The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTR-8215 James F. King, President O~g~fFO(~co Town Hall, S309S Main Rd. Bob Ghosio, Jr., Vice-President rly~ P.O. Box 1179 a Dave Bergen ~ Southold, N1' 11971 W John Bredemeyer °y Telephone (631) 765-1892 Michael J. Domino '~Ol ~ Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK, TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR APRE-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND POSSIBLE REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. INSPECTION SCHEDULE Pre-construction, hay bale line 15f day of construction '/z constructed V Project complete, compliance inspection I I BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK PERMIT N0.8215 DATE: JUNE 19, 2013 ISSUED TO: RALPH CARBONE ~ I PROPERTY ADDRESS: EAST END ROAD, FISHERS ISLAND SCTM# 1-2-5 I i AUTHORIZATION Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the meeting held on June 19.2013, and in consideration of application fee in the sum of $250.00 paid by Glenn E. Just and subject to the Terms and Conditions as stated in the Resolution, the Southold Town Board of Trustees authorizes and permits the following: Wetland Permit to remove t15' of existing dwelling, cantilevered porches attached to dwelling, covered deck facing northeast, and front porch; construct a new 8.6'x21.6' front porch; a 6'x20' side entry porch; construct a stair tower; construct a screened porch on easterly side of dwelling; construct wrap-around open decks with stairs; construct a 13.6'x17' deck over roof of great room; construct a dormer on northeast side; and construct an outdoor shower; with the condition of the installation of gutters to leaders to drywells and in accordance with Chapter 236 of the Town Code- Stormwater Management; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by CME Associates Engineering, Land Surveying & Architecture, PLLC, last dated March 7, 2013 and stamped approved on June 19, 2013. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date. ~~o~g~FOl,r~o ~ ~ o yyol # ~ao~ TERMS AND CONDITIONS The Permittee, Ralph Carbone residine at East End Road Fishers Island, New York as part of the consideration for the issuance of the Permit does understand and prescribe to the following: l . That the said Board of Trustees and the Town of Southold are released from any and all damages, or claims for damages, of suits arising directly or indirectly as a result of any operation performed pursuant to this permit, and the said Permittee will, at his or her own expense, defend any and all such suits initiated by third parties, and the said Permittee assumes full liability with respect thereto, to the complete exclusion of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold. 2. That this Permit is valid for a period of 24 months, which is considered to be the estimated time required to complete the work involved, but should circumstances warrant, request for an extension may be made to the Board at a later date. 3. That this Permit should be retained indefinitely, or as Tong as the said Permittee wishes to maintain the structure or project involved, to provide evidence to anyone concerned that authorization was originally obtained. 4. That the work involved will be subject to the inspection and approval of the Board or its agents, and non-compliance with the provisions of the originating application may be cause for revocation of this Permit by resolution of the said Board. 5. That there will be no unreasonable interference with navigation as a result of the work herein authorized. 6. That there shall be no interference with the right of the public to pass and repass along the beach between high and low water marks. 7. That if future operations of the Town of Southold require the removal and/or alterations in the location of the work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Board of Trustees, the work shall. cause unreasonable obstruction to free navigation, the said Permittee will be required, upon due notice, to remove or alter this work project herein stated without expenses to the Town of Southold. 8. That the said Board will be notified by the Permittee of the completion of the work authorized. 9. That the Permittee will obtain all other permits and consents that may be required supplemental to this permit, which may be subject to revoke upon failure to obtain same. James F. King, President ~QF SQUry Town Hall Annex Ol0 54375 Main Road Bob Ghosio, Jr., Vice-President P.O. Box 1179 Dave Bergen l~{ ~ Southold, New York 11971-0959 John Bredemeyer G Q Michael J. Domino ~ 0 Telephone (631) 765.1892 ~Ol~CO Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 19, 2013 Mr. Glenn E. Just J.M.O. Environmental Consulting PO Box 447 Quogue, NY 11959-0447 RE: RALPH CARBONE EAST END ROAD, FISHERS ISLAND SCTM# 1-2-5 Dear Mr. Just: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wednesday, June 19, 2013 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, J.M.O. Environmental Consulting on behalf of RALPH CARBONE applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated April 26, 2013, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, the LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation that the application be found Consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program policy standards, and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on June 19, 2013, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, z . • WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees have found the application to be Consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, and, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approve the application of RALPH CARBONE to remove t15' of existing dwelling, cantilevered porches attached to dwelling, covered deck facing northeast, and front porch; construct a new 8.6'x21.6' front porch; a 6'x20' side entry porch; construct a stair tower; construct a screened porch on easterly side of dwelling; construct wrap-around open decks with stairs; construct a 13.6'x17' deck over roof of great room; construct a dormer on northeast side; and construct an outdoor shower; with the condition of the installation of gutters to leaders to drywells and in accordance with Chapter 236 of the Town Code-Stomtwater Management; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by CME Associates Engineering, Land Surveying & Architecture, PLLC, last dated March 7, 2013 and stamped approved on June 19, 2013. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date the permit is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Inspections are required at a fee of $50.00 per inspection. (See attached schedule.) Fees: $50.00 Ve truly yours, o'er James F. King President, Board of Trustees JFK/amn asuFFOC~-~P~ James F. King, President y ~ Town Hall Annex Bob Ghosio, Jc, Vice-President w 54375 Route 25, P.O. Bax L 179 Davc Bergea ~y~ Q`~ Southold, AIY i 1971 John Bredemeyer dj ~ ~ Telephone (67l) 765-1892 Michael J. Domino Fax (63l) 765-6641 BOARD OF TO WN TRUSTEES r ~ TOWN OFSOUTHOLD To: ~M • D. C11U1mf~11i)P ~ ~ fl CU -fir 12a(bh ~'a?-bones Please be advised that your application dated 2 has been reviewed by this Board at the regular meeting of .and your application has been approved peh~ng the completion of he following items checked off below. Revised Plans for proposed project Pre-Construction Hay Bale Line Inspection Fee ($50.00) 15~ Oay of Construction ($50.00) %Z Constructed ($50.00) Final Inspection Fee ($50.00). Dock Fees ($3.00 per sq. ft.) Permit fees are now due. Please make check or money order payable to Town of SotJxhold. The fee is computed. below according to the schedule of rates as set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code. The following fee must be paid within 90 days or re-application fees will be necessary. You will receive your permit upon completion of the above. COMPUTATION OF PERMIT FEES: t 7/1°/13i TOTAL FEES OUE: $ ~O~ ~`~~(p93} BY: James F. King, President Board of Trustees • James F. King, President ESQ Town Hall Mnex Bob Ghosio, Jr., Vice-President ~~0 VTyO 54375 Main Road ~O l~ P.O. Box 1179 Dave Bergen y # Southold, New York 11971-0959 John Bredemeyer sn Q Telephone (631) 765-1892 Michael J. Domino ~ ~ ~ Fax (631) 765-6641 ~~'~OOUNiV BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Leslie K. Weisman, Chairperson Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: James F. King, President Board of Trustees DATE: July 10, 2013 RE: ZBA #6664 -Carbone, Ralph SCTM# 1-2-5 The Board of Trustees reviewed your memo regarding the above mentioned application. On January 18, 2013 an application for this property was submitted to the Board of Trustees who formally approved Wetland Permit #8043 and Coastal Erosion Permit #8043C on February 20, 2013 to restore the storm eroded bluff. Copies of these permits are attached for your reference to the specifics of the approved project description. On April 26, 2013 an application for this property was submitted to the Soard of Trustees who formally approved Wetland Permit #8215 on June 19, 2013 for modifications to the existing dwelling, with the condition of the installation of gutters to leaders to drywells on the dwelling. A copy of this permit is also attached for your reference to the specifics of the approved project description. If you require any additional information, both files are available in the office for review. Attachments BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK PERMIT NU. 8043 DATE: FEBRUARY 20.2013 I ISSUED TO: RALPH CARBONE PROPERTY ADDRESS: 6227 CASTLE ROAD. FISHERS ISLAND SCTM# 1-2-5 ' I AU"CHORIGATION Pursuant to the proviso+ns :d'~haptcr ?7$ andior Chapter I t t of the Town Code of the Town of Southold and in a,:cnriancc with the Resolution of the board of Trustees adopted at the tneeling held on hcbnun}• 20~_tl l nd in a,ns +crxion ol'application fee in the sum of~500.00 paid by Glenn E. Just or ~ authorized waiver of'I own }bard and subject to the Terms and Conditions as stated in the Resolution, the ~ Southold "town Hoard c( Trustees awhorizes and permits the following: W'ctlattd Permit to remove approximately 335' of concrete seawall and approximately 311' ofex;}used I:MU wall damaged by Hurricane Sandy; install on filter fabric, crushcJ stuuc and compacted granular fill approximately 400' of rip-rsp revetment; a portion of the bunk ill be excavated, several layers of compacted 9" thick j lifts of granular fill will be installed and galvanized wire forms with filter fabric will be i ' installed; the forms will then be filled with plantable soils and then planted forming a reinforced vegetated sMpe; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by Ocean and Coastal Consultants, last dated January 10, 2013, sod stamped approved on February ; 20, 21113. IN WITNESS WIiEREOF, the said Board of'1'rwtees hereby causes iW Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these pnsen!s to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date. I ,qj ~~QgpFFO(,~co _ _ -_-a - - o ~ ~ ' ~ 'r"~, - z - n.: W' ~ ,,.:a.1-~~4nln. ~ .w. .~w...µ..... - K'. 4`1n M4Y YxJ y:LLn.:! ' a - . Ii James F. King, President ~~OF ~UJyO Town Hell Annex Bob Ghosio, Jr., Vice-President 6 5437b Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Dave Bergen ~ ~ Southold, New York 11971-0959 John Bredemeyer Michael J. Domino Telephone (881) 78b-1892 ~ Fax (631) 766-6841 , BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF 30UTHOLD COASTAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PERMIT COASTAL EROSION PERMIT #8043C Applicant/Agent: J.M.O. Environmental Consulting Services Permlttee: Ralph Carbone SCTM#: 1-2-5 Project Location: 6227 Castle Road, Fishers Island Date of Resolutionllssuance: February 20, 2013 Date of Expiration: February 20, 2015 Reviewed by: James F. King, President DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY: To remove approximately 335' of con(xete seawall and approximately 30' of exposed CMU wall damaged by Hurricane Sandy; install on finer fabric, crushed stone and compacted granular fill approximately 400' of rip-rap revetment; a portion of the bank will be excavated, several layers of compacted 9" thick lifts of granular fill will be installed and galvanized wire forms with finer fabric will be installed; the forms will then be filled with plantable soils and then planted forming a reinforced vegetated sbpe; and as depicted on the site plan prepared by Ocean and Coastal Consultants, last dated January 10, 2013, and stamped approved on February 20, 2013. INSPECTIONS: Final Inspection SPECIAL CONDITIONS: (apply if marked) In accordance with Chapter 111-15 Erosion Protection St?uctures: XX A maintenance agreement is attached hereto and is a necessary special condition of this permit. BY: James F. King, President Board of Trustees a~ . BOARD OF 30UTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK t PERMIT NO. 3215 DATE: JUNE 19, 2013 ISSUED TO: RALPH CAR>l:&?NE PROPERTY ADDRESS: EAST END ROAD, FISIIERS ISLAND SCTM# 1-2-5 AUTHORIZATION Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the meeting held on June 19.2013, and in consideration of application fee in the sum of $250.00 paid by Glenn E. Just and subject to the Tetms and Conditions as stated in the Resolution, the Southold Town Bawd of Trustees authorizes and pemtits the following: Wetland Permit to remove f15' of existing dwelling, cantilevered porches attached to dwelling, covered deck facing northeast, and front porch; consttruct a new 8.6'x21.6' front porch; a 6'x20' side entry porch; construct a stair tower; construct a screened porch on easterly. side of dwelling;. copstructwrsp-around open decks with stairs; construct a 13.6'x17 deck over roof of ,great room; construct a dorgler on northeast side; and construct an outdoor shower; with the condition of the installation of gutters todeaders to drywells aad in accordaace with Chapter Z36 of the Town Code- Stormwater Management; and as tlepided on the site pktn prepared Ely CME Associates Engineering, Iw~d Surveying & Architecture, PLLC, last dated March 7, 2013 aad' stamfped approved ori`Jitnie 19; 20)13. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date: t. ~ ~kyQl ~ ,~ao~ BOARD MEMBERS ~ • Southold Town Hall q~~QF $UUjy~! 53095 Main Road • P.O. Box 1179 Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson ~ O Southold,NY11971-0959 Eric Dantes ~ # Office Location: Gerard P. Goehringer Q Town Annex /First Floor, Capital One Sank George Horning ~0 ~ i~ 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Ken Schneider ~~CO(f~ Southold, NY 11971 http: //sou[hol down. northfork. net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 • Fax (631) 765-9064 n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r. MEMO - 2 2013 ' ~ T0. Trustees Southold sown r f T• FROM: Leslie K. Weisman, ZBA Chairperson. DATE: July 2, 2013 SUBJECT: Request for Comments ZBA # 6664 CARBONE, Ralph 1000-1.2-5 The ZBA is reviewing the following application. Enclosed are copies of the Building Department's Notice of Disapproval, copy of survey with proposal and a copy of the Soil & Water Report. Your review and comments are requested at this time. NAME TAX # ZBA # Code Variance Date of PREPARER ZONE DIST Section Stamped OF SURVEY Surve CARBONE, Ralph 1000-1-2-5 6664 280-116 Bluff Setback Survey co Your comments are requested ASAP. Qur hearing is scheduled for July 11, 2013. If desired, the file is available for review of additional documentation. Thank you. Encls. FORM NO. 3 RECEI11Ef~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ~ '''-nj3 BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. BOARD ~OjF (APPEALS NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL _ 013 'I'O: Ralph Car one 635 Tudor Drive JUL - 2 2p13 Cheshire, CT 06410 Please take notice that your application dated March 22, 2013 6 ao~thold town r ~ For a permit for construction of additions and alterations to an sin¢le family dwelling at Location of property East End Road, Fisher's Island County Tax Map No. 1000 -Section 1 Block 2 Lot 5 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article XXII Section 280-116 which states; "All buildings located on lots adjacent to sounds and upon which there exists a bluff or bank landward of the shore or beach shall be set back not fewer than one hundred (100) feet from the top of such bluff or bank." Following the g~osed construction, the dwelling_will be setback f/- 13 feet from theme of bluff. In addition, the proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article III, Section 280-14, which states, "No bullding or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the A-C R-80 R-120 R-200 and R-400 Districts unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking Schedule." Bulk schedule ?imits structures to 2 '/z stories and 35 feet iu height. Followine the proposed construction notes a 3-story dwelling with a height of 39 from average existing rg ade. Thu Notice o Dug royal was amended on Ma l3 2013 to address h ' restricn s n bet o stories. r i na e Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A. ~ r~ SUFFOLK OOUPiIYSWCD Paul A. TeNym6uis, CSC 4E8 GRII+FING AVFNIJE p1ypM Maoa~r 9UIlE 110 RIVFRfiEAD, IVY 11901 Phooc (681)747-8815 x8 ~ Ccage livioe. Cbavman FAX (681)747-8160 (516) 607-1566 June 19, 2013 ~ ~ 2 8 19 ~ Leslie K. Weisman ~ REC~I~ Chairperson , ~ CC Board of Appeals ~ ~ 2 2013 SUN 2 y 2013 Town of Southold $ P. O. Box 1179 ~ ~qR~ OF s~~.~n:o~~~ ra~,n APp Southold, New York 11971-0959 Boar' i Tn t~s FADS Re: ZBA#6664 Carbone, Ralph Dear Chairperson Weisman, A site visit was conducted at 6227 East End Road, Fishers Island, (Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-1-2-5) on June 18, 2013. The following are the observations and recommendations reflective of this site investigation. Observations: The property is sited on the southeastern end of Fishers Island on a 35-foot high bluff which sustained extensive shoreline damage due to direct impact from Hurricane Sandy. To stabilize the bluff and protect the integrity of the structures atop the bluff, a rock rip-rap wall is being constructed along the entire length of the shoreline (as permitted). Contractors on-site of the day of the site visit, explained that rock wall will continue to constructed vertically and tie into the remaining vegetated upper bluff from just west of the house and to the lower eastern shoreline. First Level of Rock Wall Construction Ollicc Hours: Monday lhmuxh "llmrsd-ay 7:;t0 a.m. to 4:(N) p.m. Fri<tay 7B0 a.m. (I~rough 3aN) p.m. Eastern Section of the Shoreline and Access Road N - Construction access point m 3 . • n4 Top of the eastern bluff and sloped lawn Constructed shoreline access road u ~ a { r,,j ' ~ e , R ~ 1111. lip{i From the house to the east, the bluff gradually reduces in elevation. The lower half of the bluff was heavily scoured and remains devoid of vegetation. The area atop of the bluff is managed as a well-turfed lawn with moderate slopes of 8 -15%. The east side of the property, a well turfed lawn slopes both towards the south, south-east, and east. The southeastern section has the longest length of turf extending down to the neighboring yard. The slope to the south transitions from turf grass to grasses and low shrubs. The northern section is vegetated with trees and a large swath of lilies. The porches attached to the house range from at grade to 10 feet above grade. Due to the deep shade, no vegetation exists under these porches. Sheet erosion is occurring on the exposed slopes with fines deposition occurring under the "proposed screen deck". The porch is edged with mature Hydrangeas. The lawn, lilies and Hydrangeas are all serviced by sprinkler irrigation. On the neighboring property, the bluff reduces to a level elevation at approximately five feet above sea level providing heavy equipment access to the shoreline. The construction road traverses the lawn and the weight and treading of the machinery has resulted in exposed soils, compaction and erosion. No measures have been implemented to reduce erosion at this access point, which outfalls to the beach. Similarly, a mound of soil adjacent to the construction road is not stabilized and contains Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica), a very aggressive invasive species which has demonstrated abilities to thrive and spread on bluff sites. Eastern Section of the Shoreline and Access Road vim, Construction access point 0 [a. Top of the eastern bluff andsloped lawn Constrtcte~d sloreline'access road ssx ~j ~ NsC4 From the house to the east, the bluff gradually reduces in elevation. The lower half of the bluff was heavily scoured and remains devoid of vegetation. The area atop of the bluff is managed as a well-turfed lawn with moderate slopes of 8 -15%. The east side of the property, a well turfed lawn slopes both towards the south, south-east, and east. The southeastern section has the longest length of turf extending down to the neighboring yard. The slope to the south transitions from turf grass to grasses and low shrubs. The northern section is vegetated with trees and a large swath of lilies. The porches attached to the house range. from at grade to 10 feet above grade. Due to the deep shade, no vegetation exists under these porches. Sheet erosion is occurring on the exposed slopes with fines deposition occurring under the "proposed screen deck". The porch is edged with mature Hydrangeas. The lawn, lilies and Hydrangeas are all serviced by sprinkler irrigation. On the neighboring property, the bluff reduces to a level elevation at approximately five feet above sea level providing heavy equipment access to the shoreline. Tfie construction road traverses the lawn and the weight and treading of the machinery has resulted in exposed soils, compaction and erosion. No measures have been implemented to reduce erosion at this access point, which outfalls to the beach. Similarly, a mound of soil adjacent to the construction road is not stabilized and contains Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonicoy, a very aggressive invasive species which has demonstrated abilities to thrive and spread on bluff sites. ? • 41 `1 'W, _ it " OY~. ~b ~ ~ .L,~. n 1 Construction access way (Northam /cspect) Japanese Nnotweed Middle Section of the Bluff -House: 4t a ~ .F ..i,~~~ 'i? ..¢,i, -F mac. t a s...=s - t . .a , :art t;y, . , ~?~r 4\J ~~~n , Immediately to the west and along the front of the house to the east, only the upper section of the bluff remains intact and is vegetated with a diverse array of native and non-native grasses, shrubs, and vines including Rosa rugosa, Bayberry (Morelia pennsylvancio), Porcelain berry (Ampelopsis brevipedunculata),and Wild grape (Vitis spp.). The lower bluff face is in the process of being stabilized with the installation of a rock rip-rap wall. Eastern side of the south section of the house t. sV~ The southern section of the house is sited immediately atop and over the vegetated bluff. The top of the bluff is defined as where the grade of the yard slopes towards the shoreline identified by yellow line). A cantilevered porch further suspends out and aver the bluff from the southern side of the house. The section proposed for removal is the deck and section of the house between the deck and existing foundation (which is framed with lath and is highlighted by the yellow box below. A deck is proposed in place of the section of house slated for demolition. It was not clear if the existing concrete foundation or part of it will be removed to facilitate the demolition of the southernmost section of the house. The footprint of the deck would extend to the original southern portion of the house but to the extent of the cantilevered deck. An outdoor shower is proposed in the Southwestern corner of the main part of the house. Western side of southern section of house Proposed for Removal - Foundation Ends Eastern side of the south section of the house !1 * ~~j ..a The southern section of the house is sited immediately atop and over the vegetated bluff. The top of the. bluff is defined as where the grade of the yard slopes towards the shoreline identified by yellow line). A cantilevered porch further suspends out and over the bluff from the southern side of the house. The section proposed for removal is the deck and section of the house between the deck and existing foundation (which is framed with lath and is highlighted by the yelow box below. A deck is proposed in place of the section of house stated for demolition. It was not clear if the existing concrete foundation or part of it will be removed to facilitate the demolition ofthe'southernmost section of the house. The footprint of the deck would extend to the original southern portion of the house but to the extent of the cantilevered deck. An outdoor shower is proposed in the Southwestern corner of the main part of the house. Western side of southern section of house Proposed for Removal Foundation Ends ::J fp Sprinkler Head Bluff vegetation surrounds the base of this foundation, preventing access to southern aspect of the bluff. Silt fencing is proposed approximately 10 feet down on the 36 foot contour of the vegetated bluff face during the construction activities. A row of Rugosa rose is maintained on the transition areas between the yard and natural area. The well vegetated yard is mowed and maintained by a sprinkler irrigation system that runs along the top edge of the bluff. The lawn gently slopes to the bluff, and more steeply at the last three feet of lawn seaward. Remainine Bluff Stairway Immediately to the east of the house, a flagstone stairway travels down the remaining face of the intact upper bluff and is landscaped with an array of non-native plant species. However, access is no longer possible as the stairway no longer exists on the lower section of the eroded bluff. Erosion of the Western Shoreline West North ~P Clav lens 1a` ~ i Exposed retainine wall Filter fabric I ~ ° t,' v. The western shoreline also experienced high rates of bluff erosion and damage with a minimum of 15 feet being lost from the top of the bluff (as per blueprint drawing). A clay lens, which serves as an impermeable layer to percolating ground water runs laterally across the bluff face. The erosion exposed water pipes and a concrete retaining wall that supports the in-ground pool. At top of the bluff, the southeast corner of the pool and concrete stairs leading to the pool is now within five feet of the top of the bluff. I'~~: , , , . Vii ~F ~ ~ i Concrete steps, exposed pipes and overhanging lips of vegetation Exposed concrete retaining wall and pool (Southeastern view from pool) (Western view from stairs) To the west, the southeast corner of the pool is within six feet of the vertical bluff face. The exposed retaining wall on the bluff face cannot be observed from this angle. The pool is sited in a depression to the west of the house. The slopes are landscaped with traditional horticulture species such as Iris', Black Pine, Hydrangeas with the flats around the Erosion of the Western Shoreline ~r: West r' North Clav lens F rt " Exposed retainine wall Filter fabric The western shoreline also experienced high rates of bluff erosion and damage with a minimum of 15 feet being lost from the top of the bluff (as per blueprint drawing). A clay lens, which serves as an impermeable layer to percolating ground water runs laterally across the bluff face. The erosion exposed water pipes and a concrete retaining wall that supports the in-ground pool. At top of the bluff, the southeast corner of the pool and concrete stairs leading to the pool is now within five feet of the top of the bluff. ~ _ Concrete steps, exposed pipes and overhanging lips of vegetation Exposed concrete retaining wall and pool (Southeastern view from pool) (Western view from stairs) To the west, the southeast corner of the pool is within six feet of the vertical bluff face. The exposed retaining wall on the bluff face cannot be observed from this angle. The pool is sited in a depression to the west of the house. The slopes are landscaped with traditional horticulture species such as Iris', Black Pine, Hydrangeas with the flats around the i pool being turfed. A pool drain was not apparent however, due to the instability of this area, a complete investigation around the pool was not conducted. The front of the house slopes towards the north, with the paved drive serving as a conduit to runoff. The paved driveway is cracked and in disrepair. Limited landscaping plants exist in the front of the house which is currently being used as a deposition area for debris and heating ducts removed from the house's interior. A rose and herb garden which seemingly is abandoned, and a grouping of trees exist to the west, would need to be removed to facilitate the construction of the extra parking lot. The entire house is fitted with gutters, down spouts, and dry wells, with the exception of the front gutter damaged by the hurricane. Demolition of the inside of the house has commenced under a Town Permit. Recommendations: The first concerns with the site and proposed construction are the bluff instability and the critical need to achieve slope stabilization. Currently, the bluff remains unstable and susceptible to erosion having an undercut upper bluff face, vertical faces, overhanging lips of vegetation, trees atop of the bluff, and exposed pool retaining wall. To help abate future erosion and bluff failures, the rock wall construction has and should continue as permitted on the mid and eastern section of the bluff, to an elevation equivalent to the intact upper bluff face and revegetated with an array of native grasses and shrubs. This will reinforce the toe of the shoreline and support the perched upper bluff face, preventing it from sloughing. Stabilization of the western bluff and pool requires back filling with soil behind the rock, as it is constructed up the bluff face. Revegetation of the bluff face should also occur at this section of the shoreline. As part of this installation, any trees atop the bluff should be cut to ground level, leaving their roots intact. This will prevent trees from toppling down the bluff in the face of strong winds, which can catalyze erosion both from soil exposure and impact damage. These are very costly and complex shoreline stabilization activities that are critically necessary to help abate future erosion and bluff failure and protect the house and pool. Although the construction of the rock wall is currently advancing, it is a slow process, and effective shoreline stabilization will not be recognized until the completion of the wall and establishment of vegetation. In the meantime, both the proposed construction and current landscaping management activities have the potential to further advance bluff erosion and compromise the shoreline stabilization infrastructure during and after construction. The following measures are encouraged to help ensure that these activities are advanced in a sensitive and methodical manner to reduce the potential of unintentional impacts. First, to prevent further erosion and damage to the yard, protective matting should be placed on the access road. The soil stock pile should be disposed of in a dumpster, to prevent contamination and spread of Japanese knotweed. This species can spread both by seed and Y: inch rhizomes. As excavations of the eastern shoreline are commenced, digging and removing the small population of Japanese knotweed is encouraged. In concert, access to the top of the bluff, the pool, stairway, and edges of the bluff, should be prevented as much possible until shoreline repairs are completed. This is very important as the top of the bluff especially in the pool area, is undercut and may not have the structural integrity for weight bearing, resulting in bluff collapse and harm to human health or equipment. Similarly, the siting of dumpsters and equipment (backhoes, concrete trucks, vehicles, etc.) in close proximity to the bluff is not recommended. Even with shoreline stabilization, adding additional weight can cause collapse. Therefore, heavy equipment and dumpsters should not be sited or staged in close proximity of the bluff or on the western or eastern lawn areas. Rather all construction debris should be removed by hand or wheelbarrows/wagons to the front of the house. 1 The proposed demolition and reconstruction of the southern portion of the house has the potential to damage the stable vegetated section of the undercut bluff. Our office identifies that southern section of house (to be demolished) is sited on the top of the undercut bluff, rather than back from the bluff (as noted in the blue prints). It was not clearly identified in the blueprints, if the existing foundation will be removed in part, entirely, or at all. As recommended above, the excavation and demolition of the entire or part of the foundation will move the house landward but the heavy equipment, materials and construction methods applied have the potential to expose and compact soils, and damage vegetation; all factors that increase the potential for erosion. Consideration should be given to preserving the existing foundation and southern footers (granted they are in structural condition), and reconstructing the house and porch on these structural supports. This intentional practice will reduce the degree of excavation and soil exposure. Furthermore, this will help protect the existing vegetative cover of the lawn and bluff, both of which are integral in stabilizing the bluff. The roots form a matrix within the soil providing structure to the sandy and stony soils above while the ground vegetation buffers against wind erosion and reduces velocity of runoff, encouraging infiltration. However, vegetation on the bluff is not resilient to treading and is easily damaged by foot traffic and equipment. The southern section is sited on the top and over the bluff and surrounded by critical vegetation. Access to this area to facilitate construction or demolition, should be staged carefully to limit treading and disturbance to the vegetation as treading will damage and possibly kill the vegetation. No materials (such as the deck) should be dropped onto the ground or over the bluff which would cause soil exposure and/or crush the vegetation. Similarly the silt fencing, proposed approximately ten feet in front the cantilevered deck (and 20 feet down the bluff face) will require digging of a trench laterally along the contour of the bluff face and the removal of vegetation to install the silt fence properly. Further vegetation will be damaged in accessing the bluff face to facilitate the installation. Both of these activities especially the silt fencing installation exposes the bluff soils and removes vegetation, serving as a catalyst for erosion. All efforts should be made to maintain dense vegetative cover on the bluff and prevent soil exposure, therefore the installation of silt fencing on the bluff is ill-advised. Rather it should be installed in the lawn area, if significant soils disturbance is to occur. Additional decks are proposed around the entire house. On the western section of the house this will decrease the amount of vegetated lawn area atop of the bluff. Due to the close elevation to the ground, vegetation will not easily be able to be established due to shading of the porch. However, in areas such as the eastern and southern section of the property, the decks are elevated. Removal of the lath is encouraged to permit light penetration and establishment of vegetation on these slopes. Additionally, using lower growing plants in place of the Hydrangeas will increase light penetration under the decks, encourage vegetation, and help reduce erosion on the slopes. Native plants are encouraged for all landscaping activities, and should be selected for salt and drought tolerances. Selecting plants for such specific environmental and cultural conditions helps ensure their persistence in the landscape without supplemental water (irrigation) and care (nutrients) while providing important sediment and erosion control. The areas under the stairway should be vegetated with shade tolerant natives. The buffer of vegetation towards the top of the bluff should be replaced from the sloping turfed section to being established as a buffer of native plants. This will help slow water velocities, encouraging infiltration of runoff before it crests the top of the bluff. Additionally, the use of native plants will eliminate the need for sprinklers atop the bluff, a critical measure as sprinklers are a point source for erosion by discharging water onto the bluff face. Adjusting mower heights to allow for mowing at six inches rather than down to four inches or less, will help slow the water velocities on the sloping lawn and further encourage infiltration, improve lawn health, and reduce the need for supplemental irrigation. A timer should be installed on all sprinklers to ensure irrigation only occurs as needed and not during or immediately after rain events when the ground is already saturated and prone to runoff. Generally, turf grasses' consumptive use is just over one inch of water per week. Another cost effective measure to reduce runoff is to ensure that all roofs are fitted with gutters, downspouts and dry wells allowing runoff water to be discharged directly into the ground. Similarly, the pool and outdoor shower should also be fitted with dry wells to facilitate draining of the pool and disposal of the shower water, respectively. Discharging a high volume of water onto the ground, in this location will surely cause erosive and costly damage to the bluff face. 0 The proposed demolition and reconstruction of the southern portion of the house has the potential to damage the stable vegetated section of the undercut bluff. Our office identifies that southern section of house (to be demolished) is sited on the top of the undercut bluff, rather than back from the bluff (as noted in the blue prints). It was not clearly identified in the blueprints, if the existing foundation will be removed in part, entirely, or at all. As recommended above, the excavation and demolition of the entire or part of the foundation will move the house landward but the heavy equipment, materials and construction methods applied have the potential to expose and compact soils, and damage vegetation; all factors that increase the potential for erosion. Consideration should be given to preserving the existing foundation and southern footers (granted they are in structural condition), and reconstructing the house and porch on these structural supports. This intentional practice will reduce the degree of excavatlort and soil exposure: Furthermore, this will help protect the existing vegetative cover of the lawn and bluff, both of which are intEgral in stabilizing the bluff. The roots form a matrix within the soil providing structure to the sandy and stony soils above while the ground vegetation buffers against wind erosion and reduces velocity of runoff, encouraging infiltration. However, vegetation on the bluff is not resilient to treading and is easily damaged by foot traffic and equipment. The southern section is sited on the top and over the bluff and surrounded by critical vegetation. Access to this area to facilitate construction or demolition, should be staged carefully to limit treading and disturbance to the vegetation as treading will damage and possibly kill the vegetation. No materials (such as the deck) should be dropped onto the ground or over the bluff which would cause soil exposure and/or crush the vegetation. Similarly the silt fencing, proposed approximately ten feet in front the cantilevered deck (and 20 feet down the bluff face) will require digging of a trench laterally along the contour of the bluff face and the removal of vegetation to install the silt fence properly. Further vegetation will be damaged in accessing the bluff face to facilitate the installation. Both of these activities especially the silt fencing installation exposes the bluff soils and removes vegetation, serving as a catalyst for erosion. All efforts should be made to maintain dense vegetative cover on the bluff and prevent soil exposure, therefore the installation of silt fencing on the bluff is ill-advised. Rather it should be installed in the lawn area, if significant soils disturbance is to occur. Additional decks are proposed around the entire house. On the western section of the house this will decrease the amount of vegetated lawn area atop of the bluff. Due to the close elevation to the ground, vegetation will not easily be able to be established due to shading of the porch. However, in areas such as the eastern and southern section of the property, the decks are elevated. Removal of the lath is encouraged to permit light penetration and establishment of vegetation on these slopes. Additionally, using lower growing plants in place of the Hydrangeas will increase light penetration under the decks, encourage vegetation, and help reduce erosion on the slopes. Native plants are encouraged for all landscaping activities, and should be selected for salt and drought tolerances. Selecting plants for such specific environmental and cultural conditions helps ensure their persistence in the landscape without supplemental water (irrigation) and care (nutrients) while providing important sediment and erosion control. The areas under the stairway should be vegetated with shade tolerant natives. The buffer of vegetation towards the top of the bluff should be replaced from the sloping turfed section to being established as a buffer of native plants. This will help slow water velocities, encouraging infiltration of runoff before it crests the top of the bluff. Additionally, the use of native plants will eliminate the need for sprinklers atop the bluff, a critical measure as sprinklers are a point source for erosion by discharging water onto the bluff face. Adjusting mower heights to allow for mowing at six inches rather than down to four inches or less, will help slow the water velocities on the sloping lawn and further encourage infiltration, improve lawn health, and reduce the need for supplemental irrigation. A timer should be installed on all sprinklers to ensure irrigation only occurs as needed and not during or immediately after rain events when the ground is already saturated and prone to runoff. Generally, turf grasses' consumptive use is just over one inch of water per week. Another cost effective measure to reduce runoff is to ensure that all roofs are fitted with gutters, downspouts and dry wells allowing runoff water to be discharged directly into the ground. Similarly, the pool and outdoor shower should also be fitted with dry wells to facilitate draining of the pool and disposal of the shower water, respectively. Discharging a high volume of water onto the ground, in this location will surely cause erosive and costly damage to the bluff face. The dry wells for the house, shower and the pool needs to be installed to a depth below the clay lens identified in the bluff face. If these wells are not installed below grade of this impenetrable clay layer, the water will travel laterally along the clay lenses and discharge onto the bluff face instigating erosion as water finds its level. The driveway is slated for expansion to serve as extra parking. However, it is expected this lot will not need to be utilized regularly. Permeable pavers filled with stone or grass would be a suitable option to reduce impermeable surfaces while expanding the foot print of the parking area. As demonstrated by the 2012 storm season, water and wind are catalyzing forces of erosion damaging the toe, face and top of the bluff. Sources of water can be naturally occurring (tidal action, weathering and storm events) and/or conveyed anthropogenic sources, i.e. construction activities, irrigation systems, roof runoff, sloped lawns, and pool discharges. All sources, individually and/or combined have the potential to catalyze erosion on the bluff. Therefore it is critically important to ensure these management practices are implemented to reduce the potential for erosion especially as the house and pool will be compromised by any future shoreline failures. To protect the investments in shoreline protection necessitates the inspection of the rock wall periodically as well as after storm events and conducting necessary repairs as soon as possible. Accordingly, as much native herbaceous and low growing native woody vegetation should be established on the bluff face as possible to stabilize the soils of the slope and buffer against both wind and water erosion. The vegetation should not be trimmed and walking on the bluff is not encouraged. Also, only herbaceous vegetation should be established at the top of the bluff. Lastly, no landscaping materials should be disposed of on the bluff as this serves as mulch that will smother vegetation. Provided are an array of materials to assist in revegetation, landscaping and maintaining the bluff face. Of last note, the parcel owned to the north by the same property owner has been cleared of vegetation and low vegetation is returning to the site. No information was posted as to if this removal was permitted. If you have any questions regarding these recommendations orthe site visit, please feel free to contact our office. Sinc olly L. Wei nd oil District echnician ~ `l rrr EXISTING STONE ANDS } ~ ~ ~ ~ ~j'~ CONCRETE GUTTER ~ 30 \ \ ~ ~ \ \ \ ~ N coTrncE\ \ ~ \ AREA B 0 94fI ACRES \ \ \ ~ ~ ~ \ \ \ ~ \ \ BENCHMARK MAG NAIL \ \ \ , s\ SEPTIC \ \ \ y, vv-~-v _ ELEVATION °.38.5.9 \ TREE ~ ~ ~k ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 30 DRV EWA )R 30 i ~ PROPOSED DRY WELL \ \ ~ ~ \ SAWCUi DRVEWAY 36 _ ~ ~ Exlsrwc SHED UNTTS OF CONSTRUCTION \ \ ~ ` b ~ PROPOSED NEW STONE GUTTER \ B' 8 ,f? 1 E%ISTING BURIED ,o ~ 38~ PROPANE TANK \ ~'W 1 r; ~ ~ PROPOSED COVERED ENTRY ~ ~ DRIVEWAY ` °m z A/C UNITS TO BE RELOCATED g.. ~ ~ry~~, , VI ` ''o, ~ 1 PROPOSED STONE WALK TREE d ~ ~ 6d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PROPOSED STAIR TOWER ADDITION ~ 40 ~ w~ ~ uNDSCAPE PROPOSED PAVED ORNEWAY ~ BED EXISTING DRIVEWAY AND \ 1~ 1 / ~ THE 11 ` \ \ ~ FOUNTAIN 70 BE REMOVED / -I FILL LOAM AND SEED(NP.) GARAGE ~ & VENT ES ~ ~ 8 12~ 4,L SLAB EL.=37.4 \ \ \ ~ I . • W ~ Q / ~ ~ ~ ~ S $1.5 20 ~ ~ j / ~ ~ ~ ( -V I \ ~ 2e \ 2R I BLO K 1 TREE I ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ LOT 1 C `I \ AREA = 2. #/,~CRES e~ TR / \ ~ ~ ° - ~ ~ k CHERRY OUNTAIN E ` \ ALAWN k ~ ~ / TREE e ~ ~ \~s \ / - ~ 441 ) kk I \ J l o- ~ / ~ 1 / N ~ / ~ .p ~ ~ EXISTING STEPS DECK~~ \ \ ' 1 AND PLANTERS \ \ I I 1 ~ J i ~ e' ' TO BE REMOVED ~~lJf BAKER II a cHE STONE ~ saL=as.aa / ~ / % yDENCE) ~ ~ wA AND o PAVED us 1s•' _ RESIDENCE I ~ ~ ~~/ryo IC ~ ~ PARKING ~ \ PINE / < ~ PROPOSED I 44.3 0 / / t B' li 1+ v ' ~ ~v ~ HOUSE UNE r ~ ~ vI PIN ~Q ~ ~i a W GARDEN ; \ ~ SILL=45.89 V~ M~ / ~ III ~ ~ I j i i 00 ~ i S I~ 12°~ O '=PIN. / _ rr_~ia AFC I I. 3•'Sk PINE ~ u PINE r~ly ~:P~LE ,p;NE PIN~ . ~ v_v _ ~ \i I STONE p'E' 9 \vy~ A`p4~i a OU PL STONE ,~PINE~ PATIO / 04'i / ~~/J ~ . ce k~ MENT PATIO ' ~4? il~ ~ LAWN '1 i~ EROSION GARDEN P'N~ ~ -r~ ~ / ARD UNE ap I/' 16•• f ~ a° ''~I_I o~ / / PELEV. CE No.2) a~ ~ pINE I EXPOSED CMU \ dYl POOL WALL \ _ ~ k ~j/ ~j~ / PINE ~ ~ I ` TOP Oi-BONZ / 6" I TOP OF BANK ~ ! ~ ~ / ~ PINE 6-2012 1 /j ~ iii / / _ ~r.~/ / . ~I ~ \ - ~'~~iii ~ / - - ~ ~ APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF = - ;ate I ~ //i ~ NOF~/ / / - - .SLOPE STABWZATION ~TM~F=-1~`~ - H6vF ~ ~/i / ~ UNDER CONSTRUCTION ~ ~ -l ~t_~ _ _~i% ~oN~ii i~ _ ~ -8~ / /PERM~~1-4738-04184/ IF BANK AFTER-~ - - / i ~ ) / I / / APPROXIMATE [STABILIZATION - / ~ 0/ \ _ - / TOP OF BANK AF1ER _ ~ - / ~ ~ ~ f / SLOPE STABILIZATION PROPOSED OUTDOOR ~ / / UMffS OF / ~ ~ ,SHOWER / \ ~ ~ PROXIMATE F1000 20NE VE / \ ~ g~ / / BOTTOM OF BANK AFTER - v ~ / \ SLOPE STABILIZATION 1 / \ / PROPOSED DECK / ~ ~ BOTTOM OF BANK / / 1 < ~ 6-zolz - /6/ / / O < BOTTOM OF BANK / SF 11-2012 / RocKY~/ ik/ SHORELWE 1968 Z ~ ~ ~ ~ / /~-BEACH / p0 ~ y1 `1- i / 1 • O • / / ON R E ti9 'S~ 'S01 'SO / / / UNDER ~ y y`Ly~ y'L~~ s ~ ~ _ ~ - 2 201 • \ ~~Sil ORELINE th01 R \ N 9g 4 N sr~~4,~s S y ~7p, 1 W • ~o~OgpFFO~,~c~ • ti s~ Peter Young, Chairman ~ Town Hall, 53095 Main Rd. Lauren Standish, Secretary ~ ~ P.O. Box 1179 'F Southold, NY 1 ] 971 ~'~Q~ ~.b~ Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631)765-6641 Conservation Advisory Council Town of Southold At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., June 12, 2013 the following recommendation was made: RALPH CARBONE to demolish portions of existing dwelling, covered porch and deck; construct new front porch, stairs, open decks and screened porch; construct new deck over roof of great room; new dormer; open deck over screened porch; new roof over existing Captain's walk; and 10' dia. stair tower. Located: East End Rd., Fishers Island. SCTM#1-2-5 The CAC did not make an inspection, therefore no recommendation was made. suFroL,r .lames P. Kfne. President p~ C P.O. Box 1179 Boh Ghosio, .I r.~Vice-Pmsldcm j ~S Soulhold,NY 11971 Deve k3ereen ~ ~ Telephone (631 765-1892 John liredemeyer ~ ~ Pax (631) 765-6641 Michael .I. Domino y~p1 ~ ~aor Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection/VVork Session Report J.M.O. Environmental Consulting on behalf of RALPH CARBONE requests a Wetland Permit to remove ±15' of existing dwelling, cantilevered porches attached to dwelling, covered deck facing northeast, and front porch; construct a new 8.6'x21.6' front porch; a 6'x20' side entry porch; construct a stair tower; construct a screened porch on easterly side of dwelling; construct wrap-around open decks with stairs; construct a 13.6'x17' deck over roof of great room; construct a dormer on northeast side; and construct an outdoor shower. Located: East End Road, Fishers Island. SCTM# 1-2-5 Type of area to be impacted: ~ ~ So ~ n -Saltwater Wetland -Freshwater Wetland -Sound -Bay Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: ~ii(iapt.275 Chapt. 111 -other Type of Application: "'Wetland -Coastal Erosion -Amendment Administrative_Emergency -Pre-Submission Violation Info needed: Modifications: Conditions: Present Were: King ~B. Ghosio ~D. Bergen, ?J. Bredemeyer ~--Michael Domino D. Dzenkowski other Form filled out in the field by J r` ~ ~ Mailed/Faxed to: Date: ii~r Vnt ~ . JF . 1~ ~~uw A Y ~ ~ en t ~W.~ ~ .~~'~te ° '+91fi~ 7K ~F, ~ ~ r s ~ ~ ~ x ~~c t ~a ~ ~ , 1~„> ~ ~#g t W t S~ y ~ < 4' E ~ ~u q F 'y t x I I I t e 1 I -zR'~ d ~ n ~ N yy` Y' C • , ,~3~ ~ ~,p~ `n.. a~ ~~Y ,r` ` ~ ,d ~ x., s s ft r ~4 ~ ~ ~ ,C .~fl~~ ~ Y ~ i n b,~' ~ ~ , ~ 4- .t ~ i ~ 1~ ~ t y. o- ~ ~ a ~ •i 1'. s t ~ ~ s e ~~y T~ ~ ~~4 r ~j p ~ ; ~ 4x1 ~ l* r, ~.f~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ o _ ~ w , z > ~ ~ ~ ' a ~?-ti ' ~ _ P' r ;1:~4~'~ ' ~ pig ~ ~J~ ~ a : ~ . x N i't Y4 b .A~i yR ~ .P I' ~{4:~z~ ~ ii~~~u'" :Y:.....~.r_ p atr f^~ f~ ~n n ~Yyr, > ~ /F ~ z~ : X41 c ~a~ '7Y ~ j,~a~ , ,may,,,, .r„,' ax'° ,yam 7. 'x,rw~"""e~ < P ~ fi~ .b~'~ ~ r~"~ f z ~ < F e:; ! ~ rt e 1 Jf.., i . 1-fJl1VlJ 1J3411Y, 1\ L VVJ IV ~ V W~,fY 1\1LLt/J w~v a va • • ~O~ Address Fishers Island, NY lQj j Get Google Maps on your phone Text the word "GMAPS"to 466453 s f ~ ; > f ~ F t ~ ~ 1 3 ~ i x L k 3 ~ ~ ¢ '7 r , a Vi ~ _ . - Y F ~ A R v ~ n f, J ~ Czt ,~~-i„vs ~ a3' ~ ,ff, ( 'd 1~ h 3 f a~ h T d ~ •W y.N ~ y ~s Y ~ 1 _ r }r :d 1 `S y j x ~ A'~ o`5\S Gp _ MR ~ ~fi ' ~ ~e Rd ~ ar. 4~ M s ~ ~ '1 ~ .r ~ ~ ~ T i •ap,Pcn~Y n ~ a ~ r ~ 4 ? h4 / 1'~ 4 L ~ i .ire POntl ~s F; _.~y as 1 r' i ~x f 'w~ ya "vh _ 1 ,r ~ I l~+~x,.7 xe ie$en5r~'~e'. 14.ka C'L'+S ! y. y ~ ~C y 1~~~ ~ ts ~V RJ ?nS n t a r 6J t r s r:~' a~ ~ c ~ d p _ r a~ t r., na ` ~ b s ~ ~ x ; a'' 'a'; y ~a s E ~ .,v i rW c 1 g tl' ofy Y a 5 ,p nN~ %s 5 l~ a 1 k ~ A° # h j' 3 . pY01a (ifiopYti http://maps.google.com/maps?f=g8csource=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=Fishers+Island,+N... 4/16/2013 N ~r ~ _ /,Lu /i . a. / ~ ~ ~ _ ~:w a ~ / _ , j ~~j ~ ~ / i ~ ~ / ' J j ~ j~ ,.r~ ~ ~T i% ,a i it \ .w~ ~ _ '^y _ _a O ~ no*r.~ fAUMVOF SUFFOLK © 'e 1OM 2.1 z --P__ ReY P~~FPORY TU 9ahcefgenry i s 'I OFFICE LOCATION: ~~OF SO(/ryO MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex ~0 P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 # ~ Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs AveJ Southold, NY 11971 G Q Telephone: 631 765-1935 ~ i~ Fax: 631765-3136 ~y00UNTY,N~ LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD o~~~a~~D D MEMORANDUM JUN 1 4 2013 Southold own r To: Jim King, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: June 13, 2013 Re: LWRP Coastal Consistency Review for RALPH CARBONE SCTM# 1000-1-2-5. J.M.O. Environmental Consulting on behalf of RALPH CARBONE requests a Wetland Permit to remove t15' of existing dwelling, cantilevered porches attached to dwelling, covered deck facing northeast, and front porch; construct a new 8.6'x21.6' front porch; a 6'x20' side entry porch; construct a stair tower; construct a screened porch on easterly side of dwelling; construct wrap-around open decks with stairs; construct a 13.6'x17' deck over roof of great room; construct a dormer on northeast side; and construct an outdoor shower. Located: East End Road, Fishers Island. SCTM# 1-2-5 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed actions are CONSISTENT with the LWRP Policies and therefore, CONSISTENT with the LWRP. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney James F. King, President ~o~~Of SO~j~o~ Town Hall Anne: Bob Ghosio, Jr., Vice-President b4976 Main Road P.O. Bo:1179 Dave Bergen ~ ~ Southold, New Yark 11971-0959 Joha Bredemeyer ~ Michael J. Domino ~ Telephone (891) 786-1892 ~~.~aetm,~' Fa: (831) 786-8841 i, BOARD OF TOWN TRU9TEE9 TOWN OF 30UTHOLD i OfAce Use Onty AA ~ -Coastal Erosion Permit Application D E V E I~ E ~C wetland Pernut Application Administrative Permit ~ _AmendmenNl' ~sf /Extension ~Receivea Applicat;on:' Y a6 j ~c-ReceiroaFce:s APR 2 6 2013 , ~Camplerod Application -Incomplete _SEQRACIaaeification: tlald own i Typo I_Type II_Ualisted . _Caordimtion:(dste sent) , LWRP Consistency A Form .5 /3~~i "L CAC Referral Sant /3 Date of Inspection: -Receipt of CAC R Lead Agawy Determination: Tecbnical Review: Public Heating Held:- ~ -Resolution: °I 1 Name of Applicant Ralph Carbone Mailing Address 635 Tudor Drive Cheshire, CT 06410 phone Number:( ) 203-250-91 Al i Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - 1 - 5 Property Location: East F,nd Road, Fishers Island (provide LILCO Pole distance to cross streets, and location) ' AGENT: Glenn E. Just-JMD Environmental Consulting ~ (If applicable) Address: P.O. Rox 447 Ouogue,NY 11959-0447 631-653-0607 Phone: 5~~ C~(~~~ ~d of Trustees Appliaation~ GENERAL DATA Land Area (in squaw feet): 2 ' 3 acres Area Zoning: x-,~ Previous useofproperty: Single family dwelling Intended use of Single family dwelling ProP~tY~ Covenants and Restrictions on propert}fl Yes x No If "Yes", please provide a Dopy. Will this project require a Building Pertnit as per Town Code? Yes x No If "Yes", be advised this application will be reviewed by the Building Dept. prior to a Board of Trustee review and Elevation Plans will be required. Does this project require a variance from the Zoning Hoard of Appeals? Yes x No If "Yes", please pmvide copy of decision. Will this project require any demolition as per Town Code or as determined by the Building Dept.? Yes x No ~ Does the structure (s) on property have a valid Certificate of Occupancy? -x Yes No Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date Southold Town Trustees 2/20/13 N.Y.S.D.F'.C. 2/27/13 I ~ No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permibapproval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency7~_ No Yes i If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attacMnents if necessary): f Please see attached I 1. Demolition areas: Great Room facing water to be cut back 15ftC Cantilevered porch off of great room to be removed Existing covered deck facing North-East Existing front porch II. First Floor: New front porch 8'-6"x21'-6" Stair tower stair running from basement to second floor - l Oft dia Side entry porch - 6'x20' Open decks (see plans for dims} screened porch 16'x19' Exterior stair to lower level Second floor: Fili in corner at master bath 3'x6' New deck over roof of great room 13'-6"x17' Dormer at North East 8'-7"x3'-7" Open deck over screened porch- 16'x19' Third floor: New roof over existing Captain's walk Basement: Stair tower loft dia, III. Before: Three story house, 3 car garage, Total of 9 bedrooms and 8 1/2 baths, second floor master suite with a study, Lazge great room with cantilevered deck over water, Iarge screened porch at North East; enclosed Captain's walk at attic; The house has been renovated previously, ended up with a style similar to the "brady bunch" house. After: Three story house, 3 car garage, Total of 8 bedrooms and 8 1/2 baths, second floor master suite with an open deck over great room, new stair tower connects three levels, a great room with wrap around open decks; screened porch at North East; The renovation will restore the traditional look of the home. Applicant proposes to remove a portion of an existing single family dwelling and deck and construct a new deck, to remove a portion of an existing screened porch and deck and construct a screened porch and steps , to remove an existing deck and construct a new deck as per enclosed plans prepared by CME Associates last dated March 7, 2013 >~d of Trustees 1lpplioetioa • WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: Addition to dwelling, decks k Area ofwetlands on lot: 2 , 0 0 0 f~ Percent coverage of lot: Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: 7 6 feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: 9 o feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? x No Yes i If yes, how much material will be excavated? cubic yards How much material will be filled? cubic yazds Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: ' Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: i Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): the Proposed proiect should have no negative impacts the wetlands or Tidal waters of the Town I e~d of Trustees 1lppliaation ` COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposesofproposedadivity: Addition R decks I I Are wetlands present within 100 feet of the proposed activity? i No " Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling'? x No Yes i If Yes, how much material will be excavated? (cubic yards) t How much material will be filled? (cubic yards) I i Manner in which material will be removed of deposited: i. Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts to the subject property or neighboring properties reasonably anticigatod resulting from implementation of the project as proposed, including erosion incxease or adverse effects oa natural protective features. (Use attachments if necessary) There are no anticipated environmental impacts to the subject property or adiacent properties, The project will not increas erosioh or adverse impacts on natural protective features i f ' • 817.20 , Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I -PROJECT INFORMATION To be com leted b A Ilcant or Pro ect S onsor 1. APPLICANTISPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME Ralph Carbone Storm Sandy repair & erosion control 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Fishers Island County Suffolk Municipality 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road Intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map) 6227 Castle Road Location map and survey enclosed 5. PROPOSED ACTION IS: a New ~ Expansion ~ ModiflcatloNatteretlon 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Please see attached 7. AMOUNT OF IAND AFFECTED: Initially 0.25 aces Ultimately 0.25 acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? a Ye8 ~ No If No, describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? n Residential ~ Industrial ~ Commercial ~ Agriculture ~ Park/ForesUOpen Space ~ Other Dearn e: Single family dwellings 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? Yes ~ No If Yes, list agency(s) name and pertniVapprovals: N.Y.S.D.E.C. & Southold Town Trustees 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? Yea ~ No It Yes, list agenq(s) name aM perrniVapprovels: 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? Yea No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFOR N P VIDE BOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ~ ApplicanUSponsor name: Glenn E. h t as • t Date: / / / { Signature: ~ ~~"YY--"""YY"'~"""__ If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment oven 1 Reset Applicant proposes to remove a portion of an existing single family dwelling and deck and construct a new deck, to remove a portion of an existing screened porch and deck and construct a screened porch and steps , to remove an existing deck and construct a new deck as per enclosed plans prepared by CME Associates last dated March 7, 2013 PART II - IMPACT ASSESSMENT T~ com leted b Lead A enc A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.4? It yes, coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. Yes ~ No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.6? If No, a negative deGaralion may be superseded by another involved agency. Yes ~ No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, if legible) C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic pattern, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or Flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as oificially adopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain briefly: C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly: C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1-C5? Explain briefly: C7. Other impacts (inGuding changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly: D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREA (CEA)? Yes ~ No If Yes, explain briefly: E. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? Yes ~ No If Yes, explain briefly: PART III -DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (Ta be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessetl in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. If question D of Part II was checked yes, the determination of significance must evaluate the potential impact of the proposed action on the environmental characteristics ofthe CEA. Chedr this box if you have ident~ed one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed direGly to the FUL EAF and/or prepare a positive deGaralion. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysisabove and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WlL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide, on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination Board of Trustees ?U~ ~ ~ Z p ~ Name o Lead Agency ate R ~ ~ f r : ~ ~ President Print or Type Name of esponsible Officer in Lead Agenq Trtle of Responsible Officer ignature o esponsi le cer' Lead gency ignature o reparer (1 rent rom responsible o cer) • ' "~'~~V~ JUN 1 g 2 PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ~ X13 ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT n=~ Name: Address: Horse Head Corporation, 8717 McDonogh Road, Baltimore, MD 21208 William Lee Hanley, Jr Revocable Trust, 250 Jungle Rd. FL,m33480h Ralph & Lauryn Carbone, 635 Tudor Drive, Cheshire, Ct 06410 STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Glenn F.. Just ,residing at 1 21 Jessup Avenue nuoque, NY ,being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the day of ~~-llpe _ , 20~, deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at k~~ ?P.~I»~~ ~ ,that said Noti er mailed to each of said persons by CERTIFIED MAIL%R~TURN RECEIPT. Swom to before me this l 4 Day of ~7LeELQ , 20 (3 ~ g' ~ g ~ PuE c, S~ie~d tk~w voAc t otary Public No. 01C6T1~7q9~i Canty ~ExNra,. M2p/A18 JLN-4-2013 16 FROM: ~ 29(38164 86092878% P.1~1 lyfK.t I'. King. FrGCidml ~~`~C l iiwn Hull, 5)lM$ Mniu NJ. Bub dhusiu. lr.. Vitt~l'rtKidunt ~ I'.(). noK 1179 Uevu Bergen ~ Southold. NV 11971 JohnBrodcmoyer f 1'alephtxte(63I)763•Itt92 Mmhxcl 1. Uomino * I'ax t6)I) 7fiW~611 60AI2D OF TOWN TRIISTEEti TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DE ~°j~ BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF 30iTTHOT,A JUN ~ g , In tho Mattor of the Application of ~LPH CARBONE awn COTJNTY OF SUFFOLK) S1'A7`E OF NEW YURK) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING; 7YI aF- CUMPL/;7ED A/'TFR PW7ING REM/NS 1N PLACL FUR 6ICHT DAYS I - ,residing at Jdba (.r ^N. ~ being duly sworn, depose and say: "Phat on the ' day of i v ' , 201 T personally posted the pmpelty known as by placing the oard of Trusters official r where it can easily sect[, told that I have checked to be sure the palter has remained in place for eight days prior to tho date of the public hearing. Date of hearing noted thereon to be held Wa»lnc~dav. June 19.2013. Dated: _ t ('l {sibnature) i Sworn ro before tae. this 'fu/~~ day of 1 0~, ray Cannlisawn Expires Marcn3l,?A18 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, concerning this property. ~ OWNER(S) OF RECORD: I~o~.IP1, ~'o~r~e. SUBJECT OF PUBLIC H EARI NG ~ To remove ±15' of existing dwelling, cantilevered porches attached to dwelling, covered deck facing northeast, and front porch; construct a new 8.6'x21.6' front porch; a 6'x20' side entry porch; construct a stair tower; construct a screened porch on easterly side of dwelling; construct wrap-around open decks with stairs; construct a 13.6'x17' deck over roof of great room; construct a dormer on northeast side; and construct an outdoor shower. TIME & DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: ~ y, T~~ ~9, ~?3 -~-o~~~-s: FPM If you have an interest in this project, you are invited to view the Town file(s) which are available for inspection prior to the day of the hearing during normal business days between the hours o} 8 a.m and 4 p.m. BOARD OF TRUSTEES * TOWN OF SOUTHOLD * (631) 765-1892 . ~ o! 7rueteae Appliaatioa i AU'CHORiT.ATION (where the applicant is not the owner) 1, residing atJo ~ ) ~Do 2 ~2.1v ~ riot owner of property) ~ (mailing address) ' ~ C')-~f 5~ 1 CT (p~ IDdo hereby authorize ~ ~ `~`t ~ (Agent) ~~"p ~Y~L1i ft1:nYY10~',6 ~ ~ to apply for permit(s) from the Southold of Town Trustees on my behalf. 1 en's signature) I a! Trnatses Application ` C rnmty of Snff~lk :iiaic vi ivcw ~i uis ~ l-fJJPa°iU~ BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK ~4T ::..L BE DONE W THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY Ac a aponuEn Ry'?'I.1$ Snr rrcrrJLD Tnpi7N BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAAMSS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S). IF GRANTED. IN COMPLBTING THIS j . APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIE OF THIS PLICATION. I Si of Property Owner ~ SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 3 ~ DAY OF D _ m I~~20 /oL otary Public ' My Canmission Expires March 31, 2016 1 r • ~ l i p. APPLICANTIAGENT/REPRESENTATIV E TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM I, i. ~p of C.•~Id's Cn~ of Ei~ oroh"'n confli. ~ of ntereat on the nay of rows oRlcros and aoeloveea The o~+"nts of ~ ~.mm is ro txoide infainaiion w~i~ cae alert the row:. of oos`nbla C0liflicls of Ifiter~t and slew d m tss±+ whettwer action is ! tKC~arv ro avoid same. ` Yofm NA>+>E~3-~1 NI r',~ iJF . J t~ tortes. flirt narae. gdddla 'rid, uokaf a ffie applying W the llama of } sonttoae else or odta entity, such es a oompmry. If s0. todicatP thb.other ~ I peraon'sorcoropeny'an®naJ ~ NAME OF APPLICATfON: (C(xcic ell fttatappty.) . , Tex grievance Buildlog Variance Tnudce Change of Zone _ Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring ~ Ezemptloe from plat or offleial map Planning ~ ~ ~ Other ~ (If"Otltd', name the ectiviry.) ~ j 'i Do you personally (or tAtouglt yom roa'~'Y, spouse, sibling, patent, or child) haw a mhttattsltip with avy offiar or employee of the Town of Southold? "RelMion.+hip/' laeiudee by blood mecr7age, ar buimess }ntrmt "Husinas mteraf' maam a business. - inclining a perhraship, in which the town officer ~ employee has even n panial ownership of (ar esnpbymeM by) a wtporatioa ' j in whkir the town oHlar or empbyee otvm nary than S%of the shams. YES NO If you answered "YES", mmplem the 6elaoce of Utla form and date and sign wham iraliceted. ~ ~ _ Name of person employed by the Town of Southold ~ ~ 7'itk or position of that person - Describe the mhdionahip between yourseiP(the appfiwoUa~nNreprventdive) sad the town officer or empkryce. Either chock I the appropriate lino A) through D) mdror deaiba in the space provided. r I The town ofliar a empkyce m his or Iw spatrse, sibling, pareR, of dtiW is (clack ail that apptyr i~ . i _A) the owner of gmaterthan 5%ofthe shores of the oorporde stock of14e applkaot - , (wbeo tla tppliceot is a - - - I oaY ~ _B) dte legal orbenefieial ovmrr of aey inkra+t N a ron-ompota6e eotlry (w~hEn the applicant is act a mrPOretioak - i ^C) an officer. dinecror, partner, ar empbyee of the appGea~ or _D) the ecbml applicarn. , DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSfpP I C ~i. sub,nit0ed .31 as siio~ ;C Signattue. ~yLx PrintN SQ I').Q ~lo~ C~Qaz'~~ ~i Form TS I ~1y Commission Expires March 31, 2018 , I APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENI'i1TIVE i TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM l 1ffi T e - r f Pthip txohibita a-flips of imert_. on LM os.~ oftown offasaa a~ emolo s pl.~nse of - ! . tt~' f~~4ygr ryQVide inrorme~ion vv:~~cu c~ s!M tha man of oossibk conflicts ofilnkmst and allow tt14 telm whatever echon~s rxcessarv to avoid same, - ~ ~ , YpUANAME: Just G1enn,,F, - - j;~ (1.eat name, first rteraq.gdddle initid, uttkss you am applylag (a the name of someone else or other eolily, such as a compevy. If ta, htdicate the other person's or ootnpmy's mine.) , ]9AhlB OF APPLICATION: (Cluck ell thuapply.) Tex grievance Building ~ Valance 7huxe 3c Change of Zone CoasWF.rosion X Approval of pkt Mooring Exemption from pot or official map Plmaiog _ ' ; Other i~ I; (If"Odter', mnu pre activity.) ~ Do you personalty (or through your company, slxwx, sitiling, pamrd, a child) have a mlatiomhip with any oar or employee of the Town of Southold? °Relatiauhip" includes by blood, rpsrtiagq or business ipxreat "Busirress interest" meets a busitias, including a partnership, in which the town offiar or employee het even a partki ownership of (or employment by) a corporation ; i' in which the town officer or empkyce owrn mom then S%of the shams YES NO x , lfyou answered "YES", complete the balance of this form end pax and sign whom indica2d. f i Name of person employed by the Town of Soutltold 73tk nr position of t6~ person - Describe the mhtionship between yourself (the applicatUageadrepmsentslive) arrd the towo officer or empbyee. Either check ~ the appropriex line A) through D) andlor desulbe in tlu space provided. . The mwn otlicer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling perms, ar child is (cherY aHtiiat apply): A} the owner of greaxr than S%of the shares of the corporax stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporatioe); ~ , _Hj the legal orbeneflcial owner of any interest w anon-wrpomte entity (when tha ~ . i. eppliant k sot a eorporalion); - ^C) m officer, dimctoy pararer or empbyee of the applicant: or ~ ,^D) the ecmel applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSli1P - j~~ I~ ~i i Submittedthi of a 4 ~:j Signatuta f Prim Name Glenn F " Form 15 1 o Town of Southold Erosion, Sedimentation 8 Stonin-Water Run-oif ASSESSMENT FORM tteoPamr txATaN: e.c.T.r. t. THE FOLLOMINO AOTIONS MAT REgOIRE TlIE BYOMISEION OF A ~ ~~2-tr~- RFMIEWATEA O N O GRA1 RO E'fATE O OL SCOPE OF WORK -PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ITEM N /WORK ASSESSMENT Yu No e. Wha/ k IFm Tod ArN d the Project Peroak7 ~ Wit tilt Projad Retain AI Storm-WaOar RunOlf (IndWe Tofal Area d sN Parcae ktceled whin 2 . 3 Generated by a Two (231nch Ralnkh an Bile? ? the Sopee d Work for Proposed Construction) (Tltk Mazrl wis kccluda Y pewit oreebd by ails b. Whet Y the Tool Area d Land Cieartrrg (S.P.! ~1 cieedrrg andlor consuuctlon actlvitlas ~ vial O dl - X" endlor Ground Disturbertcs for the proposed 3 , 0 0 0 site trnplwemema end the permanerd creatiwt or _ constnrction actlvityt Irrgmrvloue eurfacea.) ta.P.lAV•s) '1 Does the Site Plan artN« Survey Strew All Proposed PROVmE BR~F PROIFiLT DE4CRIP1'tON tw.+•t,mrr P.auma~M.l Dralnege3Wduras lndkatlrrg SzeBLocatlon?Thk ? Item shah InGUtle all Proposed Grade Charges and - Y 3ktpss Cordohing Wakr Flow. ' $ Doan tire Sits Plan sndlor Survey deaedbe dra erosion ? Please see attached end sedimentcor4olpnctlcesthatwlllausedb - Y cantrd she eroelon end storm wekv dLxdterges. This harp must be memtaktad Uraghoul tle Errtin Construction Pedod. 4 WB ark Project Requre arty Land FlNing, Gang or Fxcavatlon where then k a Change a the NeWrei Exlstlng Grads InvoMng more then 200 Cubic Yards ~ - dMaterial vritltin my Percel7 ~ rJ WIII tlda Appibetlan Regtdre Land DiaWrhing AdHhlm a Erwompeasmg an Area M Excess d Five Thousand X- (5,000 S.F.) Square Feat d Ground Surfece7 ~ 8 Is tlreta a NaturN Water Coupe Runrdng Qeough the 31x7 Is Ws PnJeat vdtl*r tits Tnwtaee juradidion G rr OEC eyspPP nmarun.rr: or whhln One Hundred (100') feat of a WetleM or - auamk•bn d • tiWPPP Y nquY•d M Y tbre•uWan .Mare awaM1'kq sal BeachT ~ dkhabwAe•dar (t)«mom acros: erWYq dkmmrr•afkr than ore sae btn 7 Wip lFlralre Sito prgreretlon on Edsttrg Grade Stapes ? 'i •m prtd•kra•rwmm•n pkn deA wO uNmeWydrMbararaan ems•dknd: whkh Exceed Ffhaen (15)feetdVerticel Riseb X inrrrdtrp CnrelnWbn•rvmr AnWNp sal deerrkan•r alkr M•n ore (t)ern rvlrera One Hundred (100')dHorlmnW Dkhtwe? era DEC hr deanrikwd bN s aPDEB prmsk nquYad aaebrm vmar eechaigr. (trwPFP'e slr.a ewetlM Nhrknum R•euir•m•trb det• ePOea ts•rrerN Parma $ Vmll Ddvawaya, Perking Arses ar Wtrs Impervious ! I_ . M abort Wear WMrpee h«n C•rr•brWn rtlvly • P•neR Ile. GP4~Ieeet.) Surfaces be Sloped b Direst StamfWeter Run-0R X ~ ~ 7.7M BWPPP eMll W p•pea0 prl« b Ma •ukMal dNe /1nL Ths NOI ehel r kite endlor In the dtractlon da Town right-oM1weyt ~ ~ srbnilMber geP.r•reed gbrbtlw •amnrraenrntAmr•rsxi•n ectklry. 9 WIII Iha Project Require tiro flacernantdMaterid, 2. Th• 8a7PPP •hel tle•eb• tlwemelon end tadrwm wmml Mrar• arrd Mrae roqulnd prPa«iaudlm «ama•ss mreerwm preesre m•cwl tw urd arobr Removal d Vegmetlon andlor the ComtrtrcMon d erry yt mnemru.d b mdroe th. paMank b elomr wet«diwirryrwd b eewee Item Witldn the Town RlgMot-Way or Road 9houldar ~ i c«npMnee Wdr Uie arrrr entl mndhrremmb penNl aaddrbn, tlr•tPNPPP .het A~7prx.e.muarterrrna.ra.rwrenr«n..a Awr•J Id•ntlfY Darer•M terror of pWitlon wNd. mry mmne•y r •~amr m slam ere ht1'R a Any Anewr a Wrrbr On• tlrraeeh Nre a Ane•wr nOr .Cheri Mrs I'i . qutrydebmvnarraealrgr. r•awr•m1lM ammrnctlen eta A•eu•erw khaM•n e,••deF.itArn None, I~ 3. N SMMPP• Chet ngie tlr poNmneNVUbn el«muetermres~n P~ a 61onn•Wrx. Cremne. «aln•q 8 ba•bn Coenol Pan Y eegWad W ew Totm d rorne«wv e1Wl M taeAred Dye areas Oeetpn ProlwbrW Lr•red In taw Vark 8aoe~ re y„r ba tw•marw br R•vlt. Pd«a wwnw orAnP swmina PandL ! deaklanwrdaeeN•kr tlerPMpW eM pnrbr•«Sbrmwear Mrrasenwm. HorE: Aa.atan(ltew>NOww a•rm ooeeamrrka..e a.owipw.roarrseot STATE OF NEW YORK. Suffolk II COUM'Y OF SS 11tat I.....~'i.~,~F.).S.I...E."--~7.11rS.~..........._ beurg duly swum, delis and uys that he/she is the apphtant for Pemut, pl•m•dlMdduY •gNne DOOimmq Md that he/she u the Age n t (onnr, Conb•dor, Aern~ eervor•r Cmra, Me.) Owner and/or represenative of the Owner or Ownen, and is duly wthorized ro perform or juve performed the said work and to ~ ~ " make and tilt this apphcation; that all sntcments contained in this apphation ace tore ro the best his Icnowl and belid; and ! that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the apphcation filed herewith. ! Swom to before me this; ~.~..+h day of..... ~~.~..J._ , 20. ~_3 I . Notary Publir....2!r~'~::!~ c C i (sgneva ar ) FORM - 06/10 GINA A. LOCKE No.01 L00057960 ,?b bEss~~ I~ Applicant proposes to remove a portion of an existing single family dwelling and deck and construct a new deck, to remove a portion of an existing screened porch and deck and construct a screened porch and steps , to remove an existing deck and construct a new deck as per enclosed plans prepared by CME Associates last dated March 7, 201 Town of Southold r vVRp CONSI~'TENCY ASSESSh1EN'T FORM i A. INSTRUCTIONS ~ i. All applicants for permits' including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other infom~aGon used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. 'Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits i and ocher ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form. should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A prouosed action will be evaluated. as to its si~ificant beneficial and adverse effects anon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Townl. 3: If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thas each answer moat 6e ez„plamed in detail, listine both suauortias and non- auooortin¢facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's websibe (southoldtown.northfork.net), the $oard of Tnrstees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. ' B. DESCRIPTION OF STYE AND PROPOSED ACTION i SCI'M# 1 2 5 PROJECT NAME Proposed addition and decks The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board ? Plannmg Board ? BaiMing Dept. ? Board of Traatoea 0 ~ I 1. Category ofTown of Southold agency action (check appropriate jespon,9e): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital ? construction, planniag activity, agency regulation, land transaction) ? tb) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) ~ (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: I Nature and extent of action: ~ Please see attached Applicant proposes to remove a portion of an existing single family dwelling and deck and construct a new deck, to remove a portion of an existing screened porch and deck and construct a screened porch and steps , to remove an existing deck and construct a new deck as per enclosed plans prepared by CME Associates last dated March 7, 2013 • Lo~onofactiotL East End Road, no Fishers Island Site acrrsge: Presentlaaduse: Single family dwelling Present zoning classification: R -1 2 B ' 2. If an application for the proposed action has bees 51ed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: r (a) Name of applicant: Ralph Carbone ro) Mailingaddtrss: 635 Tudor Drive. ~ I Cheshire, CT 06410 I i. (c) Telephone number: AreaClodeO 203-250-4181 j l Applicatiannumber, d,~y. Unknown 1 Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? N.Y.S.D.E.C. Yes ®No ? If yes, which state or federal agency? f C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support er ~ not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Inrnmplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY I' Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastractare, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ®Yes ~ No ~ Not Applicable The proiect does not involve "development" and ho~lrr hav nn j imAaCt UAOn 051P~csaf`P„ nT rhP ha ra[~tar of tha rnmmiini t~ Tf is felt that this proiect is consis n with hi Rol_icy I i Auach additioasl sheets if oeauary I Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic sad archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III =Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria © Yes ? No ? Not Applicable ~i The project sha~ have no impact upon any h~toric or archaeologin~t co rr c ;c P1 that thi. ro~PCt is conai etant wit~,thic pnlir~ I Attach additional sheets if necessary j Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LW12P Section III -Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Q Yoe ? No ? Not Applicable i The Proiect will have no ;mp3~nnn cran;r s = per the visual Quality of the Town rt ;c tptt that rh; P=nj~r is consistent with this policv i Attach additional sheets if accessary j NATURAL COAST POLICIES j Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRp Section III -Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria Yes O No ~ Not Applicable j i I' Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III -Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria © Yes ~ No ?NotApplicable The proiect shall have no impact uRon the ;vat;ty nr nnanr;ro of potable water. It is felt that this pro~et is rrnnci cronr with this policy Attach eddhional cheats if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Soathold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Iiabitab and wetlands. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. ? ? Yee No Not Applicable The project shall have no negative impacts upon the, quality or function o any wet ands, ecosy~ms or areas o S3gn1 scan ~ oas a is. an i e a a s, >.s a >.s pro~ec ~ i c nnnci c4cni~ r;+,i ?-h fhi c >,nl ~ I. i i i Attach additieaal shaeta if necessary j Policy 7. Protect sad improve air gna4ty in the Town of 3oathotd. See LWRP Sectfoa III - Policies ~ Pages 32 throngh 34 for evaluation criteria. ® Ya Q No ~ Not Applicable i The project shall have no impact upon air quality. Zt is ~ i felt that this project is consistent With this policy j. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy S. 11linim;~e environmental degradation io Tows of 3ont6old from solid waste and hazardona snbatances and wastes. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Pages 34 throagb 38 for evaluation criteria. Xee ? No ? Not Applinble The project does not involve the use of or disposal of solid i waste or hazardous substances and wastes. It is felt that j this prof ;c ona;c n with th,b.5c policy i PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide far public access to, aad recreational use of, coastal waters, public leads, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria Yet--~ No ~ Not Applicable This project will have no impact upon public access to, and i _-~}tc ronrccl-inn=1 nca nf~ ci- 1 he~c ntthl' land r 7 hha nnhlir racnnrr•ac of 1-ha Tnr`R 7t is falt i-hat hhi prof ct ; on i nt with thi policy Attach additional sheets if necessary • WORKING COAST POLIC ~ ~ ~ Policy 10. Protect Sonthold'a water-depeada?t Haas and promote Biting of near ~vaterdepeadent uses ie aaitabk bcationa. See LWRP Section III-Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evahufion criteria. Yee ? No ? Not AppUcabk ` The proiect wdril have no impact upon Southold's I. water-dependent uses or the siting of new I water-dependent uses in suitable locations. It j is felt that this project is consistent. with this polacy ~ i Attach additional sheets if necessary ~ Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resonrcea in Lang Island Souod, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluatbn criteria. ? Yes ? No ? Not App6cabie ` The project will have no impacts upon the substainable use of l i vi ng mari nc racniirr T?- ' g f l t 1-h 1•h' p_i r?- conGic n wi h hic o i y 1 Attach additional shoes if aeceseary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lends- in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ? Yea ? No ©Not Applicable The project does not involve agricultural lands. It felt r h o r h' ~-_~____-ot a pal 1 aht r th i ~p_aj r Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Pollciea; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ? Yea ? No ~ Not Applicable The proiect does not involve the use of or development of energy nr mineral racnurrac Tt is felt that Chic nn licy iG not< applicable to this proiect PREPARED BY Glenn E.. Just 'j'1'1'l,pi Agent DATE 4~I t31 ~ ~~~~V~ ~ D ._x .4 b APR 2 6 2013 ~ j %r o----- 4. , ~ ~1~~ w F_ fj ~ ~ -r~ - - ~ ,i A..~. ~ ~FGENp ~miaoxr ~ r ~ ~ _ _ aew roopnm wmoa ~ ~ aYklm. ~ g Vpo.n - CaW.m~ INeLL IM. ~ ~ v e, c.-.__ C u A n E BLOCK 1 mLI LOT TAA aq AREA = 1.30-E ACRES TCAM ONE (VACANT LAND) HOUSE U � m l� v c N C^ STIL E 3 tyro ❑ '" � � x a3 WALL 1-M 1-19 W 3 �Br+6'"so E i ROAD SILT FENCE O+ 23L3 , 1-2A Or 6i �\ -- WOVEN WIRE FENCE (MIN. 14 1-3A w m 'e, 0-0N /�� \ GRAVEL GAUGE W/ MAX. 6" MESH y DRIVEWAY SPACING) SITE c'3 z m WALL G +-JC '1"y CT N Q a ry / ✓ ,9, 1p � �\\ ti� \ \ \ / �\ \ r 1`1 10 MAX 3fi" MIN. LENGTH FENCE CE t-ze TITER TO POSTS DRIVEN MIN. 16" sy >. INTO GROUND MONEY rOND U o = / oARBOR � EXIS IN STONE AND (HOU6HTOW j5ll CONEREf\GUTTER 0 \J OF �yQa; , s� BLOCK 1 \ \ \ .I ISI ,-AA G,F o LOT IA \\ ,�/ \ \ \ ® i -/. HEIGHT OF 0 Oj (•_, _ AREA = 0.94± ACRES �\ \ \ \ / %\\\;\\jj\%/�/,,•�/•� FILTER = 16" MIN. V 11 EM N/F \\y\\�\�%/illi'. . EMBED FILTER n BENCHMARK MAG NAIL a Q \ \ \ \ WILLIAM L. HANLEY JR. o� "�` CLOTH A MIN. of ARBOR 3a' ELEVATION = 36.59 TREE s \\ T30' DRIvEWAY as 6" IN GROUND \ (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE) 3 MUNICIPAL WATER AND \ ON SITE SEPTIC SAWCUT DRIVEWAY 36 --\ GATE \ \ E SHEDG j LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION \ (.,�,•, C \ \\ PERSPECTIVE VIEW LOCATION MAP SCALE 1 "=400' 3 �1 \ o •041 PROPOSED NEW STONE GUTTER 1 \� \ EXISTING ROPA BURIED 1,o .n 38� PROPANE TANK \ W WOVEN WIRE FENCE MIN. 14 r o PAVED \\ ' \ PROPOSED NEW STEPS TO DECK ', - h PROPOSED COVERED ENTRY DRIVEWAY 0` T 01? N 1/2 GAUGE W/ MAX. 6" MESH I� 0 Arlt ,. A/C UNITS TO BE RELOCATED-",, B A ry9 V1 c o, z ' yo- N'� ' „p o o. SPACING) WITH FILTER CLOTH I 1 PROPOSED STONE WALK TREE JJ•p pr,' �B \ \ EXISTING SCREENED DECK TO BE REMOVED l m MAP REFERENCES 5N \ \ PORTIONS OF DECK TO REMAIN 36" MIN. FENCE POST o d % \ \ PROPOSED STAIR TOWER ADDITION '1 40 0 LANDSCAPE � N �. ; 40 'I PEO UNDISTURBED 1.) SURVEY OF PROPERTY OF HENRY LUCE III FISHERS ISLAND, NEW YORK PROPOSED PAVED DRIVEWAY 6" 1 \ PROPOSED SCREENED DECK FLOW GROUND SCALE: 1"=50 FT. CHANDLER & PALMER, ENGR'S, NORWICH, CONN. REVISIONS & I ' / t E%ISTING DRIVEWAY AND TREE \ \ TOP OF BANK 11-2012 \ OCT. 1969 ADDITIONS 12/6/82 Z, FOUNTAIN TO BE REMOVED �1 0�- AND TOP OF BANK AFTER \ G \ �•1" LOAM AND SEE MOVED / / GARAGE k WENT - EXISTING DECK TO SLOPE STABILIZATION / 1 BE REMOVED COMPACTED SOIL \ \ 2. COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREA MAP, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK SUB EL.3].4 1 J�,\/ ) ._..✓ ;•: JIB 12! k '20• w 2 / �I` I \ \ 1 A MIN. OF 6 IN GROUND \ / F ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION. HE NEW YORK STATE COUNTY, NEW YORK, SCALE 1" 200' SHEET 42 FI OF 49 PHOTO _ � EMBED FILTER CLOTH \\n` ., \�\' o DEPARTMENT 0 tO N0.3B 679 83 DATED 08/29/88 PREPARED BY T r / / BLO K 1 Lor lc TREE \ SECTION VIEW AREA = 2. #/�GRESRY R CHERRY \ OUNTAIN C ♦ FLAWN ! / BOTTOM TA BANK AFTER �QQ �°' o- \ � \3s \ \ \ �// � SLOPE STABILIZATION CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS TIDIES (n STONE REVETMENT 1.) THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED FOR THE PARTIES AND PURPOSE INDICATED z ��"�� o- 44 v UNDER CONSTRUCTION EXISTING STEPS DecK \ �/I BOTTOM OF BANK PERMIT /1-4738-04184/00001 HEREON. ANY EXTENSION OF THE USE BEYOND THE PURPOSED AGREED TO O AND PLANTERS 1 1 / �/ 1,-2m2 SEE APPROVED PIANS BY OC 1. WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO FENCE POSTS WITH WIRE BETWEEN THE CLIENT AND THE SURVEYOR EXCEEDS THE SCOPE OF THE n E "T" OR "U" TYPE OR ENGAGEMENT.N/F r0i e e\ / TO BE REMOVED } \ I 1 � / / COASTAL CONSULTANTS � TIES OR STAPLES, POSTS SHALL BE STEEL EITHER ENGAGEM T � ROBINSON & JEAN BAKER CHE \ sur=4afia i / /, ^ / / DATED of/te/2073 / HARDWOOD. Of STONE v �� / 2.) IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE STATE EDUCATION LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS > SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE I o eorroM OF BANK ( ) r WA / EXISTING / /�/�Y y� 6-zD,z Z. FILTER CLOTH TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WIRE FENCE WITH TIES ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, TO ALTER AN � O MUNICIPAL WATER AND s SPACED EVERY 24• AT TOP AND MID SECTION, FENCE SHALL BE WOVEN WIRE, ITEM IN ANY WAY. F- Y ON SITE SEPTIC PMKNG v 15" I 1 RESIDENCE I 443 �� ///��/ /// �/ TOP of BANK I 6" MAXIMUM MESH OPENING. Z N O z \PINE _ /// / / //� / l 6-2012 Q O I HOUSE / ^' / '{ `/ \ N 3. ONLY COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MARKED WITH THE LAND SURVEYOR'S � 0 Y IL LLI Lll mr ✓ m� // 3. WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER THEY SHALL BE SIGNATURE AND AN ORIGINAL EMBOSSED OR INK SEAL ARE THE PRODUCT OF GARDEN ��Pm , OVER-LAPPED BY SIX INCHES AND FOLDED, FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE EITHER - Z r I/ /- 00 �' 3/ // III //� �• FILTER X, MIRAFI 100X, STABILNKA T140N, OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. THE LAND SURVEYOR. F- 0 NUj PII Oo / to / �/ / -tl / / Z L� Q N Z - \ Y •P 46 n I5 ` e / '% % / / 1 / / / / 4.,PREFABRICATED UNITS SHALL BE GEOFAB, ENVIROFE DC MATER APPROVED - 4.) COORDINATE DISTANCES ARE EAST END FROM U S. COAST AND GEODETIC m U m W PwE O �� / / EQUIVALENT. SURVEY TRIANGULATION STATION EAST END 2" a0 � o V) Pu+; ,W"Pw `�131nE PIN ^ `�' // /// / / / 5. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED AN L REMOVED WHEN 5. SITE IS IN THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK TAX MAP 1000, d Q 0 N Of ) 0 N w STONE / Eos / / // / / "BULGES" DEVELOP IN THE SILT FENCE. SECTION 001, BLOCK 2, LOT 5. �j I'D C, - Q �CCPr u^• QUIP STGNE -PINE PATIO / �/ / rte. _ q0 _/v HENT PATI° 4z r / LAWN yj // / / / / 6.) SITE IS LOCATED IN R-120 ZONE. O d a COASTHAZARD LINE GARDEN PINE/„NA\�1F11, 1411 �` tr �'� �' \ �� w `� LJ _ aQ in � 1 40 ,ri' ✓ PROPOSED DECK 7.) BASE FOR LEVELS: NGVD 1929. (n Q Q (SEE MAP REFERENCE No.2) E EXPOSED CMu "L vAI POOL WALL \ Qo // /// i / // 8.) PORTIONS OF THIS SITE LIE WITHIN FLOOD ZONES VE AS SHOWN ON FIRM, J w w / ( / / // / FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK COMMUNITY: TOWN Q = 1 l OF SOUTHOLD NUMBER: 360813 PANEL 41 OF 1026 MAP SUFFIX: H MAP Q NUMBER 36103COO411-1 MAP REVISED SEPTEMBER 25, 2009. 0 PINE 1\ TOP OF BANK �\ �// / / / J 6 6 z" TOP F BANK 11-2012 //% / U // N 9.) APPLICANT: RALPH CARBONE, JR. O ” PINE 6-2012 635 TUDOR DRIVE \ P `= I jib%/�� i / / // / CHESHIRE, CT /Viii% APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 10.) SITE IS SERVICED BY MUNICIPAL WATER AND ON SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SLOPE STABILIZATION SYSTEM. UNDER CONSTRUCTION SCONi//i/ -.6- / PERM�,/1-4738-04184/ 11.) TOTAL AREA OF 1A & RAE PROP ACRES PERCENT OF LOT COVERAGE PROPOSED = 5.37 �� / I APPROXIMATE EDGE OF EXISTING CANTILEVERED DECK m BOTTOM OF BANK AFTER \� % /�� J / / TOP OF BANK AFTER /' SLOPE STABILIZATION / 12. SLOPE STABILIZATION PERMITS: - --'/ \\��__�J / — SLOPE STABILIZATION PORTON OF EXISTING HOUSE •c��/PROPOSED OUTDOOR / / AND DECK TO BE REMOVED. NYSDEC D TRUSTEES LIMTIS OF / `-\- SHOWER / \ _/ PROXIMATE PROPOSED DECK SOUTHOLD TRUSTEES APPROVED 02-20-2013 FLOOD ZONE VE / \ �Vg/ /// / \ SLO PE EMSTABIUZATOOF BANK N�R ELEV'44'2± z L PROPOSED DECK / PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS LINE 0 01 B070M OF BANK / / OF SILT FENCE AND MAINTAIN - s-2012 6/ / THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION m B070M OF BANK ^/ / SEE DETAIL) 0 11_2012 / _r /Q/ SHORELINE 1968 SHORELINE BY DEED �' ' z �� //l/-BEACH // 9�p0 O q1 , to ONE REVETMENT " ,3' APPROVED BY UNDER CONSTRUCTION / yyti / ZS��/ BOARD OF TRUSTEES Itz Lu Q TOWN OF SOUTHOLD \ rJQ \ SHORELINE 1962 DATE - I„J mz \ N BITUMINOUS CONCRETE m a N 8�gg fs � 1-1/2" BINDER COURSE 4 o J a 0 LEGEND a " 41 C PROPERTY LINE m o m m m 7 O•ly ABUTTERS LINE - - 0 N m o w 12" ROLLED GRAVEL SUBBASE w o EDGE OF PAVEMENT IIT•••�� BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT EXISTING CONTOUR - - - 36 - - - l I' D o JO o L NOT TO SCALE STONE WALL IIuLnJ((', a m 0 Y Q HM RETAINING WALL APR 2 6 2013 DATE: MARCH 7, 2013 AREA OF PAVEMENT REMOVED = 4,233± SF FENCE X --* ---7- AREA OF NEW PAVEMENT= 4,6243 SF TREE LINE r SCALE: 1 = 30' o alO mm PROPOSED CONTOUR 44 PROJECT #2012828 SILT FENCE QUALITY CONTROL CERTIFICATION UTILITY POLE GROUP REVIEWED 11DA PROJECT MANAGER 30' 15' 0 30' BOUNDARY POINT 0 SHEET SURVEY 4J WATER VALVE ENVIRONMENTAL GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET W 1 OF avlL sTRucTURAL AftCHITECTORAL