Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-8235 1•{•- - Off•f 94�.' y- •ff�r•91N- •I�f•�19• f '= 110��{. 0�-O�fi-. - !•ff�'r . '•°� }/ - "�o ( ///o's=�.= °111 1 i0f�'• - "�1 / 1fNi•- -' "";:�11 }If'"i•-;" •��11 %IPS., � .:` i�� I!' - - a•'• dem "Rlef .. -� _ "i` �"' o�" ° "i li'` t, " SUM ! ��;''*'9�:.K+�:.'�.,�','�M?n2:.!6'L.:i1T!''�s4��wT�`:.h*.i..e'lY!^YSi!°vp.'!v:'MTMy.1'.'i°" C�im'G'�_ Ri?71'.S�°^ >n'r!1TxS+" i"���.+*,S�a:��Tlri,'fT:i%Rw��'a�'pT�ma�PJ!?'!?A,TJfkrLrFY•yTro�17?�..�X�gMSI'.�`tiGfr��9' J — BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK }� r � ' PERMIT NO. 8235 & 8235C DATE: JUNE 19, 2013 x ISSUED TO: HARRINGTON FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP C/O DAVID � HARRINGTON a Z PROPERTY ADDRESS: PRIVATE ROAD ON CLAY POINT ROAD ' _ FISHERS ISLAND , SCTM#2-1-12 AUTHORIZATION y 1 Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 and/or Chapter 111 of the Town Code of the Town of 4 Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the meeting held on June 19,2013,and in consideration of application fee in the sum of$500.00 paid by Docko, Inc.and subject to the Tenns and Conditions as stated in the Resolution,the Southold Town Board of Trustees authorizes and permits the following: a Wetland Permit to reconstruct f138LF of 5' wide fixed wood pile and timber y- pier including four batter braced tie-off piles and ladders waterward of the apparent high water line; relocate 4' wide stairs with a new 5'x4' fixed landing and reconstruct ft an existing f3.5' x±34' wood access ramp landward of the apparent high water line; r with the condition thru-flow decking is used on entire dock and ramp; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by Docko, Inc., last dated July 17,2013, and stamped _ approved on July 30,2013. , IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date. I �g1IFF 0 C* _ �,_ �'"• ':S_f.,_:..'v"•' -'-�•/,t/•:b:._�':•^ - ^-ss_�i��.�.'"-'-•. _ -°'=I_:li�,::_,'�''"�, '��i�::%:r•- -- -,lal _°,`4«_,. �pf S0(/j John M. Bredemeyer IIl, President ��� y®�� Town Hall Annex Michael J. Domino,Vice-President 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 James F.King,Trustee cn Southold,New York 11971-0959 Dave Bergen, Trustee • a� O Telephone (631) 765-1892 Charles J. Sanders, Trustee COU i, Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 20, 2015 Mr. Keith Neilson, P.E. Docko, Inc. PO Box 421 Mystic, CT 06355 RE: HARRINGTON FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP C/O DAVID HARRINGTON PRIVATE ROAD ON CLAY POINT ROAD, FISHERS ISLAND SCTM# 2-1-12 Dear Mr. Neilson: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Board of Trustees at their Regular Meeting held on Wednesday, May 20, 2015: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Trustees grants a One-Year Extension to Wetland Permit#8235 and Coastal Erosion Management Permit#8235C, as issued on June 19, 2013. This is not an approval from any other agency. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, John M. Bredemeyer III President, Board of Trustees JMB/amn J John Bredemeyer, President �o%VF91,t Town Hall Annex Michael J. Domino, Vice-President j° oGy� 54375 Route 25 James F. King y ;� P.O. Box 1179 Charles J. Sanders • Southold, NY 11971 Dave Bergen y�O1 ,� �a Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection/Work Session Report Date/Time: �3 1 /� Docko, Inc. on behalf of HARRINGTON FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, c/o DAVID HARRINGTON requests a One-Yea r.Extension to Wetland Permit#8235 and Coastal Erosion Management Permit#8235C, as issued on June 19, 2013. Located: Private Road on Clay Point Road, Fishers Island. SCTM# 2-1-12 Type of area to be impacted: Saltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland Sound Bay Distance of proposed work to.edge of wetland Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: Chapt.275 Chapt. 111 other Type of Application: Wetland Coastal Erosion Amendment Administrative Emergency Pre-Submission Violation Notice of Hearing card posted on property: Yes No Not Applicable Storm Water Management Review: Yes No Not Applicable Info needed: Modifications: Conditions: V `� Present Were: ABredemeyer M. Domino J. King C. Sanders D. Bergen Bay Constable Other Form filled out in the field by Mailed/Faxed to: Date: Docko, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,CT 06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:office@docko.com April 13, 2015 Amanda Nunemaker APR 1 7 2015 Town of Southold Town Hall Annex 54375 Main Road Oz P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Re: Permit Extension#8235 &#8235C Harrington Family Limited Partnership Fishers Island To Whom It May Concern: On behalf of the Harrington Family Limited Partnership,we respectfully request an extension of one year for the above referenced permits, extending them to June 19, 2016; all work authorized in the permit has not yet been completed. A check in the amount of$100.00 for the extension fees has been enclosed. We look forward to receiving the requested permit extensions from you shortly. Very truly yours, D INC. 5eryl B. China Administrative Assistant JM: cc Enclosure CC: Jeff Campbell File: 12-07-2422 Campbell 46 i James F. King,President e�{FFat/( Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President P.O.Box 1179 Dave Bergen Southold,NY 11971 0 John Bredemeyer Telephone(631)765-1892 Michael J. DominoOl Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK, TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND POSSIBLE REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. INSPECTION SCHEDULE Pre-construction, hay bale line 'It day of construction % constructed Project complete, compliance inspection BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK PERMIT NO. 8235 & 8235C DATE: JUNE 19, 2013 ISSUED TO: HARRINGTON FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP C/O DAVID HARRINGTON PROPERTY ADDRESS: PRIVATE ROAD ON CLAY POINT ROAD, FISHERS ISLAND SCTM#2-1-12 AUTHORIZATION j Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 and/or Chapter I 1 I of the Town Code of the Town of Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the meeting held on June 19,2013,and in consideration of application fee in the sum of$500.00 paid by Docko, Inc.and subject to the Terms and Conditions as stated in the Resolution,the Southold Town Board of Trustees authorizes and permits the following: Wetland Permit to reconstruct f138LF of 5' wide fixed wood pile and timber pier including four batter braced tie-off piles and ladders waterward of the apparent high water line; relocate 4' wide stairs with a new 51x4' fixed landing and reconstruct an existing t3.5' x f34' wood access ramp landward of the apparent high water line; with the condition thru-flow decking is used on entire dock and ramp; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by Docko, Inc., last dated July 17, 2013, and stamped approved on July 30,2013. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date. p/ O�- �o�g11FF0(,�co C3 60o - - - - - - - - TERMS AND CONDITIONS The Permittee, Harrington Family Limited Partnership C/O David Harrington, residing at Private Road on Clay Point Road, Fishers Island, New York as part of the consideration for the issuance of the Permit does understand and prescribe to the following: 1. That the said Board of Trustees and the Town of Southold are released from any and all damages, or claims for damages, of suits arising directly or indirectly as a result of any operation performed pursuant to this permit,and the said Permittee will,at his or her own expense,defend any and all such suits initiated by third parties, and the said Permittee assumes full liability with respect thereto,to the complete exclusion of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold. 2. That this Permit is valid for a period of 24 months, which is considered to be the estimated time required to complete the work involved, but should circumstances warrant, request for an extension may be made to the Board at a later date. 3. That this Permit should be retained indefinitely, or as long as the said Permittee wishes to maintain the structure or project involved, to provide evidence to anyone concerned that authorization was originally obtained. 4. That the work involved will be subject to the inspection and approval of the Board or its agents, and non-compliance with the provisions of the originating application may be cause for revocation of this Permit by resolution of the said Board. 5. That there will be no unreasonable interference with navigation as a result of the work herein authorized. 6. That there shall be no interference with the right of the public to pass and repass along the beach between high and low water marks. 7. That if future operations of the Town of Southold require the removal and/or alterations in the location of the work herein authorized,or if, in the opinion of the Board of Trustees, the work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to free navigation,the said Permittee will be required, upon due notice,to remove or alter this work project herein stated without expenses to the Town of Southold. 8. That the said Board will be notified by the Permittee of the completion of the work authorized. 9. That the Permittee will obtain all other permits and consents that may be required supplemental to this permit, which may be subject to revoke upon failure to obtain same. • i James F. King, President Of SOUTyo Town Hall Annex Bob Ghosio,Jr., Vice-President �� l� 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Dave Bergen Southold, New York 11971-0959 John Bredemeyer G Q 'Q • �O Telephone(631) 765-1892 Michael J. Domino IyC�Vitm Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COASTAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PERMIT COASTAL EROSION PERMIT #8235C Applicant/Agent: Docko, Inc. Permittee: Harrington Family Limited Partnership c/o David Harrington SCTM#: 2-1-12 Project Location: Private Road on Clay Point Road, Fishers Island Date of Resolution/Issuance: June 19, 2013 Date of Expiration: June 19, 2015 Reviewed by: Board of Trustees DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY: To reconstruct t138LF of 5' wide fixed wood pile and timber pier including four batter braced tie-off piles and ladders waterward of the apparent high water line; relocate 4' wide stairs with a new 5'x4' fixed landing and reconstruct an existing ±3.5' x t34' wood access ramp landward of the apparent high water line; with the condition thru-flow decking is used on entire dock and ramp; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by Docko, Inc., last dated July 17, 2013, and stamped approved on July 30, 2013. INSPECTIONS: Final Inspection SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Thru-flow decking is to be used on entire dock and ramp In accordance with Chapter 111-15 Erosion Protection Structures: NIA A maintenance agreement is attached hereto and is a necessary special condition of this permit. BY: y James F. King, President Board of Trustees 0 0 James F. King, President ��oF soUTyo Town Hall Annex Bob Ghosio,Jr.,Vice-President �� l0 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Dave Bergen Southold, New York 11971-0959 John Bredemeyer G Q • �O Telephone (631) 765-1892 Michael J. Domino O�yCOUlrn N Fax(631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 19, 2013 Mr. Keith Neilson, P.E. Docko, Inc. PO Box 421 Mystic, CT 06355 RE: HARRINGTON FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP C/O DAVID HARRINGTON PRIVATE ROAD ON CLAY POINT ROAD, FISHERS ISLAND SCTM# 2-1-12 Dear Mr. Neilson: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wednesday, June 19, 2013 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Docko, Inc. on behalf of HARRINGTON FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP C/O DAVID HARRINGTON applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, and Chapter 111 of the Southold Town Code, Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas, application dated May 1, 2013, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator recommended that the proposed application be found Inconsistent with the LWRP, and, WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has furthered Policy 4.1 of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program to the greatest extent possible through the imposition of the following Best Management Practice requirements: the use of thru-flow decking on entire dock and ramp, and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on June 19, 2013, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, 2 • • WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 275 and Chapter 111 of the Southold Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that for the mitigating factors and based upon the Best Management Practice requirement imposed above, the Board of Trustees deems the action to be Consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program pursuant to Chapter 268-5 of the Southold Town Code, and, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approve the application of HARRINGTON FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP C/O DAVID HARRINGTON to reconstruct t138LF of 5' wide fixed wood pile and timber pier including four batter braced tie-off piles and ladders waterward of the apparent high water line; relocate 4' wide stairs with a new 5'x4' fixed landing and reconstruct an existing ±3.5' x t34' wood access ramp landward of the apparent high water line; with the condition thru-flow decking is used on entire dock and ramp; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by Docko, Inc., last dated July 17, 2013, and stamped approved on July 30, 2013. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date the permit is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Inspections are required at a fee of$50.00 per inspection. (See attached schedule.) Fees: $ 50.00 Very truly yours, James F. King President, Board of Trustees JFK/amn James F.King,President y Town Hall Annex Bob Crhosioio,Jr.,Vice-President 5 54375 Route 25,P.O.Box 1179 Dave Bergey .y ! Southold,NY 11971 Michael I.D John l L Doomeyer �/( ,y� Telephone(631)765-1892 ino 'R Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES / TOWN OFSOUTHOLD TO: _DoCI O , TY1C, �� � �[A1V1t �V L{ ot P0.c%>1i12YSh1t? Piease be advised that your application dated 5 3 has been reviewed by this Board at the regular meeting of . and your application has been approved pending the completion o the oilowing items checked off below. Revised Plans for proposed project lLSe a-F 4-hn,t.--0)6W oo eY1' re- docic +r-amp Pre-Construction Hay Bale Line Inspection Fee ($50.00) 1st Day of Construction ($50.00) % Constructed ($50.00) Final Inspection Fee ($50.00) Dock Fees($3.00 per sq. ft.) Permit fees are now due. Please make check or money ober payable to Town of Southold. The fee is computed.below according to the schedule of rates as set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code. The following fee must be paid within 90 days or re-application fees will be necessary. You will receive your permit upon completion of the above. COMPUTATION OF PERMIT FEES: TOTAL FEES DUE: $-6z—'-N0 BY: James F. King, President ���`�� Board of Trustees • �O��gpFFD(kea ti Peter Young,Chairman Town Hall,53095 Main Rd. Lauren Standish, Secretary T P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Telephone(631)765-1892 Fax(631)765-6641 Conservation Advisory Council Town of Southold At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., June 12, 2013 the following recommendation was made: HARRINGTON FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP C/O DAVID HARRINGTON to reconstruct 138 If. of 5' wide fixed wood pile and timber pier including four batter braced tie-off piles and ladders waterward of the apparent high water line. Relocate 4' wide stairs with a new 5'X 4' fixed landing and reconstruct an existing wood access ramp landward of the apparent high water line. Located: Private Rd. on Clay Point, Fishers Island. SCTM#2-1-12 The CAC did not make an inspection, therefore no recommendation was made. gpFFO�� lames F_King.PresidentF��� Cp_ P_O.Box 1179 Bob Ghosio.Jr_,Vice-President d Southold,NY 11971 Dave Bergen ? Telephone(631 765-1892 John Bredemeyer ,y Fax(63 1)765-6641 Michael.I. Domino Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection/Work Session Report DatelTime: l< )/2-1 /3 Docko, Inc. on behalf of HARRINGTON FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, c/o DAVID HARRINGTON requests a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit to reconstruct ±138LF of 5' wide fixed wood pile and timber pier including four batter braced tie-off piles and ladders waterward of the apparent high water line; relocate 4' wide stairs with a new 5'x4' fixed landing and reconstruct an existing ±3.5' x ±34' wood access ramp landward of the apparent high water line. Located: Private Road on Clay Point Road, Fishers Island. SCTM# 2-1-12 Type of area to be impacted: F . _Saltwater Wetland _Freshwater Wetland 1/Sound _Bay Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: _Chapt.275 _Chapt. 111/11 _other Type of Application: c- etland _Coastal Erosion _Amendment —Administrative—Emergency Pre-Submission Violation I np needed Modifications: Conditions: Present Were: v J. King L-B. Ghosio `�. Bergen, _1,,J. BredemeyerL--Michael Domino D. Dzenkowski other Form filled out in the field by I v; Mailed/Faxed to: Date: HARRINGTON PHOTOGRPAHS 'r SOON4 _ Photograph ) This photograph shows the full length of structure to be rebuilt, looking from about 100 offshore looking in an easterly direction from West Harbor. The piles, stringers and timbers will be removed in the demolition process. Reference piles will be left in place to make sure that the alignment of the pier is true to the long standing structure. The pier will be higher than the existing elevation in order to avoid wave buildup in these shallow waters when approaching from 1'tbe west. The end of the pier will be at approximately the elevation of the existing deck, 6 feet above mean low water. a � a Photograph 2 This photograph shows the isolated piles at the end of the pier, which will be deleted from the project. The remaining structure is minimal,the length is unnecessary to reach adequate depth for small to medium motor boating access. The rebuilt pier will stop just short of the inner pile in this photograph. r 41 F- OIL Photograph 3 This photograph shows the end of the existing pier looking in a south easterly direction toward shore,with the ramp and walkway up to the mainland in the upper center of the photograph. This photograph also shows the rocky shorefront sediments and the boulder to the south side of the main pier. The boulder will be spanned over by the new structure. The new decking over this boulder will be considerably higher by several feet to provide maximum clearance above waves which break on the shore. i Photograph 4 This photograph shows the shore end of the pier with the stairs to the beach that will be replaced as a part of the project. Clearly this is a fairly natural waterfront with a rocky shoreline and stony beach characteristics. There is minimal tidal wetlands vegetation at the site along the shore at the dock site and home that will be adversely impacted by the project or the use of this facility. The entire structure of pier and walkway along with the stairs to shore will be rebuilt as a part of this project but the new pier will be approximately 3 feet higher than the pier framing seen here and the replacement stair will parallel the pier reaching back toward the shoreline. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY D a - NEW YORK DISTRICT,CORPS OF ENGINEERS JACOB K.JAVITS FEDERAL BUILDING D NEW YORK,N.Y.10278-0090 MAY 17 2013 JUN 1 7 2013 REPLYTO ATTENTION OF: Ouftf on Regulatory Branch - Eastern Section Subject : Permit Application Number NAN-2013-00241 by Harrington Family Limited Partnership for maintenance work In the West Harbor, in the Fishers Island of Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York Harrington Family Limited Partnership Care of David Harrington 70 Rocky Hill Road Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania 09317 Dear Mr. Harrington: This office recently received a Permit Application for in- water construction activities located waterward of the mean high tide line in navigable waters and/or discharge of fill material into waters of the United States, as cited above. It appears that your proposed work may be authorized under one or more Department of the Army nationwide general permit (s) . Please refer to the enclosed material for information pertaining to the nationwide general permit program. You may presume that your project qualifies for authorization by Nationwide Permit #3 provided that the proposed work of reconstructing a 148-linear foot by 5-foot wied fixed wood pile and timber pier, including 4 batter braced tie-off piles and ladders in the West Harbor meets the terms, conditions, and language of the Nationwide Permits (77 FR 10184 ) , dated February 21, 2012 . If you desire a project- specific determination as to Nationwide Permit applicability, you should contact this office to discuss what additional information will be necessary. However, if your project meets the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit program, there is no need for additional contact. You are reminded that a Department of the Army permit may be required for any additional work that does not qualify for a Nationwide Permit on this site . If you decide to implement any other project on this site in the future, please submit a timely - l - and completed application for our review. Impacts to waters of the United States for this project may be reviewed cumulatively with any future requests or any other applications you may submit for work in waters of the United States on this site . Please note that this does not eliminate the need to obtain any other Federal, State or local authorizations required by law for the proposed work, including any required permit or Water Quality Certification from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) or a Coastal Zone Management consistency certification from the New York State Department of State (NYSDOS) . In order for us to better serve you, please complete our Customer Service Survey located at : http: //pert . nwp.usace . army.mil/survey.html A copy of this letter is being sent to NYSDEC, Region 1; 1 �A;� and Keith B. Neilson, P. E. , Docko, Inc. , PO 21 ox 4 , it 8, Connecticut 06355 Any inquires should be directed to the Regulator-of-the-Day at 917-790-8511 . Sincerely, Michael Scarano, P. E. Deputy Chief, Regulatory Branch Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NEW YORK DISTRICT,CORPS OF ENGINEERS JACOB K.JAVITS FEDERAL BUILDING NEW YORK,N.Y.10278-0090 REPLYTO ATTENTION OF: CENAN-OP-RE NATIONWIDE PERMIT COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION AND REPORT FORM Permittee: Harrington Family Limited Partnership Permit No. NAN-2013-00241-EMC Date Permit Issued: MAY 17 2013 Location: Fishers Island, Town of Southold, Suffolk County State of New York Within 30 days of the completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit, sign this certification and return it to the address at the bottom of this form. Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you are subject to permit suspension, modification or revocation. I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of said permit, and required mitigation was completed in accordance with the permit conditions. Signature of Permittee Date FOLD THIS FORM INTO THIRDS, WITH THE BOTTOM THIRD FACING OUTWARD. TAPE IT TOGETHER AND MAIL TO THE ADDRESS BELOW OR FAX TO (212) 264.4260. PLACE STAMP HERE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NEW YORK DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS JACOB K. JAVITS FEDERAL BUILDING ATTN: CENAN-OP-RE NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10278-0090 HARONGTON FAMILY LIMITED PARARSHIP WEST HARBOR/FISHERS ISLAND SOUND FISHERS ISLAND, NEW YORK NARRATIVE STATEMENT & SUPPLEMENTAL INF 1 � ' V D FOR NYS DEC,NYS/DOS AND TOWN OF SOUTHOLD A FEBRUARY 2013 MAy - 1 2013 GENERAL Southold Town The Harrington Family Limited Partnership owns parcel 1000-02-01-12 off Private Road located along the west shore of Clay Point / Fishers Island Sound on Fishers Island. The site is generally moderately sloped, sandy gravel soils, vegetated with grass, brush, landscaping ground cover and trees. The frontage of the property is approximately 400 feet along West Harbor at the east shore, abutted by the Ferguson H L Museum,property to the north and Jabco Limited Partnership to the south. The waterfront consists of a partially rock-covered beach with tidal wetlands vegetation at the base of the moderately sloped coastal bluff in the vicinity of the pier. It is Harrington family's desire to reconstruct the fixed pier dock system. The pier will be at an end elevation of 6 feet above mean low water (MLW), sloping upward and crossing over the boulder-strewn intertidal zone above the bottom sediments until reaching a finished elevation of about 8.5 feet as a level dock, a level landing to shore at that elevation, stopping short of the bank with an angled ramp to allow passage of the public. Attached are application drawings prepared for this project showing this configuration and pertinent details. This supplemental narrative has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Town of Southold, Ordinance No. 6, 2004, and the Waterfront Revitalization Program related to docks and shorefront improvements. In addition, various coastal policies under the New York State Coastal Management Act are addressed herein for review by the New York State Department of State and Department of Environmental Conservation. DESCRIPTION OF WORK As mentioned in the introductory paragraph, this project is to re-construct a fixed wood pile and timber pier from the shore out into West Harbor / Fishers Island Sound in accordance with existing guidelines set forth in the Town of Southold ordinance No. 6, 2004. It is envisioned that this structure will be built utilizing the following general sequence and methodology. ➢ The marine contractor will arrive by water with barge-mounted crane and push boats. ➢ The existing pier will be demolished and all materials salvaged for disposal in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and ordinances. ➢ New piles will be driven starting at the new shore landing end of the pier and proceeding waterward at roughly 10-foot intervals to the waterward end of the pier. These piles will be driven by double-acting air hammer to a bearing capacity and pull-out resistance of approximately 20 tons. This generally results in about ten feet of embedment of the pile in the bearing stratum. Because of the exposure with the prevailing wind westerly wave field, these piles will be 12-inch nominal diameter class B Southern Yellow Pine pressure treated to 2.5 pcf of CCA type 3. 1 ➢ After the piles are installed, split caps (also referred to as split clamps) consisting of a pair of pressure treated Southern Pine timbers, 3 x 10 to 4 x 12 nominal dimension, will be bolted to the piles transversely forming a pile bent. Stringers will be then laid on the split caps parallel to the length of the pier. In all likelihood, three runs of stringers will be set and will probably consist of 3 x 10 pressure-treated Southern Pine. ➢ The outer stringer on each side will be bolted or spiked to the pile to secure it against any uplift forces that this pier might be exposed to. ➢ After the stringers have been connected to the piles and split caps, the decking will be installed. In accordance with Town of Southold's Ordinance No. 6, 2004, this decking will not be CCA pressure-treated Southern Pine but rather oak, cedar hardwood or plastic/ composite such as "Timber Tech" or similar synthetic, composite or plastic material with the brushed side mounted up. If composites or plastic are used, it will be either gray, brown or natural in color. Decking will be attached to the stringers utilizing galvanized nails or stainless steel Phillips or flathead square-drive wood screws about 3 inches long and will be set with a '/4" gap between deck planks. ➢ The over-water decking will run level at a height of up to eight feet above the existing bottom sediments in the shallow sub-tidal zone. See Sheet 4 of the application drawings for the pier profile. ➢ The piles will be about 42 inches above the deck surface and support horizontal rail members. ➢ The mid-rail can be timber or cable and both details are shown. ➢ A top rail of cedar, oak, hardwood or Timber Tech material will be installed for safety. ➢ Water and electricity will be run out on the pier in the space between the stringers so that trickle chargers on the boat may be powered during tie-ups. The water will allow boats to be rinsed off after usage. A power post with an internal light will be mounted to the end of the fixed pier with receptacles to provide power to the boats from extension cords. The power post will also have coiling arms for storage of the electric service cord and hose between uses. Because the dock may be used during the hours of darkness, low-intensity lights will be mounted on staggered piles or dock rail posts to illuminate the deck and the walking surface up the bank. This system will be manually or radio controlled with a shut-off timer so that the lights will only be on when necessary for safety of the users. LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION POLICIES The Town of Southold, LWRP policies that are applicable to the dock proposal are a local refinement of the Long Island Sound Regional Coastal Management Program policies that apply throughout Long Island Sound. The Harrington site is in West Harbor off Fishers Island Sound on Fishers Island and is characterized predominately as undeveloped coast or natural coast. The undeveloped coast policies are applicable as follows: ➢ Policy 1 is to foster a pattern of development that enhances community character and preserves natural resources to the maximum extent and minimizes adverse impacts on the environment, ➢ Policy 2 is to preserve historic resources, ➢ Policy 3 is to enhance and protect scenic resources and visual quality. The pier reconstruction for the Harrington family is consistent with waterfront development on Fishers Island and in coastal areas. The pier is made of suitably-sized timbers and utilizes the materials allowable under Local Law #6 with due consideration of climatic conditions at the site. This proposal is consistent with other adjacent dock facilities and characteristics for the visual and scenic considerations. The encroachment has been minimized to be consistent with DEC policies, Southold Local Law #6, US ACOE policies and the structure is as low profile as possible consistent 2 with the safe and efficier0e of the waters and consistent witht dal range of this site. Lighting will be minimal for operational safety and otherwise off, and rghts will be utilized only when necessary for boating purposes so that during hours of darkness there will be no adverse impact NATURAL COAST POLICIES The Natural Coastal Policies are 4 through 8 and require consideration as follows: ➢ Policy 4—Minimize loss of life, structures and natural resources from flooding and erosion, ➢ Policy 5 —Protect and improve water quality ➢ Policy 6—Protect and restore the quality and function of the eco-system, ➢ Policy 7—Protect and improve air quality, ➢ Policy 8 - Minimize environmental degradation primarily from solid waste and hazardous substances. The pier reconstruction for the Harrington family recreational boating facility has been laid out and configured so as to be consistent with the DEC permit requirements for such structures and in accordance with recommendations of the Board of Trustees offered during the workshop presentation. There was no tidal wetlands vegetation on the beach where the pier begins. The pier has been configured high, clear of submerged aquatic vegetation in the shallow sub-tidal waters. As such, it provides adequate height to clear environmental resources of concern and the materials to be utilized are consistent with Town of Southold's Local Law #6 regarding environmental quality and the use of pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine timber components in particular. There will be no adverse impacts on air quality as a result of this structure and the construction of the dock should not diminish overall environmental considerations in West Harbor/Fishers Island Sound. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9 sets forth a priority to provide for public access and recreational use of coastal waters, public lands and public resources of the Town. This project creates a recreational boating facility for the Harrington property and so is consistent with this policy. WORKING COAST POLICIES The policies of this section relate to the following: ➢ Policy 10 — Protection of the Town's water-dependent uses and promoting new water- dependent uses in suitable locations, ➢ Policy 11 —Promoting sustainable use of living marine resources, ➢ Policy 12—Protect agricultural lands, ➢ Policy 13 —Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. While most of the Working Coast Policies are not applicable to this site or this type of project, Policy 10, promoting water-dependent uses and the siting of water-dependent uses in appropriate areas is applicable. The proposed project has been laid out to make the most beneficial use of the land and locating the dock facility in the most appropriate,historic point of the land where access down the bank will not require excessive structural facilities and can be accommodated with path work rather than formal stairs and so on. This project has been laid out with specific reference and review of the Waterfront Revitalization Program policies and is considered to be consistent. 3 In summary, the is typical of recreational boating fo&ies throughout the area and all along coastal New Englan . The structure has been minimized in ze, height, and structure so as to be consistent with other facilities of a similar nature and the minimum necessary components to accommodate safe and efficient boating operations from this site safely in a variety of climatic conditions. This project does not interfere with public access or use of public trust waters and lands of the State, it does not interfere with navigation, it will not create soil or sedimentation erosion problems, it does not adversely environmental resources and in the area where the facility must span the intertidal zone at the shore line, the facility has been located in the area of rocks where environmental resources have already been diminished so as not to worsen any of these conditions. The height of the structure has been specifically addressed so as to allow vegetation of the shoreline by tidal wetlands plants if other conditions are conducive to such growth. The dock facility has also been located reaching out to the deepest water in Fisher Island Sound/ West Harbor so that dredging will not be an issue in the future, thus further minimizing adverse environmental impacts. More than 95% of the Harrington shoreline will remain in a natural state as a result of these considerations for design. There is no loss of valuable marine and wetland habitat and no water quality degradation as a result of this project. No natural protective features or processes will be adversely impacted as a result of the proposed docking facility. Dense growth areas of submerged aquatic vegetation in the proposed dock or berthing area have been avoided. Reference is made to the NYS DEC study from 2000 indicating the suitability of pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine piles and super-structure components for this type of purpose. The piles must be 12 inch diameter due to site exposure. In accordance with Local Law #6, decking for the pier and the ramp treads will be of woods other than Southern Yellow Pine or plastic. This project is consistent with zoning policies and ordinances for the Town. The dock facility will be an accessory to the home located at this site. There will be no development of the upland related to this dock facility that will create point sources of pollution or drainage. This project is considered to be providing recreational boating and water usage opportunity compatible with the natural resource values and characteristics of the site. The dock is the optimum size for stability considerations especially acknowledging that waves from the north can come into Fishers Island Sound/West Harbor and the floating dock is angled into those waves. REOUIREMENTS OF SECTION 97-25 OF THE WETLANDS LAW 6,2004 The permittee acknowledges that the validity of this permit is subject to the approval of other governmental or municipal authorities. The permittee does, by the acceptance of this permit, assume all responsibility for operations undertaken pursuant to this permit, and shall take all precautions for the prevention of injuries to persons and property resulting from such operations. By such acceptance, the permittee also agrees to indemnify and save harmless the Town and its officers. The permittee gives consent to the Town and its officers, employees and agents to enter upon the premises where such operations are being conducted to make such inspections to determine whether said operations are being conducted in conformity with the permit. The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing one week prior to initiation of any and all operations. The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing upon completion of operations such that the site can be inspected for issuance for a certificate of compliance. In response to Sub-section 2a and the General Rules for Standards of Residential and Commercial Docks, the following additional information is offered. 4 1. Permits A the work are being applied for through the Town, US ACOE, NYS DEC and a coastal zone consistency determination by the NYS DOS. 2. The new piles to be installed will be of sturdy, durable and stable materials; in all likelihood, Greenhart, Kakaralli or CCA Type 3 pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine (SYP) 12 inch diameter class B piles with new split caps and braces of pressure-treated SYP materials. These members will be a minimum of 3 x 8's and more often, 3 x 10's with at least one 1 inch bolt per connection, and in many cases, two '/a inch bolts per connection. This pier is a fixed, pile-supported timber structure and therefore will not adversely affect the free circulation of water or reduce the effects of fluctuating water levels in Fishers Island Sound. In addition, the pier does not present any adverse modification of the shoreline. The pier's end elevation is such that in extreme high flood tides the structure will be inundated. The structure's SYP timber materials represent the standard of the industry being specifically grown for this type of usage and are capable of withstanding full immersion. With the connections described above, this structure will be able to survive repeated inundations and even direct waves at high tide elevations with a structural life of approximately 20 years. 3. The pier support will include driving new 12 inch diameter piles at 10-foot intervals to the maximum extent possible in order to obtain the desired pier alignment and support intervals. The use of CCA pressure-treated piles and timbers can be approved for this project in accordance with Local Law 6. 4. The pier will not be decked with CCA pressure-treated Southern Pine. This pier/ walkway provides a safe pedestrian surface for access to the berthed boat. Rails may be installed on the pier for safety. 5. The pier is located near the center of the property line. The 15-foot clearance specified in this paragraph has been honored and should not be an issue because the proposed pier does not represent a significant encroachment into the boating operation area of the property to the south or to the north nor does it project into the navigation way for other boaters in the cove. 6. Upon receipt of the permit for this project, appropriate permit numbers and a Town permit placard will be affixed to the most seaward face of the pier for identification from the water. 7. There are no permanent structures located above the pier decking, nor are any planned at this time, other than the power post and railing which are fixed by function. 8. It is currently possible to provide a five-foot passage way beneath this pier and that access ability will be retained landward of the apparent high water line. There is only minimal room to walk under the pier at high tide, however, foot traffic in this area is rare, if at all and so the additional structure of an up and over stairway has been left out of this pier layout. 5 NEW YORK STATE *STAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAO These application documents include a copy of the Federal Consistency Assessment Form utilized for the New York State Coastal Management Program under the jurisdiction of the New York State Department of State. The following policies have been identified as pertinent to this application and the reason for consistency associated with this project is outlined in each respective case. Policy 2—Water Dependent Uses—This project is to construct a fully functional water dependent use, a recreational boating dock facility at this site in support of recreational boating. Policy 5 — Use of Existing Developed Shorefront—There is no developed shoreline on this site. This project utilizes natural existing shorefront which is dominated by an accumulation of stone which has abundant vegetative resources such as bittersweet, poison ivy and junipers with only sporadic patches of tidal wetlands vegetation. The project will be to rebuild the pier and ramp it to a logical shoreward terminus to make it safe and reliably usable in most weather conditions without impeding shoreline public access. Policy 7 — Significant Fish & Wildlife Habitat — Protection of significant fish and wildlife habitat has been considered in the development of this project layout. The pier, to the shoreward point of beginning, has avoided the shoreline spartina patches and runs four feet above the rocky intertidal sediments and should not jeopardize the health of any shoreline vegetation. Typically there is a slight environmental benefit to a pier project because of the creation of structure in the water column where barnacles, algae and crustaceans will colonize and grow. The alignment of the pier and the two slips passes clear of the mapped eel grass fringe strip that follows the 3 to 4 contours to the south. Policy 8 — Protection & Preservation of Habitat— Protection and preservation of habitat has also been considered in this project and the dock structure is being kept to its minimal configuration and of materials consistent with standards of the industry and restrictions set forth in the Wetlands Law, No. 6, 2004 set forth by the Town of Southold and standards of the NYS DEC. The pier is located over a stony part of the beach to make use of the least habitat and minimize damage to natural resources. Policy 11 — Minimize Damage to Natural Resources - The dock construction project has been laid out in such a way so as to minimize damage or impact to natural resources as identified in Policy 7 above. The dock facility has been sighted in its longstanding where stone on the beach has already impacted shoreline vegetation and the length reduced to the minimum practical length. Policy 14 — No Measurable Increase in Flooding - This project consists of construction of an open wood pile and timber pier which in no way adversely affects waterflow and circulation in West Harbor / Fishers Island Sound or flooding potential of the area. Flood levels all around Fishers Island are dictated by water levels in Long Island Sound, Fishers Island Sound and Block Island Sound and this structure will have no adverse influence or in any way impact on those levels. Policy 15 —No Dredging—Dredging is not required in this project. The dock system has been laid out in its current location and configuration to avoid any dredging requirements. The depth of 4 feet, as generally recommended by the NYS DEC and US ACOE, has been reached. The waters are protected enough that boats can be berthed bow to shore leaving the motor out in the deeper water. The boat will not ground out at low tide. Policy 19 — Impact on Public Access — Public access will not be jeopardized or impeded as a result of this project. As a matter of fact, there is almost no public access usage of the public trust lands or waters at this site except kayaking and canoeing. The intertidal zone is significantly covered by boulders and that is common on adjacent properties. The shallow sub-tidal waters do not present any 6 opportunity or enticeme4or public access in the area. The pieces not reach the landward 25% of the waterway width in accordance with US ACOE policies. Thus, public access to the State's lands and waters will not be adversely affected by the project. Policy 20 — Public Trust Compatibility with Existing Adjoining Properties and Land Uses Public Trust compatibility with existing adjoining properties and land uses have also been considered in this project. Several nearby properties have small docking facilities similar to this one and this docking facility will not interfere with existing or the likely configuration of future facilities on immediately adjoining properties or the logical allocation of littoral development rights. Policy 21 —Water Dependent Recreation—This project is consistent with water-dependent recreational opportunities policies set forth in this section. Policy 24 —Scenic Resources Impairment or Loss - "This policy is designed to prevent impairment or loss of scenic resources. The length, height and width of the fixed wood pile and timber pier will not represent such an extent of encroachment or structure which would create a loss of scenic resources. Policy 25 — Enhance Overall Scenic Quality - The new dock structure will be consistent with the scenic quality of the area and prevent loss of scenic resources as described in Policy 24 above. Policy 44 — Preserve and Protect Tidal Wetlands — It is acknowledged that the spartina altema flora exists sporadically in patches along the shorefront. The construction of the fixed wood pile and timber pier has taken advantage of a typical un-vegetated strip of the shoreline caused by the deposit of stone in order to avoid adverse wetlands vegetation impact. The height of the pier should allow opportunities for the growth of the spartina fringe marsh naturally up to, and to an extent, beneath the wood pier if other conditions are suitable, and the same with submerged aquatic vegetation, but to date that has not occurred in the proposed pier site. SUMMARY This project is for pier reconstruction for recreational boating access at property of the Harrington family on Fishers Island. A copy of all US Army Corps of Engineers, NYS DEC and Town of Southold applications are attached as substantiation for this project. This project complies with applicable standards of the New York State Coastal Management Act, NYS / DEC Tidal Wetland Regulations and criteria for approval, the Town of Southold Waterfront Revitalization Program and Local Ordinance No. 6, 2004 and its approval is thus respectfully requested. Respectfully submitted, DOOCCK-O, INC. Keith B. Neilson, P.E. 7 Docko, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,CT 06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:permits@docko.com E FIVE 72013 DD February 28, 2013 MAY NYS DEC Environmental Permits Southold Town Building 40, SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 Re: Harrington Family Limited Partnership Fishers Island, Pier Reconstruction To Whom It May Concern: On behalf the Harrington Family Partnership we request a Tidal Wetlands Permit including Water Quality Certifications, as necessary, for pier reconstruction in on Fishers Island, New York. We enclose the following in support of this permit application: ❖ Four prints each of plans titled: Project: "Pier Reconstruction" Waterway: Fishers Island Sound Location: Fishers Island,Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York Applicant: Harrington FamilyLimited Partnership Date: November 26, 2013 Four copies of the NYS DEC Joint Application, including the Short Environmental Assessment Form, Tax Assessor's Map, Photographs Location Map and Site Survey One copy of each application submitted to other regulatory agencies I trust that you will find this application package complete and acceptable; please let me know if the need for further information arises. Very truly yours, DOCKO, IN� eith B.Neilson, P.E. KBN: cb Enclosures CC: David Harrington US ACOE NYS DOS File: 12-07-2422 CAMPBELL 0 9 JOI NT APPLI CATI ON FORM For Permits/Determinations to undertake activities affecting streams, waterways, F1711 waterbodies, wetlands, coastal areas and sources of water supply. New York You must separately apply for and obtain separate Permits/ Determinations from US Army Corps of State each involved agency prior to proceeding with work. Please read all instructions. Engineers (USACE) APPLI CATI ONS TO 1. NYS Department of Environmental Conservation 2. US Army Corps of Engineers 3. NYS Office of 4. NYS Depart- General Services ment of State Check all permits that apply: Check all permits that apply: Stream Disturbance ❑ Coastal Erosion ❑ Section 404 Clean Water Act Check all permits that Check if this ❑ Excavation and Fill in Managementapply: e-sapplies: ❑ Section 10 Rivers and Harbors ❑State Owned Lands M Coastal r-f Navigable Waters 13 Wild, Scenic and Act Under Water Consistency ea Docks, Moorings or Recreational Rivers ( y g Nationwide Permit s) - Identify ❑Utility Concurrence Platforms ❑Water Supply Number(s): Easement ❑ Dams and Impoundment ❑ Long Island Well (pipelines, Structures ❑ Aquatic Vegetation Control conduits, 401 Water Qualitycables, etc.) ❑ Aquatic Insect Control ❑Docks, Certification Reconstruction Notification- ❑ ❑ Fish Control ❑ Y / ❑ N Moorings Freshwater Wetlands or ❑Tidal Wetlands ❑ Incidental Take of Endan- Platforms gered/Threatened Species I am sending this application r I am sending this I t am sending I am sending this application to this agency. to this agency. application to this this application agency. to this agency. 5. Name of Applicant (use full name) Applicant must be: 6. Name of Facility or Property Owner (if different than qr Owner Applicant) Harrington Family Limited Partnership ❑Operator Mailing Address ❑ Lessee Mailing Address C/o David Harrington (check all that apply) 70 Rocky Hill Road, Chadds Ford Post Office City Taxpayer ID (If applicant Post Office City PA 09317 is NOT an individual): State Zip Code State Zip Code Telephone(daytime) Email Telephone(daytime) Email 978-505-9277 7. Contact/Agent Name 8. Project/ Facility Name Property Tax Map Section/ Block/ Lot Number KEITH B.NEILSON,P.E. Harrington Family Limited Partnersh p 1000-2-1-12 Company Name Project Location - Provide directions and distances to roads, bridges and bodies of waters: DOCKO,INC. Private Road on Clay Point Mailing AddressP. .BOX 421 Street Address, if applicable Post Office City State Zip Code 2695 Windshield Drive Fishers Island NY 06390 Post Office City MYSTIC Town/ Village/ City County Fishers Island Suffolk State Zip Code Name of USGS Quadrangle Map Stream/Water Body Name CT 06355 New London, CT-RI-NY West Harbor Telephone(daytime) Location Coordinates: Enter NYTMs in kilometers, OR Latitude/Longitude (860)572-8939 Email NYTM-E NYTM-N Latitude Longitude pemnils@docko.com 41 46'38" N 71 59'35"W x Fx r " 5 FiYP —� ._g4j0 a�1 0albr! U OIIli7 1 � + 3 A6ert ae:am a�.D ` m w t q', c i s"„iia,: JOI NT APPLI CATI ON FORM 09/ 10 This is a 2 Page Application Application Form Page 1 of 2 Both Pages Must be Completed 0 JOI NT APPLI CATI ON FORM - PAGE 2 OF 2 Submit this completed page as part of your Application. 9. Project Description and Purpose: Provide a complete narrative description of the proposed work and its purpose. Attach additional page(s) if necessary. Include: description of current site conditions and how the site will be modified by the proposed project; structures and fill materials to be installed; type and quantity of materials to be used (i.e., square ft of coverage and cubic yds of fill material and/or structures below ordinary/mean high water) area of excavation or dredging, volumes of material to be removed and location of dredged material disposal or use; work methods and type of equipment to be used; pollution control methods and mitigation activities proposed to compensate for resource impacts; and where applicable, the phasing of activities. ATTACH PLANS ON SEPARATE PAGES To construct 148(+/-) LF of 5-FT wide fixed wood pile and timber pier including four batter braced tie-off piles and ladders waterward of the apparent high water line. Relocate 4-FT wide stairs with a new 5-FT X 4-FT fixed landing and reconstruct an existing wood access ramp landward of the apparent high tide line. Proposed Use: IVPrivate ❑ Public ❑Commercial ProposedEstimated i7No Date: Completion Date: Has Work Begun on Project? ❑ Yes ttp No If Yes, explain.. Will Project Occupy Federal, State or Municipal Land? ❑ Yes .p No If Yes, please specify. 10. List Previous Permit/ Application Numbers(if any) and Dates: US ACOE No. 2000-01593 in 2001, NYS DEC No. 1-4738-02792/00001 in 2001 11. Will this project require additional Federal, State, or Local Permits including zoning changes? SlYes ❑ No If yes, please list: Town of Southold, US ACOE and the NYS DOS 12. Signatures. If applicant Is not the owner, both must sign the application. I hereby affirm that information provided on this form and all attachments submitted herewith Is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. False statements made herein are punishable as a Class A misdemeanor pursuant to Section 210.45 of the Penal Law. Further, the applicant accepts full responsibility for all damage, direct or indirect, of whatever nature, and by whomever suffered, arising out of the project described herein and agrees to indemnify and save harmless the State from suits, actions, damages and costs of every name and description resulting from said project. In addition, Federal Law, 18 U.S.C., Section 1001 provides for a fine of n ore ha $10,000 r imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or both where an applicant knowingly and willingly falsifies, teal , or co ars u a m erial fact; or knowingly makes or uses a fel e, fictitious or fraudulent statement. ur A nt Printed Name rifle / Oate �-�. � 4 JhAtIiWAI ign re nary n N'ary�p [ itis � ate Si (nature of Agent Printed Name TitillDate For Agency Use Only DEiiERMlNATI%V OF NO PERMIT REOUI REO-,% - [ € all, f� � ..ax-:-Ya _� '� ,s;�.s r;* �` uaEi .a=" •_ ;° cti; 'K"=, �r. ''.,, �'�:r i�.`yn."o--��t:�: � r 4 -a�;„i` . .�.� �� ;�:.�'r JOI NT APPLI CAT[ON FORM 09/ 10 Application Form Page 2 of 2 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation lama PERMISSION TO INSPECT PROPERTY By signing this permission form for submission with an application for a permit(s)to the Department of Environmental Conservation("DEC'), the signer consents to inspection by DEC staff of the project site or facility for which a permit is sought and, to the extent necessary, areas adjacent to the project site or facility. This consent allows DEC staff to enter upon and pass through such property in order to inspect the project site or facility, without prior notice, between the hours of 7:00 a.m.and 7:00 p.m.,Monday through Friday. If DEC staff should wish to conduct an inspection at any other times, DEC staff will so notify the applicant and will obtain a separate consent for such an inspection. Inspections may take place as part of the application review prior to a decision to grant or deny the permits)sought. By signing this consent form,the signer agrees that this consent remains in effect as long as the application is pending, and is effective regardless of whether the signer,applicant or an agent is present at the time of the inspection. In the event that the project site or facility is posted with any form of"posted" or"keep out"notices,or fenced in with an unlocked gate, this permission authorizes DEC staff to disregard such notices or unlocked gates at the time of inspection. The signer further agrees that during an inspection,DEC staff may,among other things, take measurements, may analyze physical characteristics of the site including, but not limited to, soils and vegetation(taking samples for analysis), and may make drawings and take photographs. Failure to grant consent for an inspection is grounds for, and may result in, denial of the permit(s) sought by the application. Permission is gra/noted for inspection of property located at the following address(es): f �fi 0ku&tl. ICS tM uCC X By signing this form,I affirm under penalty of perjury that I am authorized to give consent to entry by DEC staff as described above. I understand that false statements made herein are punishable as a Class A misdemeanor pursuant to Section 21 .45 oft Penal Law.' Print Name and Title Signanite Date *The signer of this form most be an individual or authorized representative of a legal entity that: • owns fee title and is in possession of the property identified above; • maintains possessory interest in the properly through a lease,rental agreement or other legally binding agreement;or • is provided permission to act on behalf of an individual or legal entity possessing fee title or other possessory interest in the property for the purpose of consenting to inspection of such property. Permission to Inspect Property Application Supplement 12/09 PROJECT ID NUMBER 61720 SEAR APPENDIX C STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART 1 -PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by A)plicant or Project Sponsor) 1.APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2.PROJECT NAME Harrington Familyl-imited Partnership Pier Reconstruction 3.PROJECT LOCATION: Fishers Island, Town of Southold Suffolk Municipality County 4.PRECISE LOCATION: Street Addess and Road Intersections, Prominent landmarks etc -or provide map 2695 Windshield Drive off Private Road on Clay Point 5.IS PROPOSED ACTION: P New Expansion ❑Modification/alteration 6.DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: To construct 148(+/-)LF of 5-FT wide fixed wood pile and timber pier including four batter braced tie-off piles and ladders waterward of the apparent high water line. Relocate 4-FT wide stairs with a new 5-FT X 4-FT fixed landing and reconstruct an existing wood access ramp landward of the apparent high tide line. 7.AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially 0.1 acres Ultimately 0.1 acres B.WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS? myes ❑ No If no,describe briefly: 9.WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? (Choose as many as apply.) RResidential ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ElAgriculture ❑Park/Forest/Open Space Other (describe) 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (Federal, Stateor Local) 12Yes ElNo If yes, list agency name and permit / approval: Town of Southold, NYS DOS and the US ACOE 11.DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? Yes r_1 No If yes, list agency name and permit / approval: NYS DEC 2001 1-4738-02792/00001, 12. AS A RE ULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/ APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? es No 1 CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant / Sponsor N Date: Signature 3 If the action is a Costal Area,and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment Reset PART II- IMPACT ASSESSMENT To be completed by Lead Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.4? If yes,coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. ❑Yes ❑ No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.6? If No,a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. E] Yes [—] No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING:(Answers may be handwritten,if legible) C1. Existing air quality,surface or groundwater quality or quantity,noise levels,existing traffic pattern,solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion,drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic,agricultural,archaeological,historic,or other natural or cultural resources;or community or neighborhood character?Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna,fish,shellfish or wildlife species,significant habitats,or threatened or endangered species?Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources?Explain briefly: C5. Growth,subsequent development,or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed acton?Explain briefly: C6. Long term,short term,cumulative,or other effects not identified in C1-05? Explain briefly: C7. Other impacts(including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy? Explain briefly: D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREA(CEA)? If yes,explain briefly: Yes ❑No 17, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? If es ex Iain: 0 No PART III-DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE(To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above,determine whether it is substantial,large,important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its(a)setting(i.e.urban or rural);(b)probability of occurring;(c)duration;(d)irreversibility;(e) geographic scope;and(f) magnitude. If necessary,add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. If question d of part ii was checked yes,the determination of significance must evaluate the potential impact of the proposed action on the environmental characteristics of the CEA. Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FUL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation,that the proposed actio WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide, on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting thi determination. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsiba Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer different from responsh e c icer -Reset s ,� T DockO� inn. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,CT 06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:permits@docko.com LS ~ H D 2 Q 2 � V E February 28, 2013 NYS Dos L— D MAY - 1 2013 Department of Coastal Resources One Commerce Plaza 99 Washington Avenue Southold Town Albany,NY 12231 Board TTustoes Re: Harrington Family Limited Partnership Fishers Island, Pier Reconstruction To Whom It May Concern: On behalf of the Harrington Family Partnership, we submit the attached Federal Consistency Assessment Form for pier reconstruction in West Harbor on Fishers Island, New York. We enclose herewith the following in support of this permit application: One print each of plans titled: Project: "Pier Reconstruction" Waterway: Fishers Island Sound Location: Fishers Island, Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York Applicant: Harrington Family Limited Partnership Date: November 26, 2012 ❖ One copy of Corps of Engineers, NYS DEC Location Map, Tax Assessor's Map and NYS DOS Coastal Management Federal Consistency Assessment Forms and color photographs I trust that you will find this application package complete and acceptable: please let me know if the need for further information arises. Very truly yours, � DO KOINC , EiTL_ Keith B. Neilson, P.E. KBN: cb Enclosures CC: David Harrington NYS DEC: Regulatory Affairs ACOE File: 12-07-2422 CAMPBELL r • , NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Federal Consistency Assessment Form An applicant,seeking a permit,license,waiver,certification or similar type of approval from a federal agency which is subj ect to the New York State Coastal Management Program(CMP),shall complete this assessment form for anyproposed activity that will occur within and/or directly affect the State's Coastal Area. This form is intended to assist an applicant in certifying that the proposed activity is consistent with New York State's CMP as required by U.S. Department of Commerce regulations(15 CFR 930.57).It should be completed at the time when the federal application is prepared. The Department of State will use the completed form and accompanying information in its review of the applicant's certification of consistency. A.APPLICANT (please print) 1.Name: Harrington Family Limited Partnership C/o David Harrington 2.Address:70 Rocky Hill Road. Chadds Ford PA 19371 3. Telephone: Area Code(9781 505-9277 B. PROPOSED ACTIVITY 1.Brief description of activity: Reconstruct 148 (+/-) LF of 5-FT wide fixed wood pile and timber pier including four batter braced tie-off piles and ladders waterward of the apparent high water line. Relocate 4-FT wide stairs with a new 5-FT X 4-FT fixed landing and reconstruct an existing wood access ramp landward of the apparent high water line. 2.Purpose of actiVity7 To Provide a recreational boating facilitV for the Harrington famil . 3.Location of activity: Suffolk Town of Southold Off Private Road on Clay Point County City,Town,or Village Street or Site Description 4.Type of federal permitilicense required: U S Artily Corps of Engineers 5.Federal application number,if known: 6. If a state permit/license was issued or is required for the proposed activity,identify the state agency and provide the application or permit number,if known: C. COASTAL ASSESSMENT Check either"YES" or"NO"for each of these questions. The numbers following each question refer to the policies described in the CMP document(see footnote on page 2)which may be affected by the proposed activity. 1.Will the proposed activity result in any of the following: YES/NO a.Large physical change to a site within the coastal area which will require the preparation 13 �y of an environmental impact statement? (11,22,25,32,37,38,41,43) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �[J b.Physical alteration of more than two acres of land along the shoreline,land 13under water or coastal waters? (2, 11, 12,20,28,35,44). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 c.Revitalization/redevelopment of a deteriorated or underutilized waterfront site? (1) . . . . . . a g d.Reduction of existing or potential public access to or along coastal waters? (19,20). . . . . . Q g e.Adverse effect upon the commercial or recreational use of coastal fish resources? (9,10). . . Q f Siting of a facility essential to the exploration,development and production of energy resources in coastal waters or on the Outer Continental Shelf? (29) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Q g. Siting of a facility essential to the generation or transmission of energy? (27) . . . . . . . . . . . Q. V h.Mining,excavation,or dredging activities,or the placement of dredged or fill material in coastal waters? (15,35). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Q i.Discharge of toxics,hazardous substances or other pollutants into coastal waters? (8, 15,35) Q j. Draining of stormwater runoff or sewer overflows into coastal waters? (33) . . . . . . . . . . . . ❑_ 1 k.Transport,storage,treatment,or disposal of solid wastes or hazardous materials? (36,39). Q 1.Adverse effect upon land or water uses within the State's small harbors? (4). . . . . . . . . . . . Q Aff 2. Will the proposed activity affect or be located in,on,or adjacent to any of the following: YES/NO a. State designated freshwater or tidal wetland? (44) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ❑ b.Federally designated flood and/or state designated erosion hazard area? (11, 12, 17). . . . . 1 c.State designated significant fish and/or wildlife habitat? (7). . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . ❑ d. State designated significant scenic resource or area? (24). . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Q _ e. State designated important agricultural lands? (26). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a f. Beach,dune or barrier island? (12) . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . Q g.Major ports of Albany,Buffalo,Ogdensburg,Oswego or New York? (3). . . . . . . . . . . .. . . Q h. State,county,or local park? (19,20). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . Q i.Historic resource listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places? (23) . . . . . . . . Q 3.Will the proposed activity require any of the following: YES/NO a.Waterfront site? (2,21,22). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �_ _❑ b.Provision of new public services or infrastructure in undeveloped or sparsely populated sections of the coastal area? (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ❑ Q� c.Construction or reconstruction of a flood or erosion control structure? (13, 14, 16) . . . . . . . Q d. State water quality permit or certification? (30,38,40) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e. State air quality permit or certification? (41,43) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . g 4. Will the proposed activity occur within and/or affect an area covered by a State approved local waterfront revitalization program? (see policies in local program document). . . . . . . . . . .. . . ❑ • 0 D.ADDITIONAL STEPS 1.If all of the questions in Section C are answered"NO",then the applicant or agency shall complete Section E and submit the documentation required by Section F. 2.If any of the questions in Section C are answered"YES",then the applicant or agent is advised to consult the CMP,or where appropriate,the local waterfront revitalization program document'. The proposed activity must be analyzed in more detail with respect to the applicable state or local coastal policies. On a separate page(s),the applicant or agent shall: (a) identify,by their policy numbers,which coastal policies are affected by the activity,(b)briefly assess the effects of the activity upon the policy; and,(c)state how the activity is consistent with each policy. Following the completion of this written assessment,the applicant or agency shall complete Section E and submit the documentation required by Section F. E.CERTIFICATION The applicant or agent must certify that the proposed activity is consistent with the State's CMP or the approved local waterfront revitalization program,as appropriate. If this certification cannot be made,the proposed activity shall not be undertaken. If this certification can be made,complete this Section. "The proposed activity complies with New York State's approved Coastal Management Program,or with the applicable approved local waterfront revitalization program,and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such program." Applicant/Agent's Name: Harrington Family Limited Partnership, C/o David Harrington Address: 70 Rocky Hill Road, Chadds Ford, PA 09317 Telephone: Area Code( 978) G 9277 ll Applicant/Agent's Signature: 11C r 14 Date: CM F. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS L The applicant or agent shall submit the following documents to the New York State Department of State,Office of Coastal,Local Government and Community Sustainability,Attn: Consistency Review Unit,1 Commerce Plaza,99 Washington Avenue-Suite 1010,Albany,New York 12231. a. Copy of original signed form. b.Copy of the completed federal agency application. c. Other available information which would support the certification of consistency. 2.The applicant or agent shall also submit a copy of this completed form along with his/her application to the federal agency. 3. If there are any questions regarding the submission of this form,contact the Department of State at (518) 474-6000. *These state and local documents are available for inspection at the offices of many federal agencies,Department of environmental Conservation and Department of State regional offices,and the appropriate regional and county planning agencies. Local program documents are also available for inspection at the offices of the appropriate local government. 4 • Docko front community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mys - :( 0)572-7569,email:permits@docko.com MAY - 1 2013 February 28, 2013 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jacob Javits Federal Center,Room 1937 thold own New York,New York 10278-0090 Amrd of Re: Harrington Family Limited Partnership Pier Reconstruction To Whom It May Concern: On behalf of the Harrington Family Partnership we request a Department of the Army Permit for pier reconstruction in West Harbor on Fishers Island, New York. We enclose herewith the following in support of this permit application: ❖ Two prints each of plans titled: Project: "Pier Reconstruction" Waterway: Fishers Island Sound Location: Fishers Island, Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York Applicant: Harrington Family Limited Partnership Date: November 26, 2012 d• Two copies of Corps of Engineers and NYS DEC Application Forms, Location Map, Tax Assessor's Map, photographs and NYS DOS Federal Consistency Assessment Form. ❖ One copy of NYS DOS Consistency Review Form. The Town of Southold application will be sent at a later date. I trust that you will find this application package complete and acceptable; please let me know if the need for further information arises. Very truly yours, D.00KO, INq. Keith B.Neilson, P.E. KBN: cb Enclosures CC: David Harrington NYS DEC: Environmental Permits ACOE, NYS DOS File: 12-07-2422 CAMPBELL APPLICATION FOR�TMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT OMB APPROVAL NO.0710-003 (33 CER 325) 0 1 EXPIRES: 31 August 2012 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to avenge 5 hours per response,including the time for reviewing instructions,searching existing data sources,gathering and mabnlp—g the data needed,and completing and reviewing the collection of irfor atim. Send comments regarding this burden estimate of any other aspect ofthis collection of information,including suggestions for reducing ibis burden,to Department of Defense,Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of of Information Operations and Reports,1215 Jefferson Davis Highway,Suite 1204,Arlington,VA 222024302;and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project(0710-0003),Washington,DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either ofthose addresses.Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer havingjurisncction over the location ofthe proposed activity. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT Authority:33 USC 401,Section 10;1413,Section 404. Principal Purpose:These laws require permits authorizing activities in,navigable waters of the United States the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States,and the transportation of dredged material for the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters Rommo Uses: Information provided on this form will be used in evahatingthis application for a permit. Disclosure: Disclosureofrequesled information is is voluntary. If information is not provided,however,the permit application cannot be processed nor can a Permit be inured One act of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this applicatiom (see sample drawings and instructions)and be submitted to the District Engineer havingjurisdictim ofthe proposed activity. An application that is not completed in f dl will be returned (TTEM14SI THRU 4 TOBEFHLEDBY 777E CORPS) 1.APPLICATION NO. 2.FIELD OFFICE CODE 3.DATE RECEIVED 4.DATE APP.COMPLETED I T EMS BELOW TO BE FHJED BYAPPLICANT 5.APPLICANTS NAME S.AUTHORIZED AGENTS NAME&TITLE HARRINGTON FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DOCKO,INC. C/O MR DAVID HARRINGTON KEITH B. NEILSON,RE 6.APPLICANTS ADDRESS 9.AGENTS ADDRESS 70 ROCKY HILI,ROAD P.O.BOX 421 CHADDS FORD,PA 19317 MYSTIC,CT 06355 7.APPLICANTS PHONE NOS W/AREA CODE 10.AGENTS PHONE NO'S W/AREA CODE a.Residence 978-505-9277 a.Residence b.Business b.Business (860)572-8939 11.STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION I hereby authorize,DOCKO,INC.to act in my behalf as my agent in processing of this application and to famish,upon request, supplemental information in support of this permiton. Q L-� APPLICANTS SIGNA DATE MR, DAVID HARRINGTON FOR HARRINGTON FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP NAME,LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY 12.PROJECT NAME OR TITLE(See instructions) PIER RECONSTRUCTION 13.NAME OF WATERBODY,IF KNOW(if applicable) 14.PROJECT STREET ADDRESS(if applicable) WEST HARBOR 2695 WINDSHIELD DRIVE FISHERS ISLAND,NY 06390 15.LOCATION OF PROJECT LATITUDE: 410 46'38"N LONGITUDE: 72°59'35"W 16.OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS,IF KNOWN, (See instructions) WEST SHORE OF WEST HARBOR ON CLAY POINT,FISHERS ISLAND 17.DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE 2695 WINDHIELD DRIVE OFF PRIVATE ROAD ON CLAY POINT ENG FORM 4345,SEPT.2009 EDITION OF OCT 2004 IS OBSOLETE. ProponeaCECW-0R 1 S.Nature of Activity(Description of project,in it features) TO RECONSTRUCT 148(+/-)LF OF 5-Fr WIdWED WOOD PILE AND TIMBER PIER INCLUDING 0 BATTER BRACED TIE-OFF PILES AND LADDERS WATERWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER LINE.RELOCATE 4-FT WIDE STAIRS WITH A NEW 5-FT X 4-FT FIXED LANDING AND RECOSTRUCT AN EXISTING WOOD ACCESS RAMP LANDWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER LINE. 19.Project Purpose(Describe the reason or purpose of the project,see instructions) THE PURPOSE OF THIS PROJECT IS TO PROVIDE A RECREATIONAL BOATING FACILITY FOR THE HARRINGTON FAMILY. USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED 20.Reason(s)for Discharge N/A 21.Type(s)of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards N/A 22.Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled(see instructions) ACRES or N/A LINEAR FEET 23. Description of Avoidance,Minimization and Compensation(see instructions) NONE NEEDED. 24.Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete:_ Yes _X_No If YES,describe the completed work 25. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners,Lessees,Etc.,Whose Property Adjoins the Watedwdy(if more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental list). NORTH:H L FERGUSON MUSEUM,DAY PITNEY LLP,ONE CANTERBURY GREEN STAMFORD,Cr 06901 please we attached supplemental list. SOUTH:JADCO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,MR J GEDDES PARSONS,PARSONS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC.10 WEYBOSSEIT ST.SUITE 106,PROVIDENCE,RI 02903 26.List of Other Certifications or Appruvalss/Denials Received from other Federal,Sante or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' [DENT.NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED NYS DEC TIDAL WETLANDS Pending Feb-13 Pending NYS DOS CZM CONSISTANCY Pending Feb-13 Pending TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TIDAL WETLANDS Pending. Feb-13 Pending •Would include but is not restricted to zoning,building and flood plain permits. 27. Application is hereby rade for a peanut or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this application is _.... _... _...—_ complete and arcuate. I f uthersaYift that I saws the auto undertake the described herein or am eting as the duly ar lhonzed agent of the applicant. Z L SIGNATURE OF APP CANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE MR DAVID HARRINGTON KEITH B. NEILSON,P.E. DOCKO, INC. The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity(applicant)or it rosy be signed by a duly authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed. 18 U.S.C.Section 1001 provides that:Whoever,in any manner within the jurisdiction of ay deparmrem or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies,conceals,or covers up any trick,scheme,or discuises a material fact or makes any false,fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any falx writing or document knowing same to contain any false,fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry,shall be fined not more than$10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both ENG FORM 4345,SEPT 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTI0 14W ONN�E This is intended to supplement ENG Form 4345, Application for Department of the Army Permit, or the Joint Application for Permit used in the State of New York. Please provide complete answers to all questions below which are relevant to your project. Any answers may be continued on separate-sheet(s) of paper to be-attached to this form. PRIVACYACT STATEMENT The purpose of this form is to provide the Corps of Engineers with basic information regarding your project This information will be used to facilitate evaluation of your permit application and for public dissemination as required by regulation. Failure to provide complete information may result in your application being declared incomplete for processing, thereby delaying processing of your application. GENERAL-APPLICABLE TO ALL PROJECTS 1. Explain the need for, and purpose of, the proposed work. This project is to reconstruct a fixed wood pile and timber pier and relocate stairs and landing and reconstruct a wood access ramp which will provide water access for recreational boating. Attached are a detailed narrative and drawings which set forth the full description of the project, construction techniques and methodology, anticipated impacts including environmental aesthetic, usage, navigation and public access. 2. Provide the names and addresses of property owners adjacent to your work site (if not shown on the application form or project drawings). To the north; Sara Ferguson, Sara Boy, 7 Old Pratt Road, Pelham, Ma 01002, to the south; Jabco Limited Partnership, Mr. J Geddes Parsons, Parsons Capital Management Inc. 10 Weybossett St., Suite 106, Providence, RI 02903 (Please note that depng upon the nature and extent ur project, you may be requested to provide names and addresses of additidMi property owners proximate to your project site to ensure proper coordinadon.) 3. Photographs of the project site should be submitted. For projects in tidal areas, photographs of the waterway vicinity should be taken at low tide. Using a separate copy of your plan view, indicate the location and direction of each photograph as well as the date and time at which the photograph- was taken. Provide a sufficient number of photographs so as to provide a clear understanding of conditions on and proximate to your project site. 4. Provide a copy of any environmental impact statement, or any other environmental report which was prepared for your project. See attached narrative. 5. Provide a thorough discussion of alternatives to your proposal. This discussion should include, but not necessarily be limited to, the "no action" alternative and alternative(s) resulting in less disturbance to waters of the United States. For filling projects in waters of the United States, including wetlands, your alternatives discussion should demonstrate that there are no practicable alternatives to your proposed filling and that your project meets with current mitigation policy (i.e-. avoidance, minimization and compensation). See attached narrative. DREDGING PROJECTS Answer the following if your project involves dredging. 1. Indicate the estimated volume of material to be dredged and the depth (below mean low water) to which dredging would occur. Would there be overdepth dredging? There is no dredging associated with this project. 2. You can apply for a ten-year permit for maintenance dredging. If you wish to apply for a ten-year permit, please provide the number of additional dredging events during the ten-year life of the permit and the amount of material to be removed during future events. 3. Indicate of your drawings the dewatering area (if applicable) and disposal site for the dredged material (except landfill sites). Submit a sufficient number of photographs of the tering and disposal sites as acable so as to provide a clear indication of ex ng conditions. For ten-year mai enance dredging permits, indicate the dewatering/disposal sites for future dredging events, if known. 4. Describe the method of dredging (i.e. clamshell, dragline, etc.) and the expected duration of dredging. 5. Indicate the physical nature of the material to be dredged(i.e. sand, silt, clay, etc.) and provide estimated percentages of the various constituents if available. For beach nourishment projects, grain size analysis data is required. 6. Describe the method of dredged material containment (i.e. hay bales, embankment, bulkhead, etc.) and whether return flow from the dewatedng/disposal site would reenter any waterway. Also indicate if there would be any barge overflow. No dredging proposed. MOORING FACILITIES Answer the following if your project includes the construction or rehabilitation of recreational mooring facilities. 1. It is generally recommended that any fixed piers and walk ramps be limited to four feet in width, and that floats be-limited to eight feet in width and rest at least two feet above the waterway bottom at mean low water. Terminal floats at private, non- commercial facilities should be limited to 29 feet in length. If you do not believe your proposal can meet with these recommendations, please provide the reason(s). These criteria can be met as set forth in the attached narrative statement and as depicted in the application drawings. Five feet of pier width is considered necessary for this site in order to maintain dock stability including locating battered bracing piles beneath the structure without interfering with boat berthing alongside. 2. Using your plan view, show to scale the location(s), position(s) and size(s) (including length, beam and draft) of vessel(s) to be moored at the proposed facility, including those of transient vessel(s) if known. 3. For commercial moWg sites such as marinas, indicae capacity of the facility and indicate on the p4mview the location(s) of any projWd fueling and/or sewage pumpout facilities. If pumpout facilities are not planned, p ease discuss the rationale below and indicate the distance to the nearest available pumpout station. This docking facility can accommodate two boats but more often than not,just one, tied up on the side most suitable for berthing based on wind and wave conditions. 4. Indicate on your plan view the distance to adjacent marine structures, if any are proximate and show the locations and dimensions of such structures. The distance to adjacent dock facilities north and south of the site in West Harbor is approximately 300 feet. 5. Discuss the needave protection at the propos cility. Please be advised that if a permit is iss , you would be required to reco a that the mooring facility may be subject to wave action from wakes of passing vessels, whose operations would not be required to be modified. Issuance of a permit would not relieve you of ensuring the integrity of the authorized structure(s) and the United States would not be held responsible for damages to the structure(s) and vessel(s) moored thereto from wakes from passing vessels. Wave protection as this site is not considered to be a necessary or appropriate expense. Wave heights are generally a foot or less and 3 feet during winds of 10 knots to 15 knots, typical of boating conditions at this site. BULKHEADING/BANK STABILIZA TION/FILLING ACTIVITIES Answer the following if your project inclues construction of bullfheading (also - retaining walls and seawalls) with backfill, filling of waters wetlands, or any other bank stabilization fills such as riprap, revetments, gabions, etc. 1. Indicate the total volume of fill (including backfill behind a structure such as a bulkhead) as well as the volume of fill to be placed into waters of the United States. The amount of fill in waters of the United States can be determined by calculating the amount of fill to be placed below the plane of spring high tide in tidal areas and below ordinary high water in non-tidal areas. No filling is proposed. 2. Indicate the source(s) and type(s) of fill material. 3. Indicate the method of fill placement (i.e. by hand, bulldozer, crane, etc.). Would any temporary fills be required in waterways or wetlands to provide access for construction equipment? If so, please indicate the area of such waters and/or wetlands to be filled, and show on the plan and sectional views. Not applicable The foregoing requests basic information on the most common types of projects requiring Department of the Army permits. It is intended to obviate or reduce the need for requesting additional information; however, additional information may be requested above and beyond what is requested in this form. Please feel free to add any additional information regarding your project which you believe may facilitate our review. EFH ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET FOR FEDERAL AGENCIES (modified 08/04) PROJECT NAME: PIER RECONSTRUCTION DATE: February 5,2013 PROJECT NO.: LOCATION: Harrington Property, Fishers Island, NY PREPARER: DOCKO, INC.. Keith B. Neilson, P.E Step 1. Use the Habitat Conservation Division EFH webpage,Guide to Essential Fish Habitat Designations in the Northeastern United States to generate the list of designated EFH for federally-managed species for the geographic area of interest (http://www.noro.noaa.gov/hcd/index2a.htm). Use the species list as part of the initial screening process to determine if EFH for those species occurs in the vicinity of the proposed action. Attach that list to the worksheet because it will be used in later steps. Make a preliminary determination on the need to conduct an EFH Consultation. k3- E� ,,, �Orrl �; Is the action located in or adjacent to EFH designated for eggs? x Is the action located in or adjacent to EFH designated for larvae? x Is the action located in or adjacent to EFH designated for juveniles? x Is the action located in or adjacent to EFH designated for adults? x Is the action located in or adjacent to EFH designated for spawning adults? x If you answered no to all questions above,then EFH consultation is not required -go to Section 5. If you answered yes to any of the above questions proceed to Section 2 and complete remainder of the worksheet. Step 2.In order to assess impacts,it is critical to know the habitat characteristics of the site before the activity is undertaken. Use existing information,to the extent possible,in answering these questions. Please note that, there may be circumstances in which new information must be collected to appropriately characterize the site and assess impacts. RA �er,�'2, s_ r $Ite,C�talbCteri$t)Ce ". u'" a Y DiSCrIp$O i 4 ry1 7 t+ x Is the site intertidal, sub-tidal, or nThis project is to reconstruct an existing pier. The project will water column? encompass parts of the shoreline,the inter-tidal zone and shallow sub-tidal zone approximately 0.1 acres in size.See attached narrative What are the sediment The existing inter-tidal and shallow sub-tidal sediments are coarse characteristics? sand and approximately 25%gravel with occasional exposed stone and two long-standing groins which have become disheveled. Is Habitat Area of Particular The site is an existing cove exposed to prevailing climatic conditions Concern (HAPC) designated at wide open to north, northwest and west winds. The bluff is eroding or near the site? If so what due to exposure to normal tidal and climatic conditions, despite the type,size, characteristics? moderate to heavy vegetative cover. Is there submerged aquatic There is a 10 to 30 foot wide strip of eel grass(SAV) in the shallow vegetation (SAV)at or adjacent sub-tidal waters out to 50 feet beyond the mean low water line but to project site? If so describe there is no SAV detritus on the foreshore. The pier is configured to the spatial extent. clear the SAV.At a height of 8 feet or more above the bottom sediments. What is typical salinity and Salinity varies somewhat seasonally but is typically in the 25-30 ppt. temperature regime/range? Temperature varies seasonally from approximately 30 degrees in the winter to 70 degrees in the summer. What is the normal frequency of Varies seasonally but there is regular boating access to and from the site disturbance, both natural six dock facilities along this stretch of shore. Most boating activity is and man-made? between April and November and is attributable to recreational boating. Storm disturbances are 5 to 10 per year and are usually moderate,occasionally severe. Boating disturbances and construction are minimal. What is the area of proposed Approximately 1110 acre will be directly impacted by this recreational impact(work footprint&far dock project. afield)? Step 3. This section is used to describe the anticipated impacts from the proposed action on the physical/chemical/biological environment at the project site and areas adjacent to the site that maybe affected. £'" ��. �4°n� u", ,'.�'° Sx �s y. t ram ss +�«.:.. e � �'. "n� d � ` �. q •._ ,,� Impa Any Nature and duration of It is anticipated that the adverse impacts from this project will activity(s) be small because of the nature of the work. The project can take place in as little as a week but will likely take a month-tide and weather permitting. Barge access will be at high tide. The pier will be an open wood pile and timber structure. Will benthic community be X The benthic community will be only marginally disturbed by disturbed? the marine construction barge and dock facility. No excavation or"in water"filling is proposed. Will SAV be impacted? X SAV, eel grass has been observed in the project area but the pier has been configured to remain clear of the SAV. Will sediments be altered and/or X Sedimentation rates in the shallow sub tidal zones will not sedimentation rates change? increase as a result of this project. Will turbidity increase? X Turbidity, on a day to day basis,will not change significantly from existing conditions most notably during low tided boating operations. (See attached Narrative Statement) Will water depth change? X No changes in water depth are proposed by or for construction equipment access or for boating operations. Will contaminants be released X plies treated with CCA will release small amounts of arsenic into sediments or water and copper into the water column however the NYS DEC Study column? from 2000 finds those releases acceptable and warranted In view of the need to protect and preserve the marine construction timbers. Will tidal flow, currents or wave X No. The pier will be of open-pile and timber construction. patterns be altered? Will ambient salinity or X This project will have no impact on water-flow and temperature regime change? circulation or drainage and will not affect salinity. Will water quality be altered? X Water quality should not change as to a significant extent as a result of this project beyond the bottom sediment disturbances resulting from marine equipment repositioning. • • Step 4. This section is used to evaluate the consequences of the proposed action on the functions and values of EFH as well as the vulnerability of the EFH species and their life stages. Identify which species from the EFH species list (generated in Step 1) will be adversely impacted from the action. Assessment of EFH impacts should be based upon the site characteristics identified in Step 2 and the nature of the impacts described within Step 3. The Guide to EFH Descriptions webpage(http:/hvww.nero.noaa.gov/hcd/list.htm)should be used during this assessment to determine the ecological parameters/preferences associated with each species listed and the potential impact to those parameters. K, xy. Funct�onsanVaiyu � yea� x �€ Desicribehabafty s` les andllfestia> tib actieel aCt Will functions and values of EFH be impacted for: The shallow sub-tidal zone and Inter-tidal zone are currently sandy Spawning X gravel strewn with stones and boulders and will remain so without regard to this project. No alterations of the benthos or underwater habitat are proposed. This project should have no Impact on submerged aquatic vegetation. Nursery X The shallow sub-tidal zone and Inter-tidal zone are currently sandy gravel with a nearby eel grass fringe colony and will remain so as a result of this project. No alterations of the benthos or underwater habitat are proposed or anticipated. Nursery function should remain unchanged. Forage X The shallow sub-tidal zone and Inter-tidal zone are currently sandy gravel and will remain so as a result of this project. No adverse Impact to submerged aquatic vegetation is anticipated if it does exist In nearby waters. The pier structure piles spanning the water column should provide new habitat and foraging opportunities as barnacles and algae colonize the structure in the water column. Shelter X The shallow sub-tidal zone and Inter-tidal zone are currently sandy gravel and will remain so as a result of this project.No adverse Impact to submerged aquatic vegetation is anticipated.The pier structure and piles do provide shelter for small fish and habitat diversity. It is envisioned that any construction impacts experienced as a result of Will impacts be temporary or this project will be temporary and not permanent but the new structure permanent? spanning the water column will be. The area of coverage of the proposed piles Is small compared to the area of the cove and of no consequence compared to the overall fringe habitat and coastal shoreline of Fishers Island. Will compensatory mitigation be X No compensatory mitigation is proposed for this project. Approximately 500 SF of land will be covered by a structure. used? Approximately 750 SF of Intertidal and shallow sub-tidal,stony,gravelly sand sediments will be covered by the pier. All of these features are natural and similar to adjacent shoreline characteristics along Fishers Island's coastal perimeter. It Is envisioned that the more stable boulders will continue to accumulate sediments and encourage tidal wetlands vegetation to grow,as opposed to the adjacent open waters and high beach with Its wave damage tendencies. Step 5. This section provides the Federal agency--s determination on the degree of impact to EFH from the proposed action. The EFH determination also dictates the type of EFH consultation that will be required with NOAA Fisheries. �rsa+` � ^'�.� �e e s { .s� ��, '. n� r'ry-'. "t K 7 f s w9° i9 'r .;•i7d � .! �a r s Fedora AgBnc - E�if ETet �tniitati�i , 4 ���"�' i.' �"��"' X There is no adverse effect on EFH Overall degree of EFH Consultation is not required adverse effects on EFH (not Including The adverse effect on EFH is not substantial. compensatory mitigation)will be: This is a request for an abbreviated EFH consultation.This worksheet is being submitted to NMFS to satisfy the EFH (check the appropriate Assessment requirement. statement) The adverse effect on EFH is substantial. This is a request for an expanded EFH consultation. A detailed written EFH assessment will be submitted to NMFS expanding upon the impacts revealed in this worksheet. Step 6. Consultation with NOAA Fisheries may also be required if the proposed action results in adverse impacts to other NOAA-trust resources,such as anadromous fish,shellfish,crustaceans,or their habitats. Some examples of other NOAA-trust resources are listed below. Inquiries regarding potential Impacts to marine mammals or threatenediendangered species should be directed to NOAA Fisheries' Protected Resources Division. a Mf �Prf P Chem C� Ot. O disrdA lo* ofs A n andCor dav�io ment habrita )ujverti alrsit�ts�gfhbrat�iaf�a �` ft P� � egg. " P ma)tapPl . yandlOva ctul[fbsdin orini a lorli i�6itat� 'q „ !' alewife blueback herring rainbow smelt Atlantic sturgeon Atlantic menhaden American shad American eel Physical Changes, not disruptive American lobster Physical Changes, not disruptive blue mussels Physical Changes, not disruptive soft-shell clams quahog Physical Changes, not disruptive, no adverse Impact Otherspecies: -__ ?4N-.taiGf 7_ lT _ yy��W Y Ry �o 30 n E..t �Clump BJ35 30 p \ \\ d2 i 8 Pi �2 : I I.na. 27 In * *. 6 t p * * Huf O i ac -- 01.1 16\31 lot tl � c I * iIs � 49 u Is . nd PJ nd / j -_ r 21 10, 79 � c _ 1 (b - -- rr* LOCATION MAP l 6 s I / d 15 / V Project: "PIER RECONSTRUCTION" i - Location: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK Waterway: FISHERS ISLAND SOUND / _ = Date: NOVEMBER 26,2012 Applicant: HARRINGTON FAMILY PARNTERSHH' eo Agent: DOCKO,INC. -- - FISHERS ISLAND SOUND 0 / � 6 xuml 4- a u ua V ee to ° xlam le a !.l! ! 16x1 !da x!M[1 I] ua Q1 u xu > aI.TA 72 v � rro R Lv O I 14.1a.t UA •a, y� ua 1! b a uA1ci w oxy ° o �, > odx a ° � z o ro — �....•�. -- «— �. . w — -- uMes ..X XIlwel. u rmncE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Q K aN6 SWT .X! X 1. •d.a.w: orsrXC1. E w �- •�° — '— -->�•w — °— m YMIWR.MIWt!l,S W Red Property Tax Service Agency y w.aXX.w —-a—- rrXar�.X,u° —nr—- nouXr oaIXBuliox n ax1 calla 6 M Canty Center AlvwtoA M T UqK vola 6 • �_� Wni.h.Yn —_l—_ Wrt.iwkl Yi.—_a—_ Pa 6VM voltl CYMR IIX WP6NYdlFD Y4EMREI� 4 M anti N. -v _ ISMwr 4•Xa.LL.—aa—- uOlreF >tNMli al aIIXOY!lNi1FX PEPo65W Oi M > A A m1 eLL11C1 In Taa� e[M eXO "In XX MaL+. P N n J `9. m iiia �pa O~ v 4 12 112 1. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © s o Rmo..nPtuxM TU Semen Popm.Y 0 James F. King,President f�V C�G�I P.O. Bov 1179 Bob Ghosio„Ir-.Vice-President �� f Southold NY 11971 Dave Bergen p Telephone 1631 765-1892 John Bredemeyer 1i, u. T• Fax(63 1)765-6641 Michael.1 Domino -V w y� ani' Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection/Worksession Report Date/Time: /4Y/c- 6- z i3 Docko, Inc. on behalf of DAVID HARRINGTON requests a Pre-Submission Inspection to remove an existing deteriorated pier and construct a 148± LF of 5ft. wide fixed wood pile and timber pier including four batter braced tie-off piles and ladders waterward of the apparent high water line; relocate 4ft. wide stairs with a new 5ft. x 4ft. fixed landing and reconstruct an existing wood access ramp landward of the apparent high water line. Located: Off East End Road, Fishers Island. SCTM# 2-1-12 Tyye of area to be impacted: f- _Saltwater Wetland _Freshwater Wetland t/Sound _Bay Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: _Chapt.275 Chapt. 111 other Type of Application: ✓(Netland _Coastal Erosion _Amendment _Administrative_Emergency Pre-Submission Violation Info needed: Modifications: d2 /- 0 y CF Conditions: Present Were: /J. Kin B. Ghosio D. Bergen, %-/ J. Bredemeyer Michael Domino D. Dzenkowski other Form filled out in the field by Mailed/Faxed to: Date: Docko, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,CT 06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:permits7docko.com NMr. James King Southhold Board of Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 RE: Harrington Site Visit Dear Mr. King, Following up on your email of February 21, 2013, I would like to request a site visit for the property of Mr. David Harrington located at 2695 Windsheild Drive, for a new ramp and float. The purpose of this project is to remove an existing deteriorated pier and construct a 148 (+/-) LF of 5-FT wide fixed wood pile and timber pier including four batter braced tie-off piles and ladders waterward of the apparent high water line. Relocate 4-FT wide stairs with a new 5-FT X 4-FT fixed landing and reconstruct an existing wood access ramp landward of the apparent high water line. Enclosed you will find a drawing for Mr. Harrington's project, a check in the amount of$50.00 for the site inspection, and authorization from Mr. Harrington for the Board to go onto the property for an inspection. Please do not hesitate to contact our office with any additional questions and I look forward to hearing from you. Yours Truly, Docko, Incorporated Keith B.Neilson, P.E. February 26, 2013 Mr. Keith B.Neilson, P.E. Docko Incorporated P.O. Box 421 Mystic, CT 06355 RE: Town of Southold Site Visit 2695 Windshield Drive, Fishers Island Dear Mr. Neilson, I am aware that you are trying to schedule a site visit with the Town of Southold Board of Trustees at my property located at 2695 Windshield Drive on Fishers Island. This letter shall serve as my authorization for you and any or all of the Town of Southold Board members to visit my site for inspection. Thank you, PC? l David Harring EECIVE D 2013 D own 6 10 f2 FISHERAN S ISLAND SOUND N FLr�HERS ISL�NDr�- OUND i y Y 12 13 19 a P 3i i Q T 1 li n 31 n N1 SITE •- II „ 1 b 33 19 is I is 16 u m 1130 Y 5 13 16 0 5 { 1 19 Qal 10 1 I6 „ 16 , ^ N/F PROPERTY OF . 465 I) 6 {}0' FERGUSON MUSEUM--"� i3u 'I6T' WEST HARBOR ` t F ~•. ,-� �/,1Pp ,• li 13 a 3 J'F w�Nr i o u3 PROPERTY Of HARRINGTON LOCATION MAP REFERENCE CHART:12372 GRAPHIC SCALE 1000 O 1000 IN YARDS NOTES: PROJECT PIER ,�5 „ REGONSTRUCTION N � 7.ELEVATION DATUM IS APPARENT LOW WATER (ALWL)' 2.TIDE DATA 15 TAKEN FROM 2012 NOAA TIDE TABLES REFERENCE:SILVER EEL COVE BASED ON N/F PROPERTY OF NEW LONDON,CT. JABCO LIMITED 3.PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PARTNERSHIP --�• _ CONSTRUCT 148r.L.F OF SFT WIDE FRED WOOD RLE AND TIMBER PER INCLUDING FOUR BATTER BRACED TIE-OFF PI1 F-5 AND LADDERS WATERWARD OF THE t - APPARENT HIGH WATER LINE.RELOCATE 4-FT WIDE F ' STAIRS WITH A NEW 5-FT X 4-FT FIXED LANDING { AND RECONSTRUCT AN EXISTING WOOD AGGF55 RAMP LANDWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER — LINE. 4 4.PROJECT PURPOSE Fl.��"HER.��' 1-�' LAND• THIS IS A PRIVATE DOCK FOR RECREATIONAL BOATING. TOWN of SOUTHOLD ' 5.THESE APPLICATION DRAWINGS REPRESENT A COMPILATION OF SURVEYS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT PURPOSES.THEY ARE NOT CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.TOWN BUILDING PERMIT(S) MAY BE REQUIRED. 6.ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: O�/HRALL PLAN NORTH: SOUTH: GRAPHIC SCALE 1'=300' H.L FERGUSON MUSEUM JACOB LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ' ATTN:ROBERT MILLER J GEDDES PARSONS •-- 300 apo 1CO 0 300 DAY PITNEY LLP PARSONS CAPITAL KNI AGMENT ING ONE GANTERBURY GREEN 10 WEYBOSSET STREET SUITE 106 STAMFORD,CT 06901 PROVIDENCE,RI 02903 PROJECT: PIER REGONSTRUCTION LOCATION: Fl5HERS ISLAND- TOWN of SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK RWAY: FlSHERS ISLAND SOUND E I V E NOVEMBER 26.2012 6 D 0 C K U DANT: DAVID HARRINGTON T: SHEET 1 OF 4 \ MAA - 5 2013 p GKO, ING. Kel B.Nellson,PE 0 R PO R �' Mys GT 06355 Southold Town 8 572 8939 FAX 860 572 7569 DWG, 12-07-2422 BoaTd of Tr F-KAIL permltsQdo ka wm KeNh B.Nelson,Doc4o Inc. 2 912013 330 GM Harringron-Camv�ll l.dwg N FI.��-I--fEFZS ISL_�.ND I I ��-OIJND m 1 c 1 PROPERTY of SOMEONE I O s MEAN HIGH WAI APPARENT HIGH WATER I UNE(MHW)El— LINE(AHWL)EL=33 cp APPARENT LOW WATER tl I S I COASTAL EROSION bl UNE(ALWL)EL=0.0—) Sy 'PI I`HAZARD LINE oFTnDAIMATEUMIT Il n I � OF IDAL WETLANDSI ROCKY BEACH(7YP) IREMAINS OF DOCK S7RUCTURE RILE� OLD DOCK EL=8.01 ; I' I BOULDER(TYP) I r' I BENGHMPRK IRON ROD EL 15.43 REMAINS�F DOCK STR 12E �/ 1 I I Ip ) I OLD DOCK =7.7x LI I I WOOD STET )GRASS 13Y0 BOULDER f � � I I � WOOD RAMP IEELG BED ,i f LOCATED 16-18-202 1 >, BOULDER "p) II I Fj p I I I �PARTINAIALTERNI i RA� I� ' ROCKY BEACH yy // SOI C cY I 1 N 4816.0 W 6719 'b'wrt t� h '3i.+`5 r `•` 1nµ � "'^ SPARTINAALTERNIFLORA� t > + .. TOP OF BANK AND NYSDEG.`.„ N/F PROPERTY OF.=' JURISDICTIONAL UNE ``may;�JABGO LIMITED "`�'" ", 67, E>GISTIIVGr � 5PARTNERSHIP cam' GOfVI71TIOIV�� . ` r SURVYARC ENGINEER NG Y LAND SURVEYING E HTEGTURE,PLLG 's:^ GRAPHIC SCALE 1'=40' IF 40 20 0 40 PROJECT: PIER RECONSTRUCTION LOCATION: FISHERS ISLAND- TOWN of SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK WATERWAY: ROVERS ISLAND SOUND -(rl, DATE NOVEMBER 26,2012 � ,p 0 C j{ 0 APPUCANT DAVID HARRINGTON AGENT: SHEET 2 OF 4Keit B.Neilson, R P 0 Mys Mystic,GT 063555 860 572 8939 FAX 860 572 7569 DWG 12-07-2422 EMAIL permltss docko.com Keiffi B.Neilson,Docko Inc. 2/19/2013 331 PM Harrington-Compbell_2.dwg I SURVEY by GME ENGINEERING, Na LAND SURVEYING$ARGHTECTURE,PLLG I SL_�IV D z d OL ° A➢PARENT HIGH WATER UNE(Al-M1VL)EL=33' MEAN HIGH WATER I s � UNE(MHWj EL= 25 / APPARENT LOW WATER I 1 LINE(ALWL)EL=0.0 APPROXIMATE LIMY OF EXISTING PILE TO BE REMOVED Ml:') TIDAL 1 / NEW BATTER BRACED ROCKY BEACH(TMP) B I I TOP OF BANK AND NYSDEG 1 1 I�I NEW LADDER(7YP) I JURISDICTIONAL UNE I r _{-155iFrBOULDER(1YP, SLOpE 5-F7 WIDE�A NEW PILE SUPPORTED ER AHWL 1, END DECK EL 0± 16sFT CLE9e M.I o 15.43 I I NEW SUPPORT PILE(TYP) : I I NEW 5-Ff X 4-FT PLATFORM"ft RAILS / I 30 BPULD lal ' " I I ' 9 � RELOCATED 37PJR5�I I RAMP I ''II''-- n u EESSBED LOCATE10-18-2012 BOULDER(TYP) PARTINA \ I I I I AL*RNIFLORA ROCKY I I IBEACH ?) BcTpom OF BANK I g 0 N/F PROPERTY OF PLAN \/IE=W PARnNAALTERNiFLORA „ 'JABGO LIMITED§ GRFWFiIC sO,aF 1'=30 PARTNERSHIP, 30 20 10 0 30 PROJECT: PIER RECONSTRUCTION LOGAMON: FISHERS ISLAND- TOWN oP SOUTHOLD SUFFOLKN NEW YORK WATERWAY: HERS ISLAND SOUND NO DATE NOVEMBER 26,2012 � 9 0 C K O , APPUGANT: DAVID HARRINGTON AGENT: SHEET 3 OF 4 _ DOGKO, ING. :ft ` Kehh B.Neilson,PE 0 RP 0 R �' Mystic.CT 06355 860 572 8939 FAX 860 572 7569 DWG 12-07-2422 EMAIL permltsOda ko.c Keith B.Neilwn.D°c Inc. 2/19/2013 332 PM Harrington-Camptell�B.dwg NEW BATTER BRACED TIE-OFF PILE TOP EL 17xFT -- SFT --y DECK WIDTHNEW 5-FT WIDE RER END NEW BATTER BRACED DECK EL rrFT SUPPORT PILE TOP EL 4sFT--..I ABOVE DECK(Tl'P) I I, -INEW SPLIT CLAMP and _- CRO55 BR-GE(TSP) _' il fl MHW— — .'d III and SAND 1 -J+ v x I E=1VD N�/1EE\A/ GRAPHC SCALE 1'=30' 30 20 10 O 30 w6tFT NEW 5-FT X 4-F7 NEW BATTER BRACED TIE-OFF NEW 5-FT WIDE PIER STAIR LANDING PILE-TOP EL 17+_FT(TYP) BEGINNING DECK EL BxFT RAMP NEW RAILS(TYP) TO BE REBUILT END DECK EL 6:FT ��9ry MAXIMUM SLOPE 10:1 I _ ANWLJHTL � '" I .. - MHW 25 - RELOCATE ALWL O.O— ..:: - .:.,:.'STAIRS TO BEACH .. _ ROCKS MM `BOTTOM IllEhffS: NEW BATTER BRACED SUPPORT PILE- NEWLADDER(Tl'P) GRAVEL ff SAND TOP EL 41FTABOVE DECK(TMP) PFZO FI LE GRAPHIC SCALP 1'=30' 30 20 10 O 30 PROJECT: PIER RECONSTRUCTION LOCATION: FSHERS ISLAND- TOWN of SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK SLANTS,NEW YORK WATERWAY: F15NOVEMBER o, SOUND DATE: NOVEMBER 26,2012 � ,fl 0 C K0 APPLICANT: DAVID HARRINGTON AGENT: SHEET 4 OF 4 AQ DOGKO, ING_ Kehh B.Neilson,PE 0 R P 0 R P Mystic,CT 06355 860 572 8939 FAX 860 572 7569 DWG 12-07-2422 EMAIL pe rnrtsgdocko.wrn Keith B.Neilson,Docko Inc. 2/19/2013 333 R'I Harring+onCampbell_4.dwg , k f , w I yy — odo N 0 Vie' w _ FE i 13 12— _ __ _ _ —� 0.0 —_ —_ Norka COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © : v wmm n 1211l R..l PmMhy TuT mmA a cx�x r Docko, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,CT 06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:permfts@docko.com July 22,2013 p CEIVE D Mr.James King, President JUL 2 4 2013 Southold Board of Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold Towri L Board of Trustoos Southold,NY 11971 RE: Harrington Family Ltd. Partnership Revised Plans Dear Mr. King: We are transmitting herewith the revised plans for the Harrington Family Ltd. Partnership which shows the use of thru-flow grate decking, per the conditions of approval. The final inspection fee that was also requested has been previously mailed. Please do not hesitate to contact our office if the need for any additional information is requested. As always, thank you for your assistance and we look forward to the issuance of the permit. Yours Truly, Docko Incorporated 4�- OkL J'&" Keith B. Neilson,P.E. TW CC: Harrington DEC; Claire Werner ACOE; Michael Scarano, P.E. FILE: 12-07-2422 OFFICE LOCATION: MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Faze: 631 765-3136 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM HD ,LEE VE IJTo: Jim Kin President 13g' 0Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Ter Princi al Planner n _ Terry, P f Trustees LWRP Coordinator Date: June 17, 2013 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review for HARRINGTON FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, c/o DAVID HARRINGTON SCTM# 1000-2-1-12 Docko, Inc. on behalf of HARRINGTON FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, c/o DAVID HARRINGTON requests a Wetland Permit and a Coastal Erosion Permit to reconstruct ±138LF of 5' wide fixed wood pile and timber pier including four batter braced tie-off piles and ladders waterward of the apparent high water line; relocate 4' wide stairs with a new 5'x4' fixed landing and reconstruct an existing ±3.5' x ±34' wood access ramp landward of the apparent high water line. Located: Private Road on Clay Point Road, Fishers Island. SCTM# 2-1-12 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposal is INCONSISTENT with LWRP Policies 4.1 (below) and therefore, INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. 4.1 Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards. The following management measures to minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards are suggested: A. Minimize potential loss and damage by locating development and structures away from flooding and erosion hazards. 1. Avoid development other than water-dependent uses in coastal hazard areas. Locate new development which is not water-dependent as far away from coastal hazard areas as practical. a. No development is permitted in natural protective feature areas, except as specifically allowed under the relevant portions of 6 NYCRR 505.8. A portion of the proposed dock is within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area (CEHA). All development is prohibited in the nearshore area pursuant to § 111-11. unless specifically provided for by Chapter 111, COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREAS. Pursuant to § 111-6, allowable activities in these areas may include open timber piles or other similar open work supports with a top surface area of less than 200 square feet which are removed in the fall of each year. Therefore, the dock, as proposed, is prohibited in the nearshore area pursuant to Chapter 111, COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREAS as it is greater than 200 square feet and not removable. In the event that the action is improved it is recommended that an alternative to CCA pressure-treated pilings for the dock structure are required. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney Office Use Only nn XCoastal Erosion Permit Application Wetland PermitApplication Administrative Permit Amendment/Pransfer/Extension Received Application:Received Fee:$ G 4Completed Application / Incomplete _SEQRA Classification: Type I_Type H Unlisted_ Coordination:(date sent) LWRP Consistency As sme t Form / 3 CAC Referral Sent: /3 Date of Inspection: _Receipt of CAC Repo _Lead Agency Determination: _Technical Review: Public Hearing Held: Resolution: Name of Applicant Harrington Family Limited Partnership C/o David Harrington Address 70 Rocky Hill Road, Chadds Ford, PA. 19317 Phone Number:( ) 978-505-9277 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000- 2-1-12 Property Location: Privates Rnari an Clay Point (clay Point Road) (provide LILCO Pole#, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: Docko, Inc. Mr. Keith Neilson, P.E. (If applicable) Address: P.O. Box 421, Mystic , CT 06355 Phone: 860-572-8939 �ard of Trustees Applicati• GENERAL DATA Land Area (in square feet): 2 acres approximately 90, 000 SF Area Zoning: Residential Previous use of property: Private Residential Intended use of property: Private-Residential Covenants and Restrictions: Yes No If"Yes", please provide copy. Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals Yes __X_No If"Yes", please provide copy of decision. Will this project require any demolition as per Town Code or as determined by the Building Dept. Yes _No Does the structure (s) on property have a valid Certificate of Occupancy Yes )LNo Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date X No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description(use attachments if necessary): The prosect is to reconstruct 138 (+/-)LF of 5-FT wide fixed wood pile and timber pier including four batter braced tie-off piles and ladders waterward of the apparent high water line. Relocate 4-FT wide stairs with a new 5-FT X 4-FT fixed landing and reconstruct an existing wood access ramp landward of the apparent high water line. 0 Cantrell Elizabeth From: office@docko.com Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 9:31 AM To: Cantrell, Elizabeth Subject: Harrington Importance: High Hello Elizabeth, The dimensions for the proposed wood access ramp are 3 1/2 (+/-)FT x 34(+/-) FT. Please let us know if you will need any additional information. Regards, Tina A. Wazny Docko Incorporated Office (860) 572-8939 Fax (860) 572-7569 www.docko.com t "Roard of Trustees Application WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: R - .onctr u .t 148 (+/-) LF of.9-FT wide fix d wood pile and timber pier including four batter braced tie-off piles and ladders waterward of the apparent high water line. Relocate 4-FT wide stairs with a new 5-FT X 4-FT fixed landing and reconstruct an existing wood access ramp landward of the apparent hight water line. Area of wetlands on lot: None square feet Percent coverage of lot: n % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: N/A feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: no change feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? --No Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated? cubic yards How much material will be filled? cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Not applicable Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): This project is reconstruction of a deteriorated longstanding wood pile and timber pier. It is envisioned that environmental impacts will be minimal. Please see attached narrative. 0 Board of Trustees Application COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity: This is a private dock for recreational boating. Are wetlands present within 100 feet of the proposed activity? -- X No Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? )f No No Yes If Yes, how much material will be excavated (cubic yards) How much material will be filled? (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts to the subject property or neighboring properties reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed, including erosion increase or adverse effects on natural protective features. (Use attachments if necessary) This project is pier reconstruction; It is envisioned that the environmental impacts will be minimal. Please see attached narrative. • • Board of Trustees Application County of Suffolk State of New York Harrington Family Partnership BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S)AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS AP LICATION. Signature Mr. David Harrington SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS , �= DAY OF Notary Public SHAREN BAKER Notary Public-State of Delaware Mlycomm, F ,, iF ?01? Board of Trustees Application AUTHORIZATION (where the applicant is not the owner) I Harrington Family Partnership residing at 2695 Windsheild Drive (print owner of property) (mailing address) P.O. Box 532, Fishers Island do hereby authorize Docko, Inc. (Agent) to apply for permit(s) from the Southold Board of Town Trustees on my behalf. 0—�) T1 / 4A.1 (Owner's signature) Mr. David Harrington Dooko, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,CT 06355(860)572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:permits@docko.com June 10, 2013 dal 11 3 Mr. James King, President i Southold Board of Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY NY 11971 Re: Harrington Family Limited Partnership, Fishers Island Dear Mr. King: Attached is a copy of the Proof of mailing notices and the original Affidavit of Posting with photograph for the Harrington Family Limited partnership on Fishers Island for the upcoming town meeting on June 19, 2013. i i Yours truly, DOCKO, INC. CAL-� I Cindy Bayreuther G f i CB: cb Attachments r File: 12-07-2422 CAMPBELL c' • �o�OgpFFD(kcOGy • a lames P. ging. President N � lbtin I lall_33093 Main Rd. Bob GhosioJr. _V icc-President PRO. [los 1179 DaveBergen �'�` Southold-NY 11971 John BredemeNer I elephone(631)763-1892 Michael J. Domino 1 �' Fax(63 1)763-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD J "4 1 1 2013 BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUT}{OLD xn1ju-x w—n .. _ ..io?Tru In the Matter of the Application of HARRINGTON FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP c/o DAVID HARRINGTON COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING TO BE COMPLETED AFTER POSTING REMAINS IN PLACE FOR EIGHT DAYS 1, 1&4441 8 )-It,l 1�Z,-, residing at /dba being du yl sworn, depose and say: That on the (p day of .J t.c L1, - 2013, 1 personally posted the pro erty known as i}arar1L-%-n 4 xjcj I H ca 1 (xcsiud o#a� Wvxd-f Qcl m rtshetsTsla�� by placing the Board of trustees official poster where it can easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for eight days prior to the date of the public hearing. Date of hearing noted thereon to be held Wednesday, June 19, 2013. Dated: (signature) Sworn to before me this 7-fLday t11120 /3 otary Public PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: Address: Jabco Limited Partnership Parsons Capital Management Inc. 10 Weybosset Street, Ste. 106, Providence, RI 02903 Ferguson H L Museum Day Pitney LLP, One Canterbury Green Attn: Robert J Miller VP Stamford, CT 06901 M E 6 V rn1 Harrington Family Limited Partnership C/o David Harrington D J 70 Rocky Hill Road R Chadds Ford, PA 09317 JUN 1 1 2013 Southold Town I Board of STATE OF CONNECTICUT COUNTY OF NEW LONDON DOCKO, INC. , residing at 14 HOLMES STREET, MYSTIC, CT 06355, being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the cq1j5— day of , 2013, deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Ap lication, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at MYSTIC, CT, that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (registered) mail. CA- , Sworn to before me this TFL Day of 20 I-L3 Notary Pu � GS or� 4F ol 40 - Y' c ! -r. NOTICE • NOTICE 15 HEREBY GIVEN th., SO�H W BOARD OF TRUSTEE.. ,.yam • O• _. OWNERjS)OFREC t- UrTrOF PUBLIC HEARING. J�ae 19.2013 BOARD• ; y NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, concerning this property. d OWNER(S) OF RECORD: RXr4n0';S1hp c/v�►v�di�b�lr;ln��+o�, SUBJECT OF PUBLIC HEARING: Reconstruct ±138LF of 5' wide fixed wood pile and timber pier including four batter braced tie-off piles and ladders waterward of the apparent high water line; relocate 4' wide stairs with a new 5'x4' fixed landing and reconstruct an existing ±3.5' x ±34' wood access ramp landward of the appafent hili water line. TIME & DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: 40 may, .dune 19, aor 3 . ad-or aw+ s:3c� If you have an interest in this project, you are invited to view the Town file(s) which are available for inspection rior to the day of the hearing during normal business days between the hours ofp8 a.m and .4 p.m. BOARD OF TRUSTEES * TOWN OF SOUTHOLD * (631 ) 765- 1892 Town of Southold ® Erosion, Sedimentation & Storm-Water Run-off ASSESSMENT FORM PROPERTY LOCATION: s.C.T.N.r. THE FOLLOMM ACTIONS MAY REQUIRE THE SUBMISSION OF A �UOO I STORM•WAT ORADIN0.DRAINAGE AND EROSIO CONTROL PLAN TTilrl� �e'e� OEW ED BY A MalUn FKUFMMIOPML IN THETA OWNW-Y-ORX SCOPE OF WORK - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION TEEM p / WORKASSESSMENT Yea No a. What is the Total Area of the Project Parcels? WIN this Project Retain AN SOotm-Water Run-OR — (Include Total Area of all Parcels located within Generated by a Two(2'Inch Rhffidall on Ske? the Scope of Work for Proposed Construction) El(s.F,rAmm) (This Item will Include air run-off crested by site b. What b the Total Area of Land Clearing clearing and/or construction activities as well as all and/or Ground Disturbance for the proposed Site Improvements and the permanent creation of construction activity (aF.Marm) Impervious surfaces.) Z Doan Site Plan and/or Sway Show All PROVmE BRW PROJECT DESCRIPTION (FA-M.AalawhFepm-rwri 4 Drainage Structures Indicating Size&Location?This proposed Item shall Include all Proposed Grade Charges and [l a tn,? v5•FI" hied- Slopes ConboEng Surface Water Flow.YlA1i 3 Does the Site Ran and/or Survey describe the erosion weCLt Pr IL CLK - "bee_. D r u L VA"JaAll and sediment control practices that w8 be used to — c7 conbol eke erosion and storm water discharges. This Lf b•_1ki bl-a u ti hii- o i 0 p l ks tx y- ' Item must be maintained throughout On Construction ' 'e� Construction Period. _l Aa d dln_4 b3a•�dl L &q d- O(Ask.. aP andel- 4 WM this Projec Require any Land Filing.Grading or �P iD rt Excavation Where Mere is a change to the Nalu d 4-FrW t LEAS Existing Grads Involving more than 200 Cubic Yards of Material within any Parcel? w,�G, Ac uur 6Fr v �+ Fr �,vrt�[anAtn 5 WE this Application Require Land Disturbing AhdlWtles fJ ilia lrnS�u Q./l Q+h S/7/)G� lt)dod Qrfe SS Encompassing an Area In Excess of Five Thousand — `' " (5,000 S.F.)Square Feet of Ground Surface? kV-L p L"Atum A- 6 wA- Ir.i,{1 wL4et. 6 Is Mere a Natural Water Course Running through tiro SRO? Is this Project within the Trustees jurisdiction — general DEC SWPP R.sru.m.nr: or within One Hundred(1017)feet of a Wetland or Submission of a SWPPP Is mghi I for Be Care rucam edvNm Md ft ad Beach dlNabarwee uttas(1)amaeseak ih WkVdWubr afkm#mam Mel Will Mere be Site am Pend a larger common plan Mm wil hhI bey dlaasb one a mom sem a IahM 7 preparation(15)feet ton Existing Grade Slopes uhduako ComuLcom WNW"iwaiihp ed dbeshanw d lam t=ane(i)ova Aims whets Exceed 1W)Fifteo(15)feet al Vertical Rbc b the DEC has determined!that a SPOES i mme la required air alrm wa0sdldmrgsa one Hundred(tar)of Horizontal Distance? I avIPPP's arrd meet tis Wnheaw R.gdr.mnr of do SPDEe General lewnYt 8 WB Driveways,Parking Areae or other Impervbus for alarm Warr Discharges/ram emmouelka aetivlgh•IN Na SPo-lsast.) Surfaces be Sloped to Direct Stam►Water Run-0rt 1.The SWPPP she/be gepred prior to tis Submittal of the IDI.The NOI and be Into andkr In the direction of a Town right-of-we subralad to to Depamrma prior In In c mmnmrmntof mwbucnon @N*. 2.The SWPPP ghat daWoxes ilia era"and sediment mmol preak.e red where 9 Will this Project Require the Plmxanerd of Material. reghid,patimmti,amn atom watt mmepmaw predaa east we be used and/or Removal of Vegetation ardMr to Construction of any ❑ — constructed to radum tis paarlyds la slam water discharges and b mature Item Within the Town RIght-cf-Way or Road Shoulder mnpllanc�e with Me tanen s d aodsd ons this parrs.bh addition.Ma SWPPP deal Ama7lnds e-rwxmnAeNs Identify peladeta ses of Pct 1, which may mason"be expected b affect is quwy d srom waardWd arges. ams: IIAwy Aweamm Qumasm em#nMh Nhs b Anwawmd w1M a Chock Mwk s.AeaWPPPWthin require#0palernmhction@mmwater rr a"mmpradla ere Sewwed amwwadmatlaeaft dlaseu.melabvweenSAM V.AIpveInw % mnpamn deed be prepared bye gaN4d Deep PmrmabnS Uamd In New Yam a Ste^^W�•dew DleI - a 6wlm ebrmd plan leri . 4 an ream of dwblaowldgmbbihtrpmrkMW adpredkesdslwmi eu MrsPnmht sedhwldd Madba SuhmaW M Re Mw Ricanhaem%maNry Sut3q Pa'& ORM At7wd Mdh(4)radlarMmw-rre OundMieR wet rare CwrONrApoko h) STATEOFPi g GT COUNTYOF...REW._F.4.N. KISS I �:�!,..... n GI I sin ...........................being duly swum,deposes and says that he/she is the applicant for Permit, :�:!.1.._�:............_............_.. (tint dlaadarr siphihp Dwamrm) Andthat he/she is the ...................... ......................................................................................................................... (Omer,Cawmlor,Awe/.tkrpame DBcw,eIe) Owner and/or representative of the Owner or Owners,and is dtdy authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application;that all statements contained in this application arc true to the bestof his knowledge and belief;and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed herewith Sworn to beforeme this; //�j ......�Y.4r 6. day of........f1..2 Rtv Notary Public: .... V. . ... ........... ` ....... (SlgnWpWd d Appleme) FORM - WO 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently,there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. it is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is Intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and Information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data,It assists a reviewer In the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact Is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE-- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: 13 Part 1 11 Part 2 Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 If appropriate), and any other supporting information,and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ®A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant Impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* C. The project may result in one or more large and Important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions _ Pier R nnatructinn Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in lead Agency gnature o arer( di Brent from responsi le officer) website ate Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form,Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Fier Reconstruction Location of Action(Include Street Address,Municipality and County) Harrington property off Private Road (Clay Point Road)on Fishers Island Name of Applicant/Sponsor Harrington Family Partnership Address C/o David Harrington, 70 Rocky Hill Road City/PO Chadds Ford State PA Zip Code 09317 Business Telephone g7q_5nt; Name of Owner(if different) Address City/PO State Zip Code Business Telephone Description of Action: The project is to construct 138 (+/-)LF of 5-FT wide fixed wood pile and Umber pier including four batter braced Ue-off piles and ladders waterward of the apparent high water line. Relocate 4-FT wide stairs with a new 5-FT X 4-FT fixed landing and reconstruct an existing wood access ramp landward of the apparent high water line. Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Resent Land Use:©Urban Industrial Commercial Residential (suburban) Rural (non-farm) Forest Agriculture Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 2.1 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTERCOMPLErION Meadow or arushland(Non-agricultural) n ag acres 0.63 acres Forested 0.63 acres 0.63 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0.63 acres 0.63 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roark, buildings and other paved surfaces 0.21 acres n91 acres Other(Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s)on project site? Gravel a. Soil drainage: ®Well drained _% of site ❑Moderately well drained_% of site. ❑Poorly drained _% of site b. if any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Gassification System? acres(see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? [:] Yes ® No a. What is depth to bedrock (in feet) S. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: F-10-10%-2D—% ❑10- 15% 30 % E] 15% or greater 50 % 6. Is project substantialiv contiguous to or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? Yes M No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Yes ®No 8. What is the depth of the water table? 1n, (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes ®No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist In the project area? Yes No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Oyes ®No According to: Identify each species: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes,other geological formations? []yes ®No Describe: E-- 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes ®No If yes, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑yes ®No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: None a Name of Stream and name of Fiver to which it is tributary 16- takes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area None b. Sim(in acres): Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ®Yes ❑No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ®Yes ❑No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ❑Yes 1ZNo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes ®No 19. Is the site located in or substantial) contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617?[]YesWNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 2.1 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 0.1 acres initially; 0.1 acres ultimately. C. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 1.90 acres, d. Length of project, in miles: 150 LF(if appropriate) e. M the project Is an expansion, Indicate percent of expansion proposed. I, Number of off-street parking spaces existing proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: N/A (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 1 existing Ultimately 1 retain i. Dimensions (in feet)of largest proposed structure: height; width; length. J. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.)will be removed from the site? tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed Oyes ®No ❑N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ®No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ® No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers)will be removed from site? none acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old)or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ®Yes ❑ No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction:_2 months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a Total number of phases anticipated (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: month year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑ Yes ❑ No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes ®No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 3 ; after project is complete a 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project f) 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?❑Yes ®No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal Involved? ❑Yes ®No a If yes, indicate type of waste(sewage, industrial, etc)and amount b. Name of water body Into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal Involved? ❑Yes ®No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal?❑Yes F&]No It yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ®Yes No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ❑Yes ®No a 9 yes, what is the amount per month? tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used?❑Yes ❑No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Oyes No Page 6 of 21 e. if yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? []Yes ®No a. if yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month, b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ©Yes ®No 19. Will project routinely produce odors(more than one hour per day)? ❑Yes®No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ®Yes[]No 21. Will project result In an increase in energy use? ❑Yes lia No If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 5(+/_) gallonstminute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 10(+/-)gailons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ❑Yes ® No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board Yes ❑No _Tnwn of Rnuthnid Fahniary 9013 City, Town, Village Planning Board ❑Yes ❑ No City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes ❑ No City, County Health Department ❑Yes ❑ No Other Local Agencies El yes ❑ No Other Regional Agencies ❑yes ❑ No State �encies Yes No A9 NYS DEC February 2013 ❑ NYS DOS February 2013 ❑ February 2013 Federal Agencies Yes No US ACOE C. Zoning and Planning Information t. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ❑Yes ® No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑Zoning amendment ❑ Zoning variance ❑New/revision of master plan ❑ Subdivision ❑ Site pin ❑Special use permit ❑Resource management plan ❑ Other Page 8 of 21 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? Residential, single family, one dwelling per lot. 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Residential, single family, one dwelling per lot. E 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? LNo changes 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site If developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? No changes, proposed 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? [Ryes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s)and zoning classifications within a'A mile radius of proposed action? Adjacent land uses are residential. 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a Y4 mile? ®yes ©No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? _ Not applicable a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s)for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑ Yes ® No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services(recreation, education, police, fire protection? ❑Yes ® No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ❑Yes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes®No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. Oyes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E Verification f I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. �7�Z/ /13 Applicant/Sponsor Name Harnrinciton Family Partnershi , Mr. David Harrington Date< Signature P �" ,� Title �Q/v�C lt � \ C lQ N�rJ �R ➢�1L�Q,���t �( If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 PART 11 - IMPACT ASSESSMENT Ae completed by Lead Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.4? If yes,coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. 11 Yes ❑1 No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.6? If No,a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. E]Yes z No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING:(Answers may be handwritten,if legible) C1. Existing air quality,surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels,existing traffic pattern,solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion,drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic,agricultural,archaeological, historic,or other natural or cultural resources;or community or neighborhood character?Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna,fish,shellfish or wildlife species,significant habitats,or threatened or endangered species?Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources?Explain briefly: C5. Growth,subsequent development,or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action?Explain briefly: C6. Longterm,short term,cumulative,or other effects not identified in C1-05? Explain briefly: CT Other impacts(including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly: D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREA(CEA)? E] Yes z No If Yes,explain briefly: E. IS THERE,OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE,CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? Yes F No If Yes,explain briefly: PART III-DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE(To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above,determine whether it is substantial,large,important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a)setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b)probability of occurring; (c)duration; (d)irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f)magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. If question D of Part II was checked yes,the determination of significance must evaluate the potential impact of the proposed action on the environmental characteristics of the CEA. Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FUL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. Fj Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation,that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide,on attachments as necessary,the reasons supporting this determination Board of Trustees Name of Lead Agency Date President Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from responsible o Icer) Town of Southold • LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except for minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail,listing both supporting and non-suimorting facts If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department,all local libraries and the Town Clerk's Office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 1000—02— 1 - 12 PROJECT NAME: Pier Reconstruction-Harrington Family Limited Partnership The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board Planning Board Building Dept. Board of Trustees X 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): a) Action undertaken directly to Town agency (e.g. capital construction,planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant loan subsidy) c) Permit,approval, license, certification: X Nature and extent of action: Construct a 138 (+/-) LF of 5-FT wide fixed wood pile and timber pier including four batter braced tie off piles and ladders waterward of the apparent high water line Relocate 4-FT wide stairs with a new 5 FT X 4-FT fixed landing and reconstruct an existing wood access ramp landward of the apparent high water line. 1 Location of act Property off of Private 4 on Clay Point Site acreage: Parcel = 2.1 Present Land use: Residential Present Zoning Classification: Residential 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: a) Name of applicant: Harrington Family Limited Partnership C/o David Harrington b) Mailing Address: 70 Rocky Hill Road Chadds Ford PA 19317 c) Telephone number: Area Code (978) 505-9277 d) Application number, if any Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes X No_ If yes, which state or federal Agency? US ALOE. NYS DEC C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support of not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneticial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWR.P Section III —Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. X Yes _No _Not Applicable The pier reconstruction makes appropriate benificial use of an existing waterfront site and complies with environmental designfactors published b the NYS DEC and the DOS Coastal Management pro Southold Local Law No. 6 2004 and the Southold LWRP. The ier will be built to a 4-foot deck height (8 FT MLW elevation levebover the bottom sediments at the apparent high water line until passing the Marent mean high water line where the clearance will be approximately 5 feet and gradually increasing.. Rails will be 42 inches above the deck. There will be no imairment of waterflow or navigation. Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Page 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable 2 Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III–Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria — Yes —No X Not Applicable A pier has existed at this site for decades since before current Town regulation permitting programs or the LWRP. This project proposes to reconstruct the deteriorated dock facility to meet current standards consistent with safe boating and public access standards and typical climatological conditions. The pier will also be typical in construction to docks in similar coastal waters. NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III–Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria. — Yes — No X Not Applicable These pier reconstruction will take place in West Harbor and is acknowledged to be in a flood-prone area,• there is no wave exposure at this site. The pier reconstruction will be desi ed to accommodate cpm lete submersion and resist hydrostatic and h drod auric uplift ressures due to flooding. The height of the decking is specifically tailored to be above hi tide storm and waves so to to minimizert susceptibility to damage in such conditions Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III–Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria. — Yes — No X Not Applicable This proiect will not have aLiy affect on suitability of or availability of drinking water on Fishers Island. Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III – Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. X Yes — No Not Applicable 3 This project is consistent with this policy because it poses the elevation of the pier reconstruction at an acceptable height above the bottom sediments through which adjacent tidal wetlands vegetation may spread. The deck height will also allow significantly improved light passage which will be conducive to growth of eel grass in the shallow nearshore waters The dock site however is so rocky and so heavily shaded by brush, understone vegetation and trees surrounding the cove that tidal vegetation along the shoreline is minimal. No adverse impact on tidal or submerged vegetation is anticipated as a result of the proposed proiect. In addition. the NYS DEC prepared a study showing that the proposed pressure treated Southern Pine timber products construction materials are suitable for this a of project in this location, except for decking which will be of untreated woods or composite(or plastic)materials As mentioned earlier, the design arameters shown on the drawings provides an o timum balance between acceptable design and access standards without depriving the wetlands vegetation the opportunity to spread Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. — Yes — No X Not Applicable There are no air quality issues related to this project No emissions will be generated by the dock facility, Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes — No X Not Applicable There is no solid waste or hazardous substances to be enerated from this project. The ressure-treated wood trimmings from the dock construction will be collected and disposed of in accordance with current regulations so as to minimize any harmful affect PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable 4 _suis oruiect is Deme punt emanating trom private land with adequate clearance for passage alone the beach beneath the framin . blic trust lands and waters constitut area between the mean hi water line and mean low w line and the resources are from M high tide line out These environmental resources are being protected by the design standards dictated by the NYS DEC and the Town There is virtually no public use of the waterfront in this area and the reconstruction of the pier and landward extension above the Marent high water line are not likely to influence or change this fact WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. X Yes No Not Applicable This project is to reconstruct a nier for water-d endent recreational and trans ortation boating. This usage is defined as water-dependent in the LWRP because the pier reconstruction will be for recreational boating and provide boat transportation access to the mainland The pier to shore is to provide access while protecting existing habitat Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable This pier is not used for commercial fishing or shellfish industries or enterprises Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable This pier is not used for or in support of any agricultural or Nuaculture industries or ent rises. Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral sources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Yes No X Not Applicable This pier is not used for or in g=ort of any energy or mineral mining or processing operations PREPARED BY Keith B. Neilson_ P.E. Docko Inc TITLE Agent DATE February 2013 5 Docko, Inc. Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O.Box 421,Mystic,7860' 572-8939 Fax:(860)572-7569,email:permits@docko.com pril 29, 2013 Ms. James King, President Southold Board of Trustees MAY 1 2013 P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 SGWhold mm B ;r. . Re: Harrington arm y Limited Partnership Pier Reconstruction West Harbor, Fishers Island Dear Mr. King: On behalf of the Harrington Family Limited Partnership, we enclose herewith the following in support of his permit application for pier reconstruction in West Harbor on Fishers Island. ➢ Three prints each of plans titled: Project: "Pier Reconstruction" Waterway: Fishers Island Location: Fishers Island, Town of Southold Suffolk County,New York Applicant: Harrington Family Limited Partnership Date: November 26, 2012 ➢ Three copies of the Southold Board of Trustees permit application, SEQR- Part 1, LWRP Consistency Assessment Form, Tax Assessor's Map, site photographs and location map and topographic and boundary survey of the site. ➢ Two checks in the amount of$250.00 each payable to the Town of Southold. ➢ One copy of each of the other applications to regulatory agencies. I trust that you will find this application package complete and acceptable; please let me know if the need for further information arises. Very truly yours, D(OC�KO, INC. Keith B.Neilson,lV ��� KBN:cb Enclosures CC: David Harrington US ACOE NYS DEC: Environmental Permits NYS DOS File: 12-07-2422 CAMPBELL II SURVEY by GME ENGINEERING, N BOARD OF TRUSiiE5,ND Su EYNO s.ARGHrmcruRE,PLLc F ISH>=R TOWN OF SOUTH(.D 1��- L.�.IVD SITE r�OLJIVL7 DATE ✓Y/- 30 �l3 m PROPERTY of o HARRINGTON APPARENT HK�H WATER 3,33 MEAN HIGH 1 I s 1p UNE(MHWj EL= 2S / APPARENT LOW WATER 11 0 UNE(ALWL)EL=0. 1 / I I APPROXIMATE TDA OF WETL I a EXISTING PILE TO BE REMOVED(TYP) 1� 1 WETLANDS NEW BATTER BRACED ROCKY BEACH(1YP) L TIE-OFFF PRILE(71'P) e � � i �f o TOP OF BANK 14.%Fr BOUL.DER(TYP) I I I o NEW LADDER(lYP) � N�DEx I I I I NEW PILE SUPPORTED PER I END DECK EL I ICLFgq I / EL=15.43 II. 4p'R(nc)�� INEW SUPPORT PILE(TYP) NEW 5-FT X 4-FT PLATFORM with RAILS I NEW OPEN GRATE DECK NG(TYP) I I I OOD RAMP 30 BOULDER REL/OCATED STAIRS� I TO BE REBUILT TED l d -t ✓ 1 with NEW OPEN LOCATED 10-1 2012 � � � fl �,t� 3 I I GRATE DECK I I I J➢'"r�Y BOULDER(TYP) I 5 ARTINA ALTERNIFLO% G @ V^ OF BANK I o , I I NOTES. D p 0 IG OM - T 1)DECKING-TO BE-THRU-FLOW GRATE DECK �/ LS l I 2)ALL PILES TO BE 12-IN GLASS-B JUL 2 4 2013Y `" r `* N/F PROPERTY OF PL �.IV �/I EW sPARn Al- FLORA y* ' ` JABOO LIMITED: I fY v.}y GRAPHIC SCA-E 1 _3o Southold Town f,.,, ,, �= PARTNERSHIP 30 20 10 0 30 PROJECT; PIER REGONSTRUG770N % REVISED 4-4-13 NY DEG LOGATION: FISHERS ISLAND- TOWN of SOUTH= TOP of BANK CALLOUT SUFFOLK COUNTY,NEW YORK WATERWAY. FISHERS ISLAND SOUND �Q. ON KEIT REVISED 4-17-13 T.O.S. DATE NOVEMBER 26,2012 9 0 C K O PIER LENGTH APPLICANT: DAVID HARRINGTON REVISED 6-20-13 T.O.S. 1 w OPEN GRATE DECKING AGENT: SHEET 3 OF 4 REVISED 7-T7-13 T.O.5. DOGIGO, INC. 08692-" P OPEN GRATE DECKING Keith B.Nellson,PE OA90F 8692•NPV��` 8 572 8939Mystic.CT 55FX 860 572 7569 R P 0 R E$$lQ EMAIL permits@do ko.c DWG 12 07-2422 �.I F B.Neilson,pocko x. 7/18/2013113 PM Harr ngtonCamObe�Ddwg