Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLL-1989 #13LOCAL LAW NO, '13'. 1989 A Local law in Relation to Zoning BE IT ENACTED by the Town Board of the Town of Southold as follows: I. Chapter 100 [~zoning) of the Code of the Town of Southold is hereby amended as follows: '. Section 1O0-61.B(L~) is hereby amended by adding thereto a new subsection "e" to read as follows: The maximum size of the guest unit shall be six hundred (600) square feet. This Local Law shall take effect upon its filing with the Secretary of __ State. Date 12 & 13 Local Law(s) No. Year 1989 Municipality. Tow~_ of Sour. hold Please be advised that the above-referenced material was received and filed by this office on 7/11./89 Additional forms for filing local laws with this office will be forwarded upon request. Z83602-004 (4/8~) ~ECE~VED *.,989 NYS Department of State Bureau of State Records NYS s , Departme~ State Bureau of State Records 162 Washington Avenue Albany, NY 12231-0001 Town of Southold Office of the Town Clerk Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attention: Ms,-Terry i,,,11,,,ti1,i...:1,,, h,, iilh,,h h,,,ll,, J,,hl: I:1 {Please Use this Form for Filing your Local Law with the SeCretary o! State) Text of law should be given as amended. Do nol include matter being eliminated and do not use italics or underlining to indicate new matter. ~o~y T~oown of Southold Local Law No ...... 1.~. ................. of the year 19 8..9 ........ Alocailaw In Relation to Zoning ................................... (Insert title) Town Board of the Be it enacted by the. (Name of Legislative Body) Town of $outhold ~:' ........................................................................... as follows: I. Chapter 100 (zoning) of the Code of the Town of Southold is hereby amended as follows: 1. Section 100-61.B(4) is hereby amended by adding thereto a new subsection "e" to read as follows: (e) The maximum size of a guest unit shall be six hundred (600) square feet. II. This Local Law shall take effect upon its filing with the Secretary of State. (If additional space is needed, please attach sheets of the same size as this and number each) (1) (Complete the certification in the paragraph which applies to the filing of this local law and strike out the matter therein which is not applicabl.e..) 1. (Final adoption by local legislative body only.) I hereby certify that the local law annexed hereto, designated as local law No...1.3. .... of 19.8..9 ..... X~t)X Southold Town Board of the Town of ................ was duly passed by thc ......................................... ~3~1~(~~ (Name of Legislative Body) on ..... .J..u.!y...S.t ............. 19 ..8..9....'in accordance with the applicable provisions of law. (Passage by local legislative body with approval or no disapproval by Elective Chid Executive Officer,* or repassage after disapproval.) [ hereby certify that the local law annexed hereto, designated as local law No .......... of 19 ........ County City of the Town of ................ Village was duly passed by the ..................................... (Name of Legislative Body} .... not disapproved and was approved repassed after'disapproval by the ............................ Elective Chief Executive Officer* and was deemed duly adopted on .................................. 19 ......... in accordance with the applicable provisions of law. ~ 3. (Final adoption by referendum.) I hereby certify that the local law annexed hereto, designated as local law No ......... of 19 ........ County City of the Town of ................ Village on ............................. 19 ........ was duly passed by the ......................................... (Name of Legislative Body) not disapproved and was approved repassed after disapproval by the ............................ Elective Chief Executive Officer* on .................................. 19 ..........Such local law was submitted to the people by reason of a mandatory permissive referendum, and received the affirmative vote of a majority of the.qualified electors voting general thereon at the special election held on ............................. 19 ........ , in accordance with the applicable annual provisions of law. (Subject to permissive referendum, and final adoption because no valid petition filed requesting referendum.) I hereby certify that the local law annexed hereto, designated as local law No ......... of 19 ........ County City of the Town -of ................ Village was duly passed by the ......................................... (Name of Legislative Body) not disapproved and was approved repassed after disapproval by the ............................ Elective Chief Executive Officer* on .................................. 19 .......... Such local law being subject to a permissive referendum and no valid petition requesting such referendum having been filed, said local law was deemed duly adopted on ............................. 19 ......... in accordance with the applicable provisions of law. *Elective Chief Executive Officer means or includes the chief executive officer o! a county elected on a county-wide basis or, if there be none, the chairman of the county legislative body, the mayor of a city or village or the supervisor o! a town where such officer is vested with power to approve or veto local laws or ordinances. (2) 5. (City local law concerning Charter revision propOsed by petition.) I hereby certify that the local law annexed hereto, designated as local law No .........of 19 ........ of the City of ................................. having been submitted to referendum pursuant to the provisions of~ of the Municipal Home Rule Law, and having received the affirmative vote ora special, majority of the qualified electors of such city voting thereon at the general election held on ............ ............ 19 ......... became operative. 6. (County local law concerning adoption of Charter.) I hereby'certify that the local law annexed hereto, designated as local law No ......... of 19 ......... of the County of ..................... , State of New York, having been submitted to the Electors at the General Election of November ............ ,19 ....... pursuant to subdivisions 5 and 7 of section 33 of the Municipal Home Rule Law, and having received the affirmative vote of a majority of the qualified electors of the cities of said county as a unit and of a majority of the qualified electors of the towns of said county considered as a unit voting at said general election, became operative. (If any other authorized form of final adoption has been followed, please provide an appropriate certifica- tion.) I further certify that I have compared the preceding local law with the original on file in this office and that the same is a correct transcript therefrom and of the whole of such original local law, and was finally adopted in the manner indicated in parag[aph ........ ! .... above. Date: July 6, 1989 Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk (Seal) (Certification to be executed by County Attorney, Corporation Counsel, Town Attorney, Village Attorney or other authorized Attorney of locality.) ~- STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ....$..U..F..F..O..L..K. ............... I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing local law contains the correct text and that all proper proceedings have been had or taken for the enactment of the local law annexed hermo. Signature James A. Schondebare, Town Attorney Title Date: July 6, 1989 X~x~t~Go,la of Southold Town .................................. (3) IN THE MATTER OF PUBLIC HEARING SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD May 23, 1989 3:30 P.M. THE PROPOSED "LOCAL LAW IN RELATION TO ZONING". Present: Supervisor Francis J. Murphy Justice Raymond W. Edwards Councilwoman Jean W. Cochran Councilman George L. Penny IV Councilwoman Ruth D. Oliva Councilwoman Ellen D. Larsen Town Clerk Judith T. Terry SUPERVISOR MURPHY: This is a hearing a on a proposed "Local Law in Relation to Zoning", concerning hotel guest unit. The official notice to read by Councilman Penny. COUNCILMAN PENNY: "Public Notice is hereby given that there has been presented to the Town Board of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, on the 11th day of April', 1989, a Local Law entitled, "A Local Law in Relation to Zoning". Notice is further given that the Town Board of the Town of Southold will hold a public hearing on the aforesaid Local Law at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, on the 23rd day of May, 1989, at 3:30 o'clock P.M., at which time all interested persons will be heard. This proposed "Local Law in Relation to Zoning" 'reads as follows, to wit: BE IT ENACTED by the Town Board of the Town of Southold as follows: I. Chapter 100 (Zoning) of the Code of the Town of Southold is hereby amended as follows: 1. Section 100-61.B(4) is hereby amended by adding thereto a new subsection "e" to read as follows: (e) The maximum size of the guest unit shall be six hundred (600) square feet. II. This Local Law shall take effect upon its filing with the Secretary of State. Copies of this Local Law are available in the office of the Town Clerk to any interested persons during business hours. Dated: May 9, 1989. Judith T. Terry, Southold Town Clerk." I have an affidavit of publication from the Traveler-Watchman, a like affidavit from the Suffolk Times. I have an affidavit of posting from the Town Clerk, that this was posted on the Town Bulletin Board in the proper fashion. I have the following communications. The Planning Board Office sent a letter to the Town of Southold, "Deal' Mrs. Terry, The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, May 1, 1989. Resolved that the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to the Town Board that they adopt the above .mentioned proposed Local Law. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman." From the Department of Plannincl, Suffolk County. Gentlemen, Pursuant to the requirements of Section A14-14t~2'3of the Suffolk County Administ.-ative Code, the above referenced applica- tion, which had been submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is con- sidered to be a matter for local determination. A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz, Director of Planning." We have a communication addressed to 'Pg 2 - Public hearing, L[.~.~.~ relation to Zoning, hotel gue:~,, the Town of Southold. "Dear Mr. Murphy, With regard to the proposed Local Law in Relation to Zoning, hotel guest units, I would like to make the following observa- tions. 1. The creation of a 600 square foot maximum size unit will create less equality in resort residential district units as it is proposed. A. This sizing of units precludes the design of suite accom~dations now being soug~_~ in. the hotel indu_S_try. This would pos~bly eliminate a first-class hotel operation from Southold Town. B. The amendment fails to state as whether this proposed requirement size is to be a maximum per unit, or an average for a maximum for the project. C. As this use is al. ready by special exception, each project should be sized as to area by the Zoning Board of Appeals to keep the project in relation to the surrounding neighborhood. D. From a practical standpoint have you ever considered a tourist with children, being on vacation, in a 600 square foot area? Thank you for your consideration. SincerHly,Henry E. Raynor, Jr." There are no further communica- tions. SUPERVISOR MURPHY: Thank you, George. You've heard the official reading of the notice of this proposed Local Law. Is there anyone in the audience, who would like to speak in favor of this proposed Local Law? (No response.) Anyone like to speak in opposition? GEORGE WETMORE: Good afternoon, Mr. Supervisor and Councilman,: Councilwoman. I have come before the Town Board, today, in opposition to this ruling, or law, whatever you want to call it. I'm curious as to who thought it up. However, the well intentions attain the goals that you're seeking. I don't know if any of you follow the Resort Trade. This is a trade magazine, and guess who's the big trader on the front cover here. COUNCILWOMAN COCHRAN: Mr. Trump. GEORGE WETMORE: And right down here in the left hand corner, it says all suites, today's most dynamic segments in the industry. Ruth had made a remark the other night at the Code Committee, that, well, look at that North Fork Beach Motel. They're not doing any business anymore. You know, you got rooms there and everything. Ruth, that motel's thirty-five years old. Has no .amenities, and it's just a little box, the people have to stay. That's why they're not coming. People demand luxury today, and they're willing to pay for it. I have run the Dering Harbor Inn. I have run Beachcomber Motel. I have run the North Fork Beach Condominiums. I've, also, run other condominiums and co-ops, and I know if you want to know what would protect yourself from having residents, you should have asked us in the trade. We know the tricks of the trade. We know the games that are played. We know how to restrict it through prospective rules and through Town conditional CO's. You'd accomplish anything up to 840 square foot, because a drawing of it. You could do it that way, administratively. Very easily, and still have a luxurious unit and a beautiful resort, and I'm talking about swimming pools, tennis courts and the ~.menities that go along with a first class operation. The Chamber has felt very strongly, and I do speak for the Chamber of Commerce, today. I am it's vice-president, and that's the Greenport-Southold Chamber, but we feel very strongly, we've been shortchanged. The Master Plan studied the past objective of fishing, farming, and tourism. Fishing is practically down the tubes. Farming is on it's way. What are you going to do? Kill the tourists, too? Everybody might just as well fold up shop, and go south like everybody else. We try to hang on out here. Now I represent 200 plus of the better businesses in these two little towns out here, and we are very upset. We like to see a first-class operation run a first-class way. I'm quite beside myself, again, that we weren't Pg 3 - Public hearing, LI:ii~'.'? relation to Zoning, hotel consulted in the industries, because we think that we could give you the policies that would make it work. Size has nothing to do with use. It never did. Basically, if you're dealing with an individually owned unit, you're dealing with a management company, and they don't want to see that guy in theKe, because they aren't getting any income out of it, so they're going to be blowing the whistle just as a fast as anybody else. Also, you haven't studied this law? What it's economic impacts are? I know of two proposals before the Planning Board, probably worth about $80,000,000. in resorts to the Town. You cut the room size down, you cut the room rents down, you reduce 80,000,000,down to 50,000,000 causing a $30,000,'000.00 loss. Somebody's going to have to make that up, because those applications are actually in front of the Planning Board. Income? Right now they run about $20,000.00 a year for a one bedroom, and $30,000.00 for an all suite two bedroom. To start, and that's not with occupancy. We're talking occupancy with ten to twelve weeks during the summer, and weekends in the fall. Now these resorts, we hope 'will draw into the late fall and winter.to build those seasons, which we so desperately need out here. Everybody needs it when the roads are jammed for ten weeks, and glad to see them go home. So am I. But, we need that extended season, parti- cularly into the fall, and I for one, and the directors, don't know why you're doing this, because if you had come to us, we would have worked with you, and shown you how you could have done it, because you're killing the family vacationer by sizing down the rooms. That is the biggest secret today, to keep the narrow room, and narrow over here, and they're willing to pay 250 bucks a night for it on a weekend. During the week, no. You get about $195. Now we have gotten those rates. I've gotten $265.00 a night, and those rooms are about 1,000 square feet. However, Southold has a contingency where they deal with 850 they are considered You can respect that by staying just under. I would recommend that this law be voted down for several reasons. Number 1, why was it brought up? What violations have been brought to you as a Board? Who was using their units right now as a drawing room? Have you had any complaints? If you don't, don't fix it. SUPERVISOR MURPHY: George, I think this was left 'out when the Master Plan was adopted. GEORGE WETMORE: I sat there with Stoutenburgh on the Mls and the M2s when originally it was just marine zone. We went through this whole nine yards, and those were not put in specifically for the idea of a luxurious resort. We've only got about five sites in town where we can do that. Some are still subject to their own sewage treatment approval by the Board of Health, the DEC and so forth, so they could be twenty years down the road. So we have two sites right now that could, could result probably in the next five to ten years, if they ever get approved. The fact that we need it desperately. The taxes are going up. You throw that assessment on the tax rolls, and it would help, without adding to the school usage and what have you. These people are non-residents. There are other people talking about taking motels off the waterfront. This is the dumbest thing I ever heard in my life. Our whole draw has been the water. That's why people come out here, to enjoy the clean water, and d--- it, I'm for clean water. I want to see it stay that way, but there are treatment systems today, and that's why I'm pushing for a more luxurious resort, because I know they would spend the money for the better systems, rather than have a-down side system dealing with cesspools, dealing with leaching problems and everything else. People are I~g 4 - Public Hearing LL .... 'relation to Zoning, hotel guest.,,.,, not going to come out here to watch the potatoes grow. No way. So you're going to kill, and that's the only thing we have left. Fishing is dead. What little bit we do have come in. The other thing is more density. No more density there is no economical development. You want to go with that. We only need four or five hundred rooms, maybe eight hundred tops, and that's over ten or fifteen years. 'own from nothing built that I know for thirty years. New. There's been a couple of proposals, a couple of maps approved, but nothing new. Today's market, you need a luxury product, houses for year round. Atleast we could get mini-conventions. You got Connecticut accross the way. New York City now, forget it. That's a pain in the neck with the LIE. We'll get some. But it is there. The trade is there. They just need a source point to come to, and then the local merchants will be able to pay their taxes, rather than hang on by their finger nails. We ask you as a Chamber of Commerce, to vote this down. Please consult with us. Let's go over it. We'll show you how to do it administratively, and you'll accom- plish more doing it administratively, than sizing rooms. Thank you. SUPERVISOR MURPHY: Thank you, George. Anyone else like to address the Town Board to speak in opposition to this proposed Local Law? (No response.) Any Town Board members have any comment? COUNCILMAN PENNY: Somebody left me, today, a copy of an article by the hotel planning and design by Walter A. Rutes, FAIA, I imagine that's a form of architect. A guide for architects, interior designers, and hotel executives. It addresses some of the concern that ~ere raised by the gentleman that just spoke, and, also, by the letter that we got by Henry Raynor in this regard. It addresses particularly the mood of the industry and the mood of the people going toward this suite complex, and it gives some comparative of how things are going to change, and what is required for a suite, and I won't read the whole thing, because it's several pages long, but I'd like to read some of the highlights. Therefore while the typical suite is only 40% greater in area than the single room, which they designate the single room as 475 square feet. But if you take 475, and add 40% to that, that comes out to 665 square feet. Compared with a standard king-size room with'a hideabed sofa, the two-room suite requires only a few additions, the most expensive being an extra TV. Other compensating savings are in the reduced public and service areas discussed below. The typical suite unit consists of a separate bedroom, bath- room, living/dining room with a wet bar, and occasionally,, and I want to underline that occasionally because I'm not recommending kitchenettes. But few guests use the kitchenette, which requires extra space, expensive equipments, and related mechanical costs. Therefore, except for larger two and three-bedroom units, which are designed for longer-term relocated families, the kitchenette has not proved cost effective. It has benerally been replaced by a wet bar, with a counter sink, glass cabinet, mini-refrigerator and coffee maker, normally built into the wall unit or credenza in the dining area close to the plumbing riser for economy. Then it goes in further. Trends. The public has been impressed with the freshness of the all-suite concept and the distinctive prototypes that have appeared. Improve- ments will continue in this relatively new and maturing hotel type. The living/dining room will be further developed to accommodate a flexible variety of features such as computers, business equipment, exercising machines, folding wall beds, and housekeeping facilities for the convenience of business groups, families and other guests. Suites will continue to gain popularity among business women, who prefer to have their beds out of sight during in-room meetings. The elderly will also respond to the advantages of suites since they generally spend more time in their hotel rooms. By the end of the century, it is estimated that a considerable proportion of single rooms will be converted to suites. Furthermore, a tremendous spurt in ~g 4 - Public Hearing LL! relation to Zoning, hotel guest,,,,~," new hotel construction can be forecast in order to replenish the reduced room supply caused by conversion of suites. Just as Club Med is identified with vacation villages and Harrah's with casino hotels the tendency to establish separate chains of suite- hotels will continue. Out-competing single room hotels, suite hotel facilities and space requirements will vary according to subtypes such as downtown, suburban, airport, luxury, resort, residential, and in seeming contradiction, a suite motel. Designed for price/value conscious guests mainly interested in good basic room but without many other amenities, this could become the most innovative suite type of all. After reading this, and hearing the comments here and the letters and other comments that I've received from people in the last couple of weeks on this, knowing that this was coming, I would like to see more study to be done by the Town Board on this. I have to agree with George Wetmore, when he says that we're not expert in this field. We have brought experts in to regard other issues, such as zoning, we've consulted with attorneys, and with other people in the area to help us in these areas, because the Town Board does not have that overall expertise in every area that we deal with. I would like to see as we have with the marina problems, not the marina problems, but the marina projects that have been discussed in front of the Code Committee. That we invite these people in and let them give us some first-hand information and documentation, because I feel that this is lacking, and before we go and restrict something, and cut off our nose to spite our faces. If we're going to encourage tourism out here, let's encourage tourism and do it realisticly. Thank you. SUPERVISOR MURPHY: Thank you, George. Any other Town Board members have any comments? COUNCILWOMAN LARSEN. Yes. I'd like to make a brief comment. Thank you, Frank. First of all, the economy, Mr. Wetmore, your reference to $265. per night. I think only about 18% of the population overall falls into the luxury rate. Many people that come to the North Fork are families, working class people. I'd like to accommodate the luxury people. There probably is a need for it to a certain extent. If you have money, you're rolling your fingers together, but I'd like to think that the middle class has been and always will be the backbone of the United States of America, and it's getting more and more difficult for middle class families to afford these vacations. We have a lot of second home owners out here, and we, also, have a lot of visitors who come for a night or two, and would like over- night accommodations and 475 feet is probably quite adequate to handle your average tourist. He said that people don't come out to the North Fork to watch the potatoes grow. Well, I happen to think that the potatoe farmers are one of the most wonderful assets that we have on the North Fork. You say that the fishing industry has gone down the tubes totally. Well, you don't know what's going to happen after the brown tide. I remember having conversations with you in the past, where you told me, Ellen, you want me to show you how high density on waterfront doesn't pollute. I'll take you to Ocean City, Maryland, where they have condominiums, eighty-'five tall, and the beach is beautiful. Since then I have gone to Ocean City, Maryland, and I would never want to see Southold Town look like that. I don't think the majority of the people that live here would want to see Southold Town look like that. Also, on motel units you're only allowed, I believe it's 30% lot cover- age for the unit, so it would be advantageous in my opinion to get as many units in as possible to accommodate the people who come out here who are day trippers. We get a lot of people from Suffolk County, Nassau County (tape change) opened with the ZBA as far as square footage, but they certainly go and allow 800 square feet. That's the size of a house almost. A vacation home is 800 square feet. So, hopefully, we can find something somewhere in the medium. I think that's all I want to say. I don't know about the Hilton Hotel in Hauppauge. I'm sure they have very small rooms in there, but we're not going to be accommodating business ?g 5 - Public Hearing LL ,~, relation to Zoning, hotel gues~ woman, who are out here for conferences. This is a vacation area. Thank you. SUPERVISOR MURPHY: Thank you, Ellen. Anyone else like to make a comment? COUNCILWOMAN COCHRAN: The only comment I would like to make in reference to 18%, and only for the wealthy, I disagree with this fact. It's a well known fact from a federal level, one of the things that is keeping our economy up is the recreation dollar that is being spent across the United States. There are many, many people, if you want to use the term, quote middle class, who are spending their money. Money is not exactly an issue on vacations and spending. When I was down in Disney World, I don't think there's any place in the world that can be as expensive as Disney World here in Florida, and you saw people of all levels, and it's quite easy to assess individuals in relation to their way of dress and different things. You can be wrong, but a general overall view. I think that we've been need of hotel units for quite some time. Yes, we have. I don't debate that. The size, you've given me some food for thought. I know approximately what 600 square works out to and in my mind, hey, that's a pretty good size room, but the way motels nowadays are changing, if they are here there are people that would utilize them, not only for vacations, but also for conferences. I'd also agree, if it's there, you will have business woman use them. You will have businessmen. You will have small meetings. You see more and more in your hotels, areas built for the small meeting in addition to the bedroom, so I've mixed feelings on it, George. I do, but my mind certainly is open, and I would like to see more study done on it. I think it needs more looking at. GEORGE WETMORE: In relationship to what Ellen said, see we have a lot of little rooms out there now. We need a couple of really 'nice places to draw them, and then if they want to come back on their own, or whatever, or with someone else, they have the smaller ones, the cheaper ones. And secondly, in the off season, no, it's not too good for a night. Let's say if it was a one bedroom suite or a two bedroom suite, they do go broke. But a two bedroom suite in the off-season will probably be about $145.00, and a one bedroom would be about $105.00. If you had a motel room, it would be $65.00. COUNCILWOMAN LARSEN: I think it's a successful operation is a combination of all of it, not... GEORGE WETMORE: Well, you see we have the older little units, and they are much cheaper. I think Jack gets one hundred bucks a night, even in the middle of the summer, so that's always available. That's the same size, I believe as the North Fork. They're very small rooms. Not the bigger ones, that he built down the road. COUNCILWOMAN COCHRAN: No,the motel itself. The long ones. COUNCILWOMAN OLIVA: Soundview. First of all, he requires two nights and I think they're $150 to $160 a night. GEORGE WETMORE: Yeah, he..that's before list last year. He never had vacancies, so he had it up there, and we were actually getting his overflow. But last year was the first time he ever had vacancies. That's why he can demand a two night miniumum, because he was guaranteed to fill up. This year, hopefully, although we never had a medical waste problem out here, and we slandered by the westender, and lost a h--- of a lot of trade. I think you understand the objective of what has to happen. We have to have three to five really nice resorts, and then ti~ afterstructure that's already here will renevate to some extent, upgrade their units, ~g 6 - Public Hearing LL ~=,.relation to Zoning, hotel guest.~-,I and everything will grow together, not massively, just on a limited basis, but it will be enough to help the local economy survive, and right now the local economy is putso. COUNCILWOMAN COCHRAN: It's not good. SUPERVISOR MURPHY: Thank you, George. Is there anyone else who would like to address? COUNCILMAN PENNY: Just one further comment. This article also, relates suite unit area standards in square feet, and they address moderate at 475, upscale at 590, and deluxe at 700. So there is a range established by the industry, and probably we could address that range, and not limit it to any one size. My second comment would be is that in the supportive work that was done in the background of the Master Plan one of the goals of the Master Plan was to promote industry out here particularly in the tourist area. What can we do to encourage it year round? Now you can't expect people to be coming out here to go snowmobiling because we don't have anything like that to attract them in the winter. The idea was to try to attract businesses so maybe we could have small convention areas, and business seminars out here in a very rural setting. This would help in these areas, because units could be tailored to the convention center type approach, and bring people out here, and I think by limiting them to severely at this time, I think we're going to lose that, and that was one of the goals in the Master Plan. Thank you. COUNCILWOMAN OLIVA: George, as we discussed this at length, I think, at Commerce and Industry Committee, last Wednesday night, just how will we keep the peoole here, and why would they come in the fall. arid the winter. We were looking at- 'different things, that we codli:l.do~: so haYe an open mind. GEORGE WETMORE: Basically in the fall and winter, you know its the peace and tranquility, and just getting away from the rat race. It's beautiful sitting there and just looking over the water, and the Sound always changes. It's never the same, and getting to what George says, you may have one fellow for an all suite and they would be up to 750 square feet. Who knows, or basically competition demands size. The other thing is sometimes the build a combination of one bedroom and two bedrooms. Usually it's recommended that 30% of them be one bedroom, so you go from that. SUPERVISOR MURPHY: Okay, anyone else like to comment on this proposed Local Law? (No response.) I'll close the public hearing. -'Judith T. Terry. Southold Town Clerk NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON LOCAL LAW . PUBLIC NOTICE IS HERE- Gl~t EN th.a~ there has been i; . i presented to the Town Board of il; '" the Town of Southold, Suffolk ~ii' County, New York, on the llth .' day of April; 1989 aLocalLaw i';:.' entitl~d, "A. Lo~ai Law in Rela- .... tion to Zoning!' 'ii':i .NOTICE IS. FURTHER i~i: ,' GIVEN t'hat the Town Board of ,;~: ,the Town of Southold will~ hold t! , ;a public heanng on the aforesaid iI~' Local Law at the Southoid Town l[!':,HaIl Main Road Southold ::: New York, on the 23rd day o£ fi~ May, 1989 at 3:30 o;c ock P.M, ~[ at which time all interested per- ii,:' sons will be h6a!d,. L: . I Thi: p;op.:,.ed ' L,:,c ~i I.a,~ ,n '"q" ' ',-, ,'- BE IT EN.-'U:"E- ,, l-own.of Southold as follows ' ',~, I. Chapter 100 (Zoning) of the ::' Code of the Town of S'outhold :',"' 'is hereby amended as follows: '. 'l. Section 100-61.B(4) is :~,i. hereby amen'ded by adding {::' read as .foll0wsi 'i ' (e) The maximum size of · ii. the guest unit shall be s x hun- '!:.,tired (60{)) square feet.' i:i 11. Thfs Local Law shall take : ;' effect' upon its fifin~ with the ~; 'Secretary of Stat~. · ii:' Copies of this Local Law are i available in the.Office of the OAi-ED ,~17. 9 I,:~$c~ ;ir i JUDITH T. TERRY ':':qlSOUTHOLD!'TOWN CLERK ~ ~i !' '".' ': .... IX,' 5/t8/89 (I). COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, says that she is the Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in said Long Island Traveler-Watchman once each week for .................... ./ ...... weeks successively, commencing on the ...~ ...... d.C..~7.' ...... d/oa,y"6'~..~. , ]9 ~'Y (~ Sworn to before me this ..................... day of ...... .......... , ?? Notary Public ROT,~R:' ?L!~L!C, S~._--.~.s af ;law York NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON LOCAL LAW · i:'PUBLilC NOTICE IS HEREBY :: GIVEN that there has been presented ~ ~o the Town Board o£ the Town of :,outhold, Suffolk County New h j .York. on the 11 th day of Ap~I, 198 ~ in Relation to Zoning." NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the Town Board of the Town of Southold wgl hold a public healing on the aforesaid Local Law at the Sonthold Town Hall, Main Road, Soathotd, New Yoi'~ on the 23rd day ::.i' of May, 1989, at 3:30 o'clock p~rn., This proposed ~Loca/LawM.Re_ ;";: latinn ro Zordag" reads as foUow~, ~ vat: BE IT ENACTED by the T0qmii~ :,Board of the Tows of Southold a~ I. Chapter 100 (Zoning) of th~ I,~ Code of the Town of Southold is !I]" Immby amended as follows: 1. Section 100-61.B (4) is hereby amended by adding thereto a new sub~ection ' ~ read as follows: (e).The ma.~mam size of the guest unit. shall'. b~ six hmadred (600) squar~ feet, Il. This Local Law shall take'effect upon its filing with the Secr~tazy . of State, ?¢'Copies of this LocaI Law are ~vailable in the Office of the Town :~iClerk to any mtere, sted 1~ OhS during __ii!business hours, ~: DATED: May 9, 1989. SOUTHOLD TOWN CLtLq, K STATE OF NEW YORK) ") SSi' COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) R1 al no l~o~.q Of Mattituck, in said Counbj, being duly sworn, says that he/she is Principal clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a Weekly'Newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County Suffolk and State of Hew' York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for l weeks successively, commencing on the 18Lh day of' Ma-y -1~89 Principal Clerk