HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-8592V-
John M. Bredemeyer 111, President
Michael J. Domino, Vice -President
James F. King
Charles J. Sanders
Dave Bergen
r
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Rd.
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Telephone (631) 765-1892
Fax(631)765-6641
YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK, TO MAKE AN
APPOINTMENT FOR A PRE -CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO
SHALL BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND POSSIBLE REVOCATION OF THE
PERMIT. -
- - --- ---_ _----_---- - ---- ------.__1�ISP_E-CTLON SCHEDULE--- - -- - -- - _.__- --- . _--- ------ -
Pre -construction, silt fence
1St day of construction
'/ constructed
Project complete, compliance inspection
BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES
SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK
PERMIT NO. 8592 DATE: APRIL 22, 2015
ISSUED TO: BARBARA ADAMS
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 8100 INDIAN NECK LANE, PECONIC
SCTM# 86-7-9
AUTHORIZA'T'ION
Pursuant to.the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold and in
accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the meeting held on April 22, 2015, and in
consideration of application fee in the sum of $250.00 paid by Jan Nicholson and subject to the Terms and
Conditions as stated in the Resolution, the Southold Town Board of Trustees` authorizes and permits the
following:
Wetland Permit to demolish existing dwelling and garage and construct a new
3,198.12sq.ft. two-story, single-family dwelling; a 26.3'x8.3' attached rear seaward
deck; an 18.'5x18.1' front deck; with the condition to establish and subsequently
maintain a 15' wide non -turf buffer along top of bank; and no trees are to be pruned or
removed without further review of Board; and as depicted on the survey prepared by
Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor, last dated, April 21, 2015, and stamped approved
on April 22, 2015.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed,
and these presents to be subscribed by a maiority of the said Board as of this date.
�Q�OgU�Fli(�•coG
Q
s�
y
Charles J. Sanders- military leave of absence
i
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
The Permittee Barbara Adams, residing at 8100 Indian Neck Lane, Peconic, New York as part of
the consideration for the issuance of the Permit does understand and prescribe to the following:
1. That the said Board of Trustees and the Town of Southold are released from any and all
damages, or claims for damages, of suits arising directly or indirectly as a result of any
operation performed pursuant to this permit, and the said Permittee will, at his or her own
expense, defend any and all such suits initiated by third parties, and the said Permittee
assumes full liability with respect thereto, to -the complete exclusion of the Board of
Trustees of the Town of Southold.
2. That this Permit is valid for a period of 24 months, which is considered to be the estimated
time required to complete the work involved, but should circumstances warrant, request for
an extension may be made to the Board at a later date.
3. That this Permit should be retained indefinitely, or as long as the said Permittee wishes to
maintain the structure or project, involved, to provide evidence to anyone concerned that
authorization was originally obtained.
4.. That the work, involved will be subject to the inspection and approval of the Board or its
agents, and non-compliance with the provisions of the originating application may be cause
for revocation of this, Permit by resolution of the said Board.
That there will be no unreasonable interference with navigation as a result of the work
herein authorized.
6. That there shall be no interference with the right of the public to pass and repass along the
beach between high and low water marks.
7. That if future operations of the Town of Southold require the removal and/or alterations in
the -location .of the work herein authorized, or "if, in the opinion of the Board of Trustees,.
the work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to free navigation, the said Permittee will be
required, upon due notice, to remove or alter this work project herein stated without
expenses to the Town of Southold.
8. The Permittee is required to provide evidence that a copy of this Trustee permit has been
recorded with the Suffolk County Clerk's Office as a notice covenant and deed restriction
to the deed of the subject parcel. Such evidence shall be provided within ninety (90)
calendar days of issuance of this permit.
9. That the said Board will be notified by the Permittee of the completion of the work
authorized.
10. That the Permittee will obtain all other permits and consents that may be required
supplemental to this permit, which may be subject to revoke upon failure to obtain same.
11. This permit does not convey to the permittee any right to trespass upon the lands or
interfere with the riparian rights of others in order to perform the pennitted work nor does
it authorize the impairment of any rights, title, or interest in real or personal property held
or vested in a person not a party to the permit.
John M. Bredemeyer III, President
Michael J. Domino, Vice -President
James F. King, Trustee
Dave Bergen, Trustee
Charles J. Sanders, Trustee
April 22, 2015
Ms. Patricia C. Moore, Esq.
51020 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
RE: BARBARA ADAMS
8100 INDIAN NECK LANE, PECONIC
SCTM# 86-7-9
Dear Ms. Moore:
Town Hall Annex
54375 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971-0959
Telephone (631) 765-1892
Fax (631) 765-6641
The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on
Wednesday, April 2212015 regarding'the-aboVe-matter: -
WHEREAS, Patricia C. Moore, Esq. on behalf of BARBARA ADAMS applied to the
Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the
Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application
dated December 15, 2014, and,
WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory
Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings
and recommendations, and,
WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator recommended that the proposed application be
found Inconsistent with the LWRP, and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has furthered Policies 4.1 & 3.1 of the Local
Waterfront Revitalization Program to the greatest extent possible through the imposition
of the following Best Management Practice requirements: the proposed dwelling is to be
located further landward than originally applied for; to establish and subsequently
maintain a 15' wide non -turf buffer along the top of bank; and no trees are to be pruned
or removed within buffer without further review of Board; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said
application on January 21, 2015 and again on April 22, 201.5, at which time all
interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and,
WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the
premises in question and the surrounding area, and,
WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted
concerning this application, and,
WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 275 of the
Southold Town Code,
WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the
health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT,
RESOLVED, that for the mitigating factors and based upon the Best Management
Practice requirement imposed above, the Board of Trustees deems the action to be
Consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program pursuant to Chapter 268-5
of the Southold Town Code, and,
RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approve the application of BARBARA ADAMS
to demolish existing dwelling and garage and construct a new 3,198.12sq.ft. two-story,
single-family dwelling; a 26.3'x8.3' attached rear seaward deck; an 18.'5x18.1' front
deck; with the condition to establish and subsequently maintain a 15' wide non -turf
buffer along top of bank; and no trees are to be pruned or removed without further
review of Board; and as depicted_on the survey_ prepared by_Howard W. Young, Land
Surveyor, last dated April 21, 2015, and stamped approved on April 22, 2015.
Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date the permit
is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the
date of this notification.
Inspections are required at a fee of $50.00 per inspection. (See attached schedule.)
Fees: $50.00
Very truly yours,
006
John M. Bredemeyer III
President, Board of Trustees
JMB/amn
John M. Bredemeyer III, President
Michael J. Domino, Vice -President
James F. King
Charles J. Sanders
Dave Bergen
TO: P41- fG 1(1 1.
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall Annex
54375 Route 25, P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Telephone (631) 765-1892
Fax(631)765-6641
S
Please be advised that your application dated 12 has been
reviewed by this Board at the regular meeting of 4111lb5 and
your application has been approved pending the completion of t66 foil wing items
checked off below.
Revised Plans for proposed project
Pre -Construction Silt Fence Inspection Fee ($50.00)
1st Day of Construction ($50.00)
Final Inspection Fee ($50.00)
Dock Fees ($3.00 per sq. ft.)
Permit fees are now due. Please make check or money order payable to Town of
Southold. The fee is computed below according to the schedule of rates as set forth in
Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code.
The following fee must be paid within 90 days or re-application fees will be necessary.
You will receive your permit upon completion of the above.
COMPUTATION OF PERMIT FEES:
TOTAL FEES DUE: $ 56 too
BY: John M. Bredemeyer III, President
Board of Trustees
Jan Nicholson
419 East 501h Street
New York, NY 10022
April 14, 2015
Southold Town Board of Trustees
Southold Town Hall Annex
54375 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Dear President Bredemeyer and Members of the Board:
APR 2 1 2015
5
. _. _ ._••"'t: .,(ru;�„.fir._
I write on behalf of Barbara Adams, who is the applicant for a permit to build a
house at 8100 Indian Neck Lane in Peconic. As you know, I am her contract vendee.
The central issue that has emerged in this application is the setback of the proposed
house from the water, the Peconic Bay coastline.
I have given considerable thought to the discussion that Pat Moore and I had with
you on January 21” and to your discussion with Rob Herrmann on March 11th, which
he relayed to me. Thank you very much for meeting with him at the site. I have
sympathy for the responsibility you carry and the fact you must consider the
ramifications of each decision you make. I would therefore like to suggest a revised
layout, which I hope and believe will satisfy all of our interests in a way that will
avoid prolonging the review process any further, and which I show in the attached
amended site plan.
I have listened to my advisors explain the laws pertaining to the setback issue with
some struggle, because the laws lack clarity. Many people must experience some
bewilderment. I have come to believe that the question as to whether the current
application is non -conforming devolves to the question whether the drop from the
upland plateau to the beach is truly a precipitously sloped "bluff' as defined by
Town Code or simply a minimal and ordinary change in elevation that occurs as the
upland slopes down to the beach. The former would require a 100 -foot setback
from that ridge for my house, while the latter would not. When I, the prospective
owner, look at the matter, I see this property in isolation and think that a seven -foot
drop I can walk down is clearly not a bluff. But then I put myself in your shoes. I
think of your responsibility to protect the coast from storms that are increasingly
ferocious, a trend of unknown extent. I think of all the applications that will come
over the years, some of which could seek to build on precedent set here, claiming
there is no bluff. Where to draw the line? For a shoreline much steeper than we
have here, I wouldn't want to be vulnerable to having to argue the point. Taking the
long view—as you must—I would protect my ability to fulfill my responsibilities
under laws that are unhelpful in their lack of clarity. I would maintain a policy that
if it isn't flat, it's a bluff. I am sympathetic to the, weight of the consequences you
must consider.
�_ J
Southold Town Board of Trustees
Page 2
I am sure that, for your part, you can see the impact your position has on me. The
house next door to the west is particularly close to the water and does not appear to
have been subject to a "bluff' setback when it was taken down to the studs and
rebuilt about five years ago. Thus, that house is there to stay for a very long time
and, together with the five cedars on the waterside of the applicant property, creates
a feeling of enclosure rather than openness to the view, and the tunnel effect is
intensified as the subject house is pulled back from the water. It is the quality of the
view of the Bay that one is buying.
Could we reach an agreement that would allow us both to move forward? My
proposal consists of a plan with the dwelling and deck redesigned so that the entire
structure fits within an envelope for which the nearest corner now is 10 feet farther
landward, 85 feet from the bulkhead. It is my understanding that at this location the
house would be at least 108 feet back from the spring high tide line and 116 feet
back from mean high tide. Because the property is a wedge that narrows in the
landward direction, I also needed to reduce the width of the house by one foot.
Let me please also acknowledge in retrospect that I understand my original
application to the Zoning Board for a 50 -foot setback from the bulkhead was
unrealistic. I had simply looked at where the other houses down the row are located
and thought that my proposal fit nicely in line. I appreciate the attending issues
better now.
I offer this proposal with much good will. I hope you will consider it.
Sincerely,
q- I . j -A LP---
4 -
John Bredemeyer, President �oSUFF014-0 Town Hall Annex
Michael J. Domino, Vice -President ,`°° °Gy 54375 Route 25
James F. King y x P.O. Box 1179
Charles J. Sanders • Southold, NY 11971
Dave Bergen y�41 ,� �a Telephone (631) 765-1892
r Fax (631) 765-6641
Southold Town Board of Trustees
Field Inspection/Work Session Report
Date/Time:
Patricia C. Moore, Esq. on behalf of BARBARA ADAMS requests a Wetland Permit to
demolish existing dwelling and garage and construct a new 3,198.12sq.ft. two-story,
single-family dwelling; a 26.3'x8.3' attached rear seaward deck; and an 18.'5x18.1' front
deck. Located: 8100 Indian Neck Lane, Peconic. SCTM# 86-7-9
Type of area to be impacted:
Saltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland Sound Bay
Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland
Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: Chapt.275 Chapt. 111 other
Type of Application: Wetland Coastal Erosion Amendment
Administrative Emergency Pre -Submission Violation
Notice of Hearing card posted on property: Yes No Not Applicable
Storm Water Management Review: Yes No Not Applicable
Info needed:
Modifications:
Conditions:
Present Were: J. Bredemeyer M. Domino J. King C. Sanders D. Bergen
Bay Constable Other
Form filled out in the field by
Mailed/Faxed to:
Date:
Barbara Adams
11 Indian• SCTM# 86-7-9{
-.
{
y _ ! At'
L Air.,.�.. _
I : - `� � '' � tit "� � s�" .�- :�,�•�`��.' �� �
i.AN
_ n
lki1 �a
c
7
« ,q.`_ `* .. � �/Q's7�►._.�1"•� ..cmr�p� w� 4
ML
to al
r
ata �� '.�� ,.. r' a P� q� a.�a:• r�. ��'
3/11/2015 12 04
3
John Bredemeyer, President guFFlltir
Michael J. Domino, Vice -President
James F. King y z
Charles J. Sanders •
Dave Bergen
Town Hall Annex
54375 Route 25
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Telephone (631) 765-1892
Fax (631) 765-6641
Southold Town Board of Trustees
Field Inspection/Work Session Report
Date/Time: 2 / l -4S
Patricia C. Moore, Esq. on behalf of BARBARA ADAMS requests a Wetland Permit to
demolish existing dwelling and garage and construct a new 3,198.12sq.ft. two-story,
single-family dwelling; a 26.3'x8.3' attached rear seaward deck; and an 18.'5x18.1' front
deck. Located: 8100 Indian Neck Lane, Peconic. SCTM# 86-7-9
Type of area to be impacted:
Saltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland Sound Bay
Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland
Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: Chapt.275 _
Type of Application: Wetland Coastal Erosion
Administrative Emergency Preubmission _
Notice of Hearing card posted on property: /Yes No
Storm Water Management Review: Yes
Info needed:
Modifications:
Chapt.111 other
Amendment
Violation
Not Applicable
No Not Applicable
F lUOUIII VVGIU. 1 .O. UIUUUIIIUy1UI - IV[. VU111111V
Bay Constable
Form filled out in the field by
Mailed/Faxed to:
Date:
=u. IVIIy - v.
Other
%J C41 I%A%_1 J
V. IJ l\J.-' l
Adams Pl
1 1 r a t s /
s �•
, wi
WV
� r
;d.
. Az_�_
- - ,. -. - .... /_•!~x ��'^. Y _''mss. `,�s.._'
i
t /� If M1� ➢. <' Ak.' Nam
tv
1.
irbara Adams
F-00 Indian Neck Lane, Peconic
(14/15
vs
t 11
111111111
40:111 Aw
a
PW w. ffi
t
�r✓
Y
H "J�
•
Y�~
�'�.. .+�' eK}•. Z4r ?•
a��
�,,�F-i� i
.� 'cam •sem., � 4'
G ,
f
+G w
/
7
i
t /� If M1� ➢. <' Ak.' Nam
tv
1.
Aft
1P dor
,or
� i � .. � • � �, ,� j _1 Y tet, • ��. i.. •� �,p4/1
,Mir' , ; , ,• , �,�, .. * I
ti 3, ♦. s lei , :: u� !►
.�46�1 (/
IL
•
John Bredemeyer, President suFFot
Michael J. Domino, Vice -President
James F. King y
Charles J. Sanders •
Dave Bergen
Town Hall Annex
54375 Route 25
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Telephone (631) 765-1892
Fax (631) 765-6641
Southold Town Board of Trustees
Field Inspection/Work Session Report
Datefrime:
Patricia C. Moore, Esq. on behalf of BARBARA ADAMS requests a Wetland Permit to
demolish existing dwelling and garage and construct a new 3,198.12sq.ft. two-story,
single-family dwelling; a 26.3'x8.3' attached rear seaward deck; and an 18.'5x18.1' front
deck. Located: 8100 Indian Neck Lane, Peconic. SCTM# 86-7-9
Type of area to be impacted:
Saltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland Sound Bay
Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland I
Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: ---Chapt.275 Chapt. 111 other
Type of Application: Wetland Coastal Erosion Amendment
Administrative Emergency Pre -submission Violation
Notice of Hearing card posted on property: Yes No Not Applicable
Storm Water Management Review:
Info needed:
Modifications:
Yes No Not Applicable
Conditions: TC e'C�_4 4_'o
Present Were
Bay Constable
J. Bredemeyer M. Domino J. King_C. Sanders D. Bergen
Form filled out in the field by
Mailed/Faxed to:
Date:
Other
i
y yti
tVIT,
wt. � t .f :� �
`.
Kiri<r► et
1
i5AFA
M NO
11.i1
i
A � 01,
AL
I
�
�
3:
_
lw
3:
_
SCTM: 1000-86-7-9
8 100 INDIAN NECK LA
PECONIC NY 11958
Ak'
X9
.W N
ell
V'AV
N4,
'4N�
44"m
4 It-!
Wer
V-0 I
• v
4 � _
SCTM: 1000-86-7-9
8100 INDIAN NECK LA '�
PECONIC NY 11958 *�
. x� '� -jam... �' - e v� T Z, '. �- i M_'r ! !.•�;, rr.
r 3 • t G�
S "
' T:h + �'LY t;r+'4� /,• s_
• i '.rte<'e�a}1!"'�
.. '.; c .� � ,'+ �• r ��. Ate,#'
ipl
t t�
7' + , '4 f (•) '� • 1� sem, / / i } = r
04.
IV
41* r� ;�.Ev;'� , y � ��-;qy, .. /' /�K+yrc�swf� , : ;+ •••'• �� �r , .�'k . � 1 7 �. .
'
40-
�H I'M 1
_ ..A r
., ., �•�+•, � �,�A- � t , ♦`JAI ��•!; ��" .�1
Nei.•n - ., _ •+ tip• � rr �y �?^4`' > 1• ,>A��f'' i !•.� �� '�'? .�
aT�'� t• n,�ugt �y4•... w k r_ :a�. ai`I:�a t 41 i'.x,. i ? c 'ir� 1 �'•�h.�r:.,a- i. r
4"s
pi
6w" d
lit
k r
je
ifia��3��r���. �t���y.tr,V��- a L ..r�ry t� 'd / )1r . `5 4. ?l3r v .. �, r. ��3
fir&
-C iP
it
SCTM: 1000-86-7-9
8100 INDIAN NECK LA
PECONIC NY 11958
FORM NO. 4
TOWN 01= SOUTHOLD
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Office of the Building Inspector ?i.,
Town Hall
Southold, N.Y.
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPMCY
L
No Z-25262 Date SEPTEMBER 11, 1997
THIS CERTIFIES that the building ACCESSORY
i1� dii�.r!
U DEC 1 5 2014
S')t1fl10Ed bwri�
Location of Property 8100 INDIAB NECX LAW PSCONZC, N.X.
House No. Street Hamlet
County Tax Map No. 1000 section 86 Block 7 Lot 9
Subdivision
Filed Map No. Lot No.
conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore
filed in this office dated SBPTSMBSR 27f 1997 pursuant to which
Building Permit No. 23715—Z dated SEPTEMBER 24, 1996
was issued, and conforms to all'of the requirements of the applicable
provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is
issued is ACCESSORY STOMB SHED IN BIDS YARD AS APPLI$D FOA & AS PRR
ZM 14406.
The certificate is issued to BARBARA ADAMS
(owner)
of the aforesaid bu-ilding.
SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALT$ APPROVAL N/A
UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. N/A
PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED N/A
Rev. 1/81
z iz #
ld' g inspector
FORM No. 4
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
office of the Building Inspector
Town Hall
Southold, N.X.
cE1ZTX1;ICATE OF OCCUPANCY
No 5-25263 Date SEPTEMBER 11, 1997
DEC 1 5 2014`^
Cc,}ihold �loi�.n
Ri
THIS CERTIFIES that the building ADDITION
Location of Property 8300 INDIAN NECK L]m PE 01 N.Y.
House No. Street Hamlet
County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 86- Block 7 Lot^ 9
subdivision Filed Map No. Lot No.
conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore
filed in this office dated AUGUST 2B, 1996 pursuant to which
Building Permit No. '23689—z dated SE 24, 1996
was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable
provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is
issued is D= ADDITION TO EXISTING ONE FAMILY DWELLING AS APPiIED FOR
The certificate is issued to BARBARA ADAMS
(owner)
of the aforesaid building.
SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL N/A
UNDERWRITERS CERTIff'ICATE NO. N/A
PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED
Rev. 1/81
N/A
c
u' c3i g Inspector
i- ii. # Eti9ti59L � ZE:£1�ti6-51-80
weo-r.09 off. Y r[cauc yyy FOR PLL NO FOR PCL NO. - -------- -- �—
FOR ML NO.
4.M SEESEC NO
W-403 1
0
MN, 12
2.IA(.)
13
0
82-r.)
TOM OFROMOLD
12
27
w') fl I% S.BAIcI
etU
CjjEEK
01 0t tOD \-45-
41
FOR -1 NO.
REE.sc'..
11.3
X.2
AA(d
06"
7.3
FOR NO
7
�Pr
-n. UNE
SEESEC NO.MB
i,;A
L COUNTY OF SUFFOLK K SOUTNO.
NOTICE o., E SECTION NO
Real Property Tax ?8Service Agency y
N
E
*;>'
. A
1-5
PROPER-P
Board of Trustees
Town of Southold
Main Road,
Southold, NY 11971
By Hand
PATRICIA C. MOORE
Attorney at Law
51020 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Tel: (631) 765-4330
Fax: (631) 765-4643
www.mooregMs.co
s.com
email: pcmoorekmooreattys.com
April 21, 2015
RE: Adams (Nicholson contract vendee)
Sctm: 1000-86-7-9
Premises: 8190 Indian Neck Lane, Peconic
Dear President Bredemeyer and Board members:
APR 2 1 2015
With reference to the above and pursuant to our prior hearing and your meeting with Rob
Hermann of En Consultants, enclosed please find my client's letter to the Board together with a
revised survey by Young and Young last dated April 21, 2015.
We have revised the plan so that both the dwelling and deck fits within the envelope for
which the nearest corner now is 10 feet father landward, 85 feet from the bulkhead.
Please make this part of our application and we sincerely appreciate your consideration at
the public hearing on April 22, 2015.
Thank you and please do'riot hesitate to call should you
cc: Ms. Jan Nicholson
Ms. Barbara Adams c/o Abigail Wickham Esq.
encls.
any questions.
Board of Trustees
Town of Southold
Main Road
Southold NY 11971
PATRICIA C. MOORE
Attorney at Law
51020 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Tel: (631) 765-4330
Fax; (631) 765-4643
www.mooreattvs.com
RE: ADAMS
SCTM- 1000-86-7-9
Dear President Bredemeyer and board members:
email: P-cmoore chi moot ".com
March 17, 2015
Fr)
n
MAR 1 7 2015
.-A
With reference to the above, please let this serve as our request to adiourn this,matter,
from this month's hearing calendar and place on the Board's April calendar.
Thank you for your continued courtesies in this matter.
Vttl Wurs,
--atricia C. Moore
PCM/bp
encls.
EN -CONSULTANTS
John Bredemeyer, Chairman
Board of Trustees
Town of Southold
P.O Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Barbara Adams, 8100 Indian Neck Lane, Peconic
Dear Mr. Bredemeyer:
March 2, 2015
ly
VAR 10 2015
Siu +;t;;iP _
As En -Consultants has been authorized by Barbara Adams to assist Jan Nicholson, her contract vendee,
and Patricia Moore with the process of securing a Wetlands Permit .to construct a new dwelling on the
captioned property, I have under separate cover requested a meeting with the Board at the property next
Wednesday during your March field inspections. In anticipation of that meeting, I would like to offer the
following comments.
I understand that the applicant has proposed a new dwelling set back 75' from the existing concrete
seawall in accordance with variance relief issued by the Board of Appeals, while the Board of Trustees
has recommended constructing the new dwelling nearer to the location of the existing dwelling, 100: feet
or more landward of the seawall. It is also my understanding that the applicant has supported her position
by referencing the locations of other similarly located dwellings along the shoreline and that the Board
has supported its position by referencing the location of the existing dwelling. Although both
perspectives offer potentially compelling arguments for where the reconstructed dwelling might be
located, I believe additional perspective would be gained by determining where the dwelling would need
to be situated to conform to the minimum setback requirements set forth by Chapter 275 for Trustees
jurisdictional areas.
To that end, we must first determine the extent of the Trustees' jurisdiction over the property, which is
defined by §275-3(C) as follows:
C. Jurisdiction. The following areas are subject to protection under Chapter 275 of the Code of Southold.
[Amended 10-11-2005 by L.L. No. 17-2005, 10-9-2012 by L.L. No. 12-20121
aLAny freshwater wetland, tidal wetland, beach, bluff, dune, flat, marsh, swamp, wet meadow, bog, or vernal pool,
QLAny creep estuary, stream, pond, canal, or lake;
QLLand under water; -
aLand subject to tidal action,
f&Land within 100 feet of the areas listed above, '
&LAll Town waters.
There exists on or adjacent to the subject property a beach; land under water; and land subject to tidal
action, thus tidal wetlands. Therefore, it must next be determined what minimum setbacks would apply to
a dwelling located adjacent to one of those jurisdictional areas. The minimum setbacks required for all
operations proposed within Trustees jurisdiction are set forth by §275-3(D) as follows:
1319 North Sea Road I Southampton, New York 11968 1 p 631.283.6360 1 f 631.283.6136 www.enconsu[tants.com
environmental consulting
aLThe following minimum setbacks apply to any and all operations proposed on residential property within the
jurisdiction of the Board of Trustees:
Wetland boundary.
[_j_Residence: 100 feet.
LLDriveway. 50 feet.
Ly Sanitary leaching pool (cesspool): 100 feet.
[,LSeptic tank: 75 feet.
L�L,Swimming pool and related structures: 50 feet.
MLLandscaping or gardening: 50 feet.
[1Placement of C & D material. 100 feet.
To
p of bluff.
[Amended 10-9-2012 by L.L. No. 12-20121
[aResidence: 100 feet.
[1Driveway: 100 feet.
[Sanitary leaching pool (cesspool): 100 feet.
[4l Swimming pool and related structures: 50 feet.
Because there is no minimum setback required from a "beach," the applicable setback requirement would
be that set forth by §275-3(D)(1)(a)(1),,which requires a residence to be set back 100' from the tidal
wetlands boundary. Given the absence of wetland vegetation and the defmition of tidal wetlands set forth
in §275-2, it would be customary to use the mean high water line as the tidal wetlands boundary.
Therefore, the enclosed survey has been updated to reflect the current location of mean high water;' which
at this time is located at least 30 feet seaward of the existing seawall.
(Please note that the survey has also been revised to replace the term "bluff" with "bank," as it is my
professional opinion that no bluff exists on this property. The term "bluff' is defined by §275-2 as "any
bank or cliff with a precipitous or steeply sloped face adjoining a beach or body of water. Although
admittedly the definition allows for a potentially broad and subjective interpretation of what constitutes a
"clifF' or a "precipitous" slope, the width of the slope on the subject property ranges from approximately
9 to 15 feet and has a maximum change in vertical elevation of only 7 feet).
So if the dwelling were to be set back 75 feet from the seawall and the seawall is located 30 feet landward
of mean high water, the dwelling would be situated a conforming 105' distance from the tidal wetlands
boundary if mean high water is established as the wetlands boundary. If a more conservative estimate of
the tidal wetlands boundary were used, such as the mean high water spring/spring high water line, the
wetlands boundary would be located marginally closer to the seawall.
Therefore, I would like the Board to at least consider the above described code requirements and field
conditions and evaluate the staked. location of the proposed dwelling accordingly. Your time and
consideration will be most appreciated.
Enclosures
2
Resp tfully yours,
Robert E. Herrmann
Coastal Management Specialist
Cantrell, Elizabeth
From:
Robert Herrmann <rherrmann@enconsultants.com>
Sent:
Thursday, March 05, 2015 6:06 PM
To:
Cantrell, Elizabeth; Nunemaker, Amanda
Subject:
Adams (Nicholson, 8100 Indian Neck)
Attachments:
20150305175809.pdf, 20150305175344.pdf
Liz/Amanda, if Jim comes in tomorrow morning per usual, please ask him to take a look at the attached and also make
available to any of the other Trustees who may come in to review application materials prior to Wednesday's field
inspections. We are putting hard copies in the mail as well.
Thanks,
Rob
Robert E. Herrmann, MEM
Coastal Management Specialist
En -Consultants
1319 North Sea Road
Southampton, NY 11968
Phone: 631-283-.6360
Fax: 631-283-6136
Email: rherrmann@enconsultants.com
www.enconsultants.com
1
EN -CONSULTANTS
March 2, 2015
John Bredemeyer, Chairman
Board of Trustees
Town of Southold
P.O Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971 MAR -6 2015 i J
Re: Barbara Adams, 8100 Indian Neck sane, Peconic
Dear Mr. Bredemeyer:
As En -Consultants has been authorized by Barbara Adams to assist Jan Nicholson, her contract vendee,
and Patricia Moore with the process of securing a Wetlands Permit to construct a new dwelling on the
captioned property, I have under separate cover requested a meeting with the Board at the property next
Wednesday during your March field inspections. In anticipation of that meeting, I would like to offer the
following comments.
I understand that the applicant has proposed a new dwelling set back 75' from the existing concrete
seawall in accordance with variance relief issued by the Board of Appeals, while the Board of Trustees
has recommended constructing the new dwelling nearer to the location of the existing dwelling, 100 feet
or more landward of the seawall. It is also my understanding that the applicant has supported her position
by referencing the locations of other similarly located dwellings along the shoreline and that the Board
has supported its position by referencing the location of the existing dwelling. Although both
perspectives offer potentially compelling arguments for where the reconstructed dwelling might be
located, I believe additional perspective would be gained by determining where the dwelling would need
to be situated to conform to the minimum setback requirements set forth by Chapter 275 for Trustees
jurisdictional areas.
To that end, we must first determine the extent of the Trustees' jurisdiction over the property, which is
defined by §275-3(C) as follows:
C. Jurisdiction. The following areas are subject to protection under Chapter 275 of the Code ofSouthold.
(Amended 10-11-2005 by L.L. No. 17-2005; 10-9-2012 by L.L. No. 12-20121
(1ZAny freshwater wetland, tidal wetland, beach, bluff, dune, flat, marsh, swamp, wet meadow, bog, or vernal pool,
aAny creek, estuary, stream, pond, canal, or lake;
f&,Land under water;
aLand subject to tidal action;
f aLand within 100 feet of the areas listed above,
f�All Town waters.
There exists on or adjacent to the subject property a beach; land under water; and land subject to tidal
action, thus tidal wetlands. Therefore, it must next be determined what minimum setbacks would apply to
a dwelling located adjacent to one of those jurisdictional areas. The minimum setbacks required .for all
operations proposed within Trustees jurisdiction are set forth by §275-3(D) as follows:
1319 North Sea Road I Southampton, New York 11968 1 p 631.283.6360 1 f 631.283.6136
environmental consulting
The following minimum setbacks apply to any and all operations proposed on residential properly within the
jurisdiction of the Board of Trustees:
•(Wetland boundary.
[Residence: 100 feet.
LLDriveway: 50 feet.
[-j-Sanitary leaching pool (cesspool): 100 feet.
[1Septic tank: 75 feet.
[ LSwimming pool and related structures: 50 feet.
[�LI,andscaping or gardening. 50 feet.
L LPlacement of C & D material. 100 feet.
• b Top of bluff.
[Amended 10-9-2012 by L.L. No. 12-20121
[ jResidence: 100 feet.
[2LDriveway. 100 feet.
[Sanitary leaching pool (cesspool): 100 feet.
(,fl Swimming pool and related structures: 50 feet.
Because there is no minimum setback required from a "beach," the applicable setback requirement would
be that set forth by §275-3(D)(1)(a)(1), which requires a residence to be set back 100' from the tidal
wetlands boundary. Given the absence of wetland vegetation and the definition of tidal wetlands set forth
in §275-2, it would be customary to use the mean high water line as the tidal wetlands boundary.
Therefore, the enclosed survey has been updated to reflect the current location of mean high water; which
at this time is located at least 30 feet seaward of the existing seawall.
(Please note that the survey has also been revised to replace the term "bluff' with "bank," as it is my
professional opinion that no bluff exists on this property. The term "bluff' is defined by §275-2 as "any
bank or cliff with a precipitous or steeply sloped face adjoining a beach or body of water. Although
admittedly the definition allows for a potentially broad and subjective interpretation of what constitutes a
"cliff' or a "precipitous" slope, the width of the slope on the subject property ranges from approximately
9 to 15 feet and has a maximum change in vertical elevation of only 7 feet).
So if the dwelling were to be set back 75 feet from the seawall and the seawall is located 30 feet landward
of mean high water, the dwelling would be situated a conforming 105' distance from the tidal wetlands
boundary if mean high water is established as the wetlands boundary. If a more conservative estimate of
the tidal wetlands boundary were used, such as the mean high water spring/spring high water line, the
wetlands boundary would be located marginally closer to the seawall.
Therefore, I would like the Board to at least consider the above described code requirements and field
conditions and evaluate the staked location of the proposed dwelling accordingly. Your time and
consideration will be most appreciated.
Enclosures
2
Respectfully yours,
Robert E. Herrmann
Coastal Management Specialist
�P'LTIKO fbL\6.p\tILO {IOL\{laL\�tl :31tf oN0
b0 - LO — 9B "%j°°s 0001 —. .10H xol n;uno0
AZA'aM IlKa3W'PNIa-IIM
�iJOJ, M0N'Fqun0'J �jjo44n5
P1041no5 30 uMO1 'OluoOed }O
NOGIOK)IN N yr
210= Jk3AN(IS
j -7N[ 39VNIV 4 - IC CNnoj 3W19 =® GS SR FVIS =Q CNnOd iNSW UOW -B 1=51N3 nOW = Q
.NW 3Lva 3OHVt6'IWll
,w Wom a3ivx s
32-I ulvmvno3 aloZ Wald
wK0:11 - slpZ w wj -Aa !old vEo� puo;p :AB oaLLold
F rte•," ` ES25b 'CRl "SI'SAN '91:p0:. M CiSVMOii
.l
' " atjV9 "IVN019ati dO NOILVIOO"1V
Osom CHV 9 3011'N D
-,w Ni zw svm
S
fNC3570HaIN NV(` 01 ,1i113�0 Aff3iL�f SM.
NOIlyOId1121�J r�,210,1�T�(IS
_vo7i4�1d'7so1 '7 7+�i�2!
a ISLG 1�lssodo-u ,; lcm -v 16MC
joaul6uy loucl66ojo{d 'Y�I�b1 7 6owoµi
�afianJnS P-1'5—,\ M Pm
wo>6ulnouloua6unofi®ulwpv
741aLLL'IE9'—j EoEL'LCL'IE9'Io}
10611 I-.\ MON'P�WoNt1'onr nV »Fm�i60 OOy
/-moi J
/ =IV
�.
i
'I.-0OL'6C' f
M 4910'XKI9E 'ON 73VVd NH 31VL1 30NYTJR�TII COO-WOId 3=S
'1d '05 GMS='d321V
G21ON
Mr
IILO-EIO..r,CN 'GN 60f'
G9
04 OL O 04
61OC OL 'H
dd�
51 @� I E3�—
410E I>9
�ILVW �y1tM N91H
I L
6 O I
viva 3N W2ild calyVICHI
1�'c�Cb'3i�1(5 43GV3YI�b
31VQ
SNOIWG1 -0 cdo'aN
6U0161Aa>?J j0 PK06�
EIOG'10 'AON
CSWdSTJd dvW
610C'0E'100
a3L1dWO0 J3A2TG CT31d
b0 - LO — 9B "%j°°s 0001 —. .10H xol n;uno0
AZA'aM IlKa3W'PNIa-IIM
�iJOJ, M0N'Fqun0'J �jjo44n5
P1041no5 30 uMO1 'OluoOed }O
NOGIOK)IN N yr
210= Jk3AN(IS
j -7N[ 39VNIV 4 - IC CNnoj 3W19 =® GS SR FVIS =Q CNnOd iNSW UOW -B 1=51N3 nOW = Q
.NW 3Lva 3OHVt6'IWll
,w Wom a3ivx s
32-I ulvmvno3 aloZ Wald
wK0:11 - slpZ w wj -Aa !old vEo� puo;p :AB oaLLold
F rte•," ` ES25b 'CRl "SI'SAN '91:p0:. M CiSVMOii
.l
' " atjV9 "IVN019ati dO NOILVIOO"1V
Osom CHV 9 3011'N D
-,w Ni zw svm
S
fNC3570HaIN NV(` 01 ,1i113�0 Aff3iL�f SM.
NOIlyOId1121�J r�,210,1�T�(IS
_vo7i4�1d'7so1 '7 7+�i�2!
a ISLG 1�lssodo-u ,; lcm -v 16MC
joaul6uy loucl66ojo{d 'Y�I�b1 7 6owoµi
�afianJnS P-1'5—,\ M Pm
wo>6ulnouloua6unofi®ulwpv
741aLLL'IE9'—j EoEL'LCL'IE9'Io}
10611 I-.\ MON'P�WoNt1'onr nV »Fm�i60 OOy
/-moi J
/ =IV
�.
i
'I.-0OL'6C' f
M 4910'XKI9E 'ON 73VVd NH 31VL1 30NYTJR�TII COO-WOId 3=S
'1d '05 GMS='d321V
G21ON
mmFwAt
EN -CONSULTANTS
John Bredemeyer, Chairman
Board of Trustees
'['own of Southold
P.O Box 1179
Southold, NY 1.1971
March 2, 2015
Re: Reguest for Site Meeting at 5100 Indian Neck Lane, Peconic (Property of Barbara Adams,
SCT..M 1.000-86-7-9)
Dear Mr. Bredemeyer:
En -Consultants has been authorized by Barbara Adams, the applicant and owner of the subject property,
to assist Jan Nicholson, the contract vendee for the subject property, and her agent and attorney, Patricia
Moore, to assist with their effort to secure a Wetlands Permit for the captioned property on behalf of Ms.
Adams.
To that end, 1 would like to meet with the Trustees at the property to discuss the pending application
during their upcoming field inspections on March 11, 2015, at which time they may also inspect the
recently staked location of the currently proposed dwelling.
Attached for that purpose is a letter signed by Ms. Adams authorizing En -Consultants to access her
property and participate in the process of securing land use approvals from the Board of Trustees and
other involved regulatory agencies.
Please confirm that the Board will be able to meet me next Wednesday, and I thank you for your attention
to my request.
-,
� 1v Ifi
MAR 3 2015
Lam.-....-_ --.,�✓ J.},,,,:,� I.)rrit `'
Enclosures
yours,
Robert E. Herrmann
Coastal Management Specialist
1319 North Sea Road I Southampton, New York 11968 1 p 631.283.6360 1 f 631.283.6136 www.enconsuitants.corn
environmental consulting
t MAR 3 2015
To Whom It May Concern:
I, Barbara Adams, owner of 8100 Indian Neck Road, Peconic, New York, property bearing
Suffolk County Tax Map No. 1000-86-7-9, do hereby authorize En -Consultants, acting on
behalf of Jan Nicholson, contract vendee, to access my property and participate in the
process of securing land use approvals from the Town of Southold Trustees and any other
regulatory agencies necessary for Ms. Nicholson to construct a new dwelling and
appurtenances on my property. This authorization shall in no way obligate the
undersigned to be responsible for any of En -Consultants' fees or costs, which shall be
borne entirely by Ms. Nicholson.
Dated: M6
Barbara Adams
Board of Trustees
Town of Southold
via email
PATRICIA C. MOORE
Attorney at Law
51020 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Tel: (631) 765-4330
Fax: (631)
February 13, 2015
RE: ADAMS(NICHOLSON CV)
PROPERTY ADDRESS:8100 INDIAN NECK LANE, PECONIC
SCTM: 1000-86-7-9
Dear President Bredemeyer:
Please let this serve as a request to postpone the above
matter from the February 18, 2015 hearing until the following
month.
Thank you.
V r truly yours,
atricia C. oore
PCM by
FEB 1 8 2015 w
i
,1F
Imo.. .... .... _. -- .
Board of Trustees
Town of Southold
via email
PATRICIA C. MOORE'
Attomey at Law
51020 Main Road
Southold, New York. 11971
Tel; (631) 765-4330
I -'ax: (631) 765-4643
February 1.3, 2015
RE: ADAMS(NICHOLSON CV)
PROPERTY ADDRESS:8100 INDIAN NECK LANE, PECONIC
SCTM: 1000-86-7-9
Dear President Bredemeyer:
Please let this serve as a request to postpone the above
matter from the February 18, 2015 hearing until.. the following
month.
Thank you.
PCM bp
('1
- ---- ------
FEB 1 8 2015
yt'�. truly yours,
U(.;
'atricia C.
OFFICE LOCATION:
Town Hall Annex
54375 State Route 25
"w (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.)
Southold, NY 11971
OF SO!/r�o�
� O
o • ao
yC�UNTI
MAILING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1179
Southold,'NY 11971
Telephone: 631 165 -1938
LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
►I TWTA reTRU \FA1i
To: John Bredemeyer, President
Town of Southold Board of Trustees
From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner
LWRP Coordinator
Date: January 20, 2015
Re: Proposed Wetland Permit for BARBARA ADAMS
SCTM# 1000-86-7-9
JAN 2 0 2015
s <
t-
Note- that the Zoning Board of Appeals issued a determination on the action on November 20, 2014.
The decision requires a perpetual 15' wide landscaped buffer.
Patricia C. Moore, Esq. on behalf of BARBARA ADAMS requests a Wetland Permit to demolish
existing dwelling and garage and construct a new 3,198.12sq.ft. two-story, single-family dwelling; a
26.3'x8.3' attached rear seaward deck; and an 18.'5x18.1' front deck. Located: 8100 Indian Neck Lane,
Peconic. SCTM# 86-7-9
The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of
Southold Town Code, and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards.
Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this
department, as well as the records available to me, it is my determination that the proposed action to
construct a single family dwelling (less than the code required setback of 100 feet from the top -of
bluff/bank) is INCONSISTENT with the below listed LWRP polices and therefore INCONSISTENT with
the LWRP.
4.1 ' Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards
A. Minimize potential loss and damage by locating development and structures away from
flooding and erosion hazards.
3. Move existing development and structures as far away from flooding and erosion
hazards as ptactical. Maintaining existing development. and structures in hazard areas
may be warranted for.-
a.
ora
a. structures which functionally require a location on the coast or in coastal
waters.
The structure is a private, single family residence and therefore does not
require a location on the coast.
c. sites where relocation of an existing structure is not practical.
The applicant proposes to demolish an existing single family residence and
construct a single family residence more seaward and closer to the FEMA
Flood Zone VE (velocity hazard) zone than the existing structure. The
existing single family residential structure is located 72' to the top -of -bluff
and the proposed new single family residential construction is proposed at
46' to the top of bluff.
Figure 1 Subject parcel (White Arrow)
The applicant cites several permits that were issued for structures and
gives the distance to the high water mark and concrete walls. It is
important to note that two actions are comparable to the proposal. In 2014
the Board of Trustees issued a permit (8453)'on SCTM# 1000-86-7-8 that
approved the razing of an existing single family dwelling and the
construction of a single family dwelling 75' from the concrete seawall on
the property. The approval required that the dwelling be relocated
landward from the original location of the razed structure.
In 2013 new construction on SCTM#-86-7-6 was also located further
landward than the razed dwelling complying with the 75' setback to the
bulkhead pursuant to Board of Trustee permit 8293.
Since both actions met the 75' setback from the bulkhead the Zoning Board
of Appeals did not review the actions.
Policy 3: Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold.
Many of the important scenic components in the Town of Southold can be viewed from
local roads and from the public parks along the shoreline.
3.1 Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold.
A. Minimize introduction of structural design components (including utility
lines, lighting, signage and fencing) which would be discordant with
existing natural scenic components and character.
D. Use appropriate siting, scales, forms, and materials to ensure that
structures are compatible with and add interest to existing scenic
components.
The proposal to rebuild a large, single family residential structure
more seaward than the existing residential structure could interrupt
the important scenic views from Indian Neck Road south.
In the event that the action is approved, it is recommended that the new, constructed residential
structure be located not further seaward than the existing residential structure to mitigate
damage and loss of structures due to future storms, and not interrupt important scenic views
important to the community.
Further, it is recommended that the following be required:
1. A perpetual 15' wide landscaped buffer pursuant to Zoning Board of Appeals decision (6792).
2. Stormwater controls for the construction of the new structure.
Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written
determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action.
Cc: Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney
FOtekG
Peter Young, Chairman
Lauren Standish, Secretary
Conservation Advisory Council
Town of Southold
Town Hall, 53095 Main Rd.
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Telephone (631) 765-1892
Fax (631) 765-6641
At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., January
14, 2015 the following recommendation was made:
Moved by John Stein, seconded by Peter Meeker, it was
RESOLVED to SUPPORT the application of JAN NICHOLSON AND BARBARA ADAMS
to construct a new two-story single-family dwelling located 75' from bulkhead; attached
rear deck and front deck.
Located: 8100 Indian Neck Lane, Peconic. SCTM#86-7-9
Inspected by: John Stein, Keith McCamy, Doug Hardy
The CAC Supports the application with the Condition a survey is submitted that is certified
by a licensed surveyor, the driveway is permeable, and a drainage plan. The CAC also
questions if the new construction will be on the existing footprint.
Vote of Council: Ayes: All
Motion Carried
JAN 202015
3
pro... � ....:.,�.i'..t ..._'.:.t.::.1 .,..._�.,..
BOARD MEMBERS
Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson
Eric Dantes
Gerard P. Goehringer
George Horning
Kenneth Schneider
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road • P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971-0959
Office Location:
Town Annex /First Floor, Capital One Bank
54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue)
Southold, NY 11971
http://southoldtown.northfork.net
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD----
Tel. (631) 765-1809 • Fax (631)1765-9064
L DEC 1 5 2014
FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION �-- ;
MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 2014 � wd Tcai�n
ZBA FILE: 6792
NAME OF APPLICANT: Barbara Adams and Jan Nicholson (CV)
PROPERTY LOCATION: 8100 Indian Neck Lane (adj. to Hog Neck Bay) Peconic SCTM# 1000-86-7-9
SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this
application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without
further steps under SEQRA.
SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk
County Administrative Code Sections A 1414 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its
reply dated September 10, 2014 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there
appears to be no significant county -wide or inter -community impact.
LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency
review of the- Town ' ofSouthold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy
Standards,, The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated September 26, 2014. Based upon the
information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Fonm.submitted to this department, as well as the
records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is INCONSISTENT. However, the
applicant submitted an amended plan placing the proposed dwelling at a conforming location from the bulkhead.
Additionally, with the conditions placed herein the Board finds the action consistent with the LWRP policy.
PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION.. Subject property is in a R-80 zoned District and contains 33,145 square
feet of which 27,947 sq. ft. is buildable area. It is improved with a one story home and detached storage shed. It
fronts on the western side of Indian Neck Lane at the Beach dead end. The parcel has 122.03 feet on Peconic Bay,
to the south, 324.84 feet on Indian Neck Lane, to the east, 90 feet on the northerly side and 304.63 feet to the west.
This information is taken from a survey from Young and Young Surveyor dated November 1, 2013, last revised
July 21, 2014.
BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article XXII Section 280-116B and Article XXIII
Section 280-124 and Section 280-15(F) and the Building Inspector's May 28, 2014, amended July,; 29, 2014,
amended August 4, 2014 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit for piirtially-demolish
and relocate an existing single family dwelling as an XCWqsitry liuil 3isiAi c:oEFsti tit d it" single family: dwelling
and construct a new accessory garage, at; 1) less than I" from the hillkilc.« , 2)
less than the code required front yard setback of 40 feetr3) ' than tltc, c + c tluireti c :ryard setback of 4,0 feet,
4) accessory building in location other than the front (waterfront) or rear yard, 5) accessory garage,prrposed in a
location other than the front (waterfront) or rear yard.
Page 2 of 3 — November 20, 2014
ZRAN6792 — Adams/Nicholson
SCTM#1000-86-7A
RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variances to 1. Partially demolish and relocate an existing single
family dwelling as an accessory building in the side yard where the code requires a rear yard location and to
construct a new single family dwelling with 2. a bulkhead setback of 50 feet where the code requires 75 feet, 3. a
front yard setback of 29 feet where the code requires 40 feet and 4. a rear yard setback of 16 feet where the code
requires 50 feet. In addition a 5`h variance is requested to construct a new accessory garage with a side yard location
where the code requires a rear yard location. Note that on waterfront properties accessory structures may be located
in the front yard provided they meet the principal front yard setback, which neither accessory is able to do on the
subject property.
AMENDED_ APPLICATION: At the public hearing the applicant was asked to bring plan into more conformity
with the code. On October 29, 2014, the Zoning Board received an amended survey. It shows the proposed new
dwelling at a conforming bulkhead setback of 75 feet, complete demolition and removal of the existing dwelling
(aka Seagyan Club), and construction of one accessory garage. This has eliminated the need for two variances.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The immediate neighborhood is comprised of lots that are of many different
sizes with varying degrees of conformity to the code. This property was the subject of a prior ZBA grant #4406 in
1996 to allow the `as built' location of an accessory shed. Historically, the existing dwelling was once a clubhouse
used by the residents of the area as a membership club. It was known as the Seagyan Club. The club found another
location for the membership and the clubhouse was converted to the residence that is there today. There were many
letters submitted in both support and opposition to the original application.
FINDINGS OF EA
ST/'REASONS-FOR.BOARD ACTION:
The Zoning Board of Appeals held public hearings on this application on October 2, 2014 and November 6, 2014
at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, put'sorisl
inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the
following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings:
1. Town Law 6267-b(3)(b)(1).. - Grant of the relief as amended will not produce an undesirable change in the
character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The conforming bulkhead setback, as amended,
preserves the water views from the street end and the adjacent neighbor's property. The applicant submitted
documentation showing the retention of existing healthy older trees on the property to create privacy from the
street for the proposed new dwelling and to maintain to the greatest extent practicable the wooded look of the
existing property. The amended application includes only one accessory garage which is typical. of the
neighborhood.
2. Town Law 6267-b(3)(6)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible
for the applicant to pursue, other than area variances. The parcel has a very limited building envelope based upon
present code requirements and due to the depth of the parcel the applicant cannot achieve a conforming.front or
rear yard setback for a dwelling or location for an accessory garage.
3. Town Law 6267-b(3)(b)(3). The variances granted herein are mathematically substantial, r �f i - t-fing 28%
relief from the code for the front yard setback, and 68 % relief from the code for the rear yard setback for the
proposed new dwelling. The location of the proposed accessory garage in a side yard is 100% relief;from the code.
However, the dwelling will have a code conforming bulkhead setback and lot coverage and the accessory garage is
proposed in the only practical location on the subject parcel which is among the smallest in the neigl borhood at
33,145 square feet of vvllich 27,947 sq. ft. is buildable area.
4. .Town -.Law 6267-b(3)(b)(4), No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential
community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The
applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code for all buildings proposed
on the site. The amended application removed the inconsistent finding of the LWRP,.
Page 3 of 3 —November 20, 2014
7.BA#6792 — Adams/Nicholson
SCTiV1#1000-86-7-9
5. Town Law 8267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the
Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the
limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase.
6. -Town Law -8267-b., Grant of the relief as amended is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the
applicant to enjoy the benefit of a new single family dwelling and an accessory garage while preserving and
protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community.
RESOLUTION OF. THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under
New York Town aw 267-B, motion was offered by Member Goehringer, seconded by Member Weisman
(Chairperson), and duly carried, to
DENY, the application as applied for, and
GRANT the variance relief as amended and shown on the site plan labeled SKI, prepared by Robert G. Madey,
Architects, dated May 27, 2014, last revised October 7, 2014. And the architectural drawings dated May 27, 2014
labelled SK2 and SK 3. Subject to the following conditions;
CONDITIONS:
1. The accessory garage shall contain only the utility of electric and an outside hose bib.
2. A perpetual 15 foot wide landscaped buffer shall be established landward from the top of bluff. The buffer shall
encompass the existing vegetation. The landscaped buffer shall be staked prior to any construction on site.
That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued.
Any deviation from the survey, site plan andlor architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays
and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and
public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals,
Any deviation from the variance(s) granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey
cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when
involi ing nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future
use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses,
setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action.
The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does
not increase the degree, of nonconformity.
Vote of the Board.' Ayes: Members Weisman (Chairperson), Schneider, Horning, Goehringer, Dantes, This Resolution was
duly adopted (5-0).
Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson
Approved for filing J/
NICHOLSON RESIDENCE
Robert G..Vadey Architects
m—Weu ftp Vey Yoh IIA3
—
.1 --"El MCV SUIJU -T-11 El
p..1 sos�nos
FINAL
FINAL MAP
I
REVIEWED BY ZBA
DECISION
.EE DE!ICTS,
DATED
al� —
cc, 19'-n" SITE PLAN
SKI
- lq")-
James F. King, President
Bob Ghosio, Jr., Vice -President.
Dave Bergen
John Bredemeyer
Michael J. Domino
no
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Office Use Only
oastal Erosion Permit Application
etland Permit Application _ Administrative Permit
_Amendment/Transfe Bx a ion
Received Application: 5
_ Atceived Fee:$
✓ Completed Application
_incomplete.
uSEQRA Classification:
Type I Type11Unlisted
Coordination:(date sent)
-7'LWRP Consistency Asses men Form
L7CAC Referral Sent: .
_VDate of Inspection:
_Receipt of CAC Report: .
Lead Agency Determination:
,Technical Review:
V Public Hearing -Held:
Resolution: .
Name of Applicant Jan Nicholson Barbara Adams
Mailing Address 419 East 50th Street, NY
NY 10022
Phone Number:( ) (631) 765-4330
Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - 86-7-9
Property Location: 81 INDIAN NECK ROAD PECONIC
(provide LILCO Pole #, distance to cross streets, and location)
AGENT: Patricia C. Moore Esq.
(If applicable)
Address: 51.020 Main Road
SOUTHOLD NEW YORK phone: (631)765-4330
Town Hall Annex.
54375 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971-0959
Telephone (631) 765-1892
Fax (631) 765-6641
--1
D EC 1 5 2014
Boardof 'Trus gees Application
GENERAL DATA
Land Area (in square feet): 33,145
R-80
Area Zoning:
Previous use ofproperty: single family dwelling and garage
Intended use of property: new single family dwelling and new garage
Covenants and Restrictions on property? Yes X No
If "Yes". please provide a copy.
Will this project require a Building Permit as per Town Code? X Yes No
If "Yes", be advised this applicationwill be reviewed by the Building Dept. prior to a Board of Trustee review
and Elevation' Plans will be required.
Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals? Yes . X No
If "Yes", please provide copy of decision.
Will this project require any:demolition as per Town Code or as determined by the Building Dept:?
X Yes 'No
Does the structure (s) on property have a valid Certificate of Occupancy? X Yes No
Prior permits/approvals for site improvements:
Agency Date
zoning board
No prior .permits/approvals for site improvements.
Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency?x No Yes
If yes, provide explanation:
Project Description (use attachments if necessary):
new two story single family dwelling located 75' from bulkhead,16' from westerly side
and 29' and 34' from Indian Neck Lane as
approved by the Zoning Board of Appeals (file #6792 dated 11/20/14) 5� e a4a6 tJ
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Nicholson
construction of new two story 3,198.12 square foot single family dwelling; 1 st floor 51' 5 1/4' X
60'3 3/4"; second floor 42'2 3/8" X 60 3 3/4". Attached rear seaward deck is 26.3 X 8.3 and
front deck is 18.5 X 18.1
Said new dwelling located 75 feet from bulkhead, 16' from westerly side; 29' and 34' feet from
Indian Neck Lane
Board of Trustees Application'
WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA
Purpose of the proposed operations:
construct new dwelling at 75' from bulkhead
Area of wetlands on lot: 5% square feet
Percent coverage of lot: 5% %
Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland
edge of wetlands: 100 feet.
Closest distance between nearest proposed structure acid upland
edge of wetlands: 75 feet
Does the project involve exeavation.or filling?
No X Yes
If yes, how much material, will be excavated? foundatigtbic yards
How much.material will be filled? 0 cubic yards
Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: foundation feet
Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: flat
Manner in which material will be removed or deposited:
standard construction equipment
Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by
reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate):
none- all activity landward of bulkead & vegetated bank
J ,
617.20
Appendix B
Short Environmental Assessment Form
Instructions for Completing
Part 1- Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses
become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification.
Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would.be needed to fully
respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information.
Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful
to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item.
Part 1- Project and Sponsor Information
Clot,.
Name of Action or Project:
/V&W ¢
Project Location (describe, and attach a locatio map):
0100 mal t4'n
Brief Description of Proposed Action:
Ill Gl`1��' J ludw jez-,?a7e
Name of Applicant or Sponsor: 'alGytq
Telephone:
Aza-It"�
E -Mail: At 6&r s
Address:
City/PO:
State:
ode:/
1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance,
NO
YES
administrative rule, or regulation?
If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that
may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to'question 2.
2. Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other governmental Agency?
NO
YES
X
If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval:
3.a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? acres
b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? : �' acres
c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned
or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 0 acres
4. Check all land uses that occur on, adjoining and near the proposed action.
❑ Urban ❑ Rural (non -agriculture) ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial )<Residential (suburban)
❑ Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic ❑ Other (specify):
❑ Parkland
Page 1 of 4
I=
5. Js the proposed action,
a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations?
b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan?
NO
YES
N/A
x
X
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural
landscape?
'NO
YES
X
7. Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area?
If Yes, identify: A�aw[. _ '6 at:;(
NO
YES
8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels?
b. Are public transportation service(s) available at or near the site of the proposed action?
c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action?
NO
YES
x
X
9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements?
If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies:
Atr. s. 6- � ��
NO
YES
NO
X
YES
10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply?
If No, describe method for providing potable water:
x
11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities?
If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment:
NO
YES
X
12. a. Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic
Places. ',rreP1r1J_'
b. Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area?
NO
YES
v
13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain
wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency?
b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody?
If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres:
NO
YES
X
x
14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply:
¢f Shoreline ❑ Forest ❑ Agricultural/grasslands ❑ Early mid-successional
PC Wetland ❑ Urban JKSuburban
15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed
by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered?
NO
YES
x
16. Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? l�� ��/A
C' /res
NO
YES
�
17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources?
If Yes,
a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? jSNO ❑ YES
b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)?
If Yes, briefly describe: ❑ NO)(YES
NO
YES
Page 2 of 4
18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of
water or other liquids (e.g. retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)?
If Yes, explain purpose and size:
NO
YES
V
small
to large
19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed
solid waste management facility?
If Yes, describe:
NO
YES
may
may
occur
20. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or
completed) for hazardous waste?
If Yes, describe:
NO
YES
regulations?
2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land?
I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDGE
Applicandsponsor nar.4 Date:
Signature:
Part 2 - Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following
questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or
otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept "Have my
responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?"
Page 3 of 4
No, or
Moderate
small
to large
impact
impact
may
may
occur
occur
1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning
regulations?
2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land?
/
3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community?
4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the
establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)?
5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or
/
affect existing infrastructure for mass transit, biking or walkway?
6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate
/
reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities?
7. Will the proposed action impact existing:
a. public / private water supplies?
b. public / private wastewater treatment utilities?
8. Will the proposed action impair the character- or quality of important historic, archaeological,
/
architectural or aesthetic resources?
9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources (e.g., wetlands,
waterbodies, groundwater, air quality, flora and fauna)?
Page 3 of 4
Part 3 - Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every
question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular
element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3.
Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by
the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact
may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring,
duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and
cumulative impacts.
❑ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation,
that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an
environmental impact statement is required.
❑ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation,
that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
Name ooj Lead Agency TI' -h h
Date
Are
Print or Ty,Ae Name 9 - esponsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer
in fead Agency Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer)
Page 4 of 4
No, or
Moderate
small
to large
impact
impact
may
may
occur
occur
10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion, flooding or drainage
problems?
11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health?
Part 3 - Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every
question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular
element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3.
Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by
the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact
may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring,
duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and
cumulative impacts.
❑ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation,
that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an
environmental impact statement is required.
❑ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation,
that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts.
Name ooj Lead Agency TI' -h h
Date
Are
Print or Ty,Ae Name 9 - esponsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer
in fead Agency Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer)
Page 4 of 4
FORM -6/ d-
Qualified in Suffolk Count�j,��
Commission Expires July 18,1
Town of Southold
you
aE
Erosion, Sedimentation & Storm-Water Run -off ASSESSMENT FORM
PROPERTY LOCATION: S.C.T.M.tY: THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS MAY REQUIRE THE SUBMISSION OF A
STORM-WATER, GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN
�p
str c e3 c(o –Mo V TT— CERTIFIED BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK:
SCOPE OF WORK - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
ITEM # / WORK ASSESSMENT
Yes No
a. What is the Total Area of the Project Parcels?
(Include Total Area of all Parcels located within t f
1 Will this Project Retain All Storm-Water Run -Off
3 3 S
Generated by a Two (2") Inch Rainfall on Site?
the Scope of Work for Proposed Construction) (S.F. /Acres)
(This item will include all run-off created by site
b. What is the Total Area of Land Clearing
clearing and/or construction activities as well as all
and/or Ground Disturbance for the proposed /Q DO v
Site Improvements and the permanent creation of
construction activity?
impervious surfaces.)
(9.F. /Acres)
2 Does the Site Plan and/or Survey Show All Proposed
–
PROVEDE BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION (ProvldeAddlflonalPages asNeeded)
Drainage Structures Indicating Size & Location? This
Item shall Include all Proposed Grade Changes and —
IX2VVL 0 f S -t.N ( 5 –ci a ;70t/ S-f
�%
Slopes Controlling Surface Water Flow.
3 Does the Site Plan and/or Survey describe the erosion
cmd c,,24:6 hl .4 4
!�,'
and sediment control practices that will be used to �(
control site erosion and storm water discharges. This
USC T%5 �1/7)'m . h t'.l.�i4Q ��
item must be maintained throughout the Entire
Construction Period.
C44d 17e&., %Lr/1Cc it
4 Will this Project Require any Land Filling, Grading or
Excavation where there is a change to the Natural
Existing Grade Involving more than 200 Cubic Yards
of Material within any Parcel?
rj Will this Application Require Land Disturbing Activities
Encompassing an Area in Excess of Five Thousand
(5,000 S.F.) Square Feet of Ground Surface? —
6 Is there a Natural Water Course Running through the
Site? Is this Project within the Trustees jurisdiction
or within One Hundred (100') feet of a Wetland or
General DEC SWIPPP Requ6monts;
Submission of a SWPPP Is required for all Construction activities Involving soil
Beach?
disturbances of one (1)or more acres; Including disturbances of less then one acre that
7 Will there be Site preparation on Existing Grade Slopes
are part of a larger common plan that will ultimately disturb one or more acres of land;
which Exceed Fifteen (15) feet of Vertical Rise to �C
Including Construction activities involving soil disturbances of less than one (1) acre where
One Hundred (100') of Horizontal Distance?
the DEC has determined that a SPDES permit Is required for storm water discharges.
(SWPPP's Shall meet the Minimum Requirements of the SPDES General Penult
8 Will Driveways, Parking Areas or other Impervious
for Storm Water Discharges from Construction activity - Permit No. GP-0-10-001.)
Surfaces be Sloped to Direct Storm-Water Run -Off
1. The SWPPP shall be prepared prior to the submittal of the NO). The NOI shall be
into and/or in the direction of a Town right-of-way?
submitted to the Department prior to the commencement of construction activity.
2. The SWPPP shall describe the erosion and sediment control practices and where
9 Will this Project Require the Placement of Material,
required, post-construction storm water management practices that will be used and/or
Removal of Vegetation and/or the Construction of any y(
constructed to reduce the pollutants In storm water discharges and to assure
Item Within the Town Right-of-Way or Road Shoulder — —
compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. In addition, the SWPPP shall
Area? (Th13 Item will NOT Include the Instaltatlon of Driveway Aprons.)
Identify potential sources of pollution which may reasonably be expected to affect the
quality of storm water discharges.
NOTE: If Any Answer to Questions One through Nine is Answered with a Check Mark
3. All SWPPPs that require the post-construction storm water management practice
in a Box and the construction site disturbance is between 5,000 S.F. & 1 Acre In area,
a Storm-water, Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan Is Required by the Town of
component shall be prepared by a qualified Design Professional Licensed In New York
that Is knowledgeable in the principles and practices of Storm Water Management.
Southold and Must be Submitted for Review Prior to Issuance of Any Building Permit.
(NOTE: A Check Mark (.(r) and/or Answer for each Question Is Required fare Complete Appticallon)
SPATE OF NEW YORK, l
COUNTY OF... v ? /..� ................ SS
That I, ....4L..Cawris.(r�Qoo
............... being duly sworn, deposes and says that he/she is the applicant for Permit,
(Meme of-, hdivigningDocumenl)
Andthat he/she is the ..........•...•.............................................................................................................................................
(Own Contractor, Agent, Corporate Of for, eta)
Owner and/or representative of the Owner or Owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to
make and file this application; that all statements contained in this application are true to lite best of his knowledge and belief; and
that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in die application filed herewith.
Sworn to be ore me thi
day of ................. . 2(71
NoC. .......:......................:-BESSY�P�..P.EF�KINS.............:�(:L :.....:...................................NntA.....
IVtMIC State of New York (Signature of Applicant)
FORM -6/ d-
Qualified in Suffolk Count�j,��
Commission Expires July 18,1
3rd of Trustees Applicati
AUTHORIZATION
(where the applicant is not the owner)
BARBARA ADAMS, as owner/seller of premises 8100 Indian Neck Lane, Peconic, New York
(sctm: 1000-86-7-9)
residing at''{p� L44ff& hereby authorize
`PCc_on({ L, /"/,? 1195'9
Patricia C. Moore, to apply for permit(s) and appear before the Southold Board of Town
Trustees on my behalf as seller.
ds" o- �_�a- (Owner's signature)
PATRICIA C. MOORE
Attorney at Law
51020 Main- Road
Southold, New York 11971
Tel: (631) 765-4330
Fax: (631) 765-4643
www.mooregilys.co
s.com
MEMORANDUM
TO: TRUSTEES
FROM: PATRICIA C. MOORE
DATE: January 21, 2015
SUBJECT: ADAMS
Attached please find:
white postal receipts, green card and mailing list
affidavit of mailing
affidavit of posting
r
JAN 2 1 2015
� C
f
ADAMS (NICHOLSON CV)
SCTM: 1000-86-7-9
JONATHAN WENDELL
22 TURNER DRIVE
GREENWICH CT 06831
SCTM: 1000-86-7-7.2
JANET CARRUS
140 E. 28TH ST., APT. PHC
NEW YORK NY 10016
SCTM: 1000-86-6-26.1
FEES:
Postage 0.48
Certified Fee 3.30
Retum Receipt 2.70
Restricted
TOTAL
PO ARIL OR 6E�
0
FEES:
Postage 0.48
Certified Fee 3.30
Retum Receipt 2.70
Restricted
rora� 9191 :., 6.48
RECEIPT
r RECEIPT
1 7104 2438 8090 0000 4288
7104 2438 8090 0000 4271
FROM:
FROM:
Moore Law Office
Moore Law Office
} RE:
j� RE:
I
i
I
i SEND TO:
SEND TO:
I JANET CARRUS
JONATHAN WENDELL
140 E. 28TH ST., APT. PHC
22 TURNER DRIVE
NEW YORK NY 10016
GREENWICH CT 06831
FEES:
Postage 0.48
Certified Fee 3.30
Retum Receipt 2.70
Restricted
TOTAL
PO ARIL OR 6E�
0
FEES:
Postage 0.48
Certified Fee 3.30
Retum Receipt 2.70
Restricted
rora� 9191 :., 6.48
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------x
In the Matter of the Application of AFFIDAVIT
OF
ADAMS
Applicant's Land Identified as
1000-86-7-9
X
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)
STATE OF NEW YORK)
MAILING
I, Betsy Perkins, residing at Mattituck, New York, being duly sworn, depose and
say that:
On the"i day of January, 2015, 1 personally mailed at the United States Post
Office in Southold, New York, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED,
a true copy of the attached Legal Notice in prepaid envelopes addressed to the
neighbors on the attached list.
Attached hereto is the white receipt post -marked by the Southold Post Office on
said date.
Sworn to before me this
da of January, 2015
7(Notary Public)
MARGARET C. RUTKOWSKI
Notary Public, State of New York
No. 4982528
Qualified in Suffolk County�O ys
Commission Expires June 3,
PLEASE list, on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet of paper, the lot numbers next to
the owner names and addresses for which notices were mailed. Thank you.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: NEW YORK
X
In the Matter of the Application of
ADAMS
Regarding Posting of Sign Upon
Applicant's Land Identified as
1000-86-7-9
---------------------------------------------------------------x
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)
STATE OF NEW YORK)
AFFIDAVIT
OF SIGN
POSTING
I, PATRICIA C. MOORE, residing at 370 Terry Lane, Southold, New York 11971
being duly sworn depose and say that:
On the�1 day of January, 2015, 1 personally posted the property known as 1135
Calves Neck Road, Southold, New York by placing the board of Trustees official Poster
where it can easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the post has remained
in place for eight (8) days prior to the date of the public hearing. Date of Hearing to be
held on Wednesday, January 21, 2015 on or about 5:30 p.m.
atricia C. Moore
X
rn to before me this
day of,/1Aj - 2013
BETSY A. PERKINS
Notary Public, State of New York
No. 01 PE6130636
Oualified in Suffolk CoM.2 Commission Expires July 1
11UTIt..t uF Ht�►KINt�
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held by the Southold Town Board of
Trustees at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, concerning this property.
OWNER(S) OF RECORD: BARBARA ADAMS
SUBJECT OF PUBLIC HEARING:
A Wetland Permit to demolish existing dwelling and garage and construct a
new 3,198.12sq.ft. two-story, single-family dwelling; a 26.3'x8.3' attached
rear seaward deck; and an 18.'5x18.1' front deck.
TIME & DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
Wednesday, January 21, 2015 — at or about 5:30P.M.
If you have an interest in this project, you are invited to view the Town file(s) which are
available for inspection prior to the day of the hearing during normal business days between
the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES *TOWN OF SOUTHOLD * (631) 765-1892
and of Trustees Applicata__
AUTHORIZATION
(where the applicant is not the owner)
JAN NICHOLSON, as contract vendee of premises 8100 Indian Neck Lane, Peconic, (sctm:
1000-86-7-7.2)
residing at 419 East 50' St., New York do hereby authorize my attorney,
Patricia C. Moore, to apply for permit(s) and appear before the Southold Board of Town
Trustees on my behalf.
I. Da -
(OA's signature)
rd of Trustees Application
County of Suffolk
State of New York
BARBARA ADAMS, BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT
HE/SHE IS THE OWNER/SELLER/ FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND
THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF
HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN
THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED
BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO
HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND
FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY
VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION,
I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR
REPRESENTATIVES (S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE
PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION.
Barbara Adams
Sworn to before me this'gA0
day ow 1 , 2014
Notary
1y
rd of Trustees Application
County of Suffolk
State of New York
JAN NICHOLSON BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE
IS THE CONTRACT VENDEE/APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED
PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO
THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL
BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE
APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT
AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES
HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING
UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS
APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR
REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE
PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION.
F �J �-
Jan Ni Tolson
Sworn to before me this
0`8' day of APPI ( , 2014
E
Notary Public
Christine A Clancy
Notary No.101 CL6115367 w York
Qualified in Bronx County
Commission Expires March 14, 20,
APPLICANT
TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM
(FOR SUBMISSION BY OWNER and OWNER'S AGENT)
The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of Town officers and employees. The
purpose of this form is to provide information, which can alert the Town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to
take whatever action is neeessary to avoid same.
YOUR NAME: ADAM, BARBARA, AS OWNER/SELLER AND MOORE, PATRICIA
(Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name
of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the
other person or company name.)
NATURE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.)
Tax Grievance
Variance X
Special Exception
If "Other', .
name the activity:
Change of Zone
Approval of Plat
Exemption from Plat
or Official Map_
Other Trustees
Do you personally, (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or
employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business
interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the Town officer or employee has even a partial
ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the Town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the
shares.
YES NO—X
Complete the balance of this form and date and sign below where indicated.
Name of person employed by the Town of Southold:
Title or position of that person:
Describe that relationship between yourself (the applicant) and the Town officer or employee. Either check the
appropriate line A through D (below) and/or describe the relationship in the space provided.
The Town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply):
A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock
of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation);
B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non -corporate entity
(when the applicant is not a corporation);
C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or
D) the actual applicant.
DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP
Submitted this k day of oee� a2 o/,/,/
Barbara Adams
],cia C. Moore
APPLICANT
TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM
(FOR SUBMISSION BY OWNER and OWNER'S AGENT)
The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of Town officers and employees. The
purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the Town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to
take whatever action is necessary to avoid same.
YOUR NAME: NICHOLSON. JAN AS CONTRACT VENDEE AND MOORE, PATRICIA
(Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name
of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the
other person or company name.)
NATURE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.)
Tax Grievance
Variance
Special Exception
If "Other",
name the activity:
Change of Zone
Approval of Plat
Exemption from Plat
or Official Map
Other Trustees
X
Do you personally, (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or
employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. `Business
interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the Town officer or employee has even a partial
ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the Town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the
shares.
YES NO_X
Complete the balance of this form and date and sign below where indicated.
Name of person employed by the Town of Southold:
Title or position of that person:
Describe that relationship between yourself (the applicant) and the Town officer or employee. Either check the
appropriate line A through D (below) and/or describe the relationship in the space provided.
The Town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent,'or child is (check all that apply):
A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock
of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation);
B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non -corporate entity
(when the applicant is not a corporation);
C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or
D) the actual applicant.
DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP
Submitted this -Ji day of (' l
i
Jan Ni holson Christine A Clancy
Notary PubState of Ne
No. i01 CL6115367 w York
ualitied in Bronx County
Commission Expires March 14,20-1
ricia C. Moore
Town of Southold
LWRP CONSISTENCY. ASSESSMENT FORM
A. INSTRUCTIONS
L All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for
proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This
assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in
making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits
and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area.
2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt
minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local
Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated. as to its significant
3: If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will
affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency
review law. 'Thus, cacti'answwer must be.eXpl ined;in Adin ,;listing.b th sutanortiai ,stud non-
suuRortine facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and
conditions, it shall not be undertaken.
A copy of the LWRP is available in the following p
website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of
local libraries and the Town Clerk's office.
B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION
c� SouVio!d Town
SCTM#
PROJECT NAME 141 0—e�h All CA o 16C>11) G'B r 11P�t
The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response):
PKX
Town Board ❑ Planning Board ❑ Building Dept. ❑ Board of Trustees
1. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response):
(a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital Ell
•construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction)
(b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy)
(c) Permit, approval, license, certification:
Nature and extent of action:
01J
all ,
Location of action: (F/W 0
Site acreage: G/000
Present land use: /e e �c%idea lJ�'ur, < E SLieG/
Present zoning classification:
2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following
information shall be provided:
(a) Name of applicant: :cJc� ira /a�yJ s �$ (� J -an
(b) Mailing address: 7 L
(c) Telephone number: Area Code () ��* MOp1e
(d) Application number, if any:
Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency?
Yes ❑ 'No VMI If yes, which state or federal agency?
DEVELOPED COAST POLICY
Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character,
preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and
minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Page 2 for evaluation
criteria.
® Yes ❑ No [] Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See
LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria
VPc 11 Na ❑ Nnt AnnlirahlP
Location of action: -:Wd (o--o 6VQCkO Zo-^�
Site acreage;..-
Present
creage;,
Present land use: 1�-* 5
%4
Present zoning classification;
2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following
information shall be provided:
n
(a) Name of applicant: /l�Gfia�A 1'l�'i% S �� h kt CAO lSC5n��
(b) Mailing address: �—/V 7at OOAe ei/ OZO _ Ma (Y), .
�6z�0_ld _/'-Y 119"71
(c) Telephone number: Area Code _ - 0
(d) Application number, if .any: -
Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency?
Yes ❑ No, l K If yes, which state or federal Agency?�
C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or
not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy.
Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion.
DEVELOPED COAST POLICY
Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character,
preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and
minimizes. adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation
criteria.
Yes ❑. No ❑ Not Applicable
vUSe hP �D ��� 006 76-1
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See
LWRP S ction III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria
7Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary "
Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See
LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria
Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
NATURAL COAST POLICIES
Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP
Section HI — Policies Pages S through 16 for evaluation criteria
.5
Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy S. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of .Southold. See LWRP Section III
— Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria
Yes C] No P Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including
Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages. 22
through 32 for evaluation criteria.
Yes No XNot Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies
Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria.
'❑
Yes No'N. Not 0 � Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous
substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria.
11 Yes 1. No M Not Applicable
PUBLIC COAST POLICIES
Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public
resources of the. Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation
criteria.
Q Ye�j No H Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
WORKING COAST POLICIES
Policy 10. Protect Southold's water -dependent uses and promote siting of new water -dependent uses in
suitable locations. See LWRP Section III •— Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria.
Q Yes 0; No IN Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic
Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria.
❑ Yes 0;, No � Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages
62 through 65 for evaluation criteria.
YesEl No K Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP
Section III -- Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria.
F] Yes F0 No Not Applicable
PREPARED B TITLE DATE 1,74-10
i'
APR 2 1 2015
i
;u-Wn
h, =rid of
1622
1i27 -I
p17 F�
A
WELL
WELL TO BE ABANDONED
1
1
1
1
I
I
�0' I
I
I
1
_ ani 1
\\\ NOTES
1
JAN NICHOLSON
\
\ TOTAL AREA
\\
= 31,1115 SF
AREA SEAWARD OF CONCRETE SEAWALL
= 3,166 SF
\ BUIDABLE LAND
= 28,1441 5F
\ PROPOSED HOUSE b DECK
\\
= 3,1141 SF
PROPOSED GARAGE
= 126 5F
\ PROPOSED TOTAL STRUCTURES
= 3,845 5F
MAP PREPARED
NOV. OI, 2013
'LOT COVERAGE = 3,845 SF / 28,1441 5F = 15.66%
RECORD OF REVISIONS
1
AMENDED BULKHEAD LABEL
1
INDICATED FIRM ZONE DATA
F400D INSURANCE RATE MAP PANEL NO. 3610360164 H LAST
D TED SEPT. 25,200q.
I
I
I
I
JUL. 21, 2014
i
I
I
I
EXIST. SANITARY 5'i'5TEM TO BE
FEB. 18, 2015
ABANDONED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5UFF.
FEB. 20, 2015
00. DEPT. OF HEAT RH STANDARDS.
40P
1
41t
J
a'
�R/So
80
, -PROPOSED SANITARY SYSTEM
l
:o•ii
\ _ 'IJP. ^vf
F RUN-OFF ��,9•
\\ PROPOSED ROO0
\\ DRYWELLS ° I` ?�6
/ o
�6o O
a6 >`����
(
\ a9
\ EXISTING HOUSE, SHED 69
Z DRIVEWAY TO BE—/
\ DEMOLISHED 4 REMOVED
i -183"1
r
78
\
0�\h� /
1' d
T
f
400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, Naw York IIg01
tel. 631.121.2303 fax. 631.121.0144
admin®youngenglneering.com
411-q 14 yowtt
Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor
Thomas G. Wolpert, Professional Engineer
Douglas E. Adams, Professional Engineer
Robert G. Tast, Architect
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION
• WE HEREBY CERTIFY TO JAN N 10 H ❑ LS
SURVEY WA5 PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE T. 0 \
PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYS ADOPTED. . . IFN A�p�
ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SI Q 5�n 6`V . tP; +:
�rw4tx_d�
HOWARD A. YOUNG, N.Y.S. L.S. NO. 45811
PLOTTED BY: Diana Lopez
3
�"
PLOT DATE Apr 21, 2015 - 1:35pm
,
"PROPOSED NON -TURF BUFFER"
(existing nat7i vegetation to remain)®
oo
PROJECT LIMITING FENCE 8
STAKED HAYBALES ALONG
-pPROPOSED LIMIT OF CLESNG,
16RA0ING d GROUND /
DISTURBANCE
04 il o 'c +
12.
Q 13.8' 77 � O,�4r/ ®v
6 ®® '�.��✓
•y0
12.11
r:;vn � 6Jp�f
,o•nr i `, FYU%
�\ 0.82® �,. / �y� 9 � . �A� �•
1,3 P".p® "�•r� _ •420 %'9.b6
0.
FIRM ZONE BOUNDARY LINE
AS SCALED FROM FLOOD CBRS AREA
INSURANCE RATE MAP E AB I H
ST L 5 ED 11/01/111110
a
a
ID = MONUMENT SET ■ = MONUMENT FOUND A = STAKE SET A = STAKE FOUND DI - DRAINAGE INLET
SURVEY FOR
`DROVE®Y,V r`
JAN NICHOLSON
DOF 1-tUSTEE
SOF:
. h�
77
County Tax Map District 1000 Section SFJ Block
01 Lot 01
:F
w f \
FIELD SURVEY COMPLETED
OCT. 30, 2013
400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, Naw York IIg01
tel. 631.121.2303 fax. 631.121.0144
admin®youngenglneering.com
411-q 14 yowtt
Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor
Thomas G. Wolpert, Professional Engineer
Douglas E. Adams, Professional Engineer
Robert G. Tast, Architect
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION
• WE HEREBY CERTIFY TO JAN N 10 H ❑ LS
SURVEY WA5 PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE T. 0 \
PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYS ADOPTED. . . IFN A�p�
ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SI Q 5�n 6`V . tP; +:
�rw4tx_d�
HOWARD A. YOUNG, N.Y.S. L.S. NO. 45811
PLOTTED BY: Diana Lopez
3
�"
PLOT DATE Apr 21, 2015 - 1:35pm
,
"PROPOSED NON -TURF BUFFER"
(existing nat7i vegetation to remain)®
oo
PROJECT LIMITING FENCE 8
STAKED HAYBALES ALONG
-pPROPOSED LIMIT OF CLESNG,
16RA0ING d GROUND /
DISTURBANCE
04 il o 'c +
12.
Q 13.8' 77 � O,�4r/ ®v
6 ®® '�.��✓
•y0
12.11
r:;vn � 6Jp�f
,o•nr i `, FYU%
�\ 0.82® �,. / �y� 9 � . �A� �•
1,3 P".p® "�•r� _ •420 %'9.b6
0.
FIRM ZONE BOUNDARY LINE
AS SCALED FROM FLOOD CBRS AREA
INSURANCE RATE MAP E AB I H
ST L 5 ED 11/01/111110
a
a
ID = MONUMENT SET ■ = MONUMENT FOUND A = STAKE SET A = STAKE FOUND DI - DRAINAGE INLET
SURVEY FOR
JAN NICHOLSON
at Feconfc, Town of Southold
Suffolk County, New York
BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY
County Tax Map District 1000 Section SFJ Block
01 Lot 01
FIELD SURVEY COMPLETED
OCT. 30, 2013
MAP PREPARED
NOV. OI, 2013
Record of Revisions
RECORD OF REVISIONS
DATE
AMENDED BULKHEAD LABEL
NOV. 15. 2013
INDICATED FIRM ZONE DATA
NOV. 21, 2013
GENERAL
JUL. 21, 2014
HIGH WATER MARK
FEB. 18, 2015
BLUFF/BANK
FEB. 20, 2015
BLDG. PERMIT NEW HOUSE ETC...
APR. 14, 2015
AMEND BLDG. PERMIT DATA
APR. 21, 2015
40 O 20 40
80
Scale: I" = 40'
JOB NO. 2013-0211
DW6. 2013_0211_bp
I OF I
DWG FILE: R:\2013\2013_0211\dwg\2013_0211_bp.dwg
NOTES
AREA = 51,5115 50. FT.
• SEE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP PANEL NO. 3610360164 H
LAST DATED SEPT. 25,200q.
V,22I-727+
mot
16.05
16.7
16.02+ /
FRAME o 149' /
Ibb3+ SHED N / .
+16.99
16.25 / f
+15.99
N
+14.-76'
.14.01
`7.1 t:.: . �:✓ _ lts7
MAR 1 0 2015 1;;.
1F5b6 �
.0Olt
�\
X410
.05
� FIRM ZONE BOUNDARY LINE `
6� 14 AS SCALED FROM FLOOD CBRS AREA
INSURANCE RATE MAP ESTABLISHED II/OI/1-190
•
400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901
tel. 631.129.2303 fax. 631.129.0144
adminoyoungengineering.com
Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor
Thomas G. Wolpert, Professional Engineer
Douglas E. Adams, Professional Engineer
Robert 0. Tast, Architect
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION
' WE HEREBY CERTIFY TO JAN N I C H O L S D I* HIS .
SURVEY WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WI \OL9��
PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYS ADOPTED W R
ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL LAID 5U 1411
.4'rV'4t'l - I' -
HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. .. NO.
PLOTTED BY: Diana Lopez
tt�»
PLOT DATE Feb 20, 2015 — 11:03am
17 = MONUMENT SET ■ = MONUMENT FOUND A = STAKE SET ®= STAKE FOUND DI - DRAINAGE INLET
SURVEY FOR
JAN NICHOLSON
at Feconic, Town of Southold
Suffolk County, New York
I BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY I
County Tax Map District 1000 Section 56 Black 01 Lac 051
FIELD SURVEY COMPLETED
MAP PREPARED
Record of Revisions
OCT. 30, 2013
NOV. 01, 2013
RECORD OF REVISIONS DATE
AMENDED BULKHEAD LABEL NOV. 15, 2018
INDICATED FIRM ZONE DATA NOV. 21. 2013
GENERAL JUL, 21,201
HIGH WATER MARK FEB. 18. 2015
BLUFF/BANK FEB. 20,201
40 0 20 40 60
Scale: I" = 40'
JOB NO. 2013-0211
DWG. 2013_0211 .bp
DWG FILE R:\2013\20130211\dwg\20130211bp.dwg
L:, un L,, :n . �,�, � ., --'...—
INDICATED HEREON SHALL RON ONLY TO THE PERSON FOR WHOM ME SURVEY IS PREPARED AND ON CHISL BEHALF TO MEcDTLE COMPANY, GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY AND LENDING INSTITUTION LISTED HEREON, AND TO THE ASS"EES OF THE LENDING INSTITUTION, CERTIFICATIONS ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE TO ADDIDONAL INSTITUTIONS OR cSUBSEQUENT OWNERS. (5) THE LOCATION OF WELLS (W), SEPTICVTANKS (ST) & CESSPOOLS (CP) SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM FEND OBSERVATIONS AND OR DATA OBTAINED MM OTHERS.
r
i
lip
sr
p
✓.: i
�. � _ moi. ,. ♦ -\ % '
' \ 141
E
_ C
s
/ \
11
6
,
i
Y,
/ .:' „r, , " \ `' ✓ •fir - '\ r ; - ..i- _: '' rr .. ,r1 '
\ \ pm aur ► t \Ile
s / / \ \ ' / Y �f ✓ A s " , 'e.
owr
Y
r
r -
jk '
r r r
r �N�\
- �� \ n A,
I At
3 a�
L�
�p
Vp
)Ifs ' •r �"� < � ".:. f j t� °. mak, : his+ ,
� J 4� �j1
1
1
A.
cop,
\
S
- \ .(�'+\ ,", ,�. 4 ,,.i- tet., .a f - '� \ r _— -- � A" �;:• �' � . ,,�''%`,p, s� ! - \,►
,
r
\ ,.«" f rs-.''r �'w +ti•.: \ ,r � .jr� \�,e� IIII �" ~-�✓d"
w
i
\ ar,, „r �. .\ ,,� ,�� • � �� ,Alt
1.q/
� \ � !ice , ..+„ `�� �" \ 7.,' \ • \ r ` ` tr \ k *, ✓y 1 � ; " �, � �� �:
'o, t.01
\*,e
+' \
cAp
41
y ,
t
r" s
,
eF
�r
a_ i I' A
r. y
a -
41
cp
Nw-
4
Vv
\ \ !' \
i \ \
0o AV
O�
\ s
t
:.
_MOAll
4C7
\ „ \ dam, ��\
x '
Ak
:
O V
\
1 ., s 0 • ' � .•�� f �A a �F . `\ ��� S,, 1 '
a. 7
:
N
0
oAlk
/ / \ ,2" 41. o NOTE: HOUSE
HAS BEEN RAZED.
o � r¢ � � v
Jewg i
x ,
410
_ _ G
�•
>t \ 41p t \
ip
A In
E
Aa,
o '6,
N I CHOLSON FARCEL
00 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11401
tel. 631.727.2303 fax. 631.-72-7.0144
admin®youngengineering.com
Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor
Thomas G. Wolpert, Professional Engineer
Douglas E. Adams, Professional Engineer
Robert G. Tast, Architect
LEGEND
HWM = HIGH RATER MARK
HSE = HOUSE
BULK = BULKHEAD
DECK = DECK
ROF = ROOF
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION
• I HEREBY GERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UTILIZING
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY $ GONVENTION SURVEYING TEGHNIQUES. THE
APPROXIMATE HIGH WATER MARK, BULKHEADS, DECKS d HOUSES
WHERE DIMENSIONS ARE SET FORTH WERE LOGATED BY US USING
GONVENTIONAL SURVEYING TEGHNIQUES.
C NEW
HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. L.S. NO. 45843 l �✓�
LA
Record of Revisions
RECORD OF REVISIONS DATE
GENERAL JUL. 21, 2014
50 0 25 50 100 150
Scale: I" = 50'
JOB NO. 2013-0211
DWG. 2013. 0211surveybluff—black I OF I
SURVEY
FOR
JAN N I CHOLSON
at Per-onic, Town
of Southold
Suffolk County,
New York
BAYFRONT
SURVEY
County Tax
Map ( ,,(Ii,( 1000 ,echo
n 86 Block 07
Lot G
MAP PREPARED
JUL. 10, 2014
Record of Revisions
RECORD OF REVISIONS DATE
GENERAL JUL. 21, 2014
50 0 25 50 100 150
Scale: I" = 50'
JOB NO. 2013-0211
DWG. 2013. 0211surveybluff—black I OF I