HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-13406TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR
TOWN IIALL
SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
NONCONFORMING PREMISES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the
/X_~ Land Pre C.O. #-Z13406
/ / Building(s) Date- MAY 1, 1985
/-/ Use(s)
located at
3440 NASSAU PT. RD.
CUTCHOGUE
Street Hamlet
shown on County tax map as District 1000, Section 111 , Block
04 ,
Lot032 , does.~not)conform to the present Building Zone Code of the
~oUbdi~sion-~a~sa~ PQ~t Filed Map No. 156 All of 168 part of 169
vrn or oou~hom ~or ~ne Io£1owmg reasons:
IN'SUFFICIENT TOTAL AREA.
On the basis of information presented to the Building Inspector's Office,
it has been determined that the above nonconforming /_~tLand /2/Building(s)
/_/Use(s) existed on the effective date the present Building Zone Code of the
Town of Southold, and may be continued pursuant to and subject to the appli-
cable provisions of said Code.
IT IS FURTHER CERTIFIED that, based upon information presented to
the Building Inspector's' Office, the occupancy and use for which this Certifi-
Property is one parcel encompassing lots 1-2-&3
cate is issued is as follows: Lots 16~ & part of Lot 169-Mathews.' Property
contains one story, one family, wood framed dwelling, with a garage; shed;
Residential Agricultural zone with access to Wunneweta Rd; a town main-
tained road.
The Certificate is issued to HARRY J. & LILLIAN A. BAGLIVI
(owner, ~k-~C~keX ~ Xt~ t~ R_R ~
of the aforesaid building. ~
Suffolk County Department of Health Approval N/A
UNDERItqllTERS CERTIFICATE NO. N/A
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the owner of the above premises HAS
NOT CONSENTED TO AN INSPECTION of the premises by the Building Inspec-
tor to determine if the premises comply with al! applicable codes and ordin-
ances, other than the Building Zone Code, and therefore, no such inspection
has been conducted. This Certificate, therefore, does not, and is not intended
to certify that the premises comply with all other applicable codes and regula-
tions.
Building inspector
FORM NO. 6
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Building Department
Town Hall
Southold, N.Y. 11971
APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
Instructions
This application must be filled in typewriter OR ink, and submitted in duplicate to the Building Inspec-
tor with the following; for new buildings or new use:
1. Final survey of property with accurate location of all buildings, property lines, streets, and unusual
natural or topographic features.
2. Final approval of Health Dept. of water supply and sewerage disposal-(S-9 form or equal).
3. Approval of electrical installation from Board of Fire Underwriters.
4. Commercial buildings, Industrial buildings, Multiple Residences and similar buildings and installa-
tions, a certificate of Code compliance from the Architect or Engineer responsible for the building.
5. Submit Planning Board approval of completed site plan requirements where applicable.
For existing buildings (prior to April 1957), Non-conforming uses, or buildings and "pre-existing"
land uses:
1. Accurate survey of p=operty showing all property lines, streets, buildings and unusual natural or
topographic features.
2. Sworn statement of owner or previous owner as to use, occupancy and condition of buildings.
3. Date of any housing code or safety inspection of buildings or premises, or other pertinent informa-
tion required to prepare a certificate.
Fees:
i. Certificate of occupancy $5.00
2. Certificate of occupancy on pre-existing dwelling
3. Copy of certificate of occupancy $1.00
4.Vacant Land C.O. $5.00
$15.00
Date t,...qT./~..~./~ .~....~.?...../~.~..,-~-
New Building .............. ~OJd o.r Pre-existing Building ...'~ ....... Vacant Land .............
.: .
LocauonoT~roperw ..,'~%4;~:..%., .................. ' .............. ~ ........... =).. ~'
Hou~ No. Street Hamlet
Owner or Owners o,,ro,er.,
County Tax Map No. 1000 Section .... /../] / ....... Block ... ~. ~ ....... Lot .... ~.~..¢~ ~
Permit No ........... Date of Permit .......... Applicant ..................................
Health Dept. Approval ........................ Labor Dept. Approval ........................
Underwriters Approval ........................ Planning Board Approval ......................
Request for Temporary Certificate ..................... Final Certificate .......................
Fee Submitted $ .............................
Construction on above described building~~ap~/eg,~]~ ~,
Applicant .)~/., ~ H-./..~~. L~..~..v...~ . . .
TOWN OF $OUTHOLD
OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR
P.O. BOX 728
TOWN HALL
SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971
21 October 1982
TEL. 765-1802
Mr. Harry Baglivi
Nassau Point Road
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Dear Sir:
The property in question was divided (by Planning Board) on
June 23, 1969 while under the ownership of George Mathews.
These two lots were listed as lots #168 and lot #169, divided
they became lots 1-2-3-4.
From our conversation, I got the impression t~at this was the
condition when you purchased the entire property. Subsequently,
you sold~6ff ~lot #4.
In 1971 the zoning code was updated, requiring a minimum of
40,000 sq. ft. or an acre of property in order to have a build-
able lot. At the time this did not effect your property as they
were pre-existing.
In 1975 you went to the Board of Planning, requesting a lot line
change on lots 3 & 2 so you would be able to build a house for
your daughter. This was granted.
After 1975 laws were enacted, Federal, State, etc. one of which
states that if property has been subdivided, and all parcels re-
main in the same name and said parcels are not developed within
three years, then said parcels will merge back into a single parcel.
On September 29, 1980 ycu applied to the Board of Appeals for per-
mission to put a swimming pool in your backyard (former lot #2).
You had been informed by the Building Department of what had hap-
pened to the property. You were informed, at the hearing, that
as one piece of property, you could put a swimming pool in what
would be considered the rear yard and you indicated the pool was
what you wanted. This was approved. You then (the same evening)
requested a variance to redivide the now merged one piece of pro-
perty back to three lots and this was denied. The board did indi-
cate that although there are water problems among other things,
they might entertain building the property into two lots.
- 2 -
At present, I would have to say that with the research done on this
Plot, you have one lot. Any ction you would care to'~ake in chang-
ing this status would require action from both the Planning Board
and the Board of Appeals.
Hoping this will clarify things, I remain.
Sincerely ~gurs,
Victor Lessard
Executive Administrator
VL:jm
WlCKHAM, WlCKHAM & BRESSLER, p.c.
August 7, 1981
Mr. & Mrs. Harry Baglivi
Nassau Point Road
Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935
Re: Baglivi vs. Zoning Board of Appeals
Dear ~r. ~ Mrs. Baglivi:
I received a decision ~rom the Court on your variance for the three
lots. The Court took the position that the original variance, as
you applied for it, was properly denied by the Board. The Court
took the position that my oral application to the Board to amend the
variance papers, on the grounds that a variance was not required
because the lots were already separated, was insufficient to properly
amend the papers. The Court indicated that we should reapply, not
for a variance, but for a decision establishing that there is an
existing subdivision on three lots, and a variance is unnecessary.
If you recall, when Mr. Baglivi first came into the office, we sug-
gested that he take this course of action rather than apply for a
variance. Although the Court denied the appeal, I felt that their
decision was quite encouraging as far as suggesting that the new appli-
caption be made. In light of the Court's decision, I would like to
make an application to the Board of Appeals to. appeal the building
inspector's decision that there are not'three existing lots.
I would apprec~'~':it if you would call my offiCe for an appointment
after you have reviewed the decision,, so we may make the necessary
application.
Sincerely yours,
Abigail A. Wickham
AAW: ab
Enc.
3ui!diU? Ln.?ecto_ r
Hall
SoL~d~o!d, ~-~ 11971
you ~s
to a_*~_e_~c~n, i ~ce~ the file and fo%~d t~hat
forgot~_?~ tc -"~-i! t~ letter i b~-~ ~spo~ken to you abol~t,
not ila%~ it ~n Vo~- !Rle.
I wot~ld like ~o rec~ ~u~_st ccnfi_~mticn of ~e ~~ of ~ s~ 1~
~ ~ts ~ s~m on ~qe ~los~ s~i~ ~p, a~ on J~e 2, 1969,
~nd ~fi~ ~ 1975. ~ng a re~nt ~-~sa~cn, y~ s~s~ ~t 1%~Ti~
l~u a let~ ~~g ~s r~st wi~ ~ ~i~ of ~e s~g ~s.
~ ~69, ~ Pl~nkng ~ a~%~ ~ s~i~ of ~ 168 ~d 169 ~
~ ~ A of Nassau Point, ~ ~. ~6, ~ f~ (4) !~. ~t 4 w~ ~
ou~ l~g a~ ~ ~ not ~1%~ ~ ~qe ~ii~ 's ~iica~. ~ 1975, ~e
]i~ ~-~ lo~ 2 ~ 3 (2~1 No. 2089). ~ ~ was ~,~ ~ ~e
P~g ~ ~ a~%~ ~ letfer ~ t~c~ 26, ~75, ~f at~.
~g ~ ~t ~i~ ~ing, ~ P~m~g ~ ~t a let~r ~ ~he
B~ of ~ls, ~py at~, Ln~g ~t ~e m~ s~i~ a~v~
~ :de~ :si~ra~ as su~". ~,~, %he Pl~n~g ~d ~si~rs ~
~ s~si~ ~ s~ ~ ~d.
Mr. Eaglivi appli~ for a v-ar~nce %o divide t~he property Lnto t~zee (3)
separate lots. ~he variance was ~nied and the de~l ~ upheld by ~he
(k)uz-t.. During the v~r~nce h~a-ring, I r~qumsted the Board of ~ppeals to o~sider
the_ applic~tic~ not as a variance but ra~h~_r a~ a r~quast to confirm.th~ ex~t~nce
of three se?xlrate lots. ~he fburt ~i-~ not ccnsi~r my oral request at ~.~e h~mring
to be sufficient to c~banga th~ appltcatic~, without prejudice to ai~ply s~fically
for a determinaticn that the property c~nsists of three se.~ate lo~s..,
Therefore, I would l~ke to r~t om~firo~ti~n of t~ee separat~ lots, based
~ the minor s ~ubdivision, as an~nded in 1975. If there is any additi~qal info~:mtic~
you need, please feel free to call.
Very truly yours,
~bigail A. Wickham
169
- 'Z$~.04 ~
I'~ N. NE
~75.00
~UI:IKI:IHT~-'"2"'.u 4:. .... ~ECJRilY Til''~= ~H