The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAGM:Glass Sand, Waste Mgmt Testing, Approvals Contract New York 'State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Solid & Hazardous Materials, Region One Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 _ Phone: (516) 444-0375 FAX: (516) 444-0231 John P. Cahill Commissioner August 10, 1999 The Honorable Jean W. Cochran Supervisor Town of Southold Town Hall .59095 Main Road - Southold,New York 11971 Dear Supervisor Cochran: The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation("Department")recently had an opportunity to visit the Waste Management facilities in Brooklyn NY which manufacture the glass sand being used in the Southold Landfill as grading material beneath the liner. What came to light during this inspection was that Waste Management does not have sufficient space at that facility to stockpile glass sand prior to shipping the material to Southold. Because the landfill is closed and no longer can accept material for disposal,it is necessary that the Department approve all materials being brought into the landfill for grading if they are not clean soils and sands. To help minimize the costs, the Department agrees to allow Waste Management to stockpile glass sand on the Southold landfill grounds prior to its sampling and being used for grading. The stockpiles must be staged within the footprint of the landfill. Glass sand will be stockpiled to approximately 5000 cubic yards at which time a representative sample will be collected and analyzed. A sampling plan will be generated by Town consulting engineers Dvirka and Bartilucci,agreed to by Waste Management and approved by the Department prior to any glass sand shipment. In the event that the material is not suitable for use as grading material at Southold landfill, Waste Management will remove and properly dispose of it at their own expense in a timely fashion. Once a pile is sampled, no new material shall be added to it. Any new glass sand brought to Southold will be placed into another or second pile to begin accumulation. Once approval is given by the Department,that pile may be used for grading. If there are questions,please contact the undersigned at 516-444-0388. Sincerely, �Pmest Lampro J� Environmental Engineer I cc: Alice Hussie,Town of Southold Gregory Yakaboski,Town of Southold James Bunchuck,Town of Southold Tara Hemmer,Waste Management of New York Melissa Treers,NYSDEC,Albany David Glass,D&B file: 52S17 :.9 0 • New York State Department of Environmental Conservation AM Division of Solid & Hazardous Materials, Region One aftlow Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 _ Phone: (516) 444-0375 FAX: (516) 444-0231 John P. Cahill Commissioner June 16, 1999 The Honorable Jean W. Cochran Supervisor Town of Southold Town Hall 59095 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 Dear Supervisor Cochran: The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (Department) is in receipt of a June 9, 1999 fax of a chain of custody and the analytic data from a sample of crushed glass sand from Mr. James Bunchuck. This glass sand sample was reported to have been collected on May 11, 1999 from glass sand material at the Waste Management Brooklyn facility on Thomas Street. It is intended to use this material in the Southold Landfill as grading material. The Department has no objection to the use of this material at the Southold Landfill for grading purposes beneath the liner. If there are any questions please contact me at 516-444-0388. Sincerely,, 4e�41 ,, '.e 4, ,�W/rl;p- 't) Ernest Lampro Jr. Environmental Engineer I cc: Alice Hussie,Town of Southold Gregory Yakaboski,Town of Southold James Bunchuck,Town of Southold Melissa Treers,NYSDEC,Albany Tom Maher,D&B David Glass,D&B file: 52S17 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Solid & Hazardous Materials, Region One Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 _ Phone: (516) 444-0375 FAX: (516) 444-0231 John P. Cahill Commissioner June 4, 1999 The Honorable Jean W. Cochran Supervisor Town of Southold Town Hall 59095 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 Dear Supervisor Cochran: The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (Department) has received and reviewed the analytical results from the May 14, 1999 sampling of the glass sand material currently on the Southold landfill. Both the`old pile"and the"new pile"are acceptable for use as grading material beneath the liner of the landfill. The Department has approved in an August 12, 1998 letter,the use of Waste Management generated glass sand beneath the liner for grading of the Southold Landfill. At that time certain restrictions were placed on the acceptance and use of the material. However, the Department,at that time,did not require periodic analysis of the material. To correct this and prevent any future occurrence of the events which led to the need to perform the May 14 sampling,the Department will require a full analysis of the glass sand material for every 10,000 - 12,000 cubic yards brought to the Southold landfill. The analytical results should be reviewed by the Town of Southold and the Department prior to any of the material being brought to the landfill. If there are any questions please contact me at 516-444-0388. Sincerely, Ixnd�2 � Ernest Lampro Jr. Environmental Engineer I cc: Alice Hussie,Town of Southold Gregory Yakaboski,Town of Southold James Bunchuck,Town of Southold Melissa Treers,NYSDEC,Albany Tom Maher,D&B David Glass,D&B file: 52S17 Dvirka and 0 Bartilucci CONSULTING ENGINEERS 330 Crossways Park Drive,Woodbury, New York, 11797-2015 516-364-9890 ■ 718-460-3634 ■ Fax:516-364-9045 e-mail: db-eng@woridnet.att.net May 26, 1999 Ernest Lampro, Jr. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Solid&Hazardous Materials, Region One Building 40—SUNY Stony Brook, New York 11971 Re: Southold Landfill Glass Sand Sampling D&B No. 1314-F1 Dear Mr. Lampro: Enclosed please find the results of the analytical testing which you requested for the glass sand at the Southold Landfill. As you know two piles were sampled on May 14, 1999. Four grab samples, one from each side, were collected from the pile near the former lagoon (the "New Pile"). The grab samples were collected at a depth of approximately 3 feet from the surface of the pile. Since staining and odors were observed, as directed, a portion of one of the four grab samples was tested for volatile organic compounds (VOCs). In addition, the remainder of the grab sample tested for VOCs and the other three grab samples were composited by the laboratory and tested for metals, cyanide, semivolatile organic compounds, PCBs, pesticides and herbicides. Two grab samples were collected from the pile near the high voltage electric line tower(the"Old Pile"). The grab samples were collected at a depth of approximately 3 feet from the surface of the pile and composited by the laboratory. The composite sample was tested for metals. On the enclosed tables the results are compared to the recommended soil cleanup objectives in TAGM 4046 (Determination of Soil Cleanup Objectives and Cleanup Levels). The concentrations of zinc detected in both samples (i.e., 87 mg/kg and 61 mg/kg) slightly exceed the TAGM value of 20 mg/kg; however, this is an extremely conservative cleanup level. The semivolatile organic compound phenol was reported at a concentration of 1,500 ug/kg in the composite sample collected from the New Pile. This exceeds the cleanup level for phenol of 30 ug/kg; however, the result was qualified by the laboratory as an estimated value since it was detected below the contract required detection limit. In addition, the total concentration of semivolatile organic compounds detected in the composite sample from the New Pile is 19,870 ug/kg, which is well below the TAGM criteria of 500,000 ug/kg. A DIVISION OF WILLIAM F.COSULICH ASSOCIATES,P.C. OVIRKA AND BAATILUCCI Ernest Lampro,Jr. Page Two New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Solid&Hazardous Materials, Region One May 26, 1999 Based on our review of these results, the material is acceptable for the intended use as general fill/contour grading material to be placed below the gas venting layer and HDPE geomembrane of the landfill cap. Please contact me at your earliest convenience with your determination so that the Town can start accepting the glass sand again and complete the effort of filling in the former lagoon. If you have any questions regarding this matter or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Thomas F. Maher,PE Vice President TFM/DSGt/kd cc: Jean Cochran, Supervisor,Town of Southold James Bunchuck, Town of Southold David Glass,Dvirka and Bartilucci ♦1314/tfm99-16.1tr.(R0l) TABLE 1 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL GLASS SAND SAMPLING RESULTS METALS AND CYANIDE SAMPLE InFINITIFICATION NP-COMP QP-CQMP RECOMMENDED EASTERN DATF OF C-01 I Fr-TIQN 0511419R. 05/14/99 SOIL USA CLEANUP BACKGROUND PFRCFNT Sol IDS 0 0 Aluminum 580 370 SB 33000 Antimony U U SB — Arsenic U U 7.5 or SB 3- 12* Barium 82 26 300 or SB 15-600 Beryllium U U 0.16 or SB 0-1.75 Cadmium 0.6 U 10 or SB 0.1 -1,(10'**) Calcium 1400 1600 SB 130-35000 Chromium 3 3 50 or SB 1.5-40-,(50***) Cobalt U U 30 or SB 2.5-60 Copper 12 8 25 or SB 1 -50 Iron 750 400 2000 or SB 2000-550000 Lead 35 44 SB 200-500** Magnesium 220 400 SB 100-5000 Manganese 58 26 SB 50-5000 Mercury U U 0.1 0.001 -0.2 Nickel 6 U 13 or SB 0.5-25 Potassium U U SB 8500-43000 Selenium U U 2 or SB 0.1 -3.9 Silver U U SB — Sodium 600 310 SB 6000-8000 Thallium U U SB — Vanadium I I 1 11 150 or SB 1 -300 Zinc R7 A 1 20 or SB 9-550 • Qualifiers: Notes: U:Compound analyzed for but not detected. — : Not established. NT: Not tested for. : New York State Background. SB:Site Background. ** : Background for metropolitan or suburban areas. *** : Proposed revised criteria for cadmium and chromium in TAGM 4046 Appendix A. M: Exceeds Recommended Soil Cleanup Objective. SOUTHMETAM/mr 05126/99 TABLE 2 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL GLASS SAND SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION NP-COMP NYSDEC DATE OF COLLECTION 05/14/99 TAGM 4046 DILUTION FACTOR 5 APPENDIX A PERCENT SOLIDS 94% CRITERIA UNITS (ug/kg) (ug/kg) Dichlorodifluoromethane U ---- Chloromethane U ---- Vinyl Chloride U 200 Bromomethane U ---- Chloroethane U 1900 Trichlorofluoromethane U ---- 1,1-Dichloroethene U 400 Carbon Disulfide U 2700 lodomethane U ---- Acetone 180 200 Methylene Chloride U 100 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene U 300 1,1-Dichloroethane U 200 Vinyl Acetate U ---- 2,2-Dichloropropane U ---- cis-1,2-Dichloroethene U ---- Methyl Ethyl Ketone 260 ---- Bromochloromethane U ---- Chloroform U 300 1,1,1-Trichloroethane U 800 Carbon Tetrachloride U 600 1,1-Dichloropropene U ---- Benzene U 60 1,2-Dichloroethane U 100 Trichloroethene U 700 1,2-Dichloropropane U ---- Dibromomethane U ---- Bromodichloromethane U ---- 2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether U ---- cis-1,3-Dichloropropene U ---- 4-Methyl-2-pentanone U 1000 Toluene U 1500 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene U ---- 1,1,2-Trichloroethane U ---- Tetrachloroethene U 1400 1,3-Dichloro ro ane U 300 SOUTHVOL.WK4/mr 1 of 2 05/26/99 TABLE 2 (continued) • SOUTHOLD LANDFILL GLASS SAND SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION NP-COMP NYSDEC DATE OF COLLECTION 05/14/99 TAGM 4046 DILUTION FACTOR 5 APPENDIX A PERCENT SOLIDS 94% CRITERIA UNITS (ug/kg) (ug/kg) 2-Hexanone U Dibromochloromethane U ____ 1,2-Dibromoethane U ____ Chlorobenzene U 1700 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane U -___ Ethylbenzene U 5500 Xylene (total) U 1200 Styrene U ____ Bromoform U _--_ Isopropylbenzene U -___ Bromobenzene U _--- 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane U 600 1,2,3-Trichloropropane U 400 n-Propylbenzene U _--- 2-Chlorotoluene U ____ 4-Chlorotoluene U ____ 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene U ____ tert-Butylbenzene U ____ 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene U -___ sec-Butylbenzene U ---- 1,3-Dichlorobenzene U 1600 4-Isopropyltoluene U ---- 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 110 8500 1,2-Dichlorobenzene U 7900 n-Butylbenzene U _-__ 1.2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane U ---- 1,2,4-Tdchlorobenzene U 3400 Hexachlorobutadiene U ___ 1,2,3-Trichoorobenzene U ---- MTBE U ---- Naphthalene 59 13000 TOTAL VOCs 609 10000 Qualifiers: U: Compound analyzed for but not detected. Notes: ----: Not established SOUTWOLAM/mr 2 of 2 05/26/99 0 TABLE 3 • SOUTHOLD LANDFILL GLASS SAND SAMPLING RESULTS SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION NP-COMP NYSDEC DATE OF COLLECTION 05/14/99 TAGM 4046 DILUTION FACTOR 1 APPENDIX A PERCENT SOLIDS 94% CRITERIA UNITS (ug/kg) (ug/kg) Phenol 1500 J 30 or MDL bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether u ---- 2-Chlorophenol U 800 1,3-Dichlorobenzene U 1600 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 740 J 8500 1,2-Dichlorobenzene U 7900 2-Methylphenol U 100 or MDL 2,2'-oxybis(1-Chloropropane) U ---- 4-Methylphenol U 900 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine U ---- Hexachloroethane U ---- Nitrobenzene U 200 or MDL Isophorone 370 J 4400 2-Nitrophenol U 330 or MDL 2,4-Dimethylphenol U ---- bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane U ---- 2,4-Dichlorophenol U 400 1,2,4-Tdchlorobenzene U 3400 Naphthalene U 13000 4-Chloroaniiine U 220 or MDL Hexachlorobutadiene U ---- 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol U 240 or MDL 2-Methylnaphthalene U 36400 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene U ---- 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol U --- 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol U 100 2-Chloronaphthalene U ---- 2-Nitroaniline U 430 or MDL Dimethylphthalate U 2000 Acenaphthylene U 41000 2,6-Dinitrotoluene U 1000 3-Nitroaniline U 500 or MDL Acenaphthene U 50000 2,4-Dinitrophenol U 200 or MDL 4-Nitrophenol U 100 or MDL SOUTSEMI.WK4/mr Page 1 of 2 05/26/99 ORABLE 3 (continued) • SOUTHOLD LANDFILL GLASS SAND SAMPLING RESULTS SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION NP-COMP NYSDEC DATE OF COLLECTION 05/14/99 TAGM 4046 DILUTION FACTOR 1 APPENDIX A PERCENT SOLIDS 94% CRITERIA UNITS (ug/kg) (ug/kg) Dibenzofuran U 6200 2,4-Dinitrotoluene U ---- Diethylphthalate U 7100 Fluorene U ---- 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether U ---- 4-Nitroaniline U ---- 4,6-D initro-2-methyl phenol U ---- N-Nitrosodiphenylamine U ---- 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether U ---- Hexachlorobenzene U 410 Pentachlorophenol U 1000 or MDL Phenanthrene U 50000 Anthracene U 50000 Di-n-butylphthalate 960 J 8100 Carbazole U ---- Fluoranthene U 50000 Pyrene U 50000 Butylbenzylphthalate 10000 50000 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine U ---- Benzo(a)anthracene U 224 or MDL Chrysene U 400 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine U ---- bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 6300 50000 Di-n-octylphthalate U 50000 Benzo(b)fluoranthene U 1100 Benzo(k)fluoranthene U 1100 Benzo(a)pyrene U 61 or MDL Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene U 3200 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene U 14 or MDL Benzo(g,h,i)perylene U 50000 Qualifiers: U: Compound analyzed for but not detected. J: Result found below CRDL, value estimated. Notes: ----: Not established. 0: Value exceeds the MDL: Method Detection Limit. NYSDEC TAGM Criteria. SOUTSEMI.WKMmr Page 2 of 2 05/26/99 TABLE 4 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL GLASS SAND SAMPLING RESULTS PCBs SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION NP-COMP NYSDEC DATE OF COLLECTION 05/14/99 TAGM 4046 DILUTION 1 APPENDIX A PERCENT SOLIDS 94% CRITERIA UNITS (ug/kg) (ug/kg) Aroclor-1016 U ---- Aroclor-1221 U ---- 40 Aroclor-1232 U --- Aroclor-1242 U ---- Aroclor-1248 U ---- Aroclor-1254 U ---- Aroclor-1260 U -- TOTAL PCBs 0 10000* Qualifiers: U: Compound analyzed for but not detected. Notes: —: Not established. NA: Information not available. * : Criteria is for total PCBs in subsurface soil. • S0UPCPES.WK4/mr 05/26/99 ~ TABLE 5 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL GLASS SAND SAMPLING RESULTS PESTICIDES AND HERBICIDES SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION NP-COMP NYSDEC DATE OF COLLECTION 05/14/99 TAGM 4046 DILUTION FACTOR 1 APPENDIX A PERCENT SOLIDS 94% CRITERIA UNITS (ug/kg) (ug/kg) Pesticides Endrin Ketone U ---- alpha-BHC U 110 gamma-BHC (Lindane) U 60 Heptachlor U 100 Aldrin U 41 beta-BHC 5.6 P 200 delta-BHC U 300 Heptachlor Epoxide U 20 Endosulfan I U 900 4,4'-DDE U 2100 Dieldrin U 44 Endrin U 100 4,4'-DDD U 2900 Endosulfan II U 900 4,4'-DDT U 2100 Endrin Aldehyde U ---- Methoxychlor U ---- Endosulfan Sulfate 2.8 1000 Toxaphene U ---- alpha-Chlordane 2.5 540 gamma-Chlordane 4.1 540 Herbicides 2,4-D U 500 2,4,5-TP Silvex U 700 Qualifiers: U: Compound analyzed for but not detected. P: Concentration estimated, possibly biased low since primary and confirmation column concentrations had a %D >25%, lower value reported. Notes: ----: Not established SOUPCPES.WK4/mr 05/26/99 v hDvirka and CONSULTING Bartilucci ENGINEERS 330 Crossways Park Drive,Woodbury, New York, 11797-2015 516-364-9890 ■ 718-460-3634 n Fax:516-364-9045 e-mail: db-eng*woddnet.att.net May 11, 1999 Ernest Lampro, Jr. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Solid& Hazardous Materials, Region One Building 40—SUNY Stony Brook, New York 11971 Re: Southold Landfill Glass Sand Sampling D&B No. 1314-F2 Dear Mr. Lampro: In accordance with your request, presented below is a proposed plan for obtaining a representative sample and analyzing the glass sand presently stockpiled at the Town of Southold Landfill. The approach to sampling the stockpile is based on the guidance presented in the USEPA document, "Superfund Program Representative Sampling Guidance, Volume 4: Waste" published by the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (Interim Final Dated: December 1995). Four (4) grab samples will be collected from the stockpile. One (1) grab sample will be collected from each side (north, east, south and west) of the stockpile. The grab samples will be collected at a depth of approximately 3 feet from the surface of the pile. A shovel will be used to dig approximately 2.5 feet into the pile. A disposable plastic scoop will be used to dig the last 0.5 feet into the pile and collect the samples. The grab samples will be composited into a single representative sample at the analytical laboratory. The composite sample will be analyzed for target analyte list (metals) parameters. The laboratory used will be a laboratory that has been certified by the NYSDOH under the environmental laboratory approval program (ELAP). A laboratory turnaround time of one-week will be requested and the results will be forwarded to the NYSDEC upon receipt. The sampling will be performed as soon as we receive your approval of the procedures described above. A DIVISION OF WILLIAM F.COSULICH ASSOCIATES,P.C. OVIAKA AND BAATILUCCI Ernest Lampro,Jr. Page Two New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Solid& Hazardous Materials, Region One May 11, 1999 If you have any questions regarding this matter or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Thomas F. Maher, P.E. Vice President TFM/DSG(tp)/ld cc: Jean Cochran, Supervisor, Town of Southold Alice Hussie, Town of Southold James Bunchuck, Town of Southold David Glass, Dvirka and Bartilucci ♦1314rrFM99-14.LTR(RO1) e d1Dvirka and 0 Bartilucci CONSULTING ENGINEERS 330 Crossways Park Drive,Woodbury, New York, 11797-2015 516-3649890 • 718-460-3634 ■ Fax:516-364-9045 e-mail: db-eng0worldnet.att.net February 1, 1999 Ernest Lampro,Jr. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Solid&Hazardous Materials, Region One Building 40—SUNY Stony Brook,New York 11971 Re: Southold Landfill Filling of Former Scavenger Waste Lagoons and Scrap Metal Recovery D&B No. 1314-F2 Dear Mr.Lampro: On behalf of the Town of Southold we are writing to inform you that the Town intends to begin filling in the former scavenger waste lagoons at the landfill. The glass sand being provided to the Town by Waste Management as approved by NYSDEC will be used. The filling will be conducted in accordance with the recommendations presented in the enclosed compaction test report prepared by Tectonic Engineering Consultants (TEC). The existing (unburied) construction and demolition (C&D) material at the landfill also will be used in conjunction with the glass sand to fill the lagoons. Recommendations, prepared by TEC, for use of the C&D in filling in the lagoons will be followed. TEC's recommendations are presented in the enclosed letter dated January 22, 1999. In addition, the Town intends to begin recovering the metal scrap buried in the northwest corner of the landfill. The operation will involve excavating and screening the metal scrap. The screened scrap will be conveyed directly to containers being provided by Franza Universal of Farmingdale, New York. The containerized metal scrap will be transported off site for recycling by Franza Universal. The resulting screened soil will be used to cover the excavation at the end of each day. If you have any questions regarding this matter or require additional information,please do not hesitate to contact me. rslly yo tur ,, Thomas F.Maher,PE Vice President TFM/DSG/bl cc: Jean Cochran, Supervisor,Town of Southold Alice Hussie,Town of Southold James Bunchuck,Town of Southold David Glass, Dvirka and Bartilucci ♦1314nFM99-0l.ltr(R01) A DIVISION OF WILLIAM F.COSULICH ASSOCIATES,P.C. REGIONAL OFFICES T��® p dQ� ENGINEERING Latham,New York 518.783-1630 B I tl Auburn,Massachusetts 508.832-7146 CONSULTANTS P.C. west Chester.Ohio 513.759-9500 P.O.Box 447,615 Route 32 Fax No.914-928-9211 Highland Mills, New York 10930 914-928-6531 Mr. Thomas F. Maher, P.E. Vice President Dvirka and Bartilucci Consulting Engineers 330 Crossways Park Drive Woodbury, New York, 11797-2015 January 19, 1999 RE: W.O. #2142.04 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL CLOSURE LANDFILL COVER SYSTEM MATERIAL FIELD AND LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK Dear Mr. Maher: In accordance with our proposal dated October 23, 1998, Tectonic Engineering has performed field and laboratory testing of the glass sand material. As we understand it, the glass sand will be used as a bulk fill to raise the existing landfill waste mass grades to the final subgrade elevations of the landfill cap. The following presents our investigation, findings, and recommendations for use of the glass sand material for this purpose. 1.0 LABORATORY TESTING AND FINDINGS During our December 29, 1998 field visit, one bulk sample was obtained from the glass sand material stockpile to perform one test for grain size, moisture content and moisture-density relations. The maximum dry density (MDD) and optimum moisture content (OMC) was determined from the moisture density relations test commonly referred to as the Modified Proctor (ASTM D 1557). The tests were reported on January 6, 1999 (attached). Also attached are the results of previous testing reported on June 17 and 22, 1998, which were performed for grain size, moisture content and MDD and OMC using the Standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) method. The change in testing methodology from ASTM D 698 to ASTM D 1557 was made to: 1) obtain a MDD and OMC that is more representative of the level of compactive effort provided by modern construction equipment; and 2) provide a reference that is consistent with general landfill engineering practice at this time. CIVIL-GE-C-TECHNICAL- STRUCTURAL =';G;NE=RS NEENG TECTONIC 'SULTANTSPC Mr. Thomas F. Maher, P.E. 2 January 19, 1999 The recent material grain size gradation reported on January 6, 1999 was found to be very similar to the gradation from previous testing reported on June 17, 1998. The material is equivalent to a coarse to fine sand and is very angular to sharp. The moisture content of the recent and previous grain size tests were found to vary. This can be expected due to weather conditions, seasonal changes, length of time the material was stockpiled, and where the sample was taken from within the stockpile. In addition, during the in-place field testing, bag samples were collected to test for laboratory moisture contents to verify field moisture contents obtained by the nuclear gauge. The comparison found that the actual laboratory moisture is about 2% higher than the field moisture. As a result, field values should be adjusted upwards about 2% to obtain the actual moisture. This should be noted for adjustments during the CQA testing of construction earthwork. According to ASTM D 1557, the laboratory testing found that the glass sand has a MDD of 115.5 pcf at an OMC of 9.0%. Note that previous testing according to ASTM D 698 found a MDD of 112.0 pd at 12.0%. The difference in MDD is typical (within about 5 pcf or 5%), which reflects the higher energy level used to compact soil in the lab using the methodology of ASTM D 1557. These MDD's and OMC's are within a typical range for sand. 1.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND FINDINGS On December 29, 1998, a representative of Tectonic Engineering visited the Southold Landfill site and directed the Town's forces for the construction of a test pad to determine the compaction characteristics of the glass sand material. Two wedge shaped lifts of the material were constructed. The first was roughly 30' by 20' and ranged in thickness from about 2" to 14". The second lift was roughly 25' by 20' and, varied from 6" to over 24" in thickness. Each pad was constructed by using a front-end loader to dump glass sand piles that were shaped and compacted into lifts using arr Fiat-Alice FD30B bulldozer. The bulldozer compacted the glass sand by tracking over the material in two passes. A nuclear density gauge was then used to test the in-place density of the material in locations where the lift thickness was found to be 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, and 24 inches.- Two tests were taken in each location by rotating the nuclear gauge 180 degrees. In addition, two sets of tests were performed at different water contents for the 12" lift thickness to evaluate the compaction for a water content closer to the OMC. The June 22, 1998 standard proctor test was used to guide and evaluate whether acceptable compaction was being achieved during the field testing. The actual in-place density values obtained were then compared to both the standard proctor and modified . s � IN TECTONIC ENG�JN'SULTANGSPC. Mr. Thomas F. Maher, P.E. 3 January 19, 1999 proctor MDD as shown in the attached ""Field Testing In-Place Density Report" summary sheet. Note that the compaction values achieved in the field are calculated by dividing the measured in—place dry density by the MDD. The testing indicates that the material readily compacts using standard construction equipment, such as the bulldozer provided by the town. It also indicated that the material is capable of being compacted to the required degree even when the moisture content is low, in the adjusted (2% upwards) range of 5% to 7%, which is 20/6 to 4% below the ASTM D 1557 OMC of 9.0%. Normally, material specifications require material to be within about 2% of OMC to achieve the required compaction and increase the relative ease of material placement. The field testing shows the glass sand can achieve a minimum in-place density of about 90% relative to ASTM D 1557 for lifts in the range of 8 to 18 inches at below optimum moisture contents. In summary, the glass sand achieved an acceptable level of compaction with a reasonable level of effort. It should be noted that when working in close proximity to the glass sand material at a low moisture content, the dust from the glass was found to be an eye irritant. 3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the preceding findings, we recommend that the following criteria be followed for placement and use of the glass sand: Glass Sand as Bulk Fill Material Below Landfill Cag The following recommendations are for general use of the glass sand as a bulk fill: •• The material should have a minimum specified in-place density of 90% of the maximum dry density as determined in accordance with ASTM D 1557. • The material should be placed with a moisture content within 2% of the optimum moisture content. • The material should be placed in maximum compacted lifts of 9 inches. • The glass sand should be separated from geomembrane liners by a minimum of 6 inches of suitable soil or protective fabric to prevent puncturing as a result of contact with the sharp edges of the glass particles. • We recommend that a dust control plan be prepared that anticipates the potential need for low-level eye and respiratory protection should the dust not be ENGINEERING TECTONIC CONSULTANTS P C. Mr. Thomas F. Maher, P.E. 4 January 19, 1999 suppressed through moisture control measures. Moisture control would likely be achieved by maintaining the material within 2% of the optimum moisture content, but the criteria for implementing personnel protection should be based on field conditions at the time of construction. Glass Sand as Bulk Fill Material in Lagoons The following additional recommendations address the placement of glass sand in the lagoons only by the Town's municipal forces: • The soil should be placed in maximum compacted lifts of 9 inches. Providing the moisture content remains very close to the moisture contents found for the stockpiled material we tested, the soil can be placed with no adjustment of moisture. • The compaction effort must be greater than or equal to two tracking passes over the complete lift surface of the glass sand using equipment that exerts a ground pressure greater than or equal to the Town's Fiat-Alice FD30B bulldozer. Please call me if you have questions regarding this report. Sincerely, TECTONIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, P.C. /,7 7 Peter T. Sutherland, P.E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer Attach. PTS/c:lprojects\southold\2142.04GIassrep.doc OJECT No.2142.01 DATE: 1/6/99 GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS TECTONIC PROJECT: Southold Landfill ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS P.C. LOCATION: Southold, N.Y. i, soURCE:GIass Mat. From Waste Managemea U.S.SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 12 6 4 3 2 1.5 13,L41/23/8 3 4 6 810 1416 '0 30 40 50 70 100140 200 l00 I El 11 11 1 111111 90 1 80 P R70 C E N T 60 F N II E 50 R B Y w 40 E I I G 30 T I I �i 20 I III I I 10 I I I � 0 ! I i I 100 10 l 0.1 0.01 0.5 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND COBBLESi SILT OR CLAY coarse fine coarse I medium � fine Specimen Identification Classification MC% LL PL PI Cc Cu • BS-MCI Gy c-f GLASS, trace Silt 1 6 1.14 low I i I i i Specimen Identification D 100 D60 D30 D 10 %Gravel %Sand ! %Silt %Clay • BS-MC1 19.00 1.45 0.480 0.1400 9.0 85.5 5.5 ' I I ` OJECT No.2142.01 DATE: 1/6/99W COMPACTION TEST TECTONIC ! PROJECT: Southold Landfill ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS P.C. LOCATION: Southold, N.Y. 'i souttcE:Glass Mat. From Waste Manageme 150 I 145 I j Specimen Identification BS-MCI 140 Description of Material Gy c-f GLASS.trace Sift Test Method ASTM D1557/A 135 D R i TEST RESULTS Y D 130 Maximum Dry Density 115.5 PCF E i Optimum Water Content 9.0 °b N I T y 125 ATTERBERG LIMITS P LL PL PI p i % % % n d 120 �i CURVES OF 100% SATURATION P FOR SPECIFIC GRAVITY EQUAL TO: r2.80 115 r _ l C �' ------ 2.70 U b2.60 K\1� 110 0 U t I i I 100 -77 95 I I 90 \ 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 WATER CONTENT(Percent Dry Weight) MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP GRAIN SIZE AN fie/ PROJECT: Southold Landfill SOURCE-Glass Mat. From Waste Managemer LOCATION: Southold,11N.Y.- Rnw�urn�wr±ou�■Num■ oilnNu�nn..iiiil � imuw■imll iN11I H� �,�� I�NIIII�■ e��mu1111111 uniu�Tiinn� u�mu■im iiii IIVIIB KUMM 8 IIIIIII�� n x nxm� inm� imnn■ n iiomn�m �mu��xN�mnn� n�iomu�imu�m=mn■imnn�imnn■ lismililli NEIM �IIIIYI�■IIV IIIIIII�� i�n111 uu�j i imnu 11�■I�IIIIVINNIMI..11lfl ism 11 �IWIII�■1111 1111141 II�III Allll111�� HOME 11011111111Gy c-f GLASS,trace Silt ANN 1111�111��1�1111�1111�11�� mm FEE Specimen Identification D60 DIO %Grave* IECT No.2142.01 DATE: 6/2219 COMPACTION TEST TECl01VIC PROJECT: Southold Landfill ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS P.C. LOCATION: Southold, N.Y. souRCE:Glass Mat. From Waste Managemei 150 Fl� 145 Specimen Identification BS-4 Description of Material Gy c-f GLASS. trace Silt 140 Test Method ASTM D698/A 135 D TEST RESULTS R y D 130Maximum Dry Density 112.0 PCF I LL E Optimum Water Content 12.0 N S T ATTERBERG LIMITS y 125 P LL PL P1 o % % % U n a 120 CURVES OF 100% SATURATION s FOR SPECIFIC GRAVITY EQUAL TO: e 2.80 r 115 ---------- 2.70 C b 2.60 C F 110 0 0 t 105 100 95 I I I ( 900 5 10 15 20 25 30 WA'T'ER CONTENT(Percent Dry Wctght) MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP TECTONIC ENGINEERING P.C. DETERMINATION OF WATER (MOISTURE) CONTENT OF SOIL ASTM D4959 .................................................... TEC W.O. 214114 :.:. PROJECT: TESTED BY: .-X...-1-.- . Y _1- : .......... DATE SAMPLED. CHECKED BY::10, DATE TESTED. :: 12 ?/9€ «:..... ...; Sample I1w4 Mme' Container# Wt. of Container164 4 190 9. 27: 27. Wt. of Container+Wet Soil 347;4 339:fi 14.2 .. 1.45: <287.4 Wt. of Container+ Dry Soil 299;4 «321.7 X44 .: 139 . Z78. . Wt. of Water 8 11.9 5.2 6.3 9.4 Wt. of Dry Soil 135 236.8 121.3 111.2 187.2 Water Content 5.93% 5.03% 4.29% 5.67% 5.02% Sample I.D.1 VISUAL DESCRITPION MS-1 ND, LOC. 1/1 A BWN/GN SAND, trace gravel, trace silt MS-2 ND, LOC. 2 BWN/GN SAND,trace gravel, trace silt ...... ...... .... MS-3 BWN/GN SAND,trace gravel,trace silt .... .. .......... MS-4 ND, LOC. 3A BWN/GN SAND, trace gravel, trace silt MS-6 ND, LOC. 11 A BWN/GN SAND, trace gravel, trace silt TECTONIC ENGINEERING P.C. DETERMINATION OF WATER (MOISTURE) CONTENT OF SOIL ASTM D4959 TEC W O 2. 42104 PROJECT: Scarath .Landfiti TESTED BY Imo: DATE SAMPLED 12120 ;..:..: ...... CHECKED BY: . DATE TESTED t2101i ::... .... :: Sample I D hi( -5 MS 7! . Container# I` . Wt. of Container 27:3 28.5 ;! Wt. of Container+ Wet Soil 124:6 15.7 Wt. of Container+ Dry Soil 1 tig 129 S..:.... Wt. of Water 5.8 5.8 Wt. of Dry Soil 91.5 101.4 Water Content 6.34% 5.72%1 1 Sample I.D. VISUAL DESCRITPION MS-5 ND, LOC. 6 BWN/GN SAND, trace gravel, trace silt MS-7 ND, LOC. 14 A BWN/GN SAND, trace gravel, trace silt SOUTHOLD LANDFILL W.O.#2142.04 FIELD TESTING IN-PLACE DENSITY REPORT Sample ID MDD OMC Prepared by: PTS BS-4 112.0 12.0% Date: 1/11/99 BS-MC1 115.5 9.0% Adjusted BS-4 BS-MCI Depth Field Field Adjusted %MOD %MOD Test Lift Source Soil Moisture') Moisture Test Test Standard Modified No Lift# Depth Rod ID pcf % (pcf) DO(pcf) DD(pcf) Proctor Proctor 1 1 10 8 BS-4/BS-MCI 2.9 2.7% 4.9 107.0 105.0 93.7% 90.9% 1A 1 10 8 BS-4/BS-MC1 2.9 2.8% 4.9 105.4 103.4 92.3% 89.5% 2 1 10 8 BS-4/BS-MC1 3.7 3.5% 5.7 106.8 104.8 93.6% 90.7% 2A 1 10 8 BS-4/BS-MC1 3.7 3.4% 5.7 108.3 106.3 94.9% 92.0% 3 1 8 6 BS-4BS-MC1 3.7 3.5% 5.7 104.5 102.5 91.5% 88.8% 3A 1 8 6 BS-4/BS-MC1 2.6 2.4% 4.6 106.6 104.6 93.4% 90.5% 4 1 8 6 BS-4/BS-MCI 4.2 3.9% 6.2 106.6 104.6 93.4% 90.6% 4A 1 8 6 BS-4/BS-MCI 3.4 32% 5.4 105.8 103.8 92.7% 89.9% 5 1 6 3 BS-41BS-MC1 3.4 32% 5.4 106.3 104.3 93.1% 90.3% 5A 1 6 3 BS-4/BS-MCI 4.0 3.8% 6.0 105.5 103.5 92.4% 89.6% 6 1 6 3 BS-4/BS-MC1 5.3 5.1% 7.3 103.3 101.4 90.5% 87.8% 6A 1 6 3 BS-4/BS-MCI 4.2 4.0% 6.2 104.7 102.7 91.7% 88.9% 7 1 12 10 BS-4/BS-MC1 4.0 3.8% 6.0 105.9 103.9 92.8% 90.0% 7A 1 12 10 BS-4/BS-MCI 2.9 2.7% 4.9 107.3 105.3 94.0% 91.1% 8 1 12 10 BS-4/BS-MC1 3.7 3.4% 5.7 107.7 105.7 94.3% 91.5% 8A 1 12 10 BS-4BS-MC1 4.5 4.2% 6.5 107.8 105.8 94.4% 91.6% 9 2 14 12 BS-4/BS-MCI 9.0 8.5% 11.0 106.1 104.2 93.0% 90.2% 9A 2 14 12 BS-4BS-MC1 8.7 8.1% 10.7 108.0 106.0 94.7% 91.8% 10 2 12 12 BS-4/BS-MCI 4.8 4.3% 6.8 111.8 109.7 98.0% 95.0% 10A 2 12 12 BS-4/BS-MCI 6.1 5.5% 8.1 111.6 109.5 97.8% 94.8% 11 2 18 12 BS-4/BS-MCI 3.2 2.9% 5.2 109.3 107.2 95.7% 92.8% 11A 2 18 12 BS-4/BS-MC1 2.9 2.7% 4.9 107.0 105.0 93.7% 90.9% 12 2 18 12 BS-4/BS-MCI 3.4 3.1% 5.4 111.0 108.9 97.2% 94.3% 12A 2 18 12 BS-4/BS-MCI 3.7 3.4% 5.7 109.0 106.9 95.5% 92.6% 13 2 24 12 BS-4/BS-MCI 5.8 5.4% 7.8 107.3 105.3 94.0% 91.2% 13A 2 24, 12 BS-4/BS-MCI 4.2 4.0% 6.2 105.7 103.7 92.6% 89.8% 14 2 24 12 BS-4/BS-MCI 5.0 4.8% 7.0 103.5 101.6 90.7% 87.9% 14A 2 24 12 BS-4/BS-MC1 5.6 5.4% 7.6 104.1 102.2 91.2% 88.5% Note:(1)Field moisture contents should be adjusted upwards approximately 2%to obtain true moisture contents. REGIONAL OFFICES ^' '+ �► Latham,New York 518-783-1630 ENGINEERING l` Auburn,Massachusetts 508.832-7146 CONSULTANTS PC. west Chester,Ohio 513.759-9500 P.O.Box 447,615 Route 32 Fax No.914-928-9211 Highland Mills, New York 10930 914-928-6531 Dvirka and Bartilucci Consulting Engineers 330 Crossways Park Drive Woodbury, New York, 11797-2015 Attention: Mr. Thomas F. Maher, P.E. January 22, 1999 RE: W.O. #2142.04 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL CLOSURE CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS LAGOON FILL SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK Dear Mr. Maher: As requested, Tectonic Engineering has reviewed in concept the proposed use of residential construction and demolition debris (C&D) as bulk fill for the landfill lagoon. The lagoon is located in the northwest comer of the landfill along the landfill "footprint" edge. The lagoon is about 400 feet long, an average of about 120 feet wide, and about 25 feet deep. The use of the C&D for lagoon fill is based on the following technical assumptions: 1. The C&D is of a mixed character, i.e., composed of various materials resulting from residential yard work, earthwork, and building demolition and construction. 2. The total volume of C&D stockpiled on site is about 1,000 CY. 3. Based on our review of the preliminary grading plans for the Southold Landfill closure provided to our office by Dvirka and Bartilucci, the proposed maximum fill over the top of the lagoon surface is about 10 feet. The recommendations for use of the C&D in the lagoon are as follows: • The material should be mixed before being placed to the greatest degree practicable. • The C&D should be placed in 8-inch compacted lifts. • Compaction of each lift should be performed with at least four passes over the complete lift surface using the Town's Fiat-Alice FD30B bulldozer or compaction equipment with an equivalent or greater ground pressure. CIVIL-GEOTECHNICAL-STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS . s � -r• r i+. - y ENG+NEEPING � C%S;L-;NTS Mr. Thomas F. Maher, P.E. 2 January 22, 1999 • The C&D should be placed in alternating lifts with the glass sand or other acceptable bulk fill material. As discussed in our letter dated January 19, 1999, the glass sand should be placed in compacted lifts of 9 inches and compaction of the glass sand should be performed with at least two passes of the bulldozer. • No significant quantities of materials that create hydrogen sulfide, such as gypsum board, should be landfilled. • The C&D should only be deposited at an elevation that is at least 5 feet above the seasonal high groundwater level. In summary, if the above assumptions and recommendations are followed, the C&D should be acceptable for use as fill in the lagoons. Please call me if you have questions. Sincerely, TECTONIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, P.C. /ZZ, Peter T. Sutherland, P.E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer PTS/cAprojects\.southold\2142.04 C&D rep.doc JUN- 15-99 11 07 FROM- 0 ID- 48675 PACF. 1/3 PRIVILEGE AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The information .in this fax is intended for the named recipients only. It may contain privilig,W and confidential matter. If you have received this-fax in error,please notify virka us. immediat �+ OY a collect telephone' Gall to (816 and 384-E�A0 a return the original to the render.0 mai( We will relrr Wmo you for po$tape. Do not diseidss the Bartiluml 0011460 to-drtyorim. Thank you. d[b cOWLTING ENaINIEERS 330 Crossways Park Drive,Woodptny,Now York, 11797.201.6 618.364-9890 a Fax:316.38¢9W D&B FAX NO: (516) 364-9045 DATE: 1 COMPANY NAME ATTENTION: J11, " FAX NO.: 7%"��-,-74057b FROM: --� SUBJECT: ��J�-�- .: JOBS: NO. OF PAGES: (including cover sheet) MESSAGE: �- THANK YOU; A DIVISION OF WILLIAM F.COWLICN A6800IATES,P.C. JUN- 15-99 11 :09 FROM- 1D: 0649675 PAGE 2/3 -DRAFT- [Town of Southold Letterhead] - Date - Robert Boorum Waste Management of New York, Inc, - - - 75 Thomas Street Brooklyn,New York 11222 Re: Class Sand Town of Southold Landfill Dear Mr. Boorum: I am forwarding the enclosed letter from the New York State Department of Environmental. Conservation (NYSDEC) for.your information. As you can sec, the letter, requires chemical analysis of every 10,000 to 12;000 cubic-yards-.of the glass sand RE&to.delivery to the Southold Landfill. As a result; I am requesting that you provide us with the results of chemical analysis of each 10,000cubic yards of glass°sand that you intendto deliver to the landfill: Toallow for Town review;please submit the results to this:office at least one week prior to initiating delivery.of the material that each sample was collected from. Each sample should be:analyzed for.the full target: compound list and target.analyte list parameters and cyanide. If you have any questions please contact me at(51.6) 734-7685. Sincerely, James Bunchuck Solid Waste Coordinator JB/DSGt/ld cc: Supervisor Cochran T. Maher(D&B) D. Glass (D&B) •1114/M1sc99-011TR(Ra) JUN-IS-SS 11 : 09 FROM: ID: s964867S PACE 3/3 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Solid & Hazardous Materiels, Flegion One Building 40 . SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Rhone: (616) 444-0376 FAX: (616) 444.0231 PCON11 Commissioner June 4, 1999 The Honorable Jean W. Cochran Supervisor Town of Southold Town Hail 59095 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 Dear Supervisor Cochran: The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (Department) has received and reviewed the analytical results from the May 14, 1999 sampling of the-glass sand material currently on the Southold landfill. Both the"old pile"and the"new pile"are acceptable for use as grading material beneath the liner of the landfill. The Department has approved in an August 12,.1998.letter,the use of Waste Management generated glass sand beneath the liner for grading of the Southold.Landfill. At that time certain restrictions were placed on-the acceptance 404 use of the material. Howeverjhe Department;at that tinw,did not require periodic asariysis of the material, To correct this and prevent any future occuftnoe of the events which lod to the treed to perfoim the May 14 sampling;the Department will require a,full.imaiysis of the'Slass$anti material for eVery.10,000- 12;000 cubic yards brought to the Southold landfill. The analytical results should be reviewed by the Town of Southold and the Department prior to any of the.material being brought to the landfill. If there are any questions please contact meat 516-444-0388. Sincerely, Ernest Lampro Jr. Environmental Engineer I ce: Alice Hussie,Town of Southold Gregory Yakaboski;Town of Southold James Bunahuok,Town of Southold Melissa Treers,NYSAEC,Albany •-' Tom Maher,D&B David Glass;D&B file: 52S17 7 MAY-11-99 00: 50 FROM: 1130 3649045 PAGE 1,'3 PRIVILEGE AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The information in this fax is intended for the named recipients only. It may contain privileged and confidential matter. If you have received this fax In error, please notify Dvirka us immediately by a collect telephone call to (516) and 364-9890 and return the original to the sender by mail. 0 Bartilucci I will reimburse you for postage. Do not disclose the contents to anyone. Thank-you. d1bCONSULTING ENGINEERS 330 Crossways Park Drive,Woodbury, New York, 11797-2015 516-364-9690 9 Fax:516-364-9045 D&B FAX NO: (516) 364-9045 DATE: ' AVT 40 44' COMPANY NAME . 40'1 ATTENTION: V JIM FAX NO.: FROM: I�l�-lIG alb SUBJECT: f JOB#: NO. OF PAGES: (including cover sheet) MESSAGE: Ve, VI GRIP ,� THANK YOU: G A DIVISION OF WILLIAM F.COSULICH ASSOCIATES,P.C. MAY-11-99 09: 51 FROM: I0- 0649045 PAGE 2%3 -DRAFT- May 10, 1999 " Ernest Lampro, Jr. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Solid &Hazardous Materials, Region One Building 40—SUNY Stony Brook, New York 11971 Re: Southold Landfill Glass Sand Sampling D&B No. 1314-172 Dear Mr. Lampro: In accordance with your request, presented below is a proposed plan for obtaining a " representative sample and analyzing the glass sand presently stockpiled at the Town of Southold Landfill. The approach to sampling the stockpile is based on the guidance presented in the USEPA document, "Superfund Program Representative Sampling Guidance, Volume 4: Waste" published by the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (Interim Final Dated: December 1995). Four(4) grab samples will be collected from the stockpile. One (1) grab sample will be collected from each side (north, east, south and west) of the stockpile. The grab samples will be collected at a depth of approximately 3 feet from the surface of the pile. A shovel will be used to dig approximately 2.5 feet into the pile. A disposable plastic scoop will be used to dig the last 0.5 feet into the pile and collect the samples. The grab samples will be composited into a single representative sample at the analytical laboratory. The composite sample will be analyzed for target analyte list (metals) parameters. The laboratory used will be a laboratory that has been certified by the NYSDOH under the environmental laboratory approval program (ELAP). A laboratory turnaround time of one-week will be requested and the results will be forwarded to the NYSDEC upon receipt. The sampling will be performed as soon as we receive your approval of the procedures described above. Or MAY-11-99 08: 52 FROM: 0 ID: 0649045 PAGE 3/3 Ernest Lampro, Jr. Page Two New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Solid & Hazardous Materials, Region One May 11, 1999 If you have any questions regarding this matter or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, ry Thomas F. Maher, P.E. Vice President TFM/DSG(tp)/ld cc: Jean Cochran, Supervisor, Town of Southold Alice Hussie, Town of Southold James Bunchuck,Town of Southold David Glass, Dvirka and Bartilucci ♦1314/TFM99-14.LTR(R01) tr, fr: �r MAY-27-99 15 : 39 FROM: • IDTS18364S PACE 1/9 r Post-it' FaX NUIe 1 �'''� c,, payis► To DvirkadI � °� ra��-�.' and /�^ �,e� �i / p� bOONSULTING Bartilucc� Fa:a FaxR ENGINEERS 330 Crossways Park Drive,Woodbury,New York,11797.2015 516-364-9690 • 718-460-3634 ■ Fax:516-364-9045 e-mail: &-eng0wortdnet a t.net May 26, 1999 Ernest Lampro,Jr. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Solid& Hazardous Materials,Region One Building 40—SUNY Stony Brook,New York 11971 Re: Southold Landfill Glass Sand Sampling D&B No. 1314-F1 Dear Mr. Lampro: Enclosed please find the results of the analytical testing which you requested for the glass sand at the Southold Landfill. As you know two piles were sampled on May 14, 1999. Four grab samples, one from each side, were collected from the pile near the former lagoon (the "New Pile"). The grab samples were collected at a depth of approximately 3 feet from the surface of the pile. Since staining and odors were observed, as directed, a portion of one of the four grab samples was tested for volatile organic compounds(VOCs). In addition,the remainder of the grab sample tested for VOCs and the other three grab samples were composited by the laboratory and tested for metals, cyanide, semivolatile organic compounds, PCBs,pesticides and herbicides. Two grab samples were collected from the pile near the high voltage electric line tower(the"OId Pile"). The grab samples were collected at a depth of approximately 3 feet from the surface of the pile and composited by the laboratory. The composite sample was tested for metals. On the enclosed tables the results are compared to the recommended soil cleanup objectives in TAGM 4046 (Determination of Soil Cleanup Objectives and Cleanup Levels). The concentrations of zinc detected in both samples(i.e., 87 mg/kg and 61 mg/kg)slightly exceed the TAGM value of 20 mg/kg; however, this is an extremely conservative cleanup level. The semivolatile organic compound phenol was reported at a concentration of 1,500 ug/kg in the composite sample collected from the New Pile. This exceeds the cleanup level for phenol of 30 ug/kg; however, the result was qualified by the laboratory as an estimated value since it was detected below the contract required detection limit. In addition, the total concentration of semivolatile organic compounds detected in the composite sample from the New Pile is 19,870 ug/kg,which is well below the TAGM criteria of 500,000 ug/kg. A DIVISION OF WILLIAM F.COSULICH ASSOCIATES.P.C. MAY-27-99 IS :40 FROM: ID: S163804S PAGE 2/9 OVIRKA ANO BARTILUCCI Ernest Lampro,Jr. Page Two New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Solid&Hazardous Materials, Region One May 26, 1999 Based on our review of these results, the material is acceptable for the intended use as general fill/contour grading material to be placed below the gas venting layer and HDPE geomembrane of the landfill cap. Please contact me at your earliest convenience with your determination so that the Town can start accepting the glass sand again and complete the effort of filling in the former lagoon. If you have any questions regarding this matter or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Thomas F.Maher,PE Vice President TFFM/DSGt/kd cc: Jean Cochran,Supervisor,Town of Southold James Bunchuck,Town of Southold David Glass,Dvirka and Bartilucci ♦1314/efM"-16JV-Qt01) TABLE 1 a SOUTHOLD LANDFILL � GLASS SAND SAMPLING RESULTS METALS AND CYANIDE co RECOMMENDED EASTERN m SOIL USA N CLEANUP BACKGROUND PERCENT sc)t-ins e UNIMA a n Alurrinum 580 370 $B 33000 a Antimony U U Se -- Arsenic U U 7.5 or SB 3- 121 Barium 82 26 300 or S8 15-600 BeryMum U U 0.16 or S8 0- 1.75 Cadmium 0.6 U 10 or SB 0.1 - 1,(10"') Calclum 1400 1600 S8 130-35000 Chromium 3 3 50 or SB 1.5-40-,(50... Cobalt U U 30 or SB 2.5-60 Copper 12 8 25 or 88 1 -50 Iron 750 400 2000 or SS 2000-550000 Lead 35 44 SB 200-500" Magnesium 220 400 SB 100-5000 Manganese 5s 26 SB 50-5000 Mercury U U 0.1 0.001 -0.2 Nickel 6 U 13 or SB 0.5-25 Potassium U U SB 8500-43000 Selenium U U 2 or 88 0.1 -3.9 Siver U U so -- o Sodium 600 310 SB 6000-8000 Thaftm U U as -- Vanadium 150 or 88 1 -300 W Zinc 20 or SB 9-50 A Qualil lers: Notes. N U:Compound analyzed for but not detected. --- : Not established. NT:Not tested for. :New York State Background. SS.Site Background. :Background for metropolitan or suburban areas. Proposed revised criteria for ca"urn and chromium In TAGM 4046 Appendix A. El:Exceeds Recommended Soil Cleanup Objective. T b Rl SOUTHMEr.W-WOW 0x26199 W f0 MAY-27-99 15 :40 FROM: ID: 516345 PACE 4/9 TABLE 2 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL GLASS SAND SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION NP-COMP NYSDEC DATE OF COLLECTION 05/14/99 TAGM 4046 DILUTION FACTOR 5 APPENDIX A PERCENT SOLIDS 94% CRITERIA UNITS (Ug/k /k Dichlorodifluoromethane U ---- Chloromethane U ---- Vinyl Chloride U 200 Bromomethane U Chloroethane U 1900 Trichlorofluoromethane U -- 1,1-Dichloroethene U 400 Carbon Disulfide U 2700 lodomethane U — Acetone 180 200 Methylene Chloride U 100 trans-1,2-Dichioroethene U 300 1,1-Dichloroethane U 200 Vinyl Acetate U 2,2-Dichioropropane U cis-1,2-Dichloroethene U -- Methyl Ethyl Ketone 260 — Bromochloromethane U — Chloroform U 300 1,1,1-Trichloroethane U 800 Carbon Tetrachloride U 600 1,1-Dichloropropene U — Benzene U 60 1,2-Dichloroethane U 100 Trichloroethene U 700 1,2-Dichioropropane U — Dibromomethane U --- Bromodichloromethane U — 2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether U --- cis-1,3-Dichloropropene U — 4-Methyl-2-perdanone U 1000 Toluene U 1500 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene U — 1,1,2-Trichloroethane U -- Tetrachloroethene U 1400 1,3-Dichioro roane U 1 300 $0VTKV0LWK4/mr 1 of 2 0&2" MAY-27-99 15:41 FROM: • ID: 516345 PACE 5/9 TABLE 2(continued) SOUTHOLD LANDFILL GLASS SAND SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION NP-COMP NYSDEC DATE OF COLLECTION 05/14/99 TAGM 4046 DILUTION FACTOR 5 APPENDIX A PERCENT SOLIDS 94% CRITERIA UNITS u lk u 2-Hexanone U -— Dibromochloromethane U -- 1,2-Dibromoethane U ---- Chlorobenzene U 1700 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane U -- Ethyibenzene U 5500 Xylene (total) U 1200 Styrene U — Bromoform U --- lsopropylbenzene U ---- Bromobenzene U ---- 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane U 600 1,2,3-Tdchloropropane U 400 n-Propylbenzene U — 2-Chlorotoluene U --- 4-Chlorotoluene U ---- 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene U — tert-Butylbenzene U ---- 1,2,4-Tdmethylbenzene U ---- sec-Butylbenzene U --- 1,3-Dichlorobenzene U 1600 4-Isopropyltoluene U — 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 110 8500 1,2-Dichlorobenzene U 7900 n-Butylbenzene U — 1.2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane U — 1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene U 3400 Hexachiorobutadiene U ---- 1,2,3-Tdchlorobenzene U — MTBE U — Naphthaiene 59 13000 TOTAL VOCs 609 10000 Qualifiers: U: Compound analyzed for but not detected- Notes- Not etected_Notes-Not established SOU WOL.WKahra 2 of 2 05(2m MAY-27-99 15:41 FROM: ID: 516�04S PAGE 6/9 TABLE 3 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL GLASS SAND SAMPLING RESULTS SEMNOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION NP-CO NYSDEC DATe OF COLLECTION 05114]W— TAGM 4046 DILUTION-FACTOR1 APPENDIX A PERC NTS L CRITERIA UNI (uglkg) (u g) Phenol 500 J 30 or MDL bis(2-Chioroethyi)ether 2-Chlorophenol U 800 1,3-Dichlorobenzene U 1600 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 740 J 8500 1,2-Dichlorobenzene U 7900 2-Methylphenol U 100 or MDL 2,2'-oxybis(1-Chloropropane) U ---- 4-Methylphenol U 900 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine U ---- Hexachioroethane U --- Nitrobenzene U 200 or MDL Isophorone 370 J 4400 2-Nitrophenol U 330 or MDL 2,4-Dimethylphenol U bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane U -- 2,4-Dichlorophenol U 400 1,2,4-Tdchlorobenzene U 3400 Naphthalene U 13000 4-Chloroaniline U 220 or MDL Hexachlorobutadlene U -- 4-Chloro-3-methyiphenol U 240 or MOL 2-Methylnaphthalene U 36400 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene U --- 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol U --- 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol U 100 2-Chloronaphthalene U ---- 2-Nitroanillne U 430 or MDL Dimethylphthalate U 2000 Acenaphthylene U 41000 2,6-Dinitrotoluene U 1000 3-Nitroaniline U 500 or MDL Acenaphthene U 50000 2,4-Dinitrophenol U 200 or MDL 4-Nitrophenol U 100 or MDL SOUTSEMINK41mr Paye 1 of 2 O"26M I D= 51636045 PAGE 7/9 MAY-27-99 15 42 FROM: TABLE 3 (continued) SOUTHOLD LANDFILL GLASS SAND SAMPLING RESULTS SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS SA PL ID NTIFIGATION NP-COMP NYSDEC D TE OFC LLE 05/14/99 TAGM 4046 DL� I AC OR 1 APPENDIX A CENT OLID 94/o CRITERIA U I S (ugh ( U8200) Dibenzofuran U _. 2,4-Dinitrotoluene U 7100 Diethylphthalate U Fluorene U 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether U r� 4-Nitroaniline U 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol U N-Nitrosodiphenylamine U 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether U 410 Hexachlorobenzene U 1000 or MDL Pentachlorophenol U 50000 Phenanthrene U 50000 Anthracene 960 J 8100 Di-n-butylphthalate U Carbazole U 50000 Fluoranthene U 50000 Pyrene 10000 50000 Butylbenzylphthalate U ---- 3,V-Dichlorobenzidine U 224 or MDL Benzo(a)anthracene U 400 Chrysene U 313'-Dichlorobenzidine 6300 50009 bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthaiate 50000 Di-n-octylphthalate U U 1100 Senzo(b)fluoranthene U 1100 Benzo(k)fluoranthene U 61 or MDL Benzo(a)pyrene U 3200 indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene u14 or MDL Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene U 50000 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Qualifiers: U: Compound analyzed for but not detected. J: Result found below CRDL, value estimated. Notes: Value exceeds the Not established. NYSDEC TAGM Criteria. MDL: Method Detection Limit. o page 2 of 2 S0U7SEMI.WK41mr TABLE 4 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL K GLASS SAND SAMPLING RESULTS N PCBs . m SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION NP-COMP NYSDEC DATE OF COLLECTION 05/14/99 TAGM 4046 DILUTION 1 APPENDIX A PERCENT SOLIDS 94% CRITERIA a° UNITS (U91k9) (ug/kg Aroclor-1016 U ---- Aroclor-1221 U ---- Aroclor-1232 U ---- Arodor--1242 U ---- Aroclor-1248 U ---- Aroclor-1254 U ---- Aroclor-1260 U --- TOTAL PCSs 0 J. 10000" Qualifiers: U: Compound analyzed for but not detected. Notes: ----: Not established. NA: Information not available. Criteria is for total PCBs in subsurface som. A N 'fl b C'1 M S0VPCPE8.WK4Jrnr asam m to MAY-27-99 15 :43 FROM: ID: 5163145 PACE 9/9 TABLE 5 SOUTHOLD LANDFILL GLASS SAND SAMPLING RESULTS PESTICIDES AND HERBICIDES SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION NP-COMP NYSDEC DATE OF COLLECTION 05/14/99 TAGM 4046 DILUTION FACTOR 1 APPENDIX A PERCENT SOLIDS 94% CRITERIA UNITS k u Pesticides Endrin Ketone U alpha-BHC U 110 gamma-BHC (Lindane) U 60 Heptachlor U 100 Aldrin U 41 beta-BHC 5.6 P 200 delta-BHC U 300 Heptachlor Epoxide U 20 Endosulfan I U 900 4,4'-DDE U 2100 Dieldrin U 44 Endrin U 100 4,4'-DDD U 2900 Endosulfan II U 900 4,4'-DDT U 2100 Endrin Aldehyde U — Methoxychlor U Endosulfan Sulfate 2.8 1000 Toxaphene U alpha-Chlordane 2.5 540 gamma-Chlordane 4.1 540 Herbici e� 2,4-D U 500 2,4,5-TP Silvex U 700 Qualifiers: U: Compound analyzed for but not detected. P: Concentration estimated, possibly biased low since primary and confirmation column concentrations had a %D >25%, lower value reported. Notes: Not established S0UPCPES.WK41mr 05/26/99 s WASTE MANAGEMENT 123 Varick Avenue Brooklyn,NY 11237 (718)533-5308 (718)533-5170 Fax August 25, 1999 Mr. James Bunchuck Solid Waste Coordinator Town of Southold Solid Waste District P.O. Box 962 Cutchogue,NY 11935 Re: Southold Landfill — Acceptance of Glass Sand from Waste Management's 485 Scott Avenue, Brooklyn,NY facility Dear Mr. Bunc tx WM received your letter dated August 18, 1999 regarding the Acceptance of Glass Sand at the Town of Southold Landfill and the proposed protocol for stockpiling and sampling the material prior to using it at the landfill. WM has reviewed the protocol and accepts the protocol as described in the letter. The following additions should be made: 1. The Town of Southold will send the samples for analysis to Waste Management's contracted laboratory via Federal Express or other overnight mail service: Willie Urbiztondo Vice President, Sales Accredited Laboratories, Inc. 20 Pershing Avenue Carteret,NJ 07008 (732) 541-2025 2. The results of the sample analysis will be seat by Accredited Laboratories to Stan. Fernandez of Waste Management. Stan Fernandez will review the results and share the results with the Town of Southold (Jim Bunchuck) and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (Ernie Lampros). 3. Waste Management will pay for the sample analysis. Waste Management looks forward to delivering glass sand to the Town of Southold. Please call me with any additional questions at (718) 533-5308 and to schedule the commencement of deliveries. Page 2-Letter to James ithuck ' August 25, 1999 Very Truly Yours, Waste anagement of New York, LLC araJ. e mer Divisi ngineer cc: Bob Boorum, Waste Management Stan Fernandez, Waste Management Charles Gusmano, Waste Management 0 �S FFO( �0 G JAMES BUNCHUCK P.O. Box 962 CZ SOLID WASTE COORDINATOR Cutchogue, New York 11935 p Tel: (516) 734-7685 41 �aOl� Fax: (516) 734-7976 SOUTHOLD TOWN August 18, 1999 SOLID WASTE. DISTRICT Tara Hemmer Waste Management of New York 123 Varick St. Brooklyn, NY 11222 Re: Southold Landfill Acceptance of Glass Sand Dear Ms. Hemmer: Following up on our recent discussions, presented below is a proposed protocol for stockpiling and sampling the glass sand prior to using it at the landfill. The protocol is intended to meet the Department's requirements for monitoring the chemical characteristics of the glass sand received at the landfill. 1. Glass sand delivered to the landfill will be placed in a dedicated stockpile. 2. When approximately 5,000 cubic yards have been stockpiled, a representative sample of the stockpile will be collected and sampled. 3. Four (4) grab samples will be collected from the stockpile. One (1) grab sample will be collected from each side (north, east, south and west) of the stockpile. The grab samples will be collected at a depth of approximately 3 feet from the surface of the pile. A shovel will be used to dig approximately 2.5 feet into the pile at each grab sample location. A disposable plastic scoop will be used to dig the last 0.5 feet into the pile and collect the samples. 4. The grab samples will be composited into a single representative sample at the analytical laboratory. A portion of one grab sample will be analyzed for target compound list(TCL)volatile organic compounds(VOCs). The composite sample will be analyzed for TCL semivolatile organic compounds, pesticides and PCBs and target analyte list (TAL) metals and cyanide. The laboratory used will be a laboratory that has been certified by the NYSDOH under the environmental laboratory approval program (ELAP). A laboratory turn-around time of one-week will be requested and the results will be forwarded to the NYSDEC upon receipt. Tara Hemmer Glass Sand Sampling Protocol August 18, 1999 p. 2 5. Beginning on the date that the stockpile is sampled no additional material will be added to the stockpile. Incoming deliveries of glass sand will be placed in a new stockpile. 6. Upon receipt of approval from NYSDEC, the stockpile which has been sampled and tested will be used for backfilling the former lagoons and/or general contour grading. 7. The procedure described above will be repeated for each 5,000 cubic yards. 8. If at any time the NYSDEC finds the results of the analyses to be unacceptable, Waste Management will remove the stockpiled glass sand from the landfill. Within 5 business days of notification from NYSDEC, Waste Management will submit a letter to NYSDEC, with a copy to the Town, identifying the proposed procedures to be used for removal of the glass sand from the landfill and transport and disposal. Waste Management shall remove the stockpiled glass sand from the landfill within 10 business days of the date of approval from NYSDEC. All work required to remove rejected glass sand from the landfill shall be the responsibility of Waste Management. Please contact me as soon as you have reviewed and approved the above or if you have any questions, so that we may begin to accept the glass sand at the landfill again and continue our contour grading work in support of closure efforts. Very truly yours, ames Bunchuck Solid Waste Coordinator cc: Supervisor Cochran Greg Yakaboski Ernie Lampro,NYSDEC Bob Boorum, Waste Mgmt. T. Maher, D&B D. Glass, D&B 05%19%941 08:57 FAX 183152 WASTE MCMT 0 C7 o %*Ira WASTE MANAGEMENTC c - 101 Varick Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11237 718. 61~'3 51 v(0 FA" COVER SHEET THIS INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FAXS{MILE AND THE DOCUMENTS ACCOMPANYING THE FACSIMILE CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM WASTE MANAGEMENT WHICH IS CONFIDC•NTIAL ANLVOR LEOALLY PRIVILEGED. THE INFORMATION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED IN THE TRANSMITTAL SHM,IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT.OR THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE TO DELIVER IT TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIFI)TIIAT ANY DISCLOSURE,COPYING, DISTRIBUTION. DISSEMINATION OR THE TAKING OF ANY ACTION IN KL.'LIANC'L• UPON THE CONTENTS OF THIS FACSIMILE ARE STRICTLY PROHIBITED: AND THE DOCUMENT SHOULD BE RETURNED TO OUR FIRM IMMEDIATELY. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS FACIMILE IN ERROK, PLEASE NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONING IMMEDIATELY SO THAT WE CAN ARRANGE FOR THE RETURN OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS AT NO COST TO YOU. DATE: �� • �� TO: S1 PA2VN CC COMPANY: S0VS N0L-Q 1•ftWO TITLE: TELEPHONE: FAX#: (S I�o ��'� FROM: Smkw Feet-/*wims PAGE ,—OF--L5 MESSAGE: A0 A 164 V10%,ve tN G o • oro 0.. ' rJ h' '1 71 f l • • � • t,i. JT llfi:,17 11.41; 19 1 i!1 nil- TN - r � ItCS T•1�'Crii.�t��-i'1'1S`i�ti zf�l "7:'4�!1 i'(,f_ �L/ � �. � i � 'moi 7��} I..t 1 i I., i T i•, t I T.-..�.,.�,{{t�+t 1 1 n y��11'N.I�rk � �.... i � (t i .' i, tt. j'- e r Jt .L.J.. ,f ..:r' _i1_:-i_,<�L_.1.tlu__ •I, WAIII ■■MEW i'� �_ , M■NNEN ■■■■� ■■■ � ' MOM �■■® -- . ANN■r ■■■■■ Alp��*1 i4!��1 �'��l+��st�l�'t�ju�lr �T�'�� i � • 1 . j ".�•:!-.t �. r y 1 . I lima " .. .h�.i:iJ L'r��, '(1:i�i.<i ,'U I�.1!rf,.l� 11 i.i ..'..�- I .i. Il?TI- r f , .-r, i •ri ,1 �r`�� t Q T 1 1�, � �� • �. CL*p I CLP 11 ,*_ .�' Ll:u L�,`f`../r�.yl .41(� ri I,�f.r�t�i T.1-{IIW�11`} •+ l! - I ..rgiTYY��r-.L1 L'I1,1..' .t�" a� S!•� h t 1-: i � y Try ]de]di.�iLt-L.�.,��4�a�1�:1T(1:17. .�_1.�7fi_ �,ll � r!��.111 ,S ,.�Y��f li�1. ��..5� •�.... 0•- MIN ■ � • 't • • - t c �„�� 05/19/99 08:57 FAX ftl83152 WASTE MGMT Oft Zo3 05/19/08 15:25 FAX 1 732WI 1333 ACCREDITED L.ASORATOW" 004 ACCREDITED LABORATORIES, INC . TCLP VOLATILES ANALYSIS DATA CASE HUMBER 4261 MRTkIX Lsach�4� �i SAMPLE NUMBER i, 99IQ4772 DILUTION FACTOR 10 DATA FILE :42491 OATE EXTRACTED CLIENT NAME ,. 1KLuI i DATE ANALYZED 4 14 99 FIELD ID CGS ANALYZED BY a0 erias��s�z�ao�cwws.P.s cR�sYa•sec.s=�=y11CQaf•MY�Wtri=xmx=�=ss.-�T.i»ii�Si��r��1�s19iCC73 RFyulatory WILLIAM - LAS No . Compound Insult 11DL Level a�'xc�aeisa�S�If1�Ysooc�s�aysc�sascnxl�tms��c��1�A�lax�xs�x±===scs�slA��FiR�Ps aic 71432 Benzene U 78933 2-Butangne U . 100 200 , 0 56235 Carbon Tetrachloride U . 050 0 . 5 108907 chlorobenzene U . 050 100 . 0 61963 Chloroform U . 050 6 . 0 7!,354 1 , 1-Dichloroethene U . 050 0 . 7 107062 1 ,2-0tchlaromthane U 1050 0 . 5 17.7184 Tetrachloroathene U . 050 017 79016 Trichleroethene U . 050 0 . 5 75014 Vinyl Chloride U 100 012 -5URR_OGATE. COMPOUNDS RECOVERY LIhLLT-s iJ5 1 ,2-Dichloroetfiane-d4 87 '` 76 - 114 OK To l4ene-do 95 Y. 88 - 110 OR Bromofluorebenzene AB Y, . 86 - 115 UK (U) Indicates compound was analyzed for but riot detected , E Indicates result exceeds highest calibration standard . D - indicates result is based on a dilution . * 2-Butanone a MethV ! ethyl ketene 05/19/99 08:57 FAX 7 83152 WASTE MGMT 0 04/18/99 15:30 FAZ 1 73*1 183 ACCREDITED LA80RATOO S G1007��a ACCREDITED LA60RATORIE$ y INC . TCLP SEMIUOLATILES ANALYSIS DATA CRSE NUMAFR 4281 MATRIX LeDohMjSZ SAMPLE NUMSF:k, 2994ZZZ DILUTION FACTOR 10 ORTR FILE >F8306 DATE EXTRACTED 0°;/17/9 CLIENT NAME W.MQNYDATE ANALYZED 02/17499 FIELD ID CGS ANALY29D BY JANICE =7a�Arraoaga,�;v=sMaaaOya¢a¢zasoeearaa et=�=eat=�=sssa=y=mss=aRa¢arar�rrrr-r-rr-� Regulatory Rp�c l t MOL Loue l CAS No , Ca(Apdund =��i4Y====r=ra-t==tiFiaarrrxrG!!-=QaaPQ3iririrYtl==��=Gv4=i.371aai.....aawawaw .a� 110A41 Pyridine U . 10 5 . 0 106467 1 ,4-Dichlarnbenzene U . 10 7 , 5 95478 2-Methylphenol U . 10 200 . 0 109394 3&4-Methylphenol U . 10 200. 0 67721 Hexarhloroethane U , 10 3 . 0 989103 Nitrobenzene LI . IO 2 . 0 87683 Hexachlarobutadiene U . 10 0 , 95 08062 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 1,1 . 10 7 . 0 9109104 2 ,4.5-Trichloraphcnol U . 50 400 . 6 121142 2,4-pinitratoluene U . 10 0 . 13 118741 Hexachlarobenzene U . 10 0 . 11 878610 Pentaehlererhenol U . 10 10010 U 0 Pr1 S Rcr,•nvEgy LIMITS 5TIRTUA Z-Flucrophenol vz 2 21 - 100 OK Phenol-d5101 X 10 - 94 OUT Nitrobenzene-dg 97 X 35 - 114 OK 2-Fiuorubiphenyl 84 % 43 - 116 OK 2,4,4-Tribroaeophenol 77 x 10 - 123 UK Tvrphanyl-d14 77- Y� 33 - 141 OK U tndicetas compound was analyrad for but not detected , E - Indicates result exceeds highest calibration %tandem; . A -- Indicates rr_suit is based an a dilutten . +' 2-Methylphenol a e-eresal 3-tlethyiphenol a m-cre501 « 4-Mithylphenal - p,-cresol «* 3-•Methy 1 phena i and +4-Mathy l phena 1 can not be separated by the method applied , 05!19/99 08:57 FAX183152 WASTE MC,MT 0 Z05 03/18/09 15:30 FAC 1 T3 1 1383 ACCREDITED LABORATO 9 Q008 ACCREDITED L"ORATORIES, INC. TCLP PESTICTD99 ANALYSIS DATA CASE NUMBER _42_41 MATRIX SAWLL NUMBER 99Q&232 DILUTION FACTOR DATA FILE > DATE EXTRACTED CLIENT NAME WHONY - -- DATE ANALYZED FIELD Xb Cos ANALYZrD BY F Regulatory Result MDL Level CAB No. Compound 58-69-9 G-9$C (Lindana) U .001 0.400 76-44-8 Haptachlor U .001 0. 008 1024-57-3 Heptachlor Epoxide U . 001 0. 008 72-20-8 Endrin U . 002 0. 02 72-43-5 Mathoxyehlor U .010 10.0 5103-71-9 A-Chlordane U . 001 0.03 5103-74-2 G-Chlordane U . 001 0.03 8001-35-2 ToYaphans V .050 0. 5 ADVISORY SURROGATE--CG"OIJNDS C LIMITS - STATUQ retrachlcro-m-xylene 13 It 30 - 150 o1C U - Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected. E - Indicates result exceeds highest calibration standard. D - Indicates result is based on a dilution. 05,119/99 08:57 FAX4183152 WASTE MGMIT [a 06 03/14/99 15:30 FAX 1 7 541 1383 ACCREDIM LABORAT ., Gh 009 ACCREDITED LABORATORIES, INC TCLP HERBICIDE ANALYSIS DATA CASE NUMBER MhTRIX ac SAMPLE R MNER DILUTION FACTOR DATA FILE � -60 DATE EXTRACTED CLIENT NAME DATE ANALYZEDFZSLD ID ANALYZED BY CLIFP Result MDL RBq�vei latory CAS No. compound (mq/1) 94757 2,41-D U .100 10.0 93721 5ILVEX U .010 1.0 V - Indicates compound was analyzed for but not datacted 05/19/99 08:57 FAX 783152 WASTE MGMT OF 1607 05/18/99 16:94 FAX 1 712 1 1983 ACCREDITED LUORATOR 5 Qb003 ACCelD11Eb LABoMTvRIE6, INC. REGRATEO TCLP i4f7me INORUNIC ANALY811 DATA 114e► Cost 0: _ 4261 Matrixc _ Lgggostu Samp(t 9; 9994772Date Received: 05f III" Field 1Os Cos Clime New, WNTY Result MDL OilutIOM Re#ulatory Date CA* No. Element NC/L MG/l. Factor i.swl Method Analyzed srrsaRsrrrssr_aa+�essM7taas�eeea�y:wav�a�c�•ar�w�w��M�s�e.�+e 7440.36-2 Atomic NO 1.00 1 S.00 P Oa/171" 7a10-39-1 8orhm .370 .100 1 100.00 ► 05/17/99 7440.63.9 Cww um ND .100 1 1.00 ► 05/17!99 7440.47.3 Chromium NO 1100 1 5.00 P 45118/1~ 7430-92-1 Lead ND 1.00 1 5.00 / 09/12/99 7419-97-6 Mercury No .002 2 .20 CV 05/14/99 778,2-av-2 Beleniva ND .500 1 1.00 M 05/18/99 741[0.22-6 Silver NO .100 1 5.00 P 03/17/99 NO - EleeNnt wlyzod far but net dateet4a, P - Analyzed by ICP Gy - Ansly&$d by Cold vapor F - Analyzed by GFA A Anolyzed by flame AA 05,"191199 08:57 FAX4183152 WASTE MGMT Z08 03/18/99 13:28 FAX 1 73, 41 lady ACCREDITED L.A80RATOiriES 0 003 PCCAEDITEO LABOAATORIES, 1%. VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS COTO CASE NUMBER MATRIX Soil SIMPLE NUMBER990411 _ _ DILUTION FACTOR i.o �`— DATA FILE »1STQ" DATE EXTRACTED CLIENT NAME YliO)1Y • GATE R"LYZED 05117lQQ _ HELP 10 ,. CGS ANALYZED BY r..as.swss■sacs_aeeeess:ssnsgaaxa�aa■s■:■_■ss:es.=.:.=svxsss •xx:eetssss===�s-;�rssssssasassssaaenee:ane=-es:.es.=.a.xss: CA5 t COMPOUND USAG MOL tAS t COMPOUND U6/K6 MDL efsesssrees.5555Rorole5855::sa■es■ee■■■eeesasaessss■:e::a■s■■ate... ss■■■■.■ssaaxs■esn■s.=:ss.===:sssv ss■saavcs asas■aa urs.u•sa !07029 ln U 26 75274 Bromodichloroeethane U 5 10701 .Acrylonitrile U 16 76875 1,Z-diohloropropane U 5 74973 Chloromethane U 5 10061015 cis-1,3-DichlvrvPrvpene V 3 74837 81'"owthens U 5 79016 Trichloroethene U g 73014 Vinyl Chloride U 5 71432 Benzene U S 15003 . Chloroethane U 3 124401 Dibroevchloromethene U 3 75092 Methylene Chloride it Js 3 74005 1,I,Z-Trichloroethane U 5 11694 Trichlorofluormthone 9 5 10061016 trans-1,341chloropr9pene U 5 75354 1,1-04hlorvethene U S 110756 2-Chloreethylvinylether U 5 75343 . 1,1-81chloroethant U 3 7525Z Brnofora 8 3 156605 trans-l,T-Oichlorasthene U 3 127164 Titrechlvroethene U 5 67663 Chloroform U 1 14 U5 1,1,2,2-Tetrochloroethane U 1 107012 1,Z-Olebloroethane U 5 108003 Toluene 5 J 5 71556 1,1,1-Trichloroethane U 5 108907 Chlcrobenrene U 5 562!1 Carbon Tetrachloride U 3 100414 Ethylbenzene U 5 7P F '@,L... .. Mi i U 1,2-0 iehloroethane-d4 �� >: 10-121 B— tv l uene-d8 �1Q1 t 01-117 alt - Sromoflvorobenzene 7A >i 74-171 Percent solid of 97.1 Is used for all target compounds, 3 - IndicateS compound concontratlon found balou MOL, B - Indicates ocepound found in associated block. U - Indicates compound analyzed for but not dtteoted, F • Indicates fesult exceeds highest calibration standard 0 - Indicates result is based oA a dilution. A - Result exceeds residential svrface soil standards.# 1 - Result exceeds Industria] surface soil standards,o + Flags are based on Ner Jersey soil Cleanup Criteria from Site Rawdiation News Volume 06 Number 1. 05/19/99 08:57 FAX4183152 WASTE MGMT Y Ca 09 09/18/99 15:29 FAX 1 73Z'�541 1383 ACCREDITED LABORAT ES 0 005 ACCREDITED LABORATORIES, INC, BNA ORCANIC ANALYSIS DATA CASE NUMBER 4181 i1ATRIK Sail SAMPLE NUMBER 9904171 DILUTION FACTOR 1.0 DATA FILE >F8179 DATE EXTRACTED OS/12/99 CLIENT NAME W1DNY DATE ANALIZED 05/19/99 FIE11) ID CCS ANALYZED BV DANIEL ==s===35:513 railw.:..seymawsate=i!lae=sw=e:caataeesillaaa.wm wflwmfmmwffff iffaaamisa=waw wawwsia;off aaaf aaffaaafrrmaamfff. CAS Ii COMPOUND U5/K5 MDL CRs 11 COMPOUND UC/KC MDL eab rr..arwr�rlsi„elsssesa=www�lawf¢sf aaaaiaq a:mcom s�w►sv :eeeeeef=e==e=ams==�z;a,atssssalusselsffwaaifff sfsRss.as:w 03329 Ace"aphthene U 540 51265 2,4-Dinitrophemol U 340 208468 Acenaphthylene U 340 111147 I,4-910 trotoluene U 340 120127 Anthracene 0 340 606202 2,6-Dinitrotoluene U 340 56559 Benzo(a)Rnthraosne U 340 117840 01-n-00tyl phthalate 3404 340 30328 6s926(a)Pyrehe U 340 246440 Fluaranthene 99 j 340 201912 Benzo(b)fluoranthene U 340 86737 Moreno D 140 191242 Benzo(g,h,i)PeryleRe U 340 118741 Nexaehlerebentene U 3`0 207089 Benzo(k)Fluoraothene U 340 87483 Nexschiorabutadiene U 340 65050 kbhtgic Acid 290 J 1700 77474 Kexachl4rocyclapents4iene U 340 100516 Renzyl Alcohol U 340 67721 Nexachlo►oethaee U 340 111444 bis(-2-Ch1oroethy1)Ether U 340 IF5395 Indeno(1,1,3-cd}Pyrene U 340 100601 bls(?-Chloroisopropyt)ether U 340 70591 Isophorone U 344 117811 8is(I-Ethylheryl)Phthalate 3890 340 91576 2-1%thyln4phthslene 77 J 140 111911 bisl•2-Chlornethozy)tivthane U 340 93481 7-Mtthylphenol U 340 101553 4-6rovaphenyl-phsnylether U 340 108394 364-Methylphendl 52 J 340 05687 Butylbentylphthelote 7300 f 940 91203 Naphtholene 1300 940 106478 4-Chloreanilipe U 340 88744 I-Nitroanlline U 340 91587 2-Chloronaphthelene U 340 99092 3-4itrasO line U 340 39507 4-Chlera-3-wthylphenol U 340 100016 4-Nitroaniline U 340 95370 2-Chlorophenol U 340 98933 Nitrabentena U 340 7005723 4-Chlorephenyl-phenylether U 340 08755 2-111trophenol U 340 218019 Chrysene U 340 100027 4-Nitrophen4l U 340 $3703 Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene U 740 62790 N-Nitrosodimethylasine U 340 132649 Dikhx0foran U 340 86306 M-Nltrasodiphenyfamine U 340 95501 1,21ichlor0enzene U 340 621647 N-Nitrosv-Di-n-propylaalne U 340 541731 1,3-8iehlorobenzene U 340 87865 Pentaehloropheh41 U 340 106467 1,4-Dichlorobentene 170 J 340 05018 Pheneathrene 150 3 340 91941 3,31-Dichiorobentidine U 340 106P52 phenol U 340 110932 2,411chloropheno) U 340 W000 Pyrene 210 J 340 84662 Diethylphthalate 640 340 110821 1,2,4-Trichlorobenxehe U 340 105679 2,4-Dimethylphenol 0 340 95954 44.5-Trichlorophenol U 340 131113 Dimethyl Phth4lete 120 a 340 88062 2,4,6-Trichlorephenal U 340 84741 Di-n-Butylphthoiote 2100 340 928f5 9en:idine U 340 534511 4,6-Dinitro-2-sethylphenol U 340 123667 1,2-Dipheny1hydratine U 340 jURROCAT1 C81FAM OS 1601ily. _ S7 Til Nitrobenzene-d5 ---y X 13-120 -OK 2-Fluarobipheh9l --X 2 50-i15 0K_ Terpheny1-4114 ..+.1: 4 18-137 Ok Phenol-415 �_Be t 74-113 ,,.9- 141uoropheno1 79 x 75-121 U 2,4,6-Tribroaophenol 11 li 19.121 —OK_ Percent solid of 97.5 is used for all target compounds, J - Indicates compound concentration found beloo MOL, e - Indicates coapaund found in associated blank. U - Indicates compound analyzed far but not detected, E - Concentration sroeeds highest calibration standard, 0 - Indicates result Is based on 4 dilution. of 3-liethylphenol and 4-Methylphenol can not be separated by the method applied 05%19;99 08:57 FAX83152 WASTE MGMT (a 10 05/18/00 13:29 FAX 1 732#41 1983 ACCREDITED LABO ATC 9 2006 ACCREDITED LABORATORIES, 1W INA ORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA CASE 1411MBER 4 MATRIX Sail SAMPLE NUMAF.R 994477201 DILUTION FACTOR 5 DATA FILE HIM DATE EXTRACTED 054121?1 CLIENT NAME _ 04147. . _ DATE ANALYZED 21/1Usy FIELD 10 CGS "10710BT DANIEL � •iiiYYYiiiiYYvasvvss l�filiiiszzsrsrrzssaave�e7'zr=ravna=i_ea yrea:rY!ree=lilSCY iIiYiYYvv4v444a�iYiYfi7aia001Yf a........... EAS 0 EOnP0UN0 U9/9G ADL Cos 6 COMPOUND OF/H DOL :■eiiYiliiblrl=a2i$C�::YiYYYYYYYYY!l��\i��iiYvvvlv4xtYv ---==a==4rr4r4viYYYiai/iY�YYY■YYYYl�iYY!!!l7Yf Y!!b_a=asrrrea 1331! Acenaphthene U 1700 51285 214-Dinitrop4nal U 1700 200968 Acenaphthylene U 1700 121142 2,441 0trotoluene U 1700 120127 Anthrecene 11 1700 606702 2,6-0initrotolaane U 1700 56553 Benvo(a)Anthracene U 1700 117640 01-n-octyl phtheiate 7800 0 1700 50370 90":o(e)Pyrene U 1700 ?06440 F)uarantWne U 1700 ?05911 Bento(b)fluoranthene U 1700 06737 Fluorene U 1100 191142 Be112e(9,111i)Perylene U 1700 110741 HeKachlerebeezene U 1700 207089 Benao(k)Fluoranthene U 1700 67683 lkxechiorobvtadlene U 1700 43850 BeOtole Acid U 8500 77474 Nrlrichlorocyclopentadiene U 1700 100516 Benzyl Alcohol U 1700 67721 Nexaehloroethane U 1700 111414 bis(-I-Chloroethy))Ether U 1700 193395 1ndeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene U 1700 108601 bis(Z-Chloroisopropyl)ethar U 1700 70591 isophorone U 1700 117817 Bis(2•Ethylhexyl)Phthalate 3800 0 1700 91576 2-Methylnaphthalene U 1700 111911 bis(-Z-Chloroetho�y)Methane U 1700 95497 2-Methylphenol U 1100 101453 4-Broaophenyl-phenyltther U 1700 100394 394-Methylp4nol U ' 1700 03617 Autylbentylphthelate 6100 O 1700 91203 Naphthalene 1500 3 0 1700 106471 4-Ehloroaniline U 1700 88744 7-111troanlllne U 1700 91587 2-Chiaronaphthalene U 1700 99007 ;-Nitroeniline U 1700 "IQ? 4-Chloro-3-vothylphenol U 1700 100016 4-4i1roanlline U 1700 95570 2-Chlorophenol U 1700 98953 Nitroteniene U 1700 7005773 4-Chlorophenyl-pheny)ether u 1700 88755 1-Nitrophenol U 1700 218019 Chrysene U 1700 100027 4-111t►ophenal 0 1100 53707 01ben:o(a,h)Anthracene U 1700 62759 N-NitrosadlaethylaMlne U 1700 112649 Oihenzofuran U 1700 96304 M-Nitrosadlphenyleslne U 1700 95501 1,1-Dichlorobenrene 0 1700 67.1647 N-Nitroso-Di-n-propylan�ine U 111,0 541731 1,3-Dlohloroben7ene U 1700 8186; Pentachlorophenol b 1700 106467 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 170 J 0 1700 65018 Phenanthrene 170 3 O 1700 P1941 5,3'-Oichlorobenzidine U 1700 108952 Phlnpl U 1700 170132 2,4-01chlorophenal U 1700 WOOD Pyr"n U 1700 84667 Diethylphthalste iD00 J 0 1700 120621 1.2,4-Trithlorobenxene U 1700 105679 Z,4-Oiwthyiphenol U 1700 951% 2,4,5-Trichlorop1wenol U 1700 17111) Oi"thyl phthalate U 1700 88067 7,4,6-Trichlorophenol U 1700 0474? 01-0-Outylphthslate 2600 D 1700 92975 Benzidine U 1700 574521 44-0 44pa-7-eethylphenol U 1700 122467 1,2-Dipheny1hydru the U 1700 SURRQGAJE Email ACV R 1-I111ts ST�ATU5� Mitrabenzene-d6 —,Sj 1; 23-120 OK_ t-Fluarobiphenyl .—w x 30-115 -JL- Terphenyl-dl4 j t 18-137 , OK phenol-d5 _j� t 24-113 OUT 2-Fluerephenol � 2; 25.171 OA 2,4,4-Tribre"plimal _�3 x 11.121 DR", Pereent solid of 973 Is used for all tatget coepeunds. J - Indicates coepound concentration found below MDL, I - Indicates covq*und found in associated blank. 0 - Indicates compound analyzed for but not detected. E - Concentration exceeds highest calibration standard, 0 - Indicates result is based an a dilution, rr 3-ilethylphenol and 4-Methylphenol pan not be stpareted by the Method applied ` 05/19/99 08:57 FA84183152 WASTE MGMT Y fall 09/16/60 1'3:30 FAX 1 7 541 1383 ACCREDITED LABORA IES Gh 010 ' ACtlt®ITER LABORATC�IES, ItMC PISTICIOUPC9 ORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA GSE Mtimal -4jM1 MATR I It Eoi !AMPLE NUMBER _ DILUTION FACTOR DATA FILE >Ai636 DATE MRACTEO CLIENT NAME DATE AMALYZM T g5ju 9 ftELD ID �CQI ANAITM BY Guff �=ss�aaaaaaasa�.wsaaasa CAS4 COMPOUND Uq/RG IOL 319346 A-SNC 311067 B-iNC 24.0 .664 "M 6-BMC tL hMuna1 u .664 319666 D-Mc u ,d" 76403 Boptsobter 6.69 .664 309002 Aldrin u -654 1024573 Meptschlor 1poxide 04.7 .66t 999944 EnQoautfen 1 17.9 .684 0103719 A-chtord" u -6" $103742 G-chlordane 1618 .684 60971 01stdrin 2.06 1.37 72559 4,40-00E 10.9 1.37 72204 morin u 1.37 Ml$#39 /ndeeulfen 11 u 1.37 72548 4,48-000 2.0 1.37 7421934 EnCIrin Atdohyde u 1,x7 1031078 Endosulfan Sulfate u 1.37 so 4,41.ODT 192 1.37 SM94705 Erdrrn Ketone u 1.37 72435 Methoxychlor u 6.84 M01362 TaxeMwm u 34.2 1267411= Aracior-1016 u 17.1 11104282 Armtor•1221 u 1711 11141163 Aroclor-1232 u 17.1 53469219 APaetor•1242 u 17.1 12672196 APector-1243 u 17.1 11097601 Arocter-1854 u 17.1 110"09 Aroeler-1Zb0 u 17.1 Percent Solid of 97.1 14 uead for alt corset CONPou<uM. e - yn Irdicstes COMPO hd fod in assacisteq blank. j - Indicates cosipMd concentration 43rd WON MDL. u indieates eapau d anslysatl fen but not deteeted. E - Indleatea resutt exeeede hisheat eatitwacion st&mmp d. 0 - indicates resutt is M06d an a dilution. 40 05/19/99 08:57 FAX 4183152 WASTE MGM Z12 05/18/99 16:33 FAX 1 13 41 1969 ACCREDITED I.ABORATO ES Qb002 ACCREDITED! LADORA7oRIES. INC. INORGANIC ANALTSIS DATA SHEET Case *; 4281 Matrix: - Mil _ Sample Ile 9906772 Date Receive43 06/12/99 Ffetd I0: M Clfw7t Names ANNY Result MDL altutlen Otte CAS No. Etament MO/K8 MG es Factor Mlthnd Amtysed =s�aa.T.sca��rsNeeA�leaee�canF��c��+ssw�ssaAlwwN��llC�as-�lt�� ?"0.36-0 Antimww wa 4.4% 1 P 05/16/44 7440-39-2 Arsenic .7d8 .6w 2 F 09/17/09 7440-41-7' 6erYtttum No 1645 1 P 09/18/!1' 7440.43-9 Cedaium 1.20 .645 1 P 05/16/!! 7'440.47.3 Chromium 3.75 1.94 1 P 05/15/99 74+10-30-8 Copper 16.4 1,94 1 P 05/18/99 (439.92-1 - Leed 87.1 16.1 1 P 05/18/94 7439.97-6 Mereury .519 .205 1 e'V 05/14/99 7840-02-0 Nickel 11.9 2.54 1 P 05/18/99 7742-49-2 Selenium ND 1.31 2 F 05/17/99 7'440-22-4 Silver ND .645 1 P 05/18/99 7440-2e-0 Thattfum ND .662 2 F 09/17/94 7440-"-6 7fn0 1'J6 6.41 7 r 05/10/99 Percent Solid of 97.5 to used for ett terW ot~ts NO - Etv"nt anelysad for but not detected. 0 - Anely2ed by ICP CV - Analywad by Cold Vapor F - AnalYcM bV GFA A - Anatyiad by flame AA 051,191,99 108:57 FA. 4183152 WASTE MGMT 'Y z 13 • 05/18/99 15:31 FAX 1 T3�S41 1383 ACCREDITED LABORA O IS moll ACCREDITED LAYORATORIEC, INC. SENI:NAL CRENISTRY ANALYSIS DATA Cog* 0; 4p$1 KOCrlx. Ooil Esxple 0: Date Received: 1 C1 font Nemec _ bMOMY _ X Moisture: Ffe4d Nur"r: [{S DILUTION METRA OLAMK ANALYSIS ANALYTES RESULTS MDL UNITS FACTOR RrsuLry MDL DATE Bolide, Perpent 9T.5 0.10 X 1, 03/131" Flesh Point V200 80. •F 1. 03/13/99 PM 7.10 S.L1, 7. 0511Z/1! cyanide, Reective No 0.21 RQ/Kr 1. NO 0.01 05/13/99 Sulfide, Reactive ND 41.0 No/Ke 1. NO 2.0 05/13/98 Totsf organic Carbon 9950. 106. /K8 1. ND 100. 09/14/" HPR-13-1999 08:52 FRO7194362956 TO 15167347976 F.01 r EnIviromhental Te'9fi ig Litbo"rat6t ies, Inc. 208 Route l09, 1'a>y ungdalexM, 117 5,Phon-6 516.249 -W6'Fax- 516 249.8344 WOO Custody Document-121 d_is 2e iiv6d:;31,31199 40'00;: Sampler!by`N/A ( POat it''Fkx Note 971, Date p 4 , coma l�� G r'o rr,,g/ co. 1G"i.. Phone st.�--✓'G. 7 ,f'��4�'s" Phone N 7� 7.�5`p6 D0, ; rQcr: The +1r+plt6Oroub. FAx 7,Fax« '160 49th,Slreet �� ; Manger:.: L"ee Alter if Reepctfuriy.subMltted, &ia fronment�l.r oh L ratr�rie s,lrlb; ,�ISlStas"lt � <D/ NYS Lab ID # 10969 NJ Cert. # 73812 ,i GT C6tt. # PH0645 VA Cert, # 108 CA Cert: # 2253 NH Cert. # 252592-BA MA" Gert. #NY061 , Rl C.M. # 161 ACert. # 68-535 A�rhrhr� +� hely �i trgailativn 12148- Page 1 APR-13-1999 08:54 7184.362956 T 15167347976 P.02 Enviar�nnt nt�ti Test >t0 Labar tunes Inc. zoo mute 109,farnlinodale i�! 11739 -Pl;irn��t:r-2a4�1�5G.Tax-S 1 G 2�9-8 44 ,d1819� ANAILY3lS:ikeockt •TCLP -Metals aggpi�12140.1 Cliont 3()mpla It): (;rushed Glass Collected: X130149 hAatrlY: Solid- Type:'Greb RwiriarK� Analyzed:412109 + Units pprri` _ ...... MM�� - -�oiicari£rarlo� `� 1440,38-2 Arvdrn 0 Q�St� is 0 u,------- } TAd0:33 3 j arliI1 tlD 1 746� 3=9 Cddmr m t 4 �i t33i ; 'r fiI�37 3 �.Feromam �atl 1��$'� �7" :7i - --4 -3- rpacJ Orb;.: y439 07 5 l�llercu 8�flYflftlno 000 len�l im F 1 i 7440w224 Silver � � 0. U 4, 3 } •ee +f�,gqrrihiron i148- pad; Y , i APR-13-1999 08:56 FFO 7184.362956 TO 15167347976 F.03 c i Lnv'iroftibental Testing Laboratories, lac, 208 Rout' 109,nirmingdolr NY j1735 �hot+o 51G 249-1456 Nx•S1(,40-0144 4!5189 1A)RGA IC rviftlHOn QUAI:;ri URS Q Uuelif ies-vPi•r led enities wtd thou meanings etc.0 folloWs; t Tlic ai+alvii�;itl rYsult is a nhn:rlrtpct. J lndreataa an et111111'a'W'Vdlti 'Mi!CM)":MiAtiot,Wgi dotocted,l�l ttr thin tht Contract t?c�vired 17utdttleJ>LinLt,but�rr.$tn Ihan,the Tvlethild fietectran I„unit, 13. the w1ilyte,w65 found in the i1ocinicil rr>t:lhod blank ar 1ve11 as the s • I ' It Lnflicatt c pbuible%ptobablc bank coutalliirla6m mud wamc the All I= taY9 �+1'T”^rrietr nrrfon 1 The,wrtcuiieitlon of tHP analyte ob�ceeil(mk the triolibration raise of t11c jusiru1,1vn4 1) ''1`atts h ig idtttiifics a]I e0plowilli1,WrnrifIFM In an analytic 3t a•soc6hdary dilutiou. Z.1TORI1—ANN ME7'1•!OD QUA:LME WS, q C - (t'anee)itratlpn►gnniificro arc as tollowy, I3 enicrr rf 1i rhp t+•pt,ited 1 aloe teas obtaiocci fYoru read;ig!hut k rc cess' fltau the Cnmrarr RF.quL#6d Detection Lim t"(CRA )but�reaiet,t6ar,lir rtlnal t�,tl+c Ifpio(rncnrPetecttnn 1.. t(101'), t? ultttrcd 4cn'tht aimlyle w;r vnAlyzm 1�%r;hui'niai dcteated,. Q - quafitiir, "pboifia cntritss ittid tbcar miAni.t+.es are Al fi,it+,rr s F?•thr Trylrlrtrd";i�alue is ectimateci bcocusC of tl1,p ptCK:lxr+1t'intrY,PF`TPi1!'rs'. R9 - (t`QCtlt+xlj tjualil5trc air.As'follows: 1*lamd•,�A , AS Sana autamakd S_�7ct liu hutolltetrfe AU . flu"im-d Cold Vd}1o,. r: Manual8pecit>�ahotottl4tric C' -.tllxlnacc�A NR wh,.M rrte analyte 1s not requited to.bd and*ii& p ]CP itriinetr,u {' ti i r, {, hlrRdaa•r , Tfie a re 1 01011h (Ion 121W poolo�3 .'.�.-= -�-� - �;� ti•,..... •s-.t'*4'r ;.:,vim -:7 M:.:�x;. t..7..'°:,•rrsr '�r. `- �.: ,....- - .__ - "sM�^ ': ,"ars...LM6.. -- ie.v+�..v- �•. .:wt....':+s.fwwr..�,. .r- _ �."•,�s ___ �•�r.�r.��nr�'� '�sr ��`�ri+rw�nYY,+_wts+.�:�. nsp�r.�tr.`v -�..,.. °,4'it ... .... _ - _ � - ��-��47i�3 �� 'A "O?✓#fv��S �k �31�•ti�f11`�'1��t''191F1 �iSX-�r.3d�. _ - - � ••yam - - � ' �� .. S%�Sr - � - •-.S93rxi4!' ,�,�F�•uEi}� -. sw -^!'�j6�ed��l�,- -F' : '�tt�', Y.t�rt 1 1�►�,R —•Y .-•its T+�11�'Myi��it �v �Y�:g'S/K�' � _ a6ia4`�}��_✓�:KiYZC'1(ixf�t!, _N FiiRf(�'�1�`;J+K:. W * ��'.-►Yfi'� �cl'S��a��11R�ri�.Y�J�� ..-`s �+/-�Cf�'j�pY `<{�.i�T.^.�R�J�i.. �Y�,j�''i'Ft�FF/J �'�i'i;�Lr�4�fP'K � �F�.TM ��Xy3c 3CSi.^cS�seRJs�7Tr2�'tfW'6+�kc.�'=T;+a.:s•_'ca'stc.�+b��a+v�•..a w.w+:"::�'..z�:�w.-�-.-:c..sc_... � 5 -3456 5I6-249-3150.- a _ v, „ r � k X16-24.9Q$.� � OD E7trt�ror[trert'r�i�Estutq iAborwor s ,Rc 2p$ ) c�iite L0 - armulgd e Ne--W Yprk 1173 - G •QE2C4N1C11�IL1itGAtTC• iR,1-fH (c AFS TO gi DE CI AIN O CUST'ODY-DOCUMBiT " 48 , �r Y" S r_ Hato-e ';Prirtt'r L +rc�acr htanl e: �7 ref. ,Pro ect ttfarag�r. _€ r;_ g €slg �' Prc}ect AdMes3 n rtpa Ss�SpltSxv�+:r; &ate E=t `e ers,r � u yev� F� ti 4. �b`Q 4� ,J SAMPLE 1H0 AJ wS �' D Cate rtre Tgpe Mahrx / :_ 2.: - �` . g. to �Q r' s t•� Qt r12 cr. 1iefegaishadby 1upudwet. Ffilijc cs Mj~SA,gia t „: Hezoi b �Sa&naiunel date Ptrrrfe� xrne&yage t Tim #talingvrsfied:br;Si�naiu Oat& :PotaodTNanoSt A,gattt:-� Rum' E1rsi!€► afFsuly_ rrt*. - L Pec!'LV4 toyf,T9t+b�Is gp w ate - F1tR1BG�q[R� tiumber&Tvpe of CoMskwoi: f'[c�serYahas:_ - ,...-._ ,..,,,. _..- ..ee...-•--.,�, Y,.__.._ -,..-..,.mss-a• —,---•.r�.. �z•...� _,.e.._,..y....:� :--a.r..•y-,-:.-v ..t•e..: r.. '.,.,•�>"--'_' y. 03- 1799 14 : 13 WASTE 107183882580 P . 01 ` r � 03- 17-99 14 : 13 WASTE N\10 183882580 P - 02 BoRATORIEfi n it; 16 1: C"MtI OF CUSTODY FORM A 4Cf .Wf= A 8QqA roRIFS,INC 20 fFic"NO A\MIOF CJ,.RTtRe-r.Nr.\pd JEMEY 07000 PHONE: (oI ALI-LAAS CL rA C-4 A ................... -7T.Mi.- ............. ........... ........ .............. ............................. i4 TL RNAROU1 FULL NY ASP GIFI CLP Il 1.477---ne e OV:1K Fir eerw%s SIGNI pir-I5r0N6ItR?L1TY FOS SAM UIG. PRI IF- f,4-2 03- 17-99 14 : 14 WASTE II 83882580 P • 03 71341ti'.4t.'+ l�Fi�IlUTL7RIE5 03 '1ti a`a 1). :Y>o C►+� 1 73? "31 1353 ,tGCRED ITi?U i„ a••irinli i;,�tr;M1'Nkif�. [rii. Wt:r ilhthl; . A*�f1.T51: ,IG•{N 11KrRi� f7J`'riF,U :1F.5� G4G C•Nt) ._ Mc rGrr,E I;I,JTYIIri IN TUn _ ..r 1ry9 SAMPLE h•1nr,tn _��r�ul i/�� — �M#T . t1.iNa;:tEG — ]ATG iii 'F -- — -- tipT; NH,a,.1rEJ 6�/Ii/y9 —""'T>:r+ant r _�. ._.. — tL1{1i-I r1�f11 —_- �--- .. --- --- :•r.a•.r•..er[_S•.na. a:..-s..-=. 101 NQS :Cf1YL'lttl} UG: •-....:_r U1fUlINI' is _ ....,:_„__..•._�,<_:,, ._.._..--• !;A". v ca. -o: --• - it i�.l -- - ---:..v••.v•..•.c:::�r..a nr inlr,rn-2-m2LhgIplY�Cl _. ... ._�..-._. _- •-- Sip a 3?G FCr•nhPnL42\e 'll J �5u c:�Y. 2,6-DUitrentwnn) ;5C • L '�c`i�s Rtei41'tZ^lrrpnr, trrl Ii1;G2 T.C-Glnitrotrlll'PnE' 1 645::0 :,S-l'inttrnt0'Uchr fop „ Sod � 'v 1 r,t,tr�idLr Sri>5i n,en_r;!2;r+Rct;r..cene '51 111E=4 i;i-n-cctr p y�12k Fit a;n(y►Y7rtr,E I 7Jhaau 1!t18r�,n!npne ^ g�q�iiDi`1uarDr.i?enE �� ,r� iluor►nt' U rt54a.t ,1 r,C 9� 1 Ir 35Q I+ti147 oen,;u;Sruban:anP �h+t)Fer'11tn� 150 111141 11CKRChIOIl S90 707Ge5 Re-rinlNl:luoranthene? ►SSG 18U� Vill" Hyiaeh,orobuterlllne 11 150 e5H50 cer 'lcA•;'d 990 35ft 470 HPrn,:hloroGyClOhz+titA�trenr q ;:a tt1051e ilNn:ai Flc:h�' h 550 1,1711 ri�eacn,eroeth0nr J ?r,� 1' �L 1i:i-: (binrdott•yl ;r.npr llIr3en�(1+7rj t,+1;:, r,en' ?nR50� hl .('(-fliLrvisvi0r�PY11�Chef la,(rt,prn(ie 11'' Y'Sl• te [ I 7 7-„2�;tr:1r174f,:hAl��' li i9ll fila: i i.rinf0Ptruyv r.Pthaw irlr.thyl(rlx•nal lrlgV a f,r7nnpt,e ji-p',en1�',e`-t,:r148; 4 iFra-trtt9i9her,0 pR0 ,50 i r6y riuUflbenrylphtb+late ;j7tt '18Ptth'tIent U 950 4-Cfilorndi+llir.= !I q;q A4?44 ? N►trotniilna 9 i 581 I Cn'trInaphth.,lent, ;-Fit LB:rS 1 rr•E 150 59947 p 750 51eQ; d-f't,irra-+ rceih>,Iphr,•nl U Q-j�lLrobnil r:e 45578 ?-f.n10rC;l��nz' ii 35C 1000!6 � 157 II tfil Pp45j tJ;trnbcnic�C b ,s5! 1005773 4-(lila+oparw l Ohenylptl+et, 354 881titi ?-!li r"Wienal itBol! thrysrne U ',r0 100071 c-Nltropher,01 �>iQ'• 0 brnZ018,h1R[+tbrQ*ent' 6215. all inr ltrnsOdiA�e:hy• 1)2649 frlbrnicRuran '1u 9^501 .,i-Uithlorobpnzenrr U j3Q 8e3pb (j'Nitrosodiphrn,)lep,lne U iib 3.0 67164' H-hltrosa-Di r-pro➢41a*;ne U 35C tis.1l1 1,'-Olcblbrnhanzrne U ;_,, V 863 rtnte��,laral,r:er,ol fOd467 l,4-GicAlorobtnilDe `Oi) lly ,) 350 4194? J,9`-01tAfOrr;benrldine tl 350 35013 Fl,�ndnthrer•e L 350 p 35+] 101952 Pfrnol 0 350 RIM, 2,4-Dict,lOropreno` 040 )5� 119000 Yyrrue gyp 14662 Di=#hylphthalate 0 <50 ti0wll 1,2,4-?rtehlorobcn2enc li 305E74 7,a•Limethylphrnnl 350 � 350 754757542.4,5' )rlon'orophenal 11 01.10 Olr,ethyl rbthilote 13 350 64,742 Di-n tvtylpnthalate 1500 050 88047 7.,4,6-Triahlero0brnal _ SIIRHOGa C QUNDS . CI1t1LKY_ !I lTS SAT -fluerob}phenu! Ttrpiter,ul-d14 „� 7t >< 18-137CK R Phenol-d5 74 1 ?A-113 —LA— 7-f lvdro lintel 0 t Y5'17l OK 2.4,6-lrPFroAOphen,l _._Az T Perctnt sclid of 45.2 ii used for all toroct cae¢uunds- J - lnditt+crs Loro¢ounrEr e rn ,trdNon found bw'ou t0�. B ' 1ncilCt+tPS Gota¢DUnd f0�tnd lh asaocirrtcu blank. U - Inoicates caepa+aod alalyrBA for but not Aetected+ F - Coneentratiar crtccedf hlyheat celebreeion !stondArd. 0 - 101cites Tesult Is based 01% a WiMerst, .e 3 r►eti,yiphcr+�l qnd 4_M thglphenal tAn not be separated by the owthud opplit'd p . F)r� HF.::i;i 'dET) 1+a0M=' rl �•al 1: 1 2 0'3- 17 '99 14 : 14 WASTE 0- I�183882580 P - 04 u3 I <.t 11 : .�',l IN! lual t:1):,° ArMEOTTED JABORATORIES F.vX 1 732 K4) 133:1 ACCREM11 0 UWOUIORIEB. )%r, 11lWANIC ANALYSn oATA FPREV Mat.tx_ atl+yr _ �,_�---x'55 ------_"�_' Data RucsiYo.; 4y�rp.• Y: � - : t•itl:d ID: - � CtiMt fly: •..w•�aars.-�- = — Nil Oito0on Odic aesutt CAr No. 6lcWst mat= Mc/Ka Factor M•1hGd L+alyzcd _+- .c,--�-.r..�-..�<_:r.�:-.,._-.,.:a+*�•ar.�v�a�v-.�.—�-�e•x.��a•�tsatc 0.�1��• 7L40-36•C 27b .ARtIMOMY LLQ 6 7 1 1 7440-30-2 Aro .r,G2 enlc.40 1 p 03/13/94 Hp 74 -41-7 p�rylli�-n � .66�,db5 1 P (t3/11/vB 7ur-43.9 covive p 03/13/99 7"0-47•S chf-me"A 7 �9 1-" 1 5.99 1.99 1 F 03/13/99 7449-so copper 14.9 1 h 03/13/00 7.:37-9? 1 Lexi 90.4 1.M .210 1 tv 07/17/99 7459.9"r 6 A•rruh' 1 A 173113/94 ;'41.0_02-9 N1Gk�el RD 2.66 1782 � aT/12199 -49-! stteni m N0 F ..b91 691 1 2 03/13/09 7440-2.2.-4 5i lvar 1.99 MD .641 t F Qj/13/+N 74..0-28.0 TI et.i lur 1T.3 t P 11$/13/90 /4Ct7 66 6 Zinc P,rtM+v sot td of95.E js us,0 for Ill ter60r elelDants MD t►nallricd fol out rot detet!■d. o AnAlyzed by ICP Cl - Ahiiy2ttd by Cotd YrRer F Anelytrd by GFA A - An81y7cd Dy ftW* AA u} E1_VF:L__1' Foh1. 71 F;41 n"31 =12 6 — 17-99 14 : 15 WASTE T. 07183882580 "Aril." )1s;111 i)1 "A P - 05 l�tY44iuu� (,.1 IT :49 11 , Id FA.l" i ik llY'tl�- ACCRMTITI) IABpRATORIE` (,J;IA•'fl8 11: 10 r".� 2 702 541 1959 ACca6DttED 1A50RA10R1[:, :NC• G�NCM6 CNEMTsTRr nJl�f rbt: DATA c Cosa !: 6o�7t�1 - — Oae4 Reswivnd. — Sao�c+l -- C t JPnt 11wM'O7 � ilctd Nton4or: DltUT10N ISEThdI Bt+wr AKALY'itS rA[��'sv RESVtTS MPl• Q►rE gNAtY'tS PFSUl.TS k{ft UNITS -- Narco-T 45.2 0.10 b.Ur 1. D3/1S/�A PP 7.06 110 t00. pj/15/97 ►oeal DrOMiG !orOaf. E230. p . �'3 r•Fs"'F I Vr1) P"Rt�M '71 F�41 x,31 5 °may JAMES BUNCHUCK P.O. Box 962 SOLID WASTE COORDINATOR H Cutchogue, New York 1.1935 �y • T(+ (.1316) 734-7685 Fax: (516) 734-7976 SOUTHOLD TOWN SOLID WASTE DISTRICT August 27, 1999 MEMORANDUM TO: Greg Yakaboski FROM: m Bunchuck SUBJECT: Glass Sand Letter Contract Attached is a Draft Letter Contract/Agreement between Waste Management of New York and the Town of Southold re: resumption of glass sand deliveries for the landfill capping. I did not add any language re: the requirement of a surety or bond on the part of Waste Management. I'm not really sure where to go with that . . Do we want 1)to ensure simply that they would remove a pile that tests bad, or 2)would we be looking for them to possibly remove all the glass sand delivered due to a potential future problem, even if the DEC had approved its use?or 3)perhaps are you thinking of even broader future damages or remediation costs should the landfill ever pose a threat down the road? If either 2)or 3)I don't think we'd ever get Waste Management to agree. There are too many things that have been dumped in the landfill over the years for them to take on that liability. If you want to pursue this, perhaps you could call Tara Hemmer of Waste Mgmt. and go over it with her? Otherwise, if this agreement seems good to you, I'd like to bring it to the Board. Let me know what you think . . . JIM 0 * * *DRAFT PROPOSED CONTRACT RE: "Waste Management's Glass Sand" August 27, 1999 Tara Hemmer Waste Management of New York 123 Varick Street Brooklyn,NY 11222 Dear Ms. Hemmer: I am writing in response to Waste Management's offer to deliver fill to the Town of Southold for use as grading material at the Cutchogue Landfill. As you discussed with Jim Bunchuck of my staff, your offer is to deliver the glass sand on an ongoing basis at no cost to the Town. The Town is prepared to accept the glass on this basis. Should this be acceptable to both parties, the Town and Waste Management of New York also agree to the following: 1) The source of the fill delivered to the Town under this agreement shall be exclusively Waste Management's NYSDEC-permitted recycling facility located at 485 Scott Avenue, Brooklyn,NY. 2) The glass sand delivered to the Town shall possess the same chemical and physical/geotechnical characteristics as the test loads delivered to the Town in December 1997 and as described in representative sample analyses sent to the Town(specifically, a sieve analysis showing 99% of the sand at 3/8" or less in size, and a chemical analysis by Accredited Laboratories, Case No. 6064), and on which basis the use of glass sand from Waste Management was originally approved by NYSDEC in a letter to the Town dated August 12, 1998. (see Attachment `A'). 3) The glass sand must meet the guidelines for waste glass gradation and characteristics as specified in the New York State Department of Transportation(DOT)Engineering Bulletin(EB 94-039). 4) The Town of Southold will extract samples of glass sand from each 5,000 cubic yard `stockpile' delivered to the Town by Waste Management, according to procedures outlined in the letter to you from James Bunchuck of my staff dated August 18 (See Attachment `B'). These samples will be shipped to Waste Management which shall 5) have them analyzed by a NYSDOH-certified laboratory for chemical constituents outlined in that same letter. All costs for analysis of glass sand samples shall be borne by Waste Management, as outlined in your letter to Mr. Bunchuck of August 25, 1999 (See Attachment `C'). Waste Management will forward the results of all glass sand analyses to the Town and to the NYSDEC, Region 1 Office. 6) The Town of Southold will maintain unused each stockpile of 5,000 yards, separate and secure from any other materials, until such time as NYSDEC reviews the analytic results provided them pursuant to pararaph(4)above, and approves the use of such stockpile. 6) Notwithstanding any other procedures agreed upon for storing, sampling, and testing glass sand delivered to the Town of Southold landfill, employees at the Town landfill will still visually inspect each load delivered for cleanliness and other physical makeup. The Town reserves the right to reject any load for non-compliance, in which case the load will not be dumped,but will be removed from the landfill by Waste Management at no cost to the Town. The Town also reserves the right to require removal or additional testing, also at no cost to the Town, of any glass sand stockpiled at the Southold Town landfill that is later judged, based on visual inspection,to be in apparent non-compliance,regardless of whether the 5,000 cubic yard threshold is reached in any particular stockpile. Any fill delivered under this agreement that is found, through testing,to be unacceptable due to non-compliance with the chemical and/or geotechnical standards set forth in paragraph(2) above shall be removed by Waste Management of New York within 10 business days. 7) If requested by the Town, Waste Management will agree to provide the Town with 24 hours advance notice of the time, date, and quantity of each delivery. 8) Waste Management shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations concerning transportation of glass sand. 9) Either party may terminate this agreement, for any reason, with at least 24 hours notice to the other party. Such termination will not absolve either party of their responsibilities under this agreement while the agreement was in effect. A signed copy of this letter will constitute a contract between Waste Management of New York, Inc. and the Town of Southold. Please sign below if the above terms are acceptable, and return a copy to me. Upon my receipt of the signed contract, deliveries of fill to the landfill may begin at any time. You should contact Mr. Bunchuck at(516) 734-7685 to coordinate delivery schedules. Waste Management o ,Inc. 8/27/99 Glass Sand Letter Contract p.3 Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jean W. Cochran Supervisor I (we)agree to the above terms for delivery of fill to the Town of Southold. Jean W. Cochran Date Supervisor, Town of Southold (Type name) Date Waste Management of New York, Inc. f � i hDvi rka and CONSULTING Bartilucci ENGINEERS 330 Crossways Park Drive,Woodbury, New York, 11797-2015 516-364-9890 s 718-460-3634 ■ Fax:516-364-9045 e-mail: db-eng@worldnet.att.net May 11, 2000 Mr. James Bunchuck, Solid Waste Coordinator Town of Southold Town Hall 59095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: Explosive Gas Migration to Scale House Southold Landfill Closure D&B No. 1314-G2 Dear Mr. Bunchuck: As we understand it, since several thousand cubic yards of waste were removed along the southern perimeter of the limits of waste in the vicinity of the scale house, monitoring in the scale house (including the basement) has indicated that no detectable explosive gas is migrating into the structure. However, as a precaution, during a recent telephone conversation you inquired about measures to minimize the potential for hazards associated with migration of explosive gas into the scale house. Based on the results of the monitoring, the measures recommended at this time include installation of a continuous explosive gas monitoring system and installation of hazardous location sealing fittings on buried electrical and communications conduits that enter the scale house. The continuous monitoring system should provide for detection of explosive gas in the basement and main floor of the scale house. In addition, an uninterruptible power supply should be provided for the gas monitoring system, the indicator displaying the gas concentration should be clearly visible from the interior and exterior of the scale house, and the system should provide an audible alarm if concentrations exceed the set point. As part of the design for the closure construction, we have included a gas migration control trench on the southern perimeter of the landfill cap. However, if in the future, explosive gas is detected in the scale house, additional measures can be evaluated at that time. In the meantime, if you decide to pursue the recommended measures of installing a monitoring system and sealing the conduits, we would be pleased to provide you with any assistance you need. A DIVISION OF WILLIAM F.COSULICH ASSOCIATES,P.C. OVIRKA AND BARTILUCCI Mr. James Bunchuck, Solid Waste Coordinator Page Two Town of Southold May 11, 2000 If you have any questions regarding this matter or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, Thomas F. Maher, P.E. Vice President TFM/DSGt/cmc cc: D. Glass (D&B) ♦1314\TFMOOLTR-3 LDOC(RO1) FEB-02-00 17 : 31 FROM: ID: 5163649045 PAGF_ 1 / 1 ..l Post-It'Fax Note 7671 1#0ti , 4. pages To From To Co. Phone M Phone kip D f--- Fax S Fax M � + / y ! 00, BASIN N0. 4 CONTRACT LIMIT LINE �� E �<< CONI E EW. FENCE TO EXIS INO--s ENCE EXISTING F TO REMAIN O° x o a 000 0 0-000000 00 �. % •; ••• woo0°00 00 ' 0 -- NOV-27-99 15 : 35 FROM: ID: S 64SO45 PAGE 1/7 r r PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The information in this fax is intended for the named recipients only. It may contain privileged and confidential Dvirka matter. If you have received this fax in error, please notify us immediately by a collect telephone call to(516) 0 and 364-9890 and return the original to the sender by mail. We will reimburse you for postage. Do not disclose the Bartilucci I contents to anyone. Thank-you. d- CONSULTING ENGINEERS 330 Crossways Park Drive,Woodbury,New York, 11797-2015 516-364-9890 •Fax:516-364-9045 D&B FAX NO: (516) 364 - 9045 DATE: November 27, 1999 COMPANY NAME: Southold ATTENTION: Jim Bunchuck FAX NO.: 734-7976 FROM: Dave Glass SUBJECT: Southold Landfill JOB#: NO. OF PAGES: Seven 7 _ (including cover sheet) — MESSAGE: TIM— ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND GAS MIGRATION CONTROL, TRENCH DETAIL AND RELATED SPECIFICATION SECTIONS. IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE WASTE EXCAVATION WORK WHICH YOU WILL BE DOING ALONG THE SOUTHERN PERIMETER, INSTALLATION OF A MIGRATION CONTROL TRENCH AS SHOWN ON THE ENCLOSED SHOULD FURTHER MINIMIZE MIGRATION OF GAS TO THE NEW LEACHING POOLS. PLEASE REVIEW THE ENCLOSED AND WE CAN DISCUSS WHETHER THF TOWN' WOULD BE ABLE TO INSTALL THE GAS CONTROL TRENCH IN CONJUNCTION 1V1TH THE WASTE. EXCAVATION WORK. WE ARE STILL REVIEWING ADDITIONAL MEASURES TO CONTROL POTENTIAL EXPLOSION HAZARDS IN THE SCALE HOUSE. I WILL CALL,TO DISCUSS. A DIVISION OF WILLIAM F.COSULICH ASSOCIATES,P.C. NOV-27-99 15 : 36 FROM: 10: 5 49045 PAGE 2/7 5,-0" TYPE I GEOTEXTILE 6" TOPSOIL Ali lil= I I E I�ilil� - fi., � I I TYPE I GEOTEX ilLE (TYPICAL BOTH SIDES) I I I o I I I WASHED ROUNDED o GRAVEL -PLACED !N I I 24" LIFTS i j =1 �411 i i 3'-0" ow GAS MIGRATION. TRENCH DETAIL N.T.S. t=0 ` 11i"OE Y ONLY. C01`v J7` 1CTION . SEP 1 0 1999 PROJECT No. ORAVMG No. 1314 NOV-27-99 15 : 37 FROM: ID: W649045 PAGE 3/7 6 . Gravel used for fill in the construction of the gas migration control trenches shall be a screened _gravel fill . The stone material shall conform to NYSDOT Standard Specification Item No . 605-2 . 02 , Granular Filter Materials , Type 1 of the referenced specification and shall meet the following criteria . Sieve Size Passing by Weight 1-inch 100 1/2-inch 30-100 1/4-inch 0-30 No. 10 0-10 No. 20 0-5 C . Exe ution 1 . e Contractor shall prepare the subgrade fortP4 tmai tenance roads to the lines and grades as sho on the Drawings . The subgrade surface all be co acted with an approved self-pr elled roller eighing not less than 10 t s . All hollows d depressions which deve op under rolling sha be filled with accept le General Fill materia and shall be re olled. This process of sha 'ng, rolling and f ling shall be repeated until no depressio develop. The Contractor shall lace and ompact a 6-inch (minimum) layer of ecycle concrete aggregate (RCA) over the prepay s grade. The Contractor shall compact the road ace using no less than four passes of the r and shall fill and re-roll any depress ' ns s required and as directed by the Engi er. 2 . The stone fill or the lining f the drainway sluice transi ons, drainage ale linings , drainage do chutes, around the ulvert pipe inlet, out is and around the ripra shall be ' placed on op of the Geocomposite Drain a Layer, as sho on the Drawings, as specified and as direct irer d by the Engineer . The stones sh 1 be pla d so that the weight of the stones are c ried by the underlying material and not by e djacent stones . On slopes, the largest stone ' ♦1314\a0927912.doc(R06) 2 . 11-4 , NOV-27-99 15 : 39 FROM: 0 ID: I3G49O45 PAGE 4/7 ch side and top. The stone filling shall car ully placed and packed by hand so tha he CHDPE a is not compressed or deforme . The top patch hall then be wire laced the top surface of t reno mattress to ieve proper alignment and a eat, compact earance. The lacing shall be in a same nner as described herein for assembly. Where shown on the D ings otherwise directed by the Engineer, ish shall be ut, folded and wired together o suit existing si conditions . Mesh must b leanly cut and surplus m cut out completel or folded back and neatly wir to an adjace Reno mattress face. Cut edges of esh sh be securely laced together with lacing w- the manner described above . 6 . The Contractor shall install the screened gravel fill in the gas migration trenches . The gravel placed in the gas migration trench shall be placed in 24-inch layers from the bottom of the trench to within 6-inches of the surface. Geotextile Type 1 shall be installed along the sides of the gas migration trench before the gravel fill is placed and on top of the gravel fill when the filling is complete as shown on the drawings, as specified and as directed by the Engineer . The gravel shall be placed in a manner that will produce a reasonably well graded mass of stone. layer in the construction si pad shall be in on the Drawings, ie and as directed by==M!; 4131a\aO827912.dcc(RO6) 2 . 11-7 NOV-27-99 15: 39 FROM: ID:03649045 PAGE 5/7 C . No geotextile shall be shipped until the affidavit is submitted to the Engineer. I' -----� C . materials I1 . Type I Geotextile a. The geotextile shall be an 8 oz . /sq. yd. continuous filament polyester or polypropylene nonwoven needlepunched fabric . The fabric shall be inert to commonly 1 encountered chemicals, biological ' degradation, hydro-carbons, acids, alkalies and mildew. The fabric shall be resistant to rot, ultraviolet light, insects and rodents . b. The polyester or polypropylene filaments ' shall be formed into a stable network such that the filaments retain their relative position. C . The manufacturer shall provide certifications that each roll (identified by roll number) of geotextile conforms to the requirements of these specifications . The certifications shall be submitted to and reviewed by the Engineer prior to the installation of the material . d. The geotextile polymer composition shall be at least 95% polypropylene or polyester by weight . e. The minimum roll width shall be 15 feet . 1 The roll length shall be maximized in order to minimize seams . ff . The Type I Geotextile shall be TG700 as manufactured by Evergreen Technologies, Inc . , Hoechst Celanese, 801 Geotex as manufactured by Synthetic Industries or approved equal . g. The Type I Geotextile shall conform to the properties listed in Table 4 . 1-1 . •1314/kC920902.doc(R04) 4 . 1-5 NOV-•27-99 15: 39 FROM: 0 ID: *649045 PAGE 6/7 Table 4.1-1 TYPE I GROTEXTILE Fabric PropertY Test Method unit specified Qualifier(l) Value Fabric Weight ASTM D5261 oz/sq yd 7.9 MARV Thickness, t ASTM D5199 mils 85 MARV Grab Strength(2) ASTM D4632 lbs 210 MARV Grab Elongationf21 ASTM D4632 % 50 MARV Trapezoid Tear ASTM D4533 lbs 80 MARV Strength12) Puncture ASTM D4833 lbs 100 MARV Resistance Mullen Burst ASTM D3786 psi 320 MARV Strength Water Flow Rate ASTM D4491 gpm/sq ft 90 MARV Permittivity ASTM D4491 sec'1 1.2 MARV Permeability ASTM D4491 cm/sec 0.3 MARV Apparent Opening ASTM D4751 sieve size 70 MARV Size (AOS) mm 0.212 UV Resistance ASTM D4355 % strength 70 MARV retained pH Resistance 2-13 Range Notes: (1) MARV - Minimum Average Roll Value. (2) Values in the weakest principal direction. •1314/k0820902.doc(ROU 4 . 1-7 ,NOV-27-99 15:40 FROM: if ID: 510649045 PAGE 7/7 o 2 . -Bek @N +reI1 €--- eetoevekiIe dei imp -tell---ekesely -ensawe---the--manmiaemirer, a none? azle - if+�ne�e �aeT-and, -ereeeewe 3 . Geotextile shall be protected from ultraviolet light exposure, precipitation or other inundation, mud, dirt, dust, puncture, cutting or any other damaging or deleterious conditions . 4 . i--g�ava eke all--babe r---pend i 5 . Rolls shall be stored in a manner which protects them from the elements . 6 . The Contractor shall not use any hooks, tongs or other sharp tools or instruments for handling the rolls . The Contractor shall utilize non-damaging slings or a pole which extends a minimum of 1 foot beyond each end of the roll to unload or handle individual rolls . 7 . The geotextiles shall not be dragged along the ground. B . .., -Alt- 4-1, tJfp_-. — ___--ill-bak %ien p see--der e r 9 . geotextile materials which have b � appro properly handled and stored, for which acce a roll certificati ave been received and aPpr shall be talled. 10 . The Contractor s asst. the Engineer in obtaining co ance samples fro a material at the a of placement . A conforman ample s measure 3 feet in roll length by the w ♦1314/k0820902.doc(R04) 4 . 1-10 MBIENT AIR MONITORING I 0`v DINT LOCATION REATER THAN 25X LOWER �\ XPLOSIVE LIMIT (LEL) ' FORM AREA BORROW 14 Q REA OF POTENTIAL EXCEEDANCE F 25X LEL BASED ON ONE ROUND 14A F OVA READINGS >1000pm )ASHED WHERE INFERRED I 1148 0 x 4 12 /12C 12D 12E "F 1 1 3A 13B 14C 118 11A 1�y�11E 11�/ 12 / I ..._ 1 _ 15A I r GER 1`� / 158 METHANE VENTING TRENCH ,S100 FT. , 1 � i r5C � APPROXIMATEI 15D `46 V --� 1 �/ LIMITS OF I � / 10 WASTE ELEVATE LANDFILL 5E / I XIMATELY AREA 15� 3FT. I � I 5 � 8C I I 6 s COMMERCIAL BI—LEVEL DROP—OFF STATION FOR RECYCLABLES 19 OVERHEAD ELECT LINES 6 / 6\\` Al �� 20• 78 � 3A 3 A HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE 7A -'��'�8 F CONTAINMENT FACILITY A4 O I C 23 22 WASTE OIL S - A\ D 4 o STORAGE TANKS 1 1 2 COLLECTION CENTER �I 35� I � STORAGE C3 I C7 II 28 WEIGHING STATION GARAGE34 (SCALE HOUSE 9 � ' I R3C3 � 2 � 2 1 lJ ROAD 48 I 33 0 (COUNTY [� ❑ _ n ROAD ----�')� "ORTM 0 300 600 13 :/09/98 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD - SOUTHOLD LANDFILL CLOSURE INVESTIGATION and Bartilucci EXTENT OF SOIL GAS GREATER THAN 257o OF THE ng fnW'"iam F. Cosulich Associates. P.C. LOWER EXPLOSIVE LIMIT FIGUR' 4-24 MONITORING POINT LOCATION Q`'❑ AMBIENT AIR MONITORING \\\ POINT LOCATION 0 GREATER THAN 25X LOWER IFORMER BORROW EXPLOSIVE LIMIT (LEL) II AREA 14 AREA OF POTENTIAL EXCEEDANCE II �j 14A OF 25X LEL BASED ON ONE ROUND OF OVA READINGS >1000 pm �� 114B 0 (DASHED WHERE INFERRED 38 4 12 1 2C 12D 12E I 12F 1. 13A 1 • 14C II I 118 11C 1•�t 1E 11fr/ 12 / 15A I11A I METHANE VENTING �n MER 1�� / \15B TRENCH VENGER f OTEONS 100 FT. 1 �/ I f 5C I APPROXIMATE I 15D 4146 / LIMITS OF I WASTE ,0 ( ELEVATED 15E LANDFILL _ � I I AREA 15� PROXIMATELY I ' 5 — — 300 FT. I COMMERCIAL BI-LEVEL DROP-OFF a y" STATION FOR RECYCLABLES I � 19 ELECTREIACD LINES ' �6 % Al i� 20 78 i A3 A HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE �B 3A 3 F CONTAINMENT FACILITY 7A o 7 22 7 c 23 WASTE OIL A4 _ _O I as D o STORAGE TANKS I II 1 `�2 A2 COLLECTION CENTER ��5' I � STORAGE _� 2STATION ION GARAGE '�I� 34 SE 48 LJ (SCALE HOn ( I O 2 31 ROAD I ry 33 0 (COUNTY U �I NORTH ROAD 0 300 _E 1314 11 1314-03 _— ms-09/09/96 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD — SOUTHOLD LANDFILL CLOSURE INVESTIGATION ivirka and Bartitucci EXTENT OF SOIL GAS GREATER THAT 25% OF THE FIGURE " `ons�+�n9 Enginsen LOWER EXPLOSIVE LIM Division of William F. Cosulich Associates. P.C. .MBIENT AIR MONITORING II u\1 'DINT LOCATION REATER THAN 25% LOWER Il MER BORROW \ XPLOSIVE LIMIT (LEL) II ) FORMER 14 .REA OF POTENTIAL EXCEEDANCE �r / )F 25% LEL BASED ON ONE ROUND I 14A )F OVA READINGS >1000pm DASI4ED WHERE INFERRED ' 1148 4 4 ,2 I12 C 1 2b 1 2E r1�F 13 13A 130 I o ^� • 14C 1B „C 15A i 1 E „y +� 11A AGER 1`� ~ 158 METHANE VENTING TRENCH 4S 100 FT. ,, I r5C 1 /�APPROXIM OF ( 15D d46 ED / --� LIMITS 0 10; WASTE C r ( ELEVATED 15E � LANDFILL AREA 15 )0 FT. I I I �r 11 e COMMERCIAL 81–LEVEL DROP–OFF 8A STATION FOR RECYCLABLES � 19 LINES E1C4D 8 \ Al �� 20 78 3 A —HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE 7A �8 F CONTAINMENT FACILITY ^ 7 ` C 23 22 8 7 D STORAGEI TANKS 6 - 1A 4 5A C7 ,I Ov a l 1 t1 • 2 COLLECTION CENTER C== ( 35� I t� STORAGE C] ( � 28 WEIGHING STATION GARAGE I 34 II (SCALE HOUSE 29 Q I 2 •1 t.J tY ROAD I �y 3 '� (COUN NORTH ROAD I 0 300 600 -03 09/09/00 - - --- TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -- SOUTHOLD LANDFILL CLOSURE INVESTIGATION <aand Bartilucci EXTENT OF SOIL GAS GREATER THAN 25% OF THE ,hi Enillneem LOWER EXPLOSIVE LIMIT FIGURE 4-2- +ision of William F. Cosulich Associates, P.C. R 'C s D� 17 )lc11F SIGH LCL D� L e L Da. E. t Da Lt Z 6.:z LE L as �Vli L i oL �_5 t� � 5 Q w SENT BY:Xerox Telecopiel&20 ;12- 3-7? : 1 :56PM X163648675- 7347976;# 1 d1Dvirka and Q Bartilucci CONSULTING ENGINEERS 330 Crossways Park Drive,Woodbury,New York, 11797.2015 518-364-9890 a Fax:516-384.9045 TElEFU NO: (511) 804-SOU DATE ' COMPANY NAME: TQW K J0 S,a u�c XMNTION: I'm �v hGH v c tc FAX NL: 734 — III FROM: Daysd 0w1-6LxOViLI\ ' SUBJECT: 0.OF PAGES: (including cover sheet) MESSAGE: A �1�M M.On' Y I ')k fit G �a e- o"ec-4c �• ISD 15 l It E H F Ilk G a KAria ^- S sus. . hl,se ve n I t o e4-t t > l LE v� � r "hI 4 -6 t ph. lVq ti anol 3 - 2 ac t ooh tea t I o v w�;� s +U t - �V W0. I� i v n bow v ib Svtt. 1 ks4h - !� � } r 4v6t 4nr XO _ ov,[e q i A- ;yr 41- 44ey r'ev--Ove vi 1v+ IkWAV $ 40 won, �Vvs SGAJ4r- (\V\. W . Ml*,r fe-cord re adetkjr o g;ve w�c- call THANK YOU: A DIVISION OF WILLIAM F.COSULICW ASSOCIATES,P.C. SENT BY:Xerox Telecopiero0 ;12- 3-7? ; 1 :57PM ; 03648675-+ 7347976;it 2 AND DESIGNATION • TEMPORARY EXPLOSIVE GAS ) FORMER BORROW MONITORING POINT LOCATION II AREA 1 J AMBIENT AIR MONITORINGI �� POINT LOCATION 'n 1148 0 43 12 12C 12D 12E gF 13 13A 138 114C 1 +.-� rte► r^' � 11® iic FRMSCAVENGER 1�� 1 METHANE VEN I TRENCH LATE LAG 100 F1`. //APPROXIMATE ( � / 10� LIMITSOF 1 ' ELEVATED 13 1 LANDFILL / � ( AREA APPROXIMATELY 300 FT. ` 1 1 r� �1 ec 8 •SO 5 ERCIAL 81— L DROP—OFF ` TATION FOR RECY BLES 1 �R 19 LJNES IC _ �B 1Q\N` Al �� 20 4 1 - - 3A 3 A HOUSEHO HAZA D US WASTE 7A .,��,,,..�„4�,•+d® ` F CONTAINM N1' FACI +rr►��,�,. 2 232 WASTE 01L 1A` STORAGE TANKS `2 COLLECTION CENTER ftw . I !t ME O 3I 29 WEIGHING STATION 34 (SCALE HODS 2. Q y 2 '1 (COUNTY ROAD 48 C� ❑ cn TH ROAD N � 0--- - 300. 1314 131 -11 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD - SOUTHOLD LANDFILL CLOSURE INVESTIGATION Dvirka and Bortiiucci EXPLOSIVE GAS MONITORING POINT LOCATIONS E AA DMOM of Whom F. Cosufiich ANocIct". P.C.