed action may result in the destruction or alteration of all or part E3e, E3g, ❑ ❑ of the site or property. E3f a. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource or may occur ii. The proposed action may result in the alteration of the property's setting or E3e, EH, ❑ ❑ integrity. E3g, Ela, E2h, E3d ❑ Elb E2m, Ego, iii. The proposed action may result in the introduction of visual elements which E3e, EH, ❑ ❑ are out of character with the site or property, or may alter its setting. E3g, E3h, C2a, Elc, ❑ ❑ C2, C3 C2c, E2 11. Impact on Open Space and Recreation F,/]NO DYES The proposed action may result in a loss of recreational opportunities or a reduction of an open space resource as designated in any adopted municipal open space plan. (See Part 1. C.2.c, E.l.c., E.2.q.) I "Yes ", answer questions a - e. I "No ", go to Section 12. Moderate Relevant No, or Moderate to large Part I small to large impact may Question(s) impact impact may occur a. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource or may occur occur a. The proposed action may result in an impairment of natural functions, or "ecosystem D2e, Elb ❑ ❑ services", provided by an undeveloped area, including but not limited to stormwater E2h, E3d ❑ storage, nutrient cycling, wildlife habitat. E2m, Ego, E2n, E2 ❑ b. The proposed action may result in the loss of a current or future recreational resource. C2a, Elc, ❑ ❑ C2c, E2 c. The proposed action may eliminate open space or recreational resource in an area C2a, C2c Cl ❑ with few such resources. Elc, E2q d. The proposed action may result in loss of an area now used informally by the C2c, Elc ❑ ❑ community as an open space resource. e. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 12. Impact on Critical Environmental Areas The proposed action may be located within or adjacent to a critical ✓0 NO YES environmental area (CEA). (See Part 1. E.3.d) I "Yes", answer questions a - c. I "No ", go to Section 13. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource or EM ❑ ❑ characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. b. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quality of the resource or E3d ❑ ❑ characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. c. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Page 7 of 10 13. Impact on Transportation The proposed action may result in a change to existing transportation systems. ❑✓ NO YES (See Part 1. D.2 j) If "Yes ", answer questions a - g. I "No ", go to Section 14. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. Projected traffic increase may exceed capacity of existing road network. D2j ❑ ❑ b. The proposed action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission Dlf, ❑ ❑ b. The proposed action may result in the construction of'paved parking area for 500 or D2j ❑ ❑ more vehicles. c. The proposed action will degrade existing transit access. D2j ❑ ❑ d. The proposed action will degrade existing pedestrian or bicycle accommodations. D2j ❑ ❑ e. The proposed action may alter the present pattern of movement of people or goods. D2j ❑ ❑ f. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 14. Impact on Energy The proposed action may cause an increase in the use of any form of energy. ©NO [—]YES (See Part 1. 13.21) I "Yes ", answer questions a - e. I "No", go to Section 15. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action will require a new, or an upgrade to an existing, substation. D2k ❑ ❑ b. The proposed action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission Dlf, ❑ ❑ or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two-family residences or to serve a Dlq, D2k ❑ ❑ commercial or industrial use. c. The proposed action may utilize more than 2,500 MWhrs per year of electricity. D2k ❑ ❑ d. The proposed action may involve heating and/or cooling of more than 100,000 square Dlg ❑ ❑ feet of building area when completed. e. Other Impacts: 15. Impact on Noise, Odor, and Light The proposed action may result in an increase in noise, odors, or outdoor lighting. ©NO ❑YES (See Part 1. D.2.m., n., and o.) I "Yes ", answer questions a -f I "No ", go to Section 16. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may produce sound above noise levels established by local D2m ❑ ❑ regulation. b. The proposed action may result in blasting within 1,500 feet of any residence, D2m, Eld ❑ ❑ hospital, school, licensed day care center, or nursing home. c. The proposed action may result in routine odors for more than one hour per day. D2o ❑ ❑ Page 8 of 10 d. The proposed action may result in light shining onto adjoining properties. D2n ❑ ❑ e. The proposed action may result in lighting creating sky -glow brighter than existing area conditions. D2n, E1 a ❑ ❑ f. Other impacts: small ❑ ❑ Question(s) 16. Impact on Human Health The proposed action may have an impact on human health from exposure © NO ❑ YES to new or existing sources of contaminants. (See Part 1.D.2.q., E.1. d. f. g. and h.) I "Yes ", answer questions a - m. I "No ", go to Section 17. Relevant Noor Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may cccur occur a. The proposed action is located within 1500 feet of a school, hospital, licensed day Eld ❑ ❑ care center, group home, nursing home or retirement community. b. The site of the proposed action is currently undergoing remediation. Elg, Elh ❑ ❑ c. There is a completed emergency spill remediation, or a completed environmental site Elg, Elh ❑ ❑ remediation on, or adjacent to, the site of the proposed action. d. The site of the action is subject to an institutional control limiting the use of the Elg, Elh ❑ ❑ property (e.g., easement or deed restriction). e. The proposed action may affect institutional control measures that were put in place Elg, Elh ❑ ❑ to ensure that the site remains protective of the environment and human health. f The proposed action has adequate control measures in place to ensure that future D2t ❑ ❑ generation, treatment and/or disposal of hazardous wastes will be protective of the environment and human health. g. The proposed action involves construction or modification of a solid waste D2q, Elf ❑ ❑ management facility. h. The proposed action may result in the unearthing of solid or hazardous waste. D2q, Elf ❑ ❑ i. The proposed action may result in an increase in the rate of disposal, or processing, of D2r, D2s ❑ ❑ solid waste. j. The proposed action may result in excavation or other disturbance within 2000 feet of Elf, Elg ❑ ❑ a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Elh k. The proposed action may result in the migration of explosive gases from a landfill Elf, Elg ❑ ❑ site to adjacent off site structures. 1. The proposed action may result in the release of contaminated leachate from the project site. 132s, Elf, D2r ❑ ❑ in. Other impacts: Page 9 of 10 17. Consistency with Community Plans The proposed action is not consistent with adopted land use plans. F,/] NO FIYES (See Part 1. C.1, C.2. and C.3.) If "Yes ", answer questions a - h. If "No ", go to Section 18. I "Yes ", answer questions a - g, I "No ", proceed to Part 3. Relevant No, or Moderate Moderate Part I small to large to large Question(s) impact impact may impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action's land use components may be different from, or in sharp C2, C3, Dla ❑ ❑ contrast to, current surrounding land use pattern(s). Ela, Elb b. The proposed action will cause the permanent population of the city, town or village C2 ❑ ❑ in which the project is located to grow by more than 5%. schools, police and fire) c. The proposed action is inconsistent with local land use plans or zoning regulations. C2, C2, 0 ❑ ❑ d. The proposed action is inconsistent with any County plans, or other regional land use C2, C2 ❑ ❑ plans. d. The proposed action may interfere with the use or enjoyment of officially recognized C2, E3 ® ❑ or designated public resources. e. The proposed action may cause a change in the density of development that is not supported by existing infrastructure or is distant from existing infrastructure. C3, Dlc, Dld, Dlf, Dld, Elb ❑ ❑ f. The proposed action is located in an area characterized by low density development that will require new or expanded public infrastructure. . C4, D2 c, D2d D2j ° ° g. The proposed action may induce secondary development impacts (e.g., residential or C2a ❑ ❑ commercial development not included in the proposed action) Ela, Elb h. Other: ° ° g. Other impacts: 18. Consistency with Community Character The proposed project is inconsistent with the existing community character. []NO AYES (See Part 1. C.2, C.3, D.2, E.3) I "Yes ", answer questions a - g, I "No ", proceed to Part 3. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures, or areas E3e, E3f, E3g ® ❑ of historic importance to the community. b. The proposed action may create a demand for additional community services (e.g. C4 ® ❑ schools, police and fire) c. The proposed action may displace affordable or low-income housing in an area where C2, C3, Dlf ® ❑ there is a shortage of such housing. Dlg, Ela d. The proposed action may interfere with the use or enjoyment of officially recognized C2, E3 ® ❑ or designated public resources. e. The proposed action is inconsistent with the predominant architectural scale and C2, C3 ® ❑ character. f. Proposed action is inconsistent with the character of the existing natural landscape. C2, C3 ® ❑ Ela, Elb E2g, E2h g. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ PRINT FULL FORM Page 10 of 10 Use O Project : IMattituck Fire District Telecommunications Date: F�,,,, Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 - Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance of Project Impacts and Determination of Significance Part 3 provides the reasons in support of the determination of significance. The lead agency must complete Part 3 for every question in Part 2 where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not, or may, result in a significant adverse environmental impact. Based on the analysis in Part 3, the lead agency must decide whether to require an environmental impact statement to further assess the proposed action or whether available information is sufficient for the lead agency to conclude that the proposed action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact. By completing the certification on the next page, the lead agency can complete its determination of significance. Reasons Supporting This Determination: To complete this section: • Identify the impact based on the Part 2 responses and describe its magnitude. Magnitude considers factors such as severity, size or extent of an impact. • Assess the importance of the impact. Importance relates to the geographic scope, duration, probability of the impact occurring, number of people affected by the impact and any additional environmental consequences if the impact were to occur. • The assessment should take into consideration any design element or project changes. • Repeat this process for each Part 2 question where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not, or may, result in a significant adverse ' environmental impact. • Provide the reason(s) why the impact may, or will not, result in a significant adverse environmental impact • For Conditional Negative Declarations identify the specific condition(s) imposed that will modify the proposed action so that no significant adverse environmental impacts will result. • Attach additional sheets, as needed. See Attached State Environmental Quality Review Negative Declaration Notice of Determination Non -Significance June 24, 2015 Determination of Significance - Type 1 and Unlisted Actions SEQR Status: ❑ Type I ❑✓ Unlisted Identify portions of EAF completed for this Project: ❑✓ Part 1 ❑✓ Part 2 ❑✓ Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF, as noted, plus this additional support information One Mile Radius Visibility Study (January 2015) prepared by VHB• the Cityscape (Town Consultant) correspondence dated April 3 2015 SCINETX Evaluation of Radio Frequency Emissions.., dated September 4, 2014; Proposed Communications Facility Upgrade Mattituck Fire District (May 2015) prepared by VHB and the Real Estate-Consulting Report, prepared by Elite Towers, LP June 2015). and considering both the magnitude and importance of each identified potential impact, it is the conclusion of the Southold Planning Board as lead agency that: ❑✓ A. This project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment; and, therefore, an environmental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued. ❑ B. Although this project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, that impact will be avoided or substantially mitigated because of the following conditions which will be required by the lead agency: There will, therefore, be no significant adverse impacts from the project as conditioned, and, therefore, this conditioned negative declaration is issued. A conditioned negative declaration may be used only for UNLISTED actions (see 6 NYCRR 617A). ❑ C. This Project may result in one or more significant adverse impacts on the environment, and an environmental impact statement must be prepared to further assess the impact(s) and possible mitigation and to explore alternatives to avoid or reduce those impacts. Accordingly, this positive declaration is issued. Name of Action: Mattituck Fire District Telecommunications Facility Name of Lead Agency: Southold Planning Board Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Donald Wilcenski Title of Responsible Officer: Chair . rr Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: =1'J. Date: Date: - Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officerr7::22::� 1 For Further Information: Contact Person: Mark Terry, Principal Planner Address: 54375 State Route 25, P.O. Box 1179, Southold, NY 11971 Telephone Number: 631-765-1938 E-mail: Mark.Terry@town.southold.ny.us For Type 1 Actions and Conditioned Negative Declarations, a copy of this Notice is sent to: Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be principally located (e.g., Town / City / Village of) Other involved agencies (if any) Applicant (if any) Environmental Notice Bulletin: http: `/-,vww.dcc.ny.pov; enb/enb.litinl PRINT FULL FORM Page 2 of 2 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR July 7, 2015 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 �pF SOUryo ycOU01 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov Re: SEQRA Determination — Proposed Site Plan for Berry & Berry 41535 NYS Rt. 25, ±500's/w/o Rt. 25 & Peconic Lane, Peconic SCTM#1000-75-5-13 Zoning District: B - General Business Dear Ms. Moore: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolution ata meeting held on Monday, July 6, 2015: WHEREAS, this proposed Site Plan Application is to convert an existing 1,096 sq. ft. dwelling to a business office and construct a 64'x 40' (2,560 sq. ft.) four bay storage garage pursuant to ZBA File #6818 on 20,419 sq. ft. (0.47 acres) in the General Business (B) Zoning District, Peconic; and WHEREAS, the applicant submitted a revised application for Site Plan review on March 19, 2015; and WHEREAS, on April 10, 2015, the Planning Board accepted the application for review; and WHEREAS, on May 4, 2015, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) 6 NYCRR, Part 617, determined that the proposed action is an Unlisted Action as it does not meet any of the thresholds of a Type I Action, nor does it meet any of the criteria on the Type II list of actions; and WHEREAS, on May 4, 2015, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act §617.6, established itself as lead agency for this Unlisted Action; and Berry & Berry Pae 12 July 7, 2015 WHEREAS, on May 11, 2015, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to §617.6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiated the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this Unlisted Action; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, as Lead Agency pursuant to SEQRA, hereby makes a determination of non -significance for the proposed action and grants a Negative Declaration. A copy of the Negative Declaration is enclosed for your records. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman Encls. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoliltownny.gov State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non -Significance July 6, 2015 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described .below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Berry & Berry LLC SCTM#: 1000-75.-5-13 ` Location: ±495' s/w/o Peconic Lane & NYS Route 25, Peconic SEAR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: This proposed Site Plan Application is to convert an existing 1096 s.f. dwelling to a business office and construct a 64' x 40' (2,560 sq. ft.) four bay storage garage pursuant to ZBA File #6818 on 20,419 sq. ft. (0.47 acres) in the General Business (B) Zoning District, Peconic. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed. The determination was based upon the following: SEQRA Negative Declaration - Page 12 — July 6, 2015 Imoact On Land The 6/6/14 test hole indicates that water is -13.7 feet below grade. The depth to groundwater is sufficient to meet the 3' separation distance required for sanitary systems per Suffolk County Department of Health standards. No substantial impact to groundwater is expected to occur if the project is implemented as planned. The proposed action is not expected to result in a significant adverse impact on land. Imnact of Water 1. Water Supply Public water is currently supplied to the existing 1096 s.f. dwelling building via a 2" water service line. No significant impacts to public water supply are expected. 2. Sanitary Disposal In 1978, the Long Island Regional Planning Board published the Long Island Comprehensive Waste Treatment Management Plan (208 Study). The 208 Study identified eight (8) Hydrogeologic Zones in Nassau and Suffolk Counties. These zones were distinguished based upon differences in underlying groundwater flow patterns and water quality. The subject site is located within SCDHS Groundwater Management Zone IV, which according to Article VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code, has an allowable flow of 600 gallons per day (gpd) per acre in areas served by public water. The allowable Nitrogen bearing flow for the overall .471 acre site is 282.6 gpd. The combined uses (office area, dry storage) are calculated to use 272.04 gpd, therefore, the proposed uses meet the maximum allowable flow permitted. The proposed application would conform to Article VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code and would not be expected to adversely affect groundwater quality provided properly functioning systems are designed and installed. 3. Ground or Surface Water Quality or Quantity Six drainage structures (drywells) to capture and retain stormwater run-off are proposed for the existing and proposed building additions. The proposed drainage is adequate to capture run-off from a 2" rainfall and therefore, potential impacts from stormwater run-off are expected to be low. No surface water is located within the'vicinity of the site. Recognizing the significant impact that Nitrogen has on our groundwater and surface waters, Suffolk County has developed and is implementing a plan to reduce the impacts of fertilizer on ground and surface water. The Suffolk County Legislature established a goal of reducing fertilization in residential areas by 10 to 25 percent, regardless of lot size and landscaped area, and passed Local Law 41-2007 in 2007 to reduce Nitrogen pollution by reducing the use of fertilizer throughout the County (SCDHS). SEQRA Negative Declaration - Page 13 — July 6, 2015 The Planning Board is requiring the following Best Management Practices: a. Require the use of native, drought -tolerant plants in landscaping. b. Require only the use of organic fertilizers where the water-soluble nitrogen is no more than 20% of the total Nitrogen in the mixture. c. Require a maximum of 1 Ib. of Nitrogen per 1000 square feet in any one application, with a cumulative application of no more than 2 lbs. per 1,000 square feet per year. d. Prohibit the application of fertilizer products containing Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium between November 1 st and April 1 st. e. Prohibit the use of Phosphorous containing lawn fertilizer unless establishing a new lawn or soil test shows that the lawn does not have enough Phosphorus. Fertilizer labels have three bold numbers. The number in the middle is the percentage of Phosphorus in the product, e.g. 22-0-15. Use of products with 0.67 in the middle or lower is not restricted. Products with a number higher than 0.67 may only be used if a new lawn is being established or a soil test indicates it is necessary. 4. Flooding The proposed improvements are located within an unmapped flood zone, therefore, the potential impacts from threat of flooding is very low. Impact on Air No substantial adverse change in existing air quality is expected to occur. Impact on Plants and Animals The parcel is not located within a New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Critical Environmental Area or a New York State Department of State Significant Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area. The parcel is improved with existing buildings and operates as a commercial business. The majority of the site is cleared and little vegetation remains on site; the proposed location of the new building has also been cleared of vegetation. Due to site development, the presence of animals is low, therefore, the potential occurrence of rare or threatened plants or animals on site or within the vicinity of the site is low. No significant removal or destruction of large quantities of vegetation will occur. Correspondingly, no substantial interference with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species nor impacts on a significant habitat area will occur. Impact on Agricultural Land Resources The parcel is not currently in agricultural production, therefore, no adverse impacts to agricultural lands will occur. SEQRA Negative Declaration - Page 14 — July 6, 2015 Imoact on Aesthetic Resources The parcel is located north of State Route 25, a New York Scenic Byway and is visible from the roadway. The proposed use will improve the parcel with landscaping and boundary delineation, adding aesthetic value to the property. Fifty-four (54) Thuja Green Giant @ 4'-5' tall and 5' on center, one (1) Zelkova @ 2.5"-3" caliper and other assorted plants will be installed. Existing large trees will be preserved on-site. The 64'x 40' (2,560 sq. ft.) four bay storage garage is proposed to be located north of the existing building on-site. No substantial adverse impacts to aesthetic resources are expected to occur. Impact on Historical and Archeological Resources The parcel is included within the Archeo-sensitive Area (MAPINFO GIS - Archeo-sensitive Layer), however, due to past site disturbance and commercial use, the proposed actions are not expected to impact important historical or archaeological resources. Impact on Open Space and Recreation No significant impacts to public open space or recreational areas will occur as a result of this action. Impact on Critical Areas The proposed action is not located within a New York Department of Environmental Conservation Critical Environmental Area. Impact on Transportation The current use is commercial. The proposed use includes dry storage in a new a 64'x 40' (2,560 sq. ft.) four bay storage garage and conversion of an existing 1096 s.f. dwelling to a commercial use. No significant traffic volume (generation) or flow will occur. Impact of Energy No major change in the use of either the quantity or type of energy will occur. Noise and Odor Impact No substantial change in noise or odor is expected to occur. Impact on Public Health No creation of a hazard to human health is expected to occur. No substantial increase in solid waste production, leaching or drainage problems is expected to occur if the proposed action is implemented as planned. SEQRA Negative Declaration - Page 15 — July 6, 2015 In a May 27, 2015 letter, the Southold Fire District has determined that fire protection is adequate. Impact on Growth, Character of Community or Neighborhood Proposed lighting will meet Dark Sky Standards, be contained on-site and not trespass onto adjacent parcels. Town Code requires that all security site lighting be accomplished with floodlights on the building which will be wired to motion sensors. These lights will remain on for a maximum of 10 minutes after they have been actuated. No lights will remain on with the exception of sign lighting. Canopy and soffit lighting will be a maximum of 100 watt LED recessed fixtures. Fixtures are to be mounted inside the underside of the soffits (white). These lights will provide a downward wash of the building during hours of operation and will be on a timer. The action has been recommended as consistent (with Best Management Practices) with the policies of the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. The proposed action is not in significant material conflict with a community's current plans or goals as officially approved or adopted. On February 19, 2015, the Southold Town Board of Appeals granted a Variance as applied for in the amended application, and shown on the Site Plan SP -1 drawn by James Deerkoski, PE., dated Sept. 28, 2014, latest revision dated Jan. 9, 2015 with the following CONDITIONS: 1. The converted dwelling to a contractor's business shall remain a single business use only. 2. Applicant shall obtain Site Plan approval from the Planning Board. Based upon such, no significant adverse impacts to the environment are expected to occur should the project be implemented as planned. For Further Information: Contact Person: Mark Terry, Principal Planner Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (631) 765-1938 cc: Southold Town Clerk for Town Board Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Building Department Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 2 - Identification of Potential Project Impacts Agency Use Only [If applicable) Project : Berry & Berry LLC Date : 6/24/15 Part 2 is to be completed by the lead agency. Part 2 is designed to help the lead agency inventory all potential resources that could be affected by a proposed project or action. We recognize that the lead agency's reviewer(s) will not necessarily be environmental professionals. So, the questions are designed to walk a reviewer through the assessment process by providing a series of questions that can be answered using the information found in Part 1. To further assist the lead agency in completing Part 2, the form identifies the most relevant questions in Part 1 that will provide the information needed to answer the Part 2 question. When Part 2 is completed, the lead agency will have identified the relevant environmental areas that may be impacted by the proposed activity. If the lead agency is a state agency and the action is in any Coastal Area, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Tips for completing Part 2: • Review all of the information provided in Part 1. • Review any application, maps, supporting materials and the Full EAF Workbook. • Answer each of the 18 questions in Part 2. • If you answer "Yes" to a numbered question, please complete all the questions that follow in that section. • If you answer "No" to a numbered question, move on to the next numbered question. • Check appropriate column to indicate the anticipated size of the impact. • Proposed projects that would exceed a numeric threshold contained in a question should result in the reviewing agency checking the box "Moderate to large impact may occur." • The reviewer is not expected to be an expert in environmental analysis. • If you are not sure or undecided about the size of an impact, it may help to review the sub -questions for the general question and consult the workbook. • When answering a question consider all components of the proposed activity, that is, the "whole action". • Consider the possibility for long-term and cumulative impacts as well as direct impacts. • Amwer the nue-tion in a reasonable manner considering the scale and context of the project. 1. Impact on Land Proposed action may involve construction on, or physical alteration of, ❑NO OYES the land surface of the proposed site. (See Part 1. D.1) I "Yes", answer questions a - '. I "No ", move on to Section 2. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may involve construction on land where depth to water table is E2d ® ❑ less than 3 feet. b. The proposed action may involve construction on slopes of 15% or greater. E2f ® ❑ c. The proposed action may involve construction on land where bedrock is exposed, or E2a ® ❑ generally within 5 feet of existing ground surface. d. The proposed action may involve the excavation and removal of more than 1,000 tons D2a ® ❑ of natural material. e. The proposed action may involve construction that continues for more than one year D 1 e ® ❑ or in multiple phases. f. The proposed action may result in increased erosion, whether from physical D2e, D2q ® ❑ disturbance or vegetation removal (including from treatment by herbicides). g. The proposed action is, or may be, located within a Coastal Erosion hazard area. Bli ® ❑ h. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Page 1 of 10 2. Impact on Geological Features The proposed action may result in the modification or destruction of, or inhibit access to, any unique or unusual land forms on the site (e.g., cliffs, dunes, ®NO EJ YES minerals, fossils, caves). (See Part 1. E.2.g) I "Yes ", answer questions a - c. I "No ", move on to Section 3. Relevant Relevant No, or Moderate Part I Part I small to large Question(s) Question(s) impact impact may may occur may occur occur a. Identify the specific land form(s) attached: E2g ❑ ❑ D2b b. The proposed action may affect or is adjacent to a geological feature listed as a E3 ❑ ❑ registered National Natural Landmark. c. The proposed action may involve dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material D2a Specific feature: ❑ from a wetland or water body. c. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 3. Impacts on Surface Water The proposed action may affect one or more wetlands or other surface water ®NO ❑ YES bodies (e.g., streams, rivers, ponds or lakes). (See Part 1. D.2, E.2.h) I "Yes ", answer questions a - 1. I "No ", move on to Section 4. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may create a new water body. D2b, D1h ❑ ❑ b. The proposed action may result in an increase or decrease of over 10% or more than a D2b ❑ ❑ 10 acre increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water. c. The proposed action may involve dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material D2a ❑ ❑ from a wetland or water body. d. The proposed action may involve construction within or adjoining a freshwater or E2h ❑ ❑ tidal wetland, or in the bed or banks of any other water body. e. The proposed action may create turbidity in a waterbody, either from upland erosion, D2a, D2h ❑ ❑ runoff or by disturbing bottom sediments. f. The proposed action may include construction of one or more intake(s) for withdrawal D2c ❑ ❑ of water from surface water. g. The proposed action may include construction of one or more outfall(s) for discharge D2d ❑ ❑ of wastewater to surface water(s). h. The proposed action may cause soil erosion, or otherwise create a source of D2e ❑ ❑ stormwater discharge that may lead to siltation or other degradation of receiving water bodies. i. The proposed action may affect the water quality of any water bodies within or E2h ❑ ❑ downstream of the site of the proposed action. j. The proposed action may involve the application of pesticides or herbicides in or D2q, E2h ❑ ❑ around any water body. k. The proposed action may require the construction of new, or expansion of existing, Dla, D2d ❑ ❑ wastewater treatment facilities. Page 2 of 10 1. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 4. Impact on groundwater The proposed action may result in new or additional use of ground water, or ❑NO ©YES may have the potential to introduce contaminants to ground water or an aquifer. (See Part 1. D.2.a, D.2.c, D.2.d, D.2.p, D.2.q, D.2.t) If "Yes ", answer questions a - h. If "No ", move on to Section S. Relevant Relevant No, or Moderate Part I Part I small to large Question(s) Question(s) impact impact may may occur may occur occur a. The proposed action may require new water supply wells, or create additional demand D2c ® ❑ on supplies from existing water supply wells. ❑ ❑ c. The proposed action may result in development within a 500 year floodplain. E2k ❑ ❑ d. The proposed action may result in, or require, modification of existing drainage b. Water supply demand from the proposed action may exceed safe and sustainable D2c ® ❑ withdrawal capacity rate of the local supply or aquifer. e. The proposed action may change flood water flows that contribute to flooding. Cite Source: Suffolk County Water Authority ❑ ❑ c. The proposed action may allow or result in residential uses in areas without water and Dla, D2c ® ❑ sewer services. ❑ ❑ or upgrade? d. The proposed action may include or require wastewater discharged to groundwater. D2d, E21 ® ❑ e. The proposed action may result in the construction of water supply wells in locations D2c, Elf, ® ❑ where groundwater is, or is suspected to be, contaminated. Elg, Elh f. The proposed action may require the bulk storage of petroleum or chemical products D2p, E21 ® ❑ over ground water or an aquifer. g. The proposed action may involve the commercial application of pesticides within 100 E2h, D2q, ® ❑ feet of potable drinking water or irrigation sources. E21, D2c h. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 5. Impact on Flooding The proposed action may result in development on lands subject to flooding. ®NO ❑ YES (See Part 1. E.2) I "Yes ", answer questions a - g. I "No ", move on to Section 6. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may result in development in a designated floodway. E2i ❑ ❑ b. The proposed action may result in development within a 100 year floodplain. E2.1 ❑ ❑ c. The proposed action may result in development within a 500 year floodplain. E2k ❑ ❑ d. The proposed action may result in, or require, modification of existing drainage D2b, D2e ❑ ❑ patterns. e. The proposed action may change flood water flows that contribute to flooding. D2b, E2i, ❑ ❑ E2', E2k f. If there is a dam located on the site of the proposed action, is the dam in need of repair, Ele ❑ ❑ or upgrade? Page 3 of 10 g. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 6. Impacts on Air The proposed action may include a state regulated air emission source. ©NO DYES (See Part 1. D.2.f., D,2,h, D.2.g) If "Yes ", answer questions a -f If "No ", move on to Section 7. No, or Relevant No, or Moderate small Part I small to large impact Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur may occur occur a. If the proposed action requires federal or state air emission permits, the action may ❑ threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the Federal also emit one or more greenhouse gases at or above the following levels: government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. i. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide (CO2) D2g ❑ ❑ ii. More than 3.5 tons/year of nitrous oxide (N20) D2g ❑ ° iii. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon equivalent of perfluorocarbons (PFCs) D2g ❑ ° ° iv. More than .045 tons/year of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) D2g ❑ ° ❑ v. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide equivalent of D2g hydrochloroflourocarbons (BFCs) emissions c. The proposed action may cause reduction in population, or loss of individuals, of any E2p vi. 43 tons/year or more of methane 132h° species of special concern or conservation need, as listed by New York State or the 11 b. The proposed action may generate 10 tons/year or more of any one designated D2g ❑ ❑ hazardous air pollutant, or 25 tons/year or more of any combination of such hazardous air pollutants. d. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2p c. The proposed action may require a state air registration, or may produce an emissions D2f, D2g ❑ ❑ rate of total contaminants that may exceed 5 lbs. per hour, or may include a heat the Federal government. source capable of producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. d. The proposed action may reach 50% of any of the thresholds in "a" through "c", D2g ❑ ❑ above. e. The proposed action may result in the combustion or thermal treatment of more than 1 132s ❑ ❑ ton of refuse per hour. f. Other impacts: ° ° 7. Impact on Plants and Animals The proposed action may result in a loss of flora or fauna. (See Part 1. E.2. m. -q.) NO ZYES I "Yes ", answer questions a - '. I "No ", move on to Section 8. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may cause reduction in population or loss of individuals of any Ego ® ❑ threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. b. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by Ego ® ❑ any rare, threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the federal government. c. The proposed action may cause reduction in population, or loss of individuals, of any E2p ® ❑ species of special concern or conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. d. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by E2p ® ❑ any species of special concern and conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government. Page 4 of 10 e. The proposed action may diminish the capacity of a registered National Natural Landmark to support the biological community it was established to protect. E3 ® ❑ f. The proposed action may result in the removal of, or ground disturbance in, any portion of a designated significant natural community. Source: E2n ® ❑ small g. The proposed action may substantially interfere with nesting/breeding, foraging, or over -wintering habitat for the predominant species that occupy or use the project site. Elm ® ❑ h. The proposed action requires the conversion of more than 10 acres of forest, grassland or any other regionally or locally important habitat. Habitat type & information source: Elb ® ❑ i. Proposed action (commercial, industrial or recreational projects, only) involves use of herbicides or pesticides. D29 ® ❑ j. Other impacts: NYS Land Classification System. ❑ ❑ 8. Impact on Agricultural Resources The proposed action may impact agricultural resources. (See Part 1. E.3.a. and b.) WINO [—]YES I "Yes ", answer questions a - h. I "No ", move on to Section 9. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may impact soil classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the E2c, E3b ❑ ❑ NYS Land Classification System. b. The proposed action may sever, cross or otherwise limit access to agricultural land Ela, Elb ❑ ❑ (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc). c. The proposed action may result in the excavation or compaction of the soil profile of E3b ❑ ❑ active agricultural land. d. The proposed action may irreversibly convert agricultural land to non-agricultural Elb, E3a ❑ ❑ uses, either more than 2.5 acres if located in an Agricultural District, or more than 10 acres if not within an Agricultural District. e. The proposed action may disrupt or prevent installation of an agricultural land El a, Elb ❑ ❑ management system. f. The proposed action may result, directly or indirectly, in increased development potential or pressure on farmland. C2c, C3, D2c, D2d ❑ ❑ g. The proposed project is not consistent with the adopted municipal Farmland C2c ❑ ❑ Protection Plan. h. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Page 5 of 10 9. Impact on Aesthetic Resources The land use of the proposed action are obviously different from, or are in ONO W]YES sharp contrast to, current land use patterns between the proposed project and a scenic or aesthetic resource. (Part 1. E. La, E. Lb, E.3.h.) If "Yes ", answer questions a - g I "No ", go to Section 10. No, or Relevant No, or Moderate small Part I small to large impact Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur may occur occur a. Proposed action may be visible from any officially designated federal, state, or local E3h ® ❑ scenic or aesthetic resource. nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on the State or b. The proposed action may result in the obstruction, elimination or significant E3h, C2b ® ❑ screening of one or more officially designated scenic views. c. The proposed action may be visible from publicly accessible vantage points: E3h b. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous E3f L Seasonally (e.g., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) ❑ ® ❑ ii. Year round ® ❑ d. The situation or activity in which viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed E3h c. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous E3g action is: E2q, to, an archaeological site not included on the NY SHPO inventory. L Routine travel by residents, including travel to and from work ® ❑ ii. Recreational or tourism based activities Elc ® ❑ e. The proposed action may cause a diminishment of the public enjoyment and E3h ® ❑ appreciation of the designated aesthetic resource. f. There are similar projects visible within the following distance of the proposed Dla, Ela, ® ❑ project: Dlf, Dlg 0-1/2 mile '/z -3 mile 3-5 mile 5+ mile g. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 10. Impact on Historic and Archeological Resources The proposed action may occur in or adjacent to a historic or archaeological ONO YES resource. (Part 1. E.3.e, f. and g.) If "Yes ", answer questions a - e. If "No ", go to Section 11. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous De ❑ ❑ to, any buildings, archaeological site or district which is listed on or has been nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on the State or National Register of Historic Places. b. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous E3f ❑ ❑ to, an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory. c. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous E3g ❑ ❑ to, an archaeological site not included on the NY SHPO inventory. Source: Page 6 of 10 d. Other impacts: The proposed action may result in a loss of recreational opportunities or a F,/]NO YES ❑ ❑ (See Part 1. C.2.c, E.l.c., E.2.q.) e. If any of the above (a -d) are answered "Yes", continue with the following questions Moderate Relevant No, or to help support conclusions in Part 3: to large Part I small L The proposed action may result in the destruction or alteration of all or part De, E3g, ❑ ❑ of the site or property. E3f a. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource or may occur ii. The proposed action may result in the alteration of the property's setting or De, E3f, ° ° integrity. E3g, Ela, E2h, E3d ❑ Elb E2m, E2o, iii. The proposed action may result in the introduction of visual elements which E3e, E3f, ❑ ❑ are out of character with the site or property, or may alter its setting. E3g, E3h, C2a, Ele, ❑ ❑ C2, 0 C2c, E2 11. Impact on Open Space and Recreation The proposed action may result in a loss of recreational opportunities or a F,/]NO YES reduction of an open space resource as designated in any adopted municipal open space plan. (See Part 1. C.2.c, E.l.c., E.2.q.) I "Yes ", answer questions a - e. I "No", go to Section 12. Moderate Relevant No, or Moderate to large Part I small to large impact may Question(s) impact impact may occur a. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource or may occur occur a. The proposed action may result in an impairment of natural functions, or "ecosystem D2e, E1b ❑ ❑ services", provided by an undeveloped area, including but not limited to stormwater E2h, E3d ❑ storage, nutrient cycling, wildlife habitat. E2m, E2o, E2n, E2 ❑ b. The proposed action may result in the loss of a current or future recreational resource. C2a, Ele, ❑ ❑ C2c, E2 c. The proposed action may eliminate open space or recreational resource in an area C2a, C2c ❑ ❑ with few such resources. Elc, E2q d. The proposed action may result in loss of an area now used informally by the C2c, Elc ❑ ❑ community as an open space resource. e. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 12. Impact on Critical Environmental Areas The proposed action may be located within or adjacent to a critical NO YES environmental area (CEA). (See Part 1. E.3.d) I "Yes ", answer questions a - c. I `No ", o to Section 13. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource or EM ❑ ❑ characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. b. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quality of the resource or E3d ❑ ❑ characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. c. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Page 7 of 10 13. Impact on Transportation The proposed action may result in a change to existing transportation systems. ❑NO YES (See Part 1. D.2 j) I "Yes ", answer questions a - g. 1 "No ", go to Section 14. I "Yes ", answer questions a -f I "No ", go to Section 16. Relevant No, or Moderate Moderate Part I small to large to large Question(s) impact impact may impact may may occur occur a. Projected traffic increase may exceed capacity of existing road network. D2j ® ❑ b. The proposed action may result in the construction of paved parking area for 500 or D2j ® ❑ more vehicles. D 1 q, D2k D2m, E1 d ® c. The proposed action will degrade existing transit access. D2j ® ❑ d. The proposed action will degrade existing pedestrian or bicycle accommodations. D2j ® ❑ e. The proposed action may alter the present pattern of movement of people or goods. D2j ® ❑ f. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ e. Other Impacts: 14. Impact on Energy The proposed action may cause an increase in the use of any form of energy. NO ©YES (See Part 1. D.21) I "Yes ", answer questions a - e. I `No ", go to Section 15. I "Yes ", answer questions a -f I "No ", go to Section 16. Relevant No, or Moderate Moderate Part I small to large to large Question(s) impact impact may impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action will require a new, or an upgrade to an existing, substation. D2k ® ❑ b. The proposed action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission DIf, ® ❑ or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two-family residences or to serve a D 1 q, D2k D2m, E1 d ® commercial or industrial use. hospital, school, licensed day care center, or nursing home. c. The proposed action may utilize more than 2,500 MWhrs per year of electricity. D2k ® ❑ d. The proposed action may involve heating and/or cooling of more than 100,000 square D1g ® ❑ feet of building area when completed. e. Other Impacts: ❑ ❑ 15. Impact on Noise, Odor, and Light The proposed action may result in an increase in noise, odors, or outdoor lighting. [:]NO ©YES (See Part 1. D.2.m., n., and o.) I "Yes ", answer questions a -f I "No ", go to Section 16. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may produce sound above noise levels established by local D2m ® ❑ regulation. b. The proposed action may result in blasting within 1,500 feet of any residence, D2m, E1 d ® ❑ hospital, school, licensed day care center, or nursing home. c. The proposed action may result in routine odors for more than one hour per day. D2o ® ❑ Page 8 of 10 d. The proposed action may result in light shining onto adjoining properties. D2n ® ❑ e. The proposed action may result in lighting creating sky -glow brighter than existing area conditions. D2n, Ela ® ❑ f. Other impacts: small ❑ ❑ Question(s) 16. Impact on Human Health The proposed action may have an impact on human health from exposure © NO ❑ YES to new or existing sources of contaminants. (See Part 1.D.2.q., E.1. d. f. g. and h.) I "Yes", answer questions a - m. I "No ", go to Section 17. Relevant No,or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may cccur occur a. The proposed action is located within 1500 feet of a school, hospital, licensed day Eld ❑ ❑ care center, group home, nursing home or retirement community. b. The site of the proposed action is currently undergoing remediation. Elg, Elh ❑ ❑ c. There is a completed emergency spill remediation, or a completed environmental site Elg, Elh ❑ ❑ remediation on, or adjacent to, the site of the proposed action. d. The site of the action is subject to an institutional control limiting the use of the Elg, Elh ❑ ❑ property (e.g., easement or deed restriction). e. The proposed action may affect institutional control measures that were put in place Elg, Elh ❑ ❑ to ensure that the site remains protective of the environment and human health. f. The proposed action has adequate control measures in place to ensure that future D2t ❑ ❑ generation, treatment and/or disposal of hazardous wastes will be protective of the environment and human health. g. The proposed action involves construction or modification of a solid waste D2q, Elf ❑ ❑ management facility. h. The proposed action may result in the unearthing of solid or hazardous waste. D2q, Elf ❑ ❑ L The proposed action may result in an increase in the rate of disposal, or processing, of D2r, D2s ❑ ❑ solid waste. j. The proposed action may result in excavation or other disturbance within 2000 feet of Elf, Elg ❑ ❑ a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Elh k. The proposed action may result in the migration of explosive gases from a landfill Elf, Elg ❑ ❑ site to adjacent off site structures. 1. The proposed action may result in the release of contaminated leachate from the D2s, Elf, ❑ ❑ project site. D2r in. Other impacts: Page 9 of 10 17. Consistency with Community Plans [:]NO YES The proposed action is not consistent with adopted land use plans. (See Part 1. C.1, C.2. and C.3.) If "Yes ", answer questions a - h. If "No", go to Section 18. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action's land use components may be different from, or in sharp . C2, C3, Dla ® ❑ contrast to, current surrounding land use pattern(s). Ela, Elb b. The proposed action will cause the permanent population of the city, town or village C2 ® ❑ in which the project is located to grow by more than 5%. c. The proposed action is inconsistent with local land use plans or zoning regulations. C2, C2, C3 ® ❑ d. The proposed action is inconsistent with any County plans, or other regional land use C2, C2 ® ❑ plans. C2, E3 ® ❑ e. The proposed action may cause a change in the density of development that is not C3, D1c, ® ❑ supported by existing infrastructure or is distant from existing infrastructure. DId, Dlf, ® ❑ character. Dld, Elb f. The proposed action is located in an area characterized by low density development C4, D2c, D2d ® ❑ that will require new or expanded public infrastructure. D2j , g. The proposed action may induce secondary development impacts (e.g., residential or C2a ® ❑ commercial development not included in the proposed action) ❑ ❑ h. Other: ❑ ❑ 18. Consistency with Community Character The proposed project is inconsistent with the existing community character. [—]NO AYES (See Part 1. C.2, C.3, D.2, E.3) I "Yes ", answer questions a - g, I "No ", proceed to Part 3. Relevant No, or Moderate Part I small to large Question(s) impact impact may may occur occur a. The proposed action may replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures, or areas De, E3f, E3g ® ❑ of historic importance to the community. b. The proposed action may create a demand for additional community services (e.g. C4 ® ❑ schools, police and fire) c. The proposed action may displace affordable or low-income housing in an area where C2, C3, Dlf ® ❑ there is a shortage of such housing. Dlg, Ela d. The proposed action may interfere with the use or enjoyment of officially recognized C2, E3 ® ❑ or designated public resources. e. The proposed action is inconsistent with the predominant architectural scale and C2, C3 ® ❑ character. f. Proposed action is inconsistent with the character of the existing natural landscape. C2, C3 ® ❑ Ela, Elb E2g, E2h g. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ PRINT FULL FORM I Page 10 of 10 Agency Use Project: I Berry & Berry LLC Date: Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 - Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance of Project Impacts and Determination of Significance Part 3 provides the reasons in support of the determination of significance. The lead agency must complete Part 3 for every question in Part 2 where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not, or may, result in a significant adverse environmental impact. Based on the analysis in Part 3, the lead agency must decide whether to require an environmental impact statement to further assess the proposed action or whether available information is sufficient for the lead agency to conclude that the proposed action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact. By completing the certification on the next page, the lead agency can complete its determination of significance. Reasons Supporting This Determination: To complete this section: • Identify the impact based on the Part 2 responses and describe its magnitude. Magnitude considers factors such as severity, size or extent of an impact. • Assess the importance of the impact. Importance relates to the geographic scope, duration, probability of the impact occurring, number of people affected by the impact and any additional environmental consequences if the impact were to occur. • The assessment should take into consideration any design element or project changes. • Repeat this process for each Part 2 question where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not, or may, result in a significant adverse environmental impact. • Provide the reason(s) why the impact may, or will not, result in a significant adverse environmental impact • For Conditional Negative Declarations identify the specific condition(s) imposed that will modify the proposed action so that no significant adverse environmental impacts will result. • Attach additional sheets, as needed. See Attached State Environmental Quality Review Negative Declaration Notice of Determination Non -Significance June 24, 2015 Determination of Significance - Type 1 and Unlisted Actions SEQR Status: ❑ Type 1 ❑✓ Unlisted Identify portions of EAF completed for this Project: © Part 1 ✓Q Part 2 © Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF, as noted, plus this additional support information Subiect File and considering both the magnitude and importance of each identified potential impact, it is the conclusion of the Southold Planning Board as lead agency that: ✓❑ A. This project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment, and, therefore, an environmental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued. ❑ B. Although this project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, that impact will be avoided or substantially mitigated because of the following conditions which will be required by the lead agency: There will, therefore, be no significant adverse impacts from the project as conditioned, and, therefore, this conditioned negative declaration is issued. A conditioned negative declaration may be used only for UNLISTED actions (see 6 NYCRR 617.d). ❑ C. This Project may result in one or more significant adverse impacts on the environment, and an environmental impact statement must be prepared to further assess the impact(s) and possible mitigation and to explore alternatives to avoid or reduce those impacts. Accordingly, this positive declaration is issued. Name of Action: Berry & Berry LLC Name of Lead Agency: Southold Planning Board Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Donald Wilcenski Title of Responsible Officer: Chair Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Date: C� Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible facer) f'j'� n �&,I Date: � g- For Further Information: Contact Person: Mark Terry, Principal Planner Address: 54375 State Route 25, P.O. Box 1179, Southold, NY 11971 Telephone Number: 631-765-1938 E-mail: Mark.Terry@town.southold.ny.us For Type 1 Actions and Conditioned Negative Declarations, a copy of this Notice is sent to: Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be principally located (e.g., Town / City / Village of) Other involved agencies (if any) Applicant (if any) Environmental Notice Bulletin: htti):,I/www.dec.nv.po-%,/cnb/enb.litinI PRINT FULL FORM I Page 2 of 2 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR - July 7, 2015 Ms. Melissa Butler 206 Lincoln Street Riverhead, NY 11901 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtowuny.gov Re: Close Hearing — Proposed Site Plan for Grace & Grit 55750 Main Road, ±64' n/e/o Hobart Road & NYS Rt. 25, Southold SCTM#1000-62-3-8 Zoning District: HB Dear Ms. Butler: A public hearing was held by the'Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, July 6, 2015 regarding the above -referenced Site Plan. The public hearing was closed. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, R Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR July 7, 2015 Abigail A. Wickham, Esq. P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck, New York 11952 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtow-nny.gov Re: Close Preliminary Hearing - Proposed Harold R. Reeve and Sons, Inc. Standard Subdivision Located on the n/s/o County Road 48, approximately 190' w/o Wickham Avenue, in Mattituck SCTM#1000-140-1-6 Zoning Districts: R-40 & B Dear Ms. Wickham: A Preliminary Public Hearing was held by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, July 6, 2015 regarding the above -referenced Standard Subdivision. The public hearing was held open. The next public meeting is scheduled for Monday, August 3, 2015. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR July 7, 2015 Mr. Michael A. Kimack 321 Riverside Drive Riverhead, NY 11901 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY. 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov Re: Close Hearing — Proposed Site Plan for Braun Seafood Retail Store 31000 Main Road, ±430' n/e/o of Stillwater Avenue & Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-103-1-1 Zoning District: General Business - B Dear Mr. Kimack: A public hearing was held by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, July 6, 2015 regarding the above -referenced Site Plan. The public hearing was closed. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR July 7, 2015 Mr. Albert J. Krupski, Jr. 2790 Skunk Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 www. southoldtownny.gov Re: Approval - Proposed Site Plan, for Krupski Farm Storage Building 38030 Route 25, ±745' n/e/o Skunk Lane & NYS Route 25, Peconic SCTM#1000-85-3-8 Zoning District: A -C Dear Mr. Krupski: The following resolutions were adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, July 6, 2015: WHEREAS, this Agricultural Site Plan is for the construction of a 62' x 30' (1,860 sq. ft.) agricultural storage building to replace an existing greenhouse on 19.5 acres in the A -C Zoning District, Peconic; and WHEREAS, on April 30, 2015, Albert Krupski, Jr, owner, submitted an application for Site Plan review; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to §280-133 C of the Southold Town Code, has the discretion to waive any or all of the requirements in §280-133 for those applications involving uses strictly related to agriculture as long as they are not necessary to further the objectives set forth in Town Code §280-129 to maintain public health,. safety, and welfare. The Planning Board has found that this application is eligible for a waiver of certain elements of the Site Plan requirements because it is an agricultural use, the details of which are included in the Staff Report dated May 18, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Southold Town Code §280-131 B (5), has the discretion to vary or waive the parking requirements for Site Plan Applications where doing so would not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety or general welfare, and will not have the effect of nullifying the Krupski Farm Storage Page 2 July 7, 2015 intent and provision of the Site Plan Requirements chapter of the Town Code. The Planning Board has found that this application is eligible for a waiver of parking requirements because there is no need to provide for parking - the application is for an agricultural use, the building is for owner use only and the parcel is large in size relative to the proposed structure (less than 1 % lot coverage); and WHEREAS, on May 21, 2015, the Planning Board formally accepted the agricultural application as complete for review with additional information required; and WHEREAS, on June 11, 2015, the Planning Board, pursuant to Southold Town Code §280-131 C., distributed the application to the required agencies for their comments; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) 6 NYCRR, Part 617.5 (c), has determined that the proposed action is a Type II Action as it falls within the following description for 6 NYCRR, Part 617.5(c)(3) agricultural farm management practices, including construction, maintenance and repair of farm, buildings and structures, and land use changes consistent with generally accepted principles of farming. The action is for the construction of a 62' x 30' (1,860 sq. ft.) metal farm storage building accessory to an existing farm operation including production, general farming and a farm stand; and WHEREAS, on June 16, 2015, the Town of Southold LWRP Coordinator reviewed the above -referenced project and has determined the proposed project to be consistent with Southold Town LWRP policies; and WHEREAS, on June 16, 2015, the Southold Town Engineer reviewed the above - referenced application and has determined that the proposed building and site meet the minimum requirements of Chapter 236 for Storm Water Management; and WHEREAS, on June 17, 2015, the Southold Town Fire Inspector reviewed and determined that there was adequate fire protection and emergency access for the site; and WHEREAS, on June 17, 2015, the Cutchogue Fire District determined there was adequate fire protection for the site; and WHEREAS, on June 18, 2015, the Architectural Review Committee reviewed the application and approved it as submitted; and WHEREAS, on July 6, 2015, the Southold Town Chief Building Inspector reviewed and certified the proposed Site Plan as a permitted use in the A -C Zoning District; and WHEREAS, on July 6, 201.5, the Southold Town Planning Board determined that all applicable requirements of the Site Plan Regulations, Article XXIV, §280 — Site Plan Approval of the Town of Southold, have been met; and Krupski Farm Storage Page 3 July 7, 2015 WHEREAS, on July 6, 2015, a public hearing was held and closed; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby waives certain Site Plan Application requirements as noted above; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby waives the parking requirements as noted above; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board has determined that this proposed action is a Type II Action and not subject to review under SEQRA; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board has determined that this proposed action is consistent with the policies of the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grants Approval to the Site Plan as shown on the survey of the property for SCTM#1000-85.-3-8 dated April 28, 2015, last revised by hand by Albert J. Krupski, Jr. on May 27, 2015, and authorizes the Chairman to endorse the Site Plan. Please also note the following requirements in the Southold Town Code relating to Site Plans: 1. Any outdoor lighting shall be shielded so the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light and glare within property boundaries. 2. All storm water run-off from grading, driveways and gravel areas must be contained on site. 3. Proposed storm water run-off containment systems must be inspected by the Town Engineer at the time of installation. Please call the Southold Town Engineer prior to beginning this work. 4. Approved Site Plans are valid for eighteen months from the date of approval, within which time all proposed work must be completed, unless the Planning Board grants an extension. 5. Any changes from the Approved Site Plan shall require Planning Board approval. 6. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Planning Board must inspect the site to ensure it is in conformity with the Approved Site Plan, and issue a final site inspection approval letter. Should the site be found not in conformance with the Approved Site Plan, no Certificate of Occupancy may be issued unless the Planning Board approves the changes to the plan. Krupski Farm Storage Page 4 July 7, 2015 A copy of the Approved Site Plan is enclosed for your records. One copy will also be sent to the Building Department and the Town Engineer/Highway Department. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman Encl. cc: Building Dept. w/map Town Engineer w/map PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR July 7, 2015 Mr. Albert J. Krupski, Jr. 2790 Skunk Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov Re: SEQRA Determination — Proposed Site Plan for Krupski Farm Storage Building 38030 Route 25, ±745' n/e/o Skunk Lane & NYS Route 25, Peconic SCTM#1000-85-3-8 Zoning District: A -C Dear Mr. Krupski: The Southold Town Planning Board adopted the following resolution at a meeting held on Monday, July 6, 2015: WHEREAS, this Agricultural Site Plan is for the construction of a 62' x 30' (1,860 sq. ft.) agricultural storage building to replace an existing greenhouse on 19.5 acres in' the A -C Zoning District, Peconic.; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) 6 NYCRR, Part 617.5 (c), has determined that the proposed action is a Type II Action as it falls within the following description for'6 NYCRR, Part 617.5(c)(3) agricultural farm management practices, including construction, maintenance and repair of farm buildings and structures, and land use changes consistent with generally accepted principles of farming. The action is for the construction of a 62'x 30' (1,860 sq. ft.) metal farm storage building accessory to an existing farm operation including production, general farming and a farm stand; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board has determined that this proposed action is a Type II Action and not subject to review under SEQRA. If you have any questions regarding the information contained in this resolution, please contact the Planning Board Office. Very truly yours, Donald J. iilce'n' ski Chairman