Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-37.-5-7
OFFICE. LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY 11971 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Leslie Weisman, Chair Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner "�v4 LWRP Coordinator Date January 23, 2015 Re: Coastal Consistency Review for ZBA File Ref. 860 BAYVIEW DRIVE, LLC #6829 SCTM# 1000-37=5-7 860.BAYVIEW DRIVE. LLC #6829 - Request for Variance from Article XXII Section 280-116B and the Building Inspector's September 3, 2014,. renewed December 15, 2014 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit to construct a deck, at; 1) less than the code required bulkhead setback of 75 feet, located at: 860 Bayview Drive (adj. to Spring Pond) East Marion, NY. SCTM#1000- 37-5-7 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town,Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my determination that the proposed second story addition is EXEMPT from LWRP review pursuant to: - § 268-3. Definitions. MINOR ACTIONS item "II' which states: ll. Additions to an existing building or rebuilt residential structure which results in no net increase in ground area coverage, except where the parcel is located in a coastal erosion hazard area; The proposed elevated deck is a minor action. The parcel is not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Cc: Stephen Kiely, Assistant Town Attorney BOARD MEMBERS Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Eric Dantes Gerard P. Goehringer George Horning Kenneth Schneider http://southoldtown.northfork.net Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road • P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex /First Floor, Capital One Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 • Fax (631) 765-9064 December 19, 2014 Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Southold, NY 11971 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. #6829 — 860 Bayview Drive LLC Dear Mr.. Terry' We have received an application for construction of new decking in F. Marion. A copy of the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval under Chapter 280 (Zoning Code), and survey map,,project description form, are attached for your reference. Your written evaluation with recommendations for this proposal, as required under the Code procedures of LWRP Section 268-51) is requested within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman Chairperson Encls. FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL TO: Michael Kimack for 860 Bayview Dr. LLC 28495 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Date: September 3, 2014 Updated: December 15, 2014 Please take notice that your application dated August 18, 2014 For permit to construct new decking Location of property: 860 Bayview Dr., E. Marion, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 37 Block 5 Lot 7 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed deck construction in the R40 District, is not permitted pursuant to Article XXII, section 280-116 (B), which states "All building or structures located on lots upon which a bulkhead ...exists... shall be set back not less than 75 feet from the bulkhead." The survey shows a setback of 57. V from the bulkhead. /C Authorized Signature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require: further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A. Fee: $ Filed By: Assignment No, APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS AREA VARIANCE House No. 49,6 Q Street Hamlet,PION SCTM 1000 Section Block:�— Lot(s)7 _Lot Size Zone_E 4 I (WE) APPEAJ, T E WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING IN ,PE TOR DATED BASED ON SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED 2p , Applicants)/Owner(s): VR/V11�5, ZZ C Mailing Address: 4(� f'�A G'l_/��,l�V� ✓'�i� CeZr� Al. y //-5-7? Telephone: / 6Z —Wax: Email: NOTE: In addition to the above, please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney, agent,, architect, builder, contract vendee, etc. and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative: /�' ,q l ,g1 /C/ Ole for QCT Owner. ( )Other: Address:/.P/1�1J� 2.�� L��l/y�.r NY 1190 Telephone: 6:F-/- 9Zi :2/lJ3Fax: jr_4 HE Email: "ielll i�1/,�,ey 4/9� Please check to specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to, from the above names: ( ) Applicant/Owner(s), tP4 Authorized Representative, ( ) Other Name/ Address below: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE PLA DATED ZP Z 61a and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED %�, OR: Building Permit O Certificate of Occupancy O Pre -Certificate of Occupancy () Change of Use ( ) Permit for As -Built Construction ( ) Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed.. (Indicate Article, Section, Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code.) Article: Section: $O Subsection: /IA Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: (?� A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. () A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law- Section 280-A. ( ) Interpretation of the Town Code, Article Section O Reversal or Other A prior appeal O has, CJ has not been made at any time -with respect to this property, UNDER Appeal No(s). Year(s). . (Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our off ce for assistance) Name of Owner: ZBA File# REASONS FOR APPEAL (Please be specific, additional sheets may be used with preparer's signature notarized): 1, An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighbor or a detriment to nearby— properties if granted, because: p�O�Q�NO —� py AA—:416 Pe' tioT �2 �ivr Z4&06,17 l e"'.P2.' old/ W11W 7;V,,`- AAC14p, 40 AC XV -E .5X1 W'V &SES/D�� xwo W/u /!/D7�,gGa CSG &E16 Ilse,&-'VZ7 p�1J,C�11yGS x/1 1/1 2. The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: 7`,y .-)GU,/I/G lS A.7 ' ,,E' 7S.f15,6A4/6 The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: � D ��Dr�L/ flr72UC�� T�,� �,�2a'Pr)4Q5P DSC/c /s �1 W IrI71 A11A1/Mind 61'' ^^C7- eV 61'04 J'Le 4.. The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: pe �ipOp��� Zkj, ✓�%rr%/2y 1%�('%G` �%`A!� GvlzL 41I4V"'X:�- HIV1,001.,41- PWICAZ 012 ON v�i�D/Lltil�li�G l�l�i9-off 5. Has the alleged difficulty been self created? V Yes, or { ) No Why: Are there any Covenants or Restrictions concerning this land? jej No { } Yes (please furnish a copy) This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community, Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent (Agent must submit written Authorization from Owner) Sw rnto before e is day 0 lou 2 1 r �- C/ Notary Public VICKI TOTH Notary Public Stat of New York No. QN61�0696 Qualified in Suffolk County Cammissinn Fxnires July 28,20 APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION APPLICANT: 860i3�Y1✓/ IAVD,(�/1/f LL C. DATE PREPARED: /_ /��Z0/ ' 1. For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed: 411A II. New Construction Areas (New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Dimensions of first floor extension: NIA Dimensions of new second floor: ._f COrlJ,l� //,' X ZqF% Dimensions of floor above second level: M1161 Height (from finished ground to top of ridge): N�%1 Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed? If yes, please provide height (above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: /Y/I# III. Proposed Construction Description (Alterations or Structural Changes) (Attach extra sheet if necessary). Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations://�"j"�>Z� "'-Izy 1e�5 11 UJB.lNI-9 45A2 '6,F,' 2 �LDG,p9 Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: Z S A),Q C,t, 4A,1G,C-,jy rD IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage (from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: _ ,'0 Proposed increase of building coverage: Square footage of your lot: -Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: VI. Please describe the land contours (flat, slope %, heavily wooded, marsh area, etc.) on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement (s): Please submit 8 sets of photos, labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staldng corners for new construction, and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 4/2012 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? Yes __X_No B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? _No Yes please explain on attached sheet. C. 1.) Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? Ms 2.) Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application? YE -P 3.) Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? YAF 4.) If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? Nb/M Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees: and if issued, please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. D. - Is there a depression or sloping elevation near- the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? N/) E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting? /VD Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above line. F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises?A10 if yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe: G. Please attach all pre -certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject prernises. If any are lacking, please apply to the Building Department to either obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel? /1/0 If yes, please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel and the proposed use���.Uj'r/� L (ex: existing single family, proposed: same with garage, pool or other) &e4A4!!�l 1//24/Za/q Authorized signature and Date FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Halle Southold, i,'.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No: Z-33072 Date: 06/04/08 THIS CERTIFIES that the building NEW DWELLING Location of Property: 860 BAYVI9W DR EAST MARION (HOUSE NO.) (STREET) (HAMLET) County Tax Map No. 473889 Section 37 Block 5 Lot 7 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit•heretofore filed in this office dated MAY 9, 2006 pursuant to which Building Permit No.' 32042-Z dated MAY 25, 2006 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. :The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ONE FAMILY DWELLING WITH COVERED ENTRY, TERRACE AND TWO CAR GARAGE UNDER AS APPLIED FOR. The certificate is issued to PATRICIA A JOHNSON (OWNER') of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL, R10-05-0185 12/04/,07 ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO 30.00513 09,/17/07 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED 09/14/0.7 TODD DAWSON e 1 Autffiorized Signature Rev. 1/81 AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WHEN TO USE THIS FORM: This form must be completed by the applicant for any special use permit, site plan approval, use variance, area variance or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district OR within 500 feet of a farm operation located in an agricultural district. All applications requiring an agricultural data statement must be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance with Section 2391r and 239n of the General Municipal Law. 1. Name of Applicant: tel. AG //-/Vv 2. Address of Applicant: mega� 3. Name of Land Owner (if other than Applicant): e,066V%,61,& ,OAA ZzC. 4. Address of Land Owner: CLIF/= 4V,6.�, �it1- L'L1�� W -Y 1/s79 5. Description of Proposed Project: 00,V_ g2t61 CT!,PV at5 AVP &V -6M 1--r x z4(rY' Location of Property: (road and Tax map number) fdo C�.�YvWg1,Pn. "!y'M/ifLa.0 Tei/'NB l00, � 3Z -s =) Is the parcel within 500 feet of a farm operation? { } Yes X No Is this parcel actively farmed? { ) Yes V No Name and addresses of any owner(s) of land within the agricultural district containing active farm operations. Suffolk County Tax Lot numbers will be provided to you by the Zoning Board Staff, it is your responsibility to obtain the current names and mailing addresses from the Town Assessor's Office (765-1937) or from the Real Property Tax Office located in Riverhead. NAME and ADDRESS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (Please use the back of this page if there are additional property owners) Signature of Applicant Date Note: 1. The local Board will solicit comments from the owners of land identified above in order to consider the effect of the proposed action on their farm operation. Solicitations will be made by supplying a copy of this statement. 2. Corrunents returned to the local Board will be taken into consideration as'part as the overall review of this application. 3. Copies of the completed Agricultural Data Statement shall be sent by applicant to the property owners identified above. The cost for mailing shall be paid by the Applicant at the time the application is submitted for review. 617.20 Appendix B Short Environmental Assessment Form Instructions for Completin$Z Part 1 - Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 - Project and Sponsor Information 6�d 4 C Name of Action or Project: AO Project Location (describe, and attach a location map): Brief Description of Proposed Action; _ ZN0 2ot�x 2A -r c,5 141W 61 OC1L . _ - r� c� Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: :727`2769-5 E-Ma'I H G 2 A, V' 20 ." . A-1 14 C L Address: Pply r ,� City/PO: State: Zip Code: 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, NO YES administrative rule, or regulation? If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding frorn any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or a roval: sOlrTi�dr-.d i�ipvs�'�t.S' 3.a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action9 ares b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? aoewcres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? _ " 2_) acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on, adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑ Urban ❑ Rural (non -agriculture) ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial WeResidential (suburban) ❑ Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic ❑ Other (specify): ❑ Parkland Page 1 of 4 5. Is the proposed action, a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations'? b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? NO YES N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? NO YES y 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes, identify: NO YES 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? b. Are public transportation service(s) available at or near the site of the proposed action? c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? NO YES Y 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: NO YES y 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? If No, describe method for providing potable water: NO YES 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: NO YES X 12. a. Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic Places? b. Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? NO YES 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency? b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: NO YES X` 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: IdShoreline ❑ Forest ❑ Agricultural/grasslands ❑ Early mid -successional Wetland ❑ Urban Nf Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? NO YES X/ 16. Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non -point sources? If Yes, a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? %NO ❑ YES b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)? If Yes, briefly describe: NO ❑ YES NO YES Page 2 of 4 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of water or other liquids (e.g. retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)? If Yes, explain purpose and size: NO YES small to large impact impact may 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste management facility? If Yes, describe: NO YES occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 20. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: NO YES establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: AV 01VAI-1-Z A Date: I//24�� p�4 Signature: Part 2 - Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept "Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" Page 3 of 4 No, or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit, biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to.incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a. public / private water supplies? b, public / private wastewater treatment utilities? S. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic, archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources (e.g., wetlands, waterbodies, groundwater, air quality, flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 Part 3 - Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency detennined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and cumulative impacts. ❑ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. ❑ Check this box if you have determined, based on -the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 No, or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion, flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3 - Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency detennined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and cumulative impacts. ❑ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. ❑ Check this box if you have determined, based on -the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 Board of Zoning Appeals Application AUTHORIZATION (Where the Applicant is not the Owner) 86-0 /-//YPI/.4=VV 9/2/ pl " (Z C2 I, TOd/ C114 1-1,P,4 residing atT (Print property owner's name) (Mailing Address) //Iy do hereby authorize T� (Agent) ! R%1/�.PJ!'1).r Ny to apply for variance(s) on my behalf from the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals, 'l; 14 (Print Owner' Name) AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME : HI N/w,,� 14, ,_//9l%/C. (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Variance Change of Zone Approval of Plat Other (activity) Building Permit Trustee Permit X Coastal Erosion Mooring Planning Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicant/agent/representative) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply) : A) the owner of greater that 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation) B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non -corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation) C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or D) the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this 24 day of,r O V—) 20� Signature AA 6� Print Name /t'lel—A/"CL 14, APPLICANT/OWNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. 616,0,91*YVIIA-W PK%V� a YOUR NAME : ov-4&M (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance X Trustee Permit �( Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other (activity) Planning Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO X If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicant/agent/representative) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply) A) the owner of greater that 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation) B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non -corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation) C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or D) the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitte this .91 , 201 Signature ,•Y Print Name Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law, This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in malting a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to malting a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown. northfork. net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# ; 7 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board Planning Dept. 0 Building Dept. ® Board of Trustees 0 Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: yw/ Z!-n0O P Z, 11-7 2�T G9&AV7Ie C% CZY I -1, Location of action:_ YV/,5G(% P �j�2,517- Site acreage: 6� �, Q Q 4� SQ2 , Present land use;,J'jp �IA— Present zoning classification: 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Zgeo B4yV/� y delyz al C (b) Mailing address: 4r6 , 3SA CL/Oc2c // , J*2W Ct Z6 ' IVY. M-72 (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( ) /> �7 ,62 5�4�6 (d) Application number, if any; Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No 15 '7'1 If yes, which state or federal agency? DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes ❑ No x Not Applicable J Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes ® No 0 Not Applicable ILL Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria Yes 0 No � Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes 0 No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes 0 No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. Yes ❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of'the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Ye❑ No 1"AW Not Applicable mach additional sheets it necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water -dependent uses and promote siting of new water -dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No FLX�'J' Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary. Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No L"�KJ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No I�XS Not Applicable Created on 5125105 11:20 AM -NMWAI . 11., NOW OVA k - I or ,i__1_�. ow -wommok "44 men son son MRS 0 OEM - ---------- ----'-- --- F Ime NJoseph pCiampi Taken Nov. 1zzm* Looking North IN (8) Joseph P. Ciampi Taken Nov. 17,am* Looking West SOUTHOLD BOARD OF APPEALS PRIOR FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATIONS REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FROM BULKHEAD SETBACK 1. ZBA File: 3557 Approval to construct new dwelling on old foundation 40 feet from the outer edge of the existing concrete bulkhead 2. ZBA File: 3.864 Approval for construction of one family dwelling with insufficient rear yard setbacks, approx. 75 feet from the bulkhead 3. ZBA File: 4044 Approval for an open deck for a minimum distance at 39.5 feet from the bulkhead 4. ZBA File: 4118 Approval of construction of open deck 36 feet from bulkhead 5. ZBA file: 4782 Approval of construction of decks 20 feet and 16 feet from the bulkheads. (originally requested 13 feet at the northwest corner, 19 feet at the north side, 14 feet at the northwest corner and 47 feet at the est side from the bulkheads 6. ZBA file: 5312 Approval of new foundation and additions not less than 73 feet to the bulkhead 7. ZBA file: 6277 Approval of construction of additions and alterations to an existing dwelling with a rear porch at 23.3 feet from the bulkhead T L-n`ub 08-27-98 0313-00 05-7400 09-17-01 } 05-2t-03 0B-0}OC i' 06-21-04 g� O A / 3/ � I If ORIENT f i fr I HARBOR I( I g�Q_ByYV/EN! p.P�YE LSC, N3501R �. �. n em Ta. ------ �n •d — —� — — '�aD "° ' — — N — — _.a awsEKLNa NOTICE a. u``� COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © !}� K we TO N� OF S0UTHOtD >Aw, . wa wnar�FouwwnosTwcrs�, E E e.�,a..�..�m o,.n swam Geu9n0w 21) —� — ( 2 O n. dwai.. --r-- ww. oa.a t.. --R-- co4oa tY'Eri yt0- WLNTENM10E. ALTERATXM SAIF OR .i Y• a Real Property Tax Service Agency ^ Y OF G —_—__—_ ., sme.;,,m,trw �a+�.�.s.. t4ey, o..etR --w-- Nmdoma u. --lar-- art 26 '*�� OSMBVnON Or"'PORTION OF iNE iQ ,-,7 County Center Itiverheae, N Y 11901 0]2 VILLAGE E �v..- raw�u� —_ — —T — — fav 0evets— — A — — Lbrt �t �— ,crust SIFFOLKCOVNTYTM t 4S PRONIBITEp n - . w n SGatEMMT M 132 N v.,..,vm. �.1--. an `� —__ 4nmant.. --.-- w. o...,�--ww-- nwA 65 .umwHce �� r:rtYw4ER� wrrmoV MrrTENPCM=ONOFTNE •b-+ tm a I. lm _.h,+. Y�`tt'.� A 0>8 DISTRICT NO 1000 12 A(d)>42.4w owa,.. REAL RIOPERTV TAX SEfMCEAGENCY. ?,y`;Xcc� P .,�.p� . a" =. ` �':�._ #i`F... b{''.3.. .c.. .'� ..S_ a`. r t. �..f- 4: 2 i'�' .r -% <.. -,'S ._ ..v,.A.�-.._ .�. .. _'1, r. � .3�,.�`�"�.: i,-. ...r-.T4•�s-.-vs� - ...:f�.. ... .. ... -.. ... ig _ .:x f .. S#�'�F ...,-... . i •:� . `4- .. -x :, s,.... . .. :ice.., • _'h ). .. -,.. a .�-. _•- ,.. :�.4.. .. .: _ ..r<:4...et_ Y-5-}+ - _� �. `'� .. s? t .. _- ..... _.. .... - .. .�... ._... . ... ....... .. _ _.. _. .352.382 N 350.482 SECTION NO 37 PRO ER MAP o��g�FFOtk�o� Southold Town Board of o . Appeals MAIN ROAD -STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765.1809 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3557 (After rehearing) Application Dated November 24, 1986 TO: Mr. Garrett A. Strang, Architect [Appellant(s)] for MR. ROBERT EGAN Main Road, Box 1412 Southold, NY 11971 At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on January 8, 1987, the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property New York Town Law, Section 280-a [ ] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance Article , Section [X] Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance Article III, Section 100-31 [ ] Request for Application of ROBERT G. EGAN to amend Conditional Approval Rendered 11/3/86 under Appeal No. 3557 to allow reconstruction of dwelling with insufficient setbacks upon foundation as exists at 5 and 12 feet, rather than 7 and 12 feet, at 330 Knoll Circle, East Marion, NY; "Map of Section Two, Gardiners Bay Estates," Subdivision Lots 27 and part of 28; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 37, Block 5, Lot 12. WHEREAS, a conditional approval was granted by this Board under Appeal No. 3557 on November 3, 1986 as noted therein; and WHEREAS, the applicant has requested reconsideration of Condition No. 1 which restricted the westerly sideyard setback at seven feet; and WHEREAS, a resolution was adopted by this Board on November 20, 1986 by unanimous vote of all the members to re -open the hearing to re -consider the variance requested under Article III, Section 100-31 as to the westerly sideyard setback reduction; and WHEREAS, notice was published and posted as required by law on this public hearing, which was held on December 11, 1986; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the board made the following findings of fact: I. By this application, a Variance is requested from Condition No. 1 of this Board's decision rendered November 3, 1986 which reads as follows: (CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO) DATED: January 8, 1987. CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD Form ZB4 (rev. 12/81) OF APPEALS r -- Page 2 - Appeal No. 3557 as Amended Matter of ROBERT EGAN Decision Rendered January 8, 1987 "...Minimum setback from the west (side) property line at seven feet... 2. Applicant proposes to reconstruct new dwelling upon existing foundation, rather than new foundation, which presently is set back five feet at its nearest point.from the northwest property line (at the northwest corner) and 12 feet at its near- est point from the southwest property line (at the northeast corner), as more particularly shown on Drawing SP -1 dated September 5, 1986, prepared by Garrett A. Strang, Architect. 3. The premises in question is a substandard parcel con- taining a total area of 7,511± sq, ft. with 56 ft, frontage along the west side of Knoll Circle and widening to 69± feet in width along the bulkhead area. 4. The subject premises is located in the Hamlet of East Marion and is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 37, Block 5, Lot 12 (also referred to as Lot 27 and part of 28, Map of Section Two, Gardiners Bay Estates filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office September 23, 1927 as Map #275). This parcel is improved with a single-family one-story frame dwelling structure set back five feet (at the closest point) and 7± feet (at the farthest point) from the west side property line, 28 feet (at the closest point) and 40 feet (at the farthest point) from the front property line along Knoll Circle, and 40± feet from the outer edge of exist- ing concrete bulkhead, as depicted on survey prepared October 6, 1958 by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C. 5. It is noted for the record that the Variances granted by this Board on November 3, 1986 included: (a) Minimum setback from the east side property line at 12 feet [as established by existing foundation]; (b) Minimum total sideyards at 12 and 7 feet; (c) Minimum frontyard setback not closer than 28 feet from the closest point; (d) Minimum setback from existing concrete bulkhead along Spring Pond at 35 feet for the newly proposed deck addi- tion [at the closest point], and 38 feet for the newly Proposed two -foot cantilever. In considering this application, the board also finds and determines: (a) that the variance requested is substantial in relation to the requirements, being a variance of 50% of the required 10 -foot sideyard setback and a varianceof 32% of the required total 25 -foot sideyards; (b) there will be no increase in population density and this project will not produce an undue burden on available governmental facilities; (c) the grant of this variance will not produce a substantial change in the character of the neighborhood or create a sub- stantial detriment to adjoining properties since the setbacks are established with the existing foundation structure; (d) the difficulty cannot be obviated by a method feasible for appellant to pursue other than a variance; (e) the circum- stances of the property are unique; (f) the practical difficulties claimed are sufficient to warrant a granting Of this variance; (g) that in consideration of all the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by allowing a variance, as conditionally noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Douglass, seconded by Mr. Sawicki, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT a Variance for the proposed recon- Page 3 Appeal No. 3557 as Amended Matter of ROBERT EGAN Decision Rendered January 8, 1987 struction of the single-family dwelling upon existing foundation in the Matter of the Application of ROBERT T EGAN SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The reconstruction of the dwelling, including cornices, overhangs, steps, etc., shall be not closer than five feet from the west side property line and not closer than 12 feet from the east side property line (at the closest points as estab- lished and shown on survey dated October 6, 1958 prepared by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C. 2. If foundation is reconstructed, setbacks from the side property lines shall not be closer than seven feet from the west side and 12 feet from the east side (including cornices, overhangs., steps, etc.) at the nearest points..at the north corners. Decision3. This approval shall bamendment dh renderedNovember3,1986,andConditionNo. I thereof, and incorporates Conditions No. 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 herein. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Douglass, Doyen and Sawicki. (Member Grigonis abstained due to his absence at the public hearing [illness].) This resolution was adopted with a majority plus one votes (4) of the five members present. �+� rte' i ' GERARD P. GOEfiRINGEf�; CHAIRMAN January 14, 1987 `IFiL' SIO J ��%LD�D FI. PATE /�� ✓.S k 1?oun"" • -3-S, fiM A _ Town Clcrk, Tot,,., --_ ---- �f�outktold ti s Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 25 P.O. BOX 1179 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 766-1808 FAX No. (516) 785-1823 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR, JOSEPH H. SAWICKI JAMES DIN1Zl0, JR, ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Appl. No. 3864: Matter of LEOPOLD STERN. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XXIII, Section 100-239d, B, (Article XXIV, Section 100-244, as disapproved) -for permission to construct a one family dwelling with an insufficient rearyard setback, approximately 75 feet from the bulkhead in this R-40 Zone District. Property Location: 1390 Bayview Drive, East Marion, County Tax Map District 1000, Section 37, Block 5, Lot 22. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on September 21, 1989.in the matter.of the Application of LEOPOLD STERN. under Appeal 3864; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is located along the south side of Bayview Drive, East,Marion, and is identified an the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 37, Block 5, Lot 22. 2. This is an -application for Variances from the Zoning Code Article XXIII,'Section 100-239d, B. (Article XXIV, Section 100-244) with insufficient rear yard setbacks, approximately 75 feet from the bulkhead. y Page 2 - Appl. No. 3864 Matter of LEOPOLD STERN Decision rendered October 12, 1989 3. Article XXIII, Section 100-239d, B, all buildings located on lots upon which a bulkhead, concrete wall, riprap or similar structure exists and which are adjacent to tidal water bodies other than sounds shall be set back not less than seventy five (75) feet from the bulkhead. Article XXIV Section 100-244 (A), this subsection is , intended to provide minimum standards for granting of a building - permit for lots made nonconforming or continued in a state of nonconformance by the .adoption of this Article and that were singly and separately owned as of the effective date of this Article. 4. The subject premises is vacant and consists of a total lot area of .301+- acre, the proposed dwelling will have nonconforming setbacks, in front and rearyard areas. 5. In considering this application, the Board finds and determines: (a) that the circumstances of this application are uniquely related to the premises and its established nonconformities; (b) that the variance will not in turn cause a substantial effect on the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience and/or order of the Town; (c) that in carefully considering the record and all the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by granting the variance, as applied conditionally notes below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Dinizio, Seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was Page 3 - Appl. No. 3864 Matter of LEOPOLD STERN Decision rendered October 12, 1989 RESOLVED, to GRANT a Variance in the matter of the application of LEOPOLD STERN as applied under Appeal No. 3864 for the placement of a single-family dwelling, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. That the existing setbacks remain the same, with the exception of the setback of Spring Pond which will be 21+- feet, as shown on survey; dated 9/26/89, prepared by R. Van Tuyle P.E. 2. A suggestion in the construction process that straw/hay bales be placed approximately 15 feet from the bulkhead, running the distance of the construction, during construction period so that there will be no soil intrusion into Spring Pond. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, (absent, Serge Doyen, Fishers Island and Joe Sawicki). This resolution was duly adopted. df l GERARD P. GOE INGER, C AIRMAN RECEIVED AND FILED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK DATE -'', �I"i HOUR , Town Clerk, Town of Sout old APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer., Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Telephone (516) 765-1809 Appl. No. 4044. BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ACTION OF THE BOARD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 Upon application of WILLIAM, AILEEN AND JOHN PARROTT. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4B and Article XXIV, Section 100-244B for approval of deck construction at less than 75 feet from the bulkhead and in excess of the 200 lot coverage limitation for all structures. The subject parcel is substandard in size and is located in the R-40 Zone District. Location of Property: 2435 Cedar Lane, East Marion; County Tax Map No. 1000-37-4-9. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on September 12, 1991, and at said hearing, all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; WHEREAS, Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the' Board made the following findings of fact: 1. By this application, appellant seeks a variance under Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4B for permission to construct an 500 sq. ft. open deck extension 16.2 feet from the rear (easterly end) of the existing dwelling. 2. The premises in question is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 37, Block 4, Lot 9 and contains a total lot area of 7,336 sq. ft. 3. The dwelling as exists presently has nonconforming sideyards totaling 29-1/2 feet (7 and 12-1/2), a nonconforming front yard setback at 24 feet, a nonconforming setback from the bulkhead at 56 feet, and nonconforming lot coverage at 24% (1754 sq. ft.). The parcel as exists is substandard with 7,336 sq. ft. in total lot area and a width (frontage) of 56.0 feet. Page, 2 - ZBA Appl. No. 4044 Matter of JOHN PARROTT and OTHERS Decision Rendered September 12, 1991 4. Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4B of the Zoning Code requires all buildings and structures located on lots upon which a bulkhead, concrete wall, rip -rap or similar structure exists and which is adjacent to tidal water bodies other than the Long Island Sound to be set back not less than seventy-five (75) feet from the bulkhead. 5. Article XXIV, Section 100-244B limits lot.sin a nonconforming status to a maximum lot coverage for all buildings at 20 percent of the total lot area. The increase of the lot coverage over the existing dwelling is 500 sq. ft., or 7%, for a total of 31%. 6. For the record it is noted that similar relief has been granted for other parcels in the area, along Sigsbee Road, etc. 7. In.considering this application, the Board finds: (a) the relief requested is substantial in relation to the code requirements although the square footage of construction over that which exists is minimal; (b) the relief requested is the minimum necessary to afford relief; the construction is for an open, unroofed addition without a foundation or basement and without a roof or full enclosure; (c) the relief as requested will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; (d) the practical difficulties imposed are uniquely related to the property and are not personal; (e) the grant of the relief as requested will not in turn be adverse to the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of the town, or be adverse to the neighboring properties; (f) in view of all the above, the interests of justice will be served by granting the relief as requested and conditionally noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Dinizio, seconded by Mr. Villa, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT a variance for a 500 sq. ft. open deck addition at the rear (east end) of dwelling with a reduced 16.2' setback, for a minimum distance from the bulkhead at 39.5+ -feet, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Page 3 - Appl. No. 4044 Matter of JOHN PARROTT and OTHERS Decision Rendered September 12, 1991 1. The southerly (side) yard shall remain open and free of obstructions (with the exception of the existing flagstone area). 2. The deck addition remain open and unroofed, as applied. (All roof runoff must be retained on site.) Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Dinizio and Villa. (Members Grigonis and Doyen were absent.) This resolution was duly adopted. lk GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, AIRMAN RECEIVED AND FILED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK DATE 9/-Z31st HOUR P'51S a-77� A -• A - TownClerk, Town of Southold Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ACTION OF THE BOARD Appl. No. 4118. SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P,O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 Upon application of GLADYS L. MILNE. A Variance is requested under Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4B and Section 100-244B for permission to build a wooden patio deck with an insufficient sideyard setback, insufficient setback from existing bulkhead, and with lot coverage at more than 20% of the code limitation. Location of Property: 240 Knoll Circle, East Marion; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 37, Block 5, Lot 15; Gardiners Bay Estates Lot No. 31. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on July 29, 1992, at which time all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; WHEREAS, Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present (R-40) zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. By this application, appellant seeks a variance under Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4B for approval of a new wooden deck over the existing patio area and extending in a northerly direction, along the westerly side of the dwelling. The setback requested is approximately one foot from the westerly property line and 36+- feet approximately from the outer edge of the existing southerly bulkhead. The lot coverage variance requested would be 821 sq. ft. over the allowable 20% (or 29.4%). 2. The premises in question is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 37, Block 5, Lot 15 and contains a total lot area of 19,550+- sq. ft. 3. The dwelling as exists presently has the following nonconformities: (a) sideyards at 11+ ft. at the easterly side, and total sideyards at 23+- feet; (b) setback between the existing stone/concrete wall and the lower bulkhead approximately 30 feet; (c) setback from the southerly {rear} APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS �OSUFFO(,��0 Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman o Serge Doyen, Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. y O Robert A. Villa i Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ACTION OF THE BOARD Appl. No. 4118. SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P,O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 Upon application of GLADYS L. MILNE. A Variance is requested under Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4B and Section 100-244B for permission to build a wooden patio deck with an insufficient sideyard setback, insufficient setback from existing bulkhead, and with lot coverage at more than 20% of the code limitation. Location of Property: 240 Knoll Circle, East Marion; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 37, Block 5, Lot 15; Gardiners Bay Estates Lot No. 31. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on July 29, 1992, at which time all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; WHEREAS, Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present (R-40) zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. By this application, appellant seeks a variance under Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4B for approval of a new wooden deck over the existing patio area and extending in a northerly direction, along the westerly side of the dwelling. The setback requested is approximately one foot from the westerly property line and 36+- feet approximately from the outer edge of the existing southerly bulkhead. The lot coverage variance requested would be 821 sq. ft. over the allowable 20% (or 29.4%). 2. The premises in question is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 37, Block 5, Lot 15 and contains a total lot area of 19,550+- sq. ft. 3. The dwelling as exists presently has the following nonconformities: (a) sideyards at 11+ ft. at the easterly side, and total sideyards at 23+- feet; (b) setback between the existing stone/concrete wall and the lower bulkhead approximately 30 feet; (c) setback from the southerly {rear} Page 2 - Appl. No. 4118 Matter of GLADYS J. MILNE Decision Rendered August 18, 1992 end of the dwelling is shown to be 50+- feet to the outer edge of the bulkhead along Spring Pond. The patio area which exists and will be replaced by a wooden deck is located at the southwesterly side of the dwelling, is landward of the timber retaining walls, and has a side yard setback of approximately one foot. 4. Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4B of the Zoning Code requires all buildings and structures located on lots upon which a bulkhead, concrete wall, rip -rap or similar structure exists and which is adjacent to tidal water bodies other than the Long Island Sound to be set back not less than seventy-five (75) feet from the bulkhead. The land area which is the subject of this requirement is lanedward of the timber retaining walls and extending northerly, within the westerly side yard area, a distance of 54 feet. 5. Article XXIV, Section 100-244B, and Bulk Area -Setback Schedule provides for 20% lot coverage for all buildings. The total for the dwelling as exists is approximately 1700 sq. ft. The area of the proposed wooden deck is approximately 925 sq. ft. 6. In considering this application, Board Members find that the relief as requested is substantial and finds an alternative, with a three foot minimum setback from the side property line to be the minimum necessary under the circumstances, and finds: (a) the relief requested is not substantial in relation to the existing nonconforming setback from the bulkhead along Spring Pond and setback from the side property line for the patio, to be replaced by this wooden deck; (b) the construction is for an open deck addition without a foundation or basement and without a screened or permanent -type enclosure - this type of construction is not major and will aid the stability of the variable land contours; (c) the relief, as alternatively granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood - the topography of parcels in the immediate area have differences in topography, shape and character in relation to the creek shorelines; (d) the practical difficulties are uniquely related to the property and are not personal to the landowner; (e) the grant of alternative relief, as noted below, will not in turn be adverse to the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of the town, or be adverse to the neighboring properties; Page 3 - Appl. No. 4118 Matter of GLADYS J. MILNE Decision Rendered August 18, 1992 (f) in view of all the above, the interests of justice will be served by granting alternative relief, as conditionally noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Dinizio, it was RESOLVED, to DENY the relief as requested with a setback at one foot from the side property line; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, to GRANT alternative relief with a yard setback from the westerly property line not closer than three feet, and SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The setback from the bulkhead shall not be less than 36+- feet - as exists for the patio and must be landward of the timber retaining walls, as requested; 2. The open deck construction shall remain open and unroofed, and shall not be permitted to be enclosed in any manner; 3. The setback from the westerly side yard shall be not less than three feet; 4. The patio area may be replaced only with wood construction and with no other structural changes - the deck shall be stepped out of wood with no disruption of existing grade; 5. Copy of final construction diagram shall be submitted for review and acceptance by the Z.B.A. Chairman to show set- backs, lot coverage, etc. before issuance of building permit. 6. Lighting must be shielded to the property and shall not create glare to other areas. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Dinizio, and Villa. This resolution was duly adopted. lk RECEIVED AND FILED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK DATE / TOUR g i� Town Clerk, Town of q_outJ.o;d GERARD P. GOEHRIN ER, CHAT ` A�tEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman James Dinizio, Jr, Lydia A. Tortora Lora S, Collins George Horning BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 2, 2000 Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ZBA Fax (516) 765-9064 Telephone (516) 765-1809 Appl. No. 4782 - DANIEL AND MAUREEN MOONEY 1000-37-4-16 MAR 0 6 2000 STREET & LOCALITY: 575 Pine Place, East Marion DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: February 3, 2000 PO thQWTwn Clea FINDINGS OF FACT PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The subject property is known as Lot 145 and part of 146 on the Map of Gardiners Bay Estates, Section 2, Filed Map No. 275. The property has a frontage of 112.93 ft, along Pine Place and Beach Court, lot depth at 78.12 ft. on the east side and 102,40 ft. on the west side. The property consists of 10,298.47 square feet and is improved with a single- family dwelling. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Inspector's January 5, 2000 Notice of Disapproval which states that under Section 100-2448 of the Zoning Code, the proposed deck construction will be less than the required 75 ft. from the existing bulkhead, and will exceed the 20% lot coverage limitation of Section 100-2448. AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicants originally proposed decks 10 feet deep along the front of the house and 16.25 feet deep along the north side, totaling 1144 sq, ft. according to the Notice of Disapproval and resulting in 26% lot coverage. Proposed setbacks from bulkheads were 13 feet at the northwest corner of the house, 19 feet at the north side, 14 feet at the northeast comer, and 47 feet at the east side. At the February 3, 2000 hearing, applicants submitted a revised plan for deck construction of 5 x 12 feet and 10 x 43 ft. (with roof) along the front of the house, and 16 x 24 feet along the north side. These all total 874 sq. ft., resulting in lot coverage of 23.4%. The amended setbacks are 20 feet on the north and 16 feet to the tie line at the closest point on the northeast. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION DESCRIBED BELOW: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspection, the Board makes the following findings: (1) Applicants` lot is only slightly more than 1/4 acre, and is bounded on the north and east by bulkheaded waters. Although the existing house is relatively of modest size, there is little or no room For any sort of expansion without setback and lot coverage variances. The proposed addition of decks to take advantage of the views is impossible without variance relief. (2) The deeper of the proposed decks is located on the north side of the house where it is visible only from the water. The covered deck along the front of the house will extend the front modestly. The neighborhood is made up of generally small lots with generally fairly dense coverage, and the proposed construction will not add to density in a way that would produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or detriment to nearby properties. N, Page 2 - March 2, 2000 Appl, No. 4782 - D. and M. Mooney Southold Town Board of Appeals (3) There is no evidence that grant of the requested variance will have an adverse effect or impact on physical or environmental conditions. The Town Trustees have authorized the proposed construction. (4) Grant of the requested variance is the minimum necessary and adequate to enable applicant to enjoy the benefit of deck additions while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION/ACTION: On motion by Member Collins, seconded by Chairman Goehringer, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT a variance authorizing construction of deck additions as set forth in the revised plan submitted by applicants following the February 3, 2000 hearing. VOTE OF THE BOARD: AYES: Members Goehrin Homing. This Resolution was duly adopted (5-0),,.• GERARD P. GOEHRIP For Filing about 3/6/00 an), Dinizioo,, Tortora, Collins, and ER C APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer George Horning Ruth D. Oliva Vincent Orlando r0l otic !ice Southold Town Hall ® 53095 Main Road ca P.O. Box 1179 V1_ 41 ®! Southold, New York 11971-0959 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 �� Telephone (631) 765-1809 http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS RECEIVED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD /0 r.�?o f� . FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MAY 2 2003 MEETING OF APRIL 17, 2003 Appl, No. 5312 - Nancy Chin/Schlaefer 36tPeold Property Location: 180 Knoll Circle, East Marion; Parcel 1000-37-5-17. SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned, PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's 14,241 sq, ft. parcel has a frontage of 50 feet (radius) along the east side of Knoll Circle in East Marion. The property is Improved with a new foundation for a dwelling, under construction and referred to under the September 19, 2002 Building Permit No. 28754-z. The property is situated along a bulkhead 131.18 in length along Spring Pond, BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's January 9, 2003 Notice of Disapproval, amended January 28, 2003, citing Sections 100-244 and 100- 2394B, in its denial of a building permit for new construction within 10 feet on a single side yard, and within 75 feet of the bulkhead. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on April 17, 2003, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant wishes to construct a new foundation, as an alternative, to renovations and additions to the former dwelling structure, a portion of which is 9.4 ft. from the side property line and a portion of which will be not less than 73 feet to the existing bulkhead. The building and site details are detailed as shown on the maps prepared by Fairweather -Brown Design Associates, Inc. last dated July 20, 2002 (Plans S1, Al -A8, E1), The north and waterside locations of the new foundation are identical to the location of the original house, and the addition to the south is stepped back to increase the formerly established waterside setback. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal Inspections, the Board makes the following findings: Page 2 — April 17, 2003 Appl. No. 5312—N. ChinSchlaefer 37-5-17 at East Marion 1. Grant of the area variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The applicant will retain the pre- existing, non -conforming setbacks noted in the Southold Town Building Dept, Notice -of Disapproval, while constructing a new single family dwelling on the original building footprint. This re -building project will not change the character of the adjacent neighborhood, which has a significant density of developed parcels with similar non- conforming setbacks. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some other method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because the applicant is re -building on a parcel with pre-existing, non- conforming, setbacks from one side yard and a bulkhead, 3. The relief requested is not substantial because the pre-existing, nonconforming setbacks will not change. 4. The difficulty has not been self-created, since this property was already improved with a single family dwelling that had the same setbacks, pre-existing zoning code, which will remain after new construction. 5. No evidence has been submitted to suggest that the proposed additions will have an adverse impact on physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant will comply with the terms and conditions set forth by the Southold Town Board of Trustees in its Wetlands Permit and with regard to the adjacent wetlands, has a Letter of Non -Jurisdiction from the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation, and the new construction will retain the pre-existing, non -conforming setbacks from the side yard and bulkhead on Spring Pond. 6. The relief offered is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a new dwelling, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD; In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Page 3 — April 17, 2003 App). No. 5312 — N. ChinSehlaefer 37-5-17 at East Marion Horning, seconded by Chairwoman Tortora, and duly carried, to GRANT the Variance as applied for and shown on the maps prepared by Fairweather -Brown Design Associates, Inc, last dated July 20, 2002 (Plans S1, Al -A8, E1). This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board; Ayes; Members Tortora (Chairwoman), Horning, and Orlando. (Member Goehringer was absent during this vote; Member Oliva was out-of-state.) This Resolution was duly adopted (3-0). Lydia . Tortora, Chairwoman — Approved for Filing /03 Office Location: Town Annex /First Floor, Capital One Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax (631) 765-9064 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS, AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF JUNE 16, 2009 Mailing Address: 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 RECEIVED N � 'bdd JUN ?.-so JUN 2 c on,q tUJ South n��`elr�C ZBA FILE # 6277 - JOHN and KATHLEEN BERKERY, Applicants PROPERTY LOCATION: 250 Bayview Drive, East Marion CTM 1000-37-4-2 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning Issued its reply stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county -wide or inter -community impact. LWRP: The relief requested under this application is found to be consistent under the policies and standards of Town Code Chapter 268 Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) because the proposed construction will not result in an increase in the existing footprint or increase in the ground area coverage of the single-family dwelling, verified in a letter to the Board of Appeals dated May 12, 2009 prepared by Mark Terry and Scott A. Hilary, LWRP Coordinators. It is also noted that the variance relief requested does not involve features that relate to a regulated natural feature or a bulkhead or other shoreline. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION The subject property is an 8,676 square foot parcel measuring 43,09 feet along Bayview Drive to the north, 203.06 feet along the eastern boundary, 77.48 feet on Spring Pond to the south, and 1.75.00 feet along the western boundary. The lot is improved with a single family house as shown by a sAey prepared by William R. Simmons, 3,d L.S., dated December 3, 2008. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Requests for Variances under Section 280-116 and 280-124, based on the Building Inspector's' January 15, 2009 Notice of Disapproval concerning an application for a building permit to construct additions and alterations to the existing dwelling, The reasons stated for disapproving the application are: (1) a single side yard setback will be less than 10 feet, (2) the combined side yard setbacks will be less than 25 feet, Page 2 — June 16, 2009 ZBA # 6277 - JOHN and KATHLEEN BERKERY CTM 37-4-2 (3) the rear yard setback will be less than 35 feet from the property line, (4) the setback to the bulkhead will be less than the code required minimum of 75 feet, and (5) the percentage of lot coverage on this buildable lot area of 8,676.41 square feet will exceed the code limitation of 20%. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on May 28, 2009, at which times written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE' RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variances to allow a rear porch setback 23.3 feet from the; bulkhead, setbacks from a single side yard at 3.75 feet, and at 8.75 feet combined side yards, and proposed maximum lot coverage of 26.07 percent (based on a lot area of 8,676.41 square feet). REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1, Town Law Section 267-b(3)(b)(1) Grant of the variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The net result of replacing an existing sun room with a new porch shower will not reduce the setback on that side of the house, 2. Town Law Section 267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit of the proposed alterations cannot be achieved by some method, feasible"for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The existing house is nonconforming avid any alterations will require a variance. 3, Town Law Section 267-b(3)(b)(3) The proposed variance is not substantial. There will be a net reduction in lot coverage. Existing setbacks will be maintained except for a one -foot decrease on one side due the construction of a new roof. 4. Town Law Section 267-b(3)(b)(5) The difficulty has not been self created. The existing house is nonconforming, and minor alterations require a variance, 5. Town Law '267-b(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 6. Town Law -X267 -b. Grant of the relief requested is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of the requested construction, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 3 — June 16, 2009 ZBA # 6277 - JOHN and KATHLEEN BERKERY CTM 37-4.2 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-8, a motion was offered by Member Simon, seconded by Member Weisman, and duly carried, to GRANT the variance as applied for, as shown on the site and elevation diagram prepared January 9, 2008 by Mark K. Schwartz, A.I.A. and subject to the condition that: D wells be installed as er code to contain storm -water runoff from the new roof. Any deviation from the variance given such as extensions, or demolitions which are not shown on the applicant's diagrams or survey: site maps, are not authorized under this application when Involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Goehringer airman), Si , Wq' man, an Schn ider. (Member Oliva was absent.) This Resolution was duly opted (4-0). : Ger P. Goehringer, Chairman Proved for Filing 612— Z-/20 1110111111111111 owl ■ I...I ... ... ■ ■ ■ loss mm 10 m jell I . ..� .. u ■ 1 � .� 11� 11� .11 { ■ ■ MINION ■ ■11111■ ■ ■ ■■ MINI .■: ■■ j ■■■l■■■I oil C- ■ ■ ! ! jj,; ■ ■ eeeeeeeeee� I �eeeeeeee� � 11191 111119 II III�11111I11 III I's11eseeessee-ecce e.11s...t.eeoei eoo...lii.11l. seeea lolls 11011 �� ... ! ... ... �_ r �■ ■ ■ 1�� 1❑I � �❑+ � sal 1. ■ � ■ ■! ■ ■ ■ e�� � ■ ■ � ■ I �eeo>. I esu ■ � . ■ j . ■ ■ _ 1�� Uj '�� � wee■ I 1 �_ ■ ■ ■ ■ I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■1T1■ ■ 1:11:::11= ■■■ ■1}11■■1■ ■ : r Is ■■■11111■■■ J X100 e� ',ss .' CGO � 9b , � ^,ya h •o �.e v `�� p0 '� ' m r ' eo ' gip, ,gyp " lf�j 6 , ` `.u. �• 8 a 141 lb 0 � 15.1_ - � r� � t a• 4' s' ti � 0 OC w0V. 57.1 ^1. %\ O .0 25 %p ca s ,t! OO ,� rT y, BpyV1EW x 09- 22 2t q p') a a, b 24 .yh , ,61 a, •!y'` � r€' ,\ \\ � ' i ary r' Y vs 0 � a� ' � .b O _ _ � ': �, h1 o e } � •- � n / ry BAWIEW ' vr. °°' ° rss r 21 _ � � •� �1l .. (_ dr• �Lp � - - - _�r_ - ��"h ` //` " �. . 4'. " 2110, `', 1 m!, r 1 ^ ' ro all l a>r^ ao i R h? ro ' , ,1 p,+ s a F • ; m w _ rte'. d°`m. r \ � , `ONI B ; � �'r,y � i r ' �' ., _ R ' Y / •.."r v �' R 9 $ \lug Or% r Ir '..�,,\ :° ro 1151 ' � `yr'1 ! ml 1�j •a J?�Cj'. Z 3l ,3y rl31 Wiry r R 1 4 p�Og a 1• A(c) ^r ON r . T ; Zt ,' _ i�,y: ,a •,g $�s m °t' 1 �i, tr ,i, 'Y '�' a •^.� au) 1 aw ff ail ' Tc„"ORIENT' 0 TOM of 3 11 wx• ` ! SOUTHOLD SPdng Pond �l 23.2 29 !, ,9 J '`��• ® namcaw,,Tcn wm, �"�,ea> �0) /• HARBOR •t _'"••�..• 17 15.1 t / a3' 7 �l Npnx Ose.e Lx O.ne0.wi5�40KaaPo,>:anEs NOTICE --w-- .evou,nw--raT-- en sn'\En MIVNTENANCE, PLTERATION.fiN.E OR — —.� — ounu.+� � _ — _ Nyrz0. d5lAiallTiON DFgNY P00.TDN OF THE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © JKr�3. E Real Property Tax Service Agency Y CavatYOun,erRi-rh-d.NY1190,T 7 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTYRECORD CARD A A OWNER STREET VILLAGE DIST. SUB. V' LOT f!2, Z,-, --,qz--12 9- o � rv,"� - - e, V; v - 15 r 1-V`-� I Zg V/ Zr 01 b1� ,FORMER OWkERN h,�-3 E ACR.' S w TYPE OF BUILDING ZES. SEAS. VL. FARM COMM. CB. MISC. Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS 00 14��IA40,11.7� 0 4 Z,3 200 6,co 44 C�o ZfL5-0 AGE BUILDING CONDITION NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE FARM Acre Value Per Acre Value Tillable I rillable 2 -illable 3 0 Voodland ;wompland FRONTAGE ON WATER i'rushlancl FRONTAGE ON ROAD louse Plot DEPTH BULKHEAD oto I DOCK DRAIN d� BAYVlTIEV DRIVE SPRING POI\TD SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITUATED AT EAST MARION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK S.C. TAX No. 1000-37-05-07 S.C. TAX No. 1000-37-05-10 SCALE 1 "=20' OCTOBER 13, 2004 AUGUST 10, 2006 FOUNDATION LOCATION OCTOBER 18, 2007 FINAL SURVEY DECEMBER 27, 2007 REVISED NOTES DECEMBER 10, 2014 UPDATE SURVEY AND ADD PROP. DECK TOTAL AREA = 30,099 sq. ff. (TO TIE LINE) 0.691 ac. NOTES: 1. LOT NUMBERS SHOWN THUS: LOT 24 REFER TO MAP OF GARDINER'S BAY ESTATES, ECTION TWO FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUFFOLK COUNTY ON SEPTEMBER 23, 1927 AS FILE No. 275 UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING THE LAND SURVEYOR'S INKED SEAL OR EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED TO BE A VALID TRUE COPY. CERTIFICATIONS INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN ONLY TO THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE SURVEY IS PREPARED, AND ON HIS BEHALF TO THE TITLE COMPANY, GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY AND LENDING INSTITUTION LISTED HEREON, AND TO THE ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDING INSTI— TUTION. CERTIFICATIONS ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE THE EXISTENCE OF RIGHT OF WAYS AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD, IF ANY, NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED. CER TIFIED TO: JOSEPH G. CIAMPA PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR TITLE SURVEYS AS ESTABLISHED BY THE L.I.A.L.S. AND APPROVED AND ADOPTED FOR SUCH USE BY THE NEW YORK STATE LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION. •` t"l,••t r" �.•,':�ot �. (Z:' A.Y.S. Lic. No. 50467