The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFishers Island Yacht Club James F~ King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen Bob Ghos±o, Jr. Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK, TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND POSSIBLE REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. INSPECTION SCHEDULE ,/ Pre-construction, hay bale line 1st day of construction ¼ constructed Project complete, compliance inspection. BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK PERMIT NO. 7102 DATE: MAY 20~ 2009 , ISSUED TO: FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB PROPERTY ADDRESS: CENTRAL AVE.~ FISHERS ISLAND SCTM#10-1-9 ~ AUTHORIZATION Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 and/or Chapter 111 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the meeting held on May 20. 2009 in consideration of application fee in the sum of $250.00 paid by Fishers Island Yacht Club and subject to the Terms and Conditions as stated in the Resolution, the Southold Town Board of Trustees authorizes and permits the following: Wetland Permit to dredge 13,000 cy. of sandy silt with a 1' over-dredge allowance of 6,000 cy. over 145,000 sr. by clamshell b~icket, and as depicted on the Plans prepared Docko, Inc. dated April 22, 2009. This is not an authorization for open water disposal of the dredge spoil in New York waters. IN WITNESS WHEI~EOF, the said Board of Trustees hereby canse~ its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date. TERMS AND CONDITIONS The Permittee, Fishers Island Yacht Club located at Central Ave.. Fishers Island. NY, as part of the consideration for the issuance of the Permit does understand and prescribe i6 the following: That the said Board of Trustees and the Town of Southold are released from any and all damages, or claims for damages, of suits arising directly or indirectly as a result of any operation performed pursuant to this permit, and the said Pennittee will, at his or her own expense, defend any and all such suits initiated by third parties, and the said Permittee assumes full liability with respect thereto, to the complete exclusion of the Board of Trustees of the Town of $outhold. That this Permit is valid for a period of 24 months, which is considered to be the estimated time required to complete the work involved, but should cimumstances warrant, request for an extension may be made to the Board. at a later date. That this Permit should be retained indefinitely, or as long as the said Permittee wishes to maintain the structure or project involved, to provide evidence to anyone concerned that authorization was originally obtained. That thc work involved will be subject to the inspection and approval of the Board or its agents, and non-compliance with the provisions of the originating application may be cause for revocation of this Permit by resolution of the said Board. That there will be no unreasonable interfe~'encc with navigation as a result of the work herein authorized. That there shall be no interference with the right of the public to pass and repass along the beach between high and low water marks. That if future operations of the Town of Southold require the removal and/or alterations in the location of the work herein authorized, or if, in the opi.nion of the Board of Trustees, the work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to free navigation, the said Permittee will be required, upon due notice, to remove or alter this work project herein stated without expenses to the Town of Southold. That the said Board will be notified by the Permittee of the completion of the work authorized. That the Permittee will obtain all other permits and consents that may be requi~.d supplemental to this permit, which may be subject to revoke upon failure to obtain same. James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr. Town Hall Annex 54375 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF $OUTHOLD May 20, 2009 Keith Neilson, P.E. Docko, Inc. P.O. Box 421 Mystic, CT 06355 RE: FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB CENTRAL AVE., FISHERS ISLAND SCTM#10-1-9 Dear Mr. Neilsen The Board of Town Trustees took the following action dudng its regular meeting held on Wed., May 20, 2009 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Docko, Inc. on behalf of FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance, application dated February 17, 2009, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on May 20, 2009, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted conceming this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in ChaPter 275 of the Southold Town Code, and, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees deems the action to be Consistent with the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program pursuant to Chapter 268-5 of the Southold Town Code, and, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approve the application of FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB to dredge 13,000 cy. of sandy silt with a 1' over-dredge allowance of 6,000 cy. over 145,000 sf. by clamshell bucket, and as depicted on the plans prepared by Docko, Inc. dated April 22, 2009, and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this is not an authorization for open water disposal Of the dredge spoil in New York waters. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date the permit is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the dat~e of this notification. Inspections are required at a fee of $50.00 per inspection. (See attached schedule.) Fees: None Very truly yours, Jam, --. King, Pre Board of Trustees JFK:lms DAVID A. PATERSON GOVERNOR STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE ONE COMMERCE PLAZA 99 WASHINGTON AVENUE ALBANY, NY 12231-0001 LORRAINE A. CORT~S-V.~,ZQUEZ SECRETARY OF STATE May 1, 2009 ~AY' 6 2009 Mr. Keith Neilson, P.E. Docko, Inc. P.O. Box 421 Mystic, CT 06355 Re: F-2009-0140 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/New York District Permit Application - Fishers Island Yacht Club - proposed replacement, modification and addition to existing dock configuration, proposed dredging of 13,000cy of material with allowable overdredge of approximately 6,000cy for a total of approximately 19,000cy of material to be disposed of at the open-water New London Disposal Site (NLDS) in Long Island Sound (LIS), Town of Southold,Suffolk County. Received Federal Consistency Assessment Form - Began Review - Request for Additional Information Dear Mr. Neilson: The Department of State began its review of the above-referenced activity on February 12, 2009. However, pursuant to 15 CFR Part 930.58, the following additional information and data is necessary to enable the Department of State to adequately assess the consistency of the proposed activity with the New York Coastal Management Program: According to the Dredged material suitability determination made by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) New England District, a portion of the sediment proposed to be removed (represented by sample #1) does not meet the criteria for unconfined open-water disposal, as it contains elevated mercury levels measured at four (4) times the NLDS level. Policy 6.2 of the Town of Southold LWRP states: Protect and restore Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats. ~'ishers Island is included in Reach 10 of the LWRP. There are three (3) Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats (SCFWH) located within Reach I0 and in close proximity to both the Fishers Island Yacht Club, and the NLDS. They are identified as The Race, Fishers Island Beaches and Hungry Point Islands. The Race, in particular, is described in the habitat narrative as representative of a "physical environment unusual to New York State. Significant concentrations of many fish forage in this area, including striped bass, bluefish, tautog, summer flounder, and scaup." The race is a nationally renowned sportfishing area, an extensive recreational fishery area, and supports a lobster commercial fishery of national significance. WWW.DOS.STATE.NY,US · E-MAIL:INFO(~DOS,STATE.NY.US F-2009-0140; Fishers~landYacht Club; Policy 8.3 of the Town of Southold LWRP states: Protect the environment from degradation due to toxic pollutants and substances hazardous to the environment and public health. The policy further states that the dredging of toxic material from underwater lands and the deposition of such material shall be conducted., so as not to endanger fish and wildlife resources, in either short term or long term. Mercury is a pollutant which once introduced, bioaccumulates up the food chain, causing acute and chronic affects upon the fish and wildlife resources of the area, not to mention cumulative effects upon the human uses of those resources. While the above mentioned policies were addressed for the dock modifications, there was no discussion of effects anticipated due to the proposed dredging and dredged material disposal. Please provide a discussion of methods to be used to eliminate threats of pollutant resuspension, which may include but not be limited to the use of turbidity curtains or weirs during dredging, use of an environmental bucket for dredging, and the amendment of contaminated sediments. The supplemental environmental questionnaire to the COE application was not submitted with the joint application and Federal Consistency Assessment Form, and therefore, an analysis of alternatives has not been provided. Several alternatives to open-water disposal exist and must be identified and discussed. Any identified alternative must be examined and its feasibility determined before open- water disposal is to be considered. Additionally, DOS recommends beneficial reuse of all clean dredged material, and the amendment of the contaminated sediment with upland disposal as the preferred alternative. Please provide the information requested above as soon as possible. If this additional information and data is not provided within thirty days of the date of this letter {or May 31, 2009), the Department of State may, pursuant to 15 CFR Part 930.63(c), object to the consistency certification for this proposed activity on the grounds of insufficient information. If the Department objects to the consistency certification for this proposed activity, the consistency provisions of the federal Coastal Zone Management Act prohibit federal agency authorization of the activity, unless the Department's objection is overridden on appeal to the U.S. Secretary of Commerce. Such an appeal must be based on one or both of the grounds that the proposed activity is consistent with the objectives or purposes of the Federal Coastal Zone Management Act, or is necessary in the interest of national security. Please call me at (518) 474-1737 (email: Jennifer. Street~dos.state.n¥.us) if you have any questions regarding this matter. When communicating with us regarding this proposal, please refer to Department of State file number F-2009-0140. cerely, A ~ urces Specialist Consistency Review Unit Office of Coastal, Local Government and Community Sustainability cci COE/New York District - Steven Schumach (NAN-2008-00200~WSC) NYSDEC Region 1 - Sherri L. Aicher (1-4738-01110/00009) Southold LWRP - Mr. Mark Terry, Mr. Scott Hilary Southold Town Trustees Page 1 of 1 Standish, Lauren From: Docko, Inc. [docko@snet. net] Sent: Tuesday1 April 14, 2009 3:30 PM To: Standish1 Lauren Subject: FW: Attachments: EvacuationLetter.doc; FIFireDeptLetter.doc Hello again Lauren: Keith asked me to forward these two letters to you in support of the FIYC application. Joan From: lucindajherrick [mailto:lucindajherrick@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 3:01 PH To: docko@snet.net Cc: .]ohn Spofford Subject: Dear Keith, Attached please find two letters that we are about to receive in hard copy that will be supporting documents for our request for dredging stimulus funding. As you will read, the dredging is critical to the safety aspect of the island's infrastructure. Good luck in the town meeting tomorrow. With best wishes, Lucinda 1158 Fifth Avenue, Apt 5D New York City, NY 10029 +1 212 410 4301 (home) +1 917 837 7570 (cell) No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.46/2046 - Release Date: 4/7/2009 5:53 PM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.46/2046 - Release Date: 4/7/2009 5:53 PM 4/14/2009 P.O. Box 154 Fishers Island, NY (631) 788 7090 April 15, 2009 To Whom It May Concern: I hope that you will approve the application for dredging in West Harbor, Fishers Island, NY. I am the Deputy Emergency Preparedness Coordinator for the island. The Fishers Island Evacuation Plan has been developed by FEMA. Being an island, any evacuation will have to take place by using boats. There are two harbors that are suitable for an evacuation and that are specified in the current Evacuation Plan. West Harbor is one of them. If an evacuation is required in the winter, a population of approximately 300 will need to be taken off the island. Should an event occur in the summer, there could be up to 5,000 people who will need to be transported. Should there be time pressure in an evacuation situation, having the ~ability to collect people from two harbors would significantly reduce the time necessary to complete the evacuation. Therefore, it is vitally important for the island that West Harbor be dredged in order to accommodate large rescue boats. I hope that you will give this request your approval. Sincerely, Michael Imbriglio Deputy Emergency Preparedness Coordinator Fishers Island, NY April 8, 2009 To Whom It May Concern, This letter supports the dredging initiative at Fishers Island, NY. The Fishers Island Fire Department is in charge of maintaining and operating the island ambulance and the boat ambulance m/v "Sea Stretcher". The Sea Stretcher takes injured and ill islanders between the island and the mainland. Each year our volunteers make between 80 and 100 ambulance runs. Three quarters of these necessitate taking patients by Sea Stretcher to the mainland for further medical treatment. While there is a doctor on the island, there is no hospital. Our Fire Department is responsible for the training and administering 4 boat captains, 7 navigators and 15 EMTs. Our all-volunteer staff becomes the island Red Cross should a disaster occur. Several times a year the Sea Stretcher is unable to leave the dock during low tides. In the past several years this is becoming increasingly frequent. Being on an island with limited medical facilities it is vital that we have the ability to transport critically ill people to the superior health care that is available on the mainland. Given these circumstances, I hope that you will look favorably upon the critically important request for dredging. It is fundamental to the well-being of our island. Sincerely, Greg Cypherd, Chief Fishers Island Fire Department James F King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr P.O. Box 1179 Southold. NY [1971 Telephone (631 ) 765-1892 Fax (631 ) 765-6641 Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection/Worksession Report FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB requests a Wetland Permit to dredge 13,000 cy. of sandy silt with a 1' over-dredge allowance of 6,000 cy. over 145,000 sr. by clamshell bucket for open water disposal at New London. Remove existing "A" dock with sailing program float, "B" dock with floating "T" end and dinghy dock, construct 36 If~ of 7' wide main pier extension and seven 30'X 4' fixed fingers with associated support and tie-off/fender piles. Install 228 If. of 8' wide main float with eighteen 20'X 3' finger floats, 216 If. of 8' wide main float with thirteen 20'X 3' finger floats, two 20'X 4' finger floats, two 13'X 42' and one 19'X 42' sail floats all with associated ramps, restraint piles and tie-off/finger piles. Reconstruct or replace an existing 12'X 20' floating dinghy dock waterward of the apparent high water line, and install a small boat crane landward of the apparent high water line. Located: Central Ave., Fishers Island. SCTM#10-1-9 T~Y~sa of area to be impacted: Itwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland Sound __Bay Distance of proposed work to edge of wetland Part of Town Code proposed work falls under: __Chapt.275 Chapt. 111 other Type of Application: L~Wetland __Coastal Erosion __Amendment __Administrative__Emergency Pre-Submission Violation Modifications: Conditions: Present Were' ~J.King t~j Dohe ckerson · __ . __ . rty__P.Di D. Dzenkowski b,~J~ other q -- Form filled out in the field by~ ' D. Bergen__ B.Ghosio, Mailed/Faxed to: Date: Environmental Technician Review- Donald Wilder, Chairman Laurcn Standish, Secretary Town Hall, 53095 Main Rd. P.O. Box I 179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone (631 ) 765-1892 Fax (631 ) 765~6641 Conservation Advisory Council Town of Southold At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., March 11, 2009, the following recommendation was made: FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB to dredge 13,000 cy. of sandy silt ~Nith a 1' over-dredge allowance of 6,000 cy. over 145,000 sf. by clamshell bucket for open water disposal at New London. Remove existing "A" dock with sailing program float, "B" dock with floating "T" end and dinghy dock, construct 36 If. of 7' wide main pier extension and seven 30'X 4' fixed fingers with associated support and tie-off/fender piles. Install 228 If. of 8' wide main float with eighteen 20'X 3' finger floats, 216 If. of 8' wide main float with thirteen 20'X 3' finger floats, two 20'X 4' finger floats, two 13'X 42' and one 19'X 42' sail floats all with associated ramps, restraint piles and tie-off/finger piles. Reconstruct or replace an existing 12'X 20' floating dinghy dock waterward of the apparent high water line, and install a small boat crane landward of the apparent high water line. Located: Central Ave., Fishers Island. SCTM#10-1-9 The CAC did not make an inspection, therefore no recommendation was made. I~'CK MODIFICATIONS & DREDGI~ PHOTOGRAPHS ABOVE: THIS I>HOTOGRAPHS SHOWS THE FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CL~UB LOOKING OUT TO THE EAST DOWN THE MAIN DOCK WITH THE SAIL BOAT LAUNCH FACILITIES F[blST ON THE RIGHT~ FOLLOWD BY "A~ DOCK, *'B" DOCK AND "E' DOCK IN THE BACKGROI~ND~ BOATS CAN BE SEEN TIED lJP ON THE DINGHY DOCK BETWEEN "A*~ DOCK AND **B~' DOCK~ K MODIFICATIONS & ?HOTOGI~A?HS ABOVE: THIS PHOTOGRAPH St-lOWS THE SHORELINE FEATURES LOOKING TO THE SOUTHWEST OF THE SITE PAST TIDAL WETLANDS VEGETATION ON THE YACHT CLUB PROPERTY AS WELL II~ENNII SHAItP'S PROPERTY WITH THE TREES IN THE BACKGROUND. DOCK MODIFICATION~ & DREDGING PHOTOGRAPHS ABOVE: THfS PHOTOGRAPH SHOWS '~A~' DOCK IN ITS CURRENT CONFIGUIL4TION WITH A FIXED PIER LEADING TO A FLOATING CONCRETE DOCK WHICH EIINGED RAMP ACCESS. WHAT IS MISSING IN THIS PHOTOGRAPH IS THE SAILING PROG~M DOCK W~C~ NORMALLY LAYS A~JACENT TO AND TO THE RIGHT O1; THE FLOAT, SAILBOATS P~TICD>ATING fN THE SAILING PROGRAM T~T A~ LAUNCHED ON A DALLY BASIS ARE LAUNCH FROM THE RAMP IN THE FOREGROUND (LOWER RIGHT) AND TH~ BROUGHT UP ONTO THE SAILING PROG~M FLOAT AFTER THE DAY*S ACT[VIT[ES~ THE WATERS IN THE VICINITY OF ~'A" DOCK AS RECONFIGURED, WILL BE DREDGED TO -4 FEET AT MEAN LOW WATER. FISttERS ISLAND YACttT CLt. IB DOCK MODIFICATIONS & DREDGING PHOTO(; RAPHS ABOVE: THIS PHOTOGI~AP}t TAKEN FROM *~E' DOCK LOOKING TO THE NORTHWEST SHOWS THE FIXED PIER AND FINGER PIERS AT "B' DOCK. "A' DOCK IS BARELY DISCERNAgLE IN THE BACKGROUND WHE~ THE PIER CAN BE S~ JI~ST A[~}VE AND T/O THE ~GHT OF ~; CEN~R OF THE PHOTOG~PH. THIS PIER AND FINGER PIERS WILL BE REMOVED AND ~PLACED WITH A FLOATING I}~K SYSTEM IN Tt~ ULTIMATE PLAN. THE WATERS BET-WEEN '~E~ DOCK AND ~B~ DO(X WILL BE DREDGED TO -5 ~-. THE WATERS BETWEEN ~B' AND "A' DOCK AND IN THE VICINITY OF THE DINGHY 1~TK, WILL BE DREDGED TO -4 FEET~ ISLAND YACHT CL DOCK MODIFICATIONS & DREDGING PHOTOGRAPHS ABOVE: THIS PHOTOGRAPH SHOWS THE TIE-OFF AND ~STRAINT PILES THAT ARE UTILIZED FOR THE "T' END DOCK SYSTEMS FOR BOTH "A' AND ~'B' DOCK. THESE PILES WILL ALL BE REMOVED WHEN THE NEW FLOATING DEPTH OF 5 FEET BELOW MEAN LOW WATER FOR THE WATERS IN THE FOREGRO{JND, AND IX) 4 FEET BELOW MEAN LOW WATER FOR THE WATERS AROUND "A' DOCK IN THE BACKGROUND. FISHERS~SLAND A(HF£LUB DOCK MODIFICATIONS & DREDGING PHOTOGRAI>HS ABOVE: THIS ?IiOTOGRAPH SHOWS THE END OF THE FIXED PIER FACILFI~IES AT THE NORTH END OF *~E' DOCK LOOKING STI~A[GHT WEST TOWARD THE YACHT CLUB DOCK MANAGER'S HOUSE AND CLUB HOUSE. THIS AREA WILl, gE DREDGED TO -7 IN THE MAIN BASIN~ AND TO ~8 FEET IN THE FOREGRO~JND BETWEEN THE END OF THE PIER AND THE POSITION WHERE THE PHOTOGI~PH WAS TAKEN FROM~ FISHERS ~SLAND YACHT CLUBO DOCK MODIFICATIONS & DREI GING ~ HO FOGRAPHS ABOVE: THIS PttOTOGRAI~H SHOWS THE CORNER OF THE PARKING / FLOATING DOCK STOtL~GE AREA ADJACENT TO THE GOOSE ISLAND PROPERTY ON THE NORTH END OF THE SITE. THE GOOSE ISLAND BUILDING IS SHOW~N IN THE BACKGROUND IN THE UPPER RIGHTHAND CORNER OF THE PHOTO. TIlE POINT OF LAND WHERE THE STONE REVETMENT TURNS FROM EAST / WEST TO NORTH / SOUTH ALONG THE RIGHT EDGE OF THE ?HOTOGRA~H, ~S THE AREA W~ERE THE PRO?OSED ~OAT CRANE ~S TO BE INSTALLED. FROM THIS POINT, THE CLUB WILL BE ABLE TO EASILY HOIST BOATS AND SET THEM ON TRAILERS OR CARTS SO THAT THEY CAN BE WHEELED INTO STORAGE POSITIONS AS NECESSARY. ', i 23 LOCATION MAP Pi{OJECT: WATERWAY: LOCATION: APPLICANT: DATE: AGENT: "DOCK MODIFICATIONS & DREDGING" WEST HARBOR FISHERS ISLAND, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB JANUARY 2, 2008 DOCKO, INC. 37 0 U T Harbor Silver u s co*sr - Bi.,oCI~' " 'IS£A-~D 'PO '~ c.,oos£ TAX ASSESSOR'S MAP 010, SECTION 1, LOT 9 PROJECT: WATERWAY: LOCATION: Af?L~CANT: DATE: AGENT: "DOCK MODIFICATIONS & DREDGING" WEST HARBOR FISHERS ISLAND, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK frlSHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB JANUARY 2, 2008 DOCKO, INC. P.O. Box 421, Mystic, CT 06355 (860) 572-8939 Fax: (860) 572-7569; email: docko@snet.net April 23, 2009 Ms Lauren Standish Southold Board of Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: West Harbor Dredging Dear Ms Standish: We are transmitting herewith a copy of the drawing showing the proposed d~dging in West Harbor dated August 13, 1969 that you and Keith discussed at the Trustee's meeting on Wednesday evening. APR 2 7 '2009 Yours truly, Admini~h:~ive Assistant JM:jm Attachment CC: File: 00-03-1078 F.I.Y.C DAVID A. PATERSON (~OVERNOR Mr. Keith Neilson, P.E. Docko, Inc. P.O. Box 421 Mystic, CT 06355 Re: STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE ONE COMMERCE PLAZA 99 WASHINGTON AVENUE ALBANY, NY 12231-0001 July 28, 2009 LORRAINE A. CORTI~S-VAZQUEZ SECRE~rARy OF STATE F-2009-0140 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/New York District Permit Application - Fishers Island Yacht Club - proposed replacement, modification and addition to existing dock configuration, proposed dredging of 13,000cy of material with allowable overdredge of approximately 6,000cy for a total of approximately 19,000cy of material to be disposed of at the open-water New London Disposal Site (NLDS) in Long Island Sound (LIS), Town of Southold, Suffolk County. Request for Additional Information Dear Mr. Neilson: The Department of State began its review of the above-referenced activity on February 12, 2009. Pursuant to 15 CFR Part 930.58, the following additional information and data is necessary to enable the Department of State to adequately assess the consistency of the proposed activity with the New York Coastal Management Program: According to the dredged material suitability determination made by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) New England District (NAE), a portion of the sediment proposed for removal (represented by sample #1) does not meet the criteria for unconfined open-water disposal, as it contains elevated mercury levels measured at four (4) times the NLDS baseline level. The Public Notice issued by the COE New York District on June 2, 2009 indicates that the capping plan for this proposal requires COE review and approval. The project descriptions includes disposal at the NLDS with capping of the conlaminated sediments. However, you have not provided any data regarding the capping plan from the COE, New England District or New York District. Please provide a copy of the capping plan for this project, together with any available sediment chemistries pertaining to the cap material. Please be advised that if the volume of cap material required for the project brings the total volume of material placed at the NLDS in association with this proposal to the total volume of 25,000 cubic yards or more, the material is then required to comply with the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act (Ocean Dumping Act or ODA) testing criteria. If this is the case and testing of the material has already been performed pursuant to ODA standards, please WWW.DOS.STATE.NY.US · E-MAIL:INFO~DOS.STATE.NY.US F-2009-0140 Fishers Island Yacht Club ,qddlnfo. 2 p. 2 provide a copy of the results to our office as well. This information is necessary to assess the consistency of the proposal with the enforceable policies of the Long Island Sound Coastal Management Program. Plea,~.~uested above as soon as possible. If this additional in~'~ o. t"p~,~)~.i.d~ed, the Department of State may, pursuant to 15 CFR Part 930.~2~(&)~'~gie~t to the consi~te'fig~y certification for this proposed activity on the grounds of insut~:ient informat4onl1_, -- - .. ii ',..t If the! )ep~tr. tment objec~,to~e coxlsistency certification for this proposed activity, the consi~ tency pro~isi0ns of'ttm.f~l Coastal Zone Management Act prohibit federal agency authm zati-o-ff"6Tihe~hc~tivity, unless the Department's objection is overridden on appeal to the U.S. Secretary of Commerce. Such an appeal must be based on one or both of the grounds that the proposed activity is consistent with the objectives or purposes of the Federal Coastal Zone Management Act, or is necessary in the interest of national security. Please call me at (518) 474-1737 (email: Jennifer. Street~dos.state.ny.us) if you have any questions regarding this matter. When communicating with us regarding this proposal, please refer to Department of State file number F-2009-0140. Sincerely, Coastal Resources Specialist Consistency Review Unit Office of Coastal, Local Government and Community Sustainability CCl COE/New York District - Steven Schumach (NAN-2008-00200-WSC) NYSDEC Region I - Sherri L. Aicher (1-4738-01110/00009) Southold LWRP - Mr. Mark Terry Southold Town Trustees REPLY TO ATTENTION OF DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NEW YORK DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS JACOB K. JAVITS FEDERAL BUILDING NEVV YORK, N.Y. 10278-0090 AU$ 2 2OO9 Regulatory Branch SUBJECT: Permit Application Number NA~ by Fishers Island Yacht Club Fishers Island Yacht Club c/o Keith B. Neilson, P.E. Docko, Inc., PO Box 421 Mystic, CT 06355 Dear Mr. Neilson: AUG31 2009 Seuthold Town Board of Trustees This is in regard to the above referenced application by the Fishers Island Yacht Club to dredge 19,000 cubic yards of dredged material from the West Harbor of Fisher's Island Sound in Fishers Island, Town of Southold, Suffolk County New York. The dredged material would be placed in the New London Disposal Site (NLDS). In response to the public notice issued for your proposal, the following comments have been received: o June 15, 2009 letter from the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation o August 11, 2009 letter from the National Marine Fisheries Service on endangered species consultation Since the above letters do not object or provide significant comments regarding to your proposal, copies are enclosed for your information only and a reply is not required. In addition, we have received your letter dated August 11, 2009 addressed to the New York State Department of State (NYSDOS}, requesting that NYSDOS stay its coastal zone management consistency (WQC) certification review for three years. NYSDOS provided a copy of its signed agreement with the applicant to extend its review until August 10, 2012, copies enclosed. In accordance with Title 33 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 325.2 (b) (1) (ii) and (b) (2) (ii) no permit may be issued until the applicant obtains the required water quality (WQC) and coastal zone management (CZM) consistency certifications. In view of the stay in processing CZM by NYSDOS until August 10, 2012, we are withdrawing your application. Your application will remain on file until August 10, 2012 at which time we can reinstate processing upon receipt of the required CZM from the NYSDOS. In addition, a copy of your permit from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation is requested. If you plan to place the dredged material in NLDS, WQC and CZM will also be required from the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection. The action taken at this time will in no way adversely affect your future request or any other applications you may submit for work in waters of the United States. If any questions should arise concerning this matter, please contact Steven Schumach, of my staff, at (917) 790-8417. Sincerely, Christopher'S. Mallgry, Ph.D. Chief, W~stern Permits Section Enclosures 1. June 15, 2009 OPRHP letter 2. August 11, 2009 NMFS letter 2. August 11, 2009 Docko letter 3. August 11, 2009 Agreement between the applicant and NYSDOS Copies furnished (with enclosures): Jennifer Street, NYSDOS (F-2009-0140) Sherri L. Aicher, NYSDEC Region 1 (1-4738-0110/00009) George Wisker, CTDEP Diane Ray, Corps of Engineers, New England District Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator, Town of Southold James King, President, Town of Southold Trustees 2 New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau · Peebles Island, PO Box 189, Watedord, New York 12188-0189 518-237-8643 June 15, 2009 www rrysparks.com David A. Paterson Carol Ash Richard L. Tomer US Army Corps of Engineers Jacob K. Javitts FcderaI Building New York, New York 10278-0090 Re: CORPS PERMITS Piers and dredging / Fisher Island Yacht Club request / NAN-2008-200-WSC West Harbor / Fishers Island Sound SOUTHOLD, Suffolk County 09PR03129 Dear Mr. Tomer: Thank you for requesting the comments of the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). We have reviewed the project in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966. These comments are those of the SHPO and relate only to Historic/Cultural resources. They do not include potential environmental impacts to New York State Parkland that may be involved in or near your project. Such impacts must be considered as part of the environmental review of the project pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act and/or the State Environmental Quality Review Act (New York Environmental Conservation Law Article 8). Based upon this review, it is the SHPO's opimon that your project will have No Effect upon cultural resources in or eligible for inclusion in the National Registers of Historic Places. If further correspondence is required regarding this project, please be sure to refer to the OPRHP Project Review (PR) number noted above. Sincerely, Ruth L. Pierpont Director An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Agency Richard L. Tomer Regulatory Branch Department of the Army New York District, Corps of Engineers Jacob K. Javits Federal Building New York, New York 10278-0090 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE NORTHF_AST REGION 55 Great Republic Drive Gloucester, MA 01930-2276 Re: NAN-2008-200-WSC Dear Mr. Tomer, 'This is in response to your letter dated June 2, 2009 requesting consultation pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended, regarding an application by Fishers Island Yacht Club to dredge and perform dock modifications within the existing marina. The prOject is located in West Harbor at Fisher's Island, Suffolk County, New York. The Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) has made the preliminary, determination that the proposed project is not likely to adversely affect any species listed as threatened or endangered by NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and has requested that NMFS concur with this determination. Proposed Project The proposed project will involve construction activities that will restore depths for sate navigation within the boat basin, as well as, provide maximum berthing and mooring accommodations at the marina. The following work is proposed: Dredging Approximately 13,000 cubic yards of dredged material will be removed from an area of approximately i45,000 squme f~et, via a clamshell bucket dredge, to depths of 4, 5, 6, and 7 feet below the plane of mean low water (MLW) plus a one foot overdepth of approximately 6,000 cubic yards, providing a total volume of 19,000 cubic yards. No barge overflow is proposed. It is expected that dredging wilt take approximately 50 days to complete and will be done in September or October 2009. All dredge material will be transported by barge to the New London Disposal Site (NLDS). Since 1981, the NLDS has been operating as an active open water dredged material disposal site located 3.1 nautical miles [nm) (5.4 kilometers (km)) south of Eastern Point, Groton, Connecticut in Long Island Sound. Currently, this site is utilized for the unconfined disposal of suitable sediments, as well as, subaqueous capping of sediments deemed unsuitable for open water disposal. In a ACOE memo, dated December 31,2008 regarding the suitability of the proposed material to be dredged from Fishers Island Yacht Club, it was determined, based on physical and chemical analysis, that the material was acceptable for disposal at the NLDS provided it was capped with suitable sediment, as five cores taken fi.om the project area indicated that some components of the samples contained unsuitable material to be disposed of at the NLDS (i.e., mercury was three times the NLDS (reference site) level). The Environmental Protection Agency also concurred with this determination under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. In addition, all physical and chemical tests preformed on the proposed material to be dredged satisfied Part 227.13(b) of the exclusionary criteria of the Ocean Dumping Act regulations regarding biological testing. Under the proposed project, the ACOE proposes to use the NLDS for a 3 year period to allow for periodic maintenance dredging of the Fishers Yacht Club. Pier Reconfiguration and Modifications · Dock A: Remove a 60 foot long by 7 foot wide main fixed pier, a 100 foot long by 7 foot wide main float, a 74 foot long by 6 foot wide outer "T" shaped float, 3 sail boat floats and associated mooring piles to facilitate the construction of an 8 foot wide by 216 foot long main floating concrete pier assembly. The concrete pier assembly will consist of a sail float of 19 feet by 42 feet, two sail floats of 13 feet by 42 feet, two finger floats of 4 feet by 20 feet, and thirteen finger floats of 3 feet wide by 20 feet long with tie-off/fender piles. All floats will be secured by driving twenty-three 12"- 16" diameter Southern Yellow Pine (timber) restraint piles. Eleven 12"-16" diameter Southern Yellow Pine (timber) tie-offffender piles will also be driven. · Dock B: Remove a 150 foot long by 5 V2 foot wide fixed pier, 4 finger piers, a 90 foot long by 6 wide "T" shaped outer float, an outer ramp float, and associated mooring piles to facilitate the construction of an 8 foot wide by 228 foot long floating concrete pier assembly. The concrete pier assembly will consist ora hinged walk-ramp of 3 t/2 feet wide by 20 feet long and eighteen finger floats of 3 feet wide by 20 feet long with associated ramps and tie-off/fender piles. The finger floats will be secured by driving twenty-six 12"-16" diameter Southern Yellow Pine (timber) restraint piles. Forty-one 12"-16" diameter Southern Yellow Pine (timber) tie-off/fender piles will also be driven. · Dock E: Add to the existing 8 foot wide by 185 foot long Dock E a 7 foot wide by 36 foot long open pile pier extension and a seven 4 foot wide by 30 foot long finger pier with tie-off/fender piles. The piers will be supported by driving forty nine 12"-16" diameter Southern Yellow Pine (timber) support piles. Eighteen 12'-16" diameter Southern Yellow Pine (timber) tie-off/fender piles will also be driven. NMFS listed species in Project Area The proposed project is located in West Harbor, which is part of Fishers Island and is surrounded by Block Island Sound to the south and Long Island Sound to the North. West Harbor flows into Long Island Sound. The action area is defined as "all areas to be affected directly or indirectly by the Federal action and not merely the immediate area involved in the action" (50CFR§402.02). For this project, the action area includes the project footprint as well as the underwater area where effects of dredging and pile driving (i.e., increase in suspended sediment, underwater noise levels) will be experienced. Based on analysis of other mechanical dredging activities (Burton 1993, ACOE 2007), suspended sediment plumes are expected to be fully dissipated at a distance of 620-1500 meters t?om the dredge site. The exact size of the plume is influenced by the particular dredge used, the dredge operator, sediment type, strength of current and tidal stage and is likely to vary throughout the project. Regardless of these variables, the maximum distance of increased suspended sediment is likely to be 1500 meters from the dredge bucket. Based on the analysis of pile driving activities (i.e., the type and size of the piles to be driven), effects of increased under water noise will be experienced from a 10-40 meter or more radius of the pile to be driven (Laughlin 2005; Jones and Stoke 2007; Illinworth and Rodkin, Inc. 2007~). As such, the action area is considered to be that area within the West Harbor located within a 1500 meter radius from the area to be dredged and within a 10-40 meter or more radius of the piles being driven. Additionally, the action area includes the NLDS disposal site where dredged material will be disposed of and the route used by barges to transport dredged material from the dredge site in West Harbor to the NLDS disposal site in Long Island Sound. Four species of federally threatened or endangered sea turtles under the jurisdiction of NMFS may be found seasonally in the coastal waters of New York. Sea turtles are expected to be in the waters of Long Island in warmer months, typically from June I to mid November and are frequently documented in the bays and harbors of southern and eastern Long Island and occur less frequently in the bays and harbors of mid and western Long Island. The sea turtles in northeastern nearshore waters are typically small juveniles with the most abundant being the federally threatened loggerhead (Caretta caretta) followed by the federally endangered Kemp's ridley (Lepidochelys kempi). The waters off Long Island have also been found to be warm enough to support federally endangered green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas) from June through October. The three species of chelonid turtles found in the Northeast remain very briefly in open ocean waters, spending most of their time during the summer months in harbors and estuarine waters. While federally endangered leatherback sea turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) may be found in the waters off Long Island during the warmer months as well, this species is unlikely to occur in the action area for this project as it is typically found in deeper, more offshore waters. Sea turtles are also known to occur in Long Island Sound. Studies in New York waters have indicated that sea turtles mainly occurred in areas where the water depth was between 16 and 49 feet and waters were slow-moving or still (i.e., less than 2 knots) (Morreale and Standora 1990). The habitat characteristics of the action area (i.e., MLW depths between 4-7 feet) are inconsistent with the preferred habitats of sea turtles in New York waters. As such, it is unlikely that sea turtles will occur in the area where construction activities will occur, however, sea turtle occurrence around the NLDS and along the transport route to the NLDS is likely to occur, and as such, may be exposed to the effects of these operations. Listed whales, including endangered North Atlantic right (Eubalaena glacialis), humpback (Megaptera novaeangliae), sperm (Physter macrocephalus) and fin (Balaenoptera physalus) whales also occur seasonally offthe southern coast of Long Island. Humpback whales are found in greatest numbers around Long Island between June-September and have been observed for extended periods of time within Long Island Sound, Block Island Sound, and Gardiner's Bay. North Atlantic right whales have been documented in the nearshore waters of New York from September 1 - March 31 and sperm whales are seasonally present in the waters offofNew York, but are typically found in deeper offshore waters. Fin whales, although rare in Long Island Sound, are one of the most abundant large baleen whales in the Long Island Region and are present year round. From April-August fin whales are found approximately 30 miles off the eastern end of Long Island; from September-December the whales move offshore along the continental shelf; and from January to March the whales are found within I mile of the eastern shore of Long Island. Due to the depths and near shore location of the construction activities and NLDS (3.1 nm from shore), it is extremely unlikely that listed species of whales will occur in the action area and be exposed to any effects of the proposed project. As such, the remainder of this letter will only consider effects to listed species of sea turtles within the action area. Effects of the Action The proposed project will involve several in-water activities, detailed below. These include: pile driving and dredging. Effects of these actions, other construction activities, and the use of the NLDS will be discussed below. Dredging A clamshell bucket dredge will be used for this project. Sea turtles are not known to be vulnerable to capture in clam shell dredges, presumably because they are able to avoid the relatively slow moving dredge bucket. As noted above, sea turtles are highly unlikely to occur in the area where dredging will occur. However, even if transient sea turtles were present, no sea turtles are likely to be injured or killed as a result of dredging operations. The proposed dredging will cause a temporary increase in the amount of turbidity in the action area; however, suspended sediment is expected to settle out of the water column within a few hours and any increase in turbidity will be short term. As noted above, the size ora sediment plume is influenced by many factors. The turbidity plume associated with a typical mechanical dredging operation extends approximately 1000 feet at the surface and 1600 feet near the bottom (ACOE 1983). The maximum distance reported in the literature is 1500 meters, which occurred in an area with very strong tidal currents (ACOE 2007). Several studies have monitored sediment plumes associated with dredging projects along the Atlantic coast. Turbidity levels associated with these sediment plumes typically range from 26-350mg/L (ACOE 2007, Anchor Environmental 2003) with the highest levels detected adjacent to the dredge bucket and concentrations decreasing with greater distance from the dredge (see ACOE 2007). No information is available on the effects of turbidity or suspended sediment (TSS) on juvenile and adult sea turtles. Studies of the effects of turbid waters on fish suggest that concentrations of suspended solids can reach thousands of milligrams per liter before an acute toxic reaction is expected (Burton 1993). TSS is most likely to affect sea turtles ifa plume causes a barrier to normal behaviors or if sediment settles on the bottom affecting sea turtle prey. As sea turtles are highly mobile they are likely to be able to avoid any sediment plume and any effect on sea turtle movements is likely to be insignificant. Additionally, the TSS levels expected (26-350rog/L) are below those shown to have an adverse effect on fish (580mg/L for the most sensitive species, with 1,000mg/L more typical; see summary of scientific literature in Burton 1993) and benthic communities (390mg/L (EPA 1986)). Based on this information, it is likely that the effect of the suspension of sediment resulting from dredging operations will be insignificant. Dredging can cause effects on sea turtles by reducing prey species through the alteration of the existing biotic assemblages. The area to be dredged has depths between 4-7 feet. The area is inconsistent with the depths known to be used by foraging sea turtles in New York waters (i.e., 16-49 feet). As such, the dredging activities are not likely to disrupt normal feeding behaviors for sea turtles and are not likely to remove critical amounts of prey resources from West Harbor. In addition, the dredging activities also are not likely to alter the habitat in any way that prevents sea turtles fi.om using West Harbor as a migratory pathway. As such, the effects of dredging on foraging or migrating sea turtles will be insignificant. Pile Driving The proposed project will involve driving, non-continuously, of 12"-16" diameter timber piles. The installation of piles via pile driving can produce underwater sound pressure waves that can affect aquatic species. The available literature indicates that the driving of timber piles results in underwater noise levels of 160 dBR~4sI from at a distance of 20 meters from the source (lllinworth and Rodkin Inc., 20072). These levels are dependent not only on the pile and hammer characteristics, but also on the geometry and boundaries of the surrounding underwater and benthic environment. As the distance from the source increases, underwater sound levels produced by pile driving are known to dissipate rapidly. Using data from Illinworth and Rodkin, Inc. (2007), which indicates for 12"-16" diameter timber piles sound levels attenuate 5dB per 20 meters, NMFS has calculated that at a distance beyond 20 meters from the pile being driven, noise levels will be below 160dB (i.e., at 40 meters sound levels will be approximately 155dB). The hearing capabilities of sea turtles are poorly known and there is little available information on the effects of noise on sea turtles. Current thresholds for determining impacts to marine mammals and sea turtles typically center around root-mean-square (RMS) received levels of 180 dB re 1 pPa for potential injury, 160 dB re 1 pPa for behavioral disturbance/harassment from a non-continuous noise source, and 120 dB re 1 gpa for behavioral disturbance/harassment from a continuous noise source. Pile driving is considered a non-continuous noise source. As noted above, sound levels may be as high as 160 dB re 1 gPa within 20 meters of the pile being driven, but will be lower than 160 dB beyond 20 meters of the pile being driven. As explained above, due to the habitat characteristics of the West Harbor portion of the action area, sea turtles are unlikely to occur within 20 or more meters of the piles being driven. Based on this information, the noise effects of pile driving on sea turtle species is discountable. The installation of steel piles will disturb bottom sediments. However, little increase in sedimentation or turbidity is expected to result from these construction activities. If any sediment plume does occur, it is expected to be small and suspended sediment is expected to settle out of the water column within a few hours and any increase in turbidity will be short term. Additionally, sea turtles are expected to be able to temporarily avoid the area and continue normal behaviors nearby in adjacent portions of the river. Therefore, there would not be any ~Root Mean Square (rms) pressure is the square root of the time average of the squared pressure. The rms pressure level is the decibel level for the mas pressure. The reference in water is usually I gPa. -Compendium of Pile Driving Sound Data, California: Illinworth and Rodkin, lnc, 2007. disruption of essential behaviors such as migrating or foraging. Based on this information, and thc fact that sea turtles are unlikely to occur in the West Harbor portion of the action area, any effects of pile driving are expected to be discountable. Other Construction The removal of pier components, such as the fixed pier, main floats, "T" shaped floats, sail boat floats, and mooring piles, will disturb shoreline sediments and may cause a temporary increase in suspended sediment in the nearshore area. However, little increase in sedimentation or turbidity is expected to result from these construction activities. If any sediment plume does occur, it is expected to be small and suspended sediment is expected to settle out of the water column within a few hours and any increase in turbidity will be short term. Additionally, sea turtles are expected to be able to temporarily avoid the area and continue normal behaviors nearby in adjacent portions of the river. Therefore, there would not be any disruption of essential behaviors such as migrating or foraging. Based on this information, and the fact that sea turtle species are unlikely to occur in the portion of the action area where construction activities will occur due to unsuitable habitat, any effects of other construction activities to sea turtles are expected to be discountable. The structural work, including the installation of floats and ramps is not expected to affect sea turtles because the work will occur above the surface of the water where this species will not be present. No other effects from the construction components of the proposed project will affect any listed sea turtles. NLDS Disposal Site and Transit Route As noted above, listed sea turtles are likely to be present throughout Long Island Sound from June I through mid November of any year and as such, may be present near the NLDS during this time frame. Sea turtles that are present at a disposal area while disposal activities occur may be affected by temporary increases in suspended sediment and turbidity and may also be affected bythe resuspension of toxic material. Dredged material is tested before disposal to insure it is suitable for in water disposal, which therefore, minimizes the potential for resuspension of toxic materials into the water column. Material at the proposed dredge site in West Harbor has been tested and approved for disposal at the NLDS by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection provided that any unsuitable material will be capped with suitable material. As such, any effects of disposal of dredged material on sea turtles are expected to be insignificant. In addition, turtles are highly mobile and expected to be able to avoid areas of increased turbidity and any effects are likely to be insignificant. The NLDS has also been used as a disposal site since 1981. As such, it is not likely to be a high use area for sea turtle foraging and therefore, is not expected to significantly impact the prey base for sea turtles in the area as sea turtles are highly mobile and expected to be able to find other nearby areas with suitable forage. As sea turtles may occur in the portion of the action area located along the transportation route to the NLDS, sea turtles could potentially be struck by the barge. However, while sea turtles may be vulnerable to being struck by fast moving vessels, strikes are thought to occur most often by fast moving recreational vessels. As the barge will be moving at slow speeds (i.e. 6-9 miles per hour), it is extremely unlikely for sea turtles to be struck by the vessel. In addition, when sea turtle species are present in New York waters (i.e., June-November) they tend to concentrate in bays and estuaries with depths that are between 16 feet- 49 feet, not the deep waters where the NLDS is located (i.e., up to 79 feet). Based on this information, NMFS is able to conclude that the interaction between a sea turtle and barge is discountable. Conclusions Based on the analysis that any effects to listed sea turtles will be insignificant or discountable, NMFS is able to concur with the determination that the authorization by the ACOE for the project proposed by Fishers Island Yacht Club is not likely to adversely affect any listed species under NMFS jurisdiction. Therefore, no further consultation pursuant to section 7 of the ESA is required. Reinitiation of consultation is required and shall be requested by the Federal agency or by the Service, where discretionary Federal involvement or control over the action has been retained or is authorized by law and: (a) If new information reveals effects of the action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner or to an extent not previously considered in the consultation; (b) If the identified action is subsequently modified in a manner that causes an effect to the listed species or critical habitat that was not considered in the consultation; or (c) If a new species is listed or critical habitat designated that may be affected by the identified action. Should you have any questions about this correspondence please contact Danielle Palmer at (978) 282-8468 or by e-mail (Danielle. Palmer~Noaa.gov). Sincerely, Patricia A. Kurkul Regional Administrator Ec: Rusanowsky, F/NER4 Palmer, F/NER3 File Code: Sec 7 ACOE NY Fishers Island Yacht Club PCTS: I/N EPU2009/03898 Docko, Inc ~hewaterfrom since ~987 Serving community RO. Box 421, Mystic, CT 06355.(860) 572-8939 Fax: (860) 572-7569, emai[: docko@snet.net August ] t, 2009 Ms Jennifer Street, Coastal Resource Specialist NYS DOS - Consistency Review Unit 1 Commercial Plaza 99 Washington Avenue Albany, NY 12231-0001 RECEIVED AUG l 1 2009 COASTAL RESOuRcES Re: Fishers Island Yacht Club Dredging Application Stay Dear Ms Street: Following up on our conversation two weeks ago we respectfully request a 3-year stay in the review process for maintenance dredging at the Fishers Island Yacht Club on Fishers Island, New York. Although we are in the process of meeting with different agencies and attempting to resolve various permitting issues, we believe that we will complete this process before August 30, 2012. A stay for that period of time is therefore requested. We feel that it would be best to keep this project open during that period so that qaestions that are asked can be resolved with factual information based on a current application. Your assistance in effectuating this stay would be greatly appreciated. Please let me know if we need to do anything fi~rther or how best to formalize this an'angement. Yours truly, DOC. KO, . C. \.,.. KBN:jm CC: FIYC: Herrick US ACOE: Schumach US ACiDE NER: Ray File: 00-03-1078 F.I.Y.C AGKEEMENq- BETWEEN THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE AND FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB TO STAY ThE COASTAL CONSISTENCY REVIEW pERIOD FOR THE RECONFIGURATION AND MODII~ICATION OF PIERS AND DREDGING WIXH PLACEMENT O~: THE DREDGED MA'rERIAL IN THE NEW LONDON DISPOSAL SITE ("MAINTENANCE DREDGE AND DISPOSAL PROIECT") Pursuant to 15 CICR § 930.60(b), th: New York Slate Deparh'acnt of St'at= (DOS) agcees with Fishers IMand Yacht Club Io stay the framing of the coastal consistency review p~fiod for the Maintenance Dredge and Disposal Pxqiect (F-2009-0140) for 3 years b~ginning on August Il, 2009 and ending on August 11, 2012. Unless the Fcriod is shortened or extended by mutttai agreement of the: u.ndersi~ned, DOS will isstie a com~istency d~termination on the Maintenance Dredge and Disposal Project on or before 2012. First Depuiy Secrelary o[..S~tate K¢ith B. Neilson. P,E. DOCKO,~c. COE,'New York District - Stcvea Schumach (app# NAN-2008-O0200-WSC) COE/New England District - Diane Ray (apl~ NAE-2008-00339) NYSDEC Region ! -- Sberri L. Aichet (app,q 1-4738-01110/00009) Town of Southo[d - Mark Terry, L~rp..P Coordinator Town of Southold Trustees - James King, President RECEIVED AUG 1 1 2009 COASTAL RESOURCE5 DAVID A. PATERSON GOVERNOR TO: CC: FROM: SUBJECT: STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE ONE COMMERCE PLAZA 99 WASHINGTON AVENUE ALBANY, NY 12231-0001 LORRAINE A. CORTgS-VAZQUEZ SECRETARY OF STATE MEMORANDUM Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator, Town of Southold Scott Hilary, LWRP Coordinator, Town of Southold Board of Trustees, Town of Southold Jennifer Street, Coastal Resources Specialist, Consistency Review Unit,(-~O~ Office of Coastal, Local Government and Community Sustainability ** *Please Note ()ur New Department Name *** NYS DOS #F-2009-0140 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/New York District Permit Application, Fishers Island Yacht Club, modification to previous review (F-2008-017 l)- Dock modifications and dredging in West Harbor with open-water disposal at New London Disposal Site. DATE: April 16, 2009 Enclosed is a copy of the Federal Consistency Assessment form and permit application for the above-referenced project for your information and preliminary review for LWRP Consistency. Please contact me, the DOS reviewer assigned to this project, at (518) 474-1737 (e-mail: Jennifer. Street~dos.state.ny.us) to discuss applicable LWRP policies and concerns, and any additional information which may be necessary to assist you in reviewing this project. Any comments you may have will assist the Department in reaching a decision as to the consistency of the proposed action with the approved Town of Southold LWRP. We would appreciate hearing from you on this proposed project within 30 days (May 16, 2009). If we do not hear from you by that date, we will presume that you have no objections to the proposed project. encl. /jls CC: Docko, Inc. - Mr. Kieth B. Neilson, P.E. COE/New York District - Steven Schumach NAN-2008~320-WSC (no encl.) NYSDEC/Region I - Sherri Aicher 1-4737-01110/00009 (no encl.) WWW.DOS.STATE.NY.US · E-MAIL:INFO~DOS.STATE.NY.US NYS Register/March 25, 2009 Miscellaneous Notices/Hearings described below, which are subject to the consistency provm~ons of the Federal Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended. The applicant has certified that the proposed activity complies with and will be conducted in a manner consistent with the approved New York State Coastal Management Program· The applicant's consis- tency certification and accompanying public information and data are available for inspection at the New York State Department of State of- flees located at One Commerce Plaza, 99 Washington Avenue in Albany, New York. In F-2009-0001, the New York City Department of Environmental Protection is seeking approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) for the dredging and removal of approximately 15,200 cubic yards of contaminated sediments deposited from combined sewer overflows (CSOs) within the head end of Paerdegat Basin. Once the sediments have been removed, the applicants propose to place ap- proximately one (1) foot of clean sand cap. The contaminated sedi- ments are proposed to be disposed of at an approved upland Iocafion, in accordance with all applicable requirements. The applicants have also proposed to dredge approximately 5,500 cubic yards of clean ma- terial from the inlet channel to the basin to improve public access· The clean dredged material is proposed to be used for beneficial re-use projects in the surrounding area. The proposed activity is to be under- taken in the Paerdegut Basin, Brooklyn, Kings County. The stated purpose of the proposal is to remove sediments deposited from CSOs within the head end of the basin· These sediments have resulted in the generation of intermittent nuisance odors due to hydrogen sulfide emissions from decaying matter in CSO sediment. The inlet to the basin will be dredged as a result of requests from stakeholders to restore boat navigation within the basin. · Any interested parties and/or agencies desiring to express their wews concerning the above proposed activities may do so by filing their comments, in writing, no later than 4:30 p.m., 15 days from the date of publication of thls notice, or, April 9, 2009. Comments should be addressed to the Division of Coastal Re- sources and Waterfront Revitalization, New York State Department of State, One Commerce Plaza, 99 Washington Avenue, Albany, New York 12231. Telephone (518) 474-6000; Fax (518) 473-2464. This notice is promulgated in accordance with Title 15, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 930. PUBLIC NOTICE Department of State F-2009-0059 Date of Issuance-March 25, 2009 The New York State Department of State (DOS) is required by Federal regulations to provide timely public notice for the activities described below, which are subject to the consistency provisions of the Federal Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended. The applicant has certified that the proposed activity complies with and will be conducted in a manner consistent with the approved New York State Coastal Management Program. The applicant's consis- tency certification and accompanying public information and data are available for inspection at the New York State Department of State of- rices located at One Commerce Plaza, 99 Washington Avenue in Albany, New York. In F-2009-0059, the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Prese~wation (OPRHP) is seeking approval from the National Parks Service (NPS) under the Federal Land and Water Con- servation Fund (LWCF) for the conversion of a parcel of land situated at Jones Beach State Park totaling 128,704 square feet for the construc- tion oftbe Jones Beach Restaurant and Catering Facility and appurte- nances ("Trump on the Ocean"). The substitution parcel is a 72 acre parcel situated in the Hamlet of Ridge, Town of Brookhaven, Suffolk County. The stated purpose of the proposal is to replace the previous Boardwalk Restaurant that was partially demolished in 2004, and that had replaced the Boardwalk Restaurant originally constructed in the 1930s. Any interested parties and/or agencies desiring to express their views concerning the above proposed activities may do so by filing their comments, in writing, no later than 4:30 p.m., 30 days from the date of publication of this notice, or, April 24, 2009. Comments should be addressed to the Division of Coastal Re- sources and Waterfront Revitalization, New York State Deparmaent of State, One Commerce Plaza, 99 Washington Avenue, Albany, New York 12231. Telephone (518) 474-6000; Fax (518) 473-2464. This notice is promulgated in accordance with Title 15, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 930. PUBLIC NOTICE Department of State F-2009-0140 Date of Issuance-March 25, 2009 The New York State Department of State (DOS) is required by Federal regulations to provide timely public notice for the activities described below, which are subject to the consistency provisions of the Federal Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended. The applicant has certified that the proposed activity complies with and will be conducted in a manner consistent with the approved New York State Coastal Management Program. The applicant's consis- tency certification and accompanying public information and data are available for inspection at the New York State Department of State of- rices located at One Commerce Plaza, 99 Washington Avenue in Albany, New York. In F-2009-0140, the Fishers Island Yacht Club, located on Central Avenue, Fishers Island, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, is seeking approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers / New York District for several proposed improvements, including the following: · the proposed dredging of ±13,000 cubic yards (cy) of sandy silt with a one foot over-dredge allowance of ±6,000cy by clamshell bucket for a total of approximately 19,000cy of dredged material for open water disposal at the New London Disposal Site (NLDS). · the proposed removal of the existing "A" dock with sailing program float and "B" dock with floating "T" end and dinghy dock. · the proposed construction of a ±36 linear feet (LF) of 7ft wide pier extension and seven ±30fi x 4fl fixed fingers with associated sup- port and tie-off fender piles. · the proposed installation of a ±228fi x 8f~ main float with eigh- teen 20t~ x 3 ft finger floats, a ±216fi x 8fi main float with thirteen 20t~ x 3fl finger floats, two 20fr x 4fl finger floats, two 13fr x 42 and one 19ft x 42ft sail floats, all with associated ramps, restraint piles and tie- off piles. · the proposed reconstruction and/or replacement of an existing 12ft x 20t~ floating dinghy dock waterward of the apparent high water line. · the proposed installation of a small boat crane landward of the ap- parent mean high water line. The stated purpose of the proposal is to maintain accessibility to the existing boat dock basin for recreational boating. Any interested parties and/or agencies desiring to express their views concerning the above proposed activities may do so by filing their comments, in writing, no later than 4:30 p.m., 30 days from the date of publication of this notice, or, Apfil 24, 2009. Comments should be addressed to the Division of Coastal Re- sources and Waterfront Revitalization, New York State Department of State, One Commerce Plaza, 99 Washington Avenue, Albany, New York 12231. Telephone (518) 474-6000; Fax (518) 473-2464. This notice is promulgated in accordance with Title 15, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 930. United States Army Corps of Engineers FISHERS !SLAND 'YACHT CLUB (631) 788-7036 P. O, BOX E FISHERS ISLAND NY 106390 KEITH B. NEiLSON, P.E., DOCKO. iNC. I (86~) 572-8939 P.O. BOX 421 I CT~ 06355 SUFFOLK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 1000-010-1-9 CENTRAL AVENUE o! FISHERS SL,~,ND NY New London-CT-RI-NY WEST HARBOR DuCK ~, O,.~, C/~ ON,~ ,~,-,u DREDGING iN' WEST HARBOR. FISHERS ISLAND. FOR COMPLETE DESCRIPTION, SEE PAGE 1 OF THE APPLICATION DRAWINGS. Rec'd Coastaf Resouroe~ RESET I =ART1.PROJECTINFORMATION 1 APPLiCANT/SPONSOR F.SHERS ~SLAND YACHT CLUB STATE ENVIRONMENTAt QUALITY REVIEW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only ( To be completed by Apphcant or Project Sponsor) 12 ~OJECT NAME DOCK MODIFICATIONS & DREDGING 3 PROJECT LOCATION SUFFOLK TOWN OF SOUTNOLD, FISHERS ISLAND DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: DOCK MODIFICATIONS AND DREDGING IN WEST HARBOR. FISHERS ISLAND. FOR COMPLETE DESCRIPTION. SEE PAGE ! OF THE APPLICATION DRAWINGS. 7 AMOUNi OF LAND AFFECCED Initially 0 acre~ Dllimateiy 0 acres 8 WiLL PRO~ OS~-~ ACTION COMPt. Y WITH EXISTING ZONING OR O~ER RESTRICTIONS? 9 WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE iN VICiNiTY OF pROJECT~ (Choose ss many as apply.) DResiden,a. ~,ndustria. ~Comm,r~al ~Agnc~iture DPark!Fo[est,Op,nSp,c- ~Oth,, (descbe, RESIDENCES TO THE NORTH AND SOUTHWEST O, THE biTE. App~icam ," SFOr sor N~me FISHERS iSLAND YACHT CLUB D~le I'Z complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment PART II - IMPACT ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Lead Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617-47 If yas, c~.~.:;.=[= the ~-.-~.*; v,,..,~c-~, and ase the FULL EAF. I--lyes [--']No B, WIll ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNUSTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.67 if No, a C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED W1TH THE FOLLOWING: (Answem may be handwritten, if legible) C1. ExJMthg ail' quaEty, surface or groundwater quaiit¥ or quan~ty, noise levels, e.~stblg baffic paltem, sotid waste pmduc~on or disposal, ' : ...... : ....... ol ~,~-,,~,~'~ speaas? Explain b~lefly C4. A cornmunity's existing plans ~' goats as officially adored, or a u ,~, q~ m uas ~ C5. L, _~uh,~q,~t develepmenL or ~h=d activiaes likaiy te be '~luced by tbe ~,br,~,.._d action? E-~;.;,,. ' ' ' - · ' ' '~ ~n tsi~q~: C6. Lang te~n, sbe~t tan~, cumuisfive or other ~,lr~-a~ notibent~rled ~n Cl-C5. I I, ,,. ,,., .,,,,. ...... ............ C7. Other i.,F=~ lindnd~n~l chanties ~n use of either cluanlity or type of =,=9~ = '-~rle n bri.,.~. EN~RONMENTAL ARE~ IC~I? E. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? ff yes ~,[* ~ ~ ~-~,,~OF ~.,,..ANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or othelwise significartt. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of Occurring; (¢) duration; (d) irmversibili~; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude, if nec,~___~-3ry, add attachments or reference supporting materials~. Ensure that explanatiops contain sufficient deteil to show that all relevant adverse impacte have been identified a nd adequately addressed. If q uestJon d of part ii was checked yes, the determination of significance must evaluate the potential impact of the proposed action on the environmental characteristics of the CEA. Check thle box if you have identified one or mom potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed di~ to the FULl. FAF and/or prepare a pasil~ve declamfiofl. Check this box If you have determined, based an the information and analysis above and any supporting documentatian, that the proposed actor WILL NOT result in any significant edveme environmental impacts AND provide, on attachments as neceasaiT, the masons supporting thi.~ determination. Name of Lead Agency Date T~e of Responsible Officer Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Oflcer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If dif fem*nt flora responsible officer) NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Federal Co,~;5;,ency Assessment Form F{ec'd Coastar Resources An applicant, seeking a permit, license, waiver, cerl~fication or similar type of approval from a [:,derel agency which is subject to the New York State Coastal Management Program (CMP, shall complete this assessment form for any proposed activity that will occur within and/or directly affect the State's Coastal Area. This form is intended to assist an applicant in certifying that the proposed activity is consistent with New York State's CMP as required by U.S. Department of Commerce regulations (15 CFR 930.57(. It should be comp01eted at the time when the federal apPlication is prepared. The Department of State will use the completed form and accompanying information in its review of the applicant's cerlificatien'of consistency. A. APPLICANT 1. Name: FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB 2. Address: P.O. BOX E, FISHERS iSLAND, NY 06390 3. Telephone: Area Code (631) 788-7036, (860) 572-8939 DOCKo, INC., A,qent B. PROPOSED ACTIVITY 1. Brief description of activity: DREDGE 13,000 (+/-) CY OF SANDY SILT WFi'H A 1-FT. OVERDREDGE ALLOWANCE OF 6,000 (+/-) CY OVER 145,000 (+/-) SF BY CLAMSHELL BUCKET FOR OPEN WATER DISPOSAL AT NEW LONDON (NLDS). REMOVE EXISTING "A" DOCK WITH SAILING PROGRAM FLOAT, "B" DOCK 0=IER) WITR FI_L)I lNG ~ E'N'D AND DINGHY DOCK, CO~ 36 (+1-) LF OF 7-FT. WiDE MAIN PIER EXTENSION AND SEVEN 30 (+/-) LF X 4-FT. WIDE FIXED FINGERS WITH ASSOCIATED SUPPORT AND TIE-OFF/FENDER PILES. INSTALL 228 (+t-) LF OF 8-FT. WIDE MAIN FLOAT WITH EIGHTEEN 20 LF X 3-FT. WIDE FINGER FLOATS, 216 (+1-) LF OF 8-FT.WIDE MAIN FLOAT WITH THIRTEEN 20 LF X 3-FT. WIDE FINGER FLOATS, 'P, NO 20 LF X 4-FT FINGER FLOATS, TWO 13-FT. X 42-FT AND ONE 19-FT. X 42-FT. SAIL FLOATS ALL WITH ASSOCIATED RAMPS, RESTRAINT PILES AND TiE-OFF / FENDER PILES, RECONSTRUCT OR REPLACE AN EXISTING 12' X 20' FLOATING DINGHY DOCK WATERWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER LINE. INSTALL A SMALL BOAT CRANE LANDWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER LINE. 2. Purpose of activity: BOATING. MAINTAIN ACCESSIBILITY TO THE EXISTING BOAT DOCK BASIN FOR RECREATIONAL 3. Location of activity: FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB ON WEST HARBOR SUFFOLK FISHERS ISLAND, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CENTRAL AVENUE County City, Town or Village Street or Site Description Type of federal permit / license required: U.S. ACOE. NYS DEC,3'OWN OF SOUTHOLD Federal application number, if known: Pendinq If s state permit / license was issued or is required for the proposed activity, identify the state agency and provide the application or permit number, if known: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, US ACOE, NYS DEC. COASTAL ASSESSMENT Check either "YES" or "NO" for each of the following questions. The numbers following each question refer to the policies described in the CMP document (see footnote on page 2) which may be affected by the proposed activity. 1. W~ ~prop0sed activity result in any of the following: a. Large physical change to a site within the coastal area which will require the preparation of an environmental impact statement?. (11,22, 25, 32, 37, 38, 41,43) .................... b. Physical alteration of more than two acres of land along the shoreline, land under water or coastel waters? (2, 11, 12, 20, 28, 35, 44) ........................................ c. Revitalization / redevelopment of a deteriorated or underutilized waterfront site? (1) ....... d. Reducfionofexistingorpotenfia{-publicaccasstoorat~gcoeetal--,-,.=tcrs? (19, 20) ...... e. Adverse effect upon the commercial or recreational use of coastal fish resources? (9,10)... f. Siting of a facility essential to the exploration, development and production of energy resources in coastal waters or on the Outer Continental Shelf?. (29) .................. g. Siting of a facility eSSential to the generation or transmission of energy? (27) ........... h. Mining, excavation, or dredging activities, or the placement of dredged or fill material in co.3~t.~atem? (15, 35)_ .................................................. i. Discharge of toxics, hazardous substances or other pollutants into coastal waters?(8,15,35) j. Draining of stormwater runoff or sewer overflows into coastal waters? (33) ............. k. Transport, storage, tre~,,ent, or disposal of solid wastes or hazardous materials? (36, 39). I. Adverse effect upon land or water uses within the State's small harbors? (4) ........... YES NO X X X X X X X X X X X X 2. Will the proposed activity affect or be located in, on, or adjacent to any of the following: a. State designated freshwater or tidal wetland? (44) ................................. b. Federally designated flood and / or state designated erosion hazard area? (11,12,17) .... c. State designated significant fish and I or wildlife habitat?. (7) ......................... d. Stated~e(tsigaifica~sceaicmsotm:eoram~? (26) ........................... e. State designated important agricultural lands? (26) ................................ f. Beach, dune or barrier island? (12) ............................................. -- g. Major ports of Albany, Buffalo, Ogdensburg, Oswego or New York? (3) ................ h. State, country, orlocalpark? (19,20) ........................................... i. Historic resource listect o-ri the. National o~ Stat~ Registe~ of Histodc Places? (23) .......... __ X X X X X X X X X 3. Will the proposed activity require any of the following: a. Watar/rontsite? (2, 21, 22) .................................... b. Provision of new public services or infrastructure in undeveloped or sparsely populated sections of the coastal area? (5) ............................................. c. Constructio~orreconstructionofafloodoremaioncontrotsb, ucture?(13, 14, 15). ...... d. State water quality permit or certification? (30, 38, 40) ............................ e. State air quality permit or certification? (41, 43) ................................. X X X X X 4. Wilt the proposed activity occur within and / or affect an ama covered by a State approved Local waterfront revitalization program? (see policies in local program document) ......... X D. ,-?..,~,~ ~ ,',JNA.~ STEPS i. If all of the questions ir~ Section C are answered "NO", then tl;e applicant or &gency shall complete Section E and Sub the documentation required by Section F. , ~ny of the questions m oe~,.~n ,=,e ~,,s,~,e,e~ , ,..S , ,h~,, '~ .... "~""' ...... ' .... ' ~ or where appropna(e. ¢~e ~cBi .wStedront rev~izat?~n program d~ument The proposed active, must be anal~ed in more detail with res~ct to t~ appli~ble s~te or Io~1 coastal ~ticies. In the space provided ~low by , '~ ~"~ activity is consistent with each ~licy. Following the comp eton of this wri~en assessment, the applicant or agency shal complet~ Sect on E and submit E. CERTIFICATION waterfront revitalization program, as appropriate. If this certification cannot be made, the proposed activity shall not be undo(taken. If this certification can be made. complete ti~is Section. 'Tile p;uposed ad:wLy cumpi~es with New York State s approved Coastal Management Program, or w~th tt~e appticabie approved local waterfront revitalization program, and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such program.'~ , ,~, ,~_,,,5 ,,.,,.AN,., Y, ,., T CLUB Address: P.O. E FISHERS ISLAND NY 063.90 Telephone: Area Code (63I) 788-7036 Date: F. S~U_B_M! S~!O~,% REQ U i R EM E NTS 1. The applicant or agent shall submit the foflowing documents to the New York State Department of State Division a. Originalsigned form. b. Copy of the completed federal agency application. 2. '[he applicant or agent shall also submit a copy of this completed form a!ong with his i her application [o the federal agency 3. f there are any ouestions regarding the submission of this form. contact the Department of State at (518) 474-6000 SEE ATTACHED NARRATIVE Environmental Conservation and Department of State regional offices, and the appropriate regional and county planning agencies. Local program documents are also availab!e for inspection at the offices of the appropriate local *3- FCAF Revised I216/93 N/F P~.OPEI~Y iU]'<'':' :OF ~HAP. P ~ N,,'F PP. OPE~Pr' OF I~LAND CORPORATION ~-.OJECT': NO~:"rHFOI~,!D. CT 0~-72 FIE:~=P-~ IE~_AN O, NY 0~390 I::';~-OJECT: DOCK i"IO~:DIFICATION.~ and [DI~EIiD~IN~ LOC~'RON: DAT~WAT~ ~WAY: G APPLICANT: A~ENT: ~ ~. N~n. ~ ' ~ ~2 8~39 F~ ~0 ~2 756~ ~ 0~1~/8 · ~I'T~' FISH ~12-.~ I~LAND YACHT CLUE, PAJ~N~ '1 E,D<3;E OF N/F PP. OPER'T'¥ OF ~OOCE ICLAND ~TOCKaOE WETLANP LJMIT ,-POCK LINE MOO~N(~ ~LE REMOVE / i'iAIN BASIN "[XED I::'IE~ ~ P~OJECT: lgOCt~ t"IODIFICATION~ ond LOCA~ON: FI~HEP,.~ I~L..C~ND. TOVVN OF .~OUTHOLD COUNTY OF ~UFFOLK. NEW WAT'-~:%VA¥: 'WE.~T .HAP-JSOR ~ DAT~ JANUAEY 2, 2008, .~I2tJCANT: ~m,,~ H EP-,,.~ ~LANID ¥/~,C HT CLUB A~ENq-: SHEET 2 OF 7 EDOCKO, INC. -5 OP-~E TO -5 ~LV~ LOCATION: TOWN OF ,9OUTHOLO COUN'~F OF ~UFF-OLK, N~'Vv' ,vol~-K N, VA'~I~:'fVAY: ~T ~ ~ _~ JANUA~¢ 2 CLUB ~H~ 3 OF 7 OQCKO, lNG. ~c, ~ ~ FAG~ I FOOTI~NT OF PP. OpO~.D I ? I=:='I_.~,~N I \ / I:::'P. OJEC'"T:/~OC/( i'qOI?IFI~ATION~ and FI~EI~..~ L.~JqD. TO'~VN OF ~OUTHOL~ SUFFOLK G~, N~ YO~K J~U~ ~ 2~ ~HE~ 4 OF 7 DQCKO, INC. ~c, ~ / ~ / / I / :7%~__ ......... ~ - .......................................... ~. ~ ~ ~~ ~ ...... ~--~ ..............~ ............. ~ ........ SECTION ~--~ I I t I I 'l SECTION A--A I I I I I PROJECT: LOCA~ON: FI..~HEI2.5 15LAND, TO'CON OF ,~OUTHOLD COUNTY OF 5U~O~ N~ Y~ WA~AY: ~T ~0~ ~ DA~ J~U~ 2 ~O~ ~lC~: ~HE~ ~5DD Y~hZ ~H~ 5 OF 7 DQCKO, lNG. 572 ~99~ f~ ~O ~2 7~9 ~G O0~1~ E~ ~s~.~ EvNLIN~ ~- FLOAT~ - ~ .SALI~OAT 6 "/' -~,~MP +~ ~,Z' FO(ED FIN~EI,~ FLOAT w~fh ', I.~UNOH R.,~'IP AD,,~O::..NT TO ,~DOGK ?0 BE P. EI',NNED I~aOJEGT: DO(:T.K I~IODIFICAT'ION~ ond DI~OGING LOCATION: TOS~'N OF .~OL,'THOLD COUNTY OF ~UFFOLK, NB'O,/YO~K WA'TE~:'A/AY: PATE: JANUAk:~r' ~: R~ I~D Y~ CLUB ~E~: ~HE~ ~ ~ 7 DOCKO, INC. ~0 572 ~9~ I N,~,.V ~ NEVV ~'L.OA T WEST ~ N_~-'W' t~-FT X ~AIL FLOAT~ NE"W F'L~A T I~11~ TO,~ ~ 1'7'= GONGP~-'T~ ~'I..OAT , I::'P. OJEGT: [~OGI~. i~IOI~IFICATION~ and I-CC;ATION: TC:~v'N OF ~OUTHOLD COUNTY OF ~LJFFOL.K. N~V YO~K WA~AY: ~V~T DATE JAN U. AAff' 2, CLUB ~HE~ 7 OF ~ B. Nei~, FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB WEST HARBOR, FISI-W~RS ISLAND NARRATIVE STATEMENT & SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION JANUARY 19, 2009 GENERAL Fishers Island Yacht Club leases parcel 1000-010-1-9, own&l by the Fishers Island Development Company, off of Central Avenue located along the west shore of WeSt Harbor on Fishers Island. _The site is flat to gently sloped, sandy, gravel earthen matedais, vegetated with grass, bmsh, ground cover and trees. The frontage of the property is approximately 300 feet along West Harbor abutted by the Goose Island Corporation to the east and Mr. & Mrs. Gregory Sharp to the west. The waterfront consists of a rock revetment lined shore along the north, tidal wetlands fi'inge vegetation at the base ofthe gently sloped tree-lined terrace to the south of the pier. It is the Fishers Island Yacht Club's desire to make dock modifications to their piers and floating dock system south of the main pier and dredge to optimize the geometry and usefulness of the dock facilities. Attached are application drawings prepared for this project. This supplemental narrative has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Town of Southold, Ordinance No. 6, 2004, and the Waterfront Revitalization Program related to docks and shorefront improvements. In addition, various coastal policies under the New York State Coastal Management Act are addressed herein for review by the New York State Department of State and Department of Environmental Conservation. DESCRIPTION OF WORK The project is to replace various wood floating docks with concrete floating docks and finger piers, make minor modifications to the fixed pier at the southeast end of the dock facilities and dredge 13,000 (+/-) CY of marine sandy silts mechanically over an area of 145,000 (+/-) SF with a one-foot overdredge allowance of 6,000 (+/-) CY for open water disposal at the New London open water disposal are (NLDS) in Long Island Sound in accordance with existing guidelines set forth by the US Army Corps of Engineers (NY and New England Regions), the NYS DEC, NYS DOS and the Town of Southold. It is envisioned that the pier structures will be built utilizing the following general sequence and methodology. The marine contractor will arrive by water with barge-mounted crane and push boat or tug and work boats or dredge scow. LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION POLICIES The Town of Southold, LWRP policies that are applicable to the Fishers Island Yacht Club dock extension are a local refinement of the Long Island Sound Regional Coastal Management Program policies that apply throughout Long Island Sound under the Coastal Zone Management program administered by the NYS Depadment of State. The site is in West Harbor on Fishers Island and is characterized as Developed Coast on the east shore at the Hay Harbor Club site to the parcel north and south shore and currently undeveloped coast or natural coast on the west shore The developed coast policies are applicable as follows: Policy 1 is to foster a pattern of development that enhances community character and preserves natumt resources to the maximum extent and minimizes adverse impacts on the environment, Policy 2 is to preserve historic resources, Policy 3 is to enhance and protect SCenic resources and visual quality. The proposed dock modifications are consistent with waterfront development on Fishers Island and in coastal areas. The proposed work is reconstruction, conversion (of B Dock) and expansion of existing piers and floats. The pier will be made of timbers and utilizes the materials allowable under Town of Southold Local Law #6 and consistent with other adjacent dock facilities and characteristics for the visual and scenic considerations in the harbor. The encroachment has been minimized to the maximum possible extent to be consistent with DEC policies and the structures are as Iow profile as possible consistent with the safe and efficient use of the waters and consistent with the boating seasons tidal range of this site. NATURAL COAST POLICIES The Natural Coastal Policies are 4 through 8 and require consideration as follows: Policy 4 - Minimize loss of life, structures and natural resources from flooding and erosion, Policy 5 - Protect and improve water quality Policy 6 - Protect and restore the quality and function of the eeo-system, Policy 7 - Protect and improve air quality, Policy 8 - Minimize environmental degradation primarily from solid waste and hazardous substances. The proposed floating dock and pier reconfiguration has been laid out so as to be consistent with the DEC permit requirements for such structures. As such, it provides adequate height to clear environmental resources of concern and the materials to be utilized are consistent with Town of Southold's Local Law #6 regarding environmental quality and the use of pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine timber components in particular. There will be no adverse impacts on air quality as a result of these dock facilities. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9 sets forth a priority to provide for public access and recreational use of coastal waters, public lands and public resources of the Town. This project maintains recreational boating facilities and so is consistent with this policy. 3 WORKING COAST POLICIES The policies of this sec/ion relate to the ~llowing: Policy 10 - Protection of the Town's water-dependent uses and promoting new water- dependent uses in suitable locations, Policy 11 - Promoting sustainable use of living marine resources, Policy 12 - Protect agricultural lands, Policy 13 - Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. While most of the Working Coast Policies are not applicable to this site or this type of project, Policy 10, promoting water-dependent uses and the citing of water-dependent uses in appropriate areas is applicable and the proposed project makes the most beneficial use of the land and dock facilities: This project has been laid out with specific reference to and review of the Waterfront Revitalization Program policies and is considered to be consistent. DREDGING In summary, the proposed dock modifications, repair and reconstruction is typical of recreational boating facilities throughout the area and all along coastal New England. The structures have been minimized in size, height, and structure so as to be consistent with other facilities ora similar nature and the minimum necessary components to accommodate safe and efficient boating operations from this site. This project does not interfere with public access or use of public trust waters and lands of the State, it does not interfere with navigation, it will not create soil or sedimentation and dredging will not create erosion problems, in fact, the wood retaining structure should help minimize bank erosion. The pier reconstruction does not adversely affect environmental resources in the area where the facility must span the shallow sub-tidal zone at the shore line, the facility retains its alignment in the area where. environmental resources have already been diminished so as not to worsen any of these conditions. The height of the structure has been maintained so as to allow vegetation growth along the shoreline by tidal wetlands plants if other conditions are conducive to such growth. The float re-alignment has also been configured reaching out to deep water thus further minimizing adverse environmental impacts. There is no loss of valuable marine and wetland habitat and no water quality degradation as a result of this project. Reference is made to the NYS DEC study from 2000 indicating the suitability of pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine piles and super-structure components for this type of purpose. In accordance with Town of Southold Local Law #6, decking for the floats and the pier and the ramp treads will be of woods or materials other than CCA pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine. No natural protective features or processes will be adversely impacted as a result of the proposed dock work. Tlfis project is co~xsistent with zoning policies and ordinances for the Town. There will be no development of the upland related to this dock facility that will create point sources of pollution or drainage. The floating docks are the miuimal size for stability considerations especially acknowledging the loading and waves from West Harbor and the floating docks are broadside to those waves. The float is suitably sized and adequate stable for a ramp landing and the ramp has been made no longer than necessary in order to minimize the pier structure and maximize boating access (slips). 4 REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 97-25 OF THE WETLANDS LAW 6~ 2004 The permittee acknowledges that the validity of this permit is subject to the approval of other governmental or municipal authorities. The permittee does, by the acceptance of this permit, assume all responsibility for operations undertaken pursuant to this pem~it, and shall take all precautions for the prevention of injuries to persons and property resulting from such operations. By such acceptance, the permittee also agrees to indemnify and save harmless the Town of Southold and its officers. The permittee gives consent to the Town and its officers, employees and agents to enter upon the premises where such operations are being conducted to make such inspections to determine whether said operations are being conducted in conformity with the permit. The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing one week prior to initiation of any and all operations. The pennittee will notify the Trustees in writing upon completion of operations such that the site can be inspected for issuance for a certificate of compliance. In response to Sub-section 2a and the General Rules for Standards of Residential and Commercial Docks, the following additional information is offered. Permits for the work are being applied for through the Town, US ACOE, NYS DEC and a coastal zone consistency determination by the NYS DOS. The new piles to be installed will be of sturdy, durable and stable materials; in all likelihood, Greenhart or CCA Type III pressure-txeated Southern Yellow Pine (SYP) piles with new split caps and braces of the stone SYP materials. These members will be a minimum of 3 x 8's and more often, 3 x 10's with at least one ~A" bolt per connection, and in many cases, two ~" bolts per connection. This pier is a fixed, pile-supported timber structure with a float and therefore will not adversely affect the free circulation of water or reduce the effects of fluctuating water levels in West Harbor. In addition, the pier does not present any adverse modification of the shoreline. The pier's elevation is such that in extreme high flood tides the structure will be inundated. The structure's SYP timber materials are specifically grown for tiffs purpose and are capable of withstanding full inmaersion; they represent the standard of the industry for marine construction. With the connections described above, this structure will be able to survive repeated inundations and even direct waves at lfigh tide elevations with a. structural life of 10 to 20 years. The pier support will include dri,Sng new piles at regular intervals to the maximum extent possible in order to obtain the desired pier alignment and support intervals. The use of CCA pressur$-treated piles and timbers can be approved for this project in accordance with Local Law 6. 5 The pier and new floats will not be decked with CCA pressure-treated Southern Pine, This pier extension provides a safe pedestrian surface for access to the sail boats and motor boats. Forty-two inch mils may be installed on the overland section of the pier for safety. The 15-foot clearance specified in this paragraph should not be an issue because the reconstruction and expansion is basically parallel to shore and does not project into the navigation way for other boaters in the harbor or adjacent docks. Upon receipt of the permit for this project, appropriate permit numbers and a Town permit placard will be affixed to the most seaward face of the pier for identification fi.om the water. There are no permanent structures located above .the pier decking, nor are any planned at this time other than the power posts and railing which are fi.xed by function and designed for this environment. It is currently possible to provide a passage way to the upland via the south ramp to get around the pier and that access ability will be retained. There is approximately four feet of clearance to walk under the pier at low tide, however, foot traffic in this area is rare, if at all. NEW YORK STATE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM These application documents include a copy of the Federal Consistency Assessment Forua utilized for the New York State Coastal Management Program under the jurisdiction of the New York State Department of State. The following policies have been identified as pertinent to this application and the reason for consistency associated with this project is outlined in each respective case. Policy 2 -Water Dependent Uses - This project is to repair, restore and, to aN extent, re- configure a fully functional water dependent use, a recreational boating dock facility at this site in support of recreational boating and sailing instruction. Policy 5 - Use of Existing Developed Shorefront - There is developed shoreline on this site. This project utilizes existing shorefi.ont which has been altered by the long-standing facilities. The project will be to re-build, repair, re-configure existing dock facilities to make them safe and reliably usable in most weather conditions. Policy 7 - Significant Fish & Wildlife Habitat - Protection of significant fish and wildlife habitat has been considered in the development of this project layout. The pier to the shoreward point of beginning is over the rocky, vegetated shoreline fringe and above the rocky intertidal sediments and should not jeopardize the integrity of existing vegetation, although such is scarce, primarily rockweed. Typically there is a slight environmental benefit to the project because of the structure in the water column which barnacles, algae and crustaceans will inhabit and the structures provide protection primarily for juvenile fish. 6 Policy 8 - Protection & Preservation of Habitat - Protection and preservation of habitat has also been considered in this project and the dock structure is being kept to its minimal configuration and of materials consistent with standards of: the industry and restrictions set forth in the Wetlands Law, No. 6, 2004 set forth by the To~ of Southold and standards of the NYS DEC. Policy 11 - Minimize Damage to Natural Resources - The dock construction project has been laid out in such a way- so as to minimize damage to natural resources as identified in Policy 7 above. The pier reconstruction has been sited in the area where the existing pier and floating dock facilities have existed for decades. The dredging is proposed to maintain current and future boating activities while minimizing adverse impacts such as bottom sediment re- suspension due to propeller contact or thrust induced erosion. Dredging has been stepped progressively; higher coming into the basin where smaller boats will dominate the mix, with shallower drafts. Policy 14 - No Measurable Increase'in Flooding - This project consists of construction of an open wood pile and timber pier which in no wey adversely affects waterflow mad circulation in Hay Harbor or flooding potential of the area. Flood levels all around Fishers Island are dictated by water levels in Long Island Sound, Fishers Island Sound and Block Island Sound and the structures will have no adverse influence on those levels. Policy 15 - No New Dredging - Maintenance dredging is proposed in this project. Suspended marine silts have aecmnulated in this "dead end" of West Harbor for decades. The bottom depths are such that dredging is required to maintain viable access. This project has utilized a stepped configuration from the east to west to minimize the volume of material to be removed and deep water depths similar to the existing conditions. Repeated shallow water benthic studies in sandy mud to silty marina sediments have shown stressed populations of crustaceans and mollusks which inhabit these sediments and that they re-colonize and re-populate within a year or so of the dredging work. Increasing the water depth will tend to diminish the re- suspension impacts on the habitat and these colonies of creatures and so it is felt that the one- time disturbance, occurring in accordance with seasonal shellfish spawning restrictions will ultimately provide the proper balance between environmental concerns and the Coastal Zone Policies to foster recreational boating facilities and opportunities. The New England Regional Office of the USACOE has issued a suitability determination allowing for open-water disposal of dredge sediments from this project at NLDS (New London). Policy 19 - Imnact on Public Access - Public access will not be jeopardized or impeded as a result of this project. As a matter of fact, there is almost no public access usage of the public trust lands or waters at this site. There is no Federal channel to Fishers Island Yacht Club. The intertidal zone in the dock facility area is significantly covered by boulders with tidal wetlands fringe marsh vegetation to the south. The Fishers Island Yacht Club pier and floats occupy far tess than the landward 25% of the waterway (West Harbor) width in accordance with US ACOE policies. Thus, public access to the State's lands and waters will not be adversely affected by the project. Policy 20 - Public Trust Compatibility with Existing Adioining Properties and Land Uses- Public Trust compatibility- with existing adjoining properties and land uses have also been considered in this project. Several nearby properties have small docking facilities and this docking facility will not interfere with existing or the likely configuration of future facilities on immediately adjoining properties or the logical allocation of littoral development rights in this part of West Harbor. These piers are long-standing structures. Policy 21 - Water Dependent Recreation - This project is consistent with water-dependent recreational opportunities policies set forth in this section. Polie~- 24 -Scenic Resomues, Impaimaent or Loss - This policy is designed to prevent impairment or loss of scenic resources. The reconstruction of the fixed wood pile and timber pier are float reconstruction and reconfiguration and will not represent a new encroachment or structure which would create a Io~ of scenic resources. The elevated inboard landing section of the pier will be largely over-shadowed by the phragmitae growth, the spartiua fi-inge marsh on the site. The one property ovmer most likely to be impacted is the cottage of Gregory and Pemsi Sharp just west offlae club and they do not object to the proposed project. Policy 25 - Enhance Overall-Scenic Quali~ - The pier and floats will be consistent with the scenic qualit3, of the area and will not diminish scenic resources as described in Policy 24 above. Policy 44 - Preserve and Protect Tidal Wetlands - It is acknowledged that the fragmented fringe marsh of spartina altema flora along the shorefront is a valuable resource. The floating dock and fixed wood pile and timber pier work in this project has taken advantage of the existing un-vegetated strip of the shoreline caused by the existing pier in Order to avoid adverse wetlands impact. The height of the pier should allow oppommities for the growth of tidal vegetation but that has not thus far occurred. No changes to the pier are proposed in this area naturally up to, and to an extent, beneath the wood pier. This project proposes the repair, expansion and reconstruction ora long-standing pier and recontiguration of floats and dredging in an existing, long-standing facility for community-wide recreational boating access. A copy of all US Army Corps of Engineers, NYS DEC and Town of Southold applications are attached as substantiation for and in support of this project. A dredging suitability determination has been made by the US Army Corps of Engineers, New England Regional Office, for open-water disposal at the New London Open Water Disposal site (NLDS). This project complies with applicable standards of the New York State Coastal Management Act, NYS / DEC Tidal Wetland Regulations and criteria for approval, the Town of Southold Waterfront Revitalization Program and Local Ordinance No. 6, 2004, and its approval is respectfully requested. RespectfiaIly sul:[mitted, DO, CKO, INC. ~ Keith B. Neilson, P.E. GO~$E WESt ~GREAT HARI~OR) 5.1 TAX ASSESSOR'S MAP 010, SECTION 1, LOT 9 PROJECT: WATERWAY: LOCATION: A~-PLtCANT:. DATE: AGENT: "DOCK MODIFICATIONS & DREDGING" WEST HARBOR FISHERS ISLAND, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK FISHERS iSLAND YACHT CLUB JANUARY 2, 2008 DOCKO, INC. i P~OJECT: WATERWAY: LOCATION: APPLICANT: DATE: AGENT: LOCATION MAP "DOCK MODIFICATIONS & DREDGING" WEST HARBOR FISHERS ISLAND, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD S~tFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB JANUARY 2, 2008 DOCKO, INC. 23 SOU, Sil~zr Eel-)~ov¢ ~ Harbo.r ~ lizabeth Field I~I~HEI~ I~LAND YA~H'I ~ULUH DOCK MODIFICATIONS & DREDGING PHOTOGRAPHS ABOVE: TH1S PHOTOGRAPHS SHOWS THE FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB LOOKING OUT TO THE EAST DOWN THE MAIN DOCK WTYH THE SAIL BOAT LAUNCH FACILITIES FIRST ON THE RIGHT, FOLLOWD BY "A' DOCK, "B" DOCK AND "E" DOCK IN THE BACKGROUND. BOATS CAN BE SEEN TIED UP ON THE DINGHY DOCK BETWEEN "A" DOCK AND "B" DOCK. DOCK MODIFICATIONS & DREDGING PHOTOGRAPHS ABOVE: THIS PHOTOGRAPH SHOWS THE SHORELINE FEATURES LOOKING TO THE SOUTIt~VEST OF THE SITE PAST TIDAL WETLANDS VEGETATION ON THE YACHT CLUB PROPERTY AS WELL PENNI SHARP'S PROPERTY WITH THE TREES IN THE BACKGROUND. FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB DOCK MODIFICATIONS & DREDGING PHOTO'GRAPHS ABOVE: THIS PHOTOGRAPH SHOWS "A" DOCK IN ITS CURRENT CONFIGURATION WITH A FIXED PIER LEADING TO A FLOATING CONCRETE DOCK WHICH HINGED RAMP ACCESS. WHAT IS MISSING IN THIS PHOTOGRAPH IS THE SAILING PROGRAM DOCK WHICH NORMALLY LAYS ADJACENT TO AND TO THE RIGHT OF THE FLOAT. SAILBOATS PARTICII~ATING IN THE SAILING PROGRAM THAT ARE LAUNCHED ON A DALLY BASIS ARE LAUNCH FROM THE RAMP IN THE FOREGROUND (LOWER RIGHT) AND THAN BROUGHT UP ONTO THE SAILING PROGRAM FLOAT AFTER THE DAY'S ACTIVITIES. THE WATERS IN THE VICINITY OF "A" DOCK AS RECONFIGURED, WILL BE DREDGED TO -4 FEET AT MEAN LOW WATER. FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB DOCK MODIFICATIONS & DREDGING PHOTOGRAPHS ABOVE: THIS PHOTOGRAPH TAKEN FROM "E" DOCK LOOKING TO TIlE NORTHWEST SHOWS THE FIXED PEER AND FINGER PIERS AT "B'? DOCK. "A" DOCK IS BARELY DISCERNABLE IN THE BACKGROUND WHERE THE PIER CAN BE SEEN JUST ABOVE AND TO THE RIGHT OF THE CENTER OF THE PHOTOGRAPH. THIS PIER AND FINGER PIERS VglLL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A FLOATING DOCK SYSTEM IN THE ULTIMATE PLAN. THE WATERS BETWEEN "E' DOCK AND *'B' DOCK WILL BE DREDGED TO -5 THE WATERS BETWEEN "B" AND "A" DOCK AND IN THE V1CINITY OF THE DINGHY DOCK, WILL BE DREDGED TO -4 FEET. DOCK MODIFICATIONS & DREDGING PHOTOGRAPHS ABOVE: THIS PHOTOGRAPH SHOWS THE TIE-OFF AND RESTRAINT PILES THAT ARE UTILIZED FOR THE "T" END DOCK SYSTEMS FOR BOTH "A" AND "B" DOCK. THESE PILES WILL ALL BE REMOVED WHEN THE NEW FLOATING DOCK FACILITIES ARE INSTALLED. THIS AREA WILL BE DREDGED TO A DEPTH OF 5 FEET BELOW MEAN LOW WATER FOR THE WATERS IN THE FOREGROUND, AND TO 4 FEET BELOW MEAN LOW WATER FOR THE WATERS AROUND "A" DOCK tN THE BACKGROUND. FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB DOCK MODIFICAT. IONS& DREDGING PHOTOGRAPHS ABOVE: THIS PHOTOGRAPH SHOWS THE END OF THE FIXED PIER FACILITIES AT THE NORTH END OF "E" DOCK LOOKING STRAIGHT WEST TOWARD THE YACHT CLUB DOCK MANAGER'S HOUSE AND CLUB HOUSE. THIS AREA W~ILL BE DREDGED TO -7 IN THE MAIN BASIN, AND TO -8 FEET 1N THE FOREGROUND BETWEEN THE END OF THE PIER AND THE POSITION WHERE THE PHOTOGRAPH WAS TAKEN FROM. FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB DOCK MODIFICATIONS & DREDGING · PHOTO.GRAPHS ABOVE: THIS PHOTOGRAPH SHOWS THE CORNER OF THE PARKING / FLOATING DOCK STORAGE AREA ADJACENT TO THE GOOSE ISLAND PROPERTY ON THE NORTH END OF THE SITE. THE GOOSE ISLAND BUILDING IS SHOWN IN THE BACKGROUND IN THE UPPER RIGHTHAND CORNER OF THE PHOTO. THE POINT OF LAND WHERE THE STONE REVETMENT TURNS FROM EAST ! WEST TO NORTH / SOUTH ALONG THE RIGHT EDGE OF THE PHOTOGRAPH, IS THE AREA WHERE THE PROPOSED BOAT CRANE IS TO BE INSTALLED. FROM THIS POINT, THE CLUB WILL BE ABLE TO EASILY HOIST BOATS AND SET THEM ON TRAILERS OR CARTS SO THAT THEY CAN BE WHEELED INTO STORAGE POSITIONS AS NECESSARY. October 07, 2008 Docko, Inc. P.O. Box 421 Mystic. CT 06355 Attn: Mr, Keith Neilson Fl[ F Please find attached laboratory report(s) for the samples submitted on: July 17, 2008. ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS FOR NY STATE SUBMITTED ON OCTOBER 07, 2008. All pertinent information for this analysis is located on the report. Should it be necessary to contact us regarding billing or the test results, please have the following information readily available: Lab No. - 0708483 PO/Job No. : FIYC Invoice No. 155407 Customer No. :1563 Please contact us if you have any questions. Very trul~ Ste~ ~' F~oo Laboratory Director PH-0547 %tconn .ecticut estlng . laboratories -- WATER SOIL AIR Rec'd Coasta! Resouroes STEPHEN l- FRANCO Laboratory Director PHONE 203/634-3731 www.ctl-web.com / ctestlab@ero[s.com 165 GRC, CEY AVENUE MERIDEN, CT 0645l CASE NARRATIVE Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. prepared for: Docko, Inc: Ordertt: 0708483 PO Box 421 Project: FIYC Mystic, CT 06355 The following samples were received as indicated below and on the attached Chain 6f Cus'tody record. All analyses '¢,ere performed x~Sthin the holding time and with acceptable qualit3 conn'ol results unless othem, ise noted. SAMPLE ID LAB ID ! .... ~M:A~~ ! Date Collected Date Received .FIYCI 0000013-662 SEDIMENT-- ~--'-0~1~)0~ 07/17/20~8--- FIYC2 ...... -0~}0i 3~663 ~'~ ........ SEDIMENT 05)t~/2~0~ - 07)]5/2008" FIYC3 0000013-664 SEDIMENT 07/16/2008 07/17/2008 FIYC4 0000013-665 SEDIMENT 07/16/2008 i 07/17/2008 ? FIYC5 0000013-666 SEDIMENT 07/16/2008 07/17~008 Comp;site 1,2 &3 - -b'~00013-~67 'SE%mEN7" 05i1~-)2008 ~ 07/'1~-008 Composite 4 & 5 0000013-668 SEDIMENT 07/16/2008 07/17/2008 The following are Surrogate recoveries EPA Method 1613B: 37CI4-2378-TCDD - Surrogate Percent Recovery CTL # 13667 - 83% CTL # 13668 - 86% Method Blank - 88% Lab Control Sample - 88°/. EPA Method 1613B Toxic Equivalent Quantitation (TEQ): Sample # TEQ CTL # 13667 3.35 CTL # 13668 1.9 The enclo~d results of analyses are repm~ntative of the samples ~ received bv the laboratory. Connecticu! Tesling La~ori~. Inc. m~cs no reprc~ntations or cenifi~tions ~ to ~e melho~ ~f ~ple ~lle~tion, ~mple idenfificalion, or ~n~*~tion handling_ pro~ums u~d prior to our re~ipt ofsmples, lb the ~st of m) knowledge, the info~ation conmi~d in ~is m~n is accumt~~ Conn~ficut T~tin~ La~raiori~. Inc. Page Date Samples Received: 7/17/08 Client Name: Docko, Inc. CTL Lab No,: 0708483 Report Date: 10/7/08 PO/Job No. : FIYC RESULTS OF ANALYSIS Washed Sieve Analysis ASTM D-422/D-1140 Date Analyzed: 71t8108 Matrix Type: S S S S CTL Sa m pie No.: 12646 12647 t 2648 12649 Field ID: FIYC-1 FIYC-2 FIYC-3 FIYC-4 Percent by Wt. Passing Sieve Size No. 4 99.7 I 99.5 I 99.6 No. 10 98.6 98.6 98.6 No. 40 93.1 96.1 96.7 No. 200 87.1 93.3 94.7 99.6 96.2 38.4 Matrix Type: CTL Sample No.: Field ID: Percent by 'Wt. Passing Sieve Size S S 12650 t2646 FIYC-5 FIYC-1 Duplicate No. 10 99.7 98.5 No. 40 94.4 93.5 No. 200 40.2 88.7 MDL= Method Detection Level/BDL= Below Detection Level Matrix Type: W= Water/Aqueous S= Soil/Solid O= Oil/Hydrocarbon Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. 165 Gracey Avenue I Meriden, CT 06451 (203) 634-373t (Fax) 630-1.336 Certification CT-PH0547/MA-CT035 Date Samples Received 07117/2008 Client Narr~: Docko, Inc. CTL Lab No.: 0708483 PO No: FIYC Report Date: 10/07/2008 Analyst: SJF RESULTS OF ANALYSIS Bulk Sediment TOC/Water Matrix Type: SEDIMENT SEDIMENT CTL Sample No.: 13667 13668 Field ID: Composite 1, 2 Composite 4 & 5 Date & 3 Tested Pammetera RL Total Organic Carbon-% 08/04/2008 1 0,10 Total Organic Carbon-duplicate-% 08/04~2008 0.10 Total Water-% 07/31/2008 0,01 Method # 3.10 1.20 - _ 9060 3.20 1:20 - 2540 B RL=Reporting Level BDL = Below Detection Level Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. '165 Gracey Avenue / Meriden, CT 06451 (203) 634-373t (Fax) 630-1336 Certification C'F-PH0547 1 MA-CT035 Date Samples Received 07/17/2008 Client Name: Report Date: Docko, Inc. 10/07/2008 CTL Lab No.: 0708483 PO No: FtYC Analyst: CP RESULTS OF ANALYSIS Bulk Sediment. Heavy Metals Matrix Type: SEDIMENT SEDIMENT CTL Sample No.: 13667 13668 Field ID: Composite 1, 2 Composite 4 & 5 Date & 3 Tested Parameters RL Method # Arsenic, Total-rog/kg 08/14/2008 0.2 6.6 3.4 - - 7060A Cadmium, Total-rog/kg 08/14/2008 0.03 0.29 BDL - - 60106 Chromium, Total-rog/kg 108/14/2008 0.2 27.0 12.7 - 6010B Copper, Total-mg/kg 08/14/2608 0.2 35.7 14.1 - 6010B Lead, Total-mg/kg 08114/2608 0.2 34.8 12.7 - - 6010B M=/~,u~y, Total-rog/kg 08/14/2008 0.01 0.24 0.09 - - 7471A Nickel, Total-mg/kg 08114/2608 0.2 17.6 8.1 - - 6010B Zinc, Totel-mg/kg 08/14/2008 0.4 75.2 28.7 - -- 6010B RL=Reporting Level BDL = Below Detection Level Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. 165Gracey Avenue I Meriden, CT 06451 (203) 634-3731 (Fax) 630-t336 Certification CT-PH0547 / MA-CT035 Date Samples Received 07/17/2008 Client Name: Docko, Inc. CTL Lab No.: 0708483 PO No: FIYC Report Date: 10/07/2008 Analyst: KM ' RESULTS OF ANALYSIS Bulk Sediment - PAH's by 8270C Matrix Type: CTL Sample No.: Field ID: Date Analyzed: Date Extracted: SEDIMENT SEDIMENT 13667 13668 Composite I, 2 & Composite 4 & 5 3 08/02/2008 08/02/2008 07/31/2008 07/31/2008 Pammetera Units RL Naphthalene pg~g 4 6.0 BDL - - Acenaphthylene pg/~g 6 6.0 BDL - - Acenaphthene pg/kg 6 BDL BDL - - Fluorene pg/kg 4 5.0 BDL - - Phenanthrene pg/kg 7 33.0 14.0 - - Anthracene pg/tcg 4 10.0 5.0 - - Fluoranthene pg/kg 6 79.0 35.0 -- -- Pyrene pglkg 8 79.0 37.0 -- -- Benzo(a)anthracene pg/kg 4 31.0 16.0 -- -- Chrysene pg/kg 5 ' 42.0 23.0 -- -- Benzo(b)fluoranthene pg/kg 7 55.0 31.0 -- -- Benzo(k)fluomnthene pglkg 7 23.0 13.0 -- -- Benzo(a)pyrene pglkg 4 40.0 23.0 -- -- Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pymne pg/kg 6 26.0 17.0 -- -- Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene pg/kg 8 11.0 BDL - - Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene pg/kg 8 33.0 21.0 -- -- 2-Fluorobiphenyl % -- 97 102 - - Nitrobenzene-d5 % -- 100 101 - RL=Reporting Level BDL = Below Detection Level Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. '165 Gracey Avenue / Meriden, CT 06451 (203) 634-3731 (Fax) 630-t336 Certification CT-PH0547 1 MA-CT035 Date Samples Received 07/17/2008 Client Name: Docko, Inc. Report Date: 10/07/2008 CTL Lab No.: 0708483 PO No: FIYC Analyst: LJ RESULTS OF ANALYSIS Bulk Sediment - Pesticides by EPA 8081B Nlalzlx Type: CTL Sample No.: Field ID: Date Analyzed: Date Extracted: SEDIMENT SEDIMENT 13667 13668 Composite 1, 2 & Composite 4 & 5 3 08/07/2008 08/07/2008 07/31/2008 07/31/2008 Pammetem Units RL Alddn pgikg 0.6 BDL 8DL - - 3s-Chlordane pg/kg 0.7 BDL BDL - ~zans-Chlordane pg/kg 0.7 BDL BDL - :is-Nonachlor pg/kg 0.7 BDL BDL - ~rans-Nonachlor pg/kg 0.7 BDL BDL - - ~)xychlordane pg/kg 0.7 BDL SDL - - 4,4'-DDT pgAg 0.7 BDL BDL - - ¢,4'-DDE ~g/kg 0.7 1.9 BDL - - ~I,4'-DDD pg/kg 0.7 5.1 1.4 -- -- Dielddn pg/kg 0.7 BDL BDL - - ~lpha-Endosulfan pg/kg 0.7 BDL BDL - - 3ete-Endosuifan pglkg 0.7 BDL BDL - - Endrin pg/kg 0.6 BDL BDL - - Heptachlor pg/kg 0.7 BDL BDL - - Heptachlor Epoxide pg/kg 0.7 BDL BDL - - -lexachlorobenzene pg/kg 0.7 BDL BDL - - ILindane i~g/kg 0.6 BDL BDL - - Me~hoxychlor pg/~g 0.7 BDL BDL - - Toxaphene pglkg 20 BDL BDL - - PCBs, Total Hg/kg 0.7 22.6 10.8 -- -- 2,4'-DDD-SR % -- 118 129 - - RL=Reporting Level BDL = Below Detection Level Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. 165Gracey Avenue/ Meriden, CT 064.61 (203) 634-3731 (Fax) 630-1336 Certification CT-PH0547 1 MA-CT035 Date Samples Received 07/17/2008 Client Name: Doc, ko, Inc. CTL Lab No.: 0708483 PO No: FIYC Report Date: 10/07/2008 Analyst: LJ RESULTS OF ANALYSIS Matrix Type: CTL Sample No.: · Field ID: Bulk Sediment - Congeners by EPA 8082A SEDIMENT SEDIMENT 13667 13668 Composite 1, 2 & Composite 4 & 5 3 Date Analyzed: 08/07/2008 08/07/2008 Date Extracted: 07/31/2008 07/31/2008 Parametem Units RL diCB #8 pg/kg 0.8 BDL BDL - - biCB #18 pg/~g 0.8 BDL BDL - - triCB #28 pg~kg 0.8 2.3 1.5 -- -- ~etraCB .'?. ~ pglkg 0,8 BDL BDL - - tetraCB+ fl49 pg/kg 0.8 BDL BDL - - tetraCB #52 pg/kg 0.9 BDL BDL - - tetraCB #66 pg/kg 0.8 2.7 1.6 -- -- )entaCB+ #87 pg/kg 0.8 2.1 0.9 - -- )entaCB #101 pg/kg 0.8 1.6 1.1 -- -- )entaCB #105 pg/kg 0.8 BDL BDL - - )entaCB #118 pg/kg 0.8 1.7 BDL - - )entaCB #128 pg/kg 0.8 BDL BDL - - hexaCB #138 pg/kg 0.9 1.8 1.2 - - hexaCB #153 pg/kg 0.8 1.2 BDL - - heptaCB #170 pg/kg 0.8 BDL BDL - - heptaCB #180 pg/kg 0.8 BDL BDL - - heptaCB+ #183 pg/kg 0.8 BDL BDL - - heptaCB+ #184 pg/kg 0.8 BDL BDL - - heptaCB #187 pg/kg 0.8 BDL BDL - - octaCB #195 Pg~g 0.8 BDL BDL - - nonaCB #206 pg/kg 0.8 BDL BDL - - dec~_C:R f/209 pg/kg 0.8 BDL BDL - - 2,4'-DDD-SR % -- 112 122 - - RL=Reporting Level BDL = Below Detection Level Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. 165 Gracey Avenue t Meriden, CT 06451 (203) 634-3731 (Fax) 630-~1336 Certification CT-PH0547 1 MA-CT035 Date Samples Received 07117/2008 Client Name: Docko, Inc. Report Date: 10/07/2008 CTL Lab No.: 0708483 PO No: FIYC Analyst: SJF RESULTS OF ANALYSIS EPA 8260B BTEX Compounds Matrix Type: SEDIMENT S~DIMENT CTL Sample No.: 13667 13668 . Field ID: Composite 1, 2 & Composite 4 & 5 3 Date Analyzed: 09/17/2008 09/17/2008 Date Extracted: 09/17/2008 09/1712008 Parameters Units RL Benzene ug/Kg 10 BDL BDL - - Toluene ug/Kg . 10 BDL BDL - - Ethyl Benzene ug/Kg 10 BDL BDL _ _ I ph'n-Xylene ug/Kg 10 BDL BDL - - o-Xylene ug/Kg 10 BDL BDL - - 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/Kg 10 BDL BDL - - 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/Kg 10 BDL BDL - - 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/Kg 10 BDL BDL - MTBE ug/Kg 10 BDL BDL - 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 % -- 133 131 - - Toluene-d8 % -- 102 105 - - 4-Bromofluorobenzene % -- 110 115 - - RL=Reporting Level BDL = Below Detection Level Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. 165 Gracey Avenue/ Meriden, CT 06451 (203) 634-3731 (Fax) 630-1336 Cer[ification CT-PH05471 MA-CT035 Date Samples Received 07/17/2008 Client Name: Docko, Inc. CTL Lab No.: 0708483 PO No: FIYC Report Date: 10/07/2008 Analyst: SJF RESULTS OF ANALYSIS Bulk Sediment Mirex MatrixType: SEDIMENT SEDIMENT CTL Sample No.: 13667 13668 Field ID: Composite 1, 2 & Composite 4 & 5 3 Date Analyzed: 09/30/2008 09/30/2008 Date Extracted: 0713112008 07/31/2008 Parametem Units RL Mirex pg/kg 10 BDL BDL - - 2-Fluorobiphenyl % -- 114 107 - - Nitmbenzene-d5 % -- 95 92 - - p-Teq~enyl-d14 % -- 73 77 - - RL=Reporfing Level BD!~ = Below Detection Level Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc, t65 Gracey Avenue/ Meriden, CT 06451 (203) 634-3731 (Fax) 630-1336 Certification CT-PH0547 1 MA-CT035 Date Samples Received 07/17/2008 Client Name: Docko, Inc. Report Date: 10/07/2008 CTL Lab No.: 0708483 PO No: FIYC Analyst: SJF RESULTS OF ANALYSIS EPA 8081 Chlordane. RCP Mab';x Type: CTL Sample No.: Field ID: Date Analyzed: Date Extracted: Parameters Chlordane ~'etmchloro-m-Xylene-SR ! DecachlorobiphenykSR Unite RL ug/Kg 1.7 SEDIMENT SEDIMENT 13667 13668 Composite 1, 2 & Composite 4 & 5 3 08/07/2008 08/07/2008 07/3112008 07/31/2008 BDL BDL 103 122 118 129 RL=Reporting Level BDL = Below Detection Level Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. 165 Gracey Avenue / Meriden, CT 06451 (203) 634-373'1 (Fax) 630-1336 Certification CT-PH0547 1 MA-CT035 Date Samples Received 07/17/2008 I lient Name: Docko, Inc. CTL Lab No.: 0708483 eport Date: 10/07/2008 Analyst:PO No: spFIYC RESULTS OF ANALYSIS Matrix Type: SEDIMENT SEDlMENT CTL Sample No.: ~i3667 13668 Field ID; Composite 1, 2 Composite 4 & 5 Date & 3 Tested pammetem RL ISilver, Total-mg/kg 108/14/20081 0.2 I BDL I BDL I - I - Method~# I 6010B RL=Reporting Level BDL = Below Detection Level Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. 165 GraceyAvenuel Meriden, CT 06451 (203) 634-3731 (Fax) 630-t336 Certification CT'-PH0547 / MA-CT035 Date Samples Received 07/17/2008 IClient Name: Doc, ko, Inc. Report Date: 10/07/2008 CTL Lab No.: 0708483 PO No: FIYC Analyst: SO RESULTS OF ANALYSIS Bulk Sediment - EPA 1613B Dioxin/Furans Matrix Type: SEDIMENT SEDIMENT CTL Sample No.: 13667 13668 ' Field ID: Composite 1, 2 Composite 4 & 5 Date & 3 Tested Parameters RL Method # 2,3,7,8-TCDD-pg/g 09/18/2008 0.61 BDL BDL - - EPA-5 1613B total TCDD-pg/g 09/18/2008 0.53 BDL BDL - ~- EPA-5 1613B ~ 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD-pg/g 09/18/2008 0.80 BDL BDL - - EPA-5 1613R :Total PeCDD-pg/g 09/18/20~ 1.3 BDL BDL - - EPA-5 1613R li2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD-pg/g o8/18/200~ 0.86 BDL BDL - - =PA-5 161Rn 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD-pg/g O8/18/20O8 1.1 BDL BDL - - EPA-5 161~n 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-pg/g 09/18r2008 1.0 BDL BDL - - =PA-5 1613B Total HxCDD-pg/g 09/18/2008 -- 29 16 - - EPA-5 1613B 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD-pg/g 09118/20O8 -- 52 28 - - EPA-5 1613B Total HpCDD-pg/g 09/18/2008 -- 150 74 - - EPA-5 1613E OCDD-pg/g 09/18/2008 -- 970 360 - - EPA-5 1613E 2,3,7,8-TCDF-pg/g ~ 09/18/2008 -- 3.6 2.3 - - EPA-5 1613E Total TCDF-pg/g 09/18/2008 -- 20 9.9 - - EPA-5 1613E 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF-pg/g 09/18/2008 0.69 BDL BDL - EPA-5 1613B 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF-pg/g 09/18/20O8 0.77 BDL BDL - - EPA-5 1613B Total PeCDF-pg/g 09/18/2008 -- 5.5 4.0 - - EPA-5 1613R 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF-pg/g 09/1812008 1.3 BDL BDL - - EPA-5 1613R 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF-pg/g 09/18/200~ 0.53 BDL BDL - --PA-5 161'~n 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF-pg/g 09118/20O8 0.63 BDL BDL - - --PA-5 1613B 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF-pg/g 09/18/2008 0.70 BDL BDL - =PA-5 1613B Total HxCDF-pg/g 99/18/2008 -- 6.3 4.2 - EPA-5 1613B 1,2,3,4,6,7.8-HpCDF-pg/g 09118/2008 -- 11 7.0 - EPA-5 1613B 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF-pg/g 09/18/2008 0.42 BDL BDL - EPA-5 1613E Total HpCDF-pg/g 09/18/2008 -- 11 12 - EPA-5 1613E OCDF-pg/g 09/18/2008 -- BDL 9.8 - EPA-5 1613E l:~-~Rep or ting Level BDL = Below Detection Level Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. 165 Gracey Avenue / Meriden, CT 06451 (203) 634-373'1 (Fax) 630-t336 Certification CT-PH0547 / MA-CT035 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT 8260B Volatile Organics - GC/MS Oraer~: BLANK z S~mp~ spi~ c~T~, ---~ (-'/o~--~ mo ~o~ifl~r~u~ ~17705-02 BDL ~l~m~g ~17705~2 BDL V~I chlo~d~ ~ 17705-02 BDL C~-u~8 0017705~2 BDL B~o~ ~ 17705-02 BDL Th~lomfluom~u~ 0017705-02 BDL 1,1 -Die~o~yl~g 0017705-02 BDL M~yl~ ~l~d~ ~17705-02 BDL ~l,2-~lo~l~g ~17705~2 BDL 1 ,I -Di~o~g 001~05-02 BDL 2~-D~B~S ~17705-02 BDL ~ 1 ~-~1 ~u~g ~ 17705 -02 BDL ~omf~g 0017705~2 BDL Bm~omm~u~g 0017705-02 BDL 1,1,1-Th~o~u~g 0017705-02 BDL 1,1 -Dichlo~l~u~g ~ 17705 -02 BDL C~ ~a~S ~ 17705 -02 BDL m~ ~17705~2 BDL l~-Di~lo~u~g ~17705-02 BDL Td~lo~yl~u~g ~17705-02 BDL l ~-Dic~o~-u~ ~] 7705-02 BDL Bmm~ichlomm~-u~g 0017705-02 BDL ~omm~u~ 0017705-02 BDL c~l ,~c~ompm~l~-~g ~ 17705-02 BDL Tol~n~g ~17705~2 BDL ~ I,~chlom~u~g ~ 17705~2 BDL 1,1 ~-T~l~u~g ~ 17705-02 BDL T*~ylm~ ~17705-02 BDL l ~-Di~om~g 0017705~2 BDL Di~om~u~g 0017705-02 BDL 1 ~-Di~e-u~ 0017705-02 BDL Chl~u~ 0017705-02 BDL Emyl B~g 0017705-02 BDL l,1,1 ~-T~c~g 0017705-02 BDL ~Xy~g 0017705-02 BDL ~Xylm~g 0017705 -02 BDL S~g ~17705-02 BDL Bmmofo~-u~g 0017705-02 BDL Im~yl~-u~g 0017705-02 BDL 1,1 ~-Te~or~e-u~g 00] 7705-02 BDL Connecticut Testing Laboratories, lnc 165 Grace}' Avenue, Merillen, CT 06451 Phone: (203) 634-3731 Fax: (203) 630-1336 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT 8260B Volatile Organics - GC/MS o~: o7osnsa BLANK ] Sample I Spike QC Test Pet (%} RPI) Bromobenzene-ug/Kg 0017705-02 BDL I ~3-Tfichloropmpane-ug/Kg 0017705-02 BDL n-Propylbenzene-ug/Kg 00] 7705-02 BDL 2-Ck~orotoluene-~ 0017705 -02 I~DL t ,3 ~-Trime~hylber~ene~ug/Kg 00] 7705-02 BDL 4~hlorotoluefle-ug/Kg 0017705-02 t3DL t~-B u~'lbemene-ug~.g DO 17705-02 BDL 1 ~2.4-Trimethylbenzene-ug/Kg DO ] 7705-02 BDL ~e~'13utylbunzene'us/Kg 00] 7705-02 BDL p-lsop,~pyltoluene-ug/Kg 0017705-02 BDL 1.3-Dichlo~o-ug/Kg 0017705-02 BDL 1,4-Dichloroberaene-ug~Kg DO 17705-02 BDL n-Butylbunzen~ug/Kg 0017705-02 BDL . 1,2-Dichlombenzen~ug/Kg 00 ] 7705 -02 BDL ! ~-D~3rom~a-chloropmpane-ugtl~ 0017705-02 BDL ! 2,n-Tfi chlombenzem-ug/Kg DO 17705-02 BDL H~achlorobutadiene-ug/Kg 00] 7705-02 BDL Naphthalcne-ug/Kg 00] 7705-02 BDL 1,2,3-Trichlorobunzene-ug/Kg DO17705-02 BDL Methyl ethyl ketone-ugJKg 0017705-02 BDL MIBK-ug/Kg 0017705-02 BDL Methyl butyl ketone-ug/Kg 00] 7705-02 BDL Methyl tert-bmyl ethe~ (MT~E)-ug/Kg DO 17705-02 BDL CONTROL ] LAB-ID # Sample Spi~ QC Tnt Pet (%) RPD ~hloromethane-ug/Kg 0017705-03 160 154 96.3% ~Moroe~ume-ug/Kg 0017705-03 160 182 I 13.8% iBromomethan~ug/g,g 0017705-03 160 163 10].9% Tr{chloro fl uoromethane-~g 0017705-03 160 t 36 85.% I, I -Dichloroethyl~ne-ug/Kg DO] 7705-03 160 142 88.8°/, I, 1 - Dichloroethane-ug/Kg 0017705-03 160 148 92.5% 2,2- Dichloropropane- ug/Kg 0017705-03 160 147 91.9% cia- 1,2- D~¢hlorocthylcne-ug/Kg 00] 7705-03 160 147 91.9% Ch] °r°f°rm'ug/K8 0017705-03 160 154 96.3% Bromochloromethane-ug/Kg 0017705-03 160 14! 88.1% Connecticut Testing Laboratories,/nc. 165 Gracey Avenue, Meri.den, CT 06451 Phone: (203) 634-3731 Fax: (203) 630-1336 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT 8260B Volatile Organics - GC/MS Ordern: 070S~S~ CONTROL ~ s.-p~ Spike QCTest 1 ,I -Di~o~l~-u~g 0017705-03 1~ 1~ ~.% C~n ~o~d~ ~17705-03 1~ 131 81.~A ~'~g ~17705-03 ~ ~4a 12-~o~u~s 0017705-03 1~ 152 /dchlo~l~u~g ' ~17705-03 160 151 ~.4% I~-Dichlompm~-u~g 0017705-03 I~ 150 93.8% Bmm~lomm~e-u~g ~17705-03 1~ 148 ~.5% rol~g ~17705.03 I~ 152 ~ l,~lom~y~g ~ 17705~3 I~ 157 I,l~-T~l~u~ ~17705~3 ~ 153 95.6% r~yl~u~g 0017705-03 I~ 191 119.4% I~-~chlom~u~g 0017705~3 160 I~ ~Dibrom~loro~u~g ~17705-03 1~ 145 ~.6% 1 ~-Di~m~u~g ~] 7705-03 160 141 88.1% Chl~n~u~g .~ 17705-03 I~ ~ 1 E~y[ B~g 0017705-03 160 157 98.1% l, 1, I ~-T~hlo~u~g 00 ] 7705 -03 1 ~ 157 98. ~-Xylen~g 0017705-03 32O 319 ~Xyl~g ~17705-03 ~ ~56 S~g 0017705~3 ~ 165 103.~% Bmmofo~u~g ~ 17705-03 1 ~ 147 91 ~Wopyl~e-u~g ~] 7705-03 160 152 B~o~ne-u~g ~17705~3 1~ 165 103.1 m~l~-u~ 0017705.03 1~ 155 ~.~ 2~tol~g 0017705-03 160 158 98.~A 1 ~ ,~Tdm~l~u~g 0017705-03 I ~ ] 65 103.1 ~Chl~tolum~u~g 0017705-03 160 1~ 102.5% ~-B~l~u~8 0017705~3 1~ I~ 103.8% I~.~Td~yl~g ~17705-03 I~ 159 ~.4% ~-B~l~u~g 0017705-03 I~ I~ ~.3% ~l~pm~l~l~e-u~g 0017705-03 I~ I~ 96.3% 1,3-Dic~om~ene-u~g ~ 17705-03 I ~ I~ I ,~Di~lo~ne-u~g 0017705-03 160 1 ~ 1 ~.% 1 ~-~chlom~ne-u~g 0017705- 03 ] 60 I ~ 103.8% Connectlcut Testing Laboratories, ln~ 165 Gracey Avenue, Meriden, CT 06451 Phone:(203)634-3731 Fax: ~203)630-1336 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT 8260B Volatile Organics - GC/MS O~d~r~: CONTROL; s,=~l, Spil~ QC Test Pet 1%) RPD SEDIMENT 12,4-Trichl°r°benzene-'ug/Kg 0017705-03 160 157 98. I% Hexachlombutadiene-ug/Kg 0017705 -03 160 159 99.4% Naphthalet~-ug/Kg 00] 7705-03 160 161 100.6% Methyl ethyl ke~on~-ug/Kg 00! 7705-03 t6o 152 95.% MIBK-ug/Kg 0017705-03 160 142 M~thyl butyl ketone-ug/Kg 0017705-03 160 153 95.6% Methyt tea-t-btayl ether ( MTB E )- u~/Kg 0017705-03 160 141 88. t% DUPLICATE I LAB-ID# $.mple Spike QC Te~t Dichl°r°dffi u°mmethnne' us/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% 7hlorometlmae-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% Vinyl chloride-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% 21"lnmethnne'uFJKg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% · -oraom~thane-u~8 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0. rrichlorofluommethane-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% Methylene chloride-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% trans-1,2-Diehloroet hylen~-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% I,~ -Dichlomethane-uga~g 0000136.67 BDL BDL 0.% eis-l,2-Dichloroethylene-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL ' 0.% Chloroform-ug/Kg 0000] 36-67 BDL BDL 0.% Brom~htommethane-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% 1.1 ,I -Triehloroethane-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% 1,1 -Dichlorolm)pylene-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% Carbon tetrac~l~de-ugaCg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% Beraene-u~ 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% 1,2-Dieblomeahane-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% Tfiehloreettfflene-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0. 1,2-Dichlomlm~pane-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% Bromodichlotomethane-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% l'oluene-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% I,I 2-Trichloroethane-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% Temachloroethylene.ug/K g 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% 1,3 - Dichlompropane-ug/Kg 0000] 36.67 BDL BDL 0.% D~romochloromethane- ug/K g 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. 165 Graeey Avenue, Meri_den, CT 06451 Phone: (203) 634-3731 Fax: (203) 630-1336 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUAL/TY CONTROL REPORT 8260B Volatile Organics - GC/MS Order: 070S4~ ~ Sample Spike QC Test Pet (%) RPD DUPLICATE ] SEDIMENT , Concentr. Concentr. : Result Recove~ 1,2-Dib, 6,aoeflmne-ug/K8 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% ~loroba~-ne-ug~g 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% ~thyi mno.~m~-u~ 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% I,I ,I ,2-Totra¢~doro~ha~-~ 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0. ~m-Xytene-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% ]o-xyi~ne-u~Zg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% Svfnme-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% Btomoform-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% l~°w°pylbe~zene'ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% i ,i ,2 ,2-Tetr~hlor~than~-ugr~ 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% ~to~nobenz~e-uSm4 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% 1.2~-T~chlompmpane-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0. % n-Propylbem~n~ug~Kg 0000! 36-67 BDL BDL 0.% 2-Chlorololu~e-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% 1,3.5-Trimethylbenzene-ug/I~ 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% 4-Chlomtoluen~-ug~g 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% t~t'BuWIbenzen~ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL ],2,4-T,m~hVlbe~z~-a~n~S 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% scc-Butylb~nzene-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% ~-[sopropyltoluen~ u~/K~ 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% 1,3-Diehlorobenzene-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 1,4-Dichlombenzene-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% n-Butylbenzene-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% 12-Oichlorob~n~n~ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% L2-Dibromo-3~hloropropane-ug/Kg 0000] 36-67 BDL BDL 0.% 1,2,4-T~chlombenzene-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% Hcxachla~obu~dic~-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% ~aphthalem-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% 1,2,3-Trichlotobenzcne-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% Methyl ethyl kenon~ug~8 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% ~BK-uga~ 0000136-67 BDL BDL Methyl butyl ketonc-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% Methyl tm-butyl ether (M'I'BE)-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% Sample Spike QC T~t Pet (%) I RPD MS [ LAB-ID # Coacentr. Concealr. Reznlt Recovery SEDIMENT I Dich] °r°difl u°r°mc~a~e'ug/K8 0000136-67 BDL 160 148 92.5% Chlommcthane-ug/l~g 0000136-67 BDL 160 129 80.6% Vinyl chloride-ug/Ks 0000136-67 BDL 160 146 91.3% Ch~oro~ha~-u~n~ 0000136-67 BDL 160 183 ] 14.4% Btomomethane-u~Kg 0000136-67 BDL ! 60 133 83.1% Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT 8260B Volatile Organics - GC/MS Or er : 070S4 I LAB-ID # Sample Spike QC Test P¢I (%) ] RPD I, 1 -Dichloroethyler~-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 130 81.3% Me~ylene chlorid~-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 139 ~6.9% trans-I ~-Dichloro~-hhyl~ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 ] 12 70.% 2~2-Dichlompropane-ug/K g 0000136-67 BDL 160 133 83.1% ¢is-12-Dic~on~hylene-u~Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 I 13 70.6% Bttmmchloromelhan~ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 113 70.6% 1.1.1 -Trichlorocdmm~ug/I~ 0000136-67 BDL 160 122 76.3% l,l -Dicbloropropyle~e-u~Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 112 70.% ~arbon l~wachloride-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 I 15 71.9% ~nz~n~-u~/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 119 74.4% I ~2-Dichlomethane-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 126 78.8% Frichloro~hyl~ne-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 115 71.9% 12-Dich/oropropane-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 114 71.3% ~romodi~oromethaa~uLt/Kg 000013 6-67 BDL 160 123 76.9% IDibromom~han~-ugnCg 0000136-67 BDL 160 127 79.4% els- 1,3-Dicld oropropyleno-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 96.0 60.% Toluene-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 116 72.5% 1,1.2-Trichloroehhane-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 I 10 68.g% 13 -Diehl oropropane-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 101 63.1% 12-Dibromoethane-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 94.0 58.8% Chlo, ob~en~ugn~ 0000136-67 BDL 160 98.0 61.3% E~hyl ne~-ugn~ 0000136-67 BDL 160 ]40 87.5~/o 1, l, l ~2-Te~aeMoroelhane-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 114 71.3% phn-Xylen~ug/Kg 0000] 36-67 BDL 320 273 85.3% ~-Xylen~ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 124 77.5% ~t-~n~-u~g 0000136-67 BDL 160 7l .0 4~.4% ~romoform-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 74 0 46.3% 1.1 ~,2-TcUachloroc'qhane-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 101 63 1% 123-TrichJa, opfu~-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 104 65.% 1,3 ~-Tn methylhenzen~ ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 154 96.3% Connecvicut Testing Laboratories. Inc. 165 Graeey Avenue, Meriden, CT 06451 Phone: (203) 634-3731 Faxl (2~3i 630-1336 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT 8260B Volatile Organics - GC/MS OrderS: 070S~a~ ~'S · Sample Spike QC Test Pet (%) ~ RPD LAB-II) ~ ~Chl~tol~u~ 0~0136-67 BDL l~ ~35 ~.4% ~-~1~ 0~013~7 BDL I~ 149 93.1% 1 ~,~Tfim~l~u~g 0~013~67 B~ 1~ 128 ~-B~t~g ~013~67 BDL 1~ ] 12 70.% 1,3-~om~g 0~ 13 ~67 BDL ] ~ ~.0 59.4% I ,~c~o~u~g 0~ 13~67 BDL ] ~ 126 78.~A ~-B~I~g ~0136~7 BDL I~ 117 73.1% ' I~-D~om~u~ ~136~7 BDL 1~ ~.0 58.8% I ~-Dib~c~m~ ~13~7 BDL 1~ ~.0 48.~A t~,*T~om~ 0~13~67 BDL I~ ~.0 35.% ~i~u~ ~013~67 BDL I~ ~.0 15.% N~g ~0136~7 BDL 1~ ~.0 32.5% I~T~om~ ~13~7 BDL 1~ 45.0 28.1% M~I ~1 k~o~u~g 0~136-67 BDL I~ ~.0 53.~ M~I bu~l k~u~g ~ 13~7 BDL I ~ I ~ 68.1% ~1 t~-b~l ~ ~E~u~ 0~ ] 3~67 BDL I ~ l ~ 4 71.3% D~ifl~u~g ~13~67 BDL ]~ 105 65.6% C~omm~ 0000136-67 BDL 1~ 69.0 43.1% ~.6% V~yl ehl~de-~g 0~13~7 BDL 1~ 1~ 91.3% Chlo~g 0000136-67 BDL ] ~ 1 g l I I 3.1% I. 1% I ,I-~lo~yl~u~g 000013~7 BDL l~ I~ ~.% 10~% M~I~ ~d~ 0~13~67 BDL 1~ 133 83.1% 4.4% ~-1,2-~l~l~u~g ~13~7 BDL 160 133 83.1% 17.1% 1,1 -DicMo~u~g 00~ 136-67 BDL I~ 127 79.4% 4.8% ~-~o~m~u~g 0~013~7 BDL I~ 1~ ~.% :i~l ~-~yl~u~g ~136-67 BDL I~ 129 ~.6% 13.2% Chlomfo~-u~g 00~136-67 BDL l~ t25 78.1% 7.5% ~ t~o~de-u~ ~013~67 BDL I~ 119 74.4% 3.4% ~u~g ~ 13~67 BDL I~ 132 82.~ I 0~% 1 ~-Dichlor~u~ 0~0] 3~67 BDL 1~ 126 78.8% 0.% T~chlor~.l~u~g 0000136-67 BDL I ~ 148 925% Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Ina 165 Graeey Avenue, Meriden, C~[ ~] Phone: (203) 634-375l Fax: (203) 630- t336 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT 8260B Volatile Organics - GCfMS OrderS: MSD ! Sample Spike QC Te~t Pet (%) RPO 1 ~2-Dichloropmpane~ug/K8 0000136-67 BDL 160 124 77.5% 8.4% Bmmodichlomm~thane-ug/Kg 0000 ! 36-67 BDL 160 117 73.1% 5.% Dibrornomethane-ug/gg 0000136-67 BDL 160 122 76.3% 4% Toluene-ug]K8 0000136-67 BDL 160 131 81.9% 12.1% trar~- 1,3-Diehloropmpylene-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 109 68.1% 4.5% 1,1,2-Trichloroethane-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 116 72.5% 5.3% Tem~hloroethylene-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 135 84.4% 432% 13-Dicblompropane-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 109 68.1% 7.6% D~3romochlommethan~u~]K~ 0000136-67 BDL 160 98.0 61.3% 6.3% 12-D~'~m~-u~q~ 0000136-67 BDL 160 87.0 54.4% 7.7% Chlorobera~ne-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL I~0 125 78.1% 24~A Ethyl Benzone-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 131 81.9% 6.6% I,l .I ~2-Teuachloroethane-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 I 12 70.% 1.8% phr~Xyle~e-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 320 269 84.1% 1.5% o-Xyl~ne-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 120 75.% 3.3% S~'ene-ugn~ 0000136-67 BDL 160 86.0 53.8% 193% Bmmofmm-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 80.0 50.% 7.8% laopmpylb~nzene-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 131 81.9% 12.2% 1, t ~-TeUachloroethane-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 108 67.5% 6.7% nromobenzen~uS~ 0000136-67 BDL 160 169 105.6% 0.% 1.2,3-Trichlompropar~-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 104 65.% 0.% n-Propylbenzene-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 132 82.5% 0.8% 2-Chlomtolmme-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 123 76.9% 2.4% 13,5-Tdmethylb~mz~ne-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 131 81.9% 16.1% 4-Chlmotolu~ne-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 128 80.% 5.3% t er t-Bulylbenzene-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 137 85.6% 8.4% 1,2,4-Trira~thyll~nz~m~-ug~g 0000136-67 BDL 160 I 18 73.8% g. 1% sec-Bury lbeazene-ug/Kg 0000] 36-67 BDL 160 125 78. I% I I .% p-lsopropyltoluene- ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 116 72.5% 6.7% a-But~lbenzene-ugIKg 0000136-67 BDL 160 117 73.1% 0.% I ~.,4- Tfi chloro benzene-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 63.0 39.4% 11.8% Hcxachlorobu~ iene- u g/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 104 65.% 125.% Connecticut Testing Laboratories. Inc 165 Grace) Avenue, Meri_den, CT 06451 Phone: (203) 634-3731 Fax: (203) 630-1336 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT 8260B volatile Organics - GC/MS OrderS: 070S4S~ MSD s~' Methyl butyl ketone- ut/Kg Methyl tert-butyl etl~r (MTBE)-ug/Kg Sml~ 0000136-67 [ OOO0136-67 0000136~67 : Type of QC :BLANK ;BLANK Ty~e of QC :CONTROL : Type of QC DUPLICATE :DUPLICATE : Type of QC iMS !MS ~MSD ~MSD Spik~ QC Test Congener. Result RPD BDL 160 119 74.4% 2.6% BDL 160 101 63.1% 7.6% 118 BDL Dibmmofluommethane Toluene-d8 160 % Reteveyed i Q~ Limits (%): 117% 70 . 130 : Recovered : QC Limits (%): [ % R~covered toluene-d8 105% Surroptes 3ibmmofluomme~ane foluene-d8 82% [ 70 ! 130 102% : 70[ 130 ]QC Limit~ (°/.) i 70 130 ; ! 70 130 · /. R,~,~,d i~C 81% i 7O 1~0 : 1~5% 70 '130 1 % Ret. overed ! QC Limits (%) 86% 70 130 105% 70 130 roluefle~8 3.4% Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. 165 Grace), Avenue, Meri.den, CT 06451 Phone: (203) 634-3731 Fax: (203) 630-1336 ConnecticUt Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Bulk Sediment - Congeners by EPA 8082A orders: 0708483 Sample Spike O~ Test Pot (%) RPD BI.4NK ~A~IO # Colzcentr. Coaeentr. Result Recovery SEDIMENT diCB #a-p~/kg 0017151-02 BDL ~CB ul~g 0017151-02 BDL ~B u2~g O017151-02 te~B+ g49-p~g 0017151-02 BDL re.CB ~52-p~g 0017151-02 BDL ~CB g~p~g 0017151-02 BDL mnmCB+ ~87-p~g ~ 17151-02 BDL ~nmCB gl01-p~g ~ 17151-02 BDL ~B gl I gp~g 0017151-02 BDL ~B g 12~p~g 0017151-02 BDL ~B g 153-p~g 0017151-02 BDL ~pmCB U I~p~g 0017151-02 nDL hepmCB+ ~1 a3-p~g ~ 17151-02 BDL ~CB+ g I ~-p~g 0017 ] 51-02 BDL ~pmCB g 187-~g 0017151-02 BDL ~B g 195-p~g ~ 17151-02 BDL ~ ~2~p~g 0017151-02 BDL d~aCB g2~-p~g 0017 ] 51-02 BDL ~iCB ~8-p~g 0017151-03 20.0 20.8 xiCB ~18-p~g ~ 17151-03 20.0 21.7 108.5% xiCB g2~p~g 00 ] 715 ] -03 20.0 20.4 102. :~B ~-~8 ~ 17151-03 20.0 21.0 105% ~n+ g49-p~8 ~ 17 ] 51-03 20.0 196 98.% t~B ~52-,~g 0017151-03 2OO 19.8 le~CB ~p~g 0017151-03 20.0 19.8 mnlaCB+ g87-p~g 0017151-03 20.0 19.4 ~nIaCB ~101-p~g 0017151-03 20 0 20.8 ~n~Cn ~t0S-~g 0017151-03 200 2~ 3 mn~CB gl 18-p~g 0017151~3 2OO 2O3 entaCB g 128-p~g 0017151-03 200 19.5 Mx~B ~ 138-~g 0017151-03 2O.O 19.7 985% hex~B g 153-g~g 0017151-03 20 0 19.8 hep~B g 17~p~g 00 [ 7 ] 51-03 20.0 20.9 1045% ~ptaCB ~ 18~ p~g 0017151-03 20 0 20 7 I Connectic~a Testing Laboratories. Inc. 165 Grace)' Avenue, Meri.den, CT 06451 Phone: {203) 634-373l Fax: (203) 630-1336 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Bulk Sediment - Congeners by EPA 8082A Or~erO: OTOSO,~ CONTROL~ ~ ~s-m# s.=~ svi~ ocx~t r~t(%) ~p~B+ ~ I 8~g~g O017151-03 20.0 2 L 6 108.% ~mCB g2~g~g 00 ] 7151-03 20.0 ~.0 110.% t~B g2~.p~g 0017151-03 20.0 2L~ ~05.5% 'rDUPLICATE ~wmo ~e S~~ ~T~t Pot (%) I tiCB ~S 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% mCB~I~ 0~13~7 BDL BDL ~CB ~2ga~S 0~13~67 Z3 2.0 14% ~CB ~a~g ~ 13~67 BDL BDL 0.% ~+ ~g 0~ 136-67 BDL BDL 0.% ~B ~52-~g 000013~7 BDL BDL 0.% ~B ~g 0~0136-67 2.7 2.5 7.~A ~m ~87-u~g 0000136-67 2.1 2.3 ~B n m~-u~g 000013~67 1.6 1.5 6.5% ~B ~10~g~ 0000136~7 BDL BDL 0.% · ~CB g 128-g~ 0000136-67 BDL BDL ~CB glS~g~g 0000136-67 1.2 1.1 8.7% ~mCB ~ ~ 7~g 0~013~67 BDL BDL 0.% h~B g ~ 8~g~g 0~0136-67 BDL BDL 0.% ~ ~183-~ 000013~67 BDL BDL ~p~B+ g I ~-g~g 0~013~7 BDL BDL 0.% ~p~B ~187-g~g 000013~67 ~L BDL 0.% ~B ~1 ~g 00~ 13~7 BDL BDL 0.% ~mCB g2~g~g ~0t 36-67 BDL BDL 0.% i~B g2~g~g 0~0136-67 BDL BDL 0.% MS ~ID g Sarape Spike ~ T~t Pet (%} I diCB g~g~g 000013~7 BDL 20.0 ~.9 119.5% lmCB n~go~g 000013~67 BDL 20.0 23.3 116.5% ~CB n2~n~g 0000136-67 2.3 20.0 24.4 110.5% m~B ~g 000013~67 BDL 20.0 ~.7 128.5% te~CB+ ~9-g~g ~0136-67 BDL 20.0 27.3 136.5% temCB n52-~g 000013~7 BDL 20.0 23.5 117.5% ~CB ~g 0000136-67 2.7 20.0 ~.8 120.5% ~n~B+ ~8%g~ 000013~67 2 ~ 20.0 24.4 I I 1.5% Connecticut Testing Laboratories. Inc. 165 Gracey Avenue, Meriden, CT 06451 Phone: (203) 634-3731 Fax: (203) 630-1336 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Bulk Sediment - Congeners by EPA 8082A o aer : MS [ Sampl~ Spike QC Test I Pct (%) ~ RPD ~B ~10~-~ 0~0136-67 1.6 20.0 ~.3 I 18.5% ~B gl~p~ ~136-67 BDL 20.0 ~.7 113.5% ~BaH~.~ ~136-67 1.7 2O.O 262 ~n~B gl2~g~g ~13&67 BDL 20.0 21.5 107.5% h~B al3gp~g ~136-67 1.8 20.0 ~.0 101.% hex~B g 153-g~g 0000136-67 t .2 20.0 21.7 102.5% ~ a]~g 00~136-67 BDL 20.0 2~.7 ~08.~% :~B gl~g~g 00~136-67 BDL ~.0 21.6 108.% ~ gl 83-g~g 0~136-67 BDL 20.0 24.4 ~B+gl~g~g 0~13&67 BDL 20.0 21.3 1~.5% ~ a~-~ 0~ 136-67 BDL ~.0 20.~ ]~B gl9~g~g ~0136-67 BDL 20.0 20.4 I 0Z% ~mCB g2~p~g ~0] 3&67 BDL 20.0 ~.7 113.5% d~B g~g~g 0~013~67 BDL 20.0 ~. 1 1~.5% Sample Spi~ ~ T~t Pet (%) MSD SED{~T ' diCB ~g 0000136-67 BDL 20.0 24.9 124.5% 4.1~ m~ g i $~g 00~ 136-67 BDL 20.0 ~.9 119.5% 2 mCB ~2~g 00~136-67 2.3 2O.0 25.3 115.% 3.6% ~cB ~g 0~0136-67 BDL 20.0 26.5 132.5% 3.1% ~B+ ~g~g ~0136-67 BDL 20.0 26.2 131.% 4.1% re.CB g52-g~g 000013&67 BDL 20.0 24.4 1~.% 3.~ ~B ~g ~0l 3~67 2 7 20.0 27.4 123.~/, 2.2% ~nmCB+ ~87-g~g ~00136-67 2. I 20.0 23.2 105.5% 5.% ~B gl 01-g~g ~00136-67 16 200 26.3 1~.5% ~mCB g 10~g~ 0~0136-67 BDL 20.0 23.3 116.5% 2.6% ~B gl 18-g~g 00~136-67 1.7 20.0 26.2 122.5% 0.% ~B ~12~p~ 0000] 36~7 BDL 20.0 21.8 109.% 1.4% ~B ~ ~ 3~g 00~ 136-67 { 8 20 0 22.3 102.5% 1.4% ~ ~5~g ~0136-67 1.2 20.0 21.9 103.5% o.~A ~p~cB al ~g ~00136-67 BDL 20.0 21.7 108.5% 0.% ~p~B gl ~g~g 0~136-67 BDL 20.0 ~.2 1 { 1.% h~mCB+ ~ t 83-g~g 0000136-67 BDL 20.0 23 5 117.5% 3 ~pmCB+ ~1 ~g~g 0000136-67 BDL 20.0 20.0 1~.% 6.3% h~mCB gl 87-g~g ~136-67 BDL 20.0 20.4 102% 1.5% ~B ~ 19~g~g 0~0136-67 BDL 20.0 20.9 1~.5% no,CB g~g~g 00~136-67 BDL 20.0 ~.9 114.5% {~CB ~2~-g~g 0~ 136-67 BDL 20.0 20.2 I 01 .% 0.5% S~ ] Sample Spike ~ T~ Pc, (%) ~ ReD Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. 165 Gracev Avenue, Meriden, CT 06451 Phone: (203)634-3731 Fax: (203)630-t336 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Bulk Sediment - Congeners by EPA 8082A OrderS: 0708483 S/~f I LAB-ID # ~ample Spike QC Test Pot (%) J PPI) SEDIMENT t Concentr. Concentr. Result Retovery diCB #g-gg/k8 0017151-05 4O.O 41.3 103.3% thCB # 18-pg/k8 00 ] 7 ! 51-05 40.0 42.3 105.8% ~CB #28-pg/kg 0017151-05 4o.o 40.4 101.% ~CB ~4-~g~g 001715 ! -05 40.0 40.7 101.sA mraCa+ ~40-~g~g 0017151-05 40.0 35.8 89.5% tea~CB #52-~g/k8 0017151-05 40.0 38.4 ~6.% te~aCB #6~-pg/kg 0017151-05 40.0 392 98.% ~CB+ #87.ng/kg 0017151-05 40.0 35.6 89.% emaCB #101-pS/kg 0017151-05 4O.0 4O.7 101.8% en~aCB #105-~gn~g 0017151-05 4O.0 4O.9 ~023% enmCB #118-#g/kg 0017151-05 4O.0 39.9 99.8% entaCB #12~-pg/kg 0017151-05 4O.0 39.4 98.5% ~,aC B #138-~tg/kg 0017151-05 40.0 37.5 93.8% ~exaCB # 153-pg/kg 00] 7] 5 ! -05 40.0 39.1 97.8% ~eptnCB # ~ 70-#g/kg 0017151-05 40.0 42.1 105.3% ~pmCB # 180-ng&g 0017151-05 40.0 41.4 ! 03.5% ~tnCB+ # 183-~tg/kg 001715 ] -05 40.0 39.4 98.5% ~aCB+ # 1S4-ngJkg 0017151-05 4O.0 38.1 95.3% hep~CB #~87-n~ks 0017151-05 4O.0 38.9 9~.3% at,CB #195-~g/kg 0017151-05 40.0 4O.3 100.8% nonaCB #206-pg/kg 0017 ] 51-05 40.0 43.7 109.3% decaCB #2094tg/kg 0017151-05 4O.0 4 I. I 102.8% __.Type of QC_ ..... Surrogates % Recovered QC Limits (%) BLANK -~:4'-DI:)~-S~ .......... : 9~'--~ 130 _ T~.y~.~_of~ ......... Snrrogate~ % Recovered QC Limits (~/*) CONTROL :2,4'-DDD-SR 97% 60 ~F 140 Typeo#~ Snn'egntes I °'4Rec°vered iQC Limits(%) DUPLICATE I"-DDD-~R 114% 70 t 130 Type of QC Snr~stes % Recovered QC Limits (%) ME; 2.4'-DDD-SR ~15% 70 I 130 TypeofQC I Snrr~ales °ARecovered ;~C Limits("/.) MSD 2,4'-DDD~R 114% 70 I 130 Type of(K:: ~ Surrogates % Recovered QC Limits (%) SRM t2,4'-DDD-SR 102% 60 ~, 140 Connecticut Testing Laboratories,/nc 165 Grace}, Avenue, Meriden, CT 06451 Phone: (203) 634-3731 Fax: (203) 630-1336 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Bulk Sediment - EPA 8290 Dioxin/Furans Oraer~: Sample Spike QC Test Pet (%) [ RPD BL/~NK [ LAB-ID, Concelmtr. Coa~tntr. R~salt Rt~overy SEDIMENT ~,3,7,8-TCDD-pg/g 0017796-02 BDL Fotal TCDD-pg/g 0017796-02 BDL L23,7,g'PeCDI~Pg/g 00] 7796-02 BDL Total PeCDD-pg/g 00! 7796-02 BDL ~ ,23,4,?;g-HxCDD-pg/g 0017796-02 BDL 1,2,3,6,7,g-HxCDD-pg/g 0017796-02 BDL 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-pg/g 0017796.02 BDL Fotal HxCDD-pg/g 0017796-02 BDL 1,2,3,4,6,7,g-HpCDD-pg/$ 0017796.02 BDL rot~ Hpcoo-podg 0017796-02 BDL ~CDD-pg/s 0017796-02 BDL ~,7,&TCOF~P~/S 0017796-02 BDL row TCDF-pe/8 0017796-02 ~.3,7,g-P~CDF-pg/g 0017796-02 BDL ~3.4.7,S-PeCDF-pg/g 0017796.02 BDL total P~42DF-pedg 0017796-02 BDL [.2.3.4,7,8-HxCDF-p~Jg 0017796-02 BDL 1.23.6.7.8-HxCDF-~/g 0017796.02 BDL 23,4,6,?,8-~lxCDF-pedg 0017796-02 BDL 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF~pg/g 0017796-02 BDL Total HxCDF-pg/g 00t 7796-02 BDL 1,2,3,4,6,?,~-HpCDF-pgdg 0017796-02 BDL 1.2,3.4,7.8.9-HpCDF-pg/g 00] 7796-02 BDL Total H~2DF-peJg 0017796.02 BDL OCDF-pgJg 0017796-02 BDL CONTROL ! Sample Spike QC Test ret (%) t RP. 2,~,7,8- TCDD-pg/g 0017796.03 20.0 18.6 93.% L2,3,?.~PeCDD~p~/~ 00! 7796-03 loo Iol Io1.% 1 ~2,3,4.7,8-HxCDD-p~/g 0017796-03 lo0 15.0 1.23,6.7,&-HxCDD-pg/g 0017796-03 100 95.1 95.1¥. 1.2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD-pg/g 001779~*03 100 104 104.% 1 ~,3,4.6.7.~HpCDD-p~g 00~ 7796.03 ~00 ~05 105 % OCDl~g/g 0017796-03 2O0 21z~ 107 % ~3.7.8-TCDF*pg/~ 0017796.03 2o.o 2o.6 1,2,3.?.~PeCDF-pg/g 0017796.03 ~00 103 ~03.% 2,3.4.7,8-PcCDF-pg/g 0017796.03 ]o0 lo0 1o0.% 1,2,3,4,7.8-l-LxCDF-pg/g 0017796-03 loo 97.7 97.7% 1,2,3,6.7,8-HxCDF-pg/g 0017796-03 100 98.2 98.2/0 !2,3,4,6,7,8- HxCDF-pg/g 0017796-03 ~O0 98 6 95.6% Conneclicut Testing Laboratories, Inc. 165 Gracey Avenue, Meriden, CF 06451 Phone: (203) 634-3731 Fax: (203) 630-1336 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY coNTROL REPORT Bulk Sediment - EPA 8290 DioxinfFurans OrderS: 070S4~ CONTROL ~ s.=o~ s~ ~t Pet(%) L2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF-pg/g 0017796-03 1~ 10l 101.% ~&3,4,6,7,~H~DF-p~g ~17~03 1~ ~.1 ~.1% 12~3,7,8;¢H~DF-~g ~177~03 1~ 953 95.3% ~DF-~g ~ 1779~3 2~ ~ 103.% Connecticut Testing Laboratories, bra 165 Grace)' Avenue, Meriden, CT 06451 Phone: (203) 634-3731 Fax: (203) 630-1336 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Bulk Sediment - Heavy Metals Oraer~: 070S~ B~rK [ Sample Spike QC Te~t a, rseni~, T~-m~ ~ 1719~2 B~ ~ T~g ~ 171 ~02 BDL :~miu~ T~-m~ ~ ] 71 ~02 BDL 2o~, To~-m~g 001719~0~ ' BDL ~ To~-m~g ~l 719~02 BDL M~, To~-m~g 00171 ~02 BDL ~kek To~-m~g ~ 171 ~02 BDL E~c, To~-~g ~ 171 ~02 BDL ~ T~-m~g 00171 ~03 280 278 2~i~ T~-m~g ~ 171 ~3 182 I 88 1033% Co~,~-m~ ~171~3 132 143 10~3% ~ To~-m~ 00171 ~03 ~.2 Zin~ To~g 001719~03 346 329 95. I S~e Sp~ : ~ T~t Pet (%) ~D DUPLICATE ~mo co~. co.~. g~t ~o~ ~ic, To~-m~ 0~013647 6.6 6.2 6.2% C~mi~ To~-m~g 0~0136-67 0.2~ 0310 6.~ C~om~ To~-m~g 0~ 136-67 27.0 26~8 0.~ Cop~r, To~-m~g 0000~ 36-67 35.7 36.2 1.4% L~ To~-m~g ~0~ 36-67 ~.8 36.4 4.5% Me~, To~-~g 0000136-67 0.2~ 0.2~ 4~1 N~kel, Toml-m~g ~ 136-67 17.6 16.9 4.1% ~ ~ ~ Sample Spike ~ T~t Pct (%) ~D ~ig To~-m~g 0~013647 6~6 280 270 E~J~ To~-m~g 0000136-67 02~ ~ 82 170 93.2% L~, To~-m~g ~ 136-67 34.8 72.2 ~2 89.2% Me~, To~-m~g 0000 ] 36~67 0.2~ 8.48 9.68 I ginc, Toml-m~g 000013647 75.2 346 3~ 83.5% ~ ~ S~mple Spike I~nic- T°~'m~g ] 0000136-67 [ 6.6 280 Connecticut Testing Laboratories. lnc. 165 Graeey Avenue. Meriden, CT 06451 Phone: (203) 634-3731 Fax: (203)630-1336 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Bulk Sediment - Heavy Metals Order#: 0708483 iMSD LAB-ID # Sample Spike QC Test Pet (%) RPD ! SEDIMb3qT Concentr. Concentr. Result Recovery Cadmium. Total-mg/kg 0000136-67 0.290 182 185 101.5% 8.5% Chromium, Total-n~kg 0000136-67 27.0 142 174 103,5% 8.4% Copper, Tot~-mfJkg 0000136-67 35.7 132 177 107.% 6.4% L~ut, Total=mg&g 0000136-67 ~4.8 72.2 103 94.5% 3.8% Mercury, Tolal-mg/kg 0000136-67 0.240 8.48 9.98 114.9% 3.1% Nickel, Total-rog/kg 0000136-67 17.6 155 190 I I 1.2% 49'/. Zinc, Tolal-mg/kg 0000136-67 75.2 346 394 92.1% 7.9'/0 SRM Sample Spike ! QC Test Pet (%) RPD LAB-ID # SEDIME?4T Conceatr. Concentr. i Result Recovery Arsenic, Total-ms/kg 0017194-05 7.76 7.39 95.2'/0 Cadmium, Total-m fJk8 00 ] 7194-05 35.6 36.2 I 01.7% Chromium, Total-mg&g 00 i 7194-05 14.5 I $.8 109.% Copper, Total-ms/k§ 00! '/194-05 15.5 15.4 99.4% Lead, Totxd-mg/kg 0017194-05 14.1 15.5 109.9'/o Mercury, Total-mE/kg 0017 ! 94-05 0.820 0.830 101.2% Nickel, Total-mg&g 0017194-05 28.6 28.5 99.7% Einc, Total-mgm8 0017194-05 89.0 92.5 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. 165 Gracey Avenue, Merle!eh, CT 06451 Phone: (203) 634-3731 Fax: (203) 630-1336 COnnecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Bulk Sediment - PAH's by 8270C Orderg: 0708483 '~ SEDIM~ ~a~t~len~g 00170~-02 BDL ~ph~yl~p~g 00] 7044~2 BDL g~nap~h~g ~170~-02 BDL Fl~m~-p~g 00170~-02 BDL P~n~p~g 0017044-02 BDL Anlh~p~g 0017044-02 BDL Flu~p~g 0017~4-02 BDL ,~-p~g 0017~-02 ~DL ~a~n~p~8 00170~-02 BDL ~Chq~g 00170~02 BDL ~ho~P~g ~] 7~4-02 BDL ~a~g~g 0017044-02 BDL l~m~l~,~d~r~-p~S 0017044-02 BDL Di~a,h~n~p~g 00170~-02 BDL m~gi~e~-~g ~170~-02 BDL CONTROL Na~t~-p~g 00170~-03 ~ 597 Acemph~yl~g 00170~-03 ~ ~4 A~aph~ene-p~g ~ 17044-03 ~ 5% ~.3% Fluomn~p~g 0017~-03 ~ 598 ~nanthre~-~g 0017~4-03 ~ ~ 1 Anth~-p~g 0017044-03 ~ 595 ~.2% Flu~anlh~p~g 0017044-03 ~ ~3 ~ren~g~g 00170~3 ~ 583 ~.2% ~m~a~8 0017~4-03 ~ 577 %.2% C~s~a~ 0017~03 ~ 583 97.2% ~b~P~8 0017~-03 ~ 593 ~k)fl~m~-p~g 00170~-03 ~ ~ 101.% ~(a)pyrem*p~g 0017~-03 ~ 586 97.7% ~l,Z3~re~-p~g 0017~-03 ~ 585 97.5% :~UPLIC~T~ LA~IO a Sample Spike ~Tesi Na~thale~-p~g 0~0136-68 BDL BDL 0.% Fluorcn~p~g 0000136-68 BDL BDL Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Ink; 165 Gracey Avenue, Merit.len, CT 06451 Phone: (203) 634-3731 Fax: (203) 630-1336 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Bulk Sediment - PAWs by 8270C OrderS: 0708483 !DUPLICATE LAB-iV # Sample Spil~ QC T~st Pet (%} RPD ~ SEDIM~T Concentr. Concen~. Result Rccove~ P~mne-g~g 000013~68 14.0 I 3.0 7.4% An&~g~g 0000136-68 S.0 4.0 22.2% Fluoranth~-p~g ~ 136-68 35.0 300 ~5.4% ~-~g 0000136~8 37 0 33.0 I 1.4% ~a~lh~p~g ~00136-68 16.0 15.0 6.5% Ch~s~p~g 0000136-68 23.0 21.0 9.1% ~b~u~-~g 0000136-68 31.0 23.0 29.6% ~k)fl~th~-p~g 000013~68 13.0 I 1.0 16.~ ~a~re~g 0000136-68 23.o 18.0 24.4% tM~ I ~,3-cd)~m~g~ 0~0136-68 17.0 14.0 19.4% Di~h)An~g ~0013~8 BDL BDL 0.% ~(gh,i)P~lene-u~g ~00136-68 2L0 ~9.0 Sample Spi~e .~ ~ Tesl Pet (%) RPD JMS ~ID g Concentr. Conceal. R~lt Recove~ ' SEDIM~T qapht hal~-g~g ~136-68 BDL ~ ~3 1~.5% ~ph~yle~p~g ~00136-68 BDL ~ ~ 1~.7% ~n~hth~e-p~g 00~ 136-68 BDL ?l~p~g 0~0136-68 BDL ~ ~2 1 ~.3% ~re~-~g 0000136-68 14.0 ~ 612 ~.7% Ant~p~g 0000136-68 5.0 ~ ~ 99~A ~the~ ~g ~ 13~68 35.0 ~ 634 99.~A ~ 0000136-68 37.0 ~(a~m~p~g ~00136-68 16.0 ~ 611 ~.2% Ch~s~g~g 0~0136-68 23.0 ~ 625 I ~.3% ~nz~)fl~m~g~8 ~00136-68 31.0 ~ 630 ~.8% Benz~thcne-p~g ~136-68 t30 ~ 613 I~.% m~agyre~.~g 00~13~68 2t0 ~ 625 1~.3% ~,~)~re~a ~13~68 ~7.0 ~ 6~5 ~.~ D~n~h~g~g ~136-68 BDL ~ ~ 101.% ~h,i)P~le~-g~g 00~ 136-68 21.0 ~ 624 I ~. 5% Samp~ Spike ~ ~T~t Pet (%) RPD : Napht~le~g~g 00~136-68 BDL ~0 ~3 1005% 0.% A~yle~g~g 0000 i 36-68 BDL ~ ~5 1~.8% 0.2% A~ph~e-p~g ~00136-68 BDL ~ ~2 1~.3% 0.% Flooren~g~g 00~ 136-68 BDL ~ 594 ~.% 1.3% Phe~re~g 000013648 140 ~ 615 I ~.2% 0.5% An~-g~g ~00 ] 36-68 50 ~ ~ 99.2% 0.% Flu~nth~-pWkg ~ 136-68 35.0 ~ 636 I ~% 0.3% Py~e-p~g 0000136-68 37.0 ~ 634 ~ 5% 0.5% Connecllcut Testing Laboratories, Inc. 165 Gracey Avenue, Meri~den, CT 06451 Phone: (203) 634-3731 Fax: {203) 630-1336 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Bulk Sediment - PAH's by 8270C Order0:0708483 sample Spike QC Test Pet (%) RPD MSD LAB-ID # Concentr. Concentr. Result Recovery SEDIMENT Benzo(a)ant hracene- pS/kg 0000136-68 16.0 600 611 99.2% 0.% Cl~/-~,~e-#~jk~ 0000136-68 23.0 600 628 100.8% 0.5% Benze0))fluoranlhene-~edkg 0000136-68 31 0 60O 631 100.% 0.2% I~nzo0c)fluoranthenc.- pg/kg 0000136-68 13.0 600 610 99.$% 0.5% Benzo(a)pyrene-pg/kg 0000136-68 23.0 600 625 100.3% 0.% Ind~no(l,~,3-ot)Pyre~-p~kg 0000136-68 I?.0 6OO 6~3 99.3% 0.3% Diben~o(a,h)Anthracene- p g/kg 0000136-68 BDL 600 604 100.7% Benzo{g~,i)Pe~lene- pg/kg 0000136-68 21.0 6OO 623 t 00.3% O.2% Sample Spike ~ QC Test Pet (%) RPD SEDIMENT Naphthalene-p~k8 0017044-05 600 594 99.% Acenaphthylene-pg/kg 0017044-05 600 60I ~00.2% Ac~'naphlhene-~g/kg 00 ! 7044-05 600 603 100.5% FIt~'one-pg/kg 00 ] 70~4-05 600 602 100.3% Phenanthren~-pl~g 0017044-05 600 604 100.'P~ Anthracene-ps/kg 0017044-05 60O 594 99.% Fluoranthent:-pg/kg 0017044-05 600 591 98.5% ['yrene-pg/kg 0017044-05 6O0 61 I [~enzo(a)an thracene-p g/kg 0017044-05 6OO 608 101.3% ~l~sene-p ~a<g 0017044-05 600 603 1003% ESenzo(b )fluoramhene-~t g/k g 0017044-05 6OO 586 97.T'A aenzo(k)fl uoranthene- ~/k8 0017044-05 600 605 1 00.8% aenzo(a)pyrene-pg/kg 001 7044-05 600 600 100.% Indeno(l,2,3-cd)Py~ne-pg/kg 0017044-05 600 607 101.2% 3ibenzo(a,h)Ant~raeene-p g/kg 0017044 -05 600 596 99.3% : Benz°(g,h,i)Perylere-~g/k8 0017044-05 6OO 59? 99.5% Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Bulk Sediment - PAHts by 8270C BLANK 2.Fluorobipheny~ t01% 60 130 Type of Q~ Surrogates t % Recovered I o~ _L!mit~_?/.)~ ICONTROI- 2-FkJorobiphenyl ~ ...... 1'{~2~- _.~0 [._1_~ ._: ',~'dr~)-£- ........... ~n~-5 ..... 99~ ....60 [ 140: Type?f~QC ~u_.rr~_~ ............ ?~ R~cm, Ared __QC._t.imi(s (%) DUPLICATE 2-Fluorobiphenyl 104% 60 130-: ,MS 9-~h~o~biphenyJ 103% 60 J 1301 !MS Nitrobeftzene-d5 101% ! 60 130 i Type ofQC 'Surrogates ................. °/. Reeov;r-ed' -' ~ -~i~its (%) ! ~D 2.=~.o~p.o.~ i to~% 60 13o! SP~4 2~Floorobip~enyl 103% 0 0 , Order//: 0708483 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, l.c. 165 Grace), Avenue, Meri.den, CT 06451 Phone: (203) 634-3731 Fax: (203) 630-1336 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Bulk Sediment - Pesticides by EPA 8081B Oraer~: 070S~S~ BL.4NK LA~-IO# Sample Spike QCTesI Pct (%) L RPD i SEUIIMENT Concentr. Concentr. ~ R~ult Recove~ Md~n'p~8 O017152-02 BDL :~Chlo~p~g 00 { 7152-02 BDL m~C~iord~-p~g 00 { 7 ] 52-02 BDL }ci~No~hl~-p~g 0017152-02 BDL ~s-~hlor-p~g 0017 { 52-02 BDL Oxychlord~-~g 0017152-02 BDL 4,4'-D~-g~g 0017152-02 BDL 4,4'-DDE'~8 0017152-02 BDL 4,4'-DD~p~g 0017152-02 BDL Dieldrimp~g ~17152-02 BDL alpha-~d~ul f~p~g ~ 17152-02 BDL ~'~f~P~g 0017152-02 BDL ~6mP~g 0017152-02 BDL Hep~lor-p~g ~17152-02 BDL Hepm~lor E~xi~p~g 0017152-02 BDL H~p~g ~ 17152-02 BDL Li~p~B ~ 17152-02 BOL Mc~o~or-g~g ~ 17152-02 BDL roxa~p~g ~17152-02 BDL ~Bs, ]bml-p~g 0017152-02 BDL ]CONTROL LA'ID ~ Sample Spike ~Tes~ Pet(e/o) RPD SEDIM~ Concen/r. Conceal. ~ R~ult Reeove~ ~ldfin-g~g ~ 17152-03 40.0 40.0 I~.% :i~Chlo~-p~g 0017152-03 40.0 38.2 95.5% t~o~p~g ~ 17152-03 40.0 39 I 97 8% c~No~l~-p~g 0017152-03 40.0 38.3 95.8% I~s-No~lor-p~g ~17152-03 400 38.4 ~y~o~p~g ~17152-03 40.0 37.6 4,4'-D~-~8 ~ 17152-03 ~.0 394 98 5% 4,4'-DDE-p~g ~l 7152-03 40.0 ~.2 1~.5% 4,4'-DD~g~g 0017152-03 40.0 39 1 97.8% D~ldrin-p~g 0017152-03 400 39.6 ~.% alp~-E~lf~-g~g 0017 ] 52-03 40 0 39.6 ~a-~aul f~-p~g 0017 ] 52-03 400 40.2 I ~ 5% ~dfin-p~g 0017152-03 400 39.6 [~cptachlor-~g ~] 7152-03 400 39.8 99.5% ~cp~lor E~xidc-p~g 0017 [ 5~-03 400 392 98.% ~e~chloroben~n~g~g 0017152-03 40 0 406 101 5% :Lmd~p~g 00 ] 7 [ 52-03 40.0 40.2 l~.5% Me&oxychlor-p~g 00 ] 7 ] 52-03 40.0 39.4 985% ConnecticUt Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Bulk Sediment - Pesticides by EPA 8081B OrderS: 0708483 i CONTROL LAB-ID # Sample Spike QC Te~t Pot (%) RPD ~ SEDIMENT Concentr. Concen/r. Result Recovery {Toxaphcne-pg~kg 0017152-03 { 1,200 { 1,3~0 112.S% Sample Spike ~ QC Test Pct (%) RPD AId~n-p~g 00001 ~6-67 BDL BDL 0.% c~Chlordam-p~g 00~ I ~647 BDL BDL 0.% ~-Chlmd~p~g 0000136-67 BDL BDL i~N~l~-p~g ~136-67 BDL BDL ~n~Non~hlor-p~g 0~ 136-67 BDL BDL 0.% ~ychlord~-p~g 0~ 1 ~67 BDL BDL 0.% 4,4'-DDT-p~g 0~ 136-67 BDL BDL 0.% 4,4'-DDE-p~g 00~136-67 1.9 1.9 0.% D~ld~n-~8 ~00136-67 BDL BDL 0.% .Iph~-~.~l f~g 0~013647 BDL BDL 0.% ~d~n-p~8 0~0136-67 BDL BDL 0.% ~pmchlor-~ 0000~36-67 BDL BDL 0,% ~p~chlor ~xid~p~g 0000136-67 ~DL BDL 0.% H~nchloro~z~p~g 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% Lin~p~g 0000136-6? BDL BDL 0% Metho~chl~-p~g 0~0136-67 BDL BDL ~Bs, Total-~g 0~0136-67 ~.6 2o. 8 8.3% ~M~ Sample Spike ~ QC T~t Pet (%) ~D Mdfimp~g 0000136-67 BDL 40.0 39. I ;i>Chlorda~-p~g 0000136-67 BDL 40.0 363 ~.~ ~hlord~-p~g 000013~67 BDL 40.0 38.1 95.3% :~-No~lor-p~g 0~l 3~7 BDL 40.0 3K7 ~No~lor-g~g 0~0136-67 BDL ~.0 36. I ~.3% 3~o~-~g 0~013647 BDL 40.0 39.1 ~.8% ~,4'-DDT-p~g 0~ 13~67 BDL 40.0 38. I 95.3% 1,4'-DDE-p~g 0~0136-67 L9 400 S L9 L4'-DD~p~g 0000136-67 5 1 40 0 56.0 127.3% Dieldfin-p~g 0000136-67 BDL 40.0 35.9 dp~-~osul f~-~g 0000136-67 BDL 4&0 37.7 ~.3% ~-~1 fan-p~g 0000136-67 BDL 40.0 41.2 ~dfin-p~g 0000136-67 BDL 40.0 38.7 ~le~lor- p~g ~00136-67 BDL 40.0 39.5 98.8% ~epl~hlor E~xide-g~g 0000136-67 BDL 400 38.7 Con.ecticut Testiug Laboratories, Inc. 165 Gracey Avenue, Meri.den, CT 06451 Phone: (203) 634-3731 Fax: (203) 630-1336 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Bulk Sediment - Pesticides by EPA 8081B Order//: 0708483 MS i LAB-ID# Sample Spike QC Test Pet (%) RPD i SEDIMENT Coiceat~. Concentr. R~ult Recove~ ~M~n~p~g 0000136-67 BDL 40.0 41.8 I ~.5% 2in~n~g~8 0~136-67 BDL 40.0 41.3 103.3% He~chlor-p~8 0000136-67 BDL 400 ~.l I 153% Toxaphcnc-p~g 0000136-67 BDL I~ 1,0g0 89 ?A ~ Sarape Spike ~ Test MSD ~m ~ Concentr. Contenlr. i Result Recove~Pcl (%) RPD I SEDIMENT Aldfin*~g 0~0136-67 BDL 40.0 384 ~.% cis-Chlo~a~-p~g 0~0136-67 BDL 400 35 1 87.~A 3.4% ~C~o~-~g 0~ 13~7 BDL 40.0 ~.6 91.5% ci~-No~-p~g 0~ ] 36-67 BDL 400 37.1 92.8% 4.~ ~-~l~-~g ~ 136~7 BDL ~.0 ~.4 ~.% 4.~ ~chl~p~g 0~013~67 BDL 40.0 37.2 93.% 43"DDT-p~8 0~136-67 BDL 400 30.6 76~5% 21.8% 4,4'-~E-g~g 0000136-67 L9 4O.O ~2 120.a% 3.3% 43'-DD~p~g 0~ ] 36-67 5. I 40.0 56. I 127.5% Dield~p~g 0~0136-67 BDL 40.0 34.0 ~.% 5.4% alp~-~dmul f~-p~g ~00136-67 BDL 40.0 36.8 ~.% 2.4% ~-P~g ~00136-67 BDL 40 0 39.7 ~.3% ~n-a~ ~00136-67 BDL 40.0 37 0 ~.~A 4.5% ['le~l~-g~g 0000136-67 BDL 40.0 38.2 95.5% 3.3% [~e~chlor E~xide-~g 0~0136-67 BDL 400 37.9 94.8% 2.1 Hexachl~p~g 0000136-67 BDL 400 40.5 I 01.3% 3.2% Lin~g~g 0~0136-67 BDL 40.0 4 I. I I ~.8% 0.5% ~°~chl°r'g~8 0000136-67 BDL 40.0 35.4 88.5% Foxa~e-g~g 0000136-67 BDL 1,2~ ~ 82.5% 8. ~ SED~ENT Con~ntr- Conten~. ; R~ulI R~ove~ Aldd~p~g 0017152-05 ~.0 61.5 102.5% c~hl~p~g ~17152-05 ~.0 59.0 98.3% ~o~P~ 0017152-05 ~.0 ~9.7 cis-Nona~l~.p~g 00 ] 7 ] 52-05 ~0 58.7 97.8% ~n~No~hlor-p~g 0017152-05 ~.0 59.7 99.5% ~yc~or~-p~g 0017152-05 60.0 58.9 98.2% 4,4'-DDT-p~8 00] 7152-05 ~ 0 ~ 0 4A'-DDE-p~g 0017152-05 ~0 6 t 0 ~0 I 4,4'-DD~p~g 0017152-05 ~.0 ~.5 Die~d~n-p~g ~] 7 ] 52-05 60.0 ~.7 101.2% alpha- E~osul~-p~g 00 [ 7152-05 ~ 0 ~ 4 I~ 7% ~ta-E.dosul f~-p~g 0017152-05 600 62.6 1~.3% E~rin-p~g 0017152-05 60 0 6L2 ~ 02.% Connect/cut Testing Labaratories, I~tc. 165 Gracey Avenue, Meri~Jen, CT 06451 Phone: (203) 634-3731 Fax: (203) 630-1336 ConnecticUt Testing LabOratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Bulk Sediment - Pesticides by EPA 8081B OrderO: 0708483 Sample Spike QC Test Pet (%) RPD iSR. M LAI~.] D # Concentr. Concentf. Result Recown-y SEDIMENT Hepmchlor-pg/k8 0017152-05 60.0 6l.I 101.8% Hepmc~lor Epoxidc-gg/kg 0017152-05 ~0.0 61.2 102.% Hcxachlorobenzene-pg/k8 0017 ] 52-05 60.0 59.8 99.7% Lindane-pg/k8 00] 7 ] 59-05 60.0 61.9 103.2% Melhonychlor-lag/kg 0017152-05' 60.0 60.4 100.7% Toxaphene-gg/k~ 00 ! 7152-05 1,200 1300 ~08.6% i Type~[~ $.rrogates i %Reco, ered iQC Umits(%)i [CONTROL - ~ 4'-DDD'SR ' '~" '~ ] ~60 i Type of QC Surrogates , % Recovered i QC Limits (%)! !bUh.-~'-~ ............ i.i':~' ~- -- ~b~'"'-'~"-~'~-] - 13-o iMS 4'-DDD-SR . 120% ! 70 ~ 1301 I~ Type of QC Surr~at~ ~ ........ R~e~d ~'~ Um~ts'~ (%) ~ ~MSD ~'-DD~R 113% ~ 70 1~ I ' Connecticut Testing Laboratories, htc. 165 Gracey Avenue, Meri0en, CT 06451 Phone: (203) 634-3731 Fax: (203) 630-1336 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Bulk Sediment Mirex or~er~: ~70a4s~ BL4NK ~A~m # S.mp~ Spik~ ~ OC T.t P~t (%) ~CO~ROL ~m g Samp~ Spike ~ ~ Test Pct (%) RPO ~DUPLIC~ TE ~m g Sample 8pi~ ~ Tesl Pet (%) RPD S~IM~ Concentr. Concen~. ~ R~ult Recove~ iMirex-g~g ~136-67 ~ BDL ' BDL 0.% [B~K ]N~n~n~5 ~ 102% ! 60 130 ~ ~ Ty~ of~ lS.~r~.t.. % R~ered t QC Limi~ COBOL 2-F~p~ ' ~7% 60 ~ 140 ~ ~CO~ROL N~tmbenzen~5 79% ~ 60 ~ 140; [ Ty~ of~ Sarr~al~ ' % R~overed ~ QC Limits (%); DUPLI~T~ ~Te~nyl~ 14 75% 60 1~ ] Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. 165 Gracey Avenue, Meri~den, CT 06451 Phone: (203) 63J-3731 Fax: (203) 630-1336 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Bulk Sediment TOC / Water Order#: 0708483 Sample Spike QC Test Pct (%) RPD ~To~I Or~ic C~fl-% 0017149-02 ] ] BDL Sample Spike ~ QC T~t Pet (%) RPD ~DUPLICATE ~n~mo Coacea~. Conceaff. ~ R~ult R~ove~ ~mpl~ Spike[ : ~T~t Pcl (%) RPD ~MS ~ID g Concentr. Co~en~. ~ R~ul1 R~ov~ ~ SEDIM~T To~ ~ C~-% 0~0136-68 { 1.2 S.0 { 7aa SEDIM~ To~ ~ic C~n-% ~00136-68 { 1'2 8.0 { 6'88 71.% ~ Sample Spike QC Test Pti (%) S~ ~ID ~ Co~entr. Concentr. [To~ O~nieC~n-% 0017149-05 I 3.3 { 3.55 107.6% Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. 165 Gracey Avenue, Meri~len, CT 06451 Phone: (203) 634-3731 Fax: (203) 630-1336 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. SEDIMENT ~lordane-ug/~g CONTROL SEDIMENT Chlordane-ug/Kg QUALITY CONTROL REPORT EPA 8081 Chlordane - RCP OrderS: 070S4~ Sample LAB-ID # Concentr. 0017893-0:2 ] Sample LAB-ID # Coneeatr. 0017893-03 I Spike : QC Test Concenfr. Result I BDL Spike QC Test Concentr. Result 40.0 i 38.7 Type of QC Surrogates 1% Recovered I QC Limits (%) iBLANK Tetrac~loro-m-Xyie~e-$R 97% BLANK Decachlombipheny!-SR 95% 70 ] 130 TypeofQC Surrogates i %Recovered :, QC Limits(%)i !CONTROL ~-etrachloro-m-Xylene-SR : 102% i 0 I 0 ICONTROL ' DecachlorobiphenyI-SR ~ 106% Pet (%) RPD Recovery Pet (%) RPD Recovery Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. 165 Gracey Avenue, Meriden, CT 06451 Phone: (203) 634-3731 Fax: (203) 630-1336 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT EPA 8260B BTEX Compounds Orderg: 0708483 Sample Spike QC Test Pct (%) RPD ~BL4NK LAB-ID # Concentr. Concenlr. Result Recovery SEDIMENT Benzene-ug/Kg 0017782-02 BDL Tolucn~-ug/Kg 0017782-02 BDL Ethyl Benzene-up/Kg 0017782-02 BDL p/m-Xylene-u~/g§ 0017782-02 BDL o-Xyl~e-ug/K~ 00! 7782-02 BDL ~ ,4- Dichlorobenzene- ug/K g 0017782-02 BDL 1,3-Diehlomben~n~ug/Kg 0017782-02 BDL 1,2- Dichlorobenzc~- ug/Kg 0017782-02 BDL MTn£-oS/Kg 0017782-02 BDL iCONTROL Sample Spike i QC Test Pet (%) RPD LAB-ID # Concentr. Concentr. i Resale Recovery SEDIMENT Ber~ene-ug/Kg 0017782-03 160 148 92.5% Toluene-ug/K8 0017782-03 160 152 95% Ethyl Benzene-ug/Kg 0017782-03 160 157 98.1% ffm-Xylene-ug/Kg 0017782-03 320 319 99. 'P/~ o-Xylen~-ug/Kg 0017782-03 16o 156 97.5% 1,4 -Dichlorobenzcnc'ug/K 8 0017782-03 1~0 I~0 10o.% 1,3- Dichlo robenzen¢-ug/Kg 0017782-03 160 159 99.4% 1,2-Dichlombenzenc-ug/K g 0017782-03 160 166 103.8% MTBE-ug/Kg 0017782-03 160 14l 88.1% Sample Spike QC Test Pet (%) RPD iDUPLIC.4 TE LAa-m # Co.ee.tr. Co.~.~. i .es.It ~eco~ery SEDIMENT B~zene-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% Toluene-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% Ethyl Benzen~-ug/K8 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% p/m-Xylene-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% o-Xylene-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% 1,4-Dichlorobcnzene-ug/K8 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% 1,3-D~chlombenzene-ug/K8 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% 1,2-Dichlorobenzene~ugtKg 0000136-67 BDL BDL 0.% MTBE-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL BDL Sample Spike i QC Test Pet (%) RPD MS LAB-ID# Concentr. Conceutr. : Result Recovery SEDIMFJqT B~nzene-ug/Kg 0000] 36-67 BDL 160 I 19 744% 'roluen~uffK8 0000136-67 BDL 160 I 16 72.5% Ethyl Benzene-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 140 275% p/m-Xylene-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDt. 320 273 85 3% o-Xylene-ug/K8 0000136-67 BDL 160 124 775% 1,4 -Dichtoro benzene- ug/K g 0000136-67 BDL 160 126 78.8% 1,3 -Dichlombenzene-ug/Kg 0000136-67 BDL 160 95.0 59.4% 1,2-Dichloroben~enc~ ug/K g 0000136-67 BDL 160 94.0 58.8% Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. 165 Gracey Avenue, Meri0en, Cl' 06451 Phone: (203) 634-3731 Fax: (203) 630-1336 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT EPA $260B BTEX Compounds Order//: 0708483 MS LAB-ID # Sample Spike QC Test Pet (%) RPD SEDIMENT Concentr. Concentr, Rtsult jMTB E-ug/Kg 0000136-67 I BDL iMSD i SEDiMEiNrF Benz~nc-ug/Kg Sample LAB-ID # Concenlr. 160 I 114 0000136.67 BDL 160 Tol~n~ug/K$ 0000136-67 BDL 160 EthylB~ze~-ug/Kg 0000136.67 BDL 160 p/m-Xylene-ug/Kg o-Xylene-uE/Kg 4-Dichlombenzene- ug/Kg 1,3 -Dichloroben~-ne-ug/K8 0000136-67 0000136.67 0000136-67 0000136-67 0000136.67 0000136-67 $Type of OC IBLANK !BLANK ! Type of QC BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 2 -Dichlombenzene-us/K8 MTB£-ug/Kg 320 160 160 160 160 160 132 131 131 269 120 104 104 Surrogates 2-Dichloroethane44 T~uene-d8 % Recovered QC Limits (%) [ lO1% ? 70 I1 o! 4-Bromofluorobenzene 106%, 70 I 1:30, Surrogates 1% Recovered i QC Lim0s (%): iCONTROL 2-Dichloroethane~4 82% { 0 ] 0 : [(~TROL Tol~ene-,d$ ~ i02% ' ~ i30 ~ !CONTROL 4-emmofluorobenzene ~ : ~ ~ 40 [ ~] Type of QC Surrogates % Recovered i QC Limits (%) i DUPLICATE 2-Dichlomethanc~d4 127% i 770[ 130' DUPLICATE Toluene~18 105% 770~70 130 2-Dichloroethane-d4 : 86% i 70 ro~ ! 105% 17o ~moauom~.~e ] 11o% [ 70 ;DUPLICATE ~l-Bromofluorobenzene j Type of QC Surrogates iMS 2-Dichloroethane-d4 ~ ............... toluene40 !MS ~-Bromofluorober~zene ~, Type of QC S.rrog#tes 111% 130 ne~overed i ~- Limits ('%) 81% i 70 ] 130~ 105% i 70 I 130 109% ! 70 1~ i Recovcrea i OC L~mits (%) ~ 130 130 Recovery 71.3% Pet (%) RPD Recovery 82.5% 10.4% 81.9% 121% 81.9% 6.6% 84.1% 1.5% 75.% 3.3% 65.% 19.1% 65.% 9.% 60.6% 3.1% 73.8% 3.4% Connecticut Testing Laboratories, ln~ 165 Gracey Avenue, Meri0en, CT 06451 Phone: (203) 634-3731 Fax: (203) 630-1336 Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Test Parameters Order//: 0708483 Sample Spike QC Test Pet (%) RPD iBLANK LA I~ID # Coucentr. Concentr. Result Recovery i SEDIMEi~IT lSilver, Total-mg/kg 0017582-01 I ! BDL iCONTROL Sample Spike , QC Test Pet (%) RPD ! LAB-ID# Concentr. Coneealr. ' Result Recovery ~ SEDIMENT ISilver, Tota~.mg/kg 0017582.02I 126 I, 128 101.6% ~ Sample Spike ! QC Test Pet (%) RPD ~UPLICATE LAa-zo # Co.ce.tr. Co.ce.t~. i R~.lt ~ecov~y SEDIMENT tSilver, Total-mg/kg 0000136-68 I BDL ] BDL Off. ] QC Test Pc! (%) RPD MS Sample Spike LAB-ID # Conceatr. Coueen~r. ~ Result Recovery SEDIMENT ~ Sample Spike ! QC Test Pet (%) RPD MSD LAB-lO # Coacealv. Coace.lr. i R~Ult Recovery Silver, TotaLing/kgSEDIMENT 0000136-67 ] BDL 126I125 99.2% 4.1% Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. 165 Gracey Avenue, Meriden, CT 06451 Phone: (203) 634-3731 Fax: (203) 630-1336 APPENDIX H QUALITY CON'I14OL SUMMARY TABLES Table H-l: Completeness Checklist Quality Assurance/Quality Control Questions 1. Was the report signed by thc rasponsiblc applkant approved representative? 2. Were thc methods tbr sampling, chemical and biological t~sting dcscr;Jocd in tl~ Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) and thc Laboratory QA Plan (LQAP) thllowed? 3. If not, we~c dcviatbns documented? 4. Was the SAP approved by thc New England District? ~. Did the applicant use a laboratory with a LQAP on t'~ at the New Engisnd District? I 6. Did thc samples adequately represent thc physical/chemical variabllit7 in the dradging , 7. Were the correc! stations sampk:d (includ= the precision of Iht navigation methed I 8. Were th* pr~er~atinn and ~tarag~ r~quirera*n~ in Chapter 8 of th* EPA/Corps QA/QC Manusl (EPA/USACE 1995) and EPA (200 Id) followed? 9. Were the samples pml~fly labek:d? 10. Wet= all the requested data included? 1 I. Were the reporting limits met? 12, Were th~ chair~-or.-custody t'on'ns properly processed? 13. Were thc method blanks nm and were the concentmtinn bcbw thc acceptance criteria? 14. Was the MDL stud), performed on each matrix (with this data submission) or within thc la.st 12 months? 15. Were the SRM/CRM analyses within acceptancc criteria? Yes/No? Comments? Table II-I (continued): Completeness Checklist Quality Assurance/Quality Control Questions [ Yes/No? Comments? 16. Wc~ thc matrix sp~:e/matrbc sp~V,e duplicates nm at thc requited ~qunncy and 17, Were thc duplicate samples analyzed and were thc RPDs w~in thc rcqukd acceptance criteria? 18. For each analytical t}act~on o f o~gank: compounds, were n:covetics got thc ~ntemal s~undard within Iht acceptance critm-i~? 19. Wen: surro§ate r~coverics within the rcquL,'cd acceptance criteth? 20. Were corr~tive action forms provided for all non-conforrrfing ela~? 21. Were all th~ species-specific test cond~bns in Appendix ¥ r~t? 22. Wen: the test-specific age n:quitcments met for each {cst species? 23. W~ thc bu~c physh:a.9'chcmica~ testing pct,ronr~d on thc sedh~ncnts/composites thal wen: binlogica~ tested? 24. Wen: thc morlaEly acceptance criteria mc{ for the water column and sediment toxicity tests? 25. Were thc test performance n:quin:menL~ in Table 11.3 of EPA (1994a) met? Table H-2: Quality Control Summary for Analyses ofPolyaromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and other base-neutrals in Sediment and Tissue Matrices Method Reference Number: 8270C Quality Control (QC) Acceptance Criteria* Criteria List results outside criteria I Location of Element Met? (Cross-reference resultst Results Yes/No table in data report) (Retained at Lab or in Data Package) InllJal Calibration Must be performed prior to tl~ emIysLs Retained at [.ab of any QC sample or field sample (<20 % RSD for each ¢ompotmd) Calculation of ?vlet~ofl Detection For each matrix, analyzed once per 12 In Data Package Limits (lvfDLs) month period (see Section 5,2 for MDL pmc~u~) U Calibration Yerification (Second Once, al~r initial calibration (80 to Retained at Lab Source) 120% ~ecovery ofeech compound) Continuing Calibration At thc beginning of'every t2 hour shift Retaioed at Lab Standard Reference Matefiats Within the limits provided by vendor In Data Package Method Blank No target analytes > RL In Data Package Ma~ix Spike/Matrix Spike Ore set 0vIS/MSD) per group oft'eH / In Data Package Duplicate (MS,qvlSD) samples. Must contain all target analytcs. (Recovery Limlls $0 to 120%; RPD <30%) 3 Table II-2 (continued): Quality Control Summary for Analyses of Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and other base- neutrals in Sediment and Tissue Matrices Method Rcforcocc Numbcr: 8270C Quality Control (QC) Acceptance Criteria* Criteria List results outside Location of Results Element Met? criteria (Retained at Lab Yes/No (Cross-reference results or in Data table in data rel~ort~ Package) Analytical Rcplk:atcs Anayze one sample in dup~ate for e~:h group of f'~:ld sarnpt,.s (RPD < 30%) ~ In Data Packagc Surrogate Recovcrics Calcuintc % recovery (30 to 150% recowry) ~ in Data Package Internal Standard Areas W~in 50 to 200% of internal standards in continuin~ calibration chc~k (~ in Data Package I arc general guidclincs. Ifa :mate criterta arc used, they must be documented in this table. 4 Table II-3: Quality Control Summary for Analyses of Pesticides in Sediment, Tissue and Water Matrices Method Reference Number: gO81B Quality Control (QC) Acceptance Criteria* Criteria List results outside criteria Location of Element Met? (Cross-reference results Results Yes/No table in data report) (Retained at Lab or in Data Package) Inliial Callbmtion Must be performed prior to the analysis Retained at I~b of any QC sample or fiekl sample (< 20 % RSD for each compound) Calculation of Melhed Detection For each matr~ analyzed once per 12 In Dale Packagv- Limits (MDLz) month period (sec Section 5.2 for IvlDl, Procedure) Calibration Verification (Second Once, attct initial calibration (80 to Retained nt Lab Source) 120% recovery orcach compound) Contiouiog Cah~oration Every 20 iojections (:l: 15 % D) Rctalncd at Lab Standard Reference Materials Within the limits provided by vendor In Data Package Mell~d Blank No target analytes > RL / In Data Package Matrix Spike/Matrk Spike One set (MSfMSD) per gmup of' fidd RPD <30%) Table II-3 (continued): Quality Control Summary for Analyses of Pesticides in Sediment, Tissue and Water Matrices Method Reference Number: 8081B Quallly Control (QC) Acceptance Criteria* Criteria List results outside criteria Location of Element Met? (Cross-reference results Results Yes/No table in data report) (Retained at Lab or in Data Pacl~a~e) Analytical Rcplicales Analyze one sample in duplica~ for In Data Package each group of t'etd sarnpi:s (RPD < ~ 30%) Surrogate Rccovcrias Calculate % recovery (30 to 150% In Data Package recavc~) ~ The Quality Control Acceptance Criteria are general guidelines. If alternate criteria are used, they must be documented in this table. 6 Table II-4: Quality Control Summary for Analyses ofPolychorinated Biphenyls (PCB congeners) in Sediment, Tissue and Water Matrices Method Reference Number: 8082A Quality Control (QC) Acceptance Criteria* Criteria List results outside Location of Element Met? criteria Results Yes/.N0 (Cross-reference results (Retained at Lab table in data report) o'tin Data Package) Initial Calibration Must be p~ffonand prbr to thc analysis Rctain~ at Lab orany QC sampl~ or/"eld sample (<20 aA RSD for each compound) Calculation o F Method Detection For each matrix, analyzed once per 12 In Data Package L~i~ (MDLs) month period (see Section ;5.2 for MDL procedure) ~'~ Calibration Verification (Second Once, alter initial calibration. (80 to Retained at Lab Source) 120% recovery o f each compound) Continuing Calibration Every 20 ibjections (~ 15 % D) Retained at Lab Standard Refertnc¢ Materials Withib tho limits provided by vendor In Data Package Method Blank No target analytes > RL ~ In Data Package Duplk:ate (MS/MSD) samples. Must contain all target ,A~ ~ r ~'""~/P RPD <30%) = fig- nj I(c'o ) is,.; C Table I1.-4 (continued): Quality Control Summary for Analyses of Polychorinated Biphenyls (PCB congeners) in Sediment, Tissue and Water Matrices Method Reference Number: 8082A Quality Control (QC) Acceptance Criteria* Criteria List resuits outside Location of Element Met? criteria Results Yes/No (Cross-reference results (Retained at Lab table in data report) or in Data enc eI Analytical Replicates Analyze or~ sampk in duplicate for In Data Package ~ ,each g~oup of f~:ld sampks (RPD < 3O%) Surrogate Recoveries Cak:tda~¢ % ~tcovesy (30 to 150% In Data Package * The Quality Control Acceptance Criteria arc general guidelines. If alternate criteria are used, they must be documented in this table. Table H-5: Quality Control Summary for Analyses of Metals in Sediments, Tissue and Water Matrices Method Reference Numbers: Various ReferenCe Numbers Quality Control (QC) Acceptance Criteria* Criteri List results outside criteria Location of Element a Met? (Cross-reference results . Results Yes/No table in data report) (Retained at Lab or in Data Package) I.incar Range Determination for Perfom~d Quaflerly geta~ed at Lab ICP ~ Initial Calibration for AA, Hg Pcfformcd DaVy (ConClation Retained at Lab Coefflciant ~0.995) ~ Calculation of Method Detection For each matrix, analyzed once per 12 In Data Package Limits (IvIDL$) month period (se~ Section 5.2 for IVlDL pr°c~ure) ~ Initial Calibration Verification/ Hg: 80 ~o 120% r~covcry Retained at Lab Contiouiog Calibr~ion Other metals: 90 Io 110% recovery Vcri£~:ation ~ lnitial Calib~tinn Blank/ No ta~t anal~ > lastmmcato~ ~.~ Rotained ~t Lab Continuios Cldibrati~n Blank l~¢tBn Limit {IDL) ~ Standard Reference Materials Within tho limits provided by vendor ! In Data Package Blank No target analytes > RL L/._~f,,,~ In Da~a Package Method 9 In Data Package Table II-5 (continued): Quality Control Summary for Analyses of Metals in Sediments, Tissue and Water Matrices Method Reference Numbers: Various Reference Numbers Quality Control (QC) Acceptance Criteria* Criteri List results outside criteria Location of Element a Met? (Cross-reference results Results Yes/No table in data repor0 (Retained at Lab or in Data Analytical Replicates Ana~ze one sample in duplicate for ea~htJ~ In Data Package ~mup of fekt san~les (RPD < 3~%t ]'he Quality Control Acceptance Criteria are general guidelines. :c criteria are used, they must be documented in this table. 10 Table II-6: Quality Control Summary for Analyses ofother Organic Chemicals not listed in Sediment, Tissue and Water Matrices Method Reference Numbers: Quality Control (QC) Acceptance Criteria* Criteria List results outside criteria Location of Element Met? (Cross-reference results Results Yes/No table in data report) (Retained at Lab or in Data Paeknge) Initial Calibration [ Must be pcrformtd prior to the analysis Retained at Lab of any QC sample or fielcl sample.(<20 ~/ ~ % RSD for ~ach compound) Calculation ofM=thod Delectibn For each matrix, ana~d once per 12 In Data Package Limits IMDLs) month pe6od (see S¢c~ibn 5.2 for MDL procedure) Calibration Vcril~cation (Second Once, after ~aitia[ calibration (80 to Retained a~ Lab Source) 12(P/o t=covcry of each compound) Conlibuibg Calibra:ion i At the begitu~iog or'every 12 hour shift Rctaiaed at Lab (:e If % D) Standard Reference Materials Within the limits provided by vendor In Data Package Method Blank No target analytos > RL In Data Packag~ Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike : One set (MS/MSD) per group of f'=kl In Data Package Duplicate (MS/MSD) samples. Must contain all target : analytes, (Recov¢iT Limits 50 to ~~ 120%i RPD <30%) 11 Table II-6 (continued): Quality Control Summary for Analyses of other Organic Chemicals not listed in Sediment, Tissue and Water Matrices Method Reference Numbers: Quality Control (QC) Acceptance Criteria* Criteria List results outside criteria Location of Element Met? (Cross-reference results Results Yes/No table in data report) (Retained at Lab or in Data Analytical Replicates Analyze one sample hx duplicate for In Data Package each gloup of f'~ekt samples (RPD < 30%) Surrogate Recoveries Calculate % recovery (30 to 150% In Data Package recovery) Interne S~andard Areas W~thln 50 to 200% ot'internal stand.'ds In Data Package (~ applicabk:) i~ continuin~ calibration check * Thc Quality Control Acceptance Criteria are general ~idelines. If alternate criteria are used, they must be documented in this table. 12 Table II-7: Quality Control Summary for Analyses of Sediment Grain Size and Total Organic Carbon Mcthod Reference Numbers: Qualiiy Control (QC) Acceptance Criteria* Criteria List results outside Criteria Location of Element Met? (Cross-reference results Results Yes/No table in data report) (Retained at Lab or in Data Grain Sm: Analy~ one sample in duplicate for ! In Data Package Analytica{ Replicates each g~oup of f~ld sa.'np ks ( RPD < 22%) ~/to Total organic Carbon: W~hin the limits provided by vendor, I~ In Data Package Standard Rcfc~er~c Matcl~aLs ~ 'I'o~al Organic Carbon: Analyze one sample ~n duplicate for In Data Package Ana~ical Replicates each group of reid samples (RPD < i 30%) ,t~ The Quality Control Acco )tance Criteria arc general guidelines. If £ernatc criteria arc used, they must be documented in this table. 13 Table II-8: Quality Control Summary for Biological Toxicity Testing only Method Reference Numbers: Quality Control (QC) Acceptance Criteria* Criteria List results outside criteria Location of Element Met? (Cross-reference results Results Yes/No table in data report) (Retained at Lab or in Data Package) Test conditinn requirements for each In Data Package speaies: Temperature, Salinity. pH. D.O.. Test conditions within the Ammonia (Total, Un-ionized) requh'ernents specified for each species Test spccics age Agedh~th within guidelines for each In Dam Package species (Appendix V) Bulk physical/chemical analyses (ir Requbed? If so, performed? Yes or No in Data Package n:cluired by the Sampling plan) Water coh~mn toxicity [cst: In Data Package Control mortality _< 10% mean Control abnormally/ 5. 30% mussel/oyster; ~_ 40% clam lan/ac, _< 30% sea urchin lan, ac Sediment loxicity test: In Data Package Control mortality _< 10% mean (no chamber > 20%) Compliance with applicable See EPA (1994a) Section 9; Table test acceplability requirements in Table 11.3 (EPA 1994a} ~uality Control Acceptance Criterta are general guidelines. If alternate criteria are used, they must be documented in this table. 14 Date Samples Received: 7/17/08 Client Name: Docko, Inc. CTL Lab No.: 0708483 Report Date: 10/7108 PO/Job No. : FIYC RESULTS OF ANALYSIS Washed Sieve Analysis ASTM D.422/D-1 t40 Date Analyzed: 7118108 Matrix Type: S S S S CTL Sample No.: 12646 12647 12648 12649 Field ID: FIYC-1 FIYC-2 FIYC-3 FIYC-4 Percent by Wt. Passing Sieve Size No. 4 99.7 99.5 99.6 100.0 No. 10 98.6 98.6 98.6 99.6 No. 40 93.1 96.1 96.7 96.2 No. 200 87.1 93.3 94.7 38.4 Matrix Type: S S CTL Sample No.: t 2650 12646 Field ID: FIYC-5 FIYC-1 Duplicate Percent by Wt. Passing Sieve · S~e JNo. 4 No. 10 99.7 98.5 No. 40 94.4 93.5 No. 200 40.2 88:7 100.0 J 99.7 MDL= Method Detec{ion Level/BDL= ~elaw DetedJon Le'vet Matrix Type: W-l- Water/Aqueous S= Soil/Solid O= Oil/Hydrocarbon Connecticut Testing Laboratories, Inc. 165 Gracey Avenue l Meriden, CT 06451 (203) 634-3731 (Fax) 630-1336 Certification CT-PH05471 MA-CT035 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 Main Rd. & Youngs Ave. South#Id, NY 11971 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 South#Id, NY 1197l Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: Jim King, President Town of South#Id Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Scott A. Hilary, LWRP Coordinator Date: March 24, 2009 Re: Chapter 268, WATERFRONT CONSISTENCY REVIEW Wetland Permit for FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB SCTM# 10-1-9 Dock#, Inc. on behalf of FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB requests a Wetland Permit to dredge 13,000 cy.~ of sandy silt with a 1' over-dredge allowance of 6,000 ey. over 145,000 sf. by clamshell bucket for open water disposal at New London. Remove existing "A' dock with sailing program float, "B" dock with floating "T" end and dinghy dock, construct 36 If. of 7' wide main pier extension and seven 30'X 4' fixed fingers with associated support and tie- off/fender piles. Install 228 If. of S' wide main float with eighteen 20'X 3' finger floats, 216 If. of 8' wide main float with thirteen 20'X 3' finger floats, two 20'X 4' finger floats, two 13'X 42' and one 19'X 42' sail floats all with associated ramps, restraint piles and tie-off/finger piles. Reconstruct or replace an existing 12'X 20' floating dinghy dock waterward of the apparent high water line, and install a small boat crane landward of the apparent high water line. Located: Central Ave., Fishers Island. SCTM#10-1-9 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of South#Id Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is INCONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards and therefore is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of South#Id ecosystem. 6.3 Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands. A. Comply with statutory and regulatory requirements of the SouthoM Town Board of Trustees laws and regulation for all Andros Patent and other lands under their jurisdiction 1. Comply with Trustee regulations and recommendations as set forth in Trustee permit conditions. The subject parcel (SCTM# 10-1-9) is zoned R-80 Residential. Only one catwalk (dock) is permitted per residential lot pursuant to § 275-11. Therefore~ the proposed actions are not in compliance with § 275-11 Construction and operation standards as referenced below. § 275-11 Construction and op~e tion standards. C. In water. The following standards are required for all in-water operations adjacent to residential properties. Operations conducted on properties zoned MI or M2 may be given greater flexibility in these requirements given the water-dependent nature of their use. (2) Docks. (c) [1] Regulations for the placement and configuration of docking facilities. Residential docks. [al Only one catwalk may be permitted per residential lot. Only one mooring or dock may be permitted per residential lot. Upon a showing of special need due to Iow water level and hazard to property, the Trustees may permit both a mooring and a dock for the same residential property. Furthermore~ zoning use regulations for lots zoned R-80 would prohibit the actions~ as proposed pursuant to § 280-13. § 280-13 Use regulations. In A-C, R-80, R-120, R-200 and R-400 Districts, no building or premises shall be used and no building or part ora building shall be erected or altered which is arranged, intended or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for any uses except the following: (3) Boat docEng facilities for the doc/ring, mooring or accommodation of noncommercial boats, subject to the following requirements: There shah be docking or mooring facilities for no more than two boats other than those owned and used by the owner of the premises fdr his personal use. (b) The Town Trustees shall approve new boat docking facilities. (c) Boats at such docking facilities shall not be used for overnight sleeping purposes. If the agency~ Board of Trustees makes a contrary determination of consistency~ the agency shall elaborate in writing the basis for its disagreement with their recommendations Pursuant to Chapter 268 Waterfront Consistency Review. § 268-5. Review of actions. H. In the event the LWRP Coordinator's recommendation is that the action is inconsistent with the LWRP, and the agency makes a contrary determination of consistency, the agency shall elaborate in writing the basis for its disagreement with the recommendation and state the manner and extent to which the action is consistent with the L WRP policy standards. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. 0 James King. President Hen~' Smith Attic FoYer Ken Pollwoda Town Hall 53095 *,lain Ro~ P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (5161765.1892 F~xlSI6) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD /Received Application: / Received Fee: ~k%]~f v-~Completed Application Incomplete SEQRA Classification: Type I X Type II Unlisted X Coordination: (date cant) CAC Referral Sent: t;9~J~91Uq ._//bate of Inspection: ~1 09 __ Receipt of CAC Report: Lead Agency Determination: Technical Review: u/Public Hearing Held: ~1{~O~ __ Resolution: ~ ~/3~_~p ~qlO~ Office Use Only Name of Applicant FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUGB Address P. O. BOX E, FISHERS ISLAND, NY 06390 Phone Number: (631) 788-7036 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: I000 - 010-1-9 Property Location: Central Avenue, southwest corner of West Harbor, Fishers Island (provide LILCO Pole %, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: DOCKO, INC., Mr. Keith B. Neilson, P.E. (If applicable) Address: P. O. BOX 42i, MYSTIC, CT 06355 860) 572-8939 Phone: Fax: 860) 572-7569 ~z~ of %~-us~cees ~licatio~ Land Area (in square feet) Area GENERAL DATA Zoning: Previous use of property: COMMERCIAL Intended use of property: COMMERCIAL Prior permits / approvals Agency U. S ArmyCo~sofEn~neers Town ofSou~old New York State DEC for site improvements: February 10, 2003 May 28, 2002 March 14, 2001 Date No prior permits / approvals for site improvements. Has any permit / approval ever been revoked or suspended governmental agency? X No Yes If yes, provide explanation: by a Project Description (use attachments if necessary) : DREDGE 13,000 (+/-) CY OF SANDY SILT WITH A I-FT. OVERDREDGE ALLOWANCE OF 6,000 (+/-) CY OVER 145,000 (+/-) SF BY CLAMSHELL BUCKET FOR OPEN WATER DISPOSAL AT NEW LONDON (NLDS). REMOVE EXISTING ~A" DOCK WITH SAILING PROGRAM FLOAT, "B" DOCK (PIER) WITH FLOTING "T" END AND DINGHY DOCK, CONSTRUCT 36 (+/-) LF OF 7- FT. WIDE MAIN PIER EXTENSION AND SEVEN 30 (+/-) LF X 4-FT. WIDE FIXED FINGERS WITH ASSOCIATED SUPPORT AND TIE-OFF/FENDER PILES. INSTALL 228 (+/-) LF OF 8-FT. WIDE MAIN FLOAT WITH EIGHTEEN 20 LF X 3-FT. WIDE FINGER FLOATS, 216 (+/-) LF OF 8-FT.WIDE MAIN FLOAT WITH THIRTEEN 20 LF X 3-FT. WIDE FINGER FLOATS, TWO 20 LF X 4-FT FINGER FLOATS, TWO 13-FT. X 42-FT AND ONE 19-FT. X 42-FT. SAIL FLOATS ALL WITH ASSOCIATED RAMPS, RESTRAINT PILES AND TIE-OFF / FENDER PILES, RECONSTRUCT OR REPLACE AN EXISTING 12' X 20' FLOATING DINGHY DOCK WATERWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER LINE. INSTALL A SMALL BOAT CRANE LANDWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER LINE. 2 Board of Trustees Application W-ETLAN'D / TRUSTEE ..IT~NDS APPLICATION DATA (NOT APPLICABLE) Purpose of tine proposed operations: Area of wetlands on lot: square feet Percent coverage of lot: % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and edge of wetlands: feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and edge of wetlands: feet upland upland Does the project involve excavation or filling: No Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated? cubic yards How much material will be filled? cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): 3 Board of Trust~es Application COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed acsiviuv: THiS SECTION NOT APPLICABLE Are wetlands present No Does the project No within 75 feet of the proposed Yes involve excavation or filling? Yes If Yes, now much material will be excavated? How much material will be filled? Manner in which material will be activity? (cubic yards) (cubic yards) removed or deposited: Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed. (Use attachments if necessary) 4 Jmnes F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vicc-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr. Town Hall, 53095Main Rd. P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone(631)765-1892 Fax (631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter o£the Application of FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING being duly'sworn1, d-epose and say: ,I That on the,..~Tdnay of H61~ 200gl personallyposted the prop.city known as by placing the Board of Trustees official poster where it can easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for eight days prior to the date of the public hearing. Date of hearing noted thereon to be held Wed. March 18~ 2009 on or about 6:00 PM. Dated: ,._~/~'/O Ct (signature) S~wom to before me this day offf~,/~00 q Pubhc '} '~-- ~ TO ADJACENT PROPERTY BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TOWN OF SOUT~OLD In the matter of applicant: FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB SCTM#1000-010-1-9 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to request a Permit from the Board of Trustees to: DREDGE 13,000 (+/-) CY OF SANDY SILT WITH A I-FT. OVERDREDGE ALLOWANCE OF 6,000 (+/-) CY OVER 145,000 (+/-) SF BY CLAMSHELL BUCKET FOR OPEN WATER DISPOSAL AT NEW LONDON (NLDS). REMOVE EXISTING "A" DOCK WITH SAILING PROGRA/4 FLOAT, "B" DOCK (PIER) WITH FLOTING ~T" END AND DINGHY DOCK, CONSTRUCT 36 (+/-) LF OF 7-FT. WIDE MAIN PIER EXTENSION ~ND SEVEN 30 {+/-) LF X 4-FT. WIDE FIXED FINGERS WITH ASSOCIATED SUPPORT AND TIE- OFF/FENDER PILES. INSTALL 228 (+/-) LF OF 8-FT. WIDE PLAIN FLOAT WITH EIGHTEEN 20 LF X 3-FT. WIDE FINGER FLOATS, 216 (+/-) LF OF 8-FT.WIDE MAIN FLOAT WITH THIRTEEN 20 LF X 3-FT. WIDE FINGER FLOATS, TWO 20 LF X 4-FT FINGER FLOATS, TWO 13-FT. X 42-FT A~D ONE ig-FT. X 42-FT. SAIL FLOATS ALL WITH ASSOCIATED RAMPS, RESTRAINT PILES AND TIE-OFF / FENDER PILES, RECONSTRUCT OR REPLACE AN EXISTING 12' X 20' FLOATING DINGHY DOCK WATERWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER LINE. INSTALL A SMALL BOAT CRANE LANDWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER LINE. 2. That the property which is the is located adjacent to your follows: subject of Environmental Review property and is described as THE SITE IS LOCATED ON CENTRAL AVENE IN THE SOUTHWESTERN CORNER OF WEST HARBOR. 3. That the property which is subject to Environmental Review under Chapters 32, 37, or 97 of the Town Code is open to public comment. You may contact the Trustees Office at 765- 1892 or in writing. The above referenced proposal is under review of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold and does not reference any other agency that might have to review same proposal. OWNERS N~LME: FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB MAILING ADDRESS: P.O.BOX E FISHERS ISLAND, NY 06390 PHONE (631) 788-7036 Enc.: Copy of sketch or plan showing proposal for your convenience. 5 M~ILI~( ~ U IFTED ~ r-, Pocta~e (E~orsement R, Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) ,-t ~-1 T0~ Postage & Fees ~sidin~ sworn deport r. rd of ersons ~t th~..n he add~ :o~ o - the that said Notices (certified) (registered) MYSTIC, CT , persons by (Eedorsernent Required) Restricted Delivery F~ I ~04~AL USE I Pomage Sworn to before me this /._~7~'/~- ~a~ of ~A~r~ , 2ooq ~ - Nota~ Publi~ ~' FISliEFtS ISLAI~ XACHT CLUB~:l,:l~.,' ' DULl .'"' h.~ ;~E~'O:;b[; AI4D AFFIRMS THAT IT [S THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRi ~ED PERMIT~°% AND THAT ALL oFPTEHEN~ CONTAINED HEREIN ARE ~Rdm TO ;HE h~.Si O[ HiS/HER KNuwLELrLE AHD BE!,~L?', AND ~HAT ALi, WO[-K WibL }%] I.)ONE TN THE MANNER SET FORTH iN THiS AFPLiCATiON AND AS MAY HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING ~J:~DmR OR B't' ,,r ~, , OF SATD PrR~ T ,. , TF ~RANTED. ~N COMPLETING AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVE(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO ~.' t ~$,::~.~E., ~ ,.,N,. ;.~'. ~ t,;~ WiTH REVIEW OF APPI,ICATTON. ~ublic ~ '7 Trustees App~catlo AUTHORIZATION (where the app~ ~,.ant is not the owner) FISHERS ISLAND YACHT owner of property) residing on CENTRAL AVENUE (mailing address] FISHERS iSLAND, NY do hereby au%horJze DOCK(), iNC., (Agent.) NY S!'iC, CT Southo!d Board of "" , .... my behalt ~.~om the ....... (Owne~ s sigzanuYei LUCINDA HERRTCK, COMMODORE FISHERS iSLAND YACHT CLUB 8 C~o~ko ~ ~ nc, Serving the waterfront community since 1987 P.O. Box 421, Mystic, CT 06355 (860) 572-8939 Fax: (860) 572-7569, email: docko~snet.net February 16, 2009 Ms Lauren Standish Southold Board of Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Fishers Island Yacht Club Revised Narrative Statemem Dear Ms Standish: In order to make the Narrative Statement and Supplemental Information of January 19, 2009 consistent with the application drawings, we have added the full project description to the first page. Please replace this revised first page accordingly. Yours truly, DOCKO, INC. Keith B. Neilson, P.E. KBN:cg Enclosure CC: FIYC: Hen'ick, Tremaine File: 00-03-1078 F.I.Y.C. FEB FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB WEST HARBOR FISltrERS ISLAND FEB 1 9 2009 NARRATIVE STATEMENT & SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION JANUARY 19, 2009 REVISED ~ GENERAL Fishers Island Yacht Club leases parcel 1000-010-1-9, owned by the Fishers Island Development Company, off of Central Avenue located along the west shore of West Harbor on Fishers Island. The site is flat to gently sloped, sandy, gravel earthen materials, vegetated with grass, brush, ground cover and trees. The frontage of the property is approximately 300 feet along West Harbor abutted by the Goose Island Corporation to the east and Ms. Penelope Sharp to the west. The waterfront consists of a rock revetment lined shore along the north, tidal wetlands fringe vegetation at the base of the gently sloped tree-lined terrace to the south and west of the dock facilities. It is the Fishers Island Yacht Club's desire to make dock modifications to their piers and floating dock system south of the main pier and dredge to optimize the geometry and usefulness of the dock facilities. Attached are application drawings prepared for this project. This supplemental narrative has been prepared in accordance with the requiremems of Town of Southold, Ordinance No. 6, 2004, and the Waterfront Revitalization Program related to docks and shorefrom improvements. In addition, various coastal policies under the New York State Coastal Management Act are addressed herein for review by the New York State Department of State and Department of Environmental Conservation. DESCRIPTION OF WORK The project is to replace various wood floating docks with concrete floating docks and finger piers, make minor modifications to the fixed pier at the southeast end of the dock fac'flifies and dredge 13,000 (+/-) CY of marine sandy silts mechanically over an area of 145,000 (+/-) SF with a one-foot overdredge allowance of 6,000 (+/-) CY for open water disposal at the New London open water disposal are (NLDS) in Long Island Sound. Construct 36 (+/-) LF Of 7-Ft wide main pier extension and seven 30 (+/-) LF by 4-Ft wide fixed finger piers with associated support and tie-off/fender piles. Install 228 (+/-) LF of 8-Ft wide main float with eighteen 20 LF by 3-Ft wide finger floats, 216 (+/-) LF of 8-Ft wide main float with thirteen 20 LF by 3-Ft wide finger floats, two 20 LF by 4-Ft finger floats, two 13-Ft by 42-Ft and one 19-Ft by 42-Ft floats for the sailing program, all with associated ramps, restraint piles and tie-off/fender piles. Reconstruct or replace an existing 12-Ft by 20-Ft dinghy float, waterward of the apparent high water line. Install a small boat crane landward of the apparent high water line. All work is to be in accordance with existing guidelines set forth by the US Army Corps of Engineers (NY and New England Regions), the NYS DEC, NYS DOS and the Town of Southold. It is envisioned that the pier structures will be built utilizing the following general sequence and methodology. } The marine contractor will arrive by water with barge-mounted crane and push boat or tug and work boats or dredge scow. FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB WEST HARBOR, FISHERS ISLAND NARRATIVE STATEMENT & SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION JANUARY 19, 2009 GENERAL Fishers Island Yacht Club leases parcel 1000-010-1-9, owned by the Fishers Island Development Company, off of Central Avenue located along the west shore of West Harbor on Fishers Island. The site is flat to gently sloped, sandy, gravel earthen materials, vegetated with grass, brush, ground cover and lxees. The frontage of the property is approximately 300 feet along West Harbor abutted by the Goose Island Corporation to the east and Mr. & Mrs. Gregory Sharp to the west. The waterfront consists of a rock revetment lined shore along the north, tidal wetlands fringe vegetation at the base of the gently sloped tree-lined terrace to the south of the pier. It is the Fishers Island Yacht Club's desire to make dock modifications to their piers and floating dock system south of the main pier and dredge to optimize the geometry and usefulness of the dock facilities. Attached are application drawings prepared for this project. This supplemental narrative has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Town of Southold, Ordinance No. 6, 2004, and the Waterfront Revitalization Program related to docks and shorefront improvements. In addition, various coastal policies under the New York State Coastal Manageraent Act are addressed herein for review by the New York State Department of State and Department of Environmental Conservation. DESCRIPTION OF WORK The project is to replace various wood floating docks with concrete floating docks and finger piers, make minor modifications to the fixed pier at the southeast end of the dock facilities and dredge 13,000 (+/-) CY of marine sandy silts mechanically over an area of 145,000 (+/-) SF with a one-foot overdredge allowance of 6,000 (+/-) CY for open water disposal at the New London open water disposal are (NLDS) ha Long Island Sound in accordance with existing guidelines set forth by the US Army Corps of Engineers (NY and New England Regions), the NYS DEC, NYS DOS and the Town of Southold. It is envisioned that the pier structures will be built utilizing the following general sequence and methodology. The marine contractor will arrive by water with barge-mounted crane and push boat or tug and work boats or dredge scow. LOCAL WATERFRON~REVITALIZATION POLICIES The Town of Southotd, LWRP policie~ that are applicable to the Fishers Island Yacht Club dock extension are a local refinement of the Long Island Sound Regional Coastal Management Program policies that apply throughout Long Island Sound under the Coastal Zone Management program administered by the NYS Department of State. The site is in West Harbor on Fishers Island and is characterized as Developed Coast on the east shore at the Hay Harbor Club site to the parcel north and south shore and currently undeveloped coast or natural coast on the west shore The developed coast policies are applicable as follows: Policy 1 is to foster a pattern of development that enhances conm~unity character mid preserves natural resources to the maximum extent and minimizes adverse impacts on the environment, Policy 2 is to preserve historic resources, Policy 3 is to enhance and protect scenic resources and visual quality. The proposed dock modifications are consistent with waterfront development on Fishers Island and in coastal areas. The proposed work is reconstruction, conversion (of B Dock) and expansion of existing piers and floats. The pier will be made of timbers and utilizes the materials allowable under Town of Southold Local Law #6 and consistent with other adjacent dock facilities and characteristics for the visual and scenic considerations in the harbor. The encroachment has been minimized to the maximum possible extent to be consistent with DEC policies and the structures are as low profile as possible consistent with the safe and efficient use of the waters and consistent with the boating seasons tidal range of this site. NATURAL COAST POLICIES The Natural Coastal Policies are 4 through 8 and require consideration as follows: Policy 4 - Mh~i~ize loss of life, structures and natural resources from flooding and erosion, Policy 5 - Protect and improve water quality Policy 6 - Protect and restore the quality and function of the eeo-system, Policy 7 - Protect and improve air quality, Policy 8 - Minimize environmental degradation primarily from solid waste and hazardous substances. The proposed floating dock and pier reconfiguration has been laid out so as to be consistent with the DEC permit requirements for such structures. As such, it provides adequate height to clear environmental resources of concern and the materials to be utilized are consistent with Town of Southold's Local Law #6 regarding environmental quality and the use of pressure-treated Southem Yellow Pine timber components in particular. There will be no adverse impacts on air quality as a result of these dock facilities. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9 sets forth a priority to provide for public access and recreational use of coastal waters, public lands and public resources of the Town. This project maintains recreational boating facilities and so is consistent with this policy. 3 WORKING COAST PO _~IES The policies of this section relate to the following: Policy 10 - Protection of the Town's water-dependent uses and promoting new water- dependent uses in suitable locations, Policy 11 - Promoting sustainable use of living marine resources, Policy 12 - Protect agricultural lands, Policy 13 - Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. While most of the Working Coast Policies are not applicable to this site or this type of project, Policy 10, promoting water-dependent uses and the citing of water-dependent uses in appropriate areas is applicable and the proposed project makes the most beneficial use of the land and dock facilities. This project has been laid out with specific reference to and review of the Waterfront Revitalization Program policies and is considered to be consistent. DREDGING In stunmary, the proposed dock modifications, repair and reconstruction is typical of recreational boating facilities throughout the area and all along coastal New England. The structures have been minimized in size, height, and structure so as to be consistent with other facilities ora similar nature and the minimum necessary components to accommodate safe and efficient boating operations from this site. This project does not interfere with public access or use of public trust waters and lands of the State, it does not interfere with navigation, it will not create soil or sedimentation and dredging will not create erosion problems, in fact, the wood retaining structure should help minimize bank erosion. The pier reconstruction does not adversely affect environmental resources in the area where the facility must span the shallow sub-tidal zone at the shore line, the facility retains its alignment in the area where environmental resources have already been diminished so as not to worsen any of these conditions. The height of the structure has been maintained so as to allow vegetation growth along the shoreline by tidal wetlands plants if other conditions are conducive to such growth. The float re-alignment has also been configured reaching out to deep water thus further minimizing adverse environmental impacts. There is no loss of valuable marine and wetland habitat and no water quality degradation as a result of this project. Reference is made to the NYS DEC study from 2000 indicating the suitability of pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine piles and super-structure components for this type of purpose. In accordance with Town of Southold Local Law #6, decking for the floats and the pier and the ramp treads will be of woods or materials other than CCA pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine. No natural protective features or processes will be adversely impacted as a result of the proposed dock work. This project is consistent with zoning policies and ordinances for the Town. There will be no development of the upland related to this dock facility that will create point sources of pollution or drainage. The floating docks are the nfinimal size for stability considerations especially acknowledging the loading and waves from West Harbor and the floating docks are broadside to those waves. The float is suitably sized and adequate stable for a ramp landing and the ramp has been made no longer than necessary in order to minimize the pier structure and maximize boating access (slips). 4 REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 97-25 OF THE WETLANDS~AW 6, 2004 The permittee acknowledge~ that the'validity of this permit is subject to the approval of other govenunental or municipal authorities. The permittee does, by the acceptance of this permit, assume all responsibility for operations undertaken pursuant to this permit, and shall take all precautions for the prevention of injuries to persons and property resulting fi.om such operations. By such acceptance, the permittee also agrees to indemnify and save harmless the Town of Southold and its officers. The permittee gives consent to the Town and its officers, employees and agents to enter upon the premises where such operations are being conducted to make such inspections to determine whether said operations are being conducted in conformity with the permit. The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing one week prior to initiation of any and all operations. The permittee will notify the Trustees in writing upon completion of operations such that the site can be inspected for issuance for a certificate of compliance. In response to Sub-section 2a and the General Rules for Standards of Residential and Commercial Docks, the following additional information is offered. Permits for the work are being applied for through the Town, US ACOE, NYS DEC and a coastal zone consistency determination by the NYS DOS. The new piles to be installed will be of sturdy, durable and stable materials; in all likelihood, Grecnhart or CCA Type iii pressure-treated Southern Yellow Pine (SYP) piles with new split caps and braces of the same SYP materials. These members will be a minimum of 3 x 8's and more oflen, 3 x 10's with at least one M" bolt per connection, and in many cases, two ~" bolts per connection. Tiffs pier is a fixed, pile-supported timber structure with a float and therefore will not adversely affect the free circulation of water or reduce the effects of fluctuating water levels in West Harbor. In addition, the pier does not present any adverse modification of the shoreliue. The pier's elevation is such that in extreme high flood tides the structure will be inundated. The structure's SYP timber materials are specifically grown for this purpose and are capable of withstanding full immersion; they represent the standard of the industry for marine construction. With the connections described above, this stmcture will be able to survive repeated inundations and even direct waves at high tide elevations with a structural life ofl0 to 20 years. The pier support will include driving new piles at regular intervals to the maximum extent possible in order to obtain the desired pier alignment and support intervals. The use of CCA pressure-treated piles and timbers can be approved for this project in accordance with Local Law 6. 5 The pier and uew floats will not be decked with ~r~A pressure-treated Southern Pine. This pier extension provides a safe pedestrian surface for access to the sail boats and mttor boats. Forty-two inch mils may be installed on the overland section of the pier for safer)'. The 15-foot clearance specified in this paragraph should not be an issue because the reconstruction and expansion is basically parallel to shore and does not project into the navigation way for other boaters in the harbor or adjacent docks. Upon receipt of the permit for this project, appropriate permit numbers and a Town permit placard will be affixed to the most seaward face of the pier for identification from the water. There are no permanent structures located above the pier decking, nor are any planned at this time other than the power posts and railing which are fixed by function and designed for this environment. It is currently possible to provide a passage way to the upland via the south romp to get around the pier and that access ability will be retained. There is approximately four feet of clearance to walk under the pier at low tide, however, foot traffic in this area is rare, if at all. NEW YORK STATE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM These application documents include a copy of the Federal Consistency Assessment Form utilized for the New York State Coastal Managemeut Program under the jurisdiction of the New York State Department of State. The following policies have been identified as pertinent to this application and the reason for consistency associated with this project is outlined in each respective case. Policy 2 -Water Dependent Uses - This project is to repair, restore and, to aN extent, re- configure a fully functional water dependent use, a recreational boating dock facility at this site in support of recreational boating and sailing instruction. Policy 5 - Use of Existing Developed Shorefi'out - There is developed shoreline on this site. This project utilizes existing shorefront which has been altered by the long-standing facilities. The project will be to re-build, repair, re-configure existing dock facilities to make them safe and reliably usable in most weather conditions. Policy 7 - Significant Fish & Wildlife Habitat - Protection of significant fish and wildlife habitat has been considered in the development of this project layout. The pier to the shoreward point of beginning is over the rocky, vegetated shoreline fringe and above the rocky intertidal sediments and should not jeopardize the integrity of existing vegetation, although such is scarce, primarily rockweed. Typically there is a slight environmental benefit to the project because of the structure in the water column which barnacles, algae and crustaceans will inhabit and the structures provide protection primarily for juvenile fish. 6 Privation Policy 8 - Protection & of Habitat - Protection and pr~ation of habitat has also been considered in this project and the dock structure is being kept'~to its minimal configuration and of materials consistent with standards of: the industry and restrictions set forth in the Wetlands Law, No. 6, 2004 set forth'by the To~n of Southold and standards of the NYS DEC. Policy 11 - Minimize Damage to Natural Resources - The dock construction project has been laid out in such a way so as to minimize dmnage to natural resources as identified in Policy 7 above. The pier reconstruction has been sited in the area where the existing pier and floating dock facilities have existed for decades. The dredging is proposed to maintain current and future boating activities while minimizing adverse impacts such as bottom sediment re- suspension due to propeller contact or thrust induced erosion. Dredging has been stepped progressively; higher coming into the basin where smaller boats will dominate the mix, with shallower drafts. Policy 14 -No Measurable Increase in Flooding - This project consists of construction of an open wood pile and timber pier which in no way adversely affects waterflow and circulation in Hay Harbor or flooding potential of the area. Flood levels all around Fishers Island are dictated by water levels in Long Island Sound, Fishers Island Sound and Block Island Sound and the structures will have no adverse i~ffluence on those levels. Policy 15 - No New Dredging - Maintenance dredging is proposed in this project. Suspended marine silts have accmnalated in tltis "dead end" of West Harbor for decades. The bottom depths are such that dredging is required to maintain viable access. This project has utilized a stepped configuration from the east to west to minimize the volume of material to be removed and deep water depths similar to the existing conditions. Repeated shallow water benthic studies in sandy mud to silty marina sediments have shown stressed populations of crustaceans and mollusks which inhabit these sediments and that they re-colonize and re-populate within a year or so of the dredging work. Increasing the water depth will tend to diminish the re- suspension impacts on the habitat and these colonies of creatures and so it is felt that the one- time disturbance, occurring in accordance with seasonal shellfish spawning restrictions will ultimately provide the proper balance between environmental concerns and the Coastal Zone Policies to foster recreational boating facilities and opportunities. The New England Regional Office of the USACOE has issued a suitability determination allowing for open-water disposal of dredge sediments from this project at NLDS (New London). Policy 19 - Impact on Public Access - Public access will not be jeopardized or impeded as a result of this project. As a matter of fact, there is almost no public access usage of the public trust lands or waters at this site. There is no Federal channel to Fishers Island Yacht Club. The intertidal zone in the dock facility area is significantly covered by boulders with tidal wetlands fiinge marsh vegetation to the south. The Fishers Island Yacht Club pier and floats occupy far less than the landward 25% of the waterway (West Harbor) width in accordance with US ACOE policies. Thus, public access to the State's lands and waters will not be adversely affected by the project. Policy 20 - Public Trust Compatibility with Existing Adjoining Properties and Land Uses- Public Trust compatibility with existing adjoining properties and land uses have also been considered in this project. Several nearby properties have small docking facilities and this docking facility will not interfere with existing or the likely configuration of future facilities on immediately adjoining properties or the logical allocation of littoral development rights in this part of West Harbor. These piers are long-standing structures. Policy 21 - Water Recreation - This project is recreational opportunities policies set forth in this section. with water-dependent Policy 24 -Scenic Resources, Impairment fir Loss - This policy is designed to prevent impairment or loss of scenic resources. The reconstruction of the fixed wood pile and timber pier are float reconstruction and recontiguration and will not represent a new encroachment or structure which would create a loss of scenic resources. The elevated in. board landing section of the pier will be largely over-shadowed by the phragmitae growth, the' spartina fiS. nge marsh on the site. The one property owner most likely to be impacted is the cottage of Gregory and Perm~ Shoa'tJ just west of the club mad they do not object to the proposed project Policy 25 - Enhance Overall Scenic Quality - The pier and floats will be consistent with the scenic quality of the area and will not diminish scenic resources as described in Policy 24 above. Policy 44 - Preserve and Protect Tidal Wetlands - tt is acknowledged that the fragmented fringe marsh of spartina altema flora along the shoref~ont is a valuable resource. The floating dock and fixed wood pile and timber pier work in this project has taken advantage of the existing an-vegetated strip of the shoreline caused by the existing pier in order to avoid adverse wetlands impact. The height of the pier should allow opportunities for the growth of tidal vegetation but that has not thus far occurred. No changes to the pier are proposed in this area nattmalty up to, and to an extent, beneath the wood pier. SUMMARY This project proposes the repair, expansion and reconstruction of a long-standing pier and reconfiguration of floats and dredging in an existing, long-standing facility for community-wide recreational boating access. A copy of all US Army Corps of Engineers, NYS DEC and Town of Southold applications are an_ached as substantiation for and in support of this project. A dredging suitability determination has been made by the US Army Corps of Engineers, NeW England Regional Office, for open-water disposal at the New London Open Water Disposal site ('NLDS). This project complies with applicable standards of the New York State Coastal Management Act, NYS / DEC Tidal Wetland Regulations and criteria for approval, the Town of Southold Waterfront Revitalization Program and Local Ordinance No. 6, 2004, and its approval is respectfully requested. Respectfully submitted, DOI2KO, INC. ~ Keith B. Neilson, P.E. 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Put,ese: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer, Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of' the env~onment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis, In addition, many who have knowledge in one parrJcular area may not be aware of the broader concer~ affecting the ques-tion of signir~3nce, The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Fall EAF Components: The full EAF is com~ of three parts: Part 1: Provides objecUve data and information about a given project and its site. By identi~ing basic project data, it assists a rev~W~e~ i~ the analysis that t_~ ~_~'~ in Pa~W,s 2 a~l 3. Part Z: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an h,q.~ct i5 #kely to be t.u~ mk~'~d smafl to mod~ ul~ or whether It is a potential~j-large ~tPact, The form also identirm-s whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Prat 3: tf any m~oact m Part 2 is identified as potentia#yqarge, then Pert 3 is used to eveluatewbether or flot thei.~ut.-I is actually important. THIS AREA FOR ~ USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a ne~ dec~afion will be prepared. Although the project could have a significant effect on the emmonment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED neo.~five declaration will be pnq~nM. * r--] c. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a pe~it~e dec~,a~ ~ be p~. *A Conclitioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB - DOCK MODIFICATIONS & DREDGING Name of Action Name of Lead Agency LUC1NDA HERRICK COMMODORE Print or Type Name of Responsible ofr~:er in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) website Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION P~epm'ed by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and pubt~; review. Provide any addibenal informatiOn you bcl~c;'c will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is e~ _~cA_ed that come--on of the full FAF will be ~ndent on mform~f!nn currently ave!L~h!~ a~d wi~ riot revolve new studies, research or investigation, if information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action DOCK MODIFICATIONS & DREDGING Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) CENTRAL AVENUE, FISHERS ISLAND, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY Name of Applicant/Sponsor FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB Address P. O. BOX E City / PO FISHERS ISLAND State NY Zip Code 06390 Business Telephone (631)788-7036 Name of Owner (if different) Address C~y/PO Business Telephone State Zip Code Description of Action: DREDGE 13,000 (+/-) CY OF SANDY SILT WITH A 1-FT. OVERDREDGE ALLOWANCE OF 6,000 (+/-) CY OVER 145,000 (+/-) SF BY CLAMSHELL BUCKET FOR OPEN WATER DISPOSAL AT NEW LONDON (NLDS). REMOVE EXISTING "A" DOCK WITH SAILING PROGRAM FLOAT, "B" DOCK (PIER) WITH FLOTING "T" END AND DINGHY DOCK, CONSTRUCT 36 (+/-) LF OF 7-FT. WIDE MAIN PIER EXTENSION AND SEVEN 30 (+/-) LF X 4-FT. WIDE FIXED FINGERS WITH ASSOCIATED SUPPORT AND TIE-OFF/FENDER PILES. INSTALL 228 (+/-) LF OF 8-FT. WIDE MAIN FLOAT WITH EIGHTEEN 20 LF X 3-FT. WIDE FINGER FLOATS, 216 (+/-) LF OF 8-FT.WIDE MAIN FLOAT WITH THIRTEEN 20 LF X 3-FT. WIDE FINGER FLOATS, TWO 20 LF X 4-FT FINGER FLOATS, TWO 13-FT. X 42-FT AND ONE 19-FT. X 42-FT. SAIL FLOATS ALL WITH ASSOCIATED RAMPS, RESTRAINT PILES AND TIE-OFF / FENDER PILES, RECONSTRUCT OR REPLACE AN EXISTING 12' X 20' FLOATING DINGHY DOCK WATERWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER LINE. INSTALL A SMALL BOAT CRANE LANDWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER LINE. Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question.-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Pffysh::at S~LG.g of m.~ 011 i~Y.~"t, ~Lh dm,elop~.d' and u,',dev~l.,~.; area~. 1. Present Land Use: [] Urban N Industrial [] Commercial N Forest N Agriculture D Other D Residential (suburban) D Rural (non-farm) 2. Total acreage of project ama: 4 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) Wate~ Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate b/pa) PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION 4 ecrus 4 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Silt~, sand}, bottom sediments a. Soil drainage: DWell drained % of site [] Moderately well drained % of site, r~Poorly drained 100 % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? Q acres (see I NYCRR 370). 4, Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ~] Yes [] No a. What is depth to bedrock ~ (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: r~0.10% 100% NlO_ 15% % [~] 15% or greater 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? % Is project substantiall~contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? r-] Yes ~] No DYes [~No 8. What is the depth of the water table? 0 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primal, principal, or sole source aquifer? r-lYes [] No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [] Yes r~No Page 3 of 21 1 1. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Accordin~ to: IDREDGING SITE IS A YACHT CLUB DOCK BASIN DYes [~No [dentif~ each species: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? r=lYes [~]No Describe: I 13. Is the project site presentJy used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? r~l Yes DNo if ~,es, explain: IT HE AREA TO BE DREDGE IS A BOAT DOCK FACILITY BASIN. 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ra-==JYes DNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or cond~luous to prO)ect area: THERE IS A WETLANDS FRINGE MARSH ALONG THE SHORE OF WEST HARBOR JUST SOUTH OF THE YACHT CLUB BASIN TO BE DREDGED. b. Size (in acres): 3 ACRES, ESTIMATED Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? [] Yes [] No a. If YES, does sufficient capecibj exist to allow connection? [] Yes b. If YES, will improvements be necesser3/to allow connection? No DYes []No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? DYes [~No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL. and 6 NYCRR 6177 [~]Yes E~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). r.~ Yes [] No a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: b. Project acreage to be developed: N/A acres initially; 2 +/- acres. acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: acres. d, Length of project, in miles: (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. % f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 30; proposed 0 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: N/A (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: height; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? Will disturbed areas be reclaimed []Yes •No ON/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? NAVIGABLE WATER FOR RECREATIONAL BOATING Multiple Family width; 200 +/- ft. 20~000 tons/cubic yards. Condominium length. b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? N Yes [] No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? N Yes [] No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees. shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? DYes ~=~No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: 3 months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 2 (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: 01 month 08 year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: 08 month 09 year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [] Yes [~ No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? [] Yes [] No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 3; after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [] Yes r~ No if yes, explain: 12, Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [] Yes [] No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount 20,000 +/- CY dredged siitJsaad b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged LONG [SI.AND SOUND 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [] Yes [] No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by pmposel? DYes [~'~No If yes, explain: I 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 1 O0 year flood plain? [] Yes [] No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [~ Yes [r~ No a, If yes, what is the amount par month? 0 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [] Yes [] No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? [] Yes [] No Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? r~Yes NNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? ~) tons/month. b, If yes, what is the anticipated site life? Q years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? DYes [~'~No 19, Will pro~ect routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? [] Yes [] No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? r~Yes DNo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? [] Yes [] No If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity Q gallons/minute, 23. Total anticipated water usage per day Q gallons/day. 24, Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? [] Yes [~ No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Rngui~l: Type Submittal Date Town of Southold 12/07 City, Town, Village Board [~Yes ~ No City, Town, Village Planning Board DYes [] No City, Town Zoning Board DYes [] No City, County Health Department [] Yes [] NO Other Local Agencies DYes [] No Other Regional Agencies DYes [] No State Agencies [] Yes [] No US ACOE r'"l Federal Agencies I I Yes I I No NYS DEC 12/07 12/07 C. Zoning aid Planning I~om~ltio~ 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? [~]Yes [] No If Yes, indicate decision required: [] Zoning amendment [] Zoning variance [] New/revision of master plan [] Site plan [] Special use permit [] Resource management plan D Subdivision ]Other Page 8 of 21 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? I RESIDENTIAL, WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT 3. Whet is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? I RESIDENTIAL, WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? NO CHANGE 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? I RESIDENTIAL / COMMERCIAL 6, Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? I 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classif~.ations within a ~ mile radius of proposed action? r~Yes [] No THE FISHERS ISLAND UTILITIES COMPANY OPERATES 1/4 MILE NORTH OF THE YACHT CLUB AND THE PROPERTY IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF THE SITE IS THE "MOBIL" DOCK WHICH OPERATES AS FREIGHT AHD CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL BULK DELIVERY POINT AND ALSO SERVES A SMALL COMMUTER FERRY. ALL OTHER PROPERTIES WEST ARE RESIDENTIAL. THE UTILITY COMPANY OWNS A PIECE OF VACANT LAND UP TO 1/4 MILE SOUTHWEST OF THE SITE. 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a ~ mile? 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed?. a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? [~Yes [] No Page 9 of 21 ' 10 Will proposed action require any a~ization(s) for tl~ formation of sewer or water (~l~t$? LJ Yes [~ No 1 1. Wilt the proposed action create a demand for an)' community provided ~e~nces (recreations, education, police, fire protection? r--J Yes r~JNo a. Il' yes. is existing capacity sufficient to handle prOJected demand? [] Yes [] No 12. Wi# the proposed action result in the generation or traffic significantly above present levels? [--1 Ye~ [] No a. If yes, is the existing road netwo~ adequate to handle the additional traffic, []Yes [] No D. Informal~nal Details Attach any additional informatk~n ~ ~y ~ n~ to clarify y~r ~t If t~e ~e ~ ~y ~ any a~ i~ts as~ia[~ with y~' ~o~1, plea~ di~us~ ~uch ir~[~ al~ t~ measures which you pf~ to ~tigate ~ av~ t~m, I cc~fy that t~ inf~mat~ ~ovid~ a~ve ts ff~ to thc ~st of my knee. ~i~S~n~ Na~ FISIIERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB Date LtJC~DA HERRICK, CO~OI~RE Page 10 of 21 T~wn of Southold LWRP~NSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FOR~~ INSTRUCTIONS All applicants for permits* including To,am of Southotd agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in maldng a deteJ,~,;,~tion of consistency. *Except for minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other rninisterial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Before answering the questiom in Section C, the preparer of thi~ form should review' the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southotd Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus. each answer must be ~xpl~ined ill detail, listin~ both SUODortin~ and non-suooortin~ facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork. net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's Office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 1000 -010-1-9 PROJECT NAME: FISHERS ISLAND YACHT CLUB, Maintenance Dredging The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board __ Planning Board __ Building Dept. __ Board of Trustees X 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): a) Action undertaken directly to Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant loan subsidy) c) Permit, approval, license, certification: X Nature and extent of action: DREDGE 13,000 (+/-) CY OF SANDY SILT WITH A 1-FT. OVERDREDGE ALLOWANCE OF 6,000 (+/-) CY OVER 145,000 (+/-) SF BY CLAMSHELL BUCKET FOR OPEN WATER DISPOSAL AT NEW LONDON ('NLDS). REMOVE EXISTING "A' DOCK WITH SAILING PROGRAM FLOAT, "B' DOCK (PIER) WITH FLOTING "T" END AND DINGHY DOCK, CONSTRUCT 36 (+/-) LF OF 7- FT. WIDE MAIN PIER EXTENSION AND SEVEN 30 (+/-) LF X 4-FT. WIDE FIXED FINGERS WITH ASSOCIATED SUPPORT AND TIE-OFF/FENDER PILES. INSTALL 228 (+/-) LF OF g-FT. WIDE MAIN FLOAT WITH EIGHTEEN 20 LF X 3-FT. WIDE FINGER FLOATS, 216 (+/-) LF OF 8-FT.WIDE MAIN FLOAT WITH THIRTEEN 20 LF X 3-FT. WIDE FINGER FLOATS, TWO 20 1.2 X 4-FT FINGER FLOATS, TWO 13-FT. X 42-FT AND ONE 19-FT. X 42-FT. SAIL FLOATS ALL WITH ASSOCIATED RAMPS, RESTRAINT PILES AND TIE-OFF / FENDER PILES, RECONSTRUCT OR REPLACE AN EXISTING 12' X 20' FLOATING DINGHY DOCK WATERWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER LINE. INSTALL A SMALL BOAT CRANE LANDWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER LINE. Location of action: Central Avenue, southwest comer of West Harbor Site acreage: Present Land use: Commercial Present Zoning Classification: Commercial If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: a) Name of applicant: Fishers Island Yacht Club b) Mailing Address: c/o Mr. Burton G, Tremaine, III, Marine Committee Chairman P.O. Box E, Fishers Island, New York 06390 c) Telephone number: Area Code (631) 788-7036 d) Application number, if any_ Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ~X No __ If yes, wh/ch state or federal Agency? US ACOE, NYS DEC Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support of not support the policies. Provide aH proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form he returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of devebpmem. See LWRP Section gH - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. X Yes __ No __ Not Applicable Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section l~ - Policies Page 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria. __ Yes __ No X Not Applicable 2 Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section IH - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria __ Yes __ No X Not Applicable NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section IH - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria. __ Yes __ No X Not Apptica~o:¢ Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southoid. See LWRP Section IH - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria. Yes __ No X Not Applicable This project will not have any affect on suitability of or availability of drinking water on Fishers Island, Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section IH - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. X Yes __ No __ Not Applicable Policy 7. Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. Yes Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. __ No X Not Applicable There are no air quality issues related to this proiect. See LWRPSectionllI - Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section IH - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. __ Yes No X Not Applicable There is no solid waste or hazardous substances to be generated from this project. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for publie aceess to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, publie lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. Sec LWRP Section m - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. __ Yes __ No X Not Applicable This project is being conducted on private land. The public mast lands and waters constitutes the area between the mean high water line and mean low water line and the resources are from the high tide line, out. These environmental resources are being protected by the design standards dictated by the NYS DEC. WORKING COAST POLICIES Po?:cy 10. Pr~tc~ $out~ol~'s water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section IH - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. X Yes __ No __ Not Applieable 4 Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. Yes __ No X Not Applicable Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. __ Yes No X Not Applicable Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral sources. See LWRP Section IH - Policies; pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Yes __ No X Not Applicable PREPARED BY: Keith B. Neilson, P.E. TITLE Agent DATE February 12, 2009 [~ocko i~ ~l'lc, Serving the waterfront community since 1987 RO. Box 421, Mystic, CT 06355 (860) 572-8939 Fax: (860) 572-7569, email: docko~snet, net Mr. Jim King, President Southold Board of Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 FEB 2O09 February 13, 2009 Fishers Island Yacht Club, West Harbor Dock Modifications &Dredging Dear Mr. King: On behalf of the Fishers Island Yacht Club, we enclose herewith the following in support offl~is permit application for maintenance dredging in West Harbor on Fishers Island. Two prints each of plans titled: Project: Waterway: Location: Applicant: Date: "Dock Modifications & Dredging" West Harbor Town of Southotd Suffolk County, New York Fishers Island Yacht Club January 2, 2008 Two copies of the Southold Board of Trustees permit appli~aion, SEQR-Part 1, LWRP Consistency Assessment Form, Tax Assessor's Map, site photographs and location map. Check in the mount of $250.00 payable to the Town of Southold. One copy of each of the other applications to regulatory agencies. I trust that you will find this application package complete and acceptable; please let me know if the need for further information arises. Very truly yours, DOCKO, IN~. ei B. Neilson, P.E. KBN.'jm Enclosures CC: FIYC: Herrick, Tremaine US ACOE NYS DEC: Environmemal Permits NYS DOS File: 00-03-1078 F.I.Y.C. N PAVED PARKING AREA STOCKADE N/F ~ PENELOPE C. 9HARP lO APPROXI MATE EDGE OF +6..4- +6.5 /' EC~TION ./' SPARTINA ALTERNiFLOP-.A LIMIT __. f ~- ~'--- ~,, -' LIPIlT. P~ED~E TO -4 5,000-+CY OVER // FOOTPRINT OF PROPOSE -- FLOATING SEAWALL' ~ FACE / N/F GOOSE ISLAND CORPOI2-ATON (see sheetS ,/ +03- '/I / / /APPROXIMATe-tO~ PRO, PER'FY L~NE O~ED~E TO// ~ -~ I"1L W I O00+_CY OVER LINE 10,000±5F MOORING. (~P) FIXE~FIN~R ~ / / / / .IO0+_CY OVEI~ 1,000:¢F FOOTPRINTS OF PROPOSED DOCK ,2nd SHOREFRONT MODIFICATIONS PERMITS PENDING: NY DEC 1-47~&01110/00008 ACOE NAN-2OO&_~20-EIEU and T.O.S. ~INTE~NCE O~EO~E 1~,000~ OF SANO/SIb T OVE~ AN A~ OF 1~2000~¢F WITH A I-~ OVEr'EDgE ALLOWANCE OF ;~O*CY TO -7 ~L~ 8, O00+-¢F -6- -5 / / / / / / FOOTPRINT OF PROPOSE~ FLOATING DOCK SYSTEM (sse sheets 6 $ 7) I"IAINTENANCE IDI~E¢GE I~,O00+-CY OF _~AND/¢IL'I' OVER AN AREA OF WITH A I-FT ~LOWANCE OF ~ ~Y C~M~HELL ~UCKET ~HO~E ID~EIDGE TO -_5 Mb W PILE FOOTPRINT OF PROPOSED PIER EXTENSION WITH 1A--T "A" OOCK :FIXED FINGER (TYP) (see sheete ¢ $ '7) / 'TO -7 OVE~< PILING / NO'T~: 1. ELEVATION DATUM iS MEAN LOW 'vVATEP. I ,.OCATIOIN 2. TIDE DATA I~ TAKEN Pi2.0hl THE 2007 NOAA TIDE TABLES. ~FEP-.ENCE StLVE~ EEL COVE ON FI~HE~ ISLAND. ~. ~OJ~CT D~ED~B 1¢,00~ WITH A 1-~ O~D~E ~LOWANC~ OF 6,00~CY, OF ~ANDY ~ILT 0~ I~2,OOO=~F BY C~M~HELL BUCKE FO~ OPEN WATE~ Ol~PO~, CON~TRU~ ~6~LF OF 7-~ WiDE ~IN PIE~ ~N¢ION ~D S~N ~O~L~ X ~ WIDE ~IXED FINPE~ WiTH ~¢OC~D ~UPPORT AND TIFOF/FENDE~ PILES. ~NPT~ 2~LF OF 8-~ WIDE ~N bOAT WITH EIGH~EN 20LF X 3-~ WIDE FLOAT~, 216tF OF 8-~ WIDE ~IN FLOAT WITH THIR~BN 20LF X ~-~ WIDE RNGER FLOATS, ~0 20LF X ~ RN~R FLOATS, %VO 1~-~ X 42-~ ~O ONE 19-~ X 42-~ PAIL FLOATS, ALL ~VITH ~, ~E~INT R~S AND TIE-OFF/~ND~ PIL~, ~ECON~UCT O~ ~EP~CE ~ ~TIN~ 12-~ X 20-~ DIN~ F~AT, ~A~D OF THE ~PA~ENT HIgH WATE~ LIN~. IN¢T~L A 9~L BOAT ~NDW~ OF THE APPARENT HigH WA~ LINE· THE P~PO¢~ DOCK MODIRCATIONS ~LL SLIP CAP~I~ F~M 85~ TO 110~ & P~OJECT PURPO~: ~IN~NCE O~E~IN~ AND ~OC~ MODIFICATIONS FOR ~CE¢~ TO A YACHT CLU~ ~ ~UPPO~T OF ~EC~TIONAL BOATING, I~NO ~EIN~ P~O~ AND BE~THIN~ FO~ THE FI~HE~ I~ M~DIC~ EME~GEN~ T~NpPO~ATION COMPleTION OF SURVEY~ FOR P~MIT 5, THB~E APPLICATION D~WfN~¢ RE~E~ENT A ~ ~E NOT CONST~UC~ON CON.CT DOCUMENTS, APPROXIMATE SLOPE OF REPOSE EXISTING STONE REVtETMIENT F--.XISTIN® PlE~ "DOT'TOM ~EDIME[NT~: '., , ~ANDY GI2-AVI~L WITH STONE / EXISTING WEpT HA~50~ EXIERN¢ PIE~ E-DOCK "B" DOCK WITH 1-FI' P/E~ CUT DIVE. GE LIP"lIT -' WITH 1-F"F / / AH'vVL ~.~ -- -- ALWL O,O -4' WITH 1-F'F -- AHWL 3.6'-+ -- ALWL O.O -~' WITH 1-FT VA~IE¢ ~ 'CT/ON APPROVED i OARD OF DOCK MODIFICATIONS ~md DF~F--,.D~IN~ WEST HARBOR ADP-iL 22, FtSHE. I~S I~L~,ND YACHT CLUB FI~HEEP~ I~L..,~,ND - TOWN 0¢ 5OUTHOLD A~V~D BY: ~ Kell'h Nelleon, [Docko In¢, S/1¢/'200¢ 10:0~ AM Fehrs-lslnd-YC_OockModSE)redge_Town-¢oPhold_~E4E_~HEET-l.dw~ b£NCN ?47 ~ ~,~' ~,~?'~ t /¢ .e/ t4.4 / P~R~E' L"t MtN A R¥ ~?~:~"' .SHOWING PROPOSED DREDGING AT FISHERS WEST 15LAND IN HARBOR TOWN OF S U FFOL K NEW SCALE .SOUTHOLD COU N'TY YORK I"= 200' DA fL PA TE ~Y .: I L,/~N p