The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTR-8440A John M.Bredemeyer III,President � S® y®� Town Hall Annex Michael J.Domino,Vice-President �® ® 54375 Route 25 P.O.Box 1179 Glenn Goldsmith Southold,New York 11971 A.Nicholas Krupski ® �O� Telephone(631) 765-1892 Charles J.Sanders '00UNTi Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE # 1240C Date: June 22, 2016 THIS CERTIFIES that the demolition of the existing dwelling, add fill and rewade the area, At 12400 New Suffolk Avenue, Cutcho ague Suffolk County Tax Map#1000-116-6-12 Conforms to the application for a Trustees Permit heretofore filed in this office Dated May 8, 2014 pursuant to which Trustees Administrative Permit#8440A Dated June 18, 2014,was issued and conforms to all of the requirements and conditions of the applicable provisions of law. The project for which this certificate is being issued is for the demolition of the existing dwelling add fill and regrade the area. The certificate is issued to EDITH &TODD FREED owners of the aforesaid property. Pte- *Vl� &01 .ate Authorized Signature John M. Bredeme er III, President ;y,�oSUFFol,�co Town Hall Annex Michael J. Domino, Vice-President � �� Gyj}, 54375 Route 25 Glenn Goldsmith N z " P.O. Box 1179 A. Nicholas Krupski �,, Southold, NY 11971 Charles J. Sanders Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DATE OF INSPECTION: AZ `}/6 Ch. 275 Ch. 111 INSPECTION SCHEDULE Pre-construction, hay bale line/silt boom/silt curtain 1St day of construction '/ constructed __�Z_ Project complete, compliance inspection. INSPECTED BY: A KILO- COMMENTS: C rad CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: John M. Bredemeyer Ill, President g�FFO(,�c Town Hall, 53095 Main Rd. Michael J. Domino,Vice-President �� OV__ P.O. Box 1179 James F. King W Southold,NY 11971 c' 631hone Charles J. Sanders y,�� Telephone( )765-1892 Dave Bergen Ol �� Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK, TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND POSSIBLE REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. INSPECTION SCHEDULE Pre-construction, hay bale line 1St day of construction % constructed Project complete, compliance inspection John M.Bredemeyer III,President kSU(/jiyo Town Hall Annex Michael J. Domino,Vice-President �� l0 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 James F. King,Trustee Southold,New York 11971-0959 Dave Bergen,Trustee G Q Telephone(631) 765-1892 Charles J.Sanders,Trustee �< cou�m Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Permit No.: 8440A Date of Receipt of Application: May 8, 2014 Applicant: Edith & Todd Freed SCTM#: 116-6-12 Project Location: 12400 New Suffolk Avenue, Cutchogue Date of Resolution/Issuance: June 18, 2014 Date of Expiration: June 18, 2016 Reviewed by: Board of Trustees Project Description: For the demolition of the existing dwelling, add fill and re- grade the area. Findings: The project meets all the requirements for issuance of an Administrative Permit set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code. The issuance of an Administrative Permit allows for the operations as indicated on the survey prepared by John T. Metzger, Land Surveyor, last dated May 6, 2014, and stamped approved on June 18, 2014. Special Conditions: None Inspections: Final Inspection. If the proposed activities do not meet the requirements for issuance of an Administrative Permit set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, a Wetland Permit will be required. This is not a determination from any other agency. John M. Bredemeyer III, President Board of Trustees 0 09 John Bredemeyer, President \p%UFFOIt Town Hall Annex Michael J. Domino, Vice-President °° ° 54375 Route 25 James F. King P.O. Box 1179 Charles J. Sanders • Southold, NY 11971 Dave Bergen o1 ,� �aTelephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection/Work Session Report Date/Time: � r C r Patricia C. Moore, Esq. on behalf of EDITH & TODD FREED request an Administrative Permit for the demolition of the existing dwelling, add fill and re-grade the area. Located: 12400 New Suffolk Avenue, Cutchogue. SCTM# 116-6-12 Type of area to be impacted: Saltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland SoundBay Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: Chapt.275 Chapt. 111 other Type of Application: Wetland Coastal Erosion Amendment Administrative Emergency Pre-Submission Violation Notice of Hearing card posted on property: Yes No Not Applicable Storm Water Management Review: Yes No Not Applicable Info needed: Modifications: Conditions:_ �� `ty Cc_t r t- cej P Present Were: ',-J. Bredemeyer —M. Domino �J. King _:�C. Sanders Bergen Bay Constable Other Form filled out in the field by - e.6. Mailed/Faxed to: Date: Scott A. Russe � °S� 'r J*es A. Richter, R.A. SUPERVISOR Michael M. Collins P.E. SOUTHOLD TOWN HALL-P.O.Box 11790 53095 Main Road-SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK 11971 Telephone#: (631)-765-1560 ?,� Fax#: (631)-765-9015 MICHAEL.COLLINS@TOWN.SOUTHOLD.NY.US > JAMIE. UTHOLD.NY.US Office of the Engineer D E�QIF " Town of Southold J' LMY - 8 2014STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CONTROL PLANVAR SHEEr ( TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICAN _,.. ._ PLEASE NOTE: All Contact&Project Information Requested by this FORM is Nessary for a Complete Application. APPLICANT. (Property Owner,Design Professional,Agent,Contractor,Other) PROPERTY OWNER (if Different from Applicant) NAME: /�i l�Vi/� Y .ef�l NAME: J`Ccme ADDRESS. / 200 'SI-A,A»w- , f ADDRESS: AZY ,002-9 Telephone Number: a,**'-,-&.Z I#a&v 71PJ'JI330 Telephone Number: Completed Applications can be picked up at the Engineering Department after being notified by the Department,or; it can be Mailed to the Applicant with the submission of a Self Addressed 8.5"x 11" Envelope& Appropriate Postage. DATE: a_ / Property Address/ Location of Construction Work: SCTM *: 1000 District Section Block Lot Required Documents for Stormwater Review: Copy of Complete Building Permit Application. Stormwater Management Control Plan. (2 Sets) Note: SMCP's are required whenever Grading or Excavations exceed 5,000 S.F,when New Impervious Surfaces are created,and/or when existing Raaf Systems,Driveways,Patios or other Impervious Surfaces are Re-Surfaced. De Minimis Projects will NOT be Subject to the Submission of a SMCP During the Stormwater Review! Note: These Projects would be Limited to Interior Renovations,Replacement of exterior Doors&Windows,Deck Construction with Loose Fit Decking, Installation and/or Modification of Mechanical Systems or other similar Work. A Complete Description of the Scope of Work Proposed under the Building Permit Application. A Completed Sto ter Revie Checklist. If No or NA are Indicated, Justification is Required. ** * FOR I E RING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY **** Reviewed By: Date: prove dd' ional Information Required: ,0SII1FQIr CHAPTER 236 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CONTROL PLAN CHECK LIST a DATE: APPLICANT: (Property Owner,Design Professional,Agent,Contractor,Other) O NAME: �l S C T M #: 1�000t Section Block Lot Telephone Number: S M C P -Plan Requirements: The applicant must provide a Complete Explanation and/or validation of all Information Required by this Checklist if it has not been provided! 1. A Site Plan drawn to scale Not Less that 60'to the inch MUST YE NO NA If You answered No or NA to any Item, Please Provide Justification Here! show all of the following items: If you need additional room for explanations, Please Provide additional Pa a. Location&Description of Property Boundaries b. Total Site Acreage. c. Existing-Natural& Man Made Features within 500 L.F. of the Site Boundary as required by§236-17(cx2). d. Test Hole Data Indicating Soil Characteristics&Depth to Ground Water. e. Limits of Clearing&Area of Proposed Land Disturbance. f. Existing& Proposed Contours of the Site (Minimum z Intervals) g. Location of all existing& proposed structures, roads, driveways,sidewalks, drainage improvements& utilities. h. Spot Grades& Finish Floor Elevations for all existing& proposed structures. I. Location of proposed Swimming Pool and discharge ring. 11 IF-V- )Vofbol J. Location of proposed Soil Stockpile Area(s). ✓ k. Location of proposed Construction Entrance/Staging Area(s). 1. Location of proposed concrete washout area(s). V 'Sm'4 Rmoo'" 0 C44' m. Location of all proposed erosion&sediment control measures. 2. Stormwater Management Control Plan must include Calculations showing that the stormwater improvements are sized to capture,store,and infiltrate on-site the run-off from all impervious surfaces generated by a two(21 inch rainfall/storm event. 3. Details&Sectional Drawings for stormwater practices are required for approval. Items requiring details shall include but not be limited to: a. Erosion &Sediment Controls. V0 b. Construction Entrance&Site Access. c. Inlet Drainage Structures (e.g.catch basins,trench drains,etc.) d. Leaching Structures (e.g.infiltration basins,swales,etc.) FORM * SWCP Check List-TOS JAN 2014 John M. Bredemeyer III, President Of�'t Town Hall Annex Michael J. Domino, Vice-President AQ 54375 Route 25 James F. King P.O. Box 1179 Charles J. Sanders Southold, NY 11971 o� Telephone(631)765-1892 1 Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 28, 2014 Ms. Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: TODD FREED & EDITH WEBSTER-FREED 12400 NEW SUFFOLK AVENUE, CUTCHOGUE SCTM# 116-6-12.1 Dear Ms. Moore: The Southold Town Board of Trustees reviewed the survey dated December 3, 2013, and determined the proposed dwelling and sanitary system are out of the Wetland jurisdiction under Chapter 275 of the Town Wetland Code and Chapter 111 of the Town Code. Therefore, in accordance with the current Wetlands Code (Chapter 275)and the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area (Chapter 111) no permit is required. Please be advised, however, that no construction, sedimentation, or disturbance of any kind may take place seaward of the tidal and/or freshwater wetlands jurisdictional boundary or seaward of the coastal erosion hazard area as indicated above, or within 100' landward from the top of the bluff, without further authorization from the Southold Town Board of Trustees pursuant to Chapter 275 and/or Chapter 111 of the Town Code. It is your responsibility to ensure that all necessary precautions are taken to prevent any sedimentation or other alteration or disturbance to the ground surface or vegetation within Tidal Wetlands jurisdiction and Coastal Erosion Hazard Area, which may result from your project. Such precautions may include maintaining adequate work area between the tidal wetland jurisdictional boundary and the coastal erosion hazard area and your project or erecting a temporary fence, barrier, or hay bale berm. 2 This determination is not a determination from any other agency. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, d"t— my% Aa^?A".M John M. Bredemeyer III, President Board of Trustees JMB:amn JONI "INMET ADDRESS: '2400 NEW SUFFOLK AVENUE_ '"SURVEY OF PROPERTY N AT CUTCHOGUE ( " TOWN OF SOUTROLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N•Y• 1000-ue-00-12 n*, SCALA 1•=90• 5£PTOI'a S.1012 ALY 2,2016 S. R e.a.N) i. sEpTDIem e,2013(VC.WNS) ar� sEPTDIYYEF 10.2013((LOC.N:CLWS&) .v ATT NOVEMBER 22.013 ((SETBACK EACH L LOC.TREES) DECEMBER J.2013(EOOE(li BEACH MCS) GRADING PLAN "*�n NyE (%IqM' (VAC4NT) _ WA1ER py sa I1.srr�a+r•r""�m �`� _ mq ar aTREE>) "••/4' a 1r r�iL •I..r F� fi ad An. as ~wq� `1471, u4Vry nLt fl p 1: `�. �I��_Y' W f PA x r f EB 1 8 2014 PROPOSED SEPTIC SYSTEM N.Ts. •°�' '4101 LL r. q� 1 B rt �_� PA� aT _ (2)(5)POOL CLUSTERS OF 10'DIAMETER r 2'DEEP I 2 o✓L""'° LEACHING POOLS _ 11J 2.WO GALLON CYLINDRICAL SEPTIC TANK 10'DIAMETER WITH A 4'LIQUID DEPTH 1 TO BE BUILT TO SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ) HEAL TN SER HCES SPE'CInCATIONS EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM TO REMOVED IN ACCORDANCE WITI1 SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMFNI OF HEAL-H SPECIFICATIONS. n �\ n' I L ' tsry.J J / ,N ��io11 (bnOtLNo Er Y� _ f °�euc wA�rIN I � • S w 1��N � �'�/ ��♦ �LaLs1 3 1 +L�. Y \� _J ♦,r FLOOD ZONE FROM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 14 rLw_e, E MAP NUMBER 36103C0501H SEPTEMBER 25,2009 R y4 pY P ELEVATIONS REFERENCED TO N.A.V.D. 1988 CERTIFIED TO: ANY AL7ERA77QV OR AOaOHV To Rea SURKY/S A NLYA TOMTODD FREED OF sac 72090E INE NEW YORK S7A/E 0LICAWIN LAM. �p S?L,�, �vy� EDITH WEBSTER FREED ENcEPT AS PER sLcnaN 7200-9/BON SIGN 2 ALL CERRt1CA7mS -A ADVOCATES ABSTRACT INC''ADA2 -S NKREOV ARE VAUD FOR 0X5 MAP AND COWS"MWOr ONLY r STEWART TITLE INSURANCE C SAID MAP OR COATS HEAR nLE AIPRE'SSM SEAL OF INE SURWYCR �»') YWLOm SK97A T1.RE APPEARS HVWGN TEST HOLE DATA 9t T.mer +c Nam/OSTR with the STANDARDS FOR APPROVAL By McDONA111 6EOBCKNLE AND CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSURFACE SEWAGE e/t+rs DISPOSAL.SYSTEMS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES o..e and will abide by the conditions set forth therein and on the ^N""gM11°"' a permit to construct 1...w axr a4o .c r The location of wells and cesapods shown hereon are Bawl r.e.rr.s 4111 NO. 49618 flan red observations and or from data obtained tram others. to a1, PTcem SuRvr1mW P.C. PARCEL I AREA-50M 80.FT.TO 7SE P.0.1 )BOA 9D92D FAX(637)765-1797 E L PARCEL 2 AREA-M,748 80.FT.TO TE LINE ■-MONUMENT 1230 TRAVELER STREET ,r SOU7HOLA N.Y. 11977 1�-240 Town Ha Annex James F.King,President O��Q�Sl7UTy� 54375 Main Road Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President P.O.Box 1179 Dave Bergen 4 4 Southold,New York 11971-0959 John Bredemeyer H Telephone(631)765-1892 Michael J.DominoFax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE #0871 C Date: MY 8,2013 THIS CERTIFIES that the regular maintenance of established foot path which includes spreading out of woodgWps alon the ath At 12400 New Suffolk Avenue Cutchogi e,New York Suffolk County Tax Map# 116-6-12.1&12.2 Conforms to the application for a Trustees Permit heretofore filed in this office Dated May 1,2013 pursuant to which Trustees Administrative Permit#8178A Dated May 15,2013,was issued and conforms to all of the requirements and conditions of the applicable provisions of law. The project for which this certificate is being issued is for the regular maintenance of established foot path which includes spreading out of woodchips along the path. The certificate is issued to TODD FREED owner of the aforesaid property. uthorized Signa re ee James F.King,President so yo Town Hall Annex Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President 54 Main Road P..O.O.Box 1179 Dave Bergen Southold,New York 11971-0959 John Bredemeyer H • �� Telephone(631)765-1892 Michael J.Domino � Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Permit No.: 8178A Date of Receipt of Application: May 1, 2013 Applicant: Todd Freed SCTM#: 116-6-12.1 & 12.2 Project Location: 12400 New Suffolk Avenue, Cutchogue Date of Resolutionlissuance: May 15, 2013 Date of Expiration: May 15, 2015 Reviewed by: Dave Bergen, Trustee Project Description: For regular maintenance of established foot path which includes spreading out woodchips along the path. Findings: The project meets all the requirements for issuance of an Administrative Permit set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code. The issuance of an Administrative Permit allows for the operations as indicated on the project plan prepared by Todd Freed, received on May 1, 2013, and stamped approved on May 15, 2013. Special Conditions: None Inspections: Final Inspection. If the proposed activities do not meet the requirements for issuance of an Administrative Permit set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, a Wetland Permit will be required. This is not a determination from any other agency. James F. King, President Board of Trustees APPROVED 3Y BOARD OF TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PMR DATE Af,9y ,s a�i3 � f a � a+r . �r warr Fit x� Na A 4TM �i CY 91r �7 1 � ��cp sMtittAe��e� p E E I V E Tr°.�p A CERTSIED TO: MAY - 1 2013 ' " u.� EFREED � ADVOCATES ABS STEWART TITLE I James F.King,President O`�►trAT S�uT/yO Town Hall Annex 54 Main Road Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President P.O..Box 1178 Dave Bergen Southold,New York 11971-0959 John Bredemeyer d2 Telephone(631)766-1892 Michael J.Domino Fax(631) 765-6641 _Yf'•5 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 8, 2013 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: TODD & EDITH WEBSTER-FREED 12400 NEW SUFFOLK AVENUE, CUTCHOGUE SCTM# 116-6-12.1 & 12.2 Dear Ms. Moore: The Southold Town Board of Trustees reviewed the survey prepared by Peconic Surveyors, P.C., last dated September 6, 2013, and performed a Field Inspection on November 6, 2013 to flag the landward edge of the jurisdictional boundary line and determined that any proposed tree/stump/underbrush activity located landward of this flagging is out of the Wetland jurisdiction under Chapter 275 of the Town Wetland Code and Chapter 111 of the Town Code. Therefore, in accordance with the current Wetlands Code(Chapter 275)and the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area(Chapter 111) no permit is required. Please be advised, however, that no construction, sedimentation, or disturbance of any kind may take place seaward of the tidal and/or freshwater wetlands jurisdictional boundary or seaward of the coastal erosion hazard area as indicated above, or within 100' landward from the top of the bluff,without further authorization from the Southold Town Board of Trustees pursuant to Chapter 275 and/or Chapter 111 of the Town Code. It is your responsibility to ensure that all necessary precautions are taken to prevent any sedimentation or other alteration or disturbance to the ground surface or vegetation within Tidal Wetlands jurisdiction and Coastal Erosion Hazard Area, which may result from your project. Such precautions may include maintaining adequate work area between the tidal wetland jurisdictional boundary and the coastal erosion hazard area and your project or erecting a temporary fence, barrier, or hay bale berm. 2 A copy of the survey with the approximate location of the flagging performed by the Board of Trustees is enclosed for your records. This determination is not a determination from any other agency. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, c James F. King, sident Board of Trustees JFK:eac i STREET ADDRESS: 12400 NEW SUFFOLK AVENUE N SURVEY OF PROPERTY AT CUTCHOGUE ( ;TM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD wa SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. WA") SCAM 1*-W SEPIEMBER 6.20112 IV AJLY 2.2013(TOPO Z BQH) .14 SEPTEMBER 6.2013(REWS10M) r n4aNn d PARCEL I +t �! 11 P ! ARCrL4 1 LLV 11 L !1 � 11 1 !i I !r �(rr Y/ IY rDeE(L1NC r l PUO Iw�atia 11 /r •F / I 2 20•x' 1! q a ri'•L �! �t>�c IRiN p RL1� t Il O r��Aa 11 1114°• faa• l i491 a•.r 4a1 1� 11 a FR ji I1 J ff/ � e YJ6k� T3 �t �1 I Hfa. 811 IS Nov -4 101 \\ N � �JJ.III ISL \�� frr _!y,_ FLOOD ZONE FROM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP b awa 4 W 7 MAP NUMBER 36103CO501H SEPTEMBER 25,2009 ELEVATIONS REFERENCED TO N.A.V.D.1986 aaq�A TT�T,. CERTIFIED D ED AHS ALIEIEADLW F IW NEN M Tres STAEYES el A wLAW. '�88. TODD FREED OF SECEXCEPT AS 51?SE N NEW-SUS SrAPAS EOUCAIKW uw �r `LItY�1V m„0., EDITH WEBSTER FREED EXCEPT AS PlVA ID FOR 720P-ST/OWN90N Z ALL M'Or AIL/IONS .'(S• Wrp ADVOCATES ABSTRACT INC COMPANY OF NEW SAID tI ARE VALID FOR IRLS NAP ANO W SE TFIFRER ONLY 6 SAID MAP 414 COPIES FEAR 1tlE IAtlIPES3Ea SIAL OF'IM SMN:YTiP STEWART TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 1� _ tMET= �I' IW om lwnAio it STANDARDS FOR APPROVAL TEST HOLE DATA .f QFA AND CONSIRUCIION OF SUBSURFACE SEWAGE By MoO0N�1�303pENCE 1V DISPOSAL SYSTEMS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES and will abide by the conditions set forth therein and an the r permit to construct '�oex am N� Mx eeN9 The location of wells and cesspools shown hereon oro sour awn Ire anlo>P ham Aeld observations and or ham data obtained ham others. C.NO. 49618 a Lr ar P£CONIC SURVEYORS P.C. PARCH I AREA-M50 80.FT.TO TE LINE w lu w rn L eerw,.e woo (631)765-5010 FAX(631)765-1797 PARCEL 2 AA-14,748 80.FE TO TE LINE 1230�TRA9i E RER STRE£r ■MONUMENT tY SOUTHOLD,N.Y. 11971 12-240 + ,j�'+k,d'� ��, �-`' i-• $''fC'�`'..p �R,.d Y�''-�yt�i�:6 '+�' �r.*. �.t' �„s`fi,i�, � ..r. JLI"b �' �x_.xv p� .,a ^F�k. �'a `X ' y��l •ry+ 1�� e. r � ' • a' � '�✓x.+_' �' +" a /�*.-_�. r. fi " .a�r+ vii '4�e�„:..c�c�'"';�'E��.°��a-�- ,-y`+7i�/ 4 �'.. r r v �. . _ a� has ��: . �+ •.` rg �'� kit e a� y� ` �� ki,ro_- .e „�., "��,,��+ .t "�"`�'�� r�� '<.{.�^'; ':�...a '� kir ga�'a� �y �.'�.'�.�.+ge aR� � ��. f'•'- 'i.., 1; Ft r r ,x 2 > " dam - .,��,�,,.�•. -� � ;,. ., ,'� � °'''. _ 2 �.. a�� r j r w IL >.;» - «wu•A♦ ., " .< ,.,.. 1�� : ."fes`"+�,..rrr i.y (`. ». .!.'�Y xrV4i& .v ryK J got � y , sL � jj .r wr ^ey. t♦� LATCH rEE SEc No.>m ----2--_---T--Z— -----Z------- --------�—__---_—,NE wTp,--------rZ---------- —�uxE tn6x� � SEE PCL NO. FOR PCL NO. •s 2 j naxe R I I aff ate.No. affaEc.No. ,xxx•5xe, W I N mmxx my o0 0 6tNe ]aNcl I 2] Z t / t . SUNcI 15 m ma;m� 2a I To... awq I`—,.—•. � /�9G�° i � .,a aa.N ; sa,een..nwxeF.cNn F � / v, w I O • I e ,aw aP �•. ' 1 •w4 2bV4 i IKxm,oln ax `: \ / b f I I z.,xtq tq � ...\.. s g x csE x•n O a �s •\ F \... tz,� °" •i ` i xvFeaK 2x',,14 (�.. ,own Wo�sgo,,,txxn\ � \ �:./ \ � __..�i -`� 2svq � ._2��• $ s e , � zxe zu '\ j: \ a, • u \ ,. mO• I alNc tWclr @ • e e 2 , z/EA ew\'f� g a a ,.Wq ♦., I CUTCMOOIIE � x ♦ ]xayq \...( 1 ♦ e.eNc�' ,1Nc1 1.Ncl,.W4 ,b ,.♦N4 2W4 ,5 tit 1 f ,a r c I• P,Ra Ow6P]RCi 5 t^ � Y ,Wq ♦ .]NU . �—'� � e,.,Nc t 11Nc1 ,e �\ t. '� 5 .•rx.• �'' ✓ ./ t O I '92 \ •b Kx 6�6 a 114, ,., tsNq .• s ^8 f 11 e4 • o� ,...\ \...�...;x• x e .yµ,4 ,.'silo a `` ~ PECONIC \...\-�.._J - .L.�\•\ ` •Wy J�1 J b �xtN4 t,1a L.D.45 F.D.29 m:Qc^ 0. 9FE3EC.xO.t,S \PO Qo 5.Wc1 / L t.. ,.. — -- --a— ..r,.. --^-- NOTICE COUNTY OF SUFFOLKaOUTNOLO © ff SECTION NO E r..e.�•... —�— .. Ot) _ u�,� --r-- r --.-- K O t....t.� --_--_ �..., _ Q u ---- t..--..-- •w".x•Nc,lnaeeR v.xaN i,y�_ Real Property Tax Service Age^c7 H....,,.. -•-- '� --- v.... t---" .N... Y�'�Jx%7 «.xFx...R•,RN...N.,,«,- N� 116 PROPERTY MRP OFFICE LOCATION: O��QF SOUryOI MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex h O P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 l Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) y Southold, NY 11971 Q Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: John Bredemeyer, President JUN 1 5 2014 Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: June 16, 2014 Re: Proposed Wetland Permit for EDITH &TODD FREED SCTM# 1000-116-6-12 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. on behalf of EDITH &TODD FREED request an Administrative Permit for the demolition of the existing dwelling, add fill and re-grade the area. Located: 12400 New Suffolk Avenue, Cutchogue. SCTM# 116-6-12 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the Policy Standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. NOTE: It is recommended that the Board have the applicant clarify the elevations of graded soils to determine if any off site impacts could occur. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney I James F.King,President 0f so(/jy Town Hall Annex � Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President ,`�� 54375 Main Road I P.O.Box 1179 =. Dave Bergen >�[ Southold,New York 11971-0959 j John Bredemeyer eis Q p Telephone(631)765-1892 I Michael J.Domino Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD { i Office Use Only JCoastal Erosion Permit Application F Wetland Permit Application Administrative Permit Amendment/Transfe ension eceived Application: MAY - 8 2014 .. eceived Fee:$ VCompleted Application -• } _Incomplete Juin[{�uir C:,d SEQRA Classification: —Type I Type II Unlisted Coordination:(date sent) LWRP Consistency Assessment Form L-215h 'AC Referral Sent: _Date of Inspection: Receipt of CAC Report: _Lead Agency Determination: f Technical Review:_ ublic Hearing Held: Le 4 Resolution: Name of Applicant Edith &Todd Freed Mailing Address 1200 5th Avenue NY NYPh one Number:( ) (212) 918-3625 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000- 116-6-12 Property Location: 12400 New Suffolk Ave. Cutchogue NY 11935 (provide LILCO Pole#,distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: Patricia C. Moore Esq. (If applicable) Address: 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Phone: (631) 765-4330 Bard of Trustees Applicatiol i . i GENERAL DATA Land Area(in square feet): 50,510 r-40 } . Area Zoning: Previous use of property: existing house, cottage and garage Intended use of property:_ demolition of existing house (Cofgc Lq�i'� ur,�l Sct»rl�+�ct�tc ;i�r�x�� i Covenants and Restrictions on property? Yes X No �1 If"Yes",please provide a copy. Will this project require a Building Permit as per Town Code? X Yes No If"Yes",be advised this application will be reviewed by the Building Dept.prior to a Board of Trustee review and Elevation Plans will be required. Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals? Yes X No If"Yes",please provide copy of decision. i ' Will this project require any demolition as per Town Code or as determined by the Building Dept.? x Yes No Does the structure(s)on property have a valid Certificate of Occupancy? X Yes No Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: i Agency Date NYSDEC pending No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permittapproval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? x No Yes If yes,provide explanation: Project Description(use attachments if necessary): demolition of existing dwelling within Trustee Jurisdiction...new house out of jurisdiction �rd of Trustees Application• L WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: demolition of existing house Area of wetlands on lot: 5,850 sq.ft, square feet Percent coverage of lot: 10 % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: 75' feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: 100 feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? i No X Yes If yes,how much material will be excavated? house cubic yards How much.material will be filled? regraded cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: 4' feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: gradual Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: bulldozer Statement of the effect,if any,on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations(use attachments if appropriate): none 617.20 Appendix B Short Environmental Assessment Form Instructions for Completing Part 1 -Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 -Project and Sponsor Information /p��wcc'Cca ,lf(�VSe �'Sa� ©V7- P/ UYisCf«�tr Name of Action or Project: Tock-/ J ¢ Ec4-,"i l ehs;k r d Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): a x/0'0 Alzw sv>f�fe-i4v-e,, da"07e.tle Brief Description of Proposed Action: 7� / atia�td�- ekisr Saxe t � �lot.45e ¢ 9 Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: d/ �� 2S %odd �r-"d �Ld,I-A Wehsk,- �74ad E-Mail: Address: City/PO: 'v. N State: Zip Code: A/ 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that Fx_1 El may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes, list agency(s)name and permit or approval: NY 5 Pe-L ❑ ❑ 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? /.5 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. / E]Urban E]Rural(non-agriculture) ❑Industrial ❑Commercial 21kesidential(suburban) 13 Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Aquatic ❑Other(specify): ❑Parkland Page l of 4 • 5. Is the proposed action, NO JESN/Aa. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? ❑b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? ❑6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: ��-i,� ^ �j��N ❑ ❑ 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? © ❑ c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? ❑ 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologic : Aln � --- ❑ 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: poh" `✓u- '� ❑ FV YNJ 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: � � J a�'u '``� 1 /y J1C�� ® ❑ 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? � ❑ b. Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? ® ❑ 13.a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? ❑ b. Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? ® ❑ If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: o ,r is 7�_o — 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: [EShoreline ❑Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional ® Wetland ❑Urban ❑Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? M ❑ 16. Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ©NO EJYES ❑ b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: - [R]NO AYES Page 2 of 4 0 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other Iiquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: © F] 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: � ❑ 20. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: _ ® ❑ I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsorya��e�-- cz Date: Signature: Part 2- Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part I and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning ❑ regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? ❑ 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? ❑ 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the ❑ establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or ❑ affect existing infrastructure for mass transit, biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate El available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: ❑ a.public/private water supplies? El LJ- b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, 1:1architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, ❑ waterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? ILI E] Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail,identify the impact,including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant. Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and cumulative impacts. Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. ® Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. 11!�/ I Name of Lead Agen y Date -��{ -6&& Print or Type,Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Si ur o onsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) PRINT Page 4 of 4 PATRICIA C. MOORE, AT-TORNEYWW FOLLY-UP DATE 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 (631) 765-4330 email- pcmoore@mooreattyS.Com.-` Date To JUN 1 8 2014 Subject P Pu Wrd(J T.,ij,C SIGNED El Please reply El No reply necessary Board of Trustees Application County of Suffolk State of New York TODD FREED AND EDITH WEBSTER-FREED, BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. Todd Freed Awga*j4� Edith Webster-Freed Sworn to before me this d day of 3i/VL , 2014 Notary Public DONNA G. FAGFRSTROM Notary Pi 'c.' c rtrate :.;f New York --7 6 5 Oua�iti :i=r County Commission Lzxpires iv ay 12, 2015 0 0 Board of Trustees Application County of Suffolk State of New York TODD FREED AND EDITH WEBSTER-FREED, BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S)AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF,AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION,I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. Todd Freed Edith Webster-Freed M Sworn to before me this ISworn to before me this 16th day of _1^4 , 2014 day of June, 2014 Notary Public Notary Public DONNA G. FAGERSTROMGARF WRIQFfl' NotaryP blit. Mate ,f New York Notary Public, State of Now�t No.30-4653780 J . /:, r 7 7765 Qualified in Nassau Coy* Qualif _ -.ipr County Certificate Filed in New York County Commission Expires May 12, 2015 Commission Expires December 31,20 C Todd Freed Edith Webster-Freed February 26, 2014 Patricia C. Moore 51020 Main Road Southold NY 11971 Dear Ms. Moore: We, Todd Freed&Edith Webster Freed, as owners of property located on 12400 New Suffolk Ave., Cutchogue(sctm: 1000-116-6-12), hereby authorize you to act as our agent regarding any and all applications with the Town of Southold Board of Trustees, the NYS DEC, and any other agencies. Very truly yours, Todd Freed Edith Webster Freed ii APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Couthoid's Code of Ethics vmhibits conflicts of interest on the pgdof town officers and grip& es Be txmwse of j this form ism vrovide information which alert the town of M dble conflic ts of hOere t and allow it to take whatever action is i n2gessary to avoid same. L YOUR NAME: Edith &Todd Freed r.�y�ua MIr p rit (Last name,first namc,.q»ddle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indieato the.other person's or company's name.) NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that.apply.) Tax grievance Building _ Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning i(• Other (if"Other",name the activity.) Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest"means a business, including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. ' YES NO X date and sign where indicated. lfyou answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and 1 I� Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person 4 Describe the relationship between yourself(the applieant/aggntImpresentative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided i The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check ail that apply): +' A)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B}the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(whet the applicant is not a corporation); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. ; DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP !i Submitted this day of?E�w -2W a?oiV I Si atttre `' f gn ntNarn N Form TS 1 i s i. 1' dog Town of Southold Erosion, Sedimentation A Storm-Water Run-off ASSESSMENT FORM PROPERTY LOCATION: S-c.TAL0: THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS MAY REQUIRE THE SUBMISSION OF A STORM-WATER,GRADING,DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN simn -015w-- -ro— CE tRTiFIED FE CERTIFIED-BY A DESIGN PROSS I AL I THE STATE OF NEW YORK. SCOPE OF WORK - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION rrEM# / WORK ASSESSMENT Yes No a. What Is the Total Area of the Project Parcels? I Will this Project Retain Al Storrs-Water Run-Off (Include Total Area of all Parcels located within ,�, Generated by a Two(2")Inch Rainfall on Site? the Scope of Work for Proposed Construction) (SF IAaes) (This item will include all run-off created by site Elb. What Is the Total Area of Land Clearing clearing and/or construction activities as well as all -- and/or Ground Disturbance for the proposed /5-A. Site Improvements and the permanent creation of construction a~ impervious surfaces.) PROVIDE BRIEF PROJECT'DESCRUMON (Protide Aaarlorral Pow as Needed) 2 Does the Site Plan and/or Survey Show Proposed Drainage Structures Indicating Size&Location?This v item shall include all Proposed Grade Changes and fa-- -- c�WM Slopes Controlling Surface Water Flow. 3 Does the Site Plan and/or Survey describe the eroslon and sediment control practices that will be,used to X ❑ control site erosion and storm water discharges. This Item must be maintained throughout the Entire � • t Construction Period. P 4 WTI)this Project Require any land Filling,Grading or f_ / Excavation where there is a change to the Natural (�0 V✓�1Nfi Z6ll Gy /!Oli(�P - Existing Grade Involving more than 200 Cubic Yards x _ of Material within any Parcel? 5 Will this Application Require Land Disturbing Activities j Encompassing an Area in Excess of Five Thousand (5,000 S.F.)Square Feet of Ground Surface? 6 Is there a Natural Water Course Running through the Site? is this Project within the Trustees jurisdiction Eli General DEC SWPPP Requirements: or within One Hundred(100')feet of a Wetland or Submission of a SWPPP is"ked for all Construction activities Involving sol Beach? disturbances of one(1)or more acres; including disturbances of less than one acre that 7 Will there be,site preparation on Existing Grade Stopes i are part of a larger common plan that will uki nately disturb one or more acres of land; Horizontal Distance? 6hduding Construction actiAss Involving soli a disturbances of less then re(1)acre where which Exceed Fifteen Vertical Rise to feet a �G the DEC has determined that a SPOES permit is required for storm waterdisehargea. One Hundred(100')of HHo (SWPPP's Shall most the Minimum Requirements of the SPDES General Permit 8 Will Driveways.Parking Areas or other Impervious ❑ _ for Storm Water Discharges from Construction activity-Perndt No.GP-0-10-001.) Surfaces be Sloped to Direct Stomt-Water Run-Off1.The SWPPP shag be prepared prior to the submittal of the NOT.The NOI shall be into and/or in the direction of a Town right-Of-wail submitted to the Department prior to the corvneraemant of construction activity. 2.The SWPPP shall'Paraiba the erosion and sedtnent control pmcdoas and where 9 Will this Project Require the Placement of Material, required,post-const storm water management practices that will be used and/or Removal of Vegetation and/or the Constrcilon of any constructed to reduce the partards in storm water discharges and to assure item Within the Town Right-of-Way or Road Shoulder compliance with the terms and conditions of this pemat In addition,the SWPPP shag Area?tmhm Imre wm xor tmiude t-r.mraaon a ori identify potential sources of pollution which may reasonably be expected to affect the YeM"t"°1°"'t asona quaRy of store water dlscttarges. NOTE: If Any Answer to Questions One through Nine Is Answered with a Cheek Mark 3.AN SWPPPs that require the post-constnotlon storm water management practice In a Box and to construction she disturbance In between 5,000 3A 61 Awe in oma component shag be prepared by a qualified Design Profeealonal Licensed in New York a Storm Water,Grading,Dminege&Erosion Control Plan Is Required by the Town of that is knowledgeable In the principles and Practices of Storm Water Management. Southold and Must be Submitted for Review Prior to Issuance of Any BuBcft Psmdt (NOTE: A Check Mark(./)endfor Ann er for each question Is Requtred for a Complete Appkation) S1 ATE OF NEW YORK, �v �/�L COUNTY OF.... ............. ....................SS That L........ ................being duly sworn,deposes and says that he/she is the applicant for Permit, • ••(Name of in*Adual eigrdng Document) And that he/she is the .............................................................. �9��r fPl4wter CanUacEor,A9anC Corporate Officer.etc.) Owner and/or representative of the Owner or Owners,and is drily authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application;that all statements contained in this.application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief;and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed herewith. Sworn to before me this; <... ...... day of.... `........ .......................240 No Pu ...... ........ d. Ngft Publi (Signature of Applicant) FOAM - 6-010 No.01 PE6130638 Oualified in Suffolk Counter,,, Commission Expires July 18,0w — Town of Southold i LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS I" 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. . 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list,policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area.(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer mast be explained in detail. listing both supporting and non-. supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be undertaken. i I A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's ' website(southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office,the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. E � � B. . DESCRIPTION OF SM AND PROPOSED ACTION D SCTM# 116-6-12 MAY - 8 2014 �. PROJECT NAME demolition The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response Town Board ❑ Planning Board❑ Building Dept. ❑ Board of Trustees 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate"response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g.capital ❑ construction,planning activity,agency regulation,land transaction) ❑ (b) Financial assistance(e.g.grant,loan,subsidy) (c) Permit,approval,license,certification: 0 Nature and extent of action: demolition of existing house within 100' of wetlands Location of action: 12400 New Suffolk Ave. Cutchogue Site acreage: 50.510 Present land use: existing house, cottage and garage Present zoning classification: r-40 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Edith &Todd Freed (b) Mailing address: 1200 5th Avenue NY NY (c) Telephone number:Area Code( ) (212) 918-3625 (d) Application number,if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No If yes, which state or federal agency? I C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space,makes efficient use of infrastructure,makes beneficial use of a coastal location,and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. X]Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable new house is consistent with Policies of LWRP Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III=Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 Not Applicable i. 1 i l Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See 4. LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria I: ❑ Nat Applicable Q Yes ❑ No }` t new house will conform to character of the area Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable _nPw hnusa mnrP than 1 nn' frnm watlands I Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria ® Yes ❑ No [—]Not Applicable conforming to all HD regulations Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Cx] ❑ ❑ Yes No Not Applicable consistent with LWRP R i Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. �. ❑ Yes E] No Q Not Applicable i i. Attach additional sheets if necessary C I.. Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. i ❑ Yes ❑ No Fxl Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ YeF] No® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary I WORKING COAST POLICI S Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III•—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. t ❑ Yes ❑ No X❑ Not Applicable j� I Attach additional sheets if necessary i Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters.See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. R Yes ❑ No❑ Not Applicable ' new structures conforming to setbacks of TC 275 f Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No F—X1 Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 Not Applicable PREPARED BY Pat Moore for Edith & Todd Freed 'TITLE AGENT DATE 2/27/14 (2- CHECK LIST FOR TRUSTEES APPLICATIONS: (AN ORIGINAL & 3) 1. Application( C & R'S, if any) typed detailed project description with dimensions (note..must be signed by owner, with notary) - 2. Transactional Disclosure (signed by owners & agent) MAY 8 2014 3. Short EAFBoird of Trustees 4. Authorization 5. LWRP ,�- 6. Survey (y7f Cl-o-h ° 7. Plans (",6 8. Photographs (e(e�t ?, ) 4.'4, 9. Stormwater form (last dated 6/10)- w/�P STREET ADDRESS: 12400 NEW SUFFOLK AVENUE SSV 'Y 10;x' P., ` ' ' ' 0UE TOO OF COUNTY, + ti/S'OIITHOL.D {°�LLINC SUFMK F..+ONT ,LSI. l . et lC WA 1000-116-06-12.1 r 12.2 SC+P'TEMBER 66, 2012 P(J&CI WA 0TH JULY 2, 2013 0OPO & .B.0,H) R� SEPTEMBER 6, 2013 (REVISIONS) • SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 (_LOC. VEGETATION) NOVEMBER 22, 2013 ('SETBACK LIMES & LOC. TREES) DEtEM'BER 3, 2013 (15 GE OF BEACH FLAGS) FEBRUARY 5, 2014 (PROPOSED HOUSE) rico FEBRUARY 11, 2014 (SEPTIC SYSTEM) �APR1L 24, 2014 (REVISIONS) ` GRADING PLAN an � � �aY s, 2014 fREV15lDNS1 POE (*PtlguC �' f VA CA F.F. FL. 1i.2a. 4' APPROVW fd TER 1fV STR1E r%V GRADE PIPE EL 1q' �E `DyfR GF C!F PA T� Ci N/37/Ff� ORAPE E.. 8' OA !1 r 405 , Nr.Eqd N1�$ I��NT 4/V a& I.E. SAL I.E. i !E - T FAA1C 6.75' i 7.256.5' r W ,�+ET UTk►ry t � ' J. rO MA ova t IS D CaMsw PROPOSED SEP77C SYSTEM N.T.S WA7EP EL. 1.4' 33,00, SAY - 8 2014 [2] (5) POOL CLUSTERS OF 10' DIAMETER x 2' DEEP Q•, ! C V; k' E - JiIUIC�iUvYfl LEACHING POOLS � ' •� : '' +A [1] 2,000 GALLON CYLINDRICAL SEPTIC TANK I 1 k 10' DIAMETER WITH A 4' L IQUiD DEPTH TO BE BUILT TO SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF __-- HEALTH SERVICES SPECIFICA TIONS I ED . EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM TO REMOVED IN ACCORDANCE w ' `� I 1 BOARD OF TRUSTEES i WITH SUFFOLK COUNTY 'DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SPECIFICATIONS. �' ^ ! WELL TO BE ABANDONDED,LOCATION UNKNOWN Tinw] OF SOUTHOI.D STORMWA TER MANAGEMENT CONTROL PI AN � I � ' - _ © � v 1 ,� DATE SITE DATA 7_07AL. ACREAGE 1000-f16-OE-1 ,5f O sq,{i l r' �, E 58�; _ —�"` 2J '�l0 , 1000-1(6'-06--&2.` 14,746 s .if. TOTAL. ACREAGE 65,25P q.ff. P(1�LCIIVG BZIC WATE TH ,( �� l t "oI ' v R) cv'X- AREA rAREA OF D1STL.IRSANC'Ef 24,000 sr1.f9. i' �tP i 1 N CD — l�yCU4 co A^l , _ ai 2�aAFR De fNA`a 1L7 � V 'HOUSE' 0" LP ROOF AREA: '!��,2:.5 - � = 67b USE- (4) 84 x ' deep = 6`55 cu.1I. 711 / � i I f2? 6'0 x 5' deep = 223 .1t. ' ' "ter *�mz USE 4" P9F' " TOTA..- - 898 cu.ft. �� li r II►I � S SE_ PIP FTY 1 I IaAm I/ cu 1 DRIVEWAY � I 1I TC @E,� 1 ARI:., * C i4 3F. I)GOR AREA °' ►I / '� ►spa f 1 PUBLCIWAKTH. 300.8 4�u.f#. cW; ISE � � 1, r' � �-,. dee' = 337.92 + °� ii R) BItER' x t'u.i.. Q , . 1 AREA 2 TURN AR EJN!I A NID, P 4 7�' tr^ 15• ,750 s II. x - �fN ,2� 8r 4r_deep 7 u.fl .9._. USE A� x dee IU 3370 2 I 4 ft l �r AREA .; DRIVEWAY E .� _ � PR / 4ft0 ' I / � � USECif 8"kx 4P deep =- 337.Cr `fPF FROM TRENCH 4' fEDip LANG I / 24. C� J idi'�E�.jN,>�".F,." ,`^'�r�i _' �{�'c ••w, -X17 4 �? = STO 4' deep " deet, �1 � G ! DP ''EL 8. MApt\ v TEST HOLE DATA 1 ' _ 140 -i / AG Zs 1 g BY McDONALD GEOSCIENCE __a / ` © l� 6 `11/13 �(,v —WE `7,61©L 2nd � -I1 �0, °opsc)t_ t T MAPS �`1 EL. 6.5' UER 1 ' �• DECK*8'2 I kq ic 1 DARK BROWN LOAM OL 7 00 BROWN CLAYEY SAND SC 3. tv) P0 CERA �AR ( _ Io PALE BROWN FINE SAND SP ,08 to q \ F EL. 1.4' 5.1' DaL A� �•+ � / '� L�" ATE QEDAIq 0 '0�'Sf Wq► ` ! n - sT 4N \ � AK Tp N wq\ �2 `l Sj WATER IN PALE BROWN FINE SAND SP sy 'DWq E H�+o►s 3 kft, w \ '�q4AR S ` ` ` ^do �/� ` � e OA, 01W Q 01P F� 2Dr3ENrgt o'Ay�'FRMr `� .......... `� �c�rq� �, INC. � fq / 1 Lp Ca r � --_..,�. _ Q1_ yE ,I � l TREE GO - GerATI \N1, OLgA,OWq Eg+ \ 48.9 £ Nc r aftR$ANCf STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CONTROL �L�A'G 9r�� Dp f FLOOD ZONE FROMFLOOD iivSUR ANLL RATE E MA r FROM STORMWATER MANAGMENT CON7120L � Dlk U MAP NUMBER 36103C0501H SEPTEMBER 25, 2009 PLAN BY SPH F/SCHErn, PE. To �0i 40e Cs�eB'4?pr Ir)I ELE1iAT10 P. OX 616 �W J NS REFERENCED TO N.A.V.D. 1988 SOUTHOLD, NY. 11971 ) 631—765-2954 nE uNf /I OW ANY ALTERATION OR ADDIlTON TO THIS SURVEY /S A V10LAT70N WRCO CERTIFIED TO: OF SEC77ON 7209OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. ,�+� ' 'S' TODD FREED EXCEPT AS PER SECTION 7209—SUBDIVISION 2. ALL CER77RCAT70NS EDITH WEBSTER FREED HEREON ARE VALID FOR THIS MAP AND COPIES THEREOF ONLY IF jC'' SAND MAP OR COPIES SEAR THE 1lWI°RESSED SEAL OF 7NE SURV€YOR �`4.�" �46 �rFAN Hr�y wq ADVOCATES ABSTRACT INC ,, ADA2455—S WHOSE SIGMA TUBE APPEARS HEREON. �R STEWART TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY l am familiar with the STANDARDS FOR APPROVAL AND CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSURFACE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS FOR SINGLE FAMIL Y RESIDENCES and will abide by the conditions set forth therein and on the �OF NEkV permit to construct. The location of wells and cesspools shown hereon are from field observations and or from data obtained from others. d Y.S LIS NO. 49618 R , P.C. TOTAL AREA-$5,258 80. FT TO TIE LINE x (631) 765-1797 SOP 1`498 Acres ■ =MONUMENT 12 STREET sOUN , 1v Y. 11971 ��2--,240 0 Southold Town Board of Trustees neopost— Town Fall Annex, 54375 Route 25 02/20:2014 PGBox 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 7;7:- i c- , a , 04 • I I A ❑ INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS 0S -E�t*OTNABLE C ❑ ATTEMPTEDNOT KNOWN ❑ OTHER ❑ NO SUCH NUMBER/STREET DELIVERABLE FORWARD A ADDRESSED t _ cc J Z,,-,iso V0. o vi c, - . -p M arc er 5+r� "• a S , /GSD a - � -'i i 'It, 'I �� i,i,��i��l!!!�lfl�ll�f;�l+►I�.�It,+ll'!'! . . , 0 Cantrell, Elizabeth From: Silleck, Mary Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 2:46 PM To: Verity, Mike; Cantrell, Elizabeth Cc: Duffy, Bill Subject: Zarko Attachments: Zarko.pdf Mike and Liz, Bill asked me to forward this letter to you that our office received on May 4th Thanks Mary 1 May 4, 2016 Mr. William Duffy RECEIVED Town Attorney MAY 0 4 Town of Southold Zd16 54375 Main Rd TOWN P.O. Box 1179 A7TORNEY'S OFFICE Southold, NY 11971 Sir, It has come to my attention in a discussion at the Building Department that a fact once known in all of the Departments may have been lost in the transition of power between the former Town Attorney to you. The subject I am concerned about revolves around a parcel of land in the hamlet of Cutchogue formerly known as 1000-116-06-12, now in the eyes of some subdivided into two parcels 1000- 116-06-12.1 and 1000-116-06-12.2 There is a question of ownership of the second identified parcel of land (1000-116-06-12.2)that is currently being contested in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Suffolk in the court of Judge Andrew Tarantino. The case reference is Todd Freed and Edith Webster Freed v Barbara Best and Zarko Svatovic and is currently still active. The homeowners in the adjacent neighborhood have deeded beach rights. Mr. Freed has already been fined for activities on the parcel and for removal of healthy landscaping. He additionally ravaged the rest of that parcel removing beautiful trees and under plantings that had existed on that property for many years. The fact that litigation existed was discussed with the then new Assistant Town Attorney,the Chief of Police,the Building Department,the Planning Department, and the Trustees. We personally affirmed in each of these departments the fact that litigation was ongoing and that permits that infringed or impacted that parcel should be questioned and referred to your office and that any police officer deployed to the site would be aware of the litigation. In no way have we challenged Mr. Freeds use of the parcel he is building on nor have we taken any action to interfere with that work. However, anything impacting the Right of Way(ROW) is of paramount interest to my fellow deeded rights owners in my neighborhood. Recently, the building department informed us the site 12.1 and 12.2 in their eyes and with direction from your office was to be treated as one parcel, even though the plans for construction submitted indicate and reflect 2 parcels. Until recently everything done at the site has complied with the boundaries as if the property was 2 contiguous lots and no infringements were made. About two weeks ago, without permission, heavy equipment and land fill was put on'the ROW in direct contradiction to previously issued requirements by the court. We were heard by Judge Tarantino and he concurred with our complaint and Mr. Freed was required to remove the land fill and replace the construction barrier to its original position. Again, it is not our intent or interest to hamper Mr. Freeds progress completing his construction. Our interests lie specifically in the 2 rod wide right of way in each of our deeds. We have engaged legal counsel of an attorney to represent our interests so if you require factual details on the case you can contact Mr. David Fallon, 53 Main St#1, Sayville, NY 11782, and telephone number (631) 567-0340 We would hope that you would reaffirm our interests in the town departments that issue permits or have jurisdiction over plantings, removals, or construction. We are especially worried about in the row or the wetlands area which will effect access to our deeded beach. Attached is a photo of that point of access taken on April 30, 2016. Thank you for your attention to this matter, if you have any questions please contact our attorney. The Deeded Residents p s t l } t t ma c f�� *.� � a' r5 ..✓a W-- 47, VIA .� nb ,y ` ♦ 'a 1 ��€ � P° yr a �p,� z ��' {�,.<3 r t s�' { t ij tkaG y��_� '� < r{{ �� 1 � � � t y* {,¢�a^` F�,i n,a -�. a � 5"; J��y v} 7� � r• ��'' i �� a s ;g`�a' 't• P��, �z .-gyp a$ s• t '�s�t - '";: 40, .yt J rs �i.•f,-1�fc� T :-'d„� •�x t p -e .c'w' *=asi t' Z •r£ p,T+ 't4L� � 1�� r� .�� r.. -f4 . f.�,,j- � � ° ��,. s � fi� � ��'i •�'y � �'� r� _:+s �+ 'jai. �;!' l�� 't. �p ` ��pif�I ,�•� a. � �, t i, �.�;�'�� w�`�.�fir� i� ,��'v � � t� � .sx � 1 $T�X 3t� II l° /�t'bt. "` ,a. '�►�� r yy�J'G'M �!'`!9{ ti '.�a � ��. t ' a.' J `rX� 4'�gva*�.r ! r, 'J� � ;{' �1 '►�;'r J, N4 •�� } tJ� �1 � 1-"T„, (W! yy� y� � �'�� r � hil �i,�j,5t f n.,��,, p. t •p � �t C ):� � !h• '��M C /,f✓,_ .Y � h' p q t � Y/.y�� .�a � ♦ ave _a �.. �.; f i t tl 430 �iexr t t d' t a' mf f � Wye ";Y. 1 �`\n I •£ �d Nj } �' ««fir f;. s.�e^'—y"�" � � �.. �" t •��. � w as : WATA SDI �s'+Y r �•v. k • �� "�� 4 � �J, '$ � 1 �``"�.. { is � ��r„ T� E �" Y 9!` .. � r,..,.�V � l,a ";`\'� 'tl� � [ 9rq, � yr aid, `Lt��. f`� tl� q„a;5 � `•,3. ... e F"� �k�Af_ � f'ti�v �A�}�t^� FA t � .� 4�"'k �@ #�• R. � �.. .� �� " f may+ Y� k � � ka �"�+ ;h.'• � �y}}�q '�.lt 'SdT" d .4k• fit`R � _ i� � d'�#,.. ; ,� 'P. A h{4 r -KA—INrei fr; q < '_ \�R�M .`i4 Cantrell, Elizabeth From: Zarko Svatovic <svatovic@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 11:52 AM Subject: URGENT- Fraud in the Town of Southold! Attachments: Illegal Permit.doc Please read attached letter. i April 21,2016 To: Town Board&Building Department Town of Southold Town Hall Southold,NY 11971 and Suffolk County District Attorney's Office Government Corruption NY State Attorney General's Office Government Corruption RE: Demand for immediate rescinding of the illegally issued building permit and forcing compliance The town issued an illegal building permit#39201,based on a fraudulent survey,in violation of its procedures,to a person who does not own the property. ' The property referred to is Right of Way(ROW)located between 12400 and 12600 New Suffolk Avenue, Cutchogue,New York. The town code demands that any permit issued in violation should be immediately rescinded by any inspector that becomes aware of the violation. At the town hearing in 2014,town attorney Martin Finnegan gave false assurances that the permit does not allow building of any kind on the ROW property to the owners of the adjacent to the ROW lot,that in spite, of the fact that the permit was issued based on the fraudulent survey that annexed the ROW property. The unethical and deceitful position taken by the town attorney is not only a disreputable but the attorney's act involves the town of Southold in the fraud.It is a-crime to produce documents that illegally deprive people of their property rights. Since'I informed the town in advance about ongoing corruption and this fraud and in view of the direct involvement of the town attorney in the fraud the town is knowingly, willingly and continuously participating in this fraud even though the town was put on advanced notice. I have commenced a lawsuit against the town of Southold in the Supreme Court of Suffolk County alleging town corruption and fraud.The case is now in front of the Appellate Division of the State of New York, Second Department. The justice will be served and all the accountable parties will beheld fully responsible for the incurred damages,further damages due to continuous of this fraud and for possibly criminal wrongdoings. Zarko Svatovic 250 Mercer Street NYC,NY— 10012 - cc. Scott Russell,Town Supervisor Town Board of Appeals Town Attorneys Office and other interested,parties Cantrell, Elizabeth From: Zarko Svatovic <svatovic@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 7:55 AM Subject: Systemic failure of the building permits approval process in the governance of the township of Southold Attachments: ToTownBoard.doc; RescdindBuildinPermit.doc Request to Rescind Permit: Attached link are EXHIBITS To view Ret{ueal to Rescind Permit with exhibits, click on the attached documents. 12kescindPeri-nitFulfDoc.doc 1 October 7, 2014 To: Town Board Town of Southold Town Hall Southold,NY 11971 RE: Systemic failure of the building permits approval process in the governance of the township of Southold This is a request for scheduling of my presentation to the Southold Town Board at the next open public meeting of the board on Nov 5, or at the other earliest convenience. When I first attempted to discuss with the town attorneys office the issues involving illegal permits granted to 12400 New Suffolk Avenue property the office advised me to "get a lawyer" because they do not discuss the issues with laymen. When I brought to the attention of Town Supervisor the issuing of illegal permits granted to 12400 New Suffolk Avenue property and an evident and harmful bias of the town attorney's office towards private interests, he advised me that if I suspect a fraud that I should "get a lawyer" and present my case to District Attorney. When I asked the Building Department to explain documentation regarding the illegal permits granted to the 12400 New Suffolk Avenue property, granted in spite of my earlier written warnings about the allegedly and ongoing fraud involving the property currently under litigation in the Supreme Court,the answer was still the same: "get a lawyer". This consistently offered advice, seemingly an unwritten local procedure,translates into "if you are not prepared to spend $400/per hour on a lawyers you have no rights". Something is very wrong with the apparent assumption that the township governance is immune to consequences of their irresponsible actions that cause economic harm to some constituents in favor of the others. One should not have to go to court to get an honest building permit or to have to bring a lawyer in order to talk to the local government official. This is seriously WRONG. The elected officials are directly responsible for fair and unbiased treatment of their constituents in the activities of the township. The elected officials are responsible not only for their own actions but also for the actions of the arbiters under their supervision, including the town attorney's office. If the entities under town supervision take actions that harm citizens, forcing them to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on legal fees in order to correct incompetent, biased or corrupt decisions of the township - like issuance of an obviously illegal permit which would have not been issued if the responsible parties actually read the documents -the elected officials should be fully liable for the cost of the legal action to correct the error. The elected officials of this county are directly responsible for the sound management of this township, law and order and for upholding the values of this democratic society. The community as a whole depends on it for survival. Please find attached: Request to revoke Permit#39201, issued regarding the property at 12400 New Suffolk Avenue, Cutchogue,NY - 11935 My previous correspondence with the board on the issue. Thank you for your cooperation, Zarko Svatovic 250 Mercer Street NYC,NY— 10012 svatovic@hotmail.com 646-232-6663 cc. Town Supervisor Board Members Town Assessors Building Department Town Attorneys Office October 7, 2014 To: Building Department Town of Southold Town Hall Southold,NY 11971 RE: Request to Revoke Permit#39201 which was issued related to property at 12400 New Suffolk Avenue, Cutchogue,NY - 11935 The issuing of the Permit#39201 signifies a systemic failure of the Southold Township building permit approvals process. On September 26, 2014, according to the Freedom of Information Act, I requested to review information based on which the Permit#39201 was granted by the Southold Building Department. The following are the reasons why the permit should be immediately revoked. 1) Permit#39201 was issued to non-existent property. See Exhibit A. Sufficient reason by itself to revoke Permit#39201. 2) The submitted survey does not match the description of the property in the deeds the Permit#39201 rests on. See Exhibit A Sufficient reason by itself to revoke Permit#39201. 3) The required subservient permits needed for the Building Permit were not based on the same survey and the same property description the Permit#39201 was granted on. A number of significantly different surveys with inconsistent ever- changing property descriptions were used to obtain the various required permits (such as Health Department permit). Technically, those surveys were referring to different properties. Some surveys are showing two lots instead of one and some are referring to Tax Map descriptions that are illegitimate or do not exist any more. The permit also conflicts the applicant's sworn affidavit based on which the Permit#39201 was issued. There is no consistency whatsoever in this mess. Sufficient reason by itself to revoke Permit#39201. 4) The Spano Abstract title search unequivocally certifies that applicant does not own the property for which the Building Permit#39201 was issued. No other title searches exist to conflict Spano Abstract findings. In fact the applicant own title searches, not offered into evidence, confirm Spano Abstract title search finding. See Exhibit B. Sufficient reason by itself to revoke Permit#39201. 5) Permit#39201 is referring to the same address but not to the same property for which a Building Department permit was issued in 1985. There is no reason or logical explanation why the same property, which had been 115' x 300' in size, or about 1 Acre, suddenly, in 2013, expands markedly in size to 145'-x 449', 50% bigger in fact, than the same property in 1985. Also,there is no plausible explanation to justify 2013 sudden disappearance of the adjacent 100 year old Right of Way property which through the history of 100 years was never part of the 12400 New Suffolk Avenue property. See Exhibits D & E - Russell Case's, last occupant of the property, relevant deeds indicating the size of the property and 1985 building. Sufficient reason by itself to revoke Permit#39201. 6) The supporting documentation in the Building Department files is incomplete, self contradicting but sufficient enough to warrant an immediate revoking of the issued Permit#39201: a) The Lot for which permit was requested does not match the Lot for which the permit was granted. Building permit was requested for the Lot referred to, by Tax Map No. 1000-116-6, Lot 12.3 (no info in the files) but the Building permit was issued to the lot referred to, by Tax Map No. 1000-116-6, Lot 12.1, (no such lot exists) Lot 12.1 according to the sworn affidavit and the survey based on which the Permit#39201 is issued is not a lot at all; 12.1 is only tax designation. See Exhibit C. Sufficient reason by itself to revoke Permit#39201. Note:Building permits are issued for the entire property or the lots, not for Tax Map designations which are used only as mere descriptions of the properties. Tax Map designation is just an incidental tool to help describe the property for collection of taxes and nothing else. b) The survey based on which Permit#39201 was granted in fact doesn't support existence of any plausible or feasible property, as that survey is defined. The deeds the survey rests on do not support existence of the property for which the Permit#39201 was granted. See Exhibit A, Page 5 Sufficient reason by itself to revoke Permit#39201. There is only one lot associated with 12400 New Suffolk Avenue property according to the permit, the Building department statement, Tax Maps. before year.2013 and since September 2014 according to the attached applicant's sworn affidavit (after applicants' change of mind on the split). See Exhibit F -Applicant's sworn affidavit For more than 50 years since the subdivisions of the Wickham Case Estate Lot 12.0, before it disappeared,was shown to be 115' x 330' in size,that according to all the publicly available documents. .The final survey claims that the lot for which Permit'939201 was granted is 149' x 449' in size. The lot is described by two Tax Map designations 12.1 + 12.2 which are according to applicant's sworn affidavit not lots or • r' parcels and in fact do not exist any more because they were replaced by something designated as lot 12.3; there is no documentation on file. Lot 12.3 used in the request for the Building permit. c) Permit#39201 approves building on the ROW property,which is not and was never part of the 12400 New Suffolk Avenue property. The ROW property on the building plans corresponds to 2013 Tax M'ap 1000- 116-6-12.2 designation, which apparently doesn't exist any more. See Exhibit G - Approved Building on the ROW property. Sufficient reason by itself to revoke Permit#39201. d) Permit#39201 was issued based on false assertions in the applicant's sworn affidavit. That which is stated in the affidavit is in conflict with almost all the other evidence. The use of the sworn affidavit was evidently suggested and approved by the Southold Township Attorneys Office in order to counter the disagreeable evidence opposing the issuing of this bogus building permit. The applicant's sworn affidavit constitutes a clear deception. See Exhibit F - The sworn affidavit. Sufficient reason by itself to revoke Permit#39201. e) The supporting documentation and the approval process employed in the issuing of the Permit#39201 were below any rationally acceptable standard. The supporting documentation and granting of Permit#39201 represent an across the board systemic failure of the process. This failure cannot be explained by the incompetence of the individuals involved in the issuing of the permit. The failure suggests a planned and deliberate attempt to derail the permit issuing process for an economic gain of certain individuals"at the expense of the community. Sufficient reason by itself to revoke Permit#39201. In conclusion: The Permit 439201 was issued in violation of town procedures. The granted permit almost entirely rests on the false sworn affidavit of the applicant and an implied promise of the town Attorneys Office that it will not challenge the outrageous circumstance of the issuance of this permit. The applicant's attorney letter surprisingly conflicts the sworn affidavit of the applicant it tries to promote. See Exhibit H - Letter of the applicant's attorney to the Building,Department supposedly copying the town attorneys to give it weight. The Southold township departments are apparently using the township attorney's office advice as an excuse for violating their procedure. It should be noted however that each department and the individuals involved in the process are responsible for their actions independently and responsible for getting a proper legal advice notwithstanding the fact that, in my experience, the failure of the permit issuing system can be to a great extent attributed to the negative role, arguably even subverting role, the attorney's office plays in the governing of this township. The issuing of Permit#39201 strongly suggests an outside undue influence on the decision process in the Building Department as well as undue influence on the other Southold township local government departments. The influence peddling or possibly an outright corruption is also evident in the actions of the Tax Map Division of the Suffolk County, which seems to consistently support illicit activities in favor of private interests. The Building Department as well as the Southold Town Attorneys office were informed about the alleged attempt to defraud 22 Cutchogue citizens of their property rights, the case now under litigation in the Supreme Court. The issuance of the Permit#39201 to "the property under litigation" therefore can be interpreted as a biased, informed and deliberate effort in support of the alleged attempt to defraud. The excuse used by the Trustees Department and the Southold Township Attorney's office for refusing to take a requested action against the previously issued, obviously illegal permits to the same property, was that "the property is under litigation". The granted work permits relied on the same Quit Claim deed which, it was agreed on, can not be used as a proof of ownership. The fact that "the property is under litigation" however didn't matter when the same applicant requested another illegal permit for the same fictional property. The issued permit still depends on the same Quit Claim deed, as agreed previously,that it is not acceptable as a proof of ownership. Furthermore, the town Attorneys office is evidently giving a legal advice to a private citizen, at taxpayer expense, on how to subvert the town's procedures. See Exhibit H. The issuing of this outrageous Permit#39201 is an insult to al the law-abiding, tax-paying citizens of Southold township who must abide by the rules of the real building application process. Zarko Svatovic 250 Mercer Street NYC,NY— 10012 cc. Town Attorneys Office Southold Town Board jt Trina Waldron 300 Short Road PO Box 786 Cutchogue,NY 11935 July 30, 2014 Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold Town Hall Annex 54375 Route 25 --- -- ,f PO Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 RE: TODD FREED EDITH WEBSTER-FREED JUL 3 0 2014 12400 NEW SUFFOLK AVENUE, CUTCHOGUE SCTM 116-6-12 �autholo Town r TrUstees Dear Mssrs. Bredemeyer,Domino,King and Sanders: I am writing you this letter because several past submissions by the above parties and/or their attorneys to the Town of Southold have apparently contained misleading or erroneous information. Although the Suffolk County Tax Map designates two parcels owned by the Freeds,I believe this map is in error. The 117 foot parcel designated by the SCTM as .l does indeed belong to the Freeds. The 33 foot parcel to the East designated as .2 apparently has never,been owned either by the Freeds nor the previous owner of the Freed property. Attached is a certification by Spano Abstract Service Corp. which clearly states"no title vested in Todd E. Freed and/or Edith Webster Freed" on page 2. The Freeds apparently have asserted ownership of the SCTM .2 parcel to the East based on a quit claim deed that they executed,I believe,with the previous owner of the Freed property who had no apparent fee interest, either. The quit claim deed itself appears to describe land 33 feet to the WEST of the Freed property which is currently owned by the Plimpton,not the parcel to the EAST of the property. Third, and most important,I believe the Town of Southold has jurisdiction over subdivisions, and I am not aware of any approvals issued by the Town nor,indeed, any submission by the Freeds of a proposed subdivision. I am therefore requesting that any pending or future submission by the Freeds be denied until such time as the ownership and tax map designation be resolved,not only because apparently they do not own the 33 foot parcel to the East but also because only the Town of Southold can make a subdivision determination. Further,I am asking you to review the Freeds' subnmission to the Health Department which contains a survey and is stamped,"received"by the Board of Trustees on February 18,2014, showing a survey with ownership of both parcels(copy attached). I am also requesting that action be taken to notify the County that the tax map is apparently in error and that the ownership issue is currently in litigation in the Suffolk County Supreme Court. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Yzfy"y � n Trina Waldron attachments: Spano Abstract Service Corp. certification; stamped survey copy submitted by Freeds SPANO ABSTRACTSERVICE CORP. WWWSPANOABSTRACT.COM 370 Old Country Road,Suite 100,Garden City,NY 11530 (516)294-7037 / Fax(516) 742-9375 SPANO ABSTRACT SERVICE CORP D E CQ 11 E HEREBY CERTIFIES TO THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, JUL 3 0 2014 SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK Southold Tow,il THAT it has caused a chain of title search to be made in the Office of the Clerk of the County. of Suffolk, State of New York, from February 10, 1869 through the date of this Certificate, against the Premises being a parcel of land 33 feet(2 rods)wide,extending from the southerly side of New Suffolk Avenue to the shoreline of Peconic Bay, presently shown on the Suffolk County Land and Tax Map as Parcel Number District 1000 Section 116.00 Block 06.00 Lot 012.002. Said search has been conducted for the purpose of determination of the identity of any parry or parties which may have a fee interest or easement interest in the premises searched. The Premises under examination was part of a parcel of 150 acres, more or less, conveyed by Elijah Landon to Nancy F.Case by deed dated February 10, 1869 and recorded May 11, 1869 in Liber 159 Page 193. In her Last Will and Testament,Nancy F. Case devised"...unto my sons George H. Case and Wickham Case all my Real Estate to be divided equally between them." George H. Case and Wickham Case were appointed as Co-Executors of the Last Will and Testament of Nancy F. Case. On January 2, 1897 George H. Case and Wickham Case exchanged quitclaim deeds whereby portions of the Real Property devised to them by Nancy H. Case was divided between them. Pursuant to said deeds,each recorded March 20, 1897 in Liber 455 Pages 153 and 154,respectively, Wickham Case acquired sole fee title to the Premises under examination'(Lot 012.002), while George H. Case acquired title to the premises immediately adjacent to the Premises under examination(Lot-012.001). In his Last Will and Testament, Wickham Case devised all of his property,both real and personal,to his three children Oliver W. Case, Clifford T. Case and Ruth B. Case. Said devise vested fee interest in the Premises under examination, and fee title to all of the lands presently bounded by New Suffolk Avenue on the South; Linden Avenue on the West;North Fork Country Club on the North; West Creek on the East. Through a series of three deeds,each dated June 5, 1952,between and among Clifford T. Case and Marion Case, his wife; Corrine B. Case(widow of Oliver W. Case); and Ruth B. Case,all of the various properties which lie north of New Suffolk Avenue were divided among the three parties. Each of the three deeds granted an SPANO ABSTRACTSERVICE CORP. WWW.SPANOASSTRACT.COM 370 Old Country Road,Suite 100,Garden City,NY 11530 (516) 294-7037 / Fax(516) 742-9375 easement over the Premises under examination for passage on foot from New Suffolk Avenue to Peconic Bay. There are no subsequent deeds terminating any easement rights or conveying any fee interest other than the deeds in Liber 12718 Pages 263,264, 265 and 267,discussed hereinbelow. As of the date of this Certificate,fee title to the Premises under examination(Lot 012.002)is vested in the heirs,devisees, successors and/or assigns of Clifford T.Case, Oliver W. Case and Ruth B. Case, subject to the easement rights appurtenant to the various premises presently known as Lots 003.000 through 009.000, 011.001, 012.000, 013.000,014.000, 016.001 through 021.00,022.001, 022.002,021.003,025:001, 026.000 and 028.001 in District 1000 Section 116.00 Block 02.00 on the current Suffolk County Land and Tax Map. A series of deeds describing the Premises under examination,all having been recorded on January 22, 2013 in Liber 12718 Page 263, 264, 265 and 266 were each delivered by Grantors with no apparent fee interest in the Premises under examination. None of the aforementioned deeds contains any recital regarding the Grantors' source of title for the Premises under examination.This company finds no title vested in Todd E. Freed and/or Edith Webster Freed by virtue of the aforementioned,or by virtue of any other instrument in the public record. Copies of all documents referred to herein are attached hereto. THIS company's liability is limited to One Thousand ($1,000.00)Dollars for any reason whatsoever. No policy of insurance is to be issued hereunder. p E �. E � V , SP O AB C SERVICE CORP. JUL 3 0 2014 ' OMAS E. GAFFNEY S6uthoid T&ln Assistant Counsel B Tru`'ees Dated: May 21,2014 Title No. SS9848 6.5A(c) 28 ' CZ) eua - 1.0A l o too ' � Q • 11.1 D tao 19 s' . , 25.1 •� 9 -C 17 21 g 1.3A(c) o` aq• \ kip tab tag j iw CASE RD. (49.9) ), Me O 28.1 \; 12-fl . 18.1 g 22.3 3.2A(c)� C9.2 -.\ g O \ d `�•-5.2A c go dao tw 100 co 113 U3 ua ns W C TOWN O5k`SQUTHOLD J _.� p `-✓ 4 a 5 S g 8 13 14 822.1 822.2 S M \�. aZr 100 1 113 \ AVE. 150 111 110 Ile 33 Ir3 3m • 8 9 10.1 810.2 11 12.1 N 13 ,4 4' 3.8A(c) •• ' 1,1A(c) UA(c) 1.2A(c) 1.2A ,- 1.4A(c) 2.9A(c) 0 7 .�— m 15 18 17.1 0 I 5.7A(c) '- __-- ...�-- �'� 1.1A(c 1.7A(c) = r' ••�, S 19.2 • J 1 w 1.8A I50 0 -�• a: tog 02cn LL rrs 0 PECONIC \......... -- - o Mao HO.in RN. U/li� S/"'•�' ,. \\ /J FGR PCZ NO � F 0.pLl HD. � SEE RO■G No me ND. lalao/3 1 Rrlmo7 - •� 3+ b CV � m ae.7Kd as 2U&I $ �� O Fo ,� IOWHOFSOUr11OLD a4 61AA 13 ,.{--. 1T rd�ll.trar •i9 rDMCFSWHOLD �) w r_�•^ FecG111elu,Grnllsr � 4■"04 JOdG4YYYY1wbN11YiMIJ y i 84 36yY1 7 � Toww"+O ■s _ _ ` �: 1 f . . r Y 'He 1 ilwd • 4 iTN4 7 J _ 7 ti 31 29 ., uu w11ruNOla PSCONct*MI11M - /• IulY1FMlIU7N/tJ Leowtllna+rr+W[+`o111 0 ` �'•J u 111 r I 30mco �''•f , ' 2 aAkZ60M incl 2Wk1 L` 33 y ,L1 � 17 1 I twuawl.Nwlw 'y ` L-- GSE HD. 14"1 •y. ��+ ` l 1:61 ( 727 a2yy : \ 92 teJAR4 j l `], Tc"b0160t171101D i 3 :1'' ;. U, a a ■ U 7 N out 3" '•:+L. f C AYE. 77•`', 13 �. 1pMg1 •• N ilw4cl 11 a 111.1 IE7 11 13.2 +■ U i. ____ ` 1.uw J :■ � ,�• at■A�d,� I.,HtI 1 vye f 1Atq +2M� 1•Gby 73.W fe sof 1 T K tJNd f1 E7.Lwlot t4 3 aw 21. ' w �- -...RLC'-.r•�� ^� :_lilLM"'ti. L • , ° 13 1 MEOifHOLD 'r01~+ f17 PEcol1�/c --- �1. ^��\� _l `=`,.U*m A�(h �s N /! �� 193 -y�•e�• � �Qcn�-w.�.c.� c�.u.c., n4r�.u.�.>;,�p.�. r�C..c,c�i o�Ge.�..��rvui- /'Gw,nn�,�.rG; t..�, �.{,.,x o�,n,w I d.JC.,v„�,�3-r•.� ti..: cc,t� unse�cwrol-cc) 1 JUL 3 0 2014 Liber 159 Page 193 soufhaa TO'hil 1' Q � B (Tose ;. �ii,�y �(./`�,�t.a�J,t�..�itJl/l.t�, L.'�.r.s.�l o•c •1 I' r CYVI Ll C4-1- CZI.E CA." C� V�/V�� AAII CAI/AA, ov'r � U w .1;. /Y di/LGc/y CW/L.L -0 CM.cI..i►wu�.� U <a ...�..,n I� � YrA�tJl/ �+tiv Gt.ttif/�• �tn� I 1 �""_"'• C,t�,ti/i,Ltti L�c�.dcvtti a..r( C.rw.+- Q.t.,M� WQ •�-�-t.i � O�.�nxu. -G; '(naltin.ti ti.trt �n w'��Ol �r Gt_Yeti. � c.�.: �G�.�C.L �•ti(it�l.�; ccs .c,(,�i, o.�[iCM�GL �'Gt/l.b �h vY tJ.�,�,a•vv C.�c�' Citi' �jF• a.c.o�ti9 ��U o,� c.G�a.:e. h �1•c�.�.�,U cis. .c,.��ea�.��Ar ":' - ..` ��,•�,..t.d.. a.v-C.�t.' u.2,c.�.�.c'8' 0 �.cc-�o�.�.�e,d�7 evw"•e.�,�c.?� �.�.�.c� • o„�t d A( c•%A.a-�. — CkA ata ®r�,.•!.�-e,ti� ,,..c..t•�,„tal- .•Q-+t.�`M�, - �� o%.AA- cti,Q,a tq �Jt.l AJ ch-Xe c wC�,�.,� f c,, R-Ct t t.d— &.cXZ,-&-AZ ,�.,,• c C„�, �J.,,,,,n„ (,�,� �,;,,L,c ,;,t c,� i .eat,t,A a t l JeA-v^Aw YA�,,�,�,.�, t,(ti.e,tt.c.�, '�i-rn.t,�nu.ta{ .1,1 C,G«; f7'�m� c0.l.t•a ct..l:�'Jl. � -�,••:, d_,.t.., vw C.GAL.i F 0,.1* CAAZvv,a4-,L h ryc - C,_� a.4Z� VW '(Al a QuA.&eA- C,vw,re,�.f.�.� -eAl G..5' a OA tZ AkAA� cL.vt.., rl.Z J.e.t t,� ovt,t.� -Z 4A.a.+t a.c ca IvwH- VZAI Aa A—OU� c5(f [ LL.Zzt 0.1 C,",t. vu CLu. 1 ,v� "1 cz.,,;a ou,d, 7 6 a-7&R,v r"f , a,-La vv. a.,z 9 rk d-,x. kw E& vV, dt-Z �L,cJ• ol_.,rk CtG.r, e.-I C&.Z 7�t ric,G.;. •G.r cl,�C�,c,,,,.,attG .4 40 fw� OL6-La 'C_trt.w, -e u�C: S'Y .u..�w ti �'3'�t-�.K l�uruw a• C -e-, ,wc_e rA ct.v)-e �r Gt.4v a _ ,1 ,,. d�lR�tal.a.a.) , aA71 I... •rwl.t.� 1,� P.c .cr. No (�ct,y. �G�-l�ll� �•<.a.r{• {� �!/1�.0.�C�.r.r•.- � '��/�,�1/�. �,-y.�f.� o�„ � rt p��y ® � ►= '�-- ��cc.(,a,, c�a�G-m.�,d.�.i.�, . �L�.�.0 •}'Y.t.s_.(�� Q u�. ea,c,- �, y �/ � m px.q.7 C-A . a, v, V•.t.�j•b'yta. GC.�+C.L.O�+a-A�, dA�jµ yv,e.a.,L 00 , CA.A .Ck 0.Ci r..,l.n,, y1r�t,a.F c.f -�cA/.1�t/� .t/�p�,� r�t..�.��c c �1' •G, �� c.eu.0 yv e.,,y Al aCV Al /Lt . t.,C�s .Com,. GCL.CE4-. A, al R�.�- 7--&..4- e-, a,,,Z �Gt,e,�OL Oar . an n.0 wntiA yL.J toMAJ E �1 —C,til.�.n,�`..,..� a..G••r...t.r u1.U. fti�c.L�.,.ac.t.A,dt� &-ft .A,l q-LA- n. ur tIA-a. Cl o-g x .&—.L, 0(9 U%Z-via.oL.aLw-vy ac...-*(- •Y,..:e r,.r t wr . Q MAA 0(.0 -G-e��rrvc q n .,G; W�JL ��. ta�..2.e..�r�{.4.. .`�UI.,L.,LGe.V.,•� 1 el,L.a'�Gt.ey� •- �rivtA,oe...,,. �P• �,�.�.,�..,r. �-1,� esi..fc/.t.�.,Ga3� �..t�e_t:, e.Gu,�eQe.,ry/ C:rn..- ' O-•l.�l;� - G(/lrt a�tJLO�. �c ,L.� �C U..rtJL Gc.V.,.. •to XA� zr L c � �4 ci � m -:,- ^' 0 n'v 0.� v►� til cx- _YV"k cC @.( c�t.�t� &AAA y LA.Q CAA., WY i,�o�.�.c.�.A.�.i ct.�.-roc. •a.�;ra,�,�,�,,C,ec,,.u.�„+e,�r; 441.1 n.l.G�.l C4 MAII cCcti� .uA--(-; &AAA._t o C&AA �a�t�v-�.,c,v OAA C4 u.j_ du..s.a.,c coca: AAA Cum G.. •��,; e, .�-�;t,7 �o �' �' �+•a as j c.U� wtrt OL k ctAAAA LZ4A, O 9 tl I! -�.0-�,�.c LM �Yvt.{[n. ai.1 Gl%�q�q..LAA_ AAA O uL/��C.l o .t,t.Gt.L �t t o .i y c 0 " b c-Gu, a-C ..z,�ct, �t r.� —4-•-c�a u( I •figA� cA,�roc. a O c.P.". O a,.,"L ® A-ftp. 41A, p a«s.t.C, -tnn�11- cox ot-�ti cC YrCkAA.MR,� DtA-_,L GtAA dt. c...0 u Q.eSi ctiA CZAi CA cv q dt.�... Mak ct,(�vw rw�C�ew. l .d�a..o...�� ot.c.�e,,,,,•au,� �(.a.Q., �c.�n,�of-v+..� �� , '; a',c. ,.,� -� �� ¢•.c-n�P�.t- -L�.c,ti-t--ol,wet �. q,�,�t,,,,-, . �:, -►-Yt - . '. :.a.,t.,t,,,: �are..tra..,,,,� � a+..ct�ut,.ti,�G. �.�,a'�p . 7 `�•, �- .. � �..�,,� Q,t,vr•,•,,y , tJ c+�..c.et �, l�.t rr,^'G�.r, c� r�.t.a.A�C.ec,t,,,• u.� • i i LWT Nancy F. Case r g%p (Pit +'f[1 Ft i tog C V E., i i SJ!!T W3>� A2fD �$►� D'. CR$lil. ( a i • JUL 3 0 2014 Z. Iamy !. aMem of Ontahogua. Suffolk Coa:aty, R. Y. ! do mm]m-. publish-and dma]ars this my Inset'Will Mad Testament ' Soufho;d Town i f Tr e • Ma-follawsa • i Iiroti- Y give and begaesth unto My docghter Annie j g. Blabs, all m4 pMraonel property. j 1 i Bounds I gSve.aad denies mato n® so= George R. ones ! i .and Wia]mm Case all jW Reel Satate-to be -divided egsully between tYm m. Thirdt_I give sad begoeath unto my two none George H. Mae and WlWmms due the aim of 0000. in trust to ]meq the mems aMfely -invested and to oollset the Innome thereof and to apply the mane to'the wpost and mainteu me i of ar daughtor Annie W�, ]webs daring bar lifetime; and � after hes dMMth to pry their praportionate sharom of the i priaffi.pal thereat to anoh of her ohlIdaen an ame'thea of i tall age and to- Mpply the iaoome of the balance thereof so the oiport and WAIjeadomft of each of Mid ahi ldren so j ere theta minors d=isg their idnortty: mmd to pay to saehr of tham their proportiowtm share of the'priaaipa3 thereof "I ; they respeatively baeome of age. lied 2 hmreby e>Ureesly ebmaarats•sy persoasl mmtate from the poymsat of-the lagMoy ® and ohasao the payment thereof Won sy Real 8atate devised !a paragrapb seaond'hersof: Iaurths I hereby aoustitats mnd-4ppaint zW some George I. awe Mad Wiaham Ossa, Zzaem►tors of thin mp list i i • V= Mod Temtxmeat hermby renkLmg all other Willa py mn mads. AMY I. amps. 1 ' in WLt. ttberoof stn+ Zones L. sus. Sub. wit to TM. Tama a. Grifftslg, w ` " rI .l�.i�+r.ey+�i`.rfL+r-•.fJA.......:..r:�'.r..•,.�7'{.�...vw+•.:..• a.. ::', .- t •w. .. - t 1�3.w_.r—�.�}µ�, `IM�RRtr1"�;.: 'ry'E- f'.�'cii_'' �s�+3T3:".rv—mta:wi.. ..r yipy/'r•.�M,,�-�.#a�r...t�,.:fr�� .1. _. •.. -_._ �' _ +1NL3i"rau�f``x .;.�Y.��}i�$lil �(f7.'�tiTw3ie'.BW� ['�:��•�^�,y ..k�- �•ch^�- r�r • LWT Wickham Case LAST W= A11D T;0T�L.,..?? . I, i7IC USE of Cutohogue, oT 'the Town of Southold, In the Caunty Of Suffolk and State of New York, being of sound mina and memory, do make, publish and declare this my last Will and Testament, in manner following, that is to say: FIESTs- I direct that all my Just debts and funeral expenses be paid. 31900!M:- I give.ecnd bequeath to my three (g) ch ildre Oliver `. Clifford T. sad Ruth B. all of my property both real and ,personal -in equal parte, tb;:t is to say one third to each. 1ASTLY, I hereby appoint my daughter, R17M B. OASSE sole executrix of this, my last Will and Testament: her revoking all former wills by me made. nq WI'uMS 'krd1 OF, I hav6 hereunto subscribed my name the seventeenth day of January, in the y9ar:One thousand nine hundred and twenty-two. NICEMM CASA, We, Whose names are -hereto subscribed, DO OBRTIPr, that .on the 27th day of Jesuary 1821V Wjokham Cafe of Cutohogue, Suff. Co., N. Y. the testator, subscribed-his name to thin instru- ment in our Presence and in the presence of each of us, and at the same time, in our presence and hearing, declared the. same *to be his last V111 and Testament, and requested us, and eaoh of us, to sign our acmes thereto as witnesses to the execution thereof which we hereby do in the 1wesenos of the testator and of each other on the said date, and write opposite our acmes our respective places Of residence. William A. Fleet, resi"ng at Cutchogue, Buff. Co., N. y. George B. Corey, .resiiuing at Cutchogue, Buff. 'Co. , N. Y. ® E C3 E JUL 3 0 2014 J Southold Town l'.� u L t• " t .k,,r: - Nf.9rh'`�i:l. �'�• z` vt,+.'scim''*a a.r. v�.�1�i _.,. (.1-N-R?r:t JkCL.L��^ r.".."tv.'•tii... >l•- �.W".tir"'i'.r':E'J�14•`,�.f�1�`:t'1�}i.�ti.Sl).Y-4�-iP 7. 3�yr. 7 /••gin /'� SURROOLTI I S COURT - COUNTY OF SOP POLIO. Iu the Matter of the Transfer ; Tax upon the Estate - of - WICE M 'CASE, t+°, deoeased. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JUL 30 2014 STATE OF IZW YORK, Sowhoid Town : ss. : fT COUr1i'Y OF SWOLK. IM ROY S. MMU, being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at Uhttituck, Suffolk County, Now 0 Jr York, and has so resided for over - years; that he has been engaged as a Real Esta a Broker, having a place for the transaotion of business at Mattituok, Suffolk Oounty, New York, and has been so engaged oontinuously for upwards of -years; that during that time he has aoted as a Broker 'in the Bale of real property in and near Cutchogue, .Suft'olk County, New York, and has also aoted as an appraiser thereof. Dep6nent further says that he is well acquaints with the values of real property In and near Cuutohogue, New York, and especially in the neighborhood of property here- inafter mentioned; that deponent is familiar with the-sale of property in the vioinfty of said premises for A period of one year immediately preosdIng the Slat day oY .August, .1931. Deponent further says- that on the day of Ootober, 1931, at the request of Ruth B. Case, the Laecutrix of the past Will and Testament or the above- fir " J •4rn.- ' �: ,ata-:ate ".„•.i'f l,A �raJ f7. . - �s- ;7::'" :' .: t=s•" .1�«,1.:: <•y•��- - •` ... {:ebJ%a� $��'_ `-'.sr,. :k'syzta. .-rrj�.✓;'tti;..G.••. •sti ,-:i;yr:'+t,••:N+.4iY.Ynr�,i..:.. cJll^-'N-r'�, r �: �• ., , .., a.•.tw.:�Yrii�.-zt- 'd3dYi+tiu.s.:trC.e:'t++r=.�.rrt-,•,:::�hr',k-'-t'•, ��`:, - D C .E9 �. JUL 3 0 2014 Southold 76 n 8 a of Tr e named deoedent, he made it personal smamination of the real property of said decadent for the purpose of ascertaining it fair market value on the 31st day of August, 1931, at which time deponent has been informed and believes the said vacrUM USE died .seized of said real, property; that said property as e2mmined by him is briefly described as follows; 'PARCEL-OI�fE. ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon, situate, lying and being on the Northerly side of the plain Road in the Village of Outohogue, Totm of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of.New York, bounded and described as follows: Bounded on the North by land of 'Charles Williamson;; on the East by other land of said Charles Williamson; on the' South by the'Main Road, Sand of Isaac L. Penny and land formerly of Daniel Hebb and on, the West by land of Isaac L. Penny and .laud of John Griffing. Containing about one (1) sore, PARCEL 1:10. A'LL that -traot, pleas or parcel of land, situate, lying and being at or near Outchogue, Town of Southold, . County or Suffolk and State of-How York, bounded and desorib d as follows: BBGINIIJI17G at a point on the easterly' s ide of Mocrelf bane and joining the southriesterly -oorner of land lensed to North Fonct Company by Stuart H. Moore .and running thence the following courses and distances, to Wit; south 1 degree East, 15 feet, South 18 degrees 15 minutes West, 2148 feet to a corner -and other land-or said Wickham Oboe; thence by and along the latter north 88 degrees -40 minutes East, 632.5 feet; thence north 11 degrees, 20 minutes East 97.5 'feet; thence mouth 82 degrees, 20 minutes Bast, 76.5 feet; thence south 11 degrees, 20 minutes West, 85.4 feet; thence north 88 degrees 40 minutes But, 357.3 feet; thence north, 86 degrees 20 minutea Best 365.2 rest; thence again along the lauds or said Wickham Case. north 2 degrees 19 minutes East, 252 feet, north 23 degrees 9 minutes Went -104.2 feet; north 38.degrees 33 minutes West 346.5 feet, north 8 degrees, 28 minutes West, 262.5 Peet, north 0 degrees, 36 mi=tes East, 152.4 feet; north 7 degrees 28 minutes Bast 163.4 rest; nort 43 degrees 13 minutes Bast 82.7 teat; north 10 degrees 49 minutes East 839.6 feet; thence north•20 degrees, 41 minates West 242.4 rest to lands now or late of George Caae; thenoe by Land along said lands .novi or late of George Case north 85 degrees 14 minutes West 216.5 :set to land leased by North fork Company Troia Stuart H. Moore; thence by and along lands last mentioned south 57 degrees 4 minutes West 561.5 feet "r `�:�3-' ..° i . - v. !i•'. ...Y, s {A _cam '!''•i'Il�f�iT..MF.� •�.1�.��1N�^•" '!ry �f"-+ 1 ....r. 'I•t•4j, . . �q:l^- •la.r-i ..tii:.�:R .:R�-•"^f:ZJrj.�i"}.!:r,.' Y.SJC' ."1TT.•j -"...:`lrS�.7.._:':: i.;Set+.liY.r,J.'+s�YtP.-.......t�.....U. j; ® E C EJI , JUL 3 0 2014 Southold Toym B-oard of Trusteu to the place of beginning. Containing 49 3/4 acres and including all rights to said Wickham Case in and to Moore lane adjacent to the-said premises to the center line. PARCFL TBR . ALL that oertain tract, piece or paroel of woodland and meadow, situate, lying and being at or near outahogue, in the Vows of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of NOW York, 'bounded and described as follows-: 'Hounded on the North by Parcel IWO aforesaid and other land of said Wickham Case; on the Fast by.a Creek, sometimes called .Case's Creek; on the South by New Suffolk Avenue and on the Wiest by Moore's Road. Containing about 15 Acres. PARCEL FOUR. ALL that certain piece or .parcel 'of woodland and meadow, situate, lying and being at or-near Cutohogue, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and-State of New York, bounded and described as .follows: Bounded on the North by land belonging to the Estate of Stuart Tbore; on the Rest'by Moore's Road; -on the ,South by meadow land'and on the Mest'by Down's Creek. Con-taining about -ntae acres. 3 PARCEL FM. S ALL that certain -strip, piece or parcel of land, 3 situate, lying and being at or near Cutohogue, in the Tows of Southold, County or Suffolk and State of Now York, bounded and described as follows.- Z$ ollows:J Bounded on the North by Road leading from Mattituck C� to New Suffolk, also known as 'Rett SutColk Avenue; on the Bast by land -now or formerly of Beverly Sing; on the Sout1l by Peconio 'Bag, and on the West by land Of -George H. Case. P2aRCEL BIX. ALL that certain piece or .paroel of Woodland and meadow, situate, lying and being at or near Cutohogue, 'Down of Southold, County of Suffolk and Stete of New York, bounded and described as follows: Bounded on the North by land of George *H. Oass, on the South by Case's Oreek and other land of said Wickham Case; on the West by Parcel No. Two herein and'.the East by said Creek. There is erected upon Parcel one a house oontdin_ ,.,_ r°, _ :iryt�•4x:ti�-..:�t:`�` ,=F - =.e. r� - .. .. si1^'t�•'•ti%aXc.� -' _ -Y4,':�•',�.adt„as' •1f�.!�.T.i�'I[`N•'.1• �\�y�'• "J-•r,•.p� ing eight -rooms and attic, 'barn and sheds. The Parcels 'numbered Two, Three, .pour, Five and Six are vacant and unimproved. :That the .fair market value of aaid premises on the Met day of August, 1831, the•date of•death or said decedent, 'was, In the opinion of deponent as follows-: Paroel Number One, 'O Parcel 'Number. Two, Paroel Number Three Pamoel Number Four $ ,gs dv Parcel Number Five *ya-�!• Paroel Number Sit $ p .Sworn -to before me thisG", day of Ootober, 1831. y Public, 'Suffolk County. C E JUL 3 0 2014 - - d-----seer, nold Town' ard of Trus ee .a w . .. . •f.� .1• ..... . -. i .. f:i fi• n:d' Y• ••.t .• .u4'tn. • t SSS . . , • . ...n {...LY •. . •. 45 � .dc..cl:yC.o�.Cife ..P,a.pi,�,riZ:cy �+: lL�.v' .�.�.c-a .2.0 -•� , /j . l�qr: + ,rn.�. 00�,�,•c,.4.c�:�..�c.�,�y ,•u..�,•.i oc�. .G u..o�c.. ,�n-�;�`Li. • . u.�,�,e� � ,,�,..o.z.�,�. � .max eye, �•�g•�'-•-�-� ,,, j � 7tiw.i»'V � �ttG ili�c,ri•a-r'ry ..c.rt. 6! /✓+'�-� ;, 1 �� 'Y�r� �'c.G��1ii g• .E.�,[�,c.7P^ ,Cikt,' ro �c /�.�' t E 'ir E I J U L 3 0 4 a ✓� r C Southold Tc Boardd ofTrs �• •� —0c Liber liber 455 Page 153 ,.....�. .i P? ,�G�'/.Zcv»'� �a.E.a.G[�, �a� � �• ro.rrlc-►ti-�'G �cJv"� • ✓iUl�-� °�-�(VJ �A-u-t.G� /�ait.�c-�.°' °`.� �C�C'r�r"`'°'''./�o � /� .c.r._s�.�-- • ;• � J�^ lJ�w 10-� u^rty �•Q.o-C.�r,��v _U� .�.�r•r�- �a.4cL �, ��"" � � p� � �� a.u••d. .��- ��-�-�"''`:�dam. ;^• �(�L[G��tGt+G 7w w--y fnnW✓1VLrQ.Cr� lc.�^./c.r�r's. L,.,r�Lvi{• ^�J.q.A.�/�'►K+ �.C.Gii..i ,•a.ic-cst ypc..r,Cy _� ,/(.A�.(i'�a.c.t�ia-�/.. •,b0✓Vt rt.l.•o% 'ltin.c.�rw� �.u.�. u..-u..G.cf�LO .G _ (/ €' �.u; .,�, .- ¢?'�.wr•- cf .. -+tF�� /^.Gc.•pT�i�� .��' �.Or-TEC.- � M'w- J �l`I .•'�'l/V/J Q' ,�Giyu e.• �..�+-....�'�- �C�Gu" c�o-c,,t�',ra.•G�wC.vt.-C.� .�•-�-n=� p-f ��..isG ,.,4./�.eyvt`�.tiv �,.r) faro . ��•��.:.� �C.�cq i�l�c.e�L��+�+` 4 • a' •t, _•�;��.;y;y�.: �'i '^-�� "•? ..�-:• .:� r•.hC.,./roe• :»' •.•.� , � .r. - M OWFn�t2S3 feet; r thence North 13 dogmas, 01 minute, 40 seconds East, a dietsma at 300.0 test to the southerly'line of Case (toad; running thane .{ slang the southerly line or Case Road, South 76 dogroos, §8 siiautos, 20 soaoads Bast, a distance. Or 225.0 rept to the wostorlT lino of mandow Lea•; runtitng than** along the waatorly line of Mosdbw Lane, Death 2.3 de!Po", 01 ImImU, 40 seaondi Went, a distance of 300.0 foot to,the point:or place of begiming. ?OOMM t'with all the right, tXtle•and interest, u any, of the pastier of the first part in and to the highways in trent of and abutting ■Qid pi smiscs to the-respective cantor 11ae• •thersor. Y. PAMEL IYt. —"`A=-tbat•tract or parcel. of land situate, fling and being st Cutohogu•, �in the Toxo of*Southold, County of Suffolk and State of Now Topk, bounded and•doscrlbed as tollowat- SEOnmIG at'a point on tbo *"tar* line or Nowdow Imine (which �a_ `•r point 1s.ilorth'•33 dogracm, 01 minuto, 40 sononds East, a distance of ' 300.0 feet frm►'the Intersection of said easterly ]ice of Meadow Lane with the northiriy lime of New Suffolk Iveaite); running tb*mo North 13 degrees,_Ol atteuts, l;b s•aends East, a distance of 160.2.3 foot; running Tax Lot tbeas• North"89'degrees 0 56 minutes, 40 seconds East, a Ubtanoo of -apprw.:.Umtely'235 rept to thw mclating edge of the woods; continuing •{ 26 tb•m• Iu'th6 'setae dirsation,,North 89 degrees, 56 minutos,,40 sooands East #p,the high water lino of Kest Creek; roaming thence in a southerly dir•siam' along tbe'high water -line of Hest Creek to the ynortherlyy line off laad:oo�pvd or about to be contoyed'to Corinne H.-Case= rununiug thonos•ia•a weat•rly,direptflon,alo4 said landconvoyed or about to be obnvoyed.ta•Corinue'H. Case, Earth 76 degreea,,58 minutos,'20 soeonds Vast/-'to':the sisterly 111no of Meadow Lana at the point or place of f� beL4-- -with all-the•�rigbt; title and- intercat, if any, bf the PH rties of tt}e;firit part':tae-and to•tho highway in front of and abuttinE said pr•ad.sos to the *enter line thereof. • T008'P�i.with trill trio right, title-and interest, if any, of the parties or rho first part' intand to the meadow,•orators, and lemdo eider wdt•r of Went-Crook in tront of and abutting maid promiebs,r to the ' coater 13mo•.theroot* :'. •T•> 'P00BTWR with'a free and mbbstructod iter ia'oc®aou with other Owners of 'ii ii$ht-of-way for pahmago' on Toot over a certain 11rivato Road two (2)"rods•'in-width ru ming'from N aw Suffolk Avenue in a Soutberly direction to_Pboonj Say. 'Said•riglbt-of-Yny being bounded an the North tq-Nox Suffolk Avenue; -an.the•East by land of 8everly Eimgi on:the South by PevcnLo Bay sad on the Wit.by land of the 88tat6.of George-H: class. doo•a6sd•• � i • �r JA. UL 3 0 2014 ' LJ Southold lowil a•• ' - Board of rrustee5 r • U -3. :;-:_ :•,' <iwt:taw.ti �M-+,`flee •tl•_,Y. �Li'•. •t. f.}•rv`' 3'-G STREET ADORERS 124GO NEW SIFFOU(AVENUE N SURVEY OF PROPERTY AT CUTCROGUE TORN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFD�C108MY " *42 m0 saim lt-w }� SFPTE111M A 2012 �s d1Lr z M13 tn"a&am ,► SEPID197R a 2m3(RINGOS) Ar� 9PIDAIR 10.7613(t VL77E7A7M) /'"61•'4 NOVDM 22 267.1(ft 1676 t LOG TIMM G)MORII�i PLAN � ]'761](ECCE OF BEAd 7iA6S) ft,"aucu a faBm aux'ser eA,f .u `� "law rs us r wm�ti PROPOSED SEPTIC sTSTENALTS. PARCEL1 � ,�t FEB 1 8 211{0 S KTP^ 8 iPAR� 1 _� [2)(s)POOL CLUSTERS OF 10'DIAMETER:Y DEEP I LEACHING POOLS [1]2,000 GALLON CYLINDRICAL SEPTIC TANK j- 10' 10'DIAMETER METH A 4'LI11111D DEPTH TD BE BUILT TD SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTNENT OF HEALTH SERNCI~S SPECIRCAuan EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM TD REMOVED IN ACCORDANCE ! WITH SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SPECIFICATIONS. 11 ft:91*0 winWAMU ! f � w � y � f I � b y fn�xa 1 "R� .II8 ' A JUL 3 0 2014 az : �+mb wklo k . r FLOOD ZONE FROM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP MAP NUMBER 361167COSDIH SEPTEMBER 25.2009 Ryt ELEVATIONS REFERENCED TO N.A.V.D.TtUBB �r 11>,ry• CERTIFIED TO. f27TODD FREED ANY N-IFRATNW St FW AMW m 1105 AIRYEY S A HOU761N -'C rr s7ro720%FrhE A¢m roar srAte EDVFI11atr us �Ay tyO/�, 'w,4 EDITH VA]351ER FR® DZUT AS PER MCXYI 72619-MMUSM 2 AIL QRnWAA#lS ' eto, ADVOCATES ABSTRACT INC OADA2 S EN ARE VRA FOR 1169 YAP AIA CO"ES»�oar F SIEWART TITLE INSURANCE Ut IE (�. sAA u ar CWaS NEAR R¢AMif=WAL W IW A6R£IAr 2LN114961fil III,=StbMIW A/7�FAR5 Mown 1FHOLE DATA I am famlkr with the STANDARDS FOR APPROVAL GEDSCIENCEAND CONSMVC71ON OF SUBSURFACE"AGE �M�dX enDISPOSAL SM MS FGR SINGLE FAMILY RES OHMSand WA abide by the cmdlflana set forth fheroln and anMepermit to Construct l OAwrT S fif e I=tk bf wags and cesWools shoav harem are _r DM et sea9 ham Edd abserwilons and w from data obtained from oDRs'S a.%V If PIEWC SUR P.0 PARCEL AREA-SM SQ.FT.70 7E LINE °n w""`�"'a`" s P a Bongo FAx(631)765-1797 PARCEL 2 AREArM0,NB SM FT.70 7E LIE 0-MONUMENT 1240 TRAVELER STREET fr SOUTHOW.N.Y. 11.971 12 240 Cantrell, Elizabeth From: Zarko Svatovic <svatovic@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 2:57 AM To: Lessard, Diane; Hulse, Lori Cc: Cantrell, Elizabeth; Nunemaker,Amanda Subject: RE: Southold Police Incident report (relating to Case#01-13-004747) The Southold Police is refusing to take or investigate any complaints against the Freeds. This is my official report of the incident to the police for my records. In my earlier experience the reports I submitted to the police at the station verbally about the Freeds were not reported or the reports did not state what I reported. This is the only option I have available for the time being to communicate with the police and have a record of what I reported.There is noting more that I need to say. However, if there are any outstanding questions regarding my report I will be very happy to answer. I will be sending copy of my reports to the other branches of government until I am confident that the Southold police is respecting the law and is not biased to private interests. ---------------------------------------------------------------- From: diane.lessard@town.southold.ny.us To: svatovic@hotmail.com: lori.hulse@town.southold.ny.us CC: elizabethc@town.southold.nv.us; Amanda.Nunemaker@town.southold.ny.us Subject: RE: Southold Police Incident report (relating to Case#01-13-004747) Date: Tue, 27 May 201418:39:22 +0000 I would suggest that you call the dispatch number, 631-765-2600, and state that you would like to speak to an officer regarding an incident which occurred on May 26`h or you can come into headquarters and ask to speak to an officer here. I will not be forwarding this email on to anyone. From: Zarko Svatovic [mailto:svatovic@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 11:52 AM To: Lessard, Diane; Hulse, Lori Cc: Cantrell, Elizabeth; Nunemaker, Amanda Subject: Southold Police Incident report(relating to Case# 01-13-004747) Hello Can you please forward this e-mail to the interviewing officer or to the appropriate authorities in order to issue official reports reflecting below described incident. Thank you for your helps Zarko,Svatovic 646-232-6663 5/26/2014 at 10:30 AM The complainant Zarko Svatovic of 12355 New Suffolk Av reports that on 5/26/2014 at 10:30 AM Todd Freed got out of his car and threatened Complainant with unspecified legal action in which Todd will take over not only the Right of Way he is trying to steal but also the complainant's car and his house at 12355 New Suffolk Avenue. Quote Todd to Complainant: "Enjoy your house and your Subaru as long as you can, they will all be mine." 1 .t Todd drove the car over the Right of Way even though Right of Way is limited to foot traffic now for more that 50 years. Complainant was trying to put marker on the edge of the Right of Way. It is difficult to tell where the edge of the Right of way is since the Freeds destroyed the boundary that separated the two properties when they stole the property. * Todd after driving over Right of Way then destroyed two markers Complainant put into the ground. Complainant walked away because Todd was behaving irrationally and there was a danger that Todd might become physically violent and attack Complainant. As complainant was leaving, walking away,Todd was screaming threats after Complainant: Quote Todd to Complainant: "You have no idea what's coming ... "then some threats about Barbara I didn't get clearly but he was referring to his investigation of Barbara Best Tax records and how he will get her too. * NOTE:The ownership of Right of Way is not in dispute. The Title Search of reputable Title Search Agency shows that the Freeds do not own and have no interest whatsoever in the Right of Way. The Freeds themselves never produced any documents whatsoever in support of their ownership of the Right of Way.The Quit Claim Deed filed with the Suffolk County that is trying to deceive by having same dimensions as the Right of way is a forgery without any backing and it doesn't even point to the Right of Way. 2 Cantrell, Elizabeth From: Zarko Svatovic <svatovic@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 11:52 AM To: Lessard, Diane; Hulse, Lori Cc: Cantrell, Elizabeth; Nunemaker,Amanda Subject: Southold Police Incident report (relating to Case#01-13-004747) Hello. Can you please forward this e-mail to the interviewing officer or to the appropriate authorities in order to issue official reports reflecting below described incident. Thank you for your help! Zarko Svatovic 646-232-6663 5/26/2014 at 10:30 AM The complainant Zarko Svatovic of 12355 New Suffolk Av reports that on 5/26/2014 at 10:30 AM Todd Freed got out of his car and threatened Complainant with unspecified legal action in which Todd will take over not only the Right of Way he is trying to steal but also the complainant's car and his house at 12355 New Suffolk Avenue. Quote Todd to Complainant: "Enjoy your house and your Subaru as long as you can, they will all be mine." Todd drove the car over the Right of Way even though Right of Way is limited to foot traffic now for more that 50 years. Complainant was trying to put marker on the edge of the Right of Way. It is difficult to tell where the edge of the Right of way is since the Freeds destroyed the boundary that separated the two properties when they stole the property. * Todd after driving over Right of Way then destroyed two markers Complainant put into the ground. Complainant walked away because Todd was behaving irrationally and there was a danger that Todd might become physically violent and attack Complainant. As complainant was leaving, walking away,Todd was screaming threats after Complainant: Quote Todd to Complainant: "You have no idea what's coming ... " then some threats about Barbara I didn't get clearly but he was referring to his investigation of Barbara Best Tax records and how he will get her too. * NOTE:The ownership of Right of Way is not in dispute.The Title Search of reputable Title Search Agency shows that the Freeds do not own and have no interest whatsoever in the Right of Way.The Freeds themselves never produced any documents whatsoever in support of their ownership of the Right of Way. The Quit Claim Deed filed with the Suffolk County that is trying to deceive by having same dimensions as the Right of way is a forgery without any backing and it doesn't even point to the Right of Way. i Cantrell, Elizabeth From: Zarko Svatovic <svatovic@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday,June 04, 2014 1:26 AM To: Flatley, Martin; Blasko, Regina Cc: Finnegan, Martin; Hulse, Lori; Cantrell, Elizabeth; Nunemaker, Amanda; Russell, Scott; William.Ruland@town.southold.ny.us Subject: Reply to Chief of Police Martin Flatley Dear Sir, I am seriously concerned about our safety. I can no longer trust the Southold police department. In my experience the police department, rather than to protect the community, has used intimidation and threats as a vehicle to advance private interests. This e-mail response is only in my behalf but I believe that you may soon hear from my neighbors as well. The following will elucidate why we, speaking for my family and myself, no longer trust Southold police department. An officer from the Southold police department came on Memorial Day to my house soon after the incident I reported via e-mail to the police.The officer was apparently sent by private citizen Todd Freed evidently to threaten us. If the officer was honest and did his job, as I expected, instead of coming to bully us he would have found out that: 1) 1 was at the scene alone when Todd Freed arrived by car minutes after me to confront me, I assume after seeing me remotely on his security cameras 2)Todd was the one who got out of the car to threaten me. I just left the scene and walked away after he became aggressive. 3) Todd should have called the police if he believed I was doing something wrong and not get out of the car to enforce the law himself while trying to provoke physical confrontation by destroying my personal belongings in front of me 4) 1 managed to avoid physical confrontation only because I swiftly left the scene as Todd was destroying my property, shouting threats and getting violent 5)Todd falsely reported the event to the police with evident intention to entrap or frame me with false accusations which is to the best of my knowledge Federal and State crime 6) My accounts of the incident can be easily confirmed by the Todd's security cameras, which recorded the incident. However, I doubt that Todd would make them available because they are evidence of his lying I didn't see the police report, I just heard about the Freed's accusations from the police officer in my house. I learned from the officer about my supposed attack with a stick on Todd Freed and his 4-year-old child and my shouting of obscenities.There was nobody at the scene other than Todd and me. Who would in the right mind be bringing a child to the scene of an expected confrontation?This man Freed holds nothing sacred, involving even his children in his scams and lies. At the very beginning of this affair in which the Freeds are unlawfully attempting to evict the lawful residents of the land they covet, I have tried first to report in person to the police and afterwards I also reported in 1 writing more than a dozen serious incidents of the Freeds breaking the law including an assault, a personal attack on me on the beach. Not even once have the police department investigated our complaints or done anything other than issuing false or inaccurate police reports. In comparison to that, the one time ever that I am aware of, when the Freeds made a complaint to the police, the police reacted by instant action in the Freeds behalf. The Southold police based on a false accusation responded by intimidation and unlawful threats of arrest against us over a civil matter that the police shouldn't have been even addressing. The policeman that supposedly came to investigate the morning incident held his hand on the gun in my living room ordering me to stay off the Freeds Right of Way, an entirely unlawful demand by the policemen since I have deeded rights to use the Right of Way and the Freeds have no rights to be there whatsoever. The above biased treatment speaks for itself and doesn't need further explanation. The unlawful police action in conjunction with an attempt to frame with a false accusation warrants all the security concerns of the neighborhood. The existing conditions in the neighborhood are unsustainable and a clear violation of the law and order on multitude of levels: 1) I, myself, and few of the 18 owners in common with deeded rights to Right of Way are maintaining Right of Way now for more than, 14 years and other over 50 years. We are the incumbents on the property 2) Maintaining and using the Right of Way all this time gives us rights over this property even without our deeds,the rights based solely on the length of time of residence and usage of the property. 3) We the residents and users of the Right of Way should be protected against the Freeds unlawful land grab, attempts at eviction and attempts of the Freeds to squat on the land 4)The police instead of protecting incumbents is diligently and unlawfully assisting the Freeds while the Freeds are pursuing unlawful land grab using criminal means 5) Southold police are assisting Freeds with unlawful eviction of the neighbors 6) Southold police are blocking any challenge to the Freeds committing crimes 7) The police interference on the Freeds behalf is entirely illegal, creating a reasonable assumption of the Southold police corruption. 8) Nobody is allowed to threaten with harm and forcefully evict from a property without a legal court order, not even police 9) Nobody is allowed to take the law enforcement into their hands to implement his views on the situation as the private citizens Freeds are doing with support of the Southold police. 10)The police should bring charges against the Freeds to the District Attorney for prosecution on multitude of account of breaking the law and criminal activities with goal to steal half a million dollars 11) Other than forged documents, for which the Freeds should be brought to justice, the Freeds produced not a single valid document that would give them any right whatsoever regarding the Right of Way, nor any such documents exist in the public records 12)Title searches of licensed Agencies confirmed without any doubt that the Freeds have no interest whatsoever in the property they are trying to steal with support of evidently corrupted government agencies 2 13) The Freeds are trespassing on daily bases over the Right of Way, obtaining illegal work permits using forged documents, threatening neighbors, confiscating private property and engaging in activities that are clearly criminal in nature 14)The Freeds allegedly corrupted the local government and possibly even the Supreme Court of Suffolk County (to be determined) The police should be reporting the Freeds crimes to the District Attorney's office for investigation instead of facilitating and shielding the Freeds theft of property. This is the second time around that the Freeds are getting away with the crime of false reporting to the police, as the Freeds are protecting their theft of half a million dollars worth of real-estate property. Without having any control over what I am reporting anybody can put words into my mouth and entirely fabricate the situation. I decided that from then on I would stay away from the police station and e-mail my reports to the police in writing only, which I did for dozen or so of incidents, mostly referring to harassments and thefts of my personal belongings by the Freeds.The Freeds stole few of my boats, beach equipment, stalked my house, trespassed and are still trespassing on regular bases around my house at odd hours, day and night. They are engaging in those activities unchallenged by the police for almost a year by now. An hour or so after I reported the May 26 10:30 AM incident to police via e-mail, highly incompetent policemen came to my house to bully me in my own living room. I made a mistake of inviting him into my house. I believed at first that the officer came to honestly investigate what happen that morning. I would have been more than eager to discuss my incident report I already e-mailed to the Southold precinct even though we and few other neighbors who heard about the incident were quite disturbed about the morning event and previous actions or inactions by the police. Policeman did not come to investigate. The policemen knocked on my door, asked me nothing, in fact forbid me to talk about the incident and accused me of attacking Freed and his 4-year-old son with a stick.The policemen then threatened me with an eminent arrest if I don't stay off the Freeds' Right of Way, the accusation of attempted assault against man and his child and the threat of arrest over civil matter regarding the Right of Way having nothing to do with each other. In other words, the accusation police officer made was about attempted assault on a man and his child while the threat of arrest was about a civil matter. I presume that Todd Freed who send the policemen gave him instructions and scripted the entire policemen's action, the fact that is by itself extremely troublesome. To the best of my understanding this police action and the behavior of the police officer in my home were entirely unlawful. The officer, paid by taxpayers, acted as a common thug enforcing the interest of a private citizen who happens to be another thug attempting to illegally evict his neighbors from the property he covets but doesn't own, Right of Way worth approximately half a million dollars. We are still recovering from the trauma of the police unlawful intrusion into our lives, especially my wife who took it extremely badly since she never experienced anything of a sort in her life. The whole neighborhood is in shock. 3 The last incident including another case of false reporting to the police was this time around supported by follow-up of full assistance of the Southold police in support of the theft of property, a serious escalation of the events. I am sure you will understand my decision to from now on avoid any contact with police and speak to police only in presence of my lawyer. Other than very first encounter with the police when policemen didn't know who the Freeds were, the Southold police did nothing but threaten us in order to discourage reporting against the Freeds. Now the police is unlawfully invading even our home to threaten us in order to facilitate criminal possession of the influential land grabber. We are all seriously concerned about our safety. We have been living now for more than a year under a threat of violence without benefit of the police protection we pay taxes for. Now the police are themselves participating in unlawful intimidations in behalf of the Freeds and their criminal attempts at land grab. FYI, please find below an example from a larger body of evidence already submitted to the court. Please examine the picture I took from a distance while trying to avoid physical proximity of the Freed. I stayed away even though he was invading my house and confiscating my personal belongings, in spite of the fact that in that situation I had all the constitutional rights and the laws of self-defense on my side. I could have chosen to act differently and that entirely within the scope of my legally protected rights but I opted instead for severe personal restrain. Id q��'•+:.a �`µ +a�a�'g"€'?5'ter`° �., kc at «"�,xtr*��w"av.�'y ._.,y,�•,•,x �-. �a'..5.. i at'$"'�"e•., '^,.,,'„q, `x.�i" a« T'.zsS r 4 ;"��" :/} - ':,5• �`a�.2S1'<".. 3�"; Z;`^ p P".�oYY,a •� �•"'a'd�ct .•y,•R'•' ;,,., :�;h,�F, M,i< qq •4M .rym..^ . M y Y.5 d t" 2f"•v Ati`i``: ia' �r.4. .� �•*� .,• -.a;. tits`-a;=": »j^n23�:�� ..:s3';,�aF<,„ q %:X.y ' '.�::e3•!• � . M`'?�� s•d' "i-•4'•� ;a'j x': zd ,r M •�,\ 3 �;1W ls *n .'''z:r,.. ... " ;, ?•� , `:; _ '��.y' 3�z.•,k t '._ ° :'a Mq�;y. •"v. 2R �:za"....;::.r.� �b,�;<x;d`...,s�.,, � <,, —>�•s�,"��tc`;�.. <>.�'• 1t`�•' �'"'.cap roA •j°.5y � r�'rY'.:.P=:• 2•i:.;�")b,La:'.. va.S;�:.\ro• >M r':':W � `��. ; '� k v w� g»;.. •qp,p .. �`„•� �i.;,;r�y=x y ti z, `�.,4.ri, "•�'a;,„�aa: � •jr`k� 3 .� '>a�;v'•� �' .4.�.�. �:��d�`e'"l `. .;.....��x�`a•(�`�•yia,� ��i p.:p,�• „r�, '� �`F,a ��b�. '° ,uN .„•'4 :r`>�.i,:•��: •-.:r'�•rii P�..e E""..kxi:..i _ �k'�',�.;e;�'g.�`y4`�:S �. � �i �•""EsyP.�;. ':"�'<' 'HY'p<' ey.i: �.' i"�y`.:s, YiM•mg:,.. � ��. � >,u' ?' `�°;jt•:i.:;.,<• 1,'•'" .X:s ;''":.�. :.:•%',a.,;< �.rte.. z k,} • �:h.�i�.'C 3 may. .."?^m`� v `�Vis..F.'',•�� ,,Y0.„..<6. 4,°�;.-aa`s,'.,w"kn..a:===':.::a,„„s'< md'i�+T.'_�� In the above picture taken by me early in January 2014, Todd Freed, a certified corporate lawyer, in contempt of the Supreme Court issued Temporary Restraining Order against him is confiscating my personal belongings, threatening Barbara and trespassing on my property at 12355 New Suffolk Avenue in broad daylight in spite of the fact that he was warned to stay off my property.The Freeds are conducting law enforcement in the neighborhood as they see it fit—mostly breaking the law unchallenged by the Southold police. The police are categorically refusing to take or investigate any reports of misconduct by the Freeds. 4 Even the police cannot legally confiscate personal belongings of a private citizen as the Freeds are doing on regular bases, now for more than a year. The Freeds are hiring deputies, unknown individuals we can see on our security cameras, the trespassing strangers who are performing harassment tasks and confiscating our belongings in behalf of the Freeds when the Freeds are themselves not available to perform those acts of harassment. The toll on my family is not only physical but encompasses serious psychological harm and traumas that required treatment and may transform into other longer term health related problems. This is the only case I have ever heard of in which the police assists a squatter in his unlawful efforts to evict lawful residents off the property with physical force, threats of violence, threats of financial ruin with illegal prosecutions and all sorts of other kinds of intimidations. This is the only case I am aware of in which the police refuses the submitted evidence of forgeries and fraud and joins perpetrators in support of the obvious deceit instead of investigating and reporting the crimes to the District Attorney office. Thank you for you interest even though belated. Zarko Svatovic 646-232-6663 Attached below are relevant exchanges of e-mails: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To Southold Police From: Zarko Svatovic [mailto:svatovic@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 11:52 AM To: Lessard, Diane; Hulse, Lori Cc: Cantrell, Elizabeth; Nunemaker, Amanda Subject: Southold Police Incident report (relating to Case#01-13-004747) Hello. Can you please forward this e-mail to the interviewing officer or to the appropriate authorities in order to issue official reports reflecting below described incident. Thank you for your help! Zarko Svatovic 646-232-6663 5/26/2014 at 10:30 AM The complainant Zarko Svatovic of 12355 New Suffolk Av reports that on 5/26/2014 at 10:30 AM Todd Freed got out of his car and threatened Complainant with unspecified legal action in which Todd will take over not only the Right of Way he is trying to steal'but also the complainant's car and his house at 12355 New Suffolk Avenue. Quote Todd to Complainant: "Enjoy your house and your Subaru as long as you can, they will all be mine." Todd drove the car over the Right of Way even though Right of Way is limited to foot traffic now for more that 50 years. 5 Complainant was trying to put marker on the edge of the Right of Way. It is difficult to tell where the edge of the Right of way is since the Freeds destroyed the boundary that separated the two properties when they stole the property. * Todd after driving over Right of Way then destroyed two markers Complainant put into the ground. Complainant walked away because Todd was behaving irrationally and there was a danger that Todd might become physically violent and attack Complainant. As complainant was leaving, walking away, Todd was screaming threats after Complainant: Quote Todd to Complainant: "You have no idea what's coming ... " then some threats about Barbara I didn't get clearly but he was referring to his investigation of Barbara Best Tax records and how he will get her too. NOTE:The ownership of Right of Way is not in dispute.The Title Search of reputable Title Search Agency shows that the Freeds do not own and have no interest whatsoever in the Right of Way. The Freeds themselves never produced any documents whatsoever in support of their ownership of the Right of Way. The Quit Claim Deed filed with the Suffolk County that is trying to deceive by having same dimensions as the Right of way is a forgery without any backing and it doesn't even point to the Right of Way. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RE: Southold Police Incident report (relating to Case#01-13-004747) From: Zarko Svatovic 5/28/14 To: Hulse, Lori Thanks for the advice, but the police is the one who took part in the threatening. I will send you shortly a description of the second part of the incident. I have sent quite detailed description of my earlier experiences with the Southold Police to the Town Attorney's Office and the Town Board before. I did not receive response from anybody. After that I tried to stay away from the police and use other avenues to pursue my grievances. I was successful at avoiding dealing with the police until the last Monday, when I was bullied by highly incompetent policemen in my own living room because I made a mistake of inviting him into my house. I believed at first that he came honestly to investigating what happen. The policemen knocked on my door, asked me nothing, accused me of attacking Freed and his 4 year old son with a stick and threatened me with an eminent arrest if I don't stay off the Freeds Right of Way, all as it was, I presume, scripted by Todd Freed who send him. Of course, the whole thing made no sense. If the policemen came into my house because I attacked Freed and his son with a stick, what that had to do with me being arrested if I don't stay of the Freeds Right of Way?This was pure harassment and intimidation by the police in support of private economic interest, actually in support of criminal act of theft. I don't have to explain that the policeman's action was entirely illegal as it is Todd's personal relationship with enforcement authorities who stand by him while Todd enforces the law as he sees it fit to support the theft of the property. That story horrified the entire neighborhood. Nobody feels safe. Thanks for the advice though, Zarko 6 i i From: lori.hulse@town.southold.ny.us To: svatovic@hotmail.com Subject: RE: Southold Police Incident report (relating to Case#01-13-004747) Date: Tue,,27 Mary 201414:52:09 +0000 If you feel that you've been threatened,you should contact the police and report the incident. Lori Hulse ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Zarko Svatovic 5/28/14 To: Lessard, Diane, Hulse, Lori Cc: Cantrell, Elizabeth, Nunemaker, Amanda The Southold Police is refusing to take or investigate any complaints against the Freeds. This is my official report of the incident to the police for my records. In my earlier experience the reports I submitted to the'police at the station verbally about the Freeds were not reported or the reports did not state what I reported. This is the only option I have available for the time being to communicate with the police and have a record of what I reported.There is noting more that I need to say. However, if there are any outstanding questions regarding my report I will be very happy to answer. I will be sending copy of my reports to the other branches of government until I am confident that the Southold police is respecting the law and is not biased to private interests. ---------------------------------------------------------------- From: diane.lessard@town.southold.ny.us To: svatovic@hotmail.com; lori.hulse@town.southold.ny.us CC: elizabethc@town.southold.ny.us; Amanda.Nunemaker@town.southold.ny.us Subject: RE: Southold Police Incident report (relating to Case#01-13-004747) Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 18:39:22+0000 I would suggest that you call the dispatch number, 631-765-2600, and state that you would like to speak to an officer regarding'an incident which occurred on May 26th or you can come into headquarters and ask to speak to an officer here. I will not be forwarding this email on to anyone. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Flatley, Martin (mflatley@town.southold.ny.us) Sent: Thu 5/29%14 11:34 AM To: 'svatovic@hotmail.com' (svatovic@hotmail.com) Cc: Hulse, Lori (lori.hulse@town.southold.ny.us) Mr. Svatovic, I received a copy,of the email you sent to one of our Records Clerks at Southold Town Police Headquarters regarding an incident that took place on May 26, 2014. Please be advised that we cannot take reports via email at our department and that this information can only be documented by either calling our Dispatch at 765-2600 and asking to talk to a police officer or to stop at Hqs. to make a report. Martin Flatley Chief of Police Southold Town Police Department 41405 State Rt. 25 Peconic, N.Y. 11958 i March 17, 2014 TO: Board of Town Trustees Town Hall Annex 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY— 11971 MAR 2 0 2014 Att. James F. King, President Suvtl�o d lu�ri� Bob Ghosio Jr., Vice President RE: ILLEGAL PERMITS ISSUED for NON-EXISTENT PROPERTIES at 12400 New Suffolk Avenue address, Cutchogue, NY-11935 Prior to 2013 the property was associated with Tax Map#1000-116-6-12.0 The property was ILLEGALLY split into 1000-116-6-12.1 & 1000-116-6-12.2 ANNEXING THE NEIGHBORING LOT Dear Sir, This letter is to bring to your attention that on May 15, 2013 the Board of Trustees among others permits, issued an illegal Administrative Permit,#8178A,referring to an illegitimate property or non-existent lot#1000-116-6-12.2. The Tax Map was UNLAWFULLY changed in 2013 based on forged documents. The said unlawful activities are part of an ongoing fraud with the goal of stealing a half a million dollars worth of waterfront real estate property in Cutchogue. Please review attached: Letter to Patricia Moore Letter to Tax Map Division Please REVOKE ASAP all the illegitimate permits issued to the 12400 New Suffolk Avenue property and all the relevant letters to Patricia Moore in order to stop the unlawful work. Lots 12.1 & 12.2 are FRAUD and DO NOT EXIST. The unlawful activities involve forging of deeds, forging surveys and other documents and took place over a span of more than a year. Since it is not clear whether all the aspects of the fraud have been understood, every piece of information regarding the 12400 New Suffolk Avenue property must be treated with suspicion. In the'attached materials, Exhibits A to G,please find the documents we are aware of that need to be revoked. The integrity of our governing is,fundamental to the health of our society. ;h) s for your el , cc Town Attorney Southold Town Board Zarko Svatovic, 646-232-6663 12355 New Suffolk Ave., Cutchogue,NY— 1193 5 t March 17,2014 Ms. Patricia C. Moore,Esq. 51020'Main Road Southold NY 11971 RE: ILLEGAL PERNUTS REQUESTED BASED ON FRAUDULENT ISOCUMENTSIN-11M A 'TO's"S1V# 1000-16-6-12.0 12400 New Suffolk Avenue property, Cutchogue, NY Dear Ms. Moore: Presenting forgeries as legal documents is a fraud,a criminal acti_vi4L%gbjject to the criminal code of law. Lawyers are held to even higlrersfand"ards:'"' It has come to our attention that you have been allegedly submitting a fraudulent survey issued by,Peconic Surveyors,P.C.,Lic.N. 49618 referring to the 1000-16-6-12.0 lot situated at 12400 New Suffolk Avenue. The said lot 12.0 is certified by Advocates Abstract Inc#ADA2455-S Stewart Title Insurance Company. Please'review attached letter to Tax Map Division with supporting materials regarding: RE: j ILLEGAL CHANGE TO THE COUNTY TAX MAP IN 2013 IN'REFFENCE TO: i 12400 New Suffolk Avenue property, Cutchogue,New York Suffolk County Tax Map#1000-116-6-12 I By submitting the-said fraudulent surveys,you have,perhaps unwittingly became part of an ongoing conspiracy to commit fraud in order to steal half a million dollars worth of waterfront real-estate property. To the best of my knowledge,not knowing is not an accepted excuse. A Supreme Court of Suffolk County,the case against the owners of the 12400 New Suffolk Avenue property is for now a civil matter but in due time it may become a criminal matter as well. Zarko Svatovic, 646-232-6663 12355 New Suffolk Avenue cc. Deed holder to ROW Cutchogue,NY— 1193 5 Town Attorney svatovic@hotmail.com Southold Town Board Notary Public,State of New York No.01 HE6147148 f Ax u Qualified in New York County March 17, 2014 TO: Tax Map Division 360 Center Drive Riverhead, NY 11901 Att. Penny Wells LaValle David Triebs RE: ILLEGAL CHANGE-TO THE COUNTY TAX MAP IN 2013 IN REFFENCE TO: 12400 New Suffolk Avenue address, Cutchogue, NY-11935 Prior to 2013 the property was associated with Tax Map#1000-116-6-12.0 The property was ILLEGALLY split into 1000-116-6-12.1 & 1000-116-6-12.2 ANNEXING THE NEIGHBORING LOT I visited,the Tax Map Division in January 2014 and requested information, entitled to by Freedom of Information Act, about the above 2013 illegal change to the Tax Map. I was informed by the staff that there is no formal procedure to follow when requesting a Tax Map change, that there was no application made for the 2013 illegal change and that the requestor for the above ILLEGAL change is UKNOWN. I was not allowed to see or get the survey based on which the change to the Tax Map was made. The relevant record in Tax Map for Parcel ID NUMBER 1000-116-06-12,shows that parcel was illegally split into two lots 12.1 & 12.2. (Exhibits, Page 1 —Illegal 1000-116-06-12 lot split.) The ille 'gal split was evidently made based on a forgery: the survey done by Peconic Surveyors,the survey stamped as received on Nov 4, 2013 by Board of Trustees. (Exhibits Page 2, - Planning Board Letter states "no record of approved subdivision") (Exhibits Page 3, -Nov 4, 2013 stamped forgery,the survey by Peconic Surveyors) RETIRED/REPLACED PARCEL 1000-116-6- 12, Liber 12106 P 108, (Exhibits, Page 1) consisted of one lot, "115 feet wide and 300 feet deep more or less", as said in the,P108 deed and as referred to in the 2012 the Tax Roll record. (Exhibits,Page 4 - Liber 12106 P 108 deed, lot size 115 x 300) Lot 1000-116-6-12 115 x 300 feet was then SPLIT/replaced by 12.1 and 12.2 lots Lot was split into: 1000-116-6-12.1 115 x 300 Parcel 1 Liber 12718 P266 and (Exhibits, Pages 5&6 -Liber 12718 P266, lot 115 x 300) 1000-116-6-12.2 33 x 300 Parcel l Liber 12718 P267 (Exhibits,-Page 7&8, Liber 12718 P267, irrelevant Quit Claim deed with no conveyance whatsoever and not even referring to the said lot 12.2 at all) TOTAL of parts 148 x 300—DEFIES COMMON SENSE The said SPLIT defies common sense because the PARTS of the supposedly DIVIDED property when added are BIGGER THAN THE WHOLE. When combined together lot 12.1 lot and lot 12.2 lot are—30% bigger than the supposedly divided 12.0 lot. The 2013 forged survey also includes the land past the high water mark, supposedly to inflate the acreage in order to confuse and help with the deceit. The size and location of the 12.2 lot on the Tax Map is exactly the size and the location of the Private Road property, the 100 Year Old Right of way. The hand written mark on the Quit Claim deed, at the top right corner of the page, the deed referring to lot 12.2 indicates R/O/W. The deed doesn't make any sense, description referring to apparently some other location or no location at all. Furthermore, the Liber 12718 P267 QC deed was issued by the person that never owned any such property. This Quit Claim deed is a_s relevant to the ownership of lot 12.2 as a Quit Claim deed to Brooklyn Bridge would have been if it were put forth as the evidence of the ownership. (Exhibits Page 7&8—The Quit Claim deed FRAUD, an irrelevant deed referring to some non-existent and indefinable property, description referring to the neighboring Fitzgerald's land.) The current Tax Map is based on a forged survey, forged deeds and forged documents used in a criminal conspiracy to steal half a million dollars worth of real-estate property. The fraudulent Tax Map is unlawfully used as evidence of ownership in a Supreme Court lawsuit brought against alleged owners of 12400 New Suffolk Avenue property who illegally occupied the land. The Tax Map was used as an initial vehicle of the CON. We resoectfully request that the Tax Map be IMMEDEATELY corrected. The stolen property is the Private Road property=adjacent to the former property of Russell Case at 12400 New Suffolk Avenue address. The said Right Of Way is owned by the subdivisions of the Wickham Case estate. Wickham Case family is separate branch of an unrelated family to Russell Case family. (Exhibits, Page 9 &up-The Private Road property, 1946 Tax Map and other ROW related evidence. The undisputable evidence of the Private Road property ownership is in the Suffolk County public records. The deeds of all the neighboring property also clearly confirm-the ROW ownership by the former Wickham Case estate.) If you need anything to make those correction please let me know. Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions! cc Town Attorneys Thinks—for your he p Southold Town Board C Suffolk County Departments Deed holders to the ROW TarkoSvatovic, 646-232-6663 12355 New Suffolk Ave., 'U y Cutchogue,NY— 1193 5 Z©1 Notary Public,State of New York No.01 Hc6147148 aualitied in New York County j! - commission Expires May -3 aft) 7 TOWN OF V SOUTHOLD 8.5 17.A(c) 1.2A(c) IO 3.BA(C;) 12 3,60A(C)6'4 1A 9.1 5A(C) 26 1CME LAND TRUST 262. VION E-MAEIM zzz e» 2 1,0A 0 4,E, n • 0- gill3 WC) 251 2.9A(c) 2,GA(c) 1--- 9 g a 11 1, 17 21 s a 1.3A(C) CASE 2a I 12$ 181 V 22.3 32A(,)( 02 3 2 4 C 2.CA(C) TOM OPSqyjA2A() 0LD 4 16A(c) 'n 14— 17 L jZ1.1 0.2" AVE. 23,,�, 8.9A(c) 161 a lot 9 11 12.1 13 SAA(C)2 s a. 1.102 1,4A(c) 14 Q ie.1 4 ZZA(q) IA(c) %M(0) 2 DA(a), 17,1 16 11 14 1:7A(C)I 3A(C) to I 5.7,�C .1 (C 192 B oq rtw til i t 16A We TOM 46SOUTHOL mo 222 4 IA(c) TOWN NO so OLD PECONIC L SEE SEC.N0134 PQ 5 9eqy LA(c) A 5-170 E U COUNTY OF SUFFOLK @ K TOM4 OF SOUTHOLD SECTION NO NOTICE E mlom Oil KW wlbt YAINTEF(AhCA.-ALURMON ME OF; Real Property Tax Service Agency Y 110 116 IH %�t�GS OF DISMS"ON OF ANY VORTIONOF IrE County Canter RIVerhm".NY 11901 A UIXr �s 40 IF;mmnm ECALE04FECT 7190 ww, VAT VRffTEN PORNSSJON OF THE 0 m 403 A 13, DISTRIUND 1000 A�1-9 REM MP-.RTY TAX SFIMC9�St4y P 12) ucArrzcxesr PROPERTY MAP COkMPONGATe F.120.2013 STREET ADDRESS. 12400 NEW SUFFOLK AVENUE N SURVEY OF PROPERTY AT CUTCHOGUE � TMw TOWN OF S�OUTHOLD N.Y. SUFFOLK COUNTY, tURVEY 1000-•11 It-W$ F49R Cr E Ft N� 4p °'^+►� 77gjs. �eae PARCEL7 ! R , ! li `Lr � 'RCa t t / - � ' it � ly !i a - 2 O ar !1 s sat 11 2y� 1 iR.1$ �.l sq as na. i�fi dIL W fir `et`4'na oar's 11_ ` g'�p yV-7 f14. Ar It11 11 err \ A 11 4q ta2t* P�D��1� WqjRAmCE X5OAwe361OSGI 2.29 - I 4 EIEVATKBGS REFERENCED 70 NAVA.1988 ! �j. 77)ry• 7 . Aa►uWM Woa AmaWW iW SLRWr&A MAWW . N (TODD DED lF MWM 7=W OFAEW wwsralEEmrADW Ni Q8-f2 7DOD FREED �r Ar fst stmv sa�sewteW s AKL aaR7oKaos �Y �i Bbl EDT#Hffi7ER FREED Az455-5 /mdfal AhF VAKA fL0'TMQ ItM ANO OOa6 8EI@'may F "' �� ADVOCATES ABSTRACT INC SW MA O R CWJM M VC NO,Y SK OF RE Si raW STEWART 1111.E WSVRANCE compANC �lEdFaKK�Ek�I 0t !am lamPWr and rAe s7ANoaROs Raz atigrovaG 16T T101E DATA AND QdVS7RJt�A1 aIF 98BAAPFACE S[7VA0E ov mdx K"Ka OsAL srsmu5 Fm ovaE FAIAGr epf/Ks D>S mW rL aD7rfa by fhr aanditw oat forth thareh aad an ft �� mw a eu.a pamR to oonsleaeG rerona sra x AIa496�e Ifre Axnfion a/teas ead oezgroOls 3bom,hen""aro Y ham frid obssalafims mrd ar ban data O6tab d ban otAaa. .rcrrn ne aro sa C.AfA 19678 I a.u u S(4PYElA4$P.G PARaL 1 AFEA-50AID sm Fr.Tom uNE (631)76.E-1797 PARCEL 2 AFEA-K748 Sa FT_7b 7E LINE .-roNu T7Pzaw xAF yr smEFr '= SOWH LA Nr a7971 12 240 2012 - 2013 Comparison of 1000-116-6-12 in Southold Tax Rolls : Illegal Split 2012: property is i acre2013 DEED BOOK 3.271 PG-26)� :13';` This property is the community Right 2013: same property after illegal 3 '- of way(ROW).Property class 600 iS a Qtlit Claim, T13is property range designated as"community Split is 1.51 acres Vifas not C?vtned by conveyor. Services--Property used for the well being of the community"and 692 is a 4 There is NO address number Road/str/hwry on ROW property. This property was never part of ROW property was owned by 12400 New Suffolk Avenue Wickham Case family, a separate tamily trom Donald Case TCn?t »t'ctl:o-- ., ., .. ., ,, ,� ...,.,,�.a l,. 1,1•, ,..., _ ,rr..11 ,..1. I ,,,.. ^iBLZ; ,3TA.TC"z TAX !:F:: :;:'':EM'. »3%:iE"31:3 _. TC 7A q -P.Sc~F a•e. T, f7fi`r%F.F' sr,)?'':T'1 1„;A^':fJ1 n .,'AS^ A i'f? EXHIBITS Page 1 Illegitimate January 30, 2013, lot 1000-116-6- 12, Tax Map SPLIT Page 2 Letter from the Planning Board Office of Southold Town stating that no subdivision of 12400 New Suffolk Avenue property took place. Page 3 The FORGED survey of the 12400 Suffolk Avenue property a) The fraudulent survey shows 2 lots, Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 when only one lot, Parcel 1, was conveyed to Freeds in 2013 as lot 12.0. b) , Parcel 2 location in the survey matches the location and dimensions of the Private Road property of the former Wickham Case estate. c) The size of new 12400 New Suffolk Avenue property, 12.0 lot, after claimed supposed subdivision of lot 12.0 into two lots 12.1 & 12.2, is over—30% bigger than the original property which defies common sense. Page 4 Liber 12106 P108, Dimensions of the lot 115 x 300 feet Page 5&6 Liber 12718 P266, The same lot size and location as 12106 P108- Page 7&8 Forgery, Liber 12718 P267, meaningless Quit Claim deed referring to undeterminable location. The deed FAKES a reference to lot 12.2 by stating similar dimensions but points to unknown different location. Page 9 A1946 Tax Map of the Private Road property showing that it is owned by the Wickham Case estate. Page 10 The 1950's Agreement of the owners in common of the Private Road property, agreeing to limit the Private Road to foot traffic. George H. Case 12400 New Suffolk Avenue owner at the time, ancestor of Donald and Russell, is mentioned as being on the West border of the ROW, the Private Road. 12400 New Suffolk Avenue property never had and have no rights of any kind whatsoever to the ROW property. Page 11 Excerpt from the will of Wickham Case family, circa 1930's, - describing ownership of the Private Road property. The Wickham Case estate was subsequently subdivided into the lots with deeded rights to the current lot owners. (Note: The George Case family,an entirely different branch of the Case family from Wickham Case family,never had anything to do with the Private Road property. 12400 New Suffolk Avenue property is on the water and did not need Right of Way to access the bay.) ,r XPARCEL 1000 - 116 - 06 - 12 ID NUMBER 3a_ • "'gym 1:�f,;��;K'j.iG" Tai°.c%;I."'je 11 FM El CONDO ❑ COA X SPLIT El 102 El OTHER .=SEF 'S fCH I RETIRED PARCEL I 1000-116-06-12 <JEANNETTE CASE, DONALD G. CASE, DEBORAH A. [KAMINSKI] CASE DAVID R. CASE> L 12106 P108 CREATED PARCELS 1000-116-06-12.1 <TODD FREED &EDITH WEB STER FREED ux) Lid 7/L3' P �I Hist: L 12106 P 108 1000-116-06-12.2 <TODD FREED &EDITH WEBSTER FREED ux lam/ g"L P NOTE: AOC NEEDED FOR L 12106 P108 TO REFLECT 1000-116-06-12 (NOT 11) {o 22.3 { 150 _ 12 m 161 En A ' (0 O O ' rn o 7 0 ? 150 150 i 225 J 225 100 100 100 113 113 �o 5 0 6 13 14 22.1 22.2 100 100 100 225 113 113 16 i NEW SUFFOLK AVENUE 110 110 132 116 33 173 352s 51s j 3 10.1 X10.2 11 '12.1 c,,! 13 14 1.4A(c) 2.9A h 1.1 A(c) 1.2A(c) 1.2A (— (c) m �`° "' 15 F v � m M ^y rCo '1.1A(c N CD � P r N 1 82 140 132 1 € 175 1 58 173 _ 1 167s - GREAT SHORELINE/ PE _ CONK SAY Date: January 30, -2013 U 100 mo Q0 Mapper: Dave T. Checker: h KAHANG ADDRESS: P"NNING BOARD AEMERS s 9k. ,.fit P.O.Box 1179 DONi%D J.IWILCENSKI Southold,NY 11,971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: NY `TV311TAX J.CUMEW Town Hall Annex g PIERCK RAVIrIERTY 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III 4, u, (cor.Main Rd.&Youngs Ave) MARTIN H.SIDOR Southold,NY Telephone-631765-1938 r,ax.631765-3136 FLAT MNG BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 27,2014 Ms.Barbara Beat Mr.Zarko Svatovic 12355 New Suffolk Avenue Cutchogue,NY 11935 Re: Request for review of 12400 New Suffolk Avenue SCTM#1000.116-6-12.1 Zoning District:R-40 Dear Ms. Beat&Mr.Svatovic: As requested,the Southold Town Planning Department has reviewed Planning Board records regarding the above-referenced prop"and has not found any record of an approved subdivision to divide 12400 New Suffolk Avenue into the two lots currently showing on the tax map as SCTM#1 000-116-6-12.1 &SCTM#1 000-116-6-12,2. If you have any questions regarding the above,please drynothesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, Alyxandra Sabatino Planner cY nt owners of jeo land pGep rom he Wickha in, VV 6r On 1,4 00 4 9 Casrc., Estate have •., a deeds to he strip of land shown k p eically spam N center of this ' section of this 19146 Cutch- ogueTax apo .12400�� New uffo9l( Ave is RPJKD labeled "'Case Bros" on ils "nap. The C�(J,� StaadatB N.Y.B.T.U.Form 8005"3—Executor's Deed—lantvidual of Corporation(srnsle sheet) '41'x, � J Q GC .� ,VOUR tAWVW MON SIONMO THIS INSTRUMANW—TNtf MTMMWT SHOPAD iE USED BY t.AWV M ONLY. 1 f oe THIS INDENTURE,nude the ! day of DECEMBER KX01MKUM1ZK& 2000 BETWEEN RICHARD K. CASE residing at 4516 N. 2nd Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85013 as executor of the Estate of RUSSELL B. CASE the last will and testament of RUSSELL B. CASE,12400 New Suffolk Ave., Cutchogue, New York .lateof patty of the first part,and ,deceased, DONALD CASE residing at 13180 Oakmont Drive (11, Fort Meyers, Florida 33907;• DONALD G. CASE residing) at 2143 Morrilton Court, Orlando Florida; DEBORAH ANN KAMINSKI rediding at S.W. First Avenue, Cape Coral, Florida 33914; And-DAVID-R. - CASE;-•1602 Sable Sands Court, Sanibel, Florida 33957 all as Tenants in Common. party of the second part. WiTNF.SSETH.that thi party of the first part,by virtue of the power and authority given in and by said lad will and testament,and in consideration of Six Hundred Twenty Five Thousand Dollars as appraised and as devised in PARAGRAPH THIRD of the said will. *ARM does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part,the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot,piece or parcel of land,with the buildings and improvements thereon erected,situate, lying and bang in the Hamlet of Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, and as dispersed as follows: A parcel of land 115 feet wide by,300 feet deep more or less; bounded on the"North by New Suffolk Avenue, east now or formerly by Carruthers, south by the Great Pecohid Bay, and west now or formerly by Plimpton. BEING AND INTENDED to be the same premises conveyed to the above named decedent by deed dated July 11, 1979 and filed in the Office of the Clerk of Suffolk County under libgr 8662 of deeds at page 269 TOGETHER with all right,title and interest,if any,of the party of the first part of,in and to any strata and roads abutting the abovedescribed Premises to the center lines thereof;TOGETHER with the appurtenam:ea, and also all the estate which the Said decedent had at the time of decedent's death in saidprenusa.and also the state there,which the party of the first part has or has power to convey or dispose ot,whether individ- ually,or by virtue of said will or otherwise;TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part,the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part his not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been incumbered in any way whatever,except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part,in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law,covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consid- eration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same or any other purpose. The word"patty"shall be construed as if it read "parties"wbenecer the sense of this indenture so requires. 1N WrrNFSS WHEREOF,the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day-and year first above written. IN raasaxca or: E AT 0' RUSSELL B. ASE BY: RIMARD K. CASE, EXECUTOR X1(9 F- F-112. 75 THIS INDENTURE,made theday of Geteber 2$ BETWEEN Jeannette Case,as survivor of Donald Case,Deceased,residing at 13180 Oakmount CCA M Drive,Apartment 1,Fort Myers,FL 33907,Donald G.Case,residing at 2143 Morrison Court, i 1 Orlando FL,Deborah Ann Case f/n/a Deborah Ann Kaminski,residing at S.W.First Avenue, Cape Coral FL 33914,and David R.Case,residing at 1602 Sable Sands Court,Sanibel,FL 33957,as tenants in common, party of the first part,and 1�fr Todj Freed and Edith Webster-Freed, as jo residing 00 Fifth Avenue,Apartment 9A,New York NY 10029 F f• party of the second part, WITNESSETH,that the party of the first part,in consideration of ten dollars paid by the party of the , y- �• second part,does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part,the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot,piece or parcel of land,with the buildings and improvements thereon erected,situate,lying and being in the (See description attached hereto) fv E /`v C `�7 A C r e t Being the same premises which was conveyed to Donald Case,Donald G.Case,Deborah Ann Kaminski and David R.Case,as tenants in common by Deed dated December 1,2000,recorded March 7,2001,in Liber 12106 Cp. 108. 6nJ �htahmtXly Being the same premises known as and by number 12400 New Suffolk Avenue,Cutchogue,NY. TOGET14ER with all right,title and interest,if any of the party of the first part in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof;TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises;TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part,the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever,except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part,in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law,covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consideration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word"party"shall be construed as if it read"parties"whenever the sense of the indenture so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parry of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: Jaidmette Case Donald G.Cas Deborah Ann Case f/n/a Deborah Ann Kaminski David R.Case Title No.ADA-2455-5 SCHEDULE A-DESCRIPTION ALL that certain plot,piece or parcel of land,situate,lying and being in the hamlet of Cdtchogue, Town of Southold,County of Suffolk and State of New York,being more particularly bounded'and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of New Suffolk Avenue at the intersectioa:'of the• northwesterly comer of the subject premises and the northeasterly comer of premises now or formerly of The Plimpton Family LLC; THENCE along the northerly side of New Suffolk Avenue South 76 degrees 58 minutes 29seironds East 115.75 feet to land now or formerly of Carruthers;'6� F v R D ,I:Q THENCE South 13 degrees 01 minute 40 seconds West 444.51 feet to the mean high waterline of Great Peconic Bay, THENCE along the mean high water line of Great Peconic Bay North 68 degrees 42 minirtes 01 second West 117.11 feet to land now or formerly of The Plimpton Family LLC; THENCE along said land North 13 degrees 02 minutes 50 seconds East 427.66 feet to the northerly side of New Suffolk Avenue at the point or place of BEGINNING. TVAE FORC-CEp 50RVF-Y •T-FIF LAND Q E Y D ND HIGH -330 -T-0 42 -7 - 661 12 `� � � PAP Qc �- 2 47 ro Q V 1 or ao�3 THIS INDENTURE,made the day of :-1 y''v 20R CIA 1BETWEEN Jeannette Case,as survivor of Donald Case, Deceased,residing at 13180 Oakmount Drive, Apartment 1,Fort Myers, FL 33907, Donald G. Case,residing at 2143 Morrison Court, Orlando FL, Deborah Ann Case f/nla Deborah Ann Kaminski,residing at S.W. First Avenue, Cape Coral FL 33914,and David R.Case,residing at 1602 Sable Sands Court, Sanibel,FL 33957,as tenants in common, party of the first part,and �Jse y,,j A-o Tod.4 Freed and Edith Webster-Freed, residing 200 Fifth Avenue,Apartment 9A,New York NY 10029 • party of the second part, WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of ten dollars paid by the party of the second part,does hereby remise,release and quitclaim unto the party of the second part,the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot,piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate,lying and being in the See Legal Description attached hereto which is incorporated by reference as though set forth in full. SUBJECT TO all easements, rights of way and protective covenants of record,if any. Being the same premises which was conveyed to Donald Case,Donald G. Case,Deborah Ann Kaminski and David R.Case,as tenants in common by Deed dated December 1,20.00,recorded March 7,2001,in Liber 12106 Cp. 108. +• N OT T 1% V E Being the same premises known as and by number-12400 New Suffolk Avenue,Cutchogue,NY. TOGETHER with all right,title and interest,if any of the party of the first part in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof;TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises;TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part,the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever,except as aforesaid. The word"party"shall be construed as if it read"parties"whenever the sense of the indenture so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: Je ette Case ,Donald G.Case Deborah n Case f/n/a Deborah Kaminski avid R. Case 7 ALL that certain plot,piece or parcel of land,situate,lying and being in the Hamlet-of Cutchogue, Town of Southold,County of Suffolk and State of New York,being more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a monument on the northerly side of New Suffolk Avenue at the northeasterly corner of the premises described herein and the northwesterly coaxer of the premises now or formerly of Shawn and Nicole Fitzgerald; THENCE South 13 degrees 01 minute 40 seconds West 449.31 feet to the mean high water line of Great Peconic Bay; THENCE along the mean high water line of Great Peconic Bay North 68 degrees 42 minutes 01 second West 33.35 feet; THENCE North 13 degrees 01 minutes 40 seconds East 444.51 feet to the northerly side of New Suffolk Avenue; THENCE along the northerly side ofNew Suffolk Avenue South 76 degrees 58 minutes 20 secoinds East 33.00 feet to a monument and the point or place of BEGINNING. NOT EVEN RE FE R I W er x; tho Same hereby is modii iod, to road an f ollo"a.o Present a owners ogotb®r with a ,froo and unobstruat9a use, lay � MmOtt with ether owners of a r'jgbr�®of-Way, .dor p aeaagm' '°t. OD �'aat _o�ti�' eortaiti -9privaty Rand tiro (2) rods in � 0��' parcels I Width,a� =jU'g frcRu Ne" Suffolk Avonup In a Southar:j r d2rectibn to Paconio Day® Said right-mr-wap bong � nom, n pp � � , 8 � houncioa one the North bg R6W Suffolk Avonuo® oto tho '�� ,h�� h ro l� a �, � i1 .9aet bT ,land of eevorly King; on tiro SAuth by Fvconic 'Bay"- and on, th6 West by land of the Estdt© of George H'a. Cadeb dabeasedo and tho Northarj r and of ealcl �3 [} q �j rlght-of-"Y 17ing approximately eight (8J foot Past f a m ii�i � o Wic k h a if in of the VOLUt oppoelto the �aeterjy 'jjno or the prom9soa horaby conveyeda ° , Down ITS WIT arQ the parties horfl�o 'have ho �� e r f reg E� ii c xounto sot UOIX• hande and seals the day,and Yeixr .fir-at abovo wIttbn,o Lrec,,-.,-k to C'2` r 9 nor-Ch m New Su olk C 0AvAmo 31e ,In- h e , ZOSO)p %111anguaae in "Cheir a. ar Sao Mae) a ee da c.. • r � .. .tmarlont ARU h B, ane W3LL LOO.FOaN T2jT@T F7lZ RLnG+L.[SlLL =C✓CC 'LMr Lea 44 ' �swt,tj MAR CUM. CfPDilIND NIEF'CiERK P}' 'I a CCI3FiiAa'i B. CASE, or G17tcnocte, ofihc Tom of Scasw1d, itr'tltr Gnarly of Surrolk rnrrt.SYrrtC of Raw]York, brrn of.nrurrl 111ij et.71,11 jrdeiuonJ r7o�rtcrl a, /drtliliSli mid rtErlrm'.: 'his MY IMSt`� i{3� i` tiii°� ,in trtmrrter 71t s � t�T M�err,T�s t owe tra rd in'wr""t L-1 X11 'th&t url?c t or n:ra c2 of 1 qa3 S L i rz i :ti ,..:e c;=•rr: 01, OF 52t?''o'i3: /---� A.-L- S±::`T- cd, ':i' �rj:'t:�y01Yt� X1:1 •{.,tig>.�Rr..? 1,.t i{yLi�. ��1LE��.t�'`�Y t Y1' !"Lai 7'f :��-•}t1< .Z'al"i: .'L7: z'F;cl�; iLl:.i t3"r'l --.r..rr:4f"a=t r ;��= t'-:t+� on . t yr 9�tit'�ar{r by =h1,' lit. ofpr17 by '.`ut�r�o-,a I nre. ~ ."r{7.^.^..":}. Ttt _,, 1,C»a::f Q'!••6 IIT ."' � `dS:;r!i92:L :' T v�O.t:= `u 9 � FLS.Uti,�r3fl, _.1• G'� ./'`. Wit''•` nti'l'' (l Iia-t�151:� i^. }S'?ri' in ALT j'11%t tnr:Qt Qr 7Q Vat t7ztSGbd �:aSs'T. <'I:.' iGG.s7 p:t.�-`•I:loa lin Vv, Tom o of r-1 r»,��'Y.�IUt?dt� rin! de-:CiSi3ed A8 :::�;".'• ��• �'i'\:e�. r.'-Sl^ •�.'� 1.1�;� ,t..••t -.-'k,;5'•ut1•t. t r r ,.. by ;. 'r Sut'iolk Avenue X11 Tol,^xli',';,+t- "T4.`:l F"vrS 3 G;"lnn•7 fifty �'n«t 3,27 1-t4tta :?ni3i ni, to ,rtL;:.::$'C`i �' t'::1 ir`J'1i.3F*� ;r' ?'t:l og'" cflo'' Bros-flit Sn1T1• lat•:. io-- ly SAVA +l v .'.Lny; Ani ;IP .".TT T7t ' o It- Or Or T"' A one. t31$rA tIt -rr-st ill All zti,t t;r-tet Or arc-? � of 1^gi: 2.$,ie.1, in vi1$ Tc-t of loilt'lol di-Comity of Sqj j o . yAC11a A. �� "' ':J L:� ;tut qF ►:l3' .3,`C '.k�T: Sly, :`ti LX clta3`-��dY o;t iS£t 2'tly ?gti --lo-r.3 .7y Ii 1•'`, U1 O141A:3 '!130rP'� ,'3t�?'F t' _.t{•!z• j,3?t1'i: h;r 'r?'+�' Sulfaljt AvczrltFl naafi 7at3t b,f Do , F),rr2fck® -.S -md mectlo r . 11 a. Arteamtp4l 9tilttttt`'AI :flo ?� %� 1i� tL1=Lr ::"it.r t31` 1ni1 At' ^v1IrG?if3l:ita'$=iJw': of �.`.~i14��s +11.' s tzlk e of Her Ysrk y nMJun lff L:tar tl as �$B �=1,l ':^':�•G;' t'l ii.. -•m-.,:•I't'-Tn9+ 'iV IrOWN of '11i? 1'!13'aonnFe; �C��el v' iC•Ln7�� ^a: G:r:'Je c:'3•' Ari-I t*-ruRTt I-Fet:fernonlrtVle, t(n9t ?1Y 1++••.•=. 44' 1'1u-.-'e urf:pr 7 -;r '1+:2.11'_ ,no r^t rps:F-nt,ttton F':+ to arnp fol-i_nr.- n ny w-t"- " ti:?a rr.-.:t ii-lar :47? -'r, n Cn:1cle am contd:Snit-il -q,Clijr, =::'tz•s •3 •rf.+ - +'•, '•L71�P�t:L...:a 3r�31:uQf,'T.;eT OCCa�i,:%L 1JtT "ilY'j:iT:3 17. .'•,�� 4iytjon :i S- fl 1`t,f} Jr t,fi:;i 4,7 7^+' ".,� T S' '-C" a S*?! has+•', t Pt?T='n t by 1r-`4 L'it+';a:;'i, :1 +Tfi�.. '�n `' r �Y'F'=IRV�-.•;wtSi:l �i:ilii'C�Tb� L''.ttCtlO:il:�:' :#P',i9t�RL:t.. 3::b +;•.r r,rgci. err ilrt"Ct`? of 'im-, -XrA i nn13'2+i t.,•t s 1 r=; l'a+s ,']L 4:i lti at (.L: teboi uie,in the SrTJ' O" got,"holik., L'�':it`•' 3` �.. `011_ ani :",t— C-^ Ne- ' or,cpbmirdeft nr,'t r?YC``iL, L Y-^• f, .110 ?:i11J 41` +ifl.":1, fat"Y;FA-ni>rf?T v -Un2'4-! by f•.c1:i -f johij r /1 EXHIBIT A: Below is the Planning Board Office letter stating that the 12400 New Suffolk Ave Subdivision is ILLEGAL. Subdivisions are approved based on Chapter 240 of the Southold Town code, http://ecode360.com/5160245 and according to the Town Planning Board's published procedures. a MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS F} ` �. r P.O.Box 1179 DONALD J.WILCENSKI Southold,NY 11977. Chair " OFFICE LOCATION: WILLiAMJ.CREMk-(S Town Ball Annex j PIERCE RAF'rERTY a� 51375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III (car.Main Rd.&c Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR ?� �; . (�' "�� S©ntbtrld,I41r Telephone:631765-1938 Fax"631766-3136 I PLANNING BOARD-OFFICE TOWN Or, SOUTHOLD i 3 February 27,2014 Ms. Barbara Beat Mr.Zarko Svatovic 12355 New Suffolk Avenue Gutchogue,NY 11935 Re: Request for review of 12400 New Suffolk Avenue SCTM#1000-116-6-12.1 Zoning District:R-40 Dear Ms. Beat&Mr. Svatovic: As requested,the Southold Town Planning Department has reviewed Planning Board records regarding the above-referenced property and has not found any record of an approved subdivision to divide 12400 New Suffolk Avenue into the two lots currently showing on the tax map as SGTM#1000-116-6-12.1 &SGTM#1000-116-6-12.2. If you have any questions regarding the above,please do not hesitate to contact this € office. Very truly yours, a E Alyxandra Sabatino E Planner I , EXHIBIT B: The Certificate of Compliance shown below is illegal. The lots 116-6-12.1 & 12.2 are illegal and do not exist. .Fame F.icing,President *��tf S �Q+ ',5Pawn 57 IWI ntex Road Bob G•hosia,Jr.,Vice-Pr dont Ar 'v PO.BOX 1179 Dave Bergen � � Southold„New York 11671.4$59 Alm Bredemeyer `1'elc,pht,ne(631)766•1892 Miehael.F.Domino � Fax t"X)?65-6641 B ARID OF TOWN TR11tSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE #q#d l 1 C Date;I&$,201:3 THIS CCC['CIFi[1 S that the re sr mainter�L of establushsd foot aratit which i lode. sereadiUS out c)f wcgdchi salon be pith At 124(1(1 New Sutfolk r1;vreaue CuMPLue.N--.-W Ynzlc Suffolk County Tax Mlap#116,6-12,1&12.2 Conforms to the application for a Trustees Permit heretofore filed in this office Dates!Mav 1,2013 pursuant to which Trustees Administrative Permit#8178A DOW May 15,2013,was issued(and conforms to all of the requirements and conditions,of the applicable provisions of taw. The project for which this certificate is being issued is for the regular maintenance of establishesfc�ot oath w icbinclude preadi t,nf•wavdclti— a can2 t ath. The certificate is issued to TCfAJ)(REED owner of the aforesaid property. _____. uhc►rized Signa re EXHIBIT C: This letter is based on an illegal SUBDIVISION SCTM# 10007116-6-12.1. The matter may be reconsidered only after the property is legally defined. J&M 14.we&meyer III,pmiaem Town H,411 Annex Mjdvaei j.Vtmino,Vwe-Presidnnt 5 Amft 26 James F f<lftqP.a Box'1179 Cwes 1.sandArt Southard,W 11911. (6311)7664802 Fax�631)7435-61lal I BOARD OF'fONVIN TRUSTFES TOWN OF 50IM1013) Ftbruary 2%2014 M%Patricia c.mooro,Esq, 61020 Main Road Soutfwld,NY 11971 RE- TODD FREED&EDITH WEDSTERFREED 12400 NEW SUFFOLK AVENUE,9UTCH013Urz The Southard Tq��"RqjIr�t pf'rt"toes Mwiewvd tft sur ay dates 0ecembet 3,2013, and detwmined tho pfoposed dmiling and sefnftary 3Wem am oiA at the Weilom jurisdiclipri Lindef Chapter 275 of the Tom Weiland Code area chapter 111 of the Tom code. Theref",In accordance vA[h to correat Wellarlds COdO(ChaPter 275)and ft Coasta]Erosion id rd Area(Chaptar lil)rto perrWA h required. Pfea,%a bo ndfind, onstfuctio;1,SeCjrnanjatrqtj,of disturbance of any kind may tike place sea id tl Old fidal anftr ffflShWatulr vwcddnds jurisdtctial b*un'd3FY Or s0awafd of tiae coastal erosion hazard am as indicated aNwe,or wiffiFln I CO'landward from the top of the bluF.Without iurlhw authorlzat;on from the Southold Town BoaTd of T"t"s pursuant to Chaptor 275 arid/OF CtI3001'111 oftho Tem Coda, it is your resprtsibirlity, to ensure that all necesawy prc=gows are takeh to pr eA any sedimentation OF other aMra"or dfaWrjsunca to tho ground Surfer or vegotaffQrt vftla Tidal Wettand$ jtwiedkflon and ecoctal EToctan Hazard kea,wwd,may rawft from yow project.Such gTewWorm may Includo riuintwniriq adqVate wGjk af);'a between Ihfi tidal wot3nd ju"dictlanal boundary and ille coastal hazard area and your prp)&I or erecting, a temporary fence,bartwel,or hay bate berm, -n-rws&tor"lingon is not 0 doWrmination from any olheringencY, kf you have any furffierquosvoa,please d6 not hcmaitata to CO. John PAL Bredevnert Ill,President BOOM of'Trusteas J(08=nn EXHIBIT D: This letter is based on an illegal SUBDIVISION, SCTM#116-6-12.1. & SCTM#1 16-6-12.2. The Letter must be retracted. J4=1 R Mg,PmuVwnt QfJf Town TUR Anvx 6-t=1,141 Ticad &A Jr-Vita-pmi&'Lt P.O.aox t1^0 P�w fW-ewn S4u1WdNewYwk VIVII-091A X+n BT-le M-YPr TeIrPNau,(011 7WIAIe. 11MULD OF TMN� TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTKOLD November 8.M3 palrfete,C-tjooro,Esq. 9ID20 Main Road southotdMY 11911 RE, TOD6&EDITH WEBSTER-FRM 42400 NEW SUFFOLK AVENUE,CUTCHOGUE SCTMN 116-6-W&12.2 Dear Ms.Moore. the Southold Town Dowd of Trustees reviewed the survey Prepared by Pomoic Surveyors,P.0last dated Svp1omtor 6,2013,card Portomiod a FWd Impection on �NovetqWr U,2013 to fbq the landward add*of the jurisdictional boundaq One And determined twat any proposed veafsunplunderbrush aCtNity located landward of It-is kap ng is out at am wesand mWiction umet chapter 276 of the Towr WoMwW Coda and C4vpW 111 of the Town Code. Therefore,In a=tdavoe with the currentlNettaods 0:4o JChapter 275)and the Coastal sion Hawdarea(Chaptor'1111)no pemlt Is required. PleasobeadMed. t*wew,OW no con n,swimentaiian,or d6-tuftnce at any WM nay take place seaward of%a tidal and/or lrashwaW winds jurisdictional boer4ary or seamrd of tho cQ35IgI erosion hazard area as indicated abovo.or whin 1100 landward from the top of the bluff,wiftut further authorization from the Souftkl Tom Board of Trustees pumuant to Chapter 276 ar&*r Chapter III of the Town Cade, It Is your mpomibillly to eirAire that an necessary ptecadions am t0on to;xovont any sedfrrmt-rilkin or other alteration or d4ttutiarma to the ground sutfam or vegaMfiDn wittin TWI Wetlands iurlsolcton anal Coaml L-rosiDn Hazard Asea,"Ich may rosult from your project.Such precauOns may inctude tnalataWing adequate work area between the tidal watiand jurisdicAionat boundary and the coastal erosion fiazard area stW y=project orerodfig a temporary fence,barrier,or bay bale bam A copy of the survey with the approximate tcatle-,l Of the 1120M9 Wormed by thet Uoard of Trustees is anclosed for your records. this detemlination is not a deteWnation from my otter agency. if yotk have any fLgfiwr questions,please do not 11051tate to call. /J81M:F.king,D&derd BoardotTrusteas JFK.eac EXHIBIT E: This letter is based on an illegal SUBDIVISION,.SCTM4116-6-12.1. & SCTM#116-6-12.2. Todd Freed and Edith Freed DO NOT OWN the propeEty as defined. The Letter must be retracted. OF IM r.1 CAITON: Siftjf�y� ' i4Tr�I1..NG r't1.1DRFS`�: Town Hall An �.� IreP.U,BOK 1179 54376 Mute RouW 25 Southold,NY 11971 (c4)r-Main Rd.lei Youngs Ave.) � Telephone:631766-1928 Southold,NY 11971 Fax:631 76€•3181: LOCAL WATEYv1,P O .,NT RFVITAt..1ZN1 LON PR,t7►GRAuM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM D EVE ii-'; To; Jinn King,President i j Town of Southold Board of Trustees ei i WO 14 From: Mark Terry. Principal Manner LWRP Coordinator sc�Rnai2 r--,� Date: May 14,2013 Re: Administrative Permit for TODD FREED SCTM#1 Otit1-116-6-12.1&12.2 TODD FREED requests an Administrative Permit for regular maintenance of established foot path which includes spreading out woodchips along the path. Located:12400 New Suffolk Avenue, Cutchogue- SCTM#116-6-12.1&:12.2 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268,Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Codas and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program(LWRP)Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department,as well as the records available to me,it is my recommendation that the proposed actions are CONSISTENT with the Policy Standards and therefore CONSISTENT with the LWRP, Pursuant to Chapter 268,the Board of Truster shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Lori Hulse,Assistant Tower Attorney q i C EXHIBIT G: Freeds violated the rules stated below but were not sanctioned for the violation. The inspection was instead approved retroactively on the Property Freeds DO NOT EVEN OWN. fan=$F.King,Pm'gj 1t � �� 'town 11,9lI,53095 Main ltd. Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vicr-Pri*ide t sa P.o.Hox 1179 Dave Bergen Southold.Ny 11971 John Bred Byer � 'telephone(631)765-1892 6 khael J.Dani Fax(63.1)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOL,D YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK,TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. FAILURE TO dO SO SHALL BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND POSSIBLE REVOCATION:OF THE PERMIT. INSPECTION SCHEDULE Pre-construction, hay bale line 161 day of construction comtrmted ajed complete,compliance inspection EXHIBIT G1: Photograph of Community Right Of Way taken April 30, 2013, before maintenance permit work was approved for the property Freeds DO NOT EVEN OWN. c a a f :.;Ise .