HomeMy WebLinkAboutByers, Alison (2)~oard of Trustees A1~lic&tion
AUTHOP~I ZATION
(where the ap~lic.ant is not the owner)
I, Byers
(print owner of property)
resicling at 10335 Nassau Point
(mailing a~.dress )
Road. Cutchoque, NY 11935
Silverman Architects P.C.
do hereby authorize Nemschick
( Agent )
to apply for permitls) from the
Southo!~ Board of Town Trustees on my behalf.
ncr s sight, re)
Pre-Submission site visit is also requested.
{eceived From
Address
AMT OF CASN
ACCOUNT
AMT PAID CXECK
BALANCE DUE
APl{ 1 1 2008
045335
Dollars $
PROJECT ID NUMBER
PART 1 - PROJECT INFORMATION
1. APPLICANT / SPONSOR
Nemschick Silverman Architects P.C.
3,PROJI=CT LOCATION:
Municipality Cutchogue
617.20
APPENDIX C
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW
SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only
( To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor)
2. PROJECT NAME
Byers Swimming Pool
· County Suffolk
4. PRECISE LOCATION: S~eet Addess and Road InterssctJons. Prominent landmarks etc -or provide mad
SEQR
10335 Nassau Point Road Cutchogue, NY, 11935. The very end of Nassau Point
PRO.OSEO AOT,O.: [] N.w E3
6 DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY:
The project entails the addition of a patio and swimming pool adjacent to the both the main
and the guest house. The pool will be off both the recreational and lap style.
7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED:
Initially 0.16 acres Uiflmataly 0.16 acres
8 W1LL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS?
~'lYes [] No If no, descdbe briefly:
9 WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? (Chooseasmanyasapply.)
~-~Residentia, e~lndustria, [~]Commercial r"--]Agriculture [~ParklFomstlOpenSpac. E~other (describe)
10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING. NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL
AGENCY (Federal, State ~- LOCal)
r~Yes [] No If yes, list ager~cy name ar}d permit / approval:
11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? E~Yes [~No it' yes, list agency ilame and permit I approval:
12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/ APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION?
E~]Yes ~]No
I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
Applicant / Sponsor Name Date:
Signature
If the action Is a Costal Area, and you are a state agency,
complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment
PART II - IMPACT ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Lead Agency)
A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 61 ?.47 if yes, coordinate l~e review process and u~e the FULL EAF.
~]Yes []No
WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN S N¥CRR, PART 617.6? It No, a negative
declaratle~ may be supemeded by another involved agency.
C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, if legil3ta)
C1. Exlating air quall~, sun'ace or groundwater quality or quan§ly, noise levels, exieting ~ pattern, solid waste production or disposal,
potential for areal(re, drainage or Pa3odiog ploblems? Explain briefly:
C2. Aesthe~c, agdcoltund, archaeological, Mstodc, or other natural or cultural resources; or comnaJnity or neighborhood character? Explain briefly:
C3. Vegetation ~ fauna, fi;h, shellfish or wildli~;e species, si~nif~ant habika'ts, or threatannd or endaog~ed ep~e~les--'~*~)~ b~iefly:' ' '
C5. Growth, subeequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the propos~(~ ~c~on? E.~ploln~-fly: '"
C6. Longten~,shch-t erm. cumula[ive, orolherolfectsnotidentifledlnCt-C5? Explainbdefly:
C7. O~er ~m?acts l,nclud~?~chan~les in use of eltber quanti
l.o
D. VVILL T~-P-ROjECT HA;E' AN IMPACT O r'N ~HE ENVIRONMENTAL cHAR~,CTER, 'S'T;;; THAT "CAUSED TH'E ES;AB '1~ -SHMENT OF"A CRITIC;[
ENVIRONMENTAL AREA (CEA~? fit 7es, explein bdere/c
E. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE1 CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? if),es explain:
PART Itt - I~: i I;HMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency)
INSTRUCTIONS: Fo~' each adverse effect identifind above, determine whether Jt is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each
effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duratloe; (d) iffeversibillty; (e)
geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments o~ reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain
sufficient detail to show that al~ relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. If question d of part ii was checked
yes, the deterrninalion of significance must evaluate the potential impact of the proposed action on the environmental charactai'isitcs of the C E/~..
Check this box if you have identified one or mom potentiarly large or signif'mant adverae impacts whicfl MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FUL[
EAF and/o~ prepare e positive declaration.
Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any suppohing documentedon, that the proposed aclJor
WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide, on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting thL,
determination.
Nemschick Silverman Architects P.C.
Name of Lead Agency Date
Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency
Title of Respo~qslble Officer
Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer)
Town of Southoid
LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM
A. INSTRUCTIONS
All applicants for penni/z* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for
proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This
assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in
making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits
and other ministerial perrnits not located within the Coastal Erosion Ha~ard.4rea.
Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt
minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local
Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its sitmificant
beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town).
If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will
affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency
review law. Thus~ each answer must be explained in detail, listing both suooortin~ and non-
~. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and
conditions, it shall not be undertaken.
A copy of the LWRP is available in the lbllowing places: online at the Town of Southold ' s
website (southoldtown.northfork.nct), thc Board of Trnstees Office, the Planning Department, all
local libraries and the Town Clerk's office.
B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION
SCTM# 119 _01 -14.1
PROJECT NAME Byers Swimming Pool
The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response):
TownBoard [] Planning Board ~] Building Dept. [] BoardofTrustees
Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response):
(a) Action tmdertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital
construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction)
(b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy)
(c) Permit, approval, license, certification:
Nature and extent of action:
N~w Pool and Patio
Location of action: 10335 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue, NY, 11935
Site acre. ageL 4.14
Present land use: Residential
Present zoning classification:
If an application for the proposed action has been filed with thc Town of Southold agency, thc following
information shall be provided:
(a) Name of applicant: Byers
(b) Mailing address: 10335 Nassau Point Road, Cutchugue, NY 11935
(c) Telephone number: Area Code ().
(d) Application number, if any:
Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency'?
Yes ~ No ~ If yes, which state or federal agency?
C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the projeet will further support or
not support the policies. Provide ail proposed Best Management Practices that wffi further each policy.
Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion.
DEVELOPED COAST POLICY
Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southoid that enhances community character,
preserves open space, makes efficient usc of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and
minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation
criteria.
Yes ~] No [] Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See
LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria
[] Yes [] No [~ Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See
LWRP Section IH - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evalualion criteria
~-] Yes ~ No ~-~ Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
NATURAL COAST POLICIES
Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP
Section IH - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evalualion criteria
~ Yes ~-~ No ~ Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section HI
- Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria
~-] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and funclion of the Town of Southold ecosystems including
Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. Sec LWRP Seclion IH - Policies; Pages 22
through 32 for evaluation criteria.
Yes No No~plicable
A~ach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies
Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria.
[] Yes [~ NO ~-~ Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 8. Minimize environmental dcgradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous
substances and wastes. See LWRP Section IH - PoLicies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria.
[] Yes ~-~ No ~-~ Not Applicable
PUBLIC COAST POLICIES
Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public
resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section Ill - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation
criteria.
~ Ye~ No ~] Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
WORKING COAST POLICES
Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in
suitable locations. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria.
[] Yes ~'] No ~-] Not Applicable
Atlach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peeonic
Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria.
['-] Yes [] No ~-] Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages
62 through 65 for evaluation criteria.
[] Yes [-~ No [~ Not Applicable
Attach additional sheets if necessary
Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP
Section IH - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria.
[] Yes [~ No [] Not Applicable
PREPARED BY TITLE DATE
LITTLE
PECONIC
BAY
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
SEAL REVISIONS/SUBMISSIONSDRAWING TITLE
POOL P AN
"... I~ bu~ne~ of ~GHIECTURE."_ ~ ~ ~ I CUTC~OGUE.10335 B~ZAU~xPOI~i 1955ROAD SCALE }RAWING NO
~ ~ BO~
735 Deeffoot Path, Cutchogue, New York 11935 - ~ DISTRICT SECTION BLOCK LOT D~AWN BY
Phone: 631-7~-7007 Fax: 631-7~-7~7 ,
h~p://~, ns-arch.corn . co~w,~,~ ~,o~ ~sc.c, ~v~A~ ~,.wcss ,c 1000 119 O1 14.1 & 14.2
,, ,'",,.._ -.., .... -. -. ....... -_--.- ........... · ~ ~0 ~,,
~ ~ ~ t/11,
~' .__-%~ ......... _ ...... _
N~5,~'~"~ '-.,_., ,..,
filT PLAN
Nemschick Silverman Architects P.C.
~ 10565 ~A~AU POINT ROAP SCALE DRAWING NO
- ~~ : ~ ~ CUTC~OGUL ~Y 1~955
73~ Deeffoot Path, Outchogue, New York 1J935 - ~ ~ ~ ~ A~ ~OTEP
Phone: ~3J-734-7007 Fax: 63J-73~-7347 DISTRICT. SECTION BLOCK: LOT: DRAWN BY
http://w~, ns-arch .eom
~ cow~ ~ ,~sc,~c~ s~w~*, ~cH~c~ ~c 1000 119 O~ 14.1 & ~4.2