Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-123.-6-14 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) $outhold, NY 11971 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Jim King, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: May 13, 2013 Re: Proposed Wetland Permit and Coastal Erosion Permit for EUGENE L. DANERI SCTM#1000-123-6-14 A permit (6428) for a similar action was issued in 2006. The bulkhead was not included within the permit issued. A LWRP Coastal Consistency review was also conducted in 2006 and the action was recommended as INCONSISTENT. At that time reviews were conducted differently citing setbacks as the reason an action was recommended as INCONSISTENT. EUGENE L. DANERI requests a Wetland Permit to demolish existing dwelling and existing accessory wood framed structure and construct 44'x60' two-story dwelling with 10'x44' pomh attached to southern side; install a new sanitary system; construct a 24'x36' detached garage; construct approximately 68 linear feet of vinyl bulkhead in-place of and up to 18" higher than existing timber bulkhead; construct 10' westedy and easterly returns; backfill storm damaged area with approximately 150 cubic yards of clean sand/loam fill; and install a 10' wide non-turf buffer landward of the bulkhead. Located: 200 Terry Path, Mattituck. SCTM# 123-6-14 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. 'Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposal is CONSISTENT with the LWRP provided the Board considers the following: 1. The entire parcel is located within Flood Zone and therefore there is no ability to relocate the structure outside of the flood zone (See Figure 1 ). 2. It is recommended that the drywells be relocated to increase the distance from the bulkhead and outside of the VE flood zone. 3. The survey references two high water lines. One along bulkhead and one further seaward. It is recommended that the Board establish the correct wetlands line. Figure 1. Subject parcel showing Flood Zone. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in pr written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Lori Hulse, Assistant Town Attorney .~paring its Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Watexfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other inforraation used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt action~ including Building Permits and other mini, terial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). 3: If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will 'affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail, listing both supporting and non- suooorfine facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. 'A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold ' s website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees O local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 123 6 PROJECT NAME DANERI 14 {]0ar0 0f Tr~? The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate respoase): To Boara [-1 oaraofT [] 1. Category of Town of Southold age. ney action (check appropriate'response): Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital [] -consaucfion, planvlng activity, agency regulation, land transa,?dun) [] Co) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification; Nature and ex-tent of acfiom Applicant-proposes to demolish existin9 dwelling and accessory wood framed structure and construct a 44'x 60'i 2 story three bedroom frame dwelling (w/t0' x 44' attached porch); install new sanitary system and detached garage; and replace in place of (and up to 18" higher than) existing storm damaged timber bulkhead;l 24' X construct 10' westerly and easterly return; and backfill storm damaged area with approx 150cu.yd. clean sand/loam and 10' non-turf buffer landward of bulkhead to remain. Locafionofacfi0n: ROW (Terry Path)off Camp Mineola Road, Mattituck S~tcac~3~¢:, 0.93 acre+/- Pre~nt.land use: Single Family Dwelling Present zoning classification: R-40 ff an application, for the proposed action has been filed w~th the Town of Southold agency, the following in.format/on shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: ~ugene L. Daneri ~) Mailing address: P.O. Box 917, Mattituck, New York 11952 (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( ). (s16) 808-3975 (d) Application number, if any:. N/A Will the action be directly undertaken, requh:e funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ~ No[--] ' frye. s, which state or federal agency? NYSDEC C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy I. FOster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure~ makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section IH- Policies; Page 2 for evaluation ~ Yes [] No ~-] Not Applicable This proposal is consistent with the policy in that it is simply an improvement of the existin~ conditions on the lot. This improvement is in the living conditions, as well as the use of the lot area. The proposed dwelling is located more'landward of the situate Wetlands than the existing dwelling. The proposed sanitary system will also be located more landward of the situate wetlands than the existing system and be brought up to current code. The proposal also involves the demolition of an existing dilapidated accessory structure and is consistent with the character of the community. Attach ndditional sheets ~necessaty Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southald. Sec LWRP Section IH ~ Policias Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria [~ Yes [] No [~ Not Applicable Policy 2 is not applicable in that the subject lot and surrounding neighborhood cannot be deemed a substantial historic and/or archeolo~ical resource. Attach addi~onal shee~ if necessary Poficy 3. Enhance v~ual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section IH- Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evalua~on criteria [] Yes [] No ~ Not Applicable This proposal will enhance the visual quality of the surroundlnq area by movin~ the proposed dwellinq further landward of the existing bulkhead while remaining consistent with the character of the neighborhood. The scenic resources and views of the Great Peconic Bay will be similarly enhanced. Al~ach additional shee~s if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section m - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No ~ Not Applicable This proposal will minimize loss of life, structures and natural resources from floodinq by replacinq in place the existin~ storm damaged bulkhead with a new vinyl bulkhead a~d also by moving dwelling further landward of the situate wetlands and the area effected by flooding and erosion. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria Policy 5 is not applicable in that this proposal will have no effect on the water quality/supply within the surrounding area. A~c~ additional sheets if nec, essary Policy 6. Protect and restore the' quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems inciuding Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section m - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. ' Yes No Not Applicable This proposal will maintain, if not enhance, the quality of the surrounding, ecosystem by replacing in place the existing storm damaged bulkhead with a new vinyl bulkhead and also by moving the dwelling further landward of the situate wetlands. This proposal will further protect the local ecosystem by installing a new sanitary system that is further landward of the situate wetlands. AtIach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section IH - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [~]No[~ Not Applicable Policy 7 is not applicable iu that this proposal will have no adverse effect on the air quality in the Town of Southold. A~mch additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. M'mimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section HI - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluatioO criteria. --L_Jyes [] No ~ Not Applicable Policy 8 is not applicable in that this proposal does not involve solid waste, hazardous substances · or the disposal and/or transportation thereof. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section HI ~ Poficies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluati5n criterL~ '[-'] Y~ No~NotApplieable Policy 9 is not applicable in that this proposal concerns private property which does not involve public access to coastal waters, public lands and public resources and therefore will not impede public access to same. Attach addi~onal sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III- Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [--] No [] Not Applicable This proposal will maintain, if not enhance, as well as protect the water-dependent use of water recreation by the proposed installation of a new sanitary system that is further landward of the situate wetlands Which will further protect surface water from contamination by human effluent. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section/II- policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ~ Yes ~] No [] Not Applicable Policy 11 is not applicable in that this proposal does not involve any for~ of marine resource management (e.g. commercial fisheries, recreational fisheries, aquaculture, etc.). A~..h additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural.lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. N yes ~-~ No [] Not Applieable Policy 12 is not applicable in that this proposal does not involve apricultural lands (e.g. the conversion of farmland, the establishment and/or maintenance of new costal agricultural production, Attn._ch addi~onal sheet~ if n~..e.~ary Poficy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III- policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ~-] Yes [] No ~ Not Applicable Policy 13 is not applicable in that this proposal does not involve the conservation of enerpy resources on a cor0~ercial leveI ahd/or the promoti6n of alternative enekpy sources~ proper ~aintenance of fuel storage ~acilities and/or ~he extraction of minerals. PREPARED BY Eupe'ne L. Daneri TITLE Owner DATE 4 - 16 - 13 S~tua're: 200 Pdvate Road 'I 7 (Terry Path); ~aftituck, Town of Soufhold, NY SCTM¢ 1000-123-6-14 Photos to, ken on March 30, 20~3 View of SE and NE Corners of House DANE~ STAKING PLAN Situate: 200 Private Road 17 (Terry Path); MaftJtuck, Town of SouthoJd, NY SCTM# t 000- 'I 23-6-14 Photos taken on March 30, 2013 View of NE and SE Corners of House DA~E~I STA~(~NIG PLAN Situate: 200 Private Road 17 ITem? Path); Mattituck, Town of Southold, NY SCTM# 1000- t 23-6- 14 Photos taken on March 30, 2013 View of SW and NW Corners of House DANERI STAKING PLAN Situate: 200 Private Road 'l 7 (Terry Path); ~Aattituck, Town of Southold, NY $CTM# 1000-123-6-14 Photos taken on March 30, 20t3 View of NW c~nd SW Corners c~f Hn~ DAN~ STA~G PLA~ Situate: 200 Private Road t7/Terry Path); MatHtuck, Town of SouthoJd, NY SCTM # t 000-123~-6~- 14 Photos taken on March 30, 2013 View of STM and NW Corners of Garage gANERI STAKING PLAN Situate: 200 Private Road t 7 (Te~ry Path); M, attituck, Town of Southold, NY SCTM # 'J 000-123-6-14 Photos taken on May'ch 30, 20J3 View of NW and SW Corners of Garage DAN~RJ STAKING PLAN Situate: 200 Private Road 17 (Terry Path); MattJtuck, Town of Southold, NY SCTM# 1000-123-6- t 4 Photos taken on March 30, 2013 View of NW and NE corners of Garage DANE~I STAiniNG PLAN Situate: 200 Private Road 17 [Terry Path); ~v'~atfituck, Town of Southold, NY SCTM# 1000- '123-6-14 Photos taken on March 30, 2013 View of SE and NE Corners of House I)ANE~I STAKING PLAN Situafe: 200 Private Road J 7 ('lerry Path); Mattituck, Town of Southold, NY SCTM# 't 000-123-~6-.'14 Photos taken on March 30, 2OI3 View of NE and SE Corners of House DANER] STAKING PLAN Situate: 200 Private Road 'l 7 (Ter'r¥' Path); MattJfuck, Town of Southold SCTM# 1000-123-6.~ 'I 4 Photos to, ken on March 30, 20/3 NY View of SW and NW Corners of House DANE~ STAKING PLAN Situate: 200 Private Road 17 (Terry Path); Mattituck, Town of Southold, NY S CTM # 1000-123-6-14 Photos taken on March 30, 2013 View of NW and SW Corners of Hous~ DANE~ STAKING PLAN Situate: 200 Private Road 17 (Tern/Path/; MatfJtuck, Town of SouthoJd, NY SCTM# 1000-123-6~. 14 Photo~; taken on March 30, 2013 View of sW and NW Corners of Garage DAN~ STAKING PLAN Situate: 200 Private Road 'l 7 (Terry Path); Mattituck, Town of SouthoJd, NY SCTM # 1000~- 123-6-14 Photos Jaken on March 30, 2013 View of NTM and SW Corners of Garage OANE~I STAKiNg PLAN Situate: 200 Private Road 17 (Terry Path): Mattituck, Town of Southold, NY SCTM # 1000-~ 123-6-14 Photos taken on March 30, 2013 View of NW and NE corners of Garage 5~CTION THRIJ PRQPO~ IN*PtACU RI~QVA~ ~ RUPLACU~NT QP ~Y,,TI~PUR PlXLKH~A~  LAM-Od [4" r2P. i~MAN I/4" ~ 9" ~ 10' VINYl. q4~AltJIN6 PRQPO~I2 VINYL FAJLKF[AI:2 It')" × 2(Y' PlLf. O IN Pt/~7.~ [')P P.×, flMF~P, F~LLK~AP BOARD MEMBERS Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson James Dinizio, Jr. Gerard P. Goehringer George Homing Ken Schneider Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road · P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex/First Floor, Capital One Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 · Fax (631) 765-9064 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF DECEMBER 20, 2012 ZBA FILE: 6029 NAME OF APPLICANT: EUGENE L. DANERI (KATHERINE DANERI) SCTM#1000-123-6-14 PROPERTY LOCATION: 200 Private Road #17, (aka Terry Path), Mattituck RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: motion was offered by Member Weisman (Chairperson), seconded by Member Schneider, and duly carried, to GRANT, the requested variances for an easterly single side yard setback of 12 feet with the "dormer" (Bay window) setback of I0 feet, a westerly single side yard setback of 12 feet with a "dormer" (bay window) setback of 11.1 feet and a bulkhead setback of 30 feet for a proposed two-story dwelling in accordance with the judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Spinner, J.), dated October 13, 2010 and affirmed by the decision and order of the Appellate Division, Second Department dated August 1, 2012 and as shown on the survey stamped received by the Board of Appeals August 16, 2007 as follows: survey dated June 20, 2006 last revised August 16, 2007 prepared by Nathan Taf~ Corwin, 'II1 LS., and the correspondence received from Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. dated August 16, 2007; GRANT, the requested variance for a proposed accessory garage 10 feet from the easterly side lot line, in accordance with the Board's determination of September 27, 2007 and as shown on the drawings stamped received by the Board of Appeals on August 16, 2007 as follows: proposed garage plan dated August 15, 2007 as pages Al- 3 prepared by Mark K. Schwartz, Architect and the correspondence received from Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. dated August 16, 2007. Any deviation from the survey, site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision will result in delays and/or a possible denial by the Building Departmem of a building permit, and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals.Any deviation from the variance(s) granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increaxe the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Weisman (Chairperson.). Goehringer, Dinizio, Schneider, Horning. Leslie Kanes Weisman, Cha_irj~erson Approved for filing /~2~c 2~/2012 BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK PERMIT NO. 6428 DATE: August 23~ 2006 ISSUED TO: EUGENE DANERI PROPERTY ADDRESS: 200 TERRY PATH~ MATTITUCK SCTM#123-6-14 AUTHORIZATION Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 and/or Chapter 111 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the m~ting held on August 23. 2006, and in cortsideration of application fee in the sum of $250.00 to the Terms and Conditions as stated in the Resolution, the Southold Town Board of Trustees authorizes and permits the following: Wetland Permit to demolish the existing dwelling, existing dilapidated accessory wood frame structure and existing shed and construct a new 46'X 55' two-story frame dwelling with 10'X 46' porch attached to the southern side, and to install a new sanitary system and detached 24'X 36' garage, with the condition gutters and drywells are installed to contain the roof run-off, a row of staked hay bales with silt retention fencing to be in place prior to the start of construction, and a 10' non-turfl bulkhead, and as depicted on the survey prepared by Joseph A. Ingegno last dated October 25, 2006. Fbl W~iE$3 W~IERE-OF, the sa/dBoardofTmslx~es hereby causes~:~4o~elt~to be and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date. James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 August23,2006 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OFSOUTHOLD APR 5 200/ Mr. William J. Lohn Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. P.O. Box 2003 Bddgehampton, NY 11932-2003 RE: EUGENE DANERI 200 TERRY PATH, MATTITUCK SCTM#123-6-14 Dear Mr. Lohn: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action dudng its regular meeting held on Wed., August 23, 2006 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. on behalf of EUGENE DANERI applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated August 1, 2006, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town ConServation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has furthered Policy 6 of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program to the greatest extent possible through the imposition of the following Best Management Practice requirements: the installation of gutters and .drywells, a row of staked hay bales with silt retention fencing to be in place pdor to the start of construction, and a 10' non-turf buffer landward of the bulkhead, and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on August 23, 2006, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, 5q 199 ' 2 WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that for the mitigating factors and based upon the Best Management Practice requirement imposed above, the Board of Trustees deems the action to be Consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program pursuant to Chapter 268-5 of the Southold Town Code, and, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approve the application of EUGENE DANERI to demolish the existing dwelling, existing dilapidated accessory wood frame structure and existing shed and construct a new 46'X 55' two-story frame dwelling with 10'X 46' porch attached to the southern side, and to install a new sanitary system and detached 24'X 36' garage, with the condition gutters and drywells are installed to contain the roof run-off, a row of staked hay bales with silt retention fencing to be in place prior to the start of construction, and a 10' non-turf buffer landward of the bulkhead, and as depicted on the survey prepared by Joseph A. Ingegno last dated October 25, 2006. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date the permit is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Inspections are required at a fee of $50.00 per inspection. (See attached schedule.) Fees: $100.00 Very truly yours, President, Board of Trustees JFK/Ims 200 James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen John Holzapfel Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK, TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND POSSIBLE REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. INSPECTION SCHEDULE ~Pre-construction, hay bale line 1st daY of construction ~ constructed Project complete, compliance inspection. 201 southold 082306 ro' TRUSTEE BERGEN: I understand. I, understaJ~Lthe denial of hat you are terming "reasonable ~se.' ~jl~t want to make it lear this board doesn't take prog~r~wa~ ?om. people. We ete~m~ne whether or not applicat~e~Fsare going to be approved r d~sapproved or modtfied tn s_J~f_~ ~ner. . TRUSTEE KING: Al~ right,/~_'l_l_ma~e ~ motion to table this pplicatlon. There is a lo/r~of ~nformb, t~on ! want to go over i~h this. Z know the boar~will want :bxrev~ew a lot of h~ngs and ! want to be p~epared tomake~'a decision at next nth's meeting. . TRUSTEE DOHERTY: SeconO. TRUSTEE KZNG: All in favor? (ALL AYES.) TRUSTEE DZCKERSON: Number ~8, suffolk ~nvironmental onsult~ng, znc., on behalf of Eugene Daner~ requests a etland Permit to demolish the ex~sting dwelling, existing dilapidated accessory wood frame structure and existing she~ ~0 and construct a new 46x55 foot two-story frame dwellin9 with ~0x46 foot porch attached to the southern s~de and to ~nstall ~L a ne~ sanitary system and detached 24x36 foot garage. Located: 200 Terry Path, Natt~tuck. ~2 ~s there anyone here to speak on behalf of th~s application? ~3 MR. ANDERSON: On behalf of Environmental Consulting. You have ~efore you an application, ~hich application seeks to [4 demolish an extstlng single-family dwelling, zt is now located 2S-and-a-half feet of the wetland ~oundary. The ~5 wetland boundary in this case ts the mean h~gh water mark as shown on the survey, so w? would demolish that house and 16 while beyond th~s board's 3ur~sd~ction, we would demollsh a second house. There are two houses on the property. .T~.e 17 house tn the rear is in disrepair, zt st~11 carries w~th it a building ~Ight. zt is extinguished here. And it's served by 18 two ex~st~ng cesspools which do not meet current Health Department regulations. And they would be removed, de facto. 19 and you would have a compliant septic s~stem. The new dwel~tng would be 60 feet from the wetland but tt 20 ~ a~r~a~:f:gg~r~~ ~fa~t~uJ~ distance from the ~etland.boundary 50 feet. So the structural 2L distance, ~f you w~ll, th~s ~s between the nearest pr~nc~pl? structure, inclusive of the porch and the wetland boundary ~s 22 doubled in this application. An aerial shows how th~s works with the neighborhood. 23 What you can see from the ~ertal ~s that you are dealing w~th an area that contains multqple dwellings, none of which meets 24 your L00-foot setback rule. ! can tell you this is the second one we have done ~n recent times and in each and every case we 25 sought to move them back, um0 to the extent we feel reasonable. southold 082306 66 1 NOW we don't really.want to move them back too far because he reasonably en3oys the view and we feel there is no 2 reason to ruin that view and also because the property narrows from the waterside from the southern lot line to the northern 3 lot line so the further we move it back the more serious our zoning problems become. 4 As it stands today we w~ll have to go to the zoning board for zoning relating to the side yard boundaries. You should 5 know that there would be no relief required for bulkhead ~etbacks because the code concerning zoning was built into it 6 is to encourage to relocate people further from the bulkhead that is existing, so we would comply with t~at. 7 And I think the upgraded septic system ~s consistent with what this board is trying to do ~n this area. 8 AS a final matter, I would anticipate runoff control by way of gutters into the drywells. [ would anticipate that 9 there would be suitable erosion control by ~ay of sil~ fence and hay bales that would surround the activity Including the l0 demolition of the existing but]dings on the property and z'11 ask for any questions you may have. 11 TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Thank you. Is there anyone else that would l~ke to speak to this? step up to the microphone, 12 please. MR. SMITH: My name is Thornton Smith and I'm a neighbor 13 of Mr. Oaneri's. I known him as long as he has been around. I am a civil engineer and a registered professional sngineer 14 in the State o~ New York and several other 3urisd3ct~ons. I'm also joined th3s evening by my sister who is lending me her 15 glasses. We occupy on the drawing that you just received what are four lots, 19 and 16. 16 Mr. Daneri has the third of ten lots that are all in a row in this area. They are all characterized by having a 17 short dimension on the bay, a short dimension in the back and in Mr. Oaneri's case is 68 feet on the bay and 62 feet in the ~8 back, and then a long, 600-foot north/south dimension. In general, on all of these lots there is almost nothing 19 built on the northern 500 feet of the lots. They are used merely for driveways w~th almost no exception. 20 My sister is not adjacent to the property. I'm adjacent to the property with a 600-foot common border to the east and 21 my sister is to the east of me. we are both here to support the application of Nr. Oaneri 22 to construct a new building, we believe it would be in the ~Sotl~e~t ~ ~ eh~ n~ffoo~ to get the building; w~h 23 s OlU ano Small, particularly the second one, was demolished. 24 ~e have just three items that we would like to bring to your attention; two of them probably are not within the 25 ~urisdiction of your board, while : hope since th~s is th~ ?irst application we heard on this matter, we can put it ~n 2 the record so that these three items, the problems and opportunities associated with the~, can be taken care of. Probably the most important ~s that both the new Page 61 67 southold 082306 structure, which has two sideline setbacks, and the new 3 accessory structure, whtc~ has one, I understand are not in accordance with the building code setback and I trust that 4 that will probably be an issue for the Building Department and not for your board. 5 I do believe, however, that they could design a structure which, two structures, which would be suitable for the 6 property, allow them to have whatever area they might want and be able to meet the building code requirements and that that 7 will not have to be a violation which they would have to take to the zoning board. 8 The second issue which I think is, I just think a plus that could be done here, which I think is under your control. g My lot reaches to the east on this drawing, shows a nine-foot contour and then it shows an eight-foot contour going across 10 the lot of the new building. Th~se contours indicate, as is the case if you are out in the field, that his lot is a little 11 lower than mi~e, particularly where the houses are. ~ think if this building is demolished he has an opportunity to raise 12 his level by a foot to a foot-and-a-half. In the days of global warmng, I think that would be a good idea. 13 He has a bulkhead which is probably one of the oldest in the area. My sister and I have both been on the sites for 70 14 years know the bulkheads don't last for ever. We have, however, and several other houses to the east of us, have fine 15 bulkheads which I think are going to last for some time. Mr. Daneri's bulkhead is one of the oldest in the area 16 and it's about 15 inches~ at least, lower than the adjacent one that I have and my s3ster has. It would seem to me that 17 in raising this area Where the house would be would not necessarily at this time raising, the bulkhead, you would put 18 yourself in the position where when a new bulkhead is needed there, it would be.an advantage to the area to have a new 19 bulkhead that is h~gher and that is properly, house is on a site that is a little higher. 20 The third thing I want to mention, which I think is outside of your ~ur(sdiction, is that on the northern 500 feet 21 where he has an existing driveway now, he is abandoning about 400 feet of it. He's going to cut down what I would say 4,000 22 square feet of pin~ woods ~n order to put in a driveway right next to the one whqch already exists. 23 I don't see any reason why he should make a change to the driveway. He's driven in to t~is site, and his father before 24 him, for 70 years, and I see that he's going to construct a new garage and he needs to turn around safely. But why he's 25 tr)~i~t~.~u: dawn ~. ~)~l:~foresc, ~ don'~ quit~ unOerstanU. Apparently t~at is all outside of your 68 I jurisdiction but z hope that you will be able to bring it to the attention of ?e appropriate parties. Thank you. 2 TRUSTEE KZNG. Thank you. I'RUSTEE DOHERTY: Thank you. Is there any other comment? 3 MR. ANDERSON: ~ust one. The bulkhead is not part of our application. That's the first. The second is that the 4 driveway, they intend to use the same driveways, we won't be doing that. You should correct that driveway, although you Page 62 southold 082306 5 don't need it -- that's a good point. ! didn't see it.. AS far as filling the lot, [ don't know that that 6 that's not usually what we do. we usually, if you fill a lot too much it might cause a drainage problem to others. So 7 that's not something we usually do. We are not opposed to it. TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Bruce, j~st as a question. A lot of 8 the new construction has a certain height that the first floor has to be above, zs the foundation up higher? g MR. ANDERSON: well, it's a good question because if you'll see -- l0 TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Let me just -- I don't have a problem with any of it. what I'm saying is if the foundation sticks 11 two, three, four feet above the ground, it might be a chance to fill in and ~- you know, how some of the new houses, they 12 are built because of the flood plane, have a foundation that sticks four, five feet above the ground level and it makes the 13 house stand out rather uniquely. That's a11, it's just an observation. ~4 MR. ANDERSON: I don't think we designed the foundation yet. I can tell you that down the road where we went through 15 that we did pile-type foundations. It's different. We did it for flood plane reasons. 16 TRUSTEE DICKERSON: If it's something that they feel they need to bring fill in, they could always come in for an 17 amendment. MR. SMITH: 3ust a comment. The suggestion, I would not ~8 suggest raising the existing floor plan more than L5 inches; Z8 at the top. Essentially to make the land where the new 19 house is going to be at the same elevatfon as the land on my property right next door. . 20 I might add that there is on this plan also a small, what is called wood wall on the west side of this:property. It's 21 only about eight.to ten inches high. 5o ths property to the west is also a.llttle higher than the Daner~ property and 22 think filling in, incidentally, right where the house is, Whether you fill in the rest of the property. 600 feet, I have 23 no intention of doing anything there. Even back where the accessory building !s, I'm not sure that would be a need to 24 raise. I'm 3ust th~nking where the house would be. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Thank you. I th~nk the comments about 25 the fill are up to the applicant whether the~ want to pursue that or not, so. Is there any other comment. 69 1 TRUSTEE BERGEN: I had also a suggestion for the applicants, we did note there was a very large holly tree 2 that looks like it's going to be lost due to this construction and just to consider if there is an opportunity to keep that, 3 move it, sell it, whatever. Because it is a beautiful site. TRUSTEE DZCKERSON: Hearing no other comments, I make a 4 motion to close the hearing. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Second. 5 TRUSTEE DICKERSON: All in favor? (ALL AYES.) 6 CRC comments: CRC recommends approval with the condition the bulkhead is replaced on a ten-foot, non-turf 7 buffer installed landward of the bulkhead; drywells, gutters Page 63 13 Southold 082306 are installed to contain roof runoff and the holly tree be 8 relocated. And there are no -- ! don't see any drywells on the plan. 9 Although ! know you anticipate that, I would like to see some. 3ust as a matter of rule, I wnuld like to see drywells 10 put on the plan. I'll make a motion to approve the Suffolk Environmental 11 on behalf of Eugene oaneri and request a wetland Permit to demolish existing dwelling, existing dilapidated accessory 12 wood frame structure and existing shed and construct a new 46x55 foot, two-story frame dwelling with a 10x46 foot porch 13 attached to the southern side and to install a new sanitary system and detached 24x36 foot garage with drywells to contain 14 all the roof runoff, hay bales in front of the bulkhead, at the line of the bulkhead all the way across, during 15 construction. I want to say that we appreciate that you moved the 16 house, the structure back, as far as you did, and with that we feel that it is not to be inconsistent with LWRP. SO I think 17 that was all the stipulations we have on it and that,s the motion I make. And ten-foot, non-turf -- we would l~ke to 18 request also if you could put a ten-foot non-turf buffer behind the bulkhead head. If that lawn is going to be 19 disturbed when you replant, not to replant all the way up to the bulkhead. We don't want lawn all the way up to the 20 bulkhead, zf you could leave a ten-foot non-turf; it could be stone, just not lawn all the way up to the bulkhead. 21 MR. 3OHNSTON: HOW about native species. TRUSTEE DOHERTY: Let me finish. We are in the middle of 22 a motion. Z make that motion. Do [ have a second? TRUSTEE BERGEN: Second. 23 TRUSTEE DOHER~F: All in favor? (ALL AYES.) 24 MR. ANDERSON: of the ten houses there, all of them are planting right up to the bulkhead with good lawns and that 25 would be, I think, out of keeping with the others. TRUSTEE DC)HERO'f: I understand that. what we are trying to 7O i dO, as appTtcantS come iq, is ~e try to correct t~at. I-RUSTEE HOL7~APFEL: YOU might also want to go to the ten 2 neighbors and tell them it would be much more environmently conscious to get rid of the grass right up to the bulkhead and 3 replace it with non-turf buffer. We recommend that· We require it on all our applications. You might want to go back 4 to those people and tell them they could help us. l~USTEE OOflERTY: SO, Bruce~ if we could get 9ew plans 5 with the drywells on it. Make ~t subject to receiving new plan with drywells. Thank you. . 6 TRUSTEE KING: we'll take a five-m~nute recess. (After a brief recess, these proceedings continue 7 as follows.) 8 9 TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: Number 20, Patricia Moore on behalf of Gregersen's Keep, LLC, requests a wetland Permit to construct a 4x34 foot fixed elevated catwalk with steps secured with six-inch diameter pilin~g~-~*xJ.~_foot hinged ramp and 6x20 foot 14 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION GeneralPermit Number GP-0-12-006 PERMIT Under the Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) GENERAL PERMIT GP-0-12-006 Hurricane Sandy General Permit Permittee and Facility Information Permit Issued To: Affected Landowner Facility: Location Listed on Notice of Intent Applicable DEC Region(s): 1,2,3 General Permit Authorized Activity: Sandy. General Permit for repair of damages resulting from Hurricane Description of Authorized Activities: 1. Stabilization of existing functional storm-damaged dwellings, decks and walkways with temporary bracing and pilings; 2. Construction of a single 4' wide access walkway to access damaged dwellings; 3. Installation of up to four rows of sandbags or I cubic yard sand cubes at the toe of storm damaged structures or eroded escarpments; 4. Placement of sand and/or material equivalent to existing material at the toe &eroded escarpments; 5. Repair or reconstruction of stairways that were functional before Hurricane Sandy; 6. Re-grade eroded dunes; 7. In-kind/in-place repair or reconstruction of bulkheads and shoreline erosion structures that were functional before Hurricane Sandy; 8. Repair or reconstruction of existing public roads, bridges, utilities and other public infrastructure. All work shall be done according to the permit conditions contained herein. Permit Authorizations Tidal Wetlands - Under Article 25 Effective Date: 10/31/2012 Expiration Date: 10/31/2013 Excavation & Fill in Navigable Waters - Under Article 15, Title 5 Effective Date: 10/31/2012 Expiration Date: 10/31/2013 Water Quality Certification - Under Section 401 - Clean Water Act Effective Date: 10/31/2012 Expiration Date: 10/31/2013 Coastal Erosion Management - Under Article 34 Effective Date: 10/31/2012 Expiration Date: 10/31/2013 Page 1 of 6 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION GeneraIPermit Number GP-0-12-006 NYSDEC Approval By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees that the permit is contingent upc compliance with the ECL, all applicable regulations, and all conditions included as permit. General Permit Authorized by Permit Administrator: JOHN J FERGUSON, Chief Permit Administrator Address: NYSDEC HEADQUARTERS 625 BROADWAY ALBANY, NY 12233 Authorized Signature: ,~~ % Date: 10/3L Permit Components NATURAL RESOURCE PERMIT CONDITIONS WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION SPECIFIC CONDITION GENERAL CONDITIONS, APPLY TO ALL AUTHORIZED PERMITS NOTIFICATION OF OTHER PERMITTEE OBLIGATIONS NATURAL RESOURCE PERMIT CONDITIONS - Apply to the ! Permits: COASTAL EROSION MANAGEMENT; WATER QU~ CERTIFICATION; EXCAVATION & FILL IN NAVIGABLE WATI WETLANDS 1. Conformance With Plans All activities authorized by this permit must be in strict with the approved plans submitted by the applicant or applicant's agent as part of the pet Such approved plans were prepared by the applicant and/or an authorized representative 2. In-kind, In-place Repair or Reconstruction Existing bulkheads, walkways and sh structures that were functioning at the time of the storm damage may be repaired or recc kind and in-place &the existing structures. No expansion or seaward extension of bulk? shoreline structures is authorized by this permit. 3. Repairs to Structures All repairs to existing structures shall be confined to replace elements with no change in design, dimension or materials, unless specifically authorize 4. Stairway Design The stairs and landings shall be a maximum of 4 feet in width and minimum of 3 feet above grade over the dune/bluff face. Page 2 of 6 t strict Bart of this '.012 ollowing kLITY iRS; TIDAL onformance mit application. )reline erosion astructed in- cads or nent of existing :l by this permit. constructed a NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION General Permit Number GP-0-12-006 5. Backfilling All peripheral berms, cofferdams, rock revetments, seawalls, gabions, bulkheads or other approved shoreline stabilization structures shall be completed prior to placement of any fill material behind such structures. 6. Equipment Operation Equipment operation below the high tide line is strictly prohibited. The storage of construction equipment and materials shall be confined to the project work area and areas more than 100 feet from the high tide line. 7. Sanitary Systems This permit does not authorize filling or re-grading of exposed sanitary systems. Landowners must apply for separate permits to perform repairs or reconstruction to sanitary systems. 8. Hydraulically-filled Sandbags, Sand Cubes and Geotubes Hydraulically-filled sandbags, sand cubes and geotubes are strictly prohibited. 9. Beach Excavation Prohibited for Fill Excavation of the beach or dune for the purpose of obtaining fill material is prohibited. Sandbags may not be filled using sand from the beach or dune areas. Sandbags must be filled with clean sand; no debris or deleterious materials are allowed. 10. Sandbag and Sand Cube Installation Sandbags and sand cubes must be installed no more than four rows deep and a maximum of three rows high. !1. Removal of Sandbags and Sand Cubes Sandbags and sand cubes must be removed within 120 days of installation, or a separate DEC permit to allow the structures to remain permanently must be obtained. 12. Tidal Wetland Vegetation There shall be no disturbance or damage to vegetated tidal wetlands or dune vegetation as a result of the work performed under this permit. All necessary precautions must be taken to prevent damage or disturbance to these vegetated areas. 13. Construction Debris All construction debris shall be cleaned up at the end of each work day and disposed properly. No debris is permitted in tidal waters or the beach areas. 14. Asian Longhorned Beetles Any tree debris within New York City, Nassau or Suffolk counties shall be disposed of by chipping to less than 1 inch in any two dimensions, then used as mulch, erosion control, building agent, or fuel. Wood may only be moved from Asian Longhomed Beetle quarantine areas under a permit from the NYS Department of Agriculture and Markets (http://www.agriculture.ny.gov/PI/alb.html). 15. Least Terns and Piping Plovers All recovery and repair work occurring in open, sandy beach areas must cease on March 31,2013 to protect potential habitat for Least Tern and Piping Plover, unless otherwise authorized in writing by the Department. 16. No Dredging or Excavation No dredging, excavating or other alteration of shoreline or underwater areas is authorized by this permit, nor shall issuance of this permit be construed to suggest that the Department will issue a permit for such activities in the future. 17. No Interference With Navigation There shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation by the work herein authorized. Page 3 of 6 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Geueral Permit Number GP-0-12-006 18. State Not Liable for Damage The State of New York shall in no case be liable for injury to the structure or work herein authorized which may be caused by or result from operations undertaken by the State for the conservation or improvement of navigation, o~ purposes, and no claim or right to compensation shall accrue from any such damage. 19. State May Order Removal or Alteration of Work If future operations by the Sta! require an alteration in the position of the structure or work herein authorized, or if, in th Department of Environmental Conservation it shall cause unreasonable obstruction to th, navigation of said waters or flood flows or endanger the health, safety or welfare of the State, or cause loss or destruction of the natural resources of the State, the owner may be Department to remove or alter the structural work, obstructions, or hazards caused theret expense to the State, and if, upon the expiration or revocation of this permit, the structur, excavation, or other modification &the watercourse hereby authorized shall not be com owners, shall, without expense to the State, and to such extent and in such time and man Department of Environmental Conservation may require, remove all or any portion of th structure or fill and restore to its former condition the navigable and flood capacity ofth~ No claim shall be made against the State of New York on account of any such removal 20. State May Require Site Restoration lfupon the expiration or revocation of this p, project hereby authorized has not been completed, the applicant shall, without expense to such extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental Conser' lawfully require, remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and resto~ former condition. No claim shall be made against the State of New York on account of~ removal or alteration. 21. Precautions Against Contamination of Waters All necessary precautions shall b~ preclude contamination of any wetland or waterway by suspended solids, sediments, fue lubricants, epoxy coatings, paints, concrete, leachate or any other environmentally delet~ associated with the project. WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION SPECIFIC CONDITI 1. Water Quality Certification The NYS Department of Environmental Conservatio~ that the subject project will not contra¥one effluent limitations or other limitations or sm Sections 301,302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (PL 95-217) provk conditions listed herein are met. any damage or hture for other : of New York : opinion of the : free eople of the ordered by the y without :, fill, ,leted, the ter as the : uncompleted : watercourse. alteration. 'mit, the the State, and 'ation may e the site to its ny such taken to s, solvents, rious materials ~)NS hereby certifies adards under ed that all of the GENERAL CONDITIONS - Apply to ALL Authorized Perm its: 1. Facility Inspection by The Department The permitted site or facility, including re is subject to inspection at reasonable hours and intervals by an authorized representative Department of Environmental Conservation (the Department) to determine whether the complying with this permit and the ECL. Such representative may order the work susp~ to ECL 71- 0301 and SAPA 401(3). Page 4 of 6 evant records, ofthe )ermitteeis nded pursuant NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION General Permit Number GP-0-12-006 The permittee shall provide a person to accompany the Department's representative during an inspection to the permit area when requested by the Department. A copy of this permit, including all referenced maps, drawings and special conditions, must be available for inspection by the Department at all times at the project site or facility. Failure to produce a copy of the permit upon request by a Department representative is a violation of this permit. 2. Relationship of this Permit to Other Department Orders and Determinations Unless expressly provided for by the Department, issuance of this permit does not modify, supersede or rescind any order or determination previously issued by the Department or any of the terms, conditions or requirements contained in such order or determination. 3. Applications For Permit Renewals, Modifications or Transfers The permittee must submit a separate written application to the Department for permit renewal, modification or transfer of this permit. Such application must include any forms or supplemental information the Department requires. Any renewal, modification or transfer granted by the Department must be in writing. Submission of applications for permit renewal, modification or transfer are to be submitted to: RegionalPermitAdministrator 625 Broadway Albany, NY 12233-1750 4. Submission of Renewal Application The permittee must submit a renewal application at least 30 days before permit expiration for the following permit authorizations: Tidal Wetlands, Excavation & Fill in Navigable Waters, Water Quality Certification, Coastal Erosion Management. 5. Permit Modifications, Suspensions and Revocations by the Department The Department reserves the right to exercise all available authority to modify, suspend or revoke this permit. The grounds for modification, suspension or revocation include: a. materially false or inaccurate statements in the permit application or supporting papers; b. failure by the permittee to comply with any terms or conditions of the permit; c. exceeding the scope of the project as described in the permit application; d. newly discovered material information or a material change in environmental conditions, relevant technology or applicable law or regulations since the issuance of the existing permit; e. noncompliance with previously issued permit conditions, orders of the commissioner, any provisions of the Environmental Conservation Law or regulations of the Department related to the permitted activity. 6. Permit Transfer Permits am transferrable unless specifically prohibited by statute, regulation or another permit condition. Applications for permit transfer should be submitted prior to actual transfer of ownership. Page 5 of 6 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION General Permit Number GP-0-12-006 NOTIFICATION OF OTHER PERMITTEE OBLIGATIOi Item A: Permittee Accepts Legal Responsibility and Agrees to Indemnification The permittee, excepting state or federal agencies, expressly agrees to indemnify and hc Department of Environmental Conservation of the State of New York, its representative and agents ("DEC") for all claims, suits, actions, and damages, to the extent attributable permittee's acts or omissions in connection with the permittee's undertaking of activitie~ with, or operation and maintenance of, the facility or facilities authorized by the permit compliance or not in compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit. This inde not extend to any claims, suits, actions, or damages to the extent attributable to DEC's o intentional acts or omissions, or to any claims, suits, or actions naming the DEC and ari Article 78 of the New York Civil Practice Laws and Rules or any citizen suit or civil ri under federal or state laws. Item B: Permittee's Contractors to Comply with Permit The permittee is responsible for informing its independent contractors, employees, age their responsibility to comply with this permit, including all special conditions while acl permittee's agent with respect to the permitted activities, and such persons shall be subj~ sanctions for violations of the Environmental Conservation Law as those prescribed for Item C: Permittee Responsible for Obtaining Other Required Permits The permittee is responsible for obtaining any other permits, approvals, lands, easemenl way that may be required to carry out the activities that are authorized by this permit. Item D: No Right to Trespass or Interfere with Riparian Rights This permit does not convey to the permittee any right to trespass upon the lands or inte riparian rights &others in order to perform the permitted work nor does it authorize the any rights, title, or interest in real or personal property held or vested in a person not a permit. Page 6 of 6 Id harmless the employees, to the in connection ~hether in nnification does ~n negligent or :ing under hts provision :s and assigns of ing as the ct to the same the permittee. and rights-of- :re with the impairment of arty to the EUGENE L. DANERI, JR. 1065 I~'~%Xc~KI~Ny 11952-0917 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1~14 For IlO ~ ~hO?q ~ ~:"'h ~ ~'"0 5q DESCRIPTION EXIST. HOUSE EXIST. HOUSE EXIST, CAR PORT TOTAL EXIST. EXISTING AREA LOT COVE~4GE D~TA 820 sq. ft. g.o~ 1,142 sq. ff. 2.BX 186 sq. fi. O,4X SWS sq. ft, 0.9X 2.478 sq. ft. 6.1~ 89'08'00" E EDGE PROPOSED OESCRIPTION AREA HOUSE PORCHES) 5,5S7 sq, ff. PROPOSED GARAGE 864 sq. ff. PROPOSED sq. VACANT PRIVATE RIGHT OF WA Y 2013 Z SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITUATED AT MATTITUCK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK S.C. TAX No. 1000-123-06-14 SCALE 1"=30' JUNE 20, 2006 JULY 18, 2006 ADDED PROPOSED ADDITIONS OCTOBER 25, 2006 REVISED PER SUFFOLK ENVIRONMENTAL LETfER DATED 9/7/06 5, 2007 REVISED PER SUFFOLK ENVIRONMENTAL LETTER RECIEVED 12/27/06 MARCH 28, 2007 ADDED PROPOSED WATER LiNE JULY 25, 2007 REVISED AS PER TOWN AUGUST 16, 2007 REVISED PROP. HOUSE & GARAGE APRIL 5, 2015 UPDATE SURVEY AREA = 40,505.94 sq. ff- (TO TIE LINE) O.9'RO OC. CERTIFIED TO: EUGENE DANEEI NOTES: I, ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.G.V.D. 1929 DATUM EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS:~m EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS: ..... 5- - 2. ANY WETLANO BOUNDARIES SHOWN ARE SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION BY NEW YORK STATE AND/OR OTHER REGULATORY AGENCIES. 5. MINIMUM SEPTIC TANK CAPACITIES FOR $ BEDROOM HOUSE IS 1,000 GALLONS. 1 TANK; B' LONG, 4'-5" WIDE, 6'-7" DEEP 4. MINIMUM LEACHING SYSTEM FOR S REDROOM HOUSE IS 250 sq ff SIDEWALL AREA. 5 POOLS; 2' OEEP, 6' dia. ~ PROPOSED EXPANSION POOL PROPOSED LEACHING POOL ~ PROPOSED SEPTIC TANK 5. THE LOCATION OF WELLS AND CESSPOOLS SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM FIELD OBSERVATIONS AND/OR DATA OBTAINED FROM OTHERS. 6. THE EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM IS TO BE PUMPED CLEAN AND EITHER REMOVED OR FILLED WITH CLEAN SAND AS PER S.C.D.N,S. SPECIFICATIONS. 7. FLO00 ZONE INFORMATION TAKEN FROM: FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP No. 56105C0482 G ZONE AR: 8ASR FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINED ZONE VE: COASTAL FLOOD WITH VELOCITY HAZARD (WAVE ACTION); BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINED ZONE X: AREAS OF 500-yEAR FLOOD; AREAS OF 1DO-YEAR FLOOD WITH AVERAGE DEPTH OF LESS THAN 1 FOOT OR WITH DRAINAGE AREAS LESS THAN 1 SQUARE MILE; AND AREAS PROTECTED 9Y LEVEES FROM 1OD-YEAR FLOOD. 8, B' DIA X 4' DEEP DRYWELLS WiTH ROOF LEADERS: 0 TEST HOLE DATA TEST H( ----8 N3 S 84-'29 5,6 67.1B GREAT ?EcoNIC ZONE AE (EL 8) ZONE VE (EL 8) HAY H~MSE PROPOSED SEPTIC SYSTEM DETAIL SAND Nathan Taft Corw,n III Land Surveyor Successor To: Stanley d, Isakaen, Jr, L.S. Joseph A. Ingegno L.S. Title Surveys -- Subdivisions -- Site P/OhS -- Construction Loyout PHONE (651)727-2060 Fox (E31)727-1727 N,Y.S. Lic. No. 50467 THE EXISTENCE OF RIGHT OF WAYS AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD, IF ANY. NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED.