HomeMy WebLinkAbout37383-Z
`y Town of Southold Annex 1/17/2014
P.O. Box 1179
54375 Main Road
* Southold, New York 11971
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
No: 36718 Date: 1/17/2014
THIS CERTIFIES that the building WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS
Location of Property: 21855 CR 48, Cutchogue,
SCTM 473889 Sec/Block/Lot: 96.4-19.1
Subdivision: Filed Map No. Lot No.
conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this officed dated
5/23/2012 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 37383 dated 7/23/2012
was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for
which this certificate is issued is:
modification to an existing wireless telecommunications facility & add an equipment cabinet as applied for (Verizon)
The certificate is issued to Junge, Arthur
(OWNER)
of the aforesaid building.
SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL
ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO. 37383 1/16/14
PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED
Aut Zi tature
+z TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE
, I SOUTHOLD, NY
BUILDING PERMIT
(THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES
WITH ONE SET OF APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED)
Permit 37383 Date: 7/23/2012
Permission is hereby granted to:
Junge, Arthur
418 Moulton Hill Rd
Lyman, NH 03585
To: modify an existing wireless telecommunications facility & add an equipment cabinet &
complete the Planning Board landscaping requirements as applied for
At premises located at:
21855 CR 48, Cutchogue
SCTM # 473889
Sec/Block/Lot # 96.-1-19.1
Pursuant to application dated 5/23/2012- and approved by the Building Inspector.
To expire on 1/22/2014.
Fees:
NEW COMMERCIAL, ALTERATION OR ADDITIONS $500.00
CO - COMMERCIAL $50.00
Total: $550.00
Buil ing Inspecto
Form No. 6
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
TOWN BALL
765-1802
APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
This application must be filled in by typewriter or ink and submitted to the Building Department with the following:
A. For new building or new use:
1. Final survey of property with accurate location of all buildings, property lines, streets, and unusual natural or
topographic features.
2. Final Approval from Health Dept. of water supply and sewerage-disposal (S-9 form).
3. Approval of electrical installation from Board of Fire Underwriters.
4. Sworn statement from plumber certifying that the solder used in system contains less than 2/10 of 1% lead.
5. Commercial building, industrial building, multiple residences and similar buildings and installations, a certificate
of Code Compliance from architect or engineer responsible for the building.
6. Submit Planning Board Approval of completed site plan requirements.
B. For existing buildings (prior to April 9, 1957) non-conforming uses, or buildings and "pre-existing" land uses:
1. Accurate survey of property showing all property lines, streets, building and unusual natural or topographic
features.
2. A properly completed application and consent to inspect signed by the applicant. If a Certificate of Occupancy is
denied, the Building Inspector shall state the reasons therefor in writing to the applicant.
C. Fees
1. Certificate of Occupancy - New dwelling $25.00, Additions to dwelling $25.00, Alterations to dwelling $25.00,
Swimming pool $25.00, Accessory building $25.00, Additions to accessory building $25.00, Businesses $50.00.
2. Certificate of Occupancy on Pre-existing Building - $100.00
3. Copy of Certificate of Occupancy - $.25
4. Updated Certificate of Occupancy - $50.00
5. Temporary Certificate of Occupancy - Residential $15.00, Commercial $15.00
Date. July 25, 2012
New Construction: X Old or Pre-existing Building: (check one)
Location of Property: 21855 C.R. 48 Cutchogue
House No. Street Hamlet
Owner or Owners of Property: Arthur V. Junge
Suffolk County Tax Map No 1000, Section 96 Block 1 Lot 19.1
Subdivision Filed Map. Lot:
3 3`~ New Yor A Limite Partnership a
Permit No. ~S d Date of Permit. Applicant:Verizon Wireless
Health Dept. Approval: Underwriters Approval:
Planning Board Approval:
Request for: Temporary Certificate Final Certificate: (check one)
Fee Submitted: $ 50.00
Re, Niels Huber & Coughlin, LLP
G 4S~r'1~ By.
nt : ture
John J. Coughlin
Attorney for Applicant, New York SMSA Limited
Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless
pF so
OUjyOlo
Town Hall Annex yy yy Telephone (631) 765-1802
54375 Main Road T T Fax (631) 765-9502
P.G. Box 1179 roger. richert(@town.soLithoId.ny.us
~
Southold, NY 11971-0959 i~
coufm
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
CERTIFICATE OF ELECTRICIAL COMPLIANCE
SITE LOCATION
Issued To: Venzon
Address: 21855 County Rt 48 City: Cutchogue St: NY Zip: 11935
Building Permit#: 37383 Section: 96 Block: 1 Lot: 19.1
WAS EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE
contractor: DBA: Costrotta Const Manag License No:
SITE DETAILS
Office Use Only
Residential Indoor Basement Service Only
Commerical X Outdoor 1st Floor Pool
New Renovation 2nd Floor Hot Tub
Addition Survey X Attic Garage
INVENTORY
Service 1 ph Heat Duplec Recpt Ceiling Fixtures HID Fixtures
Service 3 ph Hot Water GFCI Recpt Wall Fixtures Smoke Detectors
Main Panel A/C Condenser Single Recpt Recessed Fixtures CO Detectors
Sub Panel A/C Blower Range Recpt Fluorescent Fixture Pumps
Transformer Appliances Dryer Recpt Emergency Fixture Time Clocks
Disconnect Switches Twist Lock Exit Fixtures TVSS
Other Equipment: LTE antenna swap
Notes:
Inspector Signature: V-a/ Date: Jan 16 2014
81-Cert Electrical Compliance Form.xls
of SOON
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPT.
765-1802
INSPECTION
[ ] FOUNDATION 1ST [ ] ROUGH PLEIG.
[ ] FOUNDATION 2ND [ ] INSULATION
[ ] FRAMING / STRAPPING [ ] FINAL
[ ] FIREPLACE & CHIMNEY [ ] FIRE SAFETY INSPECTION
[ ] FIRE RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION [ ] FIRE RESISTANT PENETRATION
[ ] ELECTRICAL (ROUGH) ELECTRICAL (FINAL)
REMARKS:
DATE /G r INSPECTOR
FIELD INSPEMONREPORT DATE COMMENTS
U'ro
mu"ATION (IT)
w
v
FOUNDATION (2ND)
z
0
ROUGH FRAMING: &
PLUMBING
-C
INSULATION PER N. Y. y
STATE ENERGY CODE
` c-
FINAL
IL, Li
L~
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS r
c' S
,of). - ~ <bia-o 913 ra 5~. ' '~2G F{ - ~
y~
m
i,
n n i 3 awl I~
cyo,
L o
z
A
d
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST
BUILDING DEPARTMENT Do you have or need the following, before applying?
TOWN HALL Board of Health
SOUTHOL% NY 11971 4 sets of Building Plans
TEL: (631) 765-1802 Planning Board approval
FAX: (631) 765-9502 Survey
SoutholdTown.NorthFork.net PERMIT NO. 3? 3 lie 3 Check
Septic Form
N.Y.S.D.E.C.
Trustees
Flood Permit
Examined J-3 •20 / Stone-Water Assessment Form
Contact: Attorney for Applicant:
Approved ~3 20 2- Mail to; Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin, LLP
Disappro a/c 36 N. New York Ave., Huntington, NY 11743
Phone: 631-425-4100
fixpiratio 20
Building Inspector
LICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
MAY 2 3 2012 Date a 3 20 1.2
INSTRUCTIONS
BLDG.DEPT.
it. This iblifiatiTIALIST be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 4
sets of plans, accurate plot plan to sc e. ee according to schedule.
b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or
areas, and waterways.
c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit.
d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit
shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work.
e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector
issues a Certificate of Occupancy.
f. Every building permit shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of
issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date. If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the
property have been enacted in the interim, the Building Inspector may authorize, in writing, the extension of the permit for an
addition six months. Thereafter, a new permit shall be required.
APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the
Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or
Regulations, for the construction of buildings, additions, or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described. The
applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, building code, housing code, and regulations, and to admit
authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections.
New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless
(Signature of applicant or name, if a nttl4lEt)
Limited Partnership
4 Centerock Road, West Nyack, NY 10994
(Mailing address of applicant)
State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder
Applicant is Lessee
Name of owner of premises Arthur V. lunge
limited partnership (As on the tax roll or latest deed)
~faUnr~~Itc R 3 iaat st atIlCCO~dulyauth0r d officer
WJO J A t rte artders~n d/b/a Ve W Bless ue
Bv:
(Name and title o9 aoerpotata
Builders License No.
Plumbers License No. N/A
Electricians License No.
Other Trade's License No.
1. Location of land on which proposed work will be done:
21855 County Road 43 Cutchogue
House Number Street Hamlet
County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 96 Block I Lot 19.1 '
Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot
r
2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction:
a. Existing use and occupancy Commercial and public utility wireless telecommunications facility
b. Intended use and occupancy Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility
3. Nature of work (check which applicable): New Building Addition Alteration
Repair Removal - Demolition Other Work Lessee/Applicant propose to modify/upgrade
its exisintlpublicYcn( ti%wirele s tQ commnnj ations p@cili b e lacin Rine /9l gxistin a Ignnas with nine (9
units wttrft two (2/ new G~ t~nrt ane msfallmg on gadrttonal egwpment c"ktfill>i?~'8kis[ing shelter.
new ante as, re two( ) Cik
4. Estimated ~os~ ~ee
(To be paid on filing this application)
5. If dwelling, number of dwelling units N/A Number of dwelling units on each floor
If garage, number of cars Commercial and public
utility wireless telecommunications
6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of usefacility
7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front Rear Depth
Height Numbcrof Stories
Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Rear t
Depth Height Number of Stories
S. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front Rear Depth
Height Number of Stories
/ 45,589 square feet
9. Size of lot: Front Rear Depth
10. Date of Purchase 4/6/1987. Name of Former Owner Timothy Scott Gray
11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated Light Industrial District
12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? YES_ NO X
13. Will lot be re-graded? YES- NO X Will excess fill be removed from premises? YES X NO_
418 Moulton Hill Rd'.
14. Names of Owner of premises Arthur V. Junge Address Lyman. NH 03585 Phone No. 603-838-8982
Name of Architect APT Engineering Address 3 Saddlebrook Dr. Phone No 860-663-1697
Name of Contractor Addres\ t ragwort, CT 06419 phone No.
15 a. Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES NO x
* IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES & D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED.
b. Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? * YES_ NO x
* IF YES, D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED.
16. Provide survey, to scale, with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines.
17. If elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below, must provide topographical data on survey.
18. Are there any covenants and restrictions with respect to this property? * YES X NO
* IF YES, PROVIDE A COPY.
STATE OF NEW YORK)
SS:
COUNTY OF
jZd6+ _f& 4eyl- being duly sworn, deposes and says that (s)he is the applicant
(Name of individual signing contract) above named, r., .
(S)He is the Lessee / Applicant -
(Contractor, Agent Corporate Officer, etc.)
of said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application;
that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that the work will be
performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith.
Sworn to before me this l ' I
day of is 20 2 New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizo'nWireless
r r By u'~nh/ ~r10~.~ tin
Notary Public Signature o Applicant
Michael R. Bonhomme
Notary Public, State of New York Print Name / Title above
No. 01B06144229
Qualified in Orange County
Commission Expires 04/24/2ojf
37363
ho~aoF sovTyo6
Town Hall Annex Jf * Telephone (631) 765-1802
54375 Main Road H (63l) 76~.g5
P.O. Box 1179 fO ier.richerldeo n.gouUlolqQgnV us
Southold, NY 11971-0959
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL INSPECTION
REQUESTED BY.
I~ 0 4dG k Date: o t t ,
Company Name: Co trv{ tc~ Cf) S C' on v~,av~q n rc
Name: o
License No.:
Address: q 1~ p C IJ 1 1 5 2 a
Phone No.:
JOBSITE INFORMATION: (*Indicates required information)
*Name: C~~ Cl~ocr~n
*Address: t 43 S!~_C O u v~+ fZT y
*Cross Street: C o 1
*Phone No.: I
Permit No.: ?-3 3 8 3
Tax Map District: 1000 Section: Block: Lot:
*BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORK (Please Print Clearly) LTA q
S.,~aO
I
(Please Circle All That Apply)
*Is job ready for inspection:
ES NO Rough in Final
*Do you need a Temp Certificate: YES / NO
Temp Information (if needed)
*Service Size: 1 Phase 3Phase 100 150 200 300 350 400 Other
*New Service: Re-connect Underground Number of Meters Change of Service Overhead
Additional Information: PAYMENT DUE WITH APPLICATION
82-Request for Inspection Form i(k
G
5~~
FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY
SITE PLAN USE DETERMINATION
Initial Determination
DaterDate Sent: F f_I_1~
Project Name: <T
Project Address: CS" P ~'~'~^'~`xP
Suffolk County Tax Map No.:10001&_- - Zoning District: L_
Request: A...
-APIA
(Note: Copy of Building Permit Application and supporting documentation as to
proposed use or uses should be submitted.)
Initial Determination as to whether use is permitted: '/D c
Initial Determination as to whether site plan is required: YeA
Signature of Building inspector
Planning Department (P.D.) Referral:
P.D. Date Received: / / Date of Comment:
Comments:
Signature of Planning Dept. Staff Reviewer
Final Determination
Date: / /
Decision:
sionnthlrR of Rnildina InSnartnr
FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY <1 J C
1, R; I SITE PLAN USE DETERMINATION f-p-
initial Determination
. Date:_5_ 1-2-5-1 I,>- mc, Date Sent: fJ/,;L~
Project Name:
P 8t,.
Project Address: C1.4
Suffolk County Tax Map No.:10W0 - Zoning District: L_ -ro CA
Request:
(Note: Copy of Building Permit Application and supporting documentation as to
proposed use or uses should be submitted.)
Initial Determination as to whether use is permitted: yam
Initial Determination as to whether site plan is required: ~efS
Signature of Building Inspector
Planning Department (P.D.) Referral:
P.D. Date Received: I a4 Date of Comment 7 1 11
UtU~t
mments: ~-2 ~ci2 Qo1
• Qleo~ sell 0.~~ _
Sig ature o (anhhh( VrE
Final Determination JUL 2 0 2012
Date: 0 7
BLDG. DEPT.
TOWN OF SONHOLD
Decision:
Rinnahira nf Rlii f o Insn r
MAILING ADDRESS:
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS q soar P.O. Box 1179
DONALD J. WILCENSKI hQ~~ yQIO Southold, NY 11971
Chair
y .1L OFFICE LOCATION:
WILLIAM J. CREMERS T T Town Hall Annex
KENNETH L. EDWARDS G Q 54375 State Route 25
JAMES H. RICH III (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.)
MARTIN H. SIDOR lyCOUry 1 , Southold, NY
IY 1, Telephone: 631 765-1938
Fax: 631 765-3136
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
MEMORANDUM
To: Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector
From: Brian Cummings, Planner
Date: July 20, 2012
Re: Proposed Verizon Wireless LTE upgrades @ Junge
SCTM#1000-96: 1-19.1
As an addendum to the attached SPUD report, please be advised that the landscaping
requirement detailed in the approved April 6, 1992 site plan (Verizon formerly known as
"Nynex"), remains outstanding.
It is recommended that the completion of the landscaping requirement be included as a condition
to the issuance of a building permit for the proposed modifications and upgrades.
QTY. Scientific Name Common Name Size/Root Spacing
13 Pinus Strobifilrmis *Mexican Border Pine 5W H 10' o.c.
6 Pious Ni a Austrian Pine 5'-6' H 10' o.c.
4 Pinus Montana Mugho Pine 18"-24" 6' o.c.
Mu us
*"Mexican Border Pine" may be supplemented with (Picea Pungers, Colorado Blue Spruces)
depending on the availability of plant materials at implementation.
Thank you for your cooperation.
pF SOUTyolo
Town Hall Annex 411 Telephone (631) 765-1802
54375 Main Road Fax (631) 765-9502
P.O. Box 1179 -1W
Southold, NY 11971-0959 Ow N~
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
January 10, 2014
Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin LLP
36 N. New York Ave
Huntington, NY 11743
Re: 21855 CR 48, Cutchogue
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
The Following Items (if Checked) Are Needed To Complete Your Certificate of Occupancy:
/ Application for Certificate of Occupancy. (Enclosed)
? Electrical Underwriters Certificate. (Contact your electrician)
A fee of $50.00.
Final Health Department Approval.
Plumbers Solder Certificate. (Ali permits involving plumbing after 4!1/84)
Trustees Certificate of Compliance. (Town Trustees#765-1892)
Final Planning Board Approval. (Planning # 765-1938)
Final Fire Inspection from Fire Marshall.
Final Landmark Preservation approval.
Final inspection by Building Dept
BUILDING PERMIT: BP 37383- Modify an existing Telecommunications
Facility
RE, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
39 NORTH NEW YORK AVENUE
HUNTINGTON, NEW YORK 11743
TELEPHONE: (031) 425-4100
FACSIMILE: (931) 425-4104
Or G.v..Ei
WILLIAM J. NIELSEN
Mav 23. 2012
By Hand
Mr. Michael Verity
Building Department
town of Southold Annex Building
54 375 Route 25
Southold, NY 11971
RF.: New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon')
Proposal to modify existing telecommunications facility at
Premises: 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, New York
SCTM#: 1000-96- I - 19.1
Dear Mr. Verity:
\kc are the attorneys for Verizon in connection with its proposal to upgrade its existing facility at the
subject premises. The modification proposed is part of Verizon "LTE" project which will allow Verizon
to provide better, faster and more reliable service in the Town.
I he Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, codified at 47 United States Code §1455, a
copy of which is enclosed, provides that "a State or local government may not deny, and shall
approve, any eligible facilities request for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that
does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station." This proposal is an
"eligible facilities request" pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 1455(a)(2) as it proposes only to replace and collocate
certain transmission equipment. Specifically, Verizon proposes to replace nine (9) existing antennas on
the existing monopole with nine (9) replacement antennas at the same height as presently existing, replace
two (2) 6PS units on the existing equipment shelter with two (2) new GPS units, and install additional
equipment inside its existing equipment shelter. As such, we respectfully submit that the proposed
modification will not "substantially change the physical dimensions" of the existing monopole or base
station.
Morco\-er, the Telecommunications Act of 1996, codified at 47 United States Code § 332, as interpreted
by the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") in its Declaratory Ruling 09-99 and Order On
Reconsideration 10-144, requires that applications such as Verizon's be processed within 90 days.
We enclose the following in support Of tile proposed eligible facilities request:
I. Town of Southold Building Permit Application form detailing the eligible facilities request;
2. Owner's Authorization Affidavit;
3. Building Permit Application fee: Check of Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin LLP (Check No.
1 325) in the amount of $500.00:
RE, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
36 NORTH NEW YORE AVENUE
HUNTINGTON, NEW YORR 11743
TEEErxoNR: (631) 425-4100
FACSIMILE: (631) 425-4104
OF GOUNSEL
WILLIAM J. NIELSEN
July 25, 2012
By Hand
Mr. Michael Verity
Building Department
Town of Southold Annex Building
54375 Route 25
Southold, NY 11971
RE: New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon")
Proposal to modify existing telecommunications facility at
Premises: 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, New York
SCTM#: 1000 - 96 - 1 - 19.1
Dear Mr. Verity:
On behalf of Verizon, and pursuant to your office's request, we enclose, herewith, the following
documents:
1. Application for Certificate of Occupancy; and
2. Our firm's check number 1381 in the amount of $50.00, which amount represents the
required Certificate of Occupancy fee.
We respectfully request that our office be notified once the Building Permit is issued so that we
may pick up same from the Town. c
Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain ~ b4c)q
Very truly yours,
RE, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP
By:
ohm . Coughlin
JJC:mk
Enclosures
New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless
Proposal to modify existing facility at 21855 C.R. 48, Cutchogue
May 212012
Page 2 of 2
4. Two (2) counterparts of Antenna Site FCC RF Compliance Assessment and Report prepared by
Pinnacle Telecom Group and dated March 27, 2012, demonstrating the project's compliance with
the FCC's Maximum Permissible Exposure regulations;
5. "Iwo (2) counterparts of Structural Analysis Report with design drawings, prepared by GPD
Group, dated April 19, 2012, documenting the facility's structural compliance with local, state
and federal codes;
6. Copy of Verizon's FCC Licenses;
7. Copy of Deed;
8. Copy of Lease Supplement between Crown Atlantic Company LLC and New York SMSA
Limited Partnership, dated March 31, 1999;
9. Copy of Verizon's Certificates of Occupancy Nos. Z-24388 and Z-24389, both dated May 30.
1995;
10 Copy of Verizon's Planning Board Resolution, dated April 7, 1992 approving Amended Site Plan
Application;
I I. Copy of Verizon's Board of Appeals Resolution, dated December 5, 1991. together with copies
of Board of Appeals Decisions Nos. 4058 and 4062, both dated November 21, 1991.
12. Copy of property survey prepared by Arek Surveying Company, dated June 4, 2009; and
13. Four (4) sets of Construction Drawings with Site Plans and Elevations. prepared by ATP
Engineering, dated April 6, 2012.
We respectfully request that the instant proposal be processed in accordance with the above and that the
appropriate Permit be issued at this time. We respectfully request that our office be contacted when the
Permit is ready to be picked up. We can be reached at (631) 425-4100.
Very truly yours,
RE, NIELSEN, HUGER & COUGHLIN, LLP
BN:
hn ou hlin
JC:mk
Enclosures
Cc via e-mail w/o encls.: Ms. Heather Lanza, Planning Director
01/09/2014 18:45 FAX 10001/005
RE, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
36 North New York Avenue
Huntington, New York 11743
(631) 425-4100
Telecopier
(631) 425-4104
TELECOPY TO THE FOLLOWING NUMBER: 631-765-9502
TO: Ms. Connie Bunch
Town of Southold Building Department
RE; New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon")
Request for Extensions of Time relating to Building Permit Nos.:
¦ 37382 - Southold Police Station - 165 Peconic Lane, Peconic (75 - 5 - 14.1)
¦ 37383 - Arthur lunge property - 21855 C.R. 48, Cutchogue (96 - I -19.1)
¦ 37384 - Orient Fire District - 23300 Main Road, Orient (18 - 5 - 13.8)
FROM: Marisa Knoth
DATE; January 9, 2014
MESSAGE: Please see our attached correspondence and attachments thereto.
TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES 5 (Including Cover Page)
PLEASE NOTE
The information contained in this facsimile message is privileged and confidential and is intended only
for the use of the individual named above and others who have been specifically authorized to receive
such information. If the recipient is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this communication in error, or if any problems occur with transmission, please notify as immediately
by telephone at (631) 4254100. Thank you.
United States Code
United States Code
_Lj J TITLE 47 - TELEGRAPHS TELEPHONES AND RADIOTELEGRAPHS
CHAPTER 13 - PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM AUCTIONS
J SUBCHAPTER IV - SPECTRUM AUCTION AUTHORITY
47 U.S.C. 5 1455. Wireless facilities deployment
(a) Facility modifications
(1) In general - Notwithstanding section 704 of the Telecommunications
Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-104) or any other provision of law, a State or
local government may not deny, and shall approve, any eligible facilities
request for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station
that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower
or base station.
2) Eligible facilities request - For purposes of this subsection, the
term "eligible facilities request" means any request for modification of
an existing wireless tower or base station, that involves -
(A) collocation of new transmission equipment;
(B) removal of transmission equipment; or
(C) replacement of transmission equipment.
(3) Applicability of environmental laws - Nothing in paragraph (1)
shall be construed to relieve the Commission from the requirements of the
National Historic Preservation Act [16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.7 or the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 [42 U.S,C,,332.1 of seq.!.
(b) Federal easements and rights-of-way
(1) Grant - If an executive agency, a State, a political subdivision or
agency of a State, or a person, firm, or organization applies foe the
grant of an easement or eight-of-way to, in, over, or on a building or
other property owned by the Federal Government for the right to install,
construct, and maintain wireless service antenna structures and equipment
and backhaul transmission equipment, the executive agency having control
of the building or other property may grant to the applicant, on behalf of
the Federal Government, an easement or right-of-way to perform such
installation, construction, and maintenance.
(2) Application - The Administrator of General Services shall develop a
common form for applications for easements and rights-of- way under
paragraph (1) for all executive agencies that shall be used by applicants
with respect to the buildings or other property of each such agency.
13) fee
(A) In general - Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the
Administrator of General Services shall establish a fee for the grant of
an easement or right-of-way pursuant to paragraph (1) that is based on
direct cost recovery.
(e) Exceptions - The Administrator of General Services may establish
exceptions to the fee amount required under subparagraph (A)-
(i) in consideration of the public benefit provided by a grant of an
easement or right-of-way; and
(ii) in the interest of expanding wireless and bice[band coverage.
i4 Use of fees collected - Any fee amounts collected by an executive
agency pursuant to paragraph (3) may be made available, as provided in
appropriations Acts, to such agency to cover the costs of granting the
easement or right-of-way.
(c) Master contracts for wireless facility sitings
(1) In general - Notwithstanding section 704 of the Telecommunications
Act of 1996 or any other provision of law, and not later than 60 days
after February 22, 2012, the Administrator of General Services shall -
(A) develop 1 or more master contracts that shall govern the placement
of wireless service antenna structures on buildings and other property
owned by the Federal Government; and
(B) in developing the master contract or contracts, standardize the
treatment of the placement of wireless service antenna structures on
building rooftops or facades, the placement of wireless service antenna
equipment on rooftops or inside buildings, the technology used in
ronnection with wireless service antenna structures or equipment placed on
Federal buildings and other property, and any other key issues the
Administrator of General Services considers appropriate.
(2) Applicability - The master contract or contracts developed by the
Administrator of General Services under paragraph (1) shall apply to all
publicly accessible buildings and other property owned by the Federal
Government, unless the Administrator of General Services decides that
issues with respect to the siting of a wireless service antenna structure
on a specific building or other property warrant nonstandard treatment of
such building or other property.
(3) Application - The Administrator of General Services Shall de.,eLop o
common form or set of forms for wireless service antenna structure siting
applications under this subsection for all executive agencies that shall
be used by applicants with respect to the buildings and other property of
each such agency.
(d) Executive agency defined - In this section, the term "executive
agency" has the meaning given such term in section 102 of title 40.
( Pub.L. 112-96, title VI, Sec. 6409, Feb. 22, 2012, 126 Stat. 232. 1
REFERENCES IN TEXT
Section 7D4 of the Telecommunications Act of 195E, reterred to in
subsecs. (a)(1) and (c)(1), is section 704 of Pub.L. 104-104, which
amended section 332 of this title and enacted a provision set out as a
note under section 332 of this title.
The National Historic Preservation Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(3),
is Pub.L. 89-665, Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 915, which is classified
generally to subchapter It (Sec. 470 et seq.) of chapter lA of Title 16,
Conservation. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see
section 470(a) of this title and Tables.
The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, referred to in subset.
(a)(3), is Pub.L. 91-190, Jan. 1, 1970, 83 Star. 852, which is classified
generally to chapter 55 (Sec. 4321 at seg.) of Title 42, The Public Health
and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see
Short Title note set out under section 4321 of Title 42 and Tables.
Copyright p 2012 CCH Incorporated or its affiliates
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK : STATE OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------------------------------------X
In the Matter of the Application of New York SMSA Limited AUTHORIZATION
Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless OF OWNER
At the premises:
21855 County Road 48
North side of County Road 48, west of Cox Lane
Cutchogue, New York
Section 96, Block 1, Lot 19.1
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
STATE OF IIQ)
) SS.:
COUNTY OF
Arthur V. Junge, being duly sworn, deposes and says:
I am the owner in fee of the premises known as Section 96, Block 1, Lot 19.1 (the "Premises"
hereafter), and do hereby authorize New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless
('Verizon Wireless' hereafter), and its representatives to bring such applications for municipal
approvals as may be necessary for the upgrade/modification of its public utility wireless
telecommunications facility. As such, I willfully cooperate with Verizon Wireless and its agents in
obtaining any required Approvals.
By.
Sworn to before me this
day of 2012
E
E%ViaXPiRSION
,N1 ~ `~XG-vy-.prF/wl^~ ES
CO) 1 AWUST 21.
NOT ' Y PUBLIC = o'Z 2016 e
NER
COMMON DRIVEWAY DECLARATION
I ~
THIS INDENTURE made this day of +RO .Nkaly, 2003, by Chris Mohr,
residing st 1425 SAC0$5 Lft F- I &O11 ,iTft i-+0 !f Ny- 11q r? /I~11 f,
and Arthur Junge, residing at 4lq mou.1 }a>J HI LL kA , LyMA•n1 I N60A SLC
1 D3S YN~
New York, hereinafter referred to collectively as the "Declarants".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Declarants are the owners of hums in the Town of Southold situate along the
northerly aide of Route 48, Cutchogue said lands being bounded and described in Schedule A
(Joseph Schoensteim), and B (Arthur Junge), said schedules being annexed hereto and made a pan
hereof.
WHEREAS, Declarants have agreed to emit a common driveway for the purpose of
ingress and egress to the above-described parcels of the land and for the installation of utilities
and all other lawful purposes in favor of these parcels, so that where will be a common access to
serve both parcels; and
WHEREAS, Declarants desire to provide for such shared driveway access to and from
Colony Drive;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it declared as tbllows:
1. The lots described above shall have a common driveway access to and from Route 48
over that portion of land described in Schedule C, said schedule being annexed hereto and made a
part hereof. Such driveway shall replace any existing driveways, now wristing on the Mohr
property described in Schedule A annexed hereto. The new driveway shall be located upon the
Junge property along the property line contiguous to the Mohr property.
2. The use of the premises described in Schedule C shall be subject to the following
restrictions:
a. The lot owners shall have the joint, equal, and mutual right to use the private roadway
described in Schedule C for the purpose of ingress and egress and placement of utilities.
b. The terms "lot owner` or "lot owners" as used in this Declaration, shall be deemed to
include any hare, distributeea, successors, or assigns ofthe particular lot owner or lot owners.
I
Page I of4
lot owner and his/her heirs, distributem, successors, and assigns, all of the conditions, obligations,
i restrictions, and provisions of this Declaration.
d. The word 'maintenance, as used in this Declaration, shall be deemed to mean all costs
and expenses in connection with said private roadway, including the costs of sweeping,
resurfacing, regravelling, filling in of holes, and all those items necessary to make it convenient ~
and safe for the owners of the aforesaid lots to use the private roadway described in Schedule C.
e. After the initial installation of the driveway at the sole cost of lunge, or his successor
shall determine what maintenance or improvements shall be done on the road and the amount or
money to be expended therefor. The owners orthe lots shall be responsible for equal portions of
maintenance.
C All lot owners agree that the roadway shall always be maintained so as to be passable by
vehicles: both automobiles and tracks and this shall include prompt repair if any "potholes" or
similar defects in the road which cause the roadway to become substandard.
S. In the event either lot owner fail to pay their proportionate sham of maintenance
expense within seven (7) days of notification of charges, such unpaid monies may be collected
from the other lot owner. In this event, the lot owner having duly paid both their proportionate
shares of expenses and those of the defaulting lot owner shall be deemed the contractor as defined
in the New York Lien Law. The lot owner who has not paid Wier proportionate sham shall
subject his/her real property to the lines or the lot owner who has paid his/her share of
maintenance expanse. The lot owner who has paid their proportionate sham of expenses may also
commence an action against the defaulting lot owner, in a court of appropriate jurisdiction, in
order to recover the unpaid monies. In any action commenced against a defaulting lot owner,
there shag be a presumption that the maintenance work lbr which monies are owing was validly
authorbed by the other lot owner and was competently performed by the contractor who did the
work. A defaulting lot owner shall be liable nor all costs and expenses, including but not limited to
attorney's fees which are incurred by the other lot owner in recovering the defaulting lot owner's
unpaid share orexpenses.
h. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, each and every lot owner shall repair
at histher sole cost and expense any damage done to the roadway by construction traffic,
machinery, or other implements used in the construction of improvements on the particular lot
owners land. Any failure to make or pay for such repair may be treated by the other lot owner as
a default in the payment of maintenance expense, in accords= with subparagraph (g) above.
3. It is further agreed that
a, the driveway shall be installod at the sole cost and expense of J unge or his successor in
the interest in the property,
Page 2 of 4
b. the width of the driveway shall remain 12 feet and shall not be widened without the
written consent of Junge or his successor.
c. the driveway shall be in conformance with all requirements of the Town of Southold
but not be paved or otherwise improved with any type of impervious surface;
d. the location of the driveway shall not be changed without the consent of both parties
or their respective successors.
4. This declaration is binding upon all grantees, heirs, distributees, successors, or assigns of
any portion of lards described in Schedule A and B above.
5. This Common Driveway Declaration may not be revoked, rescinded, extinguished,
modified or amended without the express written permission of a majority plus one of the
Southold Town Planning Board or its legal wecessor, except that the provisions hereof which
relate solely to the snaking or, repair or improvement decisions or the allocation of expenses
among lot owners may be revoked or modified without such Board's approval.
6. Mohr makes no claim to have, at any time, any right, title, or interest in any part of the
lends of lunge as set forth in Schedule A other then to the driveway created by this agreement in
the area defined in Schedule C.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Dedarants have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the
day and year first above written.
is -JA .-A K A11
`'11
Arthur Junge Chris Mohr
STATE OF NEW YORK)
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)
On the day ofa 8hMA'r!A in the yew 2003 before me, the undersigned personally
appeared Arthur Ju known to me or proved to me on tho basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the individual(s) whose name(s) is (are) subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/shetthey executed the same in his/her/their capacity(tes), and that by
Page 3 of4
his/her/their Signature(s) e the instrument, the individual(!), or the person upon behalrof which
the individual(s) acted. , exe ecuted the Instrument. Veronica F. Cldone ,
Notary Public, State of New York
No: 52-4601406 otary Public
Qualified In Suffolk Courtly
Commission Expires Dec.31 f<
STATE OF NEW YORK)
) ss.:
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)
On the day o in the year 2003 before MC, the undersigned personally
appeared Chris Mohr personally eown to me or proved to me the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the individual(s) whose name(s) is (are) subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to the that he/sheAbey executed the same in his/her/their eapscity(ies), and that by
his4w their signature(s) on the instrument, the individual(s), or the person upon behalrof which
the individual(s) acted, executed the instrument.
Veronica to a o one ~
Notary 1 ~o Ic~1~ York 52-4 4 A
Dutdlf,ed In Suffolk Oou?ro( Public
Commission Expires Dec 31,
Page 4 of 4
I I li I II I Illl II III I I II I II II I IIII I lllil III II I II II I[I I II II
1111111 IIIII IIIII IIII IIII
SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK
RECORDS OFFICE
RECORDING PAGE
Type of Instrument: EASEMENT/DOP Recorded: 08/30/2001
Number of Pages: 4 At: 01:24:00 PM
TRANSFER TAX NUMBER: 01-04375 LIBER: D00012139
PAGE: 075
District: Section: Block: Lot:
1000 096.00 01.00 019.001
EXAMINED AND CHARGED AS FOLLOWS
Deed Amount: $0.00
Received the Following Fees For Above Instrument
Exempt Exempt
Page/Piling $12.00 NO Handling $5.00 NO
COE $5.00 NO TP-584 $0.00 NO
Notation $0.00 NO Cert.Copies $0.00 NO
RPT $15.00 NO BCTM $0.00 NO
Transfer tax $0.00 NO Comm.Pros $0.00 NO
Fees Paid $37.00
TRANSFER TAX NUMBER: 01-04375
THIS PAGE IS A PART OF THE INSTRUMENT
Edward P.Romaine
County Clerk, Suffolk County
• 1 1.. 2 1
Numbar of pages E.
TORRRNS '`l~• `~'I "e
Serial4 QF
SLFF;KL, CWUh Y
jv.' r
Certificate a " ,r
P C'S
Prim Clf. 0 BTU r; .(47.75
Dead I Mortgage instrument peed / Mfongago Tax Sump Recording / Piling Stamps
4 FEES
Page I Filing Fee Mortgage Amt. _
Ems'. I
Handling J I. Buic'Ibx
711-554 Z. Additional Tux '
Notation Sub Total _
EA-5217(County) Sub Total 17-RA-5217 (Slate) Or
_ Spec. /Add _
R.P.T.S.A. "Y TUT. I.f1'G. TAX
Comm. of Ed. 5 (W-- fry Dual Town,Dual County-
Held for Apportimrment
A?davit TmuferTax
Certified Copy Manslon'I'za
The pmporly covered by this mortgage is or
Reg. Copy will be improved by a one or two family
Sub rout dwelfingonly.
Other YPB__orNO
GRAND TOTAL .3~ If NO, see appropriale tae claum on page 0
-orlhis innmmcmt.
Real Property Tax Smvice Agmey Verifreatim 6 C oarniuslit lsr(mcervalianl Fund
D10. Sedim Black f.m Conalduration Amount
St #1000 096.00 01.00 OL9.001 C;PP "L'nx Dare S
Q improved
Ini' Vacant Land
7 Satistaaliuns/Discharges/Roleasea List Property Owners Mailing Addros TD
RECORD & RETURN TO:
'I'll
Verizon TD
501 North Ocean Avenue
Patchogue, New York 11772
Room105
Now. Title Company Information
Name
H
Suffolk Count Recording & Endorsement Page
This pagc. tbrrns part of the altx-W Easement V106723
mode by:
Arthur V. J mge ISPF.'CTI•YTYPL'OFINSTRUMENI'1
Rein Street
Orient. ff.. York MjY The prendses herein is dilated in
SUPI'OLICCOUNTY. NEW YOWL
TO In*x1owsuhip of Socthold
Verizon In the VILLAGIS
Dl North Ocean Avenue or I-IAMI.FTof Cutchogue
Patchogue. Nev York 1177.
Room 105
BUXL•S 511 RU 9 MUST BE TYPED OR PILIlQfF1) IN 1TLAC'K INK ONLY PR1UR TO RECORDING OR PILING.
(OVER)
Dear Taxpayer,
Your satixfar lion of taor(gage has been filed In nrv n1lirr. and I all) ellclos7ng (lie original copy for your
recurus.
It s por(inn 01'vour 111011thly Mortgage payment included your property taxes. yvu iv01 now need t(1
l;',olij.UVj your local ow Tax Iteceh rr sn thrrl yr a n~~ hg., III •d dinr[ly l0r all fuwre orouettyyy~
bills.
Local prupe.rly tace.s arr. payable. hvi(:e a year: on or br,rfnre.lanuan, 10"' and on or bclbre May 31
Failure to make payments In a tiuuly fashion could resell in n penalty.
Please contact your local Town Tax Receiver with any questions rogarding property tax
payment.
l a1) vlon Town Rerniver or,raxrv Illverhead 'town lteneh•er or Tres
200 LLIIEL SLUU]6C 11I41wAV ?.On NuwAl Arrnne..
Nnrth I.Intlenhnral, N.Y. 11767 Riverhead, N.Y. 11901
(MI) 057 3004 1347) 727.3200
l3rooLkurven Town Receiver of Taxm Shelter Island Town Itecelver of Taxes
250 Fast Main Street Shelter Island Town hall
port Jefferson. N.Y. 11777 Sheller island, N.Y, 11964
(6311473-0236 (631) 719-31.16
Euat HmupLun Tuwn likr.ivar of Taxes Sulitlltown'I'own 14MV4ver Olt inxea
300 Pantigo I'ltuxt 99 West Main Street
East Hampton. N.Y. 11937 Smlthlmvil, N.Y. 117HT
(6311324-2770 ("M I) :380 7610
Huntinglun Town Receiver of Taxes Soulhampton'rowu Rmulver of Taxes
100 Main Sirmt I It9 lfatupton Road
Huntington. N.Y. 11743 Southampton. N.Y. 11968
(631) 351-3217 (MI) 283-6514
Islip Town Berelver o('lltxes Southold Town Receiver of Tnxcs
40 Nnssau Avenue 53095 Main Stroel
Islip, N.Y. 11761 Soulhold, N.Y. 11971
(631) 224 5550 (A11) 765 180,1
Sinecroly, ~J
Edwurd P, kL)uutule
Suffolk Comity Clerk
dw
2/99
r..rnw:: uiav
ROW 1
'l V106721 ~~'y'/~/~'A
'I GRANT USEKENT, made thie~,{_ day ofJQ ; 20~,
~ u
6e twaon ,nn /
residing at l~(! !y) I t n( i P (1 lYor7 j ,
(hereinafter referred to as -Grantor") to VERIXON NEW YORK INC. (formerly
known as New York Telephone Company), a corporation of the State of New
York, having its principal office at 1095 Avenue of the Americas, New
York, Now York (hereinafter referred to as -Orontes-).
WHEREAS, the Grantor owns in foe a certain panel of land situated
B DIST. 0100, SEC. 096.00 BLK. 01.00, LOT. 019.001, in the County of
S••! , State of New York, as shown on EXHIBIT attached hereto
and hereby made pert of this grant.
NOW, THEREFORE, WITEESSM, i
FIRST, That for and in consideration of the sum on One Dollar
($1.00) in hand paid by the Grantee to Grantor, the receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged, the Grantor grants unto the Grantee, its successors
and assigns, the right, privilege and authority to construct, place,
operate, replace, remove, repair and maintain service lines, including
i buried cable, pedestale, conduits, manholes, poles and such urossarms,
guys, stubs, ancbore, cables, wires and fixtures as the Grantee may from
time to time damn necessary upon, ever, under and along the said land and
i the highways adjoining or upon said land, approximately as ahown on
Exhibit ' a , together with the right of ingress and egress to
exercise all of the rights herein granted and with the right to trim any
trees and routs along said lines, me reasonably necessary, to keep thin
said facilities free and clear from interference on said land and said
highways.
SECOND, The exclusive and permanent right-of-woy and movement above
described and heroin conveyed is intended to prohibit the longitudinal Or
parallel occupancy of said aaeement strip by others, including Grantor
and to prohibit surface or subsurface structures or othorwLos of others,
including Grantor, which might damage or interfere with the operation and
maintenance of Grantoa•o facilities without the prior written consent of
Grantee, but is not intended to prohibit crossing of maid easement strip
so long am such crossings do not interfere with or prohibit the full use
of the aaaement herein granted. Grantor agrees with the Grantee, on
behalf of himself, his successors and assigns, and as a covenant running
with the land, that the grad. existing at the time of execution of thin
grant of easement will remain undisturbed and unchanged.
THIRD, The Grantor hereby grants unto the Grantee, its successors
and assigns the right to permit the attachment of the communication and
electric service wires and facilities of other utility companies and to
convey to ouch other companion an interact in the rights granted under
this Grant.
VOORTa, It is a condition of this Grant that each corporation
receiving this Grant shall pay the cost of guarding adequately all
excavations made by that corporation under this Grant and pay the coat to
restore or repair any damage done by that corporation to the property of
the Grantor while placing, replacing, relocating, operating, repaLrLng,
maintaining, renewing or removing its facilities, and shall save harmleas
and indemnify the Grantor from Any injury to Its property, its employees
or the public which may at any time occur through the negligence of that
corporation.
Grantor has duly executed this grant the day and year first above
written.
6ALkrV
~u e ti L.B.
witness
Arthur V. lunge/ /
- L.B.
Witness Antionetto Fehie
~I
' I
V106733 ROW 2
II aTATR Or NEW YORK )
COUNTY O 6 oa )
On the day of lx the year C2 before m, the
u de Dig f~a~e J, personally appeared
personally known to m or proved to m on the basis of
s tiafactory vldenoe to bs the individual(e) whose nsme(s) is tars)
subscribed to the within Instrument and acknowledged to m that
hs/she/they executed the sass in his/her/their capacity, and that by
hie/her/their eignatum(s) on the instrument, the individual(s), or the
person upon behalf of which the individual(s) cted, executed the
instrumnt.
II Notary Public `
II
1 ~
II
II
(I
II
it i
V a Iwo
V106723
CSC CA(31N67 PLACE CAGLE.IQ
VECIZ,00 WaLESS
coouU1
U& 4 IL --1
3 b4'
°"V~iryl.:. O P.4ZI
O
GNFIr, r .r ri:(
F4u«
{I
21855
< i.
~ 1i
0 I-
~ ;1
~I
MAP OF: 2!855 Cou.17Y 2Lb 42, KEY
1000-096-00-01-00-D19-001 PROPOSED
LOCALITY: CuTCr4o&uE ~G~
TOWN OF: SourHocp UuDEC~@a..1D CAaLX-
000NTY OF: SUFFOLK
STATE OF:.NEW YORK EXHIBIT "A
6_0 c PLEASE RETURN TO: NEW VM TELEPNONE 00.
301 NO. OCEAN AVE
,•.1;1110:; Y.'Gddi : PATCHOSUX NX 11771
3~ Ae31~ ATT. RM SUPV.
:~-ea0yd p.anp3 RO[M
66 0~ bro ;ax.
03;i003C
• e 11519P~5'79 ~ ~ , . ~
RFM ~rtidf
~ 1JUj
AU6 14 ;•wJ
Inx i
ik5U i Nil K
YlON1111 r Enuu:I
tQuer OF iMp)Y~tJ /saM this F day of Um •e ^t1~, 1
..Mtww `t ,fl.trt._X.~L(/Ll d: corporatism with its principal
i ottlw mt [t/S~ss~ d4Q .C r.l 0110 {Mrroiilatbr
referred to an "ersawfin to M Yang 1fQ,p110gg G, 104111 a sorporstles of the
State of Iles Toth, having Its Principal Office At 1011 Avmsw of the America,
mew Vork. Now Verb (heretafter referred to se "arantes"). i i
so 9M1G MO the Orator eras In few a captain normal of land sltatad
Cosslderatlom,fa the Tows of Southold to Uv, Gateway of Suffolk, /tste of Now York, a oboes
an gmklbit "A", attembod bereto awl hereby ends part of this erect.
lwylr, TN9it/G11f, ailMg11g11vgt '
FINIft That for and In onsslderation of the sec of One ballet,
(11.00) In had paid by the Grates to Grantor the receipt of *blob In hereby
DIST. 1000 acknowledged the Grantor tracts Onto the Grates, Its mc"wrs am essia",
the right, Privllep and wtborlty to construct, plea, Operate, rplaw,
so". 091100 re - a, repair and maintain merviop lines, Including buried amble, Pedestals,
conduits, exaWas, Palos sod seek cro esara, guys. mtuhe, sabers, cables, j
1111. 0100 Mira sad fixtures as the Grectme ay tens ties to time deed necessary mine,
over, antler aced along the said tad ad the bighvye ndlotsdng Or NO" aid !
WT 10 lad, pproxiately an Obase an Rubiblt "A", together with the right of isgre" '
NW Ogres to exercise all of the rlgkts Yerele gratnd sad filth the right to
~rla?~~ ;-trim Gay trust cad roots along said items, an reesaaaby .wemenry, to keep the
7~ G 'aid cables and virus trim mad deer fro interference as aid 1rN and aid
hillways.
~tl " g moms TM exclusive and permanent right-of-wy and eaaaat
v....., Y 001 described NW Wsia eeareyod is latoaded to Prohibit the toogltudisal or j
9 parallel ocaepaway of said same t strip by others, including Orator mad to
prohibit surtsos or subsurface structures or otherwise of others, Including
Granter, which stebt dean& of Interfere with the operation end maintenance of i
Gteates¦ facilities without the prior written ooneest of Grant", but is at
latend.d to prohibit arousing of aid eamenset strip we long ms amok crossings
do sot leterfere with or prohibit the full use of she oamemeat hotels grated.
Grantor ytea with the Gratese, an behalf of himself, his wooesacn and
nations, awl an c covmaat testing with the lad, that the pads sainting at
the time of nuseties of this great of Garment will rralr undisturbed
unchanged. it in understood and Id. be- or that the above meted
condltioa we not intended to, nor do they restrict or prevent Grantor from i
'.planing y--ter, curbing parking late and landscaping.
THING& The Grantor hereby greats unto the grant". its successors
end anslga the right to Permit the atta A & of the communication wed
electric anise w1rom ad tacllltius ofy (het utility commits aM to answer '
to ancb other coapnalon an interest Ilr'f~e rights grated ceder ibis Great.
101111X1 It tp eandlkia of this Grant that Orates doll pay .
the poet of gs.rding wsywtely all oxoavatlaea tede by Orates wde? this
erect and pay the cast to restore or repair ay dnegu data by the Grant" to
the property of the Greater While Placing, rplacing, relocating, operating,
repairing, malatsicleg. removing or remevlme Its facilities, ad awl Bove
harelou and IrtI ify the Grater tram any lmjwp to its property, Its
employe" or the public which my at asp time oomsr tbavgh the segliguooe Of i
;'the grant".
10 01111111111 VIIOMD?, Grantor ban anted this Instrument be be duly i
eaawted ader sal the 61 and yes first time written.
thur Y Junge to j
a
xl Arthur V. Jun11O. Own r
Lar 24.3
- M/f P+eTXRN'TLZ -
RIOR Wk` OOP. COY- pFF
flBFCECFUEI `\gO\
If,IBTALLE9 TO ' LOO' R FROM MONOPOLE CENTER • 9
Y - 1 - : O LiQHT Fjsp7LlgN6
sN1EL.
1 ORT.O ADJACENT ERI1`` y Q PAWN GALCULATJM
- EXISTING BUILDING 4.000 S.F.'
LO1- ZOd [NFiRp.1E N'+LbY 4.051 PROPOSED RADIO EQUIPMENT BUILDING 112 % 26' 1 - 312 S.F.
F wff
j _ _ Y tK('AGe FPNOE - - I I' - - EXISTING BUILDING USE-' 1
/
F MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR'S BUSINESS 1.600 6.F 1
CATERER I.2W S.F
/ S eYfT3MG nPeE a uLOY II` REPAIR GARAGE I. am S.{
. .-•a\ Efia.w . I _ PRUNMANNEDOEQUIPMENT -rr~u•ELTER 312 S.F.
( f YELLAM. LIN43 - !7 - IGNELTER REQUIRES IRE bOUENT EWIPMENT
. . r
MAINTENANCE'VIST3. APPROXIMATELY VI9T
PER MONTH. I
PER MONTH. I
I F A+_.,Zee~Rp~'~'LiM1J~
1 T I 1 - PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS PER USE,
1 "ft. - { 4 _ DEL1NEAW .I - MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR'S BUSINESS - I SPACE/EMPLOYEE PLUS 2 SPACES -
14. - KY .t PARIfMG',GPACES NEL[, I CATERER I SPACE/ENPLGYEE PLUS 2 SPACES
1 - - \ I NN-DIEL TE0 VL f
1 l 'PARKING SRACEB _ I REPAIR GARAGE • 4 SPACES/BAY PLUS I SPACE/EMPLOYEE
IMII"X I OLOCR' / dIJ 1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES • GREATER OF I SPACE/EMPLOYEE OR
L R1 1 LOF A9./ S I I SPACE/500 S.F.
TS 4 N _ ( Ip REWIRED PARKING SPACES-
1 / MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR'S - 5 EMPLOYEES X I SPACE/EMPLOYEE • 5
r M4 I P' 14- NtrGG l$ Q F 2 SPACES p
CATERER, 2 EMPLOYEES X I SPACE/EMPLOYEE 2
%
y ( I 'N "'.MPJ I nc L" a 2 SPACES . 2
. ; ' eXrsrn6 etas.
N, REPAIR GARAGE, i I BAY X 4 SPACES/BAY - 4
. F I ry O 1 •P EMPLOYEES % I SPACE%EMPLOYEE- 2
R1141 ( i - 1 1 I7 j EQUIPMENT SHELTER- I I EMPLOYEE X I SPACE/EMR.OYEE . I
1 1
K' b~ 1, tv TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING SPIU 1E6 - 16
(t 4_ .
. s a l 1 P4141 S`-"+Ay F---5 ~ [ PARKING -SPACES PROVIDED STANDARD STALL '40' X 20' . IS
f -h PM'MMSwr -
PM'1rYFYAJ ( 1: PARKING SPACES PROVIDED HANOEMPED STALLS 12. 51 X 20' - 'B
W /T 5 '~1 TOTAL PARKING SPACES PeDNF~.S; - IR - -
our
~ ( / is ~`L^l.: l'
34•-mui.o:. - - ne' aPoltlNtR Tp III
nP•un LMrl+nl r MP.J j N
FGeerac Rem aVwlevcwo AP:Nf'`;J .
. 'If M4eetr _ TOW„ CS SO...,~0D9:D?~
JI-
PROPOSED &Qr ,1jl~(I PITH PARKING M AZ
3 -•zD [
SURVEY. INFORMATION BASED ON •MA0 OF - 1~ PLANT MATERIALS
'PRGPEFFEy SURVETED FOR ARTHUR V, JUNGE.
INC.' PREPARED BY RODERICK VAN TUYL. L. S. USE M. SCpRFIP IAN t'a11RA IINIE R13/II>Tr
NO. 26026 DATED 9/23180 AND LAST
AV Ik:[
REVISED 2/14/69 13 wIM P11-pRPOIM3 NE[ICYI IAMG PNE 3•-6'/e•P M' 4C.
NEAVIIIIII,
+Tri.@pTA R B PRMS M14M UFRIN1 PINE 6'-fi'/e,P p• O.C.
LOT y9 - BL K I
eRU" mj', wlMHUp RUPp rule u•-nve•e s' O.a
S. ~LTF E~ O 1-IE 48 4 N
°IrN.R uIIc..°TW"Ww°r) T.1 NEAYORK + MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
- - •NCIC, MAY BE iwL[,L Rrtx IPILE4 PUMESS, WLn K' BPRYCEI
LOT MEA - 45.589 S.F. . 1.04 AC.S -.3 M 4paiwlKG dl uNE A. VMR.,eRm or rLMxr wteRlrLE Ar uwLUEwrMrXw. CUTCHOGUE SITE
ZONE DATA LI LIGHT DoUBTRIAL SITE PLAN EXHIBIT
REQUIRED PROVIDED COUNTY ROUTE 48, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
LOT 5 SUFFOLK COUNTY. NEW YORK
40.000 SF 43. Y68:SF -
LO'T p•AID H 1991
FRONTEFYARD 50 752 "E DATE OCTOBER IB.
SIDE YARD 20 149• [ EmomSDS
BOTH SIDE YARD 45 ITO- - SCALE AS SNOMN
REM YARD TO 24M• KSw R~
• SETBACKS FOR PROPOSED NYNEX RADIO EQUIPMENT Q 11/19/91 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS GMG NO 92-0014
BUILDING
0 61i A 8 7- 7
' REV. No. GATE D2scRIPnoN RICHARD E L P: 9.1110.
SHEET I OF I
i
TAX LOT #17.5
N/0/F TOWN OF SOUTHOLD QQ
11 100.1 2.2'NW
N 23014100 E
F E C E
C A I N L I N STORAGE BIN 10.9'SW 10.
4.0'NW 17.7'SE
8.6'SE MONOPOLE
GRAS 5 " PETAL 1 STY
......165'
k FRAME
'O .~1..~..
T wl
r \ GRASS W Of g
z~ _ i y1 W t`
zli'
_ Zip/ GATE Z Boa ti
° APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
pp VERIZON EASEMENT GA
Q I (I (RECORD-EXIBIT "A" V105786) 9 3'SW
v 1 >
C'V ° a II. UNDERGROUND VERIZON
o WIRELESS CONDUIT M
I:
(RECORD-EXIBIT "A" VI06723) N
c~ I 00
z i i Z A S P H A L T P A R K I N G
TAX LOT #79.1 EDGE OF ASPHALT I z
II AREA: 13.1'SW3
n N I 10 45,589 Sq.F. I
rn < I n 1.0465 Acres I
I 30
< I
ASPHALT PARKING
--------ROOF OVER,14.85'SW`
105.15 I #22155
1 >
1 1 < I~ t10'CONCRETE FRAM
#21855 I 3 r
I
rf 1 nl w
L N
3 WW I '1 „j 1 srr I
I 1 v PETAL >
I
_ w I II (AUTO SHOP)
705.15' I
I I:? R E E\ -A-17 - N------- X 1-11 r Q
O ~I (i00F OVER---- J I4 Z. J f~ O
0
06 ° < Mr' 2 N
~ _ U
, Z O TAX LOT /20.1
iw Z o I I O <z a I* < _
r Z Z .I Y rn F 1l^C N/O/F CHRISTOPHER MOHR
CD) 3: W
In Ln
V
V/
(n -C 11A
w~ I 0 GRASS 3 <a S
Z w III ce G R A S S 285, .
z 11 I 3
ul ' (ACTUAL)
~ Iytl
iI WOOD CURB ° z7t750' (DEED)
LILCO z 115N
TILITY POLE t UTILITY POLE
#420 $421 CONCRETE C RU B
168.17
ELEC. CONDUIT S 25°52'30" W (MARK-OUT) MIDDLE 120' WIDE)ROAD
NOTES' (C.R.-48)
1. THE OFFSETS OR DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON, FROM THE PROPERTY LINES TO
THE STRUCTURES ARE FOR A SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND USE THEREFORE THEY (NORTH ROAD
ARE NOT INTENDED TO MONUMENT PROPERTY LINES OR TO GUIDE THE
ERECTION OF FENCES. ADDITIONAL STRUCTURES OR ANY OTHER IMPROVEMENTS.
2. DEPARTMENT CONSULT WITH THE HIGHWAY MODIFYING ANY W OR EXISTING CUREIS. WALKS OR ROADWAYS I'INT THE
STREET SHOWN HEREON.
3. SUBSURFACE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON WAS BASED ON VISUAL OBSERVATIONS,
VARIOUS CITY DEPARTMENTS. AND/OR PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES RECORDS,
AND/OR UTILITY MARKOUT. THIS SURVEYOR ACCEPTS NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR SURVEY (1F PIMPFRTY LOCATED AT.
ANY OF THIS DATA. - -
SUBSURFACE UTILITIES ARE NOT CERTIFIED AS TO THE ACCURACY AND/OR 5 C.R PRO CUTCHOGUE
COMPLETENESS.
4. ALL SUBSURFACE UTILITY LOCATION AND DEPTH SHOULD BE BUREAU, AND TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
LEGAL GRADES SHOULD B t3E VERIFIED WITH THE TOPOGRAPHICAL L BU BU
PREFERABLY IN TI WRITING BEFORE COMMENCING FINAL DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
IN FY THAT
SHOWN ON THISµSURVEY NATURAL
5. THIS S T AS N VI
WATER COURCES CERTIFY
THE PROPERTY A
6. REFER TO ARTICLE 36 OF THE GENERAL BUSINESS LAW AND THE PROVISIONS STATE OF NEW YORK
OF INDUSTRIAL CODE PART (RULE NO. 53) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION OR DISTRICT 1000, SECTION 96
DEMOLITION IS COMMENCED. THESE LAWS REQUIRE EACH EXCAVATOR TO GIVE BLOCK 1, LOT(S) 19.1
ADVANCE NOTICE TO ALL OPERATORS OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES OF HIS
INTENT TO PERFORM EXCAVATION OR DEMOLITION IN THE SPECIFIED AREAS.
7. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN U.S. STANDARD MEASUREMENTS.
8. EASEMENTS NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED.
REVISIONS DESCRIP710N oAIE FtE U t m
1. -04-0 ASC09112 ~Q..~~a D
y copies from the original of this survey marked with an PROPERTY SURVEY AS CO-
riginal of the lend surveyors embossed seal shall be w!
onsidered to be valid true copies. SURVD Q ~ti?,
TP9r r~-
nouthorized alteration or addition to a survey map bearing ARKADIUSZ JUSIEGA, P.L.S.
licensed land surveyor's seol is a violation of section 7209.
ub-dmsioo 2, of the New York State Education Law. ..L.
ertification indicated hereon signify that this survey was
repored in accordance with the existing Code of Practice AREK SURVEYING COMPANY L~ ~SDrJU n C J~
or Land Surveys adopted by the New York Stale Association Scale: CO 7
f Professional Land Surveyors. Said certifications shall run Parkway 1_ 30'-
Ny to the person for whom the survey is prepared, and an 58 East Beverly NY Parkway Job No- Ofd
is beholf to the title company, governmentat agency and Volley Stream, - 11580 ending institution listed hereon. and to l assignees of the www.aseny.net ASC_09112 Ill DESIGN GROUP, Inc.
ending institution. Certifications Subsea are not transferable to TEL: 516 792-6676
dditional institutions or Subsequent owner. '
PINNACE TELECOM GROUP
Professional and Technical Services
rd,,~cowmag
ANTENNA SITE FCC RF COMPLIANCE
ASSESSMENT ANd REPORT
PREPAREd FOR
NEW YORK SMSA LIMITEd PARTNERShip
d/b/A VERIZON WIRELESS
"CUTChOqUE #274" SITE
21$55 COUNTRY ROAd EAST
CUTCNOCUE, NY
MARCh 27, 2012
14 RidGEdAIE Avenue - SuiTE 209 0 CedAR Knolls, NJ 07927 0 973-451-1630
i~
CONTENTS
INTROdUCTION ANd SUMMARY 3
ANTENNA ANd TRANSMISSION DATA S
COMPLIANCE ANALYSIS 8
COMPLIANCE CONCIUSION 13
CERTIFICATION 14
APPENdIX A. BACICGROUNd ON ThE FCC MPE LIMIT
APPENdIX B. SUMMARY OF EXPERT QUALIFICATIONS
2
INTROdUCTION ANd SUMMARY
At the request of New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless
("Verizon Wireless"), Pinnacle Telecom Group has performed an independent
expert assessment of radiofrequency (RF) levels and related FCC compliance for
the modification of an existing wireless base station antenna operation on an
existing monopole at 21855 Country Road East, Cutchogue, NY. Verizon
Wireless refers to the site as "Cutchogue # 274" and the antenna modifications
are proposed so Verizon Wireless can effectively operate under its licensed
frequencies including 700 MHz, 850 MHz, and 1900 MHz.
The FCC requires wireless system operators to perform an assessment of
potential human exposure to radiofrequency (RF) fields emanating from all the
transmitting antennas at a site whenever antenna operations are added or
modified, and to ensure compliance with the Maximum Permissible Exposure
(MPE) limit in the FCC regulations. In this case, the monopole supports other
existing wireless antenna operations by, Sprint-Nextel, T-Mobile, AT&T and
MetroPCS - the RF effects of which will be included in this compliance
assessment.
This report describes a mathematical analysis of compliance with the FCC MPE
limit for safe continuous exposure of the general public. The RF effects of the
antennas are calculated using a standard FCC formula - and the analysis is
designed to conservatively overstate the RF levels that actually occur from the
antennas. In that way, as long as the results indicate RF levels below the MPE
limit, we can have great confidence the compliance requirement is satisfied.
The results of a compliance assessment can be explained in layman's terms by
describing the calculated RF levels as simple percentages of the FCC MPE limit.
If the reference for that limit is 100 percent, then calculated RF levels higher than
100 percent indicate the MPE limit is exceeded, while calculated RF levels
consistently lower than 100 percent serve as a clear and sufficient demonstration
of compliance with the MPE limit. We will also describe the overall worst-case
calculated result via the "plain-English" equivalent "times-below-the-limit factor".
3
The result of the FCC RF compliance assessment in this case is as follows:
? The conservatively calculated maximum RF level from the combination of
the Verizon Wireless antenna operations, as modified, along with all the
other antenna operations at the site, is 1.5621 percent of the FCC MPE
limit - well below the 100-percent reference for compliance. In other
words, even with the significant degree of conservatism incorporated in
the analysis, the worst-case calculated RF level is still more than 64 times
below the FCC limit established as safe for continuous human exposure
to the RF emissions from antennas.
? The results of the calculations provide a clear demonstration that the RF
levels from the combination of proposed and existing antenna operations
at the site satisfy the applicable criteria for controlling potential human
exposure to RF fields, and the RF levels will be in clear compliance with
the FCC regulations and limit concerning RF safety. Moreover, because
of the conservative methodology and incorporated assumptions, RF
levels actually caused by the antennas will be even less significant than
the calculation results here indicate.
The remainder of this report provides the following:
? relevant technical data on the Verizon Wireless antenna operations as
modified, along with data on the other existing antenna operations at the
site;
? a description of the applicable FCC mathematical model for assessing
MPE compliance, and application of the relevant technical data to that
model; and
? the results of the analysis, and the compliance conclusion for the site.
In addition, Appendix A provides background on the FCC MPE limit, along with a
list of FCC references on compliance, and Appendix B summarizes the expert
qualifications of the author of this report.
4
ANTENNA ANd TRANSMISSION DATA
The table below provides the key compliance-related data for the Verizon
Wireless antenna operations, as proposed to be modified, at the site.
r
General Data
Frequency Bands 700 MHz, 850 MHz and 1900 MHz
Service Coverage Type Sectorized
Antenna Type Directional Panel
Antenna Centerline Height AGL 105 ft. 7 in 1
700 MHz Antenna Data 011
v a ...e
Antenna Model Antel 70090/4CF
Antenna Maximum Gain 13.1 dBi
RF Channels per Sector 1
Transmitter Power / RF Channel 40 watts
E
RR US
850 MHz Antenna Data
:3x ; L d.ix II -M--""HR, Mdfflio l.
'gF 'p~ ~ ~ 4 r.5 ry , . y-t' E R "qi
s.• ..n. '...u.. ...v
Antenna Model Ant el 70090/4CF
Antenna Maximum Gain 13.1 dBi
RF Channels per Sector 8
Transmitter Power / RF Channel 20 watts
d
1900 MHz Antenna Data 4
Antenna Model Antel 171090/8CF
Antenna Maximum Gain 16.6 dBi
RF Channels per Sector 4
Transmitter Power / RF Channel 16 watts M~gg _::.3._.. .m.:.
Note that in the analysis, we will conservatively ignore the power-attenuation
effects associated with the antenna cabling ("antenna line loss".)
The antenna vertical-plane radiation pattern is used in the calculations of RF
levels at ground level around a site. Figures 1 through 3 that follow show the
vertical-plane radiation patterns of the antenna model proposed by Verizon
Wireless. Note that in this type of diagram, the antenna is effectively pointed at
the three o'clock position (the horizon) and the relative strength of the pattern at
different angles is described using decibel units.
5
I
~I
Figure 1. Antel BXA 70090/4CF Antenna - 700 MHz Vertical-plane Pattern
I
0 deg
-{l- horizon
1
I
5 dB / dMsion
I
Figure 2. Antel 7009014CF Antenna - 850 MHz Vertical-plane Pattern
0 deg
horizon
i
5 dB / dMsion
it
6
Figure 3. BXA 171090/8CF Antenna -1900 MHz Vertical-plane Pattern
I
i
0 deg
horizon
i
5 dB /division
As noted at the outset, there are other antenna operations at the site that we
need to include in the compliance assessment, each of which involves directional
panel antennas arranged for sectorized wireless service coverage. In the
analysis for each of the wireless carriers, we will conservatively assume
operation with maximum channel capacity and at maximum transmitter power in
each of their respective FCC-licensed wireless frequency bands.
Sprint-Nextel is licensed to operate in both the 851 and 1900 MHz frequency
bands. In the 851 MHz band, Sprint-Nextel uses as many as 12 RF channels per
antenna sector and a maximum antenna input power of six watts. In the 1900
MHz band, Sprint-Nextel uses as many as six RF channels per antenna sector,
with a maximum of 16 watts of transmitter power per channel.
T-Mobile also known as Omnipoint) is licensed to operate in the 1900 MHz and
2100 MHz frequency bands. In the 1900 MHz band, T-Mobile uses a maximum
of eight RF channels in each antenna sector, with a maximum transmitter power
of 20 watts per channel. In the 2100 MHz band, T-Mobile uses two channels per
sector, with a maximum of 40 watts of transmitter power per channel.
I
7
AT&T is licensed to operate in the 700, 850 and 1900 MHz frequency bands. In
the 700 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as four RF channels per antenna sector
and a maximum transmitter power of 40 watts. In the 850 MHz band, AT&T uses
as many as eight RF channels per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter
power of 20 watts. In the 1900 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as four RF
channels per antenna sector, with a maximum of 16 watts of transmitter power
per channel.
MetroPCS is licensed to operate in the 2100 MHz frequency band, using as
many as three RF channels per antenna sector with a maximum transmitter
power of 24 watts per channel, and using one RF channel per antenna sector
with a maximum transmitter power of 60 watts.
COMPHANCE ANALYSIS
FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin 65 ("OET Bulletin 65)
provides guidelines for mathematical models to calculate the RF levels at various
points around transmitting antennas. At street-level around an antenna site (in
what is called the "far field" of the antennas), the RF levels are directly
proportional to the total antenna input power and the relative antenna gain in the
downward direction of interest - and the levels are otherwise inversely
proportional to the square of the straight-line distance to the antenna.
Conservative calculations also assume the potential RF exposure is enhanced by
reflection of the RF energy from the ground. Our calculations will assume a
100% "perfect" reflection, the worst-case approach.
The formula for street-level RF compliance calculations for any given wireless
antenna operation is as follows:
MPE% _ (100 * TxPower * 10 (Gmax-Vdisc/10) * 4) MPE * 471 * R2
)
where
MPE% = RF level, expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit
applicable to continuous exposure of the general public
8
100 = factor to convert the raw result to a percentage
TxPower = maximum net power into antenna sector, in milliwatts, a
function of the number of channels per sector, the
transmitter power per channel, and line loss
10 (Gmax-vd scno) = numeric equivalent of the relative antenna gain in the
downward direction of interest, referenced to any applied
antenna mechanical downtilt; data on the antenna
vertical-plane pattern is taken from manufacturer
specifications
4 = factor to account for a 100-percent-efficient ground
reflection, and the squared relationship between RF field
strength and power density (22 = 4)
MPE = FCC general population MPE limit
R = straight-line distance from the RF source to the point of
interest, centimeters
The MPE% calculations are performed out to a distance of 500 feet from the
facility to points 6.5 feet (approximately two meters, the FCC-recommended
standing height) off the ground, as illustrated in Figure 4 below.
antenna
height
from
antenna
bottom to
6.5'
above
ground
level
0 500
Ground Distance D from the site
Figure 4. MPE% Calculation Geometry
9
i
It is popularly understood that the farther away one is from an antenna, the lower
the RF level - which is generally but not universally correct. The results of
MPE% calculations fairly close to the site will reflect the variations in the vertical-
plane antenna pattern as well as the variation in straight-line distance to the
antennas. Therefore, RF levels may actually increase slightly with increasing
distance within the range of zero to 500 feet from the site. As the distance
approaches 500 feet and beyond, though, the antenna pattern factor becomes
less significant, the RF levels become primarily distance-controlled, and as a
result the RF levels generally decrease with increasing distance, and are well
understood to be in compliance.
FCC compliance for a collocated antenna site is assessed in the following
manner. At each distance point along the ground, an MPE% calculation is made
for each antenna operation, and the sum of the individual MPE% contributions at
each point is compared to 100 percent, the normalized reference for compliance
with the MPE limit. We refer to the sum of the individual MPE% contributions as
"total MPE%", and any calculated total MPE% result exceeding 100 percent is,
by definition, higher than the FCC limit and represents non-compliance and a
need to mitigate the potential exposure. If all results are consistently below 100
percent, on the other hand, that set of results serves as a clear and sufficient
demonstration of compliance with the MPE limit.
The following conservative methodology and assumptions are incorporated into
the MPE% calculations on a general basis:
1. The antennas are assumed to be operating continuously at maximum
power, and at maximum channel capacity. In addition, the effects of
antenna line loss are ignored wherever possible.
2. The power-attenuation effects of shadowing or other obstructions to the
line-of-sight path from the antenna to the point of interest are ignored.
3. The calculations intentionally minimize the distance factor (R) by
assuming a 6'6" human and performing the calculations from the bottom
(rather than the centerline) of each operator's lowest-mounted antenna,
as applicable.
10
i
4. The potential RF exposure at ground level is assumed to be 100-percent
enhanced (increased) via a "perfect" field reflection from the intervening
ground.
The net result of these assumptions is to significantly overstate the calculated RF
exposure levels relative to the levels that will actually occur - and the purpose of
this conservatism is to allow very "safe-side" conclusions about compliance.
The table on the next page provides the results of the MPE% calculations for
each operator, with the worst-case result highlighted in bold in the last column.
11
Ground Verizon Verizon Verizon Sprint-
Distance Wireless Wireless Wireless Nextel MPE% T-Mobile MPE % MPE% S Total AT&T M
PE% MPE%
700 MHz 850 MHz 1900 MHz °
~ft) MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE /o
0 0.0016 0.0409 0.1064 0.0438 0.0015 0.0499 0.0105 0.2546
20 0.0037 0.0103 0.0587 0.1507 0.0334 0.1620 0.0021 0.4209
40 0.0070 0.0277 0.0007 0.0818 0.0334 0.1604 0.0562 0.3672
60 0.0264 0.1318 0.0070 0.1080 0.0736 0.1836 0.2372 0.7676
80 0.0168 0.0860 0.0186 0.0795 0.1089 0.6024 0.0443 0.9565
100 0.0023 0.0018 0.0047 0.2148 0.1275 1.0282 0.0520 1.4313
120 0.0387 0.0991 0.0240 0.4101 0.0367 0.3339 0.0635 1.0060
140 0.0816 0.2690 0.0058 0.4241 0.0463 0.1071 0.0364 0.9703
160 0.0999 0.3613 0.0010 0.2879 0.0033 0.4010 0.0359 1.1903
180 0.0960 0.3472 0.0104 0.1207 0.1467 0.8096 0.0315 1.5621
200 0.0708 0.2618 0.0058 0.1027 0.1392 0.7022 0.0214 1.3039
220 0.0438 01620 0.0013 0.0893 0.0754 0.3880 0.0406 0.8004
240 0.0222 0.0823 0.0001 0.0614 0.0571 0.2028 0.0517 0.4776
260 0.0131 0.0495 0.0002 0.0573 0.0779 0.0939 0.0397 0.3316
280 0.0091 0.0337 0.0001 0.0793 0.1175 0.0784 0.0155 0.3336
300 0.0122 0.0411 0.0047 0.1333 0.1455 0.1422 0.0143 0.4933
320 0.0188 0.0635 0.0095 0.2033 0.1345 0.2818 0.0225 0.7339
340 0.0286 0.0964 0.0144 0.2723 0.1197 0.2505 0.0334 0.8153
360 0.0257 0.0867 0.0130 0.2440 0.0758 0.4143 0.0398 0.8993
380 0.0344 0.1186 0.0234 0.2966 0.0682 0.3729 0.0381 0.9522
400 0.0483 0.1668 0.0274 0.2686 0.0289 0.5680 0.0346 1.1426
420 0.0594 0.2099 0.0261 0.2944 0.0263 0.5163 0.0276 1.1600
440 0.0544 0.1921 0.0239 0.2689 0.0380 0.7424 0.0192 1.3389
460 0.0674 0.2326 0.0200 0.2849 0.0348 0.6803 0.0177 1.3377
480 0.0621 0.2144 0.0185 0.2621 0.0320 0.6258 0.0122 1.2271
500 0.0723 0.2553 0.0078 0.2420 0.0295 0.5775 0.0112 1.1956
12
As indicated, even with the significant degree of conservatism built into the
calculations, the maximum calculated RF level is 1.5621 percent of the FCC
MPE limit -well below the 100-percent reference for compliance. A graph of the
overall calculation results, provided below, probably provides a clearer visual
illustration of the relative insignificance of the calculated RF levels. The line
representing the calculated total MPE% results rises only slightly above the
graph's zero baseline, and shows an obviously clear and consistent margin to the
FCC MPE limit.
COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Normalized FCC MPE Limit Total MPE% Results
120
W 100
IL
2 80
CL
0
a 60
c
m
O 40
w
0
e 20-
0
0 100 200 300 400 500
Distance (ft)
COMpIIANCE CONCLUSION
According to the FCC, the MPE limit has been constructed in such a manner that
continuous human exposure to RF emissions up to and including 100 percent of
the MPE limit is acceptable and safe. The analysis in this case shows that the
maximum calculated RF level from the combination of the Verizon Wireless
antenna operations, as modified, along with the other existing antenna
operations at the site, is 1.5621 percent of the FCC MPE limit. In other words,
the worst-case calculated RF level from the combination of antenna operations is
more than 64 times below the limit established as safe for continuous human
exposure to the RF em issions from antennas.
13
The results of the calculations provide a clear demonstration of compliance with
the FCC MPE limit. Moreover, because of the conservative calculation
methodology and operational assumptions we applied in the analysis, RF levels
actually caused by the antennas will be even less significant than the calculation
results here indicate.
CERTIFICATION
It is the policy of Pinnacle Telecom Group that all FCC RF compliance
assessments are reviewed, approved, and signed by the firm's Chief Technical
Officer, who certifies as follows:
1. I have read and fully understand the FCC regulations concerning RF safety
and the control of human exposure to RF fields (47 CFR 1.1301 et seq).
2. To the best of my knowledge, the statements and information disclosed in
this report are true, complete and accurate.
3. The analysis of site RF compliance provided herein is consistent with the
applicable FCC regulations, additional guidelines issued by the FCC, and
industry practice.
4. The new Verizon Wireless antennas, as detailed herein, like the original
antennas, will not produce more radiation which will cause them to not be in
compliance with the FCC regulations. Moreover, the combined RF effects
from the antenna operations at this site are in compliance with the FCC
regulations and limit concerning potential RF exposure.
AV441*4 3/27/12
Danie ollins Date
Chief lftofinical
14
ApPENdIX A. BACkGROUNd ON TILE FCC MPE LIMIT
FCC Rules and Regulations
As directed by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the FCC has established
limits for maximum continuous human exposure to RF fields.
The FCC maximum permissible exposure (MPE) limits represent the consensus
of federal agencies and independent experts responsible for RF safety matters.
Those agencies include the National Council on Radiation Protection and
Measurements (NCRP), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the
American National Standards Institute (ANSI), the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In formulating its
guidelines, the FCC also considered input from the public and technical
community - notably the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).
The FCC's RF exposure guidelines are incorporated in Section 1.301 et seq of its
Rules and Regulations (47 CFR 1.1301-1.1310). Those guidelines specify MPE
limits for both occupational and general population exposure.
The specified continuous exposure MPE limits are based on known variation of
human body susceptibility in different frequency ranges, and a Specific
Absorption Rate (SAR) of 4 watts per kilogram, which is universally considered to
accurately represent human capacity to dissipate incident RF energy (in the form
of heat). The occupational MPE guidelines incorporate a safety factor of 10 or
greater with respect to RF levels known to represent a health hazard, and an
additional safety factor of five is applied to the MPE limits for general population
exposure. Thus, the general population MPE limit has a built-in safety factor of
more than 50. The limits were constructed to appropriately protect humans of
both sexes and all ages and sizes and under all conditions - and continuous
exposure at levels equal to or below the applicable MPE limits is considered to
result in no adverse health effects or even health risk.
The reason for two tiers of MPE limits is based on an understanding and
assumption that members of the general public are unlikely to have had
appropriate RF safety training and may not be aware of the exposures they
receive; occupational exposure in controlled environments, on the other hand, is
assumed to involve individuals who have had such training, are aware of the
exposures, and know how to maintain a safe personal work environment.
The FCC's RF exposure limits are expressed in two equivalent forms, using
alternative units of field strength (expressed in volts per meter, or V/m), and
power density (expressed in milliwatts per square centimeter, or mW/cm2). The
table on the next page lists the FCC limits for both occupational and general
population exposures, using the mW/cm2 reference, for the different radio
frequency ranges.
15
Frequency Range (F) Occupational Exposure General Public Exposure
(MHz) ( mW/cmz) (mW/cmz)
I
0.3-1.34 100 100
1.34-3.0 100 180 / F2
3.0 - 30 900 / F2 180 / F2
30 - 300 1.0 0.2
300 - 1,500 F / 300 F / 1500
1,500 - 100,000 5.0 1.0
The diagram below provides a graphical illustration of both the FCC's
occupational and general population MPE limits.
Power Density
(mW/cm2)
100 Occupational
General Public
5.0
1.0
0.2
O.3 1.34 31.0 30 300 1500 100,000
Frequency (MHz)
Because the FCC's WE limits are frequency-shaped, the exact MPE limits
applicable to the instant situation depend on the frequency range used by the
systems of interest.
16
The most appropriate method of determining RF compliance is to calculate the
RF power density attributable to a particular system and compare that to the
MPE limit applicable to the operating frequency in question. The result is usually
expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit.
For potential exposure from multiple systems, the respective percentages of the
MPE limits are added, and the total percentage compared to 100 (percent of the
limit). If the result is less than 100, the total exposure is in compliance; if it is
more than 100, exposure mitigation measures are necessary to achieve
compliance.
Note that the FCC "categorically excludes" certain types of antenna facilities from
the routine requirement to specifically (i.e., mathematically) demonstrate
compliance with the MPE limit. Among those types of facilities are cellular
antennas mounted on any type of tower, when the bottoms of the antennas are
more than 10 meters (c. 32.8 feet) above ground. The basis for the categorical
exclusion, according to the FCC, is the understanding that because of the low
power and the directionality of the antennas, such facilities - individually and
collectively - are well understood to have no significant effect on the human
environment. As a result, the FCC automatically deems such facilities to be in
compliance.
FCC References on Compliance
47 CFR, FCC Rules and Regulations, Part 1 (Practice and Procedure), Section
1.1310 (Radiofrequency radiation exposure limits).
FCC Second Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (FCC 97-303), In the Matter of Procedures for Reviewing Requests
for Relief From State and Local Regulations Pursuant to Section 332(c)(7)(B)(v)
of the Communications Act of 1934 (WT Docket 97-192), Guidelines for
Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation (ET Docket
93-62), and Petition for Rulemaking of the Cellular Telecommunications Industry
Association Concerning Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Preempt
State and Local Regulation of Commercial Mobile Radio Service Transmitting
Facilities, released August 25, 1997.
FCC First Memorandum Opinion and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of
Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation,
released December 24, 1996.
FCC Report and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of Guidelines for
Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, released
August 1, 1996.
FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, "Evaluating
Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency
Electromagnetic Fields", Edition 97-01, August 1997.
17
APPENdIX B. SUMMARY OF EXPERT QUALIFICATIONS
Daniel J. Collins, Chief Technical Officer, Pinnacle Telecom Group, LLC
Synopsis • 39 years of experience in all aspects of wireless system
engineering, related regulation, and RF exposure
• Has performed or led RF exposure compliance assessments
on more than 14,000 antenna sites since the new FCC rules
went into effect in 1997
• Has provided testimony as an RF compliance expert more
than 1,300 times since 1997
• Accepted as an expert in New York, New Jersey,
Connecticut, Pennsylvania and more than 40 other states,
as well as b the FCC
Education • B.E.E., City College of New York (Sch. Of Eng.), 1971
• M.B.A., 1982, Fairleigh Dickinson University, 1982
• Bronx High School of Science, 1966
Current Responsibilities: . Leads all PTG staff work involving RF safety and FCC
compliance, microwave and satellite system engineering,
and consulting on wireless technology and regulation
Prior Experience: • Edwards & Kelcey, VP - RF Engineering and Chief
Information Technology Officer, 1996-99
• Bellcore, Executive Director- Regulation and Public Policy,
1983-96
• AT&T (Corp. HQ), Director- Spectrum Management Policy
and Practice, 1977-83
• AT&T Long Lines, Group Supervisor- Microwave Radio
System Design, 1972-77
Specific RF Safety/ • Involved in RF exposure matters since 1972
Compliance Experience: • Have had lead corporate responsibility for RF safety and
compliance at AT&T, Bellcore, Edwards & Kelcey, and PTG
• While at AT&T, helped develop the mathematical models
later adopted by the FCC for predicting RF exposure
Have been relied on for compliance by all major wireless
carriers, as well as by the federal government, several state
and local governments, equipment manufacturers, system
integrators, and other consulting / engineering firms
Other Background: • Author, Microwave System Engineering (AT&T, 1974)
• Co-author and executive editor, A Guide to New
Technologies and Services (Bellcore, 1993)
• National Spectrum Managers Association (NSMA) - former
three-term President and Chairman of the Board of
Directors; was founding member, twice-elected Vice
President, a long-time member of the Board of Directors,
and was named an NSMA Fellow in 1991
• Listed in Who's Who in the Media and Communication and
International Who's Who in Information Technology
• Published more than 35 articles in indust ma azines
18
I 0
Date: Ae,2012 GPD
GROUP.
Greg Guzzle GPD Group
Crown Castle 520 South Main St.; Suite 2531
2000 Corporate Drive Akron, OH 44311
Canonsburg, PA 15317 (330) 572-2137
(724) 416-2620 jcheronisftlAaroup.com
Subject: Structural Analysis Report
Carrier Designation: Verizon Wireless Co-Locate
Carrier Site Number: 274
Carrier Site Name: Cutchogue
Crown Castle Designation: Crown Castle BU Number: 806579
Crown Castle Site Name: NY Cutchogue
Crown Castle JDE Job Number: 183351
Crown Castle Work Order Number: 482571
Crown Castle Application Number: 145544 Rev. 2
Engineering Firm Designation: GPD Group Project Number: 2012775.806579.01
Site Data: 21855 Country Rd., Cutchogue, NY 11935, Suffolk County
Latitude 41° V46.57", Longitude -72° 29'50.29"
100 Foot - Modified EEI Monopole Tower wl 8.5' Extension
Dear Greg Guzzie,
GPD Group is pleased to submit this "Structural Analysis Report" to determine the structural integrity of the
above mentioned tower. This analysis has been performed in accordance with the Crown Castle Structural
'Statement of Work' and the terms of Crown Castle Purchase Order Number 458910, in accordance with
application 145544, revision 2.
The purpose of the analysis is to determine acceptability of the tower stress level. Based on our analysis we
have determined the tower stress level for the structure and foundation, under the following load case, to be:
LC7: Existing + Reserved + Proposed Equipment Sufficient Capacity
Note: See Table I and Table II for the proposed and existing/reserved loading, respectively.
The analysis has been performed in accordance with the Q IA-222-G ndard and all local code requirements
based upon a wind speed of 120 mph 3-second gust, exposure ca egory C with topographic category 1 and
crest height of 0 feet.
We at GPD Group appreciate the opportunity of providing our continuing professional services to you and
Crown Castle. If you have any questions or need further assistance on this or any other projects please give us
a call.
Respectfully submitted by:
"k `WAinw-IT IS A 1/IOLAION dF LAIN FOR AM
/y~ r p r PERSON 10 ALTER THIS _;OC&ENT UNLESS HE IS
ACTING UNDER THE 11T 710A OF A LICENSED
avid B. ranger, P.E. f~ pROFESSIONAI AIG'NFFt
New York* 071387-1 `cox ~y1V,s,-A oat
Fes, III
520 South Main Street. Suite 2531 . Akron, Ohio 44311. 330-572-2100. Fax 330-572-2101 . www.GPDGroup.com
Glaus Pyle Schomer Burns and DeHaven, Inc. Akron . Atlanta . Cleveland . Columbus . Indianapolis. Louisville. Marion . Phoenix. Seattle. Youngstown
Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012
100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/ 8.5' Extension Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579
Project Number 2012775.806579.01, Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1) INTRODUCTION
2) ANALYSIS CRITERIA
Table 1 - Proposed Antenna and Cable Information
Table 2 - Existing and Reserved Antenna and Cable Information
Table 3 - Design Antenna and Cable Information
3) ANALYSIS PROCEDURE
Table 4 - Documents Provided
3.1) Analysis Method
3.2) Assumptions
4) ANALYSIS RESULTS
Table 5 - Section Capacity (Summary)
Table 6 - Tower Components vs. Capacity
4.1) Recommendations
5) DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES
6) APPENDIX A
tnxTower Output
7) APPENDIX B
Base Level Drawing
8) APPENDIX C
Additional Calculations
tnxTower Report - version 6.0.4.0
Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012
100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/ 8.5' Extension Structural Analysis CC/ BU No 806579
Project Number 2012775.806579.01, Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 3
1) INTRODUCTION
The existing monopole has 12 sides and is evenly tapered from 36" (flat-flat) at the base to 14.5" (flat-flat) at the
top. It has three major sections, connected with slip joints. The tower is painted white and has no tower
lighting.
This tower is a 108.5 ft Monopole tower designed by EEI in August of 1991. The tower was originally designed
for a wind speed of 80 mph per EIA-222-D.
Modifications designed by PJF (Job 41704-152, dated 11/30/05) have been installed and were considered in
the analysis. They consisted of installing modification plates to the pole shaft and adding anchor rods to the
base plate.
Modifications designed by GPD (Project 2010111.14 Rev. C, dated 8/18/10) have also been installed and
were considered in this analysis. They consist of installing modification channels to the pole shaft, removing
existing flat plate reinforcement on the pole, installing additional anchor rods to the base plate, and installing a
concrete collar to the tower base foundation. The proposed 12' tower extension called out in these drawings
was not installed was therefore not considered.
The modifications designed by GPD (Project 2011111.18, dated 3/30/11) which consist of adding an 8.5'
extension to the top of the tower were considered in this analysis.
2) ANALYSIS CRITERIA
The structural analysis was performed for this tower in accordance with the requirements of TIA-222-G
Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures using a 3-second gust wind
speed of 120 mph with no ice, 50 mph with 0.75 inch ice thickness and 60 mph under service loads, exposure
category C with topographic category 1 and crest height of 0 feet.
Table 1 - Proposed Antenna and Cable Information
Center' Number Number Feed
Mounting Line Antenna
of Antenna Model of Feed Line Note
Level (ft) Elevation Antennas Manufacturer Lines Size (in)
(ft)
3 Antel BXA-171090/8CF
100 104 6 Antel BXA-70090/4CF
6 RFS/Celwave FD9R6004
tnxTower Report - version 6.0.4.0
Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012
100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/ 8.5' Extension Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579
Project Number 2012775.806579.01, Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 4
Table 2 - Existing and Reserved Antenna and Cable Information
Center Number Number Feed
Mounting Line Antenna
of Manufacturer Antenna Model of Feed Line Note
Level (ft) Elevation
(ft) Antennas Lines Size (In)
108 110 6 Kathrein 800 10504 12 1-5/8 1
_ 108 1 FT-Arm Mount [TA 702-3] 1 3/8
F 3 Ante[ ADA-63406380CF
104 - T- An - 2
tel ~ADA-85408580CF
100 100 -6- Platform Mount [LP 602-1]1 1 F 3/8
1 --Comsat RSI A-18A24N-U 12 7/8 ~J 11 1 j T-Arm Mount [TA 602-3]
3 Andrew I E15S08P80
90 90 3 Andrew 5S09P94 24 7/8
j 6 Andrew -
TMBXX-6516-R2M
6 EMS Wireless RR65-19-02DP
82 r 12 Decibel DB845N65ZAXT
$0 80 1- Platform Mount [LP 305-1 ] I 12 7B
1 T -Arm Mount [[A 602-3]
3 Allgon 7250.02
70 70 3 -Kathrein -800 10121 12 7/8
3 Powerwave 7770.00
3 Powerwave LGP17205
6 Powerwave TTAW-0000112-001
- -
30 30 1 Pipe Mount [PM 601-1] 1 1/2 1
j 1 Maxrad GPS-TMG-26NMS
Notes:
1) Reserved equipment.
2) The existing equipment shall be removed prior to the installation of the proposed loading and was not considered in the
analysis.
Table 3 - Design Antenna and Cable Information
Center Number Number Feed
Mounting Line Antenna
of Antenna Model of Feed Line
Level (ft) Elevation Antennas Manufacturer Lines Size (in)
(ft)
12 _ ALP 9212
100 100 1 AMPS type platform
3 DB560
80 80 2 8' Standard Dishes
tnxTower Report - version 6.0.4.0
Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012
100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/ 8.5' Extension Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579
Project Number 2012775.806579.01, Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 5
3) ANALYSIS PROCEDURE
Table 4 - Documents Provided
Document Remarks Reference Source
Original Tower Drawings EEI Job BCSONN1 257, dated Doc ID 642734 Crown DMZ
Edwards & Kelcey, Inc. Dwg r-
Foundation Drawings 92_8012, dated 7/31/91 Doc ID 260900 Crown DMZ
Geotechnical Report FDH Projec10/12/04 1016E, dated i Doc ID 949960 Crown DMZ
PJF Job 41704-152, dated
Modification Drawings Doc ID 2412725 Crown DMZ
11/30/05
GPD Project 2010111.14 Rev.
Modification Drawings Doc ID 2619474 Crown DMZ
C, dated 8/18/10
Modification Drawings GPI) Project 2011111.18, dated Doc ID 2861710 Crown DMZ
3/30/11
!GPD Project 2010111.68, dated
Post Modification Inspection 3130/11 Doc ID 2710931 Crown DMZ
Previous Structural Analysis iGPD Project 2011178.90, dated Doc ID 2877581 Crown DMZ
4/29/11
3.1) Analysis Method
tnxTower (version 6.0.4.0), a commercially available analysis software package, was used to create a
three-dimensional model of the tower and calculate member stresses for various loading cases.
Selected output from the analysis is included in Appendix A.
3.2) Assumptions
1) Tower and structures were built in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications.
2) The tower and structures have been maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's
specification.
3) The configuration of antennas, transmission cables, mounts and other appurtenances are as
specified in Tables 1 and 2 and the referenced drawings.
4) When applicable, transmission cables are considered as structural components for calculating
wind loads as allowed by TIA-222-G.
5) Mount sizes, weights, and manufacturers are best estimates based on photos provided and
determined without the benefit of a site visit by GPD.
6) All member connections and foundation steel reinforcing are assumed designed to meet or
exceed the load carrying capacity of the connected member and surrounding soils respectively
unless otherwise specified in this report.
7) All equipment model numbers, quantities, and centerline elevations are as provided in the CCI
CAD package dated 4/10/12 with any adjustments as noted below.
This analysis may be affected if any assumptions are not valid or have been made in error. GPD
Group should be notified to determine the effect on the structural integrity of the tower.
4) ANALYSIS RESULTS
Table 5 - Section Capacity (Summary)
Section Elevation (ft) Component Size Critical P (K) SF'P allow °A Pass I Fail
No. Type Element (K) Capacity
L1 108.5 100.5 Pole TP12xl2x0.375 1 -0.80 431.40 19.3 Pass
tnxTower Report - version 6.0.4.0
Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012
100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/ 8.5' Extension Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579
Project Number 2012775.806579.01, Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 6
Section Elevation (ft) Component Sae critical P (K) PP allow % Pass /Fall
No. Type Element (K) Cal tty
L2 100.5-100 Pole TP14.5xl2x0.375 _ 2 -0.80 431.40 1 19.3 ( Pass
1
L3 100-82.083 1 Pole TP18.5691xl4.5x0.1875 ' 3 4.68 785.97 j 91.9 Pass
82.083-
L4 70.2338 Pole+Reinf. TP21.2603xl8.569lx0.72691 4 8.58 3418.84 i 51.9 Pass
~ _
LS ! 6013667 I Pole+Reinf. TP22.7702x19.0894x0.7502 5 -14.62 1 3920.82 72.3 Pass
L6 33 ~~77 Pole+Reinf. TP29.0368x22.7702x0.8909 6 -22.46 5744.37 76.3 ( Pass
.7477 _
-33-7477-
33
TP29.0291x26.2755x0.9002 7 25.33 5750.99 I
L7 30.5 Pole+Reinf. 77.1 Pass
L8 162083 1 Pole+Reinf. i TP32.2955x29.0291x0.8978 8 -32.82 ICI 6690.52 1 85.4 Pass
~ - I - i
L9 16.2083 - ! Pole+Reinf. TP33.0383x32.2955x0.9036 9 34 31 6891.80 86.8 j Pass j
12 9583 - - I
L70 12.9583-9 ! Pole+Reinf. TP33.943x33.0383x0.9784 10 36.28 7655.02 81.4 Pass
L11 9-0 Pole+Reinf. TP36x33.943x0.7501 11 39 87 6275.66 104 5 Pass
Summary
i
Pole (1-3) 1 104.5 T Pass
I
Rating - 1 104.5 Pass
Table 6 - Tower Component Stresses vs. Capacity - LC1
Notes Component Elevation (ft) % Capacity Pass / Fail
1 Anchor Rods 0 68.5 Pass
1 Base Plate 0 81.3 Pass
Base Foundation
1 Soil Interaction 0 48.0 Pass
Structure Rating (max from all components) = 104.5%
Notes:
1) See additional documentation in "Appendix C -Additional Calculations" for calculations supporting the % capacity
consumed.
2) Capacities up to 105% are considered acceptable based on analysis methods used.
4.1) Recommendations
We recommend installing additional reinforcing to the monopole shaft. All modifications would need
to be engineered and are beyond the scope of this report.
tnxTower Report - version 6.0.4.0
Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012
100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/ 8.5' Extension Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579
Project Number 2012775.806579.01, Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 7
5) DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES
GPD GROUP has not performed a site visit to the tower to verify the member sizes or antenna/coax loading. If
the existing conditions are not as represented on the tower elevation contained in this report, we should be
contacted immediately to evaluate the significance of the discrepancy. This is not a condition assessment of the
tower or foundation. This report does not replace a full tower inspection. The tower and foundations are
assumed to have been properly fabricated, erected, maintained, in good condition, twist free, and plumb.
The engineering services rendered by GPD GROUP in connection with this Structural Analysis are limited to a
computer analysis of the tower structure and theoretical capacity of its main structural members. All tower
components have been assumed to only resist dead loads when no other loads are applied. No allowance was
made for any damaged, bent, missing, loose, or rusted members (above and below ground). No allowance was
made for loose bolts or cracked welds.
GPD GROUP does not analyze the fabrication of the structure (including welding). It is not possible to have all
the very detailed information needed to perform a thorough analysis of every structural sub-component and
connection of an existing tower. GPD GROUP provides a limited scope of service in that we cannot verify the
adequacy of every weld, plate connection detail, etc. The purpose of this report is to assess the feasibility of
adding appurtenances usually accompanied by transmission lines to the structure.
It is the owner's responsibility to determine the amount of ice accumulation in excess of the code specified
amount, if any, that should be considered in the structural analysis.
The attached sketches are a schematic representation of the analyzed tower. If any material is fabricated from
these sketches, the contractor shall be responsible for field verifying the existing conditions, proper fit, and
clearance in the field. Any mentions of structural modifications are reasonable estimates and should not be
used as a precise construction document. Precise modification drawings are obtainable from GPD GROUP, but
are beyond the scope of this report.
Miscellaneous items such as antenna mounts, etc., have not been designed or detailed as a part of our work.
We recommend that material of adequate size and strength be purchased from a reputable tower manufacturer.
GPD GROUP makes no warranties, expressed and/or implied, in connection with this report and disclaims any
liability arising from material, fabrication, and erection of this tower. GPD GROUP will not be responsible
whatsoever for, or on account of, consequential or incidental damages sustained by any person, firm, or
organization as a result of any data or conclusions contained in this report. The maximum liability of GPD
GROUP pursuant to this report will be limited to the total fee received for preparation of this report.
tnxTower Report - version 6.0.4.0
Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012
100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/ 8.5' Extension Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579
Project Number 2012775.806579.01, Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 8
APPENDIX A
TNXTOWER OUTPUT
tnxTower Report - version 6.0.4.0
1085!
m m DESIGNED APPURTENANCE LOADING
e TYPE ELEVATION TYPE ELEVATON
m rv
u c o
_ T -Arm Mount FA702-3) 108 E15a00P80 -'80
m f m 80010_501 wWount Am 1108 IE15a08P80 90
~o ,~1 °m ° R _e . 1W.Sfl .80010501 onnt P, IN ~E15a0aPJ _ .90
wrM
01 $ m 4 (2)BWwRAauotP" 108--- _ E15a0aP91 90
m (2)80015 wNounlPce IN E1550BP84 s0 -
'm^ - -
Q 11JAMount ILP 60211 _ 103 RMtwm30S1 80
r _
x4'MOUM Pipe 100 111 p)DBBI51*ILPSN65UXTwIMOUM Pipe -80
Y x4' Mount Pipe 100 (4) D11845165D wMOeM Pipe -00
m n $ Yx4'MouMPice 100 (4) DB,MNW5A)R wNourt Pipe W
A-10B2411UaxM200g0 100 T-Anm MowI ITA 60281 ]0
r44(Y w1 6o-MUefl Not, 100 80010121 W Mows Pice 70
(~BJU/60'Mawlp pe.100 !BW 10131 w/Ma+M Rpe ]o
(AB 700MJ w/W NAM Rte 1W 80010121 md Mount R, 70
1 1 ' 9%ht]t OBOrBCF wMOwfl Ppa 1100 7T20.W wn4oue Pipe 70
82.1fl 13xh17 100LLTLF wAbutl Rpe 1[0 1!000 w/MOuB%pe ]0
C4 poe
090I8CF w4MOwi 100 ]2]000 w/Mouil Rpe 70
(2)FUBRBW9 180 -125002 w/MwX Rpe 70
.(Z)FDBRBW4 100 .225002 w/Mount Ripe 70
- -m FI)R80N 100 725003 w/ Mount Roo 70
m u m
'T-A/m Mount rrA 602-31 80 LGPi)IDS -70
o `rv
' 0 TMB%)[8516-R2M /Mount P R B3 LGP17A5 70
/ r (1)2A1B%%6516R2M /MOUniPce 90 LGP1]2p5 - 70
' l .(2)TMB%X851&R2M /MouMpipe 90 m TrANF00110112-1 70
i (2) RRBS1902DPwlMount Pice W 1. m TTAN40W0112-MOOt 120
_w RR65-19-WDP w/neuMt pipe _W (2) TrAWUW0112-N1 70
(2) RRBSI9-02DP w/ mound pipe 50 N(e MJ IPM 640I-11 W
'Ells W 00 3PS7MG26NM5 '.30
MATERIAL STRENGTH
60.211 - GRADE Fy Fu GRADE Fy Fu
IASSB-35 35 ks1 '63.i ''..457265 65 k9 '..00 Mi
O TOWER DESIGN NOTES
1. Tower is located in Suffolk County, New York.
1 2. Tower designed for Exposure C to the TIA-222-G Standard.
3. Toyer designed for a 120 mph basic wind in accordance with the TIA-222-G Standard.
C Tower is also designed for a 50 mph basic wind with 075 in ice. Ice is considered to
e increase in thickness with height.
a m 5. Deflections are based upon a 60 mph wind.
rv rv 6. Tower Structure Class II.
7. Topographic Category 1 with Crest Height of 0.00 ft
33.2!
305 ft
ALL REACTIONS
ARE FACTORED
AXIAL
68K
tezn SHFJIR \ MOMENT
7 K 543 kip-ft
_ 0 1 130!
TORQUE 0 kip-ft
50 mph WIND - a 7500 m ICE
son i AXIAL
40K
SHEA MOMENT
m 46K 3282 kip-ft
Ooft-
TORQUE 1 kip-ft
s REACTIONS - 120 mph WIND
t o
& p'
m
0 0
19 z iw r v.
GPD Group JobNY Cutch0 ue, Bl/#: 806579
,j#J 520 South Main St.; Suite 2531 JJ 2012775.808579.01
GPD CROL)P Akron, OH 44311 cram: Crown Cast] Drown by tbowma APPU'
coosunirg Engineers Phone: (330) 572-2100 cod`- TIA-222-G Dale'. 04)19/12 scare: NTS
FAX: 330 572-2101 PMn lzptzxtznseararse~wwosz2em Dw9 MO'E-1
Feedline Distribution Chart
01 -108,61,
Routs FWI N pJo Fam p pOW Face Truss Lm
Face A Face B Face C 00.50
,pB.50 15050 - 150.50
,
1ws0. MOD 1w.w 10050
fig oo ww
I
85w i 6550
0208._. -I 6150 81.50 0208
8000 c 60.50 =
r H
u
75,50
m m
p
7023 7225 @ 72,25
)Ow ]Ow 7023
W25 _ m W.26 0 a rc rc rc
60.17. ° O u
< c
C LLU p N Q U U U a
Q rv Z E - E
rv Z Z E
W 91 Qe i
1 O i
i~ Off'
3J]5.`
i r-. -a_? 33 75
I
3050.1 3450 3050 _ 30.50
~ i
0
m m o 0
16 21 1611
LL U V - t-` U
1209
1206
9,00
050
Goo .050 0.50 .....000
GPD Group lob - NY Cutche ue, BU#: 806579
///j, 520 South Main St.; Suite 2531 Prue`" 20127 .806579.01
CPD CRCAJP Akron, OH 44311 aem: Crown CasU by tCowma Apps:
comu6inp EnOneea Phone: (330) 572-2100 Oad TIA-222-G Dale: 04/19/12 smie: NTS
FAX: 330 572-2101 Pal6: r3pl Z~punMmS]a01m,MCfi51a ~i O' 9N- E-7
'
tnxTower Job NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 Page 1 of 18
GPD Group Project Data
520 South Main St.; Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12
Akron, OH 44311 Client Designed by
Phone: (330) 572-2100 Crown Castle
FAX (330) 572-2101 tbowman
Tower Input Data
There is a pole section.
This tower is designed using the TIA-222-G standard.
The following design criteria apply:
Tower is located in Suffolk County, New York.
Basic wind speed of 120 mph.
Structure Class II.
Exposure Category C.
Topographic Category 1.
Crest Height 0.00 ft.
Nominal ice thickness of 0.7500 in.
Ice thickness is considered to increase with height.
Ice density of 56 pcf.
A wind speed of 50 mph is used in combination with ice.
Temperature drop of 50 OF.
Deflections calculated using a wind speed of 60 mph.
A non-linear (P-delta) analysis was used.
Pressures are calculated at each section.
Stress ratio used in pole design is 1.
Local bending stresses due to climbing loads, feedline supports, and appurtenance mounts are not considered.
Options
Consider Moments - Legs Distribute Leg Loads As Uniform Treat Feedline Bundles As Cylinder
Consider Moments - Horizontals Assume Legs Pinned Use ASCE 10 X-Brace Ly Rules
Consider Moments - Diagonals d Assume Rigid Index Plate q Calculate Redundant Bracing Forces
Use Moment Magnification d Use Clear Spans For Wind Area Ignore Redundant Members in FEA
d Use Code Stress Ratios J Use Clear Spans For KUr SR Leg Bolts Resist Compression
Use Code Safety Factors - Guys Retension Guys To Initial Tension J All Leg Panels Have Same Allowable
Escalate Ice J Bypass Mast Stability Checks Offset Girt At Foundation
Always Use Max Kz J Use Azimuth Dish Coefficients d Consider Feedline Torque
Use Special Wind Profile J Project Wind Area of Appurt. Include Angle Block Shear Check
Include Bolts In Member Capacity J Autocalc Torque Am Areas Poles
Leg Bolts Are At Top Of Section SR Members Have Cut Ends Include Shear-Torsion Interaction
Secondary Horizontal Braces Leg Sort Capacity Reports By Component Always Use Sub-Critical Flow
Use Diamond Inner Bracing (4 Sided) J Triangulate Diamond Inner Bracing Use Top Mounted Sockets
Add IBC 6D+W Combination
Tapered Pole Section Geometry
Section Elevation Section Splice Number TOP Bottom Wall Bend Pole Grade
Length Length of Diameter Diameter Thickness Radius
ft ft ft Sides in in in in
LI 108.50-100.50 8.00 0.00 Round 12.0000 110000 0.3750 A53-13-35
(35 ksi)
L2 100.50-100.00 0.50 0.00 Round 12.0000 14.5000 0.3750 A53-B-35
(35 ksi)
L3 100 00-82 08 17.92 0 00 12 14.5000 18.5691 0.1875 0.7500 A572-65
(65 ksi)
L4 82 08-7013 11.85 116 12 18.5691 21.2603 03269 2.9076 A572-65
(65 ksi)
L5 70.23-60.17 13.22 0.00 12 19.0894 22.7702 03502 3.0008 A572-65
(65 ksi)
tnxTower Job NY Cutchogue, BUM 806579 Page 2 of 18
GPD Group Project Date
520 South Main St.; Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12
Akron, OH 44311 Client Designed by
Phone: (330) 572-2100 Crown Castle
FAX; (330) 572-2101 tbOWlTlan
Section Elevation Section Splice Number Top Bottom Walt Bend Pole Grade
Length Length of Diameter Diameter Thickness Radius
ft ft ft Sides in in in in
L6 60.17-33.75 26.42 4.13 12 22.7702 29.0368 0.8909 3.5636 A572-65
(65 ksi)
L7 33.75-30.50 7.38 0.00 12 26.2755 29.0291 0.9002 3.6008 A572-65
(65 ksi)
L8 30.50-1621 14.29 0.00 12 29.0291 32.2955 0.8978 3.5912 A572-65
(65 ksi)
L9 16.21-12.96 3.25 000 12 32.2955 33.0383 0.9036 3.6144 A572-65
(65 ksi)
LIO 12.96-9-00 396 0.00 12 33-0383 33.9430 09784 3.9136 A572-65
(65 ksi)
LII 9.00-0.00 9.00 12 33.9430 36.0000 0.7501 3.0004 A572-65
(65 ksi)
Tapered Pole Properties
Section Tip Dia. Area 1 r C UC J RAQ w w/t
in tnt in' in in in3 in, in, in
LI 12.0000 136954 231.5276 4.1152 6.0000 38.5879 4614244 6.8436 ODOM 0
12.0000 116954 231.5276 4.1152 6.0000 38.5879 462,4244 6.8436 0.0000 0
L2 12.0000 116954 231.5276 4.1152 6.0000 38.5879 462.4244 6.8436 0.0000 0
14.5000 16.6406 4153261 5.0003 7.2500 57.2864 829.5207 8.3153 0.0000 0
L3 150115 8.6412 225.9382 5.1239 7.5110 30.0810 457.8120 4.2529 3.3835 18.045
19.2241 11.0979 478.6224 6.5806 9.6188 49.7591 969.8188 5,4620 4.4740 23.861
L4 19 2241 41.7618 1696.9213 6.3875 9.6188 176.4173 3438A226 20.5539 3.0284 4.166
22.0103 48.0608 2586.4203 7.3510 11.0128 234.8551 52403887 23.6541 3.7497 5.158
L5 20.6726 443009 1901.7684 6.5654 9.8883 192.3253 3853.4984 21.8036 3.1054 4.139
23.5734 53.1925 3292.0834 7.8832 11.7950 279.1092 6670.6534 26.1797 4.0919 5.454
L6 23.5734 62.7651 3835.0502 7.8328 11.7950 325.1430 7770.8514 30.8911 3.7148 4.17
30.0611 80.7421 8164 2482 10.0762 15.0411 542.7973 16542.9804 39.7388 5.3943 6.055
L7 28.7981 73.5538 6045.2210 9.0843 13.6107 444.1525 122492566 362010 4.6293 5.143
30.0531 81.5357 8234.5350 10.0701 15.0371 547.6155 16685 4003 40.1294 5.3673 5.962
L8 30.0531 81.3252 8214.6834 10.0710 15.0371 5462953 16645.1757 40.0258 53737 5.985
33,4348 90.7681 11421.2840 11,2404 16.7291 682.7208 23142.6178 44.6733 6.2491 6.96
L9 33.4348 91.3376 11488.6990 11.2383 16.7291 686.7506 232792189 44.9536 6.2335 6.899
342038 93.4989 12323.6908 11.5042 17.1138 720,1009 24971.1387 46.0173 6.4326 7.119
LIO 342038 101.0030 13250.8811 11,4774 17.1138 774.2787 268491775 49.7106 6.2322 637
35.1404 103.8533 14404.6164 11.8013 17.5825 8192599 29187.6581 51.1134 6.4746 6.618
LII 35.1404 80.1715 11274.4815 11.8831 17.5825 641.2341 22845.1563 394580 7.0865 9447
37.2699 85.1399 135011364 116195 18.6480 724.1064 27361.0153 41.9032 7.6377 10.182 I
Tower Gusset Gusset Gusset Grade Adjust. Factor Adjust. Weight Malt. Double Angle Double Angle
Elevation Area Thickness AJ Factor Stitch Bolt Stitch Bolt
(perface) A, Spacing Spacing
Diagonals Horizontals
B Jr, in in in
LI 1 1 1
108.50-100.50
L2 1 I 1
100.50-100 00
L3 1 1 1
10000-8208
L4 82.08-7023 1 1 1
L5 70.23-60.17 1 1 1
L6 60.17-33.75 1 1 1
L7 33.75-30.50 1 1 1
L8 30.50-16 21 1 1 1
L916.21-12.96 1 1 1
L) 0 12.96-9 00 1 1 1
tnxTower Job Page
NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 3 of 18
GPD Group Project Date
520 South Main St.; Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12
Akron, OH44311 Client Designed by
Phone: (330) 572-2100 Crown Castle tbOWman
FAX: (330) 572-1101
Tower Gusset Gusset Gusset Grade Adjust Factor Adjust. Weight Mult. Double Angle Double Angle
Elevation Area Thickness Ar Factor Stitch Bolt Stitch Bolt
(perface) A, Spacing Spacing
Diagonals Hori=ovals
ft ft, in in in
L 119.00-0 .00 I 1 1
Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances - Entered As Round Or Flat
Description Sector Component Placement Total Number Start/End Width or Perimeter Weight
Type Number Per Row Position Diameter
ft in in kl(
LDF7-50A (1-5/8 FOAM) A Surface At 108.00-800 12 6 0,000 1.9800 0.00
(CaAa) 0.000
LDF2-50A (3/8 FOAM) A Surface At 108.00 - 8.00 1 1 0 000 0.0000 0.00
(CaAa) 0.000
LDF4P-50A(1/2 FOAM) A Surface At 30.00-8.00 I 1 0000 0.0000 0.00
(CaAa) 0.000
MP3-08 Mod Channel (Rev G) A Surface Af 30,50-0,50 I 1 0.000 7.9300 24 9100 0.00
(CaAa) 0.000
MP3-08 Mod Channel (Rev G) B Surface Af 30.50-0.50 1 1 0.000 7.9300 24.9100 0.00
(CaAa) 0.000
MP3-08 Mod Channel (Rev G) C Surface Af 30.50-0.50 1 I 0.000 79300 24.9100 0.00
(CaAa) 0.000
MP3-06 Mod Channel (Rev G) A Surface Af 85.50 - 30.50 1 1 0 000 6.8900 21,9900 0.00
(CaAa) 0.000
MP3-06 Mod Channel (Rev G) B Surface Af 85.50 - 30.50 1 1 0.000 6.8900 21.9900 0.00
(CaAa) 0.000
MP3-06 Mad Channel (Rev G) C Surface Af 8550-30.50 1 1 0.000 6.8900 21.9900 0.00
(CaAa) 0.000
Bridge Stiffeners B Surface Af 72.25 - 66.25 1 1 0.000 3.8151 27.6250 0,05
(CaAa) 0.000
Bridge Stiffeners B Surface Af 81.50 - 75.50 1 1 0.000 3.8151 27.6250 0.05
(CaAa) 0.000
Bridge Stiffeners C Surface Af 72.25-6625 1 1 0.000 3.8151 27.6250 0.05
(CaAa) 0.000
Bridge Stiffeners C Surface Af 81.50 - 75.50 1 1 0.000 3.8151 27.6250 0.05
(CaAa) 0.000
Step Pegs C Surface At 108.50 - 8.00 1 1 0.000 0.0000 0.00
(CaAa) 0.000
Safety Line 3/8 C Surface At 108.50 - 8.00 1 1 0.000 0.0000 0.00
(CaAa) 0.000
Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances - Entered As Area
Description Face Allow Component Placement Total CA, Weight
or Shield Type Number
Leg ft fi'/F klf
LDF5-50A (7/8 FOAM) A No Inside Pole 100.00 - 8,00 12 No Ice 0.00 0.00
1/2" Ice 0,00 0.00
1" Ice 0.00 0.00
LDF2-50A (3/8 FOAM) A No Inside Pole 100.00 - 8.00 1 No Ice 0,00 0.00
1/2" Ice 0.00 0.00
1" Ice 0.00 0.00
LDF5-50A (7/8 FOAM) B No Inside Pole 90.00-8.00 24 No Ice 0.00 0.00
1/2" Ice 0.00 0.00
P Ice 0.00 0.00
LDF5-50A (7/8 FOAM) C No Inside Pole 80.00-8.00 12 No Ice 0.00 0.00
1/2" Ice 0.00 0.00
V Ice 0.00 0.00
Flsaj Tower Job Page
NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 4 of 18
GPD Group Project Date
520 South Main St.; Suite 1531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04119/12
Akron, OH44311 Client Designed by
Phone: (330) 572-2100 Crown Castle
FAX: (330) 572-2101 tbowman
Description Face Allow Component Placement Total CAA Weight
or Shield Type Number
Leg ft ft'/ft kl
LDF5-50A (7/8 FOAM) C No Inside Pole 70.00-8,00 12 No Ice 0.00 0.00
12" Ice 0.00 0.00
1" Ice 0.00 0.00
Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances Section Areas
Tower Tower Face As AF CAAA CaA, Weight
Section Elevation In Face Out Face
t ft, ft, f,2 ft' K
L1 108.50-100.50 A 0.000 0.000 8.910 0.000 0.07
B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00
C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.02
L2 100.50-100.00 A 0.000 0.000 0.594 0.000 0.00
B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00
C 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00
L3 100.00-82.08 A 0.000 0.000 25,209 0.000 0,25
B 0.000 0.000 3.924 0.000 0.06
C 0.000 0.000 3.924 0.000 0.05
L4 8208-7023 A 0.000 0.000 27.684 0.000 0.17
B 0.000 0 000 18.704 0.000 0,49
C 0.000 0.000 18704 0.000 0 47
L5 70.23-60.17 A 0.000 0.000 23.520 0.000 0.14
B 0.000 0.000 14.093 0.000 0 28
C 0.000 0.000 14.093 0.000 0.31
L6 60.17-33.75 A 0.000 0.000 61.724 0.000 037
B 0000 0.000 30.338 0.000 021
C 0.000 0.000 30.338 0.000 0.29
L7 33.75-30.50 A 0.000 0.000 7.588 0.000 0.05
B 0.000 0.000 3 729 0.000 0.03
C 0.000 0.000 3.729 0.000 0.04
L8 30.50-16.21 A 0.000 0.000 35.867 0.000 0,20
B 0.000 0.000 18.889 0 000 0.11
C 0.000 0.000 18.889 0.000 0.16
L9 1621-12.96 A 0000 0.000 8.156 0.000 0.05
B 0.000 0.000 4295 0.000 003
C 0.000 0-000 4.295 0.000 0.04
LIO 12.96-9.00 A 0.000 0.000 9934 0.000 0.06
B 0.000 0.000 5.232 0.000 0.03
C 0.000 0.000 5.232 0.000 0.04
LII 9.00-0.00 A 0.000 0.000 12,422 0.000 0.01
B 0.000 0.000 11.234 0.000 0,01
C 0-000 0.000 11 234 0.000 0,01
Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances Section Areas - With Ice
Tower Tower Face Ice Are AF CAA CAAA Weight
Section Elevation or Thickness In Face Out Face
ft Leg in fly ft, ft, fe" K
L1 108.50-100.50 A 1.683 0.000 0.000 16.819 0,000 0.31
B 0.000 0,000 0.000 0.000 0.00
C 0.000 0.000 5.386 0.000 0.08
L2 100.50-100.00 A 1.676 0.000 0.000 1.120 0.000 0.02
B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 00
C 0.000 0.000 0.335 0.000 0.00
L3 100.00-82 08 A 1 660 0.000 0.000 45.045 0,000 0.87
B 0.000 0 000 5.058 0.000 0.13
C 0.000 0.000 16.952 0.000 024
tnxTower Job Page
NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 5 of 18
GPD Group Project Date
510 South Main St.; Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04119112
Akron, OH44311 Client Designed by
Phone: (330) 572-2100 Crown Castle tbowman
FAX: (330) 572-2101
i
Tower Tower Face Ice As AF CAA.A CAAA Weight
Section Elevation or Thickness In Face Out Face
ft Leg in ft ftr ft' tt K
L4 82.08-7023 A 1.631 0.000 0.000 43.761 0.000 0.74
B 0.000 0.000 23.362 0.000 0.88
C 0.000 0 000 31.090 0.000 0.93
L5 70.23-60.17 A 1.605 0.000 0000 37.180 0.000 0.63
B 0.000 0.000 17.776 0.000 0.54
C 0.000 0.000 24.342 0.0(10 0.64
L6 60.17-33.75 A 1.552 0.000 0.000 96.223 0.000 1,58
B 0.000 0.000 38.539 0.000 0.65
C 0.000 0.000 54.940 0.000 0.89
L7 33 75-30.50 A 1 496 0.000 0.000 11.829 0.000 0.19
B 0.000 0.000 4.738 0.000 0.08
C 0.000 U00 6.754 0.000 0.11
L8 30.50-16.21 A 1.448 0.000 0,000 57.560 0,000 0.87
B 0.000 0.000 21028 0.000 036
C 0.000 0.000 31.308 0.000 0.47
L9 16.21-12.96 A 1.382 0.000 0.000 12.940 0.000 0.19
B 0.000 0.000 5.194 0.000 0.08
C 0.000 0.000 6.991 0.000 0.10
LIO 12.96-9.00 A 1.344 0.000 0.000 15.630 0000 0.23
B 0.000 0.000 6.295 0.000 0.09
C 0.000 0.000 8,423 0.000 0.12
LII 9.00-0.00 A 1.228 0.000 0.000 15.605 0.000 0.16
B 0.000 0.000 13.321 0.000 0.13
C 0.000 0.000 13.813 0.000 0.13
Feed Line Center of Pressure
Section Elevation CPr CPz CP.r CPt
Ice Ice
J) in in in in
LI 108.50-100.50 -0.9246 -0.5338 -0.7571 -0.2214
L2 100.50-100.00 -0.9796 -0.5656 -0.8225 -02510
L3 100.00-82.08 -0.8155 -0.4708 -0.7958 -0.2348
L4 82.08-70.23 -0.2378 -0.1373 -0.3697 -0-0650
L5 70,23-60,17 -0.3522 -0.2033 -0 4727 -0.1093
L6 60.17-33.75 -0.5639 -03256 -0.6767 -0.1957
L7 33.75-30.50 -0.5923 -0.3420 -0.7193 -0.2057
L8 30.50-16.21 -0.5751 -0.3320 -0.7826 -0.2558
L9 16.21-12.96 -0.5950 -0.3435 -0.8145 -0.2717
LIO 12.96-9.00 -06029 -0.3481 -0.8254 42786
Ll1 9.00-0.00 -0.0793 -0.0458 -0.1277 -0.0448
Shielding Factor Ka
Tower Feed Line Description Feed Line K. K.
Section Record No. Segment Elev. No Ice Ice
L1 6 LDF7-50A(1-5/8 FOAM) 100.50- 1.0000 1.0000
108,00
L1 7 LDF2-50A(3/8 FOAM) 10050- 1.0000 1.0000
108.00
L1 26 Step Pegs 100,50- 1.0000 1.0000
108.50
L1 27 Safety Line 3/8 10050- 1.0000 10000
108.50
L2 6 LDF7-5iOA(1-5/8 FOAM) 100.00- L0000 10000
100.50
L2 7 LDF2-50A (3/8 FOAM) 100.00 - 1.0000 10000
tnxTower Job NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 Page
6 of 18
GPD Group Project Date
520 South Main St.; Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12
Akron, OX44311 Client Designed by
Phone: (330) 572-2100 Crown Castle
FAX: (330) 572-2101 tbowman
Tower Feed Line Description Feed Line K, K.
Section Record No. Segment Elev. No Ice Ice
100.50
L2 26 Step Pegs 100.00 - 1.0000 1.0000
100.50
L2 27 Safety Line 3/8 100.00- 1.0000 1.0000
100.50
1,3 6 LDF7-50A (1-5/8 FOAM) 82.08 - 100.00 1.0000 1.0000
L3 7 LDF2-50A (3/8 FOAM) 82.08 - 100.00 1.0000 1.0000
L3 19 MP3-06 Mad Channel (Rev 82.08 - 8550 1.0000 1.0000
G)
L3 20 MP3-06 Mod Channel (Rev 82.08 - 85.50 1.0000 1.0000
G)
L3 21 MP3-06 Mod Channel (Rev 82.08 - 85.50 1.0000 1.0000
G)
1,3 26 Step Pegs 82.08- 100.00 1.0000 1,0000
L3 27 Safety Line 3/8 82.08- 100.00 1.0000 1.0000
L4 6 LDF7-50A (1-5/8 FOAM) 70,23 - 82.08 1,0000 1.0000
L4 7 LDF2-50A (3/8 FOAM) 70.23 - 8108 1.0000 1.0000
L4 19 MP3-06 Mod Channel (Rev 7023 -82,08 1.0000 10000
G)
L4 20 MP3-06 Mod Channel (Rev 7023 -82,08 1.0000 10000
G)
L4 21 MP3-06 Mod Channel (Rev 70.23 - 8108 1.0000 1.0000
G)
L4 22 Bridge Stiffeners 70.23 - 72 25 1.0000 1.0000
L4 23 Bridge Stiffeners 75.50 - 81.50 1.0000 1.0000
L4 24 Bridge Stiffeners 70 23 - 72 25 10000 10000
L4 25 Bridge Stiffeners 75.50 - 81.50 1.0000 1.0000
L4 26 Step Pegs 7023 - 82.08 1.0000 1.0000
L4 27 Safety Line 3/8 70.23 - 82.08 1.0000 1.0000
L6 6 LDF7-50A (1-5/8 FOAM) 3175 - 60.17 1.0000 1.0000
L6 7 LDF2-50A (3/8 FOAM) 33.75 - 60.17 1.0000 1.0000
L6 19 MP3-06 Mod Channel (Rev 3175 - 60.17 L0000 1.0000
G)
L6 20 MP3-06 Mod Channel (Rev 3175 - 60.17 1.0000 1.0000
G)
L6 21 MP3-06 Mod Channel (Rev 33.75 - 60.17 1.0000 1.0000
G)
L6 26 Step Pegs 3175 - 60.17 1,0000 1.0000
L6 27 Safety Line 3/8 33.75 - 60.17 1.0000 1.0000
L8 6 LDF7-50A (1-5/8 FOAM) 16,21 - 30.50 1.0000 1,0000
L8 7 LDF2-50A (3/8 FOAM) 16.21 - 30.50 1.0000 1.0000
L8 8 LDF4P-50A (1/2 FOAM) 1621 - 30.00 10000 1.0000
L8 16 MP3-08 Mod Channel (Rev 16.21 - 30.50 1.0000 1,0000
G)
L8 17 MP3-08 Mod Channel (Rev 16 21 - 30.50 1.0000 10000
G)
L8 18 MP3-08 Mod Channel (Rev 16.21 - 30.50 1.0000 1.0000
G)
L8 26 Step Pegs 16.21 - 30.50 1.0000 1.0000
L8 27 Safety Line 3/8 16,21 - 30.50 1.0000 1.0000
L9 6 LDF7-50A (1-5/8 FOAM) 12.96 - 16.21 1.0000 1.0000
L9 7 LDF2-50A (3/8 FOAM) 12.96 - 16.21 1.0000 1,0000
L9 8 LDF4P-50A(12 FOAM) 12.96-16.21 1.0000 1.0000
L9 16 MP3-08 Mod Channel (Rev 12.96 - 16.21 1.0000 1.0000
G)
L9 17 MP3-08 Mod Channel (Rev 1296-16,21 10000 1.0000
G)
L9 18 MP3-08 Mod Channel (Rev 12.96 - 16.21 1.0000 1.0000
G)
L9 26 Step Pegs 12 96 - 16 21 1.0000 10000
L9 27 Safety Line 3/8 12.96 - 16.21 1.0000 1,0000
LIO 6 LDF7-50A(1-5/8 FOAM) 900-12.96 10000 10000
tnxTower Job NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 Page 7 of 18
GPD Group Project Date
520 South Main St.; Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12
Akron, OH44311 Client Designed by
Phone: (330) 572-2100 Crown Castle tbownran
FAX (330) 572-1101
Tower Feed Line Description Feed Line K. K.
Section Record No. Segment Elev. No Ice Ice
LID 7 LDF2-50A (3/8 FOAM) 9,00- 12.96 1.0000 1.0000
LID 8 LDF4P-50A(12 FOAM) 9.00-12.96 1.0000 1.0000
LID 16 MP3-08 Mod Channel (Rev 9.00- 12.96 1.0000 1.0000
G)
LID 17 MP3-08 Mod Channel (Rev 9,00-12,96 1.0000 1.0000
G)
LID 18 MP3-08 Mod Channel (Rev 9.00- 12.96 1.0000 1.0000
G)
LID 26 Step Pegs 9 00 - 12.96 1.0000 1.0000
LID 27 Safety Line 3/8 900-12.96 1.0000 1.0000
LII 6 LDF7-50A(1-5/8 FOAM) 800-9.00 1.0000 1.0000
LII 7 LDF2-50A (3/8 FOAM) 8,00-9.00 1.0000 10000
LII 8 LDF4P-50A (12 FOAM) 8.00 - 9.00 1,0000 1.0000
Ll 1 16 MP3-08 Mod Channel (Rev 0.50-9.00 1.0000 1,0000
G)
LII 17 MP3-08 Mod Channel (Rev 0,50-9.00 1.0000 1.0000
G)
L11 18 MP3-08 Mod Channel (Rev 0,50-9.00 1.0000 1.0000
G)
L I I 26 Step Pegs 8,00-9,00 1.0000 1.0000
Ll I 27 Safe Line 3/8 8.00 - 9.00 1.0000 1.0000
Discrete Tower Loads
Description Face Offset Offsets: Azimuth Placement C,,L CAA Weight
or Type Hor_ Adjustment Front Side
Leg Lateral
Pert
ft o fr ft' ft' K
F
ft
T-Arm Mount [TA 702-3] C None 0.0000 108.00 No Ice 5.64 5.64 0.34
1/2" fee 6.55 6.55 0.43
I" Ice 7.46 7.46 0.52
800 10504 w/Mount Pipe A From Leg 3.46 30.0000 MUD No Ice 194 3.53 0.04
2.00 1/2" Ice 4.55 4.59 0.08
2.00 1" Ice 5.06 5.36 0.12
800 10504 w/Mount Pipe A From Leg 3.46 40.0000 108.00 No Ice 394 3.53 004
2.00 1/2" Ice 4.55 4.59 0.08
2.00 1" Ice 5.06 5.36 0.12
(2) 800 10504 w/Mount Pipe B From Leg 3 94 10-0000 108.00 No Ice 3.94 153 0.04
0.69 1/2" Ice 4.55 4.59 0.08
2.00 1" Ice 5.06 5.36 0.12
(2) 800 10504 w/Mount Pipe C From Leg 3.94 10.0000 108.00 No Ice 3.94 353 0.04
069 1/2" Ice 4.55 4.59 0.08
100 1" Ice 5.06 536 0.12
Platform Mount [LP 602-11 C None 0.0000 100.00 No Ice 32.03 32.03 1.34
1/2" Ice 38.71 38.71 1.80
1" Ice 4539 45.39 2.26
2" x 4' Mount Pipe A From 3.80 -18.0000 100.00 No Ice 0.79 0.79 0.02
Centroid-Le -1.24 1/2" Ice 1.03 1.03 0.03
g 0.00 P Ice 1.28 1.28 0.04
2" x 4' Mount Pipe B From 3.80 -18 0000 100.00 No Ice 0.79 0.79 0.02
Centroid-Le -1,24 1/2" Ice 1.03 1.03 0.03
g 0.00 I" Ice 1,28 1.28 0.04
2" x 4' Mount Pipe C From 3.80 -18 0000 100.00 No Ice 039 0.79 0.02
Centroid-Le -1,24 1/2" Ice 1 03 1.03 0 03
g 0.00 I" Ice 1,28 1.28 0.04
A-18A24N-U C From 3.80 0.0000 100.00 No Ice 6.32 6.32 0.01
Centroid-Le -1 24 1/2" Ice 6.83 6.83 0.04
tnxTnwer Job
NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 Page 8 of 18
GPD Group Project Date
520 South Main St.; Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12
Akron, OH44311 Client Designed by
Phone: (330) 572-2100 Crown Castle
fbOWman
FAX (330) 572-2101
Description Face Offset Offsets: Azimuth Placement CA, CAAA Weight
or Type Horz Adjustment Front Side
Leg Lateral
Vert
ft ft ft= ft' K
ft
ft
g 0.00 1" Ice 7.34 7.34 0.07
(2) BXA-70090/4CF w/ 60" A From 180 -18.0000 100.00 No Ice 4.01 4.04 0.04
Mount Pipe Centroid-Le -1.24 1/2" Ice 4.44 465 0.08
g 4.00 1" Ice 4.88 5.28 0.13
(2) BXA-70090/4CF w/ 60" B From 3.80 -18.0000 100.00 No Ice 4.01 4.04 0.04
Mount Pipe Centroid-Le -1,24 1/2" Ice 4.44 4.65 0.08
g 4.00 1" Ice 4.88 5,28 0.13
(2) BXA-70090/4CF w/ 60" C From 3.80 -18.0000 100.00 No Ice 4.01 4.04 0.04
Mount Pipe Centroid-Le -1.24 1/2" Ice 444 4.65 0.08
g 4.00 I" Ice 4.88 518 013
BXA-171090/SCF w/Mount A From 3.80 -18.0000 100.00 No Ice 3.63 3.80 004
Pipe Centroid-Le -1.24 12" Ice 4.25 4.83 0.07
g 4.00 1" Ice 4.78 5.57 0.12
BXA- I 71090/8CF w/Mount B From 180 -18.0000 100.00 No Ice 3.63 3.80 0.04
Pipe Centroid-Le -1.24 1/2" Ice 4.25 4.83 0.07
g 4.00 1" Ice 4 78 5.57 0.12
BXA-171090/SCF w/Mount C From 3.80 -18.0000 100.00 No lee 3.63 3.80 0.04
Pipe Centroid-Le -1.24 1/2" Ice 425 4.83 0.07
g 4.00 I" Ice 4.78 5.57 0.12
(2) FD9R6004 A From 3 80 -18.0000 100,00 No Ice 0.37 025 0.00
Centroid-Le -1.24 1/2" Ice 0.45 032 0,01
g 4.00 1" Ice 0.54 0.40 0.01
(2) FD9R6004 B From 3.80 -18.0000 100.00 No Ice 037 0.25 0.00
Centroid-Le -124 1/2" Ice 045 0.32 0.01
g 4.00 1" Ice 0.54 0.40 0.01
(2) FD9R6004 C From 3.80 -18.0000 100.00 No Ice 0.37 0.25 0.00
Centroid-Le -1,24 1/2" Ice 045 0.32 0.01
g 4 00 1" Ice 0.54 0.40 001
T-Arm Mount [TA 602-3] C None 0.0000 90.00 No Ice 11.59 11.59 0 77
12" Ice 15.44 15A4 0.99
P Ice 19.29 1919 1,21
(2) TMBXX-6516-R2M w/ A From Leg 3,46 30.0000 90.00 No lee 7.56 532 0.06
Mount Pipe 2.00 1/2" Ice 8.34 6.92 012
0 00 1" Ice 9.07 T97 0.19
(2) TMBXX-6516-R2M w/ B From Leg 3.46 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 7.56 5.72 0.06
Mount Pipe 2 00 12" Ice 8.34 6.92 0.12
0.00 1" Ice 9.07 7.97 0.19
(2) TMBXX-6516-R2M w/ C From Leg 3.46 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 7.56 5.72 0 06
Mount Pipe 2.00 1/2" Ice 8.34 6.92 0.12
0.00 P' Ice 9.07 7.97 0.19
(2) RR65-19-02DP w/ Mount A From Leg 3A6 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 6.10 441 0.04
Pipe 2 00 1/2" Ice 6.67 5.62 0.09
0.00 1" Ice 7.19 6.50 0.14
(2) RR65-19-02DP w/ mount B From Leg 3.46 300000 90.00 No Ice 6.10 4.41 0.04
pipe 2.00 1/2" lee 6.67 5.62 0.09
0.00 I" Ice 7.19 6.50 0.14
(2) RR65-19-02DP w/ mount C From Leg 3 46 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 6.10 4.41 0.04
pipe 2.00 1/2" Ice 6.67 5.62 0.09
0.00 P Ice 7.19 6.50 0.14
E15S08P80 A From Leg 3 46 30.0000 90 00 No Ice 0.23 0.12 0.01
2.00 1/2" Ice 0.30 0.17 0.01
0.00 PIce 0.38 0,24 0.02
E15S08P80 B From Leg 346 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 0.23 0.12 001
2.00 1/2" Ice 0.30 0.17 001
0.00 1" lee 0.38 024 0,02
E15S08P80 C From Leg 146 30.0000 9000 No Ice 0 23 0.12 0.01
2 00 1/2" Ice 0.30 0.17 0.01
tnxTo er Job Page
NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 9 of 18
GPD Group Project Date
520 South Main St.; Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12
Akron, OH 44311 Client Designed by
Phone: (330) 572-2100 Crown Castle tbowman
FAX: (330) 572-2101
Description Face Offset Offsets: Azimuth Placement Cvlr CAA Weight
or Type Hon Adjustment Front Side
Leg Lateral
Vert
ft ft ft' ft' K
It
f[
0.00 1" Ice 0.38 0,24 0.02
E15S09P94 A From Leg 3.46 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 0.66 0.37 0.01
2 00 1/2" Ice 0.78 0.46 0.02
0.00 1" Ice 0.90 0.56 0.03
E15S09P94 B From Leg 3.46 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 0.66 0.37 0.01
2.00 1/2" Ice 0.78 0.46 0.02
0.00 1" Ice 0.90 056 0.03
E15S09P94 C From Leg 3.46 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 0.66 037 0.01
2.00 1/2" Ice 038 0.46 0.02
0.00 P Ice 0.90 0.56 0.03
Platform Mount [LP 305-11 C None 0.0000 8000 No Ice 18.01 18.01 1.12
1/2" Ice 2333 23.33 1.35
1" Ice 28.65 28.65 1.58
(4) DB845N65ZAXT A From 3.46 30.0000 80.00 No Ice 6.31 6.63 0.04
w/Mount Pipe Centroid-Le 2.00 1/2' Ice 6.97 7.80 0.10
g 2.00 1" Ice 7.57 8.69 0.17
(4) DB845N65ZAXT B From 146 30.0000 80.00 No Ice 6.31 6.63 0 04
w/Mount Pipe Centroid-Le 100 1/2" Ice 6 97 7.80 0.10
g 2.00 1" Ice 7.57 8.69 0.17
(4) DB845N65ZAXT C From 3.46 30.0000 80.00 No Ice 6.31 6.63 0.04
w/Mount Pipe Centroid-Le 2.00 1/2" Ice 6.97 780 0.10
g 2.00 P Ice 7 57 8.69 0.17
T-Arm Mount [TA 602-3] C None 0.0000 70.00 No Ice 11.59 11,59 0.77
1/2" Ice 15.44 1544 0.99
1" Ice 19.29 1929 1,21
800 10121 w/ Mount Pipe A From Leg 336 20.0000 70.00 No Ice 5,69 4.60 0.07
1,37 1/2' Ice 6.18 5.34 0.11
0.00 1" Ice 6,67 6.04 0.17
800 10121 w/ Mount Pipe B From Leg 4.00 0.0000 70.00 No Ice 5.69 4.60 0.07
0.00 1/2" Ice 6.18 5.34 0.11
0.00 1" Ice 6.67 6.04 0.17
800 10121 w/ Mount Pipe C From Leg 4.00 0.0000 70.00 No Ice 5.69 4 60 0.07
0.00 1/2" Ice 6.18 5.34 0.11
0.00 1" Ice 6.67 6.04 0.17
7770.00 w/Mount Pipe A From Leg 3.76 20.0000 70.00 No Ice 5.88 4.10 0.06
1.37 1/2" Ice 6.31 433 0.11
000 1" Ice 6.75 5.37 0.16
7770 00 w/Mount Pipe B From Leg 4.00 0.0000 70.00 No Ice 5.88 4.10 0.06
0.00 1/2" Ice 631 4.73 0,11
0.00 1" Ice 635 5.37 0.16
7770.00 w/Mount Pipe C From Leg 4.00 0.0000 70.00 No Ice 5.88 4.10 0.06
0.00 1/2" Ice 631 4.73 0.11
0.00 I" Ice 6.75 5.37 0.16
7250,02 w/ Mount Pipe A From Leg 3.76 20.0000 70.00 No Ice 4.24 3.32 0.04
1.37 1/2" Ice 4.71 4.30 0.07
U0 1" Ice 5.17 5.05 0.11
7250.02 w/ Mount Pipe B From Leg 4 DO 0.0000 70.00 No Ice 4 24 3.32 0.04
0.00 1/2" Ice 4.71 4.30 007
0.00 P Ice 5.17 5.05 oil
7250.02 w/ Mount Pipe C From Leg 4.00 0.0000 70.00 No Ice 4 24 3.32 0.04
0.00 1/2" Ice 4.71 4.30 007
0.00 1" Ice 5.17 5.05 0.11
LGP17205 A From Leg 3.76 20.0000 70.00 No Ice 1.95 0.50 0.03
137 1/2" Ice 113 0.62 0 04
0.00 1" Ice 2.33 0.75 006
LGP17205 B From Leg 4.00 0.0000 70.00 No Ice 1.95 0.50 0.03
0 00 1/2" Ice 2.13 0.62 0.04
tnxTower Job NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 Page 10 of 18
GPD Group Project Date
520 South Main St.; Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12
Akron, OH44311 Client Designed by
Phone: (330) 572-2100 Crown Castle
FAX: (330) 572-2101 tbOWman
Description Face Offset Offsets: Azimuth Placement CA,, CAAA Weight
or Type Hor. Adjustment Front Side
Leg Lateral
Vert
ft fr ft' ft' K
ft
ft
0.00 1" Ice 2.33 0.75 0.06
LGP17205 C From Lcg 4.00 0.0000 70.00 No Ice L95 0.50 0.03
0.00 12" Ice 2.13 0.62 0.04
0.00 I" Ice 233 0 75 0.06
(2) TIAW-0000112-001 A From Leg 3.76 20.0000 70.00 No Ice 0.44 0.15 0.01
1.37 1/2" Ice 0.53 0.21 0.01
(too 1" Ice 0.63 0 29 0.01
(2) TTAW-0000112-001 B From Leg 4,00 0.0000 70.00 No lee 0.44 0.15 0.01
0-00 1/2" Ice 0.53 021 0.01
0,00 1" Ice 0.63 0,29 0.01
(2) TTAW-0000112-001 C From Leg 4M 0.0000 70.00 No Ice 0 44 0.15 0.01
0.00 1/2" Ice 0.53 0.21 0.01
000 I" Ice 0 63 0.29 0.01
Pipe Mount [PM 601-1] A From Leg 0.50 0,0000 30.00 No Ice 3.00 0.90 0.07
000 1/2" Ice 334 LI2 0.08
0,00 1" Ice 4,48 1.34 0.09
GPS-TMG-26NMS A From Leg 1.00 0,0000 30.00 No Ice 0.16 0.16 0.00
0.00 1/2" lee 0,21 0.21 0.00
0.00 1" Ice 028 028 0.01
Load Combinations
Comb. Description
Na
1 Dead Only
2 12 Dead+1.6 Wind 0 deg - No Ice
3 0.9 Dead+I.6 Wind 0 deg - No lee
4 12 Dead+1.6 Wind 30 deg - No Ice
5 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 30 deg - No lee
6 12 Dead+1.6 Wind 60 deg - No Ice
7 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 60 deg - No Ice
8 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 90 deg - No Ice
9 0.9 Dead+l 6 Wind 90 deg - No lee
10 12 Dead+1 6 Wind 120 deg- No Ice
11 09 Dead+1 6 Wind 120 deg- No Ice
12 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 150 deg- No Ice
13 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 150 deg - No Ice
14 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 180 deg- No Ice
15 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 180 deg - No Ice
16 12 Dead+1.6 Wind 210 deg - No Ice
17 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 210 deg - No Ice
18 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 240 deg- No Ice
19 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 240 deg - No Ice
20 I1 Dead+1.6 Wind 270 deg - No Ice
21 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 270 deg - No Ice
22 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 300 deg- No Ice
23 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 300 deg- No Ice
24 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 330 deg- No lee
25 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 330 deg- No Ice
26 12 Dead+1 0Ice+1.0 Temp
27 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 0 deg+1 0 lce+1.0 Temp
28 L2 Dead+1.0 Wind 30 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp
29 12 Dead+1 0 Wind 60 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp
30 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 90 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp
31 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 120 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp
sl x Qwer Job Page
NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 11 of 18
GPD Group Project Date
520 South Main St.; Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12
Akron, OH44311 Client Designed by
phone: (330) 572-2100 Crown Castle tbowman
FAX: (330) 572-2101
Comb. Description
No.
32 1.2 Dead+I.O Wind 150 deg+1.0 lce+1.0 Temp
33 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 180 deg+1.0 lce+1.0 Temp
34 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 210 deg+1.0 lce+1.0 Temp
35 1 2 Dead+1.0 Wind 240 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp
36 1.2 Dead+I.O Wind 270 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp
37 1 2 Dead+1.0 Wind 300 deg+1.0 lce+1.0 Temp
38 12 Dead+10 Wind 330 deg+I.O Ice+1.0 Temp
39 Dead+Wind 0 deg - Service
40 Dead+Wind 30 deg - Service
41 Dead+Wind 60 deg - Service
42 Dead+Wind 90 deg - Service
43 Dead+Wind 120 deg- Service
44 Dead+Wind 150 deg - Service
45 Dead+Wind 180 deg- Service
46 Dead+Wind 210 deg- Service
47 Dead+Wind 240 deg- Service
48 Dead+Wind 270 deg- Service
49 Dead+Wind 300 deg - Service
50 Dead+Wind 330 deg- Service
Maximum Reactions
Location Condition Gov. Vertical Horizontal, X Horizontal, Z
Load K K K
Comb.
Pole Max. Vert 34 68.11 154 -6.13
Max. H, 20 40.15 40.29 -0.13
Max. H, 2 40.15 -0.13 4259
Max. M, 2 3094.55 -0.13 4159
Max. M, 8 297338 -4029 0.13
Max. Torsion 20 1.33 40.29 -0.13
Min. Vert 11 30.11 -34.86 -19.99
Min. H. 8 40.15 -40.29 0.13
Min. H, 14 40.15 0.13 42.59
Min. M. 14 -3094.84 0.13 -42.59
Min. M, 20 -2973.30 4029 -0.13
Min. Torsion 8 -1.34 -40.29 0.13
Tower Mast Reaction Summa
Load Vertical Shear, Shear, Overturning Overturning Torque
Combination Moment, M. Moment, M
K K K kipfi kip-ft kip-ft
Dead Only 33,46 0.00 0.00 0.11 -0.02 0.00
11 Dead+1.6 Wind 0 deg - No 40.15 0.13 -42.59 -3094.55 -9.92 -0.04
Ice
0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 0 deg- No 30.11 0.13 -42.59 -3075.11 -9.84 -0.04
Ice
1,2 Dead+l.6 Wind 30 deg - No 40.15 23.05 -39.70 -2837.25 -1648.95 -036
Ice
0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 30 deg - No 30.11 23.05 -39.70 -2819.45 -1638.57 -0.76
Ice
12 Dead+1.6 Wind 60 deg - No 40.15 3705 -21.40 -1555.74 -269175 0.92
Ice
0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 60 deg - No 30.11 37.05 -21.40 -1545.98 -2676.78 0.93
Ice
1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 90 deg - No 40.15 4029 -0.13 -9.74 -2973.38 1.34
Wx'TQwer Job NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 Page 12 of 18
GPD Group Project Date
520 South Main St.; Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12
Akron, OH 44311 Client Designed by
Phone: (330) 572-2100 Crown Castle
FAX: (330) 572-2101 tbowman
Load Vertical Shear, Shear, Overturning Overturning Torque
Combination Moment, M. Moment, M
K K K kip-ft kip-P kip-ft
Ice
0.9 Dead+16 Wind 90 deg - No 30.11 40.29 -0.13 -9.71 -2954.46 1.34
Ice
1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 120 deg - 40.15 34.86 19.99 1486.38 -2592.89 0.97
No Ice
0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 120 deg - 30.11 34.86 19.99 1476.88 -2576.38 0.97
No Ice
1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 150 deg- 40.15 20.03 34.73 2561.50 -1478.18 0.33
No Ice
0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 150 deg - 30.11 20.03 34.73 2545.18 -1468.77 0.33
No Ice
12 Dead+1.6 Wind 180 deg - 40.15 -0.13 42.59 3094.84 9.84 0.03
No Ice
0.9 Dead+1 6 Wind 180 deg - 30.11 -0.13 42.59 3075.32 9.79 0.03
No Ice
12 Dead+1.6 Wind 210 deg - 40.15 -2105 39.70 2837.54 1648.87 0.75
No Ice
0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 210 deg - 30.11 -23.05 39.70 2819.67 1638.52 0.75
No Ice
1 2 Dead+1 6 Wind 240 deg - 40.15 -37.05 21.40 1556.02 2693.68 -0.93
No Ice
0 9 Dead+1.6 Wind 240 deg - 30.11 -37.05 21.40 1546.19 2676.73 -0.93
No Ice
12 Dead+1.6 Wind 270 deg - 40.15 -4029 0.13 10.02 2973.30 -1.33
No Ice
0.9 Dead+ l.6 Wind 270 deg- 30.11 -40.29 0.13 9.92 295441 -1.33
No Ice
1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 300 deg - 40.15 -34.86 -19.99 -1486.10 2592.81 -0.95
No Ice
0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 300 deg - 30.11 -34.86 -19.99 -1476.68 2576.32 -0.95
No Ice
1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 330 deg - 40.15 -20.03 -34.73 -2561,21 1478.10 -0.33
No Ice
0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 330 deg - 30.11 -20 03 -34.73 -2544.97 1468.71 -0.32
No Ice
1.2 Dead+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 68.11 0.00 0.00 -0.33 1.64 0.00
1 2 Dead+1.0 Wind 0 deg+1.0 68.11 0.00 -6.83 -528.19 1.51 0.04
Ice+1.0 Temp
12 Dead+1.0 Wind 30 deg+1.0 68.11 3.54 -6.13 -469.81 -269.30 -0.05
Ice+1.0 Temp
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 60 deg+1.0 68.11 5 92 -142 -26439 455.24 0 20
Ice+1.0 Temp
2 Dead+1.0 Wind 90 deg+1.0 68.11 6.79 -0.00 -0.47 -524.57 0.23
Ice+1.0 Temp
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 120 68.11 5.62 3.24 254.99 -440.34 0.14
deg+I D Ice+1.0 Temp
12 Dead+1.0 Wind 150 68.11 3.11 5.40 429.53 -246.20 0.00
deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp
12 Dead+1.0 Wind 180 68.11 -0.00 6.83 527.58 1.84 -0.04
deg+1.0 Ice+l 0 Temp
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 210 68.11 -154 6.13 469.20 272.65 0.05
deg+1 0 Ice+1 0 Temp
12 Dead+1 0 Wind 240 68.11 -592 3.42 263.78 458.59 -0.20
deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp
12 Dead+1.0 Wind 270 68.11 -6.79 0.00 -0.14 527.93 -0.23
deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 300 68.11 -5.62 -3.24 -255.60 44170 414
deg+1 0 Ice+1 0 Temp
1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 330 68.11 -3,11 -5 40 -430.13 249.56 -0.00
deg+1.0 Ice+1 0 Temp
Dead+Wind 0 deg - Service 3346 0.02 -5.95 -431.29 -141 009
WxTower Job Page
NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 13 of 18
GPD Group Project Date
520 South Main St.; Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12
Akron, OH44311 Client Designed by
Phone: (330) 572-2100 Crown Castle tbowman
FAX: (330) 572-2101
Load Vertical Shear, Shear, Overturning Overturning Torque
Combination Moment, M, Moment, M.
K K K kip-ft kip-ft kip-ft
Dead+Wind 30 deg - Service 33.46 3.22 -5.55 -395.49 -229.94 0.18
Dead+Wind 60 deg - Service 33.46 5.18 -2.99 -216.77 -375.55 0.23
Dead+Wind 90 deg - Service 33,46 5.63 -0.02 -1.25 -414,49 0.21
Dead+Wind 120 deg - Service 33 46 4.87 2.80 207.29 -361.45 0.14
Dead+Wind 150 deg - Service 33,46 2.80 4.85 357.14 -206.07 0.03
Dead+Wind 180 deg - Service 33.46 -0.02 5.95 431.53 1.34 -0.09
Dead+Wind 210 deg - Service 33.46 -322 5.55 395.74 229.87 -0.18
Dead+Wind 240 deg - Service 33,46 -5.18 2.99 217.02 375,48 -0.23
Dead+Wind 270 deg - Service 3146 -5.63 002 1.50 414.42 -0.21
Dead+Wind 300 deg - Service 3146 -4.87 -2.80 -207.05 361.39 -0.14
Dead+Wind 330 deg - Service 33,46 -2.80 -4.85 -356.90 206.00 -0.03
Solution Summa
Sum of Applied Forces Sum of Reactions
Load PX PY PZ PX PY PZ %Error
Comb. K K K K K K
I 0.00 -33.46 0.00 0.00 3146 0.00 0.000%
2 0.13 40.15 -42.59 -0.13 40.15 42.59 (1000%
3 0.13 -30.11 -42.59 -0.13 30.11 42.59 0.000%
4 23.05 -40.15 -39.70 -23.05 40.15 39.70 (1000%
5 23.05 -30.11 -39.70 -23.05 30.11 39.70 0.000%
6 37.05 40.15 -21.40 -37.05 40.15 21.40 0,000%
7 37.05 -30.11 -21.40 -37.05 30.11 2140 0,000%
8 40,29 40.15 -0.13 4029 40.15 0.13 0.000%
9 4029 -30A] -0.13 4029 30.11 0.13 0.000%
10 34.86 -40.15 19.99 -34.86 40.15 -19.99 0,000%
II 34.86 -30.11 19.99 -34.86 30.11 -19.99 0000%
12 20.03 -40.15 34.73 -20.03 40.15 -34.73 0000%
13 2003 .-30.11 34.73 -20.03 30.11 -34.73 0.000%
14 -0.13 -40.15 4159 0.13 40.15 -42.59 0000%
15 -0.13 -30.11 42.59 0.13 30.11 42.59 0.000%
16 -23.05 -40.15 39.70 23.05 40.15 -39.70 0000%
17 -2305 -30.11 39.70 23.05 30.11 -39.70 0.000%
18 -37.05 -40.15 21.40 37.05 40.15 -21.40 0000%
19 -37.05 -30.11 21,40 37.05 30.11 -2140 0000%
20 -40.29 -40.15 0.13 40,29 40.15 -0.13 0.000%
21 -4029 -30.11 0.13 4029 30.11 -0.13 0.000%
22 -34.86 -40.15 -19.99 34.86 40.15 19.99 0.000%
23 -34.86 -30.11 -19.99 34.86 30.11 19.99 0.000%
24 -20.03 -40.15 -34.73 20.03 40.15 34.73 0000%
25 -20.03 -30.11 -34.73 20.03 30.11 34.73 0-000%
26 0.00 -68.11 0.00 0.00 68.11 0.00 0.000%
27 0.00 -68.11 -6.83 -0.00 68.11 6.83 0.000%
28 3.54 -68.11 -6.13 -3.54 68.11 6.13 0.000%
29 5 92 -68.11 -3,42 -5.92 68.11 142 H00%
30 6.79 -68.11 -0.00 -6.79 68.11 0.00 0.000%
31 562 -68.11 124 -5.62 68.11 -3.24 0000%
32 111 -68.11 5.40 -3.11 68.11 -5.40 0.000%
33 -0.00 -68.11 6.83 0.00 68.11 -6.83 0.000%
34 -3.54 -68.11 6.13 3.54 68.11 -6.13 0.000%
35 -5.92 -68.11 3.42 5.92 68.11 -342 0.000%
36 -6.79 -68.11 0.00 6.79 68.11 -0.00 0.000%
37 -5.62 -68.11 -3.24 5.62 68.11 3.24 0.000%
38 -3.11 -68.11 -540 3.11 68.11 540 0.000%
39 0.02 -33,46 -5.95 -0.02 33,46 5.95 0.000%
40 322 -3146 -5.55 -3.22 3146 5.55 0.000%
41 5.18 -3346 -199 -5.18 33,46 2.99 0.000%
42 5.63 -3346 -0.02 -5.63 33,46 0.02 0.000%
WxTower Job Page
NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 14 of 18
GPD Group Project Date
520 South Main St.; Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12
Akron, OH44311 Client Designed by
Phone: (330) 572-2100 Crown Castle
FAX: (330) 572-2101 tbOWlllan
Sum of Applied Forces Sum of Reactions
Load PX PY PZ PX PY PZ % Error
Comb. K K K K K K
43 4.87 -33.46 2.80 487 33.46 -2.80 0.000%
44 2.80 -33.46 4.85 -180 33.46 -4.85 0.000%
45 -0.02 -3146 5.95 0.02 33.46 -5.95 0.000%
46 -3.22 -33.46 5.55 3.22 33.46 -5.55 0.000%
47 -5.18 -3346 2.99 5.18 33.46 -2.99 0.000%
48 -5.63 -33.46 0.02 5.63 33.46 -0.02 0.000%
49 -4.87 -3346 -2.80 4.87 33.46 2.80 0.000%
50 -2.80 -33.46 -4.85 2.80 33.46 4.85 0.000%
Non-Linear Convergence Results
Load Converged? Number Displacement Force
Combination of Cycles Tolerance Tolerance
1 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00000001
2 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00014788
3 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00008032
4 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00029929
5 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00010927
6 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00027423
7 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00010268
8 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00078894
9 Yes 4 0.00000001 000045242
10 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00028819
II Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00011098
12 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00026739
13 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00010233
14 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00016474
15 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00008889
16 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00030058
17 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00010985
18 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00029468
19 Yes 5 0.00000001 0,00011183
20 Yes 4 0.00000001 000093829
21 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00053781
22 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00026628
23 Yes 5 0.00000001 0,00010125
24 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00027864
25 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00010744
26 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00000001
27 Yes 5 0.00000001 000015183
28 Yes 5 0,00000001 0.00017401
29 Yes 5 0.00000001 000016823
30 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00015188
31 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00016434
32 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00016044
33 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00015248
34 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00017467
35 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00017043
36 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00015228
37 Yes 5 0.00000001 0,00016330
38 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00016039
39 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00001427
40 Yes 4 U000000] 0.00008413
41 Yes 4 0,00000001 0.00005838
42 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00003076
43 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00007305
44 Yes 4 000000001 0.00005596
45 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00001409
46 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00006916
snx (ewer Job Page
NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 15 of 18
GPD Group Project Date
520 South Main St; Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12
Akron, OH44311 Client Designed by
Phone: (330) 572-2100 Crown Castle tbowman
FAX: (330) 572-2101
47 Yes 4 0.00000001 000007899
48 Yes 4 0.00000001 000003128
49 Yes 4 0.00000001 0,00005498
50 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00006377
Maximum Tower Deflections - Service Wind
Section Elevation Hann Gov. Tilt Twist
No. Deflection Load
ft in Com& o
Ll 108.5 - 100.5 11,403 46 1.0042 0.0054
L2 1005- 100 9.731 46 0.9865 0.0050
L3 100 - 82.083 9.628 46 0.9853 0.0050
L4 82.083 - 70,2338 6.340 46 03207 0.0012
L5 73.3913 - 60.1667 5.083 46 0.6573 0.0010
L6 60.1667 - 33 7477 3.408 46 0.5370 0.0006
L7 37.8773 - 30.5 1.382 46 0.3318 0.0003
L8 30.5 - 161083 0.902 46 02802 0.0002
L9 16.2083 - 12.9583 0 262 46 0.1490 0.0001
LIO 119583 - 9 0.170 46 0.1205 010001
L11 9-0 0-083 46 0.0889 0.0001
Critical Deflections and Radius of Curvature - Service Wind
Elevation Appurtenance Gov. Deflection Tilt Twist Radius of
Load Curvature
ft Comb. in ft
108.00 T-Arm Mount [TA 702-3] 46 11,298 1.0031 0.0054 20005
100.00 Platform Mount [LP 602-1] 46 9.628 0.9853 00050 8056
90.00 T-Arm Mount [TA 602-3] 46 7.682 0.8537 0.0030 4196
80.00 Platform Mount [LP 305-11 46 6021 06995 0.0011 4168
70.00 T-Ann Mount [TA 602-3] 46 4 627 0.6324 0.0009 8591
30.00 Pipe Mount [PM 601-11 46 0.873 0.2763 0.0002 6389
Maximum Tower Deflections - Design Wind
Section Elevation Hor_. Gov. Tilt Twist
No. Deflection Load
ft in Comb. °
LI 108.5 - 100.5 81.537 16 7.1896 0.0378
L2 100.5 - 100 69.618 16 7.0625 0.0349
1.3 100 - 82.083 68.883 16 7.0535 0.0348
L4 81083 - 70.2338 45.413 16 5.1668 0.0079
L5 73.3913 - 60.1667 36.420 16 4.7131 0.0059
L6 60.1667 - 33,7477 24.432 16 3.8513 01)037
L7 37.8773 - 30.5 9.907 16 2.3800 0.0017
L8 30.5 - 16 2083 6.468 16 2.0098 0.0014
L9 16 2083 - 119583 1.876 16 1.0686 0.0006
LI O 12.9583 - 9 1.219 16 0.8645 0.0005
L11 9-0 0.596 16 0.6375 0.0004
Critical Deflections and Radius of Curvature - Design Wind
tnxTower Job Page
NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 16 of 18
GPD Group Project Date
520 South Main S1.; Suite 1531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19112
Akron, OH 44311 Client Designed by
Phone: (330) 572-2100 Crown Castle tbowman
FAX, (330) 572-1101
Elevation Appurtenance Gov. Deflection Tilt Twist Radius of
Load Curvature
ft Comb. in o ft
108.00 T-Arm Mount [TA 702-3] 16 80.788 7.1817 0.0376 2913
100.00 Platform Mount [LP 602-11 16 68.883 7.0535 0.0348 1170
90.00 T-Am Mount [TA 602-31 16 55.000 6.1154 0.0208 604
80.00 Platform Momt [LP 305-11 16 41135 5.0154 U066 595
70.00 T-Arm Mount [TA 602-31 16 33.156 4.5351 0.0057 1216
3000 Pipe Mount [PM 601-1] 16 6.260 1.9818 0.0013 893
Compression Checks
Pole Design Data
Section Elevation Size L L. Kbr A P. +P„ Ratio
No. P.
ft ft ft in, K K 0P.
LI 108.5-100.5 TP12xl2x0.375 8.00 0.00 0.0 13.6954 -0.84 431,40 0.002
(1)
L2 100.5-100(2) TP14.5x12x0.375 0.50 0.00 00 13.6954 -0.84 43140 0.002
L3 100-82.083 TP18.569lxl4.5x0. 1875 17.92 0.00 00 11.0979 -4.74 785.97 0.006
(3)
L4 82.083- TP212603x18.56910.7269 11.85 0.00 00 46.3823 -8.71 3418.84 0003
702338(4)
L5 70.2338- TP22.7702x19.08940.7502 13.22 0.00 00 53.1925 -14.80 3920.82 0.004
60-1667 (5)
L6 60.1667- TP29.0368x22.7702x0.8909 26.42 0.00 0.0 77.9321 -22.69 5744.37 0 004
337477(6)
L7 33.7477-30.5 TP29.029lx26.2755x0.9002 7.38 0.00 0.0 78.0218 -25.57 5750.99 0.004
(7)
L8 30.5 - 16.2083 TP32 2955x29.0291x0.8978 14.29 0.00 0.0 90 7681 -33 08 6690.52 0.005
(8)
L9 16.2083- TP33.0383x32.2955x0.9036 3.25 0.00 0.0 914989 -34.58 6891.80 0.005
12.9583(9)
L10 12.9583 - 9 TP33.943x33 0383x0.9784 3.96 0.00 0.0 103.853 -36.55 7655 02 0.005
(l0) 0
1-11 9-0(11) TP36x33 943x0.7501 9.00 0.00 00 85.1399 -40.12 6275.66 0.006
Pole Bending Design Data
Section Elevation Size M: +M Ratio m -y +M Ratio
No. M m•
ft nio-ft Wp-ft AM kip-ft kip-fi mM.
LI 108.5-100.5 TP12xl2x0.375 25.37 133.07 0.191 0.00 133.07 0.000
(1)
L2 100.5 - 100 (2) TP14.5xl2x0.375 25.37 133.07 0.191 0.00 133.07 0.000
L3 100-82.083 TPI 8.5691 x1 4.5x0. 1875 267,46 293.67 0.911 0.00 293.67 0.000
(3)
L4 82083- TP212603xl8.5691x0.7269 479.73 1341.93 0357 0.00 1341.93 0.000
702338(4)
L5 70.2338- TP22.7702x 19-0894x0 7502 88092 1714 43 0.514 0 00 1714.43 0.000
60.1667(5)
L6 60.1667- TP29.0368x22.77024.8909 1671.84 3102.67 0.539 0 00 3102.67 0 000
33.7477(6)
L7 33.7477 - 30.5 TP29.0291 x26 2755x0 9002 1832.03 3075.76 0.596 0 00 3075.76 0.000
(7)
L8 305- 162083 TP32.2955x29.029 I x0 8978 2556.62 4193-62 0-610 0 00 4193 62 0 000
(8)
WxTower Job Page
NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 17 of 18
GPD Group Project Date
520 South Main St.; Suite 1531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12
Akron, OH44311 Client Designed by
Phone: (330) 572-2100 Crown Castle
FAX. (330) 571-2101 tbowman
Section Elevation Sire Mx lI)m Ratio M, om~ Ratio
No. M. . Mn
ft kip-ft kip-ft 0Mr kip-I kip-ft bM
L9 162083 - TP33.0383x32.2955xO.9036 2698.32 442122 0.610 0.00 4423.22 0.000
12.9583(9)
LIO 12.9583-9 TP33.94303.03830.9784 2873.87 5032.30 0.571 0.00 5032.30 0.000
(10)
L11 9-0(11) TP36x33.943xO.7501 3281.83 4447,82 0.738 000 4447.82 0.000
Pole Shear Design Data
Section Elevation Size Actual ~V Ratio Actual +T Ratio
No. V. V. T. T.
ft K K +V kip-ft kip-f (I'T
Ll 1085-1005 .TP12xl2xO.375 3.44 215.70 0.016 0.54 202.31 0.003
(1)
L2 100.5 -100 (2) TP14.5x12xO.375 3.51 262.09 0.013 0.51 202.31 0.003
L3 100-82.083 TP18.569lxl4.5xO.1875 17.65 392.98 0.045 0.27 595.47 0.000
(3)
L4 82.083- TP212603x18.569lxO.7269 25.90 1709.42 0.015 0.35 2721.02 0.000
70.2338(4)
L5 70.2338- TP22.7702X19.0894xO.7502 32.91 1960.41 0.017 0.37 347632 0.000
60.1667 (5)
L6 60.1667- TP29.0368x2237020.8909 38.22 2872.19 0.013 0.13 6291.24 0.000
337477(6)
L7 33.7477 - 30.5 TP29.029I x26 2755x0 9002 39.64 2918.66 0 014 0 25 6236.67 0.000
(7)
Lit 30.5-162083 TP322955x29.0291xO.8978 43.29 3345.26 0.013 0.60 850333 0.000
(8)
L9 16.2083- TP330383x32.2955xO.9036 43.95 3445.90 0.013 0.67 8968.92 0.000
129583(9)
LIO 12.9583-9 TP33-94303-0383x0.9784 4478 382751 0012 075 10203.92 0.000
(10)
L11 9-0(11) 7P36x33.94307501 45-93 313783 0.015 0,75 9018.83 0.000
Pole Interaction Design Data
Section Elevation Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Comb. Allow. Criteria
No. P. M M4 V. T. Stress Stress
ft ClP„ $MN OM $y QT Ratio Ratio
Ll 108.5 - 100.5 0.002 0.191 0.000 0.016 0.003 0.193 1.000 48.2
?
(1) ?
L2 100.5 - 100 (2) 0.002 0.191 0.000 0.013 O M3 0.193 1.000 4X2
?
?
L3 100 - 82.083 0.006 0.911 0.000 0.045 0.000 0.919 1.000 4.82 (3) ?
L4 82 083 - 0.003 0.357 0.000 0.015 0.000 0.360 1.000 4,81
?
70.2338 (4) ?
L5 702338 - 0.004 0514 0 000 0.017 0.000 0.518 1.000 4,82
?
60.1667 (5) ?
L6 60.1667 - 0 004 0.539 0.000 0.013 0.000 0.543 1.000 482
?
33,7477(6) ?
L7 33.7477 - 30.5 0.004 0.596 0.000 0.014 0.000 0.600 1 000 48,2
(7) ?
L8 30.5 - 16.2083 0.005 0.610 0.000 0.013 0.000 0.615 1 000 4,82
?
tnxTower Job NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 Page 18 of 18
GPD Group Project Date
520 South Main St.; Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12
Akron, OH44311 Client Designed by
Phone: (330) 572-2100 Crown Castle tbowman
FAX; (330) 572-2101
Section Elevation Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Comb. Allow. Criteria
No. P. M My V. T„ Stress Stress
J1 +P„ +M +M -T--V tT. Ratio Ratio
(8) ?
L9 16,2083- 0.005 0.610 0,000 0.013 0,000 0.615 1.000 4,81
?
129583 (9) ?
LI O 12.9583 - 9 0.005 0.571 0.000 0.012 0.000 0.576 1.000 482
?
(10) ?
L11 9-0(11) 0 006 0138 0.000 0.015 0.000 0.744 1.000 4 8 2?
?
Section Capacity Table
Section Elevation Component Sice Critical P op".. % Pass
No. ft Type Element K K Capacity Fail
L1 108.5-100.5 Pole TP12xl2xO.375 1 -0.84 431.40 19.3 Pass
L2 1005- 100 Pole TP14.5xl2xO.375 2 -0.84 431,40 193 Pass
L3 100-82.083 Pole TPI8.5691x14.5x0. 1875 3 -4.74 785.97 91.9 Pass
L4 82.083 -70 2338 Pole+Reinf TP2 1.2603x18.5691xO.7269 4 -8.71 3418.84 51.9* Pass
L5 70.2338- Pole+Reinf TP227702xI 9.0894xO.7502 5 -14.80 3920.82 723* Pass
60.1667
L6 60.1667- Pole+Reinf TP29.0368x22.7702xO.8909 6 -22.69 5744.37 763* Pass
33.7477
L7 33.7477 - 30.5 Pole+Reinf TP29.029Ix26 2755x0 9002 7 -25.57 5750.99 77.1 * Pass
L8 30.5 - 16 2083 Pole+Reinf. TP32.2955x29.029 IxO.8978 8 -33.08 6690.52 85.4* Pass
L9 162083- Pole+Reinf TP3 3.0383x32.295 5xO.9036 9 -34.58 6891.80 86.8* Pass
12.9583
LIO 12.9583-9 Pole+Reinf TP33.943x33.0383xO.9784 10 -36.55 765502 81.4* Pass
LII 9-0 Pole+Reinf TP36x33.943xO.7501 11 -40.12 6275.66 104.5* Pass
Summary
Pole (L 11) 104.5 Pass
RATING= 104.5 Pass
*Refer to Appendix C for calculations supporting the %Capacity used.
Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012
100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/ 8.5' Extension Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579
Project Number 2012775.806579.01, Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 9
APPENDIX B
BASE LEVEL DRAWING
tnxTower Report - version 6.0.4.0
CROWN REGION FYpRH
E.R
eSFNLPO) 1)1/x'
1x) l/e' m m rt LflEL • m a rt lEE
Tx) T/e•)ro ro rt It~a 0 e/e• m Tart E
12)7 p•)ro a IT M. ~ jA / \ • e 1 Y [s !iie 1 1!!e
~ u Q 1 f11 Iff i
~ N o I ~!lol~~!!~
NOF eN-M) iii N1eD) j ! I 1 I
(<xa) /e• m w n yea \ T) a/e• ro ) rt L ! e !
(rsrwua) • \ / W 7A' ro IN rt LEM IcEU ~ ~ ilep
EN BY EN
O
BITE NVF9ER:
TE A.
0
Nr COTCNOOGEM2W
0
WF6)e
~.RWGO SCB CC..~iLL SIiE PCORE55
IRS FFOIY. CgMTF U.G
BASE LEVEL
FS-HEETNUMBEN
BASE LEVEL DRAWING 7
Al-0
Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012
100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/8.5' Extension Structural Analysis CC/ BU No 806579
Project Number 2012775.806579.01, Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 10
APPENDIX C
ADDITIONAL CALCULATIONS
II
I
tnxTower Report - version 6.0.4.0
A116 Reinforced Monopole Analysis
"11k, NY Cutchogue BU: 806579
G P D G R O U p 2012775.806579.01
Code= TIA-222-G-2
AISF= 1
Max Capacity= 1.05
Yof Sides= 12
P30-6 3 U 73,5787 20.5388 0.1875 6'' r 18 479.73 8.71 25.9 0.35 39.4% 51.9% Pass
MP30.8 3 'L5 80.1887 22.9987 0.2812$ M* 0.8 18 680.92 14.8 32.91 - 0.37 50.8% 72.3% Pass
SP 91 3 L8 37.8773 28.093 0.28125 65 0.8 18 1671.84 22.69 38.22 013 0 56.6% 73.7% Pass
MP30.6 3. L6 37.8773 28.093 0.28125 85 0.8 18 1671.84 22.69 38.22 013 56.6% 76.3% Pass
BP 9)(0.75 3' .5 29.0291 0.312 0.8 8 1 5.57 39.64 025 a= 55.9% 74.8% Pass
MP30.6 3 L7 30.5 29.0291 0.3125 65 0.8 16 1832.03 25.57 39.64 025 55.9% 77.1% Pass
BP 9x0.75 3 L8 16.2083 32.2955 0.3125 65 0.8 16 2556.62 33.08 43.29 06 :'q... 8° 65.1% 83.9% Pass
MP30.8 3 LB 16.2083 32.2955 0.3125 65 0.8 18 2556.62 33.08 43.29 06 __.o:8973 65.1% 85.4% Pass
BP 9x0.75 3 L8 129583 33.0383 0.3125 65 0.8 18 2698.32 34.58 43.95 0.67 63.4% 84.1% Pass
MP30.8 3 L9 12.9583 33.0383 0.3125 65 0.8 18 2698.32 34.58 43.95 067 634% 86.8% Pass
BP 9x0.75 3'. - L10 9 33.943 0.3125 65 0.8 18 2873.87 36.55 44.78 0.75 Perm, 69.1% 70.5% Pass
MP30.8 3 L10. 9 33.943 0.3125 65 0.8 18 2873,87 36.55 44.78 0.75 .,,¢.8784 69.1% 81.4% Pass
BP 9x0.75 3 L11 0 36 .0.3 125 65 0.6 18 3281.83 40.12 45.93 075 ,1.., EL7501 85.0% 88.4% Pass
MP30.6 3 L11r 0 36 0.3125 65 0.8 18 3281.83 40.12 45.93 075 ':'0;7501 85.0% 104.5% Pass
GPO Modified Monopole Analysis - V1.00
520 South Main Street • Suite 2531 • Akron, Ohio 443111 PHONE 330 572 2100 • FAX 330,572 -2 101
' GPD GROUP job: 2012775 806579.01 Calculated By TB date 4/19/2010
Engineers • Anbitece • Planners Sheer NnyOf 1 Checked By _AH date 4/19/2012
GPD GROUP
ANCHOR ROD TRANSFORMATION Rev. G)
Momentfrom RISA(M)= 3282 kip-ft
Axial from RISA(A)= 40.12 kip
Shear from RISA(V)= 45.93 Kip
eta (n) = 0.5
Existing Rod Diameter 2.25 in. Distance from neutral ads (d) = 22 in. (CAD)
Existing Rod Area (A`a) = 3.98 in.' Fy 75 ksl
Number Existing Rods (nE) 8 Fu 100 ksi
Modified Rod (1) Diameter 2.01 In.. Distance from neutral axis (d) = 23.5 In (CAD)
Modified Rod Area (Am ) = 3.17 In.' Fy 127 ksi
Number Modified Rods HIM) 4 Fu 150 ksi
Modified Rod (2) Diameter 2.79 in.' Distance from neutral ads (d) = 26.385 In. (CAD)
Modified Rod Area (A..N) = 6.11 In.' Fy 127 ksi
Number Modified Rods HW) 4 Fu 150 ksi
'Taken from Cal spec shoat
Ldem= 19608.10 in' (Combined MOl of existing and post installed rods determined in CAD, Existing & Modified (2) Anchor Rod Capacity Controlling)
I,aea1= 17576.89 in' (Combined MCI of existing and post installed rods determined in (AD,Modified (1) Anchor Rod Capacity Controlling)
f.= 175.86 kips (M'(d)'A.)/I,at,ul
(Mod 1) fee, = 166.91 kips (M"(d)'A•wo)/I,,,,112n+V/((ne4nMt+nM2)"333)
(Mod 2) f M= 323.79 kips (M"(d)'A.,,,)/I_.,,,,l+V/((nE+nMt+nMl)'.333)
Ax,,= 2.32 kips A'(A.)/(A: nE+nAedlp nM4n+nE+nAmadol'nM(,I)
(Mod 1) As,,,,= 1.84 kips A'(nA„„ntl)//(Ae'nE+nAmod,t,-nM,O+ nE+nAmodul nMpl)
(Mod 2) Axnad= 3.55 kips A'(nA„„dr,)//(A.*nE+nAmod01'nMlO+ nE+nAmod(,I nMltl)
Total= 40.12 kips
Ve' 2.65 kips A'(A.)/(Aa,"nE+nA,,o,,, nMhl+nE+nAmodlzl'nM01)
(Mod 1) V,N= 2.11 kips A'(nA,.d,tl)//(A 'nE+nAmodltl'nM,tl+nE+,Amodp,'nMpl)
(Mod 2) Vi 4.07 kips A'(nA„ 21)//(A."nE+nAmodoj nMlp+ nE+nAmodp,'nM(4)
Total= 45.93 kips
Maximum compressive force in existing rods = 178.18 kips (f„+Ax,x,)
Maximum compressive force in modification (1) rods = 168.75 kips (fcn,+AX.ad)
Maximum compressive force in modification (2) rods = 327.34 kips (fa,ad+Axn,ad)
Ultimate Axial Strength: Existing Rods (fix)= 260.00 kips
Ultimate Axial Strength: Modification (1) Rods (ftn,od)= 309.60 kips
Ultimate Axial Strength: Modification (2) Rods (ft,nod)= 582.90 kips (based on pull test load of 502 kips referenced in PMI by GPD dated 8/26/10)
Modification Rod (1) Rating= 55.9%
Modification Rod (2) Rating= 56,6%
Square, Stiffened / Unstiffened Base Plate, Any Rod Material - Rev. F /G
Assumptions: 1) Rod groups at corners. Total # rods divisible by 4. Maximum total # of rods = 48 (12 per Comer).
2) Rod Spacing = Straight Center-to-Center distance between any (2) adjacent rods (same corner)
3) Clear space between bottom of leveling nut and top of concrete not exceeding (1)'(Rod Diameter)
Site Data Base Reactions
806579
BU#. TIA Revision: G
Site Name: NYCutchogue Factored Moment, Mu: 1250.77 ft-kips
A 145544 Rev. 2 Factored Axial, Pu: 18.56 kips
Anchor Rod Data Factored Shear, Vu: 21.2 ki s
Eta Factor, 0.5 TIA G (Fig. 4-4) Note: Reactions have been modified to account
Qty: 8 for modifications
Diam: 2.25 in Anchor Rod Results
Rod Material: A615J TIA G Max Rod (Cu+ Vu/q): 178.2 Kips
Yield, Fy: 75 ksi Axial Design Strength, m`Fu`Anet: 260.0 Kips
Strength, Fu: 100 ksi Anchor Rod Stress Ratio: 68.5% Pa, s
Bolt Circle: 44 in
Anchor Spacing: 6 In
Plate Data Base Plate Results Flexural Check PL Ref. Data
W=Side: 42 in Base Plate Stress: 43.9 ksi Yield Line (in):
Thick: 2.25 in PL Design Bending Strength, m'Fy: 54.0 ksi 23.40
Grade: 60 ksi Base Plate Stress Ratio: 81.3% 355 Max PL Length:
Clip Distance: 6 in 23.40
N/A - Unstiffened
Stiffener Data (Welding at both sides) Stiffener Results
Configuration: Unstiffened Horizontal Weld : N/A
Weld Type: Vertical Weld: N/A
Groove Depth: in " Plate Flex+Shear, fb/Fb+(fv/Fv)A2: N/A
Groove Angle: degrees Plate Tension+Shear, f /Ft+(fv/Fv)A2: N/A
Fillet H. Weld: Disregard Plate Comp. (AISC Bracket): N/A
Fillet V. Weld: in Pole Results
Width: in Pole Punching Shear Check: N/A
Height: in Moa PL Length
Thick: in read Line
Notch: in n A^°"° °
5t 5t
1= BASE Pr
Grade: ksi Day/4/ THICKNESS
Weld str.: ksi @Aneh°r. "p
/ Snrrcnco CDNEALIKAnoN
Asl MSD IN Toot
Pole Data a`
Diann, 36
Thick: 0.3125 Ip c(A. + I Cleo se°ce
Grade: 65 ksi / An` chB,C,
°r Case
# of Sides: 12 °o" IF Round s
00
'r?F P' le W/
DIAM = D
A^ehpr Sp°cing A- Ae
Stinen r Spacing,
E-I,H for Sigel, Comer
Anchor (Input Cii°r Space)
Nate: for complete joint penetration groove welds the groove depth must exactly 1 the stiffener thickness or calculation purposes
CClplate 1.5 - Square Base F-G 1.2, Effective March 19, 2012 Analysis date: 4/19/2012
Stiffened or Unstiffenedr Exterior Flan9 a Plate - An Bolt Material TIA Rev G
Reactions Bolt Threads:
Site Data Mu 33.63 ft-kips X-Excluded
BU#: 806579 Axial, Pu: 1.12 kips Vn= 0.55*Ab*Fu
Site Name: NYCutchogue Shear, Vu: 4.68 kips (p=0.75, W*Vn (kips):
App 145544 Rev. 2 Elevation: 100 feet 40.50
Pole Manufacturer: Other If No stiffeners, Criteria: TIA G 1<-Only Apploable to Unstiffened Cases
Flange Bolt Results Non-Ri id
Bolt Data Bolt Tension Capacity, (p*Tn,B1: 56.81 kips ~'Tn
Qty: 12 Ad'usted T Tn (due to Vu=Vu/Qty), B: 56.81 kips ~Tnl(1-(V"TIP 1.2]"0.5
Diameter (in.): 1 Bolt Fu: 125 Max Bolt directly applied Tu: 5.13 Kips
Bolt Material: Other Bolt Fy: 105 Min. PL "tc" for B cap. w/o Pry: 2.806 in
Strength (Fu): 125 ksi Min PL "trey" for actual T w/ Pry: 0.654 in
Yield (Fy): 105 ksi Min PL "t1" for actual T w/o Pry: 0.843 in
Circle in.: 25.75 T allowable with Prying: 29.98 kips 0_<c':51 case
Prying Force, q: 0.00 kips
Plate Data Total Bolt Tension=Tu+q: 5.13 kips
Diam: 28.5 in Prying Bolt Stress Ratio=(Tu+q)/(B): 9.0% Pass
Thick, t: 1.75 in
Grade (Fy): 50 ksi Exterior Flange Plate Results Flexural Check Non-R! id
Strength, Fu: 65 ksi Compression Side Plate Stress: 5.1 ksi TIA G
Single-Rod B-eff: 3.14 in Allowable Plate Stress: 45.0 ksi m*Fy
Compression Plate Stress Ratio: 11.4% > s;s comp. Y.L. Length:
Stiffener Data (Welding at Both Sides) No Prying 22.78
Confg: 0 Tension Side Stress Ratio, (treq/t)A2: 14.0% ?
Weld Type:
Groove Depth: in n/a
Groove Angle: degrees Stiffener Results
Fillet H. Weld: Disregard Horizontal Weld : n/a
Fillet V. Weld: in Vertical Weld: n/a
Width: in Plate Flex+Shear, fb/Fb+(fv/Fv)A2: n/a
Height: in Plate Tension+Shear, ft/Ft+(fv/Fv)A2: n/a
Thick: n Plate Comp. (AISC Bracket): n/a
Notch: in Pole Results
Grade: ksi Pole Punching Shear Check: n/a
Weld str.: ksi
Pole Data
Diam: 12 in
Thick: 0.375 in
Grade: 35 ksi
# of Sides: 0 °0° IF Round'
Fu 63 ksi c
Feint Fillet Weld 0 "0" if None ,
c
' 0 = none, 1 = every bolt, 2 = every 2 bolts, 3 = 2 per bolt
" Note: for complete joint penetration groove welds the groove depth must be exactly 1/2 the stiffener thickness for calculation purposes
CClplate 1.5 - Ext Flange G 1.3, Effective March 19, 2012 Analysis Date: 4/19/2012
Stiffened or Unstiffened, Exterior Flange Plate - An Bolt Material TIA Rev G
Reactions Bolt Threads:
Site Data Mu 33.63 Tkips X-Excluded
BU#: 806579 Axial, Pu: 1.12 kips cpVn= (0.55*Ab'Fu
Site Name: NYCutchogue Shear, Vu: 4.68 1kips =0.75, *Vn (kips):
App 145544 Rev. 2 Elevation: 100 feet 40.50
Pole Manufacturer: Other If No stiffeners, Cntena: TIA G <-Only Applicable to Unstiffened Cases
Flange Bolt Results i on-Rigid
Bolt Data Bolt Tension Capacity, (p*Tn,B1: 56.81 kips cp'Tn
Qty: 12 Ad'usted lp*Tn (due to Vu=Vu/Qty), B: 56.81 kips cpTn[(1-(vu/(pvn)-2]-o.5
Diameter (in.): 1 Bolt Fu: 125 Max Bolt directly applied Ti 5.13 Kips
Bolt Material: Other Bolt Fy: 105 Min. PL "tc" for B cap. w/o Pry: 2.289 in
Strength (Fu): 125 ksi Min PL "tred" for actual T w/ Pry: 0.524 in
Yield (Fy): 105 ksi Min PL 11" for actual T w/o Pry: 0.688 in
Circle (in.: 25.75 T allowable with Prying: 39.53 kips 05a'51 case
Prying Force, q: 0.00 kips
Plate Data Total Bolt Tension=Tu+q: 5.13 kips
Diam: 28.5 in Prying Bolt Stress Ratio=(Tu+q)/(B): 9.0% Pass
Thick, t: 1.75 in
Grade (Fy): 50 ksi Exterior Flange Plate Results Flexural Check Non-Rigid
Strength, Fu: 65 ksi Compression Side Plate Stress: 4.1 ksi TIA G
Single-Rod B-eff: 3.89 in Allowable Plate Stress: 45.0 ksi W'Fy
Compression Plate Stress Ratio: 9.2% P,s Comp. V.L. Length:
Stiffener Data eldin at Both Sides) No Prying 21.28
Config: 0 Tension Side Stress Ratio, (treq/t)A2: 9.0% F:azs
Weld Type:
Groove Depth: in n/a
Groove Angle: degrees Stiffener Results
Fillet H. Weld: Disregard Horizontal Weld : n/a
Fillet V. Weld: in Vertical Weld: n/a
Width: in Plate Flex+Shear, fb/Fb+(fv/Fv)A2: n/a
Height: in Plate Tension+Shear, fUFt+(fv/Fv)A2: n/a
Thick: in Plate Comp. (AISC Bracket): n/a
Notch: in Pole Results
Grade: ksi Pole Punching Shear Check: n/a
Weld str.: ksi
Pole Data
Diam: 14.5 in -
Thick: 0.1875 in
Grade: 65 ksi
# of Sides: 12 "0" IF Round
Fu 80 ksi
Reinf. Fillet Weld 0 "0" if None
0 = none, 1 = every bolt, 2 = every 2 bolts, 3 = 2 per bolt
Note: for complete joint penetration groove welds the groove depth must be exactly 1/2 the stiffener thickness for calculation purposes
CClplate 1.5 - Ext Flange G 1.3, Effective March 19, 2012 Analysis Date: 4119/2012
• Mat Foundation Analysis
NY Cutchogue, BUM 806579
2012775.806579.01
GPD GROUP
Code >-..TIA-222-G Qxmax 2.69 ksf 1.2D+1.6W
Bearing On Sol Qymax 2.69 ksf 1.2D+1.6W
Foundation Type Mono Pad Qmax@45' 2.69 ksf 1.2D+1.6W
Pier Type Mound Qi.n G... 8.37 ksf
Reinforcing Known Yes Controlling Capacity 322% Pass
Max Capacity 1.1
III SUNNI 11i
FS(ot)x 2.09 21.0 0.9D+1.6W
Moment, M 3352.710667 k-ft FS(ot)y 2.09 i1.0 0.9D+1.6W
Axial, P 40 k Controlling Capacity 48.0% Pass
Shear, V 46 k
P
M
Pier Diameter,0 6 ft V
Pad Length, L 20.5 ft HIS
Pad Width, W 20.5 ft
Pad Thickness,t 4 ft
Depth, D 10 ft D
Height Above Grade, HG 2.. ft
t
Rebar Fy 60 ksi L"W
Concrete Fc' 3.5 ksi y
Clear Cover 3 in
Reinforced Top & Bottom? Yes
Pad Reinforcing Size #8 i
Pad Quantity Per Layer 18
Pier Rebar Size #11
Pier Quantity of Rebar 24 I K
Soil Type Cohesive
Soil Unit Weight 115.5 pcf I - - - - - -
Cohesion, Cu 2.5 ksf
Bearing Type Net
Ultimate Bearing 10 ksf
Water Table Depth 52 ft
Frost Depth 4.17 ft
GPD Mat Foundation Analysis - V3.01
W
W W
V! 0
W -
J 0 a
H
I-
0 K 2 o ~
ow
~LL
TOM ~w
N~ L 2 r
veri2NLn wireless
U
U 12
z N Z w z w
W WEST NYACK, NEW YORK U W ~`cp
O LL' U
z W
O O LL d N N
7 r r Q t0
N o 0
z
WIRELESS Ca COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY
W W W K w K K LL
Y LL O N
C CUTCHOGUE 2 fA e
Q ° F y c a
21855 COU :OU NTRY ROAD EAST (C.R. 48) J ¢ f
K O v
U z r
z
cum CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 O w z Q'Q
wo Q N U s co
w z U m
> z 0 w w
LIST OF DR.AV a L) _ DRAWINGS LL a Q ~ D U
SITE INFORMATION T-1 TITLE SHEET & IN[ EET & INDEX w o
wim A-1 PLANS AND DETAI V Q ~ Yi oJ z Z U j
n VW SITE NAME: CUTCHOGUE m ND DETAILS c~ G o o „ 8
VW SITE NUMBER: NY274 '°Illp , , pu nn° u ' ,rl „x O w =D u ~
PROJECT LOCATION: 132 SOUND AVENUE , n ~I m p~l~l 11 , ~ ! 1 ' i dlllr oi' 1 t ,iy iV uuw~u n lul'
MATTITUCK, NY 11952 , C-1 ANTENNA I O 41 O
SITE TYPE/DESCRIPTION: REPLACE (9) EXISTING ANTENNAS AT EXISTING LOCATIONS IIIIII 'lily' .CX pY/
4 D~ fo//
ADD NEW L I E UAdIII l IIN tXIb I IINU T ~ 1 ail ~ r 1~r lull I "III w 0
EQUIPMENT SHELTER ~~o~lalU' PIII~aiU'Pi 1, "1 1M I' iUvi t I~~i'I „ ;J 5 u u a ii X91 od 0 0
uun~wuw I nl Qr
BUILDING CONTACT. CROWN ATLANTIC II In 48 li w' llh~i '1"~~ni °
I "j, C"Iz rzlz Z
LEASING CONTACT: DICK WEYRHETTER I I I~, p l i p4 ' II 01 ~t1' i i i I' 5 Y U CJ
576 739-4629 I I I i pl ~ i ' I d iI'i1I IT, I h'i II'' ~~illl i ll~
~ II OCCUPANCY OR i
CONSTRUCTION CONTACT: PETE McCARTHY I1 ,I I'~, II i~ hi' I iiil I J ids ~ ii USE IS UNLAWFUL z ~
631 649-2730 III ' ~ ' I r o
' 'Uh ~I' ,P I' i V ,I, IT WITHOUT CERTIFICATE 0 w
(II,'~ 'I P~ i, li i'I~fl ENGINEER CONTACT. SCOTT M. CHASSE 'd III 'I Il ~Ij' I" II X111 ~P Il OF OCCUPANCY
850-663-1697 p „pllilu : n
'I Il ~q gyp' 1n II I 1 I it ICI ll ~I
LATITUDE 41'01'45.5" N P,i If II11 iil ,II 11
LONGITUDE 72'29'50.3" W nl 'm ~ i I I I Illy'. I,, I II '
I ELEVATION: 55'± AMSL a i II I i I it ,i " 1 ( V tzi' hl Ili,^ APPROVED AS NOTED
DISTRICT: 1000'' I 'A I i 1u DATEd7 n G'p #-2-7-:303
SECTION: 096 VIII i~ IN III III
u' . BLOCK: 001 Ill I~~I " In FEE5f'2! " BY Z
LOTS: 19.1 III I' ~1., u ~ I MMM NOTIFY BUILDING DEPA NT AT w ~2 0
ZONE: "LI" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 765-1802 8 AM TO 4 PM FOR THE LU K $e m FOLLOWING INSPECTIONS: LLI o r- s m U
Ill,il M~m 1. FOUNDATION - TWO REQUIRED 0e u 2 rvQi
T FOR POURED CONCRETE Z O F o 12
.°i piHlVl IFl ar : o'p ~ ~''Iglilllll n L'IIp i Igii 2 ROUGH - FRAMING, PLUMBING, K o ?
Ali„iPl ,I _ r I. Ip iudy9l Ili Illl M,i Ail 1 i~'i 11 li Ili h STRAPPING, ELECTRICAL b CAULKING z w 0` a 3. INSULATION J w
'unll ~lil Il;ji it p0 il, Illulul~l ~1 11, 'I~Itll~ ~ Elf n I7u III dl In, ~h ii W 13 4, FINAL - CONSTRUCTION 6 ELECTRICAL o z p a a
MUST BE COMPLETE FOR C.O. I- N :i
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET THE a' ^ 4
REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODES OF NEW Q YORK STATE. NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR
(LOCATION MAP N MAP VICINITY MAP DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION ERRORS.
NTS SCALE: 1" = 500' : OF NEW
11 CygS
ELECTRICAL sm w
INSPECTION REQUIRED
a. Oq b Bg03 y2
~y'"~i gDFE5510~P
mnwHHHHHHH61" "
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL
MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
CODES OF NEW YORK STATE.
EXISTING COMPOUND
ZONING TABLE: CUTCHOGUE "LI" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT ACCESS GATE(TVP 5PL) APPROVED FUTURE
~ LANDSCAPE .A '0 BUFFER W W
ITEM REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED Q a a
MAX. HEIGHT (FT) 80 -112 52 (1) NO z U) o
MIN. LOT AREA (SF) „ 40,000 45,589- NO. , REPLACE L v
MIN. LOT WIDTH (FT) 100 168,17- NO EXISTING LESSEE ~~60- a - a=~
MIN LOT DEPTH (FT) . 150 263.16- NO DIPS ANTENNAS MIIV[MUM FRONT YARD 100' *5± NO EXISTING . ~8 ELECTRIC METER ~ ~
MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK TBACK- ONE (FT)., 20 *1152=....... NO (T'P2-PL.) LESSEE GENERATOR w~) SIECOR FIBER Z W a
MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK - BOTH (FT). 40 45.1. NO., F- ? Q A JD VEDF it a Q a
MINIMUM REAR YARD SETBACK (FT) 70 *11 1L... NO.. JATTERY RACK ELEC ATS a
MAX LOT COVERAGE 30 45 62m*.. NO. EXISTING LESSEE S gATTERV RAC o G W o rc
Za C N m Z O O m w ENT EXHAUST i L, S 0 w
NA = NOT APPLICABLE NO = NO CHANGE ELECTRIC METER TAI EXISTING DIMENSIONAL NON-CONFORMITY LIL #97-423-144 N 00 N W +>Ij I~e_ FAN o z u
Q (1) TOTAL HEIGHT TO APPROVED FUTURE TOWER EXTENSION AND ANTENNAS ROAD C~ ROUTE 4U W F a m Z O O w LL -CABLE RACEWAY :SWAY ~ w
u Z W (9 10 ow o rc
u MOD MOD AC _ _ _ACK ACK r J
IppLE ROA - ' - J~3---- a,oe 40 c50 -----r~ wm
M u w z IX=102` EA w Z Ip r w HVAC CONTROLS 70NTROLS m z
S 25~ L u . I U m 0 - m Q DESK
N T Q C
( - 168.17 #222` I, ~ EXISTING LESSEE 12 PORT EN'TRV SIPS ANTENNA GP: GPS ANTENIVA ~l U VAC N
_ - I I ,ill O PANEL WITH (12) ANDREW HVAC EXHAUST VENT = U
I STING PROPERTY LINE I I COAX CABLES RUN IN METAL z n F
-Y=342, vHi DUCT FROM LESSEE SHELTER TO ' / 4 EXISTING MONOPOLE W w
.I
I I ?01 NOISE CERTIFICATION: I THE INSTALLATION OF THE NEW LTE CABINET J LTE CABINET IS WITH IN S K l
I I - _ - - R- r- . - R- "J THE CONFINES OF THE EXISTING EQUIPMENT: - - - - - EXISTING 105'-7%'m AGL AND WILL THEREFORE NOT CREATE ANY INOF 3 EQUIPMENT SHELTER z O
ATE ANY INCREASE IN u W FACILITY. U iV r
I EXIST I COVE EXISTING 24"X24" MONOPOLE NOISE LEVELS AT THE EXISTING FACILITY. COVERED CABLE
39IDG BRIDGE W/ (12) 7/g" (9) EXISTING LESSEE ALPHA, BETA, AND GAMMA K e ~e H o 0
u I+ COAX COAXIAL CABLES SECTOR PANEL ANTENNAS G. @ 105-7" AGL TO BE z o
I REPLACED W/ (9) NEW PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED U
TO EXISTING MASTS
I .TER PLAN Im I
COMPOUND PLAN s SHELTER PI
SCALE: 1"=10'-0" SCALE. l'-o" a O N
I 29 9".
I GRAPHIC SCALE fn o
I I to a Q ,0 20 0 Q o ~ y r~
N > a O
1 W W w J
X I IN FEET ) q o
N/F 1 Inch= 10 9 w O U 4
m HARRIS D EXISTING I = c °n
I H I ~ BUILDING LOT 181 I Z F rc > U O O W Z
tii N N L) o
APPROVED FUTURE CARRIER POLE W z U Y CID > z B 0° °w
'io' zG1 O N EXTENSION AND ANTENNAS
0 r N v~ o u ~ cai w
u`0i N 9 o zl (9) EXISTING LESSEE ALPHA, BETA, AND GAMMA Q OJ a0 =j
fJJI O V- SECTOR PANEL ANTENNAS r @ 105'-7" AGL TO
I m-+ I+ D I v - BE REPLACED W/(9) NEW PANEL ANTENNAS
- I MOUNTED TO EXISTING MASTS W 0
EXISTING MICROWAVE ANTENNA r
Oozz _ uLj
zZ (7p ~ I J AMPHENOL H w 0 °
n PAVED Q `n 1=n EXISTING 100 MONOPOLE AN4PHENOL BXA-701090/4CF (LTE) E m I' A 2'REVEAL AT BASE BXA-171090FdCF (PCS) M 10 U r w F
AREA I Q +I m WITH 112 0 U a F 11 OIbs
22 6 ISF m 204 SF m
m m
I I ~ ~ (~7 iv
k P c ~ ~ v (U 07
N z _ J a p J 7 J _ U' ? o
Z N Q Qr
W z o al a Q +I Q EXISTING FENCED COMPOUND
I ° O +I J O Z
EXISTING LESSEE 12'x26' ¢ W Q U m (0 rn O EXISTING LESSEE EQUIPMENT SHELTER u m I Y Y U U
I EQUIP ENT SHELTER W/ (2) - w = w m Q
GPS A TENNA & (2) %z' Q a p Q U N _COAXI LCABLES - f O w Q ~o w¢ o Z U N REPLACE EXISTING LESSEE m Z I ' GPS ANTENNAS (TYP 2-PL.) Q Q
w 1 6 1" p4l 4.1" , Z
00 Z Z U EXISTING LESSEE GENERATOR I FRONT TOP SIDE Z
III F w N g¢ z w N Q w w FRONT TOP SIDE FRONT EXISTING LESSEE (12) PORT ENTRY PANEL
PROVED FUTURE EQUIPMENT TO R=1105± z w a z w AP < Q z WITH (12) ANDREW COAX CABLES RUN
r J V O h z N¢ w K w ~ 1• IN METAL DUCT FROM LESSEE SHELTER pANELANTENNAS
O LL N ¢ Q x wi xx F N Q¢ 0 If Q f TO EXISTING MONOPOLE
I III F yy O l a> W z O ¢ (7 O w 1 EXISTING NEXTEL EQUIPMENT SHELTER i
p (5 ( F ? IT II EXISTING TELCO CABINET PCTEL
~I a-+ EXIST _ ~ a w N O X U w N EXISTING T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT PAD GPS-T 3 5-HR-2N
_ O MONO- ONOP X Z w z I
EXISTING M POLE W m
EXISTING 105-7Y,"' TO R=1425 - TO R AGL E r ~X m E I o Z/~/
n. MONOPOLE PROVED N2~~X YE w " V
15.2,.+ 1 . ~X 188.1' u' EXTENSION W/A1P j4 p0 X
EXIST W O°~m(Zj Y
L T- EQUIP, - J~ X Z o, 111
TO EXIST MOINO-% .X Sag
POLE TO N/F GPS ANTENNAS Z m O e w Oa J W
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD W OZDQa
XExlsr. EQUIP To R LOT 17.3 SITE PLAN REFERENCE:
iX 1 CUTCHOGUE SITE, NEW SITE PLAN AND DETAILS, COUNTY a NJaLL~
X ~X ROUTE 48, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW STRUCTURAL NOTE: a Y
SITE PLAN YORK PREPARED FOR NYNEX MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY REV 1, DATED 11/12/92 AS BUILT. PREPARED ~f / L \WESTERN ELEVATION PLEASE REFER TO STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
SCALE : 1 = 40'-0" BY EDWARDS AND KELCEY, INC. 70 SOUTH ORANGE L COMPLETED BY OTHERS. AVAILABLE UNDER SCALE : q6" = 1'A" SEPARATE COVER.
AVENUE, LIVINGSTON, NEW JERSEY 07039 2. DRAWING ENTITLED "PROPERTY SURVEY" PREPARED FOR i q~'C~ Y4 '
GRAPHIC SCALE A ANTENNA DETj IA DETAILS sm
GRAPHIC SCALE THE MTM DESIGN GROUP, INC. ON JUNE 4, 2009, tea PREPARED BY AREK SURVEYING COMPANY ie o 0 9 16 12 64
~o 0 Po ao eo 3. SITE MEASUREMENTS TAKEN BY APT ENGINEERING ON SCALE: /4' =1'-0"
01/10112 AND 01/16/12.
IN FEET ) -~'"aA~~FESSS P.
IN FEET) I Inch= 16 It MIJFri
I Inch= 40 1[
(LTE A-BLK~/)
ANTENNA DATA (LTE C-BLK)
EXISTING PLATFORM WITH (9; FORM WITH (9) MASTS o 0
EXISTING ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS
SECTOR MODEL QTY ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL STATUS CABLE AZIMUTH DOWN TILT DOWN TILT SIZE \ Z y
Z O a W LL o
ALPHA CELL: ADA-85408580CF 2 - 0` REPLACE (1)7/8' 102° PCS. ADA-85406580CF 1 - 0° REPLACE (2) 7/a' 102° x f a
(PCS/AWS) (CELL)
> T ~ r
BETA CELL ADA-85408580CF 2 - REPLACE (1)~/e' 222° PCS ADA-85408580CF 1 - REPLACE (2)7/8' 222' (CELL)
10° t o
10°
GAMMA CELL ADA-85408580CF 2 - REPLACE (1) 342° IX=102°~ =102°~ ; x~~ ? °z w
PCS ADA-85408580CF 1 - REPLACE (2)7/e' 342° I
0°
0° .h1111iv.°AYI1::11 till
GPS N/A 2 - - REPLACE (2) Y2" N/A
~ !tlll~~ll~r"1 EXISTING 1 EXISTING 100'-5" ~11~~ --~,t, (PCS/AWS) W z
PROPOSED ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS MONOPOI - MONOPOLE W/ ~'T
SECTOR MODEL QTY ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL NO. OF CABLE AZIMUTH ~ APPRO~ rI APPROVED 1)
DOWN TILT DOWN TILT CABLES SIZE ;S XTENSIO I XTENSION TO fit' 222 R W U w
ALPHA BXA-70090-4CF (CELLULAR) 1 - 1 REUSE EXISTING 115, (LTE A-BLIq - - _ 1 oe'-11"! 108-11"s AGL Z ~W
BXA-171090-SOF (PCS/AWS) 1 - 0° 1 REUSE EXISTING 115° (LTE C-BL 4q J - o d,yiu,
BXA-70090-4CF (LTE C-BLK) 1 - 0° 1 REUSE EXISTING 115° COMBINED WITH 850 (LTE A-BLIQ 1 (1) 7/61,
O M U
BETA BXA-70090-4CF(CELLULAR) 1 - S. 1 REUSE EXISTING 222' y=3a2-
BXA-1 71 090-8CF (PCS/AWS) 1 - 8° 1 REUSE EXISTING 222° BXA-70090-4CF (LTE C-BLK) 1 - 8' 1 REUSE EXISTING 222° / p o a F U <V lV
COMBINED WITH 850 (LTE A-BLK) 1 (1) i ~ c r
H O O N
GAMMA BXA-70090-4CF (CELLULAR) 1 - 3° 1 REUSE EXISTING 342° 2 0
BXA-171090-8CF (PCS/AWS) 1 - 3° 1 REUSE EXISTING 342' BXA-70090-4CF (LTE C-BLK) 1 - 3° 1 REUSE EXISTING 342° 0 O N M 4 U
COMBINED WITH 850 (LTE A-BLK) 1 (1) 7a' f ~ K ~ K
GPS N/A 2 - - 2 REUSE EXISTING 2 z
(2) RFS FTLBR5002 TRIPLEXERS TO BE INSTALLED ON ANTENN PIPE MASTS AT EACH SECTOR, (2) TOTAL TRIPLEXERS PER SECTOR CF2A1 : 4-LINES 3-ANTENNAS M4 (PCS/AWS) r a ~
O
U ~ (LTE A-BL4q Q o^ W
700-850 700-850 PCS-AWS (LTE C-BLIQ fA Cj a g
XPuOL XPXOL XPOL (n Lu
= J J W a r
V LU
(CELL) O W Z y}z v
i T O S W Z Q'Q
N U O a to
Al A2 A3 ~ (9) EXISTING LESSEE ALPHA, E SSEE ALPHA, BETA, AND GAMMA SECTOR Z O r
PANEL ANTENNAS 4 705 MOIL \S 4 9 105-7" AGL TO BE REPLACED W/(9) ? t7 Z y 00
• • • ,em, x.mm - -111 ADA-334X838X0F-EDIN ° "nn NEW PANEL ANTENNAS MOL VTENNAS MOUNTED TO EXISTING MASTS z O m W
4Yz ADA-8,94X858XCF-,EO1N IIIX ' LL a U
fnl FETPnncl I fi'Sre vLi'PG tl~I /FPV' FST Pbnel M,'WG^ I'J C'15d& j ANTENNA MOB NA MOUNTING DETAIL a Ls0
nonce .v uAmy rn°,.o ramw~ ~ MWH:Fl1 dvwl - Lowe Kiln
O O SCALE : l,_0„ 0 0 PCS-AWS z o m W F
~ ~ I w1m an - ° eenymin r W ptl Wlk ARA 1 0 0 Q r r 7
~N J v, mn ' ry u.e - 51a 0 0 v u N T - 0 O Z I
pl A~11111 L{ III n91 t1 9°EJY°~ I ee 11 IY• 5 'LIQ r r a 2~z.18
ew i^, ADA 85408580CF o 0 DIPLEXER DIPLEXER U U, oo'- Np H O N I
Y n21 = I6 1' _ 1 • ' (rl'P 6PL) WQT = 12,6# F xrnlvwl an •~3, •-~,d rvllrtl v,~ai 1 x-i o fel 7AC8BPA 7ACSBPA ~ p U ' F
U a u
Inn I bae Wnl nin n 13 PF+ h non eocw e , du NC nitre - w „ mOV) 11 6n sW, >o,~
ut tw,r t r 2wranv xN r n.,
mrclrprr - rm_'e _ nl V-4"/.,' q'
w m
.111WAo.+rrwwune',oelrnd Ib n.nf i. Ine 9^gnl*'I~rmn vrvl .h~ry,, _ la- 11~1 -el i D o
ud - .'JOq- sl sand )rka ' - - °a, seem r= sa - 1-ijll 1.11 1',- u Qr
1- as n 'l, ai ud a9. mnarxl lqe le tan. numml, onl. ,=I„i I r,,, 110 DIPLEXER DIPLEXER DIPLEXER DIPLEXER
e°,e ~ Z
:,xrlrt*ewraaw.na O O
OQ
/T ~ADA 63406380CF Y Y cl r wz
EXISTING FYP 3PL) WGT = 17# EXISTING STING 7A08B 7ACBB 7ACBBPA 7ACSBPA
¦/w~,, w (1)
a 0 0 3
PROPOSED 6ya' PROPOSED )POSED W v~
N a a
5%' 4Yt l
696-900 MHz ill F A.-70090-E01N-X SECTOR ALPHA BETA GAMMA
BASE COLOR WHITE BLWE GREEN
" " BXA-171690-8CF-EDIN-X BX 850 GRAY GRIAY GRAY
o Q 1Fitl6 TP I fEfP DU' 11 LTE-C RED REID RED
X'oll -EF PUgI 9U' JJhJ LTE-A. ORANGE ORIANGE ORANGE
51, K F Yll,s f , vx1 rx. 1 BXA 171 090-50F „e~uix PCS PURPLE PUFRPLE PURPLE AWS YELLOW YELLLOW YELLOW Z_
I.mnml + m I»M _ GPS BROWN > m ~ U
(TYP 3PL) WGT - 11 # - - m e w
f - FUTURE i w Y V o W
Zr nu i~a a I.'I AWS Z H I ~ F O ~ 2
s = _ FUTURE V w w 8 ^O
rmm rxnda(lan - ~ ' -0I 110 "'A Iloly ,onsrro - (i~SPLIT
fettnrw„1e111.,PW vgpu„ sq ry n y-~r IlAhnkQ 1 JV . PCS 850 LINE WITH FRAM FRAME FRAME FRAME FRAME w oc:W~ o Z ZO Q
I Li . r LIE : r „ eMPOI-I r" FRAME DIPLEXER r N J = LL
mmm C M1FSI nJ 6. fi, . ^~aw f0 n - - d M Y LL
T "Y l Y _ n 1 CI tl`MiiP rv'xYI I I+iN i _ ' ° .T Q
u m ti IfAI MICA 1 ° t _ F, Ill lL4yl'lWti~ E i'rk` J Vy¶RAT r N l A 6
u INH W11Mh a" R OAMI', ma^, ALPHA BETA, GAMMA ANTENNAS _ ayronm~F•N E4y i
9W YN,d'„I .r - 1 ',I -Itell 1\1 1@w,nl lFl fboht wnnlr - 4P' o M„inmruu u e. t. Y~9 0
Y1 BXA 70090-4CFIrq° x t _ plvfim m rc' - o w 16- 01, 3y ~Z ~N.gss '(j y~ F
QYP 6PL) WGT = 12# YMINYI eanra a -I - o, ° ~ , sun 2 COAX GABLE DIAGRAM w
SCALE : NTS
p m0 d 78
SIDE BY SIDE FE551~`~