Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-75.-5-14.1 (2)
MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS l 741 " P.O. Box 1179 q JAMES H.RICH III Southold, NY 11971 Chairman OFFICE LOCATION: MIAJEALOUS-DANK Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY 54375 State Route 25 MARTIN H.SIDOR (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) DONALD J.WILCENSHI wou, Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector From: Heather M. Lanza, AICP, Planning Director Date: February 28, 2025 Re: Planning Department Report T-Mobile Northeast Modifications/Upgrades @ Southold Animal Shelter 41405 NYS Route 25 (aka 165 Peconic Lane), Peconic SCTM#1000-75.-5-14.1 The Planning Board has found that the requirements of the above-referenced T-Mobile modifications and up-grades have been completed based on the site inspection made February 27, 2025. The improvements are in compliance with the General Requirements of§280-70 and the Planning Department Report dated September 15, 2021; therefore, we recommend a Certificate of Occupancy be issued for this application. Thank you for your cooperation.. From: Marie Russo <mrusso@highlanderinc.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2025 10:26 AM To: Lanza, Heather; Cummings, Brian A.; Michaelis, Jessica; Cerezo, Mara Cc: Terry, Mark;Westermann, Caitlin; Palmeri, Allison Subject: FW: L113281 (53095 Rt 25, Southold) Attachments: T-Mobile BP46885_20250129082903.pdf; 1-I13281- CLOSE OUT LETTER-2025-01-27 _S&S.pdf, LI13281 BPrenewed.pdf Good Morning All, We had our final inspection at the above location.The building department is asking for planning to do a final inspection and approval as well, see inspection report, dated 1/8/25. 1 attached the renewed BP together with the engineers sign off letter. I don't have any planning information in my file so I am hoping one of you can help with this?? Thanks, Marie P MC Highlander Consulants, Inc. � � � On behalf of T-Mobile USA FEB 2 6 2025 225 Kingston Dr SOUTHOLD TOWN Ridge, NY 11961 PLANNING BOARD 516-810-1117 -7 s. — — 14- 2— Mrusso@highlanderinc.com From: Marie Russo Sent:Wednesday,January 29, 2025 11:14 AM To:Cummings, Brian A.<brian.cummings@town.southold.ny.us> Subject: LI13281 (53095 Rt 25, Southold) Hi Brian, I hope this email finds you well!! We had our final inspection at the above location.The building department is asking for planning to do a final inspection and approval as well, see attached. I don't have any planning information in my file so I am hoping you can help with this. Thanks, Marie Marie Russo Highlander Consultants, Inc. On behalf of T-Mobile 225 Kingston Dr Ridge, NY 11961 516-810-1117 cell (at soar TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEFT. 631-765-1802 INS"o" PECTION [ ] FOUNDATION 1 ST/ REBAR [ ] ROUGH PLBG. [ ] FOUNDATION 2ND [ ] I ULATION/CAULKING j FRAMING /STRAPPING [ FINAL ld/f [ ] FIREPLACE & CHIMNEY [ ] FIRE SAFETY INSPECTION [ ] FIRE RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION [ ] FIRE RESISTANT PENETRATION [ ] ELECTRICAL (ROUGH) [ ] ELECTRICAL (FINAL) [ ] CODE VIOLATION [ ] PRE C/O [ ] RENTAL REMAIN NFINIGY8 January 27, 2025 Town Of Southold—Building Department Town Clerk's Office Southold, New York RE: Building Construction Permit#46885 T-Mobile L113281 Telecommunication Site 41405 Hwy 25, Peconic, NY 11958(aka: 165 Peconic Ln, Peconic, NY 11958) To the building official, Infinigy has performed a post construction review of the site referenced above. Infinigy issued the drawings for the aforementioned site and as such, we have conducted a final site review for the sole purpose of verifying that the installation was completed in accordance with the site plans. Based on our review of the signed and sealed construction documents for this site issued by Infinigy (Revision 1, 04/28/21),the as-built drawings and post construction photographs provided by the contractor, it is our opinion that the site was built in general conformance with the site plans as prepared by Infinigy. If you have questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Of NEW Robert Baltar, P.E. Al too TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, NY BUILDING PERMIT RENEWED (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES WITH ONE SET OF APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) Permit#: 46885 Date: 09/27/2021 Permission is hereby granted to: Renewal Date: 12/02/2024 Town of Southold Attn: DPW Southold, NY 11971 To: Modification to existing wireless communication tower:T-Mobile(3)new antennas, (3) RRU's, (2) Hybrid feed lines and(3)tie backs( antennea frame stiff-arms)as applied for and per Planning Board approval. Premises Located at: 165 Peconic Ln, Peconic, NY 11958 SCTM#75.-5-14.2 Pursuant to application dated 09/16/2021 and approved by the Building Inspector. To expire on 12/02/2026. Contractors: Fees: Renewal Fee $275.00 Total 275 Building Inspector pest � � TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPT. ' pc-f t,o 631-765-1802 catA+ac f NI a ri e R - %S ( INSPECTION usS C) (5-16) $(D - l I �? [ ] FOUNDATION 1 ST/ REBAR [ ] ROUGH PLBG. [ ] FOUNDATION 2ND [ ] I SULATI N/CAULKING JAI ry sso @ I�►�h (andtf- I nc • c.0 [ ] FRAMING / STRAPPING [ ' FINAL VJ1 [ ] FIREPLACE & CHIMNEY [ ] FIRE SAFETY INSPECTION (O�a _ .��• _ 5 ! ( y ` [ ] FIRE RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION [ ] FIRE RESISTANT PENETRATION T- `lab►(,,� Nor-I-hCc�- [ ] ELECTRICAL (ROUGH) [ ] ELECTRICAL (FINAL) n i NIA, ( � [ ] CODE VIOLATION [ ] PRE C/O [ ] RENTAL �4 (--er4,w �m ©n Jio c nuly Sv b'F' L. Prr M RECEIVED .AN 8to-LT soot old Town -� ` Lof Planning Board DATE A 74 V INSPECTOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, NY BUILDING PERMIT RENEWED (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES WITH ONE SET OF APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) Permit#: 46885 Date: 09/27/2021 Permission is hereby granted to: Renewal Date: 12/02/2024 Town of Southold Attn: DPW Southold, NY 11971 To: Modification to existing wireless communication tower:T-Mobile (3)new antennas, (3) RRU's,(2) Hybrid feed lines and(3)tie backs(antennea frame stiff-arms)as applied for and per Planning Board approval. Premises Located at: 165 Peconic Ln, Peconic,NY 11958 SCTM#75:5-14.2 Pursuant to application dated 09/16/2021 and approved by the Building Inspector. To expire on 12/02/2026. Contractors: Fees: Renewal Fee $275.00 Total S275 Building lnspector P TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, NY BUILDING PERMIT RENEWED (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES WITH ONE SET QF APPRQVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) Permit#: 46885 Date:09/27/2021 Permission is hereby granted to: Renewal Date: 12/02/2024 Town of Southold Attn: DPW Southold, NY 11971 To: Modification to existing wireless communication tower:T-Mobile(3)new antennas,(3) RRU's,(2) Hybrid feed lines and(3)tie backs(antennea frame stiff-arms)as applied for and per Planning Board approval. Premises Located at: 165 Peconic Ln, Peconic,NY 11958 SCTM#75:5-14.2 Pursuant to application dated 09/16/2021 and approved by the Building Inspector: To expire on 12/02/2026. Contractors: Fees: Renewal Fee $275.00 Total S275 Building Inspector r � � MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOAR.D MEMBERS ��F SO(/�'y P.O.Box 1179 DONALD J.WILCENSKI ��� ��O Southold, NY 11971 Chair � � OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMEEtS va � Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY � � �� 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III ��y � (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR �'QU��� Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov PLANNING BOAR,D OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector From: Heather M. Lanza, AICP, Planning Director �j� Date: October 20, 2014 Re: Planning Department Report T-Mobile Northeast at Animal Shelter SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic As an addendum to the attached SPUD, the Planning Department has conducted a review of the proposed modifications pursuant to §280-74 6.(2), and has received a report from our Wireless Technical Consultant, Cityscape, Inc. (see attached report). We have the following recommendations for this application: 1. The proposed T-Mobile modifications and up-grades are in compliance with the General Requirements of§280-70, therefore, we recommend a Building Permit be issued for this application in accordance with the Structural Analysis Report, dated August 19, 2014, and the FCC RF Compliance Assessment and Report, dated August 27, 2014. Thank you for your cooperation. 4 ■ �■���■ �� 0 0 � Q� l �L, ` �,� �P�- Consultants, Inc. �.--�- �, = ...z , _ , ,� , � � � � ' V �� . r ,�, �� OCT 1 � 2�1� � ___� Sout7o�u To��, October 10, 2014 �iannin�$u�ra Ms. Heather M. Lanza,AICP Planning Director Town Hall Annex Building 54375 Route 25 Southold,New York 11971 RE: T-Mobile Applications - SCTM#1000-96.1-19.1 and SCTM#1000-75.5-14.1 Dear Heather, Enclosed please find five (5) copies each of CityScape's review and analpsis submitted by T-Mobile for the above referen.ced applications. Please let us know if you have any questions or comments regarding the enclosed analysis. Sincerely Kay Miles Enclosures 7050 W.Paimetto Park Road#15-652• Boca Raton,FL 33433-3483 Tel:877-438-2851 • Fax:877-220-4593 _ _ . _ ��.�� � � � : L�� � State �►f New lf�rk � � 0 Telecommunications Site Review Consultants, Inc. Equipment Upgrade 7050 Palmetto Park Road#15-652 Boca Raton, Florida 33433 Te1:877.43&2851 Fax:877.220-4593 October 8, 2014 - - ,� � OCT �� 4 201� ; � Heather M. Lanza,AICP ' ___�. _._..._ ,�.r.. ,;,: Planning Director {,� ;�t� ,� ; � _....,..._.._, _.a. ., Town Hall Annex Building N` 54375 Route 25 Southold,New York 11971 RE: T-Mobile Northeast: LI-13-281-A SCTM : 1000-75.5-14.1 • 165 Peconic Lane � �� � y� ��lQ�-�"-� Dear Ms. Lanza, At your request, on behalf of the Town of Southold, New York ("Town"), CityScape Consultants, Inc. ("CityScape") in its capacity as telecommunications consultant for the Town, has considered the merits of an application submitted by T-Mobile Northeast LLC ("Applicant") to make certain upgrades under their modification program referenced as LTE Modernization. The existing subject tower has a total elevation of one hundred thirty (130) feet, and the Applicant's subject antennas are mounted with a radiation center of one hundred seventeen feet and two inches (117.2'); see figure 1. The support structure is located on property owned by the Town of Southold and is located at 165 Peconic Lane in Southold,New York; see figure 2. The Applicant's proposed upgrades will gain no substantial increase in the service area, however the modifications will make it possible for T-Mobile to continue implementing its fourth generation (4('i) advanced services into the Town of Southold. The modifications will include the addition of new antennas, Remote Radio Units (RRU's) and fiber optic cables on the tower. The new antenna configuration will consist of a total of nine (9) antennas, three (3) RRU's, and one (1) new fiber optic cable; see figure 3. The antenna additions will require exchange of current electronic equipment with new 4G electronics, which will occur inside the ground mounted cabinets within the Applicant's existing ground compound space; see figure 4. The Applicant submitted a Structural Analysis Letter dated August 19, 2014 which confirms that the structure will sufficiently support the proposed antenna changes and additions. The proposed modifications will raise the tower rating to 91.9% out of a m�imum of 105% and provides for remaining capacity for future upgrades; see figure 5. Additionally, the Applicant submitted an Antenna Site FCC RF Compliance Assessment and Report dated August 27, 2014, indicating the exposure ratings will remain in the safe category; see figure 6. T-Mobile Northeast: LI-13-2� SCTM : 1000-75.5-14.1 e � � Town of southold,New York Consul�ants, Inc. October 8,2014 Page 2 Telecommunications Site Review New York Equipment Upgrade Although the information submitted by the Applicant was limited, the materials provided were sufficient for CityScape to confirm qualification for streamlined processing and approval under the Middle Class Taac Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 ("Tax Act"). Therefore, according to Section 6409 of the Ta�c Act, CityScape recommends approval of the above referenced application. Respectfully submitted, ,--�,��==''�f' �ri;/,/,,�-- � ���r,���� -.____ . _ __ _ ; Richard L. Edwards FCC Licensed PCIA Certified CityScape Consultants, Inc. T-Mobile Northeast:LI-13-2� � N� SCTM: 1000-75.5-14.1 � O � Town of Southold,New York October 8,2014 Consuitants, 111C. Page 3 Telecommunications Site Review New YoHc Equipment Upgrade EXtSTING AT&T ANTENNAS— EXISTING SPRINT ANTENNAS I. . (6) NEW AIR21 T—IAO&IF . � ANiENNAS MOUNiED TO DtIST1NG PIPE MOUNTS. (1YP. (2) AMfENNAS . PER SECTOR). SEE DETNLS ON 130'-0"t AGL SHEET A-4 fOR MORE � - T.O. EXISTING LATTICE INfORNATION. � ' TOWER, AlT ANTENNAS & ' � " SPRINT ANTENNAS �2 s/`• YYii +_ . ����II.�t�Il�.t$S (3) NEW COAIMSCOPE LNX-8515D5—VIU T—MOBRE ANTENNAS MOUHTED i0 D(ISfING PIPE MOUMS. (TVP• (1) ANTENNA ��EC . PER SECTOR) SEE MITENNA DETAILS � ����i; ON SHEEf A-3 FUR MORE ! � � INFORMA7Kkl. { 10d-0°t AGL � � j � OF EXISTING VERIZON ANTENNAS `if� _{fi1 EXISTING VERIZON ANTENNAS ' .�,,,._.r�ki � ir S` 1� EXISTING 130'-0" HIGH �� 86'-5"3 AGL LATTICE TOWER � OF EXISTING CARRIER ANTENNAS �, �i '�t � � e i (24) EXISTING ANTENNA ���Y'{��•I'� CABLES. (3) TO BE ;�="�=`—r�y SWAPPED WITH HYBRID 1P�.. "�� ����,;'"� '�,.,jf:, i���i �� , 3 `��R*•I j�i �� fl , �a ��:� r, . i��j,.�t ' � ",i i4 TN V� __ (_�i � i 4 �� / ,� i� j;,-' ''• 'j; s,�.—_�:-:���; !f�� �� f+. ii �x;{ j4 i=j._._.� �:�I _. ExISTING At&T EQUIPMENT �}`'^, �����4 SHELTER (BEYOND) �j ,,,=T i� ;, ?; EXISTING T—MOBILE E�UIPMENT. fi ' SEE ENIARGED EOUIPMENT PLAN �,...�. �c �'� 7`•1, �� it�,�'„ - `��c� SHEEf t/A-2 ,p.}�_,�---;� EXISTING SPRINT (t ' �� ti E�UIPA4ENT SHELTER !_ �.,i A ;i i+ ;�i a �.,I..,. / ' "`y� ,r � \ � i � � � � � , $ �._�„ � , ------------- / G Figure 1. Tower Elevation T-Mobile Northeast:L1-13-2� � � � � SCTM: 1000-75.5-14.1 o O � Town of Southold,New York October 8,2014 Consuttants, 111C. Page 4 Telecommunications Site Review New York Equipment Upgrade � DeLwme StreKAWs USA�2009 r; i / � ; �� ti` ��►ese; �`� i� ,, �r,1', .`�, / y��/x ! %' t+i �,;� *'� i I ';� �'�,, � F �G X� r� �f _. .. ��J �T i � i Jk� �.4�� if, f. �°.�t ��.� `9.� r� � . p` � �9`�_ 49L 1�,, :, F � � , ���- � ,� ,/ % . HF � �� �yC'/�}� . r, �''?i . @� ��'s��Q-�;, yfY�`�., � � � . f-�• ',p �J _ �Ir�sGtw . ���1 ✓„/. P �a�; S � � ,.l r/^ ��,b�� . . .�% . � _�,h-��� . �r'F � /� . �/' y�� r`, \` l�x r y.'Cr � to.m a sa,n,ou . .r ''� ��u � .l�l( . .�� .� � . j,� . !i y'' %1 ,.`� j!� �J" ��/ ,.,����h ��f� � ��i �' r o� m y�' �n �L~ o . . � zs r . �p. . .. . . . ��'� � . . � - � . ;r _ ,'f J, ,;! �y / . `f,,, K���y. . . , t`'��,� 3 �, i a r'1` ����ao, o o ; # ;� �� ?o qa�' ;� 'o '���� � n '►o 0 ;��, e Data use subject m kcense � � ft 6 DeLorme.DeLorme SVee[Atlas USM�2009 0 40D 800 1200 1800 2000 www d e i orme.com MN(138°W) Data Zoan 14-0 Figure 2. Site Location -- __ T-Mobile Northeast:LI-13-2� � � SCTM: 1000-75.5-14.1 a � � Town of Southold,New York october g,2ot4 Consultants, Inc. Page 5 Telecommunications Site Review New York Equipment Upgrade (1) NEW T—MOBILE COMMSCOPE I.NX-6515DS—VTM ANTENNA MOUNTED TO D(ISTING PIPE MOUNT (TYP. (1) PER SECTOR). SEE DETAILS ON SHEET A-3 FOR MORE INFORMATION. �'�-"k"';,°''`�,, ��� µ ���;���t �"'~� ^� (1) NEW RRU TO BE INSTALLED. ���`� `�`�,, (�. (t) PER SECTOR). s� ����"�'°�..,� `� � DETAIL 3/A-3 FOR MORE �� ,�°°°'' �,,� � ,,.��:. �, �,�` ���F ��� EXISTING 130'-0" HIGH LATTICE TOWER � (2) NE1N AIR21 T—MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO EXISTING PIPE MOUNTS. (TYP. (2) PER SECTOR). SEE DEfAIIS ON SHEET A-4 FOR MORE INFORMATION. rn NORTH Figure 3. Antenna Configuration T-Mobile Northeast:LI-13-2� N� SCTM: 10(10-75.5-14.1 o O �' Town of Southold,New York october s,2014 Consuttants, Inc. Page 6 Telecommunications Site Review New York Equipment Upgrade � IXlSlll� UMTS C/1BINEf TO REMNN ANO /, �. TQ BE IMERNALLY IdOdFlED % � /' t) EXISTWG 512000 CABINET TO REMAIN XISTING GPS UNIT TO � �� EMAIN % �\ % ,t �\ � �\ /' �\ /' ay M}y . \ j � „ �EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE TO REMAIN T.��.� � /' �' `•--"' -� +\ % �� '� �'�, �/ f``� j` •� EXISTING ACO/TE�CO CABINET // •�� ���� f �� \� � ~'� -� •\ j '� '`,� �,"`` i '� � •\ `. ; �', �\ , , , . . - ' � ' �,�ei i, �� �\ +.�'a- f't �-'tit �� 'a. 1 "�` •� °,y� "'�" vc. �\ � '°`x. - '�"} •� .\ �\ _ .\ \ \ ,,.F `\ •\\'� �'` f{x —._._.J \ ;.,, //" �`�'� �V �`, �_°,,� /� .\ t. , xj` � /. .\ q ;��, /. '� ^, ��,r /' "�,f .\ /� .\ ,\ /' �� �+ EXISTING MEfER & DISCONNECT TO REMAIN /. .� .\ .� � � EXISTING CABLE TRAY TO REMAIN � WORTH Figure 4. Ground Compound T-Mobile Northeast:LI-13-2� �,� SCTM: 1000-75.5-141 _� o O � Town of Southold,New York october s,2ot4 Consultants, Inc. Page 7 Telecommunications Site Review New York Equipment Upgrade C� KM Consulting Engineers, Inc. Wireless Engineering and Project Management August 19,2014 Marjorie Lindsay William F.Collins,AIC 12-1 Technology Drive Setauket,NY 11733 RE: 11-13-281A Southold Police Station 41405 Highway 25 Peconic, NY 11958 KM Project No. 140402.01 Dear Ms. Lindsay, Further to your request, KM Consulting Engineers, Inc. (KMCE) has reviewed drawings, notes, calculations,and photos for the above referenced site. Based on the information received,the capacity of the existing steel self support tower was reviewed to determine if the new proposed T-Mobile installation can be supported adequately. Information reviewed included CDs from William F. Collins, AIA (WFC) dated 7/24/14, structural analysis by KMCE dated 8/3/10, foundation reinforcement drawings by KMCE dated 8/25/10, and site photos. KMCE did not visit the site. KMCE finds the existing steel self support tower acceptable for the proposed T-Mobile installation. T-Mobile is proposing to install(6)Ericsson AIR21 panel antennas(2 per sector),(3)Commscope I.NX- 6515DS-VTM panel antennas (1 per sector), (3) fiber coax lines, (3) RRUs, and remove (6) existing panel antennas and(3) 1-1/4"coax lines. Upon review of the previous calculations by KMCE, the existing steel antenna tower was found to be rated at 91.9%of its capacity. The proposed installation reduces the overall sail area of the T-Mobile installation currently on the tower. As the proposed sail area is less than the existing sail area modeled in the previous structural, the existing steel self support tower will be able to support the proposed T- Mobile installation. Should you have any questions or comments,please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, KM CONSULTING ENGFFNEERS INC. > _ New Tower Rating 91.9% . : � �. �. ' ' �� ` out of a maxirnum 105% �; � � ��� Michael L.Bohlinger P��'.,, r���,,����' Principal `"F, � , e� : NY License No.75700 ` ���°" A " K'\VJFC{Soutlwltl Pdloe StationLL113287A Letler 081914.tlo�ac 9 Forest Lane,Ewing,New Jersey 08628 Tel.(609)538-0400 Fax.(609)538-8853 Email:info@kmengr.com VISIT OUR WEB PAGE C�www.kmengr.com Figure 5. Structural Analysis T-Mobile Northeast:LI-13-2� � � � � SCTM: 1000-75.5-14.1 0 0 � Town of Southold,New York Consuitants, If1C. October 8,2014 Page 8 Telecommunications Site Review New York Equipment Upgrade PINNRC�E TE�ECOIM CrROUP Prafessiona!and Tec�ical5erv;�,es ANTEIVNA SITE FCC RF COMp�IAIVCE ASSESSMEIVT ANd REpORT T�MOb1I.E NORTIIEAST LLC SiTE LI13281A 41405 H ic��wAy 25 PEcoNic, NY Auc�sT 27. 201-F 1-� RId4EdalE .a1fAUE � SUITE ?O9 • GEd�R KN011S, N1 47927 • ��-�51�1530 Figure 6. Human Exposure Calculations T-Mobile Northeast:LI-13-2� � � N SCTM: 1000-75.5-14.1 o O � Town of Southold,New York October 8,2014 Consuitants, 111C. Page 9 Telecommunications Site Review New York Equipment Upgrade �: �.� � t� a ��� � a,��,�.� -.,�,�fi..��^��` �t'� ��� �. � i�n�a ��M�� t' ' `� 5�'�'�- a'�����_.r�: �. 3 kr. �,: �u_ ;t ��: ` , % x, a� . � � +" t'-a i.�x� � W� _ ., ���# ��� � � �§�` a ��` � �� ,� ; ' ,� .,," • -;�a .�� ': �'i� r� ,,'� ,. ` ' �� ? xF'�rJ`k , , tz ....,� F y . -�4`�ay�, # j,� i j ,.. . �� . . � . S . .. . . .�; .. :�a Exhibit A. Subject Facility � � MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOAR.D MEMSERS ��OF SO(/�'yO P.O_ Box 1179 DONALD J.WILCENSKI �0 �� Southold, NY 11971 Chair � � OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY � • �O 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III ���, � (cor. Main R,d. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR C�(f(1�(,� Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov PLANNING BOAR.D OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 19, 2014 Mr. Richard L. Edwards d/b/a CityScape Consultants, Inc. 7050 Palmetto Park Road Boca Raton, FL 33433 Re: Consulting Services for T-Mobile NE at Animal Shelter Located at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic, NY 11958 SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1 Zoning District: R-80 Dear Mr. Edwards: The Planning Board�has authorized your scope of services in connection with the above. This letter will authorize you to proceed with the consulting work as outlined in the Agreement. Enclosed is the approved Purchase Order#27131, $4,000.00, with amount not to be exceeded. Any work beyond this amount must be authorized in writing prior to being started. Also enclosed for your convenience is a Southold Town Voucher Form for your use with each invoice submitted to this department. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at 631/765-1938 between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Sincerely, �.�r�0�l S.�fM� Brian Cummings Planner , Encls. � • � • �. �c���.� �� ������r���� 74 EAST AVENUE,GLEN COVE,NY 11542 TELEPHONE 516.972.6431 ♦ WAYNE.SMITH Q�CIVILSOLUTIONSNE.COM September 12, 2014 BY HAND �i ��� � �� - � ---��� �;� i�„ �l� ,; '; 'I,i� �� ;�' ;, � _ � � ;,,�� � �. SEP 1 2 Z014 Town of Southold �`°�'� Planning Department , � ,��,t„Q,���� ����-�--- � ��r�Urt Town Hall �— �. _ ��3��,�0��o��,� ` Southold, NY 11971 �� ��m���� �� RE: Application to the Department of Building Department for the Wireless Telecommunications Facility at 41405 Highway 25, Peconic, NY 11958 (LI13281) Dear Sir or Madam, As authorized representatives for T-Mobile Northeast, LLC ("T-Mobile") we submit the following documents to replace those documents previously filed on May 8, 2014. An electronic copy was sent via email to Mr. Brian Cummings on September 11, 2014. 1. Drawings by William F. Collins Architects depicting the current design. 5 sets. 2. FCC Compliance Report by Pinnacle Telecom Group. 5 sets. 3. Structural Assessment Letter by KM Consulting Engineers, Inc. 4. Letter regarding the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 ("TRA"). 5 copies. 5. Check payable to Town of Southold in the amount of $4,000 to establish an escrow fund for the Town's wireless consultant's review of this application. Cp . (.a� U� �lC7V5�� �iv�r� �`('�'Y� T� P ���tc� dvt Q�.t� . � ,f � Very trul urs, �� ��?� ��( � {K �\ U ��1 Wayne Smith � . � "_ ��I ',�a �' ,!i1� Submission Without a Cover Letter ,��� .�- , � �� � t� �i � il� �'���� SEP 1 5 2G14 S� •f �� _ 7,at.;��,� _x � Sender: !h r� i n`?i ! C � r;nn,n;;r.:,,r,c•y__..� ..� ��� �� � � ���� .J �� �. .�.___.�.�,_..6. '/ y � L�///'C4.' Sub'ect: y��b S� / � ` �� a2 S� 02 ���i� /�/ ��� � � � �� - gl /� � SCTM#: 1000 - C� �— — ��a�� 1j i �°� /�{, �o/ Date: ����/�(d�' �1 �/J i'1•rr /'� �"�/U�/S� Comments: �� ���Gl/� f � G� !� � � � � � � �-� � �� [o� �K �� � �- � �r��.�o �, � � � `�. � r �`� p�( �jC (>� �2� Yl�' c� �� dWfk � � � / � �`7 (,t1�`��'-� C� U � ` I � . • . MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOAR.D MEMBERS �QF S�(/�'y P.O. Box 1179 DONALD J.WILCENSHI ��� D�O Southold, NY 11971 Chair � � OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS va � Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY � � �Q 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III ��', ,�Q (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR CQU����� Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 5, 2014 Mr. Daniel Gustaferri T-Mobile Northeast, LLC 3500 Sunrise Highway - Suite D203 Great River, NY 11739 Re: Proposed T-Mobile Northeast, LLC Up-grades @ 165 Peconic Lane Located at 165 Peconic Lane, ±230' n/w/o Peconic Lane & NYS Rt. 25, Peconic SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1 Zoning District: R-80 Dear Mr. Gustaferri: The Planning Department is in receipt of an application to up-grade an existing T-Mobile facility and related equipment at the existing site referenced above. Pursuant to §280-130A of the Southold Town Code, the Planning Department is required to provide a brief report to the Building Department concerning the proposed wireless communications up-grades to determine whether they meet the guidelines for wireless facilities. Pursuant to §280-74A(d) of the Town Code, the Planning Board will hire a Technical Consultant to aid in the review of the application and hereby requires the submission of$4,000.00 into an escrow account with the Town Comptroller's Office to cover the cost of the Technical ConsultanYs review. Please remit a check in the amount of$4,000.00 payable to the Town of Southold. Any unused portion of the Technical Consultant's Fee will be returned to you. Our consultant is CityScape Consultants, Inc. They may contact you directly regarding this application. If you have any questions regarding this application or its process, please do not hesitate to call this office. Thank you in advance for your prompt payment. Very truly yours, C���^—�t�'�---� � Brian A. Cummings � Planner P� , �� J�-r � g� � • � , � �� -- a'� o e Consultants, Inc. 7050 West Palmetto Park Road#15-652 Boca Raton,Florida 33433 Te1:877.438-2851 Fax:877.220-4593 LETTER OF AGREEMENT June 2, 2014 JUIV � 5 1iii4 Heather Lanza,AICP, Planning Director Town of Southold r� 53095 Route 25 V� � '"`"""� _..,,� m.� Southold,New York 11971 Re: Agreement between Town of Southold,New York(Town)and CityScape Consultants, Inc. (Consultant)dated March 5,2013 (Agreement) Dear Ms. Lanza, As per the above referenced Agreement between Town and Consultant, Consultant agrees to provide a review and analysis for an Application from T-Mobile NE for modifications and upgrades to an existing lattice tower located at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic,NY, SCTM#1000- 75.-5-14.1. Review services for the Application will be performed at an agreed upon rate of four thousand dollars ($4,000). There will be no additional costs or fees associated with the review of this Application and/or follow-up letters relating to this Application. Consultant will provide the services as outlined in Exhibit A, Scope of Services, of the Agreement. Si cer , . ay iles ____ � � � �� �� �� • • i � - -- FpR INTERNAL USE ONLY _ SITE PLA N USE DETERIII[INATION _ Initial De�ermination � I � - . . ,�.. Date Sent:_ �.Z��.,L� , . Date:__�__��-�—�� `j�f�)�l� �� � ���lC:�'-��a1 �Project�Name: � � . � �,�� c, � ,,, ,� �r� � project Address: � � � � 1�Zoning District: . Suffolk C�u��Tax Map No.:1000=��= —� - . Re est: . (Note: Copy of Buildir�g Permit App lication and suppo�ing documentation a�to �proposed use or uses should be submitted.) . lnitiai Deterrmination as to whether use is permitted: � itial Determination as to wheth�er site plan is required: . � In Signature of uilding Inspector � P�anning Department (P.D.) Referral: � p�te of Commenfi:_� �—�—�- �..D. Date Reeeived:____�__--�-- - Comments: Signature of Planning Dept.�Staff Reviewer Finai Det�rmina� Dafie: / � Decision: � �:...,.,+,�ro nf Rtiilc�ina In�nPct�r • • KM Consulting Engineers, Inc. Wireless Engineering and Project Management April 22, 2014 Mary'orie Lindsay William F. Collins, AIC 12-1 Technology Drive Setauket, NY 11733 RE: LI-13-281A Southold Police Station 41405 Highway 25 Peconic, NY 11958 KM Project No. 140402.00 Dear Ms. Lindsay, � Further to your request, KM Consulting Engineers, Inc. (KMCE) has reviewed drawings, notes, calculations, and photos for the above referenced site. Based on the information received, the capacity of the existing steel antenna tower was reviewed to determine if the new proposed T-Mobile installation can be supported adequately. Information reviewed included CDs from William F. Collins, AIA (WFC) dated 3/7/14, RFDS by WFC dated 1/10l14, structural analysis by KMCE dated 8/3/10, foundation reinforcement drawings by KMCE dated 8/25/10, and site photos. KMCE did not visit the site. � KMCE finds the existing steel antenna tower acceptable for the proposed T-Mobile installation. T- Mobile is proposing to install (6) Ericsson Air21 B4A/B2P panel antennas (2 per sector), install (1)fiber lines per sector, remove the existing (6) EMS DR651802_PL2Q panel antennas, remove(3)existing dd 62 TMAs, and remove(3)lines of 1-1/4°coax lines (1 per sector). Upon review of the previous calculations by KMCE, the existing steel antenna tower was found to be rated at 91.9% of its capacity. The proposed installation reduces the overall sail area of the T-Mobile installation currently on the tower. As the proposed sail area is less than the existing sail area modeled in the previous structural, the existing stele antenna tower will be able to support the proposed T-Mobile installation. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, KM CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. ' 4 F N F�1r � ' � ,G�P���.aoy<�tic�y; ��' � 9 ?� Michael L. Bohlinger, PE � h Principal NY License No. 75700 � � �� A ��s�O o�ss oNP��`'G\a l�,�Z�l��;'� 1� K:1WFC1Southdd poloe Statlon1LN3281A Letter041414.dopc 9 Forest Lane, 6wing, New Jersey 08628 Tel. (609)538-0400 Fax. (609)538-8853 Email: info@kmengr.com VISIT OUR WEB PAGE @ www.kmengr.com � KM Consultin ' � Engineers, Inc. wireless Engineering and Pro�ect Management April 22, 2014 Marjorie Lindsay William F. Collins, AIC 12-1 Technology Drive Setauket, NY 11733 RE: LI-13-281A Southold Police Station 41405 Highway 25 Peconic, NY 11958 KM Project No. 140402.00 Dear Ms. Lindsay, Further to your request, KM Consulting Engineers, Inc. (KMCE) has reviewed drawings, notes, calculations, and photos for the above referenced site. Based on the information received, the capacity of the existing steel antenna tower was reviewed to determine if the new proposed T-Mobile installation can be supported adequately. Information reviewed included CDs from William F. Collins, AIA (WFC) dated 3/7/14, RFDS by WFC dated 1/10/14, structural analysis by KMCE dated 8/3/10, foundation reinforcement drawings by KMCE dated 8/25/10, and site photos. KMCE did not visit the site. KMCE finds the existing steel antenna tower acceptable for the proposed T-Mobile installation. T- Mobile is proposing to install (6) Ericsson Air21 B4A/62p panel antennas (2 per sector), install (1) fiber lines per sector, remove the existing (6) EMS DR651802 PL2Q panel antennas, remove (3) existing dd B2 TMAs, and remove (3) lines of 1-1/4" coax lines (1 per sector). Upon review of the previous calculations by KMCE, the existing steel antenna tower was found to be rated at 91.9% of its capacity. The proposed installation reduces the overall sail area of the T-Mobile installation currently on the tower. As the proposed sail area is less than the existing sail area modeled in the previous structural, the existing stele antenna tower will be able to support the proposed T-Mobile installation. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, KM CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. N ' �� H�'ti� .�- �ae ������ p �� �p '� ,� w ;�^� � �` �'�K ic �,�7 ���" :,. ��, ".� .;�` � n ��^ ti c`�.. -p„ �. K:1WFC1So 'ut-r.�S,t�,',,.� 3281A Letter041414.docx 9 Forest Lane, Ewing, New,Jersey 08628 Tel. (609)538-0400 Fax. (609)538-8853 Email: info@kmengr.com VISIT OUR WEB PAGE @ www,kmengr.com • • TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST BUILDING DEPARTMENT Do you have or need the following,before applying? TOWN HALL Board of Health SOUTHOLD,NY 11971 4 sets of Building Plans TEL: (631) 765-1802 Planning Board approval FAX: (631) 765-9502 Survey SoutholdTown.NorthFork.net PERMIT NO. Check Septic Form N.Y.S.D.E.C. Trustees Flood Permit Examined ,20 Storm-Water Assessment Form Contact: Approved ,20 Mail to: Dan Gustaferri Disapproveda/c 3500 Sunrise Hwy, Ste. D203, Great River, NY 11739 Phone: 516-444-6021 Expiration ,20 Building Inspector APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Date , 20 INSTRUCTIONS a.This application MUST be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 4 sets of plans,accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises,relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and waterways. c.The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application,the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e.No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Certificate of Occupancy. f. Every building permit shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date. If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property have been enacted in the interim,the Building tnspector may authorize, in writing,the extension of the permit for an addition six months.Thereafter,a new permit shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York, and other applicable Laws,Ordinances or Regulations, for the construction of buildings,additions,or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described.The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws,ordinances,building code,housing code,and regulations,and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. T-Mobile Northeast, LLC (Signature of applicant or name,if a corporation) 3500 Sunrise Hwy, Ste. D203, Great River, NY 11739 (Mailing address of applicant) State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder Lessee Name of owner of premises Town of Southold (As on the tax roll or latest deed) If applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer Q�,. (Name and title of corporate officer) Builders License No. Plumbers License No. N/A Electricians License No. Other Trade's License No. N/A 1. Location of land on which proposed work will be done: 41405 Highway 25 (AKA 165 Peconic Lane) Peconic, NY House Number Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. ]000 Section �5 Block 5 Lot 14 . 0 O 1 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot • . 2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy Police station and public utility wireless telecommunication facility b. Intended use and occupancy Public utility wireless telecommunication facility 3. Nature of work(check which applicable): New Building Addition Alteration X Repair Removal Demolition Other Work (Description) 4. Estimated Cost $10, o 0 o Fee (To be paid on filing this application) 5. If dwelling, number of dwelling units Number of dwelling units on each floor If garage, number of cars 6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use. 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front * Rear Depth Height Number of Stories * Existing 131 � -6�� lattice tower (w/ whips to 145 ' ) Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories 8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories 9. Size of lot: Front Rear Depth William M. Beebe, Robert D. Boyd & 10. Date of Purchase ��11/19 6 8 Name of Former Owner Robert E_ Rehm 11.Zone or use district in which premises are s►tuated R-80 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance ar regulation?YES NO X l3. Will lot be re-graded?YES NO X Will excess fill be removed from premises?YES NO X 53095 Route 25 l4.Names of Owner of premises Town of Southold Addt'ess Peconic, NY 11971 phone No. 631-765-1800 NameofArchitectWi�liam F. Collins, AIA Address�?��:1 LechnoVog �D� 631-689-8450 ��,X r'�''lgone No Name of Contractor Address Phone No. 15 a. [s this property within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES NO X * IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES &D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. b. Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? * YES NO X * IF YES, D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16. Provide survey,to scale,with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. l 7. If elevation at any point on property is at ]0 feet or below, must provide topographical data on survey. 18. Are there any covenants and restrictions with respect to this property? * YES NO X * IF YES, PROVIDE A COPY. STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF��F� �((1�l� L N US�Yo�rn being duly sworn,deposes and says that(s)he is the applicant (Name of individuai s�gning contract)above num;u, (S)He is the LESSEE (Contractor,Agent,Corporate Officer,etc.) of said owner or owners,and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application; that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief;and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. Sworn to before me this a 4� day of l� �, 20� N ta Public Signature of Applicant J �1lfE1t DDNOHU� . NotMjl��+lftic-StatR ol Maw'Motic No. Ot�OdZ 11094 Quslifled l�SuMolk County Commisslon Expires 09/08/20„L7 � � y � ;!., r�« �.,- ;d .. ;8 ..'A .� �,�i .� �' Y,.;v.��,� �..� �. .W. �w� '� � � T-Mobile Northeast LLC, a subsidiary of T-Mobile USA, Inc. 3500 Sunrise Highway,Suite D203 Great River,NY 11739 Attn.: Dan Gustaferri September 12, 2014 BY HAND Town of Southold Attn: Town Supervisor 53095 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 Dear Sir or Madam: T-Mobile submitted an application requesting approval to make modifications to the existing telecommunications facility located 41405 Hwy 25, Peconic,NY in Town of Southold for your approval. T-Mobile site ID: LI13-281A As you may know, in February of 2012,the Congress on the United States passed the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012("TRA")(Pub. Law No. 112-96, 126 Stat 156). The TRA contains key provisions that directly affect this application. Specifically, Section 6409(a)of the TRA mandates the grant of requests to place certain collocations and make certain technology upgrades to existing wireless facilities. Under its terms, state and local governments"may not deny, and shall approve, any eligible facilities request for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station." An Eligible Facilities Request is any request to modify an existing tower or base station that involves "collocations of new transmission equipment"as well as"removal" and"replacement"of transmission equipment. Section 6409(a)(2)(A)-(C). As this application fully conforms to the requirements of the TRA, we are requesting immediate approval of this application. T-Mobile is working to respond to unprecedented customer demand for dependable wireless communication services. To meet this demand,T-Mobile is constantly improving its coverage areas and expanding its network capacity to handle the customer calls and a growing use of data. These upgrades are designed to enhance the quality and data handling capacity of the network, provide our customers with mobile access for the phones, laptops and tablets, and ensuring quality LTE coverage. The attached application explains in detail the modifications T-Mobile is proposing for this wireless facility.Thank you for your consideration and approval of this application. We look forward to working with you to provide better wireless services to your community. Sincerely, .�- --- 1 ` �;�� D Gustaferri Manager, T-Mobile Engineering Department 1 � � KM Consulting Engineers, Inc. Wireless Engineering and Project Management August 19, 2014 Marjorie Lindsay William F. Collins, AIC 12-1 Technology Drive Setauket, NY 11733 RE: LI-13-281A Southold Police Station 41405 Highway 25 Peconic, NY 11958 KM Project No. 140402.01 Dear Ms. Lindsay, Further to your request, KM Consulting Engineers, Inc. (KMCE) has reviewed drawings, notes, calculations, and photos for the above referenced site. Based on the information received, the capacity of the existing steel self support tower was reviewed to determine if the new proposed T-Mobile installation can be supported adequately. Information reviewed included CDs from William F. Collins, AIA (WFC) dated 7/24/14, structural analysis by KMCE dated 8/3/10, foundation reinforcement drawings by KMCE dated 8/25/10, and site photos. KMCE did not visit the site. KMCE finds the existing steel self support tower acceptable for the proposed T-Mobile installation. T-Mobile is proposing to install (6) Ericsson AIR21 panel antennas (2 per sector), (3) Commscope LNX- 6515DS-VTM panel antennas (1 per sector), (3) fiber coax lines, (3) RRUs, and remove (6) existing panel antennas and (3) 1-1/4" coax lines. Upon review of the previous calculations by KMCE, the existing steel antenna tower was found to be rated at 91.9% of its capacity. The proposed installation reduces the overall sail area of the T-Mobile installation currently on the tower. As the proposed sail area is less than the existing sail area modeled in the previous structural, the existing steel self support tower will be able to support the proposed T- Mobile installation. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, ,, �::- ° KM CONSULTING EN��S, 11S(6k`"'`a� �'��� /,� a��\ , ��:�` �:�-.�: � �: f►�` �s ,�� �� ,�, ,�$ ;k Michael L. Bohlinger�,.. �., - �,, � Principal ��" ���� �`'� .�� �, � �� NY License No. 75700 ���`'�'�`�����'<�� � al K:\WFC\Southold Police Station�L113281A Letter 081914.docx 9 Forest Lane, Ewing, New Jersey 08628 Tel. (609)538-0400 Fax. (609)538-8853 Email: info@kmengr.com VISIT OUR WEB PAGE @ www.kmengr.com � .M � � T-Mobile Northeast LLC,a subsidiary of T-Mobile USA,Inc. �� � � - , ��` May 7, 2014 �;� ��� �-� ' . �I� , ���;. ���� SEi' 152014 � Town of Southold � ,_ _ _� Building Department � `�t���," > ���� TOWI1 Hdll P�anning 9aar, ��., __.... _,.�._..��.���.. Southold, NY 11971 R�. T-Mobile LI13281A / Upgrade a� Southvid PD Tower / 4i405 Highway 25, Peconi�, NY 1195$ To Whom it May Concern: Enclosed please find the following for Building Permit: 1) Application�1V DUPLICATE, 2� , , , Ft c N�� ��^ b/� 3) Construction Drawings(4 S&S copies}, nec� -� �a�r l���Nr���� 4) Structural Assessment Letter(4 S&S copies), �{ute�+ ����, 5) FCC Compliance Report(4 copies) � Piease review for Permit issuance. Si y, D {-� a � . . oject M ger II •T��•Mobile• � 3500 Sunrise Hwy, Ste. D203 ��� � � Great River,NY 11739 Cell: 631-398-3399 cschaafl ,metropcs.com 3500 Sunrise Highway,Suite D203,Great River,NY 11739 �- . � � TOW1�T OF SOUTHOLb BUTLDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST $IJII.DING DEPA.RTMEiV'1' Do you have or need the followiag,before applyi�? TOWN HAI,.T. Board ofHealth sOUTH�LD�NY 119�1 4 sets of Buildino PtanS TEL:(631)765-180Z Planning Board approvai FAX:(631)765-9502 g��, SoutholdTowa.Nort4�+ork.net PERMI'f NO. �k Sep6c Form N.Y.S.D.E.C. Trustees Flood Pennit Examinsd .�0_ Stomt-WaYer Assessmrnt Form ConMct_ Approved .20_ Mail to:Dan Gustaferri Disapproveda/c 3500 Sunrise Hwy, Ste. D203, Great River, NY 11739 Phone• 516-444-6021 Expiration .�0 Buiiding Inspector APYLICATTON FOR BUII.DIIVG PERMIT 1?ate_ .�0 INSTRUCTIONS a.This application MLJST be completely filled ia by typewriter or in inl:and submitted to the Suildin�Inspector with 4 seis of p]ans,accurate plot plan to scale.Fee aaording m schedule. b.Plot plan showing locatian of lot and of buildin�s on premises,relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas,and waterways. c.The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Buildin�Permit d.Upon approval of this applica2ion,the Building Intpector wili issue a Building Permit to the applicant Such a perniif shal]be kept on the premises available for inspecfion throughout the work. e.No buiiding shatl be cecupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever unh'I the Buiiding]nspector issues a Certificaxe of Occupancy. f.Evay building pe�mit shall expire if the work suthoriud has not commenc:d within 12 months after the date of issuance or has not been compteted within 18 months from such date,If no zoning amendmenu or other regularions affecting the �property have been enacted in the interim,the Building Inspector may authorize,in wri6�&the extension ofthe permit for an addition six months.Thereafter,a new permit shall be rcqnirad. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Deparhnent for ihe issvance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold,Suffoll:County,New York,and other applicable Laws,Ordinances or Reo lations,for the construction of bnildings,additions,or altera6ons or for removal or demolition az herein described.The applicant agrees to comply wifh all applicable]aws,ordinances,building code,housino code,and ree�uulations,and to admit aathorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. T-Mobile Northeast, LLC (Si�naWre ofapp►icanl or namq ifa corporation) 3500 Sunrise Hwy, Ste. D203, Great River, NY 11739 (Mailing address of appiic2nt) State whether applicant is owner,lessee,aaent,architect,engineer,aeneral contraetor,electrician,plumber or builder Lessee Name ofowner of premises Town of Southold (As on the tax roll or latest deed} If applicant is a corporation,signature of duly authorized officer (Idame and title of corporate officer) - Builders License No. Plumbers Lictnse No. N/A � Eloctricians License No. Other Trade's License No. N/A I. L,ocation of land on which proposed work will be done: 41405 Highway 25 (.AKA 165 Peconic Lane) Peconic, tn House Number Street Hamlet County Tax Map No.1000 Section 75 Block 5 Lot 14.ooi Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot �� � � � 2. State cxisting use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of pmposed construc6on a. Existing use and occupancy Police etation and public utility wirele8s telecommunicatioa facility b. Intended use and occupancy �lic utility wir�less teleco�nunication £aeility 3. Nature of work(check which appIicable):New Building AddiUon Alteration X Repair Removal Demolition Other Work 4. Estimated Cost $l0,000 (Description) Fee (To be paid on filing this application) S. If dwelling,number of dwe]ling units Number of dweUing uniu on each floor If garage,number of cars 6. If business,commercial or mixed occupancy,specify natur�e and ea�tent of each type of use. 7. Dimensions of existing structures,if any:Front * Rear Depth Height Number of Stories * Existing 131�- ^ att�ce tower (w/ whips to 145�) Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions:Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories � 8. Dimensions of entire ncw construction:Front Rear Depth Height fJumber of Stories 9. Size of lot:Front Rear Depth William M. Seebe, Robert p, Boyd & lO.DaieofPurchase ��11/1968 NameofFormerOwner �bc rt R RPhm 11.Zone or use district in which premises are situated R-84 12.Does proposed construction violate any zoninp]aw,ordinance or regulation?YES NO X 13.Will lot be re-graded?YES____NO X Will excess fill be removed from premises?YES NO X 53095 Route 25 - - 14.Names of Owner of premises ToY,n of Southold AddiCSS Peconic, NY 11971 [�hORO N0. 631-765-1800 NameOPArChitectwilliam F, Collins, AIA Address1z-a Technolo Dr' neNo 631-689-8450 Name of Contractor Address Phone No. l5 a.Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwattr wetiand?'1'ES Np X *TF YES,SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTE�S&D.E.C.PERMITS MAY BE REQUTRED. b.Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland?*YES NO x *IF YES,D.E.C.PERMTTS MAY BE REQUIRED. . l 6.Provide survey,to scale,with accurate foUndation plan and distances to property lines. 17.If eievation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below,must provide topographical data on survey. 18.Are there any covenants and restrictions with respect to ihis properry?*YES NO X "IF YES,PROVIDE A COPY. STATE OF NEW YORK} SS: COUNTY OF�FFlS�) Tai�l�1� � N�Si 1 f 1YV 1 being duly sworn,deposes and says that(s)he is tho a�licant (Name of individual sigi�contract)above named, (S)He is the �ss� (Contractor,Agrnt,Corporate Officer,etc.) of said owner or owners,and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this appfication; that all statcme�contained in this application are irue to the best of his Iaowledge and belieF and that the work wi11 be performed in the manner set fortb in the application filed therewith. Sworn to before me this �'�iay of � _2p14 1 N PUb11C �E,NNtFERDONDHUE , Si atu��t Notaq•PubGc-State o!Mew Yo+k +No-01 Dp6211094 ' � GusliHpd in Suffotk,County Coo�misaioA Expires 08108M0� , , � • PINNAC�E TE�ECOM GROUp Professional and Technical Services � ANTENNA SITE FCC RF COMp�IANCE ASSESSM ENT ANd REpORT T�MObI�E NORTIiEAST LLC SirE L113281A 41405 HicNwAy 25 PEcoNic, NY AucusT 27, 2014 �4 RIdC�EdA�E AVENUE - SuirE 209 • CEdAR KNO��S� NJ 07927 • 973-451-1630 , � • • CONTENTS INTROdUCTION ANd SUMMARy 3 ANTENNA ANd TRANSMISSION DATA S COMP�IANCE ANA�y515 8 COMP�IANCE CONC�USION 13 CERTIFICATION 14 AppENdix A. BACI(C�ROUNd ON TI1E FCC MPE LIMITS AppENdix B. SUMMARy OF EXPERT QUA�IFICATIONS 2 � • INTROdUCT10N ANd SUMMARy At the request of T-Mobile Northeast LLC ("T-Mobile"), Pinnacle Telecom Group has performed an independent assessment of radiofrequency (RF) levels and related FCC compliance for the modification to an existing wireless base station antenna operation on a lattice tower at 41405 Highway 25 in Peconic, NY. T-Mobile refers to the antenna site by the code "L113281A", and its proposed modification involves the addition of 700 MHz service to the existing 1900 and 2100 MHz operations at the site. The FCC requires all wireless operators to perform an assessment of the RF levels from all the transmitting antennas at a site whenever antenna operations are added or modified, and ensure compliance with the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limit in the FCC regulations. In this case, the compliance assessment needs to include the RF effects of existing panel antenna operations at the site by MetroPCS, Verizon Wireless, Sprint, AT&T, Keyspan Corporation and the Town of Southold. Note that FCC regulations require any future antenna collocators to assess and assure continuing compliance based on the RF effects of all proposed and then-existing antennas at the site. This report describes a mathematical analysis of RF levels and compliance for the area at street level around the site. The compliance analysis employs a standard FCC mathematical model for calculating the effects of the antennas in a very conservative manner, in order to overstate the RF levels and to ensure "safe-side" conclusions regarding compliance with the FCC limit for safe continuous exposure of the general public. The results of a compliance assessment can be described in layman's terms by expressing the calculated RF levels as simple percentages of the FCC MPE limit. If the normalized reference for that limit is 100 percent, then calculated RF levels higher than 100 percent indicate the MPE limit is exceeded and there is a need to mitigate the potential exposure. On the other hand, calculated RF levels consistently below 100 percent serve as a clear and sufficient demonstration of 3 � • i compliance with the MPE limit. We can (and will) also describe the overall worst- case result via the "plain-English" equivalent "times-below-the-limit" factor. The result of the RF compliance assessment in this case is as follows: ❑ At street level around the site, the conservatively calculated maximum RF level from the combination of T-Mobile antenna operations, as proposed to be modified, and the other existing antennas at the site is 0.9540 percent (i.e., less than one percent) of the FCC MPE limit. In other words, the worst-case calculated RF level — intentionally and significantly overstated by the calculations — is more than 100 times below the FCC limit for safe, continuous exposure of the general public. ❑ The results of the analysis provide a clear demonstration that the RF levels from the combination of proposed and existing antenna operations in publicly accessible areas will satisfy the criteria for controlling potential human exposure to RF fields, and the antenna operations will be in compliance with the FCC regulations and limit concerning RF safety. Moreover, because of the conservative methodology and operational assumptions applied in the analysis, RF levels actually caused by the antennas will be even less significant than the calculation results here indicate. The remainder of this report provides the following: ❑ relevant technical data on the T-Mobile antenna operations, as proposed to be modified, and on the other existing antenna operations at the site; ❑ a description of the applicable FCC mathematical model for assessing MPE compliance at ground level around a site, and application of the relevant technical data to that model; and ❑ analysis of the results of the calculations against specified the FCC MPE limit, and the compliance conclusion for the site. In addition, three Appendices are included. Appendix A provides background on the FCC MPE limit, as well as that of the State of New Jersey (see later). 4 � i � Appendix B provides a list of key FCC references on MPE compliance, and Appendix C provides a summary of the qualifications of the expert certifying FCC compliance for this site. ANTENNA ANd TRANSMISSION DATA The table below summarizes the relevant data for the proposed T-Mobile 700 MHz antenna operation. Genera/Data Fre uenc Band 700 MHz Service Covera e T e Sectorized Antenna T e Directional Panel Antenna Hei ht AGL 117 ft. 2 in. to to Antenna Line Loss Conservativel i nored assumed 0 dB 700 MHz Antenna Data Antenna Model Max. Gain Commsco e LNX-6515DS-VTM 15.7 dBi RF Channels per Sector One 120-watt channel The area below the antennas, at street level, is of interest in terms of potential "uncontrolled" exposure of the general public, so the antenna's vertical-plane emission characteristic is used in the calculations, as it is a key determinant of the relative amount of RF emissions in the "downward" direction. Figure 1 on the next page shows the vertical-plane radiation pattern of the 700 MHz antenna model to be used at this site. In this type of antenna radiation pattern diagram, the antenna is effectively pointed at the three o'clock position (the horizon) and the relative strength of the pattern at different angles is described using decibel units. Note that the use of a decibel scale to describe the relative pattern at different angles actually serves to significantly understate the actual focusing effects of the antenna. Where the antenna pattern reads 20 dB the relative RF energy emitted at the corresponding downward angle is 1/100th of the maximum that occurs in the main beam (at 0 degrees); at 30 dB, 5 � • � the energy is only 1/1000th of the maximum. Finally, note that the automatic pattern-scaling feature of our internal software may skew side-by-side visual comparisons of different antenna models, or even different parties' depictions of the same antenna model. Figure 1. Commscope LNX-6514DS-VTM—700 MHz Vertical-plane Pattern � ,� . 0 deg horizon 5 dB/division T-Mobile's operations at the site in its FCC-licensed 1900 and 2100 MHz bands will remain unchanged. In the 1900 MHz band, T-Mobile uses four 15-watt channels and one 40-watt channel (for a total of 100 watts per sector). In the 2100 MHz band, T-Mobile uses two 40-watt channels and one 20-watt channel (for a total of 100 watts per sector). The existing antenna model is Ericsson AIR21. As noted at the outset, there are existing antenna operations to include in the compliance assessment. For each of the wireless carriers, we will conservatively assume operation with maximum channel capacity and at maximum transmitter power in each of their respective FCC-licensed frequency bands. For each of the other operators, we will rely on the transmission parameters in their respective FCC licenses. s � • MetroPCS is licensed to transmit in the 2100 MHz frequency band, and uses three 24-watt channels and one 60-watt channel in each antenna sector. Verizon is licensed to operate in the 700, 850, 1900 and 2100 MHz frequency bands. In the 700 MHz band, Verizon uses one RF channel per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 40 watts. In the 850 MHz band, Verizon uses as many as eight RF channels per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 20 watts. In the 1900 MHz band, Verizon uses as many as four RF channels per antenna sector, with a maximum of 16 watts of transmitter power per channel. In the 2100 MHz band, Verizon uses two 40-watt RF channels per sector. Sprint is licensed to operate in both the 862 and 1900 MHz frequency bands. In the 862 MHz band, Sprint uses one RF channel per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 20 watts. In the 1900 MHz band, Sprint uses as many as six RF channels per antenna sector, with a maximum of 16 watts of transmitter power per channel. AT&T is licensed to operate in the 700, 850, and 1900 MHz frequency bands. In the 700 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as two RF channels per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 40 watts. In the 850 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as eight RF channels per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 20 watts. In the 1900 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as four RF channels per antenna sector, with a maximum of 16 watts of transmitter power per channel. FCC licensing records show Keyspan Corporation is licensed to operate in both the 150 MHz and 450 MHz frequency bands. In the 150 MHz band it operates with a maximum transmitter power of 100 watts. In the 450 MHz band, it operates with a maximum transmitter power of 75 watts. FCC licensing records show the Town of Southold is licensed to operate in the 450 MHz band, with a maximum transmitter power of 15 watts. � . � • COMp�IANCE ANA�y515 FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin 65 ("OET Bulletin 65") provides guidelines for mathematical models to calculate the RF levels at various points around transmitting antennas. At street level around an antenna site (in what is called the "far field" of the antennas), the RF levels are directly proportional to the total antenna input power and the relative antenna gain in the downward direction of interest — and the levels are otherwise inversely proportional to the square of the straight-line distance to the antenna. Conservative calculations also assume the potential RF exposure is enhanced by reflection of the RF energy from the intervening ground. Our calculations will assume a 100% "perfecY', mirror-like reflection, which is the absolute worst-case scenario. The formula for street-level MPE compliance calculations for any given antenna operation is as follows: MPE% _ (100 * TxPOwe�* 10 �GmaX-vdisc�/�o * 4 ) / ( MPE *4� * Rz ) where MPE% = RF level, expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit applicable to continuous exposure of the general public 100 = factor to convert the raw result to a percentage TxPower = maximum net power into antenna sector, in milliwatts, a function of the number of channels per sector, the transmitter power per channel, and line loss 10 �cmaX-va�s�>�,o = numeric equivalent of the relative antenna gain in the downward direction of interest; pattern data is taken from the antenna manufacturer specifications 4 = factor to account for a 100-percent-efficient energy reflection from the ground, and the squared relationship between RF field strength and power density (2z= 4) MPE = FCC general population MPE limit R = straight-line distance from the RF source to the point of interest, centimeters s � • The MPE% calculations are perFormed out to a distance of 500 feet from the facility to points 6.5 feet (approximately two meters, the FCC-recommended standing height) off the ground, as iltustrated in Figure 2, below. The 500-foot distance is chosen so as to capture the worst-case RF effect of the antennas, given the height of the antenna and the vertical-plane pattern effects. antenna height from antenna R bottom to 6.5'above ground level � 500 Ground Distance D from the site Figure 2. Street-level MPE%Calculation Geometry It is popularly understood that the farther away one is from an antenna, the lower the RF level — which is generally but not universally correct. The results of MPE% calculations fairly close to the site will reflect the variations in the vertical- plane antenna pattern as well as the variation in straight-line distance to the antennas. Therefore, RF levels may actually increase slightly with increasing distance within the range of zero to 500 feet from the site. As the distance approaches 500 feet and beyond, though, the antenna pattern factor becomes less significant, the RF levels become primarily distance-controlled, and as a result the RF levels generally decrease with increasing distance. 9 • • According to the FCC, when directional antennas such as panels are used, compliance assessments are based on the RF effect of a single, facing, antenna sector — because the RF contributions of directional antennas facing away from the point of interest are considered insignificant. FCC compliance for a collocated antenna site is assessed in the following manner. At each distance point along the ground, an MPE% calculation is made for the RF contribution of each operator's antennas, and the sum of the individual MPE% contributions at each point is compared to 100 percent, which serves as the normalized reference for the FCC MPE limit. We refer to the sum of the individual MPE% contributions as "total MPE%", and any calculated MPE% total MPE% result exceeding 100 percent is, by definition, higher than the FCC limit and represents non-compliance and a need to mitigate the RF levels. If, on the other hand, all results are below 100 percent, that set of results serves as a demonstration of compliance with the MPE limit. Note that the following conservative methodology and operational assumptions are incorporated into the MPE% calculations on a general basis: 1. The antennas are assumed to be operating continuously at maximum power, and the power-attenuation effects of antenna cabling ("antenna line loss") are ignored. 2. The power-attenuation effects of any shadowing or visual obstruction to a line-of-sight path from the antennas to the points of interest at ground level are ignored. 3. The calculations intentionally minimize the distance factor (R) by assuming a 6'6" human and performing the calculations from the bottom (rather than the centerline) of each party's lowest-mounted antenna, as applicable. 4. The potential RF exposure at ground level is assumed to be 100-percent enhanced (increased) via a "perFect" field reflection from the ground itself. 10 � • • The net result of these assumptions is to intentionally and significantly overstate the calculated RF levels relative to the levels that will actually result from the antenna operations — and the purpose of this conservatism is to allow very "safe- side" conclusions about compliance. The table on the next page provides the results of the street-level MPE% calculations for each operator, with the maximum (worst-case) result highlighted in bold in the last column. 11 Ground T-Mobile T-Mobile T-Mobile Town of Distance roposed Existing Existing MetroPCS Verizon Sprint AT8�T Keyspan Total �ft� 700 MHz 1900 MHz 2100 MHz MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% Southold MpE% ' MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% � 0 0.0078 0.0026 0.0199 0.0179 0.1654 0.0019 0.0084 0.0024 0.0004 0.2267 20 0.0219 0.0098 0.0351 0.0242 0.0715 0.0033 0.0219 0.0258 0.0011 0.2146 40 0.0312 0.0024 0.0227 0.3138 0.0497 0.0410 0.0536 0.0673 0.0027 0.5844 • 60 0.0096 0.0004 0.0392 0.0721 0.1929 0.0487 0.0826 0.0854 0.0032 0.5341 80 0.0612 0.0060 0.1167 0.0895 0.0926 0.0058 0.0586 0.0882 0.0094 0.5280 100 0.0466 0.0217 0.1798 0.0824 0.0200 0.0228 0.1344 0.0150 0.0020 0.5247 120 0.0198 0.0137 0.1274 0.0577 0.2250 0.0113 0.1868 0.0409 0.0059 0.6885 140 0.0327 0.0023 0.0528 0.0530 0.4248 0.0249 0.2034 0.0810 0.0055 0.8804 ' 160 0.0116 0.0079 0.0360 0.0498 0.5287 0.0084 0.2026 0.1054 0.0036 0.9540 180 0.0055 0.0118 0.0739 0.0839 0.4308 0.0121 0.2169 0.1031 0.0019 0.9399 200 0.0284 0.0125 0.1126 0.0679 0.2861 0.0266 0.2113 0.0868 0.0009 0.8331 220 0.0362 0.0010 0.1109 0.0255 0.1595 0.0125 0.1911 0.0758 0.0031 0.6156 240 0.0387 0.0096 0.0872 0.0227 0.0715 0.0106 0.1685 0.0890 0.0096 0.5074 260 0.0427 0.0069 0.0644 0.0578 0.0485 0.0129 0.1418 0.0845 0.0122 0.4717 280 0.0786 0.0001 0.0287 0.0666 0.0441 0.0143 0.0980 0.0665 0.0103 0.4072 300 0.1006 0.0023 0.0125 0.0620 0.1019 0.0094 0.0713 0.0343 0.0055 0.3998 320 0.1203 0.0041 0.0027 0.0481 0.1537 0.0008 0.0422 0.0242 0.0036 0.3997 340 0.1320 0.0023 0.0010 0.0326 0.1374 0.0011 0.0366 0.0267 0.0035 0.3732 3 60 0.1304 0.0000 0.0080 0.0292 0.1923 0.0040 0.0391 0.0475 0.0062 0.4567 . 380 0.1132 0.0034 0.0250 0.0197 0.2628 0.0074 0.0482 0.0681 0.0085 0.5563 ' 400 0.0813 0.0122 0.0491 0.0178 0.3187 0.0102 0.0652 0.0859 0.0100 0.6504 I 420 0.0742 0.0112 0.0448 0.0146 0.2905 0.0093 0.0596 0.0996 0.0103 0.6141 � 440 0.0408 0.0182 0.0745 0.0134 0.3420 0.0121 0.0857 0.1058 0.0090 0.7015 460 0.0105 0.0167 0.0685 0.0162 0.3140 0.0165 0.1186 0.0974 0.0083 0.6667 I 480 0.0097 0.0150 0.1008 0.0149 0.3557 0.0152 0.1095 0.1008 0.0065 0.7281 � 500 0.0014 0.0066 0.1376 0.0261 0.3286 0.0219 0.1601 0.0934 0.0061 OJ818 12 { • � As indicated, the maximum calculated result is 0.9540 percent of the FCC MPE limit—well below the 100-percent reference for compliance. A graph of the overall calculation results, provided below, provides perhaps a clearer visual illustration of the insignificance of the calculated RF levels. The line representing the calculation results barely noticeably rises above the baseline, and shows an obviously clear, consistent margin to the FCC MPE limit. COMPLIANCEASSESSMENT RESULTS � Normalized FCC MPE Limit �� Total MPE% Results 120 a 100 � a 80 0 a so _ a� C7 40 � 0 � 20 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 Distance(ft) COMP�IANCE CONC�USION According to the FCC, the MPE limit has been constructed in such a manner that continuous human exposure to RF fields up to and including 100 percent of the limit is acceptable and safe. The conservative analysis in this case shows that the maximum calculated RF level from the combination of proposed and existing antenna operations at the site is 0.9540 percent of the FCC MPE limit. In other words, the worst-case calculated RF level is more than 100 times below the FCC MPE limit. 13 .; . • • The results of the calculations indicate clear compliance with the FCC MPE regulations and safety limit. Moreover, because of the extremely conservative calculation methodology and operational assumptions we applied in the analysis, RF levels actually caused by the antennas will be significantly lower than the calculation results here indicate. CERTIfICAT10N It is the policy of Pinnacle Telecom Group that all FCC RF compliance assessments are reviewed, approved, and signed by the firm's Chief Technical Officer, who certifies as follows: 1. I have read and fully understand the FCC regulations concerning RF safety and the control of human exposure to RF fields (47 CFR 1.1301 et seq). 2. To the best of my knowledge, the statements and information disclosed in this report are true, complete and accurate. 3. The analysis of site RF compliance provided herein is consistent with the applicable FCC regulations, additional guidelines issued by the FCC, and industry practice. 4. The results of the analysis indicate that the subject antenna operations will be in full compliance with the FCC regulations concerning potential human exposure to the RF emissions from antennas. 8/27/14 Da ' J Collins Date Chief Technical Officer Pinnacle Telecom Group, LLC 14 ___ __ _ __ ti e . • AppENdix A. BACICC�ROUNd ON TI1E FCC MPE LIMITS FCC Ru/es and Regulations As directed by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the FCC has estabfished limits for maximum continuous human exposure to RF fields. The FCC maximum permissible exposure (MPE) limits represent the consensus of federal agencies and independent experts responsible for RF safety matters. Those agencies include the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In formulating its guidelines, the FCC also considered input from the public and technical community— notably the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). The FCC's RF exposure guidelines are incorporated in Section 1.301 et seq of its Rules and Regulations (47 CFR 1.1301-1.1310). Those guidelines specify MPE limits for both occupational and general population exposure. The specified continuous exposure MPE limits are based on known variation of human body susceptibility in different frequency ranges, and a Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) of 4 watts per kilogram, which is universally considered to accurately represent human capacity to dissipate incident RF energy (in the form of heat). The occupational MPE guidelines incorporate a safety factor of 10 or greater with respect to RF levels known to represent a heafth hazard, and an additional safety factor of five is applied to the MPE limits for general population exposure. Thus, the general population MPE limit has a built-in safety factor of more than 50. The limits were constructed to appropriately protect humans of both sexes and all ages and sizes and under all conditions — and continuous exposure at levels equal to or below the applicable MPE limits is considered to result in no adverse health effects or even health risk. The reason for two tiers of MPE limits is based on an understanding and assumption that members of the general public are unlikely to have had appropriate RF safety training and may not be aware of the exposures they receive; occupational exposure in controlled environments, on the other hand, is assumed to involve individuals who have had such training, are aware of the exposures, and know how to maintain a safe personal work environment. The FCC's RF exposure limits are expressed in two equivalent forms, using alternative units of field strength (expressed in volts per meter, or V/m), and power density (expressed in milliwatts per square centimeter, or mW/cmz). The table on the next page lists the FCC limits for both occupational and general population exposures, using the mW/cm2 reference, for the different radio frequency ranges. 15 _ , . � • • Frequency Range(F) Occupational Exposure General Public Exposure (MHz) (mWlcmz) (mWlcm2) 0.3 - 1.34 100 100 1.34 - 3.0 100 180/ F2 3.0 - 30 900/ F2 180 / F2 30 - 300 1.0 0.2 300 - 1,500 F /300 F/ 1500 1,500 - 100,000 5.0 1.0 The diagram below provides a graphical illustration of both the FCC's occupational and general population MPE limits. Power Density (mW/cm2) 100 Occupational � , � , ��� --------- General Public . � . . � 5.0 ' , , . , , , � , 1.0 `, , �--------� , , , , , , . � ; , , , , 0.2 , , �--------, I I I I I I I 0.3 1.34 3.0 30 300 1,500 100,000 Frequency(MHz) Because the FCC's RF exposure limits are frequency-shaped, the exact MPE limits applicable to the instant situation depend on the frequency range used by the systems of interest. 16 � _ __ .• � • • The most appropriate method of determining RF compliance is to calculate the RF power density attributable to a particular system and compare that to the MPE limit applicable to the operating frequency in question. The result is usually expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit. For potential exposure from multiple systems, the respective percentages of the MPE limits are added, and the total percentage compared to 100 (percent of the limit). If the result is less than 100, the total exposure is in compliance; if it is more than 100, exposure mitigation measures are necessary to achieve compliance. Note that the FCC "categorically excludes" all "non-building-mounted" wireless antenna operations whose mounting heights are more than 10 meters (32.8 feet) from the routine requirement to demonstrate compliance with the MPE limit, because such operations "are deemed, individually and cumulatively, to have no significant effect on the human environment". The categorical exclusion also applies to all point-to-point antenna operations, regardless of the type of structure they're mounted on. Note that the FCC considers any facility qualifying for the categorical exclusion to be automatically in compliance. FCC References on Compliance 47 CFR, FCC Rules and Regulations, Part 1 (Practice and Procedure), Section 1.1310 (Radiofrequency radiation exposure limits). FCC Second Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FCC 97-303), In the Matter of Procedures for Reviewing Requests for Relief From State and Local Regulations Pursuant to Section 332(c)(7)(B)(v) of the Communications Act of 1934 (WT Docket 97-192), Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation (ET Docket 93-62), and Petition for Rulemaking of the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association Concerning Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Preempt State and Local Regulation of Commercial Mobile Radio Service Transmitting Facilities, released August 25, 1997. FCC First Memorandum Opinion and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, released December 24, 1996. FCC Report and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, released August 1, 1996. FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields", Edition 97-01, August 1997. 17 s . � • � AppENdix B. SUMMARy OF EXPERT QUA�IFICATIONS Daniel J. Collins, Chief Technical Officer, Pinnacle Telecom Group, LLC Synopsis: •40+years of experience in all aspects of wireless system engineering, related regulation, and RF exposure • Has performed or led RF exposure compliance assessments on more than 17,000 antenna sites since the latest FCC regulations went into effect in 1997 � Has provided testimony as an RF compliance expert more than 1,400 times since 1997 •Have been accepted as an FCC compliance expert in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Pennsylvania and more than 40 other states, as well as b the FCC Education: • B.E.E., City College of New York (Sch. Of Eng.), 1971 •M.B.A., 1982, Fairleigh Dickinson University, 1982 •Bronx Hi h School of Science, 1966 Current Responsibilities: • Leads all PTG staff work involving RF safety and FCC compliance, microwave and satellite system engineering, and consultin on wireless technolo and re ulation Prior Experience: • Edwards & Kelcey, VP—RF Engineenng and Chief Information Technology Officer, 1996-99 •Bellcore (a Bell Labs offshoot after AT&T's 1984 divestiture), Executive Director—Regulation and Public Policy, 1983-96 •AT&T(Corp. HQ), Division Manager—RF Engineering, and Director—Radio Spectrum Management, 1977-83 •AT&T Long Lines, Group Supervisor—Microwave Radio S stem Desi n, 1972-77 Specific RFSafety/ • Involved in RF exposure matters since 1972 Compliance Experience: . Have had lead corporate responsibility for RF safety and compliance at AT&T, Bellcore, Edwards & Kelcey, and PTG •While at AT&T, helped develop the mathematical models later adopted by the FCC for predicting RF exposure • Have been relied on for compliance by all major wireless carriers, as well as by the federal government, several state and local govemments, equipment manufacturers, system inte rators, and other consultin /en ineerin firms Other Background: •Author, Microwave System Engineering(AT&T, 1974) •Co-author and executive editor, A Guide to New Technologies and Services (Bellcore, 1993) •National Spectrum Management Association (NSMA)— former three-term President and Chairman of the Board of Directors; was founding member, finrice-elected Vice President, long-time member of the Board, and was named an NSMA Fellow in 1991 •Published more than 35 articles in indust ma azines 18 � . • • PINNACLE TELECOM GROUp Professional and Technical Services ANTENNA SITE FCC RF COMp�IANCE ASSESSMENT ANd REpORT T�MObI�E NORTIiEAST LLC SiTE LI-13-281A 41405 HicNvuAy 25 PEcoNic, NY MaacN 24, 2014 14 RidGEdalE AvENUE - SuirE 209 • CEdAR KNolls, NJ 07927 • 973-451-1630 --_ , . � � CONTENTS INTROdUCTION ANd SUMMARY 3 ANTENNA ANCI TRANSMISSION DATA 5 COMP�IANCE ANA�y515 8 COMP�IANCE CONC�USION 13 CERTIFICATION �4 AppENdix A. BACICC�ROUNd ON TIiE FCC MPE LIMIT AppENdix B. SUMMARY OF EXPERT QUAIIFICATIONS 2 : , • � INTROdUCTION ANd SUMMARY At the request of T-Mobile Northeast LLC ("T-Mobile"), Pinnacle Telecom Group has performed an independent expert assessment of radiofrequency (RF) levels and related FCC compliance for the modification of a wireless base station antenna operation on an existing lattice tower at 41405 Highway 25 in Peconic, NY. T-Mobile refers to the antenna site by the code "LI-13-281A", and the modification involves an upgrade of its wireless services and reconfiguration of its RF channels in the 1900 MHz and 2100 M Hz frequency bands. The FCC requires all wireless operators to perform an assessment of the RF levels from all the transmitting antennas at a site whenever antenna operations are added or modified, and ensure compliance with the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limit in the FCC regulations. In this case, the compliance assessment needs to include the RF effects of existing panel antenna operations at the site by MetroPCS, Verizon Wireless, Sprint, AT&T, Keyspan Corporation and the Town of Southold. Note that FCC regulations require any future antenna collocators to assess and assure continuing compliance based on the RF effects of all proposed and then-ex isting antennas at the site. This report describes a mathematical analysis of compliance with the FCC MPE limit for safe continuous exposure of the general public. The RF effects of the antennas are calculated using a standard FCC formula — and the analysis is designed to conservatively overstate the RF levels that actually occur from the antennas. In that way, though, as long as the results indicate RF levels below the MPE limit, we can have great confidence the compliance requirement is satisfied. The results of a compliance assessment can be explained in layman's terms by describing the calculated RF levels as simple percentages of the FCC MPE limit. If the reference for that limit is 100 percent, then calculated RF levels higher than 100 percent indicate the MPE limit is exceeded, while calculated RF levels consistently lower than 100 percent serve as a clear and sufficient demonstration of compliance with the MPE limit. We will also describe the overall worst-case calculated result via the"plain-English" equivalent"times-below-the-limit factor". 3 . , . � The result of the compliance assessment in this case is as follows: ❑ The conservatively calculated maximum RF level from the combination of the proposed and existing antenna operations at the site is 0.9424 percent (i.e., less than one percent) of the FCC MPE limit. In other words, the worst-case calculated RF level — even intentionally overstated by the calculations — is still more than 106 times below the FCC limit for safe continuous exposure of the general public to the RF emissions from antennas. ❑ The results of the analysis provide a clear demonstration that the RF levels from the combination of proposed and existing antenna operations satisfy the criteria for controlling potential human exposure to RF emissions, and the proposed and existing antenna operations will be in compliance with the FCC regulations and limits concerning RF safety. Moreover, because of the conservative methodology and operational assumptions applied in the analysis, the RF levels actually caused by the antennas will be even less significant than these calculation results indicate. The remainder of this report provides the following: ❑ relevant technical data on the T-Mobile antenna operation at the site, as proposed to be modified, as well as on the existing antenna operations; ❑ a description of the applicable FCC mathematical model for assessing MPE compliance, and application of the relevant technical data to that model; and ❑ analysis of the results of the calculations, and the compliance conclusion for the site. In addition, two Appendices are included. Appendix A provides background on the FCC MPE limit along with a list of key references. Appendix B provides a summary of the expert qualifications of the individual certifying compliance for the subject antenna site. 4 . , � � ANTENNA ANd TRANSMISSION DATA The table below summarizes the technical data for the T-Mobile antenna operation, as proposed to be modified. ;,. ...� <, z .�� :� t >� ��" � � �� > , General Data �.� �����y � � � � �,� t . :. . � •; r� � �. :. �....: �' � m: , .� ,�s� t t,-� Fre uenc Bands 1900 M Hz and 2100 M Hz Service Covera e T e Sectorized Antenna T e Directional Panel Antenna Model Ericsson AIR21 Antenna Centerline Hei ht AGL 115 ft. Antenna Line Loss Conservativel i nored assumed 0 dB � . ._. .. _ ...... t������ �..._. ��,� �_'� �-. �. 1900 MHz Data �.>r . .ta tr�� r. tr �'".x^e `� ��.�cr„ ��,''�;. Maximum Antenna Gain 17.7 dBi RF Channels er Sector 4 at 15 watts, and 1 at 40 watts 100 watts total 2100 MHz Data � �h��� � - h "� ;� � ,� .� �.. Maximum Antenna Gain 1�7.6 dBi RF Channels er Sector 2 at 40 watts, and 1 at 20 watts 100 watts total .- , ._ . . . �,� ��� r.. �. �., .r.�� ,�� ��; �,�,;�„�. The area below the antennas, at street level, is of interest in terms of potential "uncontrolled" exposure of the general public, so the antenna's vertical-plane emission characteristic is used in the calculations, as it is a key determinant of the relative amount of RF emissions in the"downward"direction. Figures 1 and 2 on the next page sh ow the vertical-plane radiation patterns of the proposed T-Mobile antenna model in each frequency band. In this type of antenna radiation pattern diagram, the antenna is effectively pointed at the three o'clock position (the horizon) and the pattern at different angles is described using decibel units. Note that the automatic pattern-scaling feature of our internal software may skew side-by-side visual comparisons of different antenna models, or even different parties' depictions of the same antenna model. 5 � T • � Figure 1. Ericsson AIR21 Antenna—1900 MHz Verticai-plane Radiation Pattern 0 deg ho rizo n 5 dB/division Figure 2. Ericsson AIR21 Antenna—2100 MHz Vertical-plane Radiation Pattern 0 deg horizon 5 dB/division 6 � � • � As noted at the outset, there are existing antenna operations to include in the compliance assessment. For each of the wireless carriers, we will conservatively assume operation with maximum channel capacity and at maximum transmitter power in each of their respective FCC-licensed frequency ba nds. For each of the other operators, we will rely on the transmission parameters in their respective FCC licenses. MetroPCS is licensed to transmit in the 2100 MHz frequency band, and uses three 24-watt channels and one 60-w att channel in each antenna sector. Verizon is licensed to operate in the 700, 850, 1900 and 2100 MHz frequency bands. In the 700 MHz band, Verizon uses one RF channel per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 40 watts. In the 850 MHz band, Verizon uses as many as eight RF channels per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 20 watts. In the 1900 MHz band, Verizon uses as many as four RF channels per antenna sector, with a maximum of 16 watts of transmitter power per channel. In the 2100 MHz band, Verizon uses two 40-watt RF channels per sector. Sprint is licensed to operate in both the 862 and 1900 MHz frequency bands. In the 862 MHz band, Sprint uses one RF channel per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 20 watts. In the 1900 MHz band, Sprint uses as many as six RF channels per antenna sector, with a maximum of 16 watts of transmitter power per channel. AT&T is licensed to operate in the 700, 850, and 1900 MHz frequency bands. In the 700 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as two RF channels per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 40 watts. In the 850 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as eight RF channels per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 20 watts. In the 1900 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as four RF channels per antenna sector, with a maximum of 16 watts of transmitter power per channel. FCC licensing records show Keyspan Corporation is licensed to operate in both 7 . . • � the 150 MHz and 450 MHz frequency bands. In the 150 MHz band it operates with a maximum transmitter power of 100 watts. In the 450 MHz band, it operates with a maximum transmitter power of 75 watts. FCC licensing records show the Town of Southold is licensed to operate in the 450 MHz band, with a maximum transmitter power of 15 watts. COMPLIANCE ANA�yS15 FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin 65 ("OET Bulletin 65") provides guidelines for mathematical models to calculate the RF levels at various points around transmitting antennas. At street level around an antenna site (in what is called the "far field" of the antennas), the RF levels are directly proportional to the total antenna input power and the relative antenna gain in the downward direction of interest — and the levels are otherwise inversely proportional to the square of the straight-line distance to the antenna. Conservative calculations also assume the potential RF exposure is enhanced by reflection of the RF energy from the ground. Our calculations will assume a 100% "perfecY' reflection, the worst-case approach. The formula for street-level MPE compliance calculations for any given wireless antenna operati on is as follows: MPE% _ (100*TxPOwel'" �O�Gmax-Vdisc)/10 * 4 )/( MPE *4n * Rz ) where MPE% = RF level, expressed as a percentage of the M PE limit applicable to continuous exposure of the general publ ic 100 = factor to convert the raw result to a percentage TxPower = maximum net power into antenna sector, in milliwatts, a function of the num ber of channels per sector, the transmitter power per channel, and line loss 8 . . • � 10 �cmaX-vd�s��no = numeric equivalent of the relative antenna gain in the downward direction of interest; pattern data is taken from the antenna manufacturer specifications 4 = factor to account for a 100-percent-efficient energy reflection from the ground, and the squared relationship between RF field strength and power density(22= 4) MPE = FCC general population M PE limit R = straight-line distance from the RF source to the point of interest, centimeters The MPE% calculations are performed out to a distance of 500 feet from the facility to points 6.5 feet (approximately two meters, the FCC-recommended standing height) off the ground, as i Ilustrated in the Figure 3, below. antenna height from antenna R bottom to 6.5'above ground level � 500 Ground Distance D from the site Figure 3. Street-level MPE%Calculation Geometry It is popularly understood that the farther away one is from an antenna, the lower the RF level — which is generally but not universally correct. The results of MPE% calculations fairly close to the site will reflect the variations in the vertical- plane antenna pattern as well as the variation in straight-line distance to the antennas. Therefore, RF levels may actually increase slightly with increasing 9 ♦ • • � distance within the range of zero to 500 feet from the site. As the distance approaches 500 feet and beyond, though, the antenna pattern factor becomes less significant, the RF levels become primarily distance-controlled, and as a result the RF levels generally decrease with increasing distance, and are well understood to be in compliance. FCC compliance for a collocated antenna site is assessed in the following manner. At each distance point along the ground, an MPE% calculation is made for each antenna operation (including each frequency band), and the sum of the individual MPE% contributions at each point is compared to 100 percent, the normalized reference for compliance with the MPE limit. We refer to the sum of the individual MPE% contributions as "total MPE%", and any calculated total MPE% result exceeding 100 percent is, by definition, higher than the FCC limit and represents non-compliance and a need to mitigate the potential exposure. If all results are consistently below 100 percent, on the other hand, that set of results serves as a clear and sufficient demonstration of compliance with the MPE limit. Note that according to the FCC, when directional antennas and sectorized coverage arrangements are used, the compliance assessments are based on the RF effect of a single (facing) sector, as the RF effects of directional antennas facing generally away are insignificant. Based on FCC guidelines, the following conservative methodology and assumptions are incorporated into the MPE% calculations on a general basis: 1. The antennas are assumed to be operating continuously at maximum power and maximum channel capacity. In addition, the effects of antenna line loss will be ignored wherever possible. 2. The power-attenuation effects of shadowing or other obstructions to the line-of-sight path from the antenna to the point of interest are ignored. 3. The calculations intentionally minimize the distance factor (R) by assuming a 6'6" human and performing the calculations from the bottom (rather than the centerline) of each party's lowest-mounted antenna, as 10 . . • � applicable. 4. The potential RF exposure at ground level is assumed to be 100-percent enhanced (increased) via a"perfect"field reflection from the ground itself. The net result of these assumptions is to significantly overstate the calculated RF exposure levels relative to the levels that will actually occur— and the purpose of this conservatism is to allow very"safe-side" conclusions about com pliance. The table on the next page provides the results of the MPE% calculations for each operator, with the worst-case overall result highlighted in bold in the last column. 11 . Ground T-Mobile T-Mobile MetroPCS Verizon Sprint AT&T Keyspan Town of Total Distance 1900 MHz 2100 MHz Southold ft MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% MPEo�p MPE% , : . . . ,.,.�� _,. _. . ..- . �,.., . ,_ _ . , , ..___ _ <._ ._ . ; _. ,�,-_ , _ �, ,,. 0 0.0026 0.0199 0.0179 0.1654 0.0019 0.0084 0.0024 0.0004 0.2189 20 0.0098 0.0351 0.0242 0.0715 0.0033 0.0219 0.0258 0.0011 0.1927 40 0.0024 0.0227 0.3138 0.0497 0.0410 0.0536 0.0673 0.0027 0.5532 • 60 0.0004 0.0392 0.0721 0.1929 0.0487 0.0826 0.0854 0.0032 0.5245 80 0.0060 0.1167 0.0895 0.0926 0.0058 0.0586 0.0882 0.0094 0.4668 100 0.0217 0.1798 0.0824 0.0200 0.0228 0.1344 0.0150 0.0020 0.4781 120 0.0137 0.1274 0.0577 0.2250 0.0113 0.1868 0.0409 0.0059 0.6687 140 0.0023 0.0528 0.0530 0.4248 0.0249 0.2034 0.0810 0.0055 0.8477 160 0.0079 0.0360 0.0498 0.5287 0.0084 0.2026 0.1054 0.0036 0.9424 180 0.0118 0.0739 0.0839 0.4308 0.0121 0.2169 0.1031 0.0019 0.9344 200 0.0125 0.1126 0.0679 0.2861 0.0266 0.2113 0.0868 0.0009 0.8047 I 220 0.0010 0.1109 0.0255 0.1595 0.0125 0.1911 0.0758 0.0031 0.5794 ' 240 0.0096 0.0872 0.0227 0.0715 0.0106 0.1685 0.0890 0.0096 0.4687 260 0.0069 0.0644 0.0578 0.0485 0.0129 0.1418 0.0845 0.0122 0.4290 280 0.0001 0.0287 0.0666 0.0441 0.0143 0.0980 0.0665 0.0103 0.3286 300 0.0023 0.0125 0.0620 0.1019 0.0094 0.0713 0.0343 0.0055 0.2992 320 0.0041 0.0027 0.0481 0.1537 0.0008 0.0422 0.0242 0.0036 0.2794 340 0.0023 0.0010 0.0326 0.1374 0.0011 0.0366 0.0267 0.0035 0.2412 360 0.0000 0.0080 0.0292 0.1923 0.0040 0.0391 0.0475 0.0062 0.3263 ' 380 0.0034 0.0250 0.0197 0.2628 0.0074 0.0482 0.0681 0.0085 0.4431 400 0.0122 0.0491 0.0178 0.3187 0.0102 0.0652 0.0859 0.0100 0.5691 420 0.0112 0.0448 0.0146 0.2905 0.0093 0.0596 0.0996 0.0103 0.5399 � 440 0.0182 0.0745 0.0134 0.3420 0.0121 0.0857 0.1058 0.0090 0.6607 460 0.0167 0.0685 0.0162 0.3140 0.0165 0.1186 0.0974 0.0083 0.6562 480 0.0150 0.1008 0.0149 0.3557 0.0152 0.1095 0.1008 0.0065 0.7184 500 0.0066 0.1376 0.0261 0.3286 0.0219 0.1601 0.0934 0.0061 0.7804 12 ' � � _ . � � As indicated, the worst-case calculated overall result is 0.9424 percent of the FCC MPE limit. A graph of the overall calculation results, provided below, provides perhaps a clearer visual illustration of the insignificance of the calculated RF levels. The line representing the calculation results barely rises above the graph's baseline, and shows an obviously clear and consistent margin to the FCC MPE limit. COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT RESULTS � Normalized FCC MPE Limit � Total MPE% Results 120 � a 100 I � ' ! a 80 0 n' 60 = j i � 40 � '� � \ 20 _ ', � o , � 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 Distance (ft) COMP�IANCE CONC�USION According to the FCC, the MPE limit has been constructed in such a manner that continuous human exposure to RF fields up to and including 100 percent of the MPE limit is acceptable and safe. In this case, the maximum calculated RF level from the combination of the proposed and existing antenna operations at the site is 0.9424 percent of the FCC MPE limit. In other words, even with the significant degree of conservatism in the analysis, the worst-case calculated RF level is still more than 106 times below the FCC MPE limit. 13 . . • � The results of the calculations indicate clear compliance with the FCC MPE limit. Moreover, because of the conservative calculation methodology and operational assumptions applied in this compliance analysis, the RF levels actually caused by the antennas will be even less significant than the calculation results indicate. CERTIFICATION The undersigned certifies as follows: 1. I have read and fully understand the FCC regulations concerning RF safety and the control of hum an exposure to RF fields (47 CFR 1.1301 et seq). 2. To the best of my knowledge, the statements and information disclosed in this report are true, complete and accurate. 3. The analysis of site RF compliance provided herein is consistent with the applicable FCC regulations, additional guidelines issued by the FCC, and industry practice. 4. The results of the analysis indicate that the subject antenna operations will be in clear compliance with the FCC limit concerning potential RF expos ure. �������� 3/24/14 Danie . ollins Date Chief hnicalOfficer 14 , � � � AppENdix A. Backc�RouNd oN TNE FCC MPE LiMir FCC Rules and Regulations As directed by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the FCC has established limits for maximum continuous human exposure to RF fields. The FCC maximum permissible exposure (MPE) limits represent the consensus of federal agencies and independent experts responsible for RF safety matters. Those agencies include the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In formulating its guidelines, the FCC also considered input from the public and technical community— notably the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). The FCC's RF exposure guidelines are incorporated in Section 1.301 et seq of its Rules and Regulations (47 CFR 1.1301-1.1310). Those guidelines specify MPE limits for both occupational and general population exposure. The specified continuous exposure MPE limits are based on known variation of human body susceptibility in different frequency ranges, and a Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) of 4 watts per kilogram, which is universally considered to accurately represent human capacity to dissipate incident RF energy (in the form of heat). The occupational MPE guidelines incorporate a safety factor of 10 or greater with respect to RF levels known to represent a health hazard, and an additional safety factor of five is applied to the MPE limits for general population exposure. Thus, the general population MPE limit has a built-in safety factor of more than 50. The limits were constructed to appropriately protect humans of both sexes and all ages and sizes and under all conditions — and continuous exposure at levels equal to or below the applicable MPE limits is considered to result in no adverse health effects or even health risk. The reason for two tiers of MPE limits is based on an understanding and assumption that members of the general public are unlikely to have had appropriate RF safety training and may not be aware of the exposures they receive; occupational exposure in controlled environments, on the other hand, is assumed to involve individuals who have had such training, are aware of the exposures, and know how to m aintain a safe personal work environment. The FCC's RF exposure limits are expressed in two equivalent forms, using alternative units of field strength (expressed in volts per meter, or V/m), and power density (expressed in milliwatts per square centimeter, or mW/cm2). The table on the next page lists the FCC limits for both occupational and general population exposures, using the mW/cm2 reference, for the different radio frequency ranges. 15 « . • Frequency Range(F) Occupational Exposure General Public Exposure (MHz) (mWlcm2) (mWlcm2) 0.3 - 1.34 100 100 1.34- 3.0 100 180/ F2 3.0 - 30 900/ F2 180/ F2 30 - 300 1.0 0.2 300- 1,500 F/ 300 F/ 1500 1,500 - 100,000 5.0 1.0 The diagram below provides a graphical illustration of both the FCC's occupational and general population M PE limits. Power Density (mW/cm2) 100 Occupational . , , ��� --------- General Public . . � 5.0 �� , . \ . , . 1.0 `, , �--------- , , , , , , , , , , . 0.2 ��--------', I� I I I I I I I 0.3 1.34 3.0 30 300 1,500 100,000 Frequency(MHz) Because the FCC's RF exposure limits are frequency-shaped, the exact MPE limits applicable to the instant situation depend on the frequency range used by the systems of interest. 16 a � • � The most appropriate method of determining RF compliance is to calculate the RF power density attributable to a particular system and compare that to the MPE limit applicable to the operating frequency in question. The result is usually expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit. For potential exposure from multiple systems, the respective percentages of the MPE limits are added, and the total percentage compared to 100 (percent of the limit). If the result is less than 100, the total exposure is in compliance; if it is more than 100, exposure mitigation measures are necessary to achieve compliance. Note that the FCC "categorically excludes" certain types of antenna facilities from the routine requirement to specifically (i.e., mathematically) demonstrate compliance with the MPE limit. Among those types of facilities are cellular antennas mounted on any type of tower, when the bottoms of the antennas are more than 10 meters (c. 32.8 feet) above ground. The basis for the categorical exclusion, according to the FCC, is the understanding that because of the low power and the directionality of the antennas, such facilities — individually and collectively — are well understood to have no significant effect on the human environment. As a result, the FCC automatically deems such facilities to be in compliance. FCC References on Compliance 47 CFR, FCC Rules and Regulations, Part 1 (Practice and Procedure), Section 1.1310 (Radiofrequency radiation exposure limits). FCC Second Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FCC 97-303), In the Matter of Procedures for Reviewing Requests for Relief From State and Local Regulations Pursuant to Section 332(c)(7)(8)(v) of the Communications Act of 1934 (WT Docket 97-192), Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation (ET Docket 93-62), and Petition for Rulemaking of the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association Concerning Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Preempt State and Local Regulation of Commercial Mobile Radio Service Transmitting Facilities, released August 25, 1997. FCC First Memorandum Opinion and Order, ET Docket 93-62, ln the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, released Decem ber 24, 1996. FCC Report and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, released August 1, 1996. FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields", Edition 97-01, August 1997. FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 56, "Questions and Answers About Biological Effects and Potential Hazards of RF Radiation", edition 4, August 1999. 17 { ♦ . � AppENdix B. SUMMARy OF EXPERT QUA�IfICATIONS Daniel J. Collins, Chief Technical Officer, Pinnacle Telecom Group, LLC Synopsis: • 40+ years of experience in all aspects of wireless system engineering, related regulation, and RF exposure • Has performed or led RF exposure compliance assessments on more than 17,000 antenna sites since the new FCC rules went into effect in 1997 • Has provided testimony as an RF compliance expert more than 1,400 times since 1997 • Have been accepted as an expert in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Pennsylvania and more than 40 other states, as well as b the FCC .... _ . . �.._.k.. , . .e��. ._ _ .. .�...-. Education: . B.E.E., City College of New York(Sch. Of Eng.), 1971 • M.B.A., 1982, Fairleigh Dickinson University, 1982 • Bronx Hi h School of Science, 1966 Current Responsibilities: • Leads ali PTG staff work involving RF safety and FCC compliance, microwave and satellite system engineering, and consultin on wireless technolo and re ulation Prior Experience: • Edwards & Kelcey, VP—RF Engineering and Chief Information Technology Officer, 1996-99 • Bellcore(a Bell Labs offshoot after AT&T's 1984 divestiture), Executive Director—Regulation and Public Policy, 1983-96 • AT&T (Corp. HQ), Division Manager— RF Engineering, and Director— Radio Spectrum Management, 1977-83 • AT&T Long Lines, Group Supervisor—Microwave Radio S stem Desi n, 1972-77 Specific RF Safety/ • Involved in RF exposure matters since 1972 Compliance Experience: . Have had lead corporate responsibility for RF safety and compliance at AT&T, Bellcore, Edwards & Kelcey, and PTG • While at AT&T, helped develop the mathematical models later adopted by the FCC for predicting RF exposure • Have been relied on for compliance by all major wireless carriers, the federal government as well as several state and local governments, system integrators, and other consultin and en ineerin firms Other Background: • Author, Microwave System Engineering(AT&T, 1974) • Co-author and executive editor, A Guide to New Technologies and Services(Bellcore, 1993) • National Spectrum Managers Association (NSMA)—former three-term President and Chairman of the Board of Directors; was founding member, twice-elected Vice President, long-time member of the Board, and was named an NSMA Fellow in 1991 • Published more than 35 articles in indust ma azines 18 i - venaor No. �hcck No. I Town of Southold, New York- Fay�tent'�oucher 33�3 Entered by Vendor Name Vendor Address CITYSCAPE CONSULTANTS,INC. 7050 W Palmetto Park Rd#15-652 Audit Date - , , Vendor Telephone Number Boca Raton,FL 33433 '�own Cltrk 561-558-28D8 en pr oI1•aGC Kay Miles�954)609-9797 direct Jnvoice Imroicx lnvoice � �e � Number Dste Totat Diacouat Arno9nt Claimod ldumtiar Des Na►of Goods or Servioes Qeaerai Fund end Rc�ount Numbu II n I 3108 10/28/2014 $4,000.00 N/A $4,000.00 #27131 . Consulting Services re: ireless p�ca n or . T-Mobile NE at Animal � Shelter. , i SCTM 1000-75-5-14.1 • � Payec CertiIIcation Departmeat Certification Thc undersigncd{6t�rere�}(Acting ott behadf of the above named clalmant) I henby certify that the materials+�bove specified have been nceived by me does hercby cettlfy thet the fcxcgaing claim is true and cumct,that no put has in good eondiHae without substitution,tho smias propuly becn paid,except es therela stated,th�the belance thereia staoed u actually PeaSutmed aid thrt the quen6tiee tfienof have been v«�ified with the exceptioru due and owing,and that taxes from which 4u T'owrt is ex¢enpt are exc)uded. or discrepencles na(ad,and payment is approvrd. Signatura Titte Business Manager gi� CITY rAPE � ' C:ompany Name^,.,�i� T• �///'��G i � . . . � � .. . � _ . _ \. � .. . . . �:'. �3 . ..,.r „ . . . ��. '�.�����'��� ���������� ' - ' � � Purci�s�Q�r � �7���. Tax fxempt � A16355� t - Date _ � !��I''� Accour�t � ���€��� .a�� �etiver snd�nd biliing to; . V�nds�r�;�,"� �,�" - : ' � ' � �� , . ' : � , Department���`��1 " ��-Y� �/' ��1��t��+��'- Address ������ �t.�'�-�+�.,- �� �-� ,��'�°'��#�����''l �'� ��- /�''��` ����-��'�, � ������ �� ���'�� . : � ������� ��- ����� � � V�F�t30R �� �`'Return this capy and Town of Southoid vouc#ier i�emiz�cc#ar�d signed for paym�t"" " ITEM QUANTtTI� DESCRIPTIQN t.tl�tiT GQST fiOTAL _ . � . . . . .. . . . � � a . . .. . . .. . . .. ��'��'��� - � � �`C�� � . ��� . �� � .: � � � , , � � ,� ��� � � � ���.� : � * . �� t # � ��„ _ � ;�� �� �: THiS PURC4iA6f O#i��fF IS I�OT VALIO WITHOU�THE��6M1IATURE3 OF THE DEP�.HEAD 1�lND TH� SUP'ERV1St)7Ft I CERTIFY ThEAT THERE`AR� ' SUFFICtENT�'UNt�S AVi41LA81.E `y IN T, A �Rt�PRFATl4l�+!CHA�GED , .m �`" . �. Dept. Head ' I GEflTIFY TH� TO BE A JUST � AIVD TRUE P RCNASE ORDE �� � "� '"�'���a ..��-'_-�...�.-,�.�� � �. � � � �' � - Supe�sor , - - PAR � �� ,��,�� T NT:�P . ��� ������.,1� , ., .__�. ,..�_�, . ; . , ,.�,�. W",..n�,., ,.. ..�.,�; � „� -.------�—�--�-�-,:-.�.�- ,��.� � . �p � �� � � � � � �� � SEP 19 201 � . � , � � �� �� � � TERNf,��AN����11DiT10��NS �� � � �� � � MSouthold Tovan THOLQ�s noi respcm�sibie fot mat�rial�,s��ptke�,or�e�a�pment t��#���red or ser�ic�s a�er�4rt��d���t�Qu��utk�c�r�ty o�written order:Qu�n#�t�e��i�c�f�ec� ar.e nt�t�c�be ex�e�ded. , . ,r, . �.. . _�2. �F�cha:nctes may.f�e`rriat�e in ttii�order�rithout�written �uthc�rit� of ti���supervisar. = 3. lnspe�etinrt�of d�li�ery�nritt�e r�ac��tt d,�l.ivery;poiLnt untess ath�nrise speci#�sd.Mater�al��rrrust be#�rop�rly�ia,�lc�c�ec�.;[��aag�`�a�����v�ili not be�accepted f����d�i�m�+�d;.p�ck�+���vr�h ,all:��r�prne�t�����V��y i�daqi's�requireti urrtess �herw� spec�#�i�.A11 p�t��quc��et�r��st tn- °< �lucf��k�pp�:=ha�id�ing,Ra�ti���d.�rating cfiarg���end�f�.B,`�ivsr�d; ��less at���erir�s � ;�r���'�!`'t«. � � � '� , , y �� : , , . _ � . . ' . . - = A 4. Sub�itutinr�s:�f s�e�fi�d i#�ms v�r�����ti4t be acc�.p�able. l'he T+�w�t'�'f�r�ut#�old reservas tF�� _ right�o r�j�c�a�tl ��t�arn,��.s�ippers expense, mat�riat�d+�ti�t�re��I�ir�ctc�r�ot con#fltm�o de= 5 ,� scripYron of�i�err'[�,a or��'e�. : ” _� � ' ' �� � 5. if arder.c,�nno�b�fif�ed in'whofe or in part in tirrte specifiied, nQtify fihe tavvn i.mmerliately, lr� case crf dela}f in de�iver�;ar in c�se of any tlefi�ft c��the vencior,t��town may proc�re tMe goads - or servic�s �f�om other sources and Fiold the venc�or�responsib�e for any EXCESS C��?, EX- PEN��t1`R L)�►NIAG��'acca'sioned thereby. 6. U�an ac�;ep#a�ce of this =�rder the ven�ior agre�es to compfy with atl �ede.ral, Stat�or-local ` � law�ret�ti��;�hereto: �� �� ' ' �� -, �� �.., � _ :.,. ::. � � a:fihe ve.ndor.s�ia11 defen� actions or c9air��s brr��ght and �ald�he Ta�vn o#S�t�thold, its �gents and its+�rnplpyees harrnless�from iass,suits;°costs;r�ghts,p�en#-or p�tent �igt�#s of�any invention ar ai�y other cause. b.The ve��dar re�res�nts and warrants that the un�t prices.charged'herein are n�t hi�her than a�y applic,abl� le�atr�n��i.mum pr��es pe�rr�itt�d; ��d �;re not in��xcess v#tho�e�t�rr�ntly ' charged t��oth�r governmental, institutic�na�or c�smmerc�al users for simiiar iterns,qtt�nti#�es a�d det�u�3ries. c. l,nsofar as appl�c�b(e, the Venctor shall cQr►m�ply wi�Eh �ections 22�1. 220-a, Z�t}-b, 22�1-c, �2A-d, 220-e and 2�2+��,tti��.��r.l:aw of th:e St�te:��New Yc�rk f�latin�tc� maxi�um a+vc�rk- ; ir�g haur�and►�in'rr���t wage�df employees,and�rahib�ir�g tlis+�a��rr�ina#�n+�r��ciaunt c��race, s�x,color,�r��d,pr�t��iariai or�gin ir��iring emp��yees witl�in t�e State i�f New�lc��'k involved ir� the mant��a�tu��of materials,equipment, or$upplies specified in this arder. ` d. The vE�neio�`s��!!comply with Sections 10�a and 1Q3b of th� Genera{ Mt�nicipat Law pertainirt�g tt� t�'i�qualrtfic�tians ofi contractor for failure to waive immunity b�ft►re Grar�d Jury. 7. IIVVO�CE:S R�NDERED ON ENCLOSED CLAIM'FORNi MU�T BE iTEN1�Z�[y l(�G DETAIL. Cla�ms for partial deliv�ries are not allowed unless indicatec�. Claims in questi��will�cc��stit�rte a +con�lition pi�����l�n't'to �he righf�t af�t�e v�ndor or i��ceive ���i pay�er��ai�Cl�a�t�i�s"�'F�(Fspute mu�t be adjusted before final acceptance by the Tawn af Southold. 8. Billing:shalf allow far exemption from taxes under Federal Excise 7ax Exemption �ertificate '��`�� tVo. A-1635�3� �e1d by tf�e l"�iwn r�f Sauth'ofd. : a,g..- ;. ��>;� 9. Gash dis+:aunt terms must be indicated on claim voucher;�tisco.un#period wiU be c�mputed frorr► date of accept�nc�of delivery or receipt of a correct clai�n votrcher,.w�h[che�er`t�.��ter. 10. The provisians of the Ne�nr York State Fair Trade Law (Feld-Crawkir+d"�4`ct� arr��thc��F�€ieral ` Price Discriminatian Law tRnbinson-Patman Ac#) do nat apply to purchas+�s raTade t�y�#�e T�avn of Southold�. _ 11. Atl P".O./��laims must be audited and approved;by the Town Board p�ior#o ac#ual payment. , „ , � _� - � � � �. �,_ � .,�.: �.. ����_�. :�a9 �.. .,_ _.. ., __ _ __ - , � � � � �' � � . '� '�'�� ��.� INVO�CE � CdNSUITANTS, INc. DATE INVOICE# 7050 W. Palmetto Park Rd #15-652 10/29/2014 3�os Boca Raton, FL 33433 Tel: (877)438-2851 Fax: (877) 220-4593 BILL TO ;�o�c� � o__�_ � n� �own of Southold ;�� �!ov � 2o�Y� � Heather Lanza, AICP, Planning Dir ___,,�, P.O. Box 1179 Southold�own � Southold, NY 11971 Planning Board�� I � Project Ref/PO: TMO LI13281A 41405 Hwy 25 �.`_' Description Rate Amount Site Application Review and Analysis: TMO#LI-13-281-A 4,000.00 4,000.00 Site Application submitted by T-Mobi�e Wireless;to modify/upgrade equipment on existing structure located at 41405 Hwy 25, Peconic , Review completed 10-8-2014 � ' �j�� p ��-�,,��/ � "°�''I SCTM: 1000-75.-5-14.1 PURCHASE ORDER#27131 � ; � � � �! I � t 4 � � � 1 � I I i � � Total s4,000.00 www.CityScapeGov.com + � � MAILING ADDRESS: , PLANNING BOAR,D MEMBERS ��OF SO(/�'yO P.O. Box 1179 DONALD J.WILCENSKI ,`0 �� Southold, NY 11971 Chair � � OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS Town Hall Annex PIERCE RAFFERTY � � �O� 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III ���. � (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR C�U�,� Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.s outhol dt ownny.gov PLANNING BOAR.D OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 19, 2014 Mr. Richard L. Edwards d/b/a CityScape Consultants, Inc. 7050 Palmetto Park Road Boca Raton, FL 33433 Re: Consulting Services for T-Mobile NE at Animal Shelter Located at 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic, NY 11958 SCTM#1000-75-5-14.1 Zoning District: R-80 Dear Mr. Edwards: The Planning Board has authorized your scope of services in connection with the above. This letter will authorize you to proceed with the consulting work as outlined in the Agreement. Enclosed is the approved Purchase Order#27131, $4,000.00, with amount not to be exceeded. Any work beyond this amount must be authorized in writing prior to being started. Also enclosed for your convenience is a Southold Town Voucher Form for your use with each invoice submitted to this department. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at 631R65-1938 between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Sincerely, �.�r`�Ou�l�tM� Brian Cummings Planner Encls. • i �1►fFQ4rc � � TOWN OF SOUTH�LD ��.� ��� Purchase 0rder #` \ 2 713 a. Tax fExempt #-A 16�554 � 1� //� Date _ Account.#� �' Deliver and�ser�d biliing to: ; `�+�endor����,,,� � � � , ��/ ��s f?�, Departrnent�6�,n�! ��1'C.l ; �/ ., _ C..C7'/'��13 Address ��1.�� �t�t�U�i /� � �e'"��Q 7(t 1'`� �� ��C.. 11'?'� �1.�--���� � (w 5`dc�ara; /�Y / l q'�l ���. ,�"L. ����� . _ , V�NDQ�i �..._ _ "`Return xhis copy and T�wn ofi�Souttaold vouc�ier=itemized artd ��nedqfar,�,yment*` , ITEfVI 'QUA"NTITY `D.ES�RIP�`�ON , ; l�N T COST� � TOTAL ����v�� �`�; �C./ r , � �(� //� � /Y� � . . � } � f � �� � � - .. ! �. . ` ' . � � /��y� ,.r.� 1���-4 - �. V' . ., �{,r� V� -L,�J .... .. � .. � �./ �� . .. . r . . �- .: ; .,� ;..._. ,. .. ..»��. � _ r �, � . . �� ;�� '�' � � � ��� �� �. - � � � �� . � = �'� � _ `�► ��� �� � � � �. �� �� � ���� �� � � � � � � � � � r � x _ ,. � . . � . • , t . � � THIS PURCHASE ORDER tS NOT VALtD WITNOUT TFf� SIGNATURES OF THE fDEPT. HEAD AND�'f'HE SUPERV�SOR ;„, 4 i�CERTtFY TH�T THEFiE AR� � � " � ��� � � ��� SUFFICtENT�FIIND�AVAILABLE` � ��� �� � �� � � � , tN T RROPRIATION CHARGED ����i"`�� �_.�..� � �� � � � . � �� � � > , _ _ _ � Dept. Head I CERTIFY THIS TO BE A JUST AND T.RIJE PURCMASE ORD�R l ' • � MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �oF so�ry P.O. Box 1179 DONALD J.WILCENSKI ��� ��O Southold, NY 11971 Chair � � OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS Town Hall Annex PIERCE R.AFFERTY � � � 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III �� � (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) IvIARTIN H.SIDOR y(,'�U���� Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 www.southoldtownny.gov PLANNING BOAR,D OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Accounting From: Planning Departme }�M Date: September 15, 2014 Re: Checks The attached check is for a Consultant Escrow Fee for the Sprint Wireless review listed below. Please deposit into B691 Deferred Revenue Account. Thank you. Applicant/Project Name & Tax Map Amount Check Date/No. T e # Wireless: T-Mobile NE at Animal 1000-75-5- Shelter Upgrades 14.1 $4,000.00 8/13/14-#2918380 escrow fee Wireless: T-Mobile NE at Junge 1000-96-1- $4000.00 8/13/14-#2913381 U rades 19.1 escrow fee Im atts. ti ' � ' U i J N ■ ■ . . . t II ii Z '� � Northe� st LLC 0 � �- WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA `o A R C H I T E C T S L L P � 3500 SUNRISE HIGHWAY GREAT RIVER, NY 1 1739 ,��.,.�.��� �.,,�,.,�„� t � VOICE � 631-6ffi-84SU FPJC � 631-68?84.99 _ h t t p : / / w w w . w t c a i a . c o m � �� LTE MODERNIZATION SITE I�JO. LI- 13-Z81 A WFC PROJECT NO. 14-10552 � ' � 41405 H I�%Y ZS l'ECON/C NY 11958 `����;4 ����� � � o � � 2 03/19/4 LSSUEDFORREVIEIV JG NM , 3 04/23/I4 ISSUED FOIt FlLING JG NM � v 0 b" SECTION: BLOCK: 5 LOT: 14.001 LATITUDE: N41°02'2227"E i y � /1':, s'��< � '"°w,e �'�.., / % �. �= � ��i � � � " �`� � � � ��.� ` � r ,r�" ZONING: R-80,RESIDENTIAL DENSITY LONGITUDE: N7Z°27'Z3.45"W r G�raxa � � r $ }i �.,,�, «... �,,.t'��5. ,l,%' � � an[�: NAD. 83 I � ,,� Y �� �'�^� � COOROIN�TES MID ELEVATIONS RE(ERENCE��BDVE WERE SUPPLED BY i NO&LE NORTHEAST, NC y .. �i, ��'�` ,''` �. �� �'� $���. �� „� f � ~' C!� ,� a� � ��� ����p � . � � i«E�EECT u�rcES rv0 wMRnNTIES OR GU�RUJiEES REuiNE t0 tME�R/�CCUW�Cv OR COUPLh�CE wih iM?C AMSL: 20'-0" '� ' � `'p ,�. # ��,• .. �- ��"'�'8€.� . . NOTES . � �.�,�.4 x .. .. . �. � n. :�.SG " ss t n: ','> ;s, ,� , ..�.�,F-�., „ . ;,: �... ._., . ,. .. ' ':: � .. �;::3 � ,?,, , � -.., �, * 4' ":i,l`' ' � -�-' ., , .��• ..'C�,. � �: Y. `�;, �.F ..,,. ,�..�..+� . �::<. ' �w.-.�.:' .::,.. : ,. : � :",;; ;-?� _„,.-, . , � . *"^�4 '" . ' �.�.: ��;.; -,:- ,, ,,,; .��� ::: .�„.. � '���..,.,, �` , (1)NO CONSTRUCTION OR BIDDING IS TO PROCEE�UNLESS � �'�'� ', ��� ,�`�'.�.# � f ,, ' ' " % : 4`"-� ''^.` �� . � ,'���% �. � � � � -�-� ��� PUNS INCLUDE THE STAiEMENT"ISSUED FOR CONSiRUCTION" ' , �� 5._, .:,..� -';:.;: , t� ��., , f�.,. . , , ��. ;z� , �..._ . . ,. o .�• � �� . � '��`. ��:_ yy�' ;^ ���. �ef� ����. 7 � ";y�,. �. � �; � ��� . .� . �� LOCATION OF EQUIPMENT: ���RAWLAND IN THE DESCRIPTION COLUA/N ABOVE.PRIOR TO BIDDING OR r,� . CONSTRUCifON,CONTRACTOR MUST ALSO CONTACi W(C TO �. � � . �� CONFIRM THEY ARE IN POSSESSION OF iHE LATEST PUNS. °i , ; � � ; . � ' � . ���.. �' � - ���� � . � ' ' . �.p`' :�` < � a , �' � �"' � ��� EQUIPMENTSQUAREFOOTAGE: 375 SQ.FT.f - e�:'' �s; ;.ta�'t ''�f- s�� _ ,�' °".,�,4 ro^��� � . -.�.� ,,,,-�.,� � �,, � . . .. . . � H ;, .� -,. .. , � ...�x � ,�. ,< ' �, c�, , , • � � ���r�. R � ,�� ,,.( 3a. „' �..; �. � �' I q��., s ., ,� f:.. - f:>: :.. _ -�" =�:.., �a`,.�.�. ` -._`�, ,� .� . � �a �� . .,."'�r . �'. �� � ; . . -� , ,,..;..,, g2� . � . A�%. ' .. ?', .',6.r �' .. .�� .� ;' „ .>. I :: ,�.:„ . . , . . �.'. e . _ � �. �.s,..,,.:M_ ft�; . , -.� ..�.. «.,. . ..,a. �. �. ., , . ,:'¢�� . � . . ,,, .:.r.. . .. ......i ...::. ., ,,..n.W „ ";"' :,, . ' _a:. , ; � ` ' ` ,.��+u ; � `"" "� �w�r--"-'� ''.�" r�" '�^'� EQUIPMENT:(1) EXISTING 512000 CABINET, (1) EXISTING UMTS CABINET & (1) EXISTING GPS UNIT �3 �� � • _ � .� ,� � - ,�;:. ---_ . �� �, ������ -�; � y ���� �.;,� , ��` ANTENNA:(6) EXISTING ANTENNAS TO BE REMOVED & REPLACED WITH (6) NEW AIR21 ANTENNAS �i^�_� �y�,nr � ' �' ,�' ��.�,w ' � ��a n �;'.: � ,, ' � (3) EXISTING COAX CABLES TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH (3) HYBRID ���' ""� � �, .�a t�'��:.i .:z-j'� ?a �,'� -;,r"3 .� . . . '*.'� . �"��" . . . � \'y:`/,�rt� !� ��\ , ,�., K� S(T ,.,, ,�g 3 �� ,�: ��, �,� �. ;,. .z�., �. � .� � , � ,,. , �; � � , � � .� � �. �F - .: ,. � . , � : J � � c , ` � : �, i ' „ ; r ::ta�saau;; , .,.k ", ^>. ��`a, 4., ,: � �{)�� �„ , ,�:f, x �, �,�' �-�k��.;,'"r.w �,<.r� � .. ���.,�• 'C:.� �� , � �. ,�`• ., ,, -:: � . .p,sri�a,. , . . �.*, .. . . ,:-. �/((/ � r;-rs"' � � \ �� I�li i � jv „ -<, „.-. ;. ... ; . : , ,�... wViii�yFF��' �.:� ,� ..,,� � ` � ` �:.: �✓ I Cr�ie ,��.�.z..�su {t� '9 � . � ,.� . , / `� i�, � ; r, i �'��++ ,� -^� ����y a1 �,14i� �� \ ;" s PROPERTYCOMACT. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �n� S �' .J; Y ly4 y e� � - Y�+, I ,r 9•� f+r 9➢ ��= " � �',;*'� '� � � }e �,i � � ' � � l'�f;1 � UTILffY CONTACT: �` � '���� � � � , + (516) 545-7676 UPA . ` 4�,�� n ,.k t ' +y�;� { � �sr ,, '_� 7 - �. � P r +k anan . �y �� .xY.Ci1 ^i y � i � s '•.: �` :'�'�' � �'-�� �,� �A �,, g4t€ APPLICAM: T-MOBILE NORTHEAST INC xat}' r �'' ' �,5. _,� �':� ;���..�""' ' .. .. � ■ �.!'� f- .:� � r I � r t r , SH�h1rtY . . .. .. ' . : . ',�''+3� -. yramne,.raf :_�:: °rs�e�Qass.�. . . . , .:� .. . � :;. ��. 'rs a� �. J, �r�i " ^��' �- . : ...•;.�,.. .*' .'�.., ...!. ... .::�...� : ;. J I r �,. �, �,. Cm+FYs�:i r.: � . . ,''.,�' F. . . . . . f < ' .. � . ... : . .. . .. ::. � f ..; f' �`�'" � ;' � � & , ''p T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC 3500 SUNRISE HWY,GREAT RIVER,NY 1 1739 ,t� -c�� ���`,' ,z� „�� � '� ""� �„�� �ta CONSfRUCTION MANAGER: PAUL LAPASOTA�631�2246651 `` ��-- /�' /` I �-�'i '�:� � W ��,��:°� � "�- _�'� <°� RF ENGINEER: ENRIQUE RAMOS ~ � � � � a RF MANAGER: NAMIT SHARMA J ����'~ � �aj . / . � Fi . . �: a :. , , ,�:..�;�. �. . 0 L I Z ., . . . , ,<,<., .,, <,:. .... .>..,, _� ,y. �,:,-,. ��;.. , . . 'c,�-'r,-. . .,-z -�c.�- , oasa ...N -� �t �_ t�� ��' �:- - k � -,�a.=�t .,.,-��'o.,.�., s _�._ r����"< ,�� .5.�,. � � ,z. c._ ` '..'� -- ,s�„:,a... " ii,> „�.. -;6> � <n:c . .::,:.. ' .:. '. . ,:.: .. . ..� . ,. , ,�.r.,�.:.. , «. :._,. ,;,..,.. , ��::..:,•. ,., � ...� „ „ ,:x. '.. , ,. m ..,., , . .... Hfw::: '. ' � _,<.; . , . -�.: rs� � /�!i 1 � � APPROVED T 1 TRLESHEET 03/07/14 3 04/23/14 ■ � �I V i i ■ ■ � DIRECTIONS: „ :� t,� ,,, � � ..�,�,� � � 1�it� 1 , .. i � � APPROVED AS NOTED r- � =,.. - '' �` .5:<:, � ��,. ��_��:u �a` „._.' ���`�`;', • � �■ Na tt-�east LLC `o HEAD WEST ON WIDGEON CT TOWARD WOODHOLLOW RD. PAUL LAPASOTA DATE CJ DISAPPROVED/REVISE A-1 SITE PLAN 6 ENERAL N TES 03/07/14 3 04 23 14 350D SUNRISE HWY. -� TURN RIGHT ONTO WOODHOLLOW RD. A-2 ENLARGED EQUIPMENT PLAN&NORTHEAST ELEVATION 03 07/14 3 04/Z3/14 3 TURN RIGHT ONTO CHURCH RD. � ' '' �r ; �� � ;` � � K �' A-3 AMENNADETAILS 03/07/14 3 04 23/14 SUITE D-203 � TURN LE�T ONTO GREAT RIVER RD. �� � � � � � � � x � PPROVED V� � � A-4 AMENNA SCHEDULE&ROUTING SCHEMATIC 03/07/t4 3 04 23 14 GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 i GREAT RIVER RD BECOMES CONNETQUOT AVE. � SITE INFORMATION - TAKE THE RAMP TOWARD RT-27 E. � APPROVEDASNOTED o TURN SLIGHT RIGHT ONTO SUNRISE HwY. NAMIT SHARMA DATE " MERGE ONTO CR-51 N VIA EXIT 61 TOWARD RIVERHEAD. � DISAPPROVED/REVISE PECOMC j o TURN RIGHT ONTO CR-63N / LAKE AVE / E MORICHES RIVERHEAD RD. s,,�, � ' i,.;�_ � -. �" 9,<< % n = ,`�"• „ `=s �}�4OS HWY ZS ENTER NEXT ROUNDABOUT AND TAKE 2ND EXIT ONTO NY-24 E / FLANDERS RD. � APPROVED PECONIC,N.Y. 11958 ' � TURN LEFT ONTO CR-105N / CROSS RIVER DR. ' � TURN RIGHT ONTO NORTHVILLE TURNPIKE / CR-43. � APPROVEDASNOTED L�13-781A I TURN RIGHT ONTO SouND AVE. ENRIQUE RAMOS DATE � DISAPPROVED/REVISE DESIGN TYPE � STAY STRAIGHT TO GO ONTO CR-48E / MIDDLE RD. „� �.�� s �- a s, y ,� � � TURN RicHT oNTo PEcoNic �aNE. �,,..:, r_. �.�,� _ ;.� ����,>F_. J.°��.� �£� LTE MODERNIZATION ! � TURN RIGHT ONTO NY-25 / MAIN ROAD. �J APPROVED � � SITE LOCATION IS ON YOUR R�GHT AT 41405 HWY 25. 1 ' " �, APPROVED AS NOTED �r�tA �� ���*�i�.',�t�;�.. ..... .:: .�� `;��� �<a.<::�� �i`?�:� .. F..��i. II �' DAN GUSTAFERRI DATE � DISAPPROVED/REVISE TITLE d 1�1c. � �, �r � � " .,�� � � SHEET � �� APPROVED S�� �� �V d 3 �-1 APPROVED AS NOTED f,l,�.��4'�� : 3 :���_�,': _. . � : s`° � No7E: CHRIS SCHAAF DATE DISAPPROVED/REVISE _ __ .., � . _ ,. .. ,. � r � COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IS NOT PERMITTED ON PARKWAYS.VERIFY ALL ROUTES. � T 1 � L H � GENERAL NOTES� 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL, LAWS, ORDINANCES, AND REGULATIONS WHEREVER APPLICABLE. � 2 EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL BE HELD TO HAVE VISITEG THE SITE AND TO HAVE VERIFIED ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF BID. � 3. IN AL� CASES, DRAWINGS SHALL NOT BE SCA�ED FOR INFORMATION. FIGURED DIMENSIONS AND t CONDITIONS MUST BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD. z 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND BE RESPONSBLE FOR ALL FIELD DIMENSIONS AND JOB CONDITIONS, AND - SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS, AND/OR OMISSIONS WHICH WOULD � � INTERFERE WITH THE SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF THE WORK. SHOULD HE FAIL TO FOLLOW THIS ' � PROCEDURF AND CONTINUE WITH 7HE wORK, HE SHALL ASSUME ALL RESPONSIBILITY AND UABILITY W I L L I A M F. C O L L I N S, A I A `o ARISING THEREFROM. A R C H I T E C T S, L L P 0 5. ALL �TEMS OF WORK IDENTIFIED ON THE DRAWINGS BY NAME, NOTE, OR MATERIAL DESIGNATION ARE NEW, 3 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ' d g. ALL NEW MATERIALS AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURERS LATEST ����� �'�u�'�� t EXISTING T-MOBILE voic� ` ��"sas° F^X ` u��sasv c EQUIPMENT PAD. ,Q PRINTED SPECIFICATIONS, AND WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODE REQUIREMENTS. h t t p: / / w w w . s ( c a i a . c o m o SEE 1�A-2 FOR � � � 7. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH BEST STANDARD TRADE PRACTICES. EACH TRADE � � ADDITIONAL ��,'�� � � \ � SHALL COOPERATE WITH OTHER TRADES TO FACILITATE JOB SCHEDULING AND COMPLETION. �C PROJEC'f NO. 14-10552 c INFORMATION � . \ g. PROPRIETARY NAMES IDENTIFYING ITEMS OF WORK ARE USED TO DESIGNATE THE STANDARD OF �� 0 0 �` c�o. n�78 �� °` � � CONSTRUCTION. ITEMS OF EQUAL QUAUTY MAY BE SUBMITTED FOR THE ARCHITECTS REVIEW AND � � I 03 07 I4 Lf$UED fOR PRELIMINARf REIAEW JG NM °' EXISTING LATTICE � APPROVAL. z 03/19/t4 ISSUEDFORREVIEW �� Nnn � TOWER � 9. EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO ADJOINING REMAINING AREAS AS A 3 oa/z3/ia lSSUEDFORFlLJNG JG rvnn / � � RESULT OF HIS WORK, AND SHALL REPAIR DAMAGED SURFACES TO THEIR PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS OR c A-� � �Ii AS MAY BE REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE ENTIRE SCOPE OF THE WORK. �;, EXISTING BUILDINGS 10. ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING WORK SHALL BE PATCHED AND FINISHED, AS NECESSARY, TO MATCH EXISTING � � � \ � CONTIGUOUS SURFACES OR NEW FINISHES SHOWN. 0 '� � /:�^ � � 1 1. AT THE COMPLE710N OF EACH WORKDAY, EACH TRADE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING UP THEIR I �O G� I WORK. RUBBISN REMOVAL SHALL BE DONE IN A DUST INHIBITIVE FASHION, AND THE JOB SITE SHALL BE ° /� SFC EXISTING PROPANE FREE OF ALL DEBRIS AND BROOM CLEAN UPON COMPLETION. ', �6 � '� T ,_ ���OR �0 \ //�2�' �R g• O TANK (TYP.) �2. CLEAN AL� FLOORS, WALLS, DOORS, MISC., GLASS, ETC. LEAVING JOB FREE OF DUST AND DEBRIS, PRIOR � � \ / TO PROJECT COMPLETION. (1)NO CONSTRUCTION OR BIDDING IS i0 PROCEED UNLE55 ' r 13. EXISTING EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS TO BE REMOVED, WHICH ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE RELOCATED OR FLpNS INCLUDE iHE SiATEMEN7"ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION" 3 � � / IN THE DESCRIPTION COLUMN�BOVE.PRIOR TO BIDDING OR � / � RETAWED BY THE OWNER, SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND BE REMOVED FROM CONSTRUCTION,CONiRACTOR MUSi AL50 CONTACT WFC TO _ �� � �\ THE PREMISES. CONFIRM THEY ARE IN POSSESSION OF THE L4TEST PIANS �, - (2) EXISTING T-MOBILE � 14. INDICATIONS OF WORK TO BE REMOVED ARE GENERAL ONLY, AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO SHOW ALL ITEMS ANTENNAS TO BE � WHICH MAY REQUIRE REMOVAL. SUCH ITEMS SHALL BE REMOVED, RELOCA7ED, AND/OR REINSTALLED, AS REMOVED & REPLACED WITH (2) NEW AIR21 REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION OF NEW WORK. _` ANTENNAS. (TYP. AT ALL � 15. THESE DOCUMENTS DO NOT AUTHORIZE DETERMINING THE PRESENCE, NOR THE REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS `�=��,��-� "4 , SECTORS) SEE ANTENNA � O OR OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. IF DURING THE COURSE OF THE PROJECT, ASBESTOS OR OTHER fj �C�� �,,_�'�� ��� DETAILS SHEET A-3 NAZARDOUS MATERIA� CONTAMINATION IS SUSPECTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CARRIER'S �fti � tyf�=R � � ,'rY��� PROJECT MANAGER WITHIN 24 HOURS. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUSPEND WORK IN THE AFFECTED .4REA UNTIL ('1 ['t i�r� 5'��\ �_ i PROPERTY LINE /�� SUCH A TIME THAT SAID AREA IS CERTIFIED CONTAMINATION-FREE. IN THE INTERIM, THE CONTRACTOR �I j�J � � Y�'>''� ��.` '\` / '� � �� SHALL ENDEAVOR TO RESCHEDULE WORK TO AREAS UNAFFECTED BY SUSPECTED CONTAMINATION IN �''x 1I-`_' ��- � j -�'' \ i� O �� \ ORDER TO MINIMIZE DELAY TO THE PROJECT SCHEDULE. q�`- � EXISTING � 16. ALL MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK SHA�L BE IN FULL CONFORMANCE WITH N.Y.S. UNIFORM FIRE �� i .`�,� '` � OVERHEAD WIRES �- � / � PREVENTION AND BUILDING CODE, AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS. �� ' ' --�• , f � /.� � � EXISTING STORAGE 17. ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE INSTALLED BY AN ELECTRICIAN LICENSED IN SUFFOLK COUNTY IN � ' :''f ' C ON TAIN E R ACCORDANCE WITH NEW YORK STATE AND NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODES. A NEW YORK BOARD OF FIRE v � �l % EXISTING OPEN DIRT AREA �\ O D, \ BUILDING UNDERWRITER'S CERTIFICATE SHALL BE OBTAINED FOR ALL ELECTRICAL WORK, AND SUPPLIED TO THE � �'C �� /• ENTRANCE OWNER AND ARCHITECT. ��}� ��.I��`��V i �_. \�1 r� . .. 1 8. �:..--' I T K A I A J \; � \ PROVIDE ANY AND ALL TREATED WOOD BLOCKING/BACKING OR 1 4 GA GALV FLAT S OC B CK NG S � J EXISTING DOG KENNEL � /� \ �j� REQUIRED TO ENSURE PROPER AND ADEQUATE SUPPORT (IN COMPLIANCE WITH NEW YORK STATE o \ ✓ \ / � �' BUILDING CODE MINIMUM LOADING REQUIREMENTS WHERE APPLICABLE) OF VARIOUS ITEMS WCLUDING, BUT � �� NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED T0, HANDRAILS, CABINETRY, SHELVING, HANDICAP GRAB BARS, TOILET I Z � �� ACCESSORIES, CABLE TRAYS, CONDUITS, ETC. „ EXISTING ASPHALT � OPQ 19. ADA COMPLIANCE: THE FACIUTY IS A NORMA�LY UNOCCUPIED MOBILE RADIO FACILITY. T ■ ��obil{.�� � � GENERAL SITE NOTES� � � Nc�rtheast LLC ' o EXISTING POLICE STATION � P�� 1. ALL SITE WORK TO CONFORM TO THE LATEST TOWN OF EAST HAMPTON PLANNING BOARD SPEGFICATIONS � 3500 SUNRISE HWY. AND STANDARDS. SUITE D-203 � 2. TA TION OF ALL FOOTING AND FOUNDATION TO 3 'DEWATER' ALL TRENCHES AS REQUIRED DURING INS LLA GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 -o ENSURE PROPER DEPTH AND S7RUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF CONCRETE. s 3. THE DEVELOPER SHALL COMPLY WITH APPROVED WORKING DRAWINGS AND REQUIREMENT SHEETS. NO STTE INFORMATION DEVIATION WILL BE PERMITTED EXCEPT BY WRITTEN APPROVAL OF TOWN HEMPSTEAD PLANNING BOARD. � 4. COMPACTION UNDER STRUCTURES, BUILDING SLABS, STEPS, PAVEMENTS AND WALK WAYS SHALL BE 95% PECOMC � MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY, ASTM D 1557. COMPACTION UNDER LAWNS OR IN UNPAVED AREAS, 85% MAXIMUM 41405 HWY 25 ' � DRY DENSITY, ASTM o i ss�. PECONIC,N.Y. 11958 � 5. ALL ELECTRIC AND 7ELEPHONE SERVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND. 0 6. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO TONE PATH OF EXISTING CABLE AND PROVIDE MARK-OUTS. HAND EXCAVATE ���28I A NEAR ANY UNDERGROUND PIPES, UTIUTIES, OR STRUCTURES. DESIGN TYP'E I 7. VERIFY �OCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITHIN AREAS OF WORK. PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY � MEANS OF PROTECTION OF SAID EXISTING UTILITIES AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE NEW woRK. LTE MODERNIZATION COORDINATE ALL REQUIRED RELOCATION WORK WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY PROVIDER. � 8. ALL WASTE MATERIAL INCLUDING RUBBISH, STUMPS, DEBRIS, ETC., SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE SHEET T1T1-E .� CONTRACTOR AND BE REMOVED FROM THE siTE. SITE PLAN, EQUIPMENT DETAILS, „ ;N 9. CONTRACTOR TO MINIMIZE THE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROL k� MEASURES, IF REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL &GENERAL NOTES 'I N t �'I J GUIDEUNES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ALL CONCRETE USED FOR ON-SITE CONSTRUCT�ON SHEE,i, NUMBER REV ° �,� ARCHTECTURAL SITE PLAN ��i� SHALL BE AIR ENTRAWED, MINIMUM 4,000 PSI AT 28 DAYS. = 10. IF EXISTING GRAVEL BEDDING IS REMOVED, STOCKPILE, AND RESPREAD AS REQUIREC TO ACCOMMODATE � SCALE: 1"=200'-0" NORTH /�_ 1 3 � $ NEW WORK. RESTORE LANDSCAPE FI�TER FABRIC AS WELL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL MATERIALS AS REQUIRED. � ` � 11. FINA� GRADE SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM THE PCS EQUIPMENT AND TOWER AREAS. L H ` NOTE: I DRAWINGS DEPICT THE WSTALLATION OF ANTENNAS, CABLWG, ETC. � THAT ARE TO BE PLACED ON AN EXISTING LATTICE TOWER STRUCTURE A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS SHAL� BE PERFORMED BY EXISTING AT&T ANTENNAS � OTHERS, PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW ANTENNA J COMPONENTS, AS REQUIRED TO EVALUATE THE EXISTING LATTICE �I TOWER STRUCTURE FOR ADEQUACY OF SUPPORT FOR THE NEWLY o EXISTING SPRINT ANTENNAS v APPLIED LOADS OF THE NEW EQUIPMENT. ANALYSIS SHALL BE PERFORME� BY A NEW YORK STATE LICENSED PROFESSIONAL �'� � ENGWEER. THE EVALUATION REPORT AND REMEDIAL DESIGN IF z _ REOUIRED SHALL BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY OTHERS. OWNER SHA�L (6) EXISTING T-MOBILE , o BE RESPONSBLE FOR VERIFYING STRUCTURAL ADEQUACY OF THE ANTENNAS TO BE REMOVED & � EXiSTING LATTICE TOWER. REPLACED WITH (6) NEW AIR21 T.O. EXIST�NG ATTCE� W I L L I A M A C O L L I N S A I A � ANTENNAS. (2) ANTENNAS PER �� �� A R C H I T E C T S, L L P � SECTOR) SEE ANTENNA DETAILS TOwER, A7T ANTENNAS & 3 � SHEET A-3 �� �� � SPRiNT ANTENNAS i , �[ � / F� �ri�rec[uvot�ociY nwva ssrwu[�:ivr m.� d ... ; VOICE � 631�8450 FiIX � b31�89-6499 � L I� �� http : / / sww . wf caia . com i - 3,� � / ; WFC PROJECE NO. 14-10552 , EXISTING UMTS CABINET TO REMAIN 1 1 5�-0"t AGL� c � �' `€ OF EXISTING & NEW �I % � � � ��\ �f T-MOBILE ANTENNAS �ono��a tssuEo�i�rum'�new �� NM I d /�/ (1) EXISTING S12000 CABINET TO REMAIN �s z o3/iv/ia lSSUEDFORREVIEW �� NM , a EXISTING GPS UNIT TO � � ( 3 04/23/14 ISSUEDFORFIIJNG JG NM �i 1� REMAIN / \ ; i ' �' '� �;:�_ �j /' %` •\ 100'-0"± AGL� o j/ \ EXIS�ING VERIZON ANTENNAS ` � � OF EXISTING VERIZON ANTENNAS �� � EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE TO REMAIN �; / ___ '� �,. �- � � NOTES: ��.. ` �� EXIS�ING 1.30 -O HIGH (t)NO CONSTRUCTION OR BIODING IS TO PROCEED 11NLES5 i � •� LATTI�E TOWER H6 -�J f AGL P�NS INClI1DE THE STATEMENT"ISSUE�FOR CONSTRUCiI�N" � / '\ � � IN THE DESCRIPTION COLUMN ABOVE.PRIOR TO BIDDING OR � / / �\ �� � OF EXISTING CARRIER ANTENNAS CON�IRM TH�EY AR�ENINAPOSSESSION OF�THE LAiESTWPLANS. ` t /, \ � �, I� i � � •\ ,\ /' � \ (24) EXISTING ANTENNA I - \. � CABLES. (3) TO BE - ��� ``� � /� . - � ,, i _.__ . . . . P . �i 'C:��� � i :.� I , _ . P WITH HYBR D _ SWA , ED _ i � � \ . .. _ . \ `€, � 1 \ � /j/.�f� '� A � ,\� �,, �� � //L. � �6„}; \:.... \ ...,.. Jj�t' ) 1� 5 � l < : . . . ' 1�- � ,. ! � v �- r 1 i � \ I 1 � , , . „ i � ( � , �. � { �� � . ` . ,;s � •� � , t� l \ < f,; � � P �,� �, �� �� ;� ; ,�= :�,�� ��� �.` t '�' �,/�' � I F .�� .•, ' �� /-'—'—'—°-� j --''� � J �� �� � `� i� � � � � � � ��� �� � � � . ���� ,, >. , '� ,� , :; . i' 1 � �, , �,� T . .l��Iob�le� �� � ���" �, �� � y`, Nortl-»�st LLC � o /� s? 3500 SUNRISE HWY. I � � EXISTING METER & DISCONNECT TO REMAIN `" SUITE D-203 I � �� s,��� � EXISTING AT&T EQUIPMENT � ''�_ � 3 , , GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 .� ,p � SH R BEYOND � . ELTE '[ � y--� � �---� �;�� � � � s ��.,� ; EXISTING T-MOBILE EQUIPMENL � _ ,�'� 1 , ,; SEE EN�ARGED EQUIPMENT PLAN STTE INFORMATION � .,�.� � ,��` r =;. , sHEET i/n-2 PECOMC �U � �:r � � �� : � I � � �'� � � EXISTING SPRINT � � (� � ' ��- I EQui�MENr sHE�TER �, �� 41405 HWY 25 '� � � �/.PF . "" PECONIC,N.Y. 11958 a `� r � � •a, ; L�1.�181 A I a EXISTING CABLE TRAY TO REMAtN �— .� � � "� � DESIGN TYPE _. .. / �..— .� . , m EXISTING 130'-0" HIGH �� � '���� f � � � � �arTicE TowER ; N - � LTE MO DERNIZATION � � � o (2) EXISTING SECTOR "A" ANTE N N A S ; �P ' y"y,� I: � ��'�"' '� � SHEET TITLE �' TO BE REMOVED & REPLACED WITH � ' �� � ' �— � � m (2) NEW AIR21 ANTENNAS. (NP. AT �� ` ���Y�� o�-o�� ENLARGED E�UIPMENT PLAN I � T" � �------------"---------"--'-; / cRA°E &NORTHEAST ELEVATION T ALL SECTORS) � � ———— — —— � � NORTHEAST ELEVATION S� �� �� � ENLARGED SITE PLAN � 0 1 � 2 SCALE: 1 16"= 1'-0" A_2 3 SCALE. 3 16" = 1'-0" �� � L H Clamp �YP�+aa. �.�1�1 Q�'�� I � EXISTING METAL ANG�E SuRaWebrmastdiammer �� _�_ 55-ttsmm TOP & BOTTOM NEW KATHREIN MOUNTING CLAMPS - #85010070, TOP & BOTTOM. SEE AMennu-mastdistenceF /26--132mm � �� � Scope ol wPp�Y 1 x Wwer clamp � DETAIL 3/A-2A ixupperdamP........._............ �� _...._........_........................_......_......................._.._...._..........._._.... _........_.... t I o Material_��vis � liotdip galvani'zed[cel/ z d NEW AIR21 ANTENNA, stain�essscoel _ �-Nuts ( Sta+riess sleei o SEE DETAIL 1/A-2A wa�ni -( aax9 , � WILLIAM E COLLINS, AIA � o � A R C H I T E C T S L L P i �:z I o *..: ..._..� .._.... �- Tcrq�e .. � 3 . �yy v..:.^,!�r � . NEW KATHREIN B +q:� ���� 1z-1 Te.CFIIdOLOGY DRrve SE'rAU[�I'.Nlr nTi3 ' a MOUNTING CLAMPS ,�,,,a,a ,� '� 7acp,e ,jr � r VOICE = 631-68�8450 FAX = 631�88-8499 ` �85010070, TOP & � �='',,,-" N"'ao""' , ! � � � Lttt : / / www . wf cala . com ', '� BOTTOM. SEE DETAIL " , � _ � 3/A-2a t� � � ❑ � � ,�� �' ``� .-� a s WFC PROJECT NO. 14-10552 � � _��.� � � ,� o O �.._ ,, V � � � c� � � a,� �, � y O � ''!_�..L.� � ... ._......_ �'.' � I 03 07 I4 ISSUED FOR PREl1MINARY REVIEW JG NM s , a `�• O � `� � '., � ! � 2 03/19/I4 6SUEDFORREVIEW JG NM '� o � O O 'j . Y� �.: ��� j� �� ;� 3 04/23/14 ISSUEDFORFNNG JG NM � � r' /� ///� , N , ' ~�=�V . Tcrqucr o EXISTING MOUNTING �� ^ �� �, �-6�;�,r I - PIPE e.. � =m:_ �. !not= rorqua � �% ��� '(,�o I, O - � - � � C M,. -00 kr � '� bwer cia=np �u{aer c:arop � _ . � � Q � � f �, �� ��a = EXISTING MOUNTING PIPE i`-`"'�-., �, /� �`��_ � � ENLARGED ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL s �� k�'� �° � �� l .� \�-� (1)NO CONSTRUCTION OR BIDDING IS i0 PROCEED UNLESS � � �(! o ��O �R'�� 1) _ oLANS INCIUDE iHE STATEYENT"ISSUED fOR CONSTRUCTION" jp 'F Atlention IN THE DESCRIPiION WIUMN ABOVE.PRIOR TO BID�ING OR SCALE: �-� Z -� -O :SJ / v��' S�, r.e�� - v�ac CONSTRUCTION,CONTRACTOR 4UST ALSO CONTACT WFC TO � � - j.� ��: EO., .,�'-�-��!.� :�- c�d�scoa..aee.-a«e � LONFIRM THEY ARE IN POSSESSION OF THE LATEST PLANS. . ..,�J i �Rd r�mtxw�v;,. 2) ...c_'-" �... ..F . Atleation! . . I� C*o ro�rem'ivc Uc r.�e.4sa.�inc �', Fqr��aa=im.�>9n 1�.A�":t;r.,:��.Mi.u:t cxmi}- U:o xk-0�•rii�nul!r:x ca M�c m;a�r��si ww NN:rmuef<!��nlenNw::h�:�a:t✓fMi-i(lt�.n .._-_.�� ' I3). snr��,�ra.annnFi; +�' . f 'i.�C''P-"_"'" .�� 'G-: . ,- \%, A : .' g'. .C I"��. D E, �. P{0'1 6 N�. � .i �/� .t�.� �i`r }�ti " ; TYP. ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL ����7�mm ���,m.n��i ��„n ` 55-1i5mm � 11Cmm 12£S 132mm:�126mm x30` !1;s f �� �;� � �� � � 1 Fiease note:Kathrein does not recomme�d to use counter nuts. .'� � � �}� �"�:. * � ` SCALE: 1�2"=1'-0" ���� � i -�' .�, I ' Replacement of antenna ��` � / s:� ��:� ���f �� r' �, y� y� / I � I �fi � 'ai i ; / I � v�� � - �: o ..rz.r � _ n� I °' ...._ z ; i. t = ANTENNA , �; z -MFG: ERICSSON � ���%�; _ ' �1 v -PART NO.: AIR 21 B4A/B2P �����e�" ' � � � m 1 � •Mobile� � MECHANICAL INFO �������°� � � �� ' .� a� � -wEicHT: ios �es. �� � ��� - -�� Nor'tF�E�25t LLC -MAX. WIND AREA: 2.9 SQ.FT. ��� �� �$ �' � -MAX. WIND LOAD (�150MPH : 580 N �`�e, ', � � � 3500 SUNRISE HWY. , 3 -MAX. WIND SPEED: 150 MPH p� ` �����''r, ' SUITE D-203 � vv. ; °� GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 � -HARDWARE MATERIAL: HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED ��e' s � m d -CONNECTOR TYPE: 7-16 DIN, FEMALE (4) �^ � : " � ' L -COLOR: GRAY / OFF WHITE r � �; s �' - ` -STANDARD MOUNTING HARDWARE: TM600899A-2 �� ��� �, � 5, STTE INFORMATION � , � �/ y��J PECOMC � ���'�� � ��k 41405 HWY 25 '� C k � . O �g� � ���� 'I �"- - + PECONIC,N.Y. 11958 �,. �i� �� Y I t z.z. �. .. .,,.. ; '. �.. � d � � � L.N 13-281 A .. ,� �i o � "'� :,: � � DESIGN TYPE _ 8" �'-o" � ,�>„v�,aamP LTE MODERNIZATION o REAR VIEW SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW S�1OW9"��P , � SHEET T1TLE i ANTENNA DETAILS L � 2 TYP. ANTENNA DETAILS MOUNTING HARDWARE DETAIL S� �� �� �' o SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0" 3 � aSCALE: NTS q-3 3 � s I ANTENNA SCHEDULE CABLE SCHEDULE GENERAL NOTES J SECTOR MDT TX-RX MANUF - MODEL� CABLE LENGTH DIA. LABEL/NOTE , TX/RX TX/RX EXIST. 1-1/4" 1 RED 1 - ALL INDICATIONS OF NORTH ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO _ � TX�RX NEyy TX/RX EXIST. 1-1/4" 2 RED VERIFY IN FIELD TRUE NORTH PRIOR TO SECTOR ANTENNA INSTA�LATION. o SAME ��RX ERICSSON AIR21 TX/RX EXIST. 1-1/4" 3 RED 2 - CABLE LENGTHS LISTED ARE APPROXIMATIONS PROVIDED BY OWNER AND I z TX�RX TX/RX EXIST. 1-1/4" 4 RED ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE USED FOR ORDERING CABLE. ALL CABLE LENGTHS , � A 40' TxIRX MUST BE VERIFIED IN FIELD. 0 � SAME � Rx N� 3 - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL BRASS TAGS (SUPPLIED BY T-MOBILE) W I L L I A M R C O L L I N S, A I A TX�RX ERICSSON AIR21 AT EACH END OF ALL ANTENNA CABLES DENOTING THE NUMBER Gr TAPE ' TX/RX MARKING BANDS AND COLOR OF TAPE MARKING BANDS. A R C H I T E C T S, L L P I 0 1X/RX 135' FlBER NOTE 1 3 4 - ANTENNA CABLES WILL BE COLOR CODED AT THE ANTENNA, FILTER MIN. CABLE BENDING RADIUS � TX/RX EXIST. 1-1/4" 1 WHITE INJECTION CABINET, JUMPER CONNECTIONS AND THE BTS CABINET. �za"rEc[�ta-oaY n�uvs �['w[7�r,rn u�t s TX�RX NEyy TX/RX EXIST. 1-1/4" 2 WHITE CABLE RADIUS VYT.PER FT. O.D. voICE = 6�1-ce�sa5o FwX� 53t-68�sqss ` SAME � RX ERICSSON AIR21 TX RX EXIST. 1-1 4" 3 WHITE 5 - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL DRIP LOOPS ON ALL ANTENNA AND ,., � / / 1/2" CABLE SUPERF�EX (FSJ-4-508) 1 1/4" 0.14 LBS 0.52" h t t � : / / w w w . w f c a i a . c o n � TX�RX TX/RX EXIST. 1-1/4" 4 WHITE JUMPER CABLES. 1/2" CABLE (LDF-4-SOB) 5" 0.15 �es. o.s3" Wl�'C PROJECT NO. 14-10552 o g �20• TX�RX 6 - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL CABLE SUPPORTS AS NEEDED ��g" CABLE (LDF-5-50A) 10" 0.33 LBS. 1.09" i,p �.� � anc - SAME ��Rx NEW TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM SPACING OF 3'-0" ON CENTER. �' j TX�RX ERICSSON AIR21 1 1/4" CABLE (LDF-6-50A) 15" 0.63 LBS. 1.55" i oso� ia tSwEnwRVREUMu�um�rs�new �� NM o TX�RX 7 - THE CONTRACTOR WILL RECORD THE LOCATION AND SERIAL NUMBERS OF � 5 8" CABLE LDF-7-SOA 20" 0.82 LBS. 1.98" z 03/19/14 �owrtpFnew � Nnn TX�RX �3g' FIBER NOTE 1 ALL ANTENNAS, ANTENNA CONTROLLER MOTORS, AND THEIR COF'RESPONDING 3 04/23/14 ISSUEDFORFlLING �� NM � INSTALLED LOCATION AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. Tx/Rx Ex�sT. �-�/4" , BLUE CABLE SIZES/LENGTHS ' -o n(�RX NEyy TX/RX EXIST. 1-1/a" 2 BLUE 8 - ALL ANDREWS MOTORS ARE GENDER SPECIFIC, AND WILL E3E WIRED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED: II _ SAME STARTING WiTH THE MALE END OF THE CABLE AT THE BTS AND CONTINUE TX/RX ERICSSON AIR21 TX/RX EXIST. 1-t/4" 3 BWE ALONG THE RUN FOLLOWING THE 'FEMALE UP RULE'. FOR SECTORS 0'-100' USE 7/8" � CABLE o ; �o TX�RX TX/RX EXIST. 1-1/4" 4 BLUE FOR SECTORS 101'-150' USE 1-1/4" 0 CABLE C 240' T��RX FOR SECTORS 151'& ABOVE USE 1-5/8" 0 CABLE SAME ��RX NEW TX RX ERICSSON AIR21 '- / NOT . E5 c TX�RX (1)NO CONSTRUCTION OR BIDOING IS TO PROCEED UNLESS � � ? SECTOR nAn SECTOR nBn SECTOR �Cn PLANS INLLUDE iHE STATEMENi"ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION" ' TX�RX 'I3S' FlBER NOTE 1 IN THE DESCRIPTION COLUMN ABOVE. PRIOR 70 BIDDING OR 0 CONSTRUCTION,CONTRACTOR MUST AL50 CONTACT WFC TO v NOTES: CONV'IRM THEY ARE IN POSSESSION OF THE UTESi PLANS. - 1 - NEW FBER CABLE FEEDS POSITIONS 1 & 2. I ' Z z z � I�, � � � �=.,-'F;�#���"�i\\ -�,,_ �� ,�, � I '� . LEGEND i ---� �_ � w u, ,''�";� ,s---,' -- %Cj� � _ � w� p-d' � l,/ �,,J �`.��;;C',i�Ei; if,Cn i � , r � EXISTING EQUIPMENT, ANTENNAS, CABLES, ETC. TO BE REMOVED a a a �: ,C9 ��� ,� i a N v� / . � ., \�, ` I— — —J i t�cl , tn / = \ ;a/�- �: ,.\ �^. �� e ` . S, � � --� ,. 1�,. } � EXISTING EQUIPMENT, ANTENNAS, CABLES, ETC. TO REMAIN " ,�� , �I . }`'.{�� P s .'.,.a_� a ���) . !' . ',1 , � I _` I - L ���': NEW EQUIPMENT, ANTENNAS, OR CABLES % , z/ � ��� v<fif:��i � �/ ��I � � OF . . -��,ta �,�' �� ��. .-: J �-�',` TMA TMA TMA �-`._„��i 0 0 z • i � T • �Moblle• � , ExisriNc Nortt-ieast LLC ERICSSON `o RB56102 UMTS �p 3500 SUNRISE HWY. i CABINET o--fl SUITE D-203 I 3 GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 I v �fl SITE INFORMATION - o--fl � PECOMC � °-0 41405 HUVY 25 ' 0 PECONIC,N.Y. 11958 0 o-� _ L1-13-281 A o--fl DESIGN TYPE ' °--� LTE MODERNIZATION a—fl o SHEET TTCLE ` °fl ANTENNA SCHEDULE � � & ROUTING SCHEMATIC � SHE��I' NUMBER REV. i d e � � A-4 3 � � — J � � � � � t t Z :� Northe� st LLC o WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA � A R C H I T E C T S, L L P o � ' 3 3500 SUNRiSE HiGHWAY GREAT RIVER, NY 1 1739 ���= � e �-1.��D� ���.��, �•J I � � ��I�` VOICE = 631-689-6450 FAX � 631-�89-8499 L 'lil'i i,�I; L t t p : / / w w w . w t c a i a . c o m — NT SITE NO. LI- 13—Z81 A rk � a SEP 1 5 2014 '��1� WFC PROJECT NO. 14-10754 CELLULAR COMMUNICATION EQUIPME o ? c d N0. W78 DBS(�1'l�dd � � �'ECONIC 4 �4OS H�%YZS, PECONIC, NY 11958 ` �_ _ ._ i I � , C 1 07 I S 14 ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY REVIEW �M ML i � ��r�� A^.,.� � 2 07 Z4 14 KSUEDFORI�EVIEW JG ML '�••' 3 09 10 14 ISSUED FOR FlLING JG ML a Ii o � J��y r t SECTION: BLOCK: 5 LOT: 1 4.001 LATITUDE: N41°02'22Z7'E I �� �" �� �,` � ��� ,,�`� ZONING: R-80,RESIDENTIAL DENSITY LONGITUDE: M2°27'23.45"W I � � � �� ;� �y /- �:f� ~* �'+� f� � ��j . CO�ORD�N�TES,wD ELEV�iqNS REFERENCED/�BOVE wERE SUPPIiED B+"T-NOBi�E NORInE�ST, rvC S3 I a� ;� i)i.+'�Y���� � �;- �4 �. -�`�:� ".,, �. '��+�'�� � � iNE MCNRECT MNCES NO w�RRI.MiES OR GUMANTEES REUTrvE TO inEiR ACCURACY OR COIAPLu�+�CE WrtH fM 2C ZO-O , � ��ti, � � ':�.•:«���... . .. > � '�..�� �,,.:z. .. . ro�cau+ce. �,..;: NOTES: : r,�� y� • �•.:' ..�qa r' `.•��� �.`..' ^':�� �"s.`s:...� . . . . � �'��� � . ._ .,, .� ,.-- ..<.. - , ..::.. :'• , r ��:: z: „":, ..F AMD P '�'�1 1 NO CONSTRUCTION OR BIDDINC IS TO PROCEED UNLESS N �E.� . ,tia �....y. ,$ .:��. ... � :i"r=:s . ... . .. . �. �`` .;2� . �"+._� . . . . ':; ::;'. ..%�.:. f.:: .� ,.. .,.� . .:...,5- .�.�'a...:_.--'s �� I �— ��. +�,:- �'� � -�,;��- ` .rs � •'Ff ��.��, �t� �,�' ;.-:.. � � . :_� �'� ',.,. � ';;�•.<� �%�- -s'---_ '' " PLANS INCLUDE THE STATEMENT"ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION" ,,..:,r,..�,a ,..,.- � ���r.� sy°���. �' �,��'K'�� �? % `',F��`'"�� ;"�' . . i,r,.. � ?*� �- '* - � � IN THE DESCRIPTION COWMN ABOVE.PRIOR TO BIDOING OR II � � � ��+�''� ^ `"y°� ��,`` � �'� '� ' LOCATION OF EQUIPMENT: RAWLAND CONSTRUCTION,CONTRACTOR YUST RL50 CONTACT WFC TO !%� � � � � ' '�a7tl"��5 �s ;; '��^ � ��t �-� "� EQUIPMENT SQUARE FOOTAGE: 375 SQ.FT.± . I o ;, . , <� �' , ..;\ r:. . .. . .� '. ,. �-. F' ...� ., aa;., . y., �_ -,, � "' `;� . . , ;�'"�' .', �, � , -� .:. . .:,: �.� � • :,fia,: . ;y.t*, � .�k ... ,.� , r. �� .. ,. ...�., .:., ... .�, F ..> ,...x ......�f✓ '.i. . � +„�:�,.:".+ , ":.. ' a:.:.,. :.< �.�: .,.� ::, �, •�;:: �„ d. ::+..: _�,:" I in ,.� _.,� .:r�",,.�, . >,,.. ,., ....�nrnx_+3�.�:,.. �:� _ ."';s,. �,.. j. . . ..-' :_ . .. . ;� �`' � <, .a..::; ., . .'�T- .. � ::: ���r, ;: � �- � : �. ��y.,#: ;-'� :.^ , :�b..'�. �� �. . ,#c.�_u . ;.; .. ,�.4� . .��.. � .: .,v.= - � . � ... z:.' :���,..,a :::,„ ..:a.. ....,.a. ,,.� „.... ..,., ,..,... ,���.:r.> •._ . �'�,;: CONFIRM THEY AR IN ��''t� .fa'`o �C�'�S� }, dw,. . � :4;�..::� ,,���-�a'� ^. �,��. �,�i g.l . � � � '�. �'d'r`" ;' °%�, " �'� "{� � �'���,�,� _„�, „ \�.:� �' � �� _� 'EQUIPMENT:(1) EXISTING S12000 CABINET, (1) EXISTING UMTS CABINET, (1) EXISTING GPS UNIT __ _ #�.'`� � �C4�„ � ;� n,� � �' .�: & (7) ACQ TELCO CABINET � ��� � �' �` � �` �,.. J `� °. � ,. ` ` � r'' 3, " ��� ��' "v`°'�� ' �,m�� � ��� �ANTENNA: (6) NEW AIR21 ANTENNAS,(3) NEW COMMSCOPE LNX-6515DS—VTM & (3) NEW RRUs ;�,�v��� ���� �� -. , �� ,� ��; � f �� ;�,nE� ��� ti%�'` � .,i��s Pc+nt�._ F � � , `�,�,,�' ..�'c'` . �:"t y ry a ;�a :�.. �" '�'' .'' �,Q' �� �SeaSOEi ,�!` rya .� ... �''°� . s ��,;. .��,d -' . � . , a . ^ , . �. . , ' .'� . �. . : � � � , � .. S�T � �� .�, � r�; �c� � �°' `r , , '�. `�_. x Ndt,,,,;.. ' � � �„' . � � . . � !i � `h:-:''� n, ' � � /,-.�.,L f's .::=-'�:, � �� � �� , . ,'`°�` '� „ . '', �`;, ' � ,� . � ;,, �� �� �.� ,. ,. ... � �i�+ � _ � , ���, 1 a� 1 , 5rh � .. .p . FWttlb . I I L.� ,/ I , ��,'` � �� ' rw I ; ip � i �� �� �. PROPERTYCOMACT. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD , � �. � "� � �`� x . . ,.�y.`` �"'d" J'„ !` 1•.' - i� , '�k ; � > a N��� .�.'�,,: i. _ � �,,, i � � °. � � I II �,7 , UTILITYCONTACT: (516) 545-7676 LIPA t•: � 1 4-.<,. ; � I ., t��� "J'��,a�i a 'Sr F��. ,,� '.�.„a H ;. . . . � , '�te ,-` �" j � _ `� !. ' � ; ,�a` �'� iy APPLICANT: T-MOBILENORTHEASTINC. �� ; _ 1 �' �, ���'r��, � �.:, s.� F i ,� � t -- . : � ; � .. . , , � � . : � ' ���,. � ;E .. :- , , � � :, .,.� �_ � , � �� : � F"�: �, �„ ,;� � �,:�: /r,� ? r � .�`.`, �,✓� Na.4y�F'mR �-��• - . `yct�afvaseu�.. � � �.y ..5;�'� �`, l A� �/�1 v+. �I , ... ., ,� ..,� �.: ,.- .� ...;.;. . . ,... •r� ., �.a;�..i _ ,: . .n'>....� . a }:,, L � � f 4 ,s������ �"`;�`�" �, �"�" m T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC 3500 SUNRISE HWY.GREAT RIVER,NY 11739 /` ,_,�3 s�� ��., ,� � � ' �r CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: PAUL LAPASOTA�631�224b651 �l�/� �°'� ��� ' ' ` x'' ENRIQUE RAMOS �=`�- '�� � '; � �.��• "�`�, � RP ENGINEER: ,� �- i� � � . .___ � raaw.a�� . .. . ��' . . a. r���t, '� ,��� ��� i;��, U J , i; I J I O II t , bil �� _ � : T � z' , ,�:, , ', �' .; , � ,; ,.� e `� `� VE - LESHEET 07/IS/14 3 09/10/14 ■■■ ■ �M e■ I � _ _ „ �, v^ � �' APPRO D .� T 1 Tff _ N i = s ,. .. , x; . ;, � � � � : ; O � DIRECTIONS: � APPROVEDASNOTED �,,, J . ' ._ , < , E � Of tl�lE'c�5� LLC , y � _. � .. ' � 07/IS/14 3 09/10/14 I PAUL LAPASOTA DATE � ��SAPPROVED/REVISE A-I SRE PLAN EN RAL N TE 3500 SUNRISE HWY. I o HEAD WEST ON WIDGEON CT TOWARD WOODHOLLOW RD. A-2 ENLARGED EDUIPMENT PLAN S NORTHEASf ELEVATION 07/15/14 3 09/10/14 SUITE D-203 � TURN RIGHT ONTO WOODHOLLOW RD. r-- '� � � � �� ��`"�' ` A-4 PCAL,DETAILS� 07/24/14 3 09/10/14 ' E GREAT RIVER NY 11739 � TURN RIGHT ONTO CHURCH RD. �` �" � ' �"", �x " � ' � TURN LEFT ONTO GREAT RIVER RD. APPROVED $]'j'E IAiFORMATION I � A-5 AMENNA SCHEDULE&ROUTING SCHEMATIC 07 1 S 14 3 09 f 0 14 I GREAT RNER RD BECOMES CONNETQUOT AVE. � APPROVEDASNOTED I PECOMC '� TAKE THE RAMP TOWARD RT-27 E. DATE DISAPPROVED/REVISE � TURN SLIGHT RIGHT ONTO SUNRfSE Hwv. ENRIQUE RAMOS � MERGE ONTO CR-51 N VIA EXIT 61 TOWARD RNERHEAD. ,,, _ . �, ;,,. 41405 HWY 25 � - K -.:-.. � . ,. � �.., .�. ,.. . � : -�s.,.�:: o TURN RIGHT ONTO CR-63N / LAKE AVE � E MORICHES RIVERHEAD RD. APPROVED PECONIC,N.Y.��958 - ENTER NEXT ROUNDABOUT AND TAKE 2ND EXIT ONTO NY-24 E / FLANDERS RD. � L.�1.3Z81 A d TURN �EFT ONTO CR-105N / CROSS RIVER DR. 0 APPROVED ASNOTED � TURN RIGHT ONTO NORTHVILLE TURNPIKE � CR-43. DANGUSTAFERRI DATE �� DISAPPROVED/REVISE DESIGN TYPE I _ TURN RIGHT ONTO SOUND AVE. � STAY STRAIGHT TO GO ONTO CR-48E / MIDDLE RD. " '�_..,.,. . � .�..„ -'-'_ � �� "�'' -t f"�'°�^ I ���,,..: y �. �...�.,, 700 MHz� UPGRADE � TURN RIGHT ONTO PECONIC LANE. �� APPROVED I � • TURN RIGHT ONTO NY-25 / MAIN ROAD. F� SHEET TIT1,E j � SITE LOCATION IS ON YOUR RIGHT AT 41405 HWY 25. � APPROVEDAS NOTED � is• ' ,�.; ��.-,� a� � � a iI � � .'�,.... . ; •.::�%; .,,,.u,., . ..„�,,. . '; . _ . . ���:�% . ,� ,_..: ,e; ,.. , o DATE � p�SAPPROVED/REVISE TITLE I , � CHRIS SCHAAF � . �: ��., �: z � � II t �\., ;�,,. � � �'�; � �;;�����,,_.fgr, .,x,,,,1�..,,. SHEET I y ..,.,. «. „ Cj APPROVED �',. `c z, � . ,;� � � ;�, c rr�- ;�s; � SHEET NLTMBER �'�• � � �� APPROVED AS NOTED �`. , �.. .._,�,;., <� .;. , .. �?�_� � �� .�, - _ � _ h . _ � _ . .� ., - - T1 � NOTE: WAYNESMITH DATE �i DISAPPROVED/REVISE � COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IS NOT PERMITTED ON PARKWAYS.VERIFYALL ROUTES. � GENERAL NOTES� -------------- 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL, , LAWS, ORDINANCES, AND REGULATIONS WHEREVER APPLICABLE � 2. EACH CaNTRACTOR SHALL BE HEID TO HAVE VISITED THE SITE AND TO HAVE VERIFIED ALL EXISTING , CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF BID. d 3. IN A�L CASES, DRAWINGS SHALL NOT BE SCALED FOR INFORMATION. FIGURED DIMENSIONS AND ; 0 CONDITIONS MUST BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD. z 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL FIELD DIMENSIONS AND JOB CONDITIONS, AND � SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS, AND/OR OMISSIONS WHICH WOULD � INTERFERE WITH THE SATISFACTORY COMPLET�ON OF THE WORK. SHOULD HE FAIL TO FO�LOW THIS � PROCEDURE AND CONTINUE wITH THE wORK, HE SHALL ASSUME ALL RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY W I L L I A M A C O L L I N S, A I A � ARISING THEREFROM. A R C H I T E C T S, L L P ' 0 5. ALL ITEMS OF WORK IDENTIFIED ON THE DRAWINGS BY NAME, NOTE, OR MATERIAL DESIGNATION ARE NEW, � 3 UNI_ESS OTHERWISE NOTED. � EXISTING T-MOBILE 6. ALL NEW MATERIALS AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURERS LATEST yoI����� ����� i - EQUIPMENT PAD. ,Q \ PRINTED SPECIFICATIONS, AND WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODE REQUIREMENTS. h t t p : / / w w w . w f c a i a . c o m SEE t�A-2 FOR oQ- � \ 7, ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH BEST STANDARD TRADE PRACTICES. EACH TRADE � ADDITIONAL � SHALL COOPERATE WITH OTHER TRADES TO FACIUTATE JOB SCHEDULING AND COMP�ETiON. WFC PROJECE NO. 14-10754 o INFORMATION ���'�o � � \ � g. PROPRIETARY NAMES IDENTIFYING ITEMS OF WORK ARE USED TO DESIGNATE THE STANDARD OF � �� D�� � � CONSTRUCTION. ITEMS OF EQUAL QUAUTY MAY BE SUBMITTED FOR THE ARCHITECTS REVIEW AND � � I 07 15 14 LSSUEDfORPREIJMINARYREVIEW IM ML � EXISTING LATTICE �/ APPROVAL. � TOWER— �� 9. EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO ADJOINING REMAINING AREAS AS A 2 m za/�a I$$UEDFORREVIEW �� ML _ � � � RESULT OF HIS WORK, AND SHALL REPAIR DAMAGED SURFACES TO THEIR PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS OR 3 091014 nSuenFortFlurv� �� nn� I c A-� \ �i AS MAY BE REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE ENTIRE SCOPE OF THE WORK. , � \ EXISTING BUILDINGS 10. ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING WORK SHALL BE PATCHED AND FINISHED, AS NECESSARY, TO MATCH EXISTING � � � CONTIGUOUS SURFACES OR NEW FINISHES SHOWN. � �� � � � \ 11. AT THE COMPLETION OF EACH WORKDAY, EACH TRADE SHALL BE RESPONSBLE FOR CLEANING UP THEIR I �, � I WORK. RUBBISH REMOVAL SHALL BE DONE IN A DUST INHIBITIVE FASHION, AND THE JOB SITE SHALL BE ��R Ga� � "" ��SFCT�R EXISTING PROPANE FREE OF ALL DEBRIS AND BROOM CLEAN UPON COMPLETION. ._ F,� 2 \ ... / 20• e. TANK (TYP.) 12 CLEAN ALL FLOORS, WALLS, DOORS, MISC., GLASS, ETC. LEAVING JOB FREE OF DUST AND DEBRIS, PRIOR ' - � . � TO PROJECT COMPLETION. r+ores: r (t)NO CONSTRUCTION OR BIDDING IS TO PROCEED UNLESS �. E 13. EXISTING EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS TO BE REMOVED, WHICH ARE NOT REOUIRED TO BE RELOCATED OR PlANS INLLUDE THE S7ATEMENi"ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION' � � RETAWED BY THE OWNER, SHAL� BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND BE REMOVED FROM IN THE OESCRIPTION COLUMN ABOVE.PRIOR 70 BIDDING OR 'v �3� NEW T-MOBIIE ��� � / CONSTRUCTION,CONiRACTOR MUST ALSO CONTACT WFC 10 � COMMSCOPE TNE PREMISES. CONFIRM THEY ARE IN POSSESSION OF iHE UTEST PLANS. ' � LNX-6515DS-VfM �� � 14. INDICATIONS OF WORK TO BE REMOVED ARE GENERAL ONLY, AND ARE NOT WTENDED TO SHOW ALL ITEMS ANTENNAS (TYP. (1) PER WHICH MAY REQUIRE REMOVAL. SUCH ITEMS SHALL BE REMOVED, RELOCATED, AND/OR REINSTALLED, AS SECTOR) � REQUIRED FOR WSTALLATION OF NEW WORK. � 15. THESE DOCUMENTS DO NOT AUTHORIZE DETERMINING THE PRESENCE, NOR THE REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS �r''�"i,,� (6) NEW AIR21 \ OR OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. IF DURING THE COURSE OF THE PROJECT, ASBESTOS OR OTHER ���' '��(� � T-MOBILE ANTENNAS. `1 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL CONTAMINATION IS SUSPECTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHA�L NOTIFY THE CARRIER'S � ���D ��` , /�� / �avE�,���1/��� �`�\ (TYP. (2) PER SECTOR � � PROJECT MANAGER WITHIN 24 HOURS. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUSPEND WORK IN THE AFFEC7ED AREA UNTIL / ��'��F,� / `�(j� `�� � SUCH A TIME THAT SAID AREA IS CERTIFIED CONTAMINATION-FREE. IN THE INTERIM, THE CONTRACTOR J'(L� /` �' �.�%� 2 �\�� �I '`, /'� \'� SHALL ENDEAVOR TO RESCHEDULE WORK TO AREAS UNAFFECTED BY SUSPECTED CONTAMINATION IN J,�tj. ��i` �e�,� � � ;i , PROPERTY LINE � '� ,/� O ORDER TO MINIMIZE DELAY TO THE PROJECT SCHEDULE. �(, y �"' . ' �g i - .� \';� \ � 16. ALL MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE IN FULL CONFORMANCE WITH N.Y.S. UNIFORM FIRE 'i � � �� ) � I ' �' � � \ PREVENTION AND BUILDING CODE, AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS. �l _°� EXISTING `� � / ISTING STORAGE 17. ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE INSTALLED BY AN ELECTRICIAN LICENSED IN SUFFOLK COUNTY IN ` '''� �� � � OVERHEAD WIRES � � � ��� �� CONTAINER ACCORDANCE WITH NEW YORK STATE AND NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODES. A NEW YORK BOARD OF FIRE ' � r ' t� ,�'� \ BUIL G UNDERWRITER'S CERTIFtCATE SHALL BE OBTAINED FOR ALL ELECTRICAL WORK, AND SUPPLIED TO THE '�' ` C•� y � , ,,; EXISTING OPEN DIRT AREA ` /� EN ANCE OWNER AND ARCHITECT. � � � v "� J � � 18 PROVIDE ANY AND ALL TREATED WOOD BLOCKING/BACKING OR 14 GA. GALV. FLAT STOCK BACKWG AS I ���-``�"' .�� ���� ; � �\ \ Uj� REQUIRED TO ENSURE PROPER AND ADEQUATE SUPPO R T (�N COMPL IANCE WITH NEW YORK STATE SE� 1 J �,Cf� ���`' o EXISTING DOG KENNEL \�� � � BUILDING CODE MINIMUM LOADING REQUIREMENTS WHERE APPLICABLE) OF VARIOUS ITEMS INCLUDING, BUT � � � �� NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED T0, HANDRAILS, CABWETRY, SHELVING. HANDICAP GRAB BARS, TOILET z �� ACCESSORIES, CABLE TRAYS, CONDUITS, ETC. � - PO 19 ADA COMPLIANCE: THE FACIUTY IS A NORMALLY UNOCCUPIED MOBILE RADIO FACILITY. ,�°`W� ■ ��.�jll��I�! o EX�ST�N� ASPHA�T �° GENERAL SITE NOTES- � � �� Nortt-�east LLC ' o � P 1. ALL SITE WORK TO CONFORM TO THE LATEST MUNICIPALITY PLANNING BOARD SPECIFICATIONS AND Y �, � STANDARDS. 3500 SUNRISE HWY. 3 EXISTING POUCE STATION - 2. 'DEWATER' ALL TRENCHES AS REQUIRED DURING INSTALLATION OF ALL FOOTING AND FOUNDATION TO SUITE D-203 GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 m ENSURE PROPER DEPTH AND STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF CONCRETE. L 3. THE DEVELOPER SHALL COMPLY WITH APPROVED WORKING DRAWINGS AND REQUIREMENT SHEETS. NO STTE INFORMATION DEVIATION WILL BE PERMITTED EXCEPT BY WRITTEN APPROVA� OF MUNCIPAUTY PLANNING BOARD. � 4. COMPACTION UNDER STRUCTURES, BUILDING SIABS, STEPS, PAVEMENTS AND WALK WAYS SHALL BE 95� PECOMC c MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY, ASTM D 1557. COMPACTION UNDER LAWNS OR IN UNPAVED AREAS, 85� MAXIMUM 41405 HWY 25 0 oRY oENsin, asTM � �ss�. PECONIC,N.Y. 11958 � 5. ALL ELECTRIC AND TELEPHONE SERVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND. 0 6. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO TONE PATH OF EXISTING CABLE AND PROVIDE MARK-OUTS. HAND EXCAVATE L�1.�281 A NEAR ANY UNDERGROUND PIPES, UTIUTIES, OR STRUCTURES. DESIGN TYPE 7_ VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITHIN AREAS OF WORK. PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY � MEANS OF PROTECTION OF SAID EXISTING UTILITIES AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE NEW WORK. 7OO MHZ^' UPGRADE - COORDINATE AL� REQUIRED RELOCATION WORK WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY PROVIDER. �0 8. ALL WASTE MATERIAL INCLUDING RUBBISH, STUMPS, DEBRIS, ETC., SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE SHEET T1Tf-E _ CONTRACTOR AND BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE. SITE PLAN TN 9. CONTRACTOR TO MINIMIZE THE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROL ` MEASURES, IF REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION, SHA�L BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL &GENERAL NOTES N � GUIDELINES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. ALL CONCRETE USED FOR ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION SHEET NUMBER REV � ��� ARCHTECTURAL SITE PLAN SHA�� BE A�R ENTRA�NEo, M�N�M�M 4,00o Ps� AT �8 oAYs 10. IF EXISTING GRAVEL BEDDING IS REMOVED, STOCKPILE, AND RESPREAD AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE � � SCALE: 1"=200�-0�� N�RTH NEW WORK. RESTORE LANDSCAPE FILTER FABRIC AS WELL. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL MATERIALS AS REQUIRED. A- 1 3 � 11. FINAL GRADE SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM THE PCS EQUIPMENT AND TOWER AREAS. L I , ----_____ ____ --- ----- NOTE: -""" -- DkAWINGS UEPIGt 1kiE INSIALLAlION OF ANiENNAS, CABLING, ETC. ' THAT ARE TO BE PLACED ON AN EXISTING LATTICE TOWER — � STRUCTURE. A STRUCIURAL ANALYSIS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY EXISTING AT&T ANTENNAS I � OTHERS, PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW ANTENNA COMPONENTS, AS REQU'�REC i0 EVALUATE THE EXISTING LATTICE , o TOWER STRUCTURE FOR ADEQUACY OF SUPPORT FOR THE NEWLY , . APPLIED LOADS OF THE NEW EOUIPMENT. ANALYSIS SHALL BE EXISTING SPRINT ANTENNA;— � � PERFORMED BY A NEW YORK STATE LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ! z ENGINEER. THE EVALUATION REPORT AND REMEDIAL DESIGN IF 6 NEW AIR21 T-MOBILE I °� REQUIRED SHALL BE SiGNED AND SEALED BY OTHERS. OWNER SHALL � � i o BE RESPONSBLE FOR VERIFYiNG STRUCTURAL ADEQUACY OF THE ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO EXISTING � ExiSTiNG �arTiCE TOwFR PIPE MOUNTS. (TYP. (2) ANTENNAS � PER SECTOR). SEE DETAILS ON _ 130'-0"± AGL W I L L I A M E C O L L I N S, A I A I � SHEET A-4 FOR MORE C EXISTING LATTICE A R C H I T E C T S, L L P Y INFORMATION. TOWER, A7T ANTENNAS & � 0 3 SPRINT ANTENNAS - iz-�Tec[�wowc;Y n�uve serwu�r.tvY ur� , �' EXISTING UMTS CA8INET TO REMAIN AND �ol� � �-�-8°5° F'°'X ' �-�a�-sas� o �' TO BE INTERNALLY MODIFIED b < < P � � � www . wtcaia . com \ ' �3 177'-2"t AGL � � r.a Exisrwc & NEw WFC PROJECT NO. 14-10754 � � \ 1-MOB�LE ANTENNAS � (t) EXISTING 512000 CABINET TO REMAIN (3) NEW COMMSCOPE �, �. �� �� ctnc - /� EXiSTiNG GPS UNiT r0 /� \ LNX-6515DS-VfM T-MOBILE � � ' PIPE MOUNTS, ('TYP. (1 ANTENNA ?,F �; I o REMAIN ----- /' � ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO EXISTING � m is ia 65UEDFORPREIJMINARYREVIEW inn nn� i Z 07/24 14 ISSUEDFORREVIE�V JG ML � � � � ` ` � 3 09 I O/14 6$UEp FOR Fll1NG JG ML ` /' '� PER SECTOR) SEE ANTENNA DETAILS C- � ON SHEEf A-3 FOR MORE ` � /.� �� � INFORMATION. �;: I 0 100'-0"± A . GL - i € - d � EXISTING CHAWLINK FENCE TO REMAIN ` � ' � OF EXISTING VERIZON ANTENNAS / � � / '� � /� \ EXISTING VERIZON AN7ENNAS �: � �' � �: i / � �` � � EXISTING ACQ TELCO CABINET NOTES' 5 .\ � � (1)NO CONSTRUCTION OR BIDDING IS TO PROCEED UNLESS I� � `'�� .. � PLANS IN i . . CLUDE THE TAT � S EMENi'ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION" \ _ 86'-5"f AGL , EXISTING 1 ' HI H .. .30 Q Ci IN TH . . .. E DESCRIPiI N . . 0 COWMN A V . .. . BO E.PRI R T . .. 0 0 BIDDING � � � OR , ..., . .,. ����� CONSTRUCTION CONTRAC70RN T ' � OF EXISTIN I . us AL50 CONTACT WFC T G CARRER ANTENNA o \ LATTICE TOWER S ' - / *� � f"+, CONfIRM THEY ARE IN PoSSESSION OF 7HE IATESi PUNS. � /� � \ � ; �b /, � � �, \ I ' � �\ (24) EXISTING ANTENNA "�� . � f�, `•� � cae�Es. (3) To aE �- : # ; �\ � '� SWAPPED WITH HYBRID � ; �,� I � �� `� \ ` � �� � ' ; 3"' � � �� V `� � h�EN � � �� i r` ���'Y , � \� � ��� 1�.`! / �.11".,��.�.� ��i ,�� I 1 �. '� �� .ay. R E: , at, �; i � �� r ' F, � t '� . � �`'3 / _ -�� �� ,� \::_ c,� - 1._> -- ; '� \ / /--�—�—,—.� ,�i C: � �J;` �. f ;� F � . .._.._ _ , I � \ � � t � � �� ..-,.. � � �J� ��1�'v �� ," � � ��,' _„ �.,. �� .. � . . P� ���.„ '�. � � � '� r;�� �' � � { �; , � � _._._- �,.: � y Z �_� �'�� `� � �'� ,�' � �1'� 5 �,� �I �i� � ' SEP 1 ?���� �:� �, .� � . . � :I: . .l��Iobile� ' � '� �y µ ,�'"- � � / EXISTING METER & DISCONNECT TO REMAIN M� i j �,�� �� � � � �� � Nortf-�east LLC y � � y ,.r... "�"""""" 3500 SUNRISE HWY. 3 ���� �`'�� EXISTING A7&T EQUIPMENT ����� ( �; SUITE D-203 I t ��� � SHELTER (BEYOND)- �' �( GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 EXISTING T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT. o � � " �/ , i � �, SEE ENLARGED EQUIPMENT PLAN STTE INFORMATION � .;�w . , _ ,E: sHEEr i/a-z PECOMC � � ExisTiNc sPRiNT � ��=i 41405 HWY 25 � EXISTING CABLE TRAY TO REMAIN EQUIPMENT SHELTER ° - EXISTING 130'-0" HiGH � �arncE TowE�z �"� � � PECONIC,N.Y. 11958 � a (1) NEW T-MOBILE COMMSCOPE ,� I ` L�/3281A , _ µ� � LNX-6515DS-VTM ANTENNA MOUNTED /� —�' `_; � - (2) NEW AIR21 T-MOBILE TO EXISTING PIPE MOUNT (TYP. (1) ,� _—� M : DFSIGN 'I1'PE I -� ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO EXISTING PER SECTOR). SEE DEfAILS ON � � ' } � ' �---------� 700 MHz- UPGRADE � PIPE MOUNTS. (TYP. (2) PER SHEEf A-3 FOR MORE INFORMATION. i 1"w � I � SECTOR). SEE DEfAILS ON SHEET ' " °a ` ` '�_ � � A-4 FOR MORE INFORMATION. + 'f tt ' I SHEET TjTLE r � (1) NEW RRU TO BE INSTALLED. �f, r� � . �' � ; � " � ENLARGED E�UIPMENT PLAN r (nrP. (i) PER SECTOR). SEE '� , ' ' � �' � _ o'-o" ', DEfAIL 3/A-3 FOR MORE T" � -------------"="==-' ' ♦ cRAOE & NORTHEAST ELEVATION � INFORMATION. �--- ------ -� SHEET NUMBER REV. £ ENLARGED EQUIPMENT PLAN � n NORTHEAST ELEVATION � 1 SCALE: 3/'6'" - �'--0" NO� L SCALE: 1/16"= 1'-0" � I � A-Z � 0 o � Z - I � , 0 � � W I L L I A M E C O L L I N $ A I A o ' A R C H I T E C T S, L L P 3 � � �� NEw coMMscoPE aNTENrvn Description Value � � " ua�ct�ro[.oGY nEuve serwu�r.rn urja � s Dimensions with Solar Shield and Handle �o�cE � �-�-�o F.vc � �-��s� - h t t p : / / w w w . w f c a i a . c o m o Height 500 mm WFC PROJF.C'T NO. 14-10754 = Width 431 mm � �� �� � o NEw nNDREw �, ' DB380-5083 (., De tIl 182 mm I 07 IS 14 ISSUEDFORPRELIMINARYREVIEW IM ML `m MOUNTING BRACKETS- � 2 7/24 14 ISSUEDFORRENEW JG ML 0 Weight 3 91014 ISSUEDFORFlIING JG ML - RRUS 11 23 kg I � � Ex�sT�Nc MouNT�Nc Co{or � PIPE s; Gra " � �. � �.��` Y � = ERicssoN MouNnNc � (i)For RRUS 11 87,2x30W is guaranteed for operating ambient temperatures<+50°C.For ._ BRACKETs higher temperatures,2x20W is gua�anteed. NoTES: , d (I)NO CONSiRUCTION OR BIDDING IS TO PROCEED UNLESS e ERicssoN " (2)Detailed information about LTE licences can be found in LiC2nSB Manag2l712nt. Detarled PLANS INCLUDE THE STATEMENT"ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION" �� f�I�U51 1 ei z a„ information aboui WCDMA licences can be found in Licenses and Hardwa�e Activation IN THE DESCRIPTION COIUMN ABOVE.PRIOR TO BIDDING OR ' � CONSTRUCTION,CONTRACiOR MUST AL50 CONTACi WFC TO � COdBS. CONRRM THEY ARE IN POSSESSION Of THE LITEST PLANS. (3)RRUS 11 for 612 has a bandwidth that is 2 MNz narrower than 3GPP. The supported frequency corresponds to EARFCN(Channel Numbers)of 50i0-5169 in downlink and ' " 23010-23169 rn uplink. The RRUS 11 size, height, width, and depth with solar shield, is shown in ����j�.''' ~�,� I Figure 2. , a�:�� +�,, TYP. ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL � � - ��`� - ,. , ,., � sca�E: ,�z"=,'-o" ��`� � ;,;� ` � �a'�� � _ 3 JI' I �� 7�8 � 1' � ' t'. '!� . . � �.. ;; �� ��`- ��—....---as, ---.._—►i � � � '' �' � j '� •' ;� i r l_ ;�,�� f� � ,� � ,.\`;•`�y'�� , � 182 �;� o i, i` _..M'_�_ L 20" HX 17" WX7" D ' ' % z b 50.7 LBS f, � / � ' T Mobile o AN MFGAANDREW SOLUTIONS - COMMSCOPE �'/r/!(' � 5OO ' ' • • • � -PART NO.: WX-6515DS-VTM _ �� North��st LLC o MECHANICAL INFO ! / -WEIGHT: 50.3 LBS. ' ' � 3500 SUNRISE HWY. y � SUITE D-203 3 -MAX. WIND LOAD: 879.0 N@ 150 KM/H ;' a -MAX. WIND SPEED: 150 MPH / GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 i r -HARDWARE MATERIAL: HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED o ^ � SITE INFbRMATION - -CONNECTOR TYPE: 7-16 DIN, FEMALE-BOTTOM-6 i o -COLOR: LIGHT GRAY/FBERGLASS UV RESISTANT cn � PECOMC -STANDARD MOUNTING HARDWARE: DB380-5083- � STANDARD TWO POINT MOUNTING SYSTEM TO � sEcuRE Bsa PANE�s To PiPEs wiTr+ o0 41405 HWY 25 � MEnsuRiNc zn-4.s" (6o-i i snnM). iNc�u�Es Unit of ineasurement mm s;�---- ��,;�,A PECONIC,N.Y. 11958 °' LOCKING DOWNTI�T BRACKETS AND HEAVY GAUGE �' U-�.3-Z8�/A a BRACKETS TO PROVIDE SUPERIOR WINDLOAD �'�� ' ' '" � PERFORMANCE. ;�j1f j�' � DESIGN TYPE �- UNIT OUTPUT POWER ' C�f) � 5 n,n � ` � � Zu i�r 700 MHz� UPGRADE o RRUS 11 612 2x30 w F SHEET T1T'LE �� £ d o 0 0 ; ANTENNA DETAILS z � � " SHEET NUIvfBER REV. � TYP. ANTENNA DETAILS TYP. RRUS-11 DETAIL Q 'g 2 SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0" , / \-� 3 � -0 3 SCALE: NTS TOP VIEW REAR VIEW SIDE VIEW Ciamp J EXISTING METAL ANGLE NEW KATHREIN MOUNTING CIAMPS TOP & BOTTOM Ciamp o �� #85010070, TOP & BOTTOM SEE i t DETAIL 3/A-3 TYpe�. ��1'007� oSuitaWe tor ma5t diamoter : 55-115 mm Z . ... .... .......... ......_.... ..__.__ .._.._._............_. NEW AIR21 ANTENNA. Antenna-mastdistanceF : i2A �32mm _ � Scope ot supply ; 1 x IOwer clamp II o SEE DETAIL 1�A-3� t xuppercvamp . � Material-Clamp � Hot-dip galvanized steel -5crews HoFtlip gaivanized stee r W I L L I A M E C O L L I N$ A I A � Stain�ess steei A R C H I T E C T S, L L P ' 3� -Nuts � Sta�nless steei ��, ..°�£ 4Nei ht 4.3 k � 3 9 9 � NEW KATHREIN �x-�,[ic[u�rot�cY DxrvE se�,pv[�,� m n� , MOUNTING CLAMPS SEI L �85010070, TOP & ; F��� �I p�.��_w w . w fpc a•f�a�o m , o BOTTOM. SEE DETAIL ; O �;` , T�r ue 3/A-3 �� � ` Q o �,....(�y/,�f� '.,.=�°a� WFC PROJE(,'T NO. 14-10754 . � �g � � •t� _. _ . __'�ry � r� i( �. � ��I � �£ O . � f �.,:TO��'� f �rJ p No. a�� nrsca8„ow � � � : ; . � � ��~�` /.-� � " 1 07 IS 14 ISSUEDFORPREIJMINAM'REVIEW IM ML �p�e 1 E I O ❑ f ..�}t /�� �Q `.p �,u 2 07Z4/14 KSUEDFORREVIEW JG ML � � "�� �� t J� ��' �y G.�- �`. ..K;v 3 09 10 I4 ISSUED FOR FILING JG ML ; I c .,,.� J .... [YT�� ,- � N � _ .. � .. ' �j' ' -o EXISTWG MOUNTING ��"�f�" 1 � �� PIPE r` � f ; � � \`~� 0 1. � t � '� `y��s � i�''� ', '' '� ,� , �������� - Torque �' EXISTING MOUNTING PIPE �����_`•�1 ' ' C�r "'''"``"'" . ._ E �. ,. rw; �,ao1 ! ....� � ' R ' �... B" .:' . .. TO(qUe � 1:�� � NOTES: �. d ' � - - t . - � ^ . �� , (i)NO CONSTRUCTION OR BIOWNG IS t0 PROCEED UNLESS � � ENLARGED ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL � � ���ef��mP upperciamp ^°•-°�Nn ; e a PLANS INCLUDE THE STATEMENi"ISSUED FOR CONSTRUC710N" � '\� .m IN THE DESCRIPTION COLUMN ABOVE.PRIOR TO BIDDING OR � SCALE: �-��Z =� -O �� �� � � —A., � � CONSTRUCTION,CONTRACTOR MUST AL50 CONTACT WFC TO I N r� ..��,�� ��. "�� CONFIRM THEY ARE IN POSSESSION OF THE lA7EST PUNS. �i � � l j�"�^y : -'� ' � .,'L,"� � ; �! � p . . �" — ��; �u, I :�\ � `1�� ja f ^~ '- , � :� , - .. , . � ���o; ( � � :... • �„� n�,no�� � � �; - _ � ������ ./i; sv�raxm���W�,,,s�.M, . .�� � TYP. ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL �~ °�"`�'�° "��'���°��'�`� � ` ,'�� ���������� � � ,� . r .�� „���.,�,� � � �'I1,: .�'�d�.�� �A� ��� SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0" -...;..-t..,• F Attenuon� 2��� o i�'��'' � �� 2' � SEP 15 al�,� , ; � ,�, � .r-•_�, oo�,.�m��-w���� ; F.fJ %� NGc4 �� � � FwmE�mum�Wa+mau�%�e�.�k 3 %/-��,G�`�" ���'� '� � `� a»s�r,+ac�rg r+��(�s a�ror_�:wae��arw s J i 1°,�J' ��," �i i . anNwetdf MMt X vt2h 8 Mrc:ut M_'..^Nm. . . � ,� , , s "�,,.,_- � � ��rwsn.m�,an.sa�eer,�. �.� !� r �' �� . - `� �� L .�-. w.�.<-..�..,g. �,d ... ' - '�;, �� * ,, : _ ' _ 1 ,t ' � ;, 1 � R A ' � � � � �� � � Repiacement of antenna '� .,:r- � 17d mm 88 mm � 88 mm :� 55-Y 15 mm ] 110 mm 928-132 mm 128 mm j t30° � � �' � Piease note:Kathrein does not recommend to use cou�ter nuts. -- � v `� I ,✓_ cc _._." � / , U A O F t�!� �/ i _,,.,� , ' �' � `1 `�_.____��� � o ,,.Ka . ; �` � � ANTENNA , ' z -MFG: ERICSSON q�y j� R � � � -PART NO.: AIR 21 B4A�B2P ��� �; ? � ■ ■ ■ ■M � ■ I � MECHANICAL WFO ��� �%� °� +a � jT j�b���j � � � I � -wEicHT: i o5 �Bs. �. �� � ' No►'tf7east LLC � I .^ MAX. WIND AREA: 29 SO.FT. m -,,.' � i � -MAX. WIND LOAD (�150MPH): 580 N ������� �� "� 3500 SUNRISE HWY. `o -MAX. WIND SPEED: 150 MPH � ��w y? SUITE D-203 � =HARDWARE MATERIAL HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED �� �� ��� � � z�-=y GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 i CONNECTOR TYPE 7-16 DIN FEMALE 4 �,`�. � . � ) �z � L -COLOR: GRAY / OFF WHITE � ������ �� SITE INFORMATION ` -STANDARD MOUNTING HARDWARE: TM600899A-2 ������£��": �� I o �$'s�,a�� 9� ,, 14," � PECOMC � � ___ , o . --"'" 41405 HUVY 25 � t � � ,�� �s) PECONIC,N.Y. 11958 , o _ _ �---:i"r •�� .:s..- ��-�= L�1.�281 A � � . _ f i�� ��� DESIGN TYPE � � 8'� �'-o" �f �� �;! I 700 MHz� UPGRADE o REAR VIEW SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW i ' � - i $HEE'T TTTT..E ' '� _._. ' `*�"pP"°"'^'u TYPICAL DETAILS � � t 5)lowar clump � - I . ( I � $HE'ET NUMBER REV. � ' TYP. ANTENNA DETAILS TYP. MOUNTING HARDWARE DETAIL A � 2 SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0" 3 SCALE: NTS , `'� 3 � � ANTENNA SCHEDULE CABLE SCHEDULE GENERAL NOTES I J SECTOR MDT TX-RX MANUF - MODEL�/ CABLE LENGTH DIA. LABEL/NOTE 7x Rx TX/RX EXIST. 1-1/4" 1 RED � - ALL INDICATIONS OF NORTH ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO � VERIFY IN FIELD TRUE NORTH PRIOR TO SECTOR ANTENNA INSTALLATION. , o TX�RX NEyy TX/RX EXISL 1-1/4" 2 RED I t SaME � RX ERICSSON AIR27 Tx RX ExiST. 1-i a' 3 RED � / � 2 - CABLE LENGTHS LISTED ARE APPROXIMAiIONS PROVIDED BY OWNER AND z TX�RX TX/RX EXIST. 1-1/4" 4 RED ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE USED FOR ORDERING CABLE. ALL CABLE LENGTHS °' TX/RX MUST BE VERIFIED IN FIELD. � R 3 - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL BRASS TAGS (SUPPUED BY T-MOBILE) W I L L I A M E C O L L I N S A I A � � A a0' SaME ��RX ERICSSON AIR21 � AT tACri "tND OF ALL ANTENNA CABLCS CENCTING THE NUMBER OF ?P.PE � TX/RX � MARKING BANDS AND COLOR OF TAPE MARKING BANDS. A R C H I T E C T S, L L P 3 �/RX NEyy 4 - ANTENNA CABLES WILL BE COLOR CODED AT THE ANTENNA, FILTER MIN. CABLE BENDING RADIUS � SAME ��Rx COMMSCOPE - INJECTION CA8INET, JUMPER CONNECTIONS AND THE BTS CABINET. iz-t�rec.�[-nvOi.ocY nxrvE serwcn�r,rn u�+ CABLE RADIUS WT.PER FT. O.D. voice � �-�-saso Fnac � �-cav-sasv LNX-6515DS-VTM Lttp : / / www . wica i a . com � TX�RX 5 - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL DRIP LOOPS ON ALL ANTENNA AND ��2" CABLE SUPERFLEX (FSJ-4-SOB) 1 1/4" 0.14 LBS 0.52" o TX/RX 135' FIBER NOTE 1 JUMPER CABLES. 1/2" CABLE (LDF-4-506) S" 0.15 LBS. 0.63" WFC PROJF:CT NO. 14-10754 � TX/RX EXIST. i-1/4" 1 WHITE 6 - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL CABLE SUPPORTS AS NEEDED ��g" CABLE (�DF-5-SOA) 10" 0.33 LBS. 1.09" Np, p�Te pascxx�t�ort � � TX�RX NEyy TX/RX EXIST. 1-1/4" 2 WHITE TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM SPACING OF 3�-0�� ON CENTER. - SAME ��RX ERICSSON AIR21 TX/RX EXIST. i-7/4" 3 WHITE 1 1/4" CABLE (LDF-6-SOA) 15" 0.63 LBS. 1.55" i m is ia LCSUEDFORPREl1MINARYREVIEW inn ML TX�RX TX/RX EXIST. 1-1/4" 4 WHITE 7 - THE CONTRACTOR WILL RECORD THE LOCATION AND SERIAL NUMBERS OF � 5 8" CABLE �DF-7-SOA 20'� 0.82 LBS. 1.98" z o�za ia lSSUEDFORREVIEW �� M� TX�RX ALL ANTENNAS, ANTENNA CONTROLLER MOTORS, AND THEIR CORRESPONDING 3 09 IO ia lSSUEDFORFILING �� ML INSTALLED LOCATION AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. - ES LENGTHS nc Rx CABLE SIZ c SAME � N� '^ g 120° �(�RX ERICSSON AIR27 8 - ALL ANDREWS MOTORS ARE GENDER SPECIFIC, AND WILL BE WIREO � TX/RX STARTING WITH THE MALE END OF THE CABLE AT THE BTS AND CONTINUE UNLESS OTHERWISE N07ED: ' 4 ALONG THE RUN FOLLOWING THE 'FEMALE UP RULE'. FOR SECTORS 0'-100' USE 7/8" 0 CABLE •� TX�RX FOR SECTORS 101'-150' USE 1-t/4" 0 CABLE SAME ��Rx COMMSCOPE FOR SECTORS 151'& ABOVE USE 1-5/8" m CABLE I LNX-6515DS-VTM TX/RX r+oTEs: � � (1)NO CONSTflUCTION OR BIDOING IS TO PROCEEU UNLESS ' ^ TX�RX 135' FIBER NOTE � n r n n � n PlANS INCLUDE THE STATEMENT"ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION" � ' � TX�RX TX�RX EXIST. 1-1�4�� 1 BLUE SECTOR A SECTOR B SECTOR C IN 7HE DESCRIP710N COLUMN ABOVE.PRIOR TO BIDOING OR �. � TX/RX N� TX�RX EXIST. �—��4 Z BLUE CONSTRUCTION,CONTRACTOR MU57 ALSO CONTACT WFC TO I � SAME LONfIRM THEY ARE IN POSSESSION OF THE LATEST PLANS. TX/RX ERICSSON AIR21 Tx/RX ExiST. �-t/4" 3 BLUE I TX�RX i X/RX EXIST. 1-t/4" 4 BLUE I TX/RX i ..__� I C 240' SAME �/RX ERICSSON AIR21 '�'��^;�`-� �•''���� , � �:<�� '�-�C TX/RX %%,�7���a'`1DiF�^jq" �!\\� , '� L�� TX RX ; r :.�;'' �n (C� � �? / NEW f r:� � 2 ' SAME � Rx COMMSCOPE r ���� � �, - � TX/RX LNX-6515DS-VTM (� ,�.; � : '� v� � TX/RX :-= ` � 11 � TX/RX 135' FlBER NOTE 1 1 � �_k� -� � � � J �v-.. / 1�I�EW FIBER CABLE FEEDS POSIT�ONS 2 & 3. Q��� zey ' n` t�'��' � J TMA TMA ' TMA i 0 z - - T • �Mobile• � LEGEND ExisTiNc '� � �' ' `�t Northeast LLC I � ERICSSON � �' ��' 3500 SUNRISE HWY. �; , � EXISTING EQUIPMENT, �� ,CABINET � �' �" � � /, � � � 3 � ANTENNAS. CABLES, ETC. 1 i � � SUITE D-203 ��� � EW HYBRID FIBER SE� � � ZO�`� _ � GREAT RIVER, NY 11739 TO BE REMOVED / �- � ' � ' CABLES II ;'j- ;' SiTE INFORMATION � , EXISTING EQUIPMENT / , PECOMC _ ,. � ANTENNAS, CABLES, ETC. ' %� / � ' ,, „� � .a TO REMAIN ,' / - ;' �, 41405 HWY 25 � i o ' / PECONIC N.Y. 11958 � � � ; �-0 � /, - — I IPM NT % EX STING EQU E / 6--0 z � � i � Lh 13-281 A T T ANT NNAS E C. 0 E i ' � �— =� REMAIN WITH POSSIBLE � j / ' IN7ERNAL MODIFICATIONS % DESIGN TYPE ` i�, o--fl __— 700 MHz� UPGRADE a � �� o NEW EQUIPMENT, /' SHEET TiTI-E ANTENNAS, OR CABLES m ' ; ' a—fl ANTENNA SCHEDULE , // o—o m �/ & ROU TING SCHEMATIC L � �" � , SHEET NUMBER REV. � �' � � A-5 3 � � L