The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-96.-1-19.1 (9) � � MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOAR,D MEMBERS _``�aF so�ry P.O. Box 1179 DONALD J.WILCENSHI h�`� ��O Southold, NY 11971 Chair � � OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY � � �Q 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III �l (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOK y�'QU�� Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southol dtownny.gov PLANNING BOAR.D OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector From: Heather M. Lanza, AICP, Planning Director �� Date: October 20, 2014 Re: Planning Department Report T-Mobile Northeast at Junge SCTM#1000-96.-1-19.1 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue As an addendum to the attached SPUD, the Planning Department has conducted a review of the proposed modifications pursuant to §280-74 B.(2), and has received a report from our Wireless Technical Consultant, Cityscape, Inc. (see attached report). We have the following recommendations for this application: 1. The proposed T-Mobile modifications and up-grades are in compliance with the General Requirements of§280-70, therefore, we recommend a Building Permit be issued for this application in accordance with the Structural Analysis Report, dated February 14, 2014, and the FCC RF Compliance Assessment and Report, dated August 11, 2014. 2. The Building Permit must state the following: "All feed lines shall be installed inside the monopole structure as approved". Thank you for your cooperation. � ■ ��■ �l�./� ` o O � ` � � �L. ` 4�,� �P� Consultants, Inc. .,.� �..A�,� �; ;� �� .� `, , �,'�$ i ' ��; t ;��,_. i :� 1 f. . � �_. ,i� ' u � s t __.__._ i October 10, 2014 �� , � �� ,. _ �.., .:___...:___� � Ms. Heather M. Lanza,AICP Planning Director Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 Southold, New York 11971 RE: T-Mobile Applications - SCTM#1000-96.1-19.1 and SCTM#1000-75.5-14.1 Dear Heather, Enclosed please find five (5) copies each of CiryScape's review and analysis submitted bv T-Mobile for the above referenced applicarions. Please let us know if you have any quesrions or comments regarding the enclosed analysis. Sincerely, Kay Miles Enclosures 7050 W. Palmetto Park Road#15-652• Boca Raton, FL 33433-3483 Tel:877-438-2851 • Fax: 877-220-4593 � � � �vJ�-f= , `�r3 �`� t�-CC State of New Y�k o � � Telecommunications Site Review Consultants, inc. Upgrade with Tower Modifications 7050 W.Palmetto Paric Road#15-652 Boca Raton,Florida 33433 Te1:877-438-2851 Fax:877-220-4593 October 9,2014 Heather M. Lanza,AICP -� =�' Planning Director Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 '' O C� 1 4 '1`' Southold,New York 11971 RE: T-Mobile Northeast: LI-13-544-A �-u � SCTM : 1000-96.1-191 21855 County Road 48 � Dear Ms. Lanza, At your reyuest, on behalf of the Town of Southold, New York ("Town"), CityScape Consultants, Inc. ("CityScape") in its capacity as telecommunications consultant for the Town, has considered the merits of an application submitted by T-Mobile Northeast, LLC ("Applicant"), to make antennas and electronic equipment modifications to an existing monopole-type support structure, see E�ibit A. The purpose of the proposed modifications is to allow T-Mobile Wireless to continue implementation of its fourth generation (4G) upgrades and new high speed wireless broadband service which will complement their existing cellular phone service in the Town of Southold. This application is one of many similar type proposed changes intended to provide new advanced 4G LTE (Long Term Evolution) service into the general subject area. This new technology and proposed antenna upgrade is for high speed wireless broadband implementation. The existing subject tower has a total elevation of one hundred eight(108) feet with antennas for MetroPCS mounted above tower top at one hundred eleven (l 11) feet. The Applicant's subject antennas are mounted at the ninety (90) foot level; see figure 1. The subject facility is owned by Crown Castle and is located at 21855 Country Road 48 in Cutchogue; see figure 2. The Applicant plans to exchange and replace their internal electronic equipment inside an existing equipment cabinet within the Applicant's ground compound area, see frgure 3. The Applicant currently has twelve (12) existing antennas and proposes to remove and replace all with nine (9) new panel type antennas. According to part of the submittal, there are no other changes planned, however upon further research, it appears a new hybrid line will be required. The Applicant cunently has twelve (12) 0.875 inch feed lines and states the addition of one (1) new 1.625 inch feed line which appears to be a hybrid fiber line, along with a fiber distribution box. The Applicant does not plan to include any remote radio units (RRU's) in the proposed final antenna configuration; see frgure 4. CityScape has noted a few marginal inconsistencies within the submitted documentation. First, the location and key map shown on Page T-1 of the construction drawings indicates the location at Grifing Street and Main Road, one and one-half mile south of the actual location. Second, the construction drawings state the T-Mobile antennas are at ninety (90) feet, while the equipment tables in the submitted Structural Analysis Report state the antennas are at eighty-eight (88) feet which is within reason, yet the tower elevation drawings within the structural analysis have the antennas at the seventy-eight (?8) foot level, as shown in figure 1. Regardless of the inconsistencies reported within each document, CityScape does not find either to be a concern since there are sufficient safety margins in the design. T-Mobile Northeast:LI-13-�A � ��H� SCTM: 1000-96.1-19.1 o O � Town of southold,New York Consultants, Inc. October 9,2014 Page 2 Telecommunications Site Review New York Antenna Upgrade There have been numerous modifications to this tower and facility over the years. All known personal service providers licensed in the New York City MSA are currently mounted on this structure. Previously, both AT&T Wireless and SprintPCS have made their 4G upgrades and now T-Mobile will also provide new 4G advanced services in the area. Verizon will likely follow with upgrades. The last installation and upgrade at the facility was for Sprint which required retrofit and modification upgrades to the tower. The tower upgrades were completed and will allow for the proposed T-Mobile modifications, and will likely allow for future upgrades by Verizon. The Applicant submitted a Structural Analysis Report dated February 14, 2014 which confirms the structure is sufficient to support the proposed antenna modifications. The new tower rating will be 88.6% out of an allowable 105%, see figure 5. Prior to the T-Mobile modifications, the tower rating was 92.8%and the updated structural reflects an overall reduction in tower loading. The Town requires monopoles as the preferred support structure, as a compromise to limit visual impact. Monopoles are designed for feed lines to be internally mounted to reduce visual impact. The Applicant has proposed to install the new hybrid cable outside the existing monopole. According to the submittals, there are currently fourteen (14) lines and one (1)proposed line outside the monopole, see fagure 6. Apparently the fourteen (14) current lines belong to MetroPCS and should not have been approved. The feed lines for MetroPCS, at the first opportunity, should be relocated inside the monopole and the nroposed new hvbrid line for T-Mobile should not be approved. The Applicant submitted an Antenna Site FCC RF Compliance Assessment and Report dated August l l, 2014, with supplied calculations to assure compliance with all FCC standards regarding human exposure to Radio Frequency energy; see figure 7. The Applicant's spectrum will operate in various spectrum ranges, however should not be an interference concern to the Town's public safety communications. All designs and plans for the proposed new facilities were developed according to accepted practices of RF propagation engineering and the persons completing all work are sufficiently qualified within their disciplines. The Applicant has provided sufficient documentation in order to qualify under the new Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 ("The Act"). To meet those qualifications the tower cannot be increased in height or girth by more than 10%or 20 feet, whichever greater, nor can the Applicant require ground excavation outside the existing ground compound. CityScape confirms that the application is qualified under The Act and shall be processed and approved through streamlined processing. Therefore, CityScape recommends the above referenced application be approved and the Town should require the Applicant install the proposed new feed line inside the monopole. Respectfully submitted, ,�- _ ;� , , ` �� -j - - �r � _ . _� {✓„'' �� _.__. Richard L. Edwards FCC Licensed PCIA Certified CityScape Consultants, Inc. T-Mobile Northeast:LI-13-�A � ��M SCTM: 1000-96.1-19.1 o P � Town of southold,lvew York Consuttants, (nc. October 9,2014 Page 3 Telecommunications Site Review New York Antenna Upgrade ,a.�. ; _ � _ � 6 � • I e Q �s� 0 0 $ - � � � � g � � � - - ;� � � � I� � � � � � � � 6 - ., - � � � ne* + � f � n � , � F � s.� � '�i � � e c o F, Fi ��• DESICNED APPl1FtTENANCE LQADING TIPE ELEYA710M T/PE ELEYATqN rnMas�v�r.�wea. +a e.o�wr..�e..w. n O1:lp�lIWS�TIrWMi4� !v .O�AIiJU(TrYlAPM 77 17S�MOfFCENt11rIW�qM �a 11a��Ngfl �e +YwYw�1��R �� 40�AIBAtCCrl�anPw T� �YwD�rF16r� 1R �M17t�Illsr� tD 1 �74L70�iC►w�1IWf eC f4H7t�I1W� 7! � � F � � fl'3��Yw�N `R Ll[[YO6W f0 � a ;�. ,7a 6►A•1T1�ia�I�M�p tR (7pNq{� �p z er��swotnr rw eb+ rm� nowrava� n g w.�saotr.:�rnAr tm nraoaeae m 6 �Foa� �� crrmn-�aa �a # raaHm� +� tn�aooaa.a �o rtfiaw� •m omras.nv m Mtrr tQ.' 06��IW A /4ld�IISR 9� �! - 0�./'II A y. '7ii1 lMMSp�U fm rt�71�f�Y1�q'� 7L _ i - rM11II'1�81MO�rlru� 0! �fW,��l A !� ' i+9! � �i�`Iliw'M �0 i:. L - CRGf0.M M1171�iM�w IMu� ! IHM 10C A 1�f � CRCOSCA M1171 iN p�y WR� �R11� 7D � R�N$ w0 [RCrOCd1�M 21 iM CRs'IYr� � �IRM�Yi6 T� � _ � C $ q� MINIM6 A r° t, ces�ec«r�r sa�w rrw a ��ws ±o w - � � °'+� �wr r.f �v�uwv+ r .rr...w�. m �ar.��iwv+ s �-rwor. m �6vf kRriV IWI • �,Ay��p� A � - TinY�s�I��A � ra/� TJ ' ' ,•o+ s.xsria.rsn � au+rr.wA� �m R � • � tr:m ran � r.wpaq �o .irf o►.�ew • �o�ns 7¢ a L". '�. l�f• RIC�iDM�t#ra7�Mor/r1� � � - a �ii u� MATERfAI STRENGTH � e ',� a m ORADE FY Fr ORADE iy Fu 8 8 e �ssaa �r �r �mr er mr ' =+'s wsrac mw �r � � e � TOYVER DESIGN NOTES a1 t � E k e }.ta,�rcr n wueee m eura�we�,rrer.roa. I �' p F .� ' � � 3.tEMv 6em�pee ftr a 1�CWatc 01wt�0�a¢a�e�Ue T6R-:22-G�. y e J6 � i � � a.ie.v ts ai�aesqnea�or s so mm�e�tc.ra.e+u 7s n ioe_�ce�s m�m haEOS!hl�ttAlta'�R!INl�lY 5-De�ec�v�s se a»ea�m�i W��pdf wMO. 6.7WRx BWCOre GYs t. 7.7tPc�pmt�t Ca�Oary t�GeII MHpM a►0.�R B.T6WE(iRA7NG:BB.6\ Figure 1. Tower Elevation T-Mobile Northeast:LI-13-�A � ■��■�— SCTM: 1000-96.1-191 o O � Town of Southold,New York Consultants, It1C. October 9,2014 Page 4 Telecommunications Site Review New York Antenna Upgrade ..,� •'- DeLatne Str�etAtlu U5/1�2009 . � � � . . R�pp c. �: �pR O� ¢�� O�a < � . . � �Rlar'F <N P� . . 4� . �XW ` . O� �o J.., o N . PP��` P� ��! � 1P±''•• GQ",. C�� •rs�r�wnn�ry ��-LY � �; �t.�� ,, rL �ro i 0 ^y'��a c'�w �k sQ"�� `'�' bo�° 'yo d ,�Fr,� �2q . � Fo OQ 9 � v pS�y, >� ana�Ks�auon . �t� L� . . c�<T� �� ..� � .. OR' 'aq� oP' �Y �� °@ � e�'�` H��S ��P� � �. C�"i Data use subject ro license. } � �DeLortne_DeLorme SVeetAtlas USA�2009. }� 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 www.delorme.com � MN(13 8°W) Data Zoom 14-0 Figure 2. Site Locatioo T-Mobile Northeast: LI-13-�A ■ ■��■�M SCTM: 1000-96.1-19.1 o O � Town of Southold,New York Consultants, IIIC. October 9,2014 Page 5 Telecommunications Site Review New York Antenna Upgrade EXISTING GPS UNIT TO RFMAIN EXfSTING 1 MOBfLE EQUIPMENT CABWET SET ATOP CONCRETE PAD TO REMAIN EXISTING T-M081LE RBS3106 EQUiPMENT CABINET ti �` � EIEVATED CABLE SUPPORT BY OTHERS EXISTING EQUIPMf:NT SHELTER BY UTf iERS r � r $',�ei:�£`S.+:TiC Y,,f� e .`�21�ii3„,�t'. `i`~ � , � s� � �� f►�. O•_O" A Figure 3. Weatherproof Ground Cabinets T-Mobile Northeast:LI-13-S�A � � SCTM: 1000-96.1-19.1 a Q � Town of Southold,New York October 9,2ota Consultants, Inc. Page 6 Telecommunications Site Review New York Antenna Upgrade .Q 0 (12) EXISTING T—MOBILE ANTENNAS TO BE ~ RE�IQVED AND ttEPlACEO Wti'M (B) I�R21 � ,o ANT�Nl+�AS (TYP. O (2) P�it 3�CTO�i). REM4VE 7MAs AS R�QUIRED. {3) Ta Rf.1�ARdN. TYP. t PER S£CT4R . EXISTING 110'-0" MONOPOLE BY OTHERS �3t f��: _ _ ti �� , ' � �:�, � . � / 'A TN � Figure 4. Final Antenna Configuration T-MobileNortheast:LI-13�A ■ ■■N��N SCTM: 1000-961-19.1 G� o O � Town of Southold,New York Consultants, 111C. October 9,2014 Page 7 Telecommunicatians Site Review New York Antenna Upgrade PAUL J. F(�RI� AND COMPANY 5 T R I1 C 1 �1 R rt L E N C"7 I N [ f R 5 ::D��fiaKl9rml • 5.,��pp • �umlru� Obiu a3)IS•170e Date: Feb►uery 14,2014 Marienne Dunct Paul J Ford md Compa�►y Crown CaaUe 25D E,8rnad Street,Suioe BDO 3530 Toringdon Way,SuNe 300 Cdumbus,OH 43215 Charlode,NC z827Y 81s.221,6679 704,405 8580 cmccsMey�pjfweb,com 3uhJacL• Buvcturel Analysis Rrport Cerrier Desiynafiwr: T-lNo�b�Cod.ocato Catrlsr S!!o Numbar U13540 Carrlsr Sib Mame: NA Crown CasUe Desigriatlon: Crowrn CasUe BU Num6er. 606579 Crown Caetla 6its ll�me: NY CUTCHOGUE 958280 Cmwn Castla JDE Job Number 259690 Crown Castla Work Order Numbvr. 711fi62 Crown Castl�Applicallon NumWr: 218268 Rev,2 Fnpinserlrrg F1rm OeslgnaHor+: Paul J Fad and Company Pro1ec1 Numper. 3751 a�0293 S!N Da/s: 21855 COUNTRY R0,CIJTCHOOUE,Sutfolk Counfy,NY Letkude i7•f'16.57",LonplWde-M°29'30.29•' 100 Foof-Monopole Tower with B.S Foot Extension pear AAarianne dunet, i'aul J Faud and Comparry�s Pleased Oo subm�fhis"Struetural Anatysfs Repoh'lo de6ermine the shruch�ral §�Eagriry ot ths above menUoned tower. 7Ris anaiyals has beon pertormed in acoordinoe with the Cronvn Castle Strucfura!'Slalement ot Work'and Ihe terms of Crown Caatlo Purchaso Ord�NumOer 61T238,In accordsnce ww�h eppicalion 2lb2B8,revislon 2, Tho Durpoae of Cte analyele�do determme acceptablMly of Me l�wer sireae kwel. Baeed on our enalyeis we have determined tlie Eower stresa level for[he atructue and toundatlan,under the Fola.vinp bad cese,to be: LCT:Existinp+Rosarvod�Propaaed Equipmont Sufficknt Cap�city Nqe:S��Ta6k 1 and iebM D Mt„e prOpaecd and misW�qfesn�ad Ioad�tg.rmreoiyek. The structural anaiysle wae peAormeA fa 1fi1s Iower In acoordance wIM ihe requlremerua of the ANS UTIA-222- G�2005 StanderC,'Strudural Standaud fix M1ama Supporti�p StrucEures and AM�nas,with ANSUTIA-222-Cr 1-200T anA I4NS1lTIA-222-G-2-200H Addanda uairg a 3-eeoond guet wlnd epeed of 120 rnph wfM�no ice,50 mpn wIM 0.75 inch ioe thickrress nnd 8D mph under aervice loada,expoaure cahipory C wilh EopoprapFac catepary 7 and crest haiflht of 0 feeL 144 moOiRcaGans and equlpment proposed"n thie report aha11 be IrnlaMed tn accordarxe with the referencad diawings for the detertnined availab�e atruchxal capacity to be ettecNve. We et Peul J Ford and Company appwaciala Ihe opporUnity oi piovidng our coiNkwing protessfonal sorvlces lo you and Crovm Castle. If you have any puestione or need hxther es�a any dhor proJaGs p�Baee 9iva us e�a��. :��°K NFy,}O'� ReeQedfuYy submittad by: � �� y \e�To�s-er Rating * �'� corny td►ocar�,ey,ei � a-ill be 88.6Q/o out of � �` Strucprcal Dealgner a maumum of lOS�ib � � InXTo�re�Rcqort-vcrswn 8,4., r �t � �', � �J e-�- • ._./OZ(��Y Figure 5. Structural Rating h st:LI-13-S�A � ��p T-M�bile N�rt ea SCTM: 1000-96.1-19.1 a � � Town of Southold,New York C011SUI�at1tS, IIIC. October 9,2014 Page 8 Telecommunications Site Review New York Antenna Upgrade aK+ufs*tr�r awm n�va•�e io R►� !JI'W 7D R 1194 !2)�T3 10 R �� i+� an�.uoe �d . � rf� � p ,,�-m,�R� ,' `' �` `��;�:� � , � � � ; -_� �`- �� . � �. � ��,�p n R�a � fi � �i • � e{� ° 4 1� � t � �� 1 \ j � ��r ee rt�a. � �e �� f !}+�4�i��ft��R LE$ ' ,J \ �`.�. .� - "' � t �//y��,�g \� / ti�f 1A'Po� lbFl \ * 1 i � � �, �. �P4ptlS�Al'ti�'Illlc S�10111tI 1�inside the monc�+nle !00 Ft Alar�po�w✓8.5 Ft Ext�nsior►Tower Sbuc9htraf An�ysis Project l�n�37514U293,a4p�icatiovt 2t62&6, Revis�r�2 Figure 6. Feed Line Installation T-Mobile Northeast:LI-13�A � �H�� SCTM: 1000-96.1-19.1 a O � Town of Southold,New York - October 9,2oia Consultants, Inc. Page 9 Telecommunications Site Review New York Antenna Upgrade PINNAC�E TE�EGOM GROUp Pr�c�sianai and Tecfinicaf S�erv�s ANTENNA SITE FCC RF C011�pLIANCE ASSESSMEIVT ANd REpORT T�MOb1�E NORTIIEAST LLC SITE LI1354-4A 21855 Counry Road 48 CuTcNoc�uE, NY Auc�vsT 11, 2014 �-� RtdCrEd.�IE A\ENUE ' $UITE 2�9 • CEdaR KwoQs, � �� • �-�5�-�� Figure 7. Human Exposure Analysis T-Mobile Northeast:LI-13-S�A ��N� SCTM: 1000-96.1-191 a 0 � Town of Southold,New York October 9,2014 Consultants, If1C. Page 10 Telecommunications Site Review New York Antenna Upgrade .ay� F '-�'yr`i,^�u�e"g.. ,� ��i �� ,h�� .�� :y��,�, q.i F �� p r ��s�� 4 � ��''�"�3k c �ui�a� � ��r l�ng� �,�r � ' . ' � �� u�� `�"�". �v f ��y�"� ��t :�� `"�C��'�� u ��, � �� r� � � � �'�., y�.��°�,�'��sk��§ r� � :��}'��.��' .�� r�z€`` � ., �`�3Y��T� m�i[�4��' �3� tF J `S3J'z`%Sp 5T-��^`'�� °'� . � ' fia �5 ��s��'�� t , �' �" �� . � �* � � .d`��+',5�5�'�-�' �� I �� z��F��eE� r:�'�f,` �r�. 3 3 � X W "'� �� F . y LT S' - 't�i S �6 � : � � u:'��J �� ,� t�� . "i 'i K�''k,�}t �tsr'r3`v`� .1� . �� . . �#+.'.. �,, i P�� i }�.� - s'v @3 s.* � � ��'��*�r4 �p��t�'��p� '�a� �� ,,,, � r _ :.�, s �" �� '""�� c � S �''�� " °�� k��a�� s'`�''�£�.+,x.� { �r e s�, , �t' ?� ,r�': �`�?.,�'�� f i� �K � i C �`i� 5 �'', e-•* � ��k��7�,'a�-°�'��` ��"'� �,t �'�� Y �-� � ��`��" � �� Y �, :t `' �� ` �v x* L. y' . _ , t� ;. +��,,�'�� : a�,y +, 5tr ¢k f " � } � # � Exhibit A. Subject Facility � � MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOAR,D MEMBERS ��OF SDU�'yO P.O. Box 1179 DONALD J.WILCENSKI �� l� Southold, NY 11971 Chair � � OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS N �r Town Hall Annex PIERCE R.AFFERTY � • �� 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III �� (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR CQU�,,� Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtownuy.gov � PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 19, 2014 Mr. Richard L. Edwards d/b/a CityScape Consultants, Inc. 7050 Palmetto Park-Road Boca Raton, FL 33433 Re: Consulting Services for T-Mobile NE at Junge Located at 21855 CR 48, Cutchogue, NY 11935 SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1 Zoning District: R-80 Dear Mr. Edwards: The Planning Board has authorized your scope of services in connection with the above. This letter will authorize you to proceed with the consulting work as outlined in the Agreement. � Enclosed is the approved Purchase Order#27132, $4,000.00, with amount not to be exceeded. Any work beyond this amount must be authorized in writing prior to being started. Also enclosed for your convenience is a Southold Town Voucher Form for your use with each invoice submitted to this department. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at 631/765-1938 befinreen 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Sincerely, �~c�`r"��tµt��°� Brian Cummings V Planner Encls. • R ! ! �� c� 74 EAST AVENUE,GLE1v COVE,NY 11542 TELEPHONE 516.972.6431 ♦ WAYNE.SMITH@CIVILSOLUTIONSNE.COM September 12, 2014 BY HAND ;J� (L j 7 �� ,;�� (�W��'� ; _ � .�. ; , � � �� a� "'� SEP 1 2 201� �:-�� Town of Southold a � � � Planning Department � ' ` ;,;u+;;a;�_;�,.;r,'"�. Town Hall ` ` �Iann�r�G��d �._.�:�_.._._:._.m.,___....._.. ._...._.� ....� Southold, NY 11971 RE: Application to the Department of Building Department for the Wireless Telecommunications Facility at 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY 11935; Section: 096; Block: 1; Lot: 19.1 (LI13544A) Dear Sir or Madam, As authorized representatives for T-Mobile Northeast, LLC ("T-Mobile") we submit five (5) copies of the following documents in support of the Building Permit Application submitted today to the Southold Building Department. An electronic copy was sent via email to Mr. Brian Cummings on September 10, 2014 at 6:30 PM 1. Drawings and site photos by William F. Collins Architects. Five sets. 2. FCC Compliance Report by Pinnacle Telecom Group. Five sets. 3. Structural Assessments by Paul J. Ford and Company. Five sets. 4. Letter regarding the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 ("TRA"). Five copies. 5. Check payable to Town of Southold in the amount of$4,000 to establish an escrow fund for the Town's wireless consultant's review of this application. Very truly o rs, Wayne Smith � � ��, F i� � � i ��ii�' ' �t,� Submission Without a Cover Letter � -' ' - ''�� -SEP 1 5101�+ ��1 � s � S�ut��ai��;:� ;`,{...n__. � � � ��7� � //�v��j� L.�. 9 , Sender: G��'I _ _ Flannin Boarc _y_ � � � . �' �y � �'c�� Subj ect. o� I � S S �v�' �"-� / � � � t L1 � 3-sy y scTM#: 1000 - d 9� � a r — /q, l Date: q �Z / ( C� ( Comments: //�-r-i �/o``' � {�l?U�i � ��S�� I � � �0 l�1//��«��lo� ��'�� f �� . ___ _ _ _ � . PP�� I-1� ,+�T � P�c_ � ��'`� _�.ry___.- . - �� , , � � - ERNA(.. USE ONLY 1� -_ _m , , ,. T ., , FOR IN � � '��'j�`;'; �CT p 12014 ;';`: SITE P LA N USE D�TERM[NATI �1 . -�..�_�-� r 'tiu � n G �� D�!n�f P ;,.,_.._.., r . _ Initial Determination � � I�— I � I� : �.. Date Sent:�_ — . Date:____�--�--- � � � �Project Name: � Project Address: 2 f � Ma No.:1000-�_-_�-=�Zoning District: �-f Suffolk County Tax p j �- a.n- ' c �n^'c'.� Requesf�: 'C�-l o c.r�.�--�- . (Note: Copy of Building Permit App lication and suppor��ng documentation a&to proposed use or uses should be submitted.) _ . lnitiai Deterniination as to whether use is permitted: . . hether site plan is required:�� '"��'-�""""� ��a Initial Determ�na#ion as to w Signature of Building Inspector � P�anning Department(P.D.) Referral: - � D�te of Comment: ��_��-�— 1'.D. Da#e Reeeived: �___—_-- — , � � Comments: � Signa#ure of Planning Dept.�Staff Revi�wer Final �eterminafiion . Date: � J Decision: _ _ ..a. �,,..,�t,�rA nf Rftilclina In�nPct�r i� r`� � � - � ... �� '�i;, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD a� -� OC T 0 1 20?� i�'; BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKL1ST BUILnING DEPARTMENT � ..__�. .�. � Do you have or need the following,before applying? TOWN HALL � ' �" `` 4` � Board of Health SOUTHOLD,NY 11971 `'�'�� ' '''"�� -'_ �-- --� 4 sets of Building Plans TEL: (631) 765-1802 , P(anning Board approval FAX: (631)765-9502 ' Survey SoutholdTown.NorthFork.net PERMIT NO. Check Septic Form N.Y.S.D.E.C. ' Trustees C.O.Application Flood Permit Examined .20 Singie&Separate ' Storm-Water Assessment Forn� Contact: Approved 20 ' Mail to: � � �" l_�, rH i -tf>��,� Disapproved a/c�Q�� J �� D�cT,�� _Jc �isC ,� Expiration Phone: ��V��-�� ,Zo (s��9��-6y3� �/7� Building Inspector APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Date , 20 INSTRUCTIONS a. This application MUST be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 4 sets of plans,accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises,relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or ar'eas,and waterways. c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application,the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit shall be kept on the emises available for inspection throughout the work. e. No build shall be c�ccupie�l �X�lsed in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building lnspector issues a Certificate � f. Every bui ng , , ,t siw;a � pire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the issuance or ha� � ,i «�, �,;!,.,,�u�,�,��,,in 18 months from such date. If no zoning amendments or other regulations affe�t ng the property have been enacted in the interim,the Building Inspector may authorize, in writing,the extension of the permit for an addition six months. There�fter,a new permit shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREgy MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Sou�hold, Suffolk County,New York,and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or Regulations,for the construction of buildings,',additions, or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described. The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances,building code,housing code,and regulations,and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. _ T��d,/� . (Signature of applicant or name,if a corporation) 3SOa Svhr�se � �`'Da03 �rrax��ivcr ,(/' �� on��aili address of applicant) �17 j�; State whether applicant is owner, esse , agent, architect, engineer, general contractorlelectrician, lumber or bui p lder :�'u;��e of owner oi premises ' (As on the tax roll or latest deed) If applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer (Name and title of corporate officer) Builders License No. Plumbers License Na Electricians License No. Other Trade's License No. �3_�y y 1. Location of land on w�}ich pro osed work will be done: /j � / a� S Sr (%f� v h ' �-2/ (:( 1'`Gihp C House Number Stre Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 'C7 j fp Block � Lot ��, � � � Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot 2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of roposed co struction: a. Existing use and occupancy ,, t.f _ �1/l1/lZdil/�2, cJNS b. Intended use and occupancy ' S.vvy U 3. Nature of work(check which applicable): New Building Addition Alteration � Repair Removal Demolition Other Work (Description) 4. Estimated Cost Fee ' (To be paid on filing this application) 5. If dwelling, number of dwelling units Number of dwelling units on each floor If garage, number of cars 6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use. 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories 8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories 9. Size of lot: Front ' Rear Depth 10. Date of Purchase ' Name of Former Owner 11. Zone or use district in which premise$are situated '��y h � ��vs�–� � 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? YES NO �''� 13. Will lot be re-graded? YES NO �Will excess fill be removed from premises? YES NO 14. Names of Owner of premises ' Address Phone No. Name of Architect ' Address Phone No Name of Contractor Address Phone No. 15 a. Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES NO �--� * IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES & D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. b. Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? * YES NO * IF YES, D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16. Provide survey, to scale, with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 17. If elevation at any point on property iS at 10 feet or below, must provide topographical data on survey. 18. Are there any covenants and restrictions with respect to this property? * YES NO * IF YES, PROVIDE A COPY. . STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF U C — `� � � ��r'P-r�� being duly sworn,deposes and says that(s)he is the applicant (Name of indrvidual signing contract)above named, (S)He is the ('�QG� � G�`�'� � :��«<u��r,�g��li, ��rpvraie Officer, etc.) of said owner or owners,and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application; that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. Sworn to before me this �day of S 20� JEN�VIFER DONOHUE „ �' - tate ot Nwr ltq _ -� tary Public �No.otooe2�tooa Si nature licant fluslitie�d In Suifolk.County g Commiasion Ezpires 09/Ot/20�' �._. � � � �. � � � �; � � � � � �� .,� ��T � 1 2�?� �. , . Sourho; LTE Modernization ^��""i�" Site #LI-13-544-A Site Name: "Cutchogue" 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY 11935 W FC# 14-10707 � t , � ��., r�� , ' � 4�. �� ° �,. T P i. �Ey}..,u�,. ,',�� , � � � � �� , �� r I ,� . � - � �a $, t �d- , x£ r�� -�� .�_,'' 3 '. � � Y a 3 < hl�'�.�-r',�� 'a' -�Y3`>�. r �,J, �,� ' �� ;. ' � . = `4 � ,�,� t� � aa� �".+y`'4 "a�� 4� �' �i�"y� ��t;� �;;i`.,�`�',�Fc' x , �''' � ';. � �� s 14 �w;s � � i � ; � k 4 _".^�� /��r.j 1 �# �� `'3,�.,��w `�d �' '°��" � �-;"`,� ��f�f � ...ti`s t�� i t '� �`,�, ;��r ��.�'� �� r"'�-_'�.'.1 ,�, �.,�. x a � � ��a�� . . .. � � �,`� nr��,��.��,. ,,, � � i , � � � �� ;i� �"��,3+3�'p��ryeY�'i�"��Q ��4� � � . �e�k."� ��: ' Y �.`�$� �y.}`� .. � ; � } � � $ .� `Y i �' $ � � � f ��St�S.. ��.�^ �1# t, l t � ��`'��q� 81i � # � l' ' x. �, p� C{r" �y 'bus ;F`' Y`{- 'hH� 5 b` � � .i 8 �`t: L #p �� , `�y �^ _' �)t ~ �� r� y$ 4 . . �� . �t# . . �,� . . . . ' `�;��'�...�' .. ��A� . �. �. _ ; .-,..: , . ........ ,n. , e•_ . e,. -� . - � � � : �� 4 , , 'Rc.w � ' ^ � '..�R, � . 4. z �,�� x`w� $�.`� s. ... �" 3 $�":.`, A... `y � � i � � .1� ; > .,', � ' � �,. z _ y .-` s•.n' °,._;� ,y � +� �� I �# } r � ( � 4a I � t � F��.#` �.-LL f t J t � � , °T � � " ,} � �: *& . � ' F*? g ,.b<< � sv"i d . i, : � _ j @s ;s. �'F �� . . �" � � � ; ' � � � � � � b�a'�'" ' �'�. �' u..��.�*t,�. �. � �� t��a � A'=��-�^,��,�+e . ,t..f, �s��. � � p.�� '�`�'�' '� , � {� i s;: . $ � � �� , �. � � -ry; ; �� "' ~~�� , ��Y�: , _ � � _ . � ,, t;�� '°� t< � .�- � �� 3,,..�� r ;, � � 1 " � —,, ��, ,.— .� , � II � � �� .. � � �� I I I II i lIl I - � �� 6 � � p' I fi� .�� ..�,a � � �� ,� LTE Modernization Site #LI-13-544-A Site Name: "Cutchogue" 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY 11935 WFC# 14-10707 I , ,.,,, � ..�,,. s t a ��. ;� ��.� � �� ,,..�� t.�=� ,..4.,. .e t (�,��'' 3�:-'$+�'' k. � t ) Y��r�i��l�t4�t•�,�d�'"i�1��St51� �� " ' n�1Y41�!ii'i h d yl ��iI6��f�Ip,Pi h ri 'I� j � �� #: M f' � Y(i � e, �� s k � i�G;�� t�"��I'f 4 ��`��tw��{r��f 1I;�� i�i I , 1 �t 4 i4fic�; �E �� yu��''�Vu� ��il�i C� �� . `'.��, � E I! � ; : � � ��' r �`r''! I y I I I '��I�'� � . �! Y I i I�'I �...+�'+ � ��;��' � ....:�. { .;' . `.i : . _ . �.� $4�� ,,a:;:�.y �rk� � � � � t m a� � �i ��.t3yp.;, r � .. i p�� a ..�� " .'� �. � �.ti. . �' r � �. :�. ^�� , � .,,Y 2. . ^ �*S , �� w ��'� � ..� + ..+r�w, ... ,x�.,; ,- , y , .^ � w ,, r�� . � x �^�C` ;�. „ : ky fi�� '�'�.. r � t� ��$ .. � L��.. :. 1 - <��1 �� . �ro y 1 ! }��f �.�. ��{"k;�:.. � .. #' �� }�� s.. i Z aa� �' �� a �� ;� �,} , � 'r�J � * h � 'n , �� _ � � � ' �._wi�� '� � � i � .x _ `�' � , ` ' � _ ,� � a �, . � ..,�� : a �. ..�.. .�. T-Mobile Northeast LLC, a subsidiary of T-Mobile USA, Inc. 3500 Sunrise Highway, Suite D203 __ __- -- __. ._..__ ___.__ L'sceat.Riuex,-D1Y11739____._ _. . Attn.: Dan Gustafeni ^ Date: September 12, 2014 BY HAND Town of Southold Attn: Building Department 53095 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 Dear Sir or Madam: T-Mobile submitted an application requesting approval to make modifications to the existing telecommunications facility located at 21855 Country Road 48, Cutchogue, NY Section: 096; Block: l; Lot 19., in Town of Southold for your approval. T-Mobile site ID: LI13-544A. As you may know, in February of 2012,the Congress on the United States passed the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012("TRA")(Pub. Law No. 112-96, 126 Stat 156).The TRA contains key provisions that directly affect this application. Specifical(y, Section 6409(a)of the TRA mandates the grant of requests to place certain collocations and make certain technology upgrades to existing wireless facilities. Under its terms, state and local governments"may not deny, and shall approve, any eligible _ facilities reguest for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station." An Eligible Facilities Request is any request to modify an existing tower or base station that involves "collocations of new transmission equipment"as well as"removal"and"replacement"of transmission equipment. Section 6409(a)(2)(A)-(C). As this application fully conforms to the requirements of the TRA, we are requesting immediate approval of this application. T-Mobile is working to respond to unprecedented customer demand for dependable wireless communication services. To meet this demand,T-Mobile is constantly improving its coverage areas and expanding its network capacity to handle the customer calls and a growing use of data. These upgrades are designed to enhance the quality and data handling capacity of the network, provide our customers with mobile access for the phones, laptops and tablets,and ensuring quality LTE coverage. The attached application explains in detail the modifications T-Mobile is proposing for this wireless facility. Thank you for your consideration and approval of this application. We look forward to working with you to provide better wireless services to your community. Sincerely, t Dan Gustafeni Manager,T-Mobile Engineering Department 1 � • . PINNACLE TE�ECOM GROUp Professional and Technical Services ry ANTENNA SITE FCC RF COMp�IANCE ASSESSMENT ANd REpORT T�MObI�E NORTIiEAST LLC SiTE L113544A 21855 CouNry RoAd 48 CurcNocuE, NY Auc,us-r 11, 2014 �4 RIdC�EdA�E AVENUE - SuiTE 209 • CEdAR KNO�LS, NJ 07927 • 973-451-1630 � � CONTENTS INTROdUCT10N ANd SUMMARy 3 ANTENNA ANd TRANSMISSION DATA S COM PLIANCE ANA�y515 $ COMP�IANCE CONC�USION �Z CERTIFICATION �/' AppENdix A. BACICC�ROUNd ON TIiE FCC MPE LIMIT AppENdix B. SUMMARy OF EXPERT QUALIFICATIONS 2 � � INTROdUCTION ANd SUMMARy At the request of T-Mobile Northeast LLC ("T-Mobile"), Pinnacle Telecom Group has performed an independent expert assessment of radiofrequency (RF) levels and related FCC compliance for the modification of a wireless base station antenna operation on an existing monopole at 21855 County Road 48 in Cutchogue, NY. T-Mobile refers to the antenna site by the code "L113544A", and the modification involves an upgrade of its wireless services and reconfiguration of its RF channels in the 1900 MHz and 2100 MHz frequency bands. The FCC requires all wireless operators to perform an assessment of the RF levels from all the transmitting antennas at a site whenever antenna operations are added or modified, and ensure compliance with the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limit in the FCC regulations. In this case, the compliance assessment needs to include the RF effects of existing antenna operations at the site by MetroPCS, Verizon Wireless, Sprint and AT&T. Note that FCC regulations require any future antenna collocators to assess and assure continuing compliance based on the RF effects of all proposed and then-existing antennas at the site. This report describes a mathematical analysis of compliance with the FCC MPE limit for safe continuous exposure of the general public. The RF effects of the antennas are calculated using a standard FCC formula — and the analysis is designed to conservatively overstate the RF levels that actually occur from the antennas. In that way, though, as long as the results indicate RF levels below the MPE limit, we can have great confidence the compliance requirement is satisfied. The results of a compliance assessment can be explained in layman's terms by describing the calculated RF levels as simple percentages of the FCC MPE limit. If the reference for that limit is 100 percent, then calculated RF levels higher than 100 percent indicate the MPE limit is exceeded, while calculated RF levels consistently lower than 100 percent serve as a clear and sufficient demonstration of compliance with the MPE limit. We will also describe the overall worst-case calculated result via the "plain-English" equivalent "times-below-the-limit factor". 3 . • The result of the compliance assessment in this case is as follows: ❑ The conservatively calculated maximum RF level from the combination of the proposed and existing antenna operations at the site is 1.7859 percent of the FCC MPE limit — well below the 100-percent reference for compliance. In other words, the worst-case calculated RF level — even intentionally overstated by the calculations — is still more than 56 times below the FCC limit for safe continuous exposure of the general public to the RF emissions from antennas. ❑ The results of the analysis provide a clear demonstration that the RF levels from the combination of proposed and existing antenna operations satisfy the criteria for controlling potential human exposure to RF emissions, and the proposed and existing antenna operations will be in compliance with the FCC regulations and limits concerning RF safety. Moreover, because of the conservative methodology and operational assumptions applied in the analysis, the RF levels actually caused by the antennas will be even less significant than these calculation results indicate. The remainder of this report provides the following: ❑ relevant technical data on the T-Mobile antenna operation at the site, as proposed to be modified, as well as on the existing antenna operations; ❑ a description of the applicable FCC mathematical model for assessing MPE compliance, and application of the relevant technical data to that model; and ❑ analysis of the results of the calculations, and the compliance conclusion for the site. In addition, two Appendices are included. Appendix A provides background on the FCC MPE limit along with a list of key references. Appendix B provides a summary of the expert qualifications of the individual certifying compliance for the subject antenna site. 4 � • ANTENNA ANd TRANSMISSION DATA The table below summarizes the technical data for the T-Mobile antenna operation, as proposed to be modified. General Dafa Fre uenc Bands 1900 MHz and 2100 MHz Service Covera e T e Sectorized Antenna T e Directional Panel Antenna Centerline Hei ht AGL 90 ft. Antenna Line Loss Conservativel i nored assumed 0 dB 1900 MHz Data Antenna Models (Max. Gain Ericsson AIR21 17.7 dBi RF Channels er Sector 4 at 15 watts, and 1 at 40 watts 100 watts total 2100 MHz Data Antenna Models () Ericsson AIR21 17.6 dBi RF Channels er Sector 2 at 40 watts, and 1 at 20 watts 100 watts total The area below the antennas, at street level, is of interest in terms of potential "uncontrolled" exposure of the general public, so the antenna's vertical-plane emission characteristic is used in the calculations, as it is a key determinant of the relative amount of RF emissions in the "downward" direction. Figures 1 and 2 that follow show the vertical-plane radiation patterns of the proposed T-Mobile antenna models in each frequency band. In this type of antenna radiation pattern diagram, the antenna is effectively pointed at the three o'clock position (the horizon) and the pattern at different angles is described using decibel units. Note that the automatic pattern-scaling feature of our internal software may skew side-by-side visual comparisons of different antenna models, or even different parties' depictions of the same antenna model. 5 � • Figure 1. Ericsson AIR21 Antenna— 1900 MHz Vertical-plane Radiation Pattern 0 deg ho rizo n 5 dB/division Figure 2. Ericsson AIR21 Antenna—2100 MHz Vertical-plane Radiation Pattern . 0 d eg horizon 5 d6/division 6 . � • • As noted at the outset, there are other existing wireless antenna operations to include in the compliance assessment. For each of the wireless carriers, we will conservatively assume operation with maximum channel capacity and at maximum transmitter power in each of their respective FCC-licensed frequency bands. MetroPCS is licensed to transmit in the 2100 MHz frequency band, and uses three 24-watt channels and one 60-watt channel in each antenna sector. Verizon Wireless is licensed to operate in the 700, 850, 1900 and 2100 MHz frequency bands. In the 700 MHz band, Verizon uses one RF channel per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 40 watts. In the 850 MHz band, Verizon uses as many as eight RF channels per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 20 watts. In the 1900 MHz band, Verizon uses as many as four RF channels per antenna sector, with a maximum of 16 watts of transmitter power per channel. In the 2100 MHz band, Verizon uses two 40-watt channels per sector. Sprint is licensed to operate in both the 860 and 1900 MHz frequency bands. In the 860 MHz band, Sprint uses one 20-watt channel per antenna sector. In the 1900 MHz band, Sprint uses as many as six RF channels per antenna sector, with a maximum of 16 watts of transmitter power per channel. AT&T is licensed to operate in the 700, 850, 1900 and 2300 MHz frequency bands. In the 700 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as two RF channels per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 40 watts. In the 850 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as eight RF channels per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 20 watts. In the 1900 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as four RF channels per antenna sector, with a maximum of 16 watts of transmitter power per channel. In the 2300 MHz band, AT&T uses two 50-watt channels per sector. 7 � • • COMpL1ANCE ANA�y515 FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin 65 ("OET Bulletin 65") provides guidelines for mathematical models to calculate the RF levels at various points around transmitting antennas. At street level around an antenna site (in what is called the "far field" of the antennas), the RF levels are directly proportional to the total antenna input power and the relative antenna gain in the downward direction of interest — and the levels are otherwise inversely proportional to the square of the straight-line distance to the antenna. Conservative calculations also assume the potential RF exposure is enhanced by reflection of the RF energy from the ground. Our calculations will assume a 100% "perfect" reflection, the worst-case approach. The formula for street-level MPE compliance calculations for any given wireless antenna operation is as fotlows: MPE% _ (100 * TxPOwer* �O �Gmax-Vdisc)/10 * 4 ) / ( MPE * 4� * R2 ) where MPE% = RF level, expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit applicable to continuous exposure of the general public 100 = factor to convert the raw result to a percentage TxPower = maximum net power into antenna sector, in milliwatts, a function of the number of channels per sector, the transmitter power per channel, and line loss 10 �cmaX-vd�s��,o = numeric equivalent of the relative antenna gain in the downward direction of interest; pattern data is taken from the antenna manufacturer specifications 4 = factor to account for a 100-percent-efficient energy reflection from the ground, and the squared relationship between RF field strength and power density (22= 4) MPE = FCC general population MPE limit R = straight-line distance from the RF source to the point of interest, centimeters 8 � • • The MPE% calculations are performed out to a distance of 500 feet from the facility to points 6.5 feet (approximately two meters, the FCC-recommended standing height) off the ground, as illustrated in the Figure 3, below. antenna height from antenna R bottom to 6.5'above ground level p 500 Ground Distance D from the site Figure 3. Street-level MPE%Calculation Geometry It is popularly understood that the farther away one is from an antenna, the lower the RF level — which is generally but not universally correct. The results of MPE% calculations fairly close to the site will reflect the variations in the vertical- plane antenna pattern as well as the variation in straight-line distance to the antennas. Therefore, RF levels may actually increase slightly with increasing distance within the range of zero to 500 feet from the site. As the distance approaches 500 feet and beyond, though, the antenna pattern factor becomes less significant, the RF levels become primarily distance-controlled, and as a result the RF levels generally decrease with increasing distance, and are well understood to be in compliance. FCC compliance for a collocated antenna site is assessed in the following manner. At each distance point along the ground, an MPE% calculation is made for each antenna operation (including each frequency band), and the sum of the individual MPE% contributions at each point is compared to 100 percent, the normalized reference for compliance with the MPE limit. We refer to the sum of 9 � . � the individual MPE% contributions as "total MPE%", and any calculated total MPE% result exceeding 100 percent is, by definition, higher than the FCC limit and represents non-compliance and a need to mitigate the potential exposure. If all results are consistently below 100 percent, on the other hand, that set of results serves as a clear and sufficient demonstration of compliance with the MPE limit. Note that according to the FCC, when directional antennas and sectorized coverage arrangements are used, the compliance assessments are based on the RF effect of a single (facing) sector, as the RF effects of directional antennas facing generally away are insignificant. Based on FCC guidelines, the following conservative methodology and assumptions are incorporated into the MPE% calculations on a general basis: 1. The antennas are assumed to be operating continuously at maximum power and maximum channel capacity. In addition, the effects of antenna line loss will be ignored wherever possible. 2. The power-attenuation effects of shadowing or other obstructions to the line-of-sight path from the antenna to the point of interest are ignored. 3. The calculations intentionally minimize the distance factor (R) by assuming a 6'6" human and performing the calculations from the bottom (rather than the centerline) of each party's lowest-mounted antenna, as applicable. 4. The potential RF exposure at ground level is assumed to be 100-percent enhanced (increased) via a "perFecY' field reflection from the ground itself. The net result of these assumptions is to significantly overstate the calculated RF exposure levels relative to the levels that will actually occur— and the purpose of this conservatism is to allow very "safe-side" conclusions about compliance. The table on the next page provides the results of the MPE% calculations for each operator, with the worst-case overall result highlighted in bold in the last column. 10 Ground T-Mobile T-Mobile MetroPCS Verizon Sprint AT&T Total Distance 1900 MHz 2100 MHz Wireless ft MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% 0 0.0045 0.0341 0.0107 0.0082 0.0050 0.0327 0.0952 20 0.0169 0.0520 0.0022 0.0316 0.0104 0.2244 0.3375 40 0.0110 0.0435 0.0571 0.0990 0.0261 0.2386 0.4753 60 0.0105 0.2025 0.2408 0.1321 0.0238 0.7421 1.3518 • 80 0.0329 0.2999 0.0450 0.3209 0.0765 0.8251 1.6003 100 0.0068 0.1485 0.0527 0.0748 0.0791 0.8599 1.2218 120 0.0233 0.0534 0.0643 0.2309 0.0213 0.6819 1.0751 140 0.0196 0.1232 0.0369 0.1456 0.0403 0.3923 0.7579 160 0.0049 0.1967 0.0364 0.3563 0.0327 0.2008 0.8278 180 0.0095 0.1662 0.0319 0.2272 0.0738 0.1622 0.6708 200 0.0117 0.1090 0.0216 0.1768 0.0470 0.1832 0.5493 220 0.0002 0.0468 0.0411 0.2645 0.0260 0.3567 0.7353 240 0.0072 0.0048 0.0523 0.3303 0.0335 0.4539 0.8820 260 0.0040 0.0017 0.0402 0.2796 0.0383 0.6122 0.9760 280 0.0000 0.0133 0.0157 0.1569 0.0310 0.7706 0.9875 300 0.0054 0.0402 0.0144 0.1107 0.0166 0.9207 1.1080 320 0.0192 0.0771 0.0228 0.1642 0.0101 1.0706 1.3640 340 0.0305 0.1249 0.0338 0.2170 0.0224 0.9522 1.3808 360 0.0267 0.1789 0.0402 0.3545 0.0200 1.0626 1.6829 380 0.0241 0.1613 0.0385 0.3204 0.0450 0.9565 1.5458 400 0.0103 0.2158 0.0350 0.3992 0.0694 1.0562 1.7859 � 420 0.0008 0.2718 0.0279 0.4486 0.0631 0.9600 1.7722 440 0.0008 0.2484 0.0195 0.4105 0.0577 1.0410 1.7779 460 0.0007 0.2279 0.0179 0.4219 0.0675 0.9540 1.6899 480 0.0049 0.2792 0.0123 0.3888 0.0621 0.8774 1.6247 500 0.0046 0.2579 0.0114 0.3595 0.0574 0.8096 1.5004 11 � • • . As indicated, the worst-case calculated overall result is 1.7859 percent of the FCC MPE limit. A graph of the overall calculation results, provided on the next page, provides perhaps a clearer visual illustration of the insignificance of the calculated RF levels. The line representing the calculation results barely noticeably rises above the graph's baseline, and shows an obviously clear and consistent margin to the FCC MPE limit. COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT RESULTS �.� Normalized FCC MPE Limit �� Total MPE% Results 120 a 100 � Q 80 0 a 60 __. _ c __ __ _ - - d C� 40 w 0 � 20 0 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 Distance (ft) COMP�IANCE CONC�USION According to the FCC, the MPE limit has been constructed in such a manner that continuous human exposure to RF fields up to and including 100 percent of the MPE limit is acceptable and safe. In this case, the maximum calculated RF level from the combination of the proposed and existing antenna operations at the site 1.7859 percent of the FCC MPE limit. In other words, even with the significant degree of conservatism in the 12 ' . � r analysis, the worst-case calculated RF level is still more than 56 times below the FCC MPE limit. The results of the calculations indicate clear compliance with the FCC MPE limit. Moreover, because of the conservative calculation methodology and operational assumptions applied in this comptiance analysis, the RF levels actually caused by the antennas will be even less significant than the calculation results indicate. CERTIfICAT10N The undersigned certifies as follows: 1. I have read and fully understand the FCC regulations concerning RF safety and the control of human exposure to RF fields (47 CFR 1.1301 et seq). 2. To the best of my knowledge, the statements and information disclosed in this report are true, complete and accurate. 3. The analysis of site RF compliance provided herein is consistent with the applicable FCC regulations, additional guidelines issued by the FCC, and industry practice. 4. The results of the analysis indicate that the subject antenna operations will be in clear compliance with the FCC limit concerning potential RF exposure. 8/11/14 Danie Collins Date Chie echnicalOfficer 13 t � • • AppENdix A. BACI(C�ROUNd ON TIiE FCC MPE LIMIT FCC Rules and Regulations As directed by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the FCC has established limits for maximum continuous human exposure to RF fields. The FCC maximum permissible exposure (MPE) limits represent the consensus of federal agencies and independent experts responsible for RF safety matters. Those agencies include the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In formulating its guidelines, the FCC also considered input from the public and technical community— notably the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). The FCC's RF exposure guidelines are incorporated in Section 1.301 et seq of its Rules and Regulations (47 CFR 1.1301-1.1310). Those guidelines specify MPE limits for both occupational and general population exposure. The specified continuous exposure MPE limits are based on known variation of human body susceptibility in different frequency ranges, and a Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) of 4 watts per kilogram, which is universally considered to accurately represent human capacity to dissipate incident RF energy (in the form of heat). The occupational MPE guidelines incorporate a safety factor of 10 or greater with respect to RF levels known to represent a health hazard, and an additional safety factor of five is applied to the MPE limits for general population exposure. Thus, the general population MPE limit has a built-in safety factor of more than 50. The limits were constructed to appropriately protect humans of both sexes and all ages and sizes and under all conditions — and continuous exposure at levels equal to or below the applicable MPE limits is considered to result in no adverse health effects or even health risk. The reason for two tiers of MPE limits is based on an understanding and assumption that members of the general public are unlikely to have had appropriate RF safety training and may not be aware of the exposures they receive; occupational exposure in controlled environments, on the other hand, is assumed to involve individuals who have had such training, are aware of the exposures, and know how to maintain a safe personal work environment. The FCC's RF exposure limits are expressed in two equivalent forms, using alternative units of field strength (expressed in volts per meter, or V/m), and power density (expressed in milliwatts per square centimeter, or mW/cm2). The table on the next page lists the FCC limits for both occupational and general population exposures, using the mW/cm2 reference, for the different radio frequency ranges. 14 � + • • Frequency Range(F) Occupational Exposure General Public Exposure (MHz) (mWlcm2) (mWlcm2) 0.3 - 1.34 100 100 1.34 - 3.0 100 180/ F2 3.0 - 30 900 / F2 180 / F2 30 - 300 1.0 0.2 300 - 1,500 F / 300 F / 1500 1,500 - 100,000 5.0 1.0 The diagram below provides a graphical illustration of both the FCC's occupational and general population MPE limits. Power Density (mWlcmz) 100 Occupational , . , `�`. --------- General Public . � . , � , 5.0 �� . , . . � , 1.0 �� --------- � � . � � ; . , , ; , , � 0.2 �`--------'� I I I I I I I 0.3 1.34 3.0 30 300 1,500 100,000 Frequency(MHz) Because the FCC's RF exposure limits are frequency-shaped, the exact MPE limits applicable to the instant situation depend on the frequency range used by the systems of interest. 15 .. � • • The most appropriate method of determining RF compliance is to calculate the RF power density attributable to a particular system and compare that to the MPE limit applicable to the operating frequency in question. The result is usually expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit. For potential exposure from multiple systems, the respective percentages of the MPE limits are added, and the total percentage compared to 100 (percent of the limit). If the result is less than 100, the total exposure is in compliance; if it is more than 100, exposure mitigation measures are necessary to achieve compliance. Note that the FCC "categorically excludes" certain types of antenna facilities from the routine requirement to specifically (i.e., mathematically) demonstrate compliance with the MPE limit. Among those types of facilities are cellular antennas mounted on any type of tower, when the bottoms of the antennas are more than 10 meters (c. 32.8 feet) above ground. The basis for the categorical exclusion, according to the FCC, is the understanding that because of the low power and the directionality of the antennas, such facilities — individually and collectively — are well understood to have no significant effect on the human environment. As a result, the FCC automatically deems such facilities to be in compliance. FCC References on Compliance 47 CFR, FCC Rules and Regulations, Part 1 (Practice and Procedure), Section 1.1310 (Radiofrequency radiation exposure limits). FCC Second Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FCC 97-303), In the Matter of Procedures for Reviewing Requests for Relief From State and Local Regulations Pursuant to Section 332(c)(7)(8)(v) of the Communications Act of 1934 (WT Docket 97-192), Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation (ET Docket 93-62), and Petition for Rulemaking of the Cellular Telecommunicafions Industry Association Concerning Amendment of the Commission's Ru/es to Preempt State and Local Regulation of Commercial Mobile Radio Service Transmitting Facilities, released August 25, 1997. FCC First Memorandum Opinion and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, released December 24, 1996. FCC Report and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, released August 1, 1996. FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields", Edition 97-01, August 1997. FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 56, "Questions and Answers About Biological Effects and Potential Hazards of RF Radiation", edition 4, August 1999. 16 . . � � , AppENdix B. SUMMARy OF EXPERT QUA�IFICATIONS Daniel J. Collins, Chief Technical Officer, Pinnacle Telecom Group, LLC Synopsis: • 40+years of experience in all aspects of wireless system engineering, related regulation, and RF exposure • Has performed or led RF exposure compliance assessments on more than 17,000 antenna sites since the new FCC rules went into effect in 1997 • Has provided testimony as an RF compliance expert more than 1,400 times since 1997 • Have been accepted as an expert in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Pennsylvania and more than 40 other states, as well as b the FCC Education: • B.E.E., City College of New York(Sch. Of Eng.), 1971 • M.B.A., 1982, Fairleigh Dickinson University, 1982 • Bronx Hi h School of Science, 1966 Current Responsibilities: • Leads all PTG staff work involving RF safety and FCC compliance, microwave and satellite system engineering, and consultin on wireless technolo and re ulation Prior Experience: • Edwards& Kelcey, VP—RF Engineering and Chief Information Technology Officer, 1996-99 • Bellcore (a Bell Labs offshoot after AT&T's 1984 divestiture), Executive Director—Regulation and Public Policy, 1983-96 • AT&T(Corp. HQ), Division Manager—RF Engineering, and Director—Radio Spectrum Management, 1977-83 • AT&T Long Lines, Group Supervisor—Microwave Radio S stem Desi n, 1972-77 Specific RFSafety/ • Involved in RF exposure matters since 1972 Compliance Experience: . Have had lead corporate responsibility for RF safety and compliance at AT&T, Bellcore, Edwards& Kelcey, and PTG • While at AT&T, helped develop the mathematical models later adopted by the FCC for predicting RF exposure • Have been relied on for compliance by all major wireless carriers, the federal government as well as several state and local governments, system integrators, and other consultin and en ineerin firms Other Background: • Author, Microwave System Engineering(AT&T, 1974) • Co-author and executive editor, A Guide to New Technologies and Services(Bellcore, 1993) • National Spectrum Managers Association (NSMA)—former three-term President and Chairman of the Board of Directors; was founding member, twice-elected Vice President, long-time member of the Board, and was named an NSMA Fellow in 1991 • Published more than 35 articles in indust ma azines 17 • • � PAUL J. FCJRD AND COMPANY S T R U C T U R A L E N G 1 N f E R S 2�0 East Broad 5treet • Suite b00 • .Coliunbus, phia 43215-3;�08 Date: February 14,2014 Marianne Dunst Paul J Ford and Company Crown Castle 250 E. Broad Street, Suite 600 3530 Toringdon Way, Suite 300 Columbus, OH 43215 Charlotte, NC 28277 614.221.6679 704.405.6580 cmccartney@pjfweb.com Subject: Structural Analysis Report Carrier Designation: T-Mobile Co-Locate Carrier Site Number: U13544 Carrier Site Name: NA Crown Cast/e Designation: Crown Castle BU Number: 806579 Crown Castle Site Name: NY CUTCHOGUE 958280 Crown Castle JDE Job Number: 259690 Crown Castle Work Order Number: 711582 Crown Castle Application Number: 216266 Rev. 2 Engineering Firm Designation: Paul J Ford and Company Project Number: 37514-0293 Site Data: 21855 COUNTRY RD,CUTCHOGUE,Suffolk County, NY Latitude 41° 1'46.57", Longitude-72°29'S0.29" 100 Foot-Monopole Tower with 8.5 Foot Extension Dear Marianne Dunst, Pau/J Ford and Company is pleased to submit this "Structural Analysis Report" to determine the structural integrity of the above mentioned tower. This analysis has been performed in accordance with the Crown Castle Structural 'Statement of Wark' and the terms of Crown Castle Purchase Order Number 617239, in accordance with application 216266, revision 2. The purpose of the analysis is to determine acceptability of the tower stress level. Based on our analysis we have determined the tower stress level for the structure and foundation, under the following load case, to be: LC7: Existing+ Reserved+ Proposed Equipment Sufficient Capacity Note:See Table I and Table II for the proposed and existing/reserved loading,respectively. The structural analysis was perFormed for this tower in accordance with the requirements of the ANS I/TIA-222- G-2005 Standard, "Structural Standard for Antenna Supporting Structures and Antennas", with ANSI/TIA-222-G- 1-2007 and ANSIlTIA-222-G-2-2009 Addenda using a 3-second gust wind speed of 120 mph with no ice, 50 mph with 0.75 inch ice thickness and 60 mph under service loads, exposure category C with topographic category 1 and crest height of 0 feet. All modifications and equipment proposed in this report shall be installed in accordance with the referenced drawings for the determined available structural capacity to be effective. We at Pau/J Ford and Company appreciate the opportunity of providing our continuing professional services to you and Crown Castle. If you have any questions or need further ' this or any other projects please give us a call. ��pF NEby Y g��'�K. �cEq,4�49* Respectfully submitted by: � t Q� t� Corey McCartney, EI �� Q Structural Designer n � w tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 y� {? ��---�' �° �d�52 � SEP 1 0 2014 E • • February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293, Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 4)INTRODUCTION 2)ANALYSIS CRITERIA Table 1 - Proposed Antenna and Cable Information Table 2- Existing and Reserved Antenna and Cable Information 3)ANALYSIS PROCEDURE Table 3- Documents Provided 3.1)Analysis Method 3.2)Assumptions 4)ANALYSIS RESULTS Table 4- Section Capacity (Summary) Table 5—Tower Components vs. Capacity 4.1) Recommendations 5)APPENDIX A tnxTower Output 6)APPENDIX B Base Level Drawing 7)APPENDIX C Additional Calculations tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 • � February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Sfructural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 3 1) INTRODUCTION This tower is a 100-ft Monopole tower designed by ENGINEERED ENDEAVORS, INC. in August of 1991. The tower was originally designed for a wind speed of 80 mph per EIA 222D. 2)ANALYSIS CRITERIA The structural analysis was performed for this tower in accordance with the requirements of the ANS I/TIA-222- G-2005 Standard, "Structurai Standard for Antenna Supporting Structures and Antennas", with ANSI/TIA-222-G- 1-2007 and ANSI/TIA-222-G-2-2009 Addenda using a 3-second gust wind speed of 120 mph with no ice,50 mph with 0.75 inch ice thickness and 60 mph under service loads, exposure category C with topographic category 1 and crest height of 0 feet. Table 1 -Proposed Antenna and Cable Information Center Number Number Feed Mounting Line Antenna of Antenna Model of Feed Line Note Level (ft) Elevation Antennas Manufacturer Lines Size(in) (ft) _.... ___.. _ _ _..__. _ _ � ERICSSON AIR 21 62A : � j 3 ericsson g4P w/Mount Pipe � � 3 88.0 3 90.0 ��3 ericsson � ' ~ERICSSON AIR 21 B4A : 1 1-5/8 { - � � B2P w/Mount Pipe � � f . . ..._.... . ......««......, { � 3 ericsson �� KRY 112 144/1 j Table 2 -Existing and Reserved Antenna and Cable lnformation Center Number Number Feed Mounting Line Antenna of Antenna Model of Feed Line Note Level (ft) Elevation Antennas Manufacturer Lines Size(in) (ft) _. ;.... . _ _. ... 110.0 6 andrew HBX-4517DS-VTM ' 108.0 ; �� w/Mount Pipe �� -5�$ ; � ; � m__._._.._. � . _____�_._.:_._.._.._ _________ � _ _....�..�._____,_.._._....m______�: 1 � 3/8 � '` ..� 108.0 ; _ 1 tower mounts ' T-Arm Mount[TA 702-3] ; ; _...__. _.. _. _........ _ __._. .. ...... ............... _. _, 3 antel ADA-63406380CF � , w/Mount Pipe , __.. ,_.... _....... ____ . . .... __ _.._...._ _ : - - 3 6 antel ADA-85408580CF ; w/Mount Pipe , _...._. _._. _....... _.._ ... _.. ....... , _..._. . , .. 104.0 3 antel 8�-171090/8CF � ! 102.0 : w/Mount Pipe E _... ,.. _... __ _. _ . 6 antel BXA-70090/4CF - ; - 2 ; w/Mount Pipe _.. _. ...... . _.... : ' ' 6 rts celwave FD9R6004 � ; � ' _____��__ _,- �_ � � _- _�._ _ �._.�._.� — ___�__ ; 1 pole mounts 8-ft Ladder 1 1/2 102.0 ; � �; _ __,_. __ 1 � tower mounts Platform Mount[LP 602-1]; �� ; 7�$ i ______ ___ ti____. _., _. �._____ .._...__. ____ __..,__�________..._.._.�, ____- -- _�_.. ___� ' 100.0 100.0 1 comsat rsi A-18A24N-U 1 _ _. _ . _ _....__.. . __ _._ 3 andrew E15S08P80 ' ; � � 90A �3 andrew� y, E15S09P94 � _ � f � 6 � andrew TMBXX-6516-R2M _ _ � 3 ; ; 88.0 w/Mount Pipe : ' ; , _. ____.� � _.._____..�__,_._,_ ...__.._ __.u_._ _____.__.__.��.....�....�._� �: �� 89.0 6 ems wireless RR65-19-02DP w/Mount Pipe -_. _.__.. w�..__________�._�_.�_ _.___.._ �_.___._�_�.._._�___ _:�._..�.._.___�_. _... _ _.� 88.0 1 tower mounts T-Arm Mount[TA 602-3] ; 12 7/8 1 , _._ _ _ __ _..... _. _..._ _ _...._ __ _ __ _� tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 • • February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Projecf Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 4 Center Number Number Feed Mounting Line of Antenna Antenna Model of Feed Line Note Level (ft) Elevation Antennas Manufacturer Lines Size (in) (ft) _ _ _. 80.0 12 ; decibel DB845N65ZAXT � 78.0 ; w/Mount Pipe �2 ; 7/8 � 1 � _.___.._.__.___ _._____ �.;_._.__._____._._....�_._�..._.__.._...�.... ; 78.0 1 tower mounts ;Platform Mount[LP 303-1]; ; � _. _.. __..._ ..._... ...... ... ......... .........................-- -... _..... .... . ..._. __..... , � 3 alcatel lucent 9442 RRH 700 ; � �3 � alcatei lucent�; � 9442 RRH AWS � � � _.. __._... _......,.._._._._...... . __.__._.. _._..._ ; � 3 andrew DBXNH-6565A-A2M j ; t w/Mount Pipe ` , ' ! __..... ._.. .. _......... _... . ; _...... . ......._.._..... . . _..__ . j DBXNH-8585A-A2M ' � , 3 andrew � W/Mount Pipe 1 3/8 � i 70.0 ; 70.0 6 andrew . ETD819G-12UB __ 2 7/8 � 1 � � �6V�� andrew ETM190G-12UB i j '_._...._.._..6_._........._.....:__...............clearcomm..............--- ..._...._.....__CCDP-565-.1.�.._.._...____ � � j 3 kathrein '800 10121 w/Mount Pipe ? ; , .�..�..._ :____._______....._.�.�___ _____ ; 1 raycap ; DC6-48-60-18 8F � _ _.._............._..- - -....._......._... .i . . .....- � ' 3 � � � 1 tower mounts ; T-Arm Mount[TA 601-3] '; ' ;.__�.w__�....___�.e�.__.._�._._�___._______;__________ .�.._.____. ' ' ; ; _�_� _..__ _.____ ` 30.0 � maxrad GPS-TMG-26NMS � ,' _ __ _ _ _. _.. _.. _... � _..._. j 30.0 1 ; tower mounts Pipe Mount[PM 601-1] ; 1 1/2 � 1 } �.__ �._�____._._.___,�___.____..__.��.��.._.�., - --____.�_...�...__.______�.� .____ ____ Notes: 1) Existing Equipment 2) Reserved Equipment 3) Equipment To Be Removed 3)ANALYSIS PROCEDURE Table 3 -Documents Provided Document Remarks Reference Source __ _ _ GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS ; FDH, 04-1016E, 10/12/04 949960 CCISITES _ _.. __._. ............ ,...._........._... _._. ... _..._ _._... _ _._._ __--- ' POST-MODIFICATION pJF,41704-0162, 12/05/05 1150968 CCISITES iNSPECTION ______. _... .--- _....... __ _..... __ _.... - _..... __ _ _ POST-MODIFICATION GPD, 2010111.68, 08/26/10 2710931 ; CCISITES INSPECTION _..�_____.____ _.�_ ___.�._____.__.�m....__._�.__,Y._.__ ,___ ...�___.______.._______ . POST-MODIFICATION GPD, 2012788.50, 11/08/12 3385255 CCISITES INSPECTION _ _---- ------ _.._. -- - ..._ _ ...._._.. ......_. . _ . .............. .--- � TOWER FOUNDATION NYNEX, 07/31/91 260900 CCISITES DRAWI NGS/DESIGN/SPECS _. . _.__...._._.. . .._._, _._.... ;....... __. _ ;_........ ___ .._ _...... ___ , ; TOWER MANUFACTURER EEI, CSONY257, 08/21/91 ; 642734 CCISITES i DRAWINGS _.___�._.___ _ ___._,. __. _.__..�._ _.__._..__�.__�__� _..___ .__.__...____.__________,_._._____ _..., ! TOWER REINFOR CEMENT PJF, 37512-2161 BP R1, 12/18/12. 3406575 CCISITES DESIGN/DRAWI NGS/DATA _..... _.._.. __ _....... . _.. _..._.... _ ___... _..._. _._......._ ......... . _._. 3.1) Analysis Method tnxTower(version 6.1.4.1), a commercially available analysis software package,was used to create a three-dimensional model of the tower and calculate member stresses for various loading cases. Selected output from the analysis is included in Appendix A. tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 • • February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 5 3.2) Assumptions 1) Tower and structures were built in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 2) The tower and structures have been maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specification. 3) The configuration of antennas,transmission cables, mounts and other appurtenances are as specified in Tables 1 and 2 and the referenced drawings. 4) Monopole was reinforced in conformance with the referenced modification drawings. 5) Monopole will be reinforced in cqnformance with the referenced proposed modification drawings. 6) Existing 2.5"diameter Dywidag anchors have been considered to be ineffective due to capacity of the anchor brackets. This analysis may be affected if any assumptions are not valid or have been made in error. Paul J Ford and Company should be notified to determine the efFect on the structural integrity of the tower. 4)ANALYSIS RESULTS Table 4 -Section Capacity(Summary} Section Elevation(ft) Component SiZe Critical P(K) SF`P allow % pass/Fail No. Type Element (K) Capacity _..... ,...... L1 108 5-100.5 � Pole �� TP12x12x0.375 � j 1 � -1.96 431.40 j 31 4 Pass� �� .:..-. .-.,- _._.�__„ L2 100.5-100 � Pole ; TP14.5x12x0 375 � 2 � -1.97 431 40 � 31.3 Pass � _._.. __.. .. _ . ..__._,.... ; __ .. .:. _ i..... . ......_ ; _ _ ! L3 100-82.25 � Pole ; TP18.5568x14.5x0.1875 I 3 � -4.41 785.63 `. 88.6 Pass s ,._______;--_ _ ...,�._______�__.__._________...__ �__...,.__..�__._.._._._ _._._ _ ,._..-�_,_ € i L4 $2'25 � Pole TP18J663x18.5568x0.4923 £ 4 � �.55 213541 ; 35.1 Pass ; 81.3333 ; ! ' ; ; ` � ? --J .._.-____ �,.__.___..______ _�_ ,�___...___..___ ____ ;__.____._.r..__ 81.3333- 9 L5 76.6667 � Pole TP19.8329x18J663x1.0534 3 5 � -7.19 469517 � 21.4 Pass � . _ _.... ........... __.. . ? � ......._.._ ---....� 76:6667- � ? 2166 18 Y 50 0 Pass ; L6 73 5�8� ' Pole TP20.5387x19.8329x0.4544 ; 6 � -7.65 �� _� ' � _ �� 73.5787 j pole TP21.7666x20.5387x0.9264 ' 7 -11.24 4582 25 33.5 ?� Pass � 66.4167 } ; � ' ; ..._._�A..� .__�W__W____. ' ��____ ___.____..__._...._. ._..__.. �_.. _ ,._ .._.__. -.._�..�_.._._. ._.___._ ___� 66.4167- � ' � i i L8 60�� Pole sTP23.1648x21.7666x0.4798 ; 8 � -12.49 : 2583.18 E 70.0 Pass � . . ........ .. ..... i_ _._..... :.. _...... . _ .._......... __........_�_............ � _....... _7 ' L9 33.9351 � Pole TP29.0368x23.1648x0.4966 � 9 ' -17.82 3255.05 = 86.9 Pass } � � ; ; �._._._.__Y__ __..__..__ �.__ . _____..._._ _.�.�._...W_3________._ _ �_.}___._ ._�, ___.._ _, L10 3330 51 � Pole i TP28.2292x27.1193x0.5393 � 10 � -20.58 3672.53 � 87.5 Pass , , _ ..._ _...__. . ?_. __.___.._ _ _._.__._ ;_ ___..- _� __..... _..__ - L11 30.5-28J5 � Pole i TP29.6177x29.2292x0.5905 j 11 -21.17 � 4068.51 ; 81.0 Pass 28.75- _.�._.._._.__ �� _._..,....,__....._____,�... _.. __. ; L12 16.125 Pole 'TP32A203x29.6177x0.6252 = 12 ; -25.42 : 4717 67 ': 80.4 Pass i L13 112�875 ��Pole TP33.1418x32.4203x0.6135 = 13� � -26.55 : 4736 21 ; 82.5� ; Pass j ..,,.. _ ._.............__,.__... .,.....»....,.....�.„._,._............__.«.,..... 3 _...... ... ._.._...., ._ ....�..�} � �12.875 �M ' � � : L74 $125 Pole TP34.1963x33.1418x0.6385 � 14 � -28.28 € 5085.22 ; 80.4 Pass � ; ; : ' a ' L15�!8 125-5 875 H�Pole TP34.6958x34.1963x0 5937 15 ��-29.09 ; 4805 25 : 86.5 Pass _.. , � _ _. .�. __.. _........ • - -- - - _.._._._... .. � _..._ ;. __ .. L16 I 5.875 4 5 `, Pole TP35.001x34.6958x0.5923 i 16 ' -29.57 ; 4836.94 ; 86.9 Pass � . _..�._....__ .�.�,.____w__�______ � ...�...._._ ..... .._ . L17 4 5 3 5 + Pole TP35 223x35.001x0.6653 17 j -29.98 5457 21 78 0 Passµ�� L18 3.5 0 3� Pole � TP36x35.223x0.5908 18� � -31�.25� 4965 31 '�� 87.8 : Pass 1 � _ _ -----.... _......: � ; ;Summary _�..___._ . _.�.��... ..___;_...__ __._.�. _�...._ .....�,_. .. ...._...�_.�..�.____�...-._.__. �._. _� �.,_.._._�.-� ;, > � Pole(L3) ? 88.6 Pass ` � _... . _. � ._..._. _ _..__ ... _ _ .... _...... ;.. . ._...._ _ 3 � Rating= ' 88.6 Pass ; ; , _�._..___. ��__,w______��_.____._. � ____......; .�_.________�____� tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 • • February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ff Extension Tower Strucfural Analysis CC/BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 6 Table 5-Tower Component Stresses vs.Capacity—LC7 Notes Component Elevation (ft) %Capacity Pass/Fail _ _ 1 2 ; Anchor Rods 0 73.7 . ; Pass 1 � � 1 1 ��Base Plate 0 �� 87.8 Pass _....__ . _...._ _;.. _ _....__...__. ...._._ _ ._..__ . . . _ __... _... .. . ... . _.. ____. --....._....._. 1 ; Base Foundation 0 61.8 Pass _____.�_�__ _.�_ _.��._... _._ ._.�.�_____.__. 1 =. Flange Connection ; 100 ; 22.9 ; Pass .,...... �.�...,.,......_.,........3.�.,,�.._.._.......,............�_..., �...._. ...�........�.�_...............m....��..._�.....�............�...�....,... -._.�..................,._...�......��..�.... Structure Rating(max from all components)= 88.6% _ Notes: 1) See additional documentation in"Appendix C—Additional Calculations"for calculations supporting the%capacity consumed. 2) Worst case scenario between existing and post installed anchors. 4.1) Recommendations 1) installed the referenced modification drawings. tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 • • February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 7 APPENDIX A TNXTOWER OUTPUT Tower In ut Data There is a pole section. This tower is designed using the TIA-222-G standard. The following design criteria apply: �� Tower is located in Suffolk County, New York. z) Basic wind speed of 120 mph. s) Structure Class II. a) Exposure Category C. s) Topographic Category 1. s) Crest Height 0.0000 ft. �) Nominal ice thickness of 0.7500 in. 8) Ice thickness is considered to increase with height. s) Ice density of 56.00 pcf. �o) A wind speed of 50 mph is used in combination with ice. ��) Temperature drop of 50 °F. �2) Deflections calculated using a wind speed of 60 mph. �3) A non-linear(P-delta) analysis was used. �a) Pressures are calculated at each section. �5) Stress ratio used in pole design is 1. �s) Local bending stresses due to climbing loads,feed line supports, and appurtertance mounts are not considered. Options Consider Moments-Legs Distribute Leg Loads As Uniform Treat Feedline Bundles As Cylinder Consider Moments-Horizontals Assume Legs Pinned Use ASCE 10 X-Brace Ly Rules Consider Moments-Diagonals � Assume Rigid Index Plate Calculate Redundant Bracing Forces Use Moment Magnification �I Use Clear Spans For Wind Area Ignore Redundant Members in FEA �l Use Code Stress Ratios Use Clear Spans For KL/r SR Leg Bolts Resist Compression �l Use Code Safety Factors-Guys Retension Guys To Initial Tension All Leg Panels Have Same Allowable Escalate Ice �I Bypass Mast Stability Checks Offset Girt At Foundation Always Use Max Kz � Use Azimuth Dish Coefficients �l Consider Feedline Torque Use Special Wind Profile � Project Wind Area of Appurt. Include Angle Block Shear Check Include Bolts In Member Capacity � Autocalc Torque Arm Areas Poles Leg Bolts Are At Top Of Section SR Members Have Cut Ends � Include Shear-Torsion Interaction Secondary Horizontal Braces Leg Sort Capacity Reports By Component Always Use Sub-Critical Flow Use Diamond Inner Bracing(4 Sided) Triangulate Diamond Inner Bracing Use Top Mounted Sockets Add IBC.6D+W Combination Use TIA-222-G Tension Splice Capacity Exemption Ta ered Pole Section Geomet Section Elevation Section Splice Number Top Bottom Wall Bend Pole Grade Length Length of Diameter Diameter Thickness Radius ft ft ft Sides in in rn in L1 108.5000- 8.0000 0.00 Round 12.0000 12.0000 0.3750 � A53-B-35 100.5000 (35 ksi) L2 100.5000- 0.5000 0.00 Round 12.0000 14.5000 0.3750 A53-B-35 100.0000 (35 ksi) L3 100.0000- 17.7500 0.00 12 14.5000 18.5568 0.1875 0.7500 A572-65 82.2500 (65 ksi) L4 82.2500- 0.9167 0.00 12 18.5568 18.7663 0.4923 1.9694 Reinf 65.00 ksi 81.3333 (65 ksi) L5 81.3333- 4.6666 0.00 12 18.7663 19.8329 1.0534 4.2135 Reinf 65.00 ksi 76.6667 (65 ksi) L6 76.6667- 3.0880 0.00 12 19.8329 20.5387 0.4544 1.8177 Reinf 65.00 ksi 73.5787 (65 ksi) tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 • � February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Structural Analysis CCI 8U No 806579 Project Number 37594-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 8 , Section Elevation Section Spfice Number Top Bottom Wall Bend Pole Grade Length Length of Diameter Diameter Thickness Radius ft ft ft Sides in in in in ----...__..........---------------.._...._........._...-----..........................._....._....._._...._.........._.._......._..._._..._...._........_._.._.._............_..---__..._.....__.........---._..._.__......-----.........__._.._...._............_........._...._......_....._......_ L7 73.5787- 7.1620 0.00 12 20.5387 21.7666 0.9264 3.7056 Reinf 65.00 ksi 66.4167 (65 ksi) L8 66.4167- 6.2467 0.00 12 21.7666 23.1648 0.4798 1.9191 Reinf 65.00 ksi 60.1700 (65 ksi) L9 60.1700- 26.2349 4.13 12 23.1648 29.0368 0.4966 1.9864 Reinf 65.00 ksi 33.9351 • (65 ksi) L10 33:9351- 7.5645 0.00 12 27.1193 29.2292 0.5393 2.1573 Reinf 65.00 ksi 30.5000 (65 ksi) L11 30.5000- 1.7500 0.00 12 29.2292 29.6177 0.5905 2.3622 Reinf 65.00 ksi 28.7500 (65 ksi) L12 28.7500- 12.6250 0.00 12 29.6177 32.4203 0.6251 2.5006 Reinf 65.00 ksi 16.1250 (65 ksi) L13 16.1250- 3.2500 0.00 12 32.4203 33.1418 0.6135 2.4538 Reinf 65.00 ksi 12.875Q (65 ksi) L14 12.8750- 4.7500 0.00 12 33.1418 34.1963 0.6385 2.5538 Reinf 65.00 ksi 8.1250 (65 ksi) L15 8.1250-5.8750 2.2500 0.00 12 34.1963 34.6958 0.5937 2.3747 Reinf 65.00 ksi (65 ksi) L16 5.8750-4.5000 1.3750 0.00 12 34.6958 35.0010 0.5923 2.3691 Reinf 65.00 ksi (65 ksi) L17 4.5000-3.5000 1.0000 0.00 12 35.0010 35.2230 0.6653 2.6614 Reinf 65.00 ksi (65 ksi) L18 3.5000-0.0000 3.5000 12 35.2230 36.0000 0.5908 2.3632 Reinf 65.00 ksi (65 ksi) Tapered Pole Pro erties Section Tip Dia. Area 1 r C 1/C J IbQ w w/t in inz in° in in in' in° inz in L1 12.0000 13.6954 231.5910 4.1122 6.0000 38.5985 463.1820 6.8436 0.0000 0 12.0000 13.6954 231.5910 4.1122 6.0000 38.5985 463.1820 6.8436 0.0000 0 L2 12.0000 13.6954 231.5910 4.1122 6.0000 38.5985 463.1820 6.8436 0.0000 0 14.5000 16.6406 415.3006 4.9957 7.2500 57.2828 830.6011 8.3153 0.0000 0 L3 15.0115 8.6412 225.9382 5.1239 7.5110 30.0810 457.8120 4.2529 3.3835 18.045 19.2114 11.0905 477.6622 6.5762 9.6124 49.6922 967.8732 5.4584 4.4707 23.844 L4 19.2114 28.6382 1192.8392 6.4671 9.6124 124.0935 2417.0156 14.0949 3.6538 7.421 19.4283 28.9704 1234.8277 6.5421 9.7210 127.0274 2502.0958 14.2583 3.7099 7.535 L5 19.4283 60.0802 2406.0178 6.3412 9.7210 247.5084 4875.2445 29.5697 2.2063 2.095 20.5325 63.6979 2867.3385 6.7231 10.2734 279.1023 5810.0052 31.3502 2.4922 2.366 L6 20.5325 28.3552 1359.1176 6.9375 10.2734 132.2944 2753.9408 13.9556 4.0974 9.017 21.2632 29.3879 1513.0902 7.1902 10.6390 142.2208 3065.9310 14.4638 4.2865 9.433 L7 21.2632 58.5029 2872.2260 7.0212 10.6390 269.9709 5819.9085 28.7933 3.0216 3262 22.5345 62.1659 3446.2266 7.4608 11.2751 305.6489 6982.9894 30.5962 3.3507 3.617 L8 22.5345 32.8852 1901.9965 7.6207 11.2751 168.6898 3853.9606 16.1851 4.5477 9.479 23.9820 35.0452 2301.9316 8.1212 11.9994 191.8378 4664.3374 17.2482 4.9224 10.26 L9 23.9820 36.2483 2377.4273 8.1152 11.9994 198.1295 4817.3122 17.8403 4.8772 9.821 30.0611 45.6382 4744.9087 10.2174 15.0411 315.4637 9614.4715 22.4617 6.4509 12.99 L10 29.2684 46.1599 4162.5632 9.5156 14.0478 296.3141 8434.4816 22.7185 5.8226 10.796 30.2603 49.8240 5234.5727 10.2710 15.1407 345.7282 10606.663 24.5219 6.3880 11.844 4 L11 30.2603 54.4575 5700.9642 10.2526 15.1407 376.5320 11551.699 26.8023 6.2508 10.585 0 30.6625 55.1962 5936.1304 10.3917 15.3420 386.9214 12028.209 27.1659 6.3549 10.761 6 L12 30.6625 58.3614 6261.5803 10.3793 15.3420 408.1345 12687.659 28.7237 6.2621 10.017 3 33.5640 64.0032 8258.6741 11.3827 16.7937 491.7711 16734.312 31.5004 7.0132 11.219 9 L13 33.5640 62.8294 8113.1832 11.3869 16.7937 483.1077 16439.508 30.9227 7.0446 11.483 8 34.3109 64.2546 8677.8987 11.6452 17.1675 505.4852 17583.775 31.6242 7.2379 11.799 4 'L14 34.3109 66.8217 9010.7365 11.6362 17.1675 524.8729 18258.195 32.8876 7.1709 11.232 1 35.4026 68.9896 9916.4794 12.0137 17.7137 559.8203 20093.475 33.9546 7.4535 11.674 7 L15 35.4026 64.2364 9257.9251 12.0297 17.7137 522.6426 18759.066 31.6152 7.5735 12.757 tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 . � February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Exfension Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 9 Section Tip Dia. Area 1 r C 1/C J It/Q w wR in in2 in` in in in3 in° in2 in _....-------...�_...---- -___._........._..._.�.._ __--- �_..__�....___.-.______-__._..__.........._..__.......__.._....._._.__.._._�_-�___--- 2 35.9197 65.1913 9676.9303 12.2086 17.9724 538.4324 19608.084 32.0852 7.7074 12.982 3 L16 35.9197 65.0391 9655.1449 12.2091 17.9724 537.2203 19563.941 32.0103 7.7112 13.02 2 36.2357 65.6213 9916.7331 12.3183 18.1305 546.9631 20093.989 32.2968 7.7930 13.158 7 L17 36.2357 73.5606 11069.367 12.2922 18.1305 610.5373 22429.539 36.2043 7.5972 11.418 2 0 36.4656 74.0362 11285.458 12.3716 18.2455 618.5330 22867.397 36.4384 7.6567 11.508 1 7 L18 36.4656 65.8846 10086.262 12.3983 18.2455 552.8075 20437.502 32.4264 7.8564 13.298 8 9 37.2699 67.3627 10780.468 12.6765 18.6480 578.1032 21844.152 33.1539 8.0646 13.65 5 p Tower Gusset Gusset Gusset GradeAdjust.Factor Adjust. Weight Mult. Double Angle Dou6/e Ang/e Elevation Area Thickness A, Factor Stitch Bolt Stitch Bolt (per face) A, Spacing Spacing Diagonals Horizontals _ ft ft� in in in ------ - ---.-.�.-_.r__.._ _:._._..---.......__..__..._...---- L1 108.5000- 1 1 1 100.5000 L2 100.5000- 1 1 1 100.0000 L3 100.0000- 1 1 1 82.2500 L4 82.2500- 1 1 1 81.3333 L5 81.3333- 1 1 1 76.6667 L6 76.6667- 1 1 1 73.5787 L7 73.5787- 1 1 1 66.4167 L8 66.4167- 1 1 1 60.1700 L9 60.1700- 1 1 1 33.9351 L10 33.9351- � � � 30.5000 L1130.5000- � � � 28.7500 L12 28.7500- 1 1 1 16.1250 L13 16.1250- 1 1 1 12.8750 L14 12.8750- 1 1 1 8.1250 L15 8.1250- � � 1 5.8750 L16 5.8750- 1 1 1 4.5000 L17 4.5000- 1 1 1 3.5000 L18 3.5000- 1 1 1 0.0000 Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances - Entered As Area Description Face Allow Component Placement Total CnAa Weight or Shield Type Number Leg ft ft�fft plf LDF4-50A(1/2") C No CaAa(Out Of 108.0000-0.0000 1 No Ice 0.0000 0.15 Face) 1/2"Ice 0.0000 0.84 1"Ice 0.0000 2.14 860 10033(3/8) C No CaAa(Out Of 108.0000-0.0000 1 No ice 0.0000 0.00 Face) 1/2"Ice 0.0000 0.50 tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 • • February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extensron Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 10 Description Face Allow Component Placement Total CqAq Weight or Shield Type Number _................................................................................_....�e9........................................_........__.............................__..........._._. .. ft _...._.................._. t�/ft P...�f._........_.__.._. _.__.._..............................................................................._. _.._._..._.._._._._. 1"Ice 0.0000 1.61 AT158J50(1 5/8") C No CaAa(Out Of 108.0000-0.0000 11 No Ice 0.0000 0.70 Face) 1/2"Ice 0.0000 2.21 1"Ice 0.0000 4.34 AT158J50(1 5/8") C No CaAa(Out Of 108.0000-0.0000 1 No Ice 0.1978 0.70 Face) 1/2"Ice 0.2978 221 1"Ice 0.3978 4.34 LDF4-50A(1!2") C No Inside Pole 102.0000-0.0000 1 No Ice 0.0000 0.15 1/2"Ice 0.0000 0.15 1"Ice 0.0000 0.15 LDFS-50A(7/8") C No Inside Pole 102.0000-0.0000 12 No Ice 0.0000 0.33 1/2"Ice 0.0000 0.33 1"Ice 0.0000 0.33 LDF7-50A(1-5/8") C No CaAa(Out Of 88.0000-0.0000 1 No Ice 0.0000 0.82 Face) 1/2"Ice 0.0000 2.33 1"Ice 0.0000 4.46 LDF5-50A(7/8") C No Inside Pole 88.0000-0.0000 12 No Ice 0.0000 0.33 1/2"Ice 0.0000 0.33 1"ICe 0.0000 0.33 VXLS-50(7/8") C No Inside Pole 78.0000-0.0000 12 No Ice 0.0000 0.29 1/2"Ice 0.0000 0.29 1"Ice 0.0000 0.29 2"(Nominal)Conduit C No Inside Pole 70.0000-0.0000 2 No Ice 0.0000 0.72 1/2"Ice 0.0000 0.72 1"Ice 0.0000 0.72 LDF5-50A(7/8") C No Inside Pole 70.0000-0.0000 12 No ice 0.0000 0.33 1/2"Ice 0.0000 0.33 1"Ice 0.0000 0.33 FB-L98B-002-125000( C No Inside Pole 70.0000-0.0000 1 No Ice 0.0000 0.06 3�8) 1!2"Ice 0.0000 0.06 1"Ice 0.0000 0.06 WR-VG86ST-BRD( C No Inside Pole 70.0000-0.0000 2 No Ice 0.0000 0.59 3/4) 1/2"Ice 0.0000 0.59 1"Ice 0.0000 0.59 LDF450A(1/2") C No CaAa(Out Of 30.0000-0.0000 1 No Ice 0.0000 0.15 Face) 1/2"Ice 0.0000 0.84 1"Ice 0.0000 2.14 Aero MP3-08 C No CaAa(Out Of 30.5000-0.0000 1 No Ice 0.4667 0.00 Face) 1/2"Ice 0.5778 0.00 1"Ice 0.6889 0.00 Aero MP3-06 C No CaAa(Out Of 82.5000-30.5000 1 No Ice 0.4343 0.00 Face) 1/2"Ice 0.5454 0.00 1"Ice 0.6566 0.00 Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances Section Areas Tower Tower Face AR AF CAA,a CqAq Weighf Sectio Elevation In Face Out Face n ft __� ft� ft� fY2 K L1 108.5000- A 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 100.5000 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.483 0.07 L2 100.5000- A 0:000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 100.0000 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.099 0.01 L3 100.0000- A 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 82.2500 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.619 9.25 L4 82.2500-81.3333 A 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.579 0.02 tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 � � February 14, 2014 100 Ff Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 11 Tower Tower Face AR AF C,,AA C,4AA Weight Sectio Elevation In Face Out Face ----�....__----....._�---....-_____........................_.....__�._...._..........................._�......_........._._.._...............�...................._.._.._..._�.._..............._................__K__._.._....... L5 81.3333-76.6667 A 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 e o.000 o.000 o.000 o.000 o.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.950 0.09 L6 76.6667-73.5787 A 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.952 0.06 L7 73.5787-66.4167 A 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 4.527 0.17 LS 66.4167-60.1700 A 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.949 0.17 L9 60.1700-33.9351 A 0:000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 16.584 0.72 L10 33.9351-30.5000 A 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.171 0.09 L11 30.5000-28.7500 A 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.163 0.05 L12 28.7500-16.1250 A 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 8.389 0.35 L13 16.1250-12.8750 A 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.160 0.09 L14 12.8750-8.1250 A 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 � C 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.156 0.13 L15 8.1250-5.8750 A 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C Q.000 0.000 0.000 1.495 0.06 L16 5.8750-4.5000 A 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 6.000 0.000 0.914 0.04 L17 4.5000-3.5000 A 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.664 0.03 L18 3.5000-0.0000 A 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.326 0.10 Feed Line/Linear Ap urtenances Section Areas - With Ice Tower Tower Face Ice AR AF CAAA CqAq Weight Sectio Elevation or Thickness In Face Out Face n ft Lep in ftz ftZ ft2 ftz K L1 108.5000- A 1.683 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 100.5000 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 4.008 0:84 L2 100.5000- A 1.676 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 100.0000 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0:000 0.000 0.000 0.267 0.06 i3 100.0000- A 1.660 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 82.2500 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 9.604 2.09 L4 82.2500-81.3333 A 1.643 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0:00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.215 0.11 L5 81.3333-76.6667 A 1.637 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 6.175 0.58 L6 76.6667-73.5787 A 1.629 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 4.075 0.39 L7 73.5787-66.4167 A 1.617 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 • � February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Structural Analysis CC/BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 12 Tower Tower Face Ice AR AF CaA,n CqAq Weight Sectio Elevation or Thickness In Face Out Face __-"--------.........._....._......._�................._..........._.�e.q__._..............-�n--..._......._..............__....�....._.......__._._._._......_�...__..__..............._..........�..._.................................._�.........................................._K_..._............. B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 9.417 0.93 L8 66.4167-60.1700 A 1.601 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 8.171 0.82 L9 60.1700-33.9351 A 1.553 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 33781 3.33 L10 33.9351-30.5000 A 1.496 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C -0.000 0.000 0.000 4.423 0.44 L11 30.5000-28.7500 A 1.484 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.259 0.22 L12 28.7500-16.1250 A 1.443 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 16.079 1.53 L13 16.1250-12.8750 A 1.382 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 e o.000 o.000 o.000 o.000 o.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 4.055 0.38 L14 12.8750-8.1250 A 1.338 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 5.839 0.53 L15 8.1250-5.8750 A 1.284 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.0�0 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.715 0.24 L16 5.8750-4.5000 A 1.247 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.637 0.14 L17 4.5000-3.5000 A 1.215 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.177 Q.10 L18 3.5000-0.0000 A 1.118 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.978 0.32 Feed Line Center of Pressure Section Elevation CPx CPZ CPx CPZ Ice Ice _-----------------------ft---------��----....__--��----._...._.._..-------�n---__----._...__�n.�._....... L1 108.5000- -0.2032 0.1173 -0.3653 0.2109 100.5000 L2 100.5000- -0.2179 0.1258 -0.3989 0.2303 100.0000 L3 100.0000-82.2500 -0.2247 0.1297 -0.4326 0.2497 L4 82.2500-81.3333 -0.5696 0.3288 -0.8344 0.4818 L5 81.3333-76.6667 -0.5749 0.3319 -0.8477 0.4894 L6 76.6667-73.5787 -0.5819 0.3360 -0.8653 0.4996 L7 73.5787-66.4167 -0.5891 0.3401 -0.8831 0.5099 L8 66.4167-60.1700 -0.5981 0.3453 -0.9055 0.5228 L9 60.1700-33.9351 -0.6193 0.3576 -0.9579 0.5530 L10 33.9351-30.5000 -0.6321 0.3649 -0.9952 0.5746 L11 30.5000-28.7500 -0.6608 0.3815 -1.0087 0.5823 L12 28.7500-16.1250 -0.6679 0.3856 -1.0206 0.5893 L13 16.1250-12.8750 -0.6751 0.3898 -1.0283 0.5937 L14 12.8750-8.1250 -0.6785 0.3918 -1.0283 0.5937 L15 8.1250-5.8750 -0.6814 0.3934 -1.0245 0.5915 L16 5:8750-4.5000 -0.6828 0.3942 -1.0198 0.5888 L17 4.5000-3.5000 -0.6838 0.3948 -1.0150 0.5860 L18 3.5000-0.0000 -0.6855 0.3958 -0.9968 0.5755 tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 � � February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Structural Analysis CC/BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 13 Discrete Tower Loads Description Face Otfset Offsets: Azimuth Placement C,,AA CnAa Weight or Type Horz Adjustmen Front Srde Leg Lateral t Vert ft ft fr2 fPz K (t ° ft (2)HBX-4517DS-VTM w/ A From Leg 4.0000 0.00 108.0000 No Ice 6.1632 4.5633 0.05 Mount Pipe 0.00 1/2" 6.6877 5.3798 0.10 2.00 Ice 7.2037 6.1043 0.15 1„Ice (2)HBX-4517DS-VTM w/ B From Leg 4.0000 0.00 108.0000 No Ice 6.1632 4.5633 0.05 Mount Pipe 0.00 1/2" 6.6877 5.3798 0.10 2.00 Ice 7.2037 6.1043 Q.15 1"Ice (2)HBX-4517DS-VTM w/ G From Leg 4.0000 0.00 108.0000 No Ice 6.1632 4.5633 0.05 Mount Pipe 0.00 1/2" 6.6877 5.3798 0.10 2.00 Ice 7.2037 6.1043 0.15 1"Ice T-Arm Mount[TA 702-3] C None 0.00 108.0000 No Ice 5.6400 5.6400 0.34 1/2" 6.5500 6.5500 0.43 Ice 7.4600 7.4600 0.52 1"Ice (2)BXA-70090/4CF w/ A From Leg 4.0000 0.00 102.0000 No Ice 3.9703 3.8847 0.03 Mount Pipe 0.00 1/2" 4.3948 4.4895 0.07 2.00 Ice 4.8299 5.1163 0_11 1"Ice (2)BXA-70090/4CF w/ B From Leg 4.0000 0.00 102.0000 No Ice 3.9703 3.8847 �.03 Mount Pipe 0.00 1!2" 4.3948 4.4895 0.07 2.00 Ice 4.8299 5.1163 0.11 1"Ice (2)BXA-70090/4CF w/ C From Leg 4.0000 0.00 102.0000 No Ice 3.9703 3.8847 0.03 Mount Pipe 0.00 1/2" 4.3948 4.4895 0.07 2.00 Ice 4.8299 5.1163 0.11 1"Ice BXA-171090/8CF w! A From Leg 4.0000 0.00 102.0000 No Ice 3.1574 3.3303 0.03 Mount Pipe 0.00 1/2" 3.5312 3.9423 0.06 2.00 Ice 3.9415 4.5633 0.10 1"Ice BXA-171090l8CF w/ B From Leg 4.0000 0.00 102.0000 No Ice 3.1574 3.3303 0.03 Mount Pipe 0.00 1/2" 3.5312 3.9423 0.06 2.00 Ice 3.9415 4.5633 0.10 1"Ice BXA-171090/8CF w/ C From Leg 4.0000 0.00 102.0000 No Ice 3.1574 3.3303 0.03 Mount Pipe 0.00 1/2" 3.5312 3.9423 0.06 2.00 Ice 3.9415 4.5633 0.10 1"Ice (2)FD9R6004 A From Leg 4.0000 0.00 102.0000 No Ice 0.3665 0.0846 0.00 0.00 1/2" 0.4506 0.1362 0.01 2.00 Ice 0.5433 0.1965 0.01 1"Ice (2)FD9R6004 B From Leg 4.0000 0.00 102.0000 No Ice 0.3665 0.0846 0.00 0.00 1/2" 0.4506 0.1362 0.01 2.00 Ice 0.5433 0.1965 0.01 1"Ice {2)FD9R6004 C From Leg 4.0000 0.00 102.0000 No Ice 0.3665 0.0846 0.00 0.00 1/2" 0.4506 0.1362 0.01 2.00 Ice 0.5433 0.1965 0.01 1"Ice 8-ft Ladder C None 0.00 102.0000 No Ice 7.0700 7.0700 0.04 1/2" 9.7300 9.7300 0.07 Ice 11.1900 11.1900 0.08 1"Ice Platfonn Mount[LP 602-1] C None 0.00 102.0000 No Ice 32.0300 32.0300 1.34 1/2" 38.7100 38.7100 1.80 Ice 45.3900 45.3900 2.26 1"Ice tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 • � February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Exfension Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 14 Description Face Offset Offsets: Azimuth Placement CqAq CAAA Weight or TyPe Horz Adjustmen Front Side Leg Lateral t Vert ft ft ft2 ftz K ft , o ft ERICSSON AIR 21 82A �A �From Leg 4.0000 0.00� 88.0000 No Ice� 6.8253 �5.6424 0.11 64P w/Mount Pipe 0.00 1/2" 7.3471 6.4800 0.17 2.00 Ice 7.8631 7.2567 0.23 1"Ice ERICSSON AIR 21 62A B From Leg 4.0000 0.00 88.0000 No Ice 6.8253 5.6424 0.11 64P w/Mount Pipe 0.00 1/2" 7.3471 6.4800 0.17 2.00 Ice 7.8631 7.2567 0.23 1"Ice ERICSSON AIR 21 B2A C From Leg 4.0000 0.00 88.0000 No Ice 6.8253 5.6424 0.11 64P w/Mount Pipe 0.00 1!2" 7.3471 6.4800 0.17 2.00 Ice 7.8631 7.2567 0.23 1"Ice ERICSSON AIR 21 B4A A From Leg 4.0000 0.00 88.0000 No Ice 6.8253 5.6424 0.11 B2P w/Mount Pipe 0.00 1/2" 7.3471 6.4800 0.17 2.00 Ice 7.8631 7.2567 0.23 1"Ice ERICSSON AIR 21 B4A B From Leg 4.0000 0.00 88.0000 No Ice 6.8253 5.6424 0.11 62P w/Mount Pipe 0.00 1/2" 7.3471 6.4800 0.17 2.00 Ice 7.8631 7.2567 0.23 1"Ice ERICSSON AIR 21 64A C From Leg 4.0000 0.00 88.0000 No Ice 6.8253 5.6424 0.11 62P w/Mount Pipe 0.00 1/2" 7.3471 6.4800 0.17 2.00 tce 7.8631 7.2567 0.23 1"Ice KRY 112 144/1 A From Leg 4.0000 0.00 88.0000 No Ice 0.4083 0.2042 0.01 0.00 1/2" 0.4969 0.2733 0.01 2.00 Ice 0.5941 0.3511 0.02 1"ICe KRY 112 144/1 B From Leg 4.0000 0.00 88.0000 No Ice 0.4083 0.2042 0.01 0.00 1/2" 0.4969 0.2733 0.01 2.00 Ice 0.5941 0.3511 0.02 1"Ice KRY 112 144/1 C From Leg 4.0000 0.00 88.0000 No Ice 0.4083 0.2042 0.01 0.00 1/2" 0.4969 0.2733 0.01 2.00 Ice 0.5941 0.3511 0.02 1"Ice T-Arm Mount[TA 602-3] C None 0.00 88.0000 No Ice 11.5900 11.5900 0.77 1/2" 15.4400 15.4400 0.99 Ice 19.2900 19.2900 1.21 1"Ice 6'x 2.375"Pipe Mount A From Leg 4.0000 0.00 88.0000 No Ice 1.4250 1.4250 0.02 0.00 1/2" 1.9250 1.9250 0.03 0.00 Ice 2.2939 2.2939 0.05 1„Ice 6'x 2.375"Pipe Mount B From Leg 4.0000 0.00 88.0000 No Ice 1.4250 1.4250 0.02 0.00 1/2" 1.9250 1.9250 0.03 0.00 Ice 2.2939 2.2939 0.05 1"Ice 6'x 2.375"Pipe Mount C From Leg 4.0000 0.00 88.0000 No Ice 1.4250 1.4250 0.02 0.00 1/2" 1.9250 1.9250 0.03 0.00 fce 2.2939 2.2939 0.05 1"Ice (4)DB845N65ZAXT w/ A From Leg 4.0000 0.00 78.0000 No Ice 6.0708 6.3903 0.04 Mount Pipe 0.00 1/2" 6.6122 7.3316 0.10 2.00 ice 7.1403 8.1575 0.16 1"Ice (4)D6845N65ZAXT w/ B From Leg 4.0000 0.00 78.0000 No Ice 6.0708 6.3903 0.04 Mount Pipe 0.00 1/2" 6.6122 7.3316 0.10 2.00 Ice 7.1403 8.1575 0.16 1"Ice (4)DB845N65ZAXT w! C From Leg 4.0000 0.00 78.0000 No Ice 6.0708 6.3903 0.04 Mount Pipe 0.00 1/2" 6.6122 7.3316 0.10 2.00 Ice 7.1403 8.1575 0.16 1"Ice tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 � � February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293, Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 15 Description Face Offset Offsets: Azimuth Placement CqAq CqAq Weight or Type Horz Adjustmen Front Side Leg Lateral t Vert ft ft ft2 ff2 K ft ° ft -----------.._ -�_.._._..------__----------.-._._.._..---------------------------...-------------___ Platform Mount[LP 303-1] C None 0.00 78.0000 No Ice 14.6600 14.6600 1.25 1/2" 18.8700 18.8700 1.48 Ice 23.0800 23.0800 1.71 1"Ice 800 10121 w/Mount Pipe A From Leg 4.0000 0.00 70.0000 No Ice 6.0334 4.9479 0.07 0.00 1/2" 6.7136 6.0222 0.12 0.00 Ice 7.2991 6.8104 0.18 1"Ice 800 10121 w/Mount Fipe B From Leg 4.0000 0.00 70.0000 No Ice 6.0334 4.9479 0.07 0.00 1/2" 6.7136 6.0222 0.12 0.00 Ice 7.2991 6.8104 0.18 1"Ice 800 10121 w/Mount Pipe C From Leg 4.0000 0.00 70.0000 No Ice 6.0334 4.9479 0.07 0.00 1/2" 6.7136 6.0222 0.12 0.00 Ice 72991 6.8104 0.18 1"Ice (2)ETD819G-12U6 A From Leg 4.0000 0.00 70.0000 No Ice 2.1506 0.4762 0.03 0.00 1/2" 2.3480 0.603Q 0.04 0.00 Ice 2.5541 0.7385 0.06 1"Ice (2)ETD819G-12UB B From Leg 4.0000 0.00 70.0000 No Ice 2.1506 0.4762 0.03 0.00 1/2" 2.3480 0.6030 0.04 0.00 Ice 2.5541 0.7385 0.06 1"Ice (2)ETD819G-12U6 C From Leg 4.0000 0.00 70.0000 No Ice 2.1506 0.4762 0.03 0.00 1/2" 2.3480 0.6030 0.04 0.00 Ice 2.5541 0.7385 0.06 1"Ice (2)ETM190G-12UB A From Leg 4.0000 0.00 70.0000 No Ice 1.0599 0.4455 0.02 0.00 1/2" 1.2114 0.571 Q 0.02 0.00 Ice 1.3715 0.7052 0.03 1"Ice (2)ETM190G-12UB B From Leg 4.0000 0.00 70.0000 No Ice 1.0599 0.4455 0.02 0.00 1/2" 1.2114 0.5710 0.02 0.00 Ice 1.3715 0.7052 0.03 1"Ice (2)ETM190G-12UB C From Leg 4.0000 0.00 70.0000 No Ice 1.0599 0.4455 0.02 0.00 1/2" 1.2114 0.5710 0.02 0.00 Ice 1.3715 0.7052 0.03 1"Ice (2)CCDP-565-1 W A From Leg 4.0000 0.00 70.0000 No ice 0.5228 0.1626 0.01 0.00 1/2" 0.6224 0.2316 0.01 0.00 Ice 0.7306 0.3092 0.01 1"Ice (2)CCDP-565-1W B From Leg 4.0000 0.00 70.0000 No Ice 0.5228 0.1626 0.01 0.00 1/2" 0.6224 0.2316 0.01 0.00 Ice 0.7306 0.3092 0.01 1"Ice (2)CCDP-565-1 W C From Leg 4.0000 0.00 70.0000 No Ice 0.5228 0.1626 0.01 0.00 1/2" 0.6224 0.2316 0.01 0.00 Ice 0.7306 0.3092 0.01 1"Ice DBXNH-6565A-A2M w/ A From Leg 4.0000 0.00 70.0000 No Ice 6.3065 4.9527 0.06 Mount Pipe 0.00 1/2" 6.8643 5.8187 0.11 0.00 Ice 7.3925 6.5766 0.17 1"Ice DBXNH-6565A-A2M w/ B From Leg 4.0000 0.00 70.0000 No Ice 6.3065 4.9527 0.06 Mount Pipe 0.00 1/2" 6.8643 5.8187 0.11 0.00 Ice 7.3925 6.5766 0.17 1"Ice DBXNH-6565A-A2M w/ C From Leg 4.0000 0.00 70.0000 No Ice 6.3065 4.9527 0.06 Mount Pipe 0.00 1/2" 6:8643 5.8187 0.11 0.00 Ice 7.3925 6.5766 0.17 1"Ice tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 . • • February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 16 Descnption Face Otfset Offsets: Azimuth Placement CnAa CqAq Weight or Type Horz Adjustmen Front Side Leg Lateral t Vert ft ft ft2 ftz K ft ' ft __ _______�_______.__._.._.__._.____.__�__.........__�._.__._._..._________________�______�_.___...__-_.�_.________-.._._---- 9442 RRH 700 A From Leg 4.0000 0.00 70.0000 No Ice 3.5280 1.5960 0.04 0.00 1/2" 3.8007 1.8239 0.06 0.00 Ice 4.0820 2.0605 0.09 1"Ice 9442 RRH 700 B From Leg 4.0000 0.00 70.0000 No Ice 3.5280 1.5960 0.04 0.00 1/2" 3.8007 1.8239 0.06 0.00 Ice 4.0820 2.0605 0.09 1"Ice 9442 RRH 700 C From Leg 4.0000 0.00 70.0000 No Ice 3.5280 1.5960 0.04 0.00 1/2" 3.8007 1.8239 0.06 0.00 Ice 4.0820 2.0605 0.09 1"Ice 9442 RRH AWS A From Leg 4.0000 0.00 70.0000 No Ice 2.5146 1.5894 0.04 0.00 1/2" 2.7457 1.7953 0.06 0.00 Ice 2.9855 2.0098 0.08 1"Ice 9442 RRH AWS B From Leg 4.0000 0.00 70.0000 No Ice 2.5146 1.5894 0.04 0.00 1/2" 2.7457 1.7953 0.06 0.00 Ice 2.9855 2.0098 0.08 1"Ice 9442 RRH AWS C From Leg 4.0000 0.00 70.0000 No Ice 2.5146 1.5894 0.04 0.00 1/2" 2.7457 1.7953 0.06 0.00 Ice 2.9855 2.0098 0.08 1"Ice DC6�8-60-18-8F C From Leg 4.0000 0.00 70.0000 No Ice 2.5667 2.5667 0.02 0.00 1/2" 2.7978 2.7978 0.04 0.00 Ice 3.0377 3.0377 0.07 1"Ice DBXNH-8585A-A2M w/ A From Leg 4.0000 0.00 70.0000 No Ice 6.3078 4.9511 0.05 Mount Pipe 0.00 1!2" 6.8566 5.8001 0.11 0.00 Ice 7.3805 6.5549 0.17 1"Ice DBXNH-8585A-A2M w/ B From Leg 4.0000 0.00 70.0000 No Ice 6.3078 4.9511 0.05 Mount Pipe 0.00 1/2" 6.8566 5.8001 0.11 0.00 ice 7.3805 6.5549 0.17 1"Ice DBXNH-8585A-A2M w/ C From Leg 4.0000 0.00 70.0000 No Ice 6.3078 4.9511 0.05 Mount Pipe 0.00 1/2" 6.8566 5.8001 0.11 0.00 Ice 7.3805 6.5549 0.17 1"Ice T-Arm Mount[TA 601-3] C None 0.00 70.0000 No Ice 10.9000 10.9000 073 1/2" 14.6500 14.6500 0.93 Ice 18.4000 18.4000 1.13 1"Ice GPS-TMG-26NMS A From Leg 4.0000 0.00 30.0000 No Ice 0.1556 0.1556 0.00 0.00 1/2" 0.2130 0.2130 0.00 0.00 Ice 0.2791 0.2791 0.01 1"Ice Pipe Mount[PM 601-1] C None 0.00 30.0000 No Ice 3.0000 0.9000 0.07 1/2" 3.7400 1.1200 0.08 Ice 4.4800 1.3400 0.09 1"Jce Dishes Description Face Dish Offset Offsets: Azimuth 3 d8 Elevation Outside Aperture Weight or Type Type Horz Adjustment Beam Diameter A�ea Leg �ateral �dth Vert n ' ' ft ft fr2 K --- --------- -----.._...._.._._.__...._________ - -----.._._...._..----.........__..._._..-------- A-18A24N-U B Paraboloid w/o From 4.0000 0.00 100.0000 2.0000 No Ice 3.1400 0.03 Radome Leg 0.00 1/2"Ice 3.4100 0.05 tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 � ! • February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Strucfural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 17 Description Face Dish Offset Offsets: Azimuth 3 d8 Elevation Outside Aperture Weight or Type Type Horz Adjustment Beam Diameter Area Leg Lateral Wdth Vert {� ' ° ft ft ftz K -.-.-.-.----._.__._._..---_.�__...___._..__...__.__.____-----.------.--.---...._._.__.._._._.___..__..____.- ---- 0.00 1"Ice 3.6800 0.06 Tower Forces - No Ice - Wind Normal To Face Section Add Self F e CF q: DF DR AE F w Ctrl. Elevation Weight Weight a Face c psf ft K K e ft� K If L1108.5000- 0.07 -0.37 A 1 0.698 44.74 1 1 5.000 0.35 43.48 C 100.5000 B 1 0.698 1 1 8.000 C 1 0.698 1 1 8.000 L2100.5000- 0.01 0.03 A 1 0.689 44.35 1 1 0.552 0.02 46.74 C 100.0000 B 1 0.689 1 1 0.552 C 1 0.689 1 1 0.552 L3100.0000- 0.25 0.60 A 1 1.058 43.43 1 1 25.311 1.45 81.78 C 82.2500 B 1 1.058 1 1 25.311 C 1 1.058 1 1 25.311 L4 82.2500- 0.02 0.09 A 1 1.2 42.49 1 1 1.476 0.11 119.83 C 81.3333 B 1 1.2 1 1 1.476 C 1 1.2 1 1 1.476 L5 81.3333- 0.09 0.98 A 1 1.2 42.17 1 1 7.770 0.57 122.02 C 76.6667 B 1 1.2 1 1 7.770 C 1 1.2 1 1 7.770 L6 76.6667- 0.06 0.30 A 1 1.2 41.73 1 1 5.378 0.39 124.95 C 73.5787 B 1 1.2 1 1 5.378 C 1 1.2 1 1 5.378 L7 73.5787- 0.17 1.47 A 1 1.2 41.11 1 1 13.070 0.91 127.62 C 66.4167 B 1 1.2 1 1 13.070 C 1 1.2 1 1 13.070 L8 66.4167- 0.17 0.72 A 1 1.2 40.25 1 1 12.107 0.82 130.96 C 60.1700 B 1 1.2 1 1 12.107 C 1 1.2 1 1 12.107 L9 60.1700- 0.72 3.66 A 1 1.2 37.73 1 1 59.076 3.63 138.40 C 33.9351 B 1 1.2 1 1 59.076 C 1 1.2 1 1 59.076 L10 33.9351- 0.09 1.24 A 1 1.2 34.92 1 1 8.520 0.48 138.60 C 30.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 8.520 C 1 1.2 1 1 8.520 L1130.5000- 0.05 0.33 A 1 1.2 34.31 1 1 4.442 0.25 140.03 C 28.7500 B 1 1.2 1 1 4.442 C 1 1.2 1 1 4.442 L12 28.7500- 0.35 2.63 A 1 1.2 32.33 1 1 33.786 1.74 137.83 C 16.1250 B 1 1.2 1 1 33.786 C 1 1.2 1 1 33.786 L1316.1250- 0.09 070 A 1 1.2 29.77 1 1 9.191 0.43 132.88 C 12.8750 B 1 1.2 1 1 9.191 C ' 1 1.2 1 1 9.191 L1412.8750- 0.13 1.10 A 1 1.2 29.77 1 1 13.797 0.65 135.89 C 8.1250 B 1 1.2 1 1 13797 C 1 1.2 1 1 13.797 L15 8.1250- 0.06 0.50 A 1 1.2 29.77 1 1 6.686 0.31 138.53 C 5.8750 B 1 1.2 1 1 6.686 C 1 1.2 1 1 6.686 L16 5.8750- 0.04 0.31 A 1 1.2 29.77 1 1 4.134 0.19 139:89 C 4.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 4.134 C 1 1.2 1 1 4.134 L17 4.5000- 0.03 0.25 A 1 12 29.77 1 1 3.029 0.14 140.79 C 3.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 3.029 C 1 1.2 1 1 3.029, L18 3.5Q00- 0.10 0.79 A 1 1.2 29.77 1 1 10.753 0.50 142.48 C 0.0000 B 1 1.2 1 1 10.753 C 1 1.2 1 1 10.753 Sum Weight: 2.50 16.05 OTM 617.24 12.93 ki -ft: tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 • � February 14, 2014 100 Ff Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Strucfural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 18 Tower Forces - No Ice - Wind 60 To Face Section Add Self F e CF q� DF DR AE F w Ctrl. Elevation Weight Weight ' a Face c psf ft K K e ft2 K If L1108.5000- 0.07 0.37 A 1 0.698 44.74 1 1 8.000 0.35 43.48 C 100.5000 B 1 0.698 1 1 8.000 C 1 0.698 1 1 8.000 L2100.5000- 0.01 0.03 A 1 0.689 44.35 1 1 0.552 0.02 4674 C 100.0000 B 1 0.689 1 1 0.552 C 1 0.689 1 1 0.552 L3 100.0000- 0.25 0.60 A 1 1.058 43.43 1 1 25.311 1.45 81 J8 C 82.2500 B 1 1.058 1 1 25.311 C 1 1.058 1 1 25.311 L4 82.2500- 0.02 0.09 A 1 1.2 42.49 1 ] 1.476 0.11 119.83 C 81.3333 B 1 1.2 1 1 1.476 C 1 1.2 1 1 1.476 L5 81.3333- 0.09 0.98 A 1 1.2 42.17 1 1 7.770 0.57 122.02 C 76.6667 B 1 1.2 1 1 7.770 C 1 1.2 1 1 7.770 L6 76.6667- 0.06 0.30 A 1 1.2 41.73 1 1 5.378 0.39 124.95 C 73.5787 B 1 1.2 1 1 5.378 C 1 1.2 1 1 5.378 L7 73.5787- 0.17 1.47 A 1 1.2 41.11 1 1 13.070 0.91 127.62 C 66.4167 B 1 1.2 1 1 13.070 C 1 1.2 1 1 13.070 L8 66.4167- 0.17 0.72 A 1 1.2 40.25 1 1 12.107 0.82 130.96 C 60.1700 B 1 1.2 1 1 12.107 C 1 1.2 1 1 12.107 L9 60.1700- 0.72 3.66 A 1 1.2 37.73 1 1 59.076 3.63 138.40 C 33.9351 B 1 1.2 1 1 59.076 C 1 1.2 1 1 59.076 L10 33.9351- 0.09 1.24 A 1 1.2 34.92 1 1 8.520 0.48 138.60 C 30.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 8.520 C 1 1.2 1 1 8.520 L1130.5000- 0.05 0.33 A 1 1.2 34.31 1 1 4.442 0.25 140.03 C 28.7500 B 1 1.2 1 1 4.442 C 1 1.2 1 1 4.442 L12 28J500- 0.35 2.63 A 1 1.2 32.33 1 1 33.786 1.74 137.83 C 16.1250 B 1 1.2 1 1 33.786 C 1" 1.2 1 1 33.786 L1316.1250- 0.09 0.70 A 1 1.2 29.77 1 1 9.191 0.43 132.88 C 12.8750 B 1 1.2 1 1 9.191 C 1 1.2 1 1 9.191 L14 12.8750- 0.13 1.1 Q A 1 1.2 29.77 1 1 13.797 0.65 135.89 C 8.1250 B 1 1:2 1 1 13.797 C 1 1.2 1 1 13.797 L15 8.1250- 0.06 0.50 A 1 1.2 29.77 1 1 6.686 0.31 138.53 C 5.8750 B 1 1.2 1 1 6.686 C 1 1.2 1 1 6.686 L16 5.8750- 0.04 0.31 A 1 1.2 2977 1 1 4.134 0.19 139.89 C 4.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 4.134 C 1 1.2 1 1 4.134 L17 4.5000- 0.03 0.25 A 1 1.2 29.77 1 1 3.029 0.14 14079 C 3.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 3.029 C 1 1.2 1 1 3.029 L18 3.5000- 0.10 0.79 A 1 1.2 29.77 1 1 10.753 0.50 142.48 C 0.0000 B 1 1.2 1 1 10.753 C 1 1.2 1 1 10.753 Sum Weight: 2.50 16.05 OTM 617.24 12.93 ki -ft tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 � • February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 296266, Revision 2 Page 19 Tower Forces - No Ice - Wind 90 To Face Section Add Self F e CF ' qZ DF DR AE F w Ctrl. Elevation Weight Weight a Face � psf ft K K e ft K If L1108.5000- 0.07 0.37 A 1 0.698 44.74 1 1 8.000 0.35 43.48 C 100.5000 B 1 0.698 1 1 8.000 C 1 0.698 1 1 8.000 L2100.5000- 0.01 0.03 A 1 0.689 44.35 1 1 0.552 0.02 46.74 C 100.0000 B 1 0.688 1 1 0.552 C 1 0.689 1 1 0.552 L3100.0000- 0.25 0.60 A 1 1.058 43.43 1 1 25.311 1.45 81.78 C 82.2500 B 1 1.058 1 1 25.311 � C 1 1.058 1 1 25.311 L4 82.2500- 0.02 0.09 A 1 1.2 42.49 1 1 1.476 0.11 119.83 C 81.3333 B 1 1.2 1 1 1.476 C 1 1.2 1 1 1.476 L5 81.3333- 0.09 0.98 A 1 1.2 42.17 1 1 7.770 0.57 122.02 C 76.6667 B 1 1.2 1 1 7.770 C 1 1.2 1 1, 7.770 L6 76.6667- 0.06 0.30 A 1 1.2 41.73 1 1 5.378 0.39 124.95 C 73.5787 B 1 1.2 1 1 5.378 C 1 1.2 1 1 5.378 L7 73.5787- 0.17 1.47 A 1 1.2 41.11 1 1 13.070 0.91 127.62 C 66.4167 B 1 1.2 1 1 13.070 C 1 1.2 1 1 13.070 LS 66.4167- 0.17 0.72 A 1 1.2 40.25 1 1 12.107 0.82 130.96 C 60.1700 B 1 1.2 1 1 12.107 C 1 1.2 1 1 12.107 L9 60.1700- 0.72 3.66 A 1 1.2 37.73 1 1 59.076 3.63 138.40 C 33.9351 B 1 1.2 1 1 59.076 C 1 1.2 1 1 59.076 L10 33.9351- 0.09 1.24 A 1 1.2 34.92 1 1 8.520 0.48 138.60 C 30.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 8.520 C 1 1.2 1 1 8.520 L1130.5000- 0.05 0.33 A 1 1.2 34.31 1 1 4.442 0.25 140.03 C 28.7500 B 1 1.2 1 1 4.442 C 1 1.2 1 1 4.442 L12 28.7500- 0.35 2.63 A 1 1.2 32.33 1 1 33.786 1.74 137.83 C 16.1250 B 1 1.2 1 1 33.786 C 1 1.2 1 1 33.786 L1316.1250- 0.09 0.70 A 1 1.2 29.77 1 1 9.191 0.43 132.88 C 12.8750 B 1 1.2 1 1 9.191 C 1 1.2 1 1 9.191 L1412.8750- 0.13 1.10 A 1 1.2 29.77 1 1 13.797 0.65 135.89 C 8.1250 B 1 1.2 1 1 13797 C 1 1.2 1 1 13.797 L15 8.1250- 0.06 0.50 A 1 1.2 29.77 1 1 6.686 0.31 138.53 C 5.8750 B 1 1.2 1 1 $.686 C 1 1.2 1 1 6.686 L16 5.8750- 0.04 0.31 A 1 1.2 29.77 1 1 4.134 0.19 139.89 C 4.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 4.134 C 1 1.2 1 1 4.134 L17 4.5000- 0.03 0.25 A 1 1.2 29.77 1 1 3.029 0.14 140.79 C 3.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 3.029 C 1 1.2 1. 1 3.029 L18 3.5000- 0.10 0.79' A 1 1.2 29.77 1 1 10.753 0.50 142.48 C 0.0000 B 1 1.2 1 1 10.753 C 1 1.2 1 1 10J53 Sum Weight: 2.50 16.05 OTM, 617.24 12.93 ki -ft tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 • � February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Sfructural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 20 Tower Forces - With Ice - Wind Normal To Face Section Add Self F e CF qz DF DR AE F w Ctrl. Elevation Weight Weight a Face c psf ft K K e ftz K If L1108.5000- 0.84 0.60 A 1 1.2 7.77 1 1 10.244 0.14 17.41 C 100.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 10.244 C 1 1.2 1 1 10.244 L2 100.5000- 0.06 0.04 A 1 1.2' 7.70 1 1 0.692 0.01 18.57 C 100.0000 B 1 1.2 1 1 0.692 C 1 1.2 1 1 0.692 L3100.0000- 2.09 1.27 A 1 1.2 7.54 1 1 30.221 0.38 21.43 C 82.2500 B 1 1.2 1 1 30.221 C 1 1.2 1 1 30.221 L4 82.2500- 0.11 0.13 A 1 1.2 7.38 1 1 1.727 0.03 29.10 C 81.3333 B 1 1.2 1 1 1.727 C 1 1.2 1 1 1.727 L5 81.3333- 0.58 1.18 A 1 1.2 7.32 1 1 9.043 0.14 29.39 C 76.6667 B 1 1.2 1 1 9.043 C 1 1.2 1 1 9.043 L6 76.6667- 0.39 0.44 A 1 1.2 7.25 1 1 6.216 0.09 29.77 C � 73.5787 B 1 1.2 1 1 6.216 C 1 1.2 1 1 6.216 L7 73.5787- 0.93 1.80 A 1 1.2 7.14 1 1 15.000 0.22 30.06 C 66.4167 B 1 1.2 1 1 15.000 C 1 1.2 1 1 15.000 L8 66.4167- 0.82 1.02 A 1 1.2 6.99 1 t 13.774 0.19 30.39 C 60.1700 B 1 1.2 1 1 13.774 C 1 1.2 1 1 13.774 L9 60.1700- 3.33 5.07 A 1 1.2 6.55 1 1 65.864 0.81 30.99 C 33.9351 B 1 1.2 1 1 65.864 C 1 1.2 1 1 65.864 L10 33.9351- 0.44 1.43 A 1 1.2 6.06 1 1 9.409 0.10 30.50 C 30.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 9.409 C 1 1.2 1 1 9.409 L1130.5000- 0.22 0.43 A 1 1.2 5.96 1 1 4.875 0.05 30.36 C 28.7500 B 1 1.2 1 1 4.875 C 1 1.2 1 1 4.875 L12 28.7500- 1.53 3.37 A 1 1.2 5.61 1 1 36.821 0.37 29.47 C 16.1250 B 1 1.2 1 1 36.821 C 1 1.2 1 1 36.821 L1316.1250- 0.38 0.89 A 1 1.2 5.17 1 1 9.940 0.09 27.96 C 12.8750 B 1 1.2 1 1 9.940 C 1 1.2 1 1 9.940 L1412.8750- 0.53 1.38 A 1 1.2 5.17 1 1 14.856 0.13 28.32 C 8.1250 B 1 1.2 1 1 14.856 C 1 1.2 1 1 14.856 L15 8.1250- 0.24 0.62 A 1 1.2 5.17 T 1 7.168 0.06 28.59 C 5.8750 B 1 1.2 1 1 7.168 C 1 1.2 1 1 7.168 L16 5.8750- 0.14 0.38 A 1 1.2 5.17 1 1 4.420 0.04 28.70 C 4.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 4.420 C 1 1.2 1 1 4.420 L17 4.5000- 0.10 0.31 A 1 1.2 5.17 1 1 3.232 0.03 28.74 C 3.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 3.232 C 1 1.2 1 1 3.232 L18 3.5000- 0.32 0.97 A 1 1.2 5.17 1 1 11.405 0.10 28.69 C 0.0000 B 1 1.2 1 1 11.405 C 1 1.2 1 1 11.405 Sum Weight: 13.04 21.33 OTM 151.79 2.99 ki -ft tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 • • February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 21 Tower Forces - With Ice - Wind 60 To Face Section Add Self F e CF q� DF DR AE F w Ctrl. Elevation Weight Weight a Face c psf ft K K e � K �f L1108.5000- 0.84' 0.60 A 1 1.2 7.77 1 1 10.244 0.14 17.41 C 100.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 10.244 C 1 1.2 1 1 10.244 L2100.5000- 0.06 0.04 A 1 1.2 7.70 1 1 0.692 0.01 18.57 C 100.0000 B 1 1.2 1 1 0.692 C 1 1.2 1 1 0.692 L3100.0000- 2.09 1.27 A 1 1.2 7.54 1 1 30.221 0.38 21.43 C 82.2500 B 1 1.2 1 1 30.221 C 1 1.2 1 1 30.221 L4 82.2500- 0.11 0.13 A 1 1.2 7.38 1 1 1.727 0.03 29.10 C 81.3333 B 1 1.2 1 1 1.727 C 1 1.2 1 1 1.727 L5 81.3333- 0.58' 1.18 A 1 1.2 7.32 1 1 9.043 0.14 29.39 C 76.6667 B 1 12 1 1 9.043 C 1 1.2 1 1 9.043 L6 76.6667- 0.39 0.44 A 1 1.2 7.25 1 1 6.216 0.09 29.77 C 73.5787 B 1 1.2 1 1 6.216 C 1 1.2 1 1 6.216 L7 73.5787- 0.93 1.80 A 1 1.2 7.14 1 1 15.000 0.22 30.06 C 66.4167 B 1 1.2 1 1 15.000 C 1 1.2 1 1 15.000 L8 66.4167- 0.82 1.02 A 1 1.2 6.99 1 1 13.774 0.19 30.39 C 60.1700 B 1 1.2 1 1 13.774 C 1 1.2 1 1 13.774 L9 60.1700- 3.33 5.07 A 1 1.2 6.55 1 1 65.864 0.81 30.99 C 33.9351 B 1 1.2 1 1 65.864 C 1 1.2 1 1 65.864 L10 33.9351- 0.44 1.43 A 1 1.2 6.06 1 1 9.409 0.10 30.50 C 30.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 9.409 C 1 1.2 1 1 9.409 L1130.5000- 0.22 0.43 A 1 1.2 5.96 1 1 4.875 0.05 30.36 C 28.7500 B 1 12 1 1 4.875 C 1 1.2 1 1 4.875 L12 28.7500- 1.53 3.37 A 1 1.2 5.61 1 1 36.821 0.37 29.47 C 16.1250 B 1 1.2 1 1 36.821 C 1 1.2 1 1 36.821 L1316.1250- 0.38 0.89 A 1 1.2 5.17 1 1 9.940 0.09 27.96 C 12.8750 B 1 1.2 1 1 9.940 C 1 1.2 1 1 9.940 L1412.8750- 0.53 1.38 A 1 1.2 5.17 1 1 14.856 0.13 28.32 C 8.1250 B 1 1.2 1 1 14.856 C 1 1.2 1 1 14.856 L15 8.1250- 0.24 0.62 A 1 1.2 5.17 1 1 7.168 0.06 28.59 C 5.8750 B 1 1.2 1 1 7.168 C T 1.2 1 1 7.168 L16 5.8750- 0.14 0.38 A 1 1.2 5.17 1 1 4.420 0.04 28.70 C 4.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 4.420 C 1 1.2 1 1 4.420 L17 4.5000- 0.10 0.31 A 1 1.2 5.17 1 1 3.232 0.03 28.74 C 3.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 3.232 C 1 1.2 1 1 3.232 L18 3.5000- 0.32 0.97 A 1 1.2 5.17 1 1 11.405 0.10 28.69 C 0.0000 B 1 1.2 1 1 11.405 C 1 1.2 1 1 11.405 Sum Weight: 13.04 21.33 OTM 151.79 2.99 ki -ft tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 . • • February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Exfension Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 22 Tower Forces - With Ice - Wind 90 To Face Section Add Self F e CF q� DF �R AE F w Ctrl. Elevation Weight Weight a Face � psf ft K K e ft� K If L1108.5000- 0.84 0.60 A 1 1.2 7.77 1 1 10.244 0.14 17.41 C 100.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 10.244 C 1 1.2 1 1 10.244 L2100.5000- 0.06 0.04 A 1 1.2 7.70 1 1 0.692 0.01 18.57 C 100.0000' B 1 1.2 1 1 0.692 C 1 1.2 1 1 0.692 L3100.0000- 2.09 1.27 A 1 1.2 7.54 t 1 30.221 0.38 21.43 C 82.2500 B 1 1.2 1 1 30.221 C 1 1.2 1 1 30.221 L4 82.2500- 0.11 0.13 A 1 1.2 7.38 1 1 1.727 0.03 29.10 C 81.3333 B 1 1.2 1 1 1.727 C 1 1.2 1 1 1.727 L5 81.3333- 0.58 1.18 A 1 1.2 7.32 i 1 9.043 0.14 29.39 C 76.6667 B 1 1.2 1 1 9.043 C 1 1.2 1 1 9.043 L6 76.6667- 0.39 0.44 A 1 1.2 7.25 1 1 6.216 0.09 29.77 C 73.5787 B 1 1.2 1 1 6.216 C 1 1.2 1 1 6.216 L7 73.5787- 0.93 1.80 A 1 1.2 7.14 1 1 15.000 0.22 30.06 C 66.4167 B 1 1.2 1 1 15.000 C 1 1.2 1 1 15.000 L8 66.4167- 0.82 1.02 A 1 1.2 6.99 1 1 13.774 0.19 30.39 C 60.1700 B 1 1.2 1 1 13.774 C 1 1.2 1 1 13J74 L9 60.1700- 3.33 5.07 A 1 1.2 6.55 1 1 65.864 0.81 30.99 C 33.9351 B 1 1.2 1 1 65.864 C 1 1.2 1 1 65.864 L10 33.9351- 0.44 1.43 A 1 1.2 6.06 1 1 9.409 0.10 30.50 C 30.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 9.409 C 1 1.2 1 1 9.409 L11 30.5000- 022 0.43 . A 1 1.2 5.96 1 1 4.875 0.05 30.36 C 28.7500 B 1 1.2 1 1 4.875 C 1 1.2 1 1 4.875 L12 28.7500- 1.53 3.37 A 1 1.2 5.61 1 1 36.821 0.37 29.47 C 16.1250 B 1 1.2 1 1 36.821 C 1 1.2 1 1 36.821 L1316.1250- 0.38 0.89 A 1 1.2 5.17 1 1 9.940 0.09 27.96 C 12.8750 B 1 1.2 1 1 9.940 C 1 1.2 1 1 9.940 L1412.8750- 0.53 1.38 A 1 1.2 5.17 1 1 14.856 0.13 28.32 C 8.1250 B 1 1.2 1 1 14.856 C 1 1.2 1 1 14:856 L15 8.1250- 0.24 0.62 A 1 1.2 5.17 1 1 7.168 0.06 28.59 C 5.8750 B 1 1.2 1 1 7.168 C 1 1.2 1 1 7.168 t16 5.8750- 0.14 0.38 A 1 1.2 5.17 1 1 4.420 0.04 28.70 C 4.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 4.420 C 1 1.2 1 1 4.420 L17 4.5000- 0.10 0.31 A 1 1.2 5.17 1 1 3.232 0.03 28J4 C 3.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 3.232 C 1 1.2 1 1 3.232 L18 3.5000- 0.32 0.97 A 1 1.2 5.17 1 1 11.405 0.10 28.69 C 0.0000 B 1 1.2 1 1 11.405 C 1 1.2 1 9 11.405 Sum Weight: 13.04 21.33 OTM 151.79 2.99 ki -ft tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 • • February 14, 2014 1 DO Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293, Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 23 Tower Forces - Service - Wind Normal To Face Section Add Self F e CF q� DF DR Ae F w Ctr1. Elevation Weight Weight a Face c psf ft K K e ft� K If L1108.5000- 0.07 0.37 A 1 0.698 10.01 1 1 8.000 0.08 9.73 C 100.5000 B 1 0.698 1 1 8.000 C 1 0.698 1 1 8.000 L2100.5000- 0.01 0.03 A 1 0.689 9.92 1 1 0.552 0.01 10.46 C 100.0000 B 1 0.689 1 1 0.552 C 1 0.689 1 1 0.552 L3100.0000- 0.25 0.60 A 1 1.058 9.71 1 1 25.311 0.32 18.29 C 82.2500 B 1 1.058 1 1 25.311 C 1 1.058 1 1 25.311 L4 82.2500- 0.02 0.09 A 1 1.2 9.50 1 1 1.476 0.02 26.80 C 81.3333 B 1 1.2 1 1 1.476 C 1 1.2 1 1 1.476 L5 81.3333- 0.09 0.98 A 1 1.2 9.43 1 1 7.770 0.13 27.29 C 76.6667 B 1 1.2 1 1 7.770 C 1 1.2 1 1 7.770 L6 76.6667- 0.06 0.30 A 1 1.2 9.33 1 1 5.378 0.09 27.95 C 73.5787 B 1 1.2 1 1 5.378 C 1 1.2 1 1 5.378 L7 73.5787- 0.17 1.47 A 1 12 9.20 1 1 13.070 0.20 28.55 C 66.4167 B 1 1.2 1 1 13.070 C 1 12 1 1 13.070 L8 66.4167- 0.17 0.72 A 1 1.2 9.00 1 1 12.107 0.18 29.29 C 60.1700 B 1 1.2 1 1 12.107 C 1 1.2 1 1 12.107 L9 60.1700- 0.72 3.66 A 1 1.2 8.44 1 1 59.076 0.81 30.96 C 33.9351 B 1 1.2 1 1 59.076 C 1 1.2 1 1 59.076 L10 33.9351- 0.09 124 A 1 1.2 7.81 1 1 8.520 0.11 31.00 C 30.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 8.520 C 1 1.2 1 1 8.520 L1130.5000- 0.05 0.33 A 1 1.2 7.67 1 1 4.442 0.05 31.32 C 28.7500 B 1 1.2 1 1 4.442 C 1 1.2 1 1 4.442 L12 28.7500- 0.35 2.63 A 1 1.2 7.23 1 1 33.786 0.39 30.83 C 16.1250 B 1 1.2 1 1 33.786 C 1 1.2 1 1 33.786 L1316.1250- 0.09 OJO A 1 1.2 6.66 1 1 9.191 0.10 29.72 C 12.8750 B 1 1.2 1 1 9.191 C 1 1.2 1 1 9.191 L1412.8750- 0.13 1.10 A 1 1.2 6.66 1 1 13.797 0.14 30.40 C 8.1250 B 1 1.2 1 1 13.797 C 1 1.2 1 1 13J97 L15 8.1250- 0.06 0.50 A 1 1.2 6.66 1 1 6.686 0.07 30.99 C 5.8750 B 1 1.2 1 1 6.686 C 1 1.2 1 1 6.686 L16 5.8750- 0.04 0.31 A 1 1.2 6.66 1 1 4.134 0.04 31.29 C 4.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 4.134 C 1 1.2 1 1 4.134 L17 4.5000- 0.03 0.25 A 1 1.2 6.66 1 1 3.029 0.03 31.49 C 3.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 3.029 C 1 1.2 1 1 3.029 L18 3.5000- 0.10 OJ9 A 1 1.2 6.66 1 1 10J53 0.11 31.87 C 0.0000 B 1 1.2 1 1 10.753 C 1 1.2 1 1 10]53 Sum Weight: 2.50 16.05 OTM 138.07 2.89 ki -ft tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 • . February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293, Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 24 Tower Forces - Service - Wind 60 To Face Section Add Self F e CF 4� DF DR Ae F w Ctrl. Elevation Weight Weight a Face c psf ft K K e ft2 K If L1108.5000- 0.07 -0.37 A 1 0.698 10.01 1 1 8.000 0.08 9.73 C 100.5000 B 1 0.698 1 1 8.000 C 1 0.698 1 1 8.000 L2100.5000- 0.01 0.03 A 1 0.689 9.92 1 1 0.552 0.01 10.46 C 100.0000 B 1 0.689 1 1 0.552 C 1 0.689 1 1 0.552 L3100.0000- 0.25 0.60 A 1 1.058 9.71 1 1 25.311 0.32 18.29 C 82.2500 B 1 1.058 1 1 25.311 C 1 1.058 1 1 25.311 L4 82.2500- 0.02 0.09 A 1 1.2 9.50 1 1 1.476 0.02 26.80 C 81.3333 B 1 12 1 1 1.476 C T 1.2 1 1 1.476 � L5 81.3333- 0.09 0.98 A 1 1.2 9.43 1 1 7.770 0.13 27.29 C 76.6667 B 1 1.2 1 1 7.770 C 1 L2 1 1 7.770 L6 76.6667- 0.06 0.30 A 1 1.2 9.33 1 1 5.378 0.09 27.95 C 73.5787 B 1 1.2 1 1 5.378 C 1 1.2 1 1 5.378 L7 73.5787- 0.17 1.47 A 1 1.2 9.20 1 1 13.070 0.20 28.55 C 66.4167 B 1 12 1 1 13.070 C 1 1.2 1 1 13.070 L8 66.4167- 0.17 0.72 A 1 1.2 9.00 1 1 12.107 0.18 29.29 C 60.1700 B 1 1.2 1 1 12.107 C 1 1.2 1 1 12.107 L9 60.1700- 0.72 3.66 A 1 1.2 8.44 1 1 59.076 0.81 30.96 C 33.9351 B 1 1.2 1 1 59.076 C 1 1.2 1 1 59.076 L10 33.9351- 0.09 1.24 A 1 1.2 7.81 1 1 8.520 0.11 31.00 C 30.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 8.520 C 1 1.2 1 1 8.520 L1130.5000- 0.05 0.33 A 1 1.2 7.67 1 1 4.442 0.05 31.32 C 28.7500 B 1 1.2 1 1 4.442 C 1 1.2 1 1 4.442 L12 28.7500- 0.35 2.63 A 1 1.2 7.23 1 1 33.786 0.39 30.83 C 16.1250 B 1 1.2 1 1 33.786 C 1 1.2 1 1 33J86 L1316.1250- 0.09 0.70 A 1 1.2 6.66 1 1 9.191 0.10 29.72 C 12.8750 B 1 1.2 1 1 9.191 C 1 1.2 1 1 9.191 L1412.8750- 0.13 1.10 A 1 1.2 6.66 1 1 13.797 0.14 30.40 C 8.1250 B 1 1.2 1 1 13.797 C 1 1.2 1 1 13.797 L15 8.1250- 0.06 0.50 A 1 1.2 6.66 1 1 6.686 0.07 30.99 C 5.8750 B 1 1.2 1 1 6.686 C 1 1.2 1 1 6.686 L16 5.8750- 0.04 0.31 A 1 1.2 6.66 1 1 4.134 0.04 31.29 C 4.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 4.134 C 1 1.2 1 1 4.134 L17 4.5000- 0.03 0.25 A 1 1.2 6.66 1 1 3.029 0.03 31.49 C 3.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 3.029 C 1 1.2 1 1 3.029 L18 3.5000- 0.10 0.79 A 1 1.2 6.66 1 1 10.753 0.11 31.87 C 0.0000 B 1 1.2 1 1 10.753 C 1 1.2 1 1 10.753 Sum Weight: 2.50 16.05 OTM 138.07 2.89 ki -ft tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 � • February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Sfructural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 25 Tower Forces - Service - Wind 90 To Face Section Add Self F e CF qZ DF DR AE F w Ctri. Elevation Weight Weight a Face c psf ft K K e � K �f L1108.5000- 0.07 0.37 A 1 0.698 10.01 1 1 8.000 0.08 9J3 C 100.5000 B 1 0:698 1 1 8.000 C 1 0.698 1 1 8.000 L2100.5000- 0.01 0.03 A 1 0.689 9.92 1 1 0.552 0.01 10.46 C 100.0000 B 1 0.689 1 1 0.552 C 1 0.689 1 1 0.552, L3100.0000- 0.25 0.60 A 1 1.058 9.71 1 1 25.311 0.32 18.29 C 82.2500 B 1 1.058 1 1 25.311 C 1 1.058 1 1 25.311 L4 82.2500- 0.02 0.09 A 1 1.2 9.50 1 1 1.476 0.02 26.80 C 81.3333 B 1 1.2 1 1 1.476 C 1 1.2 1 1 1.476 L5 81.3333- 0.09 0.98 A 1 1.2 9.43 1 1 7.770 0.13 27.29 C 76.6667 B 1 1.2 1 1 7.770 C 1 1.2 1 1 7.770 L6 76.6667- 0.06 0.30 A 1 1.2 9.33 1 1 5.378 0.09 27.95 C 73.5787 B 1 1.2 1 1 5.378 C 1 1.2 1 1 5.378 L7 73.5787- 0.17 1.47 A 1 1.2 9.20 1 1 13.070 0.20 28.55 C 66.4167 B 1• 1.2 1 1 13.070 C 1 1.2 1 1 13.070 L8 66.4167- 0.17 0.72 A 1 1.2 9.00 1 1 12.107 0.18 29.29 C 60.1700 B 1 1.2 1 1 12.107 C 1 1.2 1 1 12.107 L9 60.1700- 0.72 3.66 A 1 L2 8.44 1 1 59.076 0.81 30.96 C 33.9351 B 1 1.2 1 1 59.076 C 1 1.2 1 1 59.076 L10 33.9351- 0.09 1.24 A 1 1.2 7.81 1 1 8.520 0.11 31.00 C 30.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 8.520 C 1 1.2 1 1 8.520 L1130.5000- 0.05 0.33 A 1 1.2 7.67 1 1 4.442 0.05 31.32 C 28.7500 B 1 1.2 1 1 4.442 C 1 1.2 1 1 4.442 L12 28.7500- 0.35 2.63 A 1 1.2 7.23 1 1 33.786 0.39 30.83 C 16.1250 B 1 1.2 1 1 33.786 C 1 1.2 1 1 33786 L1316.1250- 0.09 0.70 A 1 1.2 6.66 1 1 9.191 0.10 29.72 C 12.8750 B 1 1.2 1 1 9.191 C 1 1.2 1 1 9.191 L1412.8750- 0.13 1.10 A 1 1.2 6.66 1 1 13.797 0.14 30.40 C 8.1250 B 1 1.2 1 1 13.797 C 1 1.2 1 1 13.797 L15 8.1250- 0.06 0.50 A 1 L2 6.66 1 1 6.686. 0.07 30.99 C 5.8750 B 1 1.2 1 1 6.686 C 1 1.2 1 1 6.686 L16 5.8750- 0.04 0.31 A 1 1.2 6.66 1 1 4.134 0.04 31.29 C 4.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 4.134 C 1 1.2 1 1 4.134 L17 4.5000- 0.03 0.25 A 1 12 6.66 1 1 3.029 0.03 31.49 C 3.5000 B 1 1.2 1 1 3.029 C 1 1.2 1 1 3.029 L18 3.5000- 0.10 0.79 A 1 1.2 6.66 1 1 10.753 0.11 31.87 C 0.0000 B 1 1.2 1 1 10J53 C 1 1.2 1 1 10.753 Sum Weight: 2.50 16.05 07M 138.07 2.89 ki -ft Load Combinations Comb. Description No. 1 Dead Only � 2 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 0 deg-No Ice tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 . • • February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Sfructural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 26 Comb. Description No. -------------- ---___..._._._._.___.-----._..__�----._-- -----......._..------_-------------- 3 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 0 deg-No Ice 4 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 30 deg-No Ice 5 0:9 Dead+1.6 Wind 30 deg-No Ice 6 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 60 deg-No Ice 7 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 60 deg-No Ice 8 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 90 deg-No Ice 9 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 90 deg-No Ice 10 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 120 deg-No Ice 11 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 120 deg-No Ice 12 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 150 deg-No Ice 13 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 150 deg-No Ice 14 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 180 deg-No Ice 15 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 180 deg-No Ice 16 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 210 deg-No Ice 17 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 210 deg-No Ice 18 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 240 deg-No Ice 19 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 240 deg-No Ice 20 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 270 deg-No Ice 21 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 270 deg-No Ice 22 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 300 deg-No Ice 23 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 300 deg-No Ice 24 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 330 deg-No Ice 25 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 330 deg-No Ice 2fi 1.2 Dead+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 27 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 0 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 28 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 30 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 29 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 60 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 30 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 90 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 31 1.2 Dead+1.O Wind 120 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 32 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 150 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 33 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 180 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 34 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 210 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 35 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 240 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 36 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 270 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 37 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 300 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 38 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 330 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 39 Dead+Wind 0 deg-Service 40 Dead+Wind 30 deg-Service 41 Dead+Wind 60 deg-Service 42 Dead+Wind 90 deg-Service 43 Dead+Wind 120 deg-Service 44 Dead+Wind 150 deg-Service 45 Dead+Wind 180 deg-Service 46 Dead+Wind 210 deg-Service 47 Dead+Wind 240 deg-Service 48 Dead+Wind 270 deg-Service 49 Dead+Wind 300 deg-Service 50 Dead+Wind 330 de -Service Maximum Member Forces Sectio Elevation Component Condition Gov. Axial Major,4uis MinorAxis n ft Type Load Moment Moment No. Comb. K kip-ft kip-ft � L1 108.5- Pole Max Tension 26 0.00 -0.00 0.00 100.5 Max.Compression 26 -8.78 0.39 -0.23 Max.Mx 20 -1.96 40.88 -0.01 Max.My 14 -1.97 0.02 -40.86 Max.Vy 20 -8.95 40.88 -0.01 Max.Vx 2 -8.95 0.05 40.83 Max.Torque 24 0.06 L2 100.5-100 Pole Max Tension 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 Max.Compression 26 -8.88 0.42 -0.25 Max.Mx 20 -2.00 45.37 -0.01 Max.My 14 -2.01 0.02 -45.35 Max.Vy 20 -9.00 45.37 -0.01 Max.Vx 2 -9.00 0.06 45.31 tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 • • February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 27 Sectio Elevation Component Condition Gov. Axial MajorAxis MinorAxis n ft Type Load Moment Moment No. Comb. K kiP_.-�_.._..__._..._...k!P..._n..._........_. _..._..-----._...._......---...._.......-----.._.........______........_.._._......_...._...._...._.._.------.._........---._.._._..._..._.............._._.._....__.......---........----_._._...._.�._.. Max.Torque 24 0.07 L3 100-82.25 Pole Max Tension 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 Max.Compression 26 -16.59 1.38 -1.25 Max.Mx 20 -4.42 256.80 3.39 Max.My 2 -4.44 5.89 255.34 Max.Vy 20 -15.35 256.80 3.39 Max.Vx 2 -15.28 5.89 255.34 Max.Torque 8 -0.62 L4 82.25- Pole Max Tension 1 0.00 0.00 0:00 81.3333 Max.Compression 26 -16.85 1.47 -1.30 Max.Mx 20 -4.56 270.95 3.57 Max.My 2 -4.57 6.19 269.42 Max.Vy 20 -15.53 270.95 3.57 Max.Vx 2 -15.46 6.19 269.42 Max.Torque 8 -0.64 L5 81.3333- Pole Max Tension 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 76.6667 Max.Compression 26 -24.29 1.89 -1.55 Max.Mx 20 -7.20 362.38 4.50 Max.My 2 -7.22 7.78 360.45 Max.Vy 20 -22.31 362.38 4.50 Max.Vx 2 -22.24 7.78 360.45 Max.Torque 8 -0.73 L6 76.6667- Pole Max Tension 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 73.5787 Max.Compression 26 -25.20 2.19 -1.73 Max.Mx 20 -7.66 43226 5.12 Max.My 2 -7.68 8.83 430.07 Max.Vy 20 -22.94 432.26 5.12 Max.Vx 2 -22.87 8.83 430.07 Max.Torque 8 -079 L7 73.5787- Pole Max Tension 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.4167 Max.Compression 26 -34.00 3.39 -2.42 Max.Mx 20 -11.25 622.83 6.53 Max.My 2 -11.27 11.34 619.85 Max.Vy 20 -30.24 622.83 6.53 Max.Vx 2 -30.17 11.34 619.85 Max.Torque 25 1.63 L8 66.4167- Pole Max Tension 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.17 Max.Compression 26 -36.02 4.05 -2.82 Max.Mx 20 -12.51 815.76 7.79 Max.My 2 -12.52 13.51 812.23 Max.Vy 20 -31.53 815.76 7.79 Max.Vx 2 31.46 13.51 812.23 Max.Torque . 25 1.89 L9 60.17- Pole Max Tension 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.9351 Max.Compression 26 -43.76 6.60 -4.30 Max.Mx 20 -17.82 1561.64 12.20 Max.My 2 -17.83 21.17 1556.12 Max.Vy 20 -36.06 1561.64 12.20 Max.Vx 2 -35.98 21.17 1556.12 Max.Torque 25 2.86 L10 33.9351 - Pole Max Tension 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.5 Max.Compression 26 -47.65 7.49 -4.82 Max.Mx 20 -20.59 1841.09 13.69 Max.My 2 -20.59 23.76 1834.88 Max.Vy 20 -37.75 1841.09 13.69 Max.Vx 2 -37.68 23.76 1834.88 Max.Torque 25 3.22 L11 30.5-28.75 Pole Max Tension 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 Max.Compression 26 -48.50 7.70 -4.89 Max.Mx 20 -21.18 1907.70 14.04 Max.My 2 -21.19 24.36 1901.33 Max.Vy 20 -38.31 1907.70 14.04 tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 . • • February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 28 Sectio Elevation Component Condition Gov. Axial MajorAxis MinorAxis n ft Type Load Moment Moment No. _Comb:...........................:K...................................._kiP.-�......__..._._..._._._kip-ft_._...._... ----...._..._...__.._..._...------------._._...._..------------........_....._._.......---.._..---._.........._. Max.Vx 2 38.24 24.36 1901.33 Max.Torque 25 3.29 L12 28.75- Pole Max Tension 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.125 Max.Compression 26 -54.00 9.26 -5.79 Max.Mx 20 -25.42 2406.55 16.50 Max.My 2 -25.43 28.67 2399.02 Max.Vy 20 -40.76 2406.55 16.50 Max.Vx 2 -40.69 28.67 2399.02 Max.Torque 25 3.90 L13 16.125- Pole Max Tension 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.875 Max.Compression 26 -55.43 9.64 -6.01 Max.Mx 20 -26.55 2539.96 17.13 Max.My 2 -26.56 29.77 2532.13 Max.Vy 20 -41.35 2539.96 17.13 Max.Vx 2 -41.28 29.77 2532.13 Max.Torque 25 4.05 L14 12.875- Pole Max Tension 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.125 Max.Compression 26 -57.58 10.19 -6.33 Max.Mx 20 -28.28 2738.41 18.04 Max.My 2 -2829 31.38 2730.13 Max.Vy 20 -42.23 2738.41 18.04 Max.Vx 2 -42.16 31.38 2730.13 Max.Torque 25 4.28 L15 8.125- Pole Max Tension 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.875 Max.Compression 26 -58.56 10.44 -6.47 Max.Mx 20 -29.09 2833.86 18.47 Max.My 2 -29.09 32.13 2825.37 Max.Vy 20 -42.64 2833.86 18.47 Max.Vx 2 -42.57 32.13 2825.37 Max.Torque 25 4.39 L16 5.875-4.5 Pole Max Tension 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 Max.Compression 26 -59.15 10.59 -6.56 Max.Mx 20 -29.58 2892.65 18.73 Max.My 2 -29.58 32.59 2884.03 Max.Vy 20 -42.90 2892.65 18.73 Max.Vx 2 -42.83 32.59 2884.03 Max.Torque 25 4.46 L17 4.5-3.5 Pole Max Tension 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 Max.Compression 26 -59.61 10.69 -6.62 Max.Mx 20 -29.98 2935.62 18.93 Max.My 2 -29.98 32.93 2926.92 Max.Vy 20 -43.08 2935.62 18.93 Max.Vx 2 -43.00 32.93 2926.92 Max.Torque 25 4.51 L18 3.5-0 Pole Max Tension 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 Max.Compression 26 -61.08 11.03 -6.82 Max.Mx 20 -31.25 3087.50 19.59 Max.My 2 -31.25 34.10 3078.46 Max.Vy 20 -43.73 3087.50 19.59 Max.Vx 2 -43.66 34.10 3078.46 Max.Torque 25 4.69 Maximum Reactions Location Condition Gov. Vertical Honzontal,X Honzontal,Z Load K K K Comb. _. ---....--- Pole Max.Vert 26 61.08 -0.00 0.00 Max.Hr 21 23.47 43.70 0.20 Max.H� 3 23.47 0.32 43.63 Max.M, 2 3078.46 0.32 43.63 Max.Mz 8 3073.95 -43.59 -0.01 tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 � ! • r February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 29 Location Condition Gov. Vertical Horizontal,X Honzontal,Z Load K K K Comb. _-..__......................_......._._....------.._....-----......._.._.._.._......._..._..----..._._...._._..---.-....._.................._..................................................................................... _.._...... Max.Torsion 25 4.69 22.02 37.75 Min.Vert 21 23.47 43.70 0.20 Min.H, 8 31.29 -43.59 -0.01 Min.H� 15 23.47 -0.04 -43.53 Min.M, 14 -3068.64 -0.04 -43.53 Min.M= 20 -3087.50 43.70 0.20 Min.Torsion 13 -4.15 -21.81 -37.75 Tower Mast Reaction Summa Load Vertical Shearx ShearZ Overtuming Overtuming Torque Combination Moment, M. Moment,MZ K K K kip-fr kip-ft kip-ft Dead Only 26.08 -0.00 0.00 0.63 0.85 0.00 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind�deg- 31.29 -0.32 -43.63 -3078.46 34.10 -3.81 No Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 0 deg- 23.47 -0.32 -43.63 -3055.10 33.53 -3.81 No Ice 1.2 Dead+i.6 Wind 30 deg- 31.29 21.73 -37.64 -2650.79 -1530.19 -1.89 No Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 30 deg- 23.47 21.73 -37.64 -2630.71 -1518.74 -1.90 No Ice 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 60 deg- 31.29 37.72 -21.73 -1530.06 -2658.89 0.55 No Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 60 deg- 23.47 37.72 -21.73 -1518.55 -2638.80 0.54 No Ice 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 90 deg- 31.29 43.59 0.01 1.99 -3073.95 2.78 No Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 90 deg- 23.47 43.59 0.01 1.78 -3050.65 2.77 No Ice 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 120 deg 31.29 37.79 21.82 1540.66 -2666.15 4.00 -No Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 120 deg 23.47 37.79 21.82 1528.68 -2646.00 4.00 -No Ice 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 150 deg 31.29 21.81 37.75 2663.22 -t537.55 4.15 -No Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 150 deg 23.47 21.8'I 37.75 2642.64 -1526.03 4.15 -No Ice 12 Dead+1.6 Wind 18�deg 31.29 0.04 43.53 3069.64 -3.20 3.45 -No ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 180 deg 23.47 0.04 43.53 3046.00 -3.43 3.45 -No Ice 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 210 deg 31.29 -21.73 37.64 2652.64 1531 J5 1.89 -No Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 210 deg 23.47 -21.73 37.64 2632.15 1519.78 1.90 -No Ice 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 240 deg 31.29 -37.95 21.54 1511.78 2684.31 -0.19 -No Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 240 deg 23.47 -37.95 21.54 1500.05 2663.48 -0.18 -No Ice 12 Dead+1.6 Wind 270 deg 31.29 -43.70 -0.20 -19.59 3087.50 -2.23 -No Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 270 deg 23.47 -43.70 -0.20 -19.60 3063.68 -223 -No Ice 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 300 deg 31.29 -37.90 -21.88 -1545.37 2679.02 -4.00 -No Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 300 deg 23.47 -37.90 -21.88 -1533.72 2658.24 -4.00 -No Ice 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 330 deg 31.29 -22.02 -37.75 -2662.25 1562.03 -4.69 -No Ice 0.9 Dead+1:6 Wind 330 deg 23.47 -22.02 -37.75 -2642.07 1549.78 -4.69 -No Ice 1.2 Dead+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 61.08 0.00 -0.00 6.82 11.03 -0.00 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 0 61.08 -0.04 -7.19 -551.25 16.00 -0.82 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 30 61.08 3.58 -6.20 -474.23 -266.70 -0.43 tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 • � � February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Structural Analysis CC/BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 30 Load Vertical Shearx Shear� Overtuming Overtuming Torque Combination Moment,Mx Moment,M� K _K...............__............----K._............_......_............_kip.-�_..._....._............................k�P._-ft.........._......................_...._kip.-ft...._..._..... ---.......-----._._.._....._..._....---._...._.__...._._..__........_.........._..._.........-----..........._.._............. deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 60 61.08 6.22 -3.58 -270.89 -471.22 0.08 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 90 61.08 7.18 0.00 7.05 -546.38 0.56 deg+1.01ce+1.0 Temp 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 120 61.08 6.23 3.59 285.97 -472.30 0.85 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 150 61.08 3.59 6.22 489.58 -267.79 0.92 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 180 61.08 0.01 7.17 563.46 10.49 0.77 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 210 61.08 -3.58 6.21 488.01 288.85 0.43 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 240 61.08 -6.25 3.56 281.70 496.90 -0.03 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 270 61.08 -7.20 -0.03 3.86 570.35 -0.49 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 300 61.08 -6.24 -3.60 -273.16 496.14 -0.86 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 12 Dead+1.0 Wind 330 61.08 -3.62 -6.22 -475.94 293.33 -1.00 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp Dead+Wind 0 deg-Service 26.08 -0.04 -6.10 -428.71 5.48 -0.05 Dead+Wind 30 deg-Service 26.08 3.04 -5.26 -369.06 -212.63 0.01 Dead+Wind 60 deg-Service 26.08 5.27 -3.04 -212.80 -370.01 0.08 Dead+Wind 90 deg-Service 26.08 6.09 0.00 0.82 -427.89 0.11 Dead+Wind 120 deg- 26.08 5.28 3.05 215.36 -371.03 0.08 Service Dead+Wind 150 deg- 26.08 3.05 5.28 371.88 -213.66 0.03 Service Dead+Wind 180 deg- 26.08 0.01 . 6.09 428.56 0.28 0.00 Service Dead+Wind 210 deg- 26.08 -3.04 5.26 370.40 214.30 -0.01 Service Dead+Wind 240 deg- 26.08 -5.30 3.01 211.33 375.01 -0.03 Service Dead+Wind 270 deg- 26.08 -6.11 -0.03 -2.19 431.28 -0.04 Service Dead+Wind 300 deg- 26.08 -5.30 -3.06 -214.95 374.29 -0.08 Service Dead+Wind 330 deg- 26.08 -3.08 -5.28 -370.68 218.53 -0.10 Service Solution Summa Sum of Applied Forces Sum of Reach�ons Load PX PY PZ PX PY PZ %Error Comb. K K K K K K 1 0.00 -26.08 0.00 0.00 26.08 -0.00 0.000% 2 -0.32 -31.29 -43.63 0.32 31.29 43.63 0.001% 3 -0.32. -23.47 -43.63 0.32 23.47 43.63 0.001% 4 21.73 -31.28 -37.64 -21.73 31.29 37.64 0.000% 5 21.73 -23.47 -37.64 -21.73 23.47 37.64 0.000% 6 37.72 -31.29 -21.73 -37.72 31.29 21.73 0.000% 7 37.72 -23.47 -21.73 -37.72 23.47 21.73 0.000% 8 43.59 -31.29 0.01 -43.59 31.29 -0.01 0.001% 9 43.59 -23.47 0.01 -43.59 23.47 -0.01 0.002% 10 37.79 -31.29 21.82 -37.79 31.29 -21.82 0.000% 11 37.79 -23.47 21.82 -37.79 23.47 -21.82 0.000% 12 21.81 -31.29 37.75 -21.81 31.29 -37.75 0.000% 13 21.81 -23.47 37.75 21.81 33.47 -37.75 0.000% 14 0.04 -31.29 43.53 -0:04 31.29 -43.53 0.002% 15 0.04 -23.47 43.53 -0.04 23.47 -43.53 0.002% 16 -21.73 -31.28 37.64 21.73 31.29 -37.64 0.000% 17 -21.73 -23.47 37.64 21.73 23.47 -37.64 0.000°/a 18 -37.95 -31.29 21.54 37.95 31.29 -21.54 0.000% 19 -37.95 -23.47 21:54 37.95 23.47 -21.54 0.000% 20 �3.71 -31.29 -0.20 43.70 31.29 0.20 0.006% tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 • • February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 808579 Projecf Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 31 Sum of Applied Forces Sum of Reactions Load PX PY PZ PX PY PZ %Error Comb. K K K K K K _..__._...__........._..----...._._..............................._.......__....._...------....__--------........_.............._.__...__._._..._.-----..-_..........._.......---..........._.............._....................._._..__......._.._........_....---......_.._.............._.._......__....._....... 21 -43.71 -23.47 -0.20 43.70 23.47 0.20 0.004% 22 -37.90 -31.29 -21.88 37.90 31.29 21.88 0.000% 23 -37.90 -23.47 -21.88 37.90 23.47 21.88 0.000% 24 -22.02 -31.29 -37.75 22.02 31.29 37.75 0.000% 25 -22.02 -23.47 -37.75 22.02 23.47 37.75 0.000% 26 0.00 -61.08 0.00 -0.00 61.08 0.00 0.001% 27 -0.04 -61.08 -7.19 0.04 61.08 7.19 0.001% 28 3.58 -61.08 -6.21 -3.58 61.08 6.20 0.001% 29 6.22 -61.08 -3.58 -6.22 61.08 3.58 0.001% 30 7.18 -61.08 0.00 -7.18 61.08 -0.00 0.001% 31 6.23 -61.08 3.59 -6.23 61.08 -3.59 0.001% 32 3.59 -61.08 6.22 -3.59 61.08 -6.22 0.001°k 33 0.01 -61.08 7.17 -0.01 61.08 -7.17 0.001% 34 -3.58 -61.08 6.21 3.58 61.08 -6.21 0.001% 35 -6.25 -61.08 3.56 6.25 61.08 -3.56 0.001% 36 -7.20 -61.08 -0.03 7.20 61.08 0.03 0.001% 37 -6.24 -61.08 -3.60 6.24 61.08 3.60 0.001% 38 -3.62 -61.08 -6.22 3.62 61.08 6.22 0.001% 39 -0.04 -26.08 -6.10 0.04 26.08 6.10 0.004% 40 3.04 -26.08 -5.26 -3.04 26.08 5.26 0.004% 41 5.27 -26.08 -3.04 -527 26.08 3.04 0.004% 42 6.09 -26.08 0.00 -6.09 26.08 -0.00 0.004% 43 5.28 -26.08 3.05 -5.28 26.08 -3.05 0.004% 44 3.05 -26.08 5.28 -3.05 26.08 -5.28 0.004% 45 0.01 -26.08 6.09 -0.01 26.08 -6.09 0.004% 46 -3.04 -26.08 5.26 3.04 26.08 -5.26 0.004% 47 -5.31 -26.08 3.01 5.30 26.08 -3.01 0.004% 48 -6.11 -26.08 -0.03 6.11 26.08 0.03 0.004% 49 -5.30 -26.08 -3.06 5.30 26.08 3.06 0.004% 50 -3.08 -26.08 -5.28 3.08 26.08 5.28 0.004% Maximum Tower Deflections - Service Wind Section Elevation Horz. Gov. Tilt Twist No. Deflection Load ft in Comb. ° ° _._.._.__..__................_................_..__...........__.............__----..._.._._.................---------.._..__._.._...._-------..__.._.._._...---._....---....._.__....-----....._..._.._._.._._............_........ L1 108.5-100.5 14.80 49 1.25 0.00 L2 100.5-100 12.72 49 1.22 0.00 L3 100-82.25 12.60 49 1.22 0.00 L4 8225-81.3333 8.50 49 0.95 0.00 L5 81.3333- 8.31 49 0.94 0.00 76.6667 L6 76.6667- 7.41 49 0.92 0.00 73.5787 L7 73.5787- 6.83 49 0.88 0.00 66.4167 L8 66.4167-60.17 5.54 49 0.84 0.00 LS 60.17-33.9351 4.50 49 0.75 0.00 L10 38.0645-30.5 1.75 49 0.43 0.00 L11 30.5-28.75 1.12 49 0.36 0.00 L12 28.75-16.125 0.99 49 0.33 0.00 L13 16.125-12.875 0.31 49 0.18 0.00 L14 12.875-8.125 0.20 49 0.15 0.00 L15 8.125-5.875 0.08 49 0.09 0.00 L16 5.875-4.5 0.04 49 0.07 0.00 L17 4.5-3.5 0.02 49 0.05 0.00 L18 3.5-0 0.01 49 0.04 0.00 Critical Deflections and Radius of Curvature - Service Wind Elevation Appurtenance Gov. Deflection Tilt Twist Radius of Load Curvature ft Comb. in ° ° ft 108.0000�(2)HBX-4517DS-VTM w/Mount 49 14.67 1.25 0.00 15510 Pipe tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 • • February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Sfructural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 32 Elevation Appurtenance Gov. Deflection Tilt Twist Radius of Load Curvature ---.._......_ft_._._.__.._..._.._.._................._..._....._.._._.....__..__...........-------..._.......__...._..__Comb:._._........_.._._..--��---....._..._._._....................._...�..................____.._.._........._...._.`......_._..._...._.__..._...---..........._n...._........__.._.__..... 102.0000 (2)BXA-70090/4CF w/Mount 49 13.11 1.23 0.00 10948 Pipe 100.0000 A-18A24N-U 49 12.60 1.22 0.00 7382 88.0000 ERICSSON AIR 21 B2A B4P w/ 49 9.71 1.03 0.00 3289 Mount Pipe 78.0000 (4)D6845N65ZAXT w/Mount 49 7.66 0.92 0.00 8265 Pipe 70.0000 800 10121 w/Mount Pipe 49 6.17 0.86 0.00 6928 30.0000 GPS-TMG-26NMS 49 1.08 0.35 0.00 4697 Maximum Tower Deflections - Desi n Wind Section Elevation Horz. Gov. Tilt Twist No. Deflection Load ft in Comb. ° ' --------- ------...---.._.._.._..---..._ _._..�- --------------------- L1 108.5-100.5 105.63 22 8.93 0.02 L2 100.5-100 90.87 22 8.77 0.02 L3 100-82.25 89.95 22 8.75 0.02 L4 82.25-81.3333 60.74 22 6.78 0.01 L5 81.3333- 59.45 22 6.72 0.01 76.6667 L6 76.6667- 52.98 22 6.57 0.01 73.5787 L7 73.5787- 48.83 22 6.32 0.01 66.4167 L8 66.4167-60.17 39.62 22 5.99 0.01 L9 60.17-33.9351 32.20 22 5.38 0.01 L10 38.0645-30.5 12.55 22 3.11 0.01 L11 30.5-28.75 8.00 22 2.55 0.00 L12 28.75-16.125 7.09 22 2.39 0.00 L13 16.125-12.875 2.21 22 1.31 0.00 L14 12.875-8.125 1.41 22 1.04 0.00 L15 8.125-5.875 0.56 22 0.66 0.00 L16 5.875-4.5 0.29 22 0.47 0.00 L17 4.5-3.5 0.17 22 0.36 0.00 L18 3.5-0 0.11 22 0.29 0.00 Critical Deflections and Radius of Curvature - Desi n Wind Elevation Appurtenance Gov. Deflection Tilt Twist Radius of Load Curvature ft Comb. in ° ' ft 108.0000 (2)HBX-4517DS-VTM w/Mount 22 104.70 8.92 0.02 2295 Pipe 102.0000 (2)BXA-70090/4CF w/Mount 22 93.61 8.80 0.02 1618 Pipe 100.0000 A-1 SA24N-U 22 89.95 8.75 0.02 1092 88.0000 ERICSSON AIR 21 B2A 64P w/ 22 69.39 7.41 0.02 477 Mount Pipe 78.0000 (4)D6845N65ZAXT w/Mount 22 54.81 6.62 0.02 1189 Pipe 70.0000 800 10121 w/Mount Pipe 22 44.15 6.14 0.01 993 30.0000 GPS-TMG-26NMS 22 7.73 2.50 0.01 658 Com ression Checks Pole Desi n Data Section Elevation Size L L„ KI/r A P„ �P„ Ratio No. P� ft ft ft inz K K �p� L1 108.5-100.5 TP12x12x0.375 8.0000 0.0000 0.0 13.695 -1.96 431.40 0.005 tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 � • February 14, 2014 1 DO Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 33 Section Elevation Size L L„ KI/r A P„ �P„ Ratio No. P� ft ft ft inz K K �p� �� ---- 4 L2 100.5-100 TP14.5x12x0.375 0.5000 0.0000 0.0 13.695 -1.97 431.40 0.005 (2) 4 L3 100-82.25 TP18.5568x14.5x0.1875 17.750 0.0000 0.0 11.090 -4.41 785.63 0.006 (3) 0 5 L4 82.25- TP18.7663x18.5568x0.49 0.9167 0.0000 0.0 28.970 -4.55 2135.41 0.002 81.3333(4) 23 4 L5 81.3333- TP19.8329x18.7663x1.05 4.6666 0.0000 0.0 63.697 -7.19 4695.17 0.002 76.6667(5) 34 9 L6 76.6667- TP20.5387x19.8329x0.45 3.0880 0.0000 0.0 29.387 -7.65 2166.18 0.004 73.5787(6) 44 9 L7 73.5787- TP21.7666x20.5387x0.92 7.1620 0.0000 0.0 62.165 -11.24 4582.25 0.002 66.4167(7) 64 9 L8 66.4167- TP23.1648x21.7666x0.47 6.2467 0.0000 0.0 35.045 -12.49 2583.18 0.005 60.17(8) 98 2 L9 60.17- TP29.0368x23.1648x0.49 26.234 0.0000 0.0 44.160 -17.82 3255.05 0.005 33.9351 (9) 66 9 2 L10 33.9351 - TP29.2292x27.1193x0.53 7.5645 0.0000 0.0 49.824 -20.58 3672.53 0.006 30.5(10) 93 0 L11 30.5-28.75 TP29.6177x29.2292x0.59 1.7500 0.0000 0.0 55.196 -21.17 4068.51 0.005 (11) 05 2 L12 28.75- TP32.4203x29.6177x0.62 12.625 0.0000 0.0 64.003 -25.42 4717.67 0.005 16.125(12) 52 0 2 L13 16.125- TP33.1418x32.4203x0.61 3.2500 0.0000 0.0 64.254 -26.55 4736.21 0.006 12.875(13) 35 6 L14 12.875- TP34.1963x33.1418x0.63 4.7500 0.0000 0.0 68.989 -28.28 5085.22 0.006 8.125(14) 85 6 L15 8.125-5.875 TP34.6958x34.1963x0.59 2.2500 0.0000 0.0 65.191 -29.09 4805.25 0.006 (15) 37 3 L16 5.875-4.5 TP35.001 x34.6958x0.592 1.3750 0.0000 0.0 65.621 -29.57 4836.94 0.006 (16) 3 3 L17 4.5-3.5(17) TP35.223x35.001 x0.6653 1.0000 0.0000 0.0 74.036 -29.98 5457.21 0.005 2 L18 3.5-0(18) TP36x35.223x0.5908 3.5000 0.0000 0.0 67.362 -31.25 4965.31 0.006 7 Pole Bendin Desi n Data Section Elevation Size M,,, �M,,, Ratio M,,,. �M,,,, Ratio NO. M�x M�y ft kip-ft kip-ft �M�x kip-ft kip-ft �M�� L1 108.5-100.5 TP12x12x0.375 40.88 133.07 0.307 0.00 133.07 0.000 ��) L2 100.5-100 TP14.5x12x0.375 40.88 133.07 0.307 0.00 133.07 0.000 �2) L3 100-82.25 TP18.5568x14.5x0.1875 257.71 293.34 0.879 0.00 293.34 0.000 (3) L4 82.25- TP18.7663x18.5568x0.49 271.92 780.27 0.348 0.00 780.27 0.000 81.3333(4) 23 L5 81.3333- TP19.8329x18.7663x1.05 363.60 1714.38 0.212 D.00 1714.38 0.000 76.6667(5) 34 L6 76.6667- TP20.5387x19.8329x0.45 433.64 873.59 0.496 0.00 873.59 0.000 73.5787(6) 44 L7 73.5787- TP21.7666x20.5387x0.92 624.56 1877.45 0.333 0.00 1877.45 0.000 66.4167(7) 64 L8 66.4167- TP23.1648x21.7666x0.47 817.83 1178.37 0.694 0.00 1178.37 0.000 60.17(8) 98 L9 60.17- TP29.0368x23.1648x0.49 1564.93 1813.22 0.863 0.00 1813.22 0.000 33.9351 (9) 66 L10 33.9351 - TP29.2292x27.1193x0.53 1844.78 2123.63 0.869 0.00 2123.63 0.000 30.5(10) 93 L11 30.5-28.75 TP29.6177x29.2292x0.59 1911.48 2376.67 0.804 0.00 2376.67 0.000 (11) 05 L12 28.75- TP32.4203x29:6177x0.62 2411.01 3020.70 0.798 0.00 3020.70 0.000 16.125(12) 52 L13 16.125- TP33.1418x32.4203x0.61 2544.58 3104.94 0.820 0.00 3104.94 0.000 tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 • • February 14, 2014 100 Ff Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 34 Section Elevation Size M,,, �M„x Ratio M„y �M,,,. Ratio No. tiiux Muy ft krp-ft kip-ft ��y�, kip-ft kip-ft �M„y �12.875(13) 35 L14 12.875- TP34.1963x33.1418x0.63 2743.28 3438.70 0.798 0.00 3438.70 0.000 8.125(14) 85 L15 8.125-5.875 TP34.6958x34.1963x0.59 2838.85 3307.32 0.858 0.00 3307.32 0.000 (15) 37 L16 5.875-4.5 TP35.001x34.6958x0.592 2897.71 3359.72 0.862 0.00 3359.72 0.000 (16) 3 L17 4.5-3.5(17) TP35.223x35.001x0.6653 2940.73 3799.34 0.774 0.00 3799.34 0.000 L18 3.5-0(18) TP36x35.223x0.5908 3092.79 3551.00 0.871 0.00 3551.00 0.000 Pole Shear Desi n Data Section Elevation Size Actual �V„ Ratio Actual �T„ Ratio NO. V„ V„ T„ T ft K K �� kip-fr klp-ft �T� L1 108.5-100.5 TP12x12x0.375 8.96 215.70 0.042 0.01 202.64 0.000 (1) L2 100.5-100 TP14.5x12x0.375 9.00 262.09 0.034 0.01 202.64 0.000 �2) L3 100-82.25 TP18.5568x14.5x0.1875 15.41 392.82 0.039 0.22 594.81 0.000 (3) L4 82.25- TP18.7663x18.5568x0.49 15.59 1067.70 0.015 0.24 1582.13 0.000 81.3333(4) 23 L5 81.3333- TP19.8329x18.7663x1.05 22.37 2347.59 0.010 0.40 3476.24 0.000 76.6667(5) 34 L6 76.6667- TP20.5387x19.8329x0.45 23.00 1083.09 0.021 0.50 1771.37 0.000 73.5787(6) 44 L7 73.5787- TP21.7666x20.5387x0.92 30.31 2291.13 0.013 1.36 3806.88 0.000 66.4167(7) 64 L8 66.4167- TP23.1648x21.7666x0.47 31.59 1291.59 0.024 1.59 2389.36 0.001 60.17(8) 98 L9 60.17- TP29.0368x23.1648x0.49 36.12 1627.52 0.022 2.43 3676.65 0.001 33.9351 (9) 66 L10 33.9351 - TP29.2292x27.1193x0.53 37.81 1836.26 0.021 2.74 4306.07 0.001 30.5(10) 93 L11 30.5-28.75 TP29.6177x29.2292x0.59 38.37 2034.26 0.019 2.78 4819.13 0.001 (11) 05 L12 28.75- TP32.4203x29.6177x0.62 40.82 2358.84 0.017 3.30 6125.04 0.001 16.125(12) 52 L13 16.125- TP33.1418x32.4203x0.61 41.41 2368.10 0.017 3.44 6295.86 0.001 12.875(13) 35 L14 12.875- TP34.1963x33.1418x0.63 42.28 2542.61 0.017 3.64 6972.60 0.001 8.125(14) 85 L15 8.125-5.875 TP34.6958x34.1963x0.59 42.70 2402.62 0.018 3.73 6706.22 0.001 (15) 37 L16 5.875-4.5 TP35.001 x34.6958x0.592 42.95 2418.47 0.018 3.79 6812.47 0.001 (16) 3 L17 4.5-3.5(17) TP35.223x35.001x0.6653 43.13 2728.60 0.016 3.84 7703.87 0.000 L18 3.5-0(18) TP36x35.223x0.5908 43.79 2482.65 0.018 4.00 7200.32 0.001 Pole Interaction Design Data Section Elevation Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Comb. Allow. Criteria No. P„ M„x M„y V„ T� Stress Stress ft �Pn �Mnx fiMy �V� �T� R2tl'O Ret10 L1 108.5-100.5 0.005 0.307 0.000 0.042 0.000 T 0.314 1.000 4 S 2�/'' (1) � L2 100.5-100 0.005 0.307 0.000 0.034 0.000 0.313 1.000 4$2�'" t2> �,' L3 100-82.25 0.006 0.879 0.000 0.039 0.000 0.886 1.000 4$2�f (3) � L4 82.25- 0.002 0.348 0.000 0.015 0.000 0.351 1.000 4$2�/ tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 . • February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Projecf Number 37514-0293, Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 35 Section Elevation Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Comb. Allow. Criteria No. P„ M„x M„y V„ T„ Stress Stress n �Pn �N1nx �MnY �Vn �Tn RetiO Ret10 81.3333(4) � L5 81.3333- 0.002 0.212 0.000 0.010 0.000 0.214 1.000 4 8 2� 76.6667(5) �/ L6 76.6667- -0.004 0.496 0.000 0.021 A.000 0.500 1.000 4$2� 73.5787(6) �,r� L7 73.5787- 0.002 0.333 0.000 0:013 0.000 0.335 1.000 4 8 2 i� 66.4167(7) � L8 66.4167- 0.005 0.694 0.000 0.024 0.001 0.700 1.000 4$2�/ 60.17(8) � L9 60.17- 0.005 0.863 0.000 0.022 0.001 0.869 1.000 4$Z�' 33.9351 (9) y� L10 33.9351 - 0.006 0.869 0.000 0.021 0.001 0.875 1.000 4 8 2�' 30.5(10) � L11 30.5-28.75 0.005 0.804 0.000 0.019 0.001 0.810 1.000 4$2 V/ (11) � L12 28.75- 0.005 0.798 0.000 0.017 0.001 0.804 1.000 4 8 2� 16.125(12) �' L13 16.125- 0.006 0.820 0.000 0.017 0.001 0.825 1.000 4$2� 12.875(13) y� L14 12.875- 0.006 0.798 0.000 0.017 0.001 0.804 1.000 4 8 2� 8.125(14) � L15 8.125-5.875 0.006 0.858 0.000 0.018 0.001 0.865 1.000 4$2 i�/ (15) �+'i L16 5.875-4.5 0.006 0.862 0.000 0.018 0.001 0.J8�,6�9 1.000 4$2� ��6� M�` L17 4.5-3.5(17) 0.005 0.774 0.000 0.016 0.000 0.780 1.000 4$2� � L18 3.5-0(18) 0.006 0.871 0.000 0.018 0.001 0.878 1.000 4 8 2�r+�" � Section Ca acit Table Section Elevation Component Size Critical P mPalbw % Pass No. ft Type Element K K Capacity Fail L1 108.5-100.5 Pole TP12x12x0.375 1 -1.96 431.40 31.4 Pass L2 100.5-100 Pole TP14.5x12x0.375 2 -1.97 431.40 31.3 Pass L3 100-8225 Pole TP18.5568x14.5x0.1875 3 -4.41 785.63 88.6 Pass L4 82.25-81.3333 Pole TP18.7663x18.5568x0.4923 4 -4.55 2135.41 35.1 Pass L5 81.3333- Pole TP19.8329x18.7663x1.0534 5 -7.19 4695.17 21.4 Pass 76.6667 L6 76.6667- Pole TP20.5387x19.8329x0.4544 6 -7.65 2166.18 50.0 Pass 73.5787 L7 73.5787- Pole TP21.7666x20.5387x0.9264 7 -11.24 4582.25 33.5 Pass 66.4167 L8 66.4167-60.17 Pole TP23.1648x21.7666x0.4798 8 -12.49 2583.18 70.0 Pass L9 60.17-33.9351 Pole TP29.0368x23.1648x0.4966 9 -17.82 3255.05 86.9 Pass L10 33.9351 -30.5 Pole TP29.2292x27.1193x0.5393 10 -20.58 3672.53 87.5 Pass L11 30.5-28.75 Pole TP29.6177x29.2292x0.5905 11 -21.17 4068.51 81.0 Pass L12 28.75-16.125 Pole TP32.4203x29.6177x0.6252 12 -25.42 4717.67 80.4 Pass L13 16.125-12.875 Pole TP33.1418x32.4203x0.6135 13 -26.55 4736.21 82.5 Pass L14 12.875-8.125 Pole TP34.1963x33.1418x0:6385 14 -28.28 5085.22 80.4 Pass L15 8.125-'S.875 Pole TP34.6958x34.1963x0:5937 15 -29.09 4805.25 86.5 Pass L16 5.875-4.5 Pole TP35.001x34.6958x0.5923 16 -29.57 4836.94 86.9 Pass L17 4.5-3.5 Pole TP35.223x35.001 x0.6653 17 -29.98 5457.21 78.0 Pass L18 3.5-0 Pole TF36x35.223x0.5908 18 -31.25 4965.31 87.8 Pass Summary Pole(L3) 88.6 Pass RATING= 88.6 Pass tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 . • � February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Exfension Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Applicafion 216266, Revision 2 Page 36 APPENDIX B $ASE LEVEL DRAWING (wsTa��eo—iN (z) 7'coNouir) (1) 3/B'TO 70 R LEVEI _ (2) 3/4"TO 70 FT LEVEL (INSTALLED) (12) 7/8"TO 70 fT LEVEL �� •• C�IAIBING PEGS W/SAFfEY CLIMB ••••• • (INc7qL�ED) �' ��`-..__ ` •. (t) 1/2"TO 30 R LEVEL \� (1) 3/8"TO tOb FT LEVEL • (1�) 1-5/B"TO �OB FT LEVEL "_ ' � �• ✓ � i — � � � \ . (INSTALLED) �� (12) 7/8"TO �8 FT LEVEL .�� ` •�. • �� ' 1 � �� °��,' � �;�� • �. e�o j I�� . '; / � J .^:^, � V %�� .1. `�-,., �. :� ,_�::, � , � (INSTALLED) � � �`� (�2) �/e"ro sa Fr�eve� �� .___ _ " (INSTALLED) \ � (�) �/z'.c io2 �r �cvE� � (iz) �/e"ro �o� � �eve� \ � tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 • � February 14, 2014 100 Ft Monopole w/8.5 Ft Extension Tower Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 37514-0293,Application 216266, Revision 2 Page 37 APPENDIX C ADDITIONAL CALCULATIONS tnxTower Report-version 6.1.4.1 . . � � ,�8.5K ':� � , DESIGNED APPURTENANCE LOADING � � ,� o o TYPE ELEVATION TYPE ELEVA710N I ' � � H � ' (2)HBX-0577DS-VTM w/Mount Pi�8 ��(4)D6845N65ZAXT w/MouM Pipe I 8 �. m o ', ^' . � . .___. . . ... ___.. . ____. ._..__ ., . � � �. : � � ....._.. __. ._ _......_ ._ ..._...__ . . ... ...... ...... __�: � � �: ',(2)HBX-4517DS-VTM w/Mount Pipe ;108 �(4)D8845N65ZAXT w!Mount Pipe 78 � '�. o , o : : ........ .......... ._...... -..-.--- . ..........._... ......_._..._ __ .._..._. __ , ' 100.5 h '�.(2)HBX-4517D5-VTM w/Mount Pipe .108 �PlaHortn Mount(LP 303-1] ��78 o �n �- -""-��- " -�p �-. � : ; �i .T-ArmMount[fA702-3J �708 �,(4)DBSOSN65ZAXTw/MountPipe �78 I � , �� m ;(2)BXA-7009W4CF w/Mount Pipe ;702 '800 10121 w/Mount Pipe ':70 i �.... -. a ., ' �,(2)BXA-7009N4CF w/Mount Pipe ;702 �.800 10t21 w!Mount Pipe 70 ; ., ��:� ,, j ,. ,, �,(2)BXA-7009N4CF w/Mount Pipe I 102 �(2)ETD819G12U8 ._......._ 70 _._.__ .._...___._ � _..._. __. � . .BXA-171090I8CF w/Mount Pi �102 ... (2)ETD819G-12U6 70�- ' ', . ' ... _ _"_'._. .. _ _ �'.. j o � '.. o � m ��. , m �I� _I. �'.BXA-171090IBCF w/Mount Pipe 702 ....... . (2)E7D819G-12U8.... 70 ....... -..._ . ,y � vo <v m � o � ._....... , . . .."'. ' _ ' _ . ... .. ____...... _ __ ..... � � " � � �� "' o ��, : ;BXA-171090/BCF w/Mount Pipe i 102 (2)ETM190G12UB 70 � , r o :. v m . ;, . ..._. ...._ � . .- . � .. , . _....___ "_"._..__ ........__..} _____._ '...._ ..___. ....__ . 1. . ,, � �� :(2)FD9R6004 �102 �(2)E1M190G12UB F70 � . �� . I ��: .. __ __._. _..__ __ __ '.- : i . :: �, _.. ..... _ r .._._ _ .___ ' � : - ..... ..... . i : , � , :(2).FD9R6004 i 102 (2)ETM190G12U8 '~70 ' , .... ._ __ '__.. ... _'_i._..._ __._ �( I .._._ .._.___ . _._ ._.....i ! '. " i(2)FD9R6004 ;102 2 CCDP-565-1 W �70 , �', . ¢ 'I �.8-ftLadder I702 (2)CCDP-S6SiW ;70 °p � � �'�, 82.3 . : ',PlaHorm Mount[LP 602-1] �102 '�.(2)CCDP-S6S1 W F�0 I >..._ . _ .......... . v N- �`�"r m-�:- , � � A-18P.24N-U �100 DBXNH-6565A-A2M w/Mount Pipe '�,70 �I � � n w � �' . :. I .ERICSSON PJR 2�82A B4P w/Mount�88 DB%NI1�565P.-A2M w/Mount Pipe �70 i . � � � o :. n m . � � � j. �i ,,PiPe . ._._.__ ._'___ �. __ .._........ DBXNH-65fi5A-AZMw/MountPipe �7U .. . . _�i � d � m , °' � � , '� ' ERICSSON AIR 21 B2A B4P w/Mount�88 �� -- - � � � ; , : �g_7 g : 9 4 4 2 R R H 7 0 0 7 0 � _ ._._...... ____..._ ._.__.._ _._._--._: �.� � i � o �.� .:; '�_.,�.�_. `-�, 73:§_ft.. ;..___ .',,.P�SSON AIR 21 B4A 82P w/Mount 88 9442 RRH 700 _....... ___...._.... �� ._.__ .___-.__-.-{: _. .... __ _... 9442 RRH 700 �70 ;_ i _..._ : ..__.. ._.____. _..._.._ ____._._ ..._-._.___ � ERICSSON AIR 27 B4A 82P wl Mount i BB ��42 RRH AW S -70 r '. � � , I �..p�pe i -9442RRHAWS �70 � I � � °p N '� � �: � : : f 9442 RRH AWS 70 � � o, r . .ERICSSON AIR 21 B4A B2P w/Mount��8B '� r o � w . : ; P�Pe ._ �_._`... ......_ DC6-08-60.7&8F �70 i N pe ;70 , 66.4 ft I KRY 112 14M7 88 DBXNFF8585A-A2M w_I Maunt P'pe 70 __ _ i � � -1 KRY 112 144/1 I BB DBXNH-8585A-A2M w/Mount Pi __' __'_ : '� r m � e �. ( �. ',KRY 112 144/1 i 88..._ ...... DBXNH-8585A-A2M w/Mount Pipe .70... --- ��-�'- �. �� m m �� ; , _ ..__ " ._- .-__ , m � Q : �.._..._ ' _'_'___.._._. _. _... ___ . ._. m i � ; � '�T-ArmMount[fA602.9j �B8 T-ArmMounl[TA607-3j '�,70 � 602 tt � 16'x 2.375'Pipe Mount �88 ��800 10121 wl Mount Pipe 170 -6'x 2.375"Pipe Mounl i 88 �Pipe Mount�PM 601-1) �;30 �. ' '�. 'I . '�. ' '��6'x 2.375"Pipe Mount i 88 �GPSTMG26NM5 '30 � �. : ..__ ....._--' _____.. _r _.__ ..._._........_.: _'- � i � I ERICSSONFUR2182AB4Pw/Mount BB �. Pipe O ' MATERIAL STRENGTH � ; GRADE� Fy Fu � GRADE� Fy Fu � i � '�. , ��A5&&35 35 ksi !58 ksi Reinf 65.00 ksi 65 ksi ��.65 ksi ' �* fD � I I A572�5 65 ksi :80 ksi � � m I N � TOWER DESIGN NOTES , ' N ; 1. Tower is located in Suffolk County,New York. ' : ' i 2. Tower designed for Exposure C to the TIA-222-G Standard. , : i 3. Tower designed for a 120 mph basic wind in accordance with the TIA-222-G Standard. � i 4. Tower is also designed for a 50 mph basic wind with 0.75 in ice.Ice is considered to increase in thickness with height. 5. Deflections are based upon a 60 mph wind. M � 6. Tower Structure Class II. ' ;'N , ; a3 s n_ � 7. Topographic Category 1 with Crest Height of 0.0000 ft .... _.....m , N. oi � � � , 8. TOWER RATING:88.6% � � - ' S ...N m ; _� ...�-- 3os n o . ' 2e.e e i ', , , ALL REACTIONS ' ' AREFACTORED , AXIAL 61K � ;_ -----_- �__ ; �s:�n__ i SHEAR��, MOMENT � � I 7 K�� j 571 kip-ft � ' �2.s n � TORQUE 1 kip-k � 50 mph WIND-0.7500 in ICE ' " AXIAL � 8:.1 R I 31 K _ . � - �^ _� � s.s..n.. i 8 <_: i ffi � " 4511 � � _� g nr`�. $ �. o ' -'......... SHEA '� MOMENT ! i a N � . d � 44 K ` 3093 kip-ft � � i � ' 0.0 ft i � TORQUE 5 kip-ft ! a ' ', REACTIONS-120 mph WIND , y '; _ � c 'o d - - Y�I c i °1 m -- _ - � � �: ❑ �' 'p .o ��,; _ u n _ m y ' ' `n , � z' . F '. �°n i= ': m . (7 3 'j Paul J Ford and Company ob 100'MP w/8.5'Ext;NY Cutchogue 958280;Cutcho ue,N 250 E. Broad Street,SUItB 600 Project:p,/F#375140293(BCI#806579) Columbus, OH 43215 c�'�"� �C� orewnby:cmccartney APPd' Phone:614221:6679 Code:TIA-222-G Date:02/l4/14 S�� NTS FAX:614.448.4105 Patn: Dwq No.E_� PJF Job No. 37514-0293 Project Name: NY Cutchogue 958280 Engineer: CMM page 1 Factored.Foundation Loads: LC1 LC2 Factored Axial Load (+Comp, -Ten) = 31 23.25 kips 6 ft Square Factored Horiz. Load at Top of Pier= 44 44 kips Concrete Vol= I� � ' Factored OTM at Top of Pier= 3093 3093 kips 72.93 yd^3 LRFD Resistance.antl Load Factors: � Dead Load Factors = = rn Soil Bearing = 0.75 u' ; 3 Soil Wei ht= 0.75 12 0.9 (24 #11 Vert Bars o , 9 � - . a� Concrete Weight= OJ5 12 0.9 #6 Ties m Soil Properties: � � � N Depth to Water Table= 52 ft • Upiift Cone from Top of footing (18)#8 Rebar � � � � Top and Bottom � s I � � Layer Soil Cohesion Friction Ult Depth � Thk Density Angle Bearing ft pcf ksf degrees ksf ft j 12 115 0 0 10 12.00 (18)#8 Rebar i Top and Bottom i I 2.764 ksf 6.862 ft . Dimensions: � 527.7 kips Pier Shape = Square Pier Width = 6 ft Square 6.776 ft Pier Height above Grade= 2 ft Depth to Bottom of Footing = 10 ft � Footing Thickness = 4 ft 20.5 ft x 20.5 ft Footing Width, B = 20.5 ft Footing Length, L= 20.5 ft Concrete: Total Pad Reinf Stl = 28.44 in^2 >=21.25 in^2 = Min Stl, OK Concrete Strength = 3 ksi Total Pier Reinf Stl = 37.44 in"2 >=25.92 in^2 = Min Stl, OK Rebar Strength = 60 ksi Footing Thickness= 4.00 ft>=2.05 ft= Min Ftg Thk, OK Summarv Results: Required Available Maximum Net Soil Bearing = 2.990 ksf 7.500 ksf Stress Ratio= 39.9°la in Soil Bearing Uplift= 0.0 kips 420.4 kips Stress Ratio= 0.0°/a in Uplift Punching Shear Stress= 0.025 ksi 0.164 ksi Stress Ratio= 15.4% in Punching Shear Bending Shear Stress= 223.0 kips 879.2 kips Stress Ratio= 25.4°lo in Bending Shear Bending Moment= 1454.6 k-ft 2740.0 k-ft Stress Ratio= 53.1°lo in Bending Moment Conc Pier Reinforcing Steel= 3445.0 k-ft 5574.5 k-ft Stress Ratio= 61.8°la in Pier Rebar v3.3,Effective 2/10114 . • � � Date: 2I74/2014 PAUL J. i ORD AND C0��IYANY PJFProject 37514-0293 s 7 R 4- C T U R .� t. E ` c:� i ti � e H s Client Ref.# BU 806579 .�.=a:r.�<,t!�ox�w�«..�: . �u�o iaxr . c:a:�n.:i;::,.:in�o.ri?�:;y;iM Site Name: NY Cutchogue 958280 Descrip6on: 100'MP w18.5'Ext Owner. CCI v4.4-EHective 742-13 Engineer: CMM Asymmetric Anchor Rod Anal sis Moment= 3093 k-fl TIA Ref. G Location= Base Plate Axial= 31.0 kips ASIF= N!A q= 0.55 for BP,Rev.G Sect.4.9.9 Shear= 44.0 kips Max Ratio= 105.0� Threads= PUA for FP,Rev.G Anchor Qry 20 **For Post Installed Anchors:Check anchors for embedment,e ox /grout bond,and capacity based on roof load."* Nominal �ea Max Net Max Net Load for Capacity Anchor Dia, Location, Anchw Override, Compressi Tension, Capacity Overtide, Capacity, Capacity Item in Spec Fy,ksi Fu,ksi degrees Circle,in in� Area,in� on,kips kips Calc,kips kips kips Rrtio 1 2.250 ��BJ A615 Gr 75 75 100 37.5 44.00 O.DO 3.98 174.46 770.50 179.57 O.UO 260.00 69.1% 2 2.250 #18J A615 Gr 75 75 100 52.5 44.00 0.00 3.98 170.45 166.49 175.55 0.00 260.00 67.5� . 3 2.250 #18J A615 Gr 75 75 100 127.5 44.00 0.00 3.98 181.83 177.87 186.94 0.00 260.D0 7L9% 4 2.250 #18J A615 Gr 75 75 100 142.5 44.00 0.00 3.98 184.80 160.84 189.91 0.00 260.00 73.0% 5 2.250 iNBJ A615 Gr 75 75 100 217.5 44.00 0.00 3.98 168.98 165.02 174.09 0.00 260.00 67.0% 6 2250 #1 BJ A615 Gr 75 75 100 232.5 44.00 0.00 3.98 165.16 161.20 170.27 0.00 ?60.00 65.5% 7 2.250 M18J A615 Gr 75 75 700 307.5 44.00 O.DD 3.98 182.27 178.31 187.38 0.00 260.00 72.1� 8 2.250 tNBJ A615 Gr 75 75 100 322.5 44.00 0.00 3.98 186.53 182.57 191.64 U.00 260.00 73.7� 9 1.750 Dywidag(150 ksi) 127.7 150 0.0 47.00 0,00 2.71 135.36 132.66 138.84 U.00 314.40 44.2% 10 1.T50 Dywidag(150 ksi) 127.7 150 90.0 47.00 U.00 2.71 124.34 121.64 127.82 0.00 314.40 40.7Y 11 1.750 Dywidag(150 ksi) 727.7 750 180.0 47.00 0,00 2.71 132.42 129.72 135.90 0.00 314.40 43.2Y. 12 1750 Dywidag(150 ksi) 127.7 � 150 270.0 47,00 0.00 2.71 12229 119.60 125.78 O.DO 314.40 40.0% 13 0.000 Dywidag(150 ksf) 0 0 45.0 51.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0°6 14 0.000 Dywidag(150 ksi) 0 0 135.0 51.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 U.0°!o 15 O.D00 Dywidag(150 ksi) 0 0 240.0 51.5� 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 D.00 0,00 0.00 0.0% 16 0.000 Dywidag 1150 ksi} 0 0 300.0 51.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 17 2.500 A193 Gr 97 105 125 26.0 57.00 0.00 4.91 283.26 278.38 269.56 0.00 400.00 72.4°i� 18 2.500 A193 Gr 87 105 125 114.0 57.00 0.00 4.91 283.39 278.50 289.69 0.00 400.00 72.4% 19 2500 A193 Gr B7 105 125 285.0 57.00 0.00 4.91 276.75 271.87 283.05 0.00 400.00 70.8'6 20 2.500 A193 Gr B7 105 125 209.0 57.00 0.00 4.91 274.94 270.05 26124 O.DO 400.00 70.3% 62.32 =Copyright 2011,Paul J.Fad and Company,all right resened. • • Square, Stiffened / Unstiffened Base Plate, Any Rod Material - Rev. F /G Assumptions: 1)Rod groups at corners. Total#rods divisible by 4. Maximum total#of rods=48(12 per Corner). 2)Rod Spacing=Straight Center-to-Center distance between any(2)adjacent rods(same comer) 3)Ciear space between bottom of levelin nut and to of concrete not exceedin (1)`(Rod Diameter) _ ..�...._ --_ _ Site Data Base Reactions Moment adjusted to ' BU#: TIA Revision: G I account for Site Name: Factored Moment,Mu: 1354.4 ft-kips i additional anchor Ap #: Factored Axial, Pu: 15.8 kips ; rods. Anchor Rod Data Factored Shear,Vu: 22.5 ki s __ __ _ Eta Factor, r� 0.55 TIA G(Fig.4-4) Qty: 8 Diam: 2.25 in Anchor Rod Results Rod Material: A615-J TIA G-->Max Rod(Cu+Vu/n): 191.8 Kips Yield, Fy: 75 ksi Axial Design Strength, �'Fu*Anet: 260.0 Kips Strength, Fu: 100 ksi Anchor Rod Stress Ratio: 73.8% Pass Bolt Circle: 44 in Anchor Spacing: 6 Ifl Plate Data Base Plate Results Flexural Check PL Ref. Data W=Side: 42 in Base Plate Stress: 47.4 ksi Yield Line(in): Thick: 2.25 in PL Design Bending Strength,�"Fy: 54.0 ksi 23.40 Grade: 60 ksi Base Plate Stress Ratio: 87.8% Pass Max PL Length: Cli Distance: 16 in 23.40 N/A-Unstiffened Stiffener Data Weldin at both sides Stiffener Results Configuration: Unstiffened Horizontal Weld : N/A Weld Type: Vertical Weld: N/A Groove Depth: in"` Plate FIex+Shear,fb/Fb+(fv/Fv)^2: N/A Groove Angle: degrees Plate Tension+Shear,ft/Ft+(fv/Fv)^2: N/A Fillet H.Weld: <—Disregard Plate Comp.(AISC Bracket): N/A Fillet V.Weld: in Pole Results Width: in Pole Punchin Shear Check: N/A Height: in Mo• P� �e�9+h Thick: in },e�d �,�e Notch: in a �o`he,� st s< <= eASE P� Oty/ar I THICKNE55 Grade: ksi Weld str.: ksi '-'- �A°`h°` �YP � I � STiGFENED CON�IGURATiON GQ/ ' ' � `, �ASSUMED IN TOOI Pole Data / !/ B` � • Diam: 36 in ��"� ' --�-�— -- ' ��. � _�_.. Thick: 0.3125 in � ��`. � % I ' � �' I�np 1 CI r Space� Grade: 65 �ksi �°✓ �<� I / -I� q'�ao �o��' #of Sides: 12 °o� IF Round � \�so �.�.�.- ��9� I i� �aae w/ \�/ DIAM = D � \ Anchor Spociny Same As / Stl((en r Spac�ng. v Excepl lor Sianle Corne� Anchor (Inpul Clear Space) *Note:for complete joint penetration groove welds the groove depth must be exactly 1/2 the stiffener thickness for calculation purposes CClplate 1.5-Square Base F-G 1.2,Effective March 19,2012 Analysis date:2/14/2014 � • � Date: 2/14/2014 PAUL J. (C)RU AND CON1F'ANY' PJFProject: 37514-0293 5 T R 4 <:T 4% K A l EV (; I N � L K S a.v;[..<�y,,,.�;;nE,• . >��:,�r,�z� . ,.�,.�x-.�;.:;.�-�n�:,nxa�>,:i;nt3 ClientRe%# BU8D6579 Site Name: Description: Owner. CCI v4.4-Effective 7-12•13 Engineer. CMM As mmetric Bolt Analysis Moment= 31 k-ft TIA Ref. G Location= Flange Plate A�cial= 2.0 kips ASIF= NIA �= NIA for BP,Rev.G Sect.4.9.9 Shear= 9.0 kips � Max Ratio= 105.OY Threads= X•Excluded for FP,Rev.G Anchor Qty 9 **For Flange Plates:Pryin action is not considered in the balt loads.** Area Man Net Max NM Load for Capacity Nominal Location, Bolt Circle, Werride, Compressi Tension, Capacity Overtide, Capacity, Capacity kem Bolt Dia,in Spec Fy,ksi Fu,ksi degrees in inZ Area,inZ on,kips kips Calc,kips kips kips Ratio 1 1.D00 A193 Gr 87 105 125 0.0 25.75 0.00 0.79 6.63 6.19 6.19 0.00 56.80 10.9% 2 1.000 A193 Gr B7 105 125 30.0 25.75 0.00 0.79 6.63 6.19 6.19 0.00 56.80 10,9 k 3 1.000 A793 Gr B7 105 125 fi0.0 25.75 0.00 0.79 6.63 6.19 6.19 O.OD 56.80 10.9% 4 1.000 At93 Gr B7 105 125 120.0 25.75 0.00 0.79 6.63 6.19 6.19 O.DO 56.80 10.9°� 5 1.000 A193 Gr 87 105 125 150.0 25.75 0.00 0.79 6.63 6.19 6.19 0.00 56.80 tU.9% 6 1.000 A193 Gr 87 105 125 1 BD.O 25.75 0,00 0.79 6.63 6.19 6.19 0.00 56.80 10.9% 7 1.00D A193 Gr 67 105 125 24U.0 25.75 0.00 0.79 6.63 6.19 6.19 0.00 56.80 10.9% 8 1.000 A793 Gr B7 105 125 270.0 25.75 0.00 0.79 6.63 6.19 6.19 0.00 56.80 10.9% 9 1.000 A193 Gr 87 105 125 300.0 25.75 0.00 0.79 6.63 6.19 6.19 0.00 56.80 10.9% 7.07 =Copyright 2011,Paul j.Fwd and Company,all righl reserved. � • Stiffened or Unstiffened, Exterior Flange Plate -An Bolt Material TIA Rev G Reactions Bolt Threads: Site Data Mu 40.88 ft-kips X-Excluded BU#: 37514-0293 Axial, Pu: 1.97 kips Vn= 0.55'Ab*Fu Site Name: NY Cutchogue 958280 Shear,Vu: 9 ki s =0.75, 'Vn(ki s : App#: Elevation: 100 feet 40.50 Pole Manufacturer: Other if No stiffeners,Criteria: TIA G <-Only Applcable to Unstiffened Cases Flange Bolt Results Non-Ri id Bolt Data Bolt Tension Capacity,cp*Tn,B1: 56.81 kips cp•Tn Qty: 12 Ad'usted cp*Tn (due to Vu=Vu/Qty), B: 56.80 kips cpTn[(1-(Vu/cpVn)^z�^o.s Diameter(in.): 1 Bolt Fu: 125 Max Bolt directiv applied Tu: 6.19 Kips Bolt Material: Other Bolt Fy: 105 Min. PL"tc"for B cap.w/o Prv: 2.806 in Strength(Fu): 125 ksi Min PL"treq"for actual T w/Prv: 0.718 in Yield(Fy): 105 ksi Min PL"t1"for actual T w!o Prv: 0.926 in Circle in. : 25.75 T allowable with Prying: 25.45 kips 0<_a'S1 case Prying Force,q: 0.00 kips Plate Data Total Bolt Tension=Tu+q: 6.19 kips Diam: 28.5 in Prying Bolt Stress Ratio=(Tu+q)/(B): 10.9% r��=s Thick,t: 1.5 in Grade(Fy): 50 ksi Exterior Flange Plate Results Flexural Check Non-Ri id Strength, Fu: 65 ksi Compression Side Plate Stress: 8.6 ksi TIA G Sin le-Rod B-eff: 3.14 in Allowable Plate Stress: 45.0 ksi cp•Fy Compression Plate Stress Ratio: 19.1% ��5: Comp.Y.L.Length: Stiffener Data Weldin at Both Sides No Prying 22.78 Config: 0 * Tension Side Stress Ratio, (treq/t)^2: 22.9% �a�� Weld Type: 0 Groove Depth: 0 in** n/a Groove Angle: 0 degrees Stiffener Results Fillet H.Weld: 0 <--Disregard Horizontal Weld: n/a Fillet V.Weld: 0 in Vertical Weld: n/a Width: 0 in Plate FIex+Shear,fb/Fb+(fir/Fv)^2: n/a Height: 0 in Plate Tension+Shear,fUFt+(fv/Fv)^�n/a Thick: 0 in Plate Comp. (AISC Bracket): n/a Notch: 0 in Pole Results Grade: 0 ksi Pole Punching Shear Check: n/a Weld str.: 0 ksi Pole Data . � Diam: 12 in � - Thick: 0.375 in Grade: 35 ksi � #of Sides: 0 ^o^iF Ro�nd � �� " Fu 58 ksi � � ^ ��'� '' Reinf.Fillet Weld 0 °��If NOf1e , _ � � � ,. ,� *0=none,1=every bolt,2=every 2 bolts,3=2 per bolt "*Note:for complete joint penetration groove welds the groove depth must be exactly 1/2 the stiffener thickness for calculation purposes CClplate 1.5 - Ext Flange G 1.3, Effective March 19, 2012 Analysis Date: 2/14/2014 • � • Stiffened or Unstiffened, Exterior Flange Plate -An Bolt Material TIA Rev G Reactions Bolt Threads: Site Data Mu 40.88 ft-kips X-Excluded BU#: 37514-0293 Axial, Pu: 1.97 kips Vn= 0.55*Ab'Fu Site Name: NY Cutchogue 958280 Shear,Vu: 9 ki s =0.75, "Vn ki s : App#: Elevation: 100 feet 40.50 Pole Manufacturer: Other If No stiffeners,Criteria: TIA G �-Only Applcable to Unstiffened Cases Flange Bolt Results Non-Ri id Bolt Data Bolt Tension Capacity, cp'Tn,61: 56.81 kips WTn Qty: 12 Ad'usted cp'Tn (due to Vu=Vu/Qty), B: 56.80 kips cpTn[(1-(Vu/�pvn)^z�^o.5 Diameter(in.): 1 Bolt Fu: 125 Max Bolt directiv applied Tu: 6.19 Kips Bolt Material: Other Bolt Fy: 105 Min. PL"tc"for B cap.w/o Prv: 2.289 in Strength(Fu): 125 ksi Min PL"trea"for actual T w/Prv: 0.576 in Yield(Fy): 105 ksi Min PL"t1"for actual T w/o Prv: 0.755 in Circle in. : 25.75 T allowable with Prying: 33.08 kips 0<_a'<_1 case Prying Force,q: 0.00 kips Plate Data Total Bolt Tension=Tu+q: 6.19 kips Diam: 28.5 in Prying Bolt Stress Ratio=(Tu+q)/(B): 10.9% ��s� Thick,t: 1.5 in Grade(Fy): 50 ksi Exterior Flange Plate Results Flexural Check Non-Ri id Strength, Fu: 65 ksi Compression Side Plate Stress: 6.9 ksi TIA G Sin le-Rod B-eff: 3.89 in Allowable Plate Stress: 45.0 ksi �p•Fy Compression Plate Stress Ratio: 15.3°/a �'�� Comp.Y.L.Length: Stiffener Data Weldin at Both Sides No Prying 21.28 Config: 0 * Tension Side Stress Ratio, (treq/t)^2: 14.7% ?�:ss Weld Type: 0 Groove Depth: 0 in*' n/a Groove Angle: 0 degrees Stiffener Results Fillet H.Weld: 0 <--Disregard Horizontal Weld : n/a Fillet V.Weld: 0 in Vertical Weld: n/a Width: 0 in Plate FIex+Shear,fblFb+(fv/Fv)^2: n/a Height: 0 in Plate Tension+Shear,ft/Ft+(fv/Fv)^�n/a Thick: 0 in Plate Comp. (AISC Bracket): n/a Notch: 0 in Pole Results Grade: 0 ksi Pole Punching Shear Check: n/a Weld str.: 0 ksi Pole Data Diam: 14.5 in � - Thick: 0.1875 in �" Grade: 65 ksi � #of Sides: 12 °o��iF Ro��a �' " Fu 80 ksi ' � �` a � Reinf.Fillet Weld 0 "0°If NOf18 f,, P �"` r � *0=none,1=every bolt,2=every 2 bolts,3=2 per bolt "Note:for complete joint penetration groove welds the groove depth must be exactly 1/2 the stiffener thickness for calculation purposes CClplate 1.5 - Ext Flange G 1.3, Effective March 19, 2012 Analysis Date:2/14/2014 • r TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST BUILDING DEPARTMENT Do you have or need the following,before applying? TOWN HALL Board of Health SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 4 sets of Building Plans TEL: (631) 765-1802 Planning Board approval FAX: (631) 765-9502 Survey SoutholdTown.NorthFork.net PERMIT NO. Check Septic Form N.Y.S.D.E.C. Trustees C.O.Application Flood Permit Examined ,20 Single& Separate Storm-Water Assessment Form Contact: Approved ,20 Mail to:�� yy,i - /fj�,� Disapproved a/c ��D �u�,�isC /Yj,�y, boro��tC;,T Phone: ��4C!'/L� Expiration ,?p (.S/��97a-6y3i ��73� Building Inspector APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Date , 20 INSTRUCTIONS a. This application MUST be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 4 sets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises,relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and waterways. c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application,the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit shaU be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Certificate of Occupancy. f. Every building permit shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date. If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property have been enacted in the interim,the Building Inspector may authorize, in writing,the extension of the permit for an addition six months.Thereafter,a new permit shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York,and other applicable Laws,Ordinances or Regulations,for the construction of buildings, additions, or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described. The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws,ordinances, building code, housing code,and regulations, and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. T rll�.�� (Signature of applicant or name,if a corporation) 3SOa Sun��se ,�, ��ao3 �ar�i�i�cr- ,�l `f��/.' �A��s�aili address of applicant) ��7 ji u � State whether applicant is owner, esse , agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder i�'u,ne of ownee oi premise� (As on the tax roll or latest deed) [f applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer (Name and title of corporate officer) Builders License No. P(umbers License No. Electricians License No. `3.�y y Other Trade's License No. � 1. Location of land on w ich pro osed work will be done: �� c � SS � vh House Number Stre Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section C� ��p Block � Lot /9, / -� �` • • . Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot 2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of roposed co struction: a. Existing use and occupancy �v r f � b. Intended use and occu anc S ��M��/`2 (R�f P Y �� 3. Nature of work(check which applicable): New Building Addition Alteration �� Repair Removal Demolition Other Work (Description) 4. Estimated Cost Fee (To be paid on filing this application) �. If dwelling, number of dwelling units Number of dwelling units on each floor If garage, number of cars 6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use. 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories 8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories 9. Size of lot: Front Rear Depth 10. Date of Purchase Name of Former Owner 11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated L�y�� S�i � -� 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? YES NO � 13. Will lot be re-graded? YES NO �Will excess fill be removed from premises? YES NO 14. Names of Owner of premises Address Phone No. Name of Architect Address Phone No Name of Contractor Address Phone No. 15 a. Is this property within l00 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES NO ✓ * IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES & D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. b. Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? * YES NO * IF YES, D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16. Provide survey, to scale, with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 17. If elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below, must provide topographical data on survey. 18. Are there any covenants and restrictions with respect to this property? * YES NO * IF YES, PROVIDE A COPY. STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OFSUF�K ) `� � � �'�ll�'P�� being duly sworn,deposes and says that(s)he is the applicant (Name of individual signing contract)above named, (S)He is the (�eG� ��'�"G�,'�"� �V�,��/ (Contractor,Agent,Corpora Officer, etc.) of said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application; that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. Sworn to before me this �� day of S 2p� JENt+I)FER DONOHUE ,. - tst�of t�Nw Yo ` tary Public �No. otDoe2»o�s ' Si nature licant Oualitied In SuMolk Cou�ty g Commiasion Expires 09/08/20�' i � � � • Form No.6 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BU[LDING DEPARTMENT TOWN HALL 765-1802 APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY This appiication must be filled in by typewriter or ink and submitted to the Building Department with the following: A. For new building or new use: 1. Final survey of property with accurate location of all buildings, property lines, streets,and unusual natural or topographic features. 2. Final Approval from Health Dept.of water supply and sewerage-disposal (S-9 form). 3. Approval of electrical installation from Board of Fire Underwriters. 4. Sworn statement from plumber certifying that the solder used in system contains less than 2/10 of 1% lead. 5. Commercial building, industrial building,multiple residences and similar buildings and installations,a certificate of Code Compliance from architect or engineer responsible for the building. 6. Submit Planning Board Approval of completed site plan requirements. B. For existing buildings(prior to April 9, 1957)non-conforming uses,or buildings and "pre-existing"land uses: 1. Accurate survey of property showing all property lines, streets, building and unusual natural or topographic features. 2. A properly completed application and consent to inspect signed by the applicant. If a Certificate of Occupancy is denied,the Building Inspector shall state the reasons therefor in writing to the applicant. C. Fees l. Certificate of Occupancy-New dwelling$50.00,Additions to dwelling$50.00,Alterations to dwelling$50.00, Swimming pool $50.00,Accessory building$50.00,Additions to accessory building$50.00, Businesses$50.00. 2. Certificate of Occupancy on Pre-existing Building- $l00.00 3. Copy of Certificate of Occupancy- $.25 4. Updated Certificate of Occupancy- $50.00 5. Temporary Certificate of Occupancy-Residential$15.00, Commercial $15.00 Date. ��- / � / New Construction: Old or Pre-existing Building: ✓ (check one) Location of Property: a / �,�5 4 � v House No. Street amlet O�vner or Owners of Property: �'j�Qb /� �� r-LC Suffolk County Tax Map No 1000, Section `� ��Block � Lot�1�____ Subdivision Filed Map. Lot: Permit No. Date of Permit. Applicant: 7—��/�, � Health Dept. Approval: Underwriters Approval: Planning Board Approval: Request for: Temporary Certiticate Final Certificate: (check one) Fee Submitted: $ �_ Applicant Signature Veztdor No. Check Na Town of Southoid, New York- Payment'iJ'aucher 3373 , Entered by V endor Nazae Vendor Address CITYSCAPE CONSULTANTS,INC. 7050 W Palmetto Park Rd#15-652 Audit Dato Vendor Telephone Nwnber Boca Raton, FL 33433 561-558-28D8 Town Clerk en or =ona�t: Kay Mifes�954)609-9797 direct Invoicx Imroicc Invoice IJct Purcbeso Orda � IJumber Dste Totai Discrouat Arnpunt G7aimpd Number Drs tion of Goods or Suvioes Cienuei r Fund and 4cooant Ttumbu 3109 10/29/2014 $4000.00 n/a $4,000.00 27132 �nsulting Services re: � �� ireless App ica on or � T-Mobile NE at Junge ,'� 21855 CR 48 I . Payee Certification Department Certificetion Thc undersigned-(�lei�ttue�}(Actin$on behalfvfthe above named clalmaIIt) I hertby certify that ffia matetials ebove�ed have been reccived by ma dces hereby certify thel the forc�ing claim is true and anrect,thaT no part has in good eondiHon witlaut substitution,tho servias properly been paid,cxcept Ae therein stated,thra the helanca therein st�ed is sctually �'ormed and that the quaetities thereof hene been rerifced witb ihe exccptioru due anA owing, thattaxes from which the Towrt is�acempt arc cxcluded. �r ducrepanclp noled,and payment is approvcd. si�acure riue Business Manager g:� company Neme CITY�APE � Titie � �' � • , � � � ��1V��CE � CONSULTANTS, Itvc. DATE INVOICE# 7050 W. Palmetto Park Rd #15-652 Boca Raton, FL 33433 10/29/2014 3109 Tel: (877)438-2851 Fax: (877) 220-4593 BILLTO � � � .� .'� t��rl��• I� � Town of Southold � �� I''; Heather Lanza, AICP, Planning Dir NUV 6 2014 �' P.O. Box 1179 � Southold, NY 11971 SoutholtlTown �3 ! Planning Boan�+ ti ... __.._.. i � �--- Project Ref/PO: TMO LI13544A 21855 Cty Rd 48 ? �� Description Rate Amount I �__ Site Application Review and Analysis: TMO#LI-13-5440-A 4,000.00 4,000.00 �Site Application submitted by T-Mobile Wireless;to modify/upgrade equipment on existing structure located at 21855 County Road 48 �Review completed 10-9-2014 ��, � �� SCTM: 1000-96.1-19.1 PURCHASE ORDER#27132 I I � I � ; � � i ; 1 � ; ? � ; � , � � + � � ti � t � ; E I a p..__...��V______ i � Total sa,000.00 �__. www.CityScapeGov.com ,.n„�T,�-,�,,,,�,..1�-_, �..�. � _ ,�_ �_ _._ -:�- � ��,,. � _ -.�. ,� r�.�.. : --�--�,,..�.�..,�-.-.._,�,_ ,,�-,�._.a�,�--a-�. ., �'� � i. { = Tav�n� o� sv►��rr�c�t � � Purcha�e Orde►� __ . 2 7� � ' Tax Exempt � A,16�5� Date ��I�� Account � ��.�iG�,��'��°� De(ivar and ser�d biiling to: �Vendor�� , � ` � 1 . ; Department�'��1a��"i'? � ��+'�� ,� � �� .��'� �''i�'��'� f ��'`��.�;�;:��.. Address �� l�-l1��fi��'`� �. �,� ... (_ �'��,�� '�l �' �'�. `` ' � � ��.. _ � � l.. . r� � ._��",�.._.! , VENDOR .�_ . "*Return this copy and Town of Southold voucher itemized and signed for payment•* ITEM QUANTI� ..J , DESCRIPTI4N : 1,1NiT�C3�1`. T�TAL � , . � .�� ' ��' � , x �� r ��C.1%�" I `� � �:; � ; ' .:• �ii a.`' � � � � �-'� . 3 � _. .' . , . .. � � t�.� �kr � �.� � �` � � � , �;�e „. � � � ,�� _ �,..��.� _ ��` � "��"��"'� a�-.-., ��d��' THISPURCHASE ORDER IS N'OT VAL{D WITHOUT THE SIGNATURES OF THE DEPT.HEAD AND THE SUPERVtSOR I CERTIFY TIi�T THERE AR� SllFFICI UNDS AVAILABLE It�THE P RIA t�TA'�ED � C3�pL Head i CE�TlF1f TH Tt� BE A JUST AND TRUE�'�CHASE ORDER ,� � _:.,��;:'. � � � r � �.<:i..:�<.��'�t,�.,•�� ::.- _ Supe or �„�.�,..w}� f3EPARTI�A :., . . �.�_..,�.. �.. .. '� ..� ._ ._ ___ s� ..ti. , �: �.�,�..�.�. .:. �� - �tia��.,.��.�__,�b�_,.�,.,. -- .,.,�,�,.. ... �..._ �._�< � -� � ..� � � n.�-�, :�-----� � �--�.�°' ;' �T_ . . ±I�„��»_ �,.. �� r, � V' . •• �. i . �n`* . . . -':+SC^�- a�"r.nr.+s..:raafr.�a� , .> �r � . ' , . .. �� . .0 .. ; ,.. ' ..` . . r . . � '. �1'.. utt�o►d�'own TERNlS A11fD COI��1�'IONS °;- nnin9 BAard ..- „-__.�.,. }�_� �1. The TOWIV OF S(3UTH�LL7 is nofi responsible for r�aterials,sup�lie,�a�-�quipFnent deli�rer�d or services performed withput a�thority of writt�r� or,der. C�uant�t��s s�p�cifted ace�a�'��t��b�r �W .` exceeded. . s � , , � . _ , 2: No changes rnay be:ma�e in ttiis vrder with€�ut wri't#e�n autt�ority o�'t�i�ie supe��o"r. 3. Inspectiori of d�ti�r+�. .v�i1�be rnade�t 4��erjr>poir��ess'oth�tw�s#�eei�ed.Mater�af��. � . � � be properly�3acka�ed.�arr�a�ed��:�at,u�1�.not be��cc.��etl.�tn��u�e��rnz�.P�k��k�s�:�ti�� ,; ait shipment;s. Delive�r indoars�s requited,t�tnless ofhe�rise��e�.A°t��ices quo�l mu��r�- clude shippi►�g, handlirtg,t�c�in��r�ctcr�tir��charges and be'F.4.�.�efii�er�d,u�i�s��otkt��`�s ° , are agreed tc�. 4. Substitutions of specifi�d:i�ems wilt not be accepta�ate. 'fhe fiawn �f'�.4�thc�ld�res+�r�s.�h� right to reject and rett.�+�a at`slii�pers experi�e, materiafs deliuered v�h��f� dct r�ot corTfortn�i�€�e- ' scription of iitem order�d. , '- , � ` , ` 5. If order c,�nnot be fiiled in whole rar in'part in time;specified, nofiifythe town immediately. {n . case of delaj�in delivery,or in case of any default of.the vendor,tl�e tQwn rnay procure th�goods or services �Erom other soucces and hold the vendor respansibt� f�r any �XCESS CC1ST, EX- PENSE Of� [)AMAGE� occasi�rrecC'thereby. 6. Upon acr,eptance of this t�rder the v�,n�or agr�es to comply wi� aI1 Federat, State t�r fcacal laws retativE;thereta: : , ,. .. �- .F�: . a.The vendor.shall defend ac�ions or c�ai�s brought and hotd.�kis 7own of S�uthc�l�t, its agents and its�rnployees harmless.frot�n loss,suits,cos#s;�ights,`patent or patent �ights c►�any invention or any o#her cattse. b.The vei�dor Cepresents and warrar�ts t�iat the un�t pric�s ch�rrged her�in ar�no#:Mighe�than any applicabl� fegaf ma�tirrium prices permitted; and are nofi jn sxcess ofi thase curr�r�t(y charged t�o other govemmental, i�ns#itutiona#or corinrnerEial t�sers for similar items,quat�ti#ies and deliv�eries. c. Insofar as a�pli�ak�le,the V�ndor shall compty with Section�220, 220-a, �20-b, 22U-c, 22Q-d,2�0-e ai�d 2�2 af the Labvr�aw of the�tate Q#New Yc�rk relaxit�g tt�maximum work= i�ag hc�urs and rninirn:um wages o#emptoyees and pro�tibitii�g+r��rir�in�#i4r�,on account t�#race, sex,coioi-,�reed or nationaf origin in hiring employess within the�#at�,o�IUew�ork itivalved in tfie manu#actiure of materials, equipment, or suppties speeified it�tt�is vrder. ` d. The v+�ndor shall compty with Sections 103a and 103b ofi the General Municipal �2tw pertainir��to disqualifications of ct�ntrac#or for fa'rFure to'waiue immunity befc�re Grand Jury. 7. INV�tC1=S R�NDE�tED OM ERIGLOSED CLAIM FORM MUST �E ITEMtZ�D IN DETAIL. Claims for�iartial defiv�ries are not allowed unless indicated.Claims i�r qu�stifln will consti�u#e a - conditi�n`preced�rft�o tfi� right ofi the vendor br rec�iv� any p�yrri�i�t"a�fid matters �f di`spute : must b� ad;j�sted before finat acceptance by�the Tvuvn o#S�ut�old, , � � 8. Billing��sllaH allaw for e��r.aiption from taxes unde�r Feel�rat Ea�case�T��Exemption Certi#icate No.A-76�5�4 held by�hr�T�a�rn of�r�uthold. 9. Cash discount terms must be i�adi.cat�d on claim vc�ueher;discaunt j�eriod'wall.be�ompu#ed- from date c�f acceptance of delivery or receipt of a correct cl��m voucher,whic�ever�s later. 1Q. T�e prc�v'rsions of the New York State Fair Trade Law (Fe�d-Crarnif'�rci �4�t? �nd'#h�Feder�f ' ` Price Discrimination Law (Rot�inson-Patman Act) do not a{�pip to purchases rnade by the Town , of Sauthold. 11.All P.O./'Ciaims must be audited and approved by the Tow� Board priar to actual payment: �. . s _ _� -� _� .r�, :�- x ��.�.,�;xi��. ,_� y_.. .��.��,��,..,z.� _ �_ �._ . . _ � � MAiLING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ��OF S�UJ'yO P.O. Box 1179 DONALD J.WILCENSKI �� l0 Southold, NY 11971 Chair � � OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS N �c Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY � • �� 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III � (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR �CDU�� Southold,NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtowruiy.gov PI.ANNING BOAR.D OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 19, 2014 Mr. Richard L. Edwards d/b/a CityScape Consultants, Inc. 7050 Palmetto Park Road Boca Raton, FL 33433 Re: Consulting Services for T-Mobile NE at Junge Located at 21855 CR 48, Cutchogue, NY 11935 SCTM#1000-9(v-�-/tjy� Zoning District: R-80 Dear Mr. Edwards: The Planning Board has authorized your scope of services in connection with the above. This letter will authorize you to proceed with the consulting work as outlined in the Agreement. Enclosed is the approved Purchase Order#27132, $4,000.00, with amount not to be exceeded. Any work beyond this amount must be authorized in writing prior to being started. Also enclosed for your convenience is a Southold Town Voucher Form for your use with each invoice submitted to this department. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at 631/765-1938 befinreen 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Sincerely, �1a'-"�t,�w-� Brian Cummings � Planner Encls. • . �g1FF0(,�� TUWN OF S�UTHOLD � � �,�# �a� Purchase Order # _ 2 7� �2 Tax fxempt # R163554 Date 7 �1DI fT_ Accouni # Deliver and send b�tling to: Vendor�� t . ��,/ � � � Departme�t�/��th: �GL/� �/ �� l'��7��,/1 .�i' 1� �7Du� ��Ou►�� y �' / . Address .'r?� ��. ! l g '!�� Q-6Yy1�J��''��=l�L � � vc�v�lc�! /`� 11�'�ll �� `�`` � � �� Y I�� 1 � � � � VEi�IDOR � , � � � � �_ '*-i�etum this copy an,d Town of Southold voucher itemized��r�d�ign.ed for pay�nent`" =ITE�II�I QI�AIV��ITY' �� ,;DESCflI�PTI�?I�� ` UN1�T GQ�T, T4TA��L ` J'��,1�'L'I T� ��:� , . � �� M f ��}� � �� . _ � � �� . � . e N � � � � � . � �� l .�'""' � �� . �C , �,� � � � � �� . . : , , , _ _ c� � ,�� '�. � _ �+�� f� ~��' � � � � _ - `" �� THIS PU'RGMASE OR'DE'R �S NOT VALtD WITHOUT THE SIGNATURES OF THE DEPT. HERD AND THE SUPERV(SOR I CERT{FY TH�1T T�ERE AR� � � � � � � � � � �� SUFFICI UNDS AVAILABLE IN TME 4 , PRIAT -�htARG�D Dept. Head I CERTIFY THIS TO BE A JUST AND TRUE PURCHASE ORD�R y • • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOAR,D MEMBERS QF SO(/�' P.O. Box 1179 DONALD J.WILCENSKI �� y��O Southold, NY 11971 Chair � � OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS va � Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY � � Q 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III � � (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR I�CQU�� Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Accounting From: Planning Departme I�)M Date: September 15, 2014 Re: Checks The attached check is for a Consultant Escrow Fee for the Sprint Wireless review listed below. Please deposit into 6691 Deferred Revenue Account. Thank you. Applicant/Project Name & Tax Map Amount Check Date/No. T e # Wireless: T-Mobile NE at Animal 1000-75-5- Shelter Upgrades 14.1 $4,000.00 8/13/14-#2918380 escrow fee Wireless: T-Mobile NE at Junge 1000-96-1- $4000.00 8/13/14-#2913381 Up rades 19.1 escrow fee Im atts. I J # , . ... — � ■ � ■ ■ ■ (?� 1 p ] 'ir;';;, ' �� 1\J o rt h +�,� s� �L C � i ~ WILLIAM E COLLIN $ AIA 0 y A R C H I T E C T S, L L P 3 3500 SUNRISE HIGHWAY GREAT RIVER, NY 1 1739 � � ]2-1 TECFINOLOGY DRNE SPTiiUKEf.NY ll733 VOICE � 631-689-5450 FAX � G31-689-8459 h t t p : / / q p w . w f c a i a . c o m � LTE MODERNIZATION SITE I!!O. LI- 13-544 A � �o.,� No. ,4-,0�0� 0 � �CUTCHOGUE� Z 1855 COUNT Y I20r9 D 48 CUTCHOGUE NY 119.35 �` �� ' � � � a 1 6 II 14 ISSUmFORPRELIMINARYREVIEW JG ML � / � 2 06 I6 14 ISSUEDFOR REVIEW JG ML a ', 3 6 Ie 14 ISSUEDFOR REVIEW JG ML � � 4 25 14 ISSUEDFOR REVIEW JG ML � " 5 10 I4 LSSUEDFOR FlLING JG ML I � '. c 0 �� a. � �� ; �.� �. �.�-�y' � ; - s�`�;.�. �. � �� SECTION:096 BLOCK 1 LOT: 19.1 LATRUDE: N41'O i'46.4658" a � `�`�„ �� t=` � u ZONING: LI,UGHT INDUSTRIAL LONGITUDE: W72°29'S03736" T �� = -� {� CO�ORp1UlE5�NO EIEVAT�ONS REfERENLED ABOVE WERE SUPft1ED Bv i-MOB4E NOPTNEASi.iNC. NAD. 83 �I * A •N '°'� �.� Y`�""` 'T�' _' - y�. � � ��v"��:��E THE MCNITECI 1W(ES NO wMRWiIES OR GWRI�MEES REIATNE TO MEW,�CCURKY OR COniPWHCE vnTH f/N TC � } _:"; �'� . . ,r �4� � �� iOLERWLE. " ..__.0. i- .� q��. , :O+s... 4 . ,p NU1S.._ I at E . °` �- "^"'^"""'��-��' ��`� �,�. �,.�,�.��.. ,. .,„,�,,, (1)NO C�NSTRUCTION OR BIODING IS i0 PROCEED UNLESS � " � I : F;�, .` a>�, _ ,� � � � '._ .�f � � � AMSL' t56'-0' ..e�� y� . : ,s :_ � ' �� . ....PtANS�NKlUF1E-THE STAIEMENF...LSSULD-FOR-CONSTROCTION" . .... � �� `� ��_`�, � , {�� `�� LOCATIONOF EQUIPMENT: EXISTING CONCRETE PAD tr+rHc�esca�vrioH coiuMx eeove.reioa ro e�ooiHc oe ��, � � CONSTRUCTION,CONTRACTOR MUST ALSO CONTACT WFC TO I � '�" � `� � CONFIRM THEY ARE IN POSSESSION OF THE UTEST PUNS. I t nio'-. �� w�;'� : .'��.' � �,' EQUIPMENTSQUAREFOOTAGE: 120 SQ.fT.f � �- , -_ ; ; ,�° • .F � _ . _ <. �� - . : E �� f�� ` � �.,� ' � ��, � _ � . �:�- �. � � ' ��` � � ` ' ��: '° � �� ' "'� ' ��`' � ,;�EQUIPMENT: (1� EXISTING 512000 EQUIP CAB. (1) EXISTING 3106� UMTS CABINET � "?^, �� ' r�„,,.. ` � ; �� '� �� +y � �� f'�ANTENNA: (6) NEW AIR21 ANTENNAS /��} �� t ��. �� "�� ` s � � � � ,��, ,�,. �. � ` � � � �� 3 �� "�.�. � � � �. .�«� � �� '� A,� b,�. � , < � � �, . � t ; lf'�� •�NDtfti' '�/,, �, n�� -.�`-�. x # , , �� =P � *� '�p, �r �; ��'I r�L�G' �i1�,+ ' ,�� ;�` , �' ,� �' `� s ,� , 9 � ` � n ` * ,� � �' PROPEfZiYCOMACT: MATT BARTLETT (631) 804-7021 � �;4� �� ;� ,� �I I �� p$� � r��, �°�»� � s ��, '� :'�� ;�.,, ;' UTILffYCONTACf: � �' ``,; � �.�.i I ssr (516) 545-7676 LIPA � � :� �. ,�s r- �� o � � � �,� � � �� '" �' �' '� � �� APPLICANT: T-MOBILE NORTHEAST INC. 4 � � � I� :�'�� . . �x ��i al� . ;,, �, , ; a+ �, t �„_. ,.- � �-� �,^ � - �",,.. ,a,� -�i � _ � ,r . � � Y� s�` 1 p . � ' " .r Y4-r iy,,; �� 4,. , XT gi.-� " �"y, ' Y �` 'T I �� u,+t ��.� K � �t � � "� � �� " � T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC 3500 SUNRISE HWY,GREAT RIVER,NY 1 1739 � 64 �� ' ` � ""`��.., f �„y, � e � t �, '��`�"�i' ,$, , � CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: PAUL lAPASOTA�631�224-6651 (J '^� ��, � , b7 �+�� , � �<��' ��''� _ �=�"� � � � � RF ENGINEER: ENRIQUE RAMOS � N � � J . � .t 0 �� '� � �z� � � � ��' t��,� �� " RF MANAGER: NAMIT SHARMA �'`'�-----'-� L I I t O Z � T_� TITLESHEET T 11�Iobile � �l APPROVED 06/11/14 5 09/10/14 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ � � DIRECTIONS: � APPROVEDASNOTED Nort/��east LLC I � PAULLAPASOTA DATE DISAPPROVED REVISE A-1 AR ALN T 06 I1/14 5 09/10/14 I �` � � A-2 ENLARGED EQUIPMENT PLAN&NORTHEAST ELEVATION 06 1 1/14 5 09/10/14 3500 SUNRISE HWY. � _�,. A-3 TYPICALANTENNA DEfAILS 06/t 1/14 S 09/10/14 SUITE D-203 3 1. TAKE THE RAMP ONTO RT-27 E 28.8 MI � � � -� �� _ . ' .� � �� t�!�. � .� 4� A-4 ANTENNASCHEDULE&ROUTINGSCHEMATIC 06/il/14 5 09/10/14 GREAT RIVER� NY 11739 °' 2. TAKE EXIT 63N FOR CO HNlY 37 N TOWARD RIVERHEAD (0.3 MI) � APPROVED I t STTE INFORMATION 3. MERGE ONTO COUNTY RTE 31/O�D RIVERHEAD RD/RIVERHEAD RD (0.9 MI) �� APPROVEDASNOTED 0 4. SLIGHT LEFT AT COUNTY RTE 104/QUOGUE RIVERHEAD RD (1.4 MI) NAMITSHARMA DATE CIITCHOGZIE 5. SLIGHT RIGHT AT COUNTY RTE 705/CROSS RIVER DR (3.2 MI) � DlSAPPROVED/REVISE � = 6. TURN RIGHT AT MAIN RD�MIDDLE COUNTRY RD�RT-25 � ," � �� ° �� 5� ��,��`��'�� , �"�;��;� � � � � Z 18$S COUNTY ROAD 4H � CON7INUE TO FOLLOW MAIN RD�RT-25 (Z2 MI) �� APPROVED CUTCHOGUE,NY I�93$ �, 7. TURN LEFT AT LOVE LN (0.2 MI) � � 8. TURN RIGHT AT COUNTY RTE 48/ROUTE 48 �] APPROVEDASNOTED U-�.�S�F4-A n ' CONTINUE TO FOLLOW COUNTY R7E 48 (3-1 MI) ENRIQUERAMOS DATE �_J DISAPPROVED/REVISE ; DFSIGN T'YPE � COUNTY ROAD 48 CUTCHOGUE. NY 11935 ��'��"��'- w�==-`�. � �.��.��-�� o [--] APPROVED LTE MODERNIZATION — �_� APPROVED AS NOTED � � � x" '�' �ti; SHEET TTTLE DAN GUSTAFERRI DATE r— �� ? ' � ` Wl ' ..=i.° : , ; .>., ,. nY . e , 3 . �: , -.. << < . �. . �„r, R.: :� ��._�. . _ , �,` �a; L___,] DISAPPROVED/REVISE � TITLE , — L�tS[rt[�s��L�taS��w � -, a`.<. �. � _ � � � �r; SHEET E r-= � APPROVED SHEET NUMBER REV. ___, � " NOTE: � _; APPROVED AS NOTED sa�'��`�E��a- ';�ag �;�„��, , � COMMERCIAL TRAFRC IS NOT PERMfTTED ON PARKWAYS.VERIFY ALL ROUTES. CHRIS SCHAAF DATE � �_ J DISAPPROVED/REVISE T- 1 5 � GENERAL NOTES� 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL, - ' ' LAWS, ORDINANCES, AND REGULA710NS WHEREVER APPLiCABLE. _ c� � 2. EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL BE HELD TO HAVE VISITED THE SITE AND TO HAVE VERIFIED ALL EXISTING J CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF BID. - o �� 3. IN ALL CASES, DRAWINGS SHALL NOT BE SCALED FOR WFORMATION. FIGURED OIMENSIONS AND ,,o� CONDITIONS MUST BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD. �' 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL FIELD DIMENSIONS AND JOB CONDITIONS, AND EXIS7ING MONOPOLE � o � / N SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS, AND/OR OMISSIONS WHICH WOULD � INTERFERE WITH THE SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF THE WORK. SHOULD HE FAIL TO FOLLOW THIS ,!. j PROCEDURE AND CONTINUE WITH THE WORK, HE SHALL ASSUME ALL RESPONSIBIUTY AND LIABILITY W I L L I A M E C O L L I N S, A I A o ARISING THEREFROM. A R C H I T E C T S, L L P EXISTING T-MOBILE 3 EQUIPMENT PA0. � � 5. ALL ITEMS OF WORK IDENTIFIED ON THE DRAWINGS BY NAME, NOTE, OR MATERIAL DESIGNA ION A N W, SEE i/A-2 FOR / \. � UN�ESS OTHERwISE NOTED. ��r�ctQrowcY nxrve serwuc�r,xr n�3c+ r MORE INFORMATION ; /-�~"'�;\, 6. ALL NEW MATERIALS AND INSTALLATIONS SHA�L BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURERS IATEST voica � �-�-saso Fwx = ��as-sas� �\ PRINTED SPECIFICATIONS, AND WITH ALL APPUCABIE CODE REQUIREMENTS. h t t p : / / w w w . w f c a i a . c o m n zs`j �` \ 7. ALL WORK SHAIL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH BEST STANDARD TRADE PRACTICES. EACH TRADE � r`'� �\ � � S SHALL COOPERATE WITH OTHER TRADES TO FACIUTATE JOB SCHEDULING AND COMPLETION. WFC PRO7ECT NO. 14-10707 `o C1�R g '� / ��. r, \�9`'� 8. PROPRIETARY NAMES IDENTIFYING ITEMS OF WORK ARE USED TO DESIGNATE THE STANDARD OF � ,, 260' �p' �.�� F CONSTRUCTION. ITEMS OF EQUAL QUALITY MAY BE SUBMITTED FOR THE ARCHITECTS REVIEW AND �� o h�f �°'� �``� APPROVAL. i os ii �a tssumwrtar�uM�wvtrrsFnew �� M� �� ,' ` � 9. EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO AOJOINING REMAW�NG AREAS AS A Z ob ts/ta Ksueor�ort rs�nEw �� nn� c i�/ (� ``` / }f, �� \ 3 0 18 14 LSSUED WR REVIEW JG ML # `'� RESULT OF HIS WORK, AND SHALL REPAIR DAMAGED SURFACES TO THEIR PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS OR q oe zs ta arueuwR r�ntw � nn� ._ t�T � � � � AS MAY BE REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE ENTIRE SCOPE OF THE WORK. s os to ta ast�ow�t Flu� t� an� � / r'r` � � 4„ \ ``� 10. ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING WORK SHALL BE PATCHED AND FINISHED. AS NECESSARY, 70 MATCH EXISTING � � , o �� t `°,,,� �� ,�� CONTIGUOUS SURFACES OR NEW FINISHES SHOWN. 11. AT THE COMPLETION OF EACH WORKDAY, EACH TRAOE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING UP THEIR � � �� ji� 2 �� WORK. RUBBISH REMOVAL SHAIL BE DONE IN A DUST INHIBITIVE FASHION, AND THE JOB SITE SHALL BE � / ;� A_� ! \ FREE OF ALl DEBRIS AND BROOM CLEAN UPON COMPLETION. � �� -f f� � 12. CLEAN A�L FLOORS, WALLS, DOORS, MISC., GLASS, ETC. LEAVING JOB FREE OF DUST AND DEBRIS, PRIOR � r,` t' � ��']. � � ��.,, � ,n°� TO PROJECT COMPLETION. (1�0 CONSTRUCTION OR BIDDING IS TO PROCEED UNLE55 �� ^ �� 2 r't �� 'P � � � � � �� - 13. EXI571NG_EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS TO BE REMOVED, WHICH ARE NOT REOUIRED TO BE RELOCATED OR ruHs ir+cwoe rxe srnrcueHr'issueo voa cor+steucrioH• E � � � � - IN THE�ESCRIPTION COLUNN A80VE.PRIOR TO BIDDING OR ' o , jif � B' �� RETAINED BY THE OWNER, SHALL BECOME THE Pf20PERTY OF THE CONTRReTOR AND Bf REMOVED FROM- coNSTeucnoN�CbrrrancTOR wsracso cowrncr wrc m � .,-') .' � ,�'� THE PREMISES. CONFIRN 1HEY ARE IN POSSESSION OF THE UTEST PUNS. t f�� ``* 14. INDICATIONS OF WORK TO BE REMOVED ARE GENERAL ONLY, AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO SHOW ALL ITEMS � � fl 1� � � ,;ty WHICH MAY REQUIRE REMOVA�. SUCH ITEMS SHALL BE REMOVED, RELOCATED, AND/OR REINSTALLED, AS � � ��.� ,/ _„� '� REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION OF NEW WORK. O ' „ 15. THESE DOCUMENTS DO NOT AUTHORIZE DETERMINING THE PRESENCE, NOR THE REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS � ' �`'-� ��,ti � OR OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIA�S. IF DURING THE COURSE OF THE PROJECT, ASBESTOS OR OTHER ,- �C' ,� y� � `-�.� S,� � HAZARDOUS MATERIAL CONTAMINATION IS SUSPECTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CARRIER'S ��' �---- �.� O `.,,_ . � PROJECT MANAGER WITHIN 24 HOURS. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUSPEND WORK IN THE AFFECTED AREA UNTIL ` ' �5��- ' !�,� � � ��-,, SUCH A TIME THAT SAID AREA IS CERTIFIED CONTAMINATION-FREE. IN THE INTERIM, THE CONTRACTOR �7 , „,. C' Cr ~''�.,� � � SHALL ENDEAVOR TO RESCHEDULE WORK TO AREAS UNAFFECTED BY SUSPECTED CONTAMINATION IN t ��.^�.� `� ��' ORDER TO MINIMIZE DELAY TO THE PROJECT SCHEDULE. �� ` �� t $ O i o� `� �y. 16. ALL MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE W FULL CONFORMANCE WiTH N.Y.S. UNIFORM FIRE � � k � . r _-� / PREVENTION AND BUILDING CODE, AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS. �� 'i § KA .� r � EXISTING 't'�. �� 17. ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE INSTALLED BY AN ELECTRICIAN LICENSED IN SUFFOLK COUN7Y IN ` , . '� ' LANDSCAPED S4• � '� `� , AREA ?��K. ^ 4 ACCORDANCE WITH NEW YORK STATE AND NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODES. A NEW YORK BOARD OF FIRE Q , �"`� ,`�'� �3 UNDERWRITER'S CERTIFICATE SHALL BE OBTAINED FOR AL� ELECTRICAL WORK, AND SUPPLIED TO THE � � �, � OWNER AND ARCHITECT. `'�' �,r� �� / .� !y°j� �8 PROVIDE ANY AND ALl TREATED WOOD BLOCKING/BACKING OR 14 GA. GALV. FLAT STOCK BACKING AS �'`.,,��_:��/ � EXISTING \ `"4.,� �`'�" ry�' REQUIRED TO ENSURE PROPER AND ADEQUATE SUPPORT (IN COMP�IANCE WITH NEW YORK STATE � PAVEMENT 2S26g.� g� y BUILDING CODE MINIMUM LOADING REOUIREMENTS WHERE APPUCABLE) OF VARIOUS ITEMS INCLUDING, 8UT t � NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED TO, HANDRAILS, CABINETRY, SHELVING, HANDICAP GRAB BARS. TOILET o �'"^-.�� ACCESSORIES, CABLE TRAYS, CONDUITS, ETC. z o EXISTING � �� `�• 1 �9� ADA COMPLIANCE: THE FACILITY IS A NORMALLY UNOCCUPIED MOBILE RADIO FACILITY. � � ��f�� UNDERGROUND � ` � GENERAL SITE NOTES- ��1 � 7E�co/E�Ecr � �� Nortf-�e�st LLC 0 1. ALL SITE WORK TO CONFORM TO THE LATEST TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD SPECIFICATIONS AND 3500 SUNRISE HWY. t i STANDARDS. SUITE D-203 3 PROPERTY UNE �' -� 2 'DEWATER' ALL TRENCHES AS REQUIRED DURING INSTALLA710N OF ALL FOOTING AND FOUNDATION TO GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 � � ,' ENSURE PROPER DEPTH AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF CONCRETE. 3. THE DEVELOPER SHALL COMPLY WITH APPROVED WORKING DRAWINGS AND REQUIREMENT SHEETS. NO STTE INFORMATION L DEVIATION WILL BE PERMITTED EXCEPT BY WRITTEN APPROVAL OF TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD. , � EXISTING BUILDING 4. COMPACTION UNDER STRUCTURES, BUILDING SLABS, STEPS, PAVEMENTS AND WALK WAYS SHALL BE 95% Cl/TCHOGUE c MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY, ASTM D 1557. COMPACTION UNDER LAWNS OR IN UNPAVED AREAS, 85� MAXIMUM Z�g55 COUNTY ROAD 48 � DRY DENSITY, ASTM D 1557. CUTCHOGUE,NY 11935 Q5. ALL E�ECTRIC AND TELEPHONE SERVICES SHA�L BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND. [,�f,�S4�F-A 0 6. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO TONE PATH OF ExISTiNG CABLE AND PROVIDE MARK-OUTS. HAND ExrAVATE a NEAR ANY UNDERGROUND PIPES, UTILITIES, OR sTRUCTUREs. DESIGN T'YPE � ��- . 7. VERIFY LOCA?ION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES WITHIN AREAS OF WORK. PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY MEANS OF PROTECTION OF SAID EXISTING UTILITIES AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE NEW woRK. LTE MODERNIZATION o COORDtNATE ALL REOUIRED RELOCATION WORK WITH THE AFFECTED UTIUTY PROVIDER. � . 8. ALL WASTE MATERIAL WCLUDING RUBBISH, STUMPS, DEBR15, ETC., SHALL BECOME THF PROPERTY OF THE SHEET TiTLE � O C I Q � [I�j� CONTRACTOR AND BE REMOVED FROM THE siTE. ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN � TN 9. CONTRACTOR TO MINIMIZE THE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROL ! MEASURES. IF REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL &GENERAL NOTES �c �� GUIDELWES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. ALL CONCRETE USED FOR ON-SiTE CONSTRUCTION SHEET NLTMBER REV. " ARCHTECTURAL SITE PLAN �� SHALL BE AIR ENTRAWED, MINIMUM 4,000 PSI AT 28 DAYS. � 1 _,_ ___ _ _ � ;; �Q, IF EXISTING GRAVEL BEDDING iS REMOVEO, STOCKPIIE. AND RESPREAD F�S REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE � SCALE: 1��-=SQ�-O�� NORT1.{ NEW WORK. RESTORE LANDSCAPE FILTER FABRIC AS WELL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL MATERIALS AS REQUIRED. A- 1 5 11. FINAI. GRADE SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM THE PCS EQU�PMENT AND TOWER AREAS. (12) EXISTING T-MOBI�E ANTENNAS TO BE _ . REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH (6) AIR21 -� ' � ANTENNAS (NP. � (2) PER SECTOR). o — � REMOVE TMPs AS REQUIRED. (3) TO � - REMAIN. (1YP. (1} PER SECTOR). � N ti0'-0"t AGLh o T.O. EXISTING MONOPOLE AND / � OF EXISTING ANTENNAS BY OTHERS k � € ' � EXISTING 110'-0" MONOPOLE BY OTHERS t I } ; W ILLIAM R COLLINS, AIA i A R C H I T E C T S, L L P •- � � , � o i � � 3 + �� 'i Y2-1 TP.CHNOL06Y DRNE SE'fAUKHT.NY ll733 '. � , /` 104'-0"f AGL� � � j j ': � T.Q EXISTING ANTENNAS BY OTHERS vOICB � 63t-6�&ss� PAX ' 631-689'8499 � } � j� ; ; Lttp : / /wwv .nf caia . com � \ j EXISTING ANTENNAS BY OTHERS �yp'C PROJEGT NO. 14-10707 � } r' f � , 'o EXISTING GPS UNIT // /� � c ( No. L1�7E DE9�� o TO REMAIN r J' \ � � � ; 1 II I4 LSSU�FORRtEL1MINHRYRENEW J� ML > `� ' 3 (24) EXISTING T-MOBILE COAXIAL z ib i4 ¢su�Fort rs�v�w � ra� ort � } � f t>� � � ' € CABLES_ SWAP (1) EXISTING COAXIAL s os�a ia iisUEnwR r�neW � M� � o � ; ff �t � ; � CABLE WI7H (1) HYBRID FIBER CABLE a zs ia �iul�Foe R�nEw � M� a I`'�z � / � S 10 14 LSSUED FOR FILING JG ML � + / € � 10R 26o F.,ti f �i, � + rt,� \ / 92.-4'._ AGL� i c �- �/ i *.1 T.O. T-MOBILE ANTENNAS mf'�f 4'�`�- U �y / i� 90'-0"± AGL h N �`r � `��f � � OF T-MOBILE ANTENNAS ��I C UDF THC STATE�IENT'NISSUED FOR CANSTRUC ION" _� _,,', S _ � _ REMOVED AND REPLACED BY (6) AIR 21 ��uiTw�n�c�a+reac oe u��uso carTir�ec&i�wrc�o �I � ; �} / � �T� � �� ANTENNAS (TYP. � (2) PER SECTOR) CONRRII THEY ARE IN POSSESSiON OP THE UTEST PUNS. p R�• f 12 EXISTtNG T-MOBILE ANFENNAS TO B i, � ' . �\`\\ f � �' �_ . ( i ��4,, r B. � -� �, �' " � � EXISTING 110'-0" MONOPOLE BY OTHERS. \�`- � '`�� I t \�%'f ~\``• � � 80'-0"t AGL� � � � Of EXISTING SPRINT ANTENNAS �Et� A,�e � BY OTHERS �(� � \c� ��,NQER ,9,�qc�� i 1 �� P�' '�C:"r , --, �� EXISTING ANTENNAS BY OTHERS fI� Z , '� � (1) EXISTING + �� „ ; 'i� � � I T-MOBILE 512000 i � __ � � EQUIPMENT CABINET � � '• .' i`.�� ' SET ON CONCRETE � 70'-0"t AGL� �^.''� ' PAO TO REMAIN � � � OF EXISTING ANTENNAS BY OTHERS J' Z �G� '� ' I o �y EXISTING UMTS CABWET ( EXISTWG GPS U NIT TO REMAIN N� ATOP EXISTING CONCRETE � PAD. SEE DETAIL 2/A-2 °�� i EXISTING T-MOBI�E EQUIPMENT CABINET SET J � � ATOP CONCRETE PAD TO REMAIN t ELEVATED CABLE SUPPORT BY j ' i 0 OTHERS ? EXISTWG T-MOBILE RBS3106 ♦ � EXISTING SPRINT EQUIPMENT ! EQUIPMENT CABINET T � . obl e� o ENCLOSURE {�� ' � � '�`` ,i j'; - f ELEVATED CABLE SUPPORT BY OTHERS NortF-�east LLC '�� 3500 SUNRISE HWY. � ,: � i � EXISTING AT&7 EQUIPMENT ��.__.i r �[',� �;�� EXISTWG EQUIPMENT SHELTER BY SUITE D-203 I 3 COMPOUND � �k;{j ;�� 1 OTHERS GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 I� � m } 4{ s �i37 j� ;j�� ; i�� SITE INFORMAITON � t i # - ' ` i�� ; � CUTCHOGUE � NOT : ` � DRAWINGS DEPIC7 THE INSTALLATION OF ANTENNAS, CABLING, ETC. E�� 1 21855 COUNTY ROAD 48 � THAT ARE TO BE PLACED ON AN EXISTING MONOPOLE STRUCTURE. A � STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS, PRIOR .'0 �f��'�� ; � CUfCHOGUE,NY 11935 I � t; ' THE INSTA�LATION OF ANY NEW ANTENNA COMPONENTS, AS REOUIRED �_�;�i � ��, LI-I.�S4¢A I TO EVALUATE THE EXiSTING MONOPOIE FOR ADEQUACY OF SUPPOFT o FOR THE NEWLY APPUED LOADS OF THE NEW EQUIPMENT. ANALYSIS —��-� � , _:�, � DESIGN TYPE � SHALL BE PERFORMEi� BY A NEW YORK STATE LICENSED �' , �C � c PROFESSIONAL ENGWEER. THE EVALUATION REPORT AND REMEDIAL ' `F DESIGN IF REOUIRED SHALL BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY OTHERS. I - '. � i� � �€� LTE MODERNIZATION . � OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING STRUCTURAL � �z € ' E :` _ � ____ -_ — — ADEOUACY OF THE EXISTING MONOPO�E. � .: e � SHEET TITI'E � // 1 1 I� 0 .. f � Z. O_O.� - cRA�E ENLARGED EQUIPMENT PLAN ,N _._ & NORTHEAST ELEVATION __ (� _ SHE6T NUMBER REV. � ENLARGED EQUIPMENT PLAN ��'�� 2 NORTHEAST ELEVATION $ � SCALE�. 1/8" = 1'-0" � CCALE: 1�8��= 1�-0�� 1;�: � � / A L � � �� I , i Clamp A � e � C u E F!o'1 a ` �� 850i0070 -- Ty{x No. . �� , 174 mm� 68 mm 88 mm 55 113 mm � 110 mm�128-f 32 mm� i 26 rtun i :3�' SudaMe tor ma Y d�arnete�.._i_ 55-i t�mm ' _._.. .._ ___..._..._.. " EXISTING ME7AL ANGLE NEW KATHREIN MOUNTING CLAMPS dmenna maudswusF_ i2it is2mm Pleasenote:Kathreindcesnotrecommendtousecounternus. TOP & BOTTOM �/SSOt0070, TOP & BOTTOM. SEE Scopectsu¢piy � �x��"'p txupperuamp DETAIL 3�A-3 Material-CWmp ��'�'Pg�"b°�dn� Replacementofantenna � -Saews FkN•diP 9sh`anizetl steeu StaNess steel —Nuts ; Siainle555leeJ NEW AIR21 AN7ENNA. —____��----.,_—_----- ._--_.__ � SEE DETAIL 1 A-3 `Nc�'� 4.3kg �!�`>. � � �` '+� '�� WILLIAM F. COLLIN$ AIA � A R C H I T E C T S, L L P '- a3� ;`� o � � Ruque � y . '. �,xa0w.� �. . p ' � �y . � ��..� f. 12-7 TECFINOI.00sY DRNE SEIS►UKEC.7V1'll73f 3 NEW KATHREIN �.` - E1�. .�..._�. ,"_l J�; Torquo "�-�� ,^�, volcE.: s31.-6�aqyp Pw7c � 63r6�--8as9 v MOUNTING CLAMPS � � '- ' ""0�"`' f � $ ` http : / / www . wf caia . com L �85��, T�P 8( � / / . � b'�y _'` __ r ` BOTfOM. SEE DETAIL � � .� ,:-, � � v ';g ,,.-'-- WFC PROJF�'I'NO. 14-10707 � 3 A-3 � � ° � ' v / � . � . �`�s "`"� - - � .� �i� HY H�Y o O + 1 w' : ,y ...�' NQ L1�7EI4 SSUmFOR�REIAEW JG ML - O �-a �/ � � f....`�' / � I. ..� 2 Ib i4 SSUEDFOR REMEW JG ML °' O � � : y�T 79�,3BY . . i) '� 3 I I4 L[SUEDFOR REVIEW lG ML � O ,. 1�� m 4 25 14 lS$UEDFOR REVIEW JG ML � � ��'�'il.�� _ Torque � 5 9/IO 14 KSUED FOR RUNG JG Ml � ' ; . � u, aoxT � � �,.�___� .,� �'--�.� . a EXISTING MOUNTING • F - ��' '��}" • �: ' � Torpuo ' , - � / ,� 5) PIPE • , , e = _ M.,ww� � � �G � �^ c ._ �... .... bwerdamP upperdamP ;.- ,.� �� ......a� G _�,�� o �.u � �m ,� .�� -�.� L r � � Y EXISTING MOUNTING PIPE _�r"� ; �t �. �'s i ,- �: ._ ; NOTES; �n 0� , .3 -''D .. � � - , � (1)NO CONSTRUCTION OR BIDDING IS TO PROGEED UNLESS �. - � 'o . ._._. 1) .;, . ..... ..... ' ....PtnpS_INCWDE_IHE...SU7EUENT_"ISSUED..E4R..CON57Rt1GTi0N'...... m _ENLARGED ANTENNA MOUNTtIVG DETAfL � ��,; _ ; "�°^' �- _ _ . £ : �� IN TNE DESCRIPTION COlU1/N ABOVE.PPoOR TO BIDDING OF :. O �' �W„M��H :.� CONSTRUC710N.CONTRACTOR MUST ALSO CON7ACT WFC TO � SCALE: 1-1/2 =��-O `! f! _3 -p q�eript�nu� a)uppmaamp CONFIRM THEY ARE IN POSSESSION OF 1HE IATES7 PLANS. 0 5)lovrer danp v , F ptlontbnl . . t . . . DJno�wW Na�/OlY�ju�. H FaN��+nP��+' M O�Nottllp m0.'�RV n Mc!aNt�es"t atl YIl,wnk�p+en�dr��b,iis U��0!iT. b'�,�.,».�.,�,, ��,��D AACy 1 TYP. ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL TYP. MOUNTING HARDWARE DETAIL ,,� ��NOER MqC �� SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0" `� SCALE: NTS �C'?�Pf .�� Ov � � � . ' • i : � � 2 c-�, Aw� * ! -� 3� ! �i �-., F J '-� '".' ` • � ;.. T+�n+v�'M�nt A��f�at� ATIl�JiIA'l�t'l�t3-'lA�t�.ATI�AR�� ,� .,._., :; . ,�. ,, .._...M�. C g .u �� •+s+.w�«+� �-�� . . . ... �%�.. �-�i v l� .. �y.��y� 7� �. �17R Wll��IIf 117f't. . . � '��-+."�'`'`' J j J �1C tWt tl��t. �,� I � � ��,� '`�' -:...--� 2. �Ri t�1!�lOb[C�if�IS M7�S�!1f1ltfl�YOt1�1$�S/� ! d t ANTENNA � ��_� � ��i� � � 7 ,. ��+� +..w �riH� � � • z' -MFG: ERICSSON � 3' ��t�� T � �Mobile� d -PART NO.: AIR 21 B4A/B2P .��}MlS�tt}kdtt}Y��dG�+�� 'M -- -' � MECHANICAL WFO �Y�R""'y- �3�°`"' Nortf-ieast LLC F -WEIGHT� 105 LBS � q, �Y�fi the 1�b�t a�d rrut ot1 the TMA,r+st dre TMA � � � 3500 SUNRISE HWY. -MAX. WIND AREA: 2.9 SO.FT. ' -MAX. WIND LOAD (@ 150MPH): 580 N �, ��8• �� SUITE D-203 o -MAX. WIND SPEED: 150 MPH b� � 5, p�,�Ft�'16b0�Pt11�'L4f4Htt�1eT�+r1A1M�iF�l�ItltfM ��. �.�. . � -� GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 3 -HARDWARE MATERIAL HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED -� bratiaet.kaeK th!grolx�din9 Stt�P,t�bok�d� ta�ru+:a d -CONNECTOR TYPE� 7--16 DIN, FEMALE (4) � T=„�,.�„�h��j�g}p6�{4S�{-�. � STTE INFORMATION L -COLOR: GRAY / OFF WHITE ��•• ��`�' �; � C�H�,� ` -STANDARD MOUNTING HARDWARE' TM600899A-2 �" �P��T�� - ` � � fee��+d t°the aMem�'Ensure th��► � �; 21855 COUNTY ROAD 48 enna ths .�..,,.. �? � .,__ _ is ptac+ed on th�c�xmactc�rs. � �� 8. Please ernwe tt�at the pr►�ers�oonr�ckd�the �� swr• �` t►« ;s A CUTCHOGUE,IVl(11935 � a.as�t+ua� ' mrn�ct pa2 iolow the p�c+,�i�aa�rs descr�ed�+cfi�e _ ` �"". .� � L.�13-544-A o _. mnnection chart ai d�e a�tt�er si�of this doa.srxnt_ �- a �.� 9. Conn�ctas are to b�e�w�ued tc�2S t�-m t18�f-ft�. ,. ,� DESIGN 'TYPE �t ta g.. i'-o" 7C�.Note:Regar!d'mg theATM4F1d12D-tA20TMA,some �► °� '� �� "�„'" LTE MODERNIZATION � Eriasan BTS's c�supF:IX the OC paa+ret�r�ctly�ra t!� +�y� r� os+rRn - REAR viEw SiDE viEw FRONT viEw p�s�o{i�TMq,thrc,ug},the r�RF keder. �� y� ��►,�aauT� SHE�''T 77TLE pras,,eMing the use od a 8ias-T in tfie PCS branch.�itris +�.s .._. +�+ �� TYPICAL ANTENNA DETAILS case,w�y a►e AISG 2A Bias-T a ne�eded'm the AWS branch of the T►AA. Fa�BTS marwFacturers.two AISG 2.0 Bias-Ts are required.one in each Manch. SHEET NUMBER �. �- POLE MOUNT CONFlGURATION � �4�TMA DETAILS ��A� 2 TYP. ANTENNA_DETAILS A-3 5 SCALE: 1/2��-1'-0" SCALE: N.T_S. t ANTENNA SCHEDULE CABLE SCHEDULE GENERAL NOTES ' , . , J SECTOR MDT TX-RX MANUF - MODEL� CABLE LENGTH DIA. LABEI/NOTE � — ' TX/RX TX/RX EXIST. 1-S/8" 1 RED � - AL� WDICATIONS OF NORTH ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CCNTRACTOR TO - — TX�RX NEyy TX/RX EXIST. t-5/8" 2 RED VERIFY IN FIELD TRUE NORTH PRIOR TO SECTOR ANTENNA INSTALLqTION. SaME -��RX ERICSSON AIR21 TX/RX EXiST. i-5/8" 3 RED 2 - CABLE LENGTHS LISTED ARE APPROXIMATIONS PROVIDED BY OWNER AND TX/RX TX/RX EXIST. t-5/8" 4 RED ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE USED FOR ORDERING CABLE. ALL CABLE LENGTHS - A 20' �C/RX MUST BE VERIFIED IN FIE�D. � SAME ��RX ERICSSON AIR21 3 - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL BRASS TAGS (SUPPUED BY T-MOBILE) AT EACH END OF ALL ANTENNA CABLES DENOTING THE NUMBER OF TAPE W I L L I A M F. C O L L I N S, A I A � TX�Rx MARKING BANDS AND CO�OR OF TAPE MARKING BANDS. A R C H I T E C T S, L L P ' 3 nc/Rx so' FIBER NOTE i MIN. CABLE BENDING RADIUS � TX/RX EXIST. i-5/8'" 1 WHITE 4 - ANTENNA CABLES WILL BE COLOR CODED AT THE ANTENNA, FILTER INJECTION CABINET, JUMPER CONNECTIONS AND THE BTS CABINET. CABLE RADIUS WT.PER FT. O.D. �-�T��oioGY nxrvg ssrwo[a�;rrr u� � L SAME �/Rx N� 7X/RX EXIST. 1-5/8" 2 WHITE vO7CE = 53rca9-6aso Fn7c : 63t-6SQ-sa5v ` TX�RX ERICSSON AIR21 TX/RX EXIST. 1-5/8" 3 WHITE 5 - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL DRIP LOOPS ON ALL ANTENNA AND ��2" CABLE SUPERFLEX (FSJ-4-506) 1 1/4" 0.14 LBS 52" h t t p : / / w w w . w t c a i a . c o m � TX�RX TX/RX EXIST. i-5/8" 4 WHITE JUMPER CABLES. � B 140' Tx�Rx 1/2" CABLE (LDF-4-50B) 5" 0.15 LBS. 0.63" WFC PROIEGT NO. 14-10707 0 6 - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL CABLE SUPPORTS AS NEEDED TX/RX NEyy 7/8" CABLE (LDF-S-SOA) 10" 0.33 LBS. 1.09" � �.� �� n cr�c '' SAME �/RX ERICSSON AIR21 TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM SPACING OF 3'-0'� ON CENTER. Hy ey ` 1 1/4" CABLE (LDF-6-SOA) 15" 0.63 LBS. 1.55" i os ii ia asue�Fotevrs�unnwunr�nEw � nn� 7 - THE CONTRACTOR WILL RECORD THE LOCATION AND SERIAL NUMBERS OF 2 Ob 16 14 tssuenw�t rtFntw � nn� , n TX/RX ALL ANTENNAS, ANTENNA CONTROLLER MOTORS, AND THEIR CORRESPONDING � 5 8" CABLE LDF-7-SOA 20" 0.82 LBS. 1.98" 3 ov i ia ast�Foa r�new � m� TX/RX gp' FIBER NOTE 1 INSTALLED LOCATION AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. a os zs�a ¢st�vFort rt�new .� nn� �„ Tx/Rx EXIST. t-5/8" 1 BLUE CABLE SIZES/LENGTHS 5 �,�o�a �wa Fl�r�,� �� ML � SAME ��Rx N� TX/RX EXIST. 1-S/S" 2 BLUE 8 - ALL ANDREWS MOTORS ARE GENDER SPECIFIC, AND WILL BE WIRED = STARTING WITH THE MALE END OF THE CABLE AT THE BTS AND CONTINUE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED: o TX/RX ERICSSON AIR21 TX/RX EXIST. 1-5/8" 3 BLUE FOR SECTORS 0'-100' USE 7/8" � CABLE m TX�RX TX/RX EXIST. 1-5/8" 4 BLUE ALONG THE RUN fOLLOWING THE 'FEMALE UP RULE'. FOR SECTORS 101'-150' USE 1-1/4" � CABLE , � 260' T��RX FOR SECTORS 751'& ABOVE USE 1-5/8" 0 CABLE SAME ��RX N� , •- TX/RX ERICSSON AIR21 � _ ._ � .._.. ....�/Rx...... ..... NOTES: py�t T • I NO CONSTRl1LTI0N OR BIDDINC IS 70 PROCEED UNLESS � ...... TX�RX. ... 9Q• .... FBER NOTE 1 .. .... . .... . ...... SECTOfI ..�A�. ... .. ..... .... ... . .... . ....SECTVR.....wB�..... .... . .... . ..... .... ..... SEC 1 OR G*.... ..... ..... ... Pl�NS INCLUDE THE STATEMEM"ISSUCD�FdR COtKTROCTION" .... . � o IN THE DESCRIPTION COLUMN ABOVE.PRIOR TO BIDDING OR � � CONSTRUCTION,CONTRACTOR NUST ALSO CONTACT WFC TO CON(IRY THEY ARE IN POSSESSION OF THE LATEST PLANS. r 1 - NEW FIBER CABLE FEEDS POSITIONS 1 & 4. .- ' z z z z z z � � � $ $ $ � .�'�P'E� �'f�C LEGEND W W W w W w � a a a a a a .,�'3 �,j,p.N�lER �yj� � ' � � EXISTING EQUIPMENT, ANTENNAS, CABLES, ETC. TO BE REMOVED vai va'i vai vai va'i vai d1/� � '��_�"' C � � :. C ' L– _J �.. �' t ' '(.1 `-t � EXISTING EQUIPMENT, ANTENNAS, CABLES, ETC. 70 REMAIN � ' �t `� ',�'t C!r'' - .,.��-' J' ,�.// NEW EQUIPMENT, ANTENNAS, OR CABLES � ,K�f ' 'J�`+� ��i � . �;'.r` / � --='_'"~�-'-� , J TMA TMA TMA �- 0 i � t Z EXISTING ER'�SSON T • •Mobile- � RBS3106 UMTS � CABWET + � NortF�east LLC � �o u� NEW HYBRID FIBER 3500 SUNRISE HWY. 3 CABLE SUITE D-203 -a GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 �O - �---oo-- SITE INFORMA'TION � �o�— � CUTCHOGUE -� o--❑ � 21855 COUNTY ROAD 48 CUTCHOGUE,NY 11935 o--oo— - Q �o�__ L.�13-544A - �ac- � DESIGN TYPE a-�� - LTE MODERNIZATION SHEET T1TLE o—oc -- - t --- --- - �--�" ----- -- - 0(�T Q � '(`J'�.; ANTENNA SCHEDULE & ROUTING SCHEMATIC ' � SHEE'I' NUMBER REV. � A_4 5 I L