The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About37384-Z ~ypFFpt Town of Southold Annex 1/23/2014 P.O. Box 1179 16 54375 Main Road $ W Southold, New York 11971 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No: 36726 Date: 1/23/2014 THIS CERTIFIES that the building WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS Location of Property: 23300 Route 25, Orient, SCTM 473889 Sec/Block/Lot: 18.-5-13.8 Subdivision: Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this otTiced dated 6/7/2012 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 37384 dated 7/23/2012 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is: existing telecommunications facility modified and equipment cabinet as applied for The certificate is issued to Orient Fire District (OWNER) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO. PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED o ' d Signa ure ¢?~k TOWN OF SOUTHOLD v BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE © SOUTHOLD,NY BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES WITH ONE SET OF APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) Permit 37384 Date: 7/23/2012 Permission is hereby granted to: Orient Fire District 23300 Route 25 Orient, NY 11957 To: modify an existing telecommunications facility & add an equipment cabinet as applied for At premises located at: 23300 Route 25, Orient SCTM # 473889 Sec/Block/Lot # 18.-5-13.8 Pursuant to application dated 6/7/2012 and approved by the Building Inspector. To expire on 1/22/2014. Fees: NEW COMMERCIAL, ALTERATION OR ADDITIONS $500.00 CO - COMMERCIAL $50.00 Total: $550.00 B ilding Inspector Form No. 6 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN HALL 765-1802 APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY This application must be filled in by typewriter or ink and submitted to the Building Department with the following: A. For new building or new use: 1. Final survey of property with accurate location of all buildings, property lines, streets, and unusual natural or topographic features. 2. Final Approval from Health Dept. of water supply and sewerage-disposal (S-9 form). 3. Approval of electrical installation from Board of Fire Underwriters. 4. Sworn statement from plumber certifying that the solder used in system contains less than 2/10 of 1% lead. 5. Commercial building, industrial building, multiple residences and similar buildings and installations, a certificate of Code Compliance from architect or engineer responsible for the building. 6. Submit Planning Board Approval of completed site plan requirements. B. For existing buildings (prior to April 9, 1957) non-conforming uses, or buildings and "pre-existing" land uses: 1. Accurate survey of property showing all property lines, streets, building and unusual natural or topographic features. 2. A properly completed application and consent to inspect signed by the applicant. If a Certificate of Occupancy is denied, the Building Inspector shall state the reasons therefor in writing to the applicant. C. Fees 1. Certificate of Occupancy - New dwelling $25.00, Additions to dwelling $25.00, Alterations to dwelling $25.00, Swimming pool $25.00, Accessory building $25.00, Additions to accessory building $25.00, Businesses $50.00. 2. Certificate of Occupancy on Pre-existing Building - $100.00 3. Copy of Certificate of Occupancy - $.25 4. Updated Certificate of Occupancy - $50.00 5. Temporary Certificate of Occupancy - Residential $15.00, Commercial $15.00 Date. July 25, 2012 New Construction: X Old or Pre-existing Building: (check one) Location of Property: 23300 Main Road Orient House No. Street Hamlet Owner or Owners of Property: Orient Fire District Suffolk County Tax Map No 1000, Section 18 Block 5 Lot 13.8 Subdivision Filed Map. Lot: New YoLimited Partner Permit No. Date of Permit. Applicant: Verizon Wireless Health Dept. Approval: Underwriters Approval: Planning Board Approval: Request for: Temporary Certificate Final Certificate: (check one) Fee Submitted: $ 50.00 Be, Ni`else`n, Huber & Coughlin, LLP Y: L~ QA~Want i ature John J. Coughlin Attorney for Applicant, New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless " 0 \i ALL-POINTS TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION January 18, 2014 Town of Southold Building Department Town Hall Annex Bldg. 54375 Route 25 Southold. NY 11971 Re: Verizon Wireless Cell Site "Orient Point' 23300 Route 25 Orient. NY District: 1000; Section: 18_ Block: 05; Lot: 13.8 Bldg Permit # 37384 Dear Building Official. I am New York State licensed Professional Engineer, retained by Verizon Wireless (VZW) in connection with the captioned matter. I have reviewed the completed antenna swap of the existing monopole interior-mounted antennas associated with VZW's collocation at the existing wireless telecommunications facility. It is my opinion that the completed installation substantially complies with the project plans and specifications, dated April 6, 2012. Please do not hesitate to contact us should you have any questions or comments. a,aaof NE Sincerely, qp., wY0 zaP oCt M Cy,~m 9F APT Engineering d° W w= an i ~ z ' C? z, ~p Tqr -le Scott.Chasse, P.E. Principal JAN 2 3 2914 ! I ALL-POINTS TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, P.C. 4Z 3 SADDITBIMOK DIM T RILL N(Ako K1-H. Ci 06419. 1'IML 860-663-1697 1 AX 860-063-0935 ?1'.0. BOX 504 1 I66RANM ]FUN ROAD (COFN' AY. NH 03518 I'I10NG6(G-4965853 1'AX (03-447-2L'4 FIELD 1NSPEMON REPORT DATE COMMENTS W ro J FOUNDATION (1ST) C FOUNDATION (2ND) z ~o ROUGH FRAMING & PLUMBING p7 INSULATION PER N. Y. STATE ENERGY CODE CY) r FINAL ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ttirG~ P eb . - ~ o $ 0 5 -.C z e TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST BUILDING DEPARTMENT Do you have or need the following, before applying? TOWN HALL Board of Health SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 4 sets of Building Plans TEL: (631) 765-1802 Planning Board approval FAX: (631) 765-9502 Survey SoutholdTown.NorthFork.net PERMIT NO. 37 3 `f Check Septic Form N.Y.S.D.B.C. Trustees Flood Permit Examined / L 20 ~L Stone-Water Assessment Form_ Contact: Attorney for Applicant:m.1 1 Cam` Approved -23 , 20 ~2- Mail to: Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP Disapproved a/c 36 N. New York Ave., Huntington, NY 11743 Phone: 631-425-4100 Expiratio 2 20- 1 Buildin nspector Nn, P TION FOR BUILDING PERMIT r..I1 Date ~yne (-C, >20D- INSTRUCTIONS a. Th liati#i p etely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 4 sets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and waterways. c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit shal I be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Certificate of Occupancy. E Every building permit shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date. If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property have been enacted in the interim, the Building Inspector may authorize, in writing, the extension of the permit for an addition six months. Thereafter, a new permit shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or Regulations, for the construction of buildings, additions, or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described. The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, building code, housing code, and regulations, and to admit authorized ins ec r necessary inspections. New York SMSA Limited Partnership dM/a Verizon Wireless (Signature of applicant or name, if a coMmajtim4 Limited Partnership 2012 4 Centerock Road, West Nyack, NY 10994 (Mailing address of applicant) " 11 State whether a lic architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder Applicant is Lessee Name of owner of premises Orient Fire District (As on the tax roll or latest deed) limited T of \ca~fi ~ka~ SSA ,~T ers1p a nio~i ePsszed officer By I TMr (Name and title wfWrq`3tttW r) Builders License No. Plumbers License No. N/A Electricians License No. Other Trade's License No. 1. Location of land on which proposed work will be done: 23300 Main Road Orient House Number Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 18 Block 5 Lot 13.8 Subdivisign Filed Map No. Lot J 2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy Fire House, Public Safety and Public utility wireless telecommunications facility b. Intended use and occupancy Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility 3. Nature of work (check which applicable): New Building Addition Alteration Repair Removal Demolition Other Work.Lessee/Applicant propose to modify/upgrade its exising public utility wireless telecommunications acMty by replacing stx existing antennas wt six new m antennas, reptacin ~ tw 12 G S units with two 2) new GPS units, and in allmg one additional equipment cabinet it elter 4. Esttmafed ~os~ ~ We (To be paid on filing this application) 5. If dwelling, number of dwelling units N/A Number.of dwelling units on each floor If garage, number of cars Fire House, Public Safety and Public utility wireless 6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use. telecommunications facility 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories *Existing 90' monopole Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Rear t Depth Height Number of Stories * No Change 8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories /189,816 sq. ft. 9. Size of lot: Front Rear Depth 10. Date of Purchase Nov. 14, 1985 Name of Former Owner Barbara Dwight Schriever 11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated Residential R-80 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? YES_ NO X 13. Will lot be re-graded? YES- NO X Will excess fill be removed from premises? YES NO X 23300 Main Road 14. Names of Owner of premises Orient Fire District Address Orient, NY Phone No. Name of ArchitecPilliam F. Collins, AIA Archictects, Address. 2 Technolo Dr. Phone No 631-689-8450 Addres~ e a -Phone No. Name of Contractor 15 a. Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES NO x * IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES & D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. b. Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? * YES_ NO x * IF YES, D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16. Provide survey, to scale, with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 17. If elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below, must provide topographical data on survey. 18. Are there any covenants and restrictions with respect to this property? * YES X NO * IF YES, PROVIDE A COPY. STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF R-kAL) try- ( Stfle - being duly sworn, deposes and says that (s)he is the applicant (Name of individual signing co tract) above named, ar ti• ,n ,i ,t , 1 , ; ri (S)He is the Lessee / Applicant (Contractor, Agent, Corporate Officer, etc.) of said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application, that al I statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief, and that the work will be performed in the tnanner set forth in the application filed therewith. Sworn to before me this dday of GfC 20L New York ~SMSSA~Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless rN/G Ji 7v'4-f- 'So By. FiCC 41 Notary blic Signature of Applicant t~11~ Michael R. Bonhomme Notary Public, State of New York ~SLbtr1' G QI~W(r/?lytyr R17~71 No. 01 B06144229 rint Name / Title above Qualified in Orange County Commission Expires 04/24/20 FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY SITE PLAN USE DETERMINATION Initial Determination Dater-/~/ 1 D_~ Sent:_&.f L / ~r ~ z n LtiJ ~ re •e~5 Ytil-~ Project Name: ~rleKto ~}S{r'~ Project Address: Q 3 ,3 o-Q Nl Q;,, Rc( fh t Suffolk County Tax Map No.:1000-__&_-_- ~3 $ Zoning District: A" Request:- a.~ V` a a dl AL EIS 41 - L/ f (Note: Copy of Building Permit Application and supporting documentation as to proposed use or uses should be submitted.) pp Initial Determination as to whether use is permitted: t S r.--ti 4z8&y Initial Determination as to whether site plan is required: Signature of Building dnspector Planning Department (P.D.) Referral: P.D. Date Received: / A Date of Comment 2 i JUN ti 3 ~ C ments: 01 Yu S M, rs4e --16A - - Signature of Planning Q ® E . o~ Final Determination JUL 2 0 2012 Date: ! 7 10 / /Z_ BLDG. DEPT. Decision: ~ TOWN OF SOUTHOID Rinnnhim of Rn a In.-nP. r RE, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 36 NORTH NEw YoEE AVENUE HUNTINGTON, NEW YORK 11743 TELEPHONE: (631) 425-4100 FACSIMILE: (631) 425-4104 OF C."NSEL WILLIAM J. NIELS'EN June 6, 2012 13v Hand Mr. Michael Verity Building Department Town of Southold Annex Building 54375 Route 25 Southold. NY 11971 RF.. New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless (°Verizon") Proposal to modify existing telecommunications facility at Premises: Orient Fire District 23300 Main Road, Orient, New York SC-1-m#: 1000 - 18 - 5 - 13.8 Dear Mr. Verity: We are the attorneys for Verizon in connection with its proposal to upgrade its existing facility at the subject premises. The modification proposed is part of Verizon's "LTE" (Long "term Evolution) project which will allow Verizon to provide better, faster and more reliable service in the Town. The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, codified at 47 United States Code § 1455, a copy of which is enclosed, provides that "a State or local government may not deny, and shall approve, any eligible facilities request for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station." ']'his proposal is an "eligible facilities request' pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §1455(x)(2) as it proposes only to replace and collocate certain transmission equipment Specifically, Verizon proposes to replace six (6) existing antennas inside the existing monopole with six (6) replacement antennas at the same height as presently existing, replace two (2) GPS units on the existing equipment shelter with two (2) new GPS units, and install additional equipment inside its existing equipment shelter. As such, we respectfully submit that the proposed nwdil ication will not "substantially change the physical dimensions" of the existing tower or base station. Moreover, the Telecommunications Act of 1996, codified at 47 United States Code § 332, as interpreted by the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") in its Declaratory Ruling 09-99 and Order On Reconsideration 10-144, requires that applications such as Verizon's be processed within 90 days. We enclose the following in support of the proposed eligible facilities request: I. Town of Southold Building Permit Application form detailing the eligible facilities request; 2. Owner's Authorization Affidavit; 3. Building Permit Application fee: Check of Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin LLP (Check No. 1339) in the amount of $500.00; New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless Proposal to modify existing facility at Orient Fire District .tune 6, 2012 Page 2 of 2 4. Two (2) counterparts of Antenna Site FCC RE Compliance Assessment and Report prepared by Pinnacle Telecom Group and dated March 27, 2012, demonstrating the project's compliance with the FCC's Maximum Permissible Exposure regulations; 5. Two (2) counterparts of Structural Analysis Report with design drawings, prepared by Global Tower Services, LLC and dated May 18, 2012, documenting the facility's structural compliance with local, state and federal codes; 6. Copy of Verizon's FCC Licenses; 7. Copy of Deed; 8. Copies of the following Lease Documents: a. Assignment and Assumption of Tenant Leases by and among Affordable Housing Associates Inc. d/b/a Beacon Wireless Management and GTP Towers I, LLC, dated January 31, 2008; b. Second Amendment to Land and Tower Lease Agreement between Affordable Housing Associates, Inc. d/b/a Beacon Wireless Management and New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, dated December 10, 2006; c. First Amendment to Land and Tower Lease Agreement between Affordable Housing Associates, Inc. d/b/a Beacon Wireless Management and New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, dated February 3, 2006; d. Land and Tower Lease Agreement between Affordable Housing Associates, Inc. d/b/a Beacon Wireless Management and New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, dated March 15, 2005, including copy of Communications Site Lease Agreement between Affordable Housing Associates, Inc. d/b/a Beacon Wireless Management and The Orient Fire District, dated October 15. 2002. 9. Copy of Verizon's Certificate of Occupancy No. Z.-33750, dated June I, 2009 and related Building Permit No. 34618-Z, dated April 17,2009; 10. Copy of Verizon's Planning Board Site Plan Approval, dated June 13, 2006; 11. Copy of Verizon's Zoning Board of Appeals Approval, dated May 18, 2006; 12. Copy of property survey prepared by PJM Land Surveying, PLLC, dated December 27, 2006; and 13. Four (4) sets of Construction Drawings with Site Plans and Elevations, prepared by ATP Engineering, dated April 6, 2012. We respectfully request that the instant proposal be processed in accordance with the above and that the appropriate Permit be issued at this time. We respectfully request that our office be contacted when the Permit is ready to be picked up. We can be reached at (631) 425-4100. Very truly yours, RE, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP By: C ighl' JC:mk Enclosures cc w/o encls.: Ms. Heather Lanza, Planning Director RE, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 36 NORTH NEW Yonx AVENUE y//~~ HUNTINGTON, NEW YoRR 11743 1"CC TELEPHONE: (631) 425-4100 G~ FACSIMILE: (631) 425-4104 or G~vxsxL WILLIAM J. NIELSEN July 25, 2012 By Hand Mr. Michael Verity Building Department Town of Southold Annex Building 54375 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 RE: New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon") Proposal to modify existing telecommunications facility at Premises: Orient Fire District 23300 Main Road, Orient, New York SCTM#: 1000 - 18 - 5 -13.8 Dear Mr. Verity: On behalf of Verizon, and pursuant to your office's request, we enclose, herewith, the following documents: 1. Application for Certificate of Occupancy; and 2. Our firm's check number 1380 in the amount of $50.00, which amount represents the required Certificate of Occupancy fee. We respectfully request that our office be notified once the Building Permit is issued so that we may pick up same from the Town. Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain Very truly yours, RE, NIELSEN,, HUUBBER & COUGHLIN, LLP By: X - T khli J. (todghlin JJC:mk Enclosures RE, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 36 NORTH NEw YORE AVENUE HUNTINGTON, NEw YORE: 11743 TELEPHONE: (631) 425-4100 FACSIMILE: (631) 425-4104 OF COUNSEL WILLIAM J. NIELSEN January 22, 2014 VIA UPS Delivery Mr. Michael Verity SAN 2 3 2014 Building Department Town of Southold Annex Building 54375 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 RE: New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon") Building Permit No.: 37384 Premises: Orient Fire District 23300 Main Road, Orient, New York SCTM#: 1000 - 18 - 5 - 13.8 Dear Mr. Verity: Our office represents Verizon in connection with the captioned matter. As previously discussed with your office, our firm is working with Verizon to close out the subject building permit issued on July 23, 2012 (copy enclosed herewith). Enclosed please find two (2) original counterparts of Certification Letter of Scott M. Chasse, P.E., of All-Points Technology Corporation, P.C., dated January 18, 2014. Should you have any questions with regard to the foregoing, please contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, RE, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP By: ou ,Odin JJC:mk Encls. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK : STATE OF NEW YORK ----------X In the Matter of the Application of New York SMSA Limited AUTHORIZATION Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless OF OWNER At the premises: Orient Fire District 23300 Main Road, Orient, New York District 1000 Section 18.00, Block 05.00, Lot 013.008 --------X STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) SS.: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) Ae-(N Qz QJ90EDC being duly sworn, deposes and says: Q,Nn,R, An ac - 4r 9-1c I am the oc Co ~ss.oNeas of the Orient Fire District, owner in fee of the premises known as Section 18, Block 5, Lot 13.8 (the "Premises" hereafter), and do hereby authorize New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ('Verizon Wireless' hereafter), and its representatives to bring such applications for municipal approvals as may be necessary for the upgrade/modification of its public utility wireless telecommunications facility. As such, I will fully cooperate with Verizon Wireless and its agents in obtaining any required Approvals. By: V ' Sworn to bef e me this d, of ~o E 2012 NOTARY PUBLIC EDWARD JOHN BOYD 5th Notary Public State of New York 02B00376625 Suffolk County Commission Expires April 30¦ 2GIS 11252F8255i DRCLARATION ON cOYF:NAN'r5 ANU Rrs,rRTCTIONS 'NITS UF:CLAUNr1ON made Chim 15th uay of April, 1991 by 1)~ MUM' V114k UIS'1'RICI' with otfieeM locat(Mi ut 233UO Main Head, Y()llll~ clr(ont., Now York, 11W,7 (horl,lnaftor rorvrrod to am Cho Starr, 0l('i.AHAN•r), "M tho uwnor of prumisow duNCribod in Nchudulu TUM "A" omnxnd hl, raw (hurulhu(lur retorted to am t.hu PREMISES) IItt,uCK doniron to re"tricl. Cho umu and enjoyment. of maid PHhMISES V,. -50 ;old ham fur such purpomo doterminud Lo impomo on v4ld PRI-MIUS +0'1' t•ovunanLM and rool.rict.ione dad doom huroby doc'.lart+ that, Mold ll. ttdlt PItAMtSI:S Mh,t1l bl, hold and Mim11 tx+ convoyed Mob}ocL to Chu 111 following covonantm and rumtrictiunml ~.?A life 1, WIIRRKAS, UEXTARAN'r ham made appltenttun Lo Lilo Sur- i~/•t+) rulk counLy Uoportment of Iloait.h Sorvioom (horoina•Lor rufurrod r it) ax tlt+' LIVAIAf1'Mh:NT) fur ,t purm)t to ConaCruct 4nd/or approval of planet for A minglo family rosi.dence, it Mubdivlsion or dovel- opetont. or othot %.unmtruction projocl. ++n t)lt+ I'MISMI5F:Si and 2. Wlil like, Lhr. PItkMISl:B art) u) bt+ morvod by an indtvid- ual on-milo priVato wo111 and Will-34M;, till, loNt wrllw Mamplod fur tho PREMISES in- dIctated it groundwater supply Chat had contaminatinn in Uxcvws or Chl, minimum drinkinq walot' ml,andord taut{/or quldnllnom nr tho Slate of Now Yurh and t'ontollwd nxcomm of IN- followingf Iron ,o+d NiLrotol nut t rompteto .link or Inaly"1M t't•nulLM iH Atlnchod rlrroto a" Schodule C, and noch chomical pdramulur which excoudm U(rw of t.ht• accoptablo lovol tm indiratlxi with in astariakl and WMhI*, S, Lht• County of Suffolk Uopartmont of lW41th sorvicum ham agrood to lsmuo a pormlt only it thoru be a record \~~f covenant that the nucoMSUry waLor condilloninq uquiptnont bo in- wt.al,lod :)u AS to muut t.hu quality Mtundarcim for drinking watort it iN UNCLARVI) and COVls'NM'rl•:1) by rwwi,AI(ANTS, lhair hnirm or muc- i ,v IaNMUrm and aasignm rurovur, that no rusidonco upon tho abovu drmcribud proprrty will W uccupiud prior to the installation of tho noaommory water conditioning equipment so that tho water. whvii vondit.lonod, moot" the said minimum quality mtandardm for U252K256 drlnkinq wtitov of the SLAW of Now York and ovidunco of name iH furniwhud to Cho 9ufrolk County Uoparl.mont. of Iroallh Sor- vicoN fur lhl,lr wrll.t:nn nppruva.l, 3, I'hl UhCI.AI<AN'I', 1lN nuccummorN Inld/ttl' ommig11H Khali mvL forth Lhueu covonarltul agruumuntN end doclurntirnlN In any and :Ill 14-aNON cu uccupantm, ConalltH mid/or lopimoom of the obovo doNcHbi,d ptopc.l•ty surd shall, by Cltvlr t.ornul, Nub,jucc HmnV 1'.II I,Ilo coW91alti-H dnd r•oHtr•I CL luau Cutlt al nvd horn Ill . F'.u LLrv of the PVC1,AkAN'f, Itm Nuccommorw and/or nmrignN to Yo condition Oil, likakum Nhall nut invalidroo their aut-io.ir, Nub- tLw,Itlat w tho covenantm and ruNLrirLlonN, A, All or till, covvivint.H rend roH1 ric•t ionH vontallted lv~ru- ln Nhall by cunHtruod to bu in addition to and not In dcgrogo- tlon or limitation upon any provlwiona or Iocul, wtato And fudoral lawn, ordlnanctm. and/or rogulaticmm in offuct at. Lhu LInN, ,.f vnitcul.inst or 011m agroolnonl, or It. t.ho time tlnc'h lawH, ordlncul,'oN, Ala)/or t'oglrltlt IonN luny Lhortut(LUr IN, rcrv1HCK1, a- mundod of prulnttlgatad, •rhia dooulnl,nl iN mado Hub,jk1c•1 Lo rho prmfidlunH of all lowN ruquirod by law tit' by tltulr provlHlonN to iar lncorporilLod hori-kll .md they area cit1o11wKl Lo bcr 1ntsrrporat.vd hot•vin and made a pork, hvroof, ItN Lhouqh fully Not fort.h. A. •1•ho afurvimmtA onud Nomirictjvu Covonaut.H Nhall bit on- rorcl,,lblo by t.hc* cotrr,ty of %urrolk, stotn or Now York, by in- juln+tlvo ruliof ul• by any other romody 111 oqulL.y or .U law, The falluro or Hdid agoncliccH or Lilo Cou11Ly or SUffolK~to unfol•co the Ham., Nhall not bit doomed to affect tho validity of this rovenant.. nor to llnpoNV any liability nl,uLauc.vur upon thu County of Suffolk or ant offict,l' or umployee thoroof, 7. ThoNe covenants and roatrictiona Khali run with the land and Nhal1 be hindinq upon the, I)EMARAN'I', its muecUYHorH and aK- Nlgnw, and upon all purnorm or ontitiow t•laiming under them, and moy bo l.urmJnatad, rovekud or amunded only with thu written Con- uont of the DEPARTMKN,r. U. 'rho c111ClnVatlonH Nut forth In tho WIIFRl;AS c1auwnH con- 1f252K257 Lalned heroin "hall be duomud and eunmtruod to be promimom, eovonantm raid remteictions an if fully rupautud and net forth horaln, 1r my rlucLLun, mubmocLitrn, parngraph, ulnume, phraua or provlrriun or thomv covonanLO and ruutr•.Lct.ionm rlhall, by a court of r:ompot.l•nl jurlmdlatlun, W ndjudgod illugnl, untnw- fttl, invalid, or hoid tin be, uncanmtltulional, the rlnmo Moll nnl. ,.Ifroct Lho validlly of Hulse rnvottattrm All a whole, ill' .011), othor part nr provininn heroof o0tor than fhu purl. mo adjudged to bo ltlogal, unlawful, tnvnlid or uncon,ttllutlunol. to. Local I,aw R12-1980 - 'I'll(, DIiCLAIrAN'I' roprrlmotll" and w.lr'r•Inl4 Ihdl ho ll,w not elfrorcd or glvr•t, nay gral.ult.y lu ally orrwko 1, vtnployoe, or egollL of Suffolk CounLy, New York State, or of illy political party, with the purpoau or intunt of mocur- Ina favorablo Lroatmont with ruupOel: to the porformonco of an agroomont, and that much pormun ham road nod im familiar with the provimlonm of Local Lnw p72-1900, OMENT FIRLL'UcISTRICT I•:.Llxrrt 1:, ucu, C au. rman' by ; Iloard of Firo commiumionure TrATI': ol•' NEW PORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK S5, I on thlN l,t.hday or April, 1991 bof,wo mu purmun.+lly apl,-...ud I?LUI;R'P E. LUCK, to mo luwwn and known to Ino Lo be Cho mamo individ- ual domcribud in and who uxucutud the nbovo inutrumunt and hu duly ,,cknoyda,dpc•d to me that ho oxncutud LINO 111UM). 'Nuearylpubllc ,•rtllf~b 21252M SCIR-3)MV "All MCLARAN'rt UNIENT FINE OlsntxcCr ALI, that cortalo pipit, plo(',r (q• pat'('r•l (,f fond, lying, Hit. unto, nit ho Ino it OrImit, 'l'awn of Suutllald, roomy of Suffolk Mid Stab cur M-o York, buundud and domcrilod at: fol.lowmt n1to1NN7NO at. Iho Intormoct.lon of tho wutiWerly ling of Main Road with tho oantorly lino or 'rtvWr [toad and running along nald Hbuthvrly lino of Main Pond, North 80 dogroum 31 minutum 30 NrwolldH I;aw t., 220,0 foot. Lo a monumoot. and ImW14 nsyw or formerly of Pvrroirai T1pSNCI: a1rm0 mitt[ ur Yurrolr,t Nuuth 'J dagroom 2n minuton JO mocntldm I•:+rmt., 109,70 ruotl 7'llENCI' North 87 dogruce 47 minutum JO mocundw Fart alunq maid landm of 1'rrroirn and lnt.or niong Lief ur 0lorlo raid nlnncl land of W-miknw,lki, 124,!')1 mot. La a miiimi-W. and l,rnd or Wlltiam'rarry, ,I1'.1 I'tlt:Nttli alunq Hold laid of 'furry, South 21 dvgrovu 20 minutom 00 tusc'ottdH 15aHt, 2118.04 foot) 'r11F:Nc% alon<l nthor land of Schro,Ncr, 50uth 117 dogroum OJ min. utow 50 mortondN Womt, 570.113 foot, to thv rnHtol'ly mldu of 'r.,lx,r Naad1 THENCE aluncl m,ftd lino of 'l'abor Road two courwcrmt ( t) Nort.1i 0 drgroo .111 nditow OU moc on(Im Wont, 342,05 foot) (2) Nart.h 4 dogruom 3g minutow 00 mocondn WOHt, 116.75 root to lho polnt ar placo of BkIIINNIN0, PimtriCL 1000, Soctlon 018,00, Mock 05,OUj Lot 013,008 112UN25g SCIMOULI: I'D" DECLARAN'l'i Uirm, rim.. ws,ri 1CP District. 10001 SOCL1GIl U111,0Dp Mock 09,000 Lot 013,000 S.i;u provikNOs IN noL mol'I.q.44od, 1125SdP6260 SC'HIiUULt: "C" OR LAItANTt 011INNT VIIttl UtTIVIM' :;uffolk County Uapart.monL or Mupl.Lh Servieuw Water Analysis dated Uorembor 11 1990 appendod hereto and made a part hereof. 11owUlt.14 in OXCVAH of 110% of minimum " mdards arty am followt 14umiAlL NYS CI, •"IILraty 10,7 10.0 mg/1 •Sulfata 167 250. mg/l • 1 run 0.119 0. J mg/l I 11252N261 SWrvtZll COlIMY11 a3raamelrt Or 32Y13n 483MCBO MATt21 ANUTSIS KAM/tl O5111MM 11"IRM OWWAAVW M7 - now hhiiding ADOaag1 Main and Tabor Maeda, Orient ghwL3 OAT31 ,11,11/AO 6,&,lL uva IWL Btiy3L NXQ 1C1, total colilorm 4212 42.2/100 m) alpha XIC <0,2 epscitlo cond. SDO - umhos/am bate-3HC <0.2 Vol 611 gaama-39C , 40.2 - nlsre34 1 1017 10,0 09/1 delta-1110C 40.2 - from Ammonia . 0.14 - mg/1 lln4mae (sun 6HC) - 4, ppb ohlorlde )4, 250, mg/I haptaohlor 40,2 - sulfate 167, 250. mg/l heptachl' spnmlds <0,2 Avon . oleo o,1 09116 aldrin <0.2 manganese',... 40.05 0.2 mq/1• dieldrln 40.2 copper <O.IO 1.0 mg/1 404 003 <0,2 - sodium 1910 - 0911? 414 too <0,2 $ine 0.4 5.0 mg/t 4,4 DOT <0.2 cadmium <2. 10, ppb andrin <0,2 0.2 ppb lead <1• 50, ppb andtln eldshyde <012 aidlaarb 41 7 ppb nhlordene <1. earboturan <1 111 ppb alsohlor 40.2 2. ppb naamyl <1 SO ppb methomychlor ..<0.2 110, catbaryl <1 50 ppb endosultan 1411 <0,2 met hra,yl <1 50 ppb mathlocerb 41 50- ppb baygon <I 50 ppb MSAa - detergents <0,1 mg/1 aq/1 a milligrams pot liter iron and manganese combined should not SK0004 0.5 m9/1, Moderately restrieted sodium diet should not emceed 210 mg/ I. Severely restiotad sodium diet should not emceed 20 m9/1. A3tulk Reedit vinyl chloride 40.5 121 benseno 40,5 methylene chloride <0.5 toluene <O,S I.I dLohLava%thena 40,3 chlorobensene <O.S t can* t,2 dichloroethsne 40.5 a!hylbansane 40.11 ohlorolornn <0,5 (100) 0-mylene 40.5 1,2 dichloroethamm <O.S m-hylsne 40.5 11111 tright* roethen* 46.5 p-Mylens 40,5 carbon tetrachloride 40,5 total mylene - 1 brand 2 ohloroethona <O,S o-ahlot*toluene 40.5 1,2 dlchloropeopane 40,5 m-chlorotoluane 40,5 trtahlotosthone 0.3 p-ohlorotoluene 40,5 ohlorodibeomemathane 40,5 (100) total chlorotoluene - 1,2 d1b9o111041thane ..1.., 40,5 10,031 1,1,5 trimsthylbamana 40,5 2 bra" 1 ohloraptopans 40.5 1,2,4 trlmethylbahsens 40.5 hromotorm <0,5 11001 m,p-dLohloe~~snsens .....,,1. <015 tatraonloroethene 40.5 o-dlchlarohensano 40.5 cis dichlnroethens <O,S p-diethylbenvene 40,11 boon 112 <O.5 1,2,4,5 tettamethylbensene 4015 dlbramomethane <0.5 1,2,4 trichlorobsnasne ..1... 40,6 1.1 dtahloroethene 40.5 1,2,1 trlnhlorebenune <0.5 bromodlohloraasthane 40.5 11001 ethenylbensens lstyrenal . 40.> 2,1 dtohloteptopsne :0.5 1 mothylethylbertsena (amens) <0,5 Zia dl0hicropropene <0.5 a-pro ylbenssne 40.5 crane dlohloroptopeM 40.5 term-butpplbensene <0,5 1,1,2 trichiorsethane <O.S sea-butylbennne 40,5 1,1,1,2 tatrachlo'sthanq 40,4 lsopropyltoluens (p-aymens) , <O.S e-tetrachiotoothans <0•9 n•butyyllbbeamsns <O,S 1,2,7 trlahloropropane . <O.3 hr Kaohlotobutadiana .,,...1., 40,5 2,2 dlohloropropane <O.S 1,1 didhloroyyeapens 40.5 "0731 4 symhnl means -lase than" 2 chlorcethylvlnylethas <0.5 indicating na detection Maalmm Contaminant Levels IM 1,16) tar volatile orOmnle arid hy0frne4olbon compounds are S pasts per billion (ppb) each. Limits established for individual oompounde are noted in parenthesesll. -Tr v Yr t rt' 09CLARATION OP (IMINANTS AND MTRICTION9 F;.. By ORIRNT FIRI DISTRICT @ILUD RY. •,t' a: T5w EDWARD JOHN BOYO V0 R80. ;-;0 54653 MAIN MVADo BOIL 1469 O 40SI i RALD, NY 11971 " i (516) 765-3555 ~ECQRQEd 1 t " United States Code United States Code J TITLE 47 --TELEGRAPHS. TELEPHONES. AND RADIOTELEGRAPHS CHAPTER 13 - PUBLI SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM AUCTIONS J J 47 U.S.C. § 1455. Wireless facilities deployment (a) Facility modifications (1) In general - Notwithstanding section 704 of the telecommunications Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-104) or any other prevision of law, o Irate or Local government may not deny, and shall approve, any eligible facilities request for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station. (2) Eligible facilities request - For purposes of this subsection, the term "eligible facilities request" means any request for modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that involves - (A) collocation of new transmission equipment; (B) removal of transmission equipment; or (C) replacement of transmission equipment. (3) Applicability of environmental laws - Nothing in paragraph (1) shall be construed to relieve the Commission from the requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act [16 U.S.C. 470 at seq.] or the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 142 U.S.C. 4321 at seq.). (b) Federal easements and rights-of-way (1) Grant - If an executive agency, a State, a political subdivision or agency of a State, or a person, firm, or organization applies for the grant of an easement or eight-of-way to, in, over, or on a building or other property owned by the Federal Government for the right to install, construct, and maintain wireless service antenna structures and equipmenr and backhaul transmission equipment, the executive agency having control of the building or other property may grant to the applicant, or. behalf of the Federal Government, an easement or right-of-way co perform such installation, construction, and maintenance. (2) Application - The Administrator of General Services shall develop a common form for applications for easements and rights-of- way under paragraph (1) for all executive agencies that shall be used by applicants with respect to the buildings or other property of each such agency. (3) Fee (A) In general - Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Administrator of General Services shall establish a fee for the grant of an easement or right-of-way pursuant to paragraph (1) that is based on direct cost recovery. (B) Exceptions - The Administrator of General Services may establish exceptions to the fee amount required under subparagraph (A)- (i) in consideration of the public benefit provided by a grant of an easement or right-of-way; and (ii) in the interest of expanding wireless and broadband coverage. (4) Use of fees collected - Any fee amounts collected by an executive agency pursuant to paragraph (3) may be made available, as provided in appropriations Acts, to such agency to cover the costs of granting the easement or right-of-way. (c) Master contracts for wireless facility sitings (1) In general - Notwithstanding section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 or any other provision of law, and not later than 60 days after February 22, 2012, the Administrator of General Services shall - (A) develop 1 or more master contracts that shall govern the placement of wireless service antenna structures on buildings and other property owned by the Federal Government; and (B) in developing the master contract or contracts, standardize the treatment of the placement of wireless service antenna structures on building rooftops or facades, the placement of wireless service antenna equipment on rooftops or inside buildings, the technology used in connection with wireless service antenna structures or equipment placed on Federal buildings and other property, and any other key issues the Administrator of General Services considers appropriate. (2) Applicability - The master contract or contracts developed by the Administrator of General Services under paragraph (1) shall apply to all publicly accessible buildings and other property owned by the Federal Government, unless the Administrator of General Services decides that issues with respect to the siting of a wireless service antenna structure on a specific building or other property warrant nonstandard rreauuciit of such building or other property. (3) Application - The Administrator of General Services shall develop a common form or set of forms for wireless service antenna structure siting applications under this subsection for all executive agencies that shall be used by applicants with respect to the buildings and other property of each such agency. (d) Executive agency defined - In this section, the term "executive agency" has the meaning given such term in section 102 of title 40. ( Pub.L. 112-96, title VI, Sec. 6409, Feb. 22, 2012, 126 Star. 232. 1 REFERENCES IN TEXT Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, referred to in subsets. (a)(1) and (c)(1), is section 704 of Pub.L. 104-104, which amended section 332 of this title and enacted a provision set out as a note under section 332 of this title. The National Historic Preservation Act, referred to in subset (a)(3), is Pub.L. 89-665, Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 915, which is classified generally to subchapter II (Sec. 470 et seq.) of chapter IA of Title 16, Conservation. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 470(a) of this title and Tables. The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, referred to in subset. (a)(3), is Pub.L. 91-190, Jan. 1, 1970, 83 Star. 852, which is classified generally to chapter 55 (Sec. 43_21 at seg.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4321 of Title 42 and Tables. Copyright © 2012 CCH Incorporated or its affiliates 162 Federal Communications Commission oW Wireless Telecommunications Bureau o.a RADIO STATION AUTHORIZATION LICENSEE: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP ATTN: REGULATORY CELLCO PARTNERSHIP I l20 SANCTUARY PKWY, #150 GASA5REG ALPHARETTA, GA 30009-7630 Call Sign File Number WQJQ696 0003864907 Radio Service WY - 700 MHz Lower Band (Blocks A, B, FCC Registration Number (FRN): 0003290673 E) Grant Date Effective Date Expiration Date Print Date 11-26-2008 06-I1-2009 06-13-2019 F 06-11-2009 Market Number Channel Block Sub-Market Designator A 0 BEA010 T i Market Name New York-No. New Jer.-Long Isl 1st Build-Out Date 2nd Build-Out Date 3rd Build-Out Date 4th Build-Out Date 06-13-2013 06-13-2019 Waivers/Conditions: If the tacili ties authorized herein are used to provide broadcast operations, whether exclusively or in combination with other services, the licensee must seek renewal of the license either within eight years from the commencement of the broadcast serviceor within the term of the license had the broadcast service not been provided, whichever period is shorter in length. See 47 CFR §27.13(6). Conditions: Pursuant to §309(h) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §309(h), this license is subject to the following conditions: This license shall not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station nor any right in the use of the frequencies designated in the license beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein. Neither the license nor the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the Communications iAct of 1934, as amended. See 47 U.S.C. § 310(d). This license is subject in terms to the right of use or control conferred by §706 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See 47 U.S.C. §606. I This license may not authorize operation throughout the entire geographic area or spectrum identified on the hardcopy version. To view the specific geographic area and spectrum authorized by this license, refer to the Spectrum and Market Area information under the Market Tab of the license record in the Universal Licensing System (ULS). To view the license record, go to the ULS homepage at http://wireless.fcc.-ov/tils/index.htm?job=home and select "License Search". Follow the instructions on how to search for license information. FCC 601-MB Page I of 1 April 2009 155 a~pMMUry~~ Federal Communications Commission W` $ Wireless Telecommunications Bureau o ct*' s RADIO STATION AUTHORIZATION LICENSEE: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP ATTN:REGULATORY CELLCO PARTNERSHIP 1120 SANCTUARY PKWY, #150 GASA5REG ALPHARETTA, GA 30009-7630 Call Sign File Number WQJQ689 0003865021 AN~ Radio Service WU - 700 MHz Upper Band (Block FCC Registration Number (FRN): 0003290673 C) Grant Date Effective Date Expiration Date Print Date 11-26-2008 06-11-2009 06-13-2019 06-11-2009 Market Number Channel Block Sub-Market Designator REA001 C 0 Markel Name Northeast 1sl Build-Out Dale 2nd Build•Oul Date 3rd Build-Out Date 4th Build-Out Date 06-13-2013 06-13-2019 Waivers/Conditions: If the facilities authorized herein are used to provide broadcast operations, whether exclusively or in combination with other services, the licensee must seek renewal of the license either within eight years from the commencement of the broadcast serviccor within the tern of the license had the broadcast service not been provided, whichever period is shorter in length. See 47 CFR §27.13(b). hits :uahurization is conditioned upon compliance with section 27.16 of the Commission's rules Conditions: Pursuant to §309(h) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §309(h), this license is subject to the following conditions: This license shall not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station nor any right in the use of the frequencies designated in the license beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein. Neither the license nor the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See 47 U.S.C. § 310(d). This license is subject in terns to the right of use or control conferred by §706 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See 47 U.S.C. §606. This license may not authorize operation throughout the entire geographic area or spectrum identified on the hardeopy version. To view (tie specific geographic area and spectrum authorized by this license, refer to the Spectrum and Market Area information under the Market Tab of the license record in the Universal Licensing System (ULS). To view the license record, go to the ULS homepage at http://wireless.fec.gov/uls/index.htm?job=home and select "License Search". Follow the instructions on how to search for license information. FCC 601-NIB Page l of l April 2009 121 OOMMyh,~ Federal Communications Commission w Wireless Telecommunications Bureau c ` RADIO STATION AUTHORIZATION LICENSEE: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP ATTN:REGULATORY CELLCO PARTNERSHIP 1 120 SANCTUARY PKWY, #150 GASA5REG .ALPHARETTA, GA 30 Call Sign File Number N N . WQBT539 0003864879 Radio Service CW - PCS Broadband FCC Registration Number (FRN): 0003290673 Grant Date Effective Date Expiration Date Print Date 02-2&2007 06-11-2009 01-03-2017 06-11-2009 Market Number Channel Block Sub-Market Designator BTA321 C 4 Market Name New York, NY lst Build-Out Date 2nd Build-Out Date 3rd Build-Out Date 4th Build-Out Date 12-07-2003 Waivers/Conditions: This authorization is subject to the condition that, in the event that systems using the same frequencies as granted herein ire authorized in an adjacent foreign territory (Canada/United States), future coordination of any base station transmitters within72 km (45 miles) of the United States/Canada border shall be required to eliminate any harmful interference to operations in the adjacent foreign territory and to ensure continuance of equal access to the frequencies by both countries. This authorization is conditioned upon the full and timely payment of all monies due pursuant to Sections 1.2110 and 24.711 of the Commission's Rules and the terms of the Commission's installment plan as set forth in the Note and Security Agreement executed by the licensee. Failure to comply with this condition will result in the automatic cancellation of this authorization. Conditions: Pursuant to §309(h) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §309(h), this license is subject to the following conditions: This license shall not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station nor any right in the use of the frequencies designated in the license beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein. Neither the license nor the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferrer) in violation of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See 47 U.S.C. § 310(d). This license is subject in terms to the right of use or control conferred by §706 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See 47 U.S.C. §606. 'this license may not authorize operation throughout the entire geographic area or spectrum identified on the hardcopy version. To view the specific geographic area and spectrum authorized by this license, refer to the Spectrum and Market Area information under the Market Tab of the license record in the Universal Licensing System (ULS). To view the license record, go to the ULS homepage at http://wireless.fcc.gov/uts/index.htin?job=home and select "License Search". Follow the instructions on how to search for license information. FCC 601.61B Page I of 2 April 2009 n Federal Communications Commission i b Wireless Telecommunications Bureau o ; E"*s RADIO STATION AUTHORIZATION LICENSEE: VERIZON WIRELESS TELECOM INC. ATTN: REGULATORY VERIZON WIRELESS TELECOM INC. SCANNED 1120 SANCTUARY PKWY #150 - GASA5REG ALPI IARETTA, GA 30004 Call Sign File Number KNLF644 0003298939 Radio Service CW - PCS Broadband FCC Registration Number (FRN): 0005798061 j Grant Date Effective Date Expiration Date Print Date 0248-2007 01-23-2008 01-03-2017 01-24-2008 Market Number Channel Block Sub-Market Designator BTA321 C 3 i Market Name i New York, NY 1st Build-Out Date 2nd Build-Out Dn[c 3rd Build-Out Date 4th Build-Out Date 12-07-2003 01-03- Waivers/Conditions: This authorization is subject to the condition that, in the event that systems using the same frequencies as granted herein are authorized in an adjacent foreign territory (Canada/United States), future coordination of any base station transmitters within72 km (45 miles) of the United States/Canada border shall be required to eliminate any harrnful interference to operations in the adjacent foreign territory and to ensure continuance of equal access to the frequencies by both countries. Conditions: Pursuant to §309(h) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C, §309(h), this license is subject to the following conditions: This license shall not vest in the licensee any right to operate the station nor any right in the use of the frequencies designated in the license beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein. Neither the license nor the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See 47 U.S.C. § 310(d). This license is subject in terms to the right of use or control conferred by §706 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. See 47 U.S.C. §606. To view the geographic areas associated with the license, go to the Universal Licensing System (ULS) homepage at lhttp://wirciess.fcc.gov/uls and select "License Search". Follow the instructions on how to search for license information. FCC 601-MB Page I of 1 August 2007 226.00' _ ~ N e0°31'30" r ' I ~ I I _ I 1 I 1 I I , rwf ~vr rwx wr O z 1 b I° \ FBI z I m ~ 1 . I ` N 87-4790" 6 ,I I J.. ~I ~ ~ I~i1TIfITB ~ r 1 T o/% pg / 1 _ TAVT S _ t 'I 370.83' 1 fly>I~ - - I B I - - - ~ - - 883°03'S0"w' Yw* wr I PIM LAND Sux=INO, PLLC - m YYM n wwBnwaroe,wvemre . - ~ warrlwrncce, Mr l l,ff m. mown v.lcr R-ry am fn.nlwvf Q PRO PERTY 9TIY ORIENT FINA1. SURVEY LOO m M »M Yf ml ORffiVT PD. 4 Y PIOM.T N0.:]W6.M _ DMWH:IM Q@p!®BY: MI ,CALB'1'~,f pA1E:ILSLOI sup myrsnru~raru tGTPStructural Analysis Report 90 ft. Stealth Monopole Global Tower Services 23300 Main Road, Orient Point, NY 11957 750 Park of Commerce Boulevard Suite 300 Suffolk County Boca Raton, Fl. 33487-3612 (NY-5015, Orient Point) P: 605.422.1548 9 F. 605.422.1550 Verizon Wireless Verizon Site Name: Orient Point Verizon Site Number: 157730 Uri PINI l t 1 4 i Prepared by: Global Tower Services, LLC - - --Michael T. De Boer, P.E. Director of Engineering May 18, 2012 Global Tower Services, LLC- May 18, 2012 Orient Point NY-5015 Table of Contents Introduction ...............................................................3 Description of Structure ................................................3 Design Parameter .........................................................3 Antenna Loading Information .........................................4 Analysis Results ......................................................4-5 Analysis Summary and Conclusions .................................5 Standard Conditions ......................................................6 Disclaimer of Warranties ...............................................7 Appendix A - Monopole Profile .............................Attached Appendix B - Calculations ....................................Attached Appendix C - Collocation Application .....................Attached Global Tower Services, LLC May 18, 2012 Orient Point NY-5015 INTRODUCTION We have completed the structural analysis for the existing 90 ft. stealth monopole located in Suffolk County (23300 Main Road, Orient Point), AK. The objective of the analysis is to determine if the existing Stealth Monopole design is in conformance / compliance with the current codes and standards for the proposed equipment installation. TSTower written by TowerSoft was utilized in performing the analysis. This program is a commercially available software program which was used to create a non-linear three- dimensional beam model and calculate member stresses for various loading conditions. DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE The existing structure is a 90 ft. Stealth Monopole. The original monopole manufacturer is Fred A. Nudd Corporation, Ontario, NY. The existing monopole consists of one (1) tapered monopole section and 45' of 12.75" pipe to support the stealth cylinders. Original monopole drawings provided by Nudd Corporation were used to model the monopole steel (Nudd Job No. 105-12113-1, May 17, 2005). The monopole shaft is manufactured from 65 ksi steel , the base plate is 50 ksi steel and the anchor bolts are A36 steel. The monopole, for the purpose of analysis, is considered to be in good condition with no defects. DESIGN PARAMETERS - Standard: ANSI/TIA-222-G-2005 - Local Building Code: New York State Building Code - Basic Wind Speed: 120 mph (3-sec gust) - Serviceability Wind Speed: 60 mph (3-sec gust) - Basic Wind Speed with lee: 50 mph (3-sec gust) - Design Ice Thickness: 0.75 (inch) - Allowable Stress Increase: N/A - Structure Class 11 - Exposure Category C - Topographic Category 1 Global Tower Services, LLC May 18, 2012 Orient Point NY-5015 ANTENNA LOADING INFORMATION Existin¢ and Reserved Loadin¢ Information 2W 4 ft. Omni 1 92 7/8" 1 Fire Dept. 12'x 18' Fla 1 84 NA Panel Antennas / Full Shielded 3 83 7/8" 12 ATT Panel Antennas / Full Shielded 3 73 7/8" 12 Sprint Panel Antennas / Fully Shielded 3 67.5 7/8" 6 Verizon To be removed and replaced) Panel Antennas / Fully Shielded 3 62.5 7/8" 6 Verizon To be removed and replaced) (4) Omni Antennas / Side Arms 4 45.5 %2" 4 Fire De t. Proposed Loading Information X7CAP-480i /Fully Shielded 3 67.5 (Existing) Verizon X7C-480 / Full Shielded 3 62.5 (Existing) Verizon Note: Final configuration for Verizon to include: Six (6) antennas and twelve (12) 7/8" lines. Lines are shielded inside the shaft and all antennas are concealed inside the stealth cylinders. ANALYSIS RESULTS Structure The existing 90 ft. stealth monopole is structurally capable of supporting the proposed equipment. (See table below) NNIUMENNNOM Monopole Shaft 94 Pass -Monopole Base Plate 50 Pass Anchor Bolts 93 Pass (105 percent is considered acceptable.) Global Tower Services, LLC May 18, 2012 Orient Point NY-5015 ANALYSIS RESULTS continued Foundation The existing foundation has also been evaluated. The existing foundation was found to be acceptable. (See table below) Overturning Moment 897.92 Ft-Kips 901 Ft-Kips 99 Pass Shear 16.63 Kips 28.9 Kips 57 Pass Monopole Rating: 99% SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The existing 90 ft. Stealth Monopole located in Suffolk County (23300 Main Road, Orient Point), NY is structurally acceptable based upon the EIA-222-G 2005 Standard and the New York State Building Code with the proposed equipmen~talled. If any other changes are proposed, another structural analysis should be performed to assure the tower is in compliance / conformance with the applicable codes and standards. Should any further questions arise, please contact the Global Tower Services, LLC Engineering Department at 605-422-1548. OF NFW ~P pE1 r. o y0 Global Tower Services, LLC Reviewed By: 9 r n f cc O y~• 07235 4~~a Cory Blake, E.I.T. Michael T. De Boer, P.E. 9~f~~S1 hA~' GTS Engineering Director of Engineering S Z 9 ~L Global Tower Services, LLC May 18, 2012 Orient Point NY-5015 Standard Conditions All engineering services are performed on the basis that the information used is current and correct. This information may consist of, but not necessarily limited, to: - Information supplied by the client regarding the structure itself, the antenna and transmission line loading on the structure and it components, or relevant information. - Information from drawings in possession of Global Tower Services, LLC, or generated by field inspections or measurements of the structure. It is the responsibility of the client to ensure that the information provided to Global Tower Services, LLC and used in the performance of our engineering services is correct and complete. In the absence of information contrary, we consider that all structures were constructed in accordance with the drawings and specifications and are in an un- corroded condition and have not deteriorated; and we, therefore consider that their capacity has not significantly changed from the original design condition. All services will be performed to the codes and standards specified by the client, and we do not imply to meet any other code and standard requirements unless explicitly agreed to in writing. If wind and ice loads or other relevant parameters are to be different from the minimum values recommended by the codes and standards, the client shall specify the exact requirements. In the absence of information to the contrary, all work will be performed in accordance with the revision of ANSI/TIA/EIA-222 requested. All services are performed, results obtained and recommendations made in accordance with the generally accepted engineering principles and practices. Global Tower Services, LLC is not responsible for the conclusions, opinions and recommendations made by others based on the information we supply. Global Tower Services, LLC May 18, 2012 Orient Point NY-5015 Disclaimer of Warranties The engineering services by Global Tower Services, LLC in connection with this Structural Analysis are limited to a computer analysis of the tower structure, size and capacity of its members. Global Tower Services, LLC does not analyze the fabrication, including welding, except as included in this report. The purpose of this report is to assess the feasibility of adding appurtenances usually accompanied by transmission lines. Any mention of structural modifications are reasonable estimates and should not be used a precise construction document. Precise modification drawings are obtainable from Global Tower Services, LLC but are beyond the scope of this report. Global Tower Services, LLC makes no warranties, expressed or implied, in connection with this report and disclaim any liability arising from material, fabrication and erection of this tower. Global Tower Services, LLC will not be responsible whatsoever for or on account of, consequential or incidental damages sustained by any person, firm, or organization as a result of any data or conclusions contained in this report. The maximum liability of Global Tower Services, LLC pursuant to this report will be limited to the total fee received for preparation of this report. • TSTOwer - v 5.2.1 Tower Analysis Program Licensed to: Global Tower Partners (c) 1997-2010 TowerSoft www.TSTower.com Boca Raton FL File: C:\TSTower\TSTOWER Input\NY-5015_SA Verizon_051612.out Contract: Revision: Project: Structural analysis of 90' Flagpole Site: NY-5015 (Orient Point) Date and Time: 5/29/2012 2:00:24 PM Engineer: Nike De Boer DESIGN SPECIFICATION Design Standard: ANSIfiIA-222-0-2005 Add.2 Basic Wind Speed (No Ice) = 120.0 (mph) Basic Wind Speed (With Ice) = 50.0 (mph) i Design Ice Thickness = 0.75 (in) Structure Class = II Exposure Category = C Topographic Category = 1 Sct. Length Overlap Top Dia.Bot Dia. Thick. (ft) (ft) (in) (in) (in) 1 45.00 0.00 33.50 41.38 0.2500 2 45.00 0.00 12.75 12.75 0.5000 90.00 MAXIMUM BASE REACTIONS Download (Kips) 32.5 Shear (Kips) 16.6 Moment (Kipsft) 897.9 Appendix 1 TSTower - v 5.2.1 Tower Analysis Program Licensed to: Global Tower Partners (c) 1997-2010 TowerSoft www.TSTower.com Boca Raton FL File: C:\TSTower\TSTOWER Input\NY-5015_SA Verizen_051612.Out Contract: Revision: Project: Structural analysis of 90' Flagpole Site: NY-5015 (Orient Point) Date and Time: 5/29/2012 2:00:24 PM Engineer: Mike De Boer Section A: PROJECT DATA Project Title: Structural analysis of 90' Flagpole Customer Name: Verizon Wireless Site: NY-5015 (Orient Point) Contract No.: Revision: Engineer: Mike De Boer Date: May 29 2012 Time: 01:59:36 PM Design Standard: ANSI/TIA-222-G-2005 Addendum 2 GENERAL DESIGN CONDITIONS Start wind direction: 0.00 (Deg) End wind direction: 330.00 (Deg) Increment wind direction: 30.00 (Deg) Elevation above ground: 0.00(ft) Gust Response Factor Gh: 1.10 Structure class: II Exposure category: C Topographic category: 1 Material Density: 490.1(lbs/ft^3) Young's Modulus: 29000.0(ksi) Poisson Ratio: 0.30 Weight Multiplier: 1.00 WIND ONLY CONDITIONS: Basic Wind Speed (No Ice): 120.00(mph) Directionality Factor Ed: 0.95 Importance Factor I: 1.00 Wind Load Factor: 1.60 Dead Load Factor: 1.20 WIND AND ICE CONDITIONS: Basic Wind Speed (With Ice): 50.00(mph) Directionality Factor Ed: 0.95 Wind Load Importance Factor Iw: 1.00 Ice Thickness Importance Factor Ii: 1.00 Ice Thickness: 0.75(in) Ice Density: 56.19(lbs/ft^3) Wind Load Factor: 1.00 Dead Load Factor: 1.20 Ice Load Factor: 1.00 WIND ONLY SERVICEABILITY CONDITIONS: Serviceability Wind Speed: 60.00(mph) Directionality Factor Rd: 0.85 Importance Factor I: 1.00 Wind Load Factor: 1.00 Dead Load Factor: 1.00 Analysis performed using: TowerSoft Finite Element Analysis Program Page A 1 TSTower - v 5.2.1 Tower Analysis Program Licensed to: Global Tower Partners (c) 1997-2010 TowerSoft wvw.TSTower.com Boca Raton FL File: C:\TSTower\TSTOWER Input\NY-5015 _SA Verizon_051612.out Contract: Revision: Project: Structural analysis of 90, Flagpole Site: NY-5015 (Orient Point) Date and Time: 5/29/2012 2:00:24 PM Engineer: Mike De Boer Section B: STRUCTURE GEOMETRY Total Height Bottom Diameter Top Diameter (ft) (in) (in) 90.00 41.38 12.75 Sect. Length Overlap Bet Dia. Top Dia. Thick. Sides Joint Type Yield Mass Calculated No Stress Taper (ft) (ft) (in) (in) (in) (ksi) (lbs) (in/ft) 1 . 45.00 0.00 41.38 33.50 0.2500 18-sided Flange 65.0 4518.8 0.17500 2 45.00 0.00 12.75 12.75 0.5000 Circular Flange 50.0 2946.8 0.00000 Total Mass: 7465.5 Page B 1 TSTower - v 5.2.1 Tower Analysis Program Licensed to: Global Tower Partners (c) 1997-2010 TOwerSoft www.TSTower.com Boca Raton FL File: C:\TSTowar\TSTOWER Input\NY-5015_SA Verison_051612.out Contract: Revision: Project: Structural analysis of 901 Flagpole Site: NY-5015 (Orient Point) Date and Time: 5/29/2012 2:00:24 PM Engineer: Mike De Boer Section D: TRANSMISSION LINE DATA Transmission Lines Position No. Bot E1 Top El Desc. Radius Az. Orient. No. Shielded Shielded Antenna (ft) (ft) (ft) Lines 1 0.00 90.00 LDF5P-50A 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 Yes 1 2 5.00 83.00 LDF5P-50A 0.00 0.00 0.00 12 Yes 12 3 5.00 73.00 LDF5P-50A 0.00 0.00 0.00 12 Yes 12 4 5.00 67.50 LDF5P-50A 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 Yes 6 5 5.00 45.50 LDF4P-50A 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 Yes 4 Transmission Lines Details No. Desc. width Depth Unit Mass (in) (in) (lb/ft) 1 LDF5P-50A 1.10 1.10 0.33 2 LDF5P-50A 1.10 1.10 0.33 3 LDF5P-50A 1.10 1.10 0.33 4 LDF5P-50A 1.10 1.10 0.33 5 LDF4P-50A 0.63 0.63 0.15 Utilization of the cross-section for TX Lines: 27.29% Page D 1 TSTower - v 5.2.1 Tower Analysis Program Licensed to: Global Tower Partners (c) 1997-2010 TowerSoft www. TSTower.com Boca Raton FL File: C:\TSTower\TSTOWER Input\NY-5015 _SA Verizon_051612.out Contract: Revision: Project: Structural analysis of 90' Flagpole Site: NY-5015 (Orient Point) Date and Time: 5/29/2012 2:00:24 PM Engineer: Nike De Boer Section F: POINT LOAD DATA Structure Azimuth from North:0.00 POINT LOADS No. Description Elev. Radius Azim. Orient. Vertical Tx Line Comments Offset (ft) (ft) (Deg) (Deg) (ft) 1 4' Omni 92.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 Fire Dept 2 Stealth Section 85.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 3 12x18' Flag 84.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 4 3 Panel Antennas 83.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 ATT 5 Stealth Section 75.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 6 3 Panel Antennas 73.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 Sprint 7 (3) X7CAP-480i 67.50 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 VZW 8 Stealth Section 65.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 9 (3) X7C-480 62.50 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 VZW 10 Stealth Section 55.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 11 Stealth Section 47.50 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 12 (4) Omni Antenna 45.50 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 Fire Dept 13 (4) Side Arms 45.50 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 Fire Dept POINT LOADS WIND AREAS AND WEIGHTS No. Description Frontal Lateral Frontal Lateral Weight Weight Gh Bare Area Bare Area Iced Area Iced Area Bare Iced (ft^2) (ft^2) (ft^2) (ft^2) (Kips) (Kips) 1 4' Omni 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 0.02 0.03 1.10 2 Stealth Section 19.50 19.50 20.51 20.51 0.10 0.20 1.10 3 12x18' Flag 18.36 18.36 18.36 18.36 0.50 0.50 1.10 4 3 Panel Antennas 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 1.10 5 Stealth Section 20.32 20.32 21.32 21.32 0.10 0.20 1.10 6 3 Panel Antennas 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 1.10 7 (3) X7CAP-480i 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 1.10 B Stealth Section 21.13 21.13 21.63 21.63 0.10 0.20 1.10 9 (3) X7C-480 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 1.10 10 Stealth Section 21.94 21.94 22.94 22.94 0.10 0.20 1.10 11 Stealth Section 11.27 11.27 11.77 11.77 0.10 0.20 1.10 12 (4) Omni Antenna 8.00 8.00 10.00 10.00 0.08 0.12 1.10 13 (4) Side Arms 8.00 8.00 12.00 12.00 0.12 16.00 1.10 Page F 1 TSTOwer - v 5.2.1 Tower Analysis Program Licensed to: Global Tower Partners (c) 1997-2010 TowerSoft www.TSTower.com Boca Raton FL File: C:\TSTower\TSTOWER Input\NY-5015_SA Verizon_051612.out Contract: Revision: Project: Structural analysis of 90' Flagpole Site: NY-5015 (Orient Point) Date and Time: 5/29/2012 2:00:24 PM Engineer: Mike De Boer Section K: POLE OUTPUT LOAD DATA Load Combination Max Envelope Wind Direction Maximum Elev. Axial Ld. Shear Ld. Torque Bend Mom. (ft( (kips) (kips) (kipsft) (kipsft) 90.00 0.64 1.10 0.00 0.23 82.50 0.64 1.10 0.00 8.41 82.50 2.19 3.63 0.00 8.43 75.00 2.19 3.63 0.00 35.61 75.00 3.35 5.52 0.00 35.67 67.50 3.35 5.52 0.00 77.03 67.50 4.54 6.91 0.01 77.12 60.00 4.54 6.91 0.01 128.64 60.00 5.65 8.25 0.01 128.74 52.50 5.65 8.25 0.01 190.55 52.50 7.84 9.85 0.01 190.66 45.00 7.84 9.85 0.01 264.19 45.00 24.23 11.90 0.01 264.25 37.50 24.23 11.90 0.01 353.59 37.50 25.69 12.81 0.01 353.61 30.00 25.69 12.81 0.01 449.75 30.00 27.18 13.70 0.01 449.76 22.50 27.18 13.70 0.01 552.12 22.50 28.70 14.55 0.01 552.14 15.00 28.70 14.55 0.01 661.37 15.00 30.26 15.37 0.01 661.37 7.50 30.26 15.37 0.01 776.30 7.50 31.78 16.19 0.01 776.30 0.00 31.78 16.19 0.01 897.92 Base 32.53 16.63 0.01 897.92 Page K 1 TSTower - v 5.2.1 Tower Analysis Program Licensed to: Global Tower Partners (c) 1997-2010 TowerSoft www.TSTOwer.com Boca Raton FL File: C:\TSTower\TSTOWER Input\NY-5015_ SA_Verizon_051612.out Contract: Revision: Project: Structural analysis of 90' Flagpole Site: NY-5015 (Orient Point) Date and Time: 5/29/2012 2:00:24 PM Engineer: Mike De Boer Section L: STRENGTH ASSESSMENT DATA Load Combination Max Envelope Wind Direction Maximum Elev. Axial Ld. Axial Cap Moment Mom. Cap Assess. (ft) (kips) (kips) (kipsft) (kipsft) 90.00 0.64 865.90 0.23 281.52 0.001 82.50 0.64 865.90 8.41 281.52 0.030 82.50 2.19 865.90 8.43 281.52 0.032 75.00 2.19 865.90 35.61 281.52 0.128 75.00 3.35 865.90 35.67 281.52 0.129 67.50 3.35 865.90 77.03 281.52 0.276 67.50 4.54 865.90 77.12 281.52 0.278 60.00 4.54 865.90 128.64 281.52 0.461 60.00 5.65 865.90 128.74 281.52 0.462 52.50 5.65 865.90 190.55 281.52 0.682 52.50 7.84 865.90 190.66 281.52 0.683 45.00 7.84 865.90 264.19 281.52 0.944 45.00 24.23 1803.71 264.25 1234.01 0.218 37.50 24.23 1848.03 353.59 1314.61 0.272 37.50 25.69 1848.03 353.61 1314.61 0.273 30.00 25.69 1890.32 449.75 1396.11 0.326 30.00 27.18 1890.32 449.76 1396.11 0.327 22.50 27.18 1930.56 552.12 1478.35 0.378 22.50 28.70 1930.56 552.14 1478.35 0.378 15.00 28.70 1968.76 661.37 1561.17 0.428 15.00 30.26 1968.76 661.37 1561.17 0.429 7.50 30.26 2004.93 776.30 1644.39 0.477 7.50 31.78 2004.93 776.30 1644.39 0.478 0.00 31.78 2039.05 897.92 1727.85 0.525 Page L 1 TSTower - v 5.2.1 Tower Analysis Program Licensed to: Global Tower Partners (c) 1997-2010 TowerSoft www. TSTower.com Boca Raton FL File: C:\TSTower\TSTOWER Input\NY-5015 _SA Verizon_051612.out Contract: Revision: Project: Structural analysis of 90T Flagpole Site: NY-5015 (Orient Point) Date and Time: 5/29/2012 2:00:26 PM Engineer: Mike De Boer Section M: SECTION PROPERTIES DATA Elev. Diam. Width Thick. W/t Area S (it) (in) (in) (in) (in-2) (in-3) 90.0 12.8 12.8 0.500 25.5 19.2 56.71 82.5 12.8 12.8 0.500 25.5 19.2 56.71 82.5 12.8 12.8 0.500 25.5 19.2 56.71 75.0 12.8 12.8 0.500 25.5 19.2 56.71 75.0 12.8 12.8 0.500 25.5 19.2 56.71 67.5 12.8 12.8 0.500 25.5 19.2 56.71 67.5 12.8 12.8 0.500 25.5 19.2 56.71 60.0 12.8 12.8 0.500 25.5 19.2 56.71 60.0 12.8 12.8 0.500 25.5 19.2 56.71 52.5 12.8 12.8 0.500 25.5 19.2 56.71 52.5 12.8 12.8 0.500 25.5 19.2 56.71 45.0 12.8 12.8 0.500 25.5 19.2 56.71 45.0 33.5 5.4 0.250 21.6 26.4 216.60 37.5 34.8 5.6 0.250 22.6 27.4 234.10 37.5 34.8 5.6 0.250 22.6 27.4 234.10 30.0 36.1 5.9 0.250 23.5 28.5 252.28 30.0 36.1 5.9 0.250 23.5 28.5 252.28 22.5 37.4 6.1 0.250 24.4 29.5 271.15 22.5 37.4 6.1 0.250 24.4 29.5 271.15 15.0 38.8 6.3 0.250 25.3 30.5 290.69 15.0 38.8 6.3 0.250 25.3 30.5 290.69 7.5 40.1 6.6 0.250 26.3 31.6 310.91 7.5 40.1 6.6 0.250 26.3 31.6 310.91 0.0 41.4 6.8 0.250 27.2 32.6 331.82 Note: w/t values marked with * (asterisk) indicate width to thickness exceeding maximum allowable values by standards. Page M 1 TowerSoft Tower - v 5.2.1 Monopole Analysis Program Licensed to: Global Tower Partners, Boca Raton FL (c) 1991-2012 ToverSoft, Mississauga, Ontario. Project: Structural analysis of 90' Flagpole Site: MY-5015 (Orient Point) Contract: Engineer: Mike De Boer BASE PLATE DETAILS I Rods spacing ~iia. = 46.880 Maximum Base Reactions r ' Axial Load(Kips) = 11.72 Shear Load(Kips) = 16.63 Bending Moment(Kipsft)= 897.92 Torque(Kipsft) = 0.01 Anchor Rod Data No of rods = 9 - - Grade = A36 Size = 2 in Lax * (in) = 0.000 Shear Load(Kips) = 1.85 Axial Load(Kips) = 103.46} Shear Cap.(Kips) = 61.49 r Axial Cap.(Kips) = 108.67 Assessment Ratio = 0.93 Plate Data Thickness (in) = 1.500 Inside di = 33.38 Grade = A572 gr.50 I Pole dia.~ = 41.375 Max. Stress(ksi) = 22.31 Allow. Stress(ksi) = 45.0 I Outside dia. = 53.130 Assessment Ratio = 0.5 Plate Bottom above Concrete * Lac = Length from top of concrete to bottom of anchor rod leveling nut. TSTower - v 5.2.1 Tower Analysis Program Licensed to: Global Tower Partners (c) 1997-2010 TowerSoft www. TSTower.com Boca Raton FL File: C:\TSTower\TSTOWER Input\NY-5015_SA Verizon_051612.out Contract: Revision: Project: Structural analysis of 90' Flagpole Site: NY-5015 (Orient Point) Date and Time: 5/29/2012 2:00:26 PH Engineer: Mike De Boer Horizontal Displacement Diagram Max. Envelope (All Loading Cases) Elevation (ft) 90.0 l i~ i~ i i I r i 1 1 r t 45.0 + i ~t i I. 0.0 Displacement (in) 8 16 24 31 39 47 Appendix 2 TSTower - v 5.2.1 Tower Analysis Program Licensed to: Global Tower Partners (c) 1997-2010 TOwerSoft www.TSTower.com Boca Raton FL File: C:\TSTower\TSTOWER Input\NY-5015_SA_Verizon_051612.out Contract: Revision: Project: Structural analysis of 90' Flagpole Site: NY-5015 (Orient Point) Date and Time: 5/29/2012 2:00:24 PM Engineer: Nike De Boer Ben dine Moment Diagram Max. Envelope (All Loading Cases) Elevation (ft) 90.0 45.0 0.0 Moment (Kipsft) 272 544 816 1088 1360 1632 Moment - Capacity Appendix 3 APPENDIX C Collocation Application GLOBAL TOWER PARTNERS C~P Collocation Application Check one: New Addition to Existing Modification Lease 89885 PLEASE RETURN THIS APPLICATION TO: nmewc@gtpsites.com GTP Site 9: NY-5105 GTP GTP Site Name: Orient Point 750 Park of Commerce Blvd E-Mail: rcrews@glpsites.cem GTP Date Received: 314-12 Suite 300 Revision Dales: 315-12.3-22-12 Boca Raton, FL 33487-3612 Office: (561) 8434116 RSM Approval: Anthony Gino 3f27112 Attn: Leasing Fax: (561) 982-7032 APPLICANTICARRIER INFORMATION Carder Name: Vedzon Wireless G;-W Name: Michael Hepp Cartier Site Name: Orient Point Contact Number. 9739034225 Carder Site Number. 157730 Contact Fax: 86&8445158 Garner Legal Entity Name, NY SMSA Limited Partnership Contact Address: ~ N407871 State of registration: Type of entity (LP, LLC, Corp) dlblal (If applicable) Venzon Wireless Notice Address for Lease: No Change Contact E-mail: Mk I.he leWireb .cem With copies to: Additleml E-mail: Cartier Invoice Address: No Change Other: Cartier Invoice Contact - No Change Carver NOCI Name, Tile, Phone No. ADDITIONAL CARRIER INFORMATION Leasing Contact Name!Number: Michael Heipp RF Contact NamelNumber. AIi AI'ibon 1914.714-72241ali.alibod rizomdmless.mm Construction Contad NamolN mlber Pete McCarthy 163"49-2730 Emergency Contact NameMumber. NNetwork Operators I8004t52-2671 SITE INFORMATION Latitude: 41 OB 32.9 N Exisliry Structure Type: FI le Longitude: 72 17 58.0 W Exiati Structure ll hC 90' Site Address: 23300 Main Street, Orient, NY 11957 Antenna E I ment S ecifications Sectore (1, 2,3 at, -it applicable) Equlpmerd Type Pane] Panel (Panel, Omni, RRU, TMA, RET, MW Dish etc.) installation Status Proposed Proposed (Existing, Proposed 9M) 7t - Red Carder AOL (I) 62' 6" 67961. Equipment Mount Height (R) 62'6' 67 6- Equipment Mound Type Existing mounts Existing mounts Equipment Ouanft 3 3 Equipment Manufacturer CSS CSS Equipment Model• X7C480 X7CAP 8801 Equipment Weight (px gam in ts)) 20 30 Equipment Dhmndoe (HxWxD) 50.5"x 12.5' x -5'.14 6." x TV (Indicate fed winches) 798" TOTAL 9 of LINES for equipment in 6 6 column Lim Type Coax Coax Lim DlarekrlSW 718" 718" GLOBAL TOWER PARTNERS CTP Collocation Application OrleMetionlAzimuth (depress from 10212221342 10212221342 true north) Mechanical Tilt (degrees) 0 0 TX Frequency 746-7571880- 746-7571880- 89411945- 89411945- 1950 1950 RX Frequency 776 - 7871835 - 776 - 7871835 - 84911870 -1875 84911870 -1875 ERP r/mtts) NA NA Type of Teohnoloay (i.e. 3G, LTE, LTE I COMA I LTE )CDMA I PCS CMDAets) PCS Will RRU's be Installed behind Antennas r yes r No It no, please explain: no RRU's to be use. 13- FIBER: 7 Yes r Nano Is Provider? 1 1 Venzon PLEASE NOTE • All Equipment Lines are required to be installed inside the tower when span is available. Carriers Said be charged an adddlonal $25.00 per sae per month If equipment limn are Installed on the outside of the tower even though there Is available spars inside the tower. GTP must approve am IratsllaUOn of lines on the outside of towers prior to installation wmmeneement GROUND SPACE REQUIREMENTS Total around Area Dimensions Recu red Ilenats x 12 x 30 shelter Generator. ? esel ? Propane ? Naturel Gas width x hegM in fl.l Pad Dimensim ltDiX W, ft : Cabinet Pad Dimensons Cabinet Manuladurer Shelter Pad Dimensions 12 x 30' Shelter Manufacturer AC POWER REQUIREMENTS Voltage: Total Amperage Comments: Scope of Work- Verizon will be removing the 6 existing antennas at this site and replacing them with the 6 proposed antennas on this application as described above. No new coax cables or diplexers are to be installed as part of this work. FlatilliCAdluffidw ?ale Tower: e 6 panel antennas 0 12 71T coax cables PINNACLE TELECOM GROUP Professional and Technical Services ram c~wa~ ANTENNA SITE FCC RF COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT ANd REPORT PREPAREd FOR NEW YORk SMSA LimiTEd PARTNERShip d/b/A VERIZON WIRELESS "ORIENT POINT x#064" SITE 23300 MAIN STREET ORIENT, NY MARCH 27, 2012 14 RidGEdAIE AVENUE I SUITE 209 • CEdAR KNORS, NJ 07927 • 973-451.1630 CONTENTS INTROdUCTION ANd SUMMARY 3 ANTENNA ANd TRANSMISSION DATA 5 COMPLIANCE ANALYSIS COMPLIANCE CONCIUSION 12 CERTIFICATION 13 Appendix A. BAckgROUNd ON THE FCC MPE LIMIT AppENdix B. SUMMARY OF EXPERT QUAIKICATIONS 2 INTROdUCTION ANd SUMMARY At the request of New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon Wireless"), Pinnacle Telecom Group has performed an independent expert assessment of radiofrequency (RF) levels and related FCC compliance for the modification of an existing wireless base station antenna operation on an existing flagpole at 23300 Main Street in Orient, NY. Verizon Wireless refers to the site as "Orient Point #064", and the antenna modifications are proposed so Verizon Wireless can effectively operate under its licensed frequencies including 700 MHz, 850 MHz, and 1900 MHz. The FCC requires wireless system operators to perform an assessment of potential human exposure to radiofrequency (RF) fields emanating from all the transmitting antennas at a site whenever antenna operations are added or modified, and to ensure compliance with the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limit in the FCC regulations. In this case, the flagpole supports other existing wireless antenna operations by Sprint-Nextel, AT&T, and the Orient Fire Department the RF effects of which will be included in this compliance assessment. This report describes a mathematical analysis of compliance with the FCC MPE limit for safe continuous exposure of the general public. The RF effects of the antennas are calculated using a standard FCC formula - and the analysis is designed to conservatively overstate the RF levels that actually occur from the antennas. In that way, as long as the results indicate RF levels below the MPE limit, we can have great confidence the compliance requirement is satisfied. The results of a compliance assessment can be explained in layman's terms by describing the calculated RF levels as simple percentages of the FCC MPE limit. If the reference for that limit is 100 percent, then calculated RF levels higher than 100 percent indicate the MPE limit is exceeded, while calculated RF levels consistently lower than 100 percent serve as a clear and sufficient demonstration of compliance with the MPE limit. We will also describe the overall worst-case calculated result via the "plain-English" equivalent "times-below-the-limit factor". 3 The result of the FCC RF compliance assessment in this case is as follows: ? The conservatively calculated maximum RF level from the combination of the Verizon Wireless antenna operations, as modified, along with all the other antenna operations at the site, is 2.8289 percent of the FCC MPE limit - well below the 100-percent reference for compliance. In other words, even with the significant degree of conservatism incorporated in the analysis, the worst-case calculated RF level is still more than 35 times below the FCC limit established as safe for continuous human exposure to the RF emissions from antennas. ? The results of the calculations provide a clear demonstration that the RF levels from the combination of proposed and existing antenna operations at the site satisfy the applicable criteria for controlling potential human exposure to RF fields, and the RF levels will be in clear compliance with the FCC regulations and limit concerning RF safety. Moreover, because of the conservative methodology and incorporated assumptions, RF levels actually caused by the antennas will be even less significant than the calculation results here indicate. The remainder of this report provides the following: ? relevant technical data on the Verizon Wireless antenna operations as modified, along with data on the other existing antenna operations at the site; ? a description of the applicable FCC mathematical model for assessing MPE compliance, and application of the relevant technical data to that model; and ? the results of the analysis, and the compliance conclusion for the site. In addition, Appendix A provides background on the FCC MPE limit, along with a list of FCC references on compliance, and Appendix B summarizes the expert qualifications of the author of this report. 4 ANTENNA ANd TRANSMISSION DATA The table below provides the key compliance-related data for the Verizon Wireless antenna operations, as proposed to be modified, at the site. General Data is, s . uF N 'n, Mug Frequency Bands 700 MHz, 850 MHz and 1900 MHz Service Coverage Type Sectorized Antenna Type Directional Panel Antenna Centerline Hei ht AGL 62 ft. 6 in., 67 ft. 6 in. 77,7 p,7, 700 MHz Antenna Data p ? , Antenna Model CSS X7CAP-480-1i Antenna Maximum Gain 12.7 dBi RF Channels per Sector 1 Transmitter Power / RF Channel 40 watts IM M". 850 MHz Antenna Data B ;r- Antenna Model CSS VC-480 Antenna Maximum Gain 13.5 dBi RF Channels per Sector 8 Transmitter Power / RF Channel 20 watts S k.: S~v: 1900 MHz Antenna Data _ y 211110111 Antenna Model CSS X7CAP-480-i Antenna Maximum Gain 16.0 dBi RF Channels per Sector 4 Transmitter Power / RF Channel 16 watts Note that in the analysis, we will conservatively ignore the power-attenuation effects associated with the antenna cabling ("antenna line loss".) The antenna vertical-plane radiation pattern is used in the calculations of RF levels at ground level around a site. Figures 1 through 3 that follow show the vertical-plane radiation patterns of the antenna model proposed by Verizon Wireless. Note that in this type of diagram, the antenna is effectively pointed at the three o'clock position (the horizon) and the relative strength of the pattern at different angles is described using decibel units. 5 Figure 1. CSS X7CAP-480-i Antenna - 700 MHz Vertical-plane Pattern Allk O deg horizon 5dB/ division 1IT7 Figure 2. CSS X7C-480 Antenna - 850 MHz Vertical-plane Pattern 0 deg horizon 5 dB / division 6 Figure 3. CSS X7CAP-480-i Antenna -1900 MHz Vertical-plane Pattern horizon 0dB O deg / d ivisio n As noted at the outset, there are existing antenna operations to include in the compliance assessment. For each of the cellular carriers, we will conservatively assume operation with maximum channel capacity and at maximum transmitter power. For the other operator, we will rely on the parameters in their respective FCC licenses. Sprint-Nextel licensed to operate in the 851 MHz frequency band. There is a maximum of 12 RF channels in each sector, and each channel is set for a maximum of 100 watts of effective radiated power (for which the equivalent antenna input power is less than six watts). AT&T is licensed to operate in the 700, 850 and 1900 MHz frequency bands. In the 700 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as four RF channels per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 40 watts. In the 850 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as eight RIP channels per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 20 watts. In the 1900 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as four RF channels per antenna sector, with a maximum of 16 watts of transmitter power per channel. 7 FCC records show the Orient Fire Department is licensed to operate in the 46 MHz band, with an effective radiated power (ERP) of 30 watts. The Fire Department are also licensed to operate in the 450 MHz band, with an ERP of 35 watts. COMPLIANCE ANAIy515 FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin 65 ("OET Bulletin 65') provides guidelines for mathematical models to calculate the RF levels at various points around transmitting antennas. At street-level around an antenna site (in what is called the "far field" of the antennas), the RF levels are directly proportional to the total antenna input power and the relative antenna gain in the downward direction of interest - and the levels are otherwise inversely proportional to the square of the straight-line distance to the antenna. Conservative calculations also assume the potential RF exposure is enhanced by reflection of the RF energy from the ground. Our calculations will assume a 100% "perfect" reflection, the worst-case approach. The formula for street-level RF compliance calculations for any given wireless antenna operation is as follows: MPE% _ (100 * TxPower * 10 (cmax-vdlsc/to) * 4) MPE * 4n * R2 ) where MPE% = RF level, expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit applicable to continuous exposure of the general public 100 = factor to convert the raw result to a percentage TxPower = maximum net power into antenna sector, in milliwatts, a function of the number of channels per sector, the transmitter power per channel, and line loss 10 (cmax-vdisc/,0) = numeric equivalent of the relative antenna gain in the downward direction of interest, referenced to any applied antenna mechanical downtilt; data on the antenna vertical-plane pattern is taken from manufacturer specifications 8 4 = factor to account for a 100-percent-efficient ground reflection, and the squared relationship between RF field strength and power density (22 = 4) MPE = FCC general population MPE limit R = straight-line distance from the RF source to the point of interest, centimeters The MPE% calculations are performed out to a distance of 500 feet from the facility to points 6.5 feet (approximately two meters, the FCC-recommended standing height) off the ground, as illustrated in Figure 4 below. antenna height from antenna bottom to 6.5' above ground level 0 - * 500 Ground Distance D from the site Figure 4. MPE% Calculation Geometry It is popularly understood that the farther away one is from an antenna, the lower the RF level - which is generally but not universally correct. The results of MPE% calculations fairly close to the site will reflect the variations in the vertical- plane antenna pattern as well as the variation in straight-line distance to the antennas. Therefore, RF levels may actually increase slightly with increasing distance within the range of zero to 500 feet from the site. As the distance approaches 500 feet and beyond, though, the antenna pattern factor becomes less significant, the RF levels become primarily distance-controlled, and as a result the RF levels generally decrease with increasing distance, and are well 9 understood to be in compliance. FCC compliance for a collocated antenna site is assessed in the following manner. At each distance point along the ground, an MPE% calculation is made for each antenna operation, and the sum of the individual MPE% contributions at each point is compared to 100 percent, the normalized reference for compliance with the WIFE limit. We refer to the sum of the individual MPE% contributions as "total MPE%", and any calculated total MPE% result exceeding 100 percent is, by definition, higher than the FCC limit and represents non-compliance and a need to mitigate the potential exposure. If all results are consistently below 100 percent, on the other hand, that set of results serves as a clear and sufficient demonstration of compliance with the MPE limit. The following conservative methodology and assumptions are incorporated into the MPE% calculations on a general basis: 1. The antennas are assumed to be operating continuously at maximum power, and at maximum channel capacity. In addition, the effects of antenna line loss are ignored wherever possible. 2. The power-attenuation effects of shadowing or other obstructions to the line-of-sight path from the antenna to the point of interest are ignored. 3. The calculations intentionally minimize the distance factor (R) by assuming a 6'6" human and performing the calculations from the bottom (rather than the centerline) of each operator's lowest-mounted antenna, as applicable. 4. The potential RF exposure at ground level is assumed to be 100-percent enhanced (increased) via a "perfect" field reflection from the intervening ground. The net result of these assumptions is to significantly overstate the calculated RF exposure levels relative to the levels that will actually occur - and the purpose of this conservatism is to allow very "safe-side" conclusions about compliance. The table on the next page provides the results of the MPE% calculations for each operator, with the worst-case result highlighted in bold in the last column. 10 Ground Verizon Verizon Verizon Wireless Wireless Wireless Sprint-Nextel AT&T Orient FD Total Distance 700 MHz 850 MHz 1900 MHz MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% A MPE% MPE% MPE% 0 0.0117 0.6133 0.0070 0.0162 0.0336 0.0033 0.6851 20 0.2059 0.4588 0.1434 0.0479 0.2962 1.0527 2.2049 40 0.1442 0.1222 0.1746 0.0632 0.3949 1.3116 2.2107 60 0.0338 0.0737 0.3569 0.1131 0.6906 1.1054 2.3735 80 0.0184 0.1556 0.1251 0.0051 1.2350 0.9330 2.4722 100 0.0094 0.3632 0.0989 0.1184 1.4346 0.8044 2.8289 120 0.0133 0.2359 0.0827 0.3428 1.0352 0.6994 2.4093 140 0.0050 0.0629 0.0061 0.3668 0.5416 0.5936 1.5760 160 0.0043 0.0655 0.0031 0.2580 0.1972 0.5068 1.0349 180 0.0272 0.2203 0.0012 0.1399 0.1693 0.4418 0.9997 200 0.0457 0.3079 0.0007 0.0486 0.3178 0.3995 1.1202 220 0.1103 0.6035 0.0051 0.0025 0.4131 0.3419 1.4764 240 0.1383 0.7064 0.0078 0.0013 0.5421 0.3012 1.6971 260 0.1716 0.7992 0.0117 0.0418 0.9868 0.2580 2.2691 280 0.2054 0.8928 0.0184 0.0778 1.1911 0.2296 2.6151 300 0.1798 0.7813 0.0161 0.1216 1.0443 0.2082 2.3513 320 0.2043 0.8678 0.0304 0.1076 1.2144 0.1835 2.6080 340 0.1816 0.7711 0.0270 0.1485 1.3815 0.1653 2.6750 360 0.2044 0.8103 0.0494 0.1924 1.2369 0.1477 2.6411 380 0.1839 0.7288 0.0444 0.1734 1.3635 0.1366 2.6306 400 0.2046 0.7743 0.0783 0.2168 1.2339 0.1235 2.6314 420 0.1858 0.7035 0.0712 0.1973 1.3449 0.1121 2.6148 440 0.1992 0.7370 0.1128 0.2322 1.2279 0.1047 2.6138 460 0.1825 0.6752 0.1034 0.2129 1.3151 0.0958 2.5849 480 0.1678 0.6208 0.0950 0.2467 1.2097 0.0881 2.4281 500 0.1548 0.5727 0.0877 0.2278 1.1164 0.0812 2.2406 11 As indicated, even with the significant degree of conservatism built into the calculations, the maximum calculated RF level is 2.8289 percent of the FCC MPE limit-well below the 100-percent reference for compliance. A graph of the overall calculation results, provided below, probably provides a clearer visual illustration of the relative insignificance of the calculated RF levels. The line representing the calculated total MPE% results shows an obviously clear and consistent margin to the FCC MPE limit. COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT RESULTS Normalized FCC MPE Limit + Total MPE% Results 120 U.1 100 2 O 80 a 60 e d 0 40 0 0 e 20 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 Distance (ft) COMPLIANCE CoNclu51oN According to the FCC, the MPE limit has been constructed in such a manner that continuous human exposure to RF emissions up to and including 100 percent of the MPE limit is acceptable and safe. The analysis in this case shows that the maximum calculated RF level from the combination of the Verizon Wireless antenna operations, as modified, along with the other existing antenna operations at the site, is 2.8289 percent of the FCC MPE limit. In other words, the worst-case calculated RE level from the combination of antenna operations is more than 35 times below the limit established as safe for continuous human exposure to the RE emissions from antennas. 12 The results of the calculations provide a clear demonstration of compliance with the FCC MPE limit. Moreover, because of the conservative calculation methodology and operational assumptions we applied in the analysis, RF levels actually caused by the antennas will be even less significant than the calculation results here indicate. CERTIFICATION It is the policy of Pinnacle Telecom Group that all FCC RF compliance assessments are reviewed, approved, and signed by the firm's Chief Technical Officer, who certifies as follows: 1. I have read and fully understand the FCC regulations concerning RF safety and the control of human exposure to RF fields (47 CFR 1.1301 et seq). 2. To the best of my knowledge, the statements and information disclosed in this report are true, complete and accurate. 3. The analysis of site RF compliance provided herein is consistent with the applicable FCC regulations, additional guidelines issued by the FCC, and industry practice. 4. The new Verizon Wireless antennas, as detailed herein, like the original antennas, will not produce more radiation which will cause them to not be in compliance with the FCC regulations. Moreover, the combined RF effects from the antenna operations at this site are in compliance with the FCC regulations and limit concerning potential RF exposure. ":z) 3/27/12 Danie ollins Date Chief T~ttnical 13 AppENdix A. BAckgROUNd ON TILE FCC MPE OMIT FCC Rules and Regulations As directed by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the FCC has established limits for maximum continuous human exposure to RF fields. The FCC maximum permissible exposure (MPE) limits represent the consensus of federal agencies and independent experts responsible for RF safety matters. Those agencies include the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In formulating its guidelines, the FCC also considered input from the public and technical community - notably the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). The FCC's RF exposure guidelines are incorporated in Section 1.301 at seq of its Rules and Regulations (47 CFR 1.1301-1.1310). Those guidelines specify MPE limits for both occupational and general population exposure. The specified continuous exposure MPE limits are based on known variation of human body susceptibility in different frequency ranges, and a Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) of 4 watts per kilogram, which is universally considered to accurately represent human capacity to dissipate incident RF energy (in the form of heat). The occupational MPE guidelines incorporate a safety factor of 10 or greater with respect to RF levels known to represent a health hazard, and an additional safety factor of five is applied to the MPE limits for general population exposure. Thus, the general population MPE limit has a built-in safety factor of more than 50. The limits were constructed to appropriately protect humans of both sexes and all ages and sizes and under all conditions - and continuous exposure at levels equal to or below the applicable MPE limits is considered to result in no adverse health effects or even health risk. The reason for two tiers of MPE limits is based on an understanding and assumption that members of the general public are unlikely to have had appropriate RF safety training and may not be aware of the exposures they receive; occupational exposure in controlled environments, on the other hand, is assumed to involve individuals who have had such training, are aware of the exposures, and know how to maintain a safe personal work environment. The FCC's RF exposure limits are expressed in two equivalent forms, using alternative units of field strength (expressed in volts per meter, or V/m), and power density (expressed in milliwatts per square centimeter, or mW/Cm2). The table on the next page lists the FCC limits for both occupational and general population exposures, using the mW/cm2 reference, for the different radio frequency ranges. 14 Frequency Range (F) Occupational Exposure General Public Exposure (MHz) ( mWlcm2) (mW/cm2 ) 0.3-1.34 100 100 1.34-3.0 100 180 / F2 3.0 - 30 900 / F2 180 / F2 30 - 300 1.0 0.2 300 - 1,500 F / 300 F / 1500 1,500 - 100,000 5.0 1.0 The diagram below provides a graphical illustration of both the FCC's occupational and general population MPE limits. Power Density (mW/cm2) 100 Occupational General Public 5.0 1.0 0.2 0.3 1.34 3.0 30 300 1,500 100,000 Frequency (MHz) Because the FCC's MPE limits are frequency-shaped, the exact MPE limits applicable to the instant situation depend on the frequency range used by the systems of interest. 15 The most appropriate method of determining RF compliance is to calculate the RF power density attributable to a particular system and compare that to the MPE limit applicable to the operating frequency in question. The result is usually expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit. For potential exposure from multiple systems, the respective percentages of the MPE limits are added, and the total percentage compared to 100 (percent of the limit). If the result is less than 100, the total exposure is in compliance; if it is more than 100, exposure mitigation measures are necessary to achieve compliance. Note that the FCC "categorically excludes" certain types of antenna facilities from the routine requirement to specifically (i.e., mathematically) demonstrate compliance with the MPE limit. Among those types of facilities are cellular antennas mounted on any type of tower, when the bottoms of the antennas are more than 10 meters (c. 32.8 feet) above ground. The basis for the categorical exclusion, according to the FCC, is the understanding that because of the low power and the directionality of the antennas, such facilities - individually and collectively - are well understood to have no significant effect on the human environment. As a result, the FCC automatically deems such facilities to be in compliance. FCC References on Compliance 47 CFR, FCC Rules and Regulations, Part 1 (Practice and Procedure), Section 1.1310 (Radiofrequency radiation exposure limits). FCC Second Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FCC 97-303), In the Matter of Procedures for Reviewing Requests for Relief From State and Local Regulations Pursuant to Section 332(c)(7)(s)(v) of the Communications Act of 1934 (1/VT Docket 97-192), Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation (ET Docket 93-62), and Petition for Rulemaking of the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association Concerning Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Preempt State and Local Regulation of Commercial Mobile Radio Service Transmitting Facilities, released August 25, 1997. FCC First Memorandum Opinion and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, released December 24, 1996. FCC Report and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, released August 1, 1996. FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields", Edition 97-01, August 1997. 16 APPENdIX B. SUMMARY OF EXPERT QUALIFICATIONS Daniel J. Collins, Chief Technical Officer, Pinnacle Telecom Group, LLC Synopsis: • 39 years of experience in all aspects of wireless system engineering, related regulation, and RF exposure • Has performed or led RF exposure compliance assessments on more than 14,000 antenna sites since the new FCC rules went into effect in 1997 • Has provided testimony as an RF compliance expert more than 1,300 times since 1997 • Accepted as an expert in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Pennsylvania and more than 40 other states, as well as b the FCC Education. • B E.E., City College of New York (Sch. Of Eng.), 1971 • M.B.A., 1982, Fairleigh Dickinson University, 1982 Bronx High School of Science 1966 Current Responsibilities: • Leads all PTG staff work involving RF safety and FCC compliance, microwave and satellite system engineering, and consulting on wireless technology and regulation Prior Experience: • Edwards & Kelcey, VP - RF Engineering and Chief Information Technology Officer, 1996-99 • Bellcore, Executive Director - Regulation and Public Policy, 1983-96 • AT&T (Corp. HO), Director - Spectrum Management Policy and Practice, 1977-83 AT&T Long Lines, Group Supervisor- Microwave Radio System Design, 1972-77 Specific RF Safety/ • Involved in RF exposure matters since 1972 Compliance Experience: • Have had lead corporate responsibility for RF safety and compliance at AT&T, Bellcore, Edwards & Kelcey, and PTG • While at AT&T, helped develop the mathematical models later adopted by the FCC for predicting RF exposure Have been relied on for compliance by all major wireless carriers, as well as by the federal government, several state and local governments, equipment manufacturers, system integrators, and other consulting I engineering firms Other Background: • Author, Microwave System Engineering (AT&T, 1974) • Co-author and executive editor, A Guide to New Technologies and Services (Bellcore, 1993) • National Spectrum Managers Association (NSMA) - former three-term President and Chairman of the Board of Directors; was founding member, twice-elected Vice President, a long-time member of the Board of Directors, and was named an NSMA Fellow in 1991 • Listed in Who's Who in the Media and Communication and International Who's Who in Information Technology • Published more than 35 articles in indust magazines 17 H w w W W N V/ ~ 0 a W a J 0 Q H_ H w z A " o~ ow z 5 rc W w~ 1 N 2 ven=A. on wireless U Z N N ~ W = W WEST NYACK, NEW YORK p W J p K LL Z O O ~ LL LL U N N d' V tp Z o 0 0 ° N M a WIRELESS CC COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY W W W W W K K fG K K a p N C ORIENT POINT F U y c a ° > R c En > a W Z J J W 23300 MAIN STREET J O Q d h O 3z Z W w = Q~a C C ORIENT, NY 11957 02 N 0 w Q N D LU Z OU m O z m w LIST OF DRAY 6~ U Q w DRAWINGS LL a < Q O U SITE INFORMATION T-1 TITLE SHEET & INC EET & INDEX Z2 w Oae~°' T, I- A-1 PLANS AND DETAI F z ND DETAILS ° zz VW SITE NAME: ORIENT POINT - - z U ! f LU VW SITE NUMBER. NY064 S I {fir 0U Ng0V a PROJECT LOCATION: 23300 MAIN STREET ` „ C-1 ANTENNA ORIENT, NY 11957 SITE TYPE/DESCRIPTION: REPLACE (6) EXISTING ANTENNAS Ail AT EXISTING LOCATIONS of ..I ADD NEW LTE CABINET IN EXIST IINU T 0 EQUIPMENT SHELTER . p wv ~ o0 - 5'- BUILDING CONTACT. GTP TOWERS LIC. SITE L_` P~r ILA I OCCUPANCY OR Y LEASING CONTACT MICHAEL HEPP _!i- - 25 (973) 903-4225 ,Pig b USE IS UNLAWFUL o °a WITHOUT CERTIFICATE LU CONSTRUCTION CONTACT: PETE McCARTHY I I 'L I I (631) 649-2730 - " +1 j iM A ~4v:~' a orie !d OF OCCUPANCY W U) ' - - I f IIII 11~4L 'vn s•nR ~ _ ENGINEER CONTACT SCOTT M. CHASSE 860-663-1697 .1 brneii ~14Y9t~ _ I 'q SL APPROVED AS NOTEEDD2 LATITUDE: 41° 08'33.5" N - _ r DATE~(.~07Y3 /2-B P. # LONGITUDE: 72° 1758.0" W'i it, I L., urn - ELEVATION 14' AMSL DISTRICT: 1000 - - NOTIFY BUILDING DEPART T AT SECTION: 18 765-1802 8 AM TO 4 P FOR THE - FOLLOWING INSPECTIONS: BLOCK 5 1. FOUNDATION - TWO REQUIRED Z LOTs 13.8 lif FOR POURED CONCRETE F v O ZONE: R-200, RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY C .u - IIII 2. ROUGH- FRAMING, PLUMBING, W R a M x STRAPPING, ELECTRICAL & CAULKING LLI ? r ^ S v 1 INSULATION 1 m y 4, FINAL - CONSTRUCTION & ELECTRICAL Z Y p = n omlowd MUST BE COMPLETE FOR C.O. C7 z o^? ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET THE w o m m o REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODES OF NEW W p 0 iii 1 rr YORK STATE. NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR o z Z DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION ERRORS. Q_ MY° 33 Q LOCATION MAP V MAP VICINITY MAP ELECTRICAL NTS SCALE: 1" = 500' INSPECTION REQUIRED NEw'" °F "O CHyS 0 G~ w. a w ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL II m x'T i MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODES OF NEW YORK STATE. opo o' F aPy>~ ny Ww~90/pEg6t0 s;; ZONING TABLE: SOLTHOLD R-200 RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY C ZONING DISTRICT EXISTING LESSEE (16) PORT ENTRY PANEL ITEM REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED WITH (14) 7/s'0 ANDREW COAX CABLES ww 35 ""90'......,, NO.. MAX HEIGHT.. RUN ON EXISTING ICE BRIDGE OVER G~/~ oa MIN, LOT AREA (BE) (SF) . ,572± NC 2000,000 ."226'± NO „ . LESSEE SHELTER TO EXISTING MONOPOLE Z V/ MIN LOT WIDTH (FT) EXISTING FIRE HOUSE Q J MIN, LOT DEPTH (FT) 400' 458.35± NO MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK(FT) 50' 83 08m NO "ENTRY PANEL MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK - ONE (FT) „ 30' 75.42'± NO MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK - BOTH (FT) „ 60' „ 155'- NO EXISTING LATTICE TOWER EXISTING LESSEE (16) PORT ENTRY PANEL WITH (14) 7/g"0 ANDREW COAX CABLES )AX CABLES Q W 4 MINIMUM REAR YARD SETBACK (FT) 1001. 21756- NO_ RUN ON EXISTING ICE BRIDGE OVER 3E OVER J Q MAX LOT COVERAGE 5% '55% NO EXISTING LESSEE EXISTING FENCED COMPOUND LESSEE SHELTER TO EXISTING MON OLI INO MON OLE 12'x30' EQUIPMENT a w NA = NOT APPLICABLE NO = NO CHANGE SHELTER L (6) EXISTING LESSEE ALPHA, BETA, AND a= EXISTING DIMENSIONAL NON-CONFORMITY RE GAMMA SECTOR PANEL ANTENNAS 4 L& m62-6" EXHAUST VENT REPLACE EX G O I AND -67-6" AGL TO BE REPLACED W/ (6) NEW Q I FILES NEW W w LE LESSEE CPS Z W m 0 PANEL ANTENNAS WITHIN RADOME LESSEE LTE 5 I AI > ANTENNAS (TYP 2-PL) Z a MOD CABINET F iSEE LTE rc BINET Q w O EXISTING 90' FLAGOLE _ 40 B ¢ i- w Lx CABLE RACEWAY BLE RACEWAY w - 42 EXISTING METER CENTER T ~z EXISTING NEXTEL EQUIPMENT ACK T ACK I w SHELTER ~ > DE6K DES BAT IL^'lllsl" "L I 424 00 ~ U °O U i Z N N W N=222" Q 102" EXHAUST FAN AN i REPLACE EXISTING Q W J i J LESSEE GPS F x ` ANTENNAS (rvP 2-PL.) m ~ LL EXISTING AT&T NOISE CERTIFICATION MON o 0 0 i EQUIPMENT - XFMR THE INSTALLATION OF THE NEW LTE THE NEW LTE CABINET IS WITH IN N N i PAD TELCO THE CONFINES OF THE EXISTING SOL EXISTING EQUIPMENT SHELTER v AND WILL THEREFORE NOT CREATE NOT CREATE ANY INCREASE IN F a o NOISE LEVELS AT THE EXISTING FACII EXISTING FACILITY 2 0 0 0 O N Q W W W W W -TER PLAN COMPOUND PLAN 3 SHELTER P SCALE : 1" =10'0" SCALE: /s" = 1'-0" LL O N GRAPHIC SCALE H OO f=/J o fo 0 o s io 30 40 U) m Z y o U) F T > Q J Z J p a IN FEET) Lu d > w a 1Inch=1o It Z ~O Z LLl w Z a~ o m m ui Q U) N O o Lu Z Ov co MAIN ROAD (S.R. 25) N 80'31'30" E > = O m W 226 00' a a3 v T a p K = Q J m U I m1~ w~ EXISTING NEXTEL ANTENNA h11 Till CONCEALMENT CYLINDER I- z o PAVED m E`f0 6 z AERA Q Irr`'i Z 0 0 a F rn OIL g EXISTING AT&T ANTENNA G%„I d ti 1 N Q CONCEALMENT CYLINDER F 0 Z Z 2 EXISTING ml CBS CBS Z U02. w FIRE 75'_6^± STATION (6)) EXISTING LESSEE ALPHA, BETA, Al Lam- X70AP-480-I(LTE) -PHA, BETA, AND GAMMA SECTOR PANEL j ~I II X7aaaO (PQS) o ° ry o 1 AfNTENNAS 4 @ ±62-6" AND ±6T-6" i 5'' AND --67-&A GL TO BE REPLACED W/ (6) ~la 30.0 Ibs X 0 Ibs O a NEW PANEL ANTENNAS WITHIN RADOME j j=-F 5 12 SF 4.38 SF U PAVED NEW PANEL, PAVED TAFRA yM' i ~ (7 in In in n I AFR it J Q a D 0 O N ~ If r ~..~47 23 30 E y , l a i +o CJ7 m +I W p~ 224,fi EXISTING 90' FLAGOLE - 10' FLAGOLE I it O a w ° Do L~- EXISTING FENCED COMPOUND - JOMPOUN? ryi ,.ymnN +i in O w 'Lr1 ° in @1 p D m ~ EXISTING EXISTING METER CENTER (BEYOND) - R (BEYOND) _ y 1 Q O p7V NSFORMER pZ Q w °D w Z ICE TOWER z N CEz OU O AERA BUILDING 1 EXISTING TRANSFORMER - 03 _ _ - - J EXISTING LATTICE TOWER - CLQ 1Q I EXISTING FIRE HOUSE - FIREHOUSE Q Z ¢ O W146" 771 125' ¢ w a Z 5 z7^ F Z f I 1N EXISTING AT&T EQUIPMENT PAD - PMENT PAD III j w w a O~ w O Z rn FRONT TOP SIDE FRONT FRONT TOP SIDE U WW dT SHELTER 0 W - u~ N"EXISTING NEXTEL EQUIPMENT SHELTER - J SHELTER ~I~[ w C w w V A 1 a SUBJECT SITE ~1o EXISTING LESSIEE 12'X30' EQUIPMENT SHELTER - f. ORIENT FIRE o j. DISTRICT °~a EXISTING LESSEE GPS ANTENNAS TO BE REPLACED (TYP 2PL) - D(IYP2PL) w F J W PANEL ANTENINAS J N z o°b N SECTION 16, ~m C Z r~ ~m BLOCK. O5; LOT 1 w - -_ii z_ w m PCTEL Hr m'~ 13.8 o m ~ ~ W GPS-TMG--2N p N 0 Z~ 1 3 ~ W Sn ILL O Z EXISTING (LESSEE (16) PORT ENTRY PANEL L 583'2%50" E WITH (114) 7 ANDREW COAX CABLES ITRY PANEL SAX CABLES iIDGE OVER W z3 57070' RUM ON EXISTING ICE BRIDGE OVER LESSEE SMELTER TO EXISTING MONOPOLE MONOPOLE STRUCTURAL NOTE PLEASE REFER TO STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Z_ 0 p2^ COMPLETED BY OTHERS. AVAILABLE UNDER C7 x~°a= wom'wo SEPARATE COVER GPS ANTENNAS W M M0' SITE PLAN REFERENCE y J 2 LL 1. PLOT PLAN & POLE ELEVAl1ON TITLED ORIENT FIRE a. nYa PREPARED FOR BEACON WIRELESS MANAGEMENT, P.O a SITE PLAN DISTRICT, 23300 MAIN ROAD, ORIENT, N.Y. 11957 SOUTHERN ELEVATION SCALE : 1 = 7U •U BOX 303, HAMPTON BAYS, NY 11946 REV. 4, DATED 02/23/06 MOVE COMPOUND BEHIND F.H.. PREPARED BY SCALE: 1"=15'4' :umcu~F,NE~nninyo., MICHAEL WALKER DESIGN/BUILDER LLC, 500 GRAPHIC SCALE 4 ANTENNA DET IA DETAILS P GRAPHIC SCALE HORSENECK ROAD, DARMOUTH, MA 02784 70 a 36 70 140 2W 2. SITE MEASUREMENTS TAKEN BY APT ENGINEERING is 0 o ].5 is au so SCALE : 3/q" = 1'-0" ON 01/11/12 AND 01 /16/12 'ey~A 10J 0~ y 3 IN FEET) (IN FEET) Q"°w ~~FESSIONP,.v`" i Inch = 70 ft. 1 Inch = 15 ft. "mnmm~~n, ANTENNA DATA ww EXISTING ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS a a o a SECTOR MODEL QTY ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL MECHANICAL STATUS CABLE AZIMUTH Q EXISTING UNIPOLE PROPOSED PROPOSED DOWN TILT DOWN TILT DOWN TILT SIZE w MOUNTING PIPE PANEL ANTE (TYP OF 6) -PANEL ANTENNAS (TYP OF 6) ALPHA PCSLADA-85408580 FF 1 - 0" 0' REPLACE (2)'/e" 102" Z O 0" REPLACE (2) /a" 102" Lu LL 'y=342° (CELL) Z Z a 1 (PCS/AWS) (LTE A-BLK) BETA CELL: ADA-85408580CF 1 - 0' PCS ADA-85408580CF 1 - 0" 0' REPLACE (2)'/a' 222" Q 0" REPLACE (2) Ys' 222" (LTE C-BLK) rc EXISTING 90' ,,,raWrym'~ FLAGOLE o w ~ z o i 0" REPLACE (2)'/e" 342" z° w o(CELL) RF TRANSPARENT_ ° GAMMA CELL: ADA-8540858Q)CF 1 - 0" PCS ADA-65408580CF 1 - 0" 0" REPLACE (2) 7/a" 342" ad PCS/AWS' EXISTING RADOME ( MOUNTS RADOME (LTE A-BLK) II ,O In (LTE C-BLK) Fz TOM w _,,,;6'\ IX=102" CPS N/A 2 REPLACE (2) Y2' N/A F 41 ryryryum. e. 2 R=222° :..e PROPOSED ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS N= V (CELL) SECTOR MODEL QTY ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL MECHANICAL NO OF CABLE AZIMUTH (PCS/AWS) DOWN TILT DOWN TILT DOWN TILT CABLES SIZE (LTE A-BLK) (LTE C-BLK) ALPHA X70-480(CELLULAR) 1 - 0° 0,2 REUSE EXISTING 102` W U 0^ 2 REUSE EXISTING 102" W N N EXISTING A • • _ EXISTING ANTENNA X7CAP-480-i(PCS/AWS) 1 - 0" SAME AS PCS (LTE C-BLK) HOUSING ASSEMBLY COMBINED WITH 850 (LTE A-BLK) 0 HOUSING A j w z J BETA X7C-480 (CELLULAR) 1 - 0l 2 REUSE EXISTING 222" p M LL X7CAP-480-1 (PCIS/AWS) 1 - 0" 0" 2 REUSE EXISTING 222" z M O 0 LL LL SAME AS PCS (LTiE C-BLK) COMBINED WITH 6501 (LTE A-BLK) = N GAMMA X7C-480 (CELLULAR) 1 - 0' 0' 2 REUSE EXISTING 342` - 0 0 0^ 2 REUSE EXISTING 342' Z o 0 X7CAP-480-1 (PC)S/AWS) 1 - 0" o o r r a (6) EXISTING LESSEE ALPHA, BETA, AND GAMMA SECTOR PANEL (6) EXISTING LESSEE ALPHA, BETA, AND GAMMA SECT GAMMA SECTOR PANEL SAME AS PCS (LTiE C-BLK) > > > > > ANTENNAS 4 @ =62'-6" AND ±67-6" AGL TO BE REPLACED W/(6) NEW ANTENNAS 4 @ 2621-6" AND z671-6" AGL TO BE REPLACE D BE REPLACED W/ (6) NEW COMBINED WITH 8501 (LTE A-BLK) W W W W W PANEL ANTENNAS WITHIN RADOME PANEL ANTENNAS WITHIN RADOME J RADOME CPS N/A 2 - - 2 REUSE EXISTING - x x x K OASTS AT EACH SECTOR (2) TOTAL TRIPLEXERS PER SECTOR 2 z TI NG DETAIL (2) RFS FTLBR5002 TRIPLEXERS TO BE INSTALLED ON ANTENN PIPE MASTS AT EACI Y a O N ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL 2 ANTENNA MOUNTING D SCALE: : %Z' C-1 SCALE : t CFW-A2: 4-LINES 2-ANTENNAS M4 a U ( O U) W > a C 700-850 W z XPOL 700-PCS/AWS J J G ~ IL v N O x x,x Z Z o > U im-Amphonol z 806-96011850-1990 MHz {NU O o Q y ADA-854X858XCF-EDIN w1,4 A7 A2 > z o m z 4 w w wane I PE F.1.11 o5:aA-! issr:a:~i • LL Q U wv°x R rt _ x _ m,u xuo 113/ " e g,I v - - _ - 39gu Q JO U owiri ago ~1 m 0. r - r"nurre"ol .LLA x x'x - Z L, - - mxn - u - - AA AA MIA 00 0 0 (L U u oz22 mmn.er.erw:e-oni 3,m -n:aa - o: wi n:4imi,,, ses.l ie:m" i^ n n . IYYkennxuRi°Inun r in Iu Z U a i uj W Qow o~np"r, 6 IBM~ QQ =E u1.~NN.+fV0HiH11AA~ omcinun" -Ann! Hui Oa R~ Ou1~RWdAw,.. ]Put„ Notlu[IFOnM1I V,lutlGrLLl G O a a ADA 85408580CF :,o,t, , 4n,tveM.Ka:,vw,~nralt _ cl) co .,w i nn. (fYP 6PL) WGT = 12.51k y. I in," W p~ 1•n< v mod r . IM-m.~4em O o .~nek";I LI 111 M, I'll, n", on. in,. rs3.,x In Q W NI ~ryi6EVmitl Ca'4{iM a 111.11 ~ „ Iq > 0 Z EXISTING UU 0 Q )SED w> wz PROPOSED PROPOSED DIPLEXER DIPLFX(ER DIPLEXER DIPLEXER < 11~~ O 1"0 Y/lfi' 7AC8B 7AC8B 7AC8BPA 7AC8BPA U w X7C-480 t X7CAP-480 0 O°o Xpol, BO' H-Beam Xpol. 80- H-Beams r Q Q - U U EaNrlcul6Pmlponr on6 MnnhaalaP*PlfInaLbnf IWLn a+~a~„ s ' El.en..l eM.ununc,v eo4n a:mn h lvo aamnLa4amn,.4nn ILI a aannv G911.Mln mFm cnnanaLnr a-.1 4Irl11"inW .1.111,1,, o _ ~ ~~uo aI eon 111 .11 In a 1, 1 Ad 11 1 lllnlnll~ ptlmborlon 61nnI,1In Pdd- Illm.nslm a{Iw 21 K 5 .12 4 k7 aln (1212: HYtl v,96mm LIZ,' IIedmL um 111.1 aIlld KO MH~ SECTO SECTOR. ALPHA BETA GAMMA BASEC 850: BASE COLOR. WHITE BLUE GREEN 850: GRAY GRAY GRAY Li 11.6 tlBl 'rd.l a 1 nrI a'In .1 13Y ae1 e ILI G 411 In H atlx nnlelgnAm(F 1polli Broi.111a Wle'll Y1gll1 DI 1 I I bn 'In .11 1fia,161 IIOIAn nu Fllnniwn Ii n5 v.m. n-d"nreFnnnl Ls= u1n11I'll mcimn olmnrer..- I I.r. 11 d-.,. I In nu F~r., r„n LTE-C. ienrr,.wa~swr~nn6w~3^r, LTE-C. RED RED RED -1 1, 6 Ciecl Oo9-d" R°Ineremmin 0.14° Fn, uann RL,Intl Midi rtlm,F.r1 Lrrs 3vacT l 1 srtl, ILd LTE-A: ORANGE ORANGE ORANGE 0 vaieremam m,; 1 441 nreae Fna1m. Vf4xLlbi 4Laxonl X7C-480 n~ml en.,nlwB ld sl,nn, 'c'=. 4' +..m...mlav VcV/Y.UYL"I", .1, rd lssm a1.e01 M1IGtl9 Woulpeatl,l,q W]Wtl4heq P P,511n 1:!L'L 11- IYamin2nan41nuemon~ 4ap hµ,1 P PCS: il- PCs: PURPLE PURPLE PURPLE Z eOlpr0 WgP SN noona aorta vVnx 1Sp Ratl:n4 wmnrneanmwl nerM U7rgon6w (TYP WGT=20# eswm, al,.n3 r,w ILLL "1 LL v,on.,wanx.renxalo =eoas srowvre .w.=„1. iW.4ni,,., ml n.o I Mann "I AWS' n~~~~o VO mar GPs AWS' YELLOW YELLOW YELLOW U CPS BROWN LU F o ; s u...lsla.4lea,@mow11 =16th E,."Lm.mm Lna. 1' 2° ..l1e, s 14 1-L9,e 1.=n n:no un 12, di oL,n. N11a&Z ass non I Wnl eon 'w.a Em,esnr:,,r"...., L..o:' ..1:ru elL E 'LH - I nanwdni Flm alld .nwm.or, rn xeEmIL mmx:o` '1, 1 ,ao~~Fim Fmo.nwm.oe n r,•m a~,mr°,;", piu~oapierm..+ on ru. al.nu m4:n alrc,annemlr er, cwmnronLF: rrmnwla.n.,nl~lm4mpn va,l, I. . Ln~i . r , 5omoan .u ee P14i"llm,l lnlPrw lp.m4mrn trlaML t,-,) n•i ^,.a.w~.rflq ev1111 cw a MIL Il" n nI..m Ia ,ao4n 12 1 m w~ae rnG.~rnn.aasra.,5san W °~mo0 YU~ F ,mNUnexl,l"llw, <I6oaev mo.mmes~n.e~i o1_. ew3l, n,mrma,.no Fpn vma.~vnorrvno~mlml °n :on aw<, wnwF1 r1,1r.n.u mw aW I'll Al s.pna[al D-111l1 Fame 4 Id' I ' ana ]JeCYI nI ILOL FUTURE FUTURE Z N c i C apg62r n,N 6alvanF.1p 91ea1/S,nmlv.n ale.l ~ 25/ ~ 7Xba fm ll'l, ~ Lo rl~ Gl FUTURE W 0 0 Z a SPLIT Q ? O Q Q 850 LTE-7/A LTE-7C PCS iFRANME FRAME r =iEt PCS-AWS f' w z n LL al ! ( r` RG _ L 4 fr e .1 7 L' LINE WITH a ro Y DIPLEXER Q Fri v a LII J"jn -L IC III ~I 1~I i Ilriil Fyw 11'i IL! ~'•.L . 4 I~au 1 _ x 1 LDE ail ~,G h~ r ~Il II I ~Ih ~ ~ II rIYI~.iiJ 3 II ~IJ<J~I17i1~" I ~ -1 -z LI h,-i / / T 9\uOF'~N~E°ruo, r _ X7CAP-480 (TYP 3PL) WGT = 30# O ' yi.P ,fit M. Cyq 9 P-. Avulleple Ntb Opu"P Im•1 mom. 1.4nne ALPHA, BETA, GAW GAMMA ANTENNAS )IAGRAM COAX ABLE DIAGW ~'O~iFO' Y F SIDE BY SIDE SCALE:NTS AAOFESSIC~~Pau`~. I I