Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-1.-2-6.5
OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY 11971 L_4 MAILING ADDRESS:" P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Leslie Weisman, Chair Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: April 24, 2014 Re: Coastal Consistency Review for ZBA File Ref RALPH M. CARBONE, JR. and LAURYN F. CARBONE #6746 SCTM#1000-1-2-6.5 RALPH M. CARBONE, JR. and LAURYN F. CARBONE #6746 - Request for Variances from Articles III and XXII, Sections 280-15, 280-13 and 280-116B and the Building Inspector's January 10, 2014, amended January 14 2014, March 17, 2014 and April 2 2014 Notice of Disapproval based on a building permit application for an 'as built' accessory in -ground swimming pool and proposed accessory pool house, at; 1) 'as built' swimming pool and proposed pool house location in other than the code required rear yard, 2) more than the code permitted one dwelling on each lot, pool house by design constitutes as a second dwelling unit, 3) 'as built' in -ground swimming pool located at less than the code required bluff setback of 100 feet, 4) proposed pool house at less than the code required bluff setback of 100 feet, located at: No# East End Road, (aka Castle Road) (adj. to Block Island Sound) Fishers Island, NY. SCTM#1000-1-2-6.5 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed actions are CONSISTENT with the LWRP policies and therefore are CONSISTENT with the LWRP based on the following: 1. Aerial analysis indicates that the swimming pool was constructed between the years 1962 and 1978 prior to the enactment of Chapter 111, Coastal Erosion Hazard Area (Figure 1.). Chapter 111 was adopted by the Town Board in 1991. 1 cannot determine if the pool was subject to the 100' setback from the top -of -bluff in Chapter 280 Zoning at time of construction since the exact date of construction is unknown. The consistency recommendation was made with consideration that no reconstruction of the pool is being proposed, the rate of shoreline erosion, the significant erosion controls constructed by the applicant to stabilize the shoreline from further erosion and the requirement that a swimming pool de-watering well be installed to further Policy 6: Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystem if approved. Figure 1. Subject parcel in 1972 shown with pool and distance to Block Island Sound. The proposed pool house is located in FEMA Flood Zone X and landward of the swimming pool. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Office Location: Town Annex /First Floor, Capital One Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 April 7, 2014 http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax (631) 765-9064 Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Southold, NY 11971 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. #6746 CARBONE, Dear Mark: Mailing Address: 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Jr. 1000-1-2-6.5 We have received an a plication or an "as built" in -ground swimming pool and construction of an access pool Vouse. A copy of the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval under Chapter 80 (Z ning Code), and survey map, project description form, are attached for your refere ce. Your written evaluation witecommendations for this proposal, as required under the Code procedures of LWRP gection 268-51) is requested within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman Chairperso By: Encls. FORM N0.3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: January 10, 2014 AMENDED: January 14, 2014 AMENDED: March 17, 2014 AMENDED: Auri12, 2014 TO: Ralph Carbone Jr. 635 Tudor Drive Cheshire, CT 06410 Please take notice that your application dated January 1, 2014 For permit for an as built in -ground swimming pool and to construct an accessory pool house at Location of property 6227 Castle Road, Fisher's Island, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 —Section 1 Block 2 Lot 6_5 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction on this nonconforming 2.5 acre parcel in the R-120 District is not permitted pursuant to Article IV, 280-15, which states, "In the Agricultural -Conservation District and Low -Density Residential R-80, R-120, R-200 and R-400 Districts, accessory buildings and structures or other accessory uses shall be located in the required rear yard." The proposed accessory pool house and the "as built" swimming pool are located in the side yard. Furthermore, the building department finds that the structure, as designed, constitutes a second dwelling unit. "In A -C, R-80, R-120, R-200 and R-400 Districts, no building or premises shall be used and no building or part of a building shall be erected or altered which is arranged, intended or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for M uses except the following: A. Permitted uses. (1) One -family detached dwellings, not to exceed one dwelling on each lot." In addition, the proposed pool house and "as built" swimming pool are not permitted pursuant to Article XXII Section 280-116 which states-, "All buildings located on lots adjacent to sounds and upon which there exists a bluff or bank landward of the shore or beach shall be set back not fewer than one hundred (100) feet from the top of such bluff or bank." The "as built" swimming pool is located +/- 18 feet from the top of the bluff and the proposed accesso1y pool house notes a setback of +/- 52 feet from the top of the bluff. Authorized Signature In January 14, 2014, this Notice of Disapproval was amended to include top of bluff setbacks and an "as built" in -ground swimming pool that exists on the property. It was further amended on March 17, 2014, to remove the need for a height variance. The Notice of Disapproval was amended again, on April 2, 2014, to adjust setback distances from the bluff based on an updated survey and to reflect the property's new tax map number. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. Cc: File, ZBA Fee: $ Filed By: Assignment No. APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS AREA VARIANCE House No. 6227 Street Castle Road Hamlet Fishers Island oc(,.ocy- SCTM 1000 Section 001 Block 02 Lots) 0o6•p05 Lot Size 3.63 Zone R-120 I (WE) APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED 04/02/2014 BASED ON SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED 03/28/2014 Applicants)/Owner(s): Ralph M. Carbone, Jr. and Lauryn F. Carbone Mailing Address: 635 c/o Matthews & Ham Telephone: 631/283-2400 Tudor Drive, Cheshire, Connecticut 06410 Fag: 631/287-1076 Email: Matthamesq@aol.com NOTE: In addition to the above. please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney, agent, architect, builder, contract vendee, etc. and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative: Stephen L. Ham, III for (x) Owner( )Other: Address: Matthews & Ham - 38 Nugent Street, Southampton, NY 11968 Telephone: 631/283-2400 Fag: 631/287-1076 Email: Matthamesq@aol.com Please check to specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to, from the above names: ( ) Applicant/Owner(s), (x) Authorized Representative, ( ) Other Name/ Address below: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED 03/28/2014 and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED -01/01/2014 FOR: (x) Building Permit O Certificate of Occupancy O Pre -Certificate of Occupancy ( ) Change of Use ( ) Permit for As -Built Construction ( ) Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article, Section, Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code.) Article: IV; XXII Section: 280-15; 280-116 Subsection: Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: (39 A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ( ) A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law- Section 280-A. ( ) Interpretation of the Town Code, Article Section ( ) Reversal or Other A prior appeal ()) has, ( ) has not been made at any time with respect to this property, UNDER Appeal No(s). 2479;6664 Year(s). 1978; 2013 . (Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our office for assistance) NameofOwner: Henry Luce, III ZBAFile# 2479 Ralph M. Ruroyn. e$Juartone 6664 REASONS FOR APPEAL (Please be specific, additional sheets may be used with preparer's signature notarized): 1. An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighbor or a detriment to nearby properties if granted, because: the swimming pool has existed in its current location for more than 35yyears; a pool house is a normal accessory structure and the proposed location would not have any significant visual impact on the adjoining property; there will be only -:a minimal increase in lot coverage, these owners having actually increased the size of their parcel by more than 17,000 square feet since the date of the last hearing in 2013; the owner's 3.63 -acre parcel, while merged for tax purposes,* actually constitutes two building sites. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: what little rear yard there is on this property is extremely close to the bluff and the side yard near the already existing swimming pool is the only feasible location. 3. The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: the swimming pool already exists in the proposed location; the owners have incurred considerable expense to rebuild the bluff over which the pool was actually hanging as a result of erosion caused by Hurricane Sandy; while the setback of the proposed pool house from the bluff could be considered substantial, it is still a considerable distance from the top of the bluff and significantly farther: --from it than the existing house and pool are. 4. The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: the only new construction is the pool house and it will be built in an area that is already disturbed; the bluff is being restored and adequate measures will be taken during construction to prevent runoff and instability of the bluff; overall environmental conditions at the site are being improved by the owners' actions in restoring the bluff. 5. Has the alleged difficulty been self created? { } Yes, or W No Why: the swimming pool was built by a prior owner in an improper location but the current owners had no knowledge of the illegality when they purchased the property and are now trying to rectify that problem; the current owners are seeking properpermits prior to construction of the pool house, not seeking retroactive approval for illegal Are there any Covenants or Restrictions concerning this land?} No} Yes (please furnish a copy) construction. The standard covenants and restrictions affecting the lots on the Map of shers IvIINIIUMDthea 1S mnt Cgr�grtio$nerall p s is a necessary an a e ua e, an a e same time reserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. Sworn to before me this day of April 20 f4 BARBARA T. HAM Notary Public, State of New York No 02HA5061959 Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Expires August 15, 20 tLf Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent (Agent must submit written Authorization from Owner) Stephen L. Ham, III, authorized agent *subsequent to the preparation of this application, applicant was advised that the two building sites now have separate tax map designations (SCTM Vs 1000-1-2-6.4 & 6.3 APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION APPLICANT: Ralph M. Carbone,Jr. & Lauryn F. Carbone DATE PREPARED: April 1, 2014 1. For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed: Not Applicable II. New Construction Areas (New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Dimensions of first floor extension: 24' x 36' plus 10' x 20' covered porch Dimensions of new second floor: 24' x 36' plus 10' x 20' open balcony Dimensions of floor above second level: Height (from finished ground to top of ridge): 22' Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed? If yes, please provide height (above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: NO III. Proposed Construction Description (Alterations or Structural Changes) NOT APPLICABLE (Attach extra sheet if necessary). Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage (from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: 8,375 s q . f t . Proposed increase of building coverage: 1.064 s q . f t . Square footage of your lot: 2 lots combined 158,123 +/— sq. ft. (buildable area — 96,268 ff Percentage of coverage of your lot by buildinarea: deed area coverage 5.3% current; 6.0% prof�sedt %uilda aarea coverage 6.17. current; 9.82. proposed V. Purpose of New Construction: addition of pool house for seasonal use as accessory structure to swimming pool VI. Please describe the land contours (flat, slope %, heavily wooded, marsh area, etc.) on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement (s): The developed area (house, pool, drive, garage, gardens and proposed pool house) is relatively flat with bluff and ocean to the south and 10% to 15% slopes to the north and east. Please submit 8 sets of photos, labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction, and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 4/2012 TOWN OF soerr MEP NEW YORK DATE).`�.E?,�L..r_A+.. 1978 ACTWX OF TM MO? ING 84AZU OF ArPfAL& Appeal No. 24.79 Dated September 22, 1978 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEAIS OF Tn TOWN OF SOUTHOL;D To Henry Luce, III Appellant Fishers island, New York 06390 (Eric Haas, Esq.) at s Meeting of the Zoaing Hoard of Appeals on October 19, 1978 the appeal was considered and the aetlon indicated below Mitac taken on Four ( } Request for va.rbxm due to Fact of seem to property { ) Request for a special exception, under the Uning Ordiaana (X) Request tar a variance to the Zoning Ordinance 1. SPECULL E)Et;KMON. lay resolution of the Board 't was determined that a special exception be granted ( ) be dented pursuant to Article --- Sectio= _._ Subsectiaos ...______..__ paragraph _.. of the Maim Ordinance and, the decision of the Building Inspector ( ) be reversed ( ) br coufir ed becawre 9z3O P.M.. (D.S.T.) Upon application of Henry Luce, III, Fishers Island, New York (Eric Haas, Esq.) for a variance in accor- dance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article 111, Seetion 100-34 C 2 for permission to construct a fence around an underground pool. Location of property: Fishers Island* New York, bounded on the north by Private Road; east by Simmons; south by Block Island Sound; west by Coffee. 2- VAMANCE. By resolution of the Board it was determined that (a) Strict applkatiat of the Ordinance (wMdd) (would act) produce practival difficulties or unnecessary hardship because SEE REVERSE (b) The hardship created. (is) (it not) unique and (would) (would mot) be she ed by all ptapeWm alike in the immediaie vicinity of this propetrty and in the name use dlstrlet because SEE REVYMSE (c) The variance, (does) (does not) observe the spirit at the Ordiname and (would) (would not) ebange the character of the district because SEE REVERSE std tbextfur% it was further determined that Lire requested variance { ) be granted ( ) be denied and that the previocu decrrslow of the Building Inspector ( ) be ove timed ( ) be reversed. SEE REVERSE ZO!r 00ABD OF APBEALS MRX ZS4 St1d t C' b 0 4 0, After investigation and inspection, the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to eliminate a swimming pool fence, Private Road, Fishers Island, New York, in a remote location at the easterly end of the Island. The findings of the Board are that the applicant owns a swimming pool (constructed prior to the fencing regulation) situated between an attractively landscaped home and Block Island Sound. Access is by meats of a private driveway off a private road several miles from the center of Fishers island. Large areas of a tract and nearby areas are covered with dense native under- brush, and the pool is partly protected from -casual intrusion by a steep bank to the south toward the beach. We agree that the remote location of the pool and its surroundings reduces the possibility of accidents involving casual intruders. A number of pools in the Town of Southold are located similarly to achieve privacy by means of some or all of the methods noted by the applicant. No one has ever been granted a fencing variance. A fence would not have prevented the only Southold Town fatality. (the man jumped into a partially filled pool.) it is the obligation of the Board of Appeals to require .all reasonable safety precautions. Accordingly, the Board finds that the hardship is not unique or unusual and that the aesthetic considerations noted by the applicant are outweighed, in our opinion, by the need to implement the safety, heAlth and welfare of the residents of the Town as set forth in the opening paragraphs of the Zoning Ordinance. This Board fizds that strict application of the Ordinance would not produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is not unique and would be sharers by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance will change the character of the neighborhood, and will not observe the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded, by lir. Tuthill, it was RESOLVED that Henry Luce, IIT, Fishers Island, New York be DENIED permission to eliminate a swimming pool fence. Location of property: Fie -hers island, New York, bounded on the north by Private Road; east by Simmons south by Block Island sound; west by Coffee. Vote of the Board: Ayest Messrs: Gillispie, Grigonis, Doyen, Tuthill and Douglass. RECEIVED AND FFIZED BY TEX SOU i 7:..Li TO IN CUM DATE, ri�l��7�' HOS'4 ln Town C9erk� Town of Southold BOARD MEMBERS SOF so Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Eric Dantes Jt Gerard P. Goehringer G Q George Homing p • �O Ken Schneider Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road • P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 OfficeLocation: Town Annex /First Floor, Capital One Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue). Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 • Fax (631) 765-9064 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF AUGUST 22, 2013 ZBA FILE: 6664 NAME OF APPLICANT: Ralph M. Carbone, Jr. SCTM 1000-1-2-5 PROPERTY LOCATION: East End Road, (aka Castle Road) (adj. to Block Island Sound) Fishers Island, NY SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated May 24, 2013 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county -wide or inter -community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated July 2, 2013. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action to maintain an existing third story enclosed captain's walk at a height of 39 feet is CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. It is our further recommendation that although the proposed action to locate renovations to an existing residential building at less than the Code required 100 feet setback from the top of the bluff, has been determined to be INCONSISTENT by the LWRP Coordinator with the LWRP policy standards, and therefore is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP, the extensive bluff restoration project plans undertaken by the Applicants do incorporate the comprehensive ideas and recommendations of all other appropriate Town and County agencies, including recommended techniques for the bluff restoration, the planting of native vegetation, and the idea of leaving unused portions of an existing foundation on site and intact as part of the bluff erosion protection plan, and therefore does significantly mitigate the coastal environment concerns as expressed by the LWRP Coordinator, enough that this Board recommends that the proposed renovation project to the existing building is CONSISTENT with the LWRP policy standards. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The Applicants' parcel is a 3.24 acre waterfront property in the R-120 Zone. The northerly lot line borders an adjacent 0.94 acre parcel also owned by the Applicants. The easterly lot line borders another parcel. The southerly lot line borders Block Island Sound, and the westerly lot line borders other residential property. The parcel is improved with a single family dwelling, with areas of decking, an Page 2 of 4 — August 22, 2013 ZBA#6664 — Carbone, Jr. SCTM#1000-1-2-5 attached garage, and an in ground swimming pool, as shown, with proposed renovations and additions, on the survey drawn by CME Associates Engineering, Land Surveying, & Architecture, PLLC, dated March 7, 2013, and last revised on May 07, 2013. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article XXII Code Section 280-116 and Article III Code Section 280-14 and the Building Inspector's April 16, 2013, amended May 13, 2013 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit for additions and alterations to a single family dwelling, at; 1) less than the code required 100 foot setback from top of bluff, 2) more than the code limit number of stories (2 '/2) with a height of more than the code limit of 35 feet. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests a variance to construct additions and alterations at+/- 13 feet setback from the top of the bluff where Code requires 100 feet, and another variance for a third story at a height of 39 feet, where Code only allows 2 '/2 stories at a height limit of 35 feet. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The Applicant's have secured the Board of Southold Town Trustees Wetland Permit #8043 dated Jan. 18, 2013, the Coastal Erosion Permit #8043C dated Feb. 20, 2013, authorizing extensive storm eroded bluff restoration, and the Wetland Permit #8215 dated June 19, 2013 authorizing the construction renovations on the Applicants' single family dwelling. The Applicants' have also secured a NYSDEC Tidal Wetlands Permit dated Feb. 27, 2013 authorizing the bluff restoration project. The Applicants' file contains other very relevant documentation including a memorandum from the Suffolk County Soil and Water Conservation District dated June 19, 2013 issued after a site visit by a County Soil District Technician. The memorandum includes several pertinent observations and recommendations for the Applicants' site regarding actions to safeguard the bluff during the bluff restoration and building renovation and construction, and a listing of preferred methods to be undertaken to stabilize the bluff, and specific actions under taken to attempt to prevent further future bluff erosion. The memorandum and related material submitted detail preferred bluff re -vegetation measures, provides a catalog of native plant selections, and further recommends that the portions of old building foundation facing the bluff, seaward of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line, that are not included in the renovated building footprint be left intact, and not be removed, in the effort to help stabilize the bluff. The file also contains a detailed work description titled "Carbone Slope Stabilization Project" dated Jan 10, 2013 as developed by the Ocean and Coastal Consultants Company. FINDINGS OF FACT/ REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held public hearings on this application on July 11, 2013 and August 8, 2013, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law 5267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The Applicants are reducing the seaward footprint of the existing building. Features such as a captain's walk were common and customary to residential buildings in past decades, and the 70 sq. ft. feature has existed on this building for many years. None of the Applicants' proposed renovations will create a change in the residential character of the neighborhood. 2. Town Law 5267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant for the proposed renovations cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance because a large portion of the existing building lies within 100 feet of the top of the bluff and therefore the renovations require the grant of a variance. The benefit sought by the applicant for the enclosed third story captain's walk at a 39 feet height cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance because Town Code allows only 2 '/2 stories at a maximum height of 3 5 feet. 3. Town Law 5267-b(3)(b)(3). The variance granted herein for a 13 feet setback from the top of the bluff is mathematically substantial, representing 87% relief from the code. However, the Applicants are actually reducing Page 3 of 4 — August 22, 2013 ZBA#6664 — Carbone, Jr. SCTM#1000-1-2-5 the seaward footprint of the existing building, and are applying substantial financial resources to bluff restoration necessary because of storm related erosion. The variance granted herein for a third floor space is mathematically substantial representing 100% relief from the code. However, the space was built years ago by previous owners, its removal would require expensive roof re -construction, the 70 sq. ft. area is quite small in relation to the overall size of the entire house, and this area will remain non -habitable. 4. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The Applicants have incorporated the extensive input of the Southold Town and Suffolk County agencies responsible for safeguarding the coastal environment into their bluff restoration and building renovation projects. The Applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code and all other applicable building Codes. 5. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. 6. Town Law 4267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a building renovations and use of an existing enclosed captain's walk, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-13, motion was offered by Member Horning, seconded by Member Weisman (Chairperson), and duly carried, to GRANT, the variances as applied for, and shown on the survey drawn by CME Associates Engineering, Land Surveying, & Architecture, PLLC, dated March 7, 2013, and last revised on May 07, 2013, and the architectural drawings by Catalano Architects, Inc. dated 5/13/13, pages AO.1,A D.1,A1.0 — A1.5, subject to the following conditions; CONDITIONS: 1. The existing enclosed third story captain's walk will remain as non -habitable, non -conditioned space to be used only as an observation tower. 2. The third story space will not be enlarged, and will not be outfitted with beds, tap water, or any type of kitchen appliances. 3. The third story space, and the access to and from it will comply with all applicable State, and Town Fire Codes. 4. The Applicants shall obtain a valid CO for the existing swimming pool within one year of the date of this decision. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variances) granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Page 4 of 4 —August 22, 2013 ZBA#6664 — Carbone, Jr. SCTM#1000-1-2-5 Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Weisman (Chairperson), Goehringer, Schneider, Dantes, Horning This Resolution was duly adopted (5-0). lie• 02 i, — Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing /2013 April 15, 2005 FISHERS ISLAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Restrictive Covenants Relating, to Development and Annual Assessment Set forth below are the operative provisions of the restrictive covenants imposed by FIDCO and its predecessors, Fishers Island Corporation and Fishers Island Estates, Inc. (referred to therein as "grantor, its successors or assigns") in the deeds to all lands in the Olmsted "Park" east of the gate on Fishers Island, relating to the construction of improvements on and landscaping of such lands and the payment of annual maintenance charges, as such covenants were modified and renewed for a term of 20 years from April 15, 2005. These covenants "run with the land" and are binding on all such lands and on the owners thereof and their transferees and assignees (referred to therein as "grantee, his heirs, successors or assigns"). With the consent of the specified majority in acreage of the owners of lands in the "Park", these covenants may be further modified and fiuther renewed for successive terms of 20 years. "That the aforesaid premises shall be occupied and used by the grantee, [his/her] heirs and assigns, for private residential purposes only, and not otherwise, and there shall be erected thereon only a private residence for the use of one family only, together with the necessary outbuildings appurtenant thereto, PROVIDED that if more than one homesite is hereby conveyed, only one such residence shall be erected or maintained on each of such homesites, which are hereinbefore respectively designated as Homesites Nos. "That no building or other structure shall be erected on the aforesaid premises, no alterations shall be made in the exterior of any building or other structure erected thereon, and nothing else shall be done materially affecting the appearance of the aforesaid premises except according to plans (including exterior color scheme, grading plan, planting plan and location plan) which shall have been approved in writing by the grantor, its successors or assigns. "That no stable for live stock shall be erected or maintained on the aforesaid premises by the grantee, his heirs or assigns, and no live stock shall be kept on any part of the property hereby conveyed, without the written consent of the grantor, its successors or assigns. "That the premises herein conveyed shall be kept free from any nuisance, and from any object or condition otherwise offensive to the neighborhood, or dangerous to the health of trees or other vegetation in said neighborhood. "That from and after April 15, 2005, the grantee, his heirs, successors and assigns, by the acceptance of this deed, covenants and agrees to pay to the grantor, its successors or assigns: (a) an annual basic maintenance charge, as fixed by the grantor, its successors or assigns, which charge, except with the consent of the owners of a majority in acreage of all land within the "Park," shall not exceed in any one year $100 per acre, said charge to be applied to the maintenance, repair and improvement of roads, sidewalks, sewers and gutters, and to the collection and disposal of garbage and other refuse; and (b) an annual supplemental maintenance charge, as fixed by the grantor, its successors or assigns, which charge, except with the consent of the owners of a majority in acreage of all land within the "Park", shall not exceed in any one year $2,000 per parcel, said charge to be applied to the maintenance, repair and improvement of roads, sidewalks, sewers and gutters, and to the establishment and maintenance of suitable reserves therefor, and to the collection and disposal of garbage and other refuse. "In establishing from time to time the amount of said annual supplemental maintenance charge, different charges may be made applicable to improved and unimproved parcels. In no event shall the grantee, his heirs, successors or assigns, be obligated to pay in any one year a supplemental maintenance charge with respect to more than one parcel owned by the grantee in the "Park", provided, however, if any parcel owned by the grantee, his heirs, successors or assigns is an improved parcel, the supplemental charge payable shall be in the amount then established for improved parcels. Solely for purposes of the preceding sentence the term "grantee" shall include the grantee and such of his spouse and minor children that were resident in his primary household for 180 or more days during the year in question. "Said basic and supplemental maintenance charges shall be payable annually with full payment due within fifteen (15) days of receipt of a written statement therefor. Unpaid maintenance charges are hereby made liens on the premises. Nothing herein contained shall obligate the grantor, its successors or assigns to maintain, repair or improve any roads, sidewalks, sewers (except such main trunk line sewers as may exist from time to time) or gutters or to collect or dispose of any garbage or other refuse. In no event shall the grantor, its successors or assigns be liable to the grantee, his heirs, successors or assigns for any failure of performance hereunder unless such failure is attributable to the negligence of the grantor, or its successors or assigns, in which event any such liability shall be limited to the amount collected pursuant to this paragraph." s QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? Yes X No B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? X No Yes please explain on attached sheet. C. 1.) Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? no 2.) Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application? n/a 3.) Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area, and the upland building area? no 4.) If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? no Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees: inquiry will be made prior to hearing and if issued, please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? no E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting? no Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above line. F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? yes If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe: Permit 438001 for interior renovations was ainended follow* ngg decision in #6f64 to over exterior work approved in G teat decson. Copies o file with Buiding Department Please attac a 1 pre-cert1 cates o occupancy and cert1 icate o o cupancy or the subject premises. If any are lacking, please apply to the Building Department to either obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel? yes If yes, please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. shown on key map to site plan (FIDCO''Lot I'AA; SCTM# 1000-1-2-3) I. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel single—family residnece with swimming pool and the proposed use same with added pool house (ex: existing single family, proposed: same with garage, pool or other) syf�w % • - - 04/01/2014 Authorized signature and Date Stephen L. Ham, III, authorized agent L' J FORM NO, t TOVW OF saUTH41D ESM DEPARTmLNT Town Cle+rWx € ee South01d, N. Y. ; Certificate Of Occupancy No. Z. 3M32, , ... Date .......... Oct... r31 ....... , 19.69. THIS CERTI MS that the building located at 8-/8, PIrt -PA-l- 1/end -?,,T * Street p No. F•.l. a ....Block No, hTa. �..�, ...Y -sheen -I stand... S,T* conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this ofrice dated _ ..... ,. -,Sept _ . , .� ..., 106$ . pursuant to which Building Permit Km .fib .Z. dated ......... - 3e.pt . , 10 . , . , 19 i6g . , was issuers, and conforms to all of the require- ments of the applicable previsions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is Issued is ...pr'ivate. •one_ •family•dV6j-IiRg........................ . ......... . The certificate is issuers to > .. slenry, .it: --Lade- ITT. of the aforesaid. building. (owuevvee or ~ten=t) Suffolk County Department of health Approval . �� r�.,........................... . Building;spar . 617.20 Appendix B Short Environmental Assessment Form Instructions for Comnletine Part 1 - Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 - Project and Sponsor Information Construction of Pool House — Ralph M. Carbone, Jr. & Lauryn F. Carbone Name of Action or Project: Construction of Pool House at Carbone Fishers Island Residence Project Location (describe, and attach a location map): 6227 Castle Road, Fishers Island, Town df Southold SCTM # 1000-001.00-02.00-006.00! Brief Description of Proposed Action: Construction of New Pool House consisting of two _stories with first floor of 24' x 36' and 10' x 20' covered porch and second floor of 24' x 36' and 10' x 20' open balcony Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Ralph M. Carbone, Jr. & Lauryn F. Carbone Telephone: 631/283-2400 E -Mail: Matthamesq@aol.com Address: 635 Tudor Drive City/PO: Cheshire State: CT Zip Code: 06410 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, administrative rule, or regulation? NO YES If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that X may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval: NO YES Town of Southold Building Department Building Permit X 3.a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 3.63 acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 0.02 acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 3.63 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on, adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑ Urban on Rural (non -agriculture) ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential (suburban) ❑ Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic ❑ Other (specify): ❑ Parkland Pagel of 4 5. Is the proposed action, a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? NO YES N/A X X 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? NO YES 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes, identify: located on Fishers Island NO YES X 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? b. Are public transportation service(s) available at or near the site of the proposed action? c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? NO YES X X X 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: NO YES X 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? If No, describe method for providing potable water: NO YES X 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: private on site septic NO YES X 12. a. Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic Places? b. Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? NO YES X X 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency? b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: NO YES X X 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: ® Shoreline ❑ Forest ❑ Agricultural/grasslands ❑ Early mid -successional ❑ Wetland ❑ Urban ❑ Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? NO YES X 16. Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? (not in developable area) NO YES X 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non -point sources? If Yes, a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ® NO ❑ YES b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)? If Yes, briefly describe: ❑ NO ® YES on site drywells NO YES X Page 2 of 4 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of water or other liquids (e.g. retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)? If Yes, explain purpose and size: NO YES X small to large impact impact may 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste management facility? If Yes, describe: NO YES X 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 20. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: NO YES X establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Carbone Applicant/sponsorname: Ralph M. Carbone, Jr. & Lauryn F. / Date: April 1, 2014 Signature: By L. Pb--,Zr Stephen L. Ham, III, authorized agent Part 2 - Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept "Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" Page 3 of 4 No, or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit, biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a. public / private water supplies? b. public / private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic, archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources (e.g., wetlands, waterbodies, groundwater, air quality, flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 Part 3 - Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency deterniined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and cumulative impacts. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Date Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 No, or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion, flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3 - Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency deterniined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and cumulative impacts. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Date Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 1000 - 001.00 -02.00 - 006.004 & 006.005 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board 0 Planning Dept. 1E Building Dept. © Board of Trustees 0 Board of Appeals X 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital E construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: construction of accessory structure (pool house) 2. Location of action: 6227 Castle Road, Fishers Island Site acreage: 3.63 acres Present land use: single-family residential Present zoning classification: R-120 If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Ralph M. Carbone, Jr. & Lauryn F. Carbone (b) Mailing address: 635 Tudor Drive, Cheshire, Connecticut 06410 c/o Matthews & Ham (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( ) (631) 283-2400 (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No ❑X If yes, which state or federal agency? DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ❑x Yes ❑ No [—I Not Applicable While the project is a private development and does not have a public purpose, it does make beneficial use of a coastal location. Although the new structure will be within 100 feet of the top of the bluff, that bluff is currently undergoing a major restoration and the new structure will have no impact on the stability of the bluff. Moreover, an existing swimming pool, that.had been the subject of severe erosion, will be stabilized and located a reasonable distnace from the top of the bluff. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No Fx] Not Applicable The project is neither designed nor intended to have an impact on historic or archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes R No ® Not Applicable The project is not designed nor is it intended to have any impact on visual quality or the protection of scenic resources. Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria Yes D No® Not Applicable The project is not designed nor is it intended to have an impact on flooding or erosion but the concurrent restoration of the bluff will have a beneficial effect on erosion. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes D No ® Not Applicable The proiect is not designed nor is it intended to have any impact on water quality. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes R No© Not Applicable The project is not designed nor is it intended to have any impact on the quality or functions of Town of Southold ecosystems. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No® Not Applicable The project is not designed nor is it intended to have any impact on air quality. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No © Not Applicable The project is not designed nor is it intended to have an impact on environmental degradation from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes except that appropriate measures will be taken during construction to insure that any wastes or substances resulting from construction activities will be confined to the site. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ YeO No © Not Applicable The project is a private development and provision of public access is irrelevant. Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water -dependent uses and promote siting of new water -dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable The protection of water -dependent uses and promotion of their siting in suitable locations are not relevant to this proiect. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable The project is neither designed nor intended to promote sustanable use of living marine resources. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable The project is neither designed nor intended to protect agricultural lands. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. © Yes ❑ No® Not Applicable Promotion of appropriate use and development of mineral resources is irrelevant to this project. PREPARED BY: Stephen L. Ham, III, authorized agent April 1, 2014 Created on 512510511:20 AM AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 11191Il/Ee1a VY91"Tel i� 1 WHEN TO USE THIS FORM: This form must be completed by the applicant for any special use permit, site plan approval, use variance, area variance or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district OR within 500 feet of a farm operation located in an agricultural district All applications requiring an agricultural data statement must be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance with Section 239m and 239n of the General Municipal Law. 1. Name of Applicant: Ralph M. Carbone, Jr. & Laur n F. Carbone 2. Address of Applicant: 635 Tudor Drive, Cheshire, CT 06410 3. Name of Land Owner (if other than Applicant): same 4. Address of Land Owner: same 5. Description of Proposed Project: construction of accessory structure (pool house) 6. Location of Property: (road and Tax map number) 6227 Castle Road, Fishers Island, Town of Southold (SCTM # 1000-1-2- 7. Is the parcel within 500 feet of a farm operation? { } Yes {x} No 6.4 & 6.5) 8. Is this parcel actively farmed? { } Yes {x} No 9. Name and addresses of any owner(s) of land within the agricultural district containing active farm operations. Suffolk County Tax Lot numbers will be provided to you by the Zoning Board Staff, it is your responsibility to obtain the current names and mailing addresses from the Town Assessor's Office (765-1937) or from the Real Property Tax Office located in Riverhead. NAME and ADDRESS 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (Please use the back of this page if there are additional property owners) �J4I,-- L- -N— 04 / 01 / 2014 Signature of Applicant Date Stephen L. Ham, III, authorized agent Note: 1. The local Board will solicit comments from the owners of land identified above in order to consider the effect of the proposed action on their farm operation. Solicitations will be made by supplying a copy of this statement. 2. Comments returned to the local Board will be taken into consideration as part as the overall review of this application. 3. Copies of the completed Agricultural Data Statement shall be sent by applicant to the property owners identified above. The cost for mailing shall be paid by the Applicant at the time the application is submitted for review. f�Y 1 £ 't. - � - y. .; :_ - _ - r=e4 "-tom _ .:.'f'�r: n..,?.v�•,' - SIRE a T - l : - RE.::f NEI�j� N f.ft.jo , -J ~..• _ .: =` ' S4S. VL LFARM COfWIM. YCB. M15C. Mltt: Valegia- s' ND IMP. TOTAL DAfE REMARKS !- /. ( ::..- W Sr Y cP, C 52 Ls o b d 06 cla ZU w44 u7_—L12-071 - ��.-_•���--� - -� 2,' � � 12. S jo%l 3 -� ��.� � :� a�.�,�s •t:mak-�:: �.�:��s,,: `<'•:;�' \Eaiue Per aliie.' _ :. 'Ia .h `Tulllytt h 5warnpland FRONTAGE ON WATER Brushland FRONTAGE ON ROAD' - House Not DEPTH -• *—k7- x' BULKHEAD : Total DOCK 4Wb ANO -1d1O1 _Foundation Bath •;' :� L- l Dinette = ens3os, a0s�' =lid:. osement Floors* K. .e ' t• WQlls Interior Finish LR. �T $� G.tS1` G }*4CZ ire Place Heat A/u1 DR. : : lT� 4 00 Type Roof Rooms 1st Floor BR.recreation Roo Rooms 2nd Floor T FIN. a. Dormer `! Qrivewoy QJf' - �_ �. :Err-• - - . - - __ _.. RZ- - �;i: - - - - ;gyp-:F..a• .:�{f _-,c.', - 3 !F' - ' - - la •r _ - -1d1O1 COLOR ` i E r TRIM 1 st 2nd M. Bldg. Foundationcz OTHER Bath Dinette Extension Basement FULL cou8o sWs� P,�rFnL Floors Kit. Extension Finished B. interior Finish L.R. Extension Fire Place Heat D.R. Garage Ext. Walls BR, Porch Dormer Baths XX DecfdPatio Fam. Rm. Pool Foyer XC. Laundry Library/ Study COLOR "RIM 1st 2rd M. Bldg. � � - • � Finis Vol" Fire Place Ext, Walls Hath -�Dsk o Dinette Extension Floors S- }Cit. Extension interior Finish L.R. Extension Heat D.R. (Garage 13R. Porch Dormer Baths DecklPatio Fam. Rm. t✓ Pool Foyer A.C. Laundry O.B. Library/ Study Dock I I, n,aIra, .ft U. d. Dock �Q0p _ 1-Z- t,,3 m TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD k, > OWNER STREET VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT -oz ACA. RE AA K ' ` L �O(SP 1 J i. l 2:7,52:7,5i . -2-`t � +Wtt -'b �f 4-ld TYPE OF BLD. PROP. CLASS LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE Soo ac�-p �() 12,:d) I I I I FRONTAGE ON WATER I I I HOUSE/LOT I BULKHEAD TOTAL Ralph M. Carbone, Jr. Lauryn F. Carbone 635 Tudor Drive Cheshire, CT 06410 Board of Appeals Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 March 31, 2014 Re: Application for Variances at Premises at Fishers Island (S.C.T.M. No. 1000-001.00-02.00-005.00 Dear Board Members: The undersigned, co-owners of premises situate at Fishers Island, New York (SCTM # 1000-001.00-02.00-006.006), hereby authorize Stephen L. Ham, III of Matthews & Ham, 38 Nugent Street, Southampton, New York 11968, to act as their agent in making such applications to your Board and in taking any and all incidental actions in regard thereto, including without limitation, completing and executing the required forms, giving any required notices and appearing at any public hearings, as he shall deem necessary or advisable in order to obtain approval of any required variances that would permit the construction that is the subject of a Notice of Disapproval from the Southold Building Department relating to the referenced premises, dated January 10, 2014, amended January 14, 2014 and March 17, 2014, as the same may be subsequently amended. Very truly yours, . Carbone, Jr. � r�jw -) ury F. Carbone APPLICANT/OWNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME : RALPH M. CARBONE, JR. (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance X Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Nlooring Other (activity) Planning Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO X If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicant/a(yent/representative) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply) : A) the owner of greater that 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation) B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non -corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation) C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or D) the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submittedthis day of March , 2014 Signature PritttNatne Ralph M. Carbone, Jr. APPLICANT/OWNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southoid's Code of Ethics Prohibits conflicts of interest on the Part of town officers and employees The Purt>ose of this form is to Provide information which can alert the town of Possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take a hatev er action is necessary to avoid same YOUR NAME : LAURYN F. CARBONE (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance X Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other (activity) Planning Do you personally (or through your company, sponse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO X If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Naive of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicant/agent/representative) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply) : A) the owner of greater that 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation) B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non -corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation) C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or D) the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted thisl day of March Zp 1 SignatureL Print Name Lauryn F. Carbone AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and emplovees. The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOURNAME: Ralph M. Carbone, Jr. & Lauryn F. Carbone (Stephen L. Ham, III, agent) (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Variance X Change of Zone Approval of Plat Other (activity) Building Permit Trustee Permit Coastal Erosion Mooring Planning Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO X If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicant/agent/representative) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply) : A) the owner of greater that 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation) B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non -corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation) C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or D) the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this I j day of April , 2014 Signature _4ilh" �— L- 4 Print Name Stephen L. Ham, III, agent rl roll Ow rw elo-- go r- il Pil V • ALAMff—�-7 40 A lk -dor 4w *sib. FIRM. 67� �C, D- ka, o s NOTICE, 00UNTY OF SUFFOLK © K rowTM ry of SpppLp SECTION NO MMNTENANCEALTERATION,SALEOR '00 �,gN Real Property Tax Service Agency E r 001 Vvwn NLLAGE OF 1Nr ' 015TRIBUTpN OF ANY PORTION OF THE suFFou<wun. rAx MAP rs PRa1IRITED 1MTHOUT KftITTEN PERMISSION OF THE u%f S` oN �y cR1r C.n»T wY.rhe.a, NY 11901 `p scALE wrEEr • � 108 8 SUO 188 M A 005 e1 EVYUEB pSTRICT NO 1000 PROPERTY MAP rc 80 REAL PRO PER. rAx SERVICE ac 1. - j1'yytiL P ooa 130 OON 1 SIGN DATE u N. m11 O BURIED PROPANE TAN$ �\ o 44 \ PAVED (p0 �►` v` EDGE OF 6" TREE DRIVEWAY CJ ` LAWN H N 2223.04 z� \ 'yr xry'� �,''(ry W E 2Dt8ME 6" TREE � \ — - — O \ OIL FILL G� & VENT PIPES - �a, 1 �� ALL OIL TANKS O S810G'� 2O 0 AND PIPES TO BE REN D • CHERRY J _ e OR ABANDONED. 2' • x,18 • 1 /� OIL FILL LANDBSSp PE IRON ' &VENT PIPE �, TOP & BOTTOM :CH PIN a 1954... 6" TREE &HRUB \O Le KR F' 10' TREE -- ry aMONUMEN ZN S" CHERRY a�';'\" BURI FOUNTAIN j. - lil LAWN 10" TREE CIN N . STONE ie`J� C� STEPS E SOQO / / II S" CHERRY J BAYER �� 0 0 ,�� SHRUB -A Q _ PINE GARDENbob_CDp - O �. •ls" TOP OF �O P PINE C WALL=16.2± O PROPOSE c B PINE 8" PINE OOL HOI� ` X 9.4 C� WOOD STAIRS 8 e PIN W/ RAILINGS• LAWN , GARDE PCD ''41 Nix, CP IONO cgs < — PINE lr p2 SNE- - •s .2) �.�, ��!"�1,1� �`� 6 POOL o {INET ; TOP OF 8 -PINE i ' (FOUND 6 CONCRETE rn U gNT '02 / C> # W 10 7 4 , S I/ o O -PINS - _ I> P1r2iE I rn , H _ o O ' • i-3 --_ BLOCK 1 I n I WALL -15.9- / Carbone Residence Road- )[ 9.7 //Fishers)Isand,NY / / / / Site Plan SCALE: ,• =10' DATE: 3/26/14 X 9.7 CONCRETE / TOP OF SEA WALL WALL -15.3 _ BOULDERS SHORE LINE ORIGINAL DEED i' SHORE LINE - 1982 Catalano Architects Inc. 115 Broad Street Boston, Massachusetts 02110 telephone 617-3387447 facsimile 617-338-6639 C 0.1 � rn I> rn o WALL -15.9- / Carbone Residence Road- )[ 9.7 //Fishers)Isand,NY / / / / Site Plan SCALE: ,• =10' DATE: 3/26/14 X 9.7 CONCRETE / TOP OF SEA WALL WALL -15.3 _ BOULDERS SHORE LINE ORIGINAL DEED i' SHORE LINE - 1982 Catalano Architects Inc. 115 Broad Street Boston, Massachusetts 02110 telephone 617-3387447 facsimile 617-338-6639 C 0.1 �,��econd Floor First Floor Plan MECHANICAL ROOM STORAGE ss. 7-r East Elevation facing house 4 �7` (:�)���ievation Elevation (facing Street) r2cm Carbone Residence Castle Road Fishers Island,NY Pool House SCALE: 1/4' = V-0' DATE: 3/26/14 Catalano Architects Inc. 115Broad Street Boston, Ma—humus 02110 I,le,hone 617-33B-7447 facsimile _ ,mle 617 338-6639 ❑ PH 1.1 PATH GREAT ROOM WET BAR 1U, .Ir ILI COVERED PATIO First Floor Plan MECHANICAL ROOM STORAGE ss. 7-r East Elevation facing house 4 �7` (:�)���ievation Elevation (facing Street) r2cm Carbone Residence Castle Road Fishers Island,NY Pool House SCALE: 1/4' = V-0' DATE: 3/26/14 Catalano Architects Inc. 115Broad Street Boston, Ma—humus 02110 I,le,hone 617-33B-7447 facsimile _ ,mle 617 338-6639 ❑ PH 1.1 N/F ROBINSON & JEAN BAKER (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE) MUNICIPAL WATER AND ON SITE SEPTIC COASTAL EROSION HAZARD UNE (SEE MAP REFERENCE No.2) BOTTOMI OF BANK AFTER SLOPE STABILIZATION LIMITS OF_/ FLOOD ZONE VE I�r 6?.rs 3S. �Y CONTROL CERTIFICATION _QUALITY GROUP REVIEWED DA E PROJECT MANAGER SURVEY �« ENVIRONMENTAL 4' CIVIL` TREE LINE t� STRUCTURAL MAX : • ■ ■ ARCHITECTURAL UTILITY POLE STONE GATE HOUSE N/F WILLIAM L. HANLEY JR. (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE) MUNICIPAL WATER AND ON SITE SEPTIC TOP OF BANK 11-2012 AND TOP OF BANK AFTER SLOPE STABILIZATION ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ . . ■ ■ . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ . ■ ■ ■ ■ NOTES 1.) THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED FOR THE PARTIES AND PURPOSE INDICATED STONE WALL HEREON. ANY EXTENSION OF THE USE BEYOND THE PURPOSED AGREED TO ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ BETWEEN THE CLIENT AND THE SURVEYOR EXCEEDS THE SCOPE OF THE 4' ENGAGEMENT. TREE LINE . MAX 4 MAX : • ■ ■ LINE PIT WITH 10 MIL PLASTIC SHEETING, KEY ENDS INTO GRADE BOTTOM OF BANK AFTER SLOPE STABILIZATION STONE REVETMENT UNDER CONSTRUCTION / BOTTOM OF BANK PERMIT #1-4738-04184/00001 11-2012 SEE APPROVED PLANS BY OCF�Y COASTAL CONSULTANTS / IDATED 01/18/2013 / BOTTOM :OF BANK / / 6-2012 TOP OF OF BANK 6-2012, I � � J 'SHORELINE BY DEED PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS UNE OF SILT FENCE AND MAINTAIN THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION (TYP. SEE DEVIL) DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS (POOL HOUSE) ROOF AREA = 1000 SF REQUIRED = 1000 SF X 1.0 X 2/12 = 167 CF 167 CF / 28.27 CF/VF = 5.9 VF USE ONE(1) - 6'0 X 6' DEEP DRY WELL. 4• SDR 35 PVC SLOPE AS REQUIRED 1' STONE OR SCREENED GRAVEL STORMWATER DRYWELL DETAIL NOT TO SCALE MIN. 6' SOIL COVER OVER DRYWELL BLOCKS AND CATCH BASIN GRATE TO GRADE f (NEENAH R -2525-F) OR EQUAL PLAN 4' -►{ i J1 3' 75 -4, SECTION :TE WASHt NOT TO SCALE NOTES: 1. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE FOR TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION, LARGER PROJECTS OR PROJECTS REQUIRING PUMPS MUST BE SIZED ACCORDINGLY (7 GALLONS/TRUCK, 50 GALLONS/PUMP, PLUS MIN: 1' FREEBOARD). 2. CAPTURE MATERIAL AND LIQUIDS MUST BE REMOVED FROM PIT AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF WHEN THE PIT REACHES 75% OF ITS CAPACITY. 3. INSPECT PIT PRIOR TO EACH USE TO ENSURE CONTAINMENT OF WASH WATER. SILT FENCE WOVEN WIRE FENCE (MIN. 14 PERSPECTIVE VIEW WOVEN WIRE FENCE (MIN. 14 1/2 GAUGE W/ MAX. 6" MESH SPACING) WITH FILTER CLOTH 36" MIN. FENCE POST UNDISTURBED GROUND '/�/i COMPACTED SOIL \\\ EMBED FILTER CLOTH A MIN. OF 6" IN GROUND "4- SECTION VIEW CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 1 -AA 1-2A 1-1A 1-3A .SITE 1-3c 1-1C 1-2t MON!'Y POND (HOUGHTON) 1-" v� 1-4A 0�0 v0 1-4t 2-5 1-5 2-4 LOCATION MAP PROVIDE STRAW BALES BACKED WITH SILT FENCE (TYP) SCALE 1 "=400' Wo RECEIVED APR 0 3 2014 BOARD OF APPEALS MAP REFERENCES 1.) SURVEY OF PROPERTY OF HENRY LUCE III FISHERS ISLAND, NEW YORK SCALE: 1"=50 FT. CHANDLER do PALMER, ENGR'S. NORWICH, CONN. REVISIONS do OCT. 1969 ADDITIONS 12/6/82 2.) COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREA MAP, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK, SCALE 1"=200' SHEET 42 -FI OF 49 PHOTO NO.38-879-83 DATED 08/29/88 PREPARED BY THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION. 1. WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO FENCE POSTS WITH WIRE TIES OR STAPLES, POSTS SHALL BE STEEL EITHER "T" OR "U" TYPE OR HARDWOOD. 2. FILTER CLOTH TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WIRE FENCE WITH TIES SPACED EVERY 24" AT TOP AND MID SECTION, FENCE SHALL BE WOVEN WIRE, 6" MAXIMUM MESH OPENING. 3. WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER THEY SHALL BE OVER -LAPPED BY SIX INCHES AND FOLDED, FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE EITHER FILTER X, MIRAFI 100X, STABILNKA T140N, OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. 4. PREFABRICATED UNITS SHALL BE GEOFAB, ENVIROFENCE, OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. 5. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED AND MATERIAL REMOVED WHEN "BULGES" DEVELOP IN THE SILT FENCE. LEGEND PROPERTY LINE ABUTTERS LINE EDGE OF PAVEMENT EXISTING CONTOUR NOTES 1.) THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED FOR THE PARTIES AND PURPOSE INDICATED STONE WALL HEREON. ANY EXTENSION OF THE USE BEYOND THE PURPOSED AGREED TO RETAINING WALL BETWEEN THE CLIENT AND THE SURVEYOR EXCEEDS THE SCOPE OF THE FENCE ENGAGEMENT. TREE LINE 2.) IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE STATE EDUCATION LAW EOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS PROPOSED CONTOUR ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, TO ALTER AN SILT FENCE ITEM IN ANY WAY. UTILITY POLE 3.) ONLY COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MARKED WITH THE LAND SURVEYOR'S BOUNDARY POINT SIGNATURE AND AN ORIGINAL EMBOSSED OR INK SEAL ARE THE PRODUCT OF THE WATER VALVE LAND SURVEYOR. L- j 4.) COORDINATE DISTANCES ARE MEASURED FROM U.S. COAST AND GEODETIC 0_ >O SURVEY TRIANGULATION STATION "EAST END 2" 36" MIN. LENGTH FENCE 'OSTS 5.) SITE IS IN THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK TAX MAP 1000, DRIVEN MIN. 16" NTO GROUND SECTION 001, BLOCK 2, LOTS 6.4 do 6.5. Lj 6.) SITE IS LOCATED IN R-120 ZONE. J 7.) BASE FOR LEVELS: NGVD 1929. m 8.) PORTIONS OF THIS SITE LIE WITHIN FLOOD ZONES VE AS SHOWN ON FIRM, c FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK COMMUNITY: TOWN OF I LLJ SOUTHOLD NUMBER: 360813 PANEL 41 OF 1026 MAP SUFFIX: H MAP NUMBER HEIGHT OF 36103CO041 H MAP REVISED SEPTEMBER 25, 2009. FILTER = 16" MIN. N �j 9.) APPLICANT: RALPH CARBONE, JR. U 635 TUDOR DRIVE EMBED FILTER CHESHIRE, CT CLOTH A MIN. OF C 6" IN GROUND 10.) SITE IS SERVICED BY MUNICIPAL WATER AND ON SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL cn W SYSTEM. c./) 11. HOUSE ROOF DRAINS ARE CURRENTLY CONNECTED TO UNDERGROUND Oo RETENTION SYSTEM(S). u) 12.) TOTAL AREA OF 1A & 1C = 3.63± ACRES (2.21± ACRES BUILDABLE) Z PERCENT OF LOT COVERAGE -EXISTING- 8.7%- PROPOSED- 9.9% J 13.) SLOPE STABILIZATION PERMITS: Li NYSDEC #1-4738-04184/00001 Y O SOUTHOLD TRUSTEES APPROVED 02-20-2013 12� 14.) SITE DISTURBANCE FOR POOL HOUSE CONSTRUCTION- 6300± SQ. FT. 0 O 15.) SOIL TYPE FROM SOIL SURVEY OF SUFFOLK COUNTY NEW YORK- USDA SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE- RpE- RIVERHEAD AND PLYMOUTH VERY BOULDERY SOILS m 15-35% SLOPES 1. WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO FENCE POSTS WITH WIRE TIES OR STAPLES, POSTS SHALL BE STEEL EITHER "T" OR "U" TYPE OR HARDWOOD. 2. FILTER CLOTH TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WIRE FENCE WITH TIES SPACED EVERY 24" AT TOP AND MID SECTION, FENCE SHALL BE WOVEN WIRE, 6" MAXIMUM MESH OPENING. 3. WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER THEY SHALL BE OVER -LAPPED BY SIX INCHES AND FOLDED, FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE EITHER FILTER X, MIRAFI 100X, STABILNKA T140N, OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. 4. PREFABRICATED UNITS SHALL BE GEOFAB, ENVIROFENCE, OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. 5. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED AND MATERIAL REMOVED WHEN "BULGES" DEVELOP IN THE SILT FENCE. LEGEND PROPERTY LINE ABUTTERS LINE EDGE OF PAVEMENT EXISTING CONTOUR 36 - - - STONE WALL � RETAINING WALL LLJ FENCE v v v TREE LINE 0 PROPOSED CONTOUR 44 SILT FENCE UTILITY POLE -0 BOUNDARY POINT O WATER VALVE D4 L- j v~) U 30' 15' 0 30' GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET r� E N 0 N U M � C N c� c c co m � c L E (L U 00 O_ O O co I- N U o .a H U @ ,z 0 = 0 cu 00 W �oc co J > czcz w U N M M M m Q 0 0 z � LLJ W • 0 cn Ld -� Y O Z L- j v~) U 0_ >O _ zCN D_ L z O r NzLd Lj _1 O J o m `I c O I LLJ Q p co N 00 00 N cc N �j U i - N Ld_ C Im cn W LI.J (� c./) 0 CN Oo Q u) Q Z o w Y J I Li I Y O O W 12� w 2 0 O W 0- m cnO 1 0 U U L� DATE: MARCH 28, 2014 J PROJECT #2012828 m Q 0 0 z SHEET 1 OF 1 W Q 0 0 F- 0 o Q o 0 J a (n o 00 N 0D_ N co N 00 00 N cc N N Ocn N N M o Im o N 0 CN Oo U z 0 z Z o w Y J L� D 0' Y O O W 12� w 2 0 O W 0- m O 1 0 U U L� DATE: MARCH 28, 2014 SCALE: 1 " = 30' PROJECT #2012828 SHEET 1 OF 1