The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-121.-6-1 (3) EXISTINb SCREENING 45 400.00' 14 7.00' / REVISIONS: EVERAPMEN SITE DATA DECEMBER 21, 2005 JANUARY 20, , 2006 N 02 15 10" w TREES ~ V-C) V-, R; JR: ~Qv T/ 45.-I SCTM # 1000-121-06-01 PARKING CALCULATIONS MARCH 3, 2006 2 DECEMBER 27, 2013 PROPERTY: 35 COX NECK ROAD EXIST. STORAGE BUILDING: 9906sf/1000 9.9 spaces JANUARY 21, 2014 ADRESS MATTITUCK, NY 11952 EXIST. OFFICE SPACE: 320 sf/100 3.2 spaces MARCH 6, 2014 N DUMPSTER 46\ LOXATION" k OWNER: PREMIUM WINE GROUP, LLC EXIST. PRODUCTION: 6,992 sf1500 13.98 spaces 0 FT SIDE YARD SETBACK LINE 4 A ZONING: LB EXIST. TASTING ROOM: 738 sV150 4.92 spaces SITE: 155,204.28 SQ. FT. = 3.563 ACRES EXIST. TOTAL REQUIRED 32 spaces BUILDING: EXISTING: 20,585 SF PROPOSED PRODUCTION AREA: 3794 sf/500 7.59 spaces AREA PROPOSED:5,061 SF PROPOSED OFFICE AREA: 1267 sf/100 12.67 spaces T/045.5 XISTINIS EXISTI TRIMS / / / i ~ 110.6 o'g LOT EXISTING: 13% PROPOSED MEZZ. OFFICE: 678 sf/100 6.78 spaces I COVERAGE PROPOSED: 16.5% PROPOSED MECH. STORAGE: 481 sf/1000 .48 spaces Y T ES ALLOWABLE: 20% PROPOSED TOTAL REQUIRED: 28 spaces •..bP~.• . I EXISTIN& / LANDSCAPED EXISTING: 56% AREA PROPOSED: 52,64% TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 60 spaces = 0 REQUIRED: 35% TOTAL EXISTING PARKING 49 spaces S~. oj SURVEYOR: PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C. TOTAL NEW PARKING 28 spaces 0!C 1230 TRAVELER STREET (LAND BANKED) LLI LAWN SOUTHOLD NY 11971 - i D 5TIN6 1•~, LICENSE # 49618 Z DATED MAY 15, 2001 SANITARY CALCULATIONS Z 1. 1. ALLOWABLE DENSITY O T/ .5 NEW RAIN WATER DRAINAGE 5Y5TEM TOTAL ACERAGE: 3.563 ACRES HYDROGEOLOGICAL ZONE: ZONE IV FOR NEW ADDITION ONLY WATER SUPPLY: PUBLIC WATER Q I (2) 4 FT VIA NEW DISTRIBUTION CHAMBER (DC) ALLOWABLE: 3.563 Acres x 600 GPD. = 2,137.8 GPD a. (I) IO FT DIA x 9 FT HT RELOCATED DRYWELL • TOTAL SITE SEWAGE DESIGN FLOW: 1,125 GPD (DWRI.C) / a Z E:XISTI II. SANITARY DESIGN SEWAGE DESIGN FLOW: 06 EXISTING WINERY (SYSTEM #1): - -cm / 1. TASTING ROOM (5 GPD/OCCUPANT) -a h' ca 5 GPO X 20 OCCUPANTS =100 GPD (t7 FT VIA x & FT HT NEW DRYWELL (DNU(NENU 45~~ . p DY4 2. INDUSTRIAL (0.04 GPD/SF) r . EXI5TIN6 516N WITH IN RLr' . \ 0.04 GPD X 17,720 SF = 708.8 GPD O (2) EXISTING UP - 5v - / EXISTING SEWAGE FLOW = 808.8 GPD LI6tf75 / ' DW i ~ . ~ . EXI5TIN6~ , ryp W '1. ' PROPOSED ADDITION TO EXISTING WINERY t a FLAGPOLE - - ' ' DW 1. INDUSTRIAL (0.04 GPD/SF) v-F 155' NEW r-- /s 0.04 GPD X 6,220 SF = 248.8 GPD > ADDITIONAL SEWAGE FLOW = 248.8 GPD 0 ~y\ • , TOTAL SITE SEWAGE FLOW =1,057.6 GPD Z NOTE: OFFICE AREA IS LESS THAN 15% OF THE TOTAL AREA I.IJ MIN ~ • ~ • ' • ~ ~ SANITARY SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS b, NEW WASTE WATER 5Y5TEM~ o Y SEPTIC SYSTEM -1,058 GPD (I) 1,200 bAL SETTLEMENT TANK MIN ; 0 FL`` 1.SEPTIC TANK (ST): 1,058 GPD x 2 DAYS FLOW = 2,116 GAL (STL) (8 FT DIA x 5 FT HT) ' EXP ` `,LP USE MINIMUM: 2,500 GAL SEPTIC TANK (existing) 2.LEACHING POOLS (1-1 3): 1,058 / 1.5 S.F./GPD = 706 S.F. (U 8 FT VIA x 12 FT HT LEAGHINb POOL (LP) b S'I f ii USE MINIMUM (2 -10 FT. DIA. X 12 FT. HT.) = 754 S.F. a 44 >0 1 ,l' (iS ^ PLUS 50% EXPANSION (EXP): 1 -10 FT DIA x 12 FT HT / - _ ST (~{N~EW GLEAN OUT i 0, j T/ +44.1 FADE OF SUILDIN6 4-P_ WASTE WATER PROCESSING NEW PRODUCTION AREA N WASH DOWN at BOTTLING LINE 285 GPD O TOTAL PROCESSING 285 GPD WASTE WATER PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS: 5 I EXISTING SEPTIC 5Y5TEM EXISTINbAC°' S WASTE WATER SYSTEM - 285 'GPD 1) 1 (1) 2,500 OAL SEPTIC TANK (5T) (EXISTING) W CONDENSER HITH NEW EVERGREEN 'C : ' \ l~ 1.SETTLEMENT TANK: 285 GPD x 2 DAYS FLOW = 570 GAL (2) 10 FT. VIA. X 12 FT. HT. LEACHING LANTlt 1 - 1,200 GAL SETTLEMENT TANK (STL) (8 FT DIA x 5 FT HT) POOL (LP) (EXISTINS) SHRUB Pba5 _ • • • i • • ' 44 21EACHING POOLS 285 GPD / 1.5 SF / GPD =190 SF o0 Z (I) 10 FT VIA x 12 FT HT EXPANSION POOL RELOCATED DRYYeLL 0 p • ' - - USE 8 FT DIA x 12 FT F T POOL (LP) = 300 SF (EXP) (1) 10 FT DIA't FT HT 0 1•~ • , 1g IV, RAIN WATER RUNOFF DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS: J T/ 44.8 ' • S o EXI TIN& NEW ROOF AREA OF WINERY to J. TEES DRY WELL AREA x RAINFALL x RUNOFF FACTOR Q } ~ g1' a. • . to z~ { 8,811' SF x (2/12 FT.) x 1.0 =1410 CU FT W USE: (3) NEW 10'-0" DIAMETER x 3'-8" HIGH SOLID DOME u j. Q ' ZO„ USE: (2) NEW 10'-0" DIAMETER x 6' HIGH POOLS Q H • 9 USE: (1) RELOCATED 10'-0" DIAMETER x 7' HIGH POOL 7- 5+ USE (2) 4 FT DIA DISTRIBUTION CHAMBER (DC) N N [NO (3) 10'-0" X 3'-8" SOLID DOME = 326.1 CU. FT. (2) 10'-0" X V-0" STORM DRAIN RING= 684.2 CU FT F4 EXI5TIN6 TREES (1) 10'-0" X 7'-0" STORM DRAIN RING = 479 CU FT / NOV S +442 1489.3 CU. FT. PROVIDED REQUIRED ~E OF Ng ~p(0~ . , F1 i i w 1489.3 CU. FT. 1410 CU. FT. P EXIS N6 ov~ SPL. S 0 TR ~ ga Z BY MARK McDONALD • , I TEST HOLE GEOSCIENCE T/0+445 - P ` 5r'- SOUTHOLD, 0»95 -A NO SCALE i •a1N' • N~ ~ ~ t IG~ TEST HOLE DATA NEW YORK 11971 S~FR ~~GS R ' EXISTING TREES 1 ' 01 JE \ ~CVS~ YY' ~'G 15l~ 4.0 FT. LOAM OL ' 1313 DRAWN BY: SAND AND GRAVEL § NS TO MEDIUM SAND SW t CHECKED BY: \ LAN9J T 'MS 1 NS \ I AWN COMMENTS: NO WATER ENCOUNTERED DATE: SEPTEMBER 29, 2005 of SCALE: „ _ 9~eikd°u°~ ent Health Services LOCATION MAP ' : ~ ~ ~ ~ , suC'eltCowityl a EX TINS Approval for coast Irovsl for Construction-Other Than Single Family S \ \ I TREES 0 Reference No-CID- x No Se~D-r ~gn Fly SHEET TITLE: pirv • \ +44.4 1- Use(s) / ~p ~am~r; me~ beed reviewed for general conformance vii sufRoik SITE PLAN kpartment of Health Services standsrds relating to water I \ • / N V supply and mwage di and sewage disposal. Regardless of any omissions, \ amrdiet with or lack of miss or lack of detail, construction is required to be in acecrdaoce with the au ask" spedft oe with the attacked permit conditions and applicable s, w1w ePecificeny waived the Deportmeat. Twe approval years fism the approval or resswed. D Id Sound I e L = 12'7.60' O esphm S years firm the i ::2)1 -1-D I I ti A 1 T 1"o r% 1 A\ 1 . 1 i n.rA Da Ave SHEET NO.: T/G+4+49 `°J~V SITE SCALE: 1" = 20'-O1' I FLOOR DRAINS IN BUILDING T/F EL 45.0 BUILDING WALL GRADE LINE ELEVATION + 45.5 FT. o FF EL 45.0 I' MIN. 21 MAX. 03: w Z 1¦L Z TOP OF POOL O I/4"/FT. .41.5 FT. SETTLE LEAH I NO o W ,WMO POOL Z p a 1E. +45.1 TANK IE IF. +41.25 +41.I~T z IE. +41.75 \50T OF POOL Z O 21~5 1=T. Q GV ~ 6'1S' 8 Pt. O Z LLJ WASTE WATER PROFILE FOR WINERY V tY W NO SCALE a a Da Z. W J• = Z z a 7RAffl6 TRW LOMN6 CAST IRON MAFE AND COPIM TO 61A ~W• FINISHED GRAIM / L u. TRAMV, BEAMM g Q F-• uSd TOP BLAB 2w 0 INLff lNN. 4• DU MMInTCHMP MN. US'A' PROVIDE d TRAFFIC BEARING ~P~E OF NEwy0 5LA55 GA5T IRON COVERS STF~`9p~ J_ • 2' F 3 =h y .ti ~o• • of ~~3, X1795 A INLET 1 -~k R D R BA WILL MATERIAL OUTLET EC O: TO am GRAVEL sAND' MN 4' Dv. y 1313 V OIA R~ a FLOWZ; DRAWN BY. YD1A IWA LINE i y MOND w'A'r UT a CHECKED BY: 9 ; NS DATE: MIL ABOVE MARCH 6, 2014 } 6ROUN7WAT@t i SCALE: 1" = 20.-0 BACKRI.L MATERIAL TO ATONAL TO De 6' MIN. PENETRATION SHEET TITLE: CLEAN SAND. MD 6RAVS 0. AND GRAVO. IN %IMWIN 53RATA µo• OF GAND AND GRAVEL TYPICAL LEACHING Pt ING POOL DETAIL SETTLEMENT TANK - 1200 GALLON DETAILS N.T.S. WASTE WATER SY \TER SYSTEM N.T.S. WASTE WATER SYSTEM SUFFOLK COUNTY MARTMENT.OF HEALTH SERVICES "PROVED SHEET NO.: CONDITIONS # J, OF ~ FOR L LDIIAWU'rj NITIALS: SP2 REVISIONS: 4b EXI5TIN6 SCREENINS N 02 13" 10" W / EVERGREEN TREES SITE DATA JANUARY 20, 2006;.; 45 400.00' l 2 SCTM# 1000-121-06-01 PARKI PARKING CALCULATIONS pp T/ +45.1--'r . O` PROPERTY: 35 COX NECK ROAD EXIST. ST / EXISTING-. ADRESS MATTITUCK,NY 11952 EXIST. OF EXIST. STORAGE BUILDING: 9906sf/1000 9.9 spaces n v ~~"1 I EXIST. OFFICE SPACE: 320 sf/100 3.2 spaces 1LJI EXIST. PRODUCTION: 6,992 sf/500 13.98 spaces MAR 2 d 2006 46\ o OLl GAT ON OWNER: PREMIUM WINE GROUP, LLC EXIST. PP ZONING: LB EXIST. TA EXIST. TASTING ROOM: 738 sf/150 4.92 spaces L 40 FT SIDE YARD SETBACK LINE / EXIST. TOTAL REQUIRED 32 spaces 9outhoid town / SITE: 155,204.28 SQ. FT. = 3.563 ACRES (h BUILDING: EXISTING: 20,565 SF PROPOSE PROPOSED PRODUCTION AREA: 4216sf/500 8.43 spaces PROPOSED OFFICE AREA: 2803 sf/100 28.03 spaces AREA PROPOSED:5,384 SF PROPOSE TIC. 45.5 X15TING EX15TI TRE€5 TREES / i LOT EXISTING: 13% PROPOSE PROPOSED MEZZ. STORAGE 827 sf/1000 .82spaces COVERAGE PROPOSED: 16.7% PROPOSE PROPOSED MECH. STORAGE: 530 sf/1000 .53 spaces Y \ EXISTING h / ALLOWABLE: 20% PI PROPOSED TOTAL REQUIRED: 37.81 spaces TREES / LANDSCAPED EXISTING: 56% i \y Nb AREA PROPOSED: 52.640/6 T TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 70 spaces = 0 i REQUIRED: 350/• T TOTAL EXISTING PARKING 49 spaces O SURVEYOR: PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C. T TOTAL NEW PARKING 21 spaces 1230 TRAVELER STREET a G . SOU OUTHOLD NY 11971 .\Q LICENSE#49618 (LAND BANKED) W LAWN , N w z / LP ;EXISTING ph I. 1. ALLOWABL If/ •~-1 2 DATED MAY 15, 2001 SANITARY 1 VITARY CALCULATIONS Z I. ALLOWABLE DENSITY O T/ 45.5 u/ o.~ yI TOTAL ACI TOTAL ACERAGE: 3.563 ACRES HYDROGEI HYDROGEOLOGICAL ZONE: ZONE IV NEW RAIN WATER DRAINAGE .'IA ~A WATER SU WATER SUPPLY: PUBLIC WATER Q Lu 5Y5TEM RELOCATED ALLOWABI ALLOWABLE: 3.563 Acres x 600 GPD. = 2,137.8 GPD TOTAL SITE SEWAGE DESIGN FLOW: 1,125 GPD G (2) 4 FT VIA NEW D15TRIBUTION CHAMBER (DG) Iq LEAGHINS p TOTAL SITE SANITARY DESIGN Q Z (1) 10 F/T, VIA x FT HT RELOCATED LEACHING Q POOL EXISTIN II. SANITARY! 5 SEWAGE DI SEWAGE DESIGN FLOW: 06 POOL ,LP) EXISTING WINERY (SYSTEM ff1): (2) 10 FT VIA x b FT HT NEW LEACHING G" EXISTING 1 1. TASTIQ 1. TASTING ROOM (5 GPD/OCCUPANT) co RON POOL (LP) - 51 C~ 2.INDUST 5 GPD X 20 OCCUPANTS = 100 GPD Z 45 2. INDUSTRIAL (0.04 GPD/SF) O \ EXI5TIN6 516N WITH -yDG t~ 0.0 0.04 GPD X 17,720 SF = 708.8 GPD \ (2) EXI5TIN6 UP , LIGHTS , LP ~p\G• p . ' . EXISTING EXISTING SEWAGE FLOW = 808.8 GPD EXISTIN6~,~~ A'% _ / ."1. PROPOSE[ NDUST PROPOSED ADDITION TO EXISTING WINERY pJ FLAGPOLE 153' ' - /i 0.0 1. INDUSTRIAL (0.04 GPD/SF) Q LP r-- 0.04 GPD X 7,904 SF = 316.2 GPD > - DG ADDITION/ ADDITIONAL SEWAGE FLOW = 316.2 GPD O NEW WASTE WATER 5Y5TEM CP TOTAL SIT TOTAL SITE SEWAGE FLOW =1,125 GPD Z i / yk-p$1 uN \G X NOTE: OFF NOTE: OFFICE AREA IS LESS THAN 15% OF THE TOTAL AREA ui (1) 1,200 GAL SETTLEMENT TANK LP TI-p,- -"1 (5TL) (8 FT VIA x 5 FT HT) \ p SANITARY SY: 1ANITARY SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS (1) 8 FT VIA x 8 FT HT LEACHING _ ~~\5~ SEPTIC SYS' SEPTIC SYSTEM -1,125 GPD POOL POOL ,LP) 1.SEPTIC T. 1.SEPTIC TANK (ST): 1,125 GPD x 2 DAYS FLOW = 2,250 GAL F USE MINA USE MINIMUM: 2,500 GAL SEPTIC TANK (existing) EXISTING 5EPTIG SYSTEM EXP; $ 2.LEACHINI 2.LEACHING POOLS (LP): 1,12511.5 S.F./GPD = 750 S.F. Q (1) 2,500 GAL SEPTIC, TANK (ST) (EXI5TIN6) b tt USE MINII USE MINIMUM (2 - 10 FT. DIA. X 12 FT. HT.) = 754 S.F. PLUS 500% PLUS 50% EXPANSION (EXP): 1 -10 FT DIA x 12 FT HT p (2) 10 FT. VIA.-X-l2 FT. HT. LEACHING - SST`,'` + LU T/ +44.1 POoL'~LI-) (EXI IN6) WASTE WATER \STE WATER PROCESSING (1)rt0 FT VIA x 12 FT WT EXPAN51ON POOL ' NEW PRODUC• EW PRODUCTION AREA Z (EXP) WASH DOV WASH DOWN OF TANKS 285 GPD 1 p / NE EXI5TIN6 AG \ CORDENSER, - TOTAL PROCESSING 285 GPD \ N4~ ' . O TOTAL E~\ WASTE WATER LSTE WATER PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS: H B P AN S ( IF . ; _ 5p,\N _ ~j\/•~j~) WASTE WATEI I.SETTLEMEP TASTE WATER SYSTEM - 285 GPD .CHIN6CP LEV O b LSETTLEMENT TANK: 285 GPD x 2 DAYS FLOW = 570 GAL (U 10 FT DIA T FT H 1 - 1,200 G 1 - 1,200 GAL SETTLEMENT TANK (STL) (8 FT DIA x 5 FT HT) 44 2.LEACHING F LLEACHING POOLS 285 GPD 11.5 SF / GPD =190 SF 06 Z ~x\•,1\Nb • ' ' 1' \'1M1 , ' - - USE 8 FT C USE 8 FT DIA x 8 FT HT POOL (LP) = 200 SF y Q• IV. RAIN WATER RI JN WATER RUNOFF DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS: J M. w T/ +44.8 ; sJ EXI5TIN6 NEW ROi ' rc ' 8 NEW ROOF AREA OF WINERY W -j. Vo- ' TREES DRY WE DRY WELL AREA x RAINFALL x RUNOFF FACTOR 8,811 SF x (2112 FT.) x 1.0 = 1410 CU FT W fG USE; USE: (3) NEW 10'-0" DIAMETER x 3'-8" HIGH SOLID DOME W " GpNG'. • / 20 USE: USE: (2) NEW 10'-0" DIAMETER x 6' HIGH POOLS Q F- • 8 t\91 N~~' iP1 *r n2 USE: 1 USE: (1) RELOCATED 10'-0" DIAMETER x 7' HIGH POOL 5+ USE USE (2) 4 FT DIA DISTRIBUTION CHAMBER (DC) TIM P~~.~ ~G, \ • (3) 10' (3)10'-0" X 3'-8" SOLID DOME = 326.1 CU. Fr. (2) 10'-D" X 5'-0" STORM DRAIN RING = 684.2 CU FT \ o pt e EXISTING TREES (1)19'. (1) 10'-0" X 7'0- STORM DRAIN RING = 479 CU FT 1489.3 CU. FT. V\ t I PROM PROVIDED REQUIRED tE OF NfN F\71 ~6J 1489.3 1489.3 CU. FT. > 1410 CU. FF, y~~ . ST F AV EXISTING~~/ \ \ TREES ) \ MARK I\A f\ ~N W\` +na.i TEST HOLE GEOSCIENC CIENC BY DONALD ~y 1 9531 E SOUTHOLD, Rf0 R~ NO SCALE NEW YORK 11971 " T/ +44.5 \ E~bPad' 'C TEST HOLE DATA EXI5TIN& TREES \ ypp.PjN ' N~ NP' P I `I\GE \G'E TE. ROJEC O 5 ~G X\9T 4 1GCR p 4.0 FT. LOAM 7NS DRAWN BY: \ I LAWN SAND AND GRAVEL g RIC TO MEDIUM SAND t CHECKED BY: vol Eris 6 'yg?0 Z\~ i~ 17 FT. AWN DATE: SEPTEMBER 29, 2005 Z, Vmmmm,mmom.PURSUAWTOSOUMOLDTOWNCOiDESBC N y SCALE: letas«a ACIUIMMES THAT nol CONUmONS OF WEI SIE nM 1 0 I EX STING mph =CI. TeU.fsSec-oN-Om"q$lltRESOLVIWIO LOCATION MAP ' =20'-0" SHEET TITLE: s ~ TREES ,/1 O ~v FAMI'N SIB ~F +44.4F rq.l SITE PLAN T/ 44.2 ~ Av T' IN , S06'I40M}LAK14N BOP1iU _CurvdLLRS~u:~tMtr an=' OU ATS Sl~.inTUi~l _ 1N6B o Id Sound Pie = 127.60' / GO NOTE: The approved site developmem plan; "I be valid fat OV(~a Ave SHEET NO.: `0 !a SITE Code 9eCt10U 100-253. , T/c+44s SITE PLAN a period of three (3) yeah from the dale ofaplprwal aapllr, SCALE: V= 20'-0" a o„ a~ 0 sp PLANNING I SCHDS ~ II II II II II EXISTING BARREL RO M II a I I I I I I LOADING AREA REA I II II II w II II II I I II II II 0 11 II II HT)"HUBT) )11( „ LOADING BOTTLING LINE AREA )l c I 11 )o OTT) UT) II II II DOCK RAMP) a~ w U 11 II '1111XV )U II ) D~ IDU Hu )U~u H (HD C 3 CaB O W PAST. T103M DRAM U Z z TAWS "OAL) O p (D O W NM 7RMW4 DRAM 00000000 °a y0Z NEW PRODUCTION ? 1GTION AREA C00000000 NEW BOTTLING LINE AREA O GIST. TRENCH DRAM 1- §1 o a ~ Q _ Q STOR. ure aF o~zzAnirB ABOVE ANI18 ABOVE - Q NEW CONFERENCE OFFICE 00000000 z W EXISTING OUTDOOR FERMENTATION AREA b TOILET 1 b ~ Y 0 F- STOP, 1 ZZZ W N ~ z HALL I ~ 00000000 r H ENTRY uP ja- STOR. 1A I Eaer. TRE+cH oRArt+ a~ LOBBY 1 TANKS ("ICIAu 1 OFFICE )0000000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---I1]~ az ROOM NEA OO OO O TOILET OFFICE 11 11 O II 00 11 0 ~ II O II I II II ~ II III J~. soy 11 II II II I I EXIi'I m, COVERED GR THING AREA W 8 ~ II I WJC~~~ II II II II II l~ EXIST. OFFICE AREA z F ~ ~ II II I I I I I ~ I I I I IN W. SCALE _ III TN" "IC II II II FTT II a L El III ~ srl~lrRio~ I I I 0 EXIST. oil, I II F-* Oaf III III OFFICE III y~'tiE N STOR. II F-ATING FER 'INCG FERMENTATIOAl ROOM I I I L J I I I III * N "ET II II II II I I I I I 017953.1 X W II II I TA5TIN6 ROOM U u Ju T, C,~, I ~I I I I I I I P OJ CT 0508 I I I II III DNAwN BY: NS II II III I I I I I I II CHECKED BY: NS II _J DATE: II II II II I I ml ~ _ -m I SEPTEMBER 29.2005 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - J SCALE'I/8-• = 11 _ 0-. SHEET TITLE: FIRST FLOOR PLAN SHEET NO: PARTIA :TIAL FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 118"= l'-0" 1 PLANNING / SCHDS u II II II II I I LOADING AR OADINS AREA XI5TING R00 OW EXISTING BARREL RAM RAM II II II ~I II II II II II II ~I I I I I LOADING OADIN5 DOCK II II II DOCK ~I II II II aY D0 EXIT G EXIT CORRIDOR DN Ow MECHANICAL z z ~ C STORAGE o CD ° W a od 0z 5TORAGE h TORAGE MEZZANINE z W gbOF E O 0 EXISTING OUTDOOR FERMENTATION AREA MULTI- PURP05E OFFICE AREA a ~ o z - PRODUCT PRODUCTION AREA w BELO BELOW EMPLOYEE W" KITCHEN DH LOCKER 5HOY~R a~ M MA II II II - -5 Z. II II II I I I I I I (I II II II II I I III I I III J~• s~ W & :A II I 7W. II II II I I EXISTNG COVERED CRUSHI6 AREA III ~W.~~S II ~I II II II I I I I I I ~ ' II II II II ii ii ii x~ III IWy. TGw'tcK EXISTING ROOF EELOIN I I I I I I .N ALE II II T~ i t II II II ~MICAL F III EXI ING L T I EXITING FERMENTATION RCfM II IRO M III II II II II II III F--l II III ST II II II II II II L1fi J II III 4 iL OUF " a F~ ~ II II II II II II II II III I 0179 .1 41 II II II II III II II II II II Ir-~ II II PROJE O: 0508 II II II II II Ijl j II II II II III DRAWN BY: NS II II II II II II CHECKED BY: NS II II II III _ I I I II II II II II m DATE: - - -mJ SEPTEMBER 29 2005 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BCALrzl/8.. a 1. _ 0.. SHEET TITLE: SECOND FLOOR PLAN PARTIAL S IkL SECOND FLOOR PLAN SHEET NO: SCALE:: 7/8" = V.0" 2 PLANNING / SCHDS. EXISTINS STRUCTURE NEW ADDITION EXISTING STRUCTURE c GROSS GABLE WITH SHED DORMER EXISTINS NO NO ROOF PENETRATIONS (MECHANICAL, EXISTING CUPOLA NEW WINDOWS Pl )OMPLUMBING VENTS) ON THIS ELEVATION HEIGHT OF NEW CUPOLA TO MATCH ATGH STRUCTURE TO ® EXISTING 7TIN6 MATCH EXI5TIN6 EXISTING WINDOW5 EXISTING hil To W I N W N WINDOWS A II TI M4 G )'I5fll6 M G I a~ PTPA~ EXIS(STIN6 ~0 O W ® WFF Z ~ ® Z o ~ 51 I E F A H I T I FN 77- ° W X1 N61 H441 a ® 0 DOE IS IN N0Z IF= Ez-.1 nm, 5 DIN EMEM NEW DOOR NEW Wlh §1 o NEW WINDOWS NEW ENTRY NEW SIDING TO REMOVE EXISTING DOORS MATCH EXI5TINCP EXISTING DOOR WINDOWS NEW 10" SQUARE PROVIDE NEW a ~ COLUMNS TYPICAL SC o SOUTH ELEVATION EXISTING WINDOWS WINDOWS z SCALE SCALE: 118" =1' -0" m W" EXISTING STRUCTURE EXISTING STRUCTURE t OR055 (SABLE, PROVIDE ROOF EXISTING H EXISTINS PENE PENETRATIONS (MECHANICAL, PLUMBING CUPOLA CL 4 CUPOLA V VENTS) ON THIS ELEVATION ONLY HEIGHT OF NEW STRUCTURE TO MATCH EXISTING EXISTINS WINDOWS EXISTINS OVERHEAD STRUCTURE COVERINS 0RU5HINS AREA v0 Z. I, i T II I 0 EXI'TIN 51 IN6 N Q• J [sod W J • ¢ „ cio ~ LLI 'C u j- u P Q F• u $ ILLU 77 IN N• EX STIN E ISTI G 51 IN6 XIS IN6 (DIN 5181 142 -4 F-1 NEW SIDING TO EXISTING RAILING `~1E W NgK EXISTING ST OVERHEAD MATCH EXISTING DOOR NO NORTH ELEVATION PREMIUM WINE GROUP ~C 017953-1 SCALE: SCALE: 1/8"= V-0" CONSTRUCTION TYPE: STEEL FRAME (NON-COMBUSTIBLE) 5TIBLE) Eqf Aa PROP05ED USES: BUSINESS (OFFICE) INDUSTRIAL (WINERY FERMENTATION) ATION) PROJE O: 0508 AC6E550RY 5TORAGE (CASE STORAGE STORAGE / MECHANICAL) HEATIN(5/COOLING: GAS FORCED AIR HEATING AND COOLIE JD COOLING SYSTEM, DRAWN BY: NS ROOF TOP UNITS WILL NOT BE USED USED CHECKED BY: SIDING: MATCH EXISTING: "HARDIPANEL"-51ERR '-L"-51ERRA W-FIBER NS CEMENT, VERTICAL SIDING PANELS WITH ELS WITH SIMULATED WOOD DATE: TEXTURE WITH BATTENS, PAINTED :D SEPTEMBER 29,2005 SCALE: ((BENJAMIN MOORE-HO-112, REVERE PEWT ERE PEWTER) TO MATCH EXISTING 118" = 1. - 0" TRIM: (MATCH EXISTING: "HARDI TRIM" - FIBER " - FIBER CEMENT SHEETTITLE: SMOOTH TRIM AT ALL WINDOW AND DOO AND DOOR CASINGS, SOUTH CORNER BOARDS, FRIEZE BOARDS, ETC,. R05, ETC. PAINTED MENJAMIN MOORE -CHINA WHITE) TO M.4 TE) TO MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION ROOFING: IMATCH EXISTING: STANDING SEAM META AM METAL ROOF, COLOR MATCH EXISTING (EMERALD GREE ALP GREEN) WINDOWS: ANDERSEN" CASEMENT WINDOW5 OR FU W5 OR FIXED (WHITE) MAIN DOORS: MATCH EXISTING: MAIN ENTRY DOORS, DOORS: CUSTOM WOOD DOOR5 COLOR: MATCH EXISTING (DARK GREEN 2K GREEN) SHEET NO: EXIT DOORS: IMATCH EXISTING: METAL - PAINTED TO I NTED TO MATCH TRIM UTILITY DOORS: 'MATCH EXISTING: METAL - PAINTED FAC INTER FACTORY FINISH WHITE 3 PLANNING / SCHDS EXISTING CUPOLA EXISTING CHIMNEY EXISTING OVERHEAD ® ® BEYOND STRUCTURE COVERING a~ CRUSHING AREA 0 I FI I N O w EXISTING Z ~y z O COVERED ENTRY 112 11 11 11 11 11 o W IWO °a X 5T 5 ~XIS-IN5 run 7 y0Z E I TI G EXISTING ® SIGN GATE z SIDI IN I IN 1110 a 0 0 EXI5TIN6 a ~ EXI5TING EXI5TIN6 VENT EXISTING EX EXISTING EXI5TIN6 EXISTING EXI5TIN6 ELECTRIC ENTRY DOOR TRELLIS WIC WINDOWS VENT METER FENCE DOORS STRUCTURES o z EAST E 7STAELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" =1' -0" W" OC a~ EXI5TIN6--,, TINS CUPOLA IOLA aG Z. NQ• a Jam' 'fie I W J @g°aZ W. ~y a f LLI 5 S 11 11 31111 N U) - A I N 6 E 5IDIIN q~~tE -0S Mx EXI5TING EXI5 EXISTING EXISTING VENT ` VENT EXISTING VENT DOOR aTgsa- RO C 0508 DRAWN BY: UT WEST E ,ST ELEVATION SCALE: 118" = T -O" CHECKED BY: NS DATE: SEPTEMBER 29 2005 SCALE: 1/8.. a 7~ On SHEET TITLE: EAST & WEST ELEVATION SHEET NO: 4 PLANNING / SCHDS MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~pF SOUjy P.O. Box 1179 MARTIN H. SIDOR ~0~ Ol0 Southold, NY 11971 Chair u OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS y ~V Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. . TOWNSEND yCOW Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 12, 2009 Russel Hearn 35 Cox Neck Road Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Site plan for Premium Wine Group SCTM# 1000-121-6.1 Zoning District LB Dear Mr. Hearn I'm writing as a follow up to the telephone conversation we had on May 1, 2009 regarding issues you are interested in resolving at your site. As I had mentioned to you, the issues of on and off site truck circulation were to be discussed with the Planning Board at the May 4, 2009 work session. As a result, the Planning Board is very interested in resolving the issues as well and would like to give you the opportunity to propose any suggestions you may have to improve the situation. Please provide a sketch plan and/or written description of your proposal for the Planning Board's consideration. Once you submit your proposal, I will schedule you for a work session at our earliest convenience. You may contact me anytime with any questions you may have. Thank you. Sincerely, Kristy Winser Senior Planner Cc: Planning Board Scott Russell, Town Supervisor WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, May 4, 2009 4:00 p.m. Applications: - - - Project name j Premium Wine Group SCTM#:11000-121-6-1 Location: n/s/o of County Road 48 at the n/w intersection of CR 48 and Cox Neck Road, known as 35 Cox Neck Road, in Mattituck_ Description: This amended site plan includes a new building of 5,384 sq. ft. added to the existing two buildings of 20,585 sq. ft. on a 3.563-acre parcel in the LB Zone. Status: Conditional Final approval dated April 11, 2006. All work shall be completed within 3 Action: Review site plan with regard to deliverv traffic to the site. j Attachments: Resolution dated April 11, 2006. - - _ _Pro qct name: Beds and Borders SCTM#: 00-127-2-2.1 - - - Location: 550 NYS Rt. 25, Laurel Description:_ Proposed farm stand application - - Status Bwlding Department has requested comments. ; - - ..Action Review site plan and DOT letter - - Attachments ; DOT letter and Draft Comments Subdivisions Project name: Fischer, D_8 N SCTM#_ 11000-15-8-1.1 _ Location: 38785 Main Road, Orient - - - Description: Proposed standard subdivision of a 72,665'sq. ft. lot into two lots, where Lot 1 is 36,333 sq. ft. and Lot 2 is 36,332 sq. ft. in the R-40 Zoning District k Status ZBA hearing scheduled for June - - - Action Provide comments to ZBA Attachments Draft C - _ omments _ Project name 1 Edward Latham ;SCTM# 1.1000 19 1 7 5 Location f 31900 Main-Road, Orient I Description: Conservation Subdivision of a 10-acre parcel into 2 lots where Lot 1 is 7.04 acres and Lot 2 is 2.95 acres - - - - -Status ' Open - Action Review application 1 - - - - , Attachments Timeline/Staff Report UI~o ISO SCOTT A. RUSSELL Town Hall, 53095 Route 25 rC SUPERVISOR H P.O. Box 1179 ~ur ~Q Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax (631) 765-1823 Telephone (631) 765-1889 OFFICE OF THE SUPERVISOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 13, 2009 APR 21 2009 y Raymond and Carol Wiwczar P.O. Box 186 Mattituck, NY 11952 Dear Mr. and Ms. Wiwczar: Thank you for your recent letter regarding the problems you are experiencing with delivery traffic at 'Premium Wine Group. I have referred your concerns to the Planning Board and the Code Enforcement Officer for their information and review. I am confident that a satisfactory solution to this matter can be reached: Sincerely yours, Scott Supervisor /rbw Heather Lanza, Planning Director Damon Rallis, Code Enforcement 1 Y Supervisors Office (Scott A. Russell) Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold 11971 March 24, 2009 Town Board: My husband and I reside at 440 Cox Neck Road Mattituck. Our home is directly across from Premium Wine Group (Winery) located at 35 Cox Neck Road. This winery has frequent intervals when they are trucking in grapes from local wine growers in making of wine and then shipping the product out to varied places for delivery. Large amounts of supplies are brought in and also large quantities of the product are brought out. The trucks used to provide these services are usually large tractor trailer trucks. Because of the layout of their property the large trucks are forced to stop in the middle of the road slightly past the winery and start backing up in order to fit into the proper place for loading. In the process of backing up, (and holding up traffic,) they on more than one occasion have backed onto our front lawn and damaged the grass with their heavy trucks and large tires. We have tried to be understanding and have complained to them several times, resulting in their making some kind of temporary amends. In the last 5 years this business has obtained at least 2 building permits for their property and yet the issue of large trucks entering and leaving the property has not been properly addressed. Shouldn't they be able to conduct all their business right on their own property without a hardship to the residents, or the neighborhood? There is apparently no provision for turning large trucks around and the business of loading and unloading without using the road and our front lawn. Aren't zoning laws and ordinances designed to protect the homeowner as well as local businesses? We believe the problem can easily be solved by redesigning the current curb cut'and parking lot. We look forward to your suggestions. Your attention in this matter would be most helpful. It is quite upsetting for us to see our front lawn torn up unnecessarily. We have spent a lot of time trying to keep it looking nice. Thank you for your attention concerning this matter. Respectfully, Raymond and Carol Wiwczar - 440 Cox neck Road P.O Bx 186 Mattituck NY 11952 MAR 2 5 2009 rs .cam-. ,-rim _ - - ..?s:`~r-`~"'~'~=' ~ ;.r,~ -~'s"r.'~ICu ' ~~=g'.r<• `r~', y# - y,,.~-- - ;.r _ T", ! Ftz?...; J" 3v,r .x ''-`'L71~•. _ :.e,a. a }.o•" a~~~' r. I ..u S #A: gr;.' -py~.•~'i~. ,r. ~,;4 +v 'Y i.c. ~tf „r-: :+~.F`Sfj` ic. xf riy mot: tr,., A y .t -•ia'i"'` #'zy ) k ,~y M ` M•Tai. .^J;F ~.t.^kry g~ r, r,.3r~.. s# r.a,~ ! 1 qa' yr. - w:'.r4 r~`"._*v q.<,h~e° .'"1', - 'fi",.~ynq'. •s",• art`.-..?--- t- ?i ~~,u~wt -r,» - ~ "'',~"t #r z .yams. Y,' ':F. >4 ~--s t`••sr'- tS~ r''e, 'SV. ~~!-,e•,...:. r?'.. "~'s "ta :`_'ds'~++"~-n.N r :57=;~ ~ :a;,rda .:'7y~'~ ~ ,r .s.y' r~"~!•Y r' M o-~.- '°3 r4"+! :Ly z ' y ~4` d , - - a,. _ ;Ck_. , ' ~Ay 4 ' 4^ t ~f, s 4~ .".r-• ax , r.,'4 ~C -~`ki-. . t ~ _tl;. a'xcx 4. "~r"'~ a :t'i' 4x .~r--' •:Y:! r~, ,ur'` ~f~_-~- c ;e~i{ ,e•t a y~' -C 1; 3k9~i'W . a - aA - : .~j Y,'+:, „y '17~ ~ :...!~r niS! ..`r°C' n s r r - ~~'e> ~ r,*.~~'s K` 3 ,F. it ,F.'w. o' `i, a . ti a „3: q= „`~!'k+-ae'~'~'l"..' a. ~•a,, r,! ;~g~ ~r~,~~ n'~'::;a -S'ae A s"`~'x',t,. b J.4.: ~ x-: y,~P'" - ; ~!n.• !•~:7 , ~ a^y,.,.. y3y-.•~`.+ +5,^~-. y},t, 'Yp`a" g~' ? s•.;d.-.C~ A.,.. _ `„t~. >a''!P4 ~~ta • - ~ - rw~" ~~r• y. y• w _K': 3+ r+''. Yt a'F Ly r: rte, q, e,~wC t M.r w•ip a, F,:y~«ef jr F{ k w. "am~ 4, ~ ~ ~ "5 '?:r _ f`r ..~.:-~-'c x,~'L' rt•'~;' ' A .t"s ;r: ii.r3R'i-s.~~a- v- ~ ~%t vw - z„t~: y- -ta i .FV: r ....i _.g,. '^w'+{, ~ .~f '~+}r~~~a r?y~r:- 'e'~.' p ,a : Crkt:'~t•. `Wit. 6`~ r~r..E.s ..mss. nt~`.sx.~' J r~' x - . _ ; . ur;7 ~a~ 3+.R, t E r ~+.r.,_ s,. ' ~,,~Y~~ N ~ .-t;•~s.,.y v '.:x x + ' t - ,~ayc.,r' w L`~ r v~v• .r,*r edv6. .ts -,4.. : r ~'i"n ".a. <,~'q.~.f. ~+at~ :i~~ ~ `A i ,r~,~ H x a:. ~ -~£"~yy "+3~'.~°~"•b - ~r~ r t 5~', k. a - ~fi~t. ~C.j _ s~ r - 'r.,q 4 `F"' _Lr r ,:,d`Rs„3c^~'k •i''''"" ~y,4' '1 ' V.+ 7+~.~ --v ..F' +.,yr x. s., .~,i°, - * .rR. ~ r ~ ^k' x ~x~SJy~• .a ~ ~ r. 5 ar a -9t a,.e•. r `4 :rr. ~y_ ~ r ~'.n! ' r + ~~R'' ~^~x~ _ '7- .E#''~ "4; b-r- s< tb`a` f'i ~ F'"':_; ,i > _ ?r•,w~,rT aJW-i•.,e'' r.'•r r.•'`5 .r ,4 '-f roe ~~'ik ''r„t-~'.,g h _•~'`ar_ " •ty_ _ F.- ~ Vi=n., q~:a` `C+-,.A,tiy'^ - ,:,~~+•i.. n~.a A._. s. - . ;s '^t y .~",":.y 're's a - :-.r' r •ti' r sT14",. ~ -~~r - 4 ! - < i~•,'~ ~ ~ e r ~t i v ~~i. € 3s<,.''. .'tn' i k _w, i. 7". 's• - - a.., „,~irt•-,.~9 mow: ~~~a, ~4~d,,'$--:::~.-.s.'~ep.~ta"'A~~~-..: 17',s~+'~ fir'' S ~ ~ k ~'~Vs.' -ac~9~ t~ 9 ~ 1 t 3>c~ ~ { ~ • +Y.+, ,t a. ~t ~ 'j'~"`-L' s'..~ .;G':, w~~} a ~.~::1~,"Q F - a9'"r SM } '.'~`v ti,r 1 _•~S- 4..-' f h Te * ,pk 'ai _ . R. ~•`•"6}h ,K ~-r 'I _ p its ''±a Pala 1L. 1-'PP a~•cti , t.-~t~ ay _..y y. "p"!' M -T,~, - - ,r-~`yt+rts" .x.,.~.e;"~--'' ~ t* tc.,~ "`,r .i6"L'~~~- yE~ 'y~Axe~R',~'a ~ m ~ ~r ~ r s- 'p ~ r 3 ?..mac ~ ' 3 d~"-•:~ rt.PJ.:s` fl+ r.. - p :'v t",:~ 'n-' F - ~:7` . . w _ ` r it ~„~.a. 3 * ' - ~ , *.ae e - ~ .,rsr - Jr'.•~ ry D - ~'r ` ; :t~`.a "k. ld. ,~"n' w-,•rs ~ :d b ~y~ -S-F;;d"3'a = •c"' rr ~ fC r 5: s'- `aka. ~ v-. ~`''t's:...x~. _ .y_ . ,t. ~a•'-.t i s Y 3a,~~".r.. _ .~.aB ; ,v .~.K .t. '.i '"e s - ti- _ ;T.. srr r'."~'':• :=.sar, "S.Ty.. „•`~"r -v.,r~~ - Fr' -~f y ~y'iG~r-: s ~ ''Y='n .F~; l 'r .a5. v ^~4! as a..,, „t ±r ~:'xat X r~ ^.sw.;''~, x ~ z ~ ~ ; r ,-t.+ r• ~~eva "ur u d y~.£'". ..,`t;"£~~ s'+-` .,,v ~tAr ~ ' r • rat- ~ ~9~ ~"'x`•,ra,~ - r r , 3•di,_~°+r"'~ -`,-9*'",t8'- w:"p .~.Y 1° r - a"', J,,,~ i ~e Y . 'x' '3.t?• .^ur•.- k"~ OF.y: x. ,r•aGr :r, : `u :1~ ~ w t^~i~ Y y" ,,f ":,ra°`~3'•_~. ~.x y '_ti` c '.wk ~"s°~;+~,lryt,~;'~,i^-~:.f•1~.~r.•cg~ t,._ ~s'.~ z--1 - - F * - ,">t -",Y,f, A`'°w 3~.Y. ° r '?-:fx- a~`..' .,aw~ _ ~ w•F .-r-. "s"' ~ , E'+h+..a. 'r may, uac. `cA - ..dtaeP rv fi }'°'v. _-J,re r s'{ ^c`. w ew a .x F' _ _,C r ,,,~'i_w`. 77, Y 'r R't rsx "fi,-~3,n;;F- „-'".a ~3 :via" _',~•t~5 : q r =~6~~ ..tee„+i_ ;,o _ ,r.. -.w ~%*kw r~..t~ r k^'~ ,~^-~7c, ~t - ter x e { '~}~c.. - _ •-s_ _ - low r ~ `rrpeyµ„y r..",: ,i'"`„,''aftka``~aPy. Allr r-,.._~f' - nk - „,~~"`Y•`"'^'''"^,'y~-,wk.r~Kr<+v' zr:: :~.,f ::..^'cr,,,3.^ s v-t` r <3"k^'e" - -~s. - Aw, 'x , . - ~ ,per d A:.? x t &..,,;.•""*^v"~',°;. °"~-P"`'..c,,a '',~1. -~^1'~ •~,.w: ~..?is'~^err~,,,,,~~..'ay ~ 10 +s,•n, ''?°x,.n:s°ol'[", v~-'!Ym-~y 'vi y' y k'~r`° y,v~ ? .3..`` .r': _ ~<r_• v., -WEV ~ . ^A ~ • r..~.^s.-a:~'rx~, kt:' fi~+•s~ _ t ~ , - - : . c r ±rg c . A„ a rxy's r •fi.. .der '•.~"au, ad¢„ae~''Y?52""f r^...•y "e`x°W.r ,,;i;,~ ',`8• . - - _ ^~11A at t a~ ~ _ '~i;+x,.~ ~ ; 3.t'av< ~.s ~a~s y,. ' o L'•~xr '1' r ' z ~S"`.. _ ,x `+a? b, `b r~'=cas,a~~`9,~~,,,f~ ,~y t ; ,~'iv-,-t`~r `~~~%M k• "4K •s, aaF (5t.,,, ~ is r • w c - i:9 yptunum' se Vie, name 1 ~lp A a~,~ Y- 1 S 't akin y L 1 { r ~f ~t z `g r a r" r ~fs,~,r t bra 'YS 'n' r a{ r, . lPN F~ :kY rgy4 P-n y iTjF f } ep 'S t.. M #r a v v{ gwa J ~a yr _ S o- + nadir Ir ~sdw ¢ F~Tw1PS~s 4N firv,yy~Z"a5`:t 7- rzrk.Z'~y,... . r t ~ 4 ti~ Y `i r r t ] l L~4 r I v a w t r t a _ ir.~ A r I`: (ii s r t o 5'.' Yl A n'a'y. 7 / Y I T 1~, 1 4 1 ~l } ~ 0. 4 Y ~ v} R3 sr r P - ~ifi r ~ y, Af Pj''t~~~a :%l•'Y ~ r~r~'~z~-~ ~i I-_r~{~ 3,P2 r1 X1! t i Jby+i;kr Sbf ~eO't'~'4y~f v. .•r -O4. - w wn 'fix . 1 mi 4, s ti q y a Y >~.,3 I, spa s' N , ; t 1 t F is.._C xF ~ ~y!, r r 1 .(j n tt" y~ 4p - 4 A _ K -T ++K ti!~r a t r •tt~,s°:`}.- n~€ e v,.y t r J" t r t y' y e f~, r L g `~Ty,,Sr Tr }'fir i 'k ' I s" i eiT s,r ft^ zl 3 s" k r? J 1 r A~i'Y y7} rveT ~v ~'R{- ~t 1 .'bi, { t xsy ts'y -f~ tr- m~~„S #S'~p',i w ~h 3 ''f~b >7 .+1 4 a' Ya try! e; ,r^Y` •a ``S'~ A 9 FfY r A gir t S*Al~+ •i., c' ~k: z {,L~ ~ h~* I , i a ! ~ x.'}Lf'1., x "Y'~- ,r~ Ex- er~ 'H- Y ' 9r 4 : c - 3•. ~.mw rj j ~ ~frye,.r t i y~~ ~ < Jr'-~T ~ --s't~ i' ~4 ,r~{~ ~ ~ bA tr~,•# d3 s _vW 41 R,Y£y~ rr! r. i s ? y 'L A t~.I i { S S S c , ` r ~s t 'Ml. s3 ti s'rti'L f~. a f t '3 J,!'hq s ~r?a{s tia - :i ^I 9 r : '{..f?, ? '<<~. All. 4'a4 ty s r, s~, t r. +"^aK± 1~' K W 'k s Syr d;"' t'$ - ~ r k ,s • fi~z, e r se :f„F~'~ ~ •~a `t ~r a~ ~`'Y~ +imf _~?,rd ~..,.s_ 3s y - zJ ' Sr Y 31rr <i' .ap t tF k v. °a Sk 6 €~yr ~5 a } k ~ _ ''T ~f! / - w s• 4 '3 4- -tY (1~.r~~'4i',yi `+'8~i~'t' 6a Yam„ A 1 , 4 r y ~ ,^p'i eyf i r~ ~ 14! 6' ~ ~ ti ~ 4 ~ ~ ~v e ~ yry,~~~`rxrX'C z ' +,y'°~:~ ~ ^ ~ r • -fly-f j s _ „;ss;}~,~ +r 4 ~tc~ A ~ ~ f r . r ~ ~Yc, t. .~~ti;;.`L, e~' 4- T. ~T .0 ' x ~ yC•'... -yt r ('F ~v`~s4 J.>',. i I yIYTI_A a' _ <&r Fiv' S3$ ( } qtr " L ' r K j~g i' G Y :s Min" I 41, s } r k. d ° r• xtY. ant S4 „a f ~s y'~,ats u rarf ~r 7 t s* s as S 4 w ~ ra c n ~S rwkxy~~3C,~ }dttr1'~ `~zrTwq.! w s r~tf~s Y/ 1 4jaYxP `j id tQ ply"7> ~y{Y 4s~9 C'' ^ uJ ' 1 } r i F ~y Y}11 CV l f~ RWI h~ i 4t J~ h t xt 'r i x, 7 2 y4 a A tic ~ Y f 4F r~ i t laig A }vi g k .~.~~5'"?s~.~Wii.ak• 5,~ 5 (w ~ ~ u~`- ( ~ xt4.(` to it ~fvX3~ a%~ ,~ir~l4'~ ~~~c'L"= t~~ ~ ~ t~• f~~ -.~fi i f y ~ t~ '4 b , e'C''F FL~nir`~"- ~+,~~~'t"V~,7' S W Y`~N3~''z`rt''! L 4 ,rt4l .YS' r arc =:F y°5Catl,'v1 #.F " 1 5^ t ' 9 b s eg} Mks e# {s a t ' , • ~ y~~yy t Sir ~ 1 A 1 r i k ).Fr+. xi4u 7 ' S~ca~} >r +t~~ r< - y t s 3 X4('~,r A l' f 11 h S 'i ' ^J' Th +"t' r~ Jf 'rr 5 , f '1- g ~ r r ~1~ l;,;i, tl4b tlNl >i•~' R`-V ot. Qv,r1 tt '~/1v'~ i)i y5 _i 'p ,eH:3 iw''~cys3'"21JJ+I r +t,.~ ~S a 41 Ar 1 ( 4 " FIF x IF b d A •2 & SlT&*~'~try-'v i 't,•'//dfJ t )Yt 1 y. ~s ti y a i 4" +L.~''"M s ,+F Y S ~,i, G~ G A~ f ~•,~v+sd~ t ~ ~ 3 x 1 r 4 4 fi ~ ..A ? Fib..- Y - ~i 5+ El ~<p 53 ca .1 Y'R,# 1 ;{d ~~l+ t~ia;" t fit ~ p t y}~i~; r~+~51'iy ~ r~ ,y. .3'xr la r ~ s !~~'~~r. s,! ~(s~~~Kr~'~'+~ ~,~r~ ' y. ~7 I ft r Erg rq 5 ° 7 34 S~sd n+ e r t. =w~ s Y tl a a F t f h ~ n ;s . r„y, ~ r j 4~ ~ i, c F` F t y ~`.S'. /a ,gg~~ <k,..,~ ~ ~jz~ s H~ i° c + ~ i M.i'F •G t~' ~"a~~'~M. :r ads t ' ~i ~Je J -r6 n e t 4. r x k k , - ts,y k h y ,f; ~t 1 "f y 1 r af# <rzf~ $ I r aRi,i=: 5 P < a t w + .v ,w;^Y +n r % r; i eas,`°t -z 5' 1t s 5' .:3 :_+j ssf p~, }u i .5 tk ti y i~#.'e Y3.~ ra J ' r :I z` f 4S' qrrt.IFr' 2"'~ { r<, r 1 a ~s 1 s y.`d c t;,, •rYr: g p ~'W.r''u -ry :rttil~ NL b 1 w i 7 'f 'Y '7. .G . .f. 1j6 1 i L ~ J$ m 5s m 9'y W M`k3,~, S of ~1 t wf K 'r'p"~ 1 7 ? Ks~ d E k c ] a v:1 0 Y r t1' r 4o 3 a \ c 4v i'^ hJ'gaicg d`jr~ lt' ? f(?,4~a .YnrJZ, x' r l a A~S~ Jw53~~°~ a= s~ yP 'S ME, i. ~ ~sw i. < 35 I .I i' s' Efi x R a 4:r ~ ~9 n r Y , ~ x!~1 "~mr'Nr~gp t f rn rt ~ n , a y EC`~i y ~(~r ~l t +r'f, k *7 ti t;;' c r. ~;.P ~,#8 a ( 1 r i'4 ~ y E= A') s,-_ r` ~'•W s ° !i R ~~ft v,~ 5 ` f~~r L u f o ,afi.- ~',c,r t a 1 ? r d, bil S W att t }s~y c, r t off?E e , ti'z n 1L ~.t A"'r3`'k ~,'t. ac hl a„wyi .5`'.~i~tltl*{ rf ~i ; # 9 it m ft 3 s~tt r~tK~.f1 a. ~.'uy~. I'9t' r. 7 1 { ~Y Y. p " I ft .M V~' r~ y R i"47n,F~~\l°tpl'L Utz, ry 6, r S y y 'fit y .'fig 1: F_ Ya?'~,-?• '.1 r a - fi r y 4 t ~s ro ~ i ~ rYS ~ 3, t 1 t tax '~s, >'~'s~y. .f• ; ~f°r~'., l 4 hx~} 3 t5 c v A 5 +a`~ ' ~b4 j'~ X r'[ i~ Yy;4 bs- k Z s. a _ -a, r rx:;tJ.' r F,Q v"• ~Q'.Ps 4_. gam. e Fie 9 4 wf 3~ 1 k 4 4j ,.Y 7 t [ 3^ ,y~~ `.,J` ' y .g5 ~>g' , t ~ d, • r 's3AS~, ~ a4~ „'`~w~ 1 r~ ~1+ ' rs w ti 'R s ~ ' ft S4,r•; j{ 1. •#2 t~,5'.r.'f~"' y `r t 3~r ~r 1 "k` ~M fi 8 h~ fig r1 S ~ X`"~"SW R{. •st _ ~~I,~~£'' hr •E 9 Y > ~ ~`,~t~ rqi ~r ,~a.7s:r~ Jx ~i'_ e~. ~y~s~ i ~A'~'.5 s r'Lif '""F „i $ ~ ~r t~'~,~y:t~i~ ~i f.;'~~A M~s?~.r'~:q ~c~'.,. '~'•~'r ~9f {1 yvt i~L rs. 4~~y ~ w, y~ x ,~y dj t yt')'Y'<''3YS~':r4 F ' r r~ ty 3'.' , 3+~a~`` 4 ~,'>r~t ~ a ~ ~'a ' ~ k a F ref y'f w~'t~r n::, { ~ d#,' 8 ~ , G t''"~~ ry d'.`+~''S~•.'{' I y ,~+5 i 7f,x ~t tl ~~F~J!~•_w~ t c yf a~ .~71 v k k) t'`~ f r Y "5 t ! # t~rr ` ; #cy s x a. cTr s, R 5 s sA~~t r 5 -kt c"~+ i )-"isn'4~.y Y Y,~M13~fi, e 4 i~ m ~7 AS .1 7 MkIrk f~ 3 r l f.X xr'*i b gj 1 s ,cr Y y`~."s d 5.,,r'i 4 ~'frtltr~gLr`. s;,-'-,.'.`s4 'xyi ~",7'+ 1~.+,.1~8 },.y a sk `rt.iZ,k.~..Ylk' 4~OUNTY OF SUFFOLP 6'S •r (a i-1 STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE r DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING rr+a sA.ISLE P. DIRECT N G April 11, 2006 r~ ~n 1• Ms. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse 2006 Planning Board ; AFR I Town of Southold ti P.O. Box 1179~ Southold, NY 11971 Re: Premium a roup S.C.T.M. 1000-1 1 ^ Suffolk County Planning ommission File LS-G-2001 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: Your notification for SEQRA coordination for the above referenced action was received by our agency on March 23, 2006. The Suffolk County Planning Commission is an interested agency and hence has no objection to the Town of Southold assuming Lead Agency status for the above referenced action. The Suffolk County Planning Commission reserves the right to comment on this proposed action in the future and wants to be kept informed of all actions taken pursuant to SEQRA and to be provided with copies of all future EAFs, DEISs and FEISs. Please note that prior to final approval, this site plan should be referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission for review because the property is adjacent to County Road 48. We have no comments on the proposal at the present time. Sincerely, Peter K. Lambert Principal Planner cc: Andrew Freleng, Chief Planner M:\SEQRA\2006\Southold\Prennium Wine Group.doc LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H LEE DENNISON BLDG. - 4TH FLOOR . P. O. BOX 6100 . (631) 853-5190 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788-0099 fax (631) 853-4044 MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBER P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE V SUOTyolo Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS # Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR Q 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON p (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND ~yCOUSouthold, NY IY 1, Telephone: 631 765-1838 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: FROM: Nancy Steelman Amy Ford COMPANY: DATE: Samuels &Steelman 4/12/2006 FAX NUMBER: TOTAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 631.734.6407 3 RE: Premium Wine Group Nancy - As discussed, please find attached a copy of the Negative Declaration. Please call me at 631.765.1938 if you have anyother questions! Thanks, Amy. PLANNING BOARD MEMBEO • MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE hO-``~OF so~lyolo Southold, NY 11971 Chair V` OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR CA 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON ,O (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND OIy~~UNTI Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1935 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE April 11, 2006 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Ms. Nancy Steelman Samuels & Steelman Architects 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, New York 11935 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Premium Wine Group Located on the n/s/o of County Road 48 at the n/w intersection of CR 48 and Cox Neck Lane known as 35 Cox Neck Lane in Mattituck SCTM#1000-121-6-1 Zone: LB District Dear Ms. Steelman: The Southold Town Planning Board, at a meeting held on Monday, April 10, 2006, adopted the following resolutions: WHEREAS, the amended site plan is for the new building addition of 5,384 sq. ft. added to the existing two buildings 20,585 sq. ft. on a 3.563-acre parcel in the LB Zone located on the n/s/o of County Road 48 at the n/w intersection of CR 48 and Cox Neck Lane known as 35 Cox Neck Lane in Mattituck, SCTM 1000-121-6-1; and WHEREAS, Premium Wine Holdings LLC is the owner of the property located on the n/s/o of County Road 48 at the n/w intersection of CR 48 and Cox Neck Lane known as 35 Cox Neck Lane in Mattituck; and WHEREAS, on October 6, 2005, the agent, Nancy Steelman, submitted an amended formal site plan for approval; and WHEREAS, on November 10, 2005, the Mattituck Fire District responded no additional fire wells would be necessary; and WHEREAS, on November 25, 2005, the Suffolk County Department of Planning responded after review and determined this matter is for "local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact(s)" and the Planning Board accepts this pursuant to 239L & M General Municipal Law; and WHEREAS, on December 1, 2005, the Architectural Review Committee reviewed the architectural drawings and associated site plan materials and approved the application; and Premium Wine Group Page Two April 11, 2006 WHEREAS, on December 1, 2005, the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals granted a Variance described under Appeal Number 5784 allowing a 60 foot wide by 87 foot deep one-story addition connecting the 2 separate existing buildings; and WHEREAS, on December 23, 2005, the Suffolk County Department of Public Works responded after review and determined a permit would not be necessary; and WHEREAS, on February 6, 2006, the Southold Town Engineer reviewed the amended site plan materials and approved the proposed drainage with comments and the Planning Board incorporates his recommendations in this site plan; and WHEREAS, on March 6, 2006, the Southold Town Building Inspector reviewed and certified the amended site plan for "Winery" use; and WHEREAS, on March 13, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617.7, initiated the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this unlisted action; and WHEREAS, on March 22, 2006, the Suffolk County Water Authority responded with no objection to the Town of Southold Planning Board assuming Lead Agency for the above referenced project. The following water conservation measures were recommended by the SCWA: 1. Permitting the irrigation of only 15% of the area of any single lot. 2. Usage of low-flow toilets and plumbing. 3. Adopting methods to reduce the potential of degraded water from recharging to the aquifer. This could include limits on the amount of fertilizer dependent vegetation maintained on a lot. WHEREAS, on April 3, 2006, the Southold Town Engineer reviewed the amended site plan materials and approved the proposed drainage and the Planning Board incorporates his recommendations in this amended site plan; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, has received affidavits that the applicant has complied with the notification provisions; and WHEREAS, the following three (3) items shall be required: 1. All outdoor lighting shall be shielded so that the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light and glare within property boundaries. The lighting must meet town code requirements. 2. The applicant must obtain a SPDES General Permit (NYR-10Ho57) for Storm Water Discharges (General Permit Number GP-02-01) from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for the construction activities. 3. Existing sign lighting be removed and replaced with down lighting to eliminate any stray glare. Premium Wine Group Page Three April 11, 2006 WHEREAS, on April 7, 2006, the Planning Board has received any comments or objections to the proposed action; therefore, be it RESOLVED that, on April 10, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action. The Planning Board establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency, makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration; and be it further RESOLVED, that pursuant to Southold Town Code 100-254 Part 1, the applicant agrees to incorporate all the requirements, comments, and recommendations of each reviewing agency as referenced above and as indicated on the site plan and corresponding attachments; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board has reviewed the proposed action under the policies of the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program and has determined that the action is consistent provided that the best management practices outlined in the December 29, 2005 memo prepared by the LWRP Coordinator are implemented; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant approval on the amended site plan prepared by Nancy Steelman of Samuels & Steelman Architects dated September 29, 2005 and last revised March 3, 2006, and a set of architectural plans prepared and certified by Samuels & Steelman Architects dated September 29, 2005 and authorize the Chairperson to endorse the site plans with the following conditions: 1. The owner, agent and/or applicant shall receive approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for the approved construction and submit such approval to the Southold Town Planning Department for review. If such approval varies from this approved amended site plan, the Planning Board reserves the right to the review of a new and amended site plan application. 2. The site plan approval requires that all work proposed on the site plan shall be completed within three (3) years from the date of this resolution. 3. Prior to the request for the Certificate of Occupancy, the owner or authorized agent must request the said Building Inspector and the Planning Board to perform an on-site inspection to find the site improvements are in conformity with the approved amended site plan. 4. If the as-built site improvements vary from the approved amended site plan, the Planning Board reserves the right to request a certified as-built site plan detailing all the changes. 5. Any changes from the approved amended site plan shall require Planning Board approval, and any such changes without Planning Board approval will be subject to referral to the Town Attorney's Office for possible legal action. Premium Wine Group Page Four April 11, 2006 The Planning Board will issue a final site plan approval in the form of a letter following a site inspection and at the time the site improvements are found to be in conformance with the approved site plan. A copy of the approved amended site plan is enclosed for your records. As per the Town Code, one copy each will be distributed to the Building Department, Zoning Board of Appeals and Town Engineer/Highway Department. Enclosed is a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson Enc. cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Southold Town Solid Waste District Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Suffolk County Department of Public Works File MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS • P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE . r3f S0UrjyO Southold, NY 11971 Chair lQ OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR C ~ ,ac 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON a~O (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND COUNOV Nw Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant April 10, 2006 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 7 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed Amended Site Plan for Premium Wine Group SCTM#: SCTM # 1000-121-6-1 Zones: LB District Location: 35 Cox Neck Lane, Mattituck SEQR Status: Unlisted Conditioned Negative Declaration: No (X) Description of Action: This amended site plan is for the new building addition of 5,384 sq. ft. added to the existing two buildings 20,585 sq. ft. on a 3.563-acre parcel in the LB Zone located on the n/s/o of County Road 48 at the n/w intersection of CR 48 and Cox Neck Lane known as 35 Cox Neck Lane in Mattituck. SCTM 1000-121-6-1. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed. The determination was based upon the following: No major change in the use of either the quantity or type of energy will occur. No creation of a hazard to human health is expected to occur. The proposed action will not cause a substantial change in the use, or intensity of use, of land including agricultural, open space or recreational resources, or in its capacity to support existing uses. No substantial adverse change in existing air quality, ground or surface water quality or quantity, traffic or noise levels; no substantial increase in solid waste production, potential for erosion, flooding, leaching or drainage problems will occur as a result of this action. On March 22, 2006 the Suffolk County Water Authority responded with no objection to the Town of Southold Planning Board assuming Lead Agency for the above referenced project. The following water conservation measures were recommended by the SCWA: • • 1. Permitting the irrigation of only 15% of the area of any single lot. 2. Usage of low-flow toilets and plumbing. 3. Adopting methods to reduce the potential of degraded water from recharging to the aquifer. This could include limits on the amount of fertilizer dependent vegetation maintained on a lot. No significant removal or destruction of large quantities or destruction of large quantities of vegetation; no substantial interference with the movement or any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species; no significant impacts on a significant habitat area; no substantial adverse impacts on a threatened or endangered species of animal or plant, or the habitat of such a species; no other significant adverse impacts to natural resources will occur. The proposed action is not in material conflict with a community's current plans or goals as officially approved or adopted. The proposed action will not impair the character or quality of important historical, archaeological, architectural, or aesthetic resources of existing community or neighborhood character. Based upon such, no significant adverse impacts to the environment are expected to occur should the project be implemented as planned. There has not been any correspondence received from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals, Southold Town Building Department, Southold Town Board, Southold Town Board of Trustees, Southold Town Engineer, Southold Town Solid Waste District, Suffolk County Department of Health Services, NYSDEC - Stony Brook, Suffolk County Department of Planning or the Suffolk County Department of Public Works in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from these agencies. For Further Information: Contact Person: Amy Ford, Senior Planner Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (631) 765-1938 enc. Resolution cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Southold Town Solid Waste District Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Suffolk County Department of Public Works File 2 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING 2006 i pPH " This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property k ow as so 'f EM\Um WiN-E Gf-UuP ~i by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing one la I have sent notices, by certified mail - return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of eve property which abuts and every property which is across on ~OSSEL L N-Et)~IJ Your Name (print) 4~ Signature bb LOCOS NC-000 ) E-Ma [WC5 Ny h0140 Address q/6P/©4P Datt Notary Public gU~ PATRICIA RICHARDS Notary Public, State of New York No.OIR16042467 Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Expires May 30, 2062-0 PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY; noon, Fri., 4/7/06 Re: Proposed Amended Site Plan: Premium Wine Group SCTM#: 1000-121-6-1 Date of Hearing: Monday, April 10, 2006, 6:00 p.m. . ON DELIVERY ¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A rse . Item 4 N Restricted Delivery Is desired. ? Agent ¦ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. , Received by (Printed Name) C. Da a livery ¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front If space permits. D. Is deliveryaddress different from Item 17 ? YeYe 1. Article Addressed to: If YES, enter delivery address below: A No Tertarwa Giacomo Gwanc Bernal 4996 MIN Lane 3. Service Type MgUkXk, NY 11952 ]Zr Certified Mail ? Express Mall - ? Registered ? Return Receipt for Merchandise r ? Insured Mail ? C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (E)ft Fee) ? Yes 2. Article Number 7005 0390 0004 1186 4127 (nanarrr from service rb. J PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595.02-M-1540 SEN . E R: e ¦ Complete hems 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A. SI re Item 4 If Restricted Delivery Is desired. x ? AgW ¦ Print your name and address on the reverse x 11111 so that we can return the card t you. B. Fiscal by ( Printed Name) C / Attach this card to the beck of the mailpiece, 'fY0°11' or on the front if space permits. I ma,r, tA,- f to c 4 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from Rem 17 ? Y If YES, enter tlelNery address below: N. Carol Feinberg P.O. Box 186 440 Cox Neck Rd. 3. Sarvloe Type Mattituck, NY 11952 Ji(Certffled Mail ? Express Mall ? Registered ? Return Receipt for Merchandise ? Insured Mail ? C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ? Yes 2. Article Number (rrensrerfromservice fabep 7005 0390 0004 1186 4189 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 SENDER: COMPLETE Ie ON DELIVERY ¦ Complete hems 1, 2, and Also complete ?.elg ure 40 Item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ? ¦ Print your name and address on the reverse Address" so that we can return the card to you. ~aCelvC nted / ^ c. jor~ Ijsery • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, ' cel Or on the front if space permits. 11. ~,el l Y. 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is calvary address different from Rem 1? 0 Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: r"TTXIP~ Bruce Vitale 7280 Sound Ave. Mattituck, NY 11952 3. Service type j'CertMed Mail ? Express Mail 1 ? Registered ? Return Receipt for Merchandise i ? Insured Mall ? C.O.D. i 4. Restricted Delivery? Els, Fee) ? Yes L2.Article Number fer Iron, "Nice race 7 0 0 5 0 3 9 0 0 0 0 4 118 6 4141 3$11, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-0z-M-1540 SENDER: COMPLETE TH), SEC WN i t r, ,w, SECTION ON DELIVERY ¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete - A Lure Item 4 N Restricted Delivery is desired. ? Agent ¦ Print your name and address on the reverse Addressee so that we can return the card to you. YB.~elved by (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery ¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front If space permits. D. Is delivery address different from Item 1? ? Yes 1. Article Addressed to: If YES, enter delivery address below: ? No >r- t Jambs J. Bissett III J 323 Long Island Ave. HoltrAle, NY 11742 3. Service Type ! Certified Mail O Express Mall Registered ? Return Receipt for Merchandise ? Insured Mail ? C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes 2. Article Number 7005 0390 0004 1186 4134 (Hensler from service lab9q Ps Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 Postal Service,,., Postal - fu T CERTIFIED MAII-Tv RECEIPT M1 CERTIFIED . • S ri (Domestic r9 (Domestic Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) S 7 -0 §'"2v.- tea, p= 1 a cO I1~EI 1C N~ a MA[!#TU7, IM 6310,x:' _ ' Postage $ 0. r c7 Q n43~ Postage s 0.87 UN11 TD. 2935 / S S C3 Certified Fee n.l z~ C3 Certified Fee 2.40 C3 Postmark Postmark Return Recel Fee C3 Return Recelpt Fee 1.85 Here (EMoraement Required) 1.~5 Hare (Endorsement Required) C3 Reordered Delivery Fee Clerk: (961Yn Dom-' Restricted Delivery Fee C1el1k: KVGJYO 0' (Endorsement Required) M (Endorsement Required) C M C3 $ 5.11 0; /31.106 G $ 5.12 ''?.i.1 J1i L`6 Total Postage & Fees ToW Papegs & Fees L ruse Vitale iw kk aBema--------------------- ' - - or oun v . W er _Mill -L.aDa-------------------------"-------------"---------- G" ~f191iit{~Ck, NY 11952 ~k;~` 1495-------------------------------------------- llllyl :rr m Postal M1 , CERTIFIED MAILT. RECEIPT r9 (Domestic Only, No Insurance Coverage provided) r9 1-1 S S NlAT6VEJY4 A U ~ ~R C~7(.Ni[~JF~'YJY 293 L USE r Postage $ 0.8? ~1k3T-" 493 r Postage $ 0.87 (MiIT ID: 09j~ p Canllbd Fee T'O Certified Fee C3 2.40 C3 Return RecelPt Fee ` Postmark p~ Return Recelpt Fee .40 +POaenerk (EMOreemem Required) 1.85 Here (Endoreemem Required) 1.85 %})ere ~M Reshktedpalvery Fee Clerk. VG.TYO Q° Restrcre.-,N.,Fee Clerk:IVG.7Y0 M (Entlwaemenr Raqulred) n'I (Endorsement Regwred) C3 Tbul Pa•etg• & Fen $ 5.12 03 /31/06 C3 Total Postage & Feea $ 5.1 03/31/06 N Ln C3 C3 15 c3 ames . less C3 aul Pawlowski m;g7W-L-ong-lstand Ave M1 ~~c aPD wldal~PM gown Laiia-Cane•-----"---•--•---------------•-----.-- r-NY--1-47-4.2 ~gUe "Nip f1 I I U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL RECE. r C13 (Domestic Mail only; No insurance Coverage Provided) aaaw~ 7 A maTfi, rY Gal l A L U € 0.87 UNIT IU: 093` r9 stage i Po pNAed Fee 2.40 Postmark C3 Return Receipt Fas 1,85 Here (E"dmomem Required) Clerk: GPM C3 Restricted DelNery_Fee M (Endorsement Required) 5.12 03/31/06 Told Post•g• d Fe•• $ Ln p ° bo ,;Bo*-48& M1 orPo~1 - oXNeLk.Rd #a ck NY 11952 , Postal Ln CERTIFIED MAIL,,,, RECEIPT ni No Insurance Coverage Provided) rq (Domestid Mail only; S .T 4TI06fi,Y 8171 1 F m°S:i Postage $ 0.87 UNIT" IDI- 093S S Certified Fee o 40 S? ° Postmark C3 Return Receipt Fee Ike, 1.. 85 (Endorsement Required) C1@Yk:: KVG7Y0 ° Restricted Delivery Fee D^ (Endorsement Required) M 5.12 03/31/06 E3 ToW Poetege s Fees $ p ant 0 OU O ° -sr :Box 1179 r ar biy, PO a, NY-1-187a Postal Service,,., Z'53 CERTIFIED MAIL,. RECEIPT rq 1 (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance ~ Coverage Provided) '3 1 ~a M0A6A"'*Y11Q21 A, r9 Postage $ 0.87 UNIT 10: 0935 S Pj. C3 c•mnea Foe "40 C3 Postmark C3 Return Receipt Fee 1 85 Here (Endorsement Required) ° Restricted Delivery Fee Clerk: KVGJYO D' (Er doreement Required) M Total Postage B Fees $ 5.12 03/31/06 Y7 C3 ` e homas Foster r c - oPo Jackson iii', SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SE, )/V ¦ Complete Items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A Slgn Item 4 If Restricted Delivery Ia desired. ¦ Print your name and address on the reverse Agent so that we can return the card to you. 0 Addressee ¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, by ( AkTq Cs to of Delivery or on the front N apace its. _ S 1. Article Addressed to: ro . Is delivery dWmM from Item 17 0 Yea t S~ YES, enter delivery address below: 0No Paul Pawl0waid . 1766. CrOWn Land Lana' Cam; NY11`' s.rvkelype 0 Certified Mail O Express Mail - " _ 0 Rogstered O Return Receipt for Merchandise 0 Insured Mall 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Fft 2. Number Feel ? Yes Article (liansler hwn service Jebel) 7005 0390 0004 1186 4172 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return gsceipt 102595-02-M-1500 ; A- SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION 0 F11111 011 DELIVERY ¦ Complete hems 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A re Ram 4 if Restrcted Delivery is desired. 13 ¦ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. 'Addressee ¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpieoe, S. Recelv by( P nted Name) C. 9` ry jqf or on the front if space permits. O 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item.17 ? Y>- IF YES, enter delivery add below: .0 No Thomas Foster Lisa Jackson P,O. Box 476 3. Service Type Mattituck, NY 11952 IdCertlned Mail o Express Mail 0 Registered 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise 0 Insured Mail 0 C.O.D. 4. ReaWCted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ? Yea 2. Article Number (Thansfer from service label) 7005 0390 0004 1186 4158 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Dornsetk Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1500 SENDER: COMPLETE ¦ Complete Items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A Slgnetti Item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ? Agent ¦ Prim your name and address on the reverse x so that we can return the card to you. B. Received ¦ Attach this card to the back of the maiipiece, by (Printed Name e ry or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to D. Is ddlVery address different M YES, enter delivery add ow: ~PTON ,1r ~ / Town of Southold ~~!s s P.O. Box 1179 ` Southold, NY 11971 3. Service Type jleCertffW Mall 0 Express Mail l r 0 Registered 0 Retum Receipt for Merchandise 11 Insured Mall 0 O.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Exfre Fee) 0 Yes 2. Ankle fir.... (°ansre se X005 0390 0004 11L6.65 PS Form 3811, February 2004 ~~Domestlc Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 sr ~gUFFO(,rc i~ SCOTT A. RUSSELL JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. rA .r SUPERVISOR ENGINEER TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD TOWN OF OTHOLDYORK 11971 4W Fu. (631)-765-9015 y~Ol 41 Tel. (631) - 765 - 1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse April 3, 2006 Chairperson - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Premium Wine Group - Amended Site Plan Cox Neck Road, Mattituck, New York SCTM 1000-121-06-01 AFP1 - 3 2005 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: As per a request from your office, I have reviewed.the amended site plan for the a) ove referenced facility. This site plan has a revision date of 3-3-06ahd"was piepd7ed'tiy the'offce of Samuels & Steelman, Architects. Drainage Calculations have been provided and the existing drainage structures located under the proposed new building construction have been relocated. The new drainage calculations meet the minimum requirements of Town Code and additional leaching pools have been provided as necessary. This site plan, as modified, has addressed the concerns listed in my December 1, 2005 review in a satisfactory manner. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact my office. Sin rely, ames A.cc: Peter Harris, Superintendent of Hi ways MAILING PLANNING BOARD MEMBEA • P.O. Box 1179 ADDRESS: JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE OF SOSouthold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR H 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON ~O (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND COU'M Southold, NY IY1, Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE MEMORANDUM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: James Richter, Town Engineer From Amy Ford, Senior Planner Date: Match 31, 2006 Re: Premium Wine Group 2595 Peconic Lane, Peconic SCIMM # 1000-74-5-4.1 In reference to the above, attached you will find a revised site plan last revised March 3, 2006 by Samuels & Steelman Architects. Please review for comments, concerns and certification. Site plan enclosed is for your review and records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Cc: File 1 site plan prepared by Samuels &Steelman Architects dated September 29, 2005 and last revised March 3, 2006. Message • Page 1 of I Randolph, Linda From: Jean Burgon gburgon@timesreview.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 9:53 AM To: Randolph, Linda Subject: RE: Legal Ad for 3/30 edition Got itl -jb -----Original Message----- From: Randolph, Linda [mailto:Linda.Randolph@town.southold.ny.us] Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 9:29 AM To: jburgon@timesreview.com Subject: Legal Ad for 3/30 edition Please send confirmation of receipt for the attached legal ad for Planning Board 4/10/06 Public Hearing re Premium Wine Group. Thanks, Linda Randolph 3/28/06 MAILING ADDRESS: PI.ANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE so Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR Cn GEORGE D. SOLOMON el* 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND ;NN (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) coulm, Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on the 10th day of April, 2006 on the question of the following: 6:00 p.m. Amended site plan for Premium Wine Group located on the n/s/o of County Road 48 at the n/w intersection of CR 48 and Cox Neck Lane known as 35 Cox Neck Road in Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-121-6-1. Dated: 3/28/06 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson PLEASE PRINT ONCE ON THURSDAY, MARCH 30,2006 AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE. THANK YOU. COPY SENT TO: The Suffolk Times #7813 STATE OF NEW YORK) ) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Jean Burgon of Mattituck, in said county, being duly sworn, says that he/she is Principal clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a weekly newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for __I _weeks, successively, commencing on the 30th day of March 2006 ri cipal Clerk Sworn to before me this n 0 day of. 2006 N L NOTICE Omit Pursuant to I' m a 4s To" Law and A §o tMld of ihlblic h of V the Town of f ho; 8 RUblid hoer ing will be held,by oltl'the $ouflt Town CHRISTINA VOLINSKI PlannmgBoa ,u tLe"CotveIWILMain Road, Southold, w York on the 11Mh NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORI( i- dayollApr0,2111"thequestiodofthe NO. 01-V06105050 1 following: 6,00 p.m ,Aojended. site plan for QUtlilf Lud in Suffolk County Premium Wme :Group located `on'the COMMI8slOn Expires February 28, 2008 n/s/o of County Road 48 at tho nfw intersection of CR 48 and Cox '-Neck . Lane known as 35 Cos Neck Road in Mattimck, Town of .$60hAt, County.. of Suffolk, State of IN a; r -lI ffolk I County 1kx Map hifl~a-j§ t4 32'1 6-1. Dated: 3/28106 ' BY ORDER OFTIIE SOLTQOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Jerilyn B: Woodhouse Chairperson 781117' 3/30 • • STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) LINDA RANDOLPH, Secretary to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, New York, being duly sworn, says that on the 28th day of March, 2006, she affixed a notice of which the annexed printed notice is a true copy, in a proper and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, to wit: Town Clerk's Bulletin Board, Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York. 04/10/06 Regular Meeting: 6:00 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed amended site plan of Premium Wine Group - SCTM # 1000-121-6-1 Linda Randolph Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board Swoorn to before me this --day of aCwCL , 2006. Notary Public MELANIE DOROSKI NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New York NorOID04634870 Qualified in Suffolk County.~~~,//~ JJ Commission Expires September 30,a vv b PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS• . MAILING ADDRESS: JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE QF so P.O. Box 11 ~0~~ ryOl Southold, NY 11971 Chair O OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS * Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON G Q JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) I~CUUNIN Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on the 10th day of April, 2006 on the question of the following: 6:00 p.m. Amended site plan for Premium Wine Group located on the n/s/o of County Road 48 at the n/w intersection of CR 48 and Cox Neck Lane known as 35 Cox Neck Road in Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-121-6-1. Dated: 3/28/06 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson SAMUELS & STEELMAN A=HITECTS ~~44C OCR 4G3LQm(mo44LA 25235 Main Road CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 ~b (631) 734-6405 Fax (631) 734-6407 DATE JOB ND. ATTENTION (V~~ o t[! RE: .i MAR 2 B; soul lo,_ Bonn WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ? Under separate cover via Plan _ > ? Shop drawings ? Prints ~C Plans . Sam lei _ej6i ~s ;R ? Copy of letter ? Change order ? COPIES DATE NO. m A^ r DESCRIPTION W? LJ THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ? For approval ? Approved as submitted ? Resubmit copies for approval ? For your use ? Approved as noted ? Submit copies for distribution As requested ? Returned for corrections ? Return corrected prints ? For review and comment ? ? FORBIDS DUE ? PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS, W~ Jf- LPM/J i S i yybs cS ~ ~ (D,~ ~ J'I L(n 1 COPY TO SIGNED: ~)9/K __1 a If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. • • 5ut-O! ,q Y SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY Timothy J. Hopkins Administrative Offices: 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, NY 11769-0901 General Counsel (631) 563-0236 Fax (631) 563-0370 March 22, 2006 MAR 2 4 2006 Ms. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Planning Board Office Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: SEQRA - Premium Wine Group, Mattituck, SCTM# 1000-121-6-1 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: Your notification for SEQR Coordination was received and reviewed by our agency. Please be advised that our agency, the Suffolk County Water Authority, has no objection to the Town of Southold's Planning Board assuming Lead Agency status for the project captioned above. In the SCWA review ofthis project as submitted, our agency found no appreciable impacts on groundwater quality that would affect our operations. However in keeping with the SC WA's mission ofprotecting and conserving the Town ofSouthold's water supply and to reiterate the findings ofthe environmental review for the SCWA's Water Supply Plan, the SCWA encourages the proposed project to incorporate the following conditions: 1. Permitting the irrigation of only 15% of the area of any single lot. 2. Requiring the use of low flow plumbing fixtures in accordance with the latest codes. 3. Adopting methods to reduce the potential of degraded water from recharging to the aquifer. This could include limits on the amount of fertilizer dependent vegetation maintained on a lot. Page Two March 22, 2006 In addition, consistent with its Findings Statement, SCWA encourages the Town to impose appropriate conditions on the project to reduce the potential impact this project will have on the water resources ofthe Town of Southold. These conditions could be memorialized in the form of Covenants and Restrictions on the project that are recorded with the Suffolk County Clerk. In the future, kindly forward all SEQRA coordination applications, EAF's, DEIS's and FEIS's to my attention at 4060 Sunrise Hwy, Oakdale, NY 11769. Thank you. Very truly yours, Nv- J berly Kennedy Assistant to General Counsel IIIlllll P~a4 q, I~Ir~ d 11005 S'9 8.26-9 II 29 -96 a PE - xei eoo 6'1-9 N SEE SEC. W. 113 $ CONO LAND ]NbT k' Q lvQ' ~ IOOt9 ~ 14Tg1 ~ u-I]-w IurcH iai TX \D\ C,F 4B 12-15-9 - y'z SAa y m. N0. © 1 FOR P0.. N0. 2-2 -x+-o 1e09 uD-prrova9 's, ]aa -11 Voolr lam auz°s W F 06-01-0 10 5100 fad at-01 0! \ Z 09 0 01 FOR M. w- OS-0O.p E SEC. NO L] SE . _ \ O 2.2.1 A e 0621.0 120-OS-001 1.10 ~.EIdXM11„ L9AIC1 11 OF 01 N'1 • I,h &(A ^ OF + V j 'VI 09 06 0 V` W l So 1) 150'1 1.9 a IJA(a s I+ AVE. , SJ1 O / /2 A ,j J 5.OA C 4.3 n ]0 A z.oa AN C L2 ro9X OF UTXOLX TORN W EWTXOLA - Mttirouxxl GMTS~ UA PENNC CARD TRUST 1.10 90 e SAIC J 5.9 5.6A 1JAIC1 ° 1. A,5 SIFPOLX 59.0 2 yet Xr4 / ' / / g, COUNTY [0.MTT Of SIKiOLX ,.CA - / WATER G\ / AUTHORITY SdW 9d 2aA I 51 [ O )~0 rs \ P 9aA (.ID 51 ICI - vm1 5.3 )P ~ O 9 s`&.° T~T.\ 5QH0., a i - 5 - 1{ 1 SC 5C 4 ) w 4 s~ s TA ..>.m. ~~~..ao..~~ 9.5 00 ll.]A F 93A J, ,E ?J M1 tY OF ) 6 COIAI w ) i, O SUFMx 9 FOR . ME SEC. SEE YC 122-02-025 025 , Eq ° O sAP N ' II 5.] i r ) s v ) m~..ma. ]O.BAICI ' qP's 2~ w 19 _ 'p.• ? 9 i%H OF 50.1r 4-TA 14.3 _ .11r, .mv iJA w 1e - 7 y. is 20 SLAFFOCK COUNTY CC01rY % y.1EEq.X I' a ° - EATER R AUTHORITY 25 j : - ' . Lse 'YIIJ 21 14.1 N - 9.2A \ 7.3 0 29.2AIC1 p 22 w F \'s y 2.4A 23 N 25 O o° j 9csx sr.a Tarr OF SOUTHOLD IN TH01 / s. 5 FW PCL N1 SEE SEC W. X M-01-001 1.006 - LAUREL LACE SORE PCL NO. . , 5: . r. - 01-014 all, SE SEC: AN. 125 TIRE MATCH ME SEC. W.125 SEE SEC.W.125 LINE " °T.Al' 9,;„ F5 gTAS N011cE C-),--- COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © N I,1 %X 6 SOUiHOLO SECTION N-ALL uAINTENANC ELTERATIaN SALE aR Real Property Tax Service Agency r GSTMOTM OE E 1 PO TON aE IXE Fl~ ,x, 122 AnSlOll .a, u. AP s 1A.. LO COWty Center IliverheXA,N Y 11901 M 1 2 1 •ILLWT Irl". PEPUIS50N Or F.F "IIE A, FEET' maFXTV T . -1111 .r~«<.. p ,zs WIRC, WC 1000 PROPERTY MM "0" 1 - ANN No m w a j4A 0-9 )4.2 f4.4 y49-1 SEE gG. W. 107 -Y6.p $ PLAY amum WTW 1APW f.42Ac WTLN SEE M1]~J WTCN lM- xxez w LEE SIDE SEC. W. 106 LINE 1T-10- gt4 min -11.9 FM M. W. WTCN LEE wsx M1" \ , ,ya 1, 1 -19-9 a zes gE gt. 110. - 1 TA P P. 0. 10-TD-9 14iEG gE gG 10. \ J 421-v 105-OI-005.1 16 w I,IpG 106-9-0 II-IJ'9 FEE ~m b D w y / e`w' 'LZ J-J1- tas-of-ox.3 q z I1-15-0 I SEE gLW. 6 S 'O~'` ~ ~n 'S ] ~J' i • ~ m D f x 5 Y 1tx~lcl FOR RICE. M. 11 N Lc 1? 'b 1 15 19p0 SEE gL W. oo-n-0 m . 4 5 - ~ O 1 l]pld * ~tr'ON 15 114-02-001.2 or 6 Ix-n-° 'b v rb k yOPIG 02-06-01 ,i S 2 . l3 5 m ° 9° 19 O2-27-0 I d 'L6 tJ " LIRJ 3 + m 2 w 12 )BST - ° 01-U-01 I q4a .Ot ? 4 ` x u. ,11 W 06-11-01 'i 6 u J • •!1 1` 6 Pnne I 6 w9 1° +y y )S• . 0°-1 'Y ~9 o•LJ tk 5 ) © ~'F 11=02-.0 2 _ ~ GRF' /(,1 1-OS-0 ~ b O 1 w ,LPWPIG ,I 0 u 5-10-0 '~1 M1 $.a e . 1 p r 1 5 ° 6 1° °g 10 4 \ 3D -O I a ° Y ,F e-30-0 l.)qd m .x - Lr 5-26-0 6.05-0 )"Q'96. ~w S61WE MA,~RtfCK l1 A6 1016-m I 1 O ° s T 09-220 150°1 m- / 0 1•b- ~qb\c II-0}01 lPo 16 15 M1 J\. ~J/ Or tD:M1 Y Y `6. V AL T 5 • \m qL \ r J- ~ "i axV A. 1 y 1J T in ° \VA Am`AV A A\" '3Y s f Dl~ac Tl a~l]L•9}2 ' 1• • - W'. II II A A\\\ 1•AVAD 1\a \ell n Y~ e J I I•' ~ \ 5\ \ `6 yq ryy I I al I t • s * w] 2] s a ~ Ya- O ~ III II )l,)•~I~T \ L~ c'b%\ w` iqy % ,/m - T ~ 4 J q • AL-T 1 IN (~'iT l V ,~\s ~V - s5> i TSJ` sAD _ q 1. ,p lea s d,ll I k6F.1 y a\ m\ \a. \JS a. i Ol JC' DSa °nl I R 1.1 - I Y.'1 . \ Pl \ 1 .e a t T°q ° I I I I 6 .r \a Ts\ \ D° P. T~ 19.J a eqN i°a °`?I~-m' ll]I I J- I '`n I)" N`\ K+\ \ q.. ] a, - 11u<G 20 6 ' 6 I I 10.\ \ 1e- a^1 I ' i I I ~ len \ ,,S \ : 'f,6 l.,un Tt ylr I I m sl \ \ rr ~e e s q: "J 'OR veL. W. ` I sa ~ I 1 a°~" lo- ~y \ \ 1>a s-9~ e c SEE SEC. W. m`I 1 I I I 1 11 I- ~o l 5R IP. 'b vt-of-ozo •P) I 1° $ 1 I I I r, ya+ ..I 1 I ' = 1° bi Nill - s e .61 s-. s.o4 s ' fl• %1 : elm II 1 I I 11 .5 I .I 6 I "s I°,.1 111 1 I s 1 )SJ <4 -s` ° , 1q.La % 14g SIT 5 1 11CV~~ I,w I I , 19.zs p, 1 .ml ~I 1 1 1 tt - I b e ti 1 s A ' I,.• ,m N 19ga.J ~Nm E21°' r.l 1"11 I is la. TO, 1 S 1 I I f . T' + 4 9~' 9lly 6 s .1 I 1 leH I U-nIJ a v I a I~qy I n'] i 1 1 19.15 ' .n ro 611 ` D11lPD .w1 9 I I s~~ Tq9 T T I 2.441-1 5 % 19.19 - T %Na 1916 y y 13 a g Y 6 19.26 O VaJ 3°.OA 19.24 s )M1 .n .1d1lo0 1qa cT yli LOA ~ t y 0 f 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLO 19.11 y • P M1 igaJ CIXMTY CE $UEECIM 2.34tct n +s OERAxrrbnT itt¢LwNF.rt xl.xss. ~ L.. _ °a a ® @ .9a .6 1Y O o 2S 19.z lq4 L011 PCL. NO, 5.04 3,.°4 np m . .e SEE 112-01-002 %0 15 24 22 § 111b ]i.3P S.OA 6.04 ' S 4' o Tp2 b1a b° ~ 11Ta N I s 23 21 q .j S.OA - 5.54 `u FOR PLL. N0. ''OJ y / I SEE ff0. W. T° a' l3 R0.) 120-05-001 • LINE 11a aP g a 26A1c1 I~p1H _ _ - LME WTCH lz At MATLl1 a `a. d 10 , 11 L•,Fl. D 3• SEE SEC. x0.121 SEE SEC. W. 121 1 R ~\E oP D • PpD M\D © P SOUTHOLD SECTION NO _ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK r P L n Irc LL I mx gemr x~.uk u.. - _ ae`zs Nm 1 ,.Enin.i° 11. i oIlToloWEP,ES l NOTICE .III— A .11o ..D x4w,E„A„LE, SALE OR ,Real Property Tax Servi ce Agency T WEE AGE OF 113 E mwm.g.b. 1217 'pN041 x.w.xT CISTRgu,ION a IN' PoR,uu OF ,IE Canty Center AivvMad, N Y 11901 D Mel m.er.rc ^~-T " air Nn.t~ « 'rx1 SIFFRx CC IY T1x YAP IS PROW BITEO ` Y<Lf N EfEI: / Il~ lid IEIPCI Iq E 1:11 Im• w••"'x• --L-- x «nI .11. ,mTTE. PcnussON of THE p laaa PROPERTY MAP N w i wre vw i-` REAL PnWENn , x sCRME AUICr. ew u..s....e x5 12.1 Alm or tz.u - O °...~e. Am m,.we..e tz.l MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE S0UTyOIO Southold, NY 11971 Chair V` OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR u+ 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON Q L. TOWNSEND (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 14, 2006 Ms. Nancy Steelman Samuels & Steelman Architects 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Premium Wine Group Located on the n/s/o of County Road 48 at the n/w intersection of CR 48 and Cox Neck Lane known as 35 Cox Neck Lane in Mattituck SCTM#1000-121-6-1 Zone: LB District Dear Ms. Steelman: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, March 13, 2006: WHEREAS, the amended site plan is for the new building addition of 5384 sq. ft. added to the existing two buildings 20,585 sq. ft. on a 3.563-acre parcel in the LB Zone located on the n/s/o of County Road 48 at the n/w intersection of CR 48 and Cox Neck Lane known as 35 Cox Neck Lane in Mattituck, SCTM 1000-121-6-1; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiates the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this unlisted action; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, April 10, 2006, at 6:00 p.m. for a final public hearing on the maps dated September 29, 2005 and last revised December 21, 2005. Premium Wine Group March 14, 2006 Page Two Please refer to the enclosed copy of Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, in regard to the Town's notification procedure. The notification form is enclosed for your use. You may pick up the sign and the post at the Planning Board Office, Southold Town Annex. Please return the enclosed Affidavit of Posting along with the certified mailing receipts AND the signed green return receipt cards before 12:00 noon on Friday, April 7th. The sign and the post must be returned to the Planning Board Office after the public hearing. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, erily~dhouse Chairperson encs. cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Southold Town Solid Waste District Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Suffolk County Department of Public Works File • Southold Town Planning Board Notice to Adjacent Property Owners You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a site plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#1000-121-6-1; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the Light Business District, Zone LB; 4. That the application is for a new building of 5,384 sq.ft. added to the existing two buildings of 20,585 sq.ft. on 3.563-acre parcel in the LB Zone located on the n/s/o of County Road 48 at the n/w intersection of CR 48 and Cox Neck Lane known as 35 Cox Neck Road in Mattituck; 5. That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. (2nd Fl., North Fork Bank). Or, if you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765-1938; 6. That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Monday, April 10, 2006 at 6:00 p.m. in the Meeting Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times, published in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owner's Name(s): Premium Wine Holding LLC Date: 3/27/06 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on I have sent notices, by certified mail - return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across on Your Name (print) Signature Address Date Notary Public PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY., noon, Fri., 417/06 Re: Proposed Amended Site Plan: Premium Wine Group SCTM#: 1000-121-6-1 Date of Hearing: Monday, April 10, 2006, 6:00 p.m. i PREMIUM WINE HOLDING LLC AMENDED SITE PLAN FOR PREMIUM WINE GROUP 1000=121=6=1 Proposal for new building addition of 5,384 sq.ft. to the existing two buildings of 20,585 sq.ft. on a 3.563-acre parcel in the LB Zone. MON. - APRIL 10, 2006 - 6:00 P.M. ~rnr, FA 41 MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBER • P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Of so P, to Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR G 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON ~O (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND D~ye0um Southold, NY f ` Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 14, 2006 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Premium Wine Group 35 Cox Neck Lane Mattituck, NY SCTM#1000-121-6-1, Zone: LB District Requested Action: The proposed action involves an amended site plan for a new building addition of 5,384 sq. ft. added to the existing two buildings 20,585 sq. ft. on 3.563 acres parcel in the LB Zone. The site is located on the n/s/o County Road 48 at the n/w intersection of CR 48 and Cox Neck Lane known as 35 Cox Neck Lane in Mattituck, SCTM 1000-121-6-1. The site plan proposes a new 5,384 sq. ft. one-story addition to connect the two separate buildings that exist on the property. SEQRA Classification: Type I ( x ) Unlisted Contact Person: Amy Ford, Senior Planner (631) 765-1938 Premium Wine Group* • Lead Agency Coordination Request Page 2 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: ( x ) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Very truly yours, Jenlyv n B. Woodhouse Chairperson cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Southold Town Solid Waste District Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Suffolk County Department of Public Works File S A M U E L S& S T E E L M A N March 13, 2006 Mr. Bruno Semon Planning Department Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Premium Wine Group - Site Plan Approval 35 Cox Neck Road Mattituck, NY 11952 Dear Bruno, As per our discussion, I spoke with Russell Hearn, owner of Premium Wine Group, regarding the existing lighting at the sign along Route 48 and Planning Board's concern that the light source is not shielded from view. Mr. Hearn indicated to me that he will resolve the issue to the satisfaction of the Board. If we can answer any questions or provide any additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Siin ely, y tee man R.A. %n,n Samu Is & Steelman Architects r 6 h MAR ARCHITECTS 25235 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 (631) 734-6405 FAX (631) 734-6407 s~~F hO~~pF SO~T~OIO Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Fax (631) 765-9502 P.O. Box 1179 G Telephone (631) 765-1802 Southold, New York 11971-0959 2~OOUNTI,p BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLIY (.a N~~R - 7 2006 MEMORANDUM d 1 TO: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Planning Board Chairperson FROM: Michael J. Verity, Building Department DATE: March 6, 2006 REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN ELEMENTS & CERTIFICATION Project: Premium Wine Group Location: North Road Mattituck SCTM# 1000 - Section 121 - Block 6 - Lot I Date: September 29, 2005 Revised Date: December 21, 2005 1. ALL BUILDINGS AND USES SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTERS 45 AND 100 OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE. 2. OFF STREET PARKING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 3. ALL FENCING, SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 4. THE PROPOSED USE * Winery IS/ARE A PERMITTED USE IN THIS LB DISTRICT AND IS SO CERTIFIED. * See ZBA File # 5784 Michael J. Vert ' Chief Building Inspector Office Location: h~~~ OGy Mailing Address: o ~ Town Annex /First Floor, North Fork Bank y x 53095 Main Road 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) • P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 y Southold, NY 11971-0959 http://southoldtown.norlhfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax (631) 765-9064 nnn° iJUD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF DECEMBER 1, 2005 ZB File No. 5784 - Premium Wine Group LLC - Property Location: 35 Cox Neck Road and Sound Avenue (C.R. 48), Mattituck CTM ~21=s-1 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's 3.563 acre lot has 337.83 feet along the north side of Middle Road (at the end of C.R. 48 a/k/a Sound Road), and 428.85 feet along the west side of Cox Neck Road, Mattituck. The premises currently consists of two 60 ft. wide buildings facing County Road 48 (a/k/a Middle or Sound Road) with 60 feet between the two buildings, shown on the January 12, 1989 survey, amended May 14, 2001 by Peconic Surveyors, P.C. The property is located in the Limited Business Zone District. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's August 9, 2005 Notice of Disapproval, citing Section 100- 83C in its denial of an application for a building permit to construct additions and alterations connecting two existing buildings. The reason stated by the Building Inspector in the denial is that the new construction will be greater than 60 linear feet of frontage on one street. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on November 17, 2005 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant wishes to building an addition connecting the two separate buildings that exist on the property, as shown on the August 26, 2005 site plan prepared by Samuels & Steelman, Architects. The one-story addition will be 60 feet wide by 87 feet deep in front of the existing outdoor tank/fermentation area, although the setback from the southerly front property line will be greater than 153 feet. The front (south) section of the building includes a proposed open, roofed-over porch to match the remainder of the building. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Grant of the variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The 60 ft. wide by 87 ft. addition links the two buildings together as additional support for vinicultural production. The new addition will include an open, covered walkway, production and related office areas, providing an increased indoor (enclosed) circulation for the staffs activities. The addition Page 2 - December 1, 2005 ZB File Ref. 5784 - Premium Wine Group, LLC CTM 121-6-1 on the north side will not be easily noticed from any direction since the addition will be set back at least 153 feet from the southerly front lot line. The addition will not be visible from the easterly side of the buildings facing Cox Neck Road. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. Due to the logistics of the winery production business, and need for interior circulation to increase productivity and number of barrels that can be maximized for vinicultural production, instead of walking in and out of the building. An enclosed internal circulation close to the work areas would not be possible unless the buildings were linked together. 3. The variance granted herein is substantial. The code limits the width of buildings on one street to 60 feet. The width of the building on the side street (Cox Neck Road) exceeds 60 feet. The width of the building on the main thoroughfare (County Road 48) will be an additional 60 feet in length, instead of a 60 ft. wide yard area between the two existing winery buildings. 4. The difficulty was self-created since the applicant's needs outgrew their existing base of business and needed to expand production with an interior circulation. 5. No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this community of business uses and agricultural uses will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 6. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to provide an addition for an enclosed circulation area, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Orlando, seconded by Member Simon, and duly carried, to GRANT the variance as applied for, as shown on the August 26, 2005 site plan and diagrams prepared by Samuels & Steelman, Architects. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Oliva (Chairwoman), Orlando, gG,o.._ehringer, Dinizio, and Simon. This Resolution was duly adopted (5-0). Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman 1/44-1/06 Approved for Filing MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS pf SO!/ryo P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS C49 Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS G~ ~Q 54375 State Route 26 MARTIN H. SIDOR (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) GEORGE D. SOLOMON yCOUSouthold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Town of Southold Planning Board From: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: December 29, 2005 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Premium Wine Group SCTM #1000-121-6-1 Zone: LB This amended site plan is for a proposed 5384 sq ft addition to the existing building in the LB zoning district. The property is located n/s/o of County Road 48 at the nw intersection of CR 48 and Cox Neck Lane also known as 35 Cox Neck Road in Mattituck. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 95, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the Policy Standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. Please advise the applicant of the following recommendations to further Policy 5. To further Policy 5, and protect and improve the water quality and supply in the area, it is recommended that the following best management practices be required: 1. Require the use of gutters, leaders and subsurface drywells to retain and dispose of surface runoff. 2. Require the use of native plants and encourage the use of disease-resistant and drought-tolerant plants in any landscaping. 3. Require low flow faucets and toilets as recommended by Suffolk County Water Authority. Pursuant to Chapter 95, the Planning Board shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Please contact me at (631) 765-1938 if you have any questions regarding the above. P 6S. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK • STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES BRIAN L. HARPER, M.D., M.P.H. COMMISSIONER November 28, 2005 Bruno Semen Planning Board Office PO Box 1179 Town Hall Annex, 54375 State Rte. 25 Southold, New York 11971 ~r_~ 2 05 RE: Premium Wine Group - Site Plan SCTM#: 1000-121-6-1 Dear Mr. Semon: The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS; "Department") has received your letter dated November 4, 2005 concerning the above-referenced project. Based on a review of the subject coordination, the Department offers the following comments. However, the Department wishes to reserve its right to provide more detailed information within the comment period(s) established for this action. These comments should not be construed as an implicit SCDHS approval or rejection of the project. All applications are reviewed thoroughly with respect to Suffolk County Sanitary Code concerns by appropriate departmental personnel when SCDHS applications are completed. 1. SANITARY CODE A. Article VI Application Status: Our agency has received an application for the above-referenced project (HD Ref # C10-02- 0002), as required by Article VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. The application is incomplete pending the submission of the following additional technical information: • SPDES "D" application form • Certificate of Authorization • Locations, dates, and results of soil borings of test holes • Revised Site plans including sewage disposal system data (discharge data, design calculations, profile/detail of the system, invert elevations, and 50% expansion area for leaching pools). • Complete project C10-99-0013 DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, OFFICE OF ECOLOGY 360 Yaphank Avenue, Suite 26, Yaphank, NY 11980 (631) 852-5750 Fax(631)852-5812 The applicants must comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code and relevant construction standards for water supply and sewage disposal. Design and flow specifications, subsurface soil conditions, and complete site plan details are essential to the review of this project. These considerations are reviewed completely at the time of SCDHS application. B. SCDHS Jurisdiction The SCDHS maintains jurisdiction over the final location of sewage disposal and water supply systems. The applicant, therefore, should not undertake the construction of either system without Health Department approval. The Department appreciates the opportunity to participate in the SEQRA review of this proposal. Additional information may be provided prior to the close of the established comment period. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at 852-5750. Sincerely, P 00,44'. Philip de Blasi Environmental Analyst Office of Ecology PD/amf PC: Kimberly Shaw Walter Hilbert, P.E. J v,% F- S A M U E L S& S T E E L M A N December 21, 2005 ©G Mr. James Richter p Office of the Engineer Town of Southold PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Premium Wine Group - Site Plan Approval 35 Cox Neck Road Mattituck, NY 11952 Dear Mr Richter, Enclosed, please find a copy of the revised Site Plan for the above mentioned project with additional information you had requested. If we can answer any questions or provide any additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Sincere , Sam s & Steel n Architects Nan S ` man, R.A. encl. - cc: Mr. Bruno Semon, Site Plan Reviewer ARCHITECTS 25235 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 (631) 734-6405 FAX (631) 734-6407 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK • 5 STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS RICHARD J. LAVALLE, P.E. CHARLES J. BARTHA, P.E. LESLIE A. MITCHEL CHIEF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER DEPUTY COMMISSIONER December 23, 2005 Town of Southold Planning Department PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Bruno Semen, Senior Site Plan Reviewer L 22 Re: CR 48, Middle Road Premium Wine Group - SCTM #1000-121-6-1 Dear Mr. Semon: This Department has reviewed the above-referenced site plan and offers the following comments: A permit from this Department will not be required. We have reviewed this development and find that no additional improvements within the County right-of-way in the vicinity of this site will be required. Please be advised the CR 48 right-of-way is not to be used for storage, staging or access during construction. The applicant must install temporary fencing along the property's frontage on CR 48 to preclude illegal use of or access to the County right-of-way during construction. The applicant will be held responsible for maintaining the County right-of-way during construction. No access will be permitted to CR 48 for this development or any future project involving this site. If you have any questions, kindly contact this office at 8524100. Very truly yours, William Hillman, P.E. Chief Engineer By: 71-L pi tk-, Bianca Dresch, P.E. Civil Engineer WH:BD:dm cc: Nancy Steelman c/o Premium Wine Group SUFFOLK COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER (630852-4010 335 YAPHANK AVENUE ¦ YAPHANK. N.Y. 1 1980 ¦ FAX (631) 852.41 SO PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MAIIdNG ADDRESS; JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Of so~ryo~ Southold, NY 11971 Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS G ~ _ Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR @ 54375 State Route 26 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) yCOUN1Y, Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: December 6, 2005 To: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector Jamie Richter, Town Engineer From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer& Re: SC DPW response to the Amended Site Plan for the Premium Wine Group 35 Cox Neck Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-121-6-1 Status: Amended site plan be processed. In reference to the above, attached you will find a letter from the SC DPW dated November 28, 2005. The SCDPW indicates a "request that the Town refrain from issuing any approvals or permits for this project until we have had an opportunity to advise" on the amended site plan. The agent of the application has been notified to contact the SCDPW by letter and sent a 239F form. Attached is the letter sent to the agent on December 6, 2006. This amended site plan is for includes a New Building addition of 5384 sq.ft. added to the existing two buildings 20,585 sq.ft. on 3.563 acres parcel in the LB Zone located on the n/s/o of County Road 48 at the nw intersection of CR 48 and Cox Neck Lane also known as 35 Cox Neck Road in Mattituck. SCTM#(s) 1000-121.-6-1 Thank you in advance. cc: file Enc., SCDPW letter & Nancy Steelman letter r PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS a MAILING ADDRESS: of SOBox 1179 WOODHOUSE Southold, NY 11971 Chair `l? WILLIAM J. CREMERS OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR 64375 State Route s 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON Sout (cor. Main ut Rd. & l Youngs Ave.) hold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Fax: 631 765-3136 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 6, 2005 Suffolk County Department of Public Works Ms. Bianca Dresch, P.E. 335 Yaphank Avenue Yaphank, NY 11980 Re: Site Plan for Premium Wine Group 10105 35 Cox Neck Road Mattituck, NY SCTM# 1000-121-6-1 Dear Ms. Dresch, In receipt of your letter dated November 28, 2005, attached you will find an amended site plan copy for the location mentioned above. The amended site plan copy is sent to you for a preliminary review. Be advised the agent of this application was sent a copy of the 239f form and notified by letter to contact SCDPW. Enclosed is a copy of the letter sent for your files. Additionally, we forwarded a copy of your letter to the Southold Town Building Inspector and Town Engineer. Please send us concerns and or comments with respect to the proposed build out. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. /~R/esgect~f'ully y rs, V Brn hem Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file Eric, site plan & letter PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MAILING ADDRESS: JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Sf7uTG P.O. Box 11 Chair Southold, NY 11971 1 WILLIAM J. CREMERS OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR ~pQ 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) ~~~oUNtv,' Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1838 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Fes' 631 766.3136 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 6, 2005 Ms. Nancy Steelman Samuels and Steelman 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Engineers letter, ARC minutes, SC DPW letter & SC Planning Commission for the amended site plan for Premium Wine Group 10105 35 Cox Neck Road Mattituck, NY SCTM# 1000-121-6-1 Dear Ms. Steelman, Enclosed you will find a copy of the letter dated December 1, 2005 from the Southold Town Engineer, A.R.C minutes of the December 1, 2005 meeting, letter from the Suffolk County (SC) Dept. of Public Works (DPW) and a letter from the SC Planning Commission. In reviewing the letters noted above, the Planning Board held a work session on December 5, 2005 and accepted the letters. Please review the enclosed letters and minutes. Please revise the amended site plan as required based on the comments of the Town Engineer. Submit the revised amended site plan to the Planning Department for review; we will need the revision to continue the amended site plan process. In addition, contact the SCDPW and submit the required materials for review. This is to notify you that the Planning Department will need to obtain the following approvals and or comments before the Planning Board can approve this site plan: SEQR, LWRP, Town Engineer and Southold Town Building Department. You are required to verify agency requirements, submit required agency documents and obtain approvals from the following: Town ZBA, NYS DEC SPEDES SCDPW, SCDHS if required and SCWA. Attached is a copy of the 239F form required by the SCDPW. 0 Page Two, Premium Wine Group, December 6, 2005 If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 x5019 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respectfully your L 0 Semen Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file enc. SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE December 1. 2005 The ARC met at the Town Hall at 4:00 p.m. Members present were Architects Glynis Berry and Ural Talgat, Co- Chairmen Sanford Hanauer and Robert Keith as well as Nicholas J. Planamento, Howard Meinke, Herbert Ernest and Ronald McGreevy. Also present were Victor L'Eplattenier and Bruno Semon of the Planning Board staff, as well as Myron and Donna Goldstein for ELI Karnpgrounds and Ellen McNeilly of the Orient Association. Moved by Howard tV'Ieinke ;Intl seconded by Ronald N cGiecw, it i, ii, REL 01,A 'I D to APPROVE, the NllLN'II'fESaf the mec(ing of September 6, 200 . Vole of the Committee: Ave.s 6Ul. ELf JiAN 'GROUNDS (North Road - Greenpolt) SCTNIh 1000--10- 3->) lftcr lealluno of llns +ppkillion to male le-:d an overflow. L~i:iss Im f in ; loi. it , ;i, RLSOL LD I3I' Ilowarcl yfeiuha and seconded by Sanfbid I Ianau~i to I I'I''I' iin proposal as drawn as there are Lm' archileclur:Il aspects. The Committee does recommend to the Plaruwig Boal'cl that cedars be us;~l 10 provide the screening along the berm on the North Road Sick, (lus inac.id of d~ iiluous plantinL)s which would not be effective in the winter. Vole of the C'onurhiuee' Av Lcs ;Ill. Applicants are reminded that de\,ialions Iionh approved iii rcvienc and approval of the Architectural Review Couvnittce ME Lain, I;ci;sinn ul ;h. O ligi lal approval and may negatively nnpact Upon Secuii ng the l- II II~:IIC oI C l~Cilh;l ll J'. ORIENF FIRE. llfSTRICT (Route 25 - Orient) SC f Nfri 1000-15 >-13 1 i3nin5ea~hon rceused hutlself. \4oved by Robert Keith and Seconded by Heibeirt H rst, it w;is kFSOI,A I_I) I,1 FABLE the APPLICATION awaiting elevations, colors, etc of (he equipuhrnl d ),k which the Connnittee considered to be sulictures to be reviewed. l'hc (bmniHec 1.'co11u1lands 10 Ilhe Plnnnin-% Boanl ,ma Inc A ,pli and ill, of the prow rita to tho 11is1011c DiS(I'lcl and the rcudcntial area. the eyuipnlcnl hldl ,111 and Ih;; lower be moved from [lie center of an open field to ;i loealion ,idjaLrw I( it ; fuehouse. This and other steps could conceal the fornaer. "Ihc Comnulta also tad tl the antennae at the top of the pole datracis from i[s disguise as ;i flag pd~ _ Votc of the Cominiltee' Avze' :Ul. S'i.ANI'' _MALLON BUILDING (32S 45 Main Poild- ('uFd1O'rllL i 5( \P i i 1 :J-i~- qrC ,I \loved by Howard NleinRe and seconded by Nicholas Plammemo, ii n;ts RF SOL,A J J) to 1':~BLE the APPLICATION awaiting a re(Irawing of and available details of the siyaage. Vote of the Committoa:,ves ,All. AL-CKC.OiMNIONS(NlainRoad on 1000-11-1-11-17 New3uffoll :wenuc- laiiituchi S('!\(~ MO ed bay Ural IalgaI and seconded by Howard Nleutl:e, it was IMSOLAW) 7 BLE the APPLICATION as incomplete. mvailir>> the item, specified on the Alb checklist, I he ConnKNee suggests to the Planning Board and the Applicant 0ji, in consideralion of the location on the Main Road near the shopping Center, the ai~lut Should hnvc a hamlet fccluag. ^Vso the location on a dangerous cmvc ar~,ucs Im ::n enunne'e on New .Sutioll< ~lvenu~:. Vote of the Conutlittee: Ayes all. PREN~'DUiM WINE GROUP (North Road to Cox Neck Lane - n9atti;ucla S(' J 1006 121-6-1. Gel Alm reatsecl himself. aftu reviewing an addition eotuiecting the two existing slruwure.s and teaming uLii the materials and eoloas would be matching, it was moved by Arbon Li nest amd ~ •"vn, _ by Ronald McGrevvv to APPROVE the APPLICATION as submitted. V'otc of the C onarauttee: Ayes .all. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved dra~~ut~~; ~\ithuut alit I e\ m% and app Im aI of the AfCh lee4tral Committee will cause recision of the uri<_,m:il approaal and maV' neg,rttVcly impact upon secutirtt; the C'ertilicate of O ,upanc~. Robes l1' I~.~ith Co-C'hahman 40COUNTY OF SUFFOLK 9 STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS RICHARD J. LAVALLE, P.E. CHARLES J. BARTHA, P.E. LESLIE A. MITCHEL CHIEF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER DEPUTY COMMISSIONER November 28, 2005 Town of Southold Planning Department PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer RE: CR 48, Middle Road Premium Wine Group - SCTM #1000-121-6-1 Dear Mr. Semon: We are in receipt of plans for the referenced project. Please be advised: A permit from this Department will be required pursuant to Section 136 of the Highway Law for any improvements this Department deems necessary along the County right-of-way. Before a permit is issued by this Department for these improvements, documentation pursuant to Section 239F of the New York State General Municipal Law must be forwarded to us from the Town Building Department for our review and comments. We will perform a detailed review, including a site visit. We request the Town refrain from issuing any approvals or permits for this project until we have had an opportunity to advise your office of the results of our review. If you have any questions, kindly contact this office at 852-4100. Very truly yours, William Hillman, P.E. - Chief Engineer By: w"'-- Bianca Dresch, P.E. Civil Engineer WH:BD:dm cc: Premium Wine Group SUFFOLK COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER (631) 335YAPHANK ¦ YAPHANKN.Y.11980 852-0010 , ¦ FAX (631) 8524150 gUFFO(,~c r5 JOSHUA Y. HORTON JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. SUPERVISOR s ENGINEER TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Fax. (631) - 765 - 9015 Tel. (631) - 765 - 1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse December 1, 2005 Chairperson - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Premium Wine Group - Amended Site Plan Cox Neck Road, Mattituck, New York SCTM 1000-121-06-01 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: As per a request from your office, I have reviewed the amended site plan for the above referenced facility. This site plan is dated 9/29/05 and was prepared by the office of Samuels & Steelman, Architects. Please consider the following: 1. Approval of this addition will require a determination from the Zoning Board of Appeals. Article X. Section 100-83.C. requires a Project to be divided into separate structures so that no single structure will have more than 60 lineal feet of frontage on a street. The original Site Plan had ZBA approval to deviate from this requirement with respect to frontage on Cox Neck Road. At that time, the ZBA did not waive the requirement for the frontage on Sound Avenue. The proposed addition will effectively create one building with frontage on Sound Avenue that is one hundred eighty (180') feet wide. This item should be coordinated with the Building Department. 2. Drainage Calculations have not been provided. The Proposed new construction will encroach upon the locations of existing drainage structures that will need to be relocated. Drainage calculations should include all new roof footprints and areas that are to be developed. These areas will require additional drainage structures to contain the run-off generated by the new addition. 3. Did the Planning Board receive a recommendation from the local Fire Commissioners with respect to Fire Protection? Has a Fire Well or Hydrant been requested or required? If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact my office. Sin a ly, J m e s A. Ri to , A. cc: Peter Harris, Superintendent of Hi YS Michael Verity, Principal Building 11 ector 0 %o,F COUNTY OF SUFFOLK a STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING THOMAS ISLES, AICP DIRECTOR OF PLANNING November 25, 2005 Town of Southold Planning Bd. 53095 Main Road - P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Bruno Semon, Sr. Site Plan Reviewer Pursuant to Section 239L & M of the General Municipal Law, the following site plan which have been submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is/are considered to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact(s). A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Site Plan Local File No. Premium Wine Group 1000-121-6-1 Comment: In the future, on all site plan referrals, please include a "Full Statement of Facts" including the completed local application form, any and all staff reports pertinent to the action, SEQRA documents, etc. NOTE: Does not constitute acceptance of any zoning action(s) associated therewith before any other local regulatory board. Very truly yours, Thomas Isles, AICP Director of Planning -14p, 1 er Andrew P. Freleng, C Chief Planner APF:cc G:\CCHORNYIZONING\ZONING\W ORKING\LD2004\239LD. W PD LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H. LEE DENNISON BLDG. - 4TH FLOOR P. O. BOX 6100 (631) 853-5190 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788-0099 TELECOPIER (631( 853-4044 ROBERT W. KEITH 995 `A II,LIS CREEK DRIVE Ntk,rTITIJCK, NY 11952 631/298-8508 November 21, 2005 Mr. Bruno Sernon, Senior Site Plan Revriewer Phin-in_r Board. 'Town of Southold Dear Nh. Semon. This will acknowledge receipt of the following Agency Referral Requests: Orient Piro District, 18-5-13.8 E1,1 Kampgounds, 40-3-5 1Vlalon Industries, 97-5-4.5 Mattituck Commons, 114-I1-17 Premium Wine Croup, 121-6-1 The Ardtitectural ]review Comntittee will take up these submissions at its next mectutg. Yours sincerer. I-L1w Lrl Co-Cltammin r_ h`' PLANNING BOARD MEMBER'S • MAILING ADDRESS: JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE OF SOUTyo~ Sou hOoid,oNY 11971 Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR ~pQ 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) U~ Southold, NY Telephone- 631 765-1938 Fax. 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE November 18, 2005 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Robert Keith 994 Willis Creek Drive Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Architectural Review Committee Site Plan Agency Referral Requests Dear Mr. Keith: I am forwarding copies of the following five Site Plan Agency Referral Requests, with applications attached, for review by the Architectural Review Committee: Site Plan Suffolk County Tax Map No Orient Fire District 18-5-13.8 ELI Kampgrounds 40-3-5 Malon Industries 97-5-4.5 Mattituck Commons 114-11-17 Premium Wine Group 121-6-1 Respectfully you g, /Bruno emo Senior Site Plan Reviewer encs. - s MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBE ~q soar P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE 0~ y0l Southold, NY 11971 Chair Q OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS G Q 54375 State Route 25 MARTIN H. SIDOR~ (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) GEORGE D. SOLOMON 40um N ' Southold, NY I'111 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Date: November 15, 2005 To: Ruth Oliva, Chairwoman, Zoning Board of Appeals From: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Planning Board Chai V~ 1 14- Re: Appeal # 5784 for Premium Wine Group SCTM: 1000-121-6-1 In response to your memo dated November 3, 2005 the Planning Board held a Work Session on November 14, 2005 to further review the site plan and offers the following comments: 1. The Planning Board received a site plan application on October 31, 2005. 2. The Planning Board reviewed a site plan prepared by Nancy Steelman, Architect, dated September 29, 2005. 3. The Planning Department classified this as a complete site plan and on October 31, 2005 referred the site plan out to agencies with jurisdiction. 4. This application will require the following reviews and or approvals before the Planning Board can grant final approval: Southold Town Building Inspector certification, Southold Town Engineers/Highway, Mattituck Fire District, Suffolk County Department of Public Works, Suffolk County Department of Planning, Suffolk County Department of Health Services, LWRP and Architectural Review Committee. 5. The Planning Board has reviewed the site plan noted above with respect to the site plan features and requirements. The Planning Board typically prefers a site design that separates buildings exceeding 60' in length. However, the Planning Board agrees with the proposed conceptual site. They would like to see the new addition stepped back further north to break up the existing frontage. Please note with caution: some changes may occur based on comments and approvals from other jurisdictions. Ruth Oliva Premium Wine Group November 15, 2005 Page Two We hope these comments will be useful to the ZBA in its review of this appeal. Thank you in advance. cc: Planning Board MAITUCK FIRE DISTRICT i 9,J OF PO BOX 666, PIKE STREET 69 MATTITUCK, NEW YORK 11952-0666 Commissioners MARTIN LGRIFFIN, SR. Chairman John C. Harrison, Secretary Barbara Dickerson, Treasurer Greg N. Tyler, Vloe Chairman James D. Roache Norman A. Reilly, Jr. Jerome Zuhoskl November 10, 2005 Mr. Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer Southold Town Planning Board P 0 Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 RE: SCTM# 1000421-6-1 Dear Mr. Semon; At the Regular meeting of the Board of Fire Commissioners, the Board reviewed the site plan for Premium Wine Group (SCTM# 1000-121-6,1) at your request. The Board has no recommendations for additional fire wells in conjunction with this subdivision. Thank you in advance for your cooperation in this matter. ely C. Harrison Secretary/Fire District Manager cc: Board o" F're Commissioners Chief Office (631) 298-8837 Facsimile (631) 298-8841 ~gUFFO(,~c Office Location: pGy Mailing Address: otleF TO Town Annex /First Floor, North Fork Bank cm Z 53095 Main Road 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) co • P.O. Box 1179 ?ti Southold, NY 11971 y~Ol ~a0! Southold, NY 11971-0959 http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax (631) 765-9064 TOWN MEMO TO: Planning Board FROM: Ruth D. Oliva, ZBA Chairwoman DATE: November 3, 2005 SUBJECT: Request for Comments Our Department has received and is reviewing the following application, and enclose copies of the Building Department's Notice of Disapproval, and application with the applicant's latest map. The Planning Board may be involved under the site plan review steps under Chapter 100 (Zoning), and your review and comments are requested at this time. The file is available for review of additional documentation at your convenience. NAME TAX # / ZBA BD NOD VARIANCE PLANS PREPARER ZONE DATE DATE STAMPED Premium 121-6-1 LI 5784 08/09105 100-83C Site Plan Samluels and Wine Group Zone Addn will create dated Steelman, structure in 8/26/05 Arch. excess of 60 lin. ft. on 1 street Your comments are appreciated by 11/15/05 Thank you. EXIST. STORAGE BUILDING: 9906sf/1000 9.9 spaces V f j EXIST. OFFICE SPACE: 320 sf/100 3.2 spaces EXIST. PRODUCTION: 6,992 sf/500 13.98 spaces EXIST. FASTING ROOM: 73$ sf/150 4.92 spaces 0 DX EXIST. TOTAL,REQUIRED 32 spaces . PROPOSED PRODUCTION AREA: 4216sf/500 8.43 spaces Q } PROPOSED OFFICE AREA: 2803 sf/100 28.03 spaces O `ly Jf PROPOSED MEZZ. STORAGE 827 sf/1000 .82spaces PROPOSED MECH. STORAGE: 530 sf/1000 .53 spaces , PROPOSED TOTAL REQUIRED: 37.81 spaces Wyr Li. TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 70 spaces TOTAL EXISTING PARKING 49 spaces TOTAL NEW PARKING 21 spaces* (LAND BANKED) N, Z. O u) Q • " wJ• ~ W• ~ n W • \1" CO) cn air aF t; i sr;~~, app z 17953- i -:;F~fA AR P 0508 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: NS DATE: August 26, 2003 SEP _ 6 ZO SCALE: 5 ~ 1" = 20.,-0x, QEALS SHEET TITLE: znr,y~f::, a~nArcr n SITE PLAN SHEET NO.: S P VARIANCE ti US S A M U E L S& S T E E L M A N November 7, 2005 r I~ 1 v Mr. Bruno Semon Planning Department Town of Southold Main Road Town of Southold, NY 11971 Re: Premium Wine Group - Site Plan Approval 35 Cox Neck Road Mattituck, NY 11952 Dear Bruno, Enclosed, please find the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form that you have requested. If we can answer any questions or provide any additional information, please do not hesitate to call. f Steelma rchitects man, R.A. encl. ARCH IIECiS 25235 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 (631) 734-6405 FAX (631) 7346407 0 . MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS QF soar/ P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE O~~ yO~o Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS G ~ 54375 State Route 25 MARTIN H. SIDOR (car. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) GEORGE D. SOLOMON COUSouthold, NY n I 1 Telephone: 631 765-1935 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Date: November 4, 2005 To: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector Jamie Richter, Town Engineer Mark Terry, Local Water Revitalization Program Coordinator From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Premium Wine Group v 35 Cox Neck Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-121-6-1 Status: New application accepted by Planning Board at work session held on October 31, 2005. In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for comments, concerns and certification. This amended site plan is for includes a New Building addition of 5384 sq.ft. added to the existing two buildings 20,585 sq.ft. on 3.563 acres parcel in the LB Zone located on the n/s/o of County Road 48 at the nw intersection of CR 48 and Cox Neck Lane also known as 35 Cox Neck Road in Mattituck. SCTM#(s) 1000-121.-6-1 Site plan enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared dated 07/11/05 and received by the Planning Department on 08/04105 0 0 MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS pf P.O. Box 1179 SOplyp JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Southold, NY 11971 Chair p OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS 4 Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS G • O 54375 State Route 25 MARTIN H. SIDOR %~p (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) GEORGE D. SOLOMON I~COU M ~`f.`" Southold, NY I11, Telephone: 631 765-1935 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 7, 2005 Mr. Keogh, Secretary Mattituck Fire District PO Box 666t Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Premium Wine Group 35 Cox Neck Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-121-6-1 Dear Mr. Keogh: Enclosed please find one (1) site plan received October 6, 2005. This amended site plan is for includes a New Building addition of 5384 sq.ft. added to the existing two buildings 20,585 sq.ft. on 3.563 acres parcel in the LB Zone located on the n/s/o of County Road 48 at the nw intersection of CR 48 and Cox Neck Lane also known as 35 Cox Neck Road in Mattituck. SCTM#(s) 1000-121.-6-1 The enclosed site plan is being referred to you for fire access review and for your recommendations. Thank you for your cooperation. Very try yours, Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer enc. a 0 MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS OF sooj P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Southold, NY 11971 Chair h o OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS C02 Q 54375 State Route 25 MARTIN H. SIDOR (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) GEORGE D. SOLOMON COUSouthold, NY MEMORANDUM NDUM Telephone: 631 765-1935 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Date: November 4, 2005 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board Josh Horton, Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook Suffolk County Water Authority * Suffolk County Planning Department * Suffolk County Department of Public Works Architectural Review Committee, c/o Town Clerk Mark Terry, Local Water Revitalization Pr ram Coordinator From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Agency Referral requests required under Southold Town Code Article XXV 100-254 Review Procedure part C the Planning Board refers this site plan for concerns, comments and Jurisdiction requirements if applicable. Dear Reviewer: The site plan status is a New Active Site Plan. Below is site plan application information pertaining to the listed project: Premium Wine Group 35 Cox Neck Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-121-6-1 This amended site plan is for includes a New Building addition of 5384 sq.ft. added to the existing two buildings 20,585 sq.ft. on 3.563 acres parcel in the LB Zone located on the n/s/o of County Road 48 at the nw intersection of CR 48 and Cox Neck Lane also known as 35 Cox Neck Road in Mattituck. SCTM#(s) 1000-121.-6-1 Attached is a copy of the site plan application for your review. Thank you in advance. cc: File, attachment, *Maps are enclosed for your review TOW*)F SOUTHOLD PLANNIO BOARD SITE PLAN APPLICATION SECTION A: Site Plan Name and Location Application Date: 9 / 30 / 05 Site Plan Name: Premium Wine o p Suffolk County Tax Map #1000- 121 - 6 - 1 6C; , 6 205 Other SCTM #s: Street Address: 35 Cox Neck Rd Hamlet: Mit4-.-11 11-1 k Distance to nearest intersection: Type of Site Plan: X New Amend Residential If Amended, last approval a e: SECTION B: Owners/Agent Contact Information Please list name, mailin address, and hone number or the people below: Property Owner Premium Wine Holding LLC Street 35 Cox Neck Rd. City Mattituck State NY Zip 11952 Home Telephone Other 298-1900 Applicant Russell Hearn Street 35 Cox Neck Rd. City Matti tuck State NY Zip 11952 Home Telephone Other 298-1900 Applicant's Agent or Representative: ContactPerson(s)* Manr)r_ cr_AA1man Street 25235 Main Rd. City Cutchogue State NY Zip 11935 Office Telephone 734-6405 Other *Unless otherwise requested, correspondence will be sent only to the contact person noted here. Page 2 of 3 SECTION C: Site Data 0 • Proposed construction type: New Modification of Existing Structure -Agricultural Change f use Property total acreage or square footage: ac /sq. fl. Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage: 25, 969 ac./ q. ft. Is there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes _ No x If yes, explain: Property Zoning District(s): LB Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: _~_/__/_0_5_ Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes x No _ If yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes x No _ If yes, attach a copy of the application packet. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more then one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. List all existing property uses:-- winery List all proposed property uses: winery Other accessory uses: Existing lot coverage: 13 % Proposed lot coverage: 16.7 % Gross floor area of existing structure(s): 20s 8 S sq. ft. Gross floor area of proposed structure(s):5 -js4 Parking Space Data: # of existing spaces: 49 # of proposed spaces: 21 Loading Berth: Yes x No Landbanked Landscaping Details: Existing landscape coverage: 56 % Proposed landscape coverage: 52.64 % Waterfront Data: Is this property within 500" of a wetland area? Yes No X If yes explain: I, the undersigned, certi~ h all the abo e nfo tion is true. Signature of Prepare r~ Date: !Yzoo 0 Pan 3 of 3 Office Location: h~~N OGy Mailine Address: A Town Annex /First Floor, North Fork Bank co x 4 -a 53095 Main Road CJ 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) 0 r P.O. Box 1179 ?(i Southold, NY 11971 Southold, NY 11971-0959 viol # ~a http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax (631) 765-9064 TOWN MEMO TO: Planning Board FROM: Ruth D. Oliva, ZBA Chairwoman DATE: November 3, 2005 SUBJECT: Request for Comments Our Department has received and is reviewing the following application, and enclose copies of the Building Department's Notice of Disapproval, and application with the applicant's latest map. The Planning Board may be involved under the site plan review steps under Chapter 100 (Zoning), and your review and comments are requested at this time. The file is available for review of additional documentation at your convenience. NAME TAX # / ZBA BD NOD VARIANCE PLANS PREPARER ZONE DATE DATE STAMPED Premium 121-6-1 LI 5784 08/09/05 100-83C Site Plan Samluels and Wine Group Zone Addn will create dated Steelman, structure in 8/26/05 Arch. excess of 60 lin. ft. on 1 street Your comments are appreciated by 11/15/05 Thank you. ` EXIST. STORAGE BUILDING: 9906sf/1000 9.9 spaces W EXIST. OFFICE SPACE: 320 sf/100 3.2 spaces EXIST. PRODUCTION: 6,992 sf/500 13.98 spaces EXIST. TASTING ROOM: 738 sf/150 4.92 spaces 0 w - EXIST. TOTAI,;REQUIRED 32 spaces PROPOSED PRODUCTION AREA: 4216sf/500 8.43 spaces Q > PROPOSED OFFICE AREA: 2803 sf1100 28.03 spaces 0 PROPOSED MEZZ. STORAGE 827 sf/1000 .82spaces PROPOSED MECH. STORAGE: 530 sf/1000 .53 spaces z PROPOSED TOTAL REQUIRED: 37.81 spaces w TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 70 spaces V TOTAL EXISTING PARKING 49 spaces ` TOTAL NEW PARKING 21 spaces } (LAND BANKED) 00 z • • ~ F NO ~g- 4 2 LL ~ W • L) p {Y g L l t' Y n O • C7 l~ i r : . sT~ ~e 17!7953-1 P OJ T_ f / 0508 DRAWN BY: • CHECKED BY: NS ESEP- DATE: August 26, 2005 6 ZO SCALE: 1 20,-0.. SHEET TITLE: nr,A enLs SITE PLAN SHEET NO.: S P VARIANCE FORM NO. 3 1 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL Date: August 9, 2005 TO: Samuels & Steelman A/C Premium Wine Group 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 SEP -6 2005 Please take notice that your application dated July 12, 2005 zoNlr'? For permit to make additions and alterations connecting two existing buildings at Location of property: 35 Cox Neck Road, Mattituck, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 -Section 121 Block 6 Lot 1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction on property, located in the LB District, is not permitted pursuant to Article X, Section 100-83C., which states; "A proiect shall be divided into separate structures so that no single structure shall have more than sixty (60) linear feet of frontage on one (1) street." The total linear frontage, following the proposed construction, will be 180 linear feet. In addition-if variance is anted site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board will be re ui u rite igna e Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, following any ZBA decision, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A. 4C. • Q ? For Office Use Only K~D Fee: $ Filed By; Date Assigned/Assignment No. Office E ^"n 1 1 Notes: 74/ SPP APPLICATION TO TH SOUTHOLD TOWN ARD OF APPEALS OF Fa?pEALS Parcel Location: House No._Ir Street _"c x Neck Rd. Hamlet Mattituck SCTM 1000 Section_12_LBlock_L_Lot(s)_l_Lot Size 3 . 5 F 3 Zone District r.n I (WE) APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED: Owner as Applicant: -premium wins arras, r.r,r Mailing Address: 35 Cox Neck Rd. Mah.ti tnclr NY 11952 Telephone: 631-298-1900 Fax: NOTE: If applicant is not the owner, state if applicant is owner's attorney, aeenq arcMtecq builder, contract vendee, etc. Authorized Representative : Nancy Steelman, Samuels & Steelman Architects Address: 25235 Main Rd., Cutchogue. NY 11935 Telephone: 631-734-6405 Fax: 631-734-6407 Please specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to, from the above listed names: ? Applicant/Owner(s) 41 Authorized Representative ? Other: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED 7/11/05 FOR: 2 Building Permit ? Certificate of Occupancy ? Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ? Change of Use ? Permit for As-Built Construction Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. Indicate Article, Section, Subsection and paragraph of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code. Article X Section 100- 83C Subsection Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: .E A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ? A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. ? Interpretation of the Town Code, Article Section ? Reversal or Other A prior appeal ? has kJ has not been made with respect to this property UNDER Appeal No. -Year REASONS FOR APPEAL (ad'ditional sheets may be used with applicant's signature): AREA VARIANCE REASONS: ( See Attached Sheet) (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties if granted, because: 6 2005 (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some Iiethot6tasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: k 6F. p,,PPEpi"$. xptiet41:. „t3C D (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: (5) Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? 00Yes, or ( )No. This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the community. Check this box ( ) IF A USE VARIANCE IS BEING REQUESTED, D PLEASE MPLETE THE ATTACHED USE VARIANCE SHEET: (Please be sure to consult your attorney.) u Appellant or Authorized Agent cot m submit written Authorization from Owner) Sworn ,tto"before me this day of , 200.5 \ otary Public ,~R . 6 2005 1 SEp PATRICIA RICHARDS Notary Public, State of New York v° No. 01R16042467 V Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Expires May 30, 20C 6(_,o P~ SEP - 6 2005 Premium Wine Gro ZONING Is' =;~.e5e; APPEALS Area Variance Reasons 1. An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties if granted, because: The Premium Wine Group Facility currently consists of two 60' wide buildings facing County Road 48 with 60' between the two buildings. These buildings were originally built to conform to the Limited Business Zone's maximum building width restriction of 60 feet. As the business has grown, it has become apparent that additional space is needed and that having two separate buildings has become inefficient for a functioning winery. The proposed Addition links the two building together with additional support and production areas for the winery. This Addition will solve their spacial needs and will provide for enclosed circulation between the two buildings. The surrounding neighborhood currently consists of a strip shopping mail, landscape business, and a residence to the east; a fence company, drainage and excavation business to the south across C.R. 48; a plant nursery to the north and west. The strip shopping mall is approximately 150' long facing the road and the fence company building is 100'. These buildings both exceed the 60' width. The total length of 180' is not substantially different than the surrounding buildings and will not produce an undesirable change to the neighborhood. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other that an area variance, because: To gain additional square footage for the winery, the existing buildings could be added to in the north/south axis and increase the overall length of each of the buildings. But it would not solve a more fundamental problem of not having enclosed internal circulation between both buildings. For the winery to function as a whole, linking the two building is critical. 3. The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: The overall length of the new Addition of 60' is required to link the two existing buildings. The depth of the new addition will not effect the overall length of the link and the bulk of the addition to the north will not be seen from any direction. 4. The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: The proposed project is an addition to two existing buildings which were constructed 5 years ago. There will not be any additional impact on the environment due to this addition. V5C - 6 2005 gEP _ „eP.~0 ®F 6'gp e.CJ-~ • • ~-s S~ h S A M U E L S& S T E E L M A N September 30, 2005 Planning Department Town of Southold Main Road Town of Southold, NY 11971 Re: Premium Wine Group - Site Plan Approval 35 Cox Neck Road Mattituck, NY 11952 Dear Board Members, My client, Premium Wine Group LLC, is applying for Site Plan Approval for a proposed addition to the existing Winery. We have also applied to the ZBA for a Variance due to an proposed addition which will be in filled between the existing two buildings and increase the overall length beyond what is required in the Limited Business Zone. A Notice of Disapproval from the building department was issued on August 9, 2005 Enclosed, please find nine copies of the following information: (o 1. Cover Letter 2. Plans for the project (sheets SP, 1, 2, 3 & 4) a / 3. Site Plan Application ry Q 4. S Environmental Assessment Form 0 5. Owners Letter Of Authorization v 6. Project Description 7. Board of Appeals Application Package If we can answer any questions or provide any additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerel , Samu & Steel a Architects OCT - 6 2005 a y an, R.A. ARCwTFCrs encl. 25235 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUF, NEW YORK 11935 (631) 734-6405 FAX (631) 734-6407 SAMUELS & STEELMAN ARCHITECTS NORTH FORK BANK 12556 25235 MAIN RD. CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 50.791214 PH. 631-734-6405 9/30/2005 PAY TO THE Town of Southold $**788.00 • ORDER OF Seven Hundred Eighty-Eight and 00/100******************************** DOLLARS 8 Town of Southold MEMO Premium Wine Group 1 21 - -1 S P 11'01 255611' 1:0 214079 i 2i:u• i i 24--,00 13 1-11 2,1' I FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL Date: August 9, 2005 TO: Samuels & Steelman A/C Premium Wine Group 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 - Please take notice that your application dated July 12, 2005 For permit to make additions and alterations connecting two existing buildings at Location of property: 35 Cox Neck Road, Mattituck, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 -Section 121 Block 6 Lot 1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction on property, located in the LB District, is not permitted pursuant to Article X, Section 100-83C., which states; "A project shall be divided into separate structures so that no single structure shall have more than sixty (60) linear feet of frontage on one (1) street." The total linear frontage, following the proposed construction, will be 180 linear feet. In addition i ance anted site plan a roval from the Southold Town Planning Board will be r fired Au ho gnature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, following any ZBA decision, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A. FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY e SITE PLAN USE DETERMINATION Initial Determination Date:/ 3 Date Sent: e / 316- Project Name: P4eMIL) YJ Lib/U& OM,~o Project Address: 35- (qax tl" , ,Ao mAM7zir Suffolk County Tax Map No.:1000- /-7/ Zoning DistrW,,Zh Request: #DIXh" / QX/S-171I/6 lu/lUE7Z'1 (Note: Copy of Building Permit Application and supporting documentation as to proposed use or uses should be submitted.) Initial Determination as to whether use is permitted: - _ ~(A~2i~a~uCF Initial Determination as to whether site plan is required: Signature o ing pector Planning Department (P.D.) Referral: P.D. Date Received: l~l D1~ Date of Comment: v'- 1-,:r- Comments: Coll-CZIAA 7161 ark Al~tal£ E~ ~lTF //ihf3 Signature of Planning Dept. Staff Reviewer Final Determination Date: Decision: Signature of Building Inspector BYISIOfb 6-15-9 6 26-9 6-2]-9 II-00-96 g 0009.9 w SEE SEC. W. 113 PECONIC LANG TRUST Cpf I1 -17 -9] - MATCH LINE 1.12 MATCH LINE lvy.Vld1M / & 15-99 2.8A z-AT 1. 022)-6 4 s, L6 1 C.R q8 u, " a)-2>-0 y ,a o6-0 0 s•a> y SEE PCL. W. Y p,TN 80' a Nf. FOR SEE SEC. © FOR PCL. W. NO. 10-)1.01 # R~° rv SEE 1SEC. -0 NO. 11J-Oi-019.23 3J 06-o -01 S a M\DD~E in-01-00I in-01-00I 09-15 -01 o 530 4 1 fOR RACE. NO. 3.6A 11 5 )0-0 SEE SEC. NO. K > m 0611 c 1x0-0s-o01 cl e 1.10 2.1 01 La1 SFO 1 0106 01 s.OP 2.6AIC1 A j 4.7 4.3 = ° +M ie 1.9P + a+ IvM.MldtFlnO L9AICl /I Y 3 VI L6 saA O 500A W l.iuc' : x SOUND PVE. ls0•T 5.04 a+ 4.5 e " -N- 6 z1 I FIX A 43 i TOWN OF SOUTHOLD I'L A z.OA 6EVELwxwT .1111 m M E 1.2 R TOWN OF SWTHOLO i °n :n PECONAC LA N0 TRUST 1.1 20A 31 114A 1.10 T1A w rt .3 3.4 A 1.sA( c1 lAAlc l 1. A(,) "N DONIS) 1.4 2 IAA ' KVF ,a , r 1.OP ~x HP:r ~ItlMI ° + 2 Y A.5 ~ 31 Sp> SUFFOLK ~ 59A1 rs 'n G\ 'tl N COUNTY COUNTS OF SUFFOLK WATER S 98~ 5.9 6 \ n M.1 1U1W@tY 5.2 3.2A \ 3 1900 .re A 5.1 E' 1 R.111c1 d 5 J 9.BA \ \ m. ~p L\ 9.3 5 y, 'T 7. IN, O rL z A 103 zc gC/40 „ I czu 9 \ \ SOH I ' t 1 4 s F a' ' p z Y o 1.5 _ 113A ~ x cauNTr a SUFFOLK ?3 s 51p \D 8.5 $ 9.tA QY m n I 0 1 Or „al n COUNTY OF P ,1 6 SSP \ T Sl p SYK V SUFFOLK E PCL. W. T5 a' , LBA Ai ° M SEE 4C. W. ' ~ g SO ' N)F SR-O2-025 5.1 ILA HE n AN / s TOWN OF sWTWLO 12.J _IZ.A OC OaP 14.3 m v 19 e.4 f eT 13A I UNI.ec, 11111 i.6 / e 1J n 14..• ITOl A.tA a. I 281 I + 1.OA 18 l9 ~ s C O ! 123 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK IS 6 l5 J 20 SUFFOLK COUNTY ,!6 y WATER AUTHOITY n o 5YF 1.SA ~YJ ryry, 14.1 _ ' 2t w 4931 \ ' 11 * 22 C~ i.] 29.204.1 F 2A 25n ASEAN \ 2-4A • A 111.1 23 1 TOWN W SOUTHOLD NxoEm+uFR 1. 5 y `r• FOR PCL. W. y SEE SEC. W. F 125-01-001 Leu.1 _ LAUREL LAKE A FOR PCL. W. SEE SEC. W. 125-01-014 MATCH LNE MATCH SEE SEC. W. 125 LAW SEE SEC. W.125 - SEE SEC. W.125 MAN' u.n w~,e~u:~ -zcx- ~x.ki.~,~z T"ER FS, PROPERTIES O x v3 TURNER SECTION NO I m„P zv (D HAN A"A'T,AX _ao,°,XIYNX __P__ a. NOTICE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK C E SDUTHOLD ~ G °r um a M1s.va v T MAINTENANCE, ALTERATION SALE OR E HOT YPE 05TR16NT¢x N ANY PEET6N OF THE Red Property Tax Service A MI F- -Al - - PAN, 11, - b s x cw TAX MAP IS v O ENN}Y Eenter PoverheaQ NY 11991ency y N O n - o • . m n_ .rcc SCALE W fEEI: w M MA ac ~.o. p m 1¢1RLTro lase PROPERTY MAP 10 09-9] ~ SEE SEC. M0.114 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS SUFFO(,, CD Southol own Hall ~9ti~ Oy Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman 53095 Main Road ~ James Dinizio, Jr. y P.O. Box 1179 Lydia A. Tortora Southold, New York 11971 Lora S. Collins ZBA Fax (516) 765-9064 George Horning ~a Telephone (55516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AUG U 3 1999 FINDINGS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF JULY 28, 1999 Southold Town Pia+M,ing Board Appi. No. 4708 - LIEB CELLARS 1000-121-6-1 STREET & LOCALITY: 35 Cox Neck Lane and Middle Road (C.R. 48, a/k/a North Road), Mattituck DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: July 22, 1999 FINDINGS OF FACT PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's property is located in the Limited Business (LB) Zone District and consists of 3.563 acres (155,204.28 sq. ft. in area) with 337.83 ft. frontage along the north side of Middle Road (a/k/a Middle Road and C.R. 48), and 428.85 ft. frontage along the west side of Cox Neck Road, Mattituck. The property is vacant land. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's May 7, 1999 Notice of Disapproval citing Article VIII, Section 100-83C of the Zoning Code, stating that: "...the proposed construction on corner lot has two road frontages, two (2) structures on proposed project will exceed sixty (60) foot linear frontage on one of those road frontages while maintaining the required frontage on the other frontage." INTERPRETATION REOUESTED: Applicant's attorney asked the Board to rule that Section 100- 83C applies to frontage on "one (1) street"; in that case, since the building sides fronting Route 48 are within the 60-foot limit of Section 100-83C, the buildings would be in compliance. The Board agreed to hear this interpretation question and, after giving public notice, did so on July 22, 1999. Specifically, the Board addressed the question "whether the proposed winery building is required to have sixty (60) linear feet of frontage on one (1) street or on two road frontages." The legal notice read for the hearing held on July 22, 1999 was advertised as follows: "This is a request for an Interpretation under Article VIII, Section 100-83C which states: A project shall be divided into separate structures so that no single structure shall have more than sixty (60) linear feet of frontage on one (1) street. Applicant proposes to construct a winery on this corner lot with two road frontages (at intersection with Middle Road a/k/a C.R. 48) and requests the Board to interpret whether or not the proposed winery building is required to have sixty (60) linear feet of frontage on one (1) street or on two road frontages, as determined by the Building Department's May 7, 1999 Notice of Disapproval. Site Address: 35 Cox Neck Lane, Mattituck; Parcel 1000-121- 6-1." Page 2 - July 1, 1999 ZBA Appl. No. 4711 - Curtis Davids Parcel 1000-33-2-48 at Greenport BOARD ACTION/RESOLUTION: The Board heard testimony on the question to be addressed. The Board is cognizant of the legal principle that since zoning ordinances are in derogation of common law property rights, they must be construed strictly. On motion by Member Collins, seconded by Member Dinizio, it was RESOLVED, that the Board interprets the meaning of Section 100-83C to be that a structure shall have no more than sixty linear feet of frontage on one street, so that a structure with two street frontages satisfies Section 100-83C when it measures no more than 60 linear feet on one of those frontages; and further RESOLVED, that the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval dated May 7, 1999 is hereby reversed pursuant to this Board's authority under section 267-b1 of New York Town Law. VOTE OF THE BOARD: AYES: MEMBERS GOEHRINGER, DINIZIO, TORTORA, AND COLLINS. (Absent was Member Horning of Fishers Island.) a lutioniaas d opted (4-0). GERARD P. GOE RINGER CHAIRMAN For Filing about 8/2/99 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS SUFFO(,t ~O CC • Southold Town Hall Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman 53095 Main Road James Dinizio, Jr. P.O. Box 1179 h Lydia A. Tortora 0 Southold, New York 11971 (DLora S. Collins ZBA Fax (516) 765-9064 ge Hornin g Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Corr FINDINGS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF JULY 28, 1999 Appl. No. 4708 - LIEB CELLARS 1000-121-6-1 STREET & LOCALITY: 35 Cox Neck Lane and Middle Road (C.R. 48, a/k/a North Road), Mattituck DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: July 22, 1999 FINDINGS OF FACT PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's property is located in the Limited Business (LB) Zone District and consists of 3.563 acres (155,204.28 sq. ft. in area) with 337.83 ft. frontage along the north side of Middle Road (a/k/a Middle Road and C.R. 48), and 428.85 ft. frontage along the west side of Cox Neck Road, Mattituck. The property is vacant land. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's May 7, 1999 Notice of Disapproval citing Article VIII, Section 100-83C of the Zoning Code, stating that: "...the proposed construction on comer lot has two road frontages, two (2) structures on proposed project will exceed sixty (60) foot linear frontage on one of those road frontages while maintaining the required frontage on the other frontage." INTERPRETATION REQUESTED: Applicant's attorney asked the Board to rule that Section 100- 83C applies to frontage on "one (1) street"; in that case, since the building sides fronting Route 48 are within the 60-foot limit of Section 100-83C, the buildings would be in compliance. The Board agreed to hear this interpretation question and, after giving public notice, did so on July 22, 1999. Specifically, the Board addressed the question "whether the proposed winery building is required to have sixty (60) linear feet of frontage on one (1) street or on two road frontages." The legal notice read for the hearing held on July 22, 1999 was advertised as follows: "This is a request for an Interpretation under Article VIII, Section 100-83C which states: A project shall be divided into separate structures so that no single structure shall have more than sixty (60) linear feet of frontage on one (1) street. Applicant proposes to construct a winery on this corner lot with two road frontages (at intersection with Middle Road a/k/a C.R. 48) and requests the Board to interpret whether or not the proposed winery building is required to have sixty (60) linear feet of frontage on one (1) street or on two road frontages, as determined by the Building Department's May 7, 1999 Notice of Disapproval. Site Address: 35 Cox Neck Lane, Mattituck; Parcel 1000-121- 6-1." Page 2 - July 4999 ZMApplAo.47'08 - Lie0ellars Parcel 1000-121-6-1 BOARD ACTION/RESOLUTION: The Board heard testimony on the question to be addressed. The Board is cognizant of the legal principle that since zoning ordinances are in derogation of common law property rights, they must be construed strictly. On motion by Member Collins, seconded by Member Dinizio, it was RESOLVED, that the Board interprets the meaning of Section 100-83C to be that a structure shall have no more than sixty linear feet of frontage on one street, so that a structure with two street frontages satisfies Section 100-83C when it measures no more than 60 linear feet on one of those frontages; and further RESOLVED, that the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval dated May 7, 1999 is hereby reversed pursuant to this Board's authority under section 267-bi of New York Town Law. VOTE OF THE BOARD: AYES: MEMBERS GOEHRINGER, DINIZIO, TORTORA, AND COLLINS. (Absent was Member Horning of Fishers Island.) a lution opted (4-0). c GERARD P. G RINGER CHAIRMAN For Filing about 8/2/99 RECEIVED AND FILED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK DATE g~Z~S7SH Tttt pjtowR 17 Town Clerk, Town of Southold PLANNING BOARD MEMBO gpFFO(kc O Town Hall, 55095 Main Road BENNEI"f ORLOWSffi. JR. Gy P.O. Box 1179 Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS Southold, New York 11971 w Z KENNETH L. EDWARDS Fax (516) 765-3136 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. Telephone (516) 765.1938. RICHARD G. WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Board of Appeals FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman RE: Appl. No. 4698 William Lieblein/Port of Egypt Appl. No. 4708 Mark Lieb Appl. No. 4660 Empire Gas Station DATE: June 10, 1999 Appl. No. 4698 William Lieblein/Port of Egypt The Planning Board is in favor of this Project. The Board considers the natural vegetation on the site to be part of the required 20% landscaped area and thus meets the requirements for the 20% landscaping. If the Zoning Board grants the variance for the creation of a non-conforming lot from the two existing smaller non-conforming lots the Planning Board will recognize the lot created by this variance. Appl. No. 4708 Mark Lieb The Planning Board is not in favor of granting this building width variance. The Board supported the code change to a maximum of sixty feet in width for buildings in the Limited Business zone. To grant this variance would establish an unacceptable percent. Appl. No. 4660 Empire Service Station The Planning Board is in favor of this application. P6 ' PIK , ,sov~s REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN DETERMINATION Name bg~2 Address ~_-JiC p• N~ Phone 7 - f.~7_ Location of project Owner/Leasee ? Owners name Tax Map # 1000- Zone, Lot Size J)- Proposed Use List any accessory uses Existing Use ( if applicable) Y8C61, Proposed # of Parking Spaces Is there a current site plan on file ? no Health Dept approval? Please provide current survey if available. OFFICE USE ONLY Building Dept Comments: Pja-, n•. ~ e3a~ (1~r neraiunea JCt~1 ~ v~vL A, Initial Planning Comments: D INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT Southold Town Planninn Rnard Soo 3l, ~4 s ~s • 50 A 800 /U. S 5 cis r. j~v~ ron gsTIY~ ~Zm ~o S • s a 5~ " -F ;i~ V,• tilt % N 1 1 \\QI R.~6 i \\1t Y ,1 ~t , \ arm e.'41 a X§.. / '~t`~t\t`~;\\`+ a~ ` ,\~~~t '~"\~\`\a• :it\`, 1 `\`•a c,~,w~~y~,~n~'~ppy~,'. "NN f, vim. ~ 1 140i X e. / • 11 vi fI e / ::0 ' ! ~ • tit,, ~ CSI vol 4VI 43 PLAN STATUS REPORT SITE PLAN TYPE: AMENDEb -)C NEW WITHDRAWN INCOMPLETE PROJECT NAME: ZONEI:tS ZONE2: Zo E3: LOCATION: HAMLET: ,A,,CSCTM# 1000 - 121 6 / OWNER NAME: < J~ TEL# APPLICANTNAME: lQurse/ ~X![~.1 TEL#(_)= TEL# AGENT NAME: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: EXISTING USE: PROPOSED USE: DATE BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICE: S/P REQUIRED Y OR N ZBA APPEAL REQUIRE R N/ PRE-SUBMISSION CONFERENCE (WITHIN 30 DAYS OF WRITTEN REQUEST) NOTES: INFORMAL REQUEST FOR REVISIONS: APPLICATION RECEIVED DATE: !o /6 APPLICATION PROCESS DATE: /6 O ~l3/l cur PAYMENT RECEIVED: /Q161C)S AMOUNT RECEIVED:$ 788- 3L NEW SP: $500./ACRE &.10/SF, AMENDED SP: $250. +.I O/SF, AGRIC SP: FLAT $500 FEE AMOUNT: 2 )+(S.10 X S SF=$ 3 NEW APPLICATION WORK SESSION (WITHIN 10 DAYS OF RECEIPT), PB ACCEPTED(O)R N Ll3/ l Qs APPLICANT ADVISED OF NECESSARY REVISIONS (WITHIN 30 DAYS OF REVIEW) BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEEETING 100-254B3 (WITHIN 30 DAYS) /,4/s/A< ~Car..J s7.1 sCO,$~- !3~ /L / S / Cs NOTES: i(1,5Si G I.aX S 141 /al-<--- REVISED SUBMISSION RECEIVED : / S. o SCDPuJ 6Cf~ _!_l NOTES: REFERRED AGENCIES: (WITH MAPS=W/P) STZBA~STBD ?TC/TB JH STBTV/ ,STE?.SCDHS !NYSDEC_,USACORPS_,NYSDOT_, SC'WA ? , SC'PDtl~!-, SCDPW OZ, LWRP_ RESPONSES NOTES LEAD AGENCY: TOSPB:_, OTHER:_ REVIEW: PARTI_, PART 2 , PART 3, SHORT EAF_, LONG EAF_ NOTES: ACTION TYPE: COORDINATED:- UNCOORDINATED:- (TYPE1:_ TYPE2:_UNLISTED: ) REFERRED TO: STZBASTBDSTC/IBJHSTBTSTESCDHSNYSDECUSACORPSNYSDOTSCWA_, SCPDSCDPW_ SEQRA DETERMINATION :NEG DEC Y OR N, APPROVALS REQUIRED: REFERRED DATE NOTES APPROVAL DATE NOTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE: OLl' lOS lLl ",be( LWRP COORDINATOR: 0611~l/r % Al /of /pS Iq_/Lj/_Cs (CCUYAr a. wA tP r a-1 0 ~c S BUILDING DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATION: JS/ 4/5 1L/ I 3-lam! - ' I ILK ,55aC,, j, FIRE COMMISSIONERS: V /tA /e, 1(26, TOWN ENGINEER APPROVAL: 16111 tlS -.~[`•J3- DEP.OFTRANSPORTATION: DOT-, DPW_~/, TOS ! l ~i yp o3-/tcc - s / r SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING : 1~ 1L/gam// - SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT OF HEALTH : PERMIT •~Z. " OPTIONAL APPROVALS: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: APPEALM BOARD OF TRUSTEE'S: NYS DEC WETLANDS/TIDAUSPOES ! / / ! PLANNING BOARD DECISIONS: CONDITIONAL FINAL: _I_/_ DENIED: APPROVED: FINAL: NOTES ENDORSEMENT OF SITE PLAN: FIELD INSPECTION FOR C/O: DISTRIBUTE APPROVED SITE PLANS TO: BUILDING DEPT TOWN ENG GENERAL NOTES: i/ / O < s...-rte n1 t Y o res i sµ < '11~ 14A-1- 1 7 Q(:.- L /fir U 7a:`~; - e -a. N6 4 - 4144:67t ~j 10/4/2005 i ~IhllAll ;I ~Qco~ L~v~/od /c~iera/~an~ c~~/h~ • A~i C~~r T•ora/~ AREIf CA/ Alak yW 5-1 V / 3) 4R~J//,nA~ ~A~~ - /w 6f~/Loh,6-*•~ Vim/ COX ~`°~~F /`~Y- l.R-~fZ~of lYi/o R 1 £u.tr ~~°'ilyy N tii lV'!~/ h ~•.fn-f%' H ~'p ~ ~I ~i I TOWOF SOUTHOLD PLANNIlS BOARD SITE PLAN APPLICATION SECTION A: Site Plan Name and Location Application Date: 9 / 30 / 05 Site Plan Name: Premium Wine Group Suffolk County Tax Map #1000- 121 _ 6 1 ^ 5 Other SCTM #s: Street Address: 35 Cox NPrk Rd Hamlet: Distance to nearest intersection: Type of Site Plan: X New Amend Residential If Amended, last approval d / / SECTION B: Owners/Agent Contact Information Please list name, mailing address, and hone number or the people below: Property Owner Premium Wine Holding LLC Street 35 Cox Neck Rd. City Mattituck State NY Zip 11952 Home Telephone Other 298-1900 Applicant Russell Hearn Street 35 Cox Neck Rd. City Mattituck State NY Zip 11952 Home Telephone Other 298-1900 Applicant's Agent or Representative: ContactPerson(s)* Nanc Steelman Street 25235 Main Rd. City Cutchogue State NY Zip 11935 Office Telephone 734-6405 Other *Unless otherwise requested, correspondence will be sent only to the contact person noted here. Page 2 of 3 SECTION C: Site Data . Proposed construction type: New XModification of Existing Structure Agricultural Change of use Property total acreage or square footage: ac /sq. ft. Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage: 25 , 969 ac./ q. ft. Is there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes No x If yes, explain: Property Zoning District(s): LB Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: g / 9 /Q5 Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes x No If yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes x No If yes, attach a copy of the application packet. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more then one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. List all existing property uses: Winery List all proposed property uses: Winery Other accessory uses: Existing lot coverage: 13 % Proposed lot coverage: 16. 7 % Gross floor area of existing structure(s): 2 o , 5 a 5 sq. ft. Gross floor area of proposed structurc(s):9 . 3 g 4 Parking Space Data: # of existing spaces: 49 # of proposed spaces: 21 Loading Berth: Yes x No Landbanked Landscaping Details: Existing landscape coverage: 56 % Proposed landscape coverage: 52.64 % Waterfront Data: Is this property within 500" of a wetland area? Yes No X_ If yes explain: I, the undersigned, certi h all the abo e info lion is true. Signature of Prepare r. Date: p Page 3 of 3 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: R Part 1 El Part 2 Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.` C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. •A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Premium Wine Group Name of Action Town of Southold Name of Lead Agency Jerilyn Woodhouse Chairperson Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer / Signat re of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature f Pr ar (I ferent from responsible officer) 10 April 2006 website Date Page 1 of 21 PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) ! In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. I The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific projector site other examples and/or lower thresholds maybe appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. ! In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. C. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot © M Yes [:]No rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table © © ? Yes E ]No is less than 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more © ? Yes E ]No vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or D Yes ©No generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or © © Yes QNo involve more than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove © Yes 0 No more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. Page 11 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. ? ? ?Yes ? No • Construction in a designated floodway. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No 2. Will there bean effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) ONO ?YES • Specific land forms: ? ? ?Yes ?No Impact on Water 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) [F] NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ? © © ? • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. Yes No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of © ? ? Yes ? No a protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water ? ? ? Yes ? No body. • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ? ? ? Yes ? No • Other impacts: ? ? ? Yes ? No 4. Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ? NO ©YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of ? ? ? Yes ? No water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface © © ? Yes ? No area. • Other impacts: ? ? ? Yes ? No Page 12 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? IE NO ©YES Examples that would apply to column 2 © © © ? • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. Yes No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ? ? ? Yes ? No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater ? ? ? Yes ? No than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water © ? ? Yes ? No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ? ? ? Yes ? No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which ? ? ? Yes ? No presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons ? ? ? Yes ? No per day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into ? ? ? Yes ? No an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or ? ? ? Yes ? No chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without ? ? ? Yes ? No water and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses ? ? ? Yes ? No which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No Page 13 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 6. Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ?NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated ? ? ?Yes ?No floodway. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will Proposed Action affect air quality? ?NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any ? ? ?Yes ?No given hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton ? ? ? Yes ? No of refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour ? ? ?Yes ? No or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land ? ? ?Yes ? No committed to industrial use. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of ? ? ?Yes ? No industrial development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ?NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ? © 0 Yes • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Yes No Federal list, using the site, over or near the site, or found on the site. Page 14 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ? ? ? Yes ? No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, ? ? ? Yes ?No other than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? ?NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident ? ? ? Yes ? No or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of ? ? ? Yes ? No mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ? NO ? YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The Proposed Action would sever, cross or limit access to ? ? ? Yes ? No agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ? ? ? Yes ? No agricultural land. • The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 ? ? ? Yes ? No acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. Page 15 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of ? ? ? Yes ? No agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). • Other impacts: ? ? ? Yes ? No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) El NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different ? ? ? Yes ? No from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ? ? ? Yes ? No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or ? ? ? Yes ? No significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? ?NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or ? ? ? Yes ? No substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within ? ? ? Yes ? No the project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive ? ? ? Yes ? No for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Page 16 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Other impacts: ? ? ? Yes ? No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Fol NO ? YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ? ? ? Yes ? No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ? ? ? Yes ? No • Other impacts: ? © ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? ?NO ?YES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? ? ? ? Yes ?No • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the ? ? ? Yes ?No resource? • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the ? ? ? Yes ?No resource? • Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the ? ? ? Yes ? No resource? • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No Page 17 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ? NO ? YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or ? ? ?Yes ? No goods. • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ? ? ? Yes ? No • Other impacts: ? ? ? Yes ? No IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ?NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the ? ? ?Yes ? No use of any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an ? ? ? Yes © No energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? r7m NO [:]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ? ? ? Yes ? No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ? ? ? Yes ? No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the ? © ? Yes ? No local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ? ? ?Yes ? No noise screen. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No I I Page 18 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? FE I NO ?YES • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of ? ? ?Yes ? No hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" ? ? ?Yes ? No in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied ? ? ?Yes ? No natural gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other ? ? ?Yes ? No disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? rul NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ? ? ?Yes ?No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating ? ? ?Yes ? No services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or ? ? ?Yes ? No goals. • Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, ? ? ?Yes ? No structures or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community ? ? ?Yes ?No services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) Page 19 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future ? ? ? Yes ? No projects. • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ? ? ? Yes ? No • Other impacts: ? ? ? Yes ? No 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? M- NO ?YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 APPLICANTS AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Russell Hearn being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at 35 Cc~x Neck Rij0.4 a( NY 11 x 52 In the State of New York, and that he Is the owner of the above property, or that he is the Partner of the Pp-m;nm Ili n uni rigs rrr (Title) (specify whether Partnership or Corp.) which is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or Improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the title to the entire parcel, Including all rights-of-way, has been clearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans n and will h comply examined w th sa l me; rules that the / as to lots and as to roads; that he plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed In any manner without the approval of the J Planning Board; and that the actual physical improvements will be installed in strict accordance With the plans submitted. Signed (o er Signed n fV1ft1~1R NEr PRfTNEf~ (Part or or Corporate Officer and Title) Sworn to me this ~"l 1.9-- day of 3 qc) (Notary Public) PATRICIA RICHARDS Notary Public, State of New York No. 01R16042467 Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Expires May 30, 2002' C)(D PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Addition Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) Premium Wine Group 35 Cox Neck Rd. Mattituck, NY Suffolk Name of Applicant/Sponsor -Russell 8earn Address 35 Cox Neck Rd City/PO Mattituck State NY Zip Code 11952 Business Telephone 631-298-1900 Name of Owner (if different) -Premium Wine Hot di ng L•L•C Address 35 Cox Neck Rd. City/PO Mattituck State NY Zip Code 11952 Business Telephone 298-1900 Description of Action: Construction of a new addition linking the existing two buildings. Page 2 of 21 • • Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1 . Present Land Use: ? Urban ? Industrial ? Commercial ? Residential (suburban) ? Rural (non-farm) Forest Cl Agriculture ? Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 3 - 56 nacres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces I. 568acres 1.688 acres Other (Indicate type) Landscaped 1 . 995acres 1 . 875 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: ? Well drained 100% of site ? Moderately well drained of site. ?Poorly drained of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ? Yes ? No a. What is depth to bedrock N . A . (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ? 0-10% 100% ?10- 15%_% ? 15% or greater_% 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? Yes ? No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ? Yes 12No a. What is the depth of the water table? 35(in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ?Yes ? No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ? Yes ? No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ?Yes ®No According to: Identify each species: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? ?Yes ? No Describe: 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ? Yes ®No If es, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ©Yes ®No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N.A. a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary N.A. - 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: N.A. b. Size (in acres): N.A. Page 4 of 21 • 0 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? El Yes R No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ® Yes ® No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? rl Yes E]No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ©Yes M No 19. Is the site located in or substantial) contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ?Yes LANo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? FI Yes F,1No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 3 .563 acres, b. Project acreage to be developed: 0 • 12 acres initially; 1 . 688 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 1 . 8 7 5 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: a 7. r: * (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. 7.6% f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 49 proposed 21 ( landbanked ) g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per houN. A. (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: N.A. One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately I. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: height: width; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed ®Yes ®No El N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? M Yes F1 No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Yes El No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 1 9 acres. Page 5 of 21 • • 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? E]Yes O No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: 6 months. (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: N.A. a. Total number of phases anticipated (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: month year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? © Yes ® No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? E ]Yes ® No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction N • A after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ElYes C] No If yes, explain: N.A. 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ® Yes E]No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? E ]Yes ®No Type Tank washdown wastewater 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? MYes ©No If yes, explain: N.A. 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? © Yes ®No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ® Yes ® No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? FlYes F1 No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? MYes E]No Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ©Yes ®No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ©Yes XX No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ©Yes ®No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ® Yes ®No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? a Yes M No If yes, indicate type(s) Fuel oil - heating Electric - lighting 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N • A • gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 0 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? n Yes EINo If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board ® Yes ® No City, Town, Village Planning Board E] Yes ®No Site Plan 10/4/05 approval City, Town Zoning Board Q Yes 1:1 No Variance 9/22/05 Septic 10/4/05 City, County Health Department n Yes ? No Other Local Agencies FiYes ? No R" i 1 di n 4 Pp rtn i t N. A. Other Regional Agencies ® Yes No State Agencies Yes No Federal Agencies ? Yes ®No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ®Yes ® No If Yes, indicate decision required: Zoning amendment ® Zoning variance Q New/revision of master plan ? Subdivision r-71 Site plan ? Special use permit ® Resource management plan Other Page 8 of 21 0 • 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? L. B. 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 20% Lot coverage = 31,040 S.F. 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? Same 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? Same 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? E]Yes ®No 1- :1 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/4 mile radius of proposed action? LB - Limited Business AC - Agricultural Conservation R-80 - Residential Low Density A R -40 - Residential Low Density AA L-10 - Light Industrial/Office Park 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a 1/4 mile? x? Yes No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? n . a . a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ® Yes ® No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? E ]Yes IE No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ® Yes O No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? n Yes)o No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. ®Yes 1:1 No I D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above its true to the best of my knowledge. / Applicant/Sponsor Name RUSSELL y~'2N (1NITNp'CT'INFr PAQ.T~fl Date _ 10/S/US Signature Title IyI PgV kM fJ6- PprRTWt)Z If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 r Town,of Southold • Y ` ' LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its si ign ficant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town)3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail listing both supporting and non supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# ( 04 - 9l PROJECT NAME _h 1l l) VY1 It"1C' (~Yd~t7 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board 0 Planning Board Building Dept. 13 Board of Trustees 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) 0 (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: IZ kLS Nature and extent of action: O I I Qn D Z) g2n L Location of action:_ Site acreage: 3.562S Ae~m.5 Present land use: 10i Present zoning classification: 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: R060W-1 I7 nm- A?J!~Jium / (b) Mailing address: 33~ j~ ~6Zr I!36 Z (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( ) l~~j/ - 29B - / 900 (d) Application number, if any: 5d?-, Bab Appi-bval rjyjl j ^d~~hj~~s Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or ~approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ? No '45XJJ If yes, which state or federal agency? C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ? Yes ? No X Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ? Yes ? No 0 Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Yes E No Ed Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies sPPages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria 0 Yes 1E No)& Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria Yes M No XNot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes 0 No r'~Q Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ? Yes ? No" Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary 1 Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ? Yes ? No jrX01 Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ? Yes ? Nox Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's wa-dependent uses and promote siti*f new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ? Yes ? No M Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ? Yes ? No leTZ]kNot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ? Yes ? No M Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ? Yes ? No 19 Not Applicable PREPARED B TITLE ~yY~ ~T DATE Amended on 811105 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION Premium Wine Group, LLC 35 Cox Neck Road Mattituck, NY 11952 631 298-1900 August 26, 2005 I hereby authorize Nancy Steelman of SAMUELS & STEELMAN ARCHITECTS to act as our agent in obtaining all permits required bySOUTHOLD TOWN, SUFFOLK COUNTY and NEW YORK STATE for the Renovations & Additions to Premium Wine Group facility. Aw- (hrtuA6-tN6- l2WTWEYC $ /3 C) /o S R ssell Hearn Title Date For Office Use Only Fee: $Filed By: Date Assigned/Assignment No. Office Notes: APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS Parcel Location: House No.j;Street -;Cox Neck Rd. Hamlet Mattituck SCTM 1000 Section_ Z_1 Size -i _ 5 F 3 Zone District r,n I (WE) APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED: Owner as Applicant: pram; „m wine r-rn„py r r r Mailing Address: 35 Cox Neck Rd. Math; turrk NY 1 l Q59 Telephone: 631-298-1900 Fax: NOTES If applicant h. not the owner, state If applicant Is owner's attorney, anent, architect, builder, contract vendee, etc. Authorized Representative: Nancy Steelman, am,e1S & Steelman Architects Address: 25235 Main Rd.. Cutchogue, NY 11935 Telephone: 631-734-6405 Fax: 631-734-6407 Please specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to, from the above listed names: ? Applicant/Owner(s) V Authorized Representative ? Other: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED 7/11/05 FOR: ® Building Permit ? Certificate of Occupancy ? Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ? Change of Use ? Permit for As-Built Construction Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. Indicate Article, Section, Subsection and paragraph of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code. Article X Section 100-$3 r Subsection Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: :0 A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ? A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. ? Interpretation of the Town Code, Article Section ? Reversal or Other A prior appeal 0 hasp has not been made with respect to this property UNDER Appeal No. -Year REASONS FOR APPEAL (additional sheets may be used with applicant's sienature): AREA VARL4NCERE4S0NS: ( See Attached Sheet) (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties if granted, because: (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: (5) Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? 00Yes, or ( )No. This is the MINDIUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the community. Check this box DT A USE VARIANCE IS BEING REQWD MPI.ETE THE ATTACHED USE VARIANCE SHEET: (Pleere be run to cotnuk your attorney.) ant or Authord ent n Authorbiaaon prom Omer) Sworn to before me this day of~ut'I'36 .200_'~-. otaty Pubpc PATRICIA RICHARDS Notary Public, State of New York No. 01R16042467 Oualified In Suffolk County Commission Expires May 30, 20W 6 (_a APPLICANT TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of Town officers and employees The pose of this form is to provide information which can alert the Town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same YOURNAME: Nancy Steelman (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person or company name.) NATURE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax Grievance Variance X Change of Zone Approval of Plat Exemption from Plat or Official Map Other If "Other", name the activity: Do you personally, (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. `Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the Town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the Town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO X If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold: Title or position of that person: Describe that relationship between yourself (the applicant) and the Town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A through D (below) and/or describe the relationship in the space provided. The Town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply): A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitt*d2 d of Signatur Print Na PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Please include with Z.B.A. Application) Applicant(s): Premium win* Group, LLC 1. If building is existing and alterations/additions/renovations are proposed: A. Please give the dimensions of new extensions beyond existing footprint of building. Dimensions of fast floor extension: 601 x 871 Dimensions of second floor: 60, x 67, Dimensions of floor above second level: Height (from ground to top of ridge): 29' B. Please give the dimensions and square footage of new construction over existing footprint or over fast floor or basement areas: Dimensions of first floor: N/A Dimensions of second floor: Dimensions of floor above second level: Height (from ground to top of ridge): Square footage for first floor: second floor: II. If land is vacant: Please give dimensions and overall lot coverage percentage and square footage of new construction for each floor: Dimensions of first floor: Dimensions of second floor: Dimensions of floor above second level: Height (from ground to top of ridge): III. Purpose and use of new construction requested in this application: w i n a r Y (G II »n o r t spaces t0 A® RnEtling Tina Prarlnrl•inn Draa^ conference Room & Offices) IV. Additional information about the surrounding contours or nearby buildings that relate to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): None V. Please submit seven (7) photos, labeled to show area of proposed construction or existing yard areas for which variance relief is requested (after staking comers for new construction). Please note: Further changes, after submitting the abovd information, must be placed in writing and may require a new Notice of Disapproval to show changes to the initial plans. If additional time is needed, please contact our office, or please check with Building Department (765-1802) or Appeals Department (765-1809) ff you are not sure. Thank>vu. 7/02; 2/05 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WrM YOUR Z.B.A. APPLICATION A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? ? Yes MNo B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? ? Yes aNo C. 1) Are there any areas that contain wetland grasses? No 2) Are the wetland areas shown on the map submitted with this application? N/A 3) Is the property bulkheaded between the wetlands area and the upland building area? N/A 4) If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the office of the Town Trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees: N/A D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? N/A E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist and are not shown on the survey map that you are submitting? No (Please show area of these structures on a diagram if any exist. Or state "none" on the above line, if applicable.) F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? Nn If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and map as approved by the Building Department and describe: G. Do you or any co-owner also own other land close to this parcel? Nn If yes, please label the proximity of your lands on your map with this application. H. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel Winery and proposed use _ Winery ples: exis ' single- amily; proposed: same with garage.) rued 9 afore and Date 2i05 PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Please include with Z.B.A. Application) Applicant(s): Premium Wing Group, LLC I. If building is existing and alterations/additions/renovations are proposed: A. Please give the dimensions of new extensions beyond existing footprint of building: Dimensions of first floor extension: 601 x 871 Dimensions of second floor: 601 x 671 Dimensions of floor above second level: Height (from ground to top of ridge): 29, B. Please give the dimensions and square footage of new construction over existing footprint or over first floor or basement areas: Dimensions of first floor: N/A Dimensions of second floor: Dimensions of floor above second level: Height (from ground to top of ridge): Square footage for first floor: second floor: II. If land is vacant: Please give dimensions and overall lot coverage percentage and square footage of new construction for each floor: Dimensions of first floor: Dimensions of second floor: Dimensions of floor above second level: Height (from ground to top of ridge): III. Purpose and use of now construction requested in this application: w i n p r y (c a ppn r t spaces to include a^*.tr ;ng r.;np Prnellintion A pas. conference Room & Offices) IV. Additional information about the surrounding contours or nearby buildings that relate to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): None V. Please submit seven (7) photos, labeled to show area of proposed construction or existing yard areas for which variance relief is requested (after staking comers for new construction). Please note: Further changes, after submitting the above information, must be placed in writing and may require a new Notice of Disapproval to show changes to the initial plans. If additional time is needeg please contact our q f Pce, or please check with Building Department (765-1802) or Appeals Department (765-1809) ifyou are not sure. 7hank3vu. 7/02; 2105 r ,y _ ~ ~ ~r ~ 9 ~r-r. _ ~'1~.+ _ i ' r;_ r ~ , . f tip' ~ ?w;nt rk~..'irt! 1{i' T a s ~ ~ r ~ .y.. ~i ~J. W r ~ • • Premium Wine Group Area Variance Reasons 1. An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties if granted, because: The Premium Wine Group Facility currently consists of two 60' wide buildings facing County Road 48 with 60' between the two buildings. These buildings were originally built to conform to the Limited Business Zone's maximum building width restriction of 60 feet. As the business has grown, it has become apparent that additional space is needed and that having two separate buildings has become inefficient for a functioning winery. The proposed Addition links the two building together with additional support and production areas for the winery. This Addition will solve their spacial needs and will provide for enclosed circulation between the two buildings. The surrounding neighborhood currently consists of a strip shopping mall, landscape business, and a residence to the east; a fence company, drainage and excavation business to the south across C.R. 48; a plant nursery to the north and west. The strip shopping mall is approximately 150' long facing the road and the fence company building is 100'. These buildings both exceed the 60' width. The total length of 180' is not substantially different than the surrounding buildings and will not produce an undesirable change to the neighborhood. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other that an area variance, because: To gain additional square footage for the winery, the existing buildings could be added to in the north/south axis and increase the overall length of each of the buildings. But it would not solve a more fundamental problem of not having enclosed internal circulation between both buildings. For the winery to function as a whole, linking the two building is critical. 3. The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: The overall length of the new Addition of 60' is required to link the two existing buildings. The depth of the new addition will not effect the overall length of the link and the bulk of the addition to the north will not be seen from any direction. 4. The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: The proposed project is an addition to two existing buildings which were constructed 5 years ago. There will not be any additional impact on the environment due to this addition. FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL Date: August 9, 2005 TO: Samuels & Steelman A/C Premium Wine Group 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Please take notice that your application dated July 12, 2005 For permit to make additions and alterations connecting two existing buildings at Location of property: 35 Cox Neck Road, Mattituck, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 121 Block 6 Lot .1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction on property located in the LB District is not permitted pursuant to Article X. Section 100-83C., which states, "A project shall be divided into separate structures so that no single structure shall have more than sixty (60) linear feet of frontage on one (1) street." The total linear frontage, following the proposed construction, will be 180 linear feet. hi addition-if variance is anted site lan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board will be re ui 1 u rite igna e Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, following any ZBA decision, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A. i U VV 11 yr OUU:1riULt1C" - - ~ BUILDIN -KNIT APPLICATION CHECKLIS'1 BUILDING DEPART ti qt$ TOWN HALL Do y , -cave or need the following, before applying`. SOUTHOLD NY 1197 r; j l + Board of Health (r JUL 12 2005 3 sets of Building Plans TEL: (631) 765-1802 Planning Board approval FAX: (631) 765-9502 N Da-e... Survey, www. northforLuet/So ND--j Check Septic Form N.Y.S.D.E.C. Examined 20 Trustees Contact: Approved 2 Mail to: Disapproved a/c- Phone: Expiration 20 g Inspe APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT INSTRUCTIONS Date 20_g2.1~ a. This application MUST be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 3 f ets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and waterways. c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Certificate of Occupancy. f, Every building permit shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date. If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property have been enacted in the interim, the Building Inspector may authorize, in writing, the extension of the permit for an addition six months. Thereafter, a new permit shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the 3uilding Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or tegulations, for the construction of buildings, additions, or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described. The fpplieant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, building code, ho ing cod , d regulations, and to admit uthorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. ature of applicantbr tame, if a corporation) (Mailing ad ss of applican late whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder ame of owner of premises rvr i r )rn 1i M CArib l l r (As on the tax ro I or latest deed) applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer (Name and title of corporate officer) iilders License No. umbers License No. ectricians License No. her Trade's License No. Location of land on which proposed work will be done: 35 l e~ _14/~~~ ke4 House Number Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section ' % " ' Block (o LotO` Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot (Name) a1U State existing use and occupancy of pre01, s and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy x= ru b. Intended use and occupancy W1 n2 k- W Nature of work (check which applicable): New Buil mg Addition__)~_Alteration Repair Removal Demolition Other Work Estimated Cost 7~/;, /~pp, 6en', Fee (Description) (To be paid on filing this application) If dwelling, number of dwelling units - Number of dwelling units on each floor If garage, number of cars If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use. Oinc--Nj S~¢ <.A& • Dimensions of existin§ structures, if any: Front Rear Depth Height 29 -8 Number of Stories / Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories 2. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front - Rear - Depth Height _ Number of Stories - Size of lot: Front P/4h 'Rear Depth .Date of Purchase Z °T 9 9. Name of Former Owner rte irks Zone or use district in which premises are situated LL-22 Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? YES NO Will lot be re-graded? YES_ NO,,~(__Will excess fill be removed from premises? YES_ NO~ Names of Owner of premises nom. r ddress Phone' No Name of Architect , rn n Is Addres - Phone No - Name of Contractor Address °1`A one No. i. Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES NW< IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES & D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED, y. Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? * YES N0-"1 F YES, D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. Provide survey, to scale, with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. If elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below, must provide topographical data on survey. XE OF NEW YORK) SS! yy~ , OFS~T~~J(^^9rGGGG~-) JNTY I~6 n '~,y O l I'l'1aA being duly sworn, doposcs and says "V(s)he is the. applicant (Name o individual signing contract) above named, .e is the Contractor, Agent, Corpsrate.Otticer, etc.) - id owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application; dl statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief, and that the work will be rcmed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. n to before me thi3 ' Z- day of y~ 20P-1Z Notary Public ature of Applicant PA?1l1CA RICHARDS . NotarY.Publie, Slatq of New Yorke No. OI S IS042467 oualifled in Suffolk County „ I _ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD OWNER STREET VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT Premium ACR. REMARKS I TYPE OF BLD' PROP. C ~S t + LAND IMP.' TOTAL DATE BOAaor~ 3 40 - - ~Q $ O in / o~ Qa o00 4' o00 0/" / ~v ?od. s m 3r oo - n LA #!3er4 BL Jt~n f P 9. 5- C'oUr}'UiC~Q? ~ 29 oz o - ai- 0 G S- 0U, I c FRONTAGE ON WATER TILLABLE - oz "I I FRONT GE N O WOODLAND DEPTH r + r= MEADOWLAND BULKHEAD HOUSE/LOT Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 • Southold, NY 11971 ***RECEIPT*** Date: 11/02/05 Receipt#: 12556 Transaction(s): Reference Subtotal 1 1 Application Fees 121-6-1 $788.00 Check#: 12556 Total Paid: $788.00 Name: Premium, Wine Group Llc P. O. Box 907 Mattituck, NY 11952 Clerk ID: LINDAC Intemal ID: 121-6-1 • • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~r4f soU~ P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Southold, NY 11971 Chair ti p OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS G Q 54375 State Route 25 MARTIN H. SIDOR %0 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) GEORGE D. SOLOMON lij'COl' M Southold, NY V 111, Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk From: Planning Department Date: November 1, 2005 Re: Checks Enclosed herewith are the checks listed below. Please return a receipt to us. Thank you. Project Name & Type Tax Map # Amount Date of Check 1 00 Main Rd. SP 114-11-17 $1,134.80 app 10/11/05 remium Wine Group SP 121-6-1 $788 app 9/30/05 Kam rounds SP 40-3-5 $250 application 10/31/05 LR encs. EXISTING SCREENING 45 45 N 02 15" 10" w' EVERGREEN TREES 40000 74 SITE DATA f"L PROPS , 35 COX 1-06-01 PARKING C RKING CALCULATIONS T/ / PROPERTY: 35 COX NECK ROAD EXIST. STORAGE T. STORAGE BUILDING: 9906sf/1000 9.9 spaces Z ADRESS MATfITUCK, NY 17952 EXIST. OFFICE SP T. OFFICE SPACE: 320 sf/100 3.2 spaces EXI9.TINS- OWNER: PREMIUM WINE GROUP, LLC EXIST. PRODUCTL T. PRODUCTION: 6,992 sf/500 13.98 spaces 48\ DUNA'STER ZONING: LB EXIST. TASTING R T. TASTING ROOM: 738 sf/150 4.92 spaces O FT SIDE YARD SETBACK LINE o ofTl~ SITE: 155,204.28 SO. FT. = 3.563 ACRES EX EXIST. TOTAL REQUIRED 32 spaces ~j BUILDING: EXISTING: 20,585 SF PROPOSED PROC m / AREA PROPOSED:5,384 SF PROPOSED OFFIC POSED PRODUCTION AREA: 4216sf/500 8.43 spaces T/ D POSED OFFICE AREA: 2803 sf/100 28.03 spaces ' y LOT EXISTING: 13% PROPOSED MEZZ COVERAGE PROPOSED: 16.7% PROPOSED MECF POSED MEZZ. STORAGE 827 sf/1000 .82spaces D--EX ISTINS EX15T1 / TREES / i ALLOWABLE: 20% POSED MECH. STORAGE: 530 sf/1000 _.53 spaces LANDSCAPED EXISTING: 56% PROPOSE PROPOSED TOTAL REQUIRED: 37.81 spaces 0. b AREA PROPOSED: 52.640/6 TOTAL PA i TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 70 spaces i .9 NIy X REQUIRED: 350/9 TOTAL E)I I SURVEYOR: PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C. TOTAL NE TOTAL EXISTING PARKING 49 spaces 0 i 1230 TRAVELER STREET (LA TOTAL NEW PARKING 21 spaces (LAND BANKED) O SOUTHOLD NY 11971 LAWN iEX15TING LICENSE # 498 TREES TED MAY 15, 2001 y _ V DA W (n z $ ~d? SANITARY CALCI Y CALCULATIONS ZO T/ 5 ZY/ S .I I. 1. ALLOWABLE DENSI• TOTAL ACERAGE: 3 ABLE DENSITY 0 ACERAGE: 3.563 ACRES `y ~py HYDROGEOLOGICA )GEOLOGICAL ZONE: ZONE I, 'R I WATER SUPPLY: PL t SUPPLY: PUBLIC WATER' _ Q ALLOWABLE: 3.563 (ABLE: 3.563 Acres x 300 GP ,4 GPD. TOTAL SITE SEWAGI SITE SEWAGE DESIGN FLOM 1I, iy GPD. _ G "F EiXISTI II. SANITARY DESIGN RYDESIGN IqT o Q SEWAGE DESIGN FL E DESIGN FLOW: C~ EXI5TINS 51(SN WITH / b EXISTING WINERY NG WINERY (SYSTEM #1): Q 45 (2) EXISTINS UP \ LISHTS 1. TASTING ROOM iTING ROOM (0.10 GPD/SF) I Co A { 0.10 GPD r 0.10 GPD X 738 S.F.= 74 GPD \ / tS 1(.p \ 2. OFFICE SPACE Q :ICE SPACE (0.06 GPD/SF) EXISTING--_-~~ - ' 0.06 GPD X 0.06 GPD X 320 = 19 GPD_;'-=1' FLASPOLE ~ 3. WINE PRODUCTL IE PRODUCTION (0.04 GPD/SF)„ 155, 0.04GPDXi /s 4. STORAGE BUILD 0.04 GPD X 6,992 SF = 280 GP _ . r (RAGE BUILDING (0.04 GPD/SF _ Q t~ f 0.04 GPD X' 0.04 GPD X 10,408 SF = 417 GP.D - NEW AASTE HATER SYSTEM f s / EXISTING SEWAGE I 4G SEWAGE FLOW = 790 GPD O 0) 1,200 GAL SETTU3-MT TANK - Tb- PROPOSED ADDITIC iSED ADDITION TO EXISTING WINERY Z (5TL)(BFTPIAx5FTHT) ( O ~p 1. WINE PRODUCTI IE PRODUCTION (0.04 GPD/SF) N 8 FT PIA x 5 FT HT LEACHING $ ` 0.04 GPD X 0.04 GPD X 3,690 SF= 148 GPD W~/ Y POOL POOL (LP) \ g.~rYS II` 2. OFFICE SPACE (I 'ICE SPACE (0.06 GPD/SF) Ld. V 0.06 GPD X 1,353 SF = 81 GPD 0.06GPDX• EXI5TINCG SEPTIC, 5Y5TEM EXP $ 4~4% I i I s~ ~ 1 I ADDITIONAL SEWA( ONAL SEWAGE FLOW = 229 GPD \ h TOTAL SITE SEWAG SITE SEWAGE FLOW =1,019 GPD Q 0) 2,500 GAL SEPTIC TANK (5T) (EXISTING) (2) 10 FT. VIA,-X-12 FT. HT. LEACHING s SANITARY SYSTEM REI SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS W T/ +44.1 POLL (CP) (EXIkING) - 5 II ' if I(( SEPTIC SYSTEM -1,01 IYSTEM -1,019 GPD :-D (01 FT VIA x 12 Pr WT EXPANSION 1.SEPTIC TANK (ST IC TANK (ST): 1,019 GPD x 2 DAYS FLOW = 2,060 GAL USE MINIMUM: 2,5( IINIMUM: 2,500 GAL SEPTIC TANK (existing) a 2.LEACHING POOLS RING POOLS (LP): 1,019 / 1.5 S.F./GPD = 679.3 S.F. EXI ING / 44 ~ WIrH s~~ / 'C1 Nj USE MINIMUM (2 IINIMUM (2 -10 FT. DIA. X 12 FT. HT.) = 754 S.F. ,e?'( Q PLUS 50% EXPANS 50% EXPANSION (EXP): 1 -10 FT DIA x 12 FT HT TI Q 9v \ Ill. WASTE WATER PROCES. < ' FER PROCESSING 1`' NEW PRODUCTION ARE, UCTION AREA / • . , ~ G 1 `t./ WASH DOWN OF TA! )OWN OF TANKS 285 GPD ay Z 44 TOTAL PROCESSI 4L PROCESSING 285 GPD 1g WASTE WATER PROCES: 'ER PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS: W v fGx~g WASTE WATER SYSTEM TER SYSTEM - 285 GPD J 4 Q T/ +44.8 ; VINES 1.SETTLEMENTTANK:; KENT TANK: 285 GPD x 2 DAYS FLOW = 570 GAL o Q 'g EXI NO 1 - 1,200 GAL SETTL 10 GAL SETTLEMENT TANK (STL) (8 FT DIA x 5 FT HT) W -i :i . ' . TRESS 2.LEACHING POOLS 281 IG POOLS 285 GPD / 1.5 SF / GPD =190 SF 7 W • u W 'T DIA x 8 FT HT POOL (LP) = 200 SF i c Y ~y~{ USE 8 FT DIA x 6 FT I mow. "9 " ,443 LOCH f/1 fq• u S .OCATION MAP V / I U Jz \ \ V\~ / ?f\gS P Ar. Fc EXISTIN* TREES 0 EXISTING j am/ \ TRH'' / ) \ a e * o Id Sound \ gS V P1 Duna P Ave \ cgS \\~I +44.i 10 EXISTINS TREES \ g \N . P F `0 SITE d A +44.5 N G^ PROJECT NO: N 0508 ^ DRAWN BY: I ~AW~~ CHECKED BY: NS LAM EX XSIN~ TRMS tya C R P DATE: SEPTEMBER 29,2005 SCALE: 1"= 20'-0" e \ EX DI 1, TREES SHEET TnLE: H4.4 T/ .2 \ D j SITE PLAN L = 127.60' / O ~ V SHEET NO.: T/G+44B SITE PLAN SCALE: V= 20'-0" s P PLANNING/ SCHDS 45 N 02 13" 10" w EXISTINGBE SNCREENINGS ~ TR 46 T/ +451 44 SITED TA 400.00 SCTM# 1000-121-06.01 PARKING CALCULATIONS 1 ' PROPERTY: 35 COX NECK ROAD PA y ADRESS MATTITUCK, NY 11952 m OWNER: PREMIUM WINE GROUP, LLC EXI' EXIST. STORAGE BUILDING: 9906sf/1000 9.9 spaces EXIST. OFFICE SPACE: 320 sf/100 3.2 spaces 46 EKI5TIN6 . X • Q~ EXI, EXIST. PRODUCTION: 6,992 sf/500 13.98 spaces EXIST. TASTING ROOM: 738 sf/150 4.92_co_ ace_ m /10 FT SIDE YARD SETBACK LINE MA-T ION... ZONING: LB EXI: tr SITE: 155,204.28 SQ. FT. = 3.563 ACRES m - CRES EXIST. TOTAL REQUIRED 32 spaces i_ BUILDING: EXISTING: 20,585 SF PRC AREA PROPOSED:5,384 SF pRC PROPOSED PRODUCTION AREA: 4216sf/500 8.43 spaces T/G .5 PXISTIN6 EXISTI l'REES TREE5 PROPOSED OFFICE AREA: 2803 sf/100 28.03 spaces - LOT EXISTING: 13% PRC yE COVERAGE PROPOSED: 16.7% PRC PROPOSED MEZZ. STORAGE 827 sVl 000 .82spaces i PROPOSED MECH. STORAGE: 530 sf/1000 .53 soaces l lbr`~' i LANDSCAPED EXISTING: 56%0 / PROPOSED TOTAL REQUIRED: 37.81 spaces I AREA PROPOSED: 52.64% / 0-1 TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 70 spaces a / / / / /\yX REQUIRED: SURVEYOR: ECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C. TOTAL EXISTING PARKING 49 spaces O 1230 TRAVELER STREET TOTAL NEW PARKING 21 spaces LAM =xlsrIN6 NY 1 (LAND BANKED) TREES LICENSOE#d 6181971 / / / , • (y DATED MAY 15, 2001 OW V1 $ :NCO. SANITAR SANITARY CALCULATIONS Z li S+ I. 1. ALLOY 1. ALLOWABLE DENSITY r TOTAL TOTAL ACERAGE: 3.563 ACRES J\ HYDRI HYDROGEOLOGICAL ZONE: ZONE IV WATEI WATER SUPPLY: PUBLIC WATER ALLOV ALLOWABLE: 3.563 Acres x 300 GPD. = 1,069 GPD. TOTAL SITE SEWAGE DESIGN FLOW: 1,019 GPD. Q C~ TO TAL -A r' EX15TI II. SAM SANITARY DESIGN Q Z EXI5TIN6 SIGN WITH y SEWAC SEWAGE DESIGN FLOW: ad 45 (2) EXISTING UP ~LI6HT5 Ek15TIN6 EXIST[ EXISTING WINERY (SYSTEM #1): ~A O 1. TASTING ROOM (0.10 GPD/SF) vi ~g 1.TA 0.10 GPD X 738 S.F.= 74 GPD Z 2. OF1 2. OFFICE SPACE (0.06 GPD/SF) O VJ FLA6POLEI~- 0.06 GPD X 320 SF = 19 GPD 3. WM 3. WINE PRODUCTION (0.04 GPD/SF) 153' i 0.04 GPD X 6,992 SF = 280 GPD ,.4. STC 4. STORAGE BUILDING (0.04 GPD/SF) • NEW WASTE WATER SYSTEM 0.04 GPD X 10,408 SF = 417 GPD N 1;200 6AL SETTLEHET TANK - STLQ,_- i ' \9.r~u3 EXISTII EXISTING SEWAGE FLOW = 790 GPD O (STL) (6 FT VIA x 5 PT HT) PROPC PROPOSED ADDITION TO EXISTING WINERY Z N 8 FT VIA x 8 FT Hr LEAC44INS - o ` 1. WIh 1. WINE PRODUCTION (0.04 GPDISF) POOL POOL (LP) _ 0.04 GPD X 3,690 SF= 148 GPD Lu Y 2. OFFICE SPACE (0.06 GPD/SF) V EXISTING 5EPTIG SYSTEM `J ExP'L Ly FJ~\pE 2. OFF 0.06 GPD X 1,353 SF = 81 GPD W ` ADDITI ADDITIONAL SEWAGE FLOW = 229 GPD Q) 2,500 GAL SEPnr, TANK (ST) (FJ(15T1N6) uil (2) 10 FT. VIA. X-12 PT. HT. LEAGHINS zi` ~O A TOTAL TOTAL SITE SEWAGE FLOW = 1.019 GPD Q UA T/1+44.1 POOL (LP) (EXISTING) 13 N 10 FT VIA x 12 FT HT EXPANSION POOL, SANITARY SANITARY SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS SEPTIC S SEPTIC SYSTEM - 1,019 GPD c z xo I.SEPTI i.SEPTIC TANK (ST): 1,019 GPD x 2 DAYS FLOW = 2,060 GAL G USER USE MINIMUM: 2,500 GAL SEPTIC TANK (existing) I 2-LEACHING POOLS ( LP): 1,019 /1.5 S.F./GPD = 679.3 S.F. 44 I ~ Nrl NUTH ~~~/~/~j x'1/\..~?1E . N, 2 I USE M USE MINIMUM (2 - 10 FT. DIA. X 12 FT. HT.) = 754 S.F. ~ PLUS 50% EXPANSION (EXP): 1 - 10 FT DIA x 12 FT HT Y cgs O PLUS / //~j~/%// • ys [ III. WASTE WAl WASTE WATER PROCESSING NEW PROD NEW PRODUCTION AREA • ~ ' G WASH E WASH DOWN OF TANKS 285 GPD \•'f\W9 • • , .M1 - _ 44 TOT/ TOTAL PROCESSING 285 GPD 00 Z. VINES` WASTE WAT WASTE WATER PRO FSSING REQUIREMENT N Q • a WASTE WA' WASTE WATER SYSTEM - 285 GPD ~g• c~ pr+ 1.SETTLEh 1.SETTLEMENT TANK: 285 GPD x 2 DAYS FLOW = 570 GAL EXI S IN& 1- 1.20 15f }JI TREES 1 - 1,200 GAL SETTLEMENT TANK (STL) (8 FT DIA x 5 FT HT) W -J. i 2-LEACHING POOLS 285 GPD 11.5 SF I GPD = 190 SF ' ` ' ' ~ U S F R F USF R FT MA v 2 C uT -n^- n 11 - W Y W 9 ~ 1 ate. 5a 7~ W• ~ x 5 LOCATION MAP w U)• EXISTING TREES % +1T.2 EXISTING y E OF e,. . TREE5 ~ 0 *yU ; srAyFO~ T/ +445 . ~yS Q\ d Pie * o Id Sound c z I_ 0J~ A Ave iJ 17953-1 ~ h EXISTING TREES 10 V~e '~f0 RC ~ SITE `C'FA N4~i R EC O: 05 08 DRAWN BY: EX SITTIINf' ~09p 't'om LAM CHECKED BY: NS ANQJ DATE: SEPTEMBER 29, 2005 SCALE: EX TINS~ 1 20'-0" 6 TREES I SHEET TITLE: +44.4 SITE PLAN 127.60' ~ lJ a SHEET NO.: °o SITE PLAN 0 SCALE: I"=20'.O" 0 N m N m s P PLANNING / SCHDS I EXISTING BARREL RO M ~ II II LOADIN LOADING AREA a I I II II II I I C) II II II Q I I II II II ~ ~ I I II II II 0 LOADII LOADING DOGk DOCK BOTTLING LINE AREA N II I II II II W II II II - . O 0 3 EXIST. TRQIGN DRAIN Cl) z u TANKS (TYPIOAU O H NM IWOCH DRAIN I °a W NEW BOTTLING LINE AREA 060 Z_ NEW p I' ROI EW PRODUCTION AREA Z z O EXIST. TREMM DRAIN 0 Q LINE O!' MEZZANIIS AEO•/E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I i STOR. uNe or' M NEW z Q NEW CONFERENCE OFFICE w EXISTING OUTDOOR FERMENTATION AREA Q TOILET U v STOR. i w z HALL - - - ENTRY _ EXIST. TRENCH DRAIN CL OP STOR. 2 TAWCS (TYPIOAU LOBBY r III II~ Ili II y~R~ OFFICE STATION - - - m- - - m7 a Z ++t. NEW III RDOM II)~' II-_ _~I _ II II II III U) TOILET OFFICE II TI II II II II II II III so~ LU II I EXI~~INO COVERED CP,6~HIN6 ~ HING AREA III D w' II II II II II II I II III ate, l9 EXIST OFFICE AREA z ---'I I C ~ I(CI l ( II l( 1( II I~ II II II III NN• JV~ m I I T~ cM~~~u I II II - - II I I ~ 1f ~ I I II III ML~HANIOAL II III 5T,4TION i I (I I ) ( I) ( ) ~I ) I iRr~oM 44 I I I I III ~w~ OF PJ O EXIST. OFFICE OVA : ST~F! }ps fV L(~J:3 STOR. I EXI EXII6TING FERMENTATIOi l ROOM II III p4 h H.C. 017 -1 TOILE r II II II I ~ II II II ul EXIST. II III IF TASTING ROOM _ III OJEC , : 0508 I TAWS (YPIG I III I DRAWN BY: NS CHECKEDBY: NS IL DATE: I I II II II I ml m m SEPTEMBER 29.2005 - - - - - - SCALEJ18" = 1- _ 0" SHEET TITLE. FIRST FLOOR PLAN SHEET NO: PA PARTIAL FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: SCALE: 1/6" = V-0- a 0 0 1 0 N O PLANNING / SCHDS O N O cl m II II II LOADING LOAD IN6 AREA EXISTING BARREL RJbM EX TING ROOF E OW II II II II II II II II LOADIh LOADING ROOK I I I I I I DOCK II II II O 0 3 EXIT EXIT CORRIDOR U) z DN MECHANICAL o ~ S STORAC+E ° ° W a ~oZ z~ STORAC STORAGE MEZZANINE 0 `vEA ROOF BELON! EXISTING OUTDOOR PERMENTATION AREA a MULTI- PURPOSE OFFICE AREA oo z W PROD PRODUCTION AREA 61 BELOW W " EMPLOYEE OC KITCHEN DN LOOKER $HOY~ER AREA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - II II II ~ I I I I I III ~a• I III J~ s°° w~•~goi EXI9TIING CO\/ERED CRU5HING AREA 4 AREA W. II II II I ~ I I I I I III ate. Va II II II II II I III N N• TnCK ii 5 550ALE EXI5TIN6 ROOF BELOW II II II III I III I I ML~HANIGAL III EXI EXI~TIN& FERMENTATION RGPM I J-ROOM TM'f4~ of Pi;',rp . . ST" II II II III ~ II yai II II II I I ~ tt ~ I I III ` _ AEG'' 017953- v II II II I I I I I I II II II III Al I'll '9A ~-t ROJECT : 0508 II II II II I III III DRAWN BY: NS II II II III I I I II II II III I I I I I CHECKED BY: NS II II II II II II DATE: II II II ~ m mJ SEPTEMBER 29 2005 - - - - SCALE118" = 1. - 0" SHEET TIT LE: SECOND FLOOR PLAN SHEET NO: IPA,RTIAI TIAL SECOND FLOOR PLAN M N m O 2 N O O N PLANNING / SCHDS m N m NEW ADDITION EXISTING STRUCTURE EXISTING STRUCTURE GROSS GABLE WITH SHED DORMER EXISTING NO ROOF PENETRATIONS (MECHANICAL, EXISTING CUPOLA CUPOLA NEW HIM PLUMBING VENTS) ON THIS ELEVATION NEW WINDOWS HEIGHT OF NEW TO MY TO MATCH STRUCTURE TO EXI_ EXISTING MATCH EXI5TING EXISTING ® WINDOWS EXISTING EXISTING T qml ~F>< 15 WINDOWS W N W G I NINDOWS _ A I TI M G I I ~.0 -EXISTING - - IG - EXISVNC M Fl E-] FE-H] ffl 0 3 UJI F=-] F7-7711 M M FFED El Elt z z F A H I T XI I R F N ! S I IN I , P , i I II -~I o W I m F1 ~ EXIST N N TLo ~>GISTI ~>GISTIN Q Z IPPOE ~0 OO - SIDING 060 z F' 51~1~G~ „ 1v 'r Inw rE rE Xl= O NEW DOOR J NEW WINDOWS NEW ENTRY NEW SIDING TO REMOVE EXISTING DOORS MATCH EXISTING EXISTING DOOR WINDOWS NEW IO" SOUARE 4RE WINDOW5 COLUMNS TYPICAL ZPROVIDE NEW WINDOWS Z SOUTH ELEVATION EXISTING LU SCALE: 1/8" =1' -0" W" NEW ADDITION EXISTING STRUCTURE EXISTING STRUCTURE GROSS GABLE, PROVIDE ROOF EXISTING EXI5TING PENETRATIONS (MECHANICAL, PLUMBING CUPOLA CUPOLA NEW WIN NEW WINDOWS VENTS) ON THI5 ELEVATION ONLY HEIGHT OF NEW ® TO h TO MATCH STRUCTURE TO EX EXISTING MATCH EXISTING EXISTING WINDOW5 EXISTING OVERHEAD ~ ~i ~ III I I it III I Z. 5T'RUCTURE COVERING III T E II N CRUSHING AREA EXISTING tea. SIbIN6 W J S nL I z ~ ® I W • q I C7F1, N L ~ ® E I`a°TIN6 - - - ----1 -1 - V/ N. I FT] I 1. i 11 ' 1 hr i EXNSTIN XIS INC, EX'IISTING 51 DING SI ING ~51DI r1~, OF Pi ; `^,^hy ~ . STF EXISTING RAILING NEW SIDING TO EXISTING OVERHEAD D MATCH EXISTING DOOR / V ~ ~ ? ~r?Ai q mz~~zi6 0 953-1 NORTH ELEVATION PREMIUM WINE GROUP (NON-COMBUSTIBLE) Eb ARAN. SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" CONSTRUCTION TYPE: STEEL FRAME (NON-GOP PROPOSED (USES: BUSINE55 (OFFICE) E) INDUSTRIAL (WINERY FERMI .RY FERMENTATION) ROJECT 0508 )RAGE (CA5E STORAGE / MECHANICAL) ACCESSORY STORAGE (of HEATING/COiOLING: GAS FORGED AIR HEATINC :Z HEATING AND COOLING SYSTEM, DRAWN BY: NS ROOF TOP UNITS WILL NOT WILL NOT BE USED CHECKED BY: "HARDIPANEL"-SIERRA 8"-FIBER NS SIDING: MATCH EXISTING: "HARDIF CEMENT, VERTICAL SIDING L SIDING PANELS WITH SIMULATED WOOD DATE: TEXTURE WITH BATTENS, PA TTENS, PAINTED ,SEPTEMBER 29 2005 SCALE: (BENJAMIN MOORE-HG-I"12, =-HC-1-12, REVERE PEWTER) TO MATCH EXISTING 1/8" = 1' - 0" TRIM: MATCH EXISTING: "HARDI 7 "HARDI TRIM" - FIBER CEMENT SHEET TITLE: SMOOTH TRIM AT ALL WIND ALL WINDOW AND DOOR CASINGS, SOUTH CORNER BOARDS, FRIEZE E FRIEZE BOARDS, ETC. PAINTED (BENJAMIN MOORE -CHINA -CHINA WHITE) TO MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION ROOFING: MATCH EXISTING: STANDIN STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF, COLOR MATCH EXISTING (E \ISTING (EMERALD GREEN) WINDOWS: "ANDERSEN" CASEMENT WII ,EMENT WINDOWS OR FIXED (WHITE) MAIN DOORS: MATCH EXISTING: MAIN EN MAIN ENTRY DOORS: CUSTOM WOOD DOORS COLOR: MATCH EXISTING i EXI5TIN5 (DARK GREEN) SHEET NO: EXIT DOORS: MATCH EXISTING: METAL - METAL - PAINTED TO MATCH TRIM ~a UTILITY DOORS: MATCH EXISTING: METAL - METAL - PAINTED FACTORY FINISH WHITE 3 a N O O N O O N PLANNING / SCHDS O M m i EXISTING 5TRUGTURE EXISTING CUPOLA EXISTING GH I MNEY E ® ® BEYOND EXISTING OVERHEAD 5TRUGTURE GOVERIN6 ~i GRUSHIN6 AREA ~0 j j (f qc FI i I OW EXISTING I III I ~ I' II I,N I IIII COVERED -I z li ENTRY i I O i. I H O F ®FIEL I a a In a 0 In IN a in i I n A 0- 0 In 0 0 in 7 hT a LIJ XISTIN ' SIGN XI5 IN - 5 D1 - od'o EXISTINGIi I I EX I5TI N6 SIDING SIDING GATE rE O HIM EXISTING XSTN EXI5TIN6 EXI5TIN6 ro EXISTING EXISTING VENT EXISTING E I EXI5TIN6 ELECTRIC ENTRY DOOR TRELLI5 I WINDOW5 S VENT METER FENCE DOORS STRUCTURES z W Y EAST 4ST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1' .E: 1/8" = 1' -0" WM EXISTING 5TRUGTURE EXI5TIN6- <15TIN6 CUPOLA :UPOLA ® H Nl z• m % 1 VIII j Ij III I I~ I I S li I II ! li III I I I II I IIII II I II I h i W ` I I i hil I mw. III'~I II I I ' I lllll~ J Hdil aF-. ~a (n U). i E I TI 6 XI5TIN6 6 j ~X1571N ~'S1DIN6', ~ ~ it i! ~ I ~ I IN 1 I I I i i i S~DIN~ ~ I sr' a E, EXIc ..TING EXI5TING EXISTING VENT VENT EXI5TIN6VENT DOOR 0179 3-1 FgEb G~ P OJECT N 0508 WEST EST ELEVATION DRAWN BV: UT SCALE: 118" = l'-( 118" = 1' 0" CHECKED BV: NS DATE: SEPTEMBER 29, 2005, SCALE: 1/8" o 1• - O•l SHEET TITLE: EAST & WEST ELEVATION SHEET NO: 4 PLANNING / SCHDS REVISIONS: DECEMBER 21, 2005 i~ SITE DATA / SCTM # 1000.121-06.01 PAI PROPERTY: 35 COX NECK ROAD EXIS PARKING CALCULATIONS ADRESS MATTITUCK, NY 11952 EXIS EXIST. STORAGE BUILDING: 9906sf/1000 9.9 spaces OWNER: PREMIUM WINE GROUP, LLC EXIS EXIST. OFFICE SPACE: 320 sf/100 3.2 spaces EXIST. PRODUCTION: 6,992 sf/500 13.98 spaces ZONING: LB EXIE EXIST. TASTING ROOM: 738 sf/150 4.92 spaces i SITE: 155,204.28 SQ. FT. = 3.563 ACRES i CRES EXIST. TOTAL REQUIRED 32 spaces \ i BUILDING: EXISTING: 20,585 SF PRO PROPOSED PRODUCTION AREA: 4216sf/500 8.43 spaces TIC 45.3 XI5TIN6 ~ TR€€5 TREES / N(y0 AREA PROPOSED:5,384 SF PRO PROPOSED OFFICE AREA: 2803 sf/100 28.03 spaces t'E LOT EXISTING: 13% PRO PROPOSED MEZZ. STORAGE 827 sf/1000 .82spaces COVERAGE PROPOSED: 16.7% PRC PROPOSED MECH. STORAGE: 530 sf/1000 .53 spaces Y I \ - - - - - EXISTING ALLOWABLE: 20% PROPOSED TOTAL REQUIRED: 37.81 spaces ~ TREES ~ i Ng LANDSCAPED EXISTING: 56% i ~-x\5 E X . " I AREA PROPOSED: 52.64% TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 70 spaces = 0 i FtiN.' REQUIRED: 35% TOTAL EXISTING PARKING 49 spaces O SURVEYOR: PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C. 1230 TRAVELER • 1230 TRAVELER STREET TOTAL NEW PARKING 21 spaces LAWN / (LAND BANKED) W / LP ; EX15TING (1 SOUTHOLD NY 11971 LICENSE # 49618 Z c o~ DATED MAY 15, 2001 SANITAF V J I/ SANITARY CALCULATIONS Z T/ 45.5 IL III oy~' a~S .I r 1. 1. IALLO% 1. 1. ALLOWABLE DENSITY O 0 OTA TOTAL ACERAGE: 3.563 ACRES NEW RAIN WATER DRAINAGE u~ py HYDR HYDROGEOLOGICAL ZONE: ZONE IV SYSTEM "All 90 I . WATE WATER SUPPLY: PUBLIC WATER Q RELOCATED q ~'Q ALLOI ALLOWABLE: 3.563 Acres x 300 GPD. =1,069 GPD. (2) 4 FT VIA NE~W DISTRIBUTION CHAMBER (DG) LEAGHIN6 TOTAL . oi ~ TOTAL SITE SEWAGE DESIGN FLOW: 1,019 GPD. D (1) IO FT VIA xI I FT HT RELOCATED LEAGHIN6 Q POOL POOL (LP) } Q EXI5TIN 0. SANIL E5 SEWAI II. SANITARY DESIGN Q z (2) 10 FT VIA x 6 FT HT NEW LEAGHIN6 Z SEWAGE DESIGN FLOW: 06 POOL (LP) l _ EXIST EXISTING WINERY (SYSTEM #1): 45~ \ EXISTING SIGN WITH / LL : 1. W 1. TASTING ROOM (0.10 GPD/SF) Z X ~ LP ' 0.10 GPD X 738 S.F.= 74 GPD (2) EXISTING UP / O _ -OvG ~X\ 1' 9L 2.OF O GONG, 2. OFFICE SPACE (0.06 GPD/SF) O 0.06 GPD X 320 SF = 19 GPD EXISTIN6~LIGHTS O i LP2 ,L 3. Wl 3. WINE PRODUCTION (0.04 GPD/SF) FLAGPOLE A', 11 NOWM: 0.04 GPD X 6,992 SF = 280 GPD CJ 153' LP 4. ST 4. STORAGE BUILDING (0.04 GPD/SF) Q 0.04 GPD X 10,408 SF = 417 GPD NEW WASTE WATER SYSTEM EXIST EXISTING SEWAGE FLOW = 790 GPD Q (1) 1,200 GAL SETTLEMENT TANK ,~TLO, 1 s y~p$1 F\G PROP GG (GGNG. O~~ 1. WI PROPOSED ADDITION TO EXISTING WINERY Z 1. WINE PRODUCTION (0.04 GPD/SF) \ (STL) (8 FT DIA x 5 FT HT) P; 0.04 GIRD X 3,690 SF= 148 GPD W Y (I) 8 FT VIA x 8 FT HT LEAGHIN6 2. OFFICE SPACE (0.06 GPD/SF) V POOL POOL (LP) 4\ EX\9G G 2.OF 0.06 GPD X 1,353 SF = 81 GPD ADDI1 ADDITIONAL SEWAGE FLOW = 229 GPD t EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM -XP TOTA TOTAL SITE SEWAGE FLOW = 1,019 GPD F- (1) 2,500 6AL SEPTIC TANK (ST) (EXISTING) (2) 10 FT. VIA.-X-12 FT. HT. LEAGHIN6 SANITAR SANITARY SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS Q SEPTIC SEPTIC SYSTEM -1,019 GPD 1I Y T/ +44.1 Pio"-CP) (EXISTING) ST) Ii''f Is (Ur10 FT DIA x 12 FT FYT EXPANSION PO W- / USE 1.SEPTIC TANK (ST): 1,019 GPD x 2 DAYS FLOW = 2,060 GAL Z (EXP) 1 P 2.LEAI USE MINIMUM: 2,500 GAL SEPTIC TANK (existing) 2.LEACHING POOLS (LP): 1,019 / 1.5 S.F./GPD = 679.3 S.F. ul \ J STING G O RR I 44 EVE EN / - USE EF~NOe yt fir O PLUE USE MINIMUM (2 -10 FT. DIA. X 12 FT. HT.) = 754 S.F. PLUS 50% EXPANSION (EXP): 1 - 10 FT DIA x 12 FT HT I SH PLAN G5 6 , ~:A'aw 2ELOG , ' • pP-b' III. WASTE WF WASTE WATER PROCESSING (I) I LET DIA 6 FT NEW PRO NEW PRODUCTION AREA WASH WASH DOWN OF TANKS 285 GPD X y P dA TO' TOTAL PROCESSING 285 GPD op z • 'rX ° ° / 1 \tl WASTE WA WASTE WATER PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS: N Q • w EXISTI VINE , Ex\y 0 WASTE W WASTE WATER SYSTEM - 285 GPD T/ +44.8 Q i ~I . ~W PL N'(\N . 1.SETTLI 1.SETTLEMENT TANK: 285 GPD x 2 DAYS FLOW = 570 GAL EXISTING 1 - 1,200 GAL SETTLEMENT TANK (STL) (8 FT DIA x 5 FT HT)' 3 TPEE5 2.LEACHI 2.LEACHING POOLS 285 GPD / 1.5 SF I GPD = 190 SF W J • I z Z O Ex~y~ USES uj. USE 8 FT DIA x 8 FT HT POOL (LP) = 200 SF m w • a $ ~a~• <NU m I / LYING \ \ P.~R'f_". ! .x\~ _ • y . /+44.5 +44.5 rn w IV. RAIN WATE RAIN WATER RUNOFF DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS: EXISTING TREES ~O \5 NEYV +44.2 NEW ROOF AREA OF WINERY DRY WELL AREA x RAINFALL x RUNOFF FACTOR EXI571N6 I ~ \ TREES / ©ff j,,r "A" 8,811 SF x (2/12 FT.) x 1.0 = 1410 CU FT t SE 6Y y1p . ST4'c Ap USE: (3) NEW 10'-0" DIAMETER x 3'-8" HIGH SOLID DOME USE: (2) NEW 10'-0" DIAMETER x 6' HIGH POOLS a \ USE: (l) RELOCATED 10'-0" DIAMETER x 7' HIGH POOL M Z \ ~p1 N \ ~1 Wc(N P\ ~N +44.1 / u USE (2) 4 FT DIA DISTRIBUTION CHAMBER (DC) 017953-1 T/ +44.5 \ EX, (3) 10'-0" X 3'-8" SOLID DOME = 326.1 CU. FT. ED ABA EXISTING TREES \ SSo AiN NL' 5 I (3 (2) 10'-0" X 5'-0" STORM DRAIN RING = 684.2 CU FT N P C Ex\SS EeOO\~~ (1) 10'-0" X 7'-0" STORM DRAIN RING = 479 CU FT ~P PROJECTNO0508 1489.3 CU. FT, EL~G \C' PI PROVIDED REQUIRED DRAWN BY: 1489.3 CU. FT. > 1410 CU. FT. N-q \ I LAWN IN E 6 P TREES E>C\ ?Q CHECKED BY: AWN ~E~ 2 ~ 2115 DATE: SEPTEMBER 29, 2005 0 SCALE: EX STING 6 \ I TREES TLE: '-0" LOCATION MAP SHEET TITLE: 20 QO I +44.4 T/ 44.2 SITE PLAN 0d NAG e * o Id Sound ,p 0 04 SHEET NO.: a 701 Ave te T/G+44.3 SITE PLAN ~i 0 SITE N N SCALE: 1"=20'-O" O O N N a PLANNING / SCHDS