The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About37383-Z ` y Town of Southold Annex 1/17/2014 P.O. Box 1179 54375 Main Road * Southold, New York 11971 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No: 36718 Date: 1/17/2014 THIS CERTIFIES that the building WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS Location of Property: 21855 CR 48, Cutchogue, SCTM#: 473889 Sec/Block/Lot: 96.4-19.1 Subdivision: Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this officed dated 5/23/2012 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 37383 dated 7/23/2012 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is: modification to an existing wireless telecommunications facility& add an equipment cabinet as applied for (Verizon) The certificate is issued to Junge, Arthur (OWNER) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO. 37383 1/16/14 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED Aut Zi�ature + z TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE �$© y SOUTHOLD, NY BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES WITH ONE SET OF APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) Permit #: 37383 Date: 7/23/2012 Permission is hereby granted to: Junge, Arthur 418 Moulton Hill Rd Lyman, NH 03585 To: modify an existing wireless telecommunications facility & add an equipment cabinet & complete the Planning Board landscaping requirements as applied for At premises located at: 21855 CR 48, Cutchogue SCTM # 473889 Sec/Block/Lot#96.-1-19.1 Pursuant to application dated 5123/2012- and approved by the Building Inspector. To expire on 1/22/2014. Fees: NEW COMMERCIAL, ALTERATION OR ADDITIONS $500.00 CO -COMMERCIAL $50.00 Total: $550.00 Buil ing Inspecto Form No.6 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN BALL 765-1802 APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY This application must be filled in by typewriter or ink and submitted to the Building Department with the following: A. For new building or new use: 1. Final survey of property with accurate location of all buildings,property lines, streets, and unusual natural or topographic features. 2. Final Approval from Health Dept. of water supply and sewerage-disposal (S-9 form). 3. Approval of electrical installation from Board of Fire Underwriters. 4. Sworn statement from plumber certifying that the solder used in system contains less than 2/10 of 1%lead. 5. Commercial building, industrial building,multiple residences and similar buildings and installations, a certificate of Code Compliance from architect or engineer responsible for the building. 6. Submit Planning Board Approval of completed site plan requirements. B. For existing buildings(prior to April 9, 1957) non-conforming uses,or buildings and "pre-existing"land uses: 1. Accurate survey of property showing all property lines, streets,building and unusual natural or topographic features. 2. A properly completed application and consent to inspect signed by the applicant. If a Certificate of Occupancy is denied, the Building Inspector shall state the reasons therefor in writing to the applicant. C. Fees 1. Certificate of Occupancy-New dwelling$25.00,Additions to dwelling$25.00,Alterations to dwelling$25.00, Swimming pool$25.00,Accessory building$25.00,Additions to accessory building$25.00,Businesses$50.00. 2. Certificate of Occupancy on Pre-existing Building- $100.00 3. Copy of Certificate of Occupancy- $.25 4. Updated Certificate of Occupancy- $50.00 5. Temporary Certificate of Occupancy- Residential $15.00, Commercial$15.00 Date. July 25,2012 New Construction: X Old or Pre-existing Building: (check one) Location of Property: 21855 C.R.48 Cutchogue House No. Street Hamlet Owner or Owners of Property: Arthur V. Junge Suffolk County Tax Map No 1000, Section 96 Block 1 Lot 19.1 Subdivision Filed Map. Lot: 3 3`� New Yor A Limite Partnership a Permit No. �S d Date of Permit. Applicant:Verizon Wireless Health Dept. Approval: Underwriters Approval: Planning Board Approval: Request for: Temporary Certificate Final Certificate: (check one) Fee Submitted: $ 50.00 Re,Niels Huber&Coughlin,LLP G 4S�r'1� By. nt : ture John J. Coughlin Attorney for Applicant,New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless pF SO �oUjyo Town Hall Annex yy Telephone(631)765-1802 54375 Main Road T 41 Fax(631)765-9502 P.G. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11 97 1-0959 � roger.richert(@town.soLithoId.ny.us coufm i� BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CERTIFICATE OF ELECTRICIAL COMPLIANCE SITE LOCATION Issued To: Venzon Address: 21855 County Rt 48 City: Cutchogue St: NY Zip: 11935 Building Permit#: 37383 Section: 96 Block: 1 Lot: 19.1 WAS EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE contractor: DBA: Costrotta Const Manag License No: SITE DETAILS Office Use Only Residential Indoor Basement Service Only Commerical X Outdoor H 1st Floor Pool New Renovation 2nd Floor Hot Tub Addition Survey Attic Garage INVENTORY Service 1 ph Heat Duplec Recpt Ceiling Fixtures HID Fixtures Service 3 ph Hot Water GFCI Recpt Wall Fixtures Smoke Detectors Main Panel A/C Condenser Single Recpt Recessed Fixtures CO Detectors Sub Panel A/C Blower Range Recpt Fluorescent Fixture Pumps Transformer Appliances Dryer Recpt Emergency Fixtures Time Clocks Disconnect Switches Twist Lock Exit Fixtures TVSS Other Equipment: LTE antenna swap Notes: Inspector Signature: V-a/ Date: Jan 16 2014 81-Cert Electrical Compliance Form.xls o�of SOON �1 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPT. 765-1802 INSPECTION [ ] FOUNDATION 1ST [ ] ROUGH PLEIG. [ ] FOUNDATION 2ND [ ] INSULATION [ ] FRAMING /STRAPPING [ ] FINAL [ ] FIREPLACE & CHIMNEY [ ] FIRE SAFETY INSPECTION [ ] FIRE RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION [ ] FIRE RESISTANT PENETRATION [ ] ELECTRICAL (ROUGH) ELECTRICAL (FINAL) REMARKS: DATE /G r INSPECTOR FIELD INSPEMONREPORT DATE COMMENTS U'ro $Ou"ATION(I MT) w s FOUNDATION(M) z 0 ROUGH FRAMING:& PLUMBING 7„ L INSULATION PER N.Y. y STATE ENERGY CODE FINAL IF IL, Li L� ADDITIONAL COMMENTS r c' S <. 5oa. — j Ve (� I <bisa-o 913 Ur� y� m i , n n i 3 awl I� L o z A d TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST BUILDING DEPARTMENT Do you have or need the following,before applying? TOWN HALL Board of Health SOUTHOL%NY 11971 4 sets of Building Plans TEL: (631) 765-1802 Planning Board approval FAX: (631)765-9502 Survey SoutholdTown.NorthFork.net PERMIT NO. 3-7 3 lie 3 Check Septic Form N.Y.S.D.E.C. Trustees Flood Permit Examined �3 •20/ Stone-Water Assessment Form_ Contact: Attorney for Applicant: Approved �3 20�2— Mail to; Re,Nielsen,Huber&Coughlin,LLP Disappro a/c 36 N.New York Ave.,Huntington,NY 11743 Phone: 631-425-4100 fixpiratio 20�`' .. zutilgInspector �� LICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT MAY 2 3 2012 Date Maq 20 l.Z INSTRUCTIONS BLDG.DEPT. This iMialifiakiTIALIST be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 4 sets of plans, accurate plot plan to sc e. ee according to schedule. b.Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises,relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and waterways. c.The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application,the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant.Such a permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e.No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Certificate of Occupancy. f.Every building permit shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date.If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property have been enacted in the interim,the Building Inspector may authorize,in writing,the extension of the permit for an addition six months.Thereafter,a new permit shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold,Suffolk County,New York,and other applicable Laws,Ordinances or Regulations,for the construction of buildings,additions,or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described.The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws,ordinances,building code,housing code,and regulations,and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless (Signature of applicant or name,if a nttl4lEt) Limited Partnership 4 Centerock Road,West Nyack,NY 10994 (Mailing address of applicant) State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent,architect,engineer,general contractor, electrician,plumber or builder Applicant is Lessee Name of owner of premises Arthur V. lunge limited partnership (As on the tax roll or latest deed) tc 1sd�roetfficerWJO t tte us lv (Name and title o9 aoerpotata Builders License No. Plumbers License No. N/A Electricians License No. Other Trade's License No. 1. Location of land on which proposed work will be done: 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue House Number Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section 96 Block 1 Lot 19.1 ' Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot r 2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy Commercial and public utility wireless telecommunications facility b. Intended use and occupancy Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility 3. Nature of work(check which applicable):New Building Addition Alteration Repair Removal - Demolition Other Work Lessee/Applicant propose to modify/upgrade its exisin public ti%wirele s tQ communj ations p@cili b e lacin Rine/9l gxistin a Ignnas withnine(9. 1 ,,` new ante das,re Y cn( two( )Ci� units witrft two(2/new G �unit ane msfallmg on ga�drttonal equipment c"ktfill>i�� '8kis[ing shelter. 4. Estimated�os Fee (To be paid on filing this application) 5. If dwelling,number of dwelling units N/A Number of dwelling units on each floor If garage, number of cars Commercial and public utility wireless telecommunications 6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy,specify nature and extent of each type of usefacility 7. Dimensions of existing structures,if any:Front Rear Depth Height Numbcrof Stories Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Rear t Depth Height Number of Stories S. Dimensions of entire new construction:Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories / 45,589 square feet 9. Size of lot: Front Rear Depth 10. Date of Purchase 4/6/1987 Name of Former Owner Timothy Scott Gray 11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated Light Industrial District 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law,ordinance or regulation?YES_NO X 13. Will lot be re-graded? YES—NO X Will excess fill be removed from premises?YES X NO_ 418 Moulton Hill Rd'. 14.Names of Owner of premises Arthur V.Junge Address Lyman.NH 03585 Phone No. 603-838-8982 Name of Architect APT Engineering Address 3 Saddlebrook Dr. Phone No 860-663-1697 Name of Contractor Addres\ t ragwort ,CT 06419 phone No. 15 a. Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES NO x * IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES &D.E.C.PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. b. Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland?* YES_NO x * IF YES,D.E.C.PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16. Provide survey,to scale,with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 17. If elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below,must provide topographical data on survey. 18. Are there any covenants and restrictions with respect to this property? * YES X NO * IF YES,PROVIDE A COPY. STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OFF IZ06.}- _ &4elm being duly sworn,deposes and says that(s)he is the applicant (Name of individual signing contract)above named, (S)He is the Lessee/Applicant - (Contractor,Agent,Corporate Officer,etc.) of said owner or owners,and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application; that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. Sworn to before me this day of '� ,I�G� 20 2 New York SMMJSA Limited -Partnership d/b/a Verizo_nn�1W,i_reless Notary Public Signature o Applicant Michael R.Bonhomme Notary public, State of New York Print Name/Title above No.01 B06144229 Qualified in Orange County Commission Expires 04/24/2ojf 373 S 5 ho�aoF sovTyo6 Town Hall Annex Jf * Telephone(631)765-1802 54375 Main Road y ��rrpaxx(63l))766��..g955QQ$g P.O.Box 1179 fO ier.richerldeo n.gouUlolq nV us Southold,NY 11971-0959 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL INSPECTION REQUESTED BY: z n 11 k Date: Company Name: Co trv{ tcL C� S C- On v�,av�q Name: o License No.: Address: q IJ 1 1 5 2 a Phone No.: JOBSITE INFORMATION: (*Indicates required information) *Name: C -4-CVA0!t j n k *Address: , t 43 Ste_C o- ✓t+ fZT y C' 4-+U1 Ltr t�1 *Cross Street: C *Phone No.: I Permit No.: Tax Map District: 1000 Section: Block: Lot: *BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORK(Please Print Clearly) I (Please Circle All That Apply) Is job ready for inspection: ES NO Rough In Final *Do you need a Temp Certificate: YES/ NO Temp Information(if needed) *Service Size: 1 Phase 3Phase 100 150 200 300 350 400 Other *New Service: Re-connect Underground Number of Meters Change of Service Overhead Additional Information: PAYMENT DUE WITH APPLICATION 82-Request for Inspection Form i( k G 5 �� FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY SITE PLAN USE DETERMINATION Initial Determination Date:- Date Sent: F f _I_1� Project Name: <T Project Address: CS" P �'�'�^'�`xP Suffolk County Tax Map No.:10001&_- - Zoning District:01 _ Request: A... (Note: Copy of Building Permit Application and supporting documentation as to proposed use or uses should be submitted.) Initial Determination as to whether use is permitted: Initial Determination as to whether site plan is required:YeA Signature of Building inspector Planning Department (P.D.) Referral: P.D. Date Received: / / Date of Comment: Comments: Signature of Planning Dept. Staff Reviewer Final Determination Date: / / Decision: sionnthirR of Rnildina InanHrtnr FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY SITE PLAN USE DETERMINATION Initial Determination . Date:_�/�5—/� mc, Date Sent: 5� fJ�� Project Name: Project Address: C ,4 Suffolk County Tax Map No.:10005 ' -�_- Zoning District:_ Request: (Note: Copy of Building Permit Application and supporting documentation as to proposed use or uses should be submitted.) initial Determination as to whether use is permitted: 'as Initial Determination as to whether site plan is required:�efS Signature of Building Inspector Planning Department (P.D.) Referral: P.D. Date Received: / a4 / I--- Date of Comment:_/ I L ✓� mments: ��2 �ci2 Qo1 • Qleo� sell 0.�� __. _ Sig ature o (anhhh( VrE Final Determination JUL 2 0 2012 Date: 0 7 BLDG.DEPT. IOWN OF SOOTHOLD Decision: Rinnahira nf Riii tti o Insn r MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS QF soar P.O.Box 1179 DONALD J.WILCENSKI hQ�� yQIO Southold, NY 11971 Chair y .1L OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS T T Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS G Q 54375 State Route 25 JAMES H.RICH III �O �� (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR lyCOUry 1,�`�,�' Southold, NY IY 1, Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector From: Brian Cummings, Planner Date: July 20, 2012 Re: Proposed Verizon Wireless LTE upgrades @ Junge SCTM#1000-96:1-19.1 As an addendum to the attached SPUD report, please be advised that the landscaping requirement detailed in the approved April 6, 1992 site plan (Verizon formerly known as "Nynex"), remains outstanding. It is recommended that the completion of the landscaping requirement be included as a condition to the issuance of a building permit for the proposed modifications and upgrades. QTY. Scientific Name Common Name Size/Root Spacing 13 Pinus Strobifiirmis *Mexican Border Pine 5'-6' H 10' o.c. 6 Pinus Nigra Austrian Pine 5'-6' H 10' o.c. 4 Pinus Montana Mugho Pine 18"-24" 6' o.c. Mu us *"Mexican Border Pine"may be supplemented with(Picea Pungers, Colorado Blue Spruces) depending on the availability of plant materials at implementation. Thank you for your cooperation. pF SOUTyolo Town Hall Annex y Telephone(631)765-1802 54375 Main Road T Fax(631) 765-9502 P.O. Box 1179 -1W Southold,NY 1 1 971-0959 Own BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 10, 2014 Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin LLP 36 N. New York Ave Huntington, NY 11743 Re: 21855 CR 48, Cutchogue TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The Following Items(if Checked)Are Needed To Complete Your Certificate of Occupancy: / Application for Certificate of Occupancy. (Enclosed) ✓ Electrical Underwriters Certificate. (Contact your electrician) A fee of$50.00. Final Health Department Approval. Plumbers Solder Certificate. (All permits involving plumbing after 4/1/84) Trustees Certificate of Compliance. (Town Trustees#765-1a92) Final Planning Board Approval. (Planning#765-1938) Final Fire Inspection from Fire Marshall. Final Landmark Preservation approval. Final inspection by Building Dept BUILDING PERMIT: BP 37383 — Modify an existing Telecommunications Facility RE, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 36 NORTH NEW YORR AVENUE HUNTINGTON, NEW YORE 11743 TELEPHONE: (031) 425-4100 FACSIMILE: (031) 425-4104 Or G.v..Ei WILLIAM J. NIELSEN Mav 23. 2012 By Hand Mr. Michael Verity Building Department town of Southold Annex Building 54 375 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 RF.: New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon' ) Proposal to modify existing telecommunications facility at Premises: 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, New York SCTM#: 1000-96— I — 19.1 Dear Mr. Verity: \kc are the attorneys for Verizon in connection with its proposal to upgrade its existing facility at the subject premises. The modification proposed is part of Verizon "LTE" project which will allow Verizon to provide better, faster and more reliable service in the Town. l he Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, codified at 47 United States Code §1455, a copy of which is enclosed, provides that "a State or local government may not deny, and shall approve, any eligible facilities request for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station." This proposal is an "eligible facilities request" pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §1455(a)(2) as it proposes only to replace and collocate certain transmission equipment. Specifically, Verizon proposes to replace nine (9) existing antennas on the existing monopole with nine(9) replacement antennas at the same height as presently existing, replace two (2) 6PS units on the existing equipment shelter with two (2) new GPS units, and install additional equipment inside its existing equipment shelter. As such, we respectfully submit that the proposed modification will not "substantially change the physical dimensions" of the existing monopole or base station. Morco\-er, the Telecommunications Act of 1996, codified at 47 United States Code § 332, as interpreted by the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") in its Declaratory Ruling 09-99 and Order On Reconsideration 10-144, requires that applications such as Verizon's be processed within 90 days. We enclose the following in support Of tile proposed eligible facilities request: I. Town of Southold Building Permit Application form detailing the eligible facilities request; 2. Owner's Authorization Affidavit; 3. Building Permit Application fee: Check of Re, Nielsen, Huber & Coughlin LLP (Check No. 1325) in the amount of$500.00: RE, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 36 NORTH NEW YORE AVENUE HUNTINGTON, NEW YORR 11743 TELEPHONE: (631) 425-4100 FACSIMILE: (631) 425-4104 OF GOUNSEL WILLIAM J. NIELSEN July 25, 2012 By Hand Mr. Michael Verity Building Department Town of Southold Annex Building 54375 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 RE: New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon") Proposal to modify existing telecommunications facility at Premises: 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue, New York SCTM#: 1000— 96— 1 — 19.1 Dear Mr. Verity: On behalf of Verizon, and pursuant to your office's request, we enclose, herewith, the following documents: 1. Application for Certificate of Occupancy; and 2. Our firm's check number 1381 in the amount of$50.00, which amount represents the required Certificate of Occupancy fee. We respectfully request that our office be notified once the Building Permit is issued so that we may pick up same from the Town. c Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain v` 3��3 1�� b4c)q Very truly yours, RE, NIELSEN, HUBER & COUGHLIN, LLP By: ohn . Coughlin JJC:mk Enclosures New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless Proposal to modify existing facility at 21855 C.R. 48, Cutchogue May 212012 Page 2 of 2 4. Two (2) counterparts of Antenna Site FCC RF Compliance Assessment and Report prepared by Pinnacle Telecom Group and dated March 27, 2012, demonstrating the project's compliance with the FCC's Maximum Permissible Exposure regulations; 5. "Iwo (2) counterparts of Structural Analysis Report with design drawings, prepared by GPD Group, dated April 19, 2012, documenting the facility's structural compliance with local, state and federal codes; 6. Copy of Verizon's FCC Licenses; 7. Copy of Deed; 8. Copy of Lease Supplement between Crown Atlantic Company LLC and New York SMSA Limited Partnership, dated March 31, 1999; 9. Copy of Verizon's Certificates of Occupancy Nos. Z-24388 and Z-24389, both dated May 30. 1995; 10 Copy of Verizon's Planning Board Resolution, dated April 7, 1992 approving Amended Site Plan Application; I I. Copy of Verizon's Board of Appeals Resolution, dated December 5, 1991.. together with copies of Board of Appeals Decisions Nos. 4058 and 4062, both dated November 21, 1991. 12. Copy of property survey prepared by Arek Surveying Company, dated June 4, 2009; and 13. Four (4) sets of Construction Drawings with Site Plans and Elevations. prepared by ATP Engineering, dated April 6, 2012. We respectfully request that the instant proposal be processed in accordance with the above and that the appropriate Permit be issued at this time. We respectfully request that our office be contacted when the Permit is ready to be picked up. We can be reached at(631) 425-4100. Very truly yours, RE, NIELSEN, HUGER & COUGHLIN, LLP BN: In, ou hlin JC:mk Enclosures Cc via e-mail w/o encls.: Ms. Heather Lanza, Planning Director 01/09/2014 18 :45 FAX /0001/005 RE, NIELSEN,HUBER& COUGHLIN,LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 36 North New York Avenue Huntington,New York 11743 (631)425-4100 Telecopier (631) 425-4104 TELECOPY TO THE FOLLOWING NUMBER: 631-765-9502 TO: Ms,Connie Bunch Town of Southold Building Department RE; New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless("Verizon") Request for Extensions of Time relating to Building Permit Nos.: ■ 37382—Southold Police Station— 165 Peconic Lane,Peconic(75—5— 14.1) ■ 37383—Arthur lunge property—21855 C.R.48,Cutchogue(96—I —19.1) ■ 37384—Orient Fire District— 23300 Main Road,Orient(18—5— 13.8) FROM: Marisa Knoth DATE; January 9,2014 MESSAGE: Please see our attached correspondence and attachments thereto. TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES 5 (including Cover Page) PLEASE NOTE The information contained in this facsimile message is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual named above and others who have been specifically authorized to receive such information. If the recipient is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,or if any problems occur with transmission,please notify as immediately by telephone at(631)425-4100. Thank you. United States Code United States Code J TITLE 47-TELEGRAPHS TELEPHONES AND RADIOTFLEGRAPHS CHAPTER 13- PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM AUCTIONS J SUBCHAPTER IV-SPECTRUM AUCTION AUTHORITY 47 U.S.C. 5 1455. Wireless facilities deployment (a) Facility modifications (1) In general - Notwithstanding section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-104) or any other provision of law, a State or local government may not deny, and shall approve, any eligible facilities request for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station. 2) Eligible facilities request - For purposes of this subsection, the term "eligible facilities request" means any request for modification of an existing wireless tower or base station, that involves - (A) collocation of new transmission equipment; (B) removal of transmission equipment; or (C) replacement of transmission equipment. (3) Applicability of environmental laws - Nothing in paragraph (1) shall be construed to relieve the Commission from the requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act [16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.I or the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 [42 U.S,C,,332.1 of seq.!. (b) Federal easements and rights-of-way (1) Grant - If an executive agency, a State, a political subdivision or agency of a State, or a person, firm, or organization applies foe the grant of an easement or eight-of-way to, in, over, or on a building or other property owned by the Federal Government for the right to install, construct, and maintain wireless service antenna structures and equipment and backhaul transmission equipment, the executive agency having control of the building or other property may grant to the applicant, on behalf of the Federal Government, an easement or right-of-way to perform such installation, construction, and maintenance. (2) Application - The Administrator of General Services shall develop a common form for applications for easements and rights-of- way under paragraph (1) for all executive agencies that shall be used by applicants with respect to the buildings or other property of each such agency. 13) fee (A) In general - Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Administrator of General Services shall establish a fee for the grant of an easement or right-of-way pursuant to paragraph (1) that is based on direct cost recovery. (e) Exceptions - The Administrator of General Services may establish exceptions to the fee amount required under subparagraph (A)- (i) in consideration of the public benefit provided by a grant of an easement or right-of-way; and (ii) in the interest of expanding wireless and bice [band coverage. i41 Use of fees collected - Any fee amounts collected by an executive agency pursuant to paragraph (3) may be made available, as provided in appropriations Acts, to such agency to cover the costs of granting the easement or right-of-way. (c) Master contracts for wireless facility sitings (1) In general - Notwithstanding section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 or any other provision of law, and not later than 60 days after February 22, 2012, the Administrator of General Services shall - (A) develop 1 or more master contracts that shall govern the placement of wireless service antenna structures on buildings and other property owned by the Federal Government; and (B) in developing the master contract or contracts, standardize the treatment of the placement of wireless service antenna structures on building rooftops or facades, the placement of wireless service antenna equipment on rooftops or inside buildings, the technology used in ronnection with wireless service antenna structures or equipment placed on Federal buildings and other property, and any other key issues the Administrator of General Services considers appropriate. (2) Applicability - The master contract or contracts developed by the Administrator of General Services under paragraph (1) shall apply to all publicly accessible buildings and other property owned by the Federal Government, unless the Administrator of General Services decides that issues with respect to the siting of a wireless service antenna structure on a specific building or other property warrant nonstandard treatment of such building or other property. (3) Application - The Administrator of General Services Shall de.,eLop o common form or set of forms for wireless service antenna structure siting applications under this subsection for all executive agencies that shall be used by applicants with respect to the buildings and other property of each such agency. (d) Executive agency defined - In this section, the term "executive agency" has the meaning given such term in section 102 of title 40. ( Pub.L. 112-96, title VI, Sec. 6409, Feb. 22, 2012, 126 Stat. 232. 1 REFERENCES IN TEXT Section 7D4 of the Telecommunications Act of 195E, reterred to in subsecs. (a) (1) and (c) (1), is section 704 of Pub.L. 104-104, which amended section 332 of this title and enacted a provision set out as a note under section 332 of this title. The National Historic Preservation Act, referred to in subsec. (a) (3), is Pub.L. 89-665, Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 915, which is classified generally to subchapter II (Sec. 470 et seq.) of chapter lA of Title 16, Conservation. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 470(a) of this title and Tables. The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, referred to in subset. (a) (3), is Pub.L. 91-190, Jan. 1, 1970, 83 Stat. 852, which is classified generally to chapter 55 (Sec. 4321 at seg.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4321 of Title 42 and Tables. Copyright©2012 CCH Incorporated or its affiliates TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK : STATE OF NEW YORK -------- -------------------------------------------------------------X In the Matter of the Application of New York SMSA Limited AUTHORIZATION Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless OF OWNER At the premises: 21855 County Road 48 North side of County Road 48, west of Cox Lane Cutchogue, New York Section 96, Block 1, Lot 19.1 -----------------------------------------------------------------X STATE OF IIQ) ) SS.: COUNTY OF Arthur V. Junge, being duly sworn, deposes and says: I am the owner in fee of the premises known as Section 96,Block 1,Lot 19.1 (the"Premises" hereafter), and do hereby authorize New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ('Verizon Wireless' hereafter), and its representatives to bring such applications for municipal approvals as may be necessary for the upgrade/modification of its public utility wireless telecommunications facility. As such,I willfully cooperate with Verizon Wireless and its agents in obtaining any required Approvals. By. Sworn to before me this °" day of /�'1� , 2012 E%Via EXPiRSION ES CO) 1 AWUST 21. NOT ' Y PUBLIC =o'Z 201e �� NER COMMON DRIVEWAY DECLARATION THIS INDENTURE made this +�j day of ...rr Okaly, 2003,by Chris Mohr, residingst 147-6' SAC065 LftF- I SO11,iTfti-+0 !fNy- 11q ?/��_�I��'11 ��.ef, and Arthur Junge,residing at 4lq mou.1}a>J HI LL kA , LyMA•n1 r N,0A SLC 1 D3S YN� New York, hereinafter referred to collectively as the"Declarants". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS,Declarants are the owners of hums in the Town of Southold situate along the northerly aide of Route 48,Cutchogue said lands being bounded and described in Schedule A (Joseph Schoensteim), and B (Arthur Junge),said schedules being annexed hereto and made a pan hereof. WHEREAS,Declarants have agreed to emit a common driveway for the purpose of ingress and egress to the above-described parcels of the land and for the installation of utilities and all other lawful purposes in favor of these parcels,so that where will be a common access to serve both parcels;and WHEREAS,Declarants desire to provide for such shared driveway access to and from Colony Drive; NOW,THEREFORE,be it declared as tbllows: 1. The lots described above shall have a common driveway access to and from Route 48 over that portion of land described in Schedule C,said schedule being annexed hereto and made a part hereof.Such driveway shall replace any existing driveways,now wristing on the Mohr property described in Schedule A annexed hereto.The new driveway shall be located upon the Junge property along the property line contiguous to the Mohr property. 2. The use of the premises described in Schedule C shall be subject to the following restrictions: a. The lot owners shall have the joint,equal,and mutual right to use the private roadway described in Schedule C for the purpose of ingress and egress and placement of utilities. b. The terms"lot owner`or"lot owners"as used in this Declaration, shall be deemed to include any hare,distributeea,successors, or assigns ofthe particular lot owner or lot owners. I Page I of lot owner and his/her heirs,distributem, successors,and assigns,all of the conditions, obligations, i restrictions,and provisions of this Declaration. d. The word 'maintenance, as used in this Declaration,shall be deemed to mean all costs and expenses in connection with said private roadway, including the costs of sweeping, resurfacing, regravelling, filling in of holes,and all those items necessary to make it convenient � and safe for the owners of the aforesaid lots to use the private roadway described in Schedule C. e. After the initial installation of the driveway at the sole cost of lunge, or his successor shall determine what maintenance or improvements shall be done on the road and the amount or money to be expended therefor. The owners orthe lots shall be responsible for equal portions of maintenance. f. All lot owners agree that the roadway shall always be maintained so as to be passable by vehicles: both automobiles and tracks and this shall include prompt repair if any"potholes"or similar defects in the road which cause the roadway to become substandard. S. In the event either lot owner fail to pay their proportionate sham of maintenance expense within seven(7)days of notification of charges,such unpaid monies may be collected from the other lot owner. In this event, the lot owner having duly paid both their proportionate shares of expenses and those of the defaulting lot owner shall be deemed the contractor as defined in the New York Lien Law.The lot owner who has not paid Wier proportionate sham shall subject his/her real property to the lines or the lot owner who has paid his/her share of maintenance expanse. The lot owner who has paid their proportionate sham of expenses may also commence an action against the defaulting lot owner,in a court of appropriate jurisdiction,in order to recover the unpaid monies. In any action commenced against a defaulting lot owner, there shag be a presumption that the maintenance work lbr which monies are owing was validly authorbed by the other lot owner and was competently performed by the contractor who did the work. A defaulting lot owner shall be liable nor all costs and expenses, including but not limited to attorneys fees which are incurred by the other lot owner in recovering the defaulting lot owner's unpaid share orexpenses. h. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein,each and every lot owner shall repair at histher sole cost and expense any damage done to the roadway by construction traffic, machinery,or other implements used in the construction of improvements on the particular lot owners land. Any failure to make or pay for such repair may be treated by the other lot owner as a default in the payment of maintenance expense, in accords=with subparagraph(g)above. 3. It is further agreed that a, the driveway shall be installod at the sole cost and expense of J unge or his successor in the interest in the property, Page 2 of 4 b. the width of the driveway shall remain 12 feet and shall not be widened without the written consent of Junge or his successor. c. the driveway shall be in conformance with all requirements of the Town of Southold but not be paved or otherwise improved with any type of impervious surface; d. the location of the driveway shall not be changed without the consent of both parties or their respective successors. 4. This declaration is binding upon all grantees, heirs, distributees,successors,or assigns of any portion of lards described in Schedule A and B above. S. This Common Driveway Declaration may not be revoked,rescinded, extinguished, modified or amended without the express written permission of a majority plus one of the Southold Town Planning Board or its logal wecessor,except that the provisions hereof which relate solely to the snaking or,repair or improvement decisions or the allocation of expenses among lot owners may be revoked or modified without such Board's approval. 6. Mohr makes no claim to have,at any time,any right,title,or interest in any part of the lends of lunge as set forth in Schedule A other then to the driveway created by this agreement in the area defined in Schedule C. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Dedarants have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and year first above written. V V `11 Arthur Junge Chris Mohr STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) On the day ofa d( inthe yew 2003 before me,the undersigned personally appeared Arthur Ju known to me or proved to me on tho basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual(s)whose namc(s)is(are)subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/shetthey executed the acme in his/her/their capacity(tes),and that by Page 3 of4 I the hedthcir Signature(s)e e the instrument, the individual(!), or the person upon behalrof which the individual(a)acted,executed the Instrument. Veronica F.Cidone , Notary Public,State of New York No:52-4601406 otary Public Qualified In Suffolk Courtly Commission Expires Dec.31 f< STATE OF NEW YORK) )ss.: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) On the day o in the year 2003 before MC, the undersigned personally appeared Chris Mohr personally eown to me or proved to me the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual(s)whose name(s)is(are)subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to the that he/sheAbey executed the same in his/her/their eapscity(iea),and that by his4w their signature(s)on the instrument,the individual(s), or the person upon behalrof which the individual(s)acted,executed the instrument. Veronica F. one Notary Nolo�toao4 York 68108 Dutdlf,ed In Suffolk Oou►ro( _/ 4Public Commission Expires Dec 31, Page 4 of 4 I I li I II I Illl II III I I II I II II I IIII I lllil III II I II II I[I I II II I IIIIII IIIII IIIII IIII IIII SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK RECORDS OFFICE RECORDING PAGE Type of Instrument: EASEMENT/DOP Recorded: 08/30/2001 Number of Pages: 4 At: 01:24:00 PM TRANSFER TAX NUMBER: 01-04375 LIBER: D00012139 PAGE: 075 District: Section: Block: Lot: 1000 096.00 01.00 019.001 EXAMINED AND CHARGED AS FOLLOWS Deed Amount: $0.00 Received the Following Fees For Above Instrument Exempt Exempt Page/Piling $12.00 NO Handling $5.00 NO COE $5.00 NO TP-584 $0.00 NO Notation $0.00 NO Cert.Copies $0.00 NO RPT $15.00 NO BCTM $0.00 NO Transfer tax $0.00 NO Comm.Pros $0.00 NO Fees Paid $37.00 TRANSFER TAX NUMBER: 01-04375 THIS PAGE IS A PART OF THE INSTRUMENT Edward P.Romaine County Clerk, Suffolk County • 1 1.. 2 1 Numbar of pages �gr,�iR=E. TORRENS '`l�• °'' '' `�'I "e Serial c'':: QF SLFF.KL, CWUh Y Certificate a " ,�,v.'r_.? P C'S Prim Clf.0 DTu C*144E75 Dead I Mortgage instrument Dead/Mfongago Tax Sump77r— Recording/Piling Stamps 4 FEES Page I Filing Fee �a"_ Mortgage Amt. _ Ems'. I Handling J I.Buic'Ibx 711-594 2.Additional Tux ' Notation Sub Total _ EA-52 17(County) Sub Total 17 — Spuc./Assn. rut-5217(Slate) Or _ Spec./Ada _ R.P.T.S.A. " Y TUT.I.f1'G.TAX Comm.of Ed. 5 OQ_ fry Dual Town,Dual County_ Held for Apportimrment County— Affidavit A TmuferTax Certified Copy Manslon'I'za The pmporly covered by this mortgage is or Reg.Copy will be improved by a one or two family Sub rout dwelling only. Other YPB__orNO GRAND TOTAL .3� If NO,see appropriate tae claum on page 0 —orlhis innmmtmt. Real Property Tax Smvice Ageney Verifreatim 6 C ornmustil I'mservaliun Fund D10. Sectitm Black f.m Conalduration Amount St #1000 096.00 01.00 OL9.001 C%PP"L'nx Dare S Q improved Vacant Land_., 7 Satistaaliuns/Discharges/Roleasea List Property Owners Mailing Addros TD RECORD&RETURN TO: 'I'll Verizon TD 501 North Ocean Avenue Patchogue, New York 11772 Room105 Now. Title Company InformationName !I 9 Suffolk County Recording &Endorsement Page This page tbrrns part Of the altx-W Easement V106723 -. .._—.- .. ..—mode by: Arthur V. J mge ISPF.'CTI•YTYPL'OFINSTRUMENI'1 Rein Street Orient. ff.. York MjY The prendses herein is siitnted in SUPI'OLIC COUNTY.NEW YOWL TO In*x1owsuhip of Socthold Verizon In the VILLAGIS SDI North Ocean Avenue or HAMI.FTof Cutchogue Patchogue. Nev York 1177 . Raom 105 \� BUXL•S 5't}IRU 9 MUST BE 1Y1r1;U UR PILIlQfF1)IN 1TLAC'K INK ONLY PR1UR TO RECORDING OR PILING. (OVER) Dear Taxpayer, Your satixfar lion of mortgage has been filed In nry n1lirr.and I all)enclosing Ilse original copy for your recurus. It s porlinn nl'vour nlouth�v 11101"tgage payment included your property taxes.yvu iv01 now need g l;',olij.UVj your local TownTax Iteceh rr sn thrrl yr a n�� hg., III•d dinr[ly lnr all hrwre orouettyyy� bills. Local prupe.rly tace.s are.enable. hvice a year: on or br,rfnre.lanuan, 10"'and on or belbre May 31 m Failure to ake payments h1 a tiuuly fashion could reanll in n penalty. Please contact your local Town Tax Receiver with any questions regarding property tax payment. la 1)vion Town rni xry Rev,�er or,ra Illverhead'town Renalver or Tres '200 LLIIEL SLuu]6C ID41WIAV ?.On Riwrll Arrnne.. Nnrth I.Intlenhnral, N.Y. 11767 Hiverhead, N.Y. 11901 (MI) 057 3004 1631) 727.3200 drouLkurven Town Receiver of Taxm Shelter Island Town Ilecelver of Taxes 250 Fast Main Street Shelter Island Town hall Port Jefferson. N.Y. 11777 Sheller island, N.Y, 11964 (6311 473-0236 (631) 7.19-31.18 Euat HmupLun Tuwn like.ivar of Taxes Sulitlltown'I'own RM viver Olt Inxea 300 Pantigo I'ltuxt 99 West Main Street East Hampton. N.Y. 11937 Smtthlthvtt, N.Y. 117HT (6311 324-2770 ("M I)360 1610 Huntinglon Town Receiver of Taxes Soulhampton'rowu Rceclver of Taxes 100 Main Sirmt I Iti lfatupton Road Huntington. N.Y. 11743 Southampton. N.Y. 11968 (631) 351-1217 (MI)283-6514 Islip Town Berelver of'Iltxes Southold Town Receiver of Tnxcs 40 Nnssau Avenue 53095 Main Stroel Islip, N.Y. 11761 Soulhold, N.Y. 11971 (631)224 5550 (A11) 755 1801 Sinecrcly, �J Edwurd P. W;?MI AC Suffolk Comity Clerk dw 2/99 r..rnw::uiav ROW 1 'l V106721 �,{�'y'�� //�/�''A 'I GRANT '► USEKENT, made thief_ day ofJQ ; 20�, � u 6etwaon ,nn / �( residing at l�(! !y) I t n(i P(1 lY�or7 j , (hereinafter referred to as -Grantor") to VRRIfON NEW YORK INC. (formerly known as New York Telephone Company), a corporation of the State of New York, having its principal office at 1095 Avenue of the Americas, New York, Now York (hereinafter referred to as -Orontes-). WHEREAS, the Grantor owns in foe a certain panel of land situated 0 DIST. 0100, BBC. 096.00 BLX. 01.00, LOT. 019.001, in the County of S•• k_, State of Now York, am Shown on EXHIBIT ",J_-, attached hereto and hereby made pert of this Grant. NOW, THEREFORE, WITEESSBTH, i ►IRM That for and in consideration of the sum on One Dollar ($1.00) in hand paid by the Grantee to Grantor, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantor grants unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns, the right, privilege and authority to construct, place, operate, replace, remove, repair and maintain service lines, including iburied cable, podestals, Conduits, manholes, poles and such crossarms, guys, stubs, ancbore, cables, wires and fixtures as the Grantee may from time to time damn necessary upon, ever, under and along the said land and ithe highways adjoining or upon said land, approximately as ahown on Exhibit ' a , together with the right of ingress and egress to exercise all of the rights herein granted and with the right to trim any trees and route along said lines, me reasonably necessary, to keep thin said facilities free and clear from interference on said land and said highways. SECOND, The exclusive and permanent right-of-woy and eavemant above described and heroin conveyed is intended to prohibit the longitudinal Or Parallel occupancy of said aaomment strip by others, including Grantor and to prohibit surface or subsurface Structures or othoxwLos of others, including Grantor, which might damage or interfere with the operation and maintenance of Orantea•o facilities without the prior written convent of Grantee, but is not intended to prohibit Crossing of said easement strip so long as such cnmmLngo do not interfere with or prohibit the full use of the easement heroin granted. Grantor agrees with the Grantes, on behalf Of himself, his successors and assigns, and as a covenant running with the land, that the grad. existing at the time of execution of thin grant of easement will remain undisturbed and unchanged. THIRD, The Grantor hereby grants unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns the right to permit the attachment of the communication and electric service wires and facilities of other utility Companies and to convey to much other companios an interest in the rights granted under this Grant. ►OGRRa! It is a condition of this Grant that each corporation receiving this Grant shall pay the cost of guarding adequately all excavations made by that corporation under this Grant and pay the cost to restore or repair any damage done by that corporation to the property of the Grantor while placing, replacing, relocating, Operating, repaLrLng, maintaining, renewing or removing its facilities, and shall save harmleas and indemnify the Grantor from any injury to its proporty, its employees or the public which may At any time occur through the negligence of that corporation. Grantor has duly executed this grant the day and year first above written. 6ALkrV witness Arthur V. lunge If/ TN(..(e ^ !, - t_` L.B. Witness Antionette Fehie �I ' I V106773 ROW 2 IIaTATR Or NEW YORK ) COUNTY O 6 oa ) On the aI day of in the year a00I before m, the u de Dig f�a�e J, personally appeared personally known to am or proved to m On the basis of a tiafactory vldence to bs the individual(e) whose nsme(s) is tars) subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to m that hs/she/they executed the sees in his/her/their capacity, and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the lndivldual(s), or the person upon behalf Of which the individuals) cted, executed the Iinstrumnt. I Notary Public ` II 1 � II II (I II it i V a Iwo V106723 CSC CA(31N67 PLACE CAGLE.IQ VECIZ,00 WaLESS coou 1 U& 4IL--1 3 2b4- O GNFIr,r.r ri:( {I �21855 <i. �1i 0 I- � ;1 T �I MAP OF: Zl855 Cou.17Y 2Lb 48 KEY 1000-096 -00-01-00-D19-001 PROPOSED LOCALITY: CuTcr4o&uE �G� TOWN OF: SourHocp UuDEC�@a..1D CA3tb COUNTY OF: SUFFOLK STATE OF:.NEW YORK EXHIBIT "A 6_0 c PLEASE RETURN TO:NEW VM TSLEpNONE 00. 301 NO.OCEAN AVE ,•.i;1110:; Y.'Gddi: PATC11000E,N.Y.11171 3� Ae31� ATT.RM SUPV. :�-ea0y d p.anp3 MdA 03;iGi3C • a �. 11519P�5'79 � � �'. ^ RFM �rtidf � 1JUj AU6 14 ;•wJ l � j iknla��i�� Inx i V108114 5UiM!K tW1MT)OF iMO)Of�wT,' /_Wan this F day of UM •e ,fl.trt._X.�L(/LL d: corporatism with !b Principal i ottlw at [t/S�ss� d4Q .0 r.� u• thereinafter referred to a "ersawfin to M Yang M-N-0gs M, Mt, a scrporstim of the Items of Man Toth, having Its Primelpal Office out 1001 Avowa of the Aweless, mew Tork. gw Verb (beretwttor referred to a "arantee"). so VM MMO the orator Was in fN a captain carml of land dt"ted Cocslderatlon,ts the town of Southold to Lim oOeety of Suffolk, State of gas Tarh, es oboes 'us gmblblt "A". attacked beret0 awl hereby sets part of this Grant. Win, TSfaut/osf, afvvxwmr I fUgTl That for said In ccsslderatian of the ar of One Galley, j 1$1.00) In had paid by the Orator to Grantor the receipt of *blob is b*rsby Di ST. ION acknowledged the Grantor Siesta eta the Grantee, Its monomers am &Asia", that right, PrIvllop mad authority to construct, plus, Operate, roplmes, so". 09s00 reaove, repair AM Maintain service llnem, Including buried amble, pedestals, candoits, manholes. Palos And soak croeNam, guys. stake, members, cables, ee e,d j ILK. 0100 mir fixtures as Grantee my teen ties to time do= manometry Open, over, uddor mad along the said tad ad the bighvya NUOISIng Or MOM aid ! LOT 1t lad, mpproxlantOly an @base as Srbibit "A", together with the right of issrees ' aid ngreus to exercise all of the debts herslm Srantwl and filth the right to �rla✓�� ;-trim ear trust ail recta along said Items, es tea&Ansbly WOsasarf, te keep the G 'said cables ants virus trio cad slow tree fotsrfer@aao as add 1rN sod said hlsbways. 1 g moms The exclusive and permanent right-of-war and saaoanst OWN o Hsorlbod and ho"ia amesy*d is imt*edOd to pebibit the tooSltudisal or j 9 perdlel Occupancy of said same t strip by others, including Greeter W to Prohibit surface or absstface structures or otherwise of others, Including Grantor, which *tight damage our Interfere with the operation ad maintenance of i Gre"a" 0 fmeilttlee without the prier Orlttes oonsest of Gr&Ates, but Is not latendmd to Prohibit arousing of aid sommsant strip go leag as amok crossing do sot loterfers with or prohibit the full use of the went hotels grated. Grater agreee with the Grants, an behalf of himself, his nuooepeen set "Aigum, and an a covusat Wowing with the land, that the $ride $sitting at the time of "mention of this great of *Moment will rommlr uetisturhed unchanged. it is understood and Id. be- or that the above nctsd coetltioa we not intended to, ncr do they nstrlat or prevent Grantor from i '.Pt&Atag V-tap, curbing Parking late said Isadmeaplas. TMIRM The Grantor hereby grata unto the orates, its sucasomps mad amata" the right to permit the attao' & of the communication aM electric anises wlrom ad facilities� ofy(het utility commits and to oosvy ' to seek other companies a lstanst ts'the rights granted ceder thin arat. KNEW It tp eandlkiom of this arast that orates *ball pay . the met of gaardimg adohadmly all Oxaavatlama oak by Grantee @Mar this Grant and Pay the cast to rentore or repair ay damage dean by the Grantee to the property of the Granter While PIWng, rplmelng, rolosaking, operating, repslring, melntsimleg. removing or remevlse Its facilities, ad awl esvo beeml*sm and Ir,daasUP the Granter teem any lmjWj to its property, Its employees or the public which my at asp time occur through the wogllgunoo Of i the grantee. �� IS giTeged IIGGI ►, Grantor ban 04ROW this Instrument be be duly i G*mt" under cal the dy and fop first time written. thur Y Jungs to {� a L.S. xl '� Arthur V. JunSO. own r - �- RIOR Wk ` OOP. COY- pFF RBFCECFUEI If,IBTALLE9 TO 'L00' R FROM MONOPOLE CENTER • `\g9 \ sN1EL.O LiQHT F�sp7LlIfN6 //— - .. O ,' I 1 ONT.O ADJACENT ERI1 y Q PAWN CALCULATJM - - EXISTING BUILDING 40' K NM' - 4.000 S.F. II LOl ZOd [NFiRp.1E pR/11Y p4Ks-� PROPOSED RADIO EQUIPMENT BUILDING 112 R 26.1 - 312 S.F. I F wff EXISTING BUILDING USE,' 1 F MECHANICAL CDNTRACTOR'S BUSINESS 1.600 S.F 1 ' '• - ' f' CATERER I.200 S.F / S eYfT3MG nPeEa uLOY II` REPAIR GARAGE I.E00 S.f . �.' .-•a\ .. -'~',• }•. Ea3.w .{.. I _ PROPOSED UNMANNED�EWIPMENT'4-r�u•ELTER 312 S.F. YELLAM.LIN43 - !7 - IGNELTER REQUIRES INFItfiOUENT EWIPMENT . . . . '.r MAINTENANCE'VIST3. APPROXIMATELYVI9T PER MONTH.I I F A+_.,Zee�AYO�LiM1J� PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS PER USE, 1 "ft•�• - { 4 _ DELINEATE .I I MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR'S BUSINESS - I SPACE/EMPLOYEE PLUS 2 SPACES - PA ,GPACES I - /—'I.Y NEL 14.- 10.x RICMG' [, I CATERER PLUS SPACE/ENPLGYEE PB 2 SPACES NN-DIEL TE0 VL f 1 l 'PARKING SRACEB _ I REPAIR GARAGE • 4 SPACES/BAY PLUS I SPACE/EMPLOYEE 1'1 /�1.IMII"X I OLOCR' LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES • GREATER OF I SPACE/EMPLOYEE OR Y R1 1 LOF A9./ S I 1 SPACE/500 S.F. REWIRED PARKING SPACES- 1 / MECIC CONTRACTOR'S 5 EMPLOYEES X I SPACE/EMPLOYEE • 5 r RA I P' 1tEF NtrGG � l$ MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR'S F 2 SPACES • 2' R CATERER, 2 EMPLOYEES X I SPACE/EMPLOYEE 2 - 2 SPACES 2 N , REPAIR GARAGE, i I BAY X 4 SPACES/BAY - 4 . F I ryry O 1 -2 EMPLOYEES X I SPACOEMPLOYEE- 2 It R1141 ( i - 1 1 I7 j EQUIPMENT SHELTERS I I EMPLOYEE % I SPACE/BWM.OYEE a I 1 1 TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING SPIU (t 4_ 1 .ES - IB P4141 r PARKING-SPACES PROVIDED STANDARD STALL'40' X 20' a IS - " PARKING SPACES PROVIDED NANDICAUTED STALLS 12.8' X 20' - 'B LBT 17.5 1 - - -,;�:. ( f w'I .� k' E TOTAL PARKING SPACES PeDNF.S; IR - - our •-,� ( ' � - T �/ ` ;'\ � ( / ��.. .• is �`L^l.: l' .. - 34•-m \ ui.o:. - -ne' aPoltlNtR r(EYE.) `--nPt•u�n'LMrl+nl FLterMYc Rem a.Vwlevcwo . 'If M Js _ p OW,• JE- PROPOSED &Qr ,1jl�(I PITH PARKING M AZ 3 [ SIIRWY.INFORMATION BASED ON. •MAP OF PLANT MATERIALS PROPERTY SURVEYED FORARTHUR V, JUNGE. INC.' PREPARED BY RODERICK VAN TUYL, L.S. USE Dry. •CHORE¢IMIE t'aMRA IIRIE R13/II>TT Aw NO. 2E620 DATED 0/23/80 AND LAST __ REVISED Z/14/69. •� 13 wIM OIM3 P11pRP NE[ICYI IAMG PNE 3•-6'/e•P N' 4�C. tm TrSFi@pTAB PRMS M14M UFRIN1LBL K 1.�LTF�R ,,Qe E�O 1-IE481 4 eRUM" ANA wIRM°IrrcHOGu°E.VTOR°rY"o�Yw°r)'TiaLD. xEwYORKr� E COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LOT MFS • 45.599 S.F. a I-.04 AL.S - •NOIC, RMAY K WPLEKINiO RffN R IPICEA PNMEA3. COL➢RXW KITE SPRYCEI 3 MINI.IIA.xE AVA.M oP PLART wMlA.AT uNLRAR.R.A.pN. CUTCHOGUE SITE ZONE DATA LI LIGHT IN UOTRIAL SITE PLAN EXHIBIT REQUIRED PROVIDED VIDED COUNTY ROUTE 48, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 5 9S SUFFOLK COUNTY. NEW YORK LLOT OT 111 H 40.000 3F .Y68:SF FRONTEFYAflD 50 52- DATE OCTOBER IB. 1991 SIDE YARD 20 149• [ �XDS BOTH SIDE YARD ITO- - SCALE AS SNOMN 0REAR YARD TO 24M• K�Er• A • SETBACKS FOR PROPOSED NYNEX RADIO EQUIPMENT Q 11/19/91 REVISED PER PLANNING BOARD COMMENTS GMG NO 92-BO12 BUILDING ' REv. NOA GATE D2scRIPnoN R I C H A R D E L P:9.1110. 0 61i A 8 7—7 SHEET I OF I TAX LOT #17.5 N/0/F TOWN OF SOUTHOLD QQQQ 11 l p0.1� 2.2'NW N 23014100 E F E C E C A I N L I N STORAGE BIN 10.9 'SW 10. 4.0'NW 17.7'SE 8.6'SE MONOPOLE STY GRASS - -----. METAL k FRAME ......165'............... .. .........�.... . . � 1 in .�1..�.. �-------------_--- '-Z-- -' -�- GRASS iL W Of Of g z� W zli' _ Zip / GATE z CIoa ti 0 ,I}� APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 00 11_ : VERIZON EASEMENT GA ar QI ( I (RECORD-EXIBIT "A" V105786) 9 3,SW .��../✓�� v 1 > y l - C'V a I I a II . UNDERGROUND VERIZON o NAREL£SS CONDUIT (RECORD-EXIBIT "A" V106723) N ca I 00 Lie Z A S P H A L T P A R K I N G TAX LOT #19.1 EDGE OF ASPHALT II AREA: 13.1'SW3 n N 10 45,589 Sq.F. „ a I N 1.0465 Acres I }�I ;o a I • ; ASPHALT PARKING ROO -------------------- , ` ____ 14.85'SW t05.15 #22155 1 > I1 1 < Icn t10'CONCRETE FRAME i ;21855 I 3 ,a T I rf 1 nl w 3 W W I 1 1 STY H > 1 METAL I _ w I II (AUTO SHOP) i a 105.15' I Nl" . _ NQ In lin o � X -- _ _ ------ _____ O aZIJ O F Mr'60 3 U <z a I* a, Z OfTAX LOT /20.1 r <- l�-t p .I Y �) F 1lO N/O/F CHRISTOPHER MOHR O ' U Ii _ 5� .._._ _.� V1A OW V/ w0 I o G R A S S 3 as S Z w GRASS z 11 I En ul '(ACTUAL) iIWOOD CURB o z 7 (t750' (DEED) I : N � LILCO z 115N TILITY POLE t UTILITY POLE #420 �/ $421 CONCRETE C RU B 168-17' ¢,:.......ELEC. CON S 2505213011 W DUIT 120' WIDE) ROAD (MARK-OUT) MIDDLE NOTES: (C.R.-48) 1. THE OFFSETS OR DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON, FROM THE PROPERTY LINES TO THE STRUCTURES ARE FOR A SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND USE THEREFORE THEY (NORTH ROAD ARE NOT INTENDED TO MONUMENT PROPERTY LINES OR TO GUIDE THE ERECTION OF FENCES, ADDITIONAL STRUCTURES OR ANY OTHER IMPROVEMENTS. 2. CONSULT WITH THE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT BEFORE DESIGNIl ALUNG OR MODIFYING ANY NEW OR EXISTING CUREIS. WALKS OR ROADWAYSI'INT THE STREET SHOWN HEREON. 3. SUBSURFACE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON WAS BASED ON VISUAL OBSERVATIONS, VARIOUS CITY DEPARTMENTS, AND/OR PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES RECORDS, AND/OR UTILITY MARKOUT. THIS SURVEYOR ACCEPTS No RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY OF THIS DATA. I - - SURVEY (1 PIM F PFRTY LCATED O AT: SUBSURFACE UTILITIES ARE NOT CERTIFIED AS TO THE ACCURACY AND/OR COMPLETENESS. 21855 C.Rr48, CUTCHOGUE 4. ALL SUBSURFACE UTILITY LOCATION AND DEPTH SHOULD BE RECHECKED AND TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL GRADES SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH THE TOPOGRAPHICAL BUREAU, PREFERABLY IN WRITING BEFORE COMMENCING FINAL DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK 5. WATER S TCOURCESn FY THAT THERE AM N THIS IN THE PROPERTY SHOWN ON THIO MSiMF SµSURVEY' S OR NATURAL 6. REFER TO ARTICLE 36 OF THE GENERAL BUSINESS LAW AND THE PROVISIONS STATE OF NEW YORK OF INDUSTRIAL CODE PART (RULE NO. 53) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION OR DISTRICT ....... 1000, SECTION ....... 96 DEMoUTION IS COMMENCED. THESE LAWS REQUIRE EACH EXCAVATOR TO GIVE BLOCK 1 , LOT(S) 19.1 ADVANCE NOTICE TO ALL OPERATORS OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES OF HIS ....... ......• INTENT To PERFORM EXCAVATION OR DEMOLITION IN THE SPECIFIED AREAS 7. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN U.S. STANDARD MEASUREMENTS. 8. EASEMENTS NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED. REVISIONS DESGRIPTtON PrIB� OAE FtE V t '�(D 1. PROPERTY SURVEY AS CO. -04-0 AS(b9112 �Q..��a my copies from the original of this survey marked with an riginal of the lend surveyors embossed seal shall be 'w n onsidered to be valid true copies. SURVEID �/ Q �ti?, nouthorized alteration or addition to a survey map bearing ARKADIUSZ JUSHEGA. P.L.S. TP9r r�- licensed land surveyor's seol is a violation of section 7209, ub—division 2, of the New York State Education Law. %`�. ..L. ertification indicated hereon signify that this survey was repored in accordance with the existing Code of Practice AREK SURVEYING COMPANY p�� L� �SOrJU n C J� or Land Surveys adopted by the New York Stale Association �l.de: _ zn CO 0 ar 7 f Professional Land Surveyors. Said certifications shall run 58 East Beverly Parkway ` ' JAN niy to the person for whom the survey is prepared, and on NY 11580 Job No: is behalf to the title company, governmentat agency and Volley Stream, - �p .� ending institution listed hereon. and to the assignees of the www.aseny.net ASC-09112 Ill DESIGN GROUP. Inc. ending institution. Certifications are not transferable to TEL: 516 792-6676 dditional institutions or Subsequent owner. PINNACE TELECOM GROUP Professional and Technical Services rd�cowdrag ANTENNA SITE FCC RF COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT ANd REPORT PREPAREd FOR NEW YORk SMSA LiMiTEd PARTNERShip d/b/A VERIZON WiREIESS aCUTCOqU E #274" SITE 21855 COUNTRY ROAd EAST CUTCNOCUE, NY MARCh 27, 2012 14 RidGEdAIE Avenue - SuiTE 209 0 CedAR Knolls, NJ 07927 • 973-451-1630 CONTENTS INTROdUCTION ANd SUMMARY 3 ANTENNA ANd TRANSMISSION DATA 5 COMPLIANCE ANALYSIS 8 COMPLIANCE CONCIUSION 13 CERTIFICATION 14 APPENdIX A. BACICGROUNd ON THE FCC MPE LIMIT APPENdIX B. SUMMARY OF EXPERT QUALIFICATIONS 2 INTROdUCTION ANd SUMMARY At the request of New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon Wireless"), Pinnacle Telecom Group has performed an independent expert assessment of radiofrequency (RF) levels and related FCC compliance for the modification of an existing wireless base station antenna operation on an existing monopole at 21855 Country Road East, Cutchogue, NY. Verizon Wireless refers to the site as "Cutchogue # 274" and the antenna modifications are proposed so Verizon Wireless can effectively operate under its licensed frequencies including 700 MHz, 850 MHz, and 1900 MHz. The FCC requires wireless system operators to perform an assessment of potential human exposure to radiofrequency (RF) fields emanating from all the transmitting antennas at a site whenever antenna operations are added or modified, and to ensure compliance with the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limit in the FCC regulations. In this case, the monopole supports other existing wireless antenna operations by, Sprint-Nextel, T-Mobile, AT&T and MetroPCS — the RF effects of which will be included in this compliance assessment. This report describes a mathematical analysis of compliance with the FCC MPE limit for safe continuous exposure of the general public. The RF effects of the antennas are calculated using a standard FCC formula — and the analysis is designed to conservatively overstate the RF levels that actually occur from the antennas. In that way, as long as the results indicate RF levels below the MPE limit, we can have great confidence the compliance requirement is satisfied. The results of a compliance assessment can be explained in layman's terms by describing the calculated RF levels as simple percentages of the FCC MPE limit. If the reference for that limit is 100 percent, then calculated RF levels higher than 100 percent indicate the MPE limit is exceeded, while calculated RF levels consistently lower than 100 percent serve as a clear and sufficient demonstration of compliance with the MPE limit. We will also describe the overall worst-case calculated result via the "plain-English" equivalent "times-below-the-limit factor". 3 The result of the FCC RF compliance assessment in this case is as follows: ❑ The conservatively calculated maximum RF level from the combination of the Verizon Wireless antenna operations, as modified, along with all the other antenna operations at the site, is 1.5621 percent of the FCC MPE limit — well below the 100-percent reference for compliance. In other words, even with the significant degree of conservatism incorporated in the analysis, the worst-case calculated RF level is still more than 64 times below the FCC limit established as safe for continuous human exposure to the RF emissions from antennas. ❑ The results of the calculations provide a clear demonstration that the RF levels from the combination of proposed and existing antenna operations at the site satisfy the applicable criteria for controlling potential human exposure to RF fields, and the RF levels will be in clear compliance with the FCC regulations and limit concerning RF safety. Moreover, because of the conservative methodology and incorporated assumptions, RF levels actually caused by the antennas will be even less significant than the calculation results here indicate. The remainder of this report provides the following: ❑ relevant technical data on the Verizon Wireless antenna operations as modified, along with data on the other existing antenna operations at the site; ❑ a description of the applicable FCC mathematical model for assessing MPE compliance, and application of the relevant technical data to that model; and ❑ the results of the analysis, and the compliance conclusion for the site. In addition, Appendix A provides background on the FCC MPE limit, along with a list of FCC references on compliance, and Appendix B summarizes the expert qualifications of the author of this report. 4 ', ANTENNA ANd TRANSMISSION DATA The table below provides the key compliance-related data for the Verizon Wireless antenna operations, as proposed to be modified, at the site. r General Data Frequency Bands 700 MHz, 850 MHz and 1900 MHz Service Coverage Type Sectorized Antenna Type Directional Panel Antenna Centerline Height AGL 105 ft. in _ n � 700 MHz Antenna Data011 Antenna Model Antel 70090/4CF Antenna Maximum Gain 13.1 dBi RF Channels per Sector 1 Transmitter Power/ RF Channel 40 watts US 850 MHz Antenna Data � E V. 'gF'p 4 .y-t'E R "qi :3x ; L d.ix s.• ..nm '...u.. ..mv_'.. Antenna Model Antel 70090/4CF Antenna Maximum Gain 13.1 dBi RF Channels per Sector 8 Transmitter Power/ RF Channel 20 watts d 1900 MHz Antenna Data �� 4 Antenna Model Antel 171090/8CF Antenna Maximum Gain 16.6 dBi RF Channels per Sector 4 Transmitter Power/ RF Channel 16 watts __...- .:.. ._:-ro .. ... - ._: .m.:. ...__.. .: Note that in the analysis, we will conservatively ignore the power-attenuation effects associated with the antenna cabling ("antenna line loss".) The antenna vertical-plane radiation pattern is used in the calculations of RF levels at ground level around a site. Figures 1 through 3 that follow show the vertical-plane radiation patterns of the antenna model proposed by Verizon Wireless. Note that in this type of diagram, the antenna is effectively pointed at the three o'clock position (the horizon) and the relative strength of the pattern at different angles is described using decibel units. 5 Figure t.Antel BXA 70090/4CF Antenna—700 MHz Vertical-plane Pattern 0 deg —{l— horizon 1 5 dB/dMsion Figure 2.Antel 7009014CF Antenna—850 MHz Vertical-plane Pattern 0 deg horizon I 5 dB /dMsion 6 Figure 3. BXA 171090/8CF Antenna—1900 MHz Vertical-plane Pattern i 0 deg horizon i l 5 dB/division As noted at the outset, there are other antenna operations at the site that we need to include in the compliance assessment, each of which involves directional panel antennas arranged for sectorized wireless service coverage. In the analysis for each of the wireless carriers, we will conservatively assume operation with maximum channel capacity and at maximum transmitter power in each of their respective FCC-licensed wireless frequency bands. Sprint-Nextel is licensed to operate in both the 851 and 1900 MHz frequency bands. In the 851 MHz band, Sprint-Nextel uses as many as 12 RF channels per antenna sector and a maximum antenna input power of six watts. In the 1900 MHz band, Sprint-Nextel uses as many as six RF channels per antenna sector, with a maximum of 16 watts of transmitter power per channel. T-Mobile also known as Omnipoint) is licensed to operate in the 1900 MHz and 2100 MHz frequency bands. In the 1900 MHz band, T-Mobile uses a maximum of eight RF channels in each antenna sector, with a maximum transmitter power of 20 watts per channel. In the 2100 MHz band, T-Mobile uses two channels per sector, with a maximum of 40 watts of transmitter power per channel. 7 AT&T is licensed to operate in the 700, 850 and 1900 MHz frequency bands. In the 700 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as four RF channels per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 40 watts. In the 850 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as eight RF channels per antenna sector and a maximum transmitter power of 20 watts. In the 1900 MHz band, AT&T uses as many as four RF channels per antenna sector, with a maximum of 16 watts of transmitter power per channel. MetroPCS is licensed to operate in the 2100 MHz frequency band, using as many as three RF channels per antenna sector with a maximum transmitter power of 24 watts per channel, and using one RF channel per antenna sector with a maximum transmitter power of 60 watts. COMPHANCE ANALYSIS FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin 65 ("OET Bulletin 65") provides guidelines for mathematical models to calculate the RF levels at various points around transmitting antennas. At street-level around an antenna site (in what is called the "far field" of the antennas), the RF levels are directly proportional to the total antenna input power and the relative antenna gain in the downward direction of interest — and the levels are otherwise inversely proportional to the square of the straight-line distance to the antenna. Conservative calculations also assume the potential RF exposure is enhanced by reflection of the RF energy from the ground. Our calculations will assume a 100% "perfect' reflection, the worst-case approach. The formula for street-level RF compliance calculations for any given wireless antenna operation is as follows: MPE% _ 000 *TxPower* 10(Gmax-Vdisc/10) *4 ) /( MPE *471 * RZ ) where MPE% = RF level, expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit applicable to continuous exposure of the general public 8 100 = factor to convert the raw result to a percentage TxPower = maximum net power into antenna sector, in milliwatts, a function of the number of channels per sector, the transmitter power per channel, and line loss 10 (Gmax-vdiscno) = numeric equivalent of the relative antenna gain in the downward direction of interest, referenced to any applied antenna mechanical downtilt; data on the antenna vertical-plane pattern is taken from manufacturer specifications 4 = factor to account for a 100-percent-efficient ground reflection, and the squared relationship between RF field strength and power density (22= 4) MPE = FCC general population MPE limit R = straight-line distance from the RF source to the point of interest, centimeters The MPE% calculations are performed out to a distance of 500 feet from the facility to points 6.5 feet (approximately two meters, the FCC-recommended standing height) off the ground, as illustrated in Figure 4 below. antenna height from antenna bottom to 6.5' above ground level 0 500 Ground Distance D from the site Figure 4. MPE% Calculation Geometry 9 d that the farther away one is from an antenna the lower It is popularly understood y , the RF level — which is generally but not universally correct. The results of MPE% calculations fairly close to the site will reflect the variations in the vertical- plane antenna pattern as well as the variation in straight-line distance to the antennas. Therefore, RF levels may actually increase slightly with increasing distance within the range of zero to 500 feet from the site. As the distance approaches 500 feet and beyond, though, the antenna pattern factor becomes less significant, the RF levels become primarily distance-controlled, and as a result the RF levels generally decrease with increasing distance, and are well understood to be in compliance. FCC compliance for a collocated antenna site is assessed in the following manner. At each distance point along the ground, an MPE% calculation is made for each antenna operation, and the sum of the individual MPE% contributions at each point is compared to 100 percent, the normalized reference for compliance with the MPE limit. We refer to the sum of the individual MPE% contributions as "total MPE%", and any calculated total MPE% result exceeding 100 percent is, by definition, higher than the FCC limit and represents non-compliance and a need to mitigate the potential exposure. If all results are consistently below 100 percent, on the other hand, that set of results serves as a clear and sufficient demonstration of compliance with the MPE limit. The following conservative methodology and assumptions are incorporated into the MPE% calculations on a general basis: 1. The antennas are assumed to be operating continuously at maximum power, and at maximum channel capacity. In addition, the effects of antenna line loss are ignored wherever possible. 2. The power-attenuation effects of shadowing or other obstructions to the line-of-sight path from the antenna to the point of interest are ignored. 3. The calculations intentionally minimize the distance factor (R) by assuming a 6'6" human and performing the calculations from the bottom (rather than the centerline) of each operator's lowest-mounted antenna, as applicable. 10 4. The potential RF exposure at ground level is assumed to be 100-percent enhanced (increased) via a "perfect' field reflection from the intervening ground. The net result of these assumptions is to significantly overstate the calculated RF exposure levels relative to the levels that will actually occur— and the purpose of this conservatism is to allow very "safe-side" conclusions about compliance. The table on the next page provides the results of the MPE% calculations for each operator, with the worst-case result highlighted in bold in the last column. 11 Ground Verizon Verizon Verizon Sprint- T-Mobile AT&T Distance Wireless Wireless Wireless Nextel MPE% MPE% MPE%MetroPCS Total MPE% 700 MHz 860 MHz 1900 MHz MPE% MPE% MPE% MPE% 0 0.0016 0.0409 0.1064 0.0438 0.0015 0.0499 0.0105 0.2546 20 0.0037 0.0103 0.0587 0.1507 0.0334 0.1620 0.0021 0.4209 40 0.0070 0.0277 0.0007 0.0818 0.0334 0.1604 0.0562 0.3672 60 0.0264 0.1318 0.0070 0.1080 0.0736 0.1836 0.2372 0.7676 80 0.0168 0.0860 0.0186 0.0795 0.1089 0.6024 0.0443 0.9565 100 0.0023 0.0018 0.0047 0.2148 0.1275 1.0282 0.0520 1.4313 120 0.0387 0.0991 0.0240 0.4101 0.0367 0.3339 0.0635 1.0060 140 0.0816 0.2690 0.0058 0.4241 0.0463 0.1071 0.0364 0.9703 160 0.0999 0.3613 0.0010 0.2879 0.0033 0.4010 0.0359 1.1903 180 0.0960 0.3472 0.0104 0.1207 0.1467 0.8096 0.0315 1.5621 200 0.0708 0.2618 0.0058 0.1027 0.1392 0.7022 0.0214 1.3039 220 0.0438 01620 0.0013 0.0893 0.0754 0.3880 0.0406 0.8004 240 0.0222 0.0823 0.0001 0.0614 0.0571 0.2028 0.0517 0.4776 260 0.0131 0.0495 0.0002 0.0573 0.0779 0.0939 0.0397 0.3316 280 0.0091 0.0337 0.0001 0.0793 0.1176 0.0784 0.0155 0.3336 300 0.0122 0.0411 0.0047 0.1333 0.1455 0.1422 0.0143 0.4933 320 0.0188 0.0635 0.0095 0.2033 0.1345 0.2818 0.0225 0.7339 340 0.0286 0.0964 0.0144 0.2723 0.1197 0.2505 0.0334 0.8153 360 0.0257 0.0867 0.0130 0.2440 0.0758 0.4143 0.0398 0.8993 380 0.0344 0.1186 0.0234 0.2966 0.0682 0.3729 0.0381 0.9522 400 0.0483 0.1668 0.0274 0.2686 0.0289 0.5680 0.0346 1.1426 420 0.0594 0.2099 0.0261 0.2944 0.0263 0.5163 0.0276 1.1600 440 0.0544 0.1921 0.0239 0.2689 0.0380 0.7424 0.0192 1.3389 460 9904 1 222 26 0.0200 0.2849 0.0348 0.6803 0.0177 1.3377 480 0! 72 0! 44 0.0181 0.2621 0.0320 0.6258 0.0122 1.2271 500 0.0723 0.2553 0.0078 0.2420 0.0295 0.5775 0.0112 1.1956 12 As indicated, even with the significant degree of conservatism built into the calculations, the maximum calculated RF level is 1.5621 percent of the FCC MPE limit—well below the 100-percent reference for compliance. A graph of the overall calculation results, provided below, probably provides a clearer visual illustration of the relative insignificance of the calculated RF levels. The line representing the calculated total MPE% results rises only slightly above the graph's zero baseline, and shows an obviously clear and consistent margin to the FCC MPE limit. COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT RESULTS 120 Normalized FCC MPE Limit Total MPE% Results W 100 IL 2 80 a 0 a 60 c m O 40 w 0 e 20 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 Distance (ft) COMpIIANCE CONCLUSION According to the FCC, the MPE limit has been constructed in such a manner that continuous human exposure to RF emissions up to and including 100 percent of the MPE limit is acceptable and safe. The analysis in this case shows that the maximum calculated RF level from the combination of the Verizon Wireless antenna operations, as modified, along with the other existing antenna operations at the site, is 1.5621 percent of the FCC MPE limit. In other words, the worst-case calculated RF level from the combination of antenna operations is more than 64 times below the limit established as safe for continuous human exposure to the RF em issions from antennas. 13 The results of the calculations provide a clear demonstration of compliance with the FCC MPE limit. Moreover, because of the conservative calculation methodology and operational assumptions we applied in the analysis, RF levels actually caused by the antennas will be even less significant than the calculation results here indicate. CERTIFICATION It is the policy of Pinnacle Telecom Group that all FCC RF compliance assessments are reviewed, approved, and signed by the firm's Chief Technical Officer, who certifies as follows: 1. I have read and fully understand the FCC regulations concerning RF safety and the control of human exposure to RF fields (47 CFR 1.1301 et seq). 2. To the best of my knowledge, the statements and information disclosed in this report are true, complete and accurate. 3. The analysis of site RF compliance provided herein is consistent with the applicable FCC regulations, additional guidelines issued by the FCC, and industry practice. 4. The new Verizon Wireless antennas, as detailed herein, like the original antennas, will not produce more radiation which will cause them to not be in compliance with the FCC regulations. Moreover, the combined RF effects from the antenna operations at this site are in compliance with the FCC regulations and limit concerning potential RF exposure. AV441*4 3/27/12 Danie ollins Date Chief lftofinicalOfficer 14 ApPENdIX A. BAckgROUNd ON TILE FCC MPE LIMIT FCC Rules and Regulations As directed by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the FCC has established limits for maximum continuous human exposure to RF fields. The FCC maximum permissible exposure (MPE) limits represent the consensus of federal agencies and independent experts responsible for RF safety matters. Those agencies include the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In formulating its guidelines, the FCC also considered input from the public and technical community—notably the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). The FCC's RF exposure guidelines are incorporated in Section 1.301 et seq of its Rules and Regulations (47 CFR 1.1301-1.1310). Those guidelines specify MPE limits for both occupational and general population exposure. The specified continuous exposure MPE limits are based on known variation of human body susceptibility in different frequency ranges, and a Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) of 4 watts per kilogram, which is universally considered to accurately represent human capacity to dissipate incident RF energy (in the form of heat). The occupational MPE guidelines incorporate a safety factor of 10 or greater with respect to RF levels known to represent a health hazard, and an additional safety factor of five is applied to the MPE limits for general population exposure. Thus, the general population MPE limit has a built-in safety factor of more than 50. The limits were constructed to appropriately protect humans of both sexes and all ages and sizes and under all conditions — and continuous exposure at levels equal to or below the applicable MPE limits is considered to result in no adverse health effects or even health risk. The reason for two tiers of MPE limits is based on an understanding and assumption that members of the general public are unlikely to have had appropriate RF safety training and may not be aware of the exposures they receive; occupational exposure in controlled environments, on the other hand, is assumed to involve individuals who have had such training, are aware of the exposures, and know how to maintain a safe personal work environment. The FCC's RF exposure limits are expressed in two equivalent forms, using alternative units of field strength (expressed in volts per meter, or V/m), and power density (expressed in milliwatts per square centimeter, or mW/cm2). The table on the next page lists the FCC limits for both occupational and general population exposures, using the mW/cm2 reference, for the different radio frequency ranges. 15 Frequency Range(F) Occupational Exposure General Public Exposure (MHz) (mW/cmz) (mW/cmz) 0.3 - 1.34 100 100 1.34 - 3.0 100 180/ F2 3.0 - 30 900/ Fz 180 / F2 30- 300 1.0 0.2 300 - 1,500 F/ 300 F/ 1500 1,500 - 100,000 5.0 1.0 The diagram below provides a graphical illustration of both the FCC's occupational and general population MPE limits. Power Density (mW/cm2) 100 Occupational --------- General Public 5.0 1.0 0.2 ------ O.3 1.34 31.0 30 300 1�500 100,000 Frequency(MHz) Because the FCC's WE limits are frequency-shaped, the exact MPE limits applicable to the instant situation depend on the frequency range used by the systems of interest. 16 The most appropriate method of determining RF compliance is to calculate the RF power density attributable to a particular system and compare that to the MPE limit applicable to the operating frequency in question. The result is usually expressed as a percentage of the MPE limit. For potential exposure from multiple systems, the respective percentages of the MPE limits are added, and the total percentage compared to 100 (percent of the limit). If the result is less than 100, the total exposure is in compliance; if it is more than 100, exposure mitigation measures are necessary to achieve compliance. Note that the FCC "categorically excludes" certain types of antenna facilities from the routine requirement to specifically (i.e., mathematically) demonstrate compliance with the MPE limit. Among those types of facilities are cellular antennas mounted on any type of tower, when the bottoms of the antennas are more than 10 meters (c. 32.8 feet) above ground. The basis for the categorical exclusion, according to the FCC, is the understanding that because of the low power and the directionality of the antennas, such facilities — individually and collectively — are well understood to have no significant effect on the human environment. As a result, the FCC automatically deems such facilities to be in compliance. FCC References on Compliance 47 CFR, FCC Rules and Regulations, Part 1 (Practice and Procedure), Section 1.1310 (Radiofrequency radiation exposure limits). FCC Second Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FCC 97-303), In the Matter of Procedures for Reviewing Requests for Relief From State and Local Regulations Pursuant to Section 332(c)(7)(B)(v) of the Communications Act of 1934 (WT Docket 97-192), Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation (ET Docket 93-62), and Petition for Rulemaking of the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association Concerning Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Preempt State and Local Regulation of Commercial Mobile Radio Service Transmitting Facilities, released August 25, 1997. FCC First Memorandum Opinion and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, released December 24, 1996. FCC Report and Order, ET Docket 93-62, In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, released August 1, 1996. FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields", Edition 97-01, August 1997. 17 ApPENdix B. SUMMARY of EXPERT QUALIFICATIONS Daniel J. Collins, Chief Technical Officer, Pinnacle 'Telecom Group, LLC Synopsis •39 years of experience in all aspects of wireless system engineering, related regulation, and RF exposure •Has performed or led RF exposure compliance assessments on more than 14,000 antenna sites since the new FCC rules went into effect in 1997 Has provided testimony as an RF compliance expert more than 1,300 times since 1997 •Accepted as an expert in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Pennsylvania and more than 40 other states, as well as by the FCC ............. Educ ation &B.E.E., City College of New York(Sch. Of Eng.), 1971 o M.B.A., 1982, Fairleigh Dickinson University, 1982 * Bronx High School of Science, 1966 Current Responsibilities: e Leads all PTG staff work involving RF safety and FCC compliance, microwave and satellite system engineering, and consulting on wireless technology and regulation Prior Experience: o Edwards & Kelcey, VP—RF Engineering and Chief Information Technology Officer, 1996-99 e Bellcore, Executive Director—Regulation and Public Policy, 1983-96 *AT&T(Corp. HQ), Director—Spectrum Management Policy and Practice, 1977-83 a AT&T Long Lines, Group Supervisor—Microwave Radio System Design, 1972-77 Specific RF Safety/ * Involved in RF exposure matters since 1972 Compliance Experience: e Have had lead corporate responsibility for RF safety and compliance at AT&T, Bellcore, Edwards& Kelcey, and PTG *While at AT&T, helped develop the mathematical models later adopted by the FCC for predicting RF exposure @ Have been relied on for compliance by all major wireless carriers, as well as by the federal government, several state and local governments, equipment manufacturers, system integrators, and other consulting/engineering firms Other Background., *Author, Microwave System Engineering(AT&T, 1974) •Co-author and executive editor, A Guide to New Technologies and Services (Bellcore, 1993) • National Spectrum Managers Association (NSMA)—former three-term President and Chairman of the Board of Directors; was founding member, twice-elected Vice President, a long-time member of the Board of Directors, and was named an NSMA Fellow in 1991 • Listed in Who's Who in the Media and Communication and International Who's Who in Information Technology * Published more than 35 articles in indust�gaggp=es� 18 I 0 Date: Ae,2012 GPD GROUP. Greg Guzzle GPD Group Crown Castle 520 South Main St.; Suite 2531 2000 Corporate Drive Akron, OH 44311 Canonsburg, PA 15317 (330) 572-2137 (724)416-2620 jcheronisftlAaroup.com Subject: Structural Analysis Report Carrier Designation: Verizon Wireless Co-Locate Carrier Site Number: 274 Carrier Site Name: Cutchogue Crown Castle Designation: Crown Castle BU Number: 806579 Crown Castle Site Name: NY Cutchogue Crown Castle JDE Job Number: 183351 Crown Castle Work Order Number: 482571 Crown Castle Application Number: 145544 Rev. 2 Engineering Firm Designation: GPD Group Project Number: 2012775.806579.01 Site Data: 21855 Country Rd., Cutchogue, NY 11935, Suffolk County Latitude 4101'46.57", Longitude -72°29'50.29" 100 Foot—Modified EEI Monopole Tower wl 8.5' Extension Dear Greg Guzzie, GPD Group is pleased to submit this "Structural Analysis Report" to determine the structural integrity of the above mentioned tower. This analysis has been performed in accordance with the Crown Castle Structural 'Statement of Work' and the terms of Crown Castle Purchase Order Number 458910, in accordance with application 145544, revision 2. The purpose of the analysis is to determine acceptability of the tower stress level. Based on our analysis we have determined the tower stress level for the structure and foundation, under the following load case, to be: LC7: Existing + Reserved + Proposed Equipment Sufficient Capacity Note:See Table I and Table II for the proposed and existing/reserved loading, respectively. The analysis has been performed in accordance with the IA-222-G ndard and all local code requirements based upon a wind speed of 120 mph 3-second gust, exposure ca egory C with topographic category 1 and crest height of 0 feet. We at GPD Group appreciate the opportunity of providing our continuing professional services to you and Crown Castle. If you have any questions or need further assistance on this or any other projects please give us a call. Respectfully submitted by: "k `WAi im-IT IS A 1/IOLAION dF LAIN FOR AM PERSON 10 ALTER THIS _;OC&ENT UNLESS HE IS �t/ ACTING UNOF.R THE I F pROFESSIONA :`71'MI OF A LICENSED avid B. ranger, P.E. f� I AIG'NFFt New York#: 071387-1 `cox �y1V,s,-A oat Fes,III 520 South Main Street.Suite 2531 .Akron,Ohio 44311 .330-572-2100.Fax 330-572-2101 .www.GPDGroup.com Glaus Pyle Schomer Burns and DeHaven,Inc.Akron.Atlanta.Cleveland.Columbus.Indianapolis.Louisville.Marion.Phoenix.Seattle.Youngstown Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012 100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/8.5'Extension Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 2012775.806579.01, Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1) INTRODUCTION 2)ANALYSIS CRITERIA Table 1 - Proposed Antenna and Cable Information Table 2- Existing and Reserved Antenna and Cable Information Table 3- Design Antenna and Cable Information 3)ANALYSIS PROCEDURE Table 4- Documents Provided 3.1)Analysis Method 3.2)Assumptions 4)ANALYSIS RESULTS Table 5- Section Capacity(Summary) Table 6—Tower Components vs. Capacity 4.1) Recommendations 5) DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES 6) APPENDIX A tnxTower Output 7) APPENDIX B Base Level Drawing 8)APPENDIX C Additional Calculations tnxTower Report-version 6.0.4.0 Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012 100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/8.5'Extension Structural Analysis CC/BU No 806579 Project Number 2012775.806579.01,Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 3 1) INTRODUCTION The existing monopole has 12 sides and is evenly tapered from 36" (flat-flat) at the base to 14.5" (flat-flat) at the top. It has three major sections, connected with slip joints. The tower is painted white and has no tower lighting. This tower is a 108.5 ft Monopole tower designed by EEI in August of 1991. The tower was originally designed for a wind speed of 80 mph per EIA-222-D. Modifications designed by PJF (Job#: 41704-152, dated 11/30/05) have been installed and were considered in the analysis. They consisted of installing modification plates to the pole shaft and adding anchor rods to the base plate. Modifications designed by GPD (Project #: 2010111.14 Rev. C, dated 8/18/10) have also been installed and were considered in this analysis. They consist of installing modification channels to the pole shaft, removing existing flat plate reinforcement on the pole, installing additional anchor rods to the base plate, and installing a concrete collar to the tower base foundation. The proposed 12' tower extension called out in these drawings was not installed was therefore not considered. The modifications designed by GPD (Project #: 2011111.18, dated 3/30/11) which consist of adding an 8.5' extension to the top of the tower were considered in this analysis. 2)ANALYSIS CRITERIA The structural analysis was performed for this tower in accordance with the requirements of TIA-222-G Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures using a 3-second gust wind speed of 120 mph with no ice, 50 mph with 0.75 inch ice thickness and 60 mph under service loads, exposure category C with topographic category 1 and crest height of 0 feet. Table 1 -Proposed Antenna and Cable Information Center Number Number Feed Mounting Line Antenna Of Antenna Model of Feed Line Note (ft) Level(ft) Elevation Antennas Manufacturer Lines Size(in) 3 Antel BXA-171090/8CF 100 104 6 Antel BXA-70090/4CF ------- - --- - -_ _ 6 RFS/Celwave FD9R6004 tnxTower Report-version 6.0.4.0 Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012 100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/8.5'Extension Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 2012775.806579.01,Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 4 Table 2-Existing and Reserved Antenna and Cable Information Center Number Number Feed Mounting Line Antenna Of Antenna Model of Feed Line Note Level(ft) Elevation Manufacturer (ft) Antennas Lines Size(In) 108 110 6 Kathrein 800 10504 12 1-5/8 1 _1 108 1 1 1 FT-Arm Mount[TA 702-3] 1 3/8 r 3 Ante[ I ADA-63406380CF 104 ---T - 6 Antel � ADA-85408580CF 100 100 — __ rPlatform Mount[LP 602_1]i1 1 F 3/8 1 -- Comsat RSI i A-18A24N-U 12 7/8 �J --- - _ ------ , 1 T-Arm Mount[TA 602-3] 3 Andrew I E15S08P80 90 90 3 Andrew 5S09P94 24 7/8 j 6 Andrew - TMBXX-6516-R2M 6 EMS Wireless RR65-19-02DP 82 r 12 Decibel DB845N65ZAXT -- $� Platform Mount[LP 305-1]I 12 7B 1 T Arm Mount[[A 602 3] 3 Allgon 7250.02 70 70 3 Kathrein -800 10121 12 7/8 3 Powerwave 7770.00 3 Powerwave LGP17205 6 Powerwave TTAW-0000112-001 -1 F --- — --- 30 30 1 Pipe Mount[PM 601-1] 1 1/2 1 j 1 Maxrad GPS-TMG-26NMS Notes: 1) Reserved equipment. 2) The existing equipment shall be removed prior to the installation of the proposed loading and was not considered in the analysis. Table 3- Design Antenna and Cable Information Center Number Number Feed Mounting Line Antenna of Antenna Model of Feed Line Level(ft) Elevation Antennas Manufacturer Lines Size(in) (ft) 12 _ ALP 9212 100 100 1 AMPS type platform 3 DB560 80 80 2 8'Standard Dishes tnxTower Report-version 6.0.4.0 Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012 100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/8.5'Extension Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 2012775.806579.01,Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 5 3)ANALYSIS PROCEDURE Table 4-Documents Provided Document Remarks Reference Source Original Tower Drawings EEI Job#: 8 SONNY 257, dated Doc ID#: 642734 Crown DMZ Edwards& Kelcey, Inc. Dwg#: r— Foundation Drawings 92_8012, dated 7/31/91 Doc ID#: 260900 Crown DMZ - --_ - Geotechnical Report FDH Projec10/12/04 16E, dated Doc ID#: 949960 Crown DMZ PJF Job#: 41704-152, dated Modification Drawings Doc ID#: 2412725 Crown DMZ 11/30/05 GPD Project#:2010111.14 Rev. Modification Drawings Doc ID#: 2619474 Crown DMZ C, dated 8/18/10 Modification Drawings GPD Project#: 2011111.18, dated: Doc ID#: 2861710 Crown DMZ 3/30/11 !GPD Project#:2010111.68,dated Post Modification Inspection 3130/11 Doc ID#: 2710931 Crown DMZ Previous Structural Analysis iGPD Project#:2011178.90, dated Doc ID#: 2877581 Crown DMZ 4/29/11 3.1) Analysis Method tnxTower(version 6.0.4.0), a commercially available analysis software package, was used to create a three-dimensional model of the tower and calculate member stresses for various loading cases. Selected output from the analysis is included in Appendix A. 3.2) Assumptions 1) Tower and structures were built in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 2) The tower and structures have been maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specification. 3) The configuration of antennas, transmission Cables, mounts and other appurtenances are as specified in Tables 1 and 2 and the referenced drawings. 4) When applicable, transmission cables are considered as structural components for calculating wind loads as allowed by TIA-222-G. 5) Mount sizes, weights, and manufacturers are best estimates based on photos provided and determined without the benefit of a site visit by GPD. 6) All member connections and foundation steel reinforcing are assumed designed to meet or exceed the load carrying capacity of the connected member and surrounding soils respectively unless otherwise specified in this report. 7) All equipment model numbers, quantities, and centerline elevations are as provided in the CCI CAD package dated 4/10/12 with any adjustments as noted below. This analysis may be affected if any assumptions are not valid or have been made in error. GPD Group should be notified to determine the effect on the structural integrity of the tower. 4)ANALYSIS RESULTS Table 5-Section Capacity (Summary) Section Elevation(ft) Component She Critical P(K) SF'P allow °� Pass/Fail No. Type Element (K) Capacity L1 108.5 100.5 Pole TP12xl2x0.375 1 -0.80 431.40 19.3 Pass tnxTower Report-version 6.0.4.0 Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012 100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/8.5'Extension Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 2012775.806579.01,Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 6 Section Elevation(ft) Component Sae critical P(K) PP allow % Pass/Fall No. Type Element (K) Cal tty _ _ L2 100.5-100 Pole TP14.5xl2x0.375 _ 2 -0.80 431.40 1 19.3 ( Pass 1 -L3 100-82.083 1 Pole TP18.5691xl4.5x0.1875 ' 3 4.68 785.97 j 91.9 Pass 82.083- �- �� L4 70.2338 Pole+Reinf. TP21.2603xl8.569lx0.72691 4 8.58 3418.84 i 51.9 Pass � __ ____�i _-r _ LS ! 6013667 I Pole+Reinf. TP22.7702x19.0894x0.7502 5 -14.62 1 3920.82 72.3 Pass -: L6 33��77 Pole+Reinf. TP29.0368x22.7702x0.8909 6 -22.46 5744.37 76.3 ( Pass ',... -- I � _ 33.7477-� -� -_ Pass L7 30.5 Pole+Reinf. TP29.0291x26.2755x0.9002 7 25.33 5750.99 I L8 1 162083 ! Pole+Reinf. i TP32.2955x29.0291x0.8978 8 -32.82 ICI 6690.52 1 85.4 Pass 12 9583 - -- - I ! .0383x32.2955x0.9036 9 34 31 6891.8o 86.8 j Pass L9 Pole+Reinf. TP33 j 16.2083- L70 12.9583 9 Pole+Reinf. TP33.943x33.0383x0.9784 10 36.28 7655.02 81.4 Pass L11 9 0 Pole+Reinf. TP36x33.943x0.7501 11 39 87 6275.66 104 5 '� Pass Summaryi Pole(1-3) 1 104.5 T Pass Rating- 1 1045 _.._Pass Table 6-Tower Component Stresses vs. Capacity - LC1 Notes Component Elevation(ft) %Capacity Pass/Fail 1 Anchor Rods 0 68.5 Pass 1 Base Plate 0 81.3 Pass --- Base Foundation 1 Soil Interaction 0 48.0 Pass Structure Rating (max from all components)= 104.5% Notes: 1) See additional documentation in"Appendix C-Additional Calculations"for calculations supporting the%capacity consumed. 2) Capacities up to 105%are considered acceptable based on analysis methods used. 4.1) Recommendations We recommend installing additional reinforcing to the monopole shaft. All modifications would need to be engineered and are beyond the scope of this report. tnxTower Report-version 6.0.4.0 Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012 100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/8.5'Extension Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 2012775.806579.01,Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 7 5) DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES GPD GROUP has not performed a site visit to the tower to verify the member sizes or antenna/coax loading. If the existing conditions are not as represented on the tower elevation contained in this report, we should be contacted immediately to evaluate the significance of the discrepancy. This is not a condition assessment of the tower or foundation. This report does not replace a full tower inspection. The tower and foundations are assumed to have been properly fabricated, erected, maintained, in good condition,twist free, and plumb. The engineering services rendered by GPD GROUP in connection with this Structural Analysis are limited to a computer analysis of the tower structure and theoretical capacity of its main structural members. All tower components have been assumed to only resist dead loads when no other loads are applied. No allowance was made for any damaged, bent, missing, loose, or rusted members(above and below ground). No allowance was made for loose bolts or cracked welds. GPD GROUP does not analyze the fabrication of the structure (including welding). It is not possible to have all the very detailed information needed to perform a thorough analysis of every structural sub-component and connection of an existing tower. GPD GROUP provides a limited scope of service in that we cannot verify the adequacy of every weld, plate connection detail, etc. The purpose of this report is to assess the feasibility of adding appurtenances usually accompanied by transmission lines to the structure. It is the owner's responsibility to determine the amount of ice accumulation in excess of the code specified amount, if any, that should be considered in the structural analysis. The attached sketches are a schematic representation of the analyzed tower. If any material is fabricated from these sketches, the contractor shall be responsible for field verifying the existing conditions, proper fit, and clearance in the field. Any mentions of structural modifications are reasonable estimates and should not be used as a precise construction document. Precise modification drawings are obtainable from GPD GROUP, but are beyond the scope of this report. Miscellaneous items such as antenna mounts, etc., have not been designed or detailed as a part of our work. We recommend that material of adequate size and strength be purchased from a reputable tower manufacturer. GPD GROUP makes no warranties, expressed and/or implied, in connection with this report and disclaims any liability arising from material, fabrication, and erection of this tower. GPD GROUP will not be responsible whatsoever for, or on account of, consequential or incidental damages sustained by any person, firm, or organization as a result of any data or conclusions contained in this report. The maximum liability of GPD GROUP pursuant to this report will be limited to the total fee received for preparation of this report. tnxTower Report-version 6.0.4.0 Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012 100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/8.5'Extension Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 2012775.806579.01,Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 8 APPENDIX A TNXTOWER OUTPUT tnxTower Report-version 6.0.4.0 im5n m m DESIGNED APPURTENANCE LOADING e TYPE ELEVATION TYPE ELEVATON T-Arm Mount FA]02-3I 108 '�.E15a00P80 -'80 •- I, u c o m ICI ry m f m BW 10504 wWount Am 1 1 108 IE15608P80 90 wrM 800 IMN onni Ppe :108 ~E15a0aPJ (2)BW 105M wRAauot P" 108 m (2)800 15 wNounlPce IN E15SGi s0 - Q PIJ Mount 1LP 60211 _ iW BO Y x4'Mount Pipe 100 111(4)DB865N65L1xT wNouut Pipe -80 Y x4 Mount Pipe 1 W (4)1)11845165D wMoent Pipe -00 m n $ Yx4'Mount Piro 100 (4)DB,MNW5A1R wNount Pipe W A-10B2411U 100 T-Anm MowI ITA 60281 ]0 r4axM]U090/4DF w/6o'Muefl Poe 100 1=mil 21 WMows Pice 70 (�BJU /60'MavBp pe.100 IBW 10131 w/Ma+M Rpe ]o (AB 700MJ w/W NAM RPe 1W 80010121 w/Malin Rpe 70 1 1 ' 9%ht]t OBOrBCF wMowfl Ppa Jim 7T70.W w/Moufl Pipe 70 83.1fl 13xh1710BLLTLF wAbutl Rpe 1[O 1na00 w/MouB Bxht]t OB0I8CF w4MOwi 100 725002 w/Mouil Rpe 70 (2)FDBRBW9 180 -I25D02 w/MwX Rpe 70 .(Z)FD6RBW4 100 .725002 w/Mount Ripe '70 - -m FD8R8DN 100725a03 w/Mount Roo 70 T-A/in Mount rrA 602-31 80 LGPi)IDS -70 o `ry ' 0TMB%)[8516-R2M /Mount P R B3 I LGP17A5 70 / r (1)TMB%%6516R2M /MouniPce 90 LGP1]205 — 70 ' l (2)TMB%X8518-R2M /Mount pipe 90 '',.m TrANF00110112- 1 70 (2)RRBS1902DPwl Mount Pice Igo I1(2)TTAN40W0112-MOOt I70 _w RR65-19-WDP w/nmoMl pipe _W '',.(2)TrAWUW0112-N1 70 '..,(2)RRBS19J w/mound pipe 50 '..,.N'MJ IPM WI-¶ W Ell W 90 ''..3PS7MG26NM5 MATERIAL STRENGTH 60211 - GRADE Fy Fu I GRADE Fy Fu A SSB-35 ''..35 ks1 '63.i ''..457265 65 k9 '..00 Mi O TOWER DESIGN NOTES 1. Tower is located in Suffolk County,New York. 2. Tower designed for Exposure C to the TIA-222-G Standard. 3. Toyer designed for a 120 mph basic wind in accordance with the TIA-222-G Standard. C Tower is also designed for a 50 mph basic wind with 0.75 in ice.Ice is considered to eincrease in thickness with height. a m 5. Deflections are based upon a 60 mph wind. ry ry 6. Tower Structure Class II. 7. Topographic Category 1 with Crest Height of 0.00 ft n,7 it 105n 1 ALL REACTIONS ARE FACTORED AXIAL 68I K teen SHFJIR l \ MOMENT 7 K �� ,,, Y 543 kip-ft _ o I 130n TORQUE 0 kip-At 50 mph WIND-a 7500 m ICE son i AXIAL 40 K SHEA MOMENT m 46 K�� 3282 kip-ft _ 1 OOn TORQUE 1 kip-ft s REACTIONS-120 mph WIND Q & p c — E t ° m j9 z iw r v . ,*..- GPD Group Job b-NY Cutch0 ue,BU#:806579 ,j#J 520 South Main St.; Suite 2531 JJ 2012775.8011579.01 GPD CROL)P Akron,OH 44311 client:Crown Cast] Drown by:tbowma APPu' coosunirg Engineers Phone:(330)572-2100 cod`- TIA-222-G Daie'.04)19/12 scare: NTS FAX 330 572-2101 PMn lzptzxtznseararsn�wwosz/em Dw9 M0'E-1 Feedline Distribution Chart 01 -108,61, Routs FWI N pJo Fam _ p pOW Face Truss Lm Face A Face B Face C o6.50 ,pB.50 1ww - 1w.w so.w ww L. ' 85w —3 6550__ 8208._. —I 8150 ` _ 81.w w08 8000 c BO.w = r H u 75,50 m m 7225 @ 7225 p _-_ se zs _ m e6 zs a rc rc 'I, rc .—. 60.17. < c C LLU p Q ry Z Z E W 91 Qe i 1 O i ¢ f i� Off' 3375.` J 3050.� 3050 J050 0 m m o 0 1209 900 aw Goo __ _ 050 0.50 000 GPD Group lob -NY Cutche ue,BU#:806579 ///j, 520 South Main St.; Suite 2531 Prue`"2012775.806579.01 CPD CRCAJP Akron,OH 44311 c' m:Crown CasU °ra"'"by tCowma ApV'a: comunine EnOneeo Phone:(330)572-2100 CTd TIA-222-G Dale:04/19/12 smie: NTS FAX: 330 572-2101 Pa11N: 1O'^'prvo.E-7 ' b tnxTower Jo NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 Page1 of 18 GPD Group Project Data 520 South Main St.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH 44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle FAX(330)572-2101 tbowman Tower Input Data There is a pole section. This tower is designed using the TIA-222-G standard. The following design criteria apply: Tower is located in Suffolk County,New York. Basic wind speed of 120 mph. Structure Class II. Exposure Category C. Topographic Category 1. Crest Height 0.00 ft. Nominal ice thickness of 0.7500 in. Ice thickness is considered to increase with height. Ice density of 56 pcf. A wind speed of 50 mph is used in combination with ice. Temperature drop of 50 OF. Deflections calculated using a wind speed of 60 mph. A non-linear(P-delta)analysis was used. Pressures are calculated at each section. Stress ratio used in pole design is 1. Local bending stresses due to climbing loads,feedline supports,and appurtenance mounts are not considered. Options Consider Moments-Legs Distribute Leg Loads As Uniform Treat Feedline Bundles As Cylinder Consider Moments-Horizontals Assume Legs Pinned Use ASCE 10 X-Brace Ly Rules Consider Moments-Diagonals q Assume Rigid Index Plate q Calculate Redundant Bracing Forces Use Moment Magnification d Use Clear Spans For Wind Area Ignore Redundant Members in FEA d Use Code Stress Ratios J Use Clear Spans For KUr SR Leg Bolts Resist Compression Use Code Safety Factors-Guys Retension Guys To Initial Tension J All Leg Panels Have Same Allowable Escalate Ice q Bypass Mast Stability Checks Offset Girt At Foundation Always Use Max Kz d Use Azimuth Dish Coefficients d Consider Feedline Torque Use Special Wind Profile 4 Project Wind Area of Appurt. Include Angle Block Shear Check Include Bolts In Member Capacity d Autocalc Torque Am Areas Poles Leg Bolts Are At Top Of Section SR Members Have Cut Ends Include Shear-Torsion Interaction Secondary Horizontal Braces Leg Sort Capacity Reports By Component Always Use Sub-Critical Flow Use Diamond Inner Bracing(4 Sided) q Triangulate Diamond Inner Bracing Use Top Mounted Sockets Add IBC 6D+W Combination Tapered Pole Section Geometry Section Elevation Section Splice Number TOP Bottom Wall Bend Pole Grade Length Length of Diameter Diameter Thickness Radius B ft ft Sides in in in in LI 108.50-100.50 8.00 0.00 Round 12,0000 12.0000 0.3750 A53-13-35 (35 ksi) L2 100.50-100.00 0.50 0.0o Round 12.0000 14,5000 0.3750 A53-B-35 (35 ksi) L3 10000-8208 17.92 000 12 14.5000 18,5693 0A875 0.7500 A572-65 (65 ksi) L4 82 08-70.23 11.85 3.16 12 18.5691 21.2603 0.7269 2.9076 A572-65 (65 ksi) L5 70.23-%17 13.22 0.00 12 19,0894 22.7702 0.7502 3.0008 A572-65 (65 ksi) tnxTower Job NY Cutchogue, BUM 806579 Page2 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH 44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle FAX;(330)572-2101 tbOWlTlan Section Elevation Section Splice Number Top Bottom Walt Bend Pole Grade Length Length of Diameter Diameter Thickness Radius ft ft ft Sides in in in in L6 60A7-33.75 26.42 4.13 12 22.7702 29.0368 0.8909 3.5636 A572-65 (65 ksi) L7 33,75-30,50 7.38 0.00 12 26.2755 29.0291 0.9002 3.6008 A572-65 (65 ksi) L8 30,50-1621 14.29 0.00 12 29.0291 32.2955 0.8978 3.5912 A572-65 (65 ksi) L9 16.21-12.96 3.25 000 12 32.2955 33,0383 0,9036 3,6144 A572-65 (65 ksi) LIO 12.96-9-00 396 0.00 12 33-0383 33,9430 09784 3.9136 A572-65 (65 ksi) LII 9,00-0.00 9,00 12 33.9430 36,0000 0.7501 3,0004 A572-65 (65 ksi) Tapered Pole Properties Section Tip Dia. Area 1 r C UC J 11/Q w w/t in tnt in' in in in3 in, in, in LI 12.0000 136954 23L5276 4,1152 6.0000 38.5879 462.4244 6.8436 ODOM 0 12,0000 13.6954 23L5276 4,1152 6.0000 38.5879 4624244 6.8436 0,0000 0 L2 12,0000 13.6954 231,5276 4,1152 6,0000 38.5879 462.4244 6,8436 0.0000 0 14.5000 16.6406 415.3261 5,0003 7,2500 57.2864 829.5207 8,3153 0,0000 0 L3 150115 8.6412 225.9382 5,1239 7.5110 30.0810 457.8120 4.2529 3,3835 1&045 19.2241 11,0979 478,6224 6,5806 9,6188 49.7591 969,8188 54620 4.4740 23.861 L4 192241 4L7618 1696.9213 6.3875 9.6188 176.4173 34384226 20.5539 3,0284 4.166 22.0103 48.0608 2586,4203 7.3510 11.0128 234.8551 52403887 23,6541 3,7497 5.158 L5 20.6726 443009 1901.7694 6.5654 9.8883 192.3253 3853A984 2L8036 3.1054 4.139 23.5734 53,1925 3292.0834 7.8832 11,7950 279.1092 6670.6534 26.1797 4.0919 5.454 L6 23.5734 62,7651 3835.0502 7,8328 11.7950 325.1430 7770.8514 30.8911 3.7148 4.17 30.0611 80.7421 81642482 10.0762 15D411 542,7973 16542.9804 39,7388 5.3943 6.055 L7 28.7981 73,5538 6045,2210 9.0843 13.6107 444A525 122492566 36.2010 4,6293 5,143 30.0531 81.5357 8234.5350 10.0701 15.0371 547,6155 166854003 40,1294 5,3673 5,962 L8 30.0531 81.3252 8214.6834 10.0710 15.0371 5462953 16645.1757 40.0258 5.3737 5.985 33,4348 90.7681 11421.2840 11,2404 16,7291 682.7208 23142.6178 44.6733 6.2491 6.96 L9 33.4348 91,3376 11488.6990 11.2383 16.7291 686,7506 23279.2189 44,9536 6.2335 6.899 34.2038 93.4989 12323,6908 11.5042 IT 1138 720,1009 24971,1387 46,0173 6,4326 7.119 LIO 342038 101.0030 13250.8811 114774 IT1138 774.2787 26849.8775 49.7106 6.2322 6.37 35A404 103.8533 14404,6164 11.8013 17,5825 8192599 29187,6581 51,1134 6.4746 6.618 LII 35,1404 80,1715 11274A815 11,8831 17.5825 641.2341 22845A563 394580 7,0865 9447 37,2699 85,1399 135011364 12.6195 1&6480 724.1064 27361,0153 41.9032 7.6377 10,182 I Tower Gusset Gusset Gusset Grade Adjust.Factor Adjust. Weight Malt. Double Angle Double Angle Elevation Area Thickness AJ Factor Stitch Bolt Stitch Bolt (perface) A, Spacing Spacing Diagonals Horizontals B Jr, in in in LI 1 1 1 108.50-100,50 L2 1 I 1 100,50-100 00 L3 1 1 1 100.00-82 O8 L4 82.08-70.23 1 1 1 L5 70,23-60,17 1 1 1 L6 60.17-33.75 1 1 1 L7 33.75-30.50 1 1 1 L8 30,50-16 21 1 1 1 L9 16.21-12,96 1 1 1 L I 0 12.96-9 00 1 1 1 tnxl older Job Page NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 3 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle tbOWman FAX:(330)572-210/ Tower Gusset Gusset Gusset Grade Adjust Factor Adjust. Weight Mult. Double Angle Double Angle Elevation Area Thickness Af Factor Stitch Bolt Stitch Bolt (perface) A, Spacing Spacing Diagonals Hori=ovals ft ft, in in in L I 1 9.00-0.00 I 1 1 Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances - Entered As Round Or Flat Description Sector Component Placement Total Number Start/End Width or Perimeter Weight Type Number Per Row Position Diameter ft in in kl( LDF7-50A(1-5/8 FOAM) A Surface At 108.00-8.00 12 6 0000 1.9800 0.00 (CaAa) 0.000 LDF2-50A(3/8 FOAM) A Surface At 108.00-8.00 1 1 0 000 0.0000 0.00 (CaAa) 0.000 LDF4P-50A(1/2 FOAM) A Surface At 30.00-8.00 1 1 0000 0.0000 0.00 (CaAa) 0.000 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev G) A Surface Af 30.50-0.50 I 1 0.000 79300 249100 0.00 (CaAa) 0.000 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev G) B Surface Af 30.50-0.50 1 1 0.000 7,9300 24.9100 0.00 (CaAa) 0.000 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev G) C Surface Af 30.50-0.50 1 I 0.000 79300 24.9100 0.00 (CaAa) 0.000 MP3-06 Mod Channel(Rev G) A Surface Af 85.50-30.50 1 1 0 000 6.8900 21,9900 0.00 (CaAa) 0.000 MP3-06 Mod Channel(Rev G) B Surface Af 85.50-30.50 1 1 0.000 6.8900 21.9900 0.00 (CaAa) 0.000 MP3-06 Mad Channel(Rev G) C Surface Af 85.50-30.50 1 1 0.000 6.8900 21.9900 0.00 (CaAa) 0.000 Bridge Stiffeners B Surface Af 72.25-66.25 1 1 0.000 3.8151 27.6250 0,05 (CaAa) 0.000 Bridge Stiffeners B Surface Af 81.50-75.50 1 1 0.000 3.8151 27.6250 0.05 (CaAa) 0.000 Bridge Stiffeners C Surface Af 72.25-66.25 1 1 0.000 3.8151 27.6250 0.05 (CaAa) 0.000 Bridge Stiffeners C Surface Af 81.50-75.50 1 1 0.000 3.8151 27.6250 0.05 (CaAa) 0.000 Step Pegs C Surface At 108.50-8.00 1 1 0.000 0.0000 0.00 (CaAa) 0.000 Safety Line 3/8 C Surface At 108.50-8.00 1 1 0.000 0.0000 0.00 (CaAa) 0.000 Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances - Entered As Area Description Face Allow Component Placement Total CA, Weight or Shield Type Number Leg ft fr'/F klf LDF5-50A(7/8 FOAM) A No Inside Pole 100.00-8,00 12 No Ice 0.00 0.00 1/2"Ice 000 0.00 1"Ice 0.00 0.00 LDF2-50A(3/8 FOAM) A No Inside Pole 100.00-8.00 1 No Ice 0,00 0.00 1/2"Ice 0.00 0.00 1"Ice 0.00 0.00 LDF5-50A(7/8 FOAM) B No Inside Pole 90.00-8.00 24 No Ice 0.00 0.00 1/2"Ice 0.00 0.00 P Ice 0.00 0.00 LDF5-50A(7/8 FOAM) C No Inside Pole 80.00-8.00 12 No Ice 0.00 0.00 1/2"Ice 0.00 0.00 1"Ice 0.00 0.00 Tower Job Page Mx Tower NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 4 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle FAX:(330)572-2101 tbowman Description Face Allow Component Placement Total CAA Weight or Shield Type Number Leg ft ft'Ift kl LDF5-50A(7/8 FOAM) C No Inside Pole 70.00-8,00 12 No Ice 0.00 0.00 12"Ice 0.00 0.00 1"Ice 0,00 0,00 Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances Section Areas Tower Tower Face As Ar CAAA CaA, Weight Section Elevation In Face Out Face ft ft, ft, It' ft, K LI 108.50-100.50 A 0.000 0,000 8.910 0.000 0.07 B 0.000 0.000 0,000 0,000 0,00 C 0,000 0,000 0.000 0,000 0.02 L2 100.50-100.00 A 0,000 0,000 0.594 0.000 0,00 B 0,000 0,000 0,000 0.000 0.00 C 0.000 0,000 0,000 0.000 0,00 L3 100,00-82.08 A 0.000 0,000 25209 0.000 025 B 0,000 0.000 3.924 0,000 0.06 C ODOO 0.000 3.924 0.000 0.05 L4 8208-7023 A 0,000 0.000 27.684 0.000 OA7 B 0.000 0000 18,704 0,000 049 C 0,000 0.000 18 704 0.000 047 L5 70.23-60,17 A 0.000 0.000 23,520 0.000 0.14 B 0,000 0.000 14,093 0.000 028 C 0,000 0.000 14.093 ODOO 0.31 L6 60.17-33.75 A 0.000 0,000 61,724 0.000 037 B 0000 0,000 30.338 0,000 021 C 0.000 0,000 30.338 0.000 0.29 L7 33,75-30.50 A 0.000 0,000 7.588 0.000 0,05 B 0,000 0.000 3 729 0.000 0.03 C 0,000 0.000 3.729 0,000 0.04 L8 30.50-16.21 A 0.000 0.000 35,867 0.000 020 B 0.000 0.000 18.889 0 000 0.11 C 0,000 M)00 18.889 0.000 0,16 L9 16.21-12.96 A 0000 0.000 8,156 0.000 0.05 B 0,000 MOO 4295 0.000 003 C 0.000 0-000 4,295 0.000 0,04 LIO 12,96-9.00 A 0.000 0,000 9934 0.000 0,06 B 0.000 0,000 5.232 0.000 0,03 C 0.000 0,000 5.232 0,000 0,04 LII 9,00-0,00 A 0.000 0,000 12422 0,000 0.01 B 0.000 0.000 11.234 0.000 001 C 0,000 0.000 11234 0.000 001 Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances Section Areas - With Ice Tower Tower Face Ice Are AF CAA CAAA Weight Section Elevation or Thickness In Face Out Face ft Leg in fly ft, ft, ftt K LI 108,50-100,50 A 1,683 0.000 0,000 16.819 0,000 0.31 B 0,000 0,000 0.000 0,000 0.00 C 0,000 0,000 5.386 0,000 0,08 L2 100.50-100.00 A 1.676 0,000 0,000 1,120 0,000 0.02 B 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 000 C 0,000 0.000 0.335 0,000 0.00 L3 100.00-82 O8 A 1660 0,000 0.000 45.045 0,000 0.87 B 0.000 0 000 5.058 0.000 0,13 C 0.000 0.000 16.952 0.000 024 tnxl older Job Page NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 5 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle tbowman FAX:(330)572-2101 Tower Tower Face Ice As AF CAA.A CAAA Weight Section Elevation or Thickness In Face Out Face ft Leg in Jr, ftr ft' ft, K L4 82.08-70.23 A L631 0.000 0.000 43.761 0.000 0.74 B 0.000 0.000 23.362 0.000 0.88 C 0.000 0 000 31.090 0.000 0.93 L5 70.23-60.17 A 1,605 0.000 0000 37.180 0.000 0.63 B 0.000 0.000 17.776 0.000 0.54 C OD00 0.000 24.342 0.000 0.64 L6 60.17-33.75 A 1,552 0.000 0.000 96.223 0.000 1,58 B 0.000 0.000 38.539 0.000 0.65 C 0.000 0.000 54.940 0.000 0.89 L7 33 75-30.50 A 1 496 0.000 0.000 11.829 0.000 0.19 B 0.000 0.000 4.738 0.000 0.08 C 0.000 0 000 6.754 0.000 0.11 L8 30.50-16.21 A 1.448 0.000 0000 5T560 0000 0.87 B 0.000 0.000 23.028 0.000 0.36 C 0.000 0.000 31.308 0.000 0.47 L9 16.21-12.96 A 1.382 0.000 0.000 12.940 0.000 0.19 B 0.000 0.000 5.194 0.000 0.08 C 0.000 0.000 6.991 0.000 0.10 LIO 12.96-9.00 A 1.344 0.000 0.000 15.630 0000 0.23 B 0.000 0.000 6.295 0.000 0.09 C 0.000 0.000 8,423 0.000 0.12 LII 9.00-0.00 A 1.228 0.000 0.000 15.605 0.000 0.16 B 0.000 0.000 13.321 0.000 0.13 C 0.000 0.000 13.813 0.000 0.13 Feed Line Center of Pressure Section Elevation CPr CP¢ CP.r CPt Ice Ice ft in in in in LI 108.50-100.50 -0.9246 -0.5338 -0.7571 -0.2214 L2 100.50-100.00 -0.9796 -0.5656 -0.8225 -02510 L3 100.00-82.08 -0.8155 -0.4708 -0.7958 -0.2348 L4 82.08-70.23 -0.2378 -0.1373 -0.3697 -0-0650 L5 70 23-60.17 -0.3522 -0.2033 -0 4727 -0.1093 L6 60.17-33.75 -0.5639 -0.3256 -0.6767 -0.1957 L7 33.75-30.50 -0.5923 -0.3420 -0.7193 -0.2057 L8 30.50-16.21 -0.5751 -0.3320 -0.7826 -0.2558 L9 16.21-12.96 -0.5950 -0.3435 -0.8145 -0.2717 LIO 12.96-9.00 -06029 -0.3481 -0.8254 42786 L11 9.00-0.00 -0.0793 -0.0458 -0.1277 -0.0448 Shielding Factor Ka Tower Feed Line Description Feed Line K. Ka Section Record No. Segment Elev. No Ice Ice Ll 6 LDF7-50A(1-5/8 FOAM) 100.50- 1.0000 1.0000 108,00 LI 7 LDF2-50A(3/8 FOAM) 10050- 1.0000 1.0000 108.00 LI 26 Step Pegs I00.50- 1.0000 1.0000 108.50 LI 27 Safety Line 3/8 100.50- 1.0000 10000 108.50 L2 6 LDF7-SOA(1-5/8 FOAM) 100.00- L0000 10000 100.50 L2 7 LDF2-50A(3/8 FOAM) 100.00- 1.0000 10000 tnxTower Job NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 Page 6 a e6 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle FAX:(330)572-2101 tbowman Tower Feed Line Description Feed Line K, K. Section Record No. Segment Elev. No Ice Ice 100,50 L2 26 Step Pegs 100DO- 1.0000 1,0000 100.50 L2 27 Safety Line 3/8 100.00- 1.0000 1.0000 100.50 L3 6 LDF7-50A(1-5/8 FOAM) 82.08-100,00 1,0000 1.0000 L3 7 LDF2-50A(3/8 FOAM) 82.08-100.00 1.0000 I.0000 L3 19 MP3-06 Mad Channel(Rev 82.08-85.50 1.0000 1.0000 G) L3 20 MP3-06 Mod Channel(Rev 82.08-85.50 1.0000 1.0000 G) L3 21 MP3-06 Mod Channel(Rev 82.08-85,50 L0000 1.0000 G) L3 26 Step Pegs 82.08-100.00 1.0000 1,0000 L3 27 Safety Line 3/8 82.08-100.00 1.0000 1,0000 L4 6 LDF7-50A(1-5/8 FOAM) 7023-82,08 1,0000 1,0000 L4 7 LDF2-50A(3/8 FOAM) 70.23-82.08 1,0000 1.0000 L4 19 MP3-06 Mod Channel(Rev 7023-82,08 1,0000 10000 G) L4 20 MP3-06 Mod Channel(Rev 7023-82,08 1,0000 10000 G) L4 21 MP3-06 Mod Channel(Rev 70,23-82.08 1,0000 1.0000 G) L4 22 Bridge Stiffeners 70,23-72 25 1,0000 1,0000 L4 23 Bridge Stiffeners 75,50-81.50 1.0000 1.0000 L4 24 Bridge Stiffeners 70 23-72 25 10000 10000 L4 25 Bridge Stiffeners 75.50-81.50 1.0000 1,0000 L4 26 Step Pegs 70.23-82,08 1,0000 1.0000 L4 27 Safety Line 3/8 70,23-82.08 1.0000 1.0000 L6 6 LDF7-50A(1-5/8 FOAM) 33.75-60.17 1,0000 1,0000 L6 7 LDF2-50A(3/8 FOAM) 33,75-60.17 1.0000 1.0000 L6 19 MP3-06 Mod Channel(Rev 33.75-60.17 L0000 1,0000 G) L6 20 MP3-06 Mod Channel(Rev 33.75-60.17 1.0000 1.0000 G) L6 21 MP3-06 Mod Channel(Rev 33,75-60,17 1,0000 1.0000 G) L6 26 Step Pegs 33.75-60.17 1,0000 1,0000 L6 27 Safety Line 3/8 33.75-60.17 1,0000 1.0000 L8 6 LDF7-50A(1-5/8 FOAM) 16,21-30,50 1,0000 10000 L8 7 LDF2-50A(3/8 FOAM) 16,21-30.50 1.0000 1,0000 L8 8 LDF4P-50A(1/2 FOAM) 16.21-30,00 10000 I.0000 L8 16 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev 16.21-30.50 1.0000 1,0000 G) L8 17 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev 16 21-30.50 1,0000 10000 G) L8 18 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev 16.21-30.50 1.0000 1.0000 G) L8 26 Step Pegs 16,21-30.50 1,0000 1.0000 L8 27 Safety Line 3/8 16,21-30,50 1,0000 1.0000 L9 6 LDF7-50A(1-5/8 FOAM) 12.96-16.21 1.0000 L0000 L9 7 LDF2-50A(3/8 FOAM) 12.96-16.21 1.0000 1,0000 L9 8 LDF4P-50A(12 FOAM) 12.96-16,21 1.0000 1.0000 L9 16 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev 12.96-16,21 1.0000 1.0000 G) L9 17 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev 12.96-16,21 10000 1,0000 G) L9 18 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev 12.96-16,21 1.0000 L0000 G) L9 26 Step Pegs 12 96-1621 1.0000 10000 L9 27 Safety Line 3/8 12.96-16.21 1.0000 L0000 LIO 6 LDF7-50A(1-5/8 FOAM) 900- 12961 10000 10000 tnxTower Job NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 Page7 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle tbownran FAX(330)572-2101 Tower Feed Line Description Feed Line K. K. Section Record No. Segment Elev. No Ice Ice LI0 7 LDF2-50A(3/8 FOAM) 9.00-12.96 1.0000 1.0000 LID 8 LDF4P-50A(12 FOAM) 9.00-12.96 1.0000 1.0000 LID 16 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev 9.00-12.96 1.0000 1.0000 G) LI0 17 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev 9,00-12,96 1.0000 1.0000 G) LID 18 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev 9.00-12.96 1.0000 1.0000 G) LI0 26 Step Pegs 900-12,96 L0000 I.0000 LID 27 Safety Line 3/8 900- 12.96 1,0000 L0000 LII 6 LDF7-50A(1-5/8 FOAM) 800-9,00 1.0000 1.0000 LII 7 LDF2-50A(3/8 FOAM) 8,00-9.00 1.0000 10000 LII 8 LDF4P-50A(12 FOAM) K00-9,00 1,0000 1.0000 LII 16 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev 0.50-9.00 1,0000 1,0000 G) LII 17 MP3.08 Mod Channel(Rev 0,50-9.00 1.0000 1,0000 G) L11 18 MP3-08 Mod Channel(Rev 0,50-9.00 1.0000 1.0000 G) LII 26 Step Pegs 8,00-9,00 1.0000 1.0000 LIII 27 Safety Line 3/8 8.00-9.00 I.0000 1.0000 Discrete Tower Loads Description Face Offset Offsets: Azimuth Placement C,,L CAA Weight or Type Hor_ Adjustment Front Side Leg Lateral Pert ft o ft ft, ft' K F ft T-Arm Mount[TA 702-3] C None 0,0000 108.00 No Ice 5.64 5.64 0.34 1/2"Ice 6.55 6.55 0.43 I"Ice 746 7A6 0.52 800 10504 w/Mount Pipe A From Leg 3.46 30.0000 MUD No Ice 3.94 3,53 0.04 2,00 1/2"Ice 4.55 4.59 0.08 2,00 1"Ice 5,06 5.36 0,12 800 10504 w/Mount Pipe A From Leg 3.46 40.0000 108.00 No Ice 394 3.53 OA4 2.00 1/2"Ice 4,55 4.59 0,08 2.00 1"Ice 5,06 5.36 0,12 (2)800 I0504 w/Mount Pipe B From Leg 394 10,0000 108.00 No Ice 3.94 3.53 0,04 0.69 1/2"Ice 4.55 4.59 0.08 2.00 1"Ice 5.06 5.36 0.12 (2)800 10504 w/Mount Pipe C From Leg 3,94 10.0000 108.00 No Ice 3.94 353 0.04 069 1/2"Ice 4,55 4.59 0,08 100 1"Ice 5.06 5.36 0.12 Platform Mount[LP 602-11 C None 0,0000 100.00 No Ice 32.03 32.03 1,34 1/2"Ice 38.71 3&71 1,80 1"Ice 45.39 45.39 2.26 2"x 4'Mount Pipe A From 3.80 -1&0000 100.00 No Ice 0,79 0.79 0.02 Centroid-Le -L24 1/2"Ice 1,03 1.03 0.03 g 0.00 P Ice 1,28 1,28 0.04 2"x 4'Mount Pipe B From 3.80 -18 0000 100.00 No Ice 0.79 0,79 0.02 Centroid-Le -1,24 1/2"Ice 1.03 1,03 0,03 g 0.00 I"Ice 1,28 1.28 0.04 2"x 4'Mount Pipe C From 3,80 -18 0000 100.00 No Ice 0.79 0,79 0,02 Centroid-Le -124 1/2"Ice 103 1,03 003 g 0.00 I"Ice 1,28 1,28 0.04 A-18A24N-U C From 3,80 0,0000 100.00 No Ice 6,32 6,32 0.01 Centroid-Le -1 24 1/2"Ice 6,83 6.83 0,04 e tnxTower Job 9 NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 Page of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle FAX(330)572-2101 fbOWman Description Face Offset Offsets: Azimuth Placement CA, CAAe Weight or Type Horz Adjustment Front Side Leg Lateral Vert ft ft ft= ft, K ft ft g 0.00 1"Ice 7.34 7.34 0,07 (2)BXA-70090/4CF w/60" A From 3.80 -18.0000 100.00 No Ice 4,01 4.04 0.04 Mount Pipe Centroid-Le -1.24 1/2"Ice 4.44 465 0.08 g 4.00 1"Ice 4.88 5.28 0.13 (2)BXA-70090/4CF w/60" B From 3.80 -18,0000 100,00 No Ice 4.01 4.04 0.04 Mount Pipe Centroid-Le -1,24 1/2"Ice 4.44 4.65 0.08 g 4.00 1"Ice 4.88 5,28 0.13 (2)BXA-70090/4CF w/60" C From 3,80 -18.0000 100.00 No Ice 4.01 4D4 0.04 Mount Pipe Centroid-Le -1.24 1/2"Ice 444 4,65 0,08 g 4.00 I"Ice 4.88 528 013 BXA-171090/SCF w/Mount A From 3.80 -18.0000 100.00 No Ice 3.63 3.80 004 Pipe Centroid-Le -1.24 12"Ice 4,25 4.83 0,07 g 4.00 1"Ice 4,78 5,57 0.12 BXA-I 71090/8CF w/Mount B From 3.80 -18,0000 100.00 No Ice 3.63 3.80 0.04 Pipe Centroid-Le -1.24 1/2"Ice 4,25 4.83 0.07 g 4.00 1"Ice 478 5.57 0.12 BXA-171090/SCF w/Mount C From 3-80 -18,0000 100.00 No lee 3.63 3.80 0.04 Pipe Centroid-Le -L24 1/2"Ice 425 4.83 0.07 g 4,00 I"Ice 4.78 5.57 0.12 (2)FD9R6004 A From 3 80 -18,0000 100,00 No Ice 0,37 0.25 0.00 Centroid-Le -1,24 1/2"Ice OAS 032 001 g 4,00 1"Ice 0,54 0.40 0.01 (2)FD9R6004 B From 3,80 -18.0000 100.00 No Ice 0.37 0,25 0.00 Centroid-Le -124 1/2"Ice 045 0,32 0.01 g 4,00 1"Ice 0.54 0,40 0,01 (2)FD9R6004 C From 3,80 -18.0000 100.00 No Ice 0,37 0.25 0,00 Centroid-Le -1,24 1/2"Ice 045 0.32 0.01 g 400 1"Ice 0.54 0.40 001 T-Arm Mount[TA 602-3] C None 0,0000 90.00 No Ice I L59 11,59 077 12"Ice 15.44 15 44 0.99 P Ice 19,29 1919 121 (2)TMBXX-6516-R2M w/ A From Leg 3,46 30,0000 90.00 No Ice 7.56 532 0.06 Mount Pipe 2.00 1/2"Ice 8.34 6,92 0.12 000 1"Ice 9.07 T97 0,19 (2)TMBXX-6516-R2M w/ B From Leg 3.46 30,0000 90.00 No Ice 7.56 5,72 0.06 Mount Pipe 200 12"Ice 8.34 6,92 0,12 0,00 1"Ice 9.07 7,97 0.19 (2)TMBXX-6516-R2M w/ C From Leg 3A6 30,0000 90.00 No Ice 7.56 5.72 006 Mount Pipe 2.00 1/2"Ice 8,34 6.92 0.12 0.00 1"Ice 9,07 7.97 0.19 (2)RR65-19-02DP w/Mount A From Leg 3 46 30.0000 90,00 No Ice 6,10 441 0,04 Pipe 200 1/2"Ice 6.67 5.62 0.09 0.00 1"Ice 7.19 6.50 0.14 (2)RR65-19-02DP w/mount B From Leg 3,46 300000 90,00 No Ice 6.10 4.41 0.04 pipe 2.00 1/2"Ice 6.67 5.62 0.09 0,00 I"Ice 7.19 6,50 0.14 (2)RR65-19-02DP w/mount C From Leg 346 30,0000 90.00 No Ice 6.10 4,41 0.04 pipe 2,00 1/2"Ice 6.67 5.62 0.09 0.00 P Ice 7,19 6.50 0.14 E15S08P80 A From Leg 346 30.0000 9000 No Ice 0.23 0,12 0.01 2.00 1/2"Ice 0,30 0.17 0.01 0.00 PIce 0.38 024 0,02 E15S08P80 B From Leg 346 30,0000 9000 No Ice 0,23 0,12 001 2,00 1/2"Ice 0,30 0.17 001 0,00 1"lee 0,38 0.24 002 E15S08P80 C From Leg 146 30.0000 9000 No Ice 023 0.12 0.01 200 1/2"Ice 0,30 0,17 0.01 tnxTo er Job Page NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 9 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH 44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle tbowman FAX:(330)572-2101 Description Face Offset Offsets: Azimuth Placement C 4A CAA Weight or Type Hon Adjustment Front Side Leg Lateral Vert ft ft ft, ft, K It f[ 0,00 1"Ice 0.38 024 0.02 E15S09P94 A From Leg 3.46 30.0000 90,00 No Ice 0.66 0.37 0.01 200 I/2"Ice 0.78 0.46 0.02 0.00 1"Ice 0.90 0,56 0.03 E15S09P94 B From Leg 3.46 30,0000 90.00 No Ice 0,66 0.37 0.01 2.00 1/2"Ice 0.78 0.46 0,02 0.00 1"Ice 0.90 O56 0.03 E15S09P94 C From Leg 3,46 30.0000 90.00 No Ice 0,66 0.37 0.01 2.00 1/2"Ice 038 0,46 0,02 0.00 P Ice 0.90 0.56 0.03 Platform Mount[LP 305-11 C None 0.0000 8000 No Ice 18.01 1&01 1,12 1/2"Ice 2333 23.33 1.35 V Ice 28.65 28.65 1,58 (4)DB845N65ZAXT A From 3.46 30,0000 80.00 No Ice 6,31 6,63 0.04 w/Mount Pipe Centroid-Le 2,00 1/2'Ice 6.97 7,80 0,10 g 2,00 1"Ice 7,57 8.69 0.17 (4)DB845N65ZAXT B From 146 30.0000 80.00 No Ice 6,31 6.63 004 w/Mount Pipe Centroid-Le 2.00 1/2"Ice 697 7,80 0.10 g 2.00 1"Ice 7.57 8.69 0.17 (4)DB845N65ZAXT C From 3.46 30.0000 80.00 No Ice 6.31 6.63 0.04 w/Mount Pipe Centroid-Le 2.00 1/2"Ice 6.97 780 0,10 g 2.00 P Ice 757 8,69 0.17 T-Arm Mount[TA 602-3] C None 0.0000 70.00 No Ice 11.59 11,59 0.77 1/2"Ice 15.44 1544 0,99 1"Ice 19.29 1929 1,21 800 10121 w/Mount Pipe A From Leg 336 20.0000 70,00 No Ice 5,69 4.60 0,07 137 1/2"Ice 6A8 5.34 0.11 0,00 1"Ice 6,67 6.04 0,17 800 10121 w/Mount Pipe B From Leg 4.00 0,0000 70.00 No Ice 5.69 4.60 0.07 0.00 1/2"Ice 6A8 5.34 0.11 0,00 1"Ice 6,67 6.04 0.17 800 10121 w/Mount Pipe C From Leg 4.00 0,0000 70,00 No Ice 5.69 460 0,07 0.00 1/2"Ice 6.18 5.34 0.11 0,00 1"Ice 6.67 6.04 0.17 7770.00 w/Mount Pipe A From Leg 3.76 20.0000 70.00 No Ice 5.88 4,10 0.06 1.37 1/2"Ice 6.31 433 0_I I 000 1"Ice 6.75 5.37 0.16 7770 00 w/Mount Pipe B From Leg 4.00 0.0000 70,00 No Ice 5,88 4.10 0.06 0,00 1/2"Ice 631 4,73 0,11 0.00 1"Ice 635 5,37 0.16 7770.00 w/Mount Pipe C From Leg 4.00 0,0000 70.00 No Ice 5.88 4.10 0,06 0.00 1/2"Ice 631 4.73 0,11 0.00 I"Ice 6,75 5.37 0.16 7250,02 w/Mount Pipe A From Leg 3.76 20.0000 70,00 No Ice 4,24 3.32 0.04 1,37 1/2"Ice 4.71 4,30 0.07 0 00 1"Ice 5,17 5.05 0.11 7250.02 w/Mount Pipe B From Leg 4 00 0.0000 70.00 No Ice 424 3.32 0.04 0.00 1/2"Ice 4,71 4.30 007 0,00 P Ice 5.17 5,05 0.11 7250.02 w/Mount Pipe C From Leg 4,00 0.0000 70,00 No Ice 424 3.32 0.04 0,00 1/2"Ice 4.71 4.30 007 0,00 1"Ice 5,17 5,05 0.11 LGP17205 A From Leg 3.76 20.0000 70,00 No Ice 1.95 0.50 0.03 137 1/2"Ice 2.13 0.62 004 0.00 1"Ice 2.33 0.75 006 LGP17205 B From Leg 4.00 0,0000 70,00 No Ice 1.95 0.50 0.03 000 1/2"Ice 2,13 0.62 0.04 Job Page tnxTower NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 10 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle FAX:(330)572-2101 tbOWman Description Face Offset Offsets: Azimuth Placement CA,, CAAA Weight or Type Hor. Adjustment Front Side Leg Lateral Vert ft fr ft' ft' K ft ft 0.00 1"Ice 2,33 0,75 0.06 LGP17205 C From Lcg 4.00 0,0000 70.00 No Ice L95 0,50 0.03 0.00 1/2"Ice 2.13 0,62 0.04 0.00 1"Ice 233 075 0,06 (2)TIAW-0000112-001 A From Leg 3,76 20.0000 70.00 No Ice 0.44 0.15 0,01 1.37 1/2"Ice 0.53 0,21 0,01 (too 1"Ice 0.63 029 0,01 (2)TTAW-0000112-001 B From Leg 4,00 0.0000 70.00 No Ice 0.44 0.15 0,01 0-00 1/2"Ice 0.53 021 0.01 000 1"Ice 0,63 029 0.01 (2)TTAW-0000112-001 C From Leg 400 MOM 70.00 No Ice 044 0.15 0.01 0.00 1/2"Ice 0.53 0.21 0.01 000 1"Ice 063 0.29 0.01 Pipe Mount[PM 601-1] A From Leg 0.50 0,0000 30,00 No Ice 3,00 0,90 0,07 000 1/2"Ice 334 L12 0.08 000 1"Ice 448 1,34 0,09 GPS-TMG-26NMS A From Leg 1.00 0,0000 30.00 No Ice 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.00 1/2"lee 021 0.21 0,00 0.00 1"Ice 028 0.28 0.01 Load Combinations Comb. Description Na I Dead Only 2 12 Dead+1.6 Wind 0 deg-No Ice 3 0.9 Dead+I.6 Wind 0 deg-No Ice 4 12 Dead+1.6 Wind 30 deg-No Ice 5 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 30 deg-No lee 6 12 Dead+1.6 Wind 60 deg-No Ice 7 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 60 deg-No Ice 8 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 90 deg-No Ice 9 0.9 Dead+l 6 Wind 90 deg-No Ice 10 12 Dead+1 6 Wind 120 deg-No Ice 11 0,9 Dead+1 6 Wind 120 deg-No Ice 12 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 150 deg-No Ice 13 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 150 deg-No Ice 14 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 180 deg-No Ice 15 0,9 Dead+1.6 Wind 180 deg-No Ice 16 12 Dead+1.6 Wind 210 deg-No Ice 17 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 210 deg-No Ice 18 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 240 deg-No Ice 19 0,9 Dead+1.6 Wind 240 deg-No Ice 20 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 270 deg-No Ice 21 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 270 deg-No Ice 22 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 300 deg-No Ice 23 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 300 deg-No Ice 24 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 330 deg-No Ice 25 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 330 deg-No Ice 26 1 2 Dead+1 0Ice+1.0 Temp 27 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 0 deg+1 0 lce+1.0 Temp 28 1,2 Dead+1.0 Wind 30 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 29 12 Dead+1 0 Wind 60 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 30 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 90 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 31 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 120 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp sl x Qwer Job Page NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 11 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle tbowman FAX:(330)572-2101 Comb. Description No. 32 1.2 Dead+I.O Wind 150 deg+1.0 lce+1.0 Temp 33 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 180 deg+1.0 lce+1.0 Temp 34 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 210 deg+1.0 lce+1.0 Temp 35 1 2 Dead+1.0 Wind 240 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 36 1.2 Dead+I.O Wind 270 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 37 1 2 Dead+1.0 Wind 300 deg+1.0 lce+1.0 Temp 38 12 Dead+I 0 Wind 330 deg+I.O Ice+1.0 Temp 39 Dead+Wind 0 deg-Service 40 Dead+Wind 30 deg-Service 41 Dead+Wind 60 deg-Service 42 Dead+Wind 90 deg-Service 43 Dead+Wind 120 deg-Service 44 Dead+Wind 150 deg-Service 45 Dead+Wind 180 deg-Service 46 Dead+Wind 210 deg-Service 47 Dead+Wind 240 deg-Service 48 Dead+Wind 270 deg-Service 49 Dead+Wind 300 deg-Service 50 Dead+Wind 330 deg-Service Maximum Reactions Location Condition Gov. Vertical Horizontal,X Horizontal,Z Load K K K Comb. Pole Max.Vert 34 68.11 3.54 -6.13 Max.H, 20 40.15 40.29 -0.13 Max.H, 2 40.15 -0,13 4259 Max.M, 2 3094,55 .0,13 42.59 Max.M, 8 2973.38 -40.29 0.13 Max.Torsion 20 1.33 40.29 -0.13 Min.Vert 11 30.11 -34.86 -19,99 Min.H. 8 40.15 -40.29 0,13 Min.H, 14 40.15 0,13 42,59 Min.M. 14 -3094.84 0.13 -42,59 Min.M, 20 -2973.30 4029 -OA3 Min.Torsion 8 -1.34 -40,29 0,13 Tower Mast Reaction Summary Load Vertical Shear, Shear, Overturning Overturning Torque Combination Moment,M. Moment,M K K K kipfi kipft kipft Dead Only 33,46 0,00 0.00 OA I -0.02 0.00 11 Dead+1.6 Wind 0 deg-No 40A 5 0.13 -42.59 -3094.55 -9,92 -0.04 Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 0 deg-No 30.11 0.13 -42.59 -3075.11 -9,84 -0,04 Ice 12 Dead+l.6 Wind 30 deg-No 40.15 23.05 -39.70 -2837,25 -1648.95 -0.76 Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 30 deg-No 30,11 23.05 -39.70 -2819,45 -1638.57 -0.76 Ice 12 Dead+1.6 Wind 60 deg-No 40.15 3705 -21.40 -1555.74 -2693.75 0,92 Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 60 deg-No 30,11 37.05 -2140 -1545.98 -2676.78 0,93 Ice 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 90 deg-No 40.15 4029 -0,13 -9,74 -2973.38 1.34 Wx'TQwer Job NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 Page12 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH 44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle FAX:(330)572-2101 tbowman Load Vertical Shear, Shear, Overturning Overturning Torque Combination Moment,M. Moment,M K K K ,lip ft kip ft kip ft Ice 0.9 Dead+16 Wind 90 deg-No 30.11 40,29 -0.13 -9.71 -2954,46 1.34 Ice 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 120 deg- 40A5 34,86 19.99 1486.38 -2592.89 0.97 No Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 120 deg- 30.11 34.86 19,99 1476.88 -2576.38 0,97 No Ice 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 150 deg- 40.15 20,03 34.73 2561.50 -1478A8 0.33 No Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 150 deg- 30,11 20,03 34.73 2545,18 -1468.77 0,33 No Ice 12 Dead+I.6 Wind 180 deg- 40,15 -0,13 42,59 3094.84 9,84 0.03 No Ice 0.9 Dead+1 6 Wind I80 deg- 30,11 -0,13 42.59 3075,32 9.79 0.03 No Ice 12 Dead+1.6 Wind 210 deg- 40,15 -23.05 39.70 2837.54 1648,87 0.75 No Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 210 deg- 30.11 -23.05 39.70 2819.67 1638.52 0.75 No Ice 1 2 Dead+1 6 Wind 240 deg- 40.15 -37.05 21.40 1556,02 2693.68 -0.93 No Ice 0 9 Dead+1.6 Wind 240 deg- 30.11 -37.05 21.40 1546.19 2676.73 -0,93 No Ice 12 Dead+1.6 Wind 270 deg- 40.15 -40.29 0.13 10.02 2973.30 -1.33 No Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 270 deg- 30.11 -40,29 0.13 9.92 295441 -1,33 No Ice 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 300 deg- 40.IS -34.86 -19,99 -1486.10 2592.81 -0.95 No Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 300 deg- 30.11 -34,86 -19,99 -1476.68 2576,32 -0,95 No Ice 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 330 deg- 40.15 -20,03 -34,73 -2561 21 1478.10 -0.33 No Ice 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 330 deg- 30.11 -2003 -34.73 -2544,97 146&71 -0.32 No Ice 1.2 Dead+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 68.11 0.00 0,00 -0,33 1.64 0,00 12Dead+1.0 Wind 0 deg+1.0 68.11 0.00 -6,83 -528A9 1.51 0.04 Ice+1.0 Temp 12Dead+LO Wind 30 deg+LO 68,11 3.54 -6,13 -469.81 -269.30 -0,05 Ice+1.0 Temp 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 60 deg+1.0 68,11 592 -3.42 -264.39 455,24 020 Ice+1.0 Temp 2 Dead+LO Wind 90 deg+1.0 68.11 6,79 -0,00 -OA7 -524.57 0,23 Ice+1.0 Temp 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 120 68,11 5.62 3,24 254.99 -440.34 0.14 deg+I D Ice+1.0 Temp 12 Dead+1.0 Wind 150 68,11 3,11 5,40 429.53 -246.20 0,00 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 12 Dead+1.0 Wind I80 68.11 -0.00 6.83 527,58 1.84 -0.D4 deg+l-0 Ice+l 0 Temp 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 210 68,11 -3.54 6.13 469,20 272.65 0,05 deg+l 0 Ice+1 0 Temp 12 Dead+1 0 Wind 240 68.11 -5 92 3.42 263,78 458.59 -0,20 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 1.2 Dead+LO Wind 270 68,11 -6,79 0,00 -0,14 527,93 -0,23 deg+1.0 Ice+1.0 Temp 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 300 68.11 -5.62 -3,24 -255.60 443.70 414 deg+1 0 Ice+1 0 Temp 1.2 Dead+1.0 Wind 330 68,11 -3,1 I -5 40 -430,13 249.56 -0.00 deg+1.0 Ice+1 0 Temp Dead+Wind 0 deg-Service 3346 0,02 -5,95 -431.29 -141 009 WxTower Job Page NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 13 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle tbowman FAX:(330)572-2101 Load Vertical Shear, Shear, Overturning Overturning Torque Combination Moment,M, Moment,M. K K K kip-ft kip-ft kip ft Dead+Wind 30 deg-Service 33.46 3.22 -5.55 -395.49 -229.94 OA8 Dead+Wind 60 deg-Service 33.46 5.18 -2.99 -216.77 -375.55 0.23 Dead+Wind 90 deg-Service 33,46 5.63 -0.02 -1.25 -414 49 0.21 Dead+Wind 120 deg-Service 3346 4,87 2.80 207,29 -361.45 0.14 Dead+Wind 150 deg-Service 33,46 2.80 4.85 357.14 -206,07 0.03 Dead+Wind 180 deg-Service 33.46 -0.02 5.95 431.53 1.34 -0.09 Dead+Wind 210 deg-Service 33,46 -322 5,55 395,74 229.87 -0.18 Dead+Wind 240 deg-Service 33,46 -5.18 2.99 217.02 375,48 -0,23 Dead+Wind 270 deg-Service 33.46 -5.63 002 1.50 414.42 -0.21 Dead+Wind 300 deg-Service 33.46 -4.87 -2,80 -207.05 361.39 -0.14 Dead+Wind 330 deg-Service 3346 -2,80 -4.85 -356.90 206.00 -0,03 Solution Summary Sum of Applied Forces Sum of Reactions Load PX PY PZ PX PY PZ %Error Comb. K K K K K K I 0.00 -33.46 0.00 0.00 33.46 0.00 0,000% 2 0.13 40A5 -42.59 -0.13 40,15 42,59 0.000% 3 0.13 .30,11 -42.59 -0.13 30.1I 42,59 0.000% 4 23.05 -40,15 -39.70 -23.05 40,15 39.70 0.000% 5 23.05 -30,11 -39,70 -23.05 30.11 39,70 0.000% 6 37.05 -40.15 -21.40 -37,05 40,15 21.40 0,000% 7 37.05 -30,11 -21.40 -37.05 30.11 2140 0,000% 8 4029 40A5 -0.13 4029 40.15 0.13 0,000% 9 4029 -30A I -0,13 4029 30.11 0.13 0.000% 10 34.86 -40A5 19,99 -34,86 40.15 -19.99 0,000% II 34.86 -30AI 19,99 -34,86 30.11 -19,99 O,000% 12 20.03 -40.15 34.73 -20,03 40.15 -34.73 0000% 13 2003. -30.11 34.73 -20,03 30,11 -34.73 0.000% 14 -0.13 -40AS 42.59 0.13 40.15 -42.59 0000% 15 -0.13 -30,11 42.59 0.13 30.11 42.59 0.000% 16 -23.05 -40,15 39.70 23.05 40.15 -39.70 0000% 17 -23 05 -30,11 39.70 23.05 30A I -39,70 0,000% 18 -37.05 -40.15 21.40 37,05 40,15 -21.40 0000% 19 -37,05 -30.11 2140 37.05 30,11 -2140 0,000% 20 -40.29 -40.15 0,13 4029 40.15 -0.13 0,000% 21 -40 29 -30.11 0.13 40.29 30.11 -0.13 0.000 22 -34.86 -40.15 -19.99 34.86 40.15 19.99 0.000% 23 -34.86 -30.11 -19,99 34,86 30.11 19.99 0.000% 24 -20.03 -40,15 -34,73 20,03 40,15 34.73 0000% 25 -20.03 -30.11 -34,73 20,03 30.11 34.73 0-000% 26 0.00 -68.11 0.00 0.00 68.11 0,00 0.000% 27 0.00 -68.11 -6.83 -0,00 68,11 6.83 0.000% 28 3,54 -68.11 -6.13 -3.54 68.1I 6,13 0.000% 29 592 -68.11 -3 42 -5.92 68,11 3.42 0.000 30 6.79 -68.11 -0.00 -6.79 68,11 0,00 0.000% 31 562 -68.11 3.24 -5.62 68.11 -3.24 0000% 32 111 -68.11 5.40 -3,11 68,11 -5.40 0.000% 33 -0,00 -68,11 6.83 0,00 68,11 -6,83 0.000% 34 -3,54 -68.11 6,13 3,54 68.11 -6,13 0.000% 35 -5.92 -68,11 3,42 5.92 68,11 -342 0.000% 36 -6.79 -68,11 0,00 6.79 68,11 -0.00 0.000% 37 -5.62 -68.11 -3.24 5.62 68.11 3.24 0.000% 38 -3.11 -68,11 -5 40 3.11 68,11 540 0.000% 39 0,02 -3346 -5.95 -0.02 3346 5.95 0,000% 40 322 -33.46 -5,55 -3,22 33.46 5.55 OD00% 41 5.18 -33 46 -2.99 -5,18 33,46 2,99 0.000% 42 5,63 -3346 -0.02 -5.63 3346 0.02 0.000% WxTower Job NY Page Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 14 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle FAX:(330)572-2101 tbOWlllan Sum of Applied Forces Sum of Reactions Load PX PY PZ PX PY PZ %Error Comb. K K K K K K 43 4,87 -33.46 2.80 487 33.46 -2.80 0.000% 44 2,80 -33.46 4.85 -2.80 33.46 -4.85 0.000% 45 -0,02 -33.46 5.95 0.02 33.46 -5.95 0.000% 46 -3,22 -33.46 5.55 3.22 33,46 -5.55 0.000% 47 -5.18 -3346 2,99 5.18 33,46 -2.99 0,000% 48 -5,63 -33.46 0.02 5.63 33.46 -0.02 0,000% 49 -4.87 -3346 -2.80 4.87 33.46 2.80 0,000% 50 -2,80 -33,46 -4.85 2.80 33.46 4.85 0.000% Non-Linear Convergence Results Load Converged? Number Displacement Force Combination of Cycles Tolerance Tolerance 1 Yes 4 0.00000001 0,00000001 2 Yes 4 0.00000001 0,00014788 3 Yes 4 0.00000001 0,00008032 4 Yes 5 0,00000001 0.00029929 5 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00010927 6 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00027423 7 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00010268 8 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00078894 9 Yes 4 0.00000001 000045242 10 Yes 5 0,00000001 0.00028819 II Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00011098 12 Yes 5 0,00000001 0.00026739 13 Yes 5 0.00000001 0,00010233 14 Yes 4 0.00000001 0,00016474 15 Yes 4 0.00000001 0,00008889 16 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00030058 17 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00010985 18 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00029468 19 Yes 5 0.00000001 000011183 20 Yes 4 0.00000001 000093829 21 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00053781 22 Yes 5 0.00000001 0,00026628 23 Yes 5 0.00000001 000010125 24 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00027864 25 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00010744 26 Yes 4 0.00000001 0,00000001 27 Yes 5 0.00000001 000015183 28 Yes 5 000000001 0.00017401 29 Yes 5 0.00000001 000016823 30 Yes 5 0,00000001 0.00015189 31 Yes 5 0.00000001 0,00016434 32 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00016044 33 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00015248 34 Yes 5 0,00000001 0.00017467 35 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00017043 36 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00015228 37 Yes 5 0.00000001 000016330 38 Yes 5 0.00000001 0.00016039 39 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00001427 40 Yes 4 000000001 0,00008413 41 Yes 4 000000001 0.00005838 42 Yes 4 0,00000001 0.00003076 43 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00007305 44 Yes 4 000000001 0,00005596 45 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00001409 46 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00006916 tnx over Job Page NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 15 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle tbowman FAX:(330)572-2101 47 Yes 4 0,00000001 000007899 48 Yes 4 0.00000001 000003128 49 Yes 4 0.00000001 000005498 50 Yes 4 0.00000001 0.00006377 Maximum Tower Deflections - Service Wind Section Elevation Hann Gov. Tilt Twist No. Deflection Load ft in Comb. o Ll 108.5-100.5 11,403 46 1.0042 0,0054 L2 100.5-100 9,731 46 0.9865 0,0050 L3 100-82,083 9.628 46 0.9853 0,0050 L4 82.083-702338 6.340 46 0.7207 0,0012 L5 73.3913-60.1667 5.083 46 0.6573 0.0010 L6 60.1667-33 7477 3.408 46 0.5370 0.0006 L7 37.8773-30.5 1.382 46 0,3318 0.0003 L8 30.5- 16.2083 0.902 46 0.2802 0.0002 L9 16,2083-12,9583 0262 46 0,1490 0.0001 LIO 12.9583-9 0.170 46 OA205 0.0001 LII 9-0 0-083 46 0,0889 0.0001 Critical Deflections and Radius of Curvature - Service Wind Elevation Appurtenance Gov, Deflection Tilt Twist Radius of Load Curvature ft Comb. in o ° ft 108,00 T-Arm Mount[TA 702-3] 46 11,298 1,0031 0,0054 20005 100.00 Platform Mount[LP 602-1] 46 9.628 0.9853 00050 8056 KOO T-Arm Mount[TA 602-3] 46 7.682 0.8537 0,0030 4196 80.00 Platform Mount[LP 305-11 46 6 021 06995 0.0011 4168 70.00 T-Ann Mount[TA 602-3] 46 4 627 0,6324 0.0009 8591 30.00 Pipe Mount[PM 601-11 46 0,873 0,2763 0.0002 6389 Maximum Tower Deflections - Design Wind Section Elevation Hor_. Gov. Tilt Twist No. Deflection Load ft in Comb. ° LI 108.5-100.5 81.537 16 7.1896 0.0378 L2 100.5-100 69.618 16 7.0625 0.0349 L3 100-82,083 68.883 16 7.0535 0.0348 L4 82.083-70,2338 45,413 16 5.1668 0,0079 L5 73.3913-60.1667 36.420 16 4.7131 0.0059 L6 60,1667-33,7477 24.432 16 3.8513 0 0037 L7 37.8773-30.5 9.907 16 2.3800 0.0017 L8 30.5-16 2083 6.468 16 2.0098 0.0014 L9 162083- 12.9583 1,876 16 1.0686 0.0006 LIO 12.9583-9 1.219 16 0,8645 0,0005 LI I 9-0 0.596 16 0.6375 0.0004 Critical Deflections and Radius of Curvature - Design Wind h1XTower Job Page NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 16 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main S1.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH 44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle tbowman FAX,(330)572-2101 Elevation Appurtenance Gov. Deflection Tilt Twist Radius of Load Curvature ft Comb. in o ft 108.00 T-Arm Mount[TA 702-3] 16 80.788 7.1817 0.0376 2913 100.00 Platform Mount[LP 602-11 16 68.883 7.0535 0.0348 1170 90.00 T-Arm Mount[TA 602-31 16 55.000 6.1154 0.0208 604 80,00 Platform Momt[LP 305-11 16 43.135 5.0154 0 0066 595 70.00 T-Arm Mount[TA 602-31 16 33,156 4,5351 0.0057 1216 3000 Pipe Mount[PM 601-11 16 6.260 L9818 0,0013 893 Compression Checks Pole Design Data Section Elevation Size L L. KI1r A P. +P„ Ratio No. P. ft ft ft in, K K +Pp LI 108.5-100.5 TP12xl2x0.375 8.00 0.00 0.0 13.6954 -0.84 43140 0.002 (1) L2 100.5-100(2) TP14.5x12x0.375 0.50 0.00 00 13,6954 -0.84 43140 0.002 L3 100-82,083 TP18.569lxl4.5x0.1875 17.92 0.00 00 11,0979 -4.74 785,97 0,006 (3) L4 82.083- TP212603x18.56910.7269 11.85 0.00 00 46.3823 -8.71 3418.84 0003 70 2338(4) L5 70.2338- TP22.7702x19.08940.7502 13,22 0.00 00 53.1925 -14.80 3920S2 0.004 60.1667(5) L6 60.1667- TP29.0368x22.7702x0.8909 26.42 0.00 0.0 77,9321 -22,69 5744.37 0004 33 7477(6) L7 33.7477-30.5 TP29.029lx26.2755x0.9002 7.38 0.00 0.0 78,0218 -25,57 5750.99 0.004 (7) L8 30.5-16.2083 TP32 2955x29.0291x0.8978 14,29 0.00 0.0 907681 -33 08 6690.52 0.005 (8) L9 16.2083- TP33.0383x32.2955x0.9036 3.25 0.00 0.0 93.4989 -34.58 6891,80 0.005 12.9583(9) L10 12.9583-9 TP33.943x33 0383x0.9784 3.96 0.00 0.0 103,853 -36.55 765502 0.005 (10) 0 1-11 9-0(11) TP36x33943x0.7501 9.00 0.00 00 85.1399 -40A2 6275.66 0,006 Pole Bending Design Data Section Elevation Size M: +M Ratio M y +M Ratio No. M mh ft nio-ft Wp-ft AM kip-ft kip-fi mM. LI 108.5-100.5 TP12xl2x0.375 25,37 133.07 0.191 0,00 133,07 0.000 (1) L2 100.5-100(2) TP14.5xl2x0.375 25,37 133,07 0.191 0.00 133.07 0.000 L3 100-82.083 TPI 8.5691 x14.5x0.1875 26746 293,67 0.911 0.00 293.67 0.000 (3) L4 82083- TP212603xl8.5691x0.7269 479.73 1341.93 0.357 0.00 1341,93 0,000 70 2338(4) L5 70.2338- TP22.7702x 19-0894x0 7502 88092 171443 0.514 000 1714.43 0.000 60-1667(5) L6 60.1667- TP29.0368x22.77024.8909 1671.84 3102.67 0,539 000 3102,67 0000 33.7477(6) L7 33.7477-30.5 TP29.0291 x26 2755x0 9002 1832.03 3075.76 0.596 000 3075,76 0,000 (7) L8 30 5-16.2083 TP32.2955x29.029 I x0 8978 2556.62 4193-62 0-610 000 419362 0 000 (8) WxTower Job Page NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 17 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle FAX. (330)572-2101 tbowman Section Elevation Sire Mx lI)m Ratio M, om� Ratio No. M. Mn ft kip-ft kip-ft 0M kip-j kip-ft bM L9 16.2083- TP33.0383x32.2955xO.9036 2698.32 4423.22 0.610 0.00 4423.22 0.000 12.9583(9) LIO 12.9583-9 TP33.94303.03830.9784 2873.87 5032,30 0,571 0,00 5032.30 OMO (10) L11 9-0(11) TP36x33.943xO.7501 3281,83 4447,82 0,738 000 4447.82 0,000 Pole Shear Design Data Section Elevation Size Actual V Ratio Actual +T Ratio No. V. V T. T. ft K K +V kip ft kip-f (I'T Ll 108.5-100.5 TP12xl2xO.375 3.44 215.70 0.016 0,54 202.31 0.003 (1) L2 100.5-100(2) TP14.5x12xO.375 3.51 262.09 0,013 0,51 202,31 0.003 L3 100-82,083 TP18.569lxl4.5xO.1875 17,65 392,98 0,045 0,27 595.47 0.000 (3) L4 82.083- TP212603x18.569lxO.7269 25,90 1709.42 0.015 0.35 2721.02 0.000 70.2338(4) L5 70.2338- TP22.7702x19.0894xO.7502 32.91 1960.41 0.017 0.37 3476.32 0.000 60.1667(5) L6 60.1667- TP29.0368x2237020.8909 38.22 2872.19 0.013 0.13 6291,24 0,000 33 7477(6) L7 33.7477-30.5 TP29.029I x26 2755xO 9002 39,64 2918,66 0 014 025 6236.67 0.000 (7) Lit 30.5-162083 TP322955x29.0291xO.8978 43.29 3345.26 0.013 OM 8503.33 0.000 (8) L9 16.2083- TP330383x32.2955xO.9036 43.95 3445,90 0.013 0.67 8968,92 0,000 12.9583(9) LIO 12.9583-9 TP33-94303-0383xO.9784 4478 382751 0012 075 10203.92 0,000 (10) L11 9-0(11) TP36x33.94307501 45-93 313783 0,015 075 9018,83 0,000 Pole Interaction Design Data Section Elevation Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Comb. Allow. Criteria No. P. M M4 V T. Stress Stress ft ClP $MN OM $y QT Ratio Ratio Ll 108.5-100.5 0.002 0.191 0,000 0.016 0.003 OA93 1.000 4821/ (1) V L2 100.5-100(2) OM2 0.191 0,000 0,013 0 003 0,193 1.000 4 8 2 L3 100-82,083 OM6 0.911 0.000 0,045 0.000 0,919 1.000 4.82 (3) L4 82 083- 0.003 0,357 0.000 0.015 0.000 0.360 1.000 4,81 70.2338(4) L5 70.2338- 0,004 0514 0 000 0.017 0,000 0.518 1,000 4,82 60.1667(5) V L6 60.1667- 0004 0.539 0.000 OD13 0,000 0.543 1,000 482 33,7477(6) 1/ L7 33,7477-30.5 0.004 0.596 0.000 0.014 0.000 0.600 1 000 48,2 (7) V L8 30.5-16,2083 0.005 0.610 0.000 0.013 0,000 0.615 1 000 4,82 �/ tnxTower Job NY Cutchogue, BU#: 806579 Page18 of 18 GPD Group Project Date 520 South Main St.;Suite 2531 2012775.806579.01 12:36:50 04/19/12 Akron,OH44311 Client Designed by Phone:(330)572-2100 Crown Castle tbowman FAX;(330)572 2101 Section Elevation Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Comb. Allow. Criteria No. P. M My V. T„ Stress Stress ft +P„ +M +M �V tT. Ratio Ratio (8) V/ L9 16.2083- 0,005 0.610 0,000 0.013 0,000 0.615 1,000 4,81 ✓ 129583(9) ✓ LI O 12.9583-9 0.005 0.571 0.000 0.012 0.000 0.576 1,000 482 ✓ (10) ✓ L11 9-0(11) 0006 0.738 0.000 OD15 0,000 0.744 1.000 482 ✓ Section Capacity Table Section Elevation Component Sice Critical P op".. % Pass No. ftt Type Element K K Capacity Fail LI 108.5-100.5 Pole TP12xl2xO.375 1 -0.84 431.40 19.3 Pass L2 100.5-100 Pole TP14.5xl2xO.375 2 -0.84 431,40 19.3 Pass L3 100-82,083 Pole TPI8.5691x14.5x0.1875 3 -4.74 785.97 91.9 Pass L4 82,083-10 2338 Pole+Reinf TP2 1.2603x18.5691xO.7269 4 -8.71 3418,84 51.9* Pass L5 70.2338- Pole+Reinf TP227702xI 9.0894xO.7502 5 -14.80 3920.82 72.3* Pass 60,1667 L6 60.1667- Pole+Reinf TP29.0368x22.7702xO.8909 6 -22.69 5744.37 76.3* Pass 33.7477 L7 33,7477-30.5 Pole+Reinf TP29.029Ix26 2755x0 9002 7 -25.57 5750.99 77,1* Pass L8 30.5-16 2083 Pole+Reinf. TP32.2955x29.029 IxO.8978 8 -33,08 6690,52 85.4* Pass L9 162083- Pole+Reinf TP3 3.0383x32.295 5xO.9036 9 -34.58 6891,80 86.8* Pass 12.9583 LIO 12,9583-9 Pole+Reinf TP33.943x33.0383xO.9784 10 -36.55 765502 81.4* Pass Lll 9-0 Pole+Reinf TP36x33.943xO.7501 II -40.12 6275.66 104.5* Pass Summary Pole(L 11) 104.5 Pass RATING= 104.5 Pass *Refer to Appendix C for calculations supporting the%capacity used. Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012 100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/8.5'Extension Structural Analysis CCI BU No 806579 Project Number 2012775.806579.01,Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 9 APPENDIX B BASE LEVEL DRAWING tnxTower Report-version 6.0.4.0 CROWN REGION FYpRH E.R eSFNLPO) 1)1/x' tx)l/e'm m rt LflEL • �) /•m a rt lEE 12)T/e•)ro ro rt LE1L •••• 0 e/e•m IN rt mow. Tx)vp•)ro a IT M. �jA / \\ \ • e 1 Y[s !iie 1 1!!e ��(•• � u Q 1 •� f11 Iff i � N o I �• �! lol� �! ! � NOF eEeN-M) ii��• �\ /� •i N1eD) j! I 1 I(<xa) /e•m w n yea ••�•• \ W 1 A' (rsrwua) •• • \ / � ro IN rt ICEu EN BY EN O BITE NVF9ER: 0 Nr COTCNOOGEM2W 0 WF6)e �.RWGO SCB CC..�iLL SIiE PCORE55 SY FFOIY.CgMTF NF BASE LEVEL FSHEETHUMBER BASE LEVEL DRAWING 7 Al-0 Crown Castle USA Inc April 19, 2012 100 Ft Modified Monopole Tower w/8.5'Extension Structural Analysis CC/BU No 806579 Project Number 2012775.806579.01,Application 145544, Revision 2 Page 10 APPENDIX C ADDITIONAL CALCULATIONS tnxTower Report-version 6.0.4.0 /6 Reinforced Monopole Analysis ��- NY Cutchogue BU:806579 G P D G R O U p 2012775.806579.01 Code= TIA-222-G-2 AISF= 1 Max Capacity= 1.05 Y of Sides= 12 P30-6 3 U "73,5787 20.5386 0.1675 '65' r 16 479.73 8.71 25.9 0.36 39.4% 51.9% Pass MP30.8 3 'L5 80.1887 22.9987 0.2812S M* 0.6 16 680.92 14.8 32.91 - 0.37 50.8% 72.3% Pass SP 91 3 Le 37.8773 28.093 0.28125 65 0.8 16 1671.84 22.69 38.22 013 0 56.6% 73.7% Pass MP30.6 3. L6 37.8773 28.093 0.28126 65 0.8 18 1671.84 22.69 30.22 013 56.6% 76.3% Pass BP 9x0.75 3 U 30.5 29.0291 0.3126 as 0.8 is is32.03 25.57 39.64 025 a= 55.9% 74.8% Pass MP30.6 3 L7 30.5 29.0291 0.3125 65 0.8 16 1832.03 25.57 39.64 025 55.9% 77.1% Pass BP 9x0.75 3 L8 16.2083 32.2955 0.3125 65 0.8 16 2556.62 33.08 43.29 06 :'q... 8 65.1% 83.9% Pass MP30.8 3 LB 16.2083 32.2955 0.3126 65 0.8 18 2556.62 33.08 43.29 06 __.o:8973 65.1% 85.4% Pass BP 9x0.75 3 L9 12,9583 33.0383 0.3125 65 os 18 2698.32 34.58 43.95 0.67 0' 63.4% 84.1% Pass MP30.8 3 L9 12.9583 33.0383 0.3125 65 0.8 18 2698.32 34.58 43.95 067 r'Q' 634% 86.8% Pass BP 9x0.75 3'.- L10 9 33.943 0.3125 65 0.8 18 2873.87 36.55 44.76 0.75 69.1% 70.5% Pass MP30.8 3 L10. 9 33.943 0.3125 65 0.8 16 287387 36.55 44.78 0.75 .,,0.8784 69.1% 81.4% Pass BP 9x0.75 3 L11 0 36 0.3125 65 0.5 16 3281.83 40.12 45.93 075 ,1.., 7 65.0% 88.4% Pass MP30.6 3 L11r 0 36 0.3125 65 0.8 18 3281.83 40.12 45.93 075 "y'01601 85.0% 104.5% Pass GPO Modified Monopole Analysis-V1.00 520 South Main Street•Suite 2531•Akron,Ohio 443111 PHONE 330 572 2100•FAx 330,572 2101 ' GPD GROUP job:2012775.806579.01 Calculated By TB date 4/19/2012 Engineers•Anbitece•Planners Sheer NnyOf 1 Checked By_AH date 4/19/2012 GPD GROUP ANCHOR ROD TRANSFORMATION Rev.G) Momentfrom RISA(M)= 3282 kip-ft Axial from RISA(A)= 40.12 kip $hear from RISA(V)= 45.93 Kip eta(n)= 0.5 Existing Rod Diameter 2.25 in. Distance from neutral ads(it)= 22 in.(CAD) Existing Rod Area(A,J= 3.98 in.' Fy 75 ksl Number Existing Rods(nE) 8 Fir 100 ksi Modified Rod(1)Diameter 2.01 In.. Distance from neutral axis(it)= 23.5 In(CAD) Modified Rod Area(Am )= 3.17 In.' Fy 127 ksi Number Modified Rods HIM) 4 Fu 150 ksi Modified Rod(2)Diameter 2.79 in.' Distance from neutral ads(it)= 26.385 In.(CAD) ModlOed Rod Area(A..N)= 6.21 In.' Fy 127 ksi Number Modified Rods HW) 4 Fu 150 ksi 'Taken from Cal spec shoat Inoi,= 19608.10 in' (Combined MOl of existing and post installed rods determined in CAD,Existing&Modified(2)Anchor Rod Capacity Controlling) I,aep1= 17576.89 in' (Combined MCI of existing and post installed rods determined in(AD,Modified(1)Anchor Rod Capacity Controlling) f.= 175.86 kips (M'(d)'A.)/I,a„ra (Mod 1)fee,= 166,91 kips (M'(d)'A•Wn)/I„t,iun+V/((nE+nM,+oM2)"333) (Mod 2)f M= 323,79 kips (M"(d)'A.,,,)/ImpYOI+V/((nE+nM,+nMl)'.333) Ax,,= 2.32 kips A'(A.)/(A:nE+nA,,dlO nMpi+nE+nAmadol'nM(,I) (Mod 1)As,,,N= 1.64 kips A'(nA„„ntl)//(A.'nE+nAmod,t,-nM,O+nE+nAmodul nMpl) (Mod 2)Axnad= 3,55 kips A'(nA„„dr,)//(A.*nE+nAmod01'nMlO+nE+nAmod(tI'nMltl) Total= 40.12 kips Ve' 2.65 kips A'(A.)/(Aa,"nE+nA,,,,,,tl nMhl+nE+nAmodlzl'nM01) (Mod 1)V,N= 2,11 kips A'(nA,.d,tl)//(A'nE+nAmodltl'nM,tl+nE+,Amodp,'nMpl) (Mod 2)Vi 4.07 kips A'(nA„ 21)//(A."nE+nAmodoj nMlp+nE+nAmodp,'nM(4) Total= 45,93 kips Maximum compressive force in existing rods= 178.18 kips(f„+Ax,x,) Maximum compressive force in modification(1)rods= 168.75 kips(fcn,+Axa,ad) Maximum compressive force in modification(2)rods= 327.34 kips(fa,ad+Axn,ad) Ultimate Axial Strength:Existing Rods(fix)= 260.00 kips Ultimate Axial Strength:Modification(1)Rods(ftn,od)= 309.60 kips Ultimate Axial Strength:Modification(2)Rods(ft,nod)= 592.90 kips(based on pull test load of 502 kips referenced in PMI by GPD dated 8/26MO) Modification Rod(1)Rating= 55.9% Modification Rod(2)Rating= 56.6% Square, Stiffened / Unstiffened Base Plate, Any Rod Material - Rev. F /G Assumptions: 1)Rod groups at corners. Total#rods divisible by 4. Maximum total#of rods=48(12 per Comer). 2)Rod Spacing=Straight Center-to-Center distance between any(2)adjacent rods(same corner) 3)Clear space between bottom of leveling nut and top of concrete not exceeding(1)'(Rod Diameter) Site Data Base Reactions 806579 BU#. TIA Revision: G Site Name: NYCutchogue Factored Moment, Mu:l 1250.77 ft-kips App#: 145544 Rev. 2 Factored Axial,Pu: 18.56 kips Anchor Rod Data Factored Shear,Vu: 21.2 ki s Eta Factor, n 0.5 TIA G(Fig.4-4) Note: Reactions have been modified to account Qty: 8 for modifications Diam: 2.25 in Anchor Rod Results Rod Material: A615J TIA G-->Max Rod(Cu+Vu/q): 178.2 Kips Yield, Fy: 75 ksi Axial Design Strength,m`Fu`Anet: 260.0 Kips Strength,Fu: 100 ksi Anchor Rod Stress Ratio: 68.5% Pa,.s Bolt Circle: 44 in Anchor Spacing: 6 In Plate Data Base Plate Results Flexural Check PL Ref. Data W=Side: 42 in Base Plate Stress: 43.9 ksi Yield Line(in): Thick: 2.2.5 in PL Design Bending Strength,m'Fy: 54.0 ksi 23.40 Grade: 60 ksi Base Plate Stress Ratio: 81.3% 355 Max PL Length: Clip Distance: 6 in 23.40 N/A-Unstiffened Stiffener Data(Welding at both sides) Stiffener Results Configuration: Unstiffened Horizontal Weld : N/A Weld Type: Vertical Weld: N/A Groove Depth: in" Plate Flex+Shear,fb/Fb+(fv/Fv)A2: N/A Groove Angle: degrees Plate Tension+Shear,f/Ft+(fv/Fv)A2: N/A Fillet H.Weld: <—Disregard Plate Comp. (AISC Bracket): N/A Fillet V.Weld: in Pole Results Width: in Pole Punching Shear Check: N/A Height: in Mom PL Length Thick: in read une Notch: in n A^°"°° 1= BASE Pr Grade: ksi Day/4/ THICKNESS Weld str.: Iksi gA^eb "p / Snrrcnco CDNrmuwAnoN Asl MED IN Toot Pole Data �� / a` Diann, 36 Thick: 0.3125 In c(A. + I Cleo se°ce Grade: 65 ksi / Anch°r` B,C, Case #of Sides: 12 .,o„IF Round s 00 'r?F P°Ie w/ DIAM = D Anehpr Sp°sing A— Ae Stinen r Spacing, E—I,H for Sigel, Comer Anchor (Input Cii °r Space) Nate:for complete joint penetration groove welds the groove depth must be exactly 1 the stiffener thickness for calculation purposes CClplate 1.5-Square Base F-G 1.2,Effective March 19,2012 Analysis date:4/19/2012 Stiffened or Unstiffenedr an9 Exterior Fl a Plate - Any Bolt Material TIA Rev G Reactions Bolt Threads: Site Data Mu 33.63 ft-kips X-Excluded BU#: 806579 Axial, Pu: 1.12 kips Vn= 0.55*Ab*Fu Site Name: NYCutchogue Shear,Vu: 4.68 kips (p=0.75, W*Vn(kips): App#: 145544 Rev. 2 Elevation: 100 feet 40.50 Pole Manufacturer: O-th-e—r---1 If No stiffeners,Criteria: I TIA G <-Only Applcable to Unstiffened Cases Flange Bolt Results Non-Ri id Bolt Data Bolt Tension Capacity, (p*Tn,B1: 56.81 kips �'Tn Qty: d2575 Ad'usted T Tn(due to Vu=Vu/Qty), B: 56.81 kips �Tnl(1-(V"TIP 1.2]"0.5 Diameter(in.): Bolt Fu: 125 Max Bolt directly applied Tu: 5.13 Kips Bolt Material: Bolt Fy: 105 Min. PL"tc"for B cap.w/o Pry: 2.806 in Strength(Fu): ksi Min PL"trec"for actual T w/Pry: 0.654 in Yield (Fy): ksi Min PL 11"for actual T w/o Pry: 0.843 in Circle in. : T allowable with Prying: 29.98 kips 0_<a':51 case Prying Force,q: 0.00 kips Plate Data Total Bolt Tension=Tu+q: 5.13 kips Diam: 28.5 in Prying Bolt Stress Ratio=(Tu+q)/(B): 9.0% Pass Thick,t: 1.75 in Grade(Fy): 50 ksi Exterior Flange Plate Results Flexural Check Non-Ri id Strength, Fu: 65 ksi Compression Side Plate Stress: 5.1 ksi TIA G Single-Rod B-eff: 3.14 in Allowable Plate Stress: 45.0 ksi m*Fy Compression Plate Stress Ratio: 11.4% > s;s comp.Y.L. Length: Stiffener Data(Weldingat Both Sides) No Prying 22.78 Config: 0 Tension Side Stress Ratio, (treq/t)A2: 14.0% ?-: Weld Type: Groove Depth: in** n/a Groove Angle: degrees Stiffener Results Fillet H.Weld: <-- Disregard Horizontal Weld : n/a Fillet V.Weld: in Vertical Weld: n/a Width: in Plate Flex+Shear,fb/Fb+(fv/Fv)A2: n/a Height: in Plate Tension+Shear,ft/Ft+(fv/Fv)A2: n/a Thick: n Plate Comp. (AISC Bracket): n/a Notch: in Pole Results Grade: ksi Pole Punching Shear Check: n/a Weld str.: ksi Pole Data Diam: 12 in Thick: 0.375 in Grade: 35 ksi #of Sides: 0 "0"IF Round Fu 63 ksi c di' ri Feint Fillet Weld 0 "0"if None , c '0=none, 1 =every bolt,2=every 2 bolts,3=2 per bolt "Note:for complete joint penetration groove welds the groove depth must be exactly 1/2 the stiffener thickness for calculation purposes CClplate 1.5-Ext Flange G 1.3, Effective March 19, 2012 Analysis Date:4/19/2012 Stiffened or Unstiffened, Exterior Flange Plate -Any Bolt Material TIA Rev G Reactions Bolt Threads: Site Data Mu 33.63 Tkips X-Excluded BU#: 806579 Axial,Pu: 1.12 kips cpVn= (0.55*Ab'Fu Site Name: NYCutchogue Shear,Vu: 4.68 1kips =0.75, *Vn (kips): App#: 145544 Rev. 2 Elevation: 100 1 feet 40.50 Pole Manufacturerl IlMostiffeners,entena: I TIA G <-Only Applicable to Unstiffened Cases Flange Bolt Results i on-Rigid Bolt Data Bolt Tension Capacity, (p*Tn,B1: 56.81 kips I cp'Tn Qty: 12 Ad'usted 1p*Tn (due to Vu=Vu/Qty), B: 56.81 kips cpTn[(1-(vu/(pvn)-2]-o.5 Diameter(in.): 1 Bolt Fu: 125 Max Bolt directly applied Ti 5.13 Kips Bolt Material: Other Bolt Fy: 105 Min. PL"tc"for B cap.w/o Pry: 2.289 in Strength(Fu): 125 ksi Min PL"tred'for actual T w/Pry: 0.524 in Yield(Fy): 105 ksi Min PL 11"for actual T w/o Pry: 0.688 in Circle(in. : 25.75 T allowable with Prying: 39.53 kips 05a'51 case Prying Force, q: 0.00 kips Plate Data Total Bolt Tension=Tu+q: 5.13 kips Diam: 28.5 in Prying Bolt Stress Ratio=(Tu+q)/(B): 9.0% Pass Thick,t: 1.75 in Grade(Fy): 50 ksi Exterior Flange Plate Results Flexural Check Non-Rigid Strength, Fu: 65 ksi Compression Side Plate Stress: 4.1 ksi TIA G Single-Rod B-eff: 3.89 in Allowable Plate Stress: 45.0 ksi W'Fy Compression Plate Stress Ratio: 9.2% P ,s Comp.V.L. Length: Stiffener Data(li"Iding at Both Sides) No Prying 21.28 Config: 0 Tension Side Stress Ratio, (treq/t)A2: 9.0% F:azs Weld Type: Groove Depth: in** n/a Groove Angle: degrees Stiffener Results Fillet H.Weld: <--Disregard Horizontal Weld: n/a Fillet V.Weld: in Vertical Weld: n/a Width: in Plate Flex+Shear,fb/Fb+(fv/Fv)A2: n/a Height: in Plate Tension+Shear,fUFt+(fv/Fv)A2: n/a Thick: in Plate Comp. (AISC Bracket): n/a Notch: in Pole Results Grade: ksi Pole Punching Shear Check: n/a Weld str.: ksi Pole Data Diam: 14.5 in - Thick: 0.1875 in Grade: 65 ksi #of Sides: 12 "0"IF Round Fu 80 ksi Reinf. Fillet Weld 0 "0"if None 0=none, 1 =every bolt,2=every 2 bolts,3=2 per bolt Note:for complete joint penetration groove welds the groove depth must be exactly 1/2 the stiffener thickness for calculation purposes CClplate 1.5-Ext Flange G 1.3, Effective March 19, 2012 Analysis Date:4/19/2012 • Mat Foundation Analysis /'. NY Cutchogue, BUM 806579 2012775.806679.01 GPD GROUP Code >-.TIA-222-G Qxmax 2.69 ksf 1.2D+1.6W Bearing On Sol Qymax 2.69 ksf 1.2D+1.6W Foundation Type Mono Pad Qmax@45' 2.69 ksf 1.2D+1.6W Pier Type Mound Qi.n G... 8.37 ksf Reinforcing Known :`-k:Yes Controlling Capacity 32.2% Pass Max Capacity 1.1 FS(ot)x 2.09 >1.0 0.9D+1.6W Moment,M 3357710667 k-ft FS(ot)y 2.09 >1.0 0.9D+1.6W Axial,P 40 k Controlling Capacity 49.0% Pass Shear,V 46 k P M Pier Diameter,0 6 ft V_� Pad Length,L 20.5 ft HIS Pad Width,W 20.5 ft Pad Thickness,t 4 ft Depth,D 10 ft D Height Above Grade,HG 2.. ft t Rebar Fy 60 ksi L"W Concrete Fc' 3.5 ksi Y Clear Cover 3 in Reinforced Top&Bottom? Yes Pad Reinforcing Size #8 i Pad Quantity Per Layer 18 Pier Rebar Size #11 Pier Quantity of Rebar 24 I -� K Soil Type Cohesive Soil Unit Weight 115.5 pcf — Cohesion,Cu 2.5 ksf Bearing Type Net Ultimate Bearing 10 ksf Water Table Depth 52 ft Frost Depth 4.17 ft GPD Mat Foundation Analysis-V3.01 LU LLI W s V! Z C W — P 0 o � ow � LL wireless W r m NZ L Ur WEST NYACK, NEW YORK z N w z a fju U w W p O Z U a O W O LL LL FACILITY 0 WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONSN W W W W W K K K K LL' CUTCHOGUE a fA e 21855 COUNTRY ROAD EAST ( C . R. 48 ) a J L w K 0 uwin a CUTCHOGUE , NY 11935 0 �o � W > QQ0 N U two Q rn W a U m > a 0 m w J a Y LIST OF DRAWINGS LL ` ❑ a UO 9 _ Q ❑ U 1 TITLE SHEET INDEX _ _ W z In SITE INFORMATION T o o IIII, IuII„ ',, Inra , if ,,',, o VW SITE NAME. CUTCHOGUE I,II, °' ""r°qm ' _ _ L.. „ 1'u A 1 PLANS AND DETAILS VW SITE NUMBER: NY274 m U w W ~ 00 PROJECT LOCATION: 132 SOUND AVENUE " "'° ,�'��I�I'II a .VI 0 ° 24m I'i) ,I tlwl ", Idlllr,got!'' u r I' u n ,,,, .w Io aria n MATTITUCK, NY 11952 �Iu' II C-1 ANTE ,!„„ ,II h II ,,,III Nd A ' sill „ NNA 1 O m o SITE TYPE/DESCRIPTION: REPLACE (9) EXISTING ANTENNAS If ,Il lil ' ii ',, mill . AT EXISTING LOCATIONS I) '! I. MW+' IVJ u II,I ,; r'I III P.II. : Ili ADD NEW LTE CABINET IN EXISTING III, epIl i , , P „ I �o9! i L mOEQUIPMENT SHELTER i '7 BUILDING CONTACT. CROWN ATLANTIC DICK WEYRHETTER _ O Y LEASING CONTACT: O (576) 739-4629 ,'11 w ill i'I ' 111 d ' I'll ' .,u 6 OCCUPANCY OR LU CONSTRUCTION CONTACT: PETE McCARTHY 11 I' ' ' I �'14' USE IS UNLAWFUL z z III II III I' u (631) 649-2730 I 11 '� III ,� LU ~ I WITHOUT CERTIFICATE v w ENGINEER CONTACT: SCOT M. CHASSE IIIIII I ) dI IIL " V OF OCCUPANCY 850-663-1697 I1' I �li '�I, �i I11 uuIIIII i,.,,Cuw IJ .I�'IIG�I�IIi ,p I ', i ' 1 I, b 1 11 1 Iltlll,� l o n „t- A n I yaw 1 e„ I' ,I un ' LONGITUDE: 72° 29' 50.3 W DISTRICT: �0001 46. I ELEVATION 55 AMSL — "r�lID4 II. "! I ' APPROVED AS NOTED 11' V n II JII�I II I ' Ir, r'117 Ir DATED? - �'B.P # 37383 I SECTION: 096 �p JJ z BLOCK: 001 '((IIII FEEW6�'"� BY a il�„ I �I IIII NOTIFY BUILDING DEPA NT AT Q� w °2 O LOTS: 19.1 „',� III Mkt ,, ..,il ,� ,� �t;'F U �I ,!� ZONE: "LI" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ' ''' " ' / '' '�h��l"' o li 7651802 S AM TO 4 PM FOR THE IJJ K e FOLLOWING INSPECTIONS: ❑ � U r0 ^ a 1 u ,I kW IIII hill ;,i r' . FOUNDATION-TWO REQUIRED Z U M Ill IIIJ ! kW '' ,I� FOR POURED CONCRETE — o I, 'I Ihp + ,pl! '�tl; 2 ROUGH-FRAMING,PLUMBING, I MM II I� I;,,I I' IIII ', ! ,,' STRAPPING, ELECTRICAL&CAULKING z w0 � a hl b r " ,I1,1' a W ° Lr, 11 0 �,I )Itl�1�n IIII i' J 1 8. INSULATION .. u III IIII � '' 'II II I 1 W ❑ °; "I°II 'I 4, FINAL�CONSTRUCTION&ELECTRICAL ❑ a a ni0��dlHi '!ka,1 J )' I. III t1, MUST BE COMPLETE FOR C.O. N D a 4 ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET THE a' ^ 4 (LOCATION MAP VICINITY MAP REOUIRATE. NOTTS RESPONSIBLE CODES FOR NEW Q YORK STATE. NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION ERRORS. NITS SCALE: 1" =500' OF NEW �'w� IA Cyq 9 ELECTRICAL INSPECTION REQUIRED ! a.Oq b Bg03 y2 verizon �i gOFE5510�P "�'nmmn,,umwn,l1" " ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODES OF NEW YORK STATE. ZONING TABLE: CUTCHOGUE "LI" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT EXISTING COMPOUND ACCESS GATE (NP 5PU APPROVED FUTURE ITEM REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED UFF R PE ia^ CO- BUFFER CA ❑ o 0 MAX. HEIGHT (FT) .. .,,,,, ..... 80 ... . 112 5L (1) NC . .,... MIN. LOT AREA (SF) „ ...,. ... ....,, 40,000 45 589- .. NO .., REPLACE i 1 L � � 1 .5 0 MIN. LOT WIDTH (FT) ...,,, .,,. . .. 100 Y68,17m NO ...., EXISTING LESSEE >� >� v L i — Q J -� MIN LOT DEPTH (FT) ... .. .... 150 263.16m NO ' M IIN[MUM FRONT YARD SETBACK(FT) .,, 100' .. 75 .. NO . ... GPS ANTENNAS LECTRIC METER '^ MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK-ONE(FT) 20 152- . .. NO (TYP2 2-PL.) w Z E z a EXISTING _ LESSEE M INIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK- BOTH (FT) ... 40 45.1- INC ., .. * GENERATOR Z ❑ I, F =' y SIECOR FIBER F On MINIMUM REAR YARD SETBACK ( ...,. ... .. 70 ..._ *111±... NC .. . .... F JF- C � p AJD VRE 1b' TFI Q C NIAX LOT COVERAGE ..... .... ... ....... 30 45 62±*.. NC .,, ..,,. a Z P Z I I 8 BATTERY RACK ELEC ATS J EXISTING LESSEE No D Z a j ? EENT ^ b,� (H — J a ¢ NA = NOT APPLICABLE NO = NO CHANGE ELECTRIC METER Tom( •7 a Z O Z O `�" EXISTING DIMENSIONAL NON-CONFORMITY N O D F" O O w EXHAUST w LIL97-423-Y 44 , rd O a X w o (1)TOTAL HEIGHT TO APPROVED FUTURE TOWER EXTENSION AND ANTENNAS FAN ° 8 O CABLE RACEWAY � w pUTE4 w ~ (9 _w ZO0 � wO Nm� 000 � o• �S'v Rpp p Cp w m a 6 ¢ w — MOO MOD AC ACK ACK m r L a,oe ao -- - - - - - w � z ° ¢ ra - ---- — -- - - -- QQz IMP 30" �, r W W p IX-102`� ` F HVAC CONTRO a EA iS 25° 5� N J Z ❑ DESK LS m QO ' Oa EXIST I. I ) SRT ENTRY GPS ANTENNA HVAC GPS ANTENNA PANELA �l I" J Iin yl I; Z w TAL EXHAUST VENT = O N EXISTING PROPER 4, „IJ COAX CABLES RUN IN ME PROPERTY LINE I 342- vi DUCT FROM LESSEE SHELTER TO w Z ' y / 4 EXISTING MONOPOLE ? w W NOISE CERTIFICATION: u o�o % THE INSTALLATION OF THE NEW LTE CABINET IS WITH IN S K J THE CONFINES OF THE EXISTING EQUIPMENT SHELTER Z 0 w I I AND WILL THEREFORE NOT CREATE ANY INCREASE IN Q GEXISTING Y05'-7/z'm AGL F EXISTING 24'X24' MONOPOLE NOISE LEVELS AT THE EXISTING FACILITY. p c COVERED CABLE a. 'I BRIDGE W/(12) %' Ls(EECTOR EXISTING LESSEE ALPHA, BETA, AND GAMMA2COAXIAL CABLES PANEL ANTENNAS 4. @ 105'-T AGL TO BE REPLACED W/(9) NEW PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED U R > TO EXISTING MASTS w w uu iu SHELTER PLAN I l COMPOUND PLANS -1 SCALE : u/fi" = 1'-0" Y 3 .� SCALE : 1" =10'-0" a 29 9" GRAPHIC SCALE r Cn w 10 20 <0 O M N N > a O m I Lu J w I N I c FEET) w 0 N/F c H 1lnch= 10 fi = rt D EXISTING LOTHARRIS O F- w 2 u ' BUILDING ' N L) 6i m o >' O w WLN D CAPPER V O EXTEN > i Omr Nlw m YW N J F- Z Y a m z (9) EXISTING LESSEE ALPHA, BETA, AND GAMMA Q O U y� O 'q v SECTOR PANEL ANTENNAS [@ 105'-T AGL TO BE REPLACED W/(9) NEW PANEL ANTENNAS m `r MOUNTED TO EXISTING MASTS W o ° Q� N A ` EXISTING MICROWAVE ANTENNA 0 p Z IE a Z ¢ I- Fw O OJ I m I AMPHENOL AMPHENOL F u o o r (7 EXISTING 100' MONOPOLE w u PAVED J J BXA-701090/4CF (LTE) BXA-171090�SCF(PCS) U to u r u I. AREA Q 1 m yp '� I;' WITH A 2' REVEAL AT BASE ' - , 11 h 112016s 11 ,0 Ibs I 0 {p f .'2 64 SF 2 0a SF �!1 I N O G J N O N w DOm V! N- c, u ? a 0) QQ p J (J3 E. ❑ O ' Z N Q L w wt Q I O EXISTING FENCED COMPOUND 0 r � O U � o a � 31 EXISTING LESSEE 12'x26' EQUIP ENT SHELTER W/(2) I w Q W U m Q _ EXISTING LESSEE EQUIPMENT SHELTER o C. 1 ¢ m w n- m 0 r � REPLACE EXISTINGAS (TYPLESSEE 2-PL) B 0" � p4l 0 Q GPS A TENNA&(2) /z' ¢ ~ O QrCOAXI L CABLES _ f U w Q p On Z w m o GPS AIVTENNAB P 2-PLJ 6 1" a 1" LU z ' DIT 0 F U w Q F W EXISTING LESSEE GENERATOR FRONT TOP SIDE FRONT TOP SIDE ,� W U) 110 5± O ¢ Z az ,. EXISTING LESSEE (12) PORT ENTRY PANEL O W APPROVED FUTURE EQUIPMENTTO R = LDc ¢ Z w Q Z - WITH (12) %` ANDREW COAX CABLES RUN r ww h Z N ¢ w I- IN METAL DUCT FROM LESSEE SHELTER PANEL ANTENNAS i I F O LL N p ¢ Q f TO EXISTING MONOPOLE OLq ; z U ¢ j EXISTING NEXTEL EQUIPMENT SHELTER q 4 ¢ "' w z ¢ II EXISTING TELCO CABINET PCTEL A-1 Q 1' GPS-TMG-HR-2N EXIST ~ Q w N EXISTING T-MOBILE EQUIPMENT PAD POLE ' ', •I- TO R = 142 5Y _ �` 3 5" MONO- `� 4,XISTING MONOPOLE " w Z I m TOR 42.5'± .. ., it o 15.2,, N ® PP AGL 23010.'0d` E,� X X ail k x — EXISTING 10 X' NI" MONOPOLE W/APPROVED _ 8� �X w w m V ` EXTENSION TO 108-11"' X —X Yi i W K o o W EXIST " _ _ _ rJ J /� X — ..-... h, W ° L N Z YO EQUIP, ,�—�—`— - - _ -- - �- - - - � .................. ..A r I+ X �X OFo"4 TO EXIST MONO-% + �X m O 00 e O POLE To R .. —X N/F GPS ANTENNAS Z w w o �X TOWN OF SOUTHOLD w as �X SITE PLAN REFERENCE: °a =LOT 17 a�X EXIST. EQUIP TO R .3 iX 1 CUTCHOGUE SITE, NEW SITE PLAN AND DETAILS, COUNTY ..I a X �X ROUTE 48, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW d Y YORK PREPARED F09 NYNEX MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS STRUCTURAL NOTE: SITE PLAN a COMPANY REV1, DATED Y17 AS BUILT. PREPARED WESTERN ELEVATION PLEASE TED BY HERS. V AL ANALYSIS SCALE : 1�� = AO�-O" BY EDWARDS AND KELCEY, INC.IVC 70 SOUTH ORANGE .1 COMPLETED BY OTHERS. AVAILABLE UNDER AVENUE, LIVINGSTOIV, NEW JERSEY 07039 � 1 SCALE . T-W SEPARATE COVER. 2. DRAWING ENTITLED"PROPERTY SURVEY" PREPARED FOR GRAPHIC SCALE THE MTM DESIGN GROUP, INC. ON JUNE 4, 2009, GRAPHIC SCALE (ANTENNA DETAILS a �P <M �N 9� PREPARED BY AREK SURVEYING COMPANY ass 90 0 10 50 eo ts0 �E 1 1 1s d2 sb =¢ m w 3. SITE MEASUREMENTS TAKEN BY APT ENGINEERING ON -� SCALE : u/4" =1'-0" ' n '' w 01/10/12 AND 01/18/12. A 'cyOq w0 F P" ( IN FEET) 1 IperyFEEfi )ft OFE5sko, P I Inch= 40 H (LTE A-BLK) ANTENNA DATA LrEc-BLS EXISTING ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS EXISTING PLATFORM WITH (9) MASTS o 0 SECTOR MODEL GTY ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL Q STATUS CABLE AZIMUTH DOWN TILT DOWN TILT SIZE Z ALPHA CELL: ADA-85408580CF 2 - 0° REPLACE (1)7/8' Z O 102' J PCS. ADA-85408580CF Y - 0° REPLACE (2) /a' 102' �` y ,� ' 0 J Ill LL o (POB/AWS) (CELL) � fi 'vim Z — BETA CELL ADA-85408580CF 2 - REPLACE (Y) ,/e' 222° PCs ADA-85408580CF 1 - REPLACE (2) /6" 222° (CELL) 10° 10, GAMMA CELL ADA-85408580CF 2 - REPLACE (1) W, 342° PCS ADA-85408580CF 1 - REPLACE (2) /e" 342" IX=102'� , v ✓ti Y x°' `� z w 0° / \ J � � TOMo . GPS N/A 2 - - REPLACE (2)Y2" N/A PROPOSED ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS _ (Pcs/Aws> �' U ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL NO. OF*CABLEE EXISTING too-5xSECTOR MODEL OTY AZIMUTH _ NOPOLE � ,DOWN TILT DOWNTILT CABLES _ PPROVEDd =2L„,ALPHA BXA-70090-4CF (CELLULAR) 1 - 0° 1ISTING 115°' Xff-1 I N G Ii'BXA-17Y080-8CF (PCS/AWS) 1 - 0° 1ISTING 115° (LTE A-BLFq . 108'-11"s AGZBXA-7oo90-4CF(LLu TE C-BLIQ 1 - 0° 1ISTINO 115° (LTE GBLIq - r_\ UwCOMBINED WITH 850 (LTE A_BLK)BETA BXA-70090-4CF (CELLULAR) 1 - e° 1ISTING 222° o K UBXA-171090-8CF (PCS/AWS) 1 8° 1ISTING 222° 'Y=34 jBXA-7o090-4CF(LTE C-BLK) 1 - 8° 1 ISTING 222° O o a F COMBINED WITH 850 (LTE A-BL4Q U c o GAMMA BXA-70090-4CF (CELLULAR) 1 - 3° 1 REUSE EXISTING 342' BXA-17109o-8CF (PCS/AWS) 1 - 3' 1 REUSE EXISTING 342° Z BXA-70090-4CF (LTE C-BLK) 1 - 3° 1 REUSE EXISTING 342° U COMBINED WITH 850 (LTE A-BLIO 1 (1)7a' UPS N/A 2 2 REUSE EXISTING rr (2) RFS FTLBR5002 TRIPLEXERS TO BE INSTALLED ON ANTENN PIPE MASTS AT EACH SECTOR, (2)TOTAL TRIPLEXERS PER SECTOR 2 Z CF2A1 : 4-LINES 3-ANTENNAS M4 (Pcs/Aws) r O a (LTE A-BLFQ F- 0) a o^ 700-850 700-850 PCS-AWS (LTE C-BL4Q pj a g XPOL XPOL XPOL :,\ J = -e J w / \ (CELL) Lu (a r � O (aO UP 2 }Z v O Z Q�Q N U fa Q W 11 v' Al A2 A3 $ • . ry x , (9) EXISTING LESSEE ALPHA, BETA, AND GAMMA SECTOR uj uj Z U .�� PANEL ANTENNAS rL 9 105-7"AGL TO BE REPLACED W/(9) a Z a 00 qllv ADA-834X838XOF-EDIN „° ,"°",".w"___" ADA-8,94X888XCF-EDIN '"' "� ir '1�Y NEW PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO EXISTING MASTS Zi O f0 w 11 aYz^ �` E$ P F—I'P wl 1, aLl'70dOi ..n rv" - — P FSTP !. 'IBA4T I 'JC "5 d8 " LL L) w n Ix x xi ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL a Q 0 _ _ a 0 SCALE' %Z'= 1 0 o o PCS-AWS z \ tJ �J pA Wlk aJ,A , p .... o. Im n,�ent ar pP, ew�, y ne'u n r Oo � � $ IQ + + F rnew Y n21 , t - - fill ADA 85408580CF wenl e + t - o o DIPLEXER DIPLEXER UwW ° t0ve "'° n ae,a n (TYP 6PL WGT = 126# u u m u U Inn l bae wnl nln h n �� 13 PF+ h nnn asL ranv w«r ' .. N'„I In rcwrnn r - n .......... a' U U V nmw ..y v elrv' T m1h 4,^an vrvl h\, la. .. _ - ... d + 0) ..,I ,Yp., .,,r.,Ys r n ,o y "o 1 Nntinuo, wr no-_ " C C (D Q O rv.N,..... •J ann)nka Ams p p L YVAYAIIIAO " we n Inmv, m F ^1m` °� \y Niq.Yn q,t;,i' — -1 =ok 5tiv IL MM1 AAmntl., onl Neg � � �I Q pm t'. , see as rlr Aa " 'ry x ,nry r I Lm..vl n , nv«' U U Q ADA 63406380CF (TYP 3PL) WGT = 17# DIPLEXER DIPLEXER DIPLEXER DIPLEXERUJ Z EXISTING EXISTING 7AC813 7ACBB 7AC8BPA 7ACSBPA G N w (1) PROPOSED sYa' PROPOSED a 0 ¢ v 0 0 I sYa' hYo' ' I . • •00 III SECTOR ALPHA BETA GAMMA BASE COLOR WHITE BLUE GREEN <,ia[a - ,-- c BXA-171090-8CF-EDIN-X `,""' ,x. 850 GRAY GRIAY GRAY BXA.-70090.4GF-EDIN-X o m " m m ".'.-'":,'r4', LTE-C RED REm RED X-IN I -Ernwnel 9U' X-PIA I fFfPanP NO' 1Fitl6i LTE-A. ORANGE ORIANGE ORANGE F mNv,N x, PCS PURPLE PUFRPLE PURPLE Z y vaL ' r"' 3 IIII AWS YELLOW YELLLOW YELLOW m a,a v,mr BXA 171090-5CF - I GPS BROWN j U �—- gg (fYP 3PL) WGT — 11# mna, ,Muw,r -� F 'll I W a 3 two k x ip 0 ,4 0 W t m RR .. .. _ _ _ m:t ,d m I .� - I.!I� FUTURE E-Z O ~ m F- A Aa rrrrr c z; F ... °m, ly. .cxr: a (� I� FUTURE m x O rmm Ixndat tan e"" - e �. �.� + 'I _ SPLIT Z w O `-' 6>/rll IPI R 'I� PCS-AWS IJ,J G z x � Ilu"Nna , ar -_ a LTE-7A 850 LTE-7C PCs Z Z .," ml .� x I, DI P�IXER Z O 5 I° FRAME FRAME FRAME FRAME d W 7 x LL c fh 1 m v n v \ynam\m,v rvw, Im.no " III Fj '1r vIYwu cau.l',dvy.www,a�ltiu_lk„awc6y J.,.w,+a,h.I„ l e a a,,n.l.ry H f N ALPHA BETA, GAMMA ANTENNAS M �IO aIN s Q BX -4CF (TYP 5PL) WO 2 COAX GABLE DIAGRAM °4P1io y SCALE : NTS SIDE BY SIDE " m0 aaeo'm FE5510`VT1