Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-53.-4-9
OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY 11971 L MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Leslie Weisman, Chair Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator ve Date: April 24, 2014 Re: Coastal Consistency Review for ZBA File Ref GARY and KATHLEEN ZUAR #6743 SCTM#1000-53-4-9 GARY and KATHLEEN ZUAR #6743 - Request for Variances from Articles XXIII and XXII, Sections 280-124 and 280-116B and the Building Inspector's February 25, 2014 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit for demolition of an existing single family dwelling and construction of a new single family dwelling and accessory garage, at; 1) less than the code required single side yard setback of 15 feet, 2) less than the code required combined side yard setback of 35 feet, 3) more than the code permitted maximum lot coverage of 20%, 4) less than the code required bulkhead setback of 75 feet, located at: 1905 Bayshore Road (adj. to Shelter Island Sound) Greenport, NY. SCTM#1000-53- 4-9 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of, Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action are CONSISTENT with the LWRP policies and therefore CONSISTENT with the LWRP provided that the Board require that the applicant: 1. Preserve existing vegetation on site to the greatest extent practical (specifically the trees near Bay Shore Road) to protect the community character of the residential neighborhood. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. BOARD MEMBERS Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Eric Dantes Gerard P. Goehringer George Horning Kenneth Schneider OF SO!/r�o� ti O Ol,�� iQ 10OUNV1 http://southoldtown.northfork.net LkdD/Hali Southold 53095 Main Road -P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex /First Floor, Capital One Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 - Fax (631) 765-9064 April 1, 2014 Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Southold, NY 11971 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. #6743 - Zuar Dear Mr. Terry: a f1 lj1� • q 2 %J,4 i We have received an application for demolition and construction of new dwelling in Greenport. A copy of the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval under Chapter 280 (Zoning Code), and survey map, project description form, are attached for your reference. Your written evaluation with recommendations for this proposal, as required under the Code procedures of LWRP Section 268-51) is requested within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman Chairperson Encls. T� TOWN OFSCU'101D �?� O►RD ;11114 : Cz- OWNER STREET VILLAGE > �. 73 A Y S#6 tom" . ,FORKAER O ERN 5 N A (j f f!. k -p k -o S W TYPE OF BUILDING ZES.S. VL. FARM COMM. CB. MISC. ' Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS 3166 l2 t 79 7a- f R. /aa44�rT P, JA69a.41 300 416 (1 -1 2 9.5= L- 1`1 .3 S - kl AGE BUILDING CONDITION } f N�JV NORMAL BELOW ABOVEtlG�'S 31263 c Y FARM Acre Value Per Acre Value 10(i 111 -1- "% "'' ' % s N_C. ki Tillable 1 Tillable 2 Tillable 3 ` Woodlandp Swampland FRONTAGE ON WATER 71- 3D S`y Brushland FRONTAGE ON ROAD House Plot DEPTH 3 f BULKHEAD �FAlR) L Total DOCK Page 1 of 1 41 y�a� 9 http://gis.co.suffolk.ny.uslrpsIESRI.ArcGIS.ADF. Web.MimeImage.ashx?ImgID=e3ec63a2... 4/1/2014 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = V EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION SCALP: 1/8" = V PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION SCALE: lis" = r --, I — --- -, � EXISTING EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1J8" = 1' REVISIONS: 0 N w u 1 z 0 � W �z 0 E-4 a a �w zzw F� v� W w H w-4 A � x xo DRAWN: MH 7 MS SCALE: 114"=I' -O" - JOB M Much 06, 2014 SHEET NUMBER: A-2 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = V EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = f REVISIONS: 0 n:O1� w Ad o ti z 0 z 06 a� ga w 0 z z O A x a DRAWN: MH/MS SCALE: 1/4"-1'-0" 2oB x: Much 061 2014 SHEET NUMBER: A-3 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = V EXISTING WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1' REVISIONS: 0 ro N U �n a � a a W W a O aa? Cw w E A oa x0 on as a DRAWN: MH/MS SCALE: 1/V -l'11" JOB N: Much 06, 2014 .SHEET NUMBER: A-4 2M — PROPERTY LINE all j • �d7 PORCH ------------ 7 0 PANTRY SPRING / SUMMER PREVAILING WINDS (FROM SOUTH-WEST) PROPERTY LINE FALL / WINTER -CQ------- PREVAILING WINDS (FROM NORTH-WEST) PROPOSED 1ST. FLOOR PLAN 1/8" - 1'SCALE: NORTH A, ACTUAL d NORTH REVISIONS: 0 N eU z � � a a � U a z 0 w FF W z a a A x o0 x° N o� Ch DRAWN: MH/MS SCALE: 114"-l'A" JOB X: Much 061 2014 SHEET NUMBER: A-5 WING SPACE: ENCLOSED PORCH: COVERED PORCH: DECK EXISTING. 1394.9 SQ. FT. 270.7 SQ. FT. I 48.0 SQ. FT. I 550.7 SQ. FT. PROPOSED: 1762.3 SQ. FT. 221.2 SQ. FT. 491.0 SQ. FT, 587.2 SQ. FT. REVISIONS: 0 N eU z � � a a � U a z 0 w FF W z a a A x o0 x° N o� Ch DRAWN: MH/MS SCALE: 114"-l'A" JOB X: Much 061 2014 SHEET NUMBER: A-5 PROPOSED 2ND. FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8" - 1' i UVING SPACE: DKK PROPOSED 1542.6 SQ. Ff. 1100.0 SQ. FT. PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1' PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8"= 1' PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1' PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1' REVISIONS: I& i 0 U h � a tu EA k a z � z cW7 ra z W a Q N a DRAWN: MH / MS SCALE: 114 -P -0 - JOB N: March 06, 2014 SHEET NUMBER: A-7 \ , /• WORK BENCH •\ /' oom x- ._.—._._._. e /•/ i •\•\ �....... ...... PROJECT NORTH \ACTUAL NORTH ATTIC PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = V PROJECT NORTH �s ACTUAL NORTH PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = V I REVISIONS:I SHEET NUMBER: ra:3 r C2 + r .V • � `� 7 J ,/`rte ��-... � *�. t f, it �` ,, �.-�'` �/ �'' .;�--"' ✓ fr ff % /-A � � 'moi'-'�'� +" " : . ,_ �' " �% ,..._--=-•-.... �' Vis. • - / - I I 1. (3) Gary and Kathleen Zuar Dated March 8, 2014 iz Looking NE WIN " k�l • � lo •• r �. �.i4`r ,� :i l,.il''.rL f �s ♦..:. ., I, IMF 10 �t}#+} I .. j r F y � �' �}� � t � r r,ty.}",< t S f-,, _ •-fit ,t,,,,�,. +' ,rte f r � 't`�;"'`'y,,,,&a�'t ¢;� "° /"r' ��`"�; a.4 `^mac a,� �<. 3 •�: ��.... �}c:�4'� r! x'�� , +'"tLr�t`,s �, ;Y^'•+,i( looking 5W tl 4 « + .+a '� +�tb ` a^+i�F • 9 �� � . * 4� .,A.» �.� t • FFA+'"''' �j�, '�y'��'"� � tlf . �1a:?9A r w 1 x y 99 i` AA 01 lit, _... .i f• ' -. ...{ a tt r ;. rti • t FORM NO. 3 6,q �3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: February 25, 2014 TO: Michael Kimack (Zuar) 29 Heights Road Fort Solanga, NY 11768-2629 Please take notice that your application dated February 6, 2014 For permit to demolish an existing single family dwelling and construct a new single family dwelling and accessory garage at Location of property: 1905 Bayshore Road, Greenport County Tax Map No. 1000 -Section 53 Block 4 Lot 9 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction on this 29,550 square foot lot in the R-40 District is not permitted pursuant to Article XXHL Section 280-124, which states that on lots measuringbetween 20,000 and 39,999 square feet in total size a minimum single side yard setback of 15 feet a minimum combined side yard setback is 35 feet, and a maximum lot coverage of 20 percent allowed. Following the proposed construction, the dwelling will have a sin leg_side yard setback of 9.8 feet, a combined side yard setback of +/- 20 feet and total lot coverage 23%. Furthermore the proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article XXII Section 280-116B, which states; "All buildings located on lots upon which a bulkhead, concrete wall riprap or similar structure exists and which are adiacent to tidal water bodies other than sounds shall be setback not less than seventy- five (75) feet from the bulkhead." Note to Applicant: Any change or deviatio to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A. Fee: $ Filed By: Assignment No. APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS AREA VARIANCE House No. / OsT Street 46Ay.J 1,CRL0 RD. Hamlet IaPE�iVoa.P7' SCTM 1000 Section_,MBlock_-Lot(s) 9 Lot Size ?2 T,�29 —Zone X 4D I (WE) APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATEDAWZS"2T O /4 BASED ON SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED j&/ .S Z & Applicant(s)/Owner(s): (W Y AAD �.4�.yLE�'N ?&AQP Mailing Address: 28 W/LLE>''S 4^N.E , P44� _0?Y.E, Al -y .4 Telephone: Fax: Email: NOTE: In addition to the above, please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney, agent, architect, builder, contract vendee, etc. and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative: All CWAV�Z A .L-1,AIAQe for (Owner ( )Other: Address: 12! i2/t/4 ff2, W /V- X // 201 Telephone: 6V 7Z7Fax: P.4 &d Email:Lbfk/hAC.e2by Vll✓i{/ZarV./V.G�T Please check to specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to, from the above names: ( ) Applicant/Owner(s), 04 Authorized Representative, ( ) Other Name/ Address below: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED FOR: Building Permit ( ) Certificate of Occupancy () Pre -Certificate of Occupancy ( ) Change of Use ( ) Permit for As -Built Construction ( ) Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article, Section, Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by num))ers. Do not quote the code.11 I - Type ofA pial. An Appeal is made for:' Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ( ) A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law- Section 280-A. ( ) Interpretation of the Town Code, Article Section ( ) Reversal or Other A prior appeal bo has, () has not been made at any time with respect to this property, UNDER Appeal No(s). 67Z2_ Year(s). Z C24 5t- . (Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our ofce for assistance) Name of Owner: ZBA File# REASONS FOR APPEAL (Please be specific, additional sheets may be used with preparer's signature notarized): 1. An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighbor or a detriment to nearby properties if granted, because: a✓GA/YONAi2�W 441V YWE s07W,4 CXS 1.0 P,�'OiPGS, D WI[L M CO�✓JY1r,4j11 by/!r' a�iS>.4PJ T.9s1 �/lS' I-V /'h'- N4V6A;, 4ello4 017W,0J � 51104C,e 720Y;W/•✓/NG*V.Vlc WJ1-c A6"'V//v7iYE Iwl'rr- Ar (,VIIL 7745eX/il/�✓!> J��A�y4�pD.I�T.eY/g4� iPA/1'y/VG Dh!E �"D!/ND,4T�CYtI Ta,4VOJD �uTU,P4 i'r! Cid p�/Y�GE iyVYo C"J RoerrA/G ,9 tn�o /MR Y 4)Z!5 p c o m-,newr w11 -A1 rN,& AVC10V fOR //,040re aA ,s/Q' 7 X NAW Z CA9 � t� 2. The enefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: v-!� z, r (/JLE- /t1,4NY B/'/w-.e 1,v /!' LCWG ,grVO /ViI,QON,ENSw,ZA'& W/L�X7,ivo C/7a ,4iN CJ-O.� ?o 'er J7,r� YA ePr,# wP �nuJA E jvp r�R llaoi�v� .v�✓ A, l,O�IO/V TG�4't'D D�,e� fi�"aN7A�l/A /iDA/i1/G ,4 J25 2W �XY If W i!5 �Ly ��he ��� f rel r�i�� d i�ot�ubstea��becaus Cl vp/�G Ti1d� J'l a,E yhye9 .�T.ri4C,eS. , X77710!/ G/y NOrv- Cn ref �,Qi'�/NG h�A'Y.� ,b r/ PR/oe �, C0*1fwc�/a+i wic�/var 89 �-a rl�,� w,er z r1��x WAW pp�vrOtJr2V Al' °moo ��D 12.8 5720 C, c o,/�F2 /A/el i 11V -/ Or /,0A,pp1,j6W 0,C,4 ✓ MAY AY AAND y X77+0061-' I -&W 71At tbe7V0 IJ'!N 4%pl*& WIN OMi�'-Or C41+,���//v 4. The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conflihonsns t�- neighborhood or district because: 'rVef, /QIZ514 CCy f1 f'7j' Olocr .Q S OG !1,Q5- AVp AA -1144R NAI -ORS CO/1/r7;tUC7;W OW NIRR O (its �/✓,D 5. Has the alleged difficulty been self created? X Yes, or { ) No Why: Are there any Covenants or Restrictions concerning this land? 0< No { ) Yes (please furnish a copy) This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. SigSig an�tuFe c Applicant or Authorized Agent (Agent must submit written Authorization from Owner) m 3 sr � Swoto before me this day of M o-jf c h 20 14 �N4.t.,ylic UNDA P. RANDOLPH NOTARY. ft, at"d.Nmyk dl��lk APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION APPLICANT: M/ CWAZZ A &/H,4 Ce, DATE PREP] 1,RED: 3& �f/¢- 1. For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed: fa!e&Q,11 /ON Of OW��LL/J✓G .OA/ 7 II. New Construction Areas (New Dwellin or New Ajditions/Extensigns)• ST-VA,X4416 Ork,48� = [hryovr �/A►.+?l S: J LC Dimensions of first floor extension: OWGf' A0R Dimensions of new second floor: / i/ Dimensions of floor above second level: Height (from finished ground to top of ridge): 34 Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed? If yes, please provide height (above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: W144 Se *,60,eox. ,courPl4 it ,�Bavf fx/-rr1,V6 &RA00 /N ZWT AAM -l' III. Proposed Construction Description (Alterations or Structural Changes) -4PP, R &X SAr/AK AA (Attach extra sheet if necessary). Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: C4J' Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: 2LDOR�/J//J� IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage (from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: -,g_3 / 9 Proposed increase of building coverage: R .1'/2.7 Square footage of your lot: 2 i 5S0= 7 UAWip ,yez* : /4.4 L 4 Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: ,?Cj 7o : &-eM V1D 0"W _ V. Purpose of New Construction: 4 A,/�w A."ATZO FW 0 f1 .!'ZMY "A&9 "JrrArf W4 Layz MR&Z 'PaRem #i' 'p -rex /S no AE)OLgas A ly4M f3Ulla" &VIAI& "j90"lt 6&Zj !Jt YN.� Vomvce'g pwar'Fer1m / VI. Please describe the land contours (flat, slope %, heavily wooded, marsh area, etc.) on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement (s): Please submit 8 sets of photos, labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction, and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 4/2012 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? Yes X No B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? _),:� No Yes please explain on attached sheet. C. 1.) Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? 2.) Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application?___V 3.) Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? ia., — w/iLL 4.) If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction?_)&5S_Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees: AMJ OJVak ra g ;/LAA and if issued, please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? /VO E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting?_Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above line. F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises?--&ig -If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe: M G. Please attach all pre -certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If any are lacking, please apply to the Building Department to either obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel?_" If yes, please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. I. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcelr'/J0,,-5V77AZ- and the proposed use (ex: existing single family, proposed: same with garage, pool or other) nm�- Z/wa�z Authorized signature and Date j FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall Southold, N.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY NO: Z-33246 THIS CERTIFIES that the building ADDITIONS Date: 09/11/08 Location of Property: 1905 BAY SHORE RD GREENPORT (HOUSE NO.) (STREET) (HAMLET) County Tax Map No_ 473889 Section 53 Block 4 Lot 9 Subdivision Filed Map No_ Lot NO. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated JUNE 20, 2008 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 34001-Z dated JUNE 20, 2008 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is DECK AND SCREENED PORCH ADDITION TO AN EXISTING ONE FAMILY DWELLING AS APPLIED FOR PER ZBA #5720 DATED 6/9/5. The certificate is issued to GARY & KATHLEEN ZUAR (OWNER) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPART14MU OF HEALTH APPROVAL N/A ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO_ 01-001626 07/27/0 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED N/A A horize ignature Rev. 1/81 �V�� Town of Southold Annex P.O. Box 1179 54375 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 _,� 10/19/2012 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No: 36018 Date: 10/19/2012 THIS CERTIFIES that the building ELECTRICAL Location of Property: 1905 Bay Shore Rd, Greenport, SCTM #: 473889 Sec/Block/Lot: 53.4-9 Subdivision: Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this officed dated 10/19/2012 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 37588 dated 10/19/2012 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is: Electric Service Upgrade The certificate is issued to Zuar, Gary & Zuar, Kathleen (OWNER) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO. PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED Authorized Signature FORM NO.4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Town Gerk's Office Southold, N.Y. Certificate Of Occupancy No. Z9655........ .. Date...August .30 ................... 19.7 THIS CERTIFIES that the building ................................................ Location of Property 1905 Bay Shore, Road .... . . ...........GrVAnpor.t h&6INo. Sbr6 Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section ..... 53 ..... Block ... 04...... ..Lot .. 09 ............ Subdivision Bay. Estates ........Filed Map No. ....31..Lot No. 0. PX .34... . conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated ... November ........ , 19 T pursuant to which Building Permit No. ...1 9945 1 .......... . dated . Dec ember. 1 ............... 1978. , was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ......... addition to Private One Family. Dwelling The certificate h issued to . Mr.. and 1 rs., S.. Mutkoski ..................... ... .loMnier.71I1N of the aforesaid building. Suffolk County Department of Health Approval ... ..... ................... . UNDERWRITERS CBRTIFICATE NO.423139 ... Februaxy . 20,..19?9 ... ............. . 1 . Buiiding Inspector ............ . RW 4M FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall Southold, N.Y. PRE EXISTING CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No: Z- 26403 THIS CERTIFIES that the building DWELLING Date: 04/22/99 Location of Property 1905 BAY SHORE RD GREENPORT (HOUSE NO.) (STREET) (HAMLET) County Tax Map No. 473889 Section 053 Block 0004 Lot 009 Subdivision Filed May No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Requirements for a ONE FAMILY DWELLING built prior to APRIL 9, 1957 pursuant to which CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY NUMBER Z- 26403 dated APRIL 22, 1999 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ONE FAMILY DWELLING* The certificate is issued to BARBARA E MUTKOSKI (OWNER) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL N/A ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO. N/A PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED N/A *PLEASE SEE ATTACHED INSPECTI Rev. 1/81 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD HOUSING CODE TNSPECTTON REPORT LOCATIONt 1905 MAY SHORE RD GREENPORT SUBDIVISION: MAP NO.: LOT (S) NAME OF OWNER (S): BARBARA E MUTIOSXT OCCUPANCY: STNGLR PAMILY BARBARA R MUTKOSKT ADMITTED BY: JOHN DERRBDRR ACCOMPANIED BY: IAME KEY AVAILABLE: BUFF. CO. TAX MAP NO.: 53.-4-9 SOURCE OF REQUEST: BARBARA E. MUTKOWB T. DATE: 94/22/99 DWELLS C TYPE OF CONSTRUCTIONt WOOD FRAME E STORIES: 1.0 S EXITS: _ 2. FOUNDATION: CEMENT BLOCK CELLAR: FULL CRAWL SPACE: TOTAL ROOMS: IST FLR.s -§ 2ND FLR.: _Q 3RD FLR.: Q BATHROOM(S)s 2.0 TOILET ROOM (S): 0.0 UTILITY ROOM(S): PORCH TYPES FRONT DECK TYPE: REAR WOOD PATIO TYPE: BREEZEWAY: FIREPLACE: GARAGE: DOMESTIC HOTNATER: YRS TYPE HEATER: LP GAS AIRCONDITIONING: TYPE HEATS OIL WARM AIRS H07WATER: Int OTHERs DLCO ffi9TRANCB ACCESSORY STRUCTURES: GARAGE, TYPE OF CONST.: STORAGE, TYPE CONST.: SWINKING POOL: GUEST, TYPE CONST.: OTHER: WOOD RBTAINING Wim_& STEPS VIOLATIONS: CHAPTER 45 N.Y. STATE UNIFORM FIRE PREVENTION & BUILDING CODE INSPECTED BY:JZYo—DATE ON INSPECTION: 04/21/99 JOHN M. BOUPI3 TIME START: 10:00 AM END: 10:20 AM .1 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer Vincent Orlando James Dinizio, Jr. Michael A. Simon bttp://southoldtown.northfork.net Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road • P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex /Fust Floor, North Fork Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -= Vi Tel. (631) 765-1809 • Fax (631) 765-9064 rII�QIN�G*, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF JUNE 9, 2005 ZB 20 - Gary and Kathleen Zuar Property Location: 1905 Bay Shore Road, Greenport CTM 53-4-9 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment If the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's 32,104+- sq. ft. parcel has 75 feet along Bay Shore Road and 384+- feet to the rear property line, below the apparent high water line of Pipes Cove. The property Is improved with a one-story frame dwelling, as shown on the August 24, 2004 survey prepared by Hillebrand Land Surveying, P.C. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's April 27, 2005 Notice of Disapproval, citing Section 100-239.413 in its denial of an application for a building permit to construct a proposed deck and screened4n porch additions, for the reason that the lot contains a bulkhead, concrete wall, riprap or similar structure, and the new construction will be setback less than 75 feet from that measurement. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on June 2, 2005 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant wishes to construct a new open deck/patio and screened -in porch at a minimum of 29 feet to the retaining wall structure, and at least 100 feet from the high-water mark. Also requested is relief for a 10.3 ft. setback on the south/east side instead of the code required 15 feet. The setback for the new construction will be a minimum of 24.8 feet on the north/west side, which is greater than the existing side yard setback of 9.7 feet at its closest point. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: Page 2 — June 9, 2005 ZB Ref. 5720 - G. and K. Zuar CPM ID: 534-9 1. Grant of the variance with the attached condition will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. This lot, like many in this area, is long and narrow and the setback after the addition will be consistent with other setbacks in the neighborhood. With respect to the request for a variance from the code required 75 ft setback from a bulkhead, the board finds that the bulkhead is retaining wall construction used to level the natural 6 ft slope of the property toward the water. The setback to the retaining wall construction is 29 feet, and all construction will actually be placed approximately 100 feet from the high water mark. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance because this lot like many in this area is long and narrow causing any addition to the` existing house toward the side lot line to require some variance from the code. 3. The variance granted herein is substantial representing nearly a 50% decrease in the code required 15 ft. minimum side yard setback. The remaining side yard will meet the code requirement of 20 feet minimum, which is greater than the remaining dwelling setback at 9.7 feet at this side yard. 4. The alleged difficulty has not been self-created. The lots in the area are long and narrowmaking any addition to the existing older houses difficult without a variance. 5. No evidence has been submitted to suggest that the relief granted will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant has obtained permits under the wetland ordinances for new construction on waterfront property. 6. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of an addition, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-13, motion was offered by Member Dinizio, seconded by Member Goehringer, and duly carried, to GRANT the variance as applied for, as shown on the construction diagrams prepared by Torkelson Builders, Inc. and survey dated August 24, 2004, amended February 14,"2005 by Hillebrand Land Surveying, P.C. subject to the following CONDITION.- That ONDITION: That the new deck/patio be constructed not higher than one grade, with the exception for entry/exit steps to the house. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other age 3 — June 9, 2005 ZB Ref. 5720 - G. and K. Zuar CTM ID: 53-4-9 features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Oliva (Chairwoman), Orlando, Goehringer, and Dinizio. (Member Simon was absent.) This Resolutions duly adopted (4-0). Ruth D. Oliva, Cha Approved for Filing AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WHEN TO USE THIS FORM: This form must be completed by the applicant for any special use permit, site plan approval, use variance, area variance or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district OR within 500 feet of a farm operation located in an agricultural district. All applications requiring an agricultural data statement must be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance with Section 239m and 239n of the General Municipal Law. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Name of Applicant: iy & Xl"A G;1G Address of Applicant: W AlY .PJ�D� D SP/V A Name of Land Owner (if other than Applicant): Address of Land Owner: 7 R W,,ZL9,EX LAN 7 p/ 41160 9H4 N •Y O 0 Description of Proposed Locatfon of Property: (road and Tax map .4,vp "OAWAI , F&L;C-LQV174V cl i LrW- number)�Q O� B.AY dL>,� .Ply Ct�LM MY Is the parcel within 500 feet of a farm operation? { ) Yes X No Is this parcel actively farmed? { ) Yes W No Name and addresses of any owner(s) of land within the agricultural district containing active farm operations. Suffolk County Tax Lot numbers will be provided to you by the Zoning Board Staff, it is your responsibility to obtain the current names and mailing addresses from the Town Assessor's Office (765-1937) or from the Real Property Tax Office located in Riverhead. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. NAME and ADDRESS (Please use the back of this page if there are additional property owners) ���� Signature of Applicant Date Note: 1. The local Board will solicit comments from the owners of land identified above in order to consider the effect of the proposed action on their farm operation. Solicitations will be made by supplying a copy of this statement. 2. Comments returned to the local Board will be taken into consideration as part as the overall review of this application. 3. Copies of the completed Agricultural Data Statement shall be sent by applicant to the propert} owners identified above. The cost for mailing shall be paid by the Applicant at the time the application is submitted for review. 4. 617.20 Appendix B Short Environmental Assessment Form Instructions for Comnletine Part 1- Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to fiurther verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 - Project and on or Information (Jj� /�j C'Lpl, pC�ri1/ c� �r'.v� .r "4 ti a WW 0 e a Name of Action or Project: f � Project Location (describe, and attach a location map): Brief Description of Proposed Action: A11-9 DhL'7e1Y'W,5X1J"1NG 4ZV �Npj* W1AAQ1P79W C 4y1yr49Cr,0V0U1 Z sO 4 Me h-149Vd�GE/V ��'.E= t 2 COX64MG4- W1 Xf:e-dcA D,P/✓, �i4YA/✓� f'.4,priNG �4 N,,,!5 -v ,/ PVC AMo P&40Y, .rY�s• Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone 3 E - Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: 91 VZPAZA0 NY% % 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, NO I YES administrative rule, or regulation? If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes, list agency(s) name and perjpt or a r val: ToGuNpF,lb vy7q�pl�.0l11`9S; NY-r'PX-C ,OJvO r W .acres 3.a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? _6 �7 — acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? �Q c. Total acreage (,project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled I)y the applicant or project sponsor? o" 67AWacres 4. Check all land uses that occur on, adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑ Urban ❑ Rural (non -agriculture) ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial >*tesidential (suburban) ❑ Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic ❑ Other (specify): ❑ Parkland Page 1 of 4 141&6, 5. Is the proposed action, a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? NO YES N/A —>< 6. Is the propose'. action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? NO YES 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes, identify: NO YES 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? b. Are public transportation service(s) available at or near the site of the proposed action? c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? NO YES 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe d features and technologies: C420 M C N eVI& — NO YES X &VAI&S MQr P11V&9290—IC� 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? If No, describe method for providing potable water: , NO YES 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: AMJ LAP -77C I—XIrFAe NO YES 12. a. Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic Places? b. Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? NO YES 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency? b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: NO YES 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: XShoreline ❑ Forest ❑ Agricultural/grasslands ❑ Early mid -successional Wetland ❑ Urban ❑ Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? NO YES 16. Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non -point sources? If Yes, a. Will storm m iter discharges flow to adjacent properties? ;KNO ❑ YES b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)? If Yes, briefly describe: �Y ❑ NOXYES NO YES Page 2 of 4 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of water or other liquids (e.g. retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)? If Yes, explain purpose and size: NO YES small to large impact impact 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste management facility? If Yes, describe: NO YES occur occur 1. Will thero posed action create a material conflict with an adopted land p p p use plan or zoning regulations? 20. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: NO YES 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: 'A AiX/J _ Date: 412 04 Signature: Part 2 - Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept "Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" Page 3 of 4 No, or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will thero posed action create a material conflict with an adopted land p p p use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit, biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a. public / private water supplies? b. public / private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic, archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources (e.g., wetlands, waterbodies, ;,roundwater, air quality, flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 Part 3 - Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and cumulative impacts. ❑ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. ❑ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type None of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 No, or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proF.)sed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion, flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3 - Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and cumulative impacts. ❑ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. ❑ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type None of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 Board of Zoning Appeals Application AUTHORIZATION (Where the Applicant is not the Owner) I, CA?IZ lr �" residing at _ 27 WIu�TS 14A,&E (Print property owner's name) (Mailing Address) 1gdl��t1,FTq/y 12 hereby authorize (Agent) &,ZC AU 04- A::��C/L to apply for variance(s) on my behalf from the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals. (Owner' i e) (Prit Owner's Name) AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME : /��CL.�/SfGrL .4, lfiCl�- (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance _ Variance Change of Zone Approval of Plat Other (activity) Building Permit k Trustee Permit X Coastal Erosion Mooring Planning Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicant/agent/representative) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply) : A) the owner of greater that 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation) B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non -corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation) C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or D) the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this 2 q day of - , 20�_ Signature lW /�, Print Name / f 1 C1A52 A APPLICANT/OWNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME : 6"y MAR (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Variance Change of Zone Approval of Plat Other (activity) Building Permit _ Trustee Permit Coastal Erosion Mooring Planning Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business Interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO _X If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicant/agent/representative) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply) : A) the owner of greater that 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation) B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non -corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation) C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or D) the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this _day of20 Signature Print Name'— Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# �Eg The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board 0 Planning Dept. 0 Building Dept. M Board of Trustees M 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital El construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) 0 (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: 9 Nature and extent of action: C0&f7-rUCr N)-cYY 9ZWHW40VJ25 WL4ws n&QgVO-e" oRYGv041- -W)J M ANa NOG -,7 Z CAI 6APA60 w RO-OC4rg;0 PofWAa 4Y A Al 0- 'PAZ � - Aff-z ,e4" MY Z A�'r %,ZK! .RAoN Location of action: AAY.2%?d?,6E X9422 W7— v -12 4 Present land use: ,¢%UE/YT%r�L Present zoning classification:_— 40 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: M/ ['L ,4. 1��M.9rle (b) Mailing address: 3Z1 ,P/V/.QO2OE D•P/V,,iE:7-Q/V,tc�� AI -X Z"eJ1 (c) Telephone number: Area Code( ) f %?%- Z/4.3 (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? If yes, which state or federal agency?. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use oft; coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. Yes [] No Z Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria 11 Yes D No Z Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Q Yes X No F� Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria R Yes © No x Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria Yes E No 0 Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. © Yes 0 No � Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes []No ® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No JCS Not Applicable C PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Ye11 No k ' l Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water -dependent uses and promote siting of new water -dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. 0 Yes 0 No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. waters. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No VI Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. FO IL] Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Created on 512510511:20 AM SOUTHOLD BOARD OF APPEALS PRIOR FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATIONS REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FOR THIRD FLOOR IMPROVEMENTS 1. ZBA File: 5852 Approval to construct additions and alterations to the existing dwelling and garage with non conformingside and combination side yard setbacks and from the front yard 2. ZBA File: 5516 Approval for demolition of existing dwelling, construct new single family home with wood deck with non conforming side yard setbacks and combination sideyard setbacks and nonconforming distance from the wood bulkhead 3. ZBA File: 5851 Approval for a deck extension which would be non conforming to a side yard and combination side yard setbacks and less than the required setback to the bulkhead. (same applicant as 5516) 4. ZBA File: 5996 Approval of additions to the existing dwelling with non conforming side yard setbacks and combined setbacks 5. ZBA file: 5375 Approval of a new one story addition and as built deck with nonconforming side and side yard combination, distance to bulkhead and nonconforming lot coverage greater than 20% 6. ZBA file: 6409 Approval of accessory garage with nonconforming side yard setback and lot coverage greater that 20% 7. ZBA file: 4994 Approval of alterations and additions to existing dwelling, dding a second story with nonconforming side yards and lot coverage that exceeds 20% 8. ZBA file: 6556 Approval of demolition and construction of two story dwelling with nonconforming side and side yard combination and lot coverage that exceeds 20% 1}12•aa MATCH SEE SEC. NO. 045 - ... 001 m-------z- 5. N.01.12-01 Q SEE Ste. NO.045 �_ LINE 14 -ow 1A 7 FOR PCL NO. 011-3m,m ,.7Aca i40;1 o N 1041-M MAIN OF 045415-004 /. 01-1343 , SOUTHOLD \ �i FOR PARCEL 0621 7A SQ 4 b SEE SEC. NOVO 2 7.6Ma 045-06007.3 c as26p6 �7� O cole+rr suFFaLlc 6-2a �• 1°""y '01D R,o14.WOF TONMOFSOUTHOLD */ or -mm KIM/ 1MYNQlO Im -a>a3 a 17 tr- 3 uaAla CouN1r OF SUFFOLK 112 01-x13 ' , /+ j. �qy, ' 10MO v5 •�717�; 2'Sltib t - ' 2511 t2 13 14 to td'.j ' 40�UINO�IL .1 15.1 WON OF �`O C2 C i 2 SOUTHOLD r ,,.,Ala r a ' �,' `>s WON OF SOUTHOLD O D LAND PNE56iVR10l/ ZCt 444 P W7Y #� 14.1 isw TOM OF SOUTHOLD29 CREEK PrES v i t 3Ma � 44.1 a 1 N z7A ' ,b' •!y y! y by ;1i �'' f�.� ? Aa, •,a •i "n, ', G r5 P ,a .' to 17 r5 r- +riaai r • +4 1 y '�.� , _ 8c' 1 s 1 Ara b , t .�' � y� •its q a: ♦ P .*5 y'� r 45.10 +� 7.5A Ar �+ ��4 a 1p - � y�ir � � © �� � �b 4► '' V5 i 17.2 1 � 1.{�a ";%% TAA 45.7 ' 12.8 46.9 \ A M 4611 7.5A 4A i 2 - ~ \ --. t _�: FOR PCL NO. 46.5 N Iw 1R '1 . SEE SEC. NO. 72A '� 4► C�'L1' M ,j � 3 • ; i "�.-�.�' 067-01-036 S TF ! :f MATCH--- ------ ---------SEE SEC. N0.06/ ---UNE MATCH ---SEE SEC. NO. 057 --Z- UNE `�. SEE SEC. NO. 057 �• VE'N . - at p7 • .......,.. ......,.,. A ------ .... — —•�— — w-••`.• — — — — ••a""•• "�`� "•,'°"• ,, NOTICE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, © K .aNN� SOUTHOLD sEcnoN No AN[aaMM tgLO/t001NCta; E A.�O�tY� —�— ......—.... t3,) �, . O �at..�. — —•— — -- •-- `" - Real Property Tax Service Agency v aaa 1WNIBtNICE.At76YH101A 4Aa[ oN ...E....l.. ----- t...rd..t,.. --�-- ^-- ]t MaNPa 06N..YNCN0F~lP0Wn0NW7W m 53 toN r m CANNr COM- awomm 4 N Y 115" m MLLAGE OF N'- attar— • d-5. "� �- — —a — — •+`�N"a-�'— — A — — �,'— asWlRoOlwnwt wPR rw01MrEG stlNC Pl llcr. M D ttiN1r 2]•�^ P-aA� 1Z1ANI-1Z'A `•• --- M--Ytt� --�-- —w1N— N-YINt¢ NT"Mfl WN17BtFERMM1 M0FVW nD 0 AO �0 A r"'�"'r"— -11`-Pay NFx oNaPEM MX $E A=AQPCV P 5.w 6K 1 � 1� PROPERTY MAP 121Ab1—a-- mNKwaoNoioe weL>eta APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer George Horning Ruth D. Oliva Vincent Orlando as SUFE' BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 765-1809 http://southoldtown.northfork.net RECEIVED y+K d : doom FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION JUL 2 9 2U MEETING OF JULY 10, 2003 , Appl. No. 5282 - KENNETH CERRETA Southold Town Clerk Property Location: 1655 Bay Shore Road, Greenport; Parcel 53-4-6. SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's 16,800 sq. ft. parcel, shown on the filed map of Peconic Bay Estates as Lot 26, has 50 ft. frontage along the north side of Bay Shore Road in Greenport. The property is improved with a one-story frame dwelling with deck and has 56.82 ft. (tie line) frontage facing Pipes Cove (Shelter Island Sound). The existing dwelling contains nonconforming side yards of 7.9 feet and +-4.5 feet and front yard at 34.7 feet, as shown on the survey prepared by Peconic Surveyors, P.C. dated October 13, 1987, revised December 6, 2002. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's October 9, 2002 Notice of Disapproval, citing Section 100-2446, in its denial of a building permit to construct an addition to the existing dwelling at less than 10 feet for a single side yard, less than 25 feet for total side yards, and less than 35 feet from the front lot line. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on May 15, 2003 and June 19, 2003, at which time written and oral evidence were presented Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, s.id other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant wishes to construct a garage addition, and alterations, to the existing dwelling. The original plan indicated a proposal for a 24.7' deep by 24' wide, one-story garage addition at 10 feet from the front property line and 4.8 feet from the northerly side line. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:AMENDED RELIEF: During the May 15, 2003 public hearing, the applicant was requested to increase the setbacks for a possible alternative garage plan that would be more conforming to the code's front setback requirement of 35 feet. On June 4, 2003, the applicant submitted a revised plan for a 30.7' x 25.7' garage addition shown on the 6/2/03 plan prepared by Frank Uellendahl, Architect, and do Page 2 — July 10, 2003 Appi. No. 5382 — Kenneth Cerreta 53-4-6 at Greenport survey with revised garage setbacks at 29.7 feet from the front lot line and 4 feet from the side line (adjacent to Lot 25 to the north). REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Grant of the alterative relief will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The proposed new construction measures 25'8' x 30'8" and is proposed four feet from the northeast property line and 29'8" from Bay Shore Road, which is similar to setbacks of nearby houses. The four -foot side yard maintains the same setback as the existing house. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The lot contains 10,560 sq. ft. to a be line along Pipes Cove high water mark (16,800 sq. ft. to the filed map line), and the building options are limited. 3. The alternative relief granted herein is substantial because the required side yard setback is a 6 ft. reduction of the code required 10 ft. minimum. The front yard .,adance is minimal and permits a 5 ft. 5 in. reduction in the code required 35 ft. minimum. 4. The difficulty was self-created when the applicant designed an addition which did not conform to the current Town Code requirements. 5. There is no evidence that the grant of the alternative relief will have an adverse effect or impact on physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this small beach community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 6. Grant of the alternative relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a garage addition, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Orlando, seconded by Member Goehringer, and duly carried, to DENY the variance requested, and to V Page 3 -- July 10, 2003 Appl. No. 5382 — Kenneth Cerreta 534-6 at Greenport GRANT Alternative Relief as shown on the revised plan for a 30.7'x 25.7' garage addition shown on the 6/2/03 plan prepared by Frank Uellendahl, Architect, and survey with revised garage setbacks at 29.7 feet from the front lot line and 4 feet from the side line. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Tortora (Chairwoman), Goehringer, Orlando, and Oliva. (Absent was Member Homing.) This Resolution was duly adopted (4-0). Lydia A'j4rtora, Chairwoman — Approved for Filing 7/,29' /03 yv N. 45.47'20"E. AREA - 10560 sq. 11. to tle //no LOT COVERAGE AREA TO TIE LINE EXISTING 21 x PROP. GAR. 6% LOT ® e7 Ji - s'7J /NALT '7-" Alv9WAY ,. - -- ¢o$ _ � N if.0 9.z 2C.4 1— - -- S. 4547'20' W. AREA = 16800 sq. /t. to f&d map llne LOT COVERAGE AREA Tp FILED MAP LINE EXISTONG 13 % PROP. GAR. 4 % 17 %... 315. 00' 315.00' MAP ' I 198.08' WALLA \ � 116.92' IIICC .aa �. NO EvVEW£ OF WETLANDS � J . LOT a'A TALL L1T. WALL a.5's a5's ro Krv.vv. LOT 27 CERTIFIED To, K FIRST AMERICAN TITLE ''1SI/RANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK TITLE NO. 385 - S - 2810 SOUTHOLD SAVINGS BANK UTOPIA ABSTRACT MARY PAPPAS 7 FLOOD ZONE AE (el. 8) FIRM 36103CO159 sig d'i 223.09' 357.00' MAP N tip 'CAN Q ,O 131.91' SURVEY OF LOT 26 "AWMW MAP'A'PECONC BAYES TATES" FLED MAY A SM FLE NO. "24 AT ARSHAMOMA OUE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY N. Y. wog -W -04-0d SCALE 1" = 30' OCT. 19 W7 FEB. 1l, 2000 ( prop, addition 1; �•�,se .hsc REVISEC OCr. 28, 19P.7 DEC. 6, 2002 " revlslol prop. garage, elev. 1 e1.1� 4 :. C• � 87-805 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS CD Southold Town Hall Ruth D. Oliva. Chairwomano� 53095 Main Road Gerard P. Goehringer C P.O. Box 1179 Lydia A. Tortora^� Southold, NY 11971-0959 Vincent Orlando 'i' p!� Tel. (631) 765-1809 James Dinizio, Jr. '�1 �� Fax (631) 765-9064 http:!!southoldtown.northfork.net RECEIVED'✓ BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION t-!1 3 0 MEETING OF NOVEMBER 4, 2004 Q ut o 10WCIefk ZBA File 5516 — JOHN and MARION BRANDVOLD Property Location: 1955 Bay Shore Road, Greenport; CTM 53-4-10 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type 11 category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's 18,905 sq. ft. parcel has 50 ft. frontage along the east side of Bay Shore Road, 322.18 ft. along the northerly side line, 344.03 feet along the south side line, and 54.57 feet along Pipes Cove. The property is improved with an one-story, single- family dwelling with deck as shown on the September 18, 2002 survey prepared by Joseph A. Ingegno, L.S. The existing dwelling is 52 feet to the bulkhead and has side yards at 8.9 feet and total side yard of 17.9 feet. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's March 4, 2004 Notice of Disapproval, amended March 25, 2004, citing Section 100-242A, in its denial of a building permit to construct a new single- family dwelling, after removal of the existing dwelling. The reasons stated in the Notice of Disapproval are that the dwelling will be less than 75 feet from the existing wood bulkhead, less than 10 feet in a single side yard, less than 15 feet on the opposite side, and for a total side yard area at less than 25 feet. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on April 22, 2004, at which time the Architect for the applicants requested an adjournment for submission of information relative to roof and elevation of the new dwelling. The September 14, 2004 reconvened, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicants wish to demolish the existing dwelling. On the 2/26/04 revised architectural site plan, applicants propose to remove the existing home, and replace it with a new single-family, one and one-half story dwelling, adding an 8 ft. wood deck at the rear of the dwelling and adjusting the angles of the foundation. In applicant's original request shown on the 3/22/04 schematic diagram, the proposed height was proposed at 307" to the top of the ridge, and 24-4Y2 ft. to the mid -point of the roof viewing the south elevation. Page 2 — November 4, 2004 File No. 5516 — John and Marion Andvold CTM Id: 53-4-10 0 ADDITIONAL iNFORMATION/AMENDED RELIEF: On July 19, 2004, the applicants submitted three schematic designs of the north, east and west elevations and partial site plan with first and second floor living areas. During the September 14, 2004 public hearing, the architect furnished a cardboard model of the proposed building for visualization and discussion. The height was lowered as revised and shown on the 7113/04 schematic diagram to 28 feet to the ridge. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION D BELOW: Based on the testimony and record before the Board and personal inspection, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Grant of the area variance will not produce an undesirable change in character of neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The applicant's house is one of few single -story houses left among the larger two-story house in the neighborhood along Bay Shore Road in Greenport. The proposed new 1 Y2 story dwelling construction measures 60 feet x 27.9 feet with a 28 ft. height to the ridge, as shown on construction diagrams prepared 7/13/04 schematic diagram, prepared by Meryl Kramer, Architect. After adjusting the angles of the foundation, the pre-existing side yard from the north property line, plus small deck, at nine feet will be maintained, and the pre-existing side yard from the south property line at 8.9 feet will remain the same. Also the pre-existing 44.5 feet from the bulkhead will remain the same after construction, as noted on the July 13, 2004 site plan prepared by Meryl Kramer Architect. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for applicants to pursue, other than an area variance. This lot is particularly long and narrow, which leaves the side yard with little or no room for expansion. The construction proposed is reasonable and logical. 3. The requested area variances are substantial and represent a 30.5 ft. reduction from the current code requirement of 75 feet from the bulkhead. The side yard variances are not substantial and represent minimal change from the pre-existing location of the dwelling and applicant's plan to keep the foundation in place and adjust the angles to square off the dwelling to the property. 4. The difficulty was self-created. While the difficulties are related to the nonconforming size of the property and location of the existing foundation, the plan does not conform to the cur. ,ant Town Code requirements and is designed to meet the owners' needs for additional living floor areas. 5. No evidence has been submitted to suggest that the variance will have an adverse impact on the physical condition of the neighborhood. 6. There is no evidence that the grant of the variances will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. Page 3 — November 4, 2004 File No. 5516 — John and Marion B• Id CTM Id: 53-4-10 • RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-13, motion was offered by Member Orlando, seconded by Member Goehringer, and duly carried, to Deny the original variance as applied for, and Grant alternative relief, as shown on the July 13, 2004 amended site plan and schematic diagrams prepared by Meryl Kramer Architect, subject to the following CONDITION: The open roofed porch and deck shall remain open. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Oliva (Chairwoman), Goehringer and Orlando. Absent were: Members Tortora and Dinizio. This R o tion was dqy a Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman 11/29/04 Approved for Filing N 45 ° 47'20" E EXIST. GRASS AND DIRT DRIVEWAY UTILITY so 10 POLE 2.2'N _\ // '__'PROPOSED V DIA. ' •' ' " ;. 7 DEEP LEACHING • / .— L(6 " 1 I• PROPOSED 11/2 STORY HOUSE / PROPOSED 1000 GAL PROPOSED / SEPTI ( . EXPANSION TANK D.W. j,POOL (3) HEDQk ROW-\ _ S 419 47'20"W EXISTING SEPTIC TO BE 10 jI-' ABANDONED IN -PLACE N PUMP DRY & FILL WITH (A CLEAN SAID & GRAVEL pw TEST HOLE rA I<N RECEIVED JUL 1 9 2Q04° 9 liEDGE ROW 'FOUND. CONC. \ MON. ONS Cie C PRO OSED DECK g & ST RS F ADDI N 1.301— WWI) M TO REMAIN \ FENCE 0.4'S IWhLL O.Ll / '*'-FENCE 02S / / WOOD FENCIE FOUND, / ALL LEADERS I EXIST. FOUND. TO CONC MON. DRAIN TO ! REMAIN 1 �.r�2'. DRYWELLS so ss 10 9 N/O/F GEORGE BRAUN & PARTIAL jITE PLAN BRAN DVOLD RESIDENCE 1"=20' REV. 7/13/04 M E R Y L K R A M E R a r c h I t a c l 31 SOUTH STREET P.O. BOX 683 GREENPORT, NY 11944 7 6 3 A-477.0180 813 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS • Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer James Dinizio, Jr. Michael A. Simon Leslie Kanes Weisman http://southoldtown.northfork.net Mailing Address: Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road • P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex /First Floor, North Fork Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 • Fax (631) 765-9064 FINDINGS. DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF APRIL 13, 2006 ZB File No. 5851 - JOHN and MARION BRANDVOLD Property Location: 1955 Bay Shore Road, Greenport CTM 53-4-10 RECEMD 0'14-44 9,i0 WW APR 2 7 2006 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration In this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's 18,905 sq. ft. parcel has 50 ft. frontage along the east side of Bay Shore Road, 322.18 ft. along the northerly side line, 344.03 feet along the south side line, and 54.57 feet along Pipes Cove. The property is improved with an one-story, single-family dwelling with deck as shown on the September 18, 2002 survey prepared by Joseph A. ingegno, L.S. The existing dwelling is 52 feet to the bulkhead and has side yards at 8.9 feet and total side yard of 17.9 feet. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's January 30, 2006 Notice of Disapproval, citing Sections 100-242A,100-244 and 100-239.4B, in its denial of an application for a building permit to constrict a proposed four foot extension to this proposed dwelling reconstruction. The reason stated by the Building Inspector in the denial is that the new construction will be less than 75 feet from the existing wood bulkhead, less than 10 feet in a single side yard, less than 15 feet on the opposite side, and for a total side yard area at less than 25 feet, and making reference to the Walz interpretation No. 5039 for the proposed addition(s). FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on March 30, 2006, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicants wish to construct an additional four -feet proposed as an extension, increasing the depth of the deck to 12 feet. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Grant of the variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The deck was previously approved by this board (Appeal No. 5516) and the applicants wish to extend the deck 4 feet in order to allow for more room. The new deck extension will not extend beyond the minimum 9 ft. side yard limitation on the north side, or 9.5 feet on the south side. Also the pre-existing, nonconforming setback of 44.5 feet between the deck and the bulkhead will remain the same after construction, as noted on the July 13, 2004 site plan and revised 2/6/06 partial site plan prepared by Meryl Kramer Architect. Page 2 —April 13, 2006 LB File No. 6851— J. and M. Bran CTM No. 534-10 U 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, the Zoning Board of Appeals must approve any chang,is made to an existing variance. 3. The variance granted herein is substantial. It represents nearly a 50% increase in the deck area over that approved previously by this board, although the side yard variances are not substantial and represent minimal change from the pre-existing location of the dwelling and applicants plan to keep the foundation in place and adjust the angles to square off the dwelling to the property. 4. The difficulty has been self-created S. No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 6. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a four foot extension of the open deck construction, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-13, motion was offered by Member Dinizio, seconded by Member Weisman, and duly carried, to GRANT the variance as applied for, as shown on the revised 2/6/06 partial site plan prepared by Meryl Kramer Architect, subject to the condition that the open roofed porch and deck remain open to the sky. Any deviation from the variance given such as extensions, or demolitions which are not shown on the appslcants diagrams or survey site maps, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconhxrroties under the z, ning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Oliva (Ch airw an), Goer ' er, izio, imon, a Weisman. This Resolution was duly adopted (5-0). i- Goehringer 4/25106 Approved/or Filing 2 M v • 0 jo PHOTO. 1 PARTIAL SITE PLAN BRANDVOLD RESIDENCE 1"= 49 REV. 2/8/06 M E R V L K R A M E R a r 0 n i t a 0 t 31 SOUTH STREET P.G. BOX 663 GREENPORT, kY 11040 631.477•!730 _ APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS • Ruth D. Oliva, Gerard P. Goehringer James Dinizio, Jr., Chaftum Michael A. Simon Leslie Kanes Weisman Qf S0Akc UjyO� • Mailing Address: Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road • P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex /First Floor, North Fork Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Vrrgv`D TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 • Fax (631) 765-9064 Q,n'1 . tJAR , FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF MARCH 8, 2007 SouEle r� ZB File No. 5996 — George and Jeanne Braun Property Location: 2005 Bayshore Road, Greenport CTM 53-4-11 SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEORA. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicants' 15,512 sq. ft. parcel has 50 feet along Bayshore Road and 301.94 feet in depth along the northerly (side) property line, and the property is improved with a two-story, single-family dwelling and accessory garage, shown on survey prepared by John T. Metzger, Land Surveyor dated September 7, 1999 (updated December 19, 2006 to show the proposed additions). BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for a Variance under Section 280-124, based on the Building Inspector's October 25, 2006 Notice of Disapproval concerning proposed additions to the existing dwelling at less than 10 feet on a single side yard and less than 25 feet for the combined side yards. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application has been referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its January 22, 2007 reply, stating this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county -wide or inter -community impact. TOWN CODE CHAPTER 95 12681 LWRP DETERMINATION: This application is determined exempt under Town Code Chapter 268-3(F) because the granting of setbacks are not related to a regulated natural feature or a bulkhead or other shoreline defense structure or any activity within the CEHA. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board'of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on February 22, 2007, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicants request variance relief for two side yard setbacks. Code requires 10 feet and 25 feet combined on lots of 20,000 feet or less and the side yards are proposed at 5.3 feet on a single side yard and 17 feet for combined side yard setbacks. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: Page 2 - March 8, 2007 Is Z$ File No. 5996 - George and Jell Braun CTM No. 53-4-11 1. Grant of the variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, as his neighbors are setback further than the applicants. The applicants wish to add two small rooms on the ground floor of his home. The new rooms would follow the existing building lines. The house is only 32' wide with a driveway. The proposed addition is a one floor addition of two rooms 12'x11' on either side of the front doorway. The roof over the doorway will be enlarged to be at the same footage as the 12' addition. The side yard setbacks will remain the same at 5.3' and 17' combined. Also, the front setbacks on Bayshore Road are variable. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The lot is only 50 feet side, and there is a need to expand for more living space. 3. The variance granted herein is not substantial. 4. The difficulty has been self-created, as the applicants acquired the property in 1988 and have had knowledge of limitations of building on a 50 -ft. wide lot. 5. No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential commurity will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 6. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of two additional rooms, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Oliva, seconded by Member Goehringer, and duly carried, to GRANT the relief as applied for, as shown on the survey prepared by John T. Metzger, Land Surveyor dated September 7, 1999, updated December 19, 2006, and building diagrams prepared by Penny Lumber, last amended August 3, 2006. Any deviation from the variance given such as extensions, or demolitions which are not shown on the applicant's diagrams or survey site maps, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subjed property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that Is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Dinizio (Chairman), Oliva, Goehringer, Simon, and Weisman. This Resolution was duly adopted (5-0). S '#.AQ -402'A -4 10 ,0115m es Dinizio Jr., Chqran / /1/2007 Approved for Filing f�loofdi�s: a/ 4.G v ry 0� 5 V s A�• fs10 SURVEY OF PROPERTY AT ARSHAMOMAQUE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK 1000-53-04-11 SCALE: 1'=40' SEPT. 7, 1999 14A 6, PDOO f klodoNon kc- J24.- c�s. /9, 2006 (/oI'n� ~&ww'/ • ) AREA = 15,512 sq. M to tie line ■ �monvment Lot ^umbers refer to "Amended Mop A, Peconic Boy Estates" Filed in the Suffolk County Clerks Office on May 19, 1933 as File No. 1124. FLOOD ZONE AE (el 8 �OFNEk,Y FLOOD ZONE FROM FIRM 6 yT• MET•, 36103CO139 G MAY 4996 ANY ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION O IC OF SECTI!W 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. i EXCEPT A3 PER SECTION 7209—SUBDIVISION 2. ALL CERTIFICATIONS ARE VALID FOR THIS MAP �^ ? X HEREON AND COPIES THEREOF ONLY 1F SAID MAP OR COPIES BEAR THE IMPRESSED SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR 723 WHOSE SWNATURE APPEARS HEREON. SOUTH LANG 971 IC, N0, 49618 631 ) 763 - 1797 99-301 Southold Town. Hall otard R Gught t►ger 13 5095 Main Road _ P.G. fox 11'799 404A Tortes, . ; Gebrge •F Ming O Southold, New York11Q 71-0959 RutbD. Clio ,ChWrwoman "'�,�► ZBA Fax. (631) 7b5-9064 merit r ido ; - Thlgftzs , (65 j 765-1809: http:/�soTiiii�'vt'otk.pec: BOARD OF APPEALS .' } TOWN OF SOUZHOLD1.8 W� FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION Nov ,. MEETING OF NOVEMBER 6, 2003 Cpl. No::$315—Linde.Pasbach. ,• K r� F: $ x ' l?ro 0n* 2005 Say $Hoke Road, Grbenport;. 53 1NA'�t!ON .The : ening Board . ofA009 fs has ki lied . t e . ( y; `wider cetnsid afYoii 1n`ttii9ppht�► aril d tar l s thsk.lhis.>tevlev fella. Wkw alp., Il v ithaut an ad�jeise ie #eCt on tF category of the State's LW. ai *ons, eff?Yiion iii if the' project is implementedsit:014h is ,' vYIRA . ' N dti• The applipagt's. 8,7E>a sc ft, } arow is shaiy�rR on the Map 11 3 Ia$ ) !� , vaith: 50, feet alopg the rtQ, sF+de:.4 y Sl�or ' k . - t: F Itjtrti i1�5•f tsood buik#iead. alori Pecsini�y,`,. , l is uniFoved � withta 1:•s story framed -shown on they site map prop +eci by MOW 11rramsr, •, tJ 'referring to survey dated:iidy: ,1978 preparesi by Roo rickP.E.Wi . �uJl#iing Department's nay 4 " 20 . 'Notice :of, . Disapproval, ?.� . f.ff �lhiat rtiting $ections 1 9.$, i1D l; +{ A►,.'af�d 100-244, of a builtlirrg �rftit ap�plicatlon tar construct:,, (1} an add[# wl hider yatds at less.than D j 25; ft�t.1. (2) to -ds built' deck addition. at less than: TS feat the bulkheaid, and (3) ? atld!'tldrNMd.ydeck with a lot•coverago in.e*pess pf..f�.600 1sT tloh of zOx of the lot slie. i f FINDINGS OF FACT Teb ir) Bgard of• Appeals :held a. public hearinE; on this, application on October 23, Ztfl =t hi�r,.� v�Ftti�n and:041 ey1dence were prtesented. Ba"d..upon. all. testimony, :.d #i iort, r { nel ftoectioti of the property,.and other evidence, the Zoning Board flri r; a;f hiivri 4 Qd#s to :be true and rplevaht: t\I'. C Ep, l't uESTED:. Applicant Is requesting variances for: (1) a. new r he-southw,,est seation.witft! a setback.of 39.3 feet to the front lot line e.p opeirtyalne,:leaving a total of 15.6' for both sides; "(2) an as Wit. kt ,ttiR°at; .7 ' tr*M the bulkhead, and (3) a total lot coverage of 2T:589/0. if 1C 13 AL 'I ill F idMAt16W:A VENDED RELIEF: During the August 21, 2003 public "apo Ica t wa7r. requeeted.to "sh a breakdown of this.building:area alarifyipil the original request of 33+-y6 Iot coverage noted in the May 12, 2003 and July 17, 2003 • - No)tj t ippta ai. _ pri Ocober, 22,.2003. the appIleant's architect furnished a revised tt boi:c►vge oalcuiations and an Cletober 1fi, 2003 amended Notice of spt;ysrage of 27.58616, or ?430 sq. fit., Which was. accepted by n.. tlsa'i .irr Qotober 16, 2003 amended Notice o Disapproval: ! !`lSOAi�b 7r1G'fiDN DESC BED BELOW: Based on the testimony and IWO O'BoWd d6d oersonal-Inspection, the Board makes the following findings: Fuge 2 November 8;2003 App1 No 5375 -I ind9 Fastrai i &W53-6-4 ''1.. Grant of the, area. variance will not produce an undesirable change in character of ttgholGi, da detrlmdnt. to Nearby properties. The. as -built desk measures. { 'spsprb7hr�ate 13'x30';and.'is tocated do the watentiew side cii tris l olrss at ►f►otim tile; pu each Tli}; pFopoed . nein► addidort itteastrres .11 r�i 3" and fa Short t_'fiee .: addition *IU be siir . story. for a master bedrooiiri This proposasl: add iouktfincr art lrs. noli-cbnfocrhing lot cove frr�in 26A%to X7.5$°%: -L The bene if sbu Ctt+tib thn app crit a an be achieved by some method, to+isible for, rbii = hart[ gr" Maria, `Xhe ba -built d Batscist�9 for some pmts;{ " aPia"ai iiC#:pll efrlirrtt s;omrirxrnl ear°:Alae thisiartow irra., .t!glmrihli stds Yai�d.'ssltiaiCke which .des riot: allow . : Or a �ir+lti n tiie newadditionvau7d be ipw: 3 1U0i".v.Arfslr�e: jb* the. deck is sudstantiai- in relation to the code required r8:"Q TOX r+eduiany, tFie requested`rellef for the addition rs f bii -- ai1; in ease, pf 1 in- l6t . t06*e avoir thea dtxistlrrg,. and. a Ye7f n dfs m'thli: QtaJ siElsyfAk f is the existing 19;6 feet fb 15.6 fest. 4' tho d1!I' .r%yAvra' sMt-c:rc.�:acl V+11011 thdroro llsoo Was acqui ed'aild the deck was built wilhoul consultinll the endo rcuidauornc tbrAfia aa-l�liit deck alnd'6n addi 16h designed . W:riiuot conlonnity ro she ionaq; roy.i.reiri�nt is�i9i %Viidonce"tFt i{ the grant of the variirice•will. have ad adverse effect or ir`hoact.- `` on the physical or environmental conditions In the neighlorhtood'or district. The bulkhead .f separates the nc+rw construction from the beach area, on the Waterside- of the applicant's bulkhead. The environmental agencies of the. Tawn and State nave •been consulted and iSs is +kitFFilr it t to appli6w& requests. 4• d I E► cosiderin$ elf of the above factors and applying the. b,te�l i♦I :! r:QT iN4. ,267+x, inotlon was offered by Member Orlando t [ ud iMals tle iiy etirt�se Gaehrirtgen and duly carried, to 7. view- as ap.p1*0 for, as 'shown on the Qctolier 20, 2003 schematic ta+tNe rjefl lY Msrltl K mfr, Archlteci, with,the conoitlon that the c: �lirhita tp : 7.5ii�G as khown on the architect's breakdown date - g bar 22� 003 and. with: the condition that a certificate of itu #ott a +i#Eing area(a) shal>�be Issued beforeakpanslon. . This aeon. not;aut io p9e ar,00ndone any current or tuture'use, setback or. other �t:�gp y feature elf he i`that m#Y violate,the Zoning Code, other than such uses, l 1 dtbacks'and of fsaturi Was are expressly addressed in this action. b ftte?:Boatd a#. ifr rrrb S.Oiia► {Chalmrdm �);Ooe�iririger, Tuttora, and.OirW i rahj. J sient iiv s't� n r Thi dill , §PfOo Ruth D. Oli*-ChiMrwcman. Ill##03'. 3 3i3 Rw►�' Approved WrIliing tt. 7a; i ►rBULKHEW LOT 50 mc o EXIST a? FRECE. Va�E j.° BRICK vino n 14 a 1 tw-w FXIST. 11/2 STORY HOUSE �- c pI ].6 6 LOT 51 JUL 2 3 2403 BRi K WALK --FENCE 6' N IRYADDITION p v 0 e FENCE SON---- - ----T— I I I --FENCE 6- S S 23. 52' E 50.0 \-1380 64 TO ISLAND MEIN LANE i SAYSHORE ROAD FASBACH RESIDENCE SCHEMATIC DESIGN AMUIDED 07/23/03 PROPOSED SITE M E R Y L K R A M E R a r a h i t e a t 124 BROAD STREET @REEMP'ORT, MY ii944 Bi31-477-6-736 i BOARD MEMBERS Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson James Dinizio Gerard P. Goehringer George Horning Ken Schneider Southol4 Town Hall 53095 Main Rcad -P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex /First Floc; Capital One Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown.nonhfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RECEIVED Tel. (631) 765-1809 - Fax (631) 765-9064 1_ v d ,3 , y 3 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF OCTOBER 7, 2010 SouEow Clerk ZBA FILE # 6409 NAME OF APPLICANT: Dahna M. Basilice PROPERTY LOCATION: 3255 Bayshore Road (adj. to Peconinc Bay) Greenport, NY SCTM#1000-53-6-8 SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated July 13, 2010 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county -wide or inter -community impact. LWRP: The variance relief requested in this application is listed under the Minor Actions exempt list and is not subject to review under Chapter 268. PROPERTY FACTSWESCRIPTION: Subject parcel is a non -conforming 10,848 sq. ft. lot in the R-40 zone. The parcel is improved with a one story dwelling, attached patio and hot tub and an accessory shed. It has 75 feet of frontage on Bayshore Rd., 144.86 feet along the northern property line, 75 feet on Peconic Bay and 144.42 feet on the southern property line as shown on the survey dated January 4, 2010 prepared by John T. Metzger, LS. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variance from Code Sections 280-15, based on an application for building permit and the Building Inspector's May 4, 2010 Notice of Disapproval concerning proposed construction of accessory garage, at 1) less than the code required side yard setback of 20 feet, 2) less than the code required front yard setback of 35 feet, 3) more than the code required maximum lot coverage of 20%. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant proposes to remove the existing shed and construct a 519 sq. ft. accessory garage requiring variances for a proposed IS foot front yard setback where the code requires 35 feet, proposed 5 foot side yard setback where the code requires 20 feet and proposed lot coverage of 26% whe. _- the code allows a maximum of 20%. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: At the Public Hearing the Board requested the agent to provide information regarding setbacks and lot coverage for garages on other properties in the neighborhood and the location of the water line for the subject parcel. On September 28, 2010, the Board received the requested information. Under a prior appeal #4678 the applicant was granted lot coverage of 25%. Page 2 — October 7, 2010 ZBA Filed6409 - Basilice CTM: 1000-53-6-8 FINDINGS OF FACT/ REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application September, 23, 2010, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1, Town Law 8267-b(3NWD, Grant of the alternative relief will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. There are several homes in the neighborhood with garages located in the front yard of their properties because their rear yards are fronting the water. The proposed accessory garage will be totally screened from view from the street and side yard by existing, mature evergreen vegetation. 2. Town Law 8267-b(&b)(2), The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by sorr.r. method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance because the lot is small and located on the water which further restricts the placement of an accessory structure on the property. Furthermore, the location of the existing house makes the location of any accessory structure in the front yard require a variance. 3. Town Law 8267-b(3)(b)(3). The alternate relief for the side yard setback granted herein is substantial representing a 60% variance from the code required 20 feet,. The variance requested for the front yard setback is a 57% variance from the code requirement of 35 feet and is also substantial. However, due to the existing location of the dwelling and the water line for the house from the street, the proposed location is the only feasible place for an accessory garage. The proposed increase by 1% in the existing 25% lot coverage is not substantial on this small, 10,848 sq. ft. non -conforming lot 4. Town Law 8267-b(3),(bN4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The agent for the applicant provided documentation that shows similar setbacks on the properties within 500 feet in both directions from the subject property. 5. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. This property has had the benefit of two prior variances, the first in 1996 (appl # 4409) was for an addition to the rear (water side) of the house extending the setback from 53 feet to 49 feet. This addition was never built. The second variance (appl # 4678) was for an existing raised patio that exceeded the minimum lot coverage by 5% and reduced the setback from the bulkhead from 53 feet to 20 feet. However, this request is for a proposed accessory garage in the conforming front yard requiring front and side yard setbacks and a 1% additional increase in lot coverage that ar:: common in this neighborhood of small waterfront properties. 6. Town Law 8267-b. Grant of alternative relief, is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a two car garage while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Dinizio, seconded by Member Goehringer, and duly carried, to GRANT the requested variance for the front yard setback and lot coverage as applied for. DENY, the 5 foot side yard setback as applied for, and GRANT ALTERNATIVE RELIEF as noted below: 1) The side yard setback shall be 8 feet from the property line. Before applying for a buildingpermit, the applicant or agent must submit to the Board of Appeals for approval and filing, two sets of the final survey conforming to the alternative relief granted herein. The ZBA will forward one set of approved, stamped drawings to the Building Department. Failure to follow this procedure may result in the delay Page 3 — October 7, 2010 ZBA File#6409 - Basilice CTM: 1000-53-6-9 or denial of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance given such as extensions, or demolitions which are not shown on the apf:licant's diagrams or survey site maps, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoni.,g code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Weisman (Chairperson), Goehringer, Diniaio, Schneider. (Member Horning by telephone, no voting rights) This Resolution was duly adopted (4-0). C--4- /Ixw mu -,L Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Approved for Filing/0 / /a/2010 RECE V .D -3 .. y3 Southold 'Sown Clerk LOT COVERAGE EX►STMMG HOUSE - 203 sVL SHED - 102 2q.1► 23/3 sq. 1. 2YSR0648 sp.11,r 21.3% PROPOSED HOUSE' 2213 SHED TO BE REMOVED PROP. GARAGE 62/ $411. 2634#084' * Z'j GI Ot/ ''11 66.09?�,� 1. 11 \ AREA= 10848 sq.11. to lie line LOT NUMBERS ARE REFFREHCED TO AMEhOED MAP A - PECONPC BAY ESTATES' FILED N THE OFFICE OF THE SlArFOLK CO/NVTY CLERK AS IUP NO. 1124 L OT 56 SAA 86. Pip i�00 > _I:a � 5g LOT _17 X11 RECEIVED 7� QZ DEC 6 20}0 / BOARD OF APPEALS � N w CERTOWD TO, vmcEwsucE RASLICE . ISLAND VIEW LANE FLOOD ZONES FROM FRM 36103CO159 H 19/231^_ FINAL MAP REVIEWED BY ZBA SEE DECISION / Igqoq DATEDf,o_----------------- SURVEY OF PROPERTY A T GREENPORT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. 1000-33-06-08 Scale: Y' = 20' Jan. 4; 2010 NOV. 3, 2010 (PROP. GARAGE) P O BOX 909w r 4r-�iyi SOUTHTRA AD, H.Y. 170'9-9-416 �/ it , , ti ArPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman James Dinizio, Jr. Lydia A. Tortora Lora S. Collins George Horning BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF OCTOBER 4, 2001 Appl. No. 4994 — ED AND EILEEN MAHER Street & Location: 3655 Bayshore Road, Greenport 1000-53-06-15 Date of Public Hearing: September 20, 2001; October 4, 2001 Findings of Fact Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Tele -;hone (631) 765-1809 PROPERTY FACTS: The subject parcel contains 6,696 sq. ft. of land area and is improved with a frame single-family dwelling and frame garage, as detailed on the February 13, 2001 survey prepared by John T. Metzger, L.S. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Article XXIII, Section 100-242A and Section 100-2448, based on the Building Department's July 27, 2001 Notice of Disapproval for the reason the structural alterations and additions to existing dwelling with an increase in the degree of nonconformance with regard to the nonconforming side yards and lot overage exceeding the 20% code limitation. RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant requests variances authorizing alterations and addition to the existing dwelling. The dwelling as exists contains nonconforming side yards at 7.1 feet on the south side and variables of 3.87 ft. and 6.4 feet on the north side. The original request was based on a site plan dated 4-18-01, prepared by Meryl Kramer, Architect, for a covered porch, two-story addition, and a two-story addition over the existing nonconforming dwelling location. The lot coverage requested on the 4-18-01 plan was 27.32% of the total lot area. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: At the hearing on September 20, 2001, the applicant discussed lesser variances with Board Members, and an altemative plan was prepared for Board consideration. At the Board's request, the site plan was revised (September 24, 2001). The September 24, 2001 revised plan shows a smaller two-story addition, after removal of the existing stoop and porch areas at the west and east ends of the house, and a lot coverage reduced from 27.32% to 24.8%. Board Members explained their concerns with the northwest comer of the house, and confirmed that the northerly 3.87 ft. nonconforming setback shall not be two-story, and that the roof line shall be at one-story with a general higher slope. The architect for the applicant acquiesced and agreed to design a roof line that will not have a two-story effect into the side yard. BOARD REASONS: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspection, the Board makes the following findings: Page 2 — October 4, 2001 • Appl. No. 4994 — E. Maher Southold Town Board of Appeals REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION DESCRIBED BELOW On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspection, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Grant of the area variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The garage and house have been in place for 40 years, and are an established part of the neighborhood. There will be no intrusion into either side yard with a lesser setback. The lot is very small leaving no other area for expansion. The site plan was revised to reduce the lot wverage to 24.8%, which is more in keeping with,the general area and small lots of this size. 2. The benefit sought by applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for appellant to pursue, other than area variances due to the size of the property and established building locations. 3. The requested area variances are not substantial. 4. Grant of the variances will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. There was no evidence presented to suggest that the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood would be adversely impacted. 5. The action set forth below is the minimum necessary and adequate to enable applicant to enlarge the dwelling and replace existing step and porch areas, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. BOARD RESOLUTION: On motion offered by Member Dinizio, seconded by Member Tortora, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the variance as requested and more particu%arty shown on the September 24, 2001 amended site plan prepared by Meryl Kramer, R.A., SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Page 3 — October 4, 2001 ' Appl. No. 4994 — E. Maher Southold Town Board of Appeals 1) The area of the building at the northwest comer which exists at less than 10 ft. from the side property tine shall not be at a height greater than one-story height, and the second -story addition for this existing_ protrusion of the house is denied. 2) The lot coverage shall not exceed 24.8%, as requested. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. VOTE OF THE BOARD: AYES: Goehringer Izio, T ora,/dCoResolution was duly adopted (4-0). ERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN 10/11/01 KEENED --� lt*y .,vU"j I LD TOZrtd CIL, D1>TE 101fz,o) 3� y f TOWn Clerk SIUR, ���4' TOWN su t 64 13? s "uN" ` scmz: 1 1 4p M. lg _ c Is 11 "� cam• 73'00'40vcE,, 2 ! N IA 64• 1 ? GM! CL r AZ '1' CL 0' GOR ss Te �� Le e• uµL. Lpt 65 �& • � � � � coRgsVa.- CL @. 13g.ZZ . W ^� re C 66 LOTLAUG i! 62001 cl se S 73.00 F LOT NUMBERS REFER Tp 'AMEN MAP A"7°ECL7IViC BAY ESTATES' FILED IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE ON MAY 19, 1933 AS MAP NO. 1124 w m A ELEVATIONS REFERENCED TO N.G.V.D. FLOOD ZONE AE (oG 81 FLOOD ZONE FAkEN FROM FIRbI �M 3610.300139 G MAY !i, 1998. t�Of NE{yK IM"D MW l NJr S.. 4 61 ! ANY ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THIS SURVEY IS A VTOLATIDN OP SECTION 7P09 OF THE NEV YORK STATE` EDUCATION LAW. ALL �r AREA= 6,696 ECONIC S VEY P:; (631) 765 5020 P. O• BOX 909 Fry - EXCEPT AS PER SECTION 7209-SCtBDIVIVDN 2. CERTIFICATIONS HEREON ARE VALID FOR. THIS MAP AND COPIES THEREOF ONLY IF .S. TO TIL, q 1?30 TRAVELER STR � SAID MAP OR COPIES BEAR THE IMPRESSED SM OF THE SURVEYUR Lii1YE SOUTHOLD, N;Y. 11971 WHOSE SIGNAiUR :APPEARS ., REQN, .... i ,._ , ^''a BOARD MEMBERS Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson James Dinizio, Jr. Gerard P. Goehringer George Horning Ken Schneider uf souT� http://southoldtown.northfork.net Southo! J Town Hall 53095 Main Road -P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex /First Floor, Capital One Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS R E V TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -1- 9'.070 Tel. (631) 765-1809 - Fax (631) 765-9064 JUL 2272W ii�e*m_bwl FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF JULY 19, 2012 ZBA FILE: 6556 NAME OF APPLICANT: Richard and Susan Meyerholz SCTM# 1000-53-06-23 PROPERTY LOCATION: 4245 Bay Shore Road (adj. to Pipes Cove), Greenport, NY SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type 11 category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated March 6, 2012 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county -wide or inter -community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated April 28, 2012. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is INCONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. However, the Board finds that the alternative relief granted herein with the conditions cited below, will bring the application into greater consistency with LWRP Policy standards 1, 4.1, and 5, thereby making the application CONSISTENT with the LWRP. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: Subject parcel is a 7,526 sq. ft. non -conforming lot in the R40 zone. It is improved with a one story seasonal dwelling. It has 45.00 feet of frontage on Bayshore Road, 147.81 feet along the north property line, 58.04 feet along Pipes Cove and 146.21 feet along the southern property line as shown on the site plan prepared by Robert 1. Brown, RA, dated 7/2/12. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article XXIII Code Section 280.124, based on an application for building permit and the Building Inspector's January 12, 2012, amended June 18, 2012 Notice of Disapproval concerning proposed demolition and reconstruction of a single family dwelling, at; 1) less than the code required front yard setback of 35 feet, 2) less than the code required minimum side yard setback of 10 feet, 3) less than the code required total combined side yards of 25 feet, 4) more than the code permitted lot coverage of 20% maximum. RELIEF REOUESTED: The applicant requests variances to demolish the existing dwelling and reconstruct a new two story dwelling with a single side yard setback of 3.4 feet where the code requires 10 feet and combined side yards of 9.9 feet where the code requires 25 feet, a front yard setback of 31.6 feet where the code requires 35 feet and lot coverage of 28.9% where the code permits 20% maximum. Page 2 of 3 — July 19, 2012 ZBA File#6556 - Meyerholz CTM: 1000-53-6-23 AMENDED APPLICATION: During the May 3, 2012 hearing, the applicant was asked to bring the plan into more conformity with the code. The applicant, on May 24, 2012, submitted a plan increasing the front yard setback to 32.5 feet, the single side yard setback to 5 feet, the combined side yard setback to 10 feet, and reducing the lot coverage to 26.9%. The applicant also removed the proposed spa on the southerly side and re -located it to a seaward position toward the north of the property The Board finds that this amended plan still requires significant variances for the side yard, combined side yard and lot coverage. At the July 5, 2012 public hearing the applicant was asked to bring the plan into more conformity with the code for the setbacks and lot coverage, and, to mitigate potential adverse environmental impacts, to comply with the recommendations made by the LWRP coordinator in his letter dated April 28, 2012 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Under ZBA file #414 in 1961, the property owner at that time was granted a side yard setback variance for a one story dwelling. At the May 3, 2012, public hearing, the adjoining property owners to the south stated they were not in favor of the requested variances and noted the close proximity to their dwelling and noise concern regarding the proposed hot tub location. FINDINGS OF FACT/ REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on May 3, 2012, June 7, 2012 and July 5, 2012, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law §267-bs3)(b)(1). Grant of the requested side yard variance will produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. What the applicant proposes in design and scope is not uncharacteristic of this neighborhood in which many homes have been renovated and enlarged over time. However, most 2 story dwellings along the waterfront side of Bay Shore. Road are on larger lots with conforming lot coverage and setbacks. Because of the size and shape. of the applicant's small parcel, and the size and location of the proposed new two story dwelling indicated in the amended plans, the Board finds that the proposed close proximity that would be created by a 5 foot southerly side yard setback from the existing adjacent two story dwelling to the south, would cause a detriment to both dwellings. The Board also notes that the applicant's lot is among the smallest in the area and that the demolition of the existing one story dwelling with a conforming 19.3% lot coverage, and replacement with the proposed two story dwelling at 26.91;'0 lot coverage per the amended site plan, will substantially increase the degree of non-conformance on the subject F -ircel. 2. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The parcel is nonconforming at 7,526 square feet with a front yard width of 45 feet. The proposed demolition and reconstruction of a larger dwelling than what exists cannot be located on this parcel where it would not require a variance. 3. Town Law 6267-b(3)(b)(3). The variances requested in the amended plan, except for the front yard setback relief, are mathematically substantial. The requested front yard setback of 32.5 feet represents a 7% relief from the code required 35 feet, which is not substantial. The requested side yard setback of 5 feet represents a 50% relief from the code, which is substantial. The Board also notes that an outdoor shower and set of deck steps are proposed in the 5 foot southerly side yard setback. The requested combined side yard relief of 10 feet represents a 60% relief from the code, which is substantial. The requested lot coverage of 26.9% represents a 34.5% relief from the code, which is substantial. 4. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's storm water management code and the Town's drainage code and must obtain permits from FEMA and the Department of Health. Page 3 of 3 —July 19, 2012 ZBA File#6556 - Meyerholz CTM: 1000-53-6-23 5. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant acquired the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. 6. Town Law 4267-b. Grant of alternative relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a demolition and reconstruction of a dwelling while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Schneider, seconded by Member Goehringer, and duly carried, to DENY as applied for, and GRANT ALTERNATIVE RELIEF, as follows: 1. Front Yard setback equal to or greater than 32.5 feet. 2. Side yard setback at northern property line equal to or greater than 6.5 feet. 3. Side yard setback at southern property line equal to or greater than 8.0 feet. 4. Combined side yard setback equal to or greater than 14.5 feet. 5. Total lot coverage not to exceed 26%. CONDITIONS: I . The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's storm water management and drainage codes. 2. The applicant must install landscape wells around existing trees within the area to be filled with 18" of beach material, per LWRP recommendation 3. The proposed hot tub and outdoor shower must be connected to a drywell for onsite control of drainage of spa and shower water. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. Before applying for a building Hermit. the applicant or agent must submit to the Board of Appeals for approval and filing, two sets of the final site plan, architectural drawings and recalculation of lot coverage conforming to the alternative relief granted herein. The ZBA will forward one set of approved, stamped drawings to the Building Department. Failure to follow this procedure may result in the delay or denial of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance(s) granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the rightto substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote ofthe Board: Ayes: Members Weisman (Chairperson). Goehringer, Dinizio, Schneider. Horning. This Resolution was duly adopted (5-0). f4� �.,k44 Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing 7 /;t /2012 N W E G G A - te. QRpf 05`1 0 6�'6 _� i 0� Hou% �ouo ma p0 7G wowNG ) 5'DIA. HOT TU6P ON G,ADE. k1 C O PROP05ED ADDITION OF q 18' OF BEACH �t MATERIAL ^x � �IgTING LP f.f. oRvea. LP ` ST NMS ~ ^ r 3° I I'08'%N wnc rpm. LOT # 78 ADJACENT AREA (DWELLING U/C) (ENTIRE LOT): BASED ON IT # 77 5URVEY OF PROPERTY HOU5E: AT AR5HAMOMOQUE _ TOWN OF 5OUTHOLD )LAND VIEW LANE 5UFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. 1` 1000 - 53 - Or. - 23 BEACH FILL: ± 81 C.Y. FEBRUARY 9. 2010 PROP05ED 5TRUCTURE MARCH 03, 2010 (REV15ED) HOU5E: AREA - 7,526 5Q.FT. /� + TO TIE UNE 1'"=�0''2-OV 38 g2 14-715" _l u, w° ADJACENT AREA (ENTIRE LOT): 7526 5F. IT # 77 HOU5E: 1052 5F. ZONE AE 1 (fL. G) 401 5F. TOTAL EXI5TING RECEIVED 1` 1453 5F. BEACH FILL: ± 81 C.Y. 0 PROP05ED 5TRUCTURE ""'-G-D DRYWELL FOR HOT ND BACK WA5H „��-; • �� r r �� •'� 14r,.2 1, root euReac Q EXI"NG 5TRUCTURE • FIR5T FLOOR TO BE RAISED TO ELEV, 8-0' EXISTING DOCK .1 5 5ECTION, not to 5cale PROP05ED BALCONY OVER EXI5TING DECK Nora AL SuRm ONG OK61"swfNM I" ryv[ fte" w.mt MEAN HIGH WATER MAF LV 1 V V V L IN'117L ADJACENT AREA (ENTIRE LOT): 7526 5F. EX15TING STRUCTURE HOU5E: 1052 5F. DECK: 401 5F. TOTAL EXI5TING RECEIVED COVERAGE: 5F.- % 1453 5F. BEACH FILL: ± 81 C.Y. = 19.3% PROP05ED 5TRUCTURE HOU5E: 1215 5F. DECK.254 5F. FRONT OVERHANG: 38 g2 5F. TOTAL PROP05ED COVERAGE: 1909 5F. a 25.3% Q4 DRAINAGE CALCULATION TOTAL IMPERV.LOT COVERAGE: 1500.2 S.F. x .17x1 = 255 G.F. PROVIDE 2aa. 8' DIA. x 3'-G'D. DRY WELLS. RECEIVED PROPOSED VOLUMN SEP 2 g 2012 BEACH FILL: ± 81 C.Y. BOARD OF APPEALS 09/25/2012 MEYERHOLZ RE5IDENCE 5CALE: 1"=2(y-0* 12/02/2010 REV. 5/3/1 1 REV. 2121112 ``--� Robert I. Brown Architect, P.C. PROPOSED ADDITION Of MAX. G' NATURAL LOCAL BEACH 5TOW.NO w/ Fairweather De51cjn A55oclate5, Inc. 5MALLERTKANy'AND NOLARGER 205 BAY AVENUE TOTAL A THAN Z* TO Ex15TING. GREENPORT, N.Y. 1 1944 PPROX.X. 27 27 C.Y. G31-477-9752 (Fax) G31-477-0973 SURVEYED FOR: GARY & KATHLEEN ZUAR PROPERTY LOCATED AT ARSHAMONADUE LOT No. 31 & P/0 30 AS SHOWN ON AMENDED MAP "A" PECONIC BAY ESTATES FILED: MAY 19. 1933: FILE No. 1124 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK S.C.T.M. # 1000-53-4-9 TOTAL LOT AREA 29.550 SF = 0.6764 ACRES UPLAND AREA = 16,464 SF. SCALE: 1"=40 NOTE: THE EXISTENCE OF RIGHT OF WAYS. WETLANDS AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD IF ANY. NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED. COVERAGE CALCULATION: HOUSE = 1.429 SF. DECKS.PORCHS = 890 SF 1.429 + 890 = 2.319 SF 2.319/29.550 = 0.085 2.319/16,464 = 0.141% UPLAND AREA C PROPOSED COVERAGE CALCULATION: , A HOUSE WITH PROP ADDITIONS = 1904.6 SF. GARAGE = 576 SF. PROP PORCHS 472.6 + 230.4 = 703 SF. t�1, EXISTING DECK 450.9 SF. STEPS & LANDING 49.8 + 94 = 143.8 SF. 'q SHOWER = 34.4 SF FINISHED GRADE 0� INLET 1' MIN. FROM SEPTIC TANK 64� 2' MAX. I/8• P < ITCH 4' DIA MIN w m CLASS 2480 ro' 8.0 DIA LEACHING POOL a = 3.0' MIN cn COLLAR 0 a: w 0 0 0 0 0 DEPTH m 0 0 0 0 0 8.0 DIA LEACHING POOL a O O r=11\XROSSOVER 4.0' m PIPES DEPTH J IN 0 w x BACKFILL WITH a. CLEAN SAND AND GRAVEL MATERIAL GROUND WATER 6 TYPICAL SANITARY LEACHING POOL (N.T.S.) WETLAND FLAGS BY SHAWN BARRON 6-11-2013 WALL r5> �\1tiL 0.4'/N CONC. c� RETAIN. 0��01 WALL 0 WALL 7� �I x PROPOSED 0.8'/N 6` ' �lv� OO ENCLOSED p •� •, 9 Ov O � , PORCH EXIST. D 4j ��� I ti RES r 9.8'/S 9 ••rye' 4 � •osp ' ti PROPOSED ��'' - # ,-f� '•, 2 STY ADDITION +fog mCO PORCH '. 'LW �0 r F ~ Ifo F Q ,yam Iv, 6` '8 '8 SI•� 6 5RE013E \ pp�RF g S.20 F BEACH AREA VEGETATED AREA tK Ot` tK '010.F'/S ti� iO�p� BFs�iffsr yQ �e 00 FENCE 10.5' �� ~ �sFFBtipti� e �O 1.2'/N WETLANDS/ � RETAINING WALL TOTAL 1904.6+ +f'03+450.9+ ��� 0�s�• �ti 'Oos� 143.8+34.4 = 3812.70 � oA m ,s ��:_ .. .EXIST. GARAGE POLE1L 3812.7/16.464 = 23% (UPLAND AREA) ••• LP L 8 �.� �' s HSE ! �S• 10.4'/N n�2 5� 10'/S t:' L LP ,` :' L EP PROPOSED Its m , LANDING � TEST HOLE DATA (NOT TO SCALE) BY: ROY K. REISSIG. PE 6-8-2013 011:00 AM GRADE EL.- 7.5 (NAVD 1988) 0.0' - 0.3' TOP SOIL PT ul 0.3' - 3.0' SILTY SAND SM co 3.0' - 6.5' 6.5' - 9.0' BROWN SAND SW WET SAND SW AND GRAVEL TEST HOLE :f j, �E DW •. J� SHOWER I�r ��. B,Q '1 •'f .A 10.2'/N 6' PROPOSED r� •� •'• PROP. GA GE O� O OUTSIDE S 69. ail, >'� (c �- c� d 4j:,0 LOCKING CASTING TO GRADE 0� 24' 1' MIN. 24" 2' MAX. fb 1�4• PITCH 20' 20' 6' MIN TOP 4' DIA CLASS 28 0 MIN. PIP r° OR EGUIVALENr DIA. SEPTIC TANK TYPICAL RECTANGULAR SEPTIC TANK SLAB I/8• PIrCH 4' DIA MIN CLASS 248.0 PIPE OR EOUIVALENT SURVEYED BY: PAUL BARYLSKI LAND SURVEYING PATCHOGUE NY 11772 PHONE 631-294-6985 FAX 631-627-3166 PAULBARYLSKIoYAH00.COM JUNE 5. 2013 2-4-2014:PROP ADDITIONS �•� • �5 SHOWER PIPE ��J ,ti4�' pQ��r POLE A�c.O \ 4• ' �p Qp�ti DW '' Off. '`> 17 4(c`;` ,. f,' V 10' 4' X 8 15' 8' DIA 20' MIN. 10' MIN. 7LcF vE DW �h0 .• �,�� PIPING , SEPTIC TANK, PIPING L.P. GRADING , GRADING F O \ • • • • Ftl EO ,, • � 0 Ow 01 PO E ��. �j• UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION DEPTH m c0 ;J 0 4- m .z LL w co m 4.0' m E L DEPTH 10.0' DIA. SEPTIC TANK TYPICAL RECTANGULAR SEPTIC TANK SLAB I/8• PIrCH 4' DIA MIN CLASS 248.0 PIPE OR EOUIVALENT SURVEYED BY: PAUL BARYLSKI LAND SURVEYING PATCHOGUE NY 11772 PHONE 631-294-6985 FAX 631-627-3166 PAULBARYLSKIoYAH00.COM JUNE 5. 2013 2-4-2014:PROP ADDITIONS �•� • �5 SHOWER PIPE ��J ,ti4�' pQ��r POLE A�c.O \ 4• ' �p Qp�ti DW '' Off. '`> 17 4(c`;` ,. f,' V 10' 4' X 8 15' 8' DIA 20' MIN. 10' MIN. 7LcF vE DW �h0 .• �,�� PIPING , SEPTIC TANK, PIPING L.P. GRADING , GRADING F O \ • • • • Ftl EO ,, • � 0 Ow 01 PO E ��. �j• UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION DEPTH m ti`s Co. 1 o 0 C3 o OF SECTION TM OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. c` t t ".-,,FF. E L COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING THE LAND SURVEYORS INKED . o _ DR EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED TO BE A VALID TRUE COPY.�_r LOCKING CASTING 3.0' MM. GUARANTEES OR CERTIFICATIONS INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN ONLY TO J g� TO GRADE Oh PROP. GROUND � EXISTING eGRADE THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE SURVEY IS PREPARED. AND ON HIS BEHALF TO 3 1.5 rm THE TITLE COMPANY. GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY AND LENDING INSTITUTION < 1' MIN MITH 1' MIN AREA OF PROPOSED LISTED HEREON. AND TO THE ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDING INSTITUTION GUARANTEES OR CERTIFICATIONS ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE TO ADDITIONAL u 1C P17-CH ? 2' MAX 2' 4• DIA 2' MAX INSTITUTIONS OR SlBSEOIENT OWNERS. GROUND WATER ? 2 GRD. WATER PROPOSED MIN. s lNN • ,' DIA SEPTIC TAN 1/8• D O O O C7 ��•s < MIN. Irb C3 CD C3 o .o w vl� :1i G 0th' HOUSE ROOF AREA: 2284 SO. FT.. AT 2' RAIN/HR.: FLOOD ZONE FROM FIRM s� FEMA MAP # 36103CO159 COMMUNITY T/0 SOUTHOLD 360813 ELEVATIONS = NAVD 1988 1271-2AM 382 CU. FT.. 6' DIA. TOTAL ORYWELL VERTICAL FEET REQUIRED: 121TOTAL CAPACITY: 507.0 CU. FT.) TWO - 6' DEEP x 8' DIA GARAGE ROOF AREA: 711 SO. FT.. AT 2' RAIN/HR. 119 CU. FT.. B' DIA. TOTAL DRYWELL VERTICAL FEET REQUIRED: 4' (TOTAL CAPACITY: 169.0 CU. FT.) ONE - 4' DEEP x 8' DIA DRIVEWAY AREA: 2112 SO. FT.. AT 2' RAIN/HR.: 353 CU. FT., 8' DIA. ORYWELL VERTICAL FEET REOUIRED: t -u .,-10* (TOTAL CAPACITY: 422.5 CU. FT.) TWO- 5' DEEP x 8' DIA 1 DEPTH m ti`s Co. 1 o 0 C3 o < o 3.0• MIN A.(. m ? 3.0' MM. C COLLAR 00 COLLAR 1.5 rm a _=BACKFILL MITH HIGHEST CLEAN SAND ANO/- EXPECT GRAVEL MATERIAL GROUND WATER ,( GRD. WATER SANITARY SYSTEM DETAIL