Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-8197 zzz- John M. Bredemeyer III, President ' Town Hall Annex Michael J. Domino, Vice-President =�� ®Gyp "- 54375 Route 25 Glenn Goldsmith o P.O. Box 1179 A. Nicholas Krupski o 0 Southold, NY 11971 Charles J Sanders Telephone (631) 765-1892 zzur Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date/Time: v 2 l Completed infield by: I)vL Compliance Inspection of GEORGE YATRAKIS for Wetland Permit#8197 for the condition of a 90% survivability rate of vegetation planted within the non-disturbance buffer area for two years. Located: 18805 Soundview Avenue, Southold. SCTM# 1000-51-1-14 CH. 275-3 - SETBACKS WETLAND BOUNDARY: Actual Footage or OK=q Setback Waiver Required 1. Residence: 100 feet 2. Driveway: 50 feet 3. Sanitary Leaching Pool (cesspool): 100 feet 4. Septic Tank: 75 feet 5. Swimming Pool and related structures: 50 feet 6. Landscaping or gardening: 50 feet 7. Placement of C&D material: 100 feet TOP OF BLUFF: 1. Residence: 100 feet 2. Driveway: 100 feet 3. Sanitary leaching pool (cesspool) 100 feet: 4. Swimming pool and related structures: 100 feet Public Notice of Hearing Card Posted: Y / N Ch. 275 Ch. 111 SEQRA Type: 1 II Unlisted Action Type of Application: Pre-Submission Administrative Amendment Wetland Coastal Erosion Emergency Violation Non-Jurisdiction Survey <_ 5 years: Y/N Wetland Line by: C.E.H.A. Line Additional information/suggested modifications/conditions/need for outside review/consultant/application completeness/comments/standards: AA 1001 Present were: J./Bredemeyer M. Domino G. Goldsmith 4- N. Krupski C. Sanders Other Page 1 of 2 John Bredemeyer, President �oguFF91,r4, Town Hall Annex Michael J. Domino, Vice-President was 54375 Route 25 James F. King y ; P.O. Box 1179 Charles J. Sanders • Southold, NY 11971 Dave Bergen ��'oiya°� Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection/Work Session Report Date/Time:� Compliance Inspection of GEORGE YATRAKIS for Wetland Permit#8197 for the condition of a 90% survivability rate of vegetation planted within the non-disturbance buffer area for two years. Located: 18805 Soundview Avenue, Southold. SCTM# 51-1- 14 Type of area to be impacted: � � Saltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland (/Sound Bay Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: Chapt.275 Chapt. 111 other Type of Application: Wetland Coastal Erosion Amendment Administrative Emergency Pre-Submission Violation Notice of Hearing card posted on property: Yes No Not Applicable Storm Water Management Review: Yes No Not Applicable Info needed: Modifications: Conditions: �� Present Were: ,/J. Bredemeyer vial. Domino_&ZJ. King�. Sanders c,,eBergen Bay Constable Other Form filled out in the field by -AL-_ , Mailed/Faxed to: Date: r Jg pror 47 AP 10/31 /2014 9 : 57 tt t .•9 '• . , tee. ,may ,_. 1, � ��,a". ��� `f��'�-'�" 1'1,���'II�V �` i S •� ; Ni 40 ta. � . .: -s�i�'S Baa- eQ r� .. nA,•,•"''�.. ,�+. k J ♦ P f f�� ;r7� _ .. . '•-. +; - r fes. A4 i V I '� - �!•_ ' •� - 'r a.+. }„8: a. .:} _ •'_ -.� �'.- - ya _,ls�ie�'=. .s tea- �a•.- s ..- - •��. � � '�►% � • ,- � ` .� � ice"� ' )- � . . -•' �' r .+fix •, 1 �V� r4" �" -�y•r~ �( "''jP•\' ,s _ ��• �''�'�' �'� e � •.1}� a t. ��' �� ���.i �+r` .yt't_ yt ____—.1 ,+s3w.}-� � }(('�h 1° `• _ .�•`�� � i {{ ,��";,�` 1..�. I'�;� ��, M �1 J 1 1��i /!'.r?.t �� •- -''` �, , �1+®/31 /20.14 9' 58� �" �' .� ,� 1 !• R Y-36A,it • 7 �,� 4� r••rte �`,•��t��Ak - � j�• c.� .. �. �. 5d f � 'ti .. �'7 � kti•'y< elk - •� � - i - ;mss-' i1 -. '�irt +t "'{�„�:�_ + AV ..1..0";'.31/2 0-14' 9 59` . •1 � � � � �.♦ 't moi, �.�-,i � '��, �Y �'`4' 7.1 � ,� -�.► r Y���-� `ill\\ /�t :'teM-awm,;, or _ AAA ,.. 77 � � ,.. �,,� � � ;-•��s .mss- , - '. � �.,.�. / pie� rR„ y •'�'i..-+.�---i�•Y ,.{�,s"'Lr,,.i e.,� .. M R s.: "V14 777. �. , _ ; ��, „ . ��• ��.,. ,� u ?� i .2014 eorge Yatrakis 0f18805 Soundview Avenue,Southold - -SCTM#51-1-14 - 10/31/14 - d& _ i v. 3xr x �. _ _ _ mss.-.',�� ,y z .9' - `�,• 9 s. 4 ' v George 18805 Soundview Avenue,Southo 1 owl f• j� 9'M:� Ali►_ t sr r •�. r �. X� Air `1/14 ,iiia^ 40. 1ir WI 4 t _ ". _ '"� s mss. +�• E .• � - �- C 7 Owl �_ .__,. �. .. .-. ,:' _ ,rte'. ,:.. - • - _ '�P'-�� -_�- i T - 1�©/31I2`014 10u; John M. Bredemeyer 111, President SufF014-c Town Hall,53095 Main Rd_ Michael J_ Domino,Vice-President ,��� �Gy P.O.Box 1179 James F. King Mc Southold,NY 11971 Dave Bergen Telephone(631)765-1892 Charles J.Sanders l �� Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DATE OF INSPECTION: L/ Ch. 275 Ch. 111 i INSPECTION SCHEDULE Pre-construction, hay bale line/silt boom/silt curtain 1St day of construction Y7 constructed Project complete, compliance inspection. a _ INSPECTED BY: COMMENTS: CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: MARTIN D.FINNEGAN r..o,..,,. . �; s SCOTT A.RUSSELL TOWN ATTORNEY , v. . » •,•.,..,. •..: Supervisor martin.finnegan@town.southold.ny,u�' STEPHEN F. KIELY �O f�® Town Hall Annex, 54375 Route 25 ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY P.O. Box 1179 stephen.kiely@town.southold.ny.us us Southold, New York 11971-0959 LORI M.HULSE p ® a� Telephone (631) 765-1939 ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY l�COUNTY,�e� Facsimile (631) 765-6639 lori.hulse@town.southold.ny.us OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 31, 2014 George D.Yatrakis, MD " '' - i auf l a i} .� t.. �I 18805 Soundview Avenue " P.O. Box 272 Southold, NY 11971 L! OCT 2 4 2014 �4 1 RE: SCTM No. 1000-351-1-14 Soulit„Id'iuxrt Dear Dr.Yatrakis, As per our agreement dated April 21,2014,Trustee Jim King inspected the above referenced property and found the restoration to be materially in compliance with Permit No.7712 as amended. Therefore, the performance bond submitted to the Town in connection with this project is enclosed as per our agreement and the terms of the permit. The one outstanding issue with respect to Permit No.7980(attached)is the absence of plantings behind the rock revetment. As per the terms of the permit,the slope area was to be re-planted with native vegetation or Cape American Beach Grass. This work remains incomplete. Please contact the Office of the Board of Trustees once the plantings have been done so that your Certificate of Compliance can be released. Regards, Lori M. Hulse Assistant Town Attorney i n e- l e S.0\4- Imo. c Enc: _f Cc: Members of the Board of Trustees ff1Sl cc+o' George D.Yatrakis, MD 18805 Soundview Avenue PO Box 272 Southold, NY 11971 October 24, 2014 Board of Town TrusteesV W•; ( i a' `� ,, Town of Southold �� ,^ � Town Hall Annex 5437 Main Road OCT 2 7 2014 P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 -- - ---- t _ South��d Tay.n Dear Mr. King: In accordance with the Bond issued in connection with the "Board Approved Permit& Plan" approved by the Board of Town Trustees as SCTM351-1-14, I am providing you notice that the restoration work has been completed by Creative Environmental Design in accordance with the plan previously submitted. Accordingly, I request that the Trustees comply with the terms of the Bond and return the$25,000, "performance bond" submitted to secure the restoration work under a wetland permit. Sincerely yours, LA George atrakis Cc: Ms. Lori Hulse, Mr.William Ferris George D.Yatrakis, MD 18805 Soundview Avenue PO Box 272 Southold, NY 11971 October 24, 2014 Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold Town Hall Annex 5437 Main Road P.0 Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. King: In accordance with the Bond issued in connection with the "Board Approved Permit& Plan" approved by the Board of Town Trustees as SCTM351-1-14, I am providing you notice that the restoration work has been completed by Creative Environmental Design in accordance with the plan previously submitted. Accordingly, I request that the Trustees comply with the terms of the Bond and return the$25,000, "performance bond" submitted to secure the restoration work under a wetland permit. Sincerely yours, George trakis Cc: Ms. Lori Hulse, Mr.William Ferris E (";1' ILEIVfE AR OCT 2 4 2014 Southold Town ' James F.King,President �o�OgUFFQ(,�c Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President OGy� P.O.Box 1179 Dave Bergen �+ Southold,NY 11971 John Bredemeyer Telephone(631)765-1892 Michael J.Domino Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK, TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND POSSIBLE REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. INSPECTION SCHEDULE Pre-construction, hay bale line 1St day of construction % constructed VProject complete, compliance inspection I BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK ,.s i PERMIT NO. 8197 DATE: MAY 15, 2013 ISSUED TO: GEORGE YATRAKIS i t j PROPERTY ADDRESS: 18805 SOUNDVIEW AVENUE, SOUTHOLD SCTM# 51-1-14 AUTHORIZATION Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the meeting held on May 15,2013,and in consideration of application fee in the sum of$250.00 paid by Creative Environmental Design and subject to the Terms and Conditions as stated in the Resolution,the Southold Town Board of Trustees authorizes and permits the following: Wetland Permit to re-vegetate any disturbed areas due to the construction of new rock revetment and access area; removal of existing grass from top of bluff to northern pool fence line,and re-vegetate with native plant species; construct a 4'wide access path to stairs consisting of bluestone flagging set on sand base;with the conditions this project is to be completed within 90 days from issuance of permit,if more time is needed an extension request may be submitted,and if not completed within specified timeframe, new violations will be issued; receipt of a$25,000.00 bond for project; plantings must have a survival rate of 90% for a two-year period; area is to remain a non-disturbance buffer with the exception of restoring any plants that may die during the two-year period; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by Creative Environmental Design,last dated May 15,2013,and stamped approved on May 15, 2013. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date. _ I I Bob Ghosio, Jr. o .�+ Dave Bergen— Nay CIO am„ Jpbn Bredeme er— Na ! oy + olg r _. .........-- TERMS AND CONDITIONS The Permittee George Yatrakis residing at 18805 Soundview Avenue, Southold,New York as part of the consideration for the issuance of the Permit does understand and prescribe to the following: 1. That the said Board of Trustees and the Town of Southold are released from any and all damages, or claims for damages, of suits arising directly or indirectly as a result of any operation performed pursuant to this permit, and the said Permittee will,at his or her own expense,defend any and all such suits initiated by third parties, and the said Permittee assumes full liability with respect thereto,to the complete exclusion of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold. 2. That this Permit is valid for a period of 24 months,which is considered to be the estimated time required to complete the work involved,but should circumstances warrant, request for an extension may be made to the Board at a later date. 3. That this Permit should be retained indefinitely,or as long as the said Permittee wishes to maintain the structure or project involved,to provide evidence to anyone concerned that authorization was originally obtained. 4. That the work involved will be subject to the inspection and approval of the Board or its agents,and non-compliance with the provisions of the originating application may be cause for revocation of this Permit by resolution of the said Board. 5. That there will be no unreasonable interference with navigation as a result of the work herein authorized. 6. That there shall be no interference with the right of the public to pass and repass along the beach between high and low water marks. 7. That if future operations of the Town of Southold require the removal and/or alterations in the location of the work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Board of Trustees, the work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to free navigation,the said Permittee will be required, upon due notice,to remove or alter this work project herein stated without expenses to the Town of Southold. 8. The Permittee is required to provide evidence that a copy of this Trustee permit has been recorded with the Suffolk County Clerk's Office as a notice covenant and deed restriction to the deed of the subject parcel. Such evidence shall be provided within ninety(90) calendar days of issuance of this permit. 9. That the said Board will be notified by the Permittee of the completion of the work authorized. 10. That the Permittee will obtain all other permits and consents that may be required supplemental to this permit,which may be subject to revoke upon failure to obtain same. 11. This permit does not convey to the permittee any right to trespass upon the lands or interfere with the riparian rights of others in order to perform the permitted work nor does it authorize the impairment of any rights,title,or interest in real or personal property held or vested in a person not a party to the permit. James F. King, President 911 so!ryo Town Hall Annex Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President h0 lQ 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Dave Bergen Southold,New York 11971-0959 John Bredemeyer G '� � �� Telephone(631) 765-1892 Michael J. Domino Ol'•C�UI��� Fax(631) 765-6641 i BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES May 15, 2013 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. David Cichanowicz Creative Environmental Design PO Box 160 Peconic, NY 11958 RE: GEORGE YATRAKIS 18805 SOUNDVIEW AVENUE, SOUTHOLD SCTM# 51-1-14 Dear Mr. Cichanowicz: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wednesday, May 15, 2013 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Creative Environmental Design on behalf of GEORGE YATRAKIS applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated October 24, 2012, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation that the application to re- vegetate any disturbed areas due to the construction of new rock revetment and access area and construct a 4' access path to stairs consisting of bluestone flagging set on sand base.be found Consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program policy standards, and, WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator recommended that the proposed application to remove existing grass from top of bluff to northern pool fence line be found Inconsistent with the LWRP, and, WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has furthered the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Policy Standards to the greatest extent possible through the imposition of the following Best Management Practice requirements: the establishment of a planting 2 restoration plan that includes the identity of plants to be used with the required survival rate of 90% for a two-year period; and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on May 15, 2013, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that for the mitigating factors and based upon the Best Management Practice requirement imposed above, the Board of Trustees deems the action to be Consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program pursuant to Chapter 268-5 of the Southold Town Code, and, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees APPROVES the application of GEORGE YATRAKIS to re-vegetate any disturbed areas due to the construction of new rock revetment and access area; removal of existing grass from top of bluff to northern pool fence line, and re-vegetate with native plant species; construct a 4' wide access path to stairs consisting of bluestone flagging set on sand base; with the conditions this project is to be completed within 90 days from issuance of permit, if more time is needed an extension request may be submitted, and if not completed within specified timeframe, new violations will be issued; receipt of a $25,000.00 bond for project; plantings must have a survival rate of 90% for a two-year period; area is to remain a non-disturbance buffer with the exception of restoring any plants that may die during the two-year period; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by Creative Environmental Design, last dated May 15, 2013, and stamped approved on May 15, 2013. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date the permit is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. 3 Inspections are required at a fee of$50.00 per inspection. (See attached schedule.) Fees: $50.00 Very truly yours, c ' Ja es F. King President, Board of Trustees JFK/amn Town of Southold Town of Southold A 2709 Suffolk County, NY A ' 2708 Suffolk County,NY The People of the State of New York vs. The People of the State of New York vs. LAST E(DEFENDANn FIRST NAME MIDDLE INITIAL a/ �r�b� LAST E(�DEQFE,�NiDA�NT) FIRST NAME MIDDLE INITIAL STRE� �7� ll�i _ APT.NO. DRE IF x /� STIR��� APT.NO. CITY STATE ZIP CITY STATE ZIP N t�k tiV /ppid N� `o,, N y co-?4 2013 LICENSE OR R ISTRATION NUMBER MAR - 5 / LICENSE OR REGISTRATION NUMBER STATE TYPE OF LICENSE DATE EXPIRES IX DATE OF BIRTH OPERATOR STATE TYPE OF UCENSE DATE EXPIRES IX DATE OF BIRTH OPERATOR 1� MONTH OWNS VEHICLE (�L ❑YES ONO M OWNS VEHICLE )i.lid;tt tliill y THE OPERATOR OR REGISTERED OWNER OF VEHICLE DESCRIBED BELOW r` ,���_j ✓• OYES ONO THE OPERATOR OR REGISTERED OWNER OF VEHICLE DESCRIBED BELOW PLATE NO. DATE EXPIRES PLATE NO. DATE EXPIRES STATE PLATE TYPE STATE PLATE TYPE ❑N.Y. ❑N.J. ❑N.V. ❑N.J. ❑ ❑PASS ❑COMM ❑ ❑N.Y. ❑N.J. ❑N.Y. ❑N.J. ❑ ❑PASS ❑COMM ❑ VEHICLE MAKE ❑ DODGE VEHICLE MAKE ❑ DODGE ❑ BUICK ❑ CHEV ❑ CADILLAC ❑ PONTIAC ❑ BUICK ❑ CHEV ❑ CADILLAC ❑ PONTIAC ❑ FORD ❑ OLDS ❑ PLYM ❑ FORD ❑ OLDS ❑ PLYM ❑ TOYOTA ❑ VOLHS ❑ ❑ TOYOTA ❑ VOLKS ❑ BODY ❑ 2 DR ❑ 4 DR ❑ BUS ❑ MCY ❑ S.W. BODY ❑ 2 DR ❑ 4 OR ❑ BUS ❑ MCY ❑ S.W. TYPE ❑ TRUCK ❑ TRAILER ❑ VAN ❑ TYPE ❑ TRUCK ❑ TRAILER ❑ VAN ❑ VIN NUMBER VIN NUMBER THE PERSON DESCRIBED ABOVE IS CHARGED AS FOLLOWS THE PERSON DESCRIBED ABOVE IS CHARGED AS FOLLOWS PLACE OF OCCURRENCE I p 1 Was— Ji JM�a1' d PLAC RRENCE I PC DATE OF AM TIME PM dTY,TOWN,VILLAGE.OR LET SUFFOLL COUNTY NY D OF E AM TIME PM dTY, OWN,NLLAGE,OR SUFFOLK NY IN TON OF SECTI SUBD. OF THE❑VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK IN VIOLATION OF SECTION SUED. OF THE❑VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 96THER(SPECIFY) - ❑O.S. ❑COM ❑BUS ❑HAZ BOTHER(SPECIFY) ❑O.S. ❑COM ❑BUS ❑HAZ f DEF VEM MAT Z�_� IC_ MA7 ❑ SPEEDING I 01HER E ❑ SPEEDING OTHER OFFENSE MPH IN A MPH ZONE m. t•/ MISDEMEANOR❑ MPH IN A MPH ZONE /'__��j EAN FACTUAL PART(NOT FOR TB) ^ FACTUAL PART(NOT FOR TVB) THE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANT DID ON THE TA BATE,TIME AND PLACE C6'.— THE ABOVE NAMED(DEFENDANT DID ON THE STATED DATE,TIME AND PLACE(6a V— t71. L L ^�-Y �_ ►?� lCl�,S� �y'GS i0K {� i'tf l�'. W��'�11�1�'�y.Y$'� rrrOrr��lpppppplllI 'Tb1.TVT'Cr.Y�?a_1AC.�u1.rt The Fomgokg'n based on(pe knowledge) witched ewom of .. w � yo�` The Foiagorg s bawd on(p•raorel krowkOg•) ett04—OT- IF aclletl s m r J dated PARKING SCHEDULED FINE S CONTACT COURT❑ PARKING SCHEDULED FINE$ CONTACT COURT❑ THE PERSON DESCRIBED ABOVE IS SUMMONED TO APPEAR AT THE PERSON DESCRIBED ABOVE IS SUMMONED TO APPEAR AT SOUTHOLD TOWN JUSTICE COURT,53095 ROUTE 25,SOUTHOLD,NY 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN JUSTICE COURT,50095 ROUTE 25,SOUTHOLD,NY 11971 ON �DATE OFAPPFAMNCE NOT FOR 1. ••.6 M _f// ;— ON AT FALSE STATEMENTS HEREIN ARE PUNISHABLE AS A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO SECTION 210.45 OF THE P.LN.Y.S. FALSE STATEMENTS HEREIN ARE PUNISHABLE AS A BASS A MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO SECTION 210.45 OF THE P.LNYS. COMPWNANT DATE p� COMPLAINANT DATE o3"'O �l 03—o Lf—/7 BADGE M E � BADGE N Lam- M MARTIN D.FINNEGAN • SCOTT A.RUSSELL TOWN ATTORNEY Supervisor inaitin.Finnegan @town.southold.ny. *0f so�Tyo JENNIFER ANDALORO �O l0 Town Hall Annex,54375 Route 25 ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY P.O.Box 1179 jennifer.andaloro @town.southold.ny.us Southold,New York 11971-0959 LORI M.RULSE %�l i� Telephone(631) 765-1939 ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY ycoulm' Facsimile(631) 765-6639 lori.hulse @town.southold.ny.us OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD D William T. Ferris October 2, 2013 Attorney for Defendant OCT - 4 2013 10050 Old Nichols Road,Ste.200 Islandia, NY 11749 5autho:d'-own T RE: 18805 Soundview Ave.,Southold Dear Mr. Ferris, Pursuant to Board of Trustees resolution(attached)of May 15,2013,the Board approved a restoration plan as submitted by your client,to be completed within 60 days,with survivability of the plantings to extend to two years. The resolution allowed for an extension of the time to complete the restoration upon request of the applicant. The final condition was receipt of a $25,000. performance band guaranteeing completion of the project as permitted. To date,the owner has failed to complete,or even begin the project. The Town has not received the bond or a request for extension beyond 60 days. Pursuant to the resolution noted above,the Board has recommended new violations of the Town Code be issued to the owner and will put this matter on the agenda at the November 13, 2013 meeting to revoke the permit for failure to comply with terms thereof. Regards, Lori M. Hulse Assistant Town Attorney Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Cc: Members of the Board of Trustees Southold Town Police Department, Bay Constables Board of Trustees 57 May 15, 2013 along Strohson is technically non jurisdictional MR. CHICHANOWICZ: Is there any other concerns I could maybe address? I did speak with Mrs. Muller yesterday. She called me at my office and I discussed the entire project with her, you know, it was like no surprises, exactly what it is. She seemed to be put at ease. TRUSTEE GHOSIO:We have seen this from time to time where there are a few projects like this done in town. They seem to work. I mean, Gagen's Landing has one that seems to work pretty well in that area. So, I think it's probably, as far as I'm concerned, a good plan.Any other comments from the Board? (No response). Any other comments from the audience? (No response). I'll make a motion to close the hearing. TRUSTEE BERGEN: Second. TRUSTEE KING:All in favor? (ALL AYES). TRUSTEE GHOSIO: I'll make a motion to approve the application as submitted. TRUSTEE BERGEN: Second. TRUSTEE KING: All in favor? (ALL AYES). TRUSTEE KING: Number 15, Creative Environmental Design on behalf of GEORGE YATRAKIS requests a Wetland Permit to re-vegetate any disturbed areas due to the construction.of new rock revetment and access area; removal of existing grass from top of bluff to northern pool fence line, and re-vegetate with native plant species; construct a 4'wide access path to stairs consisting of bluestone flagging set on sand base. Located: 18805 Soundview Avenue, Southold. This was found inconsistent and consistent, recommending the proposed action to remove existing grass from top of bluff to north of pool fence is inconsistent with policy standards. Although the existing grass is proposed to be removed and the area will be replanted, the native species to be planted have not been identified nor have survival requirements for the planted species been proposed. It is recommended that plant coverage of the buffer area is restored to minimum of 90%. The proposed action to re-vegetate any disturbed areas due to the construction of new rock revetment and access area and construct a four-foot wide access path to the stairs is consistent. So the inconsistent part of it is restoration of this area. I don't see anything in here from Conservation Advisory Council. There is nothing recent from Conservation Advisory Council, but they did make a recommendation in November. They supported the project with at least a 15-foot non-turf buffer landward of the top of the bluff. Doug Hardy inspected the property and found the bluff to be severely eroded and recommends the application be resubmitted after the bluff has been stabilized. That's from the Conservation Advisory Council back in November. Is there Board of Trustees 58 May 15, 2013 anyone here to speak on behalf of or against this application? MR. CHICHANOWICZ: Dave Chichanowicz, Creative Environmental Design, for Dr. Yatrakis. You recently received an amended landscape plan for re-vegetating the area between the pool fence and the top of the bluff. I know we have had discussions in the past as far as how this was going to be re-vegetated. I know it was suggested by one of the Board members to put in 26-inch caliper trees to kind of bring it back to the original state before the violation. My recommendation is to limit trees to just three(3)4"to 4 1/2" caliper shape trees as noted on the plan, allowing enough sunlight and growth for the undergrowth of the other plants on my plans. Putting in larger trees, I think, would be a detriment to the integrity of the bluff, putting too much pressure on the upper edge. Along with that, I did propose an additional berm that is approximately 15 feet seaward of the pool fence. Another way of helping control some additional erosion. All of the existing grass that is there will be removed and just wood chips installed around the vegetation. Does anybody on the Board have any questions for me? TRUSTEE KING: I see, I'm just looking at the new berm that is there. This was an area that was very heavily vegetated, that was completely wiped out. I guess there is a violation still pending on this. MS. HULSE: Yes, I discussed that with counsel today and his intention is to resolve that matter as well. The next court date is in June. TRUSTEE KING: What's the Board's pleasure? TRUSTEE BERGEN: I think it's important to note the history here. MR. CHICHANOWICZ: I think it might be in the Board's interest to listen to counsel representing Dr. Yatrakis. He's here right now, if you may. TRUSTEE BERGEN: Sure. He's welcome to come to the mic. MR. FERRIS: Thank you, very much, for moving this along. I appreciate that.At the Trustees meeting with you last Wednesday, Mr. Bergen, I'm very much aware of the history on this. I want to thank you for moving on this tonight, looking at it, and meeting with us last week. Let me assure you, too, that my client, Mr. Yatrakis, is also anxious to move on this. I can't speak to what happened in the past but I just know what we could do going forward, and working with Mr. Chichanowicz in terms of the plans, I think that he has developed a plan that is certainly environmentally sound and will restore the property, that section of property as best as possibly could be, under present circumstances. And I know that Dr. Yatrakis is prepared to move forward with the plans as proposed tonight by Mr. Chichanowicz. TRUSTEE BERGEN: Again, from an historical perspective, it was an empty lot with a very small, old, falling down shed, that maybe once was a dwelling a long time ago, that the applicant bought. The Board went out and reviewed this prior to any construction starting. The applicant knew there was going to be a very large area that was deciduous trees. Clearly he knew what he was • • Board of Trustees 59 May 15, 2013 getting. He knew that those trees had to remain. He elected to build a house. He then elected after this Board had met with him out in the field and told him specifically there would be a small area that would be cleared because of the removal of this structure that had previously been there, that the rest of this whole area of the property going to Long Island Sound was to be left in a naturalized state. It was so heavily vegetated, as the pictures showed, that--well, it was heavily vegetated. I'll leave it at that. The applicant then chose to wipe it out, and now has come back to us asking for forgiveness and I'll put three trees in and some shrubs. A lot of shrubs. I know, I understand, and I respect Mr. Chichanowicz's opinion as far as survivability of trees that are six inch in diameter, five inches in diameter, greater or lesser, because he's an expert in that area. And I know he's an expert in that area. So, from what I understand, four-inch diameters are the size that would survive out there. They require a lot of work to maintain survival. But the applicant chose to wipe this area out and defoliate it. If that requires a little extra work on his part to maintain, re-vegetation, so be it. For me,there is no way I can accept a plan with just three trees in it. Absolutely not. It will have to be, I don't know the exact number,just for myself, I don't know how the rest the Board feels, there has to be more trees of four-inch diameter in there. I want to see that property restored. It can't be restored to the condition it was in. Your client prevented that from happening when he elected to wipe it out. So now it needs to be restored to the best of everybody's ability here. And so I would like to see many more additional trees put in there and the vegetation, you know, increased, to what it was as originally intended by this Board. MR. FERRIS: I think that's why Dr. Yatrakis relied on Mr. Chichanowicz as someone who has the expertise in this area, both in terms of engineering and in terms of conservation of resources and the best ability for these plants and trees to survive. I understand very well that no matter how many trees Dr. Yatrakis has put there, and the shrubs, will require a fair amount of maintenance in making sure they survive. He understands that. Let me also say to you, Mr. Bergen, I was not party to the prior conversations, but I'll tell you from my own experience, in terms of dealing with the client, and I say this not to aggravate you any further than you already are, but to just let you know from my client in talking to him, for whatever reason, there was confusion on his part in terms of what he could or could not do. Now, you may not believe me on that, but I'll tell you I spent a fair amount of time going over this with him. I understand where the Trustees are and the jurisdiction that you have. He now fully understands what happened here and that is why, again, he has engaged Mr. Chichanowicz to continue to try to restore the buffer area, and it is a buffer, and it's on the map. I understand that well, on the plan Mr. Chichanowicz has. So having said all that, I understand where you Board of Trustees 60 May 15, 2013 are coming from. But he does want to move forward. That's why I'm here tonight as well. And I want to thank you for putting this on the calendar tonight in doing that. MR. CHICHANOWICZ: Mr. Bergen, again, I would like to challenge you on the requirement of how many trees, whereas you are trying to recreate what was there originally. And I understand that wholeheartedly, 100%. We talked on the side about this. The fact of the matter is that the native trees that were there before they were removed was not helpful to the integrity of that bluff. So you, as protectors of our lands, should be first and foremost encouraged to do the best that you could with improvement of areas closest to the bluffs and erosion and such. With the plans that I have submitted, that is taking that full-heartedly in mind. Putting in 20 trees, if we could put six-inch healthy, would not be a stronger bluff. It would not be stronger. Putting in 20 4"trees is not going to be as good. We need to get additional sunlight. Similar to you when you create catwalks and such, you want sunlight to create in areas where the undergrowth will allow to grow hardily. Same condition here, on a larger scale. So I kind of beg to differ with you on your opinions. I know what you are trying to come up with but as far as a horticultural point and protecting this environment, I think our plan here has a solid foundation for that. TRUSTEE GHOSIO: I have a question. Once this is re-vegetated, of course, it's still a non-disturbance buffer. MR. CHICHANOWICZ: Still non-disturbance. TRUSTEE GHOSIO: Once this is established, there is no mowing, no cutting, there is no trimming. I'm just kind of curious, what do you see this thing looking like in a couple years; two, three years down the road when there is nothing done to it at all? What do you think it will look like? MR. CHICHANOWICZ: Actually, the undergrowth should mature out at a culmination of probably anywhere from two to four foot in height, fully filled, on the underbrush. And then the selected trees that we are planning on putting in will have a high cascade. The nature of the honey locust is a high umbrella effect of shade with filtered sunlight to still allow the undergrowth to survive nicely. So you'll get a much nicer result from just leaving it alone after it's established and is allowed to grow full. TRUSTEE GHOSIO: I was very disappointed myself. I made that very clear in the proceedings that happened before this. MR. CHICHANOWICZ: I was not too happy, myself, to tell you the truth. TRUSTEE GHOSIO: I know.We all go back to the beginning of this. But, in an effort to move on, you know, and knowing that I trust what you are telling me, if we leave it, if it's left alone and it's non-disturbance and a couple of years this will grow in, the only suggestion I would make, knowing the history of, that we have with Dr. Yatrakis, is that the Board would establish a bond. We have it within our rights to be able to do that. So, Board of Trustees 61 May 15, 2013 that's the only suggestion I would have. Aside from that, I'll go with it. TRUSTEE DOMINO: I don't want to repeat word for word what Trustee Bergen said before but I can say I admire his eloquence. He stated it very well, and I fully endorse his position. There needs to be more trees in this plan. MR. CHICHANOWICZ: So what's the magic number?What's the breaking; do we put in five trees, ten trees? TRUSTEE BERGEN: I recommend that you, to quote the phrase, go back to the drawing board, redesign something with more trees, that you are comfortable with, and I'll understand if you are not comfortable doing that, but. TRUSTEE KING: I think he's comfortable with what he's proposed. MR. CHICHANOWICZ: I'm very comfortable with what I've proposed. TRUSTEE BERGEN: Well, I'm not. Again, I fully respect what you are saying. And you have a much greater knowledge base of this than I do. You really do. But I just can't go for a plan, knowing what that lot looked like, and that if they were mature trees, that lot had been heavily vegetated for years and years, the bluff was completely stabilized when we first went out there. There were no--there was erosion problems to the neighbor to the west, I guess it is, but I don't see any reason why, in my opinion, this can't be more heavily vegetated. To put three trees and a lot of shrubs out there doesn't cut it for me. But that's just me. MR. CHICHANOWICZ: Again, you know, I could go back to the drawing board and I could put in what you like to see to approve it, but again, it will go contradictory to what we are trying to accomplish on the long run. So I would say I would like to stand my ground as to this is what I feel is a good compromise. It's not putting back what you had. I know what it looked like, too. I was out there with you. I saw it plain as day. But again, as far as root structure, you know, in that whole area, what was there and what will be there, is completely different, completely different format. TRUSTEE KING: Is there anybody else on this application? MR. FERRIS: May I just add another thing, Mr. King? Mr. Bergen, I hear your anger, okay-- TRUSTEE BERGEN: It's not anger, sir. It's frustration. It's just frustration. MR. FERRIS: (Continuing) in dealing with my client on this issue. I just ask, again, I have had no input with the plans with Mr. Chichanowicz. I relied on his expertise and time out here in the area to know that certain things may not be restored exactly to what they were, but in terms of having trees and shrubs that is good for the soil and good for the bluff, for my limited perspective, sir, is what is really important, as opposed to just restoring to what it was before. And we have a plan now that actually is going to help the bluff in terms of erosion, and in terms of drainage. I again would encourage you to follow Mr. Chichanowicz's plan. ! • Board of Trustees 62 May 15, 2013 If I may also, Mr. Ghosio mentioned something about bond. Um, assuming this is approved, my client is prepared to move forward with this as quickly as possible. I have already spoken to Ms. Hulse regarding the issue of a bond. There are other things this Board can do if my client fails to comply with the requirements both in terms of what this Board is doing and in terms of the Board adherence. And again, I understand where Mr. Ghosio is coming from in terms of history,with all due respect, sir, I look at that as almost a punitive type measure. Because my client is going forward. I'm here for a particular purpose. You gentlemen have responded to that request. And we are ready to move forward on this.We don't need a bond to encumber that and slow it down. TRUSTEE BERGEN: I understand what you are saying, sir, but when you say if my client doesn't do what is asked here, there are certain measure this Board can take in the future. That horse is already out of the barn. Your client already did that. So that horse is out of the barn. Your client knew what we approved there and he knowingly wiped it out. So don't say to me if he does it again you guys can impose further punitive action. That doesn't work. It just doesn't work for me. So, you know, I have discussed this enough tonight.That's just, I'm sorry. MR. FERRIS. Any other questions from any of the gentlemen? (No response). MR. FERRIS: Thank you. TRUSTEE GHOSIO: I say we set a $25,000 bond and go with this plan and move this thing along. TRUSTEE KING: Dave, do you have a timeframe when this project can be done and completed? MR. CHICHANOWICZ: Approximately 60 days from the time the permit is received. TRUSTEE GHOSIO: If we take a bond, it will be in his best interest to do it as fast as possible. TRUSTEE KING: If there are no other comments, I'll make a motion to close this hearing. TRUSTEE GHOSIO: Second. TRUSTEE KING:All in favor? (ALL AYES). TRUSTEE KING: I would like to move this thing along. It's been a very troubling project right from the get-go. I know the Board's frustration because we met out there on more than one occasion and then saw what happened. I would make a motion to approve this restoration project. It's to be completed within 60 days of the permit being issued. You want a $25,000 bond on this? TRUSTEE GHOSIO: I think that-- TRUSTEE KING: Just to show we are serious. If the project can't be completed within 60 days, we need notification of how much longer it will take to finish it. And if it is not completed within 60 days or a modified time period at the request of the applicant, then I think you should just be re-violated. TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: Or forfeit the bond. I'm not up on the • 0► Board of Trustees 63 May 15, 2013 provisions of a bond. That's not my area. TRUSTEE GHOSIO: Believe me, once you make bond on something you are looking to get whatever the project is finished as fast as possible. TRUSTEE KING: I think that's our intent. We want to get this thing straightened out as best we can. It can never be put back the way it was. That's unfortunate. In my mind it's kind of sad, really. People come out here, they buy a piece of property. Oh, I love Southold so much. It's so beautiful, it's so natural. Then they come along and they create what they want. They wipe it out and re-create what they want. I don't understand it. I really don't. It's happened -- it happens time and time again with us. I have been on this Board 18 years. In the last ten years seems to be progressing. People are, I don't know, I just know how frustrated this Board gets sometimes when we see projects like this. TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: What about a multi-year inspection? TRUSTEE KING: We need, as was recommended, we need survivability for the plantings, too, of two years, so the stuff doesn't die off and doesn't get replaced.That would be part of this project. Two-year survivability of the plantings. And it's to remain a non-disturbance buffer, unless they have to go in and replant something that passed away. That's basically my motion. TRUSTEE GHOS1O: I'll second. TRUSTEE KING: All in favor? (No response). Do you want to do a roll call vote? TRUSTEE BERGEN: Is that motion clear enough for the record? TRUSTEE KING: I'll make motion to approve the restoration plan as submitted. It's to be a two-year survivability of all the plantings. We'll give him 60 days to get this job done from the issuance of the permit. If more time is necessary, we need to be notified to what extent they need for an extension of it. If it is not completed within that timeframe, there will be new violations issued. There is to be$25,000 bond issued on this project. And it's to remain non-disturbance buffer, unless they have to go in and restore any plants that perhaps died within the two-year period. That's my motion. TRUSTEE GHOSIO: We have to address the inconsistency. Re-establishing this -- TRUSTEE KING: We've established the planting plan. There is, the plants have been identified and we are stipulating there is a required survival rate of 90%for two years. And I think that addresses the inconsistency problem. That's my motion. TRUSTEE DOMINO: Can you emphasize this is a non-disturbance buffer in perpetuity? . TRUSTEE KING: Yes, this will be in covenants on the deed. TRUSTEE DOMINO: That if indigenous species sprout up, they can't be taken out. TRUSTEE KING: That's right. Do you want a roll call vote? TRUSTEE GHOSIO: I seconded. Board of Trustees 64 May 15, 2013 TRUSTEE KING: Trustee Domino? TRUSTEE DOMINO: Aye. TRUSTEE KING: Trustee Bredemeyer? TRUSTEE BREDEMEYER: Nay. TRUSTEE KING: Trustee Bergen? TRUSTEE BERGEN: Nay. TRUSTEE KING: I'll vote aye. Trustee Ghosio? TRUSTEE GHOSIO: I'll vote aye. TRUSTEE KING: Motion carries,three to two. (Trustee King, aye. Trustee Ghosio, aye.Trustee Domino, aye. Trustee Bergen, nay. Trustee Bredemeyer, nay). TRUSTEE BERGEN: Number 16, En-Consultants on behalf of ARTHUR SKELSKIE & NAN MOLOFSKY request a Wetland Permit to demolish upper story of existing 1.5-story dwelling and construct a new second floor and roof to create a finished 1 &2-story dwelling with a 10'x16' one-story addition in place of existing 6'x16' covered breezeway; a +/-2'x13' easterly addition with new crawl space below, a +/-7'x10' easterly porch with steps, a +/-8'x9.5'westerly porch with steps, and an outdoor shower on west side of house; maintain existing 10'x36' deck attached to west side of house and construct enclosed storage area on slab below; remove and replace roof and cupola over attached garage; expand existing masonry patio on south side of house; remove existing sanitary system and install new sanitary system more than 100 feet from wetlands; install drainage system of drywelis to collect roof runoff; repair existing concrete retaining wall along driveway; remove existing fish pond and brick patio; remove existing +/-3,100 sq.ft. Impervious asphalt driveway and install new pervious stone driveway; and establish an approximately 34,000 sq.ft. (approximately 45% of upland area)non-turf buffer. Located: 510 Bayberry Road, Cutchogue. This was reviewed under the LWRP and found to be consistent. The action's approved but it's recommended a non-turf buffer be specified. That was it for the LWRP.And the Conservation Advisory Council resolved to support the recommendation with sanitary system drainage plans to be noted on the site plan. The Board did go out and looked at this. Is there anybody here to speak on behalf of this application? MR. HERRMANN: Yes. Rob Herrmann on behalf of applicant from En-Consultants. The applicant Mr. Skelskie is here in the audience and the project architect Mark Schwartz is here as well, if you have any questions of any of the three of us. This project involves a number of renovations, most which are occurring within the footprint of the existing structures without further encroachment on the wetlands. And with very, very minimal change in lot coverage as defined under Southold Zoning Code. To mitigate the renovations there is an existing T MARTIN D.FINNEGAN SCOTT A.RUSSELL TOWN ATTORNEY Supervisor martin.Finnegan@ town.southold.ny.us O*rjf SOUryOI h O Town Hall Annex,54375 Route 25 JENNIFER ANDALORO P.O. Box ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY 1 jennifer.andaloro @ town.southold.ny.us Southold,New York 11 971-0959 1 LORI M.HULSE i0 Telephone(631)765-1939 Ol ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY Facsimile(631)765-6639 �C�U���� lori.hulseC town.southold.ny.us OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD William T.Ferris October 2, 2013 Attorney for Defendant 10050 Old Nichols Road,Ste. 200 Islandia, NY 11749 RE: 1880S Soundview Ave.,Southold LOCT 2013 - 2 Dear Mr.Ferris, �f�t ;.d�cwn Pursuant to Board of Trustees resolution (attached)of May 15,2013,the Board approved a restoration.plan as submitted by your client,to be completed within 60 days,with survivability of the plantings to extend to two years. The resolution allowed for an extension of the time to complete the restoration upon request of the applicant. The final condition was receipt of a $25,000. performance bond guaranteeing completion of the project as permitted. To date,the owner has failed to complete,or even begin the project. The Town has not received the bond or a request for extension beyond 60 days. Pursuant to the resolution noted above,the Board has recommended new violations of the Town Code be issued to the owner and will.put this matter on the agenda at the November 13, 2013 meeting to revoke the permit for failure to comply with terms thereof. Regards, Lori M. Hulse Assistant Town Attorney Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Cc: Members of the Board of Trustees Southold Town Police Department, Bay Constables James F. King, President �QF SOUly Town Hall Annex 0 Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President �� l0 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Dave Bergen Southold,New York 11971-0959 John Bredemeyer G • Telephone(631) 765-1892 Michael J. Domino QI�C � � Fax(631) 765-6641 �UNT`I, BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 7, 2013 Dave Cichanowicz Creative Environmental Design P.O. Box 160 Peconic, NY 11958 RE: GEORGE YATRAKIS 18805 SOUNDVIEW AVENUE, SOUTHOLD SCTM#: 51-1-14 Dear Mr. Chichanowicz: On Wednesday, December 12, 2012, the Board of Trustees formerly reviewed the application of the above referenced property and voted to Table the application pending the submission of revised site plans to include the following: the complete removal of the sod; planting of at least 20 trees not less than 8" in diameter; that the area be heavily re-vegetated using native species with a guarantee of a survival rate of not less than three (3) years and to be subsequently maintained; that a $50.000.00 Insurance Bond be posted on the property guaranteeing the survival of the re-vegetated Non-Disturbance area; Upon receipt of the amended site plan the matter will be placed on the next available agenda and the hearing re-opened. Sincerely, James F. King, Pr dent Board of Trustees Peter Young,Chairman H Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Lauren Standish,Secretary P.O.Box 1179 • Southold,NY 11971 Telephone(631)765-1892 1 Fax(631)765-6641 Conservation Advisory Council Town of Southold The meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council scheduled for Wed., November 7, 2012 at Down's Farm Preserve was cancelled due to damage to residential areas as well as power outages caused by Hurricane Sandy and a Nor'easter on the day of the meeting. Several of the Conservation Advisory Council members conducted their inspections and provided the following recommendations/comments: GEORGE YATRAKIS to re-vegetate any disturbed areas due to the construction of new rock revetment and access area; removal of existing grass from top of bluff to northern pool fence line, and re-vegetate with native plant species; construct a 4' wide access path to stairs consisting of bluestone flagging set on sand base. Located: 18805 Soundview Avenue, Southold. SCTM# 51-1-14 Audrey Horton inspected the property and Supports the project with at least a 15' non-turf buffer landward of the top of the bluff. Doug Hardy inspected the property and found the bluff to be severely eroded and recommends the application be resubmitted after the bluff is stabilized. J L NOV 1 3 2012 ' v f F941r lames F.King,President �p� Ck P.O.Box 1 179 Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President � y Southold.NY 11971 jr Dave Bergen Telephone(631 765-1892 John Bredemeyer Fax(631)765-6641 Michael.l.Domino 'F Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection/Worksession Report Date/Time: Creative Environmental Design on behalf of GEORGE YATRAKIS requests a Wetland Permit to re-vegetate any disturbed areas due to the construction of new rock revetment and access area; removal of existing grass from top of bluff to northern pool fence line, and re-vegetate with native plant species; construct a 4' wide access path to stairs consisting of bluestone flagging set on sand base. Located: 18805 Soundview Avenue, Southold. SCTM# 51-1-14 Type of area to be impacted: _Saltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland Sound Bay Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: _Chapt.275 Chapt. 111 other Type of Application: Wetland _Coastal Erosion _Amendment _Administrative_Emergency Pre-Submission Violation Info needed: 1 Modifications: Conditions: Present Were: J. King B. Ghosio D. Bergen, J. Bredemeyer Michael Domino D. Dzenkowski other Form filled out in the field by Mailed/Faxed to: Date: :t ` ra"i wn y Nu t y '^1.1, ► NIP * ai i�� rT».' it ! • >�, / �{ 1 .� • cal. � S ,..4- --. • V. 1 aeon cue Yati a k i s 18805 Soundview Ave., Southold ���Thla51-I-•1-t �` �.. s � . . 11,712 e RVZOW VWW IM 41111111. M,► X14 ,�#.„� ilk S�- �. - _ r>• � y > m c r 1 3 } d r .. lw - ,tea" V_1� fw r r Sl d — rf x r r r W • ,r. t a °yp�r., t .s r k 'yr.` ';.�4 " � .�"�'��'� �'�'-'TAY .�..., - :°.'. '� �• i x : �w „ •. � �xxx- '& .. � �� „yam , s a� t s a `°X= # _ :aa �. rya .. ::.� f ti... "�• ,xd� A° - w s r _ _ � r 3°A c x tx � m =Y ♦ ,�, }}}jjj f? a � n a v �14.72 I it lie M e � � 3 « ' y a Quf FO(,� James F.King,President ,(� �' P.O.Box 1179 Bob Ghosio,Jr,Vice-President 7 All ��� Southold,NY 11971 Dave Bergen - Telephone(631 765-1892 John Bredemeyer Fax(631)765-6641 tp Michael J. Domino Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection/Worksession Report Date/Time: Creative Environmental Design on behalf of GEORGE YATRAKIS requests a Wetland Permit to re-vegetate any disturbed areas due to the construction of new rock revetment and access area; removal of existing grass from top of bluff to northern pool fence line, and re-vegetate with native plant species; construct a 4' wide access path to stairs consisting of bluestone flagging set on sand base. Located: 18805 Soundview Avenue, Southold. SCTM# 51-1-14 Type of area to be impacted: � � _Saltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland VSound Bay Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: ,,6hapt.275 Chapt. 111 other Type of Application: "WA etland _Coastal Erosion _Amendment Administrative_Emergency Pre-Submission Violation Info needed: Modifications: Conditions: ] /t"5 )zDf ,? 4 7-y /2)02� 17 / Present Were: Z � Z. King . Ghosio �. Bergen, J. Bredemeyer Michael Domino D. Dzenkowski other Form filled out in the field by cl- �' Mailed/Faxed to: Date: f 0 rrrxx a r tMO..tiM ru.. ��� ,rvr.m — — r.merrr--•m-- w�xry rwmww - i _ gym:. ��� IF/t NmxOr,x' afnxxZ:.xmnY � "'. 1>® N „w1 � At oe SOUND �Iq aut.oe © e`P �e.m sEE sEC.No.,as ISLAND ,11 LONGic5rr�vtNw � N .�D 43 P.O.70 n m, x, ® mo to ,e H _. , 1 IC SCN.0.5 i � 1s'a ,• I� � of f% ta.s tie �aMc1 x �1? x�d�` st^ w a,a ,ey -� ,1Rm ,wq a w ,x d� ;�_ r•• ^^ an H y aECaic uNO TNUaT,iNC. O � � Q ° Ytx's tY' ,z+z tx„ � �` "U a�wetc«ersctarn -•� � ^ ar w - ._ , �1LD c� s .xis a ae w ,z to 5x0 C rroNNOrwnretn �. y�a ,,.ran B IIy w masarererwxra r lx 4� L A I - aa aiµq zxt t1a a m �p0 \��•0 ry �w� 1➢� k l.vjq 1,a 1a �I ,� ! 1 �3 MLOe00t�� y '� 1a zl 2an OSS0100e.t • ,Nilcl 1M � y.,6 WI,,X—�---LINE P tl 1.1Hq w lure ai i s I i I I 4 • °" `� - -" _ rx• --" NOTICE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © x�° , o an,nxaLa SECTION NO E —�— p,l _-u - "_--x-_-_ Real Property Tax Service Agency v N tr.lw ---.. a... —_� err --i-- awm--M-- CwnryC�WawrMY,NT„aH r s 51 ^ wu.m d•r mrt n m xrr� �� •mouMNn A[wrierrrmen50 0 raw. a arw tztxpl.tzu x�r —__� xxrr m �� • ttwz ra[ nxwu. --r—= rm�m--+-- rzxu rrwria xmurtwxnex rsruox orrre a a ae s A- rsesNUrtrtrrrwxamxe.�wcr. P M m mrecrq tea ,__. a6L PaOPERTYMAP ■ ■05/15/2013 09:23 63123492 8 BMMLAW PAGE 01/02 ■ i Ir BRACKEN MARGOLM BESUNDER LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUTE 200 1050 OLD WHOLs ROAD y ISLAN D.TA,NFw YORK 11749 (631)2348585 FAX(631)234-8702 1. PLEASE DELTWR.A As SOON AS,POSSIBLE 4, 1 To: Lori Plulse From: William T. Ferns, Esq. i Soutliold Town Attorney's Office Fax: (631) 765-6639 Date: May 15, 2013 1 'ti Re: People v. Yatralcis Pages: 2 Total.t.umber of pages includes this page. If you do not receive all pages,please call (631.)234-8585 Message: r'. Please see attached letter. Thank you. ail I yy f:+ 4; RECEIVED 9 MAY 15 2013 t<; to Town Attorney's Office /[LCASE TAKF NOTICE: This transmission is a privileged and confidential communication by an attorney to an intended recipient. Any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this document and are not the intended recipient,please notify us immediately by a telephone call to; (631)234-8585,collect if ncccssaty,for instructions to facilitate the return of this communication. Thank you. ti- BMMLAW PAGE 02/02 05!15!2013 09:23 63123492 8 )6MML V I�A(7t U2102 WWI AJf LUl.7 1G.J,.� rJJJ.I,�t! i. BRAT F.N MARGOLtN ESUNDFR LLp io-10 Old fainbols Road soled 200 Attorneys at Law lsla,idin NY 11.749 7rL 631 234 8365 i FAX 631 2)4 8702 ' www.bmblawl I,p.enm 7AWAMT,FM"TIT i Counsel �'j �atia.�l�ls�sl�:aaga x,y May 13,2013 d EIVE Jamea�', p'residelxt,Board of Traste s MAY 1 5 2013 Town of Southold 1 P.O. Box 1179 i 9outholdo NY 11971,0959 own 'i,` Board of lrnsteer� F.c: George Xs 1�1S � 18805 SoniJ. view Avern ie:,Southold Deu,?resident?ng and T tees; 13y 11j$sigxla'ttn bel m,Dr.Y'att0d$authorizes me to appear end reps! nt 1ai1n at the Tovm TrusWes meetig on ftW.*sdsy,May 15;2013 and at any subsequent eeftg c4Mn your j r w��[Ud wi . ,e II[ T authorize Willliam .Perris Jrl to appear and represent me iA,conttecfa n%ith 1ny. o erl at the Towt1 Txlsstc mQata i on Wedrwda May 15, properly Y g Y, Y 2013 and ex Rnl,sM.,uc>xt meeting, to ' �f�xakas L. his �1 ;r t s �'ti' OFFICE LOCATION: ��►�� SyOl MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY 11971 G Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 OW N% LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM _ T . To: Jim King, President t�i DEC 1 2 2012 Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: December 12, 2012 Re: Proposed Wetland Permit for GEORGE YATRAKIS SCTM# 1000-51-1-14 It is my understanding that the applicant has been issued a violation for clearing the non-disturbance buffer required by the Board under permit 7122 and that the area will be replanted. Creative Environmental Design on behalf of GEORGE YATRAKIS requests a Wetland Permit to re- vegetate any disturbed areas due to the construction of new rock revetment and access area; removal of existing grass from top of bluff to northern pool fence line, and re-vegetate with native plant species; construct a 4' wide access path to stairs consisting of bluestone flagging set on sand base. Located: 18805 Soundview Avenue, Southold SCTM# 51-1-14. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action to remove "existing grass from top of bluff to northern pool fence line", is INCONSISTENT with the Policy Standards and therefore is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. Although the existing grass is proposed to be removed and the area will be replanted, the native species to be planted have not been identified nor have survival requirements of the planted species been proposed. It is recommended that plant coverage of the buffer area is restored to a minimum of 90%. The proposed actions to re-vegetate any disturbed areas due to the construction of new rock revetment and access area and construct a 4' wide access path to stairs consisting of bluestone flagging set on sand base is CONSISTENT. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney James F.King, President O��Q� S�UryOl Town Hall Annex Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President 54375 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Dave Bergen Southold,New York 11971-0959 John Bredemeyer G Michael J. Domino Telephone(631)765-1892 Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only _Coastal Erosion Permit Application Wetland Permit Application Administrative Permit _Amendment/Transfer/Extension '0 Received Application: / `f /C' Received Fee:$ 01 so Completed Application 1 _Incomplete �:'. OCT 24 2012 _SEQRA Classification: Type I Type II Unlisted E --,- �c,-T- , _Coordination:(date sent) P n n .`,{jrnc;;.or LWRP Consistency Assessment Form to ) CAC Referral Sent: 10 1& of _kDate of Inspection: / _Receipt of CAC Repo t: Lead Agency Determination: Technical Review: Public Hearing Held: ( )),q I PA Resolution: Name of Applicant�� Mailing Address (r, Phone Number:04�) Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - Property Location: 111c>5 `c7[9C to ;LuJ Ave-, (provide LILCO Pole#, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: 0m-efi-ve �n � (If applicable) PO Box 160 Address: Peconic,NY 11958 Phone: 11 Bo d of Trustees Application • /GENERAL DATA Land Area(in square feet): 2 / 9 -"2 Area Zoning: Previous use of property: PV-5,Aae Intended use of property: Rl-t) �e4y-e Covenants and Restrictions on property? Yes ✓No If"Yes", please provide a copy. �, ) /� Will this project require a Building Permit as per Town Code? �"- Yes `- No If"Yes",be advised this application will be reviewed by the Building Dept. prior to a Board of Trustee review. Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals? Yes I✓ No If"Yes", please provide copy of decision. Will this project require any demolition as per Town Code or as determined by the Building Dept.? Yes i No Does the structure(s)on property have a valid Certificate of Occupancy?_ Yes No Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: g A e c Y �j r i Date y 3533 7 NVL60- No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? Vz Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary):&JOAC4;dri 0 A%`J}ut'v d` � Board of Trustees Application • WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: TL? Area of wetlands on lot: square feet Percent coverage of lot: % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? No Yes If yes,how much material will be excavated? cubic yards How much material will be filled? cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): IIII� , r VII Bo of Trustees Application . MI AUTHORIZATION (where the applicant is not the owner) residing at 1880S— S0UWD'/1e (print owner of property) (mailing address) Sovn �� ��1�. Iq-7 I do hereby authorize (Agent) "DAVID to apply for permit(s) from the Southold Board of Town Trustees on my behalf. X — (Owner's signature) i PROJECT ID NUMBER 617'20 SEAR APPENDIX C • STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART 1 -PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor) 1.APPLICANT/SPONSOR _( ! 2.PROJECT NAME !� 3.PROJECT LOCAMN: Municipality SwLitsmik County 4.PRECISE LOCATION: Street Addess and Road Intersections, Prominent landmarks etc -or provide map 5.IS PROPOSED ACTION: ❑ New ❑Expansion "Modification/alteration 6.DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: L�L� V� 7.AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially, acres , 7 Ultimately 17 acres 7 8.WIL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS? i DYes ❑ No If no,describe briefly: I i i P 9. AT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? (Choose as many as apply.) AT ❑Industrial ❑Commercial Agriculture ❑Park/Forest/Open Space ❑Other (describe) 10. DOES ACTI N INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (Fede I, State or Local) ElYes No If yes, list agency name and permit / approval: 11.DOES ANY PECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ❑Yes No If yes, list agency name and permit / approval: 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/ APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? ❑Yes ❑No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant / ame ' r v/ Z_ Date: Signature If the action I Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment I *A PART 11 - IMPACT ASSESSMENT To be completed by Lead Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.4? If yes,coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. Yes No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.6? If No,a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. 0 Yes [Z]No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING:(Answers may be handwritten,if legible) C1. Existing air quality,surface or groundwater quality or quantity,noise levels,existing traffic pattern,solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion,drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic,agricultural,archaeological,historic,or other natural or cultural resources;or community or neighborhood character?Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna,fish,shellfish or wildlife species,significant habitats,or threatened or endangered species?Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources?Explain briefly: C5. Growth,subsequent development,or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action?Explain briefly: C6. Longterm,short term,cumulative,or other effects not identified in C1-05? Explain briefly: .... C7. Other im ads(including changes in use of either quantity or tyge of energy? Explain briefl : D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREA CEA? If es,explain briefly: ElYes a No E. IS THERE,OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? If yes exp lain: El Yes 0✓ No PART 111-DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE(To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above,determine whether it is substantial,large,important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its(a)setting(i.e.urban or rural);(b)probability of occurring;(c)duration;(d)irreversibility;(e) geographic scope;and(f)magnitude. If necessary,add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. If question d of part ii was checked yes,the determination of significance must evaluate the potential impact of the proposed action on the environmental characteristics of the CEA. Check this box N you have Identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur.Then proceed directly to the FUL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. Check this box If you have determined,based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation,that the proposed actin WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide, on attachments as necessary,the reasons supporting thi determination. Board of Trustees p 10 411 7 Z O/ Z- 1 Name of Lead Agency / ,_ Date �/�/W f,f 1< /A[,. President p Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Qg:2�, tom' jifignature of Responsible Officer in Le gency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) I Town of Sou old Erosion, Sedimentation & Storm-Water Run-off ASSESSMENT FORM tS PROPERTY LOCATION: s.C.T.M.#: THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS MAY REQUIRE THE SUBMISSION OF A Ol 1C1t91) �j STORM-WATER,GRADING,DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN s r c ect on oc of CERTIFIED BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK. SCOPE OF WORK - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ITEM# / WORK ASSESSMENT Yes No a. What is the Total Area of the Project Parcels? (Include Total Area of all Parcels located within Generated this Project Retain All Inch Rainfall on the Scope of Work for Proposed Construction) Generated by a Two(2")Inch Rainfall on Site? (s.F./Acres) (This item will include all run-off created by site 1 b. What is the Total Area of Land Clearing clearing and/or construction activities as well as all — u and/or Ground Disturbance for the proposed y 1 Site Improvements and the permanent creation of construction activity? // impervious surfaces.) (S.F./Acres) 2 Does the Site Plan and/or Survey Show All Proposed PROVIDE BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Provide Additional Pages as Needed) Drainage Structures Indicating Size&Location?This Item shall include all Proposed Grade Changes and / Slopes Controlling Surface Water Flow. f�Q �r9 0 t 9 d �ft-i Y1� 3 Does the Site Plan and/or Survey describe the erosion +0 CVrVSArC:.tl- 44_) and sediment control practices that will be used to J:2 s + control site erosion and storm water discharges. This f �.�(yam n Cur1L` pss item must be maintained throughout the Entire Construction Period. 4 Will this Project Require any Land Filling,Grading or n �` Excavation where there is a change to the Natural Fi — �t!�t � �c�l Tt4" � � Existing Grade Involving more than 200 Cubic Yards LAe of Material within any Parcel? � l e�44 / �) 5 Will this Application Require Land Disturbing Activities Encompassing an Area in Excess of Five Thousand ❑ (5,000 S.F.)Square Feet of Ground Surface? 6 Is there a Natural Water Course Running through the Site? Is this Project within the Trustees jurisdiction General DEC SWPPP Requirements: or within One Hundred(100')feet of a Wetland or F] Submission of a SWPPP is required for all Construction activities involving soil Beach? disturbances of one(1)or more acres; including disturbances of less than one acre that 7 Will there be Site preparation on Existing Grade Slopes are part of a larger common plan that will ultimately disturb one or more acres of land; which Exceed Fifteen(15)feet of Vertical Rise to — including Construction activities involving soft disturbances of less than one(1)acre where One Hundred(100')of Horizontal Distance? the DEC has determined that a SPDES permit is required for storm water discharges. (SWPPP's Shall meet the Minimum Requirements of the SPDES General Permit 8 Will Driveways,Parking Areas or other Impervious F-1 for Storm Water Discharges from Construction activity-Permit No.GP-0-10-001.) Surfaces be Sloped to Direct Storm-Water Run-Off 1.The SWPPP shall be prepared prior to the submittal of the Not.The Not shall be into and/or in the direction of a Town right-of-way? submitted to the Department prior to the commencement of construction activity. 2.The SWPPP shall describe the erosion and sediment contra practices and where 9 Will this Project Require the Placement of Material, required,post-construction storm water management practices that will be used and/or Removal of Vegetation and/or the Construction of any constructed to reduce the pollutants in storm water discharges and to assure Item Within the Town Right-of-Way or Road Shoulder compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit.In addition,the SWPPP shall Area?(This Item will NOT include the Installation of Driveway Aprons.) identify potential sources of pollution which may reasonably be expected to affect the quality of storm water discharges. NOTE: If Any Answer to Questions One through Nine is Answered with a Check Mark i 3.AN SWPPPs that require the post-construction storm water management practice in a Box and the construction site disturbance is between 5,000 S.F.&1 Acre in area, component shall be prepared by a qualified Design Professional Licensed in New York a Storm-Water,Grading,Drainage&Erosion Control Plan is Required by the Town of that is knowledgeable in the principles and practices of Storm Water Management. Southold and Must be Submitted for Review Prior to Issuance of Any Building Permit. (NOTE: A Check Mark(4)and/or Answer for each Question is Required for a Complete Application) STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ...........SS That I,��y j�!l.J..4 ........:<<. .::.l.U.v...VLL.C... b in my sworn,deposes and says that he/she is the applicant for Permit, (Name o individual signing Document) Andthat he/she is the ................................ ...... ............ ........................................................................................................... (Owner,Contractor,Agent,Corporate Officer, I' Owner and/or representative of the Owner or Owners,and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application;that all statements contained in this application are true to the 4hisd.ge and belief;and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed herewith. j Sworn to before me this; ............��. q_._[!'1...................day of.. ... . .............................,2U�.1. n r _ NotaryPublic: ...... '`IP....�........... ..................................... .......................... Stale of Walu York FORM - 06/10 No.01BU6185050 Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Expires April 14,201 U NOTICE OF H -EARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, concerning this property. OWNER(S) OF RECORD. Geor-le SUBJECTOF PUBLIC HEARING: To re-vegetate any disturbed areas due to the construction of new rock revetment and access area; removal of existing grass from top of bluff to northern pool fence line, and re-vegetate with native plant species; construct a 4' wide access path to stairs consisting of bluestone flagging set on sand base. TIME & DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: r Wejm 11.)O✓ember I if/ ao/a - W% or " 6 If you have an interest in this project, you are invited to view the Town file(s) which are available for ins ection rior to the day of the hearing during normal business days between the ours o 8 a.m and ,4 p.m. BOARD OF TRUSTEES * TOWN OF SOUTHOLD * (631 ) 765- 1892 h808 6T96 7000 060E OTOZ' -_ CREATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN - - { rots sawres s 39160 Rout 2 New Post Office Box 160 1000 - 31,401 -- till i`*. it t! {1 1 — .�..,. `-. `Lry^ 3L4 t • i NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER I BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the matter of applicant: Gt:r c S SCTM# r YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to request a Permit from the Board of Trustees to: V U1 }c � 4- -6 2. That the property which is the subject of Environmental Review is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: 3. That the project which is subject to Environmental Review under Chapters 96,111 and/or 275((of the Town Code is open to public comment on: DATE: You may contact the Trustees Office at 765-1892 or in writing. The above-referenced proposal is under review of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold and does not reference any other agency that might have to review same proposal. PROPERTY OWNERS NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE #: AGENT:tea y-'-L 6&1. Ow MAILING ADDRESS: &,­,=mwentft1 PHONE #: po Box 160 e eonic,NY 11958 Enc: Copy of sketch or plan showing proposal for your convenience. Boa of Trustees Application County of Suffolk State of New York CZ- BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S)AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF,AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. Signature o wner SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS aq DAY OF 0t4j -+ ,20 Notary Public CONNIE D. BUNCH Notary Public,State of New York No.01 BU6185050 Qualffied in Suffolk County Commission Expires April 14,2"1�, APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM I i The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and emnlovees The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. z � YOUR NAME: Creative Environmental Deciltn C- L l -C7 (Last name,first n unless you are applying in the name of someone else gSg r on Wmpany.If so,indicate the.other person's or co lyJiS NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) i l Tax grievance Building ✓ Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If"Other,name the activity.) Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest"means a business, including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than�5%of the shares. YES NO If you answered_`YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. i Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee.Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. I The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant I. (when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted ay 0¢ Signature Print Name Lt` r Form TS 1 f III Town of Southold • LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated. as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town. 3: If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail, listing both supporting and non- supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office_ the planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# S - f - 1 1: OCT 2 4 2012 �e, Southold Tvin PROJECT NAME �'� s Southold of Trus!ees The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Board❑ Building Dept. ❑ Board of Trustees ) 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital ❑ construction,planning activity,agency regulation,land transaction) ❑ (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant, loan,subsidy) (c) Permit,approval, license,certification: t� Nature and extent of actiqp: K� Location of action: 61,UAd VkW AVZ-1 Site acreage: # 7 Present land user ; C� Present zoning classification: 4p� 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: C-,,--7 0 i o e---, (b) Mailing address: � Cy aq (c) Telephone number: Area Code( ) (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No If yes, which state or federal agency? C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location,and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criterifti es [J No ❑ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III-Poli 'es Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes 1:1 No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Sectio III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 throw h 21 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes 1:1 No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. ❑ ❑ EJ Yes , No Not Appli*e Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No[j;KNot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. S e LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes[] No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES • Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town w ers.See LWRP Section III-Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. F] Yes ❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for eval ation criteria. ❑ Yes 1:1 No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policie Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No Not Applicable PREPARED BY �GtN (i C—i C�✓alt�Y749 i LZ TITLE DATE ID 'C st- Creative Environmental Design PO Box 160 Peconic,NY 11958 SCDHS Ref. R10-07-0099 SURVEY OF PRORERT # AT SO UTHOLD TOWN OF SO UTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. ' N 1000-51-01-14 OCT 2 4 2012 SCALE. 1'=30' LONG ISLAND SOUND JULY 2 4, ZO 200 7 ( nNAL N86'18'10"E 99.96' MEAN HlCN WATER 'AE UNE BOTTOM OF BANK 1! z y COASTAL EROSION _ R 'W HAZARD UNE — — — — — ' 2 GAZEBO Top OF BANK �e o nom- sfvrb «- 1 >q - i 4� r up 3 O :FLOOD :ZONE r .. a -- ml ¢,gin z 8 �, r* r@ �- v `" Z � p P�/1NG STONE °y y PASO pook- APPROVED BY BOARD OF TRUSTEES � 14.6 31.7 13.7' D m n ❑ 2 STRY. FRAME 4 0 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD � ❑ & STUCCO HSE. DATE � ❑ q & GARAGE x— DATE (F.FLR. EL 57.4) U FE O) 15.2' O 15.4' 3.0' ^, N PAVING STONE j I t 21.2' `\ DRIVEWAY of I 0 15.4' '�r I ♦ `�' �l5 � V 'Ir�so�yoL � P�"7 ROAD ANGLE PANT : JUL - 8 2011 15 00' FF. LP. ' 0.5 W oMEI1 Sonth=Trustees ELm.e' N871 0'00"W 100.00' ��z3' Board mGe of IDAVt�ENT P • EL 5u9' -EL 521' AREA = 9,118 sq.ft. to tie line SOUND VIEW AVENUE ,. "UwN*h 4 ELEVA T70NS REFERENCED TO N.G. V.D. I am familiar with the STANDARDS FOR APPROVAL AND CONS7RUC770N OF SUBSURFACE SEWAGEr " DISPOSAL SYSTEMS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES ' and will abide by the conditions set forth therein and on the permit to construct. (VACANT) s � The location of wells and cesspools shown hereon are from field observations and or from data obtained from others. N. Y.S. LIC. N0. ANY AL7ERA770N OR ADD177ON TO THIS SURVEY IS A V10LA77ON ECONIC YORS, P.C. OF SEC77ON 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. EXCEPT AS PER !�EC770N 7209—SUBDIWSION 2. ALL CER77FlCA71ONS COASTAL EROSION HAZARD LINE (631) 765-5020 FAX (631) 765- HEREON ARE VALID -FOR THIS MAP AND COPIES THEREOF ONLY IF FROM COSTAL EROSION HAZARD MAP P.O. BOX -909 SAID MAP OR L'4/ES BEAR THE IMPRESSED SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR 1230 TRAVELER STREET �.•�L' CV^AIA,t,DC AvoX*Apc Ncroc-nw PHOTO # 55-578--83 cn,I uru n A/ v 11071 f 07-1 1 ► �w 1 ♦ I r � 1 r r r � � y///. • �` ' _� ♦il a ' `/ , �� ty 1 VAMA ME.Mill 0 ON 1 Oil ��=�■i= ' ' I !ill � ��■�i�=:jiii��j■i�i��■i�i �j■i= � ► �ii�i� 1•ii�i�l�i�i�l i�ii�liii! is j i j■i=!j■�iii j lIm iii Oil ■■��ioioi 1