Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-19.-1-7.6 pF so OFFICE LOCATION: O�� y0�" MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex O P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) H Southold, NY 11971r-_ Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 0U01 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Jim King, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: August 19, 2013 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review for LATHAM FAMILY FARM SCTM# 1000-19-1-7.6 L.K. McLean Associates, PC on behalf of LATHAM FAMILY FARM requests a Wetland Permit for a Ten (10) Year Maintenance Permit to remove woody vegetation along the unaffected sections of the berms while removing existing vegetation along the areas to be rehabilitated; the dikes will be enhanced or strengthened by the use of geosynthetic grids and erosion control materials; native vegetation will be added to provide erosion and sediment control; placement of any supplemental fill required in areas that were subject to settlement; establish a material staging area and clearly defined access roadways to repair the approximately 1,340 linear feet of damaged levee sections of an existing approximately 2,000 linear foot dike; all construction shall be performed in accordance with NRCS's (USDA) dike construction standards and specifications. Located: 29830 Route 25, Orient. SCTM# 19-1-7.6 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided to this department as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is EXEMPT from LWRP review pursuant to: § 268-3. Definitions. MINOR ACTIONS item "B" which states: B. Replacement, rehabilitation or reconstruction of a structure or facility, in kind, on the same site (inplace), including upgrading buildings to meet building or fire codes, except for structures in areas designated by the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area (CEHA) law where structures may not be replaced, rehabilitated or reconstructed without a permit and shoreline erosion control structures (including, but not limited to, groins, jetties, bulkheads, filled piers) located within Great Peconic Bay, Cutchogue Harbor, Little Peconic Bay, Hog Neck Bay, Noyack Bay, Southold Bay, Shelter Island Sound, Pipes Cove, Orient Harbor, Gardiners Bay, Long Island Sound, Fishers Island Sound and Block Island Sound (excluding all creeks); The proposed action(s) are not located within the CEHA. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney Town of Southold LWRP CONSVMCV ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits' inchx i% Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that aro subject to the Town of Southold Watefron:Consiskacy Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in malting a determination of coadstmcy. 'Except minor anew actions hwhd ig Building Pernub and othermhdaterial permhs rent located within the Coat Erasion HawrdArea. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the prepata of this firm should review the exempt minor action list,policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A mrux*W action will be ovabaw as to its sigma beneficial and adverse effiects upon the coastal area(which incudes all of Soutlwld Town), 3. If any question in Section C on this form is ansvvered'W'or"no",thea the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the cort9at nq review law. Thm each answer asnst be L detafi,lledust hells s0000rthm and now If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards sW conditions,it shall not be undertaken A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places:online at the To ' website(southokkam .northfork.nst),the Board of Trustees Office,the P J .E local libraries sad the Town Clerk's office. l� I B. DESCRwnON OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION J U L 2 9 2013 i SCTMN 1000 _ 19 01 -a, 7. k PROJECT NAME Latham Family Farm Dike Rehabilitation o 'ect $oath id Town Tr The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response). Town Board ❑ Planing Beard❑ Duadiog Dept. ❑ Board of Trustees 0 1. Category of Town of Southold agerwy scion(check appropriate[espouse): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e g.capital ❑x X04 planning activity,agency regaw, �,lerml u� ❑ (b) Financial assistance(e.g.grant,loan'subsidy) AUG - 92013 (c) Permit.approval,licence,cerhficetion: I ❑ Nauae and extent To participate in a program by the NRCS (USDA) to rehabilitate and enhance earthen berms (dikes) damaged by Super Storm Sandy (Oct ' 12 In accordance with NRCS Dike Standards and permit conditions by the Town Trustees, NYSDEC and USACOE. The action also includes the removal [ of woody growth from the damaged and undamaged sections of the containment structure to prevent future failure of the dike system. Town ofSoutholrl Dike Rehabilitation Proieet Proieet Description: After Superstorm Sandy hit Long Island's coast, four and a half miles of levees (dikes or earthen berms) in Cutchogue and Orient were damaged. The dikes were severely breached and/or topped in several spots and destabilized the entire system. The tidal surge associated with the storm damaged many acres of land used for agricultural purposes for the past 100 years. These earthen berms are important pieces of infrastructure that protect five farms including Salt Air Farm, Latham Farm, Driftwood Farm, Terry Farm and Wickham Fruit Farm as well as over 700 acres of farmland from flooding. Each farm is protected by a separate dike and approximately 3,500 linear feet was damaged. The levees protect the Peconic Bay from agricultural run-off and avert saltwater intrusion to fresh water wetlands. The estimated cost to repair the dikes is currently estimated at$1.4 million. Suffolk County applied for EWP funding; however, guidelines suggest that funding should only be provided for freshwater projects. This project was provided a waiver by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and has the ability to access this funding (75% of the overall project cost). The local township, Southold Town, has agreed to be the sponsor of the dike rehabilitation project for the local farm owners. Four eligible farms have agreed to participate in the program sponsored by the National Resources Conservation Service (Division of the USDA). The project will require permitting (NYSDE('. Southold 70wn Trustees and the USACOE) and subsequent development of construction drawings and specifications (bid package) for a public bid process. The construction documents will define the manner in which the earthen berms will be rehabilitated and/or enhanced to withstand future tidal surges. Most ofthe damaged areas were caused by mature vegetation (trees) that was damaged by the heavy winds. When trees were blown over by the historic storm it caused significant disturbance to the protective structure when the root systems were unearthed. The project will involve developing a maintenance program to remove woody vegetation along the unaffected sections of the berms while removing existing vegetation along the areas to be rehabilitated. File dikes will be enhanced or strengthened by the use of geosynthetic grids and erosion control materials. Native vegetation will be proposed to provide erosion and sediment control. During construction each site will have a material staging area and clearly defined access roadways to repair the damaged levee sections. All construction shall be pertiirmed in accordance with NRCS's dike construction standards and in a manner consistent with anv conditions of environmental permits obtained for the project. Construction is expected to commence in the fall of 2013. The ro osed work at each eh farm consims ofthe following: , Name of Farm Damaged Dike Area Un-Damp ed Dike Area Total Area Salt Air Farm 90,854 SF / 1',17 IT 27,090 SF/ 774 LF 117,944 SF /3,091 LF Latham Farm 54,000 SF/ 1.340 LF 26,400 SF/ 660 LF 80.400 SF/ 2,000 Lf- Wickham FWickham Farm 49,700 SF/ 1.530 LP 51,800 SF i 1,480 LF 101,500 SF/3.010 LF Y Terry Farm 25,50(1 SI: / 850 LI 0 SF / 0 LF 25S00 SF / 850 LF The damaged and un-damaged dike areas shall be included in a 10-year maintenance permit required to remove any woody vegetation from growing once the dikes are either rehabilitated/enhanced or when the undamaged areas are initially cleared. The maintenance permit will also allow for the placement of any supplemental fill required in areas that were subject to settlement. Any areas that require erosion and sediment control shall be vegetated in accordance with the specified planting schedule (100% native). Locationofac(ion• 31800 Main Road Orient NY 11957 site screw: present land use; Agricultural Present zoningclassiScs". Agricultural Conservation (AC) 2. If an application for the proposed action hes been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name ofapplicaat: Dan Latham (b) Moiling : 31800 Main Road Orient NY 11957 (c) Telephone number:Arra Code( ) 631-323-3701 (d) Application number,if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency? yes 0 No❑ Ifyckwhich state orfedealagency? Natural Resources Conservation Service USDA C. Evaluate the project to the following polidea by anatyziog how the project will farther support or net support the pelieles. Provide all proposed Beet Management Practices that will further each polky. hrcomplete answers will requim that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Polley 1. Foss a pattern of development In the Town of Southold that enhance;community character, preserves open space,makes eBideat use of loh=hndare,makes beadidd ase of a coastal lontlea,and midmb:m adverse effects of development See LWRP Section III—Policies;Page 2 for evatoation asteria. [!]Ya 0 No Q Not Applicable Please refer to Permit Drawings that define the oroiect scone. construction details and Quantifies the projertIR pronosed features. Much addkional dkwu if necesa ry Policy 2. Protect and preserve histork said arehaeologicd resoar'ces of the Tewa of Southold. See LWRP Section M—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluatlon wheris ❑% Yes ❑ No❑ Not Applicable The Latham Family Farm has been farmed for over one hundred years. Mach addWang sham diary Polley 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Sonthold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Q Yea ❑ No❑ Not Applicable Thp Town of Orn thnl d rnntai ns n vari pt,y of ani rn.p and hpanti ful Scenic, agriculture, Me strongest visual element in Southold. Aawh adMmd aheeb if neceawy NATURAL COAST POLICIES i Policy 4. Minimin less of W structures,and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages g through 16 for evaluation criteria Yea ❑ No❑ Not Applicable i The erosion and sediment control structures are these berms that have existing naturally since the late 1930' s to early 1940'x. They serve a valuable function to preserving the farmland landward of the earthen berms/dikes. The program will maintain and/or enhance these structuresproperly so as to provide protection while not adversely affecting soil erosion or the migration of soil into waterways. t Aawl eddhimW dweb if oocebery Paley S. Protect and hapreve water quality and supply to the Town of.Southold.See LWRP Section III —PoWas Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria rM Yes ❑ No [:]Note To preserve the town' s farming blocks in order to protect farming n=pratinnR limit the nppc9 fnr additinnal drinking, water in thpsP areas, � _ id ual improve water quality that has been compromised by tidal flooding. Adwh sdffldmd sheen Ifnecenny Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems iadudig Significant Coastal Fish and WildNe Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III—Polices;Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yee No Not Applicable I Aaseh addi ind sheen if necenry Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Tows of Soutitold. See LWRP Section III— Policia Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yee ❑No❑X Not Applicable i i Aftch addidowl sheets if necaaasry Polity S. Minimise environmental degradation in Town of Southold from selid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section m—Policies;Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. [I Yes ❑ No E] Not Applicable i i PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide far pubes access too and recreational mis of,costal waters,public lands, and puhlic resources of the Tows of Southold. See LWRP Seedos III—Policies;Papa 38 through 46 for evaluatioo caster s. ❑ YeZI No 0 Not AppRuble Admb eddidaml sheets if necamy WORMG COAST POLICIES Polley 10. Protect Sootkold's water•depeadent use; and promote atting of new water-dependent am in saitable locations. See LWRP Section III Policies;Page 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No Q Not Applieable Attach addkiwal sheets if oweauy Polley 11. Promote sustainable we of 8viog mance resoureea is Long Idand Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters.See LWRP Section III—Polidee;Pages 57 through 62 for"nation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No® Not Appfleable Attach adMonel Aeft ifMcma y Polley 12. Protect agricultural bads to the Town of Southold. See LWRP Seca"III—Policia;Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ©Yes ❑ No❑ Not Applicable Protecting the remaining agricultural land in the Town of Southold F i a ri t ' l tri ri n uc tho Tn i �ilYnr=l Annnn c •ca emu g �i_errat:io^ o£ Tie =gr my, � pro3ect will ensure that the mitigative measures to re s l u e an enhance the Protective structures (dikes) . Attach addabed dmft ifaecessvy I Polfry 13. Promote approprhdo me and devdopmest of wergy and adaerd researca. See LWRP Seddon III—Polldes;Para 65 threagh 68 for evalaatba criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No O Not AppLeable I pREpARED gy Christopher F. Dwyer TITLE Associate DATE 7-25-13 `KAA an Associates, P.C. 437 South Country Road • Brookhaven • New York • 11719aNT D NSULTING ENGINEERS (631)286-8668 • FAX(631)286-6314 3 Associates EUGENE F.DALY,P.E.,P.T.O.E.-.PRESIDENT and C.E.O. CHRISTOPHER F.DWYER RAYMOND G.DIBIASE,P.E.,P.T.O.E.^' PTP-,EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDROBERT A STEELE,P.E. DANIEL P.JEDLICKA,P.L.S.,VICE PRESIDENT JAMFS L.DeKONING,P.E. STEVEN W.EISENBERG,P.E. ANDREW B.SPEISER July 26, 2013 Town of Southold Trustees Office 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 ORIGINAL Southold,N.Y. 11971 Attention: James F. King-Board of Trustees President Re: Town of Southold: Dike Rehabilitation Program by NRCS(Four East=End Farms) Administrative Permit Application -Terry, Latham,Wickham and Heston Farms LKMA Project#: 13050.000 Dear Mr. King: Pursuant to a field meeting held on July 16, 2013 with your office and Rob Marsh of the NYSDEC (Region 1), L.K. McLean Associates has prepared the attached permit packages associated with the Dike Rehabilitation Projects at the two (2) farm properties in Cutchogue (Wickham and Salt Air) and the two (2) farm properties in Orient(Terry and Latham). One original permit package and one copy have been included for your office's review. The final construction drawings will be completed within the next couple of weeks. Since the Town and the Natural resources Conservation Service (NRCS) anticipates construction to start in the fall of 2013. The permit would be to allow the rehabilitation of the berms compromised during Super Storm Sandy and to remove woody vegetation from the damaged and undamaged sections of the dike system. Removal of large trees that populate the earthen berms would minimize the risk of the dike system's failure during future storm events. The integrity of the dike system will protect the farmland from being destroyed by salt water from the tidal waters while minimizing any soil erosion and sediment migration into the waterways from the farmlands and dike system. Our office understands that the Trustees Office has waived all fees on this project due to their relationship to Super Storm Sandy. We consider this project to be agricultural maintenance (no structure) which disturbs less than five(5)acres and have included erosion and sediment controls with the permit drawings for each site(as per SPDES GP-0-10-001,Tables 1 &2 of Appendix B). Enclosed you will find the following components of the permit packages submitted for your consideration (one original and one copy): • Heston Farm(Salt Air)Permit Application&Permit Drawings(includes Photos) • Wickham Fruit Farm Permit Application&Permit Drawings(includes Photos) • Terry Family Farm Permit Application&Permit Drawings (includes Photos) • Latham Family Farm Permit Application& Permit Drawings (includes Photos) • Founded in 1950 LIMAL. K. McLean Associates, P.C. Thank you for your time in reviewing this application. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, CFD:cfd Christopher F. Dwyer, Associate Enc. (4) L. K. McLean Associate,P.C. CC: James Richter RA,Town of Southold Engineering Department w/enc. (All) Prudence Heston, Salt Air Farm w/enc. (Heston Application Only) Tom Wickham, Wickham Fruit Farm w/enc. (Wickham Application Only) Fred Terry,Terry Family Farm w/enc. (Terry Application Only) Dan Latham, Latham Family Farm w/enc. (Latham Application Only) LKMA File Copy w/enc. (All) ✓ �— � vv Guo ,... � ,,.,x I /.✓ J 7 A ✓ �. —_- ,. man , , 71 it l O \ W 1 AM 41 21 ^n ayy „x f't ' i \ � 1 ,I J ' I w .�.�� xona COUNTY XSUFFO © a wvngL➢ secmxxo 19 .� Ma s ... —_— � __•__ err--�-- _ � ® o ,Yo .T; Wm ('FD 0 < SEC S1 \ i n �n S TpN 'al Mol,I ix swm'o4Mv `r - 28 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LATHAM FARM - DIKE REHABILITATION PROJECT LATHAM FARM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DRAWING LIST 1 . COVER/LOCATION MAP 2. SITE ACCESS PLAN ORIENT 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS SOUTH POINT 4 . EXISTING CONDITIONS WEST nr: 5. PROPOSED SITE PLAN SOUTH �F *° 6. PROPOSED SITE PLAN WEST 7. PROPOSED SECTION VIEWS mt; " ua L 8. PROPOSED SECTION VIEWS 9 . PROPOSED SECTION VIEWS 4 10. DETAILS 1 )11%11 � SITE 11 . DETAILS 2 12. DETAILS 3 L❑CATI❑N ?SAY s a n 0 SUFFOLK COUNTY REAL PROPERTY TAX_ b MAP INFORMATION U DISTRICT: 1000 SECTION: 019 BLOCK: 01 LOT: 7.6 w SITE MAP LOCATION MAP E 4 SCALE: 1" = 250' N.T.S. E DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY 0 E C E I V E REvisioNs TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SITE DATA TABLE JUL 2 9 2013 SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK Wn �R DIKE REHABILITATION PROJECT Dike Rehabilitation Project - Site Data Table AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE OVERALL LENGTH r SITE LOCATION TOV WI�TIi TOP HEIGHT SLOPE LENGTH suRvevEo LATHAM FARM - LOCATION MAP O _ a� LATHAM FARM SOUTH 49 I I 8 0.620 620 o LATHAM FARM EAST Jv y 0.6 2so zso L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. CONSULTING ENGINEERS X37 SOUTH COUNTRY RD., BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK 11719 3 LATHAM FARM WLST d5 9 8 0.4 1000 337 1 Designed By: CFD scale: AS NOTED sneer No. 00 0o Drawn By: PFT Date: JULY 2013 M Approved By: CFD/RGD File No. 13050.000 d o mo' zoo' . 9 k ..,? z 41gg4 • Y tr .tl r 4 4p 1� 'j, EQ d b 4 q• prPm, A + y s rill, k �i� �T4 t , , r W`"yn L ;" h . xP a 4 }ti j, `-, � .• �, • . ' i ' t11� t J4 R lr VOR�"tt"i >wt ` aP-1 � t LOCATION MAP , r "" bb NOTTO SCALE n " 333 ✓,,,}J= yam. I 'L y{ a d: i 4 A .Y... .. w.. , i � a�R.•�Y`.h'C t .y z t P. 0 4 H F a N N U Q d v e Ai N� n iu O e yip • R ' u ; 0 E 0 E _ o a.. t 0 J C q ILII DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY y REVISIONS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY DIKE REHABILITATION ACCESS PLAN - LATHAM FARM (SOUTH) E w• AT ORIENT 0 ; A L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. to A III r CONSULTING ENGINEERS 437 SOUTH COUNTRY RD., BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK 11719 o A Designed By: CFD Scale: AS NOTED sheet No. 00 oDrawn By: LMY�PFT Date: JUNE, 2013n N 0 Approved By: RGD Fle No. 13050.000 1 / n Creeks ' 30 0 30 60 Tidal I Creek SCALE IN FEET / S�v 6,6 NOTES: 1. ELEVATIONS SHOWN REFERENCE NAVD 1988. Fry ; r I M« d 2. SITE TOPOGRAPHIC DATA COLLECTION IN JUNE 2013 O II l� Lk:; C119.a aII ^i sf r'S:. tl ss II , A J 0 �Juq'IYeo9 Paa1x9LS SLF79 NoI PVoa ' dlw Eatst9ncsdev, Bersc. I I„ \� lr)I- 3�9-;?0 "3 ia,�3Sr;7..19 "t 7 ; CBAveragr e5 9 Xer< Xe65r /r%rj9s / o xr se 'EL-20 . o II hall j.��it'R211'Jj i NfR:Si 1 h �I i ,I \ X262 �.,u� i•g 1' I o xx,,a31 obi, I N 11 n 1 -Long X I 19, I, / xase xan Xaa` / ro s5 ' / / Beach Bayes Y.1.� XB %A55/ %ei d2 / NdA3 xL5 %leg%ar6 %l63\ 05�5 %033 � %e/b 16H' / N Xa66 / L Q 1,099 / x/659/ %L zla3 /, flu / /�/ // • `/ 9 / ii X9.93/ O %Ub 990 997 3 asa SC Ui -� Z \ Xln led / \ V / X9%J U. / 1.51 Z F � / XL99 / / 6 NJ w,// Xdiu9.6]i ,X343 Longue o ��' / E / . ho. i 7m / Beach A a %rhe w `/ h / \`'9 Bay 0 .711 / sl o �'YN��1 / zrsa rl / /• � l E (I W5.9 A.c,, NIF Latham Farros Proporty LP (8- Suflolk 'dd // o ` Co. Dovelou ien�' i� �r� ''") �/-,es xeod _ / / / DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY 511PX.li'L9� ��F9'6La ,., r, �,r x,�r xald - i 9 // .x q,n / R d9, �� 7 5 / /kyo• REVISIONS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD / u?� 373 SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY -ae6X"'X937 DIKE REHABILITATION w v �' ra6v � Xdta �/ g, s1s� � � zdea � .119 v %l/� -��` oe,e.r q+5p 00 av x6u i / P S w dg+50 00 LATHAM FARM (SOUTH) 00 —a+oo. d6 d �� �z EXISTING CONDITIONS E o _ %3d, - - Xe d xa� Q 0 0 / X1o3 x3]n - xrj, X", -V :ra L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 137 SOUTH COUNTRY RD., BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK 11719 M Designed By: CFDScale: AS NOTED Sheet No, 0'•es.' ....�Y.�. 1 a''�Y " 'x aJ1 Yi o Drawn By: LMY Date: JUNE, 2013 3 _N M Approved By: RGD File No. 13050.000 a %305 7 X \OJ \\ 99 226 \ \ .1292 %(93 y — \\ O 596%SPP \ V\ %156 %6, U2 \\ 5971 %YJO \ 46 V \ A A \ %OJI \ 'AU'3� y{j� Long X" Beach ,4 o , x>q90 O A 1. a3 da�,.� i i r� A O f.e)YuPGa`13 d>Q@WTfB I \ an \ Bay I est ra z ^V�^o8hsia40 � e' , C c lf^ s 3Sr)71 L.'I 7 pUCv003 Iv 9 3.1f7 C.. d DI x LGA ' X939 A it 301 960D1,=1 009 \\ . ° �Tidal J�_ -31 ,3 '159 14'i31tii - v06 toGOD'IFI . %5°" � LI ' '31192919 9/1 14514 iO3.8d 2i.9n CklGODSEi 2a, xs \ Creek o � \ %11 \ %, \ \ \%9h7 A �\ x522 5\- 20 0 20 40 (n A x2.69A ( 6Q \ o y \\ %060 TTTo \ \ SCALE IN FEET z p k5 0 \ NOTES: 1. ELEVATIONS SHOWN REFERENCE NAVD 1988. ��^ \ 2 SITE TOPOGRAPHIC DATA COLLECTION IN JUNE 2013 . i O \ x1,29 ( xe,i� \ \ V V A %H07A%930 WX"n I 7777-22Y � I I X77 E l %v.s9 r9c� x7,6\ O I o ° I% 194 I k \ DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY %]96� \\ I gxas REVISIONS X 7 68 I d TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY \ L eJe92 LATHAM FARM (WEST) 65'5320 DIKE REHABILITATION S it x 199 a a6 075 E ° EXISTING CONDITIONS N CR 0 0 3 CONSULTING G SoCOUNTRY McLEAN ASSOCIATES,OR ATES OKHAVEN, NEW YP_C. K 11719 1 0 r2 ov Designed By: CFD scale: AS NOTED Sheet No. 00 N O Drawn Hy: LMY Dote; JULY 2013 N M Approved By: RGD File No. 13050.000 4 j a 60fr / %26 Creek S<.x 3 20 0 20 40 , Tidal s SCALE IN FEET 55➢ ' / Creek 00 1 1., x446 NOTES: �'� 1. ELEVATIONS SHOWN REFERENCE NAVD 1988. 2. SITE TOPOGRAPHIC DATA COLLECTION IN JUNE 2013 I <, "I >i:�i2 fs V1,h ns9l;i dp li, 18 II SL�19 19 ? l3A,((,hive s . i „ x . ., ,asd''.11tri1 X,,t2 § 1 L-20 I I \ X-9,92 --- Lf e bit ) x,Q3 X � I �- -Long FILL APPROX 1850 CY xa69 xl 1045 I' I / Beach Bay Yi55/ 9,9P / %95L jj x199%116 X1,63\ i OS 5 %033 p i / '�os3xXe,6 x/ Ip Xy5 R<r7X \S // 9,13/M 56 / g 941 %1. 1.99 CrV% / <y %1]0 df/ 196 %261 61 J d X1,61 o � 7 '� Long Beach X162 // / g s T: �.2 Bay LoWT r, NlIFLatham Far1136 Property LP (.1Y". SIiffolk {-C °.;y DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY _ i , x� X , / g � ,¢<,], � �/ REVISIONS RicTht;yj ,fc7� x:.9 6k / TOWN OF SOUTHOLD /Y1]9 9" SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY j _ DIKE REHABILITATION'96y� 6 %l,.J- %l,e X9 X �y LATHAM FARM (SOUTH) PROPOSED SITE PLAN / QGS� 10 Xe1 r 9 )P X017 L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 137 SOUTH COUNTRY RD.. BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK 11719 Designed B CFD AS NOTED Sheet No. 9 Scale: +y[ Drawn By: LMY Date: JUNE, 2013 ) 5 j Approved By: RGD File No. 13050.000 1 x3as Gj 67 s� 20 0 20 40 X i 1 - o ss, \ SCALE IN FEET -- 9i60 _i: „�� ;-,'>.;h iti,3n`� i,� . ,, Id,\ A, _ - A' NOTES: r'n � 1. ELEVATIONS SHOWN REFERENCE NAVD 1988. \ \ pi6� 2. SITE TOPOGRAPHIC DATA COLLECTION IN JUNE 2013 . IN A A PROP. GRADE PROP. GRADE EX GRADE \ \ ' e, . e��.�� � ^ .s 01� 7n .e"�...*'.'A;� .tI 000Ex. GRADE 10 Long vvvv . v ,09 ;40 ?`� V�rk 910 10 10 ° F3II k#1 Beach ` ��, ko N [.cW47.6 ( 119.5 ) ��, ao ,,M9 ��tate, off' evf Yc i k 0 — 0 ° Bay 2 � I I 3 + 25 . 34 -10 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 -10 -10 e Nidal -10 0 10 20 30 40 _- \ V Creek \ cl9 \ \ FILL APPROX 300 CY k V \ r v,xa PROP. GRADE PROP. GRADE PROP. GRADE V EX. GRA6 \ X. GRADE EX. GRADE 1 0 `tid.e3 5� 10 DE 10 10 10 10 � �\ \ %0.60 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ 1 + 9 . 80 2 + 1 . 33 2 + 5 . 63 w -10 -10 - 10 -10 0 10 20 30 -20 -10 0 10 20 3010 -10 -10 0 10 20 -10 w g \ %d.]3 III A li 1111 i��I� V A o PROP. GRADE )I'I I Q_ PROP. GRADE PROP. GRADEII1111 II, III i11 ,AA EX. GRADE EX. GRADE I II I ,,I Illx_ ' 1 1 11 Ex. GRADE 10 10 1 151,0 Ill q�v v1 rn 10 10 10 10 1 i 1 xoyk9 1,1 I ` T C 1 X31 � I Ix 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 %dlb II I I I Q'9d9 'E 1 + 66 . 11 G_ 1 + 3 . 12 I x¢s, 1 + 0 . 20 -1030 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 -10 -10 _20 -10 0 10 20 30 -10 -10 _20 -10 0 10 20 -10 v I I \ . 1 \ \ 1 1 5]5 %L'N R.TO %Al2 36 O o PROP. GRADE J EX. GRADE o DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY 10 0 REVISIONS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY s 0 -- 0 DIKE REHABILITATION LATHAM FARM (WEST) 0 + 83 . 26 0 PROPOSED SITE PLAN -10 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 0 3 L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. 0 CONSULTING ENGINEERS 437 SOUTH COUNTRY RD., BROOKHAVEN. NEW YORK 11718 C West Berm Sections (10 Scale) Designed By: CFD Scale: AS NOTED sheet No. oDrcwn By: LMY Date: JULY 2013 G 6 M Approved By: RGD File No. 13050.000 a PROP. GRADE EX. GRADE 10 0 -10 3 + 64. 86 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 PROP. GRADE EX. GRADE 10 10 0 0 2 . 62 - 10 3 + -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 - 20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 -10 PROP. GRADE EX. GRADE 10 10 3 0 0 z Z 0 11 Z -10 To- 00 -90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -102 + 90 27 10 20 30 40 50 60 -10 Z S ROP. GRADE a IEX. GRADE N 20 20 20 20 0 0 a i 10 10 10 10 m i o, o p 0 0 p E `m D_ 2 + 2 . 44 2 + 65 . 86 -1090 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 3010 -10 -10 -110 -100 -90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 - 30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 E 0 V_ E 0 L O J C O o DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY a REVISIONS 10 10 1 NOTES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Y o SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY 1. ELEVATIONS SHOWN REFERENCE NAVD 1988. DIKE REHABILITATION v w 0 0 2. SITE TOPOGRAPHIC DATA COLLECTION IN JUNE 2013 . LATHAM FARM aN (SOUTH BERM) SECTIONS � o 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 + 9 . 09 -10 L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. 0 -10 �2 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 CONSULTING ENGINEERS 137 SOUTH COUNTRY RD., BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK 11719 0 o Designed By: CFD Scale: AS NOTED sheet No. N o East Berm Sections (10 Scale) Drawn By: LMY Date: JULY 2013 Approved By: RGD File No. 13050.000 a PROP. GRADE EX. GRADE 10 10 0 0 -10 5 + 3L . 67 —70 —60 —50 —40 — 30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 —10 EX. GRADE 10 0 5 + C1 . 12 —10 —70 —60 —50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10C PROP. GRADE EX. GRADE 10 o, 3 N 0 Z O F U W N 3 —10 —60 —50 —40 —30 —20 —104+ 0 7610 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 a w r 0 w N 0- PROP. GRADE 0 EX. GRADE NOTES: o- O 10 1. ELEVATIONS SHOWN REFERENCE NAVD 1988. i m 2. SITE TOPOGRAPHIC DATA COLLECTION IN JUNE 2013 . 3 0 o` 0 E a 4+ 1g 0 E —10 —50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 w E 0 s PROP. GRADE o EX. GRADE 0 DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY io REVISIONS 0 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD y SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY DIKE REHABILITATION 0 LATHAM FARM E no (SOUTH BERM) SECTIONS 0 30 10 10 - 0 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. I H CONSULTING ENGINEERS 437 SOUTH COUNTRY RD., BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK 77719 " o East Berm Sections (10 Scale) Designed B CFD AS NOTED Sheet No. 0 0 9 Y Scale: N O O N M Drawn By: LMY Date: JULY 2013 8 Approved By: RGD File No. 13050.000 a PROP. GRADE PROP. GRADE EX. GRADE EX. GRADE 10 11® 10 8 + 6 04 9 + C3 . 11 - . 30 -20 - 10 0 10 20 0030 -20 -10 0 10 20 38 PROP. GRADE EX. GRADE 10 10 PROP. GRADE PROP. GRADE EX. GRADE EX. GRADE 10 6 + 95 . 34 7 + 57 . 92 8 + 22 . 96 040 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 PROP. GRADE EX. GRADE 10 10 ajj 0 6 + 44. 33 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 75--8 0 90 100 0 NOTES: 20 2C 1, ELEVATIONS SHOWN REFERENCE NAVD 1988 PROP. GRADE 2. SITE TOPOGRAPHIC DATA COLLECTION IN JUNE 2013 . EX. GRADE 10 10 0 0 -10 6 + 1 . 46 -1 -90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1101 PROP. GRADE EX. GRADE DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY 10 1 (0 REVISIONS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY 0 0 DIKE REHABILITATION 5 + 8 9 3 LATHAM FARM -10 90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 10 (SOUTH BERM) SECTIONS L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. East Berm Sections (10 Scale) CONSULTING ENGINEERS 437 SOUTH COUNTRY RD., BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK 77719 Designed By: CFD Scale: AS NOTED Sheet No. Drawn By: LMY Date: JULY 2013 9 Approved By RGD File No. 13050.000 O FRESHWATER WETLAND HERBACEOUS SPECIES : WATER FOWL PROTECTION CANOPY (DTIDAL WETLAND HERBACEOUS SPECIES : • Hibiscus Moscheutos — Swam Rose Marsh FENCE WITH SILT FENCE Ammophilia Brevili ulata — American Beach rass • Juncus Roemerianus — Needlegross Rush OO A c OC Distichlis Spicata Spike Grass g • Spartina Cynosuroides — Big Cordgrass Spartina Alterniflora — Smotth Cordgrass • Typho Angustlfolla — Narrowleaf Cattail X 6" CCA CURB STAKED EVERY 5' WITH 18• $4 EPDXY COATED REBAR • Spartlno Patens — Salt Meadow Cordgrass COIR MAT 700 FRESHWATER SLOPE SEEDING BTIDAL SLOPE SEEDING MIX MIX WITH NURSE GRASS PROPOSED ACCESS ROADWAY WITH NURSE GRASS VARIES NORTH SIDE (FRESH WATER) AMMOPHRA BREVILIGULATA O RANDOM CLUMP PLANTINGS F COIR MAT 700 EL 0 SEE DETAIL "I- WATER FOWL PROTECTION CANOPY O ,°�/ \\//\\//\\�\\//\\//\\ i/ 20 ARMOR STONE REVENTMENi SOUTH SIDE (SALT WATER) FENCE WITH SILT FENCE A C y \ /\\/ \/ /\\/\\ / 1.0 WffH STONE FILL E F \\ /\\/%\ j\//\// //\\/ '"i, SEE DETAIL 'H' 2. 2.0 \\/\\/\/\\ 00 /\ /\\/\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\ / / / 16" PREMIUM COIR LOG W/ STAKES WATER FOWL PROTECTION, II'hi ) O \/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\ SEE DETAIL 'E" CANOPY FENCE k SILT FENCE /\\/\//\\/\/\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\/\\/\\/\/\/\\/\/\ \ _/ -EL 2.0 SEE DUAL •c- /1T� X/\\\r/\\/r�/\�i\�i`\ \/rr /rte/��/i\\/ri\\moi\\/r\\/�' EL ' •', \\/\\/\\/\\/\\\\\\\\/\\ >\/>\/`\\`//\\\f//\\/\\/\\y/\\\F//\\/\\/\\/\\/\\\\\/\\\\\\'\\\\\\\\\ y\\\/\\ , w:_h}:�`\�`r11O AMMOPHLLA BREVILIGUTALA EL. 0.0 �'"' \/\\\/\\ \\��� \/\\\ /\i \ \\\\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \ RANDOM CLUMP PIANTINIGS \\' \\ \\ \ %/��/n EXISTING BOTTOM OE 12• PREMIUM COIIR LOG WITH STAKES r d0 OF EXISTING GRADNUINR BOTTOM O SECTION` A—A RESTORATION ALTENIFLORA SEE DETAlu FABRIC PROPOSED RE-GRADING OF DIKE SEE DETMIL 'I" FRESHWATER HERBACEOUS SPECIES RESTORATION WATER FOWL PROTECTION CANOPY OO OO FENCE WITH SILT FENCED G " MIN ANGULAR STONE ACCESS B E ARMOR STONE REVETMENT WITH STONE COIR MAT 700 FILL AT TIDAL PIPE END BECTON TIDAL SLOPE SEEPING MIX FRESHWATER SLOPE SEEDING O PROPOSED ACCESS ROADWAY WITH NURSE GRASS MIX WITH NURSE GRASS VARIES EOGRIO OR APPROVED EQUAL) SLOPE RENFORCEMENT MATERIAL COIR MAT 700 // \/ \\\ /\ LAYERED ON 2'-0' INCREMENTS / / / / // / / / / `, RANDOM CLUMP PLANTINGS NORTH BIDE (FRESH WATER) O ` Drv;.\\\\// /%//\//\�\//\�\// /%// `S-{ SEE DETAIL 'I"O SOUTH SIDE (SALT WATER) 6" TOPSOIL N , 16" PREMIUM COIR LOG W/ STAKES • \/\/\/ \/\\/\/\/\ /\/\\/�\�/��\�/\\/\�/\ SEE DETAIL 'E' //\ \//�/\/\/\// / ///j'�/%'l////'///i/ O B FRESHWATER HERBACEOUS SPECIES /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ WATER FOWL PROTECTION CANOPY O // FENCE WITH SILT FENCERESTORATION \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ A C 3 \\//\// /\/i�/ /�\%\\ /\\%\\//\//\/i \\j/\\/7 w B \ �t\\\\\\�i\\\i/\\\/\\ //\/ � \\ APPROXIMATE HIGH WATER`,j;l Y,, .0 IIS O \\�\\�\\/\\/\`/\` % //a/�/i//,//,//� ///./ //, //. //.//.// // // EL z.o � '(', It 1{ I EXISTING BOTTOM oij f \ \\ \\/\\/\/\ \�j� \ \\ \\/\\ \\/\\/\\/"\ \\/' \n' �/\\\ % 74 \m/\//\/-\/� \/\\\\ \\ \\ \\ Tib 'i \\//\\•j//�/\�\�/////\\\�//////%/\\\\�//////\\\/////�/\\\\�//////�\\\\�//// //\ \\�\\/// qRIES UCTURAL FILL AS SPECIFIED \/\ / / /\/ % \// \//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\/ \///\\/\//\\//\\/ \/I\//�\///\\/\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\��\//\//\//�\//�\/��\//j\//j\//%\//\\/\\ O 12' PREMIUM COIR LOG WITH STAKES K \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \/�\/\\///\// L JEXISTING BOTTOM GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SECTION 8—p SEE DETAIL 'F PROPOSED RE-GRADING OF DIKE O 0 DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY Z REVISIONS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Y SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY o I DIKE REHABILITATION a L J EM DETAILS 1 � G 0 L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. .�-. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 437 SOUTH COUNTRY RD., BROOKHAVEN. NEW YORK 11719 M 00 Designed By: CFDScale; AS NOTED Sheet No. N O N o Drawn By: PFT Date: JULY 2013 10 n j Approved By: RGD File No. 13050.000 a STANDARD AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SILT FENCE SILT FENCE DETAILS TEMPORARY SILT FENCE WITH STRAW BALES WOVEN WIRE FENCE (MINIMUM 14-1/2 GAUGE, MAXIMUM 6" MESH SPEAKING) 5'-0" DEFINITION DESIGN CRITERIA (CONTINUED) Max c MAX WHERE ENDS OF FILTER CLOTH COME TOGETHER,THEY SHALL BE ENTER TO CENTER=10'-0" MESH REINFORCEMENT USED SE TOINTERCRARY PT ER SEDIMENT LADEN XTILE FABRIC(FILTER OVERLAPPED,FOLDED AND STAPLED TO PREVENT SEDIMENT BYPASS FILTER FABRIC USEDTO INTERCEPT SEDIMENT SOIL RUNOFF FROM SMALL SEE SILT FENCE DETAIL TIED TO MESH DRAINAGE AREAS OF DISTURBED SOIL 36" MIN FENCE POSTS, DRIVEN MIN 16" INTO REINFORCEMENT CRITERIA FOR SILT FENCE MATERIALS 4" GROUND 4" FENCE POST PURPOSE 1 SILT FENCE FABRIC THE FABRIC SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING T PACKED WITH EARTH FON CENTER SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE APPROPRIATE THE PURPOSE OF A SILT FENCE IS TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITY AND EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN APPROVAL AUTHORITY SUCH PROPOSED STRAW BALE DIKE EFFECT DEPOSITION OF TRANSPORTED SEDIMENT LOAD LIMITS APPROVAL SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE STATEWIDE ACCEPTANCE IMPOSED BY ULTRAVIOLET STABILITY OF THE FABRIC WILL DICTATE STATEWIDE ACCEPTABILITY SHALL DEPEND ON INFIELD ANDIOR THE MAXIMUM PERIOD THE SILTEVALUATIONSTOE-OF-SLOPE ENCE MAY BE USED. LABORATORY OBSERVATIONS AND EVALUATIONS HEIGHT OF FILTER FABRIC i6"ATIONS MINIMUM FLS MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE a GRADE FABRIC PROPERTIES VALUE TEST METHOD CONDITIONS WHERE PRACTICE APPLIES 8" MINIMUM „ GRAB TENSILE DO ASTM D1682 a a A SILT FENCE MAYBE USED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING STRENGTH(LBS) �Q� 1. MAXAELONGATION AT 50 ASTM MULURNBURST 1s0 ASTMD368s �� W . . QvQ� PERSQPEQCTIIVE VIEW FILTER FABRIC TO BE BURIED �— 6-� 18" CONDITIONS MAXIMUMALLOWABLE SLOPE LENGTHS CONTRIBUTING RUNOFF FAILURE PD) 1$" EXISTING GROUND TO A SILT FENCE ARE. IN GROUND, COST OF EXCAVATION SLOPE MAXIMUM SLOPE STRENGTH(PSI) INCLUDED IN THE PRICE STEEPNESS LENGTH ET) 21 50 PUNCTURE 40 ASTM D751 WOOD STAKE 31 75 STRENGTH(LBS) (MODIFIED) WOVEN WIRE FENCE (MINIMUM 14-112 41 125 SLURRY Flow RATE D,3 GAUGE, MAXIMUM 6" MESH SPACING)WITH 51 175FLATTER THAN 5.1 200 (GAUMINISF) FILTER CLOTH OVER ELEVATION VIEW 2. MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA FOR OVERLAND FLOW TO A SILT EQUIVALENT OPENING 40-80 US STD SIEVE FENCE SHALL NOT EXCEED ill ACRE PER 1 DO FEET OF FENCE SIZE CW02215 AND 20' MINIMUM SILT FENCE TYP. ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION 90 ASTM G 2 3 EROSION WOULD OCCUR IN THE FORM OF SHEET EROSION AND STABILITY I%) COMPACTED SOIL /` UNDISTURBED GROUND 5'-0" 4 THERE IS No CONCENTRATION OF WATER FLOWING TO THE 2.FENCE POSTS(FOR FABRICATED UNITS) THE LENGTH SHALL BE A FLOW / MAX BARRIER MINIMUM OF36 INCHES LONG WOOD POSTS WILL BE OF SOUND QUALITY HARDWOOD WITH A MINIMUM CROSS SECTION AREA OF 30 SQUARE INCHES. STEEL POSTS WILL BE STANDARD T AND U SECTION WEIGHING NOT LESS THAN ICA POUND PER LINEAR FOOT 16' MINIMUM FLOW - DESIGN CRITERIA 3 WIRE FENCE(FOR FABRICATED UNITS).WIRE FENCING SHALL BE A SILT FENCE SECTION LU - DESIGNCOMPUTATIONSARENOTREQUIRED ALL SILT FENCES SHALL MINIMUM I4-112 GAGE WITH A MAXIMUM 6 INCH MESH OPENING,ORAS EMBED FILTER CLOTH MINIMUM 6" 0_ APPROVED NOT TO SCALE O /--- STRAW BALES BE 1GNCOMPCLOSETSTHEAREAAS EQPOSSIBLE,ANDTHE FENCESA INTO GROUND —1 SEDIMENT BELOW THE FENCE MUST BE UNDISTURBED OR STABILIZED. 4 PREFABRICATED UNITS ENVIROFENCE OR APPROVED EQUAL MAY BE CONSTRUCTION NOTES FOR FABRICATED SILT FENCE STAKED & BUTTED A DETAIL OF THE SILT FENCE SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PLAIN,AND USED IN LIEU OF THE ABOVE METHOD PROVIDING THE UNIT IS INSTALLED SLOPE LL CONTAINMENT - CONTAINTHEFOLLOWINGMINIMUMREQUIREMENTS AS PER DETAILS 1 WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO FENCE POSTS POST. STEEL EITHER'T'OR'U'TYPE 7 0 \\\���'''ppp'''REA END TO END WITH WIRE TIES OR STAPLES OR2"HARDWOOD LU 1 THE TYPE,SIZE,AND SPACING OF FENCE POSTS 0 6" 2 THE SIZE OF WOVEN WIRE SUPPORTS FENCES 2 FILTER CLOTH TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WIRE FENCE FENCE' WOVEN WIRE, 14-1/2 GAGE,fi" "'' "' - WITH TIES SPACED EVERY 24"AT TOP AND MID SECTION MAX MESH OPENING 2 2" X 2" X T STAKES 3, THE TYPE OF FILTER CLOTH USED PER BALE 3, WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER THEY FILTER CLOTH' FILTER X, MIRAFI 100X, El 4 THE METHOD OF ANCHORING THE FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE OVERLAPPED EV SIX INCHES AND FOLDED STABILINKA T140N OR 5 THE METHOD OF FASTENING THE FILTER CLOTH TO THE 4 MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED AND MATERIAL APPROVED EQUAL. PLAN VIEW FENCING SUPPORT REMOVED WHEN "BULGES"DEVELOP IN THE SILT FENCE PREFABRICATED UNIT. SEOFAB FNVIRCFENCE, OR APPROVED EQUAL STRUCTURAL FILL AS SPECIFIED 6' TOPSOIL TO SUPPORT VEGETATION (SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN 18' CORRUGATED HDPE PIPE VARIES 6- MIN, ANGULAR STONE ACCESS (SEE SITE PLAN FOR 6' X 6' CCA CURB STAKED EVERY 5' WITH 18' #4 EPDXY COATED REBAR LOCATION) GEUGRID COR APPRUVED EQUAL) / � SLOPE REINFORCEMENT MATERIAL ONE–WAY RUBBER CHECK VALVE , /\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\V�� /\////\///////\//\//�////\//\//�1� LAYERED ON 2'-0' INCREMENTS INSTALLED INSIDE PIPE ('CHECKMATE ELAETOMERIC CHECK VALVE OR APPROVED EQUAL) VARIES /\//\// /\//\//\//\//\//\//\ i 6'-12' DIA. RIP RAP STONE ,/j\\ \\�\\�\\/\\\�\\�\\4\\\�\\�\\�\�\\\\\�\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/\\�\'��� HDPE FLARED AROUND PIPE ENDS 4%j�/j\//j�/jv/j�/j�/j�//��/j\//j\///\\/j���/j\/j\/�//\�/j�/\�/j\/j�/j\/ ij'�,,_ END SECTION ALL RIP RAP STONE TO BE INSTALLED ON 12 OZ. APPROXIMATE HIGH WATER FRESH WATER \ SALT WATER WOVEN FILTER FABRIC \ \//\/\// \ \// \^\\\/// \f ii DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY .,ri/i/./.i/•/•//`Y/`Yf?/,N/`%/` / \%/\%/\\���/\��/\�/\\�/�%\\%\\�/ \\�%\�%\�/\\\/ '\ \ii\\%\\%\\ \\%\\%\\ \\%\\i\\%\%�%��%\�j\1%\%\j\`\ _ --- _ '- :- REVISIONS TOWN OF S 0 U T H 0 LD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY SECTION C — C DIKE REHABILITATION TIDAL RELIEF PIPE DETAILS (TYP) L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 437 SOUTH COUNTRY RD., BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK 11719 Designed By: CFD Scale: AS NOTED Sheet No. Drawn By; PFT Date: JULY 2013 Approved By: ROD File No. 13050.000 OSILT FENCE DETAIL AND STRAW BALE © FRESHWATER SLOPE DETAIL: © WATERFOWL CANOPY FENCE: DETAIL: A. SLOPE DETAIL A. ENCLOSURE FENCE A. SILT FENCE DETAIL B. FRESHWATER SLOPE SEEDING MIX B. CANOPY FENCE B. STRAW BALE DETAIL LH (SEE NDTE 8) - - - - -- - POST ��----- /� EXISTING WETLAND BOTTOM UPLAND SLOPE SEEDING MIXTURE MESH RE:SARY) MENT [ '\ LIMITS OF PAYMENT IIF NECESSARY) �; � (3 �- __ r - I SILT FENCE GEOTEXTILE - \EE 'FEET i FOR SPECIE$ AND EE LFlNDSCA P`L pE VEL OPMENT SILT FENCE ASSEMBLY) T-(iYPm COLORED 57RING J PLANT SrACING r. HARDWOOD STAKES 2 1.5m 1.5m 1.5m HT, X 2 / V OF_ 1! SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT AREA -- FSET _ ` \ 104" MIN. (SEE NOTE 11 / I 2' MIN. -4' MAX. / ITT - STORM DEPTH � ;� I —TOE OF SLOPE 50mm / � ^ m FLOW -EXISTING GROUND ^ w B^ TOPSOIL Om �•-' % ' ��� \ j;/ / h<„`� MEAN HIGH WATER - FRESH WATER AND TIDAL MARSH IT _ �-RETAIN EXISTING =1� /^ m B VEGETATION, / COMPACTED SUB-GRADE I7.bm 1 1^ ( I j m 9 - M MAX I IF POSSIBLE I 3 3 w I', I � ��� - � 4d `.�0.' 'i'i�--' // DEPTH i ( 1 A,rE �I 1 EXCAVATE TRENCH. BURY SILT FENCE FABflIC� "` AND BACKFILL/COMPACT EXCAVATED EARTH GEOTEXTILE SURVEY FACE- I, APE-- / EDGE OF PROPOSED (TY 0.5m (TYP.I FROM EDGL OF PLANTING BED - SEE NOTES L_ � N N TCT' SECTION - SILT FENCE - TEMPORARY / = 3.28 Ft ADDITIONAL BALES PLACED TO LIMIT DRAINAGE AREA (SEE NOTE 7) 9EGETA�Ep WETLANDS 1.0 M DETAIL COMPACTED SUB-GRADE AND LIMIT MAXIMUM SLOPE LENGTH (SEE NOTE B) WATERFOWL ENCLOSURE FENCE NOT TO SCALE r \�LH (SEE NOTE Bl TYPICAL WETLAND SECTION SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT AREA NOT TO SCALE mmm SO z li3 m /— MIN. (SEE NOTE 1) SG mm X 3.0 m NOTCH TYP, WOOD STAKE �---RADIAL SIRINGS 2 i HIGH POINT , — INTERMEDIATE POST L.LA �4 SEE NOTE 'I E E P-13 mm 14" (TYP.) —WOOD STAKES — N SO mm X 3.0m M / TrP. \ POST CENTERED INSURVEY SEE DETAIL as BALE AND DRIVEN su 150 TO E FLUSH 150 �YVlPS ",--TOE OF SLOPE / F �— sD m LO _ j' o e w00D STAKE sTaKE W 2 Or, STRING TYP.— B M F_` DETAIL AA NOTCH STAKE FOR a CLOTH STRING � � PLAN7 MATCP. A ART TO Sou[ —RETAIN EXISTING E VEGETATION, ' - — -- IF POSSIBLE GENERAL NOTES j 1. SILT FENCE OR STRAWBALE DIKE SHALL BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 10'-0" FROM TOE Of ;Ee DETAIL UB-- SLOPE, TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE AREA FOR SEDIMENT STORAGE AND FACILITATE MAINTENANCE N OF SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT AREA. Posi sPaN NOTE: 3 MIa X, 10.0 METERS I. INTERMEDIATE POST IG REQUIRED IF SPAN LENGHT DETAIL BB SECTION /4 /, Y2 r 1/z FM4 RADIAL STRINGS ARE GFEATER THAN 22 METERS. NOTCH STAKE FOR STRAWBALE DIKE - TEMPORARY 2. POSTS MAY . 1 X 1 THE HARDWOOD, 1 X 3 (MIN.) SOFTWOOD OR 1.3 LD/FT CLOTH STRING (MIN.) STEEL. SPACING FOR THE PROVIDED SILT FENCE SHALL BE AS DESIGNATED ON THE DETAIL GROUND BARRIER ELEVATION E DEPARTMENT APPROVED LIST FOR SILT FENCE. WATERFOWL ENCLOSURE FENCE WT m St., 3. BALES FOR DIKE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH CUT ENDS VERTICAL, AND BALES BURIED A Norroswc w APPLICATION NOTES MINIMUM OF 4". NOTE: 1.0 M = 3.28 Ft E A. THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF A SILT FENCE OR STRAWBALE DIKE IS TO REDUCE 4. THE BOTTOM EDGE of SILT FENCE SHALL 8E BURIED A MINIMUM Of s" BELOW GROUND. THE FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE POSTS ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF RUNOFF VELOCITY AND TRAP SEDIMENT. VELOCITY IS REDUCED, WATER IS IMPOUNDED THE FABRIC. BEHIND THE MEASURE, AND SEDIMENT FALLS OUT OF SUSPENSION. 0 5. MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED EVERY SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OR AFTER EACH RAINFALL ; B. SILT FENCE OR STRAWBALE DIKE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON A LINE OF EQUAL OF %2" OR MORE WITHIN A 24 HOUR PERIOD. MEASURES SHALL BE CLEANED AND REPAIRED ELEVATION (CONTOUR). THEY MAY BE INSTALLED AT INTERMEDIATE POINTS UP SLOPES AS AS REQUIRED. 11 o WELL AS AT THE BOTTOM, AS SHOWN IN THE DETAIL. 6. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN ACCUMULATION REACHES ONE-HALF OF THE MEASURE ° C. STRAWBALE DIKE OR SILT FENCE SHALL NOT BE USED IN OR ACROSS A FLOWING HEIGHT. SEDIMENT SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AS UNSUITABLE MATERIAL. is NATURAL CHANNEL, OR AREAS OF CONCENTRATED FLOW. 7. DRAINAGE AREAS: DATE BY DESCRIPTION APPROV. BY r MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA TRIBUTARY TO 1004" OF SILT FENCE SHALL BE I/4 ACRE. REVISIONS GENERAL NOTES MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA TRIBUTARY TO 100'-0" OF STRAWBALE DIKE SHALL BE '/4 ACRE. m TOWN OF SOUTHOLD y B. THE FOLLOWING ARE MAXIMUM SLOPE LENGTHS TO THESE MEASURES: a SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY SILT FENCE / STRAWBALE DIKE DIKE REHABILITATION �� SLOPE SLOPE HORIZ E o LENGTH LENGTH LS (FT) LH OFT) o DETAILS - 3 a r 2:1 25 22 3 3:1 50 47 4:1 75 73 L. K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.C. �2 5:1 too 98 p >5:1 100 98 CONSULTING ENGINEERS 437 SOUTH COUNTRY RD., BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK 11719 q Designed e CFD AS NOTED sheet No. 9. INSTALLATION, INCLUDING EXCAVATION, BACKFILL, AND COMPACTION OF STRAWBALE DIKES y' Scale: N o AND SILT FENCE SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNIT PRICE BID FOR ITEM. Drawn By PFT Date: JULY 2013 2 a Approved By: RGD File No. 13050.000