Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-53.-5-12.6 (2)
L~ OFFICE LOCATION: o~~OF SOUfyol MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex ~ O P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 l~ J~f Southold, NY 11971 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) G Q Telephone: 631 765-1935 Southold, NY 11971 ~ Fax: 631765-3136 ~~y00UMV LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Leslie Weisman, Chair Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: June 24, 2013 Re: Coastal Consistency Review for ZBA IDO MIZRAHY (BREEZY SHORES #25) #6660 SCTM#1000-53-5-12.6 The structure is located within FEMA Flood Zone X. IDO MIZRAHY (BREEZY SHORES #25) #6660 - Request for Variance from Article XXIII Code Section 280-123A and the Building Inspector's March 7, 2013 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit for additions and alterations to an existing seasonal cottage at; 1) a nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged, reconstructed, structurally altered or moved, unless such building is changed to a conforming use, located at: #25 Breezy Shores Comm. Inc., 65490 Main Road (aka State Route 25 and Sage Blvd.) (adj. to Shelter Island Sound) Greenport, NY. SCTM#1000-53-5-12.6 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Gode and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my determination that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the below listed LWRP polices and therefore CONSISTENT with the LWRP provided the Board requires the following best management practices to further the below listed policies. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. M ~ ~ I Office Location: ~~~~F SUUj~ol~ Mailing Address: ~ O~ Town Annex /First Floor, Capital One Bards # * 53095 Main Road 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) ~ P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 ~ • ~O , Southold, NY 11971-0959 0~~,~~UNrl,~c'~ http: //sou[hold[own. northfork. ne[ BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 7(~~g9 2~~c (631) 765-9064 Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator MAY _ ~ Z~13 Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Southold, NY 11971 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. #6660 Breezy Shores Community, Inc. (Cottage # 25 ) 1000-53-5-12.6 Dear Mark: We have received an application for Additions and alterations to an existing seasonal cottage; non-conforming building with anon-conforming use. A copy of the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval under Chapter 280 (Zoning Code), and survey map, project description form, are attached for your reference. Your written evaluation with recommendations for this proposal, as required under the Code procedures of LWRP Section 268-SD is requested within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Thank you. Very truly yours, Leslie . W isman Chaff er o By: Encls. l C FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: March 7, 2013 TO: Frank Uellendahl PO Box 316 Greenport, NY 11944 Please take notice that your application dated March 4, 2013 For permit to make additions and alterations to an existing seasonal cottage at Location ofproperty: 65490 Route 25, Greenport, NY (Breezy Shores Cottage #25) County Tax Map No. 1000 -Section 53 Block 5 Lot 12.6 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: Theproposed additions and alterations aze not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII, Section 280-123 A., which states; "A nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlaz ee d, or structurallyaltered or moved, except as set forth below, unless the use of such buildin~is ed to a conformin use." Au rued Si Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING PERMIT APPLICA-LION CHECKLIST BUILDING DEPARTMENT Do ynu have a~ need the followine. before appkine" TOWN HP-LL Board of Heahh SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 d sets of Building Plans TEL: (631) 76~-1802 Planning Board ~pproval- FAX: (631) 765-9502 Survey _ SoutholdTown.North Fork.net PERMIT NO. check Septic Form_ _ N.Y.S. D.E.C. Trustees CO. Application flood Pennh Examined, 3p~ Single & Separate Stoint-Water Assessmem Form CmrtacC Approved .?0 Mail tc:~~lut[ ~I Y~ Disapproved a/c _ ~ Phone-~p 3~-~7~-~~Z~ Expiration .20 ~ ~ ~ ~ n , I Spector 11AA ' 4 2013 J APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Date 02/ZZ . ~O C3 ewc otrr. INSTRUCTIONS _ rest orsouptolo a. This application MUST be completely filled in by typewriter or in inl: and submitted [o the Building Inspector with 4 sets of plans, accurate plat plan ro scale. Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship ro adjoin ing premises or public streets or areas, and waterways. c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Buildine Permit, d. Upon approval of this application, [he Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to [he applicant Such a permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection [hrou:hout the work. e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose ~+~hat so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Certifca[e of Occupanty. f. Every building permit shall expire if the wort: authorized has not commenced within I? montlts after the date of Issuance or has not been completed wi[hio 18 months IYom such date. If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property have been enacted in the interim, the Buildine Inspector may authorize- in writing, the extension of the permit For an addition six months. Thereafter, a new permit shall be required- APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to [he Building Department for the issuance ofa Building Permit pursuant m the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk Counq~. New Yurk, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or Regulations, for the construction of buildings, additions. or alteratiats or for removal or demolition as herein described. The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances. building code. housing code, and regulations, and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. (5i_nature of applicant or name, if a corporaiionl (Mailing address of applicant) State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect. engineer, general contractor, elec[riciaq plumber or builder ,g2GGFt t~ Name of owner of premises /%JC ~I h(t _ (As on the tax roll or latest deed) If applicant is a corporation. signature of duly authorized officer (Name and title of corporate officer) Builders License No. _ Plumbers License No. Electricians License No. _ Other Trade's License No. _ L d-S I. Location of land on which proposed wort: will be clone- 25 4~~/a~El Z>e~~Y 5~ l2c-~~.~~~~`~ House Number Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section -5.~7 Block ~S Lot '7~ /2~ ihdkisinn _ - _.I'ilcd Map NU. Lm ~~tute c~tstine use and oecupenec n1 premis<: end inlende~l use .md ocalpattc~ nl plnposed eonstructf~n: a fvistina use and occupane~ ~~~~(7~i !RL ~SE~~y,(,+,L}C~ h Intended use and occupann_ /~E~![7 ~,(.~/l-~L ~ SCF3~Dil.1~-~~ - Aawre of wo[k (check which applicablel: Nets Buildine_ Addition ~ -Alteration Report Removal Demolition- Other Work_ (Description) Cstimated Cost ~ ~ ~GD I~ee ~JOC~ 00 - - - (To be paid on filing this application) If dwelling. number of dwelling units Number of dwelling units on each floor If garage, number of cars h. If business, commercial or mixed occupunc}. specify nauu-e and extent of each type of use. t t Dimensions of existing strucanes. II' um-. Frain 33 Reur ,35.~Depth 2CI - Height .v p Y Number of Stories / / r Dimensions or same structure with alterations or additions: Front .~.7. 4 Rear ~3 Depth 2G' ~ r Height ti ~2.~ ~ Number of Stories / I?imensirnts of entire new consintctinn'. Front Rear D4'p'Fh ' Height Number of Stories 9. Size of roc Front Rear Depth I (1. Date of Purchase 2 O(2 Name of Fourier Owner I I lone a' use district in which premises are situated I'_. Does proposed construction violate any zmtine law, ordinance or regulation'. YES- NO_ Will lot be re-graded? YES NO ~ Will excess till be removed from premises? YES ? NO 14. Names of Owner of ~re~rises SOD NP(~AZ'il~/ Address nJYG lp0~°J Phone No.(4G' 4 7r7 Name of Architect ~alLiivl~ GfBG~EV+GuGI Address SOP .'fib ,~/1/'/K44Phone No 63/ Name of Contractor Address ~-Phone No. 15 o. Is this property within 100 feet of n tidal s+~etland or a Geshwater wetland? *YES ~NO Ih YES. SOL'THOLD TOWN TRL'~STEES & D.E.C. PERMIT~NiAY BE REQUIRED. b. Is this property within 300 fee[ of a tidal wetland' YES- x10_ IF YES. D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE RGQL~IRED. I G. Provide sun~ey. [o scale. ~ridi accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 1 7. I I elevation at an< point on property Is al I0 ieer or 6elo~r. muss provide topogrq~hical data on sw~vey. 18.:Are there uric covenants and restrictions with respect ro this properrn'? YES- NO If YGS. PROVIDE .a COP('. ~l ATL OF NEW YORK( 5S COUATY OF~ ~~Cd/(A~~ ~j/~'~/EGy(~L(~ bein~_ dul_c sworn. deposes and sacs that (s)he is the applicant (Vmne of indlcidunl sisnine connzed aboee ranted. !S1Hc is the ~GGL/~~ (Conlnetur. Agent. Corporate OI ricer, etc.l of,uiJ oe net or o~~ners. and is duh authorized ro perform or hr~e performed the said wort: and [o make and file [his application; rimy all >lalemems cnn[ained In this applicaion ure tree to the hest of hls knowledge and belief; and that the work will be ~,wrlcrmed in the manner set lonh in the application tiled therewdh. moqo. e/~rn ro before me do ''BONNIE D. BUNCH GLWL~ dar of ~JZfCt21_30 ~t~s,~PUblc, State of Alew York _ _ -Pln rt9%Jfi185ncp - II ~ ~ n i ~ ftrla uhr -r, \ntan Puhbc ~i~tature of Appllcarn r _ { er. h Plled [ic- Assignmmn Diu. APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS AREA VARIANCE House No.~Street ~UZC 2~ Hamlet ~1pg27- SCTM 1000 Section 5,17 Block 5 Lot(s) /2 •/O Lot Size Ct~C Zone I (WE) APPEAL THE WRTfTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED 'Jj-Z-~/%S BASED ON SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED / -9 -ZO%3 ~~~/DEO 3-/`~' -ZUl3 q Applicant(s)/Owner(s): /DD L!/21~.4ffY~ ~t~y7/i/~r' ~ilreQl4 d Iit~ ~`X.GtI.[uU(~/ VCS. 22~oE Ztiict'~ /C Mailing Address: ,{J~/~, yDP~r ~IJCJ j ~ note 92~ ~~z~ir~~+,uy /rg52 L~%) Telephone:¢Lj~ 7Ds~(o Fax: Email: m/2r'aGiU, /C~o/'e~fMG=tr, ~ NOTE: [n addition to the above. please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney, agent, architect, builder, contract vendee, etc. and name of person who agent represents: PAO ~i~zte.~~Y Name of Representative:'7}'GtLL~LIe!/P./!7(~A/?~ for( )Owner~Other:~~~jKltO/e1e~ Address: /"~f>B t ~,Q.E~[/~/ (/q~• C~3i) Telephone: g77-~i(o2¢ Fax: Email:~/~u~CL1e~EL![~'etll ~1JLfit Please check to specify who you wish correspondence [o be marled to, from the above names: ( ) ApplicantlOwner(s), ~Q Authorized Representative, O Other Name/ Address below: WHEREBY THE BUII.DING INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED -ZL9/ and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED 2-22-(3 FOR: Building Permit ( )Certificate of Occupancy ()Pre-Certitica~e of Occupancy ( )Change of Use ( )Permit for As-Built Construction ( )Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article, Section, Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code.) / Article:.)CX'~r~ Section: .~~i(' Subsection: /23A Type of A peal. An Appeal is made for: ~A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ( ) A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law- Section 280-A. ( )Interpretation of the Town Code, Article Section ( )Reversal or Other A prior appeal ( ) has, ~ bas not been made at anv time with resaect to this property, UNDER Appeal Nn(s). Year(s). X20/ . (Please be sure m research before completing this quest' nor cal(our office for assistance) ~~aa ~o/ 3 it.~o ~i~~~EfY aer~z~- 5 ~oe~s ILFASONS FOIL APPEAL (!'lease be specr/i c, aadirfunul shrrt.~ mqr hr usrd ~rtA yrepurcr s signann~e notnri~edJ: I. An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighbor or a detriment to nearby properties if granted, because: ,y-/~~ SCC- ~ll.l.!'7~'NEd 2. The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for [he applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: SE-E A~l'A C.l-F-~ D 3. The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: SEA z~TCACH ED 4. The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: AZ~F-}~kE D 5. Has the alleged difficulty been self created? Yes, or { } No Why: tCf=~~-lk E~ Are there any Covenants or Restrictions concerning this land?~No { }Yes (please furnish a copy) This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserve and protect [he character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. i Signature o r Authorized Agent (Agent must mit written Authorization from Owner) Swom )}o ~be ore me this ~ day of M~Y - .20 13 OOPR'dIE G~. RUE~~~;H Notary PubFq State of Neer York v?-~~ y~ ~ ~ L No 09E'Jr185C50 ~ 7~ ~u ~ i.-r in S floh to~,ncJ Notary Public Comm ~n ~zp es F~ril ;c,<~1 Frank Wolfgang Uellendahl Architect 123 Central Ave POB 316 Greenport, NY 11944 t: 631.477.8624 e: frank@frankuellendahl.com April 30, 2013 r ~ ~ • Owner: Ido Miaahy Cottage #25 at Breery Shores Community, Inc. 65490 Route 25 Greenport, NY 11944 SCTM: 1000-53-5-12.6 Request for Variance: Proposed structural alterations to an existing seasonal cottage RE: APPLICATfON TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS PART A: AREA VARIANCE REASONS (1) An undeskable change vttll not be produced to the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, M granted, because: It hos been determined by the Town of Southold that all 28 seasonal cottages at Breery Shores Community, Inc. constitute non-conforming buildings containing anon-conforming residential use. Therefore the Building Department has determined that relief is required To undertake the proposed renovations and alterations because the structure will not be changed to a conforming use. The proposed alterations would raise the existing cottage by ca. 2 feet to allow the replacement of the existing damaged foundation os well as to obtain improved ceiling heights as per code. The existing roof pitch will remain unchanged. The proposed alterations will not cause a detriment change to the character of the neighborhood. Breery Shores represents its own neighborhood of 82.6 acres and is out of sight from adjacent properties (2) The benefli sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than a variance, because: Due to the preexisting non-conforming residential use of the cottage that cannot be changed, it is not possible to make the proposed repairs and modest improvements to the cottage without the requested variance relief. Unlike the Otano case where the previously existing cottage had been removed, the subject application is similar to the Mullman case (ZBA action #6622) which retains the existin structure and modifies it to bring the ceiling height into compliance. _ (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: The footprint expansion of 5.8 SF for the hot water heater is minimal. The structural footprint will remain unchanged. The other structural alterations include the in-place raising of the cottage to replace the deteriorating locust footings and loose concrete block footings and the an increase in ceiling and roof height to create reasonable headroom inside the cottaae. (4) The variance wilt NOT have an adverse eRect or Impact on the physical or environmental condRions in the neighborhood or disMcf because: Due to the insulated location of the property a variance relief in this community would not have an impact on the physical or environmental conditions. The existing footprint will basically remain the same, it expands only minimally to house the water heater, and the location of the cottage with respect To wetlands will remain unchanged. (5) Has the alleged difficulty been seM-created? (X) Yes, or ( ) No. Does this variance invoke as-bufR conshuction or activity? ( )Yes, or (X) No. The need for relief is created by the fact that the z ng code now prohibits activities which at one lime were not prohibited. i APPLICANT'S PROJECT D>;SCRIPTIO>\ ' v~Pl u~ : ~ u:~ rr r!zn~:.urt,. A~~L l. For llemolition u1' ISzisting Building Areas Please describe areas being removed:___~~~_ H. New Construction Areas (New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): r n 3-G~k3'Y7y t~(E'l.L~ Dimensions of first floor extension: 2-y- h ~p~Cl" ~ilQQ~f~' -fJkFc (e~-d J/RLY.'!lt~U4 Dimensions of new second floor: Dimensions of floor above second level: /t/ ~ Height (from finished ground to top of ridge): 6'U ~Z-~ Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed? If yes, please provide height (above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: NQ HI. Proposed Construction Description (Alterations or Structural Changes) (Attach extra sheet if necessary). Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: Gt'C/E - 5'Tfie4~ SEA.S~iVl~~ C077~~6~ ?~~lm:bel' Of FI~OrS a:;d C!:anges `h~ITH A!teraticns: [7.C.TE- ~~~Y LCJE1?SdJ~L. C©Z~A'f~ R.zi / 77J O .U ~ .t..~ S P02 Co T~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~>v~~ =~Y S f9 ~F ,Fi92 limit-}'~tZ f-~~r a IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage (from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: Proposed increase of building coverage: C.A Sf3 SF' Square footage of yow' lot: CA ~ 2 Q~'RES Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: tih V. Purpose of New Construction: ~~C®N.STQLJCt ~~PSTYtLJlo ~~r-i.~'Ib~p ~DC~w'JDATIO~1 ,e.~3/SE-T~ Gam! J.VL~ 7-" TfEE' CfJTAG-~ i3~/ G:~ 'T<3 .G'E/~C/G~la-CpLi~7.tJG~ 4777~- .v4~S eEStL~~~% ~r~c~r.v~ loP~' VI. Please describe the land contours (flat, slope heavily wooded, marsh area, etc.) on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement (s): 77f~ G~}4JD Et'E}S Y-~D~EST .~D~'~ /.V 5~ tJ1~170ty,° 1~ .y 5 ~ ~ Uti,~?Cr.~~ 70 7~E ~~`PJ.~-.21G~ ~f.~t[>F~z' Please submit 8 sets of photos, labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction, and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 4/2012 FOIL Fli_IAG ~A Il~fl 1 OI IL Lli:A .-11'1'1.1(,VIIU~ A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? Yes ~ No B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contows? _~No Yes please explain on attached sheet. C. 1.) Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? 2.) Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application? Y~~j 3.) Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? Y~.~ 4.) If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? IV O Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees: and if issued, please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. D. ]s there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? rCJQ E. Are there any patios, concreie barriers. bulkheads ur fences thai exist that are not shown on The survey that you are submitting? l(./~ Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above line. F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe: G. Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If any are lacking, please apply to the Building Department to either obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel?~ If yes, please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. I. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel Q~,IE-STI~y <~.gyj,~.rGV ~~'t!'L,/-Fand the proposed use AL/ - W l'L6~1 GGZ~f1G~ ~L?lSN7 C.LCI C L' ~blU (ex existing single family, proposed. same with gara ,pool or other) ~~(J F(~Z.>?l.~D~l~N 4-3U-~3 Authorize signature and Date BOARD MEMBERS dF $f?(/T Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson ~a HD 53095 Main Road • P.U. Box 1179 ~D Southold,NY 1 1 97 1-0959 James Dinizio, Jr. ~ 7~t Off~e Location: Gerard P Goehringer G ~ Town Annex /First Floor, Capital One Bank George Homing ~ ~ ~ 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Ken Schneider ~C~~~ Southold, NY 11971 hnp://sou[holdtown.northfork. net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD R ! E Tel. (63]) 765-1809 • Fax (631) 765.9064 °I' ~ ~ 1W Z ~ FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION ~+Old TOwn lark MEETING OF NLY 19, 2012 ZBA FILE: 6525 NAME OF APPLICANT: Breezy Shores Community, Inc. (Hernan Otano, Cottage #5) PROPERTY LOCATION: 65490 Main Road (aka Sage Blvd.) Greenport, NY SCTM#1000-53-5-12.6 SEORA DETERMINATION; The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated November 17, 2011 stating that [t»s application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated November 29, 2011. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this departrnent, as well as the records available to us, it is our determination that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: Subject parcel is located in the R-80 zone and contains 82.6 acres. It is improved with three dwellings, a brick building, two garages, 28 seasonal cottages and 20 sheds. The Breery Shores community is a unique property deeply rooted in the history of the Town. The access to the property is via a private road (Sage Boulevard) and the property is adjacent on the south to Shelter Island Sound, as shown on the survey dated January 25, 2011. The multiple conages on the property are apre-existing non-conforming use that was established prior to zoning by the Sage family in the early 1900s. The cottages housed employees of the Sage family brick factory and have been rented as seasonal cottages. In 2000, a real estate cooperative, Breery Shores Community Inc., was established by the community and shares were offered as an ownership interest in the cooperative. The cottage at issue in this application is known as Cottage no. 5 and is owned by Hernan Otano. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article XXIII Code Sectio? Z80-123, Article XXiI Section 280-1 ib and the Building Inspector's October 14, 2011, emended October 18, 2011, amended to clarify description of structure dated December 8, 2011, Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit for demolition and construction of a cottage at; 1) a nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged, reconstructed, structurally altered or moved, unless such building is changed to a conforming use, existing cottage is a nonconforming building with a nonconforming use 2) less than the code required bulkhead setback of 75 feet. . Pagc2of3-July 19,2012 ZBA Filep645 - Otano Crr?1 1000-53-5-12.6 RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variances tv reconstruct a cottage that was demolished and "as built" construction with x nonconforming use where the code permits no enlargement, reconstruction or alterations unless the building is changed to a conforming use, and a bulkhead setback of 50 feet where the code requires 75 feet. AMENDED APPLICATION: During the hearing, the applicant was asked to separate the two variance requests: I) the nonconformity to be considered under the use variance standards; and 2) the bulkhead setback under the area variance standards. The use variance application was reviewed under Zoning Board file #6557. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The applicant was given a building permit to lift the cottage off the foundation and replace the foundation to conform with FEMA requirements. The applicant demolished the cottage without benefit of a building permit. The cottage is part of an incorporated community. In 1985, a prior owner applied to the Zoning Board of Appeals under file #3320 for permission fora 19 lot subdivision of this property; the request was denied. In 1994, the original owner applied to this Board for permission to continue a discontinued use of renting the cottages, the application was deemed inactive and closed since the applicant never provided the additional requested documents. It is also noted that this property does not have 280A approval. FINDINGS OF FACT/ REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on December 1, 201 1, January 5, 2012, March I, 2012 and June 7, 2012 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law 6267-b(31(b)(11. Grant of the variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby properties. This unique property represents its own neighborhood of 82.6 acres with substantial wetlands and is far removed from adjacent properties. Thus, no adjacent property owner will be adversely impacted by the proposal. These 28 seasonal cottages on the subject property have been in existence since the early ] 900's when they were built for occupancy by workers in the Sage brick factory. In the 1940's, when operation of the brick factory slowed, cottages were rented to summer guests. Each of the adjacent waterfront units are similarly located from [he bulkhead and are of similar size. 2. Town Law 8267-b(31(bl(21. The benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant [o pursue, other than an area variance, While this Board recognizes the existing proprietary lease on the property that limits the applicant with respect to where he can build a replacement cottage structure, given the ample size of the property, it is feasible for the applicant to construct this structure in a conforming location. !t is noted that the proprietary lease is a document that can be changed based upon the needs of the community and its owners. Additionally, the proprietary lease cannot take precedent over the Town Zoning Code. 3. Town Law 8267-b(31(b)(31. The variance granted herein is mathematically substantial, representing 33% relief from the code. However, in the context of the entire community the variance is not substantial. The non- conforming cottage units have existed in the current location since the ]940's, with each cottage unit in a similar location. The location and size of the proposed structure shall remain the same. 4. Town Law 8267-6f3)(b)(4) A variance in this residential community will not have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant has stated that it is not feasible to relocate the cottage due to the extent of the Flood zone this parcel is located in. Additionally, the changes made to the foundation have made the structure compliant with FEMA. Finally, the applicant shall be required to conform to the requirements of Chapter 236 of the code regarding storm water runoff. 5 Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(51 The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the - Pagc 3o(3-]u1y 19, 201? ZllA FiICN65?5 - Otano CTM I WO-53-5-12.6 (imitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. Additionally, the applicant proceeded with ademolition/construction of this stnreture without the benefit of a building permit. 6. Town Law &267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a new seasonal cottage unit while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Weisman (Chairperson}, seconded by Member Goehringer, and duly carried, to GRAINY the variance as applied for, and shown on the architectural drawings labeled site plan, floor plan, and east, west, waterside and entry side elevations, prepared by Fairweather Design Associates dated 11/10/2011 and stamped received by the Board of Appeals on November ] 0, 201 1. CONDITIONS: ] . The structure shall be used only as an unheated seasonal cottage No future alterations/renovation or additions on the subject cottage may take place without review by the ZBA, other than necessary minor repairs, as determined by the Building Department. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in thr's decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board ojAppeals. Any deviation from the variance(s) graraed herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconjormities under the zoning code. This action does nor authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature ojlhe subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the nght to substitute a similar design the[ is de minimis in nature jot an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconJorrniry. Vote oJthe Board Ayer Members Weisman (Chairperson), Goehringer, Schneider, Horning. A'u3`- Mepaher Dinizio. This Resolution was duly adopted (4-/). I// ~ c Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing r/ /~3 /2012 BOARD MEMBERS of SOOT Southo]d Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson yy,~ y~ 53095 Main Road • Y.O. Box 1179 ~O Southoid,NY11971-0959 Office Location: Gerard P. Goehringer G C Town Annex /First Floor, Capital One Barilc George Homing ~ y~~ 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Ken Schneider l,J'~O~ Southold, NY 11971 http://southol drown .northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS E EIVED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ~ I o ' ~ Tel. (631) 765-1809 • Fax (631} 765-9064 M fl (/(7 2013 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION u ho To- er MEETING OF FEBRUARY 2g, 2013 ZBA FILE: 6622 NAME OF APPLICANT: Breezy Shores Community, Inc. (Naomi Mullman) SCTM#1000-53-OS-12.6 PROPERTY LOCATION: 65490 Main Rd, Cottage # 11, (adj. to Shelter Island Sound) Greenport, NY SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type ]i category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A ]4-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated January 8, 2013 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide orinter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated January 8, 2013. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is EXEMPT from Coastal Consistency Review. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION Subjectparcel is located in the R-80 zone and contains 82.6 acres. It is improved with three dwellings, a brick building, two garages, 28 seasonal cottages and 20 sheds. The Breezy Shores community is a unique property deeply rooted in the history of the Town. The access to the property is via a private road (Sage Boulevard) and the property is adjacent on the south to Shelter Island Sound. The multiple cottages on the property are apre-existing non-conforming use that was established prior to zoning by the Sage family in the early 1900s. The cottages housed employees of the Sage family brick factory and have been rented as seasonal cottages. In 2000, a real estate cooperative, Breezy Shores Community, lnc., was established by the community and shares were offered as an ownership interest in the Cooperative. The cottage at issue in this application is known as Cottage no. 11 and is owned by Naomi Mullman. All as shown on the survey prepared by Howard Young, L.S., entitled Survey for Naomi Mullman, Cottage 11, Breezy Shores, dated July 6, 2012, revised Aug. I , 201 Z for General Amendments, Sheets 1 of 2, and 2 of 2, BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article XXIII Code Section 280-123, Article XXI[ Section 280-1 16 (B) and the Building Inspector's October 22, 2012 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit for additions and alterations to a seasonal cottage at; I) a nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged, reconstructed, structurally altered or moved, unless such building is changed to a conforming use, 2) less than the code required bulkhead setback of 75 feet, located at: #11 Breezy Shores Community, Inc., 65490 Main Road (aka State Route 25) aka Sage Blvd. {adj. to Shelter Island Sound) Greenport, NY. • Pege ? of 3 -February 28, 2017 ZBA PilegGG22 -Breezy Shores Comm., Inc. (Mullman) CTM. 1000-53-5-12.G (corsage Wl q RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variances to construct an addition and alterations to a seasonal cottage with a nonconforming use where the code permits no enlargement, reconstruction or alterations unless the building is changed to a conforming use, and a bulkhead setback of 54.5 feet (as shown on the survey) where the code requires a minimum of 75 feet. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The Board received a letter dated February 1, 2013 from the President of the Breezy Shores Community Corporation indicating approval of the applicant's plans. FINDINGS OF FACT/ REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on February 7, 2013 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law &267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood nor a detriment to nearby properties. This unique property represents its own neighborhood of 82.6 acres with substantial wetlands and is far removed from adjacent properties. Thus, no adjacent property owner will be adversely impacted by the proposal. These 28 seasonal cottages on the subject property have been in existence since the early 1900's when they were built for occupancy by workers in the Sage brick factory. In the1940's, when operation of the brick factory slowed cottages were rented to summer guests. Each of the adjacent waterfront units are similarly located from the bulkhead and are of similar size. 2. Town Law 6267-b(3)(b)(21. The benefit sought by [he applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant [o pursue, other than area variances. The existing seasonal cottage is apre-existing non- conforming building with apre-existing non-conforming use with apre-existing non-conforming bulkhead setback of 54.5 feet. Therefore, any proposed additions and alterations will require relief from the code. 3. Town Law 6267-b(3)(b)(3). The variances granted herein are mathematically substantial. Section 280-123 prohibits the enlargement ofnon-conforming buildings with non-conforming uses. However, the proposed addition of 20.6 square feet to the existing bathroom is 3.1% of the pre-existing cottage foot print which the Board deems to be de minimus in nature and necessary to bring the existing bathroom up to code with a minimum square footage that is functionally practical. All other proposed alterations will be constructed in place and in kind. The variance granted herein for relief from Section 280-116(B) is mathematically substantial, representing 27% relief from the code. However, in the context of the entire community, the variance is not substantial. The nonconforming cottages have existed in their current locations since the 1940's with each waterfront cottage unit having a similar non-conforming bulkhead setback. The location of the proposed structure shall remain the same. 4. Town Law 6267-b(3)(b)(4) No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code. 5. Town Law 6267-b(3)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. However, to the extent that a structure ultimately and unavoidably requires some reconstruction and/or alterations to allow for reasonable improvements to continue the safe use of the structure, the need for variance relief is not self-created but created by the zoning code that now prohibits activities which at one time were not prohibited. 6. Town Law 6267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessar}' and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of additions and alterations to the seasonal cottage., while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safeTy and welfare of the community. Page 3 of 3 -February 28, 201J 28A Fileg6G22 - 8rcery Shores Comm., Inc (Muliman) CTM'. 1000-53-5-12.6 (coaage q I I RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: [n considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Lavr 267-B, motion was offered by Member Schneider, seconded by Member Goehringer, and duly carried, to GRANT, the variances as applied for, and shown on the survey prepared by Howard Young, L.S., entitled Survey for Naomi Mullman, Cottage 1 1, Breezy Shores, dated July 6, 2012, revised Aug. 1, 2012 for General Amendments, Sheets 1 of 2, and 2 of 2. And the architectural drawings prepared by David Mullman, R.A., as follows: Sheets A-I and A-Z dated 8/13/12 last revised 11/i2/2012 titled "Site Plan for Proposed Renovation", and "Photo of Existing Cottage", sheet DG-100.00 dated 10/16/12 last revised 10/25/12, sheets A-] Ol, A-102, A-103 all dated 10/19/12 and last revised 10/25/12 CONDITIONS: 1. The structure shall be used only as an unheated seasonal cottage. 2. No future alterations or additions on the subject cottage may take place without review by the ZBA, other than necessary minor repairs as determined by the Building Department. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. Any deviation from the survey, sire plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a passible denial by the Building Department of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance(s) granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconfarmities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any Curren! or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right ro substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. G'ole of the Board: .oyes: Members: Weisman (Chairperson.) Harping, Go¢hringer, Schneider. This Resolution was duly adopted (4-O). . N ~l-f.U-c Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing ~ /2013 BOARD MEMBERS ~~F $!)Vl Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson y~ 6'p 53095 Main Road • P.O. Box 1179 ,`O !O Southold,NY 1197]-0959 James Dinizio, ]r. ~ ~t Office Location: Gerard P. Gcehringer Q Town Annex /First Floor, Capital One Bank George Homing ~ ~ ~ 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Ken Schneider l'r~~ ~t. Southold, NY 11971 http:/lsouthol dtown. north fork. net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ECEIVED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 'f ~ O I Tel. (631) 765-1809 • Fax (631) 765-9064 ~ 2 ~ FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION So • old Town Clerk MEETING OF JULY 19, 2012 ZBA FILE : #6557 NAME OF APPLICANT: Breezy Shores Community, Inc. (Herman Otano, Cottage #5) PROPERTY LOCATION: 65490 Main Road (aka Sage Blvd.) Greenport, NY SCTM # 1000-53-5-12.6 SEORA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type 11 category of the State's List of Actions, without further Steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated November 17, 201 1 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued his recommendation dated November 29, 201 I. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: Subject parcel is located in the R-80 zone and contains 82.6 acres. It is improved with three dwellings, a brick building, two garages, 28 seasonal cottages and 20 sheds. The Breezy Shores community is a unique property deeply rooted in the history of the Town. The access to the property is via a private road (Sage Boulevard) and the property is adjacent on the south to Shelter Island Sound, as shown on the survey dated January 25, 201 I. The multiple cottages on the property are apre-existing non-conforming use that was established prior [o zoning by the Sage family in the early 1900s. The cottages housed employees of the Sage family brick factory and have been rented as seasonal cottages. In 2000, a real estate cooperative, Breezy Shares Community Inc., was established by the community and shares were offered as an ownership interest in the cooperative. The cottage at issue in this application is known as Cottage no. 5 and is owned by Heman Otano. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Use Variance under section §280-13 (A) (I) which permits single family detached dwellings, not to exceed one dwelling per lot and from Article XXI?1 Town Code §280-123 and the Building Inspector's December 12, 201 I Notice of Disapproval, updated March 6, 2012 based on an application for building permit for demolition and construction of a cottage as; 1) a nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged, reconstructed, structurally altered or moved unless such building is changed to a conforming use RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests a use variance to permit the demolition and reconstruction of an 807 sq. ft. seasonal cottage. The total 807 square feet includes the habitable space and non-habitable porch, but not Page 2 of 6 -July 19,1012 ZBA FiICp6657 - Otano CTM- 1000-53-5-12.6 the stairs and landing. The need for a use variance is caused by the request to establish an additional use (non- conforming cottage) on a subject property that already has a principal use (dwelling). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The applicant originally applied to the ZBA solely for an area variance for the setback of the cottage to the bulkhead. The bulkhead variance is addressed in ZBA decision k6525. During the initial public hearing on this matter, when questioned on whether the demolition of the structure would cause the structure to lose its pre-existing nonconforming status, the applicant's response was that the structure was not being demolished and that, even it if were, that the structure could be permitted under §280-122. After receiving significant testimony from the applicant's representatives and the Town Building Department, the Board requested [hat the applicant submit an application for a use variance. As such, the Board will address below the issue of whether the structure was demolished; whether this structure constitutes a nonconforming building with a nonconforming use; whether §280-122 permits the demolition and reconstruction of apre-existing nonconforming structure; and whether the applicant is entitled to a use variance. FINDINGS OF FACT/ REASONS FOR BOARD ACTON: The Zoning Board of Appeals held public hearings on this application on December 1, 2011, January 5, 2012, Mazch I, 2012 and June 7, 2012, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentatan, personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: I. Demolition Based upon the Notice of Disapproval issued by the Building Department on December 8, 201 I and updated on March 6, 2012, the proposed action included the demolition and construction of a cottage. It is important to point out that the Notice of Disapproval was issued after a stop work order had been issued on the property and prior to the work being completed on the structure. The applicant presented the following testimony/evidence to illustrate that the proposed construction did not constitute a complete demolition of the structure: I . A floor plan with its original application dated l I/10/2011 indicating "rebuilt existing walls" and "new walls" 2. A memorandum, received on December 28, 2011 that included a listing of items that remained in the structure and items that were re-built 3. A letter from an Architect, Robert I. Brown dated December 13, 2011 stating that "less than SO% of the structure had been demolished" At the public hearing on March 1, 2012, the Board addressed each item presented by the applicant. The Board noted that the floor plan submitted dated 11/10/2011 indicated that every single external and internal wall of the structure was either being rebuilt or was new. (March 1, 2012 Transcript, pg. 6 lines 15-25). Additionally, the Board members and representatives from the Building Department noted that based upon the physical inspection and their experience, it appeared that the applicant took the structure apart piece by piece and reconstructed a major portion of the structure. Both the memorandum and letter from Mr. Brown attested to the work that had been performed up to and until December 10, 2011 when the stop work order was issued, but did not account for the additional work that would be required to complete the construction on the structure. Additionally, Mr. Brown's letter did not contain the mathematical support for the calculation, nor did he provide such calculations at or after the public hearing as requested. As such, the statements made therein are simply conclusory with no basis in fact before the Board. On the other hand, and based upon the physical inspection of the structure the Board notes the following items: 1. Anew foundation was installed; 2. New plywood siding was installed; Page 3 of 6 -July 19, 2012 ZBA Fd<gfi557 - Grano CTM~1000-5]-5-12.fi 3. Newjois[s were installed; 4. New strapping was installed; 5. Anew plate was installed; 6. New plumbing is required; 7. New electric is required; 8. Every window was replaced; 9. Entire porch was replaced; 10. Each wall was replaced; 1 1. The roof would be replaced; 12. One third of the floor system was replaced. As stated by the Chief Building Inspector at the March 1, 2012 hearing (transcript p. 24, line 25, p. 25 line 1) "[i]f you have four walls and you take four walls down it's a demolition." ]t is obvious that this structure was taken apart and demolished, piece by piece, and replaced with an entirely new structure. As such, this Board finds that the amount of demolition and reconstruction that took place and will take place to complete this structure amounts to a full demolition and the loss of any pre-existing nonconforming status that this building maintained prior to the commencement of any construction. Il. Nonconforming_Status of the Structure and Interpretation of §280-122 A. Nonconforming Status of the Structure As set forth above, the December 12, 201 I Notice of Disapproval (updated March 6, 2012) identified this structure as a nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use. Pursuant to §280-123 of the Town Zoning Code: A nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged, reconstructed or structurally altered or moved, except as set forth below, unless the use of such building is changed to a conforming use At the January 5, 2012 pubic hearing, when asked to explain the language of the Notice of Disapproval, the Building Department Permits Examiner, Patricia Conklin, testified: "I looked at the paperwork. Saw pictures from the Trustees and determined with the site review, determined that it was a nonconforming building. No. 1 because it is a seasonal cottage and its less than 850 square feet. Therefore it fits the category of a nonconforming building- The second pert of that nonconforming use is, it's the second structure as a principal building which is on that property. (January 5, 2012 transcript, p 88 lines 11-20) We have a second structure after the principal one and have one lot. And then there aze subsequent structures, they are not permitted as of right. So that is why it would be sent to you as a nonconforming use. And then in addition, this is a nonconforming building because it's less than 850 square feet, as defined in the Southold [Town CodeJ." (January S, 2012 transcript, p. 89 lines 3-12) The applicant presented testimony and case law to this Board to support the argument that the cottage was a nonconforming building with a conforming use that should be considered under §280-122. More specifically, the applicant cited Matter of Dawson v. Zoning Board ojAppeals of the Town ojSouthold, 12 A.D.3d 444, 785 N.Y.S.2d 64 (2nd Dept. 2004) as legal precedent for the principle that the cottage was a residential use. In Mutter ojDawson the Court considered whether a single accessory cottage to a single principle dwelling was a nonconforming building with a conforming use rather than a nonconforming building with a nonconforming use. The analysis was important in that instance to confirm whether the ZBA properly focused upon whether the use had been abandoned for two years under §280-121 which governs nonconforming uses. The Court concluded Page 4 of 6 -July 19, 2012 28A Fi1tk6557 - Otano CTM: 1000-53-5-12.6 [hat the cottage was accessory to the principal dwelling and therefore a nonconforming building with a conforming use. As such, the abandonment provisions of the Town code were not applicable and area variances should have been granted. The facts at issue in this instance are clearly distinguishable from [he circumstances present in Dawson. Here, the ZBA is not simply dealing with a single family dwelling and a single accessory cottage. While the Court considered the cottage an established accessory use to a principal dwelling, having 28 cottages as an accessory to a residential use is simply not supported by Dawson. Pursuant to §280-13(Ax 1) each lot in the R-80 zone is allowed to have aone-family detached dwelling, not to exceed one dwelling per lot. The intent of the this section is clearly to limit the number of dwellings and residential uses on a single lot and to reinforce the subdivision regulations set forth in Chapter 240 of the Southold Town Code. This property contains three dwellings and 28 seasonal cottages on a single lot. This is further complicated by the fact that this "cottage" does not meet the definition of a dwelling under §280-4, that "cottages" are not addressed as a permissible use anywhere within the Town Code and the Town does not permit cottages as an accessory to a principle dwelling. As such, this cottage is treated as a nonconforming building with a nonconforming use that requires a use variance. B. Interpretation of §280-122 While it is noted that the ZBA does not have to proceed with this issue because it has determined that a use variance is required, the ZBA will issue a determination on whether §280-122 permits an applicant to demolish and reconstruct a structure, in place and in kind, without the need for further variances, as argued by the applicant. Section 280-122 (A) states: Nothing in this article shall be deemed to prevent the remodeling, reconstruction or enlargement of a nonconforming building containing a conforming use, provided that such action does not create any new nonconformance or increase the degree of nonconformance with regard to the regulations pertaining to such buildings. Throughout this proceeding, the applicant has argued that, pursuant [o §280-] 22(A), he was permitted to demolish and reconstruct this structure in place and in kind, in its entirety, without the need for any additional variances. At the public hearing, the ZBA and Building Department provided the applicant with a copy of a memorandum of the ZBA to the Building Department from 2002. (March 1, 2012 Transcript, pp 16-21). This memorandum set forth types of "reconstruction" that would not trigger the need for additional variances. Such activities include, but are not limited to: replacement of windows, raising ceiling height without increasing the degree of nonconformity; repair or replacement, in place and in kind, of siding or roofing; or replacement or repair of existing decks, porches or roofs as long as there are no new extension or extensive modifications which increase the degree of nonconformity. From the listing in this memo, it is clear that the ZBA has interpreted §280-122 to allow a property owner to make minor repairs and for minor reconstruction. As such, the term "reconstruction" as used in §280-122(A) does not permit the demolition of an entire structure and replacement in kind without obtaining all required variances. II Use Variance Application: I . Town Law &267-b(21(b)(11. The applicant cannot realize a reasonable return for each and every permitted use under the zoning regulations for the particulaz district where the property is located, demonstrated by competent financial evidence. The applicant provided ample evidence that it is not able [o realize a reasonable return from the property without the ability to reconstruct the cottage. The applicant's form of ownership interest in the property is a severely limiting factor. The Applicant retains a share in a cooperative that is governed through a proprietary lease, which permits residential uses only on the property. Any other use permitted under the Town Code is virtually impossible on this property given the cooperative ownership. if not permitted to rewnstruct the structure in place and in kind, the applicant's ownership interest has no value and is rendered useless. The applicant Page S of 6 -July 19, 2012 ZBA Fi1c176557 - Olano CI'M: 1000-53-5-12.6 submitted an affidavit regarding the value of the shares in the cooperative, as well as information about comparable sales in the area of the property, as well as information regarding the maintenance and carrying chazges on the property. In light of these circumstances, the Board finds that the applicant cannot realize a reasonable return on his property interest. 2. Town Law &267-b(2)(bl(2). The hardship is unique to the property and it does not apply to a substantial portion of the district or neighborhood. As set forth above, this property is unique given its historic context and the pre- exiting nonconforming nature of the entire community. It is one of a limited number of properties in Southold Town that retain multiple seasonal cottage uses and the only property of this size. The grant of a use variance here will not create a precedent that would apply to other lots in the community and the decision will apply only to this property. 3. Town Law &267-b(2)(bl(31. The requested use variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. With respect to preserving the character of the neighborhood, it is noted that this parcel is a sepazate enclave that is sectioned off from the surrounding community. It is an 82 acre parcel, with access via a gated private road. Only those persons who live within Breery Shores have access thereto. The community is seasonal and the residents utilize the structures primarily from April through October. The seasonal structures are strategically located to take advantage of the water views. Additionally, the location of the reconstructed structure is appropriate within the context of this neighborhood, as the adjacent structures are similarly situated, the location of the structure is where it was originally and the size of the structure will remain unchanged. 4. Town Law $267-b(21(bN4) The alleged hardship has not been self-created. The applicant purchased his interest in the Breery Shores community and the subject seasonal cottage in 2002. This structure had been in existence for many years and the Breezy Shores community required that the applicant make certain repairs to update the structure, which started with replacing the foundation. Upon raising the house, the applicant discovered that the condition of the structure was significantly worse than expected and that major reconstruction was necessary to make it safe and habitable. 5. Town Lsw &267-b. Gran[ of this use variance is the minimum action necessary and adequate to address the unnecessary hardship proven by the applicant, and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Weisman (Chairperson), seconded by Member Goehringer, and duly carried, to GRANT, the use variance as applied for, subject [o the following conditions: CONDITIONS: 1. The swcture shall be used only as an unheated seasonal cottage. 2. No future alterations/renovation or additions on the subject cottage may take place without review by the ZBA, other than necessary minor repairs, as determined by the Building Department. The! the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Department oja building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variance(s) granted herein as shown on (he architecture! drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconjormities under the zoning code. This action does naf authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature ojthe subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Pagc 60(6-July 19,2012 ZBA File?I6557 - Otano CTM. 1000-53-5-12.6 The Board reserves (he right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in wture for an a!(eration (ha( does not increase the degree of nonconformity. !'ote of the Board: Ayes: Members Weisman (Chairperson), Gcehringer, Schneider, Horning ,Nuy~M14j/e/'m'~Jber Dinl/i~zi?o.~This R(l/e/_sj~o~'lu(ion was duly adopteA(4-l J. Leslie Kanes Weisman Chairperson Approved for filing ~ /~cf- /2012 617.20 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I -PROJECT INFORMATION To be coin leted b A licant or Pro'ect S onsor 1. AP~C~ANT~Pijd$OQR~~~CO ~6~~rj~ 2. PROJECT NAME 3. P/PROJECT LOCATION. G.• n ~ ! ~ Municipality X/ County V (~~j~G~(~- 4. PRECISE LOCATION (SUeet address and road intersections, rominent landmarks, etc., or provide map) corr~s~ ~2S', X54- Ja ~br~r~ 25', ~~'V~~2T, "TOGDR> O~ v`OU~f~t~LlJ s~~-~c ~ iaoo - - .5 - i2~ 5. PROPOSED ACTION IS: New ~ Expansion Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Q~PyTc~G ~Ig t~~}dlC..~ ti~Z}~~. J ~dD~~d.b.S~ ,t2.~« G~t~A6E cA~. z FAT Ta r,~r peOV'~ ~iu.vv ~G~?°' ~3Z'~~t.Jb ~ 7S~` ~ X002 '77~ iN~n~ 7. AMOUNT OF ND AFFECTED: r~ Initially _ acres ultimately B6• Z acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER. EXISTING LAND USE R.ESTRIGTIONS? Yes No If No, describe briefly 9. WHAT iS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? ~Residentiai ~ Industrial ~ Commercial ~ Agriculture ~ Park/ForesUOpen Space ~ Other Describe. 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? ® Yes ~ No If Yes, list agency(s) name and penniVapprovals: -7a~r7A; ~ .SBVd~fY7L~ ~~R~ 7lzU5t~CZ - ~c 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? Yes ~NO If Yes, list agency(s) name and permiVapprovals: 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? Yes No 1 TIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOV'E/IS TRU/E~TfO,THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ApplicanUSponso ~n /LJ~ (ij~ - ~ /-~~T L ! H Date: t~ - 3y - fJ Sgnature: If t e action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER t ,7~~„ ;~=°K< _ PART 11 • IMPACT ASSESSMENT To be com leted b Lead A enc A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.4? If yes, coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. Yes ~ No fi CdILL AC Ili uE~:r"v~ .iOP, DI NS E ~ RE'dlEb: t.z oRGVI;iEJ rOR UN'JS I EG FCIIC~h~ 1 c. d!;. F,F.. r „k; ia- ~ ~ negalwr d eclsration ma} be superseded by anolhm involved agency Yes ~ No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, illegible) Ci. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic pattern, solitl waste production or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wiltllife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangeretl species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopte4 or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain briefly: C5. Growth, subsequent tlevelopment, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly: C6. Long term, short term, wmulative, or other effects not identified in C1-C5? Explain briefly: C7. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly: D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREA (CEAj? Yes ~ No If Yes, explain briefly: E. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? Yes ~ No If Yes, explain briefly: PART III -DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect shouldbe assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of ocwrrtng; (c) duration, (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. Ii necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. Ii question D of Part II was checked yes, the determination of significance must evaluate the potential impact of the proposed action on the environmental characteristics of the CEA. Check this boz if you have identified one or more potentially large orsignificant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FUL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. Check this box ifyou havedetermined, basetl on the information and analysis above and anysupporting documentation, that the proposed action WlL NOT result in any significant atlverse environmental impacts AND provide, on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name o Responsible cer in Lead Agency ige o Responsible Officer gnalure of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Ignalure of Preparer (1 different from responsible officer) 1GRI<I"I.l"l 12,V. D,~ f:1 ti~l.-~1hA11:1' 1 'T'OWN OF SOUTHOLll WHEN TO USE THIS FORM: This farm Hurst be comp[eled by the applicnrrt jar any special use permit, site plan approval, use vnrinnc•e, area variance or subrlivisiorr rrpprovnl on property within nn ngriculturnl rlistricl OR within SOOjeet ojn farm operation locnterl in an ugriculhrra! district. All applications requiring un ngricuUural data statement must be referred ro the Sujjolk County Department ojPlanning in accordance wi!/r Section 239m and 139n of [he Genera! Municipal Law. 1. Name of Applicant: rL!/22Aff f 2. Address of Applicant: 2.?1P C 21,r~`' 6T.S~j' ~{/Y ,LIY /Op0 3. Name of Land Owner (if other than Applicant):~e~~rl ~ ~ S Gl7Xt'sG! ~~G 4. Address of Land Owner: /aQ8 Cj2S~ .yIATI'!T L/~ .UY 5. Description of Proposed Project: ~~f G - AG~A eV .Q / Z ! - CA 2-O 7'tJl~'lP20L/G Chi l r7.Ut7 ~S 6. Location of Property: (road and Tax map number) RT ~ - ,v sc -53-'S-/2.1Q 7. Is the parcel within 500 feet of a farm operation? Yes No 8. Is this parcel actively farmed? { }Yes ~c{ No 9. Name and addresses of any owner(s) of land within the agricultural district containing active fatm operations. Suffolk County Tax Lo[ numbers will be provided to you by the Zoning Board Staff, it is your responsibility to obtain [he current names and mailing addresses from the Town Assessor's Office (765-197) or fi~cm the Real Property Tax CJffce located in Riverhead. NAl\9E and ADDRESS I. sG7~t # 5'2 - ,5 - S 7 ! p G-'f-fP15~Y~+U Q~ ~aQ 7.26 z vC 9'LJG~ ~CJ~i' ILGl~/ s. a. S 6. (Please use the back of this page if [here are additional property owners) -4 / 30 /2Di3 Signatu of Applicant Dale Note: 1. The local Board will solicit comments from the owners of land identified above in order to consider the effect of the proposed action on their farm operation. Solicitations will be made by supplying a copy of this statement. 2. Comments returned to the local Board will be taken into consideration as part as the overall review of this application. 3.. Copies of the completed Agricultural Data Statement shall be sent by applicant ro the property owners identified - above. The cos[ for mailing shall be paid by the Applicant at the time the application is submitted for review. Board of Zonine Anneals Application AUTHORIZATION (Where Che Applicant is not the Owner) I, 1 ~Q l ~tZt~(-l residing at 'L~p ~ 2(/tG( ~T A{~' ~C (Print property owner's name (Mailing Address) NEI,y ~['~K + !yY IIJOD~do hereby authorize ~d/K L/!=L/_ClU1J~(-fG (Agent) ~ ~P~L-Y(7~C ( to apply for variance(s) on my behalffrom the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals. - G~~ ~ (Owner's Signature) i bo ~t~z;~.4N7' (Print Owner's Name) -11'1'1.1 C.-A1"I (>KVC12 ll2aAS-ACllOA,11. Ulti('LU?l lil_ fOIZV1 The "Down of Southold's Cude of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it [o take whatever action is necessary to av/oid same. YOUR NAME: /"!/~/~(-r}'~, (Last name, firs[ name, middle imnal, unless you are applying in the name of someone else nr other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all [hat apply) Taz grievance ~ Building Permit Variance Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other (activity) Planning Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. `Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5°/, of the shares. / YES NO Y if yon answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicant/agent/representative) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply) A) the owner of greater that 5 % of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation) _ B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in anon-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation) C) an officeq director, partner, or employee of the applicant', or D) the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this ~ day of~, 20 ~.3 Signature t Print Name 1 -d O ~1 Z f/ APPLICANT!AGENT/REPRESENT.niTIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of So!rrFOld's Cede of F-+lej~ moh~bits conflie+3 of ir~r~st on the earl of Ytwn effir~s aadmtolovees Th e~m~e of this farm is to rmmde inibrination whiefr me alert the town p fji~le ermflteh f ihr.er~e e.ul ilnur it m mn. va,wr..,"r ,.r:.,,.. y to avoid same. YOUR NAME: ~~~-d ~II~/j~ f3.S('L~ 1 (Coat name, Sint name,.griddle ~ 'tie!, unless you are applyingvi tiffie name of III someone trlx w other antlty, such es a ewrripeny. If so, indicaDq.tht.a9ha pwaon's w comp®y's omne.j j NAME OF APPLICATION: {Check ell that.apply.) Tax grievmux ~ Buikgag Variance TrusOae Qrange of Zone _ Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Morxing Exemption from plat w ofiiciat rrup Phoning ~ Othex (If °lhhef', natae tlce activity.) . Do you personatiy (w through yerrrc ewraprry, , slliling, parent, w child) have a relatia>,sbip with eay offioe w employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship includes by bloeid, rgarriage, w berscwas ihtteesL "Business interest ~ morns a busirwsx, including a partnership, in which the town erfl'icer w employee bns even a partial ownaship rd'(w employment by) a corporation . in which the town officer w employee owrts else than 596 the shares. _ YES NO Ifyeiu answered °YES", cempleee the batarce of this form mrel~date and sign where indiceud. - - Name of person empkryed by dce Town erf Southold T"nk or posiuorr of Net person Describe the rolatiorrslriP between yornself (the appliearrtlagemthepresentatlve)andthe town officer w evrpkryee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) aneVw destxibe in the space provided. - - Tice aowrr offier w anployee w his w hrx spouse, aiMerg, pares, oT edrild is (tfieck all ~ttiat apply)- . A) the owner of greener thm 596 ofthe shares of the corporate stock of tha sppficaat (when the applicant is a cerpmationr ' B) the legal w beneficial owner ofany inxrcst hr anon-oorponm entity (wh6n the- eppliesm is not a eorporation); _C) an officer, director, paroce[, w errrPloY'ce ofthe appficmK or - _D)the actual applicant. DESCRB'TION OF RELATIONSHIP snbn»tt~ _elay f ~ ~ 203 Signature PrintNatne tit~,tq Form TS 1 ~ E_\~I~'Itf I'It f(tip\l 1T!\lC lR.-A1~.-A("Il(1A,V. UI>C LU>l RI[ PUIL11 The Town o(Southold's Code of Ethics nrohibils conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and em nluyees. The Pu rposc of this Corm is to provide information which can alert the town of possible con Flicts ofinterest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to av/~oi//d same. ,y, ~'T~ r-,, YOUR NAME : l~l.~ D/~/(-FC. f Ir~i7 tL)~ (Last name, first name, middle initial, unl ss you are applying in the name of someone else or other en[iry~, such as a company. 11'so, indicate [he other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance ~ Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other (activity) Planning Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which [he town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation ig which the town officer m~ employee owns more than 5% of the shares. v/ YES NO If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that pm~son Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicanUagenUrepresentative) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply) A) Che owner of greater that 5 % of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation) B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in anon-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation) C) an officeq director, partneq or mnployee o(the applicant; or _ D) the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP r Submitted this 3~, a P/Z/L 20~ Signature Print Name ~li /J(C (~(t= Ll IU~~ BREEZY SHORES COMMUNITY, INC. P.O. BOX 925 MATTITUCK, NY 11952 PeconicpaintingObellsouth.net Apri126, 2013 I, Donald E. Wilson, President of Breezy Shores Community Inc. Coop Board, hereby affirm that the Board has reviewed the site plan and cottage for renovation of cottage number 25 for Ido Mizrahy, which was prepared by: Frank Uellendahl PO Box 316 Greenport, NY 11944 and have no objections thereto. Both the Board and the Architectual Committee at Breezy Shores certify that we have seen and approve of your plans. Donald E. Wilson fu~~u ufSuulhuld V1kl'(U'.~;~li l(1 V~~I~>lIF\I IUI(\I A. INS"fRUC'f1ONS I. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold aeencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastu( Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). 3. if any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. it shall not he undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Deparunent, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. R. D1;SCRIPTION OP SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION scTMa ll~l~a - 53 -~_~l~ ~2 , l~ /1JO tLtl2,~~f4% GoT(7-~-~'~25 The Application has been submitted to (check apprapriate response): Town Board ~ Planning Dept. ~ Building Dept. ~ Board of Trustees ~ ~,g~ 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: 2~Pc~c~ ~i~.v~~nU~/ ~~n ~i ~E GotyA~ G,~ 2 ~T-" ~ c ~ pPar/E ~iSTc.C,~ - ~ (540 ,~OcrTC 2~, Z3~Zc-~Z~' S~f~22~5 ~2 ~ ~c~~~ ~~~~~7- ~iic n.rra_~_ Present land use: ~~?.SDe~~L~~~ E /f,~~j~(~ Present zoning classification:__ ~-~j0 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: l~~ ~ %~n2~'~~('-,y,~~G--cam ~2CJ (b) Mailing address: ~,G(p E CL[~ ~ fyOt ~G , ~OUOy (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( ) ~i~J"C7p/ f~ - 7Q~li> (d) Application number, ifany: Will the action be directly undertaken. require fimdine. or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ~ No ? If yes, which state or federal agency? IJE"C ' DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Tr~~i~~ Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development Sce LWRP Section III -Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. Yes ? No ~ (Not Applicable -please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III -Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ? Yes ? No ®(Not Applicable -please explain) Police 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. Sec LWRP Section Ill -Policies Pages 6 through 7 for e~°aluation criteria Yes ~ No ~ (Not Applicable -please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section Ill -Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria Yes ~ No ~ (Not Applicable -please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. Sec LWRP Sectimi III -Policies Pages I6 through 2] for evaluation criteria Yes ~ No ~ (Not Applicable-pleaseeaplain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes ~ No~ (Not Applicable -please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section ?1 -Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evahtation criteria. See Section III -Policies Pages; 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes ~ No ~ (Not Applicable -please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessap~ Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. Sec LWRP Section 1[f -Policies; Pages 34 through 38 1'or evaluation criteria. n r--~ Yes U No (Not Applicable-please explain) PtiBLIC COAST POLICIIS Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Ye~ No~ (Not Applicable -please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Pulic~ 10. Protect Suuthuld's eater-depeudenl uses tool prumule siliu~~ of ne~~ ~~:uer-dependent uses in cuitahlr Incali~m~. tie, I.AAIZP Ccciiim III - Pnliric~: Pa~!c~ a- Ihru ~.rvh ~G li.;-c~;ilu;ilii n! i'rilcriu. l cs Au Y ;.~ul ~pplicaltlc- plca.c csplain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ? Yes ? No ~ Not Applicable -please explain Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 72. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Pages 62 through 6~ for evaluation criteria. Yes ~ No ~NOt Applicable-please explain Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Pages 6~ through 68 for evaluation criteria. ? Yes ? No~ Not Applicable -please explain is r -r ~ i i.4r ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ i - ~ r~ *,~+T,S„.~ - Y i. r.ty1~ 1- 1. r~~. i~'E'ti• j ~ ~ ~ 1- ~ ~ r ~ 1 f - - _ r ~ t ~ _ ; k, r` ' ~ r"~ ~ ~ - [,I V4 li+ ~ . 2IrL ~C°" ~ ~ C ~ fix- r?k~', i n t~ ~^~~+tiia a n~ 3' ~ s 4.. `fir ~i~ BREEZY SHORES -COTTAGE 25 -SOUTH ELEVATION - 03.28.13 ; .z ,4,. - 4- - ~ ~ . j - Y~Y `lea' y> M... r r Y.'.. . x . zG ~ ~ 5 c t .,t vk } py ~.c ~ k'y'?Fr i-...vfay.-S. ~1~.:~- }p "S'~y~~ qi~.~': BREEZY SHORES -COTTAGE 25 - SE VIEW - 03.28.13 ry _ _ r i _ 7. -M ~ ~ Mr ~i. w ' _rf ; ~ a a R ~ r ~.i''ns xp,; is ~ - sue. ~ ~ 4: I ~ ~ s`d-~ ~ gg 1: ~s~ ~j~i ~ _ ~ f ~ v~S: FY . Y;"_'~ BREEZY SHORES -COTTAGE 25 - NE VIEW - 03.28.13 ~ f , - - _ r 2~ _ _ N,~ir ,Af : 1^ h. F y ,i f S Eli ` ~ ~ ~ 6 d I p ~ x ~ ~z ~ ~ ~ktr e ~ j. -^t fi fi`~ a : 1 tJ~a. COTTAGE 25 -Bedroom 2 -exterior wall height: 5'-11" - 03/28/13 r~. r i~': s~ y,. ~~J ~~?r^ i a :e i. ::'T': w Sk sf i y~, ~ i ~1 'a k ~ s~~A t. _ ~ S~ _ A .x r `t _ S 7~~~7 _ a ! ~ i ~ . $ 4 G I1r '~.r i ~~'L 9-. - _ - is BREEZY SHORES -COTTAGE 25 INTERIOR VIEW EXPOSED RAFTERS AND COLLAR TIES TO REMAIN AS IS 06.12.12 t-~ - ^~n # ~ 1/(~ p ~ i ~ C a_~~ _ ~ ; . _ , ~ I~, ~ TOWN OF SOUTH LD PROPERTY RECORD CARD ~ OWNER STREET (D SL~-qQ VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT ~ ~b ~ ACR. „ REMARKS See a-E C. ,ec~ TYPE OF BLD. 1 ~ ~ 3 3 ~o 3 u ~ e ~ tip., ~ ~~j,~; br` PROP. CLASS -7 ~l,~r~?~i` ~ I~ ~ 1 2 0' 7 ~ J~Yi'~5 6 fr"1 e al~f ~C ~~~_,~~.c.~~) LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE O 7 IID ~ ~ ~ f,l ~ - ~111(a ~'oD3 iv i~-- ~3 1,.3 3s-9~9 . P~~ ~ FRONTAGE ON WATER HOUSE/LOT BULKHEAD TOTAL i .~Y \ t mom. a...:r~exswh ,.::.~:...`wgne-ssa~ansnm.~..~arnaasMSw~v..,aaw~e gyp.,. ~ ' TOWN OF SOUTHOL*D PROPERTY RECORD CARD C%~~ ?z~ 2 ~ i - ~ _ - - - tr~ ~l VILLAGE DIST SUB. LOT OWNER STREET f,, O; - _ ; i r ~~~~~li < , , II. - / d`~ ACR REMARKS ~ ' / e? - - - TYPE OF BLD. - - ~ < PROP. CLASS - l/~~! ~=~-~C ~~~(~/!il~~^.i ~#1 C~~~ G--1~~~~ ~O~ ~J~-!/'e~j.~.~.~/~ ;~C .~J/i~;'ZCf~.~r~//_~_`~ LAND IMP.`~~ TOTAL DATE L./~' t ~ ~'~/~~~Zt )fii{~,~, e ~ ~ - _ _ - 722,_ - / 1 fig _ ~ I~ z~a ~~c>J P6? ~?9~05- rePlacel B~ ~7r~ _ - '~~8 ~9~7b1a Y~Places Bow-~7?~l - - _ - - - ~1t) ~P#~_~9707 re.~~ces aP~$a~~a~ - _ - ~I~ ~P.#= ~97o r'e~ )acs, G~,#~~7f~~ _ - - ~ ~ a ? ~ rr° -t~~k_~`~3~110 ~'P glace, 6 V ~ a ~7 i - - y rsos f3P~ 31~{~ r ate, rem,- ~~z t i6 i3 ~b(a - ~#Z~replace<.. BP's ? 14~F~7 r - _ ~ o"~ ~'~t~ 1~"~ R in~e, ~ ~ ~.H ~,r~1-tol~~ to Unl'~- a ~u~~ c-~ ~ P= ~3`I~~ r~fhr~m a cl~ ~ C~,ti_# rs--- _ - -__j t~rlor _ I ,fin 1~~~7 (jP$~~35Yb jn ItP~Y4ti6slS - t~ 1y - DEPTH 5 8 OS BP# 3 g~ 00~ S jpVe c6 JC MEADOWLAND - ~ - BULKHEAD ~ I~ ~g 3 I S QS_ ~ Y,i.l I { ' Q /it x(11 h~ )F #1 tt l _ - _ ~ id Og B~~ 341st Ye kic.¢-t u., a L. ek~~r; -c~tta~~1~9 _ - - T.I ~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY ` RECORD ~ CARD OWNER., STREET 5 ~ VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT ha_~~o~f-~-~ ~,cc ~ur ~n.5a~ ~fD~s Ivf rt I~:~~,~~ G,-~~ . ~,~f- I U FORMER OW~`1ER) N E ACR. -•t°C~~C~ - rnun~ ~":c l~ V C ~ . " ~:7". ~;~r" I , S`7.. b;-cic It r- ~ ~r~~ -l r a ~ ~ vJ eea l~l ~ a I I 1 I ~ ~n - a- S , I ~ . . r - l~c y ~ ~ P ,w ~a I+-,_ l s w ~ TYPe of Btu 'trv~-- d ~ I RES. SEAS. VL. FARM COMM. CB. MICS. Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS _ f loG, ~ L "QQ ~ ~iGQ 5 ~l 95 -~I _ -.r)~-~ ~o c ~Ir _ ~'.~>UC~r`v L J3_;.9 (~rj o~~j 100 'J Z ~ cJ i 2 ~3 q ~ I rl ; a ( i~_w ~n ~-f > ~{i- ; ~L:~C,. 7 ~13~ ~ll~J'9 aD9- 3r ~ ~ ~ fa i?S°n,fo~s diis4 '78r 116r1G I~~ I!il•4ri =s~- c ~O'-~ - 473 9 S3 -5-12 6 OWNER: SHORES INC BREEZY NUMBER# DATE TYPE CO # USE/DESCRIPTION 23440 5 15 96 PERMIT REPAIR COTTAGE #25 - 23441 5 15 96 PERMIT REPAIR COTTAGE - #7 - 23442 5/15/96 PERMIT REPAIR COTTAGE #25 - 23443 5 15 96 PERMIT REPAIR CTG #12 Tillable Woodland 23444 5 15 96 PERMIT REPAIR COTTAGE #4 _ - Meadowland 23623 8/08/96 PERMIT REPAIR EXISTING SEASONAL COTTA- House Plot BULKHEAD Total _ . - - , a W v ? f' %1~7~~-i _ ! l OWNER STREET VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT _ FORMER OWNER N E ACR. ~l'~~s-~ ~`~:'-I? S W TYPE OF BUILDING f /Jf ES. SEAS. VL. FARM COMM. CB. MICS. Mkt. Value - LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS u.f-... e.~: Yd'D ? $ ~ yG ' U 5'~ - ~ / ~"o-0 3 ov wtie~ ~ , a,;, /D ~G~ Col - u ; S o a 2 ~ - - - y _ , f O ? D ~''.'1. O J~ OC7 • iy /rte '~faa ~ x i 9~-0 ' G'~.~.. _ 92 '~7 a _ ~ o o-o -Z d-"7 / k~ 30L 3S °io ~o /o~z7~~ s'y~n' ~ 3~a 3 ~~r d, .3 s~°- /6Z ~r ~l.t 4~_ jl I ( ~ / ~ y A',i i' i /~J1j/~ / ~?1 C~ ` .,+~~~~Cb~SA~~= ZC ~r._)cr1. l_: ~1nz°7 AGE _ BUILDING CONDITION o~? ~..~IAlar,l~i"E2_r1~ i~ ~ ~ VEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE ~ ARM Acre Value Per Value Acre O.BO - - _ ; illable ~ FRONTAGE ON WATER ~ `I 'z''" ~ I~ / - (+=i e.' '„c\.•1'c aGl ~.\ry~a Nl/i~Hl ~\YC= /oodland i FRONTAGE ON ROAD - - i leodowland ~ DEPTH - _ _ - ouse Plot j BULKHEAD otal DOCK r._ . ,k.,, s;,,:,...._- :na ~ k F:,.:~na.in 213NM0 ~ ~~~.>x 3t~ _ COLOR TRIM <tension ~ ~Sh ~`°tq - yr derision ~ 3 ~ - aension ~ G1 ~ - 6 `f.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ c~-Z~<<, /S _ ~p 0~ Foundation Bath Dinette i rch -v S ~ ~ Basement Floors K. rch ~ ~ a7G - -l/ 0 3 " Ext. Walls Interior Finish LR. =_ezewoy d' ' ~ .Z iY 4 r> .,~,.,.2~_ Fire Ploce Heat DR. cr U rage- ~ Type Root Rooms 1st Floor gR. too (Recreation Room Rooms 2nd Floor I FIN. B B ~ Dor er Drivewoy tal ~~NV suc.l s'<~a~r - - o~+e ~'O ~Jr n. 1 r r ~ ~ 3 ,~3: AQd~.. ~~n-v.~.\ ~~.rt~ 307 ?O, 77_,p ~ ~ VNER rs~`svs~.,1"~ '~rr~`j. STREET ~ VILLAGE. DIST. SUB. LOT ~ - •.Y.' a 1. ti~ , , OWNER e~"'~y+r~°` ,:STREET t FORMER OWNER ~ N ` ~ ~ l~/ + ACR. S , W ' TYPE OF BUILDING ~ _ _ _ - - - - t - _ MISC. Mktg Value RES. SEAS. Vl. `FARM COMM CB 1 LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS t' ~ ~ ^ E , / . _ _ ~ L+~L_~~ ~ 1. L.1 L i ~ ~ / I ..i f ~l ~ 'I 1.-f~l i ~ ~nG~~-;~~j~+_. L I L ~ ! I r ,~~1 ; r ' ' i 1. ( ` . ~ ~ ~4/, - _ - ACE BUILDING CONDITION ~ „ ~i ~ c ~ S-n n _ - NEW NORMAL BELOW A60VE - - FARM Acre Value Per Value T Acre ~~GG~IIGe'S G~ e><o o-. ?~O d illoble 1 / jy 'f +%v /j ~ v G J O d illable 2 illable 3 ~ ~;7 p , ~ o ,n - - /oodlond ~ ~ Ca ; ` ~ roompland FRONTAGE ON WATER 4 10 //>i~ ~C7 ~ d C~i ~ushland FRONTAGE ON ROAD ouse Plot DEPTH - -I - ' r BULKHEAD`>{~c~z.e f7~0+ S00 ~ ~ /S~ °0 2;l Shp _ /Oti~L ~ y ~ o >tal 996K / ~G_.c_ C~ SO'; 'o v r .r .b s' ~ A . _ e F' - , _ -r- r COLOR - -r j ~ ~ n 1 a - -1-- - - 1- `s 0 TRIM i--- _ - - ~o - - - - t- ~ rr I - - - _ ~ ~ _.I--- - - - - - - 3 i~ - - i i.-i_. 7 ~ `1 ` s - - -r ~ Foundation ~ ° Bath ~ Dinette M. Bldg ~ ~ .t _ I,. ~ ~ ~ ~:L ~ o o ~ tf • - 1 ~ ~ - - - - ~ 1 ~osGS w~~l' hou ~c~ ~ ~ - Basement ~ ' Floors K. Extension _l ~ _ ~ r 3 C~ i n , l c_ - - CLc~la 'u a~ti,sC i~9~~~i, Ext. Walls Interior Finish LR. Extensi z; ~ w~ ~ - bo~.Yd 3di~e~! l _ Extension ' ' - _ . Fire Place Heot DR. - _ ~ ~ i ~ z l ~ o i ~w Type Roof Rooms 1st Floor BR. ~ I j~ecreation Roo Rooms 2nd Floo FIN. B.} Porch ~ ' I y y ~ ~ ~ ~_`f-T Porch ~ ~ ~ i r~ e " Dormer i Y ~ ~ ~ ~ `Y Driveway Breezeway r~/ x i = t I " s / O ~ I - u-» ' o ~ Gorage _ - ~ ~ Patio ~ <l~>= yr`f~ yo a ~v z n - U ~>i iy = 1 1l, O. B. - Total ~ ~ 't / i3,Y~ i0~d anY~ i r-b anY ? NI ~ ~2A-Fl-y , =a o C,f{~-~~ i ~ ~ ~ 666.0 sl.~ ~K~~ - 9, i j s • ,1 ~ ° % - a-a9: i ~2,taL~riv~t,Fs 11 G-~~GYt~ 6ow~5 ' v:.,a. ~ 5a- s- 59. io a~,~ - L Cede w ::r 59- I- 39. ~ JQWtal6~" /~l (?a y ~ 53- S-I}:/a 6reczy Sl~,xs. assoc.. S{-a,'h v~^ ,ri. Jc-K.a~cc+- by v ~ 53- s-a ~ ~ u ' - 53 - s- 3 1t~F3S 1 'n• 53-5-3 J i• e nor I ~ y : 53 - 5' 9 53-5- la 'r. ey \:>1 `'f I;. 'r ~y 5 3- b- w:..8 .53^5-ILR an........,. I. .w. I a i yyyy„ 5}-a-~a.V ~ I F X , ` , , ~ ~ . ' ~ e' a- asp ( x• u $3- µt.8 7, T 53 - 4- 4y,10 I 53- - ,3 b..e~ ~ ~ -t- sr~,, =sue _ -r==-= - . >.y x r N . - . . c SUFFDLN © a - se al - . J y u .swio..perwy _ w a y° 0.~.~ X >vr B ' 1\ y v . . \ v (1) UNAUTIGRIZEO ALIEFPTGry OR ppDITW }0 MI5 SVFVEV iS P NIXATW OF S£LTM J309 CF ME HEW YCFN SLdiE EDVLATCN LPW. (2) DISIAHCES SROMN NEREON EADN pRWERiY VNES LO E%ISTXG SIRUCNRES 4RE i0i A SPECIFIC PURPOSE PND PRE NOL i0 BE VSEO i0 ESipBUSN pRWERTY LIXE$ GP i0R ERECTdI Ci FENCES. (3) COPIES Ci M15 SVRYEY N p NOi BEPRIXG TIE LPND $VP~EYdt'S INMEO $EPL pt EMBOSSED SE>L SR>LL NOi BE CIXISIOERED i0 BE p VAUO TRUE COpY, (d) CEFTFlCATW ' INDICPIED HEPEW $XALL RVN MLY i0 ME PERSON Fqi XHW ME SVRKY IS PREPARED AHD M HIS 9ENglF TO ME THE CWPANY. GOVEPNMEHTPL pGENLY ANO L£NgHG INSTNTON USTED MEREW, gry0 TO ME ASSIGIEES GF TIE L£NdHG INSTINTM. CERTIFICAPONS PRE NOi IRAN4ERPBlF LO AODITMAL INSTNTp15 pV SV95EWEXT ONHERS. (5) T1E LOCPTON OF WELLS (W), SEPTC iPKKS (Si) y LESyOLLS (Lp) SXOMN XEREM PAE FRW F1,1D WSEPVPTONS AND OR DATP C9iNNE0 FROM OTIFRS. 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 ~ tel. 631.T2'f.2303 Fax. 631.'121.0144 adminoyoungenglneermg.com OLtI~~ 4~ ~O~t12~ ~ N Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor N T}wmas G. Wolpert, Professional Engineer / Douglas E. Admw, ProPesslonal Engineer o ry Robert G. last, Architect N ~I 0 • $ s 0 N O N (F~ N r 3 m 5 V~ r ~ StE~E~V~® ~ jQ1~ of o , ~ J _ ~ ~F~jp3 < ~OpRD OF A~pEp~ SURVEYORS GuERTIFIGATION `4 o r I s` ~ Y T~ i Q ~ ~ / ' ~ f ~/~/J/'''~/w~~_//ry~"''y~~W~~_~~- MCC.JJJ'`W~i `GJ~ O IpAT OM° X ~ N{~~"'~ ~ (1 ~{Y IDO MIZRAHY {{{fff ` 45L,f~'J`\~ TTI~E 2~ HOWARD W. YOVN5, N.Y.S. LS. NO. 456Q3 ~~~~LANOS~~ E I m ~ ~fld~ o °ff ~ ~ D bbDOpfl09~~ SURVEY FOR o °aaoooa~. IDO MIZRAHY ~ 'k+w GOTTA6E 25, "BREEZY SHORES" 6 at breenport, Town of Southold a ~ Suffolk County, New York BUILDINb PERMIT SURVEY County Tax Map o~miml 1000 Section 53 am~x OS LTe P/O 12.6 MAP PREPARED JAN. 09, 2013 Record oP Revlelone RECORD OF REVISIONS DATE bENERAL AMENDMENTS MAR 04 2013 S `o • o r ~ 51 TE MAP ;q-, 400 0 200 40o eoo a SCALE: I "=400' Scale: I" 400' .toe No. 2012o2To DWS. 2010_0203~IwdbbV010_0203_2012_02TO~p I OF 3 O =MONUMENT SET ¦ = MONUMENT FOUND Q. =STAKE SET ~ =STAKE FOUND CA12ED PL1FRpTgI DIi AO%i1dJ i0 1H1~ SDRS4r 5 A V0.PPDN Lf $ECl1W V109 6 T2 NEW rLQN Si 4iE EWUTCN UW. DISXUEtESLSH~ LyEPXO LEXOGINPG=XS~TPIWONmusiEO FE1 CQYr. ANA CO 111E nSSGYEES Cf INE CLENDI~NC NS Nllp•. CEflPFlCAlI0N5 ARE NOiPINANSiERABLFi10L ODIlIU11Lg1INS~TNTtH CP 83WEXi ON1VSEfl5. V(5)~E~OCAPCN~C! MELL15 (W)TMSEPTCroiNIK~(~ Y LES'PCCIS (CQ)~OMNDH RECN ALL FRCM Ei1EW CB~sLRVAOTW SANG DR` DPi CRi~NNEO fRW0.0 E 5~ urwm (i~NO1u1ED NEREON srvnu Rux DNFr io lrvE vsasax Rw x«ou me suRVEr Is vREVnREO Arv «rs eE«us *a TIE nn~ couvnrvr, l \ / \ ~ 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 ~ ~ tel. 631.1213303 fax. 631J2'1.0144 ' LEGEND ~ \ admlMyoungengineering.com o~~zg ~o~t~g a C \ E Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor `1 = CONCRETE DOVER ~ _ _ Thomas G, wolpert, Profeaalonal Engineer 9 ~ =WATER METER ~ \ \ W _ f Douglas E. Adams, Professional Er,gMeer w D ~ =VALVE ¢ -"O~/ n1 ~ =HYDRANT ~~`AT~AQ, ~ ~ Robert G. Teat, Fvchitect ° FIX • FIXED DOCK T'~„fs• \ \ ~ FLO • FLOATING DOCK *T.N r WOOD STORAbE ~ of W5 ' ° GE s CELLAR ENTRY ~ ~ ~ S NOTES o RO =ROOF OVER r ep •l/1 rv 09 = WTDDDR SHOWER • ryi G_28 =FRAME COTTAGE t NJM3ER O'~6 ~ '3?@' ~"~1~ 'Y _ 3.09 = (SURVEY) ELEVATION aq rD ° % 69 = (RECORD) ELEVATION 'y. ~>E9Q ~ h0 FLOOD INdJRANGE RATE MAP PANEL NO. %10360159 H LAST DATED SEPT. 23, 2009 N r?FrLANDS FLAB a NJMeeR a.u ''O6 '9°°p~~ QO ~ uL` ~ e~ ~a' ~ ' `sch Y b sy. aw rjeh?~eM/ $ "t ~ ~ °I n ry le.F sT ZOt~X~.^~~ ~ R; ~ ~ . i~ SURVEYOR'S GERTIFIGATION N tl , I~ ~ II d. y c ~ ~ ;'o- f; , ~ ,i'~.. } ~ - ~ ~ r ~ r j .:,fit ,nS j h° ~l ® +~.n _ t U ~ f _ ~ ~ ~r, a U HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. .9. NO. 45893 ~~SiT l LUL a aee MITIES - _ i s ~~URV~Y POR ry ~ 1D0 M1ZRP~HY 0~ g = , ~ COTTAGE 25, 118REEZY SHORE511 *a'° at 6reenport, Town of Southold *'s+ 1 Suffolk County, New York e awl ~ 6 ,a ~ n ry ~ a.IW BUILDING PERMIT ° `/EY U e ~ j. County Tax Map o~so-~a 1000 s•«IOX 53 e1o=k OS Loc P O ~ . ~ ~ .n MAP PREPARED .IAN. 09, 2013 .'.eh (i . ~ ~ ~ Record oP Revialona wH ~ '41. RECORD OF REVISIONS DATE '4Yq~~TL4,yp8 r5 MAR 04 2013 F,q6 ~Un~ INED E OF ~ '4RY +e.~ ~ 3/$//~ S °oo m PLAN ~ o Is 3o bo g ~K~AD JT ~ _ ' a SGALE~. 1' . 30' Scale: I" 30' a VERTICAL DANM ° NAVD 1988 ,106 2012-0210 DWG.2010_0203_nwdB8~2010_0203_2012_0270_bp 2 OF 3 Q =MONUMENT SET ¦ = MONVMENT FOUND Q • STAKE SET ~ = STAKE FOUND (1) VNAUTIMI$EO ALIERATW DR PppITON i0 TiIS SURVEY IS > NOLATW Cf YCTDN ]$09 M TIE NEW TMK SiPiE EDUCATM LAW. (2) DISTANCES SXDMN NEREW RW PRLVEfltt TINES LO Eq$TNC SIRUCNRES ARE FOfl p SPEtliIC PURPOSE AND ARE XOi t0 BE VSED LO ESiPBLISN PROPERTY VHES qi FCR ERECl1d1 OF FENCES. (J) COPIES Ci MIS SUfl1£Y NPP NGi BEPAXIC ME LPXD $VRYEYpi'S INKE? SEAL M FMBDSSED SEPL SHALL NOi BE Lg9CERE0 LD ~ P VALID 1RUE COPY (P) CERIIEILATM - INOICPIEp XFREW SHALL RUN WLY i0 ME PERSpI FOR MNgI TIE SURVEY IS PREPARED AND M XIS BEXALF i0 TIE TRF COMPANY, COKRNMENiPL PC£NCY pNp 1£NDING INSTTITON LISTED HEREp1. AND i0 iNE ASSIGNEES Cf ME TENDING INSTTITON. CERTFlCATMS ARE NOi 1RANSFEAABL£ i0 ADDIPMPL IXS11N11 CNS pi SVBSEW ENi ONNERS (5) ME LOCAIICN OF N£LLS (W). SEPTC TANKS (S7) k f£SSPOOLS (CP) SNONH MEREW ME FROM iIF1D CBSERVATOXS AHD OR DPiP OBTAINED iRON OMERS. 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901 ~ tsl. 631.'12'!.2303 Pax. 631.T2T.0144 admin®youngenglneering.com O~tT~~ 4~ Yf4Ltl~~ e Thomas G. Wolpert, Professional Engineer ~ Douglas E. Adams, Professional Erlglneer MI Robert G. Tast, AYGhltect h 0 s k r-~• ~r . ° O T i ~ s i L _ ~ F~~ O O ~ L~~p N Y1I O O ~ JIN11lJ{ •1 o I o KITCHEN NTH ~ SURVEYOR'S GERTIFIGATION o BR 1 fffF. ~W~+• ~(WtlD ~ ~ s.a• G n _ -'1 ~ y~ ~ ~ i+ ' c m q3 ~ _ BR 2 DINING ~ ~ SUN ROOM HOWARD W. YOUNb, N.Y.S.'t5. N0.4589 45g- g~ E . Rm ~ ~ SURVEY f OR s a ~ ~ IDO MIZRAHY - GOTTA6E 25, "BREEZY SF+ORES" o SfEPS ~ ' at Greanport, Town of Southold WOW DECK Suffolk Gounty, Naw York BUILDINb PERMIT SURVEY Gounty Tax Map o~sm~L 1000 xTUan 53 6moM OS ~m P/O 12.6 'k r-r ~ r-~ ~r r~ ~T- MAP PREPARED JAN. 09, 2013 ,s-r r-w• ra,/Y F t-~' 1S 5 31'~ f~ tBa ~ RECORD of REV151oNS cord of Revlaions DATE '{L GENERAL AMENDMENTS MAR 04 2013 • `o 'c i m FLOOR PLANS a '/J'1 Nn Scale: NTS JOB NO. 2012-02'10 DWG. 2010_0203_navd88~2010_0203_2012_02"IO~p ~ OF 3 ~ =MONUMENT SET ¦ = MONUMENT FOUND Q. =STAKE SET ~ =STAKE FOUND PRG?CSED m ADDITION 1G'-i" A" 15'-2" 3'-11 i/2' --=fib-- = N c NWH O s d -rT ~ r REF. ~ SHOWER w s C~i ii'4~L m 1'_9" ~ GREENPORT, NY HOWE ROWDER RM ~ 25 BREEZY SHORES _ _ _ ~ - - ~ ARCHITECT BEDROOM 1 ~ ~ KITCHEN ~ FRANK UELLENDAHL 0 0 123 CENTRAL AVENUE i ~ P.O.BOX 316 ~-o o CREENPORT, NY 11944 iEL 631-477 9624 ~ ~ OWNER o IDO MIZRANY W ~ COTTAGE 25 ° g BREEZY SHORES ~ 226E 2ntl SUeel, Apl.Ic x NEW YORK, NY 10009 3 TEL: fi46-498-1086 ENCLOSED PORCH BEDROOM 2 SUN ROOM E~ `(~~4 ,ti ,j i'F' ~ HEIGHT OF WALL: 5'-11" $ 6 z 3 O ~4,~ 13'-1" A~ 8'-10" 6'-91{2" k" ~ ~ 33'-4 1/2" ~ ~ z o o ~ a DATE. 02/22/2013 SCALE 1/4"= I'-0" 3< E~DGR ?SAN AS-BUILT s ~ DWG. NAME r o EXISTING FLOOR PLAN DWG NG A-1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" PROPOSED m ADDITION ~ ~ ~ ~ N / ~ ~ COi ii~4V~ _ ~ ~ GREENPORT, NY 25 BREEZY SHORES o ARCHITECT FRANK UELLENDAHL o° 123 CENTRAL AVENUE - P.O.BOX 316 mo GREENPORT, NY 11944 TEL, 631-477 8624 OWNER i ? ? ? ~ IDO MIIZRAHY I COTTAGE ~ 25 o BREEZY SNORES o ~ 226E 2nd Street, ApLtc i ~ ~ NEW YORK, NY 10009 I ~ TEL 646-498-706fi I ~ I I I ~ ~q ~ ~ 9 2 C~ NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION Y 1 q s i 3 _O O ¢ O_ ~ O DATE: 02/22/2013 ' ~ a SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0` ~o x SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION ~ ~ EEEVATIONs AS-BUILT o a DWG. NAIZE EXISTING ELEVATIONS A-z DWG. ND SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-O" PROPOSED ADCiTION 30'-612" 2'-10" 1'-8" R a k~~ lo' 1° ,p~ 15-2° 'k°, 3-,~~ ~2 6 N HWH ~ rr ~ r _ CO. „`,G I a I ~ _ O O - WAD ~ ~ GREENPORT, NY _ ~pW J ~ 0 _ _ ~ SHOWER ~ 25 BREEZY SHORES ' ~ I KITCHEN BATH RM o ARCHITECT FRANK UELLENDAHL 123 CENTRAL AVENUE _ - - - - - - _ - ~ P.O.BOR 316 4a°X24' ISLAND °J o GREENPORT, NY 11944 BEDROOM REF. L ~ CLOSET 3'-D° ~ rEE 631-4n es24 OWNER IDO MIZRANY DECK conacE N 2s BREEZY SHORES ~ 226E 2nd Streel, ApLic - ~ ~ NEW YORK, NY 10009 a 3 TEL, 646-498-7086 A I ~ ' ~ ~ f o SITTING ROOM ~ DINING SUN ROOM 9 * ~ ~ d 5osa s o ~ „ ~ ~ WOOD DECK PROPOSED ALTERATIONS -NEW WINDOWS, SIDING, AND ROOFING - RAISE EXT'G ROOF BY ca 1'-4" TO IMPROVE CEILING HEIGHT AS PER CODE s'-o' ~ -RAISE EXT'G FLOOR ELEVATfON BY ~10" ~ TO INSTALL NEW FLOOR FRAMING o a t3'-t" A~ e'-1o" ~ 6'-912° -REPLACE ROTTEN WOOD FOOTINGS onre o4/3o/2oi3 r WITH 36" DEEP 8" DIA CONCRETE ~N scAle 1/4" = 1'-0" i 3'-4° ~ 13'-5" ~ 16'-71 2 ~ o FOOTINGS PROPOSED ' -COTTAGE TO BE LIFTED UP TO ALLOW FLOOR PLAN THE NEW FOOTINGS TO BE (INSTALLED ~ o ~ DWC. NAME PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN DWG. ND A-3 SCALE: 1/4" = i'-0" PROPOSED m ADDITION ~ ~ N a rr ? r ~ ~ CO. ~,G • ~ GREENPORT, NY RAISE ROOF BY ~1'-4" ~ 2s eREEZr sHOREs o ARCHITECT FRANK UELLENDAHL 9 123 CENTRAL AVENUE s P.O.BO% 316 o CREENPORT, NY 11944 TEI: 631-477 8624 DWNER IDD MIZRAHY m ~ COTTAGE ~ 25 ~ o BREEZY SHORES N e 0 ~ 226E 2nd Slreet, ApL1c NEW YORK, NY 10009 3 TEL 646-498-7086 I 0 Dq I NORTH ELEVATIQ~ I WEST ELEVATION ,~~~QQ ~ fl I I J LJ LL a LJ ~ ~ + , .V RAISE FLOOR ELEVATION BY ~10" ~ 9 a ~ ~ a m o o ~ a DATE: 04/30/2D13 y ~ ~ SCAIE'. 3/16" - 1' 0" j= _ I x ~ PROPOSED I i I I SOUTH ELEVATIQN a ! I I EAST ELEVATION ELEVATIONS L J L J L J L .1 L U L J e L. J I_ J L J L J DWG. NPME PROPOSED EEEUATIONS °g A-g ©a DWG, NO SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"