Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-40.-1-20.2OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY 11971 OF SOUj�o� MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM _To: _.__._.Leslie- Weisman, Chair Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals - From: 'Mark Terry, Principal Planner ; LWRP Coordinator Date: March 24, 2014 Re: Coastal Consistency Review for ZBA File Ref KENNETH and JOANN ZAHLER #6851 SCTM#1000-40-1-20.2 KENNETH and JOANN ZAHLER #6851 - Request for Variance from Article XXII Section 280-10503 the Building Inspector's January 5, 2015 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit to construct deer fence, at; 1) deer fence proposed in location other than side and rear yard, located at: 63735 County Route 48 (aka North.Road) (adj. to Long Island Sound) Greenport, NY. SCTM#1000-40-1-20.2 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records: available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed actions are CONSISTENT with the LWRP policies and therefore CONSISTENT with the LWRP. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Stephen Kiely, Assistant Town Attorney BOARD MEMBERS Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Eric Dantes Gerard P. Goehringer George Horning Kenneth Schneider http://southoldtown.northfork.net Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road • P.O. Box 1.179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex /First Floor, Capital One Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS • TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 • Fax (631) 765-9064 February 25, 2015 Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Southold, NY 11971 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. #6851 - Zahler Dear Mr. Terry: D E C E 0 WT FEB 2 5 2015 Southold Town Planning Board We have received an application for construction of deer fence in front yard in Greenport. A copy of the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval under Chapter 280 (Zoning Code), and survey map, project description form, are attached for your reference. Your written evaluation with recommendations for this proposal, as required under the Code procedures of LWRP Section 268-5D is requested within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman. Chairpersons By:(:;�i� - Encls. FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL TO: Kenneth Zahler 63735 Rt. 48 Greenport, NY 11944 DATE: January 5, 2015 Please take notice that your application dated December 17, 2014 For a permit for a deer fence in the front yard at Location of property: 63735 Rt. 48, Greenport, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 40 Block 1 Lot 20.2 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed front yard deer fence is not permitted pursuant to Article III, 280-105 which states: II -C-3. Deer fencing is prohibited in or along the front yard of any property. Authorized Signature TOWN ®f SOUTHOLD OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR Town Hall Annex Receipt No.- 86123 Southold, New York 11971 Date l a - / t / 1 OODollars For U Fee For Fee for Fee For Fee For Certificate ❑ Sign ❑ Flood Development Pmt. ❑ Building Permit ❑ of Occupancy ❑ Cash ❑ ChecPN $ 50 , 0 �:) C:5 Building Department Fee for Electrical ❑ Inspection APPLICATION AND ALL REQUIRED FORMS FOR SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Fee: $ Filed By: Assignment No. APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS AREA VARIANCE House No. Street f, ?� �40" Hamlet SCTM 1000 Section Block 1 Lot(s) f Lot Size 2,r ,,- Zone I (WE) APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED=,,$_� BASED ON SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED—/� Owner(s): Mailing Address: ";Ir e-� `� 7 l 7-� 3/ Telephone• l — Fax: �Uq _f%2157p Email: /`C�� �,�'�� ���•!� NOTE: In addition to the above please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney, agent, architect, builder, contract vendee, etc. and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative: Address: for ( ) Owner ( )Other: Telephone:. Fax: Email: Please check to specify who you wish correspondence,to be mailed to, from the above names: /pplicant/Owner(s), ( ) Authorized Representative, ( ) Other Name/ Address below: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED l —/ _/ V and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED—/ ( ) Building Permit O Certificate of Occupancy O Pre -Certificate of Occupancy () Change of Use () Permit for As -Built Construction O Other - Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article, Section; Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by num . Do not quote the code.) Article: Section: O Subsection: Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. { ) A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law- Section 280-A. ( ) Interpretation of the Town Code, Article Section ( ) Reversal or Other A prior appeal �0 has, ( ) has not been made at any time with respect to this property, UNDER Appeal No(s): 4q6 V Year(s). 4 -co/ (Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our office for assistance) Name of Owner: ZBA File# 4�_ d -O SCJ. Name of Owner: ZBA File# REASONS FOR APPEAL (Please be specific, additional sheets may be used with preparer's signature notarized): 1. An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighbor or a detriment to nearby properties if granted, because: TWO—L ��i��� .�� s'4 . 7 2. The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variancebecause- 14'-X111 4,w/. 3. The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: 4. The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: 4-7 5. Has the alleged difficulty been self created? { } Yes, or &No Why: Are there any Covenants or Restrictions concerning this land? Cho { } Yes (please furnish a copy) This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. v {{ Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent tt C (Agent must submit written Authorization from Owner) Sw onbefore,{e this I day of 120_1 JAMES WMANIVION NOTARY PUBLIC, State of Neva York Suffolk County Reg. No. 4991 Notary Pubic Comm. expires Feb. 10, 20 APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION APPLICANT: �,942'.Z /s% /'62- Z-"011�ATE PREPARED: 1. For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed: k O fV II. New Construction Areas (New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Dimensions of first floor extension: Dimensions of new second floor: Dimensions of floor above second level: Height (from finished ground to top of ridge): Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed? If natural existing grade to first floor: provide height (above ground) measured from M. Proposed Construction Description (Alterations or Structural hanges) (Attach extra sheet if necessary). Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: IV: Calculations of building areas and lot coverage (from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: Proposed increase of building coverage: Square footage of your lot: Percentage of coverage of your lot by buil ing-�area( V. Purpose of New Construction: C--O— //JZ7 ..Q_ //J4 G/ ' �- U'� /'Y' %` VI. Please describe the land contours (flat, slope %, heavily wooded, marsh area, etc.) on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting a code requirement (s): C G r Please submit 8 sets of photos, labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction, and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 4/2012 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? Yes V No B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? No Yes please explain on attached sheet. n C. 1.) Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? 'J 2.) Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with thi application? 3.) Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland bui ng area? yl 4.) If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? X4,11 Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with. the Trustees: 07 and if issued, please attach copies of permit with conditions and *roved surv� . zb D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? Y-7 14 E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting?Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above line. F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Isuilding Department and please describe: ,e;2.e 1,j/ ,�`�``-'C-- G. Please attach all pre -certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If any are lacking, please apply to the Building Department to either obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel?__,�� If yes, please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel and the proposed use (ex: exis(ng single f , proposed: same with garage, pool or other) AUthorrized signature and Date l( AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WHEN TO USE THIS FORM: This form must be completed by the applicant for any special use permit, site plan approval, use variance, area variance or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district OR within 500 feet of a farm operation located in air agricultural district. All applications requiring an agricultural data statement must be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance with Section 239m and 239n of the General Municipal Law. 1. Name of Applicant: /- 1.4 " -�� 2. -YAddress of Applicant: e55 r- _z 3. Name of Land Owner (if oth r than Applicant): 4. Address of Land Owner: 5. Description of ropos d Project: 6. Location of Property: (road and .Tax maps number) °Gjl 7. Is the parcel within 500 feet of a farm operation? { } Yes No 8. Is this.parcel actively farmed? { ) Yes xNo 9. Name and addresses of any owner(s) of land within the agricultural district containing active farm operations. Suffolk County Tax Lot numbers will be provided to you by the Zoning Board Staff, it is your responsibility to obtain the current names and mailing addresses from the Town Assessor's Office (765-1937) or from the Real Property Tax Office located in Riverhead. NAME and ADDRESS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (Please use the back of this page if there are additional property owners) ::�- P -44J Si nature of Applicant g pp Date Note: 1. The local Board will solicit comments from the owners of land identified above in order to consider the effect of the proposed action on their farm operation. Solicitations will be made by supplying a copy of this statement. 2. Comments returned to the local Board will be taken into consideration as part as the overall review of this application. 3. Copies of the completed Agricultural Data Statement shall be sent by applicant to the property owners identified above. The cost for mailing shall be paid by the Applicant at the time the application is submitted for review. 617.20, Appendix B Short Environmental Assessment Form Instructions for Completing Part I - Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part I. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part L You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part I - Project and Sponsor Information Name ofA tion or Project: 7 z��r `v__0�7 < 4e - Project Location (describe, and attach a location map): Brief Description of Proposed Action: / '3-/. y Nam�of pplicant or Sponsor: Telephone: - —C/,,_,7 3 E -Mail: Address: Com, J City/PO: State: Zip Code: 1. Does the proposed action on]3CiXolve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinkice, NO YES administrative rule, or regulation? If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? M YES If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval: 3:a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? Z_,- / L. acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? /Z eW e acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 2 � 7 <— acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on, adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑ Urban ❑ Rural (non -agriculture) ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial XResidential (suburban) ❑ Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic ❑ Other (specify): ❑ Parkland Pagel of 4 5. Is the proposed action, a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? NO YES I _4 %� 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? NO YES 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes, identify: NO YES 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? b. Are public transportation service(s) available at or near the site of the proposed action? c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? NO YES 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: NO YES 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? If No, describe method for providing potable water: NO YES e' r 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: NO YES 12. a. Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic Places? b. Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? NO YES 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency? b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: YES �- 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: [$`Shoreline ❑ Forest ❑ Agricultural/grasslands ❑ Early mid -successional ❑ Wetland ❑ Urban fa Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? NO YES 16. Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non -point sources? If Yes, a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? �P0 ❑ YES b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)? If Yes, briefly des ibe: /� ❑ NO ❑ YES Ary NO YES , Page 2 of 4 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities thatxesult in the impoundment of water or other liquids (e.g. retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)? If Yes, explain purpose and size: NO YES small to large • . • .. _ _ ....,..t impac impact may 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste management facility? If Yes, describe: NO YES occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 20. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: NO YES establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE --7 Applicant/sponsor name: ! (moi ,% Date: Signature: / Part 2 - Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following C questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part l and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept "Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" Page 3 of 4 No, or Moderate small to large • . • .. _ _ ....,..t impac impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit, biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a. public / private water supplies? b. public / private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic, archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources (e.g., wetlands, waterbodies, groundwater, air quality, flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 t A. Part 3 - Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and cumulative impacts. ❑ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. ❑ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 No, or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion, flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? I r Part 3 - Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and cumulative impacts. ❑ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. ❑ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 APPLICANT/OWNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME : 1240 (Last name,first name, Addle initial, unless you are applying in the name of -someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other (activity) Planning Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the _Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO !� If No, sign and date below. If YES, complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicant/agent/representative) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D),and/or describe in the space -provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply) : A)the owner..of greater that�5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation) B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non -corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation) C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or D) the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this. day of_ 1, 20 Signature Print Name�14� ' Z/t'//pl--t Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown. northfork. net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response):. Town Board 0 Planning Dept. N Building Dept. [f] Board of Trustees El 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: Location of action: Site acreage: Present land use: Present zoning classification:. (�d 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: (b) Mailing address: 6 �= C-/ 4Z 111164�L/f (c) Telephone number: Area Code (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No El If yes, which state or federal agency? DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. KlYes ❑ No ❑ (Not Applicable - please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No K(Not Applicable — please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria YeswE No [:] (Not Applicable — please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes 0 No K(Not Applicable — please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria Yes 0 No (Not Applicable — please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. FdYes E No P (Not Applicable — please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. See Section III — Policies Pages; 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No X(Not Applicable — please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and, hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No X(Not Applicable — please explain) PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Ye❑ No&(Not Applicable — please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water -dependent uses and promote siting of new water -dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No rK (Not Applicable — please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No � Not Applicable — please explain Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies;Pages 62 through 65 forevaluation criteria. D Yes EJ N6�Not Applicable- please explain Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section IH,— Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No471 Not Applicable — please explain APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS++` Southold Town all Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman ��� �y .53095 Main.Road James Dinizio, Jr.. _ - P.O. Box 1179 Lydia A. Tortora COD, Southold, New York 11971-0959 Lora S. Collins O ' d► „. _ : 'ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 George Horning y�� Telephone (63:1)'765-1809 BOARD` OF APPEALS -TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND.DETERMINATION MEETING•OF JOLY 19 -2001 ` Apel, No 4968 'EDGEWATER:Jli.LLC Parcel No.1.000-40-1-20.2 STF2EET.S CLQ X ION ..:03735 C' R:: 8; Greenport ..'DATE -017 PUBLIC HEARIN July 1'2, 2001I" FINDINGS OF FACT PROPERTY` FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's. property Is .8 vacant lot. in .Greenport with frontage of 128 feet ars° the iVorth. Road: acid 150 feet :on the Long 1slant� Soand, with depths of 977 fleet {east)F tinct 919 fe�f -(west) The:appr9mmate of sta,nce from tYte Norfh l cad property line to the top of the Sound'Bluff is 810 feet (ease and 725 feet (west) BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Iris.pector's May. 1, 2001 .Notice..of ©isapproval,.,denying a permit to build anew srngle-family dwellirig.beca°°use the proposed ho�ise: (1)'has.a: third. sto:ry,.in 6i6tion 4 the.2 '1.12 story.fimit:in Code Section 100-32, and (2) has an elevator shaft higher than the 35=foot;Hmit in Cone. Secti:on.100-32: AREA VARIANCE.RE1:lEF REQUESTED: AppH6bnt requests a.vadance authorizing construction r of amily :loiae: �wiih upperfloor area shown on architectural plans dated 1:prepared . by Ira Haspel Arc. ect, P -L', (Jab ref..20210.1:)]. F2EaSONS FOR- BOARD -ACTION: DESGRIBED BELOW: On. the basis:of testimony presented, materaaEs subrtiittet and.personal inspection; the t3oard makes the following findings 1The::& hitectural.:plars show a.third-floor bedroom suite of 990. sq. ft.. The ground floor footprint is4357.sq A. and the sec drid floor covers 2415 sq:: ft. Applicant states that the third floor wa$ designed to, comply with th+e.Code definitionnof a half story., but presented no measurements to upp sort -.that statement: - The Board will `treat the matter of the third story as a request `for a variance. .2:. The proposbd%house,h 's an irregular roofline made up.of various sloping elements with nunierotis.:angles As. read!to m:the=pIans,.the makirnurn roof- height is about V-1/2 feet while the average frojn eaves to, peak is ,about 32 feet; within the' 35=fool limit;of the Code.: The:aquare footage of. the third flaor'bedroom suite is. Less: than 25 percent of the ground -floor footprint; and- the presence of the third.flobr does not affect the compliance of the ro'ofiine with the15-fobt,flmit.: .3: The -proposed hawse has -a large chimney that appoar; zJrorr :the plans, -46- be iba ut41- 1l2'feet;high. , Chlmrieys'h height of theelevatoigher.tnan 35 feet are permitted by Code section 100-230(E3)(1]. The . P shaft isequal to the highest roof peak, and severab.feet lower:than the chimney. `-Elevation drawings: show the. chimney as a prominent feature while'.the top: of the elevatorshaft is a' less prominent- element of the irregular roofline. Page 2 - July 19, 2001 ZBA Appl. No. 4968 — Edgewater H, LLC ` Parcel 100040-1-20.2 at Greenport 4: The. prmposed4.Qusq is se# baak ab0-ut,500 feet.from the Norxh:.Road sand -bas side.yards of 2Q:and;25; feet.:There.is no: evidence .that the:design'orsittrig-.of the #rouse. poses any threat to the character of the area. 5. Based on the foregoing factors, the Board. concludes that grant of..the requested variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or detriment to :nearby properties. F. There is no evidence. that grant.of°the.requested variance will have an adverse effect or mpact on .physical or environmental :conditions: 7_ The.actiori.set forth. below -is. the minimum. necessary to enable applicant to build a,house . . in accordance with his plans.while' preserving:and.protecting the character _of the neighborhood, and the health, safety and welfare of the community. ,RESOLUTIONIACTION: On motion by Memben;Collins,,seconded .by.Member Dinizio, it.was RESOLVED, to GRANT the application as applied for, ,authorizing construction„ for the house as proposed with a third-floor.bedroom suite and. elevator shaft shown on the architectural house plans dated. 7/9/01, SUBJECT TO. THE CONDITIQN that.a comprehensive tire. -prevention, system must be operative throughout.the house at all times. (indoor. s'p r i n k le r This action does not authorize or condone, any current or future use, Setback or other feature of the.subject property.thatviolates -the -Zoning Code, other.than;.such uses,.setbacks.and other-features.as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Goehringer: (Chaimlan), Dinizio, Tortora, and Collins. This Resolution was duly adopted (4-0). AND 11 Th—t.Sojj fiQLD T� dtd O Town . O}eik; Town Of— soathotd . .. 6;4 ar in d ask .. .. .. .. �.. N".. {.'.... r. .. .. .... •n :.. .... �. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer George Horning Ruth D. Oliva Vincent Orlando S,AFF0J j` cz ca = t • 'F 0.�,�Ol BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 765-1809 http://southoldtown.northfork.net RECEIVED i FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF JULY 1.0, 2003 �J;rUL 2 9 2003 Appl. No. 5330- EDGEWATER II, LLC --- Property Location: 63735 C.R. 48, Greenport; CTM 40-1-20.2. Soufhold TOwn Cleric SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without, an; adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's property is a vacant lot in Greenport with 128 feet of frontage on the North Road and 150 feet along the Long Island Sound, a lot depth of 977 feet (east line) and 919 feet (west line). The approximate distance from the property *line along the North Road to the top of the Sound bluff is 810 feet (east line) and 725 feet (west line). BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's March 11, 2003 Notice of Disapproval, citing Section 100-32, in its denial of a building permit to construct a new dwelling with a third story, instead of the code limitation of 2-112 stories and/or exceeding 35 ft. maximum height. (Note: Building Permit #27980-Z was voided by the Building Department based on a different dwelling design and construction details.) FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on June 19, 2003, at which time written .and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and. relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant has revised the construction design of the proposed single-family dwelling as shown on the 'Job No. 209902' Plan, Sheets A2-1 and A2-2, prepared by Ira Haspel,, Architect, P.C. The third level design was revised by applicant to 1138 sq. ft. for the third -floor bedroom suite, instead of the previous request of 990 sq. ft. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Grant of the area variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The architectural plans show a third -floor bedroom suite of 1,138 sq. ft. The ground floor footprint is 3,458 sq. ft., and the second floor covers 2,041 sq. ft. The presence of a third floor does not affect the •40 40' Page 2 —July 10, 2003 Appl.. No. 5330 — Edgewater 11, LLC 40-1-20.2 at Greenport compliance of the roofline with the 35 -ft. limit. Applicants state that the third floor was designed to comply with the Code definition of a half story, but presented no measurements to support the half story. The Board will treat the matter of the third story as a request for a variance. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The proposed house has an irregular roofline made up of various sloping elements with numerous angles. As read from the plans, the maximum roofline is about 38 feet, while the median height of the structure is 35 feet, within the 35 -ft. limit of the Code. The square footage of the third floor bedroom is less than 35 percent! of the.ground floor footprint, and the presence of the third floor does not affect the compliance of the roofline with the 35 -ft. limit. 3. The requested area variance is substantial since 35 percent of the house is based on a variance to complete the third floor. 4. The difficulty was self-created when the applicant designed the house with a third r floor which did not conform to Code requirements. 5. There is no evidence that -the grant of the variance will have an adverse effect or impact on physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The proposed house is set back approximately 520 feet from County Route 48and has all required side yard setbacks. Based on the foregoing factors, the Board concludes that granting of the requested variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or detriment to nearby properties. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-13, motion was offered by Member Orlando, seconded by Chairwoman Tortora; and duly carried, to GRANT, the variance as applied for and shown on the revised plans ('Job No. 209902' Plan, Sheets A2-1 and A2-2) prepared by Ira Haspel, Architect, P.C. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action: Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Tortora (Chairwoman), Orlando, and Oliva. (Absent were Member Goehringer and Member Horning.) This Resolution wa d 3-0). Lydia A ortora, Chairwoman— Approved for Filing 71,V7103 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS • Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer James Dinizio, Jr. Michael A. Simon Leslie Kanes Weisman http://southoldtown.northfork.net Mailing Address: Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road • P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex /First Floor, North Fork Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tell. (631) 765-1809 • Fax (631) 765-9064 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 2, 2006 Appl. No. 5815 - EDGEWATER II, LLC Property Location: 63735 C.R. 48, Greenport CTM 40-1-20.2 RECEIVcD flxZrd /c q -5-10M MAR 2 2006 e _l SOUtEiGld TGc:it Lfer SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type 11 category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's property is a vacant lot in Greenport with 128 feet of frontage on the North Road and 150 feet along the Long Island Sound, a lot depth of 977 feet (east line) and 919 feet (west dine). The approximate distance from the property line along the North Road to the top of the Sound bluff is 810 feet (east line) and 725 feet (west line). BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building. Department's October 19, 2005 Notice of Disapproval, citing Section 100-30A.3, in its denial of an application to amend their request, for structural alterations above the second floor area of this proposed new dwelling. The reason stated by the Building Inspector for disapproving the amendment request is that the zoning code bulk schedule restricts the number of stories to 2-1/2, and the proposed amendment differs greatly from the plan approved under ZBA Appeal No. 5330 concerning the third floor construction area. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on January 26, 2006, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following, facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant revised his plans as shown on the 10/25/05 construction design of the proposed single-family dwelling, shown on the 'Job No. 223705' Plan, Sheets Al and A2, prepared by Ira Haspel, Architect, P.C., reducing the size of the third level design to less than the original size (original size was for 990 square feet). REASONS. FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted.and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Grant of the area variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The applicant's home is situated on one of three parcels as a family compound, sharing a common drive. The architectural plans show a third -floor bedroom suite of 1,138 sq. ft. The ground floor footprint is 3,458 sq. ft., and the second floor covers 2,041 sq. ft. The presence of a third floor does not affect the compliance of the Page 2 —February 2, 2006 • Appl. No. 5815 — Edgewater 11, LLC CTM Parcel 40-1-20.2 at Greenport roofline with the 354 limit. Applicant states that the third floor was designed to comply with the Code definition of a half story, but presented no measurements or evidence to support the half story claimed. The Board will treat the matter of the area above the second floor as a request for a variance from the 2-112 story code restriction. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The proposed house has an irregular roofline made up of various sloping elements with numerous angles. As read from the plans, the maximum roofline is about 38 feet, while the median height of the structure is 35 feet, within the 35 -ft. limit of the Code. The square footage of the third floor bedroom is less than 35 percent of the ground floor footprint, and the presence of the third floor does not affect the compliance of the roofline with the 35 -ft. height limit. 3. The requested area variance is substantial since the overall area has been reduced from 6,449 square feet to 5,941 square feet, and sprinklers will be installed throughout the house. 4. The difficulty was created with the design and plan submitted by the applicant. 5. There is no evidence that the grant of the variance will have an adverse effect or impact on physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The house is approximately 500 feet from County Route 48 and will comply with all code -required side yard setbacks. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Dinizio, seconded by Chairwoman Oliva, and duly carried, to GRANT the variance as applied for and shown on the revised plans (Job Plan No. 2237505, Sheets Al and A2) and Comparison Site Plan last dated 11-10-05, prepared by Ira Haspel Architect, P.S., subject to the following Conditions: 1. That the two green signs installed illegally on utility poles in front of the applicant's property be removed and installed in accordance with the town codes, and 2. That a comprehensive fire suppression system shall be installed and operative throughout the house at all times. (Same as condition written under ZBA #4968). This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Oliva (Chairwoman), Dinizio, Simon, and Weisman. Absent was: Member Goehringer. This Resoluti as duly adopted 4-0). 1 t� . okl�A Runt D. Oliva, Chairwoman C? /►?1� 106 Approved for Filing A ' T FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Town- Hall f D Southold, N.Y. BUILDING PERMIT ' `' 0 + °' (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) PERMIT NO. 31194 Z Date JUNE 10, 2005 Permission is hereby granted to:' EDGEWATER II LLC 27 WEST 96TH ST APT 15D NEW YORK,NY 10025 for CONSTRUCT A 4 BEDROOM 3 STORY ONE FAMILY DWELLING AS APPLIED FOR PER ZBA & PLANNING. THIS PERMIT REPLACES BP30.017. at premises located at 63735 CR 48 GREENPORT County Tax Map No. 473889 Section 040 Block 0001 Lot No. 020.002 pursuant to application dated JUNE 10, 2005 and approved by the Building Inspector to expire on DECEMBER 10, 2006. Fee $ 3,202.80 t ORIGINAL Rev. 5/8/02 Permit #: 38733 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE . SOUTH'OLD,NY B1111 DING= DFERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES WITH ONE SET OF APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) Permission is hereby granted to: Zahler, Kenneth & Joann 430 Moores Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 Date: 3/2612014 To: Construction of a new single family as applied for per SCHD approval. At premises located at: 63735 CR 48, Greenport SCTM # 473889 Sec/Block/Lot # 40.-1-20.2 Pursuant to application dated 3/10/2014 To expire on 9/25/2015. Fees: and approved by the Building Inspector. SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING - ADDITION OR ALTERATION $1,738.00 CO - NEW DWELLING $50.00 1-1 Im TOWN OF SOUTH -OLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD OWNER STREET VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT I al ACR., �Eil REMARKS /Z -7X cA r-', LLC TYPE OF BLD. o /I P R C ASS f LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE 00 l 00 9,4�—, 4�4 1"o L i,,,c, C� -di eTy� f" Z-1 -6 P /4 1 � -L,- 2,-7 4� olavjgk Pl- A-0 2ok 1 2 FRONTAGE ON WATER TILLABLE FRONTAGE ON ROAD WOODLAND DEPTH MEADOWLAND .BULKHEAD HOUSE/LOT TOTAL S ?crr co,,W-X.� C-vt c-,, kcoo M. Bldg. Extension Extension Extension Patio Porch Deck Breezeway Garage O.B._ Pool Foundation i Cr COLOR TRIM - LC Cj� ©m Cr COLOR TRIM - A 2nd -;5. t "''"`? T�• c".°�. _,_r ; m ,.s'�T"` .. i �s ":`*g ^qa-�y'.r ,kf 'Tx4 ,..-'"" " �,..ri,,„�4-a«-r 1• E. a- .. 5 «•. .•rL,,. r. ,• �,,.m . s�7. .u'.:. b ,.r,.;�.. ,_,��'. , mw.. ;y3;;a„-A„.:.- .r.w, ,.=z. 2 5, -w 10.28-98^. + :-zi`. w.. ,c,...s`� 15-10.99 71-19-01 18-02-01 SEE SEC. NO 03 N 348.462 w MATCH _ 72- 01-02 - - - - 2-09-02 _ �..._ UNE )1.14-04 11-24-04 / ® �� �8 .. n.• 1130. 06 / � " � B? 73-28-09 / l /• Inlet Pond 410, 7 1 6.6 r�4 �•�/ W r � (,PENSP.A' 43..5A5A (c) x � /• COUNTY OF SUFFOLK (INLET POINT PARK) 22.1 m 11.2A �� 6A Q / COUNTY OF PI ] SUFFOLK �e 4 . .• 6.3A COUNTY OF q SUFFOLK y N a;� Q.• 10.6 O SEE SCE. NO. 130 9 `G• 1.5A V Q 10.7 _1 Q a, Co _ 1.8A B N OF V O = 23.1 VILLAGE OF24 Q 9.4 a O GREENPORT 2.0A(c) GJ' 10.4 �L 1 �, G+ 1.BA-V'c E "1C 4 21 Q \\N� N 324,712 69 2.6A(c) 3.2 �o 6' E2446.294.50 ' o 6 20.2 1.7A(c) \20.1 7A ccs, 4,W % per. '4f 1• d 25A(c) 3.4 Q 61 N b o 76 A 3.5�ti 1.0A(C) 1.2A a 15 a 3.6 14 27A(c) 1.3A(c) 1-3A 1� z a Q a . 2 6O 23 6A(c) 11.11,4A(c / 1'2.4(c) 9 cn 1 Al2.3A(c) O $ o 6 S33.54.50'E 1.,A(c6.26• r '1b 7 N323.569 39 1.2A(c) 1 E2.44525766 - 46 a S.D. W °� 17.1A(c) 1'2!275]460 ,P N N323.5B1.60 ' 12A(c) E2.4452543fi N89.33WE 4 54 a i N E2.44s. 9e 5 5 p 49.39 4y h LIAM ,9 .323,4]6]5 4� rWry N(- N N62.59V7E 1w ' E2.444.359.a +/rbc g19g N CO 2 0 Q s� 2 " n aM1 J^ "323.2'9.66 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD I 1.1A(c) 3'S�^pJti,2. 4,(,�=QO mxp g> q / (E2.44s.ss944 1 11A(c) a �`' e4�0 001 N p p 2 .327.336.07 NBT•G3Z0'E 1010.65' N 323.200 �4 _- _ !4 u Q• .323.20206 ag �•"5'm'�° VILLAGE OF GREENPORT g MATCH UN p1� �A P15�o da4,363Zvr .�----- •� N323.1a24a LINE SEE SEC. NO. 045 �• E2.41.A3923-yi �S:0 '4 MATCH SEE SEC. NO. 045 �U f L P'oa.^1v6W Uro SwMdm LUN Pn Boa lme SdaUl[u.q Un. -- rymaU pem4Lme --H-- wAfi50W1w.OT¢4445f.uLP�PF6TE5 E (21) O _ _ _ __ _ 4ra; wiHa Twf FnuoMNC Psiwers Z nn.,.. oweLm. sP.00L to sefB warm p,1A1 E Lia N, a.owm Lm. --wi- Ku.al Onorr lm. --T-- I ]t DIs N s4.,,,,rsnm. -�•� - ----• sa:4 Pm...� .,. +.Lr -- L - -L - a - - L -T 46 Lwrefi T 9. Dana L.w MrONvv P.va Ute- FUSE SUF 0 Puca N. 23 121A(4)4112.1A REI "a"'""'"� "-7,,� "'z.. �,3:3 „ 4. J + , �. , �.+`iw.....t .,. �. � .q.:>�_ ,� yam• *_. ""`�,, �,':. 3�-u. �+'ra* �-..._� -i. ,� •�i,� t w . �{8 FtIR"�°,+rrfrD,f:°T'�'IJ Ii. r - do t%�£ Ri�\bs �o f N� ,,., I IIT `� i r �i,� ��,ti •'g�� �, � �� � � fy * �" � �� . a%1 ,i� ,� '� � •'' '�il! S -pl AR5 * .r•�_. A,`�o ?Y', ;► q r w�4". 5� � �' �� YJt f 6a`r'} t a:' 4 r y4 °9 qo o. ', 1.�,qp,• � 5w, � ''�p�{i 1. 1, u4 •R W �,�r G},��R..' 3� �$A'+ \�' f. l � p 3 }� �r r %3 f S► " .4 � � 5 � �y �dT d .;VA Pte; 3 e r tee._ r Vii, �� � A �. � �{�1 ��T...'y.�l^ r .�� 3,:, j�g •'e.,. ^•'t�"6 i �&. a LRay '. � ,-� 'Kai � 4 < i b. '� : -� '�°`P���►i�� �� 16�``�* Ti r.. � � l k� Yr r 't � 9%.e'" a #""m�"i-•' m, i�3e�� ^ ¢ s�`P^" � } l 1 � .�I.i !. ,'^ + le� �`t�ay i�.. � .;gni;•" y� p• Q 4 4'rb'ii 4n\�_ �T^}�k .,4. --`y%i`iaF „g.N 51 ' bq��' a r^' Now x - 1 r .dLL Qi�y � yps � \ t .a '+ta :,._'-`fit RMI f ice° x .:� - .. •+a � ; ��tr�i�"Ii�rirJrr k � 3�d,,J,?` �sa ` � .. ,. � ---•-:. .dLL Qi�y � yps .a '+ta K' 4 —Ton TEST HOLE, DATA (BT OTHERS NOVEMBER 7.2000) 0' DARN BROFM LOAM 1Fnr�"i cuYEr wD P «Aw GRA vAiE eROA. rwE 5A«o �zss JS IA2 Y1 gvt0- R� Dyer � s �,roPv uadmasa..mrsx_ GAcou WOWS —1 ARA: SURVEY OF LOT 2 MAP OF PROPERTY ANTHONY & SALLY PIRRERA FILE No. 8758 FILED JANUARY 7, 1989 SITUATE GREENPORT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK S.C. TAX No. 1000-40-01-20.2 SCALE 1 "=40' SEPTEMBER 5, 2013 MAY 22. 2014 FOUNDATION LOCATION JULY 16, 2014 ADD ORNMAY DRAINAGE AREA = 118,485 sq. ft. 2.720 Dc. ABSTRACTS INCORPORATED FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY KENNETH B. ZAHLER JOANN ZAHLER NOTES: 1. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.G.V.D. 1929 DATUM EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS:.17R EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS: --------ss------- r«rs dr rwox sii s. - Tov or 9ULxKAD s� _ DortoM ar ouLxHEnG BN. - BOiT Y OF IRALL 2. REFER TO FILED MAP FOR TEST HOLE DATA. 3. MINIMUM SEPTIC TANK CAPACITIES FOR 4 BEDROOM HOUSE IS 1,200 GALLONS. 1 TANK; 8' DIA. 4' DEEP 4. MINIMUM LEACHING SYSTEM FOR 4 BEDROOM HOUSE IS 300 eq TI SIDEWALL AREA. 1 POO �L;.� 12' DEEP, 8' dio. ,S,l PROPOSED EXPANSION POOL PROPOSED LEACHING POOL (7o) PROPOSED SEPTIC TANK 5. THE LOCATION OF WELLS AND CESSPOOLS SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM FIELD OBSERVATIONS AND/OR DATA OBTAINED FROM OTHERS. g !sz z �4" 3 Z RL „°rDRNx' a de a_ �o J cp +;11gw. .-00 y0 �T UINIT—ZEDA-M AT OR ADDUIGN ry rOU��z�m511F NEW rtIRSiAn. rEvl""E °SHo sumcsulnr.YNi"rm .O *u <." , Nm G xsxco o si A .-Au0 mmUEu mx. RECRI GN TO 1HESPEReON 1 THE EXISTENCE Or RIGHT or WATS AND/DR EASE— OF RECORD. IF AN.. NOT SHOWN ARE 107 GUARANTEED ease aG. x. / u.: = u.e .•.r4m n � R, vwWx (x) e• W.. x a• NW STORM _R, vows MpPOSEO r O.A. IIF DEEP MW US MR ROD, RUx-Or. ARE S-1 THUS. --I AREAr T: x.000 w swoon w a a�. n , Ljss.e.1Uh O.re'e rROWa {17 e' aa. x s• Nqn slow DnIx9roOLa+nT�il IRE---- RE�H cRNR DR.—. DR. ARA z: 1.000 w. U 400Or DRNEWAY AT e' RARE = 3.200 fl. ARA RY —Dr. *R mXINO AL . 4.eoo p. n. TYPICAL STORMWATER UNIT 4eoD R n x oYll = eu XN. x NAP 0! •• NNIE x . JEER Irl— DRAM AR ..L.1 (TOPS TO K TRAFFIC fiEARNG) n` / a.• eu- n.. r10 UwAR FEEL m FRENCH DRNNRREEDEOE (NOT TO SCALE) as Wal Rxcr rRAxE a m.RR Rx RDxTnRccO colt coM;R '� PRov�x (+) e' aa. X s' nqn STORM GRAN, ML RUN TRE«c1 GRAIN lF�oc+wn lenge rwE wol e rwrc euRNc we mo"FRENCH CH DRAIN DETAIL I (NOT TO SCALE) 1 - COARS s EE �A STC . I Y E 4' ---� J- RL „°rDRNx' a de a_ �o J cp +;11gw. .-00 y0 �T UINIT—ZEDA-M AT OR ADDUIGN ry rOU��z�m511F NEW rtIRSiAn. rEvl""E °SHo sumcsulnr.YNi"rm .O *u <." , Nm G xsxco o si A .-Au0 mmUEu mx. RECRI GN TO 1HESPEReON 1 THE EXISTENCE Or RIGHT or WATS AND/DR EASE— OF RECORD. IF AN.. NOT SHOWN ARE 107 GUARANTEED