No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-86.-7-9, A OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY 11971 of sor4 "2 �y�OUNVI MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Leslie Weisman, Chair Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: September 26, 2014 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review for BARBARA ADAMS and JAN NICHOLSON (CV) #6792 SCTM#1000-86-7-9 BARBARA ADAMS and JAN NICHOLSON (CV) #6792 - Request for Variances from Article XXII Section 280-116B and Article XXIII Section 280-124 and Section 280-15(F) and the Building Inspector's May 28, 2014, amended July 29, 2014, amended August 4, 2014 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit for partially demolish and relocate an existing single family dwelling as an accessory building, construct a new single family dwelling and construct a new accessory garage, at; 1) less than the code required setback of 75 feet from the bulkhead, 2) less than the code required front yard setback of 40 feet, 3) less than the code required rear yard setback of 40 feet, 4) accessory building in location other than the front (waterfront) or rear yard, 5) accessory garage proposed in a location other than the front (waterfront) or rear yard, located. at: 8100 Indian Neck Lane (adj. to Hog Neck Bay) Peconic, NY. SCTM#1000-86-7-9 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review. of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my determination that the proposed action less to construct a single family dwelling 50' from the concrete wall (less than the code required setback of 75 feet from the bulkhead is INCONSISTENT with the below listed 'LWRP polices and therefore INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. 4.1 Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards A. Minimize potential loss and damage by locating development and structures away from flooding and erosion hazards. T" , 3. Move existing development and structures as far away from flooding and erosion hazards as practical. Maintaining existing development and structures in hazard areas may be warranted for., a. structures which functionally require a location on the coast or in coastal waters. The structure is a private, single family residence and therefore does not require a location on the coast. c. sites where relocation of an existing structure is not practical. The applicant proposes to demo portions of the single family residence and construct a single family residence more seaward and closer to the FEMA Flood Zone VE (velocity hazard) zone than the existing structure. The existing structure is located 142.7' from the high water mark, 99' to the concrete wall and 72' to the top of bluff. The proposed new construction will be located 50' from the concrete wall and 23' to the top of bluff. Figure 1 Subject parcel (White Arrow) The applicant cites several permits that were issued for structures and gives the distance to the high water mark and concrete walls. It is important to note that two actions are comparable to the proposal. In 2014 the Board of Trustees issued a permit (8453) on SCTM# 1000-86-7-8 that approved the razing of an existing single family dwelling and the construction of a single family dwelling 75' from the concrete seawall on the property. The approval required that the dwelling be relocated landward from the original location of the razed structure. _A In 2013 new construction on SCTM#-86-7-6 was also located further landward than the razed dwelling complying with the 75' setback to the bulkhead pursuant to Board of Trustee permit 8293. Since both actions met the 75' setback from the bulkhead the Zoning Board of Appeals did not review the actions. In the event that the action is approved, it is recommended that the structure comply with the 75' setback from the concrete wall to the greatest extent practical to mitigate damage and loss of structures due to storms. Figure 2. Subject parcel in relation to similar actions where dwellings were razed. The LWRP policies fully support the preservation of the Seagyan Club specifically: Policy 2. Preserve historic resources of the Town of Southold. 2.1 Maximize preservation and retention of historic resources. In the event that the action is approved, it is recommended that a perpetual 15' wide LANDSCAPED BUFFER be established landward from the top of bluff. The buffer should be designed to encompass the existing vegetation. Chapter 268 defines a Landscaped Buffer as - A land area of a certain length and width which is planted with indigenous, drought -tolerant vegetation similar to that found within the immediate proximity of the parcel. Maintenance activities within the buffer are limited to removing vegetation which is hazardous to life and property, trimming tree limbs up to a height of 15 feet to maintain viewsheds, replanting of vegetation and establishing a four -foot -wide access path constructed of pervious material for access to the water body. [Added 12-15-2009 by L.L. No. 15-2009] It is further recommended that the LANDSCAPED BUFFER area be staked prior to any construction on-site. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Stephen Kiely, Assistant Town Attorney Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 6 g - 7 - / The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): ;.6,q aAtW— Town Board © Planning Dept. E Building Dept. El Board of Trustees 0 Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital 0 construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: u �,�, 54ayar)_C/ Location of action: flD O -ric Site acreage: G BOO 0O Present land use: a, Present zoning classification: �- 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: 4 �AZ'W / s ��� Gp n /14 !�?�SO/7.IJ ut-chCar�i� (b) Mailing address: (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( ) 0�o /�� /Hoole 7[P — i E3 o (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No M If yes, which state or federal agency?. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III – Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III – Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria IMYes ❑ No ❑ Not Annlicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Pd Yes © No Q Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria F&KI-IMMKI-0-00 ■! Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria Yes 0 No ONot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes E] Noo Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. © Yes 0 No 0 Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No IM Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. VSYeAD No ❑ Not Applicable Ol/A Crrnz/5 1701 a%ocP- Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water -dependent uses and promote siting of new water -dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No �d Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. 0 Yes 1:1No NaNot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No �, Not Applicable Created on 512510511:20 AM Office Location: Town Annex /First Floor, Capital One Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 August 18, 2014 http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax (631) 765-9064 Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Southold, NY 11971 Mailing Address: 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. #6792 Adams, Barbara & Nicholson, Jan (CV) Dear Mark: We have received an application to partially demolish and relocate an existing single family dwelling as an accessory building, construct a new single family dwelling, and construct an accessory garage. A copy of the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval under Chapter 280 (Zoning Code), and survey map, project description form, are attached for your reference. Your written evaluation with recommendations for this proposal, as required under the Code procedures of LWRP Section 268-513 is requested within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Thank you. Very truly yours, FORM NO.3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: May 28, 2014 AMENDED: July 29, 2014 AMENDED: August 4, 2014 TO: Patricia Moore (Adams) 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Please take notice that your application dated May 13, 2014 For permit to partially demolish and relocate an existing single family dwelling as an accessory building, construct a new single family dwelling, and construct an accessory garage at Location of property: 8100 Indian Neck Lane, Peconic County Tax Map No. 1000 — Section 86 Block 7 Lot 9 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction on this non -conforming 33,145 square foot lot in the R-80 District is not permitted pursuant to Article XXII, Section 280-11613, which states, "All buildings located on lots upon which a bulkhead, concrete wall, riprap or similar structure exists five (75) feet from the bulkhead." which states that, on lots measuring between 20,000 and 39,999 square feet in total size, the minimum front Yard setback is 40 feet and the minimum rear yard setback is 40 feet. Following the proposed construction, the new single family dwelling will have a front yard setback of +/- 29 feet and a rear yard setback of +/- 16 feet. Furthermore, the relocation and conversion to an accessory building (Seguin Club Building) and the construction of an accessory_ garage is not permitted pursuant to Section 280-15F, which states; "In the case of a waterfront parcel, accessory buildings and structures may be located in the front yard, provided that such buildings and structures meet the front -yard setback requirements set forth by this code." Both proposed accessory buildings are noted as being located in the side yard. This Notice of Disapproval was amended on July 29 and August 4, 20 to corrt errors. / \ Signature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require Southold Town Building Department. CC. -file, Z.B.A. APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS ee $$ Filed By: Date Assigned/Assignment No. E$ lice Notes• House No. 8100 Street Indian Neck Lane Hamlet Peconic SCTM 1000 Section 86 Block 7 Lots) 9 Lot Size 33.145 sq.ft. Zone R-80 I (WE) APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED August 4,2014 -BASED ON MAP (site plan prepared by Robert G. Madey, Architect dated May 8, 2014, as amended May 27, 2014) Applicant(s)/Owner(s): Barbara Adams, and Jan Nicholson (contract vendee) Mailing Address:_(BA) P.O.Box 1642, Southold, NY 11971 (JN) 419 East 50' Street, NY NY 10022 Telephone: c/o Pat Moore- 765-4330 Fax #: 765-4643 Email: pcmoore@mooreattys.com NOTE: In addition to the above, please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney, agent, architect, builder, contract vendee, etc. and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative: Patricia C. Moore Esq. for ( X ) Owner, or (X ) Other: Contract Vendee Agents Address: 51020 Main Road, Southold NY 11971 Telephone 765-4330 Fax #: 765-4643 Email:_ pcmooreQmooreattys.com Please check box to specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to, from the above names: ❑ Applicant/Owner(s), or E Authorized Representative, or ❑ Other Name/Address below: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED MAP DATED May 27, 2014 and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED May 13, 2014 FOR: E Building Permit ❑ Certificate of Occupancy ❑ Pre -Certificate of Occupancy ❑ Change of Use ❑ Permit for As -Built Construction ❑Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article, Section, Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code.) Article XXII Section 280- 116 Subsection B (Setback from Bulkhead) 50' Article XXIII Section 280-124 (front yard & rear yard setback required 40'- House at 29' and rear yard 16' Waterfront Property: Accessory structures in a side yard not front yard/rear yard Seagyan Club building and garage in "side yard" Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ❑ A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law -Section 280-A. ❑ Interpretation of the Town Code, Article _Section ❑ Reversal or Other A prior appeal E has, ❑ has not been made at any time with respect to this property. UNDER Appeal No. Year_ (Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our office for assistance.) Appeal #4406 9/19/96 (existing shed) Name of Owner: Adams & Nicholson ZBA File # REASONS FOR APPEAL (additional sheets may be used with preparer's signature): AREA VARIANCE REASONS.- (1) EASONS. (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties if granted, because: Little Peconic Bay from Richmond Creek to Little Creek has a generous and very walkable beach, even at high tide. The neighborhood, for the purpose of this variance request, is considered to be the row of beachfront properties stretching over a quarter mile west from Richmond Creek. (See Bayfront Survey prepared by Howard Young dated July 10, 2014.) This neighborhood is dominated by properties with setbacks that do not conform. Eight of the eleven properties, other than the subject, 73%, do not conform. These eight properties have an average setback from their bulkheads of 54 feet. The variance application for the subject is for 50 feet back, only slightly below the average setback distance to the bulkhead. The subject property as proposed, however, is situated at a greater distance than the average to the High Water Mark (HWM). The subject building is proposed at 92 feet back from the HWM, compared to an average of 77 feet back from the HWM of the other eight homes that do not conform. The paradox occurs because the bulkhead line is irregular: among the non- conforming properties, one property has less than 5 feet between the bulkhead and the HWM, while three properties, including the subject property, have over 40 feet between the bulkhead and the HWM. The distance from the bulkhead is not necessarily a telling indication for the distance a house is to the water in this neighborhood dominated by a long, walkable beach. Among the three conforming properties in the row, one has the same HWM setback, one is slightly more at 100 feet, and one is so far back (@300 feet) that it is not even perceived as a bayfront house. The setback variance requested would position the house conservatively back from the water in the context of all the houses in the neighborhood, those that conform and those that do not. Excepting the house that is entirely out of sight, only two houses would have a greater HWM setback --by a mere 8 feet --and one other house would be equal. Every other house is closer to the water. (See the analysis of the Bayfront survey.) Club, and the applicant wishes to preserve that portion of the historic structure and locate it closer to the road at the north end of the property in order to display the structure with Southold-Peconic historic and cultural significance. The applicant sees the charm of the original structure and wishes to preserve it. See: History of Seagyan Club, attached as Exhibit A; photographs attached as Exhibit B. The location of the accessory structures in the "side yard" is in a practical sense the rear yard of the waterfront parcel. The property was originally created and planned as a deep and narrowing parcel. The configuration of the parcel, as it was created, is to have the house face the waterfront and the accessory structures be located landward of the house. As can be seen from the Howard Young survey, all the homes along Peconic Bay are similarly developed with the homes facing the water and the accessory structures located landward of the homes. The proposed design is for the entrance to be between the house and the garage, as a courtyard entrance, maximizing the privacy from Indian Neck Lane. While Indian Neck Lane and the westerly property line is the technical "front" and "rear" yard (pursuant to the building code definition), neither the existing structures nor the proposed structures follow the town code "front yard"or "rear yard" definition. The physical location for structures on this waterfront parcel, logically and practically, are for the north end of the parcel to be the "front" yard. The code allows accessory structures to be placed in the "front yard" of waterfront lots. No waterfront parcel would logically construct a house which does not benefit from the waterfront views. To conform to the front and rear yard code definition would be undesirable and impractical since the lot narrows to 90' in "depth" on the north end and 324' in "width" running the length of Indian Neck Lane. A wide but narrow house would devalue the property and be out of character to the surrounding community. Such a design would be offensive to the owner, contract vendee, and an unwelcome design on Indian Neck Road. The seaward end of Indian Neck Lane is sparsely developed along the road. The area is wooded and the homes along the water are served by long dirt driveways. The subject property has a small house which has deteriorated over the years. A new house will be comparable to other architecturally designed homes facing the water. (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: The house faces the waterfront and enjoys views of the Peconic Bay. The front door faces an interior courtyard created between the proposed garage and the proposed house. The two structures are set back from Indian Neck Lane as far from the road as is practical. The original portion of the Seagyan Club will be preserved and relocated as an accessory building, as is shown on the site plan. All other structures will be demolished. Placing the house 50' from the bulkhead would provide enough room at the north end of the property to accommodate the Seagyan Club structure; the proposed setbacks will enhance the property, provide room for the structures to be landscaped, maintain privacy, and distinguish the Club from the other buildings (house and garage). The Seagyan club should be close to the street to have the maximum visual impact. While it is proposed at 11'8"1/4 feet from the property line, in the "side yard", it is proposed 30' from the Town's road. Pushing the structure back, away from the road, would make the structure less visually accessible for the public to enjoy. The applicant's intention is to share this structure with the Southold Town community. Her intentions would be frustrated by placement of the Seagyan building in any location other than the proposed location (side yard) and conforming "front yard" setback from the road. To be conforming to the Town's setbacks (40' code + 18' Town right of way) would have the Seagyan Club at 58' from the road. The Seagyan club would not be accessible for public view and would interfere with the placement of the residential structures. Without the requested variance, the preservation of the structure would not be practical, therefore it would not be preserved. This would be the loss of a remnant of Southold's cultural history. (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: The lot is preexisting nonconforming in size and dimensions. The lot is 33,145 sq.ft. in an R-80 (80,000 sq.ft. Zoning Use District). The parcel would be constrained by greater setbacks from Peconic Bay and the bulkhead, and the Zoning code designated "front" and "rear" yard at the narrowest point of the lot. The proposed setbacks of the house and location of the accessory structures is consistent with the relief granted to similarly developed parcels in the neighborhood. (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effector impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: The proposed setbacks from the bulkhead are equivalent to the setbacks approved by the ZBA and Planning Board over the years. The property has no environmental conditions which prevent the proposed appeal from being granted. The setback to the HWM is proposed at 92'. The property is the last house on its side of Indian Neck Lane which dead ends at Peconic Bay. The road has limited traffic due to the private nature of the neighborhood. Public access to the Creek and a boat ramp is north of the subject property, significantly landward ( more than 1000 feet landward)of the waterfront residences along Peconic Bay. See Exhibit C - Google Map showing location of Boat Ramp. The location of the accessory structures in the "side" yard have no adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or the district. (5) Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? ( )Yes, or ( X )No The location of the new house, garage and relocated accessory structure (Seagyan Club) require variances due to the size, shape, and location of the parcel on Peconic Bay and the location of the parcel at the end of the road. This parcel is unique on Indian Neck Lane as a waterfront and road front parcel. When this lot was created the placement of a house was facing Peconic Bay, as are all the waterfront homes to the west. The proposed house will continue to face Peconic Bay. Are there Covenants and Restrictions concerning this land: E No. Yes ( please furnish co Also, previously approved variances issued to neighboring homes along Peconic Bay granted 50' setbacks of the homes from the bulkhead; moreover, the Planning Board has similarly imposed 50' setbacks as conditions of the adjacent subdivisions. The following setbacks of neighboring properties are described in Southold Town records: 1980 Subdivision of High House Woods (west of Adams property) was developed by Samuel B. Prellwitz. (Tax Map Now 1000-86-7-7.1(with existing house), 7.2(with building setbacks), 7.3 and 7.4). The subdivision established building setbacks as 50' from top of bank (which is now a bulkhead)& 100' setback from top of bank for wells & sanitary. The 1980 subdivision was designed with a 50' setback from the top edge of the bank along the shoreline (now bulkhead). The subdivision waterfront lots did not have bulkheads when the subdivision was approved however the bulkhead line can be seen on the property to the west of the subdivision (Fischer Property) as the line the Planning Board used to establish setbacks of the homes. • Dawson Property(Now Wendell): 86-7-7.2: Zoning Board Appeal #6101 dated 1/10/08 approved the house & deck 42.3 from bulkhead. • 1000-86-7-8 Nina Fischer Zoning Board approval appeal #2883 dated 12/1/81 to construct an addition to an existing dwelling in 1981: Zoning Board variance for a side yard setback from 23' to 14'. The existing house is 57.4' from the bulkhead • 1000-98-6-1: Riccio (Existing House@50' from bulkhead) The existing house was demolished and Zoning Board approved Appeal #6140 7/24/2008 a new house at 50' from bulkhead and swimming pool in a side yard • 1000-86-7-2.2 Ruth Miller (Existing House- ZBA granted variance Appeal #4550 4/30/98 for addition in side yard @50' to bulkhead • 1000-86-7-2.1 Scopaz: 41' from Bulkhead ZBA approved Appeal #6329 12/22/09: Additions and alterations (large expansion of existing dwelling) to existing single family dwelling: Variance from bulkhead: 42.9' As can be seen from the above actions, as well as from the bayfront Howard Young survey, the character of the homes along the water are houses located 50' from the bulkhead. As to front yard setbacks from Indian Neck Lane: The house and garage are set back as far from the road as is practical given the dimensions of the property. The lot is narrow ( 90') and deep( 324.84); moreover, the lot is wedge shaped, 111' wide at 50' back from the bulkhead. The location of the structures would need to comply with front yard setbacks of 40' from the road and a 75' setback from the bulkhead. This compresses the design of the house and adversely impacts the architectural style desired by the applicants and the stately design of the surrounding neighbors. The original center portion of the existing house had been at one time the historic Seagyan This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the community. Check this box ( ) IFA USE VARIANCE IS BEING REQUESTED, AND PLEASE COMPLETE THE ATTACHED USE VARIANCE SHEET: (Please be sure to consult your attorney.) ature of Appellant or Authorized Agent (Agent must submit written Authorization from Owner) Sworn to before me this IS of August, 2014. BETSY A. PERMNS Notary Public, State of New York No. 01 PE6130636 Qualified in Suffolk Coun Commission Expires July 18,-�- APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Serge Doyen James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Lydia A. Tortora BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Appeal #1-106 ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Southold Thwn Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1809 September 19, 1996 APPLI(;ANT. BARBARA ADAMS SUBJECT PROPERTY: 8100 Indian Neck Lane, Peconic. 1000-86-7-9. 11ASIS OF APPEAL: Notice of Disapproval issued by the Building Inspector dated July 18, 1996: "...Accessory buildings and uses shall be located in fbe recluirecl rear yard; Article 11I, Section 100-33 .... " RELil:le REQUESTED: To locate an existing "as built" accessory shed of a size approximately 10 ft. by 14 ft. in a side area (instead of the required rear ,yard or required front ,yard on this waterfront parcel.) The setbacks as exist are approximately 24 feet from the northerly property line and approximately 30 fact from the closest front property line (along Indian Neck Road). MU`l,ION MADE BY: James Dinizio, Jr.. SECONDED BY: Serge Doyen. A(;110WRESOLUTION AU vrm: Granted "as built", with electric utilities. (Nate.: Applicant will be returning for final reviews and obtain ether required approvals (i.e. Building Permit and Certificate of occupancy) from the Building Inspector's Office.) REASONS/ FINDINGS: This is an area variance request based upon the dimen- sional configuration of the property. The Board finds that location of this shed is not unreasonable for the following reasons: a) the front yard area is limited in size and although the code may provide for location of a shed in a front. yard area for waterfront parcels, it must also meet a principal setback; b) when locating the shed at a required front yard principal setback, the shed is placed on this site in the "side yard", necessitating this application; c) there will not be an undesirable change produced in the character of the neighborhood or detriment to nearby properties - there is suitable screening, the building is not substantial in size, and its purpose is to store items in an enclosed building area, which in itself is desirable and necessary as an accessory to the applicant's residence on this site; d) to locate the shed in any other area would not be more beneficial; e) although the difficulty was self-created, it does not preclude the granting of the arc>a variance; f) this is the minimum variance necessary under the circumstances, and the health, safety and welfare of the community will not be adversely affected by its location near the required distance for if allowed in the established front setback; g) due to the angle of the sight lines & the easterly line, the yard areas are shifted from what may be rear yard for other parcels similar in size and shape throughout the town. VOTE. OF TIIE BOARD: Ayes: Members Serge J. Doyen, James Dinizio, Jr., Robert A . Villa, Lydia A. Tortora, Gerar Goeh ' This resolution was unanimously adopted 5-0. Approved for Filing 9/24196 Gerard P P. Goehringer, Chairmafi RECEIVED AND FILED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CLEftiK DATE-al-ARL:r HQUI r 11:00 Town Clerk, Town of Southold Analysis of Bayfront Survey by Young & Young on July 10, 2014, for Twelve Properties West of Richmond Creek on Hog Neck Bay (Little Peconic Bay) Setbacks from Bulkhead and High Water Mark (in feet) Section/block/lot Conforming (75') Versus Not Conforming Distance, House to Bulkhead Distance, Bulkhead to HWM Total Distance, House to HWM 86 6 26.1 Not No bulkh'd 50 PROPOSED 8679 50 42.1 92.1 86 7 7.2 Not 42.3 41.6 83.9 86 7 7.1 Not 70.9 16.2 87.1 86 7 8 Not 57.4 42.4 99.8 86 7 6 Pictured house razed. New one is Conforming 100 86 7 5.1 Conforming 92.3 86 7 5.2 Conforming -300 86 7 4.3 Not 70.9 4.7 75.6 98 6 1 Not 49.4 25.7 75.1 86 7 2.2 Not 44.1 27.1 71.2 86 7 2.1 Not 47.1 25.8 72.9 Average of Not conforming properties excl proposed) 54.0* 77.0 *50', the distance from the house to wetlands, used for property 86 6 26.1. BOARD OF APPEALS ELEVATION :")x_11 -7/SZ" PLAN NICHOLSON RESIDENCE 8190 INDIAN NECK LANE PECONIC, NEW YORK Robert G. Madey Architects GARAGE PLANS 1/8'=1'-0° SM MAY 8, 2014 7� TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OPERTY RECORD CARS ��� �.-3� OWNER ;: STREET VILIrAGE DISTRICT SUB. LOT gg��,k�o, Ada n -s c - FORMER OWNER N ,_ P EA REAGE so ` ,CSS dcirrls Sdry/ TYPE OF BUILDING RES. Z SEAS. VL. FARM COAW- . I IND. CB. I MISC. LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS Q 6 o a i2/ � - /W.? ^ 7 . �o �,f► /*��a�1 -Lillla ,. s �P er �.Y ►`:' G s is sty q .,�a ont qt n.-8 5=� 2-700 z©o a # Sh AGE BUILDING CONDITION NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE Form Acre Value Per Acre Value 4 Ove/ _ o o Tillable 1 Tillable 2 76 c Tillable, 3 Woodland " Swampland Brushland House Plot Tota I .`;' ` ::i rte'* �.: �" � _ � ... NO. 075 FOR PCL. NO. FOR PCL. NO. SEE SEC. NO. SEE SEC. NO. 075-06-007.2 075-06-006.1 z9 a n 510 31 5.2A(c) SEE SEC. NO, 075 LINE 3.1 71A(c) wt`/ 32 3.1A Oda mS Nida)go (CV) 1 � 36 3.3 R i fns. 26.4 I = 82 4A(c) TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �i ry x TOWN OF SOUTHOLD � � 4p 1 ppIDF/IpIlr9xuFaa \ Q 13 t / ' '27 t0.0A(c) .� CREEK D- i3 \\ ii 10 11 SEE SEC. NO. 075 r'd FOR PCL. NO ` SEE SEC. NO. FOR PCL NO 075-WOEC SEE SEC NO 075-07-006.1 ��i�4., SEE SEC. NO, 075 LINE 3.1 71A(c) wt`/ 32 3.1A Oda mS Nida)go (CV) 1 � 36 3.3 R i fns. 26.4 I = 82 4A(c) TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �i ry x TOWN OF SOUTHOLD � � 4p 1 ppIDF/IpIlr9xuFaa \ Q 13 t / ' '27 t0.0A(c) .� CREEK D- i3 \\ ii 1 5Pl 22 3cl a 1w 2A 19 IP 1.1A 4.1 .te ? 1 7A 5.2 5.1 1 6A 1.6 9plA Sri 4.2 °v t.8A NE '. I E � r 26.2 5AA(c) ate 7.3 1.3A F x1 7.2 1.6A(c) 7.1 O as 3 0 MATCH L N nl SEE SEC. NO. 096 43 19A MATCH — LNE SEE SEC NO 099 �.* K COUNTY OF SUFFOLKNOTICE © Real Property Tax Service Agency y IMINTENANCE.ALTERATION. SALE OR hI: Property OISTRI9UIT N OFANY PORTION OF TME 'u'� County Center Riverhead, N Y 11801 M SUFFOU(CWNTY TP%NAP IS PROHIBREO."-„-jl. xti SCPLE IN FEET p0 A WTNOUT MITTEN PERMISSION OFTNE 1,.,it;'.,•„ 0 P REAL PROPERTY TM SERVICE AGENCY-- m TOINNOF SOUTHOLD aex �9 VILLAGE OF 133 DISTRICTNO 1000 099 CANVEpSION DATE JJ 01. ]011 N 319.092 SECTION NO PROPERTY R '7 MAP 10 11 t B 9 30 6 5 n M 5 18 1 Y 16 d CI � .1 1A t' 2P e1e1O1gN FOR PCE NO SEE SEC NO 09&05017 S 1 5Pl 22 3cl a 1w 2A 19 IP 1.1A 4.1 .te ? 1 7A 5.2 5.1 1 6A 1.6 9plA Sri 4.2 °v t.8A NE '. I E � r 26.2 5AA(c) ate 7.3 1.3A F x1 7.2 1.6A(c) 7.1 O as 3 0 MATCH L N nl SEE SEC. NO. 096 43 19A MATCH — LNE SEE SEC NO 099 �.* K COUNTY OF SUFFOLKNOTICE © Real Property Tax Service Agency y IMINTENANCE.ALTERATION. SALE OR hI: Property OISTRI9UIT N OFANY PORTION OF TME 'u'� County Center Riverhead, N Y 11801 M SUFFOU(CWNTY TP%NAP IS PROHIBREO."-„-jl. xti SCPLE IN FEET p0 A WTNOUT MITTEN PERMISSION OFTNE 1,.,it;'.,•„ 0 P REAL PROPERTY TM SERVICE AGENCY-- m TOINNOF SOUTHOLD aex �9 VILLAGE OF 133 DISTRICTNO 1000 099 CANVEpSION DATE JJ 01. ]011 N 319.092 SECTION NO PROPERTY R '7 MAP , ��(�� ,`, F sY .'`` ; 4�� � r�� 'icy. � • a � .. ., J� - w �° "a a J• a,; r �atRr` "'. �.. `� [�� ' 1 '�' j5 � � r l , riy •. , � a .. . yy . A - ,yt _`L-,{ sy ����.���. ,.� }ter � xt\ay�''�'L ! . • g.��. . � r 11 `� � ` T" �_ `s'� � •• `.� -}•' �, ,� � � �Tf� i Fey ♦ _ � ,,,. -e� � C,. iS et,+A �'' e!° J t x , .. f. i ".fit ♦ .H p, ` � ♦ i.� i� - � 4 • r. � �� �i a.•.. -�� airl ,. 9y - t, - r' m i�%�`� `F ♦�9ri � �FI`q.+ 'ija `•[' �. ' +' �i t. a. v. "tY,-0. f' '4frf ��.r -i• E.T� _J.P�, r ,t `;! �, tl aF s+n ,�- ♦ X ,p1y .a r i S}_},! n t r pat« i { 4p I � Nth 10 �t -0111 , r _n. � `,� j%yam w !!rte � '"" .� � � rs t -y-, s '. �a» F��� � -�F at � �S �j � i �Y �� .� � >�„ r . �.�.v. � y, _ `� �� �' � �.- �,.; ,: p{ �' � ,. � M1 '�� i; E � i:: _ _ T 4 � � 1 � ' �§ $ v � i t � ,;; + _. I 1Ay n,.... F> l s ' .. I �' .. f ri -- s--- , _. ...i c .�u � � y; �� ' - ° � t X � �'�. �.�� ---- _� f �. --___ .,- .. . � 6 4,, ,.. � .. - ..a, .� .. • r- _ �O � ��, _ - _ °c * . ., < �� �iw_ .S�$�, #•��` .ter.. 41 51 r , iLi ` -- 1 i g } '�i.`'7.y;' .i, i� ` i, y�' r ". -� y` �t� !a i'„� -- ems, t•. ��} >, -tit Y � ,. � ` � -t ' - " " yy iiee �• 11,. - ( � i ! 'jylr ♦ �1-. yds ��Siii'K �j�.,'7��ir ��. �.. � /♦ - •, . j y .� ..'y 5.. " 'i� 5y, 4 f .:{9! 9 �� I' s t Tia ECK LA l S yy11958 1 �i r �' 'i F,r�^►; `, C .sem vS� r ��L ++► i',..'� '� ��ti�� �-x�j�. >• � t R j�-�; �( may: �9p .� is Now. 110 �' all PU 9 h .rte!\ y\ ON♦Aot Fill Ilk YZ l t r r k F w a 1 v ff ,y_ ��,•i+ [s '* ,y'� � d e�� y;2. ri• \�'� �; �.' _ its'. \4 "� ,` F '. y: 1. ,,���. � r ..( -•5�._ _ � �`, t is j •r�l�:• i' r,� .f _ 1 _ i7�..x c? �3 . S _ F+ .`f�F Na la"\�,\� %� � ati'fi�� Cy�T•,���la t,\�, +'� F • \ A t.,, e, 7j Y, y.�/,`�i^- .. .:. :r~. _. \..•y`p[r` i _ NN .: f :" • '-���."�S`�fr �\Y+ 1�3 �4`- � 5� T� �i' �u1�� '�� z� 7� xsv1 8100 INDIAN NECK LA _ ;.. I 9�:.i _ "^.:.. _:•. `� +"� 1�� � ,'LlJ-:�\ �I ': }�v ' �' rjr1i.C'p',�� a a +�t�(' w`e � a '�•1�, - �, f����.(1 �r # �r_ ': ��f Lr�, ;��, y ° �,�G, (_� �`� 7t,+\ � t �� F� "yy>< y+�{4 � r\ �Y�s � � �. ` •t, . ,•y,/r � �R.+Rtr?.f. � �~�'.'•�A�.•�, � y_ \ -- i st�C'• �{.:, t` ��3\ ..tt�r \�`r F`F,:� t�-�rs MTI � .s� .c ° / , �." i��° �'• \ � � y' � r � ± rite � C tl =.`�, �y ,� �� „y r'S r` f � �, f��i;F�i t 7-9 PECONIC NY • • 11958 SCTM: 1000�_• 1 . Ij -.'/� r�.Y� �-�,'�`_.1 �'v�,?� "Q a - C ��•i \�,` Rn. •, �+'i= �5;:. 4 a'°�`���-"- 1i�` ' • ', �t .Z y\ _ - `,� '� \ '!�� l \ sty y,., ;. ?',.: ^,a. .�.� � � of �i ..✓. a ��t•. rr`'-A .a. �.� ' `� � �� � �� •. �.,.,� .�•r .. WIN �q 4 , n ^ I - SCTM: 1000-86-7-9 8100 INDIAN NECK LA PECONIC NY 11958 > r t ay s 4,- • .\ yrs' Pt" c, ' • P ."- •} 4 a v, -A •J ',ir ��►��' a:� .1 tai i'`1�18R '-� ��+ ✓ Vie• �r q: g f�� ty 'Ilk ♦t ';�1►/�/��y Ii .�i ��r'r �� �1 r , r • j ♦� .nJ 030 51, 4.p v •}" a A+ 1y�xf� iS v q9 p t f: 00 do Ma., v AM f SO* y I _1�r^� a 7• *.+; �1�✓1.. M + MAI ` f i� ^'�'N .,� L'�`: + A ir*�i�= J• �' P" Ur 14, 140 �-• � . N J T i r a s r ,�` A�• Y L �• . • .a �y iw— x � f} f ,. • ti�:�� fat° ��<�, �; � a ♦ (w� ' Yee ;�r §"� i-� 1 l ,�j i t } - 5 _�...�� t' NI I M k: FORM No. 4 TowN or SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall Southold, N.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No Z-25262 Date SEPTEMBER 11, 1997 THIS CERTIFIES that the building AOCSSSORY Location of Property noo nwim NECK LANN PECONIC N.Y. House No. street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 86 Block 7 Lot 9 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated SEPTEMBER 27. 1997 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 23715-Z dated SEPTEMBER 24, 1996 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ACCESSORY STMUWB SHED IN BIDE YARD AS APPLIED FOR & AS PER Zea #4406. The certificate is issued to BARBARA ADAMS (owner) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL N/A CERTIFICATE NO. N/A PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED N/A " � , �- /"t � 1dy g Inspector Rev. 1/91 z iz # £ti9b99L : bZ:E�:tip-5�-80 No 5-25263 FORM N0. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT office of the Building inspector Town Hall Southold, N.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Date SEPTEMBER 11, 1997 THIS CERTIFIES that the building ADDITION Location of Property 8100 INDIAN NECK LANE PECDNiC, N.Y. House No. Street Hamlet County Tax May No. 1000 Section 86 Block 7 Lot 9 subdivision Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated AUGUST 26, 1996 pursuant to which Building permit No. 23689-z dated SIiPmuzR 24, 1996 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is DECK ADDITION TO EXISTING ONE _FAMILY DWELLING AS APPLIED FOR The certificate is issued to BARBARA ADAMS (owner) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL N/A UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. N/A PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED N/A t ` u' di g Inspector Rev. 1/81 � /� # Eti9ti59L � Z£�El�til-91-80 AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WHEN TO USE THIS FORM: This form must be completed by the applicant for any special use permit, site plan approval, use variance, area variance or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district OR within 500 feet of a farm operation located in an agricultural district. All applications requiring an agricultural data statement must be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance with Section 239m and 239n of the General Municipal Law. 1. Name of Applicant:�ii9s 2. Address of Applicant: 3. Name of Land Owner (if other than Applicant): 4. Address of Land Owner: 5. Description of Proposed Project:-- &� , .ice. 6. Location of Property: (road and Tax map 77number) LOOD l-7- 7. . Is the parcel within 500 feet o a farm operation? { ) Yes { ) No 8. Is this parcel actively farmed? ( ) Yes { ) No 9. Name and addresses of any owner(s) of land within the agricultural district containing active farm operations. Suffolk County Tax Lot numbers will be provided to you by the Zoning Board Staff, it is your responsibility to obtain the current names and mailing addresses from the Town Assessor's Office. (765-1937) or from the Real Property Tax Office located in Riverhead. NAME and ADDRESS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (Please use the back of this page if there are additional property owners) Signature of Applicant Date Note: 1. The local Board will solicit comments from the owners of land identified above in order to consider the effect of the proposed action on their farm operation. Solicitations will be made by supplying a copy of this statement. 2. Comments returned to the local Board will be taken into consideration as part as the overall review of this application. 3. Copies of the completed Agricultural Data Statement shall be sent by applicant to the property owners identified above. The cost for mailing shall be paid by the Applicant at the time the application is submitted for review. 617.20 Appendix B Short Environmental Assessment Form Instructions for Completing Part 1 - Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1- Project and Sponsor Information � 64,y4:&nJ s 4 Qjo 5 b Name of Action or Project: 4a 7rnv1 /V&,) �&vse e r� �a� Project Location (describe, and attach a locatio map): no o mid Brief Description Description of Proposed Action: Am(,o c l.w%e�J) /Vetv Cj��c 7e /'% &"" Ve, v Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Cc Telephone: '76,J-- 5/3 3 Q E -Mail: G1Y10O/� E' /LidQ7Z` S Address: City/PO: Stat/V/ zip �77/ 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, NO YES administrative rule, or regulation? If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES X If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval: -;_7 64- �! tUS�-� 3.a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? , �' acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? O acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on, adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑ Urban ❑ Rural (non -agriculture) ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial Residential (suburban) ❑ Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic ❑ Other (specify): ❑ Parkland Page 1 of 4 L077j 5. Is the proposed action, a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? NO YES N/A X X 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? NO YES 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes, identify: /-��oxt.G NO YES 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? b. Are public transportation service(s) available at or near the site of the proposed action? c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? NO YES A X X, 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: NO YES 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? If No, describe method for providing potable water: NO YES x 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: u"p�� NO YES X 12. a. Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic Places? � QST ?/?Jd441r*1K b. Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? NO YES X v 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency? b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: NO YES X X 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: Ff Shoreline ❑ Forest ❑ Agricultural/grasslands ❑ Early mid -successional Ig Wetland ❑ Urban Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? NO YES x 16. Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain?W'�A 7CAM L111177—Ifes NO YES >C1 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non -point sources? If Yes, a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? KNO ❑ YES b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)? If Yes, briefly describe: ❑ NOV YES NO I YES Page 2 of 4 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of water or other liquids (e.g. retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)? If Yes, explain purpose and size: 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste management facility? If Yes, describe: 20. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: NO YES NO YES NO YES X I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Q �1 Applicant/sponsor na 1 a t-od >`e Date: Signature: Part 2 - Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept "Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" Page 3 of 4 No, or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit, biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a. public / private water supplies? b. public / private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic, archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources (e.g., wetlands, waterbodies, groundwater, air quality, flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 Part 3 - Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and cumulative impacts. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Date Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 No, or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion, flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3 - Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and cumulative impacts. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Date Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 Jan Nicholson 419 East 50`h Street New York NY 10022 April 8, 2014 Patricia C. Moore 51020 Main Road Southold NY 11971 Dear Ms. Moore: I, Jan Nicholson, as contract vendee of property located on 8100 Indian Neck Lane, Peconic, New York (sctm: 1000-86-7-9) hereby authorize you to act as my agent regarding any and all applications with the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals, Board of Trustees, the NYS DEC, and any other agencies. /L -145—n- u o chol –on7� Barbara Adams PO Box 1642 Southold, NY 11971-0941 April Zt , 2014 Patricia C. Moore 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Moore: I, Barbara Adams, owner & seller of property located on 8100 Indian Neck Lane, Peconic, New York, (sctm: 1000-86-7-9) hereby authorize you to act as my agent regarding any and all applications—where Jan Nicholson is the intended purchaser of the property—with the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals, Board of Trustees, the NYS DEC, and any other agencies. Very truly yours, Barbara Adams APPLICANT TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM (FOR SUBMISSION BY OWNER and OWNER'S AGENT) take YOUR NAME: APAM, BARBARA AS OWNER/SELLER AND MOORE, PATRICIA (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person or company name.) NATURE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax Grievance Variance �C Special Exception If "Other", name the activity: Change of Zone Approval of Plat Exemption from Plat or Official Map Other Trustees X Do you personally, (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the Town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the Town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO_X Complete the balance of this form and date and sign below where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold: Title or position of that person: Describe that relationship between yourself (the applicant) and the Town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A through D (below) and/or describe the relationship in the space provided. The Town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply): A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non -corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this/!Fe/,- day of/ Q� ar ara Adams atricia C. Moore APPLICANT TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM (FOR SUBMISSION BY OWNER and OWNER'S AGENT) The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of Town officers and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide information, which can alert the Town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: NICHOLSON JAN AS CONTRACT VENDEE AND MOORE, PATRICIA (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person or company name.) NATURE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax Grievance Variance Special Exception If "Other", name the activity: Change of Zone Approval of Plat Exemption from Plat or Official Map Other Trustees x Do you personally, (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. `Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the Town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the Town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO_X Complete the balance of this form and date and sign below where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold: Title or position of that person: Describe that relationship between yourself (the applicant) and the Town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A through D (below) and/or describe the relationship in the space provided. The Town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply): A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non -corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this day of AQr I ( j 1 Jan Ni holson Christine A Clancy Notary Public, State of New York No. 01 CL6115367 ualified in Bronx County Commission Expires March 14,20-L?- Patricia 4,20 Patricia C. Moore razil-.�9zaZ N „88'Lb,TO.Tb £i0Z/61/6 :a;eo Ma6E)u,I Bn `85611 AN `OIUOOOd `ul �O@N ueipuI FA -ZlOgsuaal k;;WME) Li � sl" - �,� V661 w' A r. y =� 1 S 4 'R >s /L �t e .a r r b. APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION APPLICANT: 4 dam s 4 A/tc.fi a /s —7 DATE PREPARED: 1. For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being II. New Construction Areas (New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Dimensions of first floor extension: NGw 5`/ " S Dimensions of new second floor: 6iozev No? Dimensions of floor above second level: �u Height (from finished ground to top of ridge): Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed? If natural existing grade to first floor: yvs c X 40 `3 •% ' - o.d!�n Yo i sr ¢ 7ndRoo.- e do'x 2.a � please provide height (above ground) measured from r• /O 4/0 III. Proposed Construction Description (Alterations or Structural Changes) (Attach extra sheet if necessary). Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: 5 is n-1 IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage (from surveyor):C�yt,44 A-A�).2 Existing square footage of buildings on your property: '7, g' Y .-. clenro / rh gY 311 syr Proposed increase of building coverage: A -4W - / . 5'fZ — -re-&z,4, Square footage of your lot: %D a',7 Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: /(p . -4- V. Purpose of New Construction: /70 U S.e 2vcoC%ate�y° VI. Please describe the land contours (flat, slope %, heavily wooded, marsh area, etc.) on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement (s): Please submit 8 sets of photos, labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction, and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 4/2012 y QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? Yes No (IV, the hr o N e4 -"ad- ") B. Are here any proposals to change or alter land contours? No Yes please explain on attached sheet. 1.) Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? yes 2.) Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application? QS 3.) Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? \le S 4.) If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? % O Please confirm statues of your inquiry or application with the Trustees: T��z4&1 VGU?a4faeio and if issued, please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? 6 a4UM t d � S' -SegZ Ze ba E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting?_,� �bPlease show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above line. F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? Ab If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe: G. Please attach all pre -certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If any are lacking, please apply to the Building Department to either obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel? IVO If yes, please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. p I. Please list present use or operations conducted at this p�(cel-t'��c�in El and the proposed use )Co�aP�.r�c-e (ex: existing single family, proposed: same with garage, pool or other) Authorize signature and Date 1727+ +16s7 NOTES AREA ■ 55,145 SQ. FT. « SEE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP PANEL NO. 561050.0164 H LAST DATED SEPT. 25, 2009. 17.01 o� � 16.03 / ' �}�< 1699+ FRAME � 14s' / t16.99 SHED J / gY \ +15.99 +14.76 N j3OARD OF APPEAL' 16s7 14.4ga 0 \ / /FIRM ZONE BOUNDARY LINE AS SCALED FROM FLOOD IS RATE MAP \ 14 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 tel. 651.1212505 fax. 651.?27.0144 admin.youngengineering.com Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor Thomas C. Wolpert, Professional Engineer f Douglas E. Adams, Professional Engineer Robert C. Tact, Architect SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION ' WE HEREBY CERTIFY TO J A N N I C H O L S O BL.THAT SURVEY WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYS ADO TE ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL LAND �r \ J � l Abj 3F HOWARD W. YOUNG, N. L.S. NO. �'•.�` %� �� � `�V '\�+\ r �V \OAP / CBR$ AREA ESTABLISHED 11/01/1990 %VZ O - MONUMENT SET ■ = MONUMENT FouND Q = STAKE SET A - STAKE FOUND DI - DRAINAGE INLET SURVEY FOR JAN NICHOLSON at Feconic, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York I BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY I County Tax Map DTehiet 1000 sectio: 56 mmk 07 Lot 04 FIELD SURVEY COMPLETED OCT. 50, 2015 MAP PREPARED NOV. 01, 2015 Record of Revisions RECORD OF REVISIONS DATE AMENDED BULKHEAD LABEL NOV. 15. 2015 INDICATED FIRM ZONE DATA NOV. 21,201 6EPERAL JUL, 21,201 40 O 20 40 60 Scale: V = 40' JOB NO. 2013-0211 DWS. 2015_0211lop I OF I PLOTTED Br Laptop PLOT DATE: Jul 22, 2014 - & 51am DWG FILE: R:\2013\2013-0211\dwg\2013-0211.bp.dwg I 0 0 O J a \rU unw rnurtittu Kicrtnr Vn LIR nrAn nun n, rnra >urtrc i> n rrtN nun v ac.,nu� .wa v me ncn rurtn >rnrc ryu..n rrun tr ar,r+.ca anunrr ncncv'1 rn.wr rtvrutrl ur:ca ru uurxw, arnut,rurtc> nrtt run n >rcur � runruac nnu nnc nur iu a u>ry ru [>irouan rrturcrt > unca art rurt cnct, Irian u r[n.,c>. \,�, .,urr[a u r xinvcl rnr wr ormrn nc rN wrtr a nn[u arx oua>tu xwL annu nur oc t,un>rucrtry ru a n rwr rwc sur nrr[nrrun INDICATED HEREON SHALLr RUN ONLY TO THE PERSON FOR WON THE SURVEY IS PREPARED AND ON HIS BEHALF TO THE TITLE COMPANY. GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY AGENCY AND LENDINGINSTITUTIONLISTED HEREON. AND TO THE ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDING INSTITUTION. CERTIFICATIONS ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE TO ADDITIONAL MISTITUNONS OR SUBSEQUENT OWNERS. r (5) THE LOCATION OF WELLS (W), SEPTIC VTANKS c(ST) h CESSPOOLS (CP) SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM FIELD OBSERVATIONS AND OR DATA OBTAINED FROMn OTHERS. At - 1 r� \ i ' —,; n t" r1� a .. .:a� r r - _ \ — • / i \ ./ .015 s ° • Y.. \ p „r r d 46* Al t J, -1 \06' Y�4 �( \ N\7 ,.�° 8 Q- \ \ \ kr v \\_ \ \ \ PO • F - n9.r . 1V \ r n Y 4, S E Itio \ \ \ \ c c> v \ \ \ \e \ \ Ir r \ \ \ \ AA \ \ \ \lop r \ \ \ \ o \\ \\ \ CP u \ 0,,. cp e oma? \ \ \ S \ d'rn v \ ti� \ s s A D V A \ w.. , . oo \ L9W ; \ 6T \ G \ ti Aw r , W s� u r �s R •� 46 .. r� 3� s ti 'oe 1 44w,y k. y. OQ•� �G ti % o� ass � p. NOTE: HOUSE HAS BEEN RAZED. �� V O O s � I GHOLSON FARGFL 00 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 110101 tel. 631.721.2303 fax. 631.727.0144 adminoyoungenglneering.com m a Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor Thomas G. Wolpert, Professional Engineer Douglas E. Adams, Professional Engineer LEGEND Robert G. Tast, Architect HWM = HIGH WATER MARK H5E = HOUSE BULK = BULKHEAD DECK = DECK ROF =ROOF jpFCEI\/ECS ��AFtD 0� APPEALS 5UR1/EYOR'5 CERTIFICATION • 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UTILIZING AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY 8 CONVENTION SURVEYING TECHNIQUES. THE APPROXIMATE HIGH WATER MARK, BULKHEADS, DECKS $ HOUSES WHERE DIMENSIONS ARE SET FORTH WERE LOCATED BY US USING CONVENTIONAL SURVEYING TECHNIQUES. F•€:iV A y ,. C.� HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. L.S. NO. 458013 SURVEY FOR JAN N I CHOL.50N at Feconir, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York BAYFi20NT SURVEY County Tax Map D stF of 1000 Section 56 Block 0-7 Lot q MAP PREPARED JUL. 10, 2014 Record of Revisions RECORD OF REVISIONS DATE GENERAL JUL. 21, 2014 50 O 25 50 100 Iso Scale: I" = 50' JOB NO. 2013-0211 DWG. 2013_0211_survey_bluff—block I OF I EXISTING LOT COVERAGE( UP TO BULKHEAD) I EXISTING HOUSE: EXISTING GARAGE EXISTING DECKS: 1528.68 sq. ft 145.86 sq. ft 519.8 sq. ft 2194.34 sq. ft AREA OF LOT(UP TO BULKHEAD): 27947 sq. ft TOTAL EXISTING LOT COVERAGE= 7.8 % [PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE( UP TO BULKHEAD) PROPOSED HOUSE: 3358.7 sq. ft PROPOSED GARAGE: 725.6 sq. ft PROPOSED SEGIAN CLUB: 540 sq. ft 4624.3 sq. ft AREA OF LOT(UP TO BULKHEAD): 27947 sq. ft TOTAL PROPOSED COVERAGE= 16.5% op ,"A Owner: NICHOLSON RESIDENCE 8190 INDIAN NECK LANE PECONIC, NEW YORK Architect: Robert G. Madey Architects 59 Sequams Lane West Islip, New York 11795 (631) 537-9601 fax (631) 669-7994 MADEYARCHITECT@ GMAIL.COM TION TAKEN FROM SURVEY PREPARED BY LAND SURVEYOR SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY 5 SF 07 LOT # 09 i. VED AUG 18 2014 BOARD OF App Revisions: No. Revision Date Drawing Title: SITE PLAN Drawing No. SKI Scale Date 1"=20'-0" MAY 27, 2014 1 a' -n 1 /a" FIRST FLOOR PLAN a r C, I C, 'J7'_A 1 /R" SECOND FLOOR PLAN Owner: NICHOLSON RESIDENCE 8190 INDIAN NECK LANE PECONIC, NEW YORK Architect: Robert G. Madey Architects 59 Sequams Lane West Islip, New York 11795 (631) 537-9601 fax (631) 669-7994 MADEYARCHITECT@ GMAIL.COM Revisions: No. Revision Date Drawing Title: FLOOR PLANS Drawing No. SK2 Scale Date 1/8"=l' -O" MAY 27, 2014 SEAGYAN CLUB NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION DETACHED GARAGE EAST ELEVATION INDIAN NECK ROAD SIDE SOUTH ELEVATION WATER SIDE Owner: NICHOLSON RESIDENCE 8190 INDIAN NECK LANE PECONIC, NEW YORK Architect.- Robert rchitect:Robert G. Madey Architects 59 5equams Lane West Islip, New York 11795 (631) 537-9601 fax (631) 669-7994 MADEYARCHITECT@ GMAIL.0 OM Revisions: No. Revision Date Drawing Title: ELEVATIONS Drawing No. SK3 Scale Date 1/811=11-01, MAY 27, 2014