Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-111.-14-30OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY 11971 o��oF so�jyo� � O '�OOUNTI MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Leslie Weisman, Chair Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: January 29, 2013 Re: Coastal Consistency Review for ZBA File Ref NICHOLAS and BARBARA PALLANTE #6718 SCTM#1000-111-14-30. NICHOLAS and BARBARA PALLANTE #6718 - Request for Variances from Article XXII Code Section 280-116 and Article IV Code Section 280-18 based on an application for building permit and the Building Inspector's December 10, 2013 Notice of Disapproval concerning a permit for partial demolition and reconstruction of a single family dwelling, at; 1) proposed construction at less than the code required bulkhead setback of 75 feet, , 2) less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 50 feet, located at: 4302 Wunnewetta Road (adj. to Wunnewetta Pond) Cutchogue, NY. SCTM#1000-111-14-30. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the policy standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP provided the Board considers the following: Due to the proximity of the dwelling to surface waters it is recommended that the Board consider requiring the following conditions on the parcel to further Policy 5, and protect and improve the water quality and supply in the area, and protect the water quality of surface waters: i. Ground application of synthetic fertilizers, herbicides or pesticides on the parcel is prohibited. The use of native, drought -tolerant plants is recommended in new landscaping. iii. No fertilizers containing nitrogen, phosphorus, or potassium shall be utilized between November 1St and April 1St iv. The application of lawn fertilizer within 20 feet of any surface water except: where there is a vegetative buffer of at least 10 feet; or where the fertilizer is applied by a device with a spreader guard, deflector shield or drop spreader at least three feet from surface water is prohibited. V. A maximum of 1 pound of nitrogen per 1000 square feet in any one application, with a cumulative application of no more than 2 pounds per 1,000 square feet per year is permitted. vi. The use of phosphorous containing lawn fertilizer is prohibited unless establishing a new lawn or soil test shows that the lawn does not have enough phosphorus. Fertilizer labels have three bold numbers. The number in the middle is the percentage of phosphorus in the product, e.g. 22-0-15. Use of products with 0.67 in the middle or lower is not restricted. Products with a number higher than 0.67 may only be used if a new lawn is being established or a soil test indicates it is necessary. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Jennifer Andaloro, Assistant Town Attorney Office Location: Town Annex /First Floor, Capital One Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 January 2, 2014 OF SO(/jyo� ti O �O � i-Nc NV http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax (631) 765-9064 Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Southold, NY 11971 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. #6718 Pallante, Nicholas Dear Mark: AT, L�- f Mailing Address: 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 1000-111-14-30 We have received an application for partial demolition and reconstruction of a single family dwelling. A copy of the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval under Chapter 280 (Zoning Code), and survey map, project description form, are attached for your reference. Your written evaluation with recommendations for this proposal, as required under the Code procedures of LWRP Section 268-5D is requested within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie K. Weisman Chairp on , By: Encls. ----------- - ------------------------- PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8' = V -- --------- ...... ............. EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: I/Ir - I' NED ppb $4 REVISIONS 0 'c' F ad wo w -A Z 3,0 w 0 + Z < c*4 cd 0 ao M IT DRAWN: MH / MS SCALE: 114"=1'-0" JOB M N-mb. 18, 2013 SHEET NUMBER: A-1 EKING WEST ELEVATION REVISIONS U y e � u m Y Q U a z 0 � A W w °o a ad Q� zqz W <w H W A A Q a� o � a O a? x Ww z = z ^i N U o DRAWN: MH/MS SCALE: 1 /4-F-0" JOB 4: N --be 18, 2013 SHEET NUMBER: A-2 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION SUIS: IIW = P EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/9" = V REVISIONS Q 'eu U a1 yY. e a V a z 0 E- w oz a a0 Q �w dd a x ZO �o H w A A Q � o � a z z= NC) (d O a DRAWN: MH/MS SCALE: 1/4-1'-0" 108 A: Nmcmba 19, 2013 SHEET NUMBER: A-3 rrrwm 4J I I U - PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION SCALE: lAr = V r AM EXISTING EAST ELEVATION REVISIONS 0 ti N a a z h z `t u a z O F A w W ao E- 0 .. r -a off. d Q Aw � aw F. w f -r Q Q Q � o � a °wo} Oa � r�1 w w z= � a? U N O a DRAWN: MH / MS SCALE: JOB A: Nmemba 182 2013 SHEET NUMBER: A-4 DQSnNG 1ST, FLOOR PLAN SC3U.E: 1/8" a 1' REVISIONS 0 ti E A v z w vJ ._ G i a z 0 F~ � W oz a a0. d Ao Ci zr o 14 E-� w A A Q a� o z z= ►~�4 N V CD IT DRAWN: MH/MS SCALE: 1/4'1'-0" JOB N: N--ba 18, 2013 SHEET NUMBER: A-5 — I iUko' REVISIONS r m 5t w w z 0 � A W W °wz a as a o � A F-� w A A Q N o � a z ►�i w w z= NU R3 C a DRAWN: MH/MS SCALE: 1/4'=I' -F JOB p: Nwanb. 19, 2013 SHEET NUMBER: A-6 77, A e • i� '4 Z 6 K'S .Y rt y . � cl 1 r: Y 77, "r STREET ¢ y . x �IV'�1 1 �fv LOT: Ai& rzS ACR. R OWNER N oew d—rru W TYPE OF BUILDING fey`" SEAS. VL FARM COMM. CB. MISC. Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS i 4�t�+�. � ,�► a ales- r Q2 3 Id Ala -L 153 (,,,o eQA3 -e-rru �� ... L •' AGE .,_ BUILDING CONDITION x �, Z�; ' NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE •FARM Acre Value Per Value Acre Tillable 1 Titloble 2 a" Tfllable 3 Woodland ' Swampland FRONTAGE ON WATER Brushland FRONTAGE ON ROAD i:House Plot DEPTH BULKHEAD k.= Total DOCK C aif 4'0' A' , Z 1a va � r, � "' ; - ,1 a,n ,y a *". ■ 1 /�b7 1► iq r lA0 ' 3t. •Adat 3 - �� 1 x+ 5 Ab - •• SOMA e ' SCALE T'.t0a R 1.eNq S ado ao• 3 17 4.3A(c) a s 9M s M sA to \ 4 �° p•n 5 s % p" 1s I-IA(c) Om 10 (c gym'+ aA` 1.7A(c) <� 3 , a.• 5 1.4A5cj ^. 72 b Syj �►. y0 !s` is a'A 1t r 9 el se / aKU p• $ ' v F O +0 n — /��• 2swc) s ,b ,3 ,► o co(•F z e.-f.1Mq� �• 29 r01 CA (A \ to 30 %31 LLIM 3.a/(q ♦ ,9 ib p. O1.1Ne r+ Q :go rA c B 3.1N) a� ' 1ttiYE tn.tca I c, �; ' 7.1 �' a• a tat am ,3 O �� ,2 2p s -'d ,'i +r ♦ raio 1 i� 1 1_3(4_ r� ' t (q 1 A --__ •� $a• 2 -------- as ' ,o' 'm 22 5 < +�•; "� - - - ------ ' a•a * Mw M10 te' ; , ;-7Mq 1T r T a.sN0.' ala `j _ z1i °" a .o m• m�& ``� ®� P-4 20 16 7.1 lb 24 1.4A(q L '+ r J' 12� 73, 1 , �, - d'. 7.2 •.0 aw p0 2.aNcl a , j a' d•'� 27.1 )Wn, a� .► 1n( p,. ; is• ' 1.7Nq or �+ A� 29 P'A ' S -A- -WC) bq ,Q ,, 30 m o• S K OM r 1.4A(C) 31 a'• - - 1.4 A0 LOWTA • 2.aMq FOR PCL NO. i•w `� 2 -�`' SEE SEC. NO. o' .a . sr �, ,• as � " ��/90 \- 9 p.Q - , yw MATCH SN11 NE _ 0 Zu �L/J��©�� �• i - MATCH IJNE 4, ♦ 15 \. •O 19 G N3065R 46 1� __—_—_ — ..,,,„,. --„-- •�a••,,,�„R �„o,a,� (Nonce COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © K 10YMIOi SOUTHOLD SECTION NO _ .iewA.nlElalwwm•.ac ++.�. (2t) O o...w -- — •A..arw --w-- waa� ane .wro WADWICE.AL1731A3MCSALEOft RP.aIP�O�('l)/TBXSE"•IVIC6A��1C�/ v 134 F wrrs.Yu. -- nrwawu..--.•r-- _ "'°'wR anwaunoN OFAfAf AORfgN es ilE 171 %SAACE OF a.., .. -- •.y.� _ _ ••1ee C••.n C.... w..e■. 4 N Y "m 134 1 1 1 . -- - uY' _ --�-- ...,_a.�.,�--• - •IFfOIlG4pIN1Y9•(YM6.AO•M,Ea .w a� A . ... . - . , , _ .. ,lw�a.r.a�.— ..... - —w.— ww•.gQ lawwoNoc l/E m • s. w A -'' -. - ._ -.. �_,� ..- �:..., .. •.,�-;,: _ � - .. wvbor, _:- _.. -. ...:. P omuer 1000 PROPERTY MM III 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK PREVIOUS ACTIONS OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS IN SEC.111-14/15 RELATIVE TO THIS APPLICATION FOR VARIANCES 1. File. 2461: 111-15-1.6 Granted a request to construct a dwelling with insufficient front,yard setback. 2. File. 5034: 111-14-36.6 Granted a request to locate an addition to an existing dwelling 64' from the bulkhead. 3. File. 4568: 111-14-22.1 Granted a request to build an inground pool 38' from a bulkhead and build an extended deck 45'from the highwater line. 4. File. 6653: Granted a request to construct additions and alterations to an existing dwelling 45' from a bulkhead. 5. File 3559: 111-14-07 Granted a request to construct an addition to a dwelling 28.9' from front yard setback of 35' 6. File 6128: 111-14-15 Granted a request for an accessory building 39' from front yard setback 7. File 5932: 111-14-13 Granted a request to construct an open deck 62' from the bulkhead TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK DATE ...Sept . 6, 1978 1 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS - is /. 6 Appeal No. 2461 Dated July 27, 1978 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To Thomas A. and Rosa Fucile (Gary F. Olsen.. Esq.) Appellant 50 East 89th Street New York, New York at a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on August 17, 1978 the appeal was considered and the action indicated below was taken on your ( ) Request for variance due to lack of access to property ( ) Request for a special exception under the Zoning Ordinance ( 30 Request for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance 1. SPECIAL EXCEPTION. By resolution of the Board it was determined that a special exception ( ) be granted ( ) be denied pursuant to Article .................... Section .................... Subsection .................... paragraph .................... of the Zoning Ordinance and the decision of the Building Inspector ( ) be reversed { ) be confirmed because 7:45 P.M. (D . S . T .) Upon application of Thomas A. and Rosa Fucile, 50 East 89th Street, New York, (Gary F. Olsen, Esq.) £or a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 and Bulk Schedule for permission to construct a dwelling with insufficient front yard setback. Location of property: Bayberry Road, and Bridge Lane, Nassau Point, Cutchogue, New York, bounded on the north by Hillmer; east by Hillmer; south by Bridge Lane; west by Bayberry Road. 2. VARIANCE. By resolution of the Board it was determined that (a) Strict application of the Ordinance (would) (would not) produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship because SEE REVERSE (b) The hardship created (is) (is not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district because SEE REVERSE (c) The variance (does) (does not) observe the spirit of the Ordinance and (would) (would not) change the character of the district because SEE REVERSE f After investigation and inspection, the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to construct a house on a parcel of land containing 1.4 acres of land which has two front yards, one facing on Bayberry Road and the other on Bridge Lane. Many of the houses in Nassau Point do have 35 foot front yards. In some in- stances are in the road bed and the road runs into the lawn. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of the property and in the same use district; and the variance will not change the character of the neighborhood and will observe the spirit of the Ordinance. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Douglass, it was RESOLVED that Thomas A. and Rusa Fucile, 50 East 89th Street, New York, be GRANTED permission to construct a dwelling with insufficient front yard. Location of property: Bayberry Road and Bridge Lane, Nassau Point, Cutchogue, New York, bounded on the north by Hillmer; east by Hillmer; south by Bridge Lane; west by Bayberry Road, upon the following condition: The building shall be located at least 50 feet from the northerly line, 50 feet from the easterly line, and at least 40 feet from Bayberry Road. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs: Gillispie, Grigonis, Doyen, Tuthill and Douglass. FILIED BY til,. SOU 1: T0771,1 71,1 CLERK DATE /,;7f HOUR �D EA15 BOARD MEMBERS Gerard R Goehringer, Chairman Lydia A. Tortora George Horning ;�,� • Ruth D. Oliva Vincent Orlando 0 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Hall 53095. Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 765-1809 http://southoldtown.noithfork.net FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF MARCH 28; 2002 Appl.' No...5034 � Ru4t Fa iily'.Partnership Parcel.. 111.-1.4-3,.6 BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's October2, 2001. Notice of Disapproval regarding applicant'ss: request' -for ,a :building permit to.:locate an: addition to the dwelling Vsrith a:aetbaok:of 15 feet:from the fro'h%fpropertyline and at 64 = feet:frQm the bulkhead, at: its closest ;points. Thq:rgaSons stated in the Notice .is that the front yard is required to be:a.,i inimum 050 feet.ur d6rSect16h"l00-2448- and the bulO. ead;setback is required to be. a mirkimum of. 75 feet. under Section 100-239.413, and the addition .does not. meet the: minimum requirements. AREA:: VARIANCE R*QUJSTED; Applicant requested: (a) :an .Interpretation as to vvhether.'or'nt this i;a side yard instead of a front yard:,:. (b) an area variance for the proposed:aeition(s),:':Tlir`.northerly end. of the. addition: would, extend 31 feet from the northwest sid$:,of. the ,dwelling, leaving a setback of 15: feet from an area depicted as a 'la'ne'' or:right of�Wziy�-(ref:,Opplicant's survey). The addition will have a length bf 6.3 feet which::iiicl.udes ani open porch. 'The entire addition is showm'af a minimum of 64 feet from�the�bu(kf�:�ad: FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on thisapplication on December 13, 2001, January 24; 2002,.and February 28, 2002, at which' times written and oral evidence was. presented. Based upon all. testimony, documentation,. personal -inspection of theproperty and:'the area, and other evidence,, the Zoning Board finds the following facts -lo -be true and relevant. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: The .applicant's property is located:on the southeast side of Wugneweta Road.in Cutchogue and is more particularly shown. on the survey prepared by' Peconic Surveyors ..Map. 00-148, surveyed September 11, .2000, revised October 3, 2001. REASONS.. FOR BOARD ACTION: IN ACCORDANCE :WITH THE REVIEW STANDARDS.SET FORTH:IN TOWN LAW 2676-3 "AREA VARIANCES," THE BOARD HAS CONSIDERED THE BENEFIT TO THE APPLICANT IF THE VARIANCE IS GRANTED, AS WEIGHED AGAINST THE DETRIMENT TO THE HEALTH, ,SAFETY. AND WELFARE OF THE ;NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY BY SUCH GRANT, AND DETERMINES THAT`. Page 2 — March. 28, 20u—' Appl. No. 5034 — Rust Family Partnership. Parcel 111.-14-34 at Cutchogue 1. Grant .of. the area. variance will not,.produce.an undesirable, change in.,the, character. of. the neighborhood or detriment�tonearby properties.: The.applicant's.propertj!.consists of 1.4+- acres, and there are other lots which contain dwellings also of a similar size. The addition can be shielded from the property to the north by landscaping. Also by testimony from the neighbor's attorney, the houses are about .50 ft. apart including the existing footpath between the properties.. 2. The benefit. sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, .feasible for the applicant fo pursue, other than an area variance, due to the location of the established driveway and the existing sharp elevation adjacent to the dwelling. 3. The alleged difficulty has not been self-created 4... The variance granted will nothave. an adverse effect or impact..on the..physical or environmental conditions in the. neighborhood or district due to the size and shape of the properties in the surrounding area and the size and layout of applicant's property. 5: Grant of the.requested variance is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable applicant to enjoy the benefit of an addition to the existing dwelling, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the community. BOARD RESOLUTION ACTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors,. and applyin,g.the balancing test.under.New York Town Law, motion was offered by Chairman Goehringer, seconded by Member Orlando, and duly carried, to DENY .the relief requested for a 15 ft. side yard ' setback, and to ALTERNATIVELY GRANT a 20 ft. minimum side yard .setback at its closest point, and a setback of 64+- feet from the bulkhead as applied for, SUBJECT to the.following CONDITION: An appropriate :landscape screening shall be provided and properly..maintained in good' condition at all times, by the owner, to be located along the northwesterly side of the addition, and the Board reserves the right to review the type and location of screening before a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that violates. the Zoning Code, other than .such '.uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Page. 3 — March 28, 2002 AOPL No. 5034 -Rust Family Partnership Parcel 11 1.T14-34 at tutchogue Vote of the Board: Ayes-, Members Goehringer (Chairman), Tortora, and. Orlando. (Merhber Oliva abstained from vote.) (Member Homing of Fishers Island was absent as authorized.) Thit Resolution was duly adopted (3-0). Nota foe the rec6rd:.-With regard to applicant4s request- foran jnterpretation, the Board was. hot able to garner the votes. requ'iredfo #orrrt� to on. ) . Y GG P. Qoehringer, Chairman RECEIVED AND FILED BY TBE S0UT!-',',QLD T014114 C, y i.�_ -you -,, z . O(D /7 L "Sel .1010 r' , Tovrzi of eld Jc k ? APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman James Dinizio, Jr. Lydia A. Tortora Lora S. Collins George Horning BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ZBA Fax (516) 765-9064 Telephone (516) 765-1809 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF JUNE 23, 1998 Appl. No. 4568 - DOMINICK SEGRETE PARCEL 1000-111-14-22.1 (formerly 21 + 22) STREET & LOCALITY: 4000 Wunneweta Road, Nassau Point Club Properties, Cutchogue DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: June 11, 1998 FINDINGS OF FACT PROPERTY FACTS/ DESCRIPTION: The subject property is located along the westerly side of Wunneweta ltoad, at Nassau Point Club Properties, Cutchogue. The parcel consists of a total lot area of 19,274 sq. ft. to tie lines along high water. The September 29, 1989 survey submitted by applicant shows an existing single-family dwelling located at 15 feet from the front property line and 15+- feet from the southerly side property line, at the closest points. To the west is the highwater area, bulkheaded in part. Timber walls and blacktop areas exist at the premises in an approximate northwest location. RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant is requesting a variance from the . bulkhead setback provisions for a proposed 20' x 37' inground pool with an extended deck area at the rear of the dwelling. The Landscape Design Plan and survey sketch shows the setback proposed at 33 feet at its closest point from the bulkhead and at 48 feet from the most southerly point (highwater mark) along Wunneweta Pond. BASIS OF APPEAL: Zoning Code, Article XXII, Section 100-239.4B, based upon the Building Inspector's April 9, 1998 Notice of Disapproval, disapproving a building permit application for an inground pool and deck addition due to its proposed location within 75 feet from the bulkhead, concrete wall, rip rap or similar structure. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: In considering this application, the Board finds that a variance to allow construction of the proposed pool and deck with a minimum setback from the bulkhead of 38 feet is the minimum necessary and adequate and at the same time will preserve and protect the Page 2 - June 23, 1998 Meeting ZBA Appl. #4568 = DOMINICK SEGRETE Parcel 1000-111-14-22.1 character of the neighborhood, and the health, safety and welfare of the community. 1. Grant of an area variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The applicant has provided a landscape plan to address neighbor's concerns that should provide suitable buffering. No other impacts are anticipated. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance because the property is triangular-shaped and no other sites are available that are conforming. 3. The variance granted is substantial and represents a reduction in the code required 75 ft. minimum setback. 4. The difficulty has been self-created and relates to the applicant's desire to build a pool and deck. 5. The proposed variance will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because the neighborhood properties are wooded and the applicant has agreed to condition approval upon a landscaping plan that will help buffer the pool from adjacent properties. RESOLUTION/ACTION : On motion by Member Collins, seconded by Member Dinizio, it was RESOLVED, to DENY the 33 -ft. setback as requested, and TO GRANT THE FOLLOWING ALTERNATIVE SETBACK RELIEF: 1. Pool at its closest point to be a minimum of 38 feet from the bulkhead and a minimum of 48 feet to the highwater line. 2. The deck shall be cut back to be in line with the existing deck and approximately 45 feet from highwater line. 3. Applicant shall provide landscaping pursuant to a landscaping plan, similar to the plan submitted June 17, 1998. VOTE OF THE BOARD: TORTORA, COLLINS, adopted (5-0). AYES: MEMBERS GOEHRINGER, DINIZIO, and HORNINB-� This Resolution was duly ,ERARD P. GOEHRIN **********************`Approved for Filing 11114-22.1/111-14-22.1 �T AND FILED BY C9 LIR 'I--1GLD TOWN CLU- K DAT ('1a flid HOUO' 3 0/1p . I _a6wa.z". . Town Clerk, Town of Southold j BOARD MEMBERS Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Eric Dantes Gerard P. Goehringer George Horning Ken Schneider http://southoldtown.northfork.net Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road -P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office LQ cation: Town Annex /First Floor, Capital One Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 - Fax (631) 765-9064 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF JUNE 20, 2013 P26 -- 17 J3 So thold Town Clerk ZBA FILE: 6653 NAME OF APPLICANT: Arthur Skelskie and Nan Molofsky SCTM 1000-111-14-36.8 PROPERTY LOCATION: 510 Bayberry Road, (adj. to Wunneweta Pond) Cutchogue, NY SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type 11 category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated May 15, 2013, stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county -wide or inter -community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated May 23, 2013. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION • The Applicants' property is an irregularly shaped, conforming 104,910 sq. ft. parcel, with 76,199 sq. ft. of buildable upland area, located in the R-40 Zone. The northerly lot line measures 172.22 ft. The easterly lot line measures 184.11 ft along Bayberry Road; and the southerly lot line measures 301.92 ft. The westerly lot line consists of an irregularly shaped peninsula comprised of some upland and some tidal wetlands that extends into Wunneweta Pond. The property is improved with a single family dwelling, as shown, including the proposed areas of new additions and alterations, on the survey drawn by Nathan Taft Corwin 111, Land Surveyor, last revision dated April 2, 2013. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article XMI Section 280-116 (B) and Article IV, Section 280-18 and the Building Inspector's April 3, 2013 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit for additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling at; l) less than the code required bulkhead setback of 75 feet, 2) less than the code required rear yard setback of 50 feet. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests a variance for a nonconforming 45 foot bulkhead setback, where Code requires a 75 foot setback. The applicant requests a second variance for a nonconforming 45 foot rear yard setback, where Code requires a 50 foot setback. Page 2 of 3 - June 20, 2013 ZBAI16653 - Skelskie/Molofsky SCPMN 1000-1 l 1-14.36.8 FINDINGS OF FACT/ REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on June 6, 2013, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The Applicants have a large, conforming size parcel in the R- 40 Zone. Total lot coverage, based up calculation of the buildable upland area, is proposed at 4.97%. Most of the construction will be done within the existing building footprint. Alterations and additions to single-family dwellings are common and customary in a residential zone. The subject property is screened from view by adjacent neighbors by mature evergreens privacy screening. 2. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the Applicants cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The pre-existing single-family dwelling has over -lapping non -conforming bulkhead and rear yard setbacks, and the proposed alterations and additions cannot be constructed without the granting of variances. 3. Town Law 6267-b(3)(b)(3). The variance granted herein for a 45 feet bulkhead setback is mathematically substantial, representing 40% relief from the code required 75 feet. However, this distance is measured to the Applicants' nearest corner of the pre-existing attached garage, which was built, along with the single family dwelling, in the 1920's. All proposed new construction will have greater setbacks, with the exception of a proposed outdoor shower that will have a setback of no less than 46 feet. The variance granted herein for a 45 feet rear yard setback is not mathematically substantial, representing 10% relief from the code required 50 feet, and reflects the minimum setback to a corner of the pre-existing garage. 4. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The Applicants must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code. The Applicants will construct a new septic system, and build drywells to accommodate all storm water roof runoff, and the discharge from the outdoor shower, and they will remove a paved driveway and replace it with one made with pervious stone materials, complete with grates and other drywells built into the new driveway. The Applicants will connect with public water, and abandon an existing on site well. A 10 feet non -turf buffer will be installed adjacent to, and extending from the area containing the bulkhead. 5. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. 6. Town Law 4267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of alterations and new additions to the existing single family dwelling, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Horning, seconded by Member Goehringer, and duly carried, to GRANT, the variances as applied for, and shown on the survey prepared by Nathan Taft Corwin III, Land Surveyor, last revision dated April 2, 2013, and the architectural drawings by Mark K. Schwartz, AIA labeled Skelskie House Additions and Alterations, sheets A-lthrough A-12 dated April 4, 2013. Page 3 of 3 — June 20, 2013 7-BAt16653 — Skclskic/Molofsky SCTMk 1000-111-14-36.8 Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays andlor a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variances) granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other .feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Weisman (Chairperson), Goehringer, Schneider, Horning, Dantes. This Resolution was duly adopted (5-0). Leslie Kanes Weisr Approved for filing in, Chai erson 6 /2 /2013 �. Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765.1809 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3559 Application Dated September 17, 1986 TO: Mr. Jerry L. Horton lk!, ( ,•... w [Appellant (s) ] as Builder/Agent for L. VANODDENA`6-�`,,"" 600 Eastward Court Mattituck, NY 11952 At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on October 10, 1986 the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property New York Town Law, Section 280-a [ ] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance Article , Section [X] Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance Article III , Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule [ ] Request for Application of LENIARDUS AND MARIE VANOUDENALLEN for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article .III.,"Section. 10.0.-31 for permission to construct addition to dwelling with an insufficient frontyard setback, at 230 Sailor's Lane, Cutc.hogue, NY; District 1000, Section 111, Block 1.4, Lot 07. WHEREAS, a public hearing was.held and concluded on October 2, 1986 in the Matter of the Application of'LEONARDUS AND MARIE VANOUDENALLEN under Appeal No. 3559; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the board made the following findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is a described parcel located along the north side of Sailors Lane, Cutchogue, and is more particularly shown and identified on the Suffolk County. Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 114, Block 14, Lot 7. 1) Tho c„h;or+ nrnmicac, rnnt.ainc a let area of aDDroximatelV Page 2 - Appeal No. 3559 Matter of LEONARDUS'& MARIE VANOUDENALLEN Decision Rendered Fr.i ay, _Octobe.r. 10, .1.986 cul-de-sac at 28'9" at its closest point and 32'2" at the south- westerly corner of the proposed addition. 4. Article III, Section 100-31, Column "A" of the Bulk Schedule requires a minimum fro.ntyard setback at 35 feet. The relief requested is 6'4", or a percentage of 20% of the requirements. 5. The proposed addition will be in line with the existing angle of the dwelling and will not.protrude or be of unusual character. In considering this appeal, the board also finds and determines: (a) the configuration of the lot lends to the unique circumstances of this application; (b) the variance will not in turn cause a substantial effect of increased population density or be adverse to the safety, health, wel- fare, comfort, convenience, order of the town; (c) the practical difficulties are sufficient; (d) there will be no substantial detriment to adjoining properties; (e) the relief requested is not substantial; (f) in view of the manner in which the difficulties arose and in considering the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by granting the variance, as noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Sawicki, it was RESOLVED, that the relief requested under Appeal No. 3559 in the Matter of the Application of*LEONARDUS AND MARIE VANOUDENALLEN for an insufficient frontyard setback at not ess than 28 feet as shown by survey amended September 16, 1986, prepared by Roderick VanTuyl,.P.C., BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Douglass and Sawicki. (Member Doyen, Fishers Island, was absent due to illness.) This resolution was duly adopted. lk 4RARD P. GOER INGER, AIRMAN October 13, 1986 RE, yEIVED AND FILED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOW14 Ci.I: LLK nikTr //I iv -fid 14013R �'<90r" APPEALS BOARD MEMBERSQ Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Ruth D. Oliva James Dinizio, Jr. Michael A. Simon Leslie Kanes Weisman �✓ MailingAddress: Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road - P.O. Box 1 179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex /First Floor, North Fork Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD R EIIVED Tel. (631) 765-1809 - Fax (631) 765.9064 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATCI;, MEETING OF MARCH 13, 2008 UW ZB File # 6128 — Application of ANTHONY E. and CAROL MITAROTONDO Property Location: 950 Little Peconic Bay Road, Cutchogue CTM 111-14-15 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued a reply dated Februaiy 5, 2008 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant countywide or inter -community impact. LWRP EXEMPT: This application is exempt under Town Code LWRP Chapter 268, since no natural resource feature was found within 100 feet of the shed requested under this zoning variance. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's property consists of 46,622 square feet overall, with frontage along the south side of Little Peconic Bay Road and along the west side of a 15 -wide path that leads to Wunneweta Pond. The property is improved with a single-family dwelling with garage under, as shown on the site survey last dated September 12, 2007, prepared by Nathan Taft Corwin III, L.S. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for a Variance under Sections 280-15, based on the Building Inspector's January 7, 2008 Notice of Disapproval concerning a proposed accessory shed with a front yard setback at less than the code -required 50 feet and side yard setback less than the code -required 15 feet. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on February 28, 2008 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, Page 2 — March 13, 2007 ZBA * 6128 — Application of A. an . Mitarotondo CTM 111.14.15 documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: The relief that is being requested concerns a proposed 12 ft. by 8 ft. accessory building for the owner's use as a utility storage/potting shed. The shed is requested at 39 feet from the front lot line adjacent to the road and 5 feet from the westerly lot line. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: During the February 28, 2008 the Board discussed with the applicant's agent the need to move the building for more code conformity, for a proposed setback from the westerly property line at seven feet instead of five feet, which was accepted since no testimony could be offered to prevent the increased setback. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(3)(1). Grant of alternative relief will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties because the 12 by 8 foot shed is proposed as a potting landscaping storage shed with a sink in area where detached accessory structures are prevalent, and the proposed design mirrors that of the house and other accessory structures. 2. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(2). The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance because the proposed location is the only general location free from interference with other existing structures and outside the jurisdiction of the Town Trustees, and therefore presumably environmentally preferable. 3. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(3). The alternative relief granted is not substantial because the structure is permitted in the front yard because of the waterfront location. However, the setback requirement cannot be met due the topography of the lot and the presence of a large tree. 4. Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has not been self created. 5. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(4). No evidence was submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. Grant of alternative relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy use of the potting/utility storage shed, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Weisman, seconded by Chairman Goehringer, and duly carried, to APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman Gerard R Goehringer James Dinizio, Jr. Michael A. Simon Leslie Kanes Weisman http://southoldtown.northfork.net emawng Address: Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road - P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex /First Floor, North Fork Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 - Fax (631) 765-9064 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 14, 2006 ZB File No. 5932 - THOMAS CAVANAGH Property Location: 600 Little Peconic Bay Road, Cutchogue CTM 111-14-13 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's property contains 29,643 square feet in area with 94.52 feet along Little Peconic Bay Road in Cutchogue. The property is improved with a 1-1/2 story, single-family dwelling with accessory garage and accessory shed, shown on the February 15, 2006 survey prepared by Peconic Surveyors, P.C. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Zoning Code Section 280-116 (formerly 100-239.4), based on the Building Inspector's May 1, 2006 Notice of Disapproval concerning a proposed deck addition to the dwelling which will be less than the minimum 75 feet from the existing wood bulkhead. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on August 31, 2006, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance for a proposed deck at 62 feet measured from the bulkhead in the most southeasterly yard, as shown on the February 15, 2006 site survey, amended April 25, 2006 by Peconic Surveyors, P.C. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Grant of the variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The applicant's property is 233.95 feet in depth measured from the street to the bulkhead along Wunneweta Pond. An open, unroofed deck is proposed at the rear of the dwelling, of which only a 13 feet section is nonconforming, resulting in a 62 ft. setback instead of the code -required 75 feet minimum to the bulkhead. The bulkhead runs in Page 2 — September 14, 2006 • . 213 File No. 5932 — Thomas Cavanagh CTM No. 111-14-13 an east -west direction for 97.33 feet, however the 44.85 ft. tie line section runs north -south along a stone wall and steps adjacent to the pond. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. 3. The variance granted herein is substantial. Although the reduction is substantial for 13 feet, the portion requested in this variance amounts to approximately 50 square feet of structural area, which is minor in nature. 4. The difficulty has been self-created, having knowledge of the site elements and designed construction. 5. No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 6. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a deck addition, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Weisman, seconded by Chairwoman Oliva, and duly carried, to GRANT the variance as applied for, shown on the February 15, 2006 site survey, amended April 25, 2006 by Peconic Surveyors, P.C., subject to the condition that the deck shall be 'open to the sky.' Any deviation from the variance given such as extensions, or demolitions which are not shown on the applicant's diagrams or survey site maps, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Oliva (Chairwoman), Goehringer and Weisman. (Absent were: Member Dinizio and Member Simon) his Resolution was duly adopted (3-0). -6 , ml�� Ruth D. Oliva 10/.26/06 Approved for Filing i��iT►C 7 �.� " _ ► �-� 7 RECErVED UEC 3 1 P30ARD OFAPPEAtS REVISIONS 0 U.J �7 U 4 Zo W y xxox 40 � Vw O� A � a O ¢Z r� w Cd NU DRAWN: MH MS SCALE: I/4"=1'-0" JOB k: December 31.2013 SHEET NUMBER: A-5 EXISTING LOT COVERAGE OVER flP7JA/D ARRA f46 203 se_ ft.) OFlCRPTIOM AREA N LOT COVERAGE COSTr9 HOUSE 1}79 t9. 0. 5.401 ABM" PSA SIATE PORCHES STE 797 p. M. 1.7% PAVER PAM 406 N. M. 0." WOOO WALK A DECK 776 p. H. 1.7X TOTAL EXISTING 3,544 N. H. 7.701 81.07' PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE OVER rrPlA rn ARRA (46.203 so. ft.) DExRIPTHON - AREA N LOT EXTSTIND HOUSE 1.679 w N. 3.401 PROPOSED ADDITIONS 40 w /l. 0.901 PROP44ED DARADE N1 try 11. 1.5% PROPOSED PORCHES 1.732 w IH. 2.701 EXIST. WOOD WALK A OECI 778 w H. 1.701 TOTAL PNKO'OS[0 13.144 w. H. f It 2x S 82.56518 W / 4P/V J./ A,n3' TEST HOLE DATA (TEST HDIE DUG O J ON JULY S. 2013) r talc rUY we r Y .0 luew M rt r r SURVEY OF P/0 LOT 246 AMENDED MAP 'i1 ' OF NASSAU POINT OWNED BY NASSAU POINT CLUB PROPERTIES, INC. FILE No. 156 FILED AUGUST 16, 1922 SITUATE CUTCHOGUE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK S.C. TAX No. 1000-111-14-30 SCALE 1"=20' DECEMBER 16, 2009 AUGUST 31, 2011 ADDED PROPOSED DECK OCTOBERS. 2011 REVISE PROPOSED DECK SEPTEMBER 19, 2013 UPDATE SURVEY NOVEMBER 13, 2013 PROPOSED HOUSE AREA = 50,504 sq. ft. (TO TIE LINE 1.159 cc. A BULKHEAD) CERTIFIED TO: NCHOLAS AND BARBARA PALLANTE CITIMORTGAGE, Inc. ALPHA ABSTRACT TITLE No. ALP11395 NOTES,1.ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.G.V.D. 1929 DATUM EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS: ,o^ EXISTING CONTOUR ONES ARE SHOWN THUS:— AST ILIM0 6ttWE Hans flit - WOCs f1p911 T.s - SOP p RASIrAD I s - mIIDN p sAPrAD I.w. - Tp p WlL sw. - 60CW p r1a 2. PROPOSED SEPTIC SYSTEM FOR 5-6 BEDROOMS PROPOSED FUTURE SOLE EXPANSION POOL ® PROPOSED B' DIA. X 4' DEEP LEACHING POOL 0O NK PROPOSED 1.300 GALLON SEPTIC TA 3. THE LOCATION OF WELLS AND CESSPOOLS SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM FIELD OBSERVATIONS AND/OR DATA OBTAINED FROM OTHERS. 4. FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION TAKEN FROM: FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP No. 36103CO502 H ZONE AE: BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINED ZONE X: AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.27E ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN. DETAIL A PROPOSED SEPTIC SYSTEM DETAIL (NOT TO SCALE) FURTHEST LEACHING POOL OF A 3 POOL SYSTEM SEPTIC TANK (1) _ pOp IAC aWr.[tlI�/dlp� Af le �t E�6ilsl o�litA�llt�t wt lAp rllPt _ Pl' >bIIOY�IIC V f Wl IO/COO A I<•Irt EpIYI 11 � � p. P. 1 rAl`NING POOL_ t3) a 1MID O IIIc M AI. • rRCIM. •MIO 1rCT lagit rNr ,q . f A t pipY xOt t KO q " svlrLL /"/. ria sxu a .tRIH" r uw w r scNIR lwr • ui lawn p al/•l '. as 1mW r oo. r r Mw Y lwal O p wltnam Ylo p .a 4tt6 2 .ear Aa A Is ownAwll9 p rIG1 Iter® oolta Its NsS1 ONR RI's91 f9TR Mt .IIS ,IOIn fMLL R rrWO. r' 42EN ,IOM dMp'Otla OeM3tR (p DOW. .. IW wr sols H6ri6a NIR®, oras Taelr tD r9q UR R1AL a Wrrrm i"'.rww at�'mliul srwAeIs ivle na�aua rwra 30ARD OF APPEALS ror"�'ils s°�XNEr sN A1O1A1°"waAroK a'OM rLL NM TROP Is M 1!t YOIa rut IO K"Ros Us. 11R I/HDpHIR1E1V11E = M AMS D1foT9Io 9poi1401 arnL 141 Is aNnoHH® ro N A trrT. =I-mw wa{ =o IIOmN a, wlrl alY ro M POIOH AR wxOt M PAM' 4 110NO, M0 ON K6 44W/ ro M MI 1/IIO MD��MOM A M AR91®p M Ulpa NIF IVAOII Q]IIwK"IONf Na la IIM1pDGaf. M [DSaMCE p RISK p 1MYS A1n/44 EAMYp117 p Room. r AHr, HOT S110tN Ala 1m 611ARAwTQD. HYAO w 4ttaar,Z PILI M KM11Y Is Its""`"'"" Nathan Taft Corwin IN Land Surveyor NY.S. UO. W. SD16) Suer I Te: 9aKtY AJ. . S. LS I t Sunt - SalAti.st _ S2. Plan - O oth by L'a PHONE (631)727-200 Fm (631)727-1727 OFFICESIOGIM AT IIIKSO A9GTFS5 1396 Ya, Rett ►.a 0. 16 JWMPKL NA YaL 11947 JalO.ywL Ntu Yolk 11947 �gq FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: December 10, 2013 To: Michael Kimack for N & B Pallante 29 Heights Rd. Fort Salonga, NY 11768 Please take notice that your application dated November 20, 2013 For partial demolition & reconstruction of a single family dwelling at Location of property 4302 Wunnewetta Road, Cutchogue, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 — Section 111 Block 14 Lot 30 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article XXII Section 280-116 which states: " All buildings or structures located on lots upon which a bulkhead, ... and which are adjacent to tidal water bodies other than sounds shall be set back not less than 75 feet from the bulkhead." The survey indicates the construction is at approximately 54' from the bulkhead. In addition the proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article IV, Section 280-18 which states: "No building... shall be erected or altered in the R40 District unless the same conforms to the requirements of the Bulk Schedule..." The required front yard setback in the R40 Zone is 50'. Upon completion of the construction, the dwelling will be setback 31'. Authorized Signature Note: Trustees, DEC & Health Dept. also required. ivwly BUILDI XVQ TOWN HA SOUTHO TEL: (631)' FAX: (63:1) SoutholdlTo V 11971 Examined_ , 20 PERMIT NO. 13U1LL)INU FbKMI I AYYLIC;A 11UN UHhU&L1J 1 Do you have of need the -following, before applying? Board of Health 4 sets of Building Plans Planning Board approval Survey Check Septic Form N.Y.S.D.E.C. Trustees C.O. Application Flood Permit Single & Separate Storm -Water Assessment Form Contact: Approved , 20 Mail to: Disapproved"a/c Phone: Expiration , 20 — E C E " �i1. -�� Building Inspector D l; 1. I` U t� PLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT NOV. 2 0 2013 Date .20 I ' I INSTRUCTIONS ;stGac.•oFPc .. .. letely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 4 sets of plans,,i j*m to scale. Fee according to schedule. b. Pio I`wation of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and c. T ::by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d, Upb� oiie application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit shall be kept.Qri'... vaitable for inspection throughout the work. e,1 °` 11re occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Ce U.Macy. f. Eve" # pfern it shall expire.if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of issuance or ra r Feted within '18 months from such date. If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property. 14. J~ d at:the interim,`the Buil4ing Inspector may authorize, in writing, the extension of the permit for an addition six;.: .;,WeWr, a new pen -nit shall be required. Ay 51WREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone._ of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or Regulations, for` hi ,�trnOlbn of buildings, additions, or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described. The applicant agree xo` lrwith all applicable laws, ordinances, building code, housing code, and regulations, and to admit authorized inspeetorsvtat1 premises and in building for necessary inspections. Signature of applicant or name, if a corporation) (Mailing address of applicant State whether apnt is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder Name of owper=;QJ4W0b ses A&C,&&gCAS' (As on the tax roll or latest deed) If applicant is "al4'IIt signature of duly authorized officer Builders.! Plumbers: Other Tial. 1. Logia proposed work will be done: Mm "71 p$. Hoose " Street Hamlet County ..WOO Section /l'% Block Lot 30 2. Stag,;" upancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a 'tel occupancy � .wd b aid occupancy RACLh�ff& 77,44 3. Na n 9;rtich TIMapplicable): New Building Addition X Alteration Repa&�,4,. ':oval Demolition Other Work (Description) 4. EstfirA ;`,; Fee (To be paid on filing this application) 5. If dw0. b*&-.' r of dwelling units G Number of dwelling units on each floor ohXX i/% If ga of ears 6. If busies rt ' 'mal or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use. N1i4 7. Dimensi ,' structures, if any: Front_,[ 9. /C -T Reaz_Z6l Depth S't �"T. Height Number of Stories r'wc Dimension* 'arms structure with alterations or additions: Front,je J'1,16eygY Rear Depth Height Number of Stories 7ieZ 8. DimenWe0s,,oV%Ve new construction: Front JX!5 .I1/.A/5Y Rear `iDepth' yg Height r Number of Stories 7 w 1ti , 9. Size of lcri 1;;, J_r. Reary"ADepth 10. Date of P ' *'" - Name of Former Owner 11. Zone ar i h premises are situated if 4 d f 12. Does pts t fion violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? YES -9 -NO 13. Wi111 NO Will excess fill be removed from premises? YES NO 14. Name 15 a. Is feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES X NO * IF YES; TRUSTEES & D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. b. Is feet of a tidal wetland? * YES X NO * IF Y hvIAY BE REQUIRED. 16. Pro -accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 17. If el , +'property is at ,10 feet or below, must provide topographical data on survey. 5-777, " 4k 18. Are th end restrictions with respect to this property? * YES NO IF YLA'.. Y. STATE OF N COUNTY being duly sworn, deposes and says that (s)q is the applicant (Nntract) above named, CONN E D. BUNCH Notary PLQc, SWO of N*w York (S@is the No.018Ue1d6t4 otic (Contractor, Agent, Corporate Officer, etc.)40 Comm+ Expi n � 14, 2f of said owge Y isAuly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application; that all stain is application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief;and that the work will be performed in the application filed therewith. Sworn to 2013 Signature of Applicant -i.w�^, Ilk- ILt-3o aot IV 10 0. �' 1 t' &�S I V. Ib d OF � MENHADEN to 118 -- CEO sou Q 1 OM 6 21 Z- eo 1e 16.1 7 2 00 • n 162 3Qm an 00 9-0 17 ' eo on p� 15 A 16 00 M 6 7 15 1.IA(q. ,6 9 16 s o - 13 7 P� 90_ ' 12 9 s 1'+ too Wa',a,� vn ryn o01 11 19 cog ,A yP` •� C1 00, RO 28 8 16 ,2 Qy, \ Z A A 27 ra' s ♦6 ,3 N \ cl 1W� 1 16 op + 23A(C) d 6 2 3p ,�-f.1A(gNeq da "• rp1' 00 pANC� `\ � ' s0 19 17 Kat yA 1 pn' 30 11 '' p •\ -"9 1.1A(C 2 ♦ 16 � © , 1 cn rd' 1 ' 1•°l '� •\ 001 ,• 4 QO, au(q 1 0 i' A A• aiC ,1 1.eA(q ko 2.2 p s < 20 4P 11.2 47• '� :2.0k-) 6, V` 1 7.7A(q io 00 pa' pot 721 23 at ' q A - IP 1 9 9 am a 7.1 �•` -'rsVa 9 pn ..\I e 1c ♦1 s, s rs, A rn :\ A of ' , 'tS/ 7.2 DA(C)2"'(0) , •\ < - TA( 0• ♦0 i ' 8 27.1 1.7A(c) -'� d3 ( �, - a*- 6 0 0 ' r0' TS , aap *: p� ,�a� b ,'36.6 6 91 p€36.7 SA_ e2 ao` 1.329 A1q •Pa 3D � � pn OA c 0 a s d, �( --' 1� FOR PCL NO. Fbiy� ` 36.6 11 7- O' SEE SEC. NO. " 2�J1 MATCHUNE _ W 7S yF MATCH UNE g. r p $ O N 306 592 .,�• t.3Kq �t� d � 0 b. K TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SECTION NO NOTICE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © E vwO MAW%MNOE.ALTERAnC*1. SALE OR61* Real Property Tax SeMce Agency Y "` MLLACE OF 111 111 Oi6rRi9uT1ON OFANT FORTM OF THECb9nty C*~ Ft*"rhmd. N Y 11W1 M 13e SUFFOLK MTY OO,TN(IMPIS PR0111&iE0 -dCIilE 91 FEET.M � A --"" �wM r, Fee: $ Filed By: Assignment No APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS AREA VARIANCE House No..4A'02 Street Wb&"jV Q Hamlet CUTC QGfJ.E SCTM 1000 Section_Z// Block_Z4_Lot(s) Lot Size 1. 51 A Zone e -4Q I (WE) APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED PFC /a, 201-1 BASED ON SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATEDI`i Applicant(s)/Owner(s): /1 C -.M l,� eg"91. 01-f- "P,&C.4v7E Mailing Address: ,1-71 CAMEO M&4 Zl"_LML�%J�. /V. y Z/74f? Telephone: Fax: Email: NOTE: In addition to the above, please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney, agent, architect, builder, contract vendee, etc. and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative: Hl C",LCZ .4 r X Owner( )Other: Address: ,Q/ APIV6,0745 AMC &/I%MMA2 N• y Telephone:/ 727- 270 Fax: Ii1 A1,05 Emai1:M&/MAC.<2Ia !/"Iz"0N. NET Please check to specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to, from the above names: ( ) Applicant/Owner(s), (Authorized Representative, ( ) Other Name/ Address below: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED fJ_�; , ZOO ?and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED G' FOR: Q4 Building Permit () Certificate of Occupancy () Pre -Certificate of Occupancy () Change of Use ( ) Permit for As -Built Construction () Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article, Section, Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code.) , Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: ( ) A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ( ) A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law- Section 280-A. ( ) Interpretation of the Town Code, Article Section () Reversal or Other A prior appeal ( ) has, 06has not been made at any time with respect to this property, UNDER Appeal No(s). Year(s). . (Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our office for assistance) P/ Name of Owner: �VIC'yMW.T O'AR QOWV ZBA File# REASONS FOR APPEAL (Please be specific, additional sheets may be used with preparer's L�§14rfab signature notarized): ee c g'`v i li p o ce ' T ri�JS'�NFtone4rby 1.le c e t no e r uce m the C RA R of the neighbor or a detriment properties if granted, because: 7�1,����Jp�,Q,Q�,f%/17S'.G�4��D .,�CT�,�•�?Py4�'%S 7V PVX1P77A16, J7;rW7 XZ WOvLa �jNW..4W CA0- IW--- A-1'*jFT/G O�yoU� `N�' 1✓AL045r �r4aT RD 4Z� E�,4 CNAN 0 O 7710 IIAI&VOWPIOOP J� 2. The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: V,5 CQAJf;f( U�f'if��%'Oii% OF //Orox,-e TO 9WZI Pro 0/',f.,Pi3'L//V,53 L1I..E�n./Crl'o•��J''/rvh 1,VT-0 2WE Z07"Y JW725,oeN r`QSq�Zo/D �aE'iu o /,V^0 : oN CLti✓17V.4S' 4? &91--%V 7014 cel Y��-PZPI''4&& oys � vs ubb��i r/S �����co��cP,�.0�v.0 D/J�//1rx�✓ C 45 xA, 3. The/afioNuttt �freltefreque iAP,& s�ant�la bec :WLy �, c1' �r � fihi°NC7 �0 Ll �l�- ��oi1/s O/'� 1`(��a�iPAP.IVY- 4. The variance will NOT �an d r e c or unpact on the p sica or environmental conditions neighborhood or district because: w/Lt WFr44Y✓A.r OW W,5 /moo&TY A'an , W,,,U ;rMe F�rp4y-S'0,v AFC: NeLl- d,C ;W,6 AW,0i 7PA19 5. Has the alleged difficulty been self created? 04 Yes, or { } No; -4s W� //1PiPo�, 17;7.GV,'WW ,4N,v PZO VIA,& 14 lee,45 CrJHMVo6Le- �ixh � �cel '� VWS; Are ere any ovenants estricttons concerning this land? X No { } Yes (please furnish a copy) This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent (Agent must submit written Authorization from Owner) Swoto before me this day Of 20 . Notary Public CM �� u, �o i seg► York in Suffolk Counter .. luly 28, REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION 1. The applicant's house location is situated is a triangle of the lot which presently encroaches on the front yard and bulkhead setbacks. The porch extensions and additions will have minimal impact on the neighborhood A majority of the construction will be done within the existing building footprint. The lot is partially on a peninsula with minimum close exposure to adjacent lots. 2. The preexisting house is presently in non-conformance with the bulkhead and front yard setbacks. The contours and existing setbacks limits how the house can be added to. The additions cannot be constructed without the variances. 3. The variances requested is not substantial The front yard setback is presently 35.2' and the proposal is for a closed porch to be setback 31' The bulkhead setback is presently 67.2' and the proposed closed porch/ garage additions would be set back 54. The proposed additions represents a 3.5% increase to the present lot coverage. 4. The proposed project will have no impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant will construct a new septic system and build drywells to accommodate storm water roof runoff and the discharge from the outdoor shower. The existing house is presently connected to the public water supply. 5. The difficulty has been self created because the setbacks have existed since 1974 when the house was constructed. 6. There are no covenants or restrictions concerning this land. r!/1/c1R)l/ r"0 t�rjCEV� /1 P7�'S' 03,P19 1),4Y Notary Pub �c ,I V de '� 0 � i d�✓ P1C,EiY�" 6 %� Qual�ifloed in S�'golk Count y <J cam mtssion Fxoires July 2.R. 2 _ �. APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed: H. New Construction Areas (New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): ,2 -sr4J-#IAIOR ) Dimensions of first floor extensio: Dimensions of new second floor: Dimensions of floor above seconc► i -,v-,,: ryvrvc Height (from finished ground to top of ridge):Nm.09W12Z� Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed? If yes, natural existing grade to first floor: provide height (above ground) measured from III. Proposed Construction Description (Alterations or Structural Changes) (Attach extra sheet if necessary). Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: L ' ,N/iqW4 ,01MA6 AM. UVI.V6 0/. ?BD,eiMs,2 ,B47�Ys 2,vn,r�,: ZAVRZAis, ' Numberof • • and Changes WITH Alterations:y /r / - IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage (from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: Proposed increase of building coverage: 7 Flo A-0- Square OSquare footage of your lot: O, .S4 Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: V. Purpose of New Construction: 7V jOEWM95 a6 oXJrriNG /y7z(/C2%wxS ANYAG4039 AW,0 /Ah'01 OX A9)Z 9/Zg54 V" ONdEGV -V hW,0Z1V1A/G Cd)JfW2-p- yO NOWt' AW -V /A/OiWIN 9 fMIZ AG AU40V.E. VI. Please describe the land contours (flat, slope %, heavily wooded, marsh area, etc.) on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement (s): �' f'PX�C �Y�L� ?N� .>� WF2! r�'�1AT�Y�LY �L.qT O�°�►/ I��YD . 7� ,�JCI,IJ'//V l� b1)= 177V MI ZME MIdW D>Mr O< 3%&5 PAD-1.41iV/NG ALF APAZYW wPPY Ort/ 2%A5�/ VVQ WEJ')''aAOE APA7D,1G //-1Z iia &=Lcr. 7Il25 &/.li LV—& 64.q� AP T�+,E i�tfN/ C1J f�rtA19�S UJB!/�' �X/�,Syl/.l�Q/V Please submit 8 sets of photos, labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction, and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 4/2012 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? Yes _No B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? No _Yes please explain on attached sheet. ^�OA64 IHVIM5 7D y7d,E �OlZCil� ' A�✓i� A4WP70,oV1' 1241-W CUr rp AM ov1A9,47,,=_ (2NI MPMOW Y .,V P��t?It'!��✓Z- F�tl,� P"o *"CJS C. 1.) Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? y,�5s 2.) Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application? y�S' 3.) Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? PARrIA LY 4.) If your pro erty contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction?Please confirm status of your inquirt or application with the Trustees:' o f,W,Ql► and if issued, please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? NQ E. Are there any atios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting?_Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above line. F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises?i/ /O _If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe: G. Please attach all pre -certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If any are lacking, please apply to the Building Department to either obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel? /V 0 If yes, please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. 1. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel��jj>�y�l�iL and the proposed use AW1-,*P ✓>r7Ji�L (ex: existing single family, proposed: same with garage, pool or other) /Z/16113 Authorized signature and Date FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall Southold, N.Y. PRE EXISTING CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No Z-20915 Date AUGUST 6, 1992 THIS CERTIFIES that the building ONE FAMILY DWELLING Location of Property 4302 WUNNEWETA ROAD CUTCHOGUE, N.Y. House No. Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 111 Block 14 Lot 3.0 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Requirements for a One Family Dwelling built Prior to: APRIL 9, 1957 pursuant to which CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY NUMBER Z-20915 dated AUGUST 6, 1992 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ONE FAMILY DWELLING * The certificate is issued to VERN ELDERD TRUST (owner) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL N/A UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. N/A PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED N/A *PLEASE SEE ATTACHED INSPECTION REPORT. Bf dig n e for Rev. 1/81 BUIT DI"..G DEP:..?T:•1ENT TO';yid OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. HOUSING CODs. INSPECTION REPORT Location 4302 Wunneveta Road Cutchogue, N.Y. knu.MDer & street) li•iunicipality) Subdivision Map No. Lot(s) Name of Owner(s) VERN ELDERD TRUST Occupancy ONE FAMILY VACANT, OWNER DECEASED (type) 0%-finer-zenan z ) Admitted by: JUDY JOHNSON Accompanied by: SAME Key available Suffolk Co. Tax No. 111-14-30 Source of request M.J. HEFTER, ATTY Date JULY 13, 1992 DWELLING: Type of construction FRAME -PART BRICK VENEER Ustories 1-1/2 Foundation MASONRY (BLOCK) Cellar xx Crawl space Total rooms, 1st. Fl 5 2nd. F1 3rd. Fl Bathroom(s) 4 Toilet room(s) Porch, type Deck, type Patio, type 2 -Raised a Breezeway Garage IN CELLAR Utility room -M-e •Brick Type Heat ELECTRIC Warm Air Hotwater Fireplace(s) 1 No. E:cits 3 Airconditioning Domestic hotwater x Type heater ELECTRIC Other ACCESSORY STP.UCTURES• Garage, type const. Storage, type const. Seri ming pool Guest, type const. Other VIOLATIONS: CHAPTER 45—N.Y. STATE UNIFORM FIRE PREVENTION & BUILDING CODE Remarks: BP #7454 -Co Z-6417 Inspected 'A Date of Insp. JULY 22, 1992 Time start 9:20 end 10:05 AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WHEN TO USE THIS FORM: This form must be completed by the applicant for any special use permit, site plan approval, use variance, area variance or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district OR within 500 feet of a farm operation located in an agricultural district. All applications requiring an agricultural data statement must be referred to -?he Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance with Section 239m and 239n of the General Municipal Law. 1. Name of Applicant:C Q p 2. Address of Applicant: 3. Name of Land Owner (if odid than Applicant): 4. Address of Land Owner: 5. Description of Proposed Project:.0a/ri%�� 6. Location of Property: road an Tax map number jQ3�JZ IN.bN/Y"rV� ClJTt/yd,U,t «�q- 3 0 7. Is the parcel within 500 feet of a farm operation? { } Yes No 8. Is this parcel actively farmed? { ) Yes X No 9. Name and addresses of any owners) of land within the agricultural district containing'active farm operations. Suffolk County TaxLotnumbers will be provided to you by the Zoning Board Staff, it is your responsibility to obtain the current names and mailing addresses from the Town Assessor's Office (765-1937) or from the Real Property Tax Office located in Riverhead. NAME and ADDRESS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (Please use the back of this page if there are additional property owners) Kir115, SignaTure of Applicant Date' Note: 1. The local Board will solicit comments from the owners of land identified above in order to consider the effect of the proposed action on their farm operation. Solicitations will be made by supplying a copy of this statement. 2. Comments returned to the local Board will be taken into consideration as part as the overall review of this application. 3. Copies of the completed Agricultural Data Statement shall be sent by applicant to the property owners identified above. The cost for mailing shall be paid by the Applicant at the time the application is submitted for review. A- 617.20 Appendix B Short Environmental Assessment Form Instructions for CompletinE Part I - Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part l - Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: Project Location (describe, and attaf�- aw 1 9cati ma 45M WUNN�b1/Erli /` -440, NaGV,E ON W 41,V IJ,*- wA XV O�N-p Brief Description of Proposed Action: fDy �� l�i� ,011 Nd/LrJ PO.It^,4� , ✓� cam'/�'`�.v.�1 z�,o ��4rI D •�lV� COVIJ�IJ �OI�Cf>1 • /Jf�,Oli'/Q�11 /�iCGU•t�,� CO�f�P;5 nJ r/ vN D� vv�N5w �x�n A0,9 �,, -4 121 VN I'�E�, ,e�,v 1%7 a L, U1✓,� ,+�Qap� � AO/o Mvr� A X/ Ifo 6�/t� �DI�2C� U24 iv �iy,€ (r,'yA/1AG,t ��d7'G'i9�BDV,� Aa//� Z CAIZ 1�40aN 0,417 -AMD 7 -fid rte 7'!4W 0 AUX �Lx4U �rl�zY NOS .rrJ 2 Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone :27-21,09 E -Ma' kk Address: 1V City/PO: State: Zi//p Code: V i/ 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, NO YES administrative rule, or regulation? If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or a prov - rc�VW6W r0WW&-0 reg . WSPZ",os 3.a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? % / ���acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on, adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑ Urban ❑ Rural (non -agriculture) ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial Residential (suburban) ❑ Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic ❑ Other (specify): ❑ Parkland Page] of 4 IT r 5. Is the proposed action, a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? NO YES N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? NO YES 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes, identify: NO YES 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? b. Are public transportation service(s) available at or near the site of the proposed action? c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? NO YES 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: NO YES X 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? If No, describe method for providing potable water: PR/W6_ WA2z;Z Ma"OZY NO YES 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: J2 mC aw�l�CY/ "of NO YES 12. a. Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register Historic Places? b. Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? NO YES 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency? b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: NO YES 14. Id ntify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: 14'Shoreline ❑ Forest ❑ Agricultural/grasslands ❑ Early mid -successional XWetland ❑ Urban ❑ Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? NO YES X 16. Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non -point sources? If Yes, a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? '(NO ❑ YES b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)?a If Yes, brieflydescribe: ❑ NO�'YES MO TiV 4 CCJM7Z 1V NO YES Y ti F Page 2 of 4 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids (e.g. retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)? If Yes, explain purpose and size: 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes, describe: X 20. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or NO YES completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AppGeatrt/sponsornarne:�%_ Date: Signature: Part 2 -Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part l and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept "Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" Page 3 of 4 No, or Moderate ¢ small to large r:: r r impact impact may occur may occur I. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? x 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area (CEA)? x 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit, biking or walkway? X 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? ` JC 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a. public / private water supplies? +, n X b. public / private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic, archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? JC 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources (e.g., wetlands, waterbodies, groundwater, air quality, flora and fauna)? x Page 3 of 4 Part 3 - Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and cumulative impacts. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Date Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 No, or Moderate _ small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion, flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? X Part 3 - Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered "moderate to large impact may occur", or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact, please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail, identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and cumulative impacts. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above, and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Date Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 AUTHORIZATION (Where the Applicant is not the Owner) I, N i C, ()-I �s �)Cdlcqi(-, residing at (print property Owners name) 3-3) CamZo N"\� (mailing address) do hereby authorize_ &&11.1416 L & /Cl/V//% ,/C' (Agent) to apply for variance(s) on my behalf from the Southold Zoning Bo d of Appeals. (Owner's Signature) R i Chol ai NIC YIt (Print Owners Name) AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's_Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. v YOUR NAME : &Z C'/umz A lfol?" &4 (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Variance X Change of Zone Approval of Plat Other (activity) Building Permit Trustee Permit Coastal Erosion Mooring Planning Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicant/agent/representative) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply) : A) the owner of greater that 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation) B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non -corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation) C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or D) the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this 21 day ofh 20�(� Signature MA:2Q� Print Name &1 rAi4j51_ A e1iMCe APPLICANT/OWNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and emnlovees. The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. yy�� YOUR NAME : A11 0 1-16 LI Q9 RA4W I 2 (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Variance Change of Zone Approval of Plat Other (activity) Building Permit__ Trustee Permit Coastal Erosion Mooring Planning Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO __>�— If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicant/agent/representative) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply) : A) the owner of greater that 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation) B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non -corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation) C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or D) the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this day of0 Signature e j Print Name Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. if an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# /// ---14 - The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board E Planning Dept. 0 Building Dept. ® Board of Trustees Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) 0 (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: 0 Nature and extent of action: Location of action: 430s- lei U 1VNy-5;yS7;9 PONA.t CUJ`C/iIDG ,L Site acreage: "5-D� x"04 S�. fi /, /sq, '4 Present land use: Present zoning classification: R— 40 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: HI40, 4 j15L .4..�i/y% L'JG (b) Mailing address: -?Z/ R1 VA6?,f'// ,O el ULC (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( ) !3/ ZZ Z- 203 (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No 21 If yes, which state or federal agency? DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. D4Yes F] No [:] (Not Applicable - please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria Yes E No IBJ (Not Applicable — please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Yes M No 0 (Not Applicable — please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria Yes 0 No R (Not Applicable — please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria KZ Yes 0 No E (Not Applicable —please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes E No ® (Not Applicable —please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. See Section III — Policies Pages; 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ NoFA (Not Applicable — please explain) VZ/-ivdf,'�o �Y Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ® (Not Applicable — please explain) PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ YeD No R (Not Applicable — please explain) G Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water -dependent uses and promote siting of new water -dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ® (Not Applicable — please explain I Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No R Not Applicable — please explain r Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable — please explain z�.VC7_ / -ya_ /5f, Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable — please explain NICHOLAS AND BARBARA PALLANTE DATE TAKEN; 12118/13 LOCATION: NW CORNER LOOKING NE Mown - I y1f 'i4v v 4 1V, Now JIII VI,/ �' -1, I A ia ZIP Nk- NICHOLAS AND BARBARA PALLANTE DATE TAKENA 2118113 LOCATION: SW CORNER LOOKING NORTO `tel �'�•- �� �... 1. �.' ,res;;• +a X�i