Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-8.-2-7.1 OFFICE LOCATION: & Vre SO(/TyO MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 * Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) 411 Southold, NY 11971 G Q Telephone: 631 765-1938 i~ Fax: 631765-3136 ~~'~OOUNTY,~~ LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Jim King, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: September 13, 2013 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review for NATHAN E. SAINT-AMAND SCTM#1000-8-2-7.1 J.M.O. Environmental Consulting on behalf of NATHAN E. SAINT-AMAND requests a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit to repair eroded shoreline by installing approximately 80' of armor layer rip-rap; a 10'x80' area immediately seaward of the eroded bank shall be excavated to a depth of 4' with the excavated material stored; geotextile fabric shall be installed and a 4" layer of crushed stone (filter layer) shall be placed on top of it; a two-tier layer of boulders shall be placed on top of the stone filter; stone splash pad installed utilizing the excavated material; rocks (minimum 1 ton) shall be placed onto existing grade as wave energy dissipaters. Located: 711 Chocomount Drive, Fishers Island. SCTM# 8-2-7.1 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed actions are CONSISTENT with the LWRP. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local i Waterfront Revitalization Program. A aroposed action will be evaluated. as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects anon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town l. 3: If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. TIas each answer must be Mlained in detail. listing both supporting and non- supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and undertaken. conditions, it shall not be A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: 0 7AUG website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B.. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION 2013 SCT M# 2 7 „y^ Surd of TruZtes PROJECT NAME Erosion control-Storm Sandt Repairs The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board ? Planning Board O Building Dept. ? Board of Trustees 0 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): S E i - (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital ? construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) ? .(b). Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: x? Nature and extent of action: Please see attached Project Description for Nathan E. Saint-Amand 711 Chocomount Drive, Fishers Island S.C.T.M.No. 1000-8-2-7 Applicant proposes to repair a Storm Sandy damaged shoreline by installing approximately 80' of armor layer rip rap. A 10x'80' area immediately seaward of the eroded bank shall be excavated to a depth of 4' with the excavated material stored, geotextile fabric shall be installed and a 4" layer of crushed stone (filter layer) shall be placed on top of it. A two tier layer of boulders shall be placed on top of the stone filter, stone splash pad installed utilizing the excavated material. Rocks (minimum 1 ton) shall be placed onto existing grade as wave energy dissipaters. As per the enclosed plans prepared by CME Associates last dated 6/14/13 Location of action: 711 Chocomount Drive, Fishers Island 2.51 Site acreage: Present land use: Single family dwelling Present zoning classification: R-120 2. If an application for the proposed action bas been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following j information shall be provided: (a) Nameofapplicant: NathanE. Saint-Amand 2E 88th Street (b) Mailing address: New York, NY 10218 i 212-722-7522 (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( ) Unknown (d) Application number, if any, Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes 2 No D If yes, which state or federal agency? N . Y . S . D . E . C . C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. ~f Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhauces community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. FxJ Yes E] No ? Not Applicable The project does not involve "development" and should have ne ati impact upon open mac ' the rn n;rv Tt'is felt that this project is consl tent with P.ttach additional sheets if necessary policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria Yes ? No ? Not Applicable The project shall have no impact upon any historicor archaeological resources It i felt that this nra4ect is consistenat with this policy Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ? Yes ? No E] Not Applicable The project will have no impacts upon scenic resources or impact the visual quality of the Tnwn Ti- i c fcl i- i•hq+ thi c project is consistent with this policy Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ? Yes ? No ? Not Applicable The project will not cause accelerated erosion of adjacent properties, will not create any aesthetic impairments, there shall be no loss of marine or wetland habitat and there will be no loss of public recreational resources. It is felt that this rnjent is rnnoistent wiiia th1a policy Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Polities Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria D Yes ? No ? Not Applicable The orolect will have no n gati.>P i pA-rG +,ir+n i->,e~+,~i+taa-nr quantity of potable water. It is felt that this project is consistent with this policy Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. © ? ? Yes No Not Applicable The project shall have no negative impacts u on the quality or ..ter} f nc} on of an} wPtlands_, a osy"` ms ~r arPacof_ , Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats. It ia_fglt_that this project is consistent with this policy. Attach additional sheets if necessary I Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. © Yes F] No F~ Not Applicable The project shall have no impact upon air quality. It is felt that this project is consistent with this olic i I i Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. © Yes m No El Not Applicable The orolect does not involve the uge n f or th _ a l of solid waste or hazardous substances and wastes. it is felt that this project is consistent with this policy PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. . 0 YeZI No E] Not Applicable The project will have no impact upon public access to, and the recreational use of coastal waters, public lands or the public resources of the Town. It is felt that this project is consistent with this policy Attach addttonal sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ? Yes ? No M Not Applicable The project will have no impact upon Southold's water-dependent uses o o hp c; ing. of npw water-dependent uses in suitable locations, 1't is felt that this project is consistent with this policy Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. © Yes ? No ? Not Applicable The project will have n impart upon the c,nh.1-ainahlojigp pf living marine resources. It is felt that th' nrn3 t i consistent with this policy i Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ? Yes ? No 0 Not Applicable j The prof t does no i n of p aurj oul i-, i l anAc Tt f l i- that this policy.is.not applicable to this project I Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ? Yes ? No © Not Applicable The project does not involve the use of or development of energy or mineral resources It is felt that hi policy is not applicable to this project PREPARED BY_cl.Pnn F. 'Tt,¢t TITLE pgpnt DATE h m,m_e TRFA91.(~ VtlIIO VA p \ n.w m ~ wa~ aw I m p~/. e M1~ ~ iwvl • ~ nn ff[ ~ ro m p° i .'Mal ~ >d" - - - O - - COUN OF SUFFOLK © e °pX ml - RetlPApe6y Ta SemmAW, i e IRON PIPE / p 6 p_sv r UND 17-4A FO ~ ~ cannax o. 1~-~ 1R-u OO FlSHFAS IYIf~O N p LOT wllEfl MWNS U gWC0 C R LM O15 m E m m r ~ d C u-u ~o-ix U " U Y r E I l \1 /1 Y m-u p~ ll a 33v N-n F--i 3 J~ I 1 ~ iI I I I I1 CHERRY 0 1\ %I I ICI li- W. a \c m-ia a m /~U o LL w oNeisn rA U 7-+ W N o LL zzy \\3 c~ U xo-~ `ij ' V ~ y F v GRAVEL i / 9°°c e0°C0cN 0 7~ ,--I V U DRIVEWAY 20-V z, RSSe ! T I O. ~O xo-e 'm0s, i A L w oW a SITS"_ p f)A 3 F STONE h~! u5~6gd x ,°A w-° PATIO . ~ ~ 950 3'4ia ~r'T J ~ / 11) _ coy P,pFO ~ S ~~~40" E cti N/F o-+oa G~0G0~ rl w 24' J 3,_-- FISHERS ISLAND N t+l MAPLE Tss DEVELOPMENT CORP. w mm Lm ;F F-I "CHOCOMOUNT BEACH" Eus M y o 2 uussuu uxv must _ J 1 r / o LOCATION MAP MAP SCALE 1"=400' N FLAG T / A rl_ POLE S~p1E OF Nfry y~9 , m a ~3SrP.os , ~ N~o ri cr~,o L CHERRY a I MAP REFERENCES oe h°A Qu ,t: 60 BEGIN ARMi ROCK RIPRAP SU BEGIN ARMOR LAYER /fop OF \ =i~~ O ~RIPRAP SLOPE 1.) PLAN MADE FOR FISHERS ISLAND ESTATES CHOCOMOUNT iLAND ESTATES SHOWING PARCELS IN VICINITY OF SLAND, N.Y. SCALE "=100' CHANDLER & PALMER a f UqG\ECc, EMB NKME T 1 ENGRSNORWICH, A CONN. NOV. 1965 ADDITION° 1965 ADDITIONS NOV. 30, 1967. 14_ j 9 I _ 2.) PLAN OF PROPERTY TO BE CONVEYED BY SAINT-AMAND SCALE: 1"=100' CHANDLER PAL CONVEYED BY CASS CANFIELD TO NATHAN D. CHANDLER PALMER & KING NORWICH CONN. ceonal 1 _ 2 OCTOBER 10, 1984. 1 CEDAR nF APPARENT WASH OUT AND STORM DEPOSIT _ 1/ ~ /HIGH WATER UNE(AHWL) 3.) COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREA MAP TOW ELEV.-3.3 / NEW YORK PHOTO NO. 35-861-83 SHEET 40 AREA MAP TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, -83 SHEET 40-Fl OF 49 APPROVED 8/29/88 R CEDAR ~.J MEAN HIGH WATER UNE(MHW) REVISIONS 10/28/91. ELEV.-2.8 PROMDE ROCKS PLACED \00• END ARMOR LAYER INTO TO EXISTING GRADE Z NSF (SEE SECTION 1) Q Z FISHERS ISLAND RIPRAP SLOPE roe of 10 NOTE O CD DEVELOPMENT CORP. EMBANKMENT 7 9 d Lj o _0 1.) THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED FOR THE PA HEREON. ANY EXTENSION OF THE USE BEYONL :D FOR THE PARTIES AND PURPOSE INDICATED T IE USE BEYOND THE PURPOSED AGREED TO z D U - EROSION APPROXIMATE TOE OF _ BETWEEN 1HE CLIENT AND THE SURVEYOR EX( SURVEYOR EXCEEDS THE SCOPE OF THE ¢ p Z w z Z V PROPOSED SLOPE / J ' J I ICI ox Q ENGAGEME11T. N W~\~ UNITS OF COASTAL 'OCKI &S / P 2.) IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE STATE EDUCATI STATE EDUCATION LAW FOR ANY PERSON, J Q q• EROSION HAZARD LINE RO KI SHEEP 40-Fl OF 49 UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A I ZEC71ON OF A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, TO Fina- QaV) o z PER AMP REFERENCE No.3 i / f7 ALTER AN ITEM IN ANY WAY. 5 Z n 3.) ONLY COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MARKED WI Q JEY MARKED WITH THE LAND SURVEYOR'S L'i Of LLI o N SIGNATURE AND AN ORIGINAL EMBOSSED OR I 7M80SSED OR INK SEAL ARE THE PRODUCT OF z m BOTTOM OF THE LAND SURVEYOR. z = Z EMBANKMENT ~4FO / G 4.) COORDINATE DISTANCES ARE MEASURED F E MEASURED FROM U.S. COAST AND GEODETIC 0 Q r IMAGE 1 / O SURVEY TRIANGULATON STATION "CHOCOMOUI, N "CHOCOMOUNT 2". V) = a 5.) SITE I IN THE TOWN OF SDUTHOLD, COU<• SECTION 8, , BLOCK 2, LOT 7. DUTHOLD, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK TAX MAP 1000, Q WASH OUT AND STORM DEPOSIT ~n / / Z / / 6.) TOTAL AREA = 2.513. z 7.) SITE IS LOCATED IN R-120 ZONE. ZONE. / / 20' 15' 0 20' 8.) BASE FOR LEVELS: MLLW. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET / 9.) PORTIONS THIS SITE LIE WITHIN FLOOD WITHIN FLOOD ZONES VE - ELEV.=16, AND AE ELEV.=ll PER FIRM-FLOOD INSURANCE RATE URANCE RATE MAP, SUFFOLK COUNTY NEW YORK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD /J360813 PANEL 39 OF 1 MAP REVISED SEPTEMBER 25, 2009. 'ANEL 39 OF 1026 MAP NUMBER: 3610300039H 2009. 2 (~a p pp F~ EROSION n LS ll._~__7 ~Y! LS II~II~-,Il{Il o t_ AUG p 3 2013 - u o W GENERA NOTES: So:dh~6iL;;u ~ 1.) GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TO BE INSTALLED IN A -Board of Tjj5tcus INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS - BOTTOM OF TOP OF BANK RECOMMENDATIONS. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1 MINIMUM OF 12 INCH OVERLAP AT ADJACENT > y EMBANKMENT 2.5'3 7'3 SECTIONS. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC IS TO BE PROF IS TO BE PROPERLY ANCHORED AS TO PREVENT w IMAGE 2 16 16 RIPPING OR TEARING DURING INSTALLATION OF JSTALLATION OF OVERBURDEN MATERIAL. TOE OF ARMOR LAYER RIPRAP ' ' - EROSION SHORE PROTECTION 31 RIPRAP 2.) ARMOR STONE SHALL BE FREE FROM ORG REE FROM ORGANIC DEBRIS, DURABLE, FREE o IECTION- - - - 14 FROM SEVERE CRACKS, SEAMS AND OTHER DE AND OTHER DEFECTS THAT WOULD INCREASE 1.5 _14 _ _ (SEE CHART) 2 DETERIORATION FROM THE ENVIRONMENT OR C AND PLACEMENT. RONMENT OR CAUSE BREAKING DURING HANDLING 12 - - - - ti(_I - _ MEAN HIGH 12 d z EXISTING WATER LINE (MHW) 3.) FILTER STONE SHALL BE 4 INCH DIAMETEF INCH DIAMETER NOMINAL SIZE UNLESS PROVIDE SPLASH PAD 7-_ 10 _1.5'3 - - GRADE _ ELEV 10 OTHERWISE NOTED AND FREE OF ORGANIC DEI IF ORGANIC DEBRIS. a _ APPARENT HIGH WATER LINE(AHWL) 4.) STONES SHALL BE PLACED IN SUCH MANF IN SUCH MANNER AS TO CREATE A EVENLY ,c a 2 6 PROVIDE MIRAFl FW-404 GEOTEXTILE a h' _ 7 MIN. - ELEV.=3.3 GRADED MASS WITHOUT CAUSING DISPLACEMEN G DISPLACEMENT OF THE UNDERLYING MATERIALS. I- Y a THE FINISHED SURFACE SHOULD BE FREE OF - - ~ AND CLUSTERS OF LARGE STONES. D BE FREE OF POCKETS OF SMALLER STONES Q - a JES. G C, FILTER FABRIC OR EQUIVALENT(TYPJ -f_!Z ARMOR LAYER 6 N R LESS THAN WEIGHT DIMENSION PROVIDE 4' DIA. CRUSHED 1 PRONDE ROCKS (1 TON MIN.) _ 5.) ALL DISTURBED GRASS AREAS OUTSIDE OF AS OUTSIDE OF RIPRAP REVETMENT TO BE n °m BY WEIGHT LES FT. STONE FILTER LAYER _ 1.0'3 PLACED INTO EXISTING GRADE 4 LOAMED AND SEEDED. 0(MIN.) 675 1.33 q AS WAVE ENERGY DISSIPATERS. m ° i U mU ° 15 1250 1.97 2 F o 0 o w U Z Z W 50 3130 2.67 2 05 6140 3.34 Y U 1100 (MAX.) 12520 4.23 D LEGEN O O vi e w ~ tl m 0 ~ U U Li DATUM ELEV I LEGEND O w 2 p 0.00 PROPERTY LINE - DATE: JUNE 14 2013 m m ABUTTERS LINE - o O N m M EXISTING CONTOUR - SCALE: AS NOTED M m BRUSH LINE PROJECT 2013805 0+00 0+50 0+85 NOW OR FORMERLY N/F SECTION 1 BOUNDARY POINT QUALITY CONTROL CERTIFICATION IMAGE VIEW K SHEET GROUP REVIEWED DATE ' 5' 2.5' 0 5' 1 OF 1 PROJECT MANAGER SURVEY GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ENVIRONMENTAL CIVIL /