Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-117.-8-18
P ONIC LAND T ST May 28, 2008 Patricia Firmegan, Town Attorney Town of Southold P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: New Suffolk Waterfront Project JUN - 4 2008 SCTM It 1000-117-08-18 * First and Main Street, New Suffolk, NY Defining the regulatory parameters of the Town'Of Southold Dear Ms. Finnegan: Thank you for meeting with Barbara Schnitzler of the New Suffolk Waterfront Committee, our consultant Valerie M. Scopaz, AICP, and myself. As discussed, the purpose of this letter is to provide you and other Town staff (Michael Verity, Jamie Richter, Heather Lanza and Melissa Spiro) with a synopsis of our questions and understandings, along with supporting documentation in defense of our conceptual proposal. By way of background, in 2006, the New Suffolk Waterfront Committee (NSWC) retained the Peconic Land Trust (Trust) to negotiate with the owners of the New Suffolk Waterfront Project on its behalf. The Love Lane Acquisition Corp. sold the 5.5 acre site to the Trust in December 2007 under a bargain sale agreement. The Trust bought the property to protect scenic vistas, allow for community use of the property, and acknowledge the property's historic value. Prior to the purchase, the Trust had initiated a number of meetings with the Town Board (in Executive Session) to discuss the potential role the Town might play in the acquisition, ownership and management of the site. At that time, the Town Board voiced strong support for the site's acquisition by the Trust. It also advocated re-use of the site in accordance with the preferences of the New Suffolk community. In response, the Trust and the NSWC hosted two community outreach meetings to determine the community's ownership and land use preferences for the Project site. 296 HAMPTON ROAD I P.O. BOX 1776 I SOUTHAMPTON, NY 11969 I TEL: 631.283.3195 I FAX: 631.204.0711 www. peconiclandtrust.org P ONIC LAND Tt ST The synopsis of findings outlined here are a direct result of two community outreach meetings conducted in February and April of 2008. Findings The New Suffolk community wishes to revitalize the site in keeping with the goals of the Town's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, yet to do so within clearly defined parameters, which are described, in part, below. go The community would like to re-instate the following historic uses of the site, all of which were pre-existing at one time: restaurant/snack bar, boat basin, and post office with attached coffee shop/newspaper stand. The community would like to introduce open space/park facilities which would provide public waterfront access: such as a youth sailing center, and a place where a club might meet and community-oriented events might occur (along the lines of The Wharf House at Founders Landing). These uses would be housed in the existing restaurant building and a smaller club-house which could be relocated to the site from another location. The community would like to create a small museum/submarine memorial pertaining to the site's history (as the first U.S. submarine base) in the existing storage barn. The community would like to keep the marina or boat basin use intact, meaning the retention of boat slips and associated infrastructure (e.g. water, electricity, security) for servicing permanent and some transient boats. This use would likely include a ramp and/or small lift and limited upland boat storage for slip renters. To sum up, the community's intent is to re-instate some of the historic uses of the property, but with reduced potential for future development and intensities of use as is currently permitted by the Marine II zoning district. The site will be revitalized in keeping with the goals of the Town's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. Next Steps The Trust, in conjunction with the NSWC, is formulating a potential ownership/management strategy for the future use of the site. Because of the low likelihood of Town funding to re-vitalize this site, both the NSWC and the Trust are 296 HAMPTON ROAD I P.O. BOX 1776 I SOUTHAMPTON, NY 11969 I TEL: 631.283.3195 I FAX: 631.204.0711 www.peconiclandtrust.org P ONIC LAND TI ST committed to taking on the financial and administrative burdens of revitalizing and managing this site. However, our ability to engage potential partners and raise the necessary funds will be compromised without clear direction from the Town about the regulatory parameters within which the community's vision for this property may be realized. We discussed our concerns regarding these regulatory parameters, and these are noted below. It is our understanding that the restaurant had been verbally acknowledged by the Building Department as being a legal non-conforming use when the property was under the ownership of the Love Lane Acquisition Corporation. At this meeting, Michael Verity indicated that the Trust had two years from either the cessation of operation (as a restaurant) or the close of litigation between the prior owner and their tenant. If this deadline has been missed, the Trust will have to petition the Zoning Board of Appeals for permission to re-instate a Special Exception use. However, the Trust would like the Town to consider extending (as a courtesy to the community) the two year exemption period starting from the day the Trust will actually obtain possession of the property, on May 31, 2008, as per the terms of the contract of sale. The post office and coffee shop-news stand were pre-existing, non- conforming uses at the time the building housing those uses burned to the ground in 1993. The structure and its uses are noted in the Town's SPLIA inventory (Society for the Protection of Long Island Antiquities) for the Project site. The entire site qualifies for local landmark designation. And, there is a strong possibility the site will qualify for state and national landmark designation, as per discussions with the Chairman of the Town's Landmark Preservation Commission, James Grathwohl. Since landmark designation runs with the land, and can be tied, to some extent, to its uses, the community would like the Town to recognize the post-office/coffee shop- news-stand use as part of this site's historic character. The proposed "new" public access uses (essentially open space, scenic overlooks, a youth sailing program to be operated out of a small club-house, beach access, and a small museum in the storage barn) are considered accessory uses to the principal use of a non-profit, waterfront-oriented 296 HAMPTON ROAD I P.O. BOX 1776 I SOUTHAMPTON, NY 11969 I TEL: 631.283.3195 I FAX: 631.204.0711 www.peconiclandt rust .org PI ONIC LAND TI ST membership organization, which would own and oversee the operation and maintenance of the entire site including the boat basin/marina. The permitted sanitary loading (pursuant to the Suffolk County Department of Health approval) will accommodate the desired mix of uses described here, provided the pre-existing restaurant is scaled down from 98 seats (of which 40 are outside for seasonal use only) to a lower number of seats. The SCDHS will allow these uses so long as the maximum permitted sanitary loading is not exceeded. Michael Verity indicated that the inside seating must be equal to (or less than) the previously approved seating as per fire code regulations. We see no problem with this inasmuch as the community's intent is to downscale the intensity of the restaurant use. Land can be set aside for the purposes of adding drainage and additional parking spaces along First Street in accordance with the Town's long-term stormwater remediation plans for the neighborhood. We also see no obstacles towards granting the Town an easement to maintain the existing underground pipe and drainage system at the northern border of the site. The use of a planning tool, such as the Planned Development District concept, was suggested by the Town as a mechanism whereby this non- traditional re-development proposal could be implemented. However, the Town's Zoning Code does not contain this enabling legislation. This fact, coupled with the fiscal and administrative time-frame within which this project must be completed, suggests that absent other as-yet undefined solutions, the project may have to be brought to the Zoning Board of Appeals for action. Conclusions The NSWC has evinced a strong desire to create a partnership with the Trust to finance, operate and maintain the premises as a community-based endeavor; and further, to accomplish this vision with little or no financial support by the Town. Revitalization of the site (specifically, providing public benefit within a cost- effective, non-profit framework without an extensive investment of public funds) will be undertaken in accordance with the goals of the Town's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, which are attached for your review, and which highlight the need for increased public access (not ownership) to the waterfront. Achieving this vision will require creative regulatory problem-solving. In return, the Trust and 296 HAMPTON ROAD t P.O. BOX 1776 I SOUTHAMPTON, NY 11969 I TEL: 631.283.3195 I FAX: 631.204.0711 www. peconiclandtrust.org PI ONIC LAND TI ST the NSWC are prepared to discuss the imposition of permanent restrictions on the potential uses (and/or intensity of uses) that will be allowed to take place on the site. The Town's willingness to be a regulatory partner ultimately will shape the extent to which the community's vision can be realized. Without regulatory cooperation, much of this vision will have to be set aside. As discussed, the Trust is operating within a tight time schedule. It must settle on a feasible ownership/management strategy this summer in order to raise funds and find viable partners by the close of 2008. In order to solicit viable partnerships in good faith the Trust must have absolute clarity about the regulatory requirements that will be imposed by various Town Departments. Permits from the Trustees and the Suffolk County Department of Health are in hand. And we are working with the NYSDEC to finalize a permit to rehabilitate the existing infrastructure around the boat basin. I look forward to meeting with you again within the next couple of weeks to review your team's findings. Enclosed is supporting documentation from the Town's LWRP document, as well as the SPLIA documentation and a aerial of the site. In the meantime, if you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me at (631) 283-3195. Sincerely, Stephen Searl Encs. Lwrp, splia papers, aerial Cc: Lanza, Richter, Spiro, Verity, Supervisor Russell and Members of the Town Board, Barbara $chnitzler, NSWC 296 HAMPTON ROAD I P.O. BOX 1776 I SOUTHAMPTON, NY 11969 I TEL: 631.283.3195 I FAX: 631.204.0711 www. peconiclandtrust.org Supporting Documentation Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Section II. J. A. 7. New opportunities for public access and recreation provision (p 12) "There is little bay front left in Reach 8, and only slightly more creekffont. Accordingly, the Town should be open to a public/private partnership to acquire the 3.5 acre Harbor Inn Marina/restaurant property at the foot of Main Street in New Suffolk in order to establish a wider range of public recreational uses within New Suffolk. The use of this property could be combined with private investment to effect a revitalization of New Suffolk's waterfront that is in keeping with the scale of this community." Section II. J. B.l.(iii) Underutilized sites (pp 32-33) "The Town of Southold has identified underutilized sites within Reach 8. One privately- owned parcel in particular, adjacent to Captain Marty's (formerly known as the Marina Bay Club site), is considered underutilized and in need of revitalization. This 3.5 acre site once housed the Holland Torpedo Company, which designed and built some of the first submarines ever built in the United States. Previous redevelopment proposals have been dropped due to potential environmental problems and constraints on the site. Redevelopment action in this area should seek to maintain the marine-related character of the New Suffolk waterfront and the continuance of water-dependent uses, but at a scale appropriate to the community. Future development also should be consistent with the property's Marine II zoning designation. Towards that end, the New Suffolk Civic Association has drawn up preliminary land use plans to be used as a guide for interested developers. The plans call for a mix of public and private uses, which would permit shoreftont access but also help to maintain the tax base within the school district. The plan calls for rebuilding the post office and general store in their former locations near the intersection of New Suffolk Avenue and 1st Street. This Plan also suggests land uses that will not cause excessive amounts of automobile traffic or other adverse environmental impacts. Total public or public-private acquisition of the 3.5 acre property are two options that could lead to the revitalization of this waterfront. A third options is for the Town to accept a donation of all or part of the site from the owner...." Section V Implementation. (p 66) "Reach 8: Revitalization of New Suftblk Waterfront and Community Development - Work with community to develop and implement." LWRP Goals furthered by implementing this project: 3. 9. 10. Foster a pattem of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. Preserve historic resources of the Town of Southold. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water- dependent uses in suitable locations. BuILDING'STRUCTURE 'ENTORY FORM -.,~ .. i)~VISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION .~h~>,, [%~,~ UNIQUE'~ITE NO .... . . :.,-. ~.:~,~Z 'QUAD " ' ~-" ' - :' -. '- NEW YOrK STATE PARKS AND RECREATION ,'~" ~,i, ALBANY NEW YORK (S 8 4740479 - ":~ ~,:~ 'SERIES' ' - · " '-.- - - ,, ~' ----, ..... ~'~'DATE December 23.' lq8~ ' -'". ' .~',~ ', ORGANIZATION (i~.~):~outhold~To~n-go~unit~ ~elo~ent Office ~'.. ~-,'~.] '-~ . , ~ ~.,~.~ ~ ........~&.. ~.. ~.~ .. . .... . , . ;- ~RUCTURAL - a w ' · · ' '' ' ~-~'~', ~'~' , .... ' - ' lO, CONDITION: "~. excellent ~ :' ~. good ~ ' ~ fa r ~" ;:;' V"" ' ",,%'~,'?'f::.["~.fi'~'~'~[t~["olher bevelopers proposed to.movekbuild~g~ :" ,'-.;' :"., ,:.,--". '- · I~. ' ~EL~TE~ O~!~ISC~ ~?~o~[~ff~e~ it. ~o ~,...~.....~.:.~ ;?,~:g ·: : ' ' = ' ~ ' ' c "t':,'~'cd ~17;:~':~7~'1: b~rn ~.:%&~b': e~rt age hous~ ~ 2.~x garag~-,~$~i~kr,~ ~ ' "~ .... ' ~ '~ ': ~: ::.~'~..~H~ ~4;~.t:~~ ~',' ~'~a,'Sv' 'J~' _~,%~1~.:=~. ~, ?~-'--.::~>: :~:~:.~C??~"::" . · v.~...'.", .' ?.': ".?h.'~.'*~,. ''**,.'~"~ " ~ '*-.':',: ', ' ' ifnece~ :f~:l' · . .-,. : . , ,, .~,o,~u~v~ ~p T~ RUlLDIN~(~eck more than one . .~ ~,.,~., ,. W.~. .... · --. ,. .2.~- ~ ,' a.o , . ~Q, wo~land~...~ ..,..,., ,..:..~,. ..~: ...... .:..~.-~ ( .~[~.~ ~J...:~, , e~,x, ~...,,~ . ~ ,,X~, - ,~ ...... ~,..:~.~.,~.. ,' ...... :'~','.,')-.:~, '=: ' ' ~' ' - S Point. ': -- ..- .- ..,~ ..... .:, .,, ,~ , ......... ,[~ · offers a ~t~w o e ~ ~ .. t~ , ,.~,~....~-'t-a,~,~: ~7 .~INTERR~ION~IP..OF.~UILDING AND SU~O~DiN~.. ~.~ , ~ .~% .~ .':"-. ~:--The restaurant faces the h~bor and its docks, ~en ~no ".-,,- --the area 'in which i~ is located has lost m~ of i~s :":-.'?~ - ' ;' ."~'. ildi s'~.%he [area is ~ctive with stron~ evidence of work -., · :,.:- ¢ '-.:.,. :~-%~ :...There'~e boa%s~ docked on shore as.well as in ~he water. ....' :':'":'~"~"-"::'.:'"~s "~' Uniquely beautiful .ett[~ ~,~c~, ~e.d~. care~u! ' ." ,~t;,,~he Oalley-Ho Restaurant fi~s ~oo~el~ in~o .a:,cluste~. . ..' ;: ..:~ ~ith the Po~t. Office . and.,~Hous~o~' s. o~n.,.., '[ [f j:; ..' :..... :. ~..~.:~ ~ff~,~ -, · :~.~ ~j~i.:i.,:,';-': t.:.,;' ~,~." ~,It?,~/:/'c'..~'4 ~.~ .~. '~,~ , ',, ,~ . .' .: ..,.- . , .' ...."' .~9. a-DATE OF INITIAL CONSTR~TION: n~ra~ 1890 :~ ~:~[ .... ..... , ' ~,?'r~'d,~-~: ..: ~ . '~?-,~ ~:~'.~;-, r~.-~,..~ -,~.~ ~ ~0 ~ ~., .~ A~ ' ~' ~."~ ~..e ' ,'~ ~?:iRO" TFOT' ' · ,-T~- t'9'f..1~z ............. ~'~" "': ~ ................ , "' ' ""~;'~-~ ~UILDER: "'' =' ..... I' .... '" ......... ~ 20. "-'HI~TORICA L AND ARCHITECTURAL IM~RTANCE: "-'-' "'~-"' feature' '6f :~he ~alleya~o~'He"2aurant is an ~he "New Suffolk waterfront, In terms of $t~ social function,. - since [2 ts a popular gathering place and because its . ~h[tec2ural charac2er blends into the 1oca1 atmoophete,. ~ s2ovy, gab~' '~oof, red shingle structure with porch on east and modern flat roof extension on sguth, C:." ' .. '. 21. SO~RCtS~u~go~orgh~ ~arJor[~ ~oor~, ~h~ ~ew 8uffolk'8~or~ Greenmrt 1983.P. 34 ' . "~,':i-"'?~' · Blaikte, ~. Conversation Dec.' 3, 1985 · ~, . - . ~F.. ',. . '" =?'; ,..' ;'. . ~.. . .... . .. ~ILDING-STRUCTURE I FOR OFFICE USWNLY NS-30 ~IENTORY FORM " ~C..~.~' ~ ' , ,-7'"'~': ~IQUE'SITE NO. ~ ' ' ~ ,," · ~" 'b~vlb,ON FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION ~'-:t:-',' ~.A~ :~c- '- - ..".'~'.~ N~ YORK STATE PARKS AND RECREAT ON '~,..:,c' :.. ;. ~ -',~ , , .~ . - . . ~' - . YOUR NAME~A'O~ OX ~OU~O~/~A .~ ' '. DATE~ ~_- ~.~ " · YOUR ADDR~S' ~0~ ffSll~ ~tn Rosd '"IELEPHONE~"~I~/~o9 ' ,<, . -' Southold L; I.; N.Y. 11971 , v.;::;:~~:.~:_.. ORGANIZATION (if.ny):Southold TO~ Co.unity DeVelopment Office .'.'"' '..?'~.. '.' "~ ":' ,.t ", ~.'., ~'; :;~'~.rSg,.~,, ~,'~"':.~ ~,%~' ~'~ ' ~; ~ ' ' V "~'~'"' t~.., .~',.~ ..: . ,,,..:~:.'-~3..~: .: m~u.nNGN~Er~V H~ston s Barn .'. ,~,,r~' ,. ~t.:r,.,:2...~.~:. ...... ,c. ;. ~..,';,.c:, · 3. STREET L~ATION:E~ of First Stree~.':behind '%he Post Off ici 4. OWNERStlIP: .-. a. public ~ .:".~,'b prvate ~ ~.:'~L.:~::~;'4c~ga'~;i~:,~,*.' ~,~ 1.";.". -'~:'g~,~ . 5 PRaSE~ O~ER 'Arthur Ke~tft ~ ~-i~ADDRE~: :~Sou%hold · ~.', .. 6 USE Orgn, .... .. ...... ~ ......... Preen, *~Or~O ':'*.~[~ ..... 7. ACC~SIBILITY TO PUBLIC :.~.{~ Exter,or vis,hie from pubhc roaU. yes E.~.N~).~.,~ -. '-0.~'[~,. ~ .......... ~. .... .. ...~.- DESCRIPTION - ~d ~-h.~ :, ).0 '. , ....!,~.~;~O:d~r~4,~f..,~d4r ' '. , ~..' ' .8. BUILDING . .... .a. clapboard ~ . b. ~tone ~'-J'r~: brick ~ .~c(dl.h6ard a~d batten ~ .; , .. : , MAT :R AL' 't :' .Ce :cobb es one ~ f sh n~es ~ 'g stuceo ~ .'~ ot~er.':'~[~:~t)¢~.~..' · z ~RUCTURAL -'. '-'a. Wood ~rame with inlerl~king joints ~ ~ '*'.a '~., ':-~,~...=~x"~,.~ '." " SYSTEM: : b. wooa r~am~ with li~t memb~,s ~ · ~-....' '~.~:i[~r~}~4~.~g:~-~.* (if km~n) ::'- : c. mason~ loadbearing walls ~ '':' '* ['' ' 14' : ~ ~'~er~ ~ ..... . . · ~ :'d. melal (explain) ' " · ~ · -., '~:'~g.~',,-:'.~' · -. ....- e. Olher ; .' :, , '~-"-' -''-'- ~' ' IO. CONDITION: a. excellent ~ b. good ~ c. fair ~ d, deteriorated ~ :,-.~ :~.i~";.'L:: :';'" I I. INTEGRITY: a. original sJl~ ~ b, moved ~ ff so.when? ' "::~"'~' "'~:' ":: c ~sl major a leratlons and dates fie knownl' . - ', ~t~ ~";'-. , .... - ............ :.~ ......~... ~ ......... ~-~.~a ~ ................... ~~,~. ........ , ,~-~ ~,~.~ ..... , . · , ; -,',~ .- ~..-~ ~ ~=~.~.~; · ..~?,a.: .~"..... .-;. ,, ., ~e ~ 12. PHOTO.. NS=rsm IV-g ' . :,-:~... :..la: M~: N.Y.S. ~T South~uad ~' : .. Prom ~he eas~ I' .'~ 'al ,.:::'.,"~'~,' ', i -:- BUILDING-STRUCTURE I~ENTORY FORM $ .... " D-IVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESER~/ATION t i! NEW YORK STATE PARKS AND RECREATION' ALIIANY, NEWYORK (5181474-0479 ~ '"L.":: .' FOR OFFICE USE ONLY UNIQUESITE 'QUAD SERIES NEG. NO. 1 I I I I I I I I YoUR NAME:TOWn of So~th61d,_PLIA '"' : DATE: December'2 _ __ __Wn .,_ _ ' ' ~rEl~Ei, tl~31~E:S16/?651iS0 ~. YOUR ADDRESS: TO }[all! l~l. in Ro~ · · ~ou~nox~, L.I., N.Y. 11971 _.'"..' ..... .-~ ;.- . .'. ORG'ANIZATiON (if any):Southold ~O~ Co~untt~ Development 'office ........ . ' · .. ' ....... ' "~f"..-'e~...~-- · :~,~.--~. · 9,~'.~. · :.,% , ~.c..=. t. BUILDING NAMEIS): ~OSt Off~ce .~ Goldsnith-Tut~ill.-Buildin~ ,.;,:~,.', · '.- · 2. COUNTY. S~ffolR ~ ' "' ..TO~/CI~: Sol,hold .... ~LLAGE:NeW 4. OWNERStlIP: :2~a.'public ~...~:G'~'~ private. ~ ..:~' :;5,"." '. :~ ~;~' ~ · 6. USE: Original: 8~* ~ ~8~ nff[e~ '.wP~nt.~ ,~ · :7. ~CCESS[BILIIY:.. ~. 10 ~UBLIC:~} E~t~rio~ ~i~ibl~ fi~m public_ ~m~ ~ ~ ~ ~. '~: *~:~kYx----% t' InleDor accessible:' ~ DESCRIPTION .... '~.gJl ': '.c -. · ..... ,' ,' t .... , .' =~ ,~.,~ "' ' '~ ~ ..... brick d.I 8. BUILDIN(;. . . a. capboard~ ~ }'b~16n~'~''' ~* ff. '* '' '' ~' ~c' . ~ . "" MATERIAL[''-t e. cobbles~ohe ~ L shinglis.~ g. stucc6 ~'gbthei~e~tical '.st~ing" . :,'.:':. 9. STRUCTURAL a. wood frame wsth mterl~kmgjomts ~ · .~ - :'~:ff,~" ,'i'~'~-'":. :' , ' ,' · SYSTEM: .. ,- b. wgod flame with It~t members ~..~,',, .:... , ;'.'~:~'{~':~:;~:j~ 7 ~:'.'"'".-' ' ' '. · · fi- ~. ,d. racial {explain) ' · ' . . · ~ ~, ~.? ' , ....: e. other :ounda~ton oar$ briog, oart. concrete ",V~:~" 10. CONDITION: . a. e~cellent ~ ... b~ g~d ~ c. fair ~ - ~. fletenorated I I. INTEGRITY: a. original sile ~' b. 'move~ ~ 'if ~,when? ~-- '~-- -'~e~-~'~i~.:~;~.. i ... ., -.c...~;.[ C-';'::' [' .l~/~jo[,al~?io~s aqd 4ate,,(if known): ...... : ' ' ":'~:';:i:~ , : ': '~ ~-" '=';';'..'; ' k'~,-"J's.3y':-g; ;""4--'~ .:. :.: ~,,~ ':'~"- '.::.~'.~k';.55eg.'~ ', '--'.., ~,.-: c':'- . ; The buildt~ burned do~ in 1872 ~d was ~~ · :~.~,.-.> ,. ~' rebuilt in 1873 -.' ..... .',~.~'.~z= ...... 12. ,~vo =~ --- ~, ~ ~ .... -:, · {~ff.~,',~'.~, ..... ~'acaue-xrom the south ;' '. :.;:. ,;'"'. ~* · · ' ' : .. ~ , . ....:...,~::~,.: .... ' · -' 4 THREATS TO BUILDING n - ' .-" '~' , '~" ~ ':-~[~":s' 'land~a~ features.~~>"~.- . .. ...... .16. SURROUNDINGS OE TH~,B~.ILDIN~~; '"'. ': -:'~-~ ;~.= The '~uildi~ ,%ies.~% ~~~reet in_ t~ h~ -' ~- ' ~" area,":wi%h~boa%s' dock~~o~ ~s well .'. ~ ..' .-'.' ' "~ buildi~s,~ ~the =.~ea remains very :active. ~ ....... ... -~;~ .'. '% 18...OTHER ~OT~BLE_FEATURES OF BUILDIN~AND SITE 0~lu~m~nt~nor fe~tu~s ~f -,.:'.SIGNIFICANCE ~ ~ .... .... :.-~'~ =" ~ :. ,'~'~'~, ,~,,- ..... ,~:,:~.?:: ~; =:"~.,,.~'~', ....... 't~' '~,,"~:~~'~':: .... .~.,,...:~ BUILDER. ~f~ ~ ',~-" ~ ' · ' ~'~ --- ~=~.~, HISTORICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL IM~RTANCE: ' .:. ' ' . '"' -"~ ;'~:"= ' Office ~as s~arted in ~he~e premises, and Ira ~u~hil~ was its firs~ ~stmaster. The entrance ~d double leaf door'survive from original 1836 ~,uilding. 2~. SOURC£S: Buttemvorth~ MarJorie ~. Greenport 1983. pp. Pltmpton' E. ,Building-Structure .~2. T,[t, IE: Form prepared by Rosemary Skye Morit~ Assistant. or's e ! The New Suffolk S' 9,10. - , ~ms Skye Morit~:, Res~ .. .... . (cont.) Notable features of BuildinM large glass panes above wood pane~ with typical Greek Revival molding. ~ New Suffolk Bird's Eye Aerial DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE March 1, 2007 Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse, chairperson Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road - Post Office Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Reference: New Suffolk Harbor Inn SCDHS Reference ~[ -~6.-I~00~TM 1000-117-8- 8 M.P.H. COMMISSIONER Enclosure: (1) Application for renewal of an expired permit for the New Suffolk Harbor Inn (2) Revised Application for the New Suffolk Harbor Inn (3) 1st Notice of Incomplete Application dated April 10, 2006 (4) 2nd Notice of Incomplete Application dated August 4, 2006 (5) 3ra Notice of Incomplete Application dated December 1, 2006 (6) 4th Notice of Incomplete Application dated March 1, 2007 (7) One copy of the Site Plan for Harpoon Harry's (Harbor Inn) dated December 21, 2006 I was discussing this application with Mr. Bruno Simon of the town planning department this afternoon and he asked that I forward the enclosed for your use and review. Please contact me with any questions that may arise at 852-5700. Sincerer, (,,/John E. Fitzgerald pEt.~ Public Health Engineer · DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY * OFFICE OF WASTE3NATER MANAGEMENT · 360 YAPHANK AVENUE, SUITE 2C · YAPHANK NY 11980 PHONE (631) 852-5700 FAX (631) 852-5755 SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT O~;ALTH SERVICES For Office OFFICE OF WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT SUFFOLK COUNTY CENTER - RiVERHEAD, NY 11901 Health Department Ref. No. (631)852-2100 ~/O - O ~>- APPLICATION FOR SEWAGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES AND WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS FOR OTHER THAN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES IThis application is for (check all that apply): New Construction [ I Addition to Building [ ] E~tension of Existing Permit I [ Food Establishment Change in Use [ I Revision of Approved Plan [VI Renewal of Expired Permit [ } Other Bfiefly Describe the Proposal And Use(s) ofBuildinl~: ~--~-4,~'~"L ~ ~- ~D'~""~L~c~'~'~*'~D~'- C'~t"~ ~"~'~"~? Name and Address . SECTION 1 Hamlet: Properly Location: N/S/E/W side of Feet N/S/E/W of and ]'-~/~'t t'~ ~'e;~ Tax Map No.: District(s) Section(s) Block(s) Lot(s) WWM-004 (Rev. 12/00) This page intentionally left blank for additional comments Page 4 of 4 qame of Agent (If Not Applicant) Telephone No. ( ) Address: Name of Industrial Park, Subdivision and/or shopping center (if applicable) Gallons Per Day of Sewage Discharge Existing /N'3 Proposed ' 1 Specify Method of Water Supp y. [¢ ] Public [ Town Zoning of parcel Specify Method of Sewage Disposal. ['~Subsurface Disposal (conventional) [ ] Other (explain) WWM-004 (Rev. 12/00) ] Private Well ] Public Sewers Previous HeaLth,Department Reference No(s). perOCcupancy Rating as I T°tal Area °fParce' ] T°tal Gr°ss Fl°°r Area °fBuilding(S)BuildingA Code (Acres,v 1~-~')ProposedExisting ~'"~ ~'?~ Distance To Water M~in & Na~e o~earest Public Water District: 3istance To & Name of Nearest Public Sewer District or Treatment Plant: "-:' (~ L ,: Pagelof4 SECTION 2 FOR CHANGE IN USE OF AN EXISTING BUILDING ONLY. Site & floor plans will be required for review. Previous Naln¢(s), Type af Business and dale last open. Floor Area of Proposed Bus ness FOR FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS ONLY. Type of Seats Bar Restaurant Catering Outdoor NUmber of Seats permitted in Previous Establishment ~ ~ ~ Number of Seats in proposed Establishment ~ 9~ ~ ~ SECTION 3 FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIAL STORAGE OR DISCHARGE YES NO 1. Is or will wastewater, other than sewage, be discharged into the ground? If yes explain ,V/' 2. Is or will oil be stored for heating purposes? If yes, indicate the number, size ofoil tank(s) in gallons & year installed V// 3. Does the business(es) require process tanks or petroleum storage tanks such as gasoline, kerosene, diesel, gasohol, motor oil, antifreeze, or waste oil? V/ If yes, indicate number aboveground & number underground Indicate materials that are being stored 4. Does or will the business(es) have more than 250 gallons of drum storage? If yes, indicate number of drams and amount of gallons V 5. Does or will the business(es) have collection sumps, troughs, floor drains, boiler drains, etc.? If yes explain 6. Does or will the business(es) involve any manufacturing processes or use of any / chemicals? If yes explain If the answer to any of the above questions ~n section 3 are yes, then permit(s) for hazardous material storage or discharge may be necessary in accordance with Article 7 and 12 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code and a separate report may be required. Contact the Office of Pollution Control (631) 854-2501. SECTION 4 OTHER PERMITS REQUIRED YES N 1. Are any of the following permits required? a. Wild Scenic and Recreation Rivers Permit - NYSDEC b. Long Island Well/Water Supply Permit- NYSDEC c. Tidal Wetlands Permit d. Fresh Water Wetlands Permit e. SPDES-D Permit, sanitary waste only - SCDHS/NYSDEC f. SPDES Permit - Industrial Waste - SCDHS/NYSDEC g. Toxic and Hazardous Materials Storage/Handling, Article 12, SCDHS WWM-004 (Rev. 12/00) Page 2 of 4 SECTION 5 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND HEALTH REVIEW YES NO 1. Is the property located within or substantially contiguous to a locally or county designated Critical Environmental Area (CEA) pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) and 6NYCRR 617 (SEQRA)? --2. Is any portion of the subject property in a "Coastal Erosion Hazard Area" (pursuant to 6NYCRR Part 505) or subject to imminent erosion or flooding? If yes, show area on plans and/or explain 3. Is the property located within the area designated Central Pine Barrens Core Preservation Area pursuant to Article 57 of the ECL? 4. Has a determination of Environmental Significance (Negative or Positive Declaration) been issued by any other permitting agency for this project? If yes, provide copy of determination and/or details. 5. Has a determination been made by any other permitting agency that this project is a Type I action pursuant to SEQRA? If yes, explain v 6. Will the completed project routinely produce odors, or operating noise which exceeds the local ambient noise levels? V If yes, explain 7. Has the property ever been used for the disposal of solid waste or hazardous waste? If yes, show area on plans and/or explain V 8. Are there any existing environmental factors which may affect the public health / and safety of the completed project's occupants (for example, neighboring landfills, petroleum spills, toxic materials, noise sources, odors, etc.)? If yes, explain 9. Is the subject property within 100' of any surface water(s) or ~vetland(s)? /' If yes, show on plans. 10. Is the parcel subject to existing covenants or restrictions? If yes, explain 11. Does the project require a change in zoning or a zoning variance? If yes, explain 12. Is there a public water wellfield within 1,500 feet of property boundaries? If yes, show on plans. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE FOR A PERMIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS APPLICATION, SURVEY(S) AND PLAN(S) SUBMITTED. I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION ON ALL THE PAGES OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL THE ATTACHMENTS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY ME AND THAT, BASED ON MY INQUIRIES, SITE INVESTIGATION(S) AND/OR OTHER STUDY(lES), I BELIEVE THAT THE INFORMATION IS TRUE, ACCURATE AND COMPLETE. I UNDERSTAND THAT FALSE STATEMENTS MADE HEREIN ARE PUNISHABLE AS A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR PURSUAN~T.--T-O~ 10.45 OF THE PENAL LAW. Property Owner s~ S i gn aC~im ~.."~_,~:::~~,-'''~ ~// ~5' Print Nam.,e ~ Date ~ ¢-~.o~- Applicant s Signatu~--~,~ PrintName,~,~%A;,.e./ ~,~,_,,,,,.--r/ } . . . . Date fes ional'sSi a' re Design Pro~~ ~_ ~_~_~ ,.~ mnnt Name ~~La~~ ~'~i;~nse# dg-7~.d4~l ~ Date WWM-004 (Rev. 12/00) Page 3 of 4 ¢SiJF~'6'I~K COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF~glEALI~H SERVICES I For Office Use OFFICE OF WASTEWATER ~AGEMENT Health Depa~e~ef. No. 350 YAPHA~ AVE~E, SUITE 2C, Y~H~, ~ 11980 ~/~ (631) 852-5700 APPLICATION FOR SEWAGE DISPOS~ FACILITIES ~D WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS FOR OTHER TH~ SINGLE F~IILY ~SIDENCES IThis application is for (check all that apply): New Construction I ] Addition to Building [ I Extension of Existing Permit [ ] Food Establishment Change in Use [ 1 Revision of Approved Plan [ | Renewal of Expired Permit [ 1 Other Briefly Describe the Proposal And Use(s) of Building: qECTION I ~ Hamlet To,am Business or Facility Name ' . . ' <" /if A,,:,~:',z;.~ i ' ../ "~"1 ~"0';"~ Feet N/S/E/W of Property Location: N/S/EB3/side of .... OR ,~S&'~WComerof~~''' :,fleer .'~ __and //5'}..~,-./ ':.~'.A'¢ ~-.. District(s) Section(s) Block(s) Lot(s) Tax Map No.: ,z ,, :.,,~ .2 ,, i ,f 'v ,.D 1',/~ '~"~'~[-'~hone No. Name'°fApplicanL' I (%'~V) '? ~' 'l-' Address: ' /</ ~/ Name of Desi~ Professional (I[Not Applica~}) . Telephone ~o. ~ddress: / ' .-.- /,t Name of Prope~ 0~er (If Not Applicant) ~ Telephone No. ( ) Address: Telephone No. Name of Agent (If Not Applicant) ( ) kddress: Name of Ndus~ial Park, Subdivision anWor shopping center (if ap~Vious Health Depa~ment Reference No(s). Site is cu~enfly: Town Zoning of Occupancy Rating as Total Area of Parcel (Acres): Topography (Flat, Rolling, Steep, etc.): Vacant ~ Parcel: >er Building Code: Improved ~ ,0;~ ~. /'~ Gallons Per Day of Sewage Discharge: Total Parking Spaces: Number of Stories (in each Building): Total Gross Floor Area of Building(s) , ~ (including all floors and Mezzanine areas). Existing ~ Proposed ~ Existing ~-'1'~ '~ Existing Basement: Ves~ No ~" Exsting ~ 7< 5 Mezzanine: Yes~ No ~ Proposed ~ 7~ ~ Proposed~ Proposed Distance To Water Main & Name of Nearest Public Water District: Specify Method of Water Supply: [;~ublic [ ] Private Well Distance To & Name of Neatest Public Sewer District or Treatment Plant: Specify Method of Sewage Disposal: [-']'gubsurface Disposal (conventional) [ ] Public Sewers [ ] Other (explain) Page I WWM-004(Rev. 05/06) ~ SECTION2 ' FOR CH~SE OF AN EXISTING B~Ly. ~ Site & floor plans will be re~ Previous Name(s), Type &Business and date last open. [ F~oor Area of Proposed Busines~ Const;u'cted FOR FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS ONLY. Type of Seats Restaurant Number of Seats Permitted in Previous Establishment Number of Seats in Proposed Establishment Outdoor ~ SECTION 3 FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIAL STORAGE OR DISCHARGE YE'-"---'~ N'----'~ I. Is or will waste~vater, other than sewage, be discharged into the ground? If yes explain 2. Is or will oil be stored for heating purposes? If yes, indicate the number, size ofoil tank(s) in gallons & year installed 3. Does the business (es) require process tanks or petroleum storage tanks such as gasoline, kerosene, diesel, gasohol, motor oil, antifreeze, or waste oil? If yes, indicate number aboveground _ & number underground Indicate materials that are being stored ' 4. Does or will the business (es) have more than 250 gallons of drum storage? If yes, indicate number of drams and amount &gallons 5. Does or will the business (es) have collection sumps, troughs, floor drains, boiler drains, etc.? If yes explain 6. Does or will the business (es) involve any manufacturing processes or use of any -- chemicals? If yes explain If the answer to any of the above questions in section 3 is yes, then permit(s) for hazardous material stora e or discharge may be necessary in accordance with Article 7 and 12 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code and a separate report may be required. Contact the Office of Pollution Control (516) 854-2501. SECTION 4 OTHER PERMITS REQUIRED YES NO 1. Are any of the following permits required? a. Wild Scenic and Recreation Rivers Permit - NYSDEC ,~ b. Long Island Well~Vater Supply Permit- NYSDEC c. Tidal Wetlands Permit ,~ d. Fresh Water Wetlands Permit ~/ e. SPDES-D Permit, sanitary waste only - SCDHS/NYSDEC ,/ f. SPDES Permit - Industrial Waste - SCDHS/NYSDEC j g. Toxic and Hazardous Materials Storage/Handling, Article 12, SCDHS J WWM-004 (Rev. 05/06) Page 2 of 4 ENV1ROn~MENTAL QUALITY AND HEALT~REVIEXV 1. Has a determination been made by an}' other permitting agency that this project is a Type I action pursuant to SEQRA? 2. Has a determination of Environmental Significance (Negative or Positive Declaration) been issued by any other permitting agency for this project? If yes, provide copy of determination and/or details. 3. Is the property located within or substantially contiguous to a locally or county designated Critical Environmental Area (CEA) pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) and 6 NYCRR? The potential impact of any Type I or Unlisted action on the environmental characteristics of the CEA is a relevant area of environmental concern and must be evaluated in the determination of significance prepared pursuant to Section 617.7 of SEQR. 4. Is the property located within the area designated Central Pine Barrens Core Preservation Area pursuant to Article 57 of the ECL? 5. Is the project located in an area designated as "Parkland" or "Agricultural Land"? If yes, show area on plans and/or explain: 6. ls any portion of the subject property in a "Coastal Erosion Hazard Area" (pursuant to 6NYCRR Part 505) or subject to imminent erosion or flooding? Alternatively, could the project have the potential to cause erosion, drainage or flooding problems on adjacent or neighboring properties? 7. Will the completed project have an adverse effect on existing air quality, or routinely produce odors, vibrations or operating noise which exceeds the local ambient noise levels? If yes, explain: 8. Will there be an adverse effect to existing traffic patterns? If yes, explain: 9. Has the property ever been used for the disposal or burial of solid waste or hazardous waste? If yes, show area on plans and/or explain: 10. Are there any existing environmental factors which may affect the public health and safety of the completed project's occupants (for example, neighboring landfills, petroleum spills, toxic materials, noise sources, odors, etc.)? 11. Will the proposed action affect any water sources, surface or groundwater quality or quantity? Ex. Will action require: A discharge permit Water supply from wells with greater than 45 gpm capacity Water use in excess of 20,000 gpd Storage of> 1,100 gallons of petroleum or chemical products New or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities 12. Does the property contain any species of plant or animal life listed as rare threatened, or endangered by Ne~v York State, the New York State Natural Heritage Program? 13. Will the project substantially affect any non-threatened or non-endangered species? If yes, explain: 14. Is the property substantially contiguous to, or does it contain, a building, site or district listed on the National or New York State Registers of Historic Places? 15. Could the project affect the community or neighborhood character or adversely affect any aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, or other natural or cultural resources? If yes, explain: 16. Have any unique or unusual landforms been identified on site? If yes, explain: WWM-004 (Rev. 05/06) Page 3 of 4 17. If yes,D°es theexplain:property contain soic views known to be im'pdrtaht to t~ommunity?~ 18. Is the subject property within 100' of any surface water(s) or regulated wetland(s)? If yes, shoxv on plans. 19. Is the parcel subject to existing covenants or restrictions? If yes, explain: 20. Does the project require a change in zoning or a zoning variance? If yes, explain: 21. Is there a public water wellfield within 1,500 feet of property boundaries? If yes, show on plans. 22. Could the project result in any adverse effects associated with the production, storage, processing or disposal of solid wastes? If 7es, explain: 23. Will the property be mined? If yes, how much: 24. Will there be a significant adverse impact to the community's source of fuel or energy supply? If yes, explain: 25. Will there be a significant adverse impact to the quality or quantity of existing or future open space? If yes, explain: If the answer to any of the questions in Section 5 is "YES" please explain below: APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE FOR A PERMIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS APPLICATION, SURVEY(S) AND PLAN(S) SUBMITTED. I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION ON ALL THE PAGES OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL THE ATTACHMENTS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY ME AND THAT, BASED ON MY INQUIRIES, SITE INVESTIGATION(S) AND/OR OTHER STUDY(lES), I BELIEVE THAT THE INFORMATION IS TRUE, ACCURATE AND COMPLETE. I LrNDERSTAND THAT FALSE STATEMENTS MADE HEREIN ARE PUNISHABLE AS A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO SECTION 210.45 OF THE PENAL LAW. Property Owner's Signature Print Name ,/ Applicant's Signature Print Name Date Design Professional's Signature ('~-, ~ -,, Pnnt Name \( ' ":~'.~'.'w ~ ~:., ~_t', /"" ~'': E~cense # WWM-004 (Rev. 05/06) Page 4 of 4 WWM - 006 (Rev. 5/02) SUFF(~COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH S~t~CES "~cFICE OF WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT 360 YAPHANK AVENUE, SUITE 2C YAPHANK, NEW YORK 11980 NOTICE (631) 852-5700 GMZ NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION- COMMERCIAL ITO: Jeffrey T. Butler PE PC [ PROJECT NAME: New Suffolk Harbor Inn Post Office Box 634 ti REFERENCE NO.: C10-06-0002 Shoreham, New York 11786 SCTM NO.: 1000-117-8-18 Your submission for the referenced project has been reviewed. This office will require the following for further review and/or approval: [] Completed Application WWM-004 [] Processing Fee $*50.00 due [] SEQRA Determination - Town & County [] Wetlands Permit or Waiver - N-YSDEC [] Town / Village Zoning Letter [] Restrictive Covenants for: [] SPDES Application form D [] Well Water Analysis [] Public Water Availability Letter [] Engineering Report, Pump Station [] Article 6 (Subdivision) Approval [] Water Quality Approval [] Pollution Control Approval [] SCDPW Approval [] Review Board Determination [] P.E. /R.A. Ce~tificatioo of Existing Sanitary System [] Certificate of Authorization or Disclaimer INFORMATION MISSING AND/OR [] Gross Floor Area of Building(s) [] All Surface Waters Within 300 fl. [] Topographical Contours (5 ft. interval) [] Neighboring Wells within 150' of specify that there are none) [] Signature & Seal of Design Professional [] 5" x 7" Clear Area for Department Approval [] Suffolk County Tax Map Number [] Metes and Bounds Description [] Lot Size [] Key Map [] Distance to Cross Street [] [] Location/Date/Results of Soil Borings / Test Holes [] [] Floor Plans [] Property (or CORRECTIONS REQUIRED ON PLANS[] Stom~ Drainage Structure Locations [] Gallons/Day/Acre Sewage Discharge [] Sewage Disposal Design Calculations Location / Layout of Sewage System Profile / Details of Sewage System Sewage System Invert Elevations 50% Expansion Area for Leaching Pools [] Water Service Line Location(s) [] Private Well Details and Location [] Profile / Details/Location of Water Supply System [] Existing Building, Sewage/Water System Location(s) [] Other: Project does not conform to Department Standards. See enclosed Notice of Non-Conformance. [] Comments: You must include the amount of kitchen waste when computing the capacity of the septic system. You must have a 0.5 foot drop across the septic tank. All septic system components must have a cast iron cover at Fade. There must be a minimum 8 foot horizontal edge-to-edae separation between leaching pools. The processing fee for this project is $1500.00. You paid $650.00 leaving a balance due of $850.00. Are both Building B and C Occupiable Space as defined in the New York State Building code? Storage Space is computed as General Industrial Space with a flow factor of 0.04 gpd/sq foot. Please review Chapter 40 of the Recommended Standards for Wastewater Facilities, commonly refen-ed to as tim 10 State Standards and provide an Engineering Report detailing what the specifications for the pump station are. CC: Michael Raynor R ,E V IL,WE D IKY :~OlSn/E- -Fi~ ~e~'~'P '~'/ Mattituck, New York 11952 ~ ,~/A~E: April 10, 09,.Qj PLEASE RETURN A COPY OF TillS FORM WITIt ANY RESUBSIISSION(S) WWM - 006 (Rev. 5/02) SUFFOtOUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SEI~SES ~FICE OF WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT'~ 360 YAPHANK AVENUE, SUITE 2C YAPHANK, NEW YORK 11980 NOTICE 2 (631) 852-5700 GMZ 4 NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION - COMMERCIAL Post Office Box 634 REFERENCE NO.: C 10-06-0002 Shoreham, New York 11786 SCTM NO.: 1000-117-8-18 Your submission for the referenced project has been reviewed. This office will require the following for further review and/ur approval: [] Completed Application WWM-004 [] Engineering Report, Pump Station [] Processing Fee $*50.00 due [] Article 6 (Subdivision) Approval [] SEQRA Determination - County [] Water Quality Approval [] Wetlands Permit or Waiver - NYSDEC [] Pollution Control Approval [] Town / Village Zoning Letter [] SCDPW Approval [] Restrictive Covenants for: [] Review Board Determination [] SPDES Application form D [] P.E. / R.A. Certification of Existing Sanitary System [] Well Water Analysis [] Certificate of Authorization or Disclaimer [] Public Water Availability Letter [] INFORMATION MISSING AND/OR CORRECTIONS REQUIRED ON PLANS [] Suffolk County Tax Map Number [] Storm Drainage Structure Locations [] Metes and Bounds Description [] Lot Sizc [] Kcy Map [] Distance to Cross Street [] Location/Date/Results of Soil Borings / Test Holes [] Floor Plans [] Gross Floor Area of Building(s) [] All Surface Waters Within 300 ft. [] Topographical Contours (5 ft. interval) [] Neighboring Wells within 150' of Property (or specify that there are none) [] Signature & Seal of Design Professional [] 5" x 7" Clear Area for Department Approval [] Gallons/Day/Acre Sewage Discharge [] Sewage Disposal Design Calculations [] Location / Layout of Sewage System [] Profile / Details of Sewage System [] Sewage System Invert Elevations [] 50% Expansion Area for Leaching Pools [] Water Service Line Location(s) [] Private Well Details and Location [] Profile / Details/Location of Water Supply System [] Existing Building, Sewage/Water System Location(s) [] Other: Project does not conform to Department Standards. See enclosed Notice of Non-Conformance. PLEASE RETURN A COPY OF THIS FORM WITH ANY RESUBMISSION(S) [] Comments: You must include the amount of kitchen waste when computing the capacity of the septic system. You must have a 0.5 foot drop across the septic tank. All septic system components must have a cast iron cover at grade. There must be a minimum 8 foot horizontal edge-to-edge separation between leaching pools. The processinl,. fee for this project is $1500.00. You paid $650.00 leaving a balance due of $850.00. Are both Building B and C Occupiable Space as defined in the New York State Building code? Storage Space is computed as General Industrial Space with a flow factor of 0.04 gpd/sq foot. Please review Chapter 40 of the Recommended Standards fo~ Wastewater Facilities, commonly referred to as the 10 State Standards and provide an Engineering Report detailing what the specifications for the pump station are. I will take care of getting the countVs SEQRA Determination. 1 will need the attached New Application Form and page 1 of the short environmental assessment form completed and returned in order for me to do that The Town's SEQRA Determination is a positive declaration and refers to 17 Boat Racks totaling 7,572 square feet. Will these boat racks be stored within some sort of enclosure or just be outside storage? Please clarify the differences between the project description provided this department and that detailed in the Town's SEQRA Determination. CC: Michael Raynor '-~i~-~-~a~ ......... 160Inlet ViewEast ffff' ---------I ~kTE:Aug. u2_t4~,f~__..~_~ ................. nattituck, New York 11952 Ifl~'ATE:_Au PLEASE RETURN A COPY OF THIS FOR/~I WITH ANY RESUBMISSION(S) WWM - 006 (Rev. 5/02) SUFFO~iZOUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SE ~FICE OF WASTEWATER MANAGEM 360 YAPHANK AVENUE, SUITE 2C YAPHANK, NEW YORK 11980 NOTICE (631) 852-5700 GMZ NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION - COMMERCIAL ITO: Jeffrey T. Butler PE PC Post Office Box 634 Shoreham, New York 11786 IPROJECT NAME: New Suffolk Harbor Inn REFERENCE NO.: C10-06-0002 SCTM NO.: 1000-117-8-18 3 4 Your submission for the referenced project has been reviewed. This office will require the following for [] Engineering Report, Pump Station [] Article 6 (Subdivision) Approval [] Water Quality Approval [] Pollution Control Approval [] SCDPW Approval [] Review Board Determination [] P.E. / R.A. Certification of Existing Sanitary System [] Certificate of Authorization or Disclaimer further review and/or approval: [] Completed Application WWM-004 [] Processing Fee $850.00 due [] SEQRA Determination - County [] Wetlands Permit or Waiver - NYSDEC [] Town / Village Zoning Letter [] Restrictive Covenants for: [] SPDES Application form Dand associated special plan [] Well Water Analysis [] Public Water Availability Letter INFORMATION MISSING AND/OR CORRECTIONS REQUIRED ON PLANS [] Suffolk County Tax Map Number [] Metes and Bounds Description [] Lot Size [] Key Map [~] Distance to Cross Street [] Locatiorff Date/Results of Soil Borings / Test Holes [] Floor Plans [] Gross Floor Area of Building(s) [] All Surface Waters Within 300 ft. [] Topographical Contours (5 ft. interval) [] Neighboring Wells within 150' of Property (or specify that there are none) [] Signature & Seal of Design Professional i [] 5" x 7" Clear Area for Department Approval [] Storm Drainage Structure Locations [] Gallons/Day/Acre Sewage Discharge [] Sewage Disposal Design Calculations [] Location / Layout of Sewage System [] Profile / Details of Sewage System [] Sewage System Invert Elevations 50% Expansion Area for Leaching Pools Water Service Line Location(s) Private Well Details and Location Profile / Details/Location of Water Supply System Existing Building, Sewage/Water System Location(s) [] Other: Project does not conform to Department Standards. See enclosed Notice of Non-Conformance. PLEASE RETURN A COPY OF THIS FORM WITH ANY RESUBMISSION(S) [] Comments: All septic system components must have a cast iron cover at grade. The piping from a distribution leaching pool to a final pool cannot be from the midpoint on the liquid depth from one pool to another, desi~ the system in accordance with the design construction standards of the code. The processing fee for this proiect is $1500.00. You paid $650.00 leaving a balance due of $850.00. Please review Chapter 40 of the Recommended Standards for Wastewater Facilities, commonly referred to as the 10 State Standards and provide an EngineerinE Report detailing what the specifications for the pump station are. You have quoted sections of chapter 40. These quotes do not constitute an engineerinq specification for this specific pump station. This office requires a complete detailed engineering specification for this particular station coveting all the aspects of Chapter 40 of the 10 State Standards. I will take care of getting the county's SEQRA Determination. I will need the attached New Application Form and page I of the short environmental assessment form completed and returned in order forme to do that. You provided the short environmental assessment form but did not return the revised application for. I need both in order to be able to make an environmental determination. How will you achieve a liquid depth of 6.4 feet per sanitary leaching pool, especially when the profile specify's a 3.3 liquid depth? Reiterating my last notice, The Town's SEQRA Determination is a positive declaration and refers to 17 Boat Rack~ totaling 7,572 square feet. Will these boat racks be stored within some sort of enclosure or just be outside storage? Please clarify the differences between the project description provided this department and that detailed in the Town'>; SEQRA Determination. CC: Michaell60inlet ViewEastRayn°r ~1~~~--~ ..... ] ATE: De~7~b-~ !: - .-~- i}'"~J PLEASE RETURN A COPY OF THIS FORM WITH ANY RESUBMISSION(S) WWM - 006 (Rev. 5/02) SUFFOOOUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SE[~ES OFFICE OF WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT 360 YAPHANK AVENUE, SUITE 2C YAPHANK, NEW YORK 11980 NOTICE 4 (631) 852-5700 GMZ 4 NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION - COMMERCIAL ITO: Jeffrey T. Butler PE PC I PROJECT NAME: New Suffolk Harbor Inn Post Office Box 634 '1 REFERENCE NO.: C 10-06-0002 Shoreham, New York 11786 ~ I SCTM NO.: 1000-117-8-18 Your submission for the referenced project has been reviesved. This office will require the following for further review and/or approval: [] Completed Application WWM-004 [] Processing Fee $ due [] SEQRA Determination - County [] Wetlands Permit or Waiver - NYSDEC [] Toxvn / Village Zoning Letter ]Restrictive Covenants for: [] SPDES Application form Dand associated special plan [] Well Water Analysis [] Public Water Availability Letter [] Engineering Report, Pump Station [] Article 6 (Subdivision) Approval [] Water Quality Approval [] Pollution Control Approval [] SCDPW Approval [] Review Board Determination [] P.E. / R.A. Certification of Existing Sanitary System [] Certificate of Authorizatiou or Disclaimer INFORMATION MISSING AND/OR [] Suffolk County Tax Map Number [] Metes and Bounds Description [] Lot Size [] Key Map ]Distance to Cross Street [] Location/Date/Results of Soil Borings / Test Holes [] Floor Plans CORRECTIONS REQUI RED ON PLANS []Storm Drainage Structure Locations [] Gallons/Day/Acre Sewage Discharge [] Sewage Disposal Design Calculations [] Location / Layout of Sewage System [] Profile / Details of Sewage System ]Sewage System Invert Elevations [] Gross Floor Area of Building(s) [] All Surface Waters Within 300 fi. [] Topographical Coutours (5 ft. interval) [] Neighboring Wells within 150' of specify that there are none) [] Signature & Seal of Design Professional [] 5" x 7" Clear Area for Department Approval Property (or [] 50% Expausion Area for Leaching Pools [] Water Service Line Location(s) [] Private Well Details and Location [] Profile / Details/Location of Water Supply System [] Existing Building, Sewage~Vater System Location(s) [] Other: Project does not conform to Department Standards. See enclosed Notice of Non-Conformance. PLEASE RETURN A COPY OF THIS FORM WITH ANY RESUBMISS1ON(S) L~ Comments: Reiterating nay last notice, The Town's SEQRA Determination is a positive declaration and refers to 17 Boat Racks totalin~ 7,572 square feet. Will these boat racks be stored within some sort of enclosure or iust bc outside storage? The latest submission does not discuss emergency power for the alarm system and pump station. Please review chapter 40 of the 10 States Standards paragraph 47 for guidence. I presume these are grinder pumps. You may also, want to investigate the E-I Pump Station which is a packa~oe unit from the E-1 Corporation for this use. Since the proposed pump station will be in ~oround water you will need to provide information concerning bouyancy requirements. I am missing pao~e 4 of the Town's SEQRA Determination. You provided a copy of part of NYSDEC Permit but did not include a copy of the site plan with the DEC Approval Stamp on it. The revised application form left section 2 blank vet. the design calculations indicate you are designing for a restaurant with 13 Bar Seats. 45 Year-Around Restaurant Seats, and 40 Seasonal Restaurant Seats, please clarify. I note the previously maximum permited seating for this restaurant is 55 seats. Pa~e I of the Environmental Assessment form Submitted has a negative answer for questions 10 and 12 where an affirmative answer would be appropriate since permits from the NYSDEC and the SCDHS are required. CC: Michael Raynor 160 Inlet View East Mattituck, New York 11952 PLEASE RETURN At~py OF THIS FORM ~V1TH ANY R~SUBMISSION(S) PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 October 17, 2006 Mrs. Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Proposed Amended Site Plan of Mattoa Mar by the Bay Located at e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street known as 650 First Street in New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Zone M-II Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, October 16, 2006: WHEREAS, This application for site plan approval proposes 17 boat racks storing 9 boats per rack for a total of 153 boat capacity, 10 wet boat slips, use of an existing restaurant and storage building on a 3.25 acre parcel in the Mil Zone located at e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street also known as 650 First Street located in New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18; and WHEREAS, pursuant to NYSCRR Regulations Part 617 (SEQR), on May 11, 2005, the Town of Southold Planning Board informed the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation that the Town of Southold Planning Board established itself as Lead Agency for the proposed action; and WHEREAS, the Town of Southold Planning Board agreed to hold the determination of significance open to April 24th, 2006 and the date has passed with no new supplemental information submitted by the applicant agent; and WHEREAS, on May 9, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, established itself as lead agency; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has reviewed the report titled Environmental Assessment Review Environmental and Planning Considerations Matt-A -Mar BV the Bay, LLC ~ New Suffolk prepared by Nelson, Pope and Voorhis, LLC; and Matt-a Mar by the Bay Paqe Two October 171 2006 WHEREAS, on May 9, 2006, the Town of Southold Planning Board hereby adopts a Positive Declaration for the proposed action; and WHEREAS, on May 9, 2006, the Town of Southold Planning Board pursuant to Article 617.8, will be required scoping for the action; and WHEREAS, on May 9, 2006, pursuant to Article 617.13 of the 6NYCC, Part 617 State Environmental Quality Review Act the agents applicant was notified that they be financially responsible for costs incurred for the review and website posting of the draft and final Environmental Impact Statements by the Town of Southold; therefore be it RESOLVED, on October 16, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board has not received any additional information on this project and the project Positive Declaration will remain in effect until the agent submits the required draft scope. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, house Chairperson enc. cc: Scott A. Russell, Supervisor Southold Town Board Patdcia Finnegan, Town Attorney Kieran Corcoran, Assistant Town Attorney Melissa Spire, Southold Town Land Preservation Coordinator Steve Resler, New York Department of State Southotd Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Conservation Advisory Committee Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning Suffolk County Water Authority, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany Environmental Notice Bulletin Charles Voorhis, Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Office of Ecology, Kimberly Shaw New York State Departm~ilt of Environmental Conservi~on · -- DiCision of Environmental Pcalffiits, Region One Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Phone: (631) 444-0365 · FAX: (631) 444-0360 Website: www.dec.state.ny.us September 15, 2006 Denise M. Sheehan Commissioner Patricia Moore 51020 Main Street , Southold, NY 11952 Re: Application #1-4738-01008/00008 Matt-A Mar Marina, 650 First Street, New Suffolk · Proposed Boat Storage, Drainage & Parking Improvements Dear Ms. Moore: The Department of Environmental Conservation is in receipt of your recent correspondence dated August 11, 2006 to support your client's applications for Tidal Wetlands permits, and we have made the following determinations. Pursuant tn State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) the Town of Southold Planning Board, acting as lead agency, has chosen not to include the bulkhead replacement project and the restaurant,s septic system replacement project as part of their SEQRA review for the proposed boat storage, drainage and parking improvement project. In addition, the replacement of a bulkhead and a septic system appear to be classified as Type II actions which are exempt from SEQRA. Therefore, your client's request to replace the bulkhead will be treated as a separate individual.application for permit (# 1-4738-01008/00009) and your client's request to replace the septic system will be treated as a separate individual application for permit (# 1-4738- 01008/00010). Submissions or responses to these applications must be done separately for each application and cover letters should clearly indicate which application is being addressed. Your client's application for a Tidal Wetlands permit to construct new boat storage structures, and to construct new drainage structures and make parking area improvements remains incomplete for the following items. 1) Your client must submit a site plan (5 copies) showing apparent high water, apparent low water, vegetated wetland areas should they exist, and all proposed upland work including the proposed boat storage structures, parking area improvements and drainage improvements. The site plan must depict any proposed filling, amounts of fill, source of fill, grading areas, excavation areas, materials to be used for parking areas and dimensions for all proposed structures. The plans should clearly show which structures are existing and what structures are proposed. 2) The site plan must provide a lot coverage calculation comparing the total upland (non- wetland) area to the area proposed to be covered by new and existing impervious structures or surfaces. If the lot coverage exceeds the 20 % maximum allowed then your client must submit a variance request addressing the items listed in section 661.11. 3) The Tidal Wetlands Land Use Regulations (6NYCRR Part 661) state that any increase in surface water runoff to tidal wetlands must be prevented. If your client is proposing any paved or impervious parking areas then your client must demonstrate that all storm water from a 2.5" rain event will be contained on site by drainage structures. The project plans must include stormwater calculations showing the collection area, amount of stormwater to be collected, and capacities of proposed drainage structures. Be advised, this department will object to any proposed increase in stormwater runoff being discharged to marine waters. 4) This project is being reviewed pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). The Town of Southold has been designated as lead agency. A determination of significance for the purposes of SEQRA are necessary before the application can he considered complete. Be further advised, all new structures are required to be more than 75 feet from the tidal wetland boundary. If any structures are proposed less than 75 feet from the wetland boundary your client must submit a variance request addressing all the items listed in section 661.11. This application will remain incomplete until all the above items are adequately addressed. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (631) 444-0374 if you have any questions or you wish to discuss this matter further. Sincerely, Mark Can:ara Deputy Permit Administrator CC: Matt-A-Mar Marina LLC Town of Southold Planning Board New Suffolk Waterfront Committee file New York State Departn~at of Environmental Conser~iion Division of Environmental Pc~lllrfita, Region One Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Phone: (631) 444-0365 · FAX: (631) 444-0360 Website: www. dec.state ny. us September 15, 2006 Denise M. Sheehan Commissioner Patricia Moore 51020 Main Street Southold, NY 11952 Re: Application #1-4738-01008/00010 Matt-A Mar Marina, 650 First Street, New Suffolk Proposed Septic System Replacement Dear Ms. Moore: The Department of Environmental Conservation is in receipt of yo~ r'~ent correspondence dated August 11, 2006 regarding several of your client's applications for Tidal Wetlands permits, and we have made the following determinations. Pursuant to State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) the Town of Southold Planning Board, acting as lead agency, has chosen not to include the restaurant's septic system replacement project as part of their SEQRA review for the proposed boat storage, drainage and parking improvement project. In addition, the replacement ora septic system appears to be classified as a Type II action which is exempt from SEQRA. Therefore, your client's request to replace the septic system is being treated as a separate individual application for a Tidal Wetlands permit (#1-4738-01008/00010). Submissions or responses to these applications must be done separately for each application and cover letters should clearly indicate which application is being addressed. Currently the department is evaluating the project plans for the septic system replacement project. Your client will be notified subsequent to our technical review of this application. Additional ite~ns may be requested subsequent to our inspection and technical review. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (631) 444-0374 if you have any questions or you wish to discuss this matter further. Sincerely, Deputy Permit Administrator CC~ Matt-A-Mar Marina LLC Town of Southold Planning Board New Suffolk Waterfront Committee file ~ York State Departm~itt of Environmental Conser~etJion Division of Environmental P~l~its, Region One Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Phone: (631) 444-0365 · FAX: (631) 444-0360 Website: www.dec.state.ny, us September 15, 2006 Denise M. Sheehan Commissioner Patricia Moore 51020 Main Street Southold, NY 11952 ae~ Application #1-4738-01008/00009 Matt-A Mar Marina, 650 First Street, New Suffolk Proposed Bulkhead Replacement Dear Ms. Moore: The Department of Environmental Conservation is in receipt of your r~gent~ff[§~b~tence dated August 11,2006 regarding several of your client's applications for)'idal Wetlands permits, and we have made the following determinations. Pursuant to State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) the Town of Southold .Planning Board, acting as lead agency, has chosen not to include the bulkhead replacement project as part of their SEQRA review for the proposed boat storage, drainage and parking improvement project. In addition, the replacement of a bulkhead appears to be classified as a Type II action which is exempt from SEQRA. Therefore, your client's request to replace the bulkhead will be treated separately as an individual application for permit (#1-4738-01008/00009). Submissions or responses to these applications must be done separately for each application and cover letters should clearly indicate which application is being addressed. Your client's application for a Tidal Wetlands permit to replace the bulkheading at the site remains incomplete for the following items 1) Your client must submit a site plan (5 copies) that depicts the dimensions of all proposed bulkhead work (lengths, distances, widths), backfill areas, fill storage areas, the apparent high water line, apparent low water line and any vegetated wetland areas should they exist. The site plans must clearly show which structures shall remain unchanged and which existing structures are proposed to be replaced. The site plans must also show relevant distances from fixed structures to the proposed new bulkheads and the plans must clearly state whether the bulkheads will be replaced in-place or seaward of the existing structures. 2) Your client must submit a cross section (5 copies) for each section of bulkhead work that is different. The cross sections must show apparent high water, apparent low water, backfill areas and walkways. The cross section must clearly indicate whether the bulkheads will be replaced in-place or seaward of the existing structures, and the distance between new and existing bulkheads must be clearly shown. This application will remain incomplete until all the above items are adequately addressed. Additional items may be requested subsequent to our inspection and technical review. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (631) 444-0374 if you have any questions or you wish to discuss this matter further. Sincerely, Mark Carrara Deputy Permit Administrator CCl Matt-A-Mar Marina LLC Town of Southold Planning Board New Suffolk Waterfront Committee file ERIC J. BRESSLER ABIGAIL A. WICKHAM LYNNE M. GORDON JANET GEASA LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, BRESSLER, GORDON & GEASA, P.C. 13015 MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 1424 MATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND NEW YORK 11952 631-298-8353 TELEFAX NO. 631-298-8565 wwblaw~aol.com WILLIAM WICKHAM (06-02) 275 BROAD HOLLOW ROAD SUITE 111 MELVILLE, NEW YORK 11747 631-249-9480 TELEFAX NO. 631-249-9484 September 12, 2006 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Matt-A-Mar By the Bay 650 First Street, New Suffolk SCTM ti: 1000-117-08-18 Dear Pat: I enclose a copy of the application to the Health Department made by Michael Raynor dated Feb. 28, 2006 for Change of Use of an Existing Building, increasing seating capacity from 55 seats to 98 seats (13 bar, 45 rest, 40 outside). This is clearly an expansion of the existing restaurant capacity of 55 seats. I further note on the map submitted to the Health Department that the sanitary system is not only being completely replaced, its capacity is being greatly expanded. This includes not only replacement of the existing pools, but the construction of a large, above-ground concrete container structure, 35 feet wide by 125 feet long and 7 feet high over existing grade, to contain multiple leaching pools. Contrary to your assertion, the New Suffolk Waterfront Committee does not object to the reopening of the existing restaurant in accordance with legal requirements. However, the application submitted by your client to the Health Department contains aspects which are clearly a significant expansion. Cc: Michael Verity Planning Board AA W/j t Encl. Ve~/~/uly, vours. Abigail SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMEN HEALTH SERVICES OFFICE OF WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT SUFFOLK CO~TY CENTER - ~VE~EAD, NY 11901 APPLICATION FOR SEWAGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES AND WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS FOR OTHER T~N SINGLE FAMILY ~SIDENCES This application is for (check all that apply): I [ ] New Construction [ ] Addition to Building [ ] Ej~tension of Existing Permit [ ] Food Establishment [ I Change in Use [ ] Revision of Approved Plan Iv] Renewal of Expired Permit I ] Other BrieflyDescdbetheProposalAndUse(s)ofBuilding: ~4~4;Uc~-'L ~-~' ~- '~r-':.,~lLx_~t-,%.~._[Jb-- <~q: -~a~-~},,._2 Business or Facility Name and Address Property Location: N/S/E/W side of OR Comer of SECTION 1 Town: ~ ~ . Feet N/S/E/W of and ~t~ Tax Map No.: District(s) Section(s) Block(s) Lot(s) Name of Design Prof~.~ional (If Not Am>licant) ~ Name of Agent (If Not Applicant) Telephone No. ( ) Address: Name of Industrial Park, Subdivision and/or shopping center (if applicable) Previqus Hea.l.th~DeparLment Reference No(s). Gallons Per Day~..ofbSewaget~., · Dischargel TOWnparceiZoning of per Building CodeOCCupancy Rating as (Acres)T°tal Area of Parcel Total Gross Floor Area of Building(s) Existing t~b] [Z...J~ . ~ ~" ~ Existing Proposed / e4~.- ~%~.4 ~- ¢ A 9 t'4'~'~' Proposed ~/~ cify Me'thod of Water Supply. Distance To Water Main & Name of'Nearest Public Water District' Specify Method of Sewage Disposal. ['~ffSubsufface Disposal (conventional) [ ] Public Sewers [ ] Other (explain) Distance To & Name of Nearest Public Sewer District or Treatment Plant: WWM-004(Rev. 12/00) ' - - Page 1 of 4 SECTION 2 FOR CHANGE IN USE OF AN EXISTING BUILDING ONLY. Site & floor plans will be required for review. Previous Name(s) Type afB s ness and date last open. I Floor Area of Proposed Business Da e Building Cons ructed ::Restaurant :~ ;~. ::Catering ~ :}~ SECTION 3 FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIAL STORAGE OR DISCHARGE YES NO 1. Is or will wastewater, other than sewage, be discharged into the ground9 If yes explain ' ~ 2. Is or will oil be stored for heating purposes? If yes, indicate the number, size ofoil tank(s) in gallons & year installed ~/ 3. Does the business(es) require process tanks or petroleum storage tanks such as gasoline, kerosene, diesel, gasohol, motor oil, antifreeze, or waste oil? ~ If yes, indicate number aboveground & number underground Indicate materials that are being stored 4. Does or will the business(es) have more than 250 gallons of drum storage? If yes, indicate number of drams and amount of gallons V/ 5. Does or.will, the business(es) have collection sumps, troughs, floor drains, boiler drains, etc.? d If yes explain 6. Does or will the business(es) involve any manufacturing processes or use of any / chemicals? i If yes explain If the answer to any of the above questions in section 3 are yes, then permit(s) for hazardous material storage or discharge may be necessary in accordance with Article 7 and 12 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code and a separate report may be required. Contact the Office of Pollution Control (631) 854-2501. SECTION 4 OTHER PERMITS REQUIRED YES N(~ 1. Are any of the following permits required? a. Wild Scenic and Recreation Rivers Permit - NYsDEc b. Long Island Well/Water Supply Permit- NYSDEC c. Tidal Wetlands Permit v~ d. Fresh Water Wetlands Permit e. SPDES-D Permit, sanitary waste only - SCDHS/NYSDEC f. SPDES Permit - Industrial Waste - SCDHS/NYSDEC g. Toxic and Hazardous Materials Storage/Handling, Article 12, SCDHS .~/ WWM-004 (Rev. 12/00) Page 2 of 4 SECTION 5 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND HEALTH REVIEW 1. Is the property located within or substantially contiguous to a locally or county designated Critical Environmental Area (CEA) pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) and 6NYCRR 617 (SEQRA)? 2. Is any portion of the subject property in a "Coastal Erosion Hazard Area" (pursuant to 6NYCRR Part 505) or subject to imminent erosion or flooding? If yes, show area on plans and/or explain 3. Is the property located within the area designated Central Pine Barrens Core Preservation Area pursuant to Article 57 of the ECL? 4. Has a determination of Environmental Significance (Negative or Positive Declaration) been issued by any other permitting agency for this project? If yes, provide copy of determination and/or details. 5. Has a determination been made by any other permitting agency that this project is a Type I action pursuant to SEQRA? If yes, explain 6. Will the completed project routinely produce odors, or operating noise which exceeds the local ambient noise levels? If yes, explain 7. Has the property ever been used for the disposal of solid waste or hazardous waste? If yes, show area on plans and/or explain 8. Are there any existing environmental factors which may affect the public health and safety of the completed project's occupants (for example, neighboring landfills, petroleum spills, toxic materials, noise s~urces, odors, etc.)? If yes, explain 9. Is the subject property within 100' of any surface water(s) or wetland(s)? If yes, show on plans. i0. Is the parcel subject to existing covenants or restrictions? If yes, explain 11. Does the project require a change in zoning or a zoning variance? If yes, explain 12. Is'there a public water wellfield within 1,500 feet of property boundaries? If yes, show on plans. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE FOR A PERMIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS APPLICATION, SURVEY(S) AND PLAN(S) SUBMITTED. I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION ON ALL THE PAGES OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL THE ATTACHMENTS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY ME AND THAT, BASED ON MY INQUIRIES, SITE INVESTIGATION(S) AND/OR OTHER STUDY(IES), I BELIEVE THAT THE INFORMATION IS TRUE, ACCURATE AND COMPLETE. I UNDERSTAND THAT FALSE STATEMENTS MADE HEREIN ARE PUNISHABLE AS A CLASS A MISDEMEAN,OR PU~~ 10.45 OF THE PENAL LAW. Property Owners Sign~m~?-,~5~ _ Print Name Applicant's Si Print Name Design Professional's Print Name WWM-004 (Rev. 12/00) Date 5~ ~-~¢. c.& Date License # ~5)-T~.~r~l :z~ Date Page 3 of 4 Patricia C. Moore Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 (631)765-4330 Augustll, 2006 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairwoman Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Michael. . Verity, Chief Building Inspector Bmld~ng Department P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Man-A-Mar By the Bay, 650 First Street, New Suffolk Dear Ms. Woodhouse and Mr. VeriW: ~~:_z_~ As we have stated repeatedly, the application to the Healt~Q~paffment4s~o-replge~ the existing sanitaw system for the existing restaurant. The regtaurant has not changed expanded. The restaurant merely wishes to reopen in compliance with the Health Department regulations. The letter dated August 9, 2006 by the New Suffolk Waterfront Committee is another attempt to interfere with and hinder the legal use of the property. yours, ~~"~oore CC~ Kieran Corcoran, Assistant Town Attorney Douglas Feldman, SCDHS Ref#C10-06-0002 Mark Carrera, NYSDEC Steven Resler, Chef, Regulatory Bureau, NYS Dept. Of State Abigail Wickham, Esq. Love Lane Acquisition Corp. AUG-09-~006 15:~6 FRUH: 631 ~98 LYN'N 1~ M. I.A'~ O~FIC~S WICKHAM, ~3RESSLER. GORDON & GEASA. P,C. 130ISMAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 1424 MATTI'ruc]~ LONG ISLAND NEW YORK 11952 Jc ~lvn B. Woodhouse chmrwoman Sot~thold Town Piarmiuo, Boa.rd Main Road $,outl~o!d, NY' 1 ] 935 Michael Verity, Chie£Building his?corer BuJld!~g Department P.O. Box ] 179 August 9, 2006 WILLTAM W'CKI-IAM (064)2) 275 BROAD ItOLI,OW ROAD SUITE I l 1 ME VTLLE, NEW YO~K 1174~ 63 ~-249.9480 TE]_EFAX NO~ 63 SoulhoD, \'y 11971 Re: Love Lane Acquisition Corporation D~/A Matt-A-Mar By The Bay Shipyard, New Suffolk, NY I 19~6 ' · $CTM # 10004 Dom'M~, W ' ,' teahouse atqd Mr I m~ v~Titing to y u on beha,! of:he New Su.ffolk Waterfront Commit:ce, It is our undcrslancJ~ng that the Haun.ing Board :as been advised by the Building Dot)artroom that thc Planning Board does not have jurisd c ion over the replacement of, sanitary system in kind the existing resla[imnt. We further ~nderstand :hat thc Plenn/rg Board has decided not ~o review this cxis~ting system under SEQRA Yesterday, we found th~t an application had been submitte:~ to thc Health Department on March 3, 2006 to expand the ex~sting re,tauter fi'om 55 scats to 98 scats (13 bar scats, 45 indoor reslaurant scar, and 40 outdoor *eats), and to cxpaud the existing sewuge disposal system. The vJa,~s al~ show 20 existing boat slips aad aboul 2,084 sq, fi. o'Fd~ Storage area. In ight o£1his infommt;on we rt~quest that you reconsider this matter, as the propo,al Js clearl)- to expand t]~e resmuram and lhe septic system to ~lmosl: double the existing s!ze. We do not believe this was revealed It the Town told is information it c[ca.tly should have before m.&mg e.~,y decision, tt c~ antes h.e enL~Te nature o£the appncanom We ~so r~uesL as ~e have ~revlously. that thc exact scope and nature of lbo existing and pro.sect el~enl$ of~¢ prqiect be ~ully disclosed in o~et to enable the Town lo not only determine ~'h~ it is behig ~$ked now, biff: Io have be~ehmerJis ~br ~t~ture ~'Jew mad entSrce~nent, Thank .',ou fc)r yo~r eonsideration, Sinceze[y. Abi~il Wickham Kiei~, n Corooran, Ass1. '[ow-~ Attome~ Dougias [-'¢!dn:~n, SCDI~S Ref. ~ C: ~-06-0002 Mm'k Ca,wcl'a, Ne~ York S~te Dept of Enviromnen~l Consematjen S/evcl~ R.eslct, Cl~Jef, RegulatoLv Bureau. New York State Dept of Boa~ of Trustees Palrici~ C. Moo~, Esq. New Suffolk Walcrfi-ont C~)mmittee 8565 T0:631 765 3136 P.001~803 Law Offices WICKHAM, BRESSLER, GORDON & GI~ASA, P'C' 1~015 Ma.inRoad, P.O. Box 14.24 MaPd¢uck, Nm' York 11952 631-298-835~ Telefax no. 631-298-8565 This is page one of ~- 3136 001 L~w Offices WICKHAM, BRE$$LER, GORDON & GEASA, P.C. ~3013 Main Road, P.O. Box Mattituck, New York 11952 631-291M1353 Te]efax no. 631-298-856,5 I'hls is page one of ,, ,3 PlJG-09~8[~6 10:5? F'ROi'i~ -'~ ~98 8.~5 TO: 651 T65 3156 P. r~,RIC J, A~T~'AII. A. %'ICK}4AM L"CNNE M, OORI..,',ON ] ANI?~ OF~ASA LA~ OFF1Cl-~ WICKHAM. BRESSLER, GORDON & OEASA, P.C. 1301~ MAI'N ROAD, P,O. BOX 142¢ M~\TT'ITUCIC,, LONG ISLAND NY£W yOP. K 119fi2 'I'ELEFAX NO. 631-298-8565 wwbla.w~aol.com Aagttst 9 2006 WILLIAM W1CKIqAM 275 BROAD HOLLOW ROAD SUITE 1 ~ I MEI.VILLE, NEW ¥OP.Y-. 117~7 631.2ag~gago TI-'LEFAX NO. 631-249-9484 Jedlyn B. Wooc'ihouse, Chmrwor an Southold Tow~ Planning Board Main Ro~d Sa~tl:hold, NY' 1035 Mi¢l',a,i Verity', Chief Building Insl.'ector Building Depam~em ?.O. Box 1.179 Southold, NY l ! 971 Re: Love Lane Acquisition Corporation D/BtA Matt-A-Mar By The BaF Shipyard, Now Suffolk, NY 119~6 $CTM # 1000-11%08-18 ' r Dear Ms. Woodhouse a~d M. 1 .am wrgfing to you o~ bcbalf ofth.c New Suffolk Waterr~ont Committee. It is o~ updcrstanding that 1lac Plam~ine Bored h~ Seen advised by the B~ding D~pa~m~t ~at the Platm]ng Board doe~ not l:a.ve iurisdicfion over the r~la~ment of a. s~ system m kind fo thc cx~sEng ~.es~.aurm~t' We {u~her und.~tand that the ~anning ~d h~s deeidod not t° review this existl ag sTstem andc~ SEQRA. yesterd*y, we fom~d that a.~ applica~o~ bad ~en submi~d to ~e He,ih Dep~ment on M~cb 5.2006 to exp~d t~ ex~st~ restaur~t ~om S~ scats ~ 98 s~m (13 b~ se~, 45 indoor reStaurmai ~a~s, aud 40 outdoor seats)~ md to exp~d the plans al~ sho~ 20 existing ~nt slips ~d a~ut 2,084 ~. In 1 ~t of th s info~mafion ~%'e request that you r*mn8~¢~r;~L~ clearly to expaeo m; resumr~ anu m; ~*e~,~. so- ra~king ~my decisio~. It cha~ge.~ the entire nature o~:the aoplication. We also rcq.ae,st, as we have prey cmsly~ that the exact ~ope ~md n~mre of the ¢~i,~ting a~d proposed demenX5 oft,he ]?roject be ~!lly c!i~closecl in order to enable lhe Town to not op,[y determine wheat it is being asked aow, bvt lo have be chmarks for i'u~re review and enforcement, you ~or } our c .ms~d~ra~om Abigail Wickham Douglas Feldman. SCD[ lS Rcf, ¢ Ci0-06-0002 Mark Carrern, Ney, York Sta:e Dcpt of Euvim~m~enmt Cvnsc~ation S~.even Rosier. Ch~el( Regula~;ory B~reau. Nzw York State Dept of State Board ~)~' Trustees Patdeia C, Moore, Esq. New Su~tb/k Wamrfi:ont Comr'~il~cg PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 July 3, 2006 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Rel Proposed Site Plan for Matt-A-Mar Marina by the Bay Located on the e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street Known as 650 First Street, New Suffolk. SCTM~ 1000-117-8-18 Zone: M-II, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: In regard to your letter dated May 30, 2006, the Planning Board held a work session and agreed to the following; The Planning Board has no issue with the NYS DEC reviewing and approving if required the replacement of a sanitary system in kind for the existing restaurant. Replacement of the existing septic system is not being reviewed under SEQRA bythe Southold Town Planning Board. Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any questions. Sincerely, Chairperson Cc: File Kc,ata & mt PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 (BY HAND) June 20, 2006 Re: Matt-A-Mar By the Bay, SCTM#1000-117--08-18 LLC Dear Chairperson and Board: On May 30, 2006 we requested the Board respond to the DEC, as lead agency. For your information, the Health Department issued their own SEQRA determination which is enclosed. We would request that the Board, as the lead agency, issue a Type II determination with regard to the replacement of an existing sanitary system. cc: Matt-A-Mar By the Bay, LLC .Ver~/ yours, SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES OFFICE OF WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT SUFFOLK COUNTY CENTER RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK 11901 State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance H.S. Reference Number ~7/O -~, --¢")¢~2.¢. Date This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pedaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law. SEQRA Status: Type 1 [ ] Type 2 [,%] Unlist? ,.~..,~..~ Description of Action: ~/.~c~,, Design Sewage Flow Method of Sewage Dis~sal Upon completion of the review of site plans and accompanying Environmental Assessment Questionnaire, it has been found that the proposed construction of the sewage and water supply facilities for the above referenced facility should not have an adverse effect on the area and that the project should not have a significant effect on the environment. By: ' ' //' ' ~ SCDHS - f:'u~lth Engineer WWM-015 (11/04) Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 (BY HAND) PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Re: Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 May 30, 2006 Existing Restaurant Near Matt-A-Mar by the Bay, LLC SCTM#1000-117-08-18 Dear Chairperson and Board: We write regarding the installation of a septic tank at the existing restaurant located at or around 650 First Street, New Suffolk, NY (the "Existing Restaurant"). The Existing Restaurant is scheduled to be reopened for the 2006 summer season. The Suffolk County Department of Health Services ("SCDHS") has notified Matt-A-Mar by the Bay, LLC that, in order to reopen the Existing Restaurant, a replacement sanitary system must be installed. This installation will require the issuance of an operational permit by SCDHS. The proposed installation is separate from a nearby boat rack project and is merely a replacement in kind of an existing septic system due to the Existing Restaurant' s permit renewal. On April 28, 2006 the Southold Town Planning Board (the "Board") issued a Determination of Significance in the matter of Matt-A-Mar by the Bay LLC @ New Suffolk, SCTM No. 1000-117-08-18, in which the Board determined that the installation of boat racks at the marina, near the Existing Restaurant, may have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Determination of Significance is enclosed for your convenience. The Board also mentioned the "maintenance of an existing restaurant and storage building" in connection with its determination, but the Board did not elaborate on any actions concerning the restaurant. Because the Existing Restaurant is located within 280 feet of a wetlands, we initially sought to obtain a permit for the installation of the upgraded septic system of the Existing Restaurant from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation ("NYS DEC"). However, the NYS DEC subsequently informed us that, because the Board is the lead agency for the review of the boat rack, the NYS DEC would not issue approval for the septic system until the SEQRA process is completed for the boat rack. As the season for opening the Existing Restaurant quickly approaches, we respectfully request clarification as to the Board' s lead agency status with regards to the upgrade of the restaurant's septic system. Should the Board determine that it is not lead agency with respect to the installation of the septic at the Existing Restaurant, we will be able to seek a determination of significance from another agency and possibly salvage what remains of the summer season. In the event the Board declares or has declared itself lead agency with respect to the installation of the septic tank, we respectfully request that the Board indicate to the NYS DEC its approval of segmentation of the review of the Existing Restaurant' s septic system from its review of the boat racks. This will allow us to move forward with the septic installation and open the Existing Restaurant in a timely manner, without any adverse impact on the environment. The septic system replacement at the Existing Restaurant is entirely separate and distinct from the boat rack application, and segmentation is warranted for the following reasons: Approval of the sanitary does not commit either the Lead Agency or the owner to any determination with respect to the boat rack application. The septic system at the Existing Restaurant will be pursued regardless of the boat rack project. No common development plan connects the Existing Restaurant with the boat rack application. The restaurant has and will continue to operate independently of the proposed boat racks. The only reason the installation of a septic is required at this time is because the Health Department requires an upgrade of the existing sanitary system in connection with the Existing Restaurant's operational permit renewal. While the septic system replacement will occur in the same general geographic area as the proposed boat racks, the installation of a new septic system at the Existing Restaurant is unrelated to the Board' s Determination of Significance. Rather, the basis of that determination was the proposed development of boat racks, which had primarily a visual impact that an underground septic system will not affect. Therefore, the fact that the Existing Restaurant is located near the proposed boat racks should not be dispositive of the Board' s Determination of Significance. The installation of a new septic system at the Existing Restaurant is a replacement in kind and merely a continuation of an existing use. The Existing Restaurant has been operated on this site for years prior to the proposed action regarding the boat racks. Ultimately, the environmental review of the boat rack application will not be affected by segmentation of the review of the septic system installation at the Existing Restaurant. The Existing Restaurant will be managed and operated by a different entity than the proposed boat racks. The Existing Restaurant is leased and separately managed and operated from the Marina. The Existing Restaurant' s proposed septic system will not have any cumulative or synergistic affect on the proposed boat racks. Indeed, the Existing Restaurant is functionally independent of the proposed boat racks. As a general matter, the boats that could use the proposed boat racks contain their own sanitary systems and the racks themselves are considered a "dry use." Consequently, a segmented review of the septic system will not minimize the potential combined environmental impact of the two projects and will not allow the projects to evade the detailed review required under SEQRA. In light of the above stated reasons, should the board determine that it is lead agency for the review of the septic installation at the Existing Restaurant, we respectfully request that the Board segment its review of the septic installation and issue a Type II determination with regard to the replacement of the existing sanitary system. cc: Matt-A-Mar By the Bay, LLC PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 May 9, 2006 Mrs. Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Proposed Amended Site Plan of Matt-a Mar by the Bay Located at e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street known as 650 First Street in New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Zone M-II Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, May 8, 2006: WHEREAS, This application for site plan approval proposes 17 boat racks storing 9 boats per rack for a total of 153 boat capacity, 10 wet boat slips, use of an existing restaurant and storage building on a 3.25 acre parcel in the Mil Zone located at e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street also known as 650 First Street located in New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18; and WHEREAS, pursuant to NYSCRR Regulations Part 617 (SEQR), on May 11, 2005, the Town of Southold Planning Board informed the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation that the Town of Southold Planning Board established itself as Lead Agency for the proposed action; and WHEREAS, on August 5, 2005 the applicant's agent submitted a request that the determination of significance remain open; and WHEREAS, the Town of Southold Planning Board agreed to hold the determination of significance open to April 24th, 2006 and the date has passed with no new supplemental information submitted by the applicant agent; therefore be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, established itself as lead agency, and be it further RESOLVED, The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has reviewed the report titled Environmental Assessment Review Environmental and Planninq Considerations Matt-A -Mar By the Bay, LLC ¢,, New Suffolk prepared by Nelson, Pope and Voorhis, LLC, and be it further Matt-a Mar by the Bay Paqe Two May 9, 2006 RESOLVED, that because the proposed action may have a significant impact on the environment the Town of Southold Planning Board hereby adopts a Positive Declaration for the proposed action, and be it further RESOLVED, that pursuant to Article 617.$, scoping will be required for the action, and be it fudher RESOLVED, pursuant to Article 617.13 of the 6NYCC, Part 617 State Environmental Quality Review Act the applicant will be financially responsible for costs incurred for the review and website posting of the draft and final Environmental Impact Statements by the Town of Southold. Enclosed is a copy of the Positive Declaration dated April 28, 2006 for your records. Additionally, as indicated above, scoping shall be required for the action. Please provide a draft scope for distribution to all involved agencies. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Chairperson el-lC, cc: Scott A. Russell, Supervisor Southold Town Board Patricia Finnegan, Town Attorney Kieran Corcoran, Assistant Town Attorney Melissa Spiro, Southold Town Land Preservation Coordinator Steve Resler, New York Department of State Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Building Department Southoid Town Conservation Advisory Committee Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning Suffolk County Water Authority New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany Environmental Notice Bulletin Charles Voorhis, Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SEQR POSITIVE DECLARATION Determination of Significance Notice of Determination of Significance Lead Agency.- Town of Southold Planning Board Contact; Address: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Date: April 28, 2006 This notice is issued pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review - SEQR) of the Environmental Conservation Law and Chapter 44 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will have a significant effect on the environment. This determination provides a description of the proposed project and outlines the considerations of the Board in making this determination: Title o fAction: SEQR Status: Mat-A-Mar by the Bay, LLC ~ New Suffolk Unlisted Action Location: The site is located on the east side of First Street, approximately 32 feet south of King Street in New Suffolk, Town of Southold, NY. The site is 3.25 acres in size (2.94 acres above mean high water) and is located within the Marine Il (M-II) zoning district. SC TM No.: 1000-117-08-18 Brief Description of the Proposed Action: The proposed action involves a site plan application for the construction of 17 boat racks with a 153 boat capacity (9 boats per rack) totaling 7,572 s.f., as well as the maintenance of an existing restaurant and storage building. As stated above, the upland portion of the site totals 2.94 acres in size and the site is located in the Town of Southold's M-II zoning district. Determination of Significance Mat-A-Mar by the Bay, LLC ~ New Suffolk Site Plan Application, Southold As depicted on the Site Plan, all of the proposed boat racks will be located in the northern portion of the site and each will contain two (2) to three (3) parking spaces underneath. The existing 600 s.f. storage structure and garbage and recycling area in the center of the northern portion of the property will be removed. The storage racks will be configured in a circular pattern west of the existing restaurant and storage building, with traffic flow provided inside and along the perimeter of the racks. The boat storage racks are 34 feet in height, with each storage unit being approximately 30.5' wide and providing a 7' high automobile parking space underneath. Three levels of boat storage are provided in each rack. Additional parking areas will be provided adjacent to the existing restaurant and shop, with the remainder of the site parking proposed in the southern portion of the site. Four site access points are provided off of the easterly termination of Main Street, two along the north side and the remaining two along the south side. The southerly access points from Main Street will be gate& Although not specified, it appears as if the site perimeter and areas adjacent to the existing shop and restaurant will be vegetated. As part of the project, the lot surface will consist of a recycled concrete aggregate base and a total of thirty seven (37) 10' x 3' leaching basins are proposed (21 within the northern portion of the property and 16 within the southern portion). The drainage system has been designed to accom~nodate a 2" storm event. The Site Plan indicates that the location of the drainage system may vary based on the location of the existing septic system and location and condition of the existing subsurface drainage system. No additional capacity to the existing sanitary system is proposed and no additional site lighting is proposed. The Site Plan indicates that conditions are based on a survey prepared by Wallace T. Bryan (date unknown) and depicts the location and configuration of the marina basin. From this, it appears as if approximately 20 boat slips are currently maintained; however, the parking data provided on the Site Plan indicates 10 boat slips require parking. Additionally, review of a 2001 aerial photograph reveals a slightly different configuration of mooring piles. Based on parking calculations provided on the Site Plan, a total of 185 parking spaces are required by Town Code. Parking calculation data indicates that a total of 183 parking spaces plus 2 handicapped spaces will be provided; however, review of the Site Plan depicts a total of 183 spaces (including 2 handicapped spaces) are provided (it appears that the number of boat storage parking spaces is deficient by 2 spaces). Additionally, the parking calculation data indicates that 61 of the parking spaces are proposed to be land banked; however review of the Site Plan depicts only 26 of the parking spaces in the southern portion of the site will be constructed, leaving the remaining 80 spaces depicted as land banked parking. Reasons Supporting This Determination: The site has been evaluated in accordance with the Criteria for Determining Significance as contained in SEQRA 6NYCRR Part 617.7 (c). The proposed action has been evaluated through review of the following materials: · the proposed site plan and boat storage rack elevations and brochure, · a Part I Environmental Assessment Form (EAF), · preparation of an Environmental Assessment Review, · preparation of a Part II Environmental Assessment Form, Page 2 of 5 Determination of Significauce Mat-A-Mar by the Bay, LLC ~ New Suffolk Site Plan Application, Southold site shouhl be evaluated. The I~roposed boat storage racks are expected to result i~ negative impacts to aesthetic resources at~d daily operations may negatively q~fect comm~mity charclcler f. A major change in the use of either the quantity or type of energy. The proposed project involves a significant increase in use of fuel operations as utilized by marina patrons. Impacts to localJacilities should be analyzed. g. The creation of a hazard to human health. The proposed project may result in unsafe pedestrian movement throughout the site in addition to use of public streets for site operations. h. A substantial change in the use, or intensity of use, of land including agricultural, open space or recreational resources, or in its capacity to support existing uses. The proposed project significantly increases the intensity o fuse on the site, resulting in potential adverse impacts to traffic, sanitary and water generation/use, water quality, noise and visual resources, community character, as well as health and safety impacts. i. The encouraging or attracting of a large number of people to a place or places for more than a few days, compared to the number of people who would come to such place absent the action. It is not expected that the proposed action would attract a significant number of people for more than a few days; however, it is expected to attract a significant number of people to the area seasonally. j. The creation of a material demand for other actions that would result in one of the above consequences. The proposed project is not expected to create a material demand for other actions that would exacerbate or create other impacts. k. Changes in two or more elements of the environment, no one of which has a significant impact on the environment, but when considered together result in a substantial adverse impact on the environment. The proposed project does not propose a significant physical site alteration; however, the intensity of proposed use may have combined adverse impacts on the environment. 1. Two or more related actions undertaken, funded or approved by an agency, none of which has or would have a significant impact on the environment, but when considered cumulatively would meet one or more of the criteria. There are no other pending projects in the vicinity of the project site which when considered cumulatively with the proposed project would result in significant adverse environmental impacts. 3. The site's sensitive waterfront location and area resources may be affected by the proposed project and insufficient information has been provided in which to accurately assess significant Page 4 of 5 Determination of Significance Mat-A-Mar by the Bay, LLC ~ New Suffolk Site Plan Application, Southold independent site inspection, Planning Board deliberation on materials supplied by the applicant, the consultant, and planning staff. Based upon this thorough review, the Planning Board identified potential significant adverse environmental impacts in connection with the proposed project. Additional supporting findings are provided below. 2. The Criteria for Determining Significance are specifically evaluated with respect to this action, as follows: Substantial adverse change in existing air quality, ground or surface water quality or quantity, traffic or noise levels; increase in solid waste production; a substantial increase in erosion, flooding, leaching or drainage problems. The proposed action may significantly change the subject site such that air quality, groundwater or surface water quality, traffic, noise levels, solid waste production, or flooding, erosion, leaching or drainage problems may occur. Insufficient information has been provided in which to accurately assess these impacts. The removal or destruction of large quantities of vegetation or fauna; substantial interference with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species; impacts on a significant habitat area; substantial adverse impacts on a threatened or endangered species of animal or plant, or the habitat of such a species; or other significant adverse impact to natural resources. The proposed project is not expected to result in a negative impact to the vegetation or fauna found on site. However, proposed site landscaping and buffer areas should be reviewed so that impacts to adjacent properties and overall effect of the buffer areas can be assessed. The impairment of the environmental characteristics of a Critical Environmental Area as designated pursuant to subdivision 617.14(g). The EAF indicates that the subject site is not located within a Critical Environmental Area (CEA). However, due to the sites location on Cutchogue Harbor, potential significant adverse impacts were identified as a result of the proposed project, particularly as relates to water quality, harbor use, and scenic resources. d. The creation of a material conflict with a community's current plans or goals as officially approved or adopted. The proposed project has been evaluated in terms of land use, zoning, and land use plans that establish a community's plans and goals. The overall size and scope of theproject appears to be in conflict with adjoining land uses and zoning. The project's consistency with the New Suffolk Hamlet Study, Local I'Vaterfront Revitalization Program, State Coastal Management Program, etc. should also be evaluated. e. The impairment of the character or quality of important historical, archeological, architectural, or aesthetic resources or of existing community or neighborhood character. The site is associated with historical marine uses and contained the first submarine manufacturing facility and has been utilized commercially since. Potential contamination of the Page 3 of 5 Determination of Significance Mat-A-Mar by the Bay, LLC ~, Ne',',' Suffolk Site Plan Application, Southold environmental impacts that may be associated with the proposed project. impacts do not appear to be minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Anticipated adverse For Further Information Contact: Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chairperson Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: (631) 765-1938 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner, NYSDEC NYSDEC, Regional Office at Stony Brook Town of Southold Supervisor's Office To~vn Clerk of the Town of Southold Town of Southold Secretary to the Planning Board Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals Suffolk County Planning Commission Suffolk County Department of Public Works Suffolk County Department of Health Services New York State Department of Transportation Involved Agencies Citizens for Safe Roads Parties of Interest Attorney for Applicant Applicant PageSof5 New York State DepartmEnt of Environmental Division of Environmental Permits, Region One Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Phone: (631) 444-0365 · FAX: (631) 444-0360 Website: www.dec.state.ny.us May 19, 2006 Patricia Moore 51020 Main Street Southold, NY 11952 Re: Application #1-4738-01008/00008 & #1-4738-01008/00009 Matt-A Mar Marina, 650 First Street, New Suffolk Dear Ms. Moore: Conservat on Denise M. Sheehan Commissioner MAY 2 4 2006 The Department of Environmental Conservation is in receipt of two recent submissions for proposals at your client's above referenced property and we have made the following determinations. First, our records indicate that there are two facilities known as Matt-A-Mar Marina. Discussions in this correspondence refer to the facility located at 650 First Street unless stated otherwise. Your client has a pending Tidal Wetlands application, #1-4738-01008/00008, for a permit to construct new boat storage structures, and to make drainage and parking area improvements. That application has remained incomplete since April 20, 2005. Recently (May 3, 2006) we received a request from you for a No-Jurisdiction determination to replace a septic system on the site. This jurisdictional request cited a 1991 No-Jurisdiction letter issued previously by this department. However, the No-Jurisdiction letter referenced was for another facility known as Matt-A-Mar Marina on Wickham Avenue. In addition, we have reviewed the historical aerial photographs your client submitted and they appear to show that no bulkhead existed southeast of your client's property. It appears that Tidal Wetlands Act (Article 25) jurisdiction extends 300 f~et from the tidal waters (tidal wetlands) onto your client's site. Because your client has not proven that Article 25 jurisdiction is limited on their site a permit is necessary for all upland improvements to the property. Therefore, this request to replace a septic system is being consolidated into the pending application, # 1-4738-01008/00008, because both applications involve proposed upland improvements and segmentation of projects into smaller proposals is contrary to the intent of the regulations. As stated above this application has remained incomplete since April 2005. Your client must submit the following items in order to pursue this application. Page 2 of 3 #1-4738-01008/00008: 1) The application forms submitted state that Matt-A-Mar Marina LLC is the landowner and other documents indicate Love Lane Acquisition Corp. is the landowner. You must clarify ownership of the property and submit proof of ownership and a valid mailing address. 2) Your client must submit a site plan (5 copies) showing apparent high water, apparent low water, vegetated wetland areas should they exist, and all proposed upland work including the proposed boat storage structures, parking area improvements, drainage improvements and proposed septic system replacement. The site plan must depict any proposed filling, amounts of fill, source of fill, grading areas, excavation areas, materials to be used for parking areas and dimensions for all proposed structures. The plans should clearly show which structures are existing and which are proposed. 3) Your client must submit a cross sectional view showing the proposed new septic system a minimum of 2 feet above seasonal high groundwater (SHG) and SHG must be documented by providing test hole data. All proposed stormwater leaching rings must include this same information (see below). 4) The site plan must provide a lot coverage calculation comparing the total upland (non- wetland) area to the area proposed to be covered by new and existing impervious structures or surfaces. If the lot coverage exceeds the 20 % maximum allowed then your client must submit a variance request addressing the items listed in section 661.11. 5) The Tidal Wetlands Land Use Regulations (6NYCRR Part 661) state that any increase in surface water runoff to tidal wetlands must be prevented. If your client is proposing any paved or impervious parking areas then your client must demonstrate that all storm water from a 2.5" rain event will be contained on site by drainage structures. The project plans must include stormwater calculations showing the collection area, amount of stormwater to be collected, and capacities of proposed drainage structures. Be advised, this department will object to any proposed increase in stormwater runoff being discharged to marine waters. 6) This project is being reviewed pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). The Town of Southold has been designated as lead agency. A determination of significance for the purposes of SEQRA are necessary before the application can be considered complete. Be further advised, all new structures are required to be more than 75 feet from the tidal wetland boundary. If any structures are proposed less than 75 feet from the wetland boundary your client must submit a variance request addressing all the items listed in section 661.11. This application will remain incomplete until all the above items are adequately addressed. Page 3 of 3 In addition to the above, on April 24, 2006 this department received an application for a Tidal Wetlands permit to replace existing bulkheads and walkways, construct a new walkway and backfill the bulkheads. This application,//1-4738-01008/00009, is being processed separate from the above application for upland improvements because it appears to be routine bulkhead replacement. However, we find this application to be incomplete for the following items. #1-4738-01008/00009: 1) Your client must submit a site plan (5 copies) that depicts the dimensions of all proposed bulkhead work (lengths, distances, widths), backfill areas, fill storage areas, the apparent high water line, apparent Iow water line and any vegetated wetland areas should they exist. The site plans must clearly show which structures shall remain unchanged and which existing structures are proposed to be replaced. The site plans must also show relevant distances from fixed structures to the proposed new bulkheads and the plans must clearly state whether the bulkheads will be replaced in-place or seaward of the existing structures. 2) Your client must submit a cross section (5 copies) for each section of bulkhead work that is different. The cross sections must show apparent high water, apparent low water, backfill areas and walkways. The cross section must clearly indicate whether the bulkheads will be replaced in-place or seaward of the existing structures, and the distance between new and existing bulkheads must be clearly shown. This application will remain incomplete until all the above items are adequately addressed. Additional items may be requested subsequent to our inspection and technical review. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (631) 444-0374 if you have any questions or you wish to discuss this matter further. Sincerely, Mark Carrara Deputy Permit Administrator CC: Matt-A-Mar Marina LLC Town of Southold Interested Citizens file Timothy J. Hopkins General Counsel SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY Administrative Offices: 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, NY 11769-0901 (631) 563-0236 Fax (631) 563-0370 May 15, 2006 Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chairperson Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box t 179 Southold, NY 11971 Rel Matt-a-Mar by the Bay - SCTM# 100-117-8-18 Site Plan Application Dear Ms. Woodhouse: Our office is in receipt of the enclosed Determination of Significance for the project known as Matt- a-Mar by the Bay. Kindly forward a copy of the Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) and site plan so that our agency may review the proposal and provide comments accordingly. Please forward these documents to my attention at 4060 Suurise Highway, Oakdale NY 11769. That& you. Very truly yours. ~Kimberly KemiedS~ Assistant to General Counsel Erie. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SEQR POSITIVE DECLARATION Determination of Significance Notice of Determination of Significance Lead Agency: Contact. Address: Town of Southold Planning Board Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Date: April 28, 2006 This notice is issued pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review - SEQR) of the Environmental Conservation Law and Chapter 44 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will have a significant effect on the environment. This determination provides a description of the proposed project and outlines the considerations of the Board in making this determination: Title of Action: Mat-A-Mar by the Bay, LLC ~ New Suffolk SEQR Status: Unlisted Action Location: The site is located on the east side of First Street, approximately 32 feet south of King Street in New Suffolk, Town of Southold, NY. The site is 3.25 acres in size (2.94 acres above mean high water) and is located within the Marine II (M-II) zoning district. SCTMNo.: 1000-117-08-18 Brief Description of the Proposed Action: The proposed action involves a site plan application for the construction of 17 boat racks with a 153 boat capacity (9 boats per rack) totaling 7,572 s.f., as well as the maintenance of an existing restaurant and storage building. As stated above, the upland portion of the site totals 2.94 acres in size and the site is located in the Town of Southold's M-Il zoning district. Determination of Significance Mat-A-Mar by the Bay, LLC ~ New Suffolk Site Plan Application, Southold As depicted on the Site Plan, all of the proposed boat racks will be located in the northern portion of the site and each will contain two (2) to three (3) parking spaces underneath. The existing 600 s.f. storage structure and garbage and recycling area in the center of the northern portion of the property will be removed. The storage racks will be configured in a circular pattern west of the existing restaurant and storage building, with traffic flow provided inside and along the perimeter of the racks. The boat storage racks are 34 feet in height, with each storage unit being approximately 30.5' wide and providing a 7' high automobile parking space underneath. Three levels of boat storage are provided in each rack. Additional parking areas will be provided adjacent to the existing restaurant and shop, with the remainder of the site parking proposed in the southern portion of the site. Four site access points are provided off of the easterly termination of Main Street, two along the north side and the remaining two along the south side. The southerly access points from Main Street will be gated. Although not specified, it appears as if the site perimeter and areas adjacent to the existing shop and restaurant will be vegetated. As part of the project, the lot surface will consist of a recycled concrete aggregate base and a total of thirty seven (37) 10' x 3' leaching basins are proposed (21 within the northern portion of the property and 16 within the southern portion). The drainage system has been designed to accommodate a 2" storm event. The Site Plan indicates that the location of the drainage system may vary based on the location of the existing septic system and location and condition of the existing subsurface drainage system. No additional capacity to the existing sanitary system is proposed and no additional site lighting is proposed. The Site Plan indicates that conditions are based on a survey prepared by Wallace T. Bryan (date unknown) and depicts the location and configuration of the marina basin. From this, it appears as if approximately 20 boat slips are currently maintained; however, the parking data provided on the Site Plan indicates 10 boat slips require parking. Additionally, review of a 2001 aerial photograph reveals a slightly different configuration of mooring piles. Based on parking calculations provided on the Site Plan, a total of 185 parking spaces are required by Town Code. Parking calculation data indicates that a total of 183 parking spaces plus 2 handicapped spaces will be provided; however, review of the Site Plan depicts a total of 183 spaces (including 2 handicapped spaces) are provided (it appears that the number of boat storage parking spaces is deficient by 2 spaces). Additionally, the parking calculation data indicates that 61 of the parking spaces are proposed to be land banked; however review of the Site Plan depicts only 26 of the parking spaces in the southern portion of the site will be constructed, leaving the remaining 80 spaces depicted as land banked parking. Reasons Supporting This Determination: 1. The site has been evaluated in accordance with the Criteria for Determining Significance as contained in SEQRA 6NYCRR Part 617.7 (c). The proposed action has been evaluated through review of the following materials: · the proposed site plan and boat storage rack elevations and brochure, · a Part 1 Environmental Assessment Form (EAF), · preparation of an Environmental Assessment Review, · preparation of a Part II Environmental Assessment Form, Page 2 of 5 Determination of Significance Mat-A-Mar by the Bay, LLC ~ New Suffolk Site Plan Application, Southold independent site inspection, Planning Board deliberation on materials supplied by the applicant, the consultant, and planning staff. Based upon this thorough review, the Planning Board identified potential significant adverse environmental impacts in co~mection with the proposed project. Additional supporting findings are provided below. 2. The Criteria for Determining Significance are specifically evaluated with respect to this action, as follows: Substantial adverse change in existing air quality, ground or surface water quality or quantity, traffic or noise levels; increase in solid waste production; a substantial increase in erosion, flooding, leaching or drainage problems. The proposed action may significantly change the subject site such that air quality, groundwater or surface water quality, traffic, noise levels, solM waste production, or flooding, erosion, leaching or drainage problems may occur. Insufficient information has been provided in which to accurately assess these impacts. The removal or destruction of large quantities of vegetation or fauna; substantial interference with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species; impacts on a significant habitat area; substantial adverse impacts on a threatened or endangered species of animal or plant, or the habitat of such a species; or other significant adverse impact to natural resources. The proposed project is not expected to result in a negative impact to the vegetation or fauna found on site. However, proposed site landscaping and buffer areas shouM be reviewed so that impacts to adjacent properties and overall effect of the buffer areas can be assessed c. The impairment of the environmental characteristics of a Critical Environmental Area as designated pursuant to subdivision 617.14(g). The EAF indicates that the subject site is not located within a Critical Environmental Area (CEA). However, due to the sites location on Cutchogue Harbor, potential significant adverse impacts were identified as a result of the proposed project, particularly as relates to water quality, harbor use, and scenic resources. d. The creation of a material conflict with a community's current plans or goals as officially approved or adopted. The proposed project has been evaluated in terms of land use, zoning, and land use plans that establish a community's plans and goals. The overall size and scope of the project appears to be in conflict with adjoining land uses and zoning. The project's consistency with the New Suffolk Hamlet Study, Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, State Coastal Management Program, etc. shouM also be evaluated. e. The impairment of the character or quality of important historical, archeological, architectural, or aesthetic resources or of existing community or neighborhood character. The site is associated with historical marine uses and contained the first submarine manufacturing facility and has been utilized commercially since. Potential contamination of the Page 3 of 5 Determination of Significance Mat-A-Mar by the Bay, LLC ~ New Suffolk Site Plan Application, Southold site should be evaluated. The proposed boat storage racks are expected to result in negative impacts to aesthetic resources and daily operations may negatively effect community character. f. A major change in the use of either the quantity or type of energy. The proposed project involves a significant increase in use of fuel operations as utilized by mar/na patrons, lmpacts to local facilities should be analyzed. g. The creation of a hazard to human health. The proposed project may result in unsafe pedestrian movement throughout the site in addition to use of public streets for site operations. h. A substantial change in the use, or intensity of use, of land including agricultural, open space or recrealional resources, or in its capacity to support existing uses. The proposed project significantly increases the intensity o fuse on the site, resulting in polential adverse impacts to traffic, sanitary and water generation/use, water quality, noise and visual resources, community character, as well as health and safety impacts. i. The encouraging or attracting ora large number of people to a place or places for more than a few days, compared to the number of people who would come to such place absent the action. It is not expected that the proposed action wouM attract a significant number of people for more than a few days; however, it is expected to attract a significant number of people to the area seasonally. The creation of a material demand for other actions that would result in one of the above consequences. The proposed project is not expected to create a material demand for other actions that would exacerbate or create other impacts. k. Changes in two or more elements of the environment, no one of which has a significant impact on the environment, but when considered together result in a substantial adverse impact on the environment. The proposed project does not propose a significant physical site alteration; however, the intensity of proposed use may have combined adverse impacts on the environment. 1. Two or more related actions tmdertaken, funded or approved by an agency, none of which has or would have a significant impact on the environment, but when considered cumulatively would meet one or more of the criteria. There are no other pending projects in the vicinity of the project site which when considered cumulatively with the proposed project would result in significant adverse environmental impacts. The site's sensitive waterfront location and area resources may be affected by the proposed project and insufficient information has been provided in which to accurately assess significant Page 4 of 5 Determination of Significance Mat-A-Mar by the Bay, LLC ~ New Suffolk Site Plan Application, Southold environmental impacts that rnay be associated wilh the proposed project. impacts do not appear to be minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Anticipated adverse For Further Information Contact: lerilyn Woodhouse, Chairperson Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: (631) 765-1938 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner, NYSDEC NYSDEC, Regional Office at Stony Brook Town of Southold Supervisor's Office Town Clerk of the Town of Southold Town of Southold Secretary to the Planning Board Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals Suffolk County Planning Commission Suffolk County Department of Public Works Suffolk County Department of Health Services New York State Department of Transportation Involved Agencies Citizens for Safe Roads Parties of Interest Attorney for Applicant Applicant PageSof5 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 May 9, 2006 Mrs. Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Proposed Amended Site Plan of Matt-a Mar by the Bay Located at e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street known as 650 First Street in New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Zone M-II Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, May 8, 2006: WHEREAS, This application for site plan approval proposes 17 boat racks storing 9 boats per rack for a total of 153 boat capacity, 10 wet boat slips, use of an existing restaurant and storage building on a 3.25 acre parcel in the Mil Zone located at e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street also known as 650 First Street located in New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18; and WHEREAS, pursuant to NYSCRR Regulations Part 617 (SEQR), on May 11, 2005, the Town of Southold Planning Board informed the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation that the Town of Southold Planning Board established itself as Lead Agency for the proposed action; and WHEREAS, on August 5, 2005 the applicant's agent submitted a request that the determination of significance remain open; and WHEREAS, the Town of Southold Planning Board agreed to hold the determination of significance open to April 24th, 2006 and the date has passed with no new supplemental information submitted by the applicant agent; therefore be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, established itself as lead agency, and be it further RESOLVED, The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has reviewed the report titled Environmental Assessment Review Environmental and Planninq Considerations Matt-A -Mar By the Bay, LLC ~ New Suffolk prepared by Nelson, Pope and Voorhis, LLC, and be it further Matt-a Mar by the Bay Paqe Two May 9, 2006 RESOLVED, that because the proposed action may have a significant impact on the environment the Town of Southold Planning Board hereby adopts a Positive Declaration for the proposed action, and be it further RESOLVED, that pursuant to Article 617.8, scoping will be required for the action, and be it further RESOLVED, pursuant to Article 617.13 of the 6NYCC, Part 617 State Environmental Quality Review Act the applicant will be financially responsible for costs incurred for the review and website posting of the draft and final Environmental Impact Statements by the Town of Southold. Enclosed is a copy of the Positive Declaration dated April 28, 2006 for your records. Additionally, as indicated above, scoping shall be required for the action. Please provide a draft scope for distribution to all involved agencies. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Chairperson enc. cc: Scott A. Russell, Supervisor Southold Town Board Patricia Finnegan, Town Attorney Kieran Corcoran, Assistant Town Attorney Melissa Spiro, Southold Town Land Preservation Coordinator Steve Resler, New York Department of State Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Conservation Advisory Committee Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning Suffolk County Water Authority New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany Environmental Notice Bulletin Charles Voorhis, Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SEQR POSITIVE DECLARATION Determination of Significance Notice of Determination of Significance Lead Agency; Town of Southold Planning Board Contact: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Town of Southold Planning Board Address: Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Date: April 28, 2006 This notice is issued pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review - SEQR) of the Environmental Conservation Law and Chapter 44 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will have a significant effect on the environment. This determination provides a description of the proposed project and outlines the considerations of the Board in making this determination: Title o fAction: Mat-A-Mar by the Bay, LLC ~ New Suffolk SEQR Status: Unlisted Action Location: The site is located on the east side of First Street, approximately 32 feet south of King Street in New Suffolk, Town of Southold, NY. The site is 3.25 acres in size (2.94 acres above mean high water) and is located within the Marine Il (M-II) zoning district. SCTMNo.: 1000-117-08-18 Brief Description of the Proposed Action: The proposed action involves a site plan application for the construction of 17 boat racks with a 153 boat capacity (9 boats per rack) totaling 7,572 s.f., as well as the maintenance of an existing restaurant and storage building. As stated above, the upland portion of the site totals 2.94 acres in size and the site is located in the Town of Southold's M-Il zoning district. Determination of Significance Mat-A-Mar by the Bay, LLC ~ New Suffolk Site Plan Application, Southold As depicted on the Site Plan, all of the proposed boat racks will be located in the northern portion of the site and each will contain two (2) to three (3) parking spaces underneath. The existing 600 s.fi storage structure and garbage and recycling area in the center of the northern portion of the property will be removed. The storage racks will be configured in a circular pattern west of the existing restaurant and storage building, with traffic flow provided inside and along the perimeter of the racks. The boat storage racks are 34 feet in height, with each storage unit being approximately 30.5' wide and providing a 7' high automobile parking space underneath. Three levels of boat storage are provided in each rack. Additional parking areas will be provided adjacent to the existing restaurant and shop, with the remainder of the site parking proposed in the southern portion of the site. Four site access points are provided off of the easterly termination of Main Street, two along the north side and the remaining two along the south side. The southerly access points from Main Street will be gated. Although not specified, it appears as if the site perimeter and areas adjacent to the existing shop and restaurant will be vegetated. As part of the project, the lot surface will consist of a recycled concrete aggregate base and a total of thirty seven (37) 10' x 3' leaching basins are proposed (21 within the northern portion of the property and 16 within the southern portion). The drainage system has been designed to accommodate a 2" storm event. The Site Plan indicates that the location of the drainage system may vary based on the location of the existing septic system and location and condition of the existing subsurface drainage system. No additional capacity to the existing sanitary system is proposed and no additional site lighting is proposed. The Site Plan indicates that conditions are based on a survey prepared by Wallace T. Bryan (date unknown) and depicts the location and configuration of the marina basin. From this, it appears as if approximately 20 boat slips are currently maintained; however, the parking data provided on the Site Plan indicates 10 boat slips require parking. Additionally, review ora 2001 aerial photograph reveals a slightly different configuration of mooring piles. Based on parking calculations provided on the Site Plan, a total of 185 parking spaces are required by Town Code. Parking calculation data indicates that a total of 183 parking spaces plus 2 handicapped spaces will be provided; however, review of the Site Plan depicts a total of 183 spaces (including 2 handicapped spaces) are provided (it appears that the number of boat storage parking spaces is deficient by 2 spaces). Additionally, the parking calculation data indicates that 61 of the parking spaces are proposed to be land banked; however review of the Site Plan depicts only 26 of the parking spaces in the southern portion of the site will be constructed, leaving the remaining 80 spaces depicted as land banked parking. Reasons Supporting This Determination: The site has been evaluated in accordance with the Criteria for Determining Significance as contained in SEQRA 6NYCRR Part 617.7 (c). The proposed action has been evaluated through review of the following materials: · the proposed site plan and boat storage rack elevations and brochure, · a Part I Environmental Assessment Form (EAF), · preparation of an Environmental Assessment Review, · preparation ora Part II Environmental Assessment Form, Page 2 of 5 Determination of Significance Mat-A-Mar by the Bay, LLC ~ New Suffolk Site Plan Application, Southold independent site inspection, Planning Board deliberation on materials supplied by the applicant, the consultant, and planning staff. Based upon this thorough review, the Planning Board identified potential significant adverse environmental impacts in connection with the proposed project. Additional supporting findings are provided below. 2. The Criteria for Determining Significance are specifically evaluated with respect to this action, as follows: Substantial adverse change in existing air quality, ground or surface water quality or quantity, traffic or noise levels; increase in solid waste production; a substantial increase in erosion, flooding, leaching or drainage problems. The proposed action may significantly change the subject site such that air quality, groundwater or surface water quality, traffic, noise levels, solM waste production, or flooding, erosion, leaching or drainage problems may occur. Insufficient information has been provided in which to accurately assess these impacts. The removal or destruction of large quantities of vegetation or fauna; substantial interference with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species; impacts on a significant habitat area; substantial adverse impacts on a threatened or endangered species of animal or plant, or the habitat of such a species; or other significant adverse impact to natural resources. The proposed project is not expected to result in a negative impact to the vegetation or fauna found on site. However, proposed site landscaping and buffer areas should be reviewed so that impacts to adjacent properties and overall effect of the buffer areas can be assessed. c. The impairment of the environmental characteristics of a Critical Environmental Area as designated pursuant to subdivision 617.14(g). The EAF indicates that the subject site is not located within a Critical Environmental Area (CEA). However, due to the sites location on Cutchogue Harbor, potential significant adverse impacts were identified as a result of the proposed project, particularly as relates to water quality, harbor use, and scenic resources. d. The creation of a material conflict with a community's current plans or goals as officially approved or adopted. The proposed project has been evaluated in terms of land use, zoning, and land use plans that establish a community's plans and goals. The overall size and scope of the project appears to be in conflict with adjoining land uses and zoning. The project's consistency with the New Suffolk Hamlet Study, Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, State Coastal Management Program, etc. shouM also be evaluated. e. The impairment of the character or quality of important historical, archeological, architectural, or aesthetic resources or of existing community or neighborhood character. The site is associated with historical marine uses and contained the first submarine manufacturing facility and has been utilized commercially since. Potential contamination of the Page 3 of 5 Determination of Significance Mat-A-Mar by the Bay, LLC ~ New Suffolk Site Plan Application, Southold site should be evaluated. The proposed boat storage racks are expected to result in negative impacts to aesthetic resources and daily operations may negatively effect community character. f. A major change in the use of either the quantity or type of energy. The proposed project involves a significant increase in use of fuel operations as utilized by marinapatrons. Impactstolocalfacilitiesshouldbeanalyzed. g. The creation of a hazard to human health. The proposed project may result in unsafe pedestrian movement throughout the site in addition to use of public streets for site operations. h. A substantial change in the use, or intensity of use, of land including agricultural, open space or recreational resources, or in its capacity to support existing uses. The proposed project significantly increases the intensity of use on the site, resulting in potential adverse impacts to traffic, sanitary and water generation/use, water quality, noise and visual resources, community character, as well as health and safety impacts. i. The encouraging or attracting of a large number of people to a place or places for more than a few days, compared to the number of people who would come to such place absent the action. It is not expected that the proposed action would attract a significant number of people for more than a few days; however, it is expected to attract a significant number of people to the area seasonally. j. The creation of a material demand for other actions that would result in one of the above consequences. The proposed project is not expected to create a material demand for other actions that would exacerbate or create other impacts. Changes in two or more elements of the environment, no one of which has a significant impact on the environment, but when considered together result in a substantial adverse impact on the environment. The proposed project does not propose a significant physical site alteration; however, the intensity of proposed use may have combined adverse impacts on the environment. Two or more related actions undertaken, funded or approved by an agency, none of which has or would have a significant impact on the environment, but when considered cumulatively would meet one or more of the criteria. There are no other pending projects in the vicinity of the project site which when considered cumulatively with the proposed project would result in significant adverse environmental impacts. The site's sensitive waterfront location and area resources may be affected by the proposed project and insufficient information has been provided in which to accurately assess significant Page 4 of 5 Determination of Significance Mat-A-Mar by the Bay, LLC ~ New Suffolk Site Plan Application, Southold environmental impacts that may be associated with the proposed project. impacts do not appear to be minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Anticipated adverse For Further Information Contact: Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chairperson Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: (631) 765-1938 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner, NYSDEC NYSDEC, Regional Office at Stony Brook Town of Southold Supervisor's Office Town Clerk of the Town of Southold Town of Southold Secretary to the Planning Board Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals Suftblk County Planning Commission Suffolk County Department of Public Works Suffolk County Department of Health Services New York State Department of Transportation Involved Agencies Citizens for Safe Roads Parties of Interest Attorney for Applicant Applicant Page 5 of 5 New York State Departm t of Environmental Conserv on Division of Environmental Permits, Region One Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Phone: (631) 444-0365 , FAX: (631)444-0360 Website: www.dec.state.ny.us Abigail Wickham Wickham, Bressler, Gordon & Geasa, P.C. PO Box 1424 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re~ Application # 1-4738-01008/00008 Matt-A-Mar By the Bay LLC April 21, 2006 Denise M. Sheehan Commissioner APR 25 2OO6 . Dear Ms. Wickham: This is in response to your letter dated April 18, 2006 requesting continents regarding mitigation measures to protect groundwater and surface water, and expressing concern regarding the SEQRA review process. As you know, all agencies within New York State must comply with State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). While SEQRA is part of the Environmental Conservation Law (ECL), the Department of Environmental Conservation is not responsible for enfoming SEQRA. If you believe that SEQRA has not been complied with you may file an Article 78 complaint against the lead agency. The SEQRA regulations, section 617.6(b)(3)(iii), state "The determination of significance issued by the lead agency following coordinated review is binding on all other involved agencies." In this case a SEQRA coordination was performed and the Southold Board of Trustees has been designated as lead agency. Therefore, this department must abide by the Town's SEQRA determinations in this matter. At this time we cannot respond to your inquiry regarding mitigation measures to protect groundwater and surface water because the project sponsor's application for permit has remained incomplete since April 20, 2005 (copy enclosed). We cannot comment appropriately with insufficient facts and information about the project. If the department receives all the requested information from the project sponsor, we will conduct an inspection and review of the proposal to determine~£the r>roiec~[ ~om~i~s with. t~._ Tidal Wetlands Land Use Regulations (6NYCRR Part 661.~~'r~'' ~'ha~''~'" '. ' ;"~" ~' ~ ~'~-~: Please do not hesitate to contact me at (631) 444-0374 if you have any questions or you wish to discuss this matter further. Sincerely, Mark Carrara Deputy Permit Administrator Town of Southold, Board of Trustees Matt-A Mar By the Bay, LLC file New York State Departm of Environmental Conserv on Division of Environmental Permits, Region One Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Phone: (631)444-0365 · FAX: (631)444-0360 Web$1te: www.dec.state.ny.us NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION Denise M. Sheehan Acting Commissioner April20,2005 Patricia C. Moore 51020 Main Road $outhold, New York 11971 Re: Application #1-4738-01008/00008 Matt-A-Mar by the Bay, LLC, Property, 650 First Street, SCTM ~!0.00-11%8-18 Dear Ms. Moore: The Department of Environmental Conservation has preliminarily reviewed your client's application for a Tidal Wetlands permit to construct parking area and boat storage and install drainage structures and we find it deficient for the following items/information. 1) Suffolk County Tax Records indicate that Love Lane Acquisition Corp. is the owner of the parcel. Please confirm that Matt-A-Mar by the Bay, LLC. is the new owner, not the contract vendee. If Matt-A-Mar by the Bay, LLC. is the contract vendee, please submit authorization from the current owner. 2) The applicant's telephone number. 3)Two copies of a signed, stamped survey. 4) The site plan (Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan) must show the correct name of the property owner-the site plan says Matt-A-Mar Marina Inc., Love Lane Acquisition Corp and the application form says Matt-A-Mar by the Bay, LLC, Michael Raynor-which is correct?; the name of the facility must also be shown-is it Cove View Marina or something else?; dimensions of the proposed work areas, grade changes, excavation, filling, and clearing; existing and proposed contours; the source, type and volume of material to be placed or removed; all existing structures must be shown (ie: existing boat storage and parking); all proposed Structures must be labeled- are both the north and south parking areas proposed?; and show the dimensions and types of materials for all proposed structures. 5) The site plan (Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan) must also show'the tidal wetland boundary; the line of apparent high water; the line of apparent low water; the percent adjacent area lot coverage data of existing and proposed structures; the size of all proposals; the nature of the surface of the existing and proposed parking areas; the test hole location, date and time; and the test hole data, including distance to groundwater; existing drywells to be removed must be labeled as such; the existing wood retaining wall to be removed must be labeled as such; the proposed boat storage building and office must be shown; the proposed sanitary system must be shown. 6) The Tidal Wetlands Land Use Regulations [6NYCRR Part 661.6(a)(1)] require structures to be located a minimum of 75 feet from any tidal wetlands. If your client's parking areas are proposed less than 75 feet from the tidal wetland boundary, your client's proposal will require a variance from the development restrictions of section 661.6. Additionally, the regulations allow no more than 20% of the upland area of a lot to be covered with new and existing structures (including all impervious surfaces). If your client proposes to cover more than 20% of the lot with existing and new structures, the maximum permissible lot coverage would be exceeded. In that instance, your client's proposal would require a variance from the development restrictions of Part 661.6. Part 661.12 (a) states "The burden of showing that a variance to such provisions should be granted shall rest entirely on the applicant". The following items must be addressed and/or submitted in order to complete an application for a variance: A written request specifying, which element(s) of the development restrictions relief is sought from, the minimum relief that is necessary, the practical difficulties claimed, a discussion of alternate site possibilities, a discussion of change.of project objective possibilities and a discussion of environmental impact reduction and/or mitigation measures to be employed. A plan (5 copies) showing the minimum variance necessary and all mitigation and impact reduction measures. 7) Tidal Wetlands Regulations (6NYCRR Part 661) state that any increase in surface water runoff to tidal waters must be prevented from directly running into any such waters by the utilization of sufficient runoff control measures (i.e. retention basins, detention basins, leaching pools...). Any proposed storm water runoff drainage structures must be designed and constructed to recharge, leach, or retain the storm water runoff produced on the project site by a five-year storm. You must submit existing and proposed drainage calculations that show the amount of runoff to tidal waters will not increase due to the proposed project. 8) A crossview of the proposed sanitary system including the structural component dimensions. 9) The project is being reviewed pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQR). A designation of lead agency and a determination of significance for the purposes of SEQR are necessary before your application can be considered complete. Enclosed is an application checklist for your assistance. This application will remain incomplete until all the above items are submitted and or addressed adequately. Please do not hesitate to call me at (631) 444-0351 if you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter further. Enclosure Sincerely, Naomi Handell Environmental Analyst CC: Matt-A-Mar by the Bay, LLC file Semon, Bruno To; Cc: Subject: PB Members, mt Ford, Amy Mat-A-Mar by the Bay May 8, 2006 meeting Hi Mark, Be advise a letter was faxed and sent out to NPV today requesting a determination, additionally I telephone Marissa at NPV's Office to indicate the position of the PB. The request to NPV was that they issue a recommendation of the SEQR determination to the PB by May 4, 2006. The site plan file is in the Planning Board meeting box waiting for the declaration resolution to be written by you. Please advise me what else I need to do before the hearing on May 8, 2006. Thanks Bruno PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND April 25, 2006 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC. 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, NY 11747-2188 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Mat-A-Mar By the Bay 650 First Street, New Suffolk SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Dear Mr. Voorhis, The Planning Board held a work on April 24, 2006 to review the above-mentioned application and the NPV report dated July 5, 2005. The Planning Board has kept the review open pending submission of supplemental information. As of the date of this letter the Planning Department office has received no supplemental information. At this time the Planning Board would like to issue a SEQRA determination at the May 8, 2006 public heating. Please submit to the Planning Department a recommendation for a SEQRA determination prior to May 4, 2006, it would be appreciated. For your information the Planning Board started the SEQRA process on March 14, 2005 with an Unlisted Coordinated review and the Planning Board assumed lead agency on May 9, 2005. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file, mt, pb M. at-~-Mar BF Tile Bay, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT RIIVIEW ENVIRONMI~NTAL AND PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS MAT-A-MAR BY THE BAY, LLC ,~ N~w SUFI~OLK Prepared for: Btv. no Semen, Semor Site Plan Reviewer Town of $outhold Planning Board, Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southolcl, New York 11971-0959 Prepared by: Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville. New York 11747 Date: July 5, 2005 Tlxe Town of Southold Planning Board has retained Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC (N-P&V) for consulting servicea in revi~v of the above referenced project. The proposed action ira*elves a sit* plan applicatio~ for the construction of 17 boat racks with a 153 boat capacity (9 boat~ per rack) totaling 7,572 sr. as well as the maintenance of an existing restaurant and storage building on a 3.25 acre parcel m the M-II Zone located on the east side of First Street, approximately 32 fe¢t south of King Street in New Suffolk, Town of Southold, NY. The project site can be more particularly described as SCTM #1000-117-08-18. The Lot Coverage Site Plan has been prepared by East End Design Associates~ LLC, dated 01-18-OA, last revised 11-30-04. The site is currently occupied by a 1,569 s.f restaurmxt, a 1,389 s.f. boat shop, and an approximately 600 s.f. storage building with adjacent garbage and recycling facilities, with the bulk of the remainder of the property being utilized for boat storage. The site also contains a forklift loading area and associated manna facilities [containing roulghly 20 boat ~llps). This document analyzes the site and area resources including topography, soils, water, land zoning and Iraxtgportation and other available information. The site has also been inspmt*d for environmental/planning constraints. The EAF Part I submitted with the application should be corrected and resubmitted along with the Coastal Consistency Review as requested by the Town on May 25, 2003. In addition, an EAF Part 1I has been pre~ared and is included herein. Mat-a-Mar By The [lay. LLC ~ l~ov Saff01k NP&V No, 05210 Location and Sit~ Overview The overall project site is depicted as being 3.25 acres in size. with the Site Plan indicating a site area of 2.94 acres located above mean liigh water, Thc site is located on the east side of First Street, approximately 32 feet south of King Street in Ne~v Suffolk, Town of Southold, NrY. The project site ~ be more partieaiarly described as SCTM #1000-117-08-18. The easterly exten,/on of Main Street partially bisects the center of the property. Thc parcel contains a total of approximately 480 feet of frontage on First Street along the western perimeter with the east per, meter abutting Cutehogue Harbor. The site is currently occupied by a 1,569 s~f. restaurant, a 1,389 s.f. boat shop, and an approximately 600 s.f. storage building with adjacent garbage and recycling facilities, with the bulk of the remainder of the property being utilized for boat storage. The site also contains a forklift loading area and associated marina facilities (containing roughly 20 boat slips). The northern portion of the site abutting Catchogue Harbor is bulkheaded and contains a hook pier and jetty which encapsulates the marina basin and the southern portion of the site consists of a sand beach. Vegetated tidal wetlands do not appear to be present on site. The site is depicted on the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (NYS OPRItP) Cia:les and Squares Map ~s being located within or adjacent to an area containing multiple site sensitivity. The subject property has h~storical value in that it contained the first submarine manufacturing facility; site history should be further evaluated, 'this review will discuss the proposed project and its potential impact on the environmental resources of the site, Proposed Prgi,ct The proposed action involves a site plan application for the construction of 17 boat racks with a 153 boat capacity (9 boats per rack) totaling 7,572 s,f., as well as the maintenance of ;m existing restaurant and storage bailding As stated above, the upland portion of the site totals 2.94 acres in size and the site is located in the Town of Sou~old's M-II zoning district. As depicted on the Site Pla~ all of the proposed bom racks will be located in the northern portion of the site and each will contain two (2) to three (3) parking spaces underneath The existing 600 s.f. storage structure and garbage and recycling area in the center of the northern portion of the property will be removed. The storage racks will be configured in a circular paU~rn west of the existing restaurant and storag: building, with traffic flow provided inside and along the perimeter of the racks. The boat storage racks are 34 feet in height, with each storage unit being approximately 30.5' wide and providing a 7' high automobile parking space andexneath. Three levels of boat storage are provided in each rack. The applicant should specify whether roofs and/or sides will be provided for each unit as depicted as option boat rack features on the brochure provided. Additionally, the a/Jpllcant should indicate how future garbage and racyclingfacditie$ will be handled. Additional paxkJng areas will be provided adjacent to the existing restaurant and shop. with the remainder of the site parking proposed in the southern portion of the site. Four site access points are provided off of the easterly termination of Main Street, ~'o along the north side and the r~maining two along thc south side. Ire southerly access poims from Main Street will be gated. Page 2 ~'ct ~SE~ SE~ 9~G d]]'B~O~'NOS]BN E~':80 M at-~-Mar ~y Tine Bay, LLC ~ N~w Suffolk EAF I'art I R~ti~ NP&V No. 0S2!0 Although not specified, it appears as if the site perimeter and areas adjacent to the existing shop and restaurant will be landscaped, The applicant should provida a landscape plan detailing the location and type of plant materials, etc. so that the level and type of landscaping provided and overall effect of the buffer areas may be assessed As part of the proj cci, the proposed lot surface will consist of a recycled concrete ag~egate base and a tot21 o/' thirty seven (37) 10' x 3' leaching basins are prol~osed (21 within the northern portion of the property and 16 within the southern portio~t). The drainage system has been designed to accommodate a 2" storm event. The Site Plan indicates that the Ieee'ach vi' the drainage system may vary based on the location of the existing septic system and location and condition of the existing subsurface drainage system. No additional capacity to the existing sanitary system and no additional si~e lighting am proposed. The applicant should provide information on the location of the existing drainage and sanitary system, indicating structures to remain erich'or be removed, so the overall drainage design and capaci¢ can be evaluated. Additionally, the applicant should provid~ te~t hole locations and data, in additian to a detailed grading plan, to determln~ If sufficient depth ~o groundwamr exists to accommodate the drainage structures proposed. ,4 drainage easement with the Town exists through rhe prop*rty; the location and any conditions of this easement should be depicted on t3e Site Plan. l'he Site Plan indicates that conditions are based on a survey prepared by Wallace T. Bryan (date unknown) and depicts the location and configuration of the marina basin, From th~s, it appears as if approximately 20 boat slips are currently maintained; however, the parking data provided on the Site Plan indicates 10 boat slips require parking. The apph'cant should indicate ho~v restrictions are placed on the remamtng 10 slips that are used for r~staurant visitors arriving by boat. Additionally, review of a 2001 aerial photograph r~veals a slightly different contlb, uration of mooring piles. The applicant should provide and/or verifj the most recent configuration of the marina basin and associated pites and clarify the number of boat slips maintained. Based on patting calculations provided on the Site Plan, a total of 185 parking spaces are required by Town Code. Parking calculation data indicates that a total of 183 parking spaces plus 2 handicapped spaces will be provided; however, review of the Site Plan depicts a total of 183 spaces (including 2 handicapped spaces) are provided (it appears that the numb~ of boat storage parking spaces is deficient by 2 spaces). Additionally, the parking calculation data indic~es that 61 of the parking spaces are proposed to be land banked; however review of the Site Plan depicts only 26 of the parking spaces in thc southern portion of the site will be constructed, l~aving the remaining 80 spaces depicted as /and banked parking. The applicant shauld revise the Site Plan to indicate the location of all parking spaces provided or revise th~ calculations to reflect the same. The Planning Board may wish to determine ~' the parking calculations utilized have been satisfied and if quantity of land banked parking s~.ac~ proposed is sufficient to accommodate post-construction conditions. The applican~ .*hould indicate whether additional boat storage w:ouId be proposed within the southern portion of the lot if the propo~ed parking 8pac~ were land banked. internal site operation,* in terms of ground surface~ and pot~nlml for noise, dust and odors wlth respect to boat lift activity should be documented in terms qf tlt* pro/eat and operations. Mat-a-Mar By Tl~ Bay, LLC ~ N~w Stfffolk ~ Part ! Revt~. NP&¥ No. {}$21D The proposed curb cuts, l'wo on each side of Main Street seem to show that the north and south sides of the site wilt be linked in terms of equipment movement across 3frOth Street, The exact nature of the operation should be identified so that impacts of thts practice can be axsossed, Land Use and Zoning The project site i$ located in an area that is generally dominated by a mix of commercial and residential uses. The subject site is zoned Marine II (M-II), which requires a minimum lot size of 80,000 s.f., maximum lot coverage of 30% of the lot area, and a minimum landscaped area of 20%. The front yard setback is 25 feet, side yard ~etbaek is 25 feet (50 feet for both), and the rear yard setback is 25 feet. The maximum braiding height is 3: feet, or two (2) ~taries. Permitted uses include existing single family dwellings, marinas, boat docks, slips, piers and wharves for charter boats, beach clubs, yac}~t clubs, or boat clubs, boatyard storage yards including accessory uses, mariculture or aquaculture operations, boat and marine engine repair and sales, municipal buildings, and retail sale or rentals of fishing, diving, or bathing supplies and equipment if accessory to a marina or boatyard. Zoni~g in the immediate vicinity of the subject parcel is comprised of M-II, It-B and R-40, Land use in the area appears to reflect the current zoning regulations. The site plan appears to be in general conformance with the zoning dimensional requirements. However, although the boat storage racks are 34 feet in height, boats stored on the Top reck ~vill exceed the 35 foot maximum height requirement as allowed under the M-Il zoning dimensional requirements. The Planning Board may require a height variance, pamculariy if a roof ts proposed on top of each storage rack unit. Additionally. a visual analysis may be requested due to the height of the boat storage racks and potential impacts on watershed vie~vs of Cutchogue Harbor. The Plarm~ng Board may wish to consider if the number of boats stored on the property can exceed that of the number of boat slips wlthi~ the marina. It is expected that the proposed high and dry storage of boats will be provided for daily use, rather than seasonal storage. The applicant should provMe reformation on the overall operat~on~ of the proposed facility (hours of operafinn, how pump out facilities will be handled, whether fuel storage will be provided, etc.), including that of the existing restaurant and storage buildings, so that impacts of the proposed operation ma>, be adequately addressed. Due to the large number of boat$ proposed for storage on the property, the proposed project ma>' result ir. significant adverse impacts to Cutehogue Harbor, particularly as related to water quality and scenic resources. The applicant should also provide a conststen~ evaluation of the projects eo~formance with the _New Suffolk Hamlet Study, Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, and the State Coastal Management Program. Transportation The proposed use would be expected to increase traffic generation upon full establislmaent of the site as compared to existing conditions due to a significant increase in the number of boats being stored for daily use at the facility. It ~s anticipated that t~is increase in traffic would generally be Mat-a-Mar By The Bay, LLC ~ New Suffolk EAF l~art I Review NP&V No, 0SlI0 seasonal in nat'axe. Impacts as a result of increased traJ~c generation would be expected as a result of high and dry storage where boats wouM be placed into and removed from the water before and after each use in addition to that of the existing restaurant and marina facility. The Planning Board may require a traffic impact analysis lo fitrther evaluate traffic generation and flow. Addmonally, a appears as if the stored boats will have to be transported across Street in order to access the forldifi loading area. The applicant shouM provtde confirmation that use ora Town owned street for tMs purpose ;s permissible. ,4s 153 boats and 77 parking spaces will be provided in the northern portion of the site in conjunction with the existing restaurant use, the Planning Board may wish to have the app?icant provide a safety ana~?sts of movement within the site. The internal site operations are unclear In terms cf manemering within the site, the need for multi'pie curb cuts to the Town right-of-way, access to tho travel lifi area, and general circulation and operation. Soils anal T~oo~avhv The site is relatively flat ~la-oughout, with all existing slopes within the development area generally between approximately 0-10aA. The property does not contain an5, significant landforms or geological features. The Suffolk County soil survey (Warner, 1975) identifies one (1) soil type on the subject site. Cu]~, whioh is described in more detail below: Cut and fill land, gently sloping (C~tB) - This series is comprised of areas that have been cut and filled for nonfarm uses. The area~ generally are large, but some ara*as are about five (5) acres in size. This soil type is comprised of moderately sloping areas that have been grc, ded fbr building sites. Slopes range from I to 8percent. The applicant should revise the Site Plan to indicate the location ora test hole and associated data so that the elevation of groundwater may be more accurately determined, The topography and soils on site do not appear to present severe development constraint,, Wat~ Resources Public water is supplied to the general arcs by private wells. Thc Suffolk County Wa~er Authority (SCWA) is the local water purveyor in the general area, however does not maintain any water mains and/or wells fields in the vicinity. The closest water mains are located New Suffolk Avenue, west of tho site. Based on review of the Site Plan and EAF, no proposed change in water use for the site is proposed. The applicant should specifically indicate how water will be provided to the significant increase in site patron~ and whether additional water ~ill be necessary.' to operate the boat storage yard (boat washing, eta.j. Based on the increased number of boats and resultant site patrons and type of operations proposed, it appears that additional water ,~ae '~t~ouid be necessary. Sanitary disposal will be managed by on.site underground sewage leaching system$~ In 1978, the Long Island Regional Planning Board published the Long Island Comprehensive Waste PaCe Mat-a-Mar By 'l~e B~y, LLC ~ New Suffolk EAF Part 1 R~rie~,v Treatment Management Plan (208 Study). Thc 208 Study identified eight (8) hydrogeologie zon~ in Nassau and Suffolk Cotmties. These zones were distinguished based upon di,Cferenees in tmderlyinl~ groundwater flow patterns and water quality. The subject site is located within SCDHS Groundwater Management Zone IV, which ~ccordlug to A.rti¢le V! of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code, has an allowable flow of 600 gallons pe~ day (gpd) per acre in areas served by public water. Therefore, the allowable nitrogea bearing flow for the overall 2.94 acre site is 1,764 glXl. The aamtary desig~ flow is computed using the SCDHS manual Standards for Approval of Plans and Construction for Sewage DUPosai ,5'ystems for Other Than Single Family Residencez. The existing sanitary system for the restaurant will remain a~id no additional capacity to the exioting system ie proposed. Similar to water use above, while boat storage in and of itself may be considered a 'dry' use, the quantity of site patrons utilizing the site will increase significantly, and therefore would be expected to require additional samtary facilities. The applicant should provide documentation that the existing sanitary system can accommodate the additional flow. Additionally. the applicant should indicate how boats will be pumped out after ~e. There is a shallow depth to groundwater on the subject property; the direction of groundwater flow is expected to be towardg Cutchogu¢ Flarbor. Again, the location of the test hole and associated data, in conjunction with a full grading and drainage plan, should be provided to determine whether the leaching pool will maintain a 3 foot separate dtstance pom groundwater c~ indicated on the Site Plan detai~. Compliance with ~eCDH$ regulations for best management practice in handling toxic and hazardous materialz should be established, applications filed w,ith revolved agencies as appropriate, and impacts of boat use and maintenance assessed. Water resources includes wetlands and surface water; thc site includes NYSDEC mapped tidal wetlands associated with Cutchogue Herbor, Potential impact to surfac~ water resources with respect to wetlands, stormwater handling, and best management practice should be examined and further documented. The jurigdiction of NYSDEC and the Town 7kustees should be established and applications submitted to agencies which are also involved In this project, Potential impact on wetland~ should be determined. .,is part of the LI. FRP review; and consideration of potential impact on l~,ater resources, the ability of local waterways to sustain the proposed boat rac~ installation and increase in recreational boating access to the waterway should be assessed. This may' include depth of water, channel access, waterway utiliaation, fuel accessibility, pumpout statlo~t accessibility and consistency w~th Town planning goals in terra~ or.age of the waterways, Cultural The project will 8isturb and change the character of use of much of the site as a result of structured boat storage for dry ~ail marine access. The histori<al character of the s~te should be Pag~ 6 Mat-a-Mar By Th, Bay? LLC ~ Ntm guffolk EAF Par~ I Review Np&V N~. 0~ll0 considered at this juncture, with doct~mentation of site hdstory, and mitigate'on with re~spect to alteration of the site. There are businesses sad reside.ars in proximity to the site. Activity associated with boat storage, internal transport, launching, etc. should be considered irt terms of noise, dost and odors~ particularly from operation of boat lift eqmpment. SUMMARY In summary, the proposed action involves a site plan application for the construction of 17 boat racks with a 153 boat capacity (9 boats per rack) totaling 7,572 s.f., as well as the maimetaance of an existing restaurant and storage building. The location and size of the subject site and its importance in establishing the character of N~v Suffolk is recognized. Site planning and use should recognize the opportunity ~vhich this site represents lo lhe hamlet of New Suffo',k. Comments herein regarding stormwater, landscaping, visual impacts, cula~rat resources, noise, odors, access, internal site use, wetlands, etc. indicate that careful site planning i~ of utmost importance. Based on the information submitted, the site's sensitive waterfront location and area resources, the proposed project may result in significant impacts and preparation and re¥i~v of addJ, tional information is warranted in cormeetion with this project. Additionally, anticipat~ impacts do not appear to be minimized to the maxim,am extent practicab]e. In view oft,he proposed use, site opportunities and sensitivity, the need for further understanding of the project and potential environmental impacts identified h~ein, ~t is believed that an environmental impact statemeat may be the most appropriate method to evaluate this project. The State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) requires that if one or more potential significant adverse environments', impacts are identified in cormeetion with an action, an environmental impact statement must be prepared. The following summarizes recommendations and potential significant adverse impacts and reconun:ndations for additional in£ormation, that are ider~fified in this review: L The£AFPartl.ntbmiltedwiththeapplicationshouMbecorrectedandsabmittedalongv, tth the Coastal Consistency ]~eview as requested by the Town on May 25. 2005, 2. The subject £roperty has historical value in that it contained the first submarine manufacturing facility. The applicant should speciJ~ whether roof~ and/or side$ ~ilt be provided for each unit as depicted as option boat rack features on the brochure provided. Additionally, the applicant should indicate how future garbage and recycling faci!;ties wdl oe handled. The applicant should provide a landscape plan detailing the ioccaion and type oJ plant materials, otc, so that the level and type of'landscaping provided and the overa[] effect qf the buffer areas may be assessed. The applicant should provide information on the location of the ~xisting drainage and sanitary system, Indicating structures to remain and/or be removed, so the overall drainage 6. Mnt-a-.~n r 87 Yhe 1~ n.~, L£~ ~ New Saffo k E~I~ Part I R~vivw d~ign can be ,valuated. ,4dditionally, the applicant should provid~ test hole locatlon, r and data. Itt addition to a derait~d gradlng plan, to determine if sufficient d~pth, zo grou~tdwater ~:~gt$ to accommodate the drainage structures propose& _~1 drainage easement with the Town e.'dstx through tt~e properO,; the location and any eondttto~s of this easemen~ :houM b~ d~picted on the Site Plan. The applicant should indicate how restrictton~ are placed on the remaining 10 slips that are used excluslve~ for ra.*taurant vlsltors .4ddtttonall, v, revt~u o, f a 2001 aer~a! photograph rev*als a slightly dt,~erent conflguratton of mooring piles. The applicant should provide and/or ver~jy the most rectnt conflguratton of the marina basln and a*soclated plles and clarif)' the number of boat slips maintained. The applicant should revise the Site Plan to indicate the location of all parking provided or revise the calcalatio~ ~o reftect the ~ame. The Planning ~oard may wtsh to determine if the parking ealculatio~ utl'ltz~d have b**n satisfied and if quanti~ of land banked parking spaces proposed is sufficient to accommodate post-cons~'ruction The applicant shoutd mdicat~ wh~ther additional boat storage would be pt'oposed within the southern portton of the lot ¢'th* proposed parlang ~paces were land banked. The Planning Board may requir~ a height variance, particularly iJ a roof is prOposed on top of each storage rack unit Additionally, a visual anaiysi, s ma), be requested due to the height of tt~ boat storage buildings and potential impact, on water~hed ¥ie'n's of Cutchcgue Harbor. The Planning Board may w~h to consider if the number of boats stored on the property can exceed that of the number of boat slips within the martna, [t is expected that the proposed high and dry storage of boats wilt be provided for daily use, rather than secaonal storage. The applicant should pn~vide inJbrmation on the overal~ operations of the proposed facility (hours of Ol~ration. bow pump out facilities will bu handled, whether fuel storage wil! be prov~ded, etcO, including ~hat of the extcting restaurant and storage buildings, so that impacts ~f the prapoa'ed operatton may be adequately addr~sed Due to the large number of boats proposed j~or storage on the property, the proposed project may result in significant adverse impacrs to Cutcbogue Harbor, para'c~larly as relates to water quality, and scenic resources. The applicant should also provide a conrlsten~, ~valuat~on of the projects conformanc~ with tI~* ~x~'~,, SuJfolk Hamlet ~tudy, local ~aterfront .Revitalixazton Pro,'am, and the 3'rate Coc~tal Management Program. The proposed curb cuts, ~o on each side of ,[Iain Street se*tn to show that the north and south sid~s of the site will be lin~d it? term$ of exlui[J*nent mov~ment acro$$ Main St,'eet, The exact nature of the operation should be identified so that impact.r of this practice can be assessed. /n~OactS as a result ojCinereasexl traffic generation would b~ expected as a re~mlt of'high and dry stores* where boats would be placed into and removed from the water before and after each use in addition to that of the existing restaurant and marina faaili&'. The Planning Board may r, qulre a traffic impact analysis to further evaluate traffic generation and flow. Addittonall),; it appears' as if the s;or~d boats will have to b~ transported acros~~ Main Street EAF Is~rt 1 R~vi~v NP&V No. 0~210 in order to accesa the,~brklift loading area. The applicant sholdd provide confirmation that use of a Town owned street for this purpose is permissible. As 153 boats and 77 parking spaces will be provided in the northern portion of the site in conflcnctton with dye eMsrlng resistant use, the Planning Board ma), wish to have the applicant provide a safe~ analysi,~ of movement wffhin the site. 12. The internal site operations are unclear in tertm' of maneuvering within the site, the need.for multiple c~rb cut~ to th~ Town ,ight-of-way, access to the travel lift area, and general circulation and operation. The proposed curb cut*, two on each sid~ of Main Street seem to show that the north and ,outh sides of the site wilt be linked in terms of equipment moYerr~.t acro~ Main Street. Th~ exact nature of the operation should be identified so that tmpacts of this practice ca~ be assessed I3. The applicant should revise the Site Plan to indicate the location of the test hole and associated data so that the elevation of groundwater rna), be more accurate~. ' determi~ed 34. The applicant shouM s. vectflcally Indicate how water will be provtdewt ;a the stgmtflcant increase in site patror~ and whether addltlanal water will be necessary to operate the boat storage yard (boat washing, etc~). Based on the increased number of boats and type of facili~v proposed, it appears that additional water use would be necessary. Similar to water ~e above, while boat storage in and of itself rna? be considered a 'dry' use, the quantity of site patrom' utilizing the site will increase significantly and therefore wouM be expected to require additional sanitary facilities. The applicant should provida documentation that the existing sanitary o?ystem can accommodate the additional flow. Additionally, the applicant should indicate how boats w:ll be pumped out after u4e 16. Compliance with SCDH$ regulations for best management practice in handling toxic and hatardo~ material,~ should be established, applications flied ~dth involved agencies as appropriate, and impacts of boat us~ and maintenance asoessed. Parental impact to surface water resources' with respect t,~ wetlands, atorrnwater handling, and best management practice shouM be exarmned and further documented. The jurisdict~on of NYSDEC and the Town Truste~ shouM be established and applications submitted to agencies which are also involved in this project, Potential impact on wetlands should be determined. 18. A~r part of ibc L]i~P revie~v, and consideration of potential impact on water resources, the ability of local water,rays to sustain the proposed boat rack installation and increase in recreational boating access to the ~ate,'way should be assessed. This may i~ctude depth of water, channel access, waterway utilization, fuel accessibili~, pumpout stattsn accessibility and consistency with Town planning goals in terms of asage of the waterway& The historical character of the site should be considered at tht3'juncture, with documentation of site history, and mltiganOn with respex't to alteration of the site. Acti*~ty associated with boat storage, internal transport, launching, etc. should be considered in terms of noise, dust and odors, particularly from operation of boat ltjq equipment. 0I '~1 In conclusion, the items noted above should be addressed so ~,c impacm may be more appropriately anal~ed and mitigatcd. Based on the level and quantity of negative impacts ~mticipated and the substantial additional information that is needed/bt fi~rther anal.~is, the Board may wish to issue a Positive D~claration for the proposexl prolix't. NI~&¥' would be plea~d to further review any additional information a,ndJor provide a recommend~ Determination ofSignifiza~ce wSth hrther input from the Bo~crd PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND April ll, 2006 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Patricia C Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Proposed Site Plan for Matt-A-Mar Marina by the Bay Located on the e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street Known as 650 First Street, New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Zone: M-II, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: Please find attached the resolution for the SEQRA review extension for the above referenced site plan application which was heard yesterday, April 10, 2006 at the Public Hearing of the Town of Southold Planning Board. Please be aware the Planning Board will make a decision regarding the State Environmental Quality Review Act at the next Public Hearing on Monday, May 8, 2006. Any additional information to be submitted for the Planning Board to review must be received in this office by Monday, April 24, 2006. Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have anyquestions. Senior Planner Cc: File PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 April 11,2006 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Matt-A-Mar Marina by the Bay Located on the e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street Known as 650 First Street, New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Zone: M-II, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, April 10, 2006: WHEREAS, the proposed action involves a site plan that proposes 17 boat racks storing 9 boats per rack for a total of 153-boat capacity, 10 wet boat slips, use of an existing restaurant and storage building on a 3.25-acre parcel in the M-II Zone located on the e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street known as 650 First Street in New Suffolk, SCTM# 1000-117-8-18; and WHEREAS, pursuant to NYSCRR Regulations Part 617 (SEQR), on May 11,2005, the Town of Southold Planning Board informed the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation that the Town of Southold Planning Board requested to establish itself as Lead Agency for the proposed action; and WHEREAS, as of April 10, 2006, the applicant's agent has not submitted any new supplemental information for review and the Planning Board agreed to allow additional time for the submission of supplemental information prior to the Southold Town Planning Board issuing a determination of significance; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 617.13 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act the applicant will be financially responsible for costs of preparing the Environmental Impact Statement; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board has established itself as lead agency pursuant to SEQRA; be it therefore Matt-A-Mar by the Bay Pa.qe Two April 11,2006 RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, leaves the significance determination open pending submission of supplemental information. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, ~odhouse Chairporson cc: NYSDEC File PLANNING BOARD MEMBER~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND ApH1 11, 2006 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hail Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Proposed Site Plan for Matt-A-Mar Marina bythe Bay Located on the e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street Known as 650 First Street, New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Zone: M-II, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: Please find attached the resolution for the SEQRA review extension for the above referenced site plan application which was heard yesterday, April 10, 2006 at the Public Hearing of the Town of Southold Planning Board. Please be aware the Planning Board will make a decision regarding the State Environmental Quality Review Act at the next Public Hearing on Monday, May 8, 2006. Any additional information to be submitted for the Planning Board to review must be received in this office by Monday, April 24, 2006. Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any questions. Senior Planner Cc: File PLANNING BOARD MEMBER~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 March 14, 2006 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Matt-A-Mar Marina by the Bay Located on the e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street known as 650 First Street, in New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Zone: M-II, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, March 13, 2006: WHEREAS, the proposed action involves a site plan that proposes 17 boat racks storing 9 boats per rack for a total of 153-boat capacity, 10 wet boat slips, use of an existing restaurant and storage building on a 3.25-acre parcel in the M-II Zone located on the e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street known as 650 First Street in New Suffolk, SCTM# 1000-117-8-18; and WHEREAS, pursuant to NYSCRR Regulations Part 617 (SEQR), on May 11,2005, the Town of Southold Planning Board informed the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation that the Town of Southold Planning Board requested to establish itself as Lead Agency for the proposed action; and WHEREAS, as of March 13, 2006, the applicant's agent has not submitted any new supplemental information for review and the Planning Board agreed to allow additional time for the submission of supplemental information prior to the Southold Town Planning Board issuing a determination of significance; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 617.13 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act the applicant will be financially responsible for costs of preparing the Environmental Impact Statement; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board has established itself as lead agency pursuant to SEQRA; be it therefore Matt-A-Mar by the Bay Paqe Two March 14, 2006 RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, leaves the significance determination open pending submission of supplemental information. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Chairperson cc: NYSDEC PLANNING BOARD MEMBERe JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 February 14, 2006 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Matt-A-Mar Marina by the Bay Located on the e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street known as 650 First Street, in New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Zone: M-II, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, February 13, 2006: WHEREAS, the proposed action involves a site plan that proposes 17 boat racks storing 9 boats per rack for a total of 153-boat capacity, 10 wet boat slips, use of an existing restaurant and storage building on a 3.25-acre parcel in the Mil Zone located on the e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street known as 650 First Street in New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18; and WHEREAS, pursuant to NYSCRR Regulations Part 617 (SEQR), on May 11,2005, the Town of Southold Planning Board informed the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation that the Town of Southold Planning Board requested to establish itself as Lead Agency for the proposed action; and WHEREAS, as of February 10, 2006, the applicant's agent has not submitted any new supplemental information for review and the Planning Board agreed to allow additional time for the submission of supplemental information prior to the Southold Town Planning Board issuing a determination of significance; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 617.13 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act the applicant will be financially responsible for costs of preparing the Environmental Impact Statement; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board has established itself as lead agency pursuant to SEQRA; be it therefore Matt-A-Mar by the Bay Pa.qe Two February 14,2006 RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, leaves the significance determination open pending submission of supplemental information. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, ~erilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson cc: NYSDEC PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hail Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, N-Y Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 January 10, 2006 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Matt-A-Mar Marina by the Bay Located on the e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street known as 650 First Street, in New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Zone: M-II, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, January 9, 2006: WHEREAS, the proposed action involves a site plan that proposes 17 boat racks storing 9 boats per rack for a total of 153-boat capacity, 10 wet boat slips, use of an existing restaurant and storage building on a 3.25-acre parcel in the Mil Zone located on the e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street known as 650 First Street in New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18; and WHEREAS, pursuant to NYSCRR Regulations Part 617 (SEQR), on May 11,2005, the Town of Southold Planning Board informed the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation that the Town of Southold Planning Board requested to establish itself as Lead Agency for the proposed action; and WHEREAS, as of January 09, 2006, the applicant's agent has not submitted any new supplemental information for review and the Planning Board agreed to allow additional time for the submission of supplemental information prior to the Southold Town Planning Board issuing a determination of significance; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 617.13 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act the applicant will be financially responsible for costs of preparing the Environmental Impact Statement; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board has established itself as lead agency pursuant to SEQRA; be it therefore Matt-A-Mar by the Bay Page Two January 10, 2006 RESQLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, leaves the significance determination open pending submission of supplemental information. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, house4~"''"~~ Chairperson cc: NYSDFC ~oore L~$ 63! ?65 p.1 P5 PATRICIA C. ?,IOORE 51(i20 Main l<oau Southold. N Y. i952 Tel: t631 ) 7o5- t330 t:ax: {631 ) 705 4643 Jzmuary 0, 2006 Soud~old Town Phmning Town Hail 53095 Main Road F',O.Box I t79 Soudmld, Nh' t 1971 Att: Bnmo MatbA-Ma'Marma by he B:ty SCTM#1Ot)0- i 17 08 ', S We ,,~ tmld ,espcclftHI v ;'cot[cst fl~:~l y~ ~ ~ I . ~ * the SEQRA determination open \Ve have i'et:fincd Cramcr Cons'.fltin.S te r.x ew thc LoaS Env~ronmenlal Assessment Form Very truly yours, Patr'~c:,a C~ Moorc cc: MatbA-Mar Mm'ir, a LLC PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 December 13, 2005 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re; Proposed Site Plan for Matt-A-Mar Marina by the Bay Located on the e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street known as 650 First Street, in New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Zone: M-II, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, December 12, 2005: WHEREAS, the proposed action involves a site plan that proposes 17 boat racks storing 9 boats per rack for a total of 153-boat capacity, 10 wet boat slips, use of an existing restaurant and storage building on a 3.25-acre parcel in the Mil Zone located on the e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street known as 650 First Street in New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18; and WHEREAS, pursuant to NYSCRR Regulations Part 617 (SEQR), on May 11, 2005, the Town of Southold Planning Board informed the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation that the Town of Southold Planning Board requested to establish itself as Lead Agency for the proposed action; and WHEREAS, as of December 12, 2005, the applicant's agent has not submitted any new supplemental information for review and the Planning Board agreed to allow additional time for the submission of supplemental information prior to the Southold Town Planning Board issuing a determination of significance; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 617.13 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act the applicant will be financially responsible for costs of preparing the Environmental Impact Statement; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board has established itself as lead agency pursuant to SEQRA; be it therefore Matt-A-Mar by the Bay Paqe Two December 13, 2005 RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, leaves the significance determination open pending submission of supplemental information. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, ~erilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson cc:NYSDEC PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 November 8, 2005 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Matt-A-Mar Marina by the Bay Located on the e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street also known as 650 First Street located in New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Zone: M-II, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, November 7, 2005: WHEREAS, the proposed action involves a site plan that proposes 17 boat racks storing 9 boats per rack for a total of 153-boat capacity, 10 wet boat slips, use of an existing restaurant and storage building on a 3.25-acre parcel in the Mil Zone located on the e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street known as 650 First Street in New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18; and WHEREAS, pursuant to NYSCRR Regulations Part 617 (SEQR), on May 11,2005, the Town of Southold Planning Board informed the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation that the Town of Southold Planning Board requested to establish itself as Lead Agency for the proposed action; and WHEREAS, on November 7, 2005, the applicant's agent has not submitted any new supplemental information for review and the Planning Board agreed to allow additional time for the submission of supplemental information prior to the Southold Town Planning Board issuing a determination of significance; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 617.13 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act the applicant will be financially responsible for costs of preparing the Environmental Impact Statement; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board has established itself as lead agency pursuant to SEQRA; be it therefore Matt-A-Mar by the Bay Pa,qe Two November 8, 2005 RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, leaves the significance determination open pending submission of supplemental information. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, ~'Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson cc: NYSDEC PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 October 27, 2005 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Att: Bruno Re~ Matt-A-Mar Marina by the Bay SCTM# 1000-117-08-18 Dear Bruno: Please be advised that the final survey has not been completed. We had agreed to submit a new survey. The survey is required for the Building Department review of the permits. It is premature to make a SEQRA determination of environmental impact. We would respectfully request that you continue to leave the SEQRA determination open until the building department file is complete and Mr. Verity has made a determination on the use. We have retained Cramer Consulting to review the Long Environmental Assessment Form for completeness. Ve.~urs, ~tfi~ifl C. Moore cc: Matt-A-Mar Manna LLC ¢,3 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J, CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 October 18, 2005 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Rez Proposed Site Plan for Matt-A-Mar Marina by the Bay Located on the e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street also known as 650 First Street located in New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Zone: M-II, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, October 17, 2005: WHEREAS, the proposed action involves a site plan that proposes 17 boat racks storing 9 boats per rack for a total of 153-boat capacity, 10 wet boat slips, use of an existing restaurant and storage building on a 3.25-acre parcel in the Mil Zone located on the e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street known as 650 First Street in New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18; and WHEREAS, pursuant to NYSCRR Regulations Part 617 (SEQR), on May 11,2005, the Town of Southold Planning Board informed the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation that the Town of Southold Planning Board requested to establish itself as Lead Agency for the proposed action; and WHEREAS, on October 17, 2005, the applicant's agent has not submitted any new supplemental information for review and the Planning Board agreed to allow additional time for the submission of supplemental information prior to the Southold Town Planning Board issuing a determination of significance; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 617.13 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act the applicant will be financially responsible for costs of preparing the Environmental Impact Statement; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board has established itself as lead agency pursuant to SEQRA; be it therefore Matt-A-Mar by the Bay - Paqe Two - October 18, 2005 RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, leaves the significance determination open pending submission of supplemental information. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, William Cremers Vice Chairman cc: NYSDEC PLANNING BOARD MEMBI~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 September 13, 2005 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Matt-A-Mar Marina by the Bay Located on the e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street also known as 650 First Street located in New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Zone: M-II, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, September 12, 2005: WHEREAS, the proposed action involves a site plan that proposes 17 boat racks storing 9 boats per rack for a total of 153-boat capacity, 10 wet boat slips, use of an existing restaurant and storage building on a 3.25-acre parcel in the Mil Zone located on the e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street known as 650 First Street in New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18; and WHEREAS, pursuant to NYSCRR Regulations Part 617 (SEQR), on May 11,2005, the Town of Southold Planning Board informed the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation that the Town of Southold Planning Board requested to establish itself as Lead Agency for the proposed action; and WHEREAS, on September 9, 2005, the applicant's agent has not submitted any new supplemental information for review and the Planning Board agreed to allow additional time for the submission of supplemental information prior to the Southold Town Planning Board issuing a determination of significance; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 617.13 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act the applicant will be financially responsible for costs of preparing the Environmental Impact Statement; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board has established itself as lead agency pursuant to SEQRA; be it therefore Matt-A-Mar by the Bay - Paqe Two - September 13, 2005 RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under, the State Environmental Quality Review Act, leaves the significance determination open pending submission of supplemental information. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Chairperson cc: NYSDEC Date TOWN OF SOUTHOLD '-~4375 Tax Exempt # A163554 Account # ~[~t:~.~~ er and send billing to: rtment Address P~. CLr~ ~, ~. VENDOR **Return this copy and Town of Southold voucher itemized and signed for payment** ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL DRDER IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURES OF THE DEPT. HEAD AND THE SUPERVISOR ~LE ~'ION CHARGED JST ~HASE ORDER PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ JERILYN B. WO©DHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 August9,2005 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Matt-A-Mar Marina by the Bay Located on the e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street also known as 650 First Street located in New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Zone: M-II, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, August 8, 2005: WHEREAS, the proposed action involves a site plan that proposes 17 boat racks storing 9 boats per rack for a total of 153 boat capacity, 10 wet boat slips, use of an existing restaurant and storage building on a 3.25 acre parcel in the Mil Zone located at e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street also known as 650 First Street located in New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18; and WHEREAS, pursuant to NYSCRR Regulations Part 617 (SEQR), on May 11,2005, the Town of Southold Planning Board informed the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation that the Town of Southold Planning Board requested to establish itself as Lead Agency for the proposed action; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board retained Nelson, Pope and Voorhis, LLC to review the Long Environmental Assessment Form for further completeness and potential adverse impacts as a result of the proposed action; and WHEREAS, on May 25, 2005, the Town of Southold Planning Board determined that Part 1 of the Environmental Assessment Form was incomplete and informed the agent applicant; and Matt-A-Mar by the Bay - Page Two - 8/9/05 WHEREAS, on July 5, 2005, Nelson Pope and Voorhis, LLC submitted the report titled: "Environmental Assessment Review Environmental and Planninq Considerations Matt-A- Mar Marina LLC ~ New Suffolk" and recommended a request for additional information to determine significance; and WHEREAS, on August 5, 2005, the applicant's agent indicated an updated survey is being prepared which may mitigate some comments on the report and the Planning Board agrees to allow additional time for the submission of supplemental information prior to the Southold Town Planning Board issuing a determination of significance; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 617.13 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act the applicant will be financially responsible for costs of preparing the Environmental Impact Statement; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board has established itself as lead agency pursuant to SEQRA; be it therefore RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, leaves the significance determination open pending submission of supplemental information. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Chairperson cc: NYSDEC Moore L~ OFFice PATRICIA C. MOORE ~20 Mnh'~ Road New 'Yo!'k I 1971 fei: (63 I ;' 765-4330 p.1 i! zt',..,.,SP~s :' 2~ .... ............. , PLEASE CALL BACK ~q.. S.i)ON AS POSS iSLE. -' - 'm ' gL ~u~ 05 o5 La~ O~fice 631 ?85 PA'[RICIA C. MOORE ~.ttorney at Law 020 Main Road Nc~-%r'fOrk 1 9~1-4616 imx: (b31)765-46~ i; August 5, 2(}05 BY FACSIMII ,E Jeri Woodhouse, Chairwoman and Southoid Town Planning Board Southotd l'ox~n Halt Annex Main Road Southold, NY 1 t971 RE: Matt-.&-Mar by the [las. SCTM # 1000- 122-6-29.3 Dear Chairwmnan Woodhotlse and Members of the Board: We at-e in receipt of the Nelson. Pope, Voorhis report. It is being reviewed. Please not'~ tha~ we are haxit2g an updated survey prepared which may address and mitigate many o~' the commenL'; on the report, therefore, please leave the SEQRA determination ol'significancc open per:di~g thc submission o£additional infc}rmation fi'om my ofllce. Thank you. V~ry truly yours, "- Patricia C. Moore PCM'mr Robert G. Kassner Legal Assistant PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 1 I971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowsk/ Legal Secretary July 25, 2005 Thomas Cramer Cramer Consulting P.O.Box 5535 Miller Place, NY 11764 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Matt-A-Mar by the Bay First Street, New Suffolk SCTM# 1000-117-08-18 Dear Mr. Cramer, Enclosed is a copy of the Environmental Assessment Review of the above project prepared by Nelson, Pope & Voorhis. Please provide us with a proposal for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that will address the concerns mentioned in the Voorhis Environmental Assessment Review. If you require additional information, please contact this office. CC: Very truly yours, Patricia C. Moore Michael Raynor Chic Voorhis, Nelson, Pope @ Voorhis / Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 July 22, 2005 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Mat-A-Mar by the Bay First Street, New Suffolk SCTM# 1000-117-08-18 Dear Mrs. Moore, This is to inform you that the Planning Board accepted the enclosed report from Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC. at the July 18, 2005 Work Session. Please review the report and respond in writing to the Planning Department. Your application will be placed on hold until we are in receipt of the required information, as requested by the report. If there are any questions, you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC: file Enclosure: Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC. report FAX COVER SHEET Phone: D~' Re: No. of Pa~es: Comm~ll~: Bruno Semon Mark Terry (631) 765-3136 Chic Voodais July 6, 2005 Ma,-a-Mar, New Suffolk Attached plea.se find Rte review for Mnt-a. Mar, New Suffolk. Ple~ review and give me a ca3.. TO'd L~T Sa~ 9T~ ~]]'3~Od'NOS]BN TE:80 S00E-90-sn£ Robert G. Kassner Legal Assistant PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Legal Secretary June 1, 2005 Mark Terry, Senior Enviornmental Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Matt-A-Mar By the Bay Planner First and Main Street, New Suffolk SCTM# 1000-117-08-08 Dear Mark, Enclosed, completed LWRP form. If you have any questions, as requested in your letter of May 25, 2005, please contact this office. is the Encl. Cc: Michael Raynor Very truly yours, Patricia C. Moore Town oi~ Southold A. INSTRUCTIONS LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, sl~ti' complete this ~AF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Cons(s~ency Review 'Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a- Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM / / o /t z r- - 4.£ ? 7//£ The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board ~ Planning Dept. [] Building Dept. ~ Board of Trustees [] Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and ex~nt of_fiction: Location of action: Site acreage: (,~,'%~ /'/£~.- Present l~d Present zon~g classification: If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name (b) Mailing address: (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( ) ~' ~] -- ~ 7 ~ -- A.~ 7'3 ? (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency.'? Yes ~-] No~ If yes, which state or federal agency? DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. [~Yes ~ No ~ Not Applicable Aaach additional sheets if ~ecess~ Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria Yes pplie .e Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Yes [--] No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ~ Yes ~-~ No ~ Not Applicable Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP i:> £ m Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria .[~ Yes [] No ~]Not Ap licable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes ~ No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. See Section III - Policies Pages; 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section Ill - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. .~ Yes ~ No ~ Not Applicable ~ odmfnl) T~bF Wo q~ ~ ~b~E ~ DE'~F T'~)'oO,T pFF~ PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Yes ~ No [-~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ~-~ Yes ~ No [] Not Applicable A~ach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section lll- Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ~ Yes ~ No ~-~ Not Applicable At~ach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Sonthold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ~ Yes ~ No~] Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ~ Yes ~-~ No ~ Not Applicable PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southald, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 May 25, 2005 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re~ Lead Agency Coordination Request for Matt - A -Mar by the Bay Site Plan SCTM# 1000-117-8-8 Dear Ms. Moore: Please be advised that the Southold Town Planning Board is the Lead Agency for the above action. The Planning Board has reviewed the Part 1 Long Environmental Form (EAF) submitted with no date and has determined that the form is incomplete and incorrect. Please revise the following 1. Page 2 of 21, Description of Action 2. Section A. Items 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 14 and 20. 3. Section B. Items 12, 13, 16, 17, 6 (re-assess) and 12. The action is subject to Chapter 95 Waterfront Coastal Consistency Review and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan (2005) of the Town of Southold Town Code. Pursuant to Chapter 95 please complete and submit the enclosed LWRP Consistency Assessment Form for the action and submit it together with the amended EAF. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 765-1936, or Kieran Corcoran the Assistant Town Attorney at 765-1939. Sincerely ~ JSenior,.,~fironmental Planner Cc: Southold Town Board Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Trustees Patricia Finnegan, Town Attorney Kieran Corcoran, Assistant Town Attorney Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Mike Verity, Chief Building Inspector Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D~ SOLOMON May 20, 2005 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OV~ICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Mat-A-Mar By the Bay First Street, New Suffolk SCTM# 1000-117-8-8 Dear Mrs. Moore, Enclosed you will find a copy of the estimate from NPV for the consultant fee. Please review the enclosed information and if you are in agreement with the estimate then submit a check for the amount of $850.00 made payable to the Town of Southold. This site plan application will not proceed further until we receive the payment. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 x229 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file enc. Robert Kassner Legal Assistant PATRICIA C. MOORE Atiorney at Law 5 ! 020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Legal Secretary May 18, 2005 Ms. Jeri Woodhouse Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 (BY HAND) Re: Checks for Enviommental fees for Matt-A mar By The Bay and By The Sound SCTM # 1000-117-8-18 & SCTM # 1000-114-03-01 Dear Ms. Woodhouse, Enclosed are checks # 4239 & 4232, each in the amount of $850.00 for the enviommental review of the above projects. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Encl's Very truly yours, Patricia C. Moore DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COUNTY OF SUFF( STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE May 13, 2005 THOMAS ISLES, AICP DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Town of Southold Planning Bd. P.O. box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Bruno Semon, Sr. Site Plan Reviewer Pursuant to Section 239L & M of the General Municipal Law, the following site plan/special exception which have been submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is/are considered to be a matter for local determination as them appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact(s). A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or a disapproval. Site Plan/Special Permit Local File No.(s) Mat-A-Mar By the Bay 1000-117-8-18 NOTE: Does not constitute acceptance of any zoning action(s) associated therewith before any other local regulatory board. Very truly yours, Thomas Isles, AICP Director of Planning ~"Andrew P. Freleng, AICP Principal Planner APF:cc G:\CCHORNY~ZONING~ONING\WORKING\LD2005~APR\BR029 APR LOCATION H. LEE DENNISON BLDG. - 4TH FLOOR 100 VEIERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY MAILING ADDRESS P. O. BOX 6100 HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788-0099 (631) 853-5190 IELECOPIER (631) 853-4044 NI=LE~ON, PDpI:: ,~ VDORHI-m, LLC Memorandum To: Bnmo S~non From: Chic Voorhis Date: May 10, 2005 Re: Prellmi~ary Environmental SEQRA Review Cost Mat-A-Mav~m'in~ Nmv Suffolk DesrBruno: ~ m As discoas~d, the fee for Preliminary Environmental Review is $850.00 This will cover the follov~ug scope of services: Iuspection of subject property and site ~ic~uity. Research of office references and literature related to environmental/planning site conditions and use. Review of Part I EAF; prepare Part H EAF on magnitudo of impacts. Keview letter documenting findings of tasks 1-3, action classification, comparison to SEQRA criteria for determining sign~ficauce, potential impacts and magnitude, and recommendations supportin~ a deter,',,insiion of significance or for further information necessary to support a determination. Fee: $850.00 Review supplemental information submitted by the applicant in support of the application. Prepared recommended determination of significance (if requested by Board). Fee: Time Rates Thank you for contacting NP&V for se~wices in connection with SEQR review of the above referenced project. Please feel free to call should you have any questions. Respectfully submitted, PLANNING BOARD MEMBER~ JEPALYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southald, NY 11971 OI~P'ICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 May 11,2005 Ms. Naomi Handell, Environmental Analyst Division of Environmental Permits New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40 - SUNY Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request for Matt - A - Mar by the Bay DEC Project Number 1-4738-01008/0008 The Planning Board is in receipt of the Lead Agency Coordination Request dated April 20, 2005. The proposed site plan application for SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 before the NYSDEC is within the jurisdiction of the Southold Town Planning Board. Accordingly, the Southold Town Planning Board has also received a site plan application for the action and pursuant to 6NYCCR Part 617 is requesting to take and act as the lead agency for the proposed action. Please forward any issues of concern from your agency or any other that you may have received to date. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 765-1938, or Kieran Corcoran the Assistant Town Attorney at 765-1939. Sincerely ~ental Planner Cc: Southold Town Board Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Trustees Patricia Finnegan, Town Attorney Kieran Corcoran, Assistant Town Attorney Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Mike Verity, Chief Building Inspector PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTttOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 O~'ICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 May 11, 2005 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re~ Proposed Site Plan for Mat-A-Mar By the Bay First Street, New Suffolk SCTM# 1000-117-8-8 Dear Mrs. Moore, This is to inform you, the Planning Board (PB) held a Work Session on May 9, 2005 and determined that this site plan application will be placed on hold until we are in receipt of the following information: As requested at the joint meeting on May 5, 2005, by the Building Department for clarification. Please submit all uses on the lot and the total lot area described in acres. Additionally, please provide the written documentation you spoke about on the restat~rant use. Submit a plan and or detail of the proposed Boat Rack Mr. Michael Raynor described at the ~neeting, as you are aware the file contains a different plan/detail. Please submit this information to the Planning Department along with the information requested in the April 26, 2005 letter. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. ,/Brt~Sdon Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file,bd,pd COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CHARLES J. BARTHA, P.E. May 5, 2005 Town of Southold Planning Board Office P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N. Y. 11971-0957 Attn: Bruno Semon Re: Mat-A-Mar by the Bay 650 First Street New Suffolk, NY SCTM#1000-117-8-18 To Whom It May Concern: Since this proposed development is not adjacent to a County maintained road or a road proposed for improvements by the County, a permit will not be required from this Department. If you have any questions, kindly contact this office at 852-4100. Very truly yours, William Hillman, P.E. Chief Engineer WH:BD:In By: '~'~<~ c-~_ Bianca Dresch, P.E. Civil Engineer SUFFOLK COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER New York State Department of En.vironmental Conservation Division of Environmental permits, Recnon One Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook. New York 11790-2356 Phone: (631) 444-0365 FAX: (631) 444-0360 April 20, 2005 Town of Southold Re: LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST Dear Sirs: i APR 27 The. pu~rpoge of this r.e~uest is to determine under the State Envi ~..,=,,tal ~a~a{1,~u~.~,mw Act :EQRA) ot me rmwronmental Uonservation Law and 6NYCRR Part 617 the following: · Your agency s Junsdmnon ~n the action described below; 2. Your agency's interest in actingas lead agency; 3. Issues of concern your agencybelieves sliouldbe evaluated. Enclosed is a copy of our permit application and a completed Part 1 of the Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in responding· Project Name: Matt-A-Mar bvtheBayLLC i1~- ({' [Q~ Location: 650 First Street DEC Application #: 1-4738-01008/00008 Permit Type: Tidal Wetlands SEQRA Classification: [ ] Type I [ X ] Unlisted DEC Position: [ ] DEC wishes to assume lead agency status. [ X ] DEC has no objection to your agency or another agency assuming lead agency status for this action, but reserves the right to comment on this action if a positive determination of significance is made. Please respond to my attention within 30 days of the date of this letter. If no response is received within 30 days, we will assume that you have no objection to DEC or another agency assuming the role of lead agency, and have n° comments to offer regarding the proposed action at tNs time. Please feel free to contact this office at (631) 444-0365 for further information or discussion. Sincerely, Naomi Handell Environmental Analyst ' cc: (see distribution list) File 617.20 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR /2. PROJECT NAME 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality ,~'/.~' ~//~:~F~)J_.~ County ~_~z.//~F(~_./~''~ 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intemections, prominent isndmar~s, etc., or provide map) 5. PROPOSED ACTION IS: ~ New [] Expansion [] Modification/alteration ETa 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initialty ,'~, ~ acres Ultimately ,.~ · ,.~' acres WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? ,~Yes [] No If No, describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICIN TY OF PROJECT? J~ Residential [] Industrial J~[ Commercial [] Agriculture [] Park/ForestJOpen Space [] Other 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? .~Yes [] No If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit/approvals: 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [] Yes [] No ff Yes, list agency(s) name and permitJapprovals: 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MOD F CATION? []Yes [~No I CER I IPY THAT.~HE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsorname: /~)/~/'/~'/~/~ -//~ ~"~' ,/~<:~O /~ t~ Date: Signature: If the ~~S; ena:[~:~mmeP~te the OVER 1 ~FOR PERMIT United S~tes ~y Co~s of Engineem 401 Wa~ euali~ ~fi~tion ~r~enUCon~ Pe~. ~ ~ner ~N/C~a~ .~n I re~p~. Num~r (da~) I MEMO April 25, 2005 To: Planning Board Re: Matt-a-Mar by the Bay SCTM # 117-8-18 This is a partial list of Trustee concerns regarding the Matt-a-Mar application for boat racks: 1. Location of the racks seems to be dangerous as far as the movement across the street with the movement of boats for launching. Location may be better in the southern part of the marina. 2. Height: what will that height look like; how does it compare for the rest of New Suffolk, and how does it affect view vistas. 3. Sanitary facilities: new ones or using the existing at the restaurant? These have had problems for years. 4. Pump out facilities for boats. 5. Hours of operation (boat launch will be loud). 6. Traffic for the boat rack use, and travel lift traveling on the roads. 7. Impact on the bay of that number of boats. 8. Contamination of existing land from previous uses. 9. Impact on the fueling facilities at New Suffolk Shipyard and Schoolhouse Creek. 10. Conformance with the Hamlet study. 11. Waste generation on site; 12. Scale of operation 13. Number of slips. 14. Buffer areas. 15. Water quality impacts. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON Date: April 27, 2005 MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 O~'~ICE LOCATION: Town Hail Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board Josh Horton, Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook U.S. Army Corp of Engineers New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Department of Public Works From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer(~.~ Re: Agency Referral requests required under Southold Town Code Article XXV 100-254 Review Procedure part C the Planning Board refers this site plan for concerns, comments and Jurisdiction requirements if applicable. Dear Reviewer: Attached is a copy of the application received. The site plan status is a New Active Site Plan. Below is site plan application information pertaining to the listed project: Mat-A-Mar by the Bay 650 First Street New Suffolk, NY SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 This new site plan is for 17 boat racks with 153 boat capacity of 7,572 sq.ft, with 9 boats each rack includes maintenance of a exiting restaurant and storage building on 3.25 acres parcel in the Mil Zone at 650 First Street located on the e/s/o First Street approximately 32' s/o King Street in New Suffolk. SCTM#(s) 1000-117.-8-18 Please respond on your agency's position of the above action. Thank you in advance. cc: File attachment PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 April 27, 2005 Suffolk County Planning Commission Mr. Gerald Newman H/Lee Dennison Building, PO Box 6100 Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099 Re: Site Plan for Mat-A-Mar by the Bay 650 First Street New Suffolk, NY SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Zoning District: Marine II Dear Mr. Newman, Attached you will find a site plan, application, eaf, aerial & structural plan to the above listed property. The Planning Board refers this to you for Suffolk County Planning Approval. Please send us concerns, comments and or approval of the proposed build out. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 x 5019 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respec/~/~7ours, Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file Enc, site plan, app, eaf Semon, Bruno To: Cc: Subject: PB Mem all staff Tetrault, Heather; Standish, Lauren Mat-A-Mar by the Bay- New Suffolk "5/11/05 Joint site visit" As a reminder the Trustees will complete a field visit on May 11, 2005. I do not have a time yet and will inform you when I find out. Included in this email you will find Lauren and Heathers email address of the Trustees. Please contact them for details. Thanks Bruno PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 April 27, 2005 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re~ Proposed Site Plan for Mat-A-Mar By the Bay First Street, New Suffolk SCTM# 1000-117-8-8 Dear Mrs. Moore, Attached you will find a copy of the easement information. Revise the site plan to include this easement as required. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. ours, · t~rmm aemon Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file Attachment PLANNING BOARD MEMB JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 April 26, 2005 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re~ Proposed Site Plan for Mat-A-Mar By the Bay First Street, New Suffolk SCTM# 1000-117-8-8 Dear Mrs. Moore, This is to inform you of additional site plan requirements needed at this time. For your information, your letter received on dated March 29, 2005 and the certified structural plan were reviewed at the Joint Building Department / Planning Department meeting on April 25, 2005. This letter will also confirm that you and your client are scheduled for a meeting on May 5, 2005 at 10:00am in the Planning Department. As discussed on the telephone on April 18, 2005, please be prepared to explain the parking calculations as shown on the site plan. In addition, please have the site plan revised to meet the minimum Town Code requirements (see the check list included). The Building Department requires a&[gfi.fic~ion on the existing p..lL?a~ional us~e_9,of all buildings and an indication of the business office location if applicable. Please indicate the current plan and future plans for the restaurant. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Re~p)etfu/~urs, Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file SITE PLAN CHECKLIST MINIMUM SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS {} Notice of Disapproval from Building Department required under 100-253 of the Town Code. Lot, block section from Suffolk County Tax Map. Name and address of landowner on record. Names and addresses of adjoining landowners. Names and address of applicant (if not same as landowner). Name and address of person preparing map (plan) sealed with license seal and signature. Date of Plan. North Point. Location of all rights-of-way within 500 feet of property lines. Key map showing location and owners of all adjoining lands within 500 feet at a scale of 1 inch equals 100 feet. Existing zone district, adjoining property zone districts and zoning district lines if the property includes a split zone. Buildings and build out with percent lot coverage ( see bulk schedule of zone). Landscaping and percent landscaped ( see bulk schedule of zone). Scale, 1 inch equals 20 feet. Existing building structures / utilities and proposed structures/utilities. Show all uses of the site in a town defined type, detail square feet and park n~ calculations broken down by the use, refer to Town Code section 100-190//~,/~, Include handicap parking spaces as required in New York State Code. (,~..~' Drainage plan detailing paved areas including sidewalks and parking areas w~th calculations. Show outdoor lighting with detail of wattage and type of fixture refer to 100-239.5. Show location of ground transformers, fire well and fire hydrants. Show location of dumpster. Existing trees of 6 inches in diameter at a point 3 feet above the truck base property boundaries. Landscape plan detailing location of landscaping, type of material plants, buffering, street trees -see attached Town Code information 100-212 & 100-213. Data for architectural review (see information below) & refer to 100-257 & 100-258 Building elevations for all facades and floor plans showing proposed use of floor area ADDITIONAL'REQUIREMENTS {If Applicable) {} {} {} Off street loading areas as required, refer to Town Code 100-192 for Loading Berth Requirements. Existing contours with intervals of 2 feet or less Show wetlands Outdoor signs - sketch to scale and colors refer to 100-200/209 Proposed grading, including existing and proposed topography with 2 feet contours on site and 200 feet beyond the property line Spot elevations for buildings 2 NOTE: YOU ARE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN THE FOLLOWING APPROVALS: OTHER AGENCY APPROVALS (If Applicable) Review required by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Review by New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) for curb cut permit ( For Route 25) Review by Suffolk County Department of Public Works (SCDPW) for curb cut permit ( For County Road 48) {v}'~ Review by New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) (~"'- New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Storm water runoff permit (SPDES) for ground disturbance of 1 acre or greater. Review by Southold Town Trustees for dredging, bulkhead, wetlands, coastal hazard area Review required by Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Review required by Southold Town Board U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Bulkhead, dredging. Greenport Village Utility: Water if within village franchise area. Other 2 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 April 25, 2005 Matthew Martin, Secretary Cutchogue Fire District P.O. Box 930 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Dear Mr. Martin: RE: SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Matt-a-Mar By the Bay LLC Enclosed are the following items: 1. site plan revised November 30, 2004 2. property map 3. elevation map 4. copies of March correspondence from Attorney Patricia Moore These items are being referred to you for fire access review and for your recommendations. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours;~ Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer encs. PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 April 22, 2005 Mr. Bruno Semon Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Matt-A-Mar by the Bay Dear Bruno: With regard to the above referenced project, please be advised that we respectfully request this matter not be put on the Planning Board work session agenda on Monday, April 25, 2005 as I will be out of town. In addition, at the Board of Trustees meeting of April 20, it was recommended that the Planning Board and the Board of Trustees have a joint meeting which we agree would be beneficial to all parties. We respectfully request that a joint meeting be coordinated with the Trustees and the Planning Board at the earliest possible date. Thank you for your courtesies. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. ~~uly yours, PCM/mr ?,r ~, 2005 P-%T~-~[CL4. C. NIOOR.I 755 423 CI confidential inf0rmatk.:m ~ cn Pa~.rlcia C. Moore. TBJs ~s in~.endad solely {er use by ~he individ~:=l enti~:, ,lamed as the ',,- c ~N~_,~I,DI;IG COVER TOTAL Ng. IIqBER OF P~u,~E~., · -" *- ' ' IF TRA~'ISMISStCN IS K%ULTY OR AS POSSIBLE CLIENT NAME: OPERATOR. iNCOMPLIETE, Pt,EASE CAi,I, BACK AS SOON APR 2 2 2005 PATR[C~A C. MOORE 103! Mare q~u!hc~id, ' ~ew Y,~'k 1197! Tel: ,t(,M 1705-4330 Fa~: (t3 i ~ 765-4643 Mr. Bruno Son~n Southold Tcwn Planning Bear Southold Tow~ Hall PO Box 1279 Southold, KY 119'71 Re: Matt-A-Nar oy the Bay With regard~-' the abcv) r)ferenced project, [please be advlsed that we respectfully ,-e¢.. L,'e~ ~ this mat~er no~ ~'~. ~ut on the Y!annin~ Board work session agenda ~n ~onday, Ap~ 25, 2005 as I will be out of In addltion, at the Bo~.rd of Trustees meezing of April 20, i5 was recommended that the P3 ~nn:~ng Board and the Board o~ T:ustees have a joint meeting wkic~ we agree wauld be beneficial to all parties. We respectfully reque%t that a jo~n:: meeting be coordinated with the Trusneea and the ~lanning Beard at the earliest possible date. Thank you for your co]r~:esies. If you nave any guestions, please do nee hesitate ~o contact me. '--.__ Patricia C. Moore PCX/mr PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971-4616 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 April 21, 2005 Ms. Jeri Woodhouse, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box1179 Southold, NY 11971 APR 2 2 2005 Re: Matt-A-Mar By the Bay, LLC First and Main Street, New Suffolk SCTM# 1000-117-18 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: The following is a chronology of the of the above referenced site plan application: 1. 12-17-2004, Filed Building Department permit application for notice of disapproval 2. 12-21-2004, Received Notice of Disapproval from Building Department 3. 12-21-2004, Site Plan application submitted to Planning Board In addition to the above site plan application, I responded to questions raised at a work session and I had requested a copy of the Town drainage easement between New Suffolk Fishing Station and my client's property. To date we have not received any written response to our filing on December 21,2004 or our letter of March 29, 2005, (copy enclosed). Town Code Article XXV, Site Plan Approval, 100-254-B. (1) states, "Within ten (10) business days of the receipt of the application, the Planning Board shall determine weather to accept, reject or request revision of the application. (2) If the Planning Board determines said application to be acceptable but in need of revision, it shall notify the applicant, in writting, wherein said application is deficient within thirty (30) business days." This project conforms both to zoning and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. If you require additional information or have any questions, please contact my office, I will give any inquiry my imeadiate attention. Respectfully, Patricia C. Moore Encl. cc: Michael Raynor PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 March 29, 2005 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Att: Bruno (BY HAND) Dear Bruno: Re: Matt-A-Mar By the Bay, LLC SCTM#1000-117-08-18 In accordance with your request, enclosed are two prints of the construction drawings for the boat racks. These drawings were submitted with our December 21, 2004 application (item %7). These are structural drawings and elevations. The racks will be placed on footinqs which are also engineered, however, soil compaction tests are required for the engineer to prepare construction drawings of the footings. The engineering of the footings will be done by a NYS licensed design professional upon approval of site plan and prior to submission of building permit. In response to some issues raised at the Planning Board work session: Number of Required parking spaces - The dry boat racks have 153 spaces for max. of 153 boats (shown) In the Marina: A. along north and east side of the basin 10 wet slips for in- water boat storage (Marina use from 4/1 through 10/31}- parking reserved (shown) B. Along the west side of the basin 10 boat slips reserved for the Restaurant 16 parking spaces are allocated to the restaurant with an additional 10 boat slips. (Parking not required for use of slips allocated to restaurant patrons) C. Historically the parking has been shared since there is rarely 100% occupancy of all the uses. This is why land bank parking is recommended. The site plan will be revised to show landscaping within the 10 feet adjacent to First Street and Main Street. Our design professionals recommend "Arborvitae 4' to 5' height, 6' on center". If this is not acceptable please advise. The Beard has considered, in the alternative, to provide off street parking for New Suffolk Businesses. This alternative would need to be discussed in more detail with the client. For your information, the DEC has recommended to my client, as well as other Marinas, this dry storage because of the environmental benefits. I understand you are waiting for comments from other agencies, however, it would be helpful to get started with the Town's comments to the extent they are not addressed herein. The Planning Board work session was rushed and I would request their comments in writing to avoid misunderstanding. Also there is an alleged Town drainage easement along the east property line (between New Suffolk Fishing Station and my client's property), please provide me with a copy of this easement so that I can place it on the site plan. We make ourselves available to the Board to review the site plan, however, Mr. Raynor asks that we discuss this site plan in his presence because some of the Board's questions could be addressed immediately. Please provide me with advance notice (telephone call) when this site plan is presented to the Board for discussion. If you want us to meet with staff we are certainly willing, at your convenience. The property is zoned for boat storage (permitted principal use which merely requires site plan approval- see notice of disapproval dated January 4, 2005). The racks are no different then racks used throughout the Town at other Marinas. My client tells me that he had offered to develop the property with a first class Marina which was opposed. The plan to rehabilitate the property is consistent with the purposes of the Waterfront Revitalization Plan. As a point of history, the site contained the first submarine manufacturing site and has continued in commercial use thereafter. If you need anything further please do not hesitate to contact me. V~r~ t~l ~ yours, cc: Matt-A-Mar By the Bay, LLC PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971-4616 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 March 30, 2005 New York State Department of Environmental conservation Building 40-SUNY Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Att: Regulatory Permits Matt-A-Mar By The Bay, LLC. First & Main Street, New Suffolk SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Dear Sir or Madam; Enclosed please find the following documents pursuant to your instructions: 2. 3. 4. 6. Application and SEQRA Short Environmental Assessment Form 5 Copies of tax map showing location of property Sketch map of boat racks and parking prepared by East End Design Associates Photographs of project area and map with view directions Authorization form Very truly' yours, cc: Michael Raynor Southold Town Planning Board Encl's PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971-4616 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 March 30, 2005 Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold 53095 Route 25 P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE: Matt-A-Mar By The Bay LLC. First & Main Street, New Suffolk SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed please find Wetland Application and fee in the amount 0£$250.00 for the above project. If you have any questions, or require additional data, please contact this office. cc: Michael Raynor Southold Town Planning Board Encl's Very truly yours, Patricia C. Moore PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law $1020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 March 29, 2005 Southold Town Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Att: Bruno (BY HAND) Dear Bruno: Planning Board Re: Matt-A-Mar By the Bay, SCTM%1000-117-08-18 LLC MAR 2 9 In accordance with your request, enclosed are two prints of the construction drawings for the boat racks. These drawings were submitted with our December 21, 2004 application (item %7). These are structural drawings and elevations. The racks will be placed on footings which are also engineered, however, soil compaction tests are required for the engineer to prepare construction drawings of the footings. The engineering of the footings will be done by a NYS licensed design professional upon approval of site plan and prior to submission of building permit. In response to some issues raised at the Planning Board work session: Number of Required parking spaces The dry boat racks have 153 spaces for max. of 153 boats (shown} In the Marina: A. along north and east side of the basin 10 wet slips for in- water boat storage (Marina use from 4/1 through 10/31)- parking reserved (shown) B. Along the west side of the basin 10 boat slips reserved for the Restaurant - 16 parking spaces are allocated to the restaurant with an additional 10 boat slips. (Parking not required for use of slips allocated to restaurant patrons) C. Historically the parking has been shared since there is rarely 100% occupancy of all the uses. This is why land bank parking is recommended. The site plan will be revised to show landscaping within the 10 feet adjacent to First Street and Main Street. Our design professionals recommend "Arborvitae 4' to 5' height, 6' on center". If this is not acceptable please advise. The Board has considered, in the alternative, to provide off street parking for New Suffolk Businesses. This alternative would need to be discussed in more detail with the client. For your information, the DEC has recommended to my client, as well as other Marinas, this dry storage because of the environmental benefits. I understand you are waiting for comments from other agencies, however, it would be helpful to get started with the Town's comments to the extent they are not addressed herein. The Planning Board work session was rushed and I would request their comments in writing to avoid misunderstanding. Also there is an alleged Town drainage easement along the east property line (between New Suffolk Fishing Station and my client's property), please provide me with a copy of this easement so that I can place it on the site plan. We make ourselves available to the Board to review the site plan, however, Mr. Raynor asks that we discuss this site plan in his presence because some of the Board's questions could be addressed immediately. Please provide me with advance notice (telephone call) when this site plan is presented to the Board for discussion. If you want us to meet with staff we are certainly willing, at your convenience. The property is zoned for boat storage (permitted principal use which merely requires site plan approval- see notice of disapproval dated January 4, 2005). The racks are no different then racks used throughout the Town at other Marinas. My client tells me that he had offered to develop the property with a first class Marina which was opposed. The plan to rehabilitate the property is consistent with the purposes of the Waterfront Revitalization Plan. As a point of history, the site contained the first submarine manufacturing site and has continued in commercial use thereafter. If you need anything further please do not hesitate to contact me. very trj yours, - ~tficia C. Moore cc: Matt-A-Mar By the Bay, LLC LEVEL 3 3 BOATS 8,000~ EA. LEVEL 2 3 BOATS ~ 12,500# EA. LEVEL 1 3 BOATS ~ 15,000~ EA. -- 30'-6' -- 30'-6' _P - 30'-6'-- -- 30'-6 .... 30'-6' -- PLAN VIEW (]'YPICAL EACH ROW) - 30'-6 .... 7'-0' !PEN - 30'-6'~ - 30'-6' - FRONT ELEVATION (TYPICAL EACH ROW) TWO ROWS OF RACKS DESIGNED WITH THE FIRST LEVEL OPEN FOR AUTOMOBILE PARKING AUTOMOBILE PARKING 30'-6'- ~ -DETAIL 3 34'-0' ~ ,DETAIL 2 -- --[ 14'-6' -- SECTION A-A DETAIL 3 DIAGONAL CENTER CONNECTION DETAIL 2 FRAME BRACE DETAIL z , nuR!ZUN~, ......... O" 108 E o ~ Et_ Sheet L___~1 .~ Drawing Number 031160 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 March 7, 2005 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.0.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Att: Bruno ,5 LJ~,b Re: Matt-A-Mar By the Bay, LLC SCTM#1000-117-08-18 Dear Bruno: In accordance with your request, enclosed are two prints of the construction drawings for the boat racks. These drawings were submitted with our December 21, 2004 application (item #7). These are structural drawings and elevations. The racks will be placed on footinqs which are also engineered, however, soil compaction tests are required for the engineer to prepare construction drawings of the footings. The engineering of the footings will be done by a NYS licensed design professional upon approval of site plan and prior to submission of building permit. In response to some issues raised at the Planning Board work session: Number of Required parking spaces The dry boat racks have 153 spaces for max. of 153 boats (shown) In the Marina: A. along north and east side of the basin 10 wet slips for in- water boat storage (Marina use from 4/1 through 10/31)- parking reserved (shown) B. Along the west side of the basin 10 boat slips reserved for the Restaurant 16 parking spaces are allocated to the restaurant with an additional 10 boat slips. (Parking not required for use of slips allocated to restaurant patrons) C. Historically the parking has been shared since there is rarely 100% occupancy of all the uses. This is why land bank parking is recommended. The site plan will be revised to show landscaping within the 10 feet adjacent to First Street and Main Street. Our design professionals recommend "Arborvitae 4' to 5' height, 6' on center". If this is not acceptable please advise. For your information, the DEC has recommended to my client, as well as other Marinas, this dry storage because of the envirorumental benefits. I understand you are waiting for comments from other agencies, however, it would be helpful to get started with the Town's comments to the extent they are not addressed herein. The Planning Board work session was rushed and I would request their comments in writing to avoid misunderstanding. Also there is an alleged Town drainage easement along the east property line (between New Suffolk Fishing Station and my client's property), please provide me with a copy of this easement so that I can place it on the site plan. We make ourselves available to the Board to review the site plan, however, Mr. Raynor asks that we discuss this site plan in his presence because some of the Board's questions could be addressed immediately. Please provide me with advance notice (telephone call) when this site plan is presented to the Board for discussion. If you want us to meet with staff we are certainly willing, at your convenience. The property is zoned for boat storage (permitted principal use which merely requires site plan approval- see notice of disapproval dated January 4, 2005). The racks are no different then racks used throughout the Town at other Marinas. My client tells me that he had offered to develop the property with a first class Marina which was opposed. The plan to rehabilitate the property is consistent with the purposes of the Waterfront Revitalization Plan. As a point of history, the site contained the first submarine manufacturing site and has continued in commercial use thereafter. According to Mr. Simon from the Civic Association, he was not present to oppose the application for dry boat storage, he advised me and the Board that he was there merely to monitor the application. If you need anything further please do not hesitate to contact me. Ve~/~.~~~tru y yours, kpatricia c. Moore cc: Matt-A-Mar By the Bay, LLC - ELIZABETH A. NEVI. LL]E TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICF~R RE~CO~IS N~NAG]~r OFI~IC~ FREEDOM OF It~FOE.M3kTION OI~FICER. Town Ha]/, 53095 blain Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New yprk 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telepl~on~ (651)765~1800 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 1~..2QOO Henry Raynor Love Lane Acquisition Corp. 320 Love Lane ~attltuck, New York 11952 Dear Mr. Raynor: Enclosed please find your ~p¥ of-the fully executed Ik:ense agreement for the drainage project on First Street, New Suffolk. Should you have any questions, please call me at "/65-1800. Thank you. Enclosures Very truly yours, Elizabeth A. S'outhold Towr~ Clerk RESOLUTION MAY 9, '2000 RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereb¥'.autl~orizes and directs Supervisor Jean W. Cochran to sign a License Agreement oetv~een t~ne Tewn. of Sot~ho!d and the Love Lane Acq~iSition Carp, as part of a clra[aage: pr, ejec[ on First Street, New Suffolk, .New York, subject to the. approval of the Town Attorney, LICENSE THfS~AGREEMENT, made this BETWEEN day of ,2000 LOVE. LANE ACQUISITION CORP., a corporation of the State of New York having 'its office and principal place Of business at 320 Love Lane, Mattitucl~ New York, l]censor, a~d THE~ ~QWN~ OF .SO:UTHOLD, a muni~-ipal corporation of t~ S~te of New ~o~ng i~ ~ and principal piace of business ~ 63095 M~n~ ~d', ~Otd~ N~ Yo~, lice~ee ' Ot~...~.. i~i~Map.~fS..'~Cf~ o!kOountyasDistrict !0o0 Section 1i?,00 B~ock 08.00 Lot (NI~00.0 and: desci'ibed below: . ALL that certain plot, piece or parce! of land, situate, lying and being at Southold, in the Town of Southold~ County of Suffolk, and state of New YOrk, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the Easterly line of First Street 32' Southerly along sa~l Easterly line from its intersection with the Southerly line of King Street being the'Soathwesterly comer of land of Loria running thence along said land of Loria and into Cutchogue Harbor, South 85 degrees 21 minutes 10 seconds, for a distance of 200 '. THENCE through lands of Love Lane Acquisition Corp. two courses as follows: ~.~__~.0ooooooooooooooo~, 5 degrees 8 mmLrtes East for a distance of 25'; ~. There? Nqrth 85 d,e, grees 21 minutes 10 seconds West for a "~g5 ~,istarl~ of 200 to said easterly line of First Street; THENCE~al6n~g said Easterly line, North 5 degrees 8 minutes East for a distahce of 25' to the point and place of beginning. (hereinafter referred to as "Lot')' and WHEREAS, the licensor's grants the licensee an easement 25 feet in widtl~ to lay pipes for highway drainage purposes and to maintain and operate, relay and remove said pipes on, over and through said Lot for the use of the licensee; and WHEREA,~, the. paffJes hereto want to permit the licensee to have ingress and egress, over sad 'Lot to effect the purposes of said drainage easement and the license granted herein; 'NOW THEREFO,RE,,in consideration of Ten ($10,00) Dollars and other good and valuable c~nsideration, the receipt of whiCh is acknowledged, the licensor hereby gran~ a~d.,~e!eaSee, to th~ licensee a license to have ingress a~,d. egress over S~ ~ ~. lay. pipe,~; {bt high,way dm!~age purposes and !to ~al~ain. and ol3~? ?t.~y and ~0~e r~,ld:l~pes on, ove~; and {hmugh sard"LotP~lrSuent:to ~ ~3~a.. ge,.easen3ent, WhiCh does not inte~ere with ticenS0fs u~e and enjoyffient of'said.Lot; ---,.Seth right shatt be exercised~ve~=mutes~that;eccasien~.th~.!e~pm~bje__=____ damage and inconvenience to the hcensor. Such r,ght ts COncl]t~oned on ~ts reasonable exercise for the benefit of the licensee, and in the event of excessive use, or use for nOndominant purposes, or use by means otherwise injurious to ~ lic~rtsor or.said Lot. the licensor shall h.ave the right to extinguish such-fight The licensee Shall rePair any damage caused by it to the Lot of the licensor, and S, ta!~ i~demnify ~e licensor against any loss and,damage ca~sed by {he exercise ef the t~censee's-ingress and-egress, or by any wrengful or negligent ac~ of emission of' the. licensee or of its agents or eraployees in the course of their employment. The.parties acknowledge and agree that the licensor shall have the absolute right tO terminate this license for any reason or for no reason with or without'cause upor~ notice (written or otherwise) to the licensee. The parties further acknewledge and agree that this license shall terminate and be ~evokedr aatomat[cally and without further action by the party'of the first part Upon the conveyance, lease or other transfer of said Lot. The parties hereby acknowledge and agree that this grant of license shall not be construed to be a grant of an easement, shall not run with the land and shall be binding on and shall inure to only the benefit of the parties hereto and their guests invitees and agents. ] IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the~ parties have'executed.this deed the day and year first above written. LOVE LANE ACQUISITION CORP. HENRYRAY~OR ' ! JI~N W. COCHRAN, Supervisor STATE Of NEW YORK) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) On the ~ day of /~r) { ,2000, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared HENRY RAYNOR, personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his capacity, and that by signature on the instrument, the individual, or the corporation upon behalf of which the individual acted, executed the instrument. 'Notary Public ~TATE OF NEW YORK) $$: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Onthel~f~ dayof a~S~a ,2000, beEoreme, the undersigned, aNotary ,Public in ahd for s te, persena'lly appeared JEAN W. COCHRAN, personally known 4o me or proved to m~ on the basis of satisfacto~ e~,idence to .be the individual whose name is subscribed to the Wj{hin 'instrument and ack~0wledged .to.me that she. executed the same ir~ he~.capacity, and .t'hat by her signature on {he instrument, the individual, or ttie munlcipal.' corporatZon upon behe,f'Of wfl~,h.{he ,ndividbat acted,, e~e, .c~ the'inStrument; Note., Public ~..~- PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. S0L01/0N PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAIIINIG ADD~: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 785-1938 Fax: 631 785-313~ February 4, 2005 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mrs. Moore: Re~ Matt-a-Mar By the Bay Il-/~ ~, ~/ First Street, New Suffolk SCTM #1000-~ Zone M-II cThe above site plan application was reviewed at the Architectural Review Committee //(ARC) meeting held on January 25, 2005. A copy of the meeting minutes is enclosed. Please review the pertinent comments and inform us in writing if you are in agreement with the conditions. In addition, if required, please modify the site/construction plan, and submit the revisions to the Planning Board. If there are any questions, please contact me at (631) 765-1938 ext. 229 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respectfully yours, Senior Site Plan Reviewer enc: ARC minutes SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Janua~ 25,2005 The ARC met at the Town Hall Annex at 4:00 p.m. Members present were Robert I. Brown, Co-Chairman Herbert Ernest, Southold Ronald McGreevy, Mattituck Robert Keith, Mattituck Aisc present were Frank and Chris Kestler for his dental office, Gwendolen Croocock of the Suffolk Times, and Bruno Semon of the Planning Board staff. Moved by Robert Brown and seconded by Herbert Ernest, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the MINUTES of the meeting of January 4, 2005, Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. FRANCIS KESTLER DENTAL OFFICE (Main Road at Pacific Street - Mattituck) SCTM# 1000-142-2-16 Upon learning that handicap ramp would be finished to match the house trim or be left natural and reviewing the lighting fixtures, it was moved by Robert Keith and seconded by Herbert Ernest to ACCEPT the FULFILLMENT of the prior ,/4;ONDITIONS with the FINAL CONDITION that the top and bottom ~f the ramp , balustrades be covered "Vote of the Committee: ayes all. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved drawings without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recission of the original approval and may negatively impact upon securing a Certificate of Occupancy. scuTHOLD FLooRoovERING (46255 North Road- Southold) SCTM# 1000- 55-2-18.1 Moved by Robert Keith and seconded by Ronald McGreevy, it was RESOLVED to ACCEPT FULFILLMENT of those CONDITIONS pertaining to exterior materials and colors, roof penetrations and mechanical equipment provided a location of the latter on the east elevation is at least 80' north of the south property line. The CONDITIIONS pertaining to: 1) signage awaits information about material and lighting and 2) exterior lighting awaits catalogue cuts. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved drawings without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recission of the original approval and may negatively impact upon securing a Certificate of Occupancy. MATT-A-MAR BY THE BAY (First Street - New Suffolk) SCTM# 1000-19-"2-=0-~- Moved by Ron McGreevy and seconded by Robert Keith, it was RESOLVED to TABLE the APPLICATION awaiting visual representation of the boat racks and information about the exterior lighting and signage. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. HILDRETHS DEPARTMENT STORE (Main Road- Mattituck) SCTM#1000-122- 6-29.3 Moved by Herbert Ernest and seconded by Ron McGreevy, it was RESOLVED to TABLE the APPLICATION awaiting complete elevations to agree with the site plan, colors, roof shingle material as well as the other information on the ARC checklist. The applicant is asked to consider treatments to break up the expanse of the roofs, possibly dormers as on the buildings to the west. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. HELLENIC SNACKBAR (Main Road- East Marion) 8CTM#1000-35-2-14) Moved by Herbert Ernest and seconded by Robert Keith, it was RESOLVED to TABLE the APPLICATION awaiting the information on the ARC checklist. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. DAVID ROSE PERENNIALS (5645 Aldrich Lane - Mattituck SCTM#1000-120-3- 11.12 Moved by Herbert Ernest arid seconded by Robert Keith, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the SIGNAGE,as submitted. Vote of the Committee: Ay:'es All. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recission of the original approval and may negatively impact upon securing the Certificate of Occupancy. STANLEY MALLON BUILDING (32845 Main Road - Cu(chogue) SCT~'fOO0- 97-5-4.5 Moved by Robert Keith and seconded by Herbert Ernest, it was RESOLVED to TABLE the APPLICATION awaiting a response to the Committee's comments of June 3, 2003 and the items on the ARC checklist. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. The meeting adjourned at 5:05 p.m. Robert W Keith Secretary FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: January 4, 2005 TO: Matt-A-Mar Marina PO Box 952 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Please take notice that your application dated December 22, 2004 For permit for installation of boat racks for boat storage at Location of property: 650 First Street, New Suffolk CountyTax MapNo. 1000- Section 117 Block8 Lot 18 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction requires site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. t~ ~fi'~hog/~ed S~._ure Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Planning Board 20O4 FORINTERNALUSE SITE PLAN USE DETERMINATION Initial Determlnabon Date: /2 //,2 / 5/ Project Name: ~/-/3-/~ /~¢£/x;4~ Date Sent! Project Address: ~;,,~ Suffolk County Tax Map No.:1000- /IF - ,Y - /~ Zoning District: (Note: Copy of Building Permit Application and supporting documentation as to proposed use or uses should be submitted.) Initial Determination as to whether use is permitted: Initial Determination as to whether site plan~is-reflei~d~/~ ,~z,4~ ,E'~-"-r.2 o//P~Z~ ~. -:[~ning Depa~ment (P.D.) Referra ~ec ed: /~ /~ /~ , Date of Comment: /~ ,; ~ Sign~¢re o~lahnin0 ~e~L~t¢ff B~viewer ,Final Determination ~q ['~ ~ " Date:O/ /O~ / FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY SITE PLAN USE DETERMINATION Initial Determination Date: /~ / ~-~ / ~ Project Name: Date Sent: Project Address: ~-.5~.~ F/,4's~- ,~T, . ,v'~-~ 50,~'7Z~_ Suffolk County Tax Map No.:lO00- //~z . ,y _ /j, Zoning District: ~ (Note: Copy of Building Permit Application and supporting documentation as to proposed use or uses should be submitted.) Initial Determination as to whether use is permitted: Initial Determination as to whether site plang~mquir~dL~#--~-~c'z,'~.,v ,~'-c2o,,/Pc~7~ ---- S'lg n a u~/~____~g Ihspector Planning Department (P.D.) Referral: P.D. Date Received: /.~ /~ /o~' Date of Comment: /.2 /,,~;~ /o,~' Final Determination ~Signat~re ot~Plafinin~.D_ept. Staff Revi~w_?r Date: / / Decision: Signature of Building Inspector State existing use and occupancy of pren3is, es and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy - b. Intended use and occupancy I)~o tO Nature of work (check which applicable): New Building t~ Addition Alteration Repair Removal Demolition Other Work Estimated Cost Fee ,,%~ O C) (Description) If dwelling, number of dwelling units If garage, number of cam (To be paid on filing this application) Number of dwelling units on each floor 6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use. 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front Height Number of Stories Rear Depth _ Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Rear Depth Height. Number of Stodes 8. )imensionsofentirenewconstmction:Front [~,~ Rear i 5~,~ Depth //7¢ Height ._3 ,/It / Number of Stories__ ~ 9. Sizeoflot:l~r~'h~Y ,~/o' Rear -~.~-~ Depth ~ro~ 10. Date of Purchase Name of Former Owner 11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated ?~/'~]~//7 f 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? YES NO 13. Will lot be re-graded? YES NO ~/'~ill excess fill be removed from premises? YES NO 14. Names of Owner of premises Ad&essSy~.c,,~Ot~£0. S~,,r~,.q Phone No. Name ofAxchitect £,4sf£dt) I)i I~'/ /4~S~c, Address*7;~t,t~o,n aS~,~t~, ~'0s¢ Phone No ,Tt'.s-- Name of Con~'actor Ad&ess Phone No. 15 a. Is this property within 100 feet ora tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES NO J * IF soLrrI- OLD TOWN TRUST S & D.n.C. PnRMrrs..MA¥ OE REQUmED. b. Istmspropertywithin300feetofatidalwetland?*YES 1/ NO * IF YES, D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16. Provide survey, to scale, with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 17. If elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below, must provide topographical data on survey. STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COLINTY~.~~.~OF~...~z~ ,,, being duly sworn, deposes and says that (s)he is the applicant (Name"w~dividual siEming contract) above named, (S)He is the /",~ ,z..~,r~z-~ (Contractor, Ag~, C~rl~rate Officer, etc.) ~z said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to rnalt~ and f'tle this application; that all stateraents contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that the work w~ll be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. MELAN[E DOROSKI NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New Y0~ No. 01D04634870 0ualitied in Suffo k County -~ ^^, Commission Ex, oires September 30,,CIC~[D Signature of Applicant MATf-A-MAR MARINA, LLC PO BOX 952 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935-0952 ORDER OF ~ SUFFOLK COUNTY NATIONAJ. BANK CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 50-546/214 329 ':O;~&l, 051~,l~,; El, OOi~qsE 3,' APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Date INSTRUCTIONS a. This application MUST be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 4 sets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and waterways. c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Certificate of Occupancy. f. Every building permit shall exp/re if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months a~r the date of issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date. If no zoning amt~d~nt~ or Other regulatio~ af-f~lg the property have been enacted in the interim, the Building Inspector may authorize, in writing, the extension of the permit for an addition six momhs. Thereafter, a new permit shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws, O~nances or Regulations, for the construction of buildiags, additions, or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described. The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, building code, housing c~and~gulatioas, and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder (As on the ta~ roll or latest deed) If applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer (Name and title of corporate officer) Builders License No. Plumbers License No. Electricians License No. Other Trade's License No. 1. Location of land on which proposed work will be done: House Number Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section //~ Block ~ Lot / ~ Subdivision Filed Map No. ~,,,. Lot A A LEVEL 3 3 3OATS e 8,000# EA, LEVEL 2 3 BOATS ~ 12,500# EA, LEVEL I 3 BOATS 8 15,000# EA, NOTE~ RACKS TO DE LOADED PER SPECIFICATIONS AS QUOTED, DO NOT OVERLOAD SYSTEM. SERIOUS BODILY INJURY AND/OR PROPERTY DAMA6£ COULD RESULT. -- 30' 6" ~ ~ 30'-6' 30'-6' 30'-6' 30'-6" 14'-6' PLAN VIEW (TYPICAL EACH ROW) -- 30'-6' 30'-6' t 7'-0' I~PEN 30'-6' P AUTOMOBILE PARKING 30'-6" 30'-6' 30'-6' FRONT ELEVATION (TYPICAL EACH ROW) TWO ROWS OF RACKS DESIGNED WITH THE FIRST LEVEL OPEN '91 ~ -DETAIL 3 34'-0' ~ --I 14'-6' i-- SECTION A-A I 34'-0' DETAIL 3 DIAGONAL CENTER CONNECTION DETAIL 2 FRAME BRACE DETAIL FOR AUTOMOBILE PARKING PARTS LIST PART ND, BESCRIPI ION LENG IH ] QFY. ,~' W6 COLUMN .~. 2 HO R2~O~Z A5 .... 14'-~' 7~ 3 DIAGONAL ~5~-0 4 wi4 SHELF BEAM HVY 30'-0' 30 ~ ...... -¢~ S--HEL~ BEAN ~) ~0'-0 L__~__ W14 SHELF BEAM LT, 30'-0' j 7 TIMBER CLAMPS Revision No, C) ~ Z cf m 0 'r n Drawn By DH iDate 11-10-03 Scale NTS Drawing Number 031160 PATI~CLA C. iYIOORE: Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11952 Tek (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret R-utkowski Secretary December21, 2004 Ms. Jeri Woodhouse, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Matt-A Mar By The Bay, LLC. First and Main Street, New Suffolk SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Zoning Code: Marine II Dear Ms. Woodhouse: Enclosed is a site plan application for Matt-A-Mar By The Bay, LLC. Please find the following: 1. Site plan application 2. Check in the amount of $1,578.60 3. Applicants Affidavit 4. Applicants agreement on Site Plans 5. Long Environmental Assessment Form 6. Site Plans 7. Building Elevations 8. Color photos and elevations If you require additional information, please contact this office. Very truly yours, c~ Patricia C. Moore Encl'8 Dave & Bill Roof... "When it comes to Dry Storage.... our advanced knowledge and years of construction experience .... unquestionably makes us the Leader in RG YARD STANDS RG/RP SERIES PORTABLE FREE ROOF ONLY 3 SIDED GABLED 51020 Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 (631) 765-4330 SIGNED A 30'-6' 30'-6' 30'-6' 30'-6' '~n'-r-.- PLAN VIEW (TYPICAL EACH ROW) LEVEL 3 8,000# EA. P ? P p ~ AUTOMOBILE 7'-0' ~PEN PARKING L 30'-6' 30'-6' 30'-6' 30'-6' 30'-6' LEVEL 8 3 BOATS 18,500# EA. LEVEL I 3 BOATS 8 15,000# EA. FRDNT ELEVATIDN (TYPICAL EACH ROW) T~/O RO~/S OF RACKS DESIGNED ~/ITH THE FIRST LEVEL DPEN FOR AUTOMOBILE PARKING 14'-6' 34'-0' ----4 14'-6' SECTION A-A -DETAIL 3 DE;AIL I 34'-0' DETAIL 3 DIAGONAL CENTER CONNECTION DETAIL 8 FRAME BRACE DETAIL W!4 SHELF TIMBER C L.,~MP } Revision No. i Drawn By ' DH ~ Date , 11-10-03 Scale Nl'S Sheet 1 Drawin~ ~umber 031160 ST. ~' ~ pECONIC B~ CUTCHOGUE HARBOR NOTICE ~ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK F~cAL Fi~°(~T'f T~J( S~q~1~ AO~Y.I'IA~TI~JkIC~A~'i~Ti~SALE (~~ Red ~ty Tax ~vice A~y SEC[ION NO PROPERTY MAP 473889 sOUTHOLD ;RPS ASSESSMENT INQUIRY~ SCHOOL NEW SUFFOLK SC~ ~CLS 447 TRUCK TEP/~NL 117.-8-18 650 FIRST ST = OWNER & MAILING INFO ===1=MISC LOVE LANE IRS-SS ACQUISITION CORP 1 320 LOVE I2~ BANK BOX 1459 MATTITUCK NY 11952 DATE : 12/22/2003 ROLL SEC TAXABLE TOTAL RES SITE TOTAL COM SITE ACCT NO 23 I .............. ASSESSMENT DATA ........... I **CURRENT** RES PERCENT ILAND 18,700 **TAXABLE** ITOTAL 23,600 COUNTY 23,600 **PRIOR** TOWN 23,600 ILAND 18,700 SCHOOL 23,600 ITOTAL 23,600 ==DIMENSIONS ===1 ....... SALES INFORMATION ........................... ~,045,288 ACRES 3.25 IBOOK 11694 SALE DATE 08/15/94 SALE PRICE IPAGE 302 PR OWNER sHAMROCK PROP CORP ....... TOTAL EXEMPTIONS 0 ............. I== TOTAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS 4 ..... CODE AMOUNT PCT INIT TERM VLG HC OWN CODE UNITS PCT TYPE VALUE ]FD029 Fi=NEXT PARCEL 75.10- 03-050 ~PK090 IWW020 ISW011 F3=NEXT EXEMPT/SPEC F6=GO TO INVENTORY F9=GO TO XREF F4=PREV EXEMPT/SPEC F10=GO TO MENU Dennis &: Diane Harkoff October 10, 2002 RESTAURANT Fine Food, Spirits & Sports Mr. Peter Harris Superintendent, Southold Town Highway Dpt. PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Parking on First Street, New Suffolk Dear Mr. Hams: Well, golly gee, is anybody home? I'm disappointed to say that I've had no answer, or even acknowledgment for that matter, to my original letter of May 13, 2002 and my follow-up this past summer. Just a little sign of life would go a long way! Thank you for your help. P.O. Box 321 .835 First Street. NewSuflblk, NewYork 11956 Tel: ..... ' · 631-~34-)123 Fax:631-734-2642 www.nor thfork.com/legends Dennis & Diane Harkoff May 13, 2002 RESTAURANT Mr. Peter Hams Superintendent, Southold Town Highway Dpt. PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Fine Food, Spints&Sports RE: Parking on First Street, New Suffolk Dear Mr. Harris: Currently, we rent parking space for Legends' customers on the east side of First Street from the Raynors (Love Lane Acquisitions). Street parking has always been allowed in New Suffolk, but after we opened up in 1993 some of the community was upset about cars being parked in the streets, too close to their driveways. They also were not pleased with the slightly haphazard way people tried to parallel park without the aid of curbs and painted lines to delineate the spaces. The Raynors offered us a parking area for our customers for what was originally a nominal monthly rent, but one that has crept steadily upwards over the years. As you may be aware, the Raynor' s future expansion plan shows that our leased parking area will be abolished. Although nothing has been approved yet, the community has already started voicing their concerns about "Where are o le pep going to park?" and "What are you going to do about it?", etc. Well, we have ambivalent feelings about this whole parking saga. On the one hand, we absolutely relish the idea of not having to pay $400.00 a month for parking! On the other hand, our neighbors and our customers will be upset with the helter-skelter street parking that would ensue without a designated area, as they were when we first opened up in 1993. We would like to propose another idea, one that we think could be an amenable solution for both our neighbors and our customers, as well as for our pocketbook! Why couldn't the town make diagonal parking on that portion of our current parking area that is on town property? The severity of the angle could be determined depending how many feet of town property lies beyond the paved road. Diagonal parking would certainly fit far more cars than parallel parking could offer and would certainly be more neat & organized looking. It might be a simple way to resolve everyone's problem. Remember, "for every problem there's a solution". Your mission, should you choose to accept it (and I trust you will), is to help me find the solution! If for any reason you find that my idea is not feasible, please provide an alternative proposal. We would love to hear more about it. Sincerely, Diane Harkoff P.O. Box 321 · 835 First Street · New Suffolk, New York 11956 · Tel: 631-734-5123 · Fax: t331-734-2642 www.nor thfork.com/legends CC: Josh Horton, Supervisor Benny Orlowski, Chairman Planning Board John Romanelli, Councilperson Craig Richter " Bill Moore Louisa Evans " Tom Wickham Yard Scale: SITE PLAN STATUS REPORT SITE PLAN TYPE: AMENDED NEW WITHDRAWN INCOMPLETE PRO~ECTNAME: ½'1~4~, ,4 /~4F~ ~-4~ ,~~ zo~:,~.~-zo~2: LOCATION: ~o tt~,~ ,-¥'. ~ ~/,-e-7'- (.,jHAMLET: SCTM#~000- l I-/ - ~; - ~. APPLICANT NAME: /d~.J i/,J~:~ _ - TEL# (.__) AGENTNAME: ~c~'- ~c~_...~ TEL#(~)76~- ~-~0 ZONE3: IPROJECT DESCRIPTION I Tins SI~PL~ISFOR /?~,~,~ ,/..~/~ 0~7~'2~' THE ~'~-' ZONE LOCATED AT___ _ IN. SCTM# 1000- - ON --,~.,~ ACRES PARCEL IN __ __ ( SEE ABOVE). BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICE: S/P REQUIREI~Y~)R N PRE-SUBMISSION WRITTEN REQUEST: ?RE-SUBMISSION CONFERENCE (WITHIN 30 DAYS OF WRITTEN REQUEST) INFORMAL REQUEST FOR REVISIONS: PRE-WORK SESSION: ~PPLICATION RECEIVED DATE:]~/,~/O~, APPLICATION PROCESS DATE: PAYMENT RECEIVED: AMOLrNT REC~IVED:$ /~r) ,~. ~'~r FEE AMOUNT: ($300.X =$ ~'~.~ )+($.05 X /'~ o~ SF=$ ZBA APPEAL REQUIRED V O1~'~ DATE / / UNLISTED: ) / / ~PROVALS REQUIRED: REFERRED DATE NOTES APPROVAL DATE NOTES 3UILOING DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATION: ,/~ :~ ~ ~ _~_1:.~1(~ rOWN ENGINEER ~PROVAL: / ~1~1~ I I DEP.OF T~SPO~ATION: DO~, D~, TOS / / / / SUFFOLK COUN~ DEPARTMENT OF P~NING: ~1~1~ I I $UFFOLK COUN~ DEPT OF H~LTH: PERMIT ~: / / L ICONDITIONAL FINAL:___ FINAL: '' / / ENDORSEMENT OF SITE PLAN: :IELD INSPECTION FOR C/O: !DISTRIBUTE APPROVED SITE PLANS TO: BUILDING DEPT NOTES / /__ TOWN ENG / / GENERAL NOTES: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Fax: 631 765-3136 APPLICAllON FOR CONSIDERATION OF A SITE PLAN New Change qf Use Re-use Extension Revision of Approved Site Plan Name of Business or Site: SCTM #: Location: Address: Name of Applicant: Telephone: Agent or Pe~on responsible Address:' ~ Telephone: Site plans prepared by: Llcer~se No, Address: Telephone: Page 2 Planning Board Site Plan Application APPUCAN¥S AFFIDAVIT SLATE OF NEW YORK COUNIY OF SUFFOLK /~'~('~-/~ ;~, d'///C-C ? c~ being duly sworn, deposes and says that: he resides in ~e Sta~e ¢ New York, and that he is the above properS, or tha~ he is ~he ~ltle (Specl~ w~ther Pa~hlp or Corp./ which is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land WhiCh are not shown on the Site Plan; that the UUe to the enUre parcel, Including all rights-of-way, has been clearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan Infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Slta Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical Improvements will be Installed in s~rict accordance With the plans subml~ed. Signed (Partner er Corporate Officer and Title) Sworn ,to me this ( ~,I~ day of (Notary Public) MELISSA McGOWAN Notary Public, State of New ~ No, 4995913 ~ ~lualified inSuffolk County ~ission E~res May 4, Planntng Board Site Plan Application 3, ~ Total Land Area of Site (acres e~ square-f~ag~- ~g~Zoning Dlstdct Existing Use of Site ~ 7 o ,~ ~ ,~ ~ J~o~-j'_5/'c 44¢£--4. ¢~P~roposed Uses on Site. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more than one use Is proposed per building, Indicate square footage of floor area that will be reserved per use. .... GROSS Floor Area of Existing Structure(s) "~. ~-' ~' ~L.~ Cross Floor Area of Proposed Structure(s) ' ,2 °/~ Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) g,~'~ I ?/ ~I' Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) Percent of Lot for Landscaping (where applicable) Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by j-/o Board of Appeals - Case # & date ~o Board of Trustees - Case # & date h' 0 NY State Department of Environmental Conservation - Case # & date i~o Suffolk County Department Health Services - Case Cf & date Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision Expiration Date Other Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permlfm been obtained? Name of Issuing agency Number and date of permit issued. NO ACTION (EXCAVATION 01~ CONS[RUCTION) MAY BE UNDE£1'AKE~t UNTIL APP£OVAL OF SI}-E PLAN BY PLANNING BOARD. VIOLATORS ARE SUBJECT FO P£OSECUT/ON Site Plan Applications Public Hearings Under the current site plan application procedure, the process for reviewing a site plan application is: a public hearing is not scheduled and held by the Planning Board until after, among other things, the site plan has received a stamped Health Department approval. The applicant shall now have the following options: To follow the established procedure, or To have the Planning Board schedule and hold a public hearing on the site plan application and have the Planning Board vote on the proposed conditional Site plan prior to the applicant receiving Health Departr~ent approval subject to the following conditions: The applicant hereby agrees and understands that if the site plan which receives stamped-Health Department approval differs in any way from the proposed conditional site plan on which the Planning Board held a public hearing and voted on, then the Planning Board has the right and option, if the change is material to any of the issues properly before the Planning Board, to hold a public hearing on this "revised" site plan application and review its conditional approval. The applicant agrees not to object to a new public, hearing and Planning Board review of the revised application. Applicant Agreement on Site Plans. The applicant is aware of the terms of this approval.and certifies to these terms by his/her signature below. SOTM#:1000- //7- Oc~-- !~ The Town of Southotd's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of inter'st On tile part of town officers and employees. The u~ose of thin form is to provide information which can alsrt the town 05 ponnible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever actios is necsnsar~ to avoid same, YOUR NAHF.: Other o~ner~hlp of (or employment by) a corporation in uhich Name of person employed Dy the Town of SoutDold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship betwee, yourself (the applicant) and the town officer or employee. E[the~ check the appropriate line A) through D) and/o~ describe in the ~pace p~ov[ded. The town officer o$ employee or Ills or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all tDat apply), [na corporatLon); DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSDIp FEE CALCULATION TOWN CODE for SITE PLAN FEES: $300.00 per acre or fraction thereof: 3.5 acres (4) ($300.00) = $1,200.00 .05 new building area Racks 7,572 sq. ft. ~ .05 = $ 378.60 TOTAL $1,578.60 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whetber an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to arlow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site, By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part 1 ~ Part 2 ~Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, tbemfore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Mat A Mar Expansion Name of Action Southold Town Planning Board Name of Lead Agency Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency //~nature of~espons[ble Officer in Lead Agency website Chairperson Title of Responsible Offi, F~er Signature of Prepare~'~f different ~om responsible officer) February 14, 2006 Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to comprete Parts 2 and 3. It ,S (-xpected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, res' ~rch or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) State ~/7 Zip Co~e II ? 7J Name of Owner (if different) ,J~ /~ F T' // - ill? -/ Business Telephone State .v93 // Zip Code Description of Action: Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: D Urban D Industrial D Commercial D Residential (s,uburban) [] Forest [] Agriculture [~r~ther Rural (non-farm) Total acreage of project area: 3 ~ ~ acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION ,~ ,~~ acres -~ ' ~ acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: r~well drained /¢~ % of site ~Poorly drained __ % of site El Moderately well drained % of site. b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? -~ acres {see 1 NYCRR 370). Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site;' [] Yes ~ a, What is depth to bedrock ~ (in feet) 5, ~ate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: L_~.0-10% (~) % ~10-15% % r~15% or greater__ 6. Is project substantia[~ontiguous t~ain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places7 [ J Yes ~ V1 No 7. [s project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? [] Yes 8. What is the depth of the water table? ~tl (infect)'D~./~/ ~s~'O ~'~l~J-~ 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole sourqe aquifer? [] No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [] Yes N[~o Page 3 of 21 1 1. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? DYes ~;~o~ According to: Identify each species: 1 2. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? ° DYes ~ Describe: I I 13. Is the project site p~d by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? DYes ~No If yes, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? DYes [~'~o 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: b. Size (in acres): Page 4 of 21 a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? M Yes [] No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? [~es DNo . , 18. is the site located in an agricultural dist~ed pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and U']Yes [~o 19. is the site located in or substantially coJ>~ous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the EC~. and 6 NYCRR 6177 []Yes 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes7 [] Yes B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions es appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: --~ · ,~'~"' acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: ////.~._ acres initially; ~ acres ultimately· c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: ~ acres. d, Length of project, in miles: .... (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. f, Number of off-street parking spaces existing g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 3 J~ height; j/../~ i , width; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ~ '~ ~ ft. 2.How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed DYes DNo ; proposed ~ C. (upon completion of project)? Condominium length. __ tons/cubic yards· b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~Yes c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [] Yes How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? acres. Page 5 of 21 9. 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project __ 1 1. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ~ Yes If yes, explain: Will any mature for~00 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project7 [] Yes~Lic,j[ No If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: ~ months, (including demolition) If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated __ (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: __ month year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: __ month __ year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases;' [] Yes [] No Will blasting occur during construction? [] Yes ~ Number of jobs generated: during construction ~ ; after project is complet~ 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved7 ~ Yes If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? L.J Yes ~o Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ~ Yes ~ If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ~ []No 16. Will the project generate solid waste7 [] Yes ~ a. If yes, what is the amount per month? tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [] Yes [] No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill7 DYes Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: 1 7. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste7 DYes a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? __ tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated sit~ life? years. J 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? [~Yes ~No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? [] Yes ~ / ?O. Wiilprojectproduceoperatingnoiseexceedingthelocalamb~levels? []Yes'No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? [] Yes I ~! No If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day ' gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? [] Yes ~ If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: , ~City Town Vilage Board Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Planning Board Yr~es [] No City, Town Zoning Board ~Yes J~No City, County Health Department ~ Yes ~ No Other Local Agencies [] No Other Regional Agencies DYes ~No State Agencies ~Yes D No Federal C. Zoning and Planning Information ~ 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision7J~es [ No If Yes, indicate decision required: []Zoning amendment ~plan ,: BI Zoning variance [ Spedial use permit []New/revision of master plan J'~lResource management plan D Subdivision r~ Other Page 8 of 21 What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site7 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? l ..... L 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? [~es [] No What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications Within a ~A mile radius of proposed action? If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? /~///'~' a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [] Yes [~o 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? DYes DNo If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? [] Yes 1 2. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? [] Yes [~No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. DYes [] No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. ~f there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Date If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment, Page 10 of 21 473889 SOUTHOLD 117.-8-18 650 FIRST ST = OWNER & MAILING INFO === =MISC LOVE LANE AQUISITION CORP RS-SS 275 CARDINAL DR 1 MATTITUCK NY 11952-1940 BANK NYSRPS ASSESSMENT INQUIRY SCHOOL NEW SUFFOLK SCH ~CLS 447 TRUCK TERMNL DATE : 01/13/2005 ROLL SEC TAXABLE TOTAL RES SITE TOTAL COM SITE ACCT NO 23 I======== ====== ASSESSMENT DATA =========== I **CURRENT** RES PERCENT ILAND 18,700 **TAXABLE** ITOTAL 23,600 COUNTY 23,600 **PRIOR** TOWN 23,600 ~LAND 18,700 SCHOOL 23,600 ITOTAL 23,600 ==DIMENSIONS ===1======= SALES INFORMATION ================================== ACRES 3.25 IBOOK 11694 SALE DATE 08/15/94 SALE PRICE 2,045,288 IPAGE 302 PR OWNER SHAMROCK PROP CORP =======TOTAL EXEMPTIONS 0 =============l== TOTAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS 4 ===== CODE AMOUNT PCT INIT TERM VLG HC OWN CODE UNITS PCT TYPE VALUE Fl=NEXT PARCEL 75.10- 03-050 IFD029 IPK090 IWW020 ISW011 F3=NEXT EXEMPT/SPEC F6=GO TO INVENTORY F9=GO TO XREF F4=PREV EXEMPT/SPEC F10=GO TO MENU IIOWN OF SOUTHOLI Purchase Order # -~4386 Tax Exempt # A163554 Date March 14, 2006 Account # B8020 4 500 300 JDeliver billing to: and send Department PLANNING BOARD Address J Vendor ~ lql~l Nelson Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, NY 11747 I I VENDOR **Return this copy and Town of Southold voucher itemized and signed for payment** ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION Inv.#3877 re Matt-a-Mar By the Bay SCTM#1000-117-8-18 SEQR Review UN IT COST TOTAL $112.50 THIS PURCHASE ORDER IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURES OF THE DEPT. HEAD AND THE SUPERVISOR I CERTIFY THAT THERE ARE SUFFICIENT FUNDS AVAILABLE IN THE APPROPRIATION CHARGED I CERTIFY THIS T'O BE A JUST AND TRUE PURCHASE ORDER Supervisor VENDOR COPY TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1, Th? TOWN OF SOUTHOLD is not responsible for materials, supplies.or equipment delivered or ~e,~vices performed without ~uthority of written order. Quantities specified are not to ~ ex c~d~ 2 No ch~ge~ moy ~ made ~n V. Js order witho~t written authority of the supervisor. ~ h s~t u .:4 de~i~:'y' w:Jt be made al deC,very point unless otherwise sp~fied. Materials must h*~ ~: ,>p*:, 1! 9.: .~..Jed w,tmat;~;u ,,at,. o, wih not be accepted, include itemized packir, d lists with ,¢~ ;h~pm;nts O~ve~-¢ irdoor~ : requhvd :mia%otherwise specified. Al! prices quoted mustin ..,L- ~ · shi[ pinT. h. ndlir~, [~ackm ) a~ d cr:~ti ~g charges and be F O.B delivered, un,ess other terms , : ./ , , c ,~ '?,t, - in w ,31e or ;~ [;&rt ¢ mr, ~.e~ ~c . notify the totten i ¢~:adi~tely. !n :, .' .~.'.E ¢; ", ;: ~z; 545LIb'CeE; ::q(~ hO;~ (¢'e ~,,i:f~dcr respc~nsihle for any EXCE:ES CO¢,, EX a. '-~¢..mr.!,;, d]ad (:efehd :cti(..ns ~' ,.:a~,'~ [)~odgh~ and ,hold the ~own of Southold, its ~.:'~? Jar do; skaH comply with S~ctions 220, 220 a, 22.'}b, 220 c, the .¢b~? Lew of the Sta~e of New Y~..~k re!atari9 to maximum work ~ ~ge: 3t ,- ~3~{o~¢tts ar,d p~ohibiting ,~e%rM~nat~on on account of ~ace, natona! ¢ [gi~ hthh r.9emp[oVeeswithin the StateofNew Vork h~volved n~ater~a ;, eq,Jlo~.,~e ~t or supplies specified in this order. )e(,o; 103a - "~03b of th: Generai ~ d.l;clp, i L:-'.w per 7. iN ,(liL:£ ~;: ; EF. OE~E!~ C)i"4 ENCLOSE;.: C'.~AIh:~ FORM MUST BE iTEMIZED IN DETAIL. Ciaims fi)r partia! deli,Caries are not allowed un,ess indicated. Claims in question will constitute a ~'or, di~iof l.:~ec,.';de~t t" the right of thr¢ Ce,~do~ or receive any payment and matters of dispute must ~: adius~ed befo~'e final acceptance Dy the Town of Southold. 8.8illin9 ~hal~ allow for exemption from taxes under Federal Excise Tax Exemption Certificate No A-t63554 held by the Town of Southo!d. 9. C~sh d;~count ~crms r~ust be indicated {~n c!aim voucher; discount period will be computed from date of acceptance of delivery o~ rec~ipi of a correct claim voucher, whichever is later. 10. The provisions of d~e New York State Fair Trade Law (Feld-Crawford Act) and the Federal Pdc~ Discrimi!~;tion Ijw (Robinson-Patman Act) do not apply to purchases made by the Town of Sour.hold, 11 A![ P,O ./Claim~: mr,~.~t be audited, and approved by the Town Board prior to actual payment. HB Mil 1000 Date: 05/23/05 Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Receipt#: 4232 Transaction(s): 1 1 Seqra Review Reference~ Subtotal 117-8-1 '~' $850.00 Check#: 4232 Total Paid: $850.00 Name: Matt, A Ma in P O Box 952 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Clerk ID: LINDAC Internal ID: 117-8-18 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM RECEIVED To: Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk MAY 2 3 2005 From: Planning Department $oothold Town Clerk Date: May 20, 2005 Re: Check(s) Enclosed herewith is/are the check(s) listed below. Please return a receipt to us. Thank you. Project Name Project SCTM # Amount Check Type # Matt-A-Mar by the Site Plan 117-8- $850.00 4232 Bay 18 SEQRA Review Fee enc(s). PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OP'FICE LOCATION: Town Hail Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk Planning Department May 20, 2005 Check(s) Enclosed herewith is/are the check(s) listed below. Please return a receipt to us. Thank you. Project' Name Project SCTM # Amount Check . . Type # ~a~' by the Site Plan 117-8- $850.00 4232 SEQRA Review · ._. Fee MATT-A-MAR MARINA, LLC PO BOX 952 CUTCH(X~UE, NY t1935-0952 4232 5/12/2005 NY 11971-0959 . Matt-A-Mar on the Bay ,'OOh ;~ :[ ;=,' ,.'0 ~ l,l, 0 Town ©f Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 01/06/05 Transaction(s): Application Fees Receipt#: 3293 Subtotal $1,578.60 Check#: 3293 Total Paid: $1,578.60 Name: Matt, A Mar Marina P.o. Box 1235 Mattituck, NY 11952 Clerk ID: LYNDAB Internal ID: 104735 PLANNING BOARD M~MBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: From: Date: Re: Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk Planning Department December 29, 2004 Check(s) Enclosed herewith is/are the check(s) listed below. Please return a receipt to us. Thank you. Project Name Project Type SCTM # Amount Check# Matt-A-MarBy-the-Bay, LLC Site Plan 117-8-18 $1578.60 3293 enc(s). I{ING STREET N/O/~ ,, . 83'47'30" E S 83'29'29" E 113.47' pP. OPOSED LOCATION OF NEH ~EPTIG ~Y~TEH ~ I I ' ' ' :'~ :S 83'45'00" N 83'05'30" W 204.443' SITE PLAN ~/o/r ROBIN IS~4NS HOLDINGS LLC. / LOE, ATION~ OF'~LL ~ | P_XCAXV, C,TINC~. HAINT, C, IN I PROPEf~,SEPARATION~. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.G.V,D, 1929 DATUM EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS:~ EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS:- --5-- -- N/O/F TOFN OF SOUTHOLD (UNDERWATER LAtfD) P T OAP, Ol~ ~ITHIN THE ~AININ¢ ~LL~, ~EE (4) ~ ~ ~ANSION P~L5 ~P). TEST HOLE B1 TEST HOLE (TEST HOLE DU® BT i"IOE:)ONALE) ®EOgGIENC. E ON MA'~ Iq, .2005) E S 29'07'10" E 35.11' S 81'15'12" F 91J S 74'46'39,, 62, 60' N 88'43'35" W 176J JO" HALL HITHIN 20' OF '' ",'£ ,.oo. ~',~LiNBOpN£,YORKSTAT, LANDOiMNT. , .......... B2 LOCATION HAP: NOT TO SC, ALE PROPOSED SITE PLAN: 5lYE PLAN OF= NEH ~:{IFFOLK HAP-BOP. 51~JAIED AT NEN ~UFFOLK TONN OF ~HOLD 5L.T.H., 1000-111~-16 ZONIN~ DISTRICL H~I~-2 ~E: ~T~T, 5TO~ ~LY b, 2~ ~E= I":~' A~ OP A~A OF ~1~1~, L ~ILDIN~ 'A' 2, ~ILDI~ '~' ~. ~ILDI~ BASED ON ORlelNAL SURVEY JOSEPH IN6E6NO LAND SURVEYOR ~22 ROAI~KE AV~ APPLICANT: I~0 INLET VIEH EAST (6~1) EXISTINg, ~ 14~24,q3 5~.42~Ar-,) NL. 1,4~3055~, NL. 616.08 5.F. NL. SANITARY STSTEH CALCULATIONS: ALLONAOLE FLOH (DENSITY)~ 6ROUNDI.~A1]~R MANAGEMENT ZONE, IV ALLOHABLE FLOH FOR ~ITE = ¢00 EPO/AORE PE'51¢N 6AL6ULATIONS, EXISTIN¢, DJILPlNE, 'A' f'RESTAURANT'), 'BAR': I~ 5EATS, 'RESTAURANT': 45 5~ATS= 'OUTSIDE DININS', 40 5EATS, TOTAL BLNLDIN5 'A', SANITARY (OPD) elO 6PO: 450 6PO 6FO = 200 6PP ~¢0 ~ Bi)ILDIN~ 'B* ('PRY 5TOP. A~E/OEN. INPlJSI~IAL')= 1,46187 5.F. X 0.04 ¢.PD.: BUILDIh~ 6 (DRY 5TORA~E/E~.Jq. II~DUSTRIAL~, 616.0~ 5.F. X 0.04 6.P.O. = BOAT 5LIPS, 20 BOAT 5LIP5 X I0 TOTAL ALLBglLPlNC-5= 05 6PO: 65 C..-t~ 020 C-PD: qO0 6PO omo 5FO = 400 ~PP I~b5 eF~ 2,145 6PO 2,4r~34 6.P.D. A'BDIP. EVI ATI ONS ~ .. :m I z PAGE: FINI.eHED EL/ 5.15' HIN PITCH,V4 PEP, I = 2.42' N.T.S. UNDJ~P.~¥JNO OAND AND eRA'VEL I, COLLA~ DEPTH 15 NOT P. EG~JIRED HHEN RATEABLE MATERIAL EXISTB FOR PULL DEPTH, N.T.S. PINISHE[ I/4" PER I' (2,~) ~ E ,~.- /-MANHOLE AT I/g." PEG 2 INV. EL, OUT~ I.q2'- COVER AND FRAME bEEHAH FOUNDRY 60. MODEL NO. R~,F~2-NH HINC:h~ED H/LOCKING DEVICE AT C-RAPE 25~"x4~/4'' H-20 LOADING (COVER AND FRAHE lflEEHAH FOUNDRY CO. i'viODEL NO, R-666~-KH I IHIN~D ~ L~KIN6 PROVIDE LOCK AND REMOVADLE HANDLE 4'~o" I.D. PI;;~ECAST CONE, MANHOLE SIM TO FORT MILLER CO. OEZURIK PLUO VALVE 2 COUNT N.T.S. / / \ / / / I \ \ 4" C.I, INLET Ff~DM SEPTIC TANK (2) DISCHARGE LINED TO DISTRIBUTION POOL BRONZE BALL- VALV~ 5IPIILAR TO 5qO SERIES - E. COUNT SEE MALVIN¢ SCHEMETIC 15/P2 FOR VALVE POSITION 2" DRAIN FROM VALVE BOX 5LOPE)~" / FT INTO MANHOLE 2" PUMP DI~.HAROE LINE - TYP ,6'-0" I.D. PRECAST COlt, kD MANHOLE SIM FORT MILLER CO. CH~CK VAL'v~ SHIINO TYPE, LEVER I/2" OIA .. HOLE AT INVERT OF DISCHAR®E PI RAILS UPPORT DRACKET~ AT TOP AND HID-POINT TYPICAL (2) 2"¢ VENT PIPINg, SEE PLAN POR CONTINUATION 2" CONDUIT POLYPR, OPYLENE STEP5 @ 12' O.C. TO RJHP Milt, ~T'FPJ EL, 14.&' EL.: 12,15' -IN'V, EL, = 1240' .25' ELOPE EL. 11.4' BOT EL MIN. CIYPJ INV, FI. OUT: ELOPE TO PUMp NEHA 3 CONTI~)L p,NqEL ~fOUNT ON RETAININ~ MALL) POHER ~ HIRIN~ BY E.C, NOTE. REMOTE ALARM TO BE ACTIVAI~D AND CONFIC-UP-,ED A5 PER TH~ lO ETATE STANDARDS. (BEE SHEET D) IN NEHA D ENCLO~RE (HOtJNt ON RETAINING HALL) FOR CONTINUATION, DEE PLAN 25~/4"x4q~/~" H-20 LOADING COVER AND FRAME, ~ I/2" NEEHAH FOI~ORY CO,HODEL NO R-688~-KH ~ HOLE IN EACH HINGE lq/LOCKIi~ DEVICE TO C::,RADE ~ OIS(.~HA~E LINE TURN ON LAO F~JMP SlZl~ ~E MET HELL, A5 PER THE TEN STATE STANDARDS, SECTION 42.~2. ~FECTI~ VO~HE OF ~T ~LL: 45 ~H x ~ MIN =IDSO eALL~5 H~I~H 2°Y2"x2qk2'' H-20 LOADIN® COVER AND FRAME NEEHAH FOUNDRY CO., MODEL NO. R-~(282-NH HIND~ED H/LCCKING DEVICE TO GRADE FLEXIBLE COUPLIN¢ " HITHIN 4' OP MANHOLE --2" PUMP K 4'-0" MAX DIECHARGE LINED TO DISTRIE~JTION PCOL INTAKE FAN AND 2"~ PLAN FOR CONTJ EL, LO' 2" OAT6 VALV~ VALVE 5C, H 40 PIPINO Z < PA E: EINACE LIFT TATION5 (LAC,) PUMP~ LIFT STATIONS INASTtEINATEP-. PUi','IPIN® STATIONS (FROM I0 STATE STANDARDS - SECTION 42) THE FOLLOHIN¢ ITEMS SHOULD BE ¢IVEN CONSIDERATION IN THE DESIBN 42.2 5TRUE, TdRE5 42.21 SEPAF;'ATION DRY NELLB, INCLUDIN¢ THEIR 5UPERSTRUC'TdRE, SHALL BE COMPLETELY BEPARATE FROM THE ~E~T NELL. 42.22 Ed~UIPMENT REh'fOVAL PROVISIONS BHALL BE MADE TO FACILITATE REMOVIN¢ PUMPS, MOTORS AND OTHER MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL Ed~IPMENT. INDIVIDUAL PUMP AND MOTOR REMOVAL Mt.~T NOT INTERFERE INITH THE CONTINUED OEERATION OF REMAININ® PUMP5,. 42.29 ACCESS AND BAFE'I'¥ LANDINC::~ 42.291 ACCESS c'~JITABLE AND SAFE MEANS OF ACC. ESS FOR PERSONS HEARIN¢ SELF°CONTAINED BREATHIN~ APPARATdS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO MELLS, AND TO INET HELLS, 42.2,5 CONSTI~JJCTION MATERIALS MATERIALS SHALL BE SELECTED THAT APE APPROPRIATE UNDER CONDITIONS OF EXPOSUF~E TO HYDRO.~EN SULFIDE AND OTHER CORROSIVE eASES, CREASES, OILS AND OTHER OONSTITUENTS 42.D PUivlp 42.31 MULTIPLE UNITS UNITS HILL HAVE CAPACIT'( TO HANDLE THE DESISN PEAK HOUF~I..¥ FLON. 42.34 PRIMIN® THE PUMP SHALL BE 50 PLACED THAT UNDER NORMAL OPERATIN(~ CX2NDITIONS IT MILL OPEF~kTE UNDER POSITIVE SUCTION HEAD, 42.35 ELECTRICAL B2UIPMENT B2UIPMENT LOCATED IN THE HET NELL SHALL BE SUITAI~LE FOR USE UNDER CORROSIVE CONDITIONS. EACH FLEXIBLE CABLE SHALL BE OR 4. LI~H~IN~ AN~ 5UR~ P~O~OTION ~YS~M ~HOULD BE CONSIDERED. A I10 VOLT PO~R REOE~LE TO P~ILITATE MAINTE~N~E 5HALL BE PROVIDED INSIDE THE OONTROL PA~L FOR LIFT OI~OUIT IN~RRUPTION (¢~01) PRO~GTION 9HALL BE P~VIDED FOR ALL OU~OOR OUTLETS. 42.96 INTAKE EACH PUMP SHALL HAV~ AN INDIVIDUAL INTAKE. NET HELL AND INTAKE DESI~'N SHOULD BE St,ION AS TO AVOID TURBULENCE NEAR THE INTAKE AND TO PRINT VORTEX FOF~4ATION. .42.4 CONTROLS HATER LEVEL CONTROL SENSIN¢ DEVICES SHOULD BE SO LOCATED A.~ NOT TO BE UNDULY AFFECTED BY TURBULENT FLON~ ENTEF~IN¢ THE H~LL OR BY ~JRBULENT St.Y-.~TION OF THE PUMPS. 4-2.5 VALVE5 4232 DISOHARC~E LINE SUITABLE SHUTOFF AND CHECK VALVES SHALL BE PLACED ON THE DISCHAR~ LINE OF EACH PUMP. TNE CHECK. VALVE SHALL BE LOCATEE2 BETNEEN THE SHUTOFF VALVE AND THE PUMP. CHECK VALVES SHALL BE- SUITABLE FOR THE MATERIAL BEIN~ HANDLED AND SHALL BE PLACED ON THE HORIZONTAL PORTION OP THE DISCHARGE PIPIN¢ EXCEPT FOR BALL CHECKS, NHICH MAY BE PLACE IN THE VERTICAL PUN, VALVES SHALL CAPABLE OF NITNSTANDIN¢ NORMAL PRESSUPE AND HATER HAMMER. ALL SHUTOFF AND CHECK VALVE5 E~ALL BE OPERABLE FROM THE FLOOR LEVEL AND ACCESSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE. OUTSIDE LEVERS ARE RECOMMENDED ON SHINS CH~CK VALVES. 42.,6 14ET HELL5 42.62 SIZE THE DESISN FILL TIME AND MINIMUM PUMP CYCLE TIME SHALL DF coNSIDERED IN SIZIN~ THE .NET HELL. THE EFFECTIVE VOLUME OF THE NET NELL SHALL BE BASED ON THE DESIGN AVERAGE PLOH AND A FILLIN~ TIME NOT TO EXCEED 30 MINUTES. THE PUMP MANUFAC3~JRER'S DUTY CYCLE P.E. COMMENDATIONS SHALL BE UTILIZED IN SELECTION THE MINIML~M CYCLE TIME. HHEN TNE ANTICIPATED INITIAL PLOH TRIE~JTARY TO THE PUMPIN¢ STATION IS LESS THAN THE DESIGN AVERASE FLOH, PROVISIONS SHOULD BE MADE 50 THAT THE FILL TIME INDICATED IS NOT EXCEEDED FOR INITIAL PLONS. FLOOR SLOPE THE HET H'ELL FLOOR SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM SLOPE OF I TO I TO THF: HOPPER BOTTOM THE HORIZONTAL AREA OP THE HOPPER BOTTOM SHALL BE NO ~REATER THAN NECESSARY FOR PROPER INSTALLATION FUNCTION OF THE INLET. 42.&4 AIR DISPLACEPIENT COVERED HET HELL5 SHALL HAVE PROVISIONS FOR AIR DISPLACEMENT TO THE ATMOSPHERE, SUCH AS INVERTED '.J' ~JBE O~ OTHER MEANS. 42:"/ 5AFET'T' VENTILATION 42.71 ~ENERAL ADEGIUATE VENTILATION SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL PUMP 5TATIONB., NHEPE THE DRY HELL IS BELOH THE E~,ROUND SURFAOE, MECHANICAL VENTILATION IS PE~UIRED. IF 5(..REENS OR MECHANICAL EGIUIPMENT REGUtRIN¢ MAINTENANCE OR INSPECTION ARE LOCATED' IN THE HET HELL, PERMANENTLY INSTALLED VENTILATION IS REd~UIR. ED. THERE SHALL BE NO INTERCONNECTION ~TP,~EN THE HET HELL AND DRY HELL VENTILATION SYSTEMS. INASTEINA b:t< PUI"4PIN( STATIONS CONTINUED 42.-/9 ELECTRICAL CONTROLS THE MANUAL LIGHTINSNENTILATION SHITC. H SHALL OVERRIDE THE AUTOMATIC CONTROLD. FOR A THO 5PEED VENTILATION SYSTEM HITN AUTOMATIC SMITCH OVER NHERE SAS DETECTION EG~UIPMENT IS INBTALLED, OONSIDERATION BHOULD* BE ¢IVEN TO INCREASIN~ THE VENTILATION RAT~ AUTOMATICALLY Itl RESPONBE TO THE DETECTION OP DRY HELL VENTILATION MAY BE EITHER CONTINIX:)US OR INTERMITTENT. 42.~, FLOH MEA~PEMENT ~ITABLE DEV1CE~ FOR MEASURIN® HA~TEHATER FLOH SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL PUMPIN¢ STATIONS, ELAPSED TIME METERS t~2ED IN OON~TION MITH AN~AL PUMPIN¢ ~TE T~T~ HA~ ~E ACCEPTABLE POR ~MP STATION5 Hl~ A DESICN P~K ~U~L~ PLOH UP TO 1200 ~D ~) PROVIDE~ GUFFICIENT HE~IN~ I~ CONFI~D TO MEASURE THE ~U~TION OF INDIVIDUAL AND DIHULTANEO~ ~HP O~TION. 42.q HA~ ~JPPLY THE~ 5HALL DE NO PHYSIO~ OONNEOTION BET~EN AN~ POTABL~ ~R ~PPLT AND A NA¢~R ~HPIN¢ STATION NHIOH UNDER AN~ CONPlTION5 MI~HT CAUSE OONTAMINATION OF THE POTABLE 5UPPLY. I~A POTABLE ~TER SUPPLY I~ B~OU~HT TO THE STATION, IT GHALL OOMPL~ MITH THE ~NDITION5 5TIlLAgE UNDER PUMP STATIONS SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS (FROM I0 STATE STANDARDS) 44. SUBMERSIBLE PUMP STATION GHALL MEET THE APPLICABLE PEd~UIREMENTS UNDER SECTION 42, EXCEPT AS MODIFIED IN THIS BECTION, 44.1 CONSTRUCTION, 51)[~MERSIBLE PUMF~ ON MOTOR5 SHALL B~E DESISNED SPECIFICALLY FOR RAN HABTEHATER USE, INCLUDIN~ TOTALLY SUBMEF~EID OPERATION 44.2. PUMP REMOVAL, SUBMERSIBLE PUMF~ SHALL BE READILY PEMOVA~LE AND R~PLACEABLE HITHOUT PERSONNEL ENTERIN~ OR DEMATERIN¢ THE MET HELL, OR DISCONNECTIN~ ANY PIPIN(D IN THE MET HELL. 44.3 ELECTRICAL Ed~UIPMENT, 44.31 POHER SUPPLY AND CONTROL CIRCUITRY - ELECTRICAL SUPPLY, CONTROL AND ALARM CIRCUITO SHALL DESISNED TO PROVIDE STRAIN RELIEF AND TO ALLOH DISOONNECTION FROM OUTSIDE THE HET HELL OR THROUSH LJSE OP HATEI~.TISHT 44.32 CONTROLS - THE MOTOR CONTROL CENTER SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE NET HELL, tEE READILY ASSESSABLE, AND BE P~C~D DY A OONDUIT SEAL O~ OT~R APPrOPrIATE M~E5 MEETIN¢ THE ~UI~MENT5 OF THE NATIO~ ELECTRIC OODE, TO P~T THE A~PHE~ OF THE MET HELL F~OM SAININ¢ AOOE~ TO THE CONTROL OEN~. THE ~E~ 5HALL BE ~ LOOATED THAT THE MOTO~ MAT ~E ~EMOVEP AND ELECTRICA~Y DI~ONNEOTED HITHOUT PlST~BIN~ THE 5E~. HHEN ~CH E~UI~ENT I¢ EXP~ED TO HEATHE~, IT 5HALL HEET THE ~UI~H~NT5 OF ~THDRP~OF E~UIPHENT ~MA DR O~ 4. ALARH ST'STEMS THESE DRAHIN55 AND ACCOMPANYING SPECIFICATIONS, A5 INSTPJJHENT5 OF SERVICE, ARE THE EXOLLISIV~ PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND THEIR US~ AND F1JBLIGATION 5HALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE O~RIGINAL SiTE FOR N41OH THE'" HERE PREPARED, REUSE, REPROPlJOTIOH OR R)DLIC, AEION BY ANT HETHOD, IN .NHOLE OR IN PART, 15 PP. OHIDITED EXCEPT BY ,NAITTEN PERHI5510N FROH THE ARCHITECT, TITLE TO THESE PLAN5 5btALL REHAIN NITH THE AROHITEOTVISUAL CONTACT HITH THEH 5HALL OONSTIIUTE PRIHA FAOIE EVIDEHCE OP ACCEPTANCE OF THESE RESTRICTION5 FLOW SITE PLAN OF MATT-A-MAR BY THE BAY,,, LLC. SITUATE AT NEW SUFFOLK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK LOVE LANE ACQUISION CORP KING STREET N/O/F NEW SUFFOLK FISHING STATION 5 ...-.-.~....-.-.-- -.- ·. - -. - -.....:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~:i:-:.:-~:-:-:-:"' '"' ':'" "' "'" .- j- ] FLOW #7 #8 .-.-. -...- .. ~ ~6 ~ / "' ' FLOW 2PARKING SPACES EXISTING SHOP KESTA,URANT < < FLOW SCTM: 1000-117-8-18 SCALE: 1 "=20' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EXISTING SPLIT RAIL FENCE EXISTING SPLIT RAiL FENCE MAIN STREET EXISTING CH2klN LINK FENCE 5 PAKKING SPACES EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCi FLOW FLOW FLOW FLOW < ~,cmq: FLOW FLOV, < AREA TO BE LAND BANKFD FOR ADDITIONAL pARKING I FLOW FLOW FLOW Fl ,O~L_ FLOW BASra / FLOW FLOW / FLOW h N/O/F SOUTHOLD DEVELOPMENT C()ILP. 3 4 5 7 NO ADDITIONAL LIGHTING IS PROPOSED "11 SITE MAP SCALE: 1"=600' P ALI4_IN G CALCULATIONS: l 7 BOAT RACKS ~ 9 BOATS PER RACK = 153 BOATS 153 BOATS = 153 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 10 BCAT SLIPS ~ 1 BOAT PER SLiP = 10 BOATS 10 BOATS = 10 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED BOA: SHOP = 1389 SQ. FT. = 6 SPACES I SPACE PER 250 SQ. FT. 1569: Q. FT. RESTAURANT = 16 SPACES ~ SPACE PER 100 SQ, FT. TO'r.~ SPAC':S REQUIRED = 185 '?ACFS PARI:/NG SPACES PROVIDED UNDER BOAT RACKS = 45 SPACES OPEN SPACES = 32 SPACES + 2 HANDICAP OPEH SPACES (LOT #2)= 106 SPACES TOTAL PARKLNG SPOTS PROVIDED = ,183 + 2 HANDICAI~ (61'PARKING SPACES ARE PROPOSED TO BE IN LAND BANKED AREA) LOT COVERAGE CRITERIA: TO7AL LOT SIZE (ABOVE,,~dHW) = 128,173 sq. R. TOTAL BUILDING ARE,~% 2,533 sq. ft. or 2% Existing Storage Building = 593 sq. B. Ixisting Restaur.afft & Ramps = 1,940 sq. fl. l~arking Lot ~To'(al Area = 88,216 sq. ff. --TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA = 37,424 sq. ft. or 29.2% (128,173 sq. ff. - 90,749 sq. ft.) (FULLY DEVELOPED PAI~N/G AREAS) NORTH PARKING~EOT AREA DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS: _RAJNFXLL = 2" / HR RU3I OFF' FACTOR - GRAVEL 0.50 ASSUME 10'-0" DIA. x-Y~" HIGH POOL 205.3 CU.FT. V0,,~ME (CU.FT.) = (P~ INFALL)(AREA)(RUN OFF FACTOR) Z(,I-67)(51,343 SQ. FT.)(0.50) _---- =4,287.14 CU.FT ------'" = # O~OOLS = 4,288 / 205.3 = 20.89 = 21 POOLS SOUTH. P)~i~2ING%OT AREA DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS RAINFALL RU,4 OFF FACTOR - GILAVEL 0.50 p;-'I%,m~ *cp.(v, ~A v 3"-0" NIGH pc)ar 2~c ~ Gl'VT VDLUME (CU.FT.) = (ILAINFALL)(AREA)(RUN OFF FACTOR) = (.167)(13,828 SQ. FT.)(0.50) = 1,154.64 CU.FT = # OF POOLS = 1,155 / 205.3 = 5.63 = 6 POOLS SOUTH PARKING LOT AREA (LAND BANKED AREA) DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS: RAINFALL = 2" / HR RUN OFF FACTOR - GRAVEL 0.50 ASSUME 10'-0" DIA. x Y-0" HIGH POOL 205.3 CU.FT. VOLUME (CU.FT.) = (RA1NFALL)(AREA)(RLTN OFF FACTOR) = (.167)(23,045 SQ. FT.)(0.50) = 1,924.26 CU.FT = # OF POOLS = 1,924.26 / 205.3 = 9.38 = 10 POOLS VERIFY ALL EXIST1NG DRAINAGE & SEPTIC LOCATIONS. ACTUAL DRkAINAGE LOCATIONS AND CONFIGURATIONS MAY VARY BASED ON LOCATION OF, EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM, AND LOCATION AND CONDITION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE DKAINAGE, ',X14 8 /t' MINIMUM CAST IRON FRAME & GRATE 3AMPBELL FOUNDRY COVER 2" WEAR COURSE TO BE PITCHED 'TOWARDS DRAIN COVER. ~' MINIMUM D / G,RAVEL ¢ / LEACHING 3'-0" TO GROUND WATER BASIN DETAIL ~,IFE PLAN INFORMATION IS BASED ON LAND SURVEY PREPARED BY WALLACE T. BRYAN - L1SCENCED LAND SURVEYOR IOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION IS BASED ON PLAN PREPARED BY HOLZMACHER, MCLENDON & MURRELL, P.C. I pROdECT NO: 784-200 1 CMA 1"-- 20' 01- 18-04 03-05-04 11-30-04 PARKING DRAINAGE LOT COVERAGE SITE PLAN lofl SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITUA TED A T NEW SUFFOLK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK S.C. TAX No. 1000-117-08-18 SCALE 1"=30' JULY 6, 2005 NOVEMBER 19, 2005 ADDED AREA OF NEW YORK STATE LAND GRANT KING MAIN STREET NEE 1 ~$ 83'47'30" E N 83'45'00" -S 83' 45'00" TAX No. 1000-117--8-18 AREA = 149,`324.97 sq. ff. (TO TIE LINE 3.428 ac. ~ BULKHEAD) TOTAL NEW YORK STATE LAND GRANT AREA = 105,000.00 sq. fl, 2.410 NEW YORK STATE LAND GRANT LESS = 93,174,69 sq. fi. P/O S.C. TAX NO. 1000-117--8-18 AREA 2,1.39 oc, TOTAL NEW YORK STATE LAND GRANT AND = 242,499.66 sq. ff. S.C. TAX No. 1000-117--8-18 AREA 5.567 oc. 138.22' S 85'29'29" E 113.47' ~ W 192.94' 193.50' 83'05'30" W 204.43' :,1 £ S S 29"07'10" E 55.!I' S 81'15'12" E 91.88' 62,60' E N 88" 43'33" W 1762 NOTES 1. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE EXISTING CONTOUR LINES , n FIRST FLOOR ~, GARAGE FLOOR 1, fOP OF BULKHEAD TO N,G.V.D. 1929 DATUM SHOWN THUS::: ARE SHOWN THUS: TEST HOLE BI ELD' ~EST HOL~r 82 NY,S Lic No 49668 A. Ingegno Surveyor PHONE (651)727-2090 F~x (631)727 1727 gS-18P: KING STREET N/OfF NEW SUFFOLK FISHING STATION MAP OF PROPERTY MATT-A-MAR BY THE BAY, LLC. SITUATE AT NEW SUFFOLK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK LOVE LANE ACQUISION CORP. SCTM: 1000-117-8-18 SCALE: 1"=40' } I I MAIN STREET I N/O/F SOUTHOLD DEVELOPMENT CORP. COLOR LEGEND TOPOGRAPh'ICAL LEGEND PROJECT NO: 784-2001 CMA 10-27-03 1" = 40' PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN lofl NO. LEVEL 3 3 BOATS 8,000# EA. LEVEL a 3 BOATS I~ la,500# EA, LEVEL ! 3 BOATS 15,000~ EA, 30,_6, 30'-6' 30'-6' -- 30'-6' 30'-6'-- 30'-6~ 14'-6" P -- 30'-6' 30'-6' PLAN VIEW (TYPICAL EACH ROW) P 7'-0' I~PEN 30'-6' AUTOMOBILE PARKING 30'-6'-- P 30'-6" · FRONT ELEVATION (TYPICAL EACH ROW) TWO ROWS OF RACKS DESIGNED WITH THE FIRST LEVEL OPEN FOR AUTOHBBILE PARKING -. ' --I 14'-6" SECT~nN 34'-0" DETAIL 3 DIAGnNAL CENTER CONNECTION DETAIL 2 FRAME BRACE DETAIL Z © 3 o 0 o Drawn By Date DH 11-!0-03 Scale NTS Sheet Drawing Number 031160 Dave & Bill Roof... "When it comes to Dry Storage.... our advanced knowledge and years of construction experience .... unquestionably makes us the Leader in RG YARD STANDS RG/RP ~ERIES PORTABLE FREE ROOF ONLY 3 SIDED GABLED A 30'-6' 30'-6' 30'-6' 30'-6' ~n'-~- 30'-6' PLAN VIEW (TYPICAL EACH ROW) LEVEL 3 3 BEATS 8,000# EA. LEVEL ;~ 3 ]~OATS Q 12,500# EA, LEVEL 1 3 BOATS ]5,000# EA. P P P P P P P 30'-6' P 30'-6' P P 30'-6' P 30'-6' PARKING 30'-6' P P 30'-6' FRONT ELEVATION (TYPICAL EACH ROW) TWO ROWS OF RACKS DESIGNED WITH THE FIRST LEVEL OPEN F0R AUTOMOBILE PARKING 34'-0' ---~ 14'-6' I SECTIDN A-A DETAIL 3 DETAIL 2 I 34'-0' 1 DETAIL 3 DIAC~I]NAL CENTER CONNECTION DETAIL 2 FRAME BRACE DETAIL HORIZONTAL Wi4 SHELF' BEAH W14 SHELF BEAM Revision No. I ~ Drawn By DH Date 11-10-03 Scale NTB Sheet 1 ~ Drawing Number Revision No. A 30'-6' 30'-6' 30'-6' 30'-~' qn'-~- --'-- 30'-6' PLAN VIEW (TYPICAL EACH ROW) LEVEL 3 8,000# EA, LEVEL 2 3 BOATS @ 12,500# EA. LEVEL 1 3 BOATS @ 15,000# EA, PE~ SP~C~CAT~NS A~ GUOTED, DO NOT OVERLOA~ SYSTEM, ~ ~D]LY INJJ~Y A,NBXE]R PROPERTy D~HAGE COULD RESULT. , t I / F P p P p P P 30'-6'- 30'-6' 30'-6' 30'-6' 30'-6' 30'-6' - FRONT ELEVATION (TYPICAL EACH Rnw) TWO ROWS OF RACKS DESIGNED WITH THE FIRST LEVEL OPEN FOR AUTOMOBILE PARKING 14'-6' I 34'-0' ~ 14'-6' I SECTION A-A -DETAIL 3 DETAIL 2 34'-0' DETAIL 3 DIAGONAL CENTER CONNECTION DETAIL 2 FRAME BRACE ]DETAIL PART NO, PARTS LIST DESCRIPTION W6 COLUMN HORIZONTAL 3 DIAGONAL 4 W14 SHELF BEAM HVY 5 6 7 TIMBER CLAMPS W14 SHELF BEAM HVY Wi4 SHELF BEAM LT. 34'-0" ] 36 14'-6' ~ 72 1 ! 30'-0'i 30 i ~o'-o'] so j so'-o'.i so J Drawn By DH Date 11_10_03 Scale NTS Sheet 1 Drawing Number r LEVEL 3 3 BOATS 8 8,000# EA. LEVEL 2 3 BOATS 8 12,500# EA. LEVEL ! 3 BOATS 15,000# EA. NDTE~ RACKS TO DE LOADED PER SPECIFICATIONS AS QUOTED, DO NOT OVERLOAD SYSTEN. SERIOUS BODILY INJURY AND/DR PROPERTY DAMAGE COULD RESULT· 38'-6' 311'-6' ~8'-6' 30'-6' 30'-6'-- 30'-6" PLAN VIEW (TYPICAL EACH RI]W) -- 30'-6' ' 30'-6' t 7'-0' qPEN 30'-6' 30'-6' -p AUTOMOBILE PARKING 30'-6'--- 30'-6' FRONT ELEVATION (TYPICAL EACH ROW) TWO ROWS DF RACKS DESIGNED WITH THE FIRST LEVEL OPEN FOR AUTBHDBILE PARKING 14'-6' 34'-0' --I 14'-6' i-- SECTION A-A ~DETAIL 3 TDE~AIL 34'-0' DETAIL 3 DIAGONAL CENTER CONNECTION DETAIL P FRAME BRACE DETAIL 'w'i4 SHELF ~'-~,' - ' ¢/,, ~, SHELF H',/Y .... Revision No. Drawn By DH Date 11-10-03 Scale NTS Sheet Drawing Number ho31160 A 30'-6' -- LEVEL 3 3 3BATS I~ 8,000~ EA. LEVEL ~ 3 BOATS @ 12,500~ EA, LEVEL 1 3 BOATS ~ 15,000# EA, - 30'-6' ' NOTE, RACKS TO BE LOADED PER SPECIFICATIONS AS QUOTED. -- 30'-6' -- -- 30'-6' 30'-6' - L - 30'-6' PLAN VIE~/ (TYPICAL EACH ROW) 7'-0' _ - - 30'-6' -- FRONT ELEVATION (TYPICAL EACH ROW) TWO ROWS OF RACKS DESIGNED WITH THE FIRST LEVEL OPEN FOR AUTOMOBILE PARKING - 30'-6'- AUTOMOBILE PARKING - - 30'-6'-- 14'-6" 30'-6--~ ~ -- 30'-6' 34'-0' /DETAIL ¢, H SECTION A-A I ,--, 0 ~0 DETAIL 3 ~ ~ DIAGONAL CENTER CONNECTION ~ ~ o FRAME BRACE DETAIL ~ ~ The New Suffolk Waterfront Committee PO Box 336, New Suffolk, NY 11956 Ms JerilynWoodhouse ~ Jun~"!!~ Chairwoman, Southold Town Planning Board i ~ /~ // ~1 I~ J/\\~ POBox 1179 \\ ~..~ Southold, V 11971 Application #1-4738-0108/00009 Dear Ms Woodhouse and Members of the Planning Board, In our lettar of June 3 regarding Matt-a-Mar' s request for a non.j~i~t~e"~i~C~rmination with respect to Health Department approval for a replacement septic systeTM, We failed to mention our concern over increases in seating capacity that could arise from the expanded decking around the site's restaurant. As you are aware, Mat-a-Mar's application for the repair and maintenance of existing bulkheads and walkways includes a request for additional decking. The location of this decking was not specified. We are concerned that the decking could be used for additional seating, and that this could result in an increase in both the number of seats in the restaurant and the number of employees working on the site. We would like to raise a number of questions: · Has the Planning Board asked the applicant what the restaurants seating capacity will be after the repairs and new decking are completed7 · Has the Planning Board seen drawings showing where the proposed additional decking will be located? · Will seating capacity be increased beyond what is currently authorized? If the Planning Board finds that there is an increase in the restaurant's seating capacity, we suggest that the applicant's request for a determination of non-jurisdiction be denied. Any increase in seating capacity and septic capacity should be reviewed as part of the larger project. Sincerely, Diana Schwatka, President, on behalf of the Committee Cc: Scott Russell, Supervisor Members of the Town Board Patricia Finnegan, Town Attorney Mark Carrera, NYS DEC Region 1 Deputy Permit Administrator Steven Resler, Coastal Resources Division, NYS Dept of State Stevan Ridler, Coastal Resources Division, NYS Dept of State Walter Hilbert, Suffolk County Health Dept, Division of Wastewatar Management Jetilya B. Woodhottqe, Chairperson Town of Southold Planning Board Southold, NY 11971 PRGE1 17130 Main Street Matt-a-Mar by~l~y ........... Appii~fi0h.~~~ Appli~ti~g20i 08/00~9 Dmr Ms. Woodhouse: At its May 30 Work Session, the Planning Board considered Matt-a-Mar by tile Bayg request for a Non-Jurisdiction determination with respect to i~ request for llealth Depattmem approval for a rcplaccment of an existing septic sys'~'m for thc restaurant onlZ This application has lx:en portrayed by the applicant as an separate action separate from both the Bulkhead Repair project and the Boat Rack Storage project. We ate concerned that this request may be an attempt to set!merit the larger Boat I~u,-k Storag~ project in terms of SEQICtt review. As you are well aware, the Boat Rack Storage project is currently under a coordinated SEQRA review by the Town and thc State. It is noteworthy that the site plan for this project does not include se~ate lavatory facilities for the pmpo~d expansion of the marina operation. Yet this marina will require a staffto malnlain (wash and sex,Ace) the boats, and to move them in and oul of the water on demand. Up to 153 boats are proposed to be stored on the racks and l 0 boats are to be docked at in-water slips, On a busy summer weekend, the staff, boat owners and their guests wiU be on the site and wiU need access to rest facilitu:s. If the use of *.he existing facilities will be restricted to restaurant patrons, as suggested by thi~ applicant, is i: realistic to expect that this can (and will) be enfr~re.ezl either by the proprietor of the restaurant or by the Town or Health Department? It is our undemtanding that the restaurant pr*mi~s will be leased fi, om tt~ owner of the pn~.xty on which it stan&. The restaurant fronts on the Peconie Bay National F~tuary, and protection of tis wat~ quaht¥ requires a careful look at potential loading of ~oge~ and other pollutanl~ thal may be introduct, d b~ septic sy~ems. If the Plaxming Board issues a Non-Jurisdiction le~er, will it requite the applicant to amend the Bom Rack Storage application to include additional lavatory facilities? The New Suffolk Wa~rfmnt Committee suggests that thc Planning l~)ard ~s~ablish a di~k)gue with the Del:~ent of t~alth at,d, ~urt,h~, rt~lU~t a e.o~)y of the ~pplieation in front of it. in order to assess more elo~ly the significance of Ibis request for Non- Iurisdicdon. Sinccrcly, .~ ~ Michael A. Simon For the New Suffolk Waterfix)nt Comminee Cc: NYSDEC NY Depamnent of'State ~ Ilealth I)eparUnent [11 May 3, 2006 Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chairwoman Southold Town Planning Board PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Woodhouse, It is my understanding that there is to be a meeting ': ......... of the SouthWard Town Pi~t~ring~Board on Monday, May 8th at which the Matt-A-Mar on the Bay's original LLC Application is to be reviewed and the next steps by your Board decided. It is my hope, and that of the New Suffolk Civic Association, that the Southold Town Planning Board issues a Positive Declaration for the Matt-A-Mar on the Bay project. As you know from previous letters written on this subject, the members of the Civic Association and the Community at Large feel are strongly against the plans of Matt-A- Mar on the Bay to create a High and Dry Boat Storage facility for 117 boats and parking for over 200 cars on the historical News Suffolk Waterfront. It is our hope that the issuance of a positive declaration resulting in a full State Environmental Quality Review Act and the preparation of a full environmental impact state~nent, will assist us in our on- going efforts to eventually purchase this land and create a public-private park for all to enjoy. Anything that can be done by you and the members of the Planning Board in curtailing the commemial development of this parcel would be most appreciated. It is also our hope that the Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan will be utilized in helping the NSCA, The NS Waterfront Committee and the residents of New Suffolk in preserving this historical waterfront. Many thanks for all of your time. Sincere~13t~ '"x ~ Lauren K. Grant, President NEW SUFFOLK CIVIC ASSOCIATION, INC. POST OFFICE BOX 642 NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 May 2, 2006 Ms. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairwoman And Members of the Planning Board Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Matt-a-Mar on the Bay 117-8-18 SEQRA determination Dear Ms. Woodhouse: With regard to the projected decision of the Planning Board May 8, 2006, on the SEQRA determination for the Matt-a-Mar property in New Suffolk: there are many reasons for a positive declaration. However, in our view, the most compelling and determining reason is that we (New Suffolk and Southold Town) need to know, once and for all, the nature and degree of contamination on that propetty before another spade is turned for any purpose. After over 160 years of deposits of coal, oils, tar, kerosene, gasoline, copper, solvents - and who knows how many other elements and chemicals - the property is a repository of suspected contamination. Please issue a positive SEQRA declaration for a full environmental review. Thank you for your attention and your patience. Sincerely, Joan B. Robbins Newton Robbins 16995 Main Street P. O. Box 147 New Suffolk, NY 11956 Cc: Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Board Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board of Trustees ~aarSDEC - Stony Brook k Terry, Southold Town Planning Department Ms. ]erilyn Woodhouse Members of the Plannlm Southold Planning Board Southold Town Hall P 0 Box 1179 Soul:hold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Woodhouse and Hembers of the Planning Board, We would like to voice our views concerning the project proposed by Mat-A-Nar By the Bay's application in New Suffolk. We in New Suffolk are strongly opposed to the project as presented at this time. This charming, historic waterfront will disappear if Nat-A-Har is permitted to go forward as they have requested to do. Not only will we all lose the natural beauty of a place that has great historic value but we will effect other waterfront areas in the future by allowing this to happen here. Please consider all the following Issues carefully and help us to create an environment that we will all be proud of in our hamlet. Allowing one company to destroy such a naturally beautiful area will truly be shameful. We have noted here a few points of concern. A more detailed list is available from The New Suffolk Waterfront Committee which we support strongly. + Has anyone investigated the increased traffic to narrow streets in this area and thought about the impact on a small local school house? + We have questions relating to garbage and recycling. Who will be responsible for these duties? +Racks three stories high will mar the beauty of the area..lust look at Port of Egypt and see the ugliness. +What about sanitary facilities for the Increased number of people using the facilities? The proposed plan does not show any accommodations for this. +What about the "pump out arrangements for the increased number of boats? We have a boat and know first hand the importance of keeping the waters clean. +Does the project conform to our Waterfront Revitalization Program? +Pollutio~ of the neighborhood with noise, odors especially from the boat lift operation and large trailers transporting boats up these narrow streets. +Impact on our shoreline and ~ogue Harbor. You know this will Increase the number of boats on the water. +Possible pollution of the water in this area. We are aware that this area was establish long ago to be a marina. We do not object to that. Our objections are that it appears to us that no consideration has been given to make this marina a thing of beauty, an area that will preserve the history of this hamlet, a safe environmen_t~l ~!~ and an place that those who reside in Southold will be proud of. ~.~;.~ ~'~:'~' '~ ~ P ease carefully consider all phases of the Impact on this a~nd help us save o~u£ ~.--~ ' May 2, 2006 Ms. Jedly~ B. Woodhouse Chairwoman Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southotd, NY 11971 I would like to take this opportunity to comment on the continuing application by Matt.A-Mar on the Bay to build boat recks in New Suffolk. The scope and height of the project dearly do not conf(xm to the surrounding Hamlet Center of New Suffolk. As you complete your review it is critical that a positive SEQUA declaration be made for the project. The history of the site regarding its use and previous projects proposed deady indicate a positive declaration to be in om~. Them is a long ~ of possible contamination which must be addressed. The adoption of the LWRP requires that its requirements of review be followed. This will be one of the initial utilization of the LWRP in ~ town and will be the acid test of its atfoctiveness. The designation of the entire North Fork as a scenic vista needs to be enforced by denying the scar which will be placed on the landscape end scenic vista in New Suffolk forever. A summary of the masons to deny this project am as follows: 1) The pmject is not consiatent with the character of the naghbon'xx3d. The height will dwarf all surrounding structures and disrupt the scenic vistas. 2) The 19 recom~ and significant adverse impacts and recommendations for additional information identified by Nelson, Pope & Voonhis, LLC in their Environmental Assessment Review prepared for the Planning Department and ignored by ~ applicant 3) The significance of the LVVRP and its specific comments regarding the site. 4) The April 25, 2005 Memo to the Planning Board from the Trustee's regarding their 15 concerns regarding the application. 5) The vision of the Stakeholders rpport regarding the site and the Hamlet Conter. 6) The actions and attitude of Michael Raynor towards the residents of New Suffolk with his blocks containing waste materials around the site further demonstrates his arrogance to the community arid his potential to ~ deseu a;e the Hamlet Center. I strongly believe that a positive SEQUA declaration will identify all of the reasons that this project should not be pem3itted. Si ely, 4370 New Suffolk Road Post Office Box 261 New Suffolk, NY 11956 May 1, 2006 Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chairwoman And Members of the Planning Board Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Woodhouse, Thank you for acknowledging my prior letter to you requesting a denial of the proposed installation by Matt-a-Mar of boat racks in New Suffolk. I am writing again in regard to this matter and am urgently requesting that the Planning Board issue a Positive Declaration for the proposed project. I understand that this type of Declaration will result in the need for the preparation of a full environmental impact statement. As sited in the July 6, 2005 NP & V report, a number of issues have not been addressed by Matt-a-Mar: 1) Property has great historical value since it is the site of the first submarine base. 2) Potential adverse impacts to Cutchogue Harbor water quality due to the increased number of boats 3) Height of the boat storage buildings and the potential impact on the watershed views of the harbor 4) How will the pump out facilities be handled and will fuel storage be provided? 5) Potential adverse impact to Cutchogue Harbor water quality due to the number of boats 6) Does this project conform to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? Lastly, the increased traffic flow will create a significant safety factor and reduced quality of life for residents in the hamlet. Even without this installation, drivers ignore the speed limits and often drive at hazardous speeds. And, the constant flow of cars and tracks that the facility will bring will ultimately lessen the value of the homes in the area. Rose Ann Bums LUCILLE FIELD GOODMAN PO Box 639 New Suffolk, New York 11956 May 3, 2006 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chair Southold Town Planning Board Members Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Board members: I have owned and lived in a home in New Suffolk for almost twenty-seven years, and am an active member of the New Suffolk Civic Association. Many of us are deeply concerned about the building of boat storage racks by Matt-a-Mar on the Bay in the New Suffolk boat basin area. We hope you will issue a Positive Declaration that will result in a full SEQRA, and the preparation of a full environmental impact statement. We are asking that you consider the damage and destruction to the peace, safety and beauty of our little hamlet by the following: The scale of the project - too many boats and too many cars, 153 boats and 185 parking slots; The impact of so many boats on the water quality of the Bay; The height of the racks (35 feet) which would loom over the surrounding properties; The unsightliness and obstruction of views, not only to New Suffolkers, but to the many visitors to the hamlet and its public beach and boating facilities; The effect on parking for Legends, shops, post office, etc. and on local streets; The proposed demolition of the last original building (the historic barn) on site; The prevention of eventual reconstruction of the General Store & Post Office; Inadequate restrooms and pump-out facilities; The safety and well-being of our children and seniors. We know you are dedicated to the preservation, history, and protection of our unique hamlet, and will give your thoughtful attention to our concerns. Sincerely, Lucille Field Goodman Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse And Members of the Planning Board Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 &T Dear Ms. Woodhouse and Members of the Planning Board My husband and I live in New Suffolk and have owned a home on the comer of Main and 2nd Streets for 14 years. We purchased our home because we love the charm and community spirit of the hamlet. The people of New Suffolk are very aware of our bay and the impact that our lifestyle has on its fragile ecosystem. We are also very proud of the historic value of New Suffolk as the first submarine base on L.I.. We are extremely concerned regarding the proposed Matt-a-Mar on the Bay Marina. New Suffolk is a small community and the proposed marina disregards the fragility of the surrounding waters and the history of the hamlet of New Suffolk. We hate to imagine what 17 metal structures, 34 feet high, built at the waters edge of this small community would do to. vilify [he beauty of our hamlet. We are appalled at the total lack of foresight and regard for community that the Matt-a-Mar proposal allows. This plan has no accommodations for rest rooms for boat owners or pump out facilities. We fear the destructive impact on the pristine waters of the bay with that many boats discharging waste and fuel. Putting in tall metal boat rack structures will completely alter and destroy the views particularly along First Street. What an eyesore! Demolishing an historic barn in order to place ugly metal structures is thoughtless. The racks are too high, the number of boats and the lack of parking are all unacceptable as the plan now appears. We hope to replace our historic General Store/Post Office building on it's original site. This Marina plan prevents that. Simply put, this project is without thought or regard for lifestyle of a small historic hamlet. Main Street and the surrounding streets are already under traffic stress because of a very popular restaurant/bar: Legends. New Suffolk also has a public beach area that adds a parking nightmare for the local residents who have to deal with ongoing illegal parking during the summer season. As it appears now, this proposed marina project will create absolute chaos for the existing peaceful, charming and historic village already pushed to the limits of patience with traffic issues and our concern for the baY and the wildlife who depend on the bay for survival. The proposal of the marina as it now stands is so incredibly unacceptable ~at we will not tolerate it being regarded as anything other than folly. This is a ridiculous idea for New Suffolk. As a New Suffolk homeowner and Southold taxpayer we are asking you to take a critical and compassionate view of the impact the proposed marina will have on the environment of New Suffolk and its residents. Please keep us informed of town meetings and any developments regarding this project as we will appreciate opportunities to share our concerils. The idea of obliterating the views in our hamlet and the impact on the bay for profit are so appalling that we are willing to do whatever is nec08sary to force Matt-a-Mar to accept responsibility to the environment and to the community. We hope that the members of the Southold Town Planning Board look closely at who and what will be impacted by this proposed plan. As it stands it is unacceptable. Sincerely, Andrew & Jacque Uterano 17095 Main Street PO Box 435 New Suffolk, NY 11956 May 1, 2006 Dear Ms. Woodhouse, As concerned residents of New Suffolk we would like to bring to the attention of the Planning Board that the proposed marina will disturb the waterfront area and we require that appropriate tests are done to insure that old and hidden contaminants are not revitalized which would pollute and contaminate the entire area of beach, fishing, and swimming areas. This is our number one concern. There is also no way to predict the impact of the number of cars, traffic, and human waste which will be brought on this area. All these considerations must be accounted for. Without this, the effects can be catastrophic for our small community with only a few profiting from increased income which will threaten to ruin the other's enjoyment and appreciation of this historic and peaceful area. We trust that the Town and the individuals proposing this project, are responsible to these concerns and will guarantee that all of our concerns are considered will not allow profit to destroy the environment and life quality of those who inhabit the area. .(3% Gil and Ellen Gold~ein 965 Second St. New- Suffolk, NY 11956 Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse Chairman, Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 May 1 st, 2006 Dear Ms Woodhouse, My husband and I have been residents of New Suffolk for over 32 years. We are convinced that our hamlet is one of the most beautiful places in the entire world. At a time where we have to be vigilant over so much destruction of our beautiful land, the marina waterfront project on First Street is of great concern to us for the following reasons: This project is too large involving too many boats and too many cars for such a small area. The quality of the water in the bay would be affected and a great risk for our children and all the people using the New Suffolk beach. More and more, our public beach attracts people from many towns around and the parking is already a major issue. 3. The racks are too high and would destroy the neighborhood. Where would the patrons of the restaurant Legends park their cars and this narrow part of New Suffolk would be "suffocating" with parking and heavy traffic on Main street, which is a dead end street! 5. The proposed landscape seems very insufficient for such a beautiful area. It seems that the plans show no accommodation for rest rooms for boat owners and no pump-out. This is a crucial time for the North Fork. It is time for our Town Board to be extremely vigilant and prevent man made disasters that would have such a destructive impact on our environment and our historical village. New Suffolk is so much part of the History of the North Fork. We trust our Town Board to make sure that the right thing is done for the Hamlet. Respectfully, Mich~lle Roussan Matei Roussan. M.D. 865 2nd street / PO Box 245 New Suffolk NY 11956 mroussan~earthlink.net THE NEW SUFFOLK WATERFRONT COMMITTEE JilqL- - POBOX336, NEWi~ SUFFOLK,NY 11956 Ms Jerilyn Woodhouse Chairwoman, Southold Town Planning Board PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 MA¥-I 2006 Dear Ms Woodhouse and Members of the Planning Board, In light of the upcoming SEQRA decision which the Planning Board will make regarding Mat-A- Mar By the Bay LLC's application # 4738-.01008/00008, the New Suffolk Waterfront Committee would like to reiterate its concerns regarding this project and emphasize that a full environmental review is not only what many New Suffolk residents desire, but what they believe is mandated by the scope and scale of the Mat-A-Mar proposal. Clearly, the failure to date on the part of the applicant to provide a response to the July 2005 NP&V report, indicates that the points raised by NP&V are not only difficult to address, but we would suggest impossible to respond to adequately without a more comprehensive environmental study. A positive SEQRA Declaration from the Planning Board at this time would insure that the questions raised by the NP&V nearly one year ago, can finally be addressed. The Southold Town Hamlet Study describes New Suffolk as "Southold's only waterfront hamlet centgr" with a "uniaue and historic association with the Peconic Bay". The LWRP has identified the property as one of Southold's underutilized sites and has recommended redevelopment which "seeks to maintain the marine-related character of the New Suffolk waterfront, but at a scale appropriate to the C ,ommlmlty.' They go on to say, "The high de~ree of environmental semitivitv not to mention the unioue historic character of the New Suffolk area. in Reneral. hie. hlimhts the need for careful and limited redevelopment." There is also, as you know from the site's long history of proposed and then abandoned redevelopment projects, a question of possible contamination on the site, which has still to be resolved. It is clearly referred to in the LWRP where references are made to the "use of Brownfieid Grants to pay for environmental clean up of the site prior to redevelopment." Again, a positive SEQRA declaration at this poim, would help make the determination regarding the possible need and scope of environmental clean up before Mat-A-Mar moves forward with redevelopment of the property. As you complete your review of this application over the next few weeks, we ask you to consider the points we have made above and especially, to consider that this is one of the first opportunities for Southold to take advantage of the LWRP's power as a legislative tool. The LWRP was designed to protect the natural beauty, environment, and way of life of Southold waterfront communities. The way in which its recommendations are considered with regard to the Mat-A-Mar application, which is in fact an early test case, will affect other communities for years to come. Respectfully Yours Diana Schwatlm, President, on behalf of the Committee Cc: Scott Russell, Supervisor Members of the Town Board Members of the Board of Trustees Patrieia Finnegan, Town Attorney Mark Carr~a, NYS DEC Region I Deputy Permit Administrator Steven Resler, Coastal Resources Division, NYS Ekopt of State Steven Ridler, Coastal Resources Division, NYS Dept of State ERIC J. BRESSLER ABIGAIL A. W1CKHAM LYNNE M. GORDON JANET GEASA LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, BRESSLER, GORDON & GEASA, P.C. 13015 MAIN ROAD, P.O, BOX 1424 MATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND NEW YORK 11952 631-298-8353 TELEFAX NO. 631-298-8565 wwblaw@aol.com WILLIAM WICKHAM (06-02) 275 BROAD HOLLOW ROAD SUITE I I 1 MELVILLE, NEW YORK 11747 631-249-9480 TELEFAX NO. 631-249-9484 Mr. Steven C. Resler New York Department of State 41 State Street Albany, New York 12231 Mr. Mark Carrara Permit Reviewer - New York State DEC April 18, 2006 SUNY Stony Brook - Building 40 Stony Brook, New York 11790 Re: Application by Love Lane Acquisiti~ahvtpo'~fib'h- for Board Of Town Trustees Permit for work at MATT-A-MAR BY THE BAY SHIPYARD, New Suffolk, NY DEC Application No. 1-4738-01008/00008 Tidal Wetlands Permit For property located at: Suffolk County Tax Map No. 1000-117-08-18 First Street & King Street, New Suffolk, NY 11956 Dear Sirs: I am writing on behalf of the New Suffolk Waterfront Committee regarding this matter. The applicant has recently applied for permission to reconstruct bulkheads and walkways at the marina, on the same property as the above application for boat rack storage is pending. Attached is a letter that was submitted into the public record at the public hearing of March 22, 2006 of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold. The letter outlines the concems of the New Suffolk Waterfront Committee over specific environmental issues associated with the project for maintenance and repair of bulkheads to be performed on the same property covered by the above-referenced DEC application. A copy 0fthis letter was sent to your attention earlier as part of this public record. We are bringing this to your attention because we feel the Board of Trustees has failed to observe the intent of the SEQRA process and take a "hard look" at mitigation measures that might be required in order to protect ground and surface water quality near the project. We direct your attention specifically to the following items: a. Provide a justification as to why this project should be exempt from the environmental review of the larger boat storage rack project. b. Ask the applicant for revised drawings that more clearly show the proposed actions superimposed on the preexisting site conditions; such revisions to include but not be limited to: 1.) showing from where the 800 cubic yards offill will be removed, and 2.) defining where this fill will be stored during construction, until it is either reused or removed from the site, and 3.) indicating how the fill will be protected from stormwater runoff(in order to prevent contaminants within the fill from seeping into the surface waters of the bay), 4.) describing the purpose of raising the bulkhead on the north side of the property, and 5.) providing details about how stormwater runoff will be controlled and retained on this site during all phases of construction in accordance with New York State storm water management regulations, 6.) showing the locations of proposed walkways and bulkhead re-construction superimposed over preexisting conditions, Determine if any of this work requires coordination with the US Army Corps of Engineers. In addition, we respectfully request the courtesy of a written response as to whether environmental mitigation measures should be taken to protect the ground and surface water quality in the vicinity of this project. We believe that a determination in this matter cannot properly be made without specific information beyond that set forth in the application. Further, on this type of property, it is essential that the spirit and the intent of the environmental review process be respected. As you know, the Southold Town Local Waterfront Revitalization Program and the Peconic Bay Estuary Comprehensive Plan call for the careful monitoring of land-based activities on the ground and surface water quality. Sincerely, ~bigail A. Wickham Atch: New Suffolk Waterfront Committee 22 March 2006 letter to Southold Town Board of Trustees Cc~ Patrieia Finnegan, Town Attomey Mark Terry, Acting Director, Southold Town Planning Office Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chairwoman, Southold Town Planning Board James King, President, Board of Trustees AAW/jt L/dec-ns2 Encl. THE NEW SUFFOLK WATERFRONT COMMITTEE P.O. BOX 336, NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 March 22, 2006 James King, President And M~mbers of the Board of Trustees Town Hall (Bank Annex) Sou&old, NY 11971 Re: Application by Love Lane Acquisition Corporation for Board Of Town Trustees Permit for work at MATT-A-MAR BY THE BAY SHIPYARD, NEW SUFFOLK, NY 1. We have reviewed the application submitted by Love Lane Acquisition Corp. (applicant) for the referenced work. We have also taken into account the applicant's previous application (to the Tmstens and the p]nnning Board) for approval to cor~wact i~,uament boat storage racks end other related site ~ovements at their shipyard. The prlm,~y reason we are addressing you today involves the relationship between these two projects. 2. While it is mm the original Site Plan submittal for the boat storage racks did not specificelly include the muintenance and repair work described in the Trustm application before you now, this work must certainly be included in the larger scope of that application. As lead agent for the anvironmental review of the permanant boat storage rack project, the Town Planning Board hired an environmental consultant. The consultant identified deficiencies in the information presented in the application and the environmental assessment form. This report was transmitted to the applicant on July 22, 2005 for their review and response. As of today, exactly 8 months later, the plnnning Board has neither received the applicant's response to this study nor has gotten a reasonable explanation for their delay. Our position is: the Trustees nmst have the environmental infonnntion requested by the Plnnning Board for the overall proposal to develop the site before determining whether to approve the applicant's request to conduct maintenance, repair and new construction on the same site. 3. Although the referenced work is described as being primmily maintenance and repair of e~isting bulkheads md associated docking, there is some new construction described, n~mely "218 sq. fl. of walkways to be ~_d_a__,xl along bulkhead" ,md 'Bulkhced A-B on north side of property to be raised 1' - 0.' While it is fairly clear from the drawing where the bulkhead raising is to be located, it is not clear at all where the new walkways will be added. The drawings must be rev/sed to explicitly show the location of proposed construction superimposed over preexisting conditions. Further, the purpose of the new constmciion (raised bulkheadin~ and additional walkways) should be stated on the revised drawlng~, 4. Although the applicant claims this work is being driven by damage from this winter's storms, first- hand observations over the past few years suggest thc primmy reason these bulkheads and walkways need attention is due to chronic lack of repair and waintenanco since the applicant assumed ownership in 1994. This cells into question thc urgency the applicant is ClnlminS. We feel adequate time should bc allowed to integrate the assessment of this environmentally-sensitive malntei~mce end repair work in the context of the larger storage rack project. 5. Although this project is being presented as a routine maintenance and repair project, the histerical, industrial uses of this site indicate the potential for heavy metals and other soil contaminants to leach into the water dining this bulkhead work. If not properly managed, this project also carries with it a high risk of allowing seAimont to enter Cutohogue Harbor. Due to the extreme sensitivity of the Peconic Bay Estuary, and, in particular, this specific lend/water interfnce, the potentially adverse impacts of this proposal must be evaluated and miligated. 6. We are aware that the Trustees and the Planning Board have required environmental mitigation measures such as the consmaction of bent-wash down areas as part of requests by marins_q for approvals for site improvements. We are concerned that this proposal for replacement in kind and new construction, however "minor", is an attempt to segment environmental and permit reviews of the larger site development proposal. 7. In light of the above, the New Suffolk Waterfront Committee respectfully suggests the Tmstecs do the following'. a. Provide a written justification as to why this project should be exempted from the environmental review process of the larger boat storage rack project and related improvements to the site. b. Ask the applicant for revised drswinsq that more clearly show the proposed actions superimposed on the preexisting site conditions; such revisions to include but not be limited to: 1) showing from where on the site the 800 cubic yards of fill will be removed, 2) defining wh~re this fill will be stored during consUuction, until it is either reused or removed from the site, and 3) indicating how the fill will be protected from stormwator runoff(in order to prevent COlltmin~ltts within the fill from seeping into the surface waters of the bay), 4) describing the purpose of raising the bulkhead on the north side of the property, and the purpose of the additional walkways, 5) proviain~o details about how stormwater ranoffwill be controlled and retained on this site during all phases of construction in accordance with New York State storm water m*na~ement ragn!~fions, and 6) showing the locations of proposed walkways and bulkhead re-construction superimposed over preexisting conditions. Determine if any of this work requires coordination with the US Army Corps of Enffineers. 8. In closing, we appreciate the oppommity to pan'icipate in the public review of this l~,mit approval process and we hope the Tmstaes will address our cencems in a fair and timely manner. Aga~glliagiY__~ ~mk that the oublic hem'in~ for this project be held ooen the above-noted information has been submitted for public review and comment. Silly, ~Disn~Schwatka, President Cc: Scott Russell, Supervisor Members of the Town Board Patricia Finnegan, Town Attorney Mark Terry, Acting Director, Sonthold Town Planning Office Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chairwoman, Sonthold Town Plamfing Board Sheri Aicher, Environmental P~mit Reviewer, New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation Steven Resler, Coastal Resources Division, New York State Department of St~ta Steven Ridler, Coastal Resources Division, New York State Department of State March 22, 2006 James King, President, and Members Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Annex Southold, New York 11971 MAR 2 4 2006 Re: Public Hearing March 22, 2006 SCTM# 117-8-18 Dear Board of Trustees: I have questions concerning the ownership of the property under review. It was acquired by public auction/foreclosure August 15, 1994, by Love Lane Acquisition Corp., an entity incorporated June 16, 1994. The present application before the Trustees is in the name of this entity. However, the application for a boat rack proposal, still pending with the Planning Board, for the same property was submitted December 22, 2004 in the name of Matt-a-Mar by the Bay LLC, an entity incorporated September 24, 2004. The application for the same proposal to the Building Department December 17, 2004, was in the name of Love Lane Acquisition Corp., although the Notice of Disapproval January 4, 2005, was addressed to Matt-a-Mar by the Bay LLC. I would like to know, and I believe we in the community should be informed: (1) which corporation owns the property; (2) what is the nature of the relationship between the two corporations; and (3) the identity of the principals of both corporations. I would like to add that I am in full concurrence with the letter addressed to you by the New Suffolk Waterfront Committee. Thank you for your time and your patience. Very truly yours, · Robbins 16995 Main Street New Suffolk, NY 11956-0147 Cc: Patricia Finnegan, Southold Town Attorney Scoa Russell, Supervisor ~Jerembers of the Southold Town Board ilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson, Southold Town Planning Board Mark Terry, Acting Director, Southold Town Planning Office Steven Resler, Coastal Resources Division, New York State Department of State Steven Ridler, Coastal Resources Division, New York State Department of State THE NEW SUFFOLK WATERFRONT COMMITM P.O. BOX 336, NEW SUFFOLK, NY 119~6 March 22, 2006 James King, President And Members of the Board of Trustees Town Hall (Bank Annex) Southold, NY 11971 MAR 2 4 2O06 Re: Application by Love Lane Acquisition Corporation for Board Of Town Trustees Poimit for work at MATT-A.MAR BY THE BAY SHIPYARD, NEW SUFFOLK, NY 1. We have reviewed the applicag, on submitted by Love Lane Acquisition Corp. (applicant) for the referenced work. We have also taken into account the avplica~t's previous application (to the Trustees md the Plmming Board) for approval to conslruct permanent boat storage ra~ks and other ~elated site in¥,iovemznts at their shipyard. The prima/y reason wc are addressing you today involves the relationship between these two projects. 2. While it is rote the original Site Plan submittal for the boat storage racks did not specifically include the mainttm~¢c and repair work described in the Trust~ application before you now, this work must certainly be included in the larger scope of that application. As lead agent for the environmental review of thc permanent boat storage rack project, thc Town Planning Board hired an environm~Ial consultant. The consultant identified deficiencies in thc information presented in the application and thc environmental assessment form. This relx~ was transmitted to the applicant on July 22, 2005 for their review and response. As of today, exactly 8 months later, the Planning Board has neither received the applicant's response to this study nor has gotten a reasonable explanation for lheir delay. Our position is: the Trustees must have the enviromnental informstion requested by the Plmming Board for the overall proposal to develop the site before dete~,i,ininS whether to approve the applicant's request to conduot m~intensmce, repair and new consl~on on the same site. 3. Although the referenced work is described ss being primsrily maintenance and repair of existing bulkh~ld8 end associated decking, there is some new consUuction described, namely "218 sq. fl. of walkways to be added along b,,Ikhead' and "Bulkhead A-B on norlh side of property to bo raised 1' - 0.' While it is fairly clear l~om the drawing where the bulkhead raising is to be located, it is not clear at all where the new walkways will be added. The drawings must be revised to explicitly show the location of proposed construction superimposed over preexisting conditions. Further, the purpose of the new consuuction (raised bulldicadin$ and additional walkways) should be stated on the revised drawings. 4. Although the applicant claims this work is bein~ driven by damage from this winter's storms, first- h~nd observations over the past few years suggest the primmy reason these bulkheads and walineays need attention is due to chronic lack of v~pair and msint~llalleO silloO tho applicant assumed ownership in 1994. This calls into question thc urgency the applicant is clsiming. Wc feel sd~_,~luate time should be allowed to integrate thc assessment of fliis environmentally-sensitive maintenance and repair work in ibc context of the lapser storage rack project. 5. Although this project is being presented as a routine msimenance and repair project, the historical, industrial uses of this site indicate the potential for heavy metals and other soil contmnmants to leach into the water during this bulkhq, ad work. If not properly ~ this project also carries with it a high risk of allowing sed/ment to enter Cutchogue Hmtx~. Due to the extreme sensitivity of the Peconic Bay Estuary, and, in particular, this specific land/water inte~a~e, the potentially adverse impacts of this proposal must be evaluated and mitigated. 6. We are aware that the Trustees and the p1Annlng Board have required environmeutel mitigation measures such as the consiruction of boat-wash down areas as part of requests by marln~, for approvals for site improvements. We arc coucerned that this proposal for replacement in kind and new construction, however "minor", is an attempt to sngmant environmental and point reviews of tho larger site development proposal. 7. In light of the above, the New Suffolk Waterfront Committee respectfully sus$osts thc Trustees do the following: ~ Provide a written justification as to why this project should be exempted from the environmental review process of the larger boat storage rack project and related improvements to the site. b. Ask the applicant for revised drawings th~ more clearly show the proposed actions superim?osed on the preexisting site conditions: such revisions to include but not be limited to: 1) showing from where on the site the 800 cubic yards of fill will be removed, 2) defining where this fill will be stored during construction, until it is ~itber reused or removed from the site, and 3) indicating how the fill will be protected from slormw~ter runoff (in order 1o prevent contaminants within the fill from seeping into the surface waters of the bay), 4) describing the purpose of raising the b~Ikhead on the north side of the properly, and the purpose of the additional walkways, 5) providin~o details about how stormwater runoff will be controlled and re~ained on lifts site during ail phases of conslruciion in a~ord~nc~ with New York State storm water maangement regulations, and 6) showing the locations of proposed walkways and bulkheed re-construction superimposed over pre~.istin~ conditions. c. Determine if any of this work requires cooraln~ion with thc US Army Corps of Engineers. 8. In closing, we appreciate the oppommity to participate in the public review of this p~mit approval process and we hope the Trustees will address our concerns in a fair and timely manner. A/~;/~[/agi.Y_~ ask tbe/the public hesrln? for this pro_'~ct be held o~mm the above-noted infnrmstlon has been ~uhmi~ for public review and comment, chwatka, Pr~ident Cc: Scott Russell, Supervisor Members of the Town Board Patficia Finnngan, Town Attorney Mark Terry, Acting Director, Sonthold Town Planning Office Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chairwoman, Southold Town planning Board Shtwi Aicher, Environmental Permit Reviewer, New York State Dept. of Environm~tai Conservation Stevan Reeler, Coastal Resources Division, New York State Depm~anant of Ste~e Steven Ridler, Coastal Resources Division, New York S~_~_e Depamnant of State Paul Murp~, Westview Drive, Mattituck, Ne~ork 11952 February 13, 2006 Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Expansion of Mat-A-Mar Marina, Mattituck Dear Planning Board Members: I am a past president and present member of the Brower's Woods Homeowner's Association. This correspondence is to confirm my objection, and the objections of many of my neighbors, to the Mat-A-Mar Marina on the Sound's present application to expand it's storage facility. Specific objections are as follow: The present proposal does not conform to the parking requirements of the Town Code. The applicant's submission indicates that 247 parking spaces are required. The present proposal does not provide for those parking spaces. The proposed map that was forwarded to my neighbors show 55 spaces along the southern boundary as "existing spaces". These spaces do not exist and that area is used for boat storage. Further, it appears the required 9 foot width is not provided for with regard to those spaces. The map I examined did not show that area where the boat racks are located. Before the Trustees there was a representation that these racks would be along the north and west sides of the existing storage building which was to decrease the impact and maintain the residential atmosphere of the surrounding area. I understand there was a representation at the time the storage racks were constructed that the racks were "temporary" and the racks would be removed in May. It is my observation that the racks have not been removed since their construction. I am unable to tell from the proposed map provided to the neighbors if there is parking spaces proposed or represented as "existing" in that area but, if there is, the space should not be counted. In any event, the placement of the storage racks should be part of the Board's requirements and the racks, if permitted, should be required to be placed along the storage building in accordance with the representations made to the Trustees. It is rumored that an element of the proposal is to provide for parking spaces within the storage structure. The storage area requires parking, hence, the area can not serve as the parking area that is required before the storage space is approved. The result is contrary to the Code. In addition, a parking garage is not a permitted use in the zoning district wherein the property is located. Ve~'~IY ~outs, e ~u~¥~. Murphy PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON August2,2005 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Mr. Douglas Seeth P.O. Box 75 Mattituck, NY 11952-0075 Dear Mr. Seeth: Re: Proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC First and Main Streets, New Suffolk, NY SCTM #1000-117-8-18 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, yn B. Woodhouse Chairperson PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON August2,2005 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Mr. William Sertl P.O. Box 559 Peconic, NY 11958 Dear Mr. Sertl: Re: Proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC First and Main Streets, New Suffolk, NY SCTM #1000-117-8-18 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, ~oodhouse Chairperson PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair W/LLIAM J~ CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON August2,2005 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Mr. Stephan Roussan 415 Third Street New Suffolk, NY 11956 Dear Mr. Roussan: Re: Proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC First and Main Streets, New Suffolk, NY SCTM #1000-117-8-18 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, ,.,%rilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chair Planning Board Town Hall Annex Main Road Southold NY 11971 July 23, 2005 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: With reference to the proposal by Matt-a-Mar on the Bay to build storage racks for boats between the channing main street in New Suffolk and its harbor, i cannot imagine how that action could possibly meet the criteria spelled out in the recently enacted Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan. If one of the requirements laid down in the plan is to "enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources," the proposal fails miserably. The view from the little commercial street across Peconic Bay to Nassau Point and Southampton is one of the classic North Fork tableaus. I~ channing and it helps set us apart from over-developed areas that trade their maritime views for commercial ventures. If the town is serious about protecting the qualities that make it unique (something I'm not sure of at all when I see a CVS pharmacy being built in Mattituck, despite the fact that there is already one "down the street" in Riverhead, not to mention an Eckerd Drugs fight across the street), surely this plan for New Suffolk is a mistake. Hopefully, New Suffolk will be spared the urge to turn the North Fork into a Nassau suburb. Sincerely, William Sertl P.O. Box 559 Peconic NY 11958 July 13, 2005 To: Merk Terry Planning Board Town Hall Annex Main Road Southold, NY 11971 From: Stephan Roussan 415 Third Street New Suffolk, NY 11956 dUL 18 $out~old To~n Planning Boa,ri Dear Mr. Terry, Thank you in advance for your consideration of my letter. Like many New Suffolk residents, I am very concerned about the proposed Matt-A-Mar Marina project plan. I have already submitted letters addressing the inappropriate nature of building such a facility within the heart of our residential neighborhood. It has recently come to my attention that the board utilizes a set of standards against which to judge the merits of development projects like Matt-A-Mar: the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form. I was pleased and relieved to find its 13 policies to be well-thought and clearly explained. As a resident who has spent my lifetime just a few blocks from the site - and also worked on the site for several years as a windsurfing instructor - I would like to share my opinions with you on how the Matt-A-Mar project fares when evaluated against these policies. Policy 1: Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. The Matt-A-Mar project accomplishes the exact opposite of all of the above. It hurts our residential community character, permanently closes the opportunity to develop a site connected to the history of the location, develops open space with an industrial complex, takes coastal access away from the community and maximizes the adverse effects of development by increasing traffic, noise and environmental impact. Policy 2: Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southoid. There is nothing in the Matt-A-Mar plan that addresses the site's significance as the first U.S. Submarine base, former New Suffolk Post Office or any other prior use. Policy 3: Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. The Matt-A-Mar project would accomplish the exact opposite. The current water views are to be replaced by views of boat racks, industrial buildings, forklifts and parked cars. Policy 4: Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. Not applicable. Policy 5: Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. The Matt-A-Mar project is not likely to impact fresh water quality, but will adversely affect bay water quality in the Cutchogue Harbor area, including that of the popular public swimming beach a short distance away. The outlets of the estuary system of which New Suffolk is a part are many miles away, and little tidal flushing occurs. Policy 6: Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. Policy 7: Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. Policy 8: Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. A large-scale marina project can only have a negative impact on air, water, and habitat quality because of: oil, spilled fuel, noise and exhaust from boats, added cars and industrial machinery; pump-out facilities; use of the many hazardous chemicals, cleaners, paints, solvents, and fiberglass materials commonly used in the marine industry. Policy 9: Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. The project would provide recreational use to a limited number boaters who can afford to keep a boat at the facility. It does not promote public access to coastal waters. As private property, this may not be applicable, Policy 10: Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water- dependent uses in suitable locations. The project does promotes a water dependent use at a suitable location. The problem is an issue of scale and planning. Policy 11: Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. Sustainable use is an issue of critical mass. It is adversely affected by frequent use, development, traffic, runoff, pollutants, farming practices, and many other factors. The Matt-A-Mar project is one example of how - if left unchecked - "sustainable" eventually makes the transition to "unsustainable." Once that transition has occurred, there is no way to reverse it. Long-term sustainability requires making difficult choices at key junctures. For the future of the western Peconic, this is one of those times. Policy 12: Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. Not Applicable Policy 13: Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. Not Applicable Thank you again your consideration of my letter, please continue to keep the public well-informed of project developments. July 13, 2005 Ms. Michele Chaussabel 35 Orchard Street New Suffolk, NY 11956 Dear Ms. Chaussabel: Re: Proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC First and Main Streets, New Suffolk, NY SCTM #1000-117-8-18 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson July 13, 2005 Ms. Suzanne Fox 10 Kimogenor Point New Suffolk, NY 11956 Dear Ms. Fox: Re: Proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC First and Main Streets, New Suffolk, NY SCTM #1000-117-8-18 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson July 13, 2005 Mr. Jerry Schultheis 1640 First Street P.O. Box 299 New Suffolk, NY 11956-0299 Dear Mr. Schultheis: Re: Proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC First and Main Streets, New Suffolk, NY SCTM #1000-117-8-18 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code, All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson July 13, 2005 Ms. Danielle Hauss P.O. Box 226 New Suffolk, NY 11956 Dear Ms. Hauss: Re~ Proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC First and Main Streets, New Suffolk, NY SCTM #1000-117-8-18 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson July 13, 2005 Ms. Carol Lounsberry 17 Dolores Court Bayport, NY 11705 Dear Ms. Lounsberry: Re: Proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC First and Main Streets, New Suffolk, NY SCTM #1000-117-8-18 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. ,All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson July 13, 2005 Ms. Karen Paulick P.O. Box 782 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Dear Ms. Paulick: Rez Proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC First and Main Streets, New Suffolk, NY SCTM #1000-117-8-18 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson July 13, 2005 Ms. Mary Singleton 2135 Marlene Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 Dear Ms. Singleton: Re: Proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC First and Main Streets, New Suffolk, NY SCTM #1000-117-8-18 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. ,At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. ,At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. ,All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson July 13, 2005 Ms. Rosellen Storm Box 1237 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Storm: Re: Proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC First and Main Streets, New Suffolk, NY SCTM #1000-117-8-18 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson July 13, 2005 Dr. & Mrs. William Markel 950 Lupton's Point Road Mattituck, NY 11952 Dear Dr. & Mrs. Markel: Re: Proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC First and Main Streets, New Suffolk, NY SCTM #1000-117-8-18 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson July 13, 2005 Mr.& Mrs. Donald Mortimer 2245 Marlene Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 Dear Mr.& Mrs. Mortimer: Re: Proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC First and Main Streets, New Suffolk, NY SCTM #1000-117-8-18 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson July 13, 2005 Ms. Gail Tiska P.O. Box 307 New Suffolk, NY 11956 Dear Ms. Tiska: Re: Proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC First and Main Streets, New Suffolk, NY SCTM #1000-117-8-18 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson Karen L. Paulick P.O. Box 782 Cutchogue, New York 11935 June 29, 2005 Dear Ms. Woodhouse, As a resident of Cutchogue, I am writing to oppose the application of the Matt-a-Mar to construct a boat storage facility in New Suffolk. I believe that this structure will block the view of the bay and will NOT enhance the visual quality of the area. Please review this application and consider the impact it will have on the public. Sincerely, Karen L. Paulick Ms. Jeralyn Woodhouse, Chair Planning Board Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Gail O. Tiska PO Box 307 New Suffolk, NY 11956 July 6, 2005 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: I am writing to express my objection to the proposed development plan submitted by Matt-a-Mar by the Bay on the waterfi'ont in New Suffolk. The character of this tiny hamlet cannot possibly be enhanced by a project of this magnitude. I know you have all the particulars and the data at your disposal. I trust that you will adhere to the letter of the law as well as the consideration of this community and its residents and existing businesses. Sincerely, Gail O. Tiska JUL - 8 2005 DONALD W. MORTIMER ~ M_~_L.~c_k, NY 11952 ~ t! '7'I G% June 24, 2005 Rosellen Storm Box 1237 Southold, NY 1197 Ms Jerilyn Woodhouse Planning Board Chair Town Hnll Annex Main Rd, Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms Woodhouse: As I understand, Matt-a Mar on the Bay stated in its application to build a boat storage rack in New Suffolk that "The proposed marine use will enhance visual q,~llty and protect scenic resources of this historic maritime area". I guess beauty (read that as $$$$$$$$$$$) is in the eye of the landlord in this case. I can't imagine how three stories of boats on racks will enhance the visual q,,~lity of New Suffolk Right now, as I walk my dog, I can see the bay. Boats on racks or a bay- view, that seems to be a no- brainer for visual quality. Please deny their application for the boat storage rack and leave New Suffolk a beautiful and unique place. Sincerel)5 Rosellen Storm Jerilyn B. Wooahouse, Chairperson Southokl Town Planning Board P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY l 1971 Re: SCrM #10~0-17-8-18 Thank you for your letters acknowledging mine regarding Matt-a-Mar by the Bay. Please see the enclosed copies ofphotographs I took at Strong's Marina thia Spring. They give a good representation of how the propo~i boat racks would not only obscme, but obliterate, the scenic view vistas of the watt.mt cherished by New Suffo~ residents and many others in So.hold Town and beyond. There is no way the boat racks proposed by Matt-a-Mar by the Bay would "enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources," as Policy 3 ofthe LWRP Consistency LWRP on this IX)hat alone. There are many other concerns. Is the applicant's properly 3.25 acres or 3.5 acres? On which number are taxes paid? What isthe difference? Ifit'stmderwaterownership, has that issue been resolved? The restauram has not been in operation since November 2002. At what point in time is this usage disallowed, litigation notwithstanding? Ifit is allow~l, what are th~ proposed'Tmal" mmabers for seating, boa~ slips, and ~ spaces? Is any enlargemma part of applicant's plan for the future? W'rth regard to parking, applicant appears to regard the Town parklnE lot for the ramp as available for any public parking. In reality, the space is occupied d~ulag boat~g houxs (early to hte) by vehicles with the trailers used to launch the boats. What is the provision for supply and/or storage of fuel for the boa~s as they are put into the water?. Are they to be returaed to the racks with tanks at least partla!ly full? Are the biiges to be pum~d out, if so, into what? Most impo. rtantly, has the upland soil been sampled and tested? Nothing should be allowed to further disturb the soil before there is a definitive evabt~n of the 160 years of comnmln~tion. Tl~re must be a positive declaration on SEQIL~ The entire PmtnmY is the heart of thi-s hamlet. Its revitali~mlon must be small in scale, in keeping with the present clmtacter of the hamlet, as stated forthrightly in the New Suffolk Hamlet Study. As the LWRP states: "the hiE~h degree of environmental seasitivity, not m mention the unklue I~toric character ofthe New Suffo~ a~ea, in general, hiEhli~l~ the need for careful a~d limited It is hoped that an alternative plan to the one proposed by Matt-a-Ma~ by the Bay will be presented to the Town - one that is acceptable to New Suffoll~ reside~ consistem with the LWRP and the Hamlet Study, and achievable, with the help of the Towix 16995 Main Street P. O. Box 147 New Suffolk, NY 11956 Cc: Joshua Honon, Southold Town Supervisor Southoid Town Board of Assessors Southold Town Buikiing Department Southold Town Board of Trustees Southokl Town Board Southokl Town Zoning Board of Appeah NYSDEC - Stony Brook Plannil __~..~ Southold Town Planning Bo~r'~ VIA CERTIFIED MAIL June 12, 2005 Ms. Jerilyn Woodhonse Clathm~, Soulhuld Tuwn PM,,,,;,~g Bceard Southold Town Hall, PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: PROPOSED BOAT RACKS JUN 1 6 2005 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: This letter serves to convey my opposition to the large scale development of the New Suffolk waterfiout at First and Main StriPs. As a resident of New Suffolk for nearly twenty years, I have witnessed the slow but constant erosion of our town's character and historical foundation. In the last few years, however, the rate and scale of"development" is simply disheartening. The proposal to build boat racks is the final measure to usurp the remaining vesfige~ ora residential community and to replace it with blatant commercialism. The boat racks serve no legitimate purpose for the residents of New Suffolk. If the proposal were passed and implemented, our hamlet's character would be irreversibly altered. Not only would the racks clash with the historic downtown homes, they would dwarf them as well. Even if we could get past the negative visual aspects of the racks themselves, their size would still block the view of the Bay along First Street. Not only will the racks destroy the downtown's beauty, but the associated traffic, noise, and pollution will also irreparably impact the town and quality of life. There are no provisions whatsoever for dampening noise, ahafng pollution, or controlling traffic. For two hundred years, New Suffolk residents have managed to enjoy the water~nt without the boat racks. The only people to benefit from these racks are the developers. The Town, the residents, the waterfxont, and the marine life will be destroyed. Since the proposal for the racks is economically driven, it is necessary to state that the property values will surely decrease when the reeks go up. The boat racks ere to allow people to enjoy the bay, yet their very installation prevents New Suffolk residents from doingjnst that! So one must ask, whose interest are at stake? The residents' orthe developer's? I strongly urge the board to stop this project and to work to preserve the hamlet's character rather titan destroying it. Danielte Hauss PO Box 226, New Suffolk, NY 11956 Jerry Schultheis PO Box 299, 1640 First Street New Suffolk, NY 11956-0299 631-734-7265 schu127~a~qtobal net June 13, 2005 Ms. Jedlyn B. Woodhouse Chain~oman Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Woedhouse: JUN 1: 2005 I would like to take this opportunity to comment on the joint meeting held on the application of Matt-a- Mar on the Bay Madna in New Suffolk in May of 2005 which I attended. As a stakeholder who participated in the Hamlet Study for New Suffolk I am thoroughly convinced that this is not an appropriate project to be undertaken in this community. I had believed that a scaled down project might be worthy of consideration but after witnessing the recent actions of Mr. Raynor to purposely creata parking problems in New Suffolk I believe that ~ owner of the Marina is not a person who will respect the wishes of the neighborhood nor be a good neighbor. His initial actions in limiting the parking for Legends was clearly an act to annoy the neighborhood, but his further actions of June ~? and again on June 9"~ when he puq:~osely parked derelict unregistered trailers on the public roads in the public dght of way sumounding his property to prevent parking on the public streets cleady signaled the sentiment and arrogance of the owner that will prevail. In completing the review of the preject it is critical that a positive SEQUA declaration be mede for the prOject.. The history of the site regarding its use and previous prdjects proposed deady indicate a positive declaration to be in order. There is a long history of possible contamination which must be addressed. The adoption of the LWRP requires that its requirements of review be followed. This will be the first utilization of the LVVRP in the town and will be the add test of its effectiveness. The deS4gnation of the entire North Fork as a scenic vista needs to be enforced by denying this scar on the landscape The review meeting touched on some existing as well as new issues which need to be addressed. These include the follOWing: 1) The issue of who owns what land o¢ underwater land and who has the rights to it needs to be determined. 'lq3e legality and ownership of the underwater land grants need to be resolved. 2) There will be a catastrophe just waiting to happen with all of the fuel stored in the boats if the ra(As a'e alE~,,ved to be constructed. A boats fuel tank is typically filled for the winter to prevent condensation from forming in the fuel tank. The racks will handle up to a 15,000 pound beat. If you look at four approximate10, 000 pound boats (Pursuit 3370, Grady White 330, Century 3100 and a Boston Whaler 31 SF) you will find that each boat holds an average of 325 gallons of fuel. A total of 153 boats would contain a total of 50,000 gallons of volatile fuel spread over the entire area of the racks. The tyl:)K~al high winds which exist in the area will spread havoc far and wide if a fire erupts in one of the boats. The boats will be wrapped in shdnk wrap which will emit toxic fumes when burned. I personally am aware of 3 fires started by defeotive battery chargers that started fires in the last year. The conflagration will be worse than any forest fire and it can he whipped all over the area of the Hamlet Center by the ever present winds. Input from the Cutchogoa Fire Department as to their ability to handle such a disaster must be solicited. · Page 2 June 13, 2005 3) I personally found it interesting when Mr. Raynor indicated that Chuck Hamilton of the NYSDEC has taken a position that rack storage of boats is the preferred method of storage. What has this world come to when the DEC advocates such blight on the scenic environment? If in fact this is true then we need to examine the policies of the DEC. I believe that this issue needs to be confirmed with the DEC. What is to happen with our scenic vistas? What is the DEC's position on the toxic cocktail of battery acid, oil, fuel, sea water and coolant that drains from the bilges of the boat when the beat is taken out of the water and the drain plug is removed? 4) Transit of travel tifts and fork lifts over the publicly owned portions of Main Street and First Street need to be prohibited. A fork lift capable of can'ying a 10 ton boat weighs 26 tons for a total weight of 36 tons. This will cause extensive damage to the public roads. It appears that it will be difficult if not impossible to access the southern portion of the property without Imveling on the public roads. 5) There is no provision for rest rooms for the boaters or pump outs for the heads on the boats. Go to any Marina and watch the boaters make the mad dash to the rest room when they dock. Where will they go to relieve themselves? The last thing we want to see is public urination in the New Suffolk Hamlet Center. The temptation will be very slrong to dispose of the wastes overboard into Cutchogue Harbor rather than leave it in the holding tank, The nearest pump out is on Schoolhouse Creek at the New Suffolk shipyard. Can the shipyard handle the increased demand and more importantly can Schoolhouse Creek accommodate the increased traffic. The creek can only accommodate one passage in either direction in or out at its entrance. Mr. Raynor indicated he has a portable pump out facility in Mattituck. It will be impossible to move the pump out facility between the two facilities to mee~ the immediate demand for pump out at both facilities. Mr. Raynor indicated that the boats would have porta- potti's and that the boat owners would take the waste home for disposal. A Porta-Polti might be found on a 22' or smaller beat but you will not find such a device on a boat weighing up to 15000 pounds. How many people are actually going to take such a cargo home with them in a hot crowded vehicle? 6) Mr. Raynor claimed that the boats in rack storage are not bottom painted so there will be no pollution fi.om toxic bottom paint. In an ideal environment if ail the boats were brend new they would not have to be bottom painted. In the reel wodd most of the boats stored in the racks will have been previously used and already bottom painted. When the bottom paint is not periodically maintained the paint starts to fall off in large I:~ecas. The scraping of tho forks on the fo~ lift en the bottom of the boat will add to the amount of paint that is deposited on the ground, 7) At lhe review meeting a statement was made by the Highway supenntendent that there was ~e negative impact of tald?g the parking away fi'om Legends and that parking is not a problem. II that to the poople trying to find a parking space on the evening of June 10~. Those boat owners who will be expected to pa'k their vehicles under the 3 layers of boats above them will refuse to do so as soon as they realize that the hard wired bilge pumps in the boats will automatically pump out the toxic contents of the bilge all over them This will cause further parking problems on the local streets. Parking should not be allowed under the stored boats. 8) It was further indicated by the Highway Supadntendent that parking could be accommodated on First Street. One of the recommendations made by the stakeholders was that parking be prohibited on the east side of First Street south of Orchard because of the difficulty of tuming dght onto First fi'om Orchard because of cars paddng on the east side of First Street. You also have the situation of all the boats stored at Captain Mar~/s on trailers which ara continually moved to and from First Street creating i~a~T~cJams and unsafe conditions. The trailers extend out into the public right of way and prevent parking on Re streets, Access to a pdvate parking lot should be via a specific curb cut and not along the entire dght of way. Significant potential parking is not available due to the private commemialization of the eastern end of King Street · Page 3 June 13, 2005 to the bey. The town even maintains a street light to illuminate this pdvate commerc~alizaflen of a public s~eet. This public street should provide additional parking opportunities and provide the residents with access to the waterfront from the end of the road. 9) VVhere will all of these boats be refueled since there is no refueling facility at the Madna nor is there one planned. Again the nearest fadlity is Now Suffolk Shipyard on Schoolhouse Creek and I have previously addressed the limitations of utilizing this facility. I b~leve the fuel storage tanks at the shipyard only contain 4000 gallons. It is my opinion that all larger madnas in the town should have refueling fadlities, rest rooms, and pump out facilities. 10) It is a well known fact that not too far below the ground surface in this area of New Suffolk is an impregnable layer of day which will prevent percolation of waste matedal into the ground below. This condition demands a ~11 environmental assessment of the site because of its history of use. 11) A concept was raised that w~3uld swap the eastern terminus of Main Street for berking on some other portJon of the Marina site, The eastern end of Main Street and the views it affords are a critical pad of the waterfront of the Hamlet and must be preserved at all costs, The historical significance of the first submarine bese in the country will be cut oft' from the public. 42) There was soma discussion as to the traffic flow of the fork lift and the vehicles to be parked under the racks and in other areas. The layout probosed does not seem to have the possibility to allow the correct flow of traffic and needs professional evaluation. A vehicle with load weighing 36 tons is not going to be able to maneuver like a car. The westem boundary of the fadlity seamed to offer the most difficu~ for maneuvering. There will probably not be enough room for all the required parking. 13) The area of land involved must be calculated in order to determine if an area vadance is required. 14) The zoning requirements for the Mil Zone do not specifically address boat racks. Just as they did not address wind mills boat racks should he taken up by the Zoning Board of Appeals as well. In summary the proposed use for the subject parcel does not make sense. It goes against the concept of the LWRP. It is not consistent with the Stakeholders plan for the Hamlet of New Suffolk It destroys the history of the area. It is not consistent with the scenic vista designation of the North Fork. It is UGLY. Sedous consideration needs to be given to bess legislation to prohibit any additional construction of boat racks in the Town of Southold. They do not add to the character of the Town. I would also suggest that those candidates now running for Public Office in the town be boiled to give them the opportunity to present their views so that when it comes time for the citizens to vote we can make the dght derisions. Sincerely, Jerry Schultheis-6/13/05 CC: Trustees Town Board Cutchegue Fire Department NYSDEC Suzanne E. Fox 10 Kimogenor Point P.O. Box 101 New Suffolk, NY 11956 June 9, 2005 Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse Chairman, Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: Matt-a-Mar by the Bay's proposal to build three-story boat racks holding 153 boats and provide parking spaces for 185 cars would be totally inappropriate for the hamlet of New Suffolk. New Suffolk is a small, quiet, off-the-beaten-path, close-knit community. There is very little traffic, and the streets are safe for walkers, children on bicycles, and pets. Matt-a- Mar's proposed project would bring too many cars to our hamlet. The boat racks would be too high and would block views of Cutchogue Harbor. Their appearance would be out of character with the rest of New Suffolk. A small-scale project, such as reconstruction of the original post office and general store, would be a more fitting use of the property. The New Suffolk stakeholders report reflects an appropriate vision for New Suffolk. As a third-generation resident of New Suffolk, I urge you and all the Planning Board members to reject Matt-a-Mar's proposal. Sincerely, cc: New Suffolk Civic Association June 8, 2005 Board Members Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hal Main Road Southold This purpose of this letter is to protest the proposed boat racks in the shipyard at the end of Main Street in New Suffolk. We have an historic town that has charm, a submarine memorial, a popular restaurant, and a lovely scenic water~ont from which we watch the Wednesday night sailboat races. We don't need an unsightly obstruction on the waterfront that will block the view and cause traffic congestion and pollution. Please, board members, stand up to this attempt to disfigure our town and help us keep New Suffolk a charming and lovely place to live in and visit. Michele Chaussabel 35 Orchard Street New Suffolk PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON June 1,2005 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NYl1971 OI~'r]CE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Mr. & Mrs. Richard J. Huzanek P.O. Box 237 New Suffolk, NY 11956 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Huzanek: Re; Proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC First and Main Streets, New Suffolk, NY SCTM #1000-117-8-18 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, ~'Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson May 23, 2005 <<Title)) <<FirstName)) <(LastName)) <<Address1 )) <<Address2)) <<City)), <<State)) <<PostalCode)) Dear <<Title)) <<LastName)): Re: Proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC First and Main Streets, New Suffolk, NY SCTM #1000-117-8-18 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Matt-a-Mar By the Bay, LLC. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board Joshua Horton, Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook U.S. Army Corps of Engineers New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Department of Public Works FEMA Title Mr. Mr. Mr. Ms. Mr. & Mrs. Ms. Ms. Mr. Mr. & Mrs. Mr. Mr. & Mrs. Ms. Ms. Ms. Mr. Tom Samuels Mr. & Mrs. Mr. Ms. Ms. Mr. & FirstName James A. David Susan Michael A. Prunella M. John Elaine Carmela Clayton G. Newton Brian A. Frank Joan Anne Maria Mark Gary Betty M. Martha F. Frank E. LastName Baker III Dingle Pope Simon Brashich Spiegel Romagnoli Paciullo Gates Robbins Andrews Zory Doherty Lowry Auriemma Family Fedele and Ms. Nancy Steelman Schwatka Osborne Baker Baker Brophy Addressl 1600 Grathwohl Road Box 56 P.O. Box 76 P.O. box 303 P.O. Box 623 495 Jackson Street P.O. Box 116 P.O. Box 346 645 Jackson Street 16995 Main Street 235 Wicks Road P.O. Box 646 1300 Grathwohl Road Box 224 P.O. Box 317 P.O. Box 255 7092 New Suffolk Road 520 George Road 1200 First Street Apt. 315 1600 Gr~hwohl Road 75 Second Address2 P.O. Box 9 350 Oak Road 1230 First Street 3120 Grathwohl Road P.O. Box 147 Box 207 945 Fanning Road Brecknock Road New City New Suffolk New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New Greenport New State NY PostaICode 11956 11944 Title Mrs. Deacon Ms. Ms. Mr. & Mrs. Ms. Mr. & Mrs. Ms. Ms. Mr. & Mrs. Mr. Mr. & Mrs. Mr. & Mrs. Ms. Mr. & Mrs. Mr. & Mrs. Mr. & Mrs. Ms. FirstName Edward V. Audrey Rose Ann Frank Lauren A.D. Gwynn Lucille Mary I. Robert T. Joseph William Joseph Susan A. Jerry Tom Frank Lauren K. LastName Wetzel Wetzel Bums Castellano Grant Uterano Schroeder Field Goodman Grella Goldman Fenton Woodard Polashock moonan Schultheis Gleason Pesci Grant Addressl Address2 City State PostalCode Street 35 Second New Street 35 Second New Street 4370 New New Suffolk Road 1275 First P.O. Box New Street 304 President, P.O. Box New New Suffolk 642 Civic Association 17095 Main P.O. Box New Street 435 Executive P.O. Box Mattituck NY 11952 Director, 799 North Fork Environmental Council P.O. Box 639 New P.O. Box 679 New 930 Jackson New Street 300 Jackson P.O. Box New Street 611 55 First Street New P.O. Box 286 New 150 King New Street P.O. Box 299 1640 First New Street P.O. Box 336 New 300 George New Road P.O. Box 648 2980 New Grathwohl Road Mr. & Nick Mandusic Third Street New Mrs. NW Title Ms. Mr. Mr. & Mrs. Ms. Mr. & Mrs. Dr. & Mrs. Ms. Ms. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mrs. M. Ms. Ms. FirstName Dorothy Joseph A. Fred Patricia E. Gil Matei Laura M. Diane Paul Anthony C. Wemer G. Rose Frances Monica Joan LastName Sargeant McKay Suesser Mclntyre Goldstein Roussan Avent Harkoff Caccioppo Matson Kunz Liberatore Glander Bennett Robbins Addressl Address2 City 1155 Old New Harbor Road 16740 Main P.O. Box New Street 254 5055 New P.O. Box New Suffolk Road 331 P.O. Box 632 1970 New Grathwohl Road P.O. Box 85 865 Second P.O. Box Street 245 P.O. Box 149 Legends P.O. Box 321 P.O. Box 249 440 Third Box 35 Street 1045 First Box 668 Str6et P.O.Box 31 P.O. Box 102 240 Bunny Lane Chairperson, P.O. Box New Suffolk 147 Stakeholders 305 King Street New New New New New New New New New New State PostalCode Ms. Jane Lowry New M~¥ ~ New ~ufloltt Hamlet Study 5,_,mrn.~rv · New Suffolk Hamlet Center, the traditional commercial core of the hamlet, includes 21 parcels encompassing 8.97 acres, within the original 1840's grid and the waterfront. · Largest land owner in the Hamlet Center is the Love Lane Realty AcquisiUon Corp. now known as Mat-A-Mar Marina on the Bay which owns a 3.25 acre waterfront parcel at the foot of Main Street. · There are no vacant parcels in the Hamlet Center. · A Town owned 1.25 acre public beach is located in the Hamlet Center. · 3 zoning districts regulate land in the Hamlet center, R-40, H B, and M-II. · 50% of the land uses in the Hamlet Center are single-family residences, 24% are Hamlet Marine commercial uses. Only 8% are traditional Hamlet commercial uses. · The Hamlet Center supports 18 buildings, 67% of which are in good condition. · The Hamlet Center has a total assessed value of $113,500, generating $65,353 in total tax revenue annually. New Suffolk's Hamlet vision can be summarized as follows: · New Suffolk remains isolated from the rest of the Town by a band of wetlands, protected lands, and active farmland. The area within the protected band and the bay reflects a traditional development grid pattern, which it is essentially built out. · New Suffolk's grid supports a pattern of high density residential development (1/4 acre or greater). · New large-scale, high density development, is inappropriate in New Suffolk. · Limited opportunities for infill development do not exist in New Suffolk. The HALO zone should reflect the existing character of the hamlet and accommodate accessory apai h,ents. · New Suffolk seeks to reestablish its historic maritime heritage by revitalizing the underutilized waterfront with water dependent and water enhanced uses, at a scale appropriate to the character of the hamlet of the present, not as it was 100 years ago. · New Suffolk's historic character is a vital aspect of the area's "sense of place" and should be reinforced. The Hamlet Center boundary was designed to reconnect the business district with the waterfront. The Hamlet Center boundary runs along 2nd Street in the west, travels along the Town beach to the Bay in the south, follows the waterfront along the eastern boundary, and includes the waterfront property up to Orchard Street in the north, then south along Ist Street to King Street to its beginning at 2nd Street. · The proposed area of the HALO zone covers the entire developed portion of New Suffolk, outside of the Hamlet Center. The Western boundary corresponds to Grathwohl Road, the northern boundary is where Grathwohl Road and New Suffolk Road intersect. · The HALO zone is effectively, built out. Increased density for housing in New Suffolk should come from permits for second dwelling units. Such units can be either an apatb~ent in a single-owner private dwelling or in a separate structure. Stakeholders defined the Hamlet's strengths and weaknesses and then determined how to address each. "Smart Growth" sustainability principles were developed component of the Hamlet; including: · Human Scale · Waterfront · Streetscape · Vehicular Circulation · Parking · Pedestrian Circulation · Public Transportation · Building Design · Infrastructure · Maintenance · Enterprise · Housing · Open Space Preservation · The Working Landscape · Historic Resources for each basic Utilizing the general categories established in #6 above, various specific project recommendations have been compiled: Human Scale: ~ The development of a community meeting house within the Hamlet Center is recommended to preserve the human scale of the hamlet, thereby avoiding the need to utilize the school, which is outside the Hamlet Center. ~ Reconstruction of New Suffolk Post Office and adjoining or adjacent small general store, within the hamlet center. Waterfront: ~ Enforce consistency with the provisions of the LWRP. ~ Revitalize the underutilized 3.25 acre parcel to support public/private uses, preserving public waterfront access and uses while accommodating marine related uses (such as small docking facility for transient boats and a small marine motor repair shop) and other small commercial uses (such as one-story construction for small shops and/or offices). ~ Preserve the main viewscape of the Bay in the hamlet center. Prohibit any building blocking Main Street. ~ Preserve the opportunity to rebuild the Post Office and General Store. ~ Rehabilitate the restaurant without major expansion. ~ Prohibit rack boat storage and large boat storage buildings. Designate mooring fields in Cutchogue Harbor. Provide for transient moorings. Provide pump-out facilities. Lengthen the Town boat ramp for safer accessibility. Control runoff from storm water and road containments to protect the Bay. Preserve waterfront habitats, including wetlands. Make public restrooms at Town Beach available beyond the customary season, that is end of .]une to Labor Day. Keep trash barrels at Town Beach year-round with regular pickup. Add more benches at Town Park. Streetscape: Underground utility lines. On-going street tree planting program, including the replacement of damaged or dead trees. Maintain an unobstructed viewshed along streets to the water. High intensity lighting and neon lighting should be avoided. All lighting should be shielded and directed downward. The First Street streetscape should be enhanced with decorative streetlights, street furniture and a distinctive sidewalk (brick pavers etc.). Street trees should be planted in front of the present Post Office. Vehicular Circulation: ;> Install a stop sign at the east end of First Street and Main Street. > Install a stop sign at Orchard and First Streets. > Prohibit on-street parking along the east side of First Street between King and Orchard Streets. > All streets that end at the water should be accessible to the waterfront for use by the residents of New Suffolk. > Designate a truck route into the Hamlet Center (Main Street/First Street) and impose a weight limit for roadways not designated as a truck route. > Modest traffic calming is recommended throughout the Hamlet. > Evaluate all sight distance impediments at driveways and intersections and correct as required. · Parking: > No additional parking lots. > Prohibit on-street boat trailer parking. > Create a one day permit for a car and trailer parking. Provide parking either on the east side of First Street between King and Hain Streets. Enforce parking regulations, especially at the bay ends of the streets. Pedestrian Circulation: ~ Existing sidewalks need to be repaired and maintained. ~ Sidewalks and walkways should be limited to major roadways such as New Suffolk Avenue, New Suffolk Road, and Grathwohl Road. New sidewalks are not necessary on the smaller roadways. ~ Striping intersection crosswalks in the Hamlet Center and at the school is recommended. This might be done in conjunction with curb narrowing as a traffic calming measure. · Public Transportation: ~ A permanent bus stop is not necessary. Enhance Dial-a-ride. · Building Design: ~, Eclectic mix of architecture adds to the charm of the Hamlet. ~ Extend Architectural Review Board jurisdiction to include residential structures. [nfrastructure: Flooding is a major problem. The hamlet center is a flood plain. [t is recognized that as a waterfront hamlet, periodic severe flooding will occur, however, it is imperative that routine flooding be controlled. Opportunities to control and detain stormwater upstream should be investigated. A flood hazard mitigation plan is needed, as stated in the LWRP. Puddling on roadways is also a nuisance and should be eliminated through drainage improvements. Underground utility lines. NaJntenance: Adequate garbage management at all business locations is needed. Buildup and leakage of restaurant cooking oil must be prevented. Excessive dust and sand on roadways needs to be cleaned regularly. Excessive noise from businesses impacts the surrounding residential neighborhood and should be controlled through a noise ordinance. · Enterprise: ), The Hamlet Center should support modest and limited business activity. Large scale commerdal activity would be Inconsistent and inappropriate. > Exclude "hotels" from the list of permitted uses in the Hamlet. 7 · Housing: ~ Change zoning code to allow enhanced density in the HALO zone, specifically second dwelling units on eligible parcels. ~ Allow second unit as an apartment in a principal dwelling, or separate building ~ Define eligible parcels as those above 1/4 or 1/2 acre, served by public water. Over 100 such parcels are evenly dispersed throughout New Suffolk. Limit size of second dwelling, in the range of 850-1250 square feet. ~ Support affordable program with property tax policy: as long as program guidelines are followed, exempt or reduce property tax on second unit. > Second dwellings on residential parcels could also help preserve open space. Allow owner of a qualified parcel to purchase a development right from town DR holding agency: entitles him/her to construct habitable "guest house." Tax guest houses, and apply proceeds to affordable housing or open space preservaUon programs. · Open Space Preservation: > Highest priority is given to the ballfield and Town beach and park. The long term preservation of these facilities must be assured. > !mprovements to existing public access areas to the waterfront is a goal. · The Working Landscape: ~ Appropriately scaled traditional maritime businesses should be encouraged. Large scale facilities would not be consistent with the character of the Hamlet. ~ Exclude "food processing" from the list of permitted uses in the M-I! district. Historic Resources: ~ Designate the entire HALO zone as a historic district. There are 48 New Suffolk structures, past and present, on the SPL[A list. Three properties, including the present School House, are in the National Historical Register. Several large historic trees warrant special designation and protection. Preserve historic barn on the 3.25 acre waterfront parcel. !t is the sole remaining historic building on the property and is on the SPI_tA list. Regulate construction within district per approved guidelines, including architectural review for commercial residential structures. A VISION FOR NEW I~-FOLI','S COMMEIrlClAI. April 2~ We believe there may be a viable alternative to private development, which would address the concerns ol' Ihs communlly and those of Ihs environment. This alternative is public acqulslllon of the land coupled wilh commercial and recreallonal use ol Ihs site. If Ihla mix were achieved, the public would have access to the walerfront, and the commercial heart of New Suffolk could be revived. The site Is partially bisected by Main Slreet, as a cont nuallon of which extends Ihs old pier. With the parllclpallon o! {he Town, Ihls slruclure could be rebuilt as a Town Dock, pc[haps In conjunction with a relocaled town launching ramp, now ocated nearby at the loot ol. Jackson Street The marina, wh ch was severely damaged by Nor easier 92, could be rebuilt on a smaller sca e lo serve frans ant boat traffic (long lerm dockage at this ste has always been problematical due Io Ils exposure [o Ihs East).. The portion ol the slle Io Ihs North of Main Slreet could continue In Its role as commercial core o! New Suflo k, by restoring Ihs General Store/Post OIIlce, allowing Ilmlled expansion ot the Galley Ho, and by leasing space to olher small scale businesses which would operate as concessions o! Ihs pub lc landowner (as Is the case n numerous olher examples). In Ih s way "downlown" New Suffolk could be revived In keeping with the small scale o! Ihs existing hamlet. Similarly we would seek the peri c pat on and supporl ol the Cutchogue-New Sullolk -Ilstor ca Council, to create a salelllle museum of the one they operate on Ihs Village Green In Culchogue. This museum could conlaln historical adllacls and memorabilia of New Suffolk s sealarln his . g tory, Including the submarine base. Perhaps a builder and reslorer ol wooden boals could locate on site, adding a compallble commercial component, 1he portion of the slle to the Soulh of Main Slreet has a slrelch of beach, on which wlndsurfers are renled This operation could conl hue, perhaps along wllh a relocaled Old Cove Yacht Club. This could also be the slle of a sinai/park lo comp line, hi Ihs House" al Founder's Landing In Sou{hold, to be used for cornmeal New Suffolk Civic Assoclallon and others. by the n On~ benelll of Ihs public/pr vale nature ol this Idea Is I~ fundralslng. WIIh public ownership a broad range ot opl one exlsls for obis nlng Ihs financial suppoH ol olher public bodies such as Ihs counly and aisle. We would seek granls from an and all appropriate sources, publ c and prlvale. For the sake ol local conlrol we be~;ve It Is In Ihs best Inlerest otNew 8ulfo k and Ihs Town for lille Io be held by Ihs sma leal public chilly pracllcal, such as the Cutchogue-N~w Sullo k Park Dlslrlct, In conclusion, we envision a newly reslored hearl for our communlly, based on Ils hlslorlcal Idenllly, Its physical Ilmllallons and the realllles of Ihs local economy. We see this proJecl as the embodlm~nl of our commllmenl to New Sullolk, and as the best way lo achieve bur vision ol what Ills In a small Iown should be. Though sma l Ilseff, NeTM Suffolk Is ~ear and dear lo the heads of many people, who are all distressed by Ihs deslrucllon and decay of Its commercial bayfront. We ask you Io share wllh us IhlSnew vision for Its lulure. 1S Statement to the Southold Town Board By the New Suffolk Stakeholders December 7, 2004 We are grateful that the Town has given us this opportunity to state our concerns and our goals for our hamlet, and we believe we have identified for you the concerns and goals that are of vital importance in maintaining the historic character of New Suffolk. We have presented our vision. The following presents one new proposal and summarizes the main points of our previous statements. With regard to the priority issue of affordable housing, we submit the attached proposal, prepared by Tom C. Samuels and endorsed by the Stakeholders: 'q'he New Suffolk Approach: Enhanced Density." We emphasize the need for tbe Town to bring existing illegal accessory apartments and inhabited accessory buildings into the affordable housing program and to offer incentives to the owners of these properties to comply. We wish to make it abundantly clear to the Town that we consider it vital to our hamlet identity that any rehabilitation, restoration, or redevelopment of the privately-owned 3.5 acre waterfront property east of First Street (117.-8-18), included in the Hamlet Center, conform - in scale, size, and other guidelines ~ to the existing character of the hamlet and to the wishes of hamlet residents.. The dilemma presented by this property is that apparently it cannot support a profitable commercial enterprise, either in its present delapidated state, or if it is rehabilitated within the constraints of the hamlet and its character. We suggest that this conclusion points to the consideration of public, or public/private ownership, rather than totally private as it is now. The Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (Final, April, 2003) supports this conclusion. It identifies this property (117.-8-18) as an underutilized site. We quote fi.om the Summary and Conclusions (Reach 8, B., 1 .Opportunities for land use changes, iii Underutilized sites): "Previous redevelopment proposals have been dropped due to potential environmental problems and constraints on the site. Redevelopment action in this area should seek to maintain the marine-related character of the New Suffolk waterfront and the continuance o f water-dependent uses, but at a scale appropriate to the community. Future development also should be consistent with the property's Marine II zoning designation. Towards that end, the New Suffolk Civic Association has drawn up preliminary land use plans to be used as a guide for interested developers. The plan calls for a mix of public and private uses, which would permit shoret~ont access but also help to maintain the tax base within the school district. The plan calls tbr rebuilding the post office and general store in their former locations near the intersection of New Suffolk Avenue and 1st Street. This Plan also suggests land uses that will not cause excessive amounts of automobile traffic or other adverse environmental impacts. Total public or public-private acquisition of the 3.5 acre property are two options that could lead to the revitalization of this waterfront. A third option is for the Town to accept a donation of all or part of the site from the owner." Statement to the Southoldl~vn Board by the New Suffolk Stakeh~rs Page 2 And, (Reach 8, B. Summary and Conclusions, 1. Opportunities for land use changes, iv Areas of Special Concern) New Suffolk waterfi'ont: "The revitalization of this small and unique waterfront is of utmost concern to the residems for a number of reasons, ranging from improving the tax base to maintaining a cohesive sense of community. Until recently, the lack of public water posed a serious constraint to new or redevelopment along the waterfront. However, the extension of public water mains to New Suffolk has changed that equation. The high degree of environmental sensitivity, not to mention the unique historic character of the New Suffolk area, in general, highlights the need for careful and limited redevelopment." The other issue of primary importance to the hamlet is the preservation of the New Suffolk Schoolhouse and of the "BaHfield" (117.-7-1 and 117.-8-5), both properties owned by the New Suffolk School District. The Ballfield is our Village Green. The Schoolhouse is included in the National Historic Register of Places and Structures. The Ballfield is on the Southold Town Community Preservation List, as is the waterfront property (117.-8-18). We would add that we are well aware that Robins Island lies within the New Suffolk tax base and School District. It is adequately protected in its present private ownership, for which we and the Town should be extremely grateful. Final note: as Chairperson, I hope the Town will acknowledge these particular individuals who signed on as Stakeholders in good faith to contribute their expertise and to give their time and thought to this project. We care deeply and sincerely about this beautiful, historic maritime hamlet of New Suffolk, and we hope that the Town Board will take our recommendations as seriously as we do. Joan Robbins, Hamlet Stakeholders Chairperson Town of Southold Community Preservation Project Eligible Parcel List: January: ~.73889 113.-7-2.5 8.82 A t.73889 113.-7-2.6 8.62 A 73889 113.-7-19.23 37.53 A 473~889 113.-7-19.25 5.7 A ~-3889 113.-13-1.2 17.32 A 473889 114.-1-8.2 0.7 [t 473889 114.-5-1 7.14 mE 473889 114.-7-14.2 1.24 DF 473889 114.-11-30 0.47 H ~'73889 115.-2-6 22.73 AB E [73889 115.-2-9.2 2~ AB E 473889 115.-2-10 22.951AB E 473889 115.-4-8.6 32.3 A 473889 115.-7-13.1 16.69 A 473889 115.-7-13.2 16.55 A 473889 ' 115.-8-1 24.48 A 47~3889 115.-8-3.3 28.24 A 473889 115.-9-3 0.58 H 473889 115.-9-4 45.1 AF 473889 115.-10-1 15 AF 473889 15.-10-1.1 I AF ~73889 116.-1-4 2.62 AB 473889 116.-1~6 2.89 ABC 473889 116.-1-9.1 6.5 A 473889 116.-1-10 7.91 A 47~3889 116.-2-23 8.98 kDC 473889 116.-2-25.2 3.32 kDC 473889 116.-2-27 3.59 ADC 473889 116.-2-28.1 3.2 ADC 473889 16.-3-2 2.99 ADC 473889 116.-3-5 0.98 ADC 473889 116.-3-6 2.65 ~DC 473889 116.-3-8 1.09 ~DC 473889 116.-3-9 0.46 ADC 473889 116.-3-10 0.83 ADC 473889 116.-3-11 1.29 s, DC 473889 116.-3-12 3.4 $73889 116.-3-14 1.27 M2)C $73889 116.-3-16.1 4.83 ADC 373889 116.-6-5 2.31 ~DCF ~[73889 116.-6-7 5.75 ADCF 373889 116.-6-8 3.81 iADCF 473889 116.-6-21.1 1.19 ADC 473889 117.-5-2 0.55 H 473889 117.-7-9 0.11] H 473889 117.-8-5 1.42 B ,i473889 117.-8-18 3.48 BF 473889 120.-1-1.1 ' 33.24 A 473889 120.-I-3 13.57 A 473889 120.-2-3.1 39.19 A 473889 120.-2-4 4 A Page 15 of 17 Tax map numbers are in accordance with the best available public information as of January 2003. Ms Jerilyn Woodhouse Chairman, Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 May ll,2005 Dear Ms. Woodhouse, I've been informed through the New Suffolk Civic Association that a large-scale development is planed for the waterfront area in New Suffolk. Being a resident for 13 years I am shocked and appalled that this project would even be considered for such a small and unique hamlet. It would ruin and destroy this community. There are so many concerns to address before allowing such a massive invasion to change this area. The impact would be felt not only by residents of New Suffolk, but spread out to other towns as well· (What you do to a microcosm will be felt by the macrocosm). The traffic, noise pollution, loss of parking, loss of view, destruction of the old barn are just a few concems. I walk my dog ever day down by the water here, it is a special spot, and needs careful planning before any change is made. I believe this area could use revitalization, but with a sensitive approach that will take the interests of the land and people into consideration. Thank you for allowing me to express my views on this matter. Sincerely, Monica Bennett MAY I 3 2005 Suffolk NY 11958-0031 Monday, May 9, 2005 Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse Chairperson Southold Town Planning Board Post Office Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 MAY I 0 2005 Re: Mat-a-Mar Project Dear Ms. Woodhouse, During recent days the above mentioned project has been brought to my attention. As a resident of First and King Street I would like to express my sincere discontent about the nature and size of the Mm-a-Mar Project. New Suffolk's waterfront along First Street with its quaint and charming ambiance and historic site is certainly not the place for an industrial type development as proposed by the Mat-a-Mar Project. The project is a pollutant in every sense of the word. It will result in visual, noise, air, land and sca pollution. As responsible citizens we need to make every effort to reduce pollution. Yet, the project will increase pollution. To the contrary, in our endcavors to achieving b~tter quality of life the bay needs to be cleaned up instead and conserve the character of the arca. It is a known fact that for decades toxic substances have been let into the bay. Simply, the Mat-a-Mar Project is the wrong project for the wrong place at the wrong time. Following are some issues that loudly speak against the project: 1. Too much traffic on land and sca. Adding 150+ boats and cars will have an enormous impact on the environment. Currently parking capacity is already at its limits with traffic from Legend's. 2. Boat racks planned at 34 feet are much too high and create visual pollution and additionally could pose potential danger in the event of severe storms. 3. The project would eliminate the historic barn, the last original structure on the site. The nature of the business proposed by the project is a foreign body to the area and will not serve nor integrate the community. The site in question has much potential for a new project, yet it needs to incorporate the character of the existing community. Weme/Georg Kurtz April 30, 2005 Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chairperson, Southold T, Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 DIANE & DENNIS HARKOFF RE: Boat Storage Racks by Matt-A-Mar on the Bay (New Suffolk) Dear Ms. Woodhouse: As you'll see from the attached copy of the 1st page of a multi-page lease agreement, Love Lane Acquisition Corp. seems to have reacted to our opposition to the boat storage racks in New Suffolk by raising our rent from $400.00 to $1000.00 per month effective 5/1/05. All parties involved in this boat storage rack issue should be aware that we have chosen not to pay this increase. We expect that at some point, the fence, or some similar type of blockade, w/Il be moved closer to the street to prevent our customers from parking there. At such time, we will encourage our customers to revert to parallel parking on both sides of the street, as it originally was when Legends opened its doors back in 1993. However, parallel parking will not afford as many parking spaces as "head-in" parking does and most likely will result in overflow parking in front of homes on the streets of New Suffolk. Naturally, we anticipate that this situation will not be well received by our neighbors in the local community. Be aware, that in May 2002, we had formally approached the town with a request to consider diagonal parking on First Street in anticipation of the day when Love Lane / Matt-a-Mar would eliminate this parking urea. Although we thought that diagonal parking would afford more parking spaces, the town did not see it the same way. In light of our immediate problem, we will ask the Highway Department iftbey can re-exam/ne the diagonal parking issue or see if another more clever solution can be found. Sincerely, Diane Hurkoff CCJ Mr. Albert Krupski, Jr. President Board of Town Trustees Mr. Peter Harris, Superintendent Highway Department Joan Robbins PO Box 147 New Suffolk, NY 11956 P.O. Box 321 .835 First Street . New Suffolk, NY 11956 Ph: 631-734-5123 Fx: 631 734-2642 www.northfork.¢orn/legends Love Lane Acquisition Corporation Diane & Dennis Harkoff Legends 835 First Street New Suffolk, NY 11956 Apd122,2005 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Harkoff: You have been renting, from month to month, space on the parcel of land known as 656 First Street, New Suffolk, NY 11956 which is owned by Love Lane Acquisition Corporation. The area you rent is delineated on the attached Exhibit A. The rental space has bccn used by your establishment, Legend's, for customer parking and storage of trash and the rental payment has been four hundred dollars ($400.00) per month. Effective May 1, 2005 the rental will be $1,000.00 per month. The terms of the rental are specified in the attached Lease and Rider. The Lease Agreement is for a two year term. If you wish to continue to utilize the property, please sign and return the attached Leases and Riders with the required monies due, First Month's Rent and Security Deposit, by May 1, 2005. If an executed lease is not received by May 1, 2005, your use of the property will be terminated. Should you have any questions or need any further information, please do not hesitate to call me at 631-298-4739. Sincerely, Michael Rayn-'6t-- MR:jp MichAel P, aynor 1~0 Inle~ V'mw Hast Mattock, NY 11~2 Dennis & Diane Harkoff May 13, 2002 RESTAURANT Mr. Peter Harris Superintendent, Southold Town Highway Dpt. PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Fble Food, Spirits & Sports RE: Parking on First Street, New Suffolk Dear Mr. Harris: Currently, we rent parking space for Legends' customers on the east side of First Street from the Raynors (Love Lane Acquisitions). Street parking has always been allowed in New Suffolk, but after we opened up in 1993 some of the community was upset about cars being parked in the streets, too close to their driveways. They also were not pleased with the slightly haphazard way people tried to parallel park without the aid of curbs and painted lines to delineate the spaces. The Raynors offered us a parking area for our customers for what was originally a nominal monthly rent, but one that has crept steadily upwards over the years. As you may be aware, the Raynor' s future expansion plan shows that our leased parking area will be abolished. Although nothing has been approved yet, the community has already started voicing their concerns about "Where are people going to park?" and "What are you going to do about it?", etc. Well, we have ambivalent feelings about this whole parking saga. On the one hand, we absolutely relish the idea of not having to pay $400.00 a month for parking! On the other hand, our neighbors and our customers will be upset with the helter-skelter street parking that would ensue without a designated area, as they were when we first opened up in 1993. We would like to propose another idea, one that we think could be an amenable solution for both our neighbors and our customers, as well as for our pocketbook! Why couldn't the town make diagonal parking on that portion of our current parking area that is on town property? The severity oftbe angle could be determined depending how many feet of town property lies beyond the paved road. Diagonal parking would certainly fit far more cars than parallel parking could offer and would certainly be more neat & organized looking. It might be a simple way to resolve everyone's problem. Remember, "for every problem there's a solution". Your mission, should you choose to accept it (and I trust you will), is to help me find the solution! If for any reason you find that my idea is not feasible, please provide an alternative proposal. We would love to hear more about it. Sincerely, D. P.Q..Box ~21 · 835 First Street. New Suffolk, New York 11956. Tel: 631-734-5123 · Fax: 631-734-2642 lane l-:larKOlI www.nor thfork.com/legends April 16, 2005 Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse Chairman, Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall POBox 11 79 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse: I am writing this letter because I am very concerned about the safety issue related to the proposed project of Matt-a-Mar on the Bay in New Suffolk. During the warmer weather when the North Fork is generally more crowded, and in conjunction with the current lack of parking for Legend's Restaurant and the beach, traffic on Nlain St. becomes increasingly dangerous. If this proposed project were approved it would create an added hazard on our already overburdened unsafe traveled roads. It is a common practice for Legend's customers to park all along IVlain St. and on many side streets adjacent to private homes and on sidewalks where children play. Where will the additional traffic park? How will we keep our children out of harms way? Sincerely, Paul Cacioppo PO Box 249 New Suffolk, NY 11956 APR 2 2 2005 April 15, 2005 Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse Chairperson, Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 DIANE & DENNIS HARKOFF RE: Boat Storage Racks by Matt-A-Mar on the Bay (New Suffolk) Dear Ms. Woodhouse · Though some speculate that the storage racks might prove lucrative for our business, I am not convinced. Sure, it may bring in s little extra business, but on the other hand, it could substantially hurt our business as well. Let's face it, do you really think you're going to hear the local folks or the day-trippers say, "Honey, let's go down to Legends and have lunch, l'd really love to look at those really cool, monstrous 'metal filing cabinets" .for boats they have across the street while we eat." Oh, yeah, that'll be a real draw for us! Here are a few of the other things we are concerned about: 4 levels: "car parking" (allegedly) plus 3 levels of boats Who is going to police it to see that the ls't level is indeed used for cars and not boats? Quite frankly, we welcome saving $400. OO per month in parking rent; however, if there is street parking are our customers now going to be competing with the "boat people "for parking spots'? Entrance on Main Street for this marina (or is it an industrial?) complex Hmmm, wonder if our founding fathers Jbresaw Manhattan-esque parking garages'for boats' on the scenic waterfront years back? So, if the entrance is on Main Street that means' the sidewalk/curb area, where cars currently can park, would no longer be intact and available. That means even more public parking being taken away from existing businesses. No sanitary facilities What happens then? Before or after boating, people stop at Legends' and use our restrooms? Sure, we may get some extra business as a result, but there will be many more whojust come to use our facilities. Who is going to 'fund" our soon-to-be "public" restrooms and overtaxed cesspools? The town? Garbage/Cardboard Where will that go? We ave a "postage stamp" size piece of property, so will that then have to take up several of the street parking spots? People come to the North Fork not only for its picturesque seaside settings, the fresh air and natural beauty of our creeks, beaches, farms & parks, but as a haven of peacefulness & serenity. Somehow it doesn't seem that this marinal metal jungle & its accompanying forklifts will be a draw for the average tourist, (without whom Legends would certainly not be able to survive !). Imagine wanting to take a drive down to historic New P.O. Box 321 .835 First Street .New Suffolk, NY 11956 Ph: 631-734-S125 Fx: 631 -734-2642 www.northfork.com/legends Suffolk to see the soon-to-be rusting metal monster and to smell & hear the motors and fumes. Whatever are we doing to the pastoral settings the North Fork is renowned for, if we allow metal monstrocities to mar our beautiful landscape? Gee, why's everyone fretting so much about where Legends' customers will park? It's simple. Why don't we just join the metal-mania and tear down the house we own behind Legends on 2nd street (zoned business) and put up a 3-story parking garage for our customers' cars? Sincerely, Albert J. Krupski Jr., President, Board of Town Trustees Tim Kelly, Suffolk Times Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse Chairman, Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 April 11, 2005 Dear Ms Woohouse, ~ ~ ~ My husband and I have been residents of New Suffolk f~r over 32 years. We are convinced that our hamlet is one of the most beautiful place in the entire world. At a time where we have to be vigilant over some much destruction of our beautiful land, the marina waterfront project on first street is of great concern to us for the following reasons: This project is too large involving too many boats and too many cars for such a small area. The quality of the water in the bay would be affected and a great risk for our children and all the people using the New Suffolk beach. More and more, our public beach attracts people from many towns around and the parking is already a major issue. 3. The racks are too high and woUld destroy the neighborhood., Where would the patrons of the restaurant Legends park their cars and this narrow part of New Suffolk would be "suffocating" with parking and heavy traffic on Main street, which is a dead end street ! 5. The proposed landscape seems very insufficient for such a beautiful area. 6. It seems that the plans show no accommodation for rest rooms for boat owners and no pump-out. This is a crucial time for the North Fork. It is time for our Town Board to be extremely vigilant and prevent man made disasters that would have such a destructive impact on our environment and our historical village. New Suffolk is so much part of the History of the North Fork. We trust our Town Board to make sure that the right thing is done for the Hamlet. Respectfully, Michelle Roff~an Matei Roussan. M.D. 865 2nd street / PO Box 245 New Suffolk NY 11956 <mroussan~earthlink.net> To Jerilyn Woodhouse Chairperson, Southold Town Planning Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 From; Gil and Ellen Goldstein PO Box 85 New Suffolk NY 11956 April 11, 2005 To Whom It May Concern, This is a letter in response to the proposed Matt-a-Mar Boat Basin Project proposed for the New Suffolk marine area. New Suffolk has many problems which will be exacerbated by this proposal. The first of which is that there is not adequate drainage and flow in the waterway surrounding that quiet inlet. The fumes and gas waste which would be brought about based on the number of diesel and gasoline engines in that area would be a health risk and contanimate this waterway. Also, the fact that there is likely to be a great deal of toxic waste which would be stirred up from the submarine industry and this would also contribute to contamination and pollution of this beach and fishing area. The sewage problem would also be exacerbated by the increase in human traffic and there are no adequate solutions proposed for this problem. We know that contanimation of our environment will follow such a project and we intend to defend our area against this threat. Gil and Ellen Goldstein April 5, 2005 Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse Chairman, Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Ms. Woodhouse: I am writing to express my concerns about the building of boat storage racks by Matt-a-Mar on the Bay (New Suffolk) in the boat basin area of New Suffolk. The proposed project is of too massive a scale for the New Suffolk downtown and would entirely change the character of our small and intimate community. I selected New Suffolk to be my permanent residence because it was a walking town with minimal traffic and open views of the water all around. A proiect of this size would bring too much traffic on the 2 small roads leading into the downtown grid and way too much traffic in the small grid area, making walking to the Post Office and walking for exercise an unpleasant and unsafe activity. With the proposed height of the boat racks being the equivalent of a 3 and a half story building, these racks would now be the predominant feature of our historic downtown area. Instead of enjoying the water view, we would look at massive white plastic sheeting. I would also assume that our Town Beach at the foot of first street would become crowded with many non-Southold residents since the Matt-a-Mar parking spaces are adjoining the beach parking area. I would ask the Southold Town Planning Board to please work closely with the concerned citizens of New Suffolk and the New Suffolk Civic Association to arrive at compromise more suited to the location. Sincerely, Patricia E. Mclntyre P.O. Box 632 1970 Grathwohl Rd New Suffolk, NY 11956 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chair Southold Planning Board Southold Town Hall P O Box 1179 Southold, N Y 11971 We are writing this letter to voice our concerns about the proposed building of boat storage racks by Matt-a-Mar on the bay in the New Suffolk boat basin area. We reside on the bay side of New Suffolk Road, to the north of the proposed site. We have many concerns Safety is our most important issue here. The main access roads to this location are simple two lane roads and in many cases have no shoulders to allow for passing. We believe it would be dangerous to transport large boats through these streets. Additional traffic to these streets would be hazardous. These streets were designed to access homeowners, some of whom are just seasonal residents. Our small schoolhouse's safety is a big concern with additional traffic on the street adjacent to this building. We have one traffic light in this town and it is a "flashing red light". Ecologically it concerns us to think of the increased number of boats on the bay. Pollution is of utmost importance to all of us residents. We strive to maintain rules to keep our area healthy. What about sewage and pump out facilities for public access? This is a big concern. We are losing beach front in this area and our own beach this year has receded 10 feet due to erosion. What impact would there be on our beach with the addition of jetties or pilings? It appears that we would lose even more sand. We believe that the planned projects will create many problems caused by a large increase of boats in the area and many truck and cars on our streets. Having looked at Port of Egypt with racks the height of the proposed construction there is no doubt that these are unsightly and would be a detrimental addition to our area. Please consider these concerns seriously. We care about our little hamlet and want to keep it safe and unpolluted. Please look carefully at this project with the thought of amending it or totally denying it. Thank you, Elayne and Fred Suesser 5~5 New Suffolk~Road / ~"P~ 0 Box 331, N~w Suffolk, NY 11956 March 30, 2005 Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse Chairman, Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Reft "Matt-a-Mar on the Bay" application to build boat storage racks in New Suffolk at the site of the former North Fork Shipyard/First US Submarine Base/Tuthill Steamship Pier Dear Members of the Planning Board, Matt-a Mar, like each of the holders/owners of this property since 1982, wants to make good on its investment. Unfortunately, their proposal, and the small hamlet qualifies which make New Suffolk a special place, are in conflict. A lack of vision of a viable future for the property, has afflicted successive owners. One after another, they have sought to justify overdevelopment of the property, citing the expense of acquiring it and servicing mortgage debt. Overblown ideas of what the fragile parcel could support have led to a series of immodest proposals, all subsequently withdrawn or disapproved, collapsed under the weight of their inappropriateness and community protest. This pmporty, given the cimumstances oE 1) its location at the foot ora grid of small residential streets; 2) its dimensions, a wide but narrow parcel wedged between one of the Hamlet's streets and Cutehogne Harbor; 3) its environmental problems from the past and continuing sensitivity, and 4) its historical significance, calls for light, sensitive development which takes these cimumstances into account rather than ignores them. We do not need more boats stored at this location in a fashion that creates a wall separating the community from the Harbor and Bay to which it has been historically and intimately connected. We do need to break the juggernaut that has kept this property in a perpetual state of disarray, its tree value a big question, its grounds poorly maintained, its restaurant building untenanted, and its future use uncertain. Real estate values of nearby properties would be increased, sales more easily concluded, and the community's more appropriate vision for the waterfront achieved, if the use of the property was resolved. The New Suffolk community is, as it has been since 1982, united in its determination not to have our "special place" rendered unlivable by unrealistic development proposals. I hope that this project seems as inappropriate to each of you as it does to me. Thank ~'ou , for your attention, and please call on me should you have any questions regarding my views. Y~ truly~, / J~s~ph A. Mc Kay [ Pa~t President, New S{~ffolk Civic Assoc. ~6740 Main Street PO Box 254 New Suffolk 11956 631-848-7870 March 23, 2005 Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse ,Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Woodhouse, In the twenty six years that I have been a property owner in New Suffolk, a number of plans, projects, proposals and preposterous ideas have zeroed in on the New Suffolk waterfront, but probably none so utterly banal as the building of boat storage racks proposed by Matt-a-Mar on the Bay. A great deal of the beauty and history of Long Island still hovers over that New Suffolk waterfront. This is a legacy that deserves careful attention, which I am sure it will receive fi.om the members of the Southold Town Planning Board. Piling too many boats on ugly boat racks that are too high, with the concomitant crowding and ugliness of car parking, is a project suitable for some secluded, sheltered and shrouded spot. Surely, this is completely unsuitable to the New Suffolk waterfront. Sincerely yours, Dorothy Sargeant 1155 Old Harbor Road New Suffolk, NY 11956 Ms. Gerilyn woodhouse** We are home owners in new S.,i~olk on third street And are shocked and upset with the plans to comet boat Slips and storage of boats in new S.~oll~ Presently ,the new sufJolkwaterfront is one of the Most beautiful areas on Peconie Bay. The beaeh is used by Families, s~vimmers and wind surfers. It's aprime locatio~ Vbit some of the other boat yards and see what they Have done for the area--nothing. They pollute the air and water with the smell of oil And fuel spillings. In time the people stop using the he. eh, Property values deere~e and people move out. The additional traffic will cause danger to our Children attending the little red sehool house on new Stt~:~olk Road and Orchard ttreeL The projeet is just too large for the We hope you find time to visit our area and then ask Yourself this questio~'If I lived here would i want this in my hek yard". S'meerely,. Louren K. GPant 2980 Grathwohl RDad POBoxB48 New Suffolk. NYII956 March 21. 2005 Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse Chairman, Southold Town Planning Board Southeld Town Hall I~0 Box 1179 Southold. NY ll971 As a resident of New Su~lk. let alone the North Fork I real ze that chanoe is inevitable and that we must accommodate it as much as poasible. However, I feel it incumbent to poiot out that there is very little room for change in the~small hamlet of New Suffolk. Our waterfront area, already hit an several fronts during the summer months, is very vulnerable and needs to be protected ss much as possible. It is very similar to other small, treasured areas such as Founders Landing in SDUthold and the Orient Yacht Club. similar because they are used carefully, and the surrounding lands cared for by the people who live near them. Here in New Suffolk, we already have major problems that have been getting progressively worse with each passing season. Many people frDm outside the area now park their cars and walk to the Town Beach. never having tD pay for a day sticker. The beach is ne longer available on weekends to those of us who live here because there is simply no room to park. swim Dr just sit on the beach. Boaters trail in their boats, launch them at the town ramp and then park their cars. trucks and trailers all over the streets paying no attention to the amount of room they take or bothered by the fact that they cause major safety issues to pedestrians and drivers alike. I think you would be surprised by the number of boats that are already causing a severe impact on the water quality in the bay and making it a difficult place to swim safely. Having another 150 or more boats would certainly not help this situation. Having read the Town's recently passed Waterfront Revitalizatioe Program. I feel that they have come up with a very good ~n for the waterfront areas, New Suffolk's included. However.'the:p!an proposed by the Matt-A-I,lar people is not the ,w, ay te re_vitalize this precious ~and historic a~ea. This ist~articularly true.as pertains to t~eir idea of taking down the last standinq barn that was part of the old waterfront to make roQm for a building to house garbage and recycling. This alone would be a treoedy. Throw in I17 boat racks, 153 heats, 105 cars. and a 1400 -I square foot boat shop would be a crime. They will have succeeded in turning the pride and joy of New Suffolk into a major industrial park that would destroy its essence. On a positive note. I was impressed by the pains taken by the Robins Island Group in designing a building and surrounding it by landscaping that was very much in keeping with the New Suffolk waterfront and would urge the Planning Board to use their example in working with Matt-A-Mar On the Bay. In a final note. there are already many people leaving this area. It would be a shame to see the plan proposed by Matt-A-Mar On the Bay go forth thereby providing one more reason for more of us to move on to other parts of the country. After all, the charm of New Suffolk is its old-fashioned feel and its waterfront. Sincerel.3.~.-~ [auren Grant March 20,2005 To: Ms.Jerilyn woodhouse Chairman,Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall P.O.Box 1179 Southold,N.Y. 11971 RE: Planned Development Mat-A- Mar by the Bay,Inc. New Suffolk,N.Y. 11956 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: My wife and I are very concerned about this planned project for the Hamlet of New Suffolk.We feel the scale of this proposed plan is too large for the site. The number of boats and automobiles would be too great for the area. The sight of high racks blocking the view of the water from First Street would be unightly at best. There are no accommodations for Rest Rooms, for boat owners amd their visitors. Also no plans for pump-out facilities for boat owners. Specifically, we consider this project an abuse to taxpayers and residents of New Suffolk. Sin/¢erely Your? ,/~ ~ France~ ~ & · Residents:300George Road New Suffolk N.Y.11956 t,,'AR 2 .r., P.O. Box 336 New Suffolk, NY 11956 March 20, 2005 Planning Board Town of Southold P.O. Box I 179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Planning Board: It has been brought to our attention that the Mat-A-Mar on the Bay Marina is planning to expand the facility in New Suffolk. We have several concerns that the Planning Board should consider: 1) New Suffolk is "peninsular" with the only main access to the town via quiet residential neighborhoods. 2) In order to support the quantity of boats being considered, Mat-A-Mar is proposing the installation of many 3 tiered boat racks. This has several adverse side effects: a~ The views to the harbor would be severely obstructed, b. They are downright ugly c. They will take away the ah'eady limited parking for the town. 3) Such a large quantity of boats would naturally imply the need for extensive parking and would result in excessive traffic and congestion in the town and the surrounding neighborhoods. 4) To move such a large quantity of boats in and out during the summer weekends would require additional boat lifting ramps and bays as well as large fork lift equipment. 5) The large, high-powered sodium vapor lights on the existing site already generate harsh light to all the homes on the eastern shore of New Suffolk. Presumably more lights would be added to the already unacceptable, harsh and invasive lighting. 6) The eastern shore of New Suffolk is suffering fi.om extreme erosion in large part because of the Mat-A-Mar slips and the curved rock revetment, which block the natural sand flow fi.om the north race of Robin's Island to the eastern New Suffolk shore toward Boatman's Harbor (aka Wickham's Creek). All the homeowners on the shore are working with the Trustees, DPW and DEC to come up with a solution to this very serious erosion problem. Further expansion of the slips and revetment would spell disaster for the shoreline and result in furtl~ damage to our property. 7) The Mat-A-Mar marina is on a modest sized parcel (3.5 acres) and it is our opinion that this is akin to trying to fit 2 pounds of sugar into a 1 pound bag. It simply doesn't scale. 8) The additional boat traffic would require gas and diesel docks and pump-out facilities, which are an environmental hazard to the already damaged shellfish beds and bird 9) The marina expansion would further imply the addition of moorings in the already crowded Cutchogue Harbor. There is simply no room. 10) New Suffolk already has the environmentally friendly New Suffolk Shipyard as well as the marina slips in Boatman's Harbor. We don't need another marina, especially in such an exposed and sensitive location. 11) It would seem to make more sense to have public or public/private ownership of this parcel, converting it to a park, with perhaps some small shops, a restaurant, modest boat docking facilities and an area for parking and modest boat storage for the off-season. Here is a chance for the Town of Southold to do the right thing for one of the jewels in its crown: New Suffolk. We appreciate your attention to this matter and we appeal to your sense of reason and fair play based on the facts. For further information, please contact Tom Gleason at the address above, 631-734-2773, or tom. gleason~xlnetic.com. Sincerely, Tom and Nancy' Gleason Jerry & Call Schuttheis PO Box 299, 1640 First Street New Suffolk, NY 11956-0299 631-734-7265 schu 127¢~,a~Rlobal net /)i/ March 17, 2005 Ms. Jedlyn B. Woodhouse Chairwoman Southold Torch Planning Board Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: As residents of New Suffolk we would like to take this opportunity to address the upcoming issue of the request to build boat storage racks at the Matt-a-Mar on the Bay Marina in New Suffolk The concept of building such a structure is completely out of character for New Suffolk as well as for the entire Town of Southold. The boat racks that exist already in the town are blight on the landscape and block the scenic waterfront vistas throughout the entire town. Unfortunately boat racks themselves are not specifically addressed in the allowable uses in both the MI & Mil zones in the town. Since they are not addressed as a spedflc allowable use they should be banned. I doubt that any boat racks existed in the town when the code was written. The entire Norl~ Fork along the Route 25 corridor has been designated to be a protected scenic vista. The racks are not a beauty to behold. The proliferation of the unsightly boat racks should not happen in New Suffolk or in the entire Tow~ of Southold. The tax parcel in question has significant historical value which will be destroyed if the racks are constructed. The parcel contains the following histodc sites from the Town of Southold SPLIA list: Houston's Barn (which will be destroyed), the odginal Galley Ho restaurant, the site of the Post Office and the site of the first submarine base in the country. All of this history will be lost forever. The proposed racks will handle up to a 15,800 pound boat. A boat that size combined with the weight of the fork lift to carry it will ruin the east end of Main Street. The weight will destroy the road. It does not seem possible that travel across the town road can be avoided. The bilge of a boat collects an interesting mixture of sea water, engine oil, transmission fluid, anti- freeze, and battery acid. Normally when a boat is removed from the water by the fork lift the hull drain plug is removed to prevent the hull from collecting rain water, The cocktail of toxic fluids within the hull will ddp out of the boat as it is moved between the water and the rack. This toxic cocktail will also drip all over the oars parked under the boats and when the cars leave additional toxic matedal wilt be spread all over New Suffolk. There will be hazardous materials present contrary to the statement in the application. The fork lift will be large to handle a 15,800 pound boat and it will create constant loud noise and noxious diesel fumes as it traverses the marina all day long 7 days a week, Again contrary to the statement in the application that the noise generated will not exceed the ambient noise there will be excessive noise for more than one hour per day. Oders from the fork lift engine and garbage generated will be produced for more than one hour per day again contrary to the statement in the application. A total of 153 boats and 185 vehicles will add significant traffic to the area contrary to the statement in the application. The loss of parking for Legends plus the additional parking for the madna will choke the entire area with vehicles. Parking and congestion in the hamlet willrt~ nightmare. It is bad enough that existing town streets are used for private commercial uses ar~ are i!luminated with a streetlight provided by the town at the east end of King Street right next to the proposed project. · Page2 March 17, 2005 The boat traffic from 153 boats will overwhelm the moodng capadty of the cove at Robbins Island. Increased landings on the delicate sand spit will destroy the bird population which nests there. The quality of the bay will be compromised. There is no provision for how the solid and liquid waste from the boats, boaters, wod~ers, restaurant patrons, etc. will be accommodated. The application states that no sanitary or water will be required. The issue of what to do with human waste from the people who use the facility as well as a pump out fadlity for the boats has not been addressed. The site has a reputation for being saturated with toxic materials yet the application says the site has not been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes. The application claims the proposed use is compatible with the adjoining/surrounding land uses within ¼ mile. Our recollection of the zoning map as it existed on the wall in town hall before the move to the annex showed this site to be zoned Mil and the surrounding area to be MI or residential. The new zoning map in the town hall annex does not agree with the odginal that was in town hall. When were the boundaries of Mit expanded? The height of the racks with boats on them will ruin the scenic views from the Hamlet Center. In the winter the sound generated by the wind blowing the shrink wrap on the boats will be a serious distraction for the entire surrounding area. In summary the pr(:~oosed prOject is out of character with the area and should not be allowed. The upcoming Hamlet plan by the stakeholders should be reviewed for this section of the center of the hamlet of New Suffolk. March 18, 2005 March 18, 2005 SUSAN A. NOONAN MANAGING PARTNER SAN GROUP, LLC 27 N MOORE STREET, SUITE lOC NEW YORK, NY 10013 T E12 966'3650 M 917 513-5303 SUSAN$SANOONAN.COM 3erilyn B. Woodhouse Chair Southold Planning Board Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Woodhouse, ~' am writing you today to voice my concern about the building of boat storage racks by Matt-a-Mar on the Bay in New Suffolk boat basin area. We are very upset about the scale of the projects. There will be too many boats and too many cars. There will be a negative impact on the water quality of the Bay from so many boats. The 35 foot height of the racks will dwarf the surrounding properties. It will be unsightly and obstruct our views. There will be a negative effect on the availability of parking for Legends and on the neighboring streets. There is insufficient landscaping of the site. They are also proposing to demolish the old, historic barn which is the last original building on the site. As a mother of young children, ! am very worried about the dangers presented by more cars on our road and more people in our quiet community. For all these reasons, we want to block this proposal. Sincerely, -~S~san A. Noonan 150 King Street New Suffolk, NY 16 year resident P.O. Box 286 New Suffolk March 17, 2005 ~7/ Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse Chairperson, Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Ms. Woodhouse, As a resident of New Suffolk, I would like to voice my concerns about the proposed project called Matt-a-Mar on the bay on the East side of First Street, North and South of Main Street. 1. The storage racks are too massive for the area and would be unsightly. 2. Hurricane force winds and loaded racks would be a recipe for disaster. 3. Disturbing the ground with excavations for footings would expose old pollutants that have been buried for many years. I have personally seen large amounts of paints and solvents poured onto the ground in this area. 4. The noise, light and chemical pollution would overwhelm the neighborhood. 5. The traffic would increase to an unacceptable level. It is already congested during the summer season with beach and ramp use. 6. It would be a dawn to dusk or beyond operation, seven days a week. 7. It would grossly affect the ecology of the Bay with more intense use. 8. I'm sure a fueling facility would be added to serve the boaters, adding another potential for pollution as well as other hazards. 9. The old "flavor" of the village has been degraded over the years. This will be the final insult to what once was a beautiful and peaceful little village. Thank you for hearing our concerns and your attention to this matter. Joseph & Eleanore Polashock gAB 2 ~.;~4 /,'i-Me Joseph Fenton 300 Jackson Street PO Box 611 New Suffolk, NY 11956 Jerilyn B. ~oodhouse, et al Southotd Planning Board Southold Town Hall P.0. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 March 15, 2005 Re: Matt-A-Mar on the Bay Gentlepersons: I am submitting this with respect to the recent proposal which affects the New Suffolk community. I am f~m~liar with the site, having lived within a mile of it for 80 years. I purchased several boats from a previous owner of the site and rented slips there, as did my father before me. I served on the Board of Directors and as chairman of the Loan Committee of the bank that refused to make a loan secu:e~ by the property. I represented a previous owner, as her attorney. I represented the community, successfully, when a previous owner attempted to have the proper~ rezoned for condominium use. In addition to the usual suspects that you will and certainl~ should take into account in coming to any conclu- sions, parking, traffic, view, size, etc., there are several whose importance transcends these considerations, and may well, indiv- idually, constitute grounds to reject the entire proposed concept. Taken together, they mandate rejection. First, and most important, is public safety, and the impact of the proposal on it. Can a working, tiny, boat yard using these storage racks, be compatable with an on-site restaurant frequented by the public? Is there not an inherent danger where working fork lifts, trailers and the vehicles that pull them, share the same space as does the public, including children, visiting the restaurant? Is not the site too small to accomodate both? After all, if the site were large enough, there would be no need for racks. The danger alone should prevent the proposed use. You would be re- miss if you failed to prevent an injury or a fatality here, should this be ignored or overlooked. Second, if racks were approved, would not there be a problem foisted on the public launching facility ~h±ch adjoins the site and would not the boat yard have effectively incorporated this facility into its operation? As it is, at busy times, assuming about l0 minutes per launch or retrieval, with 6 to the hour, long lines of trailers await t~e±r ~urns. The cloggin~of the.a~ea, parking and traffic woul~ ~n2enst~y. Even if only ~0% or $0% o~ the racked boatsutilize the launching facility on a given day, w~uld it not be enough to tip over whatever even flow might exist? If the stored~ts are not launched, what is being created? A storage yard, verticle instead of horizontal - perhaps to accomodate Matt-a-Mar's Mattituck overflow - a reservoir of work until such time as they can get to them. If this use is contemplated or eventuates, there will be back and forth traffic to consider. Third, toxic, contaminated fill. The original 2~ acre propenty (now enlarged by fill to 3~ acres), ended at the high water mark at the exact foot of Main Street. A line drawn from the high water marks of the abutting properties to the north and the south of this site crosses the end of Main Street at its foot. The present land southeast of such a line is all filled in land and constitutes i acre of the 3~ acre site. This i acre is part of the underwater grant. This filled land and the original 2~ acre piece, over the past century and a half, has accumulated contaminants that affect the site and the adjoining bay, and should be removed and cleansed before any work is contemplated. A prior owner sought financing with respect to its development. Because of the potential cost of dealing with this accumulation of hazardous material, the bank refused to consider the loan, fearing that if foreclosure became necessary, as the owner of the site, the bank might be forced to do the clean up and be faced with costs far in excess of the property's value. Fourth, the validity of the New York State Underwater Grant°Shat forms a part of the property, and the fact that the State reserved for itself certain mining rights. How can the State cause the grant to be mined, if fill and buildings interfere? Was the limited time period observed, during which the grantees could ereate the Port that was envisioned? I direct the Board's attention to ~ne s~atsment made at a public hearing on November l, 1983, before the Southold Town Board, by william Esseks, on behalf of the owner of this site. " .... 200 boats, where you put gasoline in, you take gasoline out. You repair them, you spray them where you use power sprayers to spray off the barnacles and spray off the bottom paint, spray off the gel coat, and where you wax it. Now, in the fall people rub. They take sandpaper or power sander and take the bottom paint off the boat, and where does the old varnish, the old copper paint, the old lead paint, the resin, everything from the boat, where does that go? Into the ground." He was right. Let's not add another 153 boats without cleaning the place up. The above comment is my own, and is not offered in any representative capacity and is based on my own knowledge and experience with the site. I am in favor of continued commercial - boat yard- port use, rather than an artsy shop and museum complex. It's a pity that the past owners have permitted the wharf, which enabled boats to unload passengers, lumber and coal, and take on passengers, oysters and potatoes, to atrophy, and cause New Suffolk to lose its identity as a Port, which was the sole purpose of the original underwater grant and the susequent development, only vestig~s~ of which remain. Respectfully, Rober~ T. Gol~l~a~ ~- Rol~r~ T. GoJIdm~ IvlAR 1 7 2005 ~. ~. .- I~ / L.?B LUCILLE FIELD GOODMAN PO Box 639 New Suffolk, New York 11956 March 16, 2005 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chair Southold Planning Board Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Board members: 2005 I have owned and lived in a home in New Suffolk for over twenty-five years, and am an active member of the New Suffolk Civic Association. Many of us are deeply concerned about the building of boat storage racks by Matt-a-Mar on the Bay in the New Suffolk boat basin area. We are asking that you consider the damage and destruction to the peace, safety and beauty of our little hamlet by the following: The scale of the project - too many boats and too many cars; The impact of so many boats on the water quality of the Bay; The height of the racks (35 feet) which would loom over the surrounding properties; The unsightliness and obstruction of views, not only to New Suffolkers, but to the many visitors to the hamlet and its public beach and boating facilities; The effect on parking for Legends, shops, post office, etc. and on local streets; The proposed demolition of the last original building (the historic barn) on site; The prevention of eventual reconstruction of the General Store & Post Office; Inadequate restrooms and pump-out facilities. We know you are dedicated to the preservation, history, and protection of our unique hamlet, and will give your thoughtful attention to our concerns. Sincerely, NORTH F'ORK E:NVIRONME:NTAL COUNCIL, INC. Rt. 25 at Love Lane, PO Box 799, Mattituck, NY 11952 Tel.: 631-298-8880 Fax: 631-298-4649 nfecl@optonline.net www.nfecl.org March 15, 2005 Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chair Southold Town Planning Board PO Box 1179 Southold, New York Dear Madame Chairperson, The first condition of the Henry Raynor proposal for development of a boat-storage facility in New Suffolk is, of course, the most obviously bad for the community - the size. It is too large for the area in terms of numbers of boats, in terms of height, and in terms of area to be used. One must consider, for instance, the added height of the boats themselves atop the already built (legitimate) thirty-five feet. It is not NFEC's business to comment loudly on aesthetics. But we are concerned, in light of the size of the plan, about traffic and the quality of the air in that area of the hamlet. The Planning Board must estimate in some reasonable way the number of cars which may be present (there could be more than one car per boat) and at what times they are likely to be at the site. These estimates must keep in mind the cars in the area in which diners are using and how all of this traffic may commingle or create gndlock. What will this mean for the residents in the nearby area? The engines of the boats will also create pollution and noise. We are also wondering whether the boats will be serviced at this facility - which, if so, - would create more concerns. We have concerns about how the water might be contaminated with the various chemicals necessary for boat cleaning, repair, etc. There will be impact on the water simply because of the boats being launched there - particularly those with engines. The Planning Board must consider carefully whether the building of any of this facility will require actual disturbance of the bay bottom in that area. This question has come up before and we believe that it has been agreed that it is best not to disturb the bottom because of the probability of contaminants resting there (because of former uses there) getting moved through the water to unknown destinations. But the Planning Board should be certain of what might be part of the project. Another major concern is that, so far, there is nothing noted for space for a pump-out facility. Again, water contamination is our big worry. New Suffolk has been an important place for all of the long history of the North Fork of Long Island. We want to be certain that it may continue to be a healthy community for those living in and visiting it. Yours truly, Gwynh Schroeder Executive Director MAR 7 2005 a non-profit organization for the preservation of~; Sea:air and quality oftl[f~ .... j printeP on ~'~ rec¥cleO paper Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse Chairman, Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Woodhouse, 2005 My husband and I live in New Suffolk and have owned a home on the comer of Main and 2nd Streets for 14 years. We pumhased our home because we loved the charm and community spirit of the hamlet. The people of New Suffolk are very aware of our bay and the impact that lifestyle has on it's fragile ecosystem. We are also very proud of the historic value of New Suffolk. Therefore, you can imagine our concern regarding the proposed Matt-a-Mar on the Bay Marina. New Suffolk is a small community and the proposed Marina disregards the fragility of the surrounding waters and the town itself. The plan allows no accommodations for rest rooms for boat owners or pump out facilities. We can only imagine what will happen to the pristine waters of the bay with that many boats discharging waste and fuel. Putting in tall metal boat rack structures will completely alter and destroy the views particularly along First Street. What an eyesore. Demolishing an historic barn in order to place ugly metal structures seems thoughtless. The racks are too high, the number of boats and the lack of parking are all unacceptable as the plan now appears. We hope to replace our historic General Store/Post Office building on it's original site. This Marina plan will prevent that. Simply put, this project is without thought or regard for lifestyle in a small historic hamlet. Main Street and the surrounding streets are already under traffic stress because of a very popular restaurant/bar, Legends. New Suffolk also has a public beach area that adds a parking nightmare for the local residents who have to deal with illegal parking during the summer season. This proposed Marina project as it appears now will create absolute chaos for a peaceful and charming village that is already pushed to the limits of patience with traffic issues and our concern for the bay and the wildlife who depend on the bay for survival. As a New Suffolk homeowner and Southold taxpayer we are asking you to take a critical view of the impact that this proposed Marina will have on the environment of New Suffolk and it's residents. Please keep us informed of any town meetings or developments regarding this project as we will appreciate having our concerns heard. Sincerely, Mr. & Mrs. A. D. Uterano 17095 Main Street PO Box 435 New Suffolk, NY 11956 March 15, 2005 gAR 1 7 2005 Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse Chairman, Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 22971 Re: Matt-a-Mar On The Bay Boat Storage Racks Dear Ms. Woodhouse and Members of the Planning Board, I am writing to express the concerns of the New Suffolk Civic Association Board of Trustees as well as those of many New Suffolk residents with whom I have spoken regarding the proposed installation of 17 Boat Storage Racks, 10 boat slips, a 1389 square foot boat shop, and 185 parking spaces in an area that is considered one that defines what the Hamlet of New Suffolk is. The waterfront is precious and treasured by all who live here. It would be wrong to turn it into an industrial park of boat storage racks viewable from beaches and homes all around Cutchogue Harbor. The installation of these boat racks will invite people who have no regard for this small village, its beaches and waterways. These same beaches and waterways are already deluged with people who have all to clearly demonstrated their total disdain for clean water, beaches and roads by the amounts of garbage they throw from their boats and cars and leave on the beach when they leave at the end of the dav. To sa).' that the scale of this project is way too large is understating this particular concern considerably. There are many safety and logistical issues involved in putting in a vast number of storage racks over thirty feet high to accommodate well over 150 boats. There are environmental issues concerning the number of people, boats, and cars that would flood our waterfront, which already faces enormous parking problem in season because of the many people using the Town Boat Ramp and Town Beach. In reviewing the plans, the NSCA sees many potential problems that will ruin everything that has brought people to the New Suffolk area for decades and we urge the Planning Board to discourage the owners of Matt-A-Mar on the Bay from proceeding with this plan in any way, shape or form. NEW SUFFOLK CIVIC ASSOCIATION, IN(;. POST OFFICE BOX 642 NEW SUFFOI.K, NY 11956 The New Suffolk Civic Association has expressed interest in meeting with the owners of Matt-A-Mar On the Bay, to no avail. We are planning a public meeting for New Suffolk Residents to come and hear what some alternative might be and we would welcome the attendance of any Planning Board members who might be inclined to attend. If we can be of any assistance in trying to make the existing marina more functional, we would be glad to do so. Feel free to contact me at 734-7503. Sincerely, TM ~ ~,.,: t ..... .x,~ Lauren Granl, President New Suffolk Civic Association 1275 First Street ~ / P.O. Box 304 New Suffolk, NY 11956 March 13, 2005 Dear Ms. Woodhouse, This letter is written in response to the proposed boat storage racks by Matt-A-Mar on the Bay, New Suffolk. We live on the corner of First and Orchard Streets, and therefore will be directly affected by this development. We bought our house in 1992, and are relative newcomers, but have seen "downtown" New Suffolk change drastically in these years. I'm often reminded of Joni Mitchell's song, "They paved paradise and put up a parking lot." New Suffolk is a tiny hamlet with narrow streets and it is increasingly becoming the "Grand Central Station" of the North Fork. For its size, and number of businesses, we see an enormous amount of traffic. Beer trucks that come down Orchard Street and make the turn on First Street are really just too large for the small roads. There is an entire block that is used as a parking lot. Beach goers and boaters often park along First Street and walk to the beach, and drop boats on the ramp, without permits. Garbage containers which should be enclosed when not in use are left open. Capacity rules are not enforced. There is no noise ordinance on the books, therefore there is little police can do to monitor noise abuse. These issues are not addressed now because of lack of personnel. I cannot imagine what life will be like if boat racks are installed, increasing traffic, pollution, and congestion in this hamlet. We do not have the roads or space to accommodate the numbers of people this project would bring into this community. If the beauty of New Suffolk is destroyed for profit by a few, we will all suffer, not only New Suffolk residents, but everyone on the North Fork. This kind of development is not good for the tourist industry, it is not good for the people in the community, it is only good for the owners and developers of these businesses. After the money is made, they will be gone to secluded, gated, communities, and we will be left holding the bag. Sincerely, Arlen. e and Frank Castellano 4370 New Suffolk Road New Suffolk, N.Y. 11956-0261 March 10, 2005 Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse Chairman, Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall P. O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Dear Ms. Woodhouse, 1 reside in New Suffolk and recently became aware of plans to build boat storage facilities by Matt-a-Mar on the Bay in the boat basin area of New Suffolk. I am strongly urging you and the other Planning Board members to deny approval to build these racks for a number of reasons: The scale of the project is very large and it would draw many more boats and cars to our hamlet. The volume of traffic, as well as the speed at which many non-hamlet individuals drive through our roadways, would be an increased safety hazard to the residents. · The number of boats has a definite impact on the water quality in the bay. · The racks are too high and would certainly dwarf the neighborhood. Additionally, they are unsightly and do not fit the character of our historic downtown. · The storage facility will block the views of the bay along Front Sweet and deny residents a lovely and peaceful waterfront experience. The Project would demolish the historic barn which is the last original building on site. This runs contrary to the Town of Southold's efforts to preserve as much oftbe entire area's historical nature as possible. · The loss of parking and dumpster space for Legends creates problems for surrounding streets and residents. Lastly, New Suffolk residents have purposely chosen to purchase or build homes in the hamlet because of the charm and quality of life it offers. Iftbe project is approved I believe it would negatively impact the value of our homes and the desire of future buyers to invest in the hamlet. Yours truly, Rose Ann Bums March lOth, 2005 Martha F. Baker 1600 Grathwohl Road New Suffolk, NY 11956-0009 Jerilyn Woodhouse Chairman, Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 Re: BOAT STORAGE RACKS IN NEW SUFFOLK Ms Woodhouse, This is the image of how I perceive a Spring, Summer or Fall day on the waterfront in New Suffolk, if the boat racks were to be erected as proposed. 0600 Three guys from 'up west' Tom, Dick, and Harry and their families, come barreling down New Suffolk Avenue onto Main Street into New Suffolk, to access their boats for a day on the bay. *They noisily unload their coolers and gear and park their SUV's in the lighted parking lot * Everyone visits the restroom -- 10 to 12 flushes; coffee cups, breakfast wrappers and newspapers into the barrels; don't forget the family pooches. (Later that day, the garbage truck and honey wagon haul away the dumpster and pump out the sewage holding tanks. Oh, and did we tell you: There's a pooper-scooper regulation in this town? The locals will remind you as they pick up the dog waste from their lawns.) 0615 Tom, Dick and Harry each loudly instruct the forklift operator which is his craft to be staged and launched. *the fork lift emits noisy blasts of black diesel exhaust into the air and drips fuel, hydraulic fluid, and crankcase oil on the ground *the boats, bilges splashing from the movement, drip their own fuel, oil and lubricants on the ground (The next rain flushes this greasy mess into the harbor and it eventually finds its way in to the bay. The fish slowly die out and leave the bay as the returning sport fishermen complain about their lousy catches.) O63O Once the boats are launched-- *start the engines *rev the engines *idle the engines · ..until all are aboard and off they go into the bay. Very few of today's mariners have taken a "voluntary" marine safety and courtesy course, so they: * don't know the "rules of the road" * aren't familiar with the local waters and/or have a chart * can't deal with the simplest of emergencies (From the next creek over, the Old Cove Yacht Club's fleet of tiny sailboats - Sunfish, Opti's, etc. - optimistically enter the harbor, skippered by the local community's newest and youngest sailors. As a constant string of power boats leave and enter the marina, Old Cove instructors nervously dart here and there, protecting their brood and courteously shooing the powerboaters away. These adrenaline- and alcohol-rushed "SU¥-drivers-cum-power-boat-captains" are oblivious to the effects of their wakes and of the dangers they impose on small sailing craft, which spells trouble for our young sailors.) When the boats return later in the day, the same activities start all over again, as the boats are hoisted up to the boat racks after wash downs. High pressure washing erodes anti fouling paint and the toxic chemicals are absorbed into the groundwater. Now, multiply this scenario times the number of boats stored on the racks per day and the result is offensive, noisy, smelly and polluting. This is NOT in keeping with the desires of not only the residents of New Suffolk, but of those from neighboring towns who come and enjoy the tranquility of our little waterfront hamlet. My recommendation would be to repair and make safe the existing docks and reinforce the sea wall to protect the harbor adjacent to the old Galley Ho restaurant. Reserve a few boat slips for the patrons of our harborfront and charge them by the hour. Landscape the area around the waterfront. In the old Galley Ho building, lease a small marine store and open a seasonal take-out lunch shop window with picnic tables. Fix up the Legend's parking strip with a new fence, charge them more rent for the property. Thank you for listening. Yours sincerely, BETTY M. BAKER APT. 315 · 1500 BRECKNOCK ROAD · GREENPORT, NY · 11944 March 10, 2005 Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chair Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: I was dismayed to learn of plans to erect a large boat storage facility on the waterfront in New Suffolk across from the Legends restaurant. Not only would it impinge on the view from what is a favorite restaurant of mine and many others, but it is yet another unsightly obstruction on our diminishing shoreline. It would be an affront to the citizens of New Suffolk, but more serious would be the increased vehicular and boat traffic further polluting the surrounding water and air. I do hope your Board will not approve this ill-advised project. Sincerely yours, March 10, 2005 Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse Chairman, Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: I am a resident of 1200 First Street in New Suffolk. Our residence is only about 400 feet from the proposed site of Matt-a-Mar on the Bay (New Suffolk). I am part of 2 committees formed by the citizens of New Suffolk regarding this issue. We have several concerns regarding this monumental structure to be built on the waterfront in such a historic North Fork community. The project includes building a substantial boat storage rack approximately 32 feet high and then placing a boat at 32 feet, taking the height to at least 42 feet. The scale of this project will be overwhelming to the size of this community and dwarf the neighborhood. This rack will hold about 130 boats, which then will bring large amounts of traffic into an already tight community. This area cannot accommodate this amount of cars. Not only will it create congestion, but also it will block the views of our downtown waterfront from Main Street and First Street. I spoke with a representative of a company called Coastal Marine International about the depth at which the structure has to be placed into the ground. They state that the soil conditions can affect the building, bulkhead and launch areas. As many before have researched the site, the soil in this area is highly contaminated by oils and gases. Digging into the ground at the depth structurally necessary could spread the contamination considerably especially so close to the bay. Even if a shallow "spread foundation" were built for the 42 foot structure, this would create a serious danger of collapsing due to the high winds in the area. Bringing such an overwhelming project into the historic New Suffolk community will ultimately be a first step in the deterioration in the North Fork Charm. Our community as a whole is open to use the space commercially, but proportionate to the size of the community as well as enhancing the aesthetic of the community. I hope you will consider our plea not to proceed with the overwhelming scale of such a project. Sincerely, Gary Osborne 1200 First Street New Suffolk, NY 11956 917-861-3014 Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse Chairperson Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Dear Chairperson, My wife and I purchased property in New Suffolk because we fell in love with this charming jewel of the North Fork. However, we are very concemed over the proposal to build boat-launching facilities in our hamlet. It is very upsetting to think that such an imprudent eyesore could threaten our small community, proposed by MATT-a-MARR ON THE BAY. It seems that such a colossal project would deprive us of seeing vistas we have grown to love, and result in the loss of shore access. All of us know from experience how fragile our bays actually are; we have seen the loss of scallops and surprising reductions of most of our fish, oysters, clams and crabs as well. More cars, more boats, more gasoline and oil will cause more harm to environmental conditions, which seem to be on the edge as is. We speak for ourselves, but we are far fi'om alone in our community in sharing these feelings and other issues as well. We realize that changes are inevitable, but when they occur, they should be planned around the community's needs, and kept to harmonize and enhance the area. Thank you for your time in reading this and for your consideration on this matter of concern. Respectfully, Ms Jerilyn Woodhouse Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 March 8, 2005 Dear Ms Woodhouse, My husband and I are writing to you to let you know of our deep concern regarding the application by Mat A Mar Marina on the Bay to build boat racks which could accommodate in excess of 150 boats and are over 130 feet high in the boat basin area of the New Suffolk waterfront. We are also concerned that the plan calls for 185 parking spaces. We believe this project will destroy life in New Suffolk and at the New Suffolk waterfront as we know it today and as residents have enjoyed it for years. It will bring traffic which is way out of proportion for what this small community can absorb. With only 300 residents, how can New Suffolk accommodate nearly 200 new parking spaces? The Bay is already very congested with boats in this area and 150 additional boats will make the situation worse, especially so close to the New Suffolk town beach. The quality of the water for swimming, water sports and fish and wildlife will deteriorate. At the heart of New Suffolk, this waterfront property is important for its vistas over the bay and the tranquil environment which characterizes the commtmity. It is a historical place and it should be preserved and developed in a way which recognizes its history, its environmental fragility and the concern of its residents. Mark and Diana Schwatka 520 George Road New Suffolk NY 11956 Thomas C. Samuels and Nancy L. Steelman 7092 New Suffolk Road New Suffolk, NY March 10, 2005 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Southold Town Planning Board PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Rez "MATT-a-MAR by the BAY" Apl~lication New Suffolk, NY Dear Ms. Woodhouse and Members of the Planning Board, Please note that we have serious concerns about the above referenced application to construct boat racks and parking on the old North Fork Shipyard site in the center of New Suffolk This project is inappropriate in scale, appearance and intensity of use. Though fulfilling a utilitarian purpose, it would give nothing back to New Suffolk, and would do much to erode the historic character of our beloved hamlet. From the earliest days of New Suffolk, this site was the focus of the life of the community. At the Goldsmith-Tuthill pier sailing ships took agricultural products to New York and beyond, and landed goods for the North Fork. The Holland submarines were docked here while being tested for the Navy. It was the site of the post office, general store, and several other buildings associated with the maritime history of New Suffolk. Over the last twenty+ years, at least th ree major projects by different developers have been proposed for this site, including condominiums, extensive marina expansions, and enlarged restaurants. Now comes a project for boat racks to hold 100+ boats. Like the previous applications, this project has serious problems that should prevent its approval by your board. We respectfully request that you consider the following concerns: The project is too large for its site and for New Suffolk. Boat racks on this scale might make sense on a concealed back lot at a larger facility (think Strong's Marine), not looming 35 feet over the main street of a historic village. To enclose them in a structure (think Port of Egypt) would be worse. To call such structures 'unsightly' would be an understatement. Will the Architectural Review Board be asked for its input, and will you independently consider the aesthetic impact of this project? 2. So many boats and cars concentrated on this small site will have a huge impact on the surrounding areas, both land and sea. Automobile traffic will erode the quality of life on our streets, and boat traffic the life of our harbor. On the basis of traffic alone, will you not require a significant cutback in the scale of this project? The project will exacerbate existing traffic problems in the hamlet. Legends currently leases a portion of the Matt-a-Mar site for parking and refuse storage. As it will no longer accommodate such parking, this project will create intolerable parking problems in downtown New Suffolk. Where will Legends patrons park, and where will their dumpster be located? Does this application represent all owner's complete intentions for the site? As other aspects of the property will remain unimproved, we would expect additional applications in future for work to the restaurant and marina. Will the Planning Board assure that this application is complete? As lead agent in this application, will you consider a positive declaration in the SEQRA process? There seem to be no provisions for sanitary facilities on the site; are none required by NYS Building Code? Where will the operators of all these boats go when they return from their trips on the bay? Similarly, is there no requirement for pump out facilities for boats in a marina? The surface water quality is at stake, as the federal estuary program and Bay-keeper have noted. Will you coordinate parallel approvals from the DEC, Trustees and Health Department, and ensure compliance with provisions of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Project? New Suffolk residents were traumatized by the loss of the general store and post office building, the heart of our hamlet, which burned to the ground in 1993. Since then, it has been a community objective to restore the building. We appreciate that this will be a complex and expensive endeavor, requiring all our commitment and resources, yet we believe it can be achieved. Unfortunately, the current proposal shows boat racks on the post office site, preventing that goal. It also shows the historic 'Houston Barn' demolished and replaced by boat racks. This SPLIA listed structure is the last original building on the site. Should it not be preserved, and the historic character of the site and New Suffolk respected? Thank you for your service on behalf of New Suffolk and the Town, Sincerely, cc: NSCA March 8, 2005 Dear Chairperson Woodhouse and Members of the Planning Board: Twenty years ago, my entire family (my father, husband, 2 young children, my sister, and brother-in-law) fell in love with a little town called New Suffolk, and we purchased a home on Fanning Road. The past 20 years have been great - better than great - but now something is threatening life as we know it in the hamlet that we love dearly. The proposed "Matt-A-Mar on the Bay" project is wrong for our town for many reasons: 1. Gigantic 3-tiered boat racks holding 153 boats and parking spaces for 180+ cars do not belong in the historic center of town. 2. A 45-foot high wall of boats on First & Main will effectively block out all views of our awesome waterfront. 3. Our historic barn will be no more. 4. The heart of our town will become one huge parking lot. 5. New Suffolk streets were never meant to handle this huge onslaught of traffic & CarS.. 6. Cyclists & hikers have long sought out our waterfront as a destination as they travel the North Fork.. They will avoid us like the plague. 7. The traffic will become intense on the weekends. All of us, especially our children, will be in danger. 8. Boat racks are ugly and definitely not appropriate for the heart of our hamlet.. We have seen them at Strong's Marina. This kind of project belongs "out of sight," "behind something," "out of the way," "in the hack ora creek,"...not in the center of town! 9. Due to overwhelming pollution of our waters (gas, oil. raw sewage) fi.om the boats should this project go forward, New Suffolk will never again receive the distinction of"Best Beach on the North Fork" in Dan's Papers. (The Matt-A-Mar proposal contains neither a restroom facility nor a pump out station in the proposed plan! HOW DARE THEY! This is horrifying and only solidifies that these "developers" of our waterfi.ont have no regard for the ramifications of their grandiose plans. They care not how their project will damage/destroy either the town or the surrounding hay area .... It's all about the money!) Unfortunately for all of us, our Dad/Grandfather passed away 2 years ago. He was 82 when he died. In the years before he died, his priorities were fishing, clamming, scallop!ng, and stopping this project. He was not a political person in Southold Town~,hOl h~ kn~ this was wrong for New Suffolk. The North Fork is the last special place on Long Island. Please don't let this project happen in Southold. Please don't allow these investors to rain a unique place. It's the only town like this on Long Island. Our town, our waterfront, is our life here. Please don't let them destroy it. Christopher Sandy Goodge Walter Goodge William J. Sullivan (posthumously) JAN-O4-1996 FAX 22:26 P.01 1'o: H~. tOoo~o~s~. From:, ' ' Fax #: ' · ~c,, - '4,.¢~o,, ~'o t6...,~O ' ~/~/o~ · ' ·Date: . Subject: Ho-~- A-.~O~.. Pages ~,u%~ ~ ~~ ' ~' ., Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chair Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 ,.~outhoid, NY 11971 Dear Madam Chairperson, What New Suffolk does not need is a plan such as Henry Raynor is proposing for boat storage on his property. There might be a worse plan but it is hard to imagine. New Suffolk is a very special place. Legends has helped to make more people aware of its specialness. Ugly boatracks are not what diners at the restaurant wan~t to look at. And, of course, the plan would take away parking for the visitors. The racks would overwhem this waterfront location - the size, height, numbers. And the cars? Gridlock on First Street, New Suffolk? And the air quality nearby all this engine-driver activity (car and boat)? And, as a long-time New Suffolker, I deplore the loss of an historic wood barn which would be ripped down to accomo- date metal and plastic! What about noise for the residents nearby? We're too small here to accomodate all those boat lifts, boat engines, cars all day and possibly at night on weekends - maybe all summer! This community should not bear such loss for one person's benefit - One person's financial benefit. There is no community gain in any of this proposal. Please consider marking a big "X" on Henry Raynor's plan. Sincerely yours, Page I BAR 1 0 2O05 ~' Brian A. Andrews 235 Wicks Rd., Box 207 New Suffolk, NY 11956 March 8, 2005 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Mat-a-Mar Boat Racks New Suffolk Dear Ms. Woodhouse: I have been informed of a proposal to erect boat racking structures upon the grounds of at Mat-a-Mar on the Bay in New Suffolk and for the reasons set forth herein wish to advise the Southold Planning Board of my opposition to such a plan. Firstly, the proposed project would be sited squarely in the heart of downtown New Suffolk. Effectively hiding or disguising a project of this scale with landscaping at this location is simply not possible. New Suffolk is a tiny hamlet and there is no doubt that the looming multi-tiered boat racking structures would visually dominate the downtown area. Mat-a-Mar's proposition that a grass strip will somehow alleviate their proposed blighting of our hamlet is both disingenuous and insulting. What is more, if this project is permitted, the vista of Cutchogue Harbor from First Street will be obstructed with large, unsightly industrial structures. Secondly, the proposed project is likely to create traffic and parking problems. The elimination of parking for Legends customers along the east side of First Street will most certainly create parking problems elsewhere in the hamlet. And the added vehicular traffic from a vastly increased number of Mat-a-Mar customers combined with the users of the nearby Town boat ramp and beach can only make matters especially problematic during the busy summer season. : i Finally, the proposed plan does not address the obvious need for restrooms to accommodate Mat-a-Mar customers nor does it include a pump-out facility. In light of these issues, it is clear that the proposed boat rack project will have a profoundly negative impact on the hamlet of New Suffolk. Accordingly, it is respectfully requested thatMat-azMar's application be denied Very t o s, Brian A. Andrews Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Southold Town Planning Board P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 ~9,2005 Re: Matt-a-Mar Marina on the Bay (New Suffolk) Dear Ms. Woodhouse and Planning Board Members: We have lived in New Suffolk for 50 years. When we came there were four fishing stations in New Suffolk (one was ours); that was a world ago. This is now primarily a residential community. It is certainly important to maintain its maritime heritage and some water dependent uses in a revitalization of this waterfront property, but this proposed development would overwhelm the hamlet center and destroy its ambience. The LWRP calls for "careful and limited development" of this property, citing in part the "high degree of environmental sensitivity," which would only be increased by the traffic of 153 boats -- both on the upland and in the bay. This proposal does not constitute "careful and limited development." Our main viewscape would be obliterated. The noise would be intolerable and the automobile traffic unmanageable. Safety for pedestrians in this walking hamlet would be compron~ised. The "Houston Barn" is on the SPLIA list; its demolition would be an insult to our history. It is not possible to screen seventeen 34' boat racks (44' adding the height of the top boats). The proposed landscaping is less than minimal. The loss of parking spaces for Legends is uncalled for. Although we have had some problems, we wish to accommodate -- not handicap -- this very attractive and highly successful restaurant. Cars would be everywhere in the surrounding neighborhood (30 is the least number). The total exposure of this waterfront property to storm damage from the northeast and southeast renders the safety of the proposed installation extremely problematical. There are homes and two businesses just across the street. This is not the way to preserve our marine heritage. There has to be a better way that would benefit the com[n_ ~um'ty ~ ~ell as the owners Please do not allow this to hap~h2 Sincerely, Joan B. Robbins and NtSwton Robbins 16995Main Street P. O. Box147 New Suffolk, NY 11956 (631) 734-6047 March 7, 2005 Town of Southold Planning Board Attn: Jeri Woodhouse, Chairperson Southold Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Re: Matt-A-Mar plan for New Suffolk harbor-front development Dear Ms. Woodhouse, My family and I are residents of New Suffolk. We are writing to you to express our extreme concern about the plans of Matt-A-Mar to build high boat storage racks between First St. and the harbor. We are not against commercial development of this area, but we are against the Matt-A-Mar plan for several reasons. A triple-high racking system for 153 powerboats directly along the town's main (not Main) street would be entirely out of scale with the surrounding establishments and would produce visual blight that would severely degrade the character of the town. This type of structure does not belong front and center in a low commercial impact town such as New Suffolk. Allowing such a density of powerboats would dramatically increase noise, air and water pollution in the community. Outboard motors are notorious for leaking oil and gas, both during normal operation and fueling. With so many boats, the fueling operation at the marina would be very active. The main New Suffolk beach is right around the comer from the marina location and during a rising tide these gas-slicked waters would be swept right along the main beach and other Jackson St. beaches. As New Suffolk is not a powerboating community (sailboats far outnumber powerboats at the NS Shipyard slips and in the harbor), most visitors would be arriving by car, adding significant traffic to the streets via which many families with children (including ours) walk to the beaches. There are few sidewalks in the town to help separate and protect pedestrians from car t~affic. Already the number of cars and trucks with trailered boats that come barreling down Jackson St. from the boat ramp is dangerous. As boating and drinking is a known frequent concurrence, I hate to think about lots more tipsy boaters heading home around the same time my family and other families are walking home t~om the beach. I strongly urge you to mm down this plan that would negatively impact this community. Thank you for your time, your consideration, as well as your public service. Sincerely, _ y . 645 Jackson St. New Suffolk, NYl1956 Ms. Elaine Romagnoli 1230 First Street New Suffolk, New York 11956 Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse Chairman, Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 storage racks by Matt-a-Mar on the Bay. Dear Ms. Woodhouse, I am greatly concemed with the possibility that Matt-a-Mar On the Bay will win approval by the planning board for boat Storage racks. I feel the project is too large: too many boats, too many cars. Racks are unattractive and will block the view of the bay along first street. Loss of parking and dumpster space for Legends creates Parking problems for the rest of the neighborhood. Noise pollution increased. No accommodations for rest rooms for boat owners No pump-out facility Sincerely, ~ aine Romagnoli March, 05,2005 March 6. 2005 Ms. Jerilw~ Woodhouse Chairman, Southold To,,~n Planning Board Sonthold To'~,n l iall PO Box II 79 Southold. NY 11971 Dear Southold Town Planning Board: Tile purpose of this letter is to express our grave concerns about the building of the boat storage racks by Matt-a-Mar on tile Bay m the boat basin area of New Suffolk As parents of two small children, we believe this project will introduce too many boats and cars to our hamlet ultimately compromising their safety In addition, part of the allure of the purchasing a borne in New Sufl'olk was the picturesque setting of the downtown area and the 'dews of the bay These proposed racks v, ill destroy tile beauty of this unique community and ,~x ill no doubt adversely afl'ecl the value of New Sufl'olk residential real estate Because of the above - and so many other environmental and health-related concerns, we are adamantly opposed to this prQiect in its currenl l:orm We hope you decide to cancel or greatly limit the ambition of this boat storage rack project fbr the good of the greater Next, Suffiqk community Ve~ sincerely ~OUl-S. ~and John Spiegel 495 Jackson Street NewSuflblk. NY 11056 P.O. BOX 623 NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 March 8, 2005 Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse Chairman, Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Woodhouse, This letter is to express my concern about the planned building of boat storage racks by Matt-a-Mar on the Bay (New Suffolk) in the boat basin area of New Suffolk. The plans show a project which is completely out of scale with its surroundings; the boat racks are much too big, not only in height, but in length also, and would house a number of boats which is out of sync with the character and topography of New Suffolk. In addition the number of parking spaces is ridiculously high, and there does not appear to be any accommodation for rest rooms for boat owners (Legends cannot be expected to open their facilities), and, more importantly, there is no pump-out facility shown. My understanding is that even on commercial/business plans, 20% of the site is required to be offset for landscaping. I don't think that by any stretch of the imagination can an area equal to twenty per cent be accounted for under 'landscaping' on these plans. 1 am also distressed to see that the project proposed to demolish a historic barn, the last original building on the site. The owners have shown a distressing lack of concern for, and awareness of the history of New Suffolk in presenting this plan for Planning Board approval. While I understand the owners' rights to develop their property, I feel they would do well to look carefully at old photos of the waterfront, and scale back this project to a size that would be acceptable to the community. I urge you to take these concerns into consideration when you are reviewing the site plan, and to send it back for substantial revision and down-sizing. ,~erely, Prtmella M. Brashich v ~.....~ P. O. Box 303 New Suffolk, NY 11956 7 March 2005 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chair Southold Planning Board Southold Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: Many of us in New Suffolk are deeply concerned about the boat racks and parking facilities that have been proposed for the New Suffolk waterfront. We believe that the scale of the project is seriously incompatible with preserving the historic center of New Suffolk. Not only will there be a significant deleterious effect on our prized viewscape, but it would render an irreversible change to the character of the hamlet and lead to unprecedented problems of traffic, parking, waste disposition, and general overuse ora delicate and rather small area. We do not oppose development the New Suffolk waterfront, but we do not believe it is possible to justify any purely commercial development that would be of such a magnitude to be efficient for the developer. It may of interest to the Planning Board that a committee is now working on alternative plans that can lead to a successful accommodation of development with the needs of the community. Yours sin;~ Michael A. Simon. Post Office Box 76 350 Oak Road New Suffolk, NY 11956 March 7, 2005 Ms. ]erilyn Woodhouse Chairperson, Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Post Office Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: Please use your influence to tone down the overwhelming scale of the boat storage racks proposed by Matt-a-Mar on the Bay to be built at the boat basin in New Suffolk. It is much too big--TALL! - for our tiny hamlet. It would dwarf the neighborhood and completely overpower the waterfront area. That view to the sea would be blocked for virtually everyone in the hamlet. Our community does not wish our seaside vista to be of shrink wrap! You can't let the owner's greed and grandiosJty ruin our little town. Let him scale down h s project to suit the neighborhood!! Thank you for your efforts. Susan Pope March 7, 2005 David Dingle Box 56 New Suffolk NY 11956 631-734-6767 Co917-806-6767 dingle0925@aol.com To: Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chairman Southhold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 Re: Matt-a-Mar project in New Suffolk boat basin Dear Ms. Woodhouse My wife, Susan Grathwohl Dingle and I have had a family history in New Suffolk that goes back 3 generations. I am writing to express our negative feelings about the above project as it just doesn't relate to this small hamlet of 337 people in an appropriate scale. The racks, as projected, would be unseemly and dwarf the neighborhood. They would not be in keeping with the downtown scene (a small one) of New Suffolk. No accomodations have bean made for rest rooms for the boat owners and I believe that your Board will have to snswer to the overall effect on the water quality in the bay. I could go on with a list of reasons why this project should not be considered but if you think of a small historic town with a limited waterfront presence and the idea of a project like this.....you are permitting commercial developer interests to destroy the tranquilly of the town. Please do not have your Board encourage this project. Sincerely, David Dingle Mr. James A. Baker III 1600 Grathwohl Road, P.O. Box 9 New Suffolk, NY 11956 March 7, 2005 Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Reference: Planned "Matt-a-Mar-by-the-Bay' Marina Project in New Suffolk Dear Ms. Woodhouse, I'm writing you today to express my concerns over the referenced planned "boat storage rack" project in the boat basin area at the end of Main St., (sometimes referred to as New Suffolk Ave.) in the hamlet of New Suffolk. My primary concerns are the visual impacts of this project, the problems that will arise from the increase in traffic generated by this new marina operation, and the potential for pollution from the operation of this facility. I believe this project is fundamentally incompatible with the character and nature of present-day New Suffolk, and it certainly does not fit in with my vision of how the development of our hamlet should evolve, a vision that I share with the majority of New Suffolk residents with whom I've spoken. BACKGROUND, SETTING, CURRENT SITUATION Our hamlet is primarily a residential community, with several small businesses interspersed among neighborhoods of single family homes. The adverse impacts (e.g. visual, traffic, pollution, noise) of the existing businesses are relatively small and are spread out over the area of the hamlet. The facilities proposed by this project will forever change the character of our hamlet's downtown and waterfront areas and will introduce an unacceptable level of vehicle congestion into our relatively quiet hamlet. I loosely define the downtown area of the hamlet, where this project is proposed to be located, as the entire length of First Street, running from Orchard Street on the north, to the Town Beach, on the south. The existing businesses in this area are located in several old, functional, one- and two- story buildings. There are residences located in between most of the commercial buildings. The streets in this area are narrow and the sidewalks, where they exist, are not in a good state of repair. The largest year-round business in the area is the restaurant "Legends" and it currently generates the most adverse impacts in the area, primarily in the form of traffic, parking, and occasionally, noise. In summer, the activities at the town beach and boat-launching ramp generate significant traffic congestion in the area. The existing marina and fishing station activities, although relatively small, further exacerbate this seasonal congestion. ISSUES First, and foremost, this project is architecturally incompatible with our hamlet's downtown area. Its large warehouse-like boat rack structures will give the appearance of a factory, which is completely out of character with the look and feel of the existing buildings. In addition, the parking lot necessary to support this business will cover a significant portion of the downtown area. As a result of this project, the views of Cutchogue Harbor, Robins Island, and Peconic Bay, which defme this community, will be almost completely blocked, and when seen, these visual elements will be marred by parked cars and industrial-looking buildings. Some residents living along First Street will lose their waterfront views and all residents will be faced with an unpleasant scene of steel framework and parked vehicles. Residential property values will certainly decrease as a result. Although I recognize that current zoning does allow for the combination of residential and commercial functions in portions of this area, I don't necessarily agree with this. Secondly, the nature and size of the proposed project will make it a significant generator of vehicular traffic. The customers of this facility will be arriving from the west, along New Suffolk Avenue, and from the north, using New Suffolk Road. Both of these narrow, two-lane country roads are in a relatively poor state of repair. The traffic from both these routes must drive through the hearts of New Suffolk's residential neighborhoods on their way to the proposed expanded marina. The Town of Southold is already addressing traffic density and excessive speed problems within our hamlet. I understand that the parking area across from the restaurant "Legends' will be eliminated by this project. Parking is already a year-round issue in this area, due to the popularity of this business. During busy times, parked vehicles spill over into the streets (and frequently, the front lawns) of adjacent neighborhoods. If this is a problem with the current parking configuration, it will become a nightmare if these parking spaces are removed. Daily congestion would become the norm in this area from noon until midnight and in summer, the risk of vehicle-pedestrian accidents will significantly increase. Given the size of this project, the traffic from marina users, employees, and delivery trucks will approximately triple in volume during the peak three to four months of its operating season. This latter category of vehicles brings with it an entirely new set of issues ~- safety, health, and environment. Hazardous materials (HAZMAT) such as fuel, lubricants, solvents, paints, and battery acid, to name a few, will be transported through our residential neighborhoods in increased volumes. An accident with a HAZMAT carrying vehicle puts our residents at risk of injury from a direct exposure and also creates the potential of long-term neighborhood pollution from a HAZMAT spill. In addition, this industrial operation will generate hazardous wastes, which must be transported out of the area through these same neighborhoods. The issues I've discussed so far are mostly acute in nature, but the operation of a large boat-rack marina would create many chronic problems, such as noise, environmental pollution, and natural resource damages. Stormwater runoff from the paved areas would introduce sediments, petroleum products, and trash into the fragile coastal, marine environment and would also create localized erosion. Bone fish and shellfish resources are already declining in Peconic Bay due to man-made activities and this project will surely contribute to the further demise of these valuable commercial and recreational resources. Maintenance activities on the marina's equipment, as well as on customers' boats would mean handling large volumes of the HAZMATs listed above, carrying with it the risk of spills and unauthorized dumping. Recreational boating activities generate large volumes of trash, as users return from a day's boating with food packaging and drink containers. Even if everyone responsibly used on-site refuse containers, there would be an increased volume of trash-hauling truck traffic through our neighborhoods. The sanitary sewage from both customers and employees must be properly disposed and given this project's waterfront location, it is doubtful that an adequate septic and leaching field system could be constructed to meet current health codes. If a holding tank system is the solution, then further increases in heavy truck traffic would occur, along with the risk of spills. Finally, the increased boat traffic on the Great Peconic Bay will not only adversely affect the fragile coastal marine environment, it will also contribute to the boating safety issues in this already crowded marine recreational area. RECOMMENDATIONS Given this property is legitimately zoned for business, it would be foolish for me to believe nothing at all should be done with it. In considering a way forward, however, any proposed commercial development must be done in a sensitive and limited way, taking into account the needs of the hamlet of New Suffolk and its residents. This means that only lean, esthetically pleasing designs should be accepted for approval, instead of those that simply try to maximize the profit from every square foot of the property. In the long te~m, to accomplish this, the Town of Southold should approach hamlet waterfront development in much the same way as fa~ roland preservation, even to the point of purchasing some or all of the development rights of this precious resource. I believe the citizens of this town would be willing to pay for the preservation of the nautical character of their community, instead of giving it over to unconstrained development. Hamlets such as New Suffolk should be able to ultimately decide what type and level of development is appropriate for their own waterfronts. In the short term, until such a hamlet waterfront preservation program can be established, you should not approve this referenced project in its current configuration, because: 1) it will adversely impact the quality of life of the residents of the hamlet of New Suffolk, and 2) it will change forever the character of New Suffolk from a quiet, historical, maritime community into an industrial park. If the proponent wishes to revise their approach, then they should receive guidance as to how to approach such a project in this area. By way of closing, I'd like you to know that I grew up here (Southold High School, Class of 1964) and have recently returned to the North Fork after a thirty-year career with the military. Although officially "retired," I know I can make a contribution to my hometown, using the knowledge IYe gained from a career as an environmental professional. Although I'm not surprised at the amount of development I've seen since I left, I am disappointed in the direction some of this development has taken. I believe I can help residents, developers, and local governments see the long- term implications of their proposed decisions, through the eyes of someone who both loves his local community and has the training and experience to evaluate the engineering and environmental impacts and provide workable, mutually- acceptable, compromise solutions. Thank you for your kind consideration in this matter. Please feel free to contact me at (631) 734-5121 if you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter further. Sincer~,~, Jam~.¢. (Jim) Baker III Cc: New Suffolk Civic Association